natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4. poudarja, da so ključne spodbujevalne tehnologije strateškega pomena za inovacije na področju procesov, blaga in storitev ter za prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo, ki temelji na znanju; podpira smernice za razvoj okvirja industrijske politike za ključne spodbujevalne tehnologije, ki jih je Komisija predstavila v sporočilu KOM(2009)0512 , ter se pridružuje zahtevi, ki jo je Komisija naslovila na države članice, naj se sporazumejo o pomenu uporabe ključnih spodbujevalnih tehnologij v EU;
Emphasises the strategic importance of key enabling technologies for innovation in relation to processes, goods and services and the transition to a knowledge-based, low-carbon economy; endorses the guidelines for the development of an industrial policy framework for key enabling technologies put forward by the Commission in its communication COM(2009)0512 , and joins the Commission in calling on the Member States to reach agreement on the importance of using key enabling technologies in the EU;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj razvije nove inovacijske kazalnike, ki bodo zajemali tudi netehnološke vidike, bolj primerne za storitvena, vedno bolj na znanju temelječa gospodarstva;
Calls on the Commission to develop new innovations indicators, including non-technological aspects, which are better suited for increasingly knowledge-based service economies;
8. poudarja, da je inovacija v prvi vrsti novost, ki se odziva na potrebe potrošnikov in trga; zato poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi večje priznanje primarnosti povpraševanja potrošnikov kot gonilne sile inovacij;
Stresses that innovation is first and foremost a novelty that addresses consumers’ and market needs; asks the Commission, therefore, to ensure better recognition of the primacy of consumers’ demands as a driving force for innovation;
11. poudarja, da morajo komisarji, ki so vključeni v inovacijsko politiko in z njo povezana področja, bolj uskladiti svoje delo ter da bi se morala s tem zmanjšati razdrobljenost instrumentov EU na področju politike inovacij.
Stresses the need for enhanced coordination of the work of the Commissioners involved in innovation policy and related fields, and urges that this should lead to less fragmented EU instruments in the field of innovation policy;
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Gianni Pittella, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Catherine Stihler, Róża grofica Von Thun Und Hohenstein, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Bernadette Vergnaud
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Gianni Pittella, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Catherine Stihler, Róża Gräfin Von Thun Und Hohenstein, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Bernadette Vergnaud
Jean-Pierre Audy, Zigmantas Balčytis, Bendt Bendtsen, Jan Březina, Reinhard Bütikofer, Maria Da Graça Carvalho, Giles Chichester, Christian Ehler, Lena Ek, Ioan Enciu, Gaston Franco, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, Fiona Hall, Jacky Hénin, Sajjad Karim, Arturs Krišjānis Kariņš, Philippe Lamberts, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Angelika Niebler, Jaroslav Paška, Aldo Patriciello, Ani Podemata (Anni Podimata), Miloslav Ransdorf, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Jens Rohde, Paul Rübig, Amalia Sartori, Francisco Sosa Wagner, Konrad Szymański, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Evžen Tošenovský, Niki Tzavela, Marita Ulvskog, Vladimir Uručev (Vladimir Urutchev), Adina-Ioana Vălean, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Jean-Pierre Audy, Zigmantas Balčytis, Bendt Bendtsen, Jan Březina, Reinhard Bütikofer, Maria Da Graça Carvalho, Giles Chichester, Christian Ehler, Lena Ek, Ioan Enciu, Gaston Franco, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, Fiona Hall, Jacky Hénin, Sajjad Karim, Arturs Krišjānis Kariņš, Philippe Lamberts, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Angelika Niebler, Jaroslav Paška, Aldo Patriciello, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Jens Rohde, Paul Rübig, Amalia Sartori, Francisco Sosa Wagner, Konrad Szymański, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Evžen Tošenovský, Niki Tzavela, Marita Ulvskog, Vladimir Urutchev, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Matthias Groote, Rebecca Harms, Oriol Junqueras Vies, Ivailo Kalfin, Ivari Padar, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Mario Pirillo, Vladimír Remek, Frédérique Ries, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Hermann Winkler
Matthias Groote, Rebecca Harms, Oriol Junqueras Vies, Ivailo Kalfin, Ivari Padar, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Mario Pirillo, Vladimír Remek, Frédérique Ries, Theodoros Skylakakis, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Hermann Winkler
o institucionalnih vidikih pristopa Evropske unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin
on the institutional aspects of the accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Poročevalec: Ramón Jáuregui Atondo
Rapporteur: Ramón Jáuregui Atondo
Kinga Gál , Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve
Kinga Gál , Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 11
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (*) 11
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – člen 50 poslovnika
(*) Associated committee – Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
– ob upoštevanju člena 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, členov 216(2), 218(6), 218(8) in 218(10) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in protokola o členu 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji o pristopu Unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (v nadaljevanju EKČP);
– having regard to Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, Articles 216(2), 218(6), 218(8) and 218(10) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Protocol on Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union concerning the accession of the Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereafter referred to as the ECHR),
– ob upoštevanju sklepa konference predsednikov z dne 14. januarja 2010, s katero je odobril uporabo člena 50 poslovnika (postopek s pridruženimi odbori)
– having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 14 January 2010 authorising the application of Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure (procedure with associated committees)
Zapisnik seje konference predsednikov, PE 432.390/CPG, točka 9.1. ,
Minutes of the meeting of the Conference of Presidents, PE432.390/CPG, point 9.1 ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za civilne svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0144/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0144/2010 ),
A. ker Sodišče Evropske unije v svoji sodni praksi že od sodb v zadevah 11–70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH [1970] ECR
A. whereas, in case law which has remained consistent since the judgments in Case 11-70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH [1970] ECR
Sodna praksa 1970, str.
ECR 1970, p.1125 and in Case 4-73 Nold [1974] ECR
1125. in 4–73 Nold [1974] ECR ugotavlja, da tvorijo temeljne pravice bistveni del splošnih načel prava, ki jih Sodišče ščiti,
ECR 1974, p.491 , the Court of Justice of the European Union has held that fundamental rights form an integral part of the general legal principles which the Court enforces,
B. ker se Sodišče Evropske unije pri tem opira na skupne ustavne tradicije držav članic in na mednarodne instrumente za zaščito človekovih pravic, h katerim morajo države članice pristopiti, kot na primer EKČP;
B. whereas in so doing the Court of Justice of the European Union draws its inspiration from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States and from international instruments concerning the protection of human rights to which the Member States have acceded, such as the ECHR,
C. ker je bilo bistvo te sodne prakse s Pogodbo o Evropski uniji iz Maastrichta leta 1993 vključeno v primarno zakonodajo,
C. whereas the essence of this case law was incorporated into primary law by the Maastricht Treaty on European Union of 1993,
D. ker Sodišče Evropske unije namenja posebno pozornost razvoju sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, o čemer priča vse večje število sodb, ki se sklicujejo na določbe EKČP,
D. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union devotes particular attention to the development of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, as demonstrated by the growing number of judgments which refer to provisions of the ECHR,
E. ker Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice načeloma domneva, da je ravnanje države članice skladno z EKČP, kadar ta država le izvaja pravo Unije,
E. whereas in principle the European Court of Human Rights makes a ‘presumption of compatibility’ of the conduct of a Member State of the Union with the ECHR when the State is merely implementing Union law,
F. ker je Sodišče Evropske unije v mnenju z dne 28. marca 1996 ugotovilo, da Evropska skupnost ne more pristopiti k EKČP, dokler ne bo spremenjena pogodba in ne bo EU imela eksplicitno ali implicitno pristojnost, da to stori,
F. whereas, in an opinion of 28 March 1996, the Court of Justice of the European Union found that the European Community could not accede to the ECHR without a previous amendment to the Treaty because the Community did not have an explicit or implicit competence to do so,
G. ker je treba pri pristopu spoštovati omejitve, ki jih postavlja Lizbonska pogodba in k njej priloženi protokoli, še zlasti člen 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in protokol št. 8 k Lizbonski pogodbi; ker te določbe Uniji ne le omogočajo pristop, temveč institucije Unije k temu obvezujejo, ob upoštevanju, da mora sporazum o pristopu Unije k EKČP odražati, da je treba ohraniti posebne značilnosti Unije in njene zakonodaje,
G. whereas the limits set by the Lisbon Treaty and the Protocols thereto must be upheld at the time of accession and, more specifically, Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and Protocol No 8 to the Lisbon Treaty; whereas these provisions do not merely constitute an option allowing the Union to accede but require the Union institutions to act accordingly, and whereas the agreement on the accession of the Union to the ECHR must reflect the need to retain the specific features of the Union and of Union law,
H. ker lahko Unija po sklenitvi protokola št. 14 o spremembi EKČP k tej pristopi, kar zadeva države podpisnice EKČP, o pogojih in načinih pristopa pa se morajo dogovoriti Unija na eni strani in države podpisnice EKČP na drugi;
H. whereas, due to the conclusion of Protocol No 14 amending the ECHR, it is now possible for the Union to accede on behalf of the signatory states to the ECHR and whereas the accession terms and conditions must be agreed at the time of accession between the Union, of the one part, and the signatory states to the ECHR of the other part,
I. ker bi moral takšen dogovor obravnavati tudi administrativna in tehnična vprašanja, kot je načelo o prispevku Unije k pokrivanju stroškov delovanja Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, ker je treba v tem okviru predvideti vzpostavitev samostojnega proračuna Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, da se olajša ocenjevanje posameznih prispevkov,
I. whereas such an agreement should also deal with administrative and technical issues, such as the principle of a contribution from the Union to the operating costs of the European Court of Human Rights; whereas in that context plans should be made to establish an autonomous budget for the European Court of Human Rights to facilitate assessment of the various contributions,
J. ker bi bila Unija s pristopom k EKČP vključena v njen sistem varovanja temeljnih pravic in bi imela poleg notranje zaščite teh pravic s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije na voljo tudi zunanji organ za zunanjo zaščito, ki je mednarodnega značaja,
J. whereas, as a result of acceding to the ECHR, the Union will be integrated into its fundamental rights protection system and, in addition to the internal protection of these rights by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, will have the benefit of an external protection body which is international in character,
K. ker EKČP ni bila razvita le z dodatnimi protokoli, temveč tudi z uporabo drugih konvencij, listin in sporazumov, s katerimi se je vzpostavil sistem varovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ki se stalno razvija,
K. whereas the ECHR has been developed not only through the additional Protocols, but also through other Conventions, Charters and Agreements, resulting into a continuously evolving system of protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
– pristop predstavlja napredek v procesu evropskega povezovanja in hkrati korak naprej k uresničitvi politične Unije,
– accession constitutes a move forward in the process of European integration and involves one further step towards political Union
– medtem ko je Unija svoj sistem zaščite temeljnih pravic dokončno oblikovala in okrepila z vključitvijo Listine o temeljnih pravicah v svojo primarno zakonodajo, pa bi bil njen pristop k EKČP vidno znamenje njene povezanosti z državami, ki so članice Sveta Evrope, in z njegovim vseevropskim sistemom na področju človekovih pravic; ta pristop bi okrepil tudi verodostojnost Unije v njenem odnosu do tretjih držav, ki jih na dvostranski ravni vedno poziva k spoštovanju EKČP,
– while the Union's system for the protection of fundamental rights will be supplemented and enhanced by the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into its primary law, its accession to the ECHR will send a strong signal concerning the coherence between the Union and the countries belonging to the Council of Europe and its pan-European human rights system; this accession will also enhance the credibility of the Union in the eyes of third countries which it regularly calls upon in its bilateral reports to respect the ECHR,
– uskladitev pravnih redov Unije in EKČP na področju človekovih pravic v zakonodaji in sodni praksi bo prispevala k skladnemu razvoju dveh evropskih sodišč na področju človekovih pravic, še zlasti ker bosta dialog in sodelovanje postala še bolj potrebna, ter se bo tako vzpostavil celovit sistem, v katerem bosta sodišči usklajeno delovali,
– legislative and case law harmonisation in the field of human rights of the rule of law of the EU and the ECHR will contribute to the harmonious development of the two European courts in the field of human rights, particularly because of the increased need for dialogue and cooperation, and thus will create an integral system, in which the two courts will function in synchrony,
– pristop bo do neke mere tudi nadomestilo za to, da je pristojnost Sodišča Evropske unije v zadevah s področja zunanje in varnostne politike ter policijskega sodelovanja in varnostne politike nekoliko omejena, saj bo zagotovil koristen zunanji sodni nadzor nad vsemi dejavnostmi EU,
– accession will also compensate to some extent for the fact that the scope of the Court of Justice of the European Union is somewhat constrained in the matters of foreign and security policy and police and security policy by providing useful external judicial supervision of all EU activities,
2. opozarja, da skladno s členom 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in protokolom št. 8 pristop ne prinaša razširitve pristojnosti Unije, ne uvaja njene splošne pristojnosti na področju človekovih pravic ter ne vpliva na pristojnosti institucij Unije, in da je v skladu s členoma 4(2) in 6(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji treba ohranjati spoštovanje ustavne tradicije in identitete držav članic;
Recalls that, pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and Protocol No 8, accession does not entail any extension of the powers of the Union and in particular does not create a general human rights competence for the Union, and that, pursuant to Article 4(2) and Article 6(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the Member States’ traditions and constitutional identities must be respected;
4. ugotavlja, da je bil sistem EKČP dopolnjen z nizom dodatnih protokolov v zvezi z varovanjem pravic, ki niso predmet EKČP, in priporoča, da se Komisiji podeli mandat za pogajanje o pristopu k vsem protokolom, ki se nanašajo na pravice, ki se ujemajo z Listino o temeljnih pravicah (št. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 in 13), in to neodvisno od njihove ratifikacije s strani držav članic Unije;
Observes that the ECHR system has been supplemented by a series of additional protocols concerning the protection of rights which are not covered by the ECHR and recommends that the Commission be mandated also to negotiate accession to all the protocols concerning rights corresponding to the Charter of Fundamental Rights (1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13), regardless of whether they have been ratified by the Member States of the Union;
7. poudarja, da Unija s pristopom k EKČP ne postaja članica Sveta Evrope, vendar je njena udeležba pri organih konvencije v določeni meri potrebna, da bi zagotovili njeno uspešno vključitev v sistem EKČP in da bi Unija s tem pridobila določene pravice, še zlasti:
Stresses that accession to the ECHR does not make the Union a member of the Council of Europe but that a degree of participation by the Union in the ECHR bodies is necessary in order to ensure proper integration of the Union into the ECHR system and that, therefore, the Union should have certain rights in this domain, particularly:
– pravico do predložitve seznama treh kandidatov za mesto sodnika, izmed katerih enega kot predstavnika Unije izvoli parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope; ta sodnik ima v skladu s členom 27(2) EKČP pri delu Sodišča enakopravno vlogo kot drugi sodniki; Evropski parlament se vključi bodisi v pripravo seznama kandidatov, skladno s podobnim postopkom, kot ga predvideva člen 255 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za kandidate za sodnike Sodišča EU, bodisi v postopek, podoben predstavitvam kandidatov za komisarje Evropske komisije,
– the right to submit a list of three candidates for the post of judge, one of whom is elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on behalf of the Union and participates in the work of the Court on a footing of equality with the other judges, pursuant to Article 27(2) of the ECHR; the European Parliament being involved either in drawing up the list of candidates in line with a procedure similar to that provided for in Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for candidates for the position of judge at the Court of Justice of the European Union, or under a procedure similar to the hearings of candidates-designate of the European Commission,
– pravico, da se z volilno pravico v imenu Evropske unije prek Evropske komisije udeležuje sej Odbora ministrov, kadar ta opravlja funkcijo organa za nadzor nad izvrševanjem sodb Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ali kadar odloča o primernosti naslovitve prošnje za mnenje na Sodišče, ter da je zastopana v Odboru direktorjev za človekove pravice (podorgan Odbora ministrov),
– the right to attend via the European Commission, with voting rights on behalf of the EU, meetings of the Committee of Ministers when it performs its task of monitoring the execution of judgments given by the European Court of Human Rights or when it decides on the desirability of seeking an opinion from the Court and the right to be represented on the Steering Committee for Human Rights (a subsidiary body of the Committee of Ministers),
– pravico Evropskega parlamenta, da imenuje/pošlje določeno število svojih predstavnikov v generalno skupščino Sveta Evrope, kadar ta voli sodnike Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice;
– the right of the European Parliament to appoint/send a certain number of representatives to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe when the latter elects judges to the European Court of Human Rights;
11. ugotavlja, da se po pristopu EU k EKČP lahko zgodi, da bosta za določene zadeve pristojni obe sodišči, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice in Sodišče Evropske unije, ter poudarja, da se ni dopustno, da bi se takšna zadeva hkrati predložila obema sodiščema;
Notes that, following the EU’s accession to the ECHR, it might occur that both the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union have jurisdiction in certain cases, and points out that simultaneous referrals to the two Courts will not be admissible;
13. ocenjuje, da sprejetje statusa sotožene stranke ne preprečuje drugih posrednih možnosti, ki jih ponuja EKČP (člen 36, I), kot je na primer pravica Unije, da v vsaki pritožbi državljana Unije nastopi kot tretja stranka;
Considers that the adoption of the institution of co-defendant does not impede other indirect options provided by the ECHR (Article 36, I), such as the right of the Union to intervene as a third party in any application by an EU citizen;
16. se jasno zaveda dejstva, da lahko Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice ugotovi kršitev v zadevi, o kateri je Sodišče Evropske unije že odločilo, in poudarja, da to nikakor ne bo zbudilo dvomov v verodostojnosti Sodišča Evropske unije kot najvišjega razsodnika v pravosodnem sistemu EU;
Is clearly aware of the fact that the European Court of Human Rights may find a violation in a case that has already been decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union and stresses that this would in no way cast a doubt on the credibility of the Court of Justice of the European Union as an ultimate umpire in the EU judicial system;
18. opozarja, da je spodbujanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic, ki je kot temeljno načelo EU vključeno v ustanovno pogodbo, skupni temelj njenih odnosov s tretjimi državami; zato meni, da se bo s pristopom dodatno okrepilo zaupanje državljanov v Evropsko unijo in povečala verodostojnost EU v pogovorih o človekovih pravicah z državami nečlanicami; prav tako poudarja, da je za zagotovitev verodostojnosti v teh pogovorih v enaki meri pomembno tudi enotno in popolno izvajanje Listine o temeljnih pravicah na ravni EU;
Recalls that promotion of respect of human rights, a core value of the EU as enshrined in its founding treaty, constitutes common ground for its relations with third countries; takes the view, therefore, that accession will further enhance the confidence of citizens in the European Union and the EU’s credibility in talks on human rights with non-member States; stresses, furthermore, that the uniform and full application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights at EU level is equally essential to ensure the Union’s credibility in this dialogue: