natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ker Lihtenštajn pristopa k schengenskemu sporazumu s Švico, bo imel enake pravice in obveznosti kot Švica.
As Liechtenstein is acceding to the Schengen agreement with Switzerland, it will have the same rights and obligations as Switzerland.
Schengenski pravni red in njegov razvoj bo moral sprejeti in uporabljati brez vsakršne izjeme in odstopanja
Liechtenstein will have to accept and apply Schengen acquis and its development without any exception or derogation
V zvezi z razvojem schengenskega pravnega reda je bila dovoljena izjema za primer zahteve za preiskavo in zaseg za namene preiskav ali naloga za preiskavo ali pregon kršitev na področju neposredne obdavčitve, ki bi, če bi bile storjene v Lihtenštajnu, po pravu Lihtenštajna ne bile kaznovane z odvzemom prostosti (člen 5(5) protokola). .
However, an exception has been granted, concerning the development of Schengen acquis , if such a development concerns search and seizure requests or orders made for the purposes of investigating or prosecuting offences in the field of direct taxation which, if committed in Liechtenstein, would not be punishable under Liechtenstein law with a custodial penalty (Article 5(5) of the Protocol). .
Če sprejeti novi akti ali ukrepi lahko zanj postanejo zavezujoči šele, ko izpolnjujejo ustavne zahteve (referendum), potem ima Lihtenštajn za sprejem in izvajanje nove schengenske zakonodaje
With adoption of new acts or measures, if the content of such acts and measures can become binding on Liechtenstein only after fulfilment of constitutional requirements (a referendum), then Liechtenstein would have 18 months grace period to accept and implement new Schengen legislation
Norveška je imela za sprejetje in izvajanje nastajajočega schengenskega pravnega reda na voljo 6 mesecev, Islandija 4 tedne in Švica 24 mesecev. na voljo 18 mesecev.
Norway had 6 months, Iceland had 4 weeks, Switzerland had 24 months in order to accept and implement the future Schengen acquis . .
Vseeno pa bi moral omenjene akte in ukrepe medtem začasno izvajati, kjer je to mogoče.
However, in the meantime, Liechtenstein should, where possible, implement the act or measure in question on a provisional basis.
Lihtenštajn postane tudi član mešanega odbora.
Liechtenstein also becomes a member of the Mixed Committee.
Ob upoštevanju obstoječega sodelovanja s Švico na področju vizumske politike in varnostnih zadev, ki vključuje uporabo skupnih podatkovnih baz, lahko Lihtenštajn za dostop do schengenskega informacijskega sistema in vizumskega informacijskega sistema uporablja tehnično infrastrukturo Švice.
Given the existing cooperation with Switzerland in the field of visa policy and security matters which includes the use of common databases, Liechtenstein may use the technical infrastructure of Switzerland for its access to the Schengen Information System and the Visa Information System.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3) je o sklenitvi protokola potrebno posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom.
The European Parliament is consulted on the conclusion of the Protocol in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 300(3)).
V dopisu z dne 21. marca 2007 je Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta zahteval mnenje Odbora za pravne zadeve o predlagani pravni podlagi.
By letter of 21 March 2007 the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs requested, in accordance with Rule 35(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, an opinion from the Legal Affairs Committee on the legal basis proposed.
Ker ustanovitev skupnih/mešanih odborov zajema vzpostavitev organizacijske strukture z diskrecijsko pravico sprejemanja odločitev, ki bodo zavezujoče za pogodbene stranke, zlasti kar zadeva ohranitev sporazuma in reševanje sporov, in ker protokol razširja skupne/mešane odbore tako, da vključuje Lihtenštajn kot državo pogodbenico, je Odbor za pravne zadeve na seji 11. junija 2007 sklenil priporočiti spremembo pravne podlage v drugi odstavek člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, ki zahteva privolitev Parlamenta in ne le posvetovanje z njim.
At its meeting of 11 June 2007 the Legal Affairs Committee decided, as the establishment of the Joint/Mixed Committees entails the creation of an organisation structure with a discretion to take decision binding on the contracting parties, in particular with regard to the maintenance of the Agreement and dispute resolution and as the Protocol extends the Joint/Mixed Committees by including Liechtenstein as a contracting party, to recommend that he legal basis should be changed so as to refer to the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, which requires the assent and not merely consultation of the European Parliament.
Poročevalka podpira sklenitev protokola in priporoča privolitev vanj.
The rapporteur supports the conclusion of the Protocol and recommends giving assent to it.
Vseeno pa meni, da bi moral biti Evropski parlament v prihodnje podrobneje obveščen o tekočih mednarodnih pogajanjih, da bi lahko izvrševal svoje pristojnosti.
However, the rapporteur considers that the European Parliament should in future be more closely informed about ongoing international negotiations in order to be able to exercise its competences.
Zadeva: Predlog sklepa Sveta o podpisu v imenu Evropske skupnosti ter o začasni uporabi nekaterih določb Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda ( KOM(2006)0725 – 2006/0251(CNS) )
Subject: Proposal for a Council decision on the signature, on behalf of the European Community, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis( COM(2006)0725 – 2006/0251(CNS) )
v pismu z dne 21. marca 2007 ste v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o točnosti in primernosti pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 21 March 2007 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Pismo opozarja na dejstvo, da je 13. oktobra 2005 Parlament ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve, ki je menil, da je ustrezna pravna podlaga drugi odstavek člena 300(3) pogodbe o ES, odobril sklenitev sporazuma s Švico o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda.
That letter points out that on 13 October 2005 Parliament approved the conclusion of an agreement with Switzerland on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, having regard to the opinion of the Legal Affairs Committee, which considered that the appropriate legal basis was the second paragraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty.
Predlogi, ki se sedaj obravnavajo, so v zvezi s sklenitvijo protokola k sporazumu s Švico, da bi se tako omogočilo kneževini Lihtenštajn, da pristopi k sporazumu.
As regards the proposals now under consideration, these relate to the conclusion of a Protocol to the agreement with Switzerland so as to allow the Principality of Liechtenstein to accede thereto.
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine ugotavlja, da je pristop Lihtenštajna predviden v glavnem sporazumu, in sicer v členu 16 schengenskega sporazuma s Švico.
The Civil Liberties Committee notes that the accession of Liechtenstein is provided for in the main agreement, namely in Article 16 of the Schengen Agreement with Switzerland.
Odbor nadalje ugotavlja, da se vprašanje v zvezi s privolitvijo Parlamenta spet pojavlja zato, ker protokol razširja skupne/mešane odbore tako, da vključuje Lihtenštajn kot državo pogodbenico.
The Committee further observes that the question concerning the assent of Parliament arises once again due to the fact that the Protocol extends the Joint/Mixed Committees by including Liechtenstein as a contracting party.
Ta razlog je še pomembnejši zato, ker ima odbor, kar zadeva protokol, odločilno vlogo.
That reason is strengthened by the fact that the Committee play a decision-making role with regard to the Protocol.
Odbor opozarja Odbor za pravne zadeve na dejstvo, da enaki pravni argumenti, ki govorijo v prid vključitvi drugega pododstavka člena 300(3) (privolitev) kot ustrezne pravne podlage namesto prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) (posvetovanje), bi se lahko nanašali tudi na sklenitev protokola, enako, kot je Parlament trdil, da se nanašajo na sklenitev glavnega sporazuma s Švico.
The Committee draws the attention of the Committee on Legal Affairs to the fact that the same legal arguments in support of including Article 300(3), second subparagraph (assent), as the appropriate legal basis instead of Article 300(3), first subparagraph (consultation), could apply to the conclusion of the Protocol in the same way as Parliament argued that they applied with regard to the conclusion of the main agreement with Switzerland.
Člen 300(3)
Article 300(3)
Svet lahko odloča, če mnenje ni dano v roku.
In the absence of an opinion within that time-limit, the Council may act.
Ugotoviti je treba, ali obravnavani sporazum z uvedbo postopkov sodelovanja vzpostavlja poseben institucionalni okvir.
The question to be determined is whether the agreement in question establishes a specific institutional framework by organising cooperation procedures.
Iz ustaljene prakse Sodišča
It is noted, in limine , that it is settled case-law of the Court of Justice
62. je nadalje razvidno, da izbira pravne podlage za akte Skupnosti mora temeljiti izključno na objektivnih dejavnikih, ki jih je mogoče sodno preskusiti, kot sta denimo cilj in vsebina zadevnega ukrepa.
62. that the choice of legal basis of Community acts is to be determined solely by reference to objective criteria that are amenable to judicial review, and in particular the aim and content of the act being proposed.
Predlogi se nanašajo izrecno na podpis protokola o pristopu Lihtenštajna k sporazumu, ki je bil že sklenjen s Švicarsko konfederacijo.
The proposals relate specifically to the signature of a Protocol on the accession of Liechtenstein to an agreement already concluded with the Swiss Confederation.
Medtem ko Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti še ni razložilo pojma "posebnega institucionalnega okvira" v smislu 2. pododstavka člena 300(3), je Odbor za pravne zadeve zatrdil, da je bila za sklenitev glavnega sporazuma potrebna privolitev Parlamenta v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3) na osnovi tega, da je ta sporazum jasno vzpostavil "poseben institucionalni okvir" (predvideni skupni/mešani odbori pomenijo vzpostavitev institucionalne strukture, ki bo upravičena sprejemati odločitve, ki bodo zavezujoče za pogodbene stranke, zlasti kar zadeva ohranitev sporazuma in reševanje sporov).
Whereas the Court of Justice has yet to interpret the concept of a "specific institutional framework" within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 300(3), the Legal Affairs Committee has held that the main Agreement required the assent of Parliament under the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) on the ground that at clearly established a "specific institutional framework" (the Joint/Mixed Committees provided for entail the creation of an organisational structure with a discretion to take decisions binding on the contracting parties, in particular with regard to the maintenance of the Agreement and dispute resolution).
Nadalje je treba ugotoviti, da se protokoli običajno sklenejo na isti pravni podlagi kot glavni sporazum.
It is further observed that protocols are generally concluded on the same legal basis as the main agreement.
Končno, ko bo protokol sklenjen, bo sam institucionalni okvir formalno spremenjen, saj bodo skupni/mešani odbori razširjeni z vključitvijo novih članov - predstavnikov Liechtensteina.
Lastly, when the Protocol is concluded, the institutional framework will itself be formally modified, because the Joint/Mixed Committees will be extended through the inclusion of new Members - representing Liechtenstein.
Smatra se torej, da bo predlagani sklep Sveta spremenil "poseben institucionalni okvir", ki ga predvideva glavni sporazum, in da bi se torej bilo treba sklicevati na drugi pododstavek člena 300(3) pogodbe o ES.
To that extent, it is considered that the proposals for Council decisions set out to modify the " specific institutional framework " provided for in the main Agreement, and that hence reference should be made to the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty.
V luči povedanega se torej smatra, da je namen predloga sklepa Sveta spremeniti "poseben institucionalni okvir", ki ga določa glavni sporazum, katerega sestavni del je predlagani protokol.
In light of the foregoing, it is considered that the proposals for Council Decisions set out to modify the " specific institutional framework " provided for in the main Agreement, of which the proposed Protocol forms an integral part.
Na seji dne 11. junija 2007 se je Odbor za pravne zadeve odločil, soglasno
At its meeting of 11 June 2007 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Cristian Dumitrescu, predsednik; Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, podpredsednica; Manuel Medina Ortega, pripravljavec mnenja; Carlo Casini, Janelly Fourtou; Luis de Grandes Pascual, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Michel Rocard, Aloyzas Sakalas, Gabriele Stauner, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina in Tadeusz Zwiefka. , da vam priporoči, da bi bilo treba spremeniti pravno podlago tako, da se sedaj sklicuje na drugi odstavek člena 300(3) pogodbe o ES, ki zahteva privolitev Parlamenta in ne le posvetovanje z njim.
The following were present for the final vote: Cristian Dumitrescu (acting chairman), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (vice-chairwoman), Manuel Medina Ortega (draftsman), Carlo Casini, Janelly Fourtou, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Michel Rocard, Aloyzas Sakalas, Gabriele Stauner, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina and Tadeusz Zwiefka. , to recommend that the legal basis should be changed so as to refer to the second paragraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, which requires the assent and not merely consultation of Parliament.
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola med Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o merilih in mehanizmih za določitev države, odgovorne za obravnavo prošnje za azil, vložene v državi članici ali v Švici
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola med Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o merilih in mehanizmih za določitev države, odgovorne za obravnavo prošnje za azil, vložene v državi članici ali v Švici
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanims for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2006)0754 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0754 ),
– ob upoštevanju Protokola med Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o merilih in mehanizmih za določitev države, odgovorne za obravnavo prošnje za azil, vložene v državi članici ali v Švici,
– having regard to the protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland,
– ob upoštevanju člena 63(1)(a) in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 63(1)(a) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0090/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0090/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0247/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0247/2008 ),
3. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter vladi in parlamentu Kneževine Lihtenštajn.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, and the government and parliament of the Principality of Liechtenstein.
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 63(1)(a) Pogodbe v zvezi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 63(1)(a) thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 63(1)(a) Pogodbe v zvezi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 63(1)(a) thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju privolitve Evropskega parlamenta,
Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament ,
Protokol k sporazumu o pravnem redu Dublin/Eurodac
The Protocol to the Dublin/Eurodac acquis Agreement
Namen protokola je povezati Lihtenštajn z delovanjem EU na področju pravnega reda Dublin/Eurodac s pristopom Lihtenštajna k sporazumu Dublin/Eurodac s Švico
The purpose of this protocol is to associate Liechtenstein with the work of the EU in the area of the Dublin/Eurodac acquis by accession of Liechtenstein to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland
26. oktobra 2004 podpisan sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o merilih in mehanizmih za določitev države, odgovorne za obravnavo prošnje za azil, vložene v državi članici ali v Švici („sporazum Dublin/Eurodac s Švico“).
Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland signed on 26 October 2004.
Člen 15 tega sporazuma določa možnost Lihtenštajna za pristop k temu sporazumu s protokolom. preko protokola.
Article 15 of this Agreement provides for the possibility of Liechtenstein to accede to that Agreement via a protocol. via a protocol.
Lihtenštajn je z dopisom z dne 12. oktobra 2001 že izrazil željo, da bi se pridružil Švici kot pogodbenica k morebitnima pridružitvenima sporazumoma o schengenskem pravnem redu in pravnem redu Dublin, saj se že desetletja izvaja politika odprtih meja za pretok oseb med Lihtenštajnom in Švico.
By letter dated 12 October 2001, Liechtenstein had already expressed its interest in joining Switzerland as a contracting party to a possible Schengen and Dublin acquis association agreements since an open border policy for the movement of persons had existed between Liechtenstein and Switzerland for decades.
Vendar Lihtenštajn ni bil vključen v pogajanja s Švico, saj z Evropsko skupnostjo nima sklenjenega sporazuma o obdavčitvi prihrankov.
However, Liechtenstein was not associated with the negotiations with Switzerland due to the absence of an agreement on savings taxation between the European Community and Liechtenstein.
Lihtenštajn pristopa k sporazumu Dublin/Eurodac s Švico ter bo imel enake pravice in obveznosti kot Švica.
As Liechtenstein is acceding to the Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland, it will have the same rights and obligations as Switzerland.
Moral bo sprejeti in uporabljati pravni red Dublin/Eurodac in njegov razvoj brez vsakršne izjeme in odstopanja.
Liechtenstein will have to accept and apply Dublin/Eurodac acquis and its development without any exception or derogation.
Če sprejeti novi akti ali ukrepi zanj lahko postanejo zavezujoči šele ob izpolnitvi ustavnih zahtev (z referendumom), potem ima na voljo obdobje 18 mesecev za sprejem in izvajanje nove zakonodaje
With adoption of new acts or measures, if the content of such acts and measures can become binding on Liechtenstein only after fulfilment of constitutional requirements (a referendum), then Liechtenstein would have 18 months grace period to accept and implement new Dublin/Eurodac legislation
Norveška je imela za sprejetje in izvajanje nastajajočega pravnega reda Dublin/Eurodac na voljo 6 mesecev, Islandija 4 tedne in Švica 24 mesecev. , ki zajema dublinsko uredbo in uredbo Eurodac.
Norway had 6 months, Iceland had 4 weeks, Switzerland had 24 months in order to accept and implement the future Dublin/Eurodac acquis . .
Vseeno pa bi moral v tem obdobju, kjer je to mogoče, začasno izvajati omenjene akte in ukrepe.
However, in the meantime, Liechtenstein should, where possible, implement the act or measure in question on a provisional basis.
Komisija na podlagi člena 63(1)(a) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti predlaga sprejetje protokola.
The Commission proposes to adopt the Protocol based on Articles 63(1)a of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3) je o sklenitvi Protokola potrebno posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom.
The European Parliament is consulted on the conclusion of the Protocol in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 300(3)).
V dopisu z dne 21. marca 2007 je Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje, in notranje zadeve v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta zahteval mnenje Odbora za pravne zadeve o predlagani pravni podlagi.
By letter of 21 March 2007 the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs requested, in accordance with Rule 35(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, an opinion from the Legal Affairs Committee on the legal basis proposed.