natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
19. opozarja na posebnost določb o pravici do ustanavljanja in o začasnem opravljanju storitev v drugi državi članici; poziva Komisijo, naj pri ocenjevanju to posebnost v celoti upošteva;
Draws attention to the specific nature of the provisions on the right of establishment and those on the temporary provision of services in another Member State; asks the Commission to take full account of that specific nature in its evaluation;
Enotne kontaktne točke
Points of single contact (PSCs)
27. poziva države članice, naj povečajo dostopnost elektronskih postopkov, vključno s prevodom najpomembnejših obrazcev; poziva jih, naj uporabnikom enotnih kontaktnih točk omogočijo sledenje napredku v potekajočih postopkih;
Calls on the Member States to enhance the availability of electronic procedures, including a translation of all relevant forms; calls on the Member States to offer tracking facilities for PSCs' users enabling them to check the progress of ongoing procedures;
29. poudarja, da je glede uporabnikom prijazne izvedbe še posebej pomembno razčistiti, katere zahteve veljajo za trajno ustanovitev podjetja v nasprotju z začasnim izvajanjem čezmejnih storitev;
Stresses that it is particularly important with a view to user-friendliness to clarify which requirements apply to the permanent establishment of a business as opposed to the temporary cross-border provision of services;
31. meni, da sta dialog in izmenjava najboljše prakse med državami članicami zelo pomembna, če naj se enotne kontaktne točke izboljšujejo in razvijajo; poudarja, da je v državah, kjer tovrstnih točk še ni ali še ne delujejo pravilno, nujno treba ukrepati; poziva večino držav članic, naj si še bolj prizadevajo za dokončanje vseh postopkov in formalnosti prek enotnih kontaktnih točk;
Believes that a dialogue and an exchange of best practices between Member States are very important if the PSCs are to improve and develop; stresses the need for urgent action in those countries in which PSCs either do not yet exist or are not operating properly; urges most Member States to redouble their efforts to allow the completion of all procedures and formalities through the PSCs;
33. poziva države članice, naj Komisiji redno posredujejo primerljive statistične podatke, potrebne za oceno delovanja enotnih kontaktnih točk ter njihovega vpliva na nacionalni in evropski ravni, zlasti pri izvajanju čezmejnih storitev; poziva Komisijo, naj določi merila za oceno enotnih kontaktnih točk; meni, da bi morala ta merila temeljiti na kvantitativnih in kvalitativnih kazalnikih;
Calls on the Member States to provide the Commission on a regular basis with the comparable statistical data required to evaluate the functioning of the PSCs and their impact at national and European level, in particular as regards the provision of cross-border services; calls on the Commission to lay down clear criteria for the evaluation of the PSCs; considers that these criteria should be based on both quantitative and qualitative indicators;
37. meni, da mora glede na zapleteno zakonodajo vsak državljan imeti možnost, da se posvetuje z organi, pristojnimi za kako področje, in dobi natančen odgovor na svoja vprašanja; meni, da bi bilo treba na področju delovnega in socialnovarstvenega prava razviti pojem vnaprejšnjih upravnih odločitev, da bi odpravili pravno negotovost; nadalje meni, da bi bilo treba za zagotovitev preglednosti sprejete odločitve objaviti;
Considers that, in the light of the complexity of the legislation, each citizen must be able to consult the relevant authorities in order to obtain a precise reply to his/her questions; considers that the concept of advance administrative rulings should therefore be developed in the area of labour law and in the area of social security in order to combat legal uncertainty; considers, furthermore, that, in order to ensure transparency, the decisions taken should be published;
39. pozdravlja, da je vedno več pristojnih nacionalnih organov prijavljenih za nadzor storitev v informacijskem sistemu za notranji trg, kar omogoča neposredno, hitro in učinkovito izmenjavo informacij; meni, da bi se ta sistem lahko uporabljal za druge sorodne direktive;
Welcomes the growing number of enrolments by the competent national authorities for monitoring of services through the internal market information system (IMI), thus permitting the direct, rapid and effective exchange of information; considers that the IMI can be used for other relevant directives;
41. meni, da je koristno vzpostaviti sodelovanje v sklopu evropske mreže javnih uprav držav članic in izmenjavo informacij o zanesljivosti izvajalcev storitev, da bi odpravili dodatni nadzor, ki se uporablja za čezmejne dejavnosti;
Considers it useful to establish cooperation within a European network formed by the Member States’ public authorities and to set up an interchange of information on the reliability of service providers, with a view to eliminating additional controls applied to cross-border activities;
43. meni, da bi morali biti upravni postopki učinkovitejši; šteje za koristno, da bi enotne kontaktne točke tesno sodelovale in si izmenjevale izkušnje glede čezmejnih storitev v različnih evropskih regijah;
Takes the view that administrative procedures must become more efficient; considers that it would be useful in this connection to establish close cooperation between the points of single contact so that they can exchange experiences in the field of cross-border services in the various regions of Europe;
44. opozarja, da je iz področja uporabe direktive izključena vrsta področij, tudi negospodarske storitve splošnega pomena, zdravstvene storitve ter večina socialnih storitev; dodaja, da direktiva ne vpliva na delovno pravo niti na zakonodajo držav članic na področju socialnega varstva;
Recalls that the Directive excludes a number of fields from its scope, including non-economic services of general interest, healthcare services and most social services; notes that the Directive does not apply to labour law and does not affect Member States’ social security legislation either;
47. poziva, naj se pri izvajanju te direktive bolj upošteva temeljno načelo lokalne samouprave, za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena pa naj se kolikor mogoče zmanjšajo birokratske upravne obremenitve in omejitve glede pooblastil za odločanje na lokalni ravni;
Calls for greater account to be taken of the basic principle of local self-government when implementing the Directive, and for bureaucratic administrative burdens and restrictions on local-level decision-making powers with regard to services of general economic interest to be avoided insofar as possible;
Z 28. decembrom 2006 je začela veljati evropska direktiva o storitvah (2006/123/ES).
On 28 December 2006 the European Services Directive (2006/123/EC) took effect.
Namen tega akta je ponudnikom storitev odpreti trg v Evropski uniji, postopoma odpraviti protekcionistične omejitve držav članic za izvajanje storitvenih dejavnosti ter uresničiti načelo prostega pretoka, ki je temelj skupnega trga; evropskim ponudnikom storitev naj bi torej omogočil, da bodo svoje dejavnosti povsod v EU izvajali brez birokratskih ovir.
Its aim is to open up the market for service providers in the European Union, phase out the Member States’ protectionist barriers on the exercise of service activities and fulfil the principle of freedom of movement, the basis for the common market: in other words, to ensure that European service providers are able to work without bureaucratic hindrance anywhere in the EU.
Namen tega akta je dostop do trgov urediti tako, da se odpravijo samovoljne ovire oziroma da bodo pravila držav članic ustrezna in nediskriminatorna.
The purpose of the Directive is to influence access to the markets in such a way that arbitrary barriers are phased out and any rules that are maintained in the Member States are appropriate and non-discriminatory.
Izrecno je poudarjeno, da ne posega niti v delovno pravo niti v pravice delavcev, na kar je Evropski parlament še posebej pozoren.
It has been expressly confirmed that neither employment law nor employees’ rights are affected by the legislative project, an aspect to which Parliament has attached especial importance.
S tem se ohranijo evropski in nacionalni dosežki.
European and national achievements have thus been preserved.
Načelo države izvora, za katerega kritiki trdijo, da samo utira pot socialnemu dampingu, in po katerem za neevropske ponudnike storitev veljajo pravila njihove matične države članice, se črta in nadomesti z načelom ciljne države.
The ‘country of origin’ principle, by which service providers active in other EU Member States were to be subject solely to the rules of their home country, which was criticised as paving the way for social dumping, was discarded and replaced with the ‘destination country’ principle.
Direktiva tako državam omogoča uporabo lastnih določb o pogojih zaposlovanja, vključno s tistimi, ki so določene v splošnih kolektivnih pogodbah.
The Directive now allows countries to apply their own rules on employment conditions, including those that are determined by generally binding collective pay agreements.
Poudariti je treba, da je Evropski parlament bil in še vedno je gonilo zakonodaje, Svet pa večinoma sledi njegovim predlogom.
It should be borne in mind that the European Parliament has become the driving force for legislation and, gratifyingly, the Council has largely followed Parliament’s proposals.
V členu 16 je še posebej poudarjeno, da državi članici, v katero se odpravi ponudnik, ni preprečeno, da uveljavi zahteve glede opravljanja storitvenih dejavnosti, kadar so te v skladu z odstavkom 1 in utemeljene iz razlogov javnega reda, javne varnosti, javnega zdravja ali varstva okolja.
In particular, as regards the wording of Article 16, which clearly states that ‘the Member State to which the provider moves shall not be prevented from imposing requirements with regard to the provision of a service activity, where they are justified for reasons of public policy, public security, public health or the protection of the environment and in accordance with paragraph 1.
Državi članici ni preprečeno niti, da v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti uporabi svoje predpise o pogojih zaposlovanja, vključno s tistimi v kolektivnih pogodbah.
Nor shall that Member State be prevented from applying, in accordance with Community law, its rules on employment conditions, including those laid down in collective agreements.’
Evropski parlament je pri prenosu te direktive v državah članicah sprva opazil zamude in občasno vroče razprave.
Parliament initially detected delays in the implementation of the Services Directive in the Member States and in some cases fierce debate.
Zato se je odločil, da bo procesu prenosa natančno sledil in ga spremljal.
It accordingly decided to keep a close watching brief on the implementation process.
Obravnaval je pomanjkljivosti pri prenosu in vprašanja o tolmačenju in uporabi direktive, kar je bilo izhodišče pričujočega poročila.
Failings of implementation and questions of interpretation or application of the Directive have been raised.
Področje uporabe
This was the reason for the present report.
Niso pa zajete negospodarske storitve splošnega pomena, finančne in prometne storitve, storitve agencij za začasno zaposlovanje, zdravstvene in socialne storitve s področja oskrbe, otroškega varstva in gradnje stanovanj.
The services that are not covered include non-economic services of general interest, financial services, transport services, the services of temporary employment agencies, health services and those considered social services in the area of care, child care and social housing.
Direktiva ne ogroža storitev splošnega pomena in v nobenem primeru ni namenjena šibitvi javnih socialnovarstvenih storitev.
Services of general interest are not threatened by the Directive, which cannot serve the purpose of undermining public welfare provision.
Še posebej pa poudarja, da prenos direktive o storitvah ne bi smel biti pretveza za deregulacijo ali privatizacijo v državah članicah.
She also points out that implementation of the Services Directive must not be used as a pretext for deregulation or privatisation in the Member States.
Če želijo države članice izvesti deregulacijo, morajo za to tudi prevzeti odgovornost.
If a government wants to carry out deregulation it should also take responsibility for its own actions.
Med procesom prenosa se je izkazalo, da mnogim izvajalcem ni jasno, ali direktiva za storitve, ki jih ponujajo, velja ali ne.
In the course of implementation it has become evident that many service providers are unclear whether or not the service they provide comes under the Directive.
To še posebej velja za člen 2(j).
This is particularly true of Article 2(j).
Tu države članice spodbujamo, naj izkoristijo instrumente direktive in jih uporabijo, kadar gre na primer za to, da bi otroško varstvo izvzele iz področja delovanja direktive o storitvah.
Here the Member States are urged to use and apply the Directive’s instruments, for instance in order to ensure that childcare provision is removed from the Directive’s scope.
Poleg tega poročevalka poudarja, da ni pomembno samo, da se storitve po tej direktivi jasno razmejijo od storitev splošnega pomena, pač pa tudi, da se z okvirno zakonodajo zagotovi varstvo storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
The rapporteur further points out that there is a need not only to draw a clear distinction between the services coming under this Directive and services of general interest, but also to safeguard services of general economic interest by means of framework legislation.
Enotne kontaktne točke
Points of single contact ( PSCs )
Za izvajalce storitev je gotovo velika prednost poenostavitev upravnega postopka in oblikovanje enotnih kontaktnih točk.
The simplification of administrative procedures and creation of PSCs are undoubtedly major advantages for service providers.
Če bo ta instrument pravilno vzpostavljen, bo lahko za mala in srednja podjetja zelo pomemben.
This instrument can, when properly set up, be of especial importance to small businesses.
Omogočeno bi moralo biti, da bi z uporabo enotnih kontaktnih točk izvedli vse postopke in formalnosti za začetek in izvajanje storitev, tudi čezmejnih.
It should be possible to use these contact points to complete all the procedures and formalities required to take up and carry on a service activity involving crossborder provision.
Enotne kontaktne točke bodo dajale na voljo natančne, popolne in razumljive informacije o formalnih zahtevah, upravnih postopkih in zakonih, ki jih je treba upoštevati, in tako dalje.
They should be making available precise, complete and comprehensible information on formalities, administrative procedures, the laws to be complied with, and so on.
Poročevalka pričakuje, da bodo k oblikovanju enotnih kontaktnih točk pritegnjene vse zainteresirane strani, torej poleg podjetij tudi predstavniki delavcev, zato da se zagotovi, da bodo podane vse potrebne informacije, zlasti v zvezi z veljavnim delovnim pravom.
The rapporteur assumes that all the stakeholders, i.e. not only companies but also employees’ representatives, have been involved in setting up the PSCs, to ensure that all the relevant information can be provided, particularly on the employment law applicable, so that any problems that may arise can be settled as rapidly and straightforwardly as possible.
Na ta način bi lahko morebitne težave rešili kolikor mogoče hitro in preprosto.
The rapporteur does consider it inappropriate for the PSCs to be restricted solely to electronic form.
Poročevalka meni, da nikakor ni primerno, da bi bile enotne kontaktne točke samo elektronske.
Personal counselling by qualified staff should be the rule.
Pravilo bi moralo biti osebno svetovanje usposobljenega osebja.
For this reason the PSCs should be required to inform service providers of the applicable employment and social law.
Ravno zato bi morale biti enotne kontaktne točke obvezane, da izvajalce storitev obveščajo o veljavnem delovnem in socialnem pravu, saj samo tako lahko preprečimo, da bi se ti sklicevali na nepoznavanje pravnih norm države, v kateri izvajajo storitve.
This is the only way to prevent service providers from claiming they are not aware of the rules and regulations of the country concerned.
Potrebno bi bilo tudi je usklajevanje posameznih agencij, da bi izvajalcem storitev omogočili pridobitev čim bolj ažurnih informacij.
Moreover coordination of the individual agencies would be needed to ensure that service providers received the most up-to-date information.
Samo po sebi se razume, da mora biti ponudba dostopna v več jezikih.
The need for such information to be accessible in several languages should also be self-explanatory.
V direktivi o storitvah je opisano upravno sodelovanje, ki je potrebno za jasen pregled nad obveznostmi matične države in držav članic, v katerih se izvajajo storitve.
The Services Directive describes the administrative cooperation needed for a clear view of requirements in the home Member State and in the Member States where the services are provided.
Pri tem bo lahko v pomoč informacijski sistem za notranji trg (IMI), ki naj bi pristojnim organom držav članic pomagal pri premagovanju praktičnih ovir.
Here the internal market information system (IMI) can help the relevant authorities in the Member States to surmount practical barriers.
Sistem IMI je dragoceno orodje, ki podpira delo uprav, saj lahko prek enotnih kontaktnih točk v drugih državah pomaga pri spoprijemanju razlik v upravni praksi, jezikovne težave ali pomanjkljive informacije.
The IMI is a laudable instrument as it supports the work of the administrations by dealing with differing administrative practices, language problems or inadequate information via the contact points in other Member States.
Poročevalka bo v prihodnje pozorna, da se bo ta sistem dejansko začel uporabljati.
The rapporteur will in future be taking a closer interest in ensuring that this system is actually used.
Države članice morajo tu še vedno marsikaj nadoknaditi.
This is an area where the Member States still seem to have some catching up to do.
Poročevalka bi želela še enkrat poudariti, da postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, ki ga je uvedel Svet, zaenkrat organom držav članic na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni povzroča nepotrebno upravno obremenitev.
The rapporteur would like to repeat the point that the procedure for mutual evaluation introduced by the Council at the time is causing unnecessary bureaucratic burdens for the Member States’ administrations at national, regional and local level.
Poleg številnih nacionalnih zakonov, ki jih je treba prilagoditi direktivi o storitvah, morajo države članice poročati Komisiji o svojih sistemih dovoljenj (člen 9(2)), zahtevah glede pravice do opravljanja storitvene dejavnosti (člen 15) ter zahtevah za multidisciplinarne dejavnosti (člen 25(3)).
In addition to the large number of national laws that need to be adapted to the Services Directive, the Member States have to notify the Commission of their authorisation schemes (Article 9(2)), their requirements on freedom of establishment (Article 15) and their requirements on multidisciplinary activities (Article 25(2)).
Morebitne prednosti tega postopka je treba še natančno preučiti, kajti upravne zahteve ter stroški v zvezi s tem bodo po mnenju poročevalke še vedno ostali.
The possible advantages of this procedure still need examining closely, as the additional bureaucratic demands and the consequent administrative cost will in the rapporteur’s view continue to exist.
MNENJE OdborA za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
o izvajanju direktive o storitvah (2006/123/ES)
on the implementation of the Services Directive 2006/123/EC
Pripravljavka mnenja: Sophie Auconie
Rapporteur: Sophie Auconie
A. ker je svoboda opravljanja storitev zapisana v temeljnih pogodbah,
A. whereas the freedom to provide services is enshrined in the Treaties,
1. poudarja, da je direktiva o storitvah bistveni korak k pravemu enotnemu trgu za storitve, ki bi moral podjetjem, zlasti malim in srednjim, omogočiti, da bi državljanom zagotavljala boljše storitve po konkurenčnih cenah po vsem notranjem trgu; vendar meni, da je po popolnem prenosu direktive o storitvah bistveno, da se opravi celovita ocena o njenem učinku na gospodarske dejavnosti, kvalitativne in kvantitativne ravni zaposlovanja, socialno varstvo, izpolnitev okoljskih ciljev ter kakovost storitev za potrošnike;
Emphasises that the Services Directive is an essential step towards a true single market for services, which should enable enterprises, and SMEs in particular, to provide citizens with better services at a competitive price throughout the internal market; considers, however, that after full transposition it is crucial that a comprehensive assessment should be carried out of the impact of the Services Directive on economic activity, qualitative and quantitative levels of employment, social protection, fulfilment of environmental objectives and the quality of services offered to consumers;
3. ugotavlja, da je težko opredeliti področje uporabe direktive o storitvah, zlasti glede storitev splošnega pomena; zato poziva Komisijo, naj z aktom za enotni trg zagotovi jasno pravno okolje za vse storitve;
Notes that defining the scope of the Services Directive can be difficult, in particular as regards Services of General Interest; therefore asks the Commission to guarantee a clear legal environment for all services through the Single Market Act;
o izvajanju direktive o storitvah (2006/123/ES)
on the implementation of the Services Directive (2006/123/EC)
A. ker se mora notranji trg storitev popolnoma razviti, ob tem pa v celoti ohraniti evropski socialni model, zlasti dostojna in varna delovna mesta ter splošne sisteme socialnega varstva,
A. whereas the internal services market must develop fully whilst preserving the European social model intact, especially with regard to decent and secure employment and universal welfare,
B. ker direktiva o storitvah predvsem samozaposlenim ter malim in srednjim podjetjem bistveno olajša opravljanje njihovih dejavnosti tudi v drugih državah članicah, razvoj novih poslovnih področij ter zaposlovanje novega osebja,
B. whereas the Services Directive makes it significantly easier for self-employed persons and small and medium-sized companies in particular to pursue their activities, develop new areas of business and also recruit new staff in other Member States,
C. ker je izvajanje direktive o storitvah še vedno odločilno vprašanje za dokončno oblikovanje enotnega trga,
C. whereas implementation of the Services Directive remains crucially important for completing the single market,
D. ker storitve pomenijo 70 % delovnih mest in BDP v Evropski uniji, torej so največji sektor evropskega gospodarstva, v zadnjih desetih letih pa so bila ob porastu povpraševanja v storitvenem sektorju v večini držav območja evra ustvarjena neto delovna mesta,
D. whereas the services sector accounts for 70% of jobs and GDP in the European Union and is thus the largest sector of the EU economy, and whereas over the past decade rising demand has led to net job creation in the services sector in most of the euro area,
E. ker bi lahko bolj dinamičen in delovno intenziven storitveni sektor prispeval k ohranjanju rasti,
E. whereas a more dynamic and labour-intensive service sector could help sustain growth,
4. opozarja, da je treba to direktivo razlagati ob upoštevanju novih temeljnih določb, zlasti člena 3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, horizontalne socialne klavzule člena 9 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, njenega člena 14, protokola št. 26, ki je priložen temeljnim pogodbam, ter listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah;
Recalls that the Services Directive must be interpreted in the light of the new Treaty provisions, in particular Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union, the horizontal social clause in Article 9 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Article 14 TFEU, Protocol No 26 annexed to the Treaties, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;