natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Z evropsko zakonodajo sta urejena le cestni in železniški prevoz nevarnega blaga, ni pa še evropskih pravil za prevoz nevarnega blaga po celinskih plovnih poteh.
The EU legislation governs only road and rail transport of dangerous goods – there are not yet EU rules for transport of dangerous goods by inland waterways.
S tem predlogom naj bi države članice mednarodne cilje sporazumov ADR, RID in ADN vnesle v nacionalna pravila, ki urejajo prevoz.
The present Proposal is aiming at introducing international objectives of ADR, RID and ADN into national transport by the EU Member States.
Nekatere rešitve, ki temeljijo na priporočilih OZN, bodo v predlogu posodobljene.
Some of solutions based on the UN Recommendations will be updated in the Proposal.
Izvajati se bo začela prometna politika o prehodu na druge vrste prevoza (Bela knjiga z naslovom "Evropska prometna politika do leta 2010: čas za odločitev" KOM(2001)370), stroški, zlasti za multimodalne prevoznike, pa se bodo zmanjšali.
Transport policy of modal shift [White paper “European Transport Policy up to 2010: time to decide” (COM(2001)370)] will be enforced, costs, especially for multimodal operators, will be reduced.
Predvsem se ta pripomba nanaša na ustreznost besedišča (odstopanja namesto določb) in uskladitev časovnega obdobja z dvoletnim obdobjem spreminjanja sporazumov ADR, RID in ADN.
It concerns mainly correspondence of wording (derogations instead of provisions) and harmonisation of changing time period with 2-Year-Rythm of amendments to ADR, RID and ADN.
o predlogu sklepa Sveta in Komisije o sklenitvi Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Armenijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council and Commission decision on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta in Komisije ( KOM(2007)0113 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council and Commission decision ( COM(2007)0113 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 44(2), zadnjega stavka člena 47(2), členov 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a in zadnjega stavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard Article 44(2), Article 47(2), last sentence, Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a and Article 300(2), last sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju drugega odstavka člena 101 Pogodbe ESAE,
– having regard to Article 101, second paragraph, of the EAEC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300 (3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0161/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0161/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6‑0254/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0254/2007 ),
Sklenitev protokola k sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med ES in Armenijo zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
Conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Armenia, to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
o predlogu sklepa Sveta in Komisije o sklenitvi Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Azerbajdžansko republiko na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council and Commission decision on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Azerbaijan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta in Komisije ( KOM(2007)0114 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council and Commission decision ( COM(2007)0114 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 44(2), zadnjega stavka člena 47(2), člena 55, člena 57(2), člena 71, člena 80(2) ter členov 93, 94, 133, 181a in drugega stavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 44(2), Article 47(2), last sentence, and Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a and Article 300(2), second sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju drugega odstavka člena 101 Pogodbe o ESAE,
– having regard to Article 101, second paragraph, of the EAEC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega odstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0160/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3) first paragraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0160/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0255/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0255/2007 ),
Sklenitev protokola k sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med ES in Azerbajdžanom zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
Conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Azerbaijan to take account of the accession of the Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta in Komisije o sklenitvi protokola k sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council and Commission decision on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0098 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0098 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 44(2), zadnjega stavka člena 47(2), členov 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a in drugega stavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard Article 44(2), Article 47(2), last sentence, Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a, and Article 300(2), second sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0162/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0162/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0256/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0256/2007 ),
Sklenitev protokola k sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med ES in Gruzijo zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
Conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Georgia, to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
o skupnem besedilu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti („Rim II“), ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (“Rome II”)
–– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3619/2007 – C6 0142/2007),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3619/2007 – C6‑0142/2007 ),
371. predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0427 )
371. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0427 )
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0083 )
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0083 )
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča ob drugi obravnavi
– having regard to its position at second reading
Sprejeta besedila, 18.1.2007 , P6_TA(2007)0006 . skupnega stališča Sveta
Texts Adopted ,18.1.2007, P6_TA(2007)0006 . on the Council common position
UL C 289 E, 28.11.2006, str.
OJ C 289 E, 28.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah Evropskega parlamenta, predlaganih k skupnemu stališču ( KOM(2007)0126 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2007)0126 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 65 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 65 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6-0257/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0257/2007 ),
3. naroči svojemu generalnemu sekretarju, naj podpiše akt, po tem ko je bilo preverjeno, da so bili vsi postopki pravilno zaključeni, ter naj, v dogovoru z generalnim sekretarjem Sveta, poskrbi za njegovo objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;
Uredba o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti („Rim II“) poskuša uskladiti kolizijska pravila v državah članicah, ki določajo pravo, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti (škodna dejanja ali prekrški, povezani na primer s prometnimi nesrečami, odgovornostjo za proizvode, nelojalno konkurenco, okoljsko škodo).
The Regulation on the Law Applicable on Non-Contractual Obligations ("Rome II") seeks to harmonise the Members States' rules of conflict of laws , which determine the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (torts or delicts in relation, for instance, with traffic accidents, product liability, unfair competition, environmental damage).
Uredba kot instrument mednarodnega zasebnega prava ne usklajuje materialnega prava držav članic, ampak njihova kolizijska pravila.
As an instrument of the Private International Law the Regulation does not harmonise the Member States' substantive law, but their conflict of law rules.
Kolizijska pravila določajo, katero nacionalno pravo se uporablja za čezmejne spore, vendar ne odločajo o vsebini določene zadeve.
Conflict of law rules determine the applicable national law on cross-border disputes, but do not decide a case in substance.
Ta tehnika je še posebej koristna, saj zagotavlja uporabo istega nacionalnega prava v podobnih zadevah, ne glede na to, pred katerim nacionalnim sodiščem poteka določen postopek, in s tem povečuje pravno varnost posameznikov in gospodarskih subjektov, vpletenih v čezmejne spore, ter preprečuje izbiranje najugodnejšega pravnega reda ( forum shopping ), istočasno pa ohranja avtonomijo nacionalnega prava.
This technique is particularly advantageous as it secures application of the same national law in similar cases, irrespective of which national court ("forum") deals with the specific case, thus increasing legal certainty for individuals and economic operators involved in cross-border disputes and avoiding "forum shopping", while at the same time preserving the autonomy of national law.
Mednarodna pristojnost, priznanje in izvršba sodnih odločb so obravnavane v uredbi „Bruselj I“, ki se uporablja tako za pogodbene kot tudi za nepogodbene obveznosti.
International jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments are dealt with by the "Brussels I" Regulation, which applies to both contractual and non-contractual obligations.
Za določanje prava, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti, pa doslej ni bilo usklajenih pravil, ki bi veljala po vsej EU.
However, until now there were no EU-wide harmonised rules for determining the law applicable to non-contractual obligations.
Uredba „Rim II“ naj bi zapolnila to vrzel.
The "Rome II" Regulation is intended to fill this gap.
Postopek soodločanja in spravni postopek
The codecision and conciliation procedure
Komisija je 22. julija 2003 predstavila predlog uredbe o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti.
The Commission submitted on 22 July 2003 a proposal for a Regulation on the Law Applicable on Non-Contractual Obligations.
Po prvi obravnavi v Parlamentu 6. julija 2005 (sprejetih je bilo 54 predlogov sprememb) je Svet sprejel svoje skupno stališče 25. septembra 2006.
Following Parliament's first reading on 6 July 2005 (54 amendments adopted) the Council adopted its common position on 25 September 2006.
Parlament je potem 18. januarja 2007 zaključil drugo obravnavo in sprejel 19 predlogov sprememb skupnega stališča Sveta.
Parliament then concluded its second reading on 18 January 2007 adopting 19 amendments to the Council's common position.
Razprava je potekala predvsem o vprašanjih kršenja osebnih pravic („obrekovanja“); nesreč v cestnem prometu; nelojalne konkurence; opredelitve „okoljske škode“; razmerja do drugih pravnih instrumentov Skupnosti; obravnavanja tujega prava; klavzule o pregledu.
The main issues at stake were: violation of personality rights ("defamation"); road traffic accidents; unfair competition; the definition of "environmental damage"; the relationship with other Community instruments; the treatment of foreign law; the review clause.
Svet je s pismom z dne 19. aprila 2007 sporočil, da ne more sprejeti vseh predlogov sprememb parlamenta in da je potreben spravni postopek.
The Council informed with letter from 19 April 2007 that it could not accept all of Parliament's amendments and that conciliation was necessary.
Spravni postopek se je uradno začel 15. maja 2007.
Conciliation was then formally opened on 15 May 2007.
Ustanovna seja delegacije Parlamenta je bila 15. februarja 2007 v Strasbourgu.
The Parliament Delegation held its constituent meeting on 15 February 2007 in Strasbourg.
Delegacija je mandat za pogajanja s Svetom podelila podpredsednici parlamenta in predsednici delegacije Mechtild Rothe, predsedniku Odbora za pravne zadeve Giuseppeju Garganiju in poročevalki Diani Wallis.
Ms Rothe, Vice-President and Chair of the Delegation, Mr Gargani, Chair of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Ms Wallis, rapporteur, were given a mandate by the Delegation to negotiate with the Council.
Po več urah razprav je bil opolnoči dosežen celovit dogovor.
After several hours of deliberations an overall agreement was reached at midnight.
Delegacija EP ga je soglasno podprla s 17 glasovi za.
It was unanimously confirmed by the EP Delegation with 17 votes in favour.
Poglavitne vidike doseženega dogovora je mogoče povzeti v naslednjih točkah:
The main points of the agreement reached can be summarised as follows:
Nesreče v cestnem prometu
Road traffic accidents
Splošno pravilo, ki ga uvaja „Rim II“, je lex loci delicti po katerem se uporablja pravo države, v kateri škoda nastane.
The general rule introduced by "Rome II" is the " lex loci delicti" whereby the law applicable is the law of the country in which the damage occurs.
V primeru čezmejnih nesreč v cestnem prometu lahko to široko sprejeto pravilo pripelje do nezadovoljstva zaradi zelo različnih ravni odškodnin, ki jih dodelijo nacionalna sodišča: če žrtev nesreče prebiva v državi, ki ni država, v kateri je prišlo do nesreče, je treba znesek dodeljene odškodnine izračunati v skladu z zakonodajo in standardi države, v kateri je prišlo do nesreče, in ne države prebivališča žrtve, v kateri pa bo morala ta okrevati od poškodb in morebiti tudi živeti s posledicami nesreče.
In the case of cross-border road traffic accidents this broadly accepted rule can lead to unsatisfactory situations due to the widely differing levels of compensation awarded by national courts: when the victim of the accident is resident in another country than the one in which the accident occurred, the amount of the compensation to be awarded will have to be calculated according to the law and standards of the country of the accident and not the country of the residence of the victim, in which however he or she will have to recover from the injuries and possibly also live with the consequences of the accident.
Ena od poglavitnih prednostnih nalog delegacije EP je bila torej zagotoviti, da pristojno sodišče pri odločanju o ravni odškodnine, ki se dodeli, upošteva dejanske okoliščine posamezne žrtve.
One of the EP Delegation's main priorities was therefore to ensure that the individual victim's actual circumstances are taken into consideration by the court seized when deciding on the level of the compensation to be awarded.
Kratkoročno je delegaciji EP uspelo v uvodne izjave uredbe vključiti navedbo, po kateri sodniki pri količinskem določanju osebnih poškodb upoštevajo vse pomembne dejanske okoliščine določene žrtve, kamor še zlasti sodijo dejanske izgube ter stroški nadaljnje nege in zdravniške oskrbe.
For the short term, the EP Delegation succeeded in including a reference in the recitals of the Regulation whereby judges when quantifying personal injuries will take account of all relevant actual circumstances of the specific victim, including in particular the actual losses and cost of after-care and medical attention.
Dolgoročno je delegaciji EP uspelo zagotoviti javno zavezo Komisije za pripravo podrobne študije o vseh možnostih, vključno z zavarovalniškimi vidiki, povezanih s posebnimi težavami, s katerimi so soočene žrtve čezmejnih nesreč v cestnem prometu.
For the long term, the EP Delegation succeeded in securing a public commitment by the Commission for a detailed study on all options, including insurance aspects, on the specific problems faced by victims of cross-border road traffic accidents.
Študija bo predstavljena najpozneje do leta 2008 in bo služila kot priprava za zeleno knjigo.
The study will be presented by 2008 the latest and would pave the way for a Green Paper.
Predvideva se, da bodo izsledki te študije Komisijo in države članice pripeljali do sklepa, daje na tem področju potrebna posebna zakonodaja.
It is expected that the findings of the study will make the Commission and Member States realise the need for specific legislation in this field.
Zaradi vztrajanja delegacije EP je Svet pristal na predlog Komisije o posebnem pravilu o nelojalni konkurenci, ki spoštuje pravilo uporabe enega nacionalnega prava (pomembna točka za sodnike in odvetnike), medtem ko sočasno v veliki meri omejuje nevarnost, da bi prišlo do izbiranja najugodnejšega pravnega reda ( forum shopping oz. možnosti, da bi oškodovanci sprožili sodni postopek v državi članici, ki bi jo sami izbrali).
On the EP Delegation's insistence the Council agreed to the Commission's proposal for a specific rule on unfair competition that respects the principle of the application of one single national law (an important point for judges and lawyers) while at the same time limiting to a large extent the danger of "forum shopping" (the possibility for plaintiffs to raise their law suit in the Member State of their choice).
Delegaciji EP je uspelo doseči opredelitev „okoljske škode“ – izraza, ki se v skupnem stališču uporablja, vendar tam ni opredeljen.
The EP Delegation succeeded in obtaining a definition on "environmental damage" - a term used but not defined in the common position.
Opredelitev je v skladu z drugimi instrumenti EU, kot je direktiva o okoljski odgovornosti.
The definition is in line with other EU instruments, such as the Directive on Environmental Liability.
Kršitev osebnih pravic („obrekovanje“)
Violation of personal rights ("defamation")
V luči celovitega kompromisa je morala delegacija EP umakniti svoje predloge sprememb o vključitvi pravil o kršenju osebnih pravic, zlasti obrekovanju v medijih.
In view of an overall compromise the EP Delegation had to withdraw its amendments on the inclusion of rules on the violation of personal rights, particularly defamation in the press.
Čeprav je Parlamentu uspelo preseči nacionalne razlike in raznovrstna navzkrižja interesov ter z veliko večino sprejeti svoje predloge sprememb, se države članice prav do konca niso uspele dogovoriti o skupnem pristopu.
Though Parliament managed to overcome the national differences and various conflicts of interests and to adopt its amendments by a large majority, the Member States were unable until the very end to agree on a common approach.
Vendar se vprašanje obravnava kot „ostanek“: Komisija bo kot del pregleda uredbe do leta 2008 pripravila študijo o razmerah na tem posebne področju.
The issue however is considered as a "left-over": as part of the review of the Regulation the Commission will draw up a study by 2008 on the situation in this specific field.
Izsledki študije lahko služijo kot podlaga za sprejetje ustreznih pravil v poznejši fazi.
The findings of the study can serve as a basis for the adoption of relevant rules at a later stage.
Razmerje do drugih pravnih instrumentov Skupnosti
Relationship with other Community instruments
Glede spornega vprašanja razmerja med uredbo „Rim II“ in drugimi določbami iz zakonodaje Skupnosti je bil dosežen dogovor, da uporaba določb o uporabi prava, ki jo določajo pravila te uredbe, ne bi smela omejevati prostega pretoka blaga in storitev, kot ga urejajo instrumenti skupnosti, kot je na primer direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju.
On the controversial issue of the relationship between the "Rome II" Regulation and other provisions of Community law it was agreed that the application of provisions of the applicable law designated by the rules of this Regulation should not restrict the free movement of goods and services as regulated by Community instruments such as the e-Commerce Directive.
Obravnavanja tujega prava
Treatment of foreign law
Vprašanje, kako nacionalna sodišča obravnavajo tuje pravo – zlasti, kako pogosto in kako dobro nacionalna sodišča uporabljajo pravo druge države – se tudi reši na podlagi podrobne študije, ki jo opravi Komisija kot del svojega poročila o uporabi uredbe.
The issue of the treatment of foreign law by national courts - especially how often and how well national courts apply the law of another country - is also settled on the basis of a detailed study to be carried out by the Commission as part of its report on the application of the Regulation.
Komisija v izjavi za javnost napove tudi, da bo to študijo objavila najpozneje štiri leta po začetku veljavnosti uredbe in v vsakem primeru takoj ko bo študija na voljo, izrazi pa tudi svojo pripravljenost, da po potrebi sprejme ustrezne ukrepe.
In a public statement, the Commission also declares that it will publish this study at the latest four years after the entry into force of the Regulation and in any event as soon as it is available, as well as its readiness to take appropriate measures if necessary.
Zaradi vztrajanja delegacije EP je bila klavzula o pregledu razdeljena na posebni del s krajšim časovnim razporedom do leta 2008, ki zadeva kršenje osebnih pravic („obrekovanje“), ter na splošni del z običajnim časovnim razporedom, v skladu s katerim bo Komisija predstavila poročilo o uporabi uredbe štiri leta po začetku njene veljavnosti.
On the insistence of the EP Delegation the review clause was split into a special section with a shorter timetable by 2008 as regards violation of privacy rights ("defamation") and a general section with the standard timetable whereby the Commission will present a report on the application of the Regulation four years after its entry into force.
Kot del splošne klavzule o pregledu bo Komisija izvedla tudi študijo o tem, kako sodišča v državah članicah obravnavajo in uporabljajo tuje pravo, ter drugo študijo o učinkih člena 28 uredbe („Razmerje do obstoječih mednarodnih konvencij“) v zvezi s Haaško konvencijo o uporabi prava za nesreče v cestnem prometu z dne 4. maja 1971.
As part of the general review clause the Commission will also carry out a study on the treatment and application of foreign law by the courts of the Member States and a second study on the effects of Article 28 of the Regulation ("Relationship with existing international conventions") with regard to the Hague Convention of 4 May 1971 on the law applicable to traffic accidents.