natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nacionalna zakonodaja bi morala tudi upoštevati postopkovna jamstva za družinske člane državljanov EU.
The national legislation should also take account of the procedural safeguards enjoyed by family members in the EU.
Pozitivna ocena za predpise glede varovanja podatkov in njihovo izvajanje, čeprav bi bilo treba okrepiti človeške vire za opravljanje zadostnega števila inšpekcij.
The data protection legislation and implementation practice were considered acceptable, but it was found that more human resources are needed if a sufficient number of inspections are to be performed.
Zadovoljivo policijsko sodelovanje na lokalni, regionalni in osrednji ravni.
Police cooperation at central, regional and local levels was satisfactory.
Pristojni organi so uspeli najti rešitve za bistvene težave, in sicer z obnovo potniškega terminala, fizično ločitvijo potnikov in zadostnim številom zaposlenih.
The authorities had managed to address all the outstanding issues, notably renovation of the passenger terminal, physical separation of passenger flows, and increased staff numbers.
Različni organi, ki tudi uporabljajo SIS, so bili dobro pripravljeni, končni uporabniki pa ustrezno usposobljeni.
The different organisations involved in using the SIS were well prepared, and the end-users were well trained.
Odlična ocena za uporabo in kakovost mobilnih rešitev.
The use and quality of the mobile solutions were considered remarkable.
Oblikovanih nekaj manjših priporočil.
A few small recommendations were made.
Za državo je kar precejšen izziv, kako zagotoviti nadzor kopenske meje z Ukrajino, ki bo ustrezal standardom EU.
Slovakia faces a considerable challenge in bringing its controls at the land border with Ukraine up to EU standards.
Težave pri upravljanju in nadzoru meje: trenutna organizacija in izvedba ne ustrezata določilom zakonika o schengenskih mejah.
There were problems in border management and surveillance: current organisation and implementation do not meet the Schengen Borders Code requirements.
Ponovni obisk potreben na cestnem mejnem prehodu Vysne Nemecke, kjer infrastruktura, postopki in oprema niso ustrezali schengenskim zahtevam.
A revisit was needed to the road crossing point at Vysne Nemecke, where the infrastructure, procedures and equipment do not meet any of the Schengen requirements.
Zračna meja: ponovni obisk letališča Bratislava, kjer infrastruktura ni bila povsem v skladu s schengenskimi zahtevami.
Air borders: a revisit was required for Bratislava airport, where the infrastructure is not fully in line with the Schengen requirements.
Potrebne izboljšave pri znanju tujih jezikov, statistiki, vodstvenih spretnostih in postopkih mejne kontrole.
It was found necessary to improve language skills, statistics, managerial skills and border checking procedures.
Izdajanje vizumov: zadovoljiva ocena za dostopnost podatkov in usposobljenost zaposlenih.
Visa issuance: access management, information and staff training were found acceptable.
Pozornost je bilo treba nameniti vprašanju varnosti (prostorov, shranjevanja vizumskih nalepk), sedanji praksi skupinskih vizumskih vlog in ocenjevanju posameznih vlog.
Attention was required to security issues (premises, storage of visa stickers), to the current practice of accepting group visa applications, and to the assessment of individual applications.
Nacionalna zakonodaja bi morala tudi upoštevati postopkovna jamstva za družinske člane državljanov EU.
The national legislation should take account of the procedural safeguards enjoyed by family members in the EU.
Težava zaradi prevelikega števila vizumov, izdanih na meji.
There was a problem with the high number of visas issued at the border.
Pristojni organi so uspeli najti rešitve za večino pomanjkljivosti.
The authorities had made a significant effort to address the majority of the shortcomings.
Izboljšana infrastruktura, tehnična opremljenost, boljši postopki mejne kontrole, bolj profesionalni odnos in boljše znanje tujih jezikov zaposlenih na letališču Bratislava.
Improvements had been made for infrastructure, technical equipment, procedures for border checks, professionalism and foreign languages skills of staff at Bratislava airport.
Odpravljene vse pomanjkljivosti pri varovanju podatkov.
All the data protection shortcomings identified had been remedied.
Informacijska infrastruktura ocenjena kot domišljena in zelo razvita, podatkovni centri dobro opremljeni in ustrezno vodeni.
The IT infrastructure was considered to be well-thought-out and highly developed.
Končni uporabniki so ustrezno usposobljeni.
The data centres were found to be well-equipped and well-managed, and the end-users properly trained.
Oblikovanih nekaj manjših priporočil, ki se že izvajajo.
Recommendations were made on minor aspects: these are being implemented.
UGOTOVITVE POROČEVALCA
RAPPORTEUR'S CONCLUSIONS
Glede na zaključke evalvacije in ugotovitve potrebnih ponovnih obiskov skupin strokovnjakov poročevalec ugotavlja, da je nekaj zadev resda še odprtih in bodo torej v prihodnosti zahtevale dodatno pozornost, vendar pa ne ovirajo polnopravnega članstva držav članic v schengenskem območju.
Taking into account the results of the evaluations and the necessary revisits carried out by the expert teams, the rapporteur concludes that, although there are some outstanding issues that will require follow-up at some point in the future, they do not constitute an obstacle to full Schengen membership for these Member States.
Kljub temu Parlament izraža pričakovanje, da bodo te države članice Svet in Evropski parlament v naslednjih šestih mesecih pisno obvestile o nadaljnjih ukrepih, za katere se bodo odločile v zvezi s priporočili, in potrebnih spremembah, ki še potekajo.
Nevertheless, Parliament expects the Member States concerned to inform the Council and Parliament, in writing and in the course of the next six months, on the follow-up they intend to undertake regarding the recommendations and on the necessary changes that are still being made.
Poročevalec želi podčrtati, da odprava kontrol na notranjih mejah zahteva medsebojno zaupanje pri učinkovitem nadzoru zunanjih meja.
Your rapporteur stresses that the removal of controls at the internal borders requires the existence of mutual trust as regards effective controls at the external borders.
Varnost schengenskega območja je dejansko odvisna od tega, kako dosledno in učinkovito vsaka posamezna država članica izvaja kontrolo nad zunanjimi mejami, pa tudi od tega, ali je izmenjava podatkov preko SIS dobra in hitra.
In fact, the security of the Schengen area depends on the rigour and efficiency that each Member State applies to controls at its external borders, and, also, on the quality and rapidity of the exchange of information via the SIS.
Z vsako šibko točko ali neustreznim delovanjem katerega koli izmed teh elementov je ogrožena varnost Unije in učinkovitost schengenskega območja.
Any weakness or incorrect working of any of these elements is liable to jeopardise the security of the Union and the effectiveness of the Schengen area.
o skupnem stališču Sveta o sprejetju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 89/552/EGS o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (10076/6/2007 – C6‑0352/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (10076/6/2007 – C6‑0352/2007 ),
Sprejeta besedila , 13.12.2006, T6-0559/2006. predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0646 ),
Texts adopted, 13.12.2006, T6-0559/2006. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0646 ),
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2007)0170 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0170 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0442/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0442/2007 ),
Usklajevanje nekaterih predpisov držav članic o razširjanju televizijskih programov
Coordination of certain of the Member States’ provisions on television broadcasting
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta v zvezi s sklenitvijo sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Svetom Evrope o sodelovanju med Agencijo Evropske unije za temeljne pravice in Svetom Evrope
on the proposal for a Council decision relating to the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the Council of Europe on cooperation between the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and the Council of Europe
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2007)0478 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0478 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 v zvezi z prvim pododstavkom člena 300(2) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 308 in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0311/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0311/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0443/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0443/2007 ),
Spoštovanje in spodbujanje človekovih pravic sta temeljni načeli in glavna cilja Evropske unije, ki je vzporedno s Svetom Evrope razvila pravne instrumente za zaščito temeljnih človekovih pravic.
The respect and promotion of human rights constitute one of the founding principles and major objectives of the European Union which alongside the Council of Europe has developed its own legal instruments for the protection of fundamental human rights.
Sistem načel varovanja temeljnih pravic se je v EU razvil večinoma s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, potrjen pa je bil z izrecnim priznanjem v pogodbah o EU.
The EU system of principles of fundamental rights protection has mainly been developed by the case law of the Court of Justice and confirmed by the express recognition within the EU Treaties.
Zelo pomembno je zagotoviti, da se ta sistem varovanja človekovih pravic dodatno okrepi, hkrati pa se zavarujejo temeljna načela, kot so nediskriminacija, neizključevanje, spoštovanje svobode izražanja in veroizpovedi, svobode ugovora vesti ter socialnih in ekonomskih pravic.
However, it is of great significance to guarantee that this system of protection of human rights is further strengthened whilst safeguarding basic principles such as non- discrimination, non- exclusion, respect of freedom of expression and religion, freedom of conscience, as well as social and economic rights.
Agencija Evropske unije za temeljne pravice bi lahko institucijam, organom, uradom in agencijam Skupnosti in državam članicam ta varovala ponudila pri izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti.
The European Fundamental Rights Agency could provide the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Community and its Member States when implementing Community law with the above-mentioned safeguards.
Treba je priznati, da je bil v zadnjih petdesetih letih, od svojih zametkov in vzpostavitve dalje, Svet Evrope tisti, ki je s pomočjo naprednega dela na tem področju razvil izčrpen sistem predpisov, pravnih in sodnih instrumentov za zaščito in spodbujanje človekovih pravic in pravne države ter je pridobil obsežne izkušnje.
It is important to recognise that during the last fifty years, since its inception and establishment, it is the Council of Europe that has developed through its advanced work on the field a comprehensive system of norms, legal and judicial instruments for the protection and promotion of human rights and the rule of law and has gathered extensive experience.
Zato je treba cilj zaščite temeljnih pravic, ki je skupen tako Agenciji za temeljne pravice kot Svetu Evrope, doseči na pozitiven način in z dopolnjevanjem, treba se je izogniti podvajanju in vsaki možni slabitvi in razdrobitvi že utrjenega (sodnega in izvensodnega) sistema zaščite človekovih pravic in pravic posameznika, ki ga je vzpostavil Svet Evrope.
Therefore, the common aim of protection of fundamental rights shared by both FRA and the Council of Europe has to be achieved in a complementary and positive manner, duplication has to be avoided as well as any possibility of fragilisation and embrittlement of the well- established (judicial and not) system of human rights and individual rights protection put in place by the Council of Europe.
Kar zadeva sofinanciranje skupnih dejavnosti, bi se morali Svet, Agencija za temeljne pravice in Svet Evrope dogovoriti o natančnejših pravilih v zvezi z izvrševanjem člena 15 sporazuma, ki ureja dodelitev sredstev Svetu Evrope s strani Agencije, da se doseže popolna preglednost in se prepreči namigovanje o preveliki vzajemni odvisnosti med obema institucijama; eden od možnih predpogojev bi lahko bil zlasti ta, da so ta sredstva namenjena za dejavnosti, ki se izvajajo skupaj ter v sodelovanju s Svetom Evrope.
As regards the co-financing of mutual activities Council, FRA and Council of Europe should agree on more precise rules regarding the implementation of Article 15 of the Agreement which provides for grants to be received by the Council of Europe from the Agency, with the aim of achieving full transparency and avoiding any insinuation for excessive interdependence among the two institutions; in particular, a possible precondition could be that the relevant grants are ascribed for activities which are carried out jointly and in cooperation with the Council of Europe.;
Bistvenega pomena je, da se člen 7 sporazuma izvrši na način, ki bi institucijama dopuščal, da ob vzajemnem soglasju in ob spoštovanju svojih poslovnikov izmenjujeta največjo količino podatkov, ki je možna v okviru veljavnih določb o zaupnosti; izmenjanih podatkov ne bi smele uporabljati druge institucije, poleg tistih, ki so neposredno vključene v preučevanje obravnavanih vprašanj; prav tako ne bi smeli biti na razpolago institucijam ali agencijam tretjih držav, če ni jamstev in nadzorstva v zvezi z njihovo uporabo.
It is also essential to implement Article 7 of the Agreement in a way which would allow the two institutions to exchange, upon the mutual consent, as much data as possible with respect to their rules of procedure, to the widest extent possible under the applicable rules on confidentiality; the respective information should not be used by institutions other than the ones directly involved in the examination of the issues at stake; they should also not be made available to institutions or agencies of third countries, in the absence of guarantees and controls regarding their use..
Agencija za temeljne pravice bi morala zagotoviti, da EU ohranja in izpolnjuje svojo zavezo k spoštovanju temeljnih pravic v tretjih državah; treba jo je izvrševati v skladu z delovanjem in politiko pristojnih mednarodnih organizacij, kot so Združeni narodi, ali z različnimi mednarodnimi sporazumi, ki jih vključujejo.
FRA should ensure that the EU maintains and upholds its firm commitment for respect of the fundamental rights in third countries; these are to be carried out in agreement with the works and policies of the competent international organisations such as the UN or with different international agreements by which they are covered.
Zelo je pomembno, da je Evropski parlament vključen v ta postopek z rednimi poročili in da se Svet Evrope vpraša za mnenje pri vsakem pregledu ali oceni, ki se pripravi v zvezi z dopolnjevanjem, preprečevanjem podvajanja in preglednostjo dela obeh institucij.
However, it is of immense importance that the European Parliament is involved in this process through periodic reports and that the Council of Europe is consulted for all the reviews or assessments carried out regarding the complementarity, the non-duplication and transparency of the works of the two institutions.
Sodelovanje med Agencijo Evropske unije za temeljne pravice in Svetom Evrope
Cooperation between the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and the Council of Europe
o odobritvi Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah v Evropskem parlamentu
on the approval by the European Parliament of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union
PREDLOG SKLEPA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA................................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION................................................3
PRILOGA: LISTINA UNIJE O TEMELJNIH PRAVICAH...........................................5
ANNEX: THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION...........................5
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU......................................................17
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................20
– ob upoštevanju pisma svojega predsednika z dne 25. oktobra 2007,
– having regard to the letter from its President of 25 October 2007,
– ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, podpisane in razglašene v Nici 7. decembra 2000
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union signed and proclaimed in Nice on 7 December 2000
UL C 364, 18.12.00, str.
OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju svojega sklepa s 14. novembra 2000 o odobritvi osnutka Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah
– having regard to its decision of 14 November 2000 approving the draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
74 (poročilo Duff/Voggenhuber). ,
74 (Duff/Voggenhuber report). ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije s 23. oktobra 2002 o vplivu in prihodnjem statusu Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah
– having regard to its resolution of 23 October 2002 on the impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and its future status
432 (poročilo Duff). ,
432 (Duff report). ,
255 (poročilo Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado/Tsatsos). , zlasti odstavka 4 tega mnenja,
255 (Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado/Tsatsos report). , in particular paragraph 4 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z 12. januarja 2005 o Pogodbi o Ustavi za Evropo
– having regard to its resolution of 12 January 2005 on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z 11. julija 2007 o sklicu medvladne konference: mnenje Evropskega parlamenta (člen 48 Pogodbe o EU)
– having regard to its resolution of 11 July 2007 on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC): The European Parliament's opinion (Article 48 of the EU Treaty)
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2007)0328 (poročilo Leinen). , zlasti odstavkov 8, 12 in 17,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2007)0328 (Leinen report). , in particular paragraphs 8, 12 and 17 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju člena 6(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, kakor je bila spremenjena z osnutkom pogodbe o reformi, sprejete na medvladni konferenci leta 2007,
– having regard to Article 6, Paragraph 1 of the Treaty on European Union, as revised by the draft Reform Treaty agreed by the 2007 Intergovernmental Conference,
– ob upoštevanju člena 120(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 120(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0445/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0445/2007 ),
A. ker je s potrditvijo pravno zavezujočega statusa Listine o temeljnih pravicah pogodba o reformi zavarovala jedro največjega dosežka, ki ga predstavlja del II Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo,
A. whereas, by confirming the legally binding status of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the draft Reform Treaty has safeguarded the substance of the major achievement represented by Part II of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe,
B. ker je Evropski parlament že sprejel spremembe prvotne Listine o temeljnih pravicah, ki je bila 7. decembra 2000 slovesno razglašena v Nici, saj je v zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji s 24. septembra 2003 ocenil rezultate dela konvencije o prihodnosti Evrope ter je v resoluciji z 12. januarja 2005 odobril ustavno pogodbo, ki je rezultat dela medvladne konference v letu 2004,
B. whereas the European Parliament has already agreed to the adaptations made to the Charter of Fundamental Rights as originally solemnly proclaimed in Nice on 7 December 2000, when, in its above-mentioned resolution of 24 September 2003, it assessed the results of the work of the Convention on the Future of Europe and when, in its above-mentioned resolution of 12 January 2005, it approved the Constitutional Treaty resulting from the work of the 2004 Intergovernmental Conference (IGC),
C. ker je v zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji z 11. julija 2007, v kateri je podal svoje mnenje o sklicu medvladne konference v letu 2007, pozdravil dejstvo, da je mandat konference zaščitil pravno zavezujoč status Listine o temeljnih pravicah, ter izrazil resne pomisleke glede protokola št. 7, katerega namen je v nekaterih državah članicah omejiti možnost, da je listina predmet sodnih postopkov,
C. whereas, in its above-mentioned resolution of 11 July 2007, in giving its opinion on the convening of the 2007 IGC, it welcomed the fact that the IGC mandate safeguarded the legally binding status of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, while expressing its strong concerns about Protocol No 7, which seeks to limit the justiciability of the Charter in certain Member States,
D. ker je v odstavku 17 zgoraj omenjene resolucije z 11. julija 2007 poudaril, da namerava natančno preučiti rezultate medvladne konference v letu 2007, ko bo po podpisu pogodbe o reformi podal mnenje o njej,
D. whereas, in paragraph 17 of its above-mentioned resolution of 11 July 2007, it stressed its intention to carefully scrutinise the outcome of the 2007 IGC, when it will give its opinion on the Reform Treaty after the latter has been signed,
PRILOGA: LISTINA UNIJE O TEMELJNIH PRAVICAH
ANNEX: THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION
Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija slovesno razglašajo naslednje besedilo kot Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah:
The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission solemnly proclaim the following text as the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
LISTINA EVROPSKE UNIJE O TEMELJNIH PRAVICAH
CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Evropski narodi so pri oblikovanju vse tesnejše zveze odločeni na podlagi skupnih vrednot deliti mirno prihodnost.
The peoples of Europe, in creating an ever closer union among them, are resolved to share a peaceful future based on common values.
Unija, ki se zaveda svoje duhovne in moralne dediščine, temelji na nedeljivih in univerzalnih vrednotah človekovega dostojanstva, svobode, enakopravnosti in solidarnosti; temelji na načelu demokracije in na načelu pravne države.
Conscious of its spiritual and moral heritage, the Union is founded on the indivisible, universal values of human dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity; it is based on the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
Posameznika postavlja v središče svojih dejavnosti z vzpostavitvijo državljanstva Unije in oblikovanjem območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
It places the individual at the heart of its activities, by establishing the citizenship of the Union and by creating an area of freedom, security and justice.