natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(19b) V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in je ne uporablja.
( 19b ) In accordance with Article 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the Position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
Ta direktiva določa pravila glede pravic do tolmačenja in prevajanja v kazenskih postopkih in postopkih za izvrševanje evropskega naloga za prijetje.
This Directive lays down rules concerning the rights to interpretation and to translation in criminal proceedings and proceedings for the execution of a European Arrest Warrant.
Te pravice veljajo za vsakogar od trenutka, ko ga pristojni organi države članice z uradnim obvestilom ali kako drugače seznanijo, da je osumljen ali obtožen storitve kaznivega dejanja, do zaključka postopka, kar pomeni do končne ugotovitve o tem, ali je osumljenec oziroma obtoženec storil kaznivo dejanje, vključno, če pride v poštev, z izrekom kazni in obravnavo vseh pritožb .
Those rights apply to any person from the time that person is made aware by the competent authorities of a Member State , by official notification or otherwise, that he is suspected or accused of having committed a criminal offence until the conclusion of the proceedings, which is understood to mean the final determination of the question whether the suspected or accused person has committed the offence , including, where applicable, sentencing and the resolution of any appeal.
Kadar zakonodaja države članice predpisuje, da sankcije za manjše kršitve naloži organ, ki ni sodišče, pristojno za kazenske zadeve, da pa je zoper sankcije možna pritožba na to sodišče, se ta direktiva uporablja le za postopke pred tem sodiščem po takšni pritožbi.
Where the law of a Member State provides for the imposition of a sanction regarding minor offences by an authority other than a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters, and that sanction may be appealed to such a court, then this Directive shall only apply to the proceedings before that court following such an appeal.
Ta direktiva ne vpliva na predpise iz nacionalne zakonodaje v zvezi z navzočnostjo pravnega svetovalca v katerikoli fazi kazenskega postopka ter ne vpliva na predpise iz nacionalne zakonodaje v zvezi s pravico osumljenca ali obtoženca do vpogleda v dokumente v kazenskem postopku.
This Directive does not affect rules of national law concerning the presence of a legal counsel during any stage of the criminal proceedings, nor does it affect rules of national law concerning the right of access of a suspected or accused person to documents in criminal proceedings.
Države članice poskrbijo, da se osumljencu ali obtožencu, ki ne razume ali ne govori jezika zadevnega kazenskega postopka, nemudoma zagotovi tolmačenje ▌med kazenskim postopkom pred preiskovalnimi in sodnimi organi, tudi med policijskim zaslišanjem, med zaslišanjem pred sodiščem in na katerem koli potrebnem vmesnem zaslišanju ▌ .
Member States shall ensure that a suspected or accused person who does not understand or speak the language of the criminal proceedings concerned is provided without delay with interpretation ▌during criminal proceedings before investigative and judicial authorities, including during police questioning, during all court hearings and during any necessary interim hearings ▌ .
Države članice zagotovijo, da je, kadar je to potrebno za zagotovitev pravičnega postopka, na voljo tolmačenje komuniciranja med osumljencem ali obtožencem ter njegovim pravnim svetovalcem, kadar je vsebina pogovora povezana s kakršnim koli zaslišanjem v postopku ali z vložitvijo pritožbe ali drugih prošenj v postopku .
Member States shall ensure that, where necessary for the purpose of ensuring the fairness of the proceedings, interpretation is available for communication between the suspected or accused person and his legal counsel in direct connection with any questioning or hearing during the proceedings or with the lodging of an appeal or other procedural applications .
Pravica do tolmačenja obsega pomoč osebam z motnjami sluha ali govora.
The right to interpretation includes assistance of persons with hearing or speech impediments.
Države članice zagotovijo, da je vzpostavljen postopek ali mehanizem za ugotavljanje, ali osumljenec ali obtoženec ▌razume in govori jezik kazenskega postopka ter ali potrebuje pomoč tolmača.
Member States shall ensure that a procedure or mechanism is in place to ascertain whether the suspected or accused person ▌understands and speaks the language of the criminal proceedings and needs the assistance of an interpreter.
Države članice zagotovijo, da ▌ima v skladu s postopki iz nacionalne zakonodaje osumljenec ali obtoženec pravico, da ugovarja ugotovitvi o nepotrebnosti tolmačenja, kadar je tolmačenje na voljo, pa se ima možnost pritožiti, če ni dovolj kakovostno za zagotovitev pravičnega postopka.
Member States shall ensure that ▌, in accordance with procedures in national law, the suspected or accused person has the right to challenge a decision finding that there is no need for interpretation and, when interpretation has been provided, the possibility to complain that the quality of the interpretation is not sufficient to ensure the fairness of the proceedings.
Kadar je to primerno, se lahko uporabljajo tehnologije, kot so videokonference ali komuniciranje po telefonu ali prek interneta, razen če je za zagotovitev pravičnega postopka potrebna fizična navzočnost tolmača.
Where appropriate, technology such as videoconferencing or communication by telephone or internet may be employed, unless the physical presence of the interpreter is required in order to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings.
Izvršitvena država članica pri postopku za izvrševanje evropskega naloga za prijetje zagotovi, da njeni pristojni organi vsaki osebi, ki je udeležena v takšnem postopku in ki ne razume ali govori jezika postopka, zagotovijo tolmačenje v skladu s tem členom.
In proceedings for the execution of a European Arrest Warrant, the executing Member State shall ensure that its competent authorities provide any person subject to such proceedings who does not understand or speak the language of the proceedings, with interpretation in accordance with this Article.
Tolmačenje, ki se ga nudi po tem členu, je zadostne kakovosti, da se zagotovi pravičen postopek, zlasti tako, da je osumljenec ali obtoženec v kazenskem postopku seznanjen s postopkom proti njemu in sposoben uveljavljati svojo pravico do obrambe.
Interpretation provided under this Article shall be of a quality sufficient to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings, in particular by ensuring that the suspected or accused person in criminal proceedings has knowledge of the case against him and is able to exercise the right to defend himself.
Člen 3 Pravica do prevajanja bistvenih dokumentov
Article 3 Right to translation of essential documents
Države članice poskrbijo, da se v razumnem roku osumljencu ali obtožencu, ki ne razume jezika zadevnega kazenskega postopka, zagotovi ▌ pisni prevod vseh dokumentov, ki so bistveni za omogočanje uveljavljanja njegove pravice do obrambe in za zaščito pravičnega postopka ▌.
Member States shall ensure that, within a reasonable period of time, a suspected or accused person who does not understand the language of the criminal proceedings concerned is provided with written translation ▌ of all documents which are essential ▌ to ensure that he is able to exercise the right to defend himself and to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings ▌.
2. ▌Bistveni dokumenti ▌vključujejo ▌odločbe, s katerimi se osebi odvzame prostost, obtožnico in katero koli sodbo▌.
2. ▌Essential documents ▌include ▌decisions depriving a person of his liberty, the charge / indictment and any judgment ▌ .
Pristojni organi za vsak primer posebej odločijo, ali je bistven še kakšen drug dokument.
The competent authorities shall decide in any given case whether any other document is essential.
Osumljenec ali obtoženec ali njegov pravni svetovalec lahko za ta namen vloži utemeljeno zahtevo ▌.
The suspected or accused person or his legal counsel may submit a reasoned request to this effect.
Delov bistvenih dokumentov, ki ne igrajo vloge pri tem, da je osumljenec ali obtoženec seznanjen s postopkom, ki poteka proti njemu, ni treba prevesti..
Passages of essential documents which are not relevant for the suspected or accused person to have knowledge of the case against him do not have to be translated.
Države članice zagotovijo, da ▌ima v skladu s postopki iz nacionalne zakonodaje osumljenec ali obtoženec pravico do ugovarjanja ugotovitvi, da prevod dokumentov ali njihovih delov ni potreben , kadar je prevod na voljo, pa se ima možnost pritožiti, če ni dovolj kakovosten za zagotovitev pravičnega postopka.
Member States shall ensure that , in accordance with procedures in national law , the suspected or accused person has the right to challenge a decision finding that there is no need for translation of documents or passages thereof and, when translation has been provided, the possibility to complain that the quality of the translation is not sufficient to ensure the fairness of the proceedings.
Izvršitvena država članica pri postopku za izvrševanje evropskega naloga za prijetje zagotovi, da njeni pristojni organi vsaki osebi, ki je udeležena v takšnem postopku in ki ne razume jezika, v katerem je napisan evropski nalog za prijetje ali v katerega ga je odreditvena država članica prevedla, zagotovijo pisni prevod tega dokumenta.
In proceedings for the execution of a European Arrest Warrant, the executing Member State shall ensure that its competent authorities provide any person subject to such proceedings who does not understand the language in which the European Arrest Warrant is drawn up, or into which it has been translated by the issuing Member State, with a written translation of that document.
Kot izjema k splošnim pravilom iz zgornjih odstavkov 1, 2, 3 in 5 se lahko namesto pisnega prevoda ▌zagotovi ustni prevod ali ustni povzetek bistvenih dokumentov iz tega člena, če to ne vpliva na pravičnost postopka.
As an exception to the general rules established in paragraph 1, 2, 3 and 5 above, an oral translation or an oral summary of the essential documents referred to in this Article may ▌ be provided instead of a written translation , on condition that such oral translation or oral summary does not affect the fairness of the proceedings .
Pri odpovedi pravici do prevoda dokumentov iz tega člena bi morale biti izpolnjene zahteve, da je osumljenec ali obtoženec pred tem prejel pravni nasvet ali je bil kako drugače popolnoma seznanjen s posledicami odpovedi tej pravici ter da je bila odpoved dana nedvoumno in prostovoljno.
Any waiver of the right to translation of documents referred to in this Article should be subject to the requirements that the suspected or accused person ▌has received prior legal advice or has otherwise obtained full knowledge of the consequences of his waiver, and that the waiver was unequivocal and given voluntarily.
Prevod, ki se ga nudi po tem členu, je zadostne kakovosti za zagotovitev pravičnega postopka, in sicer se zlasti zagotovi, da je osumljenec ali obtoženec v kazenskem postopku seznanjen s postopkom proti njemu in je sposoben uveljavljati svojo pravico do obrambe.
Translation provided under this Article shall be of a quality sufficient to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings, in particular by ensuring that the suspected or accused person in criminal proceedings has knowledge of the case against him and is able to exercise the right to defend himself.
Člen 4 Stroški tolmačenja in prevajanja
Article 4Costs of interpretation and translation
Stroške tolmačenja in prevajanja, ki izhajajo iz uporabe členov 2 in 3, nosijo države članice ne glede na izid postopka.
Member States shall cover the costs of interpretation and translation resulting from the application of Articles 2 and 3, irrespective of the outcome of the proceedings.
Države članice sprejmejo konkretne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovijo, da sta tolmačenje in prevajanje ▌ kakovosti , kot je zahtevana v členih 2(6) in 3(8).
Member States shall take concrete measures to ensure that the interpretation and translation provided meets the quality required under Articles 2(6) and 3(8).
Za spodbujanje ustrezne ravni tolmačenja in prevajanja in uspešen dostop do njiju si države članice prizadevajo za oblikovanje registra ali registrov neodvisnih sodnih tolmačev, ki so ustrezno usposobljeni.
In order to promote the adequacy of interpretation and translation and efficient access to it, Member States shall endeavour to establish a register or registers of independent translators and interpreters who are appropriately qualified.
Nato bi moral biti registri dani na voljo pravnim zastopnikom in pristojnim organom.
Once established, such register or registers should be made available to legal counsel and relevant authorities.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so tolmači in prevajalci zavezani k spoštovanju zaupnosti v zvezi s tolmačenjem in prevajanjem po tej direktivi.
Member States shall ensure that interpreters and translators will be required to observe confidentiality regarding interpretation and translation provided under this Directive.
Člen 5a Strokovno usposabljanje
Article 5a Training
Brez poseganja v neodvisnost sodstva ali različno organiziranost pravosodja v Evropski uniji države članice prosijo odgovorne za usposabljanje sodnikov, tožilcev in zaposlenih v sodstvu, ki sodelujejo v kazenskih postopkih, naj so zlasti pozorni na posebnosti komuniciranja s pomočjo tolmača, da bo to komuniciranje uspešno in učinkovito.
Without prejudice to judicial independence or different judicial organisations in the European Union, Member States shall request those responsible for the training of judges, prosecutors and judicial staff involved in criminal proceedings to give special attention to the particularities of communicating with the assistance of an interpreter so as to ensure efficient and effective communication.
Vodenje evidence
Keeping of record
Če preiskovalni ali sodni organ opravi pogovor z osumljencem ali obtožencem s pomočjo tolmača v skladu s členom 2, če je nuden ustni prevod ali ustni povzetek bistvenih dokumentov v navzočnosti tega organa v skladu s členom 3(6) ali če gre za odpoved pravicam v skladu s členom 3(7), države članice zagotovijo, da se te primere zabeleži, pri čemer se uporablja postopek zabeležbe v skladu z nacionalnimi zakonodajami držav članic.
Member States shall ensure that when interviews with a suspected or accused person have been conducted by an investigative or judicial authority with the aid of an interpreter pursuant to Article 2, when an oral translation or oral summary of essential documents is provided in the presence of such an authority pursuant to Article 3(6), or when there is a waiver of rights pursuant to Article 3(7), it will be noted that these events have occurred, using the recording procedure in accordance with the national law of the Member State concerned.
Ta direktiva v nobenem primeru ne pomeni omejevanja ali odstopanja od pravic in procesnih jamstev, ki jih morda jamčijo Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah , druge zadevne določbe mednarodnega prava ali zakoni katere koli države članice, ki zagotavljajo višjo stopnjo varstva.
Nothing in this Directive shall be construed as limiting or derogating from any of the rights and procedural safeguards that may be ensured under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights , under other relevant provisions of international law or under the laws of any Member States which provide a higher level of protection.
Države članice sprejmejo ▌ zakone, predpise in upravne določbe, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo , do …
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary ▌to comply with ▌this Directive by …
* UL: Prosimo vstavite datum 36 mesecev po objavi te direktive v Uradnem listu. * .
* OJ: Please insert a date 36 months after the publication of this Directive in the Official Journal. * .
Države članice se v predpisih, ki jih sprejmejo, sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
When Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Način sklicevanja določijo države članice.
The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by the Member States.
Člen 8Poročanje
Article 8Report
Komisija do …
The Commission shall, by ….
** UL: Prosimo vstavite datum 48 mesecev po objavi te direktive v Uradnem listu. ** Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo, v katerem oceni, v kolikšnem obsegu so države članice sprejele potrebne ukrepe za izpolnjevanje določb te direktive, po potrebi skupaj z zakonodajnimi predlogi.
** OJ: Please insert a date 48 months after the publication of this Directive in the Official Journal. ** , submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Directive, accompanied, if necessary, by legislative proposals.
Člen 9 Začetek veljavnosti
Article 9 Entry into force
Ta direktiva začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Člen10 Naslovniki
Article 10 Addressees
Komisija je leta 2004 predložila predlog direktivo Sveta o določenih postopkovnih pravicah v kazenskem postopku na celotnem območju Evropske unije (KOM (2004) 348), ki je zajemala razmeroma široko paleto zadev.
In 2004 the Commission made a proposal for a Council Directive on procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the EU (COM (2004) 348), covering a reasonably wide set of matters.
Parlament se je strinjal s Komisijo, da bi z uskladitvijo pravic posameznikov v preiskavah in sodnih postopkih močno okrepili zaupanje med državami članicami na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja, in je predlog trdno podprl.
The Parliament strongly supported the proposal, agreeing with the Commission that trust between Member States in the field of judicial cooperation would be greatly enhanced by harmonised rights for individuals in investigations and judicial proceedings.
Vendar pa so bila pogajanja s Svetom o tem širokem ukrepu leta 2007 ustavljena, saj države članice niso uspele doseči sporazuma.
However negotiation in the Council on this wide measure was abandoned in 2007 due to the failure of Member States to reach agreement.
Evropski svet je pozdravil sprejetje načrta, ki vsebuje pet ukrepov, ki so že bili v predlogu iz leta 2004: pravico do tolmačenja in prevajanja; pravica do obveščenosti o pravicah in o stroških (obvestilo o pravicah); pravico do pravnega svetovanja in pravne pomoči; komuniciranje s konzularnimi organi in tretjimi osebami, na primer z delodajalcem, družino ali prijatelji; pravico ranljivih obdolžencev do posebne podpore in zaščitnih ukrepov.
The European Council welcomed the adoption by the Council of the Roadmap, of which the 5 measures envisaged are those within the scope of the 2004 proposal: rights to translation and interpretation; the right to information on rights and about the charges (a ‘Letter of Rights’); the right to legal advice and legal aid; communication with consular authorities and third parties such as employers, family or friends; and the right of vulnerable defendants to specific support and safeguards.
Poleg tega je predvidena zelena knjiga o priporu v predkazenskem postopku.
In addition, a Green paper on pre-trial detention is foreseen.
Evropski svet je v stockholmskem programu povabil Komisijo, naj predloži predloge, predvidene v načrtu, za hiter začetek njihovega izvajanja, da bi nadalje preučili minimalne procesne pravice osumljenih ali obtoženih oseb, in ocenili, ali je treba za boljše sodelovanje na tem področju obravnavati še druga vprašanja, kot je domneva nedolžnosti.
In the Stockholm Programme the European Council invited the Commission to put forward the proposals foreseen in the Roadmap for its swift implementation, to examine further elements of minimum procedural rights for accused and suspect persons, and to assess whether other issues for instance the presumption of innocence needs to be addressed, to promote better cooperation in this area.
Komisija je julija 2009 kot prvi ukrep iz načrta predlagala okvirni sklep Sveta (KOM(2009)338), ki je bil namenjen izključno pravici do tolmačenja in prevajanja v kazenskih postopkih.
In July 2009 the Commission proposed as the first Roadmap measure a Council framework decision (COM(2009)338) devoted exclusively to the right to interpretation and to translation in criminal proceedings.
Opravljeno je bilo posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom, sedanja poročevalka pa je pripravila osnutek poročila (2009/0101 – PR/793491 – PE 430.359v01-00), vendar se postopek ni nadaljeval zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe.
The European Parliament was consulted and a draft report was produced by the present rapporteur (2009/0101 – PR/793491 – PE 430.359v01-00), but this was not progressed due to the coming into force of the Lisbon treaty.
V obžalovanja vrednem minimalističnem pristopu k demokratičnemu delovanju se Komisija ni posvetovala z Evropskim parlamentom niti o načrtu niti o resoluciji o izvajanju jezikovnih pravic iz okvirnega sklepa v praksi.
In a regrettably minimalist approach to democratic engagement, the European Parliament was consulted neither on the Roadmap nor on the Resolution concerning practical implementation of the language rights Framework Decision.
Iz praktičnih razlogov Komisija decembra 2009 ni bila v položaju, da bi podala zgodnji predlog direktive o jezikovnih pravicah, zato je to storila skupina držav članic (PE-CONS 1/10).Vsebina predloga odraža sporazum o okvirnem sklepu med 27 vladami iz oktobra 2009, ki je bil sprejet v skladu s takratnim pogojem o soglasju.
For practical reasons, the Commission was not in a position in December 2009 to make an early proposal for a Directive on language rights and thus this was done by a group of Member States (PE-CONS 1/10), with the content reflecting the agreement of the 27 governments in October 2009 on the framework decision in the context of the then unanimity requirement.
Stališče poročevalke
Position of the rapporteur
Načrt je treba končati in v bližnji prihodnosti sprejeti dodatne ukrepe za krepitev zaupanja in pravic, pri čemer je nujno treba prednostno obravnavati pravico obdolženca, da se mu varščino odobri na nediskriminatorni podlagi.
Not only must the Roadmap be completed but also further confidence-building and rights-enhancing measures must be effected in the near future: the right of foreign defendants to be considered for grant of bail on a non-discriminatory basis is an urgent priority.
Vse predloge iz načrta je treba kar najhitreje pripraviti, saj so procesne pravice med seboj tesno povezane.
All the Roadmap proposals should be brought forward as soon as possible since procedural rights are closely inter-linked.
Pravico do učinkovitega prevoda in tolmačenja lahko na primer izniči nezadostna obveščenost o pravicah ali nerazpoložljivost takojšnje ali brezplačne pravne pomoči.
For instance the right to effective translation and interpretation can be undermined by insufficient information about rights or the unavailability of prompt or free legal advice.