natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izvajanje tega načela otežuje več težav: i) pomanjkanje ozaveščenosti podjetij in nacionalnih organov o obstoju načela vzajemnega priznavanja; ii) pravna negotovost glede področja uporabe načela in dokaznega bremena, ker ni vedno možno jasno opredeliti, za katere kategorije izdelkov velja vzajemno priznavanje; iii) tveganje za podjetja, da njihovi izdelki ne bodo imeli dostopa do trga v namembni državi članici; iv) med pristojnimi organi posameznih držav članic ni rednega dialoga.
The implementation of this principle is hampered by several problems: (i) the lack of awareness of enterprises and national authorities about the existence of the mutual recognition principle; (ii) the legal uncertainty about the scope of the principle and the burden of proof, because it is often unclear to which categories of product mutual recognition applies; (iii) the risk for enterprises that their products will not get access to the market of the Member State of destination; (iv) the absence of regular dialogues between competent authorities in different Member States.
Z vzpostavitvijo ustreznih postopkov je torej treba preprečiti, da bi nacionalni tehnični predpisi ustvarjali nezakonite ovire za prost pretok blaga med državami članicami.
It is therefore necessary to lay down procedures to ensure that national technical rules do not create illegal barriers to the free movement of goods between Member States.
Poročevalec je podal spremembe k predlogu uredbe, da bi bilo področje uporabe bolj jasno, za boljši dostop gospodarskih subjektov do informacij ter za olajšanje nadzorne naloge Evropske komisije.
The draftsman has made changes to the proposal for a regulation in order to make its scope clearer, to improve access to information for economic operators and to make the Commission's task of monitoring easier.
Predlogi sprememb predvidevajo tudi povečanje odgovornosti izvrševalca Skupnosti, saj je Komisija kot varuhinja pogodb je dolžna svojo nadzorno nalogo dejavneje opravljati.
The amendments also seek to increase the responsibility of the Community's executive arm: as the guardian of the Treaties, it has a duty to exercise its monitoring role more actively.
Ta prepoved se nanaša na vse nacionalne ukrepe, ki lahko neposredno ali posredno, dejansko ali potencialno ovirajo trgovino blaga v Skupnosti.
That prohibition covers any national measure which is capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-Community trade in goods.
Zadevni stavek se nadomesti z uvodnima izjavama 1a in 1b, ki določata prepoved vseh nacionalnih ukrepov, ki lahko neposredno ali posredno, dejansko ali potencialno ovirajo trgovino v Skupnosti.
This sentence has been replaced by Recitals 1a and 1b, which spell out the ban on any national measure which is capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially.
(1a) Vsa pravila trgovanja držav članic, ki lahko neposredno ali posredno, dejansko ali potencialno ovirajo trgovino v Skupnosti, je treba upoštevati kot ukrep z enakim učinkom kot količinske omejitve pri uvozu ter so zato v skladu s členom 28 Pogodbe prepovedana.
(1a) Any trade rules in the Member States which are capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, have to be deemed to be a measure having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports and, accordingly, are prohibited by Article 28 of the Treaty.
Standardi, ki veljajo enako za domače in uvožene izdelke in njihova uporaba lahko zmanjša obseg prodaje izdelkov, načeloma tudi predstavljajo ukrepe enakega učinka, ki so po členu 28 Pogodbe prepovedani.
Thus, standards which are applicable without distinction to national and imported products and the application of which is likely to reduce their volume of sales also constitute, in principle, measures having equivalent effect which are prohibited by Article 28 of the Treaty.
Postopek, predviden v predlogu uredbe, predstavlja izjemo pri načelu vzajemnega priznavanja.
The procedure laid down in the proposal for a regulation represents an exception to the principle of mutual recognition.
Namen uvodnih izjav 1a in 1b je opredeliti prepoved vseh nacionalnih ukrepov, ki lahko neposredno ali posredno, dejansko ali potencialno ovirajo trgovino v Skupnosti.
The purpose of Recitals 1a and 1b is to spell out the ban on any national measure which is capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially.
Predstavljajo opozorilo, namenjeno državam članicam, ki temelji na sodni praksi Sodišča
They constitute a warning directed at the Member States, based on the case law of the Court of Justice
Glej zlasti sodbe z dne 11. julija 1974 Dassonville, 8/74, Rec. str.
See, in particular, the judgments of 11 July 1974, Dassonville, 8/74, ECR p.
837, točka 5; z dne 19. junija 2003 Komisija proti Italiji, C-420/01, Rec. str.
837, paragraph 5; 19 June 2003, Commission v Italy, C-420/01, ECR p.
I-6445, točka 25; z dne 26. maja 2005 Burmanjer in drugi, C-20/3, Rec. str.
I-6445, paragraph 25; 26 May 2005, Burmanjer and others, C-20/3, ECR p.
I-4133, točka 23 ter z dne 20. februarja 1979 Rewe-Zentral 'Cassis de Dijon', 120/78, Rec. str.
I-4133, paragraph 23; and 20 February 1979 Rewe-Zentral 'Cassis de Dijon', 120/78, ECR p.
(1b) Sistem, ki za uvozna dovoljenja ali vse druge podobne postopke ohranja zahtevo, čeprav le formalno, je po praksi Sodišča načeloma v nasprotju s členom 30 Pogodbe.
(1b) According to the Court of Justice a system which maintains the requirement, even a purely formal one, for import licences or any other similar procedure is, in principle, contrary to Article 30 of the Treaty.
Nalaganje uvoznih formalnosti, ki ustvarjajo sistem preventivne odobritve, lahko ovira trgovino v Skupnosti ter dostop do trga izdelkov, ki so izdelani v drugih državah članicah in se v njih zakonito tržijo.
The fact of imposing import formalities which create a system of preventive authorisation is actually capable of hindering intra-Community trade and of hindering market access for products which are lawfully manufactured and marketed in other Member States.
Ovira je še večja, če sistem izpostavlja izdelke, ki zadevajo dodatne stroške.
The obstacle is even more serious if the system exposes the products concerned to additional costs.
V teh okoliščinah to ni le preprosta omejitev ali preprosta prepoved nekaterih podrobnih pravil prodaje.
In such circumstances this is not a simple restriction or simple prohibition of certain sales arrangements.
Nalaganje preventivne odobritve je zato treba upoštevati kot oviro v trgovini med državami članicami, ki spada v področje uporabe člena 28 Pogodbe.
The fact of imposing preventive authorisation must therefore be considered to constitute a barrier to trade between the Member States which falls within the scope of Article 28 of the Treaty.
Glej sodbe z dne 8. februarja 1983 Komisija proti Združenemu kraljestvu, znana kot "mleko UHT", 124/81, Rec. str.
See the judgments of 8 February 1983, Commission v United Kingdom, known as 'UHT milk', 124/81, ECR p.
203, točka 9 in z dne 5. julija 1990 Komisija proti Belgiji, C-304/88, Rec. str.
203, paragraph 9 and 5 July 1990, Commission v Belgium, C-304/88, ECR p.
I-2801, točka 9; glej tudi sodbo z dne 26. maja 2005 Komisija proti Franciji, C-212/03, Rec. str.
I-2801, paragraph 9; see also the judgment of 26 May 2005, Commission v France, C-212/03, ECR p.
I-4213, točka 16, ter sodbo z dne 23. oktobra 1977 Franzén, C-189/95, Rec.
I-4213, paragraph 16, and the judgment of 23 October 1977, Franzén, C-189/95, ECR p.
5909, točka 71. .
5909, paragraph 71. .
(2) Če zakonodaja ni usklajena, lahko nacionalni organi nezakonito ustvarijo ovire za prost pretok blaga med državami članicami, ko za izdelke iz drugih držav članic, kjer se izdelki zakonito tržijo, uporabijo tehnični predpis, s katerim določijo zahteve, ki jih morajo taki izdelki izpolnjevati, na primer zahteve glede poimenovanja, oblike, velikosti, teže, sestave, predstavitve, označevanja in embalaže.
(2) Obstacles to the free movement of goods between Member States may be unlawfully created by the national authorities, in the absence of harmonisation of legislation, as a consequence of applying, to goods coming from other Member States where they are lawfully marketed, technical rules laying down requirements to be met by such goods, such as those relating to designation, form, size, weight, composition, presentation, labelling and packaging.
Zadnji stavek te uvodne izjave je zajet v novih uvodnih izjavah 1a in 1b.
The final sentence of this recital is covered by the new Recitals 1a and 1b.
(7a) Direktiva 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov o storitvah informacijske družbe 1 države članice zavezuje, da Komisiji in drugim državam članicam posredujejo vse osnutke tehničnih predpisov o industrijskih izdelkih in kmetijskih proizvodih, vključno s proizvodi iz rib, ter nanje naslovijo obvestilo z razlogi, zaradi katerih je takšne tehnične predpise potrebno vpeljati.
(7a) Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services 1 obliges Member States to communicate to the Commission and the other Member States any draft technical rules concerning industrially manufactured products and agricultural (including fish) products and a statement of the grounds which make the enactment of such technical rules necessary.
Vendar je treba zagotoviti, da se po sprejetju nacionalnega tehničnega predpisa za posebne izdelke pravilno uporabi načelo vzajemnega priznavanja v posameznih primerih.
It is necessary, however, to ensure that, following the adoption of a national technical rule, the principle of mutual recognition is correctly applied in individual cases to specific products.
Ta uredba določa postopek za uporabo načela vzajemnega priznavanja v posameznih primerih, ter predvideva obveznost pristojnega organa, da dokaže tehnične ali znanstvene razloge, zaradi katerih se določeni izdelek v sedanji obliki na nacionalnem trgu, v skladu s členoma 28 in 30 Pogodbe o ES, ne more tržiti.
This Regulation lays down a procedure for the application of the principle of mutual recognition in individual cases, through the obligation for the national authorities to specify the technical or scientific grounds on which the specific product in its current form cannot be authorised on the national market, in accordance with Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty.
V okviru te uredbe nacionalnim organom ni treba pojasnjevati samega tehničnega predpisa.
National authorities are not required under this Regulation to state the grounds for the technical rule itself.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 2006/96/ES (UL L 363, 20.12.2006, str.
Directive last amended by Council Directive 2006/96/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p.
(8a) Ločiti je treba med obveznostjo zagotavljanja potrošniku nekaterih informacij o izdelku s pritrjevanjem nekaterih informacij na izdelek ali s priložitvijo dokumentov, kot so navodila za uporabo, ter med obveznostjo zagotavljanja teh informacij v določenem jeziku.
(8a) A distinction must be drawn between the obligation to provide the consumer with specific information concerning the product by affixing certain specifications to the product or by appending to it documents such as instructions for use, and the obligation to provide such information in a given language.
Obveznost zagotavljanja nekaterih informacij o izdelku s pritrjevanjem nekaterih specifikacij na izdelek ali priložitev dokumentov zato predstavlja za namene te uredbe 'tehnično pravilo', medtem ko obveznost zagotavljanja obveznih navedb označevanja in navodil za uporabo najmanj v jeziku območja, na katerem se morajo izdelki tržiti, za namene te uredbe ni 'tehnično pravilo'.
This is why the obligation to provide specific information concerning a product by affixing certain specifications to the product or by appending documents to it constitutes a 'technical rule' for the purposes of this Regulation, whereas the obligation to provide mandatory labelling information and instructions for use at least in the language(s) of the area in which those products are to be marketed does not constitute a technical rule within the meaning of this Regulation.
Namen te uvodne izjave je poleg zagotavljanja ustrezne informacije za nosilce gospodarske dejavnosti in potrošnike tudi pojasnitev področja uporabe te uredbe v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča.
The reason for this recital is the concern not only to ensure proper information for operators and consumers but also to clarify the scope of this regulation in accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice.
Sodišče je v svoji sodbi COLIM NV (C-33/97) opredelilo, kaj zajema pojem 'tehnično pravilo' in je to treba v uvodni izjavi pojasniti, da se zagotovi ustrezno izvajanje te uredbe.
In its COLIM NV judgment (C-33/97) the Court of Justice spelled out what was and was not covered by the idea of a 'technical rule', and this must therefore be clarified in a recital so as to ensure the satisfactory application of this regulation.
(8b) Postopki predhodne odobritve za namene te uredbe niso tehnično pravilo.
(8b) Procedures entailing prior authorisation do not constitute a technical rule within the meaning of this Regulation.
Obstajajo nacionalni postopki odobritve dajanja izdelkov v promet (medicinski proizvodi).
There are national procedures for authorising the marketing of products (medical products).
Obdobje mirovanja po zakonodaji Skupnosti za vse postopke predhodne odobritve ni obvezno in se zato ta uredba ne uporablja.
Under Community law, where any prior authorisation procedure is concerned there is no obligation to have a standstill period, and this regulation therefore does not apply.
(9) Direktiva 2001/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2001 o splošni varnosti proizvodov določa, da se lahko tržijo samo varni izdelki.
(9) Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety specifies that only safe products may be placed on the market .
Zato je treba iz področja uporabe te uredbe izločiti ukrepe, ki jih nacionalni organi sprejemajo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, s katero izvajajo Direktivo 2001/95/ES.
It is necessary, therefore, to exclude from the scope of this Regulation measures taken by the national authorities pursuant to national laws implementing Directive 2001/95/EC.
(9) Direktiva 2001/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2001 o splošni varnosti proizvodov določa, da se lahko tržijo samo varni izdelki in glede varnosti izdelkov določa obveznosti za proizvajalce in distributerje .
(9) Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety specifies that only safe products may be marketed, and lays down the obligations of producers and distributors with regard to product safety .
Ta direktiva pooblašča organe, da v primeru proizvodov, ki predstavljajo resno nevarnost, storijo vse potrebno za hitro uveljavitev ustreznih ukrepov, navedenih v členu 8(1)(b) do (f) Direktive.
Under that Directive the authorities are also entitled to take the requisite steps so as to apply appropriate measures, such as those referred to in Article 8(1)(b)-(f) of the Directive, with the requisite speed in cases where products pose a serious risk.
Zato je primerno iz področja uporabe te uredbe izločiti ukrepe, ki jih nacionalni organi sprejemajo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, s katero izvajajo člen 8(1)(d) do (f) in člen 8(3) Direktive 2001/95/ES.
Measures taken by the national authorities pursuant to national laws implementing Article 8(1)(d)-(f) and Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/95/EC should therefore be excluded from the scope of this Regulation .
Predlog spremembe natančno določa vsebino Direktive 2001/95/ES o varnosti proizvodov.
This amendment clarifies the content of Directive 2001/95/EC on product safety.
Ukrepe, ki jih organi držav članic sprejmejo v skladu s členom 50(3)(a) in členom 54 Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002, je zato treba izločiti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
Measures taken by the Member States' authorities pursuant to Article 50(3)(a) and Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 should therefore be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Omeniti je treba člen 54 Uredbe št. 178/2002, ki predvideva nujne ukrepe umika iz prometa v primeru, če Komisija na področju varnosti živil opusti ukrepanje.
It is necessary to refer to Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, which provides for emergency measures to withdraw products from the market in the event of the Commission failing to act with regard to food safety.
(11a) Veljavna uredba ne posega v direktive Skupnosti o uskladitvi ukrepov za varstvo zdravja ljudi, živali ali rastlin, ki določajo postopke spremljanja upoštevanja teh ukrepov.
(11a) This Regulation is without prejudice to Community directives which harmonise measures concerning the protection of human, animal or plant health and which lay down procedures for monitoring compliance with such measures.
Obstaja poseben postopek na področju varstva ljudi, živali in zdravstvenega varstva rastlin, ki se še vedno uporablja, ker so preverjanja v Evropski uniji že usklajena.
There is a specific procedure concerning the protection of human, animal and plant health which continues to apply, because monitoring is already harmonised within the European Union.
Vsak poseben postopek, ki je že usklajen, je izključen iz področja uporabe predloga uredbe (glej sodbo C 249/92) in zato ni zajet v pravilih o prevalitvi dokaznega bremena, v obdobju mirovanja itd.
Any specific procedure which has already been harmonised is excluded from the scope of the proposal for a regulation (see judgment C-249/92) and is thus not covered by the rules concerning the inversion of the burden of proof, the standstill period, etc.
(14) Nacionalni organi morajo v vsakem primeru dokazati, da je uporaba nacionalnih tehničnih predpisov pri posameznih izdelkih, zakonito trženih v drugi državi članici, skladna z dovoljenimi izjemami.
(14) It is for the national authority to show in each case that the application of national technical rules to specific products lawfully marketed in another Member State falls within the permitted exceptions.
(14) Nacionalni organi morajo v vsakem primeru dokazati, da je uporaba nacionalnih tehničnih predpisov pri posameznih izdelkih, zakonito trženih v drugi državi članici, skladna z dovoljenimi izjemami , in da se ne more uporabiti manj omejevalnih ukrepov .
(14) It is for the national authority to show in each case that the application of national technical rules to specific products lawfully marketed in another Member State falls within the permitted exceptions and that less restrictive measures cannot be used.
Pisno obvestilo, ki ga nacionalni organ pošlje gospodarskemu subjektu, mora slednjemu omogočiti, da v dobri veri predloži pripombe na vse pomembne vidike predvidenega sklepa o omejitvi dostopa do trga.
The written notice sent to the economic operator by the national authority should enable the former to submit comments, in good faith, on all the relevant aspects of the intended decision to limit access to the market .
Organ mora zato v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta obvestiti o tehničnih in znanstvenih razlogih sprejetja predvidenega sklepa.
The authority should consequently inform the economic operator concerned of the technical and scientific reasons for the intended decision, in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
Če gospodarski subjekt do konca določenega roka ne odgovori, nacionalnim organom nič ne preprečuje, da sprejmejo bolj omejujoče ukrepe.
If there is no response from the economic operator by the end of the time allowed, there is nothing to prevent the national authority taking more restrictive measures.
Treba je uravnotežiti obveznosti med subjektom in namembno državo članico.
It is essential to balance obligations between the operator and the Member State of destination.
Zagotoviti je treba, da lahko država, če gospodarski subjekt v določenem roku ne odgovori, naloži dodatno nacionalno tehnično pravilo.
Consequently, it has to be ensured that if the economic operator has not responded within the time allowed the State may impose an additional national technical rule.
Ne zadeva slovenske različice.
See also the amendment to Article 9.
Ta uredba se uporablja za sklepe v zvezi s katerim koli industrijskim izdelkom ali kmetijskim proizvodom, vključno s proizvodi iz rib, ki se zakonito trži v drugi državi članici, sprejete na podlagi tehničnega predpisa, če je neposredni ali posredni učinek tega sklepa kar koli od naslednjega:
This Regulation applies to decisions taken in respect of any industrially manufactured product or agricultural product, including fish products, lawfully marketed in another Member State, on the basis of a technical rule, where the direct or indirect effect of that decision is any of the following:
Člen 2, odstavek 1, alinea 1, točka (c)
Article 2, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1, point (c)
(c) zahteva po prilagoditvi izdelka ali vrste izdelka pred dajanjem na trg ali nadaljnjim trgovanjem z njim ali za omogočanje uporabe oziroma v primerih vozil, vožnje in registracije;
(c) to require modification of the product or type of product before it can be placed or kept on the market , or to permit its use or, in the case of vehicles, its registration or use ;
Člen 3, odstavek 2, točka (a)
Article 3, paragraph 2, point a
(a) členi 8(d), (e) ali (f) Direktive 2001/95/ES;
(a) Article 8(d), (e) or (f) of Directive 2001/95/EC;
(a) členi 8 (1) (d) do (f) in 8(3) Direktive 2001/95/ES;
(a) Article 8 (1) (d) - (f) and Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/95/EC;
Predlog spremembe določa ukrepe umika iz prometa, ki veljajo za vse kategorije izdelkov v primeru resne nevarnosti.
The amendment spells out the measures for withdrawal from the market applicable to all product categories in the event of serious risk.
(b) členom 50(3)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002;
(b) Article 50(3)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002;
(b) členom 50(3)(a) in členom 54 Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002;
(b) Article 50(3)(a) and Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002;
Predlog spremembe tako izključuje iz sedanje uredbe člen 54 Uredbe št. 178/2002, ki predvideva nujne ukrepe umika iz prometa v primeru, če Komisija na področju varnosti živil opusti ukrepanje.
The amendment hereby excludes from this regulation Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, which provides for emergency measures to withdraw products from the market in the event of the Commission failing to act with regard to food safety.
Člen 4, odstavek 1, alinea 2 a (novo)
Article 4, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 a (new)
Nacionalnim organom ni treba pojasnjevati samega tehničnega predpisa, če se ga lahko obrazloži v okviru Direktive 98/34/ES.
National authorities shall not be required to state the grounds for the technical rule itself where this has already been done under Directive 98/34/EC.
Če v uvodni izjavi 7(a) pojasnjujemo razlog za obstoj te uredbe v odnosu do obstoječe Direktive 98/34, je treba v besedilu opozoriti na povezavo med dvema zakonodajnima instrumentoma.
Given that Recital 7a explains the relationship between the regulation and Directive 98/34, the operative part of the regulation needs to include a reference to that relationship.
Nacionalni organ obvesti Komisijo o sklepu o začetku postopka iz tega člena in o vseh po tem sklepu sprejetih ukrepih.
The national authority shall inform the Commission of the decision to commence the procedure laid down by this article and of all action taken following that decision.
Komisija mora zato, da lahko opravlja svojo nadzorno nalogo, biti obveščena o sklepu o začetku postopka in o vseh po tem sklepu sprejetih ukrepih.
To enable the Commission to carry out its monitoring function, it must be informed of the decision to commence the procedure and of all action taken following that decision.