natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(4) Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se pri zaključku nezakonitega bivanja ukrepi izvedejo na podlagi poštenih in transparentnih postopkov , vendar je treba najprej ukrepati pri viru in preprečiti nujnost nezakonita vstopa (ob odsotnosti zakonitih poti vstopa) .
(4) Member States should ensure that the ending of illegal stay is carried out through a fair and transparent procedure ; however, action should first be taken at source to prevent entry from being gained illegally as a matter of necessity (in the absence of legal channels of entry ).
Zakonska ureditev je le začasen ukrep, ki se sprejme v primeru izrednih razmer kot del nacionalne politike priseljevanja.
Regularisation is only an ad hoc measure taken in response to emergency situations as part of national immigration policies.
To ni dolgoročna rešitev širšega problema, s katerim se z evropskega vidika spopada politika priseljevanja.
It is not a long-term solution to a broader problem, namely that of migration policies viewed from a European perspective.
Predlog spremembe izhaja iz potrebe po jasnejši opredelitvi dejanskih razmer sedanjega pristopa držav članic do priseljevanja.
The above addition stems from the need to identify more clearly the realities of the Member States' current approach to immigration.
(5) Kot splošno načelo bi se moral uporabljati usklajeni postopek v dveh korakih, ki kot prvi korak vključuje odločitev o vrnitvi in kot drugi korak po potrebi izdajo odredbe o odstranitvi.
(5) As a general principle, a harmonised two-step procedure should be applied, involving a return decision as a first step and, where necessary, the issuing of a removal order as a second step.
Vendar bi morali državam članicam omogočiti, da izdajajo odločitev o vrnitvi in odredbo o odstranitvi v okviru enega akta ali odločbe, da bi se izognili možnim zamudam pri postopkih .
However, in order to avoid possible procedural delays, Member States should be allowed to issue both a return decision and a removal order within a single act or decision .
Vendar bi morali državam članicam v izogib možnih zamud pri postopkih omogočiti, da izdajajo odločitev o vrnitvi in odredbo o odstranitvi istočasno, vendar pa v obliki dveh ločenih aktov oziroma odredb, pri čemer je izvršitev akta oziroma odredbe o odstranitvi odvisna od odložilnega pogoja, in sicer izteka roka za prostovoljno vrnitev.
However, in order to avoid possible procedural delays, Member States should be allowed to issue both a return decision and a removal order simultaneously, but in the form of two separate acts or decisions, the implementation of the act or decision concerning removal being subject to the expiry of the deadline for voluntary return.
Čeprav je iz praktičnih razlogov razumljivo, da sta akt ali odredba o odstranitvi sprejeta istočasno kot akt ali odločitev o vrnitvi, ju je treba nujno ločevati in vztrajati pri pomožnem značaju odstranitve v primerjavi s prostovoljno vrnitvijo.
While it is understandable that for practical reasons the act/decision concerning removal should be taken at the same time as the act/decision concerning return, it is essential to stress the difference between them, and the subsidiary nature of removal in relation to voluntary return.
To razliko je mogoče na enostaven in uresničljiv način prikazati z uradno vsaj dvema aktoma/odredbama, pri čemer za enega/eno izmed njiju velja odložilni pogoj, in sicer iztek roka za prostovoljno vrnitev.
An easy and workable way of making that separation is to have, at least formally, two acts/decisions, one of which is subject to a contingent condition - i.e. expiry of the deadline for voluntary return.
(6) Kjer ni razlogov, zaradi katerih bi lahko verjeli, da bi to spodkopalo namen postopka vračanja, se daje prednost prostovoljnemu vračanju pred prisilnim vračanjem, zagotoviti pa se mora tudi obdobje za prostovoljni odhod.
(6) Where there are no reasons to believe that this would undermine the purpose of a return procedure, voluntary return should be preferred over forced return and a period for voluntary departure should be granted.
(6) Prostovoljni vrnitvi bi se moralo dati prednost pred prisilnim vračanjem, zagotoviti pa bi se moralo tudi obdobje za prostovoljni odhod.
(6) Voluntary return should be preferred over forced return and a period for voluntary departure should be granted.
(10) Učinki nacionalnih ukrepov vračanja bi morali na podlagi uveljavljanja prepovedi ponovnega vstopa, ki preprečuje ponoven vstop na ozemlje vseh držav članic, dobiti evropsko razsežnost.
(10) The effects of national return measures should be given a European dimension by establishing a re-entry ban preventing re-entry into the territory of all the Member States .
(10) Učinki nacionalnih ukrepov vračanja bi morali dobiti evropsko razsežnost.
(10) The effects of national return measures should be given a European dimension by establishing a re-entry ban.
Trajanje prepovedi ponovnega vstopa je treba določiti z upoštevanjem vseh ustreznih okoliščin posameznega primera in običajno naj ne bi prekoračilo 5 let.
The length of the re-entry ban should be determined with due regard to all relevant circumstances of an individual case and should not normally exceed 5 years.
V primerih resne grožnje javnemu redu ali javni varnost bi morali omogočiti državam članicam, da določijo daljšo prepoved ponovnega vstopa.
In cases of serious threat to public policy or public security, Member States should be allowed to impose a longer re-entry ban .
V primerih resne grožnje javnemu redu ali javni varnost lahko države članice določijo prepoved ponovnega vstopa.
In cases of serious threat to public policy or public security, Member States may impose a re-entry ban.
Odločitev o vračanju, in na drugem mestu o odstranitvi, je ustrezna sankcija za nezakonito bivanje državljanov tretjih držav.
The return decision and subsidiary removal order are a sufficient penalty in response to irregularly-staying third-country nationals.
Da bi takšno odločitev spremljala prepoved ponovnega vstopa, pa se zdi razen v izjemnih primerih nesorazmerno.
Apart from exceptional cases, supplementing that decision with a re-entry ban would seem to be out of proportion.
Začasna omejitev prostosti bi se morala uporabiti samo, če je nujno, da se prepreči veliko tveganje pobega in če uporaba manj strogih prisilnih ukrepov ni zadostna.
Temporary custody should only be used if necessary to prevent a serious risk of absconding and if the application of less coercive measures would not be sufficient.
(15) Države članice bi morale imeti hiter dostop do informacij o odločitvah o vrnitvi, odredbah o odstranitvi in prepovedih ponovnega vstopa, ki so jih izdale druge države članice.
(15) Member States should have rapid access to information on return decisions, removal orders and re-entry bans issued by other Member States.
Ta izmenjava informacij bi morala potekati v skladu z [Odločbo/Uredbo … o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije Schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)] glede držav članic, ki so polno udeležene pri izvajanju schengenskega pravnega reda.
This information sharing should take place in accordance with [Decision/Regulation … on the establishment, operation and use of the Second Generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)].
Ta izmenjava informacij , ki temelji na strogem spoštovanju pravice do zasebnosti in varstvu osebnih podatkov, bi morala potekati v skladu z [Odločbo/Uredbo … o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije Schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)] glede držav članic, ki so polno udeležene pri izvajanju schengenskega pravnega reda.
This information sharing , based on strict respect for the right to privacy and the protection of personal data, should take place in accordance with [Decision/Regulation … on the establishment, operation and use of the Second Generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)].
Dostop do teh informacij in njihovo uporabo morajo odobriti sodni organi in morata biti omejena na namene te direktive.
Access to and use of such information should be subject to authorisation from the judicial authorities and limited to the purposes of this Directive .
(17) Države članice bi morale uveljaviti določbe te direktive brez diskriminacije glede na spol, raso, barvo, etnično ali družbeno poreklo, genetske značilnosti, jezik, vero ali prepričanje, politično ali drugo mnenje, pripadnost narodni manjšini, imetje, rod, prizadetost, starost ali spolno usmerjenost.
(17) Member States should give effect to the provisions of this Directive without discrimination on the basis of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinions, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation.
(17) (17) Države članice bi morale uveljaviti določbe te direktive brez diskriminacije glede na spol, raso, barvo, etnično ali družbeno poreklo, genetske značilnosti, jezik, vero ali prepričanje, politično ali drugo mnenje, pripadnost narodni manjšini, imetje, rod, prizadetost, starost ali spolno usmerjenost , in bi se morale izogniti nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju ter dosledno upoštevati mednarodne konvencije ter značilnosti in potrebe vsakega posameznika.
(17) Member States should give effect to the provisions of this Directive without discrimination on the basis of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinions, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation , in full compliance with international conventions and avoiding inhuman and degrading treatment and in a manner reflecting the specific characteristics and needs of each individual.
V okviru te direktive je glede varstva človekovih pravic potrebna večja jasnost.
Greater clarity is required as to the protection of human rights under this directive.
V skladu s tem se mladoletnih oseb v Evropski uniji ali v prostorih, ki jih financira Evropska unija in/ali posamezne države članice, nikoli ne sme pridržati v prostorih za pridržanje ali v okoliščinah, ki omejujejo njihovo svobodo.
Accordingly, minors may never, in the European Union or in places funded by the European Union and/or by any Member State, be held in detention facilities or under conditions in which their freedom is restricted.
(19) Uporaba te direktive ne posega v obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Ženevske konvencije, ki se nanaša na status beguncev z dne 28. julija 1951, kakor je bila spremenjena z Newyorškim protokolom z dne 31. januarja 1967.
(19) Application of this Directive is without prejudice to the obligations resulting from the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967.
V skladu s tem je prepovedana vsaka oblika prisilnega pridržanja beguncev, državljanov tretjih držav, ki imajo pravico do humanitarne zaščite, in prosilcev za azil.
Accordingly, any form of coercive detention of refugees, third-country nationals covered by humanitarian protection arrangements and asylum seekers is prohibited .
V skladu z veljavnimi mednarodnimi določbami je treba zgoraj navedeno natančno določiti.
In accordance with current international provisions, the above needs to be specified.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za državljane tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo na ozemlju države članice,
This Directive applies to third-country nationals staying illegally in the territory of a Member State , i.e.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za državljane tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo na ozemlju države članice in ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev vstopa, določenih v členu 5 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma.
This Directive applies to third-country nationals staying illegally in the territory of a Member State who do not fulfil the conditions of entry as set out in Article 5 of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement .
a) ki ne ali ki ne izpolnjujejo več pogojev vstopa, določenih v členu 5 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma, ali
(a) who do not fulfil or who no longer fulfil the conditions of entry as set out in Article 5 of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement , or
b) ki drugače nezakonito prebivajo na ozemlju države članice.
(b) who are otherwise illegally staying in the territory of a Member State .
Za izvajanje skupnih standardov v zvezi s politiko vračanja je treba uvesti ločene določbe za osebe, ki na ozemlje EU vstopajo prvič, in osebe, ki jim je država članica v preteklosti izdala dovoljenje za bivanje ali podelila eno od oblik humanitarne zaščite.
With a view to implementing common standards in connection with returns policies, separate provisions need to be introduced for persons entering EU territory for the first time and persons to whom a Member State has in the past granted a residence permit or some form of humanitarian protection.
V ta namen je treba zagotoviti ločeno direktivo za državljane tretjih držav, ki jim je bilo v preteklosti izdano dovoljenje za bivanje ali podeljena ena od oblik humanitarne zaščite.
To this end, provision should be made for a separate directive for third-country nationals who have in the past been granted a residence permit or received some form of humanitarian protection
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da ne uporabijo te direktive za državljane tretjih držav, za katere se je zavrnil vstop na tranzitno območje države članice.
Member States may decide not to apply this Directive to third-country nationals who have been refused entry in a transit zone of a Member State .
Direktiva se mora uporabljati tudi, če državljan tretje države ne vstopi na tranzitno območje, saj bi bilo treba preprečiti vsako nevarnost vračanja.
The Directive must apply even if the third-country national does not enter a transit zone, since all risk of refoulement should be averted.
Člen 2, odstavek 3, točka b a) (novo)
Article 2, paragraph 3, point (b a) (new)
ba) ki so sprožili postopke za zakonsko ureditev svojega statusa.
(ba) who have initiated regularisation procedures;
Te osebe je treba izključiti s področja uporabe direktive, glede na posebne pogoje, ki veljajo zanje.
Given the special conditions applying to such persons, they should be excluded from the directive's scope.
Člen 2, odstavek 3, točka b b) (novo)
Article 2, paragraph 3, point (b b) (new)
bb) ki so mladoletni.
(bb) who are minors;
Člen 2, odstavek 3, točka b c) (novo)
Article 2, paragraph 3, point (b c) (new)
bc) ki morajo, čeprav so že polnoletni, podaljšati bivanje na ozemlju države članice zaradi študija;
( bc) who, despite not having reached the age of majority, need to prolong their stay on the territory of a Member State for study purposes.
Člen 3, točka c)
Article 3, point (c)
c) „vrnitev“ pomeni proces vračanja v državo izvora , tranzita ali drugo tretjo državo zadevne osebe, naj bo prostovoljno ali prisilno ;
(c) ‘return’ means the process of going back to one’s country of origin , transit or another third country, whether voluntary or enforced ;
c) „vrnitev“ pomeni izključno proces vračanja v državo izvora;
(c) ‘return’ means exclusively the process of going back to one’s country of origin;
Ustrezen pomen izraza „vrnitev“, kot so potrdili zanesljivi viri v zadevnem sektorju, je izključno vrnitev v državo izvora.
The proper acceptance of the term 'return', as borne out by authoritative sources in the relevant sector, means exclusively return to the country of origin.
Kakršno koli izkrivljanje pomena tega izraza nasprotuje njegovi prvotni opredelitvi.
Any distortion of this meaning is at odds with the original definition of 'return'.
Člen 3, točka f a) (novo)
Article 3, point (f a) (new)
fa) „veliko tveganje pobega“ pomeni, da po subjektivni in objektivni presoji in po oceni sodišča obstaja resna namera, na podlagi katere je mogoče sklepati, da bo oseba, za katero je bila izdana odločitev o vrnitvi, zelo verjetno poskušala pobegniti;
(fa) 'serious risk of absconding' means the existence of serious grounds, to be defined on an individual and objective basis and assessed by the courts, that enables it to be established that the addressees of a return decision are very likely to abscond;
O tveganju pobega se ne sklepa le na osnovi dejstva, da državljan tretje države nima urejenega statusa za bivanje na ozemlju države članice.
The mere fact that a third-county national is staying irregularly in a Member State cannot constitute a risk of absconding.
Država članica mora veliko tveganje pobega utemeljiti z resnim motivom.
The Member State must demonstrate - and provide solid proof of - the existence of a serious risk of absconding.
Socialna in družinska razmerja in največje koristi otroka
Social and family ties and best interest of the child
Pri izvajanju te direktive države članice upoštevajo naravo in trdnost družinskih razmerij državljanov tretje države, njihove vezi z državo gostiteljico, kakršne koli ukrepe za zakonsko ureditev njihovega bivanja , trajanje njihovega bivanja v državi članici ter obstoj družinskih, kulturnih in socialnih vezi z njihovo državo izvora.
When implementing this Directive, Member States shall take due account of the nature and solidity of the third country national's family relationships, his ties with the host country, any steps taken to regularise his stay, the duration of his stay in the Member State and of the existence of family, cultural and social ties with his country of origin.
Mladoletnikov brez spremstva se ne sme odstraniti ali pridržati.
Unaccompanied minors may not be removed or detained.
Družinam z enim ali več mladoletniki se načeloma ne sme začasno omejiti prostosti, ampak je treba dati prednost drugim možnostim.
Families accompanied by one or more minors should not as a matter of principle be placed in temporary custody, and priority should be given to alternatives to temporary custody.
Države članice izdajo odločitev o vrnitvi vsakemu državljanu tretje države, ki nezakonito prebiva na njihovem ozemlju.
Member States shall issue a return decision to any third-country national staying illegally on their territory.
Države članice lahko izdajo posamično odločitev o vrnitvi vsakemu državljanu tretje države, ki nezakonito prebiva na njihovem ozemlju, z izjemo mladoletnikov brez spremstva .
Member States may issue a return decision to any third-country national staying illegally on their territory , with the exception of unaccompanied minors .
Države članice morajo imeti možnost izbire glede odločitve o vrnitvi.
Return decisions must remain optional for the Member States.
Ta mora vključevati vsaj šesttedenski rok vrnitve, z dajanjem prednosti prostovoljni vrnitvi pa se omogoči tudi načrtovanje vrnitve.
They must allow for a period for return of at least six weeks: prioritising voluntary return also makes it possible to plan for a return.
Za zagotavljanje največjih možnih koristi otroka se ne sme izgnati mladoletnikov brez spremstva.
The best interests of the child dictate that the expulsion of unaccompanied minors be prohibited.
Odločitev o vrnitvi omogoča ustrezno obdobje do štirih tednov za prostovoljni odhod , razen če obstajajo razlogi, zaradi katerih bi lahko verjeli, da lahko zadevna oseba v takšnem obdobju pobegne .
The return decision shall provide for an appropriate period for voluntary departure of up to four weeks, unless there are reasons to believe that the person concerned might abscond during such a period .
Odločitev o vrnitvi omogoča ustrezno obdobje za prostovoljni odhod do najmanj šest tednov .
The return decision shall provide for an appropriate period for voluntary departure of six weeks at the minimum .
V tem obdobju se lahko naložijo določene obveznosti, ki so namenjene preprečevanju velikega tveganja pobega, kot so redno javljanje organom, vloga finančne garancije, predložitev dokumentov ali obveznost zadrževanja na določenem mestu.
Certain obligations aimed at avoiding a serious risk of absconding, such as regular reporting to the authorities, deposit of a financial guarantee, submission of documents or the obligation to stay at a certain place may be imposed for the duration of that period.
Glej predlog spremembe 21.
See Amendment 21.
Odločitev o vrnitvi se izda kot ločen zakon ali odločba, ali pa skupaj z odredbo o odstranitvi.
The return decision shall be issued as a separate act or decision or together with a removal order.
Odločitev o vrnitvi se izda kot zakon ali odločba, ločeno od odredbe o odstranitvi.
The return decision shall be issued as an act or decision separate from a removal order.
Odredba o odstranitvi se lahko, čeprav je ločen dokument, izda istočasno kot odločitev o vrnitvi, vendar je veljavna le, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 7(1).
The removal order, while being separate in form, may be issued simultaneously with the return decision, but shall only be valid if the conditions set out in Article 7(1) are satisfied.
Z razveljavitvijo odločitve o vrnitvi je avtomatično razveljavljena tudi odredba o odstranitvi.
Cancellation of the return decision shall result in automatic cancellation of the removal order.
Če za države članice veljajo obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz temeljnih pravic, ki izvirajo zlasti iz Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, Ženevske konvencije o statusu beguncev, Konvencije Združenih narodov proti mučenju in Konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah iz leta 1989, kot so pravica do nevračanja, pravica do izobraževanja, pravica do nege v primeru hude bolezni in pravica do enotnosti družine, se odločitev o vrnitvi ne izda.
Where Member States are subject to obligations derived from fundamental rights as resulting, in particular, from the European Convention on Human Rights, the Geneva Convention on the Status of Refugees, the UN Convention against Torture and the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, such as the right to non-refoulement, the right to education , the right to treatment in the event of serious illness and the right to family unity, no return decision shall be issued.
Če je bila odločitev o vrnitvi že izdana, se prekliče.
Where a return decision has already been issued, it shall be withdrawn .
Zagotoviti je treba, da so v besedilu navedeni vsi viri.
To ensure that all the necessary references are included.
Države članice se lahko kadar koli odločijo za izdajo nevezanega dovoljenja za bivanje ali za drugačno dovoljenje, ki zaradi sočutja, humanitarnih razlogov ali drugih razlogov omogoča pravico do bivanja državljanu tretje države, ki nezakonito prebiva na njihovem ozemlju, s čimer v politiko priseljevanja vključijo visoko raven varovanja zdravja državljanov tretje države .
Member States may, at any moment decide to grant an autonomous residence permit or another authorisation offering a right to stay for compassionate, humanitarian or other reasons to a third-country national staying illegally on their territory , incorporating in their immigration policies a high level of protection for the health of third-country nationals.
Države članice morajo nezakonitim priseljencem zagotoviti zdravstveno varstvo tako, da v svojo politiko priseljevanja vključijo ustrezna finančna sredstva za ta namen.
Member States should provide healthcare for illegal immigrants, extending their immigration policies through the addition of appropriate financial resources for that purpose.
Nezakoniti priseljenci v državah članicah običajno živijo v zelo slabih razmerah, ki lahko resno škodujejo njihovemu zdravju.
Usually, illegal immigrants enter the Member States and live in squalid conditions which have serious effects on their health.
Ta določba se uporablja do uvedbe vseh postopkov za vzajemno priznavanje dovoljenj za bivanje na evropski ravni.
This provision shall apply until such time as all the procedures for the mutual recognition at European level of residence permits are introduced .
Pred sprejetjem evropske politike vračanja mora Unija uvesti zakonodajni okvir, ki ureja zakonite poti vstopa na evropsko ozemlje.
Before a European returns policy is adopted, the Union needs to introduce a legislative framework governing legal channels of entry to European territory.
Člen 6, odstavek 8 a (novo)
Article 6, paragraph 8 a (new)