natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nobena določba te direktive ne preprečuje državi članici, da sprejme dodatne ukrepe o pomorski varnosti, ki niso zajeti v tej direktivi, pod pogojem, da takšni ukrepi ne posegajo v to direktivo ali na kakršen koli način negativno vplivajo na doseganje njenega cilja ter da ne ogrožajo uresničevanja ciljev Skupnosti .
Nothing contained in this Directive shall prevent a Member State from taking additional measures on maritime safety which are not covered by this Directive, provided that such measures do not infringe this Directive or in any way adversely affect the attainment of its objective , nor jeopardise the realisation of the objectives of the Union .
S predlogom spremembe se besedilo uskladi s stališčem Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave (glej predlog spremembe 24 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta).
This amendment brings the text in line with Parliament's position in first reading (see amendment 24 adopted in first reading).
Člen 23 – odstavek 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do …
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by....
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najkasneje do ...*.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by... at the latest.
Komisiji takoj sporočijo besedilo teh določb in korelacijsko tabelo med njimi in direktivo.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive .
Države članice se v sprejetih predpisih sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
When Member States adopt those measures , they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Države članice se v sprejetih določbah sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
When Member States adopt those provisions , they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Kot je prvotno predlagala Komisija, bi morale biti države članice dolžne pripraviti korelacijske tabele, v katerih natančno prikažejo, s katerimi določbami so posamezne zahteve iz direktive prenesene v nacionalno zakonodajo.
As originally proposed by the Commission, there should be an obligation for Member States to draw up correspondence tables, which indicate exactly by which provisions each of the requirements laid down in the Directive are transposed into national legislation.
Predlog spada v tretji paket zakonodajnih ukrepov za krepitev pomorske varnosti.
This proposal is part of the third package of legislative measures aimed at improving maritime safety.
Določa predpise na ravni Skupnosti za preiskave po pomorskih nesrečah in nezgodah.
It lays down rules at Community level for investigations following maritime casualties and incidents.
Točneje obvezuje države članice, da izvedejo tehnične preiskave po resnih in zelo resnih pomorskih nezgodah.
More specifically, it introduces an obligation for Member States to carry out technical investigations after serious and very serious marine incidents.
Preiskovalci morajo slediti skupni metodologiji.
The investigations have to follow a common methodology.
Namen tega je, da bi ugotovili okoliščine in preučili vzroke nesreč ter se iz njih nekaj naučili in tako preprečili katastrofe v prihodnje.
The purpose is to establish the circumstances and examine the causes of the incidents in order to draw all possible lessons from them and thereby prevent future disasters.
Države članice so po preiskavi dolžne pripraviti poročilo o nesreči (po potrebi skupaj z varnostnimi priporočili) v obliki, predpisani v prilogi tega predloga.
After the investigation, Member States are required to prepare an accident report (including safety recommendations, if appropriate) in a format defined in the annex of the proposal.
Predlagana direktiva prav tako zavezuje države članice k oblikovanju potrebnega institucionalnega okvira, in sicer z vzpostavitvijo specializiranih teles s preiskovalnimi pooblastili.
Furthermore, the proposed Directive obliges Member States to create the necessary institutional framework by setting up independent specialised bodies with investigative powers.
V primeru nesreč, ki zadevajo dve ali več držav članic, predlog omogoča skupne preiskave pod vodstvom ene izmed držav članic, da bi se tako izognili vzporednim preiskavam.
In cases of incidents involving two or more Member Sates, the proposal provides for joint investigations under the lead of one Member State with a view to avoiding parallel investigations.
Stališče Parlamenta iz prve obravnave.
Parliament position in first reading
Stališče Parlamenta iz prve obravnave vsebuje 24 predlogov sprememb k predlogu Komisije.
Parliament's position in first reading comprises 24 amendments to the Commission proposal.
Nanašajo se na sledeča vprašanja:
They relate to the following issues:
Če se države članice ne uspejo dogovoriti o vodilni preiskovalni državi članici, o njej odloči Komisija.
If Member States fail to determine a lead investigating state by mutual agreement, the Commission should take a decision.
Upoštevanje predlogov sprememb Parlamenta
Consideration of Parliament's amendments
5), ki je bil v celoti upoštevan, pa pravi, da preiskave v zvezi varnostjo ne smejo biti namenjene ugotavljanju odgovornosti ali delitvi krivde.
The other amendment (AM 5) which was fully considered makes clear that safety investigations must not be concerned with determining liability or apportioning blame.
Dva predloga sprememb sta bila delno upoštevana.
Two amendments were taken into account partly.
Pri prvem je Svet vnesel uvodno izjavo o pravičnem obravnavanju mornarjev v besedilu, ki je podoben predlogu spremembe 3.
Firstly, Council introduced a recital on the fair treatment of seafarers with a text similar to amendment 3.
Pri drugem je vključil sklicevanje na UNCLOS v členu 2(1), vendar se za razliko od predloga spremembe 6, izrecno sklicuje na opredelitev teritorialnega morja in notranjih voda.
Secondly, it included a reference to UNCLOS into Article 2(1) but unlike amendment 6 with particular reference to the definition of territorial sea and internal waters.
Preostali predlogi sprememb niso bili vključeni v skupno stališče.
The remaining amendments were not incorporated into the common position.
Novi elementi, ki jih je vnesel Svet
New elements introduced by Council
- Omejitev področja uporabe direktive: V skladu s skupnim stališčem naj bi bile preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo obvezne le za zelo resne nezgode.
- Restricting the scope of the Directive : According to the common position, safety investigations would only be obligatory for very serious incidents.
V primeru resnih (in drugih) pomorskih nesreč bi se lahko preiskovalno telo odločilo, ali sprožiti preiskavo.
In the event of serious (and other) marine casualties, the investigative body can decide whether or not to carry out an investigation.
Iz področja uporabe direktive so popolnoma izvzeti klici v sili.
Distress alerts are completely excluded from the scope of the Directive.
- Funkcionalna neodvisnost preiskovalnih teles: Skupno stališče daje državam članicam več neodvisnosti pri določanju funkcionalnih in organizacijskih struktur.
- Functional independence of investigative bodies : The common position gives Member States more autonomy in determining functional and organisational structures.
Prav tako ne zavezuje kopenskih držav članic, pod zastavami katerih ne pluje nobena ladja, k ustanovitvi preiskovalnega telesa (vzpostaviti morajo le neodvisne kontaktne točke).
It also exempts landlocked Member States with no ships flying their flag from establishing an investigative body (they would only have to establish 'independent focal points').
- Vključitev ribiških plovil, daljših od 15 metrov, v področje uporabe direktive : Predlog Komisije izključuje ribiška plovila, krajša od 24 metrov.
- Including fishing vessels with a length of more than 15m in the scope of the Directive : The Commission proposal excludes fishing vessels with a length of less than 24m.
- Regulativni postopek s pregledom za posodabljanje opredelitev in prilog: Parlament je v prvi obravnavi vnesel regulativni postopek s pregledom le za določitev skupne metodologije (glej zgoraj).
- Regulatory procedure with scrutiny for updating definitions and annexes : Parliament in first reading introduced the regulatory procedure with scrutiny only for defining a joint methodology (see above).
Svet pa polje uporabe razširja na posodabljanje opredelitev in prilog.
The Council extends its field of application to the updating of definitions and annexes.
- Druge spremembe: Med drugim se nanašajo na sodelovanje med državami članicami in na njihovo možnost, da pri nekaterih preiskavah oblikujejo poenostavljena poročila.
- Other changes : They relate among other things to the co-operation between Member States and the possibility for MS to produce simplified reports for certain investigations.
Razen tega je Svet črtal obveznost oblikovanja korelacijskih tabel, ki kažejo, s katerimi določbami je direktiva prenesena v nacionalno zakonodajo.
In addition, Council deletes the obligation to draw up correspondence tables indicating by which national provisions the Directive is transposed.
Nekatere druge spremembe so tehnične narave in/ali služijo za pojasnitve besedila.
Some other modifications are of a technical nature and/or serve to clarify the text.
Priporočila poročevalca za drugo branje
Rapporteur's recommendations for second reading
Ponoven vnos predlogov sprememb iz prve obravnave
Reintroduction of amendments from first reading
Kot je že bilo omenjeno, je Svet upošteval le tri izmed predlogov sprememb Parlamenta iz prve obravnave, dva predloga sprememb pa deloma.
As mentioned above, only 3 of Parliament's amendments in first reading were fully taken into account by the Council, while 2 were considered in part.
Vendar pa ta dva predloga sprememb ni treba znova vlagati.
It is not necessary, however, to re-table these 2 amendments.
Izrecnejša omemba UNCLOS v besedilu Sveta je boljša od besedila iz predloga spremembe Parlamenta.
First of all, the Council's more specific reference to UNCLOS is preferable over the wording of Parliament's amendment.
V zvezi z uvodno izjavo o pravičnem obravnavanju mornarjev pa zadostuje, da se besedilo Sveta uskladi z ustreznim členom, ki ga je vnesel Parlament.
As far as the recital on the fair treatment of seafarers is concerned, it is sufficient to adapt the Council's wording in line with the corresponding Article introduced by Parliament.
Poročevalec priporoča, da se vsi preostali predlogi sprememb iz prve obravnave Parlamenta (glej 2. točko) ponovno vnesejo v besedilo.
Your rapporteur recommends that all remaining Parliament amendments from first reading (see point 2) are reintroduced.
Nekateri izmed njih so vključeni v druge dele besedila kot v prvi obravnavi, da bi tako ohranili skladnost direktive.
Some of them are placed in parts of the text other than where they were inserted in first reading in order to ensure that the Directive maintains a coherent structure.
Iz podobnih razlogov je bilo rahlo spremenjeno tudi besedilo nekaterih predlogov sprememb, vendar brez vsebinskih sprememb.
For similar reasons, the wording of certain amendments was slightly adapted, but without changing their substance.
Sprejemljive spremembe Sveta
Acceptable Council modifications
Nekatere spremembe, ki jih je Svet vnesel v predlog Komisije, so potrebne tehnične spremembe in/ali spremembe, ki pojasnjujejo besedilo in bi jih bilo zato treba sprejeti.
Some of the Council's changes to the Commission proposal are necessary technical adaptations and/or clarify the wording and should therefore be accepted.
Druge zadevajo bistvene elemente predloga.
Others concern substantial elements of the proposal.
Če spremembe krepijo direktivo (omejevanje največje dovoljene dolžine ribiških plovil, ki so izvzeta iz področja uporabe direktive) ali povečujejo pristojnosti Parlamenta pri sprejemanju izvedbenih ukrepov (uvedba regulativnega postopka s pregledom pri posodabljanju opredelitev in prilog), poročevalec priporoča njihovo vključitev v besedilo.
As far as these changes strengthen the Directive (reducing the maximum length of fishing vessels to be exempted from the scope) or increase Parliament's powers in the adoption of implementing measures (introduction of regulatory procedure with scrutiny for updating definitions and annexes), your rapporteur recommends that they be taken on board.
Prav tako se v zvezi z zahtevami glede vzpostavitve preiskovalnih teles priporoča sprejetje posebnih določb za kopenske države.
Furthermore, it is suggested to accept the special provision for landlocked countries in relation to requirements for establishing investigative bodies.
Končno bi Parlament lahko sprejel tudi določbo, ki državam članicam dopušča objavo poenostavljenega poročila pri preiskavah nesreč, ki niso resne ali zelo resne.
Finally, Parliament could accept a provision allowing Member States to publish a simplified report on the investigation of accidents that are not serious or very serious.
Zavrnjene spremembe Sveta
Rejected Council modifications
Številne spremembe, ki jih je vnesel Svet, bi zmanjšale učinkovitost direktive, zato jih je po mnenju poročevalca treba zavrniti.
A number of modifications introduced by the Council would reduce the Directive's effectiveness and should therefore be rejected in your rapporteur's view.
Zato so predlagane spremembe določenih delov skupnega stališča, s katerimi bi se vrnilo k besedilu iz predloga Komisije.
It is therefore suggested to amend the respective parts of the common position so as to restore the text of the Commission proposal.
Še zlasti ni sprejemljivo, da bi obvezne preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo omejili le na zelo resne nezgode (pri čemer bi izključili resne nezgode).
In particular, it is not acceptable to limit mandatory safety investigations to very serious incidents only (thus excluding serious accidents).
Prav tako bi morali biti v področje uporabe direktive vključeni klici v sili, da bi jih preučil vsaj pristojni organ, ki bi se lahko nato odločil, ali sprožiti preiskavo v celoti.
Likewise, distress alerts should remain within the scope of the Directive so that they are at least examined by the competent body, who may subsequently decide whether or not to carry out a full investigation.
Drugič, poročevalec meni, da morajo države članice nujno uporabljati skupno metodologijo pri preiskovanju nesreč, kot to predvideva predlog Komisije.
Secondly, your rapporteur considers it essential that Member States apply a common methodology in investigating accidents, such as foreseen by the Commission proposal.
Spremembe besedila, ki jih je vnesel Svet in po katerih bi države članice morale slediti le načelom skupne metodologije, bi bilo treba zato zavrniti.
The Council's changes to the text, according to which Member States would only have to follow principles of the common methodology, should thus be rejected.
Tretjič je treba nujno zagotoviti, da so preiskovalna telesa nepristranska in funkcionalno neodvisna.
Thirdly, it is of utmost importance to ensure that investigative bodies are impartial and functionally independent.
Direktiva bi morala posebej omenjati tiste nacionalne pomorske organe, od katerih morajo biti preiskovalna telesa funkcionalno neodvisna, saj bi drugače lahko prišlo do navzkrižja interesov.
The Directive should make specific references to those national marine authorities, from which the investigative bodies must be functionally independent because there could otherwise be a potential conflict of interest.
Zato bi bilo treba ponovno vnesti te omembe (ki so bile v skupnem stališču izpuščene).
Hence, these references (which are missing in the common position) should be restored.
Končno Parlament ne bi smel sprejeti tega, da je Svet črtal obveznost držav članic, da pripravijo korelacijske tabele, v katerih natančno prikažejo, s katerimi določbami so posamezne zahteve iz direktive prenesene v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Finally, Parliament should not accept the Council's deletion of the Member States' obligation to draw up correspondence tables, which indicate precisely by which national provision each of the Directive's requirements is transposed.
Korelacijske tabele Komisiji omogočajo, da natančno preuči prenos in uporabo direktive v državah članicah, kar je ključnega pomena za njeno učinkovitost.
Correspondence tables ensure that the Commission can thoroughly scrutinise the transposition and implementation of the Directive by Member States, which is of key importance for its effectiveness.
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odgovornosti prevoznikov potnikov po morju in celinskih plovnih poteh v primeru nesreč
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of accidents
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (6389/2/2008 – C6‑0227/2008 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (6389/2/2008 – C6‑0227/2008 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 25.4.2008, P6_TA(2007)0148 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0592 ),
Texts adopted, 25.4.2007, P6_TA(2007)0148 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0592 ),
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2007)0645 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0645 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0333/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0333/2008 ),
(3a) Sistem zavarovanja, kakor ga zahteva atenska konvencija, mora ustrezati finančnim sredstvom lastnikov ladij in zavarovalnih družb.
(3a) The insurance arrangements required under the Athens Convention must be appropriate to the financial means of ship-owners and insurance companies.
Lastniki ladij morajo imeti možnost, da svoj sistem zavarovanja urejajo gospodarno, zlasti v primeru malih ladjarskih družb, ki opravljajo storitve domačega prevoza, pa je treba upoštevati sezonsko naravo njihove dejavnosti.
Ship-owners must be in a position to manage their insurance arrangements in an economically acceptable way and, particularly in the case of small shipping companies operating national transport services, account must be taken of the seasonal nature of their operations.
Prehodno obdobje, ki je predvideno za izvajanje te uredbe, mora biti dovolj dolgo, da se uredi obvezno zavarovanje, ki je predvideno z atensko konvencijo, ne da bi to vplivalo na obstoječe sisteme zavarovanja.
The transitional period which is provided for in the application of this Regulation must be sufficiently long to enable the compulsory insurance provided for by the Athens Convention to b e arranged without affecting existing insurance schemes.
Ta predlog spremembe ponovno uvaja predlog spremembe 1 iz prve obravnave.
This amendment reintroduces Amendment 1 from the first reading.
Če naj sistem nadomestil deluje realistično in učinkovito, morajo biti zavarovalne družbe sposobne izvrševati določbe konvencije, obstajati pa mora tudi način, da se zagotovi preživetje in konkurenčnost ladjarskih družb, zlasti malih in srednje velikih.
If the system of compensation is to function realistically and effectively, insurance companies must be able to fulfil the provisions of the Convention, and there must also be a way to ensure the viability and competitiveness of shipping companies, particularly those of small and medium size.
(3b) V primeru smrti ali poškodbe potnika je treba prevoznika zavezati k predplačilu, pri čemer predplačilo ne pomeni priznanja odgovornosti.
(3b) It is appropriate to oblige the carrier to make advance payment in the event of the death of or personal injury to a passenger, whereby advance payment does not constitute recognition of liability.
Ta predlog spremembe ponovno uvaja predlog spremembe 2 iz prve obravnave.
This amendment reintroduces Amendment 2 from the first reading.
(3c) Potnikom je treba pred začetkom potovanja zagotoviti ustrezne, popolne in razumljive informacije o novih pravicah, ki jim pripadajo.
(3c) Appropriate, full and comprehensible information on new rights being conferred on passengers should be provided to those passengers prior to their journey.
Ta predlog spremembe ponovno uvaja predlog spremembe 3 iz prve obravnave.
This amendment reintroduces Amendment 3 from the first reading.
Da se potnikom zagotovi visoko raven informacij o njihovih novih pravicah.
To guarantee a high standard of information for passengers on their new rights .
(3d) Vsaka sprememba atenske konvencije se vključi v zakonodajo Skupnosti, razen če je takšna sprememba izključena v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 5(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2099/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Odbora za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij (COSS) in o spremembi uredb o pomorski varnosti in preprečevanju onesnaževanja z ladij 1 .
(3d) Any amendment to the Athens Convention will be incorporated into Community legislation, unless that amendment is excluded following the procedure under Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 establishing a Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (COSS) and amending the Regulations on maritime safety and the prevention of pollution from ships 1 .
S tem predlogom spremembe se obnovi besedilo iz prvotnega predloga Komisije, kot ga je sprejel Evropski parlament.
This amendment restores the wording of the original Commission proposal as adopted by the European Parliament.
(12a) Zaradi potrebe po temeljitejšem posvetovanju med državami članicami o zadevah pomorske varnosti, je bistveno, da se ponovno oceni pristojnosti Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost in se morebiti razmisli o razširitvi njenih pooblastil.
(12a) Owing to the need for greater consultation among the Member States on matters of maritime safety, it is vital to reassess EMSA’s competences and possibly consider extending its powers.
Ta predlog spremembe ponovno uvaja predlog spremembe 4 iz prve obravnave.
This amendment reintroduces Amendment 4 from the first reading.
(12b) Nacionalni organi, zlasti pristaniški organi, imajo temeljno in odločilno vlogo pri prepoznavanju različnih tveganj, povezanih s pomorsko varnostjo, ter pri upravljanju z njimi.
(12b) The national authorities, particularly the port authorities, play a fundamental and vital role in identifying and managing the various risks in relation to maritime safety.
Ta predlog spremembe ponovno uvaja predlog spremembe 5 iz prve obravnave.
This amendment reintroduces Amendment 5 of the first reading.
Treba se je sklicevati na temeljno vlogo, ki jo igrajo nacionalni organi ter zlasti pristaniški organi pri hitrem prepoznavanju različnih tveganj za pomorsko varnost ter pri njihovem nadzoru.
Reference should be made to the fundamental role played by national authorities and particularly the port authorities in the timely identification and management of the various risks to maritime safety.
(13) Da izpolnijo svoje obveznosti po tej uredbi, lahko države članice preučijo ratifikacijo Mednarodne konvencije o omejitvi odgovornosti za pomorske terjatve, 1976, kakor je bila spremenjena s Protokolom iz leta 1996, in uporabijo možnost iz člena 15(3a) navedene konvencije, da s posebnimi določbami uredijo sistem omejitve odgovornosti, ki se uporablja za potnike.
(13) In order to fulfil their obligations under this Regulation, Member States may consider ratifying the International Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976, as amended by the Protocol of 1996, and make use of the option provided for in Article 15(3bis) of that Convention to regulate, by specific provisions of this Regulation, the system of limitation of liability to be applied to passengers.