natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pri pripravi poročila za drugo obravnavo se je poročevalec sestal z vsemi predstavniki zainteresiranih strani, zlasti s predstavniki Evropske konfederacije sindikatov in članov Eurociett et Uni-Europa, predstavnikov evropskih podjetij za začasno delo.
In preparing the second reading report, your rapporteur met representatives of all the interested parties, and in particular of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) as well as members of Eurociett and Uni-Europa, which represent temporary employment agencies at European level.
Evropska konfederacija sindikatov je skupno stališče Sveta ocenila kot pozitivno.
ETUC gave your rapporteur a positive assessment of the Council’s common position.
Meni, da je ta sporazum odločilen, zlasti ker spoštuje in krepi načelo enakopravnega obravnavanja ter načelo, po katerem bodo izjeme odobrene le na podlagi kolektivnih dogovorov.
In its view, this agreement is decisive, particularly since it respects and enhances the principle of equal treatment and the principle that derogations should be possible only via collective agreements.
Mnenje o tem je sicer izrazila že v izjavi za tisk 10. junija 2008.
It also expressed its opinion on this matter in its press release of 10 June 2008.
Zato je torej treba nujno sprejeti zakonodajo Skupnosti, ki bo zaščitila začasne delavce v Evropi.
There is therefore an urgent need to adopt Community legislation to protect temporary agency workers in Europe.
Poročevalec meni, da lahko Parlament, ki že šest let podpira to direktivo, Svet pa je sedaj povzel njegove predloge za izboljšanje prvotnega predloga, to direktivo za zaščito delavcev nemudoma sprejme z odobritvijo poročila brez novih predlogov sprememb v drugi obravnavi.
In your rapporteur's view, the European Parliament – which has been speaking out in favour of this directive for six years and is now seeing its suggestions for improvements to the initial proposal taken over by the Council – is in a position to bring about the immediate adoption of this worker protection legislation by approving the report without amendment at second reading.
Zato poročevalec priporoča hitro sprejetje brez vložitve dodatnih predlogov sprememb, da bi se ta predlog direktive uzakonil.
Your rapporteur therefore recommends rapid adoption of the report without amendment, to enable this proposal for a directive to become law.
Travail intérimaire: cadre protecteur pour les travailleurs, relations avec l’entreprise de travail
Protection for temporary workers and the relationship between the agency and the worker
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi memoranduma o sodelovanju med Mednarodno organizacijo civilnega letalstva in Evropsko skupnostjo na področju revizij/inšpekcijskih pregledov varnosti in sorodnih zadev
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Memorandum of Cooperation between the International Civil Aviation Organization and the European Community regarding security audits/inspections and related matters
o predlogu za sklep Sveta o sklenitvi memoranduma o sodelovanju med Mednarodno organizacijo civilnega letalstva in Evropsko skupnostjo na področju revizij/inšpekcijskih pregledov varnosti in sorodnih zadev
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Memorandum of Cooperation between the International Civil Aviation Organization and the European Community regarding security audits/inspections and related matters
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2008)0335 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2008)0335 ),
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0320/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0320/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0374/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0374/2008 ),
Mednarodna organizacija civilnega letalstva (ICAO) od leta 2002 v vseh svojih državah pogodbenicah, tudi državah članicah ES, izvaja revizije varnosti, da bi spremljala uporabo Priloge 17 k Čikaški konvenciji.
Since 2002, ICAO conducts security audits in all its Contracting States, including the EC Member States, in order to monitor the application of Annex 17 to the Chicago Convention.
Komisija od leta 2004 na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002 izvaja inšpekcijske preglede varnosti, da bi spremljala, kako države članice uporabljajo to uredbo.
Since 2004, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002, the Commission conducts security inspections in order to monitor the application by Member States of this Regulation.
Priloga 17 in Uredba (ES) št. 2320/2002 vsebujeta pretežno podobne standarde.
Annex 17 and Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 contain, to a large extent, similar standards.
Države članice se zato še vedno srečujejo z dvema sistemoma spremljanja skladnosti, ki imata enak cilj in – v glavnem – enako področje uporabe.
As a consequence, Member States are to date confronted with two compliance monitoring systems with the same objective and – broadly – the same scope.
Tako države članice kot ICAO bi lahko bolje izkoristile omejena sredstva, če bi se precej zmanjšalo število revizij, ki jih ICAO izvaja v Skupnosti.
Both Member States and ICAO could make better use of limited resources if the ICAO audits in the Community would be significantly reduced.
Zato je Svet 30. novembra 2007 sprejel priporočilo Komisije „naj Komisijo pooblasti, da začne pogajanja glede sporazuma o revizijah/inšpekcijskih pregledih varnosti letalstva in sorodnih zadevah med Evropsko skupnostjo in Mednarodno organizacijo civilnega letalstva (ICAO)“.
To that end, on 30 November 2007, the Council adopted the Commission recommendation "to authorise the Commission to open negotiations on an agreement regarding aviation security audits/inspections and related matters between the European Community and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)".
Pogajanja z ICAO so potekala 25. januarja 2008, na njihovi podlagi pa je bil sestavljen osnutek memoranduma o sodelovanju med ICAO in Evropsko skupnostjo na področju revizij/inšpekcijskih pregledov varnosti in sorodnih zadev.
The negotiations with ICAO took place on 25 January 2008, and resulted in a draft Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) between ICAO and the European Community regarding security audits/ inspections and related matters.
V skladu s cilji politike Skupnosti o civilnem letalstvu bo memorandum o sodelovanju utrdil odnos med Skupnostjo in ICAO ter omogočil boljšo uporabo omejenih sredstev držav članic na področju spremljanja skladnosti.
In accordance with the aims of the Community civil aviation policy, the MoC will strengthen the relationship between the Community and ICAO, and allow for a better use of limited resources of Member States in the field of compliance monitoring.
Cilj osnutka memoranduma o sodelovanju je bistveno zmanjšanje števila posameznih revizij, ki jih ICAO izvaja v državah članicah.
The draft MoC aims to significantly reduce individual audits by ICAO in Member States.
ICAO bo zato ocenila sistem inšpekcijskih pregledov Evropske komisije na področju varnosti letalstva, npr. poročila o inšpekcijskih pregledih ustreznih nacionalnih organov, skupaj s podatki iz zadevne države članice, metodologijo inšpekcijskih pregledov in revizijami nadaljnjega spremljanja.
To that end, ICAO will assess the European Commission aviation security inspection system, e.g. the reports of the inspections of the national appropriate authorities together with the data received from the Member State concerned, the inspection methodology and the follow up audits.
Da bi bilo zagotovljeno ustrezno ravnanje s tajnimi podatki EU, je ICAO zavezana upoštevanju Sklepa Komisije 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom, z dne 29. novembra 2001 o spremembah njenega Poslovnika.
In order to ensure the appropriate handling of EU classified information, ICAO is bound to comply with Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom, of 29 November 2001 amending its internal Rules of Procedure.
Komisija je pooblaščena, da na mestu samem preveri, katere varnostne ukrepe izvaja ICAO.
The Commission is authorised to verify in situ which protection measures have been put in place by ICAO.
Memorandum, ki ga je v pogajanjih dosegla Komisija, je treba podpisati in začasno uporabljati.
The Memorandum negotiated by the Commission should be signed and provisionally applied.
Predlagani Sklep Sveta pooblašča predsednika Sveta, da določi pristojno osebo, ki obvesti ICAO o dokončanju potrebnih notranjih postopkov, da memorandum začne veljati.
The proposed Council Decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person empowered to notify ICAO that the internal procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Memorandum have been completed.
Parlament ima pravico dati mnenje o tem memorandumu po postopku posvetovanja v skladu s sedmim odstavkom člena 83 „Mednarodni sporazumi“, ki se glasi:
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Memorandum under the consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph 7, which reads as follows:
Na osnovi zapisanega poročevalec predlaga, da Odbor za promet in turizem poda pozitivno mnenje o sklenitvi tega memoranduma.
On the basis of the above your rapporteur suggests that the TRAN committee should give a favourable opinion on the conclusion of this Memorandum.
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o letaliških pristojbinah
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on airport charges
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (8332/2/2008 – C6-0259/2008 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (8332/2/2008 – C6‑0259/2008 )
Sprejeta besedila, 15.1.2008, P6_TA(2008)0004 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0820 ),
Texts Adopted, 15.1.2008, P6_TA(2008)0004 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0820 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0375/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0375/2008 ),
(2) Treba je vzpostaviti skupen okvir, ki bo urejal bistvene značilnosti letaliških pristojbin in način njihovega določanja, saj se lahko zgodi, da brez takšnega okvira ni mogoče izpolniti osnovnih zahtev v odnosu med upravnimi organi letališča in uporabniki letališča.
(2) It is necessary to establish a common framework regulating the essential features of airport charges and the way they are set, as in the absence of such a framework, basic requirements in the relationship between airport managing bodies and airport users may not be met.
Ta okvir ne bi smel posegati v možnost države članice, da določi obseg v katerem se prihodki iz gospodarskih dejavnosti letališča upoštevajo pri določanju letaliških pristojbin.
Such a framework should be without prejudice to the possibility for a Member State to determine the extent to which revenues from an airport's commercial activities may be taken into account in establishing airport charges.
Ta okvir ne bi smel posegati v možnost države članice, da določi, ali in v kakšnem obsegu se prihodki iz gospodarskih dejavnosti letališča upoštevajo pri določanju letaliških pristojbin.
Such a framework should be without prejudice to the possibility for a Member State to determine if and to what extent revenues from an airport's commercial activities may be taken into account in establishing airport charges.
Pojasnjuje, da gre za prostovoljen ukrep.
Makes clear that this action is discretionary.
(3) Ta direktiva bi se morala uporabljati za letališča v Skupnosti, ki presegajo najmanjšo velikost, saj pri upravljanju in financiranju manjših letališč okvir Skupnosti ni potreben, in za letališča z največjim potniškim prometom v vsaki državi članici.
(3) This Directive should apply to airports located in the Community that are above a minimum size as the management and the funding of small airports do not call for the application of a Community framework , and to the airport with the highest passenger movement in each Member State .
(3) Ta direktiva bi se morala uporabljati za letališča v Skupnosti, ki presegajo najmanjšo velikost, saj pri upravljanju in financiranju malih letališč okvir Skupnosti ni potreben.
(3) This Directive should apply to airports located in the Community that are above a minimum size , as the management and the funding of small airports do not call for the application of a Community framework.
Upoštevati v povezavi s spodnjim predlogom spremembe 3.
To be read in conjunction with amendment 3 below.
(3a) Poleg tega v državah članicah, v katerih nobeno letališče ne dosega najmanjše velikosti za uporabo te direktive, ima letališče z največjim potniškim prometom tako privile giran položaj kot vstopna točka v to državo članico, da je za to letališče treba uporabiti določbe te direktive, da se zagotovi spoštovanje nekaterih temeljih načel pri odnosih med upravnim organom in uporabniki letališča, zlasti kar zadeva preglednost pristojbin in nediskriminacije med uporabniki letališča.
(3a) In addition, in a Member State where no airport reaches the minimum size for the application of this Directive, the airport with the highest passenger movements enjoys such a privileged position as a point of entry to that Member State that it is necessary to apply the provisions of this Directive to that airport in order to guarantee the respect of certain basic principles in the relationship between the airport managing body and the airport users, in particular with regard to transparency of charges and non-discrimination among airport users.
Škodljivo za učinkovanje direktive bi bilo, če največje letališče v državi članici ne bi bilo vključeno v področje njene uporabe.
It would be detrimental to the operation of the Directive if the largest airport in a Member State was not included in it scope.
(5) Zaradi porazdelitve prometa bi morale države članice imeti možnost dovoliti, da upravni organ letališč istega mesta ali somestja obračunavajo isto stopnjo letaliških pristojbin .
(5) For reasons of traffic distribution Member States should be able to allow an airport managing body for airports serving the same city or conurbation to apply the same level of airport charges .
Ekonomski transferji med temi letališči bi morali biti v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti.
Economic transfers between these airports should comply with relevant Community law.
(5) Zaradi porazdelitve prometa bi morale države članice imeti možnost dovoliti, da upravni organ letališč istega mesta ali somestja uporabijo skupen in pregleden sistem obračunavanja pristojbin .
(5) For reasons of traffic distribution Member States should be able to allow an airport managing body for airports serving the same city or conurbation to apply a common and transparent charging system .
Ni treba obračunavati iste višine pristojbin, vendar mora biti sistem izračunavanja skupen in pregleden.
The same level of charges need not be applied but the charging system must be common and transparent.
Ista višina pristojbin ne bi bila primerna, saj ne bi bila povezana s stroški ali z ravnjo nudenih storitev ali objektov, naprav in sredstev, ki so na voljo.
The same level of charges would not be appropriate as it would not be cost related or related to the level of service or facilities provided.
(10) Letališke pristojbine bi morale biti nediskriminatorne.
(10) Airport charges should be non‑discriminatory.
Uvesti bi bilo treba obvezen postopek, po katerem bi potekalo redno posvetovanje med upravnimi organi letališča in uporabniki letališča, z možnostjo, da se lahko katera koli stran obrne na neodvisno nadzorno telo , če uporabniki letališča spodbijajo odločitev o letaliških pristojbinah ali spremembi sistema obračunavanja pristojbin.
A compulsory procedure for regular consultation between airport managing bodies and airport users should be put in place with the possibility for either party to have recourse to an independent supervisory body whenever a decision on airport charges or the modification of the charging system is contested by airport users.
Uvesti bi bilo treba obvezen postopek, po katerem bi potekalo redno posvetovanje med upravnimi organi letališča in uporabniki letališča, z možnostjo, da se lahko katera koli stran obrne na neodvisen nadzorni urad , če uporabniki letališča spodbijajo odločitev o letaliških pristojbinah ali spremembi sistema obračunavanja pristojbin.
A compulsory procedure for regular consultation between airport managing bodies and airport users should be put in place with the possibility for either party to have recourse to an independent supervisory authority whenever a decision on airport charges or the modification of the charging system is contested by airport users.
"Urad" natančneje odraža dodeljene naloge in pristojnosti.
"Authority" more accurately reflects the tasks and responsibilities involved.
(11) Da bi zagotovili nepristranskost odločitev ter ustrezno in učinkovito uporabo te direktive, bi bilo treba v vsaki državi članici ustanoviti neodvisno nadzorno telo .
(11) In order to ensure impartial decisions and the proper and effective application of this Directive, an independent supervisory body should be established in every Member State.
To telo bi moralo imeti za izvajanje svojih nalog na voljo vse potrebne vire, kar zadeva zaposlovanje, strokovno znanje in izkušnje ter finančna sredstva.
The body should be in possession of all the necessary resources in terms of staffing, expertise, and financial means for the performance of its tasks.
(11) Da bi zagotovili nepristranskost odločitev ter ustrezno in učinkovito uporabo te direktive, bi bilo treba v vsaki državi članici ustanoviti neodvisen nadzorni urad .
(11) In order to ensure impartial decisions and the proper and effective application of this Directive, an independent supervisory authority should be established in every Member State.
Ta urad bi moral imeti za izvajanje svojih nalog na voljo vse potrebne vire, kar zadeva zaposlovanje, strokovno znanje in izkušnje ter finančna sredstva.
The authority should be in possession of all the necessary resources in terms of staffing, expertise, and financial means for the performance of its tasks.
(14a) Države članice imajo različne sisteme v zvezi z vnaprejšnjim financiranjem letaliških naložb.
(14a) Different systems exist in different Member States concerning the pre-financing of airport investments.
V državah članicah, kjer pride do vnaprejšnjega financiranja, bi se države članice ali letališča morali zgledovati po politiki Mednarodne organizacije za civilno letalstvo ter/ali vzpostaviti svoja varovala.
In Member States where pre-financing occurs, Member States or airports should refer to ICAO policies and/or establish their own safeguards.
Ko pride do vnaprejšnjega financiranja, morajo biti vzpostavljena jasna varovala.
There must be clear safeguards on place where pre-financing occurs.
Države članice lahko upravnemu organu omrežja letališč dovolijo, da za omrežje letališč določi skupen in pregleden sistem obračunavanja pristojbin.
Member States may allow the airport managing body of an airport network to introduce a common and transparent airport charging system to cover the airport network.
Države članice lahko upravnemu organu letališča za letališča istega mesta ali somestja dovolijo, da na vseh zadevnih letališčih obračunajo enako stopnjo letališke pristojbine, če vsa letališča v celoti izpolnjujejo zahteve o preglednosti iz člena 6.
Member States may allow an airport managing body for airports serving the same city or conurbation, to apply the same level of airport charges to all the airports concerned, provided that each airport fully complies with the requirements on transparency set out in Article 6.
Skupni sistemi obračunavanja pristojbin
Common charging systems
Države članice lahko potem, ko obvestijo Komisijo, ter v skladu s pravom Skupnosti, upravnemu organu letališča dovolijo, da za letališča istega mesta ali somestja uporabi skupen in pregleden sistem obračunavanja pristojbin, če vsa letališča v celoti izpolnjujejo zahteve v zvezi s preglednostjo iz člena 6.
After having informed the Commission and in accordance with Community law, Member States may allow an airport managing body to apply a common and transparent charging system at airports serving the same city or conurbation, provided that each airport fully complies with the requirements on transparency set out in Article 6.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se sistem obračunavanja letaliških pristojbin ali višine letaliških pristojbin, če je le mogoče, spremeni po dogovoru med upravnim organom letališča in uporabniki letališča.
Member States shall ensure that, wherever possible, changes to the system or the level of airport charges are made in agreement between the airport managing body and the airport users.
Zato upravni organ letališča predloži uporabnikom letališča vsak predlog za spremembo sistema obračunavanja ali višine letaliških pristojbin najpozneje štiri mesece pred začetkom veljavnosti, skupaj z razlogi za predlagane spremembe, razen v primeru izrednih okoliščin, ki pa jih mora uporabnikom letališča opravičiti in v tem primeru obdobje ne sme biti krajše od dveh mesecev.
To that end, the airport managing body shall submit any proposal to modify the system or the level of airport charges to the airport users no later than four months before they enter into force, together with the reasons for the proposed changes, unless there are exceptional circumstances which need to be justified to airport users , in which case, this period shall not be less than two months .
Upravni organ letališča se o predlaganih spremembah posvetuje z uporabniki letališča in pri dokončni odločitvi upošteva njihova stališča.
The airport managing body shall hold consultations on the proposed changes with the airport users and take their views into account before a decision is taken.
Upravni organ letališča objavi svojo odločitev ali priporočilo v razumnem roku pred začetkom njene veljavnosti.
The airport managing body shall publish its decision or recommendation within reasonable time before it enters into force.
Če med upravnim organom letališča in uporabniki letališča ne pride do sporazuma o predlaganih spremembah, upravni organ letališča svojo odločitev utemelji glede na stališče uporabnikov letališča.
The airport managing body shall justify its decision with regard to the views of the airport users in the event that no agreement on the proposed changes is reached between the airport managing body and the airport users.
Zato upravni organ letališča predloži uporabnikom letališča vsak predlog za spremembo sistema obračunavanja ali višine letaliških pristojbin najpozneje štiri mesece pred začetkom veljavnosti, skupaj z razlogi za predlagane spremembe, razen v primeru izrednih okoliščin, ki pa jih mora uporabnikom letališča opravičiti.
To that end, the airport managing body shall submit any proposal to modify the system or the level of airport charges to the airport users no later than four months before they enter into force, together with the reasons for the proposed changes, unless there are exceptional circumstances which need to be justified to airport users.
Upravni organ letališča navadno objavi svojo odločitev ali priporočilo najkasneje dva meseca pred začetkom njene veljavnosti.
The airport managing body shall normally publish its decision or recommendation no later than two months before its entry into force.
V času med predložitvijo predlaganih pristojbin ter začetkom njihove veljavnosti je potrebna prilagodljivost v primeru izrednih okoliščin.
There is a need for flexibility in the time period required between submission of proposed charges and their coming into effect where exceptional circumstances arise.
Vendar pa bi morale biti odločitve navadno objavljene dva meseca pred začetkom njihove veljavnosti.
However, decisions should normally be published two months before they enter into force.