natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(33) Običajno lahko konkurenčen trg najbolje zagotovi ustrezno ravnotežje med ravnijo varnosti in stroški za njeno doseganje ter med omejitvami zaradi varnostnih zahtev in svobodo razvijanja inovativnih storitev.
(33) A competitive market is usually the best means of ensuring that an appropriate balance is struck between the level of security and the costs of achieving it, and between the constraints imposed by security requirements and the freedom to develop innovative services.
Vendar je včasih potreben dogovor o skupnih varnostnih zahtevah, ki ščitijo pred splošnimi pogubnimi okvarami in pred okvarami na enem omrežju, ki bi kaskadno vplivale na druga omrežja, ter ki zagotavljajo razpoložljivost osnovnih storitev v nujnih primerih.
It sometimes remains necessary to agree on a common set of security requirements to protect against widespread catastrophic failure, to protect against incidents on one network having cascade effects on other network and to ensure the availability of essential services in case of emergency.
V skladu z načeloma nujnosti in sorazmernosti imajo nacionalni regulativni organi strogo omejena pooblastila, potrebna zgolj za uresničitev teh ciljev.
In accordance with the principles of necessity and proportionality, the national regulatory authorities are strictly limited to the powers necessary to achieve these objectives.
Regulatory intervention remains justified to ensure a minimum level of protection against catastrophe, to ensure that communications networks can provide support in cases of emergency, and to protect against "externality" effects in cases where one provider"s choices would adversely impact upon another.
Regulatory intervention remains justified to ensure a minimum level of protection against catastrophe, to ensure that communications networks can provide support in cases of emergency, and to protect against ‘externality’ effects in cases where one provider’s choices would adversely impact upon another.
(33a) Za upravljanje telefonskih omrežij in storitev je že iz preteklosti značilno mednarodno sodelovanje na visoki ravni, namenjeno usklajevanju tehničnih standardov in spodbujanju interoperabilnosti.
(33a) The management of telephony networks and services has historically been characterised by a high level of international cooperation designed to ensure harmonisation of technical standards and to promote interoperability.
Internet je interoperabilnost dosegel z globalnimi odprtimi standardi za medomrežna usmerjanja, razvoj storitev z uporabo interneta pa je bil odvisen od svobode pri ustvarjanju novih tehničnih standardov in protokolov brez regulativnih posegov; ta svoboda je pri uvajanju storitev informacijske družbe in drugih, nekomercialnih storitev omogočila inovacije brez primere ter Evropejcem prinesla ogromno gospodarskih in socialnih koristi.
The Internet has achieved interoperability through open global standards for inter-network routing, while the development of services using the Internet has depended upon the freedom to create new technical standards and protocols without regulatory intervention; this freedom has enabled unprecedented innovation in the creation of information society services and other, non-commercial services, yielding enormous economic and social gains for the people of Europe.
Nacionalni regulativni organi svojih pooblastil ne mi smeli uporabljati za spodbujanje usklajevanja v elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežjih tako, da bi omejili razvoj inovacij na internetu.
NRAs should not use powers to promote harmonisation in electronic communications networks in ways that would constrain the development of innovation on the Internet.
Uvodna izjava 33 b (novo)
Recital 33 b (new)
Te obveznosti jim nalagajo pričakovanja potrošnikov in tržno povpraševanje, nacionalni ukrepi, ta direktiva, Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah, Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/31/ES z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju) 1 , Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov 2 ter drugi ukrepi.
These obligations are imposed by customer expectations and market demand, by national measures, by this Directive, by the Directive on privacy and electronic communication, by Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce) 1 , by Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data 2 , and by other measures.
Ta direktiva regulativnim organom ne daje pooblastil za reguliranje storitev informacijske družbe ali podobnih storitev, ki se opravljajo brez plačila.
This Directive does not confer powers on regulatory authorities to regulate either information society services or similar services that are not provided for remuneration.
Nacionalni regulativni organi v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti ne smejo uporabiti pooblastil, ki so jih dobili s to direktivo, da bi ponudnikom elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij naložili obveznosti, povezane z varnostjo, ki niso v skladu z vlogo teh ponudnikov.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, national regulatory authorities should not use powers conferred under this Directive to impose obligations on providers of electronic communications networks for aspects of security outside their respective roles.
2 UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str.
2 OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
V predlogih Komisije ni jasno izraženo, da je regulativni poseg nujen.
The Commission’s proposals fail to provide any clear evidence that regulatory intervention is necessary.
Zlasti na področju varnosti je pomembno, da se vsak regulativni poseg podpre z jasno oceno učinka, ki je v tem primeru očitno ni.
It is particularly important in the area of security that any regulatory intervention is backed up with a clear impact assessment, which is clearly lacking in this case.
Namesto tega se od nacionalnih regulativnih organov, ki imajo zgolj pristojnosti in zmogljivosti za reguliranje upravljavcev omrežij, pričakuje, da bodo regulirali trg, ki ga večinoma sestavljajo industrije, nad katerimi nimajo nobenega nadzora (ponudniki programske opreme, strojne opreme, spletnih storitev itd.).
Instead, NRAs, which only have the competence and capacity to regulate network operators are now expected to regulate a market consisting, for the most part, of industries over which the exercise no control (software providers, hardware providers, online service providers, etc).
(39a) Treba je priznati potrebo po spodbujanju investicij in konkurenčnosti, s čimer se zaščiti, ne pa ogrozi, izbira potrošnikov.
(39a) The need to encourage both investment and competition should be recognised, so that consumer choice is protected and not undermined.
(s) ‚škodljive motnje‘ pomenijo motnje, ki ogrožajo delovanje radionavigacijske storitve ali drugih varnostnih storitev ali ki kako drugače resno ogrožajo, ovirajo ali nenehno prekinjajo radiokomunikacijsko storitev, ki deluje v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi Skupnosti ali nacionalnimi predpisi.“
(s) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades , obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable Community or national regulations.
(s) ‚škodljive motnje‘ pomenijo motnje, ki ogrožajo delovanje radionavigacijske storitve ali drugih varnostnih storitev , ki tehnično ovirajo skupno uporabo frekvenc ali ki lahko kako drugače resno ogrožajo, ovirajo ali nenehno prekinjajo radiokomunikacijsko storitev, ki deluje v skladu z veljavnimi mednarodnimi predpisi, predpisi Skupnosti ali nacionalnimi predpisi.
(s) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services , which technically obstructs the joint use of frequencies or which may otherwise seriously degrade , obstruct or repeatedly interrupt a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international , Community or national regulations .
Države članice morajo imeti možnost, da določijo omejitve ne samo za področja, kjer so bile zaznane takšne motnje, temveč tudi za področja, kjer obstaja možnost, da se pojavijo.
Member States should be able to provide restrictions not only where such interference has been observed but also where it is likely that harmful interference occurs.
Glede na resnost težav z motnjami med enosmernimi in dvosmernimi (prejetimi in oddajanimi) storitvami je bistveno, da so zaščitene pred škodljivimi motnjami v skladu z mednarodno sprejetimi frekvenčnimi načrti, zlasti z ženevskim načrtom ITU (GE-06).
In view of the seriousness of interference problems between one-way and two-way (receive and transmit) services, it is essential to provide protection against harmful interference, in line with internationally-agreed frequency plans, and particularly the ITU Geneva Plan (GE-O6).
V nacionalnih pravnih sistemih se mora najti prostor za skupno uporabo spektra.
National legal systems must have the room to secure the common usage of spectrum.
Člen 3 – odstavek 3 – alinea 1
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalni regulativni organi izvajajo svoja pooblastila neodvisno, nepristransko, pregledno in pravočasno .
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities exercise their powers independently, impartially , transparently and in a timely manner .
Države članice omejijo rok za obravnavo pritožb.
Member States shall set limits to the time allowed for consideration of such appeals.
Začasni ukrepi se lahko sprejmejo zaradi nujne potrebe po začasnem preklicu učinka odločbe, da se prepreči resno in nepopravljivo škodo za stranko, ki zahteva te ukrepe, in zaradi zahteve po ravnovesju interesov.“
Interim measures may be granted if there is an urgent need to suspend the effect of the decision in order to prevent serious and irreparable damage to the party applying for those measures and the balance of interests so requires.
Začasni ukrepi se lahko sprejmejo samo zaradi nujne potrebe po začasnem preklicu učinka odločbe, da se prepreči resno in nepopravljivo škodo za stranko, ki zahteva te ukrepe, in zaradi zahteve po ravnovesju interesov.“
Interim measures may only be granted if there is an urgent need to suspend the effect of the decision in order to prevent serious and irreparable damage to the party applying for those measures and the balance of interests so requires.
Nacionalni regulativni organ navede razloge, ki utemeljujejo njegovo zahtevo po informacijah.“
The national regulatory authority shall give the reasons justifying its request for information.
Podjetja tudi v naprej nakažejo vse bistvene možne omejitve veleprodajnih storitev, ki so na voljo konkurentom.
Undertakings shall also provide advance indication of any significant potential restriction of wholesale services that are made available to competitors.
Spoštovati je treba poslovno tajnost, kot je določena z nacionalnim pravom ali pravom Skupnosti. “
Commercial confidentiality, as provided for by national or Community law, must be respected.
Predlagani dodatek o informacijah o prihodnjem razvoju omrežja in storitev je problematičen, ker tovrstne informacije najverjetneje vsebujejo notranje informacije.
The proposed addition concerning information on future network and service development would be problematic because that kind of information would contain most likely inside information.
Prag za tovrstne zahteve bi moral biti zelo visok.
The threshold of such requirement should be very high.
V tem primeru ni jasno, kaj bi bil namen in dodana vrednost zahteve, naj operaterji organom predložijo tovrstne informacije.
In this case it is not clear what would be the purpose and the added value of requiring the operators to submit such information to authorities.
Vendar je zaželeno vnaprejšnje obveščanje o možnem vplivu na veleprodajni ravni.
However, some advance notice of potential impact at the wholesale level is desirable.
Jasno mora biti, da je treba spoštovati poslovno tajnost.
It needs to be clear that commercial confidentiality should be respected.
Člen 6 – alinea 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Nacionalni regulativni organ Komisiji sporoči vse končne ukrepe , ki spadajo pod pogoje a) in b) v členu 7(3).
The national regulatory authority shall communicate to the Commission all final measures which fall under conditions a) and b) in Article 7(3).
Nacionalni regulativni organ Komisiji sporoči vse končne ukrepe iz člena 7(3).
The national regulatory authority shall communicate to the Commission all final measures which fall under Article 7(3).
„(g) jih vodi načelo, da morajo imeti končni uporabniki pravico do dostopa do katere koli zakonite vsebine in do njenega razširjanja ter do uporabe katere koli zakonite aplikacije in/ali storitve po svoji izbiri.“
(g) applying the principle that end-users should be able to access and distribute any lawful content and use any lawful applications and/or services of their choice.
„(g) jih vodi načelo, da morajo imeti končni uporabniki pravico do dostopa do katere koli zakonite vsebine in do njenega razširjanja ter do uporabe katere koli zakonite aplikacije in/ali storitve po svoji izbiri , kot je s pogodbo dogovorjeno med ponudnikom in naročnikom .
(g) applying the principle that end-users should be able to access and distribute any lawful content and use any lawful applications and/or services of their choice as contractually agreed between the provider and the subscriber.
Nič, kar je povezano s tem načelom, ne njegova omemba ali izpust omembe v kakršni koli pogodbi, ne razveljavi določb Direktive 2001/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2001 o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi 1 . “
Nothing in that principle, nor the presence in or absence from any contract of any mention of that principle, shall have the effect of setting aside the provisions of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society 1 .
Člen 1 – točka 8 – pod-točka e a (novo)
Article 1 – point 8 – subpoint e a (new)
(8a) V odstavku 4 se doda naslednja točka:
(8a) In paragraph 4, the following point is added:
„(ga) zagotavljajo sodelovanje podjetij, ki so ponudniki omrežij elektronskih komunikacij, in zadevnih sektorjev za zaščito in spodbujanje zakonitih vsebin v elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežjih in storitvah.“
‘(ga) ensuring cooperation between undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services and the sectors concerned with the protection and the promotion of lawful content over electronic communications networks and services.’
Pri boju proti kršenju avtorskih pravic, ki v omrežjih eksponentno raste, morajo operaterji elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev nujno sodelovati.
The cooperation of electronic communications services operators is essential to combat the attacks on copyright which are increasing exponentially on networks.
Usklajevanje bi bilo treba zaupati organu, ki bo za to področje odgovoren na evropski ravni.
The authority responsible at European level should be given the task of coordinating these efforts.
Člen 9 – odstavek 3 – alinea 2 – točka c
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
c) zagotovitve največje souporabe radijskih frekvenc, če je uporaba frekvenc predmet splošne odobritve, ali
(c) ensure maximisation of radio frequencies sharing where the use of frequencies is subject to a general authorisation ; or
(c) zagotovitve učinkovite rabe radijskih frekvenc , vključno z največjo možno souporabo , kadar je mogoča , ali
(c) ensure efficient use of radio frequencies, including the maximisation of radio frequency sharing where possible ; or
Souporabo spektra bi bilo treba izkoristiti, kjer je tehnično izvedljiva in učinkovita, ob upoštevanju nasprotujočih si zahtev.
Spectrum sharing should be utilised where it is technically viable and efficient, taking the conflicting requirements into account.
Člen 9 – odstavek 3 – točka d a (novo)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(9a) Vstavi se naslednja točka:
(9a) The following point shall be inserted:
„(da) upoštevanja mednarodnih in regionalnih organizacij, povezanih s spektrom, ter spoštovanja mednarodno dogovorjenih frekvenčnih načrtov, ali“
‘(da) take account of international and regional spectrum organisations and respect internationally agreed frequency plans, or’
Evropa mora spoštovati mednarodne frekvenčne načrte (npr. ženevski načrt ITU (GE-06)), da se izogne nepotrebnim interferencam in neučinkovitemu tratenju mejnega spektra.
Europe must respect international frequency plans (e.g. the ITU Geneva Plan (GE-06)) to avoid unnecessary interference and inefficient waste of spectrum on its borders.
Člen 9 – odstavek 3 – točka d b (novo)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point d b (new)
(9b) Vstavi se naslednja točka:
(9b) The following point shall be inserted:
„(db) zagotovitve učinkovite uporabe spektra, ali“
‘(db) safeguard efficient use of spectrum.’
Člen 9 – odstavek 4 – alinea 1
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Razen če ni drugače določeno v drugem pododstavku ali v ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9c, države članice zagotovijo, da se v radiofrekvenčnih pasovih, odprtih za elektronske komunikacije , kot so opredeljene z nacionalnim načrtom dodeljevanja frekvenc in v pravilniku o radijskih frekvencah Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze , nudijo vse vrste elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph or in the measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c, Member States shall ensure that all types of electronic communications services may be provided in the radio frequency bands available to electronic communications as identified in their national frequency allocation tables and in the ITU Radio Regulations .
Nevtralnost storitev mora upoštevati pravilnik o radijskih frekvencah Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze, ki določa, katere storitve so lahko hkrati v posameznih pasovih.
Service neutrality should respect the ITU Radio Regulations that determine which services can coexist in the different bands.
Člen 9 c – alinea 2
Article 9 c – subparagraph 2
Komisiji lahko v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe […/ES] pri izvajanju določb tega odstavka pomaga organ .“
In the implementation of the provisions of this paragraph, the Commission may be assisted by the Authority in accordance with Article 10 Regulation […/EC] .
Komisiji lahko pri izvajanju določb tega odstavka pomagajo nacionalni regulativni organi .“
In the implementation of the provisions of this paragraph, the Commission may be assisted by the national regulatory authorities .
Člen 10 – odstavek 4 – alinea 1
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Komisija lahko v zvezi s tem sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe , ki lahko vključujejo vzpostavitev tarifnih načel za posebne številke ali številska območja .
The Commission may take appropriate technical implementing measures on this matter , which may include establishing tariff principles for specific numbers or number ranges .
Komisija lahko v zvezi s tem sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe.
The Commission may take appropriate technical implementing measures on this matter .
Izvedbeni ukrepi lahko Evropskemu uradu za radiokomunikacije (ERO) podelijo posebne odgovornosti pri uporabi teh ukrepov.
The implementing measures may grant the European Radio Communications Office (ERO) specific responsibilities in the application of those measures.
Pri številčenju morajo tarife ostati pristojnost držav članic.
Tariffs in numbering should remain a competence of Member States.
Organ ne bi smel imeti pristojnosti za številčenje, to pristojnost bi moral imeti Evropski urad za radiokomunikacije (ERO).
The Authority should not have competence in numbering and this should reside with the European Radio Communications Office (ERO).
Člen 13 a – odstavek 3 – alinea 3
Article 13 a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Nacionalni regulativni organ vsake tri mesece Komisiji predloži kratko poročilo o prejetih prijavah in o ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti v skladu s tem odstavkom.
Every three months, the national regulatory authority shall submit a summary report to the Commission on the notifications received and the action taken in accordance with this paragraph.
Nacionalni regulativni organ vsako leto Komisiji predloži kratko poročilo o prejetih prijavah in o ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti v skladu s tem odstavkom.
Every year the national regulatory authority shall submit a summary report to the Commission on the notifications received and the action taken in accordance with this paragraph.
Krepitev varnosti omrežij in informacij je eno od področij, kjer mora Skupnost okrepiti ukrepe in kjer bi predlagane spremembe gotovo prispevale k dodani vrednosti.
Reinforcing network and information security is one of the areas where more action at Community level is needed and where proposed amendments certainly could bring added value.
Edino problematično vprašanje v zvezi s tem zadeva obveznost poročanja, ki naj bi jo imeli nacionalni regulativni organi.
The only problematic issue in this context concerns the reporting obligation which is proposed for NRAs.
Člen 13 a – odstavek 4
Article 13 a – paragraph 4
Komisija, ki dosledno upošteva mnenje nacionalnih regulativnih organov , lahko sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe za uskladitev ukrepov iz odstavkov 1, 2 in 3, vključno z ukrepi, ki opredeljujejo okoliščine, obliko in postopke, ki se uporabljajo za obveznosti prijave.
The Commission, taking the utmost account of the opinion of the national regulatory authorities , may adopt appropriate technical implementing measures with a view to harmonising the measures referred to in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements.
Ti izvedbeni ukrepi, ki so namenjeni spremembam nebistvenih elementov te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo, se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 22(3) , kadar samoregulativne pobude industrije ne dosežejo ustrezne ravni varnosti na notranjem trgu v eni ali več državah članicah .
These implementing measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(3) and where industry-led self-regulatory initiatives have not achieved an adequate level of security in the internal market in one or more Member States .
Tehnični izvedbeni ukrepi naj se uvedejo zgolj, kadar samoregulativne pobude industrije ne dosežejo ustrezne ravni varnosti na notranjem trgu.
Technical implementing measures should only be introduced where industry self-regulatory initiatives have not achieved an adequate level of security in the internal market.
Člen 13 b
Article 13 b
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo ustrezni nacionalni regulativni organi pooblastilo za izdajo zavezujočih navodil podjetjem, ki zagotavljajo javna komunikacijska omrežja ali javno dostopne elektronske komunikacijske storitve, za namen izvajanja člena 13a.
Member States shall ensure that the relevant national regulatory authorities have the power to issue binding instructions to undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services in order to implement Article 13a.