natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
27. opozarja na zaveze držav članic iz leta 2005 za doseganje cilja 0,7 % BND Evropske unije za uradno razvojno pomoč (ODA) leta 2015; meni, da je lahko podpora proračuna EU koristna spodbuda za pomoč državam članicam pri spoštovanju tega cilja; ponavlja svojo željo, da se Evropski razvojni sklad vključi zaradi povečanja preglednosti v splošni proračun skupaj s postopki odločanja, ki so spremljani in nadzorovani s strani Parlamenta;
Recalls the commitments made by the Member States in 2005 in view of reaching the target of 0,7 % of EU GNI for the official development assistance (ODA) in 2015; believes that the support of the EU budget can be a useful incentive to help the Member States to keep to this goal; reiterates its will to integrate the European Development Fund into the general budget so as to enhance transparency with its parliament-accompanied and -controlled decision-making procedures;
Delovni dokument o pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013: prvi odzivi
Working document on the 2007-2013 Multiannual Financial Framework review: first reflections
Mandat za pregled
The mandate for the review
Pregled proračuna izhaja iz sklepov Evropskega sveta iz decembra 2005 in poznejšega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, ki vzpostavlja nov finančni okvir.
The budgetary review finds its origin in the conclusions of the European Council of December 2005 and later, in the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA) setting up the new financial framework.
Izjava št. 1 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006
Declaration No 1 of the IIA of 17 May 2006
Izjava št. 3 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006
Declaration No 3 of the IIA of 17 May 2006
V skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta je bila Komisija pozvana, naj pripravi celovit in obsežen pregled, ki bo zajemal vse vidike porabe EU, vključno s skupno kmetijsko politiko, in sredstev EU, vključno z zmanjšanjem za Združeno kraljestvo, ter o tem poroča v letu 2008/2009.
In accordance with the conclusions of the European Council, the Commission has been invited to undertake a full, wide-ranging review covering all aspects of EU spending, including the Common Agricultural Policy, and of resources, including the United Kingdom rebate, and to report in 2008/2009.
Ta pregled mora spremljati ocena delovanja medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
That review should be accompanied by an assessment of the functioning of the Interinstitutional Agreement.
- ko Komisija predloži pregled, sledi faza preverjanja, v kateri se zagotovijo ustrezne razprave z Evropskim parlamentom na podlagi običajnega političnega dialoga med institucijami in ustrezno upoštevanje stališč Parlamenta;
- during the examination phase following the presentation of the review by the Commission, it will be ensured that appropriate discussions take place with the European Parliament on the basis of the normal political dialogue between the institutions and that the positions of the European Parliament are duly taken into account,
- Evropski svet v skladu s svojimi sklepi iz decembra 2005 „lahko sprejema odločitve o vseh zadevah, ki jih pregled obravnava“.
- in accordance with its conclusions of December 2005, the European Council 'can take decisions on all the subjects covered by the review'.
Parlament v resoluciji z druge obravnave
In its second reading resolution
P6_TA-PROV(2006)0570 o predlogu proračuna za proračunsko leto 2007:
P6_TA-PROV(2006)0570 of the 2007 Budget, the Parliament:
Za opredelitev področja uporabe in vsebine pregleda je treba razlikovati med:
In order to define the scope and contents of the review, a distinction should be made between:
- kratkoročnim pregledom medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (iz izjave 1 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma), ki je namenjen dodatnemu vrednotenju delovanja večletnega finančnega okvira in pomembnih predlogov Komisije;
- the short term review of the IIA (covered by declaration 1 of the IIA) which aims to proceed to an evaluation of the functioning of the MFF and relevant proposals by the Commission;
- vmesnim/dolgoročnim pregledom, ki vključuje financiranje po letu 2013 (iz izjave 3 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma) in je v skladu s „klavzulo o obsežnem pregledu“ iz sklepov Evropskega sveta.
- the mid/long term review preparing the financing after 2013 (covered by Declaration 3 of the IIA) corresponds to the "broad wide-ranging review clause" mentioned in the European Council conclusions.
Vključeval bi: reformo finančnega mehanizma, tj. lastnih sredstev in odhodkov, vključno s skupno kmetijsko politiko (sofinanciranjem), popustom za Združeno kraljestvo in zelo verjetno revizijo Pogodbe.
It would cover: a reform of the financing mechanism, i.e. Own Resources and of expenditure including the CAP (co-financing), the UK rebate and likely possible consequences implying a revision of the Treaty.
Komisija je 15. januarja 2007 objavila sporočilo predsednika o pregledu notranjega trga, pregledu stanja družbe in pregledu proračuna
On 15 January 2007, the Commission issued an "information note from the President on the review of the internal market, the social stocktaking and the budgetary review"
SEC(2007)42/2-05-1772 kot predhoden ukrep na podlagi svojih pooblastil (1. faza).
SEC(2007)42/2-05-1772 as a preliminary step in response to its mandate (phase1).
V tem dokumentu je določila potek dela in urnik pregleda.
In this paper, the Commission outlines the steps and the calendar of the review.
V posvetovanju bodo sodelovali Evropski parlament, Svet in države članice ter zainteresirane strani za politiko EU, ključni udeleženci na lokalni, regionalni in nacionalni ravni ter civilna družba.
The consultation will involve the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States but also the EU policies stakeholders, key actors at local, regional and national level and the civil society.
Komisija je predvidela, da bo tematski dokument, ki bi morali biti nared že junija, sprejet 12. septembra.
After having delayed it from June to September, the Commission has foreseen to adopt an Issue Paper on 12 September.
S tem bo na lastno odgovornost začela postopek posvetovanja (2. faza).
Doing so, the Commission will open the consultation process under its own responsibility (phase 2).
Obravnavana bodo problematična vprašanja, vendar bo dokument v skladu s svojim namenom ostal „odprtega“ značaja.
Problematic questions will be raised but the document will keep a purposely "open" character.
Tretja faza bo predstavitev bele knjige (na koncu leta 2008 ali v prvi polovici leta 2009), na kateri bodo temeljili predlogi za naslednji finančni okvir.
The third phase will be the presentation of a White Paper (end of 2008, first semester of 2009?) which should serve as a basis for the proposals for the next financial framework.
Bela knjiga bo pripravljena na posvetovalnem seminarju aprila in maja 2008, na katerem bodo sodelovali tudi predstavniki Evropskega parlamenta.
Apparently, the White Paper will be prepared by a brainstorming seminar in April-May 2008 in which the EP will be asked to participate.
Evropski parlament je ustanovil začasni odbor, ki je 8. junija 2005 sprejel končno poročilo, da je lahko Evropski parlament pravočasno oblikoval stališče še pred zasedanjem Evropskega sveta junija 2005, ki sklepa o zadevi ni sprejel.
The European Parliament had set up a Temporary Committee which adopted its final report on 8 June 2005, in time to set up EP's position before the European Council of June 2005 which finally failed to conclude on the matter.
Sprejetje sklepa Evropskega sveta je bilo preloženo na december 2005.
The decision of the European Council was postponed until December 2005.
Po skoraj dveh letih intenzivnih pogajanj sta bila 17. maja 2006 končno sprejeta večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 ter medinstitucionalni sporazum o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju.
After almost two years of intensive negotiations, the multiannual financial framework for the period 2007-2013 (MFF) and the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA) were finally agreed on 17 May 2006.
Parlament v resoluciji o sklenitvi medinstitucionalnega sporazuma poudarja, „da je bil sporazum, ki so ga tri institucije dosegle 4. aprila 2006, edini kompromis, ki ga je lahko Evropski parlament dosegel v sklopu pogajanj“, vendar priznava, da „je treba rešiti še številne pomanjkljivosti glede izida pogajanj“, ter „meni, da je treba te pomanjkljivosti obravnavati med pregledom 2008–2009 in, če je mogoče, med letnimi proračunskimi postopki.“
In its resolution on the conclusion of the IIA, the Parliament recalls "that the agreement reached by the three institutions on 4 April 2006 was the only compromise EP could achieve within the magnitude of the negotiations" but acknowledges that "a number of deficits are still unresolved in the outcome of the negotiations" and “considers that these deficits should be addressed in the 2008-2009 review and, where possible, in the course of the annual budgetary procedures."
Poročevalec želi poudariti, da se mora intenzivno notranje delo, ki ga je izvajal začasni odbor, ki razvija stališče Evropskega parlamenta glede najpomembnejših prednostnih nalog za obdobje 2001–2013, povezovati z do zdaj opravljenim delom ter postati podlaga za oceno, ki jo je treba izvesti, kot je poudaril Parlament v več resolucijah.
The rapporteur wishes to recall that the internal in-depth work, which has been carried out by the Temporary Committee setting up EP's position on the main priorities for the period 2007-2013, should therefore remain the reference of the work achieved so far as well as the basis for the assessment to be made, as underlined by the Parliament in various resolutions.
Poročevalec prav tako poudarja, da je med pogajanji ocenil, da je bila v zvezi z odgovornostjo EU potrebna zagotovitev dodatnega minimalnega zneska približno 12 milijard EUR.
He also recalls that during the negotiations, the rapporteur had estimated that an additional and minimum amount of approximatively 12 billion Euros was necessary to cover the need in relation with EU responsibility.
Evropski parlament je poudaril tudi potrebo po kakovostnih reformah.
EP also emphasized the need for qualitative reforms.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da imajo države članice in institucije manjše zadržke glede urnika in področja uporabe pregleda.
The rapporteur notes that some hesitation exists within the Member States and the institutions on both the timing and the scope of the review.
Zato je bil skeptičen v zvezi s predvidenim napredkom:
Therefore, he expresses some doubts about the foreseen developments:
- Ali urnik, ki ga je določila Komisija, ustreza splošni politični volji?
- does the calendar set up by the Commission correspond to the general political will?
- Ali ne bi bilo smiselno premisliti, ali je splošno ozadje negotovo in ali se lahko sedanje prednostne naloge spremenijo?
- would the wisdom not be to consider that the general context remains uncertain and that the current priorities might change?
- Ali je smiselno sprožiti politično razpravo o ambicioznem postopku, ki ga bosta morala sprejeti nova udeleženca (novi Parlament in nova Komisija)?
- is it reasonable to launch a political reflection on an ambitious process that will have to be decided by new actors (new Parliament new Commission)?
- Ali so sedanje okoliščine ugodne in dovolj zrele za začetek razprave o sedanjih glavnih politikah (skupna kmetijska politika ter kohezijska in raziskovalna politika) za obdobje po letu 2013?
- is the current context favourable and sufficiently ripe to open a discussion on the current major policies (CAP, Cohesion, Research) for the period after 2013?
Nadaljnji ukrepi
Next steps
Obsežen urnik
A complex calendar
Po dveh letih negotovosti je institucionalno prihodnost Evropske unije ponovno oživil Evropski svet junija 2007.
After two years of uncertainty, the institutional future of the European Union has been relaunched by the European Council of June 2007.
Sedemindvajset držav članic se je strinjalo, da pripravijo medvladno konferenco, na kateri se mora pripraviti revidirana pogodba na podlagi osnutka ustavne pogodbe.
The 27 Member States have agreed to call an Intergovernmental Conference which should prepare the Reformed Treaty out of the draft Constitution.
Če bodo postopki ratifikacije potekali po predvidevanjih, bi lahko revidirana pogodba začela veljati sredi leta 2009, tj. približno v času evropskih volitev.
If the ratification procedures go along as foreseen, the Reform Treaty could enter into force by mid 2009, more or less in parallel to the European elections.
Če bodo v postopku ratifikacije revidirane pogodbe napake, ne bo mogoče predvideti posledic za evropski projekt in proračun.
Should there be some failure in the ratification process of the Reformed Treaty, the consequences for the European project and Budget are not foreseeable.
Poročevalec meni, da se morajo v revizijskem postopku upoštevati nove okoliščine.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that the review process should take on board this new context.
Če se upošteva urnik iz sklepov Evropskega sveta, se morajo začetek veljavnosti nove pogodbe, volitve v nov Parlament junija 2009 in imenovanje nove Komisije zgoditi v drugi polovici leta 2009.
If the calendar foreseen by the conclusions of the European Council is respected, the entry into force of a new Treaty, the election of a new Parliament in June 2009 and the appointment of a new Commission should occur in the second part of the year 2009.
Zaradi tega utegnejo biti medinstitucionalne razprave v zvezi s pregledom prestavljene, s čimer bi se izognili zmedi.
In this context, the interinstitutional discussions on the review might be delayed to avoid any risk of confusion.
Januar–junij 2007
Jan - June 2007
Komisija predloži časovni načrt
Commission presents a road map
Komisija objavi tematski dokument
Commission publishes the Issue Paper
Julij–december 2008
Jul - Dec 2008
Postopek posvetovanja Komisije v zvezi s pregledom skupne kmetijske politike
Commission and Agriculture "health check" Consultation phase
Januar–junij 2009
Jan - June 2009
Volitve v Evropski parlament
EP elections
Posvetovalni seminar
Brainstorming seminar
Komisija predloži belo knjigo
Commission presents its White Paper
Sredina leta 2009
Mid 2009
Začetek veljavnosti revidirane pogodbe?
Entry into force of the Reform Treaty?
Julij–december 2009
Jul - Dec 2009
Nova Komisija
new Commission
Predstavitve imenovanih komisarjev
Hearings of designated Commissioners
Januar–junij 2010
Jan - June 2010
Komisija sprejme uradne predloge?
Commission adopts formal proposals?
Poleg revidirane pogodbe, ki bo prva prednostna naloga držav članic in institucij v naslednjih mesecih, bodo na pregled vplivali tudi drugi notranji in zunanji dejavniki, kot so „klavzula o poročanju in preverjanju“ v zvezi z reformo skupne kmetijske politike ter poročilo o koheziji v letu 2008, priprava svežnja energetske zakonodaje, revizija finančne uredbe, evropske volitve, nova Komisija ter večstranski sporazumi in naslednji krogi pogajanj Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
Apart from the Reform Treaty which will be the first priority of the Member States and of the institutions over the coming months, other internal and external factors will have an influence on the review, such as the "clause de rendez-vous" of the CAP Reform and the report on Cohesion in 2008, the preparation of the Energy package, the revision of the Financial Regulation, the European elections, the new Commission as well as multilateral agreements such as the next rounds up of WTO negotiations.
Pristop treh stebrov
A three pillars approach
Poročevalec meni, da mora pregled temeljiti na treh stebrih:
The rapporteur considers that the review should rely on three pillars:
- obravnavanje nerešenih zadev, o katerih ni bilo mogoče doseči ustreznega dogovora v pogajanjih v zvezi s sedanjim večletnim finančnim okvirom,
- the resolving of the left-overs which could not be sufficiently achieved in the negotiations of the current MFF,
- ocena vmesnega vrednotenja novih programov, kot predvidevata zakonodaja in analiza odobrenih reform,
- an assessment of the mid-term evaluation of the new programmes as foreseen in legislation and an analysis of the agreed reforms.
- priprava naslednjega VFO za obdobje po letu 2013.
- the preparation of the next MFF after 2013.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da so sprejeti skoraj vsi programi nove generacije, povezani z večletnim finančnim okvirom, čeprav jih je veliko preloženih zaradi težav pri sprejetju pravnih aktov.
The rapporteur notes that almost all the new generation of programmes linked to the 2007-2013 MFF have now been adopted although a number of them have been delayed following problems in the adoption of the legal acts.
Na sprejetje čaka le še nekaj programov (Galileo, Fiscalis, okvirni program za temeljne pravice in pravosodje; glejte tabelo v prilogi 2).
Only a few (Galileo, Fiscalis, framework programme on Fundamental Rights and Justice) are still pending (see table in annex 2).
Poročevalec v zvezi z nerešenimi zadevami ugotavlja, da je že v prvem letu sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira nastal primanjkljaj v razdelkih 1A in 4, ki ga bo treba odpraviti že med letnim postopkom v letu 2008.
Concerning the left-overs, the rapporteur notes that already during the first year of the current MFF, deficits can be observed in heading 1A and in heading 4 for which solutions will have to be found already during the 2008 annual procedure.
Za Evropski inštitut za tehnologijo in program Galileo je namreč v razdelku 1A potrebnih dodatnih 2,7 milijarde EUR za celotno obdobje.
An appropriate financing of the EIT and of Galileo requires an extra amount of 2.7 billion euros over the period under heading 1A.
Podobno velja za razdelek 4.
A similar situation exists under heading 4.
Čeprav je delegaciji Evropskega parlamenta med pogajanji uspelo povečati sredstva za razdelek 4 za eno milijardo, za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko še vedno ni dovolj denarja.
Although EP delegation succeeded to increase heading 4 by 1 billion during the negotiations, CFSP remains chronically underfunded.
V zvezi s razdelkom 3B bodo morda potrebna dodatna sredstva za druge potrebe.
Other needs might occur for heading 3B.
Opozoriti je treba, da je delegacija Evropskega parlamenta na trialogu 4. aprila 2006 zahtevala in dobila dodaten znesek 4 milijarde EUR, ki dopolnjuje znesek, ki ga je določil Evropski svet.
It should be reminded that at the trilogue of 4 April 2006, EP delegation asked for and obtained a supplementary amount of 4 billion euros over the amounts decided by the European Council.
V zvezi z vrednotenjem novih programov pravni akti predvidevajo, da se programi, ki so se začeli izvajati leta 2007, vmesno ovrednotijo okrog leta 2010.
Concerning the evaluation of the new programmes, the legal acts foresee that mid-term evaluations should take place around 2010 for those which have started in 2007.
Prva analiza bi se lahko izvedla ob približno istem času kot evropske volitve.
A first analysis could already take place around the European elections.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba izvesti natančno analizo uporabe sredstev EU v skladu z zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta za boljše izvrševanje proračuna in večjo kakovost.
The rapporteur considers that a serious analysis of the utilisation of EU funding should be made in this context in accordance with EP's request for a better implementation and qualitative improvement.
Na podlagi tega vrednotenja, za katero si mora Evropski parlament dejavno prizadevati glede na svoje proračunske in zakonodajne pristojnosti, bo morda treba prilagoditi predvidena proračunska sredstva za nekatere namene, vključno z uporabo zakonodajne prilagodljivosti (do 5 % proračuna programov, po potrebi pa tudi z večjo prilagodljivostjo v postavkah in med njimi).
On the basis of these evaluations to which EP should actively contribute in its capacity of budgetary and legislative authority, adjustments to the financial envelopes might be needed, including through the use of the legislative flexibility (up to 5 % of the envelope of the programmes and, if needed, more flexibility within and across headings.)
Medinstitucionalni sporazum o proračunski disciplini poleg tega vsebuje veliko novih instrumentov, ki jih je Evropski parlament podprl v pogajanjih.
Moreover, the IIA on budgetary discipline contains a number of new instruments supported by the EP during the negotiations.
Delovanje in dodano vrednost teh instrumentov (solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije, evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad, rezervna sredstva za nujne primere, instrumenti prilagodljivosti, finančni instrumenti v sodelovanju z EIB) je treba prav tako vključiti v vmesno oceno.
The functioning and added value of these instruments (EUSF, EAGF, Emergency Reserve, Flexibility instruments, financial instruments in cooperation with EIB) should also be part of this mid-term assessment.
Poročevalec v zvezi s tretjim stebrom, tj. pripravo naslednjega finančnega okvira, meni, da je pri določanju urnika treba nujno preprečiti, da bi se zgodilo kaj podobnega kot pri pripravi prejšnjega finančnega okvira; tedanje dogajanje je Parlament zelo kritiziral, saj je sprožilo nezaupanje v „legitimnost“ svežnja ukrepov, ki ga je pripravila Komisija pod vodstvom Prodija in potrdila Komisija pod vodstvom Barrosa, ne da bi po evropskih volitvah prilagodila prednostne naloge.
As far as the third pillar is concerned, i.e. the preparation of the next financial framework, the rapporteur considers that it is of paramount importance that the calendar aims to avoid to repeat the situation which occurred last time and which was highly criticised by the Parliament, putting in question the "legitimacy"of the Prodi package prepared by a going Commission and endorsed by the Barroso Commission without adjusting the priorities after the European elections.
Če se na medvladni konferenci potrdijo finančne določbe ustave, mora večletni finančni okvir postati del pogodbe in trajati vsaj pet let.
Assuming the fact that the financial provisions of the Constitution are confirmed by the IGC, the multiannual financial framework should be part of the Treaty with a duration of "at least five years".
Tako bi lahko nova Komisija in novoizvoljeni Parlament predloge za novi večletni finančni okvir uporabila kot delovni program na predstavitvah novembra 2009.
Therefore it could be envisaged to use the proposals for the next MFF as a work programme for the new Commission and the newly elected Parliament in the context of the hearings to be held in November 2009.
To bi pomenilo, da utegne biti sedanji večletni finančni okvir podaljšan, nekateri večletni programi pa spremenjeni na podlagi temeljitega in ambicioznega pregleda ter potrebnih prilagoditev do leta 2015, kar bi v prihodnje zagotovilo porazdelitev pristojnosti Parlamenta in Komisije.
This option could imply a prolongation of the current MFF and possibly some adjustments to some multiannual programmes, based on a sufficient and ambitious review and necessary adjustments until 2015, and would allow in future to ensure a phasing with the mandates of the Parliament and the Commission.
Pregled, kot je razložen v izjavi iz medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, zajema odhodke in prihodke EU.
The review, as described in the IIA Declaration, covers both the EU expenditure and revenues.
Na pobudo Parlamenta je bil na področju prihodkov v zadnjih mesecih dosežen napredek.
Concerning the revenue side, progress has been made at Parliaments' initiative over the last months.
Lamassourjevo poročilo
The Lamassoure report
Sprejeta besedila P6_TA(2006)0210 . na podlagi ugotovitve, da sedanji sistem ne deluje, predlaga sprejetje odločitve z dvofaznim pristopom: v prvi fazi je treba priznati, da je potreben pregleden in pošten sistem, v drugi pa opredeliti nove možnosti za lastna sredstva EU.
Texts adopted P6_TA (2006)0210 , after observing that the current system does not work, proposes a two-step approach converging into one decision: to acknowledge the need for a transparent and fair system in a first phase, and to define new options for EU Own Resources in a second phase.
Možnosti bodo opredeljene in predlagane v drugi fazi.
Options will be defined and proposed at a second phase.