natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
10. poudarja temeljni pomen sodelovanja med institucijami Skupnosti kot nujen pogoj za uspeh vsake strategije poenostavitve; v zvezi s tem opozarja na pomembno znamenje dobre volje, ki ga je dal Evropski parlament s spremembami svojega poslovnika, katerih namen je olajšati postopek sprejemanja kodifikacij oziroma uvesti zakonodajni postopek ad hoc za prenovitve;
Stresses the vital importance of cooperation between the Community institutions as a prerequisite for the success of any simplification strategy; highlights in this respect the strong signal of goodwill emitted by the European Parliament thanks to the amendments to its Rules of Procedure designed, respectively, to facilitate the adoption procedure for codifications and to introduce an ad hoc legislative procedure for recasts;
13. poudarja, da imajo redne ocene učinka bistveno vlogo v postopku poenostavitve in da bi jih morala Svet in Parlament upoštevati pri vlaganju predlogov sprememb k predlogu v okviru zakonodajnega postopka.
Stresses that regular and thorough impact assessments play a key role in the simplification process and that such assessments should be considered by the Council and Parliament when amendments are made to a proposal during the legislative process;
S sporočilom KOM(2005) 535 „Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja“ z dne 25. oktobra 2005 je Komisija uvedla nov postopek izboljševanja kakovosti in učinkovitosti pravnega reda Skupnosti (t.i. „better lawmaking“ ali „better regulation“), tudi z namenom, da odpravi administrativno breme, ki brez potrebe pritiska na udeležence na notranjem trgu.
In its communication COM(2005) 535 ‘Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’ of 25 October 2005, the Commission began paving the way for improving the quality and effectiveness of the Community acquis (known as ‘ better lawmaking’ or ‘better regulation’ ), also with the aim of eliminating the administrative burdens which bear heavily on operators in the internal market, serving no useful purpose.
Sporočilo opisuje glavne tehnike poenostavitve in napoveduje 99 pobud, namenjenih izboljšanju kakovosti zakonodaje v obdobju 2005–2008.
The communication illustrated the main simplification techniques and announced 99 initiatives to improve legislative quality for the period 2005-2008.
Gre za 11 predlogov kodifikacije, 51 predlogov prenovitve, 7 predlogov razveljavitve in 30 predlogov, ki jih ni možno razporediti v nobeno od zgornjih vrst aktov, a katerih namen je prav tako poenostaviti zakonodajno okolje (t.i. poenostavitev vsebine).
These included 11 proposals for codification, 51 proposals for recasting, 7 proposals for repeal and 30 proposals which cannot be categorised under the any of the above but which nevertheless aim to simplify the regulatory framework (i.e. simplify the substance).
Spomnimo se, da je kodifikacija postopek, s katerim se razveljavijo akti, ki jih je treba kodificirati, in nadomestijo z enim samim aktom, ki ne vsebuje bistvenih sprememb glede na prve.
Codification is a process whereby the acts to be codified are repealed and replaced by a single act, without changing the substance of the provisions.
Postopek predvideva preoblikovanje konsolidiranega besedila v enoten, skladen in razumljiv pravni akt, ki formalno nadomesti izvorni akt in vse nadaljnje spremembe
It therefore involves the re-drafting of the text which is consolidated into a single, new legal act which is consistent and comprehensible and which officially replaces the original act and all subsequent amendments.
Delovanje kodifikacije v praksi omogoča posvetovalna skupina pravnih služb treh institucij, ki ima nalogo pretresti predloge Komisije ter zagotoviti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, da predlogi pomenijo resnično kodifikacijo in da Komisija v besedila ni uvedla bistvenih sprememb.
In practical terms, codification is made possible thanks to the Legal Services' Consultative Working Party of the three institutions, which has the task of assessing the Commission’s proposals and assuring the European Parliament and the Council that they are genuine codifications and that the Commission has not made any substantive changes to the texts.
Odstranitev vseh zastarelih določb, uskladitev terminologije, uporabljene v novem aktu, in priprava osnutka njenega uvodnega dela so del postopka kodifikacije.
The codification process includes the deletion of all obsolete provisions, the harmonisation of the terminology used in the new act and the drawing up of its preamble.
S tem mehanizmom je mogoče zmanjšati obseg zakonodaje, ne da bi se spremenilo njeno bistvo.
Thanks to this mechanism the volume of legislation can be reduced whilst leaving the substance unchanged.
Odbor za ustavne zadeve trenutno pretresa ustrezne spremembe Poslovnika Parlamenta, ki bi omogočile lažji dostop do postopkov poenostavitve.
At present, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs is examining the relevant amendments to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure to facilitate access to the simplification procedures.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je v zvezi s tem sprejel mnenje 20. decembra 2006. .
The Legal Affairs Committee adopted an opinion on this topic on 20 December 2006.
Prenovitev je postopek, pri katerem nov pravno zavezujoč akt, ki razveljavi akte, ki jih nadomesti, združi po eni strani spremembe politične vsebine zakonodaje in po drugi kodifikacijo tistega dela, ki ni spremenjen.
Recasting is a process whereby a new legally binding act repealing the acts which it replaces combines both the amendment of the substance of the legislation and the codification of the remaining provisions which are intended to remain unchanged.
Prenovitev ureja medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 28. novembra 2001
Recasting is governed by the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001
Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematični uporabi prenovitve pravnih aktov (UL C 77, 28.3.2002, str.1).
Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, OJ C 77, 28.03.2002, p.
Razveljavitev pa pomeni odpravo zakonodajnih aktov, ki so bili sprejeti po letu 1957 in so s časom postali nepomembni ali zastareli zaradi tehničnega ali tehnološkega napredka, razvoja politik Evropske unije, sprememb uporabe splošnih pravil Pogodbe ali oblikovanja mednarodnih pravil ali standardov.
Lastly, repeal consists of eliminating the legislative acts adopted since 1957 which have subsequently become irrelevant or obsolete due to technical or technological progress, the evolution in the policies pursued by the Union, changes in the way general Treaty rules are applied, or the development of international rules or standards.
Kot je znano, je poenostavitev postala predmet medinstitucionalnega sporazuma "Boljša priprava zakonodaje", podpisanega 16. decembra 2003
As Members will be aware, simplification was the subject of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on better lawmaking, signed on 16 December 2003
2003, str.1 , v katerem je obravnavanih več vidikov tega vprašanja: od boljšega usklajevanja zakonodajnega postopka do večje preglednosti in dostopnosti, od ocen učinka do prenosa zakonodaje Skupnosti, od tehnik kodifikacije in poenostavitve do komitologije ter od nadomestnih načinov urejanja do zmanjšanja obsega zakonodaje.
1 , which examines different aspects of the issue: better coordination in the legislative process; greater transparency and accessibility; impact analyses; the transposition of Community law; codification and simplification techniques; comitology; alternative methods of regulation and the reduction in the volume of legislation.
Nedavni dogodki
Recent developments
14. novembra 2006 je Evropska komisija sprejela delovni dokument z naslovom „ Prvo poročilo o napredku glede strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja “ ( KOM(2006)0690 konč.), ki je nadaljevanje omenjenega sporočila KOM(2005) 535 iz oktobra 2005 „Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja.“
On 14 November 2006 the Commission adopted a working document entitled ‘ First progress report on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment ’ (COM(2006) 690 final) which is a follow-up to the above-mentioned communication COM(2005) 535 ‘Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: A strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’.
Ta delovni dokument ugotavlja doseženi napredek pri izvajanju tekočega programa poenostavitve, uvedenega leta 2005, in predstavlja nekatere nove pobude, ki bodo okrepile tekoči program poenostavitve v obdobju 2006–2009.
This working document takes stock of progress achieved in implementing the simplification rolling programme introduced in October 2005 and presents a number of new initiatives which will enhance the programme over the period 2006-2009.
Eden od ključnih dosežkov poenostavitve je postopno vključevanje vseh področij zakonodaje ES.
One of the key achievements of simplification is the progressive coverage of all EC regulatory areas.
V novem tekočem programu poenostavitve je tako napovedanih 43 prenovitev, 12 kodifikacij, 8 razveljavitev in 46 drugih ukrepov vsebinskih poenostavitev.
In particular, the new simplification rolling programme will include 43 recasts, 12 codifications, 8 repeals and 46 other measures relating to substantive simplification.
K tem je treba prišteti približno 500 novih zakonodajnih pobud, ki jih vsebuje drug tekoči program, namenjen izrecno kodifikacijam (teh je samo za leto 2007 napovedanih 200).
In addition to these, some 500 new legislative initiatives have been included in another rolling programme specifically dedicated to codifications (some 200 of which in 2007 alone).
Prvo poročilo o napredku sočasno obravnava tudi dejavnike, ki zagotavljajo uspeh ciljev poenostavitve, zlasti homogeni sklop metodologij, izboljšan na podlagi institucionalnega sodelovanja z Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom, pa tudi obširnejšo uporabo samoregulacije in koregulacije.
This first progress report also addresses the success factors for achieving the simplification goals, in particular a solid set of methodologies, improved inter institutional cooperation with the European Parliament and the Council and increased use of self-regulation and co-regulation.
Prisotna je tudi skrb, da se s poenostavitvijo na nacionalni ravni zagotovi, da prednosti, ki jih prinaša poenostavitev na evropski ravni, ne bi ogrozili nacionalni predpisi ali tehnične ovire.
There is also concern that simplification at national level should ensure that the benefits of simplification at EU level are not jeopardised by national rules or technical barriers.
Sporna vprašanja in stališče poročevalca
Problem areas and the rapporteur’s position
Opozoriti je treba na dejstvo, da so pobude za poenostavitev prvič vključene v zakonodajni in delovni program Komisije za leto 2007: kar jasno kaže, da je strategija za poenostavitev politična prednostna naloga.
It is worth noting that for the first time, the simplification initiatives have been included in the Commission’s legislative and work programme for 2007; this clearly demonstrates the political priority being given to the simplification strategy.
Po drugi strani pa se kot cilj, ki ga je treba doseči do leta 2012, navaja skupno 25-odstotno zmanjšanje obsega zakonodaje Skupnosti in nacionalne zakonodaje.
However, the target to be achieved by 2012 is to reduce Community and national legislation overall by 25%.
Vseeno bi bilo treba vztrajati, da Komisija:
Nevertheless, this point should be stressed, in order to persuade the Commission
· odslej naprej sistematično vključuje pobude za poenostavitev v posebni del zakonodajnega in delovnega programa;
· to systematically include the simplification initiatives, from now on, in a specific part of the legislative and work programme;
· v omenjenem delu programa navede, kakšno prednost namerava dati posameznim pobudam poenostavitve;
· to indicate therein what priority it intends to give to each individual simplification initiative, and
· prepreči nastajanje prevelikega števila dokumentov z navedenimi seznami pobud za poenostavitev, da bi bil referenčni okvir čim jasnejši;
· to avoid the proliferation of documents containing lists of simplification initiatives, in order to have as clear a reference framework as possible.
Kljub temu ostaja program kodifikacije okviren, saj je odvisen od tega, ali so akti, ki jih je treba kodificirati, dostopni v vseh jezikih, vključno z bolgarščino in romunščino.
However, the document points out that the codification programme remains indicative since it depends on the availability of the acts to be codified in all languages, in particular in Bulgarian and Romanian.
Poleg tega je treba kodifikacijo prestaviti, če so predvidene nove spremembe aktov.
In addition, codification has to be postponed when new amendments of these acts are envisaged.
Po mnenju Komisije se bo vrstni red aktov v programu spreminjal glede na ta dva dejavnika.
According to the Commission, the order of acts in the programme will change in the light of these two factors.
Ne glede na težave, povezane s prevajanjem, ki so razumljive, čeprav bi jih morala Komisija začeti reševati čimprej, učinek novih aktov na pobude za kodifikacijo ne sme škoditi celotnemu procesu poenostavitve.
Apart from the translation-related difficulties, which are understandable (although the Commission should address this issue as soon as possible), the impact on the codification initiatives of the new acts should not undermine the entire simplification process.
Očitno je, da Komisija, ki ima v okviru prvega stebra izključno pravico do zakonodajne pobude, ne bo smela v zakonodajnem in delovnem programu navesti načrtov za kodifikacijo istih vsebin, ki jih namerava predlagati kot nove (običajne) zakonodajne predloge.
Since under the first pillar the Commission has the monopoly over legislative initiative, clearly, if it intends to put forward new (standard) legislative proposals it will have to refrain from setting out in its legislative and work programme plans for codification on the same topics.
Spet se pojavi potreba, da je Komisija dosledna do same sebe in do ciljev poenostavitve, ki jih je sama izpostavila.
Once again, the Commission needs to be consistent, also in relation to the simplification aims it has highlighted.
Tu je treba opozoriti še na priložnost, da postane prenovitev enkrat za vselej običajna zakonodajna tehnika: tako bi bilo vedno na voljo celotno zakonodajno besedilo, tudi kadar bi bile prisotne specifične spremembe, z jasno navedbo novih in nespremenjenih delov.
Likewise, recasting should become, once and for all, the standard legislative technique ; it would thus always be possible to have the regulatory text in its entirety, also where there are specific amendments, with a clear indication of the new parts and those which remain unchanged.
S tem bi dosegli večjo čitljivost in preglednost zakonodaje Skupnosti.
This would result in greater legibility and transparency of Community legislation;
V zvezi s tem so gotovo koristne sektorske analize in meritve upravne obremenitve, ki jo povzroča veljavna zakonodaja Skupnosti.
In this regard, sector-specific analyses and the measurement of the administrative burdens generated by existing Community legislation are certainly helpful.
Glede sodelovanja med institucijami Skupnosti je v poročilu poudarjeno pomembno znamenje dobre volje, ki izhaja iz spremembe poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi z izboljšanjem in uvedbo postopka za kodifikacije (člen 80) oziroma novega postopka ad hoc za prenovitve (člen 80a).
As far as cooperation between the Community institutions is concerned , the report seeks to highlight the strong signal of goodwill given by the amendment to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure relating to the improvement and introduction, respectively, of the codification procedure (Rule 80) and a new ad hoc procedure for recasts (Rule 80(a)).
Sprememba, v zvezi s katero še teče razprava v Odboru za ustavne zadeve, naj bi začela veljati v kratkem.
The amendment, which is still being discussed in the Constitutional Affairs Committee, should come into force shortly.
Glede koregulacije in samoregulacije
With regard to co-regulation and self-regulation
Na koncu lahko nedvomno izrazi strinjanje s Komisijo, da procesa poenostavitve, ki je bil sprožen na evropski ravni, ne smejo ogroziti nacionalne odločitve, ki gredo v nasprotno smer: zato ga mora vedno spremljati poenostavitev na nacionalni ravni .
Lastly, Parliament can undoubtedly agree with the Commission that the simplification process promoted at European level cannot be jeopardised by national decisions which go in the opposite direction, but must always be accompanied by national simplification measures .
Poročilo želi poudariti, da je naloga Komisije usmerjati in spremljati ta proces tudi na nacionalni ravni, na primer tako, da opravlja funkcijo centra za zbiranje in širjenje najboljših praks , razvitih v Evropski uniji in v državah članicah.
The report wishes to emphasise that it is up to the Commission to guide and monitor this process, also at national level, for instance by acting as a centre for collecting and disseminating the best practices developed within the European Union and its Member States.
o strategiji za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja
on "The strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment"
i) polna vključenost Evropskega parlamenta;
(i) full involvement of the European Parliament;
ii) obširno in pregledno posvetovanje med vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, tudi nevladnimi organizacijami;
(ii) wide and transparent consultation of all relevant stakeholders, including non-governmental organisations;
iii) povečanje splošne preglednosti zakonodajnega postopka;
(iii) strengthening of the general transparency of the regulatory process;
iv) vsaka ocena poenostavitve mora v enaki meri upoštevati gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike ter ne sme omejiti na kratkoročno presojo;
(iv) any assessment for simplification has to consider economic, social, environmental and health aspects on an equal footing and should not be limited to short-term considerations;
v) postopek poenostavitve ne sme pod nobenim pogojem pomeniti zniževanja meril, ki jih vsebuje veljavna zakonodaja;
(v) the simplification process must under no circumstance entail lowering the standards contained in current legislation;
4. poziva Komisijo, da se bolj posveča izvajanju, izvrševanju in ocenjevanju zakonodaje Skupnosti kot bistvenemu delu postopka za boljšo pravno ureditev;
Urges the Commission to put more emphasis on implementation, enforcement and evaluation of Community legislation, as an essential part of the Better Regulation process;
6. podpira zaključke študije o poenostavitvi okoljske politike EU, ki potrjuje, da so lahko presoje vplivov ključnega pomena pri zagotavljanju boljše pravne ureditve in da je treba kakovost nekaterih izmed njih izboljšati.
Supports the conclusion from the study "Simplifying EU Environmental Policy" that Impact Assessments can play an essential role in ensuring better regulation and that the quality of some of these Assessments needs to be improved.
Zato Komisijo poziva, da zagotovi:
Urges the Commission to ensure:
- da je za pripravo teh presoj na voljo dovolj časa in finančnih virov;
- that adequate time and financial resources are allocated for these assessments;
- da vsaka presoja vplivov enako upošteva gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike, tako kratkoročno kot dolgoročno;
- that impact assessments consider economic, social, environmental and health aspects on an equal footing, both in the short and the longer term;
- da presoje vplivov ne upoštevajo zgolj stroškov samih ukrepov, ampak tudi stroške, ki nastanejo, ker določena vprašanja v zvezi z okoljem, javnim zdravjem in prehrano niso bila obravnavana;
- that impact assessments consider not only the costs of measures but also the costs of not addressing the environmental, public health or food issues;
- preglednost in vlaganje vseh zadevnih zainteresiranih strani;
- transparency and input of all relevant stakeholders;
- da so presoje vplivov dovolj obsežne in upoštevajo različne nacionalne okoliščine v državah članicah.
- that the impact assessments are broad enough in scope and take into account the different national circumstances in the Member States.
7. poziva Komisijo, da v državah članicah še naprej spodbuja izmenjavo informacij o najboljših praksah za poenostavitev okoljske politike EU, kot so:
Calls on the Commission to further promote exchange of information on the best practices on simplification of EU environmental policy in the Member States, such as:
- uporaba informacijske tehnologije za zmanjšanje upravne obremenitve;
- the use of Information Technology to reduce the administrative burden;
- poenostavitev in povezovanje sistemov za izdajanje dovoljenj in licenc, hkrati pa varovanje okoljskih in zdravstvenih standardov;
- the simplification and integration of permit schemes and licensing, while safeguarding environmental and health standards;
- poenostavitev in integracija zahtev glede spremljanja in poročanja, vključno s pristopom na podlagi tveganja, hkrati pa ohranjanje preglednosti ter učinkovite uporabe in dejanskega izvrševanja predpisov;
- the simplification and integration of monitoring and reporting requirements, including the risk-based approach, while safeguarding transparency and effective implementation and enforcement.
VSI 26.4.2007
ALL 26.4.2007
o priporočilu za sklep Sveta o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije h Konvenciji z dne 26. maja 1997, sestavljeni na podlagi člena K.3(2)(c) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, o boju proti korupciji uradnikov Evropskih skupnosti ali uradnikov držav članic Evropske unije
on the recommendation for a Council decision concerning the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 26 May 1997, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union, on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0218 )
– having regard to the Commission recommendation to the Council ( COM(2007)0218 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 3(4) akta o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0156/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0156/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0272/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0272/2007 ),
Z aktom o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije iz leta 2005
The 2005 Act of accession of Bulgaria and Romania
UL L 157, 21.6.2005, str.
OJ 21.6.2005, L 157, p.
Pogajanja in sklenitev posebnih pridružitvenih protokolov k tem konvencijam (ki bi zahtevali ratifikacije 27 držav), niso več potrebni: člen 3(3) akta namreč preprosto določa, da Bolgarija in Romunija k tem konvencijam in protokolom pristopita na podlagi akta o pristopu.
It is indeed not anymore necessary, as in the past, to negotiate and conclude specific accession protocols to these conventions (which would have implied ratification by 27 States): Article 3(3) of the Act provides simply that Bulgaria and Romania accede to these conventions and protocols by virtue of the Act of Accession.