natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Rok za odziv Parlamenta ostane skrajšan na 1 mesec.
The time-limit for EP reaction remains shortened to 1 month.
Stališče: Rok, opredeljen v členih 5a (3) (c) in (4) (e), bi bilo treba podaljšati na tri mesece, namesto da bi trajal en mesec, kot predlaga Komisija.
Position: The period defined under article 5a (3) (c) and (4) (e) should be extended to three months instead of the one month as proposed by the Commission.
Jozsef Szájer
Mr József Szájer
Predmet: Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prilagoditvi nekaterih aktov, za katere se uporablja postopek iz člena 251 Pogodbe, sklepu Sveta 1999/468/ES, kakor je bil spremenjen s sklepom 2006/512/ES, glede regulativnega postopka s pregledom (OMNIBUS II) (KOM(2007)824)
Subject: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (OMNIBUS II) (COM(2007) 824)
Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja je pregledal omenjeni predlog, tj. točke 4.2, 4.3., 6.1 in 6.4 priloge.
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development has scrutinized the above mentioned proposal, i.e. Annex 4.2, 4.3., 6.1 and 6.4.
Točka 4.3 priloge– Direktiva 2001/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. decembra 2001 o statističnih raziskovanjih, ki jih izvedejo države članice, da ugotovijo pridelovalno zmogljivost intenzivnih sadovnjakov nekaterih vrst sadnega drevja
Annex 4.3 - Directive 2001/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 concerning the statistical surveys to be carried out by the Member States in order to determine the production potential of plantations of certain species of fruit trees
Odbor ne nasprotuje predlagani prilagoditvi, saj se vsi postopki komitologije spremenijo v regulativni postopek s pregledom.
As far as Annex 4.3 is concerned COMAGRI has no objections to the proposed realignment, as all comitology-procedures are changed to regulatory procedures with scrutiny (RPS).
Točka 4.2 priloge – Direktiva 2001/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. decembra 2001 o statističnih raziskovanjih, ki jih izvedejo države članice, da ugotovijo pridelovalno zmogljivost intenzivnih sadovnjakov nekaterih vrst sadnega drevja Pri točki 4.2 priloge je očitno prišlo do napake.
Annex 4.2 - Directive 2001/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 concerning the statistical surveys to be carried out by the Member States in order to determine the production potential of plantations of certain species of fruit trees As far as Annex 4.2 is concerned, a mistake seems to have occurred.
V točki 3 je regulativni postopek (brez pregleda) predviden za ukrepe, sprejete v skladu s členoma 4(2) in 6(1)".
In Point 3 the regulatory procedure (no scrutiny) is foreseen for measures taken according to "Article 4(2) and Article 6(1)".
Očitno je bil člen 4(2) črtan z direktivo Direktivo 2003/107/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. decembra 2003 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 96/16/ES o statističnih raziskovanjih mleka in mlečnih proizvodov (UL L 7 13.1.2003, str.
It seems as if Article 4(2) has been deleted through Directive 2003/107/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 December 2003 amending Council Directive 96/16/EC on statistical surveys of milk and milk products (OJ L 7 13.1.2003, p.
Hkrati je bil v členu 5(2) uveden nov regulativni postopek, ki sploh ni bil omenjen.
At the same time a new regulatory procedure has been introduced in Article 5(2) which has not been mentioned at all.
Glede na to, da člena 5(2) in 6(1) zadevata le standardne oblike, ne nasprotujemo predlaganemu regulativnemu postopku brez pregleda.
As Article 5(2) and 6(1) only concern standard forms, there are no objections to the proposed regulatory procedure without scrutiny.
Točka 6.1 priloge – Direktiva Sveta 79/373/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o trženju krmnih mešanic Glede točke 6.1 priloge je bil Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja običajno pristojni odbor za zadnja poročila v zvezi s predlogi spremembe Direktive Sveta 79/373/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o trženju krmnih mešanic.
Annex 6.1 - Council Directive 79/373/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the marketing of compound feedingstuffs As far Annex 6.1. is concerned, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development has traditionally been the lead-committee on the last reports concerning amendments to Council Directive 79/373/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the marketing of compound feeding stuffs.
Predlagamo, da se regulativni postopek s pregledom uporablja za postopek iz točke a) ter iz točke b) člena 10, saj se oba nanašata na ukrepe splošnega obsega, ki spreminjajo nebistvene določbe direktive.
We do propose to use the regulatory procedure with scrutiny for the procedure foreseen in Article 10 point a) as well as point in b), as they concern measures of general scope amending non-essential elements of the directive.
Točka 6.4 priloge– Direktiva 2002/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. maja 2002 o nezaželenih snoveh v živalski krmi Glede točke 6.4 priloge je bil Odboru za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja dodeljen postopek okrepljenega sodelovanja za izvirni pravni akt.
Annex 6.4 - Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed As far as Annex 6.4 is concerned the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development was attributed enhanced cooperation procedure for the original legal act.
Glede predlaganih sprememb nimamo ugovorov.
We have no objections to the proposed changes.
predsednik Pripravljavec(-ka) mnenja
Chairman Draftsman
MNENJE ODBORA ZA DRŽAVLJANSKE SVOBOŠČINE, PRAVOSODJE IN NOTRANJE ZADEVE
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS
Odbora za pravne zadeve
Legal Affairs Committee
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve je bil zaprošen za mnenje v zvezi s točko 2.7 (uredbe (ES) št. 273/2004 z dne 11. februarja 2004)
LIBE Committee was asked to do an opinion on the point 2.7 (Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of 11 February 2004)
Uredba (ES) št. 273/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. februarja 2004 o predhodnih sestavinah pri prepovedanih drogah, UL L 47, 18.2.2004, str.1 priloge predloga Komisije o prilagoditvi regulativnemu postopku s pregledom ( drugi predlog „omnibus “)
Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors, OJ L 47, 18.2.2004, p.1 of the Annex of the Commission's proposal on adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny ( Second Omnibus proposal )
Drugi del.
Part Two.
Zato bi vas rad v imenu Odbora
Consequently and on behalf of the Committee,
6. marca 2008 je Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve sklenil, da podpre predlog Komisije.
On 6 th March, 2008, LIBE Committee has decided to support the proposal of the Commission.
Nekaj poslancev pa je izrazilo mnenje, da bi bilo treba postopek komitologije iz člena 9 in člena 14(f) uredbe (ES) št. 273/2004 prilagoditi regulativnemu postopku s pregledom (namesto da se ohrani postopek upravljanja).
However, some Members have expressed the opinion that comitology procedure provided for in Article 9 and Article 14(f) of the Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 should be adapted to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (instead of maintaining the management procedure).
S spoštovanjem
Gérard DEPREZ
o poenostavljenem poslovnem okolju za podjetja na področjih prava družb, računovodstva in revidiranja
on a simplified business environment for companies in the areas of company law, accounting and auditing
Ieke van den Burg , Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve
Ieke van den Burg , Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori - člen 47 poslovnika
(*) Associated committee - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (*) ......10
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori - člen 47 poslovnika
(*) Associated committee – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Evropa rezultatov – uporaba prava Skupnosti“ ( KOM(2007)0502 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication ‘A Europe of results – Applying Community law’ ( COM(2007)0502 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „o poenostavljenem poslovnem okolju za podjetja na področjih prava družb, računovodstva in revidiranja“ ( KOM(2007)0394 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication on 'A simplified business environment for companies in the areas of company law, accounting and auditing' ( COM(2007)0394 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij „Mala in srednje velika podjetja – ključna za zagotavljanje rasti in delovnih mest.
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on ‘Small and medium-sized enterprises – Key for delivering more growth and jobs.
Vmesni pregled sodobne politike MSP“ ( KOM(2007)0592 ),
A mid-term review of Modern SME policy’ ( COM(2007)0592 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za konkurenčnost z njegove 2832. seje na temo „poenostavljeno poslovno okolje za podjetja na področjih prava družb, računovodstva in revidiranja“,
– having regard to the conclusions of the 2832nd Competitiveness Council of 22-23 November 2007 on 'a simplified business environment for companies in the areas of company law, accounting and auditing',
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6‑0101/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0101/2008 ),
Možnost 1
On Option 1
4. v zvezi s prvo možnostjo opozarja, da je treba v obsežni presoji vplivov primerjati pričakovane prihranke pri odpravi direktiv s stroški notranjega trga s sedemindvajsetimi različnimi sistemi prava družb;
Notes in connection with Option 1 that, in a comprehensive impact assessment, the savings expected to result from the repeal of directives must be set against the cost of an internal market with 27 different systems of company law;
Izvajanje v državah članicah
Implementation by the Member States
7. priporoča, da se davčni organi držav članic med seboj uskladijo in kot osnovo za poenostavitev opredelijo skupne informacije, ki jih morajo posredovati podjetja;
Proposes that coordination be introduced between the Member States’ tax authorities, so as to harmonise the information requests made to businesses in the interests of simplification;
Možnost 2
On Option 2
9. poudarja, da bo mogoče učinke sprememb direktiv oceniti šele čez čas, ter opozarja, da sta bili 3. in 6. direktiva o pravu družb pred kratkim spremenjeni z Direktivo 2007/63/ES
Stresses that time will be needed in order to evaluate the effects of the changes made to the directives and points out that the Third and Sixth Company Law Directives have recently been amended by Directive 2007/63/EC
Direktiva 2007/63/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. novembra 2007 o spremembi Direktiv 78/855/EGS in 82/891/EGS Sveta v zvezi z zahtevo po poročilu neodvisnega strokovnjaka v povezavi z združitvijo ali delitvijo delniških družb (UL L 300, 17.11.2007, str.
Directive 2007/63/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 amending Council Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC as regards the requirement of an independent expert’s report on the occasion of merger or division of public limited liability companies (OJ L 300, 17.11.2007, p.
47). in da se rok za prenos te direktive izteče 31. decembra 2008; se boji, da bi lahko zaradi nadaljnjih sprememb teh direktiv usklajena pravila pretvorbe ostala brez vsebine;
47). and that the transposition deadline for this directive is 31 December 2008; fears that further amendments to these directives could lead to the harmonised company conversion rules being deprived of substance;
Direktiva 2006/68/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2006 o spremembi Direktive 77/91/EGS Sveta v zvezi z ustanovitvijo delniških družb in ohranjanja ter spreminjanja njihovega kapitala (UL L 264, 25.9.2006, str.
Notes that the Second Company Law Directive has recently been amended by Directive 2006/68/EC
32). in da se rok za prenos te direktive izteče 15. aprila 2008; v zvezi s tem opozarja na rezultate študije KPMG o izvedljivosti alternativnega sistema ohranjanja kapitala;
Directive 2006/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 amending Council Directive 77/91/EEC as regards the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital (OJ L 264, 25.9.2006, p.32). and that the transposition deadline for this directive is 15 April 2008; highlights in this connection the results of the KPMG feasibility study on an alternative capital maintenance regime;
13. poudarja, da spremembe računovodskih pravil EU iz leta 2006 med drugim vsebujejo zahtevo za poročilo o upravljanju podjetja in izboljšano razkritje zunajbilančnih poslov družb, ki kotirajo na borzi; opozarja, da je rok za prenos teh pravil 5. septembra 2008; spodbuja države članice k zgodnjemu izvrševanju teh pravil; poziva Komisijo, naj sodeluje s Svetom za mednarodne računovodske standarde (IASB) in nadalje izboljša obveščanje o zunajbilančnih instrumentih v letnih poročilih;
Underlines that 2006 amendments to EU-accounting rules require, inter alia, a corporate governance statement and improved disclosure of off-balance sheet arrangements by listed companies; recalls that the transposition deadline of those rules is 5 September 2008; encourages Member States' early application of the rules; asks the Commission to engage with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to improve financial statement information on off-balance sheet vehicles further;
17. opozarja, da je, skupaj z mejnimi vrednostmi po 4. in 7. direktivi o pravu družb za oprostitev MSP od določenih obveznosti na področju računovodstva in revizije, stabilno in izračunljivo upravljanje pomembno za pravno varnost in za omejevanje upravnih stroškov podjetij; v tem oziru opozarja na to, da je vprašljive mejne vrednosti iz 4. direktive spremenila ravno direktiva 2006/46/ES
Points out, in connection with the thresholds laid down in the Fourth and Seventh Directives for exempting SME's from certain accounting and auditing requirements, that stable and predictable regulation is an important element in legal certainty and keeping down business administration costs; stresses in this connection that on the one hand the thresholds in question under the Fourth Directive have just been amended by Directive 2006/46/EC
18. izrecno poziva Komisijo, da ukrepa v zvezi s pozivom Sveta v njegovih sklepih s 22. in 23. novembra 2007 po dejavnem spodbujanju odprte izmenjave najboljših praks med državami članicami o racionalizaciji obveznosti objave in o pogostejši rabi elektronskih pripomočkov v odnosih med podjetji in javnimi upravami ter med podjetji samimi;
Urges the Commission to follow up on the call expressed by Council in its Conclusions of 22-23 November 2007 for active promotion of an open exchange amongst Member States on best practices designed to streamline reporting requirements and for an increase in the use of electronic means in relationships between undertakings and public administrations and between undertakings;
Direktiva 2003/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. novembra 2003 o prospektu, ki ga je treba objaviti ob javni ponudbi ali sprejemu v trgovanje vrednostnih papirjev (UL L 345, 31.12.2003, str.
Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2008/11/ES (UL L 76, 19.3.2008, str.
Amended by Directive 2008/11/EC (OJ L 76, 19.3.2008, p.
37). ali 4. in 7. direktive o pravu družb;
37). and the Fourth and Seventh Companies Directives;
21. poudarja, da je treba pri vzpostavitvi poenostavljenega poslovnega okolja oblikovati tudi nov pravni okvir za podjetja; v povezavi s tem navaja 14. direktivo o pravu družb o čezmejni spremembi registriranega sedeža in pravico, da podjetje izbere eno- ali dvotirni sistem upravljanja, ter zakonodajni predlog o evropskem podjetju v zasebni lasti, ki ga je Komisija predvidela do sredine leta 2008;
Stresses that the creation of a simplified business environment also implies the need to create a new legal framework for undertakings; refers in this context to the Fourteenth Company Law Directive on the cross-border transfer of the registered office of limited companies, the right to choose between monistic and dualistic business forms, and the Commission’s legislative proposal for a European private company expected by mid-2008;
Posledice sodbe Sodišča o VW
Consequences of the ECJ's Volkswagen judgment
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 10.7.2007 (KOM(2007) 394 konč.) o poenostavljenem poslovnem okolju za podjetja na področjih prava družb, računovodstva in revidiranja
Commission communication of 10 July 2007 ( COM(2007)0394 ) on a simplified business environment for companies in the areas of company law, accounting and auditing
V svojem sporočilu z dne 10.7.2007 Komisija opozarja, da je nujen obširen pregled pravnega reda EU na področju evropskega prava družb, računovodstva in revidiranja, da bi evropskim podjetjem omogočili večjo konkurenčnost in večjo uspešnost na zelo konkurenčnem svetovnem trgu.
In its communication of 10 July 2007 the Commission notes that a broad review of the EU acquis in the area of European business law is indispensable to allow European businesses to compete more effectively and to be more successful in a highly competitive global environment.
Komisija vidi predvsem dve možnosti , kako ukrepati v primeru nekaterih direktiv o pravu družb, ki obravnavajo predvsem nacionalne razmere :
The Commission considers there are essentially two options on how to proceed for certain company law directives that address mainly domestic situations :
– prva možnost je obravnavati vprašanje, ali so dandanes vse veljavne direktive še vedno potrebne ali pa je treba pravni red EU na področju prava družb skrčiti na tiste pravne akte, ki se posebej nanašajo na čezmejna vprašanja,
– The first option is to address the question whether today all existing directives are still needed or whether the EU acquis in the area of company law should be reduced to those legal acts specifically dealing with cross-border problems.
– druga, precej manj daljnosežna možnost , vključuje samo osredotočenje na konkretne, posamezne ukrepe poenostavitve v prid podjetjem v EU.
– The second, less far-reaching option consists in focusing only on concrete, individual simplification measures in order to help EU companies.
V zvezi s preostalim pravnim redom na področju prava družb , ki se nanaša na določena čezmejna vprašanja, ter s področji računovodstva in revidiranja se Komisiji zdijo posamezni ukrepi poenostavitve pravi odgovor .
With regard to the rest of the company law acquis that addresses specific cross-border problems as well as to the areas of accounting and auditing , the Commission considers individual simplification measures to be the right response.
Če se odpravljanje ne zdi primerno, je treba pojasniti koristi veljavnih pravil na ravni EU in zakaj te koristi odtehtajo stroške, ki so povezani z njimi.
If such repeal is not considered appropriate it should be explained what the benefits are of having these rules at EU level and why these benefits outweigh the costs related to them.
Sporočilo Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z dne 4.10.2007 (KOM(2007) 592 konč.) „Mala in srednje velika podjetja – ključna za zagotavljanje rasti in delovnih mest.
Communication of 4 October 2007 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ( COM(2007)0592 ) on ‘Small and medium-sized enterprises - Key for delivering more growth and jobs.
Vmesni pregled sodobne politike MSP“
A mid-term review of Modern SME policy’.
Mejne vrednosti za MSP se v glavnem znižajo, zato so le-ta širše opredeljena.
Essentially the threshold values for SMEs are lowered, resulting in a broader definition of ‘small and medium-sized enterprise’.
Mnenje poročevalca
Your rapporteur’s view
Poročevalec pozdravlja manj daljnosežno možnost, da se poenostavi vsaj dele 3., 6. in verjetno tudi 2. direktive o pravu družb.
Your rapporteur welcomes the less far-reaching alternative of simplifying at least parts of the Third, the Sixth and probably also the Second Company Law Directive.
V zdajšnji obliki te direktive vsebujejo tako podrobna pravila, da državam članicam dopuščajo malo prožnosti za prilagoditev njihovih nacionalnih sistemov na razvijajoče se potrebe podjetij in zainteresiranih strani na splošno.
In their present form these directives contain such detailed provisions that the Member States are left with hardly any scope to adapt their national rules to the developing needs of firms and stakeholders in general.
Z današnjega vidika se zdijo pretirane zlasti številne zahteve za poročanje, vsebovane v 3. in 6. direktivi.
In particular some of the reporting requirements in the Third and Sixth Directives seem to be out of date.
Načini objave informacij o podjetjih, ki jih določata ti direktivi, še vedno ne upoštevajo vseh možnosti, ki jih ponuja sodobna tehnologija.
The way in which information on companies is required to be published under these directives still does not take into account all the opportunities offered by present-day technology.
V skladu s pravili 1. direktive o pravu družb morajo biti nekatere informacije, ki jih je treba vnesti v registre gospodarskih družb držav članic, objavljene tudi v nacionalnih uradnih listih.
Under the terms of the First Company Law Directive , certain information requiring to be entered in the commercial register of the Member States also has to be published in the national legal gazettes.
Posebne zahteve v zvezi z razkritji podružnic 11. direktive o pravu družb zaradi nacionalnih formalnih zahtev prinašajo precejšnje stroške za veliko podjetij.
The special disclosure requirements for branches in the Eleventh Company Law Directive entail considerable costs for many companies owing to national procedural rules.
Te stroške je treba kar se da zmanjšati, tako da se omeji možnost formalnih zahtev držav članic.
These costs must be reduced to a minimum by restricting the scope to enact national procedural rules.
Predlog iz Priloge 3 za prilagoditev Statuta evropske družbe najnovejši sodni praksi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti bi bilo mogoče izvesti hkrati s predlaganimi ukrepi posodobitve in poenostavitve.
The proposal in Annex 3, for adapting the status of the European Company in line with the most recent case law of the European Court of Justice, could be implemented in tandem with the proposed modernisation and simplification measures.
Na področju računovodstva in revidiranja bi imela mala in srednje velika podjetja koristi od nadaljnje poenostavitve direktiv.
In the fields of accounting and auditing, a further simplification of the directives would benefit small and medium-sized enterprises.
S 4., 7. in 8. direktivo so usklajene zahteve za računovodstvo in revidiranje znatno izboljšale kakovost finančnega poročanja in revidiranja.
The Fourth, Seventh and Eighth Directives have significantly improved the quality of financial reporting and auditing through harmonised accounting and auditing rules.