natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kadar država članica obravnava izdajo dovoljenja za prebivanje tujcu, za katerega je bil razpisan ukrep zavrnitve vstopa, se najprej posvetuje z državo članico , ki je ukrep razpisala, in upošteva njene interese; dovoljenje za prebivanje se izda samo iz tehtnih razlogov, zlasti humanitarnih ali takih, ki izhajajo iz mednarodnih obveznosti.
Where a Member State considers issuing a residence permit to an alien for whom an alert has been issued for the purposes of refusing entry, it shall first consult the Member State issuing the alert and shall take account of its interests; the residence permit shall be issued for substantive reasons only, notably on humanitarian grounds or by reason of international commitments.
Če se dovoljenje za prebivanje izda, država članica , ki je razpisala ukrep, ukrep prekliče, vendar lahko tega tujca uvrsti na nacionalni seznam razpisanih ukrepov.“.
If a residence permit is issued, the Member State issuing the alert shall withdraw the alert but may put the alien concerned on its national list of alerts . ". ;
(5) V členu 25 se vstavi naslednji odstavek 1a:
(5) In Article 25, the following paragraph 1a is inserted:
Pred razpisom ukrepa zavrnitve vstopa v skladu s členom 96, pristojni organi držav članic preverijo nacionalne evidence izdanih vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje ali dovoljenj za prebivanje.“.
Prior to issuing an alert for the purposes of refusing entry within the meaning of Article 96, the responsible authorities of the Member States shall check their national records of long stay visas or residence permits issued."
(6) V členu 25 se doda odstavek 3:
(6) In Article 25, paragraph 3 is added:
Odstavka 1 in 2 se uporabljata tudi za vizume za dolgoročno prebivanje.“
Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply also in case of long-stay visas."
Uredba (ES) št. 562/2006 se spremeni, kakor sledi:
Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 is amended as follows:
(1) Člen 5(1)(b) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(1) Article 5, paragraph 1 point (b), is replaced by the following:
„(b) posedovati morajo veljaven vizum, če se to zahteva v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 539/2001 o seznamu tretjih držav, katerih državljani morajo pri prehodu zunanjih meja imeti vizume, in držav, katerih državljani so oproščeni te zahteve, razen če imajo veljavno dovoljenje za prebivanje ali veljaven vizum za dolgoročno prebivanje.“
"(b) they are in possession of a valid visa, if required pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, except where they hold a valid residence permit or a valid long-stay visa."
(2) Člen 5(4)(a) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(2) Article 5, paragraph 4 point (a), is replaced by the following:
„(a) državljanom tretjih držav, ki ne izpolnjujejo vseh pogojev iz odstavka 1, imajo pa dovoljenje za prebivanje, vizum za dolgoročno bivanje ali vizum za ponovni vstop, ki ga je izdala ena od držav članic ali, kjer se to zahteva, dovoljenje za prebivanje ali vizum za dolgoročno bivanje in vizum za ponovni vstop, se dovoli vstop na ozemlja drugih držav članic za namene tranzita, zato da lahko vstopijo na ozemlje države članice, ki je izdala dovoljenje za prebivanje, vizum za dolgoročno prebivanje ali vizum za ponovni vstop, razen če so njihova imena na nacionalnem seznamu razpisanih ukrepov držav članic, katerih zunanje meje želijo prestopiti, in razpisan ukrep spremljajo navodila za zavrnitev vstopa ali tranzita;“.
" (a) third-country nationals who do not fulfil all the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 but hold a residence permit , a long-stay visa or a re-entry visa issued by one of the Member States or, where required, a residence permit or a long-stay visa and a re-entry visa , shall be authorised to enter the territories of the other Member States for transit purposes so that they may reach the territory of the Member State which issued the residence permit, long-stay visa or re-entry visa, unless their names are on the national list of alerts of the Member State whose external borders they are seeking to cross and the alert is accompanied by instructions to refuse entry or transit;" .
Ta uredba ne vpliva na obveznost držav članic, da izdajajo dovoljenja za prebivanje državljanom tretjih držav, kakor je določeno v drugih instrumentih prava Unije .
This Regulation shall not affect the obligation for Member States to issue residence permits to third-country nationals as provided by other instruments of the Union .
Komisija in države članice v celoti in pravilno obvestijo osebe, ki jih to zadeva, o določbah te uredbe.
The Commission and the Member States shall inform the persons concerned fully and correctly of the provisions of this Regulation.
Najkasneje do 5. aprila 2012 Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o izvajanju te uredbe.
Not later than 5 April 2012, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of this Regulation.
Poročilu po potrebi priloži predloge za spremembo te uredbe.
If necessary, the report shall be accompanied by proposals to modify this Regulation.
Ta uredba začne veljati 5. aprila 2010 in se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 April 2010 and should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v državah članicah v skladu s Pogodbami.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties .
OSNUTEK DEKLARACIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA
DRAFT DECLARATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
„Svet in Evropski parlament priznavata pomembnost izčrpnega in doslednega sklopa predpisov, ki na ravni Evropske unije nudijo visoko stopnjo varstva osebnih podatkov v okviru druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II).
"The Council and the European Parliament recognise the importance of the existence of a comprehensive and coherent set of rules, at the level of the European Union, providing for a high level of protection of personal data in the framework of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II).
Evropski parlament in Svet pozivata Komisijo naj, če bi nastale nadaljnje znatne zamude pri izvrševanju SIS II, ki bi izvrševanje prestavile po letu 2012, predstavi zakonodajne predloge, ki bi bili potrebni za spremembo ustreznih določb Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma, da se zagotovi raven varstva osebnih podatkov, vnesenih v schengenski informacijski sistem, ki bi bila enakovredna standardom, določenim v SIS II.“
If there would be further, important delays in implementing the SIS II, that will go beyond 2012, the European Parliament and the Council invite the Commission to present the necessary legislative proposals amending the relevant provisions of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement in order to ensure a level of protection of the personal data entered into the Schengen Information System equivalent to the standards established for SIS II."
Schengenska konvencija določa, da lahko imetniki vizuma za dolgoročno prebivanje (vizum D):
The Schengen Convention stipulates that holders of a long-stay visa ('D visa') may only:
- se zadržujejo na ozemlju države članice, ki je izdala vizum;
- stay in the territory of the Member State which issued the visa;
- potujejo prek ozemelj drugih držav članic, da pridejo do te države članice, ne smejo pa potovati v druge države članice ali preko njihovih ozemelj, ko se vračajo v svojo državo izvora.
- transit through the territories of other Member States in order to reach that State, and may not travel to the other Member States or transit through the other Member States when returning to their country of origin.
Večina držav članice je uvedla postopek, s katerim se po vstopu v državo takšen vizum spremeni v dovoljenje za prebivanje, kar državljanom tretjih držav, ki imajo dovoljenje za prebivanje in veljavno potovalno listino, omogoča, da svobodno potujejo v druge države članice za obdobje treh mesecev v vsakem šestmesečnem obdobju.
Most Member States have introduced the procedure for converting this type of visa into a residence permit following entry into the country, which allows a third-country national holding such residence permit and a valid travel document to travel freely for up to three months in any half year within the territories of the other Member States.
V praksi je pri spreminjanju teh vizumov prišlo do znatnih zamud, v nekaterih primerih pa sploh niso bili spremenjeni.
However, in practice, there have been considerable delays in the conversion of such visas and, in some cases, they have not been converted at all.
To v skladu s schengensko konvencijo onemogoča tem osebam, da potujejo v druge države članice ali jih prečkajo, ko se vračajo v države izvora.
Under the Schengen Convention, this makes it impossible for such persons to travel to other Member States or to transit through them when returning to their countries of origin.
Vseeno v praksi države članice še vedno ne izdajajo vizumov D+C ali jih izdajajo v zelo majhnem številu, zaradi naslednjih razlogov:
Nevertheless, in practice most Member States still do not issue D+C visas or only issue very small numbers, the reasons being that:
- konzularnimi uradniki nimajo zadostnega znanja o tej zadevi;
- there is a lack of knowledge on the subject among consular officials;
- prosilci niso seznanjeni s to možnostjo;
- applicants are not informed of this possibility;
- nacionalni programi za registracijo in obdelavo vizumov ne omogočajo obravnavanja prošenj za tovrstne vizume ali njihovo izdajanje.
- national visa registration and processing programmes do not allow for the possibility of considering applications or issuing such visas.
Če je vizum izdan in na koncu trimesečnega obdobja ni nadomeščen z dovoljenjem za prebivanje, imetniku ni več dovoljeno potovati v drugo državo članico.
Where a visa is issued and is not replaced by a residence permit by the end of the three-month period, the holder is no longer authorised to travel to another Member States.
Da bi bilo to mogoče, morajo te osebe zaprositi za ločeni schengenski vizum za kratkoročno prebivanje.
To do so, such persons are required to apply for a separate Schengen short-stay visa.
Nekatere države članice pa zavračajo izdajo tovrstnih vizumov, saj so prosilci osebe, ki so že tri prebile na schengenskem območju na podlagi vizuma D+C.
However, some Member States refuse to issue such visas as such applicants have already stayed in the Schengen area for three months, on the basis of a D+C visa.
Zakonik o schengenskih mejah in Vizumski zakonik Skupnosti
Schengen Borders Code and Community Code on Visas
V zvezi s tema dvema instrumentoma je treba upoštevati več vprašanj:
A number of issues need to be considered in connection with these instruments:
- predlog uredbe o Vizumskem zakoniku Skupnosti določa odpravo vizuma D+C, da se zadeve poenostavijo, in od držav članic zahteva pospešitev izdajanja dovoljenja za prebivanje državljanom tretjih držav;
- The proposal for a Regulation establishing the Community Code on Visas provides for the abolition of the D+C visa in order to simplify matters and requires Member States to speed up the issuance of residence permits to third-country nationals.
- člen 5(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) prav tako omogoča državljanom tretjih držav z veljavnim dovoljenjem za prebivanje, da prečkajo zunanje meje druge države članice brez vizuma, in sicer za prebivanje, ki ni daljše od treh mesecev.
- Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 (Schengen Borders Code) also provides for the possibility for third-country nationals in possession of a valid residence permit to cross the external borders of another Member State without a visa for stays not exceeding three months.
Področje uporabe
Scope of the proposals
Namen predlogov je olajšati državljanom tretjih držav, ki zakonito prebivajo v državi članici, gibanje na schengenskem območju, na podlagi vizuma za dolgoročno prebivanje D, ki ga izda država članica.
The proposals seek to make it easier for third-country nationals legally residing in a Member State to move in the Schengen area on the basis of a D long-stay visa issued by that Member State.
To naj bi rešilo za situacije, ko države članice iz različnih razlogov ne morejo pravočasno izdati dovoljenj za prebivanje državljanom tretjih držav, ki prebivajo na njihovem ozemlju, in sicer tako, da se razširi obstoječe načelo enakovrednosti med dovoljenjem za prebivanje in vizumom za kratkoročno prebivanje (vizum C), še na vizume za dolgoročno prebivanje (vizum D).
They are intended to provide a response to situations where Member States are unable, for various reasons, to issue residence permits in time to third-country nationals residing in their territory, by extending the existing principle of equivalence between a residence permit and short-stay C visas to long-stay D visas.
Vizum za dolgoročno prebivanje bo tako imel enak učinek kot dovoljenje za prebivanje, kar zadeva gibanje na schengenskem območju.
A long-stay visa will thus have the same effects as a residence permit as regards circulation in the Schengen area.
To bo vsakomur, ki ima listino, ki dokazuje, da zakonito prebiva v državi članici, omogočilo, da se prosto giblje v schengenskem območju, in sicer za obdobje treh mesecev v vsakem šestmesečnem obdobju.
This will make it possible for anyone in possession of a document showing that he is legally resident in a Member State to move freely in the Schengen area for short periods of no more than three months in any half year.
Države članice bodo še vedno morale izdajati dovoljenja za prebivanje v skladu z obveznostmi iz številnih direktiv, ki zadevajo sprejem nekaterih kategorij državljanov tretjih držav.
Member States will still be required to issue residence permits, in keeping with the obligations laid down by a number of directives relating to the admission of certain categories of third-country nationals.
Treba se je zavedati, da gre pri schengenskem območju za svobodo gibanja.
It should be borne in mind that Schengen is about freedom of movement.
Vsakomur, ki ima listino, ki dokazuje, da zakonito prebiva v državi članici, bi moralo biti omogočeno, da prosto potuje na tem območju, ki nima notranjih meja.
Anyone in possession of a document showing that they are legally resident in a Member State should be able to travel freely in that area, which is free of internal borders.
Idealna rešitev bi bila, da bi države članice izpolnjevale obveznost izdaje dovoljenja za prebivanje državljanom tretjih držav, ki imajo ta vizum.
The ideal solution would be for Member States to meet their obligation to grant a residence permit to third-country nationals holding this visa.
Vendar se to v večini držav članic ne dogaja.
However, in practice this is not what happens in most Member States.
Dejstvo, da študent, ki mu je izdan vizum za študij v Belgiji (ki ne spada v področje uporabe Direktive št. 2004/114/ES) ne more iti v specializirano knjižnico na Nizozemsko, da tam pridobi podatke za pisanje naloge, ali v Barcelono za vikend, je enostavno nesprejemljivo.
The fact that a student who is granted a visa to attend a course in Belgium (not falling within the scope of Directive No 2004/114/EC) cannot travel to a specialised library in the Netherlands to obtain information for the purposes of writing his thesis or to Barcelona for a weekend visit is simply unacceptable.
To je primer, do kakšnih nesmiselnih situacij lahko pride.
This is an example of how absurd situations can arise.
Glede na to, da naj bi Vizumski zakonik Skupnosti pričel veljati aprila 2010, je treba nujno najti rešitev za to težavo.
Given that the Community Code on Visas is due to enter into force in April 2010, a solution needs to be found to this problem as a matter of urgency.
Predlog Komisije se zdi razumen, čeprav bodo potrebne nekatere spremembe, da se reši težava v zvezi z vizumi za dolgoročno prebivanje, ne da bi se ogrozila ali zmanjšala raven varnosti v schengenskem območju, vendar z namenom, da se konča ta kršitev temeljnih pravic, kakor dokazujejo tisoči prejetih pritožb.
The Commission's proposals seem reasonable, although some amendments will be necessary to remedy the problem relating to long-stay visas without calling into question or reducing security levels in the Schengen area, but with a view to putting an end to this violation of fundamental rights, as reflected by the thousands of complaints that have been received.
Z zahtevo za poizvedbo v SIS pri obravnavanju vlog za vizume za dolgoročno prebivanje (vizume D) se bo zagotovil enak nadzor nad prosilci za vizum za dolgoročno prebivanje, kot se že zdaj uporablja za državljane tretjih držav, ki so imetniki dovoljenja za prebivanje.
The requirement to consult the SIS when processing long-stay (D) visa applications will ensure the same control over long-stay visa applicants as the existing one applicable to third-country nationals holding a residence permit.
To odpravi zadržek, da se povečuje nevarnost.
This addresses the concern that insecurity is on the increase.
Poleg tega so številne države članice v skladu z veljavno ureditvijo državljanom tretjih držav izdale vizume za dolgoročno bivanje (vizume D) in nato dovoljenja za prebivanje, in sicer ne da bi opravile poizvedbo v SIS (zlasti določba člena 96 o zavrnitvi vstopa).
Moreover, a number of Member States have, under the present arrangements, issued D long-stay visas, and subsequently residence permits, to third-country nationals without prior consultation of the SIS (in particular the provisions of Article 96 on refusing entry).
Ta praksa ne ogroža le varnosti znotraj schengenskega območja, temveč povzroča tudi znatne težave na zunanjih mejah, ko se ime osebe z veljavnim vizumom D pojavi na seznamih SIS.
This tendency not only poses a threat to security in the Schengen area, but also creates considerable difficulties at the external borders, when the names of persons with valid D visas appear on SIS lists.
To povzroča zaplete in nepotrebne težave za osebe same in za uradnike na meji, ki morajo z dolgotrajnimi postopki preveriti, ali so bili vizumi ponarejeni, ali so podatki iz SIS napačni in jih je treba izbrisati, ali enostavno zadevni vizum nikoli ne bi smel biti izdan.
This gives rise to complications and unnecessary problems for the persons themselves and for border officials, who need to carry out lengthy checks in order to ascertain whether visas have been falsified, the SIS data are inaccurate and should be removed, or the visas in question simply should never have been issued.
Učinek Lizbonske pogodbe
Impact of the Treaty of Lisbon
Dva predloga Komisije, ki sta osnova za to poročilo, sta bila 1. decembra 2009, ko je Lizbonska pogodba pričela veljati, v obravnavi.
The two Commission proposals underlying this report were pending when the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force on 1 December 2009.
Bila sta uvrščena na seznam priloge 4 t.im. sporočila "omnibus" Komisije o posledicah začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja.
They were listed in annex 4 of the so-called "omnibus" Communication by the Commission on "Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing inter-institutional decision-making procedures".
Sporočilo omnibus je določilo novo pravno podlago za predloge v obravnavi, in sicer kakor sledi: pravni podlagi za predlog KOM(2009)91 sta bila člena 62(2)(a) in (3) Pogodbe ES, nova pravna podlaga sta člena 77(2)(b) in (c) PDEU.
The omnibus Communication determined the new legal bases of the pending proposals as follows: For the proposal COM(2009)91, the former legal bases were Article 62 (2) (a) and (3) EC Treaty, and the new legal bases are Article 77 (2) (b) and (c) TFEU.
Pravna podlaga za predlog KOM(2009)90 je bil člen 63(3)(a) Pogodbe ES, nova pravna podlaga je člen 79(2)(a) PDEU.
For the proposal COM(2009)90, the former legal basis was Article 63 (3) (a) EC Treaty, and the new legal basis is Article 79 (2) (a) TFEU.
V skladu z novo pravno podlago se uporablja postopek soodločanja ali redni zakonodajni postopek z glasom kvalificirane večine v Svetu ne le za prvi, temveč za oba predloga Komisije.
Under the new legal bases the co-decision procedure or ordinary legislative procedure, with qualified majority vote in the Council, applies not only to the first, but to both Commission proposals.
Zato je Svet ob podpori Komisije predlagal, da se ta dva postopka združita.
Therefore the Council, supported by the Commission, suggested to merge the two procedures.
Na svojem zasedanju 11. januarja 2010 je Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve soglašal z združitvijo dveh postopkov, pod pogojem, da Odbor za pravne zadeve odobri spremembo pravne podlage, ki jo bo povzročila združitev.
At its meeting of 11 January 2010 the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs agreed to merge the two procedures, provided that the Legal Affairs Committee approves the change in the legal basis triggered by the merger.
Tehnično se združitev opravi z vključitvijo besedila prejšnjega postopka posvetovanja v postopek soodločanja.
Technically, the merger is done by integrating the text of the former consultation procedure in the co-decision procedure.
Poročevalec želi opozoriti na dejstvo, da je so številni nacionalni parlamenti obravnavali predlog Komisije in da sta estonski in portugalski parlament sprejela mnenji
The rapporteur would like to draw attention to the fact that several national Parliaments have considered the Commission proposals and the Estonian and the Portuguese Parliaments have adopted opinions
Mnenji nacionalnih parlamentov sta na voljo v podatkovni bazi IPEX na naslednjih povezavah:
Opinions of the national Parliaments are available in the IPEX database at the following links:
Pripravljavka mnenja: Cecilia Wikström
Rapporteur: Cecilia Wikström
Med najpomembnejšimi dejavniki evropskega povezovanja sta bila odprava notranjih meja in večja zmožnost prostega gibanja med državami članicami.
One of the most important factors in European integration has been the dismantling of our internal borders and the increased ability to travel freely between the Member States.
Zato je nesmiselno, da mnogo imetnikov vizuma za dolgoročno prebivanje danes manj uveljavlja prosto gibanje na schengenskem območju kot imetniki vizuma za kratkoročno prebivanje.
It is therefore paradoxical that many holders of long-stay visas today enjoy less freedom of movement in the Schengen area than holders of short-stay visas.
Do tega protislovja je prišlo zaradi praks držav članic glede spreminjanja vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje v dovoljenja za prebivanje.
The paradox has arisen due to Member States practices concerning the conversion of long-stay visas to residence permits.
Rešitev tega protislovja poskušata zagotoviti dva tesno povezana predloga Komisije, eden v okviru postopka posvetovanja
Two closely related Commission proposals, one under the consultation procedure
Pravna podlaga: člen 63(3)(a) ES. , drugi pa v okviru postopka soodločanja
Legal basis: Article 63(3)(a) EC. and the other under the codecision procedure
Pravna podlaga: člena 62(2)(a) in (3) ES. .
Legal basis: Articles 62(2)(a) and (3) EC. , attempt to provide a solution to this paradox.
Če bosta sprejeta, bosta imetnikom vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje omogočila, da bodo imeli enake možnosti prostega gibanja na schengenskem območju, kot jih imajo imetniki vizumov za kratkoročno prebivanje.
If adopted, they would enable holders of long-stay visas to move freely throughout the Schengen area in an equivalent way to holders of short-stay visas.
Komisija se je s predlagano rešitvijo izognila praktičnim pomanjkljivostim in zamudam v zvezi z izdajo dovoljenj za prebivanje, s katerimi so se v veliko državah članicah soočali imetniki vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje.
The solution proposed by the Commission side-steps the practical disadvantages and delays observed in many Member States by long-stay visa holders concerning the issuing of residence permits.
Ker se prejšnja ureditev
The previous arrangement