natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kadar Komisija ugotovi, da je država članica presegla svojo ribolovno kvoto, dodelitev ali delež staleža oziroma skupine staležev, ki so ji na voljo, lahko v naslednjem letu izvede odbitek od letne kvote, dodelitve ali deleža države članice, ki je presegla dovoljeni obseg ribolova, z uporabo multiplikatorja v skladu z naslednjo tabelo:
When the Commission has established that a Member State has overfished its quota, allocation or share of a stock or a group of stocks available to it the Commission shall operate deductions in the following year from the annual quota, allocation or share of the Member State which has overfished by applying a multiplying factor according to the following table:
Večletne kazni za prelov bi bilo treba urejati z uredbo Sveta.
Multiannual penalties for overfishing should be regulated by means of a Council Regulation.
Nad 10 % do 20 %
Over 10% up to 20%
Nad 20 % do 40 %
Over 20% up to 40%
Nad 40 % do 50 %
Over 40% up to 50%
Vsak nadaljnji prelov nad 50 %
Any further overfishing greater than 50%
Obseg prelova glede na dovoljene iztovore
Extent of overfishing relative to the permitted landings
Prvih 10 %
The first 10%
Odbitek = prelov x 1,00
Deduction = Overfishing x 1,00
Naslednjih 10 % do 20 % skupaj
The next 10% up to 20% in total
Odbitek = prelov x 1,10
Deduction = Overfishing x 1,10
Naslednjih 20% do 40% skupaj
The next 20% up to 40% in total
Odbitek = prelov x 1,20
Deduction = Overfishing x 1,20
Vsak nadaljnji prelov nad 40 %
Any further overfishing greater than 40%
Odbitek = prelov x 1,40
Deduction = Overfishing x 1,40
Opomba: Odstotkovni intervali se nadomestijo z vrednostmi z intervali iz člena 5(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 847/96 z dne 6. maja 1996 o uvedbi dodatnih pogojev za upravljanje celotnih dovoljenih ulovov (TAC) in kvot iz leta v leto.
Note : The percentage intervals shall be replaced by the intervals set in Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 847/96 of 6 May 1996 introducing additional conditions for year-to-year management of TACs and quotas.
V tabeli s kaznimi kršitve, izražene v odstotkih, neustrezno odražajo razmere pri prekoračenih kvotah.
As regards the table of penalties, those expressed in percentages do not properly reflect the situation regarding quotas exceeded.
Tako je zlasti pri globokomorskih vrstah, kjer so kvote za nekatere države članice omejene na majhne količine, ki so lahko celo nižje od 30–50 ton.
This is the case in particular for deep-water species, where, for some Member States, the quotas are limited to small quantities that may even be less than 30-50 tonnes.
Člen 97 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 97 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Če kvota, dodelitev ali delež staleža oziroma skupine staležev, ki so dodeljeni državi članici, ne presežejo 100 ton, se znižanje za presežek kvote dodeljuje linearno, in ne po odstotkih, razen za vrste, vključene v večletni načrt, za katere velja odstavek 1.
If the quota, allocation or share of a stock or a group of stocks allocated to a Member State does not exceed 100 tonnes, the reduction for exceeding the quota shall be applied in a linear manner and not by percentage, except for species covered by a multiannual plan to which paragraph 1 shall apply.
Pri relativno nizkih kvotah za določene vrste se lahko prelov dogaja v majhnem številu voda oziroma ga povzroči majhno število plovil.
In the case of relatively low quotas for certain species, the overfishing may take place in a very small number of waters or be caused by very few vessels.
Uporaba sistema odstotkov, predvidenega za take primere, bi lahko vodila do takojšnjega zaprtja ribolovnih območij in povzročila nepopravljivo škodo ostalim plovilom.
The application of the percentage system envisaged in such cases may lead to the immediate closure of the fishery causing irreparable damage to the other vessels.
Linearni sistem bi bil v takih primerih pravičnejši.
A linear system would be much fairer in such instances.
Če je država članica v predhodnih dveh letih večkrat zapored presegla svojo ribolovno kvoto, dodelitev ali delež staleža oziroma skupine staležev, če je prelov posebno škodljiv za zadevne staleže ali če za staleže velja večletni načrt, se multiplikator iz odstavka 1 podvoji.
If a Member State has repeatedly overfished its quota, allocation or share of the stock or group of stocks over the previous two years, if the overfishing is particularly detrimental to the stock concerned or if the stock is subject to a multiannual plan, the multiplying factor referred to in paragraph 1 shall be doubled.
Če je država članica v predhodnih dveh letih večkrat zapored presegla svojo ribolovno kvoto, dodelitev ali delež staleža oziroma skupine staležev, ki so posebej občutljivi za prelov ali zanje velja večletni načrt, se multiplikator iz odstavka 1 podvoji.
If , over the previous two years, a Member State has repeatedly overfished its quota, allocation or share of a stock or group of stocks that is particularly sensitive to over-fishing or subject to a multiannual plan, the multiplying factor referred to in paragraph 1 shall be doubled.
Ukrepi, kot je podvajanje kazenskega koeficienta, bi morali biti omejeni na vrste z biološkim tveganjem, ki so posebej občutljive za prelov ali so vključene v večletne načrte.
Measures such as the doubling of penalty coefficients should be reserved for species that are at biological risk, are particularly sensitive to over-fishing or are included in a multiannual plan.
Upoštevati je treba, da kvote niso povezane z biološkim statusom ribolovnega območja in da se zaradi relativne stabilnosti številnim državam članicam dodeljujejo ribolovne kvote, ki jih ne uporabijo, tako da druga država članica s preseganjem svoje kvote ne prispeva vedno k prelovu vira.
It should be borne in mind that the quotas are not linked to the biological status of a fishery and that as a result of relative stability many Member States receive fishing quotas that they do not use, so another Member State exceeding its quota does not necessarily contribute to overfishing of the resource.
Vendar je logično, da je treba kaznovati preseganje kvote, kot je že predvideno v odstavku 1.
It is, however, logical that exceeding the quota be punished, as already provided for in paragraph 1.
Člen 97 – odstavek 3
Article 97 – paragraph 3
Če država članica zajema ulove iz staležev, za katere velja kvota, vendar nima na voljo take kvote, dodelitve ali deleža staleža oziroma skupine staležev, lahko Komisija v naslednjem letu ali letih odšteje odbitek od drugih kvot ali skupin staležev, ki so tej državi članici na voljo v skladu z odstavkom 1.
If a Member State takes catches from a stock subject to a quota for which it has no quota, allocation or share of a stock or a group of stocks available to it, the Commission may deduct in the following year or years quotas for other stocks or groups of stocks available to that Member State in accordance with paragraph 1.
Novi ukrepi, ki so bili uvedeni, niso dovolj natančno razloženi.
The new measures introduced are not sufficiently well explained.
Ni na primer jasno, ali so v ulove vključeni zavržki, ni posebej navedeno, za katere druge vrste bo veljala omejitev, niti niso določena merila za eno- ali večletno izvajanje omejitve.
It is not, for example, clear whether catches include discards, it is not specified to which other species the reduction shall apply, nor have criteria been established for carrying out the reduction over one or more years.
Ribolov brez kvot je med najhujšimi kršitvami SRP in vsako državo članico, ki ga dovoli, bi bilo treba strogo kaznovati, tudi v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1005/2008, saj gre v tem primeru za nezakonit ribolov.
Fishing without a quota is one of the most serious infringements that can be committed under the CFP and any Member State which allows this should be severely punished, including under Regulation 1005/2008, as this would be illegal fishing.
Vendar pa ni smiselno kaznovati drugega ladjevja te države članice, ki je nedolžno.
It does not, however, make sense, to punish other innocent fleets from that same Member State.
Pravično bi bilo, da kazen zadene stran, ki je storila kršitev, in stran, ki je to omogočila, ne pa tretjih strani.
In justice, punishment should fall on the party that committed the offence and the party which permitted this, not on third parties.
Odbitki kvot zaradi neizpolnjevanja ciljev skupne ribiške politike
Deduction of quotas for failure to comply with the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy
Če obstajajo dokazi, da država članica ne izpolnjuje pravil o ohranjevanju, nadzoru, inšpekcijskih pregledih ali izvrševanju v okviru skupne ribiške politike in da to lahko resno ogroža ohranjevanje živih vodnih virov ali učinkovito delovanje sistema nadzora in izvrševanja Skupnosti, lahko Komisija izvede odbitek od letnih kvot, dodelitev ali deležev staleža oziroma skupine staležev, ki so na voljo tej državi članici.
Where there is evidence that rules on conservation, control, inspection or enforcement under the Common Fisheries Policy are not being complied with by a Member State and that this may lead to a serious threat to the conservation of living aquatic resources or the effective operation of the Community control and enforcement system, the Commission may operate deductions from the annual quotas, allocations or shares of a stock or group of stocks available to that Member State.
Komisija zadevno državo članico pisno obvesti o svojih ugotovitvah in določi rok, ki ni daljši od desetih delovnih dni, v katerem mora država članica dokazati, da se ribolovna območja lahko varno izkoriščajo.
The Commission shall inform in writing the Member State concerned of its findings and set a deadline of no more than 10 working days for the Member State to demonstrate that the fisheries can be safely exploited.
Ukrepi iz odstavka 1 se uporabijo le, če država članica ne odgovori na to zahtevo Komisije v roku, določenem v odstavku 2, ali če se odgovor šteje za nezadovoljivega ali jasno kaže na dejstvo, da se potrebni ukrepi niso izvedli.
The measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall only apply if the Member State fails to respond to this request of the Commission within the deadline given in paragraph 2 or if the response is considered unsatisfactory or is clearly indicative of the fact that the necessary measures have not been implemented.
Podrobnejša pravila za uporabo tega člena, zlasti za določitev zadevnih količin, se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 111.
Detailed rules for the application of this article, and in particular for determining the quantities concerned, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 111.
Državo članico je treba kaznovati, za kar obstaja več možnosti, med njimi je tudi možnost iz člena 95 te uredbe.
The Member State should be punished and there are various possibilities for doing so, one of which is within the framework of Article 95 of this Regulation.
Vendar Komisija ne sme kaznovati ribičev zaradi slabega sistema nadzora njihove države članice zastave, prav tako ne sme enostransko spremeniti relativne stabilnosti države članice.
The Commission cannot, however, punish fishermen for their flag Member State's bad control practices, nor can it unilaterally alter the relative stability of a Member State.
Uporaba možnosti, da se državi članici znižajo kvote na pobudo Komisije, če slednja od države članice ne prejme odgovora ali se odgovor šteje za nezadovoljivega, bi morala biti omejena zgolj na dobro utemeljene in upravičene primere, izvesti pa bi jo bilo treba s sklepom Sveta.
The possibility of reducing a Member State's quotas, on the Commission's initiative, if the Commission does not receive a response from that Member State or if the response is considered unsatisfactory, should only occur in well justified and substantiated cases, and be done through a Council Decision.
Predlog ne utemeljuje ustrezno pogojev za izvedbo te možnosti, kar ustvarja pravno negotovost.
The proposal does not properly justify the conditions for exercising this option, which creates a situation of great legal uncertainty.
Člen 100
Article 100
Zavrnitev izmenjave kvot
Refusal of quota exchanges
Komisija lahko zavrne možnost izmenjave kvot v skladu s členom 20(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002:
The Commission may exclude the possibility to exchange quotas according to Article 20 paragraph 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002:
a) za kvote, pri katerih so bile za več kot 10 % presežene kvote, ki so na voljo eni od zadevnih držav članic, v katerem koli od predhodnih dveh let, ali
a) for quotas for which there was an overfishing of more than 10% of the quotas available to one of the Member State concerned in one of the immediately preceding two years or
b) če zadevna država članica ne sprejme ustreznih ukrepov, da bi zagotovila pravilno upravljanje ribolovnih možnosti zadevnih staležev, zlasti zaradi nedelovanja računalniško podprtega sistema potrjevanja iz člena 102 ali nezadostnega delovanja sistemov za zagotavljanje podatkov za ta sistem potrjevanja.
b) if the Member State concerned does not take appropriate measures to ensure a proper management of the fishing opportunities of the stocks concerned, in particular by not operating a computerized validation system as referred to in Article 102 or by insufficiently operating the systems providing the data for this validation system.
Komisija ne more nasprotovati izmenjavi kvot, določeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike.
The Commission cannot object to the exchange of quotas laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy.
Dejstvo je, da je treba državo članico kaznovati zaradi prekoračitve kvot.
It is acknowledged that a Member State should be punished for exceeding quotas.
Vendar pa je prelov za 10 % jasen znak, da država članica nima zadostne kvote, medtem ko ima druga država članica preveliko kvoto, če jo lahko izmenjuje.
However, over-fishing by 10% is a clear signal that the Member State does not have a sufficient quota, whilst another Member State has too large a quota given that it can exchange this.
Ni pa smiselno uvajati sankcij s prepovedjo izmenjave kvot, saj to oškoduje tudi drugo državo članico.
It does not, however, make sense to impose sanctions by banning the exchange of quotas, as this also penalises the second Member State.
Zato bi bilo treba zadevo urediti v skladu z Uredbo 2371/2002 in istočasno določiti pravila, v skladu s katerimi bo mogoče izkoristiti nezadostno uporabljene kvote.
This matter should therefore be settled under Regulation 2371/2002, with rules being set at the same time to make it possible to benefit from under-used quotas.
Člen 101 – odstavek 1
Article 101 – paragraph 1
Če obstajajo dokazi, vključno s tistimi, ki temeljijo na izsledkih vzorčenja, ki ga opravi Komisija, da ribolovne dejavnosti in/ali ukrepi države članice ali držav članic slabijo skupno ribiško politiko ali ogrožajo morski ekosistem, to pa zahteva takojšnje ukrepanje, se lahko Komisija na utemeljeno zahtevo katere koli države članice ali na lastno pobudo odloči sprejeti nujne ukrepe, ki trajajo največ eno leto .
If there is evidence, including based on the results of the sampling carried out by the Commission, that fishing activities and/or measures adopted by a Member State or Member States undermine the Common Fisheries Policy or threaten the marine eco-system and this requires immediate action, the Commission, at the substantiated request of any Member State or on its own initiative, may decide on emergency measures which shall last not more than one year .
Komisija lahko sprejme novo odločitev za podaljšanje nujnih ukrepov za največ šest mesecev.
The Commission may take a new decision to extend the emergency measures for no more than six months.
Če obstajajo dokazi, vključno s tistimi, ki temeljijo na izsledkih vzorčenja, ki ga opravi Komisija, da ribolovne dejavnosti in/ali ukrepi države članice ali držav članic slabijo skupno ribiško politiko ali ogrožajo morski ekosistem, to pa zahteva takojšnje ukrepanje, se lahko Komisija na utemeljeno zahtevo katere koli države članice ali na lastno pobudo odloči sprejeti nujne ukrepe, ki trajajo največ šest mesecev .
If there is evidence, including based on the results of the sampling carried out by the Commission, that fishing activities and/or measures adopted by a Member State or Member States undermine the Common Fisheries Policy or threaten the marine eco-system and this requires immediate action, the Commission, at the substantiated request of any Member State or on its own initiative, may decide on emergency measures which shall last not more than six months .
Zaradi strogih kazni iz odstavka 2 tega člena bi bilo enoletno obdobje pretirano.
Given the severity of the sanctions set out in paragraph 2 of this Article, a 1-year period seems excessive.
Šest mesecev je za krivo državo članico dovolj, da lahko sprejme potrebne korektivne ukrepe.
Six months is enough time for the Member State at fault to be able to take the requisite corrective measures.
Člen 101 – odstavek 2 – točka g
Article 101 – paragraph 2 – point g
g) prepoved ribolova za ribiška plovila, ki plujejo pod zastavo zadevne države članice, v vodah pod jurisdikcijo drugih držav članic;
g) prohibition for fishing vessels flying the flag of the Member State concerned to fish in waters under the jurisdiction of other Member States;
g) prepoved ribolova za ribiška plovila, ki plujejo pod zastavo zadevne države članice, v vodah pod jurisdikcijo drugih držav članic ali tretje države, ali na odprtem morju ;
g) prohibition for fishing vessels flying the flag of the Member State concerned to fish in waters under the jurisdiction of other Member States or of a third country, or on the high seas ;
Prepovedati ribolov za plovila v vodah drugih držav članic, hkrati pa jim dovoliti. da to počnejo izven EU je diskriminatorno, saj bi imelo za posledico, da bi se plovilom iz držav članic, ki ne izvajajo skupne ribiške politike, dovolilo ali da bi se jih spodbujalo, naj izvajajo ribolov izven EU.
Prohibiting vessels from fishing in the waters of other Member States but allowing them to go outside the EU is discriminatory, as it would result in vessels from Member States that do not enforce the CFP being allowed, or encouraged, to fish outside the EU.
Člen 101 – odstavek 3
Article 101 – paragraph 3
Država članica hkrati sporoči zahtevo iz odstavka 1 Komisiji in zadevnim državam članicam.
A Member State shall communicate the request referred to in paragraph 1 simultaneously to the Commission and to the Member States concerned.
Druge države članice lahko Komisiji predložijo pisne pripombe v petih delovnih dneh od prejema zahtevka.
The other Member States may submit their written comments to the Commission within five working days of receipt of the request.
Komisija sprejme odločbo v 15 delovnih dneh od prejema zahtevka.
The Commission shall take a decision within 15 working days of receipt of the request.
Druge države članice lahko Komisiji predložijo pisne pripombe v 15 delovnih dneh od prejema zahtevka.
The other Member States may submit their written comments to the Commission within 15 working days of receipt of the request.
Ne zdi se ustrezno, da bi imela država članica zgolj pet dni za predložitev pripomb, medtem ko ima Komisija za sprejetje odločitve o isti zadevi na razpolago 15 dni.
It does not appear appropriate that the Member State should only have five days in which to submit its comments when the Commission has 15 days in which to take its decision on the same matter.
Člen 101 – odstavek 5
Article 101 – paragraph 5
Zadevne države članice lahko odločbo Komisije predajo Svetu v desetih delovnih dneh od prejema uradnega obvestila.
The Member States concerned may refer the Commission decision to the Council within 10 working days of receipt of the notification.
Zadevne države članice lahko odločbo Komisije predajo Svetu v petnajstih delovnih dneh od prejema uradnega obvestila.
The Member States concerned may refer the Commission decision to the Council within 15 working days of receipt of the notification.
Kot pri predlogu spremembe 83 je tudi pri tem predlogu spremembe cilj tesnejša usklajenost obdobij, ki so na razpolago upravnim organom in različnim institucijam Skupnosti.
As with Amendment 83, the aim is the closer alignment of the periods available to the administrative authorities and the various Community institutions.
Komisiji ali drugi državi članici se ne sporočijo imena fizičnih oseb , razen ko je tako obveščanje izrecno določeno v tej uredbi ali če je to potrebno zaradi preprečevanja ali preganjanja kršitev ali zaradi preverjanja očitnih kršitev.
The names of natural persons shall not be communicated to the Commission or to another Member State except in the case where such communication is expressly provided for in this Regulation or if it is necessary for the purposes of preventing or pursuing infringements or the verification of apparent infringements.
Podatki iz odstavka 1 se ne smejo pošiljati, razen če so v istem sklopu kakor drugi podatki, in to v obliki, ki ne dopušča posredne ali neposredne identifikacije fizičnih oseb.
The data referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be transmitted unless they are aggregated with other data in a form, which does not permit the direct or indirect identification of natural persons.
Komisiji ali drugi državi članici se ne sporočijo osebni podatki , razen ko je tako obveščanje izrecno določeno v tej uredbi ali če je to potrebno zaradi preprečevanja ali preganjanja kršitev ali zaradi preverjanja očitnih kršitev.
Personal data shall not be communicated to the Commission or to another Member State except in the case where such communication is expressly provided for in this Regulation or if it is necessary for the purposes of preventing or pursuing infringements or the verification of apparent infringements.
Člen 105 – odstavek 1
Article 105 – paragraph 1
Države članice in Komisija sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovijo zaupno obravnavo podatkov, prejetih in zbranih na podlagi te uredbe, ter upoštevajo vsa pravila o poklicni in poslovni skrivnosti podatkov.
Member States and the Commission shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the data collected and received within the framework of this Regulation shall be treated in a confidential manner and shall respect all rules on professional and commercial secrecy of data.
Države članice in Komisija sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovijo zaupno obravnavo podatkov, prejetih in zbranih na podlagi te uredbe, ter upoštevajo vsa pravila o poklicni in poslovni skrivnosti podatkov v skladu z vsemi veljavnimi določbami iz Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 in Direktive 95/46/ES .
Member States and the Commission shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the data collected and received within the framework of this Regulation shall be treated in a confidential manner and shall respect all rules on professional and commercial secrecy of data , consistent with all applicable provisions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Directive 95/46/EC .
Člen 105 – odstavek 4
Article 105 – paragraph 4
Podatki, ki se na podlagi te uredbe sporočijo osebam, ki delajo za pristojne organe, sodišča, druge javne organe in Komisijo ali organ, ki ga ta imenuje, in katerih razkritje bi škodilo:
Data communicated in the framework of this Regulation to persons working for competent authorities, courts, other public authorities and the Commission or the body designated by it, the disclosure of which would undermine:
a) varovanju zasebnosti in integritete posameznika v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti o varstvu osebnih podatkov;
a) the protection of the privacy and the integrity of the individual, in accordance with Community legislation regarding the protection of personal data,
b) poslovnim interesom fizične ali pravne osebe, vključno z intelektualno lastnino;
b) the commercial interests of a natural or legal person, including intellectual property,
c) poteku sodnih postopkov in pravnemu svetovanju ali
c) court proceedings and legal advice or
d) namenu inšpekcijskih pregledov ali preiskav;
d) the scope of inspections or investigations,