natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2008/651/CFSP/PNZ z dne 30. junija 2008 o podpisu sporazuma v imenu Evropske unije med Evropsko unijo in Avstralijo o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov iz podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR) Evropske unije s strani letalskih prevoznikov avstralski carinski službi
– having regard to Council Decision 2008/651/CFSP/JHA of 30 June 2008 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Union and Australia on the processing and transfer of European Union-sourced passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Australian Customs Service
UL L 213, 8.8.2008, str.
OJ L 213, 8.8.2008, p.
47. , ter ob upoštevanju samega sporazuma,
47. and to the Agreement itself,
– ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je skladno s členom 25 Pogodbe o EU ta sporazum sedaj začasno zavezujoč le za tiste države članice, ki niso dale izjave, da morajo ravnati v skladu z lastnimi notranjepravnimi postopki, kot so to storile Belgija, Češka republika, Nemčija, Irska, Latvija, Malta, Nizozemska, Madžarska, Poljska in Finska
– having regard to the fact that according to TEU Article 25, that Agreement is currently binding on a provisional basis only on those Member States which did not issue statements to the effect that they had to comply with their own constitutional procedure, as did Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Malta, the Netherlands, Hungary, Poland and Finland
Nekatere države članice so sprejele posebne izjave, ki so objavljene v zapisniku Sveta in dostopne na naslednjem naslovu: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/08/st10/st10439.en08.pdf ,
Some of the MS adopted specific declarations published in the Council Minutes and accessible at the following address: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/08/st10/st10439.en08.pdf ,
– ob upoštevanju dejstva, da bi pravna podlaga, izbrana za zgoraj omenjeni Sklep Sveta, s katerim je bil sklenjen sporazum, namreč člena 38 in 24 Pogodbe o EU (slednji se nanaša na zunanje odnose), zahtevala, da se predsedstvo posvetuje s Parlamentom v zvezi z glavnimi vidiki in temeljnimi odločitvami skupne zunanje in varnostne politike,
– having regard to the fact that the legal base chosen for the above-mentioned Council Decision concluding the Agreement, namely TEU Articles 38 and 24 (the latter of which refers to external relations), would require the Presidency to consult Parliament on the main aspects and the basic choices of the common foreign and security policy,
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij in priporočil glede vprašanju podatkov PNR
– having regard to its previous resolutions and recommendations on the PNR issue
2003 o prenosu osebnih podatkov s strani letalskih družb v primerih čezoceanskih letov: stanje pogajanj z ZDA (UL C 81 E, 31.3.2004, str.
381), of 9 October 2003 on transfer of personal data by airlines in the case of transatlantic flights: state of negotiations with the USA (OJ C 81 E, 31.3.2004, p.
105), z dne 31. marca 2004 o osnutku odločbe Komisije, ki ugotavlja ustrezno raven zaščite, ki je zagotovljena za osebne podatke, vključene v evidenco imen letalskih potnikov (PNR), ki je bila posredovana Uradu ZDA za carine in zaščito meja (UL C 103 E, 29.4.2004, str.
105) and of 31 March 2004 on the draft Commission decision noting the adequate level of protection provided for personal data contained in the Passenger Name Records (PNRs) transferred to the US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (OJ C 103 E, 29.4.2004, p.
665), priporočilo z dne 7. septembra 2006 o pogajanjih za sklenitev sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o uporabi evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR) za boj proti terorizmu in mednarodnemu kriminalu, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom, ter za njihovo preprečevanje (UL C 305 E, 14.12.2006, str.
665), recommendation of 7 September 2006 to the Council on the negotiations for an agreement with the United States of America on the use of passenger name records (PNR) data to prevent and combat terrorism and transnational crime, including organised crime (OJ C 305 E, 14.12.2006, p.
250), in zakonodajna resolucija z dne 7. julija 2005 o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in kanadsko vlado o obdelavi podatkov o letalskih potnikih (API/PNR) (OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p.
250) and legislative resolution of 7 July 2005 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Canada on the processing of Advance Passenger Information (API)/Passenger Name Record (PNR) data (OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 8(2) Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter členov 3(2) in 6 (1) Direktive 2004/82/ES o dolžnosti prevoznikov, da posredujejo podatke o potnikih
– having regard to Article 8(2) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and Article 3(2) and Article 6 (1) of Council Directive 2004/82/EC of 29 April 2004 on the obligation of carriers to communicate passenger data
Odbor LIBE se je seznanil s temi pogajanji tudi na podlagi mnenja delovne skupine za varstvo podatkov iz člena 29 glede tega vprašanja.
The LIBE Committee took note of the these negotiations also on the basis of the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party's opinion on this subject.
– ker bi moral Parlament kljub nepripravljenosti ostalih institucij zavzeti stališče o zadevi, ki vpliva na temeljne pravice državljanov in o kateri trenutno poteka razprava, ali naj se jo uredi z zakonodajo EU,
– considering that notwithstanding the unwillingness of the other institutions, Parliament should take a position on a matter which affects the fundamental rights of citizens and which is also currently under discussion as a possible subject for EU legislation,
– ob upoštevanju členov 114(3) in 83(5) ter 94 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 114(3) and Rules 83(5) and 94 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0403/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0403/2008 ),
O postopkovnih vidikih
On procedural aspects
(a) meni, da postopku, ki je bil uporabljen pri sklenitvi sporazuma, primanjkuje demokratične legitimnosti, saj v nobeni fazi ni bilo omembe vrednega demokratičnega pregleda ali odobritve parlamenta; opaža, da Svet rutinsko izbira ta postopek za sklepanje mednarodnih sporazumov, ki vplivajo na temeljne pravice državljanov Evropske unije;
(a) considers that the procedure followed for the conclusion of the Agreement lacks democratic legitimacy, as at no stage there was any meaningful democratic scrutiny or Parliamentary approval; notes that the Council routinely chooses this procedure for the conclusion of international agreements that affect the fundamental rights of European Union citizens;
(b) ugotavlja, da se kljub večkratnim zahtevam Parlament v nobeni fazi ni obveščal ali se ni z njim posvetovalo glede sprejetja mandata, vodenja pogajanj ali sklenitve sporazuma; zato meni, da postopek, ki ga uporablja Svet, ne upošteva člena 24 Pogodbe o EU, pa tudi ne načel o lojalnem sodelovanju;
(b) notes that despite its repeated requests, Parliament has at no point been informed or consulted on the adoption of the mandate, conduct of the negotiations or the conclusion of the Agreement; and accordingly considers that the procedure followed by the Council does not comply with TEU Article 24, or with the principles of loyal cooperation;
(c) ugotavlja, da se le v desetih od 27 držav članic zahteva odobritev nacionalnega parlamenta, sprememb pa sploh ni mogoče predlagati; meni, da je ta postopek popolnoma neustrezen in ugotavlja, da bodo prihodnje spremembe pogojev sporazuma izvedene brez odobritve nacionalnega parlamenta;
(c) notes that national parliamentary approval is required in only ten out of the 27 EU Member States, without there being any possibility of proposing any modifications; considers this procedure to be totally inadequate; and notes that future modifications of the terms of the Agreement will be made without national parliamentary approval;
(d) še dalje dvomi o pravni podlagi, ki jo je Svet izbral za mednarodni sporazum, ki je osredotočen izključno na notranje potrebe neke tretje države po varnosti in nima nobene dodane vrednosti za varnost EU, njenih držav članic ali državljanov EU; zato si pridržuje pravico, da poseže v postopek pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti, če bi tretja stran postavila pod vprašaj legitimnost sporazuma;
(d) remains in doubt as to the legal basis chosen by the Council for an international agreement which is focused purely on the internal security needs of a third State and which has no added value as far as the security of the EU, of its Member States or of EU citizens is concerned; therefore reserves its right to intervene before the Court of Justice of the European Communities in the event of the legitimacy of the Agreement being called into question by a third party;
(e) poziva Svet in Komisijo, da pri sprejemanju mandata za pogajanja in sklenitev morebitnih prihodnjih sporazumov o prenosu osebnih podatkov, zlasti pri najnovejših pogovorih z Južno Korejo o prenosu osebnih podatkov, v celoti vključita Parlament in nacionalne parlamente;
(e) calls on the Council and the Commission to fully involve Parliament and national parliaments in the adoption of a mandate for negotiations and the conclusion of any future agreements on the transfer of personal data, particularly the current talks with South Korea on the transfer of PNR data;
O področju uporabe in namenu
On scope and purpose
(f) opaža, da se v celotnem besedilu omenja širok izbor ciljev ter da se drug ob drugem uporabljajo različni termini:
(f) notes that throughout the text a wide range of purposes is mentioned, and different terms are used side by side:
- preprečevanje „terorizma in z njim povezanih kaznivih dejanj in drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj, ki so po naravi mednarodna, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom (uvod),
- 'the fight against 'terrorism and related crimes and other serious crimes, including organised crime, that are transnational in nature' (introduction),
- „strogo za namen preprečevanja in boja proti“ terorizmu in z njim povezanimi kaznivimi dejanji (člen 5(1)(i)); hudim kaznivim dejanjem, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom, ki so po naravi mednarodna (člen 5(1)(ii)),
- 'strictly for the purpose of preventing and combating' terrorism and related crimes (Article 5(1)(i)) and other serious crimes, including organised crime, that are transnational in nature (Article 5(1)(ii)),
- izogibanju sodnim nalogom ali prijetju zaradi zgoraj navedenih kaznivih dejanj (člen 5(1)(iii)),
- flight from warrants or custody for the crimes described above (Article 5(1)(iii)),
- za zaščito javne varnosti ter za namene kazenskega pregona (uvod),
- to safeguard public security and law enforcement (introduction),
- carina, priseljevanje in kriminal (sklicevanja na zadevne akte v uvodu),
- customs, immigration and crime (references to respective Acts in introduction),
- „tudi v posameznem primeru“, kadar je to potrebno za zaščito ključnih interesov posameznika, na katerega se podatki nanašajo, ali drugih oseb, zlasti, če so ti posamezniki ali druge osebe v življenjski nevarnosti oziroma jim grozi huda poškodba, (člen 5(2)),
- 'on a case by case basis' where necessary for the protection of the vital interest of the data subject or other persons, in particular as regards the risk of death or serious injury to the data subject or others (Article 5(2)),
- veliko tveganje za javno zdravje (člen 5(2)),
- a significant public health risk (Article 5(2)),
- nadzora in odgovornosti javne uprave, vključno z zahtevami v okviru Zakona o svobodi informiranja, Zakona o Komisiji za človekove pravice in enake možnosti, Zakona o zasebnosti, Zakona o vrhovnem revizorju ali Zakona o varuhu človekovih pravic (člen 5(3));
- supervision and accountability of public administration, including requirements under the Freedom of Information Act, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission Act, the Privacy Act, the Auditor General Act, or the Ombudsman Act (Article 5(3));
(g) zato meni, da je omejitev namena popolnoma neustrezna ter da je zaradi tega nemogoče ugotoviti, ali so ukrepi upravičeni in sorazmerni; meni, da zaradi naštetih razlogov sporazum ne upošteva standardov EU in mednarodnih standardov o varstvu podatkov, prav tako pa ni skladen s členom 8 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ki zahteva natančno omejitev namena; na podlagi tega ocenjuje, da bi bilo mogoče sporazum pravno izpodbijati;
(g) considers therefore that the purpose limitation is totally inadequate, making it impossible to establish if the measures are justified and proportional; and that as a result, the Agreement fails to meet EU and international data protection standards, or comply with Article 8 of the ECHR, which requires a precise purpose limitation; considers that this leaves the Agreement open to legal challenge;
O varstvu podatkov
On Data Protection
(h) odobrava dejstvo, da se bo avstralski Zakon o zasebnosti v celoti uporabljal za državljane EU, je pa zaskrbljen zaradi izjem in izvzetij, zaradi katerih bi lahko bili državljani EU deležni nepopolnega pravnega varstva; meni, da bi moral sporazum poleg avstralskih zakonov o varstvu podatkov v celoti upoštevati tudi in predvsem zakone EU; vztraja, da zgolj upoštevanje sporazuma ne more nadomestiti formalne ugotovitve o primernosti, in da ni dovolj, da imajo zakoni, politike in načela Evropske unije in Avstralije o zaščiti podatkov skupne temelje;
(h) welcomes the fact that the Australian Privacy Act will apply unabridged to EU citizens, but is concerned about any exceptions and exemptions that may leave EU citizens with incomplete legal protection; believes that the Agreement should be fully compliant not only with Australian data protection laws, but also and primarily with EU laws; insists that mere compliance with the Agreement cannot replace a formal adequacy finding, and that it is not sufficient that European Union and Australian data protection laws, policies and principles share a common base;
(i) odobrava odločitev, da se skupine podatkov razkrijejo le, če anonimizirane;
(i) welcomes the decision to disclose data in bulk only when anonymised;
(j) glede pravic posameznikov, na katere se podatki nanašajo, sporazum določa, da bo Avstralija zagotovila sistem, ki bo dostopen posameznikom ne glede na njihovo državljanstvo ali državo prebivališča, da bodo lahko uresničevali svoje pravice; kar se tiče informiranja potnikov bi bilo dobrodošlo, če bi bili na carini pripravljeni informirati javnost o obdelavi podatkov iz PNR;
(j) notes, with regard to the rights of the data subjects, that the Agreement provides that Australia shall provide a system, accessible by individuals regardless of their nationality or country of residence, for individuals to exercise their rights; with a view to informing passengers, the willingness of Customs to inform the public regarding the processing of PNR data should be welcome;
(k) z razliko od sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o obdelavi in prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR) s strani letalskih prevoznikov Ministrstvu Združenih držav za domovinsko varnost (MDV) (Sporazum PNR iz leta 2007)
(k) remarks that, unlike the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (2007 PNR Agreement)
UL L 204, 4.8.2007, str.
OJ L 204, 4.8.2007, p.
18. obstaja določba o mehanizmu za reševanje sporov v primeru, da se pojavi spor med državami podpisnicami avstralskega sporazuma, kadar obstaja precejšnja verjetnost kršenja določb sporazuma, pa organi EU za varstvo podatkov lahko uporabijo obstoječa pooblastila in prekinejo prenos podatkov, da bi s tem zavarovali posameznike, katerih osebni podatki se obdelujejo;
18. , in the event of a dispute arising between the parties to the Australian Agreement there is provision for a conflict resolution mechanism, and the EU data protection authorities may exercise their existing powers to suspend data flows to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data where there is a substantial likelihood that the provisions of the Agreement are being infringed;
(l) odobrava udeležbo organov za varstvo podatkov pri skupnem pregledu, vendar obžaluje, da ni bil trdno določen rok za takšen pregled; poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj zahtevata pregled pred junijem 2010 ter naj ugotovitve tega pregleda predstavita Parlamentu;
(l) welcomes the participation of the data protection authorities in the joint review, but regrets that no firm deadline has been set for such a review; calls on the Commission and the Council to request a review before June 2010, and to present the findings of that review to Parliament;
(m) glede nadaljnjega posredovanja podatkov odobrava dejstvo, da so možnosti za nadaljnje posredovanje podatkov omejene, zlasti zato, ker nadaljnje posredovanje podatkov poteka za vsak primer posebej, carina pa vodi evidenco o vseh razkritjih;
(m) welcomes, in relation to onward transfers, the fact that there are limited possibilities for onward transfers, in particular since onward transfers take only place on a case-by-case basis and Customs maintains a log of all disclosures;
(n) ugotavlja, da se skladno s členom 2(2) ne sme shraniti nobenih podatkov, v točki 12 priloge pa je omenjeno obdobje hrambe 5, 5 let; čeprav je to obdobje krajše kot v sporazumih z Združenimi državami, Parlament meni, da je nemogoče potrditi sorazmernost obdobja hrambe 5, 5 let, saj nameni hranjenja podatkov potnikov niso dovolj jasno opredeljeni;
(n) notes that according to Article 2(2) no data shall be stored, but that a retention period of 5,5 years is mentioned in the Annex, point 12; though shorter than in the agreements with the US, Parliament considers that the proportionality of a retention period of 5,5 years cannot be established, as the purposes for which passenger data are being stored are insufficiently specified;
(p) vztraja, da je izmenjava diplomatskih not nesprejemljiv način dopolnjevanja seznama služb in agencij, ki lahko dostopajo do podatkov iz PNR;
(p) insists that an exchange of diplomatic notes is an unacceptable method for amending the list of departments and agencies that may have access to PNR data;
3. opozarja Svet, da bi moral biti Parlament v primeru začetka veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe primerno udeležen pri pregledu vseh sporazumov o PNR;
Reminds the Council that in the event of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, Parliament should be associated on a fair basis with the review of all the PNR agreements;
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju večletnega programa Skupnosti za zaščito otrok, ki uporabljajo internet in druge komunikacijske tehnologije
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual Community programme on protecting children using the Internet and other communication technologies
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................28
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................28
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................34
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ................................34
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................44
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................44
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................56
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ...56
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0106 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0106 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 153 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0092/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 153 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0092/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenj Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov, Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje, Odbora za proračun ter Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0404/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Culture and Education, the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, ( A6‑0404/2008 ),
(1) Prodor interneta in uporaba komunikacijskih tehnologij, kot so mobilni telefoni, v Skupnosti še vedno zelo naraščata in ponujata vsem državljanom velike priložnosti, kot so udeležba, interaktivnost in ustvarjalnost.
(1) Internet penetration and the use of communication technologies such as mobile phones is still growing considerably in the Community and offers great opportunities, such as participation, interactivity and creativity, to all citizens alike.
Še naprej pa obstajajo tveganja za otroke in zlorabo tehnologij, zaradi spreminjajočih se tehnologij in socialnega vedenja pa še naprej nastajajo nova tveganja in zlorabe.
Risks to children and abuse of the technologies continue to exist and, because of changing technologies and societal behaviours, new risks and abuses continue to emerge.
Da bi spodbudili koriščenje priložnosti in pozitivnih učinkov, ki jih nudijo internet in druge spletne tehnologije, je treba sprejeti tudi ukrepe za spodbujanje varnejše uporabe.
In order to encourage exploitation of the opportunities and to take advantage of the positive benefits offered by the Internet and other online technologies, measures are also needed to promote their safer use.
Vendar še naprej obstajajo tveganja za otroke in zlorabo tehnologij, zaradi spreminjajočih se tehnologij in socialnega vedenja pa še naprej nastajajo nova tveganja in zlorabe.
However, risks to children and abuse of the technologies continue to exist and, because of changing technologies and societal behaviours, new risks and abuses continue to emerge.
Na ravni EU je treba sprejeti ukrepe, da se zaščiti telesna, duševna in moralna integriteta otrok, ki bi jim dostop do neprimernih vsebin lahko škodoval.
Measures need to be adopted at EU level in order to protect the physical, mental and moral integrity of children, which might be impaired by their accessing inappropriate content.
Da bi spodbudili koriščenje priložnosti in pozitivnih učinkov, ki jih nudijo internet in druge komunikacijske tehnologije, je poleg tega treba sprejeti tudi ukrepe za spodbujanje varnejše uporabe.
Moreover, in order to encourage exploitation of the opportunities and to take advantage of the positive benefits offered by the Internet and other communication technologies, measures are also needed to promote their safer use.
(4) Še naprej bo obstajala potreba po ukrepih na področju vsebin, potencialno škodljivih za otroke, in na področju nezakonitih vsebin, zlasti gradiv z zlorabo otrok.
(4) There will be a continued need for action both in the area of content potentially harmful to children and in the area of illegal content, particularly child abuse material.
Enako velja za otroke, ki postanejo žrtve škodljivega in nezakonitega vedenja, kar privede do telesne in psihološke škode, in za otroke, ki so zavedeni v posnemanje takšnega ravnanja, s čimer škodujejo sebi in drugim.
The same applies to children becoming victims of harmful and illegal conduct leading to physical and psychological harm and to children being enticed to imitate such conducts causing harm to themselves and others.