natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ukrepi , sprejeti na osnovi točk (a) do (c) prvega pododstavka za spremembo nebistvenih določb te direktive se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 22(3).
Measures adopted pursuant to points (a) to (c) of the first subparagraph, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 22(3).
Komisiji lahko pri izvajanju določb tega odstavka pomaga Odbor za politiko radijskega spektra .
In the implementation of the provisions of this paragraph, the Commission may be assisted by the Radio Spectrum Policy Committee .
Prenos pristojnosti za izvajanje s Komisije na Odbor za politiko radijskega spektra mora biti opravljen v okvirni direktivi hkrati z vključitvijo klavzule, ki je enaka členu 1(4) Odločbe o radijskem spektru.
Bringing the Commission's implementing powers of the Radio Spectrum Decision within the Framework Directive must go along with the inclusion in the Directive of a clause equivalent to Article 1(4) of the Radio Spectrum Decision.
Ker so države članice pristojne za kulturno in medijsko politiko, Komisija ne bi smela obravnavati oddajne pasove kot pasove, v katerih se pravica uporabe lahko prenese ali odstopi.
In view of Member States' competence for cultural and media policy, the Commission should not identify broadcasting bands as bands for which usage rights might be transferred or leased.
Prenos ali zakup posameznih pravic sodita pod nacionalne postopke, zato bi jih Komisija morala poenotiti.
Under Article 9b, the transfer or lease of individual rights is subject to national procedures, and the Commission should thus not harmonize these procedures.
Člen 1 – točka 11 – točka (b)
Article 1 – point 11 – point (b)
Člen 10 − odstavek 4 – pododstavek 1
Article 10 − paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Komisija lahko v zvezi s tem sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe, ki lahko vključujejo vzpostavitev tarifnih načel za posebne številke ali številska območja.
The Commission may take appropriate technical implementing measures on this matter, which may include establishing tariff principles for specific numbers or number ranges.
Komisija lahko v zvezi s tem sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe, ki lahko vključujejo vzpostavitev tarifnih načel za posebne številke ali številska območja , ter določitev enotne evropske klicne številke, ki bo uporabniku zagotavljala prijazen dostop do teh storitev.
The Commission may take appropriate technical implementing measures on this matter, which may include establishing tariff principles for specific numbers or number ranges , as well as establishing a single European front-up call number ensuring user-friendly access to these services .
Člen 1 ‑ točka 13
Article 1 ‑ point 13
Člen 12 ‑ odstavek 3
Article 12 ‑ paragraph 3
Ukrepi, ki jih sprejme nacionalni regulativni organ v skladu z odstavkom 1, so objektivni, pregledni in sorazmerni ter temeljijo na nediskriminacijskih merilih .
Measures taken by a national regulatory authority in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be objective, transparent, proportionate and based on non-discriminatory criteria .
Člen 12 − odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 12 − paragraph 3 a (new)
Da bi zagotovili, da so ukrepi iz odstavka 1 sorazmerni, bodo nacionalni regulativni organi preučili razpoložljivost vseh vodov, vključno z vodi telekomunikacijskih upravljavcev, dobaviteljev energije, lokalnih skupnosti in kanalizacij, po katerih je možno napeljati telekomunikacijske vode na področja, za katere je bilo zaprošen dostop.
To ensure that measures adopted under paragraph 1 are proportionate, national regulatory authorities will investigate the availability of all ducts, including those of telecommunications operators, energy providers, local communities and sewage pipes, capable of carrying telecommunications lines in the area where access is requested.
Da bi spodbudili odobritev razvoja infrastrukture dostop do vodov ne bi smel biti umetno omejen zgolj na vode upravljavcev telekomunikacijskih omrežij, ampak bi morali biti na voljo vsi vodi.
In order to foster infrastructure roll-out access to ducts should not be artificially confined to ducts of telecommunications operators but should encompass all ducts available.
Več kot je vodov, boljše so možnosti za trajnostno konkurenco zaradi vključitve tretje strani.
The more ducts are available the better the chances for sustainable competition due to third party network roll-out.
Člen 1 − točka 14
Article 1 − point 14
Člen 13a − odstavek 3 – pododstavek 1
Article 13a − paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Države članice po potrebi zagotovijo, da podjetja, ki zagotavljajo javna komunikacijska omrežja ali javno dostopne elektronske komunikacijske storitve, nacionalni regulativni organ obvestijo o hudih kršitvah varnosti ali celovitosti, ki so imele velik vpliv na delovanje omrežij ali storitev.
Member States shall ensure , where appropriate, that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services notify the national regulatory authority of a serious breach of security or integrity that had a significant impact on the operation of networks or services.
Člen 13a − odstavek 3 – pododstavek 2
Article 13a − paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Kjer je to primerno, zadevni nacionalni regulativni organ obvesti nacionalne regulativne organe v drugih državah članicah in organ.
Where appropriate, the national regulatory authority concerned shall inform the national regulatory authorities in other Member States and the Authority.
Člen 13a − odstavek 3 – pododstavek 3
Article 13a − paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Nacionalni regulativni organ Komisiji vsako leto predloži zbirno poročilo o prejetih obvestilih in ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s tem odstavkom.
Every year , the national regulatory authority shall submit a summary report to the Commission on the notifications received and the action taken in accordance with this paragraph.
Člen 13 − odstavek 4 – pododstavek 1
Article 13 − paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Komisija, ki dosledno upošteva mnenje organa, izdano v skladu s členom 4(3)(b) Uredbe […/ES] , lahko sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe za uskladitev ukrepov iz odstavkov 1, 2 in 3, vključno z ukrepi, ki opredeljujejo okoliščine, obliko in postopke, ki se uporabljajo za obveznosti prijave.
The Commission, taking the utmost account of the opinion of the Authority issued in accordance with Article 4(3)(b) of Regulation [.../EC], may adopt appropriate technical implementing measures with a view to harmonising the measures referred to in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements.
Komisija, ki dosledno upošteva mnenje organa, izdano v skladu s členom 4(3)(b) Uredbe […/ES] , lahko spodbuja širjenje in izmenjavo najboljših praks med podjetji in pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi ter sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe za uskladitev ukrepov iz odstavkov 1, 2 in 3, vključno z ukrepi, ki opredeljujejo okoliščine, obliko in postopke, ki se uporabljajo za obveznosti prijave.
The Commission, taking the utmost account of the opinion of the Authority issued in accordance with Article 4(3)(b) of Regulation [.../EC], may encourage the dissemination and exchange of best practices among undertakings and competent national authorities and adopt appropriate technical implementing measures with a view to harmonising the measures referred to in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements.
Komisijo ima lahko pozitivno vlogo pri usklajevanju in spodbujanju izmenjave najboljših praks, ne da bi hkrati vsiljevala zavezujoče ukrepe.
The Commission can play a positive role in coordinating and favouring the sharing of best practices, without necessarily imposing binding measures.
Člen 13a − odstavek 4 − pododstavek 2
Article 13a − paragraph 4 − subparagraph 2
Ti izvedbeni ukrepi, ki so namenjeni spremembam nebistvenih elementov te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo, se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 22(3) , kadar samoregulativne pobude industrije ne dosežejo ustrezne ravni varnosti na notranjem trgu v eni ali več državah članicah .
These implementing measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(3) where industry-led self-regulatory initiatives have not achieved an adequate level of security in the internal market in one or more Member States .
Člen 1 ‑ točka 17
Article 1 ‑ point 17
Člen 16 ‑ odstavek 5 ‑ pododstavek 2
Article 16 ‑ paragraph 5 ‑ subparagraph 2
Komisija lahko, ob doslednem upoštevanju mnenja organa, izda odločbo, v kateri enega ali več podjetij opredeli kot podjetje(-a) s pomembno tržno močjo na tem trgu, in naloži eno ali več posebnih obveznosti po členih 9 do 13a Direktive 2002(19/ES (Direktive o dostopu) in členu 17 Direktive 2002/22/ES (Direktive o univerzalnih storitvah).
The Commission, taking the utmost account of the opinion of the Authority, may issue a decision designating one or more undertakings as having significant market power on that market, and imposing one or more specific obligations under Articles 9 to 13a of Directive 2002/19/EC (Access Directive) and Article 17 of Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive).
Pri tem Komisija zasleduje cilje politike, določene v členu 8.
In so doing, the Commission shall pursue the policy objectives set out in Article 8.
Da bi povečali doslednost, vendar pri tem ne bi spremenili občutljivega institucionalnega razmerja moči ali spodkopali subsidiarnih elementov uredbe, bi morala Komisija igrati vlogo razsodnika, ne sodnika.
To improve consistency without altering the delicate institutional balance of powers or undermining the subsidiarity elements of the Regulation, the Commission should play the role of an arbitrator rather than of a judge.
Člen 19 – odstavek 4 – točka a
Article 19 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) doslednega izvajanja regulativnih pristopov, vključno s sistemsko obravnavo vseevropskih storitev, kot so svetovne telekomunikacijske storitve in novih storitev;
(a) Consistent implementation of regulatory approaches, including regulatory treatment of pan-European services, such as global telecommunications services, and new services;
Vseevropske telekomunikacijske storitve s svojim glavnim primerom globalnih telekomunikacijskih storitev, ki jih ponujajo multinacionalnim podjetjem, ki imajo predstavništva v številnih evropskih državah, so eno izmed področij, v katerem bi Komisija morala biti pristojna za zagotavljanje enotnega regulativnega pristopa po vsej EU.
Pan-European telecommunications services with its current lead example of global telecommunications services(GTS) offered to multinational companies with offices in a number of European countries are one of the areas where the Commission should have the power to ensure a harmonised regulatory approach within the EU.
Člen 19 − odstavek 4 – točka c
Article 19 − paragraph 4 – point c
(c) potrošniških vprašanj, ki niso vključena v Direktivo 2002/22/ES, zlasti v zvezi z dostopnostjo za končne uporabnike invalide do elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev in opreme;
(c) Consumer issues not included in Directive 2002/22/EC , in particular accessibility to electronic communications services and equipment by disabled end-users;
Ta člen naj bi služil kot podlaga za urejanje samo tistih potrošniških vprašanj, ki niso zajeta v Direktivi o univerzalnih storitvah.
Only consumer issues not covered by the Universal Service Directive should be regulated on the basis of this Article.
Člen 2 – točka 8 – točka b a (novo)
Article 2 – point 8 – point b a (new)
Člen 12 − odstavek 2 – točka a
Article 12 − paragraph 2 – point a
(a) tehnično in gospodarsko upravičenost uporabe ali namestitve konkurenčnih naprav z vidika stopnje tržnega razvoja in koristi za potrošnike , pri čemer se upoštevata narava in vrsta vključenega medomrežnega povezovanja in dostopa, vključno z izvedljivostjo drugih možnosti za dostop do nabavnega trga ;
(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development and of the benefits for consumers , taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and access involved , including the viability of other upstream access options ;
Konkurenco na področju infrastrukture, ki je osnovni cilj te uredbe, je treba oceniti tudi v skladu s koristmi za potrošnika.
Infrastructure competition, while a primary goal of this regulation, needs to be assessed according to the benefit to the consumer too.
Konkurenco je treba spodbujati kar se da daleč v vrednostni verigi.
Competition should be promoted as deep as possible in the value chain.
Člen 13a – odstavek 2 – točka a
Article 13a – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) dokaz, da uvedba ustreznih obveznosti med tistimi, opredeljenimi v členih 9 do 13 za doseganje učinkovite konkurence po usklajeni analizi upoštevnih trgov v skladu s postopkom analize trga iz člena 16 Direktive 2002/21/ES (Okvirna direktiva), ni bila uspešna in ne bi bila uspešna pri doseganju učinkovite konkurence in da obstajajo pomembni in trajni problemi glede konkurence/nepopolnega trga, ki so ugotovljeni na mnogih proizvodnih trgih.
(a) evidence that the imposition of appropriate obligations amongst those identified in Articles 9-13 to achieve effective competition following a co-ordinated analysis of the relevant markets in accordance with the market analysis procedure set out in Article 16 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) has failed and would fail on a persistent basis to achieve effective competition and that there are important and persisting competition problems/market failures identified in several of these product markets.
(a) dokaz, da uvedba ustreznih obveznosti med tistimi, opredeljenimi v členih 9 do 13 za doseganje učinkovite konkurence po usklajeni analizi upoštevanih trgov v skladu s postopkom analize trga iz člena 16 Direktive 2002/21/ES (Okvirna direktiva), ni bila uspešna in ne bi bila uspešna pri doseganju učinkovite konkurence in da obstajajo pomembni in trajni problemi glede konkurence/nepopolnega trga, ki so ugotovljeni na mnogih proizvodnih trgihin da bi bil ta ukrep najučinkovitejši , in najuspešnejši način za izvrševanje pravnih sredstev, namenjenih obravnavi takšnih neuspehov ;
(a) evidence that the imposition of appropriate obligations amongst those identified in Articles 9-13 to achieve effective competition following a co-ordinated analysis of the relevant markets in accordance with the market analysis procedure set out in Article 16 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) has failed and would fail on a persistent basis to achieve effective competition and that there are important and persisting competition problems/market failures identified in several of these product markets and that this measure would be the most effective and efficient means to enforce remedies aimed at addressing such failures .
Ker lahko funkcionalna ločitev organu in reguliranemu operaterju poenostavi izvrševanje, bi bilo treba regulatorjem omogočiti, da ta ukrep uporabijo na dolgoročni osnovi, ne pa šele po dolgoletnih neuspešnih poskusih izvršitve, ki kažejo na to, da so bili ukrepi dlje časa neučinkoviti (in se tako ni razvila konkurenca).
Since functional separation can provide a means to simplify enforcement for the Authority and regulated operator, it should be possible for Regulators to make use of this measure on a forward-looking basis and not only after there is a long-standing failure of enforcement which means that remedies have been ineffective over an extended period (and thus competition has failed to develop).
Treba se je sklicevati na učinkovito konkurenco, saj bi se lahko zgodilo, da bi v določeni meri obstajala infrastrukturna konkurenca, ki pa ne bi dovolj učinkovito omejevala prevladujočega operaterja.
It is important to refer to 'effective' competition as some infrastructure competition could exist without being sufficient to provide an effective constraint on the dominant operator.
Člen 3 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1 a in b (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraphs 1 a and b (new)
Za nove svetovne telekomunikacijske storitve se uporablja samo poenostavljen postopek z uradnim obvestilom in posebno registracijo elektronskih komunikacijskih dejavnosti kot “globalnih telekomunikacijskih storitev“.
Global telecommunications services shall be subject to no more than a simplified notification process with specified registration of electronic communications service activity as “global telecommunications services”.
„Globalne telekomunikacijske storitve“ so upravljane poslovne podatkovne in govorne storitve za multinacionalne družbe z lokacijo v različnih državah in pogosto na različnih celinah.
Global telecommunications services are managed business data and voice services for multinational companies located in different countries and often different continents.
Za te storitve je značilno, da so čezmejne, v Evropi pa vseevropske.
They are inherently cross-border and, within Europe , pan-European.
Člen 5 – odstavek 1 – uvodno besedilo
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
Države članice pospešujejo uporabo radijskih frekvenc v skladu s splošno odobritvijo .
Member States shall facilitate the use of radio frequencies within the framework of the general authorisation .
Države članice lahko podelijo individualne pravice, da bi :
Member States may grant individual rights in order to:
Splošne odobritve bi lahko bile z razvojem tehnologije dolgoročno uspešna rešitev.
General authorisations may be a viable solution in the long term once the technology has developed.
Vendar pa mora podeljevanje individualnih pravic ostati običajen postopek pri dodeljevanju spektra.
However, the granting of individual rights should remain the normal procedure for spectrum allocation.
Člen 5 – odstavek 1 – točka b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) izpolnjevanja drugih ciljev splošnega interesa.
(b) fulfil other objectives of general interest.
(b) izpolnjevanja drugih ciljev splošnega interesa , vključno z zagotavljanjem storitev oddajanja .
(b) fulfil other objectives of general interest , including the provision of broadcasting services .
Člen 5 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 5
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Vsaka individualna pravica uporabe radijskih frekvenc, ki se podeli za deset let ali več in ki je podjetja v skladu s členom 9b Okvirne direktive ne morejo prenesti ali dati v zakup, je vsakih pet let in prvič pet let po njeni izdaji predmet pregleda, ob upoštevanju meril iz odstavka 1 .
Any individual right to use radio frequencies that is granted for ten years or more and that may not be transferred or leased between undertakings as allowed by Article 9b of the Framework Directive shall , every five years and for the first time five years after its issuance, be subject to a review in the light of the criteria in paragraph 1.
Če merila za podelitev individualnih pravic uporabe ne veljajo več, se individualna pravica spremeni v splošno odobritev za uporabo radijskih frekvenc, ob predhodnem obvestilu največ pet let po zaključku pregleda, ali pa pravica postane prosto prenosljiva ali na voljo za zakup med podjetji.
If the criteria to grant individual rights of use are no longer applicable, the individual right of use shall be changed into a general authorisation for the use of radio frequencies, subject to prior notice of not more than five years from the conclusion of the review , or shall be made freely transferable or leaseable between undertakings.
Ko se individualna pravica uporabe radijskih frekvenc podeli za deset let ali več in je podjetja v skladu s členom 9b okvirne direktive ne morejo prenesti ali dati v zakup , nacionalni regulativni organ zagotovi sredstva za preverjanje, da merila za podelitev teh individualnih pravic uporabe se še vedno uporabljajo in spoštujejo v času veljavnosti licence.
Where individual rights to use radio frequencies are granted for ten years or more and may not be transferred or leased between undertakings under Article 9b of the Framework Directive, the national regulatory authority shall ensure that it has the means to verify that the criteria to grant those individual rights of use continue to apply and to be complied with for the duration of the licence.
Če merila za podelitev individualnih pravic uporabe ne veljajo več, se individualna pravica spremeni v splošno odobritev za uporabo radijskih frekvenc, ob predhodnem obvestilu in po razumnem času, ali pa pravica postane prosto prenosljiva ali na voljo za zakup med podjetji.
If those criteria are no longer applicable, the individual right of use shall be changed into a general authorisation for the use of radio frequencies, subject to prior notice and after a reasonable period , or shall be made freely transferable or leaseable between undertakings.
Pri sprejemanju take odločitve se ustrezno upošteva potrebo po omogočanju ustrezne dobe amortizacije za vlaganja.
When such a decision is taken, due account shall be taken of the need to accord a suitable period for amortization of investments.
Za številne nove platforme in storitve, za katere bodo vlaganja povrnjena v obdobju, ki presega deset ali vsaj pet let.
There are numerous new platforms and services on which investment must be recouped over a period exceeding ten or at least five years.
Precejšnje izgube v prvem letu ali dveh delovanja so običajne.
It is not unusual to sustain considerable losses during the first one or two years of operation.
Bilo bi pretirano strogo zahtevati, naj nacionalni regulativni organ opravi uradni pregled vseh licenc za spekter oddajanja vsakih pet let.
It would be disproportionate to require the national regulatory authority on an inflexible basis to carry out a formal review every five years of all broadcasting spectrum licences.
Člen 6a – odstavek 1 – točka c
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point c
Podeljevanje splošnih odobritev je dolgoročen cilj in usklajevalni ukrepi naj se ne bi obravnavali na tej stopnji.
The granting of general authorisations is a long-term objective and harmonisation should not be envisaged at this stage.
Tehnični izvedbeni ukrep iz odstavka 6a(1)(f) lahko predvideva, da organ predloži predloge za izbiro podjetja(-ij), kateremu(-im) je treba podeliti individualne pravice uporabe radijskih frekvenc ali številk, v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe […].
The technical implementing measure referred to in paragraph 6a(1)(f) may provide for the Authority to make proposals for the selection of undertaking(s) to which individual rights of use for radio frequencies or numbers are to be granted, in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation [..].
Pri izdaji teh pravic je treba opraviti selekcijo s posebnimi zakonodajnimi predlogi po vsej EU in ne s postopkom komitologije.
Regarding the granting of these rights, selection should be carried out by means of specific legal proposals throughout the EU and not through the comitology procedure.
Priloga I – točka 4 a (novo)
Annex I – point 4 a (new)
Priloga – Del C – točka 1
Annex – Part C – point 1
Določitev storitve, za katero se uporabi številka, vključno z vsemi zahtevami, povezanimi z zagotavljanjem te storitve, ter – v izogib dvomom – tarifnimi načeli in najvišjimi cenami, ki lahko veljajo za posebna številska območja za zagotavljanje varstva potrošnikov v skladu s členom 8(4)(b) Direktive 2002/21/ES .
Designation of service for which the number shall be used, including any requirements linked to the provision of that service and, for the avoidance of doubt, tariff principles and maximum prices that can apply to specific number ranges for the purposes of ensuring consumer protection in accordance with Article 8(4)(b) of Directive 2002/21/EC .
Priloga II – točka 1
Annex II – point 1