natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice in Komisija med strateškim spremljanjem in pri vmesnem pregledu nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirov ter nacionalnih in regionalnih operativnih programov, kakor so opredeljeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 1083/2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu, upoštevajo upravičenost mobilnosti v mestih in spodbujanje čistih in energetsko učinkovitih vozil za cestni prevoz.
Member States and the Commission shall take into account, during the strategic follow-up and mid-term review of the national strategic reference frameworks and national and regional operational programmes, as defined by Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, the eligibility of urban mobility and the promotion of clean and energy efficient road transport vehicles.
Države članice in Komisija še naprej podpirajo pobude za mestni promet, kot sta program CIVITAS in program Pametna energija za Evropo.
Member States and the Commission shall continue to support urban transport initiatives such as the CIVITAS programme and the Intelligent Energy-Europe programme.
Vmesni pregled nacionalnih operativnih programov bi lahko pospešil spodbujanje čistih vozil in energetsko učinkovitih vozil z boljšo uporabo različnih finančnih instrumentov, ki so na voljo na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti.
The mid-term review of the national operational programmes could facilitate the promotion of clean and energy-efficient vehicles through better use of the different financial instruments available at national level as well as at Community level
Izmenjava in širjenje informacij
Exchanges and dissemination of information
Države članice morajo z določbami te direktive in z nacionalno zakonodajo za prenos direktive seznanjati nacionalne, regionalne ali lokalne javne in zasebne naročnike, ki z licenco, dovoljenjem ali pooblastilom javnih organov nudijo javne potniške prevozne storitve, ter morajo zagotavljati pomoč in potrebne informacije v zvezi s finančnimi shemami Skupnosti, ki se uporabljajo za naročila iz te direktive.
Member States shall inform national, regional or local contracting authorities and contracting entities which provide public passenger transport services under licence, permit or authorisation granted by public authorities of the provisions of this Directive, along with the national laws transposing it, and shall likewise provide every assistance, and all necessary information, concerning the Community funding schemes applicable to the procurement procedures covered by this Directive.
Pri oblikovanju politike na področju čistih in energetsko učinkovitih storitev v javnem prevozu mora Komisija spodbujati širjenje najboljše prakse ter oblikovati evropsko spletno stran, da bi pri nakupu vozil s strani subjektov iz te direktive začeli s postopno uporabo enotnih meril na ravni Skupnosti.
The Commission shall encourage the dissemination of best practice to enable policies to be drawn up in the area of clean and energy efficient public transport services, by setting up a n EU Internet site, in order to move gradually towards the application of standardised Community-wide criteria to the procurement of vehicles by the entities covered by this Directive.
Komisija na spletni strani objavi vse ustrezne informacije glede finančnih instrumentov, ki so v vsaki državi članici na voljo za mobilnost v mestih in za spodbujanje čistih in učinkovitih vozil za cestni prevoz.
The Commission shall publish on the Internet site all relevant information related to the financial instruments available in the individual Member States for urban mobility and for the promotion of clean and energy efficient road transport vehicles.
Javnim naročnikom je treba zagotoviti ustrezne informacije, da bodo bolje pripravili prevzeme, glede na to, da se bodo določbam direktiv 2004/17 in 2004/18 pridružila nova „zelena“ merila za dodelitev.
It is important to provide the relevant information to contracting authorities in order to better prepare for the acquisitions due to the fact that the 'green' award criteria will be new, in addition to the provisions of the Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18EC.
Komisija v poročilu oceni učinek te direktive in potrebo po nadaljnjem ukrepanju ter po potrebi poda predloge.
The report shall assess the effects of this Directive and the need for further action, and include proposals as appropriate.
Najkasneje v treh letih po datumu, navedenem v členu 8, in zatem vsaki dve leti Komisija pripravi poročilo o izvajanju te direktive, vključno z informacijami iz odstavka 1, ter o ukrepih, ki so jih posamezne države članice sprejele za spodbujanje naročanja čistih in energetsko učinkovitih vozil za cestni prevoz.
N o later than three years af t er the date referred to in Article 8 , and every two years thereafter, the Commission shall prepare a report on the application of this Directive, including the information referred to in paragraph 1, and on the actions taken by individual Member States to promote the procurement of clean and energy efficient road transport vehicles.
Komisija v poročilu oceni učinek te direktive , vključno s količinskimi kazalniki za ocenjevanje okoljskih koristi, poročanjem držav članic in potrebo po nadaljnjem ukrepanju , ter po potrebi poda predloge.
The report shall assess the effects of this Directive including quantitative indicators to evaluate the environmental benefits, the reporting by Member States and the need for further action, and include proposals as appropriate.
Komisija za vsako od štirih kategorij vozil primerja nominalno in relativno število kupljenih vozil glede na skupni trg za ta vozila glede na najboljšo tržno alternativo v smislu stroškov skupne življenjske dobe vozila, vključno z zunanjimi stroški, ter oceni, kako so merila iz člena 3 vplivala na trg.
The Commission shall compare the nominal and relative figures of vehicles purchased corresponding to the best market alternative in terms of overall lifetime costs, including external costs, within each of the four categories of vehicles to the overall market for these vehicles and estimate how the criteria set out in A rticle 3 ha ve affected the market.
Priloga – razpredelnica 1
Annex – Table 1
Razpredelnica 1: Vsebnost energije v motornih gorivih
Table 1: Energy content of motor fuels
Gorivo Vsebnost energije
Fuel Energy Content
Dizelsko gorivo 36 MJ/liter
Diesel 36 MJ/litre
Bencin 32 MJ/liter
Petrol 32 MJ/litre
Zemeljski plin 38 MJ/Nm 3
Natural gas 38 MJ/Nm 3
Zemeljski plin 33 MJ/Nm 3
Natural gas 33 MJ/Nm 3
Utekočinjeni naftni plin 24 MJ/liter
LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) 24 MJ/litre
Biodizel 33 MJ/liter
Biodiesel 33 MJ/litre
Emulzijsko gorivo 32 MJ/liter
Emulsion fuel 32 MJ/litre
Vodik 11 MJ/Nm 3
Hydrogen 11 MJ/Nm 3
Pri postopkih homologacije se v porabi, določeni za osebna vozila, upošteva dejstvo, da ima lahko zemeljski plin nizko vsebnost energije.
Under type approval procedures, ruled consumption for passenger cars takes into account the fact that natural gas can be of low energy content.
Da bi se zagotovila usklajenost s porabami, določenimi za obstoječa vozila, je treba namesto vrednosti 38 MJ uporabljati vrednost 33 MJ, ki se nanaša na mešan proizvod, podoben metanu.
In order to ensure consistency with the ruled consumptions for existing vehicles, a value of 33 MJ, which refers to a mixed methane-type product, should be used, rather than that of 38 MJ.
Če bo obveljala vrednost, ki jo predlaga Komisija, se bodo pojavile težave zaradi neskladnosti med parametri iz tega predloga in uradno veljavnimi in referenčnimi parametri za homologacijo.
Were the value suggested by the Commission to stand, problems would arise concerning a lack of consistency between the parameters established in the present proposal and the type approval parameters currently recognised as being official and a reference.
Priloga – razpredelnica 2 – stolpec 1 – vrsta 2
Annex – Table 2 - column 1 - row 2
3 cente/ kg ali tržna cena sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami (višja od obeh vrednosti)
3 €cents /kg or the EU Emissions Trading System ( ETS ) market price, whichever is higher
30 EUR na tono najbrž bolj točno ponazarja ceno ogljika v življenjski dobi vozila, kupljenega po letu 2010.
30€ / ton is more likely to represent an accurate carbon price over lifetime of vehicles purchased after 2010.
Sedanji predlog vključuje prejšnja priporočila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
The present proposal incorporates previous recommendations made by the Committee on the Environment
Sedanji predlog nadomešča prejšnjega (KOM (2005), 634 končno) in na ključnih področjih – kot rezultat obravnave odbora za okolje – vključuje več praktičnih priporočil poročevalca ter drugih poslancev.
The current proposal replaces a previous proposal (COM (2005), 634 final) and, in key areas – as a result of consideration by the Committee on the Environment – incorporates a number of practical recommendations made by your rapporteur and other Members of Parliament.
Med naslednjimi je nekaj najpomembnejših točk:
Some of the most important features are that:
· direktiva zajema vsa vozila,
· all vehicles are covered by the Directive,
· vključuje tudi emisije CO2,
· CO2 emissions are included,
· uporablja se tehnološko nevtralen in prožen pristop (v primerjavi s statističnim standardom),
· the model is technology-neutral and flexible (rather than a static standard),
· javna naročila se ohranjajo kot instrument za promocijo okolju prijaznih vozil,
· public procurement is maintained as an instrument for promoting environmentally friendly vehicles,
· zaradi spoštovanja načela subsidiarnosti je mogoče upoštevati posebne pomisleke na lokalni ravni.
· specific local considerations may be taken into account so that the subsidiarity principle is respected.
Izračun stroškov življenjske dobe vozila
Lifetime costs calculated
V direktivi se zahteva, da vsi organi, ki izvajajo postopke javnih naročil (ali akterji, ki delujejo v imenu javnega sektorja ali z njegovim pooblastilom), ne izračunajo le nakupne cene, ampak tudi stroške, ki v življenjski dobi vozila nastanejo za gorivo, emisije CO2 in onesnaževanje zraka, ter da ta izračun uporabijo kot merilo pri odločitvi o nakupu.
The Directive requires all public procurers – or actors acting on behalf of or under licence from the public sector – to calculate not only the purchase price but also the lifetime costs for fuel, CO2 emissions and air pollution, and to use those as a criterion for purchase.
Javna naročila kot katalizator trga
Public procurement as market catalyst
Odbor zagovarja idejo o uporabi javnih naročil kot tržnega katalizatorja za okolju prijazna vozila, zato spreminja člen 1 in poudarja, da je ta vidik pomemben cilj te direktive.
The Committee supports the idea of using public procurement as a market catalyst for environmentally friendly vehicles and has, therefore, adapted Article 1, stressing this aspect as a significant objective of the directive.
Javna naročila predstavljajo na evropski ravni zelo pomemben tržni delež, zato bo dejstvo, da javni organi prevzemajo vodilno vlogo pri tem, da izračunavajo in uporabljajo "stroške življenjske dobe" kot osnovo pri naročanju, zagotovilo, da se avtomobilska industrija spodbuja k razvoju in naložbam na področju okolju prijaznih vozil z manjšimi emisijami CO2 in onesnaževal.
At European level, public procurement represents a very significant share of the market and having public authorities take a leading role by calculating and using ‘lifetime costs’ as a basis for procurement will ensure that the automobile industry is prompted to develop and invest in environmentally friendly vehicles with lower CO2 and pollutant emissions.
Preglednost in javna razprava
Transparency and public debate
Za to, da se okoljevarstveni vidiki upoštevajo pri sprejetju lokalnih odločitev o naročanju vozil, je zelo pomembno, da imajo nevladne organizacije, državljani in politiki na lokalni ravni dostop do informacij o takšnem naročanju.
If local decisions concerning the procurement of vehicles are to be swayed by environmental considerations, it is crucial that NGOs, citizens and local politicians have access to information about such procurement.
Direktiva je zato spremenjena na več področjih, da se povečata preglednost in javni dostop do informacij ter izboljša možnost za opravljanje primerjav.
Therefore, the Directive is amended in a number of areas with a view to strengthening transparency and public access to information, and improving the scope for comparison.
Predlogi sprememb vključujejo naslednje vidike:
These amendments include:
· lokalni organi dajo na voljo vse informacije v zvezi s stroški življenjske dobe vozila, ki zadevajo odločitev o naročanju,
· local authorities making available all information concerning lifetime costs in connection with procurement decisions,
· Komisija pripravi primerjalno tabelo, ki omogoča primerjanje lokalnih organov v zvezi s tem, kako uspešni so pri nakupu okolju prijaznih vozil,
· the Commission establishing a scoreboard making it possible to compare how good local authorities are at buying environmentally friendly vehicles,
· uvedba oznake za "okolju prijazno naročanje", ki jo lahko uporabljajo lokalni in regionalni organi z vodilno vlogo pri naročanju okolju prijaznih vozil.
· the introduction of an ‘environmentally friendly procurement label’ which can be used by local and regional authorities pioneering the procurement of environmentally friendly vehicles.
Pregled in ocena učinka direktive
Rev iew and assessment of the impact of the D irective
Pomembno je oceniti učinek, ki ga želi direktiva doseči v sedanji obliki.
It is important to assess to what extent the Directive in its present form has the desired effect.
Odbor je zato pripravil več predlogov sprememb za zagotavljanje posebnega spremljanja in ocenjevanja učinka direktive na trg in okolje.
The Committee, therefore, proposed a number of amendments to ensure specific follow-up and evaluation of the impact on the market and the environment.
Zato se od Komisije zahteva, da:
The Commission is, therefore, required:
· vsako drugo leto poroča o izvajanju in učinku direktive na okolje in na trg v različnih kategorijah vozil.
· to report every other year on the implementation and impact of the Directive on the market in the various categories of vehicle and on the environment.
Odbor meni, da bi bilo mogoče do leta 2010 uvesti in začeti uporabljati predpisano metodo izračuna stroškov za življenjsko dobo vozila, zato predlaga, da se določi čim zgodnejši datum in s tem omogoči čim prejšnje delovanje okoljskih in tržnih učinkov.
It should be possible to introduce and use the prescribed method for calculating lifetime costs as early as 2010 and the Committee, therefore, proposes that the date should be brought forward so that the environmental and market effects can come into force as quickly as possible.
Pripravljavec mnenja načeloma pozdravlja predlog Komisije za direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spodbujanju čistih in energetsko učinkovitih vozil za cestni prevoz, saj je to priložnost za spodbujanje čistih in energijsko učinkovitih proizvodov.
Your draftsperson in principle welcomes the Commission proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of clean and energy efficient road transport vehicles as this can be regarded as an opportunity to promote clean and energy efficient products.
Priznava, da ta predlog kaže na izboljšanje v primerjavi z drugimi predlogi, zlasti pa pozdravlja pristop, ki je neodvisen od tehnologije.
He recognises that this proposal presents an improvement over previous proposals and he particularly welcomes the technology neutral approach.
Pripravljavec mnenja pa se ne strinja s predlogom Komisije, da bi ekološka in energetsko učinkovita merila za javna naročila postala obvezna.
The draftsperson disagrees however with the Commission proposal to make the green and energy efficient public procurement criteria mandatory.
Meni, da predlagano uvajanje obveznih meril pri javnih naročilih, četudi je namen v tem primeru pohvalen, ni nujno skladno s temeljnimi načeli zakonodaje Skupnosti o javnih naročilih in lahko pomeni nezaželen precedens.
He considers that the proposed introduction of mandatory criteria in public procurement, even though the intention in this case is laudable, does not necessarily sit well with fundamental principles of Community public procurement law, and may risk setting an unwelcome precedent.
Zato predlaga, da se ustreznim organom držav članic prepusti izbira, kdaj bodo uporabili ta merila, kar pa ne pomeni, da je treba izključiti jasno sporočilo tem organom in telesom, naj uvedejo omenjena okoljska merila v ustrezna javna naročila.
He therefore proposes leaving it up to the contracting authorities of Member States to choose when to apply such criteria, which does not preclude sending a strong message to contracting authorities and entities encouraging them to introduce these environmental criteria for the type of procurement at stake.
Za večjo jasnost pripravljavec mnenja tudi poziva, naj se v tem predlogu jasno navajajo ustrezni denarni pragovi za javna naročila iz Direktiv 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES, saj Komisija ne omenja neposredno minimalnega praga, nad katerim naj veljajo ta nova pravila.
For clarity, the draftsperson also calls for a clear reference to be made in this proposal to the applicable monetary thresholds of public procurement Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC, as the Commission proposal makes no direct reference to applicable minimum thresholds above which these new rules apply.
Pripravljavec mnenja predlaga, naj se v skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o boljši pripravi zakonodaje doda uvodna izjava, ki bi spodbujala države članice, naj pripravijo svoje preglednice, iz katerih bo razviden odnos med to direktivo in ukrepi za njen prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo, ter naj jih objavijo.
In accordance with the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, the draftsperson proposes a recital encouraging Member States to draw up their own tables illustrating the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and make them public.
Ker predlog zadeva predvsem področje gospodarskih vozil (npr. posebne tovornjake in avtobuse za operativno podporo in vzdrževanje infrastrukture, čistilne stroje), pripravljavec mnenja predlaga, naj se za posamezna vozila naredijo izjeme, saj imajo posebno obliko in opremo ter se zato njihova poraba energije razlikuje od porabe pri drugih vozilih.
As the proposal particularly affects the commercial vehicles sector (e.g. specialised trucks and busses for operational support and infrastructure maintenance, cleaning machines), the draftsperson proposes an exemption of certain vehicles from the scope as these have individual designs and equipment and their energy consumption therefore varies from that of other vehicles.
Pripravljavec mnenja poudarja, da je presoja vpliva tega predloga nepopolna, na primer glede pričakovanih stroškov in znanstvenih dokazov, ki podpirajo povezavo med internalizacijo zunanjih stroškov s konkretnimi vsotami, ter ne upošteva obstoječih standardov, kot so stadardi Euro.
Your draftsperson points out that the impact assessment for this proposal is incomplete with regard to e.g. the expected costs, the scientific evidence that backs up the link made between the internalisation of external costs into concrete numbers and furthermore does not take into consideration existing standards such as the EURO standards.
Zato poziva Komisijo, naj presodi učinke in metodologijo te direktive na osnovi dvoletnega obdobja in naj v zvezi s tem npr. upošteva učinek na okolje v zvezi z gorivi iz obnovljivih virov in novimi koraki v razvoju glede na standarde Euro (prihodnja zakonodaja Euro VI).
He therefore calls upon the Commission to assess the effects and the methodology of this Directive on a 2-year basis and, in this context, to take into consideration e.g. climate impact from renewable fuels and new developments with regard to the EURO standards (the forthcoming EURO VI legislation).
Zaradi zelo tesnega časovnega razporeda za sprejetje mnenja, ki ga je določil pristojni odbor, si pripravljavec mnenja v nadaljnjevanju postopka pridržuje pravico vlaganja nadaljnjih sprememb pri teh točkah.
Given the very tight timetable for adoption of the opinion, dictated by the lead Committee's timetable, your draftsperson also reserves the right to propose further amendments on these points at a later stage in the procedure.
Če bi se pojavilo dovolj veliko povpraševanje po teh vozilih, bi bili stroški zaradi ekonomije obsega nižji , gospodarstvo pa bi temeljilo na obnovljivih virih energije .
Creating sufficient demand for such vehicles should ensure that economies of scale lead to cost reductions and an economy based on renewable energies .
(16) Okoljska merila, določena v tej direktivi, ne preprečujejo izbire predelanih vozil, ki se nadgradijo, da bi bila ekološko sprejemljivejša.
(16) The environmental criteria set out in this Directive do not prevent the choice of retro-fitted vehicles upgraded for higher environmental performance.
Obvezna okoljska merila, predvidena v tej direktivi, niso skladna z direktivama o javnih naročilih 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES.
The mandatory environmental criteria envisaged do not fit in well with the public procurement Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC.
Naročniki morajo imeti proste roke pri izbiri meril, ki jih navedejo v dokumentaciji za naročila, ter obdržati možnost izbire na podlagi ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe ali najnižje cene in prostovoljno uporabiti predlagana okoljska merila.
Contracting authorities should be free to choose which criteria they specify in tender documentation and continue to be able to award on the basis of the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) or the lowest price, applying the proposed environmental criteria on a voluntary basis.
(19a) Države članice bi morale v skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 1 zase in v interesu Skupnosti pripraviti svoje lastne tabele, ki čim bolje ponazarjajo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za njen prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo, ter jih objaviti.
(19a) In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making 1 , Member States should draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Community, their own tables illustrating, as far as possible, the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and make them public.
(19b) Prednost je treba dati vozilom, ki uporabljajo alternativna goriva in vodijo k čistemu cestnemu prevozu ter občutnemu izboljšanju kakovosti zraka.
(19b) Priority should be given to vehicles with alternative fuels that lead to clean road transport and a significant improvement in air quality.
(19c) Države članice morajo v prihodnja prizadevanja za izvajanje, spremljanje in oceno določb te direktive vključiti občine in regije.
(19c) The Member States should involve municipalities and regions in further efforts to implement, follow up and evaluate the provisions of this Directive.
Za boljše izvajanje je potrebna udeležba vseh ravni oblasti.
Participation at all level of government is needed for better implementation.
(19d) Države članice in Komisija bi morale svoja prizadevanja usmeriti v podporo vodiku kot gorivu prihodnosti.
(19d) The Member States and the Commission should focus on the promotion of hydrogen as the fuel of the future.
Vodikov pogon je čist način pogona vozil in njegova uporaba bi morala prispevati k ustvarjanju gospodarstva brez onesnaževanja, saj vozila na vodikov pogon ne proizvajajo ne onesnaževal na osnovi ogljika ne emisij toplogrednih plinov iz izpušnih cevi.
Hydrogen is a clean way of powering vehicles, and its use should contribute to the creation of a pollution-free economy, as vehicles propelled by hydrogen produce neither carbon-based pollutants nor emissions of green-house gases from the exhaust pipe,