natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Navedena zgoraj. je bila sprejeta pred ustanovitvijo agencije EASA, zato ta v njej ni mogla biti upoštevana.
Cited above. could not take account of EASA since it was adopted before the Agency’s establishment.
Takšno stanje dopušča nesprejemljiva tveganja na področju varnosti
This is creating unacceptable safety risks
Kar je potrdila tudi revizija agencije EASA, ki jo je opravila Mednarodna organizacija za civilno letalstvo (ICAO). .
As confirmed by an audit of EASA by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). .
Torej je upravičeno, da je v novi uredbi predviden jasen pravni okvir za sodelovanje agencije pri preiskavah v zvezi z varnostjo.
It is therefore justified for the new regulation to provide for a clear legal framework for the Agency’s involvement in safety investigations.
Poročevalka želi posebej obravnavati tri točke:
Your rapporteur wishes to address two specific issues:
(a) Neodvisnost preiskav v zvezi z varnostjo
(a) Independence of safety investigations
Uredba v nobenem primeru ne bi smela dopuščati možnosti, da agencija EASA vpliva na preiskavo v zvezi z varnostjo ali da vzporedno vodi svojo preiskavo.
The regulation should under no circumstances allow EASA the possibility of influencing a safety investigation or conducting another inquiry alongside that investigation.
Ker je agencija pristojna za potrjevanje zrakoplovov, ne more biti hkrati razsodnik in stranka v postopku.
As the body responsible for aircraft certification, the Agency cannot be both judge and party.
Besedilo ne sme dopuščati dvoumnosti.
There should be no room for ambiguity in the text.
Ker je letalski promet pogosto mednaroden, so lahko v preiskavo v zvezi z varnostjo vključene neevropske države.
As air transport is often international, a safety investigation may involve non-European states.
V takšnih primerih je zaradi pravne varnosti pomembno, da je izraz, ki opredeljuje vlogo agencije EASA v preiskavi, izrecno opredeljen v Prilogi 13 ICAO
Bearing this in mind and with a view to ensuring legal certainty, it is important that the term used to define EASA’s role in investigations be clearly set out in Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation
Navedena zgoraj. , ki ureja preiskave na mednarodni ravni.
Cited above. , which governs international investigations.
To ne velja za izraza „strokovno telo“ in „strokovnjak“, uporabljena v predlogu uredbe
Given that the term ‘expert’ used in the proposal for a regulation
V členu 9(1) predloga uredbe ( KOM(2009)0611 ).
In Article 9(1) of the proposal for a regulation (COM(2009)611).
Izraz strokovnjak se v zgoraj navedeni Prilogi 13 ICAO pojavi dvakrat, vendar ni opredeljen. , kar bi utegnilo povzročiti negotovost.
The term ‘expert’ appears twice in Annex 13 to the ICAO Convention, but is not defined. does not meet this criterion, there is a risk of uncertainty arising.
Zato je primerneje uporabljati nedvoumno poimenovanje, ki ne bo zbujalo dvomov o sodelovanju agencije pri preiskavah.
It would therefore be preferable to use a clear designation, ensuring that the Agency’s involvement in investigations cannot be called into question.
Poročevalka zato predlaga, da se v tej uredbi agencija EASA, kadar gre za njeno sodelovanje v preiskavah v zvezi varnostjo, opredeli kot „svetovalec“ in da ima pravice svetovalcev, ki izhajajo iz Priloge 13.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that EASA be defined in the regulation as ‘adviser’ with regard to its involvement in safety investigations and that it enjoy the rights conferred on advisers under Annex 13.
(c) Dostop agencije EASA do varnostnih informacij
(c) EASA access to safety information
Za zagotovitev varnosti v letalstvu mora imeti agencija ves čas preiskave dostop do pomembnih informacij in varnostnih priporočil, da bi lahko hitro oblikovala navodila za plovnost
With a view to ensuring air safety, the Agency should have access throughout investigations to any relevant information and safety recommendations which will allow it to establish airworthiness directives with delay
Člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008: navedeno zgoraj .
Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, cited above. .
Prenos informacij agenciji EASA ni tako sistematičen kot prenos informacij nacionalnim organom za civilno letalstvo.
However, information is not forwarded as systematically to EASA as to national civil aviation authorities.
Zato bi bilo treba ta tok informacij vključiti v pravni okvir in spodbujati organe za preiskave, naj tesneje sodelujejo z agencijo.
Rules are therefore required for this flow of information and as a means of encouraging investigation authorities to cooperate more closely with the Agency.
Usklajevanje preiskav
Coordination between investigations
Pogosto se ob preiskavi v zvezi z varnostjo začne en ali več sodnih postopkov
In many cases, one or more legal actions are in progress at the same time as the safety investigations
Take preiskave so med seboj neodvisne.
Such inquiries are independent of one another.
Kljub temu pa je tehnična preiskava osredotočena zgolj na varnost, ne pa na ugotavljanje odgovornosti, imajo ugotovitve organa za tehnično preiskavo in njeni zaključki velik vpliv na sodno preiskavo. .
However, although technical investigations are only concerned with safety aspects and do not seek to establish who was responsible, the facts established by technical investigation authorities and their findings do have a major impact on judicial inquiries. .
Preiskovalcem, ki opravljajo preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo, je treba zagotoviti pogoje dela, v katerih za dostop do dokazov ali njihovo proučevanje ne bodo potrebovali sodnega naloga.
Steps must be taken to ensure that those responsible for safety investigations are allowed to do their work without having to ask the courts for authorisation to have access to or to examine evidence.
Seveda so okoliščine v primeru nezakonitega dejanja drugačne in je treba dati prednost sodni preiskavi
Obviously, in the case of an unlawful act, the circumstances are different and judicial investigations must be given precedence
Člen 13(2) predloga uredbe, navedeno zgoraj. .
Article 13(2) of the proposal for a regulation, cited above. .
(b) Dostop do občutljivih varnostnih informacij
(b) Access to sensitive information
Osebe, vpletene v nesrečo
It is essential that persons involved in an accident
Preživelo osebje, kontrolorji zračnega prometa, upravljavci zrakoplova itd. , morajo nujno sodelovati pri preiskavi v zvezi z varnostjo, da bi se ugotovili vzroki nesreče.
Surviving personnel, air traffic controllers, aircraft operators etc. cooperate with the safety investigation in order to establish the causes of the accident.
Če te osebe zaradi strahu, da bi bilo njihovo pričanje brez privoljenja predano sodstvu, ne bodo želele odgovarjati v preiskavi v zvezi z varnostjo, bo to za varnost v letalstvu pomenilo tveganje.
Any refusal by such persons to reply to the safety investigation for fear of seeing their testimony transferred to the courts without their consent creates an air safety risk.
Vendar je tudi sodstvu treba omogočiti opravljanje dela, družinam pa ugotovitev odgovornosti pred sodiščem.
On the other hand, the courts must be allowed to do their work, and families have a right to expect the courts to establish who was responsible.
Zato morajo sodni organi imeti dostop do pomembnih informacij.
To do this, the judicial authorities must have access to the relevant information.
Komisija predlaga, da se določeno število informacij zaščiti, vendar pa sodstvo lahko dostopa do njih, če to upravičuje „prevladujoč javni interes“
The Commission is proposing that certain records be protected, but that the judicial authorities may be allowed access to them where this is justified by ‘an overriding public interest’
Člen 15(2) predloga uredbe, navedeno zgoraj. .
Article 15(2) of the proposal for a regulation, cited above. .
Pojem „prevladujoč javni interes“ je precej ohlapen in se med državami članicami lahko razlikuje.
However, the concept of ‘an overriding public interest’ is fairly vague and may differ from one Member State to another.
Poleg tega se ob nesrečah s smrtnimi žrtvami pogosto meni, da gre za prevladujoč javni interes.
Moreover, an accident which causes a person’s death is often considered as a case of overriding public interest.
Zato občutljive informacije niso več zaščitene.
Sensitive information is therefore no longer protected in such cases.
Poročevalka predlaga, da se vse, kar je povezano z ugotavljanjem dejstev in analizo dokazov, preda sodstvu, ostali podatki pa ostanejo zaupni.
Your rapporteur is proposing that any information relating to the establishment of the facts and analysis of the evidence be forwarded to the courts, but that any other information remain confidential.
Pravice žrtev in njihovih sorodnikov
Rights of victims and their families
(a) Seznam potnikov
(a) Passenger lists
Komisija predlaga, da mora letalski prevoznik pripraviti seznam v eni uri po prejemu obvestila, da se je zrakoplovu zgodila nesreča.
The Commission is proposing that airlines be required to be able to produce the list within an hour of the notification of an accident.
Poročevalka podpira to zamisel, vendar želi, da ne velja samo za letalske prevoznike v Uniji in tiste, ki letijo iz nje, ampak tudi za vse letalske družbe, ki letijo v Evropo.
Your rapporteur endorses this idea but believes that it should not apply only to Community airlines and to those that fly from the EU but also to all airlines that come to Europe.
Nobenega razloga ni, da bi razlikovali potnike, ki potujejo v EU, na podlagi letalskega prevoznika, ki ga ti potniki uporabljajo.
There is no reason to create discrimination between passengers bound for the Union on the basis of the airline they use.
(b) Informacije o smrti potnika
(b) Information on the death of a passenger
V primeru nesreče dobijo letalske družbe na tisoče klicev
When an accident occurs, the airline receives thousands of calls
Prevoznik Air France je po izginotju leta AF 447 med Riom in Parizom 31. maja 2009 prejel več kot 20.000 klicev. in pogosto se dolgo ugotavlja, kdo je oseba, ki jo je treba obvestiti o smrti.
Air France received over 20 000 calls in one day following the disappearance of flight AF 447 from Rio to Paris on 31 May 2009. , and it often takes a long time to identify the appropriate person to be informed of a passenger’s death.
Poročevalka želi uvesti obveznost za letalske prevoznike
Your rapporteur wishes to introduce an obligation on airlines
Podatki bi morali biti ločeni od osebnih podatkov, zahtevanih za primer spremembe voznega reda ali odpovedi leta. , v skladu s katero bodo potnikom ob rezervaciji predlagali, naj navedejo podatke o kontaktni osebi za primer nesreče
As is already the case in the United States. to ask passengers to provide details, at the time of booking a flight, of a person to be contacted in the event of an accident
V ZDA ta obveznost že obstaja. .
This information would be distinct from the details of the person to be contacted in the event of a change of flight schedule or of flight cancellation. .
(c) Pomoč sorodnikom
(c) Assistance to families
Komisija predlaga, da „države članice poskrbijo, da se na nacionalni ravni pripravi načrt za pomoč žrtvam nesreč v civilnem letalstvu in njihovim družinam“
The Commission’s proposal states that ‘the Member States shall ensure that a plan for the assistance of the victims of civil aviation accidents and their families is set up at national level’
Člen 23 predloga uredbe, navedeno zgoraj. .
Article 23 of the proposal for a regulation, cited above. .
Kadar se zgodi nesreča, je prvi sogovornik, na katerega se obrnejo sorodniki potnikov, letalski prevoznik.
However, when an accident occurs, the airline is the first point of contact for passengers’ families.
Zato poročevalka meni, da bi bilo za države članice treba dodati obveznost preverjanja, ali imajo letalski prevozniki, registrirani na njihovem ozemlju, krizni načrt
Your rapporteur therefore considers that Member States should be required, in addition, to check that airlines established on their territory also have their own crisis-response plan
Krizni načrti bi se lahko zgledovali po okrožnici 285/AN/166 ICAO in bi jih bilo treba revidirati. .
Such crisis-response plans could be based on ICAO circular 285/AN/166 and should be audited. .
Poleg tega mora država, ki opravlja preiskavo v zvezi z varnostjo, določiti odgovorno osebo, ki bo glavni stik za sorodnike žrtev.
The state responsible for the safety investigation should also be required to appoint a main contact person for the families of passengers.
Odgovorna oseba bi usklajevala informacije različnih sodelujočih organov, jih posredovala sorodnikom potnikov, obveščala pa bi jih tudi o različnih nadaljnjih postopkih
The contact person could coordinate the information obtained from the different bodies involved, forward it to passengers’ families and also inform them of the various procedures that follow
Preiskava v zvezi z varnostjo, morebitna sodna preiskava, plačilo odškodnine, identifikacija trupel itd. .
Safety investigation, possibly judicial inquiry, compensation payments, identification of bodies etc. .
Bila bi pomembna podpora sorodnikom žrtev, ki so pogosto izgubljeni ob srečanju s številnimi akterji in postopki, potem ko jih je že prizadela bolečina ob izgubi bližnjega.
This would provide important support for families of victims, who often feel lost when faced with a huge number of contacts and procedures when they are already having to cope with the loss of a loved one.
Treba pa bi bilo tudi predvideti določbe, na podlagi katerih bi bil družinam omogočen dostop do notranjih informacij o poteku preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo, zlasti da pred njihovo objavo pridobijo vmesna poročila in končno poročilo o preiskavi.
Moreover, steps should be taken to enable families to have special access to information on the progress of the safety investigation, and in particular to receive interim reports and the final investigation report before they are made public.
(d) Montrealska konvencija
(d) Montreal Convention
Montrealska konvencija o poenotenju nekaterih pravil za mednarodni letalski prevoz, ki velja od 28. junija 2004 in ureja zlasti civilnopravno odgovornost letalskih prevoznikov v primeru odškodnin žrtvam letalskih nesreč in njihovim družinam.
The Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage, which entered into force on 28 June 2004, lays down rules governing the civil liability of air carriers in respect of victims of aviation accidents and their families.
Do danes je konvencijo podpisalo 93 držav.
Ninety-three states are currently parties to the Convention.
Poročevalka meni, da bi ta pravila morala ščititi evropske potnike, ne glede na letalskega prevoznika, in da je v uredbi treba poudariti obveznost za vse letalske prevoznike, ki želijo pristajati in vzletati v Evropski uniji, da spoštujejo določbe Montrealske konvencije.
Your rapporteur considers that European travellers should be protected by these rules, irrespective of the company they fly with, and that the regulation should make it compulsory for all airlines wishing to provide services in the European Union to comply with the provisions of the Montreal Convention.
Poročanje o dogodkih v civilnem letalstvu
Civil aviation occurrence reports
Komisija se ni odločila za spremembo Direktive 2003/42/ES
The Commission has decided not to revise Directive 2003/42/EC
Direktiva 2003/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. junija 2003 o poročanju o dogodkih v civilnem letalstvu (UL L 167, 4.7.2003, str.
European Parliament and Council Directive 2003/42/EC of 13 June 2003 on occurrence reporting in civil aviation (OJ L 167, 04.07.2003, p.
23). , ker meni, da je za spremembe te zakonodaje še prezgodaj.
23). because it considers that such a change would be premature.
Vendar je v predlogu uredbe navedena
However, the proposal for a regulation does refer to the matter
Člen 15(3) predloga uredbe, navedeno zgoraj. .
Article 15(3) of the proposal for a regulation, cited above. .
Zaenkrat sistem poročanja o dogodkih v zvezi z varnostjo ne deluje optimalno.
It must be said that the way in which the occurrence report system works is far from ideal.
Pravzaprav zgolj del držav članic vnaša podatke v centralno podatkovno bazo ECCAIRS
Not all Member States feed data into the ECCAIRS central repository
Uvedla jo je Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1321/2007 z dne 12. novembra 2007 o določitvi izvedbenih pravil za vključitev informacij o dogodkih v civilnem letalstvu, izmenjanih v skladu z Direktivo 2003/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, v centralno podatkovno bazo (UL L 294, 13.11.2007, str.
Created by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1321/2007 of 12 November 2007 laying down implementing rules for the integration into a central repository of information on civil aviation occurrences exchanged in accordance with Directive 2003/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 294, 13.11.2007, p.
3). , v kateri bi morali biti zbrani vsi dogodki, ki se zgodijo v Uniji.
3). , which is intended to group together all events which occur in the EU.
Poleg tega ni nihče odgovoren za analizo podatkov, ki so v centralni podatkovni bazi ECCAIRS na evropski ravni.
Moreover, nobody is responsible for analysing the data contained in ECCAIRS at European level.
Analiza teh podatkov bi bila izredno koristna za varnost v letalstvu
An analysis of this information would surely be extremely useful to aviation safety
Omogočila bi razbiranje trendov, zaradi katerih se nesreče ponavljajo, in zmanjšala tveganje za nesreče, ker bi omogočila sprejetje varnostnih priporočil, ki bi ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti popravljala. .
This would make it possible to detect the recurrence of incidents and to reduce the risk of accidents by establishing safety recommendations to remedy the shortcomings identified. .
Poročevalka želi, da bi se določbe iz sedanjega predloga uredbe dopolnile, zlasti z zahtevo, da agencija EASA, v sodelovanju z državami članicami, analizira in razvrsti informacije iz baze ECCAIRS.
Your rapporteur would like to expand the provisions in the present proposal for a regulation, in particular to ask EASA, in cooperation with states, to analyse and classify the information contained in ECCAIRS.
(Prenovitev – člen 87 Poslovnika)
(Recast - Rule 87 of the Rules of Procedure)
PRILOGA: PISMO ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE...........................................................72
ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS...................................76
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE DELOVNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA, SVETA IN KOMISIJE 74
ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION 78
(Postopek soodločanja: prva obravnava)
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading - recast)
- ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0809 ),
- having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0809 ),
- ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7-0471/2008 ),
- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0471/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom Posledice začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja ( KOM(2009)0665 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication to Parliament and the Council entitled: 'Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures' (COM)2009)0665),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU,
- ob upoštevanju mnenja Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 16. decembra 2009
- having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16 December 2009
- ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 29. maja 2010
- having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 29 May 2010
UL C 141, 29.05.2010, str.
OJ C 141, 29.5.2010, p.
- ob upoštevanju členov 87 in 55 svojega poslovnika,
- having regard to Rules 87 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0196/2010 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0196/2010 ),
(3a) Direktiva 2008/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z 19. novembra 2008 daje prednost zakonodaji s področja preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov.
(3a) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 gives first priority to prevention in waste legislation.
Preprečevanje je med drugim opredeljeno z ukrepi za zmanjšanje vsebnosti škodljivih snovi v materialih in proizvodih.
Prevention is defined inter alia as measures that reduce the content of harmful substances in materials and products.
Prenovo direktive RoHS je treba vključiti v okvir hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki, ki je bila vzpostavljena z okvirno direktivo o odpadkih leta 2008.
The recast of RoHS should be put into the context of the waste hierarchy established in the waste framework directive in 2008.
Prenova direktive RoHS je zato pomembna priložnost za prenos te obveznosti v prakso, saj električna in elektronska oprema še vedno povzroča številne težave pri obdelavi odpadkov.
The recast of RoHS recast is therefore an important opportunity to translate this obligation into concrete action, all the more that electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) continues to create numerous problems during waste treatment.
(3b) Resolucija Sveta z dne 25. januarja 1988 o delovnem programu Skupnosti za boj proti onesnaževanju okolja s kadmijem 1 poziva Komisijo, naj brez odlašanja začne spremljati razvoj posebnih ukrepov za tak program.
( 3b ) The Council Resolution of 25 January 1988 on a Community action programme to combat environmental pollution by cadmium 1 invites the Commission to pursue without delay the development of specific measures for such a programme.
Varovati je treba tudi zdravje ljudi, zato je treba izvajati celovito strategijo, ki bo zlasti omejevala uporabo kadmija in spodbujala raziskave glede nadomestkov.
Human health also has to be protected and an overall strategy that in particular restricts the use of cadmium and stimulates research into substitutes should therefore be implemented.
Resolucija poudarja, da je treba uporabo kadmija omejiti na primere, kjer je uporaba primerna in kjer ni varnejših alternativ.
That Resolution stresses that the use of cadmium should be limited to cases where such use is suitable and where safer alternatives do not exist.
Sklicevanje na resolucijo Sveta iz leta 1988 (uvodna izjava 4 direktive RoHS) je treba ponovno vnesti, saj je to politična podlaga za boj proti onesnaževanju okolja s kadmijem.
The reference to the Council Resolution of 1988 (Recital 4 of current RoHS) should be reinstated as it is the political reference for combating environmental pollution by cadmium.
(3c) Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 14. novembra 1996 o sporočilu Komisije glede pregleda strategije Skupnosti o ravnanju z odpadki in osnutka resolucije Sveta o politiki pri ravnanju z odpadki 1 pozval Komisijo, naj predstavi predloge direktiv o številnih prednostnih tokovih odpadkov, vključno z električnimi in elektronskimi odpadki.
(3c) The European Parliament , in its resolution of 14 November 1996 on the communication from the Commission on the review of the Community Strategy on Waste Management and the draft Council resolution on waste policy 1 , asked the Commission to present proposals for directives on a number of priority waste streams, including electrical and electronic waste.
Sklicevanje na resolucijo Parlamenta iz leta 1996 (uvodna izjava 4 sedanje direktive RoHS) je treba vključiti, ker je to pomembno opozorilo, da je Parlament že leta 1996 zahteval konkretne omejitve prisotnosti polivinil klorida.
The reference to the Parliament Resolution of 1996 (Recital 4 of current RoHS) should be inserted as an important reminder that Parliament already asked for concrete restrictions on PVC back in 1996.