natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Doslej je svoje operativne programe predložilo le nekaj držav članic, pa še ti so vsebovali relativno majhne zneske glede na celoten finančni okvir ESR.
To date only a few Member States have submitted their operational programmes, for relatively small amounts compared to the total EFF envelope.
GD za ribištvo pričakuje predložitev večjih operativnih programov do konca julija.
DG FISH expects to the larger operational programmes by end-July.
Stanje v sredini septembra bi moralo dati jasnejšo sliko morebitnih tveganj.
A state of play by mid September should provide a better picture of possible risks.
Napovedi plačil v letu 2008 za države članice
Member States' payments´ forecasts for 2008
Komisija je države članice pozvala, naj napovedi v zvezi s plačili za 2008 vložijo do 30. aprila 2007.
The Commission has requested Member States to provide the payment forecasts for 2008 by 30 April 2007.
Odbor za proračun je te informacije zahteval, ker bodo ključnega pomena pri sprejemanju proračuna za 2008 in oblikovanju plačil.
COBU has asked for this information as it will be crucial for the 2008 budgetary procedure in relation to the payments level.
Več držav članic je informacije posredovalo prepozno, druge pa morajo še vedno vložiti napovedi za več programov.
Several Member States provided the information belatedly; others have still to provide the forecasts for several programmes.
Posledično Komisija v tej fazi še ne more predstaviti primerjalnega pregleda napovedi.
In consequence, at this stage the Commission is not yet in a position to give a consolidated view of the forecasts.
85 % napovedi za programe strukturnih skladov je vloženih in preverjenih, medtem ko je bilo poslanih le 50 % napovedi za programe INTERREG.
For the 2000-2006 programmes, the situation is a little better, 85% of the forecast for the Structural Fund programmes have been provided and verified, though only 50% of the forecasts for INTERREG programmes have been sent.
Za obdobje pred letom 2007 manjkajo informacije o projektih kohezijskega sklada za 3 države članice.
For the pre-2007 projects of the Cohesion Fund, information is missing for 3 Member States.
Kljub temu bi Komisija lahko objavila primerjalni pregled doslej prejetih in preverjenih informacij, in sicer na osnovi naslednjih predpostavk:
However, the Commission could give a consolidated view of the information received and verified so far, on the basis of the following assumptions:
• Kar zadeva programe za obdobje 2007-2013, Komisija predpostavlja, da so napovedi enake PPP.
• For the 2007-2013 programmes, the Commission assumes that forecasts are equal to the PDB
• Kar pa zadeva programe in projekte v obdobju 2000-2006, Komisija predpostavlja, da so manjkajoče napovedi enake napovedim, posredovanim za zahtevke za plačilo za 2006.
• For the programmes and projects of the period 2000-2006, the Commission assumes that the missing forecasts are equal to the forecasts provided for the 2006 payment claims.
Upoštevajoč te predpostavke je Komisija objavila primerjavo med napovedmi držav članic za 2008 s PPP 2008, prikazano v tabeli 20:
Under these assumptions, the Commission gives a comparison of Member States' payment forecasts for 2008 with PDB 2008 in the following table 20:
Napovedi držav članic v zvezi s plačili, kot so izračunane v zgornji tabeli, so presegle PPP za 30 % ali skoraj 13 milijard EUR.
Member States' payment forecasts, computed as above, exceed the PDB by 30 % or almost EUR 13 billion.
Povedati je treba, da so bile napovedi preprosto preveč optimistične, saj so bile od dejanskega stanja višje za več kot 20 %.
To put this into context, it should be noted that the forecasts have typically been over-optimistic, exceeding actual execution by over 20%.
V 2006 so bile napovedi višje od dejanskega izvrševanja za 33 % ali 9,6 milijarde EUR.
In 2006, the forecasts over-estimated execution by 33% or EUR 9.6 billion.
Po podatkih Komisije so napake v napovedih držav članic zmeraj presegale 6 milijard EUR.
According to the Commission The estimation errors implicit in Member States' forecasts have always been above EUR 6 billion.
Izpostaviti je treba tudi, da je decembra 2006 prišlo do primanjkljaja odobritev plačil za strukturne sklade v višini 500 milijonov.
It should also be pointed out that in December 2006 there was a shortage in payments appropriations for the Structural Funds which amounted to 500 million.
Zaključki - ČAS JE DENAR!
Conclusions - TIME IS MONEY!
Da bi se izognili dodatnim zamudam pri izvrševanju programov 2007-2013 in da bi kar v največji možni meri preprečili ponovitev težav iz programov 2000-2006 je treba izvesti naslednje nujne in takojšnje ukrepe:
The following urgent and immediate steps must be undertaken in order to avoid further delays in the implementation of the 2007-2013 programmes and in order to avoid as much as possible the repetition of the problems experienced with the 2000-2006 programmes:
Naslednji najpomembnejši korak je brez dvoma dokončna izpeljava operativnih programov.
The next most urgent steps ahead will clearly be the finalisation of operational programmes.
17. avgusta je bilo sprejetih zgolj 61 od 314 operativnih programov za ESSR in kohezijski sklad, večine programov pa Komisija še ni sprejela (glej tabelo 8 spodaj).
On 17 August not more than 61 out of 314 operational programmes for the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund were adopted, the adoption of most of them by the Commission was still missing (see table 8 below).
Posebno pozornost velja nameniti programom razvoja podeželja, saj ti bistveno zaostajajo za zadanimi cilji.
Special attention should be attached to rural development programmes because they are clearly legging behind schedule.
Pomemben korak v pravo smer je bilo sprejetje naslednje SKUPNE IZJAVE Sveta in Parlamenta, o kateri so se dogovorili na usklajevalnem sestanku 13. julija 2007:
An important step forward in this direction was the adoption of the following JOINT STATEMENT of Council and Parliament which was agreed at the conciliation meeting on 13 July 2007:
„ Evropski parlament in Svet velik pomen pripisujeta temu, da Komisija hitro sprejme operativne programe in projekte, ki jih predstavijo države članice v zvezi z novimi programi strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov za obdobje 2007–2013 ter programi, ki se financirajo v okviru razvoja podeželja .
" The European Parliament and the Council attach the greatest importance to a rapid approval by the Commission of the operational programmes and projects presented by Member States in relation with the new Structural and Cohesion Funds programmes for the 2007-2013 period, as well as for programmes financed under rural development.
Za ta namen se od Komisije zahteva, da še naprej zagotavlja redna posebna orodja za spremljanje med proračunskim postopkom, vključno s shematskim prikazom.“
To this end, the Commission is requested to continue to provide regularly specific monitoring tools, including a flow chart, during the budgetary procedure ."
V pravnem okviru proračunskega postopka za leto 2008 je treba posebno pozornost posvetiti sprejetju programov in zmanjšanju neporavnanih obveznosti.
In the framework of the budgetary procedure 2008 special attention has to be paid to the adoption of programmes and the reduction of RAL.
Kakor hitro je mogoče, je treba izpolniti še nekaj preostalih nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirov (NSRF) in sprejeti odločitev v zvezi z njimi.
The few remaining National Strategic Reference Frameworks (NSRF) should be completed and decided as soon as possible with the greatest urgency.
Postopek plačevanja neporavnanih obveznosti (RAL) se mora bistveno izboljšati: kot smo že omenili zgoraj, je RAL za strukturne sklade konec leta 2006 znašal skoraj 78 milijard EUR.
Important progress needs to be made on the RAL payments: as mentioned above RAL for Structural Funds stood at nearly EUR 78 billion (!) by the end of 2006.
V primerjavi z vsemi plačili v PPP za 2008, ki znašajo 121 milijard, je to dokaj visok znesek.
This is quite an impressive amount compared to the overall payments in the PDB for 2008 amount to 121 billion.
Poročevalci se ne strinjajo s Komisijo, ki meni, da je RAL v višini dvoletnega zneska obveznosti povsem običajen.
Furthermore, the rapporteurs do not share the Commission's assumption that RAL amounting to two years´ commitments can be regarded as "normal".
Zamude so znova dokazale, da je trenutni postopek preveč zamuden in natančen.
The delays have shown again that the current procedure is too time consuming and detailed.
Preučiti in razviti je treba boljši način izvajanja strukturne politike, ki temelji na jasni razdelitvi odgovornosti in upoštevanju pristojnosti celotne EU in posameznih držav članic.
A better way of executing structural policy has to be examined and developed based on a clear division of responsibilities and respect of competences between the EU and Member States .
Tabela 9: Obveznosti in plačila držav članic v letih 2000-2006, vsi programi (vrednosti v milijonih EUR)
Table 9: Commitments and payments from 2000 to 2006 by Member State , all programmes (€ million)
Tabela 10: Neporavnane obveznosti za programsko obdobje 2000-2006 po državi članici ob koncu leta 2006 (milijoni EUR)
Table 10: Outstanding commitments at the end of 2006 from the 2000-2006 programming period by Member State (million €)
Tabela 11: Dodelitev sredstev iz strukturnih skladov EU-10 za obdobje 2004-2006, porazdelitev med države članice (INTERREG, tehnična podpora in inovacije, ki jih ni mogoče pripisati posamezni državi članici, so izvzeti)
Table 11: Allocation from the Structural Funds to EU-10 for the period 2004-2006, breakdown per Member State (INTERREG, technical assistance and innovative actions which cannot be attributed to a single Member State , excluded )
Tabela 12: Vsa plačila ob koncu 2005 in nova plačila v letu 2006 v državah članicah EU-10 (glavni programi in pobuda skupnosti EQUAL) v primerjavi z nacionalno dodeljenimi sredstvi za obdobje 2004-06
Table 12: Total payments at the end of 2005 and new payments in 2006 by EU-10 Member States (mainstream programmes and Community Initiative EQUAL) compared to the national allocation available for the period 2004-06
Vsa plačila za programe EU-10, opravljena v letu 2006, so bila vmesna plačila, saj so bila vsa predplačila izvršena v letih 2004 in 2005.
All the payments made in 2006 for EU-10 programmes were interim payments, as all the payments on account were made in 2004-2005 .
Delovni dokument o skupinah za spremljanje
Working document on monitoring groups
Med proračunskim postopkom za leto 2007 je bilo vprašanje ustreznega kakovostnega in količinskega spremljanja ter izvajanja proračuna temelj sprejete strategije.
During the 2007 budget procedure, the issue of proper monitoring and implementation of the budget, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, was a cornerstone of the adopted strategy.
To se je izrazilo tudi s sprejetjem skupne izjave za zagotavljanje primernega izvajanja proračuna na novembrskem usklajevalnem sestanku (Priloga 1).
This was also reflected by the adoption of the Joint Statement to ensure proper budget implementation at the November Conciliation (Annex 1).
Leta 2007 se je prizadevanje Odbora za proračun za boljšo porabo javnih sredstev in pregled izvajanja programov s strani Komisije nemoteno preneslo tudi v postopek za leto 2008, ker je poudarek na jasnem oblikovanju proračuna in upravljanju na podlagi dejavnosti ključni element za doseganje boljših rezultatov.
During 2007, the Budget Committee's approach towards better use of public money and scrutiny of the Commission's implementation of the programmes has also flowed seamlessly into the 2008 procedure as a focus on clear activity based budgeting and management is one key element to achieve better results.
Eden od pomembnih načinov za boljšo proračunsko analizo programov EU in zagotovitev boljšega izvajanja (skupaj s specializiranimi odbori in Komisijo) so tako imenovane „skupine za spremljanje“.
One important means of carrying out better budgetary analysis of EU programmes, and to ensure better implementation (in cooperation with both specialised committees and the Commission), is the so-called "Monitoring Groups".
Po več razpravah na sestankih koordinatorjev Odbora za proračun je bilo 7. maja 2007 sklenjeno, da se bo leta 2007 organiziralo več takšnih razprav (glej Prilogo 2 za seznam razprav in povzetek njihovih rezultatov).
Following numerous discussions in the coordinators' meetings of the Budgets Committee, it was decided on 7 May 2007 that a number of these should be organised in 2007 (see Annex 2 for a list of these as well as a summary of their results).
Opozoriti je treba, da skupina za spremljanje dejansko pomeni sorazmerno neformalno organizirano „kratko zaslišanje glede proračunskih vprašanj“, ki vključuje zadevne specializirane odbore ter temelji na strokovnem znanju in sodelovanju Komisije.
It should be recalled that a Monitoring Group, essentially, is a "mini-hearing on budgetary matters" organised in a relatively informal way, inviting the specialised committees concerned, and drawing on the expertise and cooperation of the Commission..
Na tem sestanku so koordinatorji sprejeli tudi skupni pristop k metodologiji, obliki in dokumentaciji za takšne sestanke.
At the same meeting, coordinators also endorsed a common approach to the methodology, format and documentation that could be used for such meetings.
Ta vključuje zlasti potrebo po tesnem sodelovanju s specializiranimi odbori in po tem, da se izkoristi možnost preučitve (povezovanja) vidikov proračuna, ki se izvaja (leto n), in tekočega proračunskega postopka (n+1).
This included, notably, the need to closely involve specialised committees and, also, to seize the opportunity to examine (link) aspects of the budget being implemented (year N) and the ongoing budget procedure year (N+1).
Za združevanje vidikov proračunov n in n+1 bi ti sestanki običajno potekali od maja do julija ter se po potrebi podaljšali do septembra, tj. ko je na voljo predhodni predlog proračuna in pred prvo obravnavo EP.
In order to combine aspects of both budget n and n+1, the timing for these meetings would normally be May-July, possibly extending to September, i.e. when the PDB is available and before the EP's 1st reading.
Zaradi takšnega časovnega razporeda bi skupine lahko, če bi tako želeli njeni člani, sprejele in obravnavale nekatere delovne dokumente s predhodnimi predlogi proračuna (tj. izjave o dejavnosti v okviru oblikovanja proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti) ter elemente/področja, vključene v obvestilo Komisije o obveščanju o proračunskih napovedih.
With such a timing, the Groups would also be able to take onboard and examine, if so wished by members, certain working documents presented with the PDB (i.e. Activity Statements within the ABB framework) and, also, elements/areas included in the Commission BFA note (Budget Forecast Alert).
Splošne teme in posebni programi/področja za obravnavo so se določile s posebnim sklepom koordinatorjev.
The general subjects and specific programmes/areas to be examined were subject to a specific decision from the Coordinators.
V bolj operativnem smislu so se te teme nato „dodelile“ glavnim poročevalcem, ki so v sodelovanju s sekretariati začeli načrtovati posebno organizacijo.
In more detailed operational terms, these subjects were then "delegated" to the general rapporteurs who proceeded to the specific organisation in cooperation with the secretariat.
Do zdaj (julij 2007) se je organiziralo pet skupin, zadnja (kmetijstvo) pa se bo oblikovala v septembru.
To date (July 2007), the first five Groups have been organised with only the last one (Agriculture) remaining for September.
Metodologija, ki so jo potrdili koordinatorji
Methodology approved by coordinators
Vsak sestanek bi lahko na splošno vključeval dva dela, tj . izvajanje v letu 2007 in napovedi za leto 2008.
Each meeting could basically cover two parts, i.e. Implementation 2007 and Outlook for 2008
Na podlagi teh naslovov bi vsebina razprav lahko vključevala:
Under those headings, the purpose of the discussions could be:
Ø Uspešnost (je uresničevanje zastavljenih ciljev uspešno)?
Ø Effectiveness (are the pursued objectives achieved successfully)?
Ø Kako Komisija izvršuje odobrena proračunska sredstva za leto 2007?
Ø How is Commission implementing 2007 appropriations?
Ø Kaj se izvršuje glede na načrt?
Ø What is being implemented according to plan?
Ø Katera so težavna področja, zlasti tista, opredeljena kot del obveščanja o proračunskih napovedih?
Ø Which are the problem areas, especially those flagged as part of the BFA?
Ø Učinkovitost (je sedanji sistem najbolj stroškovno učinkovit za doseganje zastavljenih političnih ciljev)?
Ø Efficiency (is the current set-up the most cost-effective to achieve the policy goals set?
Ø Si je treba v prihodnjih letih prizadevati za spodbujanje dopolnjevanja in sinergije z drugimi programi?
Ø Should anything be done to promote complementarity and synergies with other programmes for future years?
Ø Ali obstaja potreba po boljšem usklajevanju zadevnih instrumentov/organov?
Ø Is there need for better co-ordination of instruments/bodies concerned?
Ø Kako se upoštevajo posebne pravice Parlamenta?
Ø How are the Parliament's prerogatives taken into account?
(Tudi v zvezi s kakršnimi koli poskusnimi projekti/pripravljalnimi ukrepi in/ali pripombami, sprejetimi v okviru proračuna.)
Also with regards to any PP/PAs and/or remarks adopted in the budget
Ø Kakšne so posebne zahteve ali skrbi odgovornih specializiranih odborov?
Ø What are the specific requests or concerns of the responsible specialised committees?
Dosedanje izkušnje in napovedi za prihodnost:
Experiences so far and outlook towards the future:
Obravnava vseh navedenih elementov na enem sestanku je bila očitno preveč ambiciozen cilj.
The examination of all the above elements was clearly too ambitious for any one meeting.
Namesto tega je bilo zelo koristno, da so se pisna vprašanja v zvezi z nekaterimi področji Komisiji predložila kot „vprašanja, ki jih vlaga EP“ ter so bila uporabna kot vsebinska usmeritev za razpravo in (prav tako pisne) zahteve za posebne informacije.
Rather, and very usefully, questions in writing covering some areas were presented to the Commission as "questions put by the EP" and served both as a useful guide to give substance to the discussion and to request specific information (also in writing).
Za še natančnejšo obravnavo navedenih področij je treba predvideti daljši čas za pripravo.
In order to go into an even deeper examination of the above areas a longer preparation time should be envisaged.
Letos so izjemno kratki časovni roki glavnim poročevalcem omogočili le oblikovanje lastnih sklopov vprašanj na podlagi strokovne pomoči sekretariata (vključno s sekretariati specializiranih odborov).
This year, extremely short time-limits only allowed the general rapporteurs to develop their own set of questions, drawing on the technical assistance of the secretariat (also including secretariats of specialised committees).
Dodatni ukrep bi lahko bil, da se ta del priprav prepusti glavnim poročevalcem, vendar je še bolj pomembno, da se skupinam zagotovi več časa za predložitev vprašanj in pravočasni sprejem uradnega vabila, ki sledi ustrezni odločitvi koordinatorjev, da bodo organizirali takšne sestanke.
The way forward is perhaps to let this part of preparation remain with the general rapporteurs but, importantly, allow longer time for groups to put down questions and receive formal invitations in good time following the relevant decisions by coordinators to organise such meetings.
Drugo vprašanje, o katerem je treba razmisliti, je, ali se morajo sestanki bolj usmeriti k podrobni obravnavi vidikov oblikovanja proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti in upravljanja na podlagi dejavnosti ob upoštevanju izjav Komisije o dejavnosti.
Another question that merits some thought is whether the meetings should develop more towards a thorough examination of ABB (activity based budgeting) and ABM (activity based management) aspects on the basis of the Activity Statements that the Commission produces?
Namesto tega se lahko ohrani večja „prilagodljivost“ sestankov in se jih usmeri le k nekaterim interesnim področjem in/ali vprašanjem specializiranih odborov in političnih skupin v Odboru za proračun.
Or, alternatively, whether the meetings should be kept more "flexible" and simply be based on certain fields of interest and/or questions expressed by the specialised committees and the political groups within the Budgets Committee itself.
Prednost te možnosti je seveda večja političnost in aktualnost, vendar na drugi strani ciljev, kazalnikov uspešnosti in izmerjenih rezultatov na področju oblikovanja proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti mogoče ne preučuje dovolj poglobljeno.
This of course has the advantage of being more political and topical but, on the other hand, does not necessarily penetrate very deeply into the world of ABB objectives, performance indicators, and measured results.
To je mogoče razumeti kot prednost in ne kot pomanjkljivost.
Some may consider that an advantage rather than a disadvantage.
Oblika, ki so jo potrdili koordinatorji
The format approved by coordinators
Sestanki skupine za spremljanje:
The monitoring group meetings would:
Ø bodo potekali pod skupnim vodstvom glavnih poročevalcev za leti 2007 in 2008;
Ø take place under the joint leadership of 2007 and 2008 general rapporteurs
Ø se bodo organizirali z zadevnim specializiranim odborom (zlasti s pripravljavci osnutka proračuna);
Ø be organised with the specialised committee concerned (especially involving budget draftsmen).
Ø bodo odprti za vse zainteresirane člane Odbora za proračun;
Ø be open to all interested COBU members
Ø bodo odprti tudi za člane Odbora za proračunski nadzor;
Ø be open also to COCOBU members
Ø bodo trajali približno 2 uri;
Ø last for approximately 2 hours
Ø ne bodo imeli na voljo storitev tolmačenja (za neuradne sestanke ne velja Kodeks o večjezičnosti).
Ø not have interpretation (informal meetings are not covered by the Code of Conduct on Multilinguism).
Zato bodo postopki običajno potekali v angleškem/francoskem jeziku;
Proceedings would therefore normally take place in EN/FR.
Ø Komisija bo vedno sodelovala.
Ø The Commission will always be associated.
Vabila je treba poslati GD za proračun in zadevnim specializiranim generalnim direktoratom;
Invitations to be sent to both DG BUDG and the specialised DG concerned.
Ø Ustrezna raven, na katero je treba nasloviti vabilo, je generalni direktor ali direktor.
Ø The appropriate level of invitation could be Director General or Director.
Dejanske udeležence določi Komisija, ker se je natančno operativno poznavanje programov izkazalo kot pogoj za uspešne sestanke.
Actual participation to be left to the Commission itself as detailed operational knowledge of programmes has proven to be a pre-requisite for successful meetings.
Sedanji postopek je bil morda izjemen, ker je bilo treba v zelo kratkem času organizirati precejšnje število sestankov (5).
The current procedure has perhaps been exceptional in that a significant number of meetings (5) had to be organised in a very short time.
Čeprav so splošne pripombe drugih odborov pozitivne (očitna naklonjenost možnosti, da se posebna pomembna vprašanja zastavi „nekaj prisotnim visokim uradnikom Komisije“, in možnosti pisnih zahtev za dodatne informacije), se lahko položaj dodatno izboljša s sprejetjem manj napornega časovnega razporeda v naslednjih letih.
Although the general remarks from other committees seem positive (clear appreciation of the possibility to put specific questions of interest to a 'concentrated presence of Commission high-level officials' and to have the possibility for further information in writing), things could be further improved by adopting a less stressful calendar for any future years.
To bi omogočilo tudi izboljšanje osnovne dokumentacije vsake skupine.
This could also allow for an improvement in the background material presented with each group.
Letos je Evropska komisija za zadevno temo zagotovila standardizirani „informativni list“.
This year, a standardised "fact-sheet" was provided by the European Commission for the subject in question.