natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
so dovoljeni le, če je to potrebno, da se doseže prenehanje ali prepoved kršitve pravil skupne ribiške politike, in organ, ki informacije sporoči, soglaša z njihovim razkritjem.
shall be permitted only if it is necessary to bring about the cessation or prohibition of an infringement of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy and the authority communicating the information consents to its disclosure.
Člen 108 – odstavek 3
Article 108 – paragraph 3
Vsaka država članica Komisiji in organu, ki ga ta imenuje, zagotovi oddaljen dostop do varnega dela svoje spletne strani.
For the secure part of its website, each Member State shall provide remote access to the Commission and the body designated by it.
Država članica odobri dostop uradnikom Komisije na podlagi elektronskih potrdil, ki jih izdela Komisija ali organ, ki ga ta imenuje.
The Member State shall grant access to Commission officials based on electronic certificates generated by the Commission or the body designated by it.
Tretje države dobijo informacije iz odstavkov 1(b), 1(d) in 1(f) za plovila Skupnosti, ki prosijo za dovoljenje za ribolov v njihovih vodah.
Third countries shall be provided with the information included in paragraphs 1(b), 1(d) and 1(f) for Community vessels that apply for licences to fish in their waters.
Informacije se posredujejo na zahtevo zadevne tretje države in takoj, pod pogojem da tretja država pisno zagotovi zaupnost teh informacij.
The information shall be provided at the request of the third country concerned and without delay, on condition that the third country guarantees in writing the confidentiality of the information.
Za prenos osebnih podatkov v skladu s to določbo se šteje, da je v skladu s členom 26(1)(d) Direktive 95/46/ES.
The transfer of personal data under this provision shall be deemed to comply with Article 26(1)(d) of Directive 95/46/EC.
Ko plovila EU zaprosijo za dovoljenje za ribolov v tretjih državah v okviru partnerskih ali zasebnih sporazumov, bi morala vlada tretje države imeti pravico do obveščenosti o določenih informacijah o teh plovilih, pod pogojem da se strinja z njihovo zaupnostjo.
When EU vessels apply for authorisations to fish in third countries, under partnership agreements or private ones, the third country government should have the right to know certain types of information about those vessels, provided they agree on the confidentiality of the data.
Člen 17 a – odstavek 1 – uvodno besedilo
Article 17a – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
Brez poseganja v izvedbena pooblastila, ki jih Pogodba podeljuje Komisiji, Agencija pomaga Komisiji pri ocenjevanju in nadziranju uporabe pravil skupne ribiške politike v državah članicah.
Without prejudice to the enforcement powers conferred by the Treaty on the Commission, the Agency shall assist the Commission for the purpose of evaluating and controlling the application of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy by the Member States.
Agencija lahko izvaja inšpekcijske preglede javnih organov in zasebnih subjektov v državah članicah.
The Agency may undertake inspections of public authorities and private operators in the Member States.
V ta namen lahko v skladu s predpisi zadevne države članice
For this purpose it may, in compliance with the legal provisions of the Member State concerned,
Agencija lahko z lastnimi sredstvi izvaja inšpekcijske preglede javnih organov in zasebnih subjektov v državah članicah.
The Agency may , using its own resources, undertake inspections of public authorities and private operators in the Member States.
Agencija bi morala v prihodnje imeti lastna sredstva, na primer dobro opremljena plovila, da bi lahko opravljala inšpekcijske preglede na podlagi pooblastil iz te uredbe.
The Agency should, at a future date, have its own resources, such as well equipped vessels, in order to undertake the inspections which the Regulation empowers it to carry out.
Eden od temeljnih stebrov skupne ribiške politike mora biti učinkovito in nediskriminatorno izvajanje pravil.
Effective and non-discriminatory implementation of the rules must be one of the fundamental pillars of the Common Fisheries Policy.
S spoštovanjem pravil in celovitim pristopom k nadzoru se na najboljši način dolgoročno zaščiti interese ribiškega sektorja.
Respect for the rules and a coherent approach to control is the best way to protect the interests of the fishing sector in the long term.
Če udeleženi v ribištvu, od tistih na ladjah do tistih, ki ribe prodajajo potrošnikom, ne spoštujejo pravil, je politika obsojena na neuspeh.
If those involved in fisheries, from the people on the boats to those who sell the fish to consumers, do not respect the rules, the Policy is doomed to fail.
Staleži rib bodo izginili skupaj s tistimi, ki so od njih odvisni.
Fish stocks will disappear, along with those who depend upon them.
Komisija in Parlament vedno znova obžalujeta nizko raven skladnosti in pozivata k boljšemu nadzoru v državah članicah, usklajenim merilom inšpekcijskih pregledov in kazni, preglednosti rezultatov inšpekcijskih pregledov, krepitvi sistema Skupnosti za inšpekcijske preglede itd.
Both the Commission and the European Parliament have repeatedly regretted the poor level of compliance and called for better controls by Member States, harmonized inspection criteria and penalties, transparency of the results of inspections, strengthening the system of Community inspections, etc.
Za primer glej resolucije EP z dne 6. septembra 2006 ( A6-0228/2006 , Morillon), 23. oktobra 2003 ( A5-0331/2003 , Figueiredo), 4. julija 2002 ( A5-0228/2002 , Attwooll), 17. januarja 2002 ( A5-0470/2001 , Miguélez Ramos) in 6. novembra 1997 ( A4-0298/1997 , Fraga Estévez).
For instance see the EP resolutions of 06.09.2006 ( A6-0228/2006 , Morillon), of 23.10.2003 ( A5-0331/2003 , Figueiredo), of 04.07.2002 ( A5-0228/2002 ,Attwooll), of 17.01.2002 ( A5-0470/2001 , Miguelez Ramos) and of 06.11.1997 ( A4-0298/1997 , Fraga Estevez).
Pravila se usklajujejo na ravni EU, izvajanje in uveljavljanje teh pravil pa je v pristojnosti držav članic, torej je veliko možnih razlogov za nepravilnosti pri njihovem izvajanju.
The rules are agreed at the EU level but implementation and enforcement are the responsibility of the Member States, so there are several possible reasons for a failure to properly apply them.
Prvi je pravni razlog, v smislu, da so ureditev nadzora in s tem povezani instrumenti nezadostni in inšpektorjem ne zagotavljajo ustreznih pravnih pooblastil, da bi opravili svoje delo.
The first is juridical, in the sense that the control regulation and related instruments are insufficient, and do not provide the proper legal authority for inspectors to do their jobs.
Drugi razlog je politični – ali države članice izpolnjujejo svoje pravne obveznosti in popolnoma upoštevajo pravila, o katerih so se dogovorile v Svetu, in zato namenijo zadostna sredstva?
Another is political - do the Member States fulfil their legal obligations to fully implement the rules they have agreed to at Council and allocate sufficient resources to do so?
Ali Komisija ustrezno preverja, kaj počnejo države članice?
Does the Commission properly verify what the Member States do?
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da tudi Komisija ni izpolnila svojih obveznosti, ker je od leta 1993 predlagala le nekaj izvedbenih predpisov, veljavna uredba pa jih je zahtevala več kot 20.
It should also be noted that the Commission has failed in its responsibilities as well, for the current regulation called for over 20 implementing regulations, of which the Commission has proposed only a very few since 1993.
Računsko sodišče je v posebnem poročilu iz leta 2007
The 2007 Special Report of the Court of Auditors
Posebno poročilo št. 7/2007 o sistemih nadzora, inšpekcijskih pregledov in kazni v zvezi s pravili za ohranjanje ribolovnih virov Skupnosti. preučilo vprašanje izvajanja enega od vidikov skupne ribiške politike (pravila o ohranjanju virov) in ugotovilo, da obstajajo resne težave:
Special Report 7/2007 on the control, inspection and sanction systems relating to the rules on conservation of Community fisheries resources. examined the question of implementation of one aspect of the CFP (the rules on conservation of resources) and concluded that serious problems existed:
Delo Računskega sodišča je pokazalo, da mehanizmi nadzora, inšpekcijskih pregledov in kazni kljub nedavnim izboljšavam ne morejo zagotavljati dejanske uporabe pravil o upravljanju ribolovnih virov in predvsem sistema celotnih dovoljenih ulovov in kvot.
In all, the Court's work has shown that, despite recent improvements, the control, inspection and sanction mechanisms in place are not capable of ensuring that the rules on managing the fisheries resources, and the TAC and quota system in particular, are effectively applied.
Sodišče je podalo veliko dobrih predlogov za izboljšanje razmer, Komisija pa je v enaki meri obljubila, da se bo s težavo spopadla v okviru pregleda uredbe o nadzoru.
The Court made a great many recommendations to improve the situation and the Commission made an equal number of promises to deal with the problem in the recast of the control regulation.
To poročilo obravnava predlog za takšno uredbo.
The proposal for such a regulation is the subject of the present report.
Nova uredba bo zadnja od treh uredb, ki bodo sestavljale sistem nadzora po sprejetju uredbe o nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu
The new regulation is to be the final of three regulations that will constitute the control system, after the adoption of the IUU regulation
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1005/2008 z dne 29. septembra 2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje. in uredbe o ribolovnih dovoljenjih
Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. and the regulation on fishing authorisations
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1006/2008 z dne 29. septembra 2008 o dovoljenjih za ribolovne dejavnosti ribiških plovil Skupnosti zunaj voda Skupnosti in dostopu plovil tretjih držav do voda Skupnosti. .
Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008 of 29 September 2008 concerning authorisations for fishing activities of Community fishing vessels outside Community waters and the access of third country vessels to Community waters. .
Pomembno je, da ukrepi, ki so vključeni v predlog, ne vključujejo samo vseh potrebnih vidikov obstoječe uredbe o nadzoru in priporočil Računskega sodišča, ampak da so tudi skladni z določbami teh dveh ostalih uredb.
It is essential that the measures included in the proposal not only incorporate all the necessary aspects of the existing control regulation and the recommendations of the Court of Auditors, but also that they are coherent with the provisions of these two other regulations.
Verjetno najpomembnejša kakovost nadzornega sistema, ki velja za 27 držav članic, je enako obravnavanje vseh, da nihče, ki je vključen v proizvodno verigo – ribiči, predelovalci, kupci in drugi – ne občuti diskriminacije in vsi nosijo svoj delež odgovornosti.
Probably the most important quality of a control system that applies to 27 Member States is that everybody be treated equally, that all those involved in the chain of production - fishermen, processers, buyers and others - feel that they are not discriminated against and carry their share of responsibility.
V celotni Skupnosti in v celotni proizvodni verigi je treba vzpostaviti t.i. enake pogoje delovanja.
The so-called "level playing field" must be created across the entire Community and along the entire chain of custody.
Predlog vsebuje številne vidike, ki gredo precej v to smer, kar je treba pozdraviti.
The proposal includes a number of aspects that would move quite some distance in this direction, which should be welcomed.
Zlasti pomembno vlogo v zvezi s tem bo imela Agencija Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva, saj gre za agencijo Skupnosti, ki mora biti nepristranska.
The Community Fisheries Control Agency has a particularly important role to play in this regard, given its Community nature and mandate for impartiality.
Po splošni oceni mora Komisija zagotoviti, da so vsa pravila praktična, izvedljiva in učinkovita, saj postaja sistem nadzora čedalje bolj zapleten.
As a general remark, since the control regime in the EU is becoming more complex, the Commission must ensure that all of the rules are practical, applicable and efficient.
Proučiti je treba vrsto testnih primerov z oprijemljivimi študijami primerov, ki temeljijo na dejanskih okoliščinah nadzorovanja, da se preizkusi učinkovitost predlaganih ukrepov.
A series of "test cases" should be examined using concrete case studies based on actual examples of control situations to test the efficacy of the proposed measures.
To je treba opraviti preden Svet sprejme uredbo o nadzoru, Komisijo pa bi te študije morale usmerjati, ko bo predlagala izvedbene predpise, ki so potrebni za vse tri dele sistema nadzora.
This should be done before the control regulation is adopted by Council and should guide the Commission when it proposes the implementing regulations that all three parts of the control system require.
Tako bi bilo mogoče opozoriti na morebitne težave, kar pa bi pripomoglo, da se te rešijo pred sprejetjem teh delov zakonodaje.
Such an exercise could highlight potential difficulties and help resolve them before these pieces of legislation are adopted.
Večji del predloga obsega ukrepe, ki so v uredbi že nekaj let, vendar si nekateri elementi zaslužijo obravnavo.
Much of the proposal comprises measures that have been in the regulation for years, but certain new elements merit consideration.
Rekreacijski ribolov se je zelo razširil v medijih in je predmet vseh razprav glede predloga.
Recreational Fishing - This has exploded in the media and dominates all discussion on the proposal.
Iz besedila ni razvidno, kaj Komisija predlaga.
What the Commission is proposing is not clear from the text.
Jasno pa je, da je v nekaterih primerih rekreacijski ribolov zelo obsežen in lahko znatno vpliva na staleže rib.
What is clear is that, in certain instances, recreational fisheries can be large and have significant impact on fish stocks.
Na primer po podatkih držav članic francoski rekreacijski ribiči ulovijo 5 milijard ton brancinov, nemški rekreacijski ulov pa znaša do 5,2 milijardi ton trsk iz Baltskega morja.
For example, according to data from the Member States, French sport fishermen catch 5.000 mt of sea bass, German recreational catches amount to up to 5.200 mt of cod in the Baltic Sea.
Rekreacijski ulov modroplavutega tuna je tako velik, da je mednarodna komisija za ohranitev tuna v Atlantiku sprejela upravljalne ukrepe, s katerimi ga bo nadzirala.
Recreational catches of bluefin tuna are so serious that the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna (ICCAT) has adopted management measures to control them.
Ali je pravično do komercialnih ribičev, da se rekreacijskim ribičem dopušča ribolov brez kakršnega koli nadzora?
Is it fair to commercial fishermen to continue to allow recreational fishermen to fish with no controls whatsoever?
Zato se predlaga predlog spremembe, s katerim se področje uredbe omeji na nekomercialni ribolov, ki se izvaja z ladij (ne z obale) v morskih vodah (ne v celinskih vodah).
An amendment is proposed here that would limit the scope of the regulation to non-commercial fishing conducted from boats (i.e. not from shore) in marine waters (i.e. not inland waters).
Države članice bi imele čas, da ocenijo vpliv takšnega ribolova na staleže in predlagajo sredstva za njegovo spremljanje v primerih, ko je ta vpliv znaten.
Member States would have time to evaluate the impact of such fishing on stocks and, in cases where it is having a significant impact, to propose a means of monitoring it.
Navsezadnje bi bilo treba ves ulov upoštevati v nacionalnih kvotah, saj je diskriminatorno, da za komercialni ribolov veljajo omejitve ulova, medtem ko lahko rekreacijski ribiči lovijo brez omejitve.
Since it is discriminatory to subject commercial fishermen to catch limitations and other restrictions but to allow non-commercial fishermen to fish without limit, all catches should ultimately come under the national quota.
Agencija Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva – Agencija deluje šele nekaj let, vendar se je s številnimi programi skupne uporabe že izkazala pri izboljšanju usklajenosti morskega nadzora med državami članicam.
Community Fisheries Control Agency - The Agency has only been operational for a few years but it has already proven its value in improving coordination of controls at sea among Member States during several Joint Deployment Programmes.
Komisija predlaga večjo vlogo agencije na različnih področjih, kot je razvoj osnovnega učnega načrta za programe usposabljanja, pomoč pri razvoju skupnih postopkov inšpekcijskega nadzora, izboljšanje sporočanja in izmenjave informacij med državami članicami itd.
The Commission proposes increasing the role of the Agency in various areas, such as developing core curricula for training programmes, assisting to develop common inspection procedures, improving communication and information exchange among Member States, etc.
Agencija mora imeti pomembno vlogo pri zmanjšanju in morda tudi pri odpravi prepričanja mnogih, da se jih strožje nadzoruje kot njihove sosede.
The Agency has a crucial role to play in reducing and, hopefully, eliminating the conviction on the part of many that they are controlled more strictly than their neighbours.
Razširjeni mandat agencije je pomembna sestavina izboljšanega nadzornega sistema.
The Agency's expanded mandate is an important component of an improved control system.
Parlament je v poročilu Elspeth Attwooll iz leta 2005
The Attwooll report of 2005
Poročilo Attwooll A6-0022/2005 o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi Agencije Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva, resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. februarja 2005. pozdravil ustanovitev agencije in že takrat pozval k njeni močnejši vlogi.
Attwooll report A6-0022/2005 on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Community Fisheries Control Agency, EP resolution of 23.02.2005. welcomed the Agency when it was created and even then, urged that it be given a stronger role.
Analiza tveganja – Računsko sodišče zlasti priporoča, da države članice vzpostavijo strategijo nadzora na podlagi analize tveganja, ki jo je treba vključiti v uredbo o nadzoru
Risk Analysis - An important recommendation from the Court of Auditors was that Member States establish "a control strategy based on a risk analysis", to be included in the control regulation
Glej Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča 7/2007, odstavka 129 in 130. .
See Court of Auditors Special Report 7/2007, paragraphs 129 and 130. .
Mnenje Sodišča je naslednje:
The Court considered that
Dobro poznavanje različnih ribolovnih dejavnosti, vpletenih akterjev, ugotovljenih kršitev in kazni, izrečenih v preteklosti, je nujno potrebno za pripravo dobre analize tveganja, določitev ustrezne inšpekcijske strategije in pripravo ustreznega programa.
Sound knowledge of the various fishery activities, the actors involved, infringements found and penalties imposed in the past is essential for the establishment of sound risk analysis, the definition of a suitable control strategy and the preparation of a relevant programme.
S pristopom z analizo tveganja k načrtovanju bi se opredelile prednostne naloge inšpekcijskih pregledov in pomagalo razporediti sredstva, s čimer bi bile dejavnosti nadzora učinkovitejše.
A risk analysis approach to planning would identify inspection priorities and aid the allocation of resources, making control activities more effective.
Komisija je ta priporočila upoštevala in vključila številne ukrepe, s katerimi se državam članicam zagotovi potrebne strukture, vključno z bazo podatkov o ulovu, inšpekcijskih pregledih in drugimi informacijami, postopki za preverjanje podatkov itd.
The Commission took this recommendation on board and has included a number of measures that would provide Member States with the necessary structures, including databases on catches, inspections and other information, procedures for data verification, etc.
Države članice si lahko nekatere od teh podatkov delijo, da spodbujajo tekočo izmenjavo informacij, kar bo pripomoglo k vzpostavitvi skupne podlage za analizo tveganja.
Certain of these could be shared among the Member States, in order to promote the fluid exchange of information that would help them establish a common basis for their risk analysis.
Obseg izmenjave informacij o zadevah, kot so kršitve, ki so predmet preiskave, je treba podrobno preučiti, da se zagotovita zaupnost in pravica do zasebnosti.
The extent to which information on matters such as infractions under investigation is exchanged merits careful consideration, in order to ensure confidentiality and the right to privacy.
V skupni politiki, kot je ribištvo, kjer je prost ribolov z ladjami v vseh vodah Skupnosti, pa države članice jasno potrebujejo dostop do ustreznih informacij, da bi bili njihovi programi nadzora čimbolj uspešni in učinkoviti.
In a common policy such as fisheries, though, where vessels are free to fish throughout the waters of the Community, Member States have a clear need for access to relevant information in order to make their control programmes as effective and efficient as possible.
Agencija bi lahko imela vlogo pri strukturiranju in organiziranju takšne analize in izmenjave informacij, vključno z vprašanjem, kako dolgo bi lahko bila takšna informacija dostopna.
The Agency could have a role in structuring and organizing such information analysis and exchange, including the question of how long such information should be available.
Stroški in administrativne obremenitve – Mnogo držav članic skrbi, da bi se s predlogom povečali stroški njihovih nadzornih programov in bi se od njih zahtevalo, da vzpostavijo nov zapleten administrativni sistem.
Costs and Administrative Burden - Many Member States are worried that the proposal would increase the costs of their control programmes and require them to set up complicated new administrative systems.
Po podatkih Komisije so stroški inšpekcijskih pregledov na morju desetkrat višji od inšpekcijskih pregledov na kopnem (7.552 EUR na morju, 306 EUR na kopnem, 541 EUR na trgu).
According to data from the Commission, an inspection at sea costs over ten times as much as those on land (€7.552 at sea, €306 on land, €541 in the marketplace).
Ti podatki kažejo, da je treba nadzor optimalno usmerjati.
These data point out the necessity of optimal targeting of controls.
Inšpekcijski pregledi na morju morajo ostati temeljni vidik nadzornega sistema, saj je mogoče samo tako preveriti, kaj se na morju dogaja, da se gre tja.
Inspections at sea must remain a fundamental aspect of the control system, for going to sea is the only way to verify what is happening there.
Uporaba pristopa analize tveganja, kakor je vključena v predlog, omogoča državam članicam, da zmanjšajo število inšpekcijskih pregledov na morju, saj so ti bolje usmerjeni in učinkovitejši.
Use of a risk analysis approach, though, as included in the proposal, would allow Member States to reduce their at-sea inspections while making them better targeted and more effective.
V predlog so vključene mnoge sodobne tehnologije, ki omogočajo znatno znižanje stroškov, kot so elektronski sistemi, s katerimi se lahko hitro in enostavno navzkrižno preveri podatke, ne da bi jih bilo treba ročno primerjati.
The proposal includes many modern technologies that allow significant reductions of cost, such as electronic systems that allow rapid and easy cross-verification of data, avoiding the need for manual comparisons.
Inšpekcijski pregledi na morju – S predlogom lahko države članice izvajajo inšpekcijske preglede tudi v vodah drugih držav članic.
Inspections at Sea - The proposal expands the ability of Member States to conduct inspections in each others' waters.
V nekaterih regionalnih organizacijah za upravljanje ribištva, katerih članica je Skupnost, že obstajajo takšni medsebojni inšpekcijski postopki.
Such mutual inspection procedures already exist in some Regional Fisheries Management Organisations of which the Community is a member.