natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu iz marca 2008 „Krepitev zmogljivosti odzivanja Unije na nesreče“ ( KOM(2008)0130 ) in resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. junija 2008 o krepitvi zmogljivosti odzivanja Unije na nesreče
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council of March 2008 on ‘Reinforcing the Union's Disaster Response Capacity’ (COM(2008) 0130) and the European Parliament resolution of 19 June 2008 on stepping up the Union's disaster response capacity
– ob upoštevanju poročila z dne 9. maja 2006, ki ga je pripravil Michel Barnier o evropski enoti za civilno zaščito: Europeaid,
– having regard to the report of 9 May 2006 by Michel Barnier entitled ‘For a European civil protection force: europe aid’,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. februarja 2010 o nedavnem potresu na Haitiju
– having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 10 February 2010 on the recent earthquake in Haiti
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. septembra 2010 o preprečevanju naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek,
– having regard to its resolution of 21 September 2010 on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters,
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu z dne 23. marca 2010 o vzpostavitvi zmogljivosti za hitro odzivanje EU, ki so ga predložili Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Charles Goerens, Louis Michel, Marielle De Sarnez in Frédérique Ries v imenu skupine ALDE, v skladu s členom 121(1) poslovnika ( B7-0228/2010 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council of 23 March 2010 on setting up an EU rapid response capability, presented by Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Charles Goerens, Louis Michel, Marielle De Sarnez and Frédérique Ries on behalf of the ALDE Group pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure ( B7‑0228/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 121(3) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 121(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7‑0332/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7‑0332/2010 ),
A. ker število naravnih nesreč, ki povzročajo veliko človeško, gospodarsko in okoljsko škodo, po vsem svetu narašča; ker so te nesreče vse intenzivnejše, vse pogostejše in vse bolj razširjene po vsem svetu, predvsem kot posledica podnebnih sprememb in ker si Evropska unija zelo prizadeva za odziv na te nesreče,
A. whereas disasters causing significant human, economic and environmental damage are on the increase worldwide; whereas such crises are happening with greater impact, frequency and scope in more parts of the world, mainly due to the effects of climate change ; and whereas the European Union is making considerable efforts to respond to these crises,
B. ker vedno večje število in pogostost posredovanj znotraj in izven Evropske unije spremljajo svetovna finančna kriza in proračunske omejitve, kar še povečuje nujnost večje stroškovne učinkovitosti delovanja,
B. whereas the multiplication and greater frequency of interventions inside and outside the European Union are compounded by the global financial situation and budgetary constraints which underline the need for more cost effective operations,
C. ker lahko medsebojne izmenjave virov med 31 državami članicami, ki sodelujejo v mehanizmu Skupnosti za civilno zaščito (EU–27, Norveška, Lihtenštajn, Hrvaška, Islandija) ali v okviru okrepljenega sodelovanja med državami članicami, pomenijo hkrati operativno in tudi finančno prednost,
C. whereas sharing of resources among the 31 states that are members of the Community civil protection mechanism (EU-27, Norway, Lichtenstein, Croatia, Iceland), or in the context of enhanced cooperation between Member States, can represent an operational and financial asset,
D. ker proračun Komisije za humanitarne nesreče, natančneje za generalni direktorat ECHO, ni bil le zamrznjen, temveč se je v zadnjih petih letih realno nekoliko zmanjšal,
D. whereas the Commission's budget for humanitarian disasters, and specifically that of DG ECHO , has not merely been frozen but has fallen slightly in real terms over the last five years,
E. ker je bil v zadnjih letih dosežen napredek v povezavi z bolj usklajenim odzivom EU na nesreče, zlasti s postopno krepitvijo mehanizma za civilno zaščito, boljšim sodelovanjem/usklajevanjem med civilno zaščito in humanitarno pomočjo, in spoznanjem, da celostni pristop k obvladovanju nesreč ne pomeni le odzivanja, marveč tudi preprečevanje in pripravljenost,
E. whereas progress has been made in recent years towards a more coherent EU disaster response, notably through progressive strengthening of the civil protection mechanism, better interaction/coordination between civil protection and humanitarian aid, and the recognition that an integrated approach to disaster management involves not only response but also prevention and preparedness,
F. ker je odziv Evropske unije na potres na Haitiju sprožil ne le hitro, pomembno in obsežno posredovanje humanitarne pomoči, ampak obenem aktiviral mehanizem civilne zaščite, ki je omogočil takojšnjo uporabo – prvič – dveh modulov (enoto za prečiščevanje vode in napredno postajo za zdravniško oskrbo), ki se financirata s pripravljalnim ukrepom za leto 2008 za zmogljivosti za hitro odzivanje EU,
F. whereas the European Union's response to the earthquake in Haiti triggered not only a rapid, significant and large scale humanitarian aid intervention but also the activation of the civil protection mechanism which was able to deploy immediately and for the first time two modules (a water purification unit and an advanced medical post) financed through a 2008 Preparatory Action for an EU rapid response capability,
G. ker izkušnje, pridobljene v zadnjih krizah, še vedno kažejo, da je treba izboljšati odziv EU na nesreče v smislu učinkovitosti, usklajenosti in prepoznavnosti, in ker so te nesreče znova pokazale, da je nujno oblikovati zmogljivost za hitro odzivanje EU (evropska enota civilne zaščite),
G. whereas lessons learned from recent crises continue to demonstrate the need to improve the EU’s disaster response in terms of efficiency, coordination and visibility, and whereas these disasters have once again highlighted the need for an EU rapid response capability (European civil protection force),
H. ker je sposobnost EU na področju varovanja življenj in lastnine državljanov odločilnega pomena za njeno verodostojnost,
H. whereas the EU’s capacity to protect citizens’ lives and property is a decisive factor for its credibility,
(a) potrjuje, da bi z dodelitvijo civilne zaščite in humanitarne pomoči enemu samemu komisarju, ki bi bil pristojen za humanitarno pomoč in odzivanje na krizne razmere, bolje povezali obe področji znotraj Komisije in pripomogli k večji usklajenosti celotnega odziva EU na nesreče;
(a) acknowledges that the inclusion of civil protection and humanitarian aid within the portfolio of a single Commissioner responsible for Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response creates better synergies within the Commission and helps enhance the coherence of the overall EU disaster response;
(b) poziva k tesnejšemu povezovanju delovnih metodologij civilne zaščite in humanitarne pomoči v GD ECHO, ob ohranjanju njunih posebnosti z jasno ločitvijo ter razmejitvijo njunih vlog, da se izboljšajo sinergije in medsebojno dopolnjevanje ter poveča učinkovitost; poziva tudi k temu, da vojaško, civilno in humanitarno osebje, ki posreduje pri nesrečah in v humanitarnih operacijah, ravna v skladu z načeli nevtralnosti, neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti;
(b) calls for greater integration between civil protection and humanitarian working methodologies within DG ECHO, while preserving their specific features by maintaining a clear distinction and demarcation of roles between them, in order to maximize synergies and complementarities and to enhance efficiency; calls also for military and civilian personnel and humanitarian workers involved in disaster response or humanitarian operations to act in accordance with the principles of neutrality, independence and impartiality;
(c) poudarja, da mora morebitna uporaba sredstev civilne zaščite v humanitarnih krizah temeljiti na potrebah in dopolnjevati humanitarno pomoč ter biti z njo usklajena, skladno z evropskim soglasjem o humanitarni pomoči in s smernicami Združenih narodov (smernice iz Osla), da se zagotovi spoštovanje humanitarnih načel nevtralnosti, humanosti, nepristranskosti in neodvisnosti;
(c) reiterates that the use of civil protection resources, where deployed in any humanitarian crisis, should be needs driven and complementary to, and coherent with, humanitarian aid , in accordance with the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid and the United Nations guidelines (Oslo guidelines), with a view to ensuring compliance with the humanitarian principles of neutrality, humanity, impartiality and independence;
(d) vztraja, da bi morala biti pomoč EU v primeru naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek, namenjena, kadar koli je mogoče, lokalnemu gospodarstvu, na primer nakupovanju lokalno ali regionalno pridelanih živil, pa tudi zagotavljanju potrebnega materiala za kmete, da se oživi podeželsko gospodarstvo;
(d) insists that EU assistance in the event of natural or man-made disasters should aim, wherever possible, at helping the local economy, for example by purchasing locally or regionally produced foodstuffs as well as providing the necessary materials for farmers in order to relaunch the rural economy;
(e) poziva Svet in Komisijo naj pojasni dogovore za sodelovanje in usklajevanje med Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje in Komisijo glede vodenja obsežnih akcij odzivanja na nesreče izven ozemlja Evropske unije;
(e) asks the Council and the Commission to clarify the arrangements for cooperation and coordination between the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Commission for the management of a large-scale disaster response outside the territory of the European Union;
(f) predlaga krajevno omejeno usklajevanje v sodelovanju z vladami prizadetih držav, pri čemer predstavniki EU in držav članic na terenu zagotavljajo ciljno usmerjen in ustrezen odziv na prizadetih območjih;
(f) suggests localised coordination efforts, in cooperation with the national government of the affected state, using EU and Member States' representatives on the ground to ensure a targeted and competent response to affected localities;
(g) poziva Svet, naj okrepi zmogljivosti odziva EU na nesreče kot eno od glavnih prednostnih nalog, zlasti z vidika razprav o oblikovanju enote EU za civilno zaščito, in sledi ponavljajočim se zahtevah Evropskega parlamenta, da je treba uresničiti predloge, podane v Barnierjevem poročilu iz leta 2006;
(g) urges the Council to strengthen the EU’s disaster response capacity as a high priority, especially in view of the discussions on setting up an EU Civil Protection Force, and to follow up the European Parliament’s repeated requests that the proposals put forward in the Barnier report in 2006 should be implemented;
(h) poziva k takojšnji vzpostavitvi sil EU za civilno zaščito, ki morajo biti ustrezno opremljene s potrebnimi tehnološkimi in tehničnimi viri;
(h) calls for the immediate establishment of an EU Civil Protection Force which must be adequately equipped with the necessary technological and technical resources ;
(i) poziva tudi, v okviru posredovanja po naravnih nesrečah, k boljšemu usklajevanju med humanitarnimi agencijami in mehanizmi za civilno zaščito držav članic ter GD ECHO in morebitno evropsko enoto civilne zaščite;
(i) calls also, in the context of operations following a natural disaster, for better coordination between the humanitarian agencies and the civil protection mechanisms of the Member States and DG ECHO, and any future European civil protection force;
(j) poziva Komisijo, naj z nacionalnimi vladami, lokalnimi oblastmi in organizacijami civilne družbe v državah upravičenkah razvije programe v zvezi z zmogljivostmi za preprečevanje nesreč in upravljanje odzivanja nanje v skupnosti;
(j) urges the Commission to develop programs with national governments, local authorities and civil society organisations in beneficiary countries with regard to community-based disaster prevention and response management capacity;
(k) poziva Svet, naj (na pobudo Komisije) po običajnem zakonodajnem postopku sprejme ukrepe, ki bodo izboljšali predvidljivost in zmogljivosti vnaprejšnjega načrtovanja obstoječega mehanizma civilne zaščite EU, ki sedaj temelji na ad-hoc in prostovoljnih prispevkih držav članic; predlaga, naj ti ukrepi upoštevajo dogovore, preizkušene v okviru pripravljalnih ukrepov EU, vključno s sredstvi na ravni EU, prostovoljnim zbiranjem sredstev, določanjem obstoječih zmogljivosti, opredelitvijo scenarijev in razvojem nadaljnjih usposabljanj;
(k) encourages the Council to adopt , under the ordinary legislative procedure, measures (to be proposed by the Commission) for improving the predictability and the forward-planning capacity of the current EU civil protection mechanism, which is currently based on ad-hoc and voluntary contributions from Member States; suggests that these measures may include arrangements tested under the EU Preparatory Action including EU-level assets, voluntary pooling of resources, mapping of existing capacities, identification of scenarios and the development of further training activities;
(l) poziva tudi k oblikovanju realističnih proračunov, v katerih bodo zneski za naravne nesreče in humanitarno pomoč določeni na podlagi izdatkov v preteklih letih;
(l) calls also for realistic budgets in which appropriations for natural disasters or humanitarian action are allocated on the basis of previous years' spending;
(m) meni, da bi morala enota EU za civilno zaščito nadgraditi mehanizem civilne zaščite EU in tako optimizirati razpoložljiva sredstva, ki bila učinkovitejša in bolj prepoznavna, združevati na prostovoljni osnovi obstoječe logistične in človeške vire, z vidika usposabljanja za odzivanje ob nesrečah in tudi z vidika upravljanja nesreč, tako da razvije pobude, sprejete v okviru pripravljalnih ukrepov, in ki bi omogočila zagotovitev nujne pomoči v 24 urah od začetka nesreče;
(m) considers that the EU civil protection force should build on the EU Civil Protection mechanism, should optimise the tools available, which would gain in efficiency and visibility, should involve the voluntary pooling of existing logistical and human resources with regard both to disaster-response training and disaster management by developing initiatives taken during preparatory actions, and it should be capable of providing initial aid within 24 hours of the occurrence of a disaster;
(n) predlaga, da enota civilne zaščite EU temelji na naslednjih načelih:
(n) recommends that the EU civil protection force be based on the principles that it should:
– temelji na oceni potreb ob sodelovanju vseh humanitarnih delavcev
- be based on an assessment of needs, with the participation of all humanitarian actors,
– je civilna
- be civilian
– deluje pod zastavo Evropske unije
- operate under the banner of the EU
– spoštuje mednarodno humanitarno pravo
- observe international humanitarian law
– spoštuje načela prostovoljnega sodelovanja držav članic v sistemu, ki se bo oblikoval
- respect the voluntary nature of the Member States’ participation in the intended arrangements
– deluje po načelu porazdelitve bremena
- be based on the principle of burden-sharing
– je odprta za prispevke držav, ki niso članice EU
- be open to contributions from non-EU countries
– priznava glavno vlogo OZN pri usklajevanju mednarodnega reševanja izven ozemlja Evropske Unije
- recognise the UN’s overall role in coordinating international relief outside the territory of the European Union;
– organizirana je na preventiven način glede na različne možne poteke dogodkov;
- be organised on a preventive basis, according to specific scenarios;
(o) meni, da bi morala EU glede na operacije humanitarne pomoči in na podlagi izkušenj s posredovanjem na Haitiju in v Pakistanu, kadar je le mogoče, ukrepati pod usklajevalnim okriljem ZN in se usmeriti na tista področja posredovanja, kjer lahko ustvari največjo dodano vrednost;
(o) considers that, with particular reference to humanitarian aid operations, and based on the lessons learned from intervention in Haiti and Pakistan, the EU should, as far as possible, operate under the coordinating umbrella of the UN, concentrating on those fields where its intervention can contribute greater added value;
(p) meni, da bi evropska enota civilne zaščite lahko temeljila na zavezi nekaj držav članic, da na razpolago ponudijo svoje module civilne zaščite, ki so vnaprej določeni in pripravljeni za takojšnje ukrepanje v dejavnostih EU, ki jih usklajuje Center za spremljanje in obveščanje (MIC), da bi večina teh modulov, ki so na nacionalni ravni že na voljo in ne zahtevajo večjih dodatnih stroškov, ostala pod njihovim nadzorom ter da bi uporaba teh modulov v pripravljenosti predstavljala temelj sistema civilne zaščite EU pri odzivanju na nesreče znotraj in zunaj EU;
(p) considers that the European civil protection force could be based on a commitment by some Member States to voluntarily make available pre-determined civil protection modules that are ready to intervene immediately in EU operations coordinated by the MIC, that most of these modules, which are already available nationally and thus would not entail significant additional costs, would remain under their control, and that the deployment of these modules placed on standby would form the nucleus of the EU’s civil protection system for responding to disasters inside and outside the EU;
(q) meni, da bi lahko EU financirala dodatne module civilne zaščite za določene posebne potrebe, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti in kjer bi evropska raven prinesla dodano vrednost, ter poudarja, da je pomembno okrepiti financiranje prevoza in razviti prevozne module v pripravljenosti;
(q) considers that additional civil protection modules could be financed by the EU for certain specific requirements where gaps have been identified and where the European level would add value, and stresses the importance of increasing funding for transport and developing standby transport modules;
(r) poudarja, da je treba oblikovati celovit in proaktiven pristop za odzivanje na nesreče, ki bo usklajeval različna sredstva za ukrepanje, ki so na voljo Uniji in državam članicam, kot so krizno upravljanje (civilno in vojaško), finančna pomoč in razvoj ter socialne in okoljske politike; glede na to meni, da bi bilo treba učinkoviteje voditi prehod med odzivanjem na nesreče in obnovo po njih; opominja na predlog za vzpostavitev evropskih prostovoljskih enot za humanitarno pomoč v skladu z določbami Lizbonske pogodbe (člen 214, odstavek 5) in glede na evropsko leto prostovoljstva 2011 spodbuja Evropsko komisijo in Svet, naj skupaj z Evropskim parlamentom obravnavata pravila in postopke za dejavnosti enot, takoj ko bo mogoče, zlasti glede na podobne pobude, sprejete v nekaterih državah članicah;
(r) underlines the need to develop a comprehensive and proactive approach in response to disasters, coordinating the various means of action available to the Union and its Member States, such as crisis management (civil and military), financial assistance and development or social and environmental policies; believes in this context that the transition between disaster response and post-disaster reconstruction should be managed more efficiently; recalls the proposal to set up a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps in accordance with the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty (Article 214(5)), and with a view to the European Year of Volunteering 2011 encourages the European Commission and the Council to work, together with the European Parliament, on the rules and procedures for the operation of the Corps as soon as possible, especially in the light of similar initiatives taken by some Member States;
(s) opozarja Svet, da bi se morala vojaška sredstva in zmogljivosti pri odzivu na nesreče, zlasti za logistično, prevozno in infrastrukturno podporo operacijam humanitarne pomoči, uporabiti le izjemoma, v "skrajni sili" in vedno skladno z obstoječimi dogovori, kot sta Evropsko soglasje o humanitarni pomoči in Smernice o uporabi vojaških in civilnih obrambnih sredstev pri mednarodni pomoči ob nesrečah, ki so bile sprejete v Oslu;
(s) reminds the Council that the use of military assets and capabilities in disaster response , particularly for logistics, transport and infrastructure support for humanitarian aid operations, should be exceptional, used as a ‘last resort’ and always in compliance with existing agreements such as the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid and the Oslo guidelines on the use of military and civil defence assets in international disaster relief;
(t) priznava, da mora biti uporaba vojaških in civilnih obrambnih sredstev za pomoč ob nesrečah res zadnja možnost, kar je v skladu z evropskim soglasjem o humanitarni pomoči in smernicami iz Osla; opominja, da vojaška sredstva pogosto pomembno prispevajo k odzivanju na nesreče, skupaj s civilno zaščito in humanitarno pomočjo, in opaža, da so včasih potrebna za zapolnjevanje kritičnih vrzeli v zmogljivostih (zlasti strateški most, specializirana sredstva, težka industrija in transport); zato poudarja, da je treba razviti celosten pristop, izboljšati sinergije med civilnimi in vojaškimi zmogljivostmi ter opredeliti področja, kjer bi lahko države članice združile svoja prizadevanja in zmogljivosti na ravni EU, da bi prispevale k odzivanju EU na nesreče, kar je še posebej pomembno v težavnem gospodarskem ozračju;
(t) acknowledges that military and civil defence assets in disaster relief should be used as a last resort, in compliance with the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid and the Oslo guidelines; recalls that military means often constitute an important contribution to disaster response, along with civil protection and humanitarian aid, and notes that military assets can be necessary for filling critical capacity gaps (particularly strategic lift, specialised assets, heavy engineering and transport); therefore stresses the need to develop a comprehensive approach and to improve synergies between civil and military capabilities, and to identify areas in which Member States can pool their efforts and capabilities at EU level to contribute to EU disaster response, which is particularly important in a difficult economic climate;
(u) poudarja, da je treba vzpostaviti civilne zmogljivosti v EU, ki bodo vedno na voljo in bodo delovale neodvisno od vojaških struktur, ter opredeliti področja, kjer lahko države članice v tem smislu združijo svoja prizadevanja in zmogljivosti na ravni EU;
(u) emphasises the need to build up permanently available civilian capabilities in the EU which operate independently from military structures and to identify areas in which Member States can pool their efforts and capabilities at EU level in this respect;
(v) poziva Svet in Komisijo naj sodelujeta pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta za prepoznavnost, ki naj vsebuje dejanske ukrepe za izboljšanje prepoznavnosti odziva EU na nesreče;
(v) urges the Council and the Commission to cooperate on the implementation of a visibility action plan that should include concrete measures to enhance the visibility of the EU’s disaster response;
(w) spodbuja uporabo sistema za globalno spremljanje okolja in varnosti (GMES), da bodo morebitna krizna območja stalno pod nadzorom, kar bo omogočilo boljšo pripravljenost za pošiljanje humanitarne pomoči, in opozarja na ključni pomen vzpostavitve mehanizma za nadaljnje spremljanje prizadevanj EU in ocenjevanje uporabljene pomoči;
(w) encourages the utilisation of the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) system to keep potential crisis areas under surveillance, allowing for better preparedness in sending humanitarian support, and stresses the critical importance of establishing a follow-up mechanism on EU efforts and assessment of deployed assistance;