natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kaže, da Komisije ne skrbi število uradnikov, ki se v državah EU ali izven nje ukvarjajo z dostopom na trge (v številčni delegaciji, kot je na primer v Pekingu, predstavljajo trgovinski svetovalci zgolj 7 % zaposlenih).
The Commission apparently is not concerned by the number of officials dealing with market access, either in the EU or in non-EU countries (in a large delegation such as the one based in Beijing, for example, commercial counsellors make up just 7% of the staff).
Veliko v sporočilu omenjenih inovacij zahteva dejavno sodelovanje držav članic.
Many of the innovations mentioned in the communication require the active participation of the Member States.
Če ne bodo sodelovale zavzeto in brez pridržkov, je nova strategija dostopa na trge, ki jo je predstavila Komisija, obsojena na neuspeh.
Unless they participate enthusiastically and without reservations, the new market access strategy outlined by the Commission is doomed to failure.
Zato morajo države članice odločno prevzeti odgovornost in priskrbeti gospodarske in človeške vire, potrebne za uspeh pobude.
Member States must therefore purposefully shoulder their responsibilities and provide the economic and human resources needed for the initiative to succeed.
Do neke mere so ti viri že na voljo, vendar žal premalo izkoriščeni.
Those resources are to some extent already available, but they are woefully underused.
Združevanje nacionalnih trgovinskih virov, redna izmenjava informacij in vzpostavitev učinkovitega omrežja z vsemi, ki podpirajo trgovino (na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni) – vse to so dejavnosti, ki bi lahko spodbujale zunanjo konkurenčnost v vsej Evropi.
Pooling national trade resources, exchanging information on a regular basis, and setting up an effective network with all those involved in support to trade (at national or regional level): all those are actions that could help promoting the external competitiveness of Europe as a whole.
Komisija mora odigrati pomembno vlogo.
The Commission has an important role to play.
Evropa mora nastopati enotno in oblikovati dosleden politični pristop do trgovinskih partnerjev, ki niso naklonjeni odpiranju svojih trgov.
Europe must speak with one voice and work out a consistent political approach to those trading partners which are reluctant to open up their markets.
Naloga Komisije je, da mobilizira sredstva, ki bodo sicer morda zapravljena, ter organizira pobude EU, ne da bi pri tem posegala v vlogo in dolžnosti, ki bi jih morale prevzeti države članice.
The Commission should undertake the task of mobilising resources which might otherwise be squandered and organising EU initiatives, without, however, encroaching on roles and duties that should fall to Member States.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba ustanoviti urad za pritožbe, ki bi pritožbe sprejemal in jih po potrebi predajal nacionalnim organom.
In addition, a ‘complaints office’ should be set up to receive complaints and pass them on, if need be, to the proper national authorities.
Prav tako bi morala Komisija izboljšati komunikacijsko politiko na področju dostopa na trge s seminarji in debatnimi forumi v Bruslju in državah članicah, z boljšimi osnovnimi storitvami (na primer z brošurami ali navodili v vseh evropskih jezikih) ter z usposabljanjem uradnikov in predstavnikov gospodarstva, ki delajo v delovnih skupinah za dostop na trg v državah izven EU ali so odgovorni za dostop na trg v državah članicah.
The Commission should also improve its communication policy where market access is concerned by holding seminars and discussion forums in Brussels and Member States, offering better basic services (for example brochures or instructions in all European languages), and organising training for officials and business representatives serving on market access teams in non-EU countries or responsible for market access in Member States.
Dialog z državami članicami bi moral potekati prek Svetovalnega odbora za dostop na trg, ki bi moral dobiti več pristojnosti za dajanje pobud in usmerjanje.
The dialogue with Member States should be carried on through the Market Access Advisory Committee, which should be given greater powers of initiative and guidance.
Podatkovna zbirka o dostopu na trge je uporabno orodje za pripravo ukrepov proti netarifnim oviram.
The Madb (Market Access Database) is a useful tool for measures to combat non-tariff barriers.
Vendar bi lahko njeno uporabnost še izboljšali, če bi bil sistem uporabniku prijaznejši in če bi ga razširili, tako da bi vanj vključili vsebine in podatke, ki jih potrebujejo poslovneži, ter posebna poglavja o storitvah in javnih naročilih.
Its usefulness could, however, be enhanced by making the system more user-friendly and expanding it to include content and information relevant to businesspeople and special sections on services and public procurement.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba natančno določiti, kateri gospodarski interesi so v igri, kar bi bilo izhodišče za delovanje Komisije, v katerem bi interesi evropskega gospodarstva kot celote morali prevladati nad sicer legitimnimi interesi posameznikov ali posameznih sektorjev.
The Commission should, furthermore, base its action on an accurate assessment of the economic interests at stake, in which the interest of the European economy as a whole should take precedence over the interests – albeit legitimate – of specific individuals and sectors.
Zelo zaželeno bi bilo tudi okrepiti pobude, namenjene MSP, sicer obstaja nevarnost, da bo od pozornosti, ki jo Skupnost ponovno namenja dostopu na trg, koristi imelo zgolj omejeno število močnih, vplivnih gospodarskih sektorjev, ne bodo pa se razširile na podjetja, ki danes še vedno predstavljajo večino evropskega gospodarstva in ki jih bodo omejevalna ravnanja z drugih področij prej prizadela.
It would also be highly desirable to strengthen the initiatives aimed at SMEs: otherwise the danger would be that the benefits of the renewed Community commitment to market access might be confined to a small number of strong, influential economic sectors, without extending to those firms which today still account for most of the European economic fabric and are more likely to be hit by the restrictive practices laid down in other quarters.
EU naj ne bo strah varovati svoje upravičene interese, bodisi z bolj povezano in odločno trgovinsko in diplomatsko politiko bodisi z uporabo sredstev, ki jih zagotavlja STO ali jih predvidevajo regionalni in dvostranski sporazumi (očiten primer je organ STO za reševanje sporov).
The EU must not be afraid to defend its legitimate interests, whether through a more coherent and resolute commercial and diplomatic policy or by employing the means afforded by the WTO or provided for under regional or bilateral agreements (the WTO dispute settlement body being an obvious example).
Nova generacija trgovinskih sporazumov bi morala vključevati zaščitne klavzule, s katerimi bi EU lahko nemudoma odstranila netarifne ovire s kar najmanj stroškov za poslovne subjekte in evropske davkoplačevalce.
The new generation of trade agreements should include safeguard clauses allowing the EU to remove non-tariff barriers without delay and at the lowest possible cost to business operators and European taxpayers.
Uspešen izid pogajanj v Dohi bi lahko privedel do velikih uspehov na področju dostopa na trge.
A successful outcome to the Doha negotiations could have led to breakthroughs in terms of market access.
Ne da bi zanemarila pogajanja o dvostranskih sporazumih z glavnimi evropskimi trgovinskimi partnerji, bi Komisija morala vztrajati pri okvirnem sporazumu s posebnimi pravili, ki bi se lahko uporabila v zadevah, povezanih z netarifnimi ovirami, in za hitro doseganje poravnav ob sporih zaradi neizvrševanja ali neupoštevanja sporazuma.
Without neglecting negotiations on bilateral agreements with Europe’s main trading partners, the Commission should press for a framework agreement whereby specific regulation could be brought to bear on matters related to non-tariff barriers and settlements reached rapidly whenever disputes arose on account of a failure to enforce, or non-compliance with, the agreement.
O nekaterih točkah bi bilo treba bolj poglobljeno razpravljati, tudi o obveznosti držav članic STO, da obveščajo o vseh ukrepih, ki utegnejo ovirati trgovino, ter o ustanovitvi ad hoc arbitražnega organa, ki bi reševal spore in, če je potrebno, dovolil povračilne trgovinske ukrepe.
Some points should have been discussed in more depth, including the obligation for WTO member countries to notify any measures likely to obstruct trade, and the establishment of an ad hoc arbitration body to settle disputes and, where appropriate, authorise retaliatory trade measures.
Še en način, s katerim bi se vpliv netarifnih ovir zmanjšal, je usklajevanje predpisov med državami članicami STO.
Another way to lessen the impact of non-tariff barriers is to harmonise the regulations of WTO member countries.
Napredek, dosežen v čezatlantskem ureditvenem dialogu z ZDA, bi moral Komisijo spodbuditi, da v pobudo vključi še druge trgovinske partnerje.
The progress achieved in the Transatlantic Regulatory Dialogue with the United States should encourage the Commission to bring other trading partners within the scope of this initiative.
Prizadevanja za odpravo trgovinskih ovir pa so nazadnje odvisna tudi od boljšega mednarodnega posvetovanja.
Finally, the efforts to combat barriers to trade depend on better international consultation.
Zagotavljanje odprtih trgov, ki jih vodi konkurenčnost, pomaga svetovnemu gospodarstvu v celoti, ne glede na sedež proizvajalcev blaga ali ponudnikov storitev.
Securing competition-driven open markets helps the entire world economy, no matter where producers of goods and services might be based.
Načelo velja tako znotraj EU (evropske družbe bi morale tesneje sodelovati med seboj) kot izven nje za države, ki z EU delijo trgovinske interese.
This principle holds good both within the EU (European societies should cooperate more closely among themselves) and outside, for countries sharing the same trading interests.
Parlament ima pri oblikovanju prednostnih nalog EU na področju trgovine ključno vlogo.
Parliament has a key role to play in shaping the EU’s trading priorities.
Zaključki in priporočila
Conclusions and recommendations
Nova strategija dostopa na trge, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, je pomemben korak naprej, vendar ne zadostuje.
The new market access strategy outlined by the Commission marks a significant step forward, but it is not enough.
Komisija je zaslužna za ponovno odprtje razprave o dostopu na trge, vendar mora skupaj z državami članicami narediti več, predvsem pa biti drznejša, če namerava s to pobudo doseči uspeh.
The Commission has had the merit of reopening the market access debate, but, together with the Member States, it has to do more, and above all be bolder, if it intends to make a success of this initiative.
Zato je treba sporočilo razširiti in vanj vključiti nove ideje in prispevke, ki jih narekujejo potrebe gospodarstva in pridobljene izkušnje.
The communication must accordingly be ‘fleshed out’ to encompass new ideas and the new input required in the light both of business needs and of experience on the ground.
Delovne skupine za dostop na trg in podatkovna zbirka o dostopu na trge ne morejo uspeti v državah izven EU, če jih Komisija in nacionalne vlade ne bodo podprle in če ne bodo dokazale, da evropski industriji nudijo uporabno storitev.
The market access teams and the Madb in non-EU countries cannot succeed unless they are given the necessary backing by the Commission and national governments and prove capable of offering a real service to European industry.
Evropskim podjetjem, zlasti MSP, je treba omogočiti, da izkoristijo storitve Komisije, to pa se bo zgodilo z učinkovitejšo informacijsko politiko in bolj v celoti razvito nacionalno in regionalno podporo.
European businesses, especially SMEs, must be put in a position to take advantage of the Commission’s services, and the way to make that happen lies in a more effective information policy and more fully developed national and regional support.
Nedvomno je treba okrepiti zunanje vidike sporočila.
The external aspects of the communication undoubtedly need to be strengthened.
Poleg smotrnejše rabe sredstev, ki so že na voljo, je treba poskrbeti za nove večstranske ali dvostranske instrumente (tako znotraj STO kot s sklenitvijo sporazumov o prosti trgovini ali o partnerstvu in sodelovanju), s katerimi bo mogoče odstraniti netarifne ovire in z učinkovitimi ukrepi izkoreniniti zlorabe.
In addition to more purposeful use of the means already available, new multilateral or bilateral instruments need to be provided (respectively in the WTO and by concluding free trade or partnership and cooperation agreements) so as to enable non-tariff barriers to be removed and effective action taken to stamp out abuses.
Zaželeno bi bilo tudi bolj usklajeno sodelovanje z drugimi industrializiranimi državami, vzpostavitev ureditvenih dialogov in postopno usklajevanje tehničnih in zdravstvenih predpisov, ne da bi se s tem zmanjšala zaščita, zagotovljena evropskim državljanom.
It would also be desirable to work in closer coordination with other industrialised countries, establish regulatory dialogues, and gradually harmonise technical and health regulations, without weakening the protection afforded to European citizens.
o strategiji EU za olajšanje dostopa na trge evropskim podjetjem
on the EU's strategy to deliver market access for European companies
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. maja 2007 z naslovom Globalna Evropa – zunanji vidiki konkurenčnosti
- having regard to its resolution of 22 May 2007 on Global Europe - External aspects of competitiveness
A. ker je za izpolnjevanje ciljev spremenjene lizbonske strategije potrebno, da gospodarske panoge v Evropski uniji dosežejo in ohranjajo stabilne konkurenčne položaje na svetovnih trgih,
A. whereas meeting the objectives of the revised Lisbon Agenda requires industries in the European Union to develop and sustain stable competitive positions in the global markets,
B. ker je ta konkurenčnost, zlasti konkurenčnost malih in srednje velikih podjetjih, vedno bolj odvisna od raziskav, razvoja, inovacij in intelektualne lastnine,
B. whereas this competitiveness, especially for SMEs, increasingly relies on research, development, innovation and intellectual property,
C. ker sta osnovna pogoja za konkurenčnost varna in zanesljiva oskrba z energijo ter neoviran dostop podjetij EU do najsodobnejših informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij,
C. whereas two prerequisites of this competitiveness are a safe and secure energy supply on the one hand and unimpeded access for EU businesses to state-of-the-art information and communication technologies on the other,
D. ker lahko EU kot integriran trg ali kot mednarodna organizacija s svojim strokovnim znanjem in pogajalsko močjo učinkovito prispeva k prizadevanjem podjetij EU, da vstopijo na trge tretjih držav,
D. whereas the EU, both as an integrated market and as an international organisation, can effectively contribute with its expertise and negotiating power to the efforts of EU businesses to access third country markets,
o akcijskem načrtu za energetsko učinkovitost: uresničitev možnosti
on an Action Plan for Energy Efficiency: Realising the Potential
PE 390.513v02-00
PE 390.513v01-00
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.............................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION.......................................3
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..........................22
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ....24
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ............26
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 28
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ...........................................................30
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..........................32
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...........................................................34
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.................................................................36
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. oktobra 2006 z naslovom Akcijski načrt za energetsko učinkovitost: uresničitev možnosti ( KOM(2006)0545 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 19 October 2006 entitled 'Action Plan for Energy Efficiency: Realising the Potential' ( COM(2006)0545 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije ( SEC(2006)1173 ), ki je priloženo zgoraj omenjenemu sporočilu Komisije z dne 19. oktobra 2006,
– having regard to the Commission staff working document ( SEC(2006)1173 ) accompanying the above-mentioned Commission Communication of 19 October 2006,
– ob upoštevanju ocene učinka akcijskega načrta ( SEC(2006)1174 ) in povzetka ( SEC(2006)1175 ),
– having regard to the impact assessment of the Action Plan ( SEC(2006)1174 ), and the executive summary ( SEC(2006)1175 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. januarja 2007 z naslovom Energetska politika za Evropo ( KOM(2007)0001 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 10 January 2007 entitled 'An Energy Policy for Europe' ( COM(2007)0001 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta z dne 8. in 9. marca 2007 o potrditvi Akcijskega načrta Evropskega sveta (2007–2009) – Energetska politika za Evropo (7224/07),
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council of 8 and 9 March 2007 concerning the Council's endorsement of a 'European Council Action Plan (2007-2009) - Energy Policy for Europe' (7224/07),
1 UL L 297, 13.10.1992, str.
1 OJ L 297, 13.10.1992, p.
2 UL L 1, 4.1.2003, str.
2 OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p.
3 UL L 52, 21.2.2004, str.
3 OJ L 52, 21.2.2004, p.50. ,
4 UL L 191, 22.7.2005, str.
4 OJ L 191, 22.7.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2006 o učinkovitosti rabe končne energije in o energetskih storitvah
– having regard to Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on energy end-use efficiency and energy services
1 UL L 114, 27.4.2006, str.
1 OJ L 114, 27.4.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2006/1005/ES z dne 18. decembra 2006 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med vlado Združenih držav Amerike in Evropsko skupnostjo o usklajevanju programov za označevanje energetske učinkovitosti pisarniške opreme
– having regard to Council Decision 2006/1005/EC of 18 December 2006 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the European Community on the coordination of energy-efficiency labelling programmes for office equipment
2 UL L 381, 28.12.2006, str.
2 OJ L 381, 28.12.2006, p.
24. in besedila zgoraj omenjenega sporazuma
24. and to the text of the above-mentioned agreement
UL L 381, 28.12.2006, str.
OJ L 381, 28.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o programu Skupnosti za označevanje energetske učinkovitosti pisarniške opreme ( KOM(2006)0576 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community energy-efficiency labelling programme for office equipment ( COM(2006)0576 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1639/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o ustanovitvi Okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (2007–2013)
– having regard to Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013)
4 UL L 310, 9.11.2006, str.
4 OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p.
15. , zlasti poglavja III iz naslova II o programu Inteligentna energija – Evropa,
15. and in particular its Chapter III of Title II thereof, concerning the Intelligent Energy-Europe Programme,
5 UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str.
5 O J L 412, 30.12.2006, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1791/2006 (UL L 363, 20.12.2006, str.
Regulation last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. junija 2006 o energetski učinkovitosti ali "Narediti več z manj" – zelena knjiga
– having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on Energy efficiency or doing more with less - Green Paper
7 UL C 298 E, 8.12.2006, str.
7 OJ C 298 E, 8.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. decembra 2006 o evropski strategiji za trajnostno, konkurenčno in varno energijo – zelena knjiga
– having regard to its resolution of 14 December 2006 on a European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy – Green Paper
8 UL C 317 E, 23.12.2006, str.
8 OJ C 317 E, 23.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0003/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0003/2008 ),
A. ker bo zvišanje globalnih temperatur za več kot 2 ºC nad temperaturo iz časa pred industrijsko revolucijo povzročilo kaotične spremembe podnebja, kot je bilo med drugim navedeno v poročilu Medvladnega foruma za spremembo podnebja maja 2007; ker je potrebno drastično zmanjšanje emisij ogljika do leta 2015, če naj bi bila rast globalne temperature nižja od 2 ºC; ker je učinkovita uporaba energije najkrajša in stroškovno najučinkovitejša pot za zmanjšanje ogljikovih emisij;
A. whereas chaotic climate change will result if global temperatures rise by more than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, as is attested to by, inter alia , the May 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; whereas drastic cuts in carbon emissions are necessary by 2015 if the rise in global temperatures is to be kept to no more than 2 degrees Celsius; whereas using energy more efficiently is the most immediate and most cost-effective way of reducing carbon emissions;
B. ker ima energetska učinkovitost ključno vlogo pri zmanjšanju odvisnosti Evropske unije od uvoza energije, pri soočanju s prihodnjim pomanjkanjem virov energije in pri omejevanju vpliva pretresov zaradi sprememb cene energije;
B. whereas energy efficiency has a crucial role to play in reducing the European Union's dependency on energy imports, in tackling the future penury of energy sources and in limiting the effect of energy price shocks;
D. ker je Direktivo 2002/91/ES ustrezno preneslo zgolj pet držav članic;
D. whereas Directive 2002/91/EC has been properly transposed by only five Member States;
E. ker Direktiva 2006/32/ES zahteva, da države članice predložijo nacionalne akcijske načrte za energetsko učinkovitost Komisiji do 30. junija 2007; ker je do 1. septembra 2007 Komisija prejela zgolj devet nacionalnih akcijskih načrtov za energetsko učinkovitost in do 30. oktobra 2007 še vedno zgolj petnajst;
E. whereas Directive 2006/32/EC requires Member States to submit a National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP) to the Commission by 30 June 2007; whereas by 1 September 2007 the Commission had received only nine NEEAPs, and by 30 October 2007 still only fifteen NEEAPs;
F. ker države članice Direktivo 2004/8/ES na mednarodnem trgu izvajajo z zamudo in pomanjkljivo;
F. whereas implementation by the Member States of Directive 2004/8/EC is late and far from perfect on the international market;
G. ker je Evropska unija ena izmed najbogatejših in tehnološko najnaprednejših regij na svetu; ker je Evropska unija od leta 1990 povečala svojo gospodarsko proizvodnjo za skoraj 40 % in povprečen prihodek na prebivalca za tretjino; ker se je v istem obdobju povpraševanje po energiji in virih električne energije povečalo za samo 11 %;
G. whereas the European Union is one of the richest and most technologically advanced regions of the world; whereas the European Union has expanded its economic output by nearly 40% and average per capita income by a third since 1990;whereas, over the same period, demand for energy and power resources grew by only 11%;