natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pravo, ki ga izbereta zakonca ali registrirana partnerja , mora biti skladno s temeljnimi pravicami iz pogodb in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih človekovih pravicah.
The law chosen by the spouses or registered partners must be consonant with the fundamental rights enshrined in the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Možnost izbire prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti ali prenehanje registrirane partnerske zveze , ne sme posegati v načelo največje koristi otroka.
The possibility of choosing the law applicable to divorce and legal separation or to the dissolution of a registered partnership should not harm the superior interests of the child.
Zlasti ko razveza ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti zadeva otroke zakoncev, lahko pravo, ki se uporablja za razvezo ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, upošteva načela iz člena 24 listine, ki poudarja otrokove koristi, obvezo prisluhniti njihovemu mnenju pri odločitvah, ki jih zadevajo, in njihovo pravico ohraniti redne osebne odnose in neposreden stik z obema staršema, razen če je to v nasprotju z njihovimi koristmi.
In particular, when the divorce or the separation involves any children of the spouses, the law applicable to the divorce and legal separation can take into consideration the principles laid down in Article 24 of the Charter, placing emphasis on the best interests of the children, the duty to hear their opinion in decisions which concern them and the right to maintain regular personal relations and direct contact with both parents, unless it is against their interest to do so.
(15) Preden se določi pravo, ki se uporablja, je pomembno, da imata zakonca ali registrirana partnerja dostop do najnovejših informacij glede bistvenih vidikov nacionalne zakonodaje in prava Unije ter postopkov na področju razveze in prenehanja življenjske skupnosti ter prenehanja registriranega partnerstva, vključno z možnostjo mediacije .
(15) Before designating the applicable law, it is important for spouses or registered partners to have access to up-to-date information concerning the essential aspects of national and Union law and of the procedures governing divorce and legal separation and the dissolution of a registered partnership, including the option of mediation .
Zakonca morata biti obveščena o različnih oblikah razveze in pogojih za dosego razveze, ki so na voljo v zadevnih državah članicah.
Spouses should be informed about the different forms of divorce and the conditions for obtaining a divorce that exist in the laws of the Member States concerned.
Da se zagotovi dostop do ustreznih informacij, jih mora Komisija redno posodabljati na spletnem informacijskem sistemu za javnost, ki je bil vzpostavljen z Odločbo Sveta 2001/470/ES , države članice, v katerih poteka postopek razveze, pa morajo zakoncema dati na voljo vse potrebne informacije .
To guarantee such access to appropriate, good-quality information, the Commission regularly updates it in the Internet-based public information system set up by Council Decision 2001/470/EC , while the Member State in which the divorce proceedings take place should make available to the spouses all the information they need .
Zato se morajo nacionalni sodniki zavedati pomena ozaveščene izbire zakoncev v zvezi s pravnimi posledicami sklenjenega dogovora o izbiri prava.
Hence judges in the Member States should be aware of the importance of an informed choice on the part of the two spouses concerning the legal implications of the choice-of-law agreement concluded.
(16) Ozaveščena izbira zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev je temeljno načelo te uredbe.
(16) The informed choice of the two spouses or registered partners is a basic principle of this Regulation.
Vsak zakonec ali registrirani partner bi moral natančno vedeti, kakšne so pravne in socialne posledice izbire prava, ki se uporablja.
Each spouse /registered partner should know exactly what are the legal and social implications of the choice of applicable law.
Možnost, da se zakonca ali registrirana partnerja sporazumno dogovorita o pravu, ki se uporablja, ne sme posegati v njune pravice in enake možnosti.
The possibility of choosing the applicable law by common agreement should be without prejudice to the rights of, and equal opportunities for, the two spouses or registered partners .
Zato se morajo nacionalni sodniki zavedati pomena ozaveščene izbire zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev v zvezi s pravnimi posledicami sklenjenega dogovora o izbiri prava.
Hence judges in the Member States should be aware of the importance of an informed choice on the part of the two spouses /registered partners concerning the legal implications of the choice-of-law agreement concluded.
(17) Treba bi bilo uvesti določena jamstva, s katerimi se zagotovi, da se zakonca ali registrirana partnerja zavedata posledic svoje izbire.
(17) Certain safeguards should be introduced to ensure that spouses or registered partners are aware of the implications of their choice.
Če pa so v pravu udeležene države članice, v kateri imata zakonca ali registrirana partnerja običajno prebivališče, določeni dodatni formalni pogoji, bi bilo treba te pogoje spoštovati.
However, if the law of the participating Member State in which the two spouses /registered partners have their habitual residence lays down additional formal rules, those rules must be complied with.
Takšne navezne okoliščine so bile izbrane tako, da se zagotovi, da postopki glede razveze ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti potekajo v skladu s pravom, s katerim imata zakonca tesno povezavo, ter da temeljijo predvsem na pravu države njunega običajnega prebivališča.
These connecting factors have been chosen so that the divorce or legal separation proceeding is governed by a law with which the spouses have a close connection, and they are based first and foremost on the law of the spouses' habitual residence.
(19) Če zakonca nimata možnosti izbire prava, ki se uporablja, mora ta uredba določiti usklajena kolizijska pravila na podlagi različnih naveznih okoliščin, ki temeljijo na obstoju tesne povezave med zakoncema ali registriranima partnerjema in zadevnim pravom, da se zagotovita pravna varnost in predvidljivost, pa tudi preprečijo situacije, v katerih eden od zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev vloži tožbo za razvezo ali prenehanje njunega partnerstva pred drugim, s čimer zagotovi, da postopek poteka v skladu s tistim pravom, ki je po njegovem mnenju ugodnejši zanj.
(19) Where no applicable law is chosen, and with a view to guaranteeing legal certainty and predictability and preventing a situation from arising in which one of the spouses or registered partners applies for divorce or legal separation or dissolution of their partnership before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she considers more favourable to his or her own interests, this Regulation should introduce harmonised conflict-of-laws rules on the basis of a scale of successive connecting factors based on the existence of a close connection between the spouses /registered partners and the law concerned.
Takšne navezne okoliščine so bile izbrane tako, da se zagotovi, da postopki glede razveze ali prenehanja registriranega partnerstva potekajo v skladu s pravom, s katerim imata zakonca ali registrirana partnerja tesno povezavo, ter da temeljijo predvsem na pravu države njunega običajnega prebivališča.
These connecting factors have been chosen so that the proceeding for divorce or legal separation , or for dissolution of the registered partnership, is governed by a law with which the spouses /registered partners have a close connection, and they are based first and foremost on the law of the spouses' /registered partners' habitual residence.
(20) V določenih primerih, kadar pravo, ki se uporablja, bodisi ne predvideva razveze bodisi enemu od zakoncev zaradi spola ne daje enakih možnosti za razvezo ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, se uporablja pravo sodišča, pred katerim se bo začel postopek.
(20) In certain situations, such as where the applicable law makes no provision for divorce or where it does not grant one of the spouses equal access to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex , the law of the court seised should nevertheless apply.
(20) V določenih primerih, kadar pravo, ki se uporablja, bodisi ne predvideva razveze ali prenehanja registriranega partnerstva, bodisi enemu od zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev zaradi razlogov, ki jih člen 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah prepoveduje, ne daje enakih možnosti za razvezo ali prenehanje registriranega partnerstva , se uporablja pravo sodišča, pred katerim se bo začel postopek.
(20) In certain situations, such as where the applicable law makes no provision for divorce or legal separation or for the dissolution of a registered partnership, or where it does not grant one of the spouses /registered partners equal access to divorce or legal separation , or dissolution of a registered partnership on grounds prohibited by Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union , the law of the court seised should nevertheless apply.
(22a) Izraz „običajno prebivališče“ je treba opredeliti v skladu s cilji te uredbe.
(22a) The term ‘habitual residence’ should be interpreted in line with the purpose of this Regulation.
Pomen mora glede na dejstva določiti sodnik za vsak primer posebej.
Its meaning should be determined by the judge in each individual case and on the basis of the facts.
Izraz se ne nanaša na pojmovanje v nacionalnem pravu, ampak je samostojen pojem v pravu Unije.
The term does not refer to a concept of national law but, rather, to a separate concept established in Union law.
Ta uredba se uporablja v primerih, ki vsebujejo kolizijska pravila pri razvezi in prenehanju življenjske skupnosti.
This Regulation shall apply, in situations involving a conflict of laws, to divorce and legal separation.
Ta uredba se uporablja v mednarodnih primerih, ki vsebujejo kolizijska pravila pri razvezi , prenehanju življenjske skupnosti , razveljavitvi zakonske zveze ali prenehanju registriranega partnerstva .
This Regulation shall apply, in international situations involving a conflict of laws, to divorce , legal separation , annulment of marriage or the dissolution of registered partnerships .
Člen 3 – odstavek 1 – uvodni del
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
Zakonca se lahko sporazumno dogovorita o pravu, ki se uporablja pri razvezi in prenehanju življenjske skupnosti, pod pogojem da je to pravo skladno s temeljnimi pravicami iz pogodb in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah ter z načelom javnega reda, izbereta pa lahko:
The spouses may choose by mutual agreement the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, provided that such law is in conformity with the fundamental rights defined in the Treaties and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and with the principle of public policy, from among the following laws:
Zakonca ali registrirana partnerja se lahko sporazumno dogovorita o pravu, ki se uporablja pri razvezi in prenehanju življenjske skupnosti ali prenehanju registriranega partnerstva , pod pogojem da je to pravo skladno s temeljnimi pravicami iz pogodb in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah ter z načelom javnega reda, izbereta pa lahko:
The spouses or registered partners may choose by mutual agreement the law applicable to divorce and legal separation or to the dissolution of a registered partnership , provided that such law is in conformity with the fundamental rights defined in the Treaties and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and with the principle of public policy, from among the following laws:
b) pravo države zadnjega običajnega prebivališča zakoncev, če ob sklenitvi dogovora eden od njiju tam še vedno prebiva,
b) the law of the State of the spouses' last habitual residence if one of them still lives there at the time of conclusion of the agreement;
(b) pravo države zadnjega običajnega prebivališča zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev , če ob sklenitvi dogovora eden od njiju tam še vedno prebiva pod pogojem, da uporaba tega prava ne škodi šibkejšemu zakoncu ali partnerju ,
(b) the law of the State of the spouses' /registered partners ' last habitual residence if one of them still lives there at the time of conclusion of the agreement , provided that the application of that law does not penalise the weaker spouse or partner ;
(d) pravo sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek .
(d) the lex fori.
(d) pravo države članice, v kateri je bila sklenjena zakonska zveza ali je bilo registrirano partnerstvo .
(d) the law of the State in which the marriage or registered partnership took place .
Vključitev tega merila za izbiro prava, ki se uporablja, in črtanje prava sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek, se zdi logična.
It seems rational that this criterion should be included with the others for the purpose of choosing the applicable law and that the lex fori criteria should be withdrawn to better protect the weaker party.
1a. „Običajno prebivališče“ pomeni kraj, kjer oseba običajno prebiva.
The term ‘habitual residence’ shall mean a person’s ordinary place of abode.
Treba je opredeliti pojem „običajno prebivališče“, da bi se v čim večji meri izognili morebitnim samovoljnim razlagam.
A definition of the term habitual residence should be provided so as to avoid as much as possible arbitrary interpretations.
Seveda pa mora sodišče pred uporabo te opredelitve preučiti vsa ustrezna dejstva.
The court, of course, has to examine all relevant facts before it applies the definition.
Brez poseganja v odstavek 4 se sme dogovor o pravu, ki se uporablja, skleniti in spremeniti kadar koli, najpozneje pa ob začetku postopka pred sodiščem.
Without prejudice to paragraph 4, an agreement designating the applicable law may be concluded and modified at any time, but at the latest when the court is seised.
V sporazumu je treba upoštevati možnost uporabe mediacije za reševanje vseh nestrinjanj glede razveze ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti.
The agreement must consider the option of recourse to mediation in order to settle any disagreements concerning the divorce or separation.
Člen 3 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 2
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Če imata zakonca običajno prebivališče v različnih udeleženih državah članicah in pravo teh držav članic določa različne formalne pogoje, je dogovor pravno veljaven, če izpolnjuje pogoje po enem ali drugem pravu.
If the spouses are habitually resident in different participating Member States and the laws of those Member States provide for different formal requirements, the agreement shall be formally valid if it satisfies the requirements of either of those laws.
Vendar, če določa pravo udeležene države članice, v kateri imata zakonca ali registrirana partnerja ob sklenitvi dogovora običajno prebivališče, dodatne formalne pogoje za takšne dogovore, je treba te pogoje izpolniti.
However, if the law of the participating Member State in which the two spouses /registered partners have their habitual residence at the time of conclusion of the agreement lays down additional formal requirements for this type of agreement, those requirements shall apply.
Če imata zakonca ali registrirana partnerja običajno prebivališče v različnih udeleženih državah članicah in pravo teh držav članic določa različne formalne pogoje, je dogovor pravno veljaven, če izpolnjuje pogoje po enem ali drugem pravu.
If the spouses /registered partners are habitually resident in different participating Member States and the laws of those Member States provide for different formal requirements, the agreement shall be formally valid if it satisfies the requirements of either of those laws.
S tem se razjasnijo položaji, v katerih nacionalno pravo ali pogodba o zakonski zvezi predvidevata predporočno pogodbo.
This provides clarification in situations in which the law of a Member State or the marriage contract stipulates a marriage contract.
Če tako določa pravo sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek, lahko zakonca ali registrirana partnerja pravo, ki se uporablja na sodišču, določita tudi med postopkom.
If the lex fori so provides, the spouses /registered partners may also designate the law applicable before the court during the course of the proceeding.
Člen 4 – uvodni del
Article 4 – introductory wording
Če zakonca v skladu s členom 3 nimata možnosti izbire, se za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti uporabi pravo države:
In the absence of a choice pursuant to Article 3, divorce and legal separation shall be subject to the law of the State:
Če zakonca v skladu s členom 3 nimata možnosti izbire, se za razvezo , prenehanje življenjske skupnosti , razveljavitev zakonske zveze in prenehanje registriranega partnerstva (v padajočem vrstnem redu) uporabi pravo države:
In the absence of a choice pursuant to Article 3, divorce and legal separation , annulment of marriage and the dissolution of a registered partnership shall be subject , in descending order, to the law of the State:
(a) običajnega prebivališča zakoncev ob začetku postopka pred sodiščem ali, če to ni mogoče,
(a) where the spouses are habitually resident at the time the court is seised; or, failing that,
(a) običajnega prebivališča zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev ob začetku postopka pred sodiščem ali, če to ni mogoče,
(a) where the spouses /registered partners are habitually resident at the time the court is seised; or, failing that,
(b) zadnjega običajnega prebivališča zakoncev, pod pogojem da tam nista nehala prebivati več kot eno leto pred začetkom postopka, kadar eden od njiju ob začetku postopka pred sodiščem v tej državi še vedno prebiva, ali, če to ni mogoče,
(b) where the spouses were last habitually resident, provided that the period of residence did not end more than one year before the court was seised, in so far as one of the spouses still resides in that State at the time the court is seised; or, failing that,
(b) zadnjega običajnega prebivališča zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev , pod pogojem da tam nista nehala prebivati več kot eno leto pred začetkom postopka, kadar eden od njiju ob začetku postopka pred sodiščem v tej državi še vedno prebiva, ali, če to ni mogoče,
(b) where the spouses /registered partners were last habitually resident, provided that the period of residence did not end more than one year before the court was seised, in so far as one of the spouses or partners still resides in that State at the time the court is seised; or, failing that,
c) katere državljana sta zakonca ob začetku postopka pred sodiščem, ali, če to ni mogoče,
c) of which both spouses are nationals at the time the court is seised; or, failing that,
(c) katere državljana sta zakonca ali registrirana partnerja ob začetku postopka pred sodiščem pod pogojem, da uporaba tega prava ne škodi šibkejšemu zakoncu ali partnerju, ali, če to ni mogoče,
(c) of which both spouses / registered partners are nationals at the time the court is seised, provided that the application of that law does not penalise the weaker spouse or partner ; or, failing that,
(ca) v kateri je bila sklenjena zakonska zveza ali je bilo registrirano partnerstvo ali, če to ni mogoče,
(ca) in which the mar ria ge or registered partnership took place; or, failing that,
Iz izbire kraja, kjer sta se partnerja poročila, je možno smiselno sklepati, da sta partnerja privolila tudi v pravne predpise te države.
The choice by the parties of a country to celebrate their marriage should be reasonably presumed as implying possible acceptance of the law of that country as well.
„Običajno prebivališče“ pomeni kraj, kjer oseba običajno prebiva.
The term ‘habitual residence’ shall mean a person’s ordinary place of abode.
Uporaba prava sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek
Application of the lex fori
Uporaba načel prava sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek in forum necessitatis
Application of the principles of lex fori and of forum necessitatis
Kadar pravo, ki se uporablja v skladu s členoma 3 in 4, bodisi ne predvideva razveze bodisi enemu od zakoncev zaradi spola ne daje enakih možnosti za razvezo ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti , se uporablja pravo sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek.
Where the law applicable pursuant to Article 3 or Article 4 makes no provision for divorce or does not grant one of the spouses equal access to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex , the lex fori shall apply.
Kadar pravo, ki se uporablja v skladu s členoma 3 in 4, bodisi ne predvideva razveze , prenehanja življenjske zveze ali registriranega partnerstva ali možnosti za razvezo, prenehanje življenjske skupnosti ali registriranega partnerstva, diskriminira enega od zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev zaradi razlogov, ki jih člen 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah prepoveduje, se uporablja pravo sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek.
Where the law applicable pursuant to Article 3 or Article 4 makes no provision for divorce or legal separation or dissolution of a registered partnership, or the access to divorce or legal separation or dissolution of a registered partnership, is discriminatory as regards one of the spouses or registered partners on grounds prohibited by Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union , the lex fori shall apply.
Ko je pristojno sodišče v državi članici, katere pravo ne predvideva razveze ali prenehanja življenjske zveze ali registriranega partnerstva, se pristojnost preseli v
Where the court of competent jurisdiction is located in a Member State whose law does not provide for divorce or legal separation, or dissolution of a registered partnership, jurisdiction shall be conferred on:
(a) državo članico državljanstva enega od zakoncev ali registriranih partnerjev, ali
(a) the Member State of which one of the spouses or partners is a national; or
(b) državo članico, v kateri je bila sklenjena zakonska zveza ali je bilo registrirano partnerstvo.
(b) the Member State in which the marriage or registered partnership took place.
V nekaterih primerih je uporaba določenega nacionalnega prava lahko težava za osebe, ki prebivajo v neki državi članici in se želijo razvezati ali prenehati življenjsko skupnost.
In some cases, the application of a national law could be an obstacle to certain persons resident in a Member State who seek a separation or divorce.
Interes posameznika za pridobitev razveze ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti kot izraz osebne avtonomije bi moral imeti prednost pred uporabo nacionalnega prava z načelom uporabe prava sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek.
Therefore, the interest of the individuals in obtaining a separation or divorce as an expression of personal autonomy should have priority over the application of national law by applying the lex fori principle.
Če pravo pristojnega sodišča ne omogoča ločitve ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti, se lahko pooblasti sodišče v drugi državi članici, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjene nekatere zahteve o čezmejnih primerih.
If the law of the competent court does not allow divorce or legal separation, jurisdiction could be granted to a court of another Member State if certain conditions relating to some transborder cases are fulfilled.