natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Direktiva o sežiganju odpadkov določa strog regulativni režim in standarde delovanja, ki zagotavljajo visoko raven zdravja ljudi in varstva okolja.
The Waste Incineration Directive provides a strict regulatory regime as well as operating standards that ensure high levels of public health and environmental protection.
Deklasifikacija takšnih tokov odpadkov pomeni, da njihovo izgorevanje ne bo več predmet niti direktive o sežiganju odpadkov niti pravil o pošiljkah odpadkov.
Declassifying such waste streams means that their combustion will no longer be subject to the Waste Incineration Directive nor the waste shipment regulations.
To bi lahko imelo ravno nasproten učinek na okolje.
This could lead to perverse environmental impacts.
Člen 5 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 ‑ subparagraph 2 a (new)
Merila upoštevajo vsako tveganje pri uporabi, škodljivi za okolje, ali odpremi snovi ali predmetov in se določijo tako, da zagotavljajo visoko raven varovanja zdravja ljudi in varstva okolja.
The criteria shall take into account any risks of environmentally harmful use or shipment of the substance or object, and shall be set at a level that guarantees a high level of protection for human health and the environment.
Ta predlog spremembe ponovno uvaja besedilo predloga Komisije, ki ga je Svet črtal.
This amendment reintroduces the text of the Commission proposal, which the Council has deleted.
Ko odpadki prenehajo biti odpadki je treba po mnenju Parlamenta posebno pozornost nameniti obvladovanju tveganja in doseganju visoke ravni varovanja zdravja ljudi in varstva okolja.
It is important to the Parliament to give a high priority to the containment of risk and the achievement of a high level of protection for human health and the environment when waste ceases to be a waste.
Člen 5 – odstavek 2
Article 5 ‑ paragraph 2
Ukrepi v zvezi s sprejetjem takih meril in v katerih so opredeljeni odpadki, namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 36(2).
The measures relating to the adoption of such criteria and specifying the waste, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 36(2).
Komisija po potrebi na podlagi presoje v skladu z odstavkom 1, do ...* poda zakonodajni predlog, ki določa merila za okolje in kakovost, ki jih je treba izpolniti, da se o specifičnih proizvodih, surovinah ali kategorijah snovi odpadkov lahko sodi, da so prenehali biti odpadki.
By ... * the Commission shall, if appropriate, on the basis of its assessment pursuant to paragraph 1, put forward a legislative proposal specifying the environmental and quality criteria to be met in order for specific products, materials or substance categories of waste to be deemed to have ceased to be waste .
Za oblikovanje meril, kdaj odpadki prenehajo biti odpadki, bi moral ponovno veljati postopek soodločanja in ne postopek komitologije (predlog spremembe 45 iz prve obravnave).
The development of environmental criteria for deciding end of waste status should be brought back under co decision, rather than comitology (based on the ideas of amendment 45 from first reading).
Poleg tega se večkrat predlaga, da se na seznamu določenih snovi preveri status, kdaj odpadki prenehajo biti odpadki, ko npr. steklo in papir.
This is in addition to calling for possible proposals on the list of specified substances to be examined for end-of-waste status, such as glass and paper.
Člen 5 – odstavek 3
Article 5 ‑ paragraph 3
Odpadki, ki v skladu z odstavkoma 1 in 2 prenehajo biti odpadki, prav tako prenehajo biti odpadki za namene ciljev predelave in recikliranja iz direktiv 94/62/ES, 2000/53/ES, 2002/96/ES in 2006/66/ES ter druge ustrezne zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Waste which ceases to be waste in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2, shall also cease to be waste for the purpose of the recovery and recycling targets set out in Directives 94/62/EC, 2000/53/EC, 2002/96/EC and 2006/66/EC and other relevant Community legislation.
Odpadki, ki v skladu z odstavkoma 1 in 2 prenehajo biti odpadki, ustrezajo ciljem predelave in recikliranja iz direktiv 94/62/ES, 2000/53/ES, 2002/96/ES in 2006/66/ES ter druge ustrezne zakonodaje Skupnosti le po končanem postopku ponovne uporabe, recikliranja ali predelave .
Waste which ceases to be waste in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall only count towards the recovery and recycling targets set out in Directives 94/62/EC, 2000/53/EC, 2002/96/EC and 2006/66/EC and other relevant Community legislation when the re-use, recycling or recovery operation is completed.
Odstavek skupnega stališča je razširjen in se rahlo razlikuje od prvotnega besedila Komisije.
This paragraph of the Common Position has been expanded and slightly reworded compared to the original Commission text.
Namen predloga spremembe je večja jasnost.
The amendment is designed to introduce greater clarification.
Za ohranitev celovitosti koncepta recikliranja je zelo pomembno, da se koncepta prenehanja statusa odpadka ne zamenjuje z recikliranjem, kar je tudi namen tega predloga spremembe.
In order to preserve the integrity of the concept of recycling it is important not to confuse the end of waste with recycling and this is the aim of the amendment.
Člen 5 – odstavek 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Če se merila na ravni Skupnosti na podlagi postopka iz odstavkov 1 in 2 niso določila, lahko države članice glede na posamezen primer odločijo, ali so določeni odpadki prenehali biti odpadki, ob upoštevanju veljavne sodne prakse.
Where criteria have not been set at Community level under the procedure set out in paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States may decide case by case whether certain waste has ceased to be waste taking into account the applicable case law.
O takšnih odločitvah uradno obvestijo Komisijo v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov o storitvah informacijske družbe, kadar ta direktiva to zahteva.
They shall notify the Commission of such decisions in accordance with Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services where so required by that Directive.
Črta se novi odstavek, ki ga predlaga Svet.
Deletion of a new paragraph introduced by the Council.
Sprememba 12, ki jo predlaga poročevalec, pravi, da merila, kdaj odpadki prenehajo biti odpadki, določajo s predlogom komisije, zato določba, da o tem odločajo posamezne države članice, ni več potrebna.
Following amendment 12 of the rapporteur, which covers the issue of end of waste criteria through a commission proposal, a provision to leave it up to individual member states is not necessary any more.
Odstavek se črta tudi zato, da se izognemo neusklajenim seznamom odpadkov in nepošteni konkurenci.
Above that, to avoid unharmonised waste lists and to avoid unfair competition, this paragraph has to be deleted.
Člen 5 – odstavek 4 a (novo)
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Komisija po potrebi do …* poda predloge, v katerih se določi, ali vsaj spodaj navedeni tokovi odpadkov sodijo v okvir določb tega člena, in če, kakšne specifikacije bi morale zanje veljati: kompost, agregati, papir, steklo, kovine, izrabljene pnevmatike in odpadni tekstil.
By..........* the Commission shall, if appropriate, make proposals for determining whether at least the following waste streams fall under the provisions of this Article, and if so what specifications should apply to them: compost, aggregates, paper, glass, metal, end-of-life tyres, and waste textiles.
* 5 letih po začetku veljavnosti te direktive.
*5 years after the entry into force of this Directive.
Ta predlog spremembe (predlog spremembe 45 iz prve obravnave) je Svet prestavil med uvodne izjave, kjer je uvrščen na seznam stvari, ki „bi jih morala direktiva pojasniti“, vendar jih ne.
This amendment (amendment 45 in first reading) was transposed by the Council into a recital where it is listed among the things that the directive "should clarify" - but does not.
Izraz „rabljena oblačila“ je sedaj spremenjen v „odpadni tekstil“ zaradi usklajenosti z določbami Evropskega kataloga odpadkov, Odločba Komisije 2000/532/ES.
The words 'second hand clothing' have now been changed to 'waste textiles' in order to conform to the terms of the European Waste Catalogue, Commission decision 2000/532/EC.
Člen 6 – odstavek 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Država članica lahko obravnava odpadek kot nevaren odpadek, čeprav ta kot tak ni uvrščen na seznam odpadkov, če ima eno ali več lastnosti iz Priloge III.
A Member State may consider waste as hazardous waste where, even though it does not appear as such on the list of waste, it displays one or more of the properties listed in Annex III.
Država članica o vseh takšnih primerih uradno obvesti Komisijo v poročilu, predvidenem v členu 34(1), in ji predloži vse ustrezne podatke.
The Member State shall notify the Commission of any such cases in the report provided for in Article 34(1) and shall provide the Commission with all relevant information.
Seznam se glede na prejeta uradna obvestila pregleda, da se odloči o njegovi prilagoditvi.
In the light of notifications received, the list shall be reviewed in order to decide on its adaptation.
Predlog spremembe, ki ga je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi (predlog spremembe 50).
Amendment adopted by Parliament at first reading (amendment 50).
Po mnenju parlamenta je zelo pomembno zagotoviti, da razveljavitev direktive o nevarnih odpadkih ne pomeni zniževanja varnostnih standardov.
Parliament gives a high priority to ensuring that the repeal of the Hazardous Waste Directive does not mean any lowering of standards of protection.
Člen 6 – odstavki 3, 3 a (novo), 4 in 4 a (novo)
Article 6 – paragraphs 3, 3 a (new), 4 and 4 a (new)
Kadar lahko država članica dokaže, da določen odpadek, ki je na seznam uvrščen kot nevaren odpadek, nima nobene izmed lastnosti iz Priloge III, lahko ta odpadek obravnava kot nenevaren odpadek .
Where a Member State has evidence to show that specific waste that appears on the list as hazardous waste does not display any of the properties listed in Annex III, it may consider that waste as non-hazardous waste.
Država članica o vseh takšnih primerih uradno obvesti Komisijo v poročilu, predvidenem v členu 34(1), in ji predloži vse potrebne dokaze.
The Member State shall notify the Commission of any such cases in the report provided for in Article 34(1) and shall provide the Commission with the necessary evidence.
Kadar lahko država članica dokaže, da določen odpadek, ki je na seznam uvrščen kot nevaren odpadek, nima nobene izmed lastnosti iz Priloge III, o vseh takšnih primerih nemudoma obvesti Komisijo in ji predloži vse potrebne dokaze.
Where a Member State has evidence to show that specific waste that appears on the list as hazardous waste does not display any of the properties listed in Annex III, it shall notify any such cases immediately to the Commission and shall provide the Commission with the necessary evidence.
Nevarnih odpadkov se ne sme razvrstiti med nenevarne zgolj z redčenjem ali mešanjem odpadkov, tako da se zniža začetna koncentracija onesnaževal pod raven, po katero je odpadek nevaren.
The reclassification of hazardous waste as non-hazardous waste may not be achieved by diluting or mixing the waste with the aim of lowering the initial concentrations of pollutants to a level below the thresholds for defining waste as hazardous.
Ukrepi v zvezi z revizijo seznama, da se odloči o njegovi prilagoditvi v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3, namenjeni spremembi nebistvenih določb te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 36(2).
The measures relating to the revision of the list in order to decide on its adaptation pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 36(2).
Ponovno je bil vložen predlog spremembe 46 s prve obravnave EP.
Re-tabling of amendment 46 of EP first reading.
Ponovno se vstavi predlog spremembe 51/172 iz prve obravnave.
Reintroduces amendment 51/172 from first reading.
Prvi del predloga spremembe se nanaša na skrb Parlamenta za ohranitev visokega standarda zaščite in poročanja.
The first part of the amendment relates to Parliament's concern to maintain a high standard of protection and reporting.
Drugi del predstavlja potrebno pojasnilo.
The second part represents a necessary clarification.
Člen 6 – odstavek 4 b (novo)
Article 6 – paragraph 4 b (new)
Komisija zagotovi, da je seznam odpadkov in vsak pregled tega seznama v skladu z načeli jasnosti, razumevanja in dostopnosti uporabnikom, zlasti malim in srednje velikim podjetjem.
The Commission shall ensure that the list of wastes and any review of this list adhere to principles of clarity, comprehensibility and accessibility for users, particularly SMEs.
Predlog je podoben predlogu spremembe 36, sprejetim v prvi obravnavi (Komisija zagotovi, da je seznam za mala in srednje velika podjetja dovolj razumljiv ter da je lahko dostopen).
A similar amendment to Amendment 36, which was adopted at first reading (‘The Commission shall ensure that this list is sufficiently easily understandable to SMEs and easily accessible’).
Seznam odpadkov v sedanji obliki je kompleksen dokument, kar je v nasprotju s cilji boljše in enostavnejše priprave zakonodaje, za kar se zavzemajo evropske institucije.
The list of wastes in its current form is a complex document which is at odds with the objectives of better lawmaking and simplification advocated by the European institutions.
Člen 7 – odstavek 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Države članice lahko za namen preprečevanja in predelave odpadkov sprejmejo zakonodajne in nezakonodajne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovijo, da za vse fizične ali pravne osebe, ki poklicno razvijajo, proizvajajo , izdelujejo ali prodajajo proizvode in ravnajo z njimi (proizvajalec proizvoda) , velja razširjena odgovornost proizvajalca.
In order to strengthen the prevention and recovery of waste, Member States may take legislative or non-legislative measures to ensure that any natural or legal person who professionally develops, manufactures, processes and treats or sells products (producer of the product) has extended producer responsibility.
Države članice za namen preprečevanja , predelave , ponovne uporabe in recikliranja odpadkov po potrebi sprejmejo zakonodajne in nezakonodajne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovijo, da za vse fizične ali pravne osebe, ki poklicno proizvajajo proizvode ali jih uvažajo na ozemlje Skupnosti , velja razširjena odgovornost proizvajalca.
In order to strengthen the prevention, recovery, re-use and recycling of waste, Member States shall, where appropriate, take legislative or non-legislative measures to ensure that any natural or legal person who professionally manufactures products, or imports products into the territory of the Community, has extended producer responsibility.
Takšni ukrepi lahko vključujejo sprejemanje vrnjenih proizvodov in odpadkov, ki ostanejo po uporabi takšnih proizvodov, pa tudi nadaljnje ravnanje z odpadki in finančno odgovornost za takšne dejavnosti.
Such measures may include an acceptance of returned products and of the waste that remains after those products have been used, as well as the subsequent management of the waste and financial responsibility for such activities.
Ti ukrepi lahko vključujejo dolžnost zagotavljanja javno dostopnih informacij o tem, v kakšni meri je proizvod mogoče ponovno uporabiti in reciklirati.
These measures may include the obligation to provide publicly available information as to the extent to which the product is re-usable and recyclable.
Predlog spremembe temelji na predlogih sprememb, sprejetih v prvi obravnavi (predloga sprememb 35 in 37) in prilagojenih sedanjemu besedilu Sveta.
Amendment based on amendments adopted in first reading (amendments 35 and 37) adapted to the current text of the Council.
V besedilu Sveta takšni ukrepi niso obvezni, Parlament pa v svojem predlogu spremembe k staremu členu 5 meni, da bi morali biti obvezni.
The Council's text makes such measures optional whereas the Parliament believes, in its amendment to old Article 5, that they should be compulsory.
Parlament pripisuje velik pomen sodelovanju javnosti v postopkih ponovne uporabe in recikliranja.
The Parliament place a high priority on involving the public in the reuse and recycling processes.
Člen 7 – odstavek 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Države članice lahko sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za spodbujanje oblikovanja proizvodov, da bi zmanjšali njihove vplive na okolje in nastajanje odpadkov med proizvodnjo in poznejšo uporabo proizvodov ter zagotovili, da se predelava in odstranjevanje proizvodov, ko postanejo odpadki, izvajata v skladu s členoma 10 in 11.
Member States may take appropriate measures to encourage the design of products in order to reduce their environmental impacts and the generation of waste in the course of the production and subsequent use of products, and in order to ensure that the recovery and disposal of products that have become waste take place in accordance with Articles 10 and 11.
Proizvajalci sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za oblikovanje proizvodov, da bi zmanjšali njihove vplive na okolje in nastajanje odpadkov med proizvodnjo in poznejšo uporabo proizvodov ter zagotovili, da se predelava in odstranjevanje proizvodov, ko postanejo odpadki, izvajata v skladu s členoma 10 in 11.
Producers shall take appropriate measures to design products in order to reduce their environmental impacts and the generation of waste in the course of the production and subsequent use of products, and in order to ensure that the recovery and disposal of products that have become waste take place in accordance with Articles 10 and 11.
Države članice lahko v skladu z odstavkom 1 sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za spodbujanje oblikovanja proizvodov za iste namene.
Member States may take appropriate measures, in accordance with paragraph 1, to encourage the design of products to the same ends.
Takšni ukrepi lahko med drugim spodbujajo razvoj, proizvodnjo in trženje proizvodov, ki so primerni za večkratno uporabo, ki so tehnično trpežni in ki so potem, ko postanejo odpadki, primerni za ustrezno in varno predelavo ter okoljsko sprejemljivo odstranjevanje.
Such measures may encourage, inter alia , the development, production and marketing of products that are suitable for multiple use, that are technically durable and that are, after having become waste, suitable for proper and safe recovery and environmentally compatible disposal.
To vključuje dolžnosti proizvajalcev ali uvoznikov, da zagotovijo javno dostopne informacije o tem, v kakšni meri je odpadni proizvod mogoče reciklirati.
This should include the obligation on producers or importers to provide publicly available information as to the extent to which the waste product is recyclable.
Odgovornost za preprečevanje in recikliranje odpadkov bi morali nositi.
The responsibility for design for prevention and recycling should lie on producers.
Države članice pa bi to morale spodbujati z ustreznimi ukrepi, po potrebi tudi z zakonodajnimi zahtevami za določene prednostne vrste proizvodov, kot pri odpadni električni in elektronski opremi.
Member states should then back this up with appropriate measures to encourage this, if necessary with legislative requirements on specific priority product areas – as has been done with waste electronic and electrical equipment.
Za spodbujanje ustreznih postopkov recikliranja morajo proizvajalci ali uvozniki zagotoviti informacije o tem, v kakšni meri je njihove proizvode, ko postanejo odpadki, mogoče reciklirati.
In order to promote appropriate recycling operations, producers or importers should provide information on the extent to which their products are recyclable when they become a waste.
Države članice sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za spodbujanje vzpostavitve objektov in naprav, ki omogočajo popravila in ponovno uporabo, ter objektov in naprav za ločeno zbiranje, sprejemanje in odgovorno odstranjevanje proizvodov ob koncu njihove življenjske dobe.
Member States shall take appropriate measures to encourage the establishment of facilities to make repair and re-use possible and of facilities for separate collection, take back and disposal of products in a responsible manner at the end of their life.
Predlog spremembe temelji na predlogu spremembe, ki ga je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi (predlog spremembe 35).
Based on an amendment adopted by Parliament at first reading (amendment 35).
Parlament je menil, da je to besedilo potrebno za okrepitev njegove podpore objektom in napravam za popravilo in ponovno uporabo.
Parliament believed that this text is necessary to reinforce its support for repair and reuse facilities.
Člen 7 – odstavek 2b (novo)
Article 7 - paragraph 2b (new)
Države članice v svojem poročilu o izvajanju poročajo Komisiji o izvajanju tega člena v skladu s členom 34.
Member States shall report to the Commission on the implementation of this Article in their implementation report pursuant to Article 34 .
(Delno se ponovno vloži predlog spremembe 35 iz prve obravnave v spremenjeni obliki.)
(Partial reinstatement of amendment 35 from first reading in a modified form)
Predlog spremembe, ki ga je Parlament predlagal v prvi obravnavi (predlog spremembe 35).
Amendment moved by Parliament at first reading (Amendment 35).
Za zagotovitev učinkovitosti takšnih shem je potrebno stalno spremljanje odgovornosti proizvajalca.
It is necessary to have continuous monitoring of producer responsibility to ensure that such schemes are effective.
Če morajo ukrepi držav članic o razširjeni odgovornosti proizvajalca ostati prostovoljne narave, bi morale države članice vsaj poročati o vseh sprejetih ukrepih v zvezi s tem, da se olajšajo ukrepi Skupnosti.
If action by Member States on extended producer responsibility is to remain voluntary, then they should at least report on all actions taken in this respect, with a view to facilitate Community action.
Člen 7 – odstavek 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Razširjena odgovornost proizvajalca se uporabi brez poseganja v odgovornost za ravnanje z odpadki iz člena 13(1).
The extended producer responsibility shall be applied without prejudice to the responsibility for waste management as provided for in Article 13(1).
Razširjena odgovornost proizvajalca se uporabi brez poseganja v odgovornost za ravnanje z odpadki iz člena 13(1) in brez poseganja v veljavno zakonodajo o določenih tokovih odpadkov .
The extended producer responsibility shall be applied without prejudice to the responsibility for waste management as provided for in Article 13(1) and without prejudice to existing waste stream specific legislation.
Predlog spremembe pojasnjuje določbo, na novo uvedeno v skupnem stališču Sveta.
Clarifies a provision that has been newly introduced by the Council in its common position.
Krepi izvajanje posebne zakonodaje o obstoječih tokovih odpadkov.
Strengthens implementation of existing waste stream specific legislation.
Države članice v skladu s členoma 1 in 3a in ob upoštevanju člena 7 in Direktive 2005/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. julija 2005 o vzpostavitvi okvira za določanje zahtev za okoljsko primerno zasnovo izdelkov, ki rabijo energijo 1 , sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da do leta 2012 stabilizirajo svoje skupno nastajanje odpadkov glede na svoje skupno nastajanje odpadkov v letu 2009.
Member States shall, in accordance with Articles 1 and 3a, and taking account of Article 7 and of Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products 1 , take all necessary measures to stabilise their overall waste production by 2012 as compared to their overall annual waste production in 2009.