natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vloga zadeva 613 presežnih delavcev (za vse je predvidena pomoč) v devetmesečnem referenčnem obdobju od 1. maja 2009 do 31. januarja 2010 v dveh podjetjih, ki delujeta v oddelku 46 NACE (revizija 2) (trgovina na debelo, razen z motornimi vozili) v nizozemski regiji Severna Holandija na ravni NUTS II.
It concerns 613 redundancies (all targeted for assistance) in two enterprises operating in the NACE Revision 2 Division 46 (Wholesale trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles) in the NUTS II region of Noord Holland in the Netherlands, during the nine-month reference period from 1 May 2009 to 31 January 2010.
Ta vloga (primer EGF/2010/012 NL/Severna Holandija, IKT) je bila predložena Komisiji 8. aprila 2010 in je bila do 5. avgusta 2010 dopolnjena z dodatnimi informacijami.
The application, case EGF/2010/012 NL/Noord Holland ICT was submitted to the Commission on 8 April 2010 and supplemented by additional information up to 5 August 2010.
Temelji na merilih za pomoč iz člena 2(b) uredbe ESPG, v skladu s katero mora biti odpuščenih vsaj 500 presežnih delavcev v obdobju devetih mesecev v podjetjih, ki delujejo v istem razdelku NACE (revizija 2) v eni regiji ali dveh sosednjih regijah na ravni NUTS II v državi članici, predložena pa je bila v roku 10 tednov (člen 5 te uredbe).
It was based on the intervention criterion of Art. 2 (b) of the EGF Regulation, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a nine-month period in enterprises operating in the same NACE Revision 2 Division in one region or two contiguous regions at NUTS II level in a Member State and was submitted within the deadline of 10 weeks (Art. 5 of the Regulation).
V skladu z oceno Komisije vloga izpolnjuje merila za upravičenost do pomoči, določene v uredbi o ESPG, zato se priporoča proračunskemu organu, da jo odobri.
In accordance with Commission's assessment, the application fulfils the eligibility criteria set up by the EGF Regulation and recommends to the Budget Authority to approve the applications.
Za uporabo sredstev sklada je Komisija proračunskemu organu predložila vlogo za prerazporeditev (DEC 48/2010) skupnega zneska 2.557.135 EUR iz rezerve za ESPG (40 02 43) za prevzem obveznosti ter iz proračunske vrstice „Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije – program za podjetništvo in inovacije“ (01 04 04) za plačila v proračunske vrstice ESPG (04 05 01).
In order to mobilise the Fund, the Commission has submitted to the Budget Authority a transfer request (DEC 48/2010) for a global amount of EUR 2.557.135 from the EGF reserve (40 02 43) in commitments and from the budget line "Competitiveness and innovation Framework Programme - Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme" (01 04 04) in payments to the EGF budget lines (04 05 01).
Poročevalka z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da Komisija še naprej išče vire sredstev za plačila, ki so alternativa neporabljenim sredstvom Evropskega socialnega sklada, kar je Evropski parlament večkrat zahteval.
The Rapporteur is pleased to observe that the Commission keeps identifying alternative sources of payment appropriations to unused ESF Funds, in accordance with the frequent requests in the past from the European Parliament.
Meni pa, da nadomestne rešitve, ki so bile izbrane v zadnjih primerih (proračunska vrstica za podporo podjetništvu in inovacijam), niso zadovoljive glede na resne pomanjkljivosti, s katerimi se sooča Komisija pri izvajanju programov za konkurenčnost in inovacije.
However, she considers that the alternatives chosen in the last cases (budgets line dedicated to the support of entrepreneurship and innovation) are not satisfactory given the severe shortcomings that the Commission encounters when implementing the programmes on competitiveness and innovation.
V letu 2010 je proračunski organ že odobril 24 vlog za uporabo sredstev iz sklada in prerazporeditev za tehnično pomoč v skupnem znesku 75.935.163 EUR, pri čemer je, če ta znesek prištejemo dodatnemu znesku 8.728.978 EUR za druge vloge (vključno s to), o katerih se še razpravlja, do konca leta 2010 ostalo na voljo še 415.335.859 EUR.
In 2010, the Budget Authority has already approved twenty-four proposals for the mobilisation of the Fund and a transfer for the Technical assistance, for a total amount of EUR 75.935.163, which added to the additional amount of EUR 8.728.978 related to the other proposals under discussion (including the present one), leaves an amount of EUR 415.335.859 available until the end of 2010.
DEC 48/2010 of 23. november 2010 , da se v proračun za leto 2010 vnesejo posebna sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila v skladu z zahtevami točke 28 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006.
DEC 48/2010 of 23 November 2010 in order to enter specific commitment and payment appropriations in the 2010 budget, as required in Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
Po opravljeni oceni bo odbor EMPL v zvezi z uporabo sredstev iz sklada izrazil svoje stališče, ki bo kot pismo priloženo temu poročilu.
Following its evaluation, the EMPL committee of the European Parliament will give its view on the mobilisation of the Fund, which will be attached as letter to the present report.
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve (EMPL) ter njegova delovna skupina za ESPG sta preučila uporabo sredstev ESPG za primer ESPG/2010/012 NL/Severna Holandija IKT in sprejela naslednje mnenje.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL) as well as its Working Group on the EGF examined the mobilisation of the EGF for the case EGF/2010/012 NL/Noord Holland ICT and adopted the following opinion.
Odbor EMPL ima sicer nekaj pripomb, ki pa ne ogrožajo prerazporeditve sredstev za plačila.
In this respect, the EMPL committee presents some remarks without, however, putting into question the transfer of the payments .
A) ker vloga temelji na členu 2b uredbe o ESPG in zajema 613 presežnih delavcev, ki so službo izgubili v devetmesečnem referenčnem obdobju med 1. majem 2009 in 31. januarjem 2010 v dveh podjetjih, ki se ukvarjata s trgovino na debelo, razen z motornimi vozili, kot je opredeljeno v oddelku 46 NACE (revizija 2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1893/2006,
A) Whereas this application is based on Article 2b of the EGF regulation and includes 613 redundancies that occurred during the reference period of 9 months between 1 May 2009 and 31 January 2010 in 2 firms involved in wholesale trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles according to NACE Revision 2 Division 46 of regulation (EC) No 1893/2006;
B) ker je ta sektor, zlasti podjetja, ki so se ukvarjala z razvojem in prodajo strojne opreme, finančna in gospodarska kriza hudo prizadela, kar je povzročilo ogromen padec prometa dveh podjetij, ki sta prosili za pomoč, in sicer za 25 % v podjetju Getronics ter za 17 % v enoti podjetja HP za prodajo računalnikov in za 19 % v enoti istega podjetja za prodajo tiskalnikov; razlog za ta padec je nenadno in nepredvideno zmanjšanje proračunov za naložbe v opremo IKT;
B) Whereas this sector, in particular enterprises involved in the development and sales of hardware, was negatively effected by the financial and economic crisis resulting in a significant drop of the turnover of the two enterprises concerned, which means 25% for Getronics and 17% for the PC division of HP and 19% for its printing division due to a sudden and unforeseen reduction in investment budgets related to ICT goods;
C) ker so nizozemske oblasti zatrdile, da je trg opreme IKT do sredine leta 2008 deloval razmeroma uspešno, kar je obetalo rast obema omenjenima podjetjema in njunim strankam, kljub strukturnim spremembam na svetovnem trgu IKT, zlasti selitvi proizvodnje na Kitajsko in v Indijo, zaradi česar je tržni delež držav OECD v celotni trgovini z opremo IKT padel z 88 % v letu 1996 na 56 % v letu 2006;
C) Whereas the Dutch authorities argue that until mid-2008 the ICT market performed relatively well, with growth prospects both for ICT enterprises and their customer markets despite the structural changes in the global ICT market, in particular a delocalisation of production to China and India resulting in a decrease of the market share of OECD countries in total ICT trade from 88 % in 1996 to 56 % in 2006;
D) ker so bili presežni delavci odpuščeni v pokrajini Severna Holandija, regiji z veliko koncentracijo podjetij za IKT, zaradi česar se bo položaj na trgu dela, ki se je že tako poslabšal zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize, še toliko bolj zaostril; ker je v uvodni izjavi 4 uredbe ESPG navedeno, da je treba „zagotoviti, da se finančni prispevek iz ESPG osredotoči na delavce iz najbolj prizadetih regij in gospodarskih sektorjev Skupnosti“,
D) Whereas the redundancies occurred in the province of Noord-Holland, a region with a high concentration of ICT enterprises and where these redundancies will aggravate the employment situation which deteriorated already as a consequence of the global financial and economic crisis; whereas the EGF regulation states in recital 4 that it should be "ensured that the financial contribution from the EGF is concentrated on workers in the most seriously affected regions and economic sectors of the Community";
E) ker je Nizozemska potrdila, da sta obe podjetji spoštovali svoje obveznosti glede posvetovanja s socialnimi partnerji o socialnem načrtu v primerih, ko je odpuščenih več kot 30 presežnih delavcev, kar natančneje pomeni, da je CA-ICT, v katerem so predstavniki delodajalcev in zaposlenih, odigral pomembno vlogo pri pripravi ukrepov;
E) Whereas the Netherlands specified that both enterprises complied with the obligation to consult the social partners on a social plan in cases of collective redundancies exceeding 30 dismissals, meaning, more in detail, that CA-ICT, which is composed of representatives of employers and employees, played an important role in the preparation of the measures;
F) ker so nizozemske oblasti navedle, da bi bili odpuščeni delavci lahko upravičeni do udeležbe v dveh posebnih projektih Evropskega socialnega sklada za delavce v sektorju IKT, in ker so potrdile, da so vzpostavile vse potrebne mehanizme, da bi preprečile tveganje dvojnega financiranja iz ESPG in drugih finančnih instrumentov EU;
F) Whereas the Dutch authorities specified that the dismissed workers might qualify for two specific ESF projects for workers in the ICT sector and wheras they confirm that the necessary mechanisms are in place to prevent any risk of double funding from the EGF and other EU financial instruments;
G) ker Nizozemska prosi za pomoč za vse presežne delavce, tudi tiste, ki so starejši od 65 let,
G) Whereas the Netherlands ask for support for all workers made redundant, including those aged over 65 years old;
H) ker je 64,9 % presežnih delavcev moških;
H) Whereas 64,9% of the redundant workers are male;
I) ker je 79,9 % delavcev strokovnjakov in tehnikov;
I) Whereas 79,9% of the workers are professionals or technicians;
J) ker ima 24 delavcev (3,9 %) dolgotrajne zdravstvene težave ali so invalidi;
J) Whereas 24 workers (3,9%) of the workers have a longstanding health problem or disability;
zato Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za proračun kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije v zvezi z vlogo Nizozemske vključi naslednje pobude:
Therefore, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to integrate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution concerning the Dutch application:
5. obžaluje, da v vlogi ni navedeno, ali so bili delavcem z dolgotrajnimi zdravstvenimi problemi in starejšim od 65 let ponujeni posebni ukrepi;
Regrets that the application does not indicate if any special measures were offered to the workers with longstanding health problems and those over 65 years old;
o pobudi za direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o evropski odredbi o zaščiti
on the draft directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Protection Order
Odbor za pravice žensk in politiko enakih možnosti
Committee on Women ’ s Rights and Gender Equality
Poročevalci: Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Carmen Romero López
Rapporteurs: Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Carmen Romero López
(Člen 51 - skupne seje odborov)
(Rule 51 – Joint committee meetings)
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA..........................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION..........................................5
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI ..........................................36
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS..................38
– ob upoštevanju pobude skupine držav članic (00002/2010),
– having regard to the initiative emanating from a group of Member States (00002/2010),
– ob upoštevanju člena 76(b) in točke (d) drugega pododstavka člena 82(1) in člena 289(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Svet predložil Parlamentu osnutek akta ( C7-0006/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 76(b) and point (d) of the second subparagraph of Article 82(1) and Article 289(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council submitted the draft act to Parliament ( C7-0006/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in (15) Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and (15) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
– ob upoštevanju obrazloženega mnenja o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki ga v okviru protokola št. 2 predloži nacionalni parlament in v katerem trdi, da se osnutek zakonodajnega akta ne sklada z načelom subsidiarnosti,
– having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, in the framework of the Protocol (No 2) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by a national parliament asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
– ob upoštevanju členov 37, 44 in 55 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 37, 44 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju skupne razprave Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov v skladu s členom 51 poslovnika,
– having regard to the joint deliberations of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality pursuant to Rule 51 of the Rules of Procedure
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A7‑0354/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A7‑0354/2010 ),
* Predlog spremembe: krepki ležeči tisk označuje novo ali spremenjeno besedilo, simbol ▌pa tiste dele besedila, ki so bili črtani. *
* Amendments: new or amended text is highlighted in bold italics; deletions are indicated by the symbol ▌. *
[DIREKTIVA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA
[DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
o evropski odredbi o zaščiti
on the European Protection Order
EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE STA -
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 82(1) (a) in (d) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 82(1) ( a) and (d) thereof,
ob upoštevanju pobude Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Bolgarije, Republike Estonije, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Republike Italije, Republike Madžarske, Republike Poljske, Republike Portugalske, Romunije, Republike Finske in Kraljevine Švedske,
Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden,
ob upoštevanju rednega zakonodajnega postopka,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,
(1) Evropska unija si je postavila za cilj vzdrževanje in razvijanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
(1) The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
(2) V členu 82(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je določeno, da pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah v Uniji temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in sodnih odločb.
(2) Article 82(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides that judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the Union shall be based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions.
(3) V skladu s stockholmskim programom, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju 10 in 11. decembra 2009, bi lahko bilo vzajemno priznavanje razširjeno na vse vrste sodb in sodnih odločb, ki so lahko, odvisno od pravnega sistema, kazenske ali upravne.
(3) According to the Stockholm programme, adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 10 and 11 December 2009, mutual recognition could extend to all types of judgments and decisions of a judicial nature, which may, depending on the legal system, be either criminal or administrative.
Komisija in države članice so tudi pozvane, naj preučijo, kako bi lahko izboljšale zakonodajo in praktične podporne ukrepe za zaščito žrtev.
It also calls on the Commission and the Member States to examine how to improve legislation and practical support measures for the protection of victims.
V programu je tudi izpostavljeno, da se lahko žrtvam kaznivih dejanj ponudijo posebni zaščitni ukrepi, ki bi morali veljati v vsej Uniji.
The programme also points out that victims of crime can be offered special protection measures which should be effective within the Union.
Ta direktiva bo del skladnega in celovitega sklopa ukrepov v zvezi s pravicami žrtev.
This Directive will form part of a coherent and comprehensive set of measures on victims’ rights.
V resoluciji z dne 10. februarja 2010 o enakosti žensk in moških v Evropski uniji – 2009 pa je Evropski parlament podprl predloge za uvedbo evropske odredbe o zaščiti žrtev.
The resolution of the European Parliament of 10 February 2010 on equality between women and men in the European Union – 2009 endorses the proposal to introduce the European protection order for victims.
(5) V skupnem območju pravice brez notranjih meja je treba zagotoviti, da se zaščita fizične osebe, zagotovljena v eni državi članici, ohrani in nadaljuje v kateri koli drugi državi članici, v katero se oseba preseli oziroma se je preselila.
(5) In a common area of justice without internal borders, it is necessary to ensure that the protection provided to a natural person in one Member State is maintained and continued in any other Member State to which the person moves or has moved.
Treba bi bilo tudi zagotoviti, da državljani Unije zaradi legitimnega uveljavljanja svoje pravice do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic v skladu s členom 3(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členom 21 PDEU ne bi izgubili zaščite .
It should also be ensured that the legitimate exercise by citizens of the Union of their right to move and reside freely within the territory of Member States, in accordance with Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 21 of the TFEU, does not result in a loss of their protection .
(6) Za dosego teh ciljev bi morala biti v tej direktivi določena pravila, s katerimi se lahko zaščita, ki izhaja iz določenih zaščitnih ukrepov , sprejetih v skladu z zakonodajo ene države članice ("države izdajateljice"), razširi na drugo državo članico, v kateri se zaščitena oseba odloči prebivati ali zadrževati ("država izvršiteljica").
(6) In order to attain these objectives, this Directive should set out rules whereby the protection stemming from certain protection measures adopted according to the law of one Member State ("the issuing State") can be extended to another Member State in which the protected person decides to reside or stay ("the executing State ”)▌.
(6a) V tej direktivi so upoštevane različne pravne tradicije držav članic pa tudi dejstvo, da se lahko učinkovita zaščita zagotovi tudi z odredbo o zaščiti, ki jo izda organ, ki ni kazensko sodišče.
(6a) This Directive considers the different legal traditions of the Member States as well as the fact that effective protection can be provided by means of protection orders taken by an authority other than a criminal court.
Ta direktiva ne predpisuje sprememb nacionalnih sistemov za sprejemanje zaščitnih ukrepov.
This Directive does not establish obligations to modify national systems for adopting protection measures.
(6b) Ta direktiva se uporablja za zaščitne ukrepe, katerih namen je zaščita osebe pred kaznivim dejanjem druge osebe, ki lahko na kakršen koli način ogrozi njeno življenje, telesno in duševno celovitost ali spolno nedotakljivost, npr. s preprečevanjem vseh oblik nadlegovanja, ter njeno dostojanstvo in osebno svobodo, npr. s preprečevanjem ugrabitev, zalezovanja in drugih oblik posredne prisile, pa tudi preprečevanje novih kaznivih dejanj oziroma zmanjšanje posledic prejšnjih kaznivih dejanj.
(6b) This Directive applies to protection measures which aim at protecting a person against a criminal act of another person which may, in any way, endanger his life, physical, psychological and sexual integrity, e.g. by preventing any form of harassment, as well as his dignity or personal liberty, e.g. by preventing abductions, stalking and other forms of indirect coercion, and aiming at avoiding new acts of crime or at reducing the consequences of previous acts of crime.
Te osebne pravice zaščitene osebe ustrezajo temeljnim vrednotam, ki se priznavajo in podpirajo v vseh državah članicah.
These personal rights of the protected person correspond to fundamental values recognised and upheld in all Member States.
Treba je poudariti, da se direktiva nanaša na zaščitne ukrepe, ki poskušajo varovati vse žrtve in ne le žrtve spolnega nasilja, ob upoštevanju posebnosti vsake vrste kaznivega dejanja.
It is important to underline that this Directive applies to protection measures which aim at protecting all victims and not only the victims of gender violence, taking into account the specificities of each type of crime concerned.
(6c) Ta direktiva se uporablja za zaščitne ukrepe, neodvisno od narave – kazenske, civilne ali upravne – sodnega ali enakovrednega organa, ki sprejme zadevno odločbo bodisi v okviru kazenskih postopkov ali v okviru vseh drugih postopkov v zvezi z dejanjem, ki je bilo ali bi lahko bilo predmet postopkov pred sodiščem, pristojnim zlasti za kazenske zadeve.
(6c) This Directive applies to protection measures, independently from the nature - criminal, civil or administrative - of the judicial or equivalent authority that adopts the decision concerned, be it in the context of criminal proceedings or in the context of any other proceedings with regard to an act which has been or could have been the object of proceedings by a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters.
(6d) Direktiva je namenjena uporabi zaščitnih ukrepov v korist žrtev ali morebitnih žrtev kaznivih dejanj in se ne bi smela uporabljati za ukrepe, izdane z namenom zaščite prič.
(6d) This Directive is intended to apply to protection measures issued in favour of victims, or possible victims, of crimes; it should not apply to measures issued with a view to witness protection.
(6e) Če je zaščitni ukrep, kot je opredeljen v tej direktivi, izdan za zaščito sorodnika glavne zaščitene osebe, se lahko za evropsko odredbo o zaščiti zaprosi in se jo izda tudi za sorodnika, v skladu s pogoji iz te direktive.
(6e) If a protection measure, as defined in this Directive, is issued for the protection of a relative of the main protected person, an EPO may also be requested by and issued with regard to this relative, subject to the conditions laid out in this Directive.