natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu glede poenostavitve nekaterih zahtev in glede nekaterih določb, povezanih s finančnim poslovodenjem
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) N° 1083/2006 concerning general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund as regards simplification of certain requirements and as regards certain provisions relating to financial management
Pripravljavec mnenja: Ivars Godmanis
Rapporteur: Ivars Godmanis
Komisija je julija 2009 predstavila predlog o spremembi osnovne uredbe o strukturnih skladih, Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2003.
In July 2009, the Commission presented a proposal amending the basic regulation on structural funds, Regulation (EC) 1083/2003.
Namen predloga je dodatno spodbuditi gospodarstvo v nekaterih državah članicah, ki jih je gospodarska kriza resno prizadela.
The aim of the proposal was to provide additional economic stimulus to certain Member States, which had seriously suffered from the economic crises.
Predlog je sledil evropskemu načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva, potem ko so bile leta 2009 izvedbene določbe osnovne Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2003 že spremenjene, da bi dopuščale več prožnosti pri vnaprejšnjih plačilih.
It followed the European Economic Recovery Plan, in the context which the implementing provisions of the basic regulation 1083/2006 had already been modified in 2009 to allow more flexibility with advance payments.
Komisija se je v predlogu primarno želela posvetiti posledicam finančne krize, torej problemu zaostrovanja kreditne politike in omejitvam v proračunski politiki.
The main element of the Commission proposal aimed to address consequences of the financial crisis, i.e. the problem of a tightened credit policy and the constraints on the budgetary policy.
Predlagana rešitev je uvedba začasne možnosti za države članice, ki imajo resne težave z denarnim tokom, da zahtevajo povračilo v višini 100 % za financiranje ukrepov na trgu dela v okviru Evropskega socialnega sklada, kar pomeni odstopanje od načela sofinanciranja.
The solution proposed was to introduce a temporary option for Member States suffering from severe cash-flow difficulties to have a possibility to request a 100% reimbursement for financing labour market measures under the European Social Fund, i.e. derogation from the principle of co-financing.
Ta izjema naj bi veljala za leti 2009 in 2010 ter naj bi po pričakovanjih spodbudila usposabljanje, nadgrajevanje strokovnega znanja in omogočanje visokokakovostnih pripravništev.
This exception was foreseen to be applicable in 2009 and 2010 and was expected to boost training, upgrading of skills and the provision of high-quality apprenticeships.
Poleg tega je Komisija predlagala številne ukrepe, ki naj bi še dodatno poenostavili izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
Moreover, the Commission proposed a number of measures to further simplify the implementation of Regulation (EC) 1083/2006.
Svet je predlog obravnaval jeseni 2009 in 20. novembra istega leta sprejel soglasno stališče.
The Council considered the proposal in the autumn 2009 and reached a unanimous position on 20 November.
Zavrnil je zamisel o začasnih stoodstotnih plačilih, vendar je potrdil ostale spremembe iz predloga Komisije.
It rejected the idea of temporary 100% payments, but endorsed other changes proposed by the Commission.
Z začetkom veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2009 se je zakonodajni postopek spremenil v prid Parlamentu: namesto postopka soglasja, v katerem bi Parlament imel zgolj možnost reči da ali ne, je pridobil polno pravico do razpravljanja o vsebini predloga v okviru rednega zakonodajnega postopka.
The entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009 entailed a change in the legislative procedure to Parliament's benefit: instead of the assent procedure, where Parliament was only able to say yes or no, Parliament acquired a full say in the content of the text in the ordinary legislative procedure.
Presoja proračunskih vidikov predloga
Consideration of the budgetary aspects of the proposal
Komisija je predlagala številne spremembe, katerih namen je poenostaviti pravila o izvajanju strukturnih skladov.
The Commission has proposed a number of changes which aim at simplifying the rules on the implementation of structural funds.
Najvidnejše spremembe zadevajo velike projekte, vključno z mejno vrednostjo, ki se uporablja zanje.
The most tangible changes relate to major projects, including the threshold that is being applied.
Če bo predlog sprejet, bo za vse velike projekte veljala zgolj ena mejna vrednost, 50 milijonov EUR (sedaj za okoljske projekte velja druga mejna vrednost, 25 milijonov EUR).
If the proposal is adopted, one single threshold, EUR 50 million, is applicable to all major projects (currently, there is a separate threshold for environmental projects, EUR 25 million).
Velike projekte pa bi bilo treba zavarovati tudi pred samodejnim prenehanjem.
Moreover, major projects should also be protected from automatic de-commitment.
Večina drugih sprememb je majhnih, vendar so odziv na pozive Parlamenta k poenostavitvi, na primer tiste pri usklajevanju proračuna novembra 2009.
Most of the other changes are fairly small, but they do respond to Parliament's calls for simplification, like those made in the budget conciliation in November 2009.
Parlament in Svet sta takrat sprejela skupno izjavo o poenostavitvi in bolj ciljno usmerjeni porabi strukturnih skladov.
The Parliament and the Council then adopted a joint declaration on the simplification and more targeted use of Structural Funds.
Zato se ukrepi poenostavitve, ki jih predlaga Komisija, lahko podprejo.
Therefore, the simplification measures proposed by the Commission can be supported.
Bolj zapleten je problem, ki zadeva predlog, da se začasno opusti obveznost sofinanciranja operativnih programov, financiranih iz ESS.
A more complicated problem relates to the proposal to waive temporarily the obligation of co-financing for operational programmes financed by ESF.
Predlog ne bi vplival na odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v letu 2010, bi pa začasno povečal odobritve plačil, če bi se države članice odločile, da izkoristijo priložnost za povračilo vmesnih plačil v višini 100 %.
It would not have any impact on commitment appropriations in 2010, but it would increase temporarily the payment appropriations, should Member States decide to use the opportunity for 100% reimbursement of the interim payments.
Zaradi predloga ne bi bile potrebne prilagoditve večletnega finančnega okvira, ker bi se „dodatna“ plačila EU leta 2010 pokrila, ko bi se izračunalo plačilo končnega zneska.
The proposal would not entail any modification of the multiannual financial framework, because the 'extra' payments by the EU in 2010 would be recuperated when calculating the payment of final balance.
Čeprav je splošni cilj – mobilizacija strukturnih skladov za uspešnejši spopad z gospodarsko in finančno krizo – v celoti skladen s stališčem Parlamenta, pa metoda, ki jo predlaga Komisija, dopušča dvome.
While the overall aim – the mobilisation of structural funds to better address the economic and financial crises – is fully compatible with Parliament’s position, the method proposed by the Commission leaves room for doubt.
Statistika razvoja plačil v strukturnih skladih kaže velike razlike med državami članicami, zlasti pri ESS (glej prilogo 1).
Statistics on the evolution of payments in structural funds show considerable differences between Member States, in particular as regards the ESF (see annex 1).
Enako je pri predložitvi opisov sistemov upravljanja in nadzora.
The same applies to the submission of descriptions for Management and Control Systems.
Razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so težave drugje, ne pri pridobivanju sofinanciranja, in sicer v zmogljivostih držav članic za upravljanje sredstev na nacionalni ravni.
The data available implies that the problems lay elsewhere than in finding co-financing, i.e. in Member States capacity to manage the funds at national level.
Celotno začasno financiranje s strani EU ne bi bilo skladno z načelom sofinanciranja in bi lahko povečalo tveganje za nepravilnosti.
A full, temporary financing by the EU would be against the principle of co-financing and could increase the risk for irregularities.
Dodatni stroški predloga Komisije bi znašali 4,1 milijarde EUR v letu 2010.
The additional cost of the Commission proposal would be EUR 4.1 billion in 2010.
To bi pomenilo 50-odstotno povišanje plačil ESS, vključenih v proračun, za leto 2010.
That would mean an increase of 50% to the budgeted ESF payments in 2010.
Žal v predlog Komisije ni vključena ocena učinka.
It is unfortunate that the Commission proposal does not contain an impact assessment.
Ni jasno, kakšni so pričakovani učinki in kaj bi bila resnična dodana vrednost.
It is not clear what the expected impacts are and what the real added value would be.
Svet je že zavrnil načelo stoodstotnega financiranja.
The Council has already rejected the principle of 100% financing.
Namesto tega je predlagal podaljšanje roka za izračun samodejnega prenehanja letne proračunske obveznosti, povezane s skupnim letnim prispevkom v letu 2007 za boljšo absorpcijo sredstev, namenjenih za nekatere operativne programe.
Instead, it has proposed the extension of the deadline for calculating the automatic de-commitment of the annual budget commitment related to 2007 total annual contribution to improve the absorption of funds committed for certain operational programmes.
Po mnenju Sveta je takšna prožnost potrebna, ker so se programi začeli izvajati pozneje, kot je bilo predvideno, in so bili zato pozneje odobreni.
It argues that such flexibility would be needed due to a slower than expected start-up and late approval of the operational programmes.
Za ublažitev gospodarskih razmer v državah, ki jih je gospodarska kriza najhuje prizadela, Svet tudi predlaga, da se povečajo vnaprejšnja plačila za operativne programe ESS in za Kohezijski sklad.
Moreover, to mitigate the economic situation in countries most seriously affected by economic crises, the Council also proposes to increase advance payments to operational programmes of ESF and for Cohesion Fund.
Države članice, ki jim je bila odobrena srednjeročna finančna pomoč v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 332/2002, in države članice, katerih BDP je v letu 2009 padel za več kot 10 % v primerjavi z letom 2008, bi bile upravičene do dodatnega vnaprejšnjega financiranja v višini 2 % iz Kohezijskega sklada in 4 % iz Evropskega socialnega sklada.
Member States that have been granted medium-term financial assistance in accordance with Regulation (EC) 332/2002 and Member States with a GDP decrease in 2009 of more than 10% compared to 2008, would be eligible for an extra pre-financing of 2% from Cohesion Fund and 4% from ESF.
V skladu s tem predlogom bi se po zgoraj navedenih pogojih vnaprejšnja plačila podaljšala do leta 2010.
This proposal would mean the extension of advance payments, under the abovementioned conditions, to 2010.
V sedanji uredbi za leto 2010 niso predvidena vnaprejšnja plačila.
Under the current regulation, no advance payments were foreseen for 2010.
Pripravljavec mnenja poudarja, da bi imelo pet držav koristi od predloga Sveta o vnaprejšnjih plačilih (glej prilogo 2).
Your rapporteur for opinion points out that five countries would benefit from the Council proposal on advance payments (see annex 2).
Skupni stroški tega ukrepa bi bili 0,776 milijarde EUR (0,4 milijarde EUR za Kohezijski sklad in 0,3776 milijarde EUR za ESS).
The total cost of this measure would be EUR 0.776 billion (EUR 0.4 billion for Cohesion Fund and EUR 0.3776 billion for ESF).
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da je pristop Sveta skladen z zahtevami Parlamenta po poenostavitvi in prožnosti.
Your rapporteur for opinion considers that the Council approach responds to Parliament's demands on simplification and flexibility.
Odlog prenehanja bi potencialno koristil vsem državam, vendar bi države z največjimi težavami imele korist od dodatnih vnaprejšnjih plačil.
All countries would potentially benefit from the postponement of de-commitment, but those countries in the most difficult situation would benefit from extra advance payments.
Predlogi sprememb, ki jih je vložil pripravljavec mnenja, upoštevajo to stališče.
The amendments tabled by your draftsman reflect this position.
Seveda ni potrebno poudarjati, da mora Komisija po sprejetju pravne podlage pripraviti ustrezen predlog za spremembo proračuna, ki ga bo proračunski organ preučil in sprejel.
It goes without saying, however, that after the adoption of the legal base, the Commission should make a corresponding proposal for an amending budget for the consideration and adoption by the budgetary authority.
1a. opozarja na izjavo Sveta z dne 10. julija 2009 o odobritvah plačil in poziva Komisijo, naj po potrebi predloži spremembo proračuna, ki bo pokrila potrebe po dodatnih odobritvah plačil za leto 2010;
Recalls the Council declaration of 10 July 2009 on payment appropriations and invites the Commission to submit an amending budget if needed to cover the needs for additional payment appropriations for 2010;
1b. podpira predlagano predvidevanje plačil, vendar poudarja, da je treba upoštevati splošno finančno načrtovanje; poudarja, da je treba o končnih zneskih za plačila v preostalem programskem obdobju odločati v letnem proračunskem postopku;
Supports the proposed frontloading of payments but underlines that the overall financial programming should be respected; recalls that the final amounts for payments during the remaining programming period should be decided in the annual budgetary procedure;
1c. poudarja, da bi možna odstopanja od pravila N+2 morala ostati izjema in se uporabljati zgolj za odobritve plačil za 2007;
Stresses that a possible derogation from the N+2 rule should remain exceptional and should apply only to the 2007 payment appropriations;
Predlog, da se začasno opusti obveznost sofinanciranja, ni sprejemljiv – niti začasno, ker povečuje tveganje za nepravilnosti in ni skladen s temeljnim načelom strukturne politike.
The proposal to waive the co-financing obligation is not acceptable, not event temporarily, since it increases the risk of irregularities and is against a basic principle of structural policy.
(10) Člen 77 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(10) A rticle 77 is replaced by the following:
„Člen 77
"Article 77
Vendar se ta razlika upošteva za namen določbe iz člena 79(1) in izračun plačila končnega zneska.“
However, this difference shall be taken into account for the purpose of the provision under Article 79(1) and for the calculation of the payment of the final balance."
Člen 82 – odstavek 1 – točka (e a) (novo)
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(11a) V členu 82(1), drugi pododstavek, se doda naslednja točka:
(11a) In Article 82(1), second subparagraph, the following point is added:
„(ea) za države članice, ki so jim bila v letu 2009 odobrena posojila v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z dne 18. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic*, ali države članice, katerih BDP je v letu 2009 realno padel za več kot 10 % v primerjavi z letom 2008: v letu 2010 2 % prispevka iz Kohezijskega sklada in 4 % prispevka iz Evropskega socialnega sklada za operativni program.
“(ea) for Member States that were granted loans in 2009 in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term assistance for Member States' balances of payments* or Member States with a GDP decrease in 2009 of more than 10 % in real terms in comparison to 2008: in 2010, 2 % of the contribution from the Cohesion Fund and 4 % of the contribution from the European Social Fund to the operational programme.
*UL L 53, 23.2.2002, str.
* OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p.
V času hude finančne krize je upravičeno nadaljevati vnaprejšnja plačila v Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem socialnem skladu za države, ki so v najobčutljivejšem gospodarskem položaju.
In the time of severe financial crisis, it is justifiable to continue with advance payments in the Cohesion fund and the Social Fund for countries which are in the most vulnerable economic situation.
Člen 82 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
(11b) V členu 82(1) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
(11b) In Article 82(1), the following subparagraph is added:
** Evropska gospodarska napoved za jesen 2009 (EUROPEAN ECONOMY, št. 10, 2009.
Office for Official Publications of the EC.
Člen 93 – odstavek 1
Article 93 – paragraph 1
(12a) Člen 93 se spremeni:
(12a) Article 93 is amended as follows:
(a) odstavek 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(a) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Komisija samodejno razveljavi vsak del zneska, izračunanega v skladu z drugim pododstavkom operativnega programa, ki ni bil uporabljen za plačilo vnaprejšnjega financiranja ali vmesnih plačil ali za katerega ni bil poslan zahtevek za plačilo v skladu s členom 86, do 31. decembra naslednjega leta po letu proračunske obveznosti po programu, razen v primeru iz odstavka 2.
The Commission shall automatically de-commit any part of the amount calculated in accordance with the second subparagraph in an operational programme that has not been used for payment of the pre-financing or interim payments or for which an application for payment has not been sent in conformity with Article 86 by 31 December of the second year following the year of budget commitment under the programme, with the exception mentioned in paragraph 2.
Zaradi samodejnega prenehanja znesek izračuna tako, da vsaki proračunski obveznosti med letoma 2008 do 2013 doda šestino letne proračunske obveznosti, povezane s skupnim letnim prispevkom v letu 2007.
For the purpose of the automatic de-commitment, the Commission shall calculate the amount by adding one sixth of the annual budget commitment related to 2007 total annual contribution to each of 2008 to 2013 budget commitments."
Z odložitvijo samodejnega prenehanja obveznosti, povezanega z obveznostmi iz leta 2007, se omogoči nekaj prožnosti, če je odobritev operativnih programov zahtevala več časa kot pričakovano.
Postponing the automatic de-commitment related to commitments made in 2007 gives some flexibility in a situation where the approval of operational programmes has been slow than expected.
Člen 93 – odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 93 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Ne glede na prvi pododstavek odstavka 1 in odstavek 2 roki za samodejno prenehanje prevzetih obveznosti ne veljajo za letne proračunske obveznosti, povezane s skupnim letnim prispevkom v letu 2007.“
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, first subparagraph, and paragraph 2, the deadlines for automatic de-commitment shall not apply to the annual budget commitment related to 2007 total annual contribution."
Proračunska sredstva, ki so bila črtana zaradi prenehanja prevzetih obveznosti s strani Komisije za finančno leto 2007 v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 93(1) in členom 97 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 ter členom 11 finančne uredbe, se zaradi izrednih okoliščin prehoda na predpise o prenehanju prevzetih obveznosti , uvedene s to uredbo, odobrijo v višini, ki je potrebna za izvajanje drugega pododstavka člena 93(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
In order to meet the exceptional circumstances of the transition to the de-commitment rules introduced by this Regulation, appropriations which have been cancelled because of de-commitments made by the Commission for the financial year 2007 in the implementation of the first subparagraph of Article 93(1) and Article 97 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, pursuant to Article 11 of the Financial Regulation, shall be reconstituted to the extent necessary for the implementation of the second subparagraph of Article 93(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
Splošne določbe o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu glede poenostavitve nekaterih zahtev in določb, ki zadevajo finančno poslovodenje
General provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund as regards simplification of certain requirements and as regards certain provisions relating to financial management
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu glede poenostavitve nekaterih zahtev in glede nekaterih določb, povezanih s finančnim poslovodenjem
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund as regards simplification of certain requirements and as regards certain provisions relating to financial management
Glede na sedanjo gospodarsko in finančno krizo je Svet Evropske unije 11. in 12. decembra 2008 sprejel evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva, ki predvideva uvedbo prednostnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi se evropskim gospodarstvom omogočila hitrejša prilagoditev sedanjim izzivom.
In the context of the current economic and financial crisis, the Council of the European Union of 11 and 12 December 2008 agreed on a European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP), which envisages the initiation of priority action to enable European economies to adjust more rapidly to current challenges.
Komisija je v okviru svojega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva septembra 2008 in novembra 2008 že predlagala več regulativnih sprememb, da bi poenostavila izvedbene določbe za kohezijsko politiko in povečala vnaprejšnje financiranje (vnaprejšnja plačila) za programe Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Evropskega socialnega sklada.
In its recovery package, the Commission had already proposed a number of regulatory changes in September 2008 and November 2008 in order to simplify the implementation rules for cohesion policy and to increase the pre-financing (advance payments) to ERDF and ESF programmes.
Komisija je 3. junija 2009 predložila sporočilo z naslovom „Skupna zaveza za zaposlovanje“, v katerem se predlagajo dodatni ukrepi za povečanje števila delovnih mest in boj proti učinkom krize na delovna mesta.
On 3 June 2009, the Commission presented a communication on 'A Shared Commitment for Employment' in which additional measures were proposed in order to boost job creation and counter the effects of the crisis on jobs.
Komisija meni, da so potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja za lažje upravljanje finančnih sredstev Skupnosti, da se zagotovi hitrejši tok finančnih sredstev k upravičencem, ki jih je gospodarska recesija najbolj prizadela.
The Commission considers that more effort is needed to facilitate the management of the Community funding in order to speed up the flow of the funding to the beneficiaries that are most affected by the economic downturn.
Ta predlog, sprejet 22. julija 2009, zato vključuje dodatne elemente za poenostavitev s splošnim ciljem hitrejšega izvajanja sofinanciranih naložb v državah članicah in regijah ter večjega vpliva finančnih sredstev na gospodarstvo kot celoto, zlasti na mala in srednja podjetja ter zaposlovanje.
The current proposal, adopted on 22 July 2009, therefore includes additional elements of simplification, with the overall objective of streamlining co-financed investments in Member States and regions and of increasing the impact of the funding on the whole economy, and in particular on small and medium-sized enterprises and on employment.
Mala in srednja podjetja so gibalo evropskega gospodarstva in glavni dejavniki trajnostne rasti ter ustvarjajo številna kakovostna delovna mesta.
Small and medium-sized enterprises are the motor of the European economy and the main producers of sustainable growth, creating numerous quality jobs.
V Evropski uniji približno 23 milijonov malih in srednjih podjetij predstavlja skoraj 99 % njenih podjetij in je odgovornih za približno 75 milijonov delovnih mest.
In the EU, some 23 million SMEs constitute 99% of EU businesses and account for some 75 million jobs.