natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dodatni stroški, ki jih bo direktiva naložila državam članicam, so predvsem neizogibni stroški zagotavljanja poštenih sojenj in preprečevanja nepravičnih obsodb in bodo v vsakem primeru povrnjeni zaradi nižjih stroškov pritožb in zamud.
Any extra costs that the Directive will impose on Member States are the irreducible cost of ensuring fair trials and avoiding miscarriages of justice and will in any case be balanced by fewer costly appeals and delays.
Vsaka resolucija o dobri praksi, ki bo morebiti sprejeta skupaj z direktivo, mora vključevati stroge praktične ukrepe, ki bodo okrepili izvajanje pravic iz direktive.
Any Resolution on best practice which might be adopted to accompany the Directive should include strong practical measures which will strengthen implementation of the rights laid down in the Directive.
Zavezanost standardom, določenim v Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, mora biti podlaga za medsebojno zaupanje, ki je pogoj za vzajemno priznavanje v pravosodnih zadevah v EU in predstavlja minimalne standarde, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati vse države članice EU.
Adherence to the standards set out in the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) must form the basis for the mutual trust upon which EU mutual recognition in judicial matters is contingent and represent the minimum standards below which no EU state must fall.
Pravice iz te direktive torej temeljijo na 5. členu (pravica do prostosti in osebne varnosti) in 6. členu (pravica do poštenega sojenja) konvencije.
The rights in this Directive are thus based on Articles 5 (on the right to liberty and security) and Article 6 (on the right to a fair trial) of the Convention.
Čeprav obstajajo okoliščine, na primer pri pridržanju duševno bolnih, ko se uporablja 5. člen konvencije, ne pa tudi ukrep EU, ga je primerno citirati.
Although there are situations to which Article 5 applies to which this EU measure does not, e.g. mental health detention, it is appropriate to cite it.
Ker želi Evropska unija ustvariti enotno območje pravice s skupnimi pravili in z intenzivnim sodelovanjem, morajo direktiva in drugi ukrepi, ki bodo sledili, ne le spoštovati EKČP, temveč jo tudi nadgrajevati v skladu z Listino EU o temeljnih pravicah, da bi povišali standarde EU za varovanje osumljenih in obdolžencev.
Since the EU is aiming to establish a single area of justice, with common rules and intensive cooperation, the Directive and other measures to follow must not only respect the ECHR but also build on it in accordance with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, in order to set EU standards for protection of suspects and defendants at a higher level.
To poročilo spreminja predlog držav članic na več načinov in med drugim vključuje:
This report amends the Member State proposal in several ways, including:
- sklicevanje na Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in EKČP,
- reference to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as well as the ECHR
- začetek izvajanja pravic ne šele takrat, ko pride do zaslišanja ali pridržanja, temveč ko se pojavi sum, pri katerem organi niso dolžni obvestiti osumljenca;
- applicability of the rights to be triggered not only by questioning or arrest but also through awareness of suspicion without the suspect having to be informed by the authorities;
- razširitev pravic na vse faze postopka, med njimi izrekanje kazni, pritožbe in pridržanje, vse do zaključka kazenskega postopka,
- extension of the rights to cover all phases of proceedings including sentencing, appeals and detention until criminal proceedings are finally concluded;
- določbo, da mora biti osumljenec pisno obveščen o svojih pravicah,
- specifying that the suspect should be made aware in writing of his rights,
- pomoč ljudem z motnjami v telesnem ali duševnem razvoju za nadomestitev pomanjkanja jezikovnih sposobnosti,
- support for persons to compensate for a lack of linguistic skills to extend to all those with physical or mental impairments
- tolmačenje pogovorov med osumljencem in odvetnikom in prevod pravnih nasvetov,
- interpretation of suspect-lawyer communications and translation of legal advice;
- prevedeno pisno gradivo, ki vključuje vse bistvene listine primera,
- written materials translated to include all the essential documents of the case
- pritožbe na sodni organ in vzpostavitev mehanizma za pritožbe,
- appeals to be to a judicial authority and a mechanism for complaints set up
- dodatne določbe o izobraževanju, preverjanju znanja in imenovanju tolmačev in prevajalcev,
- adding provisions on training, and on qualification and registration of interpreters and translators
- dodatne zaščitne ukrepe v zvezi s posnetki, ustreznim časom in zmogljivostmi ter procesnimi roki, ki upoštevajo potrebe tolmačenja in prevajanja.
- addition of further safeguards: on recording, adequate time and facilities, and procedural deadlines to take account of interpretation and translation needs.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o uporabi določb schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se navezujejo na schengenski informacijski sistem, v Republiki Bolgariji in Romuniji
on the draft Council decision on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (06714/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (06714/2010),
– ob upoštevanju člena 4(2) akta o pristopu z dne 25. aprila 2005
– having regard to Article 4 (2) of the Act of Accession of 25 April 2005
204. , v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7­0067/2010 ),
204 , pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7-0067/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7-0199/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee of Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0199/2010 ),
Svet je XXXX 2010 sklenil, da Republika Bolgarija in Romunija izpolnjujeta pogoje s tega področja.
"On XXXX 2010, the Council concluded that the conditions in this area had been fulfilled by the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania.
Zato je mogoče določiti datum, s katerim se schengenski pravni red, ki se navezuje na schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS), v teh dveh državah članicah lahko začne uporabljati.
It is therefore possible to set a date from which the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) may apply in those Member States."
Zato je mogoče določiti datum, s katerim se schengenski pravni red, ki se navezuje na schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS), v teh dveh državah članicah lahko začne uporabljati.
It is therefore possible to set a date from which the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) may apply in those Member States.
Vsaka od teh držav članic bi morala v obdobju šestih mesecev, ki se začne z datumom začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa, pisno obvestiti Evropski parlament in Svet o tem, kako nameravata ukrepati v odziv na priporočila, ki so vključena v ocenjevalna poročila in omenjena v odzivu ter jih je še treba uresničiti.
Each Member State concerned should inform the European Parliament and the Council in writing, in the course of the six - month period beginning on the date of entry into force of this Decision , o f the follow-up they intend to give to the recommendations contained in the evaluation reports and mentioned in the follow-up which are still to be implemented."
Romunija in Bolgarija sta sprejeli schengenski pravni red, ko sta leta 2007 pristopili k EU.
Romania and Bulgaria adopted the Schengen acquis when joining the EU in 2007.
V členu 4(2) akta o pristopu iz leta 2005 je določeno, da je treba s postopki ocenjevanja preveriti, ali sta novi državi članici izpolnili potrebne pogoje za uporabo vseh delov schengenskega pravnega reda (varstvo podatkov, schengenski informacijski sistem, zračne, kopenske in morske meje, policijsko sodelovanje ter vizumi), kar je predpogoj za to, da Svet lahko sprejme sklep o odpravi kontrol na notranjih mejah s tema državama članicama.
According to Article 4(2) of the Act of Acession, the verification through evaluation procedures that the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of the Schengen acquis (Data Protection, the Schengen Information System, Air Borders, Land Borders, Sea Borders, Police Cooperation and Visas) have been met by the new Member States is a precondition for the Council to decide on the abolition of checks at internal borders with those Member States.
Ocenjevanje vsake nove države članice bi se moralo začeti na zahtevo te države članice (izjava o pripravljenosti).
The evaluations for any new Member States should start following a request of the respective Member State (declaration of readiness).
Za njegovo izvajanje bi morala biti odgovorna delovna skupina za schengensko evalvacijo (SCH-EVAL), začeti pa bi se moralo z vprašalnikom o vseh delih schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se ga pošlje državi članici, in nadaljevati z ocenjevalnimi obiski.
They should be conducted under the responsibility of the Schengen Evaluation Working Group (SCH-EVAL), starting with a questionnaire to the Member State concerning all parts of the Schengen acquis and followed by evaluation visits.
Skupine strokovnjakov bi bilo treba napotiti do SIS, uradov SIRENE, na konzulate, na meje itd. in te bi morale pripraviti izčrpna poročila z opisi dejanskega stanja, ocenami in priporočili za dodatne ukrepe in kasnejše obiske.
Teams of experts should be send to the SIS, SIRENE bureaus, Consulates, to the Borders, etc., and should prepare exhaustive reports containing factual descriptions, assessments and recommendations which can require additional measures and follow-up visits.
V končnem poročilu bi moralo biti opredeljeno, ali nova država članica – po celovitem postopku ocenjevanja – izpolnjuje vse pogoje za uporabo pravnega reda v praksi.
The final report should establish whether the new Member State concerned, after being subject to a full evaluation procedure, fulfils all the preconditions for the practical application.
Pričujoči osnutek sklepa o uporabi določb v zvezi s schengenskim informacijskim sistemom v Bolgariji in Romuniji je prvi korak v smeri odprave kontrol na notranjih mejah EU z Bolgarijo in Romunijo.
The present draft decision concerning the application of the provisions relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) in Bulgaria and Romania is a very first step towards lifting checks at the EU internal borders to Bulgaria and Romania.
O odpravi kontrol na mejah bo Svet odločil v ločenem sklepu, ki ga bo sprejel v poznejši fazi po dodatnih ocenjevanjih.
The lifting of borders will be subject to a separate Council decision at a later state, following further evaluations.
Svet je pričujoči osnutek sklepa o uporabi določb v zvezi s schengenskim informacijskim sistemom v Bolgariji in Romuniji posredoval Evropskemu parlamentu.
The Council referred the present draft decision concerning the application of the provisions relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) in Bulgaria and Romania to the European Parliament.
V skladu z aktom o pristopu iz leta 2005 se te določbe uporabljajo le na podlagi sklepa Sveta, po posvetovanju s Parlamentom in po tem, ko se s schengenskim mehanizmom ocenjevanja oceni, če so v državi članici izpolnjeni pogoji za uporabo teh določb.
In accordance with the 2005 Act of Accession, these provisions shall only apply pursuant to a Council Decision, after consulting Parliament and after verification in accordance, through the Schengen evaluation mechanism, that the conditions for the application have been met in the Member State concerned.
Delovna skupina za schengensko evalvacijo v okviru Sveta je preverila, če Bolgarija in Romunija zagotavljata zadovoljive ravni varovanja podatkov, ter prišla do pozitivnih splošnih zaključkov.
The Schengen Evaluation Working Group within the Council has verified whether Bulgaria and Romania ensure satisfactory levels of data protection and came to an overall positive conclusion.
Zato je osnutek sklepa namenjen določitvi datuma, s katerim se bodo začele uporabljati določbe, povezane s schengenskim informacijski sistemom.
As a consequence, the draft decision aims at setting a date from which the provisions relating to the Schengen Information System will apply.
Za tem bo prišlo do prenosa resničnih podatkov iz SIS Bolgariji in Romuniji in ti bosta lahko z določenimi omejitvami vnašali podatke in uporabljali podatke iz SIS.
Subsequently, real SIS data will be transferred to Bulgaria and Romania, and they will be able to enter data and use SIS data, subject to certain restrictions.
Schengenska evalvacija Bolgarije in Romunije, kar zadeva varstvo podatkov
Schengen evaluation of Bulgaria and Romania with regard to data protection
Ocenjevanje pravilne uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda s strani Bolgarije in Romunije, kar zadeva varstvo podatkov, je potekalo od 27. do 30. aprila 2009, v skladu s pristojnostmi delovne skupine za schengensko evalvacijo.
The correct application by Bulgaria and Romania of the Schengen acquis in respect of data protection was evaluated from 27 to 30 April 2009, in accordance with the mandate of the Schengen Evaluation Working Group.
Glede Bolgarije je odbor strokovnjakov ugodno ocenil pobude različnih ministrstev za razvoj sistema, ki bo posameznikom, na katere se podatki nanašajo, zagotavljal celovite informacije o njihovih pravicah.
As regards Bulgaria, the committee of experts appreciated initiatives by different ministries in order to develop a scheme guaranteeing comprehensive information to data subjects on their rights.
Ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti so zadevale sprejemanje, izvajanje in uporabo ustrezne zakonodaje, zlasti v zvezi s priporočilom Sveta Evrope (87)15, ki ureja uporabo osebnih podatkov v policijskem sektorju, ter potrebo po poročilih o izvajanju pravic posameznikov, na katere se podatki nanašajo, in o dejavnosti Komisije za varstvo osebnih podatkov.
Shortcomings identified concerned the adoption, implementation and application of relevant legislation, especially concerning Council of Europe Recommendation (87)15 regulating the use of personal data in the police sector, and the need for reports concerning the execution of the rights of data subjects and on the activities of the Commission for the Protection of Personal Data (CPDP).
Po teh priporočilih je Bolgarija do januarja 2010 opravila potrebne pravne prilagoditve, da bi zagotovila popolno izvajanje priporočila Sveta Evrope (87)15.
By January 2010, following up to the recommendations, Bulgaria made the necessary legal amendments to ensure full implementation of Council of Europe Recommendation (87)15.
Kar zadeva pravice posameznikov, na katere se podatki nanašajo, je Bolgarija okrepila sodelovanje med Komisijo za varstvo osebnih podatkov in drugimi organi ter sprejela ukrepe za osveščanje javnosti, na primer z novim spletnim mestom.
As regards the rights of data subjects, Bulgaria has strengthened the cooperation between CPDP and other authorities and taken steps to raise public awareness, for example through a new website.
Ugotovljene slabosti so zadevale še nedokončano sprejetje dveh zakonov, ki bosta urejala obdelavo osebnih podatkov v povezavi s schengenskim informacijskim sistemom, prostore in sredstva nacionalnega nadzornega organa ter uvajanje rednih naključnih preverjanj v povezavi s schengenskimi podatki.
Weaknesses detected concerned the pending adoption adoption of two laws regulating the processing of personal data related to the SIS, the premises and resources of the National Supervisory Authority (NSAPDP) and the introduction of periodical or random checks in relation to Schengen data.
Kar zadeva prostore in sredstva nacionalnega nadzornega organa, se je Romunija zelo potrudila, da bi upoštevala priporočilo.
As regards the premises and resources of the National Supervisory Authority major efforts were made in order to comply with the recommendation.
Romunija je poročala tudi, da osebe, odgovorne za varstvo osebnih podatkov, opravljajo naključna notranja preverjanja izvajanja varnostnih ukrepov.
Romania also reported that the persons responsible for personal data protection performed random internal controls on the implementation of security measures.
Svet je 26. aprila 2010 sklenil, da so izpolnjeni pogoji na področju varstva podatkov in da ni nobene ovire za sprejetje sklepa Sveta o uporabi določb schengenskega pravnega reda v zvezi s schengenskim informacijskim sistemom in torej za vnos dejanskih podatkov SIS, takoj ko bosta Bolgarija in Romunija za to tehnično pripravljeni.
On 26 April 2010 the Council concluded that the conditions in the area of data protection were fulfilled and that nothing prevents the adoption of a Council Decision on the applications of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System and thus the loading of real SIS data, as soon as Bulgaria and Romania are technically ready to this end.
V skladu s časovnim načrtom SISone4ALL za priključitev Bolgarije in Romunije k SIS II z dne 9. marca 2010 se pričakuje, da bosta obe državi tehnično pripravljeni do oktobra 2010.
According to the SISone4ALL Roadmap for the connection of Bulgaria and Romania to the SIS II, from 9 March 2010, it is expected that both countries will be technically ready by October 2010.
Po prenosu dejanskih podatkov SIS Bolgariji in Romuniji bo delovna skupina za schengensko evalvacijo preverila pravilnost uporabe določb o SIS.
Once real SIS data has been transferred to Bulgaria and Romania, the Schengen Evaluation Working Group will verify the correct application of the provisions on the SIS.
V skladu s časovnim načrtom SISone4ALL za priključitev Bolgarije in Romunije k SIS II z dne 9. marca 2010 je ocenjevanje v zvezi s SIS za Bolgarijo predvideno od 22. do 26. novembra 2010, za Romunijo pa od 29. novembra do 3. decembra 2010.
According to the SISone4ALL Roadmap for the connection of Bulgaria and Romania to the SIS II of 9 March 2010, the evaluation on SIS is scheduled for Bulgaria to take place between 22 and 26 November 2010 and for Romania between 29 to 3 December 2010.
Bolgarija in Romunija sta zaprosili za vključitev v sistem SISOne4ALL namesto SISII
Bulgaria and Romania applying to join SISOne4ALL instead of SISII
Zaradi velikih zamud pri razvoju sistema SISII sta se Bolgarija in Romunija odločili, da ne bosta čakali na začetek delovanja sistema SISII (za katerega še vedno ni oprijemljivega časovnega načrta), temveč bosta zaprosili za vključitev v obstoječi sistem SISOne4ALL.
Due to the enormous delays in the development of the SISII, Bulgaria and Romania decided not to wait until the start of operations of the SISII (currently, still without a concrete timetable), but to apply to join the current SISOne4ALL.
V sedanjem sistemu SIS1+RE sta na voljo le dve prosti mesti, ki sta rezervirani za Združeno kraljestvo in Irsko.
Nevertheless, on the actual SIS1+RE there are only two slots available, but already reserved for UK and Ireland.
Pričakuje se, da bo težava s pomanjkanjem prostih mest rešena do konca avgusta letos, da bi se vsem novim državam omogočila pridružitev k sistemu SIS1+RE prek tehnične posodobitve, ki se izvaja na sedanjem sistemu in ki naj bi bila pripravljena pravočasno, da bi tema dvema državama omogočila priključitev k sistemu SIS ob upoštevanju sedanjega časovnega načrta.
This problem of unavailability of slots is expected to be solved by the end of August of this year, in order to allow any new country to join the SIS1+RE through the technical upgrade which is being made on the actual system and should be ready in time to allow these two countries to connect to the SIS respecting the current timetable.
Revizija schengenskega ocenjevalnega mehanizma
Revision of the Schengen evaluation mechanism
Marca 2009 je Komisija predložila predloga za spremembo schengenskega ocenjevalnega mehanizma KOM(2009)102, na podlagi člena 66 PES, in KOM(2009)105, na podlagi tako imenovanega tretjega stebra, torej členov 30 in 31 PEU.
In March 2009, the Commission had submitted proposals in order to amend the Schengen evaluation mechanism, COM(2009)102 , based on Article 66 EC, and COM(2009)105, based on the so-called third pillar, on Articles 30 and 31 EU Treaty.
Parlament je 20. oktobra 2009 zavrnil predloga Komisije in jo pozval, naj ju umakne ter predloži nova.
On 20 October 2009 Parliament rejected the Commission proposals, called on the Commission to withdraw them and to submit new proposals.
Utemeljitev Parlamenta je bila, da pravna podlaga predlogov, kot jo navaja Komisija, ne upošteva dovolj vloge Parlamenta pri območju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
Parliament argued that the legal bases for the proposals, as suggested by the Commission, did not sufficiently take into account Parliament's role in the area of freedom, security and justice.
Komisija bi morala predložiti nove predloge, ker je ocenjevanje med drugim zajemalo sistema SIS in VIS, zakonik o schengenskih mejah in vizumski zakonik, to pa so instrumenti, sprejeti s postopkom soodločanja.
As the evaluation covered the SIS, the VIS, the Schengen Borders Code and the Visa Code, among others, instruments which were adopted under co-decision, the Commission should submit new proposals.
Za nove predloge bi bilo treba uporabiti postopek soodločanja, ocenjevalni mehanizem pa bi se lahko vzpostavil s spremembo določenih instrumentov.
The new proposals should come under the co-decision procedure and may establish the evaluation mechanism through amending the specific instruments.
Z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe je zapadel predlog, utemeljen na tretjem stebru.
With the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the third-pillar proposal lapsed.
Drugi predlog (KOM(2009)102) je ostal v postopku.
However, the other proposal COM(2009)102 remained pending.
Komisija ga še ni umaknila.
The Commission has not withdrawn it yet.
V svojem „omnibus“ sporočilu z dne 2. decembra 2009 je navedla člen 74 PDEU kot novo pravno podlago v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo
In its "omnibus" communication of 2 December 2009 the Commission suggested Article 74 TFEU as the new legal basis under the Treaty of Lisbon
Parlament je 25. novembra 2009 v svoji resoluciji o stockholmskemu programu potrdil svoje stališče, da je treba schengenski ocenjevalni mehanizem revidirati tako, da se ustrezno upošteva vloga Parlamenta pri območju svobode, varnosti in pravice v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo
On 25 November 2009, in its resolution on the Stockholm Programme, Parliament confirmed its position that there is a need to revise the Schengen evaluation mechanism in a way which would take into account Parliament's role in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice under the Treaty of Lisbon in an adequate manner
Odstavka 13 in 148. .
Paragraphs 13 and 148. .
Poročevalec opozarja, da mora imeti Parlament, še posebej pa člani odbora LIBE, dostop do evalvacijskih poročil in vseh ostalih pomembnih informacij o izvajanju vseh morebitnih priporočil, preden lahko poda svoje utemeljeno mnenje.
The Rapporteur recalls that the European Parliament and in particular the Members of the LIBE Committee must have access to the evaluation reports and all the other relevant information concerning the implementation of any possible recommendations made, before giving a reasoned and motivated opinion.
Pričakuje, da bo Svet – ne le pri sedanjem ocenjevanju varstva podatkov, temveč tudi pri drugih ocenjevanjih na preostalih področjih – lahko zagotovil Evropskemu parlamentu vse zahtevane in razpoložljive informacije, da bo ta lahko sprejel pravo odločitev in izvajal potreben demokratični nadzor.
He expects that the Council, not only for the present evaluation on data protection, but also for the other evaluations that will take place on the remaining domains, should be able to ensure that the European Parliament is provided with all the information required and available in order to be able to provide a proper decision and to exercise the necessary democratic scrutiny.