natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
7. meni, da bi moral biti glavni cilj javnih organov ustvarjanje pogojev, ki zagotavljajo visoko kakovost medijev (vključno s pogoji za javne medije), medijsko raznolikost in popolno neodvisnost novinarjev;
Believes that the main objectives of public authorities should be to create conditions that ensure a high level of media quality (including those of the public media), secure media diversity and guarantee the full independence of journalists;
14. meni, da bi morala pravila o koncentraciji medijev poleg lastništva in proizvajanja medijskih vsebin urejati tudi (elektronske) kanale ter mehanizme dostopa in razširjanja vsebin na internetu, na primer iskalnike,
Considers that the rules on media concentration should govern not only the ownership and production of media content, but also the (electronic) channels and mechanisms for access to and dissemination of content on the Internet, such as search engines.
23. predlaga, da je pri vsebinah, ki jih za komercialne publikacije in kanale oblikujejo uporabniki, treba spodbujati upoštevanje etičnih kodeksov in pogojev uporabe ter uvesti avtorske honorarje, skladne s komercialno vrednostjo;
Suggests that for private-user-generated content in commercial publications and channels, ethical codes of conduct and terms of usage should be encouraged and royalties, commensurate with its commercial value, should be introduced;
26. podpira zaščito avtorskih pravic na ravni spletnih medijev, v katerih morajo tretje strani, kadar navajajo izjave, navesti njihov vir;
Supports the protection of copyrights at the level of online media, the third parties having to mention the source when taking over declarations;
28. vztraja, da mora biti namen medijskega izobraževanja državljanom omogočiti, da bodo lahko kritično presojali in uporabljali vedno večji obseg posredovanih informacij, kakor je omenjeno v priporočilu Sveta Evrope 1466 (2000); meni, da bo takšen učni proces državljanom omogočil, da bodo lahko oblikovali sporočila in izbrali najprimernejši medij za njihovo posredovanje, s čimer bodo v celoti uveljavljali svoje pravice v zvezi s svobodo obveščanja in izražanja;
Maintains that the purpose of media education must be, as is laid down in Council of Europe Recommendation 1466 (2000), to provide citizens with the means of bringing critical interpretation to bear on, and utilising, the ever growing volume of information being imparted to them; considers that this learning process will thus enable citizens to formulate messages and select the most appropriate media for communicating them, and hence to exercise their rights to the full where freedom of information and expression is concerned;
36. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj podprejo večje sodelovanje med evropskimi regulativnimi organi ter okrepijo uradne in neuradne razprave ter izmenjave mnenj med regulativnimi organi na področju radiofuzije;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support greater co-operation between European regulatory authorities and to intensify the formal and informal discussions and exchanges of views between regulatory authorities in the broadcasting field;
39. spodbuja države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bo uporaba nacionalnega konkurenčnega prava za medije, pa tudi za internetni sektor in sektor komunikacijske tehnologije, olajšala in spodbudila pluralizem medijev; poziva Komisijo, da pri izvajanju pravil o konkurenci EU upošteva njihov vpliv na pluralizem medijev;
39. encourages the Member States to ensure that the application of national competition law to the media as well as to the Internet and communication technology sector facilitates and promotes media pluralism; calls on the Commission, in implementing EU competition rules, to take account of the impact thereof on media pluralism;
42. priporoča Komisiji uporabo postopka revizije sporočila ES o radiodifuziji, če se ji to zdi primerno, kot načina za krepitev pomembne vloge zagotavljanja pluralizma medijev v EU, ki jo ima storitev javne radiodifuzije;
Recommends that the Commission use the process of revising the EC Broadcasting Communication - if it considers it necessary - as a way to strengthen public service broadcasting as an important guarantor of media pluralism in the EU;
To mora kot del pristojnosti storitev javne radiodifuzije vključevati tudi ustrezno financiranje;
This should also include adequate funding for new services as part of the public service broadcasting remit;
Poleg tega morajo države članice še naprej imeti odgovornost pri odločanju o dodeljevanju frekvenc, da zadovoljijo posebne potrebe svojih družb, zlasti v zvezi z zaščito in spodbujanjem pluralizma medijev;
Additionally, Member States should remain responsible to decide on frequency allocation to serve the specific needs of their societies in particular with respect to safeguarding and promoting media pluralism;
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0497 . , saj je medobratovalnost bistvena za zagotavljanje pluralizma medijev;
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0497 . , as interoperability is of fundamental importance for media pluralism;
53. meni, da uredbe na ravni EU v zadostni meri zagotavljajo dostopnost elektronskih programskih vodnikov in podobnih pripomočkov za pregled ter iskanje, vendar se lahko preučijo dodatni ukrepi v zvezi s tem, kako so predstavljene informacije o razpoložljivih programih, da se zagotovi enostavna dostopnost storitev splošnega interesa; poziva Komisijo, naj s postopki posvetovanja ugotovi, ali so za zagotovitev pluralizma medijev potrebne minimalne smernice ali sektorska zakonodaja;
Considers that regulation at EU level sufficiently safeguards the accessibility of electronic programme guides and similar overview and navigation facilities, but that further action could be considered with regard to the way that information about the available programmes is presented to ensure that services of general interest are easily accessible; calls on the Commission to ascertain by means of consultative procedures whether minimal guidelines or sector-specific regulation are needed to safeguard media pluralism;
Članstvo v EU se je od leta 2004 skoraj podvojilo.
EU membership has almost doubled since the beginning of 2004.
Eden največjih izzivov po širitvi je težnja, da se približevanje standardov za varovanje demokracije in temeljnih svoboščin zagotovi na najvišji ravni.
Ensuring the convergence of standards for the protection of democracy and basic freedoms towards the highest existing levels is one of the main post-enlargement challenges.
Tako se v poročilu pozdravljajo vse pobude, namenjene varovanju demokracije, in poudarja, da so mediji še vedno vplivno politično orodje, ki ga ne bi smeli obravnavati le z ekonomskimi merili.
In this context, the report welcomes all initiatives aimed at safeguarding democracy and points out that the media remains an influential political tool, which should not be treated solely on economic terms.
V poročilu se priznava odločitev Evropske komisije, da bo zaupala opredelitev zanesljivih in nepristranskih kazalnikov pluralizma medijev konzorciju treh evropskih univerz.
The report recognises the decision of the European Commission to entrust determining the reliable and impartial indicators of media pluralism to a consortium of 3 European universities.
Poleg tega je poudarjeno, da bi bilo treba institucionalizirati sisteme za spremljanje in izvajanje na podlagi tako opredeljenih kazalnikov.
In addition, this report stresses the need to institute the monitoring and implementation systems based on the indicators thus determined.
Del teh potrebnih sistemov so medijski varuhi človekovih pravic.
Media ombudsmen are seen as a part of the necessary systems.
V poročilu je izraženo tudi priznanje nenehnim prizadevanjem predstavnikov izdajateljev in novinarjev, da bi oblikovali listino medijske svobode.
The report also recognises the ongoing efforts of publishers' and journalists' representatives to create a charter of media freedom.
Poleg tega je poudarjeno, da je treba novinarjem in urednikom zagotoviti socialna in pravna jamstva.
In addition, the report underscores the need for social and legal guarantees for journalists and editors.
V poročilu se zagovarja, naj večnacionalna podjetja sprejmejo najboljšo prakso glede uredniške in novinarske svobode v vseh državah, kjer delujejo.
The report advocates the adoption by the multinational enterprises of the best practice for editorial and journalistic freedom in each country where they operate.
Izražena je zaskrbljenost nad tem, da so v državah članicah, ki so pristopile k EU leta 2004 in 2007, standardi nižji.
It expresses concern over lower standards being applied in the member states acceded to the EU in 2004 and 2007.
Razvoj in sprejemanje nove tehnologije sta privedla do nastanka novih sredstev obveščanja in novih vsebin.
The development and acceptance of new technologies have led to the emergence of new media channels and new kinds of content.
Nastanek novih sredstev obveščanja je na medijsko prizorišče vnesel več dinamike in raznolikosti; poročilo spodbuja odgovorno uporabo novih sredstev.
The emergence of new media has brought more dynamic and diversity into the media landscape; the report encourages responsible use of new channels.
Glede tega je tudi poudarjeno, da neopredeljeni in nenakazani status avtorjev in izdajateljev spletnih dnevnikov povzroča nejasnost glede nepristranskosti, varovanja virov, uporabe etičnih kodeksov in odgovornosti v primeru tožbe.
In this context the report points out that the undetermined and unindicated status of authors and publishers of weblogs causes uncertainties regarding impartiality, reliability, source protection, applicability of ethical codes and the assignment of liability in the event of lawsuits.
Priporočeno je, naj se razjasni pravni status različnih kategorij avtorjev in izdajateljev spletnih dnevnikov, pa tudi, naj se razkrijejo interesi za spletne dnevnike in naj se označijo.
It recommends clarification of the legal status of different categories of weblog authors and publishers as well as disclosure of interests and voluntary labelling of weblogs.
Ugotovljeno je tudi, da se čedalje več uporablja nominalno plačilo za vsebine, ki jih oblikujejo uporabniki v komercialnih publikacijah in da to sproža vprašanja v zvezi z zasebnostjo in konkurenco.
The report acknowledges the spreading use for a nominal fee of user-generated content by the commercial publications and the privacy and competition issues this generates.
Priporoča se nadomestilo za neprofesionalce, ki bi ustrezalo proizvedeni komercialni vrednosti in pri katerem bi uporabili etične kodekse za zaščito zasebnosti zasebnikov in javnih osebnosti.
It recommends compensating non-professionals commensurately to the commercial value they generate and using ethical codes to protect the privacy of citizens and public figures.
V poročilu se priznava, da so tiskovne hiše pred izzivom, ko se dobički od reklamiranja selijo na internet, vendar je poudarjeno tudi, da na novem komercialnem medijskem prizorišču prevladujejo uveljavljeni javni in zasebni ponudniki medijskih vsebin.
The report acknowledges the challenges posed to the print outlets by the migration of the advertising revenues to the internet but points out that new commercial media landscape is dominated by the established public and private media content providers.
V poročilu je izraženo stališče, da se koncentracija medijskega lastništva približuje ravni, ko sile prostega trga ne zagotavljajo pluralizma medijev , zlasti v novih državah članicah.
It also takes the standpoint that the concentration of media ownership is approaching levels where the media pluralism is not guaranteed by the forces of the free market, especially in the new member states.
Poročilo priznava, da mediji kot javne službe potrebujejo obsežen in trden tržni delež, če naj opravijo svojo nalogo, vendar tudi poziva, da se je treba izogibati nepošteni konkurenci in težnji k čim večjemu tržnemu deležu zaradi njega samega.
The report recognises that the public service media needs a sizable and stable market share to fulfil its mission but urges it to avoid unfair competition and pursuit of the market share for its own sake.
Poudarjeno je, da so mediji kot javne službe večinoma premalo financirani in doživljajo politični pritisk, čeprav so na nekaterih trgih največji udeleženec na trgu.
It point out that whereas in certain markets the public service media is a leading market participant, it mostly suffers from inadequate funding and political pressure.
Poročilo tudi priznava, da je treba povečati medijsko pismenost, priporoča njeno uvrstitev med devet osnovnih zmožnosti in podpira razvoj evropskega temeljnega učnega načrta za medijsko pismenost.
Finally the report recognises the need to increase media literacy in the EU, recommends the inclusion of media literacy among the 9 basic competences and supports the development of the European core curriculum for media literacy.
1. je trdno prepričan, da je pluralističen sistem medijev bistveni pogoj za nadaljnji obstoj demokratičnega evropskega modela družbe;
Firmly believes that a pluralistic media system is an essential requirement for the continued existence of the democratic European social model;
6. meni, da bi moral biti glavni cilj javnih organov ustvarjanje pogojev, ki zagotavljajo visoko kakovost medijev (vključno s pogoji za javne medije), medijsko raznolikost in popolno neodvisnost novinarjev;
Believes that the main objectives of public authorities should be to create conditions that ensure a high level of media quality (including those of the public media), secure media diversity and guarantee the full independence of journalists;
13. meni, da bi morala pravila o koncentraciji medijev poleg lastništva in proizvajanja medijskih vsebin urejati tudi (elektronske) kanale in mehanizme dostopa in razširjanja vsebin na internetu, na primer iskalnike.
Considers that the rules on media concentration should govern not only the ownership and production of media content, but also the (electronic) channels and mechanisms for access to and dissemination of content on the Internet, such as search engines.
A. ker lahko infrastrukturna ozka grla ogrožajo medijski pluralizem, ki ga morajo nacionalni regulativni organi ustrezno nadzorovati, kot je določeno v telekomunikacijskem paketu,
A. whereas infrastructure bottlenecks can be a threat to media pluralism and whereas effective monitoring by the national regulatory bodies, as specified in the telecom package, is essential for dealing with media pluralism,
B. ker zaradi tehnoloških sprememb založniki časopisov vse bolj razširjajo vsebine prek interneta in so zato zelo odvisni od prihodkov od (spletnega) oglaševanja,
B. whereas due to technological developments, newspaper publishers are increasingly disseminating content via the Internet and are therefore largely dependent on (online) advertising revenue,
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0497 . , saj je medobratovalnost bistvena za zagotavljanje medijskega pluralizma;
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0497 . , as interoperability is of fundamental importance for media pluralism;
6. je zaskrbljen zaradi prevlade nekaterih velikih spletnih akterjev, kar omejuje nove udeležence na trgu ter tako ovira ustvarjalnost in podjetništvo v tem sektorju;
Is concerned about the dominance of a few large online players, which restricts new market entrants and thereby stifles creativity and entrepreneurship in this sector;
10. meni, da uredbe na ravni EU v zadostni meri zagotavljajo dostopnost elektronskih programskih vodnikov in podobnih pripomočkov za pregled ter iskanje, vendar se lahko preučijo dodatni ukrepi v zvezi s tem, kako so predstavljene informacije o razpoložljivih programih, da se zagotovi enostavna dostopnost storitev splošnega interesa; poziva Komisijo, naj s postopki posvetovanja ugotovi, ali so za zagotovitev medijskega pluralizma potrebne minimalne smernice ali sektorska zakonodaja;
Considers that regulation at EU level sufficiently safeguards the accessibility of electronic programme guides and similar overview and navigation facilities, but that further action could be considered with regard to the way the information about the available programmes is presented to ensure that services of general interest are easily accessible; calls on the Commission to ascertain by means of consultative procedures whether minimal guidelines or sector-specific regulation are needed to safeguard media pluralism;
A. ker je Evropski parlament večkrat izrazil željo, da bi Komisija oblikovala trden pravni okvir na področju medijev in v informacijski družbi kot celoti, da se zagotovi ustrezna raven zaščite pluralizma v državah članicah ter se gospodarskim subjektom omogoči, da izkoristijo priložnosti, ki jih ustvarja enotni trg,
A. whereas Parliament has repeatedly expressed its view that the Commission should establish a stable legal framework, both in the media and in the information society as a whole, aimed at ensuring an equivalent level of protection of pluralism in the Member States and enabling operators to benefit from the opportunities created by the single market,
B. ker je pluralizem medijev bistven del pravice do svobode izražanja in obveščanja, ki je vključena v člen 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
B. whereas media pluralism is a basic pillar of the right to freedom of expression and information under Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
C. ker pojma pluralizma medijev ni mogoče omejiti na težavo koncentracije lastništva podjetij, ampak vključuje tudi vprašanja, ki zadevajo storitve javne radiodifuzije, politično moč, gospodarsko konkurenco, kulturno raznolikost, razvoj nove tehnologije, preglednost in delovne razmere novinarjev v Evropski uniji, kot je poudarila Komisija v svojem delovnem dokumentu,
C. whereas, as the Commission stressed in its working document, the concept of media pluralism cannot be limited to the issue of concentration of ownership of companies, but also includes issues related to public broadcasting services, political power, competition in the economy, cultural diversity, the development of new technologies, transparency, and the working conditions of journalists in the Union,
D. ker razlike med nacionalnimi zakonodajami na področju koncentracije medijev negativno vplivajo na delovanje notranjega trga, na kar Evropski parlament opozarja od leta 1995, medtem ko je te posledice treba odpraviti z direktivo za uskladitev nacionalnih določb v smislu člena 95 Pogodbe o ES,
D. whereas, as Parliament has been warning since 1995, the variations in national law regarding media concentration have adverse consequences for the workings of the single market, and those consequences need to be eliminated by means of a directive for the harmonisation of national provisions within the meaning of Article 95 of the EC Treaty,
E. ker v praksi temeljno načelo svobodnega pošiljanja in sprejemanja informacij pogosto ovira vmešavanje javne oblasti,
E. whereas in practice public authorities frequently tamper with the basic principle of the free transmission and reception of information,
F. ker morajo imeti storitve javne radiodifuzije na voljo potrebna sredstva in instrumente, ki jim zagotavljajo dejansko neodvisnost od političnega pritiska in tržnih sil,
F. whereas public broadcasting services need to have the necessary resources and institutions to allow them to be genuinely independent of political pressures and market forces,
G. ker storitve javne radiodifuzije zdaj nepremišljeno, brez cilja in na račun kakovosti vsebine svojega programa tekmujejo s komercialnimi postajami, da bi si zagotovile tržni delež, pri čemer cilj dejansko ni kakovost, ampak izpolnjevanje pričakovanj večine,
G. whereas as things stand public broadcasting services are under pressure, unjustifiably and to the detriment of content quality, to compete for ratings with commercial channels, whose objective is ultimately not quality but satisfaction of majority public taste,
1. poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za oblikovanje stalnega pravnega okvira, ki bi zagotovil visoko stopnjo zaščite pluralizma v vseh državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to commit itself to promoting a stable legal framework with a guaranteed high standard of protection of pluralism in all the Member States;
5. opozarja države članice, da si morajo pri odločitvah nacionalnih regulativnih organov prizadevati za ravnovesje med njihovimi dolžnostmi in svobodo izražanja, katere varstvo je ne nazadnje odgovornost sodišč;
Reminds the Member States that a balance must always be sought, in the decisions of the national regulatory authorities, between their duties and freedom of expression, the protection of which is ultimately the responsibility of the courts;
8. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj podprejo večje sodelovanje med evropskimi regulativnimi organi ter okrepijo uradne in neuradne razprave in izmenjave mnenj med regulativnimi organi na področju radiofuzije;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support greater co-operation between European regulatory authorities and to intensify the formal and informal discussions and exchanges of views between regulatory authorities in the broadcasting field;
o izboljšanju kakovosti izobraževanja učiteljev
on improving the quality of teacher education
– ob upoštevanju členov 38(q), 149 in 150 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 3(q), 149 and 150 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Izboljšanje kakovosti izobraževanja učiteljev ( KOM(2007)0392 ) ter s tem povezanih dokumentov služb Komisije ( SEC(2007)0931 in SEC(2007)0933 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Improving the Quality of Teacher Education' ( COM(2007)0392 ) and to the related Commission staff working papers ( SEC(2007)0931 and SEC (2007)0933),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1720/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. novembra 2006 o uvedbi akcijskega programa na področju vseživljenjskega učenja
– having regard to Decision No 1720/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning
– ob upoštevanju osmih ključnih znanj, ki jih določa priporočilo 2006/962/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 z naslovom Ključne kompetence za vseživljenjsko učenje – evropski referenčni okvir
– having regard to the eight key skills set out in Recommendation 2006/962/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 entitled 'Key Competences for lifelong learning - A European Reference Framework'
– ob upoštevanju 10-letnega delovnega programa „Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2010“, zlasti cilja 1.1 „Izboljšanje izobraževanja in usposabljanja za učitelje in vodje usposabljanj“
– having regard to the 10-year 'Education and Training 2010' work programme and specifically to Objective 1.1 'Improving Education and Training for Teachers and Trainers'
– ob upoštevanju politike večjezičnosti EU in poročila skupine Komisije na visoki ravni o večjezičnosti (2007),
– having regard to the EU's multilingualism policy and to the Commission's High Level Group Report on Multilingualism (2007),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov posebnega zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Lizboni z dne 23. in 24. marca 2000,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Lisbon Special European Council of 23-24 March 2000,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Barceloni marca 2002, na katerem so bili med drugim sprejeti konkretni cilji za izboljšanje izobraževanja in usposabljanja za učitelje in vodje usposabljanj,
– having regard to the Barcelona European Council Conclusions in March 2002, which adopted concrete objectives for improving, among others, education and training for teachers and trainers,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 5. maja 2003 o referenčnih ravneh povprečne evropske storilnosti v izobraževanju in usposabljanju (merila uspešnosti)
– having regard to the Council Conclusions of 5 May 2003 on reference levels of European average performance in education and training (Benchmarks)
UL C 134, 7.6.2003, str.
OJ C 134, 7.6.2003, p.3 ,
UL C 300, 12.12.2007, str.
OJ C 300, 12.12.2007, p.6 ,