natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ocena, ali tehnološki in tržni pogoji omogočajo prenos številk med omrežji, ki zagotavljajo storitve na fiksni lokaciji, in mobilnimi omrežji, mora zlasti upoštevati cene za uporabnike in stroške prehoda za podjetja, ki zagotavljajo storitve na fiksni lokaciji, in mobilna omrežja.
Assessment of whether technology and market conditions are such as to allow for porting of numbers between networks providing services at a fixed location and mobile networks should in particular take into account prices for users and switching costs for undertakings providing services at fixed locations and mobile networks.
Prenosljivost številk bistveno olajšuje izbiro potrošnikov in učinkovito konkurenco na konkurenčnih trgih elektronskih komunikacij in jo je treba čim prej uvesti, praviloma ne več kot v enem dnevu po zahtevi potrošnika .
Number portability is a key facilitator of consumer choice and effective competition in competitive markets for electronic communications, and should be implemented with the minimum of delay , ordinarily within no more than one day from the request of the consumer .
Vendar so izkušnje v nekaterih državah članicah pokazale obstoj tveganja, da se potrošniku brez njegove privolitve zamenja ponudnika.
However, experience in certain Member States has shown that there is a risk of consumers being switched without consent.
Te primere morajo obravnavati predvsem organi kazenskega pregona, kljub temu pa morajo imeti države članice možnost, da uveljavijo najmanjše sorazmerne ukrepe glede procesa zamenjave ponudnika, saj so ti potrebni za zmanjševanje takih tveganj, ne da bi s tem postal proces za potrošnike manj zanimiv.
While that is a matter that should primarily be addressed by law-enforcement authorities, Member States should be able to impose such minimum proportionate measures regarding the switching process as are necessary to minimise such risks, without making the process less attractive for consumers.
Navajanje razlage in smernic glede sprememb člena 30(4).
To provide background and guidance on the changes to 30(4).
(24) Televizijsko oddajanje je linearna avdiovizualna medijska storitev, kot je opredeljeno v Direktivi o avdiovizulanih medijskih storitvah Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne […] 2007, ki ga ponuja ponudnik medijske storitve za sočasno gledanje programov na podlagi programskega sporeda; ponudnik medijske storitve lahko ponuja več avdio ali avdiovizualnih programskih sporedov (kanalov).
(24) A television broadcast is a linear audiovisual media service as defined in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of [….] 2007, which is provided by a media service provider for simultaneous viewing of programmes on the basis of a programme schedule; a media service provider may provide a number of audio or audio visual programme schedules (channels).
Lahko se uporablja zakonska obveznost „prenosa“ , vendar samo za določene radiodifuzijske kanale , ki jih zagotavlja določen ponudnik medijskih storitev.
Legal “must-carry” obligations may be applied , but only to specified broadcast channels supplied by a specified media service provider.
Države članice bi morale v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji zagotoviti jasno utemeljitev obveznosti „prenosa“ za zagotovitev, da so take obveznosti pregledne, sorazmerne in pravilno opredeljene.
Member States should provide a clear justification for the “must carry” obligations in their national law so as to ensure that such obligations are transparent, proportionate and properly defined.
S tem v zvezi bi morala biti pravila „obveznosti prenosa“ zasnovana tako, da zagotavljajo zadostne spodbude za učinkovite naložbe v infrastrukturo.
In that regard, “must carry” rules should be designed in a way which provides sufficient incentives for efficient investment in infrastructure.
Pravila „obveznosti prenosa“ bi bilo treba redno pregledovati, da se uskladijo s tehnološkim in tržnim razvojem, s čemer se zagotovi, da so še naprej sorazmerna s cilji, ki jih je treba doseči.
“Must carry” rules should be periodically reviewed in order to keep them up-to-date with technological and market evolution in order to ensure that they continue to be proportionate to the objectives to be achieved.
Zaradi hitrih sprememb tehnoloških in tržnih pogojev bi bilo treba tak celoten pregled opraviti najmanj vsaka tri leta, potrebno pa bi bilo tudi javno posvetovanje z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi.
Given the rapid change in technology and market conditions such a full review would need to be carried out at least every three years and would require a public consultation of all stakeholders.
Enega ali več radiodifuzijskih kanalov je mogoče dopolniti s storitvami, ki izboljšujejo dostopnost za uporabnike s posebnimi potrebami, kot so videotekst, podnaslavljanje, tonski zapis in znakovni jezik.
One or more broadcast channels may be complemented by services to improve accessibility for users with disabilities, such as a videotext service, subtitling service, an audio description or sign language.
(24) Lahko se uporablja zakonska obveznost „prenosa“ za določene radijske in avdiovizualne medijske storitve in dopolnilne storitve , ki jih zagotavlja določen ponudnik medijskih storitev.
(24) Legal “must-carry” obligations may be applied to specified radio and audiovisual media services and complementary services supplied by a specified media service provider.
Avdiovizualne medijske storitve so opredeljene v Direktivi 2007/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2007 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 89/552/EGS o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov 1 .
Audiovisual media services are defined in Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities 1 .
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti jasno utemeljitev obveznosti „prenosa“ za zagotovitev, da so take obveznosti pregledne, sorazmerne in pravilno opredeljene.
Member States should provide a clear justification for the “must carry” obligations so as to ensure that such obligations are transparent, proportionate and properly defined.
Dopolnilne storitve vključujejo, a niso omejene na storitve , ki izboljšujejo dostopnost za uporabnike s posebnimi potrebami, kot so videotekst, podnaslavljanje, tonski zapis in znakovni jezik.
Complementary services include, but are not limited to, services to improve accessibility for users with disabilities, such as a videotext service, subtitling service, an audio description or sign language.
1 UL L 332, 18.12.2007, str.
1 OJ L 332, 18.12.2007, p.
(25a) Postopek za izvensodno reševanje sporov bi morali okrepiti, in sicer tako, da se zagotovi uporaba neodvisnih organov za reševanje sporov ter vsaj minimalna usklajenost tega postopka z načeli iz priporočila Komisije 98/257/ES z dne 30. marca 1998 o načelih, ki se uporabljajo za organe, pristojne za izvensodno poravnavo potrošniških sporov 1 .
(25a) The procedure for out-of-court dispute resolution should be strengthened by ensuring that independent dispute resolution bodies are used, and that the procedure conforms at least to the minimum principles established by Commission Recommendation 98/257/EC of 30 March 1998 on the principles applicable to the bodies responsible for out-of-court settlement of consumer disputes 1 .
Države članice lahko v ta namen uporabljajo že obstoječe organe za reševanje sporov, če ti izpolnjujejo veljavne zahteve, ali pa ustanovijo nove organe.
Member States may either use existing dispute resolution bodies for that purpose, provided those bodies meet the applicable requirements, or establish new bodies.
Glej obrazložitev k členu 34(1).
See justification to 34(1).
(26a) Direktiva 2002/58/ES omogoča usklajevanje predpisov držav članic, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev enake ravni zaščite temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, zlasti pravice do zasebnosti ter pravice do zaupnosti in varnosti sistemov informacijske tehnologije pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov na področju elektronskih komunikacij, ter za zagotovitev prostega pretoka takšnih podatkov ter elektronske komunikacijske opreme in storitev v Skupnosti.
(26a) Directive 2002/58/EC provides for the harmonisation of the provisions of the Member States required to ensure an equivalent level of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, and in particular the right to privacy and the right to confidentiality and security of information technology systems, with respect to the processing of personal data in the electronic communication s sector , and to ensure the free movement of such data and of electronic communication s equipment and services in the Community.
(Predlog spremembe 1 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 1 of the LIBE opinion)
(26b) Komisija naj se pri opredeljevanju izvedbenih ukrepov za varnost obdelave v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom posvetovala z vsemi ustreznimi evropskimi organi in organizacijami (ENISA, Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov in delovna skupina iz člena 29) ter vsemi ostalimi zadevnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi zlasti zato, da bi bila obveščena o najboljših razpoložljivih tehničnih in gospodarskih metodah za izboljšanje izvajanja Direktive 2002/58/ES.
(26b) When defining the implementing measures on the security of processing, in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, the Commission sh ould consult all relevant European authorities and organisations (ENISA, the E uropean D ata P rotection S upervisor and the Article 29 Working Party) as well as all other relevant stakeholders, particularly in order to be informed of the best available technical and economic methods for improving the implementation of Directive 2002/58/EC .
(Predlog spremembe 2 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 2 of the LIBE opinion)
Uvodna izjava 26 c (novo)
Recital 26 c (new)
(26c) Določbe Direktive 2002/58/ES podrobno opredeljujejo in dopolnjujejo Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov 1 , in ščitijo zakonite interese naročnikov, ki so fizične ali pravne osebe.
(26c) The provisions of Directive 2002/58/EC particularise and complement Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data 1 and provide for the legitimate interests of subscribers who are natural or legal persons.
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1882/2003.
Directive as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003.
(Predlog spremembe 3 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 3 of the LIBE opinion)
(27) Zaradi liberalizacije trgov elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev ter hitrega tehnološkega razvoja se je povečala konkurenca in gospodarska rast, kar je povzročilo veliko raznolikost storitev za končne uporabnike, ki so dostopne prek javnih elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij.
(27) Liberalisation of electronic communications networks and services markets and rapid technological development have combined to boost competition and economic growth and resulted in a rich diversity of end-user services accessible via public electronic communications networks.
Treba je zagotoviti, da potrošniki in uporabniki ne glede na tehnologijo, ki se uporablja za zagotavljanje določene storitve, uživajo enako raven varstva zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov.
There is a need to ensure that consumers and users are afforded the same level of protection of privacy and personal data, regardless of the technology used to deliver a particular service.
(27) Zaradi liberalizacije trgov elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev ter hitrega tehnološkega razvoja se je povečala konkurenca in gospodarska rast, kar je povzročilo veliko raznolikost storitev za končne uporabnike, ki so dostopne prek javnih in zasebnih elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ter javno dostopnih zasebnih omrežij .
(27) Liberalisation of electronic communications networks and services markets and rapid technological development have combined to boost competition and economic growth and have resulted in a rich diversity of end-user services accessible via public and private electronic communications networks and publicly accessible private networks .
(Predlog spremembe 4 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 4 of the LIBE opinion)
(28a) Za namene Direktive 2002/58/ES se naslovi internetnega protokola (IP) obravnavajo kot osebni podatki samo, če jih je mogoče kot take ali v povezavi z drugimi podatki neposredno povezati s posameznikom.
(28a) For the purpose of Directive 2002/58/EC , Internet Protocol addresses sh ould be considered as personal data only if they can be d irectly linked to an individual alone or in conjunction with other data.
Komisija do… + v okviru varstva podatkov po posvetovanju z delovno skupino iz člena 29 in evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov predlagala posebno zakonodajo o zakonitem ravnanju z naslovi IP kot osebnimi podatki.
By ... + , the Commission should propose specific legislation on the legal handling of Internet Protocol addresses as personal data within the framework of data protection following consultation of the Article 29 Working Party and the European Data Protection Supervisor .
+ Dve leti po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive .
+ Two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
(Predlog spremembe 5 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 5 of the LIBE opinion)
(28b) Ponudnik javno dostopne elektronske komunikacijske storitve mora sprejeti ustrezne tehnične in organizacijske ukrepe, da bi zagotovil varnost svojih storitev.
(28b) The provider of a publicly available electronic communications service should take appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the security of its services.
Brez poseganja v Direktivo 95/46/ES in Direktivo 2006/24/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o hrambi podatkov, pridobljenih ali obdelanih v zvezi z zagotavljanjem javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ali javnih komunikacijskih omrežij 1 , naj bi ti ukrepi zagotovili, da bodo do osebnih podatkov lahko dostopali le pooblaščeni uslužbenci za zakonite in odobrene namene ter da bodo shranjeni ali poslani osebni podatki kot tudi omrežja in storitve zaščiteni.
Without prejudice to Directive 95/46/EC and Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks 1 , such measures should ensure that personal data can be accessed only by authorised personnel for legally authorised purposes and that the personal data stored or transmitted as well as the network and services are protected.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba za prepoznavanje ranljivosti v sistemu oblikovati varnostno politiko za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, in izvajati redno spremljanje ter sprejemati preventivne, korektivne in blažilne ukrepe.
Moreover , a security policy with respect to the processing of personal data should be established in order to identify vulnerabilities in the system and regular monitoring and preventive, corrective and mitigating action should be carried out.
1 UL L 105, 13.4.2006, str.
1 OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p.
(Predlog spremembe 6 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 6 of the LIBE opinion)
Uvodna izjava 28 c (novo)
Recital 28 c (new)
(28c) Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo spremljati sprejete ukrepe in razširjati najboljše prakse med ponudniki javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
(28c) National regulatory authorities should monitor measures taken and disseminate best practices among providers of publicly available electronic communications services.
(Predlog spremembe 7 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 7 of the LIBE opinion)
(29) Kršitev varnosti, ki povzroči izgubo ali drugačno ogroženost osebnih podatkov posameznega naročnika, lahko, če se ne obravnava ustrezno in pravočasno, povzroči veliko gospodarsko izgubo in družbeno škodo, vključno z lažnim prikazovanjem identitete.
(29) A breach of security resulting in the loss or compromising personal data of an individual subscriber may, if not addressed in an adequate and timely manner, result in substantial economic loss and social harm, including identity fraud.
Zato je treba naročnike, na katere vplivajo taki varnostni incidenti, takoj obvestiti , da lahko sprejmejo ustrezne previdnostne ukrepe .
Therefore, subscribers concerned by such security incidents should be notified without delay and informed in order to be able to take the necessary precautions .
Obvestilo naj vsebuje informacije o ukrepih, ki jih je za obravnavanje kršitve sprejel ponudnik, ter priporočila za prizadete uporabnike.
The notification should include information about measures taken by the provider to address the breach, as well as recommendations for the users affected.
Zato je treba takoj obvestiti nacionalni regulativni organ ali drug pristojni nacionalni organ .
Therefore, the national regulatory authority or other competent national authority should be notified without delay.
Pristojni organ obravnava kršitve in določi njihovo resnost.
The competent authority sh ould consider and determine the seriousness of the breach.
V primeru hude kršitve od ponudnika javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev in ponudnika storitev informacijske družbe zahteva, da nemudoma ustrezno obvestita osebe, na katere kršitev vpliva.
If the breach is deemed to be serious the competent authority sh ould require the provider of publicly available electronic communications service and the provider of information society services to give an appropriate notification without undue delay to the persons affected by the breach.
(Predlog spremembe 8 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 8 of the LIBE opinion)
(30a) Člen 15(1) Direktive 2002/58/ES se upošteva tako, da razkritje osebnih podatkov v smislu člena 8 Direktive 2004/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine 1 ne posega v Direktivo 2002/58/ES ali Direktivo 95/46/ES, kadar poteka na osnovi utemeljene, tj. zadostno obrazložene, in sorazmerne zahteve v skladu s postopki, ki jih določijo države članice za zagotavljanje spoštovanja teh ukrepov.
(30a) Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC should be construed as meaning that disclosure of personal data in the context of Article 8 of Directive 2004/48 /EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights 1 is without prejudice to Directive 2002/58/EC or Directive 95/46 /EC where it takes place following a justified, i.e. sufficiently well-founded, and proportionate request in accordance with procedures laid down by the Member States to guarantee that these safeguards are respected.
1 UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str.
1 OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p.
(Predlog spremembe 9 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 9 of the LIBE opinion)
Člen 8 Direktive 2004/48 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine se nanaša na razkritje informacij, med katerimi so lahko podatki, zaščiteni s to direktivo (2002/58) in/ali Direktivo 95/46/ES.
Article 8, Directive 2004/48 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights relates to disclosure of information, which may involve data protected under this Directive (2002/58) and/or Directive 95/46/EC.
V členu 15(1) te direktive in členu 13(1)(g) Direktive 95/46/ES je jasno navedeno, da lahko pride do razkritja, ker je treba zaščititi pravice in svoboščine tretjih strank.
It is clear from Article 15(1) of this Directive and Article 13(1)(g) of Directive 95/46/EC that such disclosure may take place, as it is necessary to protect the rights and freedoms of third parties.
Glede na sodno prakso v zadnjem času se zdi primerno, da bi na ravni Evropske unije pojasnili razmerje med posebno določbo o razkritju iz člena 8 Direktive 2004/48 ter določbami te direktive, saj bi s tem povečali pravno varnost za vse stranke.
In view of recent case-law it seems relevant to clarify at EU-level the relationship between the specific disclosure provision in Article 8 of Directive 2004/48 and the provisions of this Directive, and thereby increase legal certainty for all parties.
(30b) Pri izvajanju ukrepov za prenos Direktive 2002/58/ES bi morali organi in sodišča držav članic nacionalno pravo interpretirati skladno s to direktivo ter zagotoviti, da ne bodo uporabili interpretacije te direktive, ki bi bila v nasprotju z drugimi temeljnimi pravicami ali splošnimi načeli prava Skupnosti, na primer z načelom sorazmernosti.
(30b) When implementing measures transposing Directive 2002/58/EC, the authorities and courts of the Member States sh ould not only interpret their national law in a manner consistent with that Directive , but should also en sure that they do not rely on an interpretation of that Directive which would be in conflict with other fundamental rights or general principles of Community law, such as the principle of proportionality.
(Predlog spremembe 10 iz mnenja Odbora LIBE.)
(AM 10 of the LIBE opinion)
V predlogu spremembe je upoštevana sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 29. januarja 2008 v zadevi Promusicae proti Telefónica, s katero je bilo potrjeno, da morajo države članice razlagati direktivo v skladu z drugimi temeljnimi pravicami ali splošnimi pravnimi načeli.
This amendment takes account of the Court of Justice judgment of 29 January 2008 in the Promusicae v Telefónica case, which reaffirms that Member States must interpret the directive in a manner that does not conflict with other fundamental rights or general principles of law.
To je jamstvo za varstvo pravic in svoboščin drugih.
This constitutes a guarantee for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
(33) Organ lahko prispeva k višji ravni varstva osebnih podatkov in zasebnosti v Skupnosti, med drugim s strokovnim znanjem in izkušnjami ter nasveti, spodbujanjem izmenjave najboljših praks pri obvladovanju tveganja in vzpostavitvijo skupnih metodologij za oceno tveganja.
(33) The Authority can contribute to the enhanced level of protection for personal data and privacy in the Community by, among other things, providing expertise and advice, promoting the exchange of best practices in risk management, and establishing common methodologies for risk assessment.
Zlasti mora prispevati k uskladitvi ustreznih tehničnih in organizacijskih varnostnih ukrepov.
In particular, it should contribute to harmonisation of appropriate technical and organisational security measures.
Predlagani organ verjetno ne bo pristojen za ta vprašanja.
The proposed authority will likely not have responsibility for these issues.
(34) Programska oprema, ki prikrito spremlja dejanja uporabnika in/ali uničuje uporabnikovo terminalsko opremo v korist tretje stranke (tako imenovana „vohunska programska oprema“), lahko resno ogroža zasebnost uporabnikov.
(34) Software that surreptitiously monitors actions of the user and/or subverts operation of the user’s terminal equipment for the benefit of a third party (so-called “spyware”) poses a serious threat to users’ privacy.
Treba je zagotoviti visoko in enako raven varstva zasebnosti uporabnikov, ne glede na to ali so nezaželeni vohunski programi preneseni sami od sebe prek elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, ali pa se dostavijo in namestijo skriti v programski opremi, ki se nahaja na drugih zunanjih nosilcih shranjevanja podatkov, kot so zgoščenke, CD-ROMi, USB ključi.
A high and equal level of protection of the private sphere of users needs to be ensured, regardless of whether unwanted spying programmes are inadvertently downloaded via electronic communications networks or are delivered and installed hidden in software distributed on other external data storage media, such as CDs, CD-ROMs, USB keys.