natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1a. meni, da referenčni znesek, naveden v zakonodajnem predlogu, ni združljiv z zgornjo mejo podrazdelka 1a sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013, ne da bi ogrožal financiranje drugih prednostnih nalog; ugotavlja, da je Komisija objavila, da namerava novi organ za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij financirati v okviru podrazdelka 1a, in sicer delno s prerazporejanjem, delno pa s povečanjem sredstev za obdobje 2009–2013; poudarja pa, da proračunski organ do sedaj še ni bil obveščen, kako naj bi to izvedla, in torej še vedno ni jasno, katere programe ali prednostne naloge zadeva, kakšne posledice izhajajo iz tega v celotnem finančnem obdobju in ali bo v podrazdelku 1a ostala zadostna rezerva;
Considers that the reference amount indicated in the legislative proposal is not compatible with the ceiling of subheading 1a of the current Multiannual Financial Framework 2007 - 2013 without jeopardising the financing of other priorities; notes that the Commission has communicated its intention to finance the new European Electronic Communications Market Authority within subheading 1a partly through redeployment and partly by an increase for the period 2009-2013; points out, however, that the budgetary authority has not yet received any information as to the details of this exercise so that it remains unclear, to date, which programmes or priorities are affected and what consequences arise from this throughout the financial period and whether a sufficient margin will remain in subheading 1a;
1b. poudarja, da bo predlagani organ za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij izvajal tudi upravne naloge in bo v pomoč Komisiji; zato meni, da bi bilo za financiranje nove agencije treba preučiti vse možnosti v večletnem finančnem okviru 2007–2013, vključno z razdelkom 5, kjer se zdi, da so še na voljo zadostne rezerve;
Points out that the proposed European Electronic Communications Market Authority will also fulfil administrative tasks and assist the Commission; is consequently of the opinion that all possibilities of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2007 - 2013, including Heading 5 where sufficient margins still seem to be available, should be explored to finance the new Authority;
1c. poudarja, da se bodo za ustanovitev organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij uporabile določbe iz točke 47 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006; poudarja, da bo Parlament, če se zakonodajni organ odloči, da bo to agencijo ustanovil, začel pogajanja z drugo vejo proračunskega organa, da bi se pravočasno sklenil sporazum o financiranju te agencije v skladu z ustreznimi določbami medinstitucionalnega sporazuma;
Underlines that the provisions of Point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 17 May 2006 will apply for the setting-up of the European Electronic Communications Market Authority; stresses that, should the legislative authority decide in favour of the setting-up of such an agency, Parliament will enter into negotiations with the other arm of the budgetary authority with a view to coming to a timely agreement on the financing of this agency in line with the relevant provisions of the IIA;
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Electronic Communications Market Authority
Komisija za spodbujanje razvoja učinkovitega enotnega trga telekomunikacij v EU predlaga ustanovitev novega neodvisnega organa, ki bo deloval v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in s Komisijo.
In order to promote the development of an effective telecommunications single market in the EU the Commission is proposing a new independent Authority working in close cooperation with the national regulatory authorities (NRAs) and the Commission.
Novi organ, ki bo odgovarjal Evropskemu parlamentu, bo vključeval odbor regulatorjev, sestavljen iz vodij nacionalnih regulativnih organov vseh držav članic EU.
The new Authority, accountable to the European Parliament, will include a board of regulators comprising the heads of the national regulatory authorities of all EU Member States.
Komisiji bo zagotavljal strokovno svetovanje, izboljšal doslednost pri uporabi pravil EU ter deloval kot center strokovnega znanja za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve na ravni EU.
The new authority will provide expert advice to the Commission, improve consistency in the application of EU rules and act as a centre of expertise for electronic communication networks and services at EU level.
Prevzel naj bi tudi naloge Evropske agencije za varnost omrežij (ENISA) in tako odpravil veliko težav, ki so bile odkrite pri delovanju te agencije.
The new Authority would also take over the functions of the European Network Security Agency (ENISA), thereby overcoming many of the problems that have been identified in the operation of ENISA.
Člen 38(10) predloga določa, da razrešnico organu podeli Evropski parlament.
The proposal provides in Article 38(10) for discharge to be given by the European Parliament.
(12) To zahteva ustanovitev novega organa Skupnosti , organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij (v nadaljevanju „organ“).
(12) This calls for the establishment of a new Community body, the European Electronic Communications Market Authority (hereinafter the “Authority”).
Organ bi s pomočjo, ki jo zagotavlja Komisiji in nacionalnim regulativnim organom, učinkovito prispeval k dokončnemu oblikovanju notranjega trga.
The Authority would make an effective contribution to furthering the completion of the internal market through the assistance it provides to the Commission and the national regulatory authorities.
(12) To zahteva ustanovitev novega organa Skupnosti na temelju razširjene skupine evropskih regulatorjev (v nadaljevanju „organ“).
(12) This calls for the establishment of a new Community body, based on an enhanced European Regulators Group (ERG) (hereinafter the “Authority”).
Sodba velikega senata Sodišča evropskih skupnosti z dne 2. maja 2006 v primeru C-217/04 Združeno kraljestvo proti Parlamentu in Svetu pravi, da se člen 95 lahko uporablja za osnovo pri ustanavljanju organa Skupnosti.
The judgment of the ECJ Grand Chamber of 2 May 2006 in Case C-217/04 UK v Parliament and Council indicates that Article 95 can be used as a basis for establishment of a Community body.
To je podlaga za to, da se skupini evropskih regulatorjev podeli večje pristojnosti tako, da se ji da pravne značilnosti in s tem neodvisnost.
This gives ample grounds to give more powers to the ERG by giving it legal personality and therefore independence.
Neenotna uporaba z varnostjo povezanih določb Okvirne direktive in posebnih direktiv predstavlja tveganje, da se ogrozi nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga.
The smooth functioning of the internal market risks being undermined by a heterogeneous application of the security related provisions laid down in the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives.
Mnenje organa , ki zagotavlja tehnično svetovanje na zahtevo Komisije in držav članic, bi moralo pospešiti dosledno uporabo teh direktiv na nacionalni ravni.
The opinion of the Authority providing technical advice at the request of the Commission and the Member States should facilitate the consistent application of those directives at national level.
(24) Razširjena ENISA mora delovati kot center strokovnega znanja na evropski ravni glede vprašanj varnosti omrežij in informacij in pri tem zagotavljati smernice in svetovanje Evropskemu parlamentu, Komisiji ali pristojnim organom, ki jih imenujejo države članice.
(24) An extended ENISA should act as a centre of expertise at European level on network and information security issues, providing guidance and advice to the European Parliament, the Commission or competent bodies appointed by the Member States.
Varnost in obremenljivost komunikacijskih omrežij in informacijskih sistemov ostajata največja skrb za družbo in ključni element v regulativnem okviru EU za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve.
The security and resilience of communication networks and information systems remain a prime concern for society and a key element in the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services.
Mnenje agencije ENISA z razširjenim mandatom in vključeno v Generalni direktorat za informacijsko družbo in medije ter Generalni direktorat za pravico, svobodo in varnost , ki zagotavlja tehnično svetovanje na zahtevo Komisije in držav članic, bi moralo pospešiti dosledno uporabo teh direktiv na nacionalni ravni.
The opinion of ENISA, having an extended mandate, being embedded in both Directorate-General Information Society and Media and Directorate-General Justice, Freedom and Security, and providing technical advice at the request of the Commission and the Member States should facilitate the consistent application of those directives at national level.
Mandat agencije ENISA poteče v letu 2009 in če drug organ ne bo prevzel njenih sedanjih nalog, ne bo mogoče nadzorovati in ustrezno obravnavati varnosti evropskih omrežij in informacij.
ENISA's mandate runs out in 2009 and unless another body takes over its present duties, European Network and information security cannot be monitored and adequately dealt with.
Poleg tega trenutno poteka drugo ocenjevanje ENISA.
Moreover, a second evaluation of ENISA is currently taking place.
Dokončna odločitev o prihodnosti ENISA bi morala torej temeljiti na rezultatih tega ocenjevanja.
A definitive decision on ENISA's future should thus await the results of this evaluation.
Člen 1 – odstavek 1
Article 1 — paragraph 1
Razširjena skupina evropskih regulatorjev je ustanovljena kot organ s pristojnostmi, določenimi v tej uredbi.
An enhanced ERG is established as the authority with the responsibilities laid down in this Regulation.
Direktor pripravi letno poročilo o dejavnostih organa in izjavo o zanesljivosti.
The Director shall draw up an annual activity report for the Authority, together with a statement of assurance.
Notranji revizor Komisije je pristojen za revizijo sistemov notranjega nadzora organa.
The Internal Auditor of the Commission shall be responsible for auditing the Authority's internal control systems.
Finančna pravila, ki veljajo za organ, pripravi upravni odbor po posvetovanju s Komisijo.
Financial rules applicable to the Authority shall be drawn up by the Administrative Board after consultation with the Commission.
Ta pravila lahko odstopajo od Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002, če to zahtevajo posebne operativne potrebe za delovanje organa in le ob predhodnem soglasju Komisije.
Those rules may deviate from Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 if the specific operational needs for the functioning of the Authority so require and only with the prior agreement of the Commission.
Ta pravila lahko odstopajo samo od Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002, če to zahtevajo posebne operativne potrebe za delovanje organa in ob predhodni odobritvi Komisije.
Those rules may only deviate from Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 if the specific operational needs for the functioning of the Authority so require and with the prior consent of the Commission.
Namen predloga spremembe je uskladiti terminologijo z nedavnimi predlogi, ki zadevajo skupna podjetja.
To harmonise the terminology with that of recent proposals on Joint-Undertakings.
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on establishing the European Electronic Communications Market Authority
Razvoj učinkovitega enotnega trga telekomunikacij je ena najpomembnejših političnih nalog EU.
The establishment of a functioning internal market in telecommunications is a top political priority in the EU.
V prvem poročilu junija 2006 je Komisija predlagala spremembe regulativnega okvira.
The Commission, in its first report of June 2006, proposed changes to the legal framework.
Pri tem obsežnem in temeljitem pregledu je prišlo na dan več težav, ki še vedno niso odpravljene.
This comprehensive and thorough review revealed several problems that have still not been resolved.
Komisija za pomoč pri premagovanju teh ovir predlaga nov neodvisni organ, delujoč v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi (NRO) in Komisijo.
To help overcome these obstacles, the Commission proposes setting up a new, independent authority, to work closely with the national regulatory authorities (NRA) and the Commission.
Novi organ, ki bo odgovarjal Evropskemu parlamentu, bo vključeval odbor regulatorjev, sestavljen iz vodij nacionalnih regulativnih organov vseh držav članic EU, in bo nadomestil Skupino evropskih regulatorjev (SER).
It is intended to be accountable to the European Parliament, include a board of regulators comprising the heads of the national regulatory authorities of all EU Member States and replace the European Regulators Group (ERG).
Opravljal bo predvsem naslednje osnovne naloge:
It is to have the following main tasks:
· strokovno svetovanje Komisiji za zagotavljanje enotnejše rabe predpisov EU,
· providing expert advice to the Commission, to improve consistency in the application of EU rules,
· regulativni nadzor na področju opredelitve in analize trga ter uporabe korektivnih ukrepov,
· regulatory oversight of market definition, analysis and the implementation of remedies,
· opredelitev nadnacionalnih trgov,
· definition of trans-national markets,
· svetovanje glede usklajevanja radijskih frekvenc in odločanje o upravljanju številk,
· advice on radio frequency harmonisation and decision powers on numbering administration,
· delovanje kot center strokovnega znanja EU za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja,
· functioning as an EU advisory centre for electronic communications networks and services,
· zagotavljanje varnosti omrežja in informacij (tj. prevzem nalog Evropske agencije za varnost omrežij (ENISA)).
· providing network and information security (i.e. taking over the tasks of the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA)).
Svet je odločno zavrnil predlog Komisije.
This Commission proposal has met with a clear rejection in the Council.
V nadaljevanju je predstavljen tudi alternativni model združenja (mreže) nacionalnih regulativnih organov (angl. „Joint Body (Network) of National Regulatory Authorities“ ).
An alternative model of a Joint Body (Network) of National Regulatory Authorities is proposed below.
Mreža je pri tem združenje nacionalnih regulativnih organov brez statusa pravne osebe, kar pomeni, da ni del posredne ali neposredne notranje ureditve Skupnosti.
This network is an association of national regulatory authorities without a legal personality of its own, i.e. it is specifically not directly or indirectly part of Community administration.
Za razliko od predloga Komisije se ta predlog osredotoča predvsem na vpeljavo postopka za skupno sprejemanje odločitev nacionalnih regulativnih organov, za katere velja nacionalna zakonodaja.
In contrast to the Commission proposal, the emphasis is on establishing a procedure for joint decision-making by regulatory authorities that are subject to national law.
Mreža nacionalnih regulativnih organov ne bi ustanovila organa na ravni ES, niti ne bi od institucij prevzela pooblastil za sprejemanje odločitev.
The network of national regulatory authorities would mean that an EU-level authority would not be set up, and EC institutions’ decision-making powers would not be delegated.
Regulativne pristojnosti mreže je treba opredeliti in zapisati tudi v okvirni direktivi.
The regulatory powers of the network must be enshrined and defined in the framework directive, over and above this regulation.
Mreža lahko na lastno pobudo ali na podlagi določb, ki veljajo za direktive, izraža mnenje ali podaja skupno stališče s področja nalog, ki so ji dodeljene na osnovi okvirne direktive.
The network should, on its own initiative or – if the directive expressly lays down this provision – adopt opinions and common positions in connection with the remit which, under the framework directive, is the responsibility of the national regulatory authorities.
Skupna stališča morajo biti za nacionalne regulativne organe enako zavezujoča kot priporočila Komisije, kar pomeni, da jih je treba v čim večji meri upoštevati pri sprejemanju odločitev.
These common positions should be just as binding on the national regulatory authorities as under the Commission recommendation, i.e. each decision-making process would have to take them into account as far as possible.
Sklepi mreže se morajo sprejemati z večino, pri čemer bi vsakemu nacionalnemu regulativnemu organu pripadel en glas.
Network decisions would have to be taken by a majority, with each national regulatory authority having a vote.
Mreži se zaupajo osnovne naloge, ki so navedene v predlogu Komisije.
The network should have the same main tasks as those set out in the Commission proposal.
Mreža bi morala Evropskemu parlamentu predložiti letno poročilo svojih dejavnostih.
The network would be obliged to submit an annual report to the European Parliament.
Da bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti neodvisnost mreže nacionalnih regulativnih organov od finančnih sredstev in virov držav članic, mora financiranje mreže prevzeti Skupnost.
To guarantee the independence of the network of national regulatory authorities from Member States’ financial and material resources, funding from the Community must be made possible.
Mreža nima statusa pravne osebe, zato je izključena možnost neposredne dodelitve sredstev.
The network has no legal personality, so it cannot receive funds directly.
Zato mora Skupnost zagotoviti posreden način financiranja, predvsem s pripravo sredstev v obliki ustreznih upravnih virov.
Therefore ‘indirect’ funding must be provided, primarily through making material resources available from the Community, in the form of appropriate administrative resources.
Sekretariat mreže nacionalnih regulativnih organov ( Office of the Network of National Regulatory Authorities ) bi prevzel vlogo nosilca uprave brez statusa pravne osebe.
Accordingly, an administrative body without legal personality would be set up in the form of an Office of the Network of National Regulatory Authorities .
Ker imajo nacionalni regulativni organi zaradi pristopa, usmerjenega v postopek, širok manevrski prostor, je treba v postopku uravnavanja trga zagotoviti minimalno mero koordiniranja.
Because of the national regulatory authorities’ wide room for manoeuvre as a result of the procedural approach to regulation, a minimum level of coordination is needed in the market regulation procedure.
Zaradi naloge notranjega trga, ki mora odpraviti težave z dostopom, je treba ubrati v praksi preverjen regulativni pristop „bottom-up“ , ki učinkovito zajame informacije o dejanskih težavah pri dostopu in nato na podlagi dobljenih rezultatov usklajuje korektivne ukrepe med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi.
The single market task of removing obstacles to access requires a practical, effective, bottom-up regulatory strategy , to collect information efficiently on actual problems with access and on that basis to coordinate remedies between the national regulatory authorities.
Z morebitnimi vzroki za težave na notranjem trgu se lahko najučinkoviteje spopadejo nacionalni regulativni organi v lastni državi, rešitve pa morajo nato obvezno usklajevati v okviru predlaganega skupnega postopka v mreži nacionalnih regulativnih organov.
Any causes of obstacles to the single market are most effectively overcome by the national regulatory authorities on the ground, and they then have a duty to coordinate the solutions in the context of the proposed procedure of the Network of National Regulatory Authorities, which would be enshrined in Community law.
Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij
Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Electronic Communications Market Authority
Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi mreže nacionalnih regulativnih organov za trge elektronskih komunikacij
Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Network of National Regulatory Authorities for Electronic Communications Markets
(Predlog spremembe velja za celotno besedilo.
(This amendment applies to the whole text.
V primeru sprejema predloga spremembe je treba vnesti ustrezne spremembe v celotno besedilo).
Adoption of the amendment will require corresponding amendments to the whole text.)
(3) Z Uredbo (ES) št. 460/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. marca 2004 o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost omrežij in informacij (v nadaljevanju „Uredba o agenciji ENISA“) je bila leta 2004 za obdobje petih let ustanovljena Evropska agencija za varnost omrežij in informacij (ENISA – European Network and Information Security Agency) s ciljem zagotoviti visoko in učinkovito raven varnosti omrežij in informacij znotraj Skupnosti, z namenom, da se razvije kultura varnosti omrežij in informacij v korist državljanov, potrošnikov, podjetij in organizacij javnega sektorja Evropske unije ter tako prispeva k nemotenemu delovanju notranjega trga.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency (hereinafter “ENISA Regulation”) established the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) in 2004 for a period of five years, with the goal of ensuring a high and effective level of network and information security within the Community, in order to develop a culture of network and information security for the benefit of the citizens, consumers, enterprises and public sector organisations of the European Union, thus contributing to the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Vsaka sprememba ciljev, strukture in organizacije agencije ENISA bo zato predmet prihodnje revizije Uredbe o agenciji ENISA.
Any modification of the goals, structure and organisation of ENISA will therefore be subject to the future revision of ENISA Regulation.
Cilji in naloge organa, ki ga predlaga Komisija, se razlikujejo od ključnih funkcij ENISE.
The objectives and tasks of the Authority proposed by the Commission are distinguished from the key functions of ENISA.
Ohranitev ENISE je skladna z oceno iz leta 2007, zato ustanovitev tega novega organa ali katerega koli drugega evropskega omrežja ne vpliva na ohranitev ENISE.
The need for the continuation of ENISA is conformed in the recent 2007 evaluation and therefore the esstablishement of the new Authority or any other European Network is without prejudice to the continuation of ENISA.
(7) Zato je potrebna trdnejša institucionalna podlaga za ustanovitev organa na podlagi nadaljnjega razvoja skupine evropskih regulatorjev , ki združuje strokovno znanje in izkušnje nacionalnih regulativnih organov, skupaj z jasno določenimi pristojnostmi, ob upoštevanju potrebe, da ima ta organ resnično avtoriteto v očeh njegovih članov in sektorja, ki se upravlja na podlagi kakovosti njegovih rezultatov.
(7) A more substantial institutional basis for the establishment of a body on the basis of further development of the ERG , bringing together the expertise and experience of the national regulatory authorities, together with a clearly defined set of competencies, is therefore called for, taking account of the need for this body to exercise real authority in the eyes of its members and the sector being regulated through the quality of its output.
(7a) To zahteva ustanovitev novega organa Skupnosti, evropske mreže nacionalnih regulativnih organov za trg elektronskih komunikacij (mreža).
(7a) This calls for the establishment of a new Community body, a European Network of National Regulatory Authorities for Electronic Communications Markets (the Network).