natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kot je razvidno iz besedila tega člena, so podatki le potrebno sredstvo za izpolnitev cilja Komisije, saj lahko Komisija „na podlagi teh podatkov in informacij“ določi „potencialna prihodnja neskladja med ponudbo in povpraševanjem“ , ugotovi „ovire za investiranje in [spodbuja] najboljše prakse za njihovo odstranjevanje“ in poveča „preglednost za udeležence na trgu“ .
As appears from the formulation of this article, the data constitute merely the necessary means of achieving the Commission's objective, since it is "on the basis of this data and information" that the Commission will be able to identify "potential future gaps of energy demand and supply" , "investment obstacles and [promote] best practices to address them" and increase "transparency for market participants" .
Ti členi ustrezajo uvodnim izjavam 1 do 5 in uvodni izjavi 15, ki vzpostavljajo okvir, v katerem bo potekalo zbiranje informacij, to je „[u]vedba skupne energetske politike“ .
These articles correspond to recitals 1 to 5 and recital 15, which establish the framework within which the collection of information is to take place, namely "the introduction of a common energy policy".
(a) Na podlagi normativnega dela
(a) In the light of the enacting terms
Iz člena 10 predlagane uredbe je mogoče razbrati, da je njen namen omogočiti Komisiji, da:
It appears from Article 10 of the proposed regulation that its purpose is to enable the Commission to:
(a) določi potencialna prihodnja neskladja med ponudbo in povpraševanjem na področju energije;
(a) identify potential future gaps in energy demand and supply;
(b) ugotovi ovire za investiranje in spodbuja najboljše prakse za njihovo odstranjevanje;
(b) identify investment obstacles and promote best practices to address them;
(c) poveča preglednost za udeležence na trgu.
(c) increase transparency for market participants.
Ti cilji so nedvomno povezani s cilji iz člena 194 PDEU, saj ta določa, da mora energetska politika Unije „zagotoviti delovanje energetskega trga“ (glej (b) in (c)).
Those aims are assuredly connected with those set out in Article 194 TFEU, since it provides that Union policy on energy has to "ensure the functioning of the energy market" (see (b) and (c)).
Člen 194 določa tudi, da mora politika Unije „zagotoviti zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo v Uniji“ in točka (a) je očitno namenjena spodbujanju tega .
Article 194 further provides that Union policy is to " ensure security of energy supply in the Union " , which point (a) is obviously designed to promote.
(b) Na podlagi uvoda
(b) In the light of the preamble
V uvodnih izjavah so navedeni razlogi oz. obrazložitev za predlagani akt.
The recitals set out the reasons, the justification, for the proposed act.
Prva se navezuje na „uvedb[o] skupne energetske politike“ .
The first of them refers to the "introduction of a common energy policy" .
Uvedba takšne politike je dolgoročni projekt, ki je dolgo veljala za prazne sanje
The introduction of such a policy is a long-term project which remained for long a pipe dream
Glej Yves Petit, „A la recherche de la politique européenne de l'énergie“, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen , Pariz, Dalloz, 2006, letnik 42, št. 4, str.
See Yves Petit, "A la recherche de la politique européenne de l'énergie", Revue trimestrielle de droit européen , Paris, Dalloz, 2006, v. 42, n.
593–620. , in je postala resničnost šele z uvedbo v novem Naslovu XXI PDEU kot rezultat Lizbonske pogodbe.
4, at pp. 593-620. and did not become a reality until the introduction of the new Title XXI in the TFEU as a result of the Lisbon Treaty.
Ustrezno je v uvodni izjavi 1 navedeno, da je uvedba skupne energetske politike „cilj, ki si ga je Skupnost sama zastavila“ .
Accordingly, recital 1 recalls that the introduction of a common energy policy is "an objective which the Community has set itself" .
V uvodni izjavi 2 je vzpostavljena neposredna povezava med energetsko politiko in predlagano uredbo, saj je navedeno, da je „[e]den od elementov te politike [...] dobiti celovito sliko razvoja investiranja v energetsko infrastrukturo v Skupnosti“ .
For its part, recital 2 makes a direct connection between energy policy and the proposed regulation by stating that "[o]btaining an overall picture of the development of investment in energy infrastructure in the Community is one feature of such a policy" .
Glede na navedeno lahko rečemo, da prvi uvodni izjavi predlagano uredbo umeščata na področje skupne energetske politike.
It can therefore be said that the first two recitals situate the proposed regulation in the field of the common energy policy.
Še natančneje pa je namen nadaljnjih uvodnih izjav pokazati, kako bo zbiranje podatkov o investicijskih projektih omogočilo izpolnitev posebnih ciljev politike Unije v zvezi z energijo, to je „zagotavljanje oskrbe Skupnosti z energijo“ (uvodna izjava 3) in pravilno delovanje energetskih trgov z vzpostavitvijo „večje preglednosti“ (uvodna izjava 5).
More specifically, the following recitals set out to show how the collection of data on investment projects will enable certain specific objectives of the Union's policy with regard to energy to be achieved, notably "securing the Community's energy supply" (recital 3) and the proper functioning of the energy markets through "greater transparency" (recital 5).
Poleg tega je v uvodni izjavi 3 navedeno, da je splošni pregled nad investicijami na področju energetske infrastrukture bistvenega pomena tudi „za prehod na nizkoogljični energetski sistem“ .
In addition, recital 3 states that an overall view of energy infrastructure investment is also essential for “the transition towards a low carbon energy system” .
Opozoriti je treba, da člen 194 določa, da energetska politika mora upoštevati okoljsko politiko in v skladu s tem pomagati „spodbujati energetsko učinkovitost in varčevanje z energijo ter razvijanje novih in obnovljivih virov energije“ .
It is noted that Article 194 mentions that energy policy has to have regard to environmental policy and accordingly must help to “ promote energy efficiency and energy saving and the development of new and renewable forms of energy” .
Kot zadnje je v uvodni izjavi 6 navedeno, da morata Komisija in „zlasti observatorij za energetski trg“ imeti na voljo podatke, kar kaže na to, da je njihovo zbiranje neločljivo povezano z zadevo, na katero se nanašajo, torej na energijo.
Lastly, recital 6 states that the data is to be at the disposal of the Commission and “in particular the Market Observatory for Energy” , which shows that their collection is indissociably linked to the matter to which they relate, namely energy.
Povezava med zbiranjem podatkov in njihovim namenom je poudarjena v Oceni finančnih posledic zakonodajnega predloga, ki je priložena predlogu.
That link between the collection of data and their aim is emphasised in the Legislative Financial Statement annexed to the proposal.
V točki 5.2 te ocene je izpostavljeno, da uredba “ustvarja nov okvir, ki združuje poročanje in spremljanje (analizo) investicijskih projektov na področju energetske infrastrukture EU“ .
Point 5.2 of that statement points out that the regulation “creates a new framework combining reporting and monitoring (analysis) of investment projects in EU energy infrastructure” .
Na podlagi analize uvoda predloga uredbe glede na njegove cilje je mogoče sklepati, da je ta neposredno povezan z energetsko politiko Unije.
This analysis of the preamble of the proposal for a regulation in terms of its aims leads one to the conclusion that it is directly connected with the Union’s energy policy.
(c) Cilji, ki izhajajo iz dokumentov, priloženih predlogu
(c) Aims emerging from the documents annexed to the proposal
Na podlagi komentarjev iz doktrine in različnih dokumentov institucij je jasno razvidno, da je energetska politika danes bistveni cilj Unije, zato ne sme biti prepuščena poljubnemu izvajanju v posameznih državah članicah.
It is clear, both from commentaries in the doctrine and from the various documents of the institutions, that today energy policy is an essential objective of the Union and can no longer be conducted in a haphazard manner in each Member State.
Sporočanje informacij na tem področju prispeva k vzpostavitvi skupne energetske politike in približevanju držav članic na tem področju.
The communication of information in this area contributes towards the establishment of a common energy policy and towards a rapprochement of the Member States in this area.
Sporočanje informacij je potrebno za izpolnjevanje ciljev nove politike.
The communication of information is needed for the purposes of this new policy.
V obrazložitvenem memorandumu je samo še potrjen vtis, da bi morala biti uredba umeščena v okvir energetske politike.
The explanatory memorandum only confirms the impression that the regulation should be situated within the framework of energy policy.
Jasno je ponazorjeno, da gre za okvir „nove energetske politike“ in da je „[t]a predlog [...] v skladu s cilji Unije [in] v skladu s podnebno in energetsko politiko“ .
It makes it clear that the context is the “new energy policy” and that “This proposal is consistent with the objectives of the Union [and] consistent with the climate and energy policy” .
V tem okviru Komisija omenja tudi akcijski načrt Evropskega sveta za evropsko energetsko politiko za obdobje 2007–2009.
In this context, the Commission also mentions the European Council Action Plan 2007-09 on Energy Policy for Europe.
Ta načrt je za izvedbo nove politike že predvidel določitev investicij, ki so potrebne za zadovoljitev strateških potreb EU, in ponovni pregled infrastrukture za oskrbo, pri čemer bo glavno vlogo imela predlagana uredba.
That plan already envisaged, for the purposes of realising that new policy, the identification of investment required to satisfy EU strategic needs and a re-examination of supply infrastructures, in which the proposed regulation will play a full part.
Zdaj je nujno treba opredeliti, katera plat predloga uredbe ima prednost glede na to, ali se obravnava z vidika vsebine (zbiranje informacij) ali ciljev (energetski trg in zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo).
It is now necessary to establish a priority between the two thrusts of the proposal for a regulation, depending on whether it is considered from the point of view of its content (collection of information) or from that of its aims (energy market and energy security).
Kot prvo je treba omeniti, da je člen 337 naveden v Sedmem delu PDEU „Splošne in končne določbe“.
In the first place, it should be observed that Article 337 is to be found in Part Seven of the TFEU “General and Final Provisions”.
Lahko bi rekli, da je podoben členu 352, kolikor gre za vrsto „klavzule o fleksibilnosti“
It may be considered to be akin to Article 352 in so far as it is a species of “flexibility clause”
V zvezi s tem glej komentar, ki ga je o členu 284 PES podal Böse; EU Kommentar; točka V, str.
See in this connection the commentary on Article 284 EC by Böse – EU Kommentar – point V, at p.
2048. , in se lahko uporabi samo, ko je treba nadomestiti odsotnost pooblastil za ukrepanje, ki so s posebnimi določbami iz PDEU izrecno ali implicitno podeljena institucijam Skupnosti, in sicer v primeru, ko so takšna pooblastila vseeno nujna, da bi Skupnost lahko opravila svoje naloge in tako izpolnila enega izmed ciljev iz pogodbe.
2048. and may only be used in order to make up for the absence of powers of action conferred expressly or implicitly on the Community institutions by specific provisions of the TFEU in so far as such powers appear nevertheless to be necessary in order that the Community may exercise its functions with a view to attaining one of the aims set by that treaty.
Čeprav je zbiranje informacij omenjeno v členu 337, v členu 194 pa ne, se v tem primeru vseeno zdi, da je zbiranje informacij ena izmed nalog Unije iz člena 194, če te informacije prispevajo k doseganju ciljev, ki si jih je Unija sama zastavila v zvezi z energetsko politiko.
In this case, although Article 337 mentions the collection of information and Article 194 does not, it appears nevertheless that the collection of information is included among the Union attributions enshrined in Article 194 in so far as that information helps to achieve the objectives that the Union has set itself in connection with energy policy.
Kot drugo se je mogoče ob upoštevanju dejstva, da člen 337 spada med „splošne in končne določbe“, sklicevati na načelo lex specialis derogat
Next, having regard to the fact that Article 337 is among the “general and final provisions”, it is possible to rely on the principle lex specialis derogat
Glej Bertrand Peter, „La base juridique des actes en droit communautaire“, Revue du marché commun et de l4union européenne, 1991, Editions techniques et économiques, št. 378, maj 1994, str.
See Bertrand Peter, “La base juridique des actes en droit communautaire”, Revue du marché commun et de l4union européenne, 1991, Editions techniques et économiques, No 378, May 1994, p.
335. , kar pomeni, da posebno pravilo prevlada nad splošnim.
335. , that is to say that a specific rule prevails over a general one.
Kot zadnje, če obstaja še kakršen koli dvom, pa se je mogoče opreti še na sodbo Sodišča v zadevi C-176/03, Komisija in Parlament proti Svetu
Lastly, in case any doubt remains, a pertinent argument can be derived from the Court’s judgment in Case C-176/03 Commission and Parliament v. Council
V tej sodbi je Sodišče moralo razsoditi o ustrezni pravni podlagi Okvirnega Sklepa Sveta o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja.
In that judgment, the Court had to rule on the proper legal basis for a Council framework decision on the protection of the environment through criminal law.
Ker je Svet instrument utemeljil na podlagi členov o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah v okviru tretjega stebra, je Komisija s podporo Evropskega parlamenta to pravno podlago izpodbijala z utemeljitvijo, da zadeva sodi v pristojnost Skupnosti.
Whereas the Council had based the instrument on articles on judicial cooperation in criminal matters coming under the third pillar, the Commission, supported by the European Parliament, contested the legal basis on the ground that the matter fell within Community competence.
Komisija je trdila, da je „[u]sklajevanje nacionalnih kazenskih zakonodaj, zlasti elementov, ki so bistveni za okoljska kazniva dejanja in za katere se lahko izrečejo kazni, [...] zasnovano kot orodje obravnavane politike Skupnosti “
The Commission argued that “ The harmonisation of national criminal laws, in particular of the constituent elements of environmental offences to which criminal penalties attach, is designed to be an aid to the Community policy in question ”
Sodišče je najprej izpostavilo, da je varstvo okolja ena bistvenih nalog Skupnosti
The Court first pointed out that protection of the environment constituted one of the essential objectives of the Community
Po ugotovitvi, da se vsebina okvirnega sklepa v glavnem navezuje na kazensko pravo, je Sodišče vseeno menilo naslednje:
Then, after establishing that the content of the framework decision principally related to criminal law, the Court held nevertheless that:
„Ta [...] ugotovitev kljub temu ne bi smela ovirati zakonodajalca Skupnosti, če [...] kazenske sankcije, ki jih uporabljajo pristojni nacionalni organi, pomenijo potreben ukrep za boj proti hudim okoljskim kršitvam, da sprejme ukrepe v povezavi s kazenskim pravom držav članic, za katere meni, da so potrebni za zagotavljanje polne učinkovitosti norm, ki jih določa na področju varstva okolja.“
“[this] finding does not prevent the Community legislature, when the application of ... criminal penalties by the competent national authorities is an essential measure for combating serious environmental offences, from taking measures which relate to the criminal law of the Member States which it considers necessary in order to ensure that the rules which it lays down on environmental protection are fully effective.”
Če so ukrepi nujni za dosego določenega cilja, je mogoče sklepati, da bo Sodišče izbralo pravno podlago, ki bo ustrezala temu cilju, in tako dalo prednost posrednemu cilju (varstvo okolja) pred bolj neposrednim (usklajevanje kazenske zakonodaje).
It therefore appears that where measures are essential for attaining a particular objective, the Court will choose the legal basis relating to that objective, therefore giving preference to a more remote aim (protection of the environment) over a more immediate one (harmonisation of criminal law).
Glej Hubert Haenel; Communication sur les propositions de directives établissant des sanctions pénales; seja francoskega senata z dne 17. julija 2007.
See Hubert Haenel – Communication sur les propositions de directives établissant des sanctions pénales – Sénat (France), meeting of 17 July 2007.
Po ugotovitvi, da se na podlagi predloga uredbe zdi, da je zbiranje informacij nujno za oblikovanje splošnega pregleda nad energetskim trgom in s tem tudi nujno za izpolnitev ciljev iz člena 194 PDEU, je v konkretnem primeru mogoče sklepati, da bi morala imeti pravna podlaga za energijo (torej ta člen) prednost pred členom 337, zlasti zato, ker ne gre za vprašanje prednosti določenega naslova pred drugim, ampak za prednost določbe iz določenega naslova pred splošno ali končno določbo.
In the instant case, therefore, having established that it appears from the proposal for a regulation that the collection of information is essential for creating an overall view of the energy market and hence for the attainment of the objectives set by the Treaty in Article 194, it may be concluded that the legal basis for energy (namely that article) should prevail over Article 337, a fortiori since it is not a question of causing a specific title to prevail over another, but a provision located in a specific title over a general and final provision.
Po ugotovitvi, da ima prednost povezava z energijo, je treba prav tako preučiti, ali zaradi posebne narave področja, na katerega se nanaša sporočanje informacij, torej „investicijskih projektov na področju energetske infrastrukture “ , ni potrebna uporaba posebne pravne podlage, in sicer členov 170 in 171 PDEU o vseevropskih omrežjih.
Having established that the relationship to energy prevails, it is necessary also to consider whether the specific nature of the area to which the notification of information relates, namely “investment projects in energy infrastructure ” , does not necessitate recourse to a more specific legal basis, that is to say, Articles 170 and 171 TFUE on trans-European networks.
V skladu s členom 170 mora Unija „prispeva[ti] k vzpostavitvi in razvoju vseevropskih omrežij na področju prometne, telekomunikacijske in energetske infrastrukture“ .
According to Article 170, the Union must “contribute to the establishment and development of trans-European networks” in particular in the area of energy infrastructures.
Da bi dosegla ta cilj, Unija lahko „podpira projekte skupnega interesa, ki jih podpirajo države članice“ (tretja alinea člena 171) in pripravi „vrsto smernic, ki zajemajo cilje, prednostne naloge in splošno zasnovo ukrepov, predvidenih na področju vseevropskih omrežij“ (prva alinea člena 171).
In order to achieve that objective, the Union may “support projects of common interest supported by Member States” (Article 171, third indent) and shall establish “a series of guidelines covering the objectives, priorities and broad lines of measures envisaged in the sphere of trans-European networks” (Article 171, first indent).
To bi lahko zajemalo zbiranje, analiziranje in sporočanje informacij.
This could cover the collection, analysis and notification of information.
Glavni vprašanji, obravnavani v naslovu o vseevropskih omrežjih, pa sta medobratovalnost in podpora Komisije skupnim projektom.
However, the main questions dealt with under the title on trans-European networks are interoperability and Commission support for common projects.
V nasprotju pa je v skladu z obravnavanim predlogom uredbe naloga Komisije zbiranje informacij o nacionalnih infrastrukturnih projektih, da bi dobila boljši pregled nad celotnim evropskim energetskim trgom.
In contrast, under the proposal for a regulation under consideration, the Commission is to collect information about national infrastructure projects in order that it may have a better picture of the whole of the European energy market.
Zbiranje informacij, določeno v predlagani uredbi, presega „vseevropsko“ razsežnost, saj zajema vse investicije, tudi nacionalne, medtem ko obstoječa uredba na primer zajema samo čezmejna plinska omrežja
The collection of information provided for in the proposed regulation goes beyond the “trans-European” since it covers all investments, including national investments, whereas the existing regulation covers, for instance, only trans-frontier gas networks
Glej Oceno učinka, SEC (2009) 971 končna, str.
See the Impact Assessment, SEC (2009) 971 final, at p.
Seveda je možno, da bo Komisija po analizi zbranih podatkov ukrepala specifično na področju vseevropskih omrežij.
Obviously, it is possible that the Commission will act specifically in the field of trans-European networks following its analysis of the data collected.
Vseeno pa njen cilj ni ukrepati na ravni vseevropskih omrežij, ampak samo oceniti, kakšne ukrepe je treba sprejeti z vidika investicijskih projektov na področju energetike, da bi rešili morebitne težave.
However, its aim is not to act at the level of trans-European networks, but only to evaluate in the light of energy investment projects what action the Union should take in order to overcome any difficulties.
Tako je v obrazložitvenem memorandumu navedeno, da je uredba v skladu s cilji Unije, to je z „vzpostavitvijo notranjega trga“ in „trajnostnim razvojem Evrope, ki temelji na uravnoteženi gospodarski rasti in stabilnosti cen“.
Accordingly, it is mentioned in the explanatory memorandum that the regulation is consistent with the objectives of the Union, namely “the establishment of an internal market” and “the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability.
Predlog je skladen tudi „s podnebno in energetsko politiko, za katero je eden od stebrov varnost oskrbe z energijo“.
The proposal is also consistent with the climate and energy policy, one of the pillars of which is the security of energy supply”.
Poleg tega se uvodna izjava 1 sklicuje na energetsko politiko, v uvodni izjavi 2 pa je navedeno, da je eden od elementov te politike pridobitev celovite slike razvoja investiranja v energetsko infrastrukturo v Skupnosti.
In addition, recital 1 refers to a common energy policy and recital 2 explains that obtaining an overall picture of the development of investment in energy infrastructure in the Community is one feature of such a policy.
Tako se zdi, da je treba predlagano uredbo umestiti v okvir skupne energetske politike, opredeljene v členu 194 PDEU, čeprav se ta izrecno uporablja za energetske infrastrukture.
Consequently, it appears that, although the proposed regulation applies to specifically to energy infrastructures, it is to be situated in the context of the common energy policy envisaged in Article 194 TFEU.
Člen pokriva vse vidike prelagane uredbe, saj zajema tako „medsebojno povezovanje energetskih omrežij“ kot tudi energetski trg, zanesljivost in energetsko učinkovitost.
That article covers all the aspects of the proposed regulation by taking in both the “interconnection of energy networks” and the energy market, security and energy efficiency.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na seji 28. januarja 2010 ustrezno sprejel soglasno odločitev, z 19 glasovi za in brez vzdržanega glasu
At its meeting of 28 January 2010 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously, by 19 votes in favour with no abstentions