natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija je pozvana, da v skladu s členom 9b(3) okvirne direktive kot prednostno nalogo sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovi, da države članice dovolijo trgovanje s pravicami do uporabe spektra v Uniji v usklajenih pasovih 790–862 MHz (pas 800 MHz), 880–915 MHz, 925–960 MHz, 1 710–1 785 MHz, 1 805–1 880 MHz, 1 900–1 980 MHz, 2 010–2 025 MHz, 2 110–2 170 MHz, 2,5–2,69 GHz in 3,4–3,8 GHz.
The Commission is invited to adopt, as a priority, appropriate measures, pursuant to Article 9b(3) of the Framework Directive, to ensure that Member States allow trading within the Union of spectrum usage rights in the harmonised bands 790–862 MHz (the "800 MHz band"), 880–915 MHz, 925–960 MHz, 1710–1785 MHz, 1805–1880 MHz, 1900–1980 MHz, 2010–2025 MHz, 2110–2170 MHz, 2.5–2.69 GHz, and 3.4–3.8 GHz.
Komisija za zagotavljanje usklajenih satelitskih storitev za širokopasovni dostop, ki pokrivajo celotno ozemlje Unije, vključno z najbolj odmaknjenimi območji, in ki zagotavljajo dostop do interneta po cenah, primerljivih s ponujenimi prizemnimi storitvami , po potrebi zagotovi razpoložljivost dodatnih spektrskih pasov .
If necessary, the Commission shall ensure the availability of additional spectrum bands for the provision of harmonised satellite services for broadband access that will cover the whole territory of the Union including the most remote areas with a broadband offering enabling Internet access at a comparable price to terrestrial offerings .
Komisija za zagotavljanje usklajenih satelitskih storitev za širokopasovni dostop, ki pokrivajo celotno ozemlje Unije, vključno z najbolj odmaknjenimi območji, in ki zagotavljajo dostop do interneta, po potrebi zagotovi stalno razpoložljivost spektra .
If necessary, the Commission shall ensure the continued availability of spectrum for the provision of harmonised satellite services for broadband access that will cover the whole territory of the Union including the most remote areas with a broadband offering enabling Internet access.
Države članice v sodelovanju s Komisijo ter ob upoštevanju gospodarskih in družbenih koristi notranjega digitalnega trga zagotovijo razpoložljivost spektra za avdiovizualne medijske storitve in zaščitijo radijske frekvence, ki so za to potrebne, da bi podprle prihodnji razvoj inovativnih avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, povezanih zlasti s prehodom na digitalno televizijo.
In order to support the future development of innovative audiovisual media services, and in particular those stemming from the switch to digital television, the Member States shall, in cooperation with the Commission, and in consideration of the economic and social benefits of the internal digital market, ensure spectrum availability for the provision of audiovisual media services and protect the radio frequencies these require.
Komisija po potrebi zagotovi , da se pod usklajenimi pogoji zagotovi dovolj spektra, da se spodbuja razvoj varnostnih storitev in prosti pretok z njimi povezanih naprav ter razvoj inovativnih medobratovalnih rešitev za javno varnost in zaščito, civilno zaščito ter pomoč ob nesrečah.
If necessary, the Commission shall ensure that sufficient spectrum is made available under harmonised conditions to support the development of safety services and the free circulation of related devices as well as the development of innovative interoperable solutions for public safety and protection, civil protection and disaster relief.
Države članice v sodelovanju s Komisijo zagotovijo , da se pod usklajenimi pogoji zagotovi dovolj spektra, da se spodbuja razvoj varnostnih storitev in prosti pretok z njimi povezanih naprav ter razvoj inovativnih medobratovalnih rešitev za javno varnost in zaščito, civilno zaščito ter pomoč ob nesrečah.
In cooperation with the Commission , the Member States shall ensure that sufficient spectrum is made available under harmonised conditions to support the development of safety services and the free circulation of related devices as well as the development of innovative interoperable solutions for public safety and protection, civil protection and disaster relief.
Tisti del spektra, ki se uporablja za radiodifuzijo, pri tem ostane nedotaknjen.
The spectrum used for radio broadcasting shall not be affected.
Inventar in spremljanje obstoječih uporab in novih potreb po spektru
Inventory and monitoring of existing uses of and emerging needs for spectrum
Inventar obstoječih uporab in novih potreb po spektru
Inventory of existing uses of and emerging needs for spectrum
Komisija s pomočjo držav članic, ki zagotovijo vse ustrezne informacije o uporabi spektra, pripravi inventar obstoječe uporabe spektra in morebitnih prihodnjih potreb po spektru v Uniji , zlasti v območju od 300 MHz do 3 GHz.
The Commission, assisted by the Member States , which shall provide all appropriate information on spectrum use, shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum in the Union , in particular in the range from 300 MHz to 3 GHz.
Države članice v okviru nacionalne porazdelitve pristojnosti pripravijo inventar obstoječe uporabe spektra in morebitnih prihodnjih potreb po spektru na svojem ozemlju , zlasti v območju od 300 MHz do 3 GHz.
In keeping with their national systems of competences, the Member States shall create an inventory of existing spectrum use and of possible future needs for spectrum on their respective territories , in particular in the range from 300 MHz to 3 GHz.
Hkrati ocenijo tehnično učinkovitost frekvenc, ki se uporabljajo za nove storitve.
At the same time, the Member States shall assess the technical efficiency of the frequencies used for new services.
Inventar iz prvega odstavka omogoča oceniti tehnično učinkovitost obstoječih uporab spektra ter opredeliti neučinkovite tehnologije in uporabe, neuporabljen ali neučinkovito uporabljen spekter ter priložnosti za skupno uporabo spektra.
The inventory referred to in paragraph ( 1 ) shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities.
Inventar iz prvega odstavka omogoča oceniti tehnično učinkovitost obstoječih uporab spektra ter opredeliti neučinkovite tehnologije in uporabe, neuporabljen ali neučinkovito uporabljen spekter ter priložnosti za skupno uporabo spektra.
The inventory referred to in paragraph 1 shall allow the assessment of the technical efficiency of existing spectrum uses and the identification of inefficient technologies and applications, unused or inefficiently used spectrum and spectrum sharing opportunities.
V primerih, ko uporaba ni optimalna, se sprejmejo potrebni ukrepi za čim učinkovitejšo uporabo.
It shall also be ensured that, where usage is not optimum, the necessary measures are taken in order to maximise efficient use.
V skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Unije, med drugim z načeloma notranje in zunanje pristojnosti, Unija sodeluje v mednarodnih pogajanjih o zadevah, ki se nanašajo na spekter, na katerih zastopa svoje interese.
The Union shall participate in international negotiations relating to spectrum matters to defend its interests, acting in accordance with Union law concerning, among other things, the principles of internal and external competences of the Union .
Države članice zagotovijo, da mednarodni predpisi dovoljujejo popolno uporabo frekvenčnih pasov za namene, za katere so bili določeni z nacionalno zakonodajo in zakonodajo Unije, in da je za sektorske politike Unije zagotovljeno dovolj ustrezno zaščitenega spektra.
Member States shall ensure that international regulations allow the full use of frequency bands for the purposes for which they are designated under national law and Union law, and that a sufficient amount of appropriately protected spectrum is available for Union sectoral policies.
Antonio Cancian, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Francesco De Angelis, Ilda Figueiredo, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Gunnar Hökmark, Yannick Jadot, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Bernd Lange, Werner Langen, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Catherine Trautmann
Antonio Cancian, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Francesco De Angelis, Ilda Figueiredo, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Gunnar Hökmark, Yannick Jadot, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Bernd Lange, Werner Langen, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Catherine Trautmann
o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Luigija de Magistrisa
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Luigi de Magistris
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Luigija de Magistrisa za zaščito njegove imunitete v zvezi s postopkom pred italijanskim sodiščem, ki jo je poslanec vložil 5. julija 2010, na plenarnem zasedanju pa je bila razglašena 7. julija 2010,
– having regard to the request by Luigi de Magistris for defence of his immunity in connection with proceedings pending before an Italian court, as submitted on 5 July 2010 and announced in plenary sitting on 7 July 2010,
– po zaslišanju Luigija de Magistrisa v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Luigi de Magistris, in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju člena 8 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije z dne 8. aprila 1965 in člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Article 8 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union of 8 April 1965, and to Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropske unije z 12. maja 1964, 10. julija 1986, 15. in 21. oktobra 2008 in 19. marca 2010
– having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 12 May 1964, 10 July 1986, 15 and 21 October 2008 and 19 March 2010
Zadeva 101/63 Wagner proti Fohrmann in Krier [1964] ECR 195, zadeva 149/85 Wybot proti Faure in drugi [1986] ECR 2391, zadeva T-345/05 Mote proti Parlamentu [2008] ECR II-2849, združeni zadevi C-200/07 in C-201/07 Marra proti De Gregorio in Clemente [2008] ECR I-7929 in zadeva T-42/06 Gollnisch proti Parlamentu. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and Others [1986] ECR 2391, Case T-345/05 Mote v Parliament [2008] ECR II-2849, Joined Cases C-200/07 and C-201/07 Marra v De Gregorio and Clemente [2008] ECR I-7929, and case T-42/06 Gollnisch v Parliament . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0152/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0152/2011 ),
A. ker je poslanec Evropskega parlamenta Luigi de Magistris zahteval, da se zaščiti njegova poslanska imuniteta v zvezi s postopkom pred italijanskim sodiščem,
A. whereas a Member of the European Parliament, Luigi de Magistris, has requested the defence of his parliamentary immunity in connection with proceedings before an Italian court,
B. ker se zahteva Luigija de Magistrisa navezuje na sodni poziv, ki je bil zoper njega vložen pri sodišču v Beneventu v imenu poslanca Evropskega parlamenta Clementa Maria Mastelle, v zvezi z intervjujem, ki ga je z Luigijem de Magistrisom 31. oktobra 2009 opravil italijanski časopis,
B. whereas the request by Luigi De Magistris relates to a writ of summons filed against him before the Court of Benevento on behalf of Clemente Mario Mastella, a Member of the European Parliament, in connexion with an interview Mr De Magistris gave to an Italian newspaper on 31 October 2009,
C. ker naj bi v skladu s tem pozivom del intervjuja („Mastella je bil vpleten v eno od mojih preiskav in me je poskušal ustaviti“) predstavljal obrekovanje, zaradi česa je vložen odškodninski zahtevek za 1.000.000 EUR in povračilo stroškov,
C. whereas, according to the writ of summons, a fragment of that interview (‘Mastella was implicated in one of my investigations and tried to stop me’) constitutes libel, resulting in a claim for damages of €1 000 000 plus costs,
D. ker je bil intervju opravljen v času, ko je bil Luigi de Magistris poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, saj je bil izvoljen leta 2009 na volitvah v Evropski parlament,
D. whereas the interview was given at a time when Luigi de Magistris was a Member of the European Parliament, after standing successfully in the 2009 European Parliament elections,
E. ker se v skladu s členom 8 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije zoper člana Evropskega parlamenta ne sme začeti preiskava, ne sme biti priprt niti se zoper njega ne sme začeti sodni postopek zaradi mnenja ali glasu, ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti,
E. whereas, in accordance with Article 8 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, Members of the European Parliament may not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties,
F. ker v skladu z ustaljeno prakso Parlamenta dejstvo, da so sodni postopki civilnopravne ali upravnopravne narave ali da vsebujejo vidike, ki sodijo v civilno ali upravno pravo, samo po sebi ne predstavlja ovire za veljavnost imunitete iz tega člena,
F. whereas, in accordance with Parliament’s established practice, the fact that the legal proceedings have been brought under civil or administrative law, or contain certain aspects falling under civil or administrative law, does not per se preclude the application of the immunity afforded by that article,
G. ker je pri dajanju zadevnega intervjuja Luigi de Magistris opravljal svojo dolžnost poslanca Evropskega parlamenta in je opravljal politično dejavnost s tem, da je izražal svoje mnenje o zadevi, ki je za njegove volivce javnega interesa,
G. whereas, in giving the interview in question, Luigi de Magistris was acting in performance of his duties as Member of the European Parliament and carrying out political activities by expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents,
H. ker so poskusi, da se poslancem Evropskega parlamenta prepreči, da izražajo mnenje o zadevah, za katere obstajata legitimni javni interes in zaskrbljenost, ter da kritizirajo svoje politične nasprotnike tako, da se proti njim sproži sodne postopke, v demokratični družbi nesprejemljivi in kršijo člen 8 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije, katerega namen je varovati svobodo izražanja poslancev pri izvrševanju njihovih dolžnosti v interesu Parlamenta kot institucije Evropske unije,
H. whereas attempts to prevent Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern, and from criticising their political opponents, by bringing legal proceedings are unacceptable in a democratic society and represent a breach of Article 8 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, which is intended to protect Members’ freedom of expression when performing their duties in the interests of Parliament as an institution of the European Union,
Na zasedanju 7. julija 2010 je predsednik v skladu s členom 6(3) Poslovnika razglasil, da je 5. julija 2010 prejel zahteva Luigija de Magistrisa v zvezi z zaščito njegove poslanske imunitete v povezavi s členoma 8 in 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske Unije in s sklicevanjem na člen 68 ustave Republike Italije, ki je bil spremenjen z ustavnim zakonom št. 3 z dne 29. oktobra 1993.
At the sitting of 7 July 2010 the President announced, under Rule 6(3) of the Rules of Procedure, that on 5 July 2010 he had received a request from Mr Luigi de Magistris concerning the defence of his parliamentary immunity with reference to Articles 8 and 9 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities of the European Union, with reference to Article 68 of the Constitution of the Italian Republic as amended by Constitutional Law No 3 of 29 October 1993.
Predsednik je pismo v skladu s členom 6(3) poslovnika posredoval Odboru za pravne zadeve.
The President referred the request to the Committee on Legal Affairs under Rule 6(3).
Odbor je zaslišal Luigija de Magistrisa 22. marca 2011.
Mr De Magistris was heard by that Committee on 22 March 2011.
Ozadje zahteve za zaščito je naslednje: Luigi de Magistris je na zahtevo poslanca Evropskega parlamenta Clementa Maria Mastelle prejel sodni poziv za zglasitev pri sodišču v Beneventu v zvezi z intervjujem, ki je bil 31. oktobra 2009 objavljen v italijanskem časopisu (milanska izdaja dnevnika Epolis).
The background to the request for defence is as follows: Mr De Magistris was summoned before the Court of Benevento by Clemente Mario Mastella, a Member of the European Parliament, in connection with an interview he gave to an Italian newspaper (the Milan edition of the daily newspaper Epolis ) which was published on 31 October 2009.
Vsebina intervjuja je bila raznolika in je zadevala tedanje politične razmere v Italiji.
The content of the interview was wide-ranging and concerned the political situation in Italy at the time.
Izvleček, ki je predmet sodnega poziva, se glasi:
The relevant extract which forms the subject of the writ of summons read as follows:
„[novinar:] Medtem se je v Kampanji pojavila nova zadeva v zvezi z Mastello.
"[interviewer:] Meanwhile, a new Mastella affair has emerged in Campania .
[Luigi de Magistris:] Mastella je bil vpleten v eno od mojih preiskav in me je poskušal ustaviti.
[Mr De Magistris:] Mastella was implicated in one of my investigations and tried to stop me.
Pravi, da je le dajal priporočila, dejansko pa je bil vodja hudodelske združbe, ki je trgovala z zaposlitvami.
He says he only made recommendations, but in fact he was at the head of a criminal ring dealing in jobs.
Če je najemanje delovne sile za Arpac (okoljska oblast, op.ur.) potekalo na tak način, potem okoljsko razdejanje v deželi ni presenečenje.
If that is how hiring worked at the Arpac (the environment authority, ed.), the environmental disaster in the region is no surprise. "
Clemente Mastella trdi, da bil namen izjave „Mastella je bil vpleten v eno od mojih preiskav in me je poskušal ustaviti...“ bralcem dati občutek, da je Mastella poskušal zlorabiti svoj položaj ministra za pravosodje
Mr Mastella alleges that the words "Mastella was implicated in one of my investigations and tried to stop me ..." were intended to give readers the idea that Mr Mastella had sought to abuse his position as Minister of Justice
Čeprav je bil izvoljen v Evropski parlament na volitvah leta 2009, je bil Clemente Mastella v obdobju, da katerega se sklicuje Luigi de Magistris v intervjuju, minister za pravosodje Republike Italije, Luigi de Magistris pa državni tožilec. , da bi de Magistrisa oviral pri njegovem delu državnega tožilca.
Although he was elected to the European Parliament in the 2009 Parliamentary elections, at the time-period which Mr De Magistris referred to in the interview, Mr Mastella was Minister of Justice of the Italian Republic and Mr De Magistris was a public prosecutor. in order to impede Mr De Magistris in his work as public prosecutor.
Clemente Mastella trdi, da so te navedbe popolnoma neresnične in da lahko resno škodijo njegovemu dobremu imenu, zato predstavljajo obrekovanje.
Mr Mastella argues that this allegation is entirely untrue, malicious, and is liable to bring him into serious disrepute, thus constituting libel.
Zahteva odškodnino v višini 1.000.000 EUR in povračilo stroškov, kar namerava dati v dobrodelne namene, in sicer ustanovi „Villaggio dei ragazzi“ v kraju Maddaloni.
His claim for damages amounts to € 1.000.000 plus costs which he intends to "charitably donate to the 'Villaggio dei Ragazzi' in Maddaloni".
Luigi de Magistris pa v svoji zahtevi 5. julija 2010 trdi, da je bil intervju „del [njegovih] političnih dejavnosti“.
On the other hand, Mr De Magistris, in his request of 5 July 2010, argues that the interview was given "as part of [his] political activities".
Trdi, da ima „pravico kritizirati političnega nasprotnik in da ima zato pravico do zaščite po Poslovniku Evropskega parlamenta in Protokolu o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije.“
He claims that he is "entitled to criticise a political opponent and should therefore be afforded protection under the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament and the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union".
Predpisi in postopki o imuniteti poslancev Evropskega parlamenta
Law and procedure on the immunity of Members of the European Parliament
Zoper poslanca Evropskega parlamenta se ne sme začeti preiskava, ne sme biti priprt niti se zoper njega ne sme začeti sodni postopek zaradi mnenja ali glasu, ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti.
Members of the European parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties.
Parlament si pri izvajanju svojih pooblastil v zvezi s privilegiji in imunitetami predvsem prizadeva ohranjati integriteto kot demokratična zakonodajna skupščina in zagotoviti neodvisnost poslancev pri opravljanju njihovih nalog. (...)
In the exercise of its powers in respect of privileges and immunities, Parliament shall seek primarily to uphold its integrity as a democratic legislative assembly and to secure the independence of its Members in performance of their duties. (...)
Zastopa ga lahko drug poslanec. (...)
He may be represented by another Member. (...)
7 Odbor lahko poda obrazloženo mnenje o pristojnosti organa in dopustnosti zahteve, vendar se v nobenem primeru ne izreče niti o krivdi ali nekrivdi poslanca niti o tem, ali mnenja oziroma dejanja, ki so mu pripisana, upravičujejo kazenski pregon, četudi se pri obravnavi zahteve podrobno seznani z dejstvi primera. (...)
7 The committee may offer a reasoned opinion about the competence of the authority in question and about the admissibility of the request, but shall not, under any circumstances, pronounce on the guilt or otherwise of the Member nor on whether or not the opinions or acts attributed to him or her justify prosecution, even if, in considering the request, it acquires detailed knowledge of the facts of the case. (...)
Obrazložitev predlaganega sklepa
Justification for the proposed decision
Luigi de Magistris se je v svoji zahtevi izrecno skliceval na člen 8 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije, ki ga je v tem primeru mogoče uporabiti.
Article 8 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union was expressly invoked by Luigi De Magistris in his request and is applicable in the present case.
Intervju je bil opravljen v času, ko je bil Luigi de Magistris poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, saj je bil izvoljen leta 2009 na volitvah v Evropski parlament.
The interview was given at a time when Luigi de Magistris was a Member of the European Parliament, following his election during the 2009 European Parliament elections.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso Parlamenta dejstvo, da so sodni postopki civilnopravne ali upravnopravne narave ali da vsebujejo vidike, ki sodijo v civilno ali upravno pravo, samo po sebi ne predstavlja ovire za veljavnost imunitete iz tega člena.
In accordance with Parliament's established practice, the fact that the legal proceedings are of a civil or administrative law nature, or contain certain aspects falling under civil or administrative law, does not per se prevent the immunity afforded by that article from applying.
Kakor je ugotovilo Sodišče, mora biti obseg absolutne imunitete iz člena 8 določen le na podlagi prava Skupnosti
As the Court of Justice has held, the scope of the absolute immunity provided for in Article 8 "must be established on the basis of Community law alone"
Zadeva Marra, citirana zgoraj, odstavek 26. .
Marra , cited above, at paragraph 26. .
Odbor meni, da je Luigi de Magistris pri dajanju zadevnega intervjuja opravljal svojo dolžnost poslanca Evropskega parlamenta in je opravljal politično dejavnost s tem, da je izražal svoje mnenje o zadevi, ki je za njegove volivce javnega interesa.
The Committee considers that, in giving the interview in question, Luigi de Magistris was acting in the performance of his duties as Member of the European Parliament and carrying out political activities by expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents.