natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A. ker rastoča drevesa skladiščijo ogljik iz ozračja in so pomemben vir in ponor tokov ogljika ter ker se gozdna območja v Evropi širijo, količina ogljika v evropski lesni biomasi pa naj bi se trenutno povečevala za 116 milijonov ton na leto,
A. whereas growing trees sequester carbon from the atmosphere and are a significant source and sink of carbon flows, and since European forests are expanding in area, the carbon in woody biomass in Europe is estimated to be expanding currently at a rate of 116 million MT per year,
B. ker je v skladu z izsledki gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo (UNECE) dolgoročni trend naraščanja gozdnatosti v Evropski uniji stabilen,
B. whereas, according to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the long-term trend of increasing forest coverage in the European Union is stable,
C. ker ima Evropa skupno 177 milijonov hektarjev gozdov in drugih gozdnih zemljišč, ki pokrivajo 42 % njenega ozemlja,
C. whereas Europe has a total area of forests and other wooded land of 177 million hectares, covering 42% of its land area,
D. ker so naravni pogoji različnih gozdnih območij v Evropi izredno raznoliki, od subarktičnih do sredozemskih in od alpskih do nižinskih, vključno s poplavnimi ravnicami in deltami rek,
D. whereas the diversity of natural conditions in the various forest regions in Europe is huge, ranging from sub-arctic to Mediterranean and from alpine to lowland, including flood plains and deltas,
E. ker gozdovi zagotavljajo preživetje milijonom delavcev, podjetnikov in lastnikov gozdov ter pomembno prispevajo k gospodarski rasti, zaposlovanju in splošni blaginji,
E. whereas forests provide a livelihood for millions of workers, entrepreneurs and forest owners, and contribute significantly to economic growth, jobs and prosperity,
F. ker je imel ta sektor leta 2005 približno 380 milijard EUR prometa, kar je enako devetim odstotkom evropskega bruto domačega proizvoda,
F. whereas in 2005 the sector had a turnover of approximately EUR 380 billion, equivalent to some 9% of GDP in Europe,
G. ker je trajnostno gospodarjenje z gozdovi, vključno z varstvom gozdov, bistveno za ohranjanje raznovrstnosti, zdravja in odpornosti gozdov,
G. whereas sustainable forest management, including forest protection, is crucial for keeping forests diverse, healthy and resilient,
H. ker so dejavno in trajnostno upravljani gozdovi eden najučinkovitejših načinov za skladiščenje CO 2 iz ozračja,
H. whereas actively and sustainably managed forests constitute one of the most effective means of storing CO 2 from the atmosphere,
2. meni, da je aktivna politika boja proti podnebnim spremembam v celoti združljiva s prizadevanji za nadaljnji razvoj lesne industrije kot pomembne industrijske panoge v Evropi; meni, da je lesno industrijo treba nadalje razvijati, da bo v prihodnosti še naprej prispevala k vzpostavitvi trajnostne gospodarske rasti, ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest in boju proti podnebnim spremembam;
Considers that a vigorous policy to combat climate change is entirely compatible with the ambition for further development of the forest industry as an important branch of industry in Europe; considers that the forest industry should be further developed so that it continues in the future to contribute towards sustainable economic growth, the creation of new jobs and the fight against climate change;
4. poudarja, da bi morale biti pobude za evropsko gozdarstvo usmerjene tako v „prilagajanje“ gozdov podnebnim spremembam kot v spremljanje in izboljševanje njihovega varstva, zlasti ko gre za habitate visoke kakovosti;
Points out that European forestry initiatives should be aimed both at ‘adapting’ forests to climate change and at monitoring and improving their protection, especially where, for example, high-quality habitats are concerned;
7. poudarja potrebo po večji konkurenčnosti v gozdarskem sektorju, ki bo dosežena z naložbami v inovacije, raziskave in razvoj mehanizmov za širjenje pridobljenega znanja;
Stresses the need for increased competitiveness in the forestry sector, to be achieved through investment in innovation, research and the development of mechanisms for disseminating knowledge generated;
16. opozarja, da je gozdarstvo naravni del celostne podeželske in regionalne politike, kar je dejstvo, ki ga je treba upoštevati v razpravah o prihodnosti skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013, kakor tudi, da je treba določiti ukrepe, povezane z gozdarstvom;
Points out that forestry is a natural part of integrated rural and regional policy, a fact which should be taken into account in the discussions on the future of the CAP after 2013, and that it is also necessary to determine the need for measures relating to forestry;
28. poudarja, da lahko prilagodljivost gozdov z vidika globalnih podnebnih sprememb pozitivno učinkuje na gozdne komplekse in gozdarsko panogo; poziva k večji finančni podpori za raziskave na področju zmožnosti prilagajanja;
Stresses that the adaptive capacities of forests can have a positive impact on forest complexes and the forest industry in relation to the global effect of climate change; calls, therefore, for more financial support for research on adaptive capacities;
31. meni, da bi moralo biti industrijsko izkoriščanje gozdnih virov za oskrbo z lesom kot surovine za kemično industrijo ali polizdelka za izdelavo gradbenih materialov v prvi vrsti omejeno na gozdne nasade; opozarja na škodljive učinke privatizacije naravnega bogastva držav članic, vključno z gozdovi;
Considers that the industrial exploitation of forest resources to supply wood as a raw material to the chemical industry, or a semi-manufacture for the production of construction materials, should be restricted primarily to forest plantations; warns against the adverse effects of privatising the Member States’ natural wealth, including forests;
34. priznava, da so v mediteranskih državah gozdovi še posebej pomembni zaradi svoje zmožnosti zniževanja temperatur in uravnavanja kroženja vode, zato meni, da bi morale biti pred ponovnim pogozdovanjem izvedene znanstvene študije za določitev vrst in območij, ki so najprimernejša za ohranjanje tal in zajetje deževnice;
Recognises that forests are particularly important in Mediterranean countries because of their ability to bring down the temperature and balance the water cycle, and therefore considers that reafforestation should be preceded by scientific studies to identify the varieties and sites best suited to the purposes of soil conservation and rainwater catchment;
36. meni, da je treba pri boju proti podnebnim spremembam gozdno-kmetijska drevesa zaradi njihovega pomena pri skladiščenju CO 2 obravnavati na enak način kot vse tradicionalne neproduktivne gozdove.
Considers that, given their importance in CO2 sequestration, agroforestry trees should be considered in the same way as non-productive traditional woodlands in relation to the fight against climate change.
António Fernando Correia De Campos, Andrzej Grzyb, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Ivari Padar, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Peter Skinner, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Catherine Trautmann
António Fernando Correia De Campos, Andrzej Grzyb, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Ivari Padar, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Peter Skinner, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Catherine Trautmann
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Bairbre de Brún, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Julie Girling, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Gilles Pargneaux, Antonyia Parvanova, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Bogusław Sonik, Salvatore Tatarella, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Bairbre de Brún, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Julie Girling, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Gilles Pargneaux, Antonyia Parvanova, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Theodoros Skylakakis, Bogusław Sonik, Salvatore Tatarella, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
Marisa Matias, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bill Newton Dunn, Bart Staes, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Marita Ulvskog, Anna Záborská
Marisa Matias, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bill Newton Dunn, Bart Staes, Eleni Theocharous, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Marita Ulvskog, Anna Záborská
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ....................................................................9
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ....................................9
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2011)0010 – C7‑0023/2011 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2011)0010 – C7‑0023/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0114/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0114/2011 ),
4. je pripravljen preučiti celotno stanje plačil glede na realizacijo proračuna za leto 2010;
Is ready to consider the overall situation of payments in the context of the outturn of the 2010 Budget;
1. ter zlasti točke 26 tega sporazuma,
1. , and in particular point 26 thereof,
(1) Evropska unija je ustanovila Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije („sklad“), da bi pokazala svojo solidarnost s prebivalstvom območij, ki so jih prizadele nesreče.
(1) The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the "Fund") to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(2) Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 dopušča uporabo sklada do letne zgornje meje v višini 1 milijarde EUR.
(2) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
(3) Uredba (ES) št. 2012/2002 vsebuje določbe, v skladu s katerimi se lahko sredstva sklada uporabijo.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.
(4) Poljska, Slovaška, Madžarska, Češka republika, Hrvaška in Romunija so predložile vloge za uporabo tega sklada v zvezi s katastrofo, ki so jo povzročili plazovi in hude poplave.
(4) Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Croatia and Romania submitted their application to mobilise the Fund, concerning disaster caused by landslides and heavy flooding.
V splošnem proračunu Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 se uporabijo sredstva Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v znesku 182.388.893 EUR za prevzem obveznosti in plačila.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 182 388 893 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Komisija predlaga uporabo sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije za Poljsko, Slovaško, Madžarsko, Češko republiko, Hrvaško in Romunijo na podlagi točke 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund in favour of Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Croatia and Romania on the basis of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA).
Ta sporazum omogoča uporabo sredstev solidarnostnega sklada z letno zgornjo mejo 1 milijarde EUR.
The IIA allows the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
Komisija je skupaj s predlogom za uporabo sklada za Poljsko, Slovaško, Madžarsko, Češko republiko, Hrvaško in Romunijo predložila tudi predlog spremembe proračuna (št. 1/2011 z dne 14. januarja 2011), da bi v proračun za leto 2011 vnesla sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila, kot zahteva točka 26 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
In parallel to the proposal to mobilise the Solidarity Fund in favour of Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Croatia and Romania, the Commission has presented a draft amending budget (DAB No 1/2011 of 14 January 2011) in order to enter in the 2011 budget the corresponding commitment and payment appropriations as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
Poljska je zaprosila za pomoč iz solidarnostnega sklada po poplavah maja in junija 2010, ki so prizadele velik del poljskega ozemlja v smeri jug–sever ob porečjih glavnih rek Visle, Odre in Varte.
Poland applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund after in May and June 2010 two consecutive flood waves affected a large part of the Polish territory coming from the south to the north moving downstream the main rivers Vistula, Oder and Warta.
Poplave so prizadele skoraj vse poljske pokrajine (vojvodstva) in povzročile ogromno škodo v kmetijskem sektorju, na javni infrastrukturi in zasebnem premoženju, prometnem omrežju in kulturni dediščini.
The floods hit almost all provinces ('voivodeships') of Poland causing significant damages to the farming sector, to public infrastructure and private assets, to transport networks and to cultural heritage sites.
Poljski organi so skupno neposredno škodo ocenili na 2.998.989.248 EUR.
The Polish authorities estimated the total direct damage at EUR 2 998 989 248.
Ta znesek pomeni približno 0,8468 % poljskega bruto nacionalnega dohodka.
This amount represents 0,8468 % of Poland's Gross National Income (GNI).
Slovaška je za pomoč iz solidarnostnega sklada zaprosila, potem ko je osrednje in vzhodne predele države maja in junija 2010 prizadelo najhujše deževje doslej.
Slovakia applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund after in May and June 2010 the central and eastern parts of Slovakia were hit by record heavy rainfall.
Zaradi dežja so se sprožili plazovi, poplave so zajele širša območja in povzročile veliko škodo na zasebnih infrastrukturnih objektih ter cestnih in železniških povezavah, škodo pa so utrpela tudi podjetja in kmetijstvo.
Areas were drenched, slopes slid and the wide-spread flooding caused severe damage to public and private infrastructure, to road and train networks, agriculture and businesses.
Slovaški organi so skupno neposredno škodo ocenili na 561.133.594 EUR.
The Slovak authorities estimated the total direct damage at EUR 561 133 594.
Ta znesek pomeni 0,8902 % slovaškega bruto nacionalnega dohodka.
This amount represents 0,8902 % of Slovakia's GNI.
Madžarska je za pomoč iz solidarnostnega sklada zaprosila po enomesečnem skoraj nepretrganem deževju maja in junija 2010, ki je povzročilo hude poplave in ogromno škodo v kmetijskem in podjetniškem sektorju, v stanovanjskih naseljih ter na cestnem omrežju in drugi infrastrukturi, pri čemer so bili najbolj prizadeti severovzhodni in osrednji predeli države.
Hungary applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund following one month of near-continuous rainfall in May and June 2010 leading to severe flooding causing widespread damage to the agricultural sector, residential properties and businesses, to the road network and other infrastructure with the north-eastern and central parts of the country being particularly badly affected.
Madžarski organi so skupno neposredno škodo ocenili na 719.343.706 EUR.
The Hungarian authorities estimated the total direct damage at EUR 719 343 706.
Ta znesek pomeni 0,7307 % madžarskega bruto nacionalnega dohodka.
This amount represents 0,7307 % of Hungary's GNI.
Češka republika je za pomoč iz solidarnostnega sklada zaprosila, ko so njeno ozemlje maja in junija 2010 prizadele hude nevihte.
The Czech Republic applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund after its territory was hit by severe torrential rains during May and June 2010.
Povzročile so dva povezana poplavna vala, ki sta prizadela severovzhodna območja ter povzročila škodo v stanovanjskih naseljih in v podjetniškem sektorju, na cestnem omrežju in drugi infrastrukturi.
These rains resulted in two interconnected waves of floods which affected the North-Eastern part of the territory causing damages to residential properties and businesses, to the road network and other infrastructure.
Češki organi so skupno neposredno škodo ocenili na 204.456.041 EUR.
The Czech authorities estimated the total direct damage caused by the disaster at EUR 204 456 041.
Vendar so Češko prizadele iste poplave, ki so povzročile tudi večje nesreče na Poljskem in Slovaškem.
However, the Czech Republic was affected by the same flooding disaster which led to the major disaster in Poland and Slovakia.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je izpolnjen pogoj iz drugega pododstavka člena 2(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002, po katerem lahko izjemoma prejme pomoč iz Solidarnostnega sklada tudi država, ki jo je prizadela ista večja nesreča kot sosednjo državo.
Therefore, the condition set out in Article 2(2) second subparagraph of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, whereby a country affected by the same major disaster as a neighbouring country may exceptionally benefit from Solidarity Fund aid, was found to be met.
Hrvaška je zaprosila za pomoč iz solidarnostnega sklada po močnem deževju s točo in nevihtami v maju in juniju 2010, zaradi katerega so nastale hude poplave v vzhodnem in osrednjem delu države.
Croatia applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund following intense rain with hail and thunderstorms in May and June 2010 causing severe floods that struck eastern and central parts of the country.
Nesreča je povzročila občutno škodo v kmetijskem sektorju, na javnem in zasebnem premoženju in prometni infrastrukturi.
The disaster caused significant damages to the agriculture sector, public and private property and the transport infrastructure.
Hrvaški organi so skupno neposredno škodo ocenili na 153.039.303 EUR.
The Croatian authorities estimated the total direct damage caused by the disaster at EUR 153 039 303.
Ker je ta znesek pod pragom 275,804 milijona EUR (tj.
As this amount is below the threshold of EUR 275.804 million (i.e. 0,6 % of Croatia's GNI) the disaster does not qualify as a “major natural disaster” according to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002.
0,6 % hrvaškega BND), nesreče ni mogoče opredeliti kot „večje naravne nesreče“ v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002.
However, Croatia was affected by the same flooding disaster which led to the major disaster in Hungary.
Ker pa so Hrvaško prizadele iste poplave, ki so povzročile večjo nesrečo na Madžarskem, je izpolnjen pogoj iz drugega pododstavka člena 2(2) uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002, po katerem lahko država izjemoma prejme pomoč iz sklada, kadar jo prizadene ista večja nesreča kot sosednjo državo.
Therefore, the condition set out in Article 2(2) second subparagraph of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, whereby a country affected by the same major disaster as a neighbouring country may exceptionally benefit from Solidarity Fund aid, was found to be met.
Kot država v procesu pogajanj o pristopu k EU je Hrvaška upravičena do pomoči iz Solidarnostnega sklada EU.
As a country in the process of negotiating its accession to the EU Croatia is eligible for EU Solidarity Fund assistance.
Romunija je za pomoč iz solidarnostnega sklada zaprosila, potem ko so večji del njenega ozemlja junija in julija 2010 prizadele hude poplave in plazovi.
Romania applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund after in June and July 2010 the major part of the Romanian territory was affected by heavy flooding and land slides.
Nesreča je povzročila občutno škodo na infrastrukturi, v kmetijskem sektorju ter na javnem in zasebnem premoženju.
The disaster caused significant damages to infrastructure, to the agricultural sector and to private and public property.
Romunski organi so skupno neposredno škodo ocenili na 875.757.770 EUR.
The Romanian authorities estimated the total direct damage at EUR 875 757 770.
Zato je mogoče nesrečo opredeliti kot „večjo naravno nesrečo“ in sodi na glavno področje uporabe uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002.
Therefore the disaster qualifies as a “major natural disaster” and falls within the main field of application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002.
Potem ko je Komisija preverila, ali vse vloge izpolnjujejo merila za upravičenost iz uredbe (ES) št. 2012/2002, je predlagala uporabo sredstev iz solidarnostnega sklada v znesku 105.567.155 EUR za Poljsko, 20.430.841 EUR za Slovaško, 22.485.772 EUR za Madžarsko, 5.111.401 EUR za Češko republiko, 3.825.983 EUR za Hrvaško in 24.967.741 EUR za Romunijo, kar skupaj znaša 182.388.893 EUR za prevzem obveznosti in plačila.
After verifying that all applications comply with the eligibility criteria of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 the Commission proposed to mobilise the Solidarity Fund for an amount of EUR 105 567 155 for Poland, EUR 20 430 841 for Slovakia, EUR 22 485 772 for Hungary, EUR 5 111 401 for the Czech Republic, EUR 3 825 983 for Croatia and EUR 24 967 741 for Romania resulting in a total amount of EUR 182 388 893 in commitment and payment appropriations.
V predlogu spremembe proračuna (št. 1/2011 z dne 14. januarja 2011) je zato predlagala naslednje:
Consequently, in the draft amending budget (DAB No 1/2011 of 14 January 2011) the Commission made the following proposal:
Postavka Člen
Article Item
Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije – Države v pristopnih pogajanji
European Union Solidarity Fund — Countries negotiating for accession
Poglavje 13 06 –skupaj
Chapter 13 06 — Total
Komisija s predložitvijo tega predloga za uporabo sklada začenja poenostavljeni postopek tristranskih pogovorov, kakor zahteva točka 26 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, da bi pridobila soglasje obeh vej proračunskega organa za uporabo sklada in za zahtevani znesek.
According to point 26 of the IIA, when presenting this proposal to deploy the Fund, the Commission initiates the simplified trilogue procedure in view of securing the agreement of the two arms of the Budgetary Authority on the need to use the Fund and the amount required.
V skladu z internim dogovorom z Odborom za regionalni razvoj (REGI) mora ta odbor sodelovati pri procesu, da bi konstruktivno podprl uporabo solidarnostnega sklada.
According to an internal agreement with the Committee on Regional Development (REGI), this committee should be associated to the process, in order to provide constructive support and contribution to the implementation of the Solidarity Fund.
Po oceni vlog je odbor REGI podal stališče v zvezi z uporabo sredstev sklada, kot je navedeno v priloženem mnenju.
Following the assessment of the requests, the REGI committee of the European Parliament gave its view on the mobilisation of the Fund, as expressed in the opinion attached to the present report.