natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Novi dodatni raziskovalni program o delovanju reaktorja z visokim pretokom v Pettenu (HFR) je bil sprejet za obdobje treh let in se bo začel 1. januarja 2009.
The new supplementary research programme on the operation of the high flux reactor at Petten (HFR) has been adopted for a period of three years, starting on 1 January 2009.
Med proračunskim postopkom za leto 2009 ni bilo mogoče predvideti, kdaj bo ta sklep sprejet, in za ta namen ni bila v letu 2009 predvidena nobena proračunska postavka.
It was not possible at the time of the 2009 budget procedure to foresee the timing of this decision and no budgetary item was included for it in 2009.
V skladu s potekom pogajanj je bilo mogoče načrtovati program v predhodnem predlogu proračuna 2010.
With the evolution of the negotiation, it was possible to plan for this programme in the 2010 PDB.
Vendar ga je treba sedaj upoštevati za leto 2009.
Nevertheless, it has now to be taken into account for 2009.
V dodatnemu programu je navedeno, da bodo sredstva prispevale tri sodelujoče države članice, in sicer Nizozemska, Francija in Belgija, kot finančni prispevek v splošni proračun Evropske unije v obliki namenskih prejemkov.
In this supplementary programme it is indicated that the contribution will come from three participating Member States, namely The Netherlands, France and Belgium, as the financial contributions made to the general budget of the European Union by way of assigned revenue.
Komisija ne bo prispevala k stroškom delovanja HFR s sredstvi iz svojega proračuna.
The Commission will not contribute to the operational cost of the HFR with funds from its budget.
Vendar mora oblikovati "vstopno točko" za ta program z oznako "p.m." v novi proračunski postavki 10 04 04 02 "Delovanje reaktorja z visokim pretokom (HFR) – dodatni programi HFR (2009 do 2011)".
However, the Commission needs to create an "entry point" for this programme with a token entry "p.m." on the new budget item 10 04 04 02 Operation of the high-flux reactor (HFR) — Supplementary HFR programmes (2009 to 2011).
Poročevalka ob upoštevanju virov financiranja podpira to točko predlagane spremembe proračuna.
Considering the source of the funding, the Rapporteur is in favour of this item of the DAB.
EUROPOL: vzpostavitev proračunske postavke 18 05 02 03 "Evropski policijski urad – prehodni stroški".
EUROPOL Creation of budget item 18 05 02 03 European Police Office transition costs.
Za postavko bo dodeljen znesek 1.250.000 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil.
This item will be endowed with an amount of EUR 1 250 000 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Sredstva se bodo prerazporedila iz proračunskega člena 18 05 09 "Preprečevanje kriminala in boj proti njemu".
These appropriations will be redeployed from budget article 18 05 09 Prevention of and fight against crime.
V skladu z odstavkom 5 člena 60 sklepa Sveta
According to article 60, paragraph 5 of the Decision of the Council
Del prehodnih stroškov Europola za pripravo novega finančnega okvira od leta pred prvim proračunskim letom po dnevu začetka uporabe tega sklepa krije splošni proračun Evropske unije.
A proportion of the transition costs incurred by Europol to prepare for the new financial framework from the year preceding the first budgetary year following the date of application of this Decision shall be borne by the general budget of the European Union.
Financiranje teh stroškov ima lahko obliko donacije Skupnosti." o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (EUROPOL) se iz proračuna Unije za leto 2009 financira del prehodnih stroškov preoblikovanja urada EUROPOL v popolnoma decentralizirano agencijo EU.
The financing of those costs may take the form of a Community grant." establishing the European Police Office (Europol), the Union's budget of 2009 shall finance part of the transitional costs of the transformation of EUROPOL in a fully EU decentralised agency.
Komisija predlaga, da se znesek 1.250.000 EUR od celotnega zneska 1.337.000 EUR financira s spremembo proračuna št. 8/2009.
The Commission proposes that EUR 1 250 000 out of a total of EUR 1 337 000 be financed via AB 8/2009.
Komisija je poročevalki predložila dodatne obrazložitve glede prehodnih izdatkov, ki bodo financirani z evropskim proračunom.
The Commission provided the Rapporteur with further explanations concerning the transitional expenses that will be financed via the European Budget.
Glej Prilogo I: Povzetek zaključkov tristranskih pogovorov z dne 1. septembra 2009. .
See annex I: Summary of conclusions of the trialogue of 1st September 2009 .
Poročevalka se zato strinja s to postavko predloga spremembe proračuna št. 8/2009.
The rapporteur therefore agrees with this item of DAB 8/2009.
EUROJUST: povečanje subvencije Skupnosti za urad EUROJUST v višini 3.900.000 EUR; od tega se predlaga kritje zneska v višini 1.600.000 EUR z namenskimi prejemki, ki izhajajo iz presežka urada EUROJUST za proračunsko leto 2008.
EUROJUST Reinforcement of the Community subsidy to EUROJUST by EUR 3 900 000, of which it is proposed that EUR 1 600 000 be covered by assigned revenue stemming from the recovery of the EUROJUST surplus for the financial year 2008.
Komisija predlaga povečanje subvencije za urad EUROJUST v višini 3,9 milijona EUR, da bi odgovorili na nove potrebe, s katerimi se sooča agencija:
The Commission proposes to increase the subsidy to EUROJUST by EUR 3,9 millions, in order to respond to new needs that the agency is facing in what concerns
- povečanje osebja (1,24 milijona EUR),
- staff increase (EUR 1,24 millions),
- potrebe na področju stavb/varnosti, ki so posledica selitve v novo stavbo – HV1 (1,75 milijona EUR), ter
- building/security needs stemming from the move to a new building - HV1 (EUR 1,75 millions), and
- operativne potrebe, ki so posledica povečanja dejavnosti agencije (0,91 milijona EUR).
- operational needs stemming from the increase of its activities (EUR 0,91 millions).
Komisija meni, da se 1,6 milijona EUR lahko financira z namenskimi prejemki, kar pomeni, da ostane le 2,3 milijona EUR za financiranje iz novih odobritev (1,39 milijona EUR za 18 06 04 01 – subvencija iz naslovov 1 in 2, ter 0,91 milijona EUR za 18 06 04 02 – subvencija iz naslova 3).
The Commission considers that EUR 1,6 millions can be financed via assigned revenues, which leaves only EUR 2,3 millions to be finances by fresh appropriations (EUR 1,39 millions for 18 06 04 01 - Subsidy under titles 1 and 2, and EUR 0,91 millions for 18 06 04 02 - Subsidy under Title 3).
Ta znesek se bo financiral iz rezerve v razdelku 3a.
This amount will be financed under the margin available in Heading 3a.
Odobritve plačil bodo v celoti financirane s prerazporeditvijo sredstev iz člena 18 06 07 "Program za civilno pravosodje".
The payments appropriations will be totally financed by redeployment from article 18 06 07 Civil Justice programme.
Poročevalka ob upoštevanju okoliščin podpira to postavko predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna.
The Rapporteur does, under these circumstances, agree with this item of the PDAB.
OLAF – predlagani spremenjeni kadrovski načrt predvideva dodelitev 12 dodatnih stalnih delovnih mest AD11 brez finančnega kritja, kar pomeni zmanjšanje enakovrednega števila začasnih delovnih mest AD11 v kadrovskem načrtu OLAF v PPP 2010.
OLAF - The proposed modified establishment plan implies the allocation of 12 additional AD11 permanent posts without financial provisions which does already result in the reduction of the equivalent number of AD11 temporary posts from OLAF's establishment plan in the PDB 2010.
Poročevalka podpira to prilagoditev kadrovskega načrta OLAF.
The rapporteur is in favour of this adaption in the establishment plan of OLAF.
Povzetek sklepov
Summary of conclusions
V skladu s točko 47 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 so se Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija sporazumeli, da:
In accordance with Point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 17 May 2006, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agree on the following:
- na podlagi informacij, ki jih je posredovala Komisija v svojem finančnem načrtovanju, Evropski parlament in Svet ugotavljata, se lahko financiranje urada EUROPOL kot agencije Skupnosti zagotovi z dogovorjeno zgornjo mejo odhodkov podrazdelka 3a večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2007-2013; letni znesek bo določen v vsakemu letnemu proračunskemu postopku.
- on the basis of the information transmitted by the Commission in its financial programming, the European Parliament and the Council note that the financing of Europol as a Community agency can be secured within the agreed expenditure ceiling of sub-heading 3a of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the period 2007-2013; the annual amount will be decided in the framework of each annual budgetary procedure;
- na podlagi predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna št. 8/2009, ki ga je predložila Komisija, Evropski parlament in Svet sprejemata prehodne stroške v višini 1.250 milijonov EUR leta 2009, ki se krijejo s prerazporeditvijo v podrazdelku 3a večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2007-2013;
- on the basis of preliminary draft amending budget No. 8/2009 presented by the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council accept the transition costs of EUR 1.250 million in the year 2009, covered by redeployments within sub-heading 3a of the MFF 2007-2013;
- Evropski parlament in Svet pozivata Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži osnutek skupnih smernic za izvajanje točke 47 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
- the European Parliament and the Council ask the Commission to present as quickly as possible draft common guidelines to implement Point 47 of the IIA.
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 8/2009 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009: Europol, Eurojust, OLAF
Draft amending budget No 8/2009 of the European Union for the financial year 2009, Europol, Eurojust, OLAF
o pobudi Češke republike, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije, Slovaške republike in Kraljevine Švedske za sprejetje Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2009/…/PNZ o preprečevanju in reševanju sporov o izvajanju pristojnosti v kazenskih postopkih
on the initiative of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and of the Kingdom of Sweden for adoption of a Council framework decision 2009/.../JHA on prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings
– ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Češke, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije, Republike Slovaške in Kraljevine Švedske (8535/2009),
– having regard to the initiative of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and of the Kingdom of Sweden (8535/2009),
– ob upoštevanju členov 39(1) in 34(2)(b) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0205/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) and Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7-0205/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 100 in 55 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 100 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
1. odobri pobudo Republike Češke, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije, Republike Slovaške in Kraljevine Švedske, kakor je bila spremenjena;
Approves the initiative of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and of the Kingdom of Sweden as amended;
Pod temi pogoji se zavezuje, da bo vse nadaljnje predloge obravnaval po nujnem postopku;
This being the case is committed to considering any further proposal by urgent procedure.
Pobuda Češke republike, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije, Slovaške republike in Kraljevine Švedske
Initiative of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and of the Kingdom of Sweden
(4) Obstajati bi moralo neposredno posvetovanje med pristojnimi organi držav članic, z namenom doseči soglasje o učinkoviti rešitvi, da bi se izognili škodljivim posledicam vzporednih postopkov in izgubi časa ter sredstev zadevnih pristojnih organov .
(4) There should be direct consultations between competent authorities of the Member States with the aim of achieving a consensus on any effective solution aimed at avoiding the adverse consequences arising from parallel proceedings and avoiding waste of time and resources of the competent authorities concerned.
Taka učinkovita rešitev bi lahko predstavljala koncentracijo kazenskih postopkov v eni državi članici, na primer s prenosom kazenskih postopkov.
Such effective solution could notably consist in the concentration of the criminal proceedings in one Member State, for example through the transfer of criminal proceedings.
Lahko bi tudi predstavljala katerikoli drug korak, ki bi omogočal učinkovito in razumno vodenje postopka, tudi glede časovne dodelitve postopka , kot na primer odstop zadeve Eurojustu, v primeru, da pristojni organi ne morejo doseči soglasja .
It could also consist in any other step allowing efficient and reasonable handling of those proceedings, including concerning the allocation in time, for example through a referral of the case to Eurojust when the competent authorities are not able to reach consensus .
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba posebno pozornost nameniti vprašanju zbiranja dokazov, na kar lahko vpliva vodenje vzporednih postopkov.
In this respect, specific attention should be paid to the issue of gathering the evidence which can be influenced by the parallel proceedings being conducted.
Lahko bi tudi predstavljala katerikoli drug korak, ki bi omogočal učinkovito in razumno vodenje postopka, tudi glede časovne dodelitve postopka.
It could also consist in any other step allowing efficient and reasonable handling of those proceedings, including concerning the allocation in time.
Odstop zadeve Eurojustu ne bi smel biti na izbiro ali zadnja možnost.
The referral of the case to Eurojust should not be a choice or a last resource.
(7) Splošna obveznost pristojnega organa , s katerim je pristojni organ druge države članice vzpostavil stik, bi morala biti, da odgovori na zaprosilo.
(7) A competent authority which has been contacted by a competent authority of another Member State should have a general obligation to reply to the request submitted.
Organ, ki prvi vzpostavi stik, se vzpodbudi, da določi rok, v katerem bi moral organ, s katerim je vzpostavljen stik, odgovoriti.
The contacting authority is encouraged to set a deadline within which the contacted authority should respond, if possible.
Med celotnim postopkom vzpostavljanja stika bi moral pristojni organi v celoti upoštevati primere, kjer je v postopku osebi odvzeta prostost.
The specific situation of a person deprived of liberty should be fully taken into account by the competent authorities throughout the procedure of taking contact.
(7) Pristojni organ , s katerim je pristojni organ druge države članice vzpostavil stik, bi moral odgovoriti na zaprosilo do določenega roka .
(7) A competent authority which has been contacted by a competent authority of another Member State should reply to the request submitted by the deadline set .
Odgovor pristojnega organa, s katerim je bil vzpostavljen stik, se ne bi smel šteti kot „splošna obveznost“, temveč kot obvezna dolžnost.
The reply by contacted competent authority should not be intended as a "general obligation" but rather as a mandatory duty.
V okvirnem sklepu mora biti za to določen rok.
A deadline to this purpose must be set by the framework decision.
(8) Vzpostavitev neposrednega stika med pristojnimi organi bi moral o biti vodilno načelo sodelovanja v okviru okvirnega sklepa.
(8) Direct contact between competent authorities should be the leading principle of cooperation established under this Framework Decision.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da se odločijo, kateri organi so pristojni za ukrepanje v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom, ob upoštevanju načela nacionalne postopkovne neodvisnosti, če so ti organi pristojni za posredovanje in odločanje v skladu z njegovimi določbami.
Member States should have discretion to decide which authorities are competent to act in accordance with this Framework Decision, in compliance with the principle of national procedural autonomy, provided that such authorities have competence to intervene and decide accordingly with its provisions.
(8) Vzpostavitev neposrednega stika med pristojnimi organi in vključitev Eurojusta bi morali biti vodilni načeli sodelovanja v okviru okvirnega sklepa.
(8) Direct contact between competent authorities and the involvement of Eurojust should be the leading principles of cooperation established under this Framework Decision.
Eurojust bi moral prevzeti vodilno vlogo, s katero se odraža položaj, ki mu pripada na podlagi Sklep Sveta 2009/426/PNZ.
Eurojust should be given a leading role reflecting the position resulting from Council Decision 2009/426/JHA.
Zaradi pomembnosti sodnih pristojnosti, o katerih se odloča v tem kontekstu, bi bilo treba kot pristojne organe šteti le sodne organe.
Due to the relevance of jurisdiction issues, which are at stake in this context, only judicial authorities should be considered as competent authorities.
(9) Pristojni organi bi morali pri prizadevanjih za doseganje soglasja o učinkoviti rešitvi, da bi se izognili škodljivim posledicam vzporednih postopkov v dveh ali več državah članicah, upoštevati, da je vsak primer specifičen in bi morali preučiti vsa dejstva in dokaze v zvezi z njim.
(9) When striving to reach consensus on any effective solution aimed at avoiding the adverse consequences arising from parallel proceedings being conducted in two or more Member States, the competent authorities should take into account that each case is specific and give consideration to all its facts and merits.
Da bi se doseglo soglasje, bi morali pristojni organi upoštevati ustrezna merila, med katerimi so lahko merila, opredeljena v smernicah, ki so bile objavljene v letnem poročilu Eurojusta za leto 2003 in so bile oblikovane za potrebe strokovnih delavcev, ter upoštevati na primer kraj, kjer se je zgodil večji del kaznivega dejanja, kraj, kjer je nastalo največ škode, kraj, kjer se nahaja osumljena oziroma obtožena oseba in možnosti, da se doseže njihova predaja ali izročitev drugim sodnim oblastem, državljanstvo ali prebivališče osumljene ali obtožene osebe, pomembni interesi osumljene ali obtožene osebe, pomembni interesi žrtev in prič, dopustnost dokazov ali kakršna koli zamuda, ki bi lahko nastala.
In order to reach consensus, the competent authorities should consider relevant criteria, which may include those set out in the Guidelines which were published in the Eurojust Annual Report 2003 and which were drawn up for the needs of practitioners, and take into account for example the place where the major part of the criminality occurred, the place where the majority of the loss was sustained, the location of the suspected or accused person and possibilities for securing its surrender or extradition to other jurisdictions, the nationality or residence of the suspected or accused person, significant interests of the suspected or accused person, significant interests of victims and witnesses, the admissibility of evidence or any delays that may occur.
Merila za določitev sodne pristojnosti bi morala biti jasno določena in bolje vključena v besedilo okvirnega sklepa, ne pa zgolj v uvodno izjavo.
Criteria to set jurisdiction should be clearly set and be better inserted in the body of the Framework decision rather then in a Recital.
(16) Ta okvirni sklep ne bi smel povzročiti nepotrebne birokracije, kadar so na voljo ustreznejše alternativne možnosti.
(16) This Framework Decision should not lead to undue bureaucracy in cases where for the problems addressed more suitable options are readily available.
V primerih, za katere so med državami članicami na voljo prožnejši instrumenti ali ureditve, bi morali imeti slednji prednost pred tem okvirnim sklepom.
Thus in situations where more flexible instruments or arrangements are in place between Member States, those should prevail over this Framework Decision.
V primerih, za katere so med državami članicami na voljo prožnejši instrumenti ali ureditve, bi morali ti imeti prednost pred tem okvirnim sklepom , pod pogojem, da ne zmanjšujejo zaščite , ki se nudi osumljen i ali obtožen i oseb i .
Thus in situations where more flexible instruments or arrangements are in place between Member States, those should prevail over this Framework Decision provided that they do not lower the protection afforded to the suspect ed or accused person .
Poročevalka meni, da bi bilo treba posvetiti največjo pozornost zaščiti osumljenca in obtoženca.
It is the opinion of the rapporteur that the protection of the suspect and the accused must receive the highest attention.
(18) Okvirni sklep Sveta 2008/977/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, bi se moral uporabljati za varstvo osebnih podatkov, ki se zagotavljajo v okviru tega okvirnega sklepa.
(18) Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters should apply to the processing of personal data exchanged under this Framework Decision.
Prenos podatkov, ki se nanašajo na tako imenovano rasno ali narodnostno poreklo, ver o ali prepričanje ter spolno usmerjenost , je izrecno prepovedan;
The transmission of information relat ing to so-called racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief and sexual orientation is expressly prohibited;
(20) Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in odražena v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije −
(20) This Framework Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
(20) Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in odražena v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije , zlasti v členu 50 te listine .
(20) This Framework Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union with particular regard to Article 50 thereof ,
Končni cilj preprečevanja in reševanja sporov o pristojnosti je preprečiti, da se osebam sodi dvakrat za isto dejanje in torej preprečiti primere ne bis in idem.
The final goal of preventing and solving conflicts of jurisdiction is to avoid that persons are trialed twice for the same facts and therefore to avoid ne bis in idem cases.
(b) "pristojni organ" pomeni sodni organ ali drug organ, ki je po zakonodaji svoje države članice pristojen za opravljanje dejanj, predvidenih v členu 2(1) tega okvirnega sklepa;
(b) "competent authority" means a judicial authority or another authority, which is competent, under the law of its Member State, to carry out the acts envisaged by Article 2(1) of this Framework Decision;
(b) "pristojni organ" pomeni sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali državni tožilec ali drug sodni organ, ki je po zakonodaji svoje države članice pristojen za opravljanje dejanj, predvidenih v členu 2(1) tega okvirnega sklepa;
(b) "competent authority" means a judge, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor or another judicial authority, which is competent, under the law of its Member State, to carry out the acts envisaged by Article 2(1) of this Framework Decision;
Zadeve v zvezi s pristojnostjo bi morali obravnavati pravosodni organi, kar pomeni sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali državni tožilec.
Any matter concerning jurisdiction should be dealt with by judicial authorities, meaning a judge, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor.
V skladu s sklepom o Eurojustu organ, ki vzpostavi stik, o tem istočasno obvesti Eurojust.
In accordance with the Eurojust Decision, the contacting authority shall at the same time inform Eurojust.
Eurojust bi moral biti, glede na svojo vlogo koordinatorja, vključen v najzgodnejši fazi.
Due to its coordinating role, Eurojust should be involved in the earliest stage.