natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega bo direktor povabljen, da pred pristojnim odborom (pristojnimi odbori) Evropskega parlamenta poda izjavo in odgovarja na vprašanja, ki mu jih bodo zastavili člani teh odborov pred njegovim imenovanjem (člen 10).
Additionally, the director will be invited to make a statement before the competent committee(s) of the European Parliament and answer questions put by its/their members before his appointment (Article 10).
V sporazumu je večinoma upoštevan predlog Komisije, da je treba povečati tematsko pristojnost fundacije, tako da bo zajemala razvoj človeških virov, zlasti izobraževanje in usposabljanje v okviru vseživljenjske perspektive, ter s tem povezana vprašanja trga dela.
Furthermore, the agreement largely follows the proposal of the Commission to broaden ETF’s thematic remit, to cover human capital development, in particular education and training in a lifelong perspective, as well as related labour market issues.
Na podlagi novih instrumentov in prednostnih nalog politike zunanjih odnosov Evropske unije je treba tudi posodobiti ter ponovno opredeliti geografsko območje fundacije.
Finally, the ETF’s geographical scope has been updated and redefined by reference to the new European Union's external relations policy instruments and priorities.
Jan Andersson, Edit Bauer, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Jan Cremers, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Stephen Hughes, Ona Juknevičienė, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Maria Matsouka, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Biljana Ilieva Raeva, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jean Spautz, Gabriele Stauner, Ewa Tomaszewska, Anne Van Lancker
Jan Andersson, Edit Bauer, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Jan Cremers, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Stephen Hughes, Ona Juknevičienė, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Maria Matsouka, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jean Spautz, Gabriele Stauner, Ewa Tomaszewska, Anne Van Lancker
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta Solidarnostnega sklada EU v skladu s točko 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund, in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2008)0732 – C6-0393/2008 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0732 – C6‑0393/2008 ),
1. še posebej točke 26 tega sporazuma,
1. , and in particular point 26 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije,
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sprejete med usklajevalnim sestankom 17. julija 2008 o Solidarnostnem skladu,
– having regard to the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008 on the Solidarity Fund,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6–0474/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and to the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0474/2008 ),
z dne xx. decembra 2008
of xx December 2008
o uporabi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v skladu s točko 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
on mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund, in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
(1) Evropska unija je Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije ustanovila („sklad“), da bi izkazala solidarnost prebivalstvu območij, ki so jih prizadele nesreče;
(1) The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund ('the Fund') to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(2) medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 omogoča uporabo sklada do letne zgornje meje v višini 1 milijarde EUR;
(2) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
(4) Ciper je predložil vlogo za uporabo sklada v zvezi s posledicami suše;
(4) Cyprus has submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by drought.
Za splošni proračun Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008 bodo uporabljena sredstva iz Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije, in sicer 7.605.445 EUR za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 7 605 445 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Komisija je predlagala uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v korist Cipra na podlagi točke 26 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Solidarity Fund in favour of Cyprus on the basis of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
Medinstitucionalni sporazum dopušča uporabo sklada do letne zgornje meje v višini 1 milijarde EUR.
The IIA allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
Med letom 2008 je bilo skupaj porabljenih 273.191.197 EUR za Združeno kraljestvo (162.387.985 EUR), Grčijo (89.769.009 EUR), Slovenijo (8.254.203 EUR) in Francijo (Guadeloupe in Martinique 12.780.000 EUR).
During 2008 a global amount of 273.191.197 Euros has been mobilised in favour of respectively the UK (162.387.985 Euros), Greece (89.769.009 Euros), Slovenia (8.254.203 Euros) and France (Guadalupe and Martinique - 12 780 000 Euros).
Komisija je predložila spremembo proračuna (SP št. 10/2008), da bi v proračun za leto 2008 vnesla posebna sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in plačila, kot zahteva točka 26 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
The Commission has presented an amending budget (AB No 10/2008) in order to enter in the 2008 budget specific commitment and payment appropriation as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
Ciper je zaprosil za pomoč iz sklada zaradi suše, ki je državo prizadela lani spomladi in vrhunec dosegla aprila 2008.
Cyprus applied for assistance of Fund following the drought that affected the country last springtime and culminated in April 2008.
Po potrditvi, da vloga izpolnjuje merila za upravičenost iz uredbe Sveta ((ES) št. 2012/2002), je Komisija predlagala uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije za skupni znesek 7.605.445 EUR, ki bo dodeljen iz razdelka 3b finančnega okvira.
After verifying that this application complies with the eligibility criteria of Council regulation (EC) N° 2012/2002), the Commission proposes to mobilise the EU solidarity Fund for a total amount of EUR 7 605 445, to be allocated under heading 3b of the Financial Framework.
Zaradi tega se bodo ustrezno, za 7.605.445 EUR, zmanjšala plačila v proračunski vrstici 13 04 02 (Kohezijski sklad – naslov 1b).
The amount corresponds to a reduction in payment appropriations of 7 605 445 Mio Euro from the budget line 13 04 02 (Cohesion Fund - Heading 1b).
Poročevalec se strinja, da je Komisija v predhodni predlog spremembe proračuna št. 11/2008 vključila le predlog za uporabo sredstev sklada, in spominja, da sta Parlament in Svet 17. julija 2008 pri usklajevanju med vejama proračunskega organa v skupni izjavi navedla, da „pozdravljata zavezo Komisije, po kateri bo od zdaj naprej namen vsakršnega predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna, potrebne zaradi uporabe solidarnostnega sklada, izključno ta“.
The Rapporteur welcomes that the Commission has proposed the EUSF mobilisation as the sole issue in the PDAB 11/2008, and reminds that on 17 July 2008, during the conciliation between the two arms of the budgetary authority, the Parliament and the Council in a common declaration stated that they "(…) welcome the Commission commitment according to which, as from now, every preliminary draft amending budget required by the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund will be solely for that purpose."
V skladu s točko 26 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma so potrebni tristranski pogovori, preden obe veji proračunskega organa privolita v uporabo sredstev sklada.
According to point 26 of the IIA, a trialogue should be held before the two arms of the budgetary authority give their agreement to the mobilisation.
Zaradi nujnosti spremembe proračuna št. 11/2008 sta se obe veji proračunskega organa dogovorili za poenostavljeni postopek.
Due to the urgency the amending budget 11/2008 both arms of the budgetary authority agreed on a simplified procedure.
Višino škode in pomoč, ki jo je predlagala Komisija, lahko povzamemo takole:
The amount of damage and the aid proposed by the Commission can be resumed as follows:
Znesek na podlagi stopnje 2,5 %
Amount based on 2.5%
Znesek na podlagi stopnje 6 %
Amount based on 6%
Skupni predlagani znesek pomoči
Total amount of aid proposed
Poročevalec predlaga, da se predlog Komisije za sklep, priložen temu poročilu, odobri.
The Rapporteur recommends the approval of the Commission proposal for a decision annexed to this report.
Zadeva: Predlog Komisije za sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (KOM(2008)732 končno)
Subject: The European Commission's proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and the Council on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund (COM(2008) 732 final)
Da ne bi po nepotrebnem odlašali z odobritvijo tega ukrepa, ki ga Odbor za proračun namerava čim prej sprejeti, vas z zadovoljstvom obveščam, da Odbor za regionalni razvoj ne nasprotuje uporabi solidarnostnega sklada v znesku 7.605.445 EUR za Ciper, kot je predlagala Evropska komisija, in sicer v skladu s pravili iz medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 in uredbe št. 2012/2002.
In order to avoid undue delay in approving this measure which the committee on Budgets intends to adopt as soon as possible, I am pleased to inform you that the committee on Regional Development has no objection to the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund to provide the sum of Euro 7.605.445 to Cyprus as proposed by the European Commission and in accordance with the rules laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 and Regulation N° 2012/2002.
Marusja Ivanova Ljubčeva, Gianluca Susta
Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Gianluca Susta
o možnostih za razvoj civilnega dialoga v okviru lizbonske pogodbe
on the perspectives for developing civil dialogue under the Treaty of Lisbon
– ob upoštevanju lizbonske pogodbe, podpisane 13. decembra 2007, ki spreminja Pogodbo o Evropski uniji in Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti
– having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon on 13 December 2007
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0055 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0055 . ,
– ob upoštevanju številnih resolucij, ki jih je sprejel v sedanjem zakonodajnem obdobju in v katerih je obravnavana tematika civilne družbe,
– having regard to the various resolutions dealing with civil society that it has adopted during the current parliamentary term,
– ob upoštevanju zaključkov delavnice, ki je potekala s predstavniki civilne družbe 3. junija 2008,
– having regard to its workshop held with representatives of civil society organisations on 3 June 2008,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0475/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0475/2008 ),
A. ker demokratična in državljanom prijazna Evropska unija predpostavlja tesno sodelovanje evropskih institucij in držav članic s civilno družbo na evropski, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni,
A. whereas a democratic European Union that is close to citizens requires close cooperation between the EU institutions and Member States and civil society at European, national, regional and local level,
B. ker je odprtost evropskih, nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih institucij za dialog in sodelovanje z državljankami in državljani ter organizacijami civilne družbe osnovni pogoj za pravno ureditev in upravljanje na vseh ravneh,
B. whereas an openness on the part of EU institutions and national, regional and local authorities to dialogue and cooperation with citizens and civil society organisations is a basic prerequisite for the latter's involvement in lawmaking and governance at all levels,
C. ker lizbonska pogodba krepi pravice evropskih državljanov v odnosu do Evropske unije, saj državljanom in združenjem, ki zastopajo civilno družbo, olajšuje udeležbo pri razpravah o „Evropi državljank in državljanov”,
C. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon enhances the rights of EU citizens vis-à-vis the Union by making it easier for citizens and representative civil society associations to take part in discussion on a “citizens' Europe”,
D. ker aktualne določbe, ki prav tako izhajajo iz lizbonske pogodbe, sicer ustvarjajo ustrezen pravni okvir za civilni dialog na evropski ravni, vendar njihova uporaba v praksi ni vedno ustrezno zastavljena,
D. whereas the current provisions, which have also been included in the Treaty of Lisbon, establish a vital legal framework for the development of civil dialogue at European level; whereas, however, those provisions are not always satisfactorily implemented,
E. ker so civilne družbe v 27 državah članicah na različnih stopnjah razvoja in v različni meri posegajo po sredstvih za participativno oblikovanje politike, udeležbo pri pravni ureditvi in dialogu z nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi oblastmi,
E. whereas civil society is at different stages of development in the 27 Member States, taking advantage to differing degrees of opportunities for involvement in participatory democracy, the lawmaking process and dialogue with national, regional and local authorities,
F. ker se izraz „civilna družba“ nanaša na številne nevladne in neprofitne organizacije, ki so jih prostovoljno ustanovili državljani in so prisotne v javnem življenju ter so na podlagi etničnih, kulturnih, političnih, znanstvenih, verskih ali filantropskih načel izraz interesov, zamisli in ideologij njihovih članov in drugih ljudi,
F. whereas the term “civil society” refers to the numerous non-governmental and not-for-profit organisations established by citizens, of their own will, that have a presence in public life, expressing the interests, ideas and ideologies of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations,
G. ker se mnenja o vprašanju določitve reprezentativnega značaja organizacij civilne družbe razhajajo in dejavnosti ter učinkovitost nekaterih organizacij pri uveljavljanju svojih stališč ne ustrezajo vedno obsegu njihove reprezentativnosti,
G. whereas the representativeness of civil society organisations is very much a moot point, and whereas the vigour and effectiveness with which some organisations promote their ideas does not always reflect their representativeness,
1. pozdravlja prispevek Evropske unije k razvoju civilnega dialoga na evropski ravni, pa tudi na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni;
Welcomes the contribution made by the European Union to the development of civil dialogue, both at European level and at national, regional and local level in the Member States;
5. pozdravlja pripravo reprezentativnih in participativnih političnih elementov, ki jih prinaša lizbonska pogodba, zlasti tako imenovano pobudo državljanov, ki določa, da milijon državljank in državljanov iz več držav članic lahko pozove Komisijo k pripravi zakonodajnega predloga;
Welcomes the enhancement of representative democracy and participatory democracy resulting from the provision made in the Treaty of Lisbon for “citizens' initiatives” enabling one million citizens from a number of Member States to invite the Commission to submit a legislative proposal;
7. poziva institucije Evropske unije, naj v civilni dialog vključijo vse zainteresirane predstavnike civilne družbe, pri čemer je zlasti treba upoštevati glas mladih državljank in državljanov EU, k bodo zasnovali „jutrišnjo Evropo“ in prevzeli odgovornost zanjo;
Calls on the EU institutions to involve all interested civil society representatives in the civil dialogue; considers it essential, in this connection, for the voice of young Europeans, who will shape and take responsibility for the European Union of tomorrow, to be heard;
9. poziva institucije Evropske unije, naj v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu sprejmejo zavezujoče smernice za imenovanje predstavnikov civilne družbe, metode za pripravo posvetovanj in njihovo financiranje ter pri tem upoštevajo splošna načela in minimalne standarde za posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi
Calls on the EU institutions to adopt in an interinstitutional agreement binding guidelines concerning the appointment of civil society representatives, methods for organising consultations and their funding, in accordance with the general principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties
10. poziva institucije Evropske unije, naj civilni dialog zastavijo kot skupno nalogo za vse generalne direktorate Komisije, vse delovne skupine Sveta Evropske unije in vse odbore Evropskega parlamenta ter pri tem upoštevajo načelo preglednosti ter ohranjajo uravnotežen odnos med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem;
Calls on the EU institutions to make civil dialogue a horizontal task for all directorates-general in the Commission, all Council working parties in the Council of Ministers and all committees in the European Parliament, using transparent procedures and maintaining a genuine balance between the public and private sectors;
20. poudarja, da je poleg dialoga s civilno družbo potreben tudi odprt, pregleden in reden dialog med Evropsko unijo ter cerkvami in verskimi skupnostmi, kot je predvideno v lizbonski pogodbi;
Stresses that, besides dialogue with civil society, there also needs to be an open, transparent and regular dialogue between the Union and churches and religious communities, as provided for by the Treaty of Lisbon;
„Ne povezujemo držav, temveč združujemo ljudi”
'We are not seeking coalitions between States, we are uniting people'
„Ničesar o nas brez nas” je tisto, kar evropski državljani pričakujejo od institucij Evropske unije.
What European citizens expect of the EU institutions is summed up by the slogan 'Nothing about us without us'.
Z zaporednimi širitvami je Unija povečala ne le število držav članic, temveč tudi število svojih državljanov, za katere velja zakonodaja Skupnosti.
The successive EU enlargements have increased not only the number of Member States but also the number of people to whom Community law applies.
Čeprav je Unija projekt, ki je venomer podrvžen spremembam in preoblikovanjem, temu na žalost ne sledi komunikacija med Unijo in državljani.
And while the EU is a project subject to continuous change, communication between the Union and citizens has, regrettably, failed to keep pace with that change.
Nastal je namreč viden prepad v komunikaciji, pri čemer so bili francoski in nizozemski „ne” evropski ustavi ter irski „ne” lizbonski pogodbi le nekateri izmed izrazov nezadovoljstva.
A clearly visible communication gap has opened up, and this was reflected in both the French and Dutch rejection of the Constitution for Europe and the Irish rejection of the Lisbon Treaty.
Kaže, da se ta prepad zmanjšuje zahvaljujoč pobudam in projektom, ki so jih začele evropske institucije.
That gap appears to be narrowing as a result of the measures and projects implemented by the EU institutions.
Ti lepo kažejo, da je mogoče vplivati na participativno oblikovanje politike v zvezi z evropskimi vprašanji na lokalni, regionalni, nacionalni in nadnacionalni ravni.
The efforts that have been made show that concerted action to influence the development of participative democracy around European issues at local, regional, national and supranational level can be successful.
Od devetdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja dalje se evropske institucije počasi, vendar z gotovostjo odpirajo državljanom ter vedno bolj priznavajo vlogo civilne družbe, katero vse bolj pogosto sprašujejo za mnenje.
Since the 1990s the European institutions have been slowly but surely becoming more open towards the general public, increasingly recognising the role played by civil society and increasingly seeking its opinion.
Vendar pa mora Unija na področju komunikacij in še zlasti civilnega dialoga še veliko nadoknaditi.
Nonetheless, the EU still has a lot of ground to make up as regards communication and, specifically, civil dialogue.
Jasno je, da evropski projekt ne more biti oblikovan brez državljanov, s katerimi je treba komunicirati, če želimo, da demokracija deluje.
It is self-evident that the European project cannot be taken forward without the involvement of European citizens; what is more, one cannot have a fully functioning democracy without proper communication with the public.
Po drugi strani je treba državljanom Unije za vzbuditev njihovega zanimanja in njihovo podporo posredovati popolne informacije, sprožiti živahno in odprto razpravo z njimi ter jih na aktiven način vključiti v reševanje evropskih vprašanj, v skladu z načelom: „Vsak državljan ima pravico sodelovati v demokratičnem življenju Unije.
At the same time, public engagement with and support for the EU can be secured only by means of full information provision, open and dynamic debate and active public involvement in EU affairs, in accordance with the principle under which 'every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union.
Odločitve se sprejemajo kar najbolj odprto in demokratično.” (člen 10 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji)
Decisions shall be taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen' (Article 10 of the Treaty on European Union).
Lizbonska pogodba je civilnemu dialogu namenila mesto nadrejenega načela, ki povezuje skoraj vse evropske politike in področja delovanja Unije (naslov II „Določbe o demokratičnih načelih” iz Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, člen 11).
The Lisbon Treaty give civil dialogue the status of a fundamental principle covering practically all EU policies and spheres of activity (Title II – Provisions on democratic principles – of the Treaty on European Union, in particular Article 11 thereof).
O civilnem dialogu pa ne moremo govoriti brez sodelovanja civilne družbe.
However, there can be no civil dialogue without the involvement of civil society.
Zaradi tega je poročevalka aprila 2008 v Parlamentu organizirala seminar o možnostih razvoja civilnega dialoga po začetku veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe.
Accordingly, in June 2008 the rapporteur organised a seminar within the EP on the prospects for the development of civil dialogue following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.
Seminar, na katerem je sodelovalo veliko število predstavnikov civilne družbe, je bil resnično uspešen, njegovi zaključki pa so bili uporabljeni tudi pri oblikovanju tega poročila.
The seminar, which was attended by a large number of civil society representatives, was a great success, and the thought-provoking conclusions reached have, among other things, served as a basis for this report.