natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(b) zahteve iz točke B se uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2014 ;
(b) requirements referred to in point B shall apply from 1 January 2014 ;
(c) zahteve iz točke C se uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2014 .
(c) requirements referred to in point C shall apply from 1 January 2014 .
(c) zahteve iz točke C se uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2016 .
(c) requirements referred to in point C shall apply from 1 January 2016 .
Nove države članice lahko to možnost uporabijo tudi v primeru, da se odločijo prenehati z uporabo sheme enotnega plačila na površino pred koncem roka iz odstavka 9.
New Member States may apply this option also in the case where they decide to terminate the application of the single area payment scheme before the end of the period of application provided for in paragraph 9.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 5, TOČKA (C)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5, POINT (C)
Člen 143 b, odstavek 9, prvi stavek (Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003)
Article 143 b, paragraph 9, first sentence (Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003)
V okviru uredb iz odstavka 11 je za vsako novo državo članico shema enotnega plačila na površino na voljo do konca leta 2010 .
For any new Member States the single area payment scheme shall be available for a period of application until the end of 2010 .
V okviru uredb iz odstavka 11 je za vsako novo državo članico shema enotnega plačila na površino na voljo do konca leta 2013 .
For any new Member States the single area payment scheme shall be available for a period of application until the end of 2013 .
Z gospodarskega vidika je v novih državah članicah skoraj nemogoče upravičiti spremembo sedanjega sistema neposrednih plačil sheme enotnega plačila na površino v shemo enotnega plačila že od leta 2010 dalje, namesto od leta 2013.
It is economically hardly possible to justify for the majority of NMS to change the present direct payment system of SAPS to SPS model starting from year 2010 instead of 2013.
Za uvedbo sheme enotnega plačila leta 2010 bi morale nove države članice že pričeti priprave in pri tem porabiti ogromne vsote denarja za sistem, ki utegne delovati le dve do tri leta.
In order to start the SPS system in 2010 the NMS should already begin their preparatory work spending huge amount of money for the system that might function only for 2-3 years.
To bo povzročilo dodatno in nepotrebno finančno breme za države članice, ki bodo 100 % neposrednih plačil prejele šele v letu 2013.
This will cause additional and unnecessary financial burden for Member States that will obtain their 100% direct payments no sooner than in year 2013.
Člen 145, točka (m) (Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003)
Article 145, point (m) (Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003)
(5a) V členu 145 se točka (m) nadomesti z naslednjim:
(5a) In Article 145, point (m) is replaced by the following:
„(m) pravila za upravne preglede in preglede na kraju samem in z uporabo daljinskega zaznavanja.
"(m) rules on the administrative and on-the-spot checks and the checks by remote sensing.
V primeru kontrol v skladu z naslovom II poglavja 1 zagotavljajo sprejeti predpisi redno in ustrezno predhodno obveščanje o pregledu na kraju samem, če to ne ogrozi cilja teh kontrol.
In the case of controls pursuant to Title II Chapter 1 the rules laid down shall provide for regular and sufficient advance notice of on-the-spot checks where this does not jeopardise the actual goal of the controls.
Predpisi prav tako spodbujajo države članice, da vzpostavijo sistem učinkovitih in skladnih kontrol.“
The rules shall also provide for incentives for Member States to put in place a system of well-functioning and coherent controls."
Obstaja soglasje, da so kontrole na kraju samem nujne, kadar je to mogoče, ker ni pravično in razumno pričakovati, da bo imel sodobni kmet na voljo čas za poglobljene in dolgotrajne kontrole brez predhodnega obvestila.
There is consensus that, where possible, on-the-spot-controls are necessary, as it is not just and reasonable to expect a modern farmer to have the time available for extensive and time-consuming controls without advance notice.
Napovedane kontrole se omejijo na vidike, pri katerih bo predhodno obveščanje kmetom omogočilo vplivanje na rezultat.
Announced controls shall be limited to aspects where advance notice will allow farmers to manipulate the result.
Člen 51, odstavek 3, pododstavek 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 1698/2005)
Article 51, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005)
Odstopanje iz prvega pododstavka se uporablja do 31. decembra 2008.
The derogation provided for in the first subparagraph shall apply until 31 December 2008.
Od 1. januarja 2009 mora kmet, ki prejema plačila v okviru sheme enotnega plačila na površino, spoštovati predpisane zahteve ravnanja iz Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003 v skladu z naslednjim časovnim razporedom:
As from 1 January 2009 a farmer receiving payments under the single area payment scheme shall respect the statutory management requirements referred to in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 according to the following timetable:
(a) zahteve iz točke A se uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2009;
(a) requirements referred to in point A shall apply from1 January 2009;
Vendar je za Bolgarijo in Romunijo uporaba členov 3, 4, 6, 7 in 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 do 31. decembra 2011 neobvezna, v kolikor se navedene določbe nanašajo na predpisane zahteve ravnanja.
However, for Bulgaria and Romania, the application of Articles 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 shall be optional until 31 December 2011 insofar as those provisions relate to statutory management requirements.
Od 1. januarja 2012 mora kmet, ki prejema plačila v okviru sheme enotnega plačila na površino, spoštovati predpisane zahteve ravnanja iz Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003 v skladu z naslednjim časovnim razporedom:
As from 1 January 2012 a farmer receiving payments under the single area payment scheme shall respect the statutory management requirements referred to in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 according to the following timetable:
Uvedba navzkrižne skladnosti je bila ključni del reforme skupne kmetijske politike iz leta 2003.
The introduction of cross compliance was a key element of the 2003 reform of the Common Agriculture Policy.
Navzkrižna skladnost je bila določena kot pogoj za dodelitev javne podpore kmetom.
Cross compliance was made a precondition to public support for farmers.
S tem se je prvi steber začel spreminjati v smeri politike razvoja podeželja, ker kmetje prejemajo plačila za storitve, ki jih zagotavljajo širši družbi.
Herewith changing the first pillar in the direction of rural development policy, as farmers are being paid for services they render to the wider society.
Nadomestila za delovanje prejemajo v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti na področjih okolja, javnega zdravja, zdravja rastlin in živali ter dobrega počutja živali, ki je v primerjavi s standardi v preostalih delih sveta na splošno zelo stroga.
Farmers are being compensated for complying with Community legislation in the field of environment, public, animal and plant health and animal welfare, which are generally very strict compared to standards in the rest of the world.
Čeprav je bila navzkrižna skladnost široko sprejeta, je bila na začetku deležna kritik zaradi birokratskih obremenitev, povezanih z njenim izvajanjem, za kmete in uprave držav članic.
Though supported widely cross compliance has from the beginning encountered criticism for the bureaucratic burden linked with its application for farmers as well as for Member States administrations.
Poleg tega je za kontrole zelo težko pooblastiti en nadzorni organ, ker je treba vključiti več različnih sektorjev in strokovnjakov.
In addition it is very difficult to concentrate controls with one control body as many different sectors and specialists need to be involved.
Izvedbeni predpisi Komisije ne določajo predhodnega obveščanja o kontrolah, kar ob upoštevanju obsega in dolgotrajnosti kontrol ter današnjih pogojev kmetovanja povzroča veliko obremenitev kmetov.
Commissions' implementation rules foresee no advance notice of controls, which, taken into consideration the extent and length of controls as well as today's farming conditions, places a heavy burden on farmers shoulders.
Približno 68 % primerov neskladnosti je bilo obravnavanih kot manjši in so povzročili sankcije v višini 1 % neposrednih plačil.
About 68% of cases of non-compliance were considered minor and led to sanctions of 1% of direct payments..
71 % primerov neskladnosti je zadevalo označevanje in registracijo goveda (zlasti izgubo ene ušesne znamke ali primere, ko je bilo govedo registrirano na osrednji ravni, ne pa tudi v poslovnih knjigah kmetij, kar pa ni ogrozilo sledljivosti).
71% of cases of non-compliance concerned labelling and registration of cattle (mostly loss of one ear mark or cases where cattle were registered centrally but not in books kept on the farm, therefore not putting into danger retracebility).
Izvedbeni predpisi niso določali postopkov za primere manjše neskladnosti in tudi sistem ni vključeval možnosti, da se v teh primerih uporabijo sankcije.
Implementation rules foresaw no procedures for minor cases of non-compliance nor did the system foresee a possibility not to forego sanction in these cases.
Zato so kmetje sistem sankcij pogosto obravnavali kot nesorazmeren in diskriminatoren do nekaterih vrst kmetij, zlasti živinorejskih.
The sanction system was therefore often deemed disproportionate by farmers as well as discriminating against certain types of farms, notably farms holding animals.
Izvajanje navzkrižne skladnosti se med državami članicami precej razlikuje in svetovalni sistemi za kmete pogosto ne delujejo na način, ki bi omogočil zmanjšanje obremenitev kmetov.
Cross compliance is implemented quite differently from one Member State to the other and advisory systems for farmers often do not function in a way to alleviate the burden on farmers.
Komisija je predstavila poročilo o uporabi sistema navzkrižne skladnosti (KOM(2007) 147 konč.), ki je povzelo kritike.
The Commission presented a 'Report on the application of the system of cross-compliance' (COM (2007) 147 fin.) which summarised the criticism.
Predlagana sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 je del prizadevanja Komisije za uresničevanje sklepov tega poročila.
The proposed change of regulation (EC) 1782/2003 is part of the Commission´ effort to implement the conclusions of its report.
O spremembah izvedbenih predpisov Komisije zdaj poteka razprava s Svetom.
Changes to Commissions implementing rules are presently discussed with the Council.
Ugotovitve poročevalca
Rapporteurs Conclusions
Poročevalec podpira sistem navzkrižne skladnosti, ker verjame, da je pomemben instrument za potrjevanje upravičenosti kmetov do javne podpore.
The rapporteur supports the system of cross compliance as he believes it to be an important instrument for the justification of public support to farmers.
Vendar je očitno, da zapleten sistem, kot je navzkrižna skladnost, ne more delovati brez podpore kmetov, ki jih zadeva.
Yet, it is clear that a complicated system like cross compliance cannot function without the support of the farmers concerned.
Zato je treba sistem navzkrižne skladnosti in zakonodajo na tem področju nenehno poenostavljati, deregulirati in izboljševati.
Therefore the cross compliance system itself, as well as the legislation falling under the scope of cross compliance should be simplified, deregulated and improved continuously.
Ob upoštevanju številčnih podatkov iz poročila Komisije je jasno, da večina pregledanih kmetij deluje v skladu z določenimi standardi ter da velika večina primerov neskladnosti zadeva manjše, zanemarljive ali celo odvečne zakonske zahteve.
Looking at the numbers presented by the Commission in its report it is clear that most controlled farms do comply with set standards, the overwhelming number of cases of non-compliance concerning minor or negligible if not superfluous legal requirements.
Zato poročevalec v celoti podpira vsa prizadevanja za poenostavitev navzkrižne skladnosti, če to ne bo ogrozilo zastavljenih ciljev.
The rapporteur therefore supports fully any effort to simplify cross compliance as long as the goals pursued are not put into danger.
Predlog Komisije je jasen korak naprej.
The Commissions proposal is a clear step forward.
Kljub temu pa predlaga nekatere spremembe za pojasnitev, da so poenostavitev, deregulacija, izboljšanje in usklajevanje dolgotrajni postopki.
Nonetheless some changes are being proposed as to underline that simplification, deregulation, improvement and harmonisation is a continuous process.
Zato poročevalec predlaga redno poročanje Komisije, ki bi se osredotočalo tudi na stroške celotnega kontrolnega sistema, da se zagotovi ustrezna analiza stroškov in koristi v prihodnosti.
I therefore proposed a regular reporting by the Commission focusing also on the costs of the whole controlling system, in order to enable proper cost benefit analysis in the future.
Če bi vsi primeri manjše neskladnosti povzročili povečanje kontrol, kot predvideva Komisija, to ne bi bilo sorazmerno in državam članicam ne bi pomagalo pri obvladovanju upravnih delovnih obremenitev.
If all cases of minor non-compliance led to increased controls as foreseen by the Commission this would neither be proportionate nor help Member States to cope with the administrative work-load.
Zato so predlagane manjše spremembe predloga Komisije.
Minor changes to the Commission proposal are therefore presented.
Nekateri standardi, zlasti glede omrežja Natura 2000, niso prilagojeni sistemu sistematičnih kontrol na kraju samem.
Some standards, especially on Nature-2000, are not adapted to a system of systematic-on-the spot-controls.
Zato je treba razmisliti o zamenjavi sistematičnih kontrol z učinkovitim sistemom navzkrižnih preverjanj (v primeru Nature 2000 so bili skoraj vsi primeri neskladnosti ugotovljeni z navzkrižnim preverjanjem).
It should therefore be considered to replace systematic controls with a well functioning system of cross-checks (in case of Nature-2000 almost all cases of non-compliance were detected through cross-checks anyway).
Novim državam članicam, ki si prizadevajo za vzpostavitev kmetijske uprave, ki bi obravnavala vse zahteve obsežne evropske kmetijske zakonodaje, in še ne prejemajo celotnega zneska javne podpore, je treba odobriti obdobje postopnega uvajanja, ki bo nekoliko daljše od predloga Komisije in v skladu s postopnim uvajanjem neposrednih plačil.
New Member States that are struggling to put into place a farm administration covering all demands of Europe's extensive farm legislation and who do not yet receive the full amount of public support should be granted a period of phasing-in, shortly longer than proposed by the Commission and in line with the phasing-in of direct payments.
Poročilo ne vključuje vseh vidikov navzkrižne skladnosti, ker se več vprašanj obravnava le v izvedbenih predpisih Komisije, in očitno je, da je v zvezi z nekaterimi vidiki potrebna dodatna razprava.
The report does not cover all aspects of cross-compliance as many questions are only dealt with in Commission implementation rules and some aspects clearly need to be discussed further.
Obveznost rednega poročanja bo zagotovila, da se bo navzkrižna skladnost redno obravnavala.
An obligation to report regularly will make sure that cross compliance will stay on the agenda.
Jasno je tudi, da morajo vse vključene strani, ne le Komisija, ampak zlasti države članice, zagotoviti vzpostavitev čim preprostejšega sistema, ki bo izpolnjeval zahteve družbe.
It is also clear that all parties involved, not only the Commission, but especially Member States need to make sure to put into place a system that fulfils demands of society but is as simple as possible.
Razširitev sedanjega sklopa standardov, o kateri se je razpravljalo v povezavi s prihodnjim pregledom skupne kmetijske politike, bi lahko na splošno škodila sistemu, ker smo še na začetni stopnji izvajanja.
An extension of the current set of standards, as discussed by some in connection with the upcoming health-check of the CAP, could be detrimental to the system overall considering that we are still in an early stage of implementation.
Razen tega je treba nove upravne stroške in stroške usklajevanja, povezane z neposrednimi plačili, ob upoštevanju zmanjševanja pomoči za kmete obravnavati zadržano.
In addition, new administrative and compliance costs linked to direct payments should be eyed with suspicion in the light of decreasing aid for farmers.
Sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike (sprememba uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003) in podpora za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) (sprememba uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005)
Direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o popisih prebivalstva in stanovanj
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on population and housing censuses
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ....................................................................8
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT..................................23
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0069 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0069 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 285(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0078/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0078/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter mnenja odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0471/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0471/2007 ),
(2) Občasni statistični podatki o prebivalstvu in o glavnih družinskih, socialnih, ekonomskih in stanovanjskih značilnostih posameznikov so potrebni za preučevanje in opredelitev regionalnih in socialnih politik, ki vplivajo na posamezne sektorje Skupnosti.
(2) Periodic statistical data on the population and on the main family, social, economic and housing characteristics of individuals are necessary for the study and definition of regional and social policies affecting particular sectors of the community ;
(2) Občasni statistični podatki o prebivalstvu in o glavnih družinskih, socialnih, ekonomskih in stanovanjskih značilnostih posameznikov so potrebni za preučevanje in opredelitev regionalnih , socialnih in okoljskih politik, ki vplivajo na posamezne sektorje Skupnosti.
(2) Periodic statistical data on the population and on the main family, social, economic and housing characteristics of individuals are necessary for the study and definition of regional , social , and environmental policies affecting particular sectors of the community .
Podrobne informacije o stanovanjih je treba zbrati zlasti v podporo različnim dejavnostim Skupnosti, na primer spodbujanju socialnega vključevanja in spremljanju socialne kohezije na regionalni ravni ali varstvu okolja in spodbujanju energetske učinkovitosti.
In particular, there is a need to collect detailed information on housing in support of various Community activities such as the promotion of social inclusion and the monitoring of social cohesion at regional level, or the protection of the environment and the promotion of energy efficiency .
Okoljske politike so zdaj v žarišču, zato bi jih bilo treba izvajati in preučevati tudi ob upoštevanju razpoložljivih demografskih podatkov.
Environmental policies are now on the agenda and should likewise be implemented and studied in the light of the demographic information available.
(3) Za čim bolj smiselno uporabo podatkov pri primerjavah med državami članicami se morajo taki podatki nanašati na določeno leto , ki se opredeli.
(3) In order for the most judicious use possible to be made of the data in drawing comparisons between Member States, such data should refer to a given year to be defined ;
(3) Za zagotovitev primerljivosti podatkov, ki jih posredujejo države članice, in zanesljivosti pregledov, izdelanih na ravni Unije, se morajo podatki nanašati na isto referenčno leto.
(3) In order to ensure the comparability of the data provided by the Member States and for reliable overviews to be drawn up at Community level, the data used should refer to the same reference year .
Namen tega predloga spremembe je pojasniti povezavo med tem, da je treba posredovati podatke za isto referenčno leto, in osnovno zahtevo po primerljivosti, kar zadeva preglede, izdelane na ravni Skupnosti.
This rewording is intended to make clear the link between the need for data to be provided for the same reference year and the basic requirement for comparability with regard to the overviews produced at Community level.
(4) V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 322/97 z dne 17. februarja 1997 o statističnih podatkih Skupnosti, ki pomeni referenčni okvir za določbe te uredbe, se mora zbirka statističnih podatkov skladati s standardi nepristranskosti, zanesljivosti, objektivnosti, znanstvene neodvisnosti, stroškovne učinkovitosti in zaupnosti statističnih podatkov.
(4) In accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 322/97 of 17 February 1997 on Community Statistics which constitutes the reference framework for the provisions of this regulation , it is necessary that the collection of statistics conforms to standards of impartiality, reliability, objectivity, scientific independence, cost-effectiveness, and statistical confidentiality ;
(4) V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 322/97 z dne 17. februarja 1997 o statističnih podatkih Skupnosti, ki pomeni referenčni okvir za določbe te uredbe, se mora zbirka statističnih podatkov skladati s standardi nepristranskosti, preglednost, zanesljivosti, objektivnosti, znanstvene neodvisnosti, stroškovne učinkovitosti in zaupnosti statističnih podatkov.
(4) In accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 322/97 of 17 February 1997 on Community Statistics , which constitutes the reference framework for the provisions of this Regulation , it is necessary that the collection of statistics conforms to standards of impartiality, transparency, reliability, objectivity, scientific independence, cost-effectiveness, and statistical confidentiality .
Pri zbiranju statističnih podatkov po različnih državah članicah je treba omeniti preglednost, saj postopki ne bodo usklajeni.
It is important to make the point that statistics should be collected in the Member States in a transparent way, bearing in mind that the procedures will not be harmonised.
(8) Zlasti je treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastilo za vzpostavitev pogojev za prilagoditev opredelitev, določitev nadaljnjih referenčnih let in sprejetje programa statističnih podatkov in metapodatkov.
(8) In particular, power should be conferred on the Commission to establish the conditions for the adaptation of definitions, the establishment of the further reference years and the adoption of the programme of the statistical data and metadata.
Te ukrepe splošnega obsega, oblikovane za spremembo nebistvenih sestavin te uredbe, je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES –
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this regulation they should be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC .
(8) Zlasti je treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastilo za vzpostavitev pogojev za določitev zaporednih referenčnih let in sprejetje programa statističnih podatkov in metapodatkov.
(8) In particular, power should be conferred on the Commission to establish the conditions for the establishment of subsequent reference years and the adoption of the programme of the statistical data and metadata.