natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Koriščenje evropskih in nacionalnih finančnih sredstev, ki so na voljo za projekte, ki vključujejo raziskave, razvoj in inovacije, ni enotno, kar pomeni, da je treba povečati upravne zmogljivosti na regionalni ravni, da bo mogoče najti nove rešitve za sedanje težave.
The take‑up of the European and national financial resources available for projects involving research, development and innovation is not uniform, meaning there is a need to increase administrative capacity at the regional level so that fresh solutions can be pinpointed to current problems.
Poročevalec meni, da se bodo lahko regije potem, ko bo uresničen cilj, da se zagotovi podobna kakovost življenja z zagotavljanjem dostopa do infrastrukture in kakovostnih storitev, osredotočile na ukrepe, namenjene razvoju lokalnih gospodarskih zmogljivosti, pri čemer sta pomembna stopnja razvoj lokalnih politik raziskav, razvoja in inovacij ter primerna regionalna infrastruktura.
Your rapporteur takes the view that once the objective has been met of ensuring a similar quality of life by enabling access to infrastructure and quality services, the regions can concentrate on measures aimed at developing local economic potential, with an important stage being the development of local research, development and innovation policies and the appropriate regional infrastructure.
o mednarodni trgovinski politiki v okviru zahtev glede podnebnih sprememb
on international trade policy in the context of climate change imperatives
Poročevalec: Yannick Jadot
Rapporteur: Yannick Jadot
Jo Leinen , Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
Jo Leinen , Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
(*) Pridruženi odbori: – Člen 50 poslovnika
(*) Associated committees - Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................17
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (*) 17
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................21
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................25
– ob upoštevanju poročil treh delovnih skupin medvladne skupine strokovnjakov za podnebne spremembe, objavljenih leta 2007
– having regard to the reports of the three working groups of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in 2007
– ob upoštevanju svežnja ukrepov za boj proti podnebnim spremembam, ki ga je 17. decembra 2008 sprejel Evropski svet,
– having regard to the Climate Change Package adopted by the European Council on 17 December 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z zasedanja 29. in 30. oktobra 2009 o pogajanjih o podnebju,
– having regard to the Conclusions of the European Council of 29-30 October 2009 relating to climate negotiations,
– ob upoštevanju vrhunskega srečanja OZN o podnebju v Københavnu (Danska) od 7. do 18. decembra 2009 ter o sporazumu s tega srečanja,
– having regard to the UN climate summit held in Copenhagen (Denmark) from 7 to 18 December 2009, and the resulting Copenhagen Agreement,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnih resolucij Parlamenta o podnebnih spremembah, zlasti resolucije z dne 10. februarja 2010 o rezultatih vrhunskega srečanja v Københavnu
– having regard to Parliament's previous resolutions regarding climate change, and in particular those of 10 February 2010 on the outcome of the Copenhagen summit
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0019 . ter resolucije z dne 29. novembra 2007 o trgovini in podnebnih spremembah
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0019 . , and of 29 November 2007 on trade and climate change
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. maja 2010 o analizi možnosti, da se preseže ciljno 20-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov ter oceni tveganja selitve industrijskih virov toplogrednih plinov izven EU ( KOM(2010)0265 );
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 26 May 2010 on the analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage ( COM(2010)0265 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije z dne 19. junija 2010 o trajnosti biogoriv in drugih tekočih biogoriv
– having regard to the Communications from the Commission of 19 June 2010 relating to the sustainability of biofuels and bioliquids
UL C 160, 19.6.2010, str.
OJ C 160, 19.6.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 4. novembra 2008 o pobudi za surovine – zagotavljanje preskrbe z nujno potrebnimi surovinami za rast in delovna mesta v Evropi (KOM(2008) 0699),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 4 November 2008 on the raw materials initiative — meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe ( COM(2008)0699 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Svetovne trgovinske organizacije in programa Združenih narodov za okolje "Trgovina in podnebne spremembe" z dne 26. junija 2008,
– having regard to the World Trade Organization and United Nations Environment Programme report on trade and climate change launched on 26 June 2008,
– ob upoštevanju končne izjave voditeljev držav in vlad na vrhunskem srečanju skupine G 20 24. in 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu,
– having regard to the final declaration by heads of State and Government at the G20 Pittsburgh Summit on 24 and 25 September 2009,
– ob upoštevanju študije instituta Climate Strategies "Tackling leakage in a world of unequal carbon prices", objavljene junija leta 2010
– having regard to the Climate Strategies institute's study entitled ‘Tackling leakage in a world of unequal carbon prices’ published in June 2010
Susanne Droege in Simone Cooper, Tackling Leakage in a World of Unequal Carbon Prices - A study for the Greens/EFA Group, http://www.climatestrategies.org/our-reports/category/32/257.html. , študije instituta CE Delft "Why the EU could and should adopt higher greenhouse gas reduction targets", objavljene marca leta 2010
Susanne Droege and Simone Cooper, Tackling Leakage in a World of Unequal Carbon Prices - A study for the Greens/EFA Group, http://www.climatestrategies.org/our-reports/category/32/257.html. ; the CE Delft institute's study ‘Why the EU could and should adopt higher greenhouse gas reduction targets’, published in March 2010
Sander de Bruyn, Agnieszka Markowska, and Marc Davidson, Why the EU could and should adopt higher greenhouse gas reduction targets - A literature review , Delft 2010, http://www.stopclimatechange.net/fileadmin/bali/user_upload/docs/7213_finalreportSdB.pdf. , študije instituta Sandbag "The Carbon Rich List: The companies profiting from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme", objavljene februarja leta 2010
Sander de Bruyn, Agnieszka Markowska, and Marc Davidson, Why the EU could and should adopt higher greenhouse gas reduction targets - A literature review , Delft 2010, http://www.stopclimatechange.net/fileadmin/bali/user_upload/docs/7213_finalreportSdB.pdf. ; the Sandbag institute's study, ‘The Carbon Rich List: The companies profiting from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme’, published in February 2010
Anna Pearson, The Carbon Rich List: The companies profiting from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme , Company analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme compiled in association with carbonmarketdata.com, februar 2010, http://www.climnet.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&Itemid=55&gid=1551. , in študije instituta Carbon Trust "International carbon flows",
Anna Pearson, The Carbon Rich List : The companies profiting from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme , Company analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme compiled in association with carbonmarketdata.com, February 2010, http://www.climnet.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&Itemid=55&gid=1551. , and the Carbon Trust institute’s study, ‘International carbon flows’,
– ob upoštevanju mednarodne ocene agronomske znanosti in tehnologije za razvoj, objavljene v letu 2008
– having regard to the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development published in 2008
– ob upoštevanju pravil energetske listine, na katerih temelji primer "Vattenfall Europe Generation AG proti Zvezni republiki Nemčiji" z dne 27. aprila 2009
– having regard to the rules on investment in the Energy Charter, which are behind the case of ‘Vattenfall Europe Generation AG v. Federal Republic of Germany of 27 April 2009
Mednarodni center za reševanje investicijskih sporov, ICSID primer št.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, ICSID Case No.
ARB/09/6 , v katerem je podjetje sprožilo postopek proti državi članici zaradi strožjih okoljevarstvenih pravil,
ARB/09/6 in which a company attacks a Member State imposing stricter environmental rules,
– ob upoštevanju zakona dežele Ontario o zeleni energiji z dne 14. maja 2009
– having regard to the Ontario Green Energy Act of 14 May 2009
Ministrstvo za energijo dežele Ontario, zakon o zeleni energiji, http://www.mei.gov.on.ca/en/energy/gea/ ,
Ontario Ministry of Energy, Green Energy Act, http://www.mei.gov.on.ca/en/energy/gea/ ,
- ob upoštevanju evropskega akcijskega načrta FLEGT (Action Plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade) z maja 2003,
- having regard to the EU FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade) Action Plan of May 2003,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ter mnenj Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost ter Odbora za razvoj ( A7–0310/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinions of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Development ( A7‑0310/2010 ),
A. ker se je temperatura na Zemlji v zadnjem stoletju povišala in se bo še naprej višala ter ker so gospodarske, socialne in okoljske posledice podnebnega segrevanja že dobile zaskrbljujoče razsežnosti in ker je treba segrevanje omejiti na manj kot 2°C,
A. whereas the Earth’s temperature has already increased over the last century and will continue to increase and whereas the economic, social and ecological repercussions of global warming are assuming worrying proportions and it is vital to limit this warming to less than 2°C,
B. ker je dogovor, sprejet na vrhunskem srečanju OZN o podnebju v Københavnu v decembru 2009, neustrezen; ker Evropska unija ni uspela prevzeti vodilne vloge, saj ni imela ambicioznih ciljev in ni nastopila enotno,
B. whereas the agreement reached at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in December 2009 is inadequate; whereas the European Union did not manage to play a leading role because its objectives lacked ambition and it failed to present a united front,
C. ker je dogovor, sprejet na vrhunskem srečanju OZN o podnebju v Københavnu v decembru 2009, neustrezen in vreden razočaranja; ker pogajalske partnerice niso uspele doseči splošnega soglasja, Evropska unija pa ni uspela prevzeti vodilne vloge in nastopiti enotno;
C. whereas the agreement reached at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in December 2009 is inadequate and disappointing; whereas the negotiating partners did not manage to reach global consensus, and the European Union did not manage to assume a leading role and failed to present a united front;
D. pozdravlja, da je Evropski svet pokazal ambicijo, da do leta 2050 zmanjša evropske emisije toplogrednih plinov za 80 do 95 % glede na leto 1990, kar je potrebno, če želi Unija ponovno prevzeti vodstvo kot mednarodna velesila na področju podnebja, saj so se druge države močno potrudile na področju okolju prijaznega gospodarstva, zlasti prek svojih načrtov za ponovni gospodarski zagon; močno podpira cilj, da se do leta 2020 zmanjšajo evropske emisije za 30 % ne glede na izid mednarodnih dogovorov,
D. welcoming the European Council’s goal of reducing European greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared with their 1990 levels, this target being necessary for the EU to regain its leading role in international climate initiatives, as other countries have made strong commitments to developing a green economy, notably through their economic recovery plans; strongly supporting the objective of cutting European emissions by 30% by 2020, regardless of the outcome of international negotiations,
E. ker vrhunsko srečanje v Cancunu ponuja enkratno priložnost za vsebinski dialog in bi morali v njegovem okviru sprejeti pravno zavezujoče instrumente ter veliko zanesljivejše postopke preverjanja, prav tako bi to srečanje moralo biti pomemben korak k celovitemu in pravno zavezujočemu operativnemu sporazumu, ki bo omogočil omejitev globalnega segrevanja krepko pod 2°C,
E. whereas the Cancun Summit provides a unique opportunity for a substantive dialogue, should adopt legally binding instruments and much stronger verification procedures and should be a key step towards a comprehensive and legally binding operational agreement to help keep global warming well below 2°C, ,
F. ker je boj proti podnebnim spremembam konkurenčni dejavnik, saj sta evropski prednostni nalogi na tem področju varčevanje z energijo ter energija iz obnovljivih virov, ki bosta izboljšali zanesljivo oskrbo Unije z energijo in imata velik potencial za gospodarski razvoj, inovacije, regionalni razvoj in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest,
F. whereas combating climate change is a factor in competitiveness, with Europe's priorities being energy savings and renewable energies that help improve EU energy security and offer major potential in terms of industrial development, innovation, regional development and job creation,
G. ker so nekatere države z energetskimi subvencijami in brez omejitev emisij ogljikovega dioksida v ugodnejšem položaju,
G. whereas subsidised energy and unrestricted CO2 emission in certain countries create a comparative advantage,
H. ker se odgovornost Evropske unije do podnebja ne more omejiti le na omejevanje emisij toplogrednih plinov na njenem ozemlju, saj so emisije, vezane na njeno porabo, mnogo višje od tistih, vezanih na njeno proizvodnjo, in sicer glede na nedavne ocene 35 % v Združenem kraljestvu, 45 % v Franciji in 60 % na Švedskem,
H. whereas the European Union's climate responsibility cannot be limited to greenhouse gas emissions on its own territory, as recent estimates put consumption-related emissions well in excess of production-related emissions, with figures of around 35% for the United Kingdom, 45% for France or 60% for Sweden,
2. poziva k sprejetju mednarodno obvezujočega sporazuma o varstvu podnebja in izrecno podpira cilj za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 v EU za 30 % do leta 2020, in sicer neodvisno od mednarodnih pogajanj, in dolgoročni cilj EU za zmanjšanje CO2 in ostalih toplogrednih plinov za najmanj 85 % do leta 2050;
Calls for the conclusion of an internationally binding agreement on climate protection and strongly supports the objective of a 30% reduction in CO2 emissions in the EU by 2020, irrespective of international negotiations, and the long-term EU objective of reducing emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases by at least 85% by 2050;
4. trdi, da bi bilo treba spodbujanje obnovljivih energij okrepiti povsod, kjer si vlade držav članic prizadevajo za dosledno politiko in vzpostavijo zavezujoč pravni okvir, ki dolgoročno omogoča sprejetje stopenjskega programa pomoči, ki prispevajo k odprtju trga in vzpostavitvi minimalne infrastrukture, kar je bistvenega pomena v času krize in poslovne negotovosti;
Advocates stepping up the promotion of renewable energies and that Member State governments follow a consistent policy and establish a binding legal framework enabling the adoption, in the long term, of a phased programme of aid contributing to market opening and to the creation of minimal infrastructures, an element which is essential at a time of crisis and business uncertainty;
6. poudarja, da je trgovinska politika Evropske unije na dvostranski, večstranski in mnogostranski ravni sredstvo in ne sama sebi namen, da mora biti skladna s cilji boja proti podnebnim spremembam ter vnaprej delovati v skladu s sklepi ambicioznega dogovora o podnebju;
Stresses that the European Union’s trade policies – whether bilateral or multilateral – are a means to an end and not an end in themselves, and that these should be consistent with its objectives to combat climate change and should anticipate the conclusion of an ambitious climate agreement;
9. poudarja, ob upoštevanju preambule Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) in členov (b), (d) in (g) Splošnega sporazuma o tarifah in trgovini (GATT), da mednarodna trgovina ne sme voditi v izkoriščanje naravnih virov, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj okrepijo načelo skupne preference v okviru STO, posebno z ozirom na trajnostne, podnebju prijazne in etično neoporečne izdelke;
Stresses, with reference to the Preamble to the WTO Agreement and Article XX (b), (d) and (g) of the GATT, that international trade must not result in the over-exploitation of natural resources, and calls on the Commission and Member States to do more to apply the principle of collective preference under the auspices of the WTO, particularly as regards sustainable, climate-friendly and ethically sound products;
12. ker je od marakeškega sklepa ministrov članic WTO o trgovini in okolju 15. aprila 1994 minilo že več kot 15 let, poziva Komisijo, naj Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu najkasneje do polovice 2011 predstavi poročilo, v katerem bo ocenila, v kolikšni meri je odbor WTO za trgovino in okolje izpolnil obveze iz tega sklepa ter kaj je po njenem mnenju še treba storiti, zlasti v zvezi z globalnim dialogom o blaženju podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanju nanje ter WTO;
Given that it is more than 15 years since the WTO Ministerial Decision on Trade and Environment, taken at Marrakesh on 15 April 1994, calls on the Commission to present at the latest by mid-2011 to the European Parliament and the Council a report assessing the extent to which the WTO’s Committee on Trade and Environment has fulfilled its remit as set out in that Decision and its conclusions as to what more needs to be done, particularly in the context of the global dialogue on Climate Change mitigation and adaptation and the WTO;
Krepiti pozitivno interakcijo med trgovino in varstvom okolja
Stronger positive interaction between trade and climate protection
17. upa, da bo EU delovala kot zgled in bo zmanjšala ovire, kot so carine in druge dajatve, za trgovanje z zelenimi tehnologijami ter okolju in podnebju prijaznimi izdelki ter da bo na podlagi akcijskega načrta z Balija in københavnskega zelenega podnebnega sklada spodbujala okoljske dobrine in storitve;
Hopes that the EU will set a good example, by removing obstacles such as tariffs and levies to trade in ‘green’ technologies and environmentally sound and climate-friendly products and promoting ‘environmental goods and services’ (EGS), including on the basis of the Bali Action Plan and the Copenhagen Green Climate Fund;
23. nasprotuje subvencioniranju fosilnih goriv in poziva k večji podpori okolju prijaznim in obnovljivim energijam in k raziskavam ter razvoju decentraliziranih energijskih virov, posebno v državah v razvoju; v zvezi s tem opozarja na sporazum G20 o postopni opustitvi subvencij za fosilna goriva in poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predloge za evropsko strategijo, ki bi to izvajala, in jasen časovni razpored ter po potrebi kompenzacijske mehanizme;
Opposes subsidies for fossil fuels and calls for greater support for environmentally sound renewable energies and the identification and development of decentralised energy sources, particularly in developing countries; in this context, recalls the G20 agreement to phase out fossil fuel subsidies and calls for the Commission to make proposals for a European strategy for its implementation with clear timelines and compensation mechanisms where appropriate;
24. opozarja, da lahko liberalizacija izmenjav škoduje varstvu podnebja, če nekatere države iz neaktivnosti na podnebnem področju naredijo konkurenčno prednost; predlaga torej reformo protidampiških pravil WTO zaradi vključitve vprašanja pravične okoljske cene glede na svetovna merila za varstvo podnebja;
Notes that trade liberalisation can conflict with climate protection if certain countries seek a competitive advantage by failing to act on climate issues; suggests, therefore, a reform of the WTO anti-dumping rules to include the issue of a fair environmental price in accordance with global climate protection standards;
26. vseeno ugotavlja, da pogajanja o podnebju temeljijo na načele skupne, a različne odgovornosti, ter da se slabost podnebne politke v državah v razvoju na splošno razlaga z manjšo finančno ali tehnološko sposobnostjo in ne kot okoljski damping;
Notes, however, that climate negotiations are based on the principle of ‘shared but differentiated responsibility’ and that the weakness of climate policies in developing countries is generally explained by their more limited financial or technological capacities and not by any environmental dumping goals;
29. poudarja, da ne obstaja enotna rešitev za vse gospodarske sektorje, občutljive na selitev virov CO2, ter da sta narava proizvoda ali struktura trga bistveni merili za izbiro razpoložljivih sredstev (brezplačna dodelitev kvot, državna pomoč ali poravnave na mejah);
Emphasises that there is no single solution for industrial sectors that are vulnerable to carbon leakage, and that the nature of the product or the structure of the market are essential criteria for choosing between the tools available (free allocation of allowances, State aid or border adjustment measures);
32. priznava, da pravila WTO ne nasprotujejo mejnim ukrepom za nevtralizacijo učinka domačih politik, ki vključujejo stroške okoljskih dejavnikov v ceno proizvoda, dokler te izravnave niso diskriminacijske;
Recognises that WTO rules are not incompatible with border measures to neutralise the effect of domestic policies incorporating the cost of environmental externalities into the prices of products, as long as such adjustments are not discriminatory;
Spodbujanje razlikovanja med proizvodi glede na njihov vpliv na podnebje
Promoting product differentiation according to their impact on the climate
38. poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za ponovni začetek razprave znotraj WTO o proizvodnih postopkih in metodah ter možnosti, da se podobni proizvodi ločijo glede na njihov ogljični in energetski odtis ali glede na tehnološka merila; meni, da bi države članice WTO lahko sprejele tako pobudo, če bi jo spremljali še ukrepi za lažji prenos tehnologij;
Calls on the Commission to take steps to re-launch discussions within the WTO on PPMs and the possibility of differentiating similar products in terms of their carbon footprint, energy footprint or technological standards; considers that such an initiative might be accepted by WTO members if it were accompanied by measures facilitating technology transfer;
40. poudarja, da si je treba prizadevati za to, da se bodo škodljivi vplivi na okolje, ki so posledica trgovine, odražali v cenah in da se bo izvajalo načelo „onesnaževalec plača“; poziva k uskladitvi sistemov označevanja in informiranja v zvezi z okoljskimi standardi;
Stresses that efforts must be made to ensure that adverse environmental effects resulting from trade are reflected in prices and that the ‘polluter pays’ principle is enforced; urges that the labelling and information systems regarding environmental standards be synchronised;
Liberalizacija izmenjav ne sme ogroziti ambiciozne politike o podnebju
Trade liberalisation must not be at the cost of ambitious climate policies
50. je proti določbam, ki v trgovinskih in naložbenih sporazumih omogočajo, da se vlagatelji odvrnejo od držav, ki krepijo podnebno politiko; meni, da je treba predvideti taka pravila za reševanje sporov med vlagateljem in državo, ki bodo državi omogočala, da v točno določenem pravnem okviru sprejme varovalne ukrepe za okolje, skladne s svetovnimi cilji na tem področju;
Opposes provisions in trade and investment agreements which allow investors to turn against a country that adopts more stringent climate policies; considers that the rules on settling disputes between an investor and a State should only be invoked if a specific legal framework allows the country to take environmental protection measures that are consistent with global objectives in the field;