natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3. poziva, naj vse institucije in organi EU prejmejo proračunska sredstva in kadre, ki jih potrebujejo, da bi lahko državljanom dali hitre in vsebinske odgovore na vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije;
Calls for all EU institutions and bodies to be given the necessary budgetary and human resources to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions;
7. meni, da vloga varuha človekovih pravic pri spodbujanju preglednosti in odgovornosti v postopku odločanja in upravljanja v Evropski uniji pomembno prispeva k oblikovanju Unije, v kateri se odločitve sprejemajo „v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani“, kot je opredeljeno v členu 1(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji;
Regards the role of the Ombudsman in enhancing openness and accountability in the decision-making processes and administration of the European Union as an essential contribution towards a Union in which decisions are taken 'as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen', as provided for in Article 1(2) of the Treaty on European Union;
10. pozdravlja revizijo statuta varuha človekovih pravic, zlasti večja pooblastila za preiskavo, s čimer bi pomagali zagotoviti, da bodo državljani popolnoma zaupali v njegovo zmožnost, da brez omejitev temeljito razišče njihove pritožbe;
Welcomes the revision of the Ombudsman's Statute, in particular the Ombudsman's strengthened powers of investigation which will help to ensure that citizens can have full confidence in his ability to conduct a thorough investigation of their complaints without restrictions;
12. meni, da je delež nedopustnih pritožb še vedno nezadovoljiv, čeprav ga je mogoče razumeti, in priporoča izvedbo stalne kampanje obveščanja evropskih državljanov, ki naj bo namenjena osveščanju o funkciji in pristojnostih članov evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic;
Considers that the figure in respect of inadmissible complaints remains unsatisfactory although understandable, and recommends in view of this that a continued information campaign be conducted amongst European citizens designed to raise their awareness of the functions and competence of the members of the European Network of Ombudsmen;
16. poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj še naprej spremlja dogajanje in zagotovi, da bo Komisija ustrezno uporabila svoje diskrecijske pravice za začetek postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev po členu 226 Pogodbe ES ali predlog denarne kazni po členu 228 Pogodbe ES, pri tem pa naj dosledno skrbi, da ne bo zamujala ali neupravičeno na hitro sprejemala ukrepov, kar ni v skladu z njenimi pooblastili za nadzor nad izvajanjem prava EU, ter zahteva, da v zvezi s tem še naprej sodeluje z odborom za peticije;
Calls on the Ombudsman to maintain a watching brief and ensure that the Commission makes proper use of its discretionary powers to initiate infringement proceedings under Article 226 of the EC Treaty or to propose penalties under Article 228 of the EC Treaty, while taking scrupulous care to avoid delays or unjustifiable failure to take prompt action, which are incompatible with the Commission's powers to oversee the application of EU law, and requests that he continues to liaise with the Committee on Petitions in this connection;
18. ugotavlja, da je varuh človekovih pravic predložil posebno poročilo, v katerem je kritično opozoril Komisijo, da ni ustrezno upravičila svojega obravnavanja zunanjih pomožnih konferenčnih tolmačev, starejših od 65 let, o čemer je Parlament 5. aprila 2009
Notes that the Ombudsman has presented a special report criticising the Commission for having failed adequately to justify its treatment of freelance auxiliary conference interpreters over 65 years of age, on which Parliament adopted a resolution on 5 April 2009
20. pozdravlja izredno sodelovanje med varuhom človekovih in odborom za peticije v institucionalnih okvirih v zvezi z medsebojnim spoštovanjem pristojnosti in posebnih pravic;
Welcomes the excellent relationship between the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions within the institutional frameworks as regards reciprocal respect of competences and prerogatives;
25. opaža, da ima vsaka institucija svoje spletno mesto, kjer je mogoče vložiti pritožbe, peticije itd., zaradi česar imajo lahko državljani preglavice z razlikovanjem različnih institucij; zato pozdravlja oblikovanje interaktivnega priročnika za pomoč državljanom pri prepoznavanju najustreznejše institucije za reševanje njihovih težav;
Notes that each institution has its own website enabling complaints, petitions, etc. to be lodged, and that this can frustrate citizens in distinguishing between the various institutions; supports, therefore, the development of an interactive manual designed to assist citizens in identifying the most suitable forum for resolving their problems;
Predsednik Evropskega parlamenta Hans-Gert Pöttering je 21. aprila 2009 uradno prejel letno poročilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2008, evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamandouros pa je svoje poročilo 14. septembra 2009 predstavil odboru za peticije.
The annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2008 was formally submitted to the President of the European Parliament, Hans-Gert Pöttering, on 21 April 2009 and the European Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros presented his report to the Committee on Petitions on 14 September 2009.
Poročilo je jasen in podroben povzetek dejavnosti evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v minulem letu.
The report provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the European Ombudsman's activities over the last year.
Različne ugotovitve preiskav so predstavljene na uporabniku prijazen način, s primeri in po kategorijah, kot so vrste domnevne nepravilnosti ali zadevne institucije.
The various inquiry findings are presented in a user-friendly way using examples and are broken down by categories such as nature of alleged maladministration or institution concerned.
Z novo predstavitvijo statističnih podatkov in novo razporeditvijo je poročilo postalo veliko razumljivejše od prejšnjih poročil.
The new presentation of the statistical data and the new layout has made the report far more comprehensible than the previous reports.
Pripravljen je bil tudi nov šest strani dolg pregled dela za leto 2008.
A new six-page Overview 2008 has also been produced.
V tej novi publikaciji so zabeleženi najpomembnejši rezultati v zvezi s pritožbami in izpostavljena najpomembnejša politična vprašanja, obravnavana v preteklem letu.
This new publication records the most important results obtained for complainants and highlights the main policy issues dealt with over the past year.
Pritožbe in preiskave
Complaints and inquiries
Večina teh preiskav se je nanašala na Evropsko komisijo (66 %).
Most of these inquiries concerned the European Commission (66%).
Pritožbe so se nanašale tudi upravo Evropskega parlamenta (10 %), Evropski urad za izbor osebja (7 %), Svet (3 %) in Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (2 %).
Complainants also targeted the administration of the European Parliament (10%), the European Personnel selection Office EPSO (7%), the Council (3%) and the European Anti-Fraud Office OLAF (2%).
V dodatnih 37 preiskavah (13 %) je bilo obravnavanih še 20 drugih institucij in organov EU.
Twenty other EU institutions and bodies were the subject of further 37 inquiries (13%).
Leta 2008 je bilo zaključeno rekordno število preiskav.
A record number of inquiries were closed in 2008.
Večina je bila zaključenih v manj kot enem letu (52 %), tretjina (36 %) pa v treh mesecih.
Most were closed within less than a year (52%) and one third (36%) within three months.
Od teh jih je bilo 352 povezanih s pritožbami, tri pa so bile opravljene na pobudo varuha človekovih pravic.
Of these 352 were linked to complaints and 3 were own-initiative inquiries.
V 110 primerih je preiskava pokazala, da ni bilo nepravilnosti, kar ni nujno negativen izid za pritožnika, saj mu je zadevna institucija ali organ poslal podrobno obrazložitev, to pa je lahko priložnost za opredelitev morebitnih izboljšav v zvezi s kakovostjo upravnih storitev, ki jih ta izvaja.
In 110 cases the inquiry revealed no maladministration, a finding which is not necessarily a negative outcome for the complainant, since he or she gets a full explanation from the institution or body concerned, and there may be an opportunity to identify a potential improvement in the quality of administration provided by an institution or body.
V letu 2008 so zadevne institucije ali organi v prid pritožnika rešili 129 primerov (36 %).
During 2008, 129 cases (36%) were settled to the satisfaction of the complainant by the institution or body concerned.
Te primere je rešila institucija ali pa je bila dosežena prijateljska rešitev.
These cases were either settled by the institution or a friendly solution was agreed.
To odraža vse večjo pripravljenost institucij in organov, da pritožbe varuhu vidijo kot priložnost za popravo storjenih napak in sodelujejo z njim v korist evropskih državljanov.
This reflects a growing willingness to regards complaints made to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to correct mistakes and to cooperate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of European citizens.
V svojem letnem poročilu je varuh človekovih pravic izpostavil osem zadev
In his Annual report the Ombudsman highlights 8 cases
Zadeve OI/5/2005/PB (EPSO), 754/2007/BU (OLAF), 2448/2008/WP (Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti), 3490/2005/(ID)PB (ES), 3784/2006/FOR (ES), 2672/2008/VL (ES), 1162/2997/FOR (Svet) in 893/2006/BU (EASA). , ki so nazorni primeri dobre prakse.
Cases OI/5/2005/PB (EPSO), 754/2007/BU (OLAF), 2448/2008/WP (ECJ), 3490/2005/(ID)PB (EC), 3784/2006/FOR (EC), 2672/2008/VL (EC), 1162/2997/FOR (Council) and 893/2006/BU (EASA). , which constitute illustrative examples of best practice.
Ti primeri služijo kot model za vse institucije in organe EU, kako se najbolje odzvati na vprašanja, ki jih zastavi varuh človekovih pravic.
These cases serve as a model for all EU institutions and bodies in terms of how best to react to issues that the Ombudsman raises.
V nekaterih primerih je mogoče doseči prijateljsko rešitev, če institucija ali organ pritožniku ponudi odškodnino.
In some cases, a friendly solution can be achieved if the institution or body concerned offers compensation to the complainant.
Takšne ponudbe so podane ex gratia , torej brez prevzemanja pravne odgovornosti in ustvarjanja pravnih precedensov.
Any such offer is made ex gratia , i.e. without admission of legal liability and without creating a legal precedent.
Tak primer je zadeva 1162/2007/FOR, kjer se je Svet strinjal, da bo ex gratia izplačal 1000 EUR kot priznanje za neprijetnosti in stres, ki ga je utrpel pritožnik.
An example is case 1162/2007/FOR, where the Council agreed to make an ex gratia payment of 1000 euro in the recognition of the inconvenience and stress that the complainant had suffered.
Ko sporazumna rešitev ni možna, varuh primer zaključi s kritično oceno ali pa pripravi osnutek priporočila.
When a friendly solution is not possible, the Ombudsman closes the case with a critical remark, or makes a draft recommendation.
Kritična ocena pritožniku potrdi, da je njegova pritožba upravičena, zadevni instituciji ali organu pa nakaže, kje je storil napako, kar pripomore k izogibanju nepravilnostim v prihodnje.
A critical remark confirms to the complainant that his or her complaint is justified and indicates to the institution or body concerned what it has done wrong, so as to help it avoid maladministration in the future.
Leta 2008 je varuh s kritično oceno zaključil 44 preiskav.
In 2008, the Ombudsman closed 44 inquiries with critical remarks.
Varuh človekovih pravic je na primer kritično ocenil Evropski parlament, ker je leta 2005 zavrnil prošnjo novinarja za podatke o nadomestilih, izplačanih petim malteškim poslancem, kot razlog pa je navedel varstvo podatkov.
The Ombudsman criticised e.g. the European Parliament, because it in 2005 had rejected a journalist's request for information about the allowances paid to the five Maltese MEPs, citing data protection reasons.
Novinar je vložil pritožbo pri varuhu človekovih pravic, saj je menil, da imajo davkoplačevalci pravico vedeti, kako poslanci trošijo javna sredstva.
The journalist lodged a complaint with the Ombudsman, arguing that taxpayers have a right to know how MEPs spend public money.
Varuh človekovih pravic je po posvetu z evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo osebnih podatkov, ki se je strinjal z njegovim stališčem, pozval Parlament, naj razkrije zahtevane podatke ob upoštevanju zakonite pravice javnosti, da lahko dostopa do teh dokumentov.
After having consulted the European Data Protection Supervisor, who agreed with the Ombudsman's position, the Ombudsman called on Parliament to disclose the requested information, in the light of the public's legal right of access to documents.
Varuh človekovih pravic je podal kritično oceno, v kateri je obžaloval, da Parlament ni upošteval zakonodaje, kakor jo razlaga Sodišče prve stopnje.
The Ombudsman issued a critical remark, regretting that Parliament had not complied with the law as interpreted by the Court of First Instance.
Vseeno pa je pozdravil odločitev Parlamenta, da bo na svojem spletnem mestu bolje obveščal javnost o nadomestilih poslancev.
He, however, welcomed Parliament's decision to better inform the public about MEPs' allowances via its website.
Pomembno je, da institucije in organi na podlagi kritične ocene varuha ukrepajo in začnejo reševati težave, zato da bi v prihodnje preprečili nepravilnosti.
It is important for the institutions and bodies to follow up on critical remarks from the Ombudsman, taking action to resolve outstanding problems and thus to avoid maladministration in the future.
Leta 2008 je varuh človekovih pravic na svojem spletnem mestu objavil dve študiji ukrepov, ki so jih zadevne institucije sprejele na podlagi kritičnih ocen in dodatnih ocen iz leta 2006 in 2007, da bi zagotovil, da bodo institucijam in organom napake v poduk in da se bodo v prihodnje izognili nepravilnostim.
It is with a view to ensuring that the institutions and bodies learn from their mistakes and that maladministration is avoided in future, that the Ombudsman published on his website, in 2008, two studies of the follow-up undertaken by the institutions involved to all critical remarks and further remarks issued in 2006 and 2007.
Če je mogoče, da zadevna institucija nepravilnosti odpravi, ali kadar so te izjemno hude ali imajo splošne posledice, varuh običajno pripravi osnutek priporočila za zadevno institucijo ali organ, ki se mora v treh mesecih odzvati s podrobnim mnenjem.
In cases where it is possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the instance of maladministration, or in cases where the maladministration is particularly serious, or has general implications, the Ombudsman normally makes a draft recommendation to the institution or body concerned, which must respond with a detailed opinion within three months.
Leta 2008 je bilo podanih osem osnutkov priporočil.
During 2008, eight draft recommendations were made.
Če se institucija ali organ na osnutek priporočila ne odzove zadovoljivo, lahko varuh Evropskemu parlamentu pošlje posebno poročilo.
If an institution or body fails to respond satisfactorily to a draft recommendation, the Ombudsman may send a special report to the European Parliament.
To je varuhovo orožje v skrajni sili in je zadnji bistveni korak, ki ga lahko stori pri obravnavi zadeve, saj je sprejetje resolucije in izvajanje parlamentarnih pooblastil stvar politične presoje Parlamenta.
This constitutes the Ombudsman's ultimate weapon and is the last substantive step he may take in dealing with a case, since the adoption of a resolution and the exercise of Parliament's powers are matters for the political judgment of the Parliament.
Leta 2008 je varuh Parlamentu predložil posebno poročilo, v katerem je kritiziral Komisijo zaradi starostne diskriminacije zunanjih tolmačev, o čemer je odbor za peticije, katerega poročevalec je bil Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, pripravil poročilo in 5. maja 2009
In 2008, the Ombudsman submitted one special report to Parliament, criticising the Commission for age discrimination of freelance interpreters, to which the Committee on Petitions, with Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez as rapporteur, drafted a report and adopted a resolution on 5. maj 2009
Varuh človekovih pravic je začel tudi tri preiskave na lastno pobudo.
The Ombudsman also launched three inquiries on his own initiative.
Dve sta bili v zvezi s primeri, ki so jih vložile nepooblaščene osebe (tj. pritožnik, ki ni državljan Unije oziroma v njej nima stalnega prebivališča ali pa ni pravna oseba s sedežem v državi članici).
Two of these concerned cases which had been submitted by a non-authorised person (i.e., a complainant who is not a citizen or resident of the Union or a legal person with a registered office in a Member State).
Tretji je zadeval uporabo pooblastila varuha človekovih pravic za lastno pobudo za reševanje na videz sistemskih težav v zvezi s sistemom Evropske komisije za zgodnje opozarjanje (OI/3/2008/FOR).
The third involved the use of the Ombudsman's own-initiative power to tackle what appeared to be a systemic problem concerning the European Commission's Early Warning System (OI/3/2008/FOR).
Leta 2008 je varuh na lastno pobudo zaključil preiskavo o pravočasnosti plačil Komisije.
In 2008, the Ombudsman concluded an own-initiative inquiry into the timeliness of payments by the Commission.
Preiskava je bila drugič začeta decembra 2007, pokazala pa je, da so zapoznela plačila še vedno velika težava.
The inquiry was launched for the second time in December 2007 and revealed, that late payment continues to constitute a serious problem.
Varuh človekovih pravic je pohvalil Komisijo za ukrepe, ki jih je že sprejela, da bi zmanjšala zamude pri plačilih, hkrati pa jo je pozval k dodatnim izboljšavam, zlasti kar zadeva ranljivejše pogodbenike, na primer posamezne državljane in srednje velika podjetja in organizacije.
While the Ombudsman commended the Commission for the measures already taken to reduce payment delays, he called on it to make further improvements, especially regarding more vulnerable contractors, such as individual citizens and small and medium-sized companies and organisations.
Napovedal je, da bo v začetku leta 2009 izvedel novo preiskavo.
The Ombudsman announced that he would carry out a new investigation in early 2009.
Kot nadomestno možnost za začetek pisne preiskave o morebitnih nepravilnostih in da bi hitro rešil pomembno težavo, varuh človekovih pravic v dogovoru in ob sodelovanju z zadevno institucijo ali organom uporablja neformalne, prožne postopke.
As an alternative to opening a written inquiry into possible maladministration, and with the aim of solving the relevant problem rapidly, the Ombudsman makes use of informal, flexible procedures, with the agreement and co-operation of the institution or body concerned.
Leta 2008 je bil po posredovanju varuha človekovih pravic rešena 101 zadeva, saj je dosegel hiter odgovor na neodgovorjeno korespondenco.
During 2008, 101 cases were settled after the Ombudsman's intervention succeeded in obtaining a rapid reply to unanswered correspondence.
Glavna prednostna naloga evropskega varuha človekovih pravic je zagotoviti, da se spoštujejo pravice državljanov iz prava Evropske unije na vseh ravneh v Uniji in da institucije in organi Evropske unije delujejo po najvišjih upravnih standardih.
The main priorities of the European Ombudsman is to ensure that citizens' rights under EU law are respected at every level in the Union and that EU institutions and bodies conform to the highest standards of administration.
Varuh si nenehno prizadeva za izboljšanje kakovosti podatkov, ki so na voljo državljanom in morebitnim pritožnikom v zvezi z njihovimi pravicami iz prava Evropske unije, zlasti preko evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic.
The Ombudsman has continued his efforts to improve the quality of information provided to citizens and potential complainants concerning their rights under EU law especially through the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Mrežo, v kateri je tudi odbor za peticije, sestavlja približno 90 uradov v 31 državah.
The Network, which includes the Committee on Petitions, consists of roughly 90 offices in 31 countries.
Njen namen je med drugim omogočiti hitrejši prenos pritožb pristojnemu varuhu ali podobnemu organu.
One of the purposes of the Network is to facilitate the rapid transfer of complaints to the competent ombudsman or similar body.
V letu 2008 je varuh 888 pritožnikom svetoval, naj se obrnejo na nacionalnega ali regionalnega varuha človekovih pravic, 191 pritožb pa je posredoval odboru za peticije.
During 2008, the Ombudsman advised 888 complainants to turn to a national or regional ombudsman, and 191 complainants were referred to the Committee on Petitions.
V nekaterih primerih se varuhu človekovih pravic zdi ustrezno, da pritožbo preusmeri na Komisijo ali na mrežo SOLVIT, ki jo je ustvarila Komisija, da bi pomagala tistim, ki se soočajo z ovirami, ko skušajo uveljavljati svoje pravice na notranjem trgu Unije.
In some cases, the Ombudsman considers it appropriate to transfer the complaint to the Commission or to SOLVIT, a network set up by the Commission to help people who face obstacles when trying to exercise their rights in the Union's internal market.
Preden preusmerijo pritožbo ali svetujejo pritožniku, varuhove službe vedno naredijo vse, da zagotovijo najustreznejši nasvet.
Before transferring a complaint or advising the complainant, the Ombudsman's services make every effort to ensure that the most appropriate advice is given.
Varuh si prizadeva, da bi bile institucije in organi Evropske unije pri svojem delovanju osredotočene na državljane, in sicer skuša pritožnikom dati vse možnosti za dosego sporazumne rešitve in sproža več preiskav na lastno pobudo, da bi prepoznal težave in spodbujal najboljšo prakso.
The Ombudsman strive to make certain that the EU institutions and bodies adopt a citizen-centred approach in all their activities, by seeking every opportunity to achieve friendly solutions to complaints and by launching more inquiries on his own initiative in order to identify problems and encourage best practice.
Ker je pomembno, da bodo tisti, ki imajo morebiti težave z upravo Evropske unije, seznanjeni s svojo pravico do pritožbe varuhu človekovih pravic, je varuh s svojim osebjem v letu 2008 pripravil več kot 75 predstavitev, konferenc, seminarjev in srečanj.
In the light of the importance of ensuring that those who might have problems with the EU administration know about their right to complain to the Ombudsman, 75 presentations were made by the Ombudsman and his staff at conferences, seminars, and meetings during 2008.
Opravil je informativni obisk na Cipru, v Grčiji, Latviji in Litvi, da bi v teh državah širil osveščenost o svoji vlogi.
The Ombudsman also made information visits to Cyprus, Greece, Latvia and Lithuania with a view to promote awareness of the Ombudsman's role in these countries.
Izvedel je tudi šest tiskovnih konferenc, dal čez 30 intervjujev, objavljenih pa je bilo 17 sporočil za javnost, ki so bila posredovana novinarjem in zainteresiranim po vsej Evropi.
He also gave six press conferences and over 30 interviews, and 17 press releases were issued and distributed to journalists and interested parties throughout Europe.
Med publikacijami, pripravljenimi in razširjenimi leta 2008 je bil nov vodnik po delu varuha človekovih pravic v 23 uradnih jezikih EU.
Amongst the particular interesting publications produced and distributed in 2008 was a new guide to the Ombudsman's work, produced in the 23 official EU languages.
Publikacija je bila razdeljena ključnim interesnim skupinam in splošni javnosti.
This publication was distributed to key stakeholders and to the general public.
Varuhovo spletno mesto so v 2008 redno posodabljali, tako da je postalo sodobno, dinamično in interaktivno ter so se na njem stalno razvijale storitve za državljane, konec leta 2009 pa je bilo končno objavljeno novo spletno mesto.
The Ombudsman's website was updated regularly during 2008 in order to transform it to a modern, dynamic, interactive and constantly evolving service to citizens, and the new website was finally launched at the beginning of 2009.