natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Velja lahko za plinske elektrarne, lahko pa pripomore tudi k preprečevanju emisij iz večjih industrijskih kompleksov.
It can be applied to gas-fired power stations and can help to avoid emissions from major industrial complexes.
Skupaj z uporabo biomase v elektrarnah lahko pripomore k doseganju neto negativne proizvodnje emisij in tako dopolnjuje obnovljive vire energije.
Combined with the use of biomass in power stations it can help achieve net negative emissions, complementing renewable energy.
Prednostna naloga pa mora biti reševanje problema premoga.
But the priority must be to use it to deal with the problem of coal.
Premog je odgovoren za 24 % izpustov CO 2 v Evropi, vendar ta številka zbledi v primerjavi s stanjem drugod po svetu.
Coal is responsible for 24% of Europe's CO2 emissions, yet these fade into insignificance compared with the quantities generated elsewhere.
V ZDA s premogom proizvedejo 50 % svoje električne energije, v Indiji 70 %, na Kitajskem pa kar 80 %.
The USA uses coal to generate 50% of its electricity, in India the figure is 70% and in China it is 80%.
Samo v teh treh državah načrtujejo gradnjo okoli 850 novih in nadomestnih elektrarn na premog.
Some 850 new and replacement coal fired power stations are planned in these three countries alone.
Ob hitri rasti povpraševanja Mednarodna agencija za energijo ocenjuje, da bo svetovna uporaba premoga do leta 2030 narasla za 70 %, in to upoštevajoč vse ukrepe za spodbujanje proizvodnje električne energije iz obnovljivih virov in za zmanjšanje energetske porabe.
With demand growing fast the International Energy Agency predicts a 70% increase in the world-wide use of coal by 2030, and this is in addition to all that will be done to promote electricity generation from renewable sources and to cut energy use.
Pomena širjenja uporabe CCS v Evropi ne smemo podcenjevati.
The importance of developing the use of CCS in Europe cannot be underestimated.
Če izkoristimo vse možnosti uporabe CCS, bi lahko do leta 2050 zagotovili znižanje naših izpustov CO 2 za 50 %.
Deployed to its full potential it could secure a 50% reduction in our CO2 emissions by 2050.
Omejitve, ki jih sektorju proizvodnje energije predpisuje sistem trgovanja z emisijami, bodo odigrale pomembno vlogo pri zagotavljanju dejanskega zmanjšanja emisij CO 2 , saj bo cena za nakup pravic odvračala od gradnje elektrarn na premog brez CCS, vendar je izjemno pomembno predvsem stanje v svetu.
The cap imposed on the power sector by the emissions trading system will play the major role in ensuring that CO2 reductions take place, with the price of allowances discouraging the construction of coal-fired power plants not CCS equipped, but it is the global picture that is so important.
Edini namen te tehnologije je preprečevanje izpusta emisij CO 2 v ozračje v okviru boja proti svetovnem segrevanju.
Their sole purpose is to prevent the release of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere to help the fight against global warming.
Če Evropska unija ne bo dala zgleda s spodbujanjem hitrega razvoja tehnologije, ne bo nobenega upanja, da bi prepričali Indijo in Kitajsko, naj začneta uporabljati to tehnologijo, oziroma da ju prepričali, da bi moral prihodnji mednarodni sporazum o reševanju spremembe podnebja zahtevati uporabo te tehnologije.
If the European Union does not set an example by encouraging rapid development of the technology there will be no hope of persuading India and China to adopt its use or to persuade these countries that it should be a requirement of a future international agreement on tackling climate change.
Z vsakim letom zamude se bodo ogromne količine CO 2 , ki jih proizvaja vedno več elektrarn na premog, še povečale, plin pa bo v ozračju ostal še mnogo desetletij.
The enormous output of CO2 from the growing number of coal-fired power stations will increase with every year of delay, and the gas will remain in the atmosphere for many, many decades to come.
Treba je odgovoriti na legitimne pomisleke javnosti glede uporabe tehnologije CCS, vendar je na njih treba gledati v širšem okviru.
Legitimate public concerns about the use of CCS technology must be addressed but must also be placed in context.
Nekateri menijo, da transport in shranjevanje inertnega CO 2 predstavlja tveganje, vendar se ne more primerjati s transportom in shranjevanjem metana po vsej Evropi, ki je popolnoma rutinski.
Fears have been expressed that the transport and storage of inert CO2 presents a danger, but it hardly compares to the transport and storage of methane that takes place across Europe as a matter of routine.
Ta strupeni, vnetljivi in eksplozivni toplogredni plin je shranjen na ducatih podzemnih lokacij ter je speljan po ceveh v milijone domov – kjer se celo kuri!
This toxic, inflammable and explosive greenhouse gas is not only stored in scores of underground locations but is even piped into millions of homes - where it is set alight!
Tehnologija zajemanja CO 2 je še vedno dokaj nezrela.
CO2 capture technology is still relatively immature.
Treba je razviti nove tehnologije, obstoječe pa izboljšati, da bodo zadostile potrebam velikih kurilnih naprav.
New techniques must be developed and existing ones scaled up to meet the demands of a large combustion plant.
Vseeno pa kaže, da je mogoče te ovire hitro premagati, opogumljajoče pa je tudi, da je Alstom maja 2008 postal prvi večji proizvajalec, ki je izjavil, da bodo elektrarne, opremljene s tehnologijo CCS, dostopne na trgu po letu 2015, pod pogojem, da se bo kmalu začelo delo na predlaganih predstavitvenih projektih, ki nam bodo omogočali učenje prek gradnje, preizkušanje tehnologij in zmanjševanje stroškov.
Yet the indications are that these obstacles can quickly be overcome and it is encouraging that Alstom, in May 2008, became the first major manufacturer to state that CCS-equipped generating plants would be commercially available from 2015 so long as work commences shortly on the proposed demonstration projects that will help us learn-by-doing, testing technologies and reducing costs.
Nekatere skrbi, da CO 2 ni mogoče varno shraniti globoko pod zemljo, temveč bo uhajal v ozračje, kjer bo predstavljal nekakšno grožnjo zdravju ter tako izničil namen, zaradi katerega je bil sploh shranjen.
There are worries that CO2 cannot be securely stored deep underground but that it might leak, escaping into the atmosphere to present a health danger of some kind and negating the very purpose for which it was stored in the first place.
Ogljikov dioksid je naravna sestavina zraka, ki ga dihamo, in le izjemno visoke koncentracije na specifični lokaciji bi morda lahko povzročile težave.
Carbon dioxide is a natural component of the air we breathe and only very intense concentrations at a particular location are ever likely to cause a problem.
IPCC predvideva, da stopnja uhajanja ne bo presegala 1 odstotka na vsakih 1000 let, kar je štirikrat daljše obdobje od celotne zgodovine industrijske civilizacije.
The IPCC envisages leakage rates of no more than 1 per cent every 1,000 years, a period four times longer than the entire history of industrial civilisation.
Vseeno pa je po mnenju poročevalca vsakršno uhajanje, za katerega se lahko predvideva, da bo imelo negativen učinek na človeško zdravje ali okolje, nesprejemljivo.
Nonetheless, in the opinion of the Rapporteur, any leakage that can be anticipated to have a negative impact on human health or the environment is unacceptable.
Reševanja tega problema ne bi smeli naprtiti prihodnjim generacijam.
This should not be a problem we are passing to future generations unsolved.
Norveška vlada poroča, da po desetih letih vbrizgavanja na območju Sleipner pod Severnim morjem ni prišlo niti do uhajanja niti do migracije izven predvidenih omejitev.
The Norwegian Government reports that after 10 years of injection operations at Sleipner beneath the North Sea there has not only been no leakage but no migration outside the limits predicted.
CO 2 sčasoma postane bolj stabilen, verjetnost za uhajanje pa se še zmanjša.
With the passing of time stored CO2 becomes more stable and leakages even more improbable.
Poročevalec ceni nasvete in priporočila, ki jih je pri pripravi tega poročila podala vrsta družb in organizacij.
The Rapporteur appreciates the advice and recommendations given by a host of companies and organisations in preparing this report.
Zlasti se zahvaljuje Komisiji za pomoč pri pripravi predlogov sprememb za revizijo in izboljšanje osnutka zakonodaje.
In particular he thanks the Commission for its help in preparing amendments to revise, and improve, the draft legislation.
Vseeno pa ostajajo razlike glede pristopa in poročevalec prevzema izključno odgovornost za svoje sklepe in priporočila.
However, differences in approach remain and the Rapporteur accepts sole responsibility for his conclusions and recommendations.
Ko se bo upošteval prihranek pri pravicah v okviru sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami, bodo dolgoročni stroški uporabe sistemov CCS po pričakovanjih primerljivi z drugimi tehnologijami za pridobivanje električne energije, prvi akterji pa bodo plačali visoko ceno in bodo potrebovali določeno obliko javne podpore.
Long term costs of the use of CCS systems are expected to be comparable with other electricity generating technologies once the saving in EU ETS allowances is taken into account, but first movers will pay a high price and will require some form of public support.
Evropski svet je marca 2007 podprl izgradnjo do 12 velikih elektrarn za prikaz uporabe CCS do leta 2015.
In March 2007 the European Council pledged its support for construction by 2015 of up to 12 large scale CCS demonstration plants.
Upati je, da bo dodatna finančna sredstva, potrebna za uresničitev tega načrta, mogoče zagotoviti pred začetkom veljavnosti te direktive.
It is to be hoped that the additional funding necessary to bring these to fruition can be secured before the entry into force of this Directive.
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committees – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
Komisija v svojem sporočilu o omejevanju globalnih podnebnih sprememb na 2 stopinji Celzija pojasnjuje, da bo treba emisije iz razvitih držav zmanjšati za 30 % do leta 2020 in za 60–80 % do leta 2050, če hočemo doseči 50-odstotno znižanje svetovnih emisij CO2 do leta 2050.
The Commission communication on limiting global climate change to 2 degrees Celsius explains that, in order to achieve a 50% reduction in global CO2 emissions by 2050, emissions from developed countries will have be reduced by 30% by 2020 and then by 60-80% by 2050.
Da bi dosegli te cilje, moramo izrabiti vse možnosti za zmanjšanje emisij, kot so spodbude za omejevanje porabe fosilnih goriv, zamenjava fosilnih goriv z drugimi alternativnimi viri energije in zajemanje ter shranjevanje CO2 (CCS).
In order to make these objectives feasible, we need to exploit all emissions reduction options, such as: incentives to limit our fossil fuel consumption; the replacement of fossil fuels by other alternative energy sources; and CO2 capture and storage (CCS).
Shranjevanje CO2 vključuje omejevanje izpustov CO2 v ozračje z zajemom tega plina pri viru nastajanja in shranjevanjem pod zemljo, kjer ne more več vplivati na globalno segrevanje.
CO2 storage consists of restricting the emission of CO2 into the atmosphere by capturing it at its production source and storing it in the subsoil where it can no longer have an impact on global warming.
Ta rešitev bo odpravila tudi problem v zvezi z emisijami toplogrednih plinov pri viru nastajanja.
This solution has the benefit of addressing the problem of greenhouse gas emissions at source.
Vendar mora ta tehnologija izpolniti visoke standarde na področju ustrezne izbire in upravljanja objektov, da bi čim bolj zmanjšali nevarnost uhajanja.
However, the technology must meet high standards for the appropriate selection and management of sites so as to reduce the risk of leakage as far as possible.
Shranjevanje ogljika bo zlasti koristno za velike industrijske obrate, kot so elektrarne na tekoča fosilna goriva (nafta), trdna fosilna goriva (premog) in plinasta fosilna goriva (zemeljski plin), rafinerije plina, obrati za proizvodnjo gnojil ter drugi obrati, ki proizvajajo velike količine CO2.
Carbon sequestration will be useful principally for major industrial plants, such as power stations fired by liquid, solid or gaseous fossil fuels (oil, coal and natural gas respectively), gas refineries, fertiliser plants and other sites producing large quantities of CO2.
Emisije elektrarn na premog pomenijo četrtino emisij CO2 v Evropi in velik del rasti emisij v Aziji.
Emissions from coal-fired power stations account for a quarter of CO2 emissions in Europe and a large proportion of the growth in emissions in Asia.
Glede na pričakovanja, da se bo v Evropi in po vsem svetu povečalo število elektrarn na premog, obstaja veliko zanimanje za razvoj tehnologij za zajemanje in geološko shranjevanje CO2.
Given the likely proliferation of coal-fired power stations in Europe and worldwide, there is much interest in the development of technologies for the geological capture and storage of CO2.
Zdaj je treba znižati ceno te tehnologije.
What now needs to be done is to reduce the cost of this technology.
Stroški CCS na eni strani vključujejo stroške infrastrukture za zajemanje, prevoz in shranjevanje CO2, na drugi strani pa stroške obratovanja te infrastrukture za shranjevanje CO2.
The cost of CCS is made up partly of infrastructure expenses for the capture, transport and storage of CO2, and partly of the costs of operating these infrastructures for the storage of CO2.
Pri shranjevanju, prevozu in vbrizgavanju CO2 se porabi nekaj energije.
The capture, transport and injection of CO2 calls for the expenditure of a certain amount of energy.
Pri sedanjih cenah tehnologije je začetna naložba za 30 do 70 % višja kot pri „standardnih“ elektrarnah.
At its present price, the technology requires a prior investment 30-70% higher than for 'traditional' power stations.
Tudi operativni stroški so precej višji od stroškov elektrarn na premog, ki niso opremljene s tehnologijo CCS.
Operating costs, too, far exceed those of coal-fired power stations not equipped with CCS technology.
Ogljik se bo torej zajemal in shranjeval le, če bo cena tone preprečenih emisij CO2 nižja od cene ogljika.
So CCS will only be deployed if the price of a tonne of CO2 emissions avoided falls below the price of carbon.
Sistem Skupnosti za trgovanje z emisijami (EU ETS) bo glavna spodbuda za uveljavitev zajemanja in shranjevanja ogljika.
The EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), will be the main incentive to the deployment of CCS.
CO2, ki se zajame in varno shrani v skladu s pravnim okvirom Evropske unije, v sistemu Skupnosti za trgovanje z emisijami ne bo obravnavan kot izpust.
Under the EU ETS, CO2 captured and stored under proper security conditions in accordance with the legal framework laid down by the EU will be deemed not to have been emitted.
Glede na to, da se CCS predvideva v sistemu Skupnosti za trgovanje z emisijami, in na podlagi predpostavke, da se bodo emisije toplogrednih plinov do leta 2020 zmanjšale za 20 %, bi se po ocenah, ki so bile opravljene za oceno učinka predlagane direktive, lahko leta 2020 shranilo 7 milijonov ton CO2, leta 2030 pa do 160 milijonov ton.
According to estimates carried out for the impact assessment on the proposed directive, given that CCS is provided for in the EU ETS and assuming a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, 7 million tonnes of CO2 could be stored in 2020, and up to 160 million tonnes by 2030.
Emisije CO2, preprečene leta 2030, bi predstavljale približno 15 % zahtevanega zmanjšanja v Evropi.
The CO2 emissions avoided in 2030 would account for some 15% of the reductions required in Europe.
Bistveno bo poiskati finančne spodbude za preoblikovanje CCS v skupni ukrep, ki bo več kot zgolj struktura za usklajevanje „mreže projektov“.
It will be essential to find financial incentives to transform CCS into a joint action which is more than a mere structure for coordinating a ‘network of projects’.
Evropski in nacionalni javni organi bodo morali pomagati podjetjem pri kritju začetnih stroškov zajemanja in shranjevanja ogljika, dokler ne bo postala ta tehnologija komercialno donosna.
The European and national public authorities must help firms to cover the initial costs of CCS until the technology is commercially viable.
Ta finančni prispevek je treba obravnavati kot nujno potreben v prehodnem obdobju od sedanje fosilne energije, ki bo ohranila vodilni položaj v prihodnjih desetletjih, do alternativne energije, ki bo postopno prevzela vodilno vlogo.
This financial outlay must be regarded as essential during the transitional period between current fossil fuel energies, which will remain predominant over the next few decades, and the alternative energies which will gradually replace them.
V Evropi bo treba zgraditi novo infrastrukturo, da bo ta prehod uspešen.
New infrastructures will need to be built in Europe to make this transition a success.
Nadaljevati je treba s prizadevanji za raziskave in razvoj, vendar pa je treba preskusiti te tehnologije zdaj, da se dokaže njihova zanesljivost, pripraviti pa je treba tudi pilotne in predstavitvene projekte v Evropski uniji.
R+D efforts must be pursued, but these technologies must be tried out now to demonstrate their reliability and pilots projects and demonstrators must be built in the European Union.
Razmisliti moramo tudi o možnostih predstavitve tehnologij, pri katerih se lahko uporabijo fosilna goriva, zlasti premog, z namenom trajnostnega razvoja.
We will also have to consider possible ways of demonstrating technologies whereby fossil fuels, particularly coal, can be used with a view to sustainable development.
Komisija bi morala na tej podlagi določiti najboljše načine za podpiranje načrtovanja, izgradnje in obratovanja do 12 velikih predstavitvenih obratov.
The Commission should determine, on that basis, the best means of supporting the design, construction and operation of up to 12 large-scale demonstration plants.
Tehnologija CCS lahko postane komercialno donosna le, če bodo industrija in javni organi pravočasno sprejeli energetske pobude in močne finančne spodbude.
CCS technology can only become commercially viable if industry and public bodies put in place energy initiatives and strong financial incentives in good time.
Ta tehnologija bi morala omogočiti EU, da prevzame vodilno vlogo na svetovni ravni na področju različnih čistih in učinkovitih energetskih tehnologij z malo emisijami ogljika.
This technology should place the EU in the fore-front worldwide among the wide range of clean, efficient, low-carbon energy technologies.
Predlog Komisije je dobra podlaga za razpravo, ker zagotavlja jasnejši in koristnejši pravni okvir za shranjevanje CO2.
The Commission proposal forms a good basis for discussion, since it provides a clearer and more useful legal framework for CO2 storage.
Prav tako natančno določa postopek odobritve in spremljanja: razdelitev na faze, vrste tehničnih dokazov, ki jih je treba zagotoviti na vsaki stopnji, posvetovanja, nadzor, preprečevanje, popravni ukrepi v primeru težav, finančna jamstva, inšpekcijski pregledi, spremljanje, dostop tretjih oseb itd.
It also provides a firm framework for both the authorisation and the follow-up process: division into phases, type of technical evidence to be supplied at each stage, consultations, monitoring, preventive measures, corrective measures to be taken in the event of a problem, financial guarantees, inspections, follow-up, third-party access, etc.
Kaže, da to besedilo ne vsebuje nerešljivih težav, vendar so potrebne nekatere prilagoditve in pojasnitve.
This text does not appear to present any insurmountable problems, subject to a few adjustments and clarifications.
Zanimanje za CCS bi se lahko močno zmanjšalo, če bi imele države članice možnost, da prepovedo vse shranjevanje CO2 ali celo vse raziskave območij shranjevanja CO2 na svojem ozemlju.
CCS could become considerably less attractive if Member States were able to ban any storage of CO2 or even any exploration of CO2 storage sites on their territory.
Države članice imajo različne pristope k tehnologiji CCS ter niso vse enako navdušene nad njo.
The approach to, and degree of enthusiasm for, CCS technology varies from one Member State to another.
Nekatere države članice nimajo natančnih študij o zmogljivostih ali območjih shranjevanja na svojem ozemlju.
Some Member States do not possess any precise studies on storage capacities or sites on their territories.
Komisija je na začetku leta 2007 predlagala, da velik del obratov, ki izpuščajo največ CO2, do leta 2020 svoje strukture prilagodi tehnologiji CCS.
In early 2007 the Commission proposed that a large proportion of the plants emitting the greatest quantity of CO2 should make their structures compatible with CCS technology by 2020.
Ta zamisel je bila opuščena z razlogom, da ta tehnologija do omenjenega datuma ne bi bila finančno zanimiva.
This idea was abandoned on the grounds that the technology was not financially attractive at that time.
S to direktivo bi bila lahko uvedena klavzula o pregledu za revizijo direktive.
The forthcoming directive could introduce a rendezvous clause for the revision of the directive.
S to revizijo bi lahko postala CSS od določenega datuma obvezna za vse nove kurilne naprave z zmogljivostjo nad 300 MW.
Such revision might involve making CCS compulsory from a given date for new combustion plants of over 300 MW.
Obveznost, da vsaka nova kurilna naprava poskrbi za zajemanje in shranjevanje ogljika v prihodnosti (pojem „pripravljen za zajemanje“), bo ostala sorazmerno omejena, če cilji ne bodo jasno določeni.
The requirement for all new power plants to take into account the future implementation of CCS (the concept of 'ready-to-capture') will remain rather limited in its effect unless clear objectives are set.
Vprašljivi so tudi zelo kratki roki za fazo raziskovanja, zlasti za poskuse vbrizgavanja majhnih količin CO2, za dopolnitev rezultatov študij pred začetkom vlaganja zahtev za pridobitev dovoljenja za shranjevanje.
Questions may also be raised over the very short time allowed for the exploration stage, including in particular tests on the injection of small quantities of CO2 to back up studies ahead of requests for authorisation to store CO2.
Izkušnje na področju raziskovanja območij shranjevanja zemeljskega plina kažejo, da so potrebna veliko daljša obdobja za fazo raziskovanja v točno določenem geološkem okolju.
Experience in searching for natural gas storage sites seems to show that much longer periods are needed for the exploration stage in a given geological context.
Opraviti je treba več raziskav o mogočih vplivih zadrževanja CO2 na okolje ter njegovega uhajanja v morsko in kopensko okolje.
More research is needed on the possible environmental effects of CO2 retention, and of leakages into the marine or land environment.
Vprašanja o lastninskih pravicah in odgovornosti v primeru uhajanja bodo najbrž najspornejša.
The questions concerning property rights and liability in case of leakage promise to be the trickiest.
Zajemanje in shranjevanje ogljika ni tako priljubljena rešitev kot vetrna energija, energija plimovanja ali sončna energija.
CCS is not as popular a solution as wind, tidal or solar energy.
Potreben bo nov razvoj, zlasti v zvezi s shranjevanjem, pri čemer bo treba odpraviti več ovir, preden bo zajemanje in shranjevanje ogljika postalo res uporabna tehnika za zmanjševanje emisij CO2.
New developments will be needed, particularly as regards storage, and several obstacles will thus have to be overcome before CCS can become a fully-fledged technique for CO2 emissions reduction.
Vključuje zajemanje ogljikovega dioksida (CO2) iz industrijskih obratov, transport do območja shranjevanja ter vbrizgavanje v ustrezno geološko formacijo z namenom trajnega shranjevanja.
It consists of the capture of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from industrial installations, its transport to a storage site and its injection into a suitable geological formation for the purposes of permanent storage.