natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice zahtevajo, da v primeru, ko imata centralni in napajalni KNPVP različna depozitarja, ta depozitarja skleneta dogovor o izmenjavi podatkov in tako zagotovita, da oba izpolnjujeta svoje dolžnosti .
Member States shall require that, if the master UCITS and the feeder UCITS have different depositaries, these depositaries enter into an information-sharing agreement in order to ensure the fulfilment of the duties of both depositaries .
Države članice zahtevajo, da je v primeru, ko imata centralni in napajalni KNPVP različna depozitarja, družba za upravljanje centralnega KNPVP odgovorna za informiranje napajalnega KNPVP ali, kjer je primerno, družba za upravljanje napajalnega KNPVP, o morebitnih nepravilnostih, ki jih ugotovi v zvezi s centralnim KNPVP .
Member States shall require that, if the master UCITS and the feeder UCITS have different depositaries, the management company of the master UCITS is to be responsible for informing the feeder UCITS or, where applicable, the management company of the feeder UCITS about any irregularities it detects with regard to the master UCITS .
Dokler ta dogovor ne začne veljati, napajalni KNPVP ne vlaga v enote centralnega KNPVP.
The feeder UCITS shall not invest in units of the master UCITS until such agreement has become effective.
Napajalni KNPVP ali, kjer je primerno, družba za upravljanje napajalnega KNPVP, sta dolžna depozitarju napajalnega KNPVP sporočiti vse informacije o centralnem KNPVP, ki so potrebne za popolno izvajanje nalog depozitarja napajalnega UCITS.
The feeder UCITS or, where applicable, the management company of the feeder UCITS, shall be responsible for communicating to the depositary of the feeder UCITS any information about the master UCITS which is required for complete performance of the duties of the depositary of the feeder UCITS.
Komisija lahko sprejme izvedbene ukrepe, ki nadalje opredeljujejo:
The Commission may adopt implementing measures further specifying the following:
(a) podatke, ki morajo biti vključeni v dogovor iz odstavka 1(1) ;
(a) the particulars that need to be included in the agreement referred to in paragraph 1 subparagraph 1 ;
(a) podatke, ki morajo biti vključeni v informacije iz odstavkov 1 in 2 ;
(a) the particulars that need to be included in the information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 ;
(b) vrste nepravilnosti iz odstavka 2, za katere velja, da negativno vplivajo na napajalni KNPVP .
(b) the types of irregularities referred to in paragraph 2 which are deemed to have a negative impact on the feeder UCITS .
(b) vrste nepravilnosti iz odstavka 1 .
(b) the types of irregularities referred to in paragraph 1 .
Med depozitarji ni pogodbenega razmerja, zato mora direktiva temeljiti na pogodbenem razmerju med družbo za upravljanje in depozitarjem ter navajati, da ostaja družba za upravljanje odgovorna za prenos informacij, ker odgovornosti depozitarjev ostajajo, kot je sedaj opredeljeno na nacionalni ravni.
As there is no contractual relations between the depositaries, the Directive should be based on the contractual relationship between the management company and the depositary and should indicate that the management company remains responsible for transmission of information, whereas the depositaries’ responsibilities remain as defined nationally at the time being.
PRILOGA: MNENJE SVETOVALNE DELOVNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA, SVETA IN KOMISIJE
ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION
SVETOVALNA SKUPINA PRAVNIH SLUŽB Bruselj, 14/11/2008
GROUPE CONSULTATIF DES SERVICES JURIDIQUES Brussels, 14/11/2008
EVROPSKEMU PARLAMENTU
FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
SVETU IN KOMISIJI
THE COUNCIL THE COMMISSION
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP) KOM(2008) 458 končno z dne 16.7.2008 - 2008/0153 (COD)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) COM(2008) 458 final of 16.7.2008 - 2008/0153 (COD)
Ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematični rabi metode prenove za pravne akte, še posebej njegove 9. točke, se je svetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala 4. in 24. septembra ter 13. novembra 2008, da bi preučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 4 and 24 September and on 13 November 2008 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Na teh sestankih
At those meetings
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna različica obravnavanega besedila. je posvetovalna delovna skupina po preučitvi predloga pregled predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 85/611/EGS z dne 20. decembra 1985 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP) soglasno ugotovila, da
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Directive 85/611/EEC of 20 December 1985 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) resulted in the Consultative Working Party's establishing, by common accord, as follows.
1) bi morali biti naslednji deli besedila prenovljenega predloga osenčeni s sivo barvo za označitev bistvenih sprememb:
1) The following parts of text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes:
- celotno besedilo uvodne izjave 5 Direktive 85/611/EGS, predstavljeno med besedilom uvodnih izjav 4 in 5 v prenovljenem predlogu, ki je bilo že prečrtano z dvojno črto;
- the entire text of recital 5 of Directive 85/611/EEC, having been presented between the texts of recitals 4 and 5 in the recast proposal and having been already marked with double strikethrough;
- v uvodni izjavi 8, ki ustreza uvodni izjavi 5 Direktive 2001/1G7/ES, zaključno besedilo „v treh letih“ , ki je bilo že prečrtano z dvojno črto;
- in recital 8, which corresponds to recital 5 of Directive 2001/1G7/EC, the final wording "within three years", which has already been marked with double strikethrough;
- v členu 2(5) se sklicevanje na „člen 92 Direktive 2001/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta“ (besedilo drugega pododstavka člena 1a(10) Direktive 85/611/EGS sedaj glasi „Za namene te opredelitve se upoštevajo glasovalne pravice iz člena 7 Direktive 88/627/EGS(7)“; v preoblikovanem besedilu se je sklicevanje prilagodilo tako, da se glasi „člen 92 Direktive 2001/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta“; člen 92 Direktive 2001/34/ES se črta s členom 32(5) Direktive 2004/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
- in Article 2(5), the reference made to "Article 92 of Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council" (the wording of Article la(10), second subparagraph, of Directive 85/611/EEC currently reads "For the purpose of this definition, the voting rights referred to in Article 7 of Directive 88/627/EEC(7) shall be taken into account"; in the recast text that reference was adapted so as to read as a reference made to "Article 92 of Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and the Council"; Article 92 of Directive 2001/34/EC has been deleted by Article 32(5) of Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Pravna služba Evropskega parlamenta meni, da bi moralo biti besedilo „člena 92 Direktive 2001/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta“ prečrtano z dvojno črto;
The Legal Service of the European Parliament is of the opinion that the text "Article 92 of Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and the Council" should have been presented with double strikethrough);
- v prvem odstavku člena 21 besede „matične države članice KNPVP“ in besedilo „v kateri je registrirani sedež družbe za upravljanje“ (ki je bilo že prečrtano z dvojno črto).
- in Article 21, first paragraph, the words "UCITS home Member" as well as the wording "in which the management company's registered office is situated' (which has already been marked with double strikethrough).
2) V členu 6(1) je treba izraz „KNPVP“ med dvema puščicama za besedilom „matične države članice“ črtati.
2) In Article 6(1), the expression "UCITS" presented between adaptation arrows before the wording "home Member State " should be removed.
3) V členu 12(l)(b) je treba izraz „KNPVP“ med dvema puščicama za besedilom „država gostiteljica“ črtati.
3) In Article I2(l)(b), the expression "UCITS' presented between adaptation arrows before the wording "host Member State " should be removed.
4) V členu 97(5) se ponovno uvede obstoječe besedilo člena 50(6) Direktive 85/611/EGS, v malo prilagojeni obliki namesto prilagojenega besedila v preoblikovanem predlogu.
4) In Article 97(5), the existing wording of Article 50(6) of Directive 85/611/EEC should be reintroduced, in slightly adapted form, in the place of the adapted text that appears in the recast proposal.
Besedilo člena 97(5) se mora glasiti: "5.
The wording of Article 97(5) should read as follows: "5.
Odstavka 1 in 4 ne izključujeta izmenjave podatkov:
Paragraphs 1 and 4 shall not preclude the exchange of information:
(a) znotraj države članice med dvema ali več pristojnimi organi ali
(a) within a Member State , where there are two or more competent authorities; or
(b) znotraj države članice ali med državami članicami, med pristojnimi organi ter
(b) within a Member State or between Member States, between competent authorities; and
(i) organi z javno odgovornostjo za nadzor kreditnih institucij, investicijskih podjemov, zavarovalnic in drugih finančnih organizacij, in organi, odgovornimi za nadzor finančnih trgov;
(i) authorities with public responsibility for the supervision of credit institutions, investment undertakings, insurance undertakings arid other financial organisations and the authorities responsible for the supervision of financial markets;
(ii) subjekti, vključenimi v likvidacijo ali stečaj KNPVP in drugih podobnih postopkov, in podjetji, ki prispevajo k poslovni dejavnosti;
(ii) bodies involved in the liquidation or bankruptcy of UCITS and other similar procedures and of undertakings contributing towards their business activity;
(Hi) osebami, odgovornimi za izvajanje obveznih revizijskih pregledov izkazov zavarovalnic, kreditnih institucij, investicijskih podjetij in drugih finančnih institucij,
(Hi) persons responsible for carrying out statutory audits of the accounts of insurance undertakings, credit institutions, investment undertakings and other financial institutions,
pri opravljanju njihovih nadzornih funkcij ter pri razkritju informacij organom, ki upravljajo odškodninske sheme in so potrebne za izvajanje njihovih nalog.
in the performance of their supervisory functions, or the disclosure to bodies which administer compensation schemes of information necessary for the performance of their functions,
Za podatke, ki se izmenjajo v skladu s prvim pododstavkom, veljajo pogoji varovanja poklicne skrivnosti iz odstavka 1“.
Information exchanged pursuant to the first subparagraph shall be subject to the conditions of professional secrecy imposed in paragraph 1".
5) V korelacijski tabeli iz Priloge IV je treba navesti povezavo med Prilogo II Direktive 85/611 /EGS in Prilogo II preoblikovanega besedila.
5) In the correlation table contained in Annex IV, a correspondence should be indicated between Annex II of Directive 85/611 /EEC and Annex II of the recast text.
Posvetovalna skupina je zato lahko po pregledu predloga soglasno sklenila, da ne vsebuje bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v tem mnenju opredeljene kot take.
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such therein or in the present opinion.
o prihodnosti Sveta OZN za človekove pravice in o vlogi EU
on the development of the UN Human Rights Council, including the role of the EU
- ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Komisiji Združenih narodov za človekove pravice od leta 1996 dalje, zlasti resolucije z dne 16. marca 2006 o izidu pogajanj o Svetu za človekove pravice in 62. zasedanju Komisije Združenih narodov za človekove pravice
- having regard to its previous resolutions on the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) since 1996, in particular its resolution of 16 March 2006 on the outcome of the negotiations on the Human Rights Council and on the 62nd session of the UNCHR
409. , ter resolucij z dne 29. januarja 2004 o odnosih med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi narodi
409. , as well as those of 29 January 2004 on the relations between the European Union and the United Nations
79. , z dne 9. junija 2005 o reformi Združenih narodov
79. , of 9 June 2005 on the reform of the United Nations
549. , z dne 29. septembra 2005 o rezultatih svetovnega vrha Združenih narodov od 14. do 16. septembra 2005
549. , of 29 September 2005 on the outcome of the United Nations World Summit of 14-16 September 2005
582. , z dne 21. februarja 2008 o sedmem zasedanju sveta Združenih narodov za človekove pravice (UNHRC)
582. , of 21 February 2008 on the seventh session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC)
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0065 . in z dne 8. maja 2008 o letnem poročilu o človekovih pravicah v svetu za leto 2007 in politiki EU na tem področju,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0065 . and of 8 May 2008 on the Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2007 and the European Union's policy on the matter
- ob upoštevanju poročila generalnega sekretarja Združenih narodov iz leta 2005 z naslovom „V večji svobodi”, kasnejše resolucije Združenih narodov št. 60/1 o izidih svetovnega vrha 2005 in poročila generalnega sekretarja ZN z dne 7. marca 2006 z naslovom „Vlagati v Združene narode: za močnejšo organizacijo po vsem svetu”,
- having regard to the UN Secretary-General's 2005 report entitled “In Larger Freedom”, the subsequent Resolution 60/1 of the UN General Assembly on the 2005 World Summit Outcome and the UN Secretary-General's report of 7 March 2006 entitled “Investing in the United Nations: for a stronger Organization worldwide”,
- ob upoštevanju resolucije generalne skupščine Združenih narodov A/RES/60/251 o ustanovitvi UNHRC,
- having regard to United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/60/251 establishing the UNHRC,
- ob upoštevanju izjave predsedstva EU v imenu Evropske unije z dne 16. marca 2006 o ustanovitvi UNHRC,
- having regard to the Declaration by the EU Presidency on behalf of the European Union of 16 March 2006 on the establishment of the UNHRC,
- ob upoštevanju predhodnih rednih in izrednih zasedanj UNHRC,
- having regard to the previous regular and special sessions of the UNHRC,
- ob upoštevanju rezultatov dela delovnih skupin UNHRC glede postopka pritožbe, splošnega rednega pregleda, prihodnjega sistema strokovnega svetovanja, programa, letnega delovnega programa, metod dela, poslovnika in pregleda posebnih postopkov,
- having regard to the outcome of the work of the UNHRC's working groups on the complaints procedure, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), the future system of expert advice, the agenda, the annual programme of work, working methods, the rules of procedure and the review of Special Procedures,
- ob upoštevanju rezultatov tretjih volitev držav članic v UNHRC, ki so potekale v okviru Generalne skupščine Združenih narodov 21. maja 2008,
- having regard to the results of the third election of member states to the UNHRC held at the UN General Assembly on 21 May 2008,
- ob upoštevanju rezultatov volitev za predsedstvo UNHRC, ki so potekale 19. junija 2008,
- having regard to the results of the elections for the Presidency of the UNHRC held on 19 June 2008,
- ob upoštevanju prvega in drugega zasedanja v okviru splošnega rednega pregleda, ki je potekalo od 7. do 18. aprila 2008 in od 5. do16. maja 2008,
- having regard to the first and second sessions of the UPR held from 7 to 18 April 2008 and from 5 to 16 May 2008,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0498/2008 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0498/2008 ),
A. ker je spoštovanje, spodbujanje in varstvo univerzalnosti človekovih pravic del pravnega reda Evropske unije ter eno od temeljnih načel EU,
A. whereas respect for, and the promotion and safeguarding of, the universality of human rights is part of the European Union’s legal acquis and one of the fundamental principles of the EU,
B. ker EU namenja človekovim pravicam in demokraciji osrednje mesto v svojih zunanjih odnosih in ker njena zunanja politika temelji na močni in nedvoumni podpori učinkovitemu multilateralizmu, kot je navedeno v Ustanovni listini Združenih narodov,
B. whereas the EU places human rights and democracy at the heart of its external relations, and whereas its foreign policy is based on strong and unequivocal support for effective multilateralism, as embodied in the UN Charter,
C. ker so Združeni narodi in UNHRC med najprimernejšimi organizacijami za izčrpno obravnavo vprašanj v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami in humanitarnih izzivov,
C. whereas the United Nations and the UNHRC constitute one of the most appropriate organisations to deal comprehensively with human rights issues and humanitarian challenges,
D. ker je bila odločitev o ustanovitvi UNHRC na splošno sprejeta kot pobuda za odpravo pomanjkljivosti Komisije Združenih narodov za človekove pravice in okrepitev vloge človekovih pravic v medvladnih razpravah z ustanovitvijo polstalnega organa,
D. whereas the decision on establishment of the UNHRC has been generally welcomed as an initiative to rectify the shortcomings of the UNCHR and enhance the place of human rights within intergovernmental debates by setting up a quasi-standing body,
E. ker si je UNHRC zastavil ambiciozen program za prvi dve leti, ki je vključeval pregled njegovih postopkov in delovnih metod, zlasti razvoj in izvajanje splošnega rednega pregleda, v zvezi s katerim sta doslej potekali dve zasedanji, v okviru katerih je bilo pregledanih 32 držav, od tega sedem držav članic, in pregled posebnih postopkov,
E. whereas the UNHRC set itself an ambitious programme for its first two years, which included the review of its procedures and working methods, in particular the development and implementation of the UPR of which two sessions have been held so far, reviewing 32 States, of which seven are EU Member States , and the review of Special Procedures,
F. ker je EU odločno podpirala in zagovarjala ustanovitev UNHRC ter ker so se EU in njene države članice zavezale in odločile imeti aktivno in vidno vlogo pri oblikovanju in podpori učinkovitega organa, ki obravnava aktualne izzive na področju človekovih pravic,
F. whereas the EU has been a strong supporter and advocate of the establishment of the UNHRC, and whereas the EU and its Member States have committed and dedicated themselves to playing an active and visible role with a view to creating and supporting an effective body addressing contemporary human rights challenges,
G. ker je EU odločno zagovarjala uvedbo okrepljene večine in meril za članstvo pri volitvah v UNHRC, kar so predlogi, ki niso bili sprejeti, ter določitev postopkov za spremljanje dejanskega izvajanja volilnih obljub držav članic ZN,
G. whereas the EU strongly supported the establishment of reinforced majority and membership criteria for election to the UNHRC, which proposals have not been retained, and of procedures for the monitoring of the actual implementation of the UN member states’ election pledges,
H. ker se je pokazalo, da države članice skladneje sodelujejo v UNHRC kot v Komisiji Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, čeprav omejitve glede enotnosti EU še vedno obstajajo, zlasti zaradi nasprotujočih nacionalnih interesov in vztrajne želje držav članic, da bi pri ZN delovale neodvisno,
H. whereas, whilst limits to the EU's unity persist, due in particular to conflicting national interests and a persistent desire on the part of Member States to act independently at the UN, there is evidence that they act more cohesively in the UNHRC than they did in the UNCHR,
I. ker dejstvo, da so države članice EU v UNHRC v številčni manjšini, resno ovira sposobnost EU, da vpliva na dnevni red UNHRC, ter predstavlja resen izziv za vključevanje stališč EU v delo UNHRC;
I. whereas the fact that EU Member States constitute a numerical minority within the UNHRC seriously obstructs the EU' s ability to influence the agenda of the UNHRC and poses a serious challenge to the integration of EU positions in the work of the UNHRC;
J. ker je obžalovanja vredna odsotnost Združenih držav iz UNHRC povzročila potrebo po tem, da EU okrepi svojo vlogo vodilne sile demokratičnih držav na področju človekovih pravic,
J. whereas the regrettable absence of the United States from the UNHRC has led to the need for the EU to strengthen its role as a leading force amongst democratic countries on human rights issues,
K. ker Parlament pozorno spremlja dogajanje v UNHRC z rednim pošiljanjem delegacij na njegova zasedanja in s povabili posebnim poročevalcem in neodvisnim strokovnjakom, da prispevajo k delu Parlamenta na področju človekovih pravic;
K. whereas Parliament closely follows developments in the UNHRC, by sending regular delegations to its sessions and by inviting Special Rapporteurs and independent experts to contribute to its work on human rights,
L. ker bodo postopki in mehanizmi UNHRC leta 2011 pregledani, kot je določeno v resoluciji generalne skupščine št. 60/251,
L. whereas the UNHRC's procedures and mechanisms are to be reviewed in 2011, as provided for by Resolution 60/251 of the General Assembly,
Splošna ocena prvih dveh let UNHRC
Overall assessment of the UNHRC’s first two years
4. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je postopek za volitve v UNHRC omogočil, da se iz UNHRC izključijo največji kršitelji človekovih pravic, kot sta Iran in Belorusija, obžaluje pa, da vse geografske skupine niso izvedle pravih postopkov za volitve v zvezi s pristopom k UNHRC; obžaluje, da je sistem prostovoljnega jamstva imel zelo raznolike in neustrezne rezultate in je vladam omogočal, da so se izogibale svojim mednarodnim obvezam na področju človekovih pravic; v zvezi s tem je močno zaskrbljen zaradi instrumentalne rabe tako imenovanih obveznosti v nekaterih državah članicah in zato ponovno potrjuje, da bi moralo polno sodelovanje s posebnimi postopki ostati najmanjši kriterij za pristop k UNHRC;
Welcomes the fact that the procedure for elections to the UNHRC has made it possible to exclude from the UNHRC major human rights violators such as Iran and Belarus; regrets, nevertheless, that not all geographic groups have organised genuine procedures for elections concerning accession to the UNHRC; regrets that the system of voluntary pledges has had very disparate and inadequate results, enabling governments to shy away from their international human rights obligations; in this regard, is deeply concerned by the instrumental use of so-called commitments by some members and therefore reaffirms that full cooperation with Special Procedures should remain the bottom-line criterion for acceding to the UNHRC;