natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
B. ker ima po členu 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah "vsakdo ... pravico, da institucije in organi Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku",
B. whereas, under Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, 'every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union',
C. ker ima po 1. odstavku člena 195 Pogodbe o ES in po členu 43 Listine o temeljnih pravicah "vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic…pravico, da se glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij in organov Skupnosti obrne na varuha človekovih pravic Unije, razen glede Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje v njuni pravosodni funkciji'',
C. whereas, under Article 195(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, 'any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role',
D. ker je zaradi vedno bolj participativne demokracije v Evropi in boljšega informiranja državljanov Evropske unije o njej nujno, da državljani dobijo od institucij in evropskih organov hitre in konkretne odgovore na svoja vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije, ter ker je bistveno, da imajo te institucije in organi na voljo potrebna proračunska sredstva in človeške vire, da bi se zagotovilo, da državljani dejansko prejmejo hitre in konkretne odgovore,
D. whereas it is essential, in the context of increasing participatory democracy in Europe and of better communicating the European Union to its citizens, that citizens receive from the European institutions and bodies prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions, and whereas it is essential that those institutions and bodies be given the necessary budgetary and human resources to ensure that citizens receive such prompt and substantive responses,
E. ker se druge glavne institucije Unije kljub temu, da je minilo poldrugo mandatno obdobje od sprejetja resolucije, s katero je Parlament 6. septembra 2001 sprejel Evropski kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, še niso odzvale na nujen poziv, da svojo prakso uskladijo z določbami omenjenega kodeksa,
E. whereas, although one parliament has come to an end since the adoption of the resolution of 6 September 2001 in which Parliament approved the European Ombudsman's Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, and the next parliament is half-way through its term, the other main Union institutions have not yet complied with Parliament's urgent request to bring their practice into line with the provisions of that code,
F. ker več kot tri četrtine pritožb v letu 2006 ni sodilo v obseg pooblastil varuha človekovih pravic, v glavnem zato, ker niso bile usmerjene zoper institucijo ali organ Skupnosti, čeprav se je število pritožb ustalilo na že prej visoki stopnji iz leta 2004,
F. whereas in 2006, although the number of complaints stabilised at the high level reached in 2004, over three-quarters of them still fell outside the Ombudsman's remit, mainly because they did not concern a Community institution or body,
G. ker iz opravljenih preiskav izhaja, da v 95 primerih (oziroma v 26 % obravnavanih primerov) ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti nepravilnosti,
G. whereas, in 95 cases (or 26% of the cases examined) the Ombudsman's enquiries revealed no maladministration,
H. ker morajo ostati dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic in Odbora za peticije ločene in se morata v splošnem vzajemno obveščati o zadevah z dokončnim učinkom, da se preprečijo spori v zvezi s pristojnostjo,
H. whereas the activities of the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions must remain separate and as a general rule, to avoid conflicts as regards their respective prerogatives, should include reciprocal definitive referral of their respective files,
I. ker je leta 2006 znatno upadlo število primerov nepravilnosti, ki so bile rešene sporazumno, po drugi strani pa se je precej povečalo število preiskav, ki so se končale s kritičnimi pripombami in je bil pozitiven vpliv osnutkov priporočil na institucije manjši,
I. whereas the year 2006 saw a significant decline in the number of cases of maladministration in which a friendly solution was reached, accompanied by an equally striking rise in the number of enquiries closed with a critical remark, and a lower rate of acceptance of the Ombudsman's draft recommendations by the institutions,
J. ker kritične pripombe, ki jih vsebujejo sklepi ob nerazrešljivih primerih nepravilnosti, in priporočila ter morebitna posebna poročila niso zavezujoča, saj obsegajo pooblastila varuha človekovih pravic področje spodbujanja samonadzora institucij in organov Evropske unije, ne sežejo pa na neposredno odpravljanje primerov nepravilnosti,
J. whereas neither the critical remarks contained in decisions closing irremediable cases of maladministration, nor recommendations or special reports by the Ombudsman have binding effect, as his powers do not extend to directly remedying instances of maladministration, but are intended to encourage self-regulation on the part of the European Union's institutions and bodies,
K. ker je predstavitev posebnega poročila v Evropskem parlamentu edina možnost posredovanja v primeru, ko institucija noče upoštevati priporočil varuha človekovih pravic,
K. whereas submitting a special report to the European Parliament remains the Ombudsman's ultimate means of taking action when an institution refuses to comply with a recommendation by the Ombudsman,
L. ker ima od začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe iz Nice Parlament enako pravico kot države članice, Svet in Komisija, da se obrne na Sodišče evropskih skupnosti zaradi nepristojnosti, bistvene kršitve postopka, kršitev Pogodbe o ES ali katerega koli pravnega pravila, ki se nanaša na njeno uporabo, ali zaradi zlorabe pooblastil.
L. whereas since the entry into force of the Treaty of Nice Parliament has enjoyed the same right as the Member States, the Council and the Commission to bring an action before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the EC Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers,
M. ker je leta 2006 varuh človekovih pravic, ko je Parlamentu predstavil dve posebni poročili po tem, ko sta Svet in Komisija zavrnila pomemben osnutek priporočila, svoja pooblastila uporabljal premišljeno,
M. whereas in 2006 the Ombudsman, by submitting two special reports to Parliament after the rejection of the relevant draft recommendation by the Council and the Commission, made judicious use of his powers,
N. ker se nov pristop varuha človekovih pravic do Komisije sklada s spodbujanjem storitvene kulture kot sestavnega dela prakse dobrega upravljanja in je nepogrešljivo sredstvo za spreminjanje nepravilnega dejanja ali ravnanja v ustrezno ter ga je treba izvajati razvejano na podlagi soglasja,
N. whereas the Ombudsman's new approach to the Commission, which consists of promoting a culture of service as an integral component of good administrative practice and a key means of remedying flawed actions or conduct, must be implemented from the bottom up on a consensual basis,
O. ker lahko kritične pripombe Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v 41 primerih slabega upravljanja iz poročila za leto 2006 (kritične pripombe, osnutki priporočil in posebna poročila) služijo tudi za to, da se v prihodnosti ne bi ponovile napake in nepravilnosti, tako da institucije in druge organizacije EU sprejmejo in izvajajo potrebne ukrepe,
O. whereas the critical comments voiced by the European Ombudsman in respect of 41 cases of maladministration contained in the 2006 report (critical observations, draft recommendations and special reports) may serve as a basis for avoiding a repetition of errors and malfunctions in future by the taking and implementation of appropriate measures by the institutional and other bodies of the EU,
P. ker prostovoljno sodelovanje, ki ga je uvedel varuh človekovih pravic pod okriljem evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic, že več kot deset let deluje kot prožen sistem izmenjave informacij, izkušenj o najboljših upravnih praksah in za usmerjanje prijaviteljev k varuhu človekovih pravic ter k drugim podobnim organizacijam, ki jim lahko bolje pomagajo,
P. whereas the voluntary cooperation established by the Ombudsman in the European Network of Ombudsmen has functioned for over ten years as a flexible system for exchanging information and best practice and as a means of directing complainants to the Ombudsmen or other similar bodies most able to assist them,
Q. ker se je vloga varuha človekovih pravic, to je varovanje evropskih državljanov, po več kot desetletju od začetka delovanja razvijala zaradi njegove neodvisnosti in demokratičnega nadzora nad preglednostjo njegovega delovanja, ki ga izvaja Evropski parlament,
Q. whereas the role of Ombudsman charged with protecting European citizens has evolved in the decade or more since the office was created, thanks to the Ombudsman's independence and the European Parliament's democratic scrutiny of the transparency of his activities,
R. ker je varuh človekovih pravic izjavil, da je pripravljen uporabiti svojo pristojnost, da lahko na lastno pobudo izvaja preiskavo, kadar državljani tretjih držav izven Evropske unije pri varuhu človekovih pravic vložijo pritožbo, ki sicer sodi v okvir njegovih pooblastil,
R. whereas the Ombudsman has declared that he is willing to use his powers of own-initiative inquiries when third-country citizens resident outside the EU address a complaint to the Ombudsman which in other respects falls within his mandate,
S. ker sta varuh človekovih pravic in Evropski nadzornik za varstvo osebnih podatkov 30. novembra 2006 podpisala Memorandum o soglasju v zvezi s sodelovanjem in načinom izvajanja svojih pooblastil,
S. whereas on 30 November 2006 the Ombudsman and the Data Protection Supervisor signed a Memorandum of Understanding concerning cooperation and the modalities of the exercise of their respective powers,
T. ker je med vodilnimi načeli evropskega vključevanja tudi načelo demokratične enakosti vseh evropskih državljanov brez narodnostne ali jezikovne diskriminacije, in ker državljani, organizacije in podjetja še vedno vlagajo številne pritožbe, ker v postopkih za oddajo javnega naročila oziroma razpisnih postopkih Skupnosti niso dobili zahtevanih informacij v svojem jeziku,
T. whereas one of the fundamental principles of European integration is the democratic equality of all European citizens, without any discrimination on the grounds of nationality or language, and there are still numerous complaints from citizens, associations or firms about their failure to receive the information they requested in their own language in connection with Community tender or competition procedures,
U. ker je varuh človekovih pravic julija 2006 ponovno vložil zahtevo za revizijo svojega statuta in ker je Evropski parlament 6. septembra 2001 na podlagi omenjene resolucije že sprejel del njegovih zahtev, ki zadevajo spremembo člena 3 tega statuta,
U. whereas the Ombudsman reiterated, in July 2006, his call for the Statute of the Ombudsman to be amended and whereas one of his requests, for the amendment of Article 3 of the statute, had already been approved by the European Parliament on the basis of its abovementioned resolution of 6 September 2001,
3. meni, da je varuh človekovih pravic še naprej opravljal dejavnosti v okviru svojih pooblastil uravnoteženo in dinamično, kar velja za pregled pritožb, potek in zaključek preiskav, ohranjanje konstruktivnih odnosov z institucijami in organi Evropske unije ter osveščanje državljanov, da od teh institucij in organizacij zahtevajo spoštovanje svojih pravic;
Considers that the Ombudsman has continued to exercise his powers in a balanced and energetic way both with regard to examining and handling complaints, and conducting and concluding enquiries, and with regard to maintaining constructive relations with the European Union's institutions and bodies and encouraging citizens to avail themselves of their rights in relation to those institutions and bodies;
5. poudarja, da je glavni namen posredovanja varuha človekovih pravic, da poišče sporazumno spravo med pritožnikom in institucijo ter tako prepreči spor pred sodiščem;
Stresses that a key purpose of any intervention by the Ombudsman is to seek a friendly settlement between the complainant and the institution and prevent a dispute before the courts;
7. spodbuja varuha človekovih pravic, naj si še naprej prizadeva za pristno storitveno kulturo kot sestavni del dobre upravne prakse, da se zagotovi pripravljenost javne uprave Evropske unije na odprtost in dialog z državljani-uporabniki, na priznavanje napak, na opravičilo zanje ter na iskanje zadovoljivih rešitev za pritožnika;
Encourages the Ombudsman to continue to promote a genuine culture of service as an integral component of good administrative practice in order to ensure that the European Union's public administration is geared towards openness and dialogue with members of the public using their services, recognising and apologising for mistakes and seeking satisfactory solutions for complainants;
10. poudarja, da je varuh človekovih pravic učinek veljavnosti kodeksa za vse pojasnil v pismu predsedniku Parlamenta z 11. marca 2002, ki je tudi objavljeno na spletni strani varuha človekovih pravic; zato meni, da kakršen koli veljaven kodeks v opisanem okviru ne more nadomestiti ali razveljaviti ''evropskega'';
Stresses that the code's erga omnes effectiveness was explained by the Ombudsman in his letter of 11 March 2002 to the President of Parliament, which is published on the Ombudsman's website; considers, therefore, that no other code with more limited application may replace, or derogate from, the 'European' code of conduct;
13. spodbuja vse, ki so jim kritične pripombe namenjene, naj jih upoštevajo in naj se po njih v prihodnosti ravnajo, da se izognejo neskladju med uradnimi izjavami in upravnimi akti ali opustitvami;
Urges all those who are the subject of critical remarks to respect and take account of those remarks in their future actions, so as to avoid any instances of inconsistency between official pronouncements and administrative actions or failures to act;
14. vse institucije in organe Skupnosti opozarja na obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz izvajanja Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta s 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije
14 Reminds all Community institutions and bodies of their obligations under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents
UL L 145 z 31.5.2001. stran 43. , ki jo je treba dejansko izvajati, da bi bil verodostojen tudi predlog njene revizije ob pregledu, ter na obveznosti iz Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta s 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in prostem pretoku takih podatkov
OJ L145 of 31.5.2001,p.43 , which must be effectively applied, not least to ensure the credibility of the proposed revision thereof which is currently under consideration, and their obligations under Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
16. meni, da lahko varuh človekovih pravic zakonito uporabi možnost sodnega postopka pred sodiščem v zvezi z dejanjem ali opustitvijo iz svojega priporočila, kadar institucija noče upoštevati priporočila iz posebnega poročila varuha človekovih pravic, čeprav ga je potrdil parlament;
Considers that, if an institution refuses to follow a recommendation in a special report by the Ombudsman even though Parliament has approved that recommendation, Parliament could legitimately use its powers to bring an action before the Court of Justice in respect of the act or omission which was the subject of the Ombudsman's recommendation;
22. je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je varuh človekovih pravic predstavil dve posebni poročili; eno je že imelo koristen učinek, drugo pa bo obravnaval Parlament; v zvezi s tem meni, da so sklepi varuha človekovih pravic v zvezi s Svetom o tem, da je treba uporabljati predpise, skladne z jezikovnimi ureditvami v predsedstvih Sveta, in da je treba pojasniti položaj predsedstva kot dela Sveta v njegovi institucionalni vlogi;
Notes that the Ombudsman has presented two special reports, one of which has already achieved its intended purpose and the other of which will be examined by Parliament; supports the conclusions addressed by the Ombudsman to the Council concerning the need to apply consistent rules on the language regimes used by the Council Presidencies and on the need to clarify the status of the Presidency as part of the Council as an institution;
Kultura storitev za državljane
The culture of service to the citizen
Pred dvema letoma je urad Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic praznoval desetletnico delovanja.
Two years ago, the office of European Ombudsman celebrated its first decade.
Odbor za peticije EP, ki je letos praznoval dvajsetletnico ustanovitve po Enotnem evropskem aktu, priznava, da je evropsko državljanstvo po maastrichtski pogodbi naredilo kvalitativni preskok ter je sedaj mogoče predložiti peticijo parlamentarnemu organu, ki o njej edini razsoja, ali pa se državljan lahko obrne na bolj tehnični organ, ki sledi postopku, iz katerega ni izključen parlamentarni nadzor v primeru, ko institucija Skupnosti, ki je za nepravilnosti odgovorna, zavrne sodelovanje, čeprav omenjeni organ deluje na izvensodnem področju.
The Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament, which this year marked the 20th anniversary as a directly elected Parliament under the Single Act, recognises that the Treaty of Maastricht produced a qualitative leap in the rights of European citizenship by offering citizens the possibility of submitting petitions to a parliamentary body, which remains the sole arbitrator, or applying to a more specialised body which, while operating on an extrajudicial basis, follows a procedure, not excluding parliamentary intervention in the event of the Community institution responsible for the instance of maladministration proving reluctant to cooperate.
Na ravni Skupnosti se je spodbujala in krepila kultura storitev za državljane, katere cilj je kakovostna javna uprava – pregledna, dostopna, hitra in sodelujoča, zaradi skupnih prizadevanj Odbora za peticije in varuha človekovih pravic, njen prvi pojav pa lahko povežemo z resolucijo s 6. septembra 2001, ko je Evropski parlament sprejel kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev, ki ga je predlagal Evropski varuh človekovih pravic.
The culture of service to the citizen which is designed to ensure high quality - i.e. transparent, approachable, swift and cooperative administrative services - has been encouraged and strengthened at Community level by the combined efforts of the Committee on Petitions and the Ombudsman, and its first emergence can be traced back to the resolution of 6 September 2001, the date on which the European Parliament adopted the code of good administrative contact proposed by the European Ombudsman.
Pregled statističnih podatkov
Examination of the statistics
Leta 2006 je varuh človekovih pravic prejel 3830 pritožb, kar je 2 % manj kot leta 2005, vendar enako kot – v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti – rekordnem letu 2004 (+53 %).
The figures for 2006 record that the Ombudsman received 3830 complaints, 2% fewer than in 2005, but at the same record level attained in 2004, which represented a 53% increase compared to previous years.
V 57 % primerov je bila pritožba poslana po elektronski poti, večino pritožb, 3619, so vložili posamezni državljani in samo 211 organizacije ali podjetja.
A complaint was transmitted electronically in 57% of cases, most of which, i.e. 3619 cases, were sent by individual citizens, and only 211 of which were submitted by associations or firms.
Glede na državljanstvo lahko pritožnike razvrstimo v padajočem vrstnem redu na: španske (20,4%), nemške (14%), francoske (8,7%), belgijske (6,3%), poljske (6%), italijanske (5,4%), britanske (3,8%).
The nationality of the authors, in descending order was: Spanish (20.4%), German (14%), French (8.7%), Belgian (6.3%), Polish (6%), Italian (5.4%) and British (3.8%).
Vendar se lestvica spremeni, če delež vloženih pritožb v neki državi delimo z odstotnim deležem prebivalcev EU, ki ga predstavlja država.
This ranking changes, however, if the percentage of complaints submitted by a country is divided by the percentage of the EU population it represents.
Kar zadeva jezik, delež pritožb v angleščini in španščini presega 20 %, v nemščini in francoščini 10 %, v poljščini 5 %.
Turning to the question of language distribution of complaints, English and Spanish each account for over 20% of complaints , German and French each account for over 10% and Polish for over 5% .
Kar zadeva sprejemljivost, med 95 % že obravnavanih primerov prevladujejo taki, ki presegajo pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic ( 78,5 %), saj pritožbe bodisi ne zadevajo institucije ali organa Skupnosti ( 93,7 % ) ali pa niso v zvezi z domnevnimi nepravilnostmi ( 5,4 %).
In the 95% of cases where the examination of admissibility was completed, once again the majority did not fall within the mandate of the European Ombudsman ( 78.5%) , either because the complaints were not made against a Community institution or body ( 93.7% ) or because they did not involve maladministration ( 5.4% ).
Med primeri, za katere je pristojen varuh človekovih pravic ( 21,5 % ), je bilo 449 od 838 pritožb uradno sprejemljivih, 258 od teh pa je sledila preiskava .
Of the 21.5% of cases which did fall within the Ombudsman's remit, 449 of the 838 complaints were formally declared admissible, of which 258 led to an inquiry.
Varuh človekovih pravic je leta 2006 skupaj izvedel 582 preiskav, od katerih je 315 že potekalo leta 2005 in jih je 9 sprožil na lastno pobudo.
In 2006, the Ombudsman carried out 582 enquiries in total, of which 315 were already underway in 2005 and 9 were launched on the Ombudsman's own initiative.
Enako kot v prejšnjih letih so preiskave proti Komisiji skupaj znesle 66 % (387), proti Evropskemu uradu za izbor osebja 13 % (74), sledil je Evropski parlament z 8 % (49) in Svet Evropske unije z 2 % (11).
As in previous years, the institutional body which was the subject of most enquiries was the Commission, which accounted for 66% of enquiries (387); the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) accounted for 13% (74) the European Parliament for 8% (49) and the Council of the European Union for 2% (11).
Piramida primerov nepravilnosti obsega pomanjkljivo preglednost, ki vključuje odklanjanje posredovanja informacij ( 25% ), nepravičnost in zlorabo položaja ( 19 % ) in primere sodne zmote ( 5 % ) ter primere, ko Komisija ne izpolnjuje vloge ''varuha Pogodbe'' ( 4 % ).
The predominant type of maladministration alleged was lack of transparency, including refusal of information ( 25% ) followed by unfairness or abuse of power ( 19% ) and a variety of other types of maladministration, culminating in the least-frequently alleged categories of legal error ( 5% ) and failure to ensure fulfilment of Treaty obligations by the Commission ( 4% ).