natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
F. ker je dosedanja kohezijska politika EU učinkovito prispevala k razvoju številnih regij v nekdanjih kohezijskih državah (Irska, Grčija, Portugalska in Španija), čeprav so nekatere še vedno precej nerazvite, njen vpliv v smislu konvergence najrevnejših regij pa je pripomogel k povečanju blaginje v celotni EU,
F. whereas, to date, EU cohesion policy has made an effective contribution to the development of many regions of the former cohesion countries (Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain), even though some regions are still significantly underdeveloped and whereas its impact in terms of convergence of the poorest regions has helped to increase the prosperity of the EU as a whole,
G. ker je cilj kohezijske politike ta, da države članice in regije postanejo uspešna gospodarstva in s tem neodvisne od zunanje pomoči, čeprav prejem sredstev iz strukturnih skladov ni časovno omejen,
G. whereas the aim of cohesion policy is to render Member States and regions economically viable and thus independent from external aid, although the receipt of Structural Funds is not subject to time limitations,
H. ker ni dovolj podrobnih podatkov in primerjalnih študij z razvrstitvijo napredka regij, ki prejemajo sredstva iz strukturnih skladov,
H. whereas there is a lack of detailed information and comparative studies with rankings on the advancement of regions that profit from Structural Funds,
J. ker so v EU-27 najrevnejše regije s konvergenčnim ciljem zlasti tiste v novih državah članicah, ki so kohezijsko politiko šele začele izvajati, zato ni mogoče oceniti njene učinkovitosti pri zmanjševanju neenakosti,
J. whereas in EU-27 the poorest convergence objective regions are located principally in the new Member States, where the implementation of cohesion policy only recently began, and thus it is impossible to evaluate its success in reducing disparities,
K. ker je v najrevnejših državah članicah gospodarska rast neenakomerna in je skoncentrirana okoli mestnih območij, velik delež prebivalstva teh držav pa živi na podeželju,
K. whereas in the poorest Member States economic growth is unevenly distributed and tends to be concentrated around urban areas, while in these countries a substantial part of the population lives in rural areas,
L. ker v regijah, ki so gospodarsko revne zaradi pomanjkanja osnovne infrastrukture, omejenega dostopa do javnih storitev in visoke brezposelnosti, število prebivalcev upada hitreje kot v drugih regijah, kar ogroža njihovo zmožnost za zagotavljanje resničnega razvoja,
L. whereas regions suffering from economic poverty resulting from a lack of basic infrastructure, restricted access to public services and high unemployment are becoming depopulated at a faster rate than other regions and whereas this, in turn, undermines their ability to secure genuine development,
M. ker člen 299(2) Pogodbe o ES določa, da mora Skupnost svojo politiko prilagoditi ter sprejeti posebne in specifične ukrepe za najbolj oddaljene regije, pri čemer mora upoštevati poseben položaj teh regij, med katerimi večina spada med najrevnejše regije EU zaradi kombiniranih ter trajnih posledic strukturnih in geografskih pomanjkljivosti, ki močno ovirajo njihov razvoj,
M. whereas Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty requires the Community to adjust its policies and to apply special and specific measures to the outermost regions, given the specific situation of these regions, most of which are among the poorest regions of the EU, a factor which severely handicaps their development because of the combined and lasting effects of structural and geographic disadvantages,
N. ker je bila v sklopu kohezijske politike uporaba sredstev v najrevnejših regijah nekaterih novih držav članic v obdobju 2004–2006 nizka,
N. whereas in some of the new Member States the uptake of funding in the poorest regions coming under cohesion policy was low during the period 2004 to 2006,
O. ker je za uspešno izvajanje financiranja iz strukturnih skladov potrebno tesno sodelovanje med organi na lokalni, regionalni in nacionalni ravni ter na ravni Skupnosti,
O. whereas, if structural funding is to be successfully implemented, close coordination is required between authorities at local, regional, national and Community levels,
P. ker odobritev financiranja sama po sebi še ne zagotavlja, da bodo sredstva dobro uporabljena, in ker organi v revnih regijah pogosto nimajo ustreznega znanja in izkušenj ter osnovnih primernih sredstev, da bi lahko v celoti izkoristili kohezijska sredstva, do katerih so upravičeni,
P. whereas the fact that funding has been granted does not guarantee per se that it will be put to good use, and whereas authorities in poor regions often lack the appropriate skills and experience and the essential matching funds to be able to make full use of the cohesion funding to which they are entitled,
Q. ker obstaja vrsta razlogov za gospodarsko zaostalost posameznih regij in ker v najrevnejših regijah EU primanjkuje predvsem osnovne infrastrukture, ki je bistvena za uravnotežen trajnostni razvoj in dodatne naložbe, ter ustreznih človeških virov in pobud na področju izobraževanja, vseživljenjskega učenja in inovacij,
Q. whereas there are a number of reasons for the economic backwardness of individual regions and whereas the poorest EU regions above all lack the basic infrastructure that is essential for balanced sustainable development and further investment, as well as adequate human resources and adequate incentives for education, lifelong learning and innovation,
R. ker so zasebni lastniški kapital, tvegani kapital, menjavajoči se skladi in mikroposojila za novoustanovljena podjetja, ključna gonilna sila za podjetništvo, inovacije in ustvarjanje delovnih mest;
R. whereas private equity, venture capital, rotating funds and micro-credits for start-ups play an essential role as a driving force for entrepreneurship, innovation and job creation,
S. ker socialna izključenost in izredno visoka raven dolgotrajne brezposelnosti prevladujeta predvsem v revnejših regijah, zlasti med ženskami, starejšimi in invalidnimi osebami ter ranljivimi etničnimi skupinami,
S. whereas social exclusion and extremely high long-term unemployment rates are particularly prevalent in the poorest regions, especially among women and the elderly, disabled persons and vulnerable ethnic groups,
T. ker temeljne pravice državljanov zajemajo enak dostop moških in žensk do vseh javnih storitev, enake možnosti na trgu dela in enak dostop do izobraževanja, kulture ter zdravstvenih in socialnih storitev,
T. whereas fundamental citizens' rights include equal access for men and women to all utilities, equal opportunities on the labour market and equal access to education, culture and health and social services,
Komisijo in države članice opozarja na položaj regij, ki zaradi izključno statističnih podatkov ne spadajo več med najrevnejše regije v EU-27, kljub temu, da so najrevnejše regije v EU-15 in da podatki o njihovem razvoju niso izboljšani; priporoča, da se upošteva tudi poseben položaj teh regij;
Draws the attention of the Commission and the Member States to the situation of regions which, despite being the poorest in EU-15 and despite the lack of improvement in their development data, are no longer considered the poorest regions of EU-27 for purely statistical reasons; recommends that consideration be given to the specific situation of those regions;
5. izraža zaskrbljenost, da je pomoč Skupnosti v nekaterih regijah slabo usmerjena, zaradi česar se položaj v njih kljub večletnem financiranju ne izboljšuje in se neprimerno zapravlja sredstva Skupnosti;
Is concerned that in some regions Community assistance is poorly targeted, with the result that the situation in those regions fails to improve despite many years of funding and that Community resources are squandered;
9. poziva države članice ter regionalne in lokalne organe, naj pri načrtovanju prihodnjih regionalnih razvojnih programov upoštevajo potrebo po uravnoteženem razvoju v posameznih regijah; meni, da je zlasti pomembno upoštevati posebne potrebe mestnih območij z ustrezno urbanistično politiko, vključno s stanovanjsko politiko za „revne predele“, in izvajati ustrezno podeželsko politiko;
Calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to take due account of the need for balanced development within individual regions when planning future regional development programmes; believes it particularly important for account to be taken of the specific needs of urban areas, with an appropriate urban policy including a housing policy for 'poor neighbourhoods', and for an appropriate rural policy to be pursued;
15. poudarja, da je na področju kohezijske politike za spodbujanje uravnoteženega razvoja pomembno teritorialno sodelovanje (čezmejno, nadnacionalno in medregionalno); v zvezi s tem spodbuja vzpostavitev mrež regionalnega in medsektorskega sodelovanja, v katere bodo vključene predvsem najrevnejše regije;
Stresses the importance of territorial cooperation (cross-border, transnational and interregional) in the context of the EU's cohesion policy in order to promote balanced development; encourages in this regard the setting up of regional and sectoral cooperation networks, involving, especially the poorest regions;
17. spodbuja države članice, naj podpirajo podjetništvo v šolah in programe usposabljanja za bodoče podjetnike, ki so namenjeni predvsem mladim, ženskam, starejšim osebam in manjšinam, izpostavljenim socialni izključenosti;
Encourages Member States to promote entrepreneurship in schools and to support training schemes for future entrepreneurs, aimed in particular at young people, women, elderly persons and minorities exposed to social exclusion;
21. spodbuja države članice, naj vzpostavijo javno-zasebna partnerstva kot učinkovita sredstva za vključevanje zasebnega kapitala v financiranje regionalnih projektov; v zvezi s tem predlaga določitev preprostih in preglednih pravil, ki bodo urejala vzpostavitev takšnih partnerstev, ki dolgoročno vplivajo na javne finance;
Encourages Member States to set up public-private partnerships (PPPs) as an effective means of involving private capital in the funding of regional projects; suggests, in this connection, that simple and transparent rules governing the setting up of such partnerships should be laid down given their long-term impact on public finances;
UL L 371, 27.12.2006, str.
OJ L 371, 27.12.2006, p.
1. z dne 8. decembra 2006;
1. of 8 December 2006;
Komisijo in države članice opozarja, da je treba za zagotavljanje uravnoteženega razvoja vzpostaviti sinergijo med gospodarskimi, socialnimi in okoljskimi vidiki na podlagi analiz razlogov za gospodarsko zaostalost, s posebnim poudarkom na brezposelnosti in njenih osnovnih strukturah, zlasti v najrevnejših regijah;
Draws the attention of the Commission and the Member States to the fact that, with a view to securing balanced development, synergies need to be established between economic, social and environmental aspects, drawing on an analysis of the reasons for economic backwardness, with particular reference to unemployment and its underlying structures, especially in the poorest regions;
30. poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša sistem za ocenjevanje kohezijske politike in določi novi način merjenja regionalnega razvoja, ki bo temeljil ne le na BDP, ampak tudi na drugih kazalnikih, kot so stopnje brezposelnosti ter drugi količinski in kakovostni kazalniki, pri tem pa izboljša metodologijo za izračun paritete kupne moči, in sicer z oblikovanjem regionalnih, ne pa nacionalnih kazalnikov;
Calls on the Commission to improve the system used to assess cohesion policy, and to devise a new means of measuring regional development, based not just on GDP but also on other indicators such as unemployment rates and other quantitative and qualitative indicators, whilst improving the methodology for the calculation of Power Purchasing Parities, namely through the development of regional rather than national indicators;
Kohezijska politika EU začenja novo programsko obdobje.
EU cohesion policy is entering a new programming period.
To je prvo leto v obdobju finančne perspektive 2007–2013, v katerem se uporabljajo nova pravila kohezijske politike.
This is the first year in the 2007-2013 financial perspective period in which new cohesion policy regulations apply.
Sprejete so bile strateške smernice in določena splošna zasnova politike.
Strategic guidelines have been adopted and the broad lines of the policy have been laid down.
Sedaj je treba predstaviti ustrezna priporočila za čim bolj učinkovito novo kohezijsko politiko.
Now is the time for appropriate recommendations to be put forward with a view to making the new cohesion policy as effective as possible.
Na podlagi statističnih podatkov o dosedanjem vplivu kohezijske politike in poznavanja težav, zaradi katerih nekatere države v preteklosti niso mogle v celoti izkoristiti strukturnih sredstev, želi to poročilo na lastno pobudo zagotoviti, da bo kohezijska politika v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 čim bolj učinkovita, njen vpliv pa čim bolj viden in zaznaven, zlasti v najrevnejših regijah EU.
On the basis of statistics showing the impact that cohesion policy has already had and an awareness of the problems that prevented some countries from drawing the full benefits from structural funding in the past, this own-initiative report seeks to ensure that cohesion policy will be as effective as possible in the 2007-2013 programming period, so that its impact will be as visible and perceptible as possible, particularly in the poorest EU regions.
Izredno pomembno je poudariti načela, na katerih bi lahko temeljili ukrepi držav članic in EU za povečanje učinkovitosti kohezijske politike v najrevnejših regijah in zagotovitev najboljših možnih rezultatov v smislu socialne, ekonomske in ozemeljske kohezije v teh regijah.
It is vitally important to place the emphasis on the principles on which the Member States and the EU could base action to enhance cohesion policy's effectiveness in the poorest regions and secure the best possible results in terms of social, economic and territorial cohesion in those regions.
Sredstva so bila že namenjena regijam, ki spadajo v okvir konvergenčnih ciljev finančne perspektive 2007–2013, zdaj pa je treba zagotoviti, da se bo financiranje dejansko izvajalo tako, da bodo najrevnejše regije dosegle vsaj povprečno razvojno raven EU-27.
Funding has already been earmarked for regions coming under the Convergence Objective in the 2007-2013 financial perspective, and it must now be ensured that that funding is actually taken up with a view to bringing the poorest regions up to a least the EU 27 average development level.
To mora omogočiti postopno odpravo ogromnih razlik med najbogatejšimi in najrevnejšimi regijami Evropske unije.
This should enable the disparity between the richest and poorest EU regions, which is currently enormous, to be progressively reduced.
Večina najrevnejših regij je v novih državah članicah, ki pogosto nimajo upravne zmogljivosti, znanja in izkušenj, potrebnih za uporabo razpoložljivih sredstev.
Most of the poorest regions are located in the new Member States, which often lack the administrative capacity, skills and experience required in order to make use of the funding available.
V poročilu je predstavljena vrsta priporočil in pripomb, katerih namen je izboljšati prejem in uporabo strukturnih sredstev ter tako doseči trajnostni razvoj v najrevnejših regijah.
This report contains a number of recommendations and remarks aimed at improving the uptake and use of structural funds and thus achieving sustainable development in the poorest regions.
Glavni cilj evropske kohezijske politike je odpraviti razvojne razlike med regijami, saj je hiter razvoj najrevnejših regij v interesu celotne Unije.
The main goal of EU cohesion policy is to reduce development disparities among regions; swift development of the poorest regions is in the interests of the entire Union.
Zdaj spada 100 najrevnejših regij, t.j. regij, katerih BDP na prebivalca je nižji od 75 % povprečja EU, v okvir konvergenčnega cilja kohezijske politike.
Currently, 100 of what are considered to be the poorest regions – i.e. whose per capita GDP is less than 75% of the EU average – come under the cohesion policy's Convergence Objective.
Razlike med regijami v smislu BDP na prebivalca so izredno velike in so večje v EU-27, kot so bile v EU-15.
Disparities between regions in per capita GDP terms are extremely large, and are higher in the EU 27 than they were in the EU 15.
Te razlike so prikazane v spodnji tabeli 1.
These disparities are illustrated in Table 1 below.
Regionalni BDP na prebivalca v EU 27 za leto 2004 (standard kupne moči EU 27 = 100)
Regional per capita GDP in the EU 27 – 2004 figures (in PPS, EU 27 = 100)
15 regij z najvišjim BDP
The 15 regions with the highest GDP
15 regij z najnižjim BDP
The fifteen regions with the lowest GDP
ožje mesto London (Združeno kraljestvo)
Inner London (UK)
jugo-osrednja Bolgarija (BG)
Yuzhen tsentralen (BG)
severno-osrednja Bolgarija (BG)
Severen tsentralen (BG)
jugozahodna Romunija – Oltenija (RO)
Sud-Vest Oltenia (RO)
severovzhodna Škotska (Združeno kraljestvo)
North Eastern Scotland (UK)
Vir: Sporočilo za javnost Eurostat 23/2007 – 19. februar 2007.
Source: Eurostat news release 23/2007 – 19 February 2007
Zgornji podatki, ki jih je objavil Eurostat, kažejo na veliko razliko v stopnji razvoja med najbogatejšimi in najrevnejšimi regijami EU, večina najrevnejših regij pa je v državah članicah Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope, ki so se Uniji pridružile v zadnjih dveh valih širitve (2004 in 2007).
The above figures published by Eurostat show there to be a huge development gap between the richest and poorest EU regions, with most of the poorest regions being located in central and eastern European Member States which joined the Union during the last two enlargements (2004 and 2007).
Zaradi takšnega položaja je treba resno ukrepati, da se odpravijo razlike med najbogatejšimi in najrevnejšimi regijami.
This situation calls for serious action to reduce the disparities between the richest and poorest regions.
Za zagotovitev uravnoteženega razvoja bi morale regije, ki zaostajajo v razvoju oziroma so v postopku prestrukturiranja ali izpostavljene posebnim geografskim, gospodarskim ali socialnim oviram
With a view to enabling them to secure balanced development, regions lagging behind in development terms, undergoing restructuring or suffering from specific geographical, economic or social handicaps
Najbolj oddaljene regije, otoki, gorska območja in redko poseljene regije. , poleg razpoložljivih sredstev prejeti še tehnično pomoč, da bodo lahko odpravile postopkovne težave, s katerimi se soočajo pri izvajanju kohezijske politike EU.
Outermost regions, islands, mountain areas and thinly populated regions. should, in addition to the funding available, be given technical assistance in order to enable them to deal with the procedural difficulties surrounding the implementation of EU cohesion policy.
Kohezijska politika je omogočila številnim regijam EU, ki so bile prej revne, da so dosegle zadovoljivo stopnjo razvoja.
Cohesion policy has enabled many previously poor EU regions to reach a satisfactory level of development.
Vse štiri države, ki so bile prej znane kot „kohezijske države“ (Irska, Grčija, Portugalska in Španija), so s pomočjo strukturnih in kohezijskih sredstev dosegle izjemno stopnjo gospodarske rasti.
With the assistance of structural and cohesion funding all four of what were previously known as the 'cohesion countries' (Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain) have experienced remarkable levels of economic growth.
Tabela 2.
Table 2.
Napredek kohezijskih držav v smislu BDP na prebivalca ( EU = 100)
Ground made up by cohesion countries in terms of per capita GDP ( EU =100)
Španija Portugalska Grčija Irska
Spain Portugal Greece Ireland
Vir: Catching-up in Europe: The experiences of Portugal, Spain and Greece in the Nineties, Karl Aiginger; Wifo (Österreichisches Institut für wirtschaftsforschung), delovni dokumenti, št. 212, december 2003, str.
Source: Catching-up in Europe: The experiences of Portugal , Spain and Greece in the Nineties, Karl Aiginger; Wifo (Österreichisches Institut für wirtschaftsforschung) Working Papers, No 212, December 2003, p.
Pomanjkanje celostnih ali dovolj primerljivih statističnih podatkov o razvoju v najrevnejših regijah onemogoča pripravo točne analize o tem, do katere mere so strukturna sredstva prispevala k regionalnemu razvoju.
The lack of comprehensive or sufficiently comparable statistics on development in the poorest regions is preventing an accurate analysis being made of the degree to which structural funding has contributed to regional development.
Vendar splošna analiza podatkov BDP kaže, da se je v obdobju od šestdesetih let 20. stoletja do leta 2002 BDP Španije povečal s 60,76 % na skoraj 85 % povprečja Skupnosti, BDP Portugalske iz 40 % na 69 %, BDP Grčije s 44 % na 66 % in BDP Irske s 65 % na 122 %.
However, a general analysis of GDP figures shows that over the period between the 'Sixties and 2002, Spain's GDP rose from 60.76% to almost 85% of the Community average, Portugal's from 40% to 69%, Greece's from 44% to 66% and Ireland's from 65% to 122%.
Na podlagi teh pozitivnih primerov lahko predvidevamo, da bodo države članice, ki spadajo v okvir sedanjega konvergenčnega cilja, ob svojem času izkoristile priložnosti, ki jim jih ponuja nova kohezijska politika, zlasti zato, ker je njihova stopnja gospodarske rasti glede na to, da je njihov BDP nižji od povprečja EU, precej višja od povprečja EU, s čimer kažejo na velik razvojni potencial.
On the basis of these positive examples, it may be assumed that the Member States coming under the current Convergence Objective will, in their turn, take advantage of the opportunities that the new cohesion policy is offering them, particularly since, despite the fact that their GDPs are lower than the EU average, they have an economic growth rate that is well above the EU average and thus show great development potential.
Tabela 3.
Table 3.
Realna stopnja rasti BDP
Real GDP growth rate
Stopnja rasti BDP – spremembe v odstotkih v primerjavi s predhodnim letom
GDP growth rate – percentage change over previous year
(podatki za 2006, 2007 in 2008 so napovedi)
(the figures for 2006, 2007 and 2008 are forecasts)
Iz Tabele 3 je razvidno, da imata državi, ki sta se EU pridružili leta 2007, Bolgarija in Romunija, zelo velik potencial za razvoj gospodarstva.
As can be seen from Table 3, the two countries which joined the EU in 2007 – Bulgaria and Romania – show a particularly high economic growth potential.
Da bi ta potencial v celoti izkoristile, so potrebne predvsem primerne priprave, kar vključuje učinkovite upravne službe.
If this potential is to be fully realised, proper preparations need, first and foremost, to be made, and this includes effective administration.
Vendar statistični podatki o porabi sredstev v začetnem dvoletnem obdobju kažejo, da države članice, ki so se Uniji pridružile leta 2004, kljub velikemu gospodarskemu napredku niso v celoti porabile razpoložljivih sredstev do leta 2006, zlasti zaradi t. i. upravne neučinkovitosti.
However, the statistics for the uptake of funding over the initial two-year period show that, despite the major economic progress achieved, the Member States that joined in 2004 failed to make full use of the funds available to them up to 2006, owing mainly to what may be generally termed administrative inefficiency.
Tabela 4.
Table 4.
Poraba strukturnih in kohezijskih sredstev v EU 10
Structural and cohesion funding uptake in the EU 10
(od maja 2004 do septembra 2006)
(May 2004 to September 2006)
Vir: Predstavitev komisarke Dalie Grybauskaitė, ki je pristojna za finančno načrtovanje in proračun, v Bruslju, 21. septembra 2006.
Source: Presentation by Dalia Grybauskaitė, Commissioner with responsibility for financial programming and budget, Brussels , 21 September 2006.
Veliko novih držav članic ne uporablja sredstev, ki so jim na voljo.
There are a large number of examples of new Member States failing to make use of the funding available.
Največ težav pri porabi sredstev imajo najrevnejše regije.
The poorest regions tend to experience the most difficulties in taking up funding.