natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(ba) predmeti, dokumenti ali podatki naj bi bili v postopku, v okviru katerega se zahtevajo, dopustni.
(ba) the objects, documents or data are likely to be admissible in the proceedings for which they are sought.
S pridobivanjem dokazov, ki v postopku, ki poteka, ne bi bili dopustni, ne bi olajšali medsebojne pomoči, temveč bi pravosodju nalagali dodatno delo.
The collection of evidence that is not admissible in the procedure concerned would simply encumber the work of the judicial authorities instead of facilitating mutual assistance.
Člen 7 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 7 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Odreditveni organ v nalogu zagotovi, da so izpolnjeni pogoji iz prvega pododstavka.
The issuing authority shall certify in the warrant that the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 have been fulfilled.
Za lažje izvajanje naloga mora odreditveni organ v obrazcu jasno zagotoviti, da so pogoji za odreditev izpolnjeni.
In order to facilitate execution of the warrant, the issuing authority must clearly certify in the relevant form that the conditions for its issue have been fulfilled.
Vsaka država članica lahko imenuje centralni organ ali, kadar tako določa njen pravni sistem, več centralnih organov za pomoč pristojnim organom.
Each Member State may designate a central authority or, when its legal system so provides, more than one central authority to assist the competent authorities.
Država članica lahko, kadar je to potrebno zaradi notranje organiziranosti njenega pravosodnega sistema, sklene, da bo (bodo) njen(i) centralni organ(i) odgovoren(ni) za administrativno pošiljanje in prejemanje EDN in za vso s tem povezano uradno korespondenco.
A Member State may, if necessary as a result of the organisation of its internal judicial system, make its central authority(ies) responsible for the administrative transmission and reception of the EEW as well as for other official correspondence relating thereto.
Da bi bilo vzajemno priznavanje učinkovito, je treba dajati prednost neposrednim stikom med pravosodnimi organi in zmanjšati vmešavanje centralnih organov.
In order to be effective, mutual recognition must place the emphasis on direct contact between judicial authorities and limit intrusion by the central authorities.
Člen 10 – odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 10 - paragraph 3 a (new)
Če odreditveni organ ni sodnik, sodišče, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec in če EDN ni potrdil noben izmed teh organov v državi izdajateljici, lahko izvršitveni organ v konkretnem primeru odloči, da se za izvršitev EDN ne smeta opraviti preiskava ali zaseg.
If the issuing authority is not a judge, a court, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor and the EEW has not been validated by one of those authorities in the issuing State, the executing authority may, in the specific case, decide that no search or seizure may be carried out for the purpose of the execution of the EEW.
Pred takšno odločitvijo se izvršitveni organ posvetuje s pristojnim organom države izdajateljice.
Before so deciding, the executing authority shall consult the competent authority of the issuing State.
Ta predlog spremembe izhaja iz predloga spremembe člena 2(c).
Amendment arising from the amendment to Article 2(c)
Država članica lahko ob sprejetju tega okvirnega sklepa poda izjavo oziroma generalni sekretariat Sveta pozneje obvesti, da zahteva tako potrditev v vseh primerih, kadar organ izdajatelj ni sodnik, sodišče, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec in kadar bi moral potrebne ukrepe za izvršitev EDN po zakonodaji države izvršiteljice v podobnem domačem primeru odrediti ali nadzirati sodnik, sodišče, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec.
A Member State may, at the time of adoption of this Framework Decision, make a declaration or subsequent notification to the General Secretariat of the Council requiring such validation in all cases where the issuing authority is not a judge, a court, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor and where the measures necessary to execute the EEW would have to be ordered or supervised by a judge, a court, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor under the law of the executing State in a similar domestic case.
Ta predlog spremembe izhaja iz predloga spremembe člena 2(c).
Amendment arising from the amendment to Article 2(c).
Jamstva v zvezi z izvršitvijo
Safeguards for execution
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne predpise, da se EDN izvrši v skladu z naslednjimi minimalnimi pogoji:
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the European Evidence Warrant is executed in accordance with the following minimum conditions:
a) izvršitveni organ uporablja kar najmanj vsiljiva sredstva za pridobitev predmetov, dokumentov ali podatkov;
(a) the executing authority shall use the least intrusive means necessary to obtain the objects, documents or data ;
b) od fizične osebe se ne zahteva, da predloži predmete, dokumente ali podatke, ki bi lahko povzročile samoobtožbo v skladu z zakonodajo države izdajateljice ali države izvršiteljice; in
(b) a natural person shall not be required to produce objects, documents or data which may result in self-incrimination under the legislation of the issuing State or the executing State; and
c) odreditveni organ se nemudoma obvesti, če izvršitveni organ ugotovi, da je bil nalog izvršen neskladno z zakoni države izvršiteljice.
(c) the issuing authority shall be informed immediately if the executing authority discovers that the warrant was executed in a manner contrary to the law of the executing State .
Kadar se preiskava in zaseg zdita nujna za pridobitev predmetov, dokumentov ali podatkov, vsaka država članica ukrene vse potrebno, da nudi naslednja minimalna jamstva:
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, where a search and seizure is considered necessary in order to obtain objects, documents or data, the following minimum safeguards shall apply :
a) preiskava prostorov se ne prične ponoči, razen če je to izjemoma nujno zaradi posebnih okoliščin primera;
(a) a search of premises shall not start at night, unless this is exceptionally necessary due to the particular circumstances of the case ;
b) oseba, katere prostori se preiščejo, ima pravico do pisnega obvestila o preiskavi.
(b) a person whose premises have been searched shall be entitled to receive written notification of the search.
V njem morajo biti navedeni vsaj razlog preiskave, predmeti, dokumenti ali podatki, ki so zaseženi, in pravna sredstva, ki so ji na voljo; in
This shall state, as a minimum, the reason for the search, the objects, documents or data seized, and the legal remedies available ; and
c) v odsotnosti osebe, katere prostori se preiskujejo, se obvestilo iz točke (b) tej osebi dostavi tako, da se pusti v prostorih ali na kakšen drug primeren način.
(c) in the absence of the person whose premises are being searched, the notification described in point (b) shall be provided to that person by leaving the notification on the premises or by other suitable means.
Do sprejetja široko zastavljenega instrumenta s področja postopkovnih jamstev, je treba določiti vsaj minimalna postopkovna jamstva, ki zadevajo izvrševanje EDN.
Pending the adoption of a far‑reaching instrument in the field of procedural safeguards, it would be appropriate to establish, at the least, minimum procedural safeguards concerning execution of the European Evidence Warrant.
Izvršitveni organ izpolni vse formalnosti in postopke, ki jih odreditveni organ izrecno navede, razen če ta okvirni sklep določa drugače in če te formalnosti in postopki niso v nasprotju s temeljnimi pravnimi načeli države izvršiteljice.
The executing authority shall comply with the formalities and procedures expressly indicated by the issuing authority unless otherwise provided in this Framework Decision and provided that such formalities and procedures are not contrary to the fundamental principles of law of the executing State.
Ta člen ne uvaja obveznosti za uvedbo prisilnih ukrepov.
This Article shall not create an obligation to take coercive measures.
Brez poseganja v člen 11a izvršitveni organ izpolni vse formalnosti in postopke, ki jih odreditveni organ izrecno navede, razen če ta okvirni sklep določa drugače in če te formalnosti in postopki niso v nasprotju s temeljnimi pravnimi načeli države izvršiteljice.
Without prejudice to Article 11a, the executing authority shall comply with the formalities and procedures expressly indicated by the issuing authority unless otherwise provided in this Framework Decision and provided that such formalities and procedures are not contrary to the fundamental principles of law of the executing State.
Do sprejetja široko zastavljenega instrumenta s področja postopkovnih jamstev, je treba določiti vsaj minimalna postopkovna jamstva, ki zadevajo izvrševanje EDN.
Pending the adoption of a far‑reaching instrument in the area of procedural safeguards, it would be appropriate to establish, at the least, minimum procedural safeguards concerning execution of the European Evidence Warrant.
Člen 12 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 12 - subparagraph 1 a (new)
Poleg tega odreditveni organ lahko zahteva, da izvršitveni organ:
The issuing authority may also require the executing authority to:
a) zavaruje zaupnost preiskave in njene vsebine, razen kolikor to ni mogoče za izvrševanje naloga;
(a) preserve the confidentiality of the investigation and its substance except to the extent necessary for the execution of the warrant;
b) omogoči pristojnemu organu države izdajateljice ali zainteresirani stranki, ki jo imenuje odreditveni organ, da je prisotna pri izvrševanju naloga in da ima dostop do vseh predmetov, dokumentov in podatkov, pridobljenih ob tej priložnosti, pod enakimi pogoji kot izvršitveni organ;
(b) allow a competent authority from the issuing State or an interested party designated by the issuing authority to be present at the execution of the warrant and to have access, under the same conditions as the executing authority, to any object, document or item of data obtained on that occasion;
c) deponira imena oseb, ki so bile v stiku z dokazi od izvršitve naloga do njihovega prenosa v državo izdajateljico.
(c) deposit the names of the people through whose hands the evidence has passed between the execution of the warrant and its transfer to the issuing State.
Člen 13 – odstavek 1 – točka a a (novo)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) če za kaznivo dejanje, na katerem temelji, v državi članici izvršiteljici velja amnestija, kadar je ta država pristojna za pregon tega dejanja po svojem kazenskem pravu;
(aa) if the offence on which it is based is covered by amnesty in the executing Member State, where that State had jurisdiction to prosecute the offence under its own criminal law;
To določbo je Parlament dodal na zasedanju leta 2004.
This clause was added by the plenary in 2004.
Člen 13 – odstavek 1 – točka a b (novo)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(ab) če oseba, ki je predmet EDN, po zakonodaji države članice izvršiteljice zaradi svoje starosti ne more biti kazensko odgovorna za dejanja, na katerih temelji ta nalog.
(ab) if the person who is the subject of the European evidence warrant may not, owing to his age, be held criminally responsible for the acts on which the evidence warrant is based under the law of the executing Member State ;
Člen 13 – odstavek 1 – točka e)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point (e)
e) če v enem izmed primerov iz člena 11(4) ali (5) EDN ni bil potrjen;
(e) if, in one of the cases referred to in Article 11(4) or (5), the EEW has not been validated;
Ta predlog spremembe izhaja iz predloga spremembe člena 11(4) in predloga spremembe člena 11(5).
Amendment arising from the amendment concerning Article 11(4) and (5).
Člen 13 – odstavek 1 – točka f)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point (f)
f) če se EDN nanaša na kazniva dejanja, ki:
(f) if the EEW relates to criminal offences which:
i) se po zakonodaji države izvršiteljice obravnavajo, kakor da so bila v celoti ali v poglavitnem ali bistvenem delu storjena na ozemlju države izvršiteljice ali na kraju, ki se kot tak šteje;
(i) under the law of the executing State are regarded as having been committed wholly or for a major or essential part within its territory, or in a place equivalent to its territory; or
ii) so bila storjena zunaj ozemlja države izvršiteljice, zakonodaja države izvršiteljice pa ne dovoljuje kazenskega pregona za ista kazniva dejanja, kadar so storjena zunaj njenega ozemlja.
(ii) were committed outside the territory of the issuing State, and the law of the executing State does not permit legal proceedings to be taken in respect of such offences where they are committed outside that State ’ s territory;
V instrumentu, ki temelji na vzajemnem priznavanju ni prostora za klavzulo o teritorialnosti.
A territoriality clause has no place in an instrument founded on mutual recognition.
Odločitev o zavrnitvi izvršitve ali priznanja EDN v skladu z odstavkom 1 sprejme sodnik, sodišče, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec države izvršiteljice.
The decision to refuse the execution or recognition of the EEW pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be taken by a judge, court, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor in the executing State.
Če je EDN izdal pravosodni organ iz člena 2(c)(ii) in ga ni potrdil sodnik, sodišče, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec države izdajateljice, lahko odločitev sprejme tudi kateri koli drug pravosodni organ, ki je pristojen v skladu z zakonodajo države izvršiteljice, če ta zakonodaja to omogoča.
Where the EEW has been issued by a judicial authority referred to in Article 2(c)(ii), and the EEW has not been validated by a judge, court, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor in the issuing State, the decision may also be taken by any other judicial authority competent under the law of the executing State if provided for under that law.
Ta predlog spremembe izhaja iz predloga spremembe člena 2(c).
Amendment arising from the amendment concerning Article 2, point (c).
Predlog spremembe izhaja iz črtanja klavzule o teritorialnosti.
Amendment resulting from the removal of the territoriality clause.
Če namerava pristojni organ uporabiti razlog za zavrnitev iz odstavka 1(f)(i), se pred sprejetjem odločitve posvetuje z Eurojustom.
Where a competent authority considers using the ground for refusal under paragraph 1(f)(i), it shall consult Eurojust before taking the decision.
Če se pristojni organ ne strinja z mnenjem Eurojusta, države članice zagotovijo, da bo svojo odločitev utemeljil ter da bo Svet o tem obveščen.
Where a competent authority is not in agreement with Eurojust ’ s opinion, Member States shall ensure that it give the reasons for its decision and that the Council be informed.
Člen 13 – odstavek 5
Article 13 – paragraph 5
V primerih iz odstavka 1(a), (aa), (ab), (g) in (h) se pristojni organ države izvršiteljice pred odločitvijo o popolnem ali delnem nepriznanju ali neizvršitvi EDN na primeren način posvetuje s pristojnim organom države izdajateljice in po potrebi prosi za takojšnje posredovanje potrebnih informacij.
In cases referred to in paragraph 1(a), (aa), (ab), (g) and (h), before deciding not to recognise or not to execute an EEW, either totally or in part, the competent authority in the executing State shall consult the competent authority in the issuing State, by any appropriate means, and shall, where appropriate, ask it to supply any necessary information without delay.
Predlog spremembe prilagaja določbo novemu besedilu člena 13.
Amendment bringing the clause into line with the rest of Article 13, as reformulated.
Člen 14 – odstavek 2 – uvodni del
Article 14 - paragraph 2 - introductory part
Če sta za izvršitev EDN potrebna preiskava ali zaseg, se v nobenem primeru ne bo preverjala dvojna kaznivost, če je nalog odrejen zaradi kaznivega dejanja za katero je po pravu države odreditve, kot najvišja mera kazni odvzema prostosti predpisan zapor najmanj treh let in gre po pravu te države za eno izmed naslednjih vrst kaznivih dejanj:
If it is necessary to carry out a search or seizure for the execution of the EEW, the following offences , if they are punishable in the issuing State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years and as they are defined by the law of that State, shall not be subject to verification of double criminality under any circumstances:
Če sta za izvršitev EDN potrebna preiskava ali zaseg, se v nobenem primeru ne bo preverjala dvojna kaznivost, če je nalog odrejen zaradi kaznivega dejanja in gre po pravu države izdajateljice za eno izmed naslednjih vrst kaznivih dejanj:
If it is necessary to carry out a search or seizure for the execution of the EEW, the following offences as they are defined by the law of the issuing State, shall not be subject to verification of double criminality under any circumstances:
Preverjanje dvojne kaznivosti bi moralo postopoma izginiti iz instrumentov, ki temeljijo na vzajemnem priznavanju.
Verification of double criminality should gradually disappear from instruments founded on mutual recognition.
Določba, ki se s tem predlogom spremembe črta, gre v nasprotno smer in ni bila predvidena v predlogu Evropske komisije.
The provision which this amendment removes is a step in the opposite direction and was not envisaged in the European Commission proposal .
Razen v primeru, da obstajajo razlogi za odložitev v skladu s členom 16 ali da izvršitveni organ z zahtevanimi predmeti, dokumenti ali podatki že razpolaga, izvršitveni organ prevzame predmete, dokumente ali podatke nemudoma oziroma , brez poseganja v odstavek 4, najpozneje v roku 60 dni po tem, ko je pristojni izvršitveni organ prejel EDN.
Unless either grounds for postponement under Article 16 exist or the executing authority has the objects, documents or data sought already in its possession, the executing authority shall take possession of the objects, documents or data without delay and, without prejudice to paragraph 4, no later than 60 days after the receipt of the EEW by the competent executing authority.
Razen v primeru, da eden od razlogov za odložitev v skladu s členom 16 to opravičuje ali da izvršitveni organ z zahtevanimi predmeti, dokumenti ali podatki že razpolaga, izvršitveni organ prevzame predmete, dokumente ali podatke čim prej oziroma najpozneje v roku 60 dni po tem, ko je pristojni izvršitveni organ prejel EDN, in sicer brez poseganja v odstavek 4 .
Unless one of the grounds for postponement under Article 16 justifies it or the executing authority has the objects, documents or data sought already in its possession, the executing authority shall take possession of the objects, documents or data as early as possible and no later than 60 days after the receipt of the European Evidence Warrant by the competent executing authority , without prejudice to paragraph 4 .
Člen 15 – odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 15 - paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a) Razen če je bilo vloženo pravno sredstvo v skladu s členom 18 ali obstajajo razlogi za odložitev v skladu s členom 16, država izvršiteljica posreduje predmete, dokumente ali podatke, pridobljene na podlagi evropskega dokaznega naloga, državi izdajateljici nemudoma, ko so ti pod nadzorom izvršitvenega organa, ali, če temu ni tako, čim prej in najpozneje v roku tridesetih dni po tem, ko je izvršitveni organ prevzel dokaze.
In the absence of an action brought in accordance with Article 18 and unless one of the grounds for postponement referred to in Article 16 justifies it, the executing State shall transfer to the issuing State the objects, documents or data obtained by virtue of the European Evidence Warrant, immediately where the latter are already under the control of the executing authority or, where this is not the case, as early as possible and no later than 30 days following the date on which the executing authority takes possession of the evidence.
Izvršitveni organ ob posredovanju pridobljenih predmetov, dokumentov ali podatkov navede, ali zahteva, da jih država izdajateljica vrne državi izvršiteljici takoj, ko jih ne potrebuje več.
When the objects, documents or data obtained are transferred, the executing authority shall state whether it requires them to be returned to the State of execution as soon as they cease to be needed by the issuing State.
Treba je tudi določiti skrajni rok za posredovanje predmetov, dokumentov ali podatkov, pridobljenih na podlagi evropskega dokaznega naloga.
It is also necessary to set a maximum deadline for the transfer of the objects, documents or data obtained under a European Evidence Warrant.
Poleg tega je razumno združiti v enem samem odstavku različne določbe glede posredovanja in odstavek prestaviti pred tistega, ki se nanaša na morebitno nezmožnost spoštovanja predvidenih rokov.
Also, it is more logical to put the various provisions relating to transfer together in one paragraph and to place this paragraph before the one relating to any inability to comply with the deadlines laid down.
Če se pristojni izvršitveni organ v posamičnem primeru ne more držati rokov, predpisanih v odstavku 2 oziroma 3 , o tem nemudoma na kakršen koli način obvesti pristojni organ države izdajateljice ter navede razloge za zamudo in predviden čas, v katerem bo lahko ukrepal.
When it is not practicable in a specific case for the competent executing authority to meet the deadline set out in paragraphs 2 or 3 respectively , it shall without delay inform the competent authority of the issuing State by any means , giving the reasons for the delay and the estimated time needed for the action to be taken.
Če se pristojni izvršitveni organ v izjemnih okoliščinah ne more držati rokov, predpisanih v tem členu , o tem nemudoma pisno obvesti Eurojust in pristojni organ države izdajateljice ter navede razloge za zamudo in predviden čas, v katerem bo lahko ukrepal.
When it is not practicable under exceptional circumstances for the competent executing authority to meet the deadline set out in this Article , it shall without delay inform Eurojust and the competent authority of the issuing State in writing , giving the reasons for the delay and the estimated time needed for the action to be taken.
Nespoštovanje predvidenih rokov je možno opravičiti le, če do njega pride v izjemnih okoliščinah.
Failure to meet deadlines can only be justified by exceptional circumstances.
O tem je treba obvestiti tudi Eurojust, posredovane informacije pa naj vsebujejo pisno zabeležbo o tem.
It is important that Eurojust also be warned and that there is a written record of the information transmitted.
Ta odstavek je zajet in dopolnjen v predlogu spremembe poslanke Lefrançois, katerega namen je v zadevni člen vključiti novi odstavek 13 a.
This paragraph is covered and supplemented by the Lefrançois amendment that aims to add a new paragraph 3a to this Article.
Zato glej obrazložitev tega predloga spremembe.
Please refer therefore to the justification for this amendment.
Izvršitveni organ ob posredovanju pridobljenih predmetov, dokumentov ali podatkov navede, ali zahteva, da jih država izdajateljica vrne državi izvršiteljici takoj, ko jih ne potrebuje več.
When transferring the objects, documents or data obtained, the executing authority shall indicate whether it requires them to be returned to the executing State as soon as they are no longer required by the issuing State.
Ta odstavek dobesedno povzema predlog spremembe poslanke Lefrançois, katerega namen je v zadevni člen vključiti novi odstavek 13 a.
This paragraph is incorporated verbatim by the Lefrançois amendment that aims to add a new paragraph 3a to this Article.
Člen 17 a
Article 17a
Nadaljnja uporaba dokazov
Subsequent use of evidence
Uporaba dokazov, pridobljenih v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom, ne sme v nadaljnjih kazenskih postopkih v nobenem primeru posegati v pravice obrambe.
The use of the evidence acquired pursuant to this Framework Decision shall in no way prejudice the rights of the defence in subsequent criminal proceedings.
Te pravice je treba v celoti spoštovati, zlasti z vidika dopustnosti dokazov, obveznosti izročanja dokazov obrambi in pravice obrambe, da dokaze izpodbija.
These rights shall be fully respected, in particular as regards the admissibility of the evidence, the obligation to disclose that evidence to the defence and the ability of the defence to challenge that evidence.