natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(3b) Členu 11 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(3b) In A rticle 11, the following paragraph is added:
Pri razvoju SIS II je mogoča tudi nadomestna tehnična rešitev.“
The development of SIS II may be achieved by implementing an alternative technical solution ."
Člen 11, ki določa različne korake dejanske migracije, bi moral vsebovati tudi sklicevanje na možen alternativni scenarij, če projekt SIS II ne bo uspešen.
Article 11, which describes the different steps of the actual migration, should contain a reference to a possible alternative scenario, in case the SIS II project is not successful.
Člen 1 – točka 3c (novo)
Article 1 – point 3c (new)
(3c) Členu 14 se doda naslednji odstavek:
( 3c ) In A rticle 14, the following paragraph is added:
Komisija razvije in izvrši sveženj dodatnih ukrepov za preprečevanje uhajanja osebnih podatkov iz podatkovne baze in za zagotovitev varovanja osebnih podatkov ves čas testiranja in migracije s SIS I na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II).“
The Commission shall develop and implement a package with additional measures in order to prevent the leakage of personal data information from the database and to assure the protection of personal data for the entire duration of testing and migration from SIS I to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)."
Člen 17a – odstavek 1
Article 17a – paragraph 1
Brez poseganja v odgovornosti in dejavnosti Komisije, Francije in držav članic, ki sodelujejo v SIS 1+, se ustanovi skupina tehničnih strokovnjakov, imenovana Odbor za globalno upravljanje programa.
Without prejudice to the respective responsibilities and activities of the Commission, France and the Member States participating in SIS 1+, a group of technical experts, called the Global Programme Management Board (hereinafter the "GPMB"), is hereby set up.
Odbor za globalno upravljanje programa bo deloval kot forum za podporo razvoju centralnega projekta SIS II .
The GPMB shall provide a forum for assistance to the development of C entral SIS II.
Zagotavljati bi moral doslednost in usklajenost centralnih in nacionalnih projektov SIS II.
It should facilitate consistency and provide for coordination of the central and national SIS II projects.
Mandat Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa mora biti jasno določen, da bi lahko dejavno prispeval k upravljanju razvoja druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema in procesu migracije.
The mandate of the GPMB should be more clearly defined, in order to enable it to contribute actively to the management of the development of the second-generation SIS and the migration process.
Člen 17a – odstavek 2
Article 17a – paragraph 2
V Odboru za globalno upravljanje bo največ 10 članov, ki bodo usposobljeni za dejavno prispevanje k razvoju sistema SIS II in ki se bodo redno sestajali.
The GPMB shall be composed of a maximum of 10 members who shall be qualified contribute actively to the development of the SIS II and who shall meet on a regular basis, .
Največ dva člana in dva namestnika imenuje generalni direktor pristojnega generalnega direktorata Komisije, in sicer izmed uradnikov Komisije.
A maximum of two members and two alternates shall be designated by the Director General of the responsible Directorate-General of the Commission from among Commission officials.
Zainteresirani poslanci ali pristojni zaposleni Evropskega parlamenta, strokovnjaki držav članic in uradniki Komisije, ki so neposredno vključeni v razvoj projektov SIS II se lahko na stroške svoje uprave ali institucije udeležijo sestankov Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa.
I nterested Members or relevant staff of the European Parliament, experts from Member States and Commission officials directly involved in the development of the SIS II projects may attend GPMB meetings at the expense of their respective administration or institution.
V poslovniku je določeno, da lahko Odbor za upravljanje globalnega programa, sicer na stroške zadevnih uprav, institucij ali podjetij, k sodelovanju na svojih sejah povabi še druge strokovnjake.
The GPMB may invite other experts to participate in GPMB meetings as defined in the terms of reference at the expense of their respective administration, institution or company.
Med pristojnosti in naloge Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa spadata zahteva po objavljanju rednih poročil in zahteva, da so poročila na voljo Evropskemu parlamentu, da se zagotovita popoln parlamentarni nadzor in pregled.
The terms of reference of the GPMB shall include a requirement to publish regular reports and to make those reports available to the European Parliament in order to ensure full parliamentary scrutiny and oversight.
Brez poseganja v člen 15(2) se upravni in potni stroški, ki nastanejo zaradi dejavnosti Odbora za upravljanje globalnega programa, krijejo iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije, če se ne krijejo iz drugih virov.
Without prejudice to Article 15(2), the administrative costs and travel expenses arising from the activities of the GPMB shall be borne by the general budget of the European Union, to the extent that they are not reimbursed from other sources.
Odobrena proračunska sredstva, potrebna za kritje stroškov, nastalih zaradi zasedanj Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa, izhajajo iz odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, trenutno predvidenih v finančnem načrtovanju za obdobje 2010–2013 za drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II).
The necessary appropriations to cover the cost arising from the meetings of the GPMB shall come from the appropriations currently provided for in the Financial Programming 2010-2013 for the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II).
Veljati preneha z dnem, ki ga določi Svet v skladu s členom 71(2) Sklepa 2007/533/PNZ.
It shall expire on a date to be fixed by the Council, acting in accordance with Article 71(2) of Decision 2007/533/JHA.
Veljati preneha z dnem, ki ga določi Svet v skladu s členom 71(2) Sklepa 2007/533/PNZ, v vsakem primeru pa najpozneje 31. decembra 2013.
It shall expire on a date to be fixed by the Council, acting in accordance with Article 71(2) of Decision 2007/533/JHA , and in any event no later than on 31 December 2013 .
Pred tem in pred začetkom delovanja sistema ga je treba v celoti testirati, da bi preverili, ali bo SIS II deloval v skladu s tehničnimi in funkcijskimi zahtevami, kot so vzdržljivost, razpoložljivost in učinkovitost.
Before this can happen and the system starts operating, it must be fully tested, with a view to assessing whether SIS II can work in accordance with the technical and functional requirements such as robustness, availability and performance.
Le po uspešno zaključenih preizkusih sistema SIS II je mogoče narediti naslednji korak: migracijo uporabnikov SIS 1+ na okolje SIS II, pri čemer se mora prehod opraviti istočasno v vseh državah članicah (enkratna migracija).
Only after the successful completion of all SIS II tests we can go for the next step: the migration of the SIS I+ users to the SIS II environment, where the switch-over should take place on the same date for all Member States - "one-shoot migration".
Dogovorjeno je bilo, da se vzpostavi prehodna tehnična struktura, ki bo omogočala sočasno delovanje SIS 1+ in nekaterih tehničnih elementov strukture SIS II v omejenem prehodnem obdobju, hkrati pa so želeli pojasniti pogoje, postopke, odgovornosti, financiranje procesa migracije in pravni okvir, ki bo veljal med migracijo.
It was decided to create an interim technical architecture allowing that the SIS I + and certain technical parts of the architecture of SIS II to be able to operate in parallel for a limited transitional period, and at the same time they tried to clarify conditions, procedures, responsibilities, the financing of the migration process and the substantive legal framework applicable during migration.
Uvedeno je bilo novo tehnično orodje (pretvornik) za uspešno pretvorbo in sinhronizacijo podatkov med SIS 1+ in SIS II.
A new technical tool was introduced - a "converter" - allowing for the successful conversion and synchronisation of data between SIS I+ and SIS II.
Pretvornik bo povezoval centralni sistem SIS 1 s centralnim sistemom SIS II in jima tako omogočal obdelavo istih podatkov, državam članicam, ki so že uspešno povezane v sistem SIS II, pa zagotovil, da ostanejo na enaki ravni kot tiste, ki so še vedno povezane s SIS 1+.
In fact, the SIS I central system and the SIS II central system will be connect through the converter enabling them to process the same information and ensuring that the Member States already successful connected to the SIS II stay on the same level as the others that are still connected to the SIS I+.
Dodana je bila tudi nova funkcija (možnost prehoda nazaj), da se omogoči delovanje prehodne tehnične strukture.
A new function - "the reverse mode" - has also been added in order to allow this interim technical architecture to work.
Operativni zagon SIS II bo pomenil konce razvojne faze in začetek izvrševanja pravne podlage SIS II.
The operational start of SIS II will close the development phase and the beginning of the SIS II legal basis applicability.
Klavzula o prenehanju veljavnosti določa, da ta poteče 30. junija 2010 .
The sunset clause sets the date for expiry at 30 June 2010 .
V skladu s sklepi Sveta z dne 4. in 5. junija 2009 se izvajanje sedanjega projekta SIS II nadaljuje, vendar bo v obdobju, ki je potrebno za testiranje SIS II, za vsak slučaj ohranjen še načrt ukrepov za obvladovanje izrednih razmer (SIS 1+RE).
According to the Council conclusions of 4/5 June 2009 the current SIS II project is being continued, but a contingency plan (SIS 1+RE) is kept in reserve for the period necessary to test SIS II.
Uveljavitev Lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2010 je na ta sveženj vplivala tako: prvi del svežnja, COM(2009)508, je ostal v obravnavi.
The effect of the entry into force of the new Treaty on 1 December 2010 on this package was as follows: The first part of the package, COM(2009)508, remained pending.
Uvrščen je bil na seznam v prilogi 4 omnibus sporočila Komisije „Posledice začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja“.
It was listed in annex 4 of the "omnibus" Communication of the Commission on "Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing inter-institutional decision-making procedures".
Nova pravna podlaga v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo je člen 74 PDEU.
The new legal basis under the Treaty of Lisbon is Article 74 TFEU.
Komisija predlaga popolno črtanje klavzule o prenehanju veljavnosti, kar pomeni, da datum poteka instrumentov več ne bi bil določen.
The Commission proposes to delete the sunset clause completely, i.e. not to set date for the expiry of the instruments any more.
Dejstvo, da Komisija ne more predlagati možnega datuma za operativni začetek SIS II, ni prepričljivo in zbuja velike dvome o načinu upravljanja projekta.
The fact that the Commission is not able to propose a possible date for the start of operations of the SIS II is inconceivable and raises enormous doubts in the way the project is being managed.
V skladu s predlogom Komisije bi predlagane spremembe zajemale tudi možnost prehoda s projekta SIS II, če ta ne bi bil uspešen, na alternativni scenarij, kot je SIS 1+RE.
According to the Commission proposal the modifications proposed would also cover the case of a switchover from the SIS II project, should it not be completed successfully, to an alternative scenario such as SIS1+ RE.
Komisija zato predlaga spremembo člena 4 in člena 10(3) instrumentov ter uvedbo načela „v potrebnem obsegu“.
To this end the Commission suggests to modify Article 4 and Article 10 paragraph 3 of the instruments and to introduce the formula "to the extent necessary".
Gre za skupino desetih tehničnih strokovnjakov, in sicer osem strokovnjakov iz držav članic in dva uradnika Komisije.
The GPMB is a group of 10 technical experts - 8 from the Member States and 2 Commission officials.
Svet je v svojih sklepih o prihodnji usmerjenosti SIS II z dne 4. in 5. junija 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj okrepi strukturo upravljanja informacijske tehnologije in Odbor za globalno upravljanje programa tesneje vključi v upravljavsko strukturo.
In its conclusions on the further direction of SIS II of 4/5 June 2009 the Council had asked the Commission to enhance the IT management structure and to further integrate the GPMB in the management structure.
Vključitev odbora v pravno podlago bi omogočila tudi, da bi se njegovi upravni in potni stroški financirali iz proračuna Skupnosti.
Its integration in the legal basis would also allow for its administrative costs and travel expenses to be financed from the Community budget.
Parlament je zahteval tudi popolno preglednost v zvezi z izvajanjem procesa SIS II.
Parliament also called for full transparency as regards the implementation process of SIS II.
Preizkusi iz januarja 2010 niso bili zelo uspešni; ocena rezultatov preizkusa še poteka.
The tests in January 2010 were not very successful; the evaluation of the test results is still ongoing.
- glede na resne zamude in prekoračitve stroškov pri projektu SIS II bi morala pravna podlaga določati, da mora vsaka tehnična rešitev temeljiti na najboljši razpoložljivi tehnologiji in biti skladna z merili jasnega časovnega načrta in stroškovno učinkovitostjo;
- Given the serious time delays and cost-overruns in the SIS II project the legal basis should state that any technical solution must be based on the best available technology and comply with the criteria of a clear timetable and cost-effectiveness.
- bistvenega pomena je ohraniti parlamentarni nadzor na procesom migracije: saj je Parlament sozakonodajalec za pravno podlago za SIS II, poleg tega pa ja tudi del proračunskega organa, ki nadzoruje migracijo, ki se financira iz proračuna Skupnosti;
- It is essential to keep the migration process under parliamentary scrutiny: Parliament is the co-legislator for the SIS II legal basis; Parliament also forms part of the budgetary authority, which supervises the migration, financed from the Community budget.
- iz enakih razlogov se Parlament ne bi smelo več izključevati iz postopka odločanja v zvezi z migracijo; pred prehodom na novi sistem bi moral biti Parlament v celoti obveščen o rezultatih testiranj in podati pozitivno mnenje;
- For the same reasons Parliament should no longer be excluded from the decision-making as regards migration; before switching over to the new system Parliament should be fully informed on the test results and issue a favourable opinion.
- ker datum zaključka procesa migracije in tehnična rešitev še nista jasna, mora zakonodajalec zagotoviti veljavnost pravnega okvira za SIS II, ne glede na možne tehnične težave, ki bodo odločale o izbiri končne tehnične rešitve.
- As the date of completion of the migration process and the technical solution are not yet certain, the legislator must ensure that the legal framework intended for SIS II applies, regardless of potential technical problems that will determine the choice of the final technical solution.
Če projekt SIS II ne bo uspešen, si Parlament pridržuje pravico, da pozove Evropsko računsko sodišče, naj opravi podrobno revizijo o upravljanju projekta SIS II in finančnih posledicah za proračun Skupnosti.
In case the SIS II project fails Parliament reserves, itself, the right to invite the European Court of Auditors to carry out an in-depth audit on how the SIS II project was managed and on the financial implications for the Community budget.
Zato je Komisija predložila nova predloga ( KOM(2009)0508 in KOM(2010)0015 ), ki spreminjata pravna instrumenta o migraciji s SIS 1+ na drugo generacijo sistema SIS.
That is why the Commission has submitted the new package of proposals ( COM(2009)0508 and COM(2010)0015 ) amending the two legal instruments relating to the migration from SIS I + to the second-generation SIS.
Da bi SIS II pričel delovati, kot je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklepu 2007/533/PNZ, in v primeru neuspeha pri testiranjih, bi bilo treba predvideti nadomestni scenarij ter vse zainteresirane strani čim prej seznaniti z vsemi finančnimi posledicami.
In order for SIS II to become operational as required by Regulation (EC) 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA and in case of its failure after testing, an alternative scenario should be envisaged and full financial implications made available to all parties concerned as soon as possible.
Stroške razvoja, vzpostavitve, testiranja, migracije, delovanja ter vzdrževanja nacionalnih sistemov krijejo države članice.
The costs of developing, setting up, testing, migrating, operating and maintaining for the national systems are borne by the Member State concerned.
UL L 381, 28.
1 OJ L 381, 28.12.2006, p.
Odločba 2008/839/PNZ
Decision 2008/839/JHA
Člen 17a – odstavek 5
Article 17a – paragraph 5
Te stopijo v veljavo potem, ko generalni direktor pristojnega generalnega direktorata Komisije da pozitivno mnenje.
They shall take effect after a favourable opinion has been given by the Director General of the responsible Directorate-General of the Commission.
Pristojnosti in naloge Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa vključujejo zahtevo po objavljanju rednih poročil in zagotavljanju, da se ta poročila predložijo Evropskemu parlamentu, da se zagotovita popoln parlamentarni nadzor in pregled.
The terms of reference of the GPMB shall include a requirement to publish regular reports and that those reports be made available to the European Parliament in order to ensure full parliamentary scrutiny and oversight.
Člen 17a – odstavek 6
Article 17a – paragraph 6
o stališču Sveta iz prve obravnave z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o navajanju porabe energije in drugih virov izdelkov, ki vplivajo na rabo energije, s pomočjo nalepk in standardiziranih podatkov o izdelku (prenovitev)
on the Council's position at first reading for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products (recast)
Anni Podimata )
Anni Podimata
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta iz prve obravnave (05247/1/2010 – C7-0094/2010 ),
– having regard to the Council's position at first reading (05247/1/2010 – C7‑0094/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu „Dodatek h KOM(2009) 665 konč.“ ( KOM(2010)0147 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled "Addendum to COM(2009) 665 final" ( COM(2010)0147 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 294(7) in 194(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(7) and Article 194(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0345 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0345 . ,
UL C 228, 22.9.2009, str.
OJ C 228, 22.9.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju členov 72 in 37 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 72 and 37 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko za drugo obravnavo ( A7-0128/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7‑0128/2010 ),
Evropska komisija je 17. novembra 2008 Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu na podlagi člena 95 predložila predlog prenovitve direktive o navajanju porabe energije in drugih virov izdelkov, ki vplivajo na rabo energije, s pomočjo nalepk in standardiziranih podatkov o izdelku.
On 17 November 2008, the European Commission submitted a recast proposal for a Directive on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products to the Council and the European Parliament with Art. 95 as legal basis.
Ta predlog skupaj z drugima dvema predlogoma o energetski učinkovitosti stavb (prenovljena direktiva) in o označevanju pnevmatik glede na izkoristek goriva in druge bistvene parametre (predlog uredbe) sestavlja sveženj o energetski učinkovitosti, ki ga je Komisija predstavila novembra 2008.
This proposal together with two other proposals on the energy performance of buildings (recast Directive) and on the labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters (proposal of a Regulation) formed the Energy Efficiency Package tabled by the Commission in November 2008.
Evropski parlament je 5. maja 2009 v prvi obravnavi sprejel stališče in odobril 60 sprememb predloga Komisije.
The European Parliament adopted its opinion in first reading on 5 May 2009 approving 60 amendments to the Commission's proposal.
Po sprejetju stališča Parlamenta iz prve obravnave in ob upoštevanju začetka veljavnosti nove Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije je bil sprejet dvostopenjski pristop, da bi olajšali pogajalski postopek:
Following the adoption of the first reading position of Parliament and in view of the entry into force of the new Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. a two step approach was agreed, in order to facilitate the negotiations procedure:
– Na prvi stopnji je bil dosežen sporazum o vsebini direktive.
- At a first stage reaching agreement on the substance of the Directive.
Ta sporazum je bil sklenjen novembra 2009 ter potrjen s sklepom Coreperja z dne 19. novembra 2009 in pismom predsednika odbora ITRE z dne 2. decembra 2009.
This agreement was concluded in November 2009 and confirmed by means of a Coreper decision on 19 November 2009 and of a letter of ITRE Chairman, dated 2 December 2009.
– Na drugi stopnji je bil dosežen sporazum o spremembah, ki jih prinaša začetek veljavnosti Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti v zvezi s sprejetjem pravne podlage in določb o delegiranih aktih.
- At a second stage reaching agreement on the modifications resulting from the entry into force of the TFEU, concerning notably the adaptation of the legal basis and the provisions on delegated acts.
Ta sporazum je bil sprejet marca 2010 s sklepom Coreperja z dne 24. marca 2010 in pismom predsednika odbora ITRE z dne 25. marca 2010.
This agreement was concluded in March 2010 by means of a Coreper decision on 24 March 2010 and of a letter of ITRE Chairman, dated 25 March 2010.
Rezultat teh pogajanj se kaže v stališču Sveta, ki je bil sestavljen na prvi obravnavi v skladu s členom 294 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in sprejet 14. aprila 2010, in s katerim se je tudi odprla možnost za sporazum na začetku druge obravnave, ki je pomenila odobritev stališča Sveta iz prve obravnave brez predlogov sprememb Parlamenta.
The result of these negotiations formed the Council first reading position in accordance with Article 294 of the TFEU and was adopted on 14 April 2010, thereby, opening the way for an early 2 nd reading agreement, meaning approval of the Council's first reading without amendments by Parliament.
Glavne značilnosti tega sporazuma
The main elements of the agreement
– Nalepka in oblika: sprejeti sporazum je skladen z bistvom stališča Parlamenta po prvi obravnavi (predlog spremembe 70), saj ohranja „lestvico od A do G“, ki se omejuje na tri razrede, ki se lahko dodajo nad stopnjo A – če tako zahteva tehnološki napredek – pri čemer je vseh skupaj lahko največ sedem razredov.
- Label and layout: The agreement reached is in line with the main idea of the Parliament's position after the first reading (am 70), as it maintains the idea of an "A-G scale", restricting to three the number of classes that can be added above A - if required by technological progress - and limiting to seven the total number of classes.
Poleg tega omogoča priložnost, da se pod posebnimi in določenimi pogoji oblikuje nova lestvica.
Moreover it provides the opportunity of rescaling under specific and well-determined conditions.
Nova določba o reviziji od Komisije zahteva, da do konca leta 2014 oceni, ali je treba spremeniti določbe o obliki nalepke glede na tehnološki napredek in potrošnikovo razumevanje oblike nalepke.
The new review clause asks the Commission to assess by the end of 2014 the need for amending the provisions on the label layout in the light of technical evolution and the understanding by consumers of the label layout.