natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem delovnem postopku za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, še posebej z njegovo 4. točko, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala 24. aprila 2007, da bi preučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predstavila Komisija.
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular of paragraph 4 thereof, the consultative working party of the legal services of Parliament, the Council and the Commission held a meeting on 24 April 2007 to consider the aforementioned proposal, submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je na srečanju preučila predlog direktive
Upon considering the proposal for a directive
V prvem odstavku člena 7 bi morala izrazu "z direktivami, navedenimi v Prilogi III," slediti navedba "Del A".
In the first paragraph of Article 7, the expression ‘ the Directives listed in Annex III ’ should be followed by the words ‘ Part A ’.
V Prilogi I, točka 1.3, bi se morala navedba "2.4" glasiti "2.1.1".
In Annex I, paragraph 1.3, the number ‘ 2.4 ’ should be ‘ 2.1.1 ’.
Ugotovitev glede Priloge I, točke 4.5.4.2, ne zadeva slovenske različice.
[ Does not affect English version ].
V Prilogi I, točka 4.15, bi treba črto, ki sedaj združuje točke od 4.15.3 do 4.15.9, nadomestiti z dvema različnima označbama, in sicer bi ena združevala točke od 4.15.3 do 4.15.6 pod navedbo "Ni posameznih zahtev" , druga pa točke 4.15.7, 4.15.8 in 4.15.9 pod navedbo "Z drugimi svetilkami".
In Annex I, paragraph 4.15, the line which currently groups together paragraphs 4.15.3 to 4.15.9 should be replaced by two separate lines, one grouping together paragraphs 4.15.3 to 4.15.6, marked ‘ No individual specifications ’, and the other grouping together paragraphs 4.15.7, 4.15.8 and 4.15.9, marked ‘ with another lamp ’.
pravni svetovalec generalni direktor
Jurisconsult Director-General
o četrtem poročilu o gospodarski in socialni koheziji
on the fourth report on economic and social cohesion
– ob upoštevanju četrtega poročila o gospodarski in socialni koheziji ( KOM(2007)0273 ) („četrto kohezijsko poročilo“),
– having regard to the Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion ( COM(2007)0273 ) (‘the Fourth Cohesion Report'),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru ter Odboru regij z naslovom „Strategija za najbolj oddaljene regije: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi“ ( KOM(2007)0507 ),
- having regard to the Commission communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled Strategy for the Outermost Regions: Achievements and Future Prospects ( COM(2007)0507 ),
- ob upoštevanju členov 158, 159 in 299(2) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
- having regard to Articles 158, 159 and 299(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
– ob upoštevanju teritorialne agende EU in leipziške listine o trajnostnih evropskih mestih ter prvega akcijskega programa za izvajanje teritorialne agende Evropske unije,
– having regard to the Territorial Agenda of the EUand the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities, and the First Action Programme for the Implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju študije evropskega omrežja za spremljanje prostorskega razvoja (EPSON) z naslovom „Prihodnost ozemlja – teritorialni scenariji za Evropo“ in študije Evropskega parlamenta „Regionalna neskladja in kohezija: strategije za prihodnost?“,
– having regard to the report by the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) entitled Territorial Futures - Spatial scenarios for Europe and that of the European Parliament Regional Disparities and Cohesion: what Strategies for the Future?,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij (COTER–IV–011) z 28. novembra in mnenja Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora (CESE 1712/2007) z 12. decembra o četrtem kohezijskem poročilu,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (COTER-IV-011) of 28 November 2007 and that of the European Economic and Social Committee (CESE 1712/2007) of 12 December 2007 on the Fourth Cohesion Report,
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 in člena 112(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 45 and 112(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenja Odbora za proračun in Odbora za ribištvo (A6 0023/2008),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0023/2008 ),
A. ker celovita evropska kohezijska politika ostaja nujna, saj se v številnih evropskih regijah še vedno pojavljajo precejšnja neskladja in specifične strukturne težave, stanje pa se je z zadnjo širitvijo Unije še poslabšalo,
A. whereas a comprehensive European cohesion policy continues to be made necessary by the persistence of major disparities and specific structural problems in numerous European regions, a situation that has been aggravated by the recent enlargement of the Union,
B. ker zato kohezijska politika Unije ostaja osnova, na kateri temelji postopek evropske integracije, in ima zelo pomembno vlogo pri zmanjševanju neskladij in razlik v razvoju,
B. whereas the EU’s cohesion policy thus remains an essential pillar in the process of European integration, and plays an active role in reducing disparities and development deficits,
C. ker je naraščanje evroskepticizma jasno povezano z vse večjimi ozemeljskimi neskladji med regijami in v njih, kar kaže na potrebo po gospodarski, socialni in ozemeljski koheziji, da se okrepi konvergenca in utrdi legitimnost Evropske unije, to pa zahteva dejansko vidno regionalno politiko; ker imajo regionalne in lokalne oblasti ter lokalni akterji osrednjo vlogo pri približevanju dejavnosti Evropske unije ljudem in izvajanju te politike, katere dosežke je treba učinkoviteje objavljati,
C. whereas there is a clear link between rising Euro-scepticism and the increase in territorial disparities between and inside regions, which demonstrates the need for economic, social and territorial cohesion in order to strengthen convergence and give a firm basis to the legitimacy of the European Union, which is achievable through a regional policy that is visible on the ground; whereas regional and local authorities and local actors have a central role to play in bringing the EU's activities closer to the people and in implementing regional policy, whose achievements should be publicised more effectively,
D. ker kohezijska politika vsaki regiji omogoča, da ima konkretne koristi v smislu dolgoročnega zaposlovanja in višjega življenjskega standarda za lokalno prebivalstvo, zlasti v regijah, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, ter prispeva k povečanju konkurenčnosti, krepitvi upravnih zmogljivosti in zagotavljanju decentraliziranega upravljanja; ker je zaradi tega treba onemogočiti vse poskuse ponovne nacionalizacije te politike,
D. whereas cohesion policy offers every region the possibility of concrete benefits in terms of long-term employment and higher living standards for local populations, particularly in regions that are lagging behindand contributes to strengthening competitiveness and administrative capacity and ensuring decentralised management; whereas, in the light of this, any attempt to renationalise this policy must be rejected,
E. ker lizbonska pogodba, ki so jo voditelji držav in vlad potrdili 18. oktobra 2007, podpisali pa 13. decembra 2007, poleg gospodarske in socialne kohezije med temeljne cilje Unije postavlja tudi ozemeljsko kohezijo,
E. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon, which was approved by the Heads of State and Government on 18 October 2007 and signed on 13 December 2007, enshrines territorial cohesion among the fundamental objectives of the Union, alongside economic and social cohesion,
F. ker je treba v prihodnje zagotoviti večja finančna sredstva za kohezijsko politiko, da bi se spoprijeli s pričakovanimi novimi izzivi, ki imajo močan ozemeljski vpliv, kot so demografske spremembe, ločevanje, koncentracija prebivalstva v mestih, ločevanje, migracije (ki so zlasti težavne za podeželje in obrobna območja), prilagajanje globalizaciji, podnebne spremembe, oskrba z energijo in počasno zmanjševanje zaostanka podeželja; ker se je s temi izzivi mogoče spoprijeti le, če se prizna velik pomen, ki ga bo imela kohezijska politika na tem področju v prihodnosti;
F. whereas increased financial resources for cohesion policy must be guaranteed in the future in order to deal with the anticipated new challenges, which have an important territorial impact, such as demographic change, urban concentration, segregation, migratory movements (which are particularly problematic for rural and peripheral areas), adjustment to globalisation, climate change, energy supply, and the slow catch-up process of rural areas; whereas these challenges can be dealt with only if the great significance of cohesion policy is recognised for this purpose in the future;
Mešani rezultati glede stanja kohezije v Evropski uniji 27 držav članic
Contrasting data on the state of cohesion in the European Union of 27 Member States
3. opozarja na zamude pri prevzemanju strukturnih sredstev v državah članicah in poziva k ukrepom za izboljšanje razmer; vendar ugotavlja, da je še prezgodaj za oceno rezultatov kohezijske politike v novih državah članicah; pozdravlja vsa prizadevanja za povečanje učinkovitosti kohezijske politike in zmanjšanje odvečne birokracije ter poziva k sistematični oceni te politike;
Points to the delays in taking up structural appropriations in Member States and calls for measures to improve the situation; notes however that it is too early to evaluate the results of cohesion policy in the new Member States; welcomes all efforts to enhance the effectiveness of cohesion policy and to reduce excessive bureaucracy and calls for a systematic assessment of this policy;
Grčija, Španija, Portugalska in Irska, presenetljivo uspešno nadomestile zamujeno in v letih 2000–2006 zabeležile izredno stopnjo rasti, vendar poudarja, da kljub tej rasti ostajajo nerešena precejšnja medregionalna neravnovesja in globoke strukturne težave;
Welcomes the fact that the former cohesion countries, namely Greece, Spain, Portugal and Ireland, have caught up remarkably well, recording impressive growth rates during the period 2000‑2006, but points out that, in spite of their growth, there are still major imbalances between their regions and deep-seated structural problems;
6. izraža zadovoljstvo, ker je Komisija ponovno potrdila pomembno vlogo kohezijske politike za krepitev sposobnosti vseh držav članic, da se skladno razvijajo ter ustvarjajo nova in trajna delovna mesta, kar dokazujejo odlični rezultati kohezijske politike v več regijah cilja 2;
Welcomes the reaffirmation by the Commission of the important role played by cohesion policy in strengthening the ability of all Member States to develop harmoniously and create new and viable jobs, as evidenced by the excellent results of cohesion policy in many Objective 2 regions;
9. v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da se nekatere razvite in celo nekatere manj razvite regije srečujejo z vse številčnejšimi težavami, ki imajo močan ozemeljski vpliv v smislu razvojnega potenciala: nizka stopnja gospodarske rasti, upad proizvodnje in zaposlovanja ter staranje prebivalstva;
Notes in this connection that some developed regions and even some less developed regions are beginning to experience multiple problems having strong territorial impact in terms of development potential: low economic growth rates, falling productivity and employment, and ageing populations,
12. poudarja pomen vključevanja načela enakosti med spoloma, enakih možnosti in posebnih potreb invalidov in starejših državljanov na vsaki stopnji izvajanja projektov kohezijske politike;
Stresses the importance of integrating gender mainstreaming, equal opportunities and the special needs of persons with disabilities and senior citizens at every stage in the implementation of cohesion policy projects;
16. je zelo presenečen nad izjavo Komisije v četrtem kohezijskem poročilu, da „sama otoška lega ne predstavlja glavne ovire za razvoj“, ter opaža veliko razočaranje ljudi na otoških območjih nad to izjavo, ker se zaradi lege dnevno srečujejo z negativnimi vplivi in težavami;
Expresses its great surprise at the Commission's statement in the Fourth Cohesion Report that 'insularity does not seem to constitute in itself a major obstacle to development' and notes the strong disappointment of the people of island regions with that statement, for the reason that they are confronted on a daily basis with the negative impacts and difficulties of insularity,
Regionalna politika in lizbonska strategija
Regional policy and the Lisbon Strategy
18. se strinja s stališčem Komisije, da kohezijska politika z usmerjanjem javnih naložb v projekte za oblikovanje bolj dinamičnega gospodarskega tkiva, ki ustvarja rast in spodbuja inovacije, na podlagi sinergije, ki nastaja zaradi učinkovitejšega usklajevanja politike in programov, pozitivno vpliva na lizbonsko strategijo;
Shares the opinion of the Commission on the leverage effect of cohesion policy vis-à-vis the Lisbon Strategy, which is achieved by virtue of the directing of public investments towards projects that favour the creation of a more dynamic, growth-generating, innovation-stimulating economic fabric based on synergy created by more efficient harmonisation of policies and programmes;
20. poudarja, da se pozitiven vpliv strukturne podpore lahko poveča z uporabo zasebnega sofinanciranja; zahteva nemoteno uvajanje preglednih predpisov in standardnih rešitev za javno-zasebna partnerstva, s čimer bo regijam omogočena uporaba zasebnega kapitala pri doseganju javnih ciljev;
Points out that the leverage effect of structural support can be increased through the use of private co-financing; calls for the swift introduction of transparent rules and standard solutions for public-private partnerships that will enable regions to bring private capital to bear in pursuit of public objectives;
22. opozarja, da so zamude pri izvajanju strukturne politike deloma nastale zaradi prestrogih postopkov in bi zato bilo treba razmisliti o njihovi poenostavitvi ter o jasni razdelitvi odgovornosti in pristojnosti med Evropsko unijo in državami članicami;
Points out that the delays in implementing structural policy are due in part to the excessive rigidity of procedures and that, consequently, consideration should be given to simplifying those procedures and clearly dividing responsibilities and competences between the EU and the Member States;
24. zahteva, da se v lizbonsko strategijo vključi tudi ozemeljska razsežnost, kar bo omogočilo upoštevanje značilnosti posameznih regij, spodbudilo vseevropsko sinergijo in sodelovanje, s posebno podporo oblikovanju in izvajanju široko zasnovanih inovativnih dejavnosti;
Calls for the Lisbon Strategy to be broadened to include the territorial dimension, allowing characteristics specific to the regions to be taken into account, while encouraging trans-European synergies and cooperation, with special support for the creation and implementation of broad-based innovative activities;
Teritorialna kohezija: za celovit pristop
Territorial cohesion: towards an integrated approach
30. predlaga, da se prednost nameni politikam za resnični policentrični razvoj ozemlja, s čimer bi se zmanjšal pritisk na glavna mesta in spodbudil nastanek drugotnih polov; meni, da se v tej zvezi ne sme spregledati podpore podeželju in pomembne vloge, ki jo imajo tam mala in srednje velika mesta;
Proposes that priority be given to policies that serve a genuinely polycentric development of territories, such that the pressures on capital cities are lessened and the emergence of secondary poles is encouraged; considers that support for rural areas and the important role played by small and medium-sized towns located in rural areas should not be overlooked in this connection;
33. opozarja na nevarnost razdelitve politik na sektorje in podpira oblikovanje celovitega pristopa, opredeljuje možno sinergijo med kohezijsko politiko in osrednjimi sektorskimi politikami, kot so promet, kmetijstvo, ribištvo, razvoj podeželja, okolje in energetika ter raziskave in tehnologija;
Warns against the dangers of the sectorisation of policies and favours the development of an integrated approach that identifies the synergies that are possible between cohesion policy and major sectoral policies such as transport, agriculture, fisheries, rural development, environment and energy, research and technology;
37. izraža zadovoljstvo nad tem, da je Komisija napovedala objavo zelene knjige o ozemeljski koheziji, ki naj bi bila sprejeta septembra 2008, in se zavzema, da bi zelena knjiga obsegala konkretne rešitve za celovit pristop;
Welcomes the announcement by the Commission of a future Green Paper on territorial cohesion, which is expected to be adopted in September 2008, and asks that it should contain concrete guidelines for the implementation of the integrated approach;
39. se zaveda pomena rednega sodelovanja med Evropskim parlamentom, ki ga predstavlja Odbor za regionalni razvoj, in Odborom regij na temo prihodnosti regionalne politike;
Is aware of the importance of regular cooperation between Parliament, represented by its Committee on Regional Development, and the Committee of the Regions on the subject of the future of regional policy;
Novi izzivi za kohezijsko politiko in splošni proračun Evropske unije
New challenges for cohesion policy and the general budget of the European Union
41. poziva k rednim analizam stroškov in posledic pričakovanih širitev na strukturno politiko pred začetkom vseh pristopnih pogajanj ter upa, da bo lahko prevzel večjo vlogo pri širitvi in sosedski politiki ter sodeloval pri oblikovanju predpristopnih instrumentov, ki bodo zavezujoči;
Calls for regular analyses of the costs and structural-policy implications of pending enlargements before the start of any new accession negotiations and hopes that it can play a greater part in the enlargement and neighbourhood policies, with its participation in the shaping of pre-accession instruments to be made binding;
45. opozarja tudi, da je v okviru oblikovanja učinkovite svetovne politike za zagotovitev zaščite pred naravnimi nesrečami pomembno sprejeti predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije ( KOM(2005)0108 ), ki na regionalni ravni zagotavlja pravočasen in ustrezen odziv na naravne nesreče, ki določene regije pogosto hudo prizadenejo zaradi njihove zemljepisne lege;
Recalls also within the framework of the formulation of an effective global policy to provide protection from natural disasters the importance of adopting the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund ( COM(2005)0108 ), which provides a more timely and adequate response to natural disasters of regional scale, which are often devastating in certain regions because of their geographical situation;
Kohezija je s prizadevanjem za zmanjšanje gospodarskih in družbenih neskladij med evropskimi regijami temeljni cilj Evropske unije.
Cohesion, the aim of which is to reduce the economic and social disparities between European regions, is a fundamental objective of the European Union.
Že več kot dvajset let se regionalna politika izvaja z namenom doseči harmoničen in trajnostni razvoj vsega evropskega ozemlja.
For over 20 years already, the regional policy has been working to achieve harmonious, sustainable development of the whole of Europe’s territory.
Že več kot dvajset let se izvajajo programi in strukturne prilagoditve za odpravo razlik med regijami in izboljšanje življenjskih razmer vseh evropskih državljanov.
More than twenty years of programmes and structural adjustments to bring about convergence between increasingly diverse regions and improve the living conditions of all Europe’s citizens.
Po zadnji širitvi, s katero se je temeljito spremenila površina Unije, je za uspešno integracijo, pa tudi kot odgovor na vprašanja o smiselnosti EU, ki odzvanjajo po Evropi, in za novo vero evropskih državljanov v evropski projekt, nujno treba oživiti cilj ozemeljske kohezije.
After the latest enlargement, which profoundly changed the EU’s territorial dimension, there is a great necessity to revive the objective of territorial cohesion in order to make a success of integration, and also to respond to the crisis of meaning that is sweeping through Europe and to reconcile its citizens to the European project.
Parlament torej kot pozitivno ocenjuje to prvo poročilo o koheziji po širitvi leta 2004 in 2007.
Parliament therefore welcomes this first report on cohesion since the enlargements of 2004 and 2007.
Polovični uspeh za stanje konvergence v EU-27
Mixed verdict on the state of convergence in the EU of 27
Glede na podatke iz četrtega poročila se v obdobju 2000–2006 pri zbliževanju na nacionalni ravni kaže določen uspeh.
According to the data contained in the fourth report, the period from 2000 to 2006 has some success stories to show as regards convergence at national level.
Glavne upravičenke kohezije, Grčija, Španija, Irska in Portugalska, so dejansko zabeležile izjemno stopnjo rasti.
The main beneficiaries of cohesion – Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal - recorded impressive growth rates.
Število regij, kjer je BDP na prebivalca nižji od 75 % povprečja v EU, se je z 78 zmanjšalo na 70.
And the number of regions with a per-capita GDP lower than 75% of the EU average went down from 78 to 70.
A če upoštevamo zelo nizke ravni BDP na prebivalca, lahko ugotovimo, da imajo nove države članice kljub dinamični stopnji rasti številnejše težave kot stare.
Nonetheless, having started from very low per-capita GDP levels, and despite dynamic growth rates, more difficulties are recorded in the new Member States than in the old ones.
Glede na sedanjo stopnjo rasti je videti, da bodo Poljska, Bolgarija in Romunija potrebovale več kot 15 let , da bodo dosegle BDP na prebivalca v višini 75 % povprečja EU-27.
On the basis of current growth rates, it looks as if Poland, as well as Bulgaria and Romania, will take more than 15 years to reach a per-capita GDP of 75% of the EU-27 average.
Čeprav je med državami članicami v zadnjih letih prišlo do zbliževanja, pa se je vendarle poglobil razkorak v razvoju znotraj njih.
While narrowing of gaps between Member States has certainly progressed in recent years, the development gaps within Member States have widened.
Razkorak med regijami in njihovimi posameznimi deli je opazen na več področjih, naj bo to v zvezi z zaposlovanjem, produktivnostjo, prihodki, stopnjo izobrazbe ali inovativno sposobnostjo.
The widening of regional and infraregional disparities can be observed in a number of areas, whether in terms of employment, productivity, income, education levels or innovation capacity.
Celo nekatere najrazvitejše regije začenjajo beležiti zelo nizko ali kar negativno stopnjo rasti.
Some of the most developed regions are even beginning to experience very weak, or even negative, growth rates.
Tako ugotavljamo, da je med letoma 1995 in 2004 produktivnost upadla v 29 regijah Italije, Francije, Španije in Nemčije, v 16 regijah pa se je zmanjšala zaposlenost, predvsem v vzhodnem delu Nemčije, severovzhodni Franciji in severni Angliji.
It is noted that between 1995 and 2004 productivity has fallen in 29 regions in Italy, France, Spain and Germany, while employment rates have fallen in 16 regions, essentially in the eastern part of Germany, the north-east of France and the north of England.
Te regije se bodo morale prilagoditi pritiskom svetovne trgovine ter razviti inovativno in tehnološko visoko razvito gospodarstvo.
These regions will have to adapt to the pressures of world trade by developing innovative, high-technology economies.
Pogosto te regije najbolj občutijo tudi posledice demografskih sprememb in zlasti staranja prebivalstva.
Often these regions are also the most affected by demographic change, particularly the ageing of their populations.