natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na volitvah v Evropski parlament junija 2004 je poslanec Beniamino Donnici kandidiral na listi „Società civile DI PIETRO-OCCHETTO“, ki je prejela dva sedeža v dveh volilnih okrožjih.
At the June 2004 elections to the European Parliament, Mr Beniamino Donnici was a candidate on the Società civile DI PIETRO-OCCHETTO list, which had won two seats in two constituencies.
V obeh je bil izvoljen poslanec Antonio Di Pietro, ki se je odločil za okrožje na jugu Italije.
Mr Antonio Di Pietro was elected in both and he opted for the Italy South constituency.
Poslanec Achille Occhetto, ki je bil v obeh okrožjih prvi neizvoljeni, je predložil izjavo, v kateri se je odpovedal izvolitvi na mesto evropskega poslanca.
Mr Achille Occhetto (who was first on the list of the candidates who had not been elected in either constituency) declared that he would withdraw as a candidate for election to the European Parliament.
Zato je bil v prvem okrožju izvoljen poslanec Giulietto Chiesa, ki je bil na listi takoj za poslancem Achillejem Occhettom, poslanec Beniamino Donnici, ki je bil tretji izvoljen na seznamu v drugem okrožju, pa se je pomaknil na prvo mesto med neizvoljenimi.
Hence those elected in the first constituency were Mr Giulietto Chiesa (who came immediately after Mr Achille Occhetto on the list) and Mr Beniamino Donnici (who was third on the list in the other constituency and was promoted to the top of the list of those who had not been elected).
Po političnih volitvah v Italiji se je poslanec Antonio Di Pietro odpovedal evropskemu mandatu, saj je bil izvoljen za poslanca v italijanski parlament.
Following the parliamentary elections held in Italy, Mr Antonio Di Pietro stood down as an MEP, since he had been elected as a Member of the Italian Parliament.
Poslanec Achille Occhetto je zaprosil, da bi lahko kot prvi od neizvoljenih v okrožju na jugu Italije nasledil poslancu Antoniu Di Pietru, in preklical prejšnjo odpoved.
Mr Achille Occhetto asked to be allowed to replace Mr Antonio Di Pietro as the first of those who had not been elected in the Italy South constituency and he revoked his earlier decision to withdraw.
Nacionalni volilni urad za Evropski parlament na pritožbenem sodišču je nato razglasil izvolitev Achilleja Occhetta za poslanca Evropskega parlamenta v okrožju na jugu Italije in za listo „Società civile DI PIETRO-OCCHETTO“ kot prvega od treh neizvoljenih v tem okrožju.
Thus the National Electoral Office for the European Parliament at the Court of Appeal declared Mr Achille Occhetto elected as a Member of the European Parliament (in the Italy South constituency and for the Società civile DI PIETRO-OCCHETTO list) in his capacity as the first of those who had not secured election in that constituency.
Obrazložitev za ta ukrep, s katerim ni bil upoštevan odstop, ki ga je pred tem podal sam poslanec Achille Occhetto, je temeljila na presoji, da odpoved kandidaturi za evropskega poslanca, ki jo je predložil poslanec Achille Occhetto 7 julija 2004, z razliko od okoliščin v prvem okrožju (severozahod Italije) ni imela učinka, zato šteje za preklicno, saj je do nje prišlo še pred začetkom postopka nadomestitve poslanca Antonia Di Pietra s kandidatom, ki mu na isti listi in v četrtem okrožju (jug Italije) neposredno sledi.
The grounds for this decision (which took no account of Mr Achille Occhetto's statement of withdrawal) were that, 'unlike what occurred in the case of the first constituency (Italy North-West), Mr Achille Occhetto's 7 July 2004 decision to withdraw as a candidate for election to the European Parliament has had no effect and must therefore be regarded as revocable, since it was taken before the start of the procedure to replace Mr Antonio Di Pietro with the candidate who comes immediately after him on the same list and in the fourth constituency (Italy South).'
Poslanec Beniamino Donnici s pritožbo, vloženo na regionalnem upravnem sodišču za deželo Lacij 30. maja 2006 (R.G. št. 5258/2006), izpodbija ukrep nacionalnega volilnega urada kot nezakonit zaradi kršenja členov 20, 21, 22 in 41 zakona št. 18 s 24. januarja 1979 in splošnih načel glede volitev, ter zato, ker je bil za izvoljenega razglašen poslanec Achille Occhetto, ki se je že 7. julija 2004 odpovedal izvolitvi in ki zato ni bil na listi izvoljenih kandidatov in morebitnih namestnikov, poslani Evropskemu parlamentu12. novembra 2004.
By means of an appeal submitted on 30 May 2006 to the Lazio Regional Administrative Tribunal (RG No 5258/2006), Mr Beniamino Donnici challenged the action taken by the National Electoral Office on the grounds that it was illegitimate, since it infringed Articles 20, 21, 22 and 41 of Law No 18 of 24 January 1979 and also the general principles relating to elections, and since Mr Achille Occhetto had been declared elected, even though he had withdrawn on 7 July 2004, which meant that he did not appear on the list of the elected candidates and the possible substitutes which had been forwarded to the European Parliament on 12 November 2004.
Še pred odločitvijo upravnega sodišča je Evropski parlament na podlagi razglasitve nacionalnega volilnega urada in pregleda, ki ga je izvedel Odbor za pravne zadeve na svoji seji 21. junija 2006, ustrezno potrdil poslanski mandat poslanca Achilleja Occhetta (plenarno zasedanje z dne 3. julija 2006).
Having allowed appropriate time for an administrative decision to be taken, the European Parliament - acting on the basis of the declaration made by the National Electoral Office and of the examination of the matter carried out by the Committee on Legal Affairs at its meeting of 21 June 2006 - duly validated Mr Achille Occhetto's parliamentary mandate (plenary sitting of 3 July 2006).
Odbor za pravne zadeve, ki se je seznanil s pritožbo poslanca Beniamina Donnicija, je ugotovil, da je pritožba povezana z morebitnimi kršitvami nacionalnega postopka imenovanja izvoljenih ter da zato ni sprejemljiva, saj v skladu z Aktom z dne 20. septembra 1976 o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami Evropski parlament odloča v sporih, ki lahko izhajajo iz določb zgoraj omenjenega akta, razen v tistih, ki izhajajo iz nacionalnih predpisov, na katere se akt sklicuje.
In particular, the Committee on Legal Affairs - having been informed of Mr Beniamino Donnici's proposed appeal - established that the dispute related to possible infringements of Italy's procedure for the nomination of elected representatives and that it was not therefore admissible since - pursuant to Article 12 of the 20 September 1976 Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage - the European Parliament 'shall rule on any disputes which may arise out of the provisions of this Act other than those arising out of the national provisions to which the Act refers'.
Regionalno upravno sodišče je s sodbo št. 6232 z dne 21. julija 2006 zavrnilo pritožbo poslanca Beniamina Donnicija, saj je presodilo, da odpoved, izražena pred razglasitvijo izvoljenih predstavnikov, ne predstavlja odpovedi položaju na seznamu, saj spoštovanje ljudske volje narekuje, da so volilni rezultati nerazpoložljivi in nespremenljivi; odpoved nima učinka, če so sprejeti morebitni akti o prenosu pravice v primeru neskladnosti, izgube pravice, neizvoljivosti, ali če se imenovanju ali funkciji odpovedo osebe, ki so do nje upravičene.
By means of Ruling No 6232 of 21 July 2006 the Regional Administrative Tribunal rejected Mr Beniamino Donnici's appeal on the grounds that a withdrawal expressed with a view to the proclamation of elected representatives did not constitute a withdrawal from a position on a list, since respect for the will of the people requires that electoral results be regarded as unalterable and has no effect when any acts of substitution are being adopted in the event of incompatibility, loss of civil rights, ineligibility or resignation from an appointment or position on the part of those officially entitled to them.
Zato je kandidat, ki se je odpovedal izvolitvi, v primeru, da se pojavijo okoliščine za prenos pravice, upravičen, da umakne odpovedno izjavo ter zasede sedež, ki ga je treba zapolniti s prenosom pravice.
Hence a candidate who has withdrawn from an election is entitled - when the prerequisites for substitution are being verified - to withdraw his act of withdrawal in order to take over a seat to be recovered by means of substitution.
Peti oddelek državnega sveta je s sklepom št. 7185 z dne 6. decembra 2006 ugodil pritožbi poslanca Beniamina Donnicija zoper sodbo regionalnega upravnega sodišča iz Lacija, ter jo popravil na podlagi sledečih dokazov:
By means of Decision No 7185 of 6 December 2006 the Council of State accepted the appeal lodged by Mr Beniamino Donnici against the ruling issued by the Lazio Regional Administrative Tribunal and it amended that ruling on the basis of the following arguments:
· razlikovanje med odpovedjo izvolitvi in odpovedjo položaju na seznamu ni smiselno, saj je izvolitev posledica položaja na seznamu, zato odpoved izvolitvi za zadevno osebo pomeni tudi odpravo seznama in vseh posledic, ki iz njega izhajajo;
· the distinction between withdrawing from an election and withdrawing from a position on a list is illogical, since election is an effect of a position on a list, hence withdrawal from an election entails removal of the individual concerned from the list and whatever effects may follow;
· trditev, da odpoved izvolitvi ne vpliva na prenos pravice in da ima kandidat, ki se je odpovedal, pravico umakniti odpoved, ko je potrebno opraviti prenos pravice, je protislovna;
· it is contradictory to assert that withdrawal from an election has no bearing on substitution and that the withdrawing candidate is entitled to withdraw the withdrawal in cases where substitution is called for;
· odpoved izvolitvi je nepreklicna izjava (ko jo pristojni organ ali urad, kateremu je namenjena, zabeleži), ki povzroči spremembo seznama, s katerim razpolaga volilni urad.
· withdrawal from an election constitutes an irrevocable declaration (once the competent body or office to which the announcement of withdrawal is sent has taken note thereof) which has the effect of amending the list made available to the electoral office.
Iz tega sledi, da je državni svet razveljavil razglasitev poslanca Achilleja Occhetta za poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
The Council of State has thus annulled the proclamation of Mr Achille Occhetto as a Member of the European Parliament.
Problematični pravni vidiki
Problematic legal aspects
a) Pravo, ki se uporablja
(a) The rules applicable
Izhodišče pri analizi najbolj problematičnih pravnih vidikov nam ponudi določitev prava, ki se uporablja v redu Skupnosti, in prav tu se oba primera odpovedi položaju na seznamu in odpovedi lastnemu mandatu približata.
The starting point for an analysis of the most problematic legal aspects is the identification of the applicable Community rules and it is here that the two cases involving withdrawal from a position in a list and withdrawal from a parliamentary mandate tend to converge.
Peti odstavek tretjega člena parlamentarnega poslovnika določa, da „ kadar je imenovanje poslanca posledica odstopa kandidatov na isti listi, odbor, pristojen za preverjanje veljavnosti mandatov, zagotovi, da so navedeni odstopi potekali v skladu s črko in duhom Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 in člena 4(3)“ .
Pursuant to Rule 3(5) of the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure, 'Where the appointment of a Member is due to the withdrawal of candidates from the same list, the committee responsible for the verification of credentials shall ensure that such withdrawals have taken place in accordance with the spirit and the letter of the Act of 20 September 1976 and Rule 4(3)'.
Pravilno lahko domnevamo, da je primer poslanca Achilleja Occhetta smiselno urejati z istimi predpisi, ki se uporabljajo za odstop.
It may legitimately be held that the case of Mr Achille Occhetto can be dealt with by analogy on the basis of the same rules as those governing resignations.
Glede na dobesedni pomen predpisa, da „odstop kandidatov na isti listi“ vključuje odstop od trenutnega mandata in odstop od prihodnjega mandata, lahko sklepamo, da slednjega, ki vključuje prav primer poslanca Achilleja Occhetta, lahko smiselno urejajo ista pravila, ki urejajo odstop od parlamentarnega mandata, ki ga izvoljeni že ima.
Having regard to the literal meaning of the rule that 'the withdrawal of candidates from the same list' includes both resignations from a current mandate and withdrawal from a future mandate, the view must be taken that the latter (which includes the case of Mr Achille Occhetto), may be dealt with by analogy on the basis of the same rules as those governing resignations from the parliamentary office which the elected individual already holds.
To pomeni, da mora Evropski parlament preveriti, ali odpoved poslanca Achilleja Occhetta dejansko spoštuje črko in duh Akta iz leta 1976 in ali so bile spoštovane formalne zahteve tretjega odstavka člena 4(3) Poslovnika.
This means first of all that the European Parliament is required to check whether or not Mr Achille Occhetto's withdrawal is in accordance with the spirit and the letter of the 1976 Act and, secondly, whether or not the formal requirements laid down in Rule 4(3) of the Rules of Procedure have been observed.
b) Neskladnost odstopa z Aktom iz leta 1976
(b) Incompatibility of the withdrawal with the 1976 Act
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da se na poslanca ni vplivalo s kakršnimi koli pritiski ali pogojevanji, začenši z obstojem dogovorov ali pogodb, povezanih z izražanjem njegove volje.
It must therefore be established that the Member's will has not been subject to pressures or influences of any kind, beginning with the existence of pacts or agreements relating to the expression of his will.
Prav to se je zgodilo s poslancem Achillejem Occhetto.
This is precisely the case with Mr Achille Occhetto.
Njegova izjava o odpovedi je rezultat pogojevanja njegovega odločanja s predhodnim dogovorom z drugim članom liste “Società civile DI PIETRO-OCCHETTO”, zato ni v skladu s črko in duhom Akta iz leta 1976 in je torej nična.
His withdrawal statement is the outcome of a will influenced by an earlier agreement with the other component of the Società civile DI PIETRO-OCCHETTO list and must therefore be deemed incompatible with the spirit and the letter of the 1976 Act and hence null and void.
Tudi prvi odstavek drugega člena Statuta poslancev ( ki bo sicer začel veljati leta 2009) določa, da so „ Poslanci (…) svobodni in neodvisni “.
Furthermore, Article 2(1) of the Members' Statute ( due to come into force in 2009 ) states that 'Members shall be free and independent' .
Drugi odstavek pa, ki se očitno naslanja na odstavek 1, določa, da so „ dogovori o odstopu pred iztekom mandata ali ob koncu mandatne dobe (…) nični“.
Paragraph 2 (which is clearly based on paragraph 1) states that 'agreements concerning the resignation from office of a Member before or at the end of a parliamentary term shall be null and void' .
Ta določba le pojasnjuje načela svobode in neodvisnosti, ki jih je vseboval že Akt iz leta 1976 in ki jih Statut poslancev jasno potrdi za zaščito Evropskega parlamenta in njegovih poslancev.
This provision is only a spelling out of the principles of freedom and independence which are already laid down in the 1976 Act and which the Members' Statute explicitly endorses in the interests of the European Parliament and its Members.
c) Ničnost odpovedi zaradi napak v postopku
c) The invalidity of the withdrawal on account of a procedural flaw
Razlog za to določbo je popolnoma isti kot v šestem členu, se pravi zaščita poslanca pred kakršnim koli pogojevanjem: napako, odvračanjem, grožnjami itd.
The reason for this provision is exactly the same as the one for Article 6 of the Act, i.e. to protect the Member's will from any form of influence: error, diversion, threat etc.
V primeru poslanca Achilleja Occhetta, pri katerem se, kot povedano, smiselno uporabljajo predpisi, veljavni za odstop, zadevne formalne zahteve niso bile spoštovane, saj ni bil sestavljen uradni zapisnik v navzočnosti generalnega sekretarja ali njegovega predstavnika; posledično se sklepa, da je odstop poslanca Achilleja Occhetta tudi s formalnega vidika ničen.
Since in the case of Mr Achille Occhetto (to which - as has been seen - the rules relating to resignations apply by analogy) the formal requirements in question were not observed (no report was drawn up in the presence of the Secretary-General or his representative), it must be concluded that Mr Achille Occhetto's withdrawal is null and void from a formal viewpoint as well.
d) Mnenje pravne službe
d) The Legal Service's opinion
Pravna služba, ki jo je odbor zaprosil za mnenje o vprašanju, je izdala negativno mnenje v smislu, da je treba upoštevati sodbo države članice.
The Legal Service was asked by the committee to issue an opinion on the matter, in which it stated that a ruling issued in a Member State should be taken into account.
Zato ima Odbor za pravne zadeve dolžnost, da preveri skladnost postavljenega vprašanja s črko in duhom Evropskega akta.
Hence the Committee on Legal Affairs is required to examine the matter in the light of the spirit and the letter of the rules laid down in the European Act.
Odstop poslanca Achilleja Occhetta je ničen, saj je bil kot tak potreben, da bi postal mandat njegovega naslednika veljaven, zato bo moral Evropski parlament pri preverjanju mandata poslanca Beniamina Donnicija izdati negativno mnenje.
Mr Achille Occhetto's withdrawal is null and void, since it is essential to the validity of his successor's mandate, and the European Parliament will have to issue a negative opinion when verifying Mr Beniamino Donnici's credentials.
Ker v zvezi s tem vprašanjem že obstaja nacionalna sodba, bo na koncu doseženi rezultat ta, da veljavnost mandata poslanca Beniamina Donnicija ne bo potrjena, hkrati pa domnevno ne bo mogoče potrditi mandata poslanca Achilleja Occhetta.
Since the Italian authorities have issued a ruling on the matter, the outcome will be that Mr Beniamino Donnici will be denied a valid mandate, yet at the same time it will not be possible for the validity of Mr Achille Occhetto's mandate to be confirmed.
Težava pri tem pa ni neizvajanje odločb državnega sveta, ampak vezanost Evropskega parlamenta na nacionalno sodbo, ki je bila oblikovana v nasprotju z načeli Akta iz leta 1976, v skladu s katerimi si Evropski parlament na nek način pridrži pristojnost (prim. člen 12 v prvem delu Akta, ki pravi, da Evropski parlament preveri mandate poslancev Evropskega parlamenta).
However, the issue is not that the decisions taken by the Council of State no longer apply but, rather, whether or not the European Parliament is bound by a ruling issued by a Member State which goes against the principles laid down in the 1976 Act - principles in respect of which Parliament's may be said to have a reserved jurisdiction (see the first part of Article 12 of the Act: 'The European Parliament shall scrutinise the mandates of its Members ).
o socialnem statusu umetnikov
on the social status of artists
– ob upoštevanju konvencije Unesca o zaščiti in spodbujanju raznolikosti kultur,
– having regard to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o okvirni strategiji za nediskriminacijo in enake možnosti za vse ( KOM(2005)0224 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission entitled ‘Non-discrimination and equal opportunities for all - a framework strategy’ ( COM(2005)0224 ),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije o posodabljanju delovnega prava za soočanje z izzivi 21. stoletja ( KOM(2006)0708 ),
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper entitled ‘Modernising labour law to meet the challenges of the 21st century’ ( COM(2006)0708 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. oktobra 2002 o pomembnosti dinamike v gledališču in uprizoritvene umetnosti v razširjeni Evropi
– having regard to its resolution of 22 October 2002 on the importance and the dynamism of the theatre and the performing arts in an enlarged Europe
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2003 o kulturni industriji
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2003 on the cultural industries
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. oktobra 2005 o novih izzivih za cirkus kot del evropske kulture
– having regard to its resolution of 13 October 2005 on new challenges for the circus as part of European culture
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 z dne 14. junija 1971 o izvajanju sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo znotraj Skupnosti
– having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 883/2004 z dne 29. aprila 2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems
UL L 166, 30.4.2004, str.
OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 92/100/EGS z dne 19. novembra 1992 o pravici dajanja v najem in pravici posojanja ter o določenih pravicah, sorodnih avtorski, na področju intelektualne lastnine
– having regard to Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights relating to copyright in the field of intellectual property
UL L 346, 27.11.1992, str.
OJ L 346, 27.11.1992, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 93/98/EGS z dne 29. oktobra 1993 o uskladitvi trajanja varstva avtorske pravice in določenih sorodnih pravic
– having regard to Council Directive 93/98/EEC of 29 October 1993 harmonising the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights
UL L 290, 24.11.1993, str.
OJ L 290, 24.11.1993, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/29/ES z dne 22. maja 2001 o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi
– having regard to Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society
UL L 167, 22.6.2001, str.
OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. marca 1999 o položaju in vlogi umetnikov v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 9 March 1999 on the situation and role of artists in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 30. marca 2000 v zadevi C-178/97 Barry Banks in drugi proti Théâtre Royal de la Monnaie
– having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of 30 March 2000 in Case C-178/97, Barry Banks and others v Théâtre Royal de la Monnaie
– ob upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 15. junija 2006 v zadevi C-255/04 Komisija Evropskih skupnosti proti Francoski republiki
– having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of 15 June 2006 in Case C-255/04, Commission of the European Communities v French Republic
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0199/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0199/2007 ),
A. ker je tudi umetnost lahko delo in poklic,
A. whereas art may also be considered as an occupation and a profession,
B. ker se zgoraj navedene sodbe in Direktiva 96/71/ES nanašajo zlasti na dejavnosti s področja uprizoritvenih umetnosti,
B. whereas the above-mentioned judgments and Directive 96/71/EC all specifically apply to activities of performing artists,
C. ker se je za opravljanje umetniške dejavnosti na višji ravni treba za svet uprizoritvene umetnosti in kulture zanimati od malih nog in imeti ključ za dostop do velikih del naše kulturne dediščine,
C. whereas to engage in top-level artistic activity it is necessary from a very early age to develop an interest in the performing arts and culture and hold the keys giving access to the major works forming part of our cultural heritage,