natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 11/2010 – Kako je Komisija upravljala splošno proračunsko podporo v državah AKP ter latinskoameriških in azijskih državah;
– having regard to Court of Auditors Special Report No 11/2010 entitled ‘The Commission’s management of general budget support in ACP, Latin American and Asian countries’,
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Prihodnost proračunske podpore EU za tretje države (KOM(2010) 586),
– having regard to the Green Paper from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the future of budget support to third countries ( COM(2010)0586 ),
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Komisije iz leta 2007, naslovljenega „Smernice o programiranju, oblikovanju in upravljanju splošne proračunske podpore“ („Guidelines on the Programming, Design & Management of General Budget Support“),
– having regard to the Commission’s 2007 document entitled ‘Guidelines on the Programming, Design & Management of General Budget Support’,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije iz leta 2008 „Proračunska pomoč: učinkovit način financiranja razvoja?“,
– having regard to the Commission’s 2008 report entitled ‘Budget support: The effective way to finance development?’
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za gospodarski razvoj , finance in trgovino skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU o proračunski podpori kot obliki javne pomoči za razvoj držav AKP,
– having regard to the report of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly’s Committee on Economic Development, Finance and Trade on budgetary support as a means of delivering official development assistance (ODA) in ACP countries,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za proračun in Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7–0206/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0206/2011 ),
A. ker sta zmanjšanje revščine in, v končni fazi, njeno izkoreninjenje v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo glavni cilj razvojne politike Evropske unije,
A. whereas the reduction and ultimate eradication of poverty is the European Union development policy’s primary objective under the Lisbon Treaty,
B. ker je proračunska podpora postala ena najpomembnejših oblik pomoči,
B. whereas budget support has become one of the key forms of aid,
C. ker je za številne donatorje splošna in sektorska proračunska podpora sredstvo za spodbujanje partnerskih držav k privzemanju razvojne politike in trajnostnih reformnih procesov, za krepitev institucij in sistemov za nacionalno odgovornost ter spodbujanje rasti, zmanjševanje revščine in doseganje razvojnih ciljev,
C. whereas many donors consider general and sectoral budget support as a means of fostering partner countries’ ownership of development policies and lasting reform processes, strengthening national accountability institutions and systems, and facilitating growth, poverty reduction and the achievement of development objectives,
D. ker je nujen razvoj operativnih zmogljivosti, da bi sploh lahko zagotovili pogoje za dejavnosti na podlagi programov, vključno s proračunsko podporo ali drugimi modeli,
D. whereas operational capacity development is needed in order to create in the first place the preconditions for programme-based approaches, including budget support or more far-reaching models,
E. ker je mogoče s proračunsko podporo odpraviti nekatere pomanjkljivosti ustaljenega projektnega pristopa (visoki stroški transakcij, razdrobljeni vzporedni sistemi) in s tem povečati doslednost in učinkovitost ukrepov EU, kakor je poudarjeno v Lizbonski pogodbi,
E. whereas budget support helps to overcome certain weaknesses of the traditional project-based approach (high transaction costs, fragmented parallel systems) and thus increase the coherence and efficiency of EU measures, aims which are stressed in the Lisbon Treaty,
F. ker mora proračunska podpora prispevati k izboljšanju kakovosti in učinkovitosti pomoči, zlasti v zvezi z načeloma odgovornosti in usklajevanja, saj je s političnim dialogom med donatorji in koristniki prispevke mogoče prilagoditi prednostnim ciljem, ki jih določijo države v svojih nacionalnih strategijah za zmanjšanje revščine,
F. whereas budget support should help to improve the quality and effectiveness of aid, with particular reference to the principles of ownership and harmonisation, given that political dialogue between donors and recipients makes it possible to tailor contributions to the priorities countries have set in their national poverty reduction strategies,
G. ker ostaja „dinamični pristop“ v splošnem pogojevanju proračunske podpore kljub tveganjem, na katera je opozorilo Evropsko računsko sodišče v svojih poročilih o tej podpori, zelo pomemben instrument političnega dialoga; ker proračunska podpora kljub vsemu ne daje možnosti prostega ukrepanja,
G. whereas, despite the risks mentioned by the European Court of Auditors in its reports on budget support, the ‘dynamic approach’ in the general conditionality of budget support is still a very important instrument of political dialogue; whereas budget support must nevertheless under no circumstances be considered as a ‘blank cheque’,
H. ker se lahko vse zaveze, ki jih sprejmejo države prejemnice do svojih partnerjev, včasih težko uporabijo, saj donatorji včasih postavljajo nasprotujoče si pogoje,
H. whereas the range of commitments made by beneficiary countries to all their partners may, in some cases, make their use difficult, given that the conditions imposed by donors are sometimes contradictory,
I. ker se je Evropska unija pri sklepanju sporazumov o partnerstvu doslej ozirala bolj na kršenje človekovih pravic (t. i. pravic prve generacije) kot na kršenje socialnih, ekonomskih in kulturnih pravic (t. i. pravic druge generacije),
I. whereas the European Union has hitherto referred more frequently to violations of human rights (‘first-generation rights’) in partnership agreements rather than violations of social, economic and cultural rights (‘second-generation rights’),
J. ker bi se morali vsi donatorji posvetovati, da bi tako preprečili kakršno koli neskladje pri pogojevanju,
J. whereas all the donors should consult one another in order to prevent inconsistencies in conditionality,
K. ker je v skladu s členom 2(3) Lizbonske pogodbe cilj Evropske unije spodbujanje trajnostnega socialno-tržnega gospodarstva, kar bi moralo veljati tudi za razvojno politiko in politiko sosedskih odnosov,
K. whereas, pursuant to Article 2(3) of the Lisbon Treaty, it is an objective of the European Union to work for a sustainable social market economy, and whereas this should also apply with reference to development policy and relations under the neighbourhood policy,
L. ker je to, da partnerska vlada prevzame odgovornost za upravljanje proračuna, z vidika njenih državljanov bistven dejavnik njenih razvojih zmogljivosti, saj področje javnih financ nadzoruje parlament zadevne države, njena civilna družba pa je o vsem obveščena,
L. whereas making a partner government publicly accountable for its budgetary management is an essential factor in the country’s capacity building process through the exercise of scrutiny by its parliament and the provision of information to civil society in the field of public finance,
7. poudarja, da je sektorsko proračunsko podporo treba po potrebi bolj ciljno uporabiti za pomoč osnovnim socialnim sektorjem, med drugim za zdravstvo, izobraževanje, pomoč najbolj ranljivim osebam ter zlasti invalidom;
Stresses the need to use sectoral budget support wherever appropriate in order to ensure better targeting of basic social sectors, particularly health, education and assistance for the most vulnerable groups, especially persons with disabilities;
9. opozarja, da je na področju proračunske podpore vloga Evropska unija inovativna, ter poudarja dodano vrednost Evropske komisije kot izvedenca na tem področju;
Draws attention to the innovative role played by the EU in the field of budget support and the added value which the Commission brings, owing to its expertise in this area;
15. poudarja, da je treba okrepiti tako nadzorne mehanizme Komisije kot tudi parlamentarni nadzor in obveščanje civilne družbe v državah prejemnicah proračunske podpore; hkrati poudarja, da je treba pred kakršnim koli izplačilom sredstev vzpostaviti optimalen nadzor nad javnimi financami držav prejemnic;
Stresses the need to strengthen both the Commission’s monitoring mechanisms and parliamentary scrutiny and the provision of information to civil society in countries in receipt of budget support; stresses also that optimum procedures must be established for auditing the public finances of recipient countries as a precondition for any disbursement of funds;
17. poziva, naj bo proračunska pomoč pogojena z demokratičnim parlamentarnim nadzorom nad proračunom držav prejemnic; poziva k veliki udeležbi parlamentov in posvetovanju s civilno družbo v partnerskih državah, da se zagotovi demokratično odločanje o porabi sredstev proračunske podpore;
Calls for budget support to be made contingent on democratic parliamentary scrutiny of the budget in recipient countries; calls for the broad participation of parliaments and consultation of civil society in partner countries, so as to ensure that decisions about the use of budget support funds can be taken democratically;
21. poudarja, da je pomembno, da je razvojna pomoč EU učinkovita; poziva, naj se na ravni EU razvijejo neodvisni sistemi ocenjevanja in sistemi za pritožbe za vse, ki jih zadeva pomoč EU, ter k podpiranju mehanizmov odgovornosti v državah samih;
Emphasises the importance of the effectiveness of EU development aid; calls on developing EU-level independent evaluation systems and a complaints mechanism open to those affected by EU aid, as well as supporting in-country accountability mechanisms;
33. meni, da mora, ker je uporaba proračunske podpore pomembna strateška odločitev v odnosu Unije do partnerskih držav, za opredelitev pogojev upravičenosti za to obliko pomoči veljati člen 290 PDEU (delegirani akti) in s tem Svetu in Parlamentu kot sozakonodajalcema podeliti polna pooblastila soodločanja pri njenem sprejetju, po potrebi tudi pravico do razveljavitve delegiranega akta;
Considers that, since the use of budget support is an important strategic decision in the Union’s relation with its partner countries, Article 290 TFEU (delegated acts) must apply to the definition of the eligibility criteria for this aid modality, giving the Council and Parliament, as co-legislators, full codecision powers over its adoption, including – if necessary – the right of revocation of the delegated act;
Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 11/2010: Kako je Komisija upravljala splošno proračunsko podporo v državah AKP ter latinskoameriških in azijskih državah. popolnoma strinja s to oceno, vendar je še vedno treba oblikovati in uveljaviti zanesljiv okvir za obvladovanje tveganj;
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 11/2010: ‘The Commission’s management of general budget support in ACP, Latin American and Asian countries’. , is in full agreement with this assessment by highlighting that a sound risk management framework is still to be developed and implemented;
37. opozarja, da so za uspeh razvojnih strategij bistvene javne naložbe v javne dobrine, kot so izobraževanje, socialna varnost, infrastruktura in proizvodne zmogljivosti, zlasti glede malih kmetijskih gospodarstev in podpore lokalnim trgom;
Points out that public investments in public goods, such as education, social security, infrastructures and productive capacities, especially with regard to smallholder farming and support to local markets, are crucial for successful development strategies;
40. meni, da je predvidljivost tokov pomoči eden najpomembnejših dejavnikov za zagotavljanje kakovostne porabe, saj partnerskim državam omogoča, da dolgoročno načrtujejo porabo in podprejo izboljšave sektorskih politik; se zavzema za to, da bi bilo treba tak pristop okrepiti s fiskalnimi politikami partnerskih držav in uporabo domačih prihodkov, s čimer bi se morala dolgoročno zmanjšati odvisnost od pomoči;
Considers the predictability of aid flows to be one of the most important factors for ensuring the quality of spending, as it enables the partner countries to undertake long-term expenditure planning and to sustain improvements in sectoral policies; advocates that such an approach be reinforced by partner countries’ fiscal policies and mobilisation of domestic revenue which, in the long term, should reduce aid dependency;
44. poziva države v razvoju in Komisijo, naj spodbujajo sodelovanje v razvoju v skladu z ustreznimi določbami sporazuma iz Cotonouja ter členov 19 in 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006, zlasti kar zadeva spodbujanje civilne družbe in lokalnih ter regionalnih oblasti in posvetovanje z njimi;;
Encourages developing countries and the Commission to promote participatory development, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Cotonou Agreement and of Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006, in particular with regard to the promotion and consultation of civil society and local and regional authorities;
Sprejeta besedila z dne 3 februarja 2011, P78TC2-COD(2010)0059. ;
Texts adopted, 3 February 2011, P7_TC2-COD(2010)0059. ;
48. meni, da imajo z nafto in minerali bogate države zmožnosti za financiranje lastnega razvoja in boja proti revščini, če zagotovijo pregleden davčni sistem in pravično razdelitev bogastva;
Considers that oil and mineral rich countries have the potential to finance their own development and fight against poverty through transparent tax collection systems and fair redistribution of wealth;
51. ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj od nadzora nad vložki preide k preverjanju rezultatov glede na kazalnike, in sicer z izboljšanjem sistema poročanja s poudarkom na učinkovitosti programov;
Reiterates its previous calls on the Commission to move from control over inputs to the checking of results against indicators, by improving its reporting system so that it concentrates on the effectiveness of the programmes;
53. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj vzpostavijo javni register, v katerem bodo pregledno navedeni sporazumi o proračunski podpori, postopki in razvojni kazalniki, s čimer bi okrepili domače demokratične institucije in poskusili zagotoviti vzajemno odgovornost;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to create a public register in which budget support agreements, procedures and development indicators are transparently listed, with a view to reinforcing the domestic democratic institutions and to ensuring mutual accountability;
59. poziva Evropsko unijo in njene države članice, naj še naprej spodbujajo in ohranjajo svojo finančno podporo ter hkrati zagotovijo svetovanje za tehnokratsko upravljanje javnih financ;
Calls on the EU and its Member States to continue to promote and preserve their financial support and at the same time to provide consultative support for technocratic management of public finances;
Proračunska podpora je prenos finančnih virov agencije za zunanje financiranje v državno blagajno partnerske države, pri čemer mora slednja spoštovati dogovorjene plačilne pogoje.
Budget support is the transfer of financial resources from an external funding agency to the national treasury of a partner country, subject to the latter’s compliance with agreed conditions for payment.
Tako prejeti finančni viri so del splošnih virov partnerske države in se posledično uporabljajo v skladu s sistemom upravljanja javnih financ partnerske države.
The funds thus received are part of the partner country’s overall resources, and are consequently used in accordance with its public finance management system.
Čeprav se proračunska podpora dodeljuje že dolgo – že vse od Marshallovega načrta, se je začela splošno uporabljati v osemdesetih in devetdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja, ko so Svetovna banka in različna dvostranska sodelovanja začela nuditi proračunsko podporo v obliki plačilnobilančne pomoči.
Although budget support has been granted for some time (since the Marshall Plan, in fact), it became popular in the 1980s and 1990s when the World Bank and various bilateral cooperation structures began to provide such support in the form of balance-of-payments aid.
Drugi val proračunske podpore, ki je trajal od leta 2000 do leta 2005, je uvedel nov usklajen pristop k splošni proračunski podpori.
A second wave of such support in the period from 2000 to 2005 introduced a new, coordinated approach based on general budget support.
Ta oblika proračunske podpore je bila namenjena podpiranju politik in strategij partnerskih držav, da bi se poglobila pojma lastne odgovornosti in okrepljenega sodelovanja.
This form of budget support was intended to further the policies and strategies of partner countries with a view to developing the concepts of ownership and closer partnership more fully.
Sedaj pa je proračunska podpora najučinkovitejši način za doseganje ciljev pariškega načrta in načrta za ukrepanje iz Akre.
Lastly, budget support is now becoming established as the most effective means of achieving the objectives of the Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda.
EU zagotavlja proračunsko podporo samo državam, ki izpolnjujejo naslednja tri merila za upravičenost: a) ki že izvajajo ali oblikujejo (a) natančno opredeljeno nacionalno politiko in strategijo razvoja; (b) stabilnostno naravnan makroekonomski okvir; (c) verodostojen in ustrezen program za izboljšanje upravljanja javnih financ.
The EU grants budget support solely to countries in which the following three elements are in place or in the process of being put in place: a) a well-defined national development policy and strategy, b) a stability-oriented macroeconomic framework and c) a credible and appropriate programme for improving public finance management.
V obdobju 2003–2009 je Evropska komisija prevzela obveznosti za proračunsko podporo za več kot 13 milijard EUR (okrog 25 % vseh prevzetih obveznosti v tem obdobju).
Over the 2003-2009 period the Commission made budget support commitments totalling more than EUR 13 billion (about 25% of all commitments in that period).
Okrog 56 % prevzetih obveznosti je bilo za afriške, karibske in pacifiške (AKP) države, 24 % za države v soseščini, 8 % za Azijo, 6 % za Latinsko Ameriko in 5 % za Južno Afriko.
About 56% of these commitments were made in ACP (Africa, Caribbean and Pacific) countries, 24% in countries covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy, 8% in Asia, 6% in Latin America and 5% in South Africa.
Vpliv proračunske podpore: zaenkrat nejasni rezultati
Impact of budget support: results unclear as yet
V oceni iz leta 2006
The 2006 evaluation of budget support in Burkina Faso, Malawi, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Uganda, Rwanda and Vietnam commissioned by the OECD Development Assistance Committee
IDD idr. „Skupna ocena splošne proračunske podpore 1994–2004“, maj 2006 , v okviru katere je bila pregledana proračunska podpora Burkini Faso, Malaviju, Mozambiku, Nikaragvi, Ugandi, Ruandi in Vietnamu, naročil pa jo je Odbor za razvojno pomoč OECD, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je proračunska podpora pozitivno vplivala na učinkovito ravnanje z javnofinančnimi izdatki ter na zmogljivost vlad, zlasti na področju upravljanja javnih financ.
IDD and Associates, ‘A Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support 1994-2004’, May 2006. concluded that budget support had had a positive impact in terms of the efficient use of public funds and building governments’ capacity, including in the area of public finance management.
V oceni je bilo ugotovljeno tudi, da je imela proračunska podpora pozitivne učinke na usklajevanje in približevanje ter na krepitev privzemanja politik in odgovornosti vlade.
The evaluation also found that budget support had positive effects in terms of harmonisation, alignment and greater government ownership and accountability.
Poleg tega so nedavne neodvisne ocene programov Evropske komisije za države na splošno potrdile njen pomen in priporočile njeno nadaljnje zagotavljanje.
In addition, recent independent evaluations of the Commission’s country programmes have generally confirmed the value of budget support and recommended its continuation.
Vendar pa so v ocenah izraženi zadržki glede učinkov proračunske podpore na zmanjšanje revščine in utrjevanje demokracije v državah, ki jo prejemajo.
However, these evaluations voice a number of reservations about the impact of budget support in terms of reducing poverty and strengthening democracy in recipient countries.
Na splošno je težko oceniti učinek proračunske podpore na zmanjšanje revščine in druge kazalnike razvojih ciljev tisočletja.
Generally speaking, it is difficult to assess the impact of budget support on poverty reduction and other key MDG indicators.
Ostajajo pa tudi mogoča tveganja, povezana s proračunsko podporo: večje nihanje podpore, zapleteno spremljanje, boleče prilagajanje davkov v primeru prekinitev podpore.
At the same time, there are still potential risks associated with budget support, such as greater aid volatility, cumbersome monitoring and painful fiscal adjustments in the event that support is suspended.
V zadnjem primeru so posledice za revno prebivalstvo lahko pogubne, zlasti če so periodični stroški za učitelje, zdravstvene delavce ali nakup zdravil delno odvisni od zunanje pomoči.
The suspension of aid can have disastrous consequences for poor populations, especially if the payment of certain fixed costs such as teachers’ and health workers’ salaries or the purchase of medicines is partly dependent on external aid.
Ukinitev proračunske podpore v državi prejemnici pa ima posledice tudi v sosednjih državah.
The suspension of budget support to a recipient country also has an impact on neighbouring countries.
Ne vedno usklajeni pogoji za pridobitev podpore
Eligibility criteria that are not necessarily coherent
Države prejemnice so upravičene do podpore, če dosežejo dovolj visoko stopnjo lastne odgovornosti na področju boja proti revščini, makroekonomskega upravljanja, upravljanja javnih financ in političnega upravljanja.
In order to be eligible, recipient countries must have attained a sufficient degree of ownership in the fields of poverty reduction, macroeconomic management, public finance management and governance.
V praksi so med državami, ki prejemajo proračunsko podporo, velike razlike.
In practice, significant differences have been observed among those countries receiving budget support.
Ocene kažejo, da je bil občutek lastne odgovornosti močan in makroekonomske razmere trdne v Ugandi, Vietnamu in Ruandi, v Malaviju, Mozambiku in Burkini Faso pa so bili šibki.
According to the evaluations, Uganda, Vietnam and Rwanda had a strong sense of ownership and a sound macroeconomic situation, unlike Malawi, Mozambique and Burkina Faso.
Pojavljata se dva pomisleka: prvi je, da bi utegnila izbira držav prejemnic proračunske podpore temeljiti na zaupanju donatorjev v politike ali voditelje držav, ki so na položaju, čeprav glede na dogovorjena merila nekatere države niso „pripravljene“.
Two issues arise: the first is that countries may be selected to receive budget support on the basis of donors’ confidence in their political leadership or the incumbent head of state, even though some of them are not ‘ready’ according to the criteria laid down.
Drugi pomislek je, da se za upravljanje proračunske podpore zdi, da je bistveno povezano z diplomatskimi in (geo)političnimi vidiki ter „osebnimi“ stiki, za katere javnost ne ve, saj je uradna utemeljitev zanjo omejena na tehnične vidike.
The second issue is that budget support appears to be managed essentially on the basis of diplomatic and (geo)political considerations and ‘personal’ relationships that are not openly acknowledged, given that the official basis for such support is confined to technical considerations.
Zato se lahko politični značaj splošne proračunske podpore še okrepi in postane celo tvegan.
As a result, general budget support may become even more political in nature, possibly to a dangerous extent.