natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· potrebo po enotnem pristopu med agencijami glede predstavitve njihovih dejavnosti med obravnavanim proračunskim letom ter predstavitve računov in poročil o proračunskem in finančnem upravljanju;
· the need for a standard approach among the agencies with regard to the presentation of their activities during the financial year in question, and of their accounts and reports on budgetary and financial management;
· enotno zahtevo za vse direktorje agencij, da pripravijo in podpišejo izjavo o zanesljivosti, vključno s pridržki, če je to potrebno;
· a standard requirement for all directors of agencies to draw up and sign a statement of assurance, including reservations where necessary;
· usklajen model, ki bi ga uporabljale vse agencije ter vsi decentralizirani organi in bi jasno razlikoval med
· a harmonised model applicable to all agencies and satellite bodies clearly distinguishing between
- finančnimi izkazi in poročilom o izvrševanju proračuna;
- financial statements and a report on the implementation of the budget;
- izjavo o zanesljivosti, ki jo podpiše direktor organa, skupaj z vsemi pridržki ali pripombami, za katere direktor meni, da je treba nanje opozoriti organ za podelitev razrešnice;
- a declaration of assurance signed by the body's director, together with any reservations or observations which the director considers it appropriate to draw to the attention of the discharge authority;
· potrebo po opredelitvi načel za ugotavljanje, ali in koliko so plačila vir financiranja za agencije.
· the need to define the principles for determining whether and to what extent fees and payments should be a source of funding for agencies;
· nujnost izvajanja rednih preverjanj potrebe po obstoječih agencijah in določitve meril za ugotavljanje, kdaj je regulativna agencija izpolnila svoj namen in se jo lahko razpusti.
· the need to conduct a rolling review of the need for existing agencies and to establish criteria to determine when a regulatory agency has fulfilled its purpose and can be wound up.
2. poudarja pomembno vlogo, ki jo lahko imajo regulativne agencije kot ločeni in pomožni organi institucij Skupnosti in držav članic s pravno osebo pri stalnem opravljanju posebnih nalog na področjih pristojnosti EU in pri sodelovanju znotraj EU;
Highlights the important role that regulatory agencies can play as distinct and auxiliary bodies of the Community institutions and the Member States with legal personality for the continuous performance of specific tasks in areas of EU competence and intra-EU cooperation;
Primer 9/56 Meroni proti Visoki oblasti [1957/58] ECR 133. , da morajo vedno spoštovati načelo sorazmernosti in, ko v skladu z njihovo nalogo obravnavajo vprašanja na področju deljene pristojnosti, načelo subsidiarnosti;
Case 9/56 Meroni v. High Authority [1957/58] ECR 133. and must at all times operate with respect for the principle of proportionality and, when their mission deals with issues in an area of shared competence, with respect for the principle of subsidiarity;
18. poziva k sodelovanju med regulativnimi agencijami v Evropski uniji in predlaga, da se v letnem horizontalnem poročilu o agencijah preuči možnost združevanja agencij s podobnimi odgovornostmi, da bi lahko delovale skupaj, ter odprave tistih agencij, ki nimajo več razloga za obstoj;
Calls for cooperation among regulatory agencies within the European Union and for consideration, in the annual horizontal report on the agencies, of the possibility of consolidating those agencies with similar responsibilities so that they can function jointly, as well as abolishing those that have lost their raison d'être ;
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. poudarja potrebo po uskladitvi vseh 29 obstoječih agencij in določitvi jasne strategije za nove agencije ali druge organe Skupnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj poda predlog za okvirno uredbo, ki določa jasna horizontalna pravila za njihovo ustanovitev, strukturo, delovanje, ocenjevanje in nadzor;
Stresses the need to align all 29 existing regulatory agencies as well as to set out a clear strategy for new agencies or other Community bodies; calls upon the Commission to put forward a proposal for a framework regulation establishing clear horizontal rules for their creation, structure, operation, evaluation and control;
Regulativna agencija
Regulatory agencies
MANDAT AGENCIJE
TERM OF THE AGENCY
Vir: KOM(2007)300v milijonih EUR
Source: COM(2007)300in Mio EUR
GLAVNA NALOGA
MAIN TASK
ENISAEvropska agencija za varnost omrežij in informacij
ENISAEuropean Network and Information Security Agency
predlog osnutka proračuna za leto 2008: 8,1
2008 PDB: 8.1
Naknadna ocena: 2007Odgovoren za ocenjevanje: Komisija
Main responsible for the evaluation: Commission
Nadzorni organ za evropski GNSS GALILEO
European GNSS Supervisory Authority GALILEO
še ni določen
To be decided
predlog osnutka proračuna za leto 2008: 10,5
2008 PDB: 10.5
Licenčni organ za načrt koncesije programa GALILEO– razvoj evropskega sistema GNSS
Licence authority for the GALILEO concession plan- Develops the European system GNSS
– zagotavljanje varnosti in certifikacije
- Ensure safety and certification
– upravljanje programa EGNOS
- Manage the EGNOS agreement
Odgovoren za ocenjevanje: organ
Main responsible for the evaluation: Authority
EECMAOrgan za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij
EECMAEuropean Electronic Communications Market Authority
(v pripravi)
(under consideration)
2009–(še ni določeno)
2009 - to be decided
še ni določeno
To be decided
Predlog Evropske Komisije:– izboljševanje skladnosti zakonodaje v EU
EC proposal:- Improve consistency of regulation in the EU
– večje sodelovanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in Komisijo
- Reinforce cooperation between the NRAs and the Commission
– ustanovitev strokovnega centra za regulativna vprašanja v povezavi s tržno analizo in zagotavljanjem storitev po celotnem ozemlju Skupnosti
- A14Create a centre of expertise for regulatory issues linked to market analysis and the provision of cross-Community services
ACERAgencija za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev
ACERAgency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators
Predlog Evropske Komisije:– pregled odločitev na podlagi posameznih primerov, ki so jih sprejeli nacionalni regulativni organi v čezmejnih zadevah, in zagotavljanje primernega sodelovanja med upravljavci omrežij
EC proposal:- review "on a case-by-case basis" decisions made by national regulators in cross-boarder issues and ensure adequate co-operation between network operators
EACIIzvajalska agencija za konkurenčnost in inovativnost
EACIExecutive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation
V splošnem proračunu: 9,9; iz programa Marco Polo: 0,8
Under the general budget: 9.9 Under the Marco Polo: 0.8
Mesta, ki so na voljo v skladu s proračunom Skupnosti: 36
Posts authorised under the Community budget: 36
– upravljanje programa Inteligentna energija – Evropa– upravljanje pobude o ekoloških inovacijah, mreže Enterprise Europe Network in programa Marco Polo
- Manage the IEE (Intelligent Energy Europe) programme- Manage the Eco-innovation initiative and the Enterprise Europe Network and the Marco Polo programme
ERCIzvajalska agencija Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta
ERCEuropean Research Council Executive Agency
Skupaj 7 PC: 231,3
Total 7 PC: 231,3
– evropski organ za financiranje, ustanovljen za podporo pionirskih raziskav na pobudo vlagateljev
- European funding body set up to support investor-driven frontier research
REAIzvajalska agencija Evropske Komisije za raziskave
REAResearch Executive Agency of the European Commission
Skupaj 7 PC: 251,8
Total 7 PC: 251,8
– upravljanje večjega dela 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (FP7)
- Manage a large part of the 7th Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (FP7)
Drugi organi Skupnosti
Other Community Bodies
PRORAČUN v milijonih EUR
BUDGET in Mio EUR
EITEvropski inštitut za tehnologijo
EITEuropean Institute of Innovation and Technology
še ni določen; Avstrija, Madžarska ali Poljska
To be decided between Austria, Hungary and Poland
predviden začetek delovanja v drugi polovici 2008
start planned 2nd half 2008
finančna sredstva Skupnosti: 308,7
Community Funding: 308.7
sestavljen bo iz več skupnosti znanja in inovacij ter glavne uprave, kjer bo zaposlenih 60 oseb
Will consist of several Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs) and a central administration of about 60 people
– pospešitev prenosa znanja za povečanje inovativnosti– pospešitev ustanavljanja novih raziskovalnih podjetij in osamosvojitve poslovnih enot
- Speed up knowledge-transfer to boost innovation- Promote the creation of research spin-offs and start-ups
Skupne tehnološke pobude
JTIsJoint Technology Initiatives
–FCH– Čisto nebo
- FCH- Clean Sky
odvisno od skupne tehnološke pobude
Depending on the JTI
– dolgoročno javno-zasebno partnerstvo– podpiranje obsežnih večnacionalnih razvojnih dejavnosti na področjih, ki so pomembna za evropsko industrijsko konkurenčnost, in zadev z velikim družbenim pomenom
- Long-term Public-Private Partnerships- Support large-scale multinational research activities in areas of major interest to European industrial competitiveness and issues of high societal relevance
Evropsko skupno podjetje za ITER & razvoj fuzijske energije
JU ITEREuropean Joint Undertaking for ITER & the Development of Fusion Energy
9 653, pri čemer je Euratom prispeval 7 649
9 653 with a contribution from Euratom of 7 649
2008: 145 delovnih mest (60 stalnih in 85 začasnih)
2008: 145 posts (60 permanent and 85 temporary)
– podpiranje projektov za pospešitev razvoja fuzijske energije kot čiste in trajnostne energije
- Supports projects to accelerate the development of fusion as a clean and sustainable energy
Skupno podjetje SESAR Upravljanje zračnega prometa
JU SESAR Air Traffic Management
Prispevek EU: 700
EU contribution: 700
2008: predvidenih 23 mest
2008: 23 posts planned
– razvoj nove generacije evropskega sistema upravljanja zračnega prometa, ki zagotavlja varnost in pretočnost zračnega prometa po vsem svetu v naslednjih 30 letih
- Develop the new generation air traffic management system capable of ensuring the safety and fluidity of air transport worldwide over the next 30 years.
o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2006 v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti
on ‘Better lawmaking 2006’ pursuant to Article 9 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ....................................9
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ..............9
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2005: uporaba načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti – trinajsto poročilo
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on better lawmaking 2005: application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality – 13th report
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o boljši pravni ureditvi v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on better regulation in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o strategiji za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o institucionalnih in pravnih vidikih uporabe instrumentov „mehkega prava“
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on institutional and legal implications of the use of ‘soft law’ instruments
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2006" v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti (štirinajsto poročilo) ( KOM(2007)0286 ),
– having regard to the Commission report entitled ‘“Better lawmaking 2006” pursuant to Article 9 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality (14th report) ( COM(2007)0286 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "Drugi strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji" ( KOM(2008)0032 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Second strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union’ ( COM(2008)0032 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije "Drugo poročilo o napredku glede strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2008)0033 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document entitled ‘Second progress report on the strategy for simplifying the regulatory environment’ ( COM(2008)0033 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "Takojšnji ukrepi za leto 2008 za zmanjšanje upravnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji " ( KOM(2008)0141 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘2008 Fast Track Actions to reduce administrative burdens in the European Union’ ( COM(2008)0141 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije "Zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji – Poročilo o napredku 2007 in napovedi za leto 2008" ( KOM(2008)0035 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document entitled ‘Reducing administrative burdens in the European Union – 2007 progress report and 2008 outlook’ ( COM(2008)0035 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0355/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0355/2008 ),
A. ker mora biti zakonodajno okolje v Evropski uniji zasnovano na merilih jasnosti in učinkovitosti,
A. whereas the European Union’s regulatory environment should be informed by criteria of clarity and effectiveness,
B. ker izboljšanje regulativnih postopkov lahko pomaga pri doseganju ciljev Evropske unije,
B. whereas improving regulatory procedures could help to achieve the objectives of the Union,
C. ker sta načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti temeljni načeli primarne zakonodaje, ki ju je v primeru, da zakonodaja ni v izključni pristojnosti Skupnosti, treba brezpogojno upoštevati,
C. whereas the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality are key principles of primary law and, in areas where the Community does not have sole legislative power, must be respected at all costs,
D. ker je pravilna uporaba načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti temeljnega pomena za utrditev teže in učinkovitosti zakonodaje Skupnosti, kakor tudi za približanje odločitev državljanom in s tem za boljše sprejemanje Unije s strani prebivalstva, in ker sta ti načeli nujno potrebni za uresničitev utemeljenosti in namena ukrepov Skupnosti, saj omogočata državam članicam izvajanje lastnih zakonodajnih pristojnosti, v duhu sodelovanja med različnimi ravnmi upravljanja, ter posledično krepita pravno varnost,
D. whereas the correct application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality makes a fundamental contribution to consolidating the authority and effectiveness of Community legislation and to ensuring that decisions are taken at a level closer to citizens, thereby ultimately securing greater public acceptance of the Union, and whereas these principles are essential to legitimising the appropriateness and scope of Community action, in so far as they enable the Member States to exercise their own legislative powers in a spirit of collaboration between the various levels of government, thereby increasing legal security,
E. ker je sprejemanje zakonodaje Skupnosti sedaj odvisno od uporabe načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki zahtevata uvedbo postopkov usklajevanja med nacionalnimi zakonodajnimi, izvršnimi in sodnimi organi, za zagotovitev nujnosti in zakonitosti ukrepov Evropske unije,
E. whereas at present Community law-making is subject to the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, which require the establishment of procedures for coordination with the national legislative, executive and judicial authorities in order to guarantee that European Union action is both necessary and lawful,
F. ker Komisija poudarja vrsto pomembnih vidikov za izboljšanje zakonodaje Evropske unije, kot so ocena učinka, zmanjšanje upravnih stroškov in poenostavitev, izboljšanje ter posodobitev veljavnih predpisov,
F. whereas the Commission highlights a range of significant factors involved in improving Union regulation, such as impact assessment, reducing administrative costs and simplifying, improving and updating existing regulations,
G. ker Komisija v zvezi s tem pripisuje velik pomen vzpostavitvi odprtega dialoga med socialnimi partnerji in nacionalnimi zakonodajalci,
G. whereas the Commission attaches importance in this respect to establishing an open dialogue with both sides of industry and with national legislators,
H. ker je Komisija v svojem dokumentu "Prvo poročilo o napredku glede strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2006)0690 ) napovedala približno 50 pobud za kodifikacijo za leto 2006, vendar jih je bilo le 36 posredovanih Evropskemu parlamentu, in ker je, po drugi strani, napovedala 200 pobud za kodifikacijo za leto 2007, vendar jih je bilo zakonodajalcu posredovanih le 21,
H. whereas in its ‘First progress report on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’ ( COM(2006)0690 ), the Commission announced approximately 50 codification initiatives for 2006, but only 36 were in fact forwarded to Parliament, and, while 200 codification initiatives were announced for 2007, only 21 were submitted to the legislator,
I. ker v svojem tekočem programu poenostavitve priloženemu omenjenemu drugemu poročilu o napredku glede strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja Komisija meni, da sta si revizija ter prenova veljavnih predpisov na nekaterih področjih enakovredna (energetska učinkovitost stavb, civilno letalstvo, itd.),
I. whereas, in its Simplification Rolling Programme annexed to its above-mentioned ‘Second progress report on the strategy for simplifying the regulatory environment’, the Commission treats the revision and the recasting of regulations current in various areas (energy efficiency of buildings, civil aviation, etc.) as being equivalent,
J. ker se je Komisija zavezala, da bo predstavila akcijski program, ki bi upravne obremenitve podjetij v Evropski uniji zmanjšal za 25 % do leta 2012, in ker je v ta namen predlagala vrsto takojšnjih ukrepov, ki zajemajo več zakonodajnih področij,
J. whereas the Commission has undertaken to submit an action programme intended to reduce the administrative burdens on companies in the EU by 25% by 2012 and whereas, to that end, has put forward a series of fast-track actions related to various legislative sectors,
3. poudarja pomen načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti pri prizadevanjih za boljšo pripravo zakonodaje, da bi tako odpravili nepotrebno upravno breme za države članice in druge vpletene, kot tudi zagotovili širše razumevanje ukrepov, ki se jih v skladu z obema načeloma ureja samo na ravni Skupnosti, pri državljanih EU;
Emphasises, in the context of the efforts to bring about better lawmaking, the importance of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality both in reducing unnecessary bureaucratic burdens on Member States and those affected by legislation and in securing broader acceptance among EU citizens for those measures which, in keeping with both principles, can only be taken at Community level;
7. meni, da objektivne presoje vpliva predstavljajo pomembno orodje za ocenjevanju predlogov Komisije, zaradi česar se zavzema za zunanjo in neodvisno preverjanje izvajanja ocen učinka;
Believes that objective impact assessments are an important tool for assessing Commission proposals and calls, therefore, for external, independent scrutiny of the conduct of impact assessments;
10. meni, da bi morala Parlament in Svet pri pripravi predlogov sprememb upoštevati oceno učinka Komisije in lastne ocene učinka, da bi se izboljšala kakovost priprave zakonodaje;
Is of the opinion that, when proposing their amendments, Parliament and the Council should take into account both the Commission's and their own impact assessments in order to improve the quality of the drafting of legislation;
11. nadalje meni, da morajo objektivne ocene učinka temeljiti tudi na pravočasnem in celovitem posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi stranmi; poziva Komisijo, da v svoje ocene učinka vključi zadostno število scenarijev in možnosti strategij (med njimi možnost, da se ne stori ničesar, če je to potrebno) kot podlago za stroškovno učinkovite in trajnostne rešitve;
11 Takes the view, further, that objective impact assessments must be partly based on early and broad consultation of interested parties; calls on the Commission to incorporate in its impact assessments a comprehensive range of scenarios and policy options (including, where necessary, the ‘do nothing’ option) as the basis for cost-effective and sustainable solutions;
15. poudarja, da bi morali nezakonodajni ukrepi spoštovati ravnotežje moči in vloge posameznih institucij; želi, da Parlament preudarno in usklajeno prispeva k takim ukrepom ter da gradi na preteklih izkušnjah; poudarja potrebo po politični potrditvi takih inovativnih ukrepov;
Underlines that non-legislative measures should respect the balance of power and the respective roles of the institutions; wants the Parliament to make a wise and coherent contribution to such measures, building on experience; stresses the need for political endorsement of such innovative measures;
20. ponavlja željo, da bi Komisija sprejela postopek prenovitve kot reden zakonodajni postopek, tudi če se predlaga pregled veljavnih tekstov, kar bi omogočilo celoten pregled besedila za vsak predlog, vključno s specifičnimi spremembami, z jasno navedbo novih in nespremenjenih delov;
Confirms its wish that the Commission adopt recasting as an ordinary legislative technique, even when the ‘revision’ of the current text is being proposed, so as to make it possible to have – for each initiative – a complete overview of the text, including the specific amendments, clearly indicating which parts are new and which parts remain unchanged;
UL L 321, 31.12.2003, str.
OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
1. skupaj s Svetom in Komisijo lahko ustanovile specifične strukture, ki bi spremljale sodelovanje interesnih skupin za spodbujanje poenostavitve;
1. , specific structures could be established in conjunction with the Council and the Commission, making provision for the adequate involvement of the interested parties, in order to encourage simplification;
26. pozdravlja odločitev Komisije, da bo pregledala pravni red Skupnosti na področju prava družb, računovodstva in revidiranja, in v zvezi s tem čim prej pričakuje konkretne predloge;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has announced a review of the Community acquis on company, accounting and auditing law, and trusts that specific proposals in this regard will be forthcoming as soon as possible;
28. poudarja, da je treba še naprej prizadevati za poenostavitev odnosov med Komisijo in državljani, na primer na področjih javnih naročil, finančnih storitev, raziskovalnih programov, predpisov o državni pomoči in prošenj za finančna sredstva Skupnosti;
Underlines that further efforts to achieve simplification are also required in the Commission's interaction with citizens, e.g. in the areas of procurement, financial services, research programmes, State aid rules and applications for Community funding.