natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalec meni, da morajo biti tudi pomembnejša vprašanja, kot so pogostejše izdajanje vizumov z rokom veljavnosti več let, potreba po uporabi biometričnih podatkov in celo pomembno zmanjšanje taks, možne teme sporazumov o poenostavitvi vizumskega postopka.
The rapporteur believes that also major issues such as greater frequency of visas issued with a period of validity of several years, whether biometric data must be implemented or not and even meaningful reductions in fees must be possible subjects for visa simplification agreements.
Poleg tega je pomembno, da tudi Evropski parlament sodeluje pri določitvi pogajalskega mandata za takšne sporazume in pri poteku pogajanj.
Moreover, it is important that the European Parliament too should be involved in the framing of negotiating mandates for such agreements and in the conduct of negotiations.
Prav tako je moteče, da veliko mladih iz držav, ki mejijo na EU, ni bilo nikoli v tujini.
It is also disturbing that many young people bordering on the EU have never been abroad even once.
Unija ne sme osamiti teh ljudi.
The Union has a responsibility not to isolate these people.
V nasprotnem primeru se lahko pojavijo nacionalistična in radikalna nagnjenja.
Otherwise nationalist and radical tendencies can take root.
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odpadkih
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste and repealing certain Directives
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (11406//4/2007 – C6‑0000/2008),
– having regard to the Council common position (11406/4/2007 – C6‑0056/2008 ),
UL C 287, 29.11.2007, str.
OJ C 287 E, 29.11.2007, p.
136. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0667 ),
136. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0667 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane (A6‑0000/2008),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0162/2008 ),
(1) Direktiva 2006/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2006 o odpadkih določa zakonodajni okvir za ravnanje z odpadki v Skupnosti.
(1) Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste establishes the legislative framework for the handling of waste in the Community.
Opredeljuje ključne pojme, kot so odpadek, predelava in odstranjevanje, in vzpostavlja temeljne zahteve za ravnanje z odpadki, zlasti obveznost za zavod ali podjetje, ki izvajata postopke ravnanja z odpadki, da mora imeti dovoljenje oziroma se mora registrirati, in obveznost za države članice, da morajo izdelati načrte ravnanja z odpadki.
It defines key concepts such as waste, recovery and disposal and puts in place the essential requirements for the management of waste, notably an obligation for an establishment or undertaking carrying out waste management operations to have a permit or to be registered and an obligation for the Member States to draw up waste management plans.
Poleg tega vzpostavlja glavna načela, kot je obveznost ravnanja z odpadki brez negativnega vpliva na okolje in zdravje ljudi, spodbujanje upoštevanja hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki ter načelo onesnaževalec plača, v skladu s katerim mora stroške odstranjevanja odpadkov kriti imetnik odpadkov ali prejšnji imetniki ali proizvajalci proizvodov, od katerih odpadki izvirajo.
It also establishes major principles such as an obligation to handle waste in a way that does not have a negative impact on the environment and human health, an encouragement to apply the waste hierarchy and, in accordance with the polluter-pays principle, a requirement that the costs of disposing of waste must be borne by the holder of waste, by previous holders or by the producers of the product from which the waste came.
Poleg tega vzpostavlja glavna načela, kot je obveznost ravnanja z odpadki brez negativnega vpliva na okolje in zdravje ljudi, hierarhija ravnanja z odpadki ter načelo onesnaževalec plača, v skladu s katerim mora stroške odstranjevanja odpadkov kriti imetnik odpadkov ali prejšnji imetniki ali proizvajalci proizvodov, od katerih odpadki izvirajo.
It also establishes major principles such as an obligation to handle waste in a way that does not have a negative impact on the environment and human health, the waste hierarchy and, in accordance with the polluter-pays principle, a requirement that the costs of disposing of waste must be borne by the holder of waste, by previous holders or by the producers of the product from which the waste came.
(Nov predlog spremembe, ki temelji na členu 62(2)(c) Poslovnika)
(New amendment based on Rule 62(2)(c) of the Rules of Procedure)
Dopolnjuje predlog spremembe 21 tega poročevalca, ki obravnava hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki kot splošno pravilo.
Complementary to amendment 21 by the rapporteur which establishes the waste hierarchy as a general rule.
Zato direktiva več kot le "spodbuja" države članice, naj to hierarhijo upoštevajo.
Consequently, the directive does not just "encourage" Member States to apply the waste hierarchy.
(1a) Poglavitni cilj politike ravnanja z odpadki mora biti zmanjšati škodljive vplive nastajanja in ravnanja z odpadki na zdravje ljudi in okolje.
(1a) The first objective of any waste policy should be to minimise the negative effects of the generation and management of waste on human health and the environment.
Predlog spremembe, ki ga je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi (predlog spremembe 1).
Amendment adopted by Parliament at the first reading (amendment 1).
V idealnem primeru bi morala biti to prva uvodna izjava, saj omogoča koristen pregled nad po mnenju Parlamenta ključnimi cilji EU na področju ravnanja z odpadki.
Ideally, this should come first in the list of recitals since it gives a useful overview of what the Parliament considers to be the EU's key objectives in waste management.
(1b) Svet je v svoji resoluciji z dne 24. februarja 1997 o strategiji Skupnosti za ravnanje z odpadki 1 potrdil, da bi moralo biti preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov najpomembnejša prednostna naloga pri ravnanju z odpadki ter da bi bilo treba ponovni uporabi in recikliranju materialov dati prednost pred pridobivanjem energije iz odpadkov, kjer in kolikor sta to najboljši ekološki možnosti.
(1b) In its Resolution of 24 February 1997 on a Community strategy for waste management 1 , the Council confirmed that waste prevention should be the first priority of waste management, and that re-use and material recycling should be preferred to energy recovery of waste, where and insofar as they are the best ecological options.
Predlog spremembe, o katerem se je Parlament dogovoril v prvi obravnavi (predlog spremembe 1).
Amendment agreed by Parliament at first reading (amendment 1).
Pomembno je, da se vključi sklicevanje na zgodovino hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki, saj bo tako v uvodni izjavi zajeto celotno ozadje tega predloga.
It is important to include this reference to the history of the waste hierarchy in order that the recital may give a complete background to this proposal .
(2) Sklep št. 1600/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 o šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti poziva k pripravi ali reviziji zakonodaje o odpadkih, vključno s pojasnitvijo razlike med odpadki in neodpadki ter oblikovanju ukrepov za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov.
(2) Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme calls for the development or revision of the legislation on waste, including a clarification of the distinction between waste and non-waste, and for the development of measures regarding waste prevention.
(2) Sklep št. 1600/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 o šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti poziva k pripravi ali reviziji zakonodaje o odpadkih, vključno s pojasnitvijo razlike med odpadki in neodpadki , ter k oblikovanju ukrepov za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov , vključno z določanjem ciljev .
(2) Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme calls for the development or revision of the legislation on waste, including a clarification of the distinction between waste and non-waste, and for the development of measures regarding waste prevention, including the setting of targets.
Zaradi celovitosti je v uvodnih izjavah potrebno sklicevanje na vključitev ciljev s strani Parlamenta.
A reference to the Parliament's inclusion of targets is needed in the recitals to for the sake of completeness.
(8) Za premičnine , ki jih imetnik zavrže ali namerava ali mora zavreči, bi bilo treba ob upoštevanju nekaterih izjem uporabiti učinkovita in dosledna pravila o obdelavi odpadkov.
(8) Effective and consistent rules on waste treatment should be applied, subject to certain exceptions, to movable property which the holder discards or intends or is required to discard.
(8) Za premične snovi in predmete , ki jih imetnik zavrže ali namerava ali mora zavreči, bi bilo treba ob upoštevanju nekaterih izjem uporabiti učinkovita in dosledna pravila o obdelavi odpadkov.
(8) Effective and consistent rules on waste treatment should be applied, subject to certain exceptions, to movable substances and objects which the holder discards or intends or is required to discard.
Izraz premičnine bi bil lahko zavajajoč, ker bi lahko navajal na to, da pravila veljajo samo za odpadke, ki so v lasti osebe, ki jih zavrže.
The term "property" is potentially misleading, as it seems to suggest that rules only apply to waste that belong to the person discarding it.
Vendar ker je možno, da kdo zavrže nekaj, kar ni v njeni/njegovi lasti, je treba izraz premičnine zamenjati z izrazi, ki se uporabljajo pri opredelitvi odpadkov.
However, as it is quite possible that someone might discard something s/he does not own, the term "property" should be replaced with the terms used in the definition of "waste".
(12) Uvrstitev odpadkov med nevarne odpadke bi morala med drugim temeljiti na zakonodaji Skupnosti o kemikalijah, zlasti glede uvrstitve pripravkov med nevarne, vključno z v ta namen uporabljenimi koncentracijskimi mejnimi vrednostmi.
(12) The classification of waste as hazardous waste should be based, inter-alia, on the Community legislation on chemicals, in particular concerning the classification of preparations as hazardous, including concentration limit values used for that purpose.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba ohraniti sistem, s katerim so bili odpadki in nevarni odpadki uvrščeni v skladu s seznamom odpadkov, kakor je bil nazadnje oblikovan z Odločbo Komisije 2000/532/ES, da bi se spodbudila usklajena uvrstitev odpadkov in zagotovila usklajena določitev nevarnih odpadkov v Skupnosti.
Furthermore, it is necessary to maintain the system by which waste and hazardous waste have been classified in accordance with the list of the types of waste as last established by Commission Decision 2000/532/EC, in order to encourage a harmonised classification of waste and ensure the harmonised determination of hazardous waste within the Community.
(12) Nevarni odpadki se razvrščajo po merilih nevarnosti in tveganja.
(12) Hazardous wastes are qualified by hazard and risk crite ria .
Zato morajo zanje veljati stroge specifikacije, da se preprečijo ali čim bolj zavrejo škodljivi vplivi, ki so posledica neustreznega ravnanja in lahko vplivajo na okolje, ter povzročijo nevarnost za zdravje in varnost ljudi.
As a result, they need to be regulated under strict specifications in order to prevent or limit, as far as possible, negative effects due to inapprop ria te management which may affect the environment and give rise to risks to human health and safety.
Z nevarnimi odpadki je treba zaradi njihovih nevarnih lastnosti ustrezno ravnati, kar vključuje posebne in prilagojene tehnike zbiranja in obdelave, poseben nadzor in posebne postopke v zvezi z njihovo sledljivostjo.
Because of their hazardous properties, hazardous wastes need an approp ria te management which involves specific and adapted collection and treatment techniques, particular controls and dedicated waste traceability modalities.
Vsi izvajalci postopkov z nevarnimi odpadki morajo imeti ustrezne kvalifikacije in biti ustrezno usposobljeni.
All hazardous waste operators need to have adequate qualifications and training.
(Predlog spremembe 11, sprejet v prvi obravnavi)
(Amendment 11 adopted at First Reading)
Ker bo okvirna direktiva o vodah razveljavila direktivo o nevarnih odpadkih, je bistvenega pomena, da se zagotovi ustrezno upoštevanje sektorja upravljanja z nevarnimi odpadki v njenem besedilu.
As the WFD will repeal the Hazardous Waste Directive, it is particularly important to ensure that the hazardous waste management sector is adequately taken into account in the text of the Directive.
(17) Opredelitvi predelave in odstranjevanja je treba spremeniti, da bi se zagotovilo jasno razlikovanje med obema pojmoma, ki bi temeljilo na dejanskem razlikovanju med vplivi na okolje z nadomestitvijo naravnih virov v gospodarstvu in priznavanjem, da ima uporaba odpadkov kot vira potencialne koristi za okolje in zdravje ljudi.
(17) The definitions of recovery and disposal need to be modified in order to ensure a clear distinction between the two concepts, based on a genuine difference in environmental impact through the substitution of natural resources in the economy and recognising the potential benefits to the environment and human health of using waste as a resource.
Poleg tega se lahko oblikujejo smernice za pojasnitev primerov, v katerih je to razlikovanje težko uporabiti v praksi ali v katerih uvrstitev dejavnosti med predelavo ne ustreza dejanskim okoljskim vplivom postopka.
In addition, guidelines may be developed in order to clarify cases where this distinction is difficult to apply in practice or where the classification of the activity as recovery does not match the real environmental impact of the operation.
Poleg tega je treba oblikovati merila za pojasnitev primerov, v katerih je to razlikovanje težko uporabiti v praksi ali v katerih uvrstitev dejavnosti med predelavo ne ustreza dejanskim okoljskim vplivom postopka.
In addition, crite ria should be developed in order to clarify cases where this distinction is difficult to apply in practice or where the classification of the activity as recovery does not match the real environmental impact of the operation.
(Nov predlog spremembe, ki temelji na členu 62(2)(c) poslovnika in je v skladu s predlogom spremembe 38/108/157/140/141 iz prve obravnave)
(New amendment based on Rule 62(2)(c) of the Rules of Procedure, and in line with amendment 38/108/157/140/141 from first reading)
Povezuje se z novim predlogom spremembe k členu 8(2) istih avtorjev.
Linked to new amendment to Article 8(2) by the same authors.
V primeru, da se v tej direktivi določijo merila učinkovitosti za sežig odpadkov, je treba narediti isto za druge dejavnosti predelave, in s tem bolje ločiti med dejavnostmi resnične in lažne predelave.
In case efficiency criteria are set for waste incineration in this directive, the same should be done for other recovery operations to better distinguish true recovery operations from sham recovery operations.
Ker bi bila ta merila bistvena, jih je treba opredeliti s soodločanjem.
As such criteria would be essential elements, they should be set in co-decision.
(20) Različni vidiki opredelitve odpadka se med seboj ne bi smeli zamenjevati, hkrati pa bi bilo po potrebi treba uporabiti ustrezne postopke , na eni strani za stranske proizvode, ki niso odpadki, na drugi pa za odpadke, ki prenehajo biti odpadki.
(20) There should be no confusion between the various aspects of the waste definition, and appropriate procedures should be applied, where necessary, to by-products that are not waste, on the one hand, or to waste that ceases to be waste, on the other hand .
Za razjasnitev nekaterih vidikov opredelitve odpadka bi bilo treba v tej direktivi pojasniti :
In order to specify certain aspects of the definition of waste, this Directive should clarify :
(20) Različni vidiki opredelitve odpadka se med seboj ne bi smeli zamenjevati, hkrati pa bi bilo treba uporabiti ustrezne postopke za odpadke, ki prenehajo biti odpadki.
(20) There should be no confusion between the various aspects of the waste definition, and appropriate procedures should be applied to waste that ceases to be waste.
Za razjasnitev nekaterih vidikov opredelitve odpadka bi bilo treba v tej direktivi pojasniti , kdaj določen odpadek preneha biti odpadek, in sicer z določitvijo meril za prenehanje statusa odpadka, ki zagotavlja visoko raven varstva okolja ter koristi okolju in gospodarstvu; možne kategorije odpadkov, za katere bi bilo treba oblikovati specifikacije in merila za prenehanje statusa odpadka, med drugim predstavljajo gradbeni odpadki in odpadki pri rušenju objektov, nekateri pepeli in žlindre, odpadne kovine, kompost, odpadni papir in steklo.
In order to specify certain aspects of the definition of waste, this Directive should clarify when certain waste ceases to be waste, laying down end-of-waste criteria that provide a high level of environmental protection and an environmental and economic benefit; possible categories of waste for which "end-of-waste" specifications and criteria should be developed are, among others, construction and demolition waste, some ashes and slags, scrap metals, compost, waste paper and glass.
Koncept odpadka, ki preneha biti odpadek, se ne sme uporabljati pri čezmejnih pošiljkah odpadkov v tretje države.
The concept of waste that ceases to be waste should not apply for the purpose of trans-boundary shipments to third countries.
– kdaj so snovi ali predmeti, ki nastanejo pri proizvodnem procesu, katerega glavni namen ni proizvodnja takšnih snovi ali predmetov, stranski proizvodi in ne odpadki.
– when substances or objects resulting from a production process not primarily aimed at producing such substances or objects are by-products and not waste.
Odločitev, da neka snov ni odpadek, se lahko sprejme le na podlagi usklajenega pristopa, ki se redno posodablja, in kadar je to skladno z varstvom okolja in zdravja ljudi.
The decision that a substance is not waste can be taken only on the basis of a coordinated approach, to be regularly updated, and where this is consistent with the protection of the environment and human health.
Če je uporaba stranskega proizvoda dovoljena z okoljskim dovoljenjem ali splošnimi okoljskimi predpisi, lahko države članice na podlagi tega določijo, da splošni škodljivi vplivi na okolje in zdravje ljudi niso pričakovani, in
If the use of a by-product is allowed under an environmental licence or general environmental rules, this can be used by Member States as a tool to decide that no overall adverse environmental or human health impacts are expected to occur, and
– kdaj določen odpadek preneha biti odpadek, in sicer z določitvijo meril za prenehanje statusa odpadka, ki zagotavlja visoko raven varstva okolja ter koristi okolju in gospodarstvu; možne kategorije odpadkov, za katere bi bilo treba oblikovati specifikacije in merila za prenehanje statusa odpadka, med drugim predstavljajo gradbeni odpadki in odpadki pri rušenju objektov, nekateri pepeli in žlindre, odpadne kovine, kompost, odpadni papir in steklo.
– when certain waste ceases to be waste, laying down end-of-waste criteria that provide a high level of environmental protection and an environmental and economic benefit; possible categories of waste for which "end-of-waste" specifications and criteria should be developed are, among others, construction and demolition waste, some ashes and slags, scrap metals, compost, waste paper and glass.
Da bi se doseglo prenehanje statusa odpadka, je lahko postopek predelave enostaven – npr. pregled odpadkov, da se ugotovi, ali izpolnjujejo merila za prenehanje statusa odpadka.
For the purposes of reaching end-of-waste status, a recovery operation may be as simple as the checking of waste to verify that it fulfils the end-of-waste crite ria .
(Prvi del je nov predlog spremembe, ki temelji na členu 62(2)(c) poslovnika, drugi del je nov pri obravnavi pregleda prve obravnave, da bi se zagotovila skladnost z mednarodnimi obvezami)
(First part is a new amendment based on Rule 62(2)(c) of the Rules of Procedure, second part is new to address an oversight in first reading so as to ensure coherence with international obligations.)
Prvi del: V skladu s predlogoma sprememb 4 in 11, ki ju je vložil poročevalec, lahko odpadek neha biti odpadek, ko je dokončana operacija ponovne uporabe, recikliranja ali predelave.
First part: In line with amendments 4 and 11 by the rapporteur, waste can only cease to be a waste when the re-use, recycling or recovery operation is completed.
Zgolj pregled odpadkov ni enakovreden zaključevanju dejavnosti predelave.
A mere checking of waste cannot be tantamount to completing a recovery operation.
Drugi del: koncepta stranskega proizvoda in odpadka, ki preneha biti odpadek, nista poznana v mednarodni zakonodaji, kot je baselska konvencija o prehodu nevarnih in drugih odpadkov preko meja.
Second part: The concepts of by-products and of a waste ceasing to be waste are not known in international waste legislation such as the Basel Convention on trans-boundary shipments of hazardous and other wastes.
Da bi se zagotovila popolna skladnost z mednarodnimi obvezami, ju ni možno uporabiti za prehod odpadkov prek meja.
In order to ensure full compliance with international obligations, they cannot apply for trans-boundary shipments.
Smernice, ki jih je objavila Komisija (21. februarja 2007), so ustrezen okvir za pojasnitev tega vprašanja in preprečitev morebitnih sodnih postopkov.
The guidelines published by the Commission (21 February 2007) are the relevant framework for clarifying this question and avoiding potential legal proceedings.
Opredelitev iz skupnega stališča Sveta bi lahko povzročila še večjo zmedo in nezaželeno prekvalifikacjo odpadkov v stranske proizvode.
The definition contained in the Council's common position could cause greater confusion and lead to an undesirable reclassification of waste as by-products.
(20a) ko za snov ali predmet preneha veljati status odpadka, njegova uporaba na splošno ne sme imeti škodljivih posledic za okolje ali zdravje.
(20a) The end-of-waste status must not overall have a harmful impact on the environment or health due to the use of the substance or object.
To v vseh primerih pomeni, da sekundarni proizvodi ne smejo vsebovati večjega deleža onesnaževal kot primerljive surovine.
This means at all events that secondary products must not contain higher levels of pollutants than comparable primary raw mate ria ls.
Za uporabo tega merila se mora uporabljati certifikacijski sistem za kakovost.
A quality certification system must be used to apply this criterion.
(Skupno stališče spremninja ta člen o prenehanju statusa odpadka.
(The common position amends the article on end of waste status.
Zato je pojasnilo potrebno)
This renders a clarification necessary.)
Prenehanje statusa odpadka ne sme škodovati okolju ali zdravju.
The end of waste status must not damage the environment or health.
Vendar se lahko vsebnost onesnaževal v proizvodu odraža na njihovem širjenju v okolju.
However, the incorporation of pollutants into a product can result in pollutants spreading into the environment.
Če se, na primer, za pridobivanje gradbenih materialov uporablja očiščeno svinčeno steklo katodnih cevi, se lahko v prihodnosti zgodi, da se to sprosti ob podiranju.
For example, using purified lead glass from cathode ray tubes to manufacture building mate ria ls could result in a future release of lead at the time of demolition.
To ne bi pomenilo trajnostne uporabe sekundarnih proizvodov.
This would not constitute sustainable use of secondary products .