natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ii) pri raziskavah in razvoju, usmerjenih v proizvode in postopke.
ii) in product and process orientated research and development.
Podatki o raziskavah in razvoju morajo biti zaupni.
Information on R&D should remain confidential.
Člen 58 – odstavek 2 – točka (e)
Article 58 – paragraph 2 – point e
e) navodila za uporabo in razmerje odmerka, izraženo v merskih enotah , za vsako uporabo, določeno v skladu s pogoji iz dovoljenja;
e) directions for use and the dose rate, expressed in metric units , for each use provided for under the terms of the authorisation;
e) navodila za uporabo in razmerje odmerka, izraženo na smiseln in uporabniku razumljiv način , za vsako uporabo, določeno v skladu s pogoji iz dovoljenja;
e) directions for use and the dose rate, expressed in a manner that is meaningful and comprehensible to users , for each use provided for under the terms of the authorisation;
Razmerje odmerka, izraženo v metričnih merskih enotah, ni razumljivo za nestrokovnjake in je zato uporabnikom težko razumljivo.
The dose rate expressed in metric units is not comprehensible for non-professional users and is therefore difficult for users to understand.
Zato bi moralo biti razmerje odmerka na označbi izražen na smiseln in končnemu uporabniku primeren način.
Instead, the dose rate should be expressed on the label in a manner that is meaningful and comprehensible to the end user.
Države članice zahtevajo, da se biocidni pripravki, dani v promet na njihovem ozemlju, označijo v njihovem uradnem jeziku ali jezikih.
Member States shall require that biocidal products placed on the market of their territories are labelled in their national language or languages.
Vsi pripravki morajo biti označeni v nacionalnem jeziku oziroma jezikih države članice, v kateri bodo dani na trg.
Products in general should always be labelled in the national language or languages of the Member State on whose market the product is placed.
(Pripravljavec mnenja je svoj predlog spremembe 39 spremenil upoštevaje države članice, ki imajo več nacionalnih jezikov.)
(The rapporteur has amended his proposed Amendment 39 of his draft opinion to take account of Member States with more than one national language.)
Biocidni pripravki, ki vsebujejo nanomateriale ali so bili izdelani na podlagi nanotehnologije, so kot taki jasno označeni.
Biocidal products which include nanomaterials or which have been manufactured by means of the nanotechnology shall be clearly labelled as such.
Člen 66 – odstavek 2 – točka (d)
Article 66 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) svetovanje in pomoč predlagateljem za vključitev aktivne snovi v Prilogo I ali za dovoljenje Skupnosti;
(d) providing advice and assistance to applicants for the inclusion of an active substance in Annex I or for a Community authorisation;
(d) svetovanje in pomoč predlagateljem , ter predvsem MSP, za vključitev aktivne snovi v Prilogo I ali za dovoljenje Skupnosti;
(d) providing advice and assistance to applicants , and in particular to SMEs , for the inclusion of an active substance in Annex I or for a Community authorisation;
Omeniti je treba, da bo bodo mala in srednje velika podjetja pri vlogah pogosteje potrebovala pomoč, ki jo morajo Komisija, agencija ali države članice zagotoviti, kadar koli je to mogoče.
It should be noted that SMEs will more often be in a position to require assistance with their applications and this should be provided whenever possible by Commission, Agency and Member States.
(a) znižana pristojbina se določi za mala in srednje velika podjetja v smislu Priporočila 2003/361/ES o opredelitvi mikro, malih in srednje velikih podjetij ;
(a) a reduced fee shall be set for small and medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises ;
(a) za mala in srednje velika podjetja se določi znižana pristojbina , s čimer se ne spremeni odgovornost ocenjevalnega pristojnega organa, da izvaja skrbno oceno skladno z uredbo ;
(a) a reduced fee shall be set for SMEs, this in no way alters the responsibility of the evaluating competent authority for carrying out an accurate evaluation within the meaning of the Regulation ;
Mala in srednje velika so posebej opredeljena v novem predlogu spremembe k členu 3, ki vsebuje opredelitve.
Definition for SMEs has been separately set in a new amendment to Article 3 on definitions.
Člen 70 – odstavek 2 – točka (d)
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) letno pristojbino plačajo tisti, ki dajo biocidne pripravke v promet , razen malih in srednje velikih podjetij ; ter
(d) an annual fee shall be paid by persons placing biocidal products on the market with the exception of SMEs ; and
Letna pristojbina bo pripomogla k trajnemu financiranju Evropske agencije za kemikalije, vendar bi morala biti mala in srednje velika podjetja oproščena plačila te pristojbine, da jih ne bi po nepotrebnem finančno obremenjevali.
While the annual fee will help sustain the continuous financing of ECHA, SMEs should be exempt from that in order not to place unnecessary financial burden on them.
Nacionalne službe za pomoč uporabnikom v državah članicah
N ational helpdesks in Member States
Države članice vzpostavijo nacionalne službe za pomoč uporabnikom, ki kot dopolnilo pomoči agencije iz člena 66(2)(d) predlagateljem, predvsem malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, in vsem drugim zainteresiranim stranem svetujejo o njihovih odgovornostih in obveznostih iz te uredbe.
Member States shall establish national helpdesks to provide advice to applicants, in particular to SMEs, and any other interested parties on their respective responsibilities and obligations under this Regulation and in addition to any assistance provided by the Agency under Article 66(2)(d).
Člen 77 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 3
Article 77 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Biocidni pripravki, za katere vloga za dovoljenje za pripravek ni bila vložena v skladu z drugim pododstavkom, se ne dajejo več v promet, in sicer šest mesecev od datuma, ko začne veljati vključitev.
Biocidal products, for which an application for a product authorisation has not been submitted in accordance with the second subparagraph, shall no longer be placed on the market with effect from six months after the date on which the inclusion becomes effective.
Biocidni pripravki, za katere vloga za dovoljenje za pripravek ni bila vložena v skladu z drugim pododstavkom, se ne dajejo več v promet, in od datuma, ko začne veljati vključitev.
Biocidal products, for which an application for a product authorisation has not been submitted in accordance with the second subparagraph, shall no longer be placed on the market with effect from the date on which the inclusion becomes effective.
Namen predloga spremembe je določiti krajše roke, saj morajo uporabniki biocidnih pripravkov niže v verigi poznati svoje obveznosti in stanje pregleda aktivne snovi.
The aim is to shorten the deadlines since downstream users should be aware of their obligations and of the state of revision of active substances.
Vloge za izdajo dovoljenja za biocidne pripravke, ki so snovi v stiku z živili in ki so bili na voljo v prometu [UL: vstavite datum iz prvega pododstavka člena 85], se vložijo najpozneje 1. januarja 2017.
Applications for the authorisation of biocidal products which are food contact materials and which were available on the market on [OJ: insert the date referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 85] shall be submitted at the latest 1 January 2017.
Člen 83 – odstavek 1 (novo)
Article 83 – paragraph -1 (new)
Dovoljenje za proizvodnjo in trženje aktivnih snovi, določenih za uporabo v biocidnih pripravkih, bi morala imeti le podjetja, ki prispevajo v sistem.
Only companies which contribute to the system should be authorised to manufacture and market active substances for use in biocidal products.
Najboljši način obvladovanja težav zaradi koristoljubnih teženj je ustrezen nadzor trga z aktivnimi snovmi.
This is the best way to deal with the problem of free riders, through appropriate supervision of the market in active substances.
Države članice bi morale obvezno določiti, kateri biocidni pripravki so navzoči na njihovem trgu oziroma ali so proizvajalci aktivnih snovi vložili dokumentacijo za vključitev v Prilogo I ter izvedli ustrezne postopke.
Member States should be required to establish what biocidal products exist on the market and whether the manufacturer of the active substance has submitted a file under Annex I, and take appropriate action.
Člen 83 – odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 83 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Pristojni organi sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe v skladu s členom 54(2).
Competent authorities shall take the necessary measures in accordance with Article 54(2).
Ustrezen nadzor trga z aktivnimi snovmi je najboljši način obvladovanja težav s koristoljubnimi težnjami.
The is the best way to deal with the problem of free riders, through appropriate supervision of the market in active substances.
Priloga III – prvi del (Zahteve glede podatkov za biocidne pripravke) – točka 1 a (novo)
Annex III - first part (Data requirements for biocidal products) - point 1 a (new)
Podatki se, kolikor je mogoče, pridobijo iz obstoječih podatkov, da se zmanjša število preskusov na živalih.
The information shall, as far as possible, be taken from existing data in order to minimise animal tests.
Izvajajo se zlasti določbe Direktive št. 1999/45/ES ali Uredbe (ES) št. 1272/2008.
The provisions of Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 shall, in particular, be applied.
Da se prepreči nepotrebno preskušanje na živalih.
To avoid unnecessary animal tests.
Priloga III – naslov 1 – točka 2.2
Annex III – Title 1 – point 2.2
Podrobni količinski in kakovostni podatki o sestavi biocidnega pripravka, na primer aktivna(-e) snov(-i), nečistote, dodatki , neaktivne sestavine, ob upoštevanju najvišje dovoljene koncentracije iz člena 16
Detailed quantitative and qualitative information on the composition of the biocidal product, e.g. active substance(s), impurities, adjutants, inert components , taking into account the concentration limits laid down in Article 16
Za uskladitev s predlogi spremembe k členu 16(2a) in (2b) (novo).
To bring the provision into line with the amendments to Article 16(2a) and (2b)(new).
Priloga V – glavna skupina 4 – 20. vrsta pripravkov
Annex V – Main Group 4 – Product type 20
20. vrsta pripravkov: -
Product-type 20: -
20. vrsta pripravkov: dezinfekcijska sredstva za hrano in krmo
Product-type 20: Food and feed disinfectants
Pripravki, ki se uporabljajo za dezinfekcijo hrane ali krme z nadzorom škodljivih organizmov.
Products used for the disinfection of food or feedstocks by the control of harmful organisms.
Vrsto biocidnega pripravka 20 (sredstva za konzerviranje hrane ali krme) je treba ohraniti, vendar je treba spremeniti njeno opredelitev, saj ti pripravki niso konzervansi, temveč dezinfekcijska sredstva.
It is necessary to keep biocidal product type 20 (‘Preservatives for food or feedstocks’) but its definition needs to be amended since these products are not preservatives but disinfectants.
Sredstva za razkuževanje hrane, okužene s človeškimi patogeni, kakršen je salmonela, na primer ne izpolnjujejo zahtev iz predpisov o krmnih dodatkih.
For example, products used to disinfect feed from human pathogens such as Salmonella do not meet the requirements of the feed additives regulations.
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Milan Cabrnoch, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Esther de Lange, Anne Delvaux, Edite Estrela, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Julie Girling, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Gilles Pargneaux, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Oreste Rossi, Richard Seeber, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Bogusław Sonik, Catherine Soullie, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Milan Cabrnoch, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Esther de Lange, Anne Delvaux, Edite Estrela, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Julie Girling, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Gilles Pargneaux, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Oreste Rossi, Richard Seeber, Theodoros Skylakakis, Bogusław Sonik, Catherine Soullie, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 2//2010 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010
on Council´s position on Draft amending budget No 2/2010 of the European Union for the financial year 2010
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 2/2010 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, oddelek I – Evropski parlament
on Council´s position on Draft amending budget No 2/2010 of the European Union for the financial year 2010
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 314 te pogodbe, v povezavi s Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo, zlasti člena 106a te pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular Article 314 thereof and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, ki je bil dokončno sprejet dne 17. decembra 2009
– having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010, as finally adopted on 17 December 2009
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe proračuna št. 2/2010 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, ki ga je Komisija predstavila 19. marca 2010 ( KOM(2010)0108 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 2/2010 of the European Union for the financial year 2010, which the Commission presented on 19 March 2010 (COM (2010)0108),
– ob upoštevanju pisma komisarja Janusza Lewandowskega predsedniku Buzeku z dne 9. julija 2010,
– having regard to the letter of Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski to President Buzek of 9 July 2010,
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 2/2010, ki ga je Svet določil 26. julija 2010 (12583/2010 – C7-0194/2010 ),
– having regard to Council's position on Draft amending budget No 2/2010, which the Council established on 26 July 2010 (12583/2010 – C7‑0194/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 75 in priloge V svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 75b and 75e of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun (A7‑0000/2010),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7‑0240/2010 ),
A. ker stališče Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 2/2010 krije kadrovski načrt urada BEREC (Organ evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije),
A. whereas the Council's position on Draft amending budget No 2/2010 covers the establishment plan of the BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) Office,
B. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 2/2010, da se prilagoditev proračuna uradno vključi v proračun za leto 2010,
B. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 2/2010 is to formally enter this budgetary adjustment into the 2010 budget,
C. ker je Svet sprejel svoje stališče 26. julija 2010,
C. whereas the Council adopted its position on 26 July 2010,
2. odobri nespremenjeno stališče Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 2/2010 in naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj izjavi, da je bila sprememba proračuna št. x/2010 dokončno sprejeta ter poskrbi za njeno objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
Approves Council's position on Draft amending budget No 2/2010 unamended and instructs its President to declare that Amending budget No x/2010 has been definitively adopted and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union ;
Na tristranskih pogovorih 30. junija je postalo jasno, da Svet ne želi sprejeti stališča o glavnem delu te spremembe proračuna, tj. o posledicah začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za Evropski ekonomski in socialni odbor ter Odbor regij.
During the Trilogue of 30 June it became clear that the Council did not wish to reach a position on the major part of this amending budget, i.e. the consequences of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty for the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) and the Committee of the Regions (CoR).
Za ukrepe, ki sta jih predlagala omenjena odbora, naj bi namenili skupaj 10,5 milijona EUR (4,1 milijona EUR za EESO in 6,4 milijona EUR za Odbor regij).
The measures proposed by the two committees total EUR 10, 5 million (EUR 4,1 million for the EESC and EUR 6,4 million for the CoR).
Število zaposlenih naj bi se povečalo za 59 (za 22 v EESO ter za 37 v Odboru regij).
There would be an increase in staff of 59 posts (22 for the EESC and 37 for the CoR).
Na tristranskih pogovorih je delegacija EP Svet pozvala, naj čim prej sprejme stališče glede tega.
During the Trilogue, the EP delegation urged the Council to reach a position as soon as possible.
Po drugi strani sta se delegaciji Sveta in EP strinjali, da se spremembe v zvezi z uradom BEREC (Organ evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije), ki ne bodo imele finančnih posledic, sprejme brez odlašanja.
On the other hand, both Council and EP delegations agreed that the change to the Establishment plan for BEREC (Office of the Body of the European Regulators for Electronic Communications), which has no financial impact, could go ahead without delay.
Dogovorili sta se, da se ta predlog obravnava ločeno od preostalih predlogov za spremembo proračuna.
They agreed on the proposal's being treated separately from the remaining draft amending budget.
V skladu s tem je Komisija v pismu komisarja Lewandowskega z dne 5. julija 2010 predlagala razdelitev predloga spremembe proračuna ( KOM(2010)0108 ) na dva dela.
Accordingly, by letter of Commissioner Lewandowski of 5 July 2010, the European Commission proposed splitting the draft amending Budget ( COM(2010)0108 ) into two parts.
To poročilo se zato nanaša samo na oddelek III proračuna.
The present report concerns therefore only Section III of the Budget.
Proračunski organ je za leto 2010 predvidel sredstva v višini 3,47 milijona EUR (2,57 milijona EUR za upravne in 0,9 milijona EUR za operativne odhodke), kar vključuje vse uslužbence po funkcijskih skupinah, vendar brez razčlenitve po razredih.
For 2010, the budgetary authority allocated an amount of EUR 3,47 million (EUR 2,57 million for administrative and EUR 0,9 million for operational expenditure), including the total number of staff by function groups but with no breakdown by grades.
Zato je treba spremeniti kadrovski načrt za leto 2010 in pri tem upoštevati podrobno razčlenitev po razredih.
It is therefore necessary to amend the 2010 establishment plan in order to include the detailed establishment plan by grades.
Za predlagano spremembo niso potrebni nobeni dodatni odhodki, ker so bile ustrezne upravne odobritve že odobrene v proračunu za leto 2010.
The proposed modification does not require any additional spending, as the corresponding administrative appropriations have already been authorised in the 2010 budget.
o izvajanju zakonodaje EU s področja ohranjanja biotske raznovrstnosti
on the implementation of EU legislation aiming at the conservation of biodiversity
MNENJE ODBORA ZA RIBIŠTVO ........................................................................................23
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................22
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PETICIJE ..........................................................................................27
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions ...............................................................26
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................31
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................30
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o zaustavitvi izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 in pozneje: Ohranjanje storitev ekosistemov za blaginjo ljudi ( KOM(2006)0216 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission on halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 – and beyond: sustaining ecosystem services for human well–being ( COM(2006)0216 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o srednjeročni oceni izvajanja akcijskega načrta ES za biotsko raznovrstnost ( KOM(2008)0864 konč.),
– having regard to the Commission communication on the mid-term assessment of implementing the EC biodiversity action plan ( COM(2008)0864 final),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o možnostih za vizijo in cilje EU glede biotske raznovrstnosti po letu 2010 ( KOM(2010)0004 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication on options for an EU vision and target for biodiversity beyond 2010 ( COM(2010)0004 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o stanju ohranjenosti habitatnih tipov in vrst, kot zahteva člen 17 direktive o habitatih ( KOM(2009)0358 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission on the conservation status of habitat types and species as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive ( COM(2009)0358 ),
132. o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst
132. on implementation of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora
UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.7.
OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.7.
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za okolje z dne 25. junija 2009 o srednjeročni oceni izvajanja akcijskega načrta ES za biotsko raznovrstnost in razvoju strategije EU za invazivne tuje vrste,
– having regard to the Environment Council conclusions of 25 June 2009 on the ‘Mid-term assessment of implementing the EU biodiversity action plan’ and ‘Towards an EU Strategy on invasive alien species’,
– ob upoštevanju neuradnega srečanja Sveta, ki je potekalo 26. in 27. januarja 2010 v Madridu, na katerem so bile sprejete tako imenovane prednostne naloge „Cibeles“, in sklepov Sveta za okolje z dne 15. marca 2010 o biotski raznovrstnosti po letu 2010 – vizija in cilji na ravni Evropske unije in na svetovni ravni ter mednarodna ureditev dostopa in porazdelitve bremena,
– having regard to the informal Council held on 26-27 January 2010 in Madrid, which adopted the so-called ‘Cibeles’ priorities, and the Environment Council conclusions of 15 March 2010 on biodiversity post-2010 – EU and global vision and targets and international access and burden sharing regime,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za okolje z dne 25. in 26. marca 2010, zlasti odstavka 14,
– having regard to the European Council conclusions of 25-26 March 2010, in particular paragraph 14,
– ob upoštevanju evropskega vrha v Gothenburgu leta 2001, na katerem je bilo sklenjeno, da bo kot del strategije za trajnostni razvoj do leta 2010 zaustavljeno izgubljanje biotske raznovrstnosti,
– having regard to the European Summit in Gothenburg in 2001, where it was agreed to halt the loss of biodiversity by 2010 as part of a Sustainable Development Strategy,
– ob upoštevanju študije o ekonomiki ekosistemov in biotski raznovrstnosti (TEEB) (http://www.teebweb.org),
– having regard to the study on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) (http://www.teebweb.org),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o razvoju strategije EU za invazivne vrste ( KOM(2008)0789 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication towards an EU strategy on invasive species ( COM(2008)0789 ),
– ob upoštevanju modre knjige EU o celostni pomorski politiki ( KOM(2007)0575 in SEC(2007)1278 ) ter tekočih priprav na reformo skupne ribiške politike,
– having regard to the EU’s Blue Paper on an Integrated Maritime policy ( COM(2007)0575 and SEC(2007)1278 ) and the ongoing preparations for the reform of the common fisheries policy,