natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Uporaba prava, določenega v Protokolu, se lahko zavrne le, če bi bile posledice uporabe tega prava očitno nezdružljive z javnim redom države pristojnega sodišča (člen 13).
Application of the law determined under the Protocol may be refused only to the extent that its effects would be manifestly contrary to the public policy of the forum State (Article 13).
Pri določitvi zneska preživnine je treba upoštevati potrebe upravičenca in vire zavezanca, tudi če pravo, ki se uporablja, določa drugače (člen 14).
In determining the amount of maintenance, the needs of the creditor and the resources of the debtor must be taken into account, even if the applicable law provides otherwise (Article 14).
Člen 24 protokola omogoča Evropski skupnosti, da k njemu pristopi kot regionalna organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje.
Article 24 of the Protocol enables the European Community as a Regional Economic Integration Organisation to become a party.
Poseben pomen tega protokola je, da člen 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 4/2009 z dne 18. decembra 2008 o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb ter sodelovanju v preživninskih zadevah omogoča, da se pravo, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti, določi v skladu s Haaškim protokolom z dne 23. novembra 2007 v državah članicah, ki jih ta akt zavezuje.
The particular relevance of the Protocol is that Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations provides that the law applicable to maintenance obligations shall be determined in accordance with the Hague Protocol of 23 November 2007 in the Member States bound by that instrument.
V skladu z uvodno izjavo 20 v preambuli k omenjeni uredbi se za države članice, ki jih zavezuje Haaški protokol iz leta 2007, glede preživninskih obveznosti uporabljajo določbe o kolizijskih pravilih, ki so predvidene v navedenem protokolu.
According to recital 20 of the preamble to the Regulation, for Member States bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol, the rules on conflict of laws in respect of maintenance obligations will be those set out in that Protocol.
V ta namen bi bilo treba v uredbo vključiti določbo, ki se sklicuje na navedeni protokol.
To that end, a provision referring to the said Protocol should be inserted.
Skupnost mora Haaški protokol iz leta 2007 skleniti pravočasno, da se bo uredba lahko uporabljala.
The 2007 Hague Protocol will be concluded by the Community in time to enable this Regulation to apply.
Združeno kraljestvo se ne bo pridružilo sklepu Sveta o sklenitvi protokola s strani Skupnosti.
The United Kingdom will not opt in to the Council Decision on the conclusion by the Community of the Protocol.
Uredba Sveta št. 4/2009 začne veljati bodisi 18. junija 2011 bodisi na dan začetka uporabe haaškega protokola z dne 23. novembra 2007 o pravu, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti.
Council Regulation No 4/2009 becomes applicable either on 18 June 2011 or from the date of application of the Hague Protocol of 23 November 2007 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations ‏.
Ker je zelo očitno, da mora Skupnost protokol skleniti, in ob upoštevanju sprememb, ki jih je v predlog Komisije vnesla delovna skupina Sveta, poročevalec Parlamentu zelo priporoča, da predlog sprejme, obenem pa obžaluje odločitev Združenega kraljestva, da se sklepu ne bo pridružilo.
In view of the manifest need for the Community to conclude the Protocol and having regard to the changes made by the Council working group to the Commission's proposal, the rapporteur wholeheartedly commends this proposal to Parliament while regretting the United Kingdom's decision not to opt in.
o skupnem besedilu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statistiki o pesticidih, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning statistics on pesticides
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE–CONS 3676/2009 – C7–0258/2009 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3676/2009 – C7‑0258/2009 ),
UL C 66 E, 20.3.2009, str.
OJ C 66 E, 20.3.2009, p.
98. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0778 ),
98. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0778 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 24.4.2009, P6_TA(2009)0318 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 24.4.2009, P6_TA(2009)0318 . on the Council common position
UL C 38 E, 17.2.2009, str.
OJ C 38 E, 17.2.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2009)0486 ),
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2009)0486 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 69 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 69 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A7–0063/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A7‑0063/2009 ),
Namen predlagane uredbe je vzpostaviti pravni okvir in določiti usklajena pravila za zbiranje in razširjanje statističnih podatkov o prodaji in uporabi pesticidov.
The aim of the proposed Regulation is to create a legal framework and define harmonised rules for the collection and dissemination of statistics on the sale and use of pesticides.
Zlasti se opredeljujejo pravila za pogostost zbiranja podatkov, metode zbiranja podatkov ter obliko in pogostost obveznega poročanja.
In particular, it defines rules for data collection frequency, data collection methods and the format and periodicity of reporting obligations.
Predlagana uredba je del zakonodajnega svežnja, ki vsebuje tudi predlog direktive za oblikovanje okvira dejavnosti Skupnosti pri doseganju trajnostne rabe pesticidov ter predlog uredbe za dajanje fitofarmacevtskih sredstev na trg.
The proposed Regulation is part of a legislative package that includes the proposal for a Directive establishing a framework for Community action to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides and the proposal for a Regulation concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market.
So-zakonodajalci so januarja 2009 dosegli dogovor o obeh predlogih.
On both these proposals agreement between the co-legislators was reached in January 2009.
Soodločanje in spravni postopek
Codecision and Conciliation
Parlament in Svet sta z neuradnimi pogajanji pred drugo obravnavo v Parlamentu dosegla uravnotežen sporazum, ki ga je podprla prepričljiva večina političnih skupin.
Informal negotiations between the Parliament and the Council before the second reading in the Parliament lead to the reaching of a well balanced agreement that was supported by the overwhelming majority of the political groups.
Sestavljen je iz štiridesetih predlogov sprememb, ki se zlasti nanašajo na:
This agreement consisted of a set of 40 amendments, which mainly focused on:
§ zamenjavo termina „fitofarmacevtska sredstva“ s terminom „pesticidi“ v celotni uredbi in opredelitev v direktivi o trajnostni uporabi, da bi se zagotovila jasnost in doslednost v celotnem zakonodajnem svežnju,
§ Replacement throughout the Regulation of the term 'plant protection products' with the term 'pesticides', which is also the definition included in the Directive on sustainable use, in order to ensure clarity and consistency of the whole legislative package.
§ vključitev pojma „biocidni pripravki“ skupaj z možnostjo, da se področje uporabe uredbe v prihodnje razširi na statistiko pesticidov zato, da se zajame tudi uporaba zadevnih „biocidov“ v skladu z rezultati študije vpliva,
§ Inclusion of the concept of 'biocidal products', with the possibility in the future to extend the scope of the Regulation on Pesticide Statistics in order to cover the use of relevant 'biocides', in accordance with the results of an impact study.
§ boljše informiranje in večjo preglednost pri pesticidih z objavo ustreznih podatkov na spletu,
§ Better information and greater transparency concerning pesticides by publishing the relevant data on the Internet.
§ vključitev jasnega sklica na splošni zakonodajni okvir o statistiki v zvezi s tem, kako je treba statistiko uporabljati (tudi zahteva o zaupnosti),
§ Inclusion of a clear reference to the general legislative framework on statistics concerning the way statistics should be used (including the requirement of confidentiality)
§ komitologijo: uvajanje regulativnega postopka s pregledom pri zahtevah za poročila o kakovosti zbiranja podatkov v državah članicah.
§ Comitology: introduction of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny concerning the requirements of the quality reports on data collection by the Member States
Poročevalec in predsedujoči političnih skupin PPE, S&D, ALDE, Verts in GUE so v pismu 8. julija ponovno podprli začasni sporazum, dosežen v drugi obravnavi, in pozvali Svet, naj najde način, kako bi se ta sporazum ponovno potrdil.
By letter of 8 July 2009 the rapporteur and the chairs of the political groups EPP, S&D, ALDE, the Greens and GUE reiterated their support for the provisional agreement reached in second reading and invited the Council to reflect on ways on how to reconfirm this agreement.
Po nekaj neuradnih srečanjih se je Svet strinjal, da zavrne edino spremembo, ki je bila sprejeta, in sproži spravni postopek, da bi se ponudila nova možnost za sprejetje celotnega svežnja sprememb.
After a round of informal contacts the Council finally agreed to reject the single amendment adopted and consequently to go to conciliation with a view to providing a second chance for the adoption of the set of amendments agreed.
Parlament je 9. oktobra 2009 sestavil svojo delegacijo za spravni odbor s pisnim postopkom (pismo predsednice delegacije Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou).
Parliament constituted its delegation to the Conciliation Committee by written procedure on 9 October 2009 (letter by the chair of the Delegation Mrs Kratsa).
Predsednica Kratsa je v pismu Svetu ponovno izrazila podporo parlamentarne delegacije začasnemu sporazumu, doseženem v drugi obravnavi.
In a letter to the Council Mrs Kratsa reiterated the support of the Parliament Delegation for the provisional agreement reached in second reading.
Na srečanju Coreper 14. oktobra je Svet potrdil svojo podporo osnutku skupnega besedila, sestavljenega iz skupnega stališča, spremenjenega v skladu s svežnjem sprememb, dogovorjenim na neuradnih srečanjih ob drugi obravnavi.
At the Coreper meeting on 14 October the Council confirmed its support for the draft joint text consisting of the common position modified in line with the set of amendments agreed at the informal negotiations in second reading.
Delegacija parlamenta je enoglasno s pisnim postopkom potrdila osnutek skupnega besedila (glasovalo je 24 članov, vsi za, brez vzdržanih).
The Parliament Delegation confirmed the draft joint text by unanimity by written procedure (24 Members voted, all of them in favour, no abstentions).
Na tej podlagi je spravni odbor pod točko A uradno sprejel osnutek skupnega besedila na sestanku 4. novembra, na katerem je bila glavna točka spravni postopek za telekomunikacije.
On this basis the Conciliation Committee formally adopted the draft joint text as an 'A' point at its meeting on 4 November, at which the principal item on the agenda was the 'Telecoms' conciliation.
Ker cilj spravnega postopka ni bil ponoviti pogajanja o vsebini, ampak zgolj zagotoviti dodatno možnost za sprejetje dobro uravnoteženega sporazuma, doseženega v drugi obravnavi, se lahko njegov izid šteje za zelo uspešnega za Evropski parlament.
Given that the aim of conciliation was not to restart negotiations on the substance but simply to provide a second chance for the adoption of the well balanced agreement reached in second reading the outcome of conciliation can be considered as highly successful for the European Parliament.
Delegacija Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru zato priporoča sprejetje skupnega besedila v tretji obravnavi.
Therefore, the Parliament Delegation to the Conciliation Committee recommends that the joint text be approved in third reading.
Statistika o pesticidih
Statistics on pesticides
Predsednik/-ca delegacije: podpredsednik/-ca
Delegation Chair: Vice-President
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statistiki o pesticidih – KOM(2006)0778 – C6–0457/2006
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning statistics pesticides – COM(2006)0778 – C6-0457/2006
Datum 1. obravnave EP – številka P
Parliament’s first reading – P number
Datum 2. obravnave EP – številka P
Date of second reading – P number
Datum prejema stališča iz 2. obravnave Sveta
Date Council received second reading
Navzoči namestniki (člen 187(2))
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the vote
Datum ugotovitve sopredsedujočih o odobritvi skupnega besedila in posredovanje skupnega besedila EP in Svetu
Date on which the co-Chairs established that the joint text had been approved and forwarded it to Parliament and the Council
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sprejetju izvedbenih pravil, ki urejajo odnose Europola s partnerji, vključno z izmenjavo osebnih podatkov in tajnih informacij
on the draft Council decision adopting the implementing rules governing Europol's relations with partners, including the exchange of personal data and classified information
– ob upoštevanju besedila Sveta (11944/2009),
– having regard to the text of the Council (11944/2009),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2009/371/PNZ z dne 6. aprila 2009 o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (Europol)
– having regard to the Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol)
UL L 121, 15.5.2009, str.
OJ L 121, 15.5.2009, p.
37. („Sklep o Europolu“), in zlasti členov 26(1)(b) in 59(1)(c) tega sklepa,
37. (the 'Europol Decision'), and in particular Article 26(1)(b) and Article 59(1)(c) thereof,
– ob upoštevanju členov 39(1) in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7–0106/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0106/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7-0064/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7‑0064/2009 ),
Izvedbena pravila, ki urejajo odnose Europola s partnerji, vključno z izmenjavo osebnih podatkov in tajnih informacij
Implementing rules governing Europol’s relations with partners, including the exchange of personal data and classified information
o osnutku Sklepa Sveta o sprejetju pravil o varovanju tajnosti informacij Europola
on the draft Council decision adopting the rules on the confidentiality of Europol information
o osnutku Sklepa Sveta o sprejetju pravil o varovanju tajnosti informacij Europola(11943/2009 – C7
on the draft Council decision adopting the rules on the confidentiality of Europol information
– ob upoštevanju besedila Sveta (11943/2009),
– having regard to the text of the Council (11943/2009),
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) in člena 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0105/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0105/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7‑0065/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7‑0065/2009 ),
Pravila za varovanje tajnosti informacij Europola
Rules on the confidentiality of Europol information
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1717/2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za stabilnost
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1717/2006 establishing an Instrument for Stability
Poročevalka: Franziska Katharina Brantner
Rapporteur: Franziska Katharina Brantner
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0195 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0195 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 179(1) in 181a Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7‑0042/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 179(1) and 181a of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0042/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7‑0066/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A7‑0066/2009 ),
Člen 4 – točka 1 – točka a
Article 4 – point 1 – point a
(2) V členu 4(1) se točka (a) nadomesti z naslednjim:
(2) In Article 4(1), point (a) is replaced by the following:
(2) V členu 4(1) se prvi pododstavek točke (a) nadomesti z naslednjim:
(2) In Article 4(1), the first subparagraph of point (a) is replaced by the following:
„(a) okrepitev zmogljivosti organov pregona in sodnih organov ter civilne oblasti, vključenih v boj proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu, vključno z nezakonitim prometom z ljudmi, drogami, strelnim orožjem, orožjem malega kalibra ter lahkih orožjem in eksplozivnimi snovmi, ter v učinkovit nadzor nad nezakonito trgovino in tranzitom.“
“(a) strengthening the capacity of law enforcement and judicial and civil authorities involved in the fight against terrorism and organised crime, including illicit trafficking of people, drugs, firearms, small arms and light weapons, explosive materials and in the effective control of illegal trade and transit.”
Predlog spremembe je tehnične narave, njegov namen pa je popraviti izpust v predlogu Komisije.
The amendment is of technical nature and aims to correct the proposal's omission.
Komisija je nameravala spremeniti zgolj besedilo prvega pododstavka (od štirih).
The Commission's intention was to change the wording of the 1st subparagraph only (out of four).
Člen 4 – točka 3 – točka b a (novo)
Article 4 – point 3 – point b a (new)
(2a) V členu 4(3) se doda naslednja točka:
(2 a) In Article 4 (3) , the following point shall be inserted:
„(ba) razvoja in organiziranja civilne družbe ter njene udeležbe v političnem procesu, vključno z ukrepi za okrepitev vloge žensk v tem procesu in ukrepi za spodbujanje neodvisnih, pluralističnih in profesionalnih medijev.“
"(ba) develop ing and organis ing civil society and its participation in the political process, including measures to enhance the role of women in such processes and measures to promote independent, pluralist and professional media . "
Civilna družba bi morala prejemati podporo ne le v kriznih razmerah, kot je navedeno pri prvotnem instrumentu za stabilnost, temveč tudi na dolgi rok v stabilnih razmerah za sodelovanje na področju izgradnje zmogljivosti pred krizo in po njej.
Civil society should be granted support not only in crisis situations, as stated in the original Instrument for Stability, but also in the long-term in context of stable conditions for cooperation in the area of pre- and post-crisis building.
Člen 4 – točka 3 – pododstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 4 – point 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
(2b) V členu 4(3) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
(2 b) In Article 4 ( 3 ) , the following subparagraph shall be added :
„Ukrepi pod to točko se lahko, če je primerno, izvajajo s pomočjo partnerstva EU za izgradnjo miru.”
" Measures under this point may be implemented, if appropriate, by means of the EU Peace-building Partnership."
Instrument za stabilnost bi se moral sklicevati na partnerstvo EU za izgradnjo miru, ki ga je Komisija že vzpostavila na področju izgradnje zmogljivosti pred in po nastopu krize.
The Instrument for Stability should make a reference to the EU Peace-building Partnership, already established by the Commission in the field of pre- and post-crisis capacity building .
Člen 1 - točka 4
Article 1 - point 4
Člen 24 – točka (c)
Article 24 – point c
(c) za ukrepe iz člena 4(3) nameni največ 5 odstotnih točk finančnih sredstev.“
(c) no more than 5 percentage points of the financial envelope shall be allocated to measures falling under Article 4(3).”
(c) za ukrepe iz člena 4(3) nameni največ 10 odstotnih točk finančnih sredstev , če je povišanje v skladu s sedanjim pregledom partnerstva EU za izgradnjo miru in notranjih sredstev.“
(c) no more than 10 percentage points of the financial envelope shall be allocated to measures falling under Article 4(3) , provided the increase is in line with the current review of the EU Peace-building Partnership and internal resources .”
Kljub posebnemu strokovnemu znanju, ki ga ima na voljo EU na tem področju, je vlaganje v to primerjalno prednost še vedno neustrezno.
Despite the fact that the EU has a special expertise in peace-building and conflict resolution, the investment in this comparative advantage still remains inadequate.
Odbor za razvoj zato predlaga, da se odstotne točke izgradnje zmogljivosti pred in po nastopu krize povišajo s 5 na 10 %.
The Committee on Development proposes to increase the percentage of pre- and post-crisis capacity building from 5 to 10%.
Mnenje o spremenjeni uredbi
Views on the amending Regulation
Odbor za zunanje zadeve v okviru širše revizije finančne pomoči EU na področju zunanje politike pozdravlja predlog Komisije za uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi uredbe (ES) št. 1717/2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za stabilnost ( KOM(2009)0195 ).
The Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) welcomes the Commission's proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1717/2006 establishing an Instrument for Stability COM(2009)0195 , as part of a wider review of the external financial assistance of the EU.
Odbor se strinja, da je revizija členov 3(2)(i) in 4(1)(a) iz prvotne uredbe potrebna, da bi jo uskladili s sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 20. maja 2008, pri kateri je bilo ugotovljeno, da lahko Skupnost v okviru svoje razvojne politike izvaja ukrepe za boj proti širjenju orožja malega kalibra in lahkega orožja.
Firstly, AFET agrees that a revision of Article 3(2)(i) and Article 4(1)(a) of the original Regulation are necessary in order to bring it in conformity with the ruling of the European Court of Justice of 20 May 2008 which found that measures against the proliferation of small arms and light weapons may be implemented by the Community under its development policy.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve prav tako meni, da mora Komisija hkrati s predlaganim povišanjem najvišjega možnega zneska za izvajanje ukrepov iz člena 4(1) prvotne uredbe s 7 % na 10 % oblikovati jasnejšo strategijo (vključno z delitvijo nalog med Komisijo in Svetom v skladu s sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi ECOWAS), Evropski parlament pa je treba obveščati o uporabi namenjenih sredstev ter vsebini načrtovanih projektov.
Secondly, AFET is of the view that the proposed increase of the maximum financial amount for the implementation of measures under Article 4 (1) of the original Regulation from 7% to 10 % must be coupled with Commission's clearer strategy (including division of labour between the Commission and the Council following the ruling of the European Court of Justice in the ECOWAS case) and reporting to the European Parliament on the implementation the earmarked funds and content of planned projects.
Odbor se strinja s tem, da je treba pri javnih naročilih ali dodeljevanju pogodb o donaciji na podlagi člena 4(3) omogočiti sodelovanje vsem.
Thirdly, AFET agrees with the opening up to global participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts under Article 4(3).
Poročilo upošteva tudi dodatne vidike, ki niso obravnavani v predlogu Komisije.
Additional aspects, not tackled in the Commission's proposal, are addressed in the report.