natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice predložijo Komisiji besedilo temeljnih predpisov nacionalne zakonodaje, sprejetih na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Ta direktiva je naslovljena na države članice v skladu s Pogodbama .
This Directive is addressed to the Member States in accordance with the Treat ies .
Zgodovinsko ozadje predloga
Historical background of the proposal
Komisija je leta 2001 predlagala direktivo
In 2001, the Commission presented a proposal for a Directive
KOM(2001) 127. o statusu državljanov tretjih držav, ki so rezidenti za daljši čas.
COM(2001) 127 . concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents.
V tem predlogu je bilo prvotno predvideno, da bi begunci lahko postali upravičeni do statusa rezidenta za daljši čas po petih letih zakonitega in nepretrganega prebivanja v državi članici.
In this proposal, it was originally foreseen that refugees could qualify for long-term resident status after five years of legal and continuous residence in a Member State.
Vendar so se med pogajanji države članice odločile, da se begunci izvzamejo iz področja uporabe direktive.
In the course of the negotiations, it was nevertheless decided by the Member States to exclude refugees from the scope of the Directive.
V Skupni izjavi Sveta in Komisije na Svetu PNZ 8. maja 2003 je bilo nato dogovorjeno, da bo Komisija vložila predlog direktive o razširitvi statusa rezidenta za daljši čas na begunce in osebe, ki uživajo nadomestno zaščito.
Subsequently, in the Joint Statement from the Council and the Commission , made at the JHA Council of 8 May 2003, it was agreed that the Commission would table a proposal for a Directive on the extension of long-term resident status to refugees and persons under subsidiary protection.
Komisija je predlog vložila junija 2007, zanj pa je uporabila enako pravno podlago kot za direktivo, ki naj bi jo spreminjal, in sicer člena 63(3)(a) ter 63(4) Pogodbe ES.
This proposal was tabled by the Commission in June 2007 using the same legal base as the act it was supposed to amend, i.e. Articles 63(3)(a) and 63(4) of the EC Treaty.
Osrednji cilj predloga je zagotoviti pravno varnost upravičencem do mednarodne zaščite, ki so pet let zakonito prebivali v državi članici, glede njihovih pravice do prebivanja v državi članici, pa tudi sklop pravic, primerljivih tistim, ki jih imajo državljani EU.
The main objective of the proposal was to give beneficiaries of international protection who have been legally residing in a Member State for a period of 5 years legal certainty about their right of residence in a Member State, as well as a set of rights comparable to those of EU nationals.
Evropski parlament je predlog obravnaval po postopku posvetovanja, ki je aprila 2008 privedel do sprejetja poročila francoske poslanke Martine ROURE iz skupina PSE.
This proposal was examined by the EP under the consultation procedure and led to the adoption of the report of Martine ROURE (PSE, FR) in April 2008.
Načelni predlogi sprememb, ki jih je sprejel Evropski parlament so:
The principle amendments adopted by the EP were:
– izračun petih let prebivanja pred vložitvijo vloge za priznanje statusa rezidenta za daljši čas;
- the calculation of the five years of residence preceding application for long-term residence status;
– materialni pogoji (stalni in redni vir dohodka, zdravstveno zavarovanje), ki jih morajo izpolnjevati za pridobitev statusa rezidenta za daljši čas – Evropski parlament je želel, da bi bili upravičenci zaradi njihovega posebno ranljivega položaja izvzeti;
- the material conditions (stable resources and sickness insurances) required to get the long-term residence status, from which the EP wanted beneficiaries to be exempted, due to their vulnerability;
– nacionalni pogoji za integracijo, ki naj bi se jih uporabljalo za upravičence do mednarodne zaščite samo na podlagi individualne obravnave;
- the national integration conditions, which should be applied to beneficiaries of international protection only on a case by case basis;
– načelo nevračanja, ki naj bi ga okrepili s strožjimi določbami.
- the principle of non-refoulement, which was to be reinforced through stricter provisions.
Predlog je preučil tudi Svet, pri čimer se je razprava osredotočila na področje uporabe direktive.
The proposal was also examined in the Council, where the debate focused on the scope of the Directive.
Večina delegacij je podpirala vključitev beguncev in upravičencev do nadomestne zaščite v področje uporabe direktive.
A majority of delegations supported the inclusion of both refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection in the scope of the Directive.
Vendar pa se je nekaj delegacij zavzelo za širše področje uporabe direktive, ki bi vključevala tudi druge oblike zaščite, ki jih odobrijo države članice, medtem ko so bile nekatere druge delegacije bolj naklonjene omejitvi področja uporabe le na begunce.
Nevertheless, some delegations argued in favour of a broader scope of the Directive, to include other forms of protection granted by Member States, while some others were in favour of limiting the scope to refugees only.
Ker je bilo za odločitev potrebno soglasje, sporazuma ni bilo možno doseči pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe.
As unanimity was required, no agreement could be reached before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.
Zato se zdaj predlog vrača v Evropski parlament kot del tako imenovanega „omnibusa“.
For this reason the proposal is now coming back to the European Parliament as part of the so-called 'omnibus'.
V skladu z novimi določbami Lizbonske pogodbe bo obravnavan po postopku soodločanja.
Under the new provisions of the Lisbon treaty, it will be dealt with under the co-decision procedure.
Namen predlogov sprememb Komisije je razširiti področje uporabe direktive na upravičence do mednarodne zaščite, ki pet let zakonito prebivajo na področju države članice.
The amendments put forward by the Commission aim at extending the scope of the Directive to beneficiaries of international protection who have been residing legally on the territory of a Member State for a period of 5 years.
Člen 4 direktive je spremenjen tako, da se celotno obdobje azilnega postopka upošteva pri izračunu tega obdobja petih let.
Article 4 of the Directive is amended in order to take whole the duration of the asylum procedure into account for the calculation this 5 years period.
Da bi se izognili tveganju vračanja oseb, je bil dodan člen 8, ki države članice obvezuje, da dovoljenju za prebivanje za daljši čas, ki je bilo odobreno upravičencem do mednarodne zaščite, dodajo posebno opombo o dejstvu, da je bil osebi dodeljen status zaščite.
In order to avoid the risk of refoulement, an amendment is introduced to Article 8 which obliges the Member States to include in the long-term residence permit granted to beneficiaries of international protection a specific remark regarding the fact that the person has been granted protection status.
Omenjeno opombo bi bilo treba ponovno vnesti v drugo dovoljenje za prebivanje za daljši čase, če se upravičenec do mednarodne zaščite, ki mu je bil dodeljen status rezidenta za daljši čas, preseli v drugo državo članico in po petih letih prebivanja pridobi status rezidenta za daljši čas.
If the beneficiary of international protection who has been granted long term residents status moves to another Member State and after five years of residence acquires long-term resident status, then the above mentioned remark should be reproduced in the second long-term residence permit.
Vprašanje, ali upravičenci do mednarodne zaščite, ki jim je dodeljen status rezidenta za daljši čas, ohranijo status mednarodne zaščite v skladu z Direktivo 2004/83/ES, je zunaj področja uporabe te direktive.
The question of whether beneficiaries of international protection who are granted long-term residence status maintain their international protection status under Directive 2004/83/EC is outside the scope of the Directive.
Vendar, če ohranijo svoj status mednarodne zaščite, ostajajo vseeno upravičeni do pravic in ugodnosti, ki so vezane na ta status.
Where they maintain their international protection status, they remain nevertheless entitled to the rights and benefits attached to it.
Zato je bil člen 12 spremenjen, da se razjasni, da se možnosti omejitve načela enakega obravnavanja lahko uporabijo samo v obsegu, ki je združljiv z določbami Direktive 2004/83/ES.
Article 11 is therefore amended in order to clarify that the possibilities for restrictions to the principle of equality are applicable only to the extent that they are compatible with the provisions of Directive 2004/83/EC.
Namen sprememb členov 12 in 22 je zagotoviti spoštovanje načela nevračanja, ki ga zagotavlja Ženevska konvencija, v vseh okoliščinah, ki lahko izhajajo iz uveljavljanja pravic v skladu z Direktivo 2003/109/ES.
The amendments to Articles 12 and 22 aim at ensuring that the principle of non-refoulement, guaranteed by the Geneva Convention, is respected in all situations which may arise in the exercise of the rights conferred by Directive 2003/109/EC.
Natančneje to pomeni, da morajo pred odstranitvijo upravičenca do mednarodne zaščite z ozemlja Unije države članice najprej oceniti, ali se za to osebo še vedno uporablja Direktiva 2004/83/ES in ali bi bila odstranitev v skladu z načelom nevračanja.
This means concretely that before proceeding with the removal of a beneficiary of international protection from the territory of the Union, Member States will first have to assess whether Directive 2004/83/EC still applies to this person and whether the removal would be in compliance with the principle of non-refoulement.
V določenih okoliščinah bi to lahko pomenilo posvetovanje z državo članico, ki je dodelila mednarodno zaščito, če ni ista kot država članica, ki je dodelila status rezidenta za daljši čas (člen12) ali država članica, v kateri oseba prebiva (člen 22).
In certain circumstances this may involve consulting the Member State which granted international protection, if different to the Member State which granted long term residence status (Article 12), or the Member State in which the person resides (Article 22).
Ta predlog bi prinesel neposredne koristi vsem upravičencem do mednarodne zaščite, ki zakonito prebivajo na ozemlju EU več kot pet let, vendar trenutno niso upravičeni do statusa rezidenta za daljši čas.
This is a proposal which would bring direct benefit to all the beneficiaries of international protection who have been residing legally on the territory of the EU for more than 5 years, but currently have no entitlement to long-term resident status.
Odpravil bi razlike v obravnavi državljanov tretjih držav in jim nudi več jasnosti glede njihovega položaja v EU.
It will bring an end to their differential treatment vis-à-vis other third country nationals, and will give them greater certainty about their situation in the EU.
Predvsem bi upravičencem do mednarodne zaščite, ki so postali rezidenti za daljši čas omogočil, da prebivajo v drugi državi članici, kakor je tista, ki jim je dodelila status.
Notably, it would enable beneficiaries of international protection who become long-term residents to take up residence in a Member State other than the one in which they were recognised.
Predlog je zato treba pozdraviti in poročevalec podpira konstruktivni pristop, ki upošteva večino predlogov sprememb Komisije, pa tudi mnoge tehnične spremembe, s katerimi se je Svet strinjal na pogajanjih.
For these reasons this proposal should be welcomed, and therefore your rapporteur is in favour of a constructive approach, taking on board most of the Commission's proposed amendments, as well as many of the technical changes agreed upon by the Council during the negotiations of this instrument.
V osnutku poročila se za zagotovitev soglasja že na prvi obravnavi, pa tudi kot zavezo varovanju interesov upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite pred dodelitvijo statusa rezidenta za daljši čas in po njej, upošteva nekatere pomisleke držav članic.
This draft report reflects the wish to take into account some of the concerns of Member States, with the aim of reaching a first-reading agreement, as well as a commitment to protecting the interests of beneficiaries of international protection before and after acquiring long-term residence status.
Zato to poročilo:
To this end, this report:
– podpira uporabo predloga tako za begunce po Ženevski konvenciji kot za upravičence do nadomestne zaščite,
- Supports the application of the proposal to both Geneva Convention refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection.
– podpira predlog Komisije, da je treba pri izračunu dolžine petih let zakonitega prebivanja upoštevati celotno dolžino postopka,
- Upholds the Commission's proposal that the full duration of the procedure should be taken into account in the calculation of the 5 years period of legal residence.
– razjasni, da je treba pri izračunu obdobja petih let upoštevati vsa druga obdobja zakonitega prebivanja, vključno z obdobjem začasne zaščite pred dodelitvijo mednarodne zaščite,
- Clarifies that any other period of legal residence, including a period of temporary protection before the granting of international protection, should be taken into account in the 5 years calculation.
– ugotavlja, da lahko glede na dejstvo, da nekatere države članice gostijo nesorazmerno veliko upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite, upravičenost teh oseb do statusa rezidenta za daljši čas v skladu s to direktivo znatno poveča pritisk, ki so mu te države izpostavljene, zlasti zaradi svojega zemljepisnega ali demografskega položaja.
- Notes that in view of the fact that some Member States host a disproportionate number of beneficiaries of international protection, the eligibility of such beneficiaries to long-term resident status in accordance with this Directive may have the effect of exacerbating the pressure to which those Member States are subjected, due in particular to their geographical or demographic situation.
Čeprav so za odpravo teh nezaželenih posledic potrebi drugi ukrepi, poročevalec poudarja, da bi bilo treba določbe direktive uporabljati na tak način, da se osebam, ki jim je dodeljena mednarodna zaščita in ki uživajo status rezidenta za daljši čas v tisti državi članici, ki se spopada s takim nesorazmernim pritiskom, olajša uveljavljanje pravice do prebivanja v drugi državi članici in ne zgolj v tisti, ki jim je dodelila mednarodno zaščito.
While other measures are therefore required to address this undesired consequence, your rapporteur stresses that the provisions of this Directive should be applied in such a way as to facilitate the exercise of the right of beneficiaries of international protection who enjoy long-term resident status in a Member State facing such disproportionate pressures, to reside in a Member State other than the one which granted them international protection.
– podpira predlagana varovala pred vračanjem oseb, vključno z dodajanjem opombe v dovoljenje za prebivanje za daljši čas in obveznostjo, da se v primeru morebitnega izgona države članice posvetujejo z državo članico, ki je zaščito dodelila,
- Upholds the proposed safeguards against refoulement, by including a remark in the long-term residence permit and obliging Member States to consult the Member State that granted protection in case of possible expulsion.
– podpira omembo priloge 11 k Ženevski konvenciji in evropskega sporazuma o prenosu odgovornosti,
- Supports references to Schedule 11 of the Geneva Convention and the European Agreement on the Transfer of Responsibility.
– dodatno krepi varovala pred vračanjem oseb – izgon naj bo dovoljen le v državi članici, ki je dodelila mednarodno zaščito,
- Further strengthens the safeguards against refoulement - expulsion should only be permitted to the Member State which granted international protection.
– krepi varovala v primerih prenosov zaščite v drugo državo članico po nacionalnih sporazumih – dovoljenje za prebivanje za daljši čas je treba ustrezno spremeniti,
- Strengthens safeguards in the case of transfer of protection to another Member State under national arrangements - the long-term residence permit needs to be modified accordingly.
– kot dodatno varovalo dodaja posebna sklicevanja na Ženevsko konvencijo.
- Adds specific references to the Geneva Convention in order to guarantee additional safeguards.
S tem predlogom bi bil upravičencem do mednarodne zaščite, ki zakonito prebivajo na ozemlju EU več kot pet let, dodeljen status rezidenta za daljši čas.
- Notes that this proposal intends to give a long-term resident status to beneficiaries of international protection who have been residing legally on the territory of the EU for more than 5 years.
Na ta način bi imeli resnično možnost integracije, kar pomeni, da bi bili sposobni komunicirati v vsaj enem od uradnih jezikov države članice bivanja ter bi postali bolj ozaveščeni o svojih pravicah in dolžnostih ter o temeljnih vrednotah države članice bivanja.
This gives them an opportunity to integrate, which means being able to communicate in one of the official languages of their Member State of residence and to increase their awareness of their rights and obligations as well as the core values of the Member State of residence.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o preprečevanju trgovine z ljudmi in boju proti njej ter zaščiti žrtev, ki razveljavlja Okvirni sklep 2002/629/PNZ
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings, and protecting victims, repealing Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA
(Skupne seje odborov – člen 51 poslovnika)
(Joint Committee meetings - Rule 51)
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI.....................................35
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS.............37
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0095 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0095 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2), člena 82(2) in člena 83(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7–0087/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Articles 82(2) and 83(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0087/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
– ob upoštevanju prispevkov nacionalnih parlamentov k osnutku zakonodajnega akta,
– having regard to the contributions submitted by national parliaments on the draft legislative act,
Mnenje z dne 21.10.2010. ,
Opinion of 21.10.2010. ,
– po posvetovanju z Odborom regij,
– After consulting the Committee of the Regions,
– ob upoštevanju predstavnika Sveta, ki se je zavezal v pismu z dne 25. novembra 2010, da bo odobril stališče Parlamenta v s skladu s členom 294(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 25 November 2010 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju skupne razprave Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov v skladu s členom 51 poslovnika,
– having regard to the joint deliberations of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality pursuant to Rule 51 of the Rules of procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6–0348/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A7‑0348/2010 ),
o preprečevanju trgovine z ljudmi in boju proti njej ter zaščiti žrtev, ki nadomešča Okvirni sklep 2002/629/PNZ
on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings, and protecting victims, replacing Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 82(2) in člena 83(1) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 82(2) and Article 83(1) thereof,
Mnenje z dne 21. oktobra 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu). ,
Opinion of 21 October 2010. ,
(1) Trgovina z ljudmi je hudo kaznivo dejanje, ki je pogosto storjeno v okviru organiziranega kriminala, pomeni hudo kršitev temeljnih pravic in je izrecno prepovedano v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
(1) Trafficking in human beings is a serious crime, often committed within the framework of organised crime, a gross violation of fundamental rights and explicitly prohibited by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Preprečevanje trgovine z ljudmi in boj proti njej je prednostna naloga za Unijo in države članice.
Preventing and combating trafficking in human beings is a priority for the U nion and the Member States .
(1a) Ta direktiva je del celostnega ukrepanja proti trgovini z ljudmi, ki obsega tudi ukrepe, ki vključujejo tretje države, kot je navedeno v dokumentu z naslovom "Dokument o ukrepih za krepitev zunanje razsežnosti Unije pri preprečevanju trgovine z ljudmi: v smeri globalnega ukrepanja EU proti trgovini z ljudmi".
(1a) This Directive is part of global action against trafficking in human beings which includes action involving third countries as stated in the “Action-Oriented Paper on strengthening the U nion external dimension on action against trafficking in human beings; Towards Global EU Action against Trafficking in Human Beings”.
V tem smislu bi bilo treba ukrepe izvajati v tretjih državah, iz katerih žrtve izvirajo ali v katere so bile premeščene, da bi izboljšali ozaveščenost, zmanjšali ranljivost, zagotovili podporo in pomoč žrtvam, obravnavali temeljne vzroke za trgovino z ljudmi in podprli države pri oblikovanju ustrezne zakonodaje na področju boja proti trgovini z ljudmi.
In this context action should be pursued in third countries of origin and transfer of victims, with a view to raising awareness, reducing vulnerability, supporting and assisting victims, fighting the root causes of trafficking and supporting countries in developing appropriate anti-trafficking legislation.
(1b) Ta direktiva upošteva posebnost trgovine z ljudmi, vezano na spol, saj se z ženskami in moškimi pogosto trguje za različne namene.
(1b) This Directive recognises the gender-specific phenomenon of trafficking and that women and men are often trafficked for different purposes.
Tudi v ukrepih za pomoč in podporo bi zato morali ustrezno upoštevati to posebnost, vezano na spol.
For this reason, assistance and support measures should also be gender specific where appropriate .
Spodbujevalni in zaviralni dejavniki se lahko razlikujejo glede na zadevne sektorje, kot je trgovina z ljudmi za spolno industrijo ali za izkoriščanje delovne sile na primer na gradbiščih, v kmetijstvu ali za služabništvo.
The "push" and "pull" factors may be different depending on the sectors concerned, such as trafficking in human beings into the sex industry or for labour exploitation in, for example, construction work, the agricultural sector or domestic servitude.
(2) Evropska unija je zavezana preprečevanju trgovine z ljudmi in boju proti njej ter varstvu pravic žrtev trgovine z ljudmi.
(2) The European Union is committed to the prevention of and fight against trafficking in human beings, and to the protection of the rights of trafficked persons.
V ta namen sta bila sprejeta Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/629/PNZ z dne 19. julija 2002 o boju proti trgovanju z ljudmi
For this purpose, Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings
1. in Načrt EU o najboljših praksah, standardih in postopkih za preprečevanje in boj proti trgovini z ljudmi (2005/C 311/01)
1. , and an EU Plan on best practices, standards and procedures for combating and preventing trafficking in human beings