natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kar zadeva praktično stran odnosov, je Evropski parlament predlagal nadaljnje razvijanje in sistematiziranje sodelovanja med posameznimi odbori na vseh področjih evropskega združevanja, med drugim na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike, gospodarske in monetarne unije, območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter ustavnih zadev
As regards the practical side of relations, it proposed that cooperation between the parliamentary committees of the national parliaments and the European Parliament in all European integration-related sectors should be developed and placed on a systematic footing, not least in the areas of the common foreign and security policy, Economic and Monetary Union, the area of freedom, security and justice and constitutional affairs
Odstavek 13 resolucije. .
Paragraph 13 of the resolution. .
V protokolih o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov v Evropski uniji in o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki sta priložena ustavni pogodbi, je bila nacionalnim parlamentom prvič priznana možnost, da lahko dosežejo pregled zakonodajnega predloga z ozirom na upoštevanje načela subsidiarnosti, če sodeluje ena tretjina parlamentov (postopek z „rumenim kartonom“).
In the protocols annexed to the Constitutional Treaty dealing with the role of the national parliaments in the European Union and the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality for the first time the national parliaments were given the possibility of securing a review of a legislative proposal in respect of its compliance with the subsidiarity principle if one-third of the national parliaments submit reasoned opinions calling for such a review (‘yellow card’ procedure).
V enakih protokolih k lizbonski pogodbi, imenovani tudi reformna pogodba, je bila ta pravica dopolnjena z možnostjo, da lahko večina parlamentov in večina v Evropskem parlamentu kot tudi 55-odstotna večina članov Sveta zavrne zakonodajni predlog (postopek z „rdečim kartonom“).
In the same protocols annexed to the Lisbon Treaty, also referred to as the reform Treaty, this right was broadened to encompass the possibility of halting consideration of a legislative proposal on the basis of a call made by a majority of the national parliaments, a majority in the European Parliament and a majority of 55% of the members of the Council (‘red card’ procedure).
Ta novost se nanaša tudi na odnos Evropskega parlamenta do nacionalnih parlamentov, saj se mora Parlament držati roka osmih tednov, preden lahko zaključi posvetovanja o določenem predlogu, v tem času pa mora upoštevati prejeta utemeljena stališča.
This innovation also has a bearing on relations between the European Parliament and the national parliaments, since the former must allow a period of eight weeks to elapse before concluding its consideration of a proposal and must take account of reasoned opinions submitted during that period.
Poleg tega mora novemu stanju prilagoditi tudi svoj poslovnik.
In addition, it must bring its Rules of Procedure into line with the new situation.
Tudi če se bo praktični pomen te nove ureditve pokazal šele po začetku veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe, je z njo povezan tudi pomemben „simbolični pomen“, saj so nacionalni parlamenti prvič uradno priznani kot „akterji na ravni Evropske unije“.
Although the practical impact of the new arrangements will become clear only once the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force, their ‘symbolic’ significance should not be underestimated, since for the first time the national parliaments have been officially recognised as ‘players at Union level’.
Kakšne zaključke je mogoče izpeljati iz predstavljenega razvoja odnosov med Evropskim in nacionalnimi parlamenti?
What conclusions can be drawn from this survey of the way relations between the European Parliament and the national parliaments have developed?
Predvsem, da ni več nikakršnega antagonizma.
The first is that there is no longer any antagonism between the two sides.
Evropski parlament ni bil zgolj naklonjen vedno večji vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov, temveč jo je tudi aktivno podpiral.
The European Parliament has not just taken a benevolent view of the measures which have increased the importance of the role played by the national parliaments; it has actively supported the process.
Poleg tega so udeleženci spoznali, da lahko dosežejo večji parlamentarni nadzor nad izvršno oblastjo tako na ravni Unije kot na ravni držav članic samo z dopolnjevanjem svojega delovanja.
In addition, all those involved have recognised that it is only by joining forces that they can enhance parliamentary scrutiny of the executive at both Union and Member State levels.
Poslanci Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov sodelujejo z istimi ministri, bodisi v njihovi funkciji predstavnika vlade ali v njihovi funkciji predstavnika Sveta.
The Members of the European Parliament and of the national parliaments have to deal with the same ministers, whether in their capacity as representatives of national governments or in their capacity as representatives of the Council of Ministers.
Pri tem morajo oboji preprečevati podvajanje dejavnosti in tekmovalnost.
Duplication of work and rivalries are of no use to either side.
Odnose je treba uresničevati v sodelovanju, ki mora biti bolj strukturirano, vendar ne tudi nujno bolj formalizirano.
Relations between the European Parliament and the national parliaments must take the form of cooperation which is more structured, but not necessarily more formalised.
Osnutek resolucije pred tem besedilom vsebuje številne praktične predloge v ta namen.
The motion for a resolution preceding this text contains a number of practical proposals as to how this might be brought about.
Po drugi strani pa medparlamentarno sodelovanje ne sme voditi v vmešavanje v pravice parlamentov v zvezi z njihovimi pristojnostmi odločanja.
On the other hand, interparliamentary cooperation must not encroach on parliaments' decision-making powers.
Vsaka oblika medparlamentarnega sodelovanja bi morala biti po svoji naravi posvetovalna in ne bi smela vsebovati nobenih odločitev z ozirom na obstoječe cikle odločanja Unije, opredeljena pa bi morala biti z obojestranskim priznavanjem parlamentov in poslancev kot ogledala družbe
Any form of interparliamentary cooperation should be deliberative by nature, non-decisive with regard to the existing EU policy cycles and characterised by mutual recognition of parliaments and parliamentarians as mirrors of society
o razvoju odnosov med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti na podlagi lizbonske pogodbe
on the development of the relations between the European Parliament and national parliaments under the Treaty of Lisbon
– ob sklicevanju na mnenje Odbora za zunanje zadeve z dne 22. januarja 2008 o lizbonski pogodbi,
– recalling the opinion of its Foreign Affairs Committee of 22 January 2008 on the Treaty of Lisbon,
Medinstitucionalni dogovor 2006/C 139/01 in člen 41(3) PEU, kot je bil spremenjen z lizbonsko pogodbo. ;
Interinstitutional Agreement 2006/C 139/01 and Article 41(3) of the EU Treaty, as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. ;
8. izraža zadovoljstvo nad večjo proračunsko in nadzorno odgovornostjo glede SZVP in EVOP, ki jo bo dobil z začetkom veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe, in zlasti nad tem, da bo pred njim odgovoren podpredsednik/visoki predstavnik;
Looks forward to shouldering its own increased budgetary and scrutiny responsibilities with respect to the CFSP and the ESDP once the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force, and in particular the holding to account of the Vice-President/High Representative;
13. predlaga nadgradnjo polletnih konferenc predstavnikov nacionalnih parlamentarnih odborov in političnih skupin, na katerih bi s sogovorniki iz Evropskega parlamenta razpravljali o trenutnih in prihodnjih pomembnih vprašanjih s področja mednarodnih zadev ter opredelili jasne cilje s konkretnimi programi.
Proposes to upgrade the current biannual conferences of the spokesmen of the national parliamentary committees and political groups, so that they debate together with their counterparts in the European Parliament topics of current and future concern in international affairs and define clear objectives in the context of concrete programmes.
o razvoju odnosov med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti po lizbonski pogodbi
on the development of the relations between the European Parliament and national Parliaments under the Treaty of Lisbon
3. meni, da imajo nacionalni parlamenti ključno vlogo pri krepitvi politične legitimnosti politike razvojnega sodelovanja EU, saj usklajena prizadevanja vodijo k boljšim rezultatom in k učinkoviti uporabi uradne razvojne pomoči;
Believes that national parliaments play a crucial role in strengthening the political legitimacy of EU development cooperation policy as coordinated efforts lead to better results and efficient use of official development assistance (ODA);
5. izraža polno pripravljenost za sodelovanje z nacionalnimi parlamenti pri demokratičnem nadzoru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
Expresses its full readiness to work together with the national parliaments on the democratic scrutiny of the Development Cooperation Instrument.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj v zvezi z upravičenostjo do naložb v energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije pri stanovanjskih objektih
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of energy efficiency and renewable energy investments in housing
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0838 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0838 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj (A6‑0000/2009),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0134/2009 ),
(4) Za izpolnitev ciljev gospodarske in socialne kohezije iz člena 158 Pogodbe ES morajo biti ukrepi usmerjeni v gospodinjstva z nizkimi dohodki, kot jih opredeljuje veljavna nacionalna zakonodaja.
(4) In order to ensure that the objectives of economic and social cohesion as set out in Article 158 of the EC Treaty are met, interventions should target low-income households, as defined by the national legislation in force .
(4) Za izpolnitev ciljev kohezijske politike iz člena 158 Pogodbe ES morajo ukrepi podpirati socialno kohezijo.
(4) In order to ensure that the objectives of cohesion policy as set out in Article 158 of the EC Treaty are met, interventions should support social cohesion .
(4a) Evropsko računsko sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2007 priporočilo, naj bodo zakonodajni organi in Komisija pripravljeni ponovno pregledati zasnovo prihodnjih programov izdatkov s preučitvijo možnosti poenostavitve osnove za izračun upravičenih stroškov in povečanja uporabe povprečnin ali pavšalnih plačil namesto vračil „dejanskih stroškov“.
(4a) The European Court of Auditors recommended in its 2007 annual report that the legislative authorities and the Commission be prepared to reconsider the design of future expenditure programmes by giving due consideration to simplifying the basis of calculation of eligible cost and making greater use of lump - sum or flat - rate payments instead of reimbursement of "real costs".
(4b) Za zagotovitev potrebne poenostavitve poslovodenja, upravljanja in nadzora projektov, ki prejemajo nepovratno pomoč ESRR, zlasti v primeru sistema povračil, ki temelji na rezultatih, je smiselno dodati tri oblike upravičenih stroškov, namreč posredne stroške, povprečnine in pavšalne stroške na enoto standardnega obsega.
(4b) In order to ensure the necessary simplification in the management, administration and control of operations that receiv e an ERDF grant, particularly when linked to a result-based reimbursement system, it is appropriate to add three additional forms of eligible costs, namely, indirect costs, lump sums and flat-rate standard scales of unit cost.
(4c) Za zagotovitev pravne varnosti v zvezi z upravičenostjo izdatkov je treba te dodatne oblike upravičenih stroškov uporabljati za vso nepovratno pomoč iz ESRR.
(4c) In order to ensure legal certainty in relation to the eligibility of expenditure, these additional forms of eligible costs should be applicable to all grants from the ERDF.
Zato bo potrebna retroaktivna uporaba z učinkom od 1. avgusta 2006, kar je datum začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006.
Retroactive application should therefore be necessary with effect from 1 August 2006, which is the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006.
Člen 7 – odstavek 1 a
Article 7 – paragraph 1a
Vse države članice so upravičene do izdatkov za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti in uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov v obstoječih stanovanjskih objektih v korist gospodinjstev z nizkimi dohodki.
Expenditure on energy efficiency improvement and on the use of renewable energy in existing housing in favour of low-income households shall be eligible for all Member States .
V vseh državah članicah so izdatki za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti in uporabo energije iz obnovljivih virov v obstoječih stanovanjskih objektih upravičeni do vsote, ki ne presega 4 % skupne dodelitve ESRR.
In each Member State , expenditure on energy efficiency improvements and on the use of renewable energy in existing housing shall be eligible up to an amount of 4% of the total ERDF allocation .
V podporo socialni koheziji države članice v nacionalnih pravilih opredelijo kategorije upravičenih izdatkov za stanovanjske objekte v skladu s členom 56(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
Member States shall define categories of eligible housing in national rules, in conformity with Article 56(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, in order to support social cohesion.
(2a) Vstavi se naslednji odstavek:
( 2 a) The following paragraph shall be inserted:
Naslednji stroški so upravičeni do prispevka iz ESRR, kot je opredeljen v odstavku 1, če so nastali v skladu z nacionalnimi pravili, vključno z računovodskimi pravili, ter pod posebnimi pogoji, navedenimi spodaj:
The following costs shall be eligible for a contribution from the ERDF as defined in paragraph 1 provided that they are incurred in accordance with national rules, including accountancy rules, and under the specific conditions provided for below:
v primeru nepovratnih pomoči:
in the case of grants:
(i) posredni stroški, navedeni na pavšalni osnovi, do 20 % neposrednih stroškov projekta;
(i) indirect costs , declared on a flat-rate basis, of up to 20% of the direct costs of an operation;
(ii) pavšalni stroški, izračunani z uporabo stroška na enoto standardnega obsega, kakor ga opredeli država članica;
(ii) flat-rate costs calculated by application of standard scales of unit cost as defined by the Member State ;
(iii) povprečnine, ki zajemajo vse stroške ali del stroškov projekta.
(iii) lump sums to cover all or part of the costs of an operation.
Možnosti iz točk (i), (ii) in (iii) se lahko kombinirajo samo takrat, kadar vsaka od njih zajema različne kategorije upravičenih stroškov ali kadar so uporabljene za različne projekte v okviru istega ukrepa.
The options referred to in points (i), (ii) and (iii) may be combined only where each of them covers a different category of eligible costs or where they are used for different projects within the same operation.
Stroški iz točk (i), (ii) in (iii) se vnaprej določijo na podlagi poštenega, pravičnega in preverljivega izračuna.
The c osts referred to in point s (i), (ii) and (iii) shall be established in advance on the basis of a fair, equitable and verifiable calculation.
Povprečnina iz točke (iii) ne sme presegati 50.000 EUR.“
The lump sum referred to in point (i ii) shall not exceed EUR 50 000 ".
Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Člen 1(2a) te uredbe se uporablja z učinkom od 1. avgusta 2006.
Article 1( 2a ) of this Regulation shall apply with effect from 1 August 2006.
Evropska komisija je 26. novembra v odgovor na sedanjo finančno krizo in upočasnitev gospodarske rasti predstavila obsežen evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva.
On 26 November, in response to the ongoing financial crisis and slow-down in the European economy, the European Commission presented a wide-ranging Economic Recovery Plan for Europe.
Kohezijska politika kot največji vir naložb v realno gospodarstvo pomembno prispeva k temu načrtu.
EU Cohesion Policy, as the largest source of investments in the real economy, makes an important contribution to this plan.
Več kot 65 % njenih skupnih dodeljenih sredstev za obdobje 2007–2013 je že dodeljenih za naložbe v štiri prednostna področja lizbonske strategije za rast in delovna mesta.
More than 65% of its total allocation for the period 2007-2013 is already "earmarked" for investment in the four priority areas of the Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs.
Zato ni presenetljivo, da so bili za pospešitev dejanskega izvajanja projektov ter za povečanje zaupanja in okrepitev dinamike v gospodarstvu sprejeti zakonodajni in nezakonodajni ukrepi.
It comes as no surprise, therefore, that both legislative and non-legislative measures have been taken to help accelerate project implementation on the ground and build confidence and dynamism in the economy.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija predstavila predloge za revizijo treh obstoječih uredb o strukturnih skladih za obdobje 2007–2013: splošna uredba, uredba o evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) in uredba o socialnem skladu (ESS).
In this context, the Commission presented proposals to revise three of the current EU Structural Funds Regulations for the period 2007-2013: the General Regulation, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Regulation, and the European Social Fund (ESF) Regulation.
Na splošno je namen teh zakonodajnih sprememb izboljšati pretok denarnih tokov in likvidnost v državah članicah, omogočanje uporabe instrumentov finančnega inženiringa, poenostavljena in razširjena uporaba pavšalnih zneskov in povprečnin ter razširitev možnosti za podporo naložb v energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije pri stanovanjskih objektih.
In general terms, the purpose of these legislative changes is to improve cash flow and liquidity in the Member States, facilitate the use of financial engineering instruments, simplify and broaden the use of flat rate and lump-sum costs, and expand the possibilities for support to investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy in housing.
Predlog Komisije – uredba o ESRR
Commission proposal - ERDF Regulation
Komisija je vložila predlog spremembe k členu 7 („upravičenost izdatkov“) uredbe o ESRR (1080/2006), da bi vsem državam članicam in regijam EU omogočila vlaganje v ukrepe za energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije pri stanovanjskih objektih s podporo strukturnih skladov EU.
The Commission introduced one amendment to Article 7 ("Eligibility of Expenditure") of the ERDF Regulation (1080/2006) with the aim of enabling all EU Member States and regions to invest in energy-efficiency and renewable energy measures in housing with the support of the EU Structural Funds.
Zato se ESRR lahko uporablja za sofinanciranje nacionalnih, regionalnih ali lokalnih shem, na primer za namestitev dvojne zasteklitve, izolacije sten in solarnih modulov v gospodinjstvih ali za nadomestitev starih kotlov z energetsko učinkovitejšimi.
Consequently, ERDF may be used to co-finance national, regional or local authority schemes to install, for instance, double-glazing, wall insulation and solar panels in housing, or replace old boilers for more energy-efficient ones.
Ta ukrep se bo uporabljal v vseh državah članicah (EU-27), sprva pa je bil namenjen le za gospodinjstva z nizkim prihodkom.
This measure will apply to the whole EU-27, and was originally intended to be targeted only at low-income households.
Treba je poudariti, da v skladu s sedanjo uredbo ESRR že podpira posege v stanovanjskem sektorju, vključno z energetsko učinkovitostjo, vendar le v novih državah članicah (EU-12) in v skladu z nekaterimi pogoji.
It should be recalled that, under the current Regulation, the ERDF already supports interventions in the housing sector, including energy efficiency, but only for the new Member States (EU-12) and under several conditions.
V praksi bi se ESRR lahko uporabljal le za skupne dele stavb (ali za celo stavbo v primeru socialnih stanovanj) v ogroženih mestnih območjih.
In practical terms, the ERDF could only be used for common parts of a building (or the entire building in the case of social housing) in deprived urban areas.
Ta predlog ne povečuje sredstev in ne vpliva na proračun Skupnosti.
This proposal does not increase funding and has no implications for the Community budget.
Državam članicam zgolj omogoča, da lahko, če to želijo, spremenijo svoje prednostne naloge in reprogramirajo svoje operativne programe v prid financiranja ukrepov na tem področju.
It simply enables Member States, if they so wish, to shift their priorities and re-programme their Operational Programmes in order to finance actions in this field.
Kompromis Sveta o uredbi o ESRR
Council compromise on the ERDF Regulation
Svet je uspel doseči kompromis ob prvi obravnavi revizije uredbe o ESRR v zelo omejenem časovnem okviru.
The Council managed to reach a compromise at first reading on the revision of the ERDF Regulation within a very limited timeframe.
Delovna skupina Sveta za strukturne ukrepe se je pogajala o številnih spremembah predloga Komisije v stanovanjskem sektorju :
The Council's Working Party on Structural Measures negotiated a number of changes to the Commission proposal on housing , namely:
· odprava omembe gospodinjstev z nizkim prihodkom, ki je problematična, med drugim zaradi različnih opredelitev tega pojma v nacionalnih pravilih.
· The elimination of the reference to “low-income households”, which was problematic not least because of the different definitions of this term under national rules.
Namesto tega je navedeno, da bi morali posegi v stanovanjskem sektorju podpirati socialno kohezijo, pri tem pa naj države članice same natančno določijo kategorije upravičenih izdatkov za stanovanjske objekte,
Instead, it is stated that interventions in the housing sector should support social cohesion, leaving it to the discretion of the Member States to determine the exact categories of eligible housing.
· za izdatke držav članic za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti in uporabo obnovljivih virov energije pri stanovanjskih objektih je bila določena zgornja meja, in sicer 4 % skupne dodelitve ESRR.
· A ceiling of 4% of the total ERDF allocation for each Member State has been imposed on expenditure on energy efficiency improvements and on the use of renewable energy in existing housing.
Svet je ohranil razliko iz predloga Komisije, in sicer, da bi morala biti nova vrsta ukrepov v stanovanjskem sektorju na voljo vsem državam članicam EU, medtem ko bodo nove države članice (EU-12) še vedno lahko financirale druge vrste izdatkov za stanovanjski objekt v skladu z obstoječimi pravili o ESRR (v skupni vrednosti, ki ne presega 3 % dodelitve ESRR za zadevne operativne programe ali 2 % skupne dodelitve ESRR na nacionalni ravni).
The Council maintained the distinction contained in the Commission proposal, namely that this new type of interventions in the housing sector should be made available in all EU Member States, while “new” Member States (EU-12) will still be able to finance other types of housing expenditure under the exiting ERDF rules (and for a maximum amount of 3% of the ERDF allocation to the operational programmes concerned or 2% of the total ERDF allocation on a national level).
Skupni izdatki za stanovanjske objekte v vsaki državi članici, ki deluje v skladu z različnimi pravili in določbami, lahko dosežejo 6 % skupne dodelitve ESRR.
Total expenditure on housing in each of the new Member states, acting under different rules and provisions, could reach 6% of their total ERDF allocation.