natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) „postopek“ pomeni kakršno koli uporabo živali v poskusne ali druge znanstvene namene z znanimi ali neznanimi rezultati, ki živali lahko (ali pa ne) povzroči bolečino, trpljenje, stisko ali trajne poškodbe, ter zajema vsako ukrepanje , ki povzroči ali lahko povzroči rojstvo živali v takih okoliščinah ali nastanek nove genetsko spremenjene linije živali;
(1) 'procedure' means any use of an animal for experimental or other scientific purposes, with known or unknown outcome, which may or may not cause the animal pain, suffering distress or lasting harm and includes any course of action intended, or liable, to result in the birth of an animal in any such condition or in the creation of a new genetically modified animal line;
6a. „pristojni organ“ pomeni organ ali organe, ki jih določi vsaka država članica kot pristojne za nadzorovanje izvajanja direktive;
6a. 'competent authority' means the authority or authorities designated by each Member State as being responsible for supervising the enforcement of this Directive ;
Člen 3 – točka 6 b (novo)
Article 3 – point 6 b (new)
(6b) „etični pristop“ je pristop, ki se uporabi pred poskusi ter zajema oceno znanstvene in družbene utemeljenosti uporabe živali ob upoštevanju dejstva, da mora človek spoštovati živali kot živa in čuteča bitja;
(6b) 'ethical approach' means the approach which precedes experimentation and consists of assessing the scientific and societal grounds for using animals, with reference to humankind's duty to respect animals as living, sentient beings;
Te opredelitve je treba dodati, saj zadevajo pojme, ki so bistveni pri odobritvi projektov.
These definitions should be added because they relate to concepts that are at the core of project authorisations.
Člen 3 – odstavek 6 c (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 6c (new)
(6c) „pristojna oseba“ pomeni vsako osebo, ki v državi članici velja kot pristojna za opravljanje ustrezne funkcije, ki je opisana v tej direktivi;
(6 c ) ' c ompetent p erson' means any person who is considered by a Member State to be competent to perform the relevant function described in this Directive ;
Člen 3 – odstavek – 6 d (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 6d (new)
(6d) „vzreja“ pomeni vse tiste dejavnosti, ki so potrebne za rejo in ohranjanje fenotipsko normalnih živali za znanstvene ali druge namene, vendar same niso del poskusov;
(6 d ) ' h usbandry' means all those activities required to breed and maintain phenotypically normal animals , whether for scientific or other purposes , but which do not themselves constitute experiment s ;
Člen 3 – odstavek – 6 e (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 6e (new)
(6e) „praksa“ pomeni vsako neeksperimentalno ali vsako znanstveno dejavnost, ki ni del poskusa;
(6 e ) ' p ractice' means any non-experimental activity or any scientific a ctivity which does not constitute an experiment ;
Člen 3 – odstavek –6 f (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 6f (new)
(6f) „primerno anesteziran“ pomeni omrtvičen s tako učinkovitimi anestezijskimi metodami, lokalnimi ali splošnimi, kot se uporabljajo v dobri veterinarski praksi;
(6 f ) ' p roperly a naestheti s ed' means deprived of sensation by means of anaesthesia , whether local or general , which is as effective as those used in good veterinary practice ;
Člen 3 – odstavek 6g (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 6g (new)
(6g) „protokol“ pomeni vrsto postopkov, ki so del poskusa z določenim ciljem;
(6 g ) ' p rotocol' means a series of procedures that constitute an experiment with a defined objective ;
Člen 3 – odstavek 6 h (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 6h (new)
(6h) „regulativni postopek“ pomeni vsak poskusni ali drug znanstveni postopek, ki bo verjetno imel za posledico bolečino, trpljenje, stisko ali trajno poškodbo zaščitene živali;
(6 h ) ' r egulated p rocedure' means any experimental or other scientific procedure, which is likely to have the effect of causing a protected animal pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm ;
Člen 3 – odstavek – 6 i (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 6i (new)
(6i) ) „vnovična uporaba“ pomeni uporabo živali, ki je že bila uporabljena v postopku, kadar je mogoče uporabiti drugo žival, na kateri prej ni bil izveden noben postopek;
(6 i ) ) ‘ r e-use’ means the use of an animal already used in a procedure, when a different animal on which no procedure has previously been carried out could also be used ;
Člen 3 – odstavek 6 j (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 6j (new)
(6j) „zaupne informacije“ pomenijo informacije, katerih nesporazumna objava bi posegala v legitimne gospodarske ali druge interese njihovega lastnika ali tretje strani;
(6 j ) 'confidential information' means information , the non-consensual release of which c ould prejudice the legitimate commercial or other interests of its owner or a third party .
Kadar obstaja preskusna metoda, ki ne vključuje uporabe živali in jo je mogoče uporabiti namesto postopka, države članice zagotovijo, da se uporabi alternativna metoda.
Where a method of testing not involving the use of animals exists and may be used in place of a procedure, Member States shall ensure that the alternative method is used.
Kadar obstaja preskusna metoda, poskusna ali druga znanstvena dejavnost, ki ne vključuje uporabe živih živali in ki je z znanstvenega vidika zadovoljiva metoda ali poskusna strategija za pridobivanje želenih rezultatov ter ki jo je mogoče uporabiti namesto postopka, države članice zagotovijo, da se uporabi alternativna metoda , razen če je alternativna metoda v zadevni državi članici prepovedana v skladu s to direktivo.
Where a method of testing, experimentation or other scientific activity not involving the use of living animals exists which, from a scientific point of view, is a satisfactory method or testing strategy for obtaining the result sought and which may be used in place of a procedure, Member States shall ensure that the alternative method is used , provided that the alternative method is not prohibited in the Member State concerned .
Preskusne metode z uporabo človeških embrionalne in fetalne celice se ne upoštevajo kot alternativne .
Pursuant to this Directive, testing methods which involve the use of human embryonic and foetal cells shall not be regarded as alternatives.
Izraz preskus ni opredeljen in se v običajni znanstveni uporabi razlikuje od poskusnega raziskovanja.
The term testing is undefined and, in normal scientific usage, is different from experimental research.
Države članice se lahko same odločijo, ali bodo uporabile celice človeškega zarodka in plodu ter pod kakšnimi pogoji in ali bodo te preskusne metode obravnavale kot etično sprejemljive alternativne metode preskusom na živalih.
Member States are free to decide whether and subject to what conditions the use of human embryonic and foetal cells is allowed and whether such testing methods are to be regarded as ethically defensible alternatives to animal testing.
Države članice zagotovijo sredstva za usposabljanje, raziskave in razvoj znanstveno zadovoljivih metod ali preskusnih strategij brez uporabe živali ter njihovo izvajanje.
Member States shall ensure that funding is provided for training and research on, and development and implementation of , scientifically satisfactory methods or testing strategies that do not entail the use of animals
Predlogi sprememb člena 4 se vlagajo, da bi se v skladu z glavnim ciljem te direktive poudarila obveznost držav članic, da si prek dejanj pristojnih organov prizadevajo k doseganju ciljev iz člena 4.
In recognition of the primary objective of the Directive, amendments to Article 4 are proposed to make explicit the obligation on Member States to pursue, through the acts of the competent authority, the objective of Article 4.
Zagotavljanje sredstev za usposabljanje in spodbujanje alternativnih metod je obvezno, da bi čim prej dosegli cilje direktive.
An obligation to provide funding for, training on and promotion of alternative methods is imposed to ensure that the aims of the Directive are achieved as swiftly as possible.
Države članice zagotovijo, da pristojni organi pri obravnavi dovoljenj projektov sledijo cilju iz odstavka 1.
Member States shall ensure that the aim of paragraph 1 is pursued by the competent authority when considering the authorisation of projects.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se ustreznim osebam in ustanovam zagotovi usposabljanje o uporabi znanstveno zadovoljivih metod ali preskusnih strategij brez uporabe živali, ter spodbujajo te metode oz. preskusne strategije.
Member States shall ensure training is provided on the use of scientifically satisfactory methods or testing strategies that do not entail the use of animals, to appropriate persons and establishments, and promote such methods or testing strategies.
Člen 5 – odstavek 2 – točka (b a) (novo)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) izboljšanje proizvodnih pogojev in dobrega počutja živali iz vzreje za kmetijske namene.
(ba) the improvement of the production conditions and welfare of animals reared for agricultural purposes.
Opozoriti je treba na pomen kmetijskih namenov z vidika njihovih kmetijskih, prehrambenih in okoljskih razsežnosti.
It is necessary to highlight the importance of agricultural purposes in terms of their agricultural, food and environmental dimensions.
4a. varstvo zdravja ljudi, ko gre za izpostavljenost kemikalijam delavcev ali potrošnikov;
4a. the protection of human health in the context of workers' or consumers' exposure to chemicals;
Sedanji seznam postopkov ne vključuje izrecno ukrepov, nujnih za varstvo zdravja ljudi, ko gre za izpostavljenost kemikalijam delavcev in potrošnikov.
The current list of procedures does not explicitly include measures needed to protect human health in the context of workers' and consumers' exposure to chemicals.
(5) raziskave, usmerjene v ohranitev vrst;
(5) research aimed at preservation of the species;
(5) raziskave, usmerjene v ohranitev , zdravje in dobro počutje vrst;
(5) research aimed at preservation, health and welfare of the species;
Države članice zagotovijo, da živali v pooblaščenih ustanovah ubijajo pooblaščene osebe , tako da čutijo najmanj bolečine, trpljenja in stiske, in da se pri vrstah, naštetih v Prilogi V, uporabi primerna humana metoda ubijanja, kot je določeno v tej prilogi.
Member States shall ensure that animals are killed in an authorised establishment, by an authorised person and with a minimum of pain, suffering and distress and, in relation to the species included in Annex V, using the appropriate humane method of killing as set out in that Annex.
Države članice zagotovijo, da živali ubijajo pooblaščene osebe v pooblaščenih ustanovah, tako da čutijo najmanj bolečine, trpljenja in stiske, in da se pri vrstah, naštetih v Prilogi V, uporabi primerna humana metoda ubijanja, kot je določeno v tej prilogi , ali druge metode, za katere je znanstveno dokazano, da so vsaj enako humane .
Member States shall ensure that animals are killed in an authorised establishment, by an authorised person and with a minimum of pain, suffering and distress and, in relation to the species included in Annex V, using an appropriate humane method of killing as set out in that Annex or by such other methods as are scientifically demonstrated to be at least as humane.
Kjer je možna in že razpoložljiva bolj humana metoda ubijanja, se lahko uporabi, tudi če ni vključena v Prilogo V.
Where a more humane method of killing is possible and readily available, it may be used even if it is not included in Annex V .
Ko so razvite bolj humane metode ubijanja, jim predlog spremembe omogoča, da se nemudoma uporabijo, namesto da se nekaj let čaka na posodobitev Priloge V.
When more humane methods of killing are developed, this will allow them to be used immediately instead of waiting several years for Annex V to be updated
Pristojni organi lahko odobrijo izjeme od odstavka 1 na podlagi znanstvene utemeljitve, da namena postopka ni mogoče doseči s humano metodo ubijanja.
Competent authorities may grant exemptions from paragraph 1 on the basis of scientific justification that the purpose of the procedure cannot be achieved by the use of a humane method of killing.
Pristojni organi lahko odobrijo izjeme od odstavka 1 na podlagi znanstvene utemeljitve, da namena postopka ni mogoče doseči s humano metodo ubijanja, ali če dokažejo, da so bile razvite metode, ki bolj spoštujejo varstvo živali .
Competent authorities may grant exemptions from paragraph 1 on the basis of scientific justification that the purpose of the procedure cannot be achieved by the use of a humane method of killing or that other methods providing better animal protection have been developed .
Živali se brez izjeme ubijejo tako, da čutijo najmanj bolečine, trpljenja in stiske.
Notwithstanding any exemption, animals shall be killed with a minimum of pain, suffering and distress .
Nacionalni ukrepi
National measures
Ta direktiva ne sme ovirati držav članic pri izvajanju ali sprejemanju bolj strogih nacionalnih ukrepov za izboljšanje dobrega počutja in varstva živali, ki se jih uporablja za znanstvene raziskave.
This Directive shall not prevent Member States from applying or adopting stricter national measures seeking to improve the well-being and protection of animals used for scientific purposes.
Člen 7 – odstavek 1 – točka b b (novo)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) kolikor je le mogoče morajo biti uporabljene živali rejene posebej za namene preskušanja;
( bb ) as far as possible, the animals used should be bred specifically for testing purposes;
Z namenom varstva živali, ki ga ureja sporazum iz Washingtona o varstvu vrst, je treba odobriti uporabo posebej rejenih živali, kjer je mogoče.
With a view to protecting the species covered by the Washington Agreement on the Protection of Species, where possible the use of specially bred animals should be authorised.
Člen 8 – odstavek 1 – uvodni stavek
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase
Primati razen človeka se ne uporabljajo v postopkih, razen v tistih, ki izpolnjujejo naslednje pogoje:
Non-human primates shall not be used in procedures, with the exception of those procedures meeting the following conditions:
Primati razen človeka se ne uporabljajo v postopkih zaradi njihove visoke ravni nevrofiziološke občutljivosti in kognitivnega razvoja ; razen v tistih, ki izpolnjujejo naslednje pogoje:
Given their particularly high level of neurophysiological sensitivity and cognitive development, non-human primates shall not be used in procedures, with the exception of those procedures meeting the following conditions:
Katere živalske vrste je treba posebej zaščititi pri poskusih, se ne določi na podlagi sistemske uvrstitve, ampak na podlagi visoke nevrofiziološke in kognitivne stopnje razvoja živali.
The decisive criterion which should be used to determine whether species need special protection in the context of testing is not their classification, but rather the animals' high level of neurophysiological sensitivity and cognitive development.
(a) postopek ima enega od namenov iz točke (1), (2)(a) ali (3) in se izvaja za izogibanje, preprečevanje, odkrivanje ali zdravljenje smrtno nevarnih ali izčrpavajočih kliničnih stanj pri človeku ali namen iz točke (5) člena 5;
(a) the procedure has one of the purposes referred to in points (1), (2)(a), (3) and is undertaken with a view to the avoidance, prevention, diagnosis or treatment of life-threatening or debilitating clinical conditions in human beings or the purpose referred to in point (5) of Article 5;
(a) postopek ima enega od namenov iz točk (1), (2)(a) , (3) ali (5) člena 5;
(a) the procedure has one of the purposes referred to in points (1), (2)(a), (3) or (5) of Article 5;
Za poseben status, ki je dodeljen primatom razen človeka, ne obstaja znanstvena utemeljitev, zato je treba odobriti osnovne raziskave, ki ne smejo biti omejene na poskuse, katerih namen je doseganje posebnih ciljev v okviru medicinskih raziskav.
There is no scientific justification for the special status granted to NHPs, so that basic research should be allowed, without being restricted to experiments designed to achieve specific medical research objectives.
Treba je upoštevati, da evropske in mednarodne smernice za odobritev biotehnoloških snovi zahtevajo, da se izvedejo študije na primatih razen ljudi, preden se testirajo na ljudeh.
Due account must be taken of the fact that European and international approval guidelines for biotechnological active agents stipulate that studies must be carried out on NHPs before human testing can begin.
Sedanja ubeseditev bi lahko povzročila težave za vso biotehnološko industrijo v Evropi v povezavi z razvojem novih snovi in povzročila, da ta industrija premesti razvojne dejavnosti.
The current wording would create problems for the entire European biotechnology industry in connection with the development of new active agents and force that industry to relocate development activities.
(b) obstaja znanstvena utemeljitev, da namena postopka ni mogoče doseči z uporabo vrste, ki ni vrsta primatov razen človeka.
(b) there is a scientific justification that the purpose of the procedure cannot be achieved by the use of other species than non-human primates.
(b) izvajalec postopka poda znanstveno in etično utemeljitev, da namena postopka ni mogoče doseči z uporabo vrste, ki ni vrsta primatov razen človeka.
(b) the applicant provides a scientific and ethical justification that the purpose of the procedure cannot be achieved by the use of other species than non-human primates.
Komisija vsaki dve leti, prvič dve leti po začetku veljave te direktive, po posvetovanju z državami članicami opravi pregled uporabe primatov razen človeka v postopkih in objavi njene ugotovitve.
Every two years, and for the first time two years after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall, in consultation with Member States, conduct a review of the use of non-human primates in procedures and publish the results thereof.
Pri pregledu preuči vpliv napredka v znanju glede tehnologije, znanosti in dobrega počutja živali ter postavi cilje za izvajanje potrjenih nadomestnih metod.
The review shall examine the impact of developments in technological, scientific and animal-welfare knowledge, and set targets for the implementation of validated replacement methods.
Vstavi se nov odstavek, ki uvede pregled uporabe primatov razen človeka v postopkih, ki ga Komisija opravi vsaki dve leti.
A new paragraph is inserted to introduce a review of the use of non-human primates in procedures which is to be conducted by the Commission every two years.
Pregledi se opravljajo v rednih razmikih, da bi se zagotovilo, da je izvajanje direktive v koraku z razvojem tehnologije in znanosti.
Reviews are conducted at regular intervals to ensure that implementation of the Directive keeps pace with technological and scientific developments.
Člen 10 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek -1 (novo)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph -1 (new)
(-1) Komisija pet let po začetku veljavnosti te direktive pripravi oceno dobrega počutja živali in oceno izvedljivosti izvajanja zahtev iz odstavka 2.
(-1) The Commission shall carry out an animal welfare assessment and a feasibility evaluation of implementation of the requirements set out in paragraph 2 , five years after the entry into force of th is D irective.
Zato je treba izpeljati študijo izvedljivosti, saj še ni bila določena.
A feasibility study has therefore to be conducted as it was not established yet.
Boljša alternativa bi bila raziskati možnost ustanovitve samooskrbnih kolonij za zagotovitev živali zadostne kakovosti za raziskovalne potrebe EU.
A better alternative would be to look at the feasibility of establishing self-sustaining colonies to ensure they can supply animals of sufficient quality to support EU research needs.
Vendar pa bodo od datumov, določenih v Prilogi III, države članice zagotovile, da se primati razen človeka, navedeni v tej prilogi, lahko uporabljajo v postopkih, samo kadar so potomci primatov razen človeka, ki so bili vzrejeni v ujetništvu .
However , as from the dates set out in Annex III, Member States shall ensure that non-human primates listed in that Annex may only be used in procedures where they are the offspring of non-human primates which have been bred in captivity .
Kjer je izvedljivost ugotovljena, bodo od datumov, določenih v Prilogi III, v skladu z oceno iz odstavka 1 države članice zagotovile, da se primati razen človeka, navedeni v tej prilogi, lahko uporabljajo v postopkih, samo kadar izvirajo iz samooskrbnih kolonij .
Where feasibility is established , as from the dates to be set in Annex III in light of the evaluation referred to in paragraph 1 , Member States shall ensure that non-human primates listed in that Annex may only be used in procedures where they are sourced from self-sustaining colonies .
Pristojni organi lahko odobrijo izjeme od odstavka 1 na podlagi znanstvene utemeljitve.
Competent authorities may grant exemptions from paragraph 1 on the basis of a scientific justification.
Pristojni organi lahko odobrijo izjeme od odstavka 1 na podlagi veterinarske utemeljitve iz razlogov dobrega počutja živali ali na podlagi znanstvene utemeljitve
Competent authorities may grant exemptions from paragraph 1 on the basis of a veterinary justification for reasons of animal welfare or on the basis of a scientific justification.
Utemeljitev je treba razširiti na področje veterine, na katerem lahko strokovnjaki ocenijo vsa merila, povezana z dobrim počutjem živali.
It is important to include veterinary justification, as specialists in this field are capable of assessing all criteria linked to animal welfare.
Za namene izobraževanja in usposabljanja se lahko trupla, tkivo in organe živali uporablja samo, če izhajajo iz živali, ubitih v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. .../2009 [o zaščiti živali pri usmrtitvi] 1 .
For higher education and training purposes, the cadavers, tissue and organs of animals may be used only if they come from animals slaughtered in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No .../2009 [on the protection of animals at the time of killing] 1 .
1 UL L ....
1 OJ L ....
Države članice zagotovijo, da se postopki vedno izvajajo v uporabniških enotah.
Member States shall ensure that procedures are always carried out in user establishments.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se postopki vedno izvajajo v enotah , opredeljenih v členu 3 .
Member States shall ensure that procedures are always carried out in establishments as defined in A rticle 3 .
Države članice zagotovijo, da se vsi postopki izvajajo pod splošno ali lokalno anestezijo.
Member States shall ensure that all procedures are carried out under general or local anaesthesia.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se po potrebi vsi postopki izvajajo pod splošno ali lokalno anestezijo ali z drugimi metodami, ki lahko blažijo bolečino ali zmanjšajo trpljenje .
Member States shall ensure that , where appropriate, all procedures are carried out under general or local anaesthesia or using other methods that may alleviate pain or minimise suffering .
Člen 14 – odstavek 2 – točka (c a) (novo)
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point ca (new)
(ca) kjer so analgetiki uporabljeni za preprečitev ali nadzor potencialno hudih bolečin.
(ca) where analgesics are used to prevent or control potential ly severe pain .
Obstaja veliko primerov, pri katerih se bolečina ustrezno nadzoruje z uporabo analgetikov in ne anestezije.
There are many situations where pain is appropriately controlled by the use of analgesics not anaesthetics.
Če se postopek izvaja brez anestezije, se uporabijo analgetiki ali druge primerne metode, s katerimi se zagotovi, da bodo bolečine, trpljenje in stiska, ki se jim ni mogoče izogniti, omejeni na minimum.
If the procedure is carried out without anaesthesia, analgesics or other appropriate methods shall be used to ensure that unavoidable pain, suffering and distress are kept to a minimum.
Če se postopek izvaja brez anestezije, se uporabijo analgetiki ali druge primerne metode, kadar koli bi to koristilo živalim, s katerimi se zagotovi, da bodo bolečine, trpljenje in stiska, ki se jim ni mogoče izogniti, omejeni na minimum.
If the procedure is carried out without anaesthesia, analgesics or other appropriate methods shall be used wherever this would be beneficial to the animal to ensure that unavoidable pain, suffering and distress are kept to a minimum.