natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dublinska uredba poleg tega vsebuje dve diskrecijski določbi, s katerima se zagotovi ustrezna prilagodljivost sistema.
The Dublin Regulation also includes two discretionary provisions which ensure that the system has the requisite degree of flexibility.
Gre za tako imenovano „določbo o prenosu suverenosti“, ki določa, da lahko vsaka država članica obravnava prošnjo za azil, tudi če to obravnavanje ni njena odgovornost glede na merila iz uredbe (člen 3(2)), in humanitarno določbo, ki določa, da lahko vsaka država članica, tudi če ni odgovorna za obravnavanje prošnje glede na merila iz uredbe, obravnava tako prošnjo na zahtevo druge države članice na podlagi družinskih ali kulturnih vidikov (člen 15).
These are the 'sovereignty clause' - which enables a Member State to examine an application for asylum even if such examination is not its responsibility under the criteria laid down in the Regulation (Article 3(2)) - and the humanitarian clause, which enables a Member State (even if it is not responsible for dealing with an application pursuant to the criteria set out in the Regulation) to examine that application at the request of another Member State on the basis of family or cultural considerations (Article 15).
Dublinska uredba določa mehanizme za sprejem in ponovni sprejem prosilcev za azil (poglavje V) ter vključuje določbe v zvezi z administrativnim sodelovanjem (poglavje VI).
The Dublin Regulation establishes mechanisms for the taking charge and the taking back of asylum-seekers (Chapter V) and it includes provisions relating to administrative cooperation (Chapter VI).
Člen 28 uredbe določa, da Komisija najpozneje tri leta po začetku izvajanja uredbe poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi zadevne uredbe ter po potrebi predlaga potrebne spremembe.
Pursuant to Article 28 of the Regulation, the Commission shall report - at the latest three years after the entry into force of the Regulation - to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Regulation and, where appropriate, shall propose any necessary amendments.
To samoiniciativno poročilo je odziv na to oceno.
This own-initiative report is in response to the Commission's evaluation.
Težave z metodologijo
Methodology problems
Pri branju ocene Komisije se je poročevalec srečal z različnimi težavami, ki so oteževale njegovo nalogo.
In reading the Commission's evaluation, your rapporteur came up against a variety of problems which made her task an arduous one.
Pravzaprav tudi z natančnim branjem poročila o oceni in njegove priloge ni mogel povsem slediti razmišljanju Komisije v sklepnih ugotovitvah, ki so sicer precej omejene, ker obsegajo le okrog deset vrstic poročila, ki jih je Komisija povzela iz svoje ocene.
Not even an assiduous reading of the evaluation report and of the annex thereto enabled her at all times to follow the line of argument pursued by the Commission in its conclusions (which are in any case fairly insubstantial, since they comprise merely ten or so lines from the report which have been extracted from the Commission's evaluation.
V zvezi s tem je zanimivo, da priloga, ki obsega več kot 50 strani, vsebuje uvod, v katerem so navedena štiri merila, ki jih je Komisija uporabila kot podlago za „učinkovito oceno“ dublinskega sistema
In this connection it is interesting to note that the annex - which comprises over 50 pages - contains an introduction (in which the four criteria taken as a basis by the Commission for 'measur[ing]' the performance' of the Dublin system
V teh okoliščinah je bil poročevalec prisiljen, da sam poskusi oceniti merila, ki jih je opredelila Komisija, da bi lahko oblikoval svoje mnenje o učinkovitosti sistema.
In these circumstances your rapporteur has herself had to try to evaluate the Commission's criteria in order to gauge the effectiveness of the system.
Prvo merilo je vključevalo preverjanje, „ ali je dublinski sistem izpolnil svoje cilje, ki so jasno opredeljeni v preambuli uredbe “.
The first criterion involved considering ' whether the application of the Dublin system has fulfilled its objectives, which are clearly indicated in the preamble of the Dublin Regulation .'
Komisija v svojem poročilu v sklepnih ugotovitvah navaja, da so bili „cilji dublinskega sistema, zlasti da se vzpostavi jasen in učinkovit mehanizem za določanje odgovornosti glede prošenj za azil, […] v veliki meri doseženi“
In its report the Commission announces in its conclusions that 'overall, the objectives of the Dublin system, notably to establish a clear and workable mechanism for determining responsibility for asylum applications, have, to a large extent, been achieved
Glede na pomanjkljivosti, ki jih Komisija zelo odločno izpostavlja v svoji oceni, in pojasnitve, s katerimi poskuša upravičeno pojasniti določbe uredbe, je ta trditev, ki je sicer dovolj nejasna, da jo je težko spodbijati, vseeno presenetljiva.
Given the number of shortcomings which the Commission very judiciously highlights in its evaluation and the number of clarifications which it rightly intends to incorporate into the provisions of the Regulation, such a statement (which, incidentally, is too vague to be easily challenged) is nonetheless surprising.
Kaže, da boj proti pojavu tavajočih beguncev in izbiranja države azila, ki se na drugem delu priloge obravnava kot eden od glavnih ciljev dublinskega sistema, v nobenem primeru ni bil uspešen, ker se je odstotek večkratnih prošenj povečal s 7 % leta 2003 na 16 % leta 2005, zaradi česar je morala Komisija ugotoviti, da dublinski sistem ni imel pričakovanega vpliva na tem področju
With regard to action to combat the phenomena of 'refugees in orbit' and 'asylum-shopping' (which are regarded in another part of the annex as one of the main objectives of the Dublin system), this does not appear in all cases to have been successful, since the percentage of multiple applications increased from 7% in 2003 to 16% in 2005, which leads the Commission itself to conclude that the Dublin system has not had the expected deterrent effect
Drugo merilo , ki ga navaja Komisija, je povezano z vprašanjem, „ ali so se z dublinsko uredbo rešile nekatere težave z izvajanjem dublinske konvencije ... in sicer roki za obravnavanje prošenj, združitev družin in splošno učinkovitost sistema, pri čemer gre zlasti za dejanske predaje“ .
The second criterion adopted by the Commission was concerned with establishing ‘ whether the Dublin Regulation has addressed some of the particular problems noted in the application of the Dublin Convention . .. namely , time limits for request-processing, family uni fication and the system’s overall efficiency, in particular the implementation of transfers. ’
Komisija v svojem poročilu izpostavlja, da so težave s predajami, od katerih se jih dejansko izvrši le približno tretjina, ena od glavnih ovir za učinkovito izvajanje sistema
In its report the Commission points out that the problem of transfers (of which only about one-third actually take place) constitutes one of the main obstacles to the effective implementation of the system
Od 40 180 sprejetih prošenj je bilo od septembra 2003 do decembra 2005 izvršenih le 16 842 predaj. .
Although 40,180 applications were accepted, only 16,842 transfers took place between September 2003 and December 2005. .
Združitev družine, ki je glavno merilo v uredbi, se uporablja bolj v teoriji kot v praksi, ker Komisija v prilogi navaja, da se določbe iz uredbe v zvezi s tem „le redko uporabljajo“
As regards family reunification (which is listed as the first criterion in the Regulation), this would appear to be more theoretical than real, since the Commission states in the Annex that the relevant provisions of the Regulation are only ‘very rarely applied
Tretje merilo je zlasti povezano s številom dejanskih predaj , pri čemer presenetljivo nizko število predaj kaže na pomanjkljivosti sistema, kar bi bilo treba jasneje razložiti.
The third criterion was specifically concerned with the number of effective transfers , the surprisingly low rate of which is indicative of the shortcomings in the system and should be explained more clearly.
Četrto merilo je bilo povezano z „ vplivom dublinskega sistema na azilne sisteme različnih držav članic“ , pri čemer je bil cilj analize opredeliti, ali ta sistem dobro ali slabo vpliva na nekatere države članice.
The fourth criterion was concerned with ‘ the influence of the Dublin system on the individual asylum systems of Member States ’, the purpose of the analysis being to determine whether the Dublin system benefited certain Member States or put them at a disadvantage.
Poročevalec meni, da je analiza Komisije v zvezi z „migracijskimi tokovi v okviru dublinskega sistema“, ki temelji na tem četrtem merilu, vprašljiva zaradi več razlogov.
In the rapporteur’s view the Commission’s analysis of the ‘Dublin flows’ (which relates to this fourth criterion) is to be questioned on various grounds.
Kot je Komisija tudi sama navedla v prilogi, so na eni strani statistični podatki, ki jih predložijo države članice, zelo različni
Firstly (as the Commission itself states in the Annex), there are disparities in the statistical data provided by the Member States
6. , ker nekatere države na primer obravnavajo celo družino kot en primer, medtem ko druge upoštevajo vsakega družinskega člana posebej.
6. : for example, certain Member States count an entire family as a single case, whereas others count each individual member of the family.
Končno, kot Komisija jasno navaja v svoji oceni, kaže, da kljub „presenetljivo nizkemu“ številu oseb, ki nezakonito prestopijo mejo in so registrirane v bazi podatkov Eurodac
Lastly, as the Commission makes clear in its evaluation, it would appear - in view of the ‘surprisingly low’ number of illegal entrants registered in the Eurodac database
9. , vse države članice ne upoštevajo obveznosti jemanja prstnih odtisov oseb, ki so prijete zaradi nezakonitega prehoda zunanje meje.
9. - that the obligation to fingerprint all illegal entrants at the EU’s external borders is not complied with by all the Member States.
Vendar so ti podatki, ki so vneseni v Eurodac, nujno potrebni za izvajanje enega od dublinskih meril ter za vsako kritično in objektivno oceno delovanja sistema ter njegovih učinkov.
However, the data registered on Eurodac are essential not only to the application of one of the Dublin criteria but also to any critical, objective evaluation of the functioning and the repercussions of the system.
Kot države na zunanjih mejah se upoštevajo države, ki imajo kopensko mejo s tretjo državo, in države, ki imajo morsko mejo s tretjo državo, ter so izpostavljene migracijskim pritiskom : Estonija, Litva, Latvija, Poljska, Slovaška, Slovenija, Madžarska, Romunija, Bolgarija, Italija, Španija, Malta, Grčija, Portugalska in Ciper.
Countries which have land borders with non-EU countries and ones which have maritime borders exposed to migratory pressures are regarded as countries with external borders : Estonia, la Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Italy, Spain, Malta, Greece, Portugal and Cyprus.
Kot države brez zunanje meje se obravnavajo: Švedska, Norveška, Islandija, Danska, Irska, Združeno kraljestvo, Nizozemska, ZRN, Belgija, Luksemburg, Francija, Avstrija, Češkoslovaška, Finska. .
The following countries are deemed to have no external borders : Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, Ireland, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the Federal Republic of Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Austria, the Czech Republic and Finland. .
Končno, zdi se, da optimističen zaključek Komisije v njeni oceni, tj. da so bili cilji dublinskega sistema „v veliki meri doseženi“, bolj temelji na pozitivnem dojemanju sistema, ki je lahko skupno ali ne, kot pa na temeljiti analizi, ki je težko izvedljiva zaradi velikih razlik med podatki, ki so na voljo.
To summarise, it would appear that the optimistic conclusion drawn by the Commission from its evaluation (namely, that ‘the objectives of the Dublin system ... have, to a large extent, been achieved’ ) is based more on a favourable bias towards the system (which one may or may not share) than on a r igorous analysis (which would in any case be difficult to carry out on account of the gaps and the disparities in the data available).
Predlogi za spremembo uredbe
Proposed amendments to the Regulation
Poročevalec zlasti na podlagi težav, ki jih je odkrila Komisija, predlaga, da se pojasnijo ali spremenijo naslednji vidiki sistema:
On the basis in particular of the problems unearthed by the Commission, your rapporteur suggests that the following aspects of the system should be clarified or modified:
Spoštovanje temeljnega načela nevračanja: vsako prošnjo je treba temeljito preučiti, pri čemer se nobena zadeva ne sme zaključiti iz „postopkovnih“ razlogov brez preučitve.
Observance of the basic principle of non-refoulement : all requests must be examined in detail and no file may be closed for 'procedural' reasons unless such an examination has been carried out.
Prosilci za azil morajo prejeti vse koristne informacije o dublinskem sistemu v jeziku, ki ga razumejo, poleg tega pa morajo imeti dostop do pravne pomoči med celotnim postopkom; imeti morajo tudi pravico do pritožbe z odložilnim učinkom zoper vsako odločitev o predaji.
Applicants must receive all relevant information concerning the Dublin system in a language which they understand and they must have access to legal aid throughout the procedure; they must also have the right to a suspensory appeal against any transfer decision.
Merila v zvezi z določitvijo starosti mladoletnikov je treba uskladiti, poleg tega pa je mogoče mladoletnike predati le v izjemnih primerih in če je to v njihovem interesu; med predajo morajo imeti ustrezno spremstvo in zastopnike, s čimer se prepreči, da bi kateri od otrok izginil.
The criteria for determining the age of minors should be harmonised and minors should not be transferred other than in exceptional cases, if doing so is in their interest; they should be duly accompanied and represented during transfer, in order to ensure that they do not go missing.
Opredelitev družine je treba razširiti tako, da se bolj upoštevajo zakoniti interesi prosilcev; določbe v zvezi z združitvijo družine je treba razširiti na mladoletnike in na upravičence do subsidiarne zaščite.
The definition of the family should be broadened, so that greater account can be taken of applicants' legitimate interests; the provisions relating to family reunification should be extended to the applicants for (or the beneficiaries of) subsidiary protection.
Predvideti je treba, da bi postale nekatere od humanitarnih določb zavezujoče, zlasti v zvezi s posebej ranljivimi osebami.
Consideration should be given to making certain provisions of the humanitarian clause mandatory, particularly in the case of especially vulnerable people.
Določbe o prenosu suverenosti se lahko uveljavljajo le, če prosilec privoli v to.
The sovereignty clause should not be activated without the applicant's consent.
Pridržanje prosilca je mogoče le, če je to nujno potrebno in ustrezno utemeljeno, pri čemer morajo imeti prosilci, ki čakajo na predajo, enake pogoje za sprejem kot drugi prosilci.
Detention should not be applied other than in cases of duly justified absolute necessity and applicants awaiting transfer should be accommodated under the same conditions as any other applicant.
Pripraviti je treba mehanizme za ustavitev predaj v države, v katerih so pravice prosilcev očitno kršene, ali v države, ki imajo v nekaterih obdobjih velike migracijske pritiske.
Mechanisms should be devised for blocking transfers to countries which plainly do not uphold applicants' rights or to ones which are required to cope with strong migratory pressures at certain periods.
Pred razširitvijo dostopa do baze podatkov Eurodac na organe pregona in Europol je treba v vsakem primeru rešiti sedanje težave in predvideti potrebna zagotovila na področju varstva osebnih podatkov.
Before any consideration is given to extending access to the Eurodac database to the forces of order and to Europol, existing problems should be resolved and the necessary safeguards concerning the protection of personal data should be put in place.
Poročevalec meni, da moramo preučiti, ali dublinski sistem zares ustreza svojemu namenu.
Your Rapporteur considers that we must bring into question whether the Dublin system is really 'fit for purpose'.
Zdi se, da sistem določa nesorazmerno odgovornost za države članice na mejah EU, in čeprav se s tem pojasni, katera država članica je odgovorna za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ni nobenih resničnih mehanizmov za zagotavljanje podpore tem državam.
It would appear that the system is assigning a disproportionate amount of responsibility towards Member States at the borders of the EU, and whilst this clarifies which Member State is responsible for examining the asylum claim, there are no real mechanisms for providing these States' support.
Poleg tega je pri obravnavanju pomena vključevanja treba bolj upoštevati obstoječe vezi med prosilci za azil in posameznimi državami članicami, kjer je zadevna skupnost že nastanjena, ali s katero ima prosilec za azil skupni jezik ali kulturo.
Furthermore, considering the importance of integration, more account should be taken of existing links between asylum seekers and specific Member States where a relevant community has already settled, or with which the asylum seeker has a language or culture in common.
Bistvena težava je še vedno, da bodo prosilci, dokler jim vse države članice ne bodo zagotovile enake ali vsaj enakovredne ravni in kakovosti zaščite, še naprej raje vlagali prošnje v nekaterih državah članicah ali bodo vložili več prošenj in se tako izognili določbam dublinskega sistema.
However, one fundamental problem still remains, which is that until all the Member States offer all applicants a level and a quality of protection which are, if not identical, then at least equivalent and of high quality, applicants will continue to have a legitimate interest in submitting their application in one Member State rather than another, or they will be tempted to submit multiple applications and thus to circumvent the provisions of the Dublin system.
Ta težnja se lahko z omejenim izvajanjem merila o združitvi družine le še okrepi.
This is a trend which restrictive application of the family-reunification criterion would only accentuate.
Te težave ni mogoče rešiti z revizijo dublinske uredbe, ampak z revizijo prihodnjih instrumentov skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema.
The problem cannot be solved through revision of the Dublin Regulation but it should be tackled when the forthcoming instruments of the common European asylum system are revised.
Eden od glavnih ciljev revizije dublinske uredbe mora biti, da se poskušajo čim bolj upoštevati zakonite želje prosilcev, da se zagotovi njihovo obveščanje in obravnava prošenj v čim boljših pogojih, in sicer povsem v skladu z ženevsko konvencijo.
As regards the Dublin Regulation, one of the main aims of the revision should be to take the greatest possible account of applicants' legitimate wishes, to provide them with information and to ensure that their application is dealt with under optimum conditions and in full accordance with the Geneva Convention.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statističnih poročilih glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (recast)
(Prenovitev – člen 80a Poslovnika)
(Recast – Rule 80a of the Rules of Procedure)
PISMO ODBORA ZA PROMET IN TURIZEM.........................................................................9
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM.....................................9
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0859 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0859 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 285(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0001/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0001/2008 ),
UL L 77, 28.03.02, str.
OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0288/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0288/2008 ),
Komisija prilagodi parametre zbiranja podatkov in vsebino prilog I do VIII gospodarskemu in tehničnemu razvoju, če taka prilagoditev ne vodi do bistvenega zvišanja stroškov za države članice in/ali obremenitve dajalcev podatkov.
The Commission shall adapt the data collection characteristics and the content of Annexes I to VIII to economic and technical developments in so far as such adaptation does not involve a substantial increase in cost for the Member States and/or in the burden on respondents.
Navedeni ukrepi, ki so namenjeni spremembi nebistvenih določb te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 11(3).
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 11(3).
Komisija predlaga uvedbo regulativnega postopka s pregledom za člene 3, 4, 5 in za spremembo prilog I do VII ter predlaga ohranitev upravljalnega postopka za člena 7 in 9.
The Commission proposes to introduce RPS for Articles 3, 4, 5 as well as for modification of Annexes I to VII, and proposes to keep the management procedure for Article 7 and 9.
Ponovitev večine od teh prenosov pooblastil v členu 10 zlasti glede na uvodni stavek („ukrepi za [...] prilagoditev[direktive] gospodarskemu in tehničnemu razvoju“, lahko povzroči zmedo in se ji je bolje izogniti.
The repetition of most of these delegations in Article 10, especially in view of its opening sentence (on "measures for adapting [the Directive] to economic and technical developments ") can be confusing and should thus be avoided.
Ta sprememba se predlaga, da bi se ohranil postopek za prilagoditev člena 3 in prilog.
In order to maintain the procedure for adapting Article 3 and the Annexes, this amendment is proposed.
Podrobna pravila za izvajanje
Detailed rules of implementation
Sprejmejo se podrobna pravila za izvajanje te direktive, vključno z ukrepi za njeno prilagoditev gospodarskemu in tehničnemu razvoju, in zlasti:
Detailed rules for implementing this Directive, including measures for adapting it to economic and technical developments shall be adopted, in particular:
(a) prilagoditev parametrov zbiranja podatkov (člen 3) in vsebine prilog I do VIII, če taka prilagoditev ne vodi do bistvenega zvišanja stroškov za države članice in/ali obremenitve dajalcev podatkov:
(a) adaptation of the data collection characteristics (Article 3) and of the content of Annexes I to VIII in so far as such adaptation does not involve a substantial increase in cost for the Member States and/or the burden on respondents;
(b) seznam pristanišč, ki ga Komisija redno posodablja, označenih in razvrščenih po državi in morskem obalnem območju (člen 4):
(b) a list of ports, updated on a regular basis by the Commission, coded and classified by country and maritime coastal area (Article 4);
(c) zahteva po točnosti (člen 5):
(c) accuracy requirement (Article 5);
(d) opis sestave podatkovne zbirke in oznake za posredovanje rezultatov Komisiji (Eurostat) (člen 7):
(d) the description of the composition of a data file and codes for transmission of the results to the Commission (Eurostat) (Article 7);
(e) podrobnosti objave in diseminacije podatkov (člen 9):
(e) the arrangements for publication or dissemination of the data (Article 9).
Ukrepi iz točk (d) in (e) se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 11(2).
The measures referred to in points (d) and (e) shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 11(2).