natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sklep je v ta namen določil strukturo evropske mreže za preprečevanje kriminala, ki temelji na kontaktnih točkah, ki jih določijo Komisija (eno kontaktno točko) in posamezne države članice (največ tri kontaktne točke na državo članico).
To this end, the decision provided that the EUCPN would consist of contact points, including one designated by the Commission and up to three national contact points designated by each Member State.
Te točke naj bi vključevale vsaj enega predstavnika nacionalnih organov, pristojnih za preprečevanje vseh oblik kriminala, za preostale točke pa bi bilo mogoče določiti raziskovalce in specializirane akademike ali druge udeležence, ki se ukvarjajo s preprečevanjem kriminala.
These were to include at least one representative from the national authorities competent for crime prevention in its many aspects, while the other contact points could be researchers, academics specialising in this field or other actors in crime prevention.
Države članice bi v vsakem primeru morale vključiti raziskovalce, akademike ter druge udeležence na področju preprečevanja kriminala, kot so nevladne organizacije, lokalni organi lokalnih skupnosti in udeleženci v zasebnem sektorju.
In any case, the Member States were to involve researchers, academics and other actors in crime prevention, such as non-governmental organisations, local authorities and the private sector.
Pri dejavnostih sta sodelovala Europol in Evropski center za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami ter tudi druge ustrezne organizacije.
Europol and the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) were to be associated with this work, along with other relevant bodies.
Leta 2005 je bila notranja struktura mreže prenovljena, kar je pripeljalo do ustanovitve dveh stalnih odborov, enega zadolženega za delovni program in drugega za raziskave, upravljanje spletne strani pa je Komisija predala Združenemu kraljestvu, ki od tedaj skrbi za njeno posodabljanje
In 2005 the Network underwent internal restructuring leading to the establishment of two standing committees, one on its work programme and the other on research; the United Kingdom took over the task of managing the website from the European Commission, and has kept it up to date ever since
spletna stran mreže za preprečevanje kriminala je http://www.eucpn.org/ .
The EUCPN’s website is http://www.eucpn.org/. .
Leta 2007 so nacionalni predstavniki opravili še eno notranjo revizijo delovanja mreže ter sklenili, da je treba okrepiti sekretariat (kjer je do tedaj delal en sam uradnik Komisije, ki se je z mrežo ukvarjal le del svojega delovnega časa), opozorili pa so tudi, da je treba rešiti problem sredstev za stalne odbore in za nacionalne predstavnike.
In 2007 the national representatives carried out a further internal review of the EUCPN’s performance, which highlighted the need to enlarge the Secretariat (hitherto consisting of one Commission official who ran the Network on a part-time basis) and address the issue of resources for the standing committees and the national representatives.
Marca 2009 je bila objavljena zunanja ocena delovanje mreže, ki je po eni strani poudarila pomen ciljev in nalog mreže, po drugi strani pa pokazala na neuspešno organizacijo, zaradi katere potenciala in učinka mreže ni bilo mogoče izkoristiti v celoti.
An external evaluation of the functioning of the EUCPN was published in March 2009; while it emphasised the relevance of the Network’s objectives and tasks, it also identified organisational flaws that prevented it from maximising its potential and impact.
Med težavami, ki jih je izpostavila zunanja ocena, so pomanjkanje ustreznih sredstev; neučinkovit sekretariat; premajhna zavzetost pri nacionalnih predstavnikih; skromen delovni program; eksternalizacija nalog kriminoloških raziskav (na dunajski univerzi jih je izvajal raziskovalec, ki je delal s krajšim delovnim časom in sicer le dva delovna dneva tedensko).
The problems highlighted by the external report included a lack of adequate resources, an ineffective Secretariat, a lack of commitment on the part of the national representatives, a scant work programme, the outsourcing of its criminological research function (carried out by the University of Vienna, with a part-time researcher working two days a week).
V oceni je bila celo upoštevana možnost opustitve mreže.
The evaluation also raised the possibility of dismantling the Network.
Skupina je zlasti poudarila potrebo po vzpostavitvi zunanjega sekretariata, ki bi ga financirali s sredstvi programa Skupnosti „Preprečevanje in boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu“ (v okviru splošnega programa „Varnost in varovanje svoboščin“).
In particular, it was proposed that an external Secretariat be set up, funded by the Community programme entitled ‘Prevention of and Fight against Crime’ (under the general programme on ‘Security and Safeguarding Liberties’).
Čeprav so nekatere države članice zaradi splošnega nezadovoljstva zaradi neuspeha pri doseganju zastavljenih ciljev celo razmišljale o opustitvi mreže, je skupina držav članic predstavila predlog prenovitve mreže.
Although some Member States had also raised the possibility of dismantling the Network in view of the general dissatisfaction with its failure to fulfil expectations, a group of Member States presented a proposal for reforming it.
Švedsko predsedstvo Unije je ta predlog uvrstilo med prednostne naloge, ki naj bi jih sprejeli v polletju njegovega predsedovanja, vsekakor pa pred uveljavitvijo Lizbonske pogodbe.
The Swedish Presidency of the European Union made this proposal a priority, wishing it to be adopted during its six-month stint or in any event prior to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.
Predlog sklepa Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropske mreže za preprečevanje
Proposal for a Council Decision establishing a European Crime Prevention Network
kriminala (EUCPN) in razveljavitvi Sklepa 2001/427/PNZ
(EUCPN) and repealing Decision 2001/427/JHA
Predlog predvideva razveljavitev Sklepa 2001/427/PNZ.
The proposal under consideration provides for the repeal of Decision 2001/427/JHA .
Med maloštevilnimi spremembami, ki jih predlaga dokument, sta omejena prenovitev mreže z vzpostavitvijo zunanjega sekretariata ter poskus pojasnitve namena, vloge in odgovornosti mreže ter organov, ki v njej delujejo.
The few changes proposed in the document include limited restructuring of the Network through the establishment of an external secretariat, and an effort to clarify the functions, roles and responsibilities of both the Network itself and the bodies operating within it.
Nova – in kompleksna – predlagana struktura določa, da mrežo sestavljajo sekretariat, kontaktne točke, ki jih določijo posamezne države članice, in uprava.
Under the proposed new – and somewhat complicated – structure, the Network would consist of a Secretariat, contact points designated by each Member State, and a Board.
Opozoriti je treba, da novi predlog ustvarja zmedo o tem, kaj so kontaktne točke in kaj nacionalnimi predstavniki.
It should be noted that the new proposal creates confusion between the contact points and the national representatives.
Delno so tudi črtane omembe vključevanja strokovnjakov, akademikov, nevladnih organizacij, civilne družbe na evropski in nacionalni ravni.
In addition, it partially removes the references to the involvement of experts, academics, NGOs and civil society at both European and national level.
Odpravljene so tudi nekatere strukturne povezave med mrežo in drugimi institucijami in organi Skupnosti, ki se ukvarjajo s kriminalom in preprečevanjem.
Furthermore, it severs some of the structural links between the Network and other institutions and Community bodies dealing with crime prevention.
Zlasti pa sklep ne določa nobene oblike sodelovanja z Evropskim parlamentom.
In particular, it does not provide for any form of cooperation with the European Parliament.
Izpuščena je zahteva po znanju tujih jezikov, ki je bila prej prisotna.
It also omits the previous requirement for language knowledge.
Vprašanje, ki so mu Komisija in države članice med razpravo na sedežu Sveta posvetile največ pozornosti in ki je bilo najbolj sporno, je bilo vprašanje sekretariata, njegovega financiranja, možnosti eksternalizacije, njegove neodvisnosti in vodilne vloge, ki bi jo morala imeti Komisija in Svet, ter težave v zvezi z osebjem.
In the course of the discussion of the proposal by the Commission and the Member States in Council, the most contentious, controversial issues were the Secretariat, its funding, the possibility of outsourcing it, its independence, the leadership role to be played by the Commission and the Council, and staffing problems.
Pomanjkljivo sodelovanje med Komisijo, Svetom in državami članicami je ustvarilo okoliščine, ko je dejansko prihajalo do sabotaže mreže, s tem pa tudi bolj splošnega cilja Evropske unije – boja proti kriminalu, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom, s preprečevanjem teh pojavov.
The lack of cooperation between the Commission, the Council and the Member States has helped to create a situation that has essentially sabotaged the Network, as well as the European Union’s wider objective of fighting crime, including organised crime, by means of prevention.
Preprečevanje kriminala na splošno, zlasti pa organiziranega kriminala, ne more biti omejeno na izmenjavo najboljših praks na slabo obiskanih in pomanjkljivo organiziranih srečanjih, na katerih sodelujejo nacionalni predstavniki, ki se zaradi pomanjkanja jezikovnih veščin ne morejo med seboj sporazumevati, zaradi česar od vsega skupaj ne ostane nič drugega kot turizem nacionalnih uradnikov.
Crime prevention, particularly in the area of organised crime, cannot be confined to exchanges of best practice conducted at poorly attended, badly organised meetings between national representatives unable to communicate with one another owing to a lack of language competence, thereby reducing the whole process to a tourist trip for national officials.
Mreža je tako postala v primerjavi z drugimi pomembnimi institucijami in akterji na tem področju nevidna, k čemur je med drugim prispevalo nevključevanje civilne družbe, akademikov in nevladnih organizacij, opustitev prevajanja dokumentov in informacij, ki so prikazane na spletni strani, ter priprave materiala o preprečevanju (na primer za šole, učitelje in učence).
Among other things, the failure to involve civil society, academia and NGOs, the failure to translate the documents and information featured on the Network’s website, and the failure to develop material on prevention (such as documentation for schools, teachers and pupils) all meant the Network was overshadowed by the other institutions and players working in this sector.
Obravnavani predlog se zdi popolnoma neustrezen in kot tak ne more razrešiti težav, na katere so opozorile večkrat ponovljene ocene mreže (kar kaže na zavedanje o njenem slabem delovanju) – težave namreč predlog še dodatno zaplete, namesto da bi poiskal ustrezne rešitve.
The proposal under consideration seems utterly inadequate to solve the problems highlighted by the repeated evaluations of the Network – clearly indicating an awareness of its operational failings – since it appears to complicate them further rather than identifying suitable solutions.
Poročevalka tudi meni, da je treba, če želimo, da bi mreža končno delovala, jasno okrepiti njeno pristojnost, kar bi omogočilo tudi obravnavo problema preprečevanja organiziranega kriminala, ki se kot hobotnica vse bolj razrašča v vse večjem številu evropskih držav, k čemur je dodatno prispevala začasna ukinitev dejavnosti foruma o preprečevanju kriminala.
In addition, the rapporteur is of the view that, if the Network is at last to become functional, its powers and responsibilities must be explicitly broadened to include the prevention of organised crime, which is continually spreading its tentacles to more European states – especially since the activities of the Forum on Organised Crime Prevention were suspended.
Poročevalka kritizira nasprotovanje nekaterih držav članic temu in meni, da se za tem stališčem dejansko skriva njihova nepripravljenost, da bi priznale in obravnavale postopno in vse bolj zaskrbljujoče prodiranje kriminalnih organizacij v vse večje število evropskih držav.
The rapporteur condemns some Member States’ opposition to the idea, fearing that their stance in fact reflects a desire to avoid having to acknowledge and address the issue of criminal organisations’ gradual, and increasingly worrying, penetration into an ever-growing number of European states.
Z medinstitucionalnega stališča se od Parlamenta zahteva, da se odpove institucionalnemu pooblastilu, ki mu ga nova pogodba daje na področju preprečevanja kriminala: soodločanju.
From an interinstitutional perspective, the EP is being asked to renounce institutional prerogatives to be conferred upon it by the new Treaty in respect of crime prevention: namely, co-decision powers.
Poročevalka bi lahko tak postopek sprejela le, če bi Komisija in Svet slovesno obljubila, da bosta takoj po uveljavitvi Lizbonske pogodbe predstavila ambiciozen predlog, in sicer tako, da bosta vzela za izhodišče že omenjeno ustanovitev opazovalnice za kriminal, zlasti organizirani kriminal, ki bi imela polna in natančna pooblastila glede zbiranja podatkov in informacij, primerjanja, vrednotenja in priporočanja.
This would have been acceptable to the rapporteur only if the Commission and the Council had solemnly promised to present an ambitious proposal straight after the Lisbon Treaty enters into force, based on the possibility – already raised – of setting up an observatory on crime, in particular, organised crime, with wide-ranging powers and responsibilities, including specific powers to collect data, gather information, draw comparisons, conduct evaluations and make recommendations.
Poročevalka meni, da je treba pobudo zavrniti na podoben način, kot namerava Evropski parlament zavrniti predloge glede Europola, in kot so na začetku razmišljale nekatere države članice in institucije, zato da bi se prenovitve mreže lotili resneje in z vidika strukture tudi bolj ambiciozno, na podlagi prave evropske politike preprečevanja kriminala, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom in kriminalom terorističnega značaja, po uveljavitvi Lizbonske pogodbe, ki v zvezi s tem določa posebno pravno podlago.
The rapporteur is of the view that, as the EP is preparing to do in respect of the Europol proposals, and as initially envisaged by a number of Member States and institutions, the initiative should be rejected in favour of more serious, structural and ambitious reform of the Network – based on a genuine European policy on the prevention of crime, including organised crime and terrorism – following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, which establishes a specific legal basis for it.
S tem bi preprečili, da bi položaj, ki je popolnoma nezadovoljiv, podaljšali v nedogled, Evropski parlament in Svet pa bi s soodločanjem boj proti kriminalu laže spreminjala v konkretna dejanja, in sicer s preprečevanjem v Evropski uniji ter z vzpostavitvijo opazovalnice za kriminal, organizirani kriminal in preprečevanje.
Without prolonging a wholly unsatisfactory situation, this will enable the European Parliament and the Council – via the co-decision procedure – to translate the fight against crime into action through EU-wide prevention, by setting up an observatory on crime, organised crime and prevention.
PRILOGA: Seznam poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, katerih mandat je veljaven........................5
ANNEX : List of Members of the European Parliament whose mandate is declared valid...............5
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................43
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................44
– ob upoštevanju Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976
– having regard to the Act of 20 September 1976
– ob upoštevanju členov 3, 4 in 9 ter Priloge I svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 3, 4 and 9 of, and Annex I to, its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7‑0073/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0073/2009 ),
A. ker člen 7(1) in (2) akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 določa funkcije, ki niso združljive s funkcijo poslanca Evropskega parlamenta,
A. whereas Article 7(1) and (2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 sets out the offices that are incompatible with the office of Member of the European Parliament,
B. ker je od začetka tega zakonodajnega obdobja funkcija poslanca Evropskega parlamenta nezdružljiva s funkcijo poslanca nacionalnega parlamenta katere koli države članice, tudi Združenega kraljestva, saj se začasno odstopanje po členu 7(2), drugi pododstavek, druga alinea, tega akta ne uporablja več,
B. whereas, in particular, as from the beginning of the current legislative term, the office of Member of the European Parliament shall be incompatible with that of member of a national parliament of any Member State, including the United Kingdom, since the temporary derogation granted by Article 7(2), second subparagraph, second indent, of the said Act is no longer applicable,
C. ker so organi Združenega kraljestva leta 2008 sprejeli ustrezen predpis v zvezi z Evropskim parlamentom (prekinitev mandata članov lordske zbornice), po katerem se dosmrtni člani lordske zbornice ne smejo udeleževati sej ali glasovanj v tej zbornici ali njenih odborih, vse dokler so poslanci Evropskega parlamenta, v času prekinitve mandata v smislu tega predpisa pa jim ne sme biti izdan poziv na zasedanje parlamenta,
C. whereas the United Kingdom authorities accordingly adopted the 'European Parliament (House of Lords Disqualification) Regulations 2008', under which Members of the House of Lords holding the office of life peer are disqualified from sitting or voting in the House of Lords or in a committee thereof at any time during which they remain Members of the European Parliament, and no writ of summons can be issued to them while they are disqualified under the terms of those Regulations,
D. ker člen 9 in Priloga I poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta določata, da morajo poslanci natančno prijaviti poklicne dejavnosti in druge funkcije in dejavnosti, za katere prejemajo plačilo,
D. whereas, under Rule 9 of, and Annex I to, the Rules of Procedure, Members are required to make a detailed declaration of their professional activities and any other remunerated functions or activities,
E. ker so vse države članice Evropski parlament obvestile o imenih izvoljenih kandidatov, čeprav nekatere še vedno niso poslale seznamov namestnikov v vrstnem redu glede na izide glasovanja, kot to določa člen 3(4) poslovnika, oziroma so to storile z zamudo,
E. whereas all of the Member States have notified the European Parliament of the names of the elected candidates, although some have still not forwarded – or have done so belatedly – the lists of any substitutes together with their ranking in accordance with the results of the vote, as required under Rule 3(4) of the Rules of Procedure,
F. ker so v nekaterih primerih države članice poslale nepopolna obvestila o izvoljenih kandidatih in so podrobnosti poslale naknadno,
F. whereas in some cases Member States provided partial notification of elected candidates and forwarded further details subsequently,
G. ker v nekaterih državah članicah ugovore zoper izvolitev nekaterih poslancev Parlamenta obravnavajo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ti postopki pa lahko vodijo v razveljavitev izvolitve teh poslancev,
G. whereas in some Member States objections to the election of some Members of Parliament are being considered in accordance with national legislation and whereas these procedures could result in the annulment of the election of the Members concerned,
H. ker mora v skladu s členom 12 akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 Evropski parlament odločiti o sporih v zvezi z veljavnostjo mandata poslancev samo, če gre pri sporih za kršitev določb akta, ne pa tudi v primeru kršitev nacionalnih volilnih določb, na katere se akt nanaša,
H. whereas, pursuant to Article 12 of the Act of 20 September 1976, the European Parliament is required to rule on any disputes concerning the validity of the mandate of its Members only where these relate to breaches of the provisions of the abovementioned Act, and not in the case of breaches of the national electoral provisions to which the Act refers,
2. ponovno prosi pristojne nacionalne organe, naj Evropskemu parlamentu nemudoma sporočijo vsa imena izvoljenih kandidatov in imena namestnikov v vrstnem redu glede na izide glasovanja;
Repeats its request to the competent national authorities not only promptly to notify the European Parliament of all the names of the elected candidates but also to forward the names of any substitutes together with their ranking in accordance with the results of the vote;
PRILOGA: Seznam poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, katerih mandat je veljaven
ANNEX : List of Members of the European Parliament whose mandate is declared valid
IZVOLJENI POSLANCI PARLAMENTA PO DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH
MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT BY MEMBER STATE
(14. julij 2009)
(14 July 2009)
Belgija (22 poslancev)
Belgi um (22 Members )
(*) Mandat Jean-Clauda MARCOURTA se je iztekel 16. julija 2009.
(*) Mr Jean-Claude MARCOURT's mandate ended on 16 July 2009.
(**) Mandat veljaven od 16. julija 2009, ko so pristojni nacionalni organi sporočili izvolitev Marca TARABELLE namesto Jean-Clauda MARCOURTA.
(**) Mandate valid with effect from 16 July 2009, date of the notification by the competent national authority of the election of Mr Marc TARABELLA to replace Mr Jean-Claude MARCOURT.
Bolgarija (17 poslancev)
Bulgari a (17 Members )
ILČEV Stanimir
ILCHEV Stanimir
IOTOVA Ilijana Malinova
IOTOVA Iliana Malinova
ŽELEVA Rumjana (*)
JELEVA Rumiana (*)
KALFIN Ivajlo
KALFIN Ivaylo
KOVAČEV Andrej (**)
KOVATCHEV Andrey (**)
MIHAJLOVA Nadežda
MIHAYLOVA Nadezhda
NEDELČEVA Marija
NEDELCHEVA Mariya
PRVANOVA Antonija
PARVANOVA Antonyia
STOJANOV Emil
STOYANOV Emil
URUČEV Vladimir
URUTCHEV Vladimir
(*) Mandat Rumjane ŽELEVE se je iztekel 27. julija 2009.
(*) Ms Rumiana JELEVA's mandate ended on 27 July 2009.
(**) Mandat veljaven od 24. avgusta 2009, ko so pristojni nacionalni organi sporočili izvolitev Andreja KOVAČEVA namesto Rumjane ŽELEVE.
(**) Mandate valid with effect from 24 August 2009, date of the notification by the competent national authority of the election of Mr Andrey KOVATCHEV to replace Ms Rumiana JELEVA.
Češka republika (22 poslancev)
Czech Republic (22 Members )
Danska (13 poslancev)
D en mark (13 Members )
Nemčija (99 poslancev)
Germany (99 Members )
Estonija (6 poslancev)
Estoni a (6 Members )
Irska (12 poslancev)
Ir e land (12 Members )
Grčija (22 poslancev)
Gr ee ce (22 Members )
HUNTIS Nikolaos
CHOUNTIS Nikolaos
GIANAKU Marietta
GIANNAKOU Marietta
KOPA Maria Eleni
KOPPA Maria Eleni
KUMUCAKOS Georgios
KOUMOUTSAKOS Georgios
KRACA-CANGAROPULU Rodi
KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi
PAFILIS Atanasios
PAFILIS Athanasios
PALIADELI Hrisula
PALIADELI Chrysoula
PAPAKONSTANTINU Giorgos
PAPAKONSTANTINOU Giorgos
PAPANIKOLAU Georgios
PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios
PLEVRIS Atanasios
PLEVRIS Athanasios
PODIMATA Ani
PODIMATA Anni
PUPAKIS Konstantinos
POUPAKIS Konstantinos
RAPTI Silvana
RAPTI Sylvana
SKILAKAKIS Teodoros
SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros
TUSAS Georgios
TOUSSAS Georgios
TREMOPULOS Mihail
TREMOPOULOS Michail
CUKALAS Ioanis
TSOUKALAS Ioannis
CAVELA Niki
TZAVELA Niki
Španija (50 poslancev)
Spain (50 Members )
Francija (72 poslancev)
France (72 Members )
Italija (72 poslancev)
Italy (72 Members )
Ciper (6 poslancev)
Cyprus (6 Members )
Latvija (8 poslancev)
Latvia (8 Members )
Litva (12 poslancev)
Lithuania (12 Members )
Luksemburg (6 poslancev)
Luxembourg (6 Members )
Madžarska (22 poslancev)
Hungary (22 Members )
Malta (5 poslancev)
Malta (5 Members )
Nizozemska (25 poslancev)
Netherlands (25 Members )
Avstrija (17 poslancev)
Austria (17 Members )
Poljska (50 poslancev)
Poland (50 Members )
Portugalska (22 poslancev)
Portugal (22 Members )
Romunija (33 poslancev)
Romania (33 Members )
Slovenija (7 poslancev)
Slovenia (7 Members )
Slovaška (13 poslancev)
Slova kia (13 Members )
Finska (13 poslancev)
Finland (13 Members )
Švedska (18 poslancev)
Sweden (18 Members )