natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– na podlagi ciljev iz člena 3 in v skladu z merili iz člena 7 določi smernice, ki so v pomoč pri izbirnem postopku in postopku spremljanja ter pri prijavnem obrazcu ,
– in the light of the objectives set out in Article 3 and in accordance with the criteria laid down in Article 7 , establish guidelines to assist with the selection and monitoring procedures, as well as the application form;
Komisija je pristojna za komuniciranje v zvezi z znakom evropske dediščine in njegovo vidnostjo na evropski ravni zlasti z oblikovanjem in vzdrževanjem posebne spletne strani .
The Commission shall be responsible for the communication and the visibility of the European Heritage Label at Union level, in particular through the creation and the maintenance of a specific website.
Komisija je pristojna za komuniciranje v zvezi z znakom evropske dediščine in njegovo vidnostjo na evropski ravni zlasti z oblikovanjem in vzdrževanjem posebnega spletnega mesta , novim logotipom ter povečevanjem prepoznavnosti in privlačnosti spomenikov v evropskem merilu, na primer z uporabo novih tehnologij ter digitalnih in interaktivnih sredstev, pa tudi z iskanjem sinergij z drugimi evropskimi pobudami.
The Commission shall be responsible for the communication and the visibility of the European Heritage Label at Union level, in particular through the creation and the maintenance of a specific website and a new logo , raising the profile and attractiveness of the site on a European scale, for example by using the possibilities offered by new technologies and digital and interactive means and by seeking synergies with other European initiatives .
Vsa obvestila in priporočila evropskega izbirnega sveta iz členov 8(6), 10(4a) in 15(5) se objavijo na tem spletnem mestu.
All the notifications and recommendations of the European panel referred to in Article 8 ( 6 ) , Article 10 ( 4a ) and Article 15 ( 5 ) shall be published on th at website.
Novi logotip bi prispeval k prepoznavnosti znaka dediščine EU in dvigovanju zavesti o tej pobudi.
A new logo would contribute to the visibility of the EUHL and in an awareness raising process of this initiative.
Delo evropskega izbirnega sveta mora biti kar se da pregledno.
The work of the European Panel has to be as transparent as possible.
Komisija zagotovi zunanjo in neodvisno ocenjevanje ukrepa za znak evropske dediščine.
The Commission shall ensure the external and independent evaluation of the European Heritage Label action.
Pri prihodnjih ocenjevanjih znaka evropske dediščine se lahko po potrebi preučuje primernost širjenja pobude na tretje države, ki sodelujejo v programu Kultura, ali celo še dlje.
If necessary, future evaluations of the European Heritage Label could examine the appropriateness of enlarging the initiative to the third countries participating in the Culture Programme, or even beyond that.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v šestih mesecih po končanih ocenjevanjih predloži poročilo o njih.
The Commission shall present a report on these evaluations to the European Parliament and the Council within six months of the finalisation of the evaluations.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v šestih mesecih po končanih ocenjevanjih predloži poročilo o njih , po potrebi skupaj z ustreznimi predlogi .
The Commission shall present a report on these evaluations to the European Parliament and the Council within six months of the finalisation of the evaluations accompanied, if appropriate, by relevant proposals .
Spomeniki, katerim je bil znak že podeljen v okviru medvladne pobude za znak evropske dediščine, in so na ozemlju držav članic, se ocenijo [v letu po začetku veljavnosti tega sklepa].
Sites already awarded the label in the framework of the intergovernmental European Heritage Label and situated in Member States shall be assessed [the year following the entry into force of the present Decision].
Za te spomenike je treba predložiti novo prijavo na podlagi novih meril in postopkov iz členov 6 do 9, ki jo Komisiji pošlje zadevna država članica najpozneje do 31. januarja [of the year in question].
A new application shall be submitted for these sites on the basis of the new criteria and procedures laid down in Articles 6 to 9 and shall be transmitted to the Commission by the relevant Member States at the latest on 31 January [of the year in question].
Nove prijave oceni evropski izbirni svet.
The new applications shall be assessed by the European panel.
Če eden od spomenikov, ki jih predlaga neka država članica, ne izpolnjuje meril, ali če so potrebne nadaljnje informacije, evropski izbirni svet preko Komisije naveže stike z zadevno državo članico, da preuči, ali se prijava pred končno odločitvijo še lahko izboljša.
If one of the sites proposed by a specific Member State does not fulfil the criteria or if further information is needed, the European panel shall initiate a dialogue with the Member State via the Commission in order to examine whether the application can be improved before a final decision is taken.
Po potrebi se organizira ogled spomenika.
Visits to the site may be organised if necessary.
Evropski izbirni svet pripravi poročilo o spomenikih s priporočilom za podelitev znaka evropske dediščine do konca [the year in question], razen če se od države članice zahteva še nadaljnja pojasnila.
The European panel shall deliver a report on sites with a recommendation for the attribution of the European Heritage Label by the end of [the year in question] unless further clarifications are necessary from the Member State .
Komisija potem uradno imenuje spomenike.
The Commission shall then officially designate the sites.
Znak evropske dediščine se načeloma spomenikom iz tega odstavka podeljuje redno pod pogoji iz členov 14 in 15 ter pod pogojem da se ukrep nadalje izvaja.
The European Heritage Label shall be awarded to the sites covered by this paragraph in principle on a permanent basis under the conditions laid down in Articles 14 and 15 and subject to the continuation of the action.
Kandidati, ki niso na končnem seznamu, se v naslednjih letih lahko ponovno prijavijo za predizbiro na nacionalni ravni.
Candidates which were not retained in the final list may submit a new application for the pre-selection at national level in the following years.
Države članice, ki niso sodelovale pri medvladni pobudi za znak evropske dediščine imajo možnost, da predlagajo največ štiri spomenike za podelitev znaka evropske dediščine [the second year following the entry into force of the present Decision].
Member States which did not participate in the intergovernmental European Heritage Label shall have the possibility to propose up to a maximum of four sites for the attribution of the European Heritage Label in [the second year following the entry into force of the present Decision].
Za te spomenike je treba predložiti novo prijavo na podlagi meril in postopkov iz členov 6 do 9, ki jo Komisiji pošlje zadevna država članica najpozneje do 31. januarja [of the year in question].
An application shall be submitted for these sites on the basis of the criteria and procedures laid down in Articles 6 to 9 and shall be transmitted to the Commission by the relevant Member States at the latest on 31 January [of the year in question].
Izbirni postopek in postopek spremljanja za znak evropske dediščine iz členov 6 do 15 se začneta [the third year following the entry into force of the present Decision].
The selection and monitoring procedure for the European Heritage Label as laid down in Articles 6 to 15 shall start in [the third year following the entry into force of the present Decision].
Novi znak dediščine Evropske unije izhaja iz medvladnega znaka evropske dediščine.
The new European Union Heritage Label derives from the intergovernmental European Heritage Label.
Kljub temu se ukrep EU, ki temelji na novih, skupnih, jasnih in preglednih merilih, enotni prijavi in novem logotipu, zelo razlikuje od medvladne pobude.
Nevertheless, it is an EU Action based on new, common, clear and transparent criteria, common application and new logo, well differentiated from the intergovernmental initiative.
Spomeniki bodo ohranili znak evropske dediščine, ki jim je bil podeljen, in bodo v postopku za pridobitev znaka dediščine EU enako obravnavani kot vsi drugi kandidati.
The sites awarded with the EHL will preserve it and will be treated equally to all other candidates for the EUHL.
S tem se ne bo zmanjšala vrednost obstoječega medvladnega znaka, se bo pa povečal ugled novega znaka.
This will not diminish the value of the old intergovernmental label and will give stronger credit to the new one.
[Leto n]
[Year n]
Sprejetje tega sklepa
Adoption of the Decision
[leto n+1]
[Year n+1]
Ponovno ocenjevanje spomenikov, ki jim je že bil dodeljen znak evropske dediščine v okviru medvladne pobude
Re-evaluation of the sites already awarded the European Heritage Label in the framework of the intergovernmental initiative
[leto n+2]
[Year n+2]
Države članice , ki niso sodelovale pri medvladni pobudi, prvič predložijo spomenike
First submission of sites by the Member States which did not participate in the intergovernmental initiative
Predizbor, ki ga opravijo države članice
Pre - selection by the Member States
[leto n+3]
[Year n+3]
Končno imenovanje spomenikov
Final designation of the sites
[leto n+4]
[Year n+4]
[leto n+5]
[Year n+5]
Končno imenovanje spomenikov in spremljanje
Final designation of the sites and monitoring
[leto n+6]
[Year n+6]
Ocenjevanje znaka evropske dediščine
Evaluation of the European Heritage Label
[leto n+7]
[Year n+7]
Končno imenovanje spomenikov Ocenjevanje znaka evropske dediščine
Final designation of the sites Evaluation of the European Heritage Label
[leto n+8]
[Year n+8]
[leto n+9]
[Year n+9]
[leto n+10]
[Year n+10]
[leto n+11]
[Year n+11]
[leto n+12]
[Year n+12]
[leto n+13]
[Year n+13]
Glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe člena 10(2).
See justification for amendment to Article 10, paragraph 2.
Evropske institucije se v svojih prizadevanjih za dosego širše kohezije in solidarnosti soočajo z izzivi, kot sta oblikovanje skupne evropske identitete in spodbujanje zanimanja za Evropsko unijo in njen nastanek.
The formation of a joint European identity and the growth in interest in the European Union and its genesis are challenges with which the European institutions are faced in their bid to achieve broad cohesion and solidarity.
Predlog Komisije izvira iz prvotne zasnove za znak evropske dediščine, ki je nastala leta 2005 kot ena od predlaganih rešitev za razkorak med EU in njenimi državljani.
The Commission proposal stems from the original concept of the European Heritage Label which emerged in 2005 as one of the proposed solutions towards closing the gap between the EU and its citizens.
Projekt je prvotno aprila 2006 začelo nekaj evropskih držav (Francija, Španija in Madžarska) na medvladni ravni, njegov namen pa je bil izkoristiti našo skupno kulturno dediščino in zgodovino, da bi se okrepil občutek pripadnosti evropskih državljanov Evropski uniji.
Initially launched in April 2006 by a few European states (France, Spain, and Hungary) on an intergovernmental basis, it aimed at making use of our shared cultural heritage and history to strengthen European citizens' sense of belonging to Europe.
Znak je bil doslej podeljen 64 spomenikom v 17 državah članicah EU in Švici.
To-date, a total of 64 sites located in 17 EU Member States and Switzerland have been awarded the label.
Države članice so 20. novembra 2008 pozvale Komisijo, naj preoblikuje medvladno pobudo za znak evropske dediščine v uradni ukrep EU, ki bo sicer imel še vedno enako nalogo, vendar bo deloval usklajeno, s čimer bo zagotovljen njegov dolgoročni uspeh.
On November 20th, 2008, the Member States asked the European Commission to transform the intergovernmental European Heritage label into a formal action of the EU that would serve the same purpose, but would streamline its functioning and thereby ensure its long-term success.
Posvetovanje s širšo javnostjo in ocena učinka sta pokazala, da je lahko znak evropske dediščine uspešnejši pri doseganju svojih ciljev, če deluje kot pobuda Evropske unije z enako natančno opredeljenimi merili in vzpostavljenim močnim sistemom za spremljanje, ki bo prispeval k povečanju prepoznavnosti in verodostojnosti znaka – brez težav, ki nastanejo z nestabilnim, krožnim upravljanjem, slabim komuniciranjem in nezanimanjem za sodelovanje.
A broad public consultation as well as an Impact Assessment showed that the European Heritage Label could better reach its goals if it operated as a European Union initiative, with the same well-defined criteria, along with a strong monitoring system in place that would help step up the Label's visibility and credibility - without the drawbacks inherent in an unstable, rotating administration, poor communication and waning interest in participation.
Predlagani novi znak evropske dediščine bi se moral za dosego svojega političnega cilja osredotočiti na simbolno in/ali izobraževalno vrednost in ne na estetsko vrednost spomenika, saj je to naloga drugih pobud na področju kulturne dediščine, ter vztrajati na tesnem sodelovanju med spomeniki, ki imajo ta znak, z izmenjavo zgledov najboljše prakse in pobudami za skupne projekte.
In order to achieve its political goal, the new European Heritage Label, as proposed, should focus on symbolism and/or educational value, rather than on the beauty of a site - as other initiatives in the field of cultural heritage already do - and should insist on close cooperation among the labelled sites so as to share best practices and initiate common projects.
Stališče poročevalke
The Rapporteur's position
Poročevalka pozdravlja predlog Komisije, da se znak evropske dediščine uporabi kot orodje, med drugimi bolj učinkovitimi sredstvi, za zapolnitev vrzeli med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državljani in kot sporočilo, da je evropska zgodovina rezultat raznolike vendar bogate in dopolnjujoče se skupne kulturne dediščine ter kot izraz spoštovanja, ker EU izvira iz trdnih vrednot kot so svoboda, demokracija, spoštovanje človekovih pravic, kulturna raznolikost, strpnost in solidarnost.
The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission's proposal to use the European Heritage label as a tool, among other more efficient ways, to fill in the gap between the European Union and its citizens; as a way to stress that European history is the result of the diverse, yet rich and complementary, common cultural heritage; as an appreciation that the EU is rooted in strong values such as freedom, democracy, respect for human rights, cultural diversity, tolerance and solidarity.
Odločitev držav članic, da se znak evropske dediščine ureja na ravni EU, bo prispevala ne le k njegovi večji prepoznavnosti, ugledu in kredibilnosti ampak tudi k doseganju že dolgo zastavljenih plemenitih ciljev o koheziji in solidarnosti med evropskimi državljani.
The decision of the Member States to place the European Heritage Label within the framework of the EU will not only help increase its visibility, prestige and credibility, but will contribute to achieving long-sought ideals of cohesion and solidarity among European citizens.
Sprva je poročevalka izrazila idejo o znaku zunaj meja Evropske unije, ki bi se ga lahko uporabilo kot velikopotezno sredstvo v zunanji politiki, saj je prispevek evropske kulture svetu zelo priznan.
The rapporteur originally expressed the idea of a label which would extend beyond the borders of the European Union and which could be used as an ambitious means serving outwards-oriented politics, owing to the widely recognised contribution of European culture to the world.
Kljub temu se zdi v tem času bolj realistično znak obravnavati kot sredstvo za poglabljanje kohezije Evropske unije med državami članicami in njihovimi prebivalci, preden se ga poskuša podeljevati zunaj meja EU za prispevke k zgodovini človeštva in dediščino, ki izvira iz vrednot, ki so nekoč nastale na naši celini in so bile zanjo značilne.
However, it seems more realistic for the time being to treat the label as a tool for deepening European Union cohesion among Member States and their people, before any attempt is made at using it as an award beyond the EU's borders towards any contribution to human history and heritage originating from the values once born and applied in our continent.
Številne točke predloga pa je treba še izboljšati in bolj pojasniti.
A number of points in the proposal should require, however, further improvement and clarification:
Novi ukrep s konkretnejšimi merili in bolj opredeljenim sistemom spremljanja se bo z novim imenom za znak in novim logotipom razlikoval od svojega predhodnika.
As a new action, with more concrete criteria and a well-defined monitoring system, a new name for a new label and a new logo would differentiate the latter from its forerunner.
Ta predlog poleg poskusnega obdobja ukrepa in njegove izvedbe omogoča obravnavanje vprašanja prehodnih odločb, ki je opisano spodaj.
This suggestion, apart from affording time for testing the action and its implementation, helps to deal with the issue of the transitional provisions, described below.
ŠTEVILO SPOMENIKOV: IZBOR VSAKI DVE LETI
NUMBER OF SITES: SELECTION EVERY 2 YEARS
Letno podeljevanje znaka 27 spomenikom ne bi le zelo povečalo števila spomenikov z znakom v začetnem obdobju, ampak bi zagotovo ogrozilo tudi ugled znaka.
A yearly award of the Label to a maximum of 27 sites per annum would not only dramatically multiply the number of sites bearing it in the early years, but would run a definite risk of lowering the Label's prestige.
Poleg tega bi vplivalo na kakovost postopka spremljanja, zlasti kadar bi ga izvajal evropski izbirni svet, ki bo imel nalogo pregledati poročila spremljanja, ki jih bodo objavile države članice, in izdati priporočila.
In addition, this would impact the quality of the monitoring procedure, especially by the European panel, whose task will be to review the monitoring reports published by Member States and issue recommendations.
Po mnenju poročevalke bi izbor spomenikov vsaki dve leti zagotovil višjo kakovost postopka in izbranih spomenikov ter dovolj časa za predizbor (na ravni držav članic) ter nadaljnji izbor (na evropski ravni), hkrati pa olajšal spremljanje spomenikov.
The rapporteur believes that a bi-annual selection of sites would ensure better quality both of the process and of the selected sites, that it would give more time for the pre-selection (at the Member State level) and the following selection (at the European level), while facilitating site monitoring.
NADNACIONALNI SPOMENIKI
TRANSNATIONAL SITES
Poročevalka se strinja, da je treba zaradi simbolne vrednosti znaka, ki omogoča napredovanje k evropskemu združevanju, nadnacionalne spomenike ugodneje obravnavati, saj spodbujajo skupne značilnosti, mrežno povezovanje in sodelovanje med državami ali regijami.
The rapporteur agrees that owing to the symbolic value of the label as a contributory vehicle towards European integration, transnational sites should be favoured since they promote commonalities; they promote networking, and encourage co-operation and collaboration between States or regions.
Zato je treba nadnacionalne spomenike v vseh državah članicah prednostno vključiti v redno „kvoto“ dveh predlaganih spomenikov na leto.
Therefore, transnational sites should feature prominently in all Member States' ordinary 'quota' of two proposed sites per year.
Država članica bo iz praktičnih razlogov imela vlogo „koordinatorja“ in kontaktne točke v razpravah z evropskim izbirnim svetom in Komisijo.
For practical reasons, a Member State will be the 'coordinator' and will be the contact point in discussions with the European panel and the Commission.
BREZ PREHODNIH ODLOČB
NO TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS
Za poročevalko novi znak ni zgolj preoblikovanje predhodnega ampak priložnost, da se novi ukrep oblikuje na podlagi izkušenj, ki so bile pridobljene z medvladno pobudo.
The rapporteur envisions the new label not merely as a transformation of the old one, but as a chance for creating an action based on the experience accumulated during its existence as an intergovernmental initiative.
Nova dobro opredeljena merila, mrežno povezovanje, izbirni svet in spremljanje nakazujejo drugačno zasnovo novega ukrepa, ki se je ne sme enako obravnavati kot predhodno.
The new well-defined criteria, the networking, the panel and the monitoring of the new action imply a different concept, which should not be seen as identical with the previous one.
Za ohranjanje ugleda starega znaka in spodbujanje ugleda novega niso potrebne prehodne odločbe.
In order to preserve the prestige of the old label and promote the prestige of the new one, no transitional provisions should be needed.
Poleg tega bo zmernejše število spomenikov z znakom omogočilo lažje izvajanje izbirnega postopka in postopka spremljanja.
In addition, a more reasonable number of labelled sites will help keep selection and monitoring procedures manageable.
Število obravnavanih spomenikov mora vedno ostati razumno in reprezentativno.
The number of sites covered each time should stay both reasonable and representative.
V primeru prehodnega obdobja bi lahko več kot sto spomenikov do konca prvih štirih let sodelovalo v pobudi.
If the transitional period occurs, then more than hundred sites could potentially be participating in the initiative by the end of the first 4-year period.
VLOGA EVROPSKEGA IZBIRNEGA SVETA
V. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PANEL
Postavljeno je bilo vprašanje, ali bi bilo mogoče okrepiti vlogo evropskega izbirnega sveta v postopku podeljevanja ali odvzema znaka evropske dediščine določenim spomenikom.
A question was raised as to whether it would be possible to step up the role of the European panel within the process of awarding or withdrawing the EHL from specific sites.
To vprašanje se posredno dotika bolj splošnega pravnega vprašanja, in sicer ali lahko zakonodajalec EU s sekundarno zakonodajo vzpostavi organe s pristojnostjo odločanja, ki jih pogodbe ne predvidevajo.
Indirectly this question touches upon a more general legal question as to whether the EU legislator can create, through secondary legislation, entities with decision-making power, not provided for by the Treaties.
Iz pogodbe (načelo prenosa pristojnosti, člen 5 Pogodbe o EU) in ustaljene sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije je razvidno, da lahko zakonodajalec EU ukrepa samo v mejah svojih pristojnosti in institucionalnem okviru, ki ju določa Pogodba.
It is ostensible from the Treaty (the principle of attribution of competences, Article 5 TEU) and also from well-established case-law of the Court of Justice, that the EU legislator can only act within the limits of competences provided for by the Treaty and also only within the institutional framework provided for by the Treaty.
Člen 17 določa, da Komisija med drugim v skladu s pogodbama „upravlja programe“ in „opravlja usklajevalno, izvršilno in upravno funkcijo“, medtem ko člen 291 Pogodbe o delovanju EU predvideva prenos izvedbenih pooblastil na Komisijo, kadar so potrebni enotni pogoji za izvajanje pravno zavezujočih aktov.
Article 17 TEU provides that the Commission, among its functions, "manages programmes" as well as it "exercise[s] coordinating, executing and management functions" as laid down in the Treaties, while Article 291 TFEU provides that in cases where uniform conditions for implementing legally binding acts are needed, those implementing powers are conferred on the Commission.
Zato izbirnega sveta ne smemo vključiti v postopek podeljevanja ali odvzem znaka spomenikom.
Consequently, the panel may not be involved in the process of awarding to, or withdrawing the label from, sites.
POMEMBNEJŠA VLOGA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
A STRONGER ROLE FOR THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
Iz enakega razloga je pravno težavno podeliti več vpliva Evropskemu parlamentu pri podeljevanju ali odvzemu znaka, kot mu ga pripisuje predlog.
For the same reason it is legally difficult for the European Parliament to be given more power, either in the designation or the withdrawal of the label, apart from its participation as described in the proposal.