natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
42. meni, da neposrednih plačil ni več možno utemeljiti brez navzkrižne skladnosti; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da mora EU novim državam članicam v prehodnem obdobju pomagati pri izvajanju pravil navzkrižne skladnosti;
Considers that direct payments without cross-compliance (CC) can no longer be justified; emphasises in that respect that the new Member States must be assisted by the EU in the application of the CC rules in the course of a transitional period;
45. poziva k večji učinkovitosti pri doseganju ciljev in enotnejšemu izvajanju navzkrižne skladnosti v državah članicah; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi jasnejše smernice za pomoč državam članicam pri izvajanju;
Calls for a greater effectiveness of CC in relation to its objectives and a more homogeneous implementation across the Member States; calls on the Commission to develop clearer guidelines to assist the Member States in implementation;
49. poziva Komisijo, naj pospešeno nadaljuje poenostavljanje skupne kmetijske politike in ob tem redno pregleduje zakonodajo in določi, ali je potrebna in ali so njene določbe primerne; v zvezi s tem naj predlaga dodatne ukrepe, na primer poenostavljena pravila prenosa za pravice do plačila pri neizkoriščenosti, spojitev manjših pravic do plačila, uvedbo enotne premije za manjše prejemnike, poenostavitev pravil za nacionalno rezervo ali njeno zmanjšanje ali ukinitev v odvisnosti od prehoda na regionalno/nacionalno enotno premijo na površino, opustitev propada pravic do plačila pri neuporabi, ukinitev ročno napisanih registrov goveda in druge živine;
Calls on the Commission to press on with the simplification of the CAP and, in so doing, regularly to review items of legislation to determine whether they are necessary and whether their actual provisions are expedient; in that connection it should propose additional measures, such as simplified transfer rules for payment entitlements in the event of non-activation, merging of minimum payment entitlements, introduction of a single premium in the case of small recipients, simplification, reduction or abolition of the rules governing the national reserve, depending on the transition to the regional/national single area payment, waiving the cancellation of payment entitlements in the event of non-use, abolition of handwritten registries for cattle and other livestock;
52. meni, da je dodatno preprečevanje tveganj kot varnostna mreža ključnega pomena zaradi pričakovanega povečanja okoljskih in podnebnih nevarnosti, nevarnosti epidemij in velikega nihanja cen na kmetijskih trgih;
Considers that, in view of the anticipated increase in environmental and climate dangers and in the risk of epidemics and considerable price fluctuations in the agricultural markets, additional risk prevention is of vital importance as a safety net;
59. meni, da je verjetno treba dati sektorskim rešitvam (primerljivim z rešitvami v sektorju sadja in zelenjave) zaradi povsem različnih razmer v posameznih sektorjih prednost pred horizontalnimi pristopi;
Considers that, in view of the completely different conditions in the individual sectors, different sectoral solutions (comparable to the solution in the fruit and vegetable sector) are probably preferable to horizontal approaches;
63. poziva Komisijo, naj do 30. junija 2011 predloži izčrpno analizo obstoječih sistemov obvladovanja tveganj in možnosti njihovega nadaljnjega razvoja na ravni Skupnosti po letu 2013;
Calls on the Commission to submit, by 30 June 2010, a comprehensive analysis of existing risk management systems and possibilities for their further development at Community level after 2013;
Modulacija/zgornja meja/degresivnost/najnižji prag
Modulation/capping ceiling/degressivity/minimum threshold
69. poziva, da sredstva z naslova degresivnosti ostanejo v regijah zadevne države članice in se tam na primer uporabijo za ukrepe po členu 69 ali iz drugega stebra; poziva, naj se ta sredstva neposredno namenijo kmetom;
Calls for any funds resulting from degressivity to be kept in the regions or Member State concerned where they will be, for example, used to finance measures in accordance with Article 69 or under the second pillar; calls for these funds to be focused directly on farmers;
71. vendar podpira prizadevanja Komisije, da zagotovi ustrezno financiranje trajnostne politike za podeželje v drugem stebru skupne kmetijske politike, čeprav ta cilj ne sme biti dosežen na račun prvega stebra;
Does, however, support the efforts of the Commission to secure appropriate financing for a sustainable policy for rural areas under the second pillar of the CAP, albeit that objective must not be attained at the expense of the first pillar;
sredstva iz progresivne modulacije se razdelijo v skladu z veljavnimi pravili za modulacijske sklade in ostanejo v regiji države članice, v kateri so nastala;
The funds from the progressive modulation are to be distributed according to the prevailing rules governing modulation funds and to remain in the regions or Member State in which they accrue;
Evropski parlament lahko predstavlja progresivno modulacijo v takšni obliki:
The European Parliament could envisage a progressive modulation in the following form:
neposredna plačila od 10 000 do 100 000 EUR – 1% (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
Direct payments of EUR 10 000 - 100 000 - 1% (for the whole 2009-2013 period)
neposredna plačila od 100 000 do 200 000 EUR – 2% (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
Direct payments of EUR 100 000 - 200 000 - 2% (for the whole 2009-2013 period)
neposredna plačila od 200 000 do 300 000 € – 3% (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
Direct payments of EUR 200 000 - 300 000 - 3% (for the whole 2009-2013 period)
neposredna plačila nad 300 000 EUR – 4% (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
Direct payments of over EUR 300 000 - 4% (for the whole 2009-2013 period)
Ureditev trga z mlekom
Milk market organisation
80. poleg tega poziva k znatnemu znižanju dodatnih dajatev za mlečno leto 2009/2010 in nadaljnjim znižanjem v naslednjih letih, da omeji porast cen kvot, ter k naknadnemu vseevropskemu saldiranju, ki bo omogočilo njihov boljši izkoristek;
Calls, furthermore, for a substantial reduction in the super-levy for the 2009/2010 milk year and further decreases in subsequent years in order to counterbalance a rise in quota prices and for Europe‑wide ex‑post offsetting of quotas in order to enable quotas to be better utilised;
83. meni, da bi krepitev združenj proizvajalcev ter sektorskih in medpanožnih organizacij lahko bila nadaljnja sestavina revidiranega člena 69;
Considers that strengthening of producer associations, sectoral and inter-professional organisations could constitute a further element of the revised Article 69;
86. opozarja, da sta moč in prihodnost evropskega kmetijstva v regionalnih, tradicionalnih in drugih priznanih visokokakovostnih proizvodih ter proizvodih z dodano vrednostjo;
Points out that the strengths, and the future, of European agriculture are to be found in regional, traditional and other recognised high quality products and value added products;
89. poziva Komisijo, naj v postopku proračunskih prilagoditev poveča sredstva, predvidena za informacijske in promocijske kampanje na notranjem trgu in zunanjih trgih;
Calls on the Commission to increase, as part of a budget adjustment process, the appropriations earmarked for information and promotion campaigns on the internal market and external markets;
94. opozarja, da evropsko kmetijstvo tudi v prihodnje ne bo moglo shajati brez primerne zunanje zaščite; zato poziva k uporabi enakih kakovostnih in varnostnih standardov za proizvode iz tretjih držav, kot veljajo za proizvode EU;
Points out that European agriculture will not be a going concern in future without appropriate external protection; calls, therefore, for application of the same quality and safety standards to third-country products as to EU products;
98. opozarja, da je prispevek kmetijstva k učinku tople grede (kot viru dveh močnih toplogrednih plinov: metana in dušikovega oksida) omejen in se v EU zmanjšuje zaradi izvajanja ukrepov, ki že veljajo v okviru skupne kmetijske politike, kot so navzkrižna skladnost, kmetijski okoljski programi in drugi ukrepi za razvoj podeželja;
Recalls that agriculture’s contribution to the greenhouse effect (as a source of two powerful greenhouse gases: methane and nitrous oxide) is limited and diminishing in the EU due to the implementation of measures already in place within the CAP framework such as CC, agri-environmental schemes and other rural development measures;
101. poudarja, da je kmetijska dejavnost močno povezana s kakovostjo in količino vode, in tudi, da je treba obremenitve vodnega okolja s kmetijstvom urejati trajnostno; meni, da bi morala biti okoljska zakonodaja v povezavi z načelom, da plača povzročitelj obremenitve, vodilno načelo pri učinkovitem doseganju trajnostnega upravljanja z vodo in okoljskih ciljev;
Underlines the strong relationship between agricultural activity and water quality and quantity, and stresses that pressures from agriculture on the water environment need to be managed in a sustainable manner; believes that environmental legislation in combination with the 'polluter pays' principle should be the guiding principle for the effective achievement of sustainable water management and environmental objectives;
106. poziva Komisijo, naj predloži skladne predloge za ohranitev in razvoj trajnostne kmetijske dejavnosti, zlasti na zapostavljenih območjih in tistih z naravnimi ovirami, ker so pomembna za zaščito biotske raznovrstnosti in ohranjanje ekosistemov;
Urges the Commission to present a coherent set of proposals in order to maintain and develop sustainable agricultural activity especially in less favoured areas and areas with natural handicaps, as these are of crucial importance for protecting biodiversity and preserving ecosystems;
Skupna kmetijska politika je od leta 1992 doživela tri temeljite reforme.
The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has undergone three fundamental reforms since 1992.
Cilji vseh reform so bili:
The aim of all these reforms was:
· izboljšanje učinkovitosti in preglednosti skupne kmetijske politike,
· to improve the efficiency and transparency of the CAP,
· povečanje tržne naravnanosti kmetov,
· to increase the market orientation of farmers,
· vključitev novih dejavnikov, zlasti okoljskih vidikov in vidikov zaščite živali, v skupno kmetijsko politiko in
· to better integrate new elements – in particular environmental and animal protection aspects – into the general agricultural policy, and
· krepitev podeželja.
· to boost rural areas.
Prejšnji sistem podpore cen, ki mu ni uspelo rešiti problema majhnih dohodkov kmetov in ki je privedel do velikih presežkov, ki jih je bilo mogoče odpraviti zgolj s pomočjo nadaljnjih subvencij na svetovnih trgih, je postopno zamenjal t.i. sistem neposrednih plačil.
The earlier system of price support, which was unable to solve the problem of farmers’ low incomes and, moreover, led to large surpluses which could only be disposed of on world markets with the aid of further subsidies, has been gradually replaced by a system of direct payments.
V središču sedanje podpore kmetom je neposredno plačilo, ki je bilo uvedeno z reformo ob vmesnem pregledu leta 2003 in katerega dodelitev ni odvisna od določene proizvodnje (nevezano neposredno plačilo).
At the heart of the current support for farmers is a direct payment, introduced in the 2003 Mid-Term Review Reform, which is granted independently of any stipulated production (decoupled direct payment).
Posamezne pravice do plačila temeljijo na preteklih plačilih, ki so jih kmetje prejeli v določenih referenčnih obdobjih pred začetkom reforme.
Individual claims are based on historical payments made to farmers during particular reference periods before the reform came into force.
Ta plačila je bilo za obdobje 2003–2013 mogoče plačati z enotnim plačilom.
It was possible for these to be paid as a single payment for the period 2003 to 2013.
Vendar večina držav članic uporablja različne modele enotnih premij na površino, ki se precej razlikujejo od pravic do plačil iz preteklosti.
However, most Member States apply different models of payment by surface area which involve considerably different entitlements from those in the past.
Ta so pomembna le pri določanju skupnega zneska, ki je na voljo posamezni državi članici ali regiji.
The latter are only relevant in determining the total amount available to a Member State or region.
Tudi sedanji sistem omogoča ohranitev plačil, ki so v celoti ali delno vezana na proizvodnjo, pri čemer države članice uporabljajo različne omejitve.
Payments which are totally or partially coupled to production can also be maintained in the present system; Member States have made use of their margins to differing degrees in this matter.
Za javno podporo je moral kmet dokazati, da izpolnjuje bistvene zahteve Skupnosti in/ali nacionalne zahteve glede dobre kmetijske prakse (navzkrižna skladnost).
Public funding was tied to the provision of proof that a farmer was adhering to essential Community and/or national requirements concerning good agricultural practice (cross-compliance (CC)).
Ti standardi vključujejo pomembne vidike kmetijske prakse, ki upošteva okolje, zdravje in dobro počutje živali.
These standards cover essential aspects of agricultural practice undertaken with concern for the environment, health and animal welfare.
Nove države članice bodo do leta 2013 (Romunija in Bolgarija do 2015) popolnoma vključene v sistem neposrednih plačil.
The new Member States will become completely integrated into the direct payments system by 2013 (2015 for RO and BU).
Za t.i. drugi steber, tj. za politiko razvoja podeželja, so bila s prerazporeditvijo zagotovljena dodatna sredstva (največ 5-odstotna modulacija).
Extra resources have been made available for the second pillar – concerning rural development – through redeployment (max.
Večkrat se je pokazalo, da imajo ravno države članice, ki bi zelo potrebovale ukrepe za razvoj podeželja, težave z zagotavljanjem sredstev sofinanciranja.
The overall financial framework of the second pillar has lagged behind the European Parliament’s demands, and there have been repeated instances of Member States in great need of rural development measures having problems providing cofinancing resources.
Pomembne ureditve trgov, kot so trgi sladkorja, banan, sadja in zelenjave ter vina, so bile (ali bodo) z enakimi cilji reformirane od leta 2004.
Important market organisations such as sugar, bananas, fruit and vegetables and wine have been (or will be) reformed with the same objectives since 2004.
Ureditev trga mleka s kvoto za mleko kot bistvenim instrumentom je ostala v veliki meri nespremenjena, vendar bo potekla leta 2015.
The milk market organisation, with the milk quota as a prominent instrument, was left largely unchanged but will cease to exist in 2015.
Tako bodo letos odhodki skupne kmetijske politike precej nižji od njenega prvotnega proračuna, saj zaradi gibanja cen v kmetijstvu ne bodo sprejeti ukrepi za podporo trgu, kot so intervencije ali preostale izvozne subvencije.
As a result, spending this year within the CAP will be considerably below its initial budget, as market support measures such as intervention or the remaining export subsidies will not be employed because of trends in agricultural prices.
To pomeni, da proračun za kmetijstvo prvič od ustanovitve Skupnosti ne bo več največja proračunska postavka v proračunu EU.
This means that, for the first time since the Community was founded, the agricultural budget is no longer the largest heading in the EU budget.
Proračunska disciplina in skromno povečanje kmetijskega proračuna pomenita, da se bo relativni delež odhodkov Skupnosti za kmetijstvo še zmanjšal, neposredna plačila na kmeta pa se bodo relativno zmanjšala za 10–20 % (vključno z modulacijo).
Budgetary discipline and a limited increase in the agricultural budget mean that the relative share of Community spending on agriculture will be further reduced, with the direct payments per farmer showing a relative decrease of 10 - 20% (including modulation).
Komisija je pripravila sporočilo, v katerem pravzaprav predlaga nadaljevanje v smeri, ki je bila sprejeta z reformo iz leta 2003.
The Commission has now produced a communication in which it proposes, essentially, to continue in the direction adopted by the 2003 reform.
T.i. sistematski pregled je odgovor Komisije na poziv voditeljev držav in vlad decembra 2005 k analizi vseh odhodkov EU, s posebnim poudarkom na odhodkih za kmetijstvo.
This 'health check' is the Commission's way of responding to the call from heads of state and government in December 2005 to analyse all EU expenditure, with a special emphasis on agricultural spending.
Skupni odhodki skupne kmetijske politike pravzaprav niso predmet predloženega sporočila, ampak so prepuščeni sistematskemu pregledu proračuna.
The total spending on the CAP is not, in fact, the subject of the communication but is restricted to the health check of the budget.
Glavni predlogi Komisije so:
The main Commission proposals are:
· nadaljnja nevezanost,
· further decoupling,
· hitrejši prehod na pavšalno stopnjo na površino pri neposrednih plačilih,
· a faster move to an area-based flat rate for direct payments,
· odprava manjših ukrepov, vezanih na proizvodnjo, ali njihova vključitev v sistem nevezanih neposrednih plačil,
· the abolition of smaller, production-based measures or their integration into the system of decoupled direct payments,
· nadaljnja modulacija,
· further modulation,
· degresivnost neposredne podpore in zvišanje najnižjih pragov za plačila,
· degressivity of direct support and an increase in minimum thresholds for payments,
· zaveza k opustitvi kvote za mleko in priprava „mehkega pristanka”.
· a commitment to ending the milk quota and paving the way for a soft landing.
Poročevalec podpira koncept večfunkcionalnega in univerzalnega kmetijstva, razširjenega po vsej Evropi.
The rapporteur upholds the concept of multifunctional, broad‑based agriculture spread throughout Europe.
Pozdravlja do sedaj prehojeno pot reform in je prepričan, da se je treba pospešeno lotiti procesa odpiranja trga in poenostavitve skupne kmetijske politike do leta 2013.
He welcomes the path of reform which has thus far been embarked upon and considers that the process of opening up the market and simplifying the CAP by 2013 must be pursued with all haste.
Poročevalec meni, da bo EU tudi v prihodnje potrebovala skupno kmetijsko politiko in da mora ta omogočati zadosten izbor instrumentov za okrepitev ključnih področij v kmetijskem sektorju, posredovati v smislu podpore v primerih kriz v zvezi s pridelki, okoljem in epidemijami, zagotoviti ozemeljsko skladnost in v skladu z lizbonskimi cilji nadaljevati z razvojem podeželja kot celote.
The rapporteur considers that the EU will also need a CAP in the future, and that the CAP must make available a sufficient array of instruments to strengthen important key areas of the agricultural sector, intervene in a supportive way in the event of crises concerning yields, the environment and epidemics, ensure territorial coherence and continue to develop rural areas as a whole, in accordance with the Lisbon objectives.
Podpira se pristop Komisije, po katerem bi se reforme iz leta 2003 zaključile pred razpravo o revolucionarni preureditvi skupne kmetijske politike ali sistemov plačil.
The Commission’s approach, whereby the 2003 reforms would be completed before a revolutionary restructuring of the CAP or the payment systems was discussed, is endorsed.
Poročevalec nasprotuje radikalni preureditvi plačil v tem trenutku.
The rapporteur does not consider that a radical restructuring of payments would be beneficial at this point.
Ena izmed glavnih funkcij sedanjih neposrednih plačil, s pomočjo katerih se poleg podpore dohodkov uresničujejo številni cilji, je pomagati kmetom pri prehodu s starega na novi sistem, ki je bistveno bolj tržno naravnan.
One of the main functions of the present direct payments, by means of which a large number of aims – alongside that of income support – are pursued, is to help farmers with the transition from the old system to the new, markedly more market-oriented structure.
Zato se revizija višine posameznih plačil ali celotnega proračuna ob vsakokratnem dvigu cen v kmetijstvu ne zdi smiselna.
It does not, therefore, seem sensible to review the size of individual payments or of the total budget every time agricultural prices rise.
Reforme iz leta 2003 se še zdaleč niso zaključile, razmere v Evropi pa še niso niti delno primerljive.
The 2003 reforms are a long way from being complete, and conditions in different parts of Europe are as yet not even partially comparable.
Po letu 2013 bo treba sistem neposrednih plačil in politiko razvoja podeželja verjetno precej preurediti na podlagi izkušenj, zbranih v prehodnem obdobju, medtem ko bi bilo treba čas do takrat porabiti za utrditev dosežkov prejšnjih reform, ne pa za razprave o financiranju, ki bi v vsakem primeru dale pičle rezultate.
After 2013, the system of direct payments and of rural development policy will probably need to be comprehensively restructured on the basis of experience gained during the transition phase, whilst the time until then should be used to consolidate the successes of previous reforms and not be taken up with discussions on financing, which would in any case produce scant results.
Kmetje v obdobju preoblikovanja in določanja nove smeri ter glede na precejšen dvig cen na svetovnih trgih namesto negotovosti potrebujejo varnost in zanesljivost naložb.
What farmers need, at this time of transformation and reorientation and in view of hefty price rises on world markets, is investment security and reliability rather than uncertainty.
Treba se je torej držati obljube voditeljev držav in vlad, da bodo skupni odhodki za tržne ukrepe ostali nespremenjeni do leta 2013.
Consequently, the pledge made by heads of state and government to leave the total expenditure for market measures untouched until 2013 must be adhered to.
Ločevanje/opustitev vezanih plačil/navzkrižna skladnost
Decoupling/ending coupled payments/cross-compliance
Trenutno so nekatera neposredna plačila še vedno vezana na proizvodnjo in se v državah članicah, ki uporabljajo kmetijski model, izračunavajo na podlagi preteklih referenčnih zneskov.
At the moment, some direct payments are still coupled to production and, in Member States which employ the farm model, calculated on the basis of past reference amounts.
Poročevalec podpira načrt Komisije glede čim hitrejše uvedbe enotne premije na površino na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni – po možnosti do leta 2013.
The rapporteur supports the Commission’s plan to have a single payment by surface area at national or regional level in place as soon as possible, and preferably by 2013.
Sedanji sistem je težko upravičiti pred javnostjo, poleg tega pa se je večina držav članic že odločila za izvajanje sistema premij na površino in opustitev sistema preteklih plačil.
The current system is difficult to justify to the general public, added to which most Member States have already decided to implement the system of payment by surface area and drop the system of historical payments.
Letno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča o odhodkih za leto 2006 kaže, da je upravljanje enotnih premij precej manj zapleteno za upravljanje in podvrženo napakam kot kmetijski model.
The annual report of the European Court of Auditors on spending in 2006 shows, moreover, that administering single payments by surface area is markedly less cumbersome and subject to error than the farm model.
Ohranitev modela preteklih plačil bi tudi precej otežila nadaljnje reforme po letu 2013.
Maintaining the historical model would also make further reforms after 2013 much more difficult.
Poročevalec načeloma podpira nadaljnje ločevanje, zlasti na področju pridelave rastlin, saj to prispeva k poenostavitvi kmetijske politike in izključuje napovedane negativne posledice, kot je izguba kultur, ki so pomembne za neko regijo ali okolje.
The rapporteur also supports further decoupling, in principle, particularly in the area of plant production, as this contributes to a simplification of agricultural policy and has not suffered from predicted negative consequences such as the loss of regionally or environmentally important crops.