natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zaradi zapletenosti in pomena vprašanja je prišlo med odborom za promet in odborom za pravne zadeve do spora o pristojnosti.
Due to the complexity and importance of the matter in hand, there was a dispute between the Committee on Transport and the Committee on Legal Affairs as to which committee was responsible.
Na koncu je bil na priporočilo konference predsednikov kot pristojni odbor imenovan odbor za promet, odbor za pravne zadeve in odbor za okolje pa sta pripravila osnutek mnenja, v katerem sta poročevalca povabila k tesnemu sodelovanju s pripravljavcema mnenja.
In the end, it was decided, following a recommendation from the Conference of Presidents, that the Committee on Transport should be appointed as the committee responsible and the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on the Environment should issue an opinion duly inviting the main rapporteur to work closely with the two rapporteurs for the opinion.
Poročevalec se je na priporočilo sestal s pripravljavcema mnenja iz odbora za pravne zadeve in odbora za okolja ter s poročevalci v senci, da bi jim pred predstavitvijo poročila pojasnil poglavitna vprašanja, ki so bila obravnavana, ter izrazil pripravljenost za sodelovanje ves čas zakonodajnega postopka.
As a result of this recommendation, the rapporteur held joint meetings with the rapporteurs for the opinion from the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on the Environment, as well as with the shadow rapporteurs so that they would be aware, before the report was presented, of the key questions the rapporteur intended asking, without prejudice to his willingness to engage in dialogue throughout the legislative procedure.
Nazadnje velja omeniti, da je bilo to vprašanje obravnavano tudi v razpravi odbora za peticije, saj je ta prejel peticijo o onesnaževanju z ladij.
Finally, it should be mentioned that this matter has also been the subject of debate in the Committee on Petitions as a petition on ship‑source pollution has been received.
Predlagatelji peticije upajo, da bo novi predlog direktive rešil resne težave, s katerimi se soočajo.
The petitioners hope that this new proposal for a directive may help to resolve the serious problem affecting them.
Pripombe in predlogi poročevalca
Considerations and rapporteur's proposals :
Predlog Komisije, ki je zelo realističen in previden, poskuša na razumen način zapolniti pravno vrzel, ki je nastala s sodbo Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 (zadeva C-176/03) in konkretneje s sodbo z dne 23. oktobra 2007 (zadeva C-440/05), ki je razveljavila okvirni sklep 2005/667/PNZ.
The Commission's proposal is very realistic and prudent, sensibly seeking to fill the legal vacuum created by the CJEC judgment of 13 September 2005 (Case C-176/03) and more specifically by the judgment of 23 October 2007 (Case C-440/05) which annulled Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA.
Poročevalec je dal predlogu pozitivno prvo oceno in meni, da ob nekaj pripombah, ki jih je podal v predlogih sprememb, zasluži podporo Parlamenta.
The rapporteur's initial asssessment of the proposal is positive, and he takes the view that it is worthy of receiving Parliament's support subject to certain observations detailed by the rapporteur in the amendments put forward.
Komisija se ni zadovoljila le s soglasjem, ki je bilo doseženo v razpravah in ob sprejetju direktive 2003/35/ES, temveč je uporabila tudi novo pravno podlago, saj je bila s sodbami dana zakonodajalcu Skupnosti možnost, da sprejme ukrepe v zvezi s kazenskim pravom držav članic.
The Commission has simply reiterated the consensus reached when Directive 2003/35/EC was debated and adopted, but has done so on a new legal basis, since the judgments mentioned make it possible for the Community legislator to take measures connected to the Member States' criminal law.
b) Sodbi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 13. septembra 2005 (zadeva C–176/03) in z dne 23. oktobra 2007 (zadeva C–440/05):
b) The judgments of 13 S eptemb e r 2005 ( Case C-176/03) and 23 O ct o b e r 2007 ( Case C ‑ 440/05) of the Court of Justice of the European Communities :
Čeprav je zaželeno, da Komisija pridobi pristojnosti na področju kazenskega prava z reformo pogodb in ne le prek sodne prakse, je pravno nesporno, da dajeta sodbi Komisiji možnost sprejetja kazenskih ukrepov.
Although it would certainly have been preferable for the Commission to have acquired powers in criminal law matters through a reform of the Treaties rather than through case law, legally it cannot be denied that both judgments make it possible for the Community to adopt criminal law measures.
Je pa sodbi vendarle mogoče razlagati na omejevalen oziroma prikladen način.
This said, a restrictive or tight interpretation may be applied.
Poročevalec ne želi prve rešitve, vendar ne želi iti onstran strogih in izjemnih omejitev iz sodb.
The rapporteur refuses to endorse the first judgment but does not wish to move outside the strict and exceptional limits established by both judgments.
Ti na precej strog način določata pogoje izvajanja nove pristojnosti, in sicer pravita,
The judgments are fairly strict in laying down the conditions under which this new power can be exercised, namely:
da mora biti ukrep mora biti nujno potreben za boj proti resni škodi, prizadejani okolju.
- A requirement that the measure be essential for combating serious offences against the environment.
Poročevalec meni, da sistemi civilne odgovornosti, ki so se uporabljali v primeru onesnaževanja z ladij, niso dovolj odvračilni.
In the rapporteur's opinion, the civil liability systems governing ship‑source pollution in force at present are not sufficiently dissuasive.
Uskladitev, ki jo predlaga Komisija, je najmanj, kar je potrebno, da bi izpolnili cilj učinkovitega boja proti določenim problemom, kot je na področju zaščite okolja onesnaževanje z ladij, ki je očitno vprašanje evropskih razsežnosti.
- The harmonisation proposed by the Commission is the minimum needed to achieve the aim of effectively combating something specific such as ship‑source pollution in the context of protection of the environment, an issue with clear European dimensions.
c) Načelo subsidiarnosti
c) S ubsidiari ty principle :
Uporaba direktive kot pravnega instrumenta je popolnoma skladna z načelom subsidiarnosti, saj predvideva obveznost držav članic za njeno uresničitev, vseeno pa države lahko same izbirajo sredstva za to.
The use of a directive as a legal instrument fully complies with the subsidiarity principle as this implies that the Member States have an obligation as to the results thereof but are free to choose the means.
Poleg tega imajo države članice veliko manevrskega prostora pri prenosu direktive v domači pravni red.
Furthermore, it gives the Member States plenty of scope as regards implementation when they transpose the directive into their national legal system.
d) Ključna vprašanja v predlogih sprememb, ki jih je podal poročevalec
d) Keys points underpinning the rapporteur's amendments :
– Uravnotežena in stroga razlaga področja uporabe sodb Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 in 23. oktobra 2007.
- A balanced and strict interpretation of the scope of the CJEC judgments of 13 September 2005 and 23 October 2007.
– Ocena – na ravni Skupnosti – o tem, da obstoječa ureditev, ki naj bi preprečevala onesnaževanje z ladij, ni delovala.
- An assessment at Community level that the existing regulations to deter ship‑source pollution have not worked.
Uporaba konvencije Marpol 73/78 v vseh državah članicah ni enaka, zaradi visokega števila ladij v vodah Skupnost pa vsak dan prihaja do kršenja predpisov, ne da bi bili ob tem sprejeti korektivni ukrepi.
The Member States do not enforce the Marpol 73/78 Convention equally, its rules are broken daily by the high number of ships sailing in Community waters, and no corrective measures are taken.
– Ločevanje med upravnimi sankcijami, s katerimi se kaznujejo nezakoniti izpusti onesnaževalnih snovi z ladij v morje manjšega obsega, kot jih opredeljuje konvencija Marpol 73/78, in kazenskimi sankcijami v primeru resnih kršitev, ki jih morajo države članice obravnavati kot kazniva dejanja v okoliščinah, ki so določene v predlogu direktive in ki ponovno uvajajo koncept, ki je bil poprej sprejet z okvirnim sklepom 2005/667/PNZ (ta je sedaj razveljavljen).
- To distinguish between administrative penalties that penalise illegal minor discharges of ship‑source polluting substances defined in the Marpol 73/78 Convention and criminal penalties for serious infringements that must be classed by Member States as criminal offences in those cases where the circumstances laid down in the proposal for a directive apply, reinstating a concept previously adopted in Framework Decision 667/2005/JHA, now annulled.
– Ponavljajoče se manjše kršitve, katerih posledica je hudo onesnaženje, se začnejo obravnavati kot kaznivo dejanje, če so bile storjene namerno, zaradi nepremišljenosti ali iz hude malomarnosti.
- To raise behaviour involving repeated minor infringements that cause serious pollution to the status of a criminal offence provided they are committed with intent, recklessly or through serious negligence.
Cilj je, da bi od kršitev odvrnili nekatere odgovorne v pomorskem prometu, ki se v praksi odločijo za nezakonita dejanja onesnaževanja, saj je ceneje, če plačajo upravno kazen, kot pa če bi spoštovali okoljsko zakonodajo.
The aim is to dissuade certain responsible parties in sea transport who find illegal pollution preferable in reality because paying the administrative penalty costs them less than complying with the relevant legislation.
S takšnimi dejanji staro načelo „onesnaževalec plača” spreminjajo v načelo „plačnik onesnažuje”.
This very common practice has transformed the former principle of ‘the polluter pays’ to ‘pay to pollute’.
– Razlikovanje med fizičnimi in pravnimi osebami, pri čemer bi se moralo za slednje zaradi zapletenosti in raznolikosti veljavnih zakonodaj v državah članicah uporabljati načelo subsidiarnosti.
- To distinguish between natural and legal persons, with subsidiarity applying to the latter on account of the complexity and diversity of legislation in Member States.
Potreba po novem predlogu spremembe obstoječe direktive proti onesnaževanju morja se je pojavila, ker je bilo treba zapolniti pravno praznino, nastalo zaradi zadevne odločitve Evropskega sodišča oktobra 2007.
The need for a new proposal to amend an existing directive against maritime pollution became necessary in order to fill a legal vacuum created by a relevant ruling of the European Court of Justice in October 2007.
S to odločitvijo je bil Okvirni sklep 2005/667/5HA o okrepitvi kazenskopravnega okvira za izvrševanje zakonodaje proti onesnaževanju morja z ladij razglašen za ničnega z utemeljitvijo, da bi njegove člene o opredelitvi kaznivega dejanja in narave sankcij (členi 2, 3 in 5) lahko sprejeli na podlagi člena 80(2) Pogodbe ES, in da je zato okvirni sklep s poseganjem v pristojnosti Skupnosti kršil člen 47 Pogodbe EU.
This ruling annulled Framework Decision 2005/667/5HA" to strengthen the criminal-law framework for the enforcement of the law against ship source pollution", on the grounds that its articles on the definition of the criminal offence and the nature of penalties (articles 2, 3 and 5) could have been adopted on the basis of Article 80 (2) of the EC Treaty and that, therefore, the Framework Decision violated Article 47 of the EU Treaty by encroaching upon the powers of the Community.
Predlagana spremenjena direktiva v celoti upošteva zgornjo odločitev Evropskega sodišča, zato se v zvezi njo ne bi smel več pojavljati problem pravne podlage.
The proposed amended Directive is fully guided by the ECJ decision above and is therefore thought no longer to suffer from a legal basis problem.
Osnutek mnenja Odbora za okolje:
The draft opinion of the Environmental Committee:
Poročevalec meni, da je predlog spremembe nesporno potreben za odpravo pravne praznine, ki se je zaradi odločitve Evropskega sodišča pojavila v zvezi z učinkovitim sankcioniranjem resnih kršitev po direktivi iz leta 2005.
The rapporteur considers the amending proposal to be indisputably necessary in order to remedy the legal vacuum created by the ECJ decision with regard to the effective sanctioning of infringements under the 2005 directive.
Pomembno je, da se omenjeno direktivo spremeni čimprej, saj bi zamuda pri izvajanju tako pomembnega dela zakonodaje EU lahko škodovala morskemu okolju.
It is important that the said Directive is amended as soon as possible because the delay in implementation of such an important piece of EU legislation could be to the detriment of our marine environment.
Morda bi bilo treba omeniti, da bi se takšni zamudi lahko izognili, če tisti, ki jih to zadeva, ne bi na začetku naredili napake pri pravni podlagi, ki je posledično privedla do odločitve Evropskega sodišča o razveljavitvi.
It should perhaps be noted that such a delay could have been avoided if those concerned did not, in the first place, commit the legal basis error which led to the consequent annulment decision by the ECJ.
Upamo, da se bomo v prihodnosti izognili takšnim primerom.
Hopefully such an occurrence will be avoided in the future.
Zaradi narave in okoliščin nastanka tega predloga poročevalec predlaga le minimalno število predlogov sprememb.
Due to the nature and the circumstances under which this proposal is made, the rapporteur suggests only a very minimal number of amendments.
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano poziva Odbor za promet in turizem kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(3) Kazenske sankcije, ki izražajo družbeno neodobravanje drugačne narave kot upravne sankcije, zelo povečajo skladnost z veljavno zakonodajo na področju onesnaževanja morja z ladij.
3) Criminal penalties, which demonstrate social disapproval of a different nature than administrative sanctions greatly enhance compliance with the legislation against ship-source pollution in force.
(4) Skupna pravila za kazenske sankcije omogočajo uporabo učinkovitejših preiskovalnih metod in učinkovitega sodelovanja znotraj držav članic ter med njimi.
4) Common rules on criminal penalties make it possible to use more effective methods of investigation and effective cooperation within and between Member States.
(1a) V členu 1(1) se besede „v členu 8“ nadomestijo z „v členu 5a in členu 5c ter ukrepih glede odgovornosti iz člena 5b te direktive“.
(1a) In Article 1(1) the words “in Article 8” shall be replaced by “in Articles 5a and 5c and measures of liability as referred to in Article 5b of this Directive”.
Direktiva 2000/35/ES
Directive 2000/35/EC
Države članice zagotovijo, da se izpusti onesnaževalnih snovi z ladij na katerem koli območju iz člena 3(1) obravnavajo kot kaznivo dejanje, če so bili povzročeni naklepno, iz zavestne ali nezavestne malomarnosti.
Member States shall ensure that ship-source discharges of polluting substances into any of the areas referred to in Article 3(1) are regarded as criminal offences if committed with intent, recklessly or with serious negligence.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se izpusti onesnaževalnih snovi z ladij na katerem koli območju iz člena 3(1) obravnavajo kot kaznivo dejanje, če so bili povzročeni naklepno, iz nepremišljenosti ali iz malomarnosti.
Member States shall ensure that ship-source discharges of polluting substances into any of the areas referred to in Article 3(1) are regarded as criminal offences if committed with intent, recklessly or with negligence.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se napeljevanje h kaznivim dejanjem iz odstavka 1 oziroma pomoč ali podpora pri njih obravnava kot kaznivo po kazenskem pravu.“.
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that inciting or aiding and abetting a criminal offence referred to in paragraph 1 is punishable by criminal law. ”
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se napeljevanje h kaznivim dejanjem iz odstavka 1 oziroma pomoč ali podpora pri njih ustrezno obravnava kot kaznivo po kazenskem pravu.“.
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that inciting or aiding and abetting a criminal offence referred to in paragraph 1 is adequately punishable by criminal law. ”
za Odbor za transport in turizem
for the Committee on Transport and Tourism
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/35/ES o onesnaževanju morja z ladij in uvedbi kazni za kršitve
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2005/35/EC on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za transport in turizem kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednji predlogi spremembe:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendment in its report:
Obstoječi sistem sankcij za nezakonite izpuste z ladij, ki dopolnjuje to zakonodajo, je treba dodatno okrepiti z uvedbo kazenskih sankcij za vsak nezakonit izpust.
The existing system of sanctions for illegal ship-source discharges supplementing that legislation needs to be further strengthened by the introduction of criminal penalties for any illegal discharge.
o delu skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU v letu 2008
on the work of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly in 2008
– ob upoštevanju partnerskega sporazuma med člani skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (AKP) na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, ki je bil podpisan v Cotonouju 23. junija 2000
– having regard to the partnership agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific group of states (ACP), of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (Cotonou Agreement)
– ob upoštevanju poslovnika skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU (SPS), sprejetega 3. aprila 2003
– having regard to the Rules of Procedure of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (JPA), adopted on 3 April 2003
68. , kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen v Port Moresbyju (Papua Nova Gvineja) 28. novembra 2008
68. , as most recently amended in Port Moresby (Papua New Guinea) on 28 November 2008
– ob upoštevanju izjave iz Kigalija (Ruanda) o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu za razvoj, ki jo je SPS sprejela 22. novembra 2007
– having regard to the Kigali Declaration on development-friendly Economic Partnership Agreements
– ob upoštevanju izjave iz Port Moresbyja o svetovni finančni in prehrambeni krizi, ki jo je SPS sprejela 28. novembra 2008,
– having regard to the Port Moresby Declaration on the global food and financial crises, adopted by the JPA on 28 November 2008 in Port Moresby,
- ob upoštevanju resolucij, ki jih je SPS sprejela leta 2008:
– having regard to the resolutions adopted by the JPA in 2008:
· o družbenih in okoljskih posledicah programov za strukturno prilagajanje
· on the social and environmental consequences of structural adjustment programmes
· o izkušnjah procesa evropskega regionalnega povezovanja glede držav AKP
· on experiences from the European regional integration process relevant to ACP countries
UL C 271, 25.10.2008, str.
OJ C 271, 25.10.2008, p.
· o varnosti pri preskrbi s hrano v državah AKP in vlogi sodelovanja AKP-EU
· on food security issues in ACP countries and the role of ACP-EU cooperation
· o razmerah v Keniji
· on the situation in Kenya
· o zaščiti civilistov med mirovnimi operacijami Združenih narodov in regionalnih organizacij
· on the protection of civilians during peacekeeping operations by the UN and regional organisations
· o učinkovitosti pomoči in opredelitvi uradne razvojne pomoči
· on aid effectiveness and defining official development assistance
· o družbenih posledicah dela otrok in strategijah za boj proti njemu
· on the social consequences of child labour and strategies to combat child labour
· o razmerah v Mavretaniji
· on the situation in Mauritania
· o razmerah v Zimbabveju
· on the situation in Zimbabwe
– ob upoštevanju sporočila, ki je bilo sprejeto v Windhoeku (Namibija) 29. aprila 2008
– having regard to the Windhoek Communiqué adopted on 29 April 2008 in Windhoek (Namibia)
– ob upoštevanju sporočila, ki je bilo sprejeto v Port Vilu (Vanuatu) 1. decembra 2008
– having regard to the Port Vila Communiqué adopted on 1 December 2008 in Port Vila (Vanuatu)
– ob upoštevanju izjave predsedstva SPS z dne 25. novembra 2008 o francoskem predsedstvu EU
– having regard to the JPA Bureau declaration of 25 November 2008 on the French EU Presidency
– ob upoštevanju evropskega soglasja o humanitarni pomoči, podpisanega 18. decembra 2007
– having regard to the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid signed on 18 December 2007
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0081/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0081/2009 ),
A. ker so bili leta 2008 podpisani sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu z nekaterimi regijami ali državami AKP, marca 2008 pa so v Ljubljani in novembra 2008 v Port Moresbyju v okviru SPS potekale razprave o napredku pogajanj glede sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu,
A. having regard to the EPAs signed with some ACP regions or countries during the course of 2008 and to the JPA debates in March 2008 in Ljubljana (Slovenia) and November 2008 in Port Moresby on the latest developments in the EPA negotiations,
B. ker sta Parlament in Svet sprejela uredbo (ES) št. 1905/2006, ki predvideva tematske programe, ki bodo veljali tudi za države AKP, ter program spremljevalnih ukrepov za države AKP, ki so podpisnice protokola o sladkorju,
B. whereas Parliament and the Council have adopted Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006, which provides for thematic programmes also applicable to ACP countries and a programme of accompanying measures for Sugar Protocol countries,
C. ker se je komisar, pristojen za razvoj in humanitarno pomoč, med zasedanjem SPS v Wiesbadnu junija 2007 zavezal, da bo nacionalne in regionalne strateške dokumente za države AKP (za obdobje 2008–2013) predložil parlamentom v demokratično preučitev, Parlament pa izraža zadovoljstvo, da se je ta zaveza udejanjila,
C. whereas the Commissioner with responsibility for development and humanitarian aid gave an undertaking at the JPA session in Wiesbaden (Germany) in June 2007 to subject Country and Regional Strategy Papers for the ACP countries (2008-2013) to democratic scrutiny by parliaments; welcoming the fact that that undertaking has been fulfilled,
D. ker je nova revizija sporazuma iz Cotonouja, predvidena za leto 2010, pomembna priložnost za razvoj regionalne razsežnosti SPS in parlamentarnega nadzora na ravni regij AKP, pa tudi za okrepitev vloge in dejavnosti same institucije SPS,
D. whereas the fresh revision of the Cotonou Agreement scheduled for 2010 provides a valuable opportunity to enhance the JPA's regional dimension and develop parliamentary scrutiny in ACP regions, as well as to strengthen the JPA’s own role and activities,
E. ker sta bili regionalni srečanji SPS, ki sta leta 2008 potekali v Namibiji in Vanuatuju ter na podlagi katerih sta bili sprejeti zgoraj navedeni sporočili iz Windhoeka in Port Vila, zelo uspešni,
E. whereas the two JPA regional meetings held in Namibia and Vanuatu in 2008 were a considerable success and resulted in the adoption of the abovementioned Windhoek and Port Vila communiqués,
F. ker so se razmere v Zimbabveju kljub izvedbi volitev julija 2008 v tem letu še poslabšale, vendar kljub temu pozdravlja dosežen sporazum o sprejetju resolucije o Zimbabveju na šestnajstem zasedanju SPS v Port Moresbyju,
F. whereas the situation in Zimbabwe deteriorated still further in 2008, despite the holding of elections in July 2008; welcoming, nonetheless, the agreement which led to the adoption of a resolution on Zimbabwe at the 16th JPA session in Port Moresby,