natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar pa je Komisija zaradi tržnih neravnotežij, predvidenih za tržni leti 2006/2007 in 2007/2008, tako marca 2006 (1,1 milijona ton) kot marca 2007 (2 milijona ton) uvedla politiko enkratnega preventivnega umika.
However, the anticipated market imbalances during the 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 marketing periods have led the Commission to implement exceptional preventive withdrawal arrangements from March 2006 (1.1 million tonnes) and in March 2007 (2 million tonnes).
Glavni razlog, ki je Komisijo spodbudil k izvedbi omenjenega izrednega ukrepa namesto k izvajanju pravil, predvidenih v členu 19(1) uredbe (ES) št. 318/2006, je sledeči: v skladu z zadevnim ukrepom je delež umika izračunan linearno glede na vso pridelano količino in na osnovi določene kvote ter brez upoštevanja morebitnih poskusov določenih podjetij za prilagoditev svoje proizvodnje.
The basic reason why the Commission implemented the above exceptional measure, rather than the measures provided for in Article 19(1) of Regulation (ΕC) 318/2006 is as follows: under this measure, the percentage withdrawal is applied across the board to all quantities produced on the basis of quotas, without any account being taken of possible attempts to adjust production by certain undertakings.
Zaradi pomanjkljivosti pri mehanizmu umika in hkrati neučinkovitega izvajanja prestrukturiranja je treba mehanizem nujno izboljšati ter prilagoditi potrebam in ciljem skupne ureditve trga sladkorja.
The shortcomings of the withdrawal mechanism referred to above, in conjunction with the ineffective implementation of restructuring make it imperative to improve it and adapt it to the needs and objectives of the CMO.
Predlogi Komisije
The Commission's proposals
Komisija predlaga izpopolnitev načrta Skupnosti za prestrukturiranje in prilagoditev mehanizma umika, da bi tako povečali učinkovitost mehanizmov, ki so začeli veljati z revizijo leta 2006, in zagotovili tržno ravnotežje na ravni, ki je blizu referenčni ceni.
In order to streamline the mechanisms introduced with the 2006 reform and ensure market equilibrium at a level close to the reference price, the Commission proposes that the Community restructuring plan be strengthened and that the withdrawal mechanism be adjusted.
Dodatna sredstva, ki bodo potrebna za izvajanje predlaganih ukrepov, so v skladu z načelom finančne nevtralnosti in izhajajo iz sklada za prestrukturiranje.
The additional resources required to implement the proposed measures would respect the principle of budgetary neutrality and be funded by the restructuring fund.
a) Za shemo za prestrukturiranje (uredba (ES) št. 320/2006) se predlaga:
(a) The restructuring regime (Regulation (ΕC) 320/2006) provides for:
- določitev deleža pomoči za prestrukturiranje v višini 10 %, ki se plača pridelovalcem in podizvajalcem, da se tako prepreči negotovost zaradi sedanje možnosti držav članic, da določijo višji delež;
- the percentage of restructuring aid for growers and machinery contractors to be fixed at 10%, thereby removing the uncertainty resulting from the current possibility that a Member State may decide to set a higher percentage.
- dodelitev dodatnega plačila pridelovalcem in
- the granting of an additional payment to growers;
- uvedba možnosti za tržno leto 2008/2009, da pridelovalci sprožijo postopek prestrukturiranja, tako da neposredno zaprosijo za pomoč za prestrukturiranje, če se odpovejo pravici do dobave podjetjem, s katerimi so imeli v prejšnjem tržnem letu dobavne pogodbe.
- for the 2008/2009 marketing period, growers should be given the opportunity to trigger the restructuring procedure by making a direct application to restructuring aid provided that they renounce their delivery rights in relation to undertakings to which they have been bound by delivery contracts in the previous marketing period.
Države članice morajo zato tem podjetjem ustrezno zmanjšati kvote.
As a consequence, the Member State should reduce the quota of the undertaking concerned accordingly.
Vendar je uporaba predlaganega ukrepa omejena na znižanje kvote, ki se dodeli zadevnemu podjetju, za največ 10 % kvote, države članice pa odobrijo prošnje pridelovalcev za pomoč na podlagi seznama po načelu „kdor prej pride, prej melje“.
The implementation of the proposed measure is however limited to a quota reduction of up to 10% of the quota allocated to the undertaking in question, and Member State's acceptance of 'growers' applications should be based on a first-come-first-serve list.
Spremembe uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006 se morajo začeti uporabljati s tržnim letom 2008/2009.
The amendments to Regulation (EC) No. 320/2006 should start to apply as from the 2008/2009 marketing year.
b) Za shemo umika (uredba (ES) št. 318/2006) se predlaga:
(b) The withdrawal regime (Regulation(EC) No. 318/2006) provides for the following:
- vključitev meril v uredbo Sveta, ki so določena v uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 290/2007 v zvezi z možnim nadaljnjim umikom s trga jeseni leta 2007, in
- the integration in the Council's Regulation of criteria laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No. 290/2007 in respect of possible further withdrawals in autumn 2007;
- razveljavitev določbe, v skladu s katero se tradicionalne potrebe po dobavi za rafinerije v primeru umika zmanjšajo.
- the abolishment of the provision providing for a reduction in the traditional supply needs for refiners in the event of withdrawal from the market.
Te spremembe naj bi se začelo uporabljati s tržnim letom 2007/2008.
Implementation of these amendments should begin with the 2007/2008 marketing year.
Stališče poročevalke
Your rapporteur's position
Poročevalka se strinja z analizo Komisije in ocenjuje, da je nujno potrebno spremeniti uredbi (ES) št. 318/2006 in 320/2006.
Your rapporteur subscribes to the Commission's analysis and considers it indispensable that Regulation (EC) 318/2006 and 320/2006 be amended.
Poleg tega poudarja, da zadevne spremembe ne smejo v nobenem primeru povzročiti nove revizije skupne ureditve trga sladkorja.
She would also stress that this amendment should not under any circumstances involve a further review of the CMO.
Prav nasprotno morajo biti napori usmerjeni v izpopolnitev mehanizmov prestrukturiranja in umika, da bi tako dosegli cilje skupne ureditve trga sladkorja in evropski sektor sladkorja pripravili na posledice skorajšnjega odprtja trga.
It is rather an attempt to strengthen the restructuring and withdrawal mechanisms with a view to achieving its targets and to enable the European sugar sector to prepare itself in view of the forthcoming liberalisation of the sugar market.
V tem okviru vsak napačen korak ali zamuda pri izvajanju sedanje skupne ureditve trga predstavlja grožnjo, da se bo trg Evropske unije ob koncu prehodnega obdobja (2010), ko je sicer predvideno linearno znižanje kvot, soočil s velikim presežkom.
Within this framework, any malfunction or delay in the implementation of the present CMO means that there is a risk that the EU market will have accumulated significant surpluses at the end of the transitional period (2010) when a linear decrease in national quotas is scheduled.
To znižanje bo škodovalo tako konkurenčnosti sektorja kot pridelovalcem in lastnikom strojev, za katere ni predvideno nobeno nadomestilo.
This would be prejudicial both for the competitiveness of the sector and for growers themselves and owners and contractors of machinery for whom there is no provision for compensation.
Poročevalka meni, čeprav se v splošnem strinja z mnenjem Komisije, da je mogoče uvesti določene spremembe za izboljšanje in okrepitev mehanizmov prestrukturiranja in umika s končnim ciljem pomagati vsem prizadetim stranem: pridelovalcem in podizvajalcem, delavcem, ki čutijo posledice sheme, podjetjem in regijam.
While generally endorsing the Commission's position, your rapporteur takes the view that a number of amendments could improve the text, in particular by strengthening reallocation and withdrawal mechanisms with the overall purpose of supporting all those involved: growers, contractors, workers affected by the regime, undertakings and regions.
Poročevalka zato meni, da ključna vprašanja, na katera se mora osredotočiti razprava in v zvezi s katerimi lahko Evropski parlament predlaga spremembe za izboljšanje razmer, zadevajo pravila o:
She therefore considers that the basic issues on which the debate should focus and on which amendments could be tabled by the European Parliament with a view to improving the text are as follows:
Ø višini pomoči za prestrukturiranje: Ali je mogoče glede na višek sredstev iz sklada za prestrukturiranje, ki v prvih dveh letih reforme niso bila uporabljena, predlagati povišanja, ki bi predstavljala dodatno finančno spodbudo za podjetja in nadomestilo za pridelovalce?
Ø the level of restructuring aid: can increases be proposed as a supplementary incentive to undertakings and as compensation for growers, in view of the fact that the restructuring fund has more than enough resources, since in the first two years of the reform no recourse was made to it?
Ø neposrednem dostopu pridelovalcev do sklada za prestrukturiranje: Kakšen bi bil učinek tega ukrepa za ponovno uravnoteženje v odnosu do znižanje kvot, ne da bi pri tem zmotili dejavnosti podjetij na splošno?
Ø direct access by growers to the restructuring fund: how can this measure offset quotas reductions, without disturbing the overall activity of undertakings?
Kako bi ukrep po drugi strani omogočal izhod iz slepe ulice za pridelovalce, ki niso konkurenčni?
Furthermore, how will it provide an outlet for uncompetitive growers?
Ø dodatnem plačilu za pridelovalce: Ali znesek, ki ga predlaga Komisija, zadostuje za oblikovanje finančne spodbude in ustreznega nadomestila za pridelovalce?
Ø additional aid for growers: is the amount proposed by the Commission sufficient to act as an incentive and adequate compensation for growers?
Ø izvajanju linearnega znižanja v letu 2010: Kateri način bi bilo treba uporabiti, da bi se izognili diskriminacijski obravnavi določenih držav članic in podjetij in da ne bi bile uvedene sankcije proti državam članicam ali podjetjem, ki so v prestrukturiranje vložili veliko naporov?
Ø implementation of a linear reduction in 2010: what approach should be adopted so as to avoid cases of discriminatory treatment between Member States or undertakings, or the penalisation of Member States or undertakings which have made significant efforts as part of the restructuring regime?
Ø o mehanizmu preventivnega umika: Ali je njegova uporaba potrebna le do izteka prehodnega obdobja oziroma bi bilo slednje treba podaljšati?
Ø the preventive withdrawal mechanism: is it enough that it operate until the end of the transitional period, or should provision be made for an extension?
Poročevalka želi poudariti, da je treba pri vsaki spremembi upoštevati pravno in tudi finančno razliko med a) sredstvi iz sklada za prestrukturiranje, ki jih je mogoče uporabiti izključno za izvajanje ukrepov v okviru sheme za prestrukturiranje, in b) sredstvi, ki so v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada na voljo za sprejetje tržnih ukrepov in dodelitev pomoči pridelovalcem.
Your rapporteur wishes to stress that any amendments must take into account both the legal and budgetary distinction between: (a) resources of the restructuring fund which may only be allocated to measures within the framework of the restructuring regime, and (b) resources available within the framework of the EAGF for market measures and support for growers.
Nazadnje poročevalka še ocenjuje, da bi bilo s političnega vidika smiselno pripomniti - četudi to ni vključeno v predloge delnih sprememb, predstavljenih v uredbah (ES) št. 318/2006 in 320/2006 - da mora Komisija zagotoviti preživetje in konkurenčnost evropske sladkorne industrije po liberalizaciji uvoza iz držav AKP in manj razvitih držav v tržnem letu 2009/2010.
Finally it would be politically advisable - that even though this does not form part of the proposals for a partial amendment of Regulation (EC) 318/2006 and 329/2006 - to point out the need for the Commission to ensure the viability and competitiveness of the European sugar industry after barriers on imports from ACP countries and LDCs are lifted in October 2009.
Prizadevanja za prestrukturiranje sektorja do leta 2010 nikakor ne smejo biti izničena zaradi nenatančnih ali nepreglednih pogajanj Komisije o režimu, ki bo veljal za uvoz iz držav AKP in manj razvitih držav.
Under no circumstances should attempts to restructure the sector undertaken before 2010 be frustrated by the absence of a clear and transparent negotiating position by the Commission in respect of the regime governing imports from ACP countries and LDCs.
Ozadje predloga
Background of the proposal
Predloga uredb Komisije sta sestavljena iz posodobljenih uredb (ES) št. 318/2006 in (ES) št. 320/2006
The two proposals for regulations proposed by the Commission consist of an update of the two regulations: (EC) No 318/2006 and (EC) No 320/2006
UL L 58, 28.2.2006, str.
OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p.
1. , ki sta bili del obsežne sladkorne reforme iz leta 2005
1. which were part of the big sugar reform of 2005
Mnenje Odbora za proračunski nadzor za Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o skupni ureditvi trgov za sladkor (
Opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control for the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development on the proposal for a Council regulation on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (
2005/0118(CNS) ), Pripravljavec mnenja: Terence Wynn. .
2005/0118(CNS) ), Draftsman: Terence Wynn. .
Že po 18 mesecih se je izkazalo, da ukrepi ne zadostujejo za dosego ciljev reforme do leta 2010 in jih je po mnenju Komisije treba spremeniti.
18 months later the measures have already been shown to be insufficient to achieve the reform goals by 2010 and have to be adapted, according to the Commission.
Zaradi prostovoljnih zmanjšanj proizvajalcev se je količina do zdaj zmanjšala za 2,2 milijona ton, to pa je daleč od 6 milijonov ton, kar je cilj reforme.
The voluntary reductions on the part of producers have so far given a 2.2 million tonne decrease, nowhere near the 6 million tonne objective intended by the reform.
Kljub temu so nekatere države članice uresničile cilje reforme, v nekaterih primerih so se njihove kvote za sladkor celo razpolovile.
However, some Member States have reached the reform targets, in some cases even reducing their sugar quotas by half.
Zato pripravljavec mnenja meni, da se je pri spremembi reforme treba osredotočiti na tiste države članice, v katerih sladkorna reforma leta 2005 ni bila uspešna.
Therefore, your draftsman believes that it is reasonable to focus the reform adjustment on those Member States where the sugar reform of 2005 failed.
EU je pod stalnim pritiskom držav, ki proizvajajo sladkor, kot na primer Brazilija, Avstralija in Tajska, ter Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, ki Evropsko unijo obtožujejo, da s svojo ureditvijo v sektorju sladkorja krši svoje dolžnosti v okviru sporazuma o kmetijstvu
The EU is under ongoing pressure from sugar producing countries like Brazil, Australia and Thailand and the World Trade Organization who accuse the European Union of violating, by its sugar regime, its obligations under the WTO Agreement on Agriculture .
Svetovna trgovinska organizacija, 28. aprila 2005 WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, WT/DS283/AB/R – EVROPSKE SKUPNOSTI – IZVOZNA NADOMESTILA ZA SLADKOR – Poročilo pritožbenega organa: http://docsonline.wto.org/gen_search.asp?searchmode=simple Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
World Trade Organisation, 28 April 2005, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, WT/DS283/AB/R -EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – EXPORT SUBSIDIES ON SUGAR - Report of the Appellate Body: http://docsonline.wto.org/gen_search.asp?searchmode=simple.
Komisija zato predlaga, naj se Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006 spremeni z namenom:
The Commission therefore proposes in the proposal to amend Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 to:
– spremeniti znesek pomoči, namenjen pridelovalcem in upravljavcem strojev, da bo znašal 10 % pomoči, ki se dodeli podjetjem za proizvodnjo sladkorja;
- fix the amount of aid to be reserved to growers and machinery contracts at 10% of the aid to be granted to sugar undertakings;
– pridelovalcem zagotoviti dodatno plačilo za tržno leto 2008/2009 (237,5 EUR na tono opuščene kvote);
- grant growers an additional payment for the 2008/2009 marketing year (EUR 237.5 per tonne of quota renounced);
– retroaktivno izplačati razliko med zneskom pomoči, dodeljenim za tržna leta 2006/2007 in 2007/2008, ter zneskom pomoči, izplačanim za tržno leto 2008/2009.
- pay, retroactively, the difference between the aid amount granted for the marketing years 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 and the amount paid in 2008/2009.
S predlogom se želi preprečiti oškodovanje podjetij in pridelovalcev, ki so sodelovali v shemi za prestrukturiranje pred začetkom veljave predlogov sprememb;
This is being proposed in order not to penalise undertakings and growers who took part in the restructuring scheme before the amendments come into force;
– dati Komisiji možnost, da podaljša rok za oddajo prošenj, da bi pospešila postopek prestrukturiranja, če ima na voljo zanesljive kazalnike, da bo cilj sklada za prestrukturiranje skoraj v celoti dosežen v tržnem letu 2008/2009;
- give the Commission the power to prolong the deadline for applications in order to accelerate the restructuring process, if it has reliable indications that the aim of the restructuring fund is nearly reached in the 2008/2009 marketing year;
– dati pridelovalcem možnost, da neposredno zaprosijo za pomoč, če podjetjem, s katerimi so imeli sklenjene dobavne pogodbe v prejšnjem tržnem letu, prenehajo dobavljati sladkorno peso ali trs;
- give growers the possibility to apply directly for restructuring aid on condition that they cease to deliver sugar beet or cane to undertakings to which they were bound by delivery contracts in the previous marketing year;
– omejiti zmanjšanje kvote na 10 % kvote, dodeljene vsakemu podjetju, kar ustreza odstotku kvote, ki ga lahko država članica vsako tržno leto prerazporedi;
- limit the quota reduction to 10% of the quota allocated to each undertaking, which corresponds to the percentage of quota which the Member State can re-allocate each marketing year;
– dati podjetjem za proizvodnjo sladkorja, na katera vpliva prošnja pridelovalca za pomoč, pravico, da zaprosijo za pomoč za prestrukturiranje
- give sugar undertakings which are affected by a grower's aid application the right to submit an application for restructuring aid.
S tem predlogom Svetu Komisija upa, da bodo proizvajalci opustili še dodatnih 3,8 milijonov ton, predvidenih do let 2008/2009 in 2009/2010.
By proposing this to the Council, the Commission hopes that producers will abandon the other 3.8 million tonnes foreseen until 2008/2009 and 2009/2010.
Z vidika finančne preglednosti bi morali biti podatki o prejemnikih nadomestil EU biti na voljo davkoplačevalcem EU.
From the perspective of financial transparency, actual recipients of EU compensation should be clearly visible to the EU taxpayer.
Predlagana objava podatkov o upravičencih skladov Skupnosti
The proposed publication of information on beneficiaries of Community funds
KOM (2007)0122, uredba o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike, Chatzimakakisovo poročilo , ki je bila Finančni uredbi dodana z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1995/2006 določa, da bodo potrebne podrobnosti določene v ustreznih pravilih posameznih sektorjev.
COM(2007)0122 , regulation to amend Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy, Chatzimakakis report , as inserted into the Financial Regulation by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006, provides that the necessary details shall be laid down in the relevant sector-specific rules.
To naj od 1. januarja 2008 velja tudi za proizvajalce sladkorja.
This should apply as from 1 January 2008 also to sugar producers.
Odbor za proračun bo preučil ohranitev nacionalnih kvot.
The Committee on Budgets will assess the fact that national quotas have been left in place.
Na ta način ne bo uresničen učinkovit trg EU, kar bo verjetno umetno dvignilo cene za potrošnike in za proračun.
A true EU market will not therefore be achieved, thus probably artificially pushing up the price to the consumer and to the Budget.
Zagotoviti je treba tudi, da nadomestila in pomoči za prilagoditev pridejo do tistih, ki jih potrebujejo, na primer do manjših upravičencev z nižjimi dohodki in ne do tistih, ki so zaradi sistema že ustvarili znatne profitne marže.
Also it has to be ensured that compensation and adjustment aids reach those in need, i.e. the smaller beneficiaries on lower incomes, and not those who have already made extensive profit margins from the system.
Sedanje pravilo „prvi pride, prvi dobi“ je diskriminatorno do manjših pridelovalcev sladkorja in ga je zato treba popraviti.
The current rule of "first come first served" discriminates against small sugar growers and should therefore be corrected.
(9a) V okviru pregleda Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti 1 , sta bila z namenom izvajanja pobude za preglednost v Evropi v navedeno uredbo dodana člena 30(3) in 53b(2)(d) o naknadni letni objavi seznama upravičencev do sredstev iz proračuna.
(9a) In the context of the revision of Council Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities 1 , Articles 30(3) and 53b(2)(d) on the annual ex-post publication of beneficiaries of funds deriving from the budget were inserted into that Regulation in order to implement the European Transparency Initiative.
Z uredbami za posamezne sektorje, kot je Uredba (ES) št. 1290/2005, se določi način takšne objave.
Sector-specific Regulations like Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 are to provide the means for such a publication.
Začasna shema za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006 je del proračuna Evropskih skupnosti in financira odhodke v okviru deljenega upravljanja med državami članicami in Skupnostjo.
The temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry as established by Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 forms part of the budget of the European Communities and finances expenditure in a context of shared management between the Member States and the Community.
Zato je treba določiti pravila za objavo informacij o upravičencih navedene sheme.
Rules should therefore be laid down for the publication of information on the beneficiaries of this scheme.
V ta namen morajo države članice zagotoviti naknadno letno objavo seznama upravičencev ter zneske, ki jih vsak upravičenec prejme.
To that end, Member States should ensure annual ex-post publication of the beneficiaries and the amounts received per beneficiary.
Načelo preglednosti določa člen 30(3) finančne uredbe in zlasti člen 53b(2) o deljenem upravljanju.
The principle of transparency is provided in Article 30(3) of the Financial Regulation and more particularly in Article 53b(2) for shared management.
Komisija je že sprejela posebna podrobna pravila za sektorske sklade (tj. evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj, evropskega socialnega sklada, kohezijskega sklada in evropskega ribiškega sklada).
The Commission has already adopted detailed specific rules for sectoral funds (i.e. for the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Fisheries Fund).
Zahteva po objavi upravičencev se določi tudi v spremenjeni Uredbi Sveta 1290/2006, trenutno predlagani v KOM(2007)0122 .
This requirement of publication of beneficiaries will also be laid down in the modified Council Regulation 1290/2006, currently proposed ( COM(2007)0122 ).
(9b) Z dostopom javnosti do informacij se poveča preglednost uporabe sredstev Skupnosti v skupni kmetijski politiki ter izboljša dobro finančno upravljanje navedenih sredstev, zlasti z okrepitvijo javnega nadzora nad porabljenim denarjem.
(9b) Making this information accessible to the public enhances transparency regarding the use of Community funds in the common agricultural policy and improves the sound financial management of these funds, in particular by reinforcing public control of the money used.