natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
16. izraža skrb ob pogostem pomanjkanju ustrezno usposobljenih tolmačev v nekaterih obiskanih centrih, tudi pri uradnih razgovorih; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo brezplačne javne storitve tolmačenja, po potrebi po telefonu ali prek interneta;
Expresses its concern over the frequent lack of adequately trained interpreters in some of the centres visited, including at official interviews; urges the Member States to provide a public interpreting service free of charge, if necessary by telephone or via the Internet;
Pravna pomo č
Legal assistance
Dostop do zdravstva
Access to health care
24. poziva države članice, naj zdravstveno zavarovanje, ki ga zagotavljajo prosilcem za azil in migrantom, razširijo, da se ne bi omejevalo na nujno oskrbo, ter naj zagotovijo tudi psihološko pomoč in skrb za duševno zdravje; opominja, da je pravica do zdravja in zdravstvene oskrbe ena od najbolj temeljnih pravic posameznika;
Calls on the Member States to extend the medical cover currently offered to asylum seekers and migrants so that it is not limited solely to emergency care, and to also provide psychological counselling and mental health care; points out that the right to health and medical treatment are among the most fundamental individual rights;
Dostop do zaposlitve
Access to employment
26. poziva države članice, naj ne postavljajo pravnih ali administrativnih omejitev, ki bi ovirale dostop do zaposlitve;
Calls on the Member States not to impose legal or administrative constraints amounting to obstacles to employment access;
Pomo č nevladnih organizacij
Assistance provided by NGOs
33. je zaskrbljen zaradi razmer v zaporih, v katerih so pridržani nezakoniti migranti in prosilci za azil, čeprav niso storili zločina; poziva, naj bodo prostori za pridržanje teh oseb ločeni in po možnosti odprti, da se jim zagotovi zaščita in pomoč;
Is concerned at the prison conditions in which irregular migrants and asylum seekers are detained even though they have committed no crime; calls for such persons to be detained in separate, preferably open buildings in order to ensure their protection and provision with assistance;
40. poziva države članice, naj razmislijo o vzpostavitvi neodvisnih uradnih organov za spremljanje standardov in razmer v zaprtih centrih ter o uvedbi uradnega sistema nadzora, ki bi izdajal poročila v zvezi s tem;
Calls on Member States to consider setting up independent official bodies to monitor standards and conditions in closed centres as well as implementing an official inspection system which will publish its reports;
47. želi, da bi bile vse osebe, ki se ukvarjajo z mladoletniki in mladoletniki brez spremstva, deležne posebnega usposabljanja, prilagojenega položaju otrok; meni, da bi nevladne organizacije, ki se ukvarjajo s tem področjem, lahko veliko prispevale;
Expects that everyone working with minors and unaccompanied minors will receive specialist training appropriate to the children’s situation; considers that non‑governmental organisations specialising in that field could make a major contribution to this;
48. zahteva, da se za vsakega mladoletnika brez spremstva imenuje neodvisen zakoniti skrbnik, ki mu bo zagotavljal zaščito v čakalnih prostorih, kot so letališča in železniške postaje, ter na ozemlju držav članic; zahteva jasno opredelitev njegovih pristojnosti in vloge;
Calls for an independent legal guardian to be appointed for each unaccompanied minor to ensure his or her protection both in waiting areas such as airports, railway stations and throughout the territory of the Member States; calls for the powers and role of the legal guardian to be clearly defined;
Ranljive osebe
Vulnerable persons
58. obžaluje, da nekatere države članice osebam, za katere velja dublinski sistem, omejujejo dostop do standardov za sprejem; poziva Komisijo, naj jasno ugotovi, da se Direktiva 2003/9/ES nanaša tudi na te osebe, da bi jim zagotovili uveljavljanje vseh pravic;
Regrets that certain Member States limit the access of persons under the Dublin System to reception standards; calls on the Commission to establish clearly that Directive 2003/9/EC also applies to such persons, in order to ensure that they are able to exercise their full rights;
o ukrepih Skupnosti v zvezi s kitolovom
on Community action in relation to whaling
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane .....................9
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 9
– ob upoštevanju Mednarodne konvencije o ureditvi lova na kite iz leta 1946 in ustanovitvi Mednarodne komisije za kitolov,
– having regard to the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling and the establishment of the International Whaling Commission (IWC),
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma Mednarodne komisije za kitolov o popolni omejitvi komercialnega kitolova (moratorij), ki je začel veljati leta 1986,
– having regard to the IWC's agreement on zero catch limits (the ‘moratorium’) for commercial whaling that came into effect in 1986,– having regard to the Cetacean update of the 2008 Red List of Threatened Species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature,
– ob upoštevanju, da so se leta 2008 kiti in delfini uvrstili na rdeči seznam ogroženih vrst Mednarodne zveze za ohranjanje narave,
– having regard to the meeting of the International Union for Conservation of Nature in Barcelona, 5-14 October 2008,
– ob upoštevanju členov 37 in 175 Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Articles 37 and 175 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. decembra 2007 o ukrepih Skupnosti v zvezi s kitolovom ( KOM(2007)0823 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 19 December 2007 on Community action in relation to whaling ( COM(2007)0823 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta z dne 3. junija 2008 o stališču Skupnosti o kitolovu
– having regard to the decision adopted by the Council on 5 June 2008 establishing the Community position on whaling
Sklep Sveta o sprejetju stališča, ki bo v imenu Evropske skupnosti zastopano na 60. seji Mednarodne komisije za lov na kite leta 2008 v zvezi s predlogi sprememb časovnega razporeda Mednarodne konvencije o ureditvi kitolova (dokument Sveta št. 9818/08). ,
Council Decision establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Community at the 60th meeting of the IWC in 2008 with regard to proposals for amendments to the Schedule of the International Convention on the Regulation of Whaling (Council document nr.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prostoživečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst (direktiva o habitatih)
– having regard to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the Habitats Directive)
UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.7. ,
– ob upoštevanju prepovedi mednarodne trgovinske menjave s proizvodi vseh vrst velikih kitov, ki je bila sprejeta s Konvencijo o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prostoživečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES) in jo izvaja EU,
– having regard to the adoption by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and its implementation by the EU of a ban on international commercial trade in the products of all species of great whales,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo in mnenja Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6–0025/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0025/2009 ),
A. ker mora biti varovanje biotske raznovrstnosti in ohranjanje vrst glavni cilj,
A. whereas the primary objective must be the protection of biodiversity, including the conservation of species,
B. ker je treba vedno upoštevati dobro počutje živali,
B. whereas animal welfare must always be taken into consideration,
C. ker kljub vsemu obstajajo vprašanja glede varnosti hrane in njene dobave, zlasti za skupnosti, ki so tradicionalno vezane na kitolov,
C. whereas there are, nonetheless, issues of food security and supply, particularly for communities that have traditionally engaged in whaling,
D. ker so namerno vznemirjanje, ulov in ubijanje vseh vrst kitov trenutno prepovedani v vodah Skupnosti z direktivo o habitatih,
D. whereas the “deliberate disturbance, capture or killing” of all whale species is currently prohibited in Community waters under the Habitats Directive,
E. ker je skoraj vsaka četrta vrsta kitov in delfinov (Cetacea) ogrožena, devet vrst je na seznamu ogroženih ali kritično ogroženih vrst, status številnih vrst in populacij pa je še vedno nejasen,
E. whereas almost one in four cetacean species are currently regarded as under threat, with nine species listed as either endangered or critically endangered, and the status of many species and populations remains unclear,
F. ker se nekatere populacije kitov po uvedbi moratorija niso obnovile in njihova sposobnost prilagajanja spreminjajočim se okoljskim razmeram ostaja neznana, kljub temu da so se nekatere izmed njih do določene mere obnovile,
F. whereas, although some whale populations have achieved some degree of recovery since the introduction of the moratorium, others have not and their ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions remains unknown,
G. ker naj bi moratorij prvotno veljal, dokler se ne bi pripravil ustrezen sistem upravljanja, njegov prvotni namen pa je bil omogočiti dovolj časa za obnovitev izčrpanih staležev,
G. whereas the moratorium was originally intended to last until an adequate management scheme was put in place and to allow adequate time for depleted stocks to recover,
H. ker vse članice Mednarodne komisije za kitolov niso podpisale moratorija,
H. whereas not all members of the IWC subscribe to the moratorium,
I. ker se moratorij v nobenem primeru ne nanaša na ubijanje kitov v znanstvene namene,
I. whereas the moratorium does not, in any event, cover the killing of whales for scientific purposes,
J. ker se je število s posebnimi dovoljenji ubitih kitov po uvedbi moratorija še povečalo,
J. whereas the number of whales killed under Special Permit has actually increased since the introduction of the moratorium,
K. ker so Mednarodna komisija za kitolov (v več kot 30 resolucijah) ter številne nevladne organizacije in druga telesa izrazili globoko zaskrbljenost nad tem, da je kitolov s posebnimi dovoljenji „v nasprotju z duhom moratorija za komercialni ribolov“ (Mednarodna komisija za kitolov 2003-2); meso, pridobljeno s takšnim kitolovom, se ne bi smelo uporabljati v komercialne namene,
K. whereas the IWC (in over 30 resolutions) and a number of NGOs and other bodies have expressed deep concern that current Special Permit whaling is “contrary to the spirit of the moratorium on commercial whaling” (IWC2003-2); the meat from such whaling should not be used for commercial purposes,
L. ker način ubijanja kitov kljub izboljšavam še vedno ne ustreza želenim standardom,
L. whereas, despite recent improvements, the methods by which whales are killed still fall short of the desired standard,
M. ker kitov in delfinov ne ogroža samo lov, ampak tudi podnebne spremembe, onesnaženje, udarci plovil, ribiška oprema, sonarji in druge nevarnosti,
M. whereas cetaceans are endangered not only by hunting but also by climate change, pollution, ship strikes, fishing gear, sonar and other hazards,
N. ker prej omenjeno stališče Sveta temelji samo na členu 175 Pogodbe o ES in se nanaša samo na zgoraj omenjeno srečanje Mednarodne komisije za kitolov v Santiagu (Čile) junija 2008,
N. whereas the above-mentioned Council decision relied only on Article 175 of the EC Treaty and related only to the above-mentioned meeting of the IWC in Santiago, Chile, in June 2008,
2. poziva Svet, naj sprejme novo skupno stališče v skladu s členoma 37 in 175 Pogodbe o ES,
Calls on the Council to adopt a new common position under Article 37 as well as Article 175 of the EC Treaty;
9. poziva tudi k ustanovitvi več morskih zaščitenih območij v različnih ustreznih delih sveta, v katerih bi bili kiti posebej zaščiteni;
Calls also for the establishment, in suitable locations around the world, of more Marine Protected Areas in which whales would receive special protection;
Dvajset od sedemindvajsetih držav članic EU so članice komisije.
20 out of 27 EU member states are members of the Commission.
Moratorij na tržni kitolov je bil uveden leta 1982 in prišel v veljavo leta 1986 kot posledica zaskrbljenosti zaradi ogroženosti vrst.
As a result of concerns about danger to the species, a moratorium on commercial whaling was established in 1982 and came into effect in 1986.
Njegov namen je bil, da bi veljal, dokler ne bi bil na voljo revidirani postopek upravljanja, ki bi na osnovi znanstvenih podatkov opredelil omejitve ulova.
This was intended to be pending a Revised Management Procedure to allow catch limits based on scientific data.
Postopek je bil opredeljen leta 1994, a spremljajoča revidirana shema upravljanja še vedno ni pripravljena.
The Procedure was agreed in 1994 but the accompanying Revised Management Scheme is still not in place.
Na srečanju v Santiagu (Čile) junija 2008 je Mednarodna komisija za kitolov ustanovila delovno skupino, ki bo rešila to vprašanje.
At its meeting in Santiago, Chile, in June 2008, the IWC set up a working group to move matters forward.
Svet je pred srečanjem v Čilu s kvalificirano večino sprejel skupno stališče za to srečanje.
Prior to the meeting in Chile, the Council adopted by qualified majority a common position for the purposes of that meeting.
Kitolov je tema, pri kateri si mnenja precej nasprotujejo.
Whaling is an issue on which opinion is considerably polarised.
Poudariti je treba, da se moratorij nanaša samo na komercialni kitolov.
It should be noted that the moratorium applies only to commercial whaling.
Poleg izjeme avtohtonega eksistenčnega kitolova, se lahko raziskave opravljajo s posebnimi dovoljenji, ki jih izda država, ki to raziskavo izvaja.
In addition to the exception for aboriginal whaling, scientific research can be undertaken under special permits which are issued by the country undertaking the research.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da memoranduma niso podpisale vse članice Mednarodne komisije za kitolov, tako da komercialni kitolov še vedno poteka.
It should also be noted that not all members of the IWC have subscribed to the moratorium so that commercial whaling still takes place.
Nedavna revizija, ki jo je opravila Mednarodna zveza za ohranjanje narave dokazuje, da bo skoraj vsaka četrta vrsta kitov in delfinov morda ogrožena, devet vrst pa je na seznamu ogroženih ali kritično ogroženih vrst.
A recent review by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature indicates that almost 1 in 4 cetacean species are under threat, with nine species listed as either endangered or critically endangered.
Obstajajo dokazi, da so se pri populacijah nekaterih vrst razmere od uvedbe moratorija izboljšale.
Since the introduction of the moratorium there is evidence of improvement in the populations of certain species, particularly larger whales.
Hkrati pa se zdi, da se je število ubitih kitov po uvedbi moratorija še povečalo.
At the same time, it appears that the number of whales killed has actually increased since the introduction of the moratorium.
Obstajajo tudi namigovanja, da se kitovo meso, ki je „stranski proizvod“ znanstvenih poskusov, uporablja v tržne namene.
There are suggestions, too, that the commercial use of whale meat is a by-product of “scientific whaling”.
Kite ogrožajo tudi udarci plovil, ribiška oprema, podnebne spremembe, sonarji in druge nevarnosti, kot je onesnaženje.
Whales are also threatened by ship strikes, fishing gear, climate change, sonar and other hazards such as pollution.
Zato je pomembno, da se razmere za kite in kitolov obravnavajo celostno in v skladu s pravili, katerim lahko ustrežejo vse članice Mednarodne komisije za kitolov.
It is important, therefore, that the situation of whales and the issue of whaling is addressed on a comprehensive basis and according to rules to which all members of the IWC can subscribe.
Če to ne bo storjeno, bodo kiti dolgoročno in kratkoročno še naprej ogroženi.
If this is not done, whale conservation will continue to be at risk in the both the short and the longer term.
Upati je, da bo sklep Sveta ustvaril celosten pristop in s tem pripomogel k dosegi soglasja.
It is hoped that any future Council Decision will take a suitably comprehensive approach and one that shall contribute to the achievement of a consensus.
Kljub temu, da so kiti v vodah Skupnosti po direktivi o habitatih zaščiteni pred namernim vznemirjanjem, ulovom in ubijanjem, so še naprej izpostavljeni drugim nevarnostim.
In addition, although whales are currently protected from “deliberate disturbance, capture or killing” in Community waters under the Habitats Directive, they remain subject to various other hazards.
Čeprav se je glede ribiške opreme že ukrepalo, bi bilo dobrodošlo, če bi Komisija predstavila nadaljnje predloge za zmanjšanje in po možnosti odpravo teh nevarnosti.
Although work has already been undertaken in relation to fishing gear, it would be helpful if the Commission could come forward with further proposals directed toward the reduction and, where possible, elimination of such hazards.
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za ribištvo, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. meni, da žalostna zgodovina komercialnega kitolova ter številni dejavniki, ki ogrožajo populacije kitov (med drugim tudi naključni ulov pri ribolovnih dejavnostih, trki s plovili in svetovne podnebne spremembe in obremenitev oceanov s hrupom) narekujejo EU, da v ključnih mednarodnih forumih usklajeno in dosledno podpira najvišjo raven varstva za kite na svetovni ravni;
Considers that the tragic history of commercial whaling, combined with the numerous threats currently faced by whale populations (including, inter alia, incidental catches in fishing operations, collisions with vessels, global climate change and ocean noise pollution ), dictates that the EU must promote, in key international fora, in a coordinated and coherent way , the highest level of protection for whales at a global level;
Direktiva Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst (UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora ( OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
7). , ki določa stališče Skupnosti glede kitov (in delfinov), ne dovoljuje obnovitve komercialnega kitolova za katerikoli stalež kitov v vodah EU;
7 ). defining the Community position with respect to whales (and dolphins) would not allow the resumption of commercial whaling in respect of any stock of whales in EU waters;
5. priznava občutljivost kitov in znatne možnosti za hudo in dolgo trpljenje med kitolovom; soglaša, da je ohranitev svetovnega moratorija na kitolov nujna z ozirom na pomisleke glede dobrega počutja živali ter podpira predloge, katerih namen je izboljšati humanost in nadzor dobrega počutja pri dejavnostih avtohtonega eksistenčnega kitolova;
Recognises the sentience of cetaceans and the significant potential for severe and prolonged suffering caused during whaling operations; agrees that maintenance of the global moratorium on whaling is imperative with respect to animal welfare concerns, and supports proposals which aim to improve the humaneness and welfare oversight of aboriginal subsistence whaling operations;
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Magor Imre Csibi, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Anne Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Jens Holm, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Urszula Krupa, Marios Matsakis, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panajotov, Vittorio Prodi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Amalia Sartori, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Magor Imre Csibi, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Anne Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Jens Holm, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Urszula Krupa, Marios Matsakis, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Amalia Sartori, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sankcijah zoper delodajalce državljanov tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo v EU
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council providing for sanctions against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals
Pripravljavka osnutka (*):
Rapporteur for opinion (*):
Edit Bauer , Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve
Edit Bauer , Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
(*) Pridruženi odbori - Člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE........................................................................................................24
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................25
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................25
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (*) .........26
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................49
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...51
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................59
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...61
(*) Pridruženi odbori - Člen 47 poslovnika
(*) Associated committee - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2007)0249 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0249 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 63(3)(b) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0143/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 63(3)(b) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0143/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6-0026/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6-0026/2009 ),
PREDLOGI SPREMEMB PARLAMENTA *
AMENDMENTS BY PARLIAMENT*
o minimalnih standardih glede sankcij zoper delodajalce državljanov tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo v EU
providing for minimum standards on sanctions against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 63(3)(b) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 63(3)(b) thereof,
UL C […], […], str. […]. ,
OJ C […], […], p. […]. ,