natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Potrebna je preferenčna obravnava uporabnikov, če le ne služi prikrivanju poslovnih interesov na način, ki je v nasprotju s pravicami in interesi potrošnika v imenu „prevladujočega javnega interesa“.
Preferential treatment for users is necessary, provided it is not used to camouflage business interests in such a way as to infringe consumers' rights and interests in the name of an 'overriding public interest'.
Po mnenju pripravljavke mnenja bi bilo možnost izločitve poslovnih interesov treba jasneje izraziti v besedilu, saj je glavni cilj revizije pravil služiti interesom javnosti in okrepiti pravice državljanov.
Your rapporteur believes that this option of removing business interests needs to be more clearly spelt out in the text, since the primary purpose of revising the rules is to serve the interests of the public and strengthen the rights of the citizen.
Med drugim je eden od ciljev predloga uredbe razjasniti postopke v zvezi z izjemami, tj. tistimi primeri, pri katerih se pravila o preglednosti in razkrivanju ne uporabljajo.
The objectives of the proposal for a regulation include that of clarifying the procedures concerning the exceptions, i.e. those cases to which the rules on transparency and publicisation do not apply.
V besedilu so, enako kot v predhodnem besedilu, med izjemami omenjeni skupni poslovni interesi.
The text includes among these exceptions business interests, as in the previous version.
Vendar pa predlog izrecno navaja tudi okoliščine, v katerih poslovne skrivnosti ne smejo biti razkrite, dokler niso predložene v obravnavo sodišču z namenom reševanja dvostranskih sporov ali mehanizmu za reševanje sporov Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) (organu STO za reševanje sporov).
However, the proposal also specifically refers to the circumstances in which business secrets must not be divulged, i.e. until such cases have been brought before the tribunal for resolving bilateral disputes or the WTO's Dispute Settlement Mechanism.
Predlagana sprememba Komisije razjasnjuje besedilo: poslovni interes ostaja zaščiten, in sicer tudi v primerih, kjer služi kot očitna utemeljitev za zahtevke EU pri reševanju sporov pri organu za reševanje sporov STO.
The Commission's proposed modification clarifies the text: the commercial interest remains protected, including where it serves as an obvious justification for the EU's demands vis-à-vis the resolution of disputes by the WTO tribunal.
Predlog ohranja pravila, ki veljajo za zaupne dokumente, povezane s trgovinskimi pogajanji.
Otherwise, the proposal maintains the rules on confidential documents related to trade negotiations.
Dokumenti, ki jih Odbor 133, odgovoren za oblikovanje trgovinskih politik EU, posreduje drugim javnim institucijam, so občutljive narave.
Documents forwarded by the 133 Committee (responsible for defining the EU's trade policies) to the higher public authorities are by their nature sensitive.
Odbor INTA se zaveda potrebe po ohranjanju zaupnosti dokumentov, ki jih pripravlja Odbor 133, vseeno pa si pridržuje pravico do nadzora nad trgovinsko politiko, ki jo izvajata Komisija in Svet.
INTA is aware of the need to maintain the confidentiality of '133' documents, while reserving the right to monitor trade policy as implemented by the Commission and the Council.
Za takšne dokumente občutljive narave so pravila za razvrščanje ter medinstitucionalni in javni dostop opredeljena v sklepu Komisije z dne 29. novembra 2001, ki spreminja interna pravila (C(2001)3031).
For sensitive documents of this type, the rules governing classification and interinstitutional and public access are defined in the Commission's Decision of 29 November 2007 amending its internal rules (C(2001)3031).
Zadnji pregled pravil o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov, ki ga je Komisija izvedla takoj po reviziji pravil o razvrščanju dokumentov občutljive narave, sega v leto 2001.
The last time the Commission revised the rules on public access to documents was in 2001, immediately after the revision of the classification rules on sensitive documents.
Po eni strani bo tako morala Komisija, če si resnično želi izboljšati dostop javnosti do vseh vrst dokumentov, revidirati vsa svoja interna pravila.
Meanwhile, if the Commission is genuinely concerned to enhance public access to all types of document, it will have to revise all of its internal rules.
Po drugi strani mora odbor INTA vsekakor upoštevati stroga pravila za posredovanje informacij z omejenim dostopom, in sicer celo med svojimi člani.
INTA itself must certainly practise strict respect for the rules on communicating restricted-access information, even among its members.
Vendar pa gre pri tem za pravila, ki so bila izdelana leta 2001, ko ta odbor še ni obstajal.
These rules, however, date from 2001, i.e. from before the creation of the committee.
Posledično pripravljavka mnenja poudarja potrebo po rednih revizijah pravil za razvrščanje in posredovanje dokumentov občutljive narave Evropske komisije drugim institucijam, vključno z Evropskim parlamentom.
Your rapporteur accordingly stresses the need for the regular revision of the rules on the classification and transmission of sensitive Commission documents to the other institutions, Parliament included.
Ta predlog revizije pravil o dostopu javnosti se ne bi smel omejevati zgolj na formalnosti.
The present proposal for revising the rules on public access must not be allowed to remain a mere formality.
Da bi bila revizija uspešna, je treba natančno preučiti celotni postopek dostopa vsake pravne osebe ali državljana do vseh vrst dokumentov.
The whole process governing access to all types of document for all legal persons and all citizens must be examined very closely so that the revision is enabled to succeed.
Iz tega razloga predlaga pripravljavka mnenja predloge sprememb, predstavljene v nadaljevanju.
In the light of the above, your rapporteur proposes the amendments which follow.
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Člen 9 – odstavek 1
Article 9 – point 1
Dokumenti občutljive narave so dokumenti, ki izvirajo iz institucij ali njihovih agencij, iz držav članic, tretjih držav ali mednarodnih organizacij in so označeni s „TRÈS SECRET/TOP SECRET“, „SECRET“ ali „CONFIDENTIEL“ v skladu s predpisi institucije, ki ščitijo bistvene interese Evropske unije ali ene ali več njenih držav članic na področjih, zajetih v členu 4(1)(a), zlasti javni varnosti, obrambi in vojaških zadevah.
Sensitive documents are documents originating from the institutions or the agencies established by them, from Member States, third countries or International Organisations, classified as «TRÈS SECRET/TOP SECRET», «SECRET» or «CONFIDENTIEL» in accordance with the rules of the institution concerned , which protect essential interests of the European Union or of one or more of its Member States in the areas covered by Article 4(1)(a), notably public security, defence and military matters.
Dokumenti občutljive narave so dokumenti, ki izvirajo iz institucij ali njihovih agencij, iz držav članic, tretjih držav ali mednarodnih organizacij in so označeni s „TRÈS SECRET/TOP SECRET“, „SECRET“ ali „CONFIDENTIEL“ v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi , ki jih zadevna institucija pripravi in tudi redno revidira ter ki ščitijo bistvene interese Evropske unije ali ene ali več njenih držav članic na področjih, zajetih v členu 4(1)(a), zlasti javni varnosti, mednarodnih in trgovinskih odnosih, obrambi in vojaških zadevah.
Sensitive documents are documents originating from the institutions or the agencies established by them, from Member States, third countries or International Organisations, classified as «TRÈS SECRET/TOP SECRET», «SECRET» or «CONFIDENTIEL» in accordance with rules which shall be drawn up by the institution concerned and shall be reviewed by it regularly and which protect essential interests of the European Union or of one or more of its Member States in the areas covered by Article 4(1)(a), notably public security, international and trade relations, and defence and military matters.
Vsaka institucija mora pripraviti in revidirati svoja lastna pravila za ugotavljanje meril razvrščanja dokumentov v natančno opredeljenem roku.
Each institution needs to draw up and revise its own rules establishing the criteria for classifying documents, within a clearly established deadline.
Dokumenti, ki jih posreduje Odbor 133, odgovoren za oblikovanje trgovinskih politik EU, in druge javne institucije, spadajo v kategorijo dokumentov občutljive narave.
Documents forwarded to other public bodies by the 133 Committee, which is responsible for defining EU trade policy, fall within the category of sensitive documents.
Odbor INTA se zaveda potrebe po ohranjanju zaupnosti dokumentov, ki jih pripravlja Odbor 133, in si pridržuje pravico do nadzora trgovinske politike, ki jo v interesu državljanov izvajata Komisija in Svet.
INTA, while aware of the need to preserve the confidentiality of documents drawn up by that committee, reserves the right to monitor the trade policy implemented by the Commission and Council in the citizens' interest.
Člen 10 – odstavek 1
Article 10 – point 1
Stroške izdelave in pošiljanja kopij plača prosilec.
The cost of producing and sending copies shall be charged to the applicant.
Stroški ne presegajo realne cene izdelave in pošiljanja kopij.
This charge shall not exceed the real cost of producing and sending the copies.
Pregled dokumentov na kraju samem, kopije v obsegu manj kot 20 strani formata A4 in neposredni dostop v elektronski obliki ali prek registra so brezplačni.
Consultation on the spot, copies not exceeding 20 A4 pages and direct access in electronic form or through the register shall be free of charge .
Komisija želi oblikovati preprostejše postopke za dostop javnosti do dokumentov, vendar istočasno izključiti izrecno navedbo njene obveznosti izdajanja dokumentov proti plačilu, če njihovo število preseže določen obseg.
The Commission's aim is to draw up simpler procedures for public access to documents, yet it wishes to eliminate the explicit mention of its obligation to make documents available for a fee where their number exceeds a certain limit.
Ta odstavek je treba ohraniti in ga izboljšati: če je dolžnost državljana plačati za zahtevane kopije, je prav, da je državljan seznanjen s to obveznostjo in z načinom izračunavanja pristojbin za kopiranje ter da ima brezplačen dostop, kadar kopiranje dokumentov ni potrebno.
The paragraph in question needs to be detained and improved: if it is the citizen's obligation to pay for the copies requested, that same citizen should nonetheless be aware of that obligation and of the method of calculation of the fees charged for copying.
Predlog spremembe
The citizen should be able to consult documents free of charge where it is not necessary to copy them.
Člen 11 – odstavek 3
Article 11 – point 3
Institucije nemudoma sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za vzpostavitev registra, ki bo deloval od 3. junija 2002 .
The institutions shall immediately take the measures necessary to establish a register which shall be operational by 3 June 2002 .
Institucije nemudoma sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za vzpostavitev registra, ki bo deloval najkasneje v šestih mesecih od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe .
The institutions shall immediately take the measures necessary to establish a register which shall be operational no later than six months from the entry into force of this Regulation .
Za zagotovitev skladnosti je treba datum spremeniti v skladu s predlogom spremembe dokumenta in z novim koledarjem.
In the interests of consistency, the date should be altered in line with the present amendments and the new calendar.
Potreben je ambicioznejši rok od originalno predlaganega.
A more ambitious deadline is needed than that originally proposed.
Dokumenti, ko jih zadeva aktualni pregled, imajo takojšen in pomemben vpliv na državljane in družbe (v primeru trgovinske menjave in pogajanj), zato morajo institucije EU hitro ukrepati za izboljšanje storitev ter državljanom omogočati vpogled v registre čimprej po uveljavitvi nove uredbe.
The documents to which the present revision applies are such as to have an immediate and significant impact on citizens and enterprises (where trade or business are concerned), and the EU institutions must therefore act rapidly to improve the services offered and make the registers available to the public as swiftly as possible after the entry into force of the new Regulation.
Monica Frassoni ,
Monica Frassoni
V skladu s členom 1(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji morajo institucije in organi Skupnosti sprejemati odločitve čim bolj javno in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani.
According to Article 1(2) of the Treaty on European Union Community institutions and bodies must take decisions as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizens.
Preglednost in pravica državljanov do obveščenosti sta široko priznani kot stroškovno najučinkovitejši način za preprečevanje korupcije in boj proti njej.
Transparency and citizens' right to information are widely recognised as the most cost-efficient way of fighting and preventing corruption.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito sodelovanje državljanov v političnem procesu in odgovornost javnih organov, bi morali državljani imeti najširši možni dostop do dokumentov evropskih institucij.
In order to enable citizens to effectively participate in the political process and call public authorities to account, citizens should therefore have the widest possible access to documents held by the European institutions.
Evropski parlament je nenehno opozarjal na pomembnost tega temeljnega načela demokracije, na primer v resoluciji Cashman.
The European Parliament has constantly reminded the importance of this fundamental principle of democracy, as in the Cashamn Resolution.
Pri posvetovanju o reviziji uredbe je civilna družba močno podprla poziv Evropskega parlamenta k uvedbi akta o resnični svobodi informacij, ki bi veljal za institucionalni okvir Evropske unije v skladu s pravico do dobrega upravljanja, ki je določena v členu 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah.
The consultation on the revision of the Regulation, showed broad support from civil society for the call from the European Parliament for the introduction of a genuine freedom of information act applicable to the institutional framework of the European Union, in accordance with the right to good administration laid down in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Poročevalka obžaluje, da druge institucije ne upoštevajo enakega pristopa, h kateremu so se zavezale.
Your rapporteur regrets that the other Institutions are not following the same committed approach.
Dejanske spremembe, ki jih je Komisija vnesla v uredbo, so zares nezadovoljive, saj predlogi Komisije v veliko primerih predstavljajo korak nazaj pri „težnji za večjo preglednost“.
The actual amendments the Commission has brought to the Regulation are indeed disappointing as in a number of cases the Commission's proposals represent a step backwards in "a drive towards more transparency".
Poleg tega poročevalka meni, da je odločitev Komisije, da za revizijo uredbe uporabi postopek prenovitve, neprimerna in ni skladna s cilji medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o postopku prenovitve.
Furthermore, you rapporteur considers the Commission's choice to use the re-cast procedure for the revision of the regulation unfortunate and not in conformity with the objectives of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on the re-cast procedure.
Postopek prenovitve za izčrpno revizijo, kjer spremembe nekaterih elementov vplivajo na druge določbe v besedilu, je neprimeren zato, ker to v praksi pomeni, da mora Parlament obširno uporabljati odstopanje, predvideno v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu.
The unsuitability of the re-cast procedure for a complex revision, where changes in some elements have implications for other provisions in the text, in practical terms means that Parliament must make extensive use of the derogation provided for in the IIA.
Poročevalka je v več primerih ponovno vključila sedanje določbe uredbe, saj nedvomno ponujajo višji standard dostopa in preglednosti.
Your rapporteur has in several cases reinstated the current provisions f the Regulation as they offer a definitely higher standard of access and transparency.
Poročevalka je opozorila tudi na vprašanje razmerja med dostopom do dokumentov in zaščito podatkov kot enega najspornejših vprašanj glede uporabe Uredbe 1049/2001.
Your rapporteur has also referred to the question of the relationship between access to documents and data protection as one of the most controversial issue relating to the application of Regulation 1049/2001.
Skupno mnenje evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov in Sodišča prve stopnje (v zadevi Bavarian Lager) je, da varstvo podatkov ne sme biti razlog za preprečitev dostopa do informacij, kadar ni tveganja, da bi s tem kršili pravico do zasebnosti in osebne integritete posameznika, zaradi česar je poročevalka Komisijo opomnila na to skupinsko mnenje.
The shared position of the European Ombudsman, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Court of First Instance (in the Bavarian Lager case) is that data protection may not be used to prevent access to information when such access would not risk harming the right to privacy and personal integrity of an individual and your rapporteur has reminded the Commission of that consolidated position.
Izhajajoč iz mehiškega zakona o svobodi informacij in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je vložitev tožbe na evropska sodišča v primeru zavrnitve razkritja dokumentov lahko nerazumno obremenjujoča možnost za državljane, poročevalka predlaga, da bi moral biti evropski varuh človekovih pravic pooblaščen za odločanje o zahtevah za dostop do dokumentov z dokončnim učinkom na zadevno upravo, medtem ko bi morali vlagatelji obdržati pravico, da se na Sodišču prve stopnje pritožijo zoper zavrnitev razkritja.
Inspired by the Mexican Freedom of Information and bearing in mind that bringing an action before the European Courts can be an unreasonable alternative for citizens in case of refusal of disclosure of a document, your rapporteur suggests that the European Ombudsman should be empowered to take decisions on requests for access to documents with final effect on the administration concerned, while the applicants should retain the right to bring an action before the Court of First Instance against a refusal of disclosure.
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb s priloženimi priporočili svetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(1) Potrebne so številne bistvene spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije.
(1) A number of substantive changes are to be made to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba navedeno uredbo prenoviti.
In the interest of clarity, that Regulation should be recast.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba navedeno uredbo prenoviti , pri čemer je to zakonodajna tehnika, ki bi se naj uporabljala v skladu z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov 1 .
In the interests of clarity, that Regulation should be recast , this being a legislative technique which should be applied in accordance with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts 1 .
1 UL C 77, 28.3.2002, str.
1 OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
Odločitev Komisije, da bo za revizijo te uredbe uporabila postopek prenovitve, je neprimerna in ni v skladu s cilji medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o postopku prenovitve, ki predvideva njegovo uporabo pod precej drugačnimi okoliščinami.
The Commission's choice to use the re-cast procedure, for the revision of this regulation is inappropriate and not in conformity with the objectives of the Interinstitutional Agreement on the re-cast procedure, which foresees its use under quite different conditions.
(3) Javnost omogoča državljanom, da tesneje sodelujejo v postopku odločanja, in zagotavlja, da je uprava deležna večje zakonitosti ter je učinkovitejša in bolj odgovorna državljanu v demokratičnem sistemu.
(3) Openness enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system.
Javnost prispeva h krepitvi načela demokracije in spoštovanja človekovih temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, določenih v členu 6 Pogodbe EU in v Evropski listini o temeljnih pravicah.
Openness contributes to strengthening the principles of democracy and respect for fundamental rights as laid down in Article 6 of the EU Treaty and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Vsak napredek v smeri odpiranja upravnih organov za javni nadzor bo verjetno prispeval tudi k prizadevanjem za boj proti korupciji.
Any progress towards opening administrative authorities up to public scrutiny is also likely to advance anti-corruption efforts.
(5a) Posvetovanje je pokazalo, da civilna družba močno podpira poziv Evropskega parlamenta k uvedbi akta o resnični svobodi informacij, ki bi veljal za institucionalni okvir Evropske unije, v skladu s pravico do dobrega upravljanja, ki je določena v členu 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah.
(5a) That consultation has shown that there is broad support within civil society for the European Parliament's call for the introduction, in accordance with the right to good administration laid down in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, of a genuine freedom of information act applicable to the institutional framework of the European Union.
(10) Glede razkritja osebnih podatkov je treba vzpostaviti jasno razmerje med to uredbo in Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov.
(10) With regard to the disclosure of personal data, a clear relationship should be established between this Regulation and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data.
Od sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 so sodna praksa Sodišča ter odločitve in stališča, ki sta jih sprejela evropski varuh človekovih pravic in evropski varuh osebnih podatkov, razjasnile razmerje med to uredbo in Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001, v skladu s čimer se mora za zahteve za dokumente, ki vsebujejo osebne podatke, uporabljati uredba o dostopu do dokumentov ter mora uporaba izjem od pravil, ki dovoljujejo dostop do dokumentov in informacij, za namene varstva osebnih podatkov temeljiti na potrebi po zaščiti zasebnosti in integritete posameznika.
Since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 the case-law of the Court of Justice and decisions and positions adopted by the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor have clarified the relationship between that Regulation and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, to the effect that it is the regulation on access to documents which is to be applied to requests for documents containing personal data and that application of the exceptions to the rules allowing access to documents and information for the purpose of protecting personal data must be based on the need to protect the privacy and integrity of an individual.