natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Treba je ohraniti načelo pogodbene svobode in krepiti samoodgovornost potrošnika.
The principle of freedom to enter into contracts should be maintained, and the personal responsibility of consumers should be increased.
Več predpisov ne pomeni nujno tudi večje zaščite potrošnikov.
Increased regulation does not automatically mean better consumer protection.
Ti vidiki v vseh delih skupnega stališča niso uravnoteženo upoštevani.
Not all parts of the common position take account of these aspects and succeed in striking the right balance with regard to them.
Nekateri so preobsežni, birokratski ter deloma preveč zapleteni in težko razumljivi.
Many are too extensive and bureaucratic, and some are too complex and difficult to understand.
To je lahko zaradi kompromisne rešitve Sveta in vztrajanja držav članic pri svojih posebnih predpisih, ni pa pravo merilo in ne more biti smernica Evropskega parlamenta.
This may be attributable to the need to arrive at compromises within the Council and the insistence of Member States on their own specific rules, but it is not the right approach and cannot be the one which guides the European Parliament.
Obravnavati je treba naslednje spremembe:
The following amendments call for comment:
Svoje predpise lahko uporabijo že za kredite od 100 EUR in to mejo kadar koli prilagodijo denarnim razmeram in prihodkom, ne da bi bilo zato treba evropsko direktivo spremeniti.
For example, Member States may already apply their rules to credits from € 100 credits upwards, and they may at any time adjust this threshold in the light of monetary circumstances and incomes in their territory without its being necessary to amend the European directive.
Predpisi za oglaševanje so nejasni in pretirani, zlasti ker hkrati velja tudi Direktiva 2005/29/ES o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah.
The provisions concerning advertising are unclear and seem excessive, particularly as Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices also applies.
Zahteve po predpogodbenih in pogodbenih informacijah so preobsežne.
The pre-contractual and contractual information requirements are excessive.
Zakonodaje na tem področju ni mogoče smiselno uskladiti kar z združitvijo vseh obstoječih zahtev držav članic, ker bi prišlo do prekomerne ureditve in poplave informacij.
It is not desirable to harmonise this field of the law in such a way as to lump together all the requirements that exist in Member States.
Zato je še toliko bolj pomembno, da ima potrošnik pravico do preklica.
This would inevitably result in over-regulation and information overload, and the point is further borne out by the fact that consumers have a right of withdrawal.
To velja zlasti pri kreditih za prekoračitve.
This is particularly true of overdraft facilities.
Poleg informacij predpisana pojasnila lahko močno ovirajo notranji trg, po eni strani, ker lahko države članice te predpise različno izvajajo, in po drugi, ker jih kreditodajalec pri čezmejnem in elektronskem poslovanju komaj lahko izpolnjuje in ga zato lahko odvrnejo od ponudbe čezmejnih kreditov.
The additional explanations required concerning the information could substantially hamper the internal market, on the one hand because the Member States concerned might transpose the provisions differently and on the other hand because they would be too much for creditors to cope with, particularly in the case of cross-border transactions, but also in the case of electronic transactions, and the rules could well deter creditors from providing cross-border credit.
Iz tega razloga in glede na samoodgovornost potrošnikov bi se morala takšna pojasnila navesti le na zahtevo potrošnika.
For this reason, and also on account of the individual responsibility of consumers, these explanations should only have to be provided at the consumer's request.
Pri pravici do preklica se mora določiti rok zapadlosti.
The right of withdrawal should be subject to a lapse date.
Zaradi številnih pogojev, ki jih morajo dajalci kredita izpolnjevati, lahko pri sklenitvi pogodbe in pouku o preklicu pride do napak, ki niso storjene namenoma, marveč po pomoti.
In view of the numerous rules with which businesses will be required to comply, errors may occur when concluding a contract and providing information about the right of withdrawal, although these errors are due not to dishonest intentions but purely to an oversight by the entrepreneur.
Konec koncev velja direktiva tudi za podjetja brez izkušenj s kreditnim poslovanjem.
After all, the directive will also apply to entrepreneurs who do not have experience of credit transactions.
Poleg tega lahko te napake potrošnika spodbudijo k zlorabi.
Such mistakes could also mislead consumers into committing abuses.
6 mesecev po sklenitvi pogodbe s pravnega vidika zato ne bi smelo biti težav.
6 months after the conclusion of the contract, the legal position should therefore become incontestable.
S stališča Komisije je predčasno odplačilo skupaj z nadomestilom predstavljalo pomemben modul, ki ga je bilo treba uskladiti.
From the point of view of the Commission, early repayment and compensation were an element which it was important to harmonise.
Kompromis, ki ga s tem v zvezi predlaga Svet, je zapleten in ne ponuja veliko.
The compromise which the Council has reached on the subject could hardly be more complicated, and does not help matters much.
Zaradi velikih razlik med tradicijami in pravnim pojmovanjem posameznih držav članic je razumljivo, da je prepričljiv kompromis težko doseči.
In view of the major differences in the traditions and legal doctrines of the individual Member States, it is understandable that it might be impossible to arrive at any convincing compromise on this.
Predlagana rešitev je popolnoma neustrezna, saj učinka na delovanje notranjega trga (uskladitve) ni.
However, the solution which has been proposed is thoroughly unsatisfactory and does not appear likely to produce any effect on the internal market (harmonisation).
Način izračuna morebitnega nadomestila je nejasen in nedorečen.
The nature of the calculation of any compensation is formulated unclearly and remains open.
Prezre se lahko tudi do 10 000 EUR nadomestila letno.
Up to € 10 000 per annum, it is possible to avoid compensation altogether.
Kot edino skupno pravilo velja, da se v primeru odobrenega nadomestila, ne glede na to, kako se izračuna, lahko zahteva največ 0,5 % ali 1 % predčasno odplačanega zneska.
The only common rule worthy of the name remains that which lays down that, if compensation is permitted, and no matter how it is calculated, not more than 0.5% or 1% of the early repayment may be demanded.
Na podlagi tega in tudi zato, ker ta omejitev ni ustrezna, je edina prava rešitev, da se določba o nadomestilu v celoti črta in prepusti v pristojnost držav članic.
Against this background and because this limit is not necessarily the right one, the more honest solution would seem to be to completely delete the provisions on compensation, thus leaving the matter to the discretion of the Member States.
Poročevalec želi z naknadnimi predlogi sprememb izboljšati skupno stališče Sveta, in sicer s strožjimi in jasnejšimi predpisi ter vzpostavitvijo primernega ravnovesja med različnimi vidiki.
The rapporteur considers that the remaining amendments improve the common position by making the provisions clear and concise and that they strike an appropriate balance among the various aspects.
Približevanje zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi s potrošniškimi krediti (razveljavitev Direktive 87/102/EGS)
Harmonisation of the Member States’ legislation on credit for consumers (repeal of Directive 87/102/EEC)
o skupnem stališču Sveta do z namenom sprejetja direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktive 97/67/ES glede dokončnega oblikovanja notranjega trga poštnih storitev v Skupnosti
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktive 97/67/ES glede dokončnega oblikovanja notranjega trga poštnih storitev v Skupnosti
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (13593/6/2007 – C6–0410/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (13593/6/2007 – C6‑0410/2007 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 17.7.2007, P6_TA(2007)0336 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0594 ),
Texts adopted, 11.7.2007, P6_TA(2007)0336 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0594 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0505/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0505/2007 ),
Poštne storitve v EU so trenutno zajete v poštni direktivi iz leta 1997 (97/67/ES).
Postal Services in the EU are currently covered by the 1997 Postal Directive (97/67/EC).
Direktiva je vzpostavila regulativni okvir, ki zagotavlja državljanom univerzalno storitev in obenem omejuje obseg rezerviranega področja (prvotno pošta, lažja od 350 gramov, spremenjeno leta 2002 na 100 gramov in 1. januarja 2006 znižano na 50 gramov).
This created a regulatory framework which guarantees citizens a universal service, while gradually limiting the scope of the reserved area (initially mail under 350 grams, amended in 2002 to 100 grams and reduced on 1 January 2006 to 50 grams).
Namen direktive je s postopnim odpiranjem trga, ki naj bi bil popolnoma odprt leta 2009, zagotoviti najboljšo možno storitev.
The Directive aims at ensuring the best possible service through a gradual opening of the market, with a final target set for full opening in 2009.
Direktiva vključuje zahtevo, da mora Komisija zagotoviti redna poročila o izvajanju direktive in pred koncem leta 2006 potrditi, ali je datum 2009 še ustrezen.
It includes a requirement that the Commission should provide periodic reports on its implementation, and, before the end of 2006, confirm whether the 2009 date remains appropriate.
Komisija je oktobra 2006 na podlagi možnostne študije o vplivu dokončnega oblikovanja notranjega poštnega trga na univerzalno storitev predložila sedanji predlog za spremembo direktive 97/67/ES.
Based on a prospective study on the impact on universal service of the full accomplishment of the postal internal market, the Commission in October 2006 put forward the present proposal for amendment of Directive 97/67/EC.
Predlog potrjuje 1. januar 2009 kot datum, do katerega naj bi nacionalni izvajalci ne imeli več monopola nad pošto, lažjo od 50 gramov.
The proposal confirms 1st of January 2009 as the date, by which national operators would no longer have a monopoly on mail below 50 grams.
Sedanja obveznost držav članic, da zagotovijo visoko kakovostno in dostopno univerzalno storitev, bi še vedno veljala.
The current obligation on Member States to ensure a high-quality and affordable universal service would remain.
Komisija predlaga številne spremljevalne ukrepe, katerih namen je zaščititi univerzalno storitev, kot je ukinitev obvezne predhodne navedbe izvajalcev in stroškovno naravnanih tarif.
The Commission proposes a number of accompanying measures, which aim to safeguard the universal service, such as abolishment of mandatory ex-ante designation of providers and cost-oriented tariffs.
Glede financiranja morebitnih neto stroškov, ki izhajajo iz zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve, Komisija pojasnjuje številne nadomestne možnosti, vendar dopušča državam članicam svobodo, da izberejo metodo, ki je najbolj prilagojena njihovim posebnim razmeram.
As regards the financing of possible net-costs arising from universal service provision, the Commission clarifies a number of alternatives but leaves Member States the freedom to choose the method that is best adapted to their particular situation.
Prva obravnava EP
EP First Reading
Vaš poročevalec je od začetka zakonodajnega postopka podpiral temeljne cilje predloga Komisije.
Your rapporteur has supported the core objectives of the Commission's proposal from the beginning of the legislative procedure.
Določitev dokončnega in nepreklicnega datuma za dokončno oblikovanje notranjega trga poštnih storitev je posebnega pomena, ker bo odprtje trga omogočilo večjo konkurenčnost in tako izboljšalo raven storitev v smislu kakovosti, cen in izbire na voljo potrošnikom.
The determination of a fixed and irrevocable date for the completion of the internal market in postal services is of particular importance, since market opening will provide for greater competition and thus improve service levels in terms of quality, price and choice available to consumers.
Ustvarilo bo tudi pogoje za večjo rast in zaposlitev v tem sektorju.
It will also create the conditions for increased growth and employment in this sector.
Vendar številni vidiki predloga zahtevajo pojasnitev ali natančno prilagajanje.
However, several aspects of the proposal require clarification or fine-tuning.
Med celotno fazo prve obravnave je vaš poročevalec obširno razpravljal s sodelavci tako v Odboru za promet kot v odborih, ki so podali mnenje, da bi prišel do kompromisne rešitve številnih ključnih vprašanj.
Throughout the first reading stage, your rapporteur had extensive discussions with colleagues both in the Transport Committee and the opinion-giving committees with a view to finding compromise solutions on a number of key issues.
Sčasoma so se pogajanja zaključila s sporazumnim svežnjem, ki ga je velika večina podprla v glasovanju na plenarnem zasedanju julija 2007.
The negotiations eventually resulted in a compromise package, which was supported by a large majority at the vote in plenary in July 2007.
Najpomembnejši elementi stališča EP v prvi obravnavi so naslednji:
The most significant elements of the EP's position in first reading are as follows:
Tako bodo izvajalci in regulativni organi v državah, ki zaostajajo pri postopku liberalizacije, imeli več časa za prilagoditev.
This way, operators and regulators in countries that are lagging behind in the liberalisation process will have more time to adjust.
Da bi preprečili izkrivljanje razmer na trgu in nelojalno konkurenco, naj bi tiste države članice, ki so odprle svoje trge, imele možnost zavrniti dovoljenje izvajalcem, ki jih še vedno ščiti nacionalni monopol (rezervirano področje) v drugi državi članici.
- Reciprocity : In order to avoid market distortion and unfair competition, those Member States having opened their markets should be able to refuse authorisation to operators still being protected by a national monopoly (reserved area) in another Member State.
Poleg tega je pomembno ohraniti dobro delujoča poštna omrežja z zadostnim številom dostopnih točk na podeželju ter oddaljenih ali redko naseljenih območjih, da se izpolni obveznost zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve.
Moreover, it is important to maintain well-functioning postal networks with a sufficient number of access points in rural, remote or sparsely populated regions in order to satisfy the universal service obligation.
– Pri postopku odpiranja trga je treba na splošno upoštevati socialni vidik .
- Social considerations should, in general, be taken into account in the process of market opening.
Zlasti naj bi države članice v postopkih za pridobitev dovoljenja upoštevale delovne razmere.
In particular, Member States should be able to reflect working conditions in their authorisation procedures.
Države članice morajo tudi imeti pravico, da določijo pogoje za zagotavljanje poštnih storitev zaradi neekonomskih razlogov, kot je skladnost s pogoji zaposlovanja in shemami socialnega zavarovanja, ki jih določa zakon in/ali kolektivna pogodba, o kateri so se dogovorili nacionalni socialni partnerji.
Member States must also have the right to impose conditions on the supply of postal services for non-economic reasons, such as compliance with employment conditions and social security schemes laid down by law and/or by collective agreement negotiated between national social partners.
Komisija poda napotke za izračun neto stroškov.
The Commission should provide guidance on the calculation of net costs.
Vaš poročevalec je zadovoljen, da je Svet v svoje skupno stališče vključil glavne elemente stališča Evropskega parlamenta, kot so opisani zgoraj.
Your rapporteur is pleased that Council incorporated all the major elements of the European Parliament's position as outlined above into its Common Position.
Svet je uvedel nekatere spremembe glede strukture direktive, vendar te ne vplivajo na bistvo glavnih predlogov sprememb, ki jih je uvedel Parlament.
Some modifications were made by the Council as regards the Directive's structure, but these do not affect the substance of the major amendments introduced by Parliament.
Poleg tega vaš poročevalec pozdravlja izrecno imenovanje držav, ki bi lahko odložile popolno odprtje trga do konca leta 2012, v skladu s skupnim stališčem, in vključitev smernic o izračunu neto stroškov v direktivo v obliki nove priloge.
Furthermore, your rapporteur welcomes that according to the Common Position, the countries which may postpone full market opening until the end of 2012 are now named explicitly and that the guidance on the calculation of net costs becomes part of the Directive in form of a newly introduced Annex.
Vaš poročevalec ceni, da je Svet potrdil sporazum, dosežen v Parlamentu, in zato priporoča, da se skupno stališče odobri nespremenjeno.
Your rapporteur appreciates the Council's endorsement of the compromise reached in Parliament and therefore recommends that the Common Position be approved without amendment.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 95/50/ES v zvezi s Komisiji podeljenimi izvedbenimi pooblastili
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 95/50/EC as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0509 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0509 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 71 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0278/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 71 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0278/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0506/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0506/2007 ),
Direktiva 94/55/ES določa enotne varnostne predpise za prevoz nevarnega blaga po cesti.
Directive 94/55/EC lays down uniform safety rules for the transport of dangerous goods by road.
Direktiva bo preklicana in nadomeščena z direktivo o prevozu nevarnega blaga v notranjem prometu, o kateri je Parlament 5. septembra 2007 sprejel stališče v prvi obravnavi.
This Directive will be repealed and replaced by the forthcoming Directive on the inland transport of dangerous goods, on which Parliament adopted its first reading position on 5 September 2007.
Postopki kontrol cestnega prevoza nevarnega blaga, ki jih morajo izvajati države članice, so določeni v ločenem delu zakonodaje in sicer v direktivi 95/50/ES.
The procedures for checks to be carried out by Member States on the transport of dangerous goods by road are laid down in a separate piece of legislation, namely in Directive 95/50/EC.
Vsaka država članica pošlje Komisiji za vsako koledarsko leto poročilo o izvajanju direktive, sestavljeno v skladu z vzorcem iz priloge III.
Each Member State shall send the Commission for each calendar year a report on the application of the Directive, drawn up in accordance with the model in Annex III.
S členoma 9a in 9b direktive 95/50/ES se Komisiji podelijo nekatera izvedbena pooblastila v zvezi s prilagoditvijo prilog direktive znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku, ob upoštevanju morebitnih sprememb direktive 94/55/ES.
Articles 9a and 9b of Directive 95/50/EC confer certain implementing powers to the Commission in respect of the adaptation of the Directive's Annexes to scientific and technical progress, taking into account possible amendments to Directive 94/55/EC.
Komisija trenutno ta prenesena izvedbena pooblastila izvaja v skladu s tako imenovanim „regulativnim postopkom“, ki ji omogoča, da sklepe uveljavi tudi ob nasprotovanju Parlamenta.
At present, the Commission exercises these delegated implementing powers in accordance with the so-called 'regulatory procedure', which allows it to proceed with decisions, even if the Parliament opposes them.
Julija 2006 je bil z revizijo sklepa Sveta št. 1999/468/ES uveden nov postopek komitologije, „regulativni postopek s pregledom“.
In July 2006 a new comitology procedure, the 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny', was introduced through a revision of Council Decision 1999/468/EC.
Novi postopek znatno povečuje pravice Evropskega parlamenta, ki lahko osnutek izvedbenega ukrepa ne le pregleda, temveč mu v določenih okoliščinah tudi nasprotuje ali predlaga spremembe.
The new procedure significantly increases the European Parliament's rights, as it may not only scrutinise a draft implementing measure, but also, under certain conditions, oppose a draft measure or propose amendments.
Novi postopek naj bi se uporabljal za ukrepe splošnega obsega, s katerimi se spreminjajo nebistveni elementi temeljnega akta, sprejetega v skladu s postopkom soodločanja.
The new procedure should be applied to measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the co-decision procedure.
Ker šteje prilagoditev prilog k direktivi 95/50/ES za ukrep splošnega obsega, s katerim se spreminjajo nebistveni elementi, Komisija predlaga, da se določbe o komitologiji v direktivi uskladijo z zgoraj navedenim sklepom Sveta, obstoječi postopek („regulativni postopek“) pa nadomesti z novim „regulativnim postopkom s pregledom“.
Since the adaptation of the Annexes to Directive 95/50/EC must be considered as measures of a general scope designed to amend non-essential elements, the Commission proposes to bring the comitology provisions of the Directive in line with the above Council Decision and thus to replace the existing procedure ('regulatory procedure') by the new 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny'.
Po mnenju poročevalca se priloge dotikajo vsebine direktive, ki jo povezana s postopki preverjanja skladnosti.
In your rapporteur's view, the Annexes touch upon the Directive's substance relating to procedures for compliance checks.
Njihovo prilagoditev mora zato natančno pregledati Parlament.
Their adaptation would therefore need to be closely scrutinised by Parliament.
Poročevalec torej odobrava predlog Komisije in predlaga, da se ga odobri brez sprememb.
Your rapporteur thus welcomes the Commission's proposal and suggests that it be approved without amendment.
Sprememba Direktive 95/50/ES v zvezi s Komisiji podeljenimi izvedbenimi pooblastili
Amendment of Directive 95/50/EC as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
o pobudi Republike Avstrije z namenom sprejetja sklepa Sveta o izboljšanju sodelovanja med posebnimi enotami za posredovanje držav članic Evropske unije v kriznih situacijah
on the initiative of the Republic of Austria with a view to adopting a Council decision on the improvement of cooperation between the special intervention units of the Member States of the European Union in crisis situations
– ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Avstrije (15437/2006),
– having regard to the initiative of the Republic of Austria (15437/2006)
– ob upoštevanju členov 30, 32 in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU,
– having regard to Articles 30, 32 and 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0058/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0058/2007 ),