natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ko se predlaga njihovo članstvo, kandidati opravljajo – ali so opravljali – visoke sodne ali preiskovalne funkcije in imajo najmanj 10 let praktičnih delovnih izkušenj na vodilnem delovnem mestu.
At the time of selection the candidates should occupy or have occupied a senior judicial post or an executive investigative post and have operational professional experience of at least ten years in a position of high management responsibility.
Znaten del teh delovnih izkušenj morajo pridobiti na področju boja proti goljufijam na nacionalni ravni ali na ravni Skupnosti.
A significant portion of this professional experience sh ould be acquired in the area of the fight against national and/or Community fraud.
Postopek imenovanja lahko traja največ devet mesecev.
The appointment procedure should be completed within nine months.
Generalnega direktorja predlagata Evropski parlament in Svet na podlagi skupnega dogovora, imenuje pa ga Komisija.
The Direc tor Gen eral will be designated by common agreement between the European Parliament and the Council and will be appointed by the Commission.
11a) Glede na občutljiv značaj delovnega mesta generalnega direktorja Urada je treba določiti, da ta obvesti Komisijo, če namerava opravljati nov poklic v roku 2 let po preteku svojega mandata, v skladu s členom 16 Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropske skupnosti.
(11a) Considering the sensitivity of the position, it is approp ria te to stipulate that the Direc tor Gen eral of the Office will inform the Commission if he/she intends to engage in any new occupational activity within two years of the end of his/her service, in conformity with A rticle 16 of the Sta ff Regulations of Officials of the European Communit ies .
Ta informacija je vključena v letno poročilo Komisije o boju proti goljufijam.
This information figures in the annual anti-fraud report of the Commission.
(12) Za krepitev spoštovanja postopkovnih jamstev naj se zahteva , da revizijski svetovalec popolnoma neodvisno poda mnenje , na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo v primeru mnenj, ki zadevajo taka jamstva, in da poda mnenja v nekaterih drugih primerih, zlasti na zahtevo vpletenih oseb .
(12) In order to strengthen respect for procedural guarantees, a Review Adviser should be required to deliver an opinion, in complete independence, of his own motion or on requests for opinions relating to such guarantees, and to give opinions in certain other cases, in particular on requests made by the person implicated personally .
(12) Za krepitev spoštovanja postopkovnih jamstev naj se zahteva možnost, da vsaka oseba, o kateri teče preiskava Urada, lahko pri nadzornem odboru vloži pritožbo.
(12) In order to strengthen respect for procedural guarantees, any person who is under investigation by the Office should be able to lodge a complaint with the Supervisory Committee.
Pritožbe popolnoma neodvisno obravnava revizijski svetovalec , ki ga imenuje generalni direktor na predlog nadzornega odbora.
Complaints will be dealt with by a Review Adviser acting in complete independence, appointed by the Direc tor Gen eral, on a proposal of the Supervisory Committee.
Revizijski svetovalec predloži svoje mnenje v 30 delovnih dneh in ga sporoči pritožniku, generalnemu direktorju Urada in nadzornemu odboru .
The Review Adviser will deliver his opinion within 30 working days and will forward it to the plaintiff, to the Direc tor Gen eral of the Office and to the Supervisory Committee .
(13a) Po štirih letih veljavnosti te uredbe je treba oceniti njeno izvajanje.
(13a) After a four-year period the application of this Regulation should be ass essed.
Komisija bi morala Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti poročilo, ki mu je priloženo mnenje nadzornega odbora.
The Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, accompanied by an opinion issued by the Supervisory Committee .
Po tej oceni bi bilo treba omogočiti revizijo te uredbe.
Following that assessment this Regulation should be revisable.
V vsakem primeru bi bilo treba to uredbo pregledati po ustanovitvi Evropskega javnega tožilstva.
In any event, th is Regulation should be revised after the creation of a Euro pean Public Prosecutor’s Office .
–1a) Člen 1(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 1(1) is replaced by the following:
Za okrepitev boja proti goljufijam, korupciji in drugim nezakonitim dejanjem, ki vplivajo na finančne interese Evropske skupnosti, Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam, ustanovljen s Sklepom Komisije št. 1999/352/ES, ECPJ, Euratom (v nadaljevanju „urad“) izvaja pooblastila preiskovanja, prenesena na Komisijo s pravili, predpisi in sporazumi Skupnosti, v državah članicah ter, v skladu z veljavnimi sporazumi o sodelovanju, v tretjih državah .“
In order to step up the fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the European Community, the European Anti-Fraud Office established by Commission Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom (hereinafter “the Office”) shall exercise the powers of investigation conferred on the Commission by the Community rules and Regulations in the Member States and, in accordance with the cooperation agreements in force, in third countries.
Goljufije, korupcija in drugo nezakonito ravnanje, ki škodi finančnim interesom Skupnosti, vključno z nepravilnostmi, so opredeljene v uredbi Skupnosti in določbah sporazumov, ki veljajo na tem področju.“
Fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity detrimental to the Community’s financial interests, including irregularity, are defined in Community regulations and the provisions of agreements in force in this field. ”
Sporazumi, sklenjeni med Komisijo in tretjimi državami na tem področju, so pomembna osnova, ki omogoča uradu OLAF, da opravlja svojo nalogo ter da ščiti sredstva Skupnosti, ki so dodeljena zunaj njenih meja.
Agreements between the Commission and third countries in this field are an important basis for enabling OLAF to carry out its task and protecting Community funds extended beyond the Community’s frontiers.
Uporabljajo se opredelitve pojmov goljufija, korupcija in drugo nezakonito ravnanje iz predpisov Skupnosti v zvezi s tem (vključno s finančno uredbo) in sporazumih (Konvencija o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti in njeni protokoli iz leta 1995).
The definitions of fraud, corruption and other illegal activity are those laid down in Community regulations on the subject (including the Financial Regulation) and the provisions of agreements (the 1995 PIF Convention and its protocols).
Člen 1 – točka -1 a (novo)
Article 1 – point -1a (new)
–1a) Člen 1(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(-1a) Article 1(2) is replaced by the following text:
Urad državam članicam zagotavlja pomoč Komisije pri organizaciji tesnega in rednega sodelovanja med pristojnimi organi, za usklajevanje svoje aktivnosti za varstvo finančnih interesov Evropske skupnosti pred goljufijami.
The Office shall provide the Member States with assistance from the Commission in organising close and regular cooperation between their competent authorities in order to coordinate their activities for the purpose of protecting the European Community's financial interests against fraud.
Urad prispeva k oblikovanju in razvoju postopkov za preprečevanje in za boj proti goljufijam , korupciji in drugim nezakonitim ravnanjem, ki vplivajo na finančne interese Evropske skupnosti.“
The Office shall contribute to the design and development of methods of preventing and of fighting fraud , corruption and any other illegal activity affecting the financial intere sts of the European Community.".
Člen 3 – odstavek 1 – alinea 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Kot del svoje preiskovalne funkcije Urad v državah članicah opravlja inšpekcije in preglede, predvidene v členu 9(1) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95 in v področnih pravilih iz člena 9(2) te iste uredbe, ter v tretjih državah v skladu z veljavnimi sporazumi o sodelovanju.
As part of its investigative function, the Office shall carry out the inspections and checks provided for in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 and in the sectoral rules referred to in Article 9(2) of that Regulation in the Member States and, in accordance with the cooperation agreements in force, in third countries.
Kot del svoje preiskovalne funkcije Urad v državah članicah opravlja inšpekcije in preglede, predvidene v členu 9(1) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95 in v področnih pravilih iz člena 9(2) te iste uredbe, ter v tretjih državah in mednarodnih organizacijah v skladu z veljavnimi sporazumi o sodelovanju.
As part of its investigative function, the Office shall carry out the inspections and checks provided for in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 and in the sectoral rules referred to in Article 9(2) of that Regulation in the Member States and, in accordance with the cooperation agreements in force, in third countries and in international organisations .
Da bi Urad ugotovil, ali je prišlo do goljufije, korupcije ali katerega koli drugega nezakonitega ravnanja iz člena 1 v povezavi s sporazumom ali sklepom o nepovratnih sredstvih ali pogodbo o financiranju Skupnosti, lahko v skladu s postopki iz Uredbe (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96 , opravi preglede in inšpekcije na kraju dejanj v gospodarskih subjektih, ki so predmet takih ugotovitev.
With a view to establishing that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 in connection with a grant agreement or decision or a contract concerning Community funding, the Office may, in accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, conduct on‑the‑spot checks and inspections on economic operators concerned by such funding.
Da bi Urad ugotovil, ali je prišlo do goljufije, korupcije ali katerega koli drugega nezakonitega ravnanja iz člena 1 v povezavi s sporazumom ali sklepom o nepovratnih sredstvih ali pogodbo o financiranju Skupnosti, lahko v skladu s postopki iz Uredbe (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96 posredno ali neposredno opravi preglede in inšpekcije na kraju dejanj v gospodarskih subjektih, ki so predmet takih ugotovitev.
With a view to establishing that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 in connection with a grant agreement or decision or a contract concerning Community funding, the Office may, in accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, conduct on‑the‑spot checks and inspections on economic operators concerned directly or indirectly by such funding.
Glede na preiskovalne postopke iz te uredbe, ki povzemajo postopke iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2185/96, je pri Uredbi (ES) št. 1073/99 za gospodarske subjekte treba predvideti enako področje uporabe, kot velja za Uredbo (ES) št. 2185/96, da bi se tako izboljšala učinkovitost preiskav urada OLAF.
As the methods of investigation provided for by the Regulation in question coincide with those previously provided for by Regulation (EC) No 2185/96, it is desirable to define the same scope for Regulation (EC) No 1073/99 as for Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 as regards economic operators, in order to improve the effectiveness of OLAF's investigations.
Člen 3 – odstavek 2 – alinea 1 a (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Države članice sprejmejo in izvajajo vse potrebne ukrepe, da Urad lahko opravlja preiskave, kot je predvideno v tem členu.
The Member States shall adopt and implement all the measures required in order to ensure that the Office performs the investigative function referred to in this Article.
Uradu nudijo podporo pri inšpekcijah in pregledih gospodarskih subjektov na kraju samem, ki jih posredno ali neposredno zadeva financiranje Skupnosti in ki so bili opravljeni v skladu s postopkom iz Uredbe (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96.
They shall offer their support to the Office in connection with on-the-spot inspections and checks carried out in accordance with the rules laid down in Regulation (Euratom , EC ) No 2185/96 on economic operators concerned directly or indirectly by Community funding.
Treba je opozoriti, da imajo v skladu s to uredbo pristojni organi držav članic dolžnost, da pred začetkom preiskave sodelujejo z uradom OLAF v skladu s postopkom iz Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2185/96.
It is necessary to recall, in this Regulation, the obligations incumbent on the competent authorities of the Member States to cooperate with OLAF during the stage preliminary to the opening of an investigation in accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2185/96.
Med zunanjo preiskavo in ko je nujno potrebno, da se ugotovi, ali je prišlo do goljufije, korupcije ali katerega koli drugega nezakonitega ravnanja iz člena 1, ima Urad lahko dostop do vseh zadevnih podatkov, ki jih imajo institucije, organi, uradi in agencije, povezane z zadevo, ki je predmet preiskave.
During an external investigation and where strictly necessary in order to establish that fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 has occurred, the Office may have access to any relevant information held by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies connected with the matter under investigation.
Uporablja se člen 4(2) in (4).
Article 4(2) and (4) shall apply for that purpose.
Med zunanjo preiskavo in ko je potrebno, da se ugotovi, ali je prišlo do goljufije, korupcije ali katerega koli drugega nezakonitega ravnanja iz člena 1, ima Urad lahko dostop do vseh zadevnih podatkov, ki jih imajo institucije, organi, uradi in agencije, povezane z zadevo, ki je predmet preiskave.
During an external investigation and where necessary in order to establish that fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 has occurred, the Office may have access to any relevant information held by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies connected with the matter under investigation.
V okviru preiskav urada OLAF je treba olajšati dostop do informacij, ki jih imajo institucije.
It is desirable to facilitate the investigations of OLAF in respect of access to information held by the institutions.
Če ima Urad pred začetkom preiskave podatke o domnevni goljufiji, korupciji ali drugem nezakonitem ravnanju iz člena 1, lahko direktor obvesti pristojne organe zadevnih držav članic in navedeni organi lahko brez poseganja v sektorske predpise zagotovijo ustrezne nadaljnje ukrepe in po potrebi začnejo opravljati preiskave v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, v katerih lahko sodeluje osebje Urada.
Where the Office has to hand, prior to an investigation, information which suggests that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, the Director General of the Office may inform the competent authorities of the Member States concerned and, without prejudice to the sectoral rules, those authorities shall ensure that appropriate action is taken and, where necessary, undertake investigations in accordance with national law, in which staff of the Office may take part.
Pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic obvestijo generalnega direktorja Urada o svojih ugotovitvah na podlagi takih podatkov.“
The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall inform the Director‑General of the Office of their findings on the basis of such information.
Če ima Urad pred začetkom preiskave podatke o domnevni goljufiji, korupciji ali drugem nezakonitem ravnanju iz člena 1, direktor obvesti pristojne organe zadevnih držav članic in navedeni organi lahko brez poseganja v sektorske predpise zagotovijo ustrezne nadaljnje ukrepe in po potrebi začnejo opravljati preiskave v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, v katerih lahko sodeluje osebje Urada.
Where the Office has to hand, prior to an investigation, information which suggests that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, the Director General of the Office inform s the competent authorities of the Member States concerned and, without prejudice to the sectoral rules, those authorities shall ensure that appropriate action is taken and, where necessary, undertake investigations in accordance with national law, in which staff of the Office may take part.
Pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic obvestijo generalnega direktorja Urada o sprejetih ukrepih in svojih ugotovitvah na podlagi takih podatkov.“
The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall inform the Director‑General of the Office of the action taken and of their findings on the basis of such information.
Pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic morajo obvestiti generalnega direktorja Urada tudi o ukrepih, sprejetih na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je posredoval urad OLAF pred začetkom preiskave.
It is desirable to stipulate that the competent authorities of the Member States are also to inform the Director General of OLAF of measures taken in response to the forwarding of information from OLAF before the opening of an investigation.
Če se Urad odloči, da ne začne preiskave, obvesti Eurojust o posredovanju podatkov o domnevni goljufiji, korupciji ali drugem nezakonitem ravnanju iz člena 1, ki spadajo med težje oblike kriminala ter zadevajo vsaj dve državi članici, pristojnim organom držav članic.
When the Office decides not to open an investigation it shall inform Eurojust that it has forwarded to the competent authorities in the Member States elements of information giving grounds for suspecting the existence of fraud, an act of corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, in the form of serious crime involving two or more Member States.
Urad prav tako obvesti Eurojust takoj, ko je preiskava Urada v njegovi pristojnosti, v skladu z načini, določenimi v sporazumih o sodelovanju, ki sta jih sklenila.
Eurojust shall also be notified by the Office as soon as an Office investigation comes within its competence, in accordance with the procedures laid down in the cooperation agreements concluded between them.
Treba je predvideti sistematično izmenjajo informacij med uradom OLAF in Eurojustom vedno, ko nacionalni pristojni organ dobi od urada OLAF podatke o domnevni goljufiji, korupciji ali drugem ravnanju iz člena 1 te uredbe, ki spadajo med težje oblike kriminala ter zadevajo vsaj dve državi članici.
It is desirable to provide for the systematic exchange of information between OLAF and Eurojust whenever a competent national authority receives from OLAF information on suspicions of fraud, corruption any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, in the form of serious crime involving two or more Member States.
Ta ukrep, ki se nanaša na hude in mednacionalne primere goljufij, izboljšuje usklajenost med uradom OLAF in Eurojustom.
This measure will improve coordination between OLAF and Eurojust on cases of serious transnational fraud.
Člen 1 – točka 14 a (novo)
Article 1 - point 1 a
(1a) Doda se naslednji člen:
(1a) The following article is inserted:
„Člen 3 a
"Article 3a
Sodelovanje Urada z Eurojustom, Europolom in drugimi mednarodnimi organizacijami
Cooperation on the part of the Office with Eurojust, Europol and other international organisations
V okviru pooblastil, ki mu jih podeljuje ta uredba, Urad lahko sklepa sporazume o sodelovanju z Eurojustom in Europolom.
Pursuant to the powers and responsibilities conferred upon it under this Regulation, the Office may conclude cooperation agreements with Eurojust and Europol.
Cilj teh sporazumov je pojasniti različna pooblastila teh organov ter opredeliti njihovo sodelovanje v okviru prostora svobode, varnosti in pravice.
The aim of these agreements shall be to clarify the respective powers and responsibilities of these bodies and to define the cooperation between them within the framework of the area of freedom, of security and of justice.
Urad lahko sklepa sporazume o sodelovanju tudi z drugimi mednarodnimi organizacijami.“
The Office may also conclude cooperation agreements with other international organisations."
Člen 1 – točka 2 (-a) (novo)
Article 1 – point 2 -a (new)
Člen 4 – odstavek 1 – alinea 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
–a) Pododstavek 2 odstavka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(-a) Paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, is replaced by the following text:
„Te notranje preiskave se izvajajo po pravilih iz Pogodb, zlasti Protokola o posebnih pravicah in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti, in ob ustreznem upoštevanju Kadrovskih predpisov pod pogoji in v skladu s postopki, predvidenimi v tej uredbi in v sklepih, ki jih sprejme vsaka institucija, organ, urad; glede postopkovnih jamstev in zakonitih pravic vpletenih oseb veljajo enaka pravila kot pri zunanjih preiskavah. “
" These internal investigations shall be carried out subject to the rules of the Treaties, in particular the Protocol on privileges and immunities of the European Communities, and with due regard for the Staff Regulations under the conditions and in accordance with the procedures provided for in this Regulation and in decisions adopted by each institution, body, office and agency ; from the point of view of procedural guarantees and the legitimate rights of the persons concerned there must be no difference in treatment by comparison with external investigations. " .
Treba je poudariti, da morajo biti osebe, o katerih poteka preiskava urada OLAF, enako obravnavane (glede postopkovnih jamstev in zakonitih pravic) ne glede na to, ali gre za notranjo ali zunanjo preiskavo.
It is worth stressing that people who are under investigation by OLAF should be treated equally as regards procedural guarantees and legitimate rights, irrespective of whether the investigation is internal or external.
Člen 1 – točka 2 a
Article 1 – point 2 a
V skladu s postopki, opredeljenimi z Uredbo (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96, lahko Urad izvaja inšpekcije na kraju samem v prostorih gospodarskih subjektov, da bi si zagotovil dostop do podatkov o morebitnih nepravilnostih, povezanih z zadevo, ki je predmet notranje preiskave.
In accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, the Office may carry out on‑the‑spot inspections at the premises of economic operators in order to obtain access to information relevant to the matter under internal investigation.
V skladu s postopki, opredeljenimi z Uredbo (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96, lahko Urad izvaja inšpekcije na kraju samem v prostorih gospodarskih subjektov, ki so posredno ali neposredno vpleteni, da bi si zagotovil dostop do podatkov o morebitnih nepravilnostih, povezanih z zadevo, ki je predmet notranje preiskave.
In accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, the Office may carry out on‑the‑spot inspections at the premises of economic operators who are directly or indirectly concerned in order to obtain access to information relevant to the matter under internal investigation.
Glede na preiskovalne postopke iz te uredbe, ki povzemajo postopke iz uredbe (ES) št. 2185/96, je pri uredbi (ES) št. 1073/99 za gospodarske subjekte treba predvideti enako področje uporabe, kot velja za uredbo (ES) št. 2185/96, da bi se tako izboljšala učinkovitost preiskav Urada.
As the methods of investigation provided for by the Regulation in question coincide with those previously provided for by Regulation (EC) No 2185/96, it is desirable to define the same scope for Regulation (EC) No 1073/99 as for Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 as regards economic operators, in order to improve the effectiveness of OLAF's investigations.
Urad lahko začne preiskavo, ko obstajajo dovolj utemeljeni sumi, da so bila storjena dejanja goljufije ali korupcije ali druga nezakonita ravnanja iz člena 1.
The Office may open an investigation when sufficiently strong suspicions exist that acts of fraud or corruption or other illegal acts referred to in Article 1 have been committed.
Odločitev, ali začeti preiskavo ali ne, upošteva prednostne naloge preiskovalne politike ter program preiskovalnih dejavnosti Urada, določen v skladu s členoma 11a in 12(5).
The decision whether or not to open an investigation shall take account of the investigation policy priorities and the Office’s programme of investigative activities determined in accordance with Articles 11a and 12(5).