natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
19. ugotavlja, da ima EKČP pomembno vlogo pri razlagi Listine o temeljnih pravicah, saj se morajo pravice, zajamčene z listino in ki se ujemajo s pravicami, priznanimi z EKČP, razlagati v skladu z EKČP in se v skladu s členom 6(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji Sodišče pri oblikovanju splošnih načel prava Unije zgleduje po EKČP; prav tako ugotavlja, da se EKČP, v skladu z njenim členom 53, ne sme razlagati kot da omejuje ali ogroža pravice, ki jih priznava Listina o temeljnih pravicah, ki ohranja vso svojo pravno veljavnost;
19 Notes that the ECHR has an important function in connection with the interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as rights guaranteed by the Charter which correspond to rights recognised by the ECHR must be interpreted in accordance with the Convention and as, by virtue of Article 6(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the ECHR constitutes a source of inspiration for the Court of Justice of the European Union in the formulation of general principles of Union law; notes likewise that, pursuant to Article 53 of the ECHR, the Convention cannot be interpreted as limiting or adversely affecting the rights recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights, so that the latter retains its full legal force;
21. poudarja, da bo tak pristop najprej in predvsem prispeval k skladnejšemu notranjemu sistemu človekovih pravic v Evropski uniji; meni, da bo okrepil kredibilnost Evropske unije v očeh njenih državljanov na področju varstva človekovih pravic, saj bo zagotovil polno in učinkovito spoštovanje temeljnih pravic vedno, ko gre za pravo EU;
Stresses that the accession will, first and foremost, contribute to a more coherent human rights system within the EU; takes the view that the accession will strengthen the EU’s credibility in the eyes of its own citizens in the field of human rights protection, ensuring full and effective respect for fundamental rights whenever EU law is in play;
25. poleg tega pozdravlja, da člen 1 EKČP zagotavlja varstvo ne le državljanom EU in drugim posameznikom na ozemlju Unije, ampak tudi vsem posameznikom, ki spadajo v njeno pristojnost tudi zunaj njenega ozemlja;
Welcomes, further, the fact that Article 1 of the ECHR would not only guarantee protection to EU citizens and other individuals within Union territory, but also outside Union territory to any individuals who come under its jurisdiction;
33. predlaga, naj Svet Evrope in EU preučita razvoj smernic z jasnimi obrazložitvami vseh posledic in vplivov, ki jih bo prinesel pristop, da se državljane ozavesti o dodani vrednosti, ki jo prinaša; vztraja, da morajo Komisija in države članice zagotoviti informacije državljanom EU, da bodo ti lahko v celoti razumeli, kaj so novi mehanizmi in kako jih ustrezno uporabiti;
Suggests that, in order to raise awareness of the added value of the accession to citizens, the Council of Europe and the EU should develop guidelines with clear explanations of all the implications and effects of accession; maintains that the Commission and Member States should provide EU citizens with information ensuring that they are fully aware of what the additional mechanism means and how to use it adequately;
37. vztraja pri tem, da mora biti Evropski parlament glede na pomembno vlogo, ki mu jo Lizbonska pogodba dodeljuje pri sklenitvi pristopnega sporazuma, ustrezno obveščen o opredelitvi pogajalskega mandata v zvezi s pristopom k EKČP ter tesno sodelovati pri predhodnih razpravah in poteku pogajanj o samem besedilu sporazuma v skladu z določbami člena 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Insists, in view of the important role that the Lisbon Treaty confers on the European Parliament as regards conclusion of the accession agreement, that it be duly informed of the definition of the negotiating mandate for accession to the ECHR and that it be closely involved in the preliminary discussions and also in the conduct of negotiations on that text, in accordance with the provisions of Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
o institucionalnih vidikih pristopa Evropske unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin
on institutional aspects of accession by the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – pravilo 50 poslovnika
(*) Procedure with associated committees – Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, ki je pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje predloge:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. poudarja, da bo pristop najprej in predvsem prispeval k skladnejšemu sistemu človekovih pravic znotraj EU; meni, da bo pristop okrepil kredibilnost EU v očeh njenih državljanov na področju varstva človekovih pravic, saj bo zagotovil polno in dejansko spoštovanje temeljnih pravic, ko gre za pravo EU;
Stresses that the accession will, first and foremost, contribute to a more coherent human rights system within the EU; takes the view that the accession will strengthen the EU’s credibility in the eyes of its own citizens in the field of human rights protection, ensuring full and effective respect for fundamental rights whenever EU law is in play;
6. poudarja, da bo po pristopu EKČP predstavljala minimalni standard varstva človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v Evropi in da bo obvezno veljala zlasti v primerih, v katerih bo varstvo, ki ga zagotavlja EU, slabše od varstva, ki ga zagotavlja EKČP; poudarja, da EKČP krepi varstvo pravic, ki jih priznava Listina in so v njeni pristojnosti, ter da Listina prav tako priznava druge pravice in načela, ki jih ne vsebuje EKČP, temveč dodatni protokoli in instrumenti, povezani z EKČP;
Stresses that, following the accession, the ECHR will constitute the minimum standard of protection for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe and will be crucial, in particular, in cases where the protection granted by the EU is inferior to that provided under the ECHR; points out that the ECHR reinforces protection of the rights recognised by the Charter that come within its scope and that the Charter also recognises other rights and principles, which are not contained in the ECHR, but in the additional protocols and in instruments related to the ECHR;
9. opozarja, da je še vedno veliko pravnih, tehničnih in institucionalnih vprašanj, ki še niso rešena in jih bo treba obravnavati v mandatu, ki bo sprejet na podlagi člena 218 PDEU, ter v pogajanjih s Svetom Evrope glede pristopa k EKČP; poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj zagotovita, da:
Points out that a number of legal, technical and institutional issues are still outstanding and will need to be addressed in the mandate to be adopted under Article 218 TFEU, as well as in the negotiations with the Council of Europe on accession to the ECHR; calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that:
– je obseg pristopa v mandatu natančno določen; hkrati mora EU pristopiti vsaj k vsem tistim dodatnim protokolom k EKČP, s katerimi se dopolnjujejo pravice, vsebovane v EKČP, in ki so jih že ratificirale vse države članice EU ter so tako del celote človekovih pravic EU; v zvezi s tem poziva države članice, naj ratificirajo te dodatne protokole k EKČP, ki se nanašajo na pravice, vključene v Listino o temeljnih pravicah, in ustrezno veljajo v EU; poleg tega je treba upoštevati pristop k spremenjeni Evropski socialni listini in drugim zadevnim pogodbam o človekovih pravicah Sveta Evrope;
– the scope of the accession is precisely defined in the mandate; the EU shall accede, at least, to all those Additional Protocols to the ECHR which complement the rights enshrined in the ECHR and which have already been ratified by all the EU Member States, thus forming part of the EU’s human rights corpus; in this regard, also invites Member States to ratify all those additional protocols to the ECHR which refer to the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and are accordingly applicable to the EU; furthermore, accession to the revised European Social Charter and other relevant Council of Europe human rights treaties should be taken into consideration;
– je EU ustrezno zastopana v organih Sveta Evrope in v njih sodeluje; ter da bo EU, ki sicer ne bo postala članica Sveta Evrope, s pristopom k EKČP zastopana v vseh tistih organih, pri katerih pristop vpliva na zadeve EU (kot so ponižujoče ravnanje ali kaznovanje, Evropska komisija proti rasizmu in nestrpnosti, Evropska komisija za učinkovitost sodstva in Usmerjevalni odbor za človekove pravice), ter v Odboru ministrov, vsaj pri nadzoru izvrševanja sodb o zadevah, povezanih s temeljnimi pravicami EU, pri čemer Evropski parlament sodeluje in je zastopan v postopku za izvolitev sodnika v Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice – na ravni EU, ko so imenovane kandidatke EU za položaj, in v parlamentarni skupščini, ko je izvoljen sodnik.
– the EU is properly represented, and participates, in the Council of Europe’s bodies; that, although with the accession to the ECHR the EU will not become a member of the Council of Europe, it is represented on all those human rights bodies where, as a result of the accession, EU matters are affected (such as the CPT, ECRI, CEPEJ and CDDH), and in the Committee of Ministers, at least when supervising the execution of judgments on EU fundamental rights-related matters, while the European Parliament participates and is represented in the procedure to elect a judge to the ECtHR – at EU level when the EU candidates for the post are appointed and in the PACE when the judge is elected;
– se izboljšajo odnosi med Sodiščem Evropske skupnosti in Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice in se sodiščema omogoči potrebna prožnost pri iskanju najboljšega načina sodelovanja, da se okrepi redni dialog, poleg tega pa prispeva k razvoju omenjenega sistema sodne prakse;
– the relations between the ECJ and the ECtHR are clarified, leaving the two courts the necessary flexibility to determine how best to cooperate in order to achieve an enhanced regular dialogue and, in addition, potentially contributing to the development of the abovementioned case-law system;
11. poudarja, da pristop k EKČP ne zadeva le institucij EU, temveč tudi državljane Unije, zato je treba pridobiti mnenje Evropskega parlamenta, ga vključiti v postopek pogajanj in ga na vseh stopnjah pogajanj vključevati in takoj in v celoti obveščati, kot je določeno v členu 218(10) PEU;
Stresses that, as accession to the ECHR affects not only the EU institutions, but also the Union’s citizens, the European Parliament must be consulted and involved throughout the negotiation process, and must be associated and immediately and fully informed at all stages of the negotiations, as provided for in Article 218(10) TEU;
o institucionalnih vidikih pristopa Evropske unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin
on institutional aspects of the accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Pripravljavec mnenja: Cristian Dan Preda
Rapporteur: Cristian Dan Preda
2. opozarja, da je spodbujanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic, ki je kot osrednja vrednota EU vključeno v ustanovno pogodbo, skupni temelj njenih odnosov s tretjimi državami; zato meni, da se bo s pristopom dodatno okrepilo zaupanje državljanov v Evropsko unijo in povečala verodostojnost EU v pogovorih o človekovih pravicah z državami nečlanicami; prav tako poudarja, da je za zagotovitev verodostojnosti v teh pogovorih v enaki meri pomembno tudi enotno in popolno izvajanje Listine o temeljnih pravicah na ravni EU;
Recalls that promotion of respect of human rights, a core value of the EU as enshrined in its founding treaty, constitutes common ground for its relations with third countries; takes the view, therefore, that accession will further enhance the confidence of citizens in the European Union and the EU’s credibility in talks on human rights with non-Member States; stresses, furthermore, that the uniform and full application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights at EU level is equally essential to ensure the Union's credibility in this dialogue;
6. opozarja, da je treba v skladu s prilogo št. 8 k Lizbonski pogodbi oblikovati jasen mehanizem za zagotavljanje, da se tožbe držav nečlanic in tožbe posameznikov zoper države članice in/ali Unijo pravilno obravnavajo;
Recalls that, in accordance with Protocol No 8 annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon, a clear mechanism must be established to ensure that proceedings by non-Member States and individual applications are correctly addressed to Member States and/or the European Union;
8. meni, da morajo posamezniki in države nečlanice zaradi pravne varnosti in preglednosti v mednarodnih odnosih biti ustrezno obveščeni o tem, katera področja sodijo pod okrilje pristojnosti držav članic in katera pod okrilje Evropske unije, če je treba tudi s pomočjo izjave o pristojnosti, priložene pristopni pogodbi; v zvezi s tem vztraja, da je treba pripraviti informacijski mehanizem, ki bo upošteval spreminjajočo se naravo porazdelitve pristojnosti med Unijo in državami članicami;
Is of the opinion that, in the interests of legal certainty and transparency in international relations, individuals and non-Member States must be correctly informed as to which matters fall within the sphere of competence of the Member States and which within that of the European Union, if need be by means of a declaration of competence appended to the accession treaty; stresses, in this context, the need to establish an information mechanism that takes account of future developments in the distribution of powers between the European Union and its Member States;
10. ostro nasprotuje vsakršnim mehanizmom za izogibanje razlikam med sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije, ki bi za tožeče stranke pomenili podaljšanje sodnih postopkov;
Voices its firm opposition to any mechanism for preventing divergences in case-law between the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union that would result in longer procedural delays for those seeking justice;
12. vztraja pri tem, da se pravica do demokratičnega nadzora, ki jo ima Parlament, ustrezno upošteva v postopku imenovanja predstavnika Evropske unije v Odbor ministrov in v Usmerjevalni odbor za človekove pravice, ter splošneje, ob vsakršnem imenovanju v organ Sveta Evrope, katerega članica je Evropska unija v skladu s pristopno pogodbo;
Insists on Parliament’s right to exercise democratic scrutiny being duly respected during the procedure to appoint the European Union’s representative to the Committee of Ministers and the Steering Committee for Human Rights and, in general, in connection with any appointment to a Council of Europe body of which it is agreed under the accession treaty that the European Union is to be a member;
Gabriele Albertini, Bastiaan Belder, Elmar Brok, Michael Gahler, Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadzigeorgiu (Takis Hadjigeorgiou), Heidi Hautala, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Ioanis Kasulidis (Ioannis Kasoulides), Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Kopa (Maria Eleni Koppa), Eduard Kukan, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Mario Mauro, Kiriakos Mavronikolas (Kyriakos Mavronikolas), Willy Meyer, Francisco José Millán Mon, Alexander Mirsky, Andreas Mölzer, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Raimon Obiols, Kristiina Ojuland, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Vincent Peillon, Alojz Peterle, Mirosław Piotrowski, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Werner Schulz, Adrian Severin, Marek Siwiec, Charles Tannock, Zoran Thaler, Inese Vaidere, Johannes Cornelis van Baalen, Geoffrey Van Orden, Kristian Vigenin
Gabriele Albertini, Bastiaan Belder, Elmar Brok, Michael Gahler, Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Heidi Hautala, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Ioannis Kasoulides, Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Koppa, Eduard Kukan, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Mario Mauro, Kyriakos Mavronikolas, Willy Meyer, Francisco José Millán Mon, Alexander Mirsky, Andreas Mölzer, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Raimon Obiols, Kristiina Ojuland, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Vincent Peillon, Alojz Peterle, Mirosław Piotrowski, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Werner Schulz, Adrian Severin, Marek Siwiec, Charles Tannock, Zoran Thaler, Inese Vaidere, Johannes Cornelis van Baalen, Geoffrey Van Orden, Kristian Vigenin
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Haralampos Angurakis (Charalampos Angourakis), Elena Băsescu, Diogo Feio, Georgios Kumucakos (Georgios Koumoutsakos), Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Doris Pack, Vittorio Prodi, Indrek Tarand, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Renate Weber, Janusz Władysław Zemke
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Charalampos Angourakis, Elena Băsescu, Diogo Feio, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Doris Pack, Vittorio Prodi, Indrek Tarand, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Renate Weber, Janusz Władysław Zemke
o stališču Sveta iz prve obravnave z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja) (prenovitev)
on the Council position at first reading for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (recast)
(Redni zakonodajni postopek: druga obravnava – prenovitev)
(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading - recast)
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta iz prve obravnave (11962/2009 – C7‑0034/2010 ),
– having regard to the Council position at first reading (11962/2009 – C7‑0034/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 175(1) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0002/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0002/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 294(7) in 192(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(7) and Article 192(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
UL C 87 E, 1.4.2010, str.
OJ C 87 E, 1.4.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 66 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 66 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane (A7‑0000/2010),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7‑0145/2010 ),
Stališče Sveta
Council position
(2) Da bi se preprečilo, zmanjšalo in v čim večji meri odpravilo onesnaževanje, ki je posledica industrijskih dejavnosti, v skladu z načelom "plača povzročitelj obremenitve" in načelom preprečevanja obremenjevanja okolja, je treba vzpostaviti splošen okvir za nadzor glavnih industrijskih dejavnosti, pri čemer je treba dati prednost ukrepanju pri viru in zagotoviti preudarno upravljanje naravnih virov.
(2) In order to prevent, reduce and as far as possible eliminate pollution arising from industrial activities in compliance with the "polluter pays" principle and the principle of pollution prevention, it is necessary to establish a general framework for the control of the main industrial activities, giving priority to intervention at source and ensuring prudent management of natural resources.
(2) Da bi se preprečilo, zmanjšalo in v čim večji meri odpravilo onesnaževanje, ki je posledica industrijskih dejavnosti, v skladu z načelom "plača povzročitelj obremenitve" in načelom preprečevanja obremenjevanja okolja, je treba vzpostaviti splošen okvir za nadzor glavnih industrijskih dejavnosti, pri čemer je treba dati prednost ukrepanju pri viru, zagotoviti preudarno upravljanje naravnih virov ter po potrebi upoštevati družbeno-gospodarski položaj in posebne lokalne značilnosti kraja, v katerem se dejavnost izvaja .
(2) In order to prevent, reduce and as far as possible eliminate pollution arising from industrial activities in compliance with the "polluter pays" principle and the principle of pollution prevention, it is necessary to establish a general framework for the control of the main industrial activities, giving priority to intervention at source , ensuring prudent management of natural resources and taking into account, when necessary, the socio-economic situation and specific local characteristics of the place in which the activity is taking place .
Namen predloga spremembe je dodatno podpreti uvajanje upravičenih izjem, kar je že zajeto v stališču Sveta.
The aim of this amendment is to consolidate the support for the establishment of justified exceptions already included in the Council’s position.
(3) Različni načini ločenega nadzorovanja emisij v zrak, vodo ali tla lahko spodbudijo prenos onesnaževanja z ene prvine okolja na drugo, namesto da bi varovali okolje kot celoto.
(3) Different approaches to controlling emissions into air, water or soil separately may encourage the shifting of pollution from one environmental medium to another rather than protecting the environment as a whole.
Zato je primerno zagotoviti celosten pristop k preprečevanju in nadzoru emisij v zrak, vodo in tla, ravnanju z odpadki, energetski učinkovitosti in preprečevanju nesreč.
It is therefore appropriate to provide for an integrated approach to prevention and control of emissions into air, water and soil, to waste management, to energy efficiency and to accident prevention.
Zato je primerno zagotoviti celosten pristop k preprečevanju in nadzoru emisij v zrak, vodo in tla, ravnanju z odpadki, energetski učinkovitosti in preprečevanju nesreč ter z uskladitvijo zahtev glede okoljske bilance industrijskih obratov izenačiti konkurenčne pogoje v Evropski uniji .
It is therefore appropriate to provide for an integrated approach to prevention and control of emissions into air, water and soil, to waste management, to energy efficiency and to accident prevention , a nd to create a level playing field in the European Union by aligning environmental performance requirements for industrial plants .
Šele ko bodo vsi industrijski obrati po vsej Evropi dosegali okoljske standarde na osnovi najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij, bo mogoče doseči višjo raven varstva okolja, ne da bi v EU prišlo do izkrivljanja konkurence.
It is only once all industrial plants throughout the EU meet the BAT-based environmental standards that a higher level of environmental protection can be achieved without creating distortions of competition within the EU.
(9) Da bi se izognili dvojni ureditvi, dovoljenje za obrat, ki ga zajema Direktiva 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. oktobra 2003 o vzpostavitvi sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti, ne bi smelo vključevati mejne vrednosti emisij za neposredne emisije toplogrednih plinov, določenih v Prilogi I k navedeni direktivi, razen če to ni potrebno za zagotovitev, da se ne povzroči znatno lokalno onesnaženje, ali če je obrat izključen iz navedene sheme.
(9) In order to avoid duplication of regulation, the permit for an installation covered by Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community should not include an emission limit value for direct emissions of the greenhouse gases specified in Annex I to that Directive except where it is necessary to ensure that no significant local pollution is caused or where an installation is excluded from that scheme.