natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Precejšen del držav članic je izrazil pomisleke glede takšnega uravnoteženega sistema in med celotno medvladno konferenco leta 2004 smo bili priča predstavitvam predlogov, ki so celo resno ogrožali sedanja pooblastila Evropskega parlamenta na tem področju in bi lahko uničili idejo finančne demokracije v Uniji.
A large number of the Member States were unhappy with this balanced system, and throughout the 2004 Intergovernmental Conference proposals were submitted which in some cases even represented a serious assault on the European Parliament's existing powers in this field and ran the risk of destroying the idea of financial democracy in the Union.
Predvsem zaradi prizadevanj predstavnikov Evropskega parlamenta ter italijanskega in irskega predsedstva je bilo mogoče doseči kompromis, ki kljub vsemu ohranja pravice Parlamenta na tem področju.
Thanks particularly to the efforts of the representatives of the European Parliament and the Italian and Irish Presidencies, a compromise was found which preserves Parliament's key rights in this field.
Leta 2007 o tem kompromisu ni bilo nobenih pomislekov.
This compromise was not called into question in 2007.
Edine spremembe tega poglavja so žal povezane z opustitvijo terminologije zakonodajnih aktov v ustavi
The only changes made to this chapter stem from the regrettable decision to abandon the terminology for legislative acts provided for in the Constitution
- predlogi konvencije o lastnih sredstvih so bili sprejeti;
- the Convention's proposals on own resources were accepted;
- finančni okvir morata vedno sprejeti obe instituciji, vendar bo Svet odločal soglasno, dokler Evropski svet soglasno ne odloči, da Svet lahko odloča s kvalificirano večino;
- the financial framework must always be adopted by the two institutions, but the Council will take decisions unanimously until the European Council, also acting unanimously, rules that the Council may decide by a qualified majority;
- Evropski parlament in Svet skupaj sprejmeta tudi letni proračun, vendar se bo moral v primeru nesoglasja med tema institucijama postopek začeti znova, z novim osnutkom proračuna, ki ga predstavi Komisija
- the annual budget is also adopted jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, but in the event of disagreement between the two institutions the procedure must begin again with the submission by the Commission of a new draft budget
To je splošno pravilo.
This is the general rule.
V posameznih primerih lahko EP z veliko večino še vedno vsili svoje mnenje.
In one specific case Parliament can continue to impose its standpoint, through a very large majority.
Vendar gre za precej teoretično možnost. .
But this is a fairly theoretical possibility. .
S takšno rešitvijo se ohrani bistvo proračunskih pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta, ki se mu zaradi odpravljenega razlikovanja med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki priznava odločilna beseda pri celotnem proračunu.
As has already been said, this solution preserves the European Parliament's most important budgetary powers: Parliament is given a decisive voice on the whole of budget, in view of the abolition of the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure.
Vendar ohranitev soglasja pri sprejemanju večletnega finančnega okvira resno zapleta prihodnja pogajanja na tem področju in slabi spodbujanje proračunskega sodelovanja med institucijami, ki ga predvideva predlog konvencije.
But the retention of the unanimity requirement for the adoption of the multiannual financial framework will seriously complicate future negotiations on the subject and provide less encouragement for the budgetary conciliation between the institutions which was the rationale underlying the Convention's proposal.
Napredek pri sektorskih politikah
Progress on sectoral policies
Določbe v zvezi s spremembami, ki so bile uvedene v politike Unije, so vključene v Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije (razen splošnih pravil o zunanjem delovanju ter določb o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki iz Pogodbe o Evropski uniji).
The provisions dealing with changes to Union policies are, with the exception of the general rules governing external action and the provisions on the CFSP, which form part of the TEU, contained in the TFEU.
Del III vsebuje določbe v zvezi z notranjimi politikami in ukrepi Unije, del IV v zvezi s pridruževanjem čezmorskih dežel in ozemelj ter del V določbe v zvezi z zunanjim delovanjem Unije.
Part III incorporates the provisions dealing with the 'Internal policies and actions of the Union', Part IV those dealing with 'The association of the overseas countries and territories', and Part V those dealing with 'The external action of the Union'.
Nova pogodba se praktično omejuje na uvedbo postopkovnih sprememb v določbe sedanjih pogodb, ki so povezane z opredelitvijo in izvajanjem sektorskih politik ter predvsem s pravnimi podlagami za delovanje Unije na vsakem od področij.
The new Treaty essentially confines itself to incorporating procedural changes into the provisions of the current Treaties concerning the definition and implementation of sectoral policies, particularly the legal bases for the Union's action in each field.
Pri tem lahko morda ugotovimo, da bi bilo mogoče veliko od teh določb poenostaviti ali prilagoditi spremembam, ki so se uveljavile, odkar so bile napisane.
The view might perhaps be taken that many of these provisions could have been simplified or adjusted in the light of the changes which have occurred since they were drafted.
Vendar v resnici pooblastilo, ki ga je Evropski svet v tistem obdobju podelil konvenciji, tej ni omogočalo spreminjanja temeljev teh določb, medvladna konferenca iz leta 2004 tega ni storila in v postopku nadaljevanja pogajanj leta 2007 v resnici ni bilo političnih pogojev za ponovno obravnavo te zahtevne zadeve.
But the fact is that the mandate which the European Council conferred on the Convention at the time did not empower it to revise these provisions in depth, the 2004 IGC did not undertake any such revision, and, when negotiations were resumed in 2007, the political climate was not conducive to any fresh consideration of this very complex issue.
Tako so spremembe, ki so bile uvedene v politike Unije, predvsem posledica strukturnih, institucionalnih in postopkovnih sprememb, ki jih je prinesla nova pogodba, kot so ukinitev „stebrov“, opredelitev pristojnosti Unije, institucij, postopkov odločanja in pravnih sredstev.
Accordingly, the changes made to the provisions governing Union policies are essentially the result of the structural, institutional and procedural revisions introduced by the new Treaty, concerning, for example, the abolition of the 'pillars', the definition of the Union's competences, the institutions, the decision-making procedures and legal instruments.
Na ravni dejanske vsebine politik ni veliko novosti, pri čemer so območje svobode, varnosti in pravice (okvirno, nekdanji „tretji steber“) ter zunanji odnosi, predvsem skupna zunanja in varnostna politika, področja, na katerih so spremembe najobčutljivejše.
As regards the substance of the policies per se, there are few new developments, the area of freedom, security and justice (essentially the former third pillar) and external relations, particularly the common foreign and security policy, being the fields where the changes are most sensitive.
Spremembe pri drugih sektorskih politikah so povezane predvsem z veljavnimi postopki in razdelitvijo pravnih temeljev na zakonodajne in nezakonodajne akte, kar lahko ob upoštevanju pozitivne narave prej analiziranih sprememb že samo po sebi zagotavlja večjo učinkovitost, demokratično legitimnost in preglednost pri delovanju Unije.
As regards the other sectoral policies, the changes mainly concern the procedures applicable and the breakdown of legal bases between legislative and non-legislative acts, which in itself may already constitute a guarantee of greater efficiency, democratic legitimacy and transparency of the Union's action in view of the positive nature of the changes which we have analysed above.
Te nove določbe so se ohranile z nekaterimi spremembami.
These new provisions have been retained with some changes.
Razen tega sta bili uvedeni dve pomembni novosti v zvezi z bojem proti podnebnim spremembam in energetsko solidarnostjo, tj. težavama, s katerima so zelo tesno povezani evropski državljani in v zvezi s katerima bi imelo ukrepanje Unije očitno dodano vrednost.
In addition, two important innovations have been incorporated concerning the fight against climate change and energy solidarity, two areas which have a very direct bearing on the lives of European citizens and in which Union action can have a clear added value.
Ponovno pa gre bolj za nove cilje kot nove pristojnosti.
But these are new objectives, rather than new competences.
Sicer pa smo priča uvedbi začetnega poglavja, v katerem bodo zbrane „horizontalne določbe“, ki so prečno povezane z vsemi politikami.
It should also be noted that an initial chapter has been introduced which lists the horizontal or cross-cutting clauses which apply across the board to all policies.
Preučili bomo glavne vidike teh sprememb, da bi ugotovili, ali Uniji omogočajo učinkovitejše in bolj demokratično delovanje na obravnavanih področjih.
We shall review the main aspects of these changes, with the aim of determining whether they enable the Union to act more efficiently and democratically in the field in question.
(1) Pri notranjih politikah lizbonska pogodba prav na področju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice s posplošitvijo rednega zakonodajnega postopka in glasovanja s kvalificirano večino uvaja največ novosti, predvsem z odpravo stebrne strukture ter vključitvijo pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah in policijskega sodelovanja (kar je doslej izhajalo še iz „tretjega stebra“) v logiko Skupnosti.
(1) In the internal policy sphere, the provisions dealing with the area of freedom, security and justice are those where the greatest changes are to be found, with, in particular, the pillar structure being discontinued and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation (which, up to now, have come under the third pillar) being brought under the 'Community' method through the extension of the ordinary legislative procedure and qualified majority voting.
To je veljalo že za ustavno pogodbo, medtem ko je lizbonska pogodba še znatno spremenila to področje, ki je bistveno za evropsko povezovanje.
This was already the case under the Constitutional Treaty, but the Treaty of Lisbon has made further substantial changes in an area which is now central to the European integration process.
„Komunitarizacija“ nekdanjega tretjega stebra ni preprečila ohranitve nekaterih institucionalnih posebnosti: opredelitev strateških usmeritev zakonodajnega in operativnega načrtovanja, ki jo je Evropski svet (in torej na podlagi soglasja) izvedel brez pridružitve Evropskega parlamenta; delitev zakonodajne pobude med Komisijo in četrtino držav članic (in ne več eno samo članico kot doslej) v pravosodnem sodelovanju pri kazenskih zadevah in policijskem sodelovanju; okrepljena vloga nacionalnih parlamentov, predvsem pri nadzoru nad upoštevanjem načela subsidiarnosti (četrtina namesto tretjine nacionalnih parlamentov za sprožitev zgodnjega opozarjanja), oceni izvajanja politik Unije na tem področju ter nadzoru dejavnosti Eurojusta in Europola.
Despite the ‘Communitisation’ of the former third pillar, specific institutional arrangements nonetheless continue to apply: the strategic guidelines for legislative and operational planning are defined by the European Council (by consensus), without Parliament being involved in any way; the right of legislative initiative in connection with judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation is shared between the Commission and one-quarter of the Member States (rather than a single Member State as is currently the case); and the national parliaments are given a larger role, particularly as regards monitoring compliance with the subsidiarity principle (one-quarter of national parliaments required to trigger the early warning procedure, rather than one-third), the assessment of the implementation of Union policies in this area and scrutiny of the work of Eurojust and Europol.
(2) Cilji politik na tem področju so pojasnjeni, njihova opredelitev pa je poglobljena.
(2) The policy objectives in this area are clarified and defined more precisely.
Delovanje Unije na tem področju je izrecno podrejeno temeljnim pravicam.
Union action is the area is explicitly made subject to respect for fundamental rights.
Dostop do sodnega varstva je potrjen kot splošni cilj.
Access to justice is enshrined as a general objective.
Politike o azilu, priseljevanju, nadzoru meja in vizumih veljajo za skupne politike Unije, ki jih vodita načeli solidarnosti in pravične delitve odgovornosti med državami članicami.
Policies on border checks, asylum and immigration are recognised as common policies of the Union, governed by the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility among Member States.
Predvsem zaradi uporabe rednega zakonodajnega postopka nova pogodba prav tako vzpostavlja pomemben napredek pri pravosodnem sodelovanju v civilnih in kazenskih zadevah ter pri policijskem sodelovanju.
The new Treaty also marks a major step forward in the areas of judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters and of police cooperation, mainly through the application of the ordinary legislative procedure.
(3) Tako je pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah razširjeno na vse zadeve s čezmejnimi posledicami ter temelji na vzajemnem priznavanju sodnih in zunajsodnih odločitev, pri tem pa se za morebitne ukrepe približevanja zakonodaj uporablja redni zakonodajni postopek, razen v zadevah družinskega prava, pri katerih velja pravilo soglasja (uredba Sveta z navadnim mnenjem Evropskega parlamenta).
(3) Judicial cooperation in civil matters is extended to all matters having cross-border implications and is based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and decisions in extrajudicial cases, with the ordinary legislative procedure applying to any measures for the approximation of laws, with the exception of measures concerning family law, in which case unanimity is the rule (Council regulation, with Parliament merely being consulted).
Vendar lahko Svet po posvetovanju s Parlamentom sam soglasno odloči, da redni zakonodajni postopek razširi na določene vidike družinskega prava s čezmejnimi posledicami, če temu ne nasprotuje noben nacionalni parlament.
However, the Council may itself, after consulting Parliament, decide unanimously to extend the ordinary legislative procedure to cover some aspects of family law with cross-border implications, if no national parliament objects.
(4) Največja novost v pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah je, da je redni zakonodajni postopek (kvalificirana večina) predviden za približevanje zakonodaj na procesnem področju (minimalna pravila za omogočanje vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in sodnih odločb itd.) in v materialnem kazenskem pravu: minimalna pravila za opredelitev nekaterih težkih kaznivih dejanj s čezmejnimi posledicami, naštetimi v Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, in tudi kazni.
(4) The major innovation as regards judicial cooperation in criminal matters is that the ordinary legislative procedure (qualified majority) is to be used for the approximation of laws covering both procedural matters (minimum rules to facilitate mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions, etc.) and substantive criminal law, with minimum rules concerning the definition of some serious crimes with cross-border dimensions listed in the TFEU and sanctions.
Nova pogodba prav tako predvideva, da lahko Svet na podlagi soglasja in odobritve Evropskega parlamenta določi še druga področja kazenskega postopka in tudi druga področja kriminala, pri katerih se lahko uporablja redni zakonodajni postopek.
The new Treaty even provides that the Council may, acting unanimously, with Parliament’s consent, identify other aspects of criminal laws procedure and other areas of crime to which the ordinary legislative procedure may apply.
Takšna sprememba je povzročila močan odpor nekaterih držav članic, kljub zagotovilu, da mora evropska zakonodaja na tem področju upoštevati temeljne vidike pravnih sistemov držav članic.
Some Member States were strongly opposed to this, despite the guarantee that European legislation in this area must respect the fundamental aspects of the Member States’ legal systems.
Za nadaljevanje postopka lahko Evropski svet na podlagi soglasja v roku štirih mesecev zadevo predloži Svetu.
That body has four months in which, to take a consensus decision to refer the matter back to the Council, so that the procedure can continue.
Če se v tem štirimesečnem obdobju ne doseže soglasje, se na podlagi zadevnega zakonodajnega predloga in na željo devetih držav članic na tem področju samodejno vzpostavi okrepljeno sodelovanje.
If the dispute cannot be settled during that four-month period, enhanced cooperation will automatically be initiated in the matter concerned, on the basis of the legislative proposal in question, if nine Member States are in favour.
(5) Evropski parlament lahko izrazi tudi zadovoljstvo zaradi dejstva, da je v novi pogodbi ohranjen predlog konvencije o ustanovitvi evropskega javnega tožilstva , pristojnega za boj proti kršitvam, ki bi lahko škodile finančnim interesom Unije, in to bo lahko kljub močnemu nasprotovanju več delegacij med medvladno konferenco leta 2004 preganjalo odgovorne za kršitve.
(5) Parliament can also welcome the fact that the new Treaty incorporates the Convention’s proposal to establish a European Public Prosecutor’s Office , which has responsibility for combating offences damaging to the Union’s financial interests and may prosecute the perpetrators of such offences, despite strong opposition from several delegations during the 2004 IGC.
Tako kot v ustavi se še naprej zahteva soglasje za odobritev evropske uredbe Sveta o njegovi ustanovitvi na podlagi soglasja Evropskega parlamenta, vendar je bila med pogajanji leta 2007 uvedena klavzula, ki je simetrična s tisto iz prejšnjega odstavka in jo lahko imenujemo „klavzula o nujnem pospeševanju“: če soglasje v Svetu ni doseženo, lahko skupina najmanj devetih držav članic zahteva, da se zadeva predloži Evropskemu svetu; če se v Evropskem svetu soglasje doseže, predloži skupina zadevo Svetu, da se postopek lahko nadaljuje; če po izteku štirimesečnega obdobja soglasje v Svetu ni doseženo, lahko najmanj devet držav članic zahteva samodejno okrepljeno sodelovanje.
The stipulation in the Constitution that the Council European regulation establishing the office must be adopted unanimously once Parliament has given its consent has been retained, but the 2007 negotiations led to the introduction of a clause symmetrical to that referred to in the previous paragraph, which might be termed an ‘emergency accelerator’: if unanimity cannot be secured in the Council, a group of at least nine Member States may ask for the proposal to be referred to the European Council; if that body reaches a consensus, it refers the proposal back to the Council so that the procedure can continue; if no consensus has emerged in the European Council after four months, a group of at least nine Member States may request the automatic transition to enhanced cooperation.
Sicer pa je s „premostitveno“ klavzulo na podlagi evropskega sklepa, ki ga po pridobljeni privolitvi Evropskega parlamenta soglasno sprejme Svet, predvidena razširitev pristojnosti evropskega javnega tožilstva na boj proti hudim oblikam kriminala s čezmejnimi posledicami.
Moreover, a 'bridging clause' ('passerelle') provides for the possible extension of the office's responsibilities to cover action to combat serious crimes with a cross-border dimension, by means of a European decision adopted unanimously by the Council after Parliament has given its consent.
(6) Tudi pri policijskem sodelovanju se srečujemo z uvedbo rednega zakonodajnega postopka, čeprav pri operativnem sodelovanju in posredovanju pristojnih oblasti države članice na ozemlju druge države še naprej velja pravilo soglasja.
(6) Lastly, the ordinary legislative procedure has also been introduced for police cooperation , although unanimity continues to be the rule for operational cooperation and intervention by the competent authorities of one Member State on the territory of another.
Tako kot v primeru javnega tožilstva je bila na medvladni konferenci leta 2007 dodana „klavzula o nujnem pospeševanju“, s katero se v primeru zaustavitve postopka na željo najmanj devetih držav članic omogoči okrepljeno sodelovanje.
As in the case of the European Public Prosecutor's Office, the 2007 IGC added an 'emergency accelerator', which, in the event of an impasse, clears the way for enhanced cooperation if at least nine Member States request it.
(7) Nazadnje je treba opozoriti tudi, da so bile zlasti na pobudo Združenega kraljestva, katerega posebno stališče na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev je bilo že priznano (tako kot stališče Irske in, v drugačnem obsegu, stališče Danske
(7) In conclusion, it should also be borne in mind that, primarily at the instigation of the United Kingdom, whose special position in the area of Justice and Home Affairs was already recognised (as was Ireland's and, to a different extent, Denmark's
Združeno kraljestvo je v zameno za soglasje zahtevalo spremembe dveh protokolov o priznanju posebnega položaja Združenega kraljestva in Irske (ki nekako mora slediti Združenemu kraljestvu zaradi vsebine posebnih sporazumov, ki povezujejo ti dve državi članici na tem področju) v zvezi z razvojem območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter zlasti v zvezi z ukrepi za razvoj schengenskega pravnega reda.
In return for its agreement, the United Kingdom demanded changes to the two protocols recognising the specific position of the United Kingdom and Ireland (which in some ways has no choice but to fall into line with the United Kingdom, given the substance of the specific agreements concluded between the two Member States in this area) on the development of the area of freedom, security and justice and, in particular, on the measures to build on the Schengen acquis.
Stališče teh dveh držav izhaja iz dveh posebnih faktorjev: državi sta otoka, njuni prebivalci nimajo osebnih izkaznic in uporabljata sistem „običajnega prava“.
The position of these two Member States is the result of special factors: they are islands, they have no identity card system for their residents and they have a system of common law.
Tako so bila pravila o odstopanju, ki že obstajajo za Združeno kraljestvo in Irsko na področju politike priseljevanja, azila in vizumov ter pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah, razširjena na pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah in na policijsko sodelovanje
As a result, the derogations already granted to the United Kingdom and Ireland in the area of immigration, asylum and visa policy and judicial cooperation in civil matters has been extended to cover judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation
Protokol o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice. .
Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland on the area of freedom, security and justice. .
Kar zadeva schengenski pravni red, s katerim je Svet sprejel, da lahko Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sodelujeta v posameznih primerih, če sodelujeta tudi pri razvoju teh delnih ukrepov, tema dvema državama ni treba obvezno sodelovati pri teh ukrepih za razvoj, če tega ne želita.
As regards the Schengen acquis, in which the Council had agreed that the United Kingdom and Ireland would participate on a case-by-case basis, provided that they also participated in the measures to build on the relevant parts of the acquis, the two Member States will not now be required to participate in these measures if they do not wish to.
Vendar lahko delno ali v celoti odstopata od schengenskega območja, če se tako odloči Svet, Evropski svet ali, nazadnje, Komisija
However, they may be excluded from all or part of the Schengen area in question if the Council, the European Council or, in the final analysis, the Commission so decides