natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V prvem oddelku pregled spremlja delovanje trgov v vsem gospodarstvu s petimi ključnimi kazalniki (pritožbe, cene, zadovoljstvo, preklapljanje in varnost).
In the first section, the Scoreboard monitors the performance of markets across the economy against a range of five key indicators (complaints, prices, satisfaction, switching and safety).
Na ta način bi se moralo pokazati, v katerih sektorjih je za potrošnike največje tveganje nepravilnega delovanja.
This should identify which sectors have the greatest risk of malfunctioning for consumers.
V drugem oddelku so predstavljeni kazalniki, ki kažejo napredovanje povezovanja maloprodajnih trgov.
In section two, indicators are presented to track progress in retail market integration.
Tretji oddelek pregleda prikazuje podatke za primerjalno analizo nacionalnega potrošniškega okolja.
The third section of the Scoreboard presents data for benchmarking the national consumer environment.
Komisija je 28. januarja 2009 sprejela drugo izdajo pregleda stanja potrošniških trgov
On 28 January 2009 the Commission adopted the second edition of the Consumer Markets Scoreboard
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 28. januarja 2009 z naslovom Spremljanje rezultatov za potrošnike na enotnem trgu: druga izdaja pregleda stanja potrošniških trgov ( KOM(2009)0025 ).
Commission Communication of 28 January 2009 entitled “Monitoring consumer outcomes in the single market: Second edition of the Consumer Markets Scoreboard” ( COM(2009)0025 ).
Sporočilo spremlja delovni dokument osebja Komisije Drugi pregled stanja potrošniških trgov ( SEK(2009)0076 ). , ki potrjuje vrednost na dokazih temelječega pristopa za ugotavljanje, kateri trgi ne delujejo dobro za potrošnike.
The Communication is accompanied by the Commission Staff Working Document “Second Consumer Markets Scoreboard” ( SEC(2009)0076 ). , which confirms the value of the evidence-based approach for indicating which markets may not function well for consumers.
V njem je analizirala potrošniške trge po istih glavnih kazalnikih kot leto poprej, glavne ugotovitve pa so bile:
Analysing consumer markets against the same key indicators as in the previous year, the main findings of the Scoreboard are:
- potrošniki so manj zadovoljni in imajo več težav pri storitvah kot pri izdelkih, zlasti na področju energije, transporta in bančništva.
- Consumers are less satisfied and experience more problems with services than goods , notably in relation to energy, transport and banking services.
Maloprodajni sektor elektrike bo ciljni sektor za nadaljnjo analizo;
Retail electricity will be a target sector for further analysis;
- potrošniki poročajo o manj podražitvah v sektorjih, kjer so višje cene za preklop med ponudniki, med drugim pri zavarovanju avtomobilov in internetu.
- Consumers report fewer price increases in sectors with higher switching rates , inter alia car insurance and internet.
Zato bi moralo biti prednostna naloga omogočiti preklapljanje, zlasti v bančništvu in energetiki;
Hence, facilitating switching should be a priority, in particular for banking services and energy;
- čezmejna e-trgovina se zaradi čezmejnih preprek ne razvija tako hitro kot domača e-trgovina;
- Cross-border e-commerce is not developing as quickly as domestic e-commerce due to cross-border barriers;
- za dobro delovanje trgov sta pomembna učinkovito izvrševanje zakonodaje in pravna sredstva, vendar so med državami članicami velike razlike.
- Effective enforcement and redress are essential for markets to function well, but there are major differences between Member States.
Potrošniki izražajo nezadovoljstvo tudi glede reševanja težav.
Consumers also express dissatisfaction related to problem solving.
Poročevalka pozdravlja drugo izdajo pregleda potrošniških trgov in prizadevanja Komisije, da bi priskrbela več kakovostnih podatkov, potrebnih za nadaljnji razvoj trdne zbirke potrošniških podatkov in ugotovitev, na katerih trgih je največja nevarnost pomanjkljivega delovanja v smislu ekonomskih in socialnih učinkov za potrošnike.
Your Rapporteur welcomes the second edition of the Consumer Markets Scoreboard and the Commission’s efforts to provide more quality data which are necessary to further develop a solid consumer evidence base and identify which markets have the greatest risk of malfunctioning in terms of economic and social outcomes for consumers.
Čeprav doslej zbrane ugotovitve še vedno ne zadostujejo za oblikovanje dokončnih sklepov in pet kazalnikov ne zajame vseh vidikov potrošniškega okolja, poročevalka meni, da omogočajo trdno podlago za določitev prednostnih nalog in za sklepe, kje je potrebna nadaljnja analiza.
Although the current evidence is still not sufficient to draw definite conclusions, and the five indicators do not capture all aspects of the consumer environment, your Rapporteur considers that they provide a sufficient basis to set priorities and draw conclusions as to where further analysis is needed.
Za prihodnje preglede bo treba te kazalnike nadalje razviti in izboljšati zbiranje podatkov, pri tem pa upoštevati razlike med nacionalnimi sistemi.
In future Scoreboards, the indicators need to be further developed and the data collection improved, taking account of differences between national systems.
Pregled bi moral zajemati glavne kategorije potrošniških izdatkov, da bi ugotovili, kateri trgi so najbolj problematični, in pripraviti podlago za nadaljnjo in podrobnejšo analizo posameznih sektorjev, zlasti tam, kjer so podatki o težavah, ki so skupne različnim trgom.
The Scoreboard should cover all the main categories of consumer expenditure in order to identify the most problematic markets and set the ground for further more detailed sector specific analysis, in particular where it reveals evidence of problems common to different markets.
Ker je pregled zamišljen kot orodje za boljše oblikovanje politike in boljšo zakonodajo, poročevalka poudarja, da ga ne bi smeli uporabljati samo za boljšo potrošniško politiko, pač pa bi moral biti vir za vse politike, ki zadevajo potrošnike, s tem bi namreč zagotavljal boljšo vključitev potrošniških interesov v vse politike EU.
Provided that the Scoreboard is meant to serve as a tool to ensure better policymaking and regulation, your Rapporteur underlines that it should not only be used to deliver a better consumer policy, but must also feed through all policies that affect consumers, ensuring thereby a better integration of consumer interests into all EU policies.
Evropska zakonodaja o varstvu potrošnikov nima pravega smisla, če jih na nacionalni ravni pravilno ne prenesemo, izvajamo in izvršujemo.
EU consumer law serves little purpose if it is not properly transposed, implemented and enforced at national level.
Odgovornost javnih organov je zagotoviti, da pravila o varstvu potrošnikov učinkovito delujejo.
Public authorities have the responsibility to ensure that consumer protection rules work effectively on the ground.
To zahteva partnerstvo med državami članicami in Komisijo, pa tudi dejavne organizacije potrošnikov, ki javne organe opozarjajo na težave, s katerimi se potrošniki srečujejo v vsakdanjem življenju.
This requires a joint partnership between Member States and the Commission, but also active consumer organisations alerting public authorities to the problems consumers experience in their daily lives.
Potrošniški trgi se hitro razvijajo, izvršilni organi pa se morajo biti zmožni spoprijeti z novimi izzivi, pred katere gospodarske in tehnološke spremembe postavljajo njihovo zmožnost učinkovitega delovanja v čezmejnem okolju, kakršen je notranji trg.
Consumer markets evolve rapidly and enforcement authorities must be able to face the new challenges that economic and technological changes bring to their ability to be effective in a cross-border environment such as the internal market.
Vedno večja čezmejna razsežnost potrošniških trgov prinaša nove izzive tem organom, katerih delo ovirajo meje pristojnosti in drobljenje zakonodajnega okvira.
The increasing cross-border dimension of consumer markets impedes the effectiveness of enforcers who are constrained by jurisdictional boundaries and the fragmentation of the regulatory framework.
Komisija je svoje sporočilu z dne 2. julija 2009 o izvrševanju pravnega reda o varstvu potrošnikov
In its Communication of 2 July 2009 on the enforcement of the consumer acquis ,
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 2. julija 2009 o izvrševanju pravnega reda o varstvu potrošnikov ( KOM(2009)0330 ). opredelila pet področij za prednostno ukrepanje:
Commission Communication of 2 July 2009 on the enforcement of the consumer acquis ( COM(2009)0330 ) the Commission has identified five priority action areas:
- razvoj močnejših in učinkovitejših mehanizmov čezmejnega sodelovanja za izvrševanje pravnega reda;
- Develop stronger and more effective cross-border enforcement cooperation mechanisms;
- okrepitev preglednosti ter vidnosti tržnega nadzora in izvršilnih ukrepov;
- Strengthen the transparency and visibility of market surveillance and enforcement activities;
- boljša izmenjava znanja in razvoj skupnega razumevanja pravil;
- Improve knowledge-sharing and develop a common understanding of the rules;
- boljši tržni nadzor – razvoj močnejšega pristopa, ki bo temeljil na dokazih;
- Better market monitoring – develop a stronger evidence based approach;
- izboljšanje mednarodnega sodelovanja.
- Step up international cooperation.
Poročevalka pozdravlja pet prednostnih ukrepov, ki jih je navedla Komisija, čeprav bi se ji zdela še boljša bolj poglobljena analiza, kako delujejo obstoječi mehanizmi, pa tudi razčlemba njihovih rezultatov glede na podatke, pridobljene v pregledu potrošniških trgov.
Your Rapporteur welcomes these five priority actions identified by the Commission, although she would have favoured a more in-depth critical analysis of the way these existing mechanisms operate and their outcome in the light of the data provided by the Consumer Markets Scoreboard.
Ključ do vse večjega zaupanja potrošnikov je učinkovito izvajanje in izvrševanje evropskih predpisov o varstvu potrošnikov.
The effective implementation and enforcement of the EU consumer protection rules is key to increasing consumer confidence.
Izvrševanje zakonodaje v EU je pač še vedno daleč od enotnega, številke pa kažejo znatne razlike med državami članicami pri sredstvih, namenjenih za nadzor trga, in številu udeleženih inšpektorjev.
Enforcement across the EU is, however, far from uniform and figures show significant differences between Member States in terms of budgets for market surveillance and numbers of inspectors involved.
o poročilu o politiki konkurence za leto 2008
on the Report on Competition Policy 2008
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov Error!
OPINION O f the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 18
– ob upoštevanju člena 107(3)(b) in (c) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (nekdanji člen 87(3)(b) in (c) Pogodbe ES),
– having regard to Article 107(3)(b) and (c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex-Article 87(3)(b) and (c) of the EC Treaty),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o politiki konkurence za leto 2008
– having regard to the Commission's Report on Competition Policy 2008
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij (uredba ES o združitvah)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the
UL L 24, 29.
control of concentrations between undertakings (EC Merger Regulation )
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2790/1999 z dne 22. decembra 1999 o uporabi člena 81(3) Pogodbe za skupine vertikalnih sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1400/2002 z dne 31. julija 2002 o uporabi člena 81(3) Pogodbe za skupine vertikalnih sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj na področju motornih vozil
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector
– ob upoštevanju odločbe Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena
– having regard to Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation grated to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. decembra 2008 „Dokapitalizacija finančnih institucij v trenutni finančni krizi: omejitev pomoči na najmanjšo potrebno in zaščitni ukrepi za preprečevanje neupravičenega izkrivljanja konkurence“
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 5 December 2008 entitled 'The recapitalisation of financial institutions in the current financial crisis: limitation of aid to the minimum necessary and safeguards against undue distortions of competition
UL C 10, 15.1.2009, str.
OJ C 10, 15.1.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 17. decembra 2008 o začasnem okviru Skupnosti za ukrepe državne pomoči v podporo dostopa do sredstev v trenutni finančni in gospodarski krizi
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 17 December 2008 on a temporary Community framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z 9. februarja 2009 "Navodila glede prednostnih nalog izvrševanja Komisije pri uporabi člena 82 Pogodbe ES za izključevalna ravnanja, s katerimi prevladujoča podjetja zlorabljajo svoj položaj"
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 9 February 2009 entitled ‘Guidance on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings’
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 23. julija 2009 o ponovni vzpostavitvi uspešnega poslovanja in oceni ukrepov prestrukturiranja v finančnem sektorju v sedanji krizi na podlagi pravil o državni pomoči
– having regard to Commission Communication of 23 July 2009 on the return to viability and the assessment of restructuring measures in the financial sector in the current crisis under the State aid rules
– ob upoštevanju bele knjige Komisije z dne 2. aprila 2008 o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES
– having regard to the Commission White Paper of 2 April 2008 on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0187 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0187 . ,
– ob upoštevanju obvestila Komisije o kodeksu najboljše prakse pri izvajanju nadzornih postopkov glede državne pomoči
– having regard to the Commission Notice on a Best Practices Code on the conduct of State aid control proceedings
3. in obvestila Komisije o izvrševanju zakonodaje o državni pomoči na nacionalnih sodiščih
3. and the Commission Notice on the enforcement of State aid law by national courts
– ob upoštevanju smernic Komisije o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja
– having regard to the Commission Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection
– ob upoštevanju pregleda državnih pomoči za leti 2008 in 2009,
– having regard to the State Aid Scoreboards for 2008 and 2009,
– ob upoštevanju pregleda Komisije z dne 7. avgusta 2009 o jamstvih in dokapitalizacijskih shemah v finančnem sektorju v sedanji krizi,
– having regard to the Commission's review of 7 August 2009 of guarantee and recapitalisation schemes in the financial sector in the current crisis,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. februarja 2005 o državni pomoči v obliki nadomestil javnih storitev
– having regard to its resolution of 22 February 2005 on State aid in the form of public service compensation
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0033 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2005)0033 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10 . marca 2009 o poročilih o politiki konkurence za leti 2006 in 2007
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2009 on the Reports on Competition Policy 2006 and 2007
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0099 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0099 . ,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. marca 2009 o cenah hrane v Evropi
- having regard to its resolution of 26 March 2009 on food prices in Europe
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0191 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0191 . ,
– ob upoštevanju pisne izjave Parlamenta z dne 19. februarja 2008 o preiskavi in odpravi zlorabe moči velikih supermarketov, delujočih v Evropski uniji
– having regard to Parliament’s written declaration of 19 February 2008 on investigating and remedying abuse of power by large supermarkets operating in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju členov 48 in 119(2) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 48 and 119(2) of its Rules of Procedures,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0025/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0025/2010 ),
A. ker so izjemne gospodarske okoliščine v zadnjih dveh letih zahtevale izredne ukrepe,
A. whereas the exceptional economic circumstances of the last two years have necessitated exceptional measures,
B. ker se je Evropska unija prvič odločila za uporabo člena 107(3)(b) in (c) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
B. whereas the European Union has taken the unprecedented step of having recourse to Article 107(3)(b) and (c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
C. ker je v kriznem času pravilno delovanje trgov bistvenega pomena in bi se morala konkurenčna pravila uporabljati prožno, a natančno,
C. whereas at times of crisis well-functioning markets are essential, and competition rules should be applied flexibly but strictly,
D. ker bi protekcionizem in izkrivljanje konkurence krizo samo poglobila in podaljšala,
D. whereas protectionism and a distortion of competition would only deepen and prolong the crisis,
E. ker lahko vse večji proračunski primanjkljaj in javni dolg v številnih državah članicah za leta, mogoče celo desetletja, upočasnita oživljanje gospodarstva in njegovo rast,
E. whereas the growing budget deficit and public debt in many Member States may slow down economic recovery and economic growth for years, possibly decades, to come,
F. ker vlade držav članic kot odziv na krizo od oktobra 2008 podeljujejo državna jamstva za bančna posojila; ker je bilo izdanih precej zavarovanih obveznic, ki so bankam zagotovile precejšen vir financiranja in jih zavarovale pred tveganji finančnega sistema,
F. whereas Member State governments have granted guarantees on bank funding as a response to the financial crisis since October 2008; whereas the issuance of guaranteed bonds has been sizeable and has provided banks with a significant source of funding and insurance against the risks faced by the financial system,
G. ker empirične analize kažejo, da so jamstva vlad držav članic sprožila določeno število posledic, tudi izkrivljanje, in se je na primer zmanjšal obseg zasebnih obveznic, to pa je treba upoštevati pri tehtanju možnosti, ali naj se podaljšajo v leto 2010,
G. whereas empirical analyses suggest that the Member State governments’ guarantees have generated a number of effects and distortions, such as a reduction of the spread of private bonds, which need to be taken into account when considering extending them in 2010,
H. ker je početje večnacionalnih podjetij, ki davčne oaze in središča z ugodnim davčnim sistemom znatno izkoriščajo kot del strategije izogibanja plačilu davkov, v nasprotju z načelom poštene konkurence,
H. whereas the ability of transnational businesses to make extensive use of tax havens and offshore centres as part of their tax avoidance strategies contravenes the principle of fair competition,
I. ker je davčno upravljanje pomemben dejavnik za ohranjanje ugodnih pogojev poštene konkurence in za spodbujanje delovanja notranjega trga,
I. whereas tax governance is an important factor in maintaining favourable conditions for fair competition, and in enhancing the functioning of the internal market,
1. pozdravlja poročilo o politiki konkurence za leto 2008, zlasti glavno poglavje o kartelih in potrošnikih; podpira ustanovitev enote za odnose s potrošniki; ugotavlja, da karteli povzročajo škodo potrošnikom; obžaluje, da potrošniki težko izkoristijo prednosti konkurence;
Welcomes the Report on Competition Policy 2008, particularly its focus chapter on cartels and consumers; supports the creation of the Consumer Liaison Unit; notes that the existence of cartels harms consumers; regrets the difficulty for consumers to reap the benefits of competition;
5. poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu podrobno in vsako leto poroča, kako je ukrepala po njegovih priporočilih, ter pojasni razloge za morebitno odstopanje od njih;
Calls on the Commission to report to Parliament in detail and annually about the follow-up to Parliament’s recommendations, and explain any departure from Parliament’s recommendations;
8. ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj nujno pregleda kadrovske vire v generalnem direktoratu za konkurenco in zagotovi, da bo zadevno osebje opravilo delo, ki ga je vse več;
Recalls its request to the Commission to undertake an urgent review of staff resources at the Directorate-General for Competition and ensure that the resources allocated meet the increasing workload;
11. poziva Komisijo, naj kot pravno podlago za prihodnjo zakonodajo o notranjem trgu uporabi člen 12 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (nekdanji člen 153(2) Pogodbe ES), ki jasno določa, da se „pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju drugih politik in dejavnosti Unije upoštevajo zahteve varstva potrošnikov“;
Calls on the Commission to make use of Article 12 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex Article 153(2) of the EC Treaty), which states clearly that 'consumer protection requirements shall be taken into account in defining and implementing other Union policies and activities', as a legal basis for future internal market legislation;
15. poudarja, da mora Komisija pozorno nadzorovati uporabo državne pomoči in s tem zagotoviti, da se takšna ureditev podpore ne bi uporabila za zaščito državne industrije na škodo notranjega trga in evropskih potrošnikov;
Stresses that it is important for the Commission to monitor the use of State aid carefully in order to ensure that these support arrangements are not used to protect national industries in a manner detrimental to the internal market and European consumers;
20. izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi subvencij in izkrivljanj, do katerih prihaja zaradi jamstev za bančna posojila, ki jih podeljujejo vlade držav članic; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni obseg subvencij za jamstva za bančna posojila in tako analizira njihovo skladnost s konkurenčnim pravom EU in potrebne ukrepe za odpravo izkrivljanj zaradi teh jamstev;
Is concerned about the subsidies and distortions generated by the guarantees on bank funding granted by Member State governments; urges the Commission to assess the extent of subsidies related to guarantees on bank funding and thus analyse their conformity with EU competition law and the measures needed to correct any distortions related to those guarantees;