natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato poročevalka priporoča, da sprejmemo predlog revizije iz člena 86 in njegovo zavezanost cilju, da bi skrajšali čas za odgovore.
Therefore, your Rapporteur recommends that we accept the review proposal in Article 86 and its commitment to the aim of shortening time taken for responses.
Poleg tega smo predlagali, da bi države članice vsaj ohranile svoje roke za obravnavo zahtev.
We had also proposed that Member States should at least keep to their own deadlines for dealing with requests.
Zdi se presenetljivo, da teh rokov nimajo vse, zato poročevalka predlaga novo uvodno izjavo, v kateri se ti ukrepi priporočajo.
Surprisingly it seems that not all Member States have such deadlines, hence your Rapporteur's proposal for a new recital recommending these measures.
To je seveda koordinacija, ne usklajevanje sistemov.
This is, of course, a coordination not harmonisation of systems.
Zato poročevalka z oklevanjem priznava, da morajo države članice same odločati o stroških spremljevalnih oseb za tiste, ki potujejo zaradi zdravstvenega varstva v okviru te uredbe in obstoječega sistema predhodnega dovoljenja.
So, your Rapporteur reluctantly recognises that it is for member States to decide on the payment of costs for accompanying persons for those travelling for healthcare under this Regulation and the existing system of prior authorisation.
Poleg tega bi z omembo plače na obrazcih lahko prišlo do navzkrižja z varstvom podatkov, kjer se spoštuje načelo omejitve na najnujnejše podatke.
Additionally, mentioning the salary on the forms might create a conflict as concerns data protection, where the principle of "limit to necessary data only" is upheld.
V splošnem poročevalka pozdravlja skupno stališče in upa, da bo mogoče pred koncem tega parlamentarnega mandata doseči dogovor, ki bi vključeval glavne ideje Parlamenta o tem dokumentu.
Generally, however, your Rapporteur welcomes the common position and trusts that an agreement can be found before the end of this parliamentary term that integrates the key ideas of Parliament on this file.
o parlamentarni imuniteti na Poljskem
on parliamentary immunity in Poland
– ob upoštevanju členov 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965,
– having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities,
– ob upoštevanju člena 12(3) Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami,
– having regard to Article 12(3) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju člena 105 ustave Republike Poljske z dne 2. aprila 1997,
– having regard to Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997,
– ob upoštevanju člena 7b poljskega zakona o izvrševanju mandata poslanca ali senatorja z dne 9. maja 1996,
– having regard to Article 7b of the Polish Law of 9 May 1996 on the performance of the mandate of deputy or senator,
– ob upoštevanju členov 9 in 142 poljskega zakona o volitvah v Evropski parlament z dne 23. januarja 2004,
– having regard to Articles 9 and 142 of the Polish Law of 23 January 2004 on the elections to European Parliament,
– ob upoštevanju členov 6 in 7 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 6 and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. junija 2005 o spremembi odločitve z dne 4. junija 2003 o sprejetju Statuta poslancev Evropskega parlamenta
– having regard to its resolution of 23 June 2005 on the amendment of the decision of 4 June 2003 on the adoption of the Statute for Members of the European Parliament
UL C 133, 8.6.2006, str.
OJ C 133 E, 8.6.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0205/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0205/2009 ),
A. ker sta v sedanjem parlamentarnem mandatu Parlament in Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor obravnavala zahteve za odvzem imunitete poslancem, izvoljenim na Poljskem, pri tem pa naletela na določene težave pri razlagi zakonskih določb, ki bi se lahko uporabljale v primeru teh poslancev,
A. whereas, in the current parliamentary term, Parliament and its Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, have considered requests for waiver of the immunity of Members elected in Poland and have come up against certain difficulties in the interpretation of provisions of law that might be applicable in the case of those Members,
B. ker je bil pristojni odbor pozvan, naj odloča zlasti o dopustnosti zahtev za odvzem imunitete, ki so jih pri predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta vložili neposredno posamezniki; ker imajo po poljski zakonodaji posamezniki pravico, da pri poljskem parlamentu (sejmu ali senatu) vložijo neposredno zahtevo za odvzem imunitete enega od poslancev v primeru kaznivih dejanj, ki so lahko predmet zasebnega sodnega pregona, in ker se zdi, da ustrezne določbe poljske zakonodaje ne upoštevajo jasno vseh mogočih scenarijev v primeru kazenskih postopkov v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ki so predmet zasebnega sodnega pregona,
B. whereas the responsible committee has been called upon, in particular, to decide on the admissibility of requests for waiver of immunity made directly by private persons to the President of the European Parliament; whereas under Polish law a private person has the right to make a direct request to the Polish Parliament ( Sejm or Senat ) to waive the immunity of one of its Members in the case of offences that may be the subject of a private prosecution, and whereas the relevant provisions of Polish law do not seem clearly to take account of all possible scenarios in the case of criminal proceedings relating to offences subject to private prosecution,
C. ker se te določbe uporabljajo tudi za poslance Evropskega parlamenta, izvoljene na Poljskem, vendar se v zvezi z dopustnostjo takšnih zahtev porajajo zapletena vprašanja glede Poslovnika, zlasti člena 6(2), ki se nanaša na „pristojni organ“,
C. whereas those provisions also apply to Members of the European Parliament elected in Poland, yet the admissibility of such requests raises difficult questions having regard to the Rules of Procedure, and in particular Rule 6(2) which refers to the "competent authority",
D. ker je po členu 7(7) Poslovnika pristojni odbor odgovoren za preverjanje dopustnosti zahtev za odvzem imunitete, vključno z vprašanjem pristojnosti nacionalnih organov, da predložijo takšne zahteve; ker pa bi se moral po obstoječih določbah očiten konflikt med ustreznimi določbami poljske zakonodaje in Poslovnika v zvezi s tem rešiti tako, da bi se zahteve za odvzem imunitete, ki jih vložijo posamezniki, štele kot nedopustne,
D. whereas under Rule 7(7) of the Rules of Procedure the responsible committee is competent to verify the admissibility of a request for waiver of immunity, including the question of the competence of the national authority to submit such a request; whereas, however, under the existing provisions the manifest conflict between the relevant provisions of Polish law and the Rules of Procedure in this regard would have to be resolved by considering requests for waiver of immunity by private persons as inadmissible,
E. ker je namen člena 6(2) zagotoviti, da Parlament prejme zahteve zgolj v postopkih, katerim so namenili pozornost organi države članice; ker ta člen tudi zagotavlja Parlamentu, da so zahteve za odvzem imunitete, ki jih prejme, v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, tako glede vsebine kot postopka, kar služi kot nadaljnje jamstvo, da bo Parlament pri sprejemanju odločitve v svojih postopkih o imuniteti upošteval tako nacionalno zakonodajo države članice kot svoje posebne pravice; ker se na koncept „organa“ jasno sklicujejo druge določbe členov 6 in 7 v zvezi s postopki o imuniteti,
E. whereas the purpose of Rule 6(2) is to guarantee that Parliament receives only requests in proceedings that have received the attention of the authorities of a Member State; whereas it also guarantees for Parliament that requests for waiver of immunity which are received by it comply with national law as regards both substance and procedure, which in turn serves as a further guarantee that, in reaching its decision in its procedures on immunities, Parliament observes both the national law of a Member State and its own prerogatives; whereas the concept of "authority" is clearly referred to in other provisions of Rules 6 and 7 in the context of the procedures on immunity,
F. ker ne bi bilo dovolj, če bi se zahteve za odvzem imunitete, ki jih vložijo posamezniki, štele kot nedopustne, saj bi to lahko posegalo v njihove pravice v sodnih postopkih in tožilcem za nekatera kazniva dejanja onemogočilo, da bi zahtevali odvzem imunitete; ker bi se to lahko zdelo kot spodbujanje nepravične in neenakopravne obravnave prijaviteljev,
F. whereas to regard requests for waiver of immunity made by private persons as inadmissible would be unsatisfactory in that it could interfere with their rights in judicial proceedings and preclude prosecutors of some offences from being able to request waiver of immunity; whereas this could be regarded as giving rise to unjust and unequal treatment of applicants,
G. ker pa bi morale biti države članice tiste, ki sprejmejo določbe za izvajanje teh pravic v zvezi s poslanci Evropskega parlamenta, glede na pravila in postopke, ki urejajo njegovo delovanje,
G. whereas, however, it should be for the Member States to make provision for the exercise of such rights with regard to Members of the European Parliament in the light of the rules and procedures governing its functioning,
H. ker je bilo 25 držav članic s pismi z dne 29. septembra 2004 in 9. marca 2005 v skladu s členom 7(12) pozvanih, naj navedejo, kateri organi so pristojni za predložitev zahteve za odvzem imunitete poslanca; ker so se doslej odzvale le Avstrija, Belgija, Ciper, Češka republika, Danska, Estonija, Finska, Grčija, Italija, Litva, Madžarska, Nemčija, Nizozemska, Portugalska, Slovenija, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo,
H. whereas, by letters of 29 September 2004 and 9 March 2005, 25 Member States were invited, pursuant to Rule 7(12), to indicate which authorities are competent to present a request for waiver of a Member's immunity; whereas to date only Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden and the UK have responded,
I. ker je pristojni odbor v svojih razpravah obravnaval tudi vprašanje morebitnih posledic odvzema imunitete v primeru poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, izvoljenih na Poljskem,
I. whereas in its debates the responsible committee also addressed the question of the possible consequences of a waiver of immunity in the case of Members of the European Parliament elected in Poland,
J. ker bi v primeru, da sodišče poslanca spozna za krivega in je kaznovan za naklepno kaznivo dejanje, ki se preganja po uradni dolžnosti, takšen odvzem lahko pomenil avtomatično izgubo pasivne volilne pravice, kar bi potem povzročilo, da poslanec izgubi svoj sedež,
J. whereas, in the event that the Member is found guilty by the court and punished for an intentional offence prosecuted by public prosecution, such waiver might result in the automatic loss of his or her eligibility, which would result in turn in the Member losing his or her seat,
K. ker ta avtomatizem dejansko pomeni, da je poleg obsodbe prisojena dodatna kazenska sankcija,
K. whereas this automatism amounts, de facto , to an additional penal sanction being adjudged together with conviction,
L. ker v praksi že lažja kazniva dejanja lahko vodijo do izgube pasivne volilne pravice, kljub zahtevi, da se mora kaznivo dejanje preganjati po uradni dolžnosti in mora biti storjeno naklepno, da povzroči izgubo pasivne volilne pravice,
L. whereas in practice even minor offences might result in a loss of eligibility, despite the requirement that in order for an offence to give rise to ineligibility it must be both publicly prosecuted and committed intentionally,
M. ker ni ustrezne določbe, ki bi se uporabljala za poslance poljskega sejma ali senata , ki v tem primeru ne izgubijo pasivne volilne pravice,
M. whereas there is no equivalent provision applicable to Members of the Polish Sejm or Senat , who do not cease to be eligible for election in such cases,
N. ker države članice lahko sprejmejo določbe za razrešitev poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, in se posledično sprosti sedež poslanca; ker pa načelo enakega obravnavanja kot eno temeljnih načel zakonodaje EU zahteva, da se podobne razmere obravnavajo na podoben način, in ker v zvezi z izgubo pasivne volilne pravice obstaja očitno razlikovanje pri obravnavanju poslancev poljskega sejma in senata na eni strani in poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, izvoljenih na Poljskem, na drugi strani; ker izguba pasivne volilne pravice neposredno in avtomatično vodi do izgube sedeža tega poslanca in mu prepreči ponovno izvolitev,
N. whereas Member States are free to make a provision for the withdrawal of the mandate of a Member of the European Parliament where, as a result, the seat of the Member falls vacant; whereas, however, the principle of equal treatment, as one of the basic principles of EU law, requires that similar situations be treated in similar ways and there is an apparent differentiation in treatment of the Members of Polish Sejm and Senat , on the one hand, and Members of the European Parliament elected in Poland, on the other, when it comes to loss of eligibility; whereas that loss of eligibility results directly and automatically in the Member concerned losing his or her seat and prevents him or her from being re-elected,
O. ker je bila Komisija na to neenako obravnavanje opozorjena z vprašanjem za ustni odgovor, ki ga je v imenu Odbora za pravne zadeve predstavil predsednik odbora, o njem pa se je razpravljalo v Evropskem parlamentu; ker pravni položaj kljub temu ostaja nespremenjen,
O. whereas this inequality of treatment was brought to the Commission's attention by an oral question presented on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs by its Chairman and was debated in the European Parliament; whereas, notwithstanding this, the legal situation remains as it was,
P. ker bi bilo treba čim prej zagotoviti enako obravnavanje poslancev nacionalnega parlamenta in poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, zlasti zaradi prihajajočih volitev leta 2009,
P. whereas equal treatment of Members of the national parliament and Members of the European Parliament should be secured as soon as possible, particularly in view of the coming elections in 2009,
2. posebej poziva Republiko Poljsko, naj preuči sedanje razmere, v katerih pogoji za pasivno volilno pravico in prenehanje mandata poslancev obeh parlamentov očitno niso enaki, in sprejme ukrepe, da se konča to diskriminatorno obravnavanje;
Separately asks the Republic of Poland to review the current situation in which conditions of eligibility and loss of mandate of Members of two parliamentary assemblies are clearly unequal, and to take steps to put an end to this discriminatory treatment;
4. poziva države članice, naj spoštujejo pravice, ki izhajajo iz državljanstva EU, vključno s pravico do glasovanja in kandidiranja na volitvah v Evropski parlament, ki je še posebej pomembna v luči volitev leta 2009, vključno z načelom enakega obravnavanja oseb v podobnem položaju;
Calls on the Member States to respect the rights deriving from EU citizenship, including the right to vote and stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament, which is of particular importance in the run-up to the 2009 elections, including the principle of equal treatment of persons in a similar situation;
6. da bi se izognili morebitnim dvomom, poziva države članice, naj Parlamentu sporočijo, kateri organi so pristojni za predložitev zahtev za odvzem imunitete poslanca;
In order to avoid any doubt, invites the Member States to indicate to Parliament the authorities which are competent to present requests for waiver of a Member's immunity;
8. naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the European Ombudsman and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
V tem parlamentarnem mandatu je Parlament obravnaval vrsto zahtev za odvzem imunitete poslancev, izvoljenih na Poljskem.
In the course of the current parliamentary term, Parliament has considered a certain number of requests for the waiver of the immunity of Members elected in Poland.
Pri obravnavanju teh zahtev je Odbor za pravne zadeve naletel na težave pri razlagi zakonskih določb, ki bi se lahko uporabljale v primeru teh poslancev.
In considering those requests, the Committee on Legal Affairs came up against difficulties in the interpretation of provisions of law that might be applicable in the case of those Members.
Pristojni obor je bil pozvan, naj odloča zlasti o dopustnosti zahtev za odvzem imunitete, ki so jih vložili posamezniki, in naj preuči vprašanje poslancev, ki jim je bila odvzeta imuniteta in jim je morda prenehal mandat poslanca Evropskega parlamenta kot posledica kazenskega pregona, ki se je končal z obsodbo.
In particular the responsible committee has been called upon to decide on the admissibility of requests for waiver of immunity made by private persons and to review the question of Members who had their immunity waived possibly forfeiting their office as MEPs as a result of a criminal prosecution resulting in a conviction.
Namen poročila je pregledati določbe, ki se uporabljajo za imunitete, in splošna načela, ki jih je v zvezi s tem uvedel Parlament.
The purpose of this report is to collate the provisions applicable to immunities and the general principles established by the Parliament in this respect.
Prav tako preučuje posebnosti imunitet poslancev, izvoljenih na Poljskem.
It also analyses the particularities of the immunities of Members elected in Poland.
PARLAMENTARNA IMUNITETA POSLANCEV EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
PARLIAMENTARY IMMUNITY OF MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
Določbe, ki se uporabljajo za imunitete
Provisions applicable to immunities
Imunitete poslancev Parlamenta so določene v členih 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti (PPI)
The immunities of Members of the Parliament are set forth in Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities (PPI)
Razsodba v zadevi o odgovornosti uradnih predstavnikov Skupnosti glede davkov na premoženje je jasno opredelila, da kršitev določil PPI predstavlja kršitev obveznosti iz pogodb (sodba z dne 24. februarja 1988 v zadevi 260/86 Komisija proti Belgiji [1988] ECR 966). .
A judgment in a case concerning liability of Community officials to property tax makes it clear that a breach of the provisions of the PPI constitutes a breach of the obligations arising out of the Treaties (judgment of 24 February 1988 in Case 260/86 Commission v. Belgium [1988] ECR 966). .
Postopek v Evropskem parlamentu urejata člena 6 in 7 Poslovnika.
The procedure to be followed by the Parliament is laid down in Rules 6 and 7 of its Rules of Procedure.
Določbe poljske zakonodaje, ki se uporabljajo za parlamentarne imunitete poslancev, izvoljenih na Poljskem
Provisions of Polish law applicable to parliamentary immunities of Members elected in Poland
Obseg parlamentarne imunitete na Poljskem je zelo podoben tistemu iz PPI.
The scope of parliamentary immunity in Poland is very similar to that of the immunity provided in the PPI.
Člen 105 ustave Republike Poljske z dne 2. aprila 1997 se glasi:
Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 reads as follows:
Člen 105
Article 105
Podrobna načela in postopki, kot je določeno v členu 105(6) ustave, so bili uzakonjeni v zakonu o izvrševanju mandata poslanca ali senatorja z dne 9. maja 1996 (UL št. 221/2003, točka 2199, kot je bila spremenjena) („zakon o mandatu“).
Detailed principles and procedures as provided for in Article 105(6) of the Constitution have been enacted in the Law of 9 May 1996 on the performance of the mandate of deputy or senator (OJ No 221/2003, item 2199, as amended) ("Law on the Mandate").
Členi 6 do 7b zakona o mandatu, ki so še posebno pomembni za to poročilo, se glasijo:
Articles 6 to 7b of the Law on the Mandate, which are of particular relevance for this report, read as follows:
Člen 6
" Article 6
Poslanec ali senator ne odgovarja za dejanja v zvezi z izvrševanjem svojega mandata, ne v času mandata ne po njegovem izteku, ob upoštevanju določb člena 6a.
A deputy or senator shall not be held accountable for acts related to the performance of his mandate, either during that mandate or after its expiry, subject to the provisions of Article 6a.
Poslanec ali senator za takšna dejanja odgovarja samo pred sejmom ali senatom.
A deputy or senator shall be held accountable for such acts only before the Sejm or the Senate.
Akti, navedeni v odstavku 1, vključujejo predloge, govore ali glasovanja med zasedanji sejma, senata ali državnega zbora ali njihovih organov, med zasedanji skupin in združenj poslancev ali senatorjev ali med parlamentarnimi zasedanji, pa tudi druge akte v zvezi z opravljanjem njihovih dolžnosti.
The acts referred to in paragraph 1 shall include proposals, speeches or votes during sessions of the Sejm, Senate or National Assembly or their bodies, during meetings of groups and associations of deputies or senators, or during parliamentary meetings, as well as other acts related to the performance of their duties.
Za akte, navedene v odstavku 1, je poslanec ali senator disciplinsko ali finančno odgovoren v skladu z določbami, opredeljenimi z zakonom ali poslovnikom sejma ali senata.
For the acts referred to in paragraph 1, a deputy or senator shall bear disciplinary or financial responsibility in accordance with the provisions laid down by law and by the Rules of Procedure of the Sejm or the Senate.
Poslanec ali senator, ki v času dogodka v zvezi z opravljanjem svojih dolžnosti krši pravice tretje strani, lahko za to odgovarja pred sodiščem le z dovoljenjem sejma ali senata.
A deputy or senator who, in the course of an act relating to the performance of his duties infringes the rights of third parties may be held accountable before the courts only with the authorisation of the Sejm or the Senate.
Zahtevo za odobritev uvedbe kazenskega postopka zoper poslanca ali senatorja v primeru kaznivega dejanja, ki se preganja po uradni dolžnosti, se vloži s posredovanjem državnega tožilstva ministrstva za pravosodje.
The application for authorisation to bring criminal proceedings against a deputy or senator in the event of an offence subject to public prosecution shall be made through the intermediary of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Ministry of Justice.
Zahtevo za odobritev uvedbe kazenskega postopka zoper poslanca ali senatorja v primeru kaznivega dejanja, ki se preganja na zasebno tožbo, vloži zasebni tožilec, ko je bila zadeva predložena sodišču.
An application for authorisation to bring criminal proceedings against a deputy or senator in the event of an offence subject to private prosecution shall be lodged by the private prosecuting party, once the matter has been referred to the courts.''
Sčasoma so se iz razprav Parlamenta kot odziv na zahteve za odvzem imunitete poslancev oblikovala splošna načela.
Over the years, certain general principles have emerged from Parliament's deliberations in response to requests for the waiver of immunity of its Members.
Priznana so bila v resoluciji, sprejeti na zasedanju 10. marca 1987
They were given recognition in the resolution adopted at the sitting of 10 March 1987
44. na podlagi poročila Donneza ( A2–121/86 ).
44. on the basis of Mr Donnez's report ( A2–121/86 ).