natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sodišče je 6. novembra 2008 razsodilo, da:
On 6 November 2008, the Court judged that :
–je sedanji sklep 2006/1016/ES razveljavljen,
- the existing Decision 2006/1016/EC is annulled
–se njegovi učinki ohranijo za obdobje 12 mesecev,
- its effects are maintained for a 12 months period
–mora biti novi sklep sprejet z dvojno pravno podlago, in sicer členom 179 in 181a, kar zahteva postopek soodločanja.
- the new decision should be adopted under a dual legal basis, namely Articles 179 and 181a, which implies a co-decision procedure.
Novi predlog
The new proposal
V primerjavi z razveljavljenim sklepom 2006/1016/ES se novi sklep razlikuje pri omejenemu številu točk, med drugim:
In comparison to annulled Decision 2006/1016/EC, the new proposal for a Decision differs on a limited number of points, amongst others :
–dvojna pravna podlaga členov 179 in 181a ES, kar pomeni, da je za sprejetje celotnega sklepa potreben postopek soodločanja,
- reference to a dual legal basis of articles 179 and 181a EC, which implies the co-decision procedure for the adoption of the entire Decision
Skrajšani postopek in prehodni vidiki
F ast-track procedure and transitional aspects
Predlogu Komisije pa primanjkuje eden od glavnih delov.
Nevertheless, a main element is missing in the Commission proposal.
Predlog bi moral biti razumljen kot »skrajšan« in »prehoden«:
Actually, this proposal should be understood as a "fast-track" and "transitional" one;
–»skrajšan« zaradi upoštevanja težavnosti izvajanja običajnega postopka soodločanja pred 6. novembrom 2009 zaradi parlamentarnih volitev (na plenarnih zasedanjih se več kot štiri mesece v letu 2009 ne bo moralo obravnavati zakonodajnih zadev);
- "fast-track" to take into consideration the difficulty to have a regular codecision procedure before 6 November 2009 due to the Parliament's elections (Plenary will not be in a position to pronounce itself on legislative matters during more than four months in 2009);
–»prehoden« ker je treba v novem sklepu po postopku soodločanja upoštevati zaključke vmesnega pregleda EIB;
- "transitional" since the conclusions of the mid-term review of EIB have to be taken into consideration in a new codecided Decision;
Zato želi poročevalec jasno časovno opredeliti zaporedje zakonodajnih besedil, ki obravnavajo odobritev jamstva Skupnosti za zunanja posojila EIB, da bodo uveljavljene posebne pravice Parlamenta na podlagi sodbe Sodišča:
For these reasons, your rapporteur wishes to time-frame clearly the sequence of legislative texts dealing with the granting of the Community guarantee to EIB external loans, in order to assert Parliament's prerogatives following Court Judgement :
–učinki razveljavljenega sklepa 2006/1016/ES prenehajo veljati 6. novembra 2009,
- the effects of the annulled Decision 2006/1016/EC expire on 6 November 2009
–veljavni sklep preneha veljati na datum, ki bo določen s Svetom,
- the present Decision shall expire on a precise date, to be defined with the Council
–naslednji predlog sklepa, ki bo upošteval zaključke vmesnega pregleda, mora biti predložen pred koncem mandata sedanje Komisije; predlagani rok je 28. februar 2010.
- the next proposal for a Decision, taking into account the conclusions of the mid-term review, must be presented before the end of the mandate of the current Commission; the proposed deadline is 28 February 2010.
Poročevalec želi opomniti, da je Parlament že med preteklimi postopki med drugim izrazil svojo skrb zaradi skladnosti med tem sklepom in zunanjimi politikami EU o človekovih pravicah in pravni državi v tretjih državah, zaradi pomanjkanja nadzora nad različnimi proračunskimi in neproračunskimi odločitvami EIB in Komisije ter zaradi sedanjega odstotnega deleža omejevanja jamstva Skupnosti.
Finally, your rapporteur wishes to recall that the Parliament has already, in the past procedures, expressed, amongst others, its concerns about the coherence between this Decision and EU external policies on human rights and rule of law in third countries, its concerns about the lack of scrutiny over the various budgetary and non-budgetary decisions taken by the EIB and the Commission, and its concerns about the actual limitation percentage of Community guarantee.
Poudarja, da bo treba te točke nujno obravnavati med postopkom soodločanja.
He underlines that these points will definitely have to be dealt with during the co-decision procedure.
Jamstvo Skupnosti za Evropsko investicijsko banko
Community guarantee to the EIB
Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Date appointed
Marusja Ivanova Ljubčeva, Paul Rübig, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Peter Šťastný
Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Paul Rübig, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Peter Šťastný
o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira 2007 – 2013
on the Mid-Term Review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................34
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................34
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................37
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................37
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor .............................................................40
OPINION of the Committee on Budgetary Control ........................................39
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................43
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............42
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................48
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................47
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................52
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...51
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................56
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................55
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ES, zlasti njenih členov 268 do 280,
– having regard to the EC Treaty and in particular Articles 268 to 280 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju potekajočega postopka ratifikacije lizbonske pogodbe,
– having regard to the ongoing ratification process of the Treaty of Lisbon,
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Budgetary Discipline and Sound Financial Management
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 3. novembra 2008 o reformi proračuna v spreminjajoči se Evropi ( SEC(2008)2739 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document of 3 November 2008 on Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe ( SEC(2008)2739 ),
– ob upoštevanju konference z naslovom Reforma proračuna v spreminjajoči se Evropi, ki jo je priredila Komisija 12. novembra 2008,
– having regard to the Conference on Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe hosted by the Commission on 12 November 2008,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 13. decembra 2007
– having regard to its resolutions of 13 December 2007
UL C 323 E, 18.12.08, str.
OJ C 323 E, 18.12.2008, p.
454. in 18. decembra 2008
454. and of 18 December 2008
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0622 . o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008 in 2009 (vsi oddelki),
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0622 . on the 2008 and 2009 draft general budgets of the European Union (all sections),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. marca 2007 o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev Evropske unije
– having regard to its resolution of 29 March 2007 on the future of the European Union's own resources
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0098 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2007)0098 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. decembra 2007 o spremenjenem predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju v zvezi z večletnim finančnim okvirom
– having regard to its resolution of 12 December 2007 on the amended proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regards the multi-annual financial framework
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 4. decembra 2008 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi instrumenta za hitro odzivanje na hitro naraščajoče cene hrane v državah v razvoju
– having regard to its position of 4 December 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2008)0576 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2008)0576 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. februarja 2008 o četrtem poročilu o gospodarski in socialni koheziji
– having regard to its resolution of 21 February 2008 on the 4th report on economic and social cohesion
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0068 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2008)0068 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. marca 2008 o sistematskem pregledu skupne kmetijske politike
– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2008 on the CAP "Health Check"
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0093 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2008)0093 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta s 15. in 16. decembra 2005, 21. in 22. junija 2007 in 11. ter 12. decembra 2008,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Councils of 15-16 December 2005, 21-22 June 2007 and 11-12 December 2008,
– – ob upoštevanju odgovora Evropskega računskega sodišča na sporočilo Komisije "Reforma proračuna v spreminjajoči se Evropi" ( SEC(2007)1188 ),
– having regard to the response by the European Court of Auditors to the Commission's communication "Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe" ( SEC(2007)1188 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za proračunski nadzor, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbor za regionalni razvoj ter Odbora za kmetijstvo ( A6‑0110/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Development, the Committee on Budgetary Control, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Agriculture ( A6‑0110/2009 ),
A. ker so Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija sklenili medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju po intenzivnih pogajanjih na podlagi pogajalskega stališča Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. junija 2005, ki je temeljilo na poglobljeni analizi potreb, da bi se tako opredelile politične prednostne naloge, in na sporazumu, ki so ga sklenile države članice leta 2005,
A. whereas the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed on the IIA of 17 May 2006 on Budgetary Discipline and Sound Financial Management following intense negotiations based on the European Parliament's negotiating position of 8 June 2005, based on an in-depth analysis of the needs in order to identify political priorities, and on the agreement achieved by the Member States in 2005,
B. ker medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 predvideva, da bo Komisija poročala o delovanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma do konca leta 2009, in poziva Komisijo, da opravi obsežen pregled, ki bo zajemal vse vidike odhodkov EU, vključno s Skupno kmetijsko politiko in viri, vključno s popustom Združenega kraljestva, in da poroča v obdobju 2008 – 2009,
B. whereas the IIA of 17 May 2006 provides that the Commission will report on the functioning of the IIA by the end of 2009 and invites the Commission to undertake a full wide-ranging review covering all aspects of EU spending, including the Common Agricultural Policy and resources, including the UK rebate, and to report in 2008-2009,
C. ker je Komisija septembra 2007 začela z obširnim javnim posvetovanjem, ki je zbralo več kot 300 prispevkov, in je 12. novembra 2008 priredila konferenco na temo Reforma proračuna v spreminjajoči se Evropi, ki je pomenila prvi korak postopka pregleda,
C. whereas the Commission launched a wide public consultation in September 2007, to which more than 300 contributions were made, and hosted a conference "Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe" on 12 November 2008 which marked the first step of the review process,
D. ker Komisija namerava predstaviti sporočilo, v katerem bodo predstavljene glavne smernice, ki bi morale določiti naslednji finančni okvir najkasneje jeseni 2009 in predstaviti poročilo o delovanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (drugi korak postopka), medtem ko bo nova Komisija v letu 2010 pripravljala predloge za prihodnji večletni finančni okvir in medinstitucionalni sporazum (tretji korak),
D. whereas the Commission intends to present a Communication outlining the main orientations that should design the next financial framework at the latest in Autumn 2009 and should present a report on the functioning of the IIA (step two of the process) while the proposals for the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) and IIA will be made by the next Commission (step three) in the course of 2010,
E. ker postopek ratifikacije Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije še ni zaključen,
E. whereas the ratification process of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union is not yet completed,
F. ker je v finančnih določbah lizbonske pogodbe predvideno, da bo imel VFO pravno zavezujoči značaj v okviru Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in bo trajal vsaj 5 let,
F. whereas the financial provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon provide that the MFF will have legally binding status under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and have a duration of "at least 5 years",
G. ker je v lizbonski pogodbi predvidena razširitev pristojnosti Evropske unije, posledice tega se bodo morebiti odražale v številu novih politik, za katere bomo potrebovali primerne pravne osnove in sredstva,
G. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon provides for an extension of competences of the European Union, the consequences of which might be reflected in a number of new policies for which appropriate legal bases and financing might be necessary,
H. ker bi morale institucije zagotoviti, da bo časovni razpored naslednjega finančnega okvira omogočal demokratično legitimnost in bo kolikor mogoče ustrezal mandatu Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta, če se upošteva morebitno podaljšanje in prilagoditev večletnega finančnega okvira do 1015/2016,
H. whereas the institutions should ensure that the calendar of the next financial framework allows for democratic legitimacy and matching of the Commission and Parliament mandates as far as possible, considering a possible prolongation and adjustment of the current MFF until 2015/2016,
I. ker bi moralo biti imenovanje nove Komisije in s tem povezane predstavitve priložnost za na novo izvoljeni Parlament, da zasliši in oceni nove komisarje glede njihovih zadevnih političnih prednostnih nalog in oceni v ta namen potreben proračun,
I. whereas the designation of a new Commission and the hearings due to take place in this context should be an opportunity for the newly elected Parliament to question and evaluate the new Commissioners on their respective policy priorities and the budgets deemed necessary for that purpose,
1. opozarja, da je Parlament učinkovito prispeval k oblikovanju večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2007 – 2013 in medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, medtem ko je istočasno omogočal neprekinjen potek zakonodaje EU prek sprožanja ogromnega števila večletnih programov; meni, da je večina priporočil iz poročila Parlamenta še vedno veljavnih, saj so temeljila na načelu od spodaj navzgor, ki je povezalo naloge in obljube s potrebnimi proračunskimi sredstvi; s tem v zvezi meni, da bi se lahko nekatera splošna načela in široke smernice, ki temeljijo na preteklih izkušnjah, prenesla na bodoči Parlament;
Recalls that Parliament has intensively contributed to the setting-up of the 2007-2013 MFF and IIA of 17 May 2006 on Budgetary Discipline and Sound Financial Management while, in parallel, allowing the continuity of EU legislation through the launching of a huge number of multiannual programmes; thinks that most of the recommendations of the Parliament's report are still valid because they were based on a bottom-up approach that linked tasks and promises with the necessary budgetary means; in this context, is of the opinion that some broad principles and orientations based on past experience could be transmitted to the incoming Parliament;
Pristop v treh korakih
A three-step approach
(a) - reševanje primanjkljajev in ostankov v okviru letnih proračunskih postopkov, če je mogoče prek večje prožnosti in, če je treba, z uporabo dela rezerve, ki je ostal pod zgornjo mejo lastnih sredstev,
(a) - resolving deficits and left-overs in the context of the annual budgetary procedures, if possible through more flexibility and, if necessary, using part of the margin left below the own resources ceiling,
- ocena vmesnega vrednotenja,
- assessment of the mid-term evaluation,
(b) - priprava morebitne prilagoditve in podaljšanja trenutnega večletnega finančnega okvira do leta 2015/2016, da se omogoči gladek prehod sistema na petletni večletni finančni okvir, pri katerem bosta imela vsak sklic Parlamenta in Komisije v času trajanja mandata politično odgovornost za posamezni večletni finančni okvir,
(b) - preparation of a possible adjustment and prolongation of the current MFF until 2015/2016 in order to allow for a smooth transition for a system of an MFF of five years' duration which gives to each Parliament and each Commission, during each of their respective terms of office, the political responsibility for each MFF,
- morebitne prilagoditve in podaljšanje trenutnih programov, kakor jih predvideva zakonodaja (2010–2011) v skladu z morebitnim podaljšanjem večletnega finančnega okvira, kot je že večkrat zahteval Parlament,
- possible adjustments and prolongation of the current programmes as provided for by legislation (2010-2011) in line with the possible prolongation of the MFF, as already demanded several times by Parliament,
(c) - priprava naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje po letu 2016/2017; za ta korak bo odgovoren Parlament, ki bo izvoljen leta 2014;
(c) - preparation of the next MFF starting in 2016/2017; this phase will be the responsibility of the Parliament elected in 2014;
Sklep Sveta 2000/597/ES, Euratom z dne 29. septembra 2000 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 253, 7.10.2000, str.
Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources (OJ L 253, 7.10.2000, p.
(36.600.000.000 EUR za leto 2010, 44.200.000.000 EUR za leto 2011, 45.000.000.000 EUR za leto 2012 in 50.600.000.000 EUR za leto 2013)
(EUR 36 600 000 000 in 2010, EUR 44 200 000 000 in 2011, EUR 45 000 000 000 in 2012 and EUR 50 600 000 000 in 2013)
Zgornja meja lastnih sredstev v višini 1,24 % v primerjavi z zgornjo mejo večletnega finančnega okvira, ki temelji na ocenah za BND EU 27 za leto 2009. ;
1.24 % own resources ceiling vs. MAFF ceiling based on 2009 estimated EU 27 GNI. ;
10. meni, da trenutna svetovna gospodarska kriza ne sme vplivati na skupno količino virov EU, tudi če bo BND držav članic prenehal slediti vedno rastoči krivulji; zato je prepričan, da se morajo odhodki EU osredotočiti na politike z jasno evropsko dodano vrednostjo, ki je popolnoma v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, sorazmernosti in solidarnosti; opozarja, da v času krize obseg te dodane vrednosti v veliki meri temelji na temeljnem načelu solidarnosti med evropskimi narodi;
Believes that the general magnitude of EU resources must not be affected by the current world economic crisis, even if the Member States' GNI will cease to follow an ever increasing curve; is therefore convinced that EU spending should concentrate on policies with a clear European added value, fully in line with the principles of subsidiarity proportionality and solidarity; recalls that in a time of crisis this added value is measured largely in terms of the fundamental principle of solidarity between European peoples;
12. meni, da se politične prednostne naloge Unije zaradi globalizacije, demografskih sprememb, tehnološkega razvoja, potrebe po zagotavljanju zanesljivih in raznolikih virov dobave energije ter podnebnih sprememb stalno razvijajo, da je ponovna ocena in optimizacija porabe EU temeljnega pomena za doseganje največje dodane vrednosti in učinkovitosti ukrepov EU;
Believes, since the Union's policy priorities are in a state of constant evolution as a result of globalisation, demographic change, technological development, the need to ensure secure and diverse sources of energy supply, and climate change, that it is essential that EU spending be re-evaluated and optimised in order to achieve the highest value added and most effective EU action;
14. opozarja, da je v točki 21 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma predvideno, da se lahko finančni okvir ob nepredvidenih okoliščinah spremeni v skladu z najvišjimi obsegi lastnih sredstev; ponovno kritizira nespametno ravnanje Sveta, ki trdovratno nasprotuje uporabi te možnosti pregleda;
Recalls that point 21 of the IIA lays down that "in the event of unforeseen circumstances the financial framework may, on a proposal from the Commission, be revised in compliance with the own-resources ceiling"; once again criticises the irrational behaviour of the Council which repeatedly opposes the use of this possibility of revision;
16. ugotavlja, da je treba dati veliko prednost učinkovitemu upravljanju porabe EU; nadalje ugotavlja, da je zlasti pomembno, da dodeljevanje sredstev temelji na objektivnih merilih in stalnem vrednotenju njihove uspešnosti; ocenjuje, da naj se zato spodbuja tesno in uspešno javno-zasebno partnerstvo;
Notes that high priority should be given to effective management of EU spending; notes, further, that it is particularly important that allocations of funds are based on objective criteria and on a continuous evaluation of their performance; considers that strong and efficient Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) should be fostered in this respect;
18. ugotavlja, da države članice v nacionalnih proračunih upoštevajo velik delež ciljev Unije; vztraja, da so tako uporabljena sredstva registrirajo in objavijo v vsaki državi članici, da se tako lažje izmerijo prizadevanja vsake države in bolje ocenijo zneski, ki jih je treba predvideti v proračunu EU na področjih, kjer je treba prizadevanja držav članic spodbuditi oziroma dopolniti;
Notes that a large proportion of the Union’s objectives have been taken into account by the Member States in their national budgets; insists that the appropriations thus mobilised be recorded and published in each Member State to make it easier to gauge the effort made by each one and assess the amounts for which provision needs to be made in the EU budget in fields where Member States’ efforts need to be encouraged or complemented;
Posebna opažanja
Specific observations