natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tveganje je postalo preveliko, saj če ena država članica med obdobjem skupnega prehoda ne bi uspešno izvedla migracije, bi neposredna posledica bila ponovna vzpostavitev njenih meja (saj ne bi več imela dostopa do sistema SIS).
The risk became too high because if one Member State, during this common switch-over period, fails to have a successful migration, the direct consequence would be to put back immediately its borders (because it wouldn't have access anymore to the SIS).
Da se izključi ta možnost je bilo treba ustvariti nadomestno rešitev, ki bi omogočila ponovni prehod na sistem SIS 1+, če bi bilo to potrebno.
In order to avoid this contingency, it was necessary to create a sort of back-up solution so as to be able to switch back to SIS 1+ if necessary.
Da bi se zmanjšalo tveganje za motnje v delovanju sistema med migracijo, bo prehodna tehnična arhitektura za delovanje SIS 1+ omogočala vzporedno delovanje SIS 1+ in nekaterih tehničnih delov arhitekture SIS II v prehodnem obdobju, ki bo zelo kratko.
In order to reduce the risks of service disruption during migration an interim technical architecture for the operation of SISI+ will allow SIS I+ and certain technical parts of the architecture of SIS II to operate in parallel for a transitional period, which will be kept very limited.
Po tem obdobju bo na razpolago tudi tehnično orodje, pretvornik, ki bo omogočal uspešno pretvarjanje in usklajevanje podatkov med SIS 1+ in SIS II, in ki bo v uporabi zelo kratko obdobje.
Beyond that, a technical tool will also be made available - a "converter" - allowing for the successful conversion and synchronisation of data between SIS 1+ and SIS II, to be used for a very limited period of time.
Pretvornik povezuje centralni sistem SIS 1+ s centralnim sistemom SIS II, kar obema omogoča, da obdelujeta iste podatke, in zagotavlja, da države članice, ki so že uspešno povezane v sistem SIS II, ostanejo na enaki ravni kot tiste, ki so še vedno povezane na SIS 1+.
The converter connects the SIS 1+ central system with the SIS II central system, enabling both to process the same information and ensuring that the Member States already successful connected to the SIS II stay on the same level as the others that are still connected to the SIS 1+.
Da se omogoči delovanje prehodne tehnične arhitekture, je bila dodana nova funkcija, ki v prvi pogodbi ni bila predvidena - možnost prehoda nazaj.
In order to allow that interim technical architecture to work, a new function that was not previewed in the first contract has been added - the reverse mode.
Cilj predloga Komisije ni le oblikovati pravni okvir za migracijo, ampak tudi celovit preskus, zlasti da bi se pokazalo, da je raven uspešnosti delovanja SIS II najmanj enakovredna ravni SIS 1+.
The current proposal intends not only to establish the legal framework governing the migration, but also the comprehensive test, with a view to demonstrating, in particular, that the level of performance of SIS II is at least equivalent to that achieved with SIS 1+.
Poleg tega bo predlog urejal izvedbo preskusa izmenjave dopolnilnih podatkov.
Furthermore, it intends to regulate the performance of tests on the exchange of supplementary information.
Faza razvoja iz preizkušanja
Development and testing phase
Treba je izpolniti pogoje iz člena 71(2) sklepa 2007/533/PNZ z 12. junija 2007 (vključno s tem, da bi moral biti Parlament obveščen o vseh rezultatih), šele nato pa bi bilo treba opraviti migracijo podatkov, in sicer z enkratno migracijo.
The conditions stated in Article 71 of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 should be fulfilled (including the fact that the European Parliament should be informed of all the results) and only after that, the migration of the data should take place, in one-shoot migration.
Ti štirje pogoji so:
These four conditions are:
- sprejetje potrebnih izvedbenih ukrepov;
- the adoption of the necessary implementing measures;
- poročanje držav članic o potrebnih tehničnih in pravnih pripravah;
- the notification about necessary technical and legal arrangements by the Member States;
- uspešno opravljen celovit preskus;
- the successful completion of a comprehensive test;
- potrebne tehnične priprave za povezavo nacionalnih sistemov na centralni sistem.
- the necessary technical arrangements for connecting the national systems to the central system;
Operativni zagon SIS II označuje konec faze razvoja in začetek izvrševanja pravne podlage SIS II.
The operational start of SIS II marks the end of the development phase and the beginning of the SIS II legal basis applicability.
Po tej logiki mora faza migracije biti zadnja naloga v okviru razvojnega mandata za SIS II.
Following that logic, than the migration phase has to be the final task under the development mandate for SIS II.
V skladu z zahtevo poročevalca Evropskega parlamenta je podpredsednik Barrot 13. junija 2008 odgovoril s pismom, v katerem je navedel, da je faza preskušanja že v teku, ter opisal 12 različnih faz do začetka delovanja SIS II, ki je predvideno za 30. september 2009.
Following a request of the European Parliament's Rapporteur, Vice-President Barrot responded with a letter, on 13th June 2008, stating that the testing phase is already taking place and describing the 12 different phases until the start of operations of the SIS II, that is foreseen for 30 September 2009.
Treba je imeti mandat za razvoj SIS II do operativnega zagona sistema.
It is necessary to have a SIS II development mandate until the operational start of SIS II, the so-called "go live".
Ta mandat mora omogočiti dokončanje vseh nalog, ki so bile določene kot predpogoji v pravnih instrumentih SIS II, vključno s pripravami za operativni zagon.
This mandate must allow to carry out all tasks defined as preconditions in the SIS II Legal Instruments, including the preparation of the operational start.
To pomeni popravo vseh napak, odkritih pri fazah preskušanja, ter izpolnitev vseh predpogojev, kot so testne platforme in sredstva.
This means the correction of any bugs identified during the test phases and the provision of all necessary preconditions such as test platforms and resources.
Zaključek vseh preskusov se lahko šteje za uspešnega le, ko se ne odkrijejo več večje ovire ali napake.
The finalisation of all tests should only be considered successful when no more blockings or major bugs are identified.
Doslej je projekt vodila Komisija, ki je skrbela tudi za odnose z izvajalcem, s katerim je bila sklenjena pogodba s tem namenom.
Until now the project management has been done by the Commission, as well as the management of the relation with the firm contracted for this purpose.
Če Komisija zaključi svoj mandat pred fazo začetka delovanja, bodo prenehali tudi odnosi z izvajalcem.
If the Commission ends its mandate before the "go live" phase, than the relations with the contractor should also come to an end.
Podjetje je dobilo plačilo zato, da izroči popolnoma delujoč sistem.
Nevertheless, this firm has been paid to deliver a system perfectly working.
Ob upoštevanju tega, kako je lahko sprejemljivo, da pogodba z njim preneha, preden se prepričamo, da je sistem popolnoma delujoč in da se morebitne težave in napake (ki se bodo zagotovo še pojavile) rešijo, kar bi moralo biti opravljeno še v okviru te pogodbe?
This being so, how can it be acceptable for its contract to end before we know that the system is fully operational and any eventual problems and bugs (that certainly still will appear) are solved, which should still be done in the framework of that contract?
Kako lahko pogodba preneha decembra 2008, če bo testiranih le 15 držav članic in še ne vse med njimi?
How can this contract finish in December 2008, if only 15 Member States will be tested and not all of them?
Je mogoče dobiti zagotovilo, da bo sistem deloval enako, če bo dodanih še 10 držav članic?
Can guarantees be given that the performance of the system will be the same if 10 more Member States will be added?
Ali se pričakuje, da bo treba za to novo fazo najti novega izvajalca ter izgraditi novo delovno okolje znotraj struktur Sveta, da se bo lahko nadaljevalo z delom in preskušanjem, dokler sistem ni pripravljen na začetek delovanja (kar je bilo načeloma že naročeno in plačano prejšnjemu izvajalcu)?
It is expected that for this new phase, a new contractor will have to be found and a new working environment will have to be rebuilt, inside of the Council structures, in order to proceed with the work and carry out the necessary tests until the system is in a position to become operational (which was, in principle, already required from and paid to the previous contractor).
Ali je zaradi te možnosti treba narediti nov časovni razpored, da se upoštevajo vsi ti novi vidiki, ki predhodno niso bili predvideni?
In this case, will this option make it necessary to have a new calendar in order to take into account all these new aspects that were not previously foreseen?
Migracija s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) (sklep)
Migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
o osnutku uredbe Sveta o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II).
on the draft Council regulation on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
– ob upoštevanju osnutka uredbe Sveta (11925/2/2008),
– having regard to the draft Council regulation (11925/2/2008),
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2008)0197 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2008)0197 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 66 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0189/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 66 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0189/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0352/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0352/2008 ),
Ta uredba začne veljati tretji dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Njena veljavnost se izteče z dnem, ki ga določi Svet v skladu s členom 55(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006.
It shall expire on the date to be fixed by the Council, acting in accordance with Article 55(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006.
Njena veljavnost se izteče z dnem, ki ga določi Svet v skladu s členom 55(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006, v vsakem primeru pa najpozneje 30. junija 2010 .
It shall expire on the date to be fixed by the Council, acting in accordance with Article 55(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 , and in any event no later than on 30 June 2010 .
Treba je izpolniti pogoje iz člena 55(2) uredbe 1987/2006 (vključno s tem, da bi moral biti Parlament obveščen o vseh rezultatih) in šele nato bi bilo treba opraviti migracijo podatkov, in sicer z enkratno migracijo.
The conditions stated on artº 55(2) of Regulation 1987/2006), should be fulfilled (inclusive the fact that the European Parliament should be informed of all the results) and only after that, the migration of the data should take place, in one-shoot migration.
Migracija s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) (uredba)
Migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 6/2008 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008
on Draft amending budget No 6/2008 of the European Union for the financial year 2008
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 6/2008 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008, Oddelek III – Komisija
on Draft amending budget No 6/2008 of the European Union for the financial year 2008, Section III – Commission
1. (v nadaljevanju "finančna uredba), zlasti členov 37 in 38,
1. (hereinafter "the Financial Regulation"), and particularly Articles 37 and 38 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2008 za proračunsko leto 2008, ki ga je Komisija predložila 1. julija 2008 ( KOM(2008)0429 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 6/2008 of the European Union for the financial year 2008, which the Commission presented on 1 July 2008 ( COM(2008)0429 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun (A6-03532008),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0353/2008 ),
A. ker predlog spremembe proračuna št. 6 k splošnemu proračunu za leto 2008 vključuje naslednje postavke:
A. whereas Draft amending budget No 6 to the general budget 2008 covers the following items:
– potrebne proračunske prilagoditve (kadrovski načrt), ki izhajajo iz podaljšana pooblastil za tri izvajalske agencije: Izvajalska agencija za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno in kulturo (EACEA), Izvajalska agencija za program javnega zdravja (PHEA) in Izvajalska agencija za vseevropska prometna omrežja (TEN -T EA),
– the necessary budgetary adaptations (establishment plan) arising from the extension of the mandate of three executive agencies: the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA), the Executive Agency for the Public Health Programme (PHEA), and the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-T EA),
– vzpostavitev proračunske strukture, pomembne za vključitev Skupnega podjetja za gorivne celice in vodik (FCH JU), in dodelitev ustreznih proračunskih potreb,
– the creation of the necessary budgetary structure to accommodate the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU), and allocation of the corresponding budgetary needs,
– povečanje odobritev za prevzem obveznosti za 2.200.000 EUR, da se pokrije del stroškov nove stavbe EUROJUST,
– an increase of EUR 2 200 000 in commitment appropriations, to cover part of the costs of a new building for EUROJUST,
– povečanje odobritev za prevzem obveznosti za 3.900.000 EUR za program za konkurenčnost in inovacije (CIP) – podjetništvo in inovacije,
– an increase of EUR 3 900 000 in commitment appropriations for the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) – Entrepreneurship and Innovation,
B. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 6/2008 uradna vključitev teh proračunskih sprememb v proračun za leto 2008,
B. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 6/2008 is to formally enter these budgetary adjustments into the 2008 budget,
3. pričakuje, da mu bo Komisija v prihodnje, če pride do nadaljnjih potreb po stavbah, te informacije predložila, da proračunski organ lahko pripravi mnenje skladno s členom 179(3) finančne uredbe;
Expects to be provided with such information by the Commission in the future, should any further needs for buildings arise, in order to allow the budgetary authority to issue an opinion under Article 179(3) of the Financial Regulation;
Glede posameznih točk predloga spremembe proračuna št. 6/2008 ima poročevalec naslednje pripombe:
Concerning the different points of Draft Amending Budget No 6/2008 your rapporteur has the following comments:
Ta del zadeva odprtje dveh dodatnih delovnih mest za začasno osebje razreda AD5 za Izvajalsko agencijo za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno in kulturo (EACEA), treh dodatnih mest za začasno osebje razreda AD5 in AD9 za Izvajalsko agencijo za program javnega zdravja (PHEA) in zmanjšanje iz 40 na 32 začasnih delovnih mest v kadrovskem načrtu Izvajalske agencije za vseevropska prometna omrežja (TEN -T EA).
This part concerns the creation of two additional posts of temporary agents of grade AD5 for the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) and the creation of three additional posts of temporary agents of grade AD5 and AD9 for the Executive Agency for the Public Health Programme (PHEA), and the reduction from 40 to 32 temporary posts in the establishment plan of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-T EA).
To se lahko odobri, saj bo imelo pozitiven vpliv na proračun (odprtje petih delovnih mest in hkrati zaprtje osmih delovnih mest).
It can be approved as it would have a positive effect on the budget (creation of five post, but deletion of eight posts).
Skupno podjetje za gorivne celice in vodik (FCH JU)
Fuel cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU)
Eurojust je zahteval povečanje proračunskih sredstev v višini 7,34 milijona EUR, da krije stroške najemnine, popravila in vzdrževanja nove stavbe v Haagu.
Eurojust has requested an increase in its budget of EUR 7,34 million in order to cover the rent, reparation and maintenance of a new office building in The Hague.
Komisija je pripravljena sprejeti 2,24 milijona EUR glede te zahteve, ki bodo na voljo s to spremembo proračuna.
The Commission is ready to accept EUR 2,24 millions of this request, to be provided by this Amending budget.
Komisija predlaga uporabo razlike do zgornje meje razdelka 3a za kritje potreb Eurojusta.
The Commission proposes to use the margin under the ceiling of Heading 3a for covering the needs of Eurojust.
Plačila pa se prerazporedijo iz neporabljenih odhodkov od poslovanja iz naslova 18 06 06 - Kazensko pravosodje.
As to the payments they shall be redeployed from unused operational expenditure of Title 18 06 06 -Criminal Justice-.
Evropski parlament mora Komisija obvestiti, da lahko pripravi mnenje o proračunskih posledicah projekta gradnje.
EP should be informed by the Commission in order to be put into a position to be able to issue an opinion on the budgetary impact of the building project.
Program za konkurenčnost in inovacije (CIP)
Competitiveness and innovation Programme (CIP)
Predlagano je povečanje sredstev za prevzem obveznosti za vrstico 01 04 04 - program CIP za 3,9 milijona EUR, ki bo nadomeščen z zmanjšanjem v finančnem načrtovanju v isti vrstici za leti 2011 in 2012.
It is proposed to increase commitments for line 01 04 04 - CIP programme by EUR 3,9 million, which would be compensated by a reduction in the financial programming on the same line in 2011 and 2012.
Poročevalec se s tem predlogom lahko strinja.
Your rapporteur can agree to this proposal.
Neto učinek sprememb odhodkov v spremembi proračuna št. 6/2008 je povečanje sredstev za prevzem obveznosti v višini 6,14 milijona EUR, pri odobritvah plačil pa ni sprememb.
The net effect of the modifications to expenditure in Amending Budget N° 6/2008 is an increase of EUR 6,14 million in commitment appropriations, with no change in payment appropriations.
Proračun 2008+PS1-4, PPSP 5
2008 Budget+AB1-4, PDAB 5
PPSP 6
PDAB 6
Novi zneski
New amounts
Skupaj obveznosti
CA Total
Skupaj plačila
Pa Total
Skupaj plačila
PA Total
Program za konkurenčnost in inovacije — Program za podjetništvo in inovacije
Competitiveness and Innovation Programme - Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Sodelovanje ­– Energija – Skupno podjetje za gorivne celice in vodik (FCH)
Cooperation — Energy — Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH)
Sodelovanje ­– Energija – Skupno podjetje za gorivne celice in vodik (FCH)
Cooperation — Energy — Support expenditure for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH)
EUROJUST — Subvencija iz naslovov 1 in 2
EUROJUST - Subsidy under titles 1 and 2
EUROJUST — Subvencija iz naslovov 1 in 3
EUROJUST - Subsidy under titles 1 and 3
Kazensko pravosodje
Criminal Justice
Prerazporejeni zneski po sprejetju predloga spremembe proračuna 6/2008 skupaj so:
In total the redeployed figures after adoption of DAB 6/2008 would be as follows:
Na koncu poročevalec priporoča, da se ga sprejme nespremenjenega.
In conclusion, your rapporteur recommends to adopt it unamended.
Predlog spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2006 za proračunsko leto 2008
Draft amending budget No 6/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2008
o strategiji za prihodnje reševanje institucionalnih vidikov regulativnih agencij
on a strategy for the future settlement of the institutional aspects of Regulatory Agencies
Pripravljavka mnenja(*):
Rapporteur for opinion (*):
Jutta Haug , Odbor za proračun
Jutta Haug , Committee on Budgets
(*) Pridruženi odbor – člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committee – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
PRILOGA – SEZNAM AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE IN PREGLEDNA TABELA O DOLŽNOSTIH EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA 15
ANNEX - LIST OF EUROPEAN UNION AGENCIES AND SUMMARY OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES 15
MNENJE Odbora za proračun (*) ...............................................................................18
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets (*) ............................................................18
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor .............................................................23
OPINION of the Committee on Budgetary Control ........................................23
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................27
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............27
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................31
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............31
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU ...................................................................37
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................37
o strategiji za prihodnje reševanje institucionalnih vidikov regulativnih agencij
on a strategy for the future settlement of the institutional aspects of regulatory agencies
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. marca 2008 z naslovom „Evropske agencije – smernice za prihodnost” ( KOM(2008)0135 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 11 March 2008 entitled 'European Agencies - the way forward' ( COM(2008)0135 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. januarja 2004 o sporočilu Komisije: o skupnem okviru za evropske regulativne agencije”
– having regard to its resolution of 13 January 2004 on the Communication from the Commission: 'The operating framework for the European Regulatory Agencies'
– ob upoštevanju osnutka medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 25. februarja 2005 o skupnem okviru za evropske regulativne agencije ( KOM(2005)0059 ),
– having regard to the draft interinstitutional agreement of 25 February 2005 on the operating framework for the European regulatory agencies ( COM(2005)0059 ),
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja za ustni dogovor, ki sta ga Svetu skupaj zastavila Odbor za ustavne zadeve in Odbor za proračun, in odgovora Sveta na zasedanju dne 15. novembra 2005 ( O-0093/05 ),
– having regard to the oral question with debate submitted jointly to the Council by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the Committee on Budgets, and to the answer given by the Council in plenary on 15 November 2005 ( O-0093/05 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. decembra 2005 o osnutku medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o skupnem okviru za evropske regulativne agencije
– having regard to its resolution of 1 December 2005 on the draft interinstitutional agreement presented by the Commission on the operating framework for the European regulatory agencies
– ob upoštevanju sklepa, ki ga je 17. aprila 2007 sprejela konferenc predsednikov,
– having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 17 April 2008,
– ob upoštevanju pisma, ki ga je v zvezi z ustanovitvijo medinstitucionalne delovne skupine na politični ravni predsednik Komisije poslal predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta in predsedujočemu Svetu 7. maja 2008,
– having regard to the letter of 7 May 2008 from the President of the Commission to the President of the European Parliament and to the President-in-Office of the Council on setting up an interinstitutional working group at political level,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za proračun, Odbora za proračunski nadzor, Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6‑0354/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Budgetary Control, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0354/2008 ),