natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za nadaljnjo analizo je treba omeniti poglavje v predlogu Komisije, ki govori o pravni podlagi.
Further analysis will be facilitated by reference at this point to the 'Legal Basis' section included in the Commission's proposal.
Komisija je pri izbiri člena 95 Pogodbe o ES (člen 114 Pogodbe o delovanju EU) za pravno podlago zapisala:
In selecting Article 95 EC (114 TFEU) as legal basis the Commission stated:
DEO zagotavlja dokončno oblikovanje dobro delujočega notranjega trga z enakimi konkurenčnimi pogoji in brez tehničnih ovir za trgovino ter s prostim pretokom izdelkov, ki spadajo v njeno področje uporabe, ki izpolnjuje zahteve glede označevanja, določene v izvedbenih ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s to direktivo.
The ELD ensures the completion of a well-functioning internal market with a level playing field excluding technical barriers to trade[and] the free movement of products falling within its scope that satisfy the labelling requirements laid down in the implementing measures adopted under the Directive
Uporabo člena 95 Pogodbe o ES kot ustrezne pravne podlage je utemeljila izključno s sklicevanjem na notranji trg.
The Commission couch their justification of Article 95 EC as the appropriate legal basis in terms exclusively referential of the internal market.
To je omembe vredno glede na to, da velik del obrazložitvenega memoranduma obravnava prihranke energije in posledične okoljske koristi, ki bi jih s predlogom lahko dosegli.
This is noteworthy given that the vast bulk of the explanatory memorandum deals with the energy-savings and consequential environmental benefits achievable by way of the proposal.
Uvodna izjava 3 predloga je ponazorovalna do te mere, da jo je treba navesti v celoti:
Recital 3 of the proposal itself is illustrative to the extent that it is probably worth quoting it in full :
V uvodni izjavi 8 piše, da bi bilo treba v izvedbeno zakonodajo vključiti samo izdelke, ki znatno vplivajo na porabo energije ali drugih virov, v uvodni izjavi 12 pa je navedeno, da se energetska učinkovitost ne sme spodbujati do te mere, da bi imela na splošno škodljive posledice za okolje.
Recital 8 states that only energy-related products which have a significant impact on the consumption of energy or the consumption of resources should be subject to implementing legislation, while Recital 12 specifies that energy-efficiency should not be promoted to an extent that produces detrimental environmental consequences overall.
V nobeni uvodni izjavi niso obravnavane morebitne koristi energetske učinkovitosti za notranji trg.
None of the proposal's recitals expressly deal with its potential benefits for the internal market.
Za namene te dejavnosti je pomembno, da se uvodna izjava 8 večinoma izvaja na podlagi člena 1 (z naslovom Področje uporabe) predlagane direktive, ki njeno uporabo omejuje na: „izdelke, ki vplivajo na rabo energije in med uporabo znatno vplivajo na porabo energije, in kjer je to ustrezno, na druge bistvene vire“ .
It is significant, for the purposes of the present exercise, that Recital 8 is substantially implemented by Article 1 of the proposed Directive (entitled 'Scope') which limits its ambit to: "energy-related products which have a significant impact on the consumption of energy and, where relevant, on other essential resources during use" .
Cilj, ki izhaja iz navedenih določb, skupaj s političnim okvirom, v katerem je bila izvedena ocena učinka direktive o energijskem označevanju, in splošno vsebino obrazložitvenega memoranduma k predlogu, jasno kaže, da je člen 194 izmed razpoložljivih možnosti zdaleč najustreznejša pravna podlaga.
The purpose evidenced by the foregoing provisions, in conjunction with the policy backdrop against which impact assessment was carried out on the ELD and the general tenor of the explanatory memorandum attending the proposal, make it clear that Article 194 is by far the more appropriate legal basis as between the available alternatives.
Vsakršna dodatna povezanost z notranjim trgom, ki jo predlog zagotavlja, je koristna glede na njegov osnovni cilj, in sicer spodbujanje energetske učinkovitosti ter gospodarske in okoljske koristi, ki so s tem povezane.
Any additional coherence granted the internal market by way of the proposal is a benefit incidental to its primary aim, namely the promotion of energy-efficiency and its attendant economic and environmental gains.
Da ima lahko predlog vse navedene učinke, je popolnoma v skladu z zgornjo analizo razmerja med členoma 114 in 194 Pogodbe o delovanju EU.
That all of these effects can result from the proposal is entirely in line with the analysis of the relationship between Articles 114 and 194 TFEU provided above.
Odločujoč dejavnik v tej analizi je, da se cilj predloga neposredno sklada s ciljem iz člena 194.
The determinative factor in our present inquiry is the direct manner in which the purpose of the proposal matches that of Article 194.
Za ta posebni ukrep se zato lahko šteje, da je zlasti namenjen spodbujanju energetske učinkovitosti in varčevanju z energijo v skladu s členom 194(1)(c) Pogodbe o delovanju EU.
Consequently, this particular measure can be regarded as being primarily directed towards promoting energy efficiency and saving within the meaning of Article 194(1)(c) TFEU.
Če bi imel predlog, čeprav zadeva energetsko politiko, za glavni cilj vzpostavitev in delovanje notranjega trga, bi moral temeljiti na členu 114.
If the proposal, albeit concerned with energy policy, had had as its principal objective the establishment and functioning of the internal market, it would have had to have been based on Article 114.
Obstoj nove pravne podlage, specifične za energijo, še ne pomeni, da morajo vsi ukrepi, ki so povezani z energijo, temeljiti na tem členu.
The fact that a new specific legal basis for energy now exists does not mean that all measures concerned with energy must be based on that article.
Sodišče je menilo, da bi se morala tam, kjer je bila za posamezen sektor sprejeta posebna pravna ureditev, ta uporabljati pred ostalimi in splošnimi določbami
The Court has held that where a sector-specific legal regime has been adopted, it should be used in preference to residual and general provisions
Glej opombo 8. ter da mora ukrep načeloma temeljiti na eni sami pravni podlagi
See footnote 8 and that in principle a measure is to be founded on only one legal basis
Zadeva C-91/05 Komisija proti Svetu , Zbirka odločb 2008 I-3651. .
Case C-91/05 Commission v. Council [2008]ECR I-3651. .
Glede na ta načela in zgornjo analizo menimo, da je člen 194 Pogodbe o delovanju EU za ta predlog ustrezna pravna podlaga.
In light of these principles and of the foregoing analysis, it is considered that Article 194 TFEU is the appropriate legal basis for this proposal.
o prispevku kohezijske politike k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in ciljev strategije EU 2020
on the contribution of the Cohesion policy to the achievement of Lisbon and the EU2020 objectives
Poročevalec: Ricardo Cortés Lastra
Rapporteur: Ricardo Cortés Lastra
o prispevku kohezijske politike k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in ciljev strategije EU 2020
on the contribution of the cohesion policy to the achievement of Lisbon and the EU 2020 objectives
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti členov od 174 do 178 te pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 174 to178 thereof,
UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.25. ,
UL L 291, 21.10.2006, str.
OJ L 291, 21.10.2006, p.11.
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0165 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2009)0165 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. avgusta 2007 z naslovom „Z raziskavami in inovacijami do konkurenčnih evropskih regij – prispevek k večji rasti ter k povečanju števila in kakovosti delovnih mest“ ( KOM(2007)0474 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication of 16 August 2007 on 'Competitive European Regions through research and innovation - A contribution to more growth and more and better jobs' ( COM(2007)0474 )
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 14. novembra 2007 o inovacijah, ki jih regije izvajajo v okviru kohezijske politike ( SEC(2007)1547 ),
– having regard to the Commission Staff Working document of 14 November 2007 on 'Regions delivering innovation through the cohesion policy' ( SEC(2007)1547 )
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Skupna prizadevanja za gospodarsko rast in nova delovna mesta – Nov začetek za Lizbonsko strategijo“ ( KOM(2005)0024 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication 'Working together for growth and jobs A new start for the Lisbon Strategy' ( COM(2005)0024 )
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z naslovom „Ocena lizbonske strategije“ ( SEC(2010)0114 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document 'Lisbon Strategy evaluation document' ( SEC(2010)0114 )
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. decembra 2007 o lizbonski strategiji za rast in delovna mesta, ki jo države članice in regije izvajajo v okviru kohezijske politike EU v obdobju 2007–2013 ( KOM(2007)0798 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication of 11 December 2007 on 'Member States and Regions delivering the Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs through EU cohesion policy, 2007-2013' ( COM(2007)0798 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 14. maja 2008 o rezultatih pogajanj glede strategij in programov kohezijske politike za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 ( KOM(2008)0301 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication of 14 May 2008 on 'The results of the negotiations concerning cohesion policy strategies and programmes for the programming period 2007-2013' ( COM(2008)0301 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2009 o 20. letnem poročilu o izvajanju strukturnih skladov (2008) ( KOM(2009)0617 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication of 21 December 2009 on the 20th annual report on implementation of the Structural Funds (2008) ( COM(2009)0617 ),
– ob upoštevanju naknadnih vrednotenj programskega obdobja 2000–2006,
– having regard to the ex post evaluations of the 2000-2006 programming period,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 24. novembra 2009 o posvetovanju o prihodnji strategiji „EU 2020“ ( KOM(2009)0647 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Working Document of 24 November 2009 on consultation on the future EU2020 strategy ( COM(2009)0647 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov neuradnega srečanja Evropskega sveta 11. februarja 2010,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Informal European Council of 11 February 2010,
– ob upoštevanju javnega posvetovanja na pobudo Komisije o EU 2020 ter njegovih rezultatov ( SEC(2010)0116 ),
– having regard to the public consultation launched by the Commission on EU 2020 and its outcome (SEC2010)0116),
– ob upoštevanju strateškega poročila Komisije z dne 31. marca 2010 o spodbujanju razprave na ravni EU o koheziji,
– having regard to the Commission Strategic Report of 31 March 2010 promoting an EU debate on cohesion ;
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7–0129/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7‑0129/2010 ),
A. ker uredbe o strukturnih skladih, ob upoštevanju, da je glavni cilj kohezijske politike zmanjšati vrzel med stopnjami razvoja različnih regij ter zmanjšati zaostajanje regij z najbolj omejenimi možnostmi in otokov, vključno s podeželskimi območji, od leta 2007 vključujejo obvezno namensko porabo za doseganje lizbonskih ciljev v državah EU15, podoben neobvezen mehanizem namenske porabe pa prostovoljno uporabljajo tudi države EU12, pri čemer naj bi sredstva kohezijske politike usmerjali v povečevanje privlačnosti držav članic in regij, rast in nova delovna mesta,
A. whereas, bearing in mind that the ultimate aim of cohesion policy is to reduce the gap between the levels of development of the various regions and the extent to which the least-favoured regions and islands (including rural areas) are lagging behind, since 2007 the Structural Funds regulations include obligatory earmarking to the Lisbon objectives for the EU15 and a similar non-obligatory earmarking mechanism has been voluntarily applied by the EU12, targeting cohesion policy resources at the attractiveness of Member States and regions, growth and jobs,
B. ker je kohezijska politika zlasti v sedanji recesiji med drugim zaradi nespremenljivega obsega sredstev za programe in politike dolgoročnega razvoja, decentraliziranega sistema upravljanja in vključitve prednostnih nalog Skupnosti na področju trajnostnega razvoja med njene temeljne cilje eden glavnih instrumentov za spodbujanje rasti, konkurenčnosti in delovnih mest v EU,
B. whereas - particularly during the current recession - the cohesion policy is one of the main instruments to foster growth, competitiveness and jobs in the EU due, among other things, to its stable amount of funding for long-term development programmes and policies, the decentralised management system applied and the inclusion of Community sustainable development priorities among its fundamental objectives,
C. ker dve tretjini naložb javnega sektorja v EU prihajata z regionalne in lokalne ravni, ker imajo regionalni in lokalni organi oblasti pogosto obsežne pristojnosti na področju politik in odločilno vplivajo na uresničevanje tako sedanje lizbonske strategije kot prihodnje strategije EU2020,
C. whereas two-thirds of public sector investment across the EU comes from the regional and local levels, regional and local authorities often concentrate substantial policy competences and are key actors in delivering both the current Lisbon Strategy and the future EU2020 Strategy,
D. ker bi bilo treba vključiti kohezijsko politiko in strategijo EU2020, saj je kohezijska politika vključena v lizbonsko strategijo zaradi spodbujanja rasti, konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja, ki so glavni cilji strategije,
D. whereas cohesion policy and the EU2020 Strategy should be integrated because cohesion policy is included in the Lisbon Treaty in order to foster growth, competitiveness and employment, which are the key objectives of the Strategy,
E. ker predlagana strategija EU2020 podobno kot lizbonska strategija nezadostno odraža različne stopnje razvoja regij in držav članic in zato daje premajhen poudarek gospodarski koheziji v razširjeni EU,
E. whereas the proposed EU2020 strategy, similar to the Lisbon Strategy, does not sufficiently reflect the different development levels of regions and Member States and therefore does not put enough stress on economic cohesion in the enlarged EU,
Kohezijska politika in lizbonska strategija
Cohesion policy and Lisbon Strategy
4. meni, da izvirna lizbonska strategija, ki temelji le na odprti metodi usklajevanja, strukturno ni mogla izpolniti ciljev, navedenih v njej, resnični rezultati pa so bili doseženi šele, ko je bila povezana s kohezijsko politiko; poudarja, da se je treba pri strategiji EU2020 tej napaki izogniti;
Takes the view that the original Lisbon Strategy, based solely on the open method of coordination, was structurally unable to obtain its stated goals and that it was only when it was linked to the Cohesion policy that true results were reached; stresses that this error should be avoided in the proposed EU2020 strategy;
6. kritično ocenjuje pomanjkanje splošne ocene učinka kohezijskih izdatkov na regionalni razvoj; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni ozemeljski učinek dodelitve strukturnih skladov za lizbonsko strategijo, in oceni, ali sistem dejansko prispeva k uravnoteženemu in usklajenemu regionalnemu razvoju;
Criticises the lack of an overall assessment of the impact of cohesion expenditure on regional development; calls upon the Commission to assess the territorial impact of earmarking Structural Funds to the Lisbon Strategy and to evaluate whether this system is actually contributing to balanced and coherent regional development;
9. meni, da je ena od glavnih omejitev lizbonske strategije šibko upravljanje na več ravneh, ki se kaže v nezadostni vključitvi regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti ter civilne družbe v zasnovo, izvajanje in ocenjevanje strategije ter obveščanje o njej; priporoča, da se ti akterji v prihodnje vključijo v večji meri;
Considers weak multi-level governance one of the main limits of the Lisbon Strategy, with the insufficient involvement of regional and local authorities and civil society in the design, implementation, communication and evaluation of the strategy; recommends their stronger integration in the future at all stages;
11. opozarja, da imajo evropske regije in mesta temeljno vlogo pri izvajanju lizbonske strategije, saj so ključni akterji politik na področju inovacij, raziskav in izobraževanja; poudarja, da izvajajo več kot eno tretjino vseh javnih naložb v EU in porabo strukturnih skladov vedno bolj usmerjajo v cilje, povezane z rastjo in delovnimi mesti;
Notes that Europe's regions and cities play a fundamental part in implementing the Lisbon Strategy, being key players in the field of innovation, research and education policy; points out that they implement more than one third of all public investment in the EU and are increasingly focusing Structural Fund spending on growth- and job-related objectives;
13. obžaluje borne sinergije, ki so bile dosežene med nacionalnimi strateškimi referenčnimi okviri in nacionalnimi programi reform v okviru strategije; priporoča močnejši in reden dialog med upravami, ki so odgovorne za kohezijsko politiko in lizbonsko strategijo/strategijo EU2020, in tematsko ustreznimi partnerji iz nadzornega odbora na vseh ravneh, vključno z ravnjo Skupnosti;
Regrets the weak synergies that existed between National Strategic Reference Frameworks and the National Reform Programmes under the strategy; recommends a stronger and regular dialogue at all levels, including the Community level, between administrations responsible for the cohesion policy and the Lisbon/EU2020 Strategies and the relevant partners from the monitoring committee;
16. obžaluje, da je bila ta strategija predlagana pred koncem revizije veljavne lizbonske strategije; močno priporoča Komisiji, naj pripravi odkrito oceno pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju lizbonske strategije; poudarja, da bi bilo treba priporočila iz tega parlamentarnega poročila vključiti v končno različico nove strategije;
Regrets that this strategy has been proposed before the completion of the review of the current Lisbon Strategy; strongly recommends the Commission to prepare a forthright evaluation of the shortcomings in the Lisbon strategy implementation; stresses that the recommendations of this parliamentary report should be included in the final version of the new strategy;
18. poziva EU, naj sprejme posebne določbe in se ustrezno odzove na potrebe regij, za katere so značilne hude in stalne naravne ali demografske ovire, kot so obalne regije, otoki, gorate, čezmejne in najbolj oddaljene regije, ob upoštevanju pravne podlage za ozemeljsko kohezijo, določene z novo Lizbonsko pogodbo;
Urges the EU to adopt specific provisions and take appropriate action to meet the special needs of regions characterised by natural or demographic handicaps of a serious and permanent nature, such as coastal regions, islands, mountain regions, cross-border and outermost regions, in the light of the legal basis for territorial cohesion that the new Lisbon Treaty provides;
22. je prepričan, da sta izobraževanje in usposabljanje temeljna pogoja za razvoj EU in lahko povečata njeno konkurenčnost glede na globalne izzive; meni, da je treba redno zagotavljati naložbe na tem področju in redno ocenjevati napredek pri dosežkih;
Is convinced that education and training are the fundamental preconditions for the development of the EU and can make it more competitive in the face of global challenges; believes that investment has to be regularly ensured in this domain and that progress on achievements must be regularly assessed;
26. ugotavlja, da zlasti glede širokopasovnega dostopa obstajajo veliki zaostanki na podeželju, ki jih je treba odpraviti v skladu s ciljem iz evropskega programa za digitalne tehnologije, da se podpre trajnostni gospodarski razvoj teh regij;
Notes that, particularly with regard to access to broadband, major deficits exist in rural areas, which must be overcome, in accordance with the objective stated in the Digital Agenda, in order to support the sustainable economic development of these regions;
Njeni glavni cilji – preseganje razlik med regijami in uvedba resnične gospodarske, družbene in ozemeljske kohezije v Evropi – ter načela – celovit pristop, upravljanje na več ravneh in dejansko partnerstvo – so bistveni dopolnilni elementi za uspeh strategije in jih je treba usklajevati z njo;
Its main goals - overcoming the disparities between regions and introducing real economic, social and territorial cohesion in Europe - and principles - an integrated approach, multi-level governance and real partnership - are key complementary elements for the success of the strategy and should be coordinated with it;
32. meni, da mora strategija EU2020 prispevati k uresničevanju ozemeljske kohezije, ki je kot nov cilj vključena v Lizbonsko pogodbo; meni, da lokalne pobude za čezmejno sodelovanje nudijo možnost za ozemeljsko kohezijo, ki do zdaj še ni bila dovolj izkoriščena; poziva Komisijo, naj v svojih predlogih za ureditev prihodnjega teritorialnega sodelovanja podrobneje določi vlogo strategij makroregij;
Considers that the EU2020 strategy must be an integral part in the achievement of the goal of territorial cohesion, included as a new objective in the Lisbon Treaty; believes that local initiatives for cross-border cooperation offer a potential for territorial cohesion which has as yet not been sufficiently exploited; invites the Commission to set out the role of the macro-regions strategies in greater detail in its proposals for the future territorial cooperation arrangements;
34. poudarja, da je za cilje strategije EU2020 pomembno temeljno znanje na lokalni in regionalni ravni; meni, da je zato bistveno zagotoviti skupne statistike in sposobnost branja kazalnikov na lokalni in regionalni ravni;
Stresses the importance of ground-level knowledge, both locally and regionally, for the objectives of the EU2020 Strategy; to this end, considers it essential to ensure the provision of joint statistics, as well as reading capacity in respect of the indicators, at both local and regional level;
36. pričakuje, da bo Komisija pripravila konkretne predloge za oblikovanje sinergij med kohezijsko politiko in obstoječimi sektorskimi politikami skladno s celostnim pristopom; priporoča, da se cilji, instrumenti in upravni postopki v programih racionalizirajo in da se uskladi trajanje programov teh politik;
Expects the Commission to present concrete proposals for creating synergies between the cohesion policy and existing sectoral policies according to an integrated approach; recommends rationalisation of the objectives, instruments and administrative procedures of the programmes and alignment of the programme duration of these policies;
38. priporoča, da se v prihodnjem regulativnem okviru sprejme poenostavljen pristop k uporabi strukturnih skladov; poudarja, da lahko uskladitev pravil in postopkov ter upoštevanje modelov najboljše prakse privede k poenostavitvi sistemov izvajanja in potencialne upravičence spodbudi k sodelovanju v programih, ki jih sofinancira EU;
Recommends the adoption of a simplified approach to the use of the Structural Funds in the future regulatory framework; highlights that the harmonisation of rules and procedures as well as taking into account best practice models, may lead to simplified delivery systems and encourage participation by potential beneficiaries in EU co-funded programmes;
41. meni, da mora Odbor regij prek svoje platforme za spremljanje lizbonske strategije še naprej spremljati napredek v zvezi s prihodnjo strategijo EU2020 in da je treba države članice pozvati, naj na letni ravni strukturirano poročajo o doseženem napredku;
Considers that the Committee of the Regions, through its Lisbon Monitoring Platform, should continue monitoring progress on the ground of the future EU2020 strategy and that Member States should be asked to report yearly, in a structured m anne r, on the progress made;
Ocena trenutnega sistema
Assessing the current system