natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na ta način bi najbolj prispevala k socialni vključenosti in izboljšanju življenjskega standarda evropskih državljanov.
This way, it would contribute best towards social inclusion and improving the living standards of European citizens.
Obstaja potreba po okrepitvi nadzora nad politikami držav članic, s čimer bi izboljšali izpolnjevanje obveznosti v skladu z novo strategijo EU 2020.
There is a need for a strengthening of surveillance over Member States' policies in order to improve delivery on the commitments under the new EU 2020 strategy.
Pri tem je glavnega pomena to, da mora strategija EU 2020 opredeliti omejeno število ambicioznih ciljev po posameznih državah (vključno na notranjem trgu), ki bodo na ravni držav članic dobro sprejeti.
In this respect it is key that the EU 2020 strategy should lay out a limited number of ambitious and country-specific targets (including in the internal market), firmly owned at the level of Member States.
Nova strategija EU 2020 bo strukturni politiki in politiki zaposlovanja najbolj pomagala s tem, da ostane osredotočena na svoja glavna politična cilja, to pa sta dvig potencialne rasti in ustvarjanje visokih stopenj zaposlenosti.
The new EU 2020 strategy would best support structural and employment policies if it remains focused on the primary policy targets of raising potential growth and creating high levels of employment.
Poleg tega bi morala strategija vključevati tudi večjo soodvisnost med članicami euroobmočja in njihovo skupno odgovornost za delovanje euroobmočja ter s tem potrebo po tesnejši povezanosti in boljši usklajenosti gospodarskih in davčnih politik med članicami euroobmočja.
Furthermore, the strategy should incorporate the greater interdependence among euro area members and their shared responsibility for the functioning of the euro area and hence the need for greater coherence and coordination of economic and fiscal policies among euro area members.
Strategija bi se morala ob upoštevanju nedavno opravljenega pregleda konkurenčnosti osredotočiti zlasti na razlike v konkurenčnosti članic euroobmočja, ki so nastale v obdobju od uvedbe enotne valute.
In particular, it should target the competitiveness divergences that have arisen among euro area members since the introduction of the single currency, drawing on the recently established competitiveness review.
Dejansko vidim koristi v opredelitvi podrobnejših smernic politike, vključno s smernicami, ki bi se nanašale izključno na članice euroobmočja, kar omogoča člen 136 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije v Lizbonski pogodbi.
In practical terms, I see merits in defining more specific policy guidelines, including more specific guidelines addressed exclusively to euro area members, as made possible under the new Art. 136 TFEU in the Lisbon Treaty.
Zato z veseljem pričakujem sporočilo Komisije na to temo, ki naj bi bilo objavljeno spomladi 2010.
I therefore look forward to the Commission’s Communication on these matters which is expected in spring 2010.
ECB lahko najučinkoviteje prispeva k uspehu strategije EU 2020, če se verodostojno osredotoči na svojo monetarno politiko stabilnosti cen in s tem podpre kupno moč gospodinjstev euroobmočja.
The ECB can contribute to the success of the EU 2020 Strategy most effectively when focusing in its monetary policy on price stability in a credible manner and thereby supporting the purchasing power of euro area households.
Pri tem je treba poudariti, da monetarna politika ob boljšem delovanju enotnega evropskega trga lažje doseže stabilnost cen in podpre skupno rast.
In this context it should be pointed out that a better functioning single European market makes it easier for monetary policy to achieve price stability and to support growth.
Cilj ukrepov strukturnih reform naj bo torej izboljšanje konkurenčnosti, s čimer bi pospešili prestrukturiranje in investiranje ter omogočili nove poslovne priložnosti, zlasti v storitvenem sektorju.
Consequently, structural reform measures should be aimed at enhancing competition to speed up restructuring and investment and to give way to new business opportunities, in particular in the services sector.
To je nujno, če želimo omogočiti trajnostno rast produktivnosti, ki podpira potencialni obseg proizvodnje in realne dohodke, obenem pa preprečiti, da bi trenutna kriza dolgoročno vplivala na potencialno rast na euroobmočju.
This is crucial in order to engineer sustainable productivity growth supporting potential output and real income and in order to prevent the current crisis from affecting euro area potential growth in the long term.
Pomembni mejniki za povečanje gospodarske konkurenčnosti in učinkovitosti na ravni EU so dokončno izoblikovanje enotnega trga, ustrezen prenos skupnih predpisov v nacionalne zakonodaje in njihovo dosledno izvajanje.
At the EU level, an important milestone for enhancing economic competition and efficiency is the completion of Single Market, the proper transposition of the common rules into national laws, and their rigorous enforcement.
Poleg tega je potrebna večja prilagodljivost plač, ker bi določanje plač na euroobmočju tako prispevalo k prilagoditvi stroškov dela na enoto, kar je mogoče doseči s prilagajanjem plač položaju konkurenčnosti, pogojem na lokalnih trgih dela in razvoju produktivnosti, zlasti v obdobjih recesije.
Furthermore, there is a need for higher wage flexibility so that wage setting contributes to an adjustment of unit labour costs in the euro area by aligning wages to competitiveness positions, local labour market conditions and productivity developments, in particular in downturns.
Da bi preprečili nadaljnjo rast brezposelnosti, je treba plače stabilizirati kljub dogovorom o povišanju v državah, ki so jih zaznamovale pretekle izgube konkurenčnosti, in v sektorjih, ki jih je kriza še zlasti močno prizadela.
In order to avoid a further rise in unemployment, wages need to moderate beyond what has figured so far into negotiated wage developments for those countries marked by past competitiveness losses and for sectors being particularly hard hit by the crisis.
Za oživitev domačega povpraševanja v trenutni fazi nizke rasti je potrebno večje zaupanje gospodinjstev in podjetij, zlasti v prihodnje vire prihodkov.
A revitalisation of internal demand in the current phase of low growth requires an improvement in households’ and business confidence, in particular about future income streams.
S tega vidika so bili dosedanji kratkoročni krizni ukrepi – zlasti tisti, ki so podprli prilagoditev števila delovnih ur – v nekaterih primerih uspešni pri zmanjševanju zaposlitvenih izgub.
In this respect, short-term crisis support measures taken so far – specifically those supporting an adjustment in hours worked – have been successful in some cases in reducing employment losses.
Vendar pa začasne politike, ki povzročajo zakasnitev strukturnih sprememb v gospodarstvih, srednjeročno prinašajo nepotrebne proračunske stroške in ustvarjajo neučinkovitosti, ki ovirajo trajnostno zaposlovanje in resnično rast prihodkov.
However, in the medium term, temporary policies delaying structural changes in the economies carry unnecessary budgetary costs and create inefficiencies, which undermine sustainable employment and real income growth.
Zato potrebujemo jasne in verodostojne izhodne strategije za srednjeročno spodbujanje povpraševanja in zaposlovanja.
Therefore, clear and credible exit strategies are necessary to foster demand and employment in the medium term.
Davčne politike bi morale v podporo investiranju in s tem potencialnemu donosu izboljšati učinkovitost in kakovost javne porabe.
In this respect, fiscal policies should improve the efficiency and quality of public spending and with a view to bolster investment and thereby potential output.
Zadnje področje, ki bi ga morala Lizbonska strategija postaviti v ospredje, pa je energetika.
A final area where I think that the Lisbon strategy should press forward regards the energy sector.
Prekomerna odvisnost od nafte in ostalih neobnovljivih virov poleg vprašanj, povezanih s podnebnimi spremembami, predstavlja tudi potencialno ranljivo točko in morebiten vir makroekonomske nestabilnosti.
Besides issues related to climate change, over dependence on oil and other exhaustible resources constitutes a potential vulnerability and a possible source of macroeconomic instability.
V zvezi s tem ne smemo spregledati vloge nihanja v ceni nafte in njegovega vpliva na euroobmočje v nedavni krizi.
In this respect the role of the gyrations in oil prices and their impact on the euro area in the recent crisis should not be overlooked.
Zato bi morali imeti ukrepi, usmerjeni v zagotavljanje alternativnih zanesljivih virov energije in učinkovitega sektorja energetike, pomembno vlogo v naslednji strategiji za rast in zaposlovanje.
Therefore, pushing forward strategies aiming at having alternative reliable sources of energy and an efficient energy sector should figure high in the next strategy on growth and employment.
Kaj menite o hitrosti širitve euroobmočja tako s stališča euroobmočja kot tudi s stališča držav kandidatk?
What is your opinion regarding the pace of euro area enlargement both from the euro area's and the candidate countries point of view?
Kako ocenjujete dosedanje uvajanje eura v novih državah članicah?
How do you evaluate the introduction of the euro by New Member States up to now?
Ali menite, da je treba izboljšati oz. spremeniti pristopni proces in/ali obdobje za uvedbo eura?
Do you see a need for improvement or change in the accession process and/or the euro introduction period?
Od uvedbe eura v 11 državah članicah leta 1999 do sedaj je euro uvedlo še pet držav članic (štiri od teh so v Evropsko unijo vstopile leta 2004).
Following the introduction of the euro in 11 Member States in 1999, five additional Member States have adopted the euro in the meantime (including four countries that joined the EU in 2004).
Prednosti, ki jih prinaša euro, se tako vse bolj širijo tudi na nove države članice, kar dokazuje, da euroobmočje ni zaprt klub.
The benefits of the euro have thus increasingly spread also to new Member States, which shows that the euro area is not a "closed shop".
Za širitev euroobmočja ni vnaprej določenega urnika.
There is no predefined timetable for the enlargement of the euro area.
Od vseh držav članic, ki so v Evropsko unijo vstopile od leta 2004, se pričakuje, da bodo uvedle euro, ko bodo dosegle visoko stopnjo trajnostne konvergence, kot zahtevata pogodba in protokol.
All Member States that have joined the EU since 2004 are expected to adopt the euro once they have achieved a high degree of sustainable convergence as prescribed by the Treaty and Protocol.
Tega ne gre jemati zlahka, saj zahteva temeljito pripravo.
This requires thorough preparation and should not be taken lightly.
Izkušnje držav članic, ki so uvedle euro, potrjujejo, da je treba ob sprejetju novih članic v euroobmočje veliko pozornosti nameniti trajnosti konvergence.
The experience of Member States that have adopted the euro confirms that, when accepting new members into the euro area, we have to pay close attention to the sustainability of convergence.
Doseganje visoke stopnje trajne konvergence je bistvenega pomena najprej za državo samo, da lahko kar najbolje izkoristi prednosti, ki jih prinaša uvedba eura.
Achieving a high degree of sustainable convergence is essential, first and foremost for the country itself (so that it can reap the full benefits of euro adoption).
Poleg tega pa je to pomembno tudi za euroobmočje, saj je doseganje trajne konvergence v vseh državah ključnega pomena za njegovo usklajenost ter za učinkovito delovanje enotne monetarne politike.
In addition, it is also important for the euro area (as the achievement of the sustainable convergence of all participating countries is key for the coherence of the euro area and the efficient functioning of the single monetary policy).
Priprava verodostojne strategije za uvedbo eura, ki jo spremlja izvajanje ustreznih dobrih makroekonomskih politik in strukturnih reform, lahko spodbudi prizadevanje vseh zadevnih strani za ta cilj.
Setting out a credible strategy towards euro adoption (accompanied by the implementation of the necessary sound macroeconomic policies and structural reforms) could help to foster the commitment of all relevant parties towards this goal.
Kar zadeva proces uvedbe eura, je prava osnovna logika pogodbe: države morajo poskrbeti za to, da vodijo dobre makroekonomske politike.
As regards the euro adoption process, the fundamental logic of the Treaty remains correct: countries have to make sure that they pursue sound macroeconomic policies.
Institucionalni okvir, ki ureja proces uvedbe eura, kot določata Pogodba in protokol, je oblikovan tako, da zagotavlja izpolnjevanje predpogojev za uspešno sodelovanje na euroobmočju.
The institutional framework governing the process of euro adoption as enshrined in the Treaty and Protocol is designed to ensure that the preconditions for successful euro area participation are met.
Zato je dosledno spoštovanje tega okvira bistvenega pomena.
Strict adherence to this framework is, therefore, crucial.
Prav tako je zelo pomembno, da ocena konvergentnosti temelji na kakovostnih in zanesljivih statističnih podatkih.
It is also extremely important that the convergence assessment is based on high quality and trustworthy statistical data.
Kaj menite o vprašanju davka na finančne transakcije, o katerem se trenutno veliko razpravlja?
What do you think about the currently lively debated issue of financial transaction taxes?
Ali bi tak davek služil le zbiranju prihodkov iz finančnega sektorja ali je bolj verjetno, da bi omejil družbeno nezaželene transakcije?
Would such a tax rather merely raise revenues from the financial sector or is it more likely that it would limit socially undesirable transactions?
Kakšna bi bila vloga ECB pri izvajanju evropskega davka na finančne transakcije?
What would be the role of the ECB in the implementation of an EU financial transaction tax?
Kakšno bi lahko bilo, na podlagi obstoječih davkov na finančne transakcije (npr. kolkovina v Združenem kraljestvu), področje uporabe takih davkov, da bi bili učinkoviti?
Based on currently existing financial transaction taxes (e.g. stamp duty in the UK ), which could be the scope of such taxes in order to be effective?
Kakšna bi bili tveganja in pomanjkljivosti takih davkov?
Which would be the risks and drawbacks of such taxes?
Ali bi bil tak davek izvedljiv, če nekatere države ne bi spoštovale njegovih načel?
Would such a tax be feasible if some countries do not adhere to its principles?
Na kakšen način še, če uporabimo besede vrha G-20, „bi lahko finančni sektor pravično in pomembno prispeval“ k plačevanju za bremena, povezana s posredovanjem vlad pri reševanju bančnega sistema?
Which could be, to-put in the G-20 wording, other options “as to how the financial sector could make a fair and substantial contribution” toward paying for any burdens associated with government interventions to repair the banking system?
Naj najprej izrazim svojo podporo zamisli, da bi „lahko finančni sektor pravično in pomembno prispeval“ k plačevanju za bremena, povezana s posredovanjem vlad pri reševanju bančnega sistema.
Let me start by stating my support to the idea that «the financial sector could make a fair and substantial contribution” toward paying for any burdens associated with government interventions to repair the banking system.»
Kljub temu pa je treba predlog, da bi bilo v ta namen najbolje uvesti splošni davek na finančne transakcije, natančno proučiti.
Nevertheless the notion that this objective would be better served by introducing a general financial transaction tax requires careful assessment.
Najprej je treba razjasniti, da bi bil dejanski namen uvedbe takšnega davka zbiranje prihodkov iz finančnega sektorja in ne toliko zmanjšanje nihanj na finančnih trgih ali zmanjšanje spodbud za prevelika tveganja.
First, it needs to be clarified what the actual purpose of introducing such a tax would be to raise revenues from the financial sector and not so much to lower volatility in financial markets or to reduce incentives of excessive risk-taking.
Poleg težav pri doseganju ustreznih mednarodnih sporazumov, potrebnih za uvedbo tega davka na svetovni ravni, ter dejstva, da bi davek konec koncev pomenil povečanje stroškov finančnih storitev za končne uporabnike, je treba natančno proučiti tudi, kakšna bi bila njegova zmožnost ustvarjanja prihodka.
Besides the difficulty in reaching the necessary international agreement to impose such a tax at worldwide level, and the fact that the tax would be paid ultimately by an increased costs to clients of financial services, even the revenue generation capacity of a financial transactions tax needs to be carefully evaluated.
Zlasti pa ni mogoče avtomatsko uvesti davčne stopnje, npr. v višini 0,01 odstotka na skupno vrednost transakcij na finančnem trgu, da bi tako ocenili potencialne prihodke, ne da bi pri tem upoštevali možen vpliv davka na (i) skupen obseg transakcij, (ii) cene, ki veljajo za opravljene transakcije in (iii) drugih posrednih posledic.
In particular, one cannot simply mechanically apply a tax rate of, for instance, 0.01 percent to the total amount of financial market transactions in order to estimate potential revenues, without taking into account its potential impact on (i) the overall volume of transactions, (ii) the prices at which transactions are executed, and (iii) other second-round effects.
Glede na veliko negotovost v zvezi z učinkovitostjo davka na finančne transakcije in njegovo negotovo zmožnost ustvarjanja prihodka, je treba narediti natančno primerjavo davka na finančne transakcije z drugimi možnimi rešitvami.
Hence, given the large uncertainty with respect to the effectiveness of a financial transactions tax, and its uncertain revenue generation potential, any financial transactions tax should be carefully assessed against possible alternatives.
Da bi bile učinkovito orodje za spodbujanje stabilnosti finančnih trgov v prihodnosti, pa morajo te rešitve obsegati več kot le sheme za zbiranje sredstev.
Such alternatives, however, in order to provide an efficient tool for promoting financial market stability in the future, would have to go beyond mere fund-raising schemes.
Skupina G20 in Mednarodni denarni sklad pripravljata številne predloge, ki – poleg davka na finančne transakcije – vključujejo tudi obdavčevanje dodatkov in plačil za delo v finančnem sektorju (ukrep proti prevelikemu tveganju udeležencev na trgu) ter obdavčevanje bilančnih postavk, namen katerega je preprečevanje neskladnosti, vse to pa bi skupaj z zavarovalnimi shemami služilo preprečevanju podružbljenja prihodnjih izgub v finančnem sektorju.
In fact, the G20 and the IMF are working on a number of proposals which – apart from a financial transactions tax – also include taxation of bonuses and pay in the financial sector (targeting market participants‘ willingness to take excessive risk) as well as taxation of balance sheet items in order to prevent mismatches, all of which could be combined with insurance schemes to avoid the socialisation of future losses in the financial sector.
V nasprotju z zgoraj omenjenim davkom, ki bi se obračunaval zgolj na finančne transakcije, se ostale možnosti osredotočajo na posamezne institucije, z namenom krepitve odpornosti ter zmožnosti nadomestitve izgub finančnega sistema v celoti.
Contrary to the above mentioned tax - which is levied on financial transactions only - these options focus on individual institutions with the purpose of strengthening the resilience and the loss-absorbing capacity of the financial system as a whole.
V okviru tega se trenutno proučuje možnost uvedbe dodatnih zahtev skrbnega in varnega poslovanja za sistemske finančne institucije, ki bi zato, ker uživajo status „prevelike, da bi lahko propadle“, najverjetneje dobile vladno pomoč.
In this context, for instance, it is currently analysed the possibility to introduce additional prudential requirements on systemic financial institutions that due to their “too big to fail” status would most likely receive government assistance.
Namen dodatnih zahtev glede skrbnega in varnega poslovanja – v obliki kapitalskih pribitkov in/ali rezervnega kapitala – je povečati zmožnost nadomestitve izgub in odpornost bančnih bilanc na šoke ter tako posredno zmanjšati pričakovane stroške za davkoplačevalce pri prihodnjih finančnih injekcijah bankam.
These additional prudential requirements - in the form of capital surcharges and/or contingent capital - aim to increase the loss absorption capacity and the resilience to shocks of banks balance sheets and therefore to indirectly reduce the expected cost for tax-payers in future bail-outs.
Namen ostalih ukrepov v obravnavi je zbrati denarne prispevke finančnih institucij in tako neposredno zmanjšati (pretekle ali prihodnje) stroške zaradi javnih financ, namenjenih posredovanju vlade, ali prispevati k njihovi poravnavi.
Other measures under consideration aim to raise a monetary contribution from financial institutions thereby directly reducing or contributing to the (past or future) costs borne by public finances for government interventions.
Dober primer je uvedba prispevka na obveznosti finančnih institucij, podobnega prispevku za finančno odgovornost v ZDA.
A prominent example is the introduction of a fee on financial institutions liabilities, as in the US financial responsibility fee.
Splošni cilj prispevka za finančno odgovornost, ki ga namerava uvesti administracija Združenih držav, je doseči, da bo bančni sektor prispeval h kritju stroškov finančne krize, in ta ukrep bi lahko posnemali širše.
With its overarching objective of making the banking sector contribute to cover the costs of a financial crisis, the intention by the US administration to introduce a “responsibility fee” could be broadly shared.
V tem okviru želim spomniti na stališče, ki ga je pred kratkim izrazil Eurosistem, da morata krizno upravljanje in okvirno reševanje stremeti k čim večjemu zmanjšanju bremena, ki izhaja iz krize finančnih institucij, za davkoplačevalce.
In this framework, I would like to recall the position - recently expressed by the Eurosystem - that the crisis management and resolution framework should aim at reducing to the minimum the possible burden for taxpayers arising from any crisis of financial institutions.
V zvezi s tem pozdravljam namen Komisije, da prouči nadaljnje možnosti za izvedbo mehanizmov, ki bi zagotavljali, da bi bila sredstva iz zasebnega sektorja na voljo v času krize (glej tudi vprašanje 38).
In this respect, I welcome the Commission’s intention to further explore the feasibility of mechanisms that could ensure that private sector funds would be available at the time of a crisis (see also Question 38).
Kakšen je vaš pogled na dolgoročnejšo prihodnost evropske monetarne unije in kakšni izzivi so pred nami?
What are your views on the future of the European monetary union in the longer term and what are the main challenges ahead?
Pomembno je, da kot Evropejci še naprej gradimo na vélikem uspehu oblikovanja enotne valute na našem kontinentu.
It is crucial that as Europeans, we continue to build on the enormous success of establishing a single currency on our continent.
Evropska unija in monetarna unija sta dosežka brez primere in ne smemo pozabiti na to, koliko smo dosegli.
The feat of European Union and of Monetary Union is unprecedented, and we should not forget how much we have achieved.
Menim, da evropsko monetarno unijo dolgoročno čaka svetla prihodnost.
I believe that the future of European monetary union in the longer-term is a bright one.
Lizbonska strategija, ki je pred kratkim stopila v veljavo, je procesu evropske integracije dala nov zagon, to pa bi moralo izboljšati okolje, v katerem deluje monetarna unija.
The recent coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty has given a new impetus to the process of European integration and this should improve the environment in which monetary union operates.