natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato poročevalec za letalski sektor predlaga znižanje zgolj za 1,5 odstotka letno.
That is why the rapporteur proposes only a reduction of 1.5 percent each year for the aviation sector.
To bi po njegovem mnenju zahtevalo večjo ambicioznost pri zakonodaji o porazdelitvi prizadevanj.
This would, according to the rapporteur's opinion, involve an increased level of ambition in the legislation on effort sharing.
Svet je podprl, da bi 90 % pravic podelili prosto, na dražbi pa naj bi jih bilo samo 10 %.
Only 10% should be auctioned.
Določba o pregledu za obdobje po letu 2012 je zelo popustljiva.
The review clause for post-2012 is very soft.
Po besedilu iz prve parlamentarne obravnave bi moralo letalstvo začeti z dražbo 25 %, delež na dražbi pa naj bi se zviševal do najvišje ravni, ki je obvezna za druge udeležence v sistemu za trgovanje z emisijami.
According to the Parliament's first reading aviation should start with 25% auctioning and go up to the maximum level of auctioning that is obliged to other participants in the ETS.
Datum začetka veljavnosti
Starting date
Svet in Parlament sta v nasprotju s Komisijo soglašala, da morajo biti medcelinski leti v sistemu zajeti že od začetka.
Council and Parliament agree that, contrary to the Commission proposal, intercontinental flights should be included from the beginning.
Najnovejše znanstvene raziskave poudarjajo nujnost tega problema, tako da ne bi smeli odlašati.
Latest scientific reports underline the urgency of the problem so that any delay should be avoided.
Zato je poročevalec ponovno uporabil predlog spremembe iz prve obravnave.
That is why the rapporteur reintroduces the first reading amendment.
Parlament je glasoval, naj se za dušikove okside uporablja količnik, dokler ne bo sprejeta posebna zakonodaja o njih.
The Parliament voted in favour of a multiplier on NO X which should be in place until a specific legislation on NO X is adopted.
Za zdaj Komisija še nima niti osnutka o tovrstni posebni zakonodaji.
At the moment there is not even a draft of the Commission proposal on the specific legislation available.
Zato bi morali uveljaviti količnik, kakor je Parlament predlagal v prvi obravnavi.
That is why the multiplier should be established according to the Parliament's first reading.
Pomembno je tudi spremljati učinke cirusov in to vprašanje obravnavati takoj, ko bo na voljo dovolj znanstvenih podatkov.
It is also important to monitor the effects of cirrus clouds and address the question as soon as enough scientific evidence is available.
Minimalni standardi učinkovitosti in dostop
Minimum efficiency standards and gateway
Za Parlament je zelo pomembno, da ne pride do tega, da bi letalske družbe zgolj kupovale dovoljenja iz drugih sektorjev, ne da bi se izboljšali učinkovitost in okoljska uspešnost tega sektorja.
For the Parliament it is very important to avoid a situation where airlines just buy permits from other sectors without improving efficiency and environmental performance of the sector itself.
Zato sta bila sprejeta dva predloga sprememb o določbi o učinkovitosti in omejitvah pri kupovanju dovoljenj iz drugih sektorjev.
That is why two amendments on efficiency clause and limits on the purchase of allowances from other sectors were adopted.
Svet te točke ni upošteval, čeprav je najbrž zelo pomembna za verodostojnost okoljske politike Evropske unije.
The Council did not consider this point, but it seems to be very important for the credibility of the environmental policy of the European Union.
Mehanizem za čist razvoj in skupno izvajanje
CDM and JI
Svet je kot zgornjo mejo za mehanizem za čist razvoj opredelil na 15 %.
The limit for CDM has been fixed at 15% by the Council.
Stališče Parlamenta je, da bi morala biti ta meja povprečje drugih udeležencev v sistemu.
The Parliament's position was that it should be the average of other participants in the scheme.
Obe instituciji sta soglašali, da bi jo bilo treba v obdobju po letu 2013 prilagoditi splošnemu pregledu.
For post-2013 both institutions agree that it should be adapted to the general review.
Vzletna teža
Take-off weight
Parlament je glasoval za predlog spremembe, po katerem bi za manjše zrakoplove (lažje od 20.000 kilogramov) veljal drugačen (izravnalni) sistem.
The Parliament voted for an amendment that would oblige a different scheme (offset scheme) to small aircraft (lower than 20 000 kilos).
Namen tega predloga spremembe je, da bi sistem lažje deloval za majhna in srednje velika podjetja.
This is mainly to make the system easier to administer for SMEs.
Svet ga ni sprejel, temveč je uvedel drugo odstopanje, tako imenovano določbo de minimis , ki pravzaprav določa, da družbe z manj kot enim letom, ki vključuje letališče v EU, dnevno, ne bi bile zajete v tem sistemu.
The Council did not accept this amendment but introduced another derogation, the so-called de minimis clause which is more or less saying that companies that have less than one flight in and out of an EU airport per day should not be covered by the scheme.
V vsakem primeru pa odstopanje deloma zajema iste izvajalce.
Anyhow both derogations partly concern the same operators.
Poročevalec predlaga, da bi določbo de minimis , ki jo je predlagal Svet, prilagodili, tako da ne bi temeljila na številu letov, pač pa na emisijah ogljikovega dioksida, saj dejansko šteje okoljski učinek.
The rapporteur proposes to adapt the de minimis clause proposed by the Council and to base it not on flight numbers but on CO 2 emissions because it is the environmental effect that counts.
Najbolj oddaljene regije
Ultraperipheral regions
Parlament je sprejel dva predloga sprememb za izpolnitev potreb zelo oddaljenih regij.
The Parliament adopted two amendments to address the needs of ultraperipheral regions.
Del prihodkov od dražbe bi morali uporabiti za reševanje možnih težav v najbolj oddaljenih regijah, njihov posebni položaj pa bi morali pri podeljevanju dovoljenj upoštevati.
Part of the revenues generated by auctioning should be used to address any possible problems in the outermost regions and the allocation of certificates should take their special situation into account.
Svet je ta dva predloga zavrnil, namesto njiju pa uvedel odstopanje za nekatere lete med zelo oddaljenimi regijami.
The Council rejected these two proposals but instead introduced a derogation for some flights between ultraperipheral regions.
Preveriti je treba, ali bi ta predlog lahko povzročil težave v mednarodni razpravi.
It needs to be examined if this proposal could cause any problems in the international debate.
Poročevalec bi raje ostal pri stališču Parlamenta iz prve obravnave, kar pomeni, da se ne uvajajo odstopanja, pač pa da se pri razdeljevanju prihodkov in podeljevanju dovoljenj zadovoljujejo potrebe najbolj oddaljenih regij.
The rapporteur prefers to stick to the Parliament's position in first reading which would mean: no derogation but addressing the needs of outermost regions in the distribution of revenues and the allocation of allowances.
Rezerva za rast in nove udeležence
Reserve for growth and new entrants
Parlament je pozval k rezervi za nove udeležence in rezervi za hitro rastoče letalske prevoznike.
The Parliament asked for a new entrants reserve and a reserve for fast growing airlines.
Svet je zamisel o tem sprejel, vendar jo je občutno spremenil.
The idea has been accepted by the Council but has been substantially modified.
Poročevalec meni, da je v tem primeru skupno stališče sprejemljivo.
The rapporteur thinks that in this case the Common Position is acceptable.
Prihodki od dražbe pravic
Revenues generated by auctioning
Ena najpomembnejših razlik med Svetom in Parlamentom je verjetno pri vprašanju, kaj storiti s prihodki od dražbe.
Maybe the most important difference between Council and Parliament is the question of how the revenues generated by auctioning should be dealt with.
Svet predloga spremembe Parlamenta ni upošteval in izrecno poudaril, da namenskost nikakor ne bo podprta.
The Council ignored the amendment of the Parliament and explicitly stressed that no kind of earmarking will be accepted.
Poročevalec se popolnoma zaveda politične razsežnosti tega vprašanja za finančne ministre.
The rapporteur is fully aware of the political dimension of this question for the Finance Ministers.
Po drugi strani pa je stališče Parlamenta iz pravnih in političnih razlogov dodobra utemeljeno.
On the other hand the Parliament's position is more than justified for legal and political reasons.
Poročevalec je ta predlog spremembe iz prve parlamentarne obravnave ponovno vložil s spodnjimi argumenti.
Especially the following arguments motivate the rapporteur to retable Parliament's first reading amendment:
Če bo rezultat tega sistema zgolj večji prihodek za finančna ministrstva, ne bo pa koristi za državljane, ki ravnajo "okolju prijazno", na primer uporabljajo avtobuse in vlake namesto letal, bo to politiko težje utemeljiti.
If the result of the scheme is only an increase of the income for the Finance Ministers and those citizens that behave environmental-friendly, e.g. by using the bus or train instead of the plane, have no benefit, it is more difficult to justify the policy.
Davčne olajšave za okolju prijazne oblike prevoza bi bile poglavitnega pomena pri prepričevanju državljanov, da ne pobiramo zgolj denarja, pač pa podpiramo dejavnosti za okolje.
Tax cuts on environmental-friendly transport modes would be crucial to convince citizens that we are not collecting money but supporting environmental activities.
Ne bi smelo priti do tega, da bi bilo videti, kakor da je sistem namenjen zgolj nabiranju denarja za finančna ministrstva.
The impression that the scheme mainly collects money for the Finance Ministers and does not address the real problem needs to be avoided.
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o odobritvi Protokola o strateški presoji vplivov na okolje h Konvenciji UN/ECE iz Espooja iz leta 1991 o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje v imenu Evropske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council decision on the approval on behalf of the European Community of the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2008)0132 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2008)0132 ),
– ob upoštevanju Protokola o strateški presoji vplivov na okolje h Konvenciji UN/ECE iz Espooja iz leta 1991 o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje,
– having regard to the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context,
– ob upoštevanju člena 175(1) in prvega stavka prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 175(1) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerega se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0161/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0161/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0221/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0221/2008 ),
Na peti ministrski konferenci z naslovom „Okolje za Evropo“, ki je potekala v Kijevu v Ukrajini maja 2003, je bil sprejet Protokol o strateški presoji vplivov na okolje h Konvenciji UN/ECE iz Espooja iz leta 1991 o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje („Protokol SEA“).
The fifth Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe held" in Kiev, Ukraine in May 2003 adopted the Protocol on Strategic Environmental assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in Transboundary Context (SEA Protocol).
Komisija je v imenu Evropske skupnosti podpisala protokol SEA 21. maja 2003.
The Commission on behalf of the European Community signed the SEA Protocol on 21 May 2003.
S Konvencijo UN/ECE iz leta 1991 o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje ( konvencijo iz Espooja ), ki temelji na obstoječem pravu s področja presoje vplivov na okolje, so bili določeni postopki za posvetovanje s pogodbenicami, v katerih bo verjetno prišlo do čezmejnih vplivov predlaganih projektov na okolje.
The 1991 UN/ECE Convention on transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment (the Espoo Convention), building on existing EIA law, established procedures for consulting Parties likely to be affected by transboundary environmental impacts of proposed projects.
Konvencija je začela veljati leta 1997.
The Convention entered into force in 1997.
Evropska skupnost jo je podpisala 26. februarja 1991, ratificirala pa 24. junija 1997.
The European Community signed it on 26 February 1991 and ratified in on 24 June 1997.
Njene glavne določbe se izvajajo z direktivo 97/11.
Its main provisions are implemented by Directive 97/11.
Direktiva 2001/42/ES o presoji vplivov nekaterih načrtov in programov na okolje (direktiva o strateški presoji vplivov na okolje) velja za vrsto načrtov in programov, v njej pa so določene tudi podrobne obveznosti glede presoje njihovih vplivov na okolje in poročanja v zvezi s tem.
Directive 2001/42/EC, on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive), applies to a broad category of plans and programmes, and sets out detailed requirements for assessing and reporting on their environmental effects.
To je postopek strateške presoje vplivov na okolje.
This is the SEA- process.
Direktiva o strateški presoji vplivov na okolje vključuje določbo o čezmejnih vplivih, ki temelji na konvenciji iz Espooja.
The SEA - Directive includes a provision on transboundary effects inspired by the Espoo Convention.
Cilji protokola o strateški presoji vplivov na okolje naj bi jamčili visoko stopnjo varovanja okolja in zdravja ter zagotovili, da sta ta vidika upoštevana pri ukrepih in instrumentih, namenjenih zagotavljanju trajnostnega razvoja.
The SEA - Protocol's objectives are to provide for a high level of protection of the environment, including health, and to ensure that these concerns are integrated into measures and instruments designed to ensure sustainable development.
Evropska skupnost namerava v skladu s strategijo za trajnostni razvoj in boljšo zakonsko ureditev izvajati člen 13 protokola o strateški presoji vplivov na okolje h konvenciji iz Espooja s postopki za presojo vplivov, določenimi v sporočilih o presoji vplivov, v katerih so uravnoteženo obravnavani gospodarski, družbeni in okoljski vidiki trajnostnega razvoja.
The European Community, in conformity with its Strategy on Sustainable Development and Better Regulation, intends to implement Article 13 of the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Espoo Convention through the impact assessment procedures set out in the Communications on Impact Assessment, which address in a balanced manner the economic, social and environmental components of sustainable development.
Pozornost si zasluži več vidikov z razsežnostjo EU.
Several aspects of the EU dimension deserve consideration.
ES in države članice so ene izmed prvih, ki so izoblikovale idejo in prakso strateške presoje vplivov na okolje, in bi morale svojo podporo potrditi z ratifikacijo protokola o strateški presoji vplivov na okolje h konvenciji iz Espooja o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje.
The EC and the Member States have been among the leaders in developing the concept and practice of the SEA and they should confirm their support by ratifying the Protocol on Strategic Assessment to the Espoo Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context.
Protokol o strateški okoljski presoji k leta 1991 sprejeti Konvenciji UNECE iz Espooja o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje
Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context
o zaščiti posebnih pravic Evropskega parlamenta pred nacionalnimi sodišči
on the defence of the prerogatives of the European Parliament before the national courts
Jo Leinen , Odbor za ustavne zadeve
Jo Leinen , Committee on Constitutional Affairs
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – člen 47 Poslovnika
(*)Associated committee – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve ..........................................................................8
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (*) ............................8
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0222/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0222/2008 ),
A. ker Evropski parlament ni pravna oseba; ker ga pri zaščiti njegovih posebnih pravic pred nacionalnimi sodišči pogosto ovirajo težave, značilne za njegovo posebno naravo,
A. whereas the European Parliament has no legal personality; whereas, as a result, it is often impeded in protecting its prerogatives before national courts from problems that are peculiar to its special nature,
B. ker Parlament spoštuje pravico Komisije do pobude, vendar vztraja tudi pri svoji pravici iz člena 192 Pogodbe ES, da Komisijo pozove, naj predloži zakonodajni predlog,
B. whereas Parliament respects the right of initiative of the Commission but upholds its own right under Article 192 of the EC Treaty to request the Commission to submit legislative proposals,
B. ker ima Evropski parlament s tem v zvezi na voljo vrsto pravnih sredstev, predvidenih s Pogodbo, ki mu zagotavljajo zaščito omenjenih posebnih pravic pred drugimi institucijami Skupnosti, na primer tožbo zaradi opustitve ukrepanja (člen 232 Pogodbe ES) in tožbo za razveljavitev aktov Skupnosti (člen 230 Pogodbe ES),
C. whereas in this regard the European Parliament has at its disposal a range of remedies under the Treaty which ensure that the aforementioned prerogatives are protected vis-à-vis the other Community institutions, such as actions for failure to act (Article 232 of the EC Treaty) and actions for the annulment of Community acts (Article 230 of the EC Treaty),
F. ker Evropski parlament tudi ne more kot zadnje sredstvo začeti postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev (člen 226 Pogodbe ES) proti državi članici, saj je za to pristojna le Komisija,
F. whereas the European Parliament cannot even initiate, as a last resort, infringement proceedings (under Article 226 of the EC Treaty) against a Member State, since only the Commission has the power to do so,
G. ker pomanjkanje ustreznih instrumentov za učinkovito obrambo lastnih odločitev lahko ovira učinkovitost Evropskega parlamenta kot političnega in zakonodajnega organa,
G. whereas the lack of appropriate instruments with which to defend its own decisions effectively can hamper the effectiveness of the European Parliament as a political and legislative body,
H. ker načela lojalnega sodelovanja med institucijami Evropske unije in dobrega upravljanja zahtevajo, da je dejavnost organov Skupnosti urejena s pravili preglednosti in razumljivosti, ki omogočajo, da se razlogi za sprejetje ali nesprejetje določenih ukrepov pojasnijo,
H. whereas the principles of loyal cooperation between the institutions of the European Union and those of good administration call for the activity of Community bodies to be governed by rules of transparency and intelligibility in order to clarify the reasons for which a given action was or was not taken,
I. ker bi bilo treba zaradi premagovanja omenjenih težav okrepiti ukrepe za zaščito posebnih pravic Evropskega parlamenta in sicer ne s spreminjanjem Pogodbe ES, ampak s prizadevanji, da bi na podlagi izkušenj nacionalnih parlamentov oblikovali pravna sredstva, ki bi bila primerna za posebne potrebe Evropskega parlamenta,
I. whereas, in order to obviate the above-mentioned problems, it would be advisable to strengthen the measures to protect parliamentary prerogatives not by amending the EC Treaty but by attempting to extrapolate from the experience of the national parliaments remedies that are appropriate to the specific requirements of the European Parliament,
J. ker rezultati v ta namen izvedene študije na obsežnem vzorcu držav članic jasno kažejo, da večina nacionalnih pravnih ureditev zagotavlja svojim nacionalnim poslancem pravna sredstva, katerih namen ni le zagotoviti zaščito interesov parlamenta kot celote, ampak tudi njegovih posameznih članov,
J. whereas the results of the study carried out to that end on a broad cross-section of Member States clearly show that most national legal orders grant their national parliaments legal remedies aimed at ensuring not only the defence of the interests of the parliament as a whole but also of each individual member,
K. ker morajo države članice spoštovati načelo odkritega in lojalnega sodelovanja iz člena 10 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in ker so glede na sodno prakso Sodišča same države članice dolžne predvideti sistem pravnih sredstev in postopkov, ki zagotavlja spoštovanje pravice do učinkovitega sodnega varstva
K. whereas the Member States are subject to the principle of sincere and loyal cooperation enshrined in Article 10 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, and whereas, in the light of the case-law of the Court of Justice, those same Member States are required to ‘establish a system of legal remedies and procedures which ensure respect for the right to effective judicial protection’
Zadeva C-50/00P Unión de pequeńos agricultores, proti Svetu, [2002] ECR I-6677. ,
Case C-50/00P Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council ECR [2002] I-6677. ,
1. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva zahteve Evropskega parlamenta za sprožitev postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državi, ki je obtožena kršitve posebnih pravic Evropskega parlamenta, ter zahteva, da ga v primeru, če kolegij komisarjev odloči, da ne bo ukrepal, kot se zahteva, pristojni komisar pisno in podrobno obvesti o razlogih;
Calls on the Commission to take account of requests by the European Parliament to bring infringement proceedings against any State for breach of parliamentary prerogatives, and asks that it be given a comprehensive statement of reasons by the competent Commissioner should the College of Commissioners decide not to take the action requested;
4. zahteva, naj pristojni odbor pripravi predlog spremembe k členu 121 Poslovnika, da bi zajemal vse pravne postopke pred vsemi sodišči in da bi določal poenostavljen postopek za uporabo v primerih, ko se pred Sodiščem po hitrem ali nujnem postopku vložijo pravna sredstva;
Asks the committee responsible to prepare an amendment to Rule 121 of the Rules of Procedure so as to cover all legal proceedings before any court and to provide for a simplified procedure for use where proceedings are brought before the Court of Justice under an expedited or urgent procedure;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga ustrezne zakonodajne ukrepe za zagotavljanje popolne učinkovitosti pravne zaščite posebnih pravic Evropskega parlamenta;
Calls on the Commission to propose the appropriate legislative measures in order to ensure the full effectiveness of the legal defence by Parliament of its prerogatives;
Evropski parlament se je pogosto znašel (in se še znajde) v položaju, ko ni mogel učinkovito zaščititi posebnih pravic, ki mu jih priznavajo pogodbe in Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice.
The European Parliament has often found it – and still finds it – impossible to effectively protect the prerogatives which the Treaties and the European Court of Human Rights itself expressly grant it.
Zato obstaja nevarnost, da bodo pravice in pristojnosti na ravni Skupnosti ostale mrtva črka na papirju, in da ne bodo učinkovito zaščitene.
There is therefore the risk that rights and powers that are enshrined at Community and European level remain on paper, without being effectively safeguarded.