natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta sklep od 1. julija 2011 nadomešča Konvencijo o uporabi informacijske tehnologije za carinske namene, Protokol z dne 12. marca 1999 glede področja pranja premoženjske koristi v Konvenciji o uporabi informacijske tehnologije za carinske namene in vključitvi registrske številke prevoznega sredstva v Konvencijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu "Protokol glede področja pranja premoženjske koristi) ter Protokol, z dne 8. maja 2003, ki na podlagi člena 34 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji spreminja Konvencijo o uporabi informacijske tehnologije v carinske namene glede vzpostavitve identifikacijske podatkovne baze carinskih datotek ( v nadaljnjem besedilu " Protokol o vzpostavitve identifikacijske podatkovne baze carinskih datotek").
This Decision replaces the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes, as well as the Protocol of 12 March 1999 on the scope of the laundering of proceeds in the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes and the inclusion of the registration number of the means of transport in the Convention(hereinafter referred to as the "protocol on the scope of the laundering of proceeds") and the Protocol of 8 May 2003 established in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, amending, as regards the creation of a customs files identification database, the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes (hereinafter referred to as the "Protocol on the creation of a customs files identification database), with effect from 1 July 2011 .
Konvencija in protokoli iz prvega odstavka v skladu s tem prenehajo veljati z dnem začetka uporabe tega sklepa.
T he Convention and protocols referred to in the first paragraph shall therefore cease to be in force from the date of application of th is D ecision.
Razen, če je v tem sklepu določeno drugače, se vsi izvedbeni ukrepi Konvencije o uporabi informacijske tehnologije za carinske namene ter Protokola glede področja pranja premoženjske koristi in Protokola o vzpostavitve identifikacijske podatkovne baze carinskih datotek razveljavijo z ….
Unless otherwise provided in this Decision, measures implementing the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes and the respective protocols on the scope of the laundering of proceeds and on the creation of a customs files identification database shall be repealed with effect from ... .
Razen, če je v tem sklepu določeno drugače, se vsi izvedbeni ukrepi Konvencije o uporabi informacijske tehnologije za carinske namene ter Protokola glede področja pranja premoženjske koristi in Protokola o vzpostavitvi identifikacijske podatkovne baze carinskih datotek razveljavijo s 1. julijem 2011 .
Unless otherwise provided in this Decision, measures implementing the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes and the respective protocols on the scope of the laundering of proceeds and on the creation of a customs files identification database shall be repealed with effect from 1 July 2011 .
Vse spore med državami članicami glede razlage ali uporabe tega sklepa mora na začetni stopnji preučiti Svet v skladu s postopkom, določenim v naslovu VI Pogodbe, da bi se dosegla rešitev.
Any dispute between Member States on the interpretation or application of this Decision shall, in an initial stage, be examined by the Council in accordance with the procedure set out in Title VI of the Treaty on European Union with a view to reaching a solution.
Če se rešitve ne doseže v šestih mesecih, lahko stranka v sporu zadevo posreduje Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti.
If no solution is found within six months, the matter will be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by a party to the dispute.
Uporablja se od ….
It shall apply from ... .
Uporablja se od 1. julija 2011 .
It shall apply from 1 July 2011 .
Francoska republika je predstavila pobudo za sprejetje sklepa Sveta o uporabi informacijske tehnologije za carinske namene.
The French Republic presented an initiative with a view to the adoption of a Council Decision on the use of information technology for customs purposes.
S pobudo želi, da se Konvencija o uporabi informacijske tehnologije za carinske namene z dne 26. julija 1995 (Konvencija CIS) nadomesti s sklepom Sveta in se uskladi z Uredbo (ES) št. 766/2008 z dne 9. julija 2008 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 515/97 z dne 13. marca 1997 o medsebojni pomoči med upravnimi organi držav članic in sodelovanju med njimi in Komisijo zaradi zagotavljanja pravilnega izvajanja carinske in kmetijske zakonodaje.
It is argued that the aim of the initiative is to replace the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes of 26 July 1995 (CIS Convention) by a Council Decision and bring it in line with the Regulation 766/2008 of 9 July 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 515/97 of 13 March 1997 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters.
Čeprav poročevalec razume, da želijo države članice vzpostaviti učinkovit sistem boja proti vsem oblikam nezakonitega trgovanja, se mu zdi obžalovanja vredno, da se države članice odločajo za takšne ukrepe v naglici pred ratifikacijo Lizbonske pogodbe.
While the rapporteur understands the Member States' desire to construct an effective system for combating all forms of illegal trade he finds it regrettable that such measures should be decided in a hurry by the Member States prior to ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.
Tako ravnanje ustvarja vtis, da poskuša Svet Evropske unije zavestno sprejeti bistvene odločitve, še preden bo imel Evropski parlament možnost opraviti svojo vlogo v postopku soodločanja.
This gives the impression that the Council of the European Union is consciously seeking to take key decisions before the European Parliament is in a position to be involved by codecision.
Poročevalec priznava, da se je besedilo od začetne različice precej spremenilo in še zlasti odobrava prizadevanja Sveta za posodobitev ukrepov varovanja podatkov.
The rapporteur acknowledges that the text has undergone important changes since the initial version and he especially welcomes the efforts of the Council to update the data protection measures.
Meni pa, da Svet v zadnji različici besedila še ne izvaja v celoti priporočil evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov in skupnega nadzornega organa za carinski informacijski sistem.
Nevertheless, he believes that in its latest version of the text the Council has not yet sufficiently implemented the recommendations of the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Customs Joint Supervisory Authority.
Poročevalec natančneje meni, da je pomanjkljivo razloženo naslednje:
The rapporteur specifically considers that clarification is lacking regarding
· resnično prepričljiva in izčrpna utemeljitev potrebe po posodobitvi obstoječega carinskega sistema,
· a fully convincing and exhaustive justification for the necessity of updating the existing customs system,
· razlaga za podelitev dostopa Europolu in Eurojustu,
· an explanation for giving access to Europol and Eurojust,
· obveznosti držav članic glede obveščanja in nadzora,
· Member States' information and supervisory obligations,
· jasna omejitev namena zbiranja in uporabe podatkov, med drugim tudi v zvezi z namero, da bi imela Europol in Eurojust pravico dostopanja do teh podatkov,
· clear purpose limitation regarding the collection and use of the data, with respect inter alia to the intention of giving Europol and Eurojust the right to access these data,
· skladnost z obstoječimi pravili schengenskega informacijskega sistema in vizumskega informacijskega sistema,
· compliance with existing Schengen Information System and Visa Information System regulations,
· ponovna uporaba podatkov, zbranih v mednarodnem okviru,
· re-use of the data collected in an international context,
· sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta in drugih akterjev,
· the involvement of the European Parliament and other actors,
· določbe za revizije sklepa, ki bodo morebiti potrebne.
· provisions for any revision of the decision that may be required.
Zaradi osebnega značaja in občutljivosti podatkov je treba sprejeti ukrepe za pregledno dostopanje do carinskega informacijskega sistema v skladu s pravili, ki veljajo za podobne informacijske sisteme, in s tristebrnim sistemom, pa tudi z morebitnim sistemom brez stebrov.
Given that the data concerned are personal, and thus sensitive, steps must be taken to ensure that access to the customs information system is transparent, in compliance with similar information system regulations and consistent within the three-pillar as well as a possible non-pillar system.
Omemba morebitne uporabe podatkov „za upravne ali druge namene “ v členu 8 ni v skladu z načelom omejitve namena zbiranja podatkov in je v nasprotju z dosledno izraženimi stališči Evropskega parlamenta, da se podatki lahko uporabljajo le za natančno določene in omejene namene, ki jih ureja pravni okvir.
The reference in Article 8 to the possible use of the data for 'administrative or other purposes' does not comply with the principle of the purpose limitation of data collection and is contrary to the views consistently expressed by the European Parliament that data should only be used for well defined and clearly limited purposes governed by the legal framework.
Iz podobnih razlogov in zlasti zaradi pomanjkanja učinkovitega zastopanja interesov evropskih državljanov (v tem primeru glede pravice do prejemanja informacij in izbrisa podatkov), poročevalec močno odsvetuje, da bi imele države nečlanice ali mednarodne organizacije dostop do podatkov, zbranih v okviru te pobude za sklep.
For similar reasons, and particularly the lack of effective representation of the interests of European citizens (in this case as regards their entitlement to receive information and have data deleted), the rapporteur advises strongly against making the data collected in the context of this initiative for a decision available to non-Member States or international organizations.
In končno, bistveno je tudi, da bodo ta sklep in vsi ukrepi držav članic, ki mu bodo sledili, predmet rednih pregledov.
Finally, it is also essential that this decision and any ensuing measures taken by the Member States be subject to regular review.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi s strani Evropske skupnosti Sporazuma o pristopu Evropske skupnosti h Konvenciji o mednarodnem železniškem prometu (COTIF) z dne 9. maja 1980, kakor je bila spremenjena z Vilenskim protokolom z dne 3. junija 1999
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Agreement on the Accession of the European Community to the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) of 9 May 1980, as amended by the Vilnius Protocol of 3 June 1999
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2009)0441 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2009)0441 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 71 in prvega stavka prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 71 and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0164/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0164/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7‑0053/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7‑0053/2009 ),
Medvladna organizacija za mednarodni železniški promet (OTIF) obstaja od 1. maja 1985.
The Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) was set up on 1 May 1985.
Mednarodnopravna podlaga je konvencija z 9. maja 1980 (COTIF).
The organisation’s basis under international law is the Convention of 9 May 1980 (COTIF).
Prednostne naloge delovanja:
Its activities focus on:
- pogodb o mednarodnem železniškem potniškem in tovornem prometu (CIV in CIM),
- contracts of carriage for the international carriage of passengers and goods (CIV and CIM),
- prevoza nevarnega blaga (RID),
- carriage of dangerous goods (RID),
- pogodb o uporabi vagonov (CUV),
- contracts for use of vehicles (CUV),
- pogodbe o uporabi železniške infrastrukture (CUI),
- contract for the use of railway infrastructure (CUI),
- potrditve tehničnih standardov in sprejetja enotnih tehničnih predpisov za železniški material (APTU),
- validation of technical standards and adoption of uniform technical specifications for railway equipment (APTU),
- postopkov za tehnično soglasje za železniška vozila in drug železniški material, ki se uporablja v mednarodnem prometu (ATMF),
- procedure for the technical licensing of railway vehicles and other railway equipment used in international traffic (ATMF);
OTIF ima 43 članic (vse evropske države razen držav, nastalih po razpadu Sovjetske zveze, z izjemo baltskih držav in Ukrajine, ter štiri države Bližnjega vzhoda in tri severnoafriške države).
Forty-three States are currently members of OTIF (all the European States, excluding the successor States of the Soviet Union, but including the Baltic States and the Ukraine, as well as four Middle Eastern States and three North African States).
Enotno pravo, ki ga je uvedla OTIF, trenutno velja za mednarodne železniške prevoze po okoli 240.000 km železniških prog in dodatne prevoze po več tisoč kilometrih v tovornem in potniškem prometu po cestah, morju in celinskih plovnih poteh
International carriage by rail on around 240 000 km of railway lines and the complementary carriage of freight and passengers on several thousand kilometres of roads, shipping routes and inland waterways are currently covered by the uniform law created by OTIF.
Evropska skupnost ima izključno pristojnost ali pa si s svojimi državami članicami deli pristojnost na področjih, ki jih ureja Konvencija o mednarodnem železniškem prometu (v nadaljevanju: COTIF) z dne 9. maja 1980, kakor je bila spremenjena z Vilenskim protokolom z dne 3. junija 1999.
The European Community has exclusive competence or shared competence with its Member States in the areas covered by the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) of 9 May 1980, as amended by the Vilnius Protocol of 3 June 1999.
Čimprejšnji pristop Skupnosti k tej konvenciji je zelo pomemben za nadaljnji razvoj železniške interoperabilnosti, ne samo v Skupnosti, ampak tudi med Skupnostjo in sosednjimi državami.
It is therefore of great importance that the Community should sign the Convention at the earliest possible opportunity in order further to develop railway interoperability both within the Community and between the Community and its neighbours.
Evropski parlament je o tem že izrazil svoje stališče, ko je 10. marca 2004 dal pozitivno mnenje o prvem predlogu Komisije iz leta 2003 o pristopu Evropske skupnosti k COTIF.
The European Parliament expressed a view on the matter on 10 March 2004 when it delivered an opinion approving the 2003 Commission proposal for the European Community’s accession to COTIF.
Naknadno se je izkazalo, da drugi odstavek 3. člena COTIF, ki naj bi zagotovil skladnost med pravnima sistema Skupnosti in OTIF, te skladnosti dejansko ni ustrezno zagotavljal.
It subsequently emerged, however, that Article 3(2) of COTIF, which was intended to ensure compatibility between the respective Community and OTIF legal regimes, did not in fact do this adequately.
Pravni pregled COTIF in njenih dodatkov je potrdil, da med pravim redom Skupnosti in COTIF obstajajo številne razlike, tako v zvezi s pravili o sodni pristojnosti iz COTIF (12. in 28. člen) kot tudi s pravili v nekaterih dodatkih (E, F in G).
A legal review of the COTIF and its Appendices confirmed that a number of divergences existed between Community law and COTIF, relating both to the rules on jurisdiction in the COTIF (Articles 12 and 28) and to the rules in some of the Appendices (E, F and G).
Ta vprašanja so zdaj razrešena s potrebnimi spremembami COTIF (sprejete na generalni skupščini OTIF 9. in 10. septembra 2009).
These issues have now been resolved by making the necessary changes to COTIF (adopted at the OTIF General Assembly on 9-10 September 2009).
Spremembe bodo začele veljati 12 mesecev po tem, ko bo OTIF o njih obvestila svoje države članice.
The changes will take effect 12 months after OTIF gives notice of them to its Member States
Skupnost zato v zvezi s svojim pristopom k COTIF v skladu s 42. členom COTIF poda izjavo o neuporabi dodatkov E, F in G k COTIF.
Upon accession the Community will therefore make a declaration in accordance with Article 42 of COTIF concerning the non-application of its Appendices E, F and G.
Sporazum o pristopu Evropske skupnosti h Konvenciji o mednarodnem železniškem prometu (COTIF) z dne 9. maja 1980, kakor je bila spremenjena z Vilenskim protokolom z dne 3. junija 1999
Agreement on the Accession of the European Community to the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) of 9 May 1980, as amended by the Vilnius Protocol of 3 June 1999
o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Tobiasa Pflügerja
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Tobias Pflüger
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Tobiasa Pflügerja za zaščito njegove imunitete, ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 5. maja 2009,
– having regard to the request by Tobias Pflüger for defence of his immunity announced in plenary sitting on 5 May 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svojega sklepa z dne 16. maja 2006 o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Tobiasu Pflügerju
– having regard to its decision of 16 May 2006 on the request for waiver of the immunity of Tobias Pflüger
– ob upoštevanju členov 6(3) in 7 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7–0054/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7‑0054/2009 ),
A. ker se je Parlament že odločil odvzeti imuniteto Tobiasu Pflügerju s sklepom z dne 16. maja 2006, ki zadeva ista dejstva,
A. whereas Parliament has already waived Tobias Pflüger's immunity by its decision of 16 May 2006 concerning the same set of facts,
B. ker se po pregledu zdi, da niti sodba proti Tobiasu Pflügerju z dne 2. marca 2009 niti zahteva javnega tožilca z dne 15. aprila 2009 za zvišanje kazni, ki mu je bila izrečena, ne ogroža pravic Parlamenta,
B. whereas it appears after examination that Parliament's prerogatives are threatened neither by the judgment against Tobias Pflüger of 2 March 2009 nor by the request of the public prosecutor on 15 April 2009 to increase the penalty imposed on him,
Dejstva in postopek
The facts and procedure
Dejstva z dne 12. februarja 2005, kot so navedena v sodbi sodišča prve stopnje, se nanašajo na proteste proti vsakoletni varnostni konferenci v Münchnu [ang.
The facts as laid down in the judgment at first instance date back to 12 February 2005 and relate to a counter-demonstration staged against the annual "Munich Security Conference".
Nekaj policistov je postavilo kordon med sodelavci, ki so izvajali aretacije, in protestniki, med katerimi so nekateri želeli izzvati spopade.
Some of the police officers formed a barrier between the officers making the arrests and the demonstrators, some of which were spoiling for a fight.
· Tobias Pflüger se je kot udeleženec protesta zapletel z dvema policistoma v kordonu, ki je varoval druge policiste, ki so zasliševali nekatere protestnike.
· Tobias Pflüger participated in the counter-demonstration and in this context interacted with two police officers forming part of the barrier protecting further police officers who were in the process of questioning certain demonstrators.
Izrecno se je skliceval na svojo poslansko izkaznico in večkrat zahteval, naj ga na podlagi njegovega statusa poslanca Evropskega parlamenta spustijo na drugo stran kordona.
He specifically made use of his Member's badge and repeatedly asked to be let through the protective barrier by virtue of his position as an MEP.
Pri tem naj bi, čeprav Tobias Pflüger to zanika, uporabil tudi zmerjanje in s tem razžalil dva policista.
Although this was denied by Tobias Pflüger, he was also found to have resorted to name-calling, thus insulting the dignity of the two police officers.
20. oktobra 2005 je glavni državni tožilec (območje München I ) Evropski parlament zaprosil za odvzem imunitete Tobias Pflügerju, da bi lahko proti njemu sprožil kazenski postopek zaradi suma kaznivih dejanj:
On 20 October 2005, the Chief Public Prosecutor ( München I area) requested the Parliament to waive Tobias Pflüger's immunity, so that he could commence criminal proceedings against him for the suspected offences of:
· razžalitve ( Beleidigung ) dveh policistov in,
· insulting behaviour ( Beleidigung ) towards the two police officers, and
· če bo ocena, ki je v izdelavi, pokazala, da poškodbe enega od policistov niso bile neznatne, povzročitve telesne poškodbe ( Körperverletzung ).
· if the pending evaluation of the harm caused to one police officer demonstrated that that harm was not insignificant, assault and battery ( Körperverletzung )
28. aprila 2006 je Odbor za pravne zadeve (poročevalec Francesco Enrico Speroni) sprejel poročilo, v katerem priporoča odvzem imunitete Tobiasu Pflügerju, pri čemer je upošteval, da se za primer uporablja člen 10(1)(a) Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti iz leta 1965, da za politično dejavnost Tobiasa Pflügerja ni bilo negativnih posledic in da ni dokazov za fumus persecutionis .
On 28 April 2006, the Committee on Legal Affairs (rapporteur: Francesco Enrico Speroni) adopted a report recommending the waiver of Tobias Pflüger's immunity, considering that the case fell under Article 10(1)(a) of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of 1965, that Tobias Pflüger's political activity was not negatively affected, and that there was no evidence of fumus persecutionis.
16. maja 2006 je Parlament sprejel resolucijo o odvzemu imunitete Tobiasu Pflügerju.
On 16 May 2006, Parliament adopted a resolution waiving Tobias Pflüger's immunity.
Tobias Pflüger od 14. julija 2009 ni več poslanec Evropskega parlamenta.
As from 14 July 2009, Tobias Pflüger is no longer a Member of the European Parliament.
2. marca 2009 je občinsko sodišče v Münchnu ( Amtsgericht München ) Tobiasa Pflügerja spoznalo za krivega razžalitve ( Beleidigung ) v dveh primerih in mu naložilo denarno kazen
On 2 March 2009, the German court (Amtsgericht München) found Tobias Pflüger guilty of two cases of insulting behaviour ( Beleidigung ) and condemned him to a financial penalty
Izrečena je bila kazen v višini 12.000 EUR in plačilo stroškov. :
The fine amounted to € 12 000 plus costs. .
· Obtožba za poskus povzročitve telesne poškodbe enemu od policistov ( versuchte Körperverletzung ) je bila umaknjena.
· The charge relating to attempted assault and battery of one of the police officers ( versuchte Körperverletzung) was dropped.
· Pri določitvi kazni je sodnik kot olajševalno okoliščino izrecno upošteval dejstvo, da obtoženec nikoli prej ni bil kaznovan, kot oteževalno okoliščino pa to, da je Tobias Pflüger kot poslanec Evropskega parlamenta in s tem predstavnik ljudstva storil kaznivo dejanje zoper oba policista, in sicer v javnosti (glej spodnji izvleček).
· In determining the penalty, the judge expressly took into account as a mitigating factor the fact that the defendant had no previous conviction, and as an aggravating factor the fact that Tobias Pflüger, as a member of Parliament and therefore a representative of the people, committed the offence against both officials, and what is more, in public view (see extract below).
15. aprila 2009 se je državni tožilec pritožil zoper kazen, ki je bila izrečena Tobiasu Pflügerju, in zahteval, naj se ta poviša, „ker je bil obtoženec poslanec Evropskega parlamenta in si je v tej vlogi prizadeval uveljaviti določene privilegije“.
On 15 April 2009, the public prosecutor appealed against the penalty imposed on Tobias Pflüger, requesting that it be increased "because the defendant was a Member of the European Parliament and sought to claim privileges in this capacity".