natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice morajo sporočiti vse predpise nacionalnega prava s področja, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
The Member States should communicate all provisions of national law in the field covered by the directive.
PRILOGA: Člen 27(4) češke ustave:............................................................................................8
ANNEX: Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution..........................................................................8
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Miloslavu Ransdorfu, ki so jo posredovali pristojni organi Češke republike dne 16. septembra 2009 in ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 23. novembra 2009,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Miloslav Ransdorf, forwarded by the competent authority of the Czech Republic on 16 September 2009, and announced in plenary sitting on 23 November 2009,
– po zagovoru Miloslava Ransdorfa, v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Miloslav Ransdorf in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju člena 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965, pa tudi člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Article 9 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropske unije z dne 12. maja 1964 in 10. julija 1986
– having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
Zadeva 101/63 Wagner proti Fohrmann in Krier [1964] Zbirka 383, in zadeva 149/85 Wybot proti Faure in drugi [1986] Zbirka 2391. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0107/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7‑0107/2010 ),
A. ker je Miroslav Randsdorf poslanec Evropskega parlamenta,
A. whereas Miroslav Ransdorf is a Member of the European Parliament,
B. ker v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 med zasedanji Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države, in ker kadar je poslanec zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja, sklicevanje na imuniteto ni mogoče; ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu,
B. whereas, according to Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament; whereas immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is caught in the act of committing an offence; and whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
C. ker v skladu s členom 27(4) češke ustave ni mogoče kazensko preganjati poslanca parlamenta ali senatorja brez soglasja predstavniškega telesa, katerega član je, in, če to telo odreče svoje soglasje, je kazenski pregon za vedno prepovedan,
C. whereas, according to Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution, no Member of Parliament or Senator may be criminally prosecuted without the consent of the chamber of which he or she is member and, if the respective chamber denies its consent, criminal prosecution shall be excluded forever,
V prejšnjem zakonodajnem obdobju je Evropski parlament 3. februarja 2009 (resolucija 2008/2176 (IMM)) že odvzel poslansko imuniteto poslancu Ransdorfu za namene istega kazenskega postopka.
In the course of the previous parliamentary term the European Parliament had already decided, on 3 February 2009, to waive Mr Miloslav Ransdorf's immunity for the purposes of the same criminal prosecution (resolution winding up procedure No 2008/2176(IMM) ).
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti na dejstvo, da je v skladu z ureditvijo Češke republike v primeru ponovne izvolitve poslanca treba od predstavniškega telesa, ki ji mu poslanec pripada, ponovno zahtevati odvzem poslanske imunitete (sodba vrhovnega sodišča 48/96).
However, Czech law requires that, if a member of parliament is re-elected, a new request for the waiver of the member's immunity must be submitted to the new parliament (Decision No 48/96 of the Czech Supreme Court).
Po poročanju čeških oblasti je Miroslav Ransdorf 8. junija 2007 v Pragi (Praga 6) vozil osebni avtomobil, ko je z avtom zadel peško na označenem prehodu za pešce, pri čemer je peška utrpela telesne poškodbe.
According to the Czech authorities, on 8 June 2007, Mr Ransdorf was driving a private car in Prague 6 when he struck and injured a female pedestrian at a zebra crossing who sustained injuries which constituted bodily harm.
S tem dejanjem je Miroslav Ransdorf kršil določbo člena 5/1h zakona št. 361/2000 o cestnem prometu.
By his action, Mr Ransdorf contravened the provisions of paragraph 5(1h) of Law No 361/2000 Coll. on the road traffic act.
Gre za primer utemeljenega suma, da je bilo storjeno kaznivo dejanje telesne poškodbe v skladu s členom 223 zakona št. 140/1961 - Kazenskega zakonika, ki določa: "Kdor drugega telesno poškoduje iz malomarnosti, s kršitvijo pomembne obveznosti, ki izvira iz njegovega dela, poklica, položaja ali dolžnosti, ki mu jo nalaga zakon, se kaznuje z zaporno kaznijo do enega leta ali s prepovedjo opravljanja dejavnosti."
This is a case of reasonable suspicion that a criminal act - injury to health - was committed under paragraph 223 of Law No 140/1961 Coll. - the Criminal Code, which states: "A person who injures another’s health through negligence, by breaching an important duty arising from his employment, profession, position or office or a duty imposed by law, shall be punished by a term imprisonment of up to one year or prohibition of a (specific) activity."
Vsakdo, ki stori kaznivo dejanje, je za to kaznivo dejanje odgovoren po kazenskem zakoniku (člen 9).
Any person who himself commits a criminal act becomes an offender under the Criminal Code (paragraph 9).
Določbe člena 65 kazenskega zakonika o prenehanju nevarnosti, ki jo kaznivo dejanje prestavlja za družbo, v skladu s katero " odgovornost za kaznovanje dejanja, ki je bilo nevarno za družbo, ko je bilo storjeno, preneha, če zaradi spremembe okoliščin ali v osebni sferi storilca je nevarnost, ki jo to kaznivo dejanje predstavlja za družbo, prenehalo ", ni mogoče uporabiti v tem primeru.
The provisions of paragraph 65 of the Criminal Code on the cessation of the danger represented by a criminal act to society, pursuant to which "The liability to punishment for an act which was dangerous to society when it was committed shall extinguish if, because of a change in the situation or person of the offender, the danger represented by such criminal act to society has passed." may not be used in this case.
V skladu s členom 67/1d kazenskega zakonika je zastaralna doba tri leta.
Under paragraph 67(1d) of the Criminal Code, the period of limitation is three years.
Člena 8 in 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 določata naslednje:
Articles 8 and 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, read as follows:
Člen 8:
Article 8:
a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane članom parlamenta te države;
a. in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;
b) na ozemlju drugih držav članic imuniteto pred kakršnim koli ukrepom ali priporom in sodnim postopkom.
b. in the territory of other Member States, immunity from any measure or detention and from legal proceedings.
Seveda uporaba člena 8 protokola ne pride v poštev iz razloga, ki je očiten, in sicer, da v nobenem primeru telesne poškodbe, ki jih povzroči voznik osebnega avtomobila, ne morejo pomeniti mnenja ali glasu, ki ga poslanec Evropskega parlamenta izreče pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti.
First and foremost, the applicability of Article 8 of the Protocol is obviously out of question for the evident reason that in no way can personal injuries caused by a car driver be equated with the opinions expressed or the votes cast in the performance of the duties of a Member of the European Parliament.
V členu 9 pa je edini odsek, ki ga je mogoče uporabiti, glede na to, da so obtožbe, ki bremenijo Miroslava Ransdorfa, povezane z dejanji, ki jih je storil v Češki republiki, katere državljan je bil v tistem trenutku, naslednji: " Med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi člani uživajo: a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane članom parlamenta te države".
As for Article 9, given that the charges brought against Mr Ransdorf refer to facts committed in the Czech Republic, whose citizenship he enjoyed at that moment, the only applicable part is the following: " During the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy: a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament ".
Nadalje člen 27(4) češke ustave določa, da " Ni mogoče kazensko preganjati poslanca ali senatorja brez soglasja predstavniškega telesa, katerega član je.
Furthermore, Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution provides that "No Deputy or Senator may be criminally prosecuted without the consent of the chamber of which he or she is member.
o dialogu med univerzami in podjetji: novo partnerstvo za posodobitev univerz
on university-business dialogue: a new partnership for the modernisation of Europe’s universities
Teresa Riera Madurell , Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko
Teresa Riera Madurell , Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko Error!
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (*) ..........18
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 2. aprila 2009 z naslovom Novo partnerstvo za posodobitev univerz: forum EU za dialog med univerzami in podjetji ( KOM(2009)0158 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 2 April 2009 entitled ‘A new partnership for the modernisation of universities: the EU Forum for University Business Dialogue’ ( COM(2009)0158 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. maja 2006 z naslovom Uresničevanje agende za posodobitev univerz: izobraževanje, raziskave in inovacije ( KOM(2006)0208 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 10 May 2006 entitled ‘Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: education, research and innovation’ ( COM(2006)0208 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva po zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Lizboni 23. in 24. marca 2000,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions issued following the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva, ki so bili objavljeni po zasedanju Evropskega sveta 13. in 14. marca 2008, zlasti dela o vlaganju v ljudi in posodabljanju trga dela,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions issued following the European Council of 13 and 14 March 2008, notably the part on ‘investing in people and modernising labour markets’,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva, ki so bili objavljeni po zasedanju Evropskega sveta 19. in 20. marca 2008, zlasti dela o najboljši uporabi obnovljene lizbonske strategije za rast in delovna mesta,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions issued following the European Council of 19 and 20 March 2009, notably the part on ‘making full use of the renewed Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs’,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta z dne 15. novembra 2007 o novih znanjih in spretnostih za nova delovna mesta
– having regard to the Council resolution of 15 November 2007 on the new skills for new jobs
UL L 290, 4.12.2007, str.
OJ C 290, 4.12.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 12. maja 2009 o strateškem okviru za evropsko sodelovanje v izobraževanju in usposabljanju („ET 2020“)
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (‘ET 2020’)
UL L 119, 28.05.2009, str.
OJ C 119, 28.5.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. januarja 2008 z naslovom Izobraževanje odraslih: za učenje ni nikoli prepozno
– having regard to its resolution of 16 January 2008 entitled ‘Adult learning: it is never too late to learn’
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0423 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0423 . ,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij o dialogu med univerzami in podjetji z dne 4. decembra 2009
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 4 December 2009 on university-business dialogue
CdR 157/2009 konč. in mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 17. decembra 2009
CdR 157/2009 fin. and to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 17 December 2009
– ob upoštevanju študije Evropskega parlamenta z naslovom Nadaljnji razvoj dialoga med univerzami in podjetji,
– having regard to the study published by the European Parliament entitled ‘Further Developing the University-Business Dialogue’,
– ob upoštevanju člena 165 in 166 Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
– having regard to Articles 165 and 166 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7‑0108/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7‑0108/2010 ),
A. ker je Evropski svet na svojem zasedanju 19. in 20. marca 2009 pozval države članice, naj spodbujajo partnerstva med podjetništvom, raziskavami, izobraževanjem in usposabljanjem,
A. whereas the European Council of 19 and 20 March 2009 called on the Member States to encourage partnerships between business, research, education and training,
B. ker sporočilo ministrov za visoko šolstvo, objavljeno po konferenci 28. – 29. aprila 2009, poziva, naj javne politike „v celoti priznajo vrednost različnih nalog visokega šolstva, od izobraževanja in raziskav prek zavezanosti socialni koheziji in kulturnemu razvoju do koristi za skupnost“,
B. whereas the communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education of 28-29 April 2009 calls for public policies that ‘fully recognise the value of various missions of higher education, ranging from teaching and research to community service and engagement in social cohesion and cultural development’,
C. ker so univerze s svojo trojno vlogo (izobraževanje, raziskave in inovacije) bistvene za prihodnost Evropske unije in izobraževanje njenih državljanov in ker je naloga visokega šolstva zagotoviti učno okolje, ki spodbuja avtonomnost, ustvarjalnost in optimalno uporabo znanja,
C. whereas, in view of their threefold function (education, research and innovation), universities have a vital part to play in the future of the Union and the education of its citizens, and whereas the role of higher education is to provide a learning environment that promotes autonomy, creativity and optimum use of knowledge,
D. ker je oblikovanje izobraževalnih politik še vedno v pristojnosti držav članic, ki so odgovorne za organizacijo, vsebino in reformo svojih izobraževalnih sistemov,
D. whereas responsibility for setting education policies remains a matter for the Member States, which are responsible for the organisation, content and reform of their education systems,
E. ker razlike v ekonomskem in socialnem položaju prebivalcev različnih delov Evrope kličejo po izravnavi možnosti izobraževanja za vse prebivalce Evropske unije in po podpori za nadarjene, ekonomsko prikrajšane mlade,
E. whereas the differences in the economic and social levels of the inhabitants of the various parts of Europe call for a levelling of educational opportunities for all European Union citizens and support for talented economically disadvantaged youth,
F. ker je zaradi sedanje gospodarske krize, ki povzroča izgubo delovnih mest, zelo pomembno izredno učinkovito sodelovanje med institucijami visokega šolstva in podjetji,
F. whereas the continuing economic crisis, which is resulting in the loss of jobs, makes it important to have extremely effective cooperation between higher education institutions and businesses,
G. ker je nujno treba izvesti, uskladiti in spodbuditi enoten pristop vseh držav, ki so podpisale bolonjski proces, zlasti na področju mobilnosti študentov in popolnega priznavanja diplom, v ta namen pa je potrebno ustrezno vrednotenje tega procesa, ki bo odkrilo težave in ovire,
G. whereas it is urgent to implement, coordinate and promote a coherent approach among all those countries having signed the Bologna Process, especially in the field of student mobility and full recognition of diplomas, and to do so necessitates a proper assessment of the said process that identifies the difficulties and obstacles,
H. ker bo imela Evropska komisija pomembno vlogo pri omogočanju lažje izmenjave informacij in zgledov dobre prakse med državami članicami EU in državami, ki mejijo na EU,
H. whereas the European Commission has an important role to play in facilitating exchanges of information and good practices among the EU Member States and the EU’s neighbouring countries,
I. ker je zaradi raznolikosti institucij visokega šolstva, podjetniških krogov in načinov sodelovanja težko oblikovati idealni način sodelovanja, ki bi ustrezal profilu, prednostnim ciljem in zahtevam vseh institucij v Evropi; ker je treba v vsakem primeru ohraniti avtonomijo univerz in njihovo zmožnost, da izberejo za svoje namene najustreznejše modele poslovnega partnerstva,
I. whereas the diverse range of higher education institutions, business circles and types of cooperation makes it hard to agree on an ideal cooperation model that would match the profile, priorities and requirements of every institution in Europe; whereas the autonomy of universities and their ability to choose the most suitable business partnership models for their purposes should be maintained in all circumstances,
J. ker je izobraževanje naloga družbe kot celote in se država posledično ne more izogniti svoji finančni odgovornosti,
J. whereas education is a task of society as a whole for which the State must not shirk its financial responsibility,
K. ker visokošolska izobrazba ostaja javna odgovornost, zato je javno financiranje univerz potrebno za ohranjanje enakega financiranja vseh študijskih programov, tudi humanističnih ved; ker je pomembno dati univerzam finančno podporo (na primer prek javno-zasebnih partnerstev), hkrati pa jim zagotoviti, da bodo obdržale svojo samostojnost in kakovost,
K. whereas higher education remains a public responsibility and therefore public financing to universities is needed in order to preserve equal financing to all fields of study, e.g. humanities; whereas it is important to support universities financially (for example through public-private partnerships), while at the same time guaranteeing their autonomy and quality assurance,
L. ker sta izobraževanje in usposabljanje, ki morata zagotoviti usvajanje temeljev splošne in državljanske kulture, odlična načina za pomoč nerazvitim regijam, da premostijo razlike, poleg tega, da ustvarjata delovna mesta in spodbujata konkurenčnost, pa sta bistvena tudi za kulturni in medkulturni pluralizem ter državljansko življenje,
L. whereas education and training, which should lead to acquisition of the fundaments of general and civic culture, are excellent means of helping underdeveloped regions close up and, in addition to job creation and the promotion of competitiveness, are essential for cultural and intellectual plurality and civic life,
M. ker ima sodelovanje med univerzami in podjetji podporo v številnih programih EU, a te dejavnosti pogosto niso usklajene med institucijami,
M. whereas university-business cooperation is supported by many EU programmes, but such action is not always coordinated among institutions,
5. pozdravlja sporočilo ministrov za visoko šolstvo, objavljeno po konferenci 28. – 29. aprila 2009, v katerem se zavezujejo k uresničitvi ciljev evropskega visokošolskega prostora, v katerem je visoko šolstvo javna odgovornost in si vse visokošolske ustanove prek raznolikosti svojih nalog prizadevajo odzivati se na potrebe družbe v širšem smislu;
Welcomes the communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education of 28-29 April 2009, which stresses their commitment to ‘the goals of the European Higher Education Area, which is an area where higher education is a public responsibility, and where all higher education institutions are responsive to the wider needs of society through the diversity of their missions’;
7. poziva k zavedanju in konkretnemu ukrepanju držav članic, kjer pravni in finančni okvir še vedno ne nagrajujeta ali celo ovirata prizadevanja univerz za sodelovanje s poslovnim sektorjem;
Calls for awareness and concrete action by Member States where legal and financial framework still fail to reward or even inhibit the efforts of universities to cooperate with the business sector;
9. meni, da je treba okrepiti meddisciplinarnost in čezdisciplinarnost izobraževalnih in raziskovalnih programov ter sodelovanje med univerzami, s tega vidika pa je IKT ključni bistveno orodje;
Considers it necessary to strengthen the interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary nature of education and research programmes as well as cooperation among universities, and that ICT are an essential tool in this respect;
11. poudarja, da se bodo z okrepitvijo dialoga in sodelovanja med univerzami in podjetji povečale možnosti za vzajemne koristi, ki bodo spodbudile gospodarsko rast, hkrati pa bodo koristne v širšem družbenem smislu, saj bodo prispevale k razvoju družbe, temelječe na znanju;
Emphasises that improved dialogue and collaboration between universities and business will offer increased opportunities to gain mutual benefits that not only stimulate economic growth, but are also useful in a wider social sense in that they contribute to an ever-improving knowledge-based society;
15. poudarja, da je treba povzdigniti in spodbuditi preiskave in raziskave, vendar ne samo v naravoslovju in tehnologiji, temveč tudi v družboslovju in humanistiki, ki ponujata dragoceno znanje za sodobno poslovanje;
Underlines the need to dignify and give an incentive to investigation and research, not only in scientific and technologic areas but also in social and human areas where valuable knowledge for state-of-the-art business is provided;
19. poudarja, da mora EU, glede na to, da pomeni vseživljenjsko učenje nenehen stik ne samo z izobraževanjem in usposabljanjem, ampak tudi s kulturo, spodbujati, da nacionalni organi podpirajo, javne univerze pa ohranjajo in spodbujajo vključevanje humanističnih ved v učne načrte;
Stresses that since lifelong learning is a continuous contact not only with education and training but also with culture, it is of crucial importance for the EU to encourage, for the national states to support and for the public universities to preserve and promote the inclusion of the humanities in their educational curricula;
22. poudarja, da so vseživljenjsko učenje, obveščenost in usposabljanje ter obvladovanje veščin, ki so posebej pomembne za trg dela, osnova tudi za posameznikovo intelektualno in osebno rast;
Emphasises that lifelong learning, information and training, as well as providing particularly important skills for the labour market, are also a precondition for man’s intellectual development and personal growth;
26. ponovno poudarja pomen prenosa in izmenjave znanja, spretnosti in izkušenj, ki so jih pridobili odrasli, saj se tako mlade generacije lažje uvedejo na trg dela (na primer z mentorstvom);
Reiterates the importance of transmitting and exchanging the knowledge, skills and experience gained by adults, as a mean of guiding younger generations into the labour market (for example through mentoring schemes);