natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
za ozaveščanje in prenos znanja med vodilnimi organi in javnostjo ter med zasebnimi finančnimi institucijami o strategijah financiranja in institucionalnih zahtevah za podporo naložbam v energetsko učinkovitost,
to raise awareness and know-how among managing authorities and public as well as private financial institutions on funding strategies and institutional requirements to support energy efficiency investments,
za podporo javnim in zasebnim finančnim ustanovam pri izvajanju ustreznih ukrepov in finančnih instrumentov,
to support public and private financial institutions in implementing corresponding measures and financial instruments,
za oblikovanje trajnostnih in učinkovitih finančnih instrumentov za boljšo izrabo razpoložljivih sredstev za naložbe v energetsko učinkovitost,
to structure sustainable and efficient financial instruments to better utilise available funds for energy efficiency investments,
za spodbujanje prenosa izkušenj glede najboljše prakse med državami članicami in njihovimi finančnimi posredniki,
to encourage the transfer of best-practices experience among Member States and their financial intermediaries,
za vzpostavitev učinkovitega komunikacijskega orodja in sprožitev dialoga, namenjenega državljanom, za razširjanje informacij o energetski učinkovitosti ciljnim skupinam ljudi in usmerjanje njihovega vedenja v zvezi s porabo energije;
to create an effective communication tool and to initiate a dialogue aimed at citizens in order to disseminate energy efficiency information to targeted categories of people and to guide their behaviour regarding energy consumption;
91. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči uporabnost inovativnih oblik regulacije, ki bi lahko učinkovito združevale zelo velik potencial za varčevanje z energijo v novih državah članicah s kapitalom in tehnološkim potencialom v razvitejših državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to examine the applicability of innovative forms of regulation which can effectively combine the substantial potential for energy saving in the new Member States with the capital and technological potential of the more developed Member States;
96. v tem okviru meni, da sta razvoj inovativnih tehnologij in njihovo dajanje na trg osnova za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti na vseh področjih uporabe, za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov in za povečanje deleža obnovljivih virov energije;
Considers, in this context, the development and placing on the market of innovative technologies to be the basis for improving energy efficiency in all fields of application, for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and for increasing the share of renewable energies;
100. pritrjuje pozivu skupine držav G-20 v izjavi z vrha v Torontu 27. junija 2010, naj se srednjeročno odpravijo subvencije za fosilna goriva, ter poudarja, da bi to sprostilo sredstva v višini več milijard eurov, ki bi se lahko usmerila v podpiranje ukrepov za energetsko učinkovitost in tako veliko bolje prispevala k strateškim energetskim ciljem EU o trajnostnosti, konkurenčnosti in zanesljivosti oskrbe;
Endorses the call by the G20 group of countries in its Toronto Summit Declaration of 27 June 2010 for fossil fuel subsidies to be phased out over the medium term, and points out that doing so would liberate billions of Euros which could be redirected to supporting energy efficiency measures, thus contributing far better to the EU's strategic energy objectives of sustainability, competitiveness and security of supply;
103. poudarja pomen okrepljene politike informiranja Komisije in držav članic v zvezi z energetsko učinkovitostjo in varčevanjem z energijo za vse zainteresirane strani ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj izboljšajo in dodatno olajšajo dostop do informacij o energetski učinkovitosti in varčevanju z energijo;
Stresses the importance of an intensified information policy of the Commission and the Member States regarding energy efficiency and energy savings issues towards all relevant stakeholders and calls upon the Commission and the Member States to improve and further facilitate such access to information on energy efficiency and energy savings issues;
Energetska učinkovitost je stroškovno najučinkovitejši in najhitrejši način za zmanjšanje emisij ogljikovega dioksida in drugih emisij.
Energy efficiency is the most cost-efficient and fastest way to reduce CO2- and other emissions.
Njene ogromne prednosti se kažejo tako v gospodarski rasti kot ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest.
The advantages are huge in terms of both economic growth and job creation.
Na ta način ustvarjena delovna mesta bodo na podeželskih in mestnih območjih, pogosto v malih in srednjih podjetjih, poleg tega bodo lokalna in se ne bodo selila.
The jobs created will be in both rural and urban areas, often within SMEs and it will be local jobs, which cannot be outsourced.
Viri teh delovnih mest so v informacijski tehnologiji, gradbeništvu in storitvah.
They will lie within IT, construction and services.
Od sprejetja akcijskega načrta za energetsko učinkovitost leta 2006 je bilo doseženega že veliko, vendar so se politične in gospodarske razmere od tedaj občutno spremenile.
A lot has been achieved since the adoption of the Energy Efficiency Action Plan in 2006; however, the political and economical context has changed quite a lot since then.
Zato je treba evropsko politiko za energetsko učinkovitost pregledati in jo uskladiti z aktualnimi prednostnimi nalogami in dogodki.
Therefore, there is a clear need to review the EU's Energy Efficiency policy to align it with the current priorities and developments.
Kot podlaga za pregled in prenovo evropske politike za energetsko učinkovitost bi morali izvesti poglobljeno oceno dosežkov in pomanjkljivosti akcijskega načrta iz leta 2006.
A thorough assessment of the achievements and shortcomings of the 2006 Energy Efficiency Action Plan should be undertaken as a basis for the revision of the EU's energy efficiency policy.
Prek številnih instrumentov na evropski in nacionalni ravni bi se lahko uvedli ukrepi za povečanje energetskega prihranka, na primer okoljsko označevanje in okoljski standard za proizvode, povezane z energijo, energetsko porabo stavb in drugo.
Measures towards boosting energy savings can be introduced through a great variety of instruments at EU-level and at national level such as labelling and eco-standards of energy-related products, the energy consumption of buildings, and many others.
Stališče poročevalca je, da bi si morali snovalci politike prizadevati za čim bolj raznolike načine, kako povečati energetsko učinkovitost EU-27, meni pa tudi, da so nekateri instrumenti primernejši za uporabo na nacionalni ravni.
It is the view of the rapporteur that policy-makers should seek to diversify the means by which they seek to make EU27 more energy efficient, and that some instruments are better suited to be used at the national level.
Cilji glede energetske učinkovitosti
Energy efficiency targets
Vse bolj in bolj jasno je, da EU ne bo uresničila svojega cilja glede 20-odstotnega zmanjšanja.
It seems to be more and more evident that the EU is not on track to meet its 20% target.
Glede tega manjka uradne dokumentacije Evropske komisije.
There is a lack of official documentation from the European Commission in this respect.
Čeprav ciljev glede emisij in obnovljivih virov ni težko meriti in jih je Eurostat javno objavil, so statistični podatki o energetski učinkovitosti sporni, model PRIMES pa pogosto označujejo za neprimernega.
While the targets for emissions and renewables are easy to measure and officially made available by Eurostat, statistics on energy efficiency, on the other hand, are controversial as the PRIMES-model is often contested.
Vseeno pa poročevalec meni, da je Komisija odgovorna za objavljanje statistik o razvoju vseh poglavitnejših elementov evropske energetske politike.
Nevertheless, the rapporteur believes that the Commission is responsible for presenting statistics on the development of all major elements of the EU's energy policy.
Splošno znano je, da imajo stavbe velik potencial glede energetske učinkovitosti.
It is well-known that there is a huge potential in energy efficiency in buildings.
Zaradi nedavne prenovitve direktive o energetski učinkovitosti stavb je na tej točki težko zahtevati, naj se še enkrat prenovi.
The recent recast of the EPBD makes it difficult to pursue another recast of this directive at this point.
Pomembnost stavb pa vendarle kliče po drugačnem pristopu – takšnem, ki bo v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti in ne bo v nasprotju s pravicami zasebne lastnine.
Nevertheless, the importance of buildings calls for a different approach, one which is in line with the principle of subsidiarity and does not infringe with the private property right.
Pretresti bi morali vprašanje ustreznih finančnih instrumentov, pa tudi potrebo po okrepitvi poklicnega usposabljanja, dostopa malih in srednjih podjetij do informacij ter ozaveščanja na splošno.
We should consider the issue of appropriate financing instruments as well as the need for strengthening professional training, access to information for SME and awareness-raising in general.
V žarišču bi morala biti obnova obstoječih stavb, saj se hitrost gradnje novih stavb v EU vztrajno niža, številne stare stavbe pa imajo največji potencial glede energetske učinkovitosti, če bodo pravilno obnovljene.
A focus should be on renovation of existing buildings, since the construction rate of new buildings gets lower and lower within the EU and many old buildings dispose of the highest efficiency potential, if renovated properly.
Poročevalec je na splošno mnenja, da bi bilo treba spodbujati prostovoljne sporazume, vendar so v nekaterih primerih potrebni minimalni standardi in oprijemljivi cilji, da bi premaknili trg v energetsko učinkovitejšo smer.
As a general principle the rapporteur is of the opinion that voluntary agreements should be promoted, however in some cases minimum standards and concrete targets are necessary measures to move the market in a more energy-efficient direction.
Direktiva o okoljsko primerni zasnovi je najučinkovitejši instrument na ravni EU na področju politike energetske učinkovitosti in zgleden primer, kakšne vrste politik bi morala EU uvajati.
The Eco-Design Directive is the most effective instrument at EU-level in energy efficiency policy, and it is a prime example of the types of policy the EU should seek to introduce.
Najobetavnejši pristop bi bil izhajati iz skupnih standardov za ves trg EU, uvesti več konkurence med državami članicami in jih s tem usposobiti za konkuriranje na svetovnem trgu.
The most promising approach seems to be founded on common standards for the EU-wide market, to introduce greater competition between Member States, enabling them to compete on the world market.
V panogi čiste tehnologije je treba premostiti razkorak med ZDA in Kitajsko na eni strani ter EU na drugi.
In the cleantech industry there is a need to bridge the gap between the USA and China, on one hand, and the EU, on the other.
Obe državi sta pri sprejemanju zakonodajnih ukrepov, ki spodbujajo energetsko učinkovite rešitve, dosti naprednejši kot EU.
Both countries are far more progressive than the EU with regard to adopting legislative measures promoting energy-efficient solutions.
Zato bi morale EU in države članice podpirati ukrepe in instrumente za povečanje financiranja.
Therefore, measures and instruments to boost financing should be supported by the EU and Member States.
S finančnim instrumentom na evropski ravni bi bilo treba spodbuditi uvedbo nacionalnih skladov za energetsko učinkovitost, ki bi podpirali pogodbe o energetski učinkovitosti (ang.
The introduction of national energy efficiency funds which support EPC’s should be incentivised through a financial instrument at the European level.
Tak model ustvarja nova delovna mesta v malih in srednjih podjetjih, potrošniki prihranijo pri računih za energijo, zmanjšajo pa se tudi emisije.
Such a model creates jobs within SME’s, consumers earn a saving on the energy bills and emissions are reduced.
o pregledu akcijskega načrta o energetski učinkovitosti
on revision of the Energy Efficiency Action Plan
6. poudarja, da so za gospodarske subjekte odločilni tudi dolgoročni cilji za zmanjšanje porabe energije za 42 % do leta 2030 ter za 75 % do leta 2050;
Points out that long-term targets are also of crucial importance to economic actors, and therefore proposes long-term targets for reducing energy consumption by 42% by 2030, and by 75% by 2050;
8. poudarja, da je ustrezno izvajanje direktive za okoljsko primerno zasnovo glavna prednostna naloga, ter ponavlja, da so v tej direktivi že predvideni izvedbeni ukrepi v zvezi z dvanajstimi skupinami izdelkov do leta 2007; vztraja, da morajo Komisija in države članice izboljšati nadzor trga, da bi zagotovile skladnost zlasti v primeru uvoženih izdelkov, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj izboljšajo komunikacijo o ukrepih; poudarja, da je treba na podlagi direktive določiti minimalne zahteve na ravni najnižjih stroškov življenjskega cikla, pri čemer je treba upoštevati najboljše izdelke, tj. tiste, ki so na trgu najbolj uspešni;
Underlines that proper implementation of the Ecodesign Directive is a key priority, and reiterates that the directive already provides for implementing measures with regard to 12 groups of products by 2007; insists that the Commission and the Member States must improve market surveillance in order to ensure compliance, especially in the case of imported products, and asks the Commission and the Member States to improve communication about the measures; emphasises the requirement under the directive to set minimum requirements at the level of lowest lifecycle costs, taking into account ‘top-runners’, i.e. best-performing products on the market;
10. ne glede na pravilno izvajanje direktive za okoljsko primerno zasnovo poudarja, da se lahko dodatne koristi na področju energetske učinkovitosti za nekatere panoge najlaže dosežejo z uporabo dopolnilnih sistemov; poziva Komisijo, naj podrobno preuči te možnosti in pripravi ustrezna zakonodajna orodja, ki bodo omogočila izvajanje drugačnega pristopa za obravnavanje energetske učinkovitosti na sistemski ravni namesto zgolj na ravni izdelka;
Notwithstanding the proper implementation of the Ecodesign directive, underlines that further gains in energy efficiency can best be achieved in the case of certain sectors by the use of integrative systems; calls on the Commission to study these possibilities in detail and to come forward with appropriate legislative tools that will allow for the implementation of a different approach, which addresses energy efficiency at system level rather than only at product level;
21. poziva Komisijo, naj razvije primerne vseevropske instrumente v podporo energetski učinkovitosti in jih uskladi z državami članicami, da bi ustvarila več spodbud in čim prej dosegla cilj zmanjšanja emisij CO 2 ;
Calls on the Commission to develop suitable Europe-wide instruments to support energy efficiency and to coordinate them with the Member States in order to create more incentives and achieve the goal of reducing CO2 as quickly as possible;
28. poudarja, da je za izpolnitev zgoraj omenjenih ciljev energetske učinkovitosti bistveno vlaganje v prometni sektor, zlasti v železniški in mestni prometni sistem, da bi kar se da zmanjšali uporabo tistih, ki porabijo več energije;
Stresses that in order to meet the energy-efficiency targets mentioned above, it is crucial to invest in the transport sector, especially railway and urban transport systems, in order to minimise the use of the more energy-demanding ones;
2. priznava, da je ena največjih ovir za uresničevanje energetske učinkovitosti na lokalni in regionalni ravni potreba po predhodnih naložbah; je prepričan, da bi moral vsak ukrep, sprejet na ravni EU, upoštevati vpliv na občine in regije ter njihove proračunske omejitve; zato predlaga Komisiji, naj se pri oblikovanju razvojnih smernic na področju energije posvetuje z regionalnimi predstavniki ter naj se lokalnim in regionalnim projektom zagotovi finančna podpora prek inovativnih programov, ki uporabljajo obstoječe vire energije in strukturne sklade;
Acknowledges that one of the greatest obstacles to realising energy efficiency at local and regional level is the need to invest upfront; is convinced that any measure taken at EU level should take due account of the implications for, and budgetary restrictions of, municipalities and regions; therefore recommends the Commission to consult local and regional representatives in order to set up development guidelines in the energy field and to provide financial support to local and regional projects through innovative programmes using existing energy resources and structural funds;
4. poudarja, da je eden načinov za uresničevanje možnosti varčevanja z energijo v EU, da države članice hitro in pravilno izvajajo zakonodajo EU glede energetske učinkovitosti stavb, energetskega označevanja in okoljsko primerne zasnove; poziva Komisijo, naj ta proces izvajanja dejavno podpre in spremlja;
Emphasises that one key to realising the EU’s energy-saving potential is the rapid and correct implementation by Member States of EU legislation on matters such as the energy performance of buildings, energy labelling and eco-design; calls on the Commission to actively support and monitor the implementation process;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj uvede ukrepe za boj proti energetski revščini, ki v Evropi prizadene najrevnejša gospodinjstva, ter dejavno podpira izvajanje in financiranje energetske učinkovitosti stanovanj;
Calls on the Commission to introduce measures to combat energy poverty, which in Europe affects the poorest households, and actively to support the implementation and financing of energy efficiency in housing;
11. poziva Komisijo, naj veljavno evropsko zakonodajo, na primer direktivo o okoljsko primerni zasnovi in direktivo o energetskem označevanju, združi, namesto da jo širi, da bi kar se da učinkovito izvajala zakonodajo EU in izkoristila sinergije, zlasti za potrošnika.
Calls on the Commission to combine existing European legislation such as the Eco-Design Directive and the Energy Labelling Directive instead of further expanding it, in order to optimise the implementation of EU legislation and make use of synergies, especially for the consumer.
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Sophie Auconie, Catherine Bearder, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Francesco De Angelis, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Elie Hoarau, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hjusmenova (Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova), Juozas Imbrasas, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Miroslav Mikolášik, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Monika Smolková, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Oldřich Vlasák, Hermann Winkler, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Sophie Auconie, Catherine Bearder, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Francesco De Angelis, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Elie Hoarau, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Juozas Imbrasas, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Miroslav Mikolášik, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Monika Smolková, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Oldřich Vlasák, Hermann Winkler
António Fernando Correia De Campos, Andrzej Grzyb, Yannick Jadot, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Ivari Padar, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Markus Pieper, Peter Skinner, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Catherine Trautmann, Hermann Winkler
António Fernando Correia De Campos, Andrzej Grzyb, Yannick Jadot, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Ivari Padar, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Markus Pieper, Peter Skinner, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Catherine Trautmann, Hermann Winkler
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o vzpostavitvi zmogljivosti za hitro odzivanje EU
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on setting up an EU rapid response capability
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU B7‑0228/2010................................................................13
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL B7‑0228/2010.................13
o vzpostavitvi zmogljivosti za hitro odzivanje EU
on setting up an EU rapid response capability
– ob upoštevanju člena 196 Lizbonske pogodbe, ki pravi, da bo Unija spodbujala sodelovanje med državami članicami za izboljšanje učinkovitosti sistemov za preprečevanje naravnih nesreč ali nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek, in zaščito pred njimi in, da si bo Unija prizadevala za spodbujanje skladnosti mednarodnega delovanja na področju civilne zaščite,
– having regard to Article 196 of the Lisbon Treaty which states that ‘the Union shall encourage cooperation between Member States in order to improve the effectiveness of systems for preventing and protecting against natural or man-made disasters’ and that ‘Union action shall aim to promote consistency in international civil-protection work’,
– ob upoštevanju člena 214 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki določa, da so dejavnosti Unije na področju humanitarne pomoči namenjene zagotavljanju „pomoči, podpore in zaščite ljudem v tretjih državah in žrtvam naravnih nesreč ali nesreč, ki jih je povzročil človek,“ in da „se izvajajo v skladu z načeli mednarodnega prava in z načeli nepristranskosti, nevtralnosti in nediskriminacije“,
– having regard to Article 214 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union which states that the Union’s operations in the field of humanitarian aid are intended to provide ‘assistance and relief and protection for people in third countries who are victims of natural or man-made disasters’ and that its operations shall be ‘conducted in compliance with the principles of international law and with the principles of impartiality, neutrality and non-discrimination’,
– ob upoštevanju Evropskega soglasja o humanitarni pomoči, ki so ga decembra 2007 skupaj podpisali predsedniki Sveta Evropske unije, Evropskega parlamenta in Evropske komisije in akcijskega načrta za njegovo uresničitev, ki ga je Komisija predložila maja 2008,
– having regard to the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid jointly signed in December 2007 by the Presidents of the Council of the European Union, the European Parliament and the European Commission, and the Action Plan presented by the Commission in May 2008 for the implementation of the consensus,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z decembra 2007, ki Komisijo pozivajo k najboljši uporabi mehanizma civilne zaščite Skupnosti in k nadaljnji krepitvi sodelovanja med državami članicami,
– having regard to the Council conclusions of December 2007 inviting the Commission to make the best use of the Community Civil Protection mechanism and to further strengthen cooperation between Member States,
– ob upoštevanju smernic o uporabi vojaških sredstev in virov za civilno zaščito v okviru pomoči v primeru nesreč (smernice iz Osla), ki so bile revidirane 27. novembra 2006,
– having regard to the guidelines on the use of military and civil defence assets in the event of disaster (Oslo Guidelines), as revised on 27 November 2006,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 23. februarja 2009 „Strategija EU v podporo zmanjševanju tveganja nesreč v državah v razvoju”,
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament of 23 February 2009 on an ‘EU strategy for supporting disaster risk reduction in developing countries’,