natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prav zaradi te vrste peticij so člane Odbora za peticije označili za "detektive za direktive".
It is through this type of petition that the members of the Petitions Committee have been branded the 'Directive Detectives'.
To ni nujno prijetna oznaka, kaže pa na pristop, zakaj se državljani vse pogosteje obračajo na ta odbor.
Not necessarily a very comfortable description to live with, even if it does describe a certain approach which the Committee has been called upon to adopt more and more frequently.
Takšne peticije zadevajo na primer obširne infrastrukturne projekte, ki ovirajo pravice iz prava EU, povezane z okoljem in dediščino, težave, povezane z obdelavo odpadkov, varstvom narave in divjih živali, temeljne pravice do zakonito pridobljene lastnine in številna druga področja odgovornosti, za katera je pristojna EU.
Examples include the petitions received concerning large infrastructure projects which impede upon environmental or heritage rights recognised in EU law, problems related to the treatment of waste, problems relating to the protection of nature and wild-life, fundamental rights to legitimately acquired property and many other areas of responsibility for which the EU has competence.
· Peticije, povezane z osebnimi pravicami : te so ponavadi bolj osebne narave in vsebujejo pritožbe posameznikov glede številnih težav, povezanih z izvajanjem notranjega trga in prostim pretokom oseb.
· Individual rights petitions : which are usually of a more personal character and consist of appeals from individuals regarding the many problems related to the application of the internal market and free movement of persons.
Takšne peticije zadevajo na primer priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, pravico do pokojnine ali druge socialne pravice, zahtevke za prebivanje, čezmejna potovanja in identifikacijo, zahtevke posameznikov za azil itd.
Such examples here include the recognition of professional qualifications, rights to pensions or other social entitlement, residence requirements, cross-border travel and identification, individual claims for asylum and so on.
(Tovrstna vprašanja se lahko naslovijo tudi na center SOLVIT na Komisiji, čeprav so prejete peticije pogosto preveč zahtevne, da bi jih mogel rešiti.)
(Issues covered can also be addressed to the SOLVIT unit at the Commission although petitions received tend to be often too complex for SOLVIT to resolve.)
Iz takšne poenostavljene razdelitve je mogoče bolj razvidno, zakaj je potrebna široka paleta pravil in postopkov za obravnavanje posameznih peticij, zlasti kadar jih ni mogoče uvrstiti v samo eno od teh kategorij.
From such a simplified categorisation it may be seen perhaps more clearly why it is necessary to have a broad range of rules and procedures to deal with each petition received, especially when petitions do not always fall within one of these categories alone.
Do neke mere je tudi razvidno, zakaj vprašanja, kot je dopustnost peticij, v okviru obstoječih pravil niso vedno tako preprosta, in zakaj se pogosto sprejme širša razlaga, ki dopušča možnost, da je vlagatelj peticije upravičeno vložil peticijo, in se legitimnega vprašanja ne poskuša izključiti iz parlamentarnega pregleda.
It also shows, up to a point, why such questions as admissibility of petitions may not always be so straightforward under the existing rules and why, again, a broad interpretation is usually adopted which gives any benefit of doubt to the petitioner rather than try to exclude a legitimate issue from parliamentary scrutiny.
Vseeno je pomembno poudariti, da je bilo zlasti leta 2008 vedno več peticij ocenjenih za nedopustne.
Nevertheless, it is important to note that especially in 2008, a growing proportion of petitions received have been deemed inadmissible.
Med njimi niso bile samo peticije o vprašanjih, za katera so pristojne države članice ali ki so vsebovale pritožbe proti pravnim odločitvam pristojnega pravnega organa, pa tudi ne peticije, ki bi jih lahko bolje obravnaval varuh človekovih pravic ali nacionalne službe za peticije oziroma varuhi človekovih pravic.
These were not only petitions for which the substance was clearly of Member State competence, or where the issue concerned an appeal against legal decisions taken by a competent judicial organ, or where the matter was better dealt with by the European Ombudsman or national petitions/ombudsman services.
Bile so tudi peticije, ki so bile tako kratke, da tako rekoč niso imele smisla ali niso bile zadosti utemeljene in razumljive.
These were petitions which were received but which were so short as to be relatively meaningless, or were otherwise insufficient in substance or in comprehension.
Število slednjih se je povečalo zaradi enostavnosti vlaganja peticij po elektronski pošti in pomanjkanja ustreznega sistema registracije, ki bi omogočil ločevanje plev od zrnja.
The latter category has grown because of the ease with which petitions are submitted electronically linked to the lack of adequate registration facilities capable of differentiating the wheat from the chaff.
Čeprav je bilo v zvezi s tem že nekaj storjeno, gre očitno za strukturno težavo, ki jo mora rešiti uprava Parlamenta.
Although some steps have been taken to address this matter, it does denote a structural problem which must be resolved by Parliament's administration.
Zadnja uvodna točka, ki bi jo bilo treba v prihodnje upoštevati, zadeva različne kategorije peticij.
One final introductory point which should be borne in mind for the future relates to the different categories of petition.
Lizbonska pogodba daje evropskim državljanom veliko dodatnih pravic in pomembno možnost, da se prek državljanske pobude še bolj vključijo v proces oblikovanja politike EU.
Under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty European citizens are given a significant additional right and an important practical opportunity to become even more involved in the EU political process by means of the so-called "Citizens' Initiative".
Čeprav naj bi bile takšne pobude v prvi vrsti naslovljene na Evropsko komisijo (kar lahko glede na pravico naslavljanja peticij na Evropski parlament zmede), bodo morebiti državljanom resnično omogočile, da bodo lahko predlagali novo zakonodajo.
Although such initiatives are supposed to be addressed in the first instance to the European Commission (which, bearing in mind that the right to petition is to Parliament may appear somewhat confusing!) they will eventually provide the citizen with a real opportunity to propose new legislation.
Ta pomembna razširitev postopka za obravnavanje peticij bi seveda morala vplivati na prihodnje delo Odbora za peticije, če in kadar se bo lizbonska pogodba izvajala (in upajmo, da se bo).
This important extension to the petitions process should naturally have repercussions on the work of the Petitions Committee in the future, if and when the Lisbon Treaty is hopefully implemented.
Odbor za peticije je leta 2008 o tem večkrat razpravljal.
This was discussed on a number of occasions in 2008 in the Petitions Committee.
Število peticij
Numbers of petitions.
Statistični podatki prikazujejo delo Odbora za peticije enostransko.
A one dimensional guide to the work of the Petitions Committee is provided by statistics.
Čeprav zanje kot za veliko statističnih podatkov velja, da več skrivajo kot razkrivajo, je treba v letnem poročilu nameniti pozornost številkam.
As with a lot of statistics they hide more than they explain, yet in an annual report one is obliged to pay attention to the numbers.
Odbor za peticije je tako leta 2008 zabeležil 1886 peticij v primerjavi s 1506 leta 2007, kar je bilo za petdeset odstotkov več kot leta 2006.
Thus, in 2008 the Petitions Committee registered 1886 petitions compared to 1506 in 2007, which was fifty per cent more than in 2006.
Največ prejetih peticij je bilo iz Nemčije in Španije, sledijo Romunija, Italija, Poljska in Združeno kraljestvo.
The largest number of petitions was received from Germany and Spain, followed by Romania and Italy, Poland and the UK.
Tudi Irska je vložila znatno število peticij – sorazmerno največ na prebivalca.
Ireland also submitted a considerable number of petitions, the - largest per capita, bearing in mind the size of the population.
Večje število peticij posameznikov je bilo iz Nemčije in Romunije, peticije iz Španije in Francije pa so pogosteje vložile nevladne organizacije ali združenja lokalnih skupnosti in lokalni organi, ki so se pritoževali nad domnevnim nespoštovanjem direktiv EU.
A larger proportion of individual petitions were received from Germany and Romania whereas Spain and France were more likely to contribute petitions which were backed up by NGOs or community associations and local bodies complaining about the alleged lack of respect for the application of EU Directives.
Zdi se, da se nemški in italijanski državljani bolj nagibajo k vlaganju peticij, ki zadevajo EU.
It would appear that German and Italian citizens are more likely to have submitted petitions concerning the EU itself.
Elektronsko vložene peticije so bile prvič številčnejše od pisno poslanih peticij (59,2 % proti 40,8 %).
For the first time the number of petitions submitted electronically were more than those submitted by letter (59.2 v 40.8%).
Za približno 30 % do 40 % se je tudi povečalo število nedopustnih peticij.
The proportion of inadmissible petitions has also increased from about 30% to 40%.
Zadevne države leta 2008
Concerned country in 2008
(Države, ki so vložile več kot 10 peticij)
(Countries with more than 10 petitions)
Prejete peticije
Petitions received
Poglavitne teme v letu 2008
K ey issues of 2008.
Glavna tema
Main theme
Število peticij
Number of petitions
Temeljne pravice
Fundamental Rights
Glavna tema vlagateljev peticij je še vedno okolje, njegovo varstvo in ohranjanje.
The main focus of attention of petitioners continues to be the environment, its protection and preservation.
Odbor ima zares edinstveno možnost, da oceni odzive evropskih državljanov na to, kako države članice izvajajo (ali pa ne) evropsko pravo v zvezi s tem.
The Committee is indeed in a unique position to assess the reactions of European citizens to the way in which Member States apply, or do not apply, European law in this respect.
Odbor je najprej organiziral javno obravnavo, nato pa pripravil podrobno poročilo o vplivu predlaganega plinovoda Severni tok pod Baltskim morjem na podlagi peticij, zlasti iz Poljske in Litve, prav zaradi resnih pomislekov o okoljskem vplivu v baltski regiji.
It was because of serious concern for the environment in the Baltic region that the Committee first organised a public hearing and then prepared a detailed report on the impact of the proposed Baltic Sea - Nordstream gas pipeline, based upon petitions received from Poland and Lithuania in particular.
Obravnava, ki je potekala ob koncu januarja 2008 in jasno pokazala željo in pripravljenost odbora, da sodeluje z drugimi parlamentarnimi odbori, v tem primeru z Odborom za zunanje zadeve in Odborom za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, se je izkazala za učinkovit način zagotavljanja informacij vseh strani tako poslancem Evropskega parlamenta kot navzočim vlagateljem peticij, ki so govorili ob obravnavi.
Demonstrating very clearly the Committee's desire and willingness to cooperate with other parliamentary committees, in this case the Foreign Affairs Committee and the Industry & Energy Committee, the hearing which took place at the end of January 2008, proved very effective as a means of providing information from all interested parties to both MEPs and petitioners who were present and who also spoke at the hearing.
Izjave sta dala tudi komisarja Piebalgs in Dimas.
Commissioners Piebalgs and Dimas also made statements.
Poročilo, ki je bilo kasneje na plenarnem zasedanju sprejeto z veliko večino, je Parlamentu omogočilo referenčna izhodišča glede potrebne večje raznolikosti v energetski politiki, čeprav je na prvo mesto postavilo potrebo po obvarovanju izredno krhkega okolja v plitvem Baltskem morju
The report which was subsequently approved by a very large majority in plenary provided benchmark positions for the Parliament in relation to the need to further diversify energy policy while prioritising the need to safeguard the very fragile environmental domain of the shallow Baltic Sea.
Poročilo Marcina Libickega. .
Report by Marcin Libicki.
Irska se je med letom pogosto pojavljala v razpravah odbora o okoljskih peticijah.
Ireland figured prominently in the Committee's discussions on environmental petitions during the course of the year.
Odbor je na obravnavi zastopal nacionalni odbor za načrtovanje, ko je obravnaval nasprotovanje odlagališču, ki ga je vložila akcijska skupina Nevitt Lusk (peticija št. 295-05) zaradi možnega negativnega vpliva na vrtnarsko proizvodnjo in premajhno upoštevanje določb okvirne direktive o vodah s strani irskih organov, saj je lokacija nad pomembnim vodonosnikom.
The Committee was represented at the hearing of the National Planning Board when it considered the opposition to the landfill site from the Nevitt Lusk Action group (Petition 295-05) due to the potentially negative impact on the region's horticultural production and the lack of consideration by the Irish authorities for the provisions of the Water Framework Directive given that the site was over a significant aquifer.
Odbor še naprej izraža svoje pomisleke o tem, da se irska državna agencija za ceste ni menila za direktive EU, ko je načrtovala traso avtoceste M3 pri Tari, glede na njeni uničujoči vpliv na del najpomembnejše nacionalne dediščine.
The Committee also continued to voice its concerns about the way in which Ireland's National Roads Agency had ignored EU Directives when it planned the route of the M3 motorway near Tara given the devastating impact on part of the nation's most important heritage sites.
Odbor je dejansko dodal ta dejavnik k potekajočemu postopku za ugotavljanju kršitev proti Irski, ker ni ustrezno izvajala direktive o presoji vplivov na okolje.
The Commission indeed added this factor to an on-going infringement procedure against Ireland for not having properly implemented the Environmental impact assessment Directive.
Sporočila, izmenjana z irskim ministrom za okolje, pa so kljub temu dokazala, da so bili mnogi pomisleki odbora upoštevani in so se po njih ravnali, zlasti tiste, ki zadevajo številne peticije o pitni vodi.
Communications with the Irish Environment Minister nevertheless demonstrated that many of the Committee's concerns have been heeded and acted upon, notably as regards a number of petitions related to drinking water.
Peticije številnih novih irskih vlagateljev, ki so bile prejete in obravnavane leta 2008, zadevajo načrtovani obrat za utekočinjeni zemeljski plin blizu Shannona, gradnjo kontejnerskega terminala pri Corku, načrtovane sežigalnice v Carranstownu in v bližini šole College Nobber
A number of new Irish petitions received and considered in 2008 concern the proposed LNG facility near Shannon, the construction of a container terminal near Cork, proposed incinerator plants at Carranstown and College Nobber,
Odbor je ob številnih priložnostih menil, da bi morali nacionalni organi premisliti o obratih za pridobivanje metana kot alternativni možnosti za predlagane sežigalnice, saj dosti manj vplivajo na kakovost zraka. , ter težave z iskanjem odlagališča odpadkov v Haulbowlinu.
The Committee has on a number of occasions considered that national authorities should consider methanisation plants as alternatives to proposed incineration plants as they impact much less on the air quality. and other problems with the siting of landfill in Haulbowline.
Stalna skrb odbora za pravice lastnikov nepremičnin je odboru v letu 2008 vzela precej časa.
The Committee's ongoing concern for the rights of property owners also took up a lot of Committee time in 2008.
Povedati je treba, da to področje ostaja v pristojnosti držav članic, čeprav je obveznost držav članic, da vzpostavijo in ohranijo delujoč zakonodajni okvir za odziv na te zahteve.
This, it must be said, remains a Member State competence, although there is an obligation of all Member States to establish and maintain a functioning legislative framework to respond to such claims.
Obisk odbora za ugotavljanje dejstev v Romuniji lani junija je omogočil koristno razpravo o tej temi z romunskim parlamentom in pravosodnim ministrstvom.
A fact-finding visit by members of the Committee to Romania last June enabled a most useful discussion to take place on this subject with the Romanian Parliament and Justice Ministry.
Odbor za peticije je prejel več kot sto pisem v zvezi s težavami, s katerimi se soočajo mala in srednja podjetja, vključno z dobrodelnimi ustanovami in drugimi službami, zaradi zavajajočih podjetij za imeniške storitve.
The Petitions Committee received over four hundred letters concerning the problems faced by small and medium sized companies, including charitable foundations and other services, with misleading 'Directory Companies'.
Izkazalo se je, da je ta pojav splošno razširjen in da so bila zaradi njega mnoga mala podjetja primorana v plačilo storitev, za katere niso zavestno sklenila pogodbe, ker so dobila namerno zavajajoče predloge.
This proved to be a widespread phenomenon which led to many small companies being intimidated for payments for a service which they had not knowingly contracted into as a result of deliberately misleading proposals having been made.
Odbor je vlagatelje peticij sprejel na svojih sejah, kjer je njihove zadeve predstavil poslancem, organizirana pa je bila tudi posebna delavnica v okviru poročila, ki je bilo decembra 2008 predstavljeno na plenarnem zasedanju
The Committee welcomed petitioners to its meetings to make their case to members and a special workshop was organised in the context f a report which was submitted to plenary in December 2008
Poročilo Simona Busuttila v imenu Odbora za peticije. .
Report by Simon Busuttil on behalf of the Committee on Petitions. .
Odbor je ob podpori vsega Parlamenta zahteval boljša pravna varovala za potencialne žrtve tovrstne prakse in revizije obstoječega prava EU, da bi zagotovili zmožnost držav članic za spoprijemanje s tem pojavom.
The Committee, supported by the whole Parliament, has demanded better legal safeguards for potential victims of such practices and a revision of existing EU law to ensure Member States are better equipped to tackle the phenomenon.
Še eno pomembno vprašanje, ki ga je preiskoval Odbor za peticije, zadeva prakso številnih uradov Jugendamt v Nemčiji, ki so odgovorni za dobrobit otrok v primeru ločitve ali razveze staršev.
Another of the high-profile issues investigated by the Petitions Committee was concerned with the practices of a number of Jugendamt offices in Germany which have the responsibility for handling child welfare in the event of the divorce or separation of parents.
Večina težav je nastala v primeru staršev različnih narodnosti, kjer je bilo precej strahu pred diskriminacijo.
The main problems arose with parents of different nationalities where there were serious fears of discrimination..
Odbor je moral znova upoštevati dejstvo, da so bile mnoge posebne pritožbe v nacionalni pristojnosti.
Again, the Committee had to remain mindful of the fact that many of the specific complaints were matters of national competence.
Kljub temu je bil skupaj z Bundestagom in pristojnim ministrstvom dosežen napredek, v nekaterih primerih pa so vlagatelji peticij dobili opravičila.
Nevertheless, in conjunction with the Bundestag and the Ministry responsible progress was made and in some cases the petitioners received apologies.
Dokument, ki ga je objavil sekretariat ob koncu leta, je bil koristno pojasnilo poslancem in jim je omogočil, da so si pritožbe ogledali v pravi luči, hkrati pa pokazalo, da odbor za peticije težave resno obravnava.
A document produced by the secretariat at the end of the year provided helpful clarification for members allowing them to place the claims in perspective while indicating the seriousness with which the Committee views the problem.
Odbor za peticije je opravljal preglede izvajanja v juniju 2007 sprejetega poročila preiskovalnega odbora za krizo družbe „Equitable Life Assurance Society“, ki je bil ustanovljen kot posledica prejetih peticij.
The Petitions Committee conducted reviews of the implementation of the Report by the Equitable Life Committee of Inquiry, adopted in June 2007, which had been established as a result of the petitions received.
Poročilo je vsebovalo seznam niza pomanjkljivosti v regulativnem okviru v sektorju finančnih storitev Združenega kraljestva, povezanih z izvajanjem prava Skupnosti.
The report itself catalogued a series of shortcomings in the regulatory framework in the UK financial services sector related to the implementation of Community law.
Za predsednika Evropskega parlamenta je bila zagotovljena podrobna ocena junija 2008, po razpravi z vlagatelji peticij.
A detailed assessment was provided for the President of the European Parliament in June 2008, following discussions with petitioners.
Evropski parlament še vedno čaka na podrobno sporočilo britanske vlade o tem vprašanju in je izrazil veliko nezadovoljstvo, ker britanski organi zavlačujejo in zamegljujejo zadevo.
A detailed communication is still awaited from the British Government on this issue by the European Parliament which has expressed its strong dissatisfaction with the delay and the obfuscation practiced by the British authorities.
Postopki odbora
Committee procedures.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodu, je Odbor za peticije poklican, da obravnava različne vrste peticij, ki pokrivajo številna raznolika področja dejavnosti EU.
As was indicated in the introduction, the Petitions Committee is called upon to address many different types of petition covering many varied areas of EU activity.
Da se s tem ukvarja, dokazuje pomembnost, ki jo institucije pripisujejo mnenju evropskih državljanov; to ga tudi razlikuje od mnogih nacionalnih parlamentov, ki nimajo podobnih proaktivnih organov, ki bi branili pravice državljanov.
That it does so at all bears witness to the importance which the institution attaches to the views of the European citizen; it also sets it apart from most national parliaments who have not established such pro-active bodies to defend the rights of citizens.
Delo odbora temelji na obveznostih iz Pogodbe in poslovniku Parlamenta ter na tesnem sodelovanju z Evropsko komisijo in različnimi organi v državah članicah.
The work of the Committee is based upon the Treaty obligations and Parliament's rules of procedure, and close cooperation with the European Commission and the different authorities in Member States.
Njegove metode so se razvile dokaj pragmatično kot odziv na zahteve, naslovljene nanj, dosežen je bil tudi napredek na področju preglednosti in sodelovanja javnosti, zlasti v tem zakonodajnem obdobju.
Its methods have developed rather pragmatically in response to the demands made upon it and a number of advances in terms of transparency and public participation have been made in the course of this legislature in particular.
O teh smo poročali v prejšnjih letnih poročilih.
These have been reported on before in previous annual reports.
Delovna skupina predsedstva Evropskega parlamenta je v svojem tretjem vmesnem poročilu izrazila številna priporočila, ki bodo še bolj okrepila vlogo in pristojnosti Odbora za peticije, če se bodo izvajala.
A working group of the Bureau of the European Parliament has made a number of recommendations in its Third Interim Report which, if they are implemented, would further consolidate the role and responsibilities of the Petitions Committee.
Odbor za ustavne zadeve, ki je deloma deloval po nasvetu Odbora za peticije, je tudi predstavil številne predloge, ki bodo spremenili sedanji poslovnik in ga, upajmo, poenostavili.
The Constitutional Affairs Committee, acting partly on the advice of the Petitions Committee, has also made a number of proposals which will modify the existing Rules of Procedure and hopefully simplify them.
Kljub temu, da lahko doseženo ocenimo kot napredek, mora odbor priznati, da so njegove izvršilne pristojnosti v praksi mnogo preveč omejene.
Yet, in spite of what may hopefully be considered to be advances, the Committee must recognise that its practical enforcement powers remain much too limited.