natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2. ne razume zamude Komisije, ki je sporočilo objavila šele 9. februarja 2011, čeprav bi ga morala objaviti najpozneje leta 2010, in izraža razočaranje zaradi pomanjkljivosti tega sporočila z vidika sedanjih izzivov, zlasti sedanje gospodarske krize, sredstev, ki jih je še treba porabiti v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa, itd.;
Fails to understand the delay on the part of the Commission, which published its communication on 9 February 2011 although it had an obligation to do so no later than 2010, and regrets the weakness of the Commission communication in view of current challenges, particularly the current economic crisis situation, the sums remaining to be committed under the FP7 etc.;
7. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj povečajo svoja komunikacijska prizadevanja v zvezi s 7OP (tudi z uporabo novih tehnologij, na primer pametnih raziskovalnih informacijskih storitev), z lažjim dostopom do informacij o udeležbi, z objavo prihodnjih raziskovalnih izzivov in razširjanjem rezultatov raziskav; podpira pobude Komisije, ki spodbujajo odprt dostop do rezultatov javno financiranih raziskav, kjer je to ustrezno in izvedljivo glede na pravice intelektualne lastnine;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to boost up their communication efforts regarding FP7 (including through the use of new technologies, such as smart research information services), facilitating access to information on participation, announcing forthcoming research challenges, and disseminating of research findings; supports the Commission's initiatives to promote open access to the results of publicly funded research, where relevant and feasible in relation to intellectual property rights;
13. predlaga okrepitev skupnih raziskav, na primer dejavnosti, ki se financirajo v posebnem programu Sodelovanje; poziva k možnosti oblikovanja manjših in srednje velikih projektov in partnerskih konzorcijev, ki bi omogočali učinkovito usklajevanje in hkrati okrepili znanstveno odličnost; poudarja, da mora pristop na podlagi skupnih raziskav ostati osrednji element okvirnega programa;
Proposes the reinforcement of collaborative research such as the activities funded in the specific programme ‘Cooperation’; calls for the possibility of forming smaller and medium sized projects and partner consortia that allow efficient coordination, in addition to strengthening scientific excellence; stresses that the collaborative research approach must remain the core element of the Framework Programme;
16. meni, da je treba za povečanje kadrovskih virov, ki se v Evropi ukvarjajo z raziskavami, poskrbeti, da bodo poklicne možnosti na tem področju privlačnejše, tako da se odpravijo upravne ovire ter priznajo zasluge ter čas usposabljanja in dela v katerem koli raziskovalnem centru; v ta namen spodbuja Komisijo in države članice, naj vzpostavijo skupen sistem za vrednotenje odličnosti in poklicne poti raziskovalcev ter uspešnosti posameznih univerz; ponovno poudarja, da je pomembno vlagati v izobraževanje, usposabljanje in razvoj znanj ter dopolniti povezave med izobraževanjem, raziskavami in inovacijami;
Considers that in order to increase the human resources dedicated to research in Europe, it is necessary to make professional careers in this field more attractive by eliminating administrative barriers and recognising merit and training time and work at any research centre; to this end, encourages the Commission and Member States to establish a common system to evaluate the researchers’ excellence and career, as well as to assess universities’ performance; reaffirms the importance of investing in education, training and skills development and complementing the linkages between education, research and innovation;
21. meni, da je treba zlasti glede na strategijo 2020 in cilj „pametne rasti“ določiti skupna raziskovalna področja med tistimi, ki obetajo največ z vidika konkretne uporabe, kar bo omogočilo visoko raven izmenjave v etičnem okviru; poudarja, da bi takšna področja lahko tvorila skupno raziskovalno platformo, ki bi jo financirala EU, podprta pa bi bila s skupnim omrežjem za izmenjavo podatkov, kar je treba obravnavati kot zelo pomemben prednostni interes;
Believes that given, notably, the EU 2020 strategy and the objective of ‘intelligent growth’, it is necessary to identify common research areas among those which appear most promising in terms of concrete applications enabling the highest extent of sharing in an ethical context; points out that such areas could form part of a common research platform financed by the EU and supported by a common network for data exchange, which should be treated as being of major importance and priority interest;
24. poudarja pomen neposrednih dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča in njihov prispevek k trajnostnemu razvoju, konkurenčnosti, zaščiti in varnosti jedrske energije;
Underlines the importance of the direct actions of the Joint Research Centre and their contribution to sustainable development, competitiveness and the security and safety of nuclear energy;
28. poudarja, da ni videti, da bi bila stopnja udeležbe industrije večja v primerjavi s prejšnjimi okvirnimi programi, zlasti v delu „Sodelovanje“; zato poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi podrobno analizo zmogljivosti tega dela, da bi bolje vključila naložbe zasebnega sektorja;
Stresses that industry’s participation rates do not appear any higher than in previous FPs, particularly under the ‘Cooperation’ chapter; thus calls on the Commission to carry out a detailed analysis of the Programme’s capacity to better leverage private sector investment;
31. meni, da je treba spodbuditi sodelovanje mladih znanstvenikov v projektnih skupinah v okviru dejavnosti skupnih raziskav industrije in znanstvenih organizacij; poziva, naj Komisija in države članice sprejmejo konkretne ukrepe za povečanje sodelovanja mladih raziskovalcev v okvirnih programih; poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi vmesni pregled sedmega okvirnega programa za spodbujanje zaposlovanja mladih znanstvenikov, in sicer s takšnim oblikovanjem pravil in načinov sodelovanja, da bo znaten del sredstev namenjen zaposlovanju mladih raziskovalcev;
Believes that the participation of young scientists in project teams in the context of collaborative research activities by industry and science organisation should be incentivated; calls for the Commission and the Member States to take specific measures designed to increase the participation of young researchers in the framework programmes; calls on the Commission to use the mid-term review of the Seventh Framework Programme to promote the employment of young scientists by designing the rules and modes of participation in such a way as to devote a substantial portion of funding for hiring young researchers;
35. meni, da je treba programe odpreti za mednarodne partnerje; poudarja, da bi moralo biti osnovno načelo, da so vsi programi odprti za financiranje tudi tujih skupin (glede na posebne kompetence); zavrača zamisel, da bi bilo primerneje, da bi sodelujoče partnerje namesto raziskovalcev izbrala Komisija;
Believes that the programmes should be opened up to international partners; highlights that the basic principle should be that all programmes should be open for financing also of foreign groupings (given specific competencies); rejects the notion that the Commission would be better placed than researchers to determine the choice of cooperation partners;
38. meni, da bi morala biti poraba sedmega okvirnega programa, pa tudi splošna raziskovalna usmeritev, kolikor mogoče skladna s splošnimi političnimi cilji strategije EU 2020; meni, da znanstveni napredek na področju velikih izzivov zahteva srednje- do dolgoročno dodelitev instrumentov financiranja, ki podpirajo tako temeljne raziskave kot sodelovanje z industrijo in drugimi zunanjimi partnerji;
Believes that FP7 spending, as well as the overall research orientation, should be aligned as far as possible with the overarching policy objectives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy; believes that scientific progress on grand challenges requires medium to long-term commitment of funding instruments that support both fundamental research and collaboration with industry and other external partners;
40. meni, da bi morali upravičenci za financiranje raziskovalne infrastrukture jasno obrazložiti svojo vlogo in uporabo opreme, laboratorijev in raziskovalnega ali tehničnega osebja; zato meni, da je treba oblikovati sistem za spremljanje in nadzor, ki bi preverjal skladnost sporazumov;
Considers that the beneficiaries of research infrastructure financing should clearly justify their role and their use of the equipment, laboratories and research or technical staff; to this end, believes that a monitoring and inspection system which verify compliance of the agreements should be created;
Vloga inovacij
Role of innovation
45. meni, da bi sedmi in prihodnji osmi okvirni program morala več prispevati k razvoju industrije v Evropi, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo uporabne raziskave;
Believes that both FP7 and the future FP8 should make a greater contribution to the development of industry in Europe, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage applied research;
Spremljanje ukrepov za poenostavitev
Follow-up to simplification measures
49. ponavlja, da je pomembno v sedanje upravljanje sedmega okvirnega programa takoj uvesti postopkovne, upravne in finančne ukrepe za poenostavitev, kot so bili opredeljeni v resoluciji Parlamenta z dne 11. novembra 2010; pozdravlja sklep Komisije z dne 24. januarja 2011, ki uvaja tri ukrepe za poenostavitev, ter oblikovanje enotnega instrumenta za registracijo; poziva Komisijo, naj te ukrepe hitro in poenoteno izvede in naj preuči, kjer so tovrstni ukrepi še mogoči; obžaluje velike težave glede razlage in pravno negotovost udeležencev sedmega okvirnega programa in znova izraža željo, da bi se potekajoči sodni postopki med Komisijo in upravičenci vseh okvirnih programov rešili hitro in ob spoštovanju načela odgovornega upravljanja javnih sredstev; poziva Komisijo, naj upravičencem med projektom ali po njem omogoči posvetovanje z odborom za raziskovalna vprašanja, da se pojasnijo vprašanja glede izračuna stroškov, pravil za sodelovanje in revizije, vključno z naknadnimi revizijami; poudarja, da je treba ohraniti vse, kar deluje, in spremeniti le tista pravila, ki jih je treba prilagoditi;
Reiterates the importance of introducing, without delay, procedural, administrative and financial simplification measures into current management of FP7, such as those identified in Parliament’s resolution of 11 November 2010; welcomes the Commission Decision of 24 January 2011 introducing three simplification measures, as well as the creation of the Unique Registration Facility; calls on the Commission to rapidly implement these measures in a uniform way and to investigate where additional simplification measures are still possible; regrets the serious problems of interpretation and legal uncertainty for the participants of FP7 and reiterates its wish to see current legal proceedings between the Commission and beneficiaries across all of the framework programmes settled quickly, while respecting the principle of responsible management of public money; asks the Commission to allow beneficiaries to consult the Research Clearing Committee during or after a project to clarify issues related to cost calculation, rules for participation and audits, including ex-post audits; stresses the need to preserve what works well and only change the rules which need to be adapted;
51. pozdravlja priporočila za skrajšanje trajanja postopka javnega razpisa in poziva k oceni obstoječih instrumentov, preden bi v sedmem okvirnem programu oblikovali morebitne nove instrumente;
Warmly welcomes the recommendations to shorten the timeframe for adjudication and calls for an evaluation of existing instruments before the creation of any new instruments within the framework of FP7;
54. vseeno izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi nezadostnih sredstev, dodeljenih raziskovalnim infrastrukturam, univerzam in raziskovalnim institucijam ter malim in srednjim podjetjem, zlasti inovativnim, ter zaradi znanega geografskega in sektorskega neravnovesja pri dodeljenih posojilih; zato podpira konkretna priporočila strokovne skupine za izboljšanje udeležbe nekaterih ciljnih skupin, ki niso zadostno zastopane, in odobrava sklepe Evropskega sveta z dne 4. februarja 2011, zlasti poziv, naj se preučijo vsi možni ukrepi za ovrednotenje pravic intelektualne lastnine na evropski ravni, predvsem zato, da bi malim in srednjim podjetjem olajšali dostop do trga znanja;
Expresses concern, however, in the light of the derisory sums allocated to research infrastructures, universities and research bodies and SMEs, in particular innovative SMEs, and also given the acknowledged geographical and sectoral imbalance in loans allocated; supports, therefore, the specific recommendations made by the expert group aimed at improving participation of certain under-represented target groups, and endorses the European Council’s conclusions of 4 February 2011, especially its call for all possible options to be explored with a view to the valorisation of intellectual property rights at the European level, in particular to ease SMEs’ access to the knowledge market;
Splošni sklep in prihodnja usmeritev
Overall conclusion and future orientations
61. poudarja, da je pomembno upoštevati ocene doseženih rezultatov na vseh področjih, ki so opredeljena kot politične prednostne naloge za financiranje, in njihovo učinkovitost, da se izboljša ocena prihodnjih programov;
Stresses that it is important to consider the assessment of the results obtained in each of the areas defined as political priorities for funding, and how effective they were, in order to improve the evaluation of future programmes;
Uskladiti znanost in državljane
Reconciling science and the citizen
„ Naše 21. stoletje nam ponuja nenavadno protislovje: pred nas postavlja velike znanstvene izzive, vplivi znanosti in tehnologije so navzoči povsod v našem vsakdanjem življenju, pa vendar se znanost še nikoli ni zdela tako oddaljena, nedostopna in skrb vzbujajoča,“ je dejala Claudie Haigneré, predsednica ustanove Universcience, nekdanja francoska ministrica za raziskave (2002–2004) in nekdanja ministrica za evropske zadeve (2004–2005), zdravnica in astronavtka
‘ This 21st Century offers us a curious paradox: it poses major scientific challenges and the impact of science and technology is felt throughout our daily lives, and yet the sciences have never seemed so distant, inaccessible and troubling ’ - Claudie Haigneré, President of universcience, former Minister for Research (2002-2004) and former Minister for European Affairs (2004-2005) of the French Republic, doctor and astronaut.
Evropski svet, ki se je 23. in 24. marca 2000 sestal v Lizboni, je za Evropsko unijo določil velikopotezen strateški cilj: da bi do leta 2010 postala najbolj konkurenčno in dinamično na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu.
On 23 and 24 March 2000, the European Council, meeting in Lisbon, set the European Union (EU) an ambitious strategic objective: to become, by 2010, the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world.
V tej strategiji je bila priznana osrednja vloga raziskav.
The central role played by research in this strategy has been acknowledged.
Ta cilj se je zdel 15 uglednim državam, ki so sestavljale Unijo, uresničljiv; nekatere od njih se z nostalgijo spominjajo svojega izginulega imperija, zato so v EU videle upanje za novo družbo.
Such an objective seemed within the reach of the 15 States that made up the Union, some of which, nostalgic for their vanished empire, saw in the EU hope for a new society.
Ta tako imenovana lizbonska strategija je bila neuspešna, Unija pa ni resnično analizirala vzrokov za to.
This strategy, termed the ‘Lisbon Strategy’, has been a failure without the Union having really analysed the reasons why.
Ali so krive države, ki ne spoštujejo sprejetih evropskih zavez?
Was it the fault of the States, which failed to meet the European commitments they had signed up to?
Ali so krivi narodi, ki se ne počutijo dovolj povezani, za kar morajo elite drago plačati?
Was it the fault of the peoples, who did not feel sufficiently involved and would make the elites pay dearly for that?
Ali so krive elite, ki niso razumele želje narodov, da bi razumeli pomen predlaganega?
Was it the fault of the elites, who had not understood people’s hunger to understand the meaning of what they were being offered?
Ali je šlo za nasprotujoča si političnih dejanja, večja od moči Unije in njenih članic?
Was it the force of contrary political events, which outweighed that of the Union and its members?
Zgodovinarji bodo morali razvozlati, kaj se je zgodilo v težavnem desetletju 2000–2010; ko je bilo verjetno konec obdobja miru, blaginje in bratstva evropskih narodov, ki se je začelo po drugi svetovni vojni ter končalo s padcem berlinskega zidu in njegovimi posledicami.
Historians will have to make sense of what happened in the challenging decade 2000 – 2010, which probably saw the end of a cycle of peace, prosperity and fraternity among the peoples of Europe that began after the Second World War and ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall and its consequences.
To desetletje se je začelo z uvedbo evra, ki je pomenil veliko upanje za denarno stabilnost, spremenil pa se je v veliko proračunsko polomijo, saj smo pozabili, da monetarne unije ni mogoče imeti brez gospodarske unije in da države članice ne upoštevajo pakta za stabilnost, ki so ga podpisale.
The decade opened with the introduction of the euro, the great hope for monetary stability that turned into an enormous budget fiasco, since it had been forgotten that there can be no monetary union without economic union and the States did not abide by the stability pact they had signed.
Nadaljevalo se je s Pogodbo iz Nice, ki je začela veljati 1. februarja 2003 in je bila tako porazna in zapletena, da so podpisnice nemudoma začele razpravo o prihodnosti Unije, ki naj bi privedla do sprejetja novega akta.
It continued via the Treaty of Nice, which entered into force on 1 February 2003 and was so disastrous and complex that the signatories immediately launched a ‘debate on the future of the Union’, which would supposedly lead to a new text.
To obdobje je prineslo tudi izjemno veselje, ko se je stara celina leta 2004 in 2007 končno spet združila s pristopom 12 držav, od tega 10 postkomunističnih, vendar je prihod krize podžgal tudi nacionalno samoljubje, ki vpliva na nekatere dele javnosti.
It experienced immense joy when the continent was finally reunified in 2004 and 2007 with the accession of 12 States, 10 of which were post-communist, but the onset of the crisis inflamed national self-interest, which had an impact on public opinion in some quarters.
V tem desetletju smo bili priča občutku nemoči narodov, ki od leta 2005 skupaj s Francijo in Nizozemsko izražajo željo po razumevanju in tem, da jih ne bi pozabili pri evropskem združevanju, ki ga ne razumejo več.
It witnessed the disarray of peoples who, starting in 2005 with France and the Netherlands, expressed their hunger to understand and not be forgotten by a European project that they no longer understood.
Naj se Francija in Nizozemska ne počutita krivi: če bi leta 2005 izvedli 25 referendumov, bi proti glasovali več kot dve državi.
France and the Netherlands should not be made to feel guilty: had there been 25 referendums in 2005, more than two States would have voted NO.
Desetletje se je končalo s finančno in gospodarsko krizo, ki traja že od leta 2008.
The decade drew to a close with the financial and economic crisis from 2008 onwards.
Leto 2009 se je končalo z novimi institucijami, novo sestavo Evropske komisije in Evropskega parlamenta.
It ended in 2009 with new institutions, a new European Commission and a new European Parliament.
Medtem se je Unija lotila dveh pomembnih projektov: Galileo in Iter, pri katerih so temelj uspeha znanost in raziskave in katerih težave kažejo na težko evropsko stvarnost.
In the meantime, the Union had committed itself to two major projects: Galileo and ITER, for the success of which science and research are crucial and the difficulties of which illustrate the harsh European reality.
Kako bi si lahko ob takih političnih dogodkih predstavljali, da lahko upamo postati prvo in najbolj konkurenčno na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu?
How, in the light of such political events, can we have imagined that we might hope to become the leading knowledge-based economy, the most competitive in the world?
Zdaj, ko se je to desetletje izteklo, se EU in države članice spopadajo z velikim izzivom: zagotoviti svojim narodom blaginjo in družbeni napredek v tem svetu, ki se premika tako hitro in ki postaja vedno bolj zapleten.
In the past decade the EU and the Member States have faced an enormous challenge: to give their peoples prosperity and social progress in a fast-moving and increasingly complex world.
Države so potrebovale čas, da so, potem ko jih je minila nostalgija po imperijih, razumele, da postajajo premajhne in da se morajo združiti.
States have taken time to realise, once the nostalgia for empire passed, that they were becoming too small and needed to unite.
Evropa pa bo potrebovala čas, da bo razumela, da ni več vélika celina.
Europe will take time to understand that it is no longer a great continent.
Razumeti mora tudi, da so njene konkurentke države, ki se raztezajo čez cele celine: Kitajska, Rusija, Indija, Brazilija; pozabiti ne smemo niti na Združene države in Avstralijo.
Europe must understand that its competitors are, in themselves, ‘Continent States’: China, Russia, India, Brazil, not to mention the United States and Australia.
Vendar mi nismo narod: smo zveza držav.
But we are not a Nation: we are a Union of States.
Združiti se moramo, da bi si postavili prednostne naloge.
We must unite to set our priorities.
V teh razmerah verjetno prav znanost omogoča združevanje, če se izvaja zavestno in seveda neodvisno od interesov, ki ne zadevajo Unije.
In this context science is probably about coming together, as long as it is done with conscience and, of course, independently of interests outside the Union.
To poročilo sledi temu duhu: preučiti, ali bi utegnil biti pregled sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj priložnost za utrditev zlatega trikotnika znanja, izobraževanja in raziskav, saj je to ključ do naše skupne usode.
This report is being proposed in this spirit: to consider whether the review of the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7) may offer an opportunity to consolidate the golden triangle of knowledge, education and research that is the key to Europeans’ destiny.
Zakaj to predlagati že pri pregledu sedmega okvirnega programa in ne počakati na osmega?
Why propose this for the review of FP7 and not wait for FP8?
Ker so se od leta 2006, ko sta Parlament in Svet sprejela končno odločitev o sedmem okvirnem programu, pojavili štirje novi dejavniki, ki vplivajo na raziskave in znanost:
Because four new factors affecting research and science have arisen since 2006, the year that the final decision on FP7 was taken by Parliament and the Council:
· z Lizbonsko pogodbo, ki velja od 1. decembra 2009, smo dobili nove institucije;
· under the Treaty of Lisbon, in force since 1 December 2009, we have new institutions;
· imamo novo sestavo Komisije in Parlamenta;
· we have a new Commission and a new Parliament;
· imamo nov načrt za EU 2020;
· we have a new EU 2020 roadmap;
· doživljamo zelo veliko finančno in gospodarsko krizo, ki se je začela po pogajanjih o sedmeme okvirnem programu, ki so potekala konec leta 2007 in v letu 2008, zadnja leta načrtovanja (2011–2013) pa bodo kritična za rast in izhod iz krize: torej ne smemo ničesar prepustiti naključju.
· we are undergoing a major financial and economic crisis that started after negotiation of FP7 at the end of 2007/during 2008 and the final programming years (2011-2013) are fragile years for growth and exiting from the crisis: nothing must therefore be left to chance.