natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za reševanje odškodninskih sporov je pristojno Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities shall have jurisdiction in any dispute over the remedying of such damage.
Osebna finančna in disciplinska odgovornost uslužbencev Urada do Urada je urejena z ustreznimi določbami, ki se uporabljajo za uslužbence Urada.
The personal financial and disciplinary liability of the Office staff towards the Office shall be governed by the relevant provisions applying to the staff of the Office.
POGLAVJE IIIa
CHAPTER IIIa FINAL PROVISIONS
Ocenjevalno poročilo vključuje dosežene rezultate in delovne metode organa BEREC in Urada v povezavi z njunimi cilji, pooblastili in nalogami, ki so za vsakega posebej opredeljeni v tej uredbi in njunih letnih delovnih programih.
The evaluation report shall cover the results achieved by BEREC and the Office and their respective working methods, in relation to their respective objectives, mandates and tasks defined in this Regulation and in their respective annual work programmes.
Ocenjevalno poročilo upošteva stališča zainteresiranih strani tako na ravni Skupnosti kot na nacionalni ravni ter se pošlje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The evaluation report shall take into account the views of stakeholders, at both Community and national level and shall be forwarded to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Evropski parlament izda mnenje o ocenjevalnem poročilu.
The European Parliament shall issue an opinion on the evaluation report.
Kaj storiti, da bo organ BERT ustrezal ciljem: usklajevanje nalog z organizacijskimi sredstvi
Making BERT fit the purpose: matching tasks and organisational resources
Organ evropskih regulatorjev za telekomunikacije (organ BERT), specializirano in neodvisno strokovno svetovalno telo za pomoč pri izvajanju regulativnega okvira EU za elektronske komunikacije, bo ostal neodvisen od Komisije, vlad, posameznih nacionalnih regulativnih organov in sektorja.
The Body of European Regulators in Telecom, BERT, will be a specialised and independent expert advisory body in order to assist in the implementation of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications, and would remain independent from the European Commission, the governments, the individual NRA's and the sector.
Organ BERT bi deloval kot glavno svetovalno telo ne le za Komisijo, temveč tudi za posamezne nacionalne regulativne organe, da bi se po vsej Evropski uniji spodbujal usklajen regulativni pristop.
BERT would act as the main advisory body to the Commission, but also to the individual NRA's in order to promote a consistent regulatory approach across the European Union.
Svoja stališča bi izražal prosto in ne na zahtevo Komisije.
BERT will express its views freely and not only upon the request of the Commission.
Organ BERT mora na evropski ravni dopolnjevati (in ne nadomestiti) regulativne funkcije, ki jih na nacionalni ravni izvajajo regulativni organi, zlasti z zagotavljanjem: okvira za sodelovanje nacionalnih regulativnih organov, regulativnega nadzora opredelitev trgov, analize problemov in njihovega reševanja, opredelitve nadnacionalnih trgov in splošne informativne in svetovalne funkcije za vprašanja, povezana z okvirno direktivo in posebnimi direktivami.
BERT must complement at European level -but not replace- the regulatory tasks performed at national level by the regulatory authorities, in particular by providing: a framework for national regulatory authorities to cooperate; regulatory oversight of market definitions; analysis and implementation of remedies; definition of transnational markets; and general informational and advisory functions on issues related to the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives.
Za sedanje usklajevalno razmerje na podlagi načela subsidiarnosti obstaja neki raison d'être , notranji trg pa je v resnici še vedno nabor številnih različnih manjših nacionalnih trgov s svojimi značilnostmi in lastno dinamiko.
The current balance of coordination, based on the subsidiarity principle, has its particular raison d'être and the reality of the internal market is that it is still a collection of many different national sub-markets, with their own particular characteristics and dynamics.
Skladnost v regulativnih posegih danes pomeni zagotavljanje, da urejanje poteka sorazmerno in da se pri tem obravnavajo posebna konkurenčna vprašanja, ki se porajajo v nekem času in kraju; za to so najbolj pristojni tamkajšnji nacionalni regulativni organi.
Coherence in regulatory intervention today means ensuring that regulation is applied proportionately, whilst addressing the specific competition issues that arise at a particular place and time, and the best placed to do so are the NRAs who are on the ground.
BERT bo v celoti odgovoren in pregleden za pristojne institucije Evropske unije.
BERT shall be fully accountable and transparent to the relevant European Union institutions.
Poročevalka je kljub vsemu prepričana, da je treba zagotoviti ustrezno podporo za vse pomembne dejavnosti ter učinkovito in sistematično spremljanje sredstev in rezultatov teh dejavnosti, da se organu BERT zagotovi dobro opravljanje mandata, kar bo dalo dodatno vrednost razvoju notranjega trga za elektronske komunikacije.
However the rapporteur is convinced that for BERT to carry out its mandate properly adding value to the development of the electronic communications internal market it is crucial to ensure sufficient support for all relevant activities and an effective and systematic follow-up of means and of the results of those activities.
Poročevalka je tudi prepričana, da morata biti glede na pomembno funkcijo, ki jo bo organ BERT opravljal pri izvajanju in razvoju regulativnega okvira Skupnosti za elektronske komunikacije, odbor regulatorjev in služba za pomoč tega organa ustanovljena v pravnem okviru Skupnosti, pregledno in odgovorno ter pod demokratičnim nadzorom sozakonodajalcev ter morata na enak način tudi delovati.
The rapporteur also believes that in view of the significant functions that BERT will carry out in the implementation and development of the Community electronic communications regulatory framework, its Board of Regulators and Support Office must be set up and operate within the Community legal framework in a transparent and accountable manner and subject to democratic oversight by the co-legislators.
Taka struktura bo namreč zagotavljala največjo možno neodvisnost brez oviranja skladnosti.
Indeed, this structure will allow a maximum guarantee of independence without hampering its coherence.
Enako pomembno je zagotoviti, da se pomoč izvaja učinkovito in da ostaja prožna pri prevzemanju novih nalog in sprejemanju dodatnih sredstev, samo če bo organ BERT sposoben dokazati svoj pozitiven učinek in če tako v proračunskem postopku odločita Svet in Parlament.
It is also equally important to guarantee that this support function is efficiently implemented and remains flexible taking up new tasks and receiving more resources only if BERT is able to prove its positive impact and if so decided by the Council and Parliament through the budgetary procedure.
Služba za pomoč bi pod vodstvom odbora regulatorjev usklajevala delo regulativnega organa na osnovi strokovnosti zaposlenih v delovnih skupinah nacionalnih regulativnih organov.
Under the direction of the Board of Regulators, the support office would coordinate the works of the Body of Regulators drawing upon the expertise of staff of the national regulatory authorities working groups.
Zaposlene bo vodil odbor regulatorjev, hkrati pa bodo zanje veljali kadrovski predpisi za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti in pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti, na podlagi katerih morajo zaposleni v Skupnosti svoje naloge opravljati izključno v interesu Skupnosti ter objektivno, nepristransko in lojalno do Skupnosti.
Its staff would be under the direction of the Board of Regulators but at the same time subject to the staff regulations of officials and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities which bind Community servants to carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with the interests of the Communities in mind and to carry out their duties objectively, impartially and loyally to the Communities.
Takšne zahteve so nujne, da se zagotovi visoka stopnja neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti, zahtevana za zaposlene, ki opravljajo regulativne funkcije.
These obligations are essential for assuring the high level of independence and impartially required for staff involved in regulatory functions.
Ne glede na to bodo v službi organa BERT za pomoč lahko za določen čas sodelovali tudi nacionalni strokovnjaki in s tem ob povratku v njihove nacionalne regulativne organe prinesli dodatno strokovno znanje in izkušnje iz evropske razsežnosti trga telekomunikacij.
Nevertheless national experts could be detached to BERT's support office for a limited period of time and bring additional expertise and know-how on the European dimension of the Telecoms market when they return to their national regulatory authorities.
Alexander Alvaro, Ivo Belet, Göran Färm, Juan Fraile Cantón, Françoise Grossetête, Malcolm Harbour, Gunnar Hökmark, Erika Mann, Vittorio Prodi, Hannes Swoboda, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Uručhev, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Alexander Alvaro, Ivo Belet, Göran Färm, Juan Fraile Cantón, Françoise Grossetête, Malcolm Harbour, Gunnar Hökmark, Erika Mann, Vittorio Prodi, Hannes Swoboda, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Urutchev, Lambert van Nistelrooij
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktiv 2002/12/ES o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, 2002/19/ES o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju ter 2002/20/ES o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA...............................4
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION...............................................5
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (16496/1/2008 – C6‑0066/2009 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (16496/1/2008 – C6 0066/2009),
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0449 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0697 ),
Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0449 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0697 ),
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2008)0724 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2008)0724 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6‑0272/2009 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0272/2009 ),
o skupnem stališču Sveta o DIREKTIVI EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA o spremembah direktiv 2002/21/ES o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, 2002/19/ES o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju in 2002/20/ES o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev
to the Council common position for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services
EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE STA —
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. septembra 2008 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu), Skupno stališče Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2009 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne xx maja 2009 . ,
Opinion of the European Parliament of 24 September 2008 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Council Common Position of 16 February 2009 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Position of the European Parliament of xx May 2009 . ,
(1) Komisija redno pregleduje delovanje petih direktiv, ki sestavljajo obstoječi regulativni okvir za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (Direktiva 2002/21/ES (Okvirna direktiva)
(1) The functioning of the five directives comprising the existing EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive)
33. , Direktiva 2002/19/ES (Direktiva o dostopu)
33. , Directive 2002/19/EC (Access Directive)
7. , Direktiva 2002/20/ES (Direktiva o odobritvi)
7. , Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive)
51. in Direktiva 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah)
51. , and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications)
37. (skupaj "Okvirna direktiva in posebne direktive")), da bi zlasti ugotovila, ali jih je treba glede na razvoj tehnologije in trga spremeniti.
37. (together referred to as "the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives")) is subject to periodic review by the Commission, with a view in particular to determining the need for modification in the light of technological and market developments.
(2) V zvezi s tem je Komisija predstavila svoje prve ugotovitve v Sporočilu z dne 29. junija 2006 o pregledu regulativnega okvira EU za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve.
(2) In that regard, the Commission presented its initial findings in its Communication of 29 June 2006 on the review of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services.
Na podlagi teh prvih ugotovitev je bilo organizirano javno posvetovanje, v okviru katerega je bilo opredeljeno, da je najpomembnejši vidik, ki ga je treba obravnavati, vzpostavitev še vedno nedelujočega notranjega trga za elektronske komunikacije.
On the basis of these initial findings, a public consultation was held, which identified the continued lack of an internal market for electronic communications as the most important aspect needing to be addressed.
Zlasti regulativna razdrobljenost in neskladja med dejavnostmi nacionalnih regulativnih organov so tisti dejavniki, ki ogrožajo konkurenčnost sektorja in znatne koristi, ki jih imajo potrošniki od čezmejne konkurence.
In particular, regulatory fragmentation and inconsistencies between the activities of the national regulatory authorities were found to jeopardise not only the competitiveness of the sector, but also the substantial consumer benefits from cross-border competition.
(3) Regulativni okvir EU za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve bi bilo treba zato preoblikovati, da bi se dokončno vzpostavil notranji trg za elektronske komunikacije, in sicer z okrepitvijo mehanizma Skupnosti za regulacijo obratovalcev s pomembno tržno močjo na ključnih trgih.
(3) The EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services should therefore be reformed in order to complete the internal market for electronic communications by strengthening the Community mechanism for regulating operators with significant market power in the key markets.
To dopolnjuje Uredba (ES) št. .../2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne ... o [ustanovitvi Organa evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije (BEREC) ].
This is complemented by Regulation (EC) No …/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... [establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications ( BEREC )]
+ UL Vstaviti številko, datum in podrobnosti objave navedene uredbe v Uradnem listu. + .
+ OJ: Please insert number, date and publication reference of that Regulation. + .
Reforma vključuje tudi opredelitev učinkovite in usklajene strategije upravljanja spektra, da se vzpostavi enotni evropski informacijski prostor in izboljšajo določbe za uporabnike invalide ter tako doseže vključujoča informacijska družba.
The reform also includes the definition of an efficient and coordinated spectrum management strategy in order to achieve a single European information space and the reinforcement of provisions for users with disabilities in order to obtain an inclusive information society.
(4) Cilj je, da bi ob razvoju konkurence na trgu postopno odpravili ex ante pravila, specifična za ta sektor, tako da bi elektronske komunikacije nazadnje urejalo le konkurenčno pravo.
(4) The aim is progressively to reduce ex ante sector specific rules as competition in the markets develops and, ultimately, for electronic communications to be governed by competition law only.
Zaradi močne konkurenčne dinamike na trgih elektronskih komunikacij v zadnjih letih je nujno zagotoviti, da se ex ante regulativne obveznosti naložijo le, če ni učinkovite in trajnostne konkurence.
Considering that the markets for electronic communications have shown strong competitive dynamics in recent years, it is essential that ex ante regulatory obligations should only be imposed where there is no effective and sustainable competition.
(4a) Pri ocenjevanju učinkovanja okvirne direktive in posebnih direktiv bi Komisija morala oceniti, ali so ob upoštevanju razvoja na trgu in glede na konkurenco in varstvo potrošnikov še potrebne določbe o ureditvi ex ante za posamezne sektorje iz členov 8 do 13a Direktive 2002/19/ES (Direktiva o dostopu) ter člena 17 Direktive 2002/22/ES (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah), ali jih je treba spremeniti ali razveljaviti.
(4a) In carrying out its reviews of the functioning of the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives, the Commission should assess whether, in the light of developments in the market and with regard to both competition and consumer protection, there is continued need for the provisions on sector specific ex ante regulation laid down in Articles 8 to 13a of Directive 2002/19/EC (Access Directive) and Article 17 of Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) or whether they should be amended or repealed.
(5) Da bi se lahko na spreminjajoče se konkurenčne razmere odzivali sorazmerno in prilagojeno, bi bilo treba nacionalnim regulativnim organom omogočiti , da opredelijo trge na podnacionalni ravni in/ali odpravijo regulativne obveznosti na trgih in/ali geografskih območjih, na katerih obstaja učinkovita infrastrukturna konkurenca.
(5) In order to ensure a proportionate and adaptable approach to varying competitive conditions, national regulatory authorities should be able to define markets on a sub-national basis and to lift regulatory obligations in markets and/or geographic areas where there is effective infrastructure competition.
(6) Za doseganje ciljev lizbonske agende je treba zagotoviti ustrezne pobude za naložbe v nova visokohitrostna omrežja, ki bodo podpirale inovacije v internetnih storitvah z bogato vsebino in okrepile mednarodno konkurenčnost Evropske unije.
(6) In order to achieve the goals of the Lisbon Agenda it is necessary to give appropriate ince n tives for investment in new high-speed networks that will support innovation in content-rich internet services and strengthen the international competitiveness of the European Union.
Taka omrežja lahko zelo koristijo potrošnikom in podjetjem v celotni Evropski uniji.
Such networks have enormous potential to deliver benefits to consumers and businesses across the European Union.
Zato je bistveno spodbujati trajne naložbe v razvoj teh novih omrežij, pri tem pa je treba zagotoviti regulativno predvidljivost in skladnost ter tako varovati konkurenco in povečevati možnost izbire za potrošnike.
It is therefore vital to promote sustainable investment in the development of these new networks, while safeguarding competition and boosting consumer choice through regulatory predictability and consistency.
(6a) Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 20. marca 2006 z naslovom"Premoščanje širokopasovne vrzeli"
(6a) In its Communication of 20 March 2006 entitled “Bridging the Broadband Gap”
UL C 151, 29.6.2006, str.
OJ C 151, 29.6.2006, p.
. ugotavlja, da v Evropski uniji obstaja teritorialna vrzel pri dostopu do širokopasovnih storitev z visoko hitrostjo prenosa.
. , the Commission acknowledged that there is a territorial divide in the European Union regarding access to high-speed broadband services.
Lažji dostop do radijskega spektra bo v oddaljenih regijah pospešil razvoj širokopasovnih storitev z visoko hitrostjo prenosa.
Easier access to radio spectrum will facilitate the development of high-speed broadband services in remote regions.
Kljub splošnemu povečanju števila širokopasovnih priključkov je dostop v različnih regijah omejen zaradi visokih stroškov, ki so posledica nizke gostote prebivalstva in oddaljenosti.
Despite the general increase in broadband connectivity, access in various regions is limited on account of high costs resulting from low population densities and remoteness.
Za zagotovitev naložb v nove tehnologije v manj razvitih regijah bi morala biti ureditev na področju elektronskih komunikacij v skladu z drugimi politikami, kot so politika državne pomoči, kohezijska politika ali cilji širše industrijske politike.
In order to ensure investment in new technologies in underdeveloped regions, electronic communications regulation should be consistent with other policies, such as state aid policy, cohesion policy or the aims of wider industrial policy.
(6b) Javne naložbe v omrežja bi se morale opraviti v skladu z načelom nediskriminacije.
( 6b ) Public investment in networks should be made in accordance with the principle of non-discrimination .
Pri tem bi bilo treba odločitve o dodelitvi javne podpore sprejemati v okviru odprtih, preglednih in konkurenčnih postopkov.
In so doing, public support should be given by means of open, transparent and competitive procedures.
(7) Da bi nacionalnim regulativnim organom omogočili doseganje ciljev, določenih v Okvirni direktivi in posebnih direktivah, zlasti v zvezi s celovito medobratovalnostjo, bi bilo treba področje uporabe Okvirne direktive razširiti, da bi vključevala tudi nekatere vidike radijske opreme in telekomunikacijske terminalske opreme, kot je opredeljena v Direktivi 1999/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 1999 o radijski opremi in telekomunikacijski terminalski opremi ter medsebojnem priznavanju skladnosti te opreme
(7) In order to allow national regulatory authorities to meet the objectives set out in the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives, in particular concerning end-to-end interoperability, the scope of the Framework Directive should be extended to cover certain aspects of radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment as defined in Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity
UL L 91, 7.4.1999, str.
OJ L 91, 7.4.1999, p.
10. , pa tudi porabniško opremo, ki se uporablja za digitalno televizijo, s čimer bi poenostavili dostop za uporabnike invalide.
10. and consumer equipment used for digital television, in order to facilitate access for disabled users.
(8) Nekatere opredelitve bi bilo treba pojasniti ali spremeniti, se bo upoštevalo razvoj tehnologije in trga in da bodo odpravljene nejasnosti, ugotovljene pri izvajanju regulativnega okvira.
(8) Certain definitions should be clarified or changed to take account of market and technological developments and to eliminate ambiguities identified in implementing the regulatory framework.