natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
32. poziva, da se v pravne instrumente sistematično vključijo jasna in posebna merila uspešnosti kot pogoji za odpravo sankcij; vztraja zlasti, da se referenčna merila oblikujejo na podlagi neodvisne strokovne ocene in da se kasneje ne spreminjajo glede na politične spremembe znotraj Sveta;
Calls for the systematic inclusion in the legal instruments of clear and specific benchmarks as conditions for the lifting of the sanctions; insists, in particular, that the reference criteria should be established on the basis of an independent evaluation and that those criteria should not be altered at a later stage, depending on political changes within the Council;
34. meni, da embargo na orožje proti Kitajski kaže skladnost in doslednost EU, saj je bil ta embargo uveden po pokolu v Tiananmenu leta 1989, in da ni razloga za njegovo odpravo, ker EU do zdaj ni prejela nobenih pojasnil o pokolu;
Believes that the arms embargo imposed on China is an illustration of EU coherence and consistency, given that this embargo was originally established following the 1989 Tiananmen massacre and the EU has not received to date any explanations about that massacre, and that there is therefore no reason to lift this embargo;
36. priznava, da so države članice ter mednarodne in regionalne organizacije odgovorne za mednarodno nezakonita dejanja pri izvajanju sankcij, ter v zvezi s tem poudarja potrebo po sodnem mehanizmu, ki bi zagotavljal skladnost z mednarodnim in humanitarnim pravom;
Recognises that states as well as international and regional organisations should be accountable for internationally wrongful acts in the implementation of sanctions and stresses in this regard the need for a judicial mechanism with a view to guaranteeing conformity with international law and humanitarian law;
38. obžaluje, da ni mogoče presojati učinkovitosti ciljnih ukrepov, ker se ne izvaja ocenjevanje; kljub temu priznava, da je velika humanitarna skrb EU, ki je povzročila opustitev sankcij splošnega gospodarskega obsega, kot je že storila v primeru Iraka, in uvedbo bolj ciljno usmerjenih „pametnih“ sankcij, povezanih z doseganjem čim večjega učinka na tiste, na katerih vedenje želijo vplivati, pri čemer so čim manjši škodljivi humanitarni učinki ali negativne posledice za ljudi, na katere sankcije niso usmerjene, ali na sosednje države;
Deplores the fact that, owing to a lack of evaluation, it is impossible to assess the effectiveness of targeted measures; recognises, however, the EU’s strong humanitarian concern, which has led to the abandonment of sanctions of general economic scope, as previously done in the case of Iraq, and to the imposition of more targeted, ‘smart’ sanctions, geared to achieving the maximum impact on those whose behaviour it wants to influence while minimising adverse humanitarian effects or consequences for persons not targeted or neighbouring countries;
40. poudarja, da bi morale biti vsakršne gospodarske sankcije usmerjene predvsem na tiste sektorje, v katerih je zaposlitvena intenzivnost nizka in imajo omejen pomen za mala in srednja podjetja, ki so pomembna za gospodarski razvoj in prerazporeditev dohodka;
Emphasises that any economic sanctions should first and foremost target those sectors which are not employment-intensive and are of limited relevance for small and medium-sized enterprises, which are important both for economic development and for redistribution of income;
42. meni, da morajo gospodarske in finančne sankcije, tudi če so ciljno usmerjene, izvajati vse fizične in pravne osebe, ki opravljajo gospodarske dejavnosti v EU, vključno z evropskimi državljani ali pravnimi osebami, registriranimi ali ustanovljenimi v skladu z zakonodajo države članice EU, ki opravlja gospodarsko dejavnost izven EU;
Considers that economic and financial sanctions, even when they are targeted, must be applied by all natural and legal persons pursuing commercial activities in the EU, including citizens of third countries, and European citizens or legal persons registered or established in accordance with the legislation of an EU Member State who pursue commercial activities outside the EU;
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/60/ES z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema za pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma (UL L 309, 25.11.2005, str.
Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p.
15). ; predlaga, da vsaka država članica imenuje eno institucijo, odgovorno za razširjanje teh podatkov;
15). ; proposes that each Member State designate one institution responsible for disseminating this information;
46. poziva Svet in Komisijo, da preučita možnosti in načine za konstruktivno uporabo zamrznjenih dohodkov ciljnih organov, na primer z dodelitvijo teh sredstev v razvojne namene;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to investigate the possibilities and ways of using frozen income of targeted authorities in a constructive manner, for example by allocating them for development purposes;
54. opozarja, da je obveznost držav članic EU, da pripravijo sankcije v skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki obvezuje Unijo k spoštovanju temeljnih pravic, kot jih zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter kot izhajajo iz skupnih ustavnih tradicij držav članic; poudarja, da so obstoječi postopki uvrščanja na črne sezname na ravni EU in ZN z vidika pravne varnosti in pravnih sredstev pomanjkljivi;
Recalls the obligation of EU Member States to draft sanctions in compliance with Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, which requires the Union to respect fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States; stresses that the present blacklisting procedures at both the EU and the UN levels are deficient from the perspective of legal security and legal remedies;
56. meni, da bo člen 75 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, kot jo uvaja lizbonska pogodba, priložnost, ki jo mora Evropski parlament izkoristiti, da se odpravijo pomanjkljivosti sedanje prakse, ter podpira vse potekajoče parlamentarno delo, ki bo vključeno na dnevni red zakonodajnega programa za leto 2009;
Considers that Article 75 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, would be an opportunity to be seized by the European Parliament in order to remedy the shortcomings in current practice, and supports all the current parliamentary work aimed at being included on the agenda for the 2009 legislative programme;
59. poudarja, da terorizem ogroža varnost in svobodo ter zato Svet poziva, naj pregleda in posodobi seznam terorističnih organizacij ob upoštevanju njihovih dejavnosti na vseh celinah;
Stresses that terrorism is a threat to safety and freedom, and therefore urges the Council to review and update the list of terrorist organisations, taking into account their activities on all continents;
Za raznovrstno politiko na področju sankcij
A varied sanctions policy
63. poziva Svet in Komisijo, da izkoristita priložnost, ki jo nudita ratifikacija lizbonske pogodbe in naknadna ustanovitev Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje, da se zagotovi kar največja skladnost različnih instrumentov zunanjega delovanja EU kot ključnega elementa nadaljnje učinkovitosti politike sankcij;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to seize the opportunity provided by the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty and the subsequent creation of the European External Action Service to guarantee optimum consistency in the EU’s various external action instruments as a key element of the further efficiency of sanctions policy;
Priporočila v zvezi z institucijami EU in njenimi državami članicami
Recommendations in relation to the EU institutions and Member States
V okviru Skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) EU uporablja omejevalne ukrepe, tj. sankcije, katerih cilj je zagotoviti spoštovanje človekovih pravic, demokracije in pravne države
In the context of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), the EU applies restrictive measures, or sanctions, to ensure compliance with the CFSP objectives, in particular respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law
Člen 11 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji. .
Article 11 of the TEU. .
Varnostni svet Združenih narodov lahko naloži sankcije, če oceni, da gre za take razmere, ki predstavljajo grožnjo miru in mednarodni stabilnosti.
The UNSC may impose sanctions in the event of situations which it considers to pose a threat to world peace and stability.
EU se lahko neodvisno odloči, da svojo politiko sankcij uporabi za doseganje širših ciljev.
The EU may independently choose to bring its sanctions policy to bear in pursuit of broader objectives.
Praksa je pokazala, da to počne, čeprav tudi na splošno (vendar ne izključno) uporablja avtonomne sankcije, kadar delovanje Varnostnega sveta ni primerno ali ni mogoče.
Experience shows that it does so, although as a rule it applies autonomous sanctions where it is not appropriate or possible for the Security Council to do so.
Sankcije so sestavni del SZVP in natančneje politike ZN v prid človekovim pravicam.
Sanctions form an integral part of the CFSP system and, more specifically, of UN human rights policy.
Čeprav doslej ni pravne in uradne opredelitve sankcij v okviru SZVP, se omejevalni ukrepi dejansko lahko razumejo kot „diplomatski ali gospodarski instrument, s katerim se želi spremeniti dejavnosti ali politike, ki kršijo mednarodno pravo ali človekove pravice, ali politike, ki niso v skladu s pravno državo ali načeli demokracije“
Although there is to date no legal and official definition of sanctions within the CFSP, restrictive measures under the CFSP may be considered as ‘ an instrument of a diplomatic or economic nature which seeks to bring about a change in activities or policies such as violations of international law or human rights, or policies that do not respect the rule of law or democratic principles ’
Treba je bilo dočakati leto 2003 ter objavo „Smernic za izvajanje in ocenjevanje omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij) v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike EU“ ter „Osnovnih načel o uporabi omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij)“, da se je izraz „sankcije“ pojavil v uradnem dokumentu poleg milejših izrazov „omejevalni“ in „negativni ukrepi“.
It was not until 2003, and the publication of the ‘Guidelines on implementation and evaluation of restrictive measures (sanctions) in the framework of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy’, followed by the June 2004, ‘Basic Principles on the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)’, that the term ‘sanctions’ appeared in official texts, alongside the less threatening ‘restrictive’ or ‘negative’ measures.
Čeprav se v praksi „avtonomne“ sankcije, tj. sankcije, ki jih EU določi v odsotnosti mandata ZN, uporabljajo že 20 let, so sorazmerno slabo poznan instrument in priznati je treba, da so z njegovo učinkovitostjo povezani nekateri dvomi in da se ga malo uporablja.
Although the practice of ‘autonomous’ EU sanctions, i.e. sanctions introduced in the absence of a UN mandate, has been in existence for more than 20 years, they are a relatively unknown instrument and - it must be admitted - some scepticism as to their effectiveness and a certain reluctance to use them.
Politična učinkovitost sankcij in njihovi škodljivi stranski učinki so danes precej sporna tema (trpljenje prebivalstva zaradi uvedbe neupravičeno obsežnih sankcij, kot je embargo (Irak), pospeševanje kriminalnih združb, črnih trgov z nekaterimi proizvodi (Burma), nevarnost kršitev človekovih pravic pri uvrščanju na „črni seznam“).
The political effectiveness of sanctions and their harmful side-effects are now the subject of much controversy (the suffering of populations as a result of unduly extensive sanctions, such as embargos (Iraq), encouragement to criminal networks, black markets in certain products (Burma) and the danger of human rights violations in the blacklisting method).
Tudi kritike o uporabi dvojnih meril zaradi strateškega pomena partnerja (Rusija), politična razhajanja znotraj Sveta (Izrael, Kuba) ali geografski položaj spodkopavajo njegovo verodostojnost.
Similarly, criticisms regarding the application of double standards, based on the strategic importance of the partner (Russia), political differences within the Council (Israel, Cuba) and geographical location, tend to undermine its credibility.
Če so te kritike utemeljene, ne smejo biti argument za popolno opustitev tega instrumenta, ampak morajo biti upoštevane pri njegovi izboljšavi.
While such criticisms are justified, they cannot be used as an argument to simply abandon the instrument but should be taken into account in seeking to improve it.
Cilj tega poročila mora biti oblikovanje priporočil za pregledno, skladno in učinkovito politiko sankcij.
The aim of this report is to put forward recommendations with a view to a transparent, consistent and effective sanctions policy.
Evropska unija je nedvomno „mehka moč“, ki namenoma spodbuja pristop, v okviru katerega so sankcije in spodbude tesno povezane v njenem prizadevanju, da združi metodi korenčka in palice.
The European Union is undeniably a ‘soft power’, deliberately promoting an approach where the steps between sanctions and incentives are closely tied in its effort to combine carrot and stick techniques.
Poročilo gospoda Agnoletta o klavzuli o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih Evropske unije in poročilo gospe Valenciano o poteku dialogov in posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah s tretjimi državami sta že obravnavala te vidike politike EU in pokazala v zvezi s tem precejšen potencial teh instrumentov.
The Agnoletto reports on the human rights and democracy clause in European Union agreements and the Valenciano report on the functioning of the human rights dialogues and consultations on human rights with third countries have already addressed these aspects of EU policy and have demonstrated the considerable potential of EU instruments in this connection.
Čeprav se sankcije v okviru SZVP ne smejo zamenjevati z začasno prekinitvijo dvostranskih sporazumov, ki vključujejo klavzulo o človekovih pravicah, morajo biti tako kot klavzule in sporazumi o človekovih pravicah del širše in skladnejše strategije v korist človekovih pravic v sankcioniranih državah.
Although CFSP sanctions should not be confused with the suspension of bilateral agreements containing a human rights clause, they should, along the same lines as human rights clauses and agreements, form part of a wider and more coherent human rights strategy in sanctioned countries.
Sankcije, na primer, ne morejo biti učinkovite, če jih ne spremljajo pozitivni ukrepi za civilno družbo ter pameten, uravnotežen in preudaren začetek dialoga s ciljnimi režimi.
They cannot be effective, for example, unless they are accompanied by positive measures for civil society and a healthy, balanced, clear-sighted and open approach to political dialogue with the relevant regimes.
EU mora še naprej izvajati svojo politiko pametnih, ciljno usmerjenih sankcij, ki so posebej prilagojene posameznim primerom in namenjene doseganju čim večjega učinka na tiste, na katerih vedenje želijo vplivati, pri čemer naj bodo humanitarni učinki ali negativne posledice za ljudi, na katere sankcije niso usmerjene, ali za sosednje države čim manjše.
The EU should pursue its policy of smart, targeted sanctions, specifically adapted to each situation, designed to achieve maximum impact on those whose behaviour it wants to influence while minimising ‘humanitarian effects’ or adverse consequences for persons not targeted or neighbouring countries.
Poleg tega so pri uporabi sankcij potrebna jasna, ustrezna in pogojna merila uspešnosti, ker lahko le ta omogočijo realističen in nepristranski pogled na stanje v zadevni državi ter služijo kot razumljivi cilji, ki jih mora država izpolniti.
Furthermore, clear, relevant and conditional benchmarks are necessary when applying sanctions, as only those can offer a realistic and unbiased view of the situation in the country at question and serve as comprehensible goals the country has to meet.
V zvezi s tem si mora EU prizadevati za izboljšanje svojega strokovnega znanja o sankcijah, izboljšati mora sodelovanje in usklajevanje z ZN ter sprejeti sistematičen vzorčen sistem za pregled sankcij, ki bo zagotovil njihovo čim boljšo uporabo.
In this respect, the EU should work on improving its expertise on sanctions, have an ameliorated cooperation and coordination with the UN and adopt a systematic exemplar review system of sanctions that would ensure their optimal use.
V zvezi s tem je treba oblikovati politiko sankcij, ki bo v celoti skladna z obveznostmi na področju humanitarnosti in človekovih pravic.
In this context, it is essential to design a sanctions policy fully consistent with the humanitarian and human rights commitments.
Kar zadeva uvrščanje na „črni seznam“, ga je treba pregledati, da se zagotovijo pravna varnost in ustrezna pravna sredstva.
As for the procedure for ‘blacklisting’, it should be reviewed in order to offer legal security and appropriate legal remedies.
Jasno je, da je težava sedanje politike sankcij EU premajhna premišljenost.
Evidently, the current EU sanctions policy suffers from excessive ad-hocism.
Sankcije je treba preučevati in obravnavati kot del celostnega pristopa k zunanji politiki, ki vključuje politične izmenjave ter dialoge in posvetovanja o človekovih pravicah.
Sanctions should be considered and treated as part of a comprehensive foreign policy approach which includes political exchange, human rights dialogues and consultations.
Zato je skrajni čas, da se pregledata evropska politika in praksa sankcij ter se instrumenti sankcij prilagodijo novemu varnostnemu okolju, pri čemer se ne smejo izpustiti vprašanja človekovih pravic in možnih kršitev, povezanih s to politiko.
Therefore, it is high time to review the European sanctions policy and practice and adapt the sanctions’ instrument to the new security environment, not omitting the human rights implications and potential violations this policy entails.
o oceni sankcij EU kot dela politik in dejavnosti EU na področju človekovih pravic
on the evaluation of EU sanctions as part of the EU’s actions and policies in the area of human rights
2. poudarja, da je treba v državah, v katerih se izvajajo omejevalni ukrepi EU, humanitarno pomoč zagotavljati strogo v skladu s humanitarnimi načeli, potrjenimi v evropskem soglasju o človekoljubni pomoči (človekoljubnost, nevtralnost, nepristranskost in neodvisnost);
Underlines the fact that, in countries subject to EU restrictive measures, humanitarian aid must be delivered in strict conformity with the humanitarian principles affirmed by the EU Consensus on Humanitarian Aid (i.e. those of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence);
6. meni, da so sankcije učinkovitejše ob navzočnosti mobilizirane demokratične opozicije/civilne družbe, ki podpira proces sprememb v sankcionirani državi;
Considers that s anctions are more effective if there is a mobilised democratic opposition/civil society supporting the process of change within the sanctioned country ;
9. obžaluje, da EU in države članice sankcij ne uporabljajo dosledno; meni, da mora EU znati upravičiti sprejetje ali nesprejetje sankcij, pri čemer se mora opirati predvsem na človekove pravice in argumente učinkovitosti, da bi ohranila verodostojnost in se izognila obtožbam o „dvojnih merilih“;
Deplores the fact that sanctions have not been used consistently by the EU and its Members States; believes that in order to uphold credibility and avoid the accusation of ‘double standards’, the EU must be able to justify the adoption or non-adoption of sanctions, based primarily on human rights grounds and arguments of effectiveness;
11. poudarja, da morata Svet in Komisija za analize pred oblikovanjem sankcij ter oceno sankcij in njihove učinkovitosti nameniti ustrezen čas in sredstva, vključno s strokovnim osebjem na področju človekovih pravic;
Emphasises that sufficient time and resources, including staff specialised in human rights, must be invested by the Council and the Commission for the analyses preceding the design of sanctions and for the evaluation of sanctions and their effectiveness;
14. poudarja, da bi morale biti vsakršne gospodarske sankcije usmerjene predvsem na tiste sektorje, v katerih je zaposlitvena intenzivnost nizka in imajo omejen pomen za mala in srednja podjetja, ki so pomembna za gospodarski razvoj in porazdelitev dohodka.
Emphasises that any economic sanctions should first and foremost target those sectors which are not employment-intensive and are of limited relevance for small and medium-sized enterprises, which are important both for economic development and for redistribution of income.
o oceni sankcij EU kot dela dejavnosti in politik EU na področju človekovih pravic
on the evaluation of EU sanctions as part of the EU’s actions and policies in the area of human rights
3. meni, da je nadvse pomembno vključiti zavezujoče temeljne delovnopravne pravice Mednarodne organizacije dela v vse prihodnje sporazume o prosti trgovini med EU in tretjimi državami;
Believes that it is of the utmost importance to include the binding core labour rights of the International Labour Organization (ILO) in any future Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the European Union and third countries;
6. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj pripravita jasno analizo učinkovitosti sankcij, ki so že bile uvedene, ter vpliva, ki ga imajo na trgovinske odnose EU;
Calls upon the Council and the Commission to draw up a clear analysis of the effectiveness of sanctions which have already been imposed and the influence which they have on the EU’s trade relations;
8. meni, da bi bilo treba sankcije usmeriti tudi proti gospodarskim sektorjem, ki so strateški vir prihodkov za vlade, ki kršijo človekove pravice, in tem vladam omogočajo, da se oklepajo oblasti;
Considers that sanctions should also be targeted at economic sectors which, for governments that violate human rights, constitute a strategic source of revenue which enables those governments to hang on to power;
10. je prepričan, da mora izvajanje in ocena sankcij Evropske unije zaradi kršenja človekovih pravic načeloma prevladati nad morebitno škodo, ki jo zaradi uvedbe sankcij utrpijo trgovinski interesi Evropske unije in njenih državljanov;
Believes that the application and evaluation of sanctions by the European Union for infringements of human rights must in principle prevail over any harm deriving from their application to the trading interests of the European Union and its citizens;
12. meni, da je treba, če je v ocenjevalnem poročilu navedeno, da izvajanje sankcij nima želenega učinka, spremeniti naravo sankcij (na primer zamenjati splošne sankciji s ciljnimi);
Takes the view that if it is stated in the evaluation report that the imposition of sanctions is not having the desired effect, the nature of the sanctions should be changed (e.g. from blanket to targeted);
16. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj ne predlagajo prostotrgovinskih in/ali pridružitvenih sporazumov – četudi vključujejo klavzule o človekovih pravicah – vladam držav, kjer po poročilih Urada visokega komisarja za človekove pravice pri Združenih narodih prihaja do hudih kršitev človekovih pravic;
Urges the Commission and the Member States not to propose FTAs and/or association agreements - even with human rights clauses - to governments of countries where massive human rights violations are being committed, according to reports by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights of the United Nations;
o ukrepih po konferenci iz Montereyja o financiranju razvoja iz leta 2002
on the follow-up to the Monterrey Conference of 2002 on financing for Development
o ukrepih po konferenci iz Monterreyja o financiranju razvoja iz leta 2002
on the follow-up to the Monterrey Conference of 2002 on financing for Development