natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tomczak je Parlamentu predložil pravno mnenje, ki vsebuje analizo očitnega protislovja med poljsko ustavo in takrat veljavno različico akta ter sklep, da bi moralo javno sodišče razsoditi o tem, ali so bili ukrepi Sejma in javnega tožilca napačni.
Mr Tomczak has provided the Parliament with a legal opinion that analyses the matter of this apparent contradiction between the Polish Constitution and that Act at the time and concludes that a public court would need to deliver a ruling whether the actions of the Sejm and the Public Prosecutor were fault.
Opozarja tudi, da je Wojciech Baszczyński sodniku, ki zadevo obravnava, naročil. naj nadaljuje s sojenjem kljub odsotnosti obtoženega, kar je dokaz pristranskosti pri izvajanju postopka.
He also points to an instruction issued by Wojciech Baszczyński to the judge presiding in the case to proceed with the trial even in the absence of the accused as an evidence of bias in the conduct of the proceedings.
Glede na predložene dokumente je sodišče njegovo zahtevo po kopiji celotne dokumentacije uradno zavrnilo, ker ni natančno opredelil, katere dokumente je zahteval.
According to the documents provided, his request for copies of the complete file was rejected by the Court on formal grounds, after Mr Tomczak had failed to specify precisely what documents he requested.
Razsodba v zadevi o odgovornosti uradnih predstavnikov Skupnosti glede davkov na premoženje je jasno opredelila, da kršitev določil PPI predstavlja kršitev obveznosti iz pogodb (sodba z dne 24. februarja 1988 v zadevi 260/86 Komisija proti Belgiji [1988] ECR 966).
The judgment in a case concerning the liability of Community officials for property tax made clear that a breach of the provisions of the PPI represented a breach of the obligations arising out of the Treaties (judgment of 24 February 1988 in Case 260/86 Commission v. Belgium [1988] ECR 966).
Prosto gibanje članov Evropskega parlamenta do kraja zasedanja Evropskega parlamenta ali nazaj se ne sme upravno ali kako drugače omejevati.
No administrative or other restriction shall be imposed on the free movement of Members of the European Parliament travelling to or from the place of meeting of the European Parliament.
Člani Evropskega parlamenta uživajo pri carinskem in deviznem nadzoru:
Members of the European Parliament shall, in respect of customs and exchange control, be accorded:
Ta zaščita sega onkraj trajanja mandata, vendar vedno v obsegu, ki ga omejuje natančna opredelitev v tem členu.
This protection extends beyond the duration of the mandate but always in a scope restricted by the clear language of the Article.
Zaščitena so mnenja in glasovi poslancev v Parlamentu, tudi če fizično niso navzoči v prostorih Parlamenta, a v vsakem primeru le, kadar izrecno nastopajo kot njegovi poslanci.
What is protected is Member's opinions or votes in Parliament or even when they are not physically within the premises of the House, but always when they are acting entirely as parliamentarians.
Tomczak junija 1999 ni bil poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, zato se člen 9 v tem primeru ne uporabi.
Mr Tomczak was not a Member of the European Parliament in June 1999, and Article 9 is therefore not applicable to this case.
3) Člen 10 določa, da med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi člani : a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane članom parlamenta te države...
3) Article 10 declares that [ d ] uring the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy: a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament... .
Obseg poslanske imunitete na Poljskem je zelo podoben tistemu, ki ga določa PPI.
The scope of the parliamentary immunity in Poland is very similar to that of the immunity provided for in the PPI.
Glede teh dejavnosti lahko poslanec odgovarja le pred Sejmom, v primeru pa, da je kršil pravice tretjih oseb, se lahko proti njemu uvede sodni postopek le s privolitvijo Sejma.
Regarding such activities, a Deputy can only be held liable before the Sejm and, in a case where he has infringed the rights of third parties, he may only be proceeded against before a court with the consent of the Sejm.
Od dneva razglasitve izida volitev do dneva izteka njegovega mandata poslanec ne more biti kazensko odgovoren brez privolitve Sejma.
From the day of announcement of the results of the elections until the day of the expiry of his mandate, a Deputy shall not be subjected to criminal liability without the consent of the Sejm.
Poslancu se ne sme vzeti prostosti ali ga aretirati brez privolitve Sejma, razen v primeru dokazanega kaznivega dejanja (in flagrante delicto), ko je odvzem prostosti nujen za zagotovitev ustreznega poteka postopka.
A Deputy shall be neither detained nor arrested without the consent of the Sejm, except for cases in flagrante delicto and in which his detention is necessary for securing the proper course of proceedings.
O vsakem takem odvzemu prostosti je treba takoj obvestiti predsednika Sejma, ki lahko odredi takojšnjo izpustitev poslanca.
Any such detention shall be immediately communicated to the Marshal of the Sejm, who may order an immediate release of the Deputy.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjih navedb bi se morala zahteva poslanca Tomczaka obravnavati kot prošnja Evropskemu parlamentu, naj sprejme sklep, da zaprosi za začasno prekinitev postopka proti njemu, kot to omogoča člen 105(3) poljske ustave.
In view of the above, Mr Tomczak's request should be treated as a request for a decision of the European Parliament to ask for suspension of the proceedings against him, as is possible under Art. 105(3) of the Polish Constitution.
Evropski parlament ima torej pravico, da zaščiti formalno imuniteto poslanca Tomczaka ali da je ne zaščiti.
The European Parliament has thus the right to defend or not to defend the formal immunity of Mr Tomczak.
Poleg tega pa, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je poslanska imuniteta ena izmed pravic Parlamenta, je treba o tej pravici dokončno odločiti, pa čeprav je zadevni poslanec kasneje prosil, da Parlament razveljavi postopek.
Moreover, considering that parliamentary immunity constitutes part of the prerogatives of the Parliament, this right should be expressed in a final decision, even if the Member concerned asked the Parliament to cancel the procedure at a later date.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso bi se Evropski parlament lahko odločil, da zaščiti imuniteto enega svojih poslancev, če bi obstajal sum, da je namen pregona oškodovanje poslančevega političnega delovanja ( fumus persecutionis ).
Following its established practice, the European Parliament could decide to defend the immunity of one of its Members if a suspicion existed that the prosecution was based on an intention to prejudice the Member's political activities ( fumus persecutionis) .
Tomczaka, zlasti o uporabi domnevno žaljivega jezika proti policistom, bi moralo objektivno rešiti okrožno sodišče v kraju Ostrów Wielkopolski (vedno obstaja možnost pritožbe).
All the procedural and substantive questions raised in connection with Mr Tomczak's case, and especially the question of the alleged insulting language used against the police officers, should be resolved objectively by the District Court in Ostrów Wielkopolski (there always being the possibility of appeal).
o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti – Boj proti goljufijam – Letno poročilo 2005–2006
on Protection of the Communities’ financial interests – Fight against fraud – Annual reports 2005 and 2006
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................14
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................14
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................17
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...17
o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti – Boj proti goljufijam – Letno poročilo 2005–2006
on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests – fight against fraud – annual reports 2005 and 2006
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o prejšnjih letnih poročilih Komisije in Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF),
– having regard to its resolutions on previous annual reports of the Commission and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 12. julija 2006 z naslovom Zaščita finančnih interesov Skupnosti – Boj proti goljufijam – Letno poročilo 2005 ( KOM(2006)0378 ), vključno s prilogami ( SEC(2006)0911 in SEC(2006)0912 ),
– having regard to the report of 12 July 2006 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Protection of the Communities’ financial interests – Fight against fraud – Annual report 2005’ ( COM(2006)0378 ), including the annexes ( SEC(2006)0911 and SEC(2006)0912 ) thereto,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 6. julija 2007 z naslovom Zaščita finančnih interesov Skupnosti – Boj proti goljufijam – Letno poročilo 2006 ( KOM(2007)0390 ), vključno s prilogami ( SEC(2007)0930 in SEC(2007)0938 ),
– having regard to the report of 6 July 2007 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Protection of the financial interests of the Communities – Fight against fraud – Annual report 2006’ ( COM(2007)0390 ), including the annexes ( SEC(2007)0930 and SEC(2007)0938 ) thereto,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o delu Evropskega urada za bolj proti goljufijam (OLAF) za leto 2005
– having regard to the OLAF Annual Activity Report for 2005
– ob upoštevanju poročila o delu Evropskega urada za bolj proti goljufijam (OLAF) za leto 2006
– having regard to the OLAF Annual Activity Report for 2006
– ob upoštevanju poročila o delu nadzornega odbora Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) za obdobje od decembra 2005 do maja 2007
– having regard to the Activity Report of the OLAF Supervisory Committee for the period December 2005 to May 2007
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2005
– having regard to the annual report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2005
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2006
– having regard to the annual report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2006
– ob upoštevanju členov 276(3) in 280(5) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 276(3) and 280(5) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES, Euratom) Sveta št. 1995/2006 z dne 13. decembra 2006 o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 of 13 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
UL C 390, 30.12.2006, str.
OJ C 390, 30.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2185/96 z dne 11. novembra 1996 o pregledih in inšpekcijah na kraju samem, ki jih opravlja Komisija za zaščito finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi nepravilnostmi
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenj Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja( A6‑0009/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the Committee on Regional Development, and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0009/2008 ),
A. ob upoštevanju vsebine člena 280(1) in (2) Pogodbe ES,
A. having regard to the substance of Article 280(1) and (2) of the EC Treaty,
B. ker člen 53b(2) Finančne uredbe določa:
B. whereas Article 53(b)(2) of the Financial Regulation provides as follows:
Brez poseganja v dopolnilne določbe, vključene v ustrezne predpise posameznih sektorjev, in da bi pri deljenem upravljanju zagotovile, da se sredstva uporabijo v skladu z veljavnimi pravili in načeli, države članice sprejmejo vse zakonodajne, ureditvene in upravne ali druge ukrepe, potrebne za zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti.
Without prejudice to complementary provisions included in relevant sector-specific regulations, and in order to ensure in shared management that the funds are used in accordance with the applicable rules and principles, the Member States shall take all the legislative, regulatory and administrative or other measures necessary for protecting the Communities' financial interests.
a) se prepričajo, da so ukrepi, financirani iz proračuna, dejansko izvedeni, in zagotovijo, da so izvedeni pravilno;
(a) satisfy themselves that actions financed from the budget are actually carried out and ensure that they are implemented correctly;
b) preprečijo in odpravljajo nepravilnosti in goljufije;
(b) prevent and deal with irregularities and fraud;
c) izterjajo nepravilno plačana ali nepravilno uporabljena sredstva ali sredstva, izgubljena zaradi nepravilnosti ali napak;
(c) recover funds wrongly paid or incorrectly used or funds lost as a result of irregularities or errors;
d) z ustreznimi uredbami za posamezne sektorje in v skladu s členom 30(3), zagotovijo primerne naknadne objave upravičencev sredstev, ki izhajajo iz proračuna.
(d) ensure, by means of relevant sector-specific regulations and in conformity with Article 30(3), adequate annual ex post publication of beneficiaries of funds deriving from the budget.
V ta namen države članice izvajajo redne preglede in uvedejo uspešen in učinkovit sistem notranje kontrole, (...)",
To that effect, the Member States shall conduct checks and shall put in place an effective and efficient internal control system, (…)." ,
Znesek sporočenih nepravilnosti
Amount of irregularities notified
2. zahteva, da se letna poročila o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti in tudi poročila, ki jih Parlament pripravlja na osnovi omenjenih poročil, vključijo v dnevni red Sveta, ki nato Parlamentu in Komisiji sporoči svoje pripombe;
Calls for the annual reports on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests and the reports drawn up by Parliament on the basis of those reports to be included on the Council’s agenda, and for the Council subsequently to forward its observations to Parliament and the Commission;
– lastna sredstva: 353 milijonov EUR (328,4 milijonov EUR v letu 2005, 212,4 milijonov EUR v letu 2004, 269,9 milijonov EUR v letu 2003 in 367 milijonov EUR in letu 2002),
– own resources: EUR 353 million (EUR 328,4 million in 2005, EUR 212,4 million in 2004, EUR 269,9 million in 2003 and EUR 367 million in 2002),
– garancije Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS): 87 milijonov EUR (102 milijonov EUR v letu 2005, 82,1 milijonov EUR v letu 2004, 169,7 milijonov EUR v letu 2003 in 198,1 milijonov EUR in letu 2002),
– guarantees under the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF): EUR 87 million (EUR 102 million in 2005, EUR 82,1 million in 2004, EUR 169,7 million in 2003 and EUR 198,1 million in 2002),
– strukturne ukrepe: 703 milijonov EUR (601 milijonov EUR v letu 2005, 694,5 milijonov EUR v letu 2004, 482,2 milijonov EUR v letu 2003 in 614,1 milijona EUR v letu 2002);
– structural actions: EUR € 703 million (EUR 601 million in 2005, EUR 694,5 million in 2004, EUR 482,2 million in 2003 and EUR 614,1 million in 2002);
ugotavlja tudi, da je bilo v letu 2006 sporočenih nepravilnosti na področju predpristopnih skladov v skupnem znesku 12,32 milijona EUR (17,6 milijona EUR v proračunskem letu 2005),
notes, too, that in the area of pre-accession funds irregularities notified in 2006 totalled EUR 12,32 million (EUR 17,6 million in 2005);
Splošna analiza
General analysis
8. pozdravlja sprejetje uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike
Welcomes the adoption of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (CAP)
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1437/2007 (UL L 322, 7.12.2007, str.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1437/2007 OJ L 322, 7.12.2007, p.
9. pozdravlja, da integriran administrativni in kontrolni sistem (IACS), s katerim se izvaja 68 % operacij, dobro deluje, in da je omogočil ugotovitev velikega deleža nepravilnosti;
Is encouraged that the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS), through which 68% of operations are processed, is functioning well and has made it possible to detect a large proportion of irregularities;
Komisarka Hübnerjeva je v pisnem odgovoru odboru za proračunski nadzor zapisala „leta 2006 je Španija začasno ustavila plačila iz ESRR v pričakovanju ugotovitev revizij popravnih ukrepov.
Commissioner Hübner stated in a written answer to the Committee on Budgetary Control that "in 2006 ERDF payment claims have been held back by Spain pending the results of audits of remedial measures.
13. poziva Komisijo, da oceni učinkovitost in transparentnost sistemov spremljanja, ki se nanašajo na plačila kmetov, v okviru svojega letnega poročila o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti;
Calls on the Commission to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its annual report on the protection of the Communities financial interests;
15. ugotavlja, da je Komisija sprejela drugo poročilo o pomanjkljivostih pri izvajanju sistema 'črne liste' (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1469/95
Notes the adoption by the Commission of its second report on the shortcomings in the implementation of the 'blacklist' system (Council Regulation (EC) No 1469/95
18. ugotavlja, da je treba za leto 2006 izterjati še 266,5 od 703 milijonov EUR, medtem ko je treba za prejšnja leta zbrati še 762 milijonov EUR; zahteva, da Komisija dvakrat letno obvesti pristojne odbore Parlamenta o doseženem napredku in posebnih ukrepih, sprejetih za pospešitev izterjave neporavnanih zneskov;
Notes that EUR 266,5 million out of a total of EUR 703 million has still to be recovered for 2006, while for previous years EUR 762 million still needs to be recovered; calls on the Commission to inform Parliament's competent committees twice a year on the progress made and the specific measures taken in order to speed up the recovery of the outstanding amounts;
20. je še naprej prepričan, da se morajo države članice in institucije EU, vključno z Računskim sodiščem, politično zediniti o „sprejemljivi stopnji napak“, če se želi kdaj koli doseči pozitivna izjava o zanesljivosti;
Remains convinced that Member States and EU institutions, including the Court of Auditors, must come to a political understanding on a 'tolerable error rate' if a positive declaration of assurance is ever to be achieved;
21. zahteva, da Komisija v naslednje letno poročilo za leto 2008 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti vključi analizo struktur držav članic, ki sodelujejo v boju proti nepravilnostim; ta analiza bi morala med drugim odgovoriti na naslednja vprašanja, da bi imel Parlament jasnejšo sliko o izvajanju zakonodajnega okvira v zvezi z bojem proti goljufijam:
Calls on the Commission to include in the 2008 annual report on the protection of the Communities' financial interests an analysis of the Member States' structures involved in combating irregularities; that analysis should answer, among others, the following questions in order to give Parliament a clearer picture of the implementation of the legislative framework of the anti-fraud network:
– kateri nacionalni organi držav članic so vključeni v tem proračunskem letu?
– which national authorities in the Member States are involved in this exercise?
– kako organizirajo sodelovanje?
– how do they organise their cooperation?
– katera pooblastila za inšpekcijo imajo nacionalni organi?
– what powers of inspection do the national authorities have?
– ali ti nacionalni organi delujejo na podlagi letnega programa dela?
– do those national authorities operate on a basis of annual programming?
– ali morajo sestaviti poročilo o ciljih, ki jih je treba doseči med spremljanjem?
– are they obliged to draw up a report on the objectives to be pursued in their monitoring activity?
– ali so nacionalni organi dolžni pripraviti poročilo o uporabi sredstev Evropske unije?
– are the national authorities obliged to draw up a report on the use of EU funds?
– na kakšen način sodelujejo z Evropskim uradom za bolj proti goljufijam in na kakšen način obveščajo Komisijo o svojih ugotovitvah?
– how do they cooperate with OLAF and in which way are their findings communicated to the Commission?
– do katerih podatkovnih baz imajo neposreden dostop?
– to what European databases do they have direct access?
– do katerih podatkovnih baz lahko dostopa Komisija?
– which national databases can the Commission access?
– kakšni so predvideni stroški nadzora?
– what are the estimated costs of controls?
– kateri so mehanizmi sporočanja nepravilnosti?
– what are the mechanisms for reporting irregularities?
– kakšno je stanje v zvezi z izvajanjem uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2185/96?
– what is the state of play regarding implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2185/96?
24. meni, da je obdobje 39 mesecev (od takrat, ko je bila storjena nepravilnost, do takrat, ko se o njej sporoči Komisiji), nesprejemljivo, ker tak odlog izterjavo še bolj oteži; sprašuje Komisijo, katere ukrepe je sprejela, da bi države članice pozvala k redu; ugotavlja, da ravnanje držav članic kaže premalo pazljivosti;
Considers that a period of 39 months between the time when an irregularity is committed and the time when it is notified to the Commission is unacceptable, as such a delay makes recovery more difficult; asks the Commission what measures it has taken to call the Member States to order; notes that the Member States’ actions indicate a degree of complacency;
26. zahteva, naj Komisija zavzame odločno stališče, če Grčija ne bo spoštovala akcijskega načrta za uvedbo integriranega upravnega in nadzornega sistema
Asks what measures the Commission has taken to reduce the number of irregularities in the rural development, beef and veal, and fruit and vegetables sectors;
Letno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2006: ‘5.11.
The annual report of the Court of Auditors concerning the financial year 2006: ‘5.11.
Že peto leto zapored vsebujejo izjave generalnega direktorja pridržek glede nezadostnega izvajanja IAKS v Grčiji.
For the fifth consecutive year the Director General’s declaration contains a reservation concerning insufficient implementation of the IACS in Greece .
Sodišče je za leto 2006 potrdilo, da se ključne kontrole še vedno niso izvajale, in sicer: obravnavanje zahtevkov, postopki inšpekcijskih pregledov, celovitost zbirke podatkov za živali in identifikacijski sistem zemljiških parcel (LPIS).“ ; želi biti obveščen o skupnem znesku subvencij/pomoči, ki so bile iz proračuna Skupnosti do zdaj plačane Grčiji za vzpostavitev sistema IACS in ali je mogoča izterjava tega zneska, če sistem do septembra 2008 ne bo v celoti deloval;
For 2006 the Court has confirmed continuing failure to implement key controls, namely: claims handling, inspection procedures, animal database integrity and the Land Parcel Identification System.’ ; would like to be informed about the total amount of the grants/aid from the Community budget paid to Greece to set up the IACS until now and whether this amount can be recovered if the system is not fully operational by September 2008;