natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(6f) Vsako prošnjo za izdajo evropske odredbe o zaščiti je treba obravnavati dovolj hitro, ob upoštevanju posebnih okoliščin zadeve, vključno z njeno nujnostjo, predvidenim datumom prihoda zaščitene osebe na ozemlje države izvršiteljice in če je možno, stopnjo ogroženosti zaščitene osebe.
(6f) Any request for the issuing of an EPO should be treated with adequate celerity taking into consideration the specific circumstances of the case, including the urgency of the matter, the date foreseen for the arrival of the protected person on the territory of the executing State and, where possible, the degree of risk for the protected person.
(6g) Kadar se v skladu s to direktivo informacijo posreduje povzročitelju nevarnosti ali zaščiteni osebi, bi bilo treba to informacijo posredovati tudi morebitnemu skrbniku ali zastopniku zadevne osebe.
(6g) Where information is to be provided under this Directive to the person causing danger or the protected person, this information should also be provided to the guardian or the representative of the person concerned if they exist.
Ustrezno pozornost bi bilo treba posvetiti tudi temu, da zaščitena oseba, povzročitelj nevarnosti ali njun zastopnik v postopku informacije prejmejo v jeziku, ki ga razumejo, kot določa ta direktiva.
Due attention should also be paid to the need for the protected person, the person causing danger or their representative in the proceedings, to receive information, as provided for by this Directive, in a language they understand.
(6h) Pristojne oblasti bi morale v postopku za izdajo in priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti ustrezno pozornost posvetiti potrebam žrtev, zlasti ranljivih oseb, na primer mladoletnikov in invalidnih oseb.
(6h) In the procedures for the issuing and recognition of a European Protection order, competent authorities should give appropriate consideration to the needs of victims, including particularly vulnerable persons, e.g. minors or persons with disabilities.
Ustrezno pozornost bi bilo treba posvetiti tudi temu, da zaščitena oseba ali povzročitelj nevarnosti prejmeta informacije v jeziku, ki ga razumeta, kot določa ta direktiva.
Due attention should also be paid to the need for the protected person or the person causing danger to receive information, as provided for by this Directive, in a language they understand.
(6i) Za uporabo te direktive je morda uveden zaščitni ukrep v skladu s sodbo, opredeljeno v členu 2 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/947/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in pogojnih odločb zaradi zagotavljanja nadzorstva nad spremljevalnimi ukrepi in alternativnimi sankcijami
(6i) For the application of this Directive, a protection measure may have been imposed following a judgment, as defined by Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions
UL L 337, 16.12.2008, str.
OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p .
102. , ali v skladu z odločbo o nadzornih ukrepih, opredeljeno v členu 4 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2009/829/PNZ z dne 23. oktobra 2009 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb o nadzornih ukrepih med državami članicami Evropske unije kot alternativi začasnemu priporu
102. , or following a decision on supervision measures as defined in Article 4 of Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention
UL L 294, 11.11.2009, str.
OJ L 294, 11.11.2009, p .
(6j) V skladu s členom 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter drugim odstavkom člena 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah bi bilo treba povzročitelju nevarnosti omogočiti, da je zaslišan in da izpodbija zaščitni ukrep, bodisi med postopkom, ki vodi k sprejetju zaščitnega ukrepa, bodisi pred izdajo evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
(6j) In conformity with Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and with Article 47, paragraph 2, of the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the person causing danger should be provided, either in the procedure leading to the adoption of a protection measure or before issuing a European protection order, with the possibility to be heard and to challenge the protection measure.
(7) Da bi se preprečilo, da bi bilo proti žrtvi v državi izvršiteljici storjeno kaznivo dejanje ali novo kaznivo dejanje, bi bilo treba tej državi ponuditi pravno podlago za priznanje odločbe, ki je bila predhodno sprejeta v korist žrtve v državi izdajateljici, hkrati pa tudi preprečiti, da bi morala žrtev v državi izvršiteljici sprožiti nov postopek ali predložiti dokaze, kot da država izdajateljica ni sprejela odločbe.
(7) In order to prevent a crime or new crime being committed against the victim in the executing State, that State should be given a legal basis for recognising the decision previously adopted in the issuing State in favour of the victim, while also avoiding the need for the victim to start new proceedings or to produce the evidence in the executing State again as if the issuing State had not adopted the decision.
Priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti s strani države izvršiteljice med drugim pomeni, da pristojni organ te države ob upoštevanju omejitev iz te direktive sprejema obstoj in veljavnost zaščitnega ukrepa, sprejetega v državi izdajateljici, prizna dejansko stanje, opisano v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, in soglaša, da je treba zagotoviti zaščito in jo tudi neprekinjeno zagotavljati v skladu z njegovo nacionalno zakonodajo.
The recognition of the European protection order by the executing State implies inter alia that the competent authority of that State, subject to the limitations set out in this Directive, accepts the existence and validity of the protection measure adopted in the issuing State, acknowledges the factual situation described in the European protection order, and agrees that protection should be provided and should be continued to be provided in accordance with its national law.
(8) Ta direktiva vsebuje zaključeno število obveznosti oziroma prepovedi, ki morajo, če so bile uvedene v državi izdajateljici in so vsebovane v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, biti priznane in se morajo izvajati v državi izvršiteljici ob upoštevanju omejitev iz te direktive.
(8) This Directive contains a closed number of obligations or prohibitions which, when imposed in the issuing State and contained in the European protection order, should be recognised and enforced in the executing State, subject to the limitations set out in this Directive.
Druge vrste zaščitnih ukrepov lahko obstajajo na nacionalni ravni, kot je, če to predpisuje nacionalna zakonodaja, dolžnost povzročitelja nevarnosti, da ostane v določenem kraju.
Other types of protection measures may exist at national level, such as, if provided by national law, the obligation for the person causing danger to remain in a specified place.
Takšne ukrepe lahko uvede država izdajateljica v okviru postopka, ki vodi v sprejetje enega od zaščitnih ukrepov, ki je lahko v skladu s to direktivo temelj evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
Such measures may be imposed in the issuing State in the framework of the procedure leading to the adoption of one of the protection measures which, according to this Directive, may be the basis for a European Protection Order.
(8a) Ker so v državah članicah za izdajo in izvajanje zaščitnih ukrepov pristojni različni organi (civilni, kazenski ali upravni), se zdi primerno v tej direktivi zagotoviti visoko stopnjo prožnosti v mehanizmu sodelovanja med državami članicami.
(8a) Since in the Member States different kind of authorities (civil, criminal or administrative) are competent to issue and enforce protection measures, it seems appropriate to provide a high degree of flexibility in the cooperation mechanism between the Member States under this Directive.
Pristojnemu organu države izvršiteljice zato ni treba v vseh primerih sprejeti enakega zaščitnega ukrepa, kot je sprejet v državi izdajateljici, in ima določeno stopnjo diskrecije, da sprejme kateri koli ukrep, za katerega meni, da je v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ustrezen v podobnem primeru in primeren za zagotavljanje neprekinjene zaščite zadevne osebe z vidika zaščitnega ukrepa, ki je sprejet v državi izdajateljici in kot je opisan v evropski odredbi o zaščiti.
Therefore, the competent authority in the executing State does not in all cases have to take the same protection measure as adopted in the issuing State, but it has a degree of discretion to adopt any measure which it finds adequate and appropriate under its national law in a similar case in order to provide continued protection to the protected person in the light of the protection measure adopted in the issuing State and as described in the European protection order.
(8b) Obveznosti oziroma prepovedi, na katere se ta direktiva nanaša, med drugim obsegajo ukrepe, katerih cilj je omejitev osebnih stikov ali stikov na daljavo med zaščiteno osebo in povzročiteljem nevarnosti, npr. z določitvijo nekaterih oblik takšnih stikov ali z uvedbo omejitev glede vsebine komunikacije.
(8b) The obligations or prohibitions to which this Directive applies include, among others, measures aimed at limiting personal or remote contacts between the protected person and the person causing danger, e.g. by imposing certain modalities of such contacts or imposing restrictions on the contents of communications.
(8c) Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice bi moral obvestiti povzročitelja nevarnosti, pristojni organ države izdajateljice in zaščiteno osebo o vsakem ukrepu, ki se sprejme na podlagi evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
(8c) The competent authority of the executing State should inform the person causing danger, the competent authority of the issuing State and the protected person of any measure taken on the basis of the European protection order.
V uradnem obvestilu povzročitelju nevarnosti bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati interes zaščitene osebe in ne razkriti njenega naslova ali drugih kontaktnih podatkov.
In the notification of the person causing danger due regard should be taken to the interest of the protected person of not having his/her address or other contact details disclosed.
Takšne podatke bi bilo treba izločiti iz uradnega obvestila, pod pogojem, da naslov ali drugi kontaktni podatki niso zajeti v obveznostih oziroma prepovedih, ki so kot izvršilni ukrep naložene povzročitelju nevarnosti.
Such details should be excluded from the notification, provided that the address or other contact detail is not comprised in the obligation or prohibition imposed as an enforcement measure on the person causing danger.
(8d) Ko pristojni organ države izdajateljice prekliče evropsko odredbo o zaščiti, bi moral pristojni organ države izvršiteljice ustaviti ukrepe, ki jih je sprejel za izvršitev evropske odredbe o zaščiti, pri čemer se razume, da lahko pristojni organ v državi izvršiteljici – samostojno, v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo – sprejme kakršen koli zaščitni ukrep v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo za zaščito zadevne osebe.
(8d) When the competent authority in the issuing State has withdrawn the European protection order, the competent authority in the executing State should end the measures which it has adopted in order to enforce the European protection order, it being understood that the competent authority in the executing State may - autonomously, according to its national law - adopt any protection measure under its national law in order to protect the person concerned.
(9) Ker so v tej direktivi obravnavani primeri, pri katerih je zaščitena oseba tista, ki se preseli v drugo državo članico, izvajanje njenih določb ne pomeni prenosa pooblastil na državo izvršiteljico v zvezi z glavno, odloženo, drugačno, pogojno ali sekundarno kaznijo ali varnostnim ukrepom, izrečenim zoper povzročitelja nevarnosti, če ta še naprej prebiva v državi, ki je izdala zaščitni ukrep.
(9) Given that this Directive deals with situations in which the protected person moves to another Member State, executing its provisions does not imply any transfer to the executing State of powers relating to principal, suspended, alternative, conditional or secondary penalties, or relating to security measures imposed on the person causing danger, if the latter continues to reside in the State that issued the protection measure.
(10) Po potrebi bi morali ukrepi, sprejeti pri izvajanju te direktive, v praksi biti uveljavljeni elektronsko, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in postopki.
(10) Where appropriate, it should be possible to use electronic means with a view to putting into practice the measures adopted in application of this Directive, in accordance with national laws and procedures.
(10a) V okviru sodelovanja med organi, vključenimi v zagotavljanje zaščite zadevne osebe, bi moral pristojni organ države izvršiteljice pristojnemu organu države izdajateljice sporočiti vsako kršitev ukrepov, sprejetih v državi izvršiteljici z namenom izvrševanja evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
(10a) In the framework of cooperation among the authorities involved in ensuring the safeguard of the protected person, the competent authority of the executing State should communicate to the competent authority of the issuing State any breach of the measures adopted in the executing State with a view to executing the European protection order.
To sporočilo bi moralo pristojnemu organu države izdajateljice omogočiti, da se nemudoma odloči za ustrezen odziv v zvezi z zaščitnim ukrepom, izrečenim zoper povzročitelja nevarnosti v njegovi državi.
This communication should enable the competent authority of the issuing State to promptly decide on any appropriate reaction with respect to the protection measure imposed in its State on the person causing danger.
Takšen odziv lahko po potrebi vključuje uvedbo ukrepa odvzema prostosti namesto prvotno sprejetega ukrepa brez odvzema prostosti, npr. kot alternativo preventivnemu priporu ali kot posledico pogojne odložitve kazni.
Such reaction may comprise, where appropriate, the imposition of a custodial measure in substitution of the non-custodial measure originally adopted, e.g. as alternative to preventive detention or as a consequence of conditional suspension of a penalty.
Razumljivo je, da takšna odločitev, ki ne pomeni nove uvedbe kazenske sankcije v zvezi z novim kaznivim dejanjem, ne posega v možnost države izvršiteljice, da v primeru kršitve ukrepov, sprejetih za izvrševanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti, kjer je primerno, naloži kazenske ali nekazenske sankcije.
It is understood that such decision, since it does not consist in the imposition ex novo of a criminal sanction in relation to a new criminal offence, does not interfere with the possibility that the executing State may, where applicable, impose criminal or non-criminal sanctions in case of breach of the measures adopted in order to execute the European protection order.
(10b) Glede na različne pravne tradicije držav članic bi moral pristojni organ države izvršiteljice, če v tej državi ni nobenega zaščitnega ukrepa za primer, podoben dejanskemu stanju, opredeljenemu v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, poročati pristojnemu organu države izdajateljice o vsaki kršitvi zaščitnega ukrepa, opredeljenega v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, s katero je seznanjen.
(10b) Considering the different legal traditions of the Member States, where no protection measure would be available in the executing State in a case similar to the factual situation described in the European protection order, the competent authority of the executing State should report any breach of the protection measure described in the European protection order of which it is aware to the competent authority of the issuing State.
(10c) Za nemoteno uporabo te direktive v vseh posameznih primerih bi morali pristojni organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice svoje pristojnosti izvajati v skladu z določbami te direktive in ob upoštevanju načela ne bis in idem.
(10c) In order to achieve the smooth application of this Directive in each particular case, the competent authorities of the issuing and the executing States should exercise their competencies in conformity with the provisions of this Directive, taking into account the principle of ne bis in idem.
(10d) Zaščitena oseba ne bi smela nositi stroškov za priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti, ki bi bili nesorazmerni v primerjavi s podobnim nacionalnim primerom.
(10d) The protected person should not be required to sustain costs for the recognition of the European protection order which are disproportionate with respect to a similar national case.
Države članice bi morale pri izvajanju te direktive zagotoviti, da zaščitena oseba, ki ji je bila priznana evropska odredba o zaščiti, ne bi bila dolžna začeti novih postopkov na nacionalni ravni, da bi kot neposredna posledica priznanja evropske odredbe o zaščiti od izvršilnega organa prejela odločbo o sprejetju ukrepov, ki so v skladu z njegovo nacionalno zakonodajo na voljo za podobne primere zaščite zaščitene osebe.
When implementing this Directive, Member States should ensure that, after recognition of the European protection order, the protected person should not be required to initiate further national proceedings to obtain from the executing authority, as a direct consequence of the recognition of the European protection order, the decision adopting any measure that would be available under its national law in a similar case in order to ensure the protection of the protected person.
(10e) Ob upoštevanju načela vzajemnega priznavanja, na katerem temelji ta direktiva, bi morale države članice v največji možni meri spodbujati neposredne stike med pristojnimi organi pri izvajanju tega instrumenta.
(10e) Bearing in mind the principle of mutual recognition on which this Directive is based, Member States should promote to the widest extent possible the direct contact between the competent authorities in the application of this instrument.
(10f) Brez poseganja v pravosodno neodvisnost in raznolikost sodnih sistemov po Uniji bi morale države članice razmisliti o tem, da ustanove, ki so pristojne za usposabljanje sodnikov, tožilcev, policijskih delavcev in delavcev v pravosodju, ki sodelujejo v postopkih za izdajo in priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti, zaprosijo za ustrezno usposabljanje v skladu s cilji te direktive.
(10f) Without prejudice to judicial independence and differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the Union, Member States should consider requesting those responsible for the training of judges, prosecutors, police and judicial staff involved in the procedures aiming at issuing or recognizing a European protection order to provide appropriate training with respect to the objectives of this Directive.
(10g) Države članice bi morale z namenom, da zagotovijo ocenjevanje uporabe te direktive, sporočiti Evropski komisiji ustrezne podatke o izvajanju nacionalnih postopkov po evropski odredbi o zaščiti in vsaj o številu zaprošenih, izdanih in/ali priznanih evropskih odredb o zaščiti.
(10g) In order to facilitate the evaluation of the application of this Directive, Member States should communicate to the European Commission relevant data related to the application of national procedures on the European protection order, at least on the number of European protection orders requested, issued and/or recognized.
Pri tem bi bile koristne tudi druge vrste podatkov, na primer o različnih vrstah kaznivih dejanj.
In this respect, other types of data, such as for example the types of crimes concerned, would also be useful.
(11) Ker države članice same zaradi čezmejne narave zadevnih primerov ne morejo v zadostni meri doseči cilja te direktive, torej zaščititi ogrožene osebe, in bi bil cilj zaradi obsega in morebitnega vpliva lažje dosežen na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
(11) Since the objective of this Directive, namely to protect persons who are in danger, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting unilaterally, given the cross‑border nature of the situations involved, and could instead, due to the scale and potential effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as referred to in Article 5(3) of the TEU.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz člena 5(4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ta direktiva ne presega okvira, potrebnega za doseganje navedenega cilja.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5(4) of the TEU, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.
(11a) Ta direktiva bi morala prispevati k zaščiti ogroženih oseb ter s tem dopolnjevati instrumente, ki so že vzpostavljeni na tem področju, kot sta Okvirni sklep Sveta 2008/947/PNZ in Okvirni sklep Sveta 2009/829/PNZ, pri tem pa ne vplivati nanje.
(11a) This Directive should contribute to the protection of persons who are in danger, thereby complementing but not affecting the instruments already in place in this field, such as Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA and Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA.
(11b) Kadar odločba v zvezi z zaščitnim ukrepom spada na področje uporabe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
(11b) When a decision relating to a protection measure falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p .
1. , Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo
1. , Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgements in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility
UL L 338, 23.12.2003, str.
OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p .
1 ali Haaške konvencije iz leta 1996 o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju, uveljavljanju in sodelovanju glede starševske odgovornosti in ukrepov za varstvo otrok
1 , or the 1996 Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Cooperation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children
1. bi bilo treba priznavanje in izvrševanje takšnih sodnih odločb izvajati v skladu z določbami zadevnega pravnega instrumenta.
1. , the recognition and enforcement of such decision should be carried out in accordance with the provisions of that legal instrument.
(11c) Države članice in Komisija bi morale, kjer je to ustrezno, informacije o evropski odredbi o zaščiti vključiti v potekajoče kampanje izobraževanja in ozaveščanja o zaščiti žrtev kaznivih dejanj.
(11c) Member States and the Commission should include information about the European protection order, where it is appropriate, in existing education and awareness-raising campaigns on the protection of victims of crime.
(11d) Osebni podatki, ki se obdelujejo pri izvajanju te direktive, bi morali biti varovani v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2008/977/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah
(11d) Personal data processed when implementing this Framework Decision should be protected in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters
UL L 350, 30.12.2008, str.
OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p .