natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ukrepi, ki jih je predlagala Komisija, se v tem smislu prav tako obravnavajo naklonjeno, ker se ocena učinka in poznejše zakonodajne rešitve osredotočajo na zmanjšanje upravne obremenitve in hkrati na zaščito interesov zainteresiranih strani.
The measures proposed by the Commission are also looked upon favourably in this context, because the impact assessment and the subsequent legislative solutions focus on reducing the administrative burden while protecting stakeholders' interests.
Zato je predlagana direktiva usklajena z večjo poenostavitvijo, ki jo izvaja Komisija in podpira Parlament.
Therefore, the proposed directive is in line with the greater simplification exercise undertaken by the Commission and supported by the Parliament.
Pripravljavec mnenja prav tako priznava, da so združitve in delitve, ki vključujejo matične in njihove hčerinske družbe, posebni primeri teh poslovnih dejavnosti, pri čemer je obremenitev poročanja mogoče in treba zmanjšati v celotni EU.
The rapporteur also recognizes that mergers and divisions involving parent and their subsidiary companies are particular cases of these business operations where the reporting burden could and should be lessened throughout the EU.
Zato pripravljavec mnenja podpira preoblikovanje sedanje možnosti držav članic, da odobrijo izjeme nekaterih upravnih obveznosti pri združitvah in delitvah matičnih in hčerinskih družb, v zahtevo za celotno EU.
Hence, the rapporteur supports transforming the current Member States' option to grant exceptions from certain administrative obligations in parent-subsidiary mergers and divisions into an EU-wide requirement.
Podobno se zdi, da je tudi zahteva o „dvojem poročanju“, ki izhaja iz skladnosti družb s Tretjo in Šesto direktivo
Similarly, the "double reporting" requirement arising from firms' compliance both with the Third and Sixth Directives
Direktivi Sveta št. 78/855/EGS oziroma št. 82/891/EGS. ter Drugo direktivo
Council Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC, respectively. and with the Second Directive
Direktiva Sveta št. 77/91/EGS. , pretirana upravna obremenitev.
Council Directive 77/91/EEC. seems an excessive administrative burden.
Zato možnost, ki državam članicam omogoča njeno razveljavitev, pomeni pozitiven razvoj.
Hence, allowing the Member States to repeal it constitutes a positive development.
Pripravljavec mnenja prav tako odobrava prilagoditev sedanjih pravil poročanja, da se evropskim podjetjem omogoči uporaba sodobne informacijske tehnologije za namene poročanja.
The rapporteur also endorses adjusting the current reporting rules in order to allow European businesses to utilize modern information technology for reporting purposes.
Živimo v vedno bolj tehnološko napredni Skupnosti, pri čemer morajo njeni zakoni odražati to spremembo.
We live in an ever more technologically savvy Community and its laws should reflect this shift.
Uporaba novih orodij ne bo le zmanjšala upravnih stroškov podjetij, ampak je tudi okolju prijazna.
The employment of these new tools will not only cut businesses' administrative costs but is also environment-friendly.
Priznati je treba, da pripravljavec mnenja ceni izčrpnost ocene učinka o tej temi.
It should be noted that the rapporteur appreciates the comprehensiveness of the impact assessment on this topic.
Dokument, kljub nekaj pretiranih približkih, ki bodo nujno povzročili kvantitativne neustreznosti, zagotavlja ustrezno kakovostno utemeljitev zakonodajnih rešitev, ki jih je predlagala Komisija.
Despite containing a few far-fetched approximations that shall necessarily cause quantitative inaccuracies, the document provides an apt qualitative justification for the legislative solutions proposed by the Commission.
Pripravljavec mnenja upa, da bo Komisija ohranila tako visok standard analize in izboljšala točnost podatkov, kjer je mogoče, za vse prihodnje predloge poenostavitve.
The rapporteur hopes that the Commission will maintain this high standard of analysis and improve data accuracy where possible for all future simplification proposals.
Ta sklic vključuje datum objave načrta združitve na spletni strani.“
That reference shall include the date of the publication of the draft terms of merger on the Internet site.
„Takšna objava se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najpozneje en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev objavi načrt združitve na svoji spletni strani, in sicer v celoti ali pa v obliki sklica ali povezave, ali na kateri koli drugi spletni strani , če nima svoje .
Such publication shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning not later than one month before the day fixed for the general meeting, it makes available the draft terms of merger on its own Internet site in full or by way of reference or hyperlink or , if it has no Internet site of its own, on any other Internet site .
Če družba uporabi to možnost, na osrednji elektronski platformi iz člena 3(4) Direktive 68/151/EGS objavi sklic, ki omogoča dostop do zadevne spletne strani.
Where a company makes use of this possibility it shall publish a reference that gives access to that Internet site , on the central electronic platform referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive 68/151/EEC.
Države članice bi bilo treba spodbujati, da sprejmejo določbe, s katerimi bodo pojasnile, v kakšni meri se tehnična prekinitev storitev na spletni strani, na kateri so dostopne informacije, lahko razlaga kot malomarno dejanje, ki bi bilo v nasprotju z zahtevami za poročanje in dokumentiranje.
Member States should be encouraged to take provisions that clarify to what extent a technical disruption of services on the internet site where information is made accessible can be interpreted as negligent behaviour that would be against reporting and documentation requirements.
Če ima družba svojo spletno stran, bi neobjava informacij lahko vodila do nesporazumov ali dezinformacij za delničarje.
If a company has its own Internet site, failure to publish the information on it could lead to shareholder misunderstanding or disinformation.
Člen 11 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 2
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
„ Če se delničar strinja, da lahko družba posreduje informacije z elektronskimi sredstvi, se lahko kopije pošljejo po elektronski pošti.“
Where a shareholder has consented to the use, by the company, of electronic means for conveying information, copies may be provided by electronic mail.
Brez poseganja v določbe iz pododstavka 1 in če se delničar strinja, da lahko družba posreduje informacije z elektronskimi sredstvi, se lahko kopije pošljejo po elektronski pošti.
Without prejudice to the provisions of subparagraph 1, where a shareholder has consented to the use, by the company, of electronic means for conveying information, copies may be provided by electronic mail.
Namen predloga spremembe je preprečiti, da bi delničarji mislili, da ne morejo več zahtevati papirne kopije, saj bi to pomenilo prelaganje odgovornosti družbe na delničarje.
To prevent shareholders thinking that they can no longer request a paper copy, since this would involve shifting the company’s responsibilities onto the shareholders.
Člen 1 – točka 5 – točka (c)
Article 1 – point 5 – point c
Odstavek 3 se ne uporablja, če spletna stran delničarjem omogoča, da shranijo elektronsko kopijo dokumentov iz odstavka 1, v celotnem obdobju iz odstavka 1.“
Paragraph 3 shall not apply if the Internet site gives shareholders the possibility to save an electronic copy of the documents referred to in paragraph 1, throughout the period referred to in paragraph 1.
„Takšna objava se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najpozneje en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev objavi načrt delitve na svoji ali kateri koli drugi spletni strani.
Such publication shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning not later than one month before the day fixed for the general meeting, it makes available the draft terms of division on its own or on any other Internet site.
Ta sklic vključuje datum objave načrta delitve na spletni strani.“
That reference shall include the date of the publication of the draft terms of division on the Internet site.
„Takšna objava se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najpozneje en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev objavi načrt delitve na svoji spletni strani, in sicer v celoti ali pa v obliki sklica ali povezave, ali na kateri koli drugi spletni strani , če nima svoje .
Such publication shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning not later than one month before the day fixed for the general meeting, it makes available the draft terms of division on its own Internet site in full or by way of reference or hyperlink or , if it has no Internet site of its own, on any other Internet site .
„Če se delničar strinja, da lahko družba posreduje informacije z elektronskimi sredstvi, se lahko kopije pošljejo po elektronski pošti.“
Where a shareholder has consented to the use, by the company, of electronic means for conveying information, copies may be provided by electronic mail.
Člen 2 – točka 5 – točka (c)
Article 2 – point 5 – point c
Odstavek 3 se ne uporablja, če spletna stran delničarjem omogoča, da shranijo elektronsko kopijo dokumentov iz odstavka 1, v celotnem obdobju iz odstavka 1.“
Paragraph 3 shall not apply if the Internet site gives shareholders the possibility to save an electronic copy of the documents referred to in paragraph 1, throughout the period referred to in paragraph 1."
„Objava v skladu s prvim pododstavkom se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najpozneje en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev objavi načrt združitve na svoji ali kateri koli drugi spletni strani.
A publication in accordance with the first subparagraph shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning not later than one month before the day fixed for the general meeting, the company makes available the draft terms of merger on its own or on any other Internet site.
„Objava v skladu s prvim pododstavkom se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najpozneje en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev objavi načrt združitve na svoji spletni strani, in sicer v celoti ali pa v obliki sklica ali povezave, ali na kateri koli drugi spletni strani , če nima svoje .
A publication in accordance with the first subparagraph shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning not later than one month before the day fixed for the general meeting, the company makes available the draft terms of merger on its own Internet site in full or by way of reference or hyperlink or , if it has no Internet site of its own, or on any other Internet site .
Sklic vključuje datum objave načrta združitve na spletni strani.
The reference shall include the date of the publication of the draft terms of merger on the Internet site.
Države članice lahko zaradi tehničnih ali drugačnih razlogov predvidijo začasno prekinitev dostopa do spletne strani, na kateri so objavljene informacije, ali osrednje elektronske platforme.
Member States may make provision for the temporary disruption, due to a technical or other reason, of access to the Internet site where the information is posted or the central electronic platform.
o predlogu Direktive Sveta o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki ureja premike in uvoz kopitarjev iz tretjih držav (kodificirana različica)
on the proposal for a Council directive on animal health conditions governing the movement and importation from third countries of equidae (codified version)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2008)0715 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2008)0715 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0479/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0479/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 - Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0248/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0248/2009 ),
V Bruslju, 23. februar 2009
Brussels, 23 February 2009
Predlog Direktive Sveta o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki ureja premike in uvoz kopitarjev iz tretjih držav (kodificirana različica)
Proposal for a Council directive on animal health conditions governing the movement and importation from third countries of equidae (codified version)
KOM(2008)0715 z dne 2.11.2008 – 2008/0219(CNS)
COM(2008)715 of 2.11.2008 – 2008/219(CNS)
V skladu z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem delovnem postopku za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, še posebej z njegovo 4. točko, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 3. decembra 2008, da bi med drugim preučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predstavila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party, consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, met on 3 December 2008 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je imela na voljo 22 jezikovnih različic predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna jezikovna različica obravnavanega besedila. preučila predlog direktive Sveta, ki kodificira Direktivo Sveta 90/426/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki ureja premike in uvoz kopitarjev iz tretjih držav, ter prišla do naslednjih soglasnih ugotovitev:
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal 22 language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a Council directive codifying Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
1) v uvodni izjavi 3 je treba besedilo „ premike kopitarjev med državami članicami “ spremeniti tako, da se glasi „ premike kopitarjev znotraj in med državami članicami “.
1) In Recital 3, the wording " the movement of equidae between Member States " should be adapted so as to read " the movement of equidae within and between Member States ".
2) kar zadeva prvi odstavek člena 3, natančneje besedilo „ premike registriranih kopitarjev na svojem ozemlju “, je bilo ugotovljeno, da med angleško in nemško jezikovno različico direktive 90/426/EGS obstaja večje neskladje.
2) As far as the first paragraph of Article 3 is concerned, and more specifically the wording " the movement of equidae registered in their territory ", it was acknowledged that a serious discrepancy appears to exist between the English and German language versions of Directive 90/426/EEC.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina meni, da je treba takšno neskladje nedvomno odpraviti.
The Consultative Working Party is of the opinion that such a discrepancy would apparently need to be corrected.
3) Drugo večje neskladje med angleško ter drugimi jezikovnimi različicami dokumenta je bilo ugotovljeno pri členu 4(5)(a)(iv).
3) The existence of another serious discrepancy between the English language version and other language versions of the act was acknowledged as regards Article 4(5)(a)(iv).
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je tudi v tem primeru menila, da je treba to neskladje nedvomno odpraviti.
Also in that case, the Consultative Working Party expressed its view that the discrepancy would apparently need to be corrected.
4) V členu 4(6) je treba uvodno besedilo nadomestiti z naslednjim besedilom: „ Če država članica pripravi ali je pripravila prostovoljen ali obvezen program nadzora nad boleznimi, za katere so dovzetni kopitarji, lahko program v šestih mesecih predloži Komisiji, kar velja od 4. julija 1990 za Belgijo, Dansko, Nemčijo, Irsko, Grčijo, Španijo, Francijo, Italijo, Luksemburg, Nizozemsko, Portugalsko in Združeno kraljestvo, od 1. januarja 1995 za Avstrijo, Finsko in Švedsko, od 1. maja 2004 za Češko, Estonijo, Ciper, Latvijo, Litvo, Madžarsko, Malto, Poljsko, Slovenijo in Slovaško ter od 1. januarja 2007 za Bolgarijo in Romunijo, pri čemer navede predvsem: “.
4) In Article 4(6), the introductory wording should be replaced by the following text: " Where a Member State draws up or has drawn up a voluntary or compulsory control programme for a disease to which equidae are susceptible, it may present the programme to the Commission, within six months from 4 July 1990 for Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and the United Kingdom, from 1 January 1995 for Austria, Finland and Sweden, from 1 May 2004 for the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia and from 1 January 2007 for Bulgaria and Romania, outlining in particular: ".
5) V členu 13(2)(a) je treba sklicevanje „ v členu 5(2) in (3) “ spremeniti tako, da se glasi kot sklicevanje „ v členu 5(2) in (5) “.
5) In Article 13(2)(a), the reference made to " Article 5(2) and (3) " should be adapted so as to read as a reference made to " Article 5(2) and (5) ".
6) V členu 15(a) je treba odstraniti besede „ in vrsti uvoza “.
6) In Article 15(a), the words " and the type of importation " should be removed.
7) V člen 16(1)(f) je treba ponovno vnesti besedilo „ Države članice o uporabi te možnosti obvestijo Komisijo “, ki je navedeno v trenutno veljavnem besedilu pod ustrezno točko v direktivi 90/426/EGS.
7) In Article 16(1)(f), the wording " Member States shall inform the Commission if they make use of this option ", which appears in the currently applicable text of the corresponding point in Directive 90/426/EEC, should be re-introduced.
8) V členu 19(a) je treba izbrisati besede „ ali vrst uvoza “.
8) In Article 19(a), the words " or types of importation " should be removed.
9) V delu B priloge V je treba v skladu z navedbo „ 2006/104/ES “ navesti tudi rok za prenos te direktive v nacionalno pravo.
9) In Annex V, Part B, in correspondence with the indication " 2006/104/EC " the time-limit for transposition of that directive into national law should be mentioned.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 2(1) direktive 2006/104/ES „ Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do datuma pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji “.
According to Article 2(1), first subparagraph, of Directive 2006/104/EC, " Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by the date of accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union at the latest ".
Pogoji v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki ureja premike in uvoz kopitarjev iz tretjih držav (kodificirana različica)
Animal health conditions governing the movement and importation from third countries of equidae (codified version)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o trgovinskih režimih za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov (kodificirana različica)
on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (codified version)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2008)0796 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2008)0796 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 37 in 133 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0018/2009 ),
– having regard to Articles 37 and 133 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0018/2009 ),
UL C 102, 04.04.1996, str.
OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0249/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0249/2009 ),
V Bruslju, 4. marec 2009
Brussels, 4 March 2009
V skladu z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, zlasti z njegovo 4. točko, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala 11. decembra 2008, da bi med drugim preučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je pripravila Komisija.
In accordance with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the consultative working party consisting of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission met on 11 December 2008 in order to consider, inter alia, the abovementioned proposal presented by the Commission.
Skupina je pri preučitvi
On examining
Skupina je imela na voljo 23 jezikovnih različic predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na podlagi francoske različice, saj je bila francoščina izvirni jezik delovnega dokumenta. predloga uredbe Sveta za kodifikacijo uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3448/93 z dne 6. decembra 1993 o trgovinskih režimih, ki se uporabljajo za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov, soglasno ugotovila, da je treba v uvodni izjavi 13 izraz „ali pa“ spremeniti v „ali“.
The working party was able to refer to 23 language versions of the proposal and based its proceedings on the French original version of the working document. the proposal for a regulation of the Council codifying Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products, the working party noted by common agreement that in recital 13 the words ‘ ou bien ’ should be replaced by ‘ ou ’.
pravni svetovalec generalni direktor
Jurisconsult Jurisconsult Director-General
Trgovinski režimi za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov (kodificirana različica)
Trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (codified version)
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravicah potnikov v avtobusnem prevozu in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the rights of passengers in bus and coach transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0817 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0817 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 71(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0469/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 71(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0469/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0250/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport ( A6-0250/2009 ),
(2a) Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da izvzamejo mestni, primestni in regionalni prevoz iz te uredbe, pod pogojem, da z drugimi regulativnimi ukrepi zagotovijo primerljivo raven pravic potnikov.
(2a) Member States should have the possibility to exempt urban, suburban and regional transport from this Regulation if they ensure a comparable level of passenger rights through alternative regulatory measures.