natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4) ponovno poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj v svoje letno poročilo poleg natančnih podatkov o izpolnjevanju pogojev iz člena 7 Uredbe ESPG, ki zadevajo izvajanje pomoči ESPG s strani držav članic, vključi tudi analizo o tem, kateri ukrepi so še posebej prispevali k enakosti med moškimi in ženskami pri vključevanju v trg dela;
4) Reiterates its call upon the European Commission to include in their annual report not only detailed information about the compliance of Member States' implementation of the EGF assistance with regard to Article 7 of the EGF regulation but also an analysis of which measures promoted especially the equality of men and women with regard to the integration in the labour market.
5) poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj oblikujejo seznam ukrepov, pripravljenih s pomočjo sredstev ESPG, ki so bili najuspešnejši pri povečanju mobilnosti delavcev na nacionalnem in čezmejnem trgu dela, kar zadeva iskanje zaposlitve v sosednjih državah;
5) Calls upon the Member States and the Commission to establish a list of those measures put in place with the assistance of the EGF which were most successful in increasing the mobility of workers on the national labour market as well as cross border with regard to finding employment in neighbouring countries.
6) poudarja, da so spodbude k zaposlovanju zelo sporni ukrepi; zato poziva Komisijo, naj zelo pozorno analizira izkušnje s temi ukrepi v okviru pomoči ESPG in o tem čim prej poroča Evropskemu parlamentu;
6) Underlines that job incentives are highly disputed measures; asks, therefore, the Commission to pay special attention to the experiences made with these measures in the framework of the EGF assistance and to report back to the European Parliament as soon as possible.
7) poziva Komisijo, naj ga obvesti, če bo namenila posebno pozornost porabi sredstev v okviru ESPG glede posebnega postopka, in zahteva pripravo poročila o rezultatih revizij vlog za ESPG v letih 2007 in 2008;
7) Asks the Commission to inform the EP if the spending in the framework of the EGF receives particular attention by the Commission with regard to its special procedure and requests a report on the outcomes of the audits of the EGF applications of 2007 and 2008.
8) poziva Komisijo, naj v svoja letna poročila vključi celovite informacije o vzajemnem dopolnjevanju ESPG in ukrepov, ki se podpirajo s sredstvi drugih strukturnih skladov, kar vključuje informacije o upravnih strukturah, vzpostavljenih v državah članicah za upravljanje procesov glede izpolnjevanja pogojev iz člena 6 Uredbe ESPG;
8) Asks the Commission to include into their annual reports comprehensive information about the complementarity of the EGF with the measures supported by other Structural Funds and including information about the administrative structures put in place in the Member States to manage the compliance with Article 6 of the EGF regulation.
9) poudarja, da je poleg dobrega finančnega upravljanja treba imeti dobro delujoče strukture za usklajevanje, zlasti če je vključenih veliko zainteresiranih strani.
9) Stresses that, apart from a good financial management, it is important to have well established coordination structures, especially when many stakeholders are involved.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o razporejanju posredno merjenih storitev finančnega posredništva (PMSFP) za določitev bruto nacionalnega dohodka (BND), ki se uporablja za proračun Evropskih skupnosti in vire lastnih sredstev
on the proposal for a Council decision on the allocation of financial intermediation services indirectly measured (FISIM) for the establishment of the gross national income (GNI) used for the purposes of the European Union's budget and its own resources
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2009)0238 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2009)0238 ),
– ob upoštevanju drugega pododstavka člena 2(7) Sklepa Sveta 2000/597/ES, Euratom z dne 29. septembra 2000 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti
– having regard to Article 2(7) second subparagraph of Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources
42. in drugega pododstavka člena 2(7) Sklepa Sveta 2007/436/ES, Euratom z dne 27. junija 2007 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti
42. and Article 2(7) second subparagraph of Council Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom of 27 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities' own resources
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7‑0022/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7‑0022/2010 ),
Razporejanje posredno merjenih storitev finančnega posredništva v skladu s členom 1 se za namene Sklepa 200/597/ES, Euratom uporablja od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2006.
The allocation of financial intermediation services indirectly measured pursuant to article 1 shall apply for the purposes of decision 200/597/EC, Euratom from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2006
Razporejanje posredno merjenih storitev finančnega posredništva v skladu s členom 1 se za namene Sklepa 2007/436/ES, Euratom uporablja od 1. januarja 2007 .
The allocation of financial intermediation services indirectly measured pursuant to Article 1 shall apply for the purposes of Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom from 1 January 2007 .
Razporejanje posredno merjenih storitev finančnega posredništva v skladu s členom 1 se za namene Sklepa 2007/436/ES, Euratom uporablja od 1. januarja 2010 .
The allocation of financial intermediation services indirectly measured pursuant to Article 1 shall apply for the purposes of Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom from 1 January 2010 .
Komisija v svojem predlogu predvideva postopek za razporejanje PMSFP za določitev BND držav članic za namene proračuna Unije in njenih lastnih virov.
The proposal of the Commission envisages proceeding to the allocation of FISIM for the establishment of GNI of Member States for the purposes of the Union's budget and its own resources.
PMSFP – „posredno merjene storitve finančnega posredništva“ – so del storitev finančnih institucij, ki se ne zagotavljajo v obliki neposredne prodaje storitev s fiksno ceno, temveč z uporabo obrestne mere, ki je višja za posojila kot za depozite.
FISIM - "financial intermediation services indirectly measured"- represent a part of the production of financial institutions which is not delivered under the form of direct sales of services with a fixed price, but by means of charging a higher rate of interest for loans than the one used for deposits.
Metoda za razporejanje PMSFP v okviru sistema nacionalnih in regionalnih računov (ESA 95) je določena v evropski zakonodaji od leta 1988 in bi jo morali izvajati od leta 2005 naprej
The method for the allocation of FISIM within the system of national and regional accounts (ESA 95) has been defined in European legislation since 1998 and should have be implemented from 2005 onwards
Najprej je bila opredeljena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2223/96 z dne 25. junija 1996, ki jo je dopolnila in spremenila Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 448/1998 z dne 16. februarja 1998, izvajati pa se je začela z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1889/2002 z dne 23. oktobra 2002, v kateri je bil njen začetek izvajanja določen od 1. januarja 2005.
It was first defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 of 25 June 1996, amended and completed by Council Regulation (EC) No 448/1998 of 16 February, and it was implemented by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1889/2002 of 23 October 2002, which foresaw its implementation from 1 January 2005.
Dejansko so šele jeseni 2008 vse države članice zagotovile razporeditev PMSFP in prenos podatkov v okviru ESR 95. .
In practice, only in autumn 2008 did all Member States allocate FISIM in ESA 95 data transmission. .
Vendar je bilo od začetka predvideno, da naj bi bilo razporejanje PMSFP za določitev BND za namene proračuna Unije in njenega sistema lastnih virov odvisno od soglasne odločitve Sveta, po predlogu Komisije in mnenju Evropskega parlamenta
However, it was since the beginning foreseen that the allocation of FISIM for the establishment of GNI for purposes of the Union's budget and its system of own resources would depend on a decision by unanimity of the Council, under proposal of the Commission after the opinion of the EP
To je rezultat posebne določbe člena 8(1) omenjene Uredbe (ES) št. 448/98 in člena 2(7) sklepov o „lastnih virih“ iz leta 2000 in 2007 (razporejanje PMSFP bi v povprečju povečalo BND za več kot 1 %, kar se lahko šteje kot „pomembno povečanje BND“ v skladu s to določbo). .
This results from a specific provision in article 8(1) of regulation (EC) No 448/98 mentioned, as well as from article 2(7) of both the decisions " own resources" of 2000 and 2007 (the allocation of FISIM would increase GNI by more than 1% in average, which can be considered as "significant changes in GNI" as provided for in that provision). .
Pravzaprav se je zdelo nujno uvesti poskusno obdobje, da se oceni natančnost opredeljene metode in pravil ter preizkusi, ali bo razporeditev zares prinesla zanesljivejše rezultate za natančno merjenje zadevne gospodarske dejavnosti.
In fact, it was considered necessary to go through a period of trial in order to evaluate the accuracy of the methods and rules defined and test whether the allocation would indeed yield more reliable results for the correct measurement of the economic activity concerned.
Tako bi bila po koncu poskusnega obdobja sprejeta odločitev v skladu z zgoraj opisanim postopkom o razporejanju PMSFP za določitev BND.
At the outcome of this trail period a decision would then be taken, according to the procedure described above, concerning the allocation of FISIM for the establishment of GNI.
Komisija meni, da so rezultati poskusnega obdobja zadovoljivi, in je zato predlagala, da se nadaljuje z razporejanjem PMSFP za določitev BND.
The Commission considers that the results of that trial period are satisfactory and has thus proposed to proceed to the allocation of FISIM for the establishment of GNI.
Komisija meni, da bi moralo razporejanje stopiti v veljavo retroaktivno od 1. januarja 2005, ko je začela veljati zgoraj omenjena Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1889/2002.
The Commission considers that this allocation should be made retroactively from 1 January 2005, date of the entry into force of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1889/2002 mentioned above.
To dejansko pomeni, da bi bili obravnavani dve različni obdobji, zajeti v okvir dveh različnih sklepov o virih lastnih sredstev:
This means, in fact, that two different periods, covered by two different decisions on own resources, would be considered:
– od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2006 bi se razporejanje uporabilo za namene Sklepa 2000/597/ES, Euratom;
- from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2006, the allocation would be applied for the purposes of Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom;
– od 1. januarja 2007 bi se uporabljalo za namene Sklepa 2007/436/ES, Euratom.
- from 1 January 2007 onwards, it would apply for the purposes of Decision Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom.
Sistem, ki ga predlaga Komisija, je logičen in v skladu z različnimi ravnmi evropske zakonodaje na tem področju, zato ga lahko Parlament sprejme.
The system proposed by the Commission is logical and coherent with the different stages of the European legislation in this area, and could be accepted by Parliament.
Retroaktivno razporejanje PMSFP za določitev BND bi prispevalo k učinkovitosti podatkov in bi pozitivno vplivalo na izračun predvidenih prispevkov držav članic za lastna sredstva Skupnosti.
Indeed, the retroactive allocation of FISIM for the establishment of GNI would yield to more effective data and would have a positive impact in the calculation of Member States estimated own resources contributions.
S tem bi se spremenile tudi zgornje meje sredstev za obveznosti in plačila, predvidene v večletnem finančnem okviru.
As such, it would also modify the ceilings for commitments and payments foreseen in the multiannual financial framework.
Vendar je predlagana uporaba retroaktivnosti od 1. januarja 2005, čeprav jo je v osnovi mogoče pozdraviti, povzročila razhajanja med državami članicami, ki se ne morejo sporazumeti o natančnem obsegu retroaktivnosti tega sklepa, kar lahko sproži pravna vprašanja.
However, the proposed retroactive application from 1 January 2005, although in theory commendable, has given birth to divergences amongst Member States, which do not agree on the exact extent of the retroactivity of the decision, and could be open to legal challenges.
Zdi se, da je edini način za doseganje dogovora med vsemi državami članicami, da se ne razmišlja o nobeni retroaktivni uporabi razporejanja PMSFP.
Indeed, it seems that the only possibility for reaching an agreement between all Member States is that no retroactive application of the allocation of FISIM be considered.
Takšno razporejanje bi se potem začelo uporabljati šele z letom začetka veljavnosti sklepa, kar pomeni od 1. januarja 2010.
The allocation would then take place only from the year of the entrance into force of the decision on, which means from 1 January 2010 on.
V tem okviru poročevalec meni, da je najbolje predlagati, da se začne razporejanje PMSFP za BND uporabljati šele od 1. januarja 2010, s čimer bi se izognili sporom med državami članicami in možnim pravnim težavam.
In this context, the rapporteur considers that the best thing to do is to propose that the allocation of FISIM to the GNI starts only on the 1 January 2010, thus avoiding conflicts between Member States and possible legal challenges.
Poročevalec zato meni, da je prednostna naloga Parlamenta, da se razporejanje PMSFP začne pravilno uporabljati od leta 2010 naprej, kar bo omogočilo pripravo natančnejšega izračuna BND.
In fact, the rapporteur considers that the priority for the EP is that the allocation of FISIM be properly done from 2010 on, in order to obtain a more accurate calculation of the GNI.
o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) v letu 2008, predloženem Evropskemu parlamentu ob uporabi dela II, točke G, odstavka 43 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2008, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................19
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................20
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) v letu 2008, predloženega Evropskemu parlamentu ob uporabi dela II, točke G, odstavka 43 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006
– having regard to the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2008, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006
– ob upoštevanju Lizbonske pogodbe, ki spreminja Pogodbo o Evropski uniji in Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zlasti naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, kakor je bil spremenjen, z naslovom „Splošne določbe o zunanjepolitičnem delovanju Unije in posebne določbe o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki“,
– having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, in particular Title V of the Treaty on European Union as thus amended, entitled ‘General Provisions on the Union’s External Action and Specific Provisions on the Common Foreign and Security Policy’,
– ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije, ki jo je sprejel Evropski svet 12. decembra 2003, in poročila o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije, sprejetega 11. decembra 2008,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy (ESS) adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003 and the Report on the Implementation of the ESS adopted on 11 December 2008,
– ob upoštevanju omenjenega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju,
– having regard to the above-mentioned Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o letnih poročilih iz leta 2006 in 2007 o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki z dne 5. junija 2008
– having regard to its resolutions on the 2006 and 2007 CFSP annual reports, of 5 June 2008
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0254 . in 19. februarja 2009
Texts adopted, P6_TA (2008)0254. and 19 February 2009
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0074 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA (2009)0074. respectively,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. oktobra 2009 o institucionalnih vidikih ustanovitve evropske službe za zunanje delovanje
– having regard to its resolution of 22 October 2009 on the institutional aspects of setting up the European External Action Service
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2009)0057 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2009)0057 . ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 119(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 119(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A7-0023/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0023/2010 ),
A. ker se je vloga Evropske unije, ki jo ima kot svetovni akter, v zadnjih desetletjih povečala in ker so za skupno delovanje EU in soočanje z globalnimi izzivi na demokratičen, usklajen, dosleden in učinkovit način potrebni nov pristop in dodatna finančna sredstva,
A. whereas the role of the European Union as a global player has increased over the last decades, and whereas a new approach and further financial means are needed if the EU is to act collectively and meet global challenges in a democratic, coherent, consistent and efficient manner,
B. ker Evropska unija v odnosih s preostalim svetom nadalje razvija cilje svoje zunanje politike, podpira in spodbuja svoje vrednote in interese, prispeva k zaščiti svojih državljanov ter spodbuja te vrednote po vsem svetu, da bi tako prispevala k miru, varnosti, trajnostnemu razvoju Zemlje, solidarnosti in medsebojnemu spoštovanju med narodi, prosti in pravični trgovini, odpravi revščine in varstvu človekovih pravic, predvsem pravic otrok, kakor tudi k doslednemu spoštovanju in razvoju mednarodnega prava, vključno s spoštovanjem načel Ustanovne listine Organizacije združenih narodov, ker je spodbujanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic, še posebej univerzalnosti in nedeljivosti človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v osrčju zunanjega delovanja EU in ker je Listina o temeljnih pravicah zdaj zavezujoča za zunanje delovanje EU,
B. whereas the European Union, in its relations with the wider world, shall further develop its foreign policy objectives, uphold and promote its values and interests, contribute to the protection of its citizens and advance these values worldwide with the aim of contributing to peace, security, the sustainable development of the Earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and the protection of human rights, in particular the rights of the child, as well as the strict observance and development of international law, including respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter, whereas the promotion of human rights, in particular the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, shall be at the centre of the EU's external action and whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights is now binding on the external activities of the EU,
C. ker Lizbonska pogodba uvaja novo razsežnost zunanjega delovanja Unije kot celote, vključno s skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko, kar bi skupaj s statusom EU kot pravne osebe in zadevnimi institucionalnimi novostmi, predvsem vzpostavitvijo urada podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko ("podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica") ter oblikovanjem evropske službe za zunanje delovanje, lahko bil pomemben dejavnik pri usklajenosti, doslednosti in učinkovitosti zunanjega delovanja Unije ter bi lahko bistveno povečalo njeno sposobnost uveljavljanja na mednarodnem prizorišču;
C. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon brings a new dimension to the external action of the Union as a whole, including the CFSP, which together with the legal personality of the EU and the relevant institutional innovations, notably the creation of the office of Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the Vice-President/High Representative’) and the setting-up of the European External Action Service (EEAS), could be a decisive factor in the coherence, consistency and effectiveness of the Union's external action and could significantly enhance its shaping power in the international arena,
D. ker so potrebna dodatna prizadevanja za hitrejši odziv EU na politične krize in regionalne spore; ker lahko sedanji mehanizmi odločanja in financiranja ovirajo pravočasne in obsežne odzive in ker je treba poiskati način, na katerega bi dodatno omejili in odpravili pravilo o soglasju,
D. whereas further efforts are needed to improve the timeliness of the response of the EU to political crises and regional conflicts; whereas the present decision-making and funding mechanisms can hamper timely and comprehensive reactions and whereas ways must be found to further limit and overcome the unanimity rule,
E. ker je pravilna opredelitev skupnih evropskih interesov in delovanje v skladu z njimi bistvenega pomena za uresničitev ciljev zunanjega delovanja Unije in zlasti ciljev njene skupne zunanje in varnostne politike, ker je nujno treba zagotoviti, da so vse dogovorjene politike in sprejeti ukrepi tudi v skladu z mednarodnim pravom, vključno z načeli iz ustanovne listine OZN,
E. whereas it is essential to correctly identify, and act in accordance with, the common European interests in order to attain the objectives of the Union’s external actions and in particular those of its Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP); whereas it is essential to ensure that all policies decided and actions taken are also in accordance with international law, including the principles laid down in the UN Charter,
F. ker so spodbujanje miru, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in načel pravne države po vsem svetu osrednji cilji zunanje politike EU,
F. whereas the promotion of peace, human rights and the rule of law worldwide are the central goals of the EU’s external policies,
G. ker je po Lizbonski pogodbi podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica pooblaščena, da pomaga Svetu in Komisiji pri zagotavljanju doslednosti med različnimi področji zunanjega delovanja ter med njimi in drugimi političnimi področji Unije,
G. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon mandates the Vice-President/High Representative to assist the Council and the Commission in ensuring consistency between the different areas of external action and between these and the Union's other policy areas,
H. ker od datuma začetka veljave Lizbonske pogodbe Evropska unija prevzema vse pravice in obveznosti Evropske skupnosti, obenem pa še naprej izvršuje obstoječe pravice in obveznosti Evropske Unije,
H. whereas as from the date of entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon the European Union exercises all rights and assumes all obligations of the European Community whilst continuing to exercise existing rights and assume obligations of the EU,