natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
* Dve leti po začetku veljavnosti te direktive.
*Two years after the entry into force of this Directive.
Člen 35 ‑odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 35 ‑paragraph 1 ‑ subparagraph 1
Komisija lahko oblikuje smernice za razlago opredelitev pojmov predelave in odstranjevanja iz točk (14) in (18) člena 3 .
The Commission may develop guidelines for the interpretation of the definitions of recovery and disposal in points (14) and (18) of Article 3 .
Komisija lahko oblikuje smernice za razlago opredelitev pojmov predelave in odstranjevanja.
The Commission may develop guidelines for the interpretation of the definitions of recovery and disposal.
V skladu s členom 20(4) je „pogoj katerega koli dovoljenja, ki zajema sežig ali sosežig z energetsko predelavo, (...) da mora energetska predelava potekati ob visoki stopnji energetske učinkovitosti“.
In accordance with article 20.4, “ it shall be a condition of any permit covering incineration or coincineration with energy recovery that the recovery of energy is to take place with a high level of energy efficiency.”
V ta namen mora biti enačba energetske učinkovitosti objavljena kot tehnična smernica, ki se uporablja za VSE sežigalnice, ne glede na to, ali so klasificirane kot predelava ali odstranjevanje.
To this end, an energy efficiency formula should be published as technical guidance to be applied to ALL incineration facilities, irrelevant as to whether they are classed as recovery or disposal.
Priloga I – točka D 7
Annex I – point D 7
D 7 izpuščanje v morja/oceane, vključno z odlaganjem na morsko dno;
D 7 Release to seas/oceans including sea-bed insertion
Predlog spremembe s prve obravnave EP.
EP Amendment at first Reading.
Evropski parlament je v prvem branju sprejel nekaj pomembnih predlogov sprememb k osnutku direktive.
At its first reading, the European Parliament adopted some important amendments to the draft directive.
V drugem branju bo vztrajal, da se ohranijo.
It will now insist on their survival in the second reading.
Ključni predloga sprememb te vrste sta bila uvedba ciljev za recikliranje in preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov ter vztrajanje pri petstopenjski hierarhiji odpadkov kot splošnem pravilu.
Key amendments in this category were the introduction of targets for recycling and waste prevention, and the insistence on a five-stage waste hierarchy as a general rule.
Svet je sicer črtal vsa sklicevanja na cilje, poročevalka pa je po posvetovanju s Komisijo obnovila predloge sprememb Parlamenta.
The Council has erased all reference to targets but the rapporteur has restored the Parliament’s amendments in a modified form, having consulted the Commission.
Namen spremembe je, da bi bila besedila sprejemljivejša za Svet, pri ciljih preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov in recikliranja industrijskih odpadkov pa da bi se upoštevale potrebe po nadaljevanju na trdni statistični osnovi.
The changes are designed to make the texts more acceptable to the Council, and, in the case of the waste prevention target and industrial waste recycling target, to take account of the need to proceed on a sound statistical base.
Poročevalka in odbor menita, da bi bilo napak, če bi zapravili to priložnost, s katero bi lahko zagotovili, da bi bila ta direktiva kaj več kot zgolj skupek opredelitev.
In the view of the rapporteur and of the Committee, it would be wrong to miss this opportunity to ensure that this directive does more than supply a set of definitions.
Pomembno je, da med to direktivo in prizadevanji za recikliranje in preprečevanje iz tematske strategije o odpadkih obstaja resnična povezava.
It is important that there is a real link between it and the aspirations about recycling and prevention set out in the Thematic Strategy on Waste.
Brez ciljev namreč ta povezava dejansko ne obstaja.
Without the targets no such link really exists.
Brez dvoma bo zopet prišlo do nesoglasja med Parlamentom in Svetom glede obsega uporabe petstopenjske hierarhije odpadkov in poti, po katerih je možno od nje odstopati.
There will no doubt be another dispute between the Parliament and the Council on the extent to which the 5 stage waste hierarchy applies and how departures from it may take place.
Parlament zahteva, da se hierarhija uporablja kot splošno pravilo, Svet pa je bolj naklonjen izrazu „vodilno načelo“.
The Parliament wants the hierarchy to apply as a “general rule” and the Council prefers the words “guiding principle”.
Parlament ni povsem prepričan, da bo v spopadih na lokalni ravni vedno mogoče opaziti drobne razlike med obema izrazoma.
The rapporteur is not wholly convinced that in the dust of battle at local level the fine distinctions between the two phrases will always be perceived.
Ključni vidik pri tem vprašanju je, da mora biti v direktivi jasno določeno, da odstopanja od hierarhije ne smejo biti poljubna, ampak morajo potekati kot del urejenega postopka.
The key aspect of the issue is that the directive must make clear that departures from the hierarchy cannot take place casually but must be done as part of an ordered process.
Eden izmed pomembnih ciljev direktive je jasna razločitev med „predelavo“ in „odstranjevanjem“ odpadkov, saj sodbe Sodišča Evropskih Skupnosti v zvezi s tem vprašanjem vzbujajo dvome.
One important aim of the directive is to draw a clear distinction between what is considered “recovery” and what is “disposal” of waste, since Court of Justice judgements put the question in doubt.
Predlogi sprememb, sprejeti v prvem branju, so vključevali opredelitev „predelave“, ki bi pojem razširila na obrate za pridobivanje energije iz odpadkov, ki izpolnjujejo nekatera merila energetske učinkovitosti: predlogi sprememb iz prvega branja, ki niso bili naklonjeni konceptu pridobivanja energije iz odpadkov, niso bili sprejeti.
The amendments adopted at first reading included a definition of “recovery” that would extend the designation to energy from waste plants fulfilling certain energy efficiency criteria: first reading amendments hostile to the concept of securing energy from waste were not adopted.
Poročevalka meni, da lahko obrati za pridobivanje energije iz odpadkov pomembno vplivajo na ravnanje z ostanki odpadkov, ki bi sicer šli na odlagališča.
The rapporteur believes that energy from waste plants can play an important part in dealing with residual waste, which might otherwise go to landfill.
V času, ko se EU sooča z energetsko krizo in je čedalje bolj odvisna od nezanesljivih zunanjih virov goriva, vidi v odpadkih tudi potencialno pomembno gorivo.
She also sees waste as a potentially important fuel at a time when the EU is facing an energy crisis and is increasingly dependent on insecure foreign sources of fuel.
Naši odpadki nastanejo na domačem terenu.
Our waste is at least home-grown.
Iz njih lahko pridobimo toploto in energijo.
Heat and power can be recovered from it.
Izkušnje številnih držav članic kažejo, da energija iz odpadkov ne izriva recikliranja, ampak ga lahko dopolnjuje.
The experience of a number of member states shows that energy from waste can complement recycling and not drive it out.
Vsekakor bi bilo zaželeno uporabiti formulo energetske učinkovitosti, po kateri se morajo ravnati obrati za „predelavo“.
It would surely be a desirable development to apply an energy efficiency formula which “recovery” plants must comply with.
Takšna formula bi bila predvsem ključna pobuda za to, da bi graditelji novih obratov dali prednost energetski učinkovitosti.
Above all such a formula would be a crucial incentive to those building new plants to give priority to energy efficiency.
Poročevalki je seveda jasno, da nekateri evropski poslanci, ki že v osnovi nasprotujejo zamisli o obratih za pridobivanje energije iz odpadkov, zanje ne bodo nikoli glasovali v nobeni obliki.
But it is clear to the rapporteur that there are some MEP colleagues who are opposed fundamentally to the idea of energy from waste plants and who will never vote for them in any shape or form.
Spet drugi evropski poslanci, predvsem iz držav, ki so še v začetnih fazah preusmerjanja svojih odpadkov stran od odlagališč, se bojijo, da bi lahko pridobivanje energije iz odpadkov postal prevladujoč postopek ravnanja z odpadki in da bi tako omajal naložbe v recikliranje, ponovno uporabo in preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov.
There are other MEPs, mainly from countries still in the early stages of diverting their waste from landfill, who fear that energy from waste could become the predominant waste management process in their countries, and that it would then discourage investment in recycling, re-use and prevention.
Prav na tej točki je vztrajanje Parlamenta pri sprejetju ciljev recikliranja in preprečevanja tako zelo pomembno.
This is where the Parliament’s insistence on the adoption of recycling and prevention targets is so important.
Države članice želijo, da evropski poslanci potrdijo, da je pridobivanje energije iz odpadkov mogoče šteti za „predelavo“.
The member states want MEPs to recognise that energy from waste can qualify as “recovery”.
Da bi do tega prišlo, pa morajo priti do spoznanja, da bodo evropski poslanci to podprli, ČE bodo imeli zagotovilo, da bosta cilja recikliranja in preprečevanja vključena v direktivo.
To win this argument, they need to understand that MEPs will only vote to accept this IF they have the assurance that recycling and prevention targets will be included in the directive.
Takšna cilja sta zagotovilo, da pridobivanje energije iz odpadkov ne bo postalo glavni način ravnanja z odpadki.
Such targets are an insurance policy against energy from waste becoming the dominant means of waste management.
Parlament je v prvi obravnavi sprejel izboljšave predlogov Komisije za pretvorbo odpadkov, s katerimi se je pravilno ravnalo, v recikliran proizvod.
At its first reading the Parliament adopted improvements to the Commission’s proposals for turning properly treated waste into a recycled product.
Evropski poslanci so se ukvarjali s tem, da bi v okviru naslova „prenehanje statusa odpadka“ bolj jasno opozorili na potrebo po zakonodajnih predlogih, in sicer po specifikacijah za kompost, agregate, papir, steklo, kovino, izrabljene pnevmatike in odpadni tekstil.
MEPs were concerned to point the way more clearly towards the need for legislative proposals, under the “end of waste” heading, for specifications for compost, aggregates, paper, glass, metal, end of life tyres and waste textiles.
Pojasnilo glede pravil, ki se uporabljajo, bi v vseh teh primerih znatno pripomoglo k premiku k recikliranju.
In all these cases, clarifying what rules apply would greatly help the move to recycling.
Sramotno je, da je Svet pri tem izgubil živce in vprašanje potisnil med uvodne izjave.
It is a shame that at this point the Council lost its nerve and pushed the issue into the recitals.
Poročevalka poziva k več nujnim konkretnim ukrepom, zato je zadevo ponovno prestavila v samo besedilo direktive.
The rapporteur wants more urgent concrete action and has brought the matter back into the text of the directive.
Pri vprašanju stranskih proizvodov je Svet pogumno vključil opredelitev v člen 4.
The Council has been bold on the issue of by-products and has included a definition in article 4.
Mnenja lobistov pri Parlamentu so glede tega vprašanja popolnoma deljena.
Those lobbying the Parliament are completely split on the issue.
Poročevalka meni, da te priložnosti ne bi smeli odložiti na nedoločen datum, ampak bi jo bilo treba izkoristiti za dogovor o opredelitvi.
The rapporteur believes that this chance to settle on a definition should be seized and not postponed to an unknown date.
Direktiva prevzema dve obstoječi direktivi o nevarnih odpadkih in odpadnih oljih.
The directive takes over two existing directives- on hazardous waste and on waste oils.
Številni kolegi so bili zaskrbljeni, da je bilo v okvirno direktivo o odpadkih vključenih absolutno premalo vidikov obstoječe direktive o nevarnih odpadkov.
Many colleagues were uneasy that too many aspects of the existing hazardous waste directive were not being carried over into the waste framework directive.
Poročevalka je zato predlagala, da bi to popravili s ponovno vključitvijo predlogov sprememb iz prve obravnave.
The rapporteur has therefore proposed to reinstate some of the amendments proposed at first reading to remedy this.
Poročevalka pozdravlja besedilo Sveta o bioloških odpadkih in opozarja na manjše dodatke, ki bi jih bilo treba po njenem mnenju še narediti v zvezi z odgovornostjo proizvajalca.
The rapporteur welcomes the Council’s text on biowaste, and draws attention to the minor additions which, she feels, should still be made on the subject of producer responsibility
Poročevalka upa, da bo direktiva naposled dovolj jasna, da bo preprečila nadaljnje zatekanje k Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti.
The rapporteur hopes that the directive that finally emerges will be sufficiently clear to avoid further recourse to the European Court of Justice.
o celostni pomorski politiki za Evropsko unijo
on an integrated maritime policy for the European Union
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................12
MNENJE Odbora za ribištvo ........................................................................................14
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................16
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU ...................................................................17
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................19
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Celostna pomorska politika za Evropsko unijo“ ( KOM(2007)0575 , SEC(2007)1283 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union' ( COM(2007)0575 , SEC(2007)1283 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Sklepi posvetovanja o evropski pomorski politiki“ ( KOM(2007)0574 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Conclusions from the Consultation on a European Maritime Policy' ( COM(2007)0574 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije o skupni tristranski izjavi o ustanovitvi „Evropskega dne pomorstva“ ,
– having regard to the Commission proposal for a joint tripartite declaration establishing a 'European Maritime Day',
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z naslovom „Prihodnji pomorski politiki Unije naproti: evropska vizija za oceane in morja“ ( KOM(2006)0275 ) in resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. julija 2007
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper entitled 'Towards a future maritime policy for the Union: a European vision for the oceans and seas' ( COM(2006)0275 ) and the Parliament's resolution of 12 July 2007
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2007)0343 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0343 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva z zasedanja Evropskega sveta z dne 8. in 9. marca 2007 o sprejetju dokumenta „Akcijski načrt Evropskega sveta (2007–2009) – energetska politika za Evropo“,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the European Council of 8 - 9 March 2007 on the adoption by the European Council of a 'European Council Action Plan (2007-2009) – Energy Policy for Europe',
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „20 in 20 do leta 2020 – Priložnost Evrope glede podnebnih sprememb“ ( KOM(2008)0030 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication '20 20 by 2020 – Europe's climate change opportunity' ( COM(2008)0030 ),
– – ob upoštevanju določb iz Konvencije o pomorskih delovnih standardih iz leta 2006, ki jo je Mednarodna organizacija dela sprejela 23. februarja 2006, enotnega instrumenta, ki zajema in sprejema vse konvencije o pomorskem delu, ki jih je Mednarodna organizacija sprejela od leta 1919,
– having regard to the provisions laid down in the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, adopted by the International Labour Organization (ILO) on 23 February 2006, a single instrument encompassing and adapting the maritime labour conventions adopted by the ILO since 1919,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ter mnenj Odbora za regionalni razvoj, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0163/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinions of the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0163/2008 ),
A. ker so oceani in morja bistveni gospodarski in ekološki dejavniki Evropske unije; ker ima EU na obalnih območjih in v najbolj oddaljenih regijah 320 000 km dolgo obalo, na kateri živi tretjina prebivalcev Evrope,
A. whereas the oceans and seas are essential economic and environmental factors for the EU; whereas the EU, through its coastal and outermost regions, offers 320 000 km of coastline which is home to a third of Europe's population,
B. ker pomorska industrija in storitve ter pomorske regije prispevajo k evropskemu bruto domačemu proizvodu skupaj 40 %,
B. whereas marine-based industries and services, together with the coastal regions, contribute 40 % of EU GDP,
C. ker so podnebne spremembe največji izziv vseh politik 21. stoletja; ob upoštevanju ogroženosti obalnih regij zaradi dviga morske gladine, povezanega s podnebnimi spremembami, ki je lahko velikega obsega in ima drastične posledice za prebivalce,
C. whereas climate change is the greatest challenge of all policies in the 21st century; having regard to the threat posed to coastal regions by the climate-induced rise in sea levels, which may be on a massive scale, with drastic consequences for residents,
1. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija sprejela zgoraj navedena sporočila in akcijski načrt, predstavljen v zgoraj omenjenem delovnem dokumentu služb;
Welcomes the adoption by the Commission of the above-mentioned communications and the Action Plan presented in the above-mentioned staff working document;
5. spodbuja države članice, naj krepijo sodelovanje med sabo in sosednjimi državami za primerno uporabo programa TEN-T in drugih evropskih finančnih mehanizmov (kot je Marco Polo) za uresničitev projektov pomorskih avtocest/omrežij pomorskega prometa na kratkih razdaljah;
Encourages Member States to strengthen cooperation among themselves and with neighbouring countries for the appropriate use of TEN-T and other European financing mechanisms (such as Marco Polo) in order to accomplish the Motorways of the Sea and Short Sea Shipping Networks projects;
8. meni, da so pomorski grozdi v posebno dobrem položaju, da prispevajo k doseganju celostne pomorske politike; poziva Komisijo, naj takoj prične s projektom evropskega omrežja pomorskih grozdov;
Takes the view that maritime clusters are particularly well placed to make a contribution to achieving an integrated maritime policy; calls on the Commission to make a prompt start with the project for a European network of maritime clusters;
10. vendar na splošno meni, da akcijski načrt vsebuje premalo konkretnih ukrepov, in spodbuja Komisijo, da v prihodnosti ambiciozneje uporablja instrumente, h katerim je zavezana v skladu s pogodbami;
Takes the overall view, however, that the Action Plan includes too few practical measures and encourages the Commission to be more ambitious in future in using the instruments at its disposal under the Treaties;
13. vztraja, da dobro upravljanje morij zahteva dobro upravljanje obalnih območij ter da je treba pri gradbenih projektih na obalah EU v vsakem primeru upoštevati posledice podnebnih sprememb in posledičnega dviga morske gladine, erozije peska ter pogostejših in močnejših neviht;
Maintains that sound management of the seas requires sound management of coastal areas and that construction projects on EU coasts must therefore allow in every case for the consequences of climate change and the resulting rise in the sea level, the erosion of sands, and the increase in the frequency and violence of storms;
15. izrecno poziva Komisijo k večji ambicioznosti pri boju proti emisijam žvepla in dušikovega oksida ter emisijam trdnih delcev iz ladij; v zvezi s tem ponovno poudarja potrebo po tesnejšem sodelovanju z Mednarodno pomorsko organizacijo (IMO) in zlasti svoje zahteve za:
Calls emphatically on the Commission to be more ambitious in combating sulphur and nitrogen oxide emissions, as well as solid waste from ships; in this connection, reiterates the need for closer cooperation with the IMO (International Maritime Organization) and, in particular, its calls for:
· določitev emisijskih standardov dušikov oksid za ladje, ki pristajajo v pristaniščih EU;
· the introduction of nitrogen oxide emission standards for ships using EU ports;
· določitev Sredozemskega morja, Črnega morja in Severnega Atlantskega oceana za območji nadzora nad emisijami žvepla v skladu s konvencijo MARPOL;
· the designation of the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea and the North-East Atlantic as Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs) under the MARPOL Convention;
· znižanje najvišje dovoljene vsebnosti žvepla v ladijskem gorivu z 1,5 % na 0,5 % za potniške ladje, ki plujejo na območju nadzora nad emisijami žvepla;
· the reduction of the maximum permitted sulphur content in marine fuels used in SECAs by passenger vessels from 1,5 % to 0,5 %;
· uvedbo finančnih instrumentov, kot so davki in takse za emisije žveplovega dioksida in dušikovega oksida iz ladij, ter določitev načinov uvedbe takšnih instrumentov in davkov za vse ladje, ne glede na zastavo, ki pristajajo v pristaniščih Skupnosti ali plujejo v vodah držav članic EU;
· the introduction of fiscal measures, such as taxes or charges on sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ships and the identification of ways of imposing such measures and charges on all ships, regardless of flag, putting into Community ports or sailing within the waters of EU Member States;
· uvedbo stopenjskih pristaniških in plovbnih taks za spodbujanje ladij z majhnimi emisijami žveplovega dioksida in dušikovega oksida;
· promotion of the introduction of differentiated harbour and waterway charges to favour ships with low sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions;
· postopno uvajanje zahteve, da ladje v pristaniščih uporabljajo električno energijo s kopnega;
· the gradual introduction of a requirement for ships at ports to use land-based electricity
· predlog direktive EU za kakovost ladijskega goriva;
· a proposal for an EU directive on the quality of marine fuels;
18. poziva Komisijo, naj državam članicam pomaga izvajati načrt za spremljanje in kartografiranje razbitih ladij in potopljenih arheoloških najdišč, ker so del zgodovinske in kulturne dediščine Skupnosti, ter naj zato spodbuja razumevanje in preučevanje takšnih najdišč ter pomaga preprečiti njihovo plenitev, s čimer bi omogočila, da so najdišča ustrezno ohranjena;
Urges the Commission to help Member States to launch a plan to survey and map wrecked ships and submerged archaeological sites – since these form part of the Community’s historic and cultural heritage – and hence to facilitate understanding and the study of such sites and help prevent the despoliation to which they are being subjected, thus enabling them to be properly preserved;