natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kar zadeva bolj konkretne ukrepe in dejanja, tudi v zvezi s poenostavitvijo zakonodajnega okvira, se predlaga, da naj Komisija preuči način za uskladitev pravil, ki urejajo različne instrumente.
As regards the more concrete measures and actions, also in the context of simplifying the legislative framework, it is proposed that the Commission should explore ways of harmonising the rules governing the different instruments.
To v svojem usmerjevalnem dokumentu omenja dosedanji komisar Pawel Samecki v zvezi z uskladitvijo pravil za upravičenost, pravil o davku na dodano vrednost in pridobivanju zemljišč.
A reference to it has been made in the orientation paper of the outgoing Commissionner, Pawel Samecki regarding the harmonisation of eligibility rules, rules on value added tax and land acquisition.
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji o najboljši praksi na področju regionalne politike in ovirah za uporabo sredstev iz strukturnih skladov že pozval k zasnovi posebnih meril ocenjevanja inovativnih projektov, ki zaradi večjega tveganja dopuščajo višjo stopnjo napak.
The European Parliament in its resolution on the Best practices in the field of regional policy and obstacles to the use of the Structural Funds already called for the development of specific evaluation criteria for the assessment of innovative projects, given the higher risk and thus higher failure ratio of these actions.
V prihodnjem zakonodajnem okviru kohezijske politike bi lahko sprejeli nadaljnje ureditvene pobude z namenom spodbujanja raziskav in inovacij.
Further regulatory incentives could be introduced in the future legislative framework of cohesion policy with the aim to foster research and innovation.
Poročevalec pričakuje, da bo Komisija predstavila predloge v zvezi s tem.
The Rapporteur expects that the Commision will present proposals in this respect.
Ob poudarjanju dejstva, da je nadnacionalno sodelovanje v sedmem okvirnem programu in programu za konkurenčnost in inovativnost „pravilo“ in da je nadnacionalno, mednarodno in čezmejno sodelovanje vključeno v kohezijsko politiko, poročevalec nazadnje predlaga, da se preuči večji pomen cilja evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja v prihodnosti, pri čemer bi bila posebna pozornost namenjena ukrepom, povezanim z inovacijami in raziskavami.
Finally, highlighting the fact that transnational cooperation is the “norm” in FP7 and CIP, and transnational, international and cross-border cooperation is mainstreamed in cohesion policy, The Rapporteur proposes to consider increasing the weight of the European territorial cooperation objective in the future, with special attention to innovation and research related actions.
Za zdaj ima ta cilj omejena finančna sredstva, zato lahko financira samo „blažje“ intervencije.
At present this objective has limited financial resources and thus can only finance “soft” interventions.
Ne glede na to pa se uresničujejo nove pobude, denimo Regije za gospodarsko spremembo, da bi omogočili in preverili hitro širjenje inovativnih zamisli v programe regionalne politike.
Nevertheless, the new initiatives covered, such as Regions for Economic Change, are put in place to enable and test the rapid dissemination of innovative ideas into regional policy programmes.
o uresničevanju sinergij med namenskimi sredstvi za raziskave in inovacije po Uredbi (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj in sedmem okvirnem programu za raziskave in razvoj v mestih, regijah, državah članicah in Uniji
on the implementation of the synergies of research and innovation earmarked funds in Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 concerning the European Fund of Regional Development and the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development in cities and regions as well as in the Member States and the Union
1. meni, da so raziskave in inovacije odločilne pri odzivu na svetovne izzive ter da se inovacije lahko učinkoviteje obravnavajo na regionalni ali lokalni ravni;
Believes that research and innovation are crucial to addressing global challenges and that innovation can be more effectively addressed at regional or local level;
3. z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je za obdobje 2007–2013 v strukturnih skladih za podporo inovacijam namenjenih 86 milijard EUR (25 % celotnega zneska), pri tem pa je za temeljne raziskave in tehnološki razvoj namenjenih 50 milijard EUR, kar je toliko kot celotni proračun sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave;
Notes with satisfaction that, for the period 2007-2013, within the Structural Funds (SF) EUR 86 billion is allocated in support of innovation (25% of the total amount), of which the allocation for core research and technological development (R&D) amounts to EUR 50 billion, equal to the total budget of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7);
5. meni, da upravna kultura, ki spodbuja sodelovanje med sektorji in stalni dialog med različnimi političnimi skupnostmi prispeva h krepitvi politične skladnosti;
Believes that an administrative culture that promotes cross-sectoral co-operation and continuous dialogue between different policy communities contributes to the strengthening of policy coherence;
7. glede na to, da organi za izvajanje zadevnih instrumentov EU obstajajo na različnih ravneh (nadnacionalni, nacionalni in podnacionalni) in da delujejo po različnih načelih (npr. kohezija ali odličnost), meni, da je zagotavljanje resnične skladnosti politike velik izziv, zlasti „na terenu“, kjer se instrumenti EU prepletajo z nacionalnimi in regionalnimi politikami;
Believes – given the fact that the implementing bodies of the EU instruments concerned exist on different levels (supranational, national and sub-national) and are governed by a different rationale (e.g. cohesion vs. excellence) – that the guaranteeing of actual policy coherence constitutes a major challenge, especially ‘on the ground’ where EU instruments mix with national and regional policies;
13. poudarja, da so raziskave in inovacije, zlasti za doseganje nizkih ali ničnih emisij ogljika ter prihranek energije, zelo pomembne za spoprijemanje z globalnimi izzivi, kot so podnebne spremembe in zanesljiva oskrba z energijo, pa tudi za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti na regionalni in lokalni ravni;
Points out that research and innovation, in particular as regards the development of low or zero carbon emissions and energy savings, are of critical importance for addressing global challenges, such as climate change and security of energy supplies, and also for improving competitiveness at regional and local level;
François Alfonsi, Charalampos Angourakis, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Viktor Uspaskich, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller
François Alfonsi, Charalampos Angourakis, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Viktor Uspaskich, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller
o preglednosti regionalne politike in njenem financiranju
on transparency in regional policy and its funding
Poročevalec: Michail Tremopoulos
Rapporteur: Michail Tremopoulos
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti členov 174 do 178 Pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 174‑178 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1828/2006 z dne 8. decembra 2006 o pravilih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu ter Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 of 8 December 2006 setting out rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 284/2009 z dne 7. aprila 2009 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu v zvezi z nekaterimi določbami glede finančnega upravljanja
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 284/2009 of 7 April 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund concerning certain provisions relating to financial management
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. maja 2009 o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj v zvezi z upravičenostjo naložb v energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije pri stanovanjskih objektih
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 397/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of energy efficiency and renewable energy investments in housing
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. aprila 2008 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, Oddelek III – Komisija
– having regard to the decision of the European Parliament of 22 April 2008 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2006, section III – Commission
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. februarja 2008 o preglednosti pri finančnih zadevah
– having regard to its resolution of 19 February 2008 on transparency in financial matters
UL C 184 E, 6.8.2009, str.
OJ C 184 E, 6.8.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2009 o izvajanju Uredbe o strukturnih skladih 2007–2013: rezultati pogajanj glede nacionalnih strategij in operativnih programov kohezijske politike
– having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2009 on the implementation of the Structural Funds Regulation 2007-2013: the results of the negotiations on the national cohesion strategies and the operational programmes
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0165 . ;
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0165 . ,
– ob upoštevanju študije Evropskega parlamenta z naslovom Pobuda za preglednost podatkov in njen vpliv na kohezijsko politiko,
– having regard to the study published by the European Parliament entitled ‘The Data Transparency Initiative and its Impact on Cohesion Policy’,
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 3. maja 2006 o Pobudi za preglednost v Evropi ( KOM(2006)0194 ),
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper of 3 May 2006 on the European Transparency Initiative ( COM(2006)0194 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2009 z naslovom 20. letno poročilo o izvajanju strukturnih skladov (2008) ( KOM(2009)0617 /2),
– having regard to the Commission’s communication of 21 December 2009 entitled ‘20th annual report on implementation of the structural funds (2008)’ ( COM(2009)0617 /2),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7‑0139/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7‑0139/2010 ),
A. ker je Komisija leta 2005 sprejela pobudo za preglednost v Evropi (ETI), leta 2006 pa objavila zeleno knjigo, da bi izboljšali preglednost, odprtost in odgovornost upravljanja EU, in ker pobuda za preglednost v Evropi temelji na zagotavljanju javnih podatkov o prejemnikih sredstev EU,
A. whereas the European Transparency Initiative (ETI) was adopted by the Commission in 2005, followed by the publication of the Green Paper in 2006 with the aim of improving the transparency, openness and accountability of EU governance, and whereas providing public information on the recipients of EU funds is a cornerstone of the ETI,
B. ker se v skupnem sistemu upravljanja z informacijami o prejemnikih sredstev EU upravlja na ravni držav članic, ker na ravni EU ni posebne obveznosti, ker ni strogega „usmerjanja“ s strani Komisije in ker se stopnja javne dostopnosti do podatkov bistveno razlikuje v posameznih državah članicah, zaradi česar je primerjava na ravni EU zelo težka,
B. whereas, under the shared management system, information on beneficiaries of EU funds is managed at Member State level, and whereas, in the absence of a specific EU obligation or a strong ‘steer’ from the Commission, the level to which such information is made public differs substantially from Member State to Member State, making an EU-wide comparison difficult,
C. ker razkritje prejemnikov sredstev EU omogoča sodelovanje javnosti v pomembni razpravi o porabi javnega denarja, kar je bistvenega pomena za delujočo demokracijo,
C. whereas the disclosure of EU fund recipients enables public participation in a meaningful debate about how public money is spent, which is essential for functioning democracies,
D. ker ni bila vzpostavljena povezava med pobudo za preglednost v Evropi in finančnim nadzorom in revizijo, ki sta bolj določena in zavezujoča,
D. whereas no link has been established between the ETI and the more regulated and binding issue of financial controls and auditing,
E. ker bi morala pobuda za preglednost v Evropi pomembno vplivati na zagotavljanje preglednega partnerstva v predhodnih in nadaljnjih stopnjah kohezijskega programskega cikla; ker pa uredbe ne določajo natančno, v kolikšni meri naj bi bili partnerji vključeni v različne postopke načrtovanja programov, pa tudi ne opredeljujejo ureditve takega sodelovanja,
E. whereas the ETI should have a significant effect in terms of ensuring transparent partnerships in the upstream and downstream phases of the cohesion programming cycle; whereas, however, the regulations do not spell out the specific extent to which partners should be involved in the different programming processes or specify arrangements for such involvement,
F. ker ni dovolj predhodnih informacij o sklepih Komisije o financiranju velikih projektov, zato tudi ni preglednosti, in ker bi bilo to treba odpraviti,
F. whereas there is insufficient prior information about Commission decisions on the funding of major projects, and thus a lack of transparency, and whereas this should be remedied,
G. ker bi moralo biti načelo preglednosti povezano s procesom poenostavljanja postopkov za pridobivanje strukturnih sredstev,
G. whereas the logic of transparency should go hand in hand with the process of simplifying the procedures for obtaining Structural Funds;
Razkritje podatkov o prejemnikih kohezijskih sredstev
Disclosure of data on beneficiaries of cohesion funding
4. poudarja, da je treba izboljšati uporabnost posredovanih podatkov o prejemnikih po vsebini in predstavitvi; zato poziva Komisijo, naj natančno opredeli strukturo, obliko in vsebino posredovanih informacij ter s tem določi natančno in obvezno obliko; meni, da bi moralo zagotavljanje potrebnih informacij olajšati tudi iskanje po merilih, da bi takoj dobili pregled nad iskanimi elementi;
Stresses that the usefulness of the data provided on beneficiaries needs to be improved in terms of both content and presentation; calls, therefore, on the Commission to define a more detailed and prescriptive format specifying the structure, form and content of the information to be provided; believes that providing the necessary information should also facilitate a criterion-based search with a view to obtaining an immediate picture of the elements sought;
Preglednost in skupno upravljanje
Transparency and shared management
10. ugotavlja, da se čezmejni in nadnacionalni programi soočajo s posebnimi težavami zaradi različnih upravnih kultur, nacionalnih predpisov in jezikov, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah, kar vpliva ne samo na količinske, ampak tudi na kakovostne vidike takih pobud; zato meni, da je zelo pomembno, da se oblikujejo posebna pravila o preglednosti pri usklajevanju in sodelovanju različnih organov upravljanja;
Notes that cross-border and transnational programmes face specific difficulties due to the different administrative culture, national regulations and languages being used in Member States, that affect not just the quantitative, but also the qualitative aspects of such initiatives; considers therefore that development of specific rules regarding transparency in coordination and cooperation among different managing authorities would be most important;
14. poziva Komisijo, naj spremlja uporabo večjih predplačil, ki jih države članice prejmejo v skladu s poenostavitvami iz leta 2009 v povezavi z Uredbo Sveta št. 1083/2006;
Requests the Commission to monitor the utilisation of increased advance payments received by the Member States in accordance with the 2009 simplifications related to Council’s Regulation 1083/2006;
Preglednost in partnerstvo
Transparency and partnership
20. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi boljša navodila za praktično uresničevanje določbe o partnerstvu v sedanjih programih ter dovolj zavezujoča pravila o partnerstvu v prihodnjih zakonodajnih besedilih, zlasti glede vključevanja regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti, tj. voljenih teles, ki so glavni partnerji v celotnem procesu;
Calls for more guidance from the Commission on how to put the partnership clause into practice under current programmes, and for sufficiently binding rules on partnership in future regulatory texts, particularly as regards the involvement of regional and local authorities, i.e. elected bodies, which are essential partners in the whole process;
Boljša preglednost pri sredstvih EU za velike projekte
Improving transparency in respect of EU funding of major projects
JAVNO OBVEŠČANJE O PREJEMNIKIH KOHEZIJSKIH SREDSTEV
PUBLIC INFORMATION ON RECIPIENTS OF COHESION FUNDING
Temelj pobude za preglednost v Evropi je zagotavljanje javnih informacij o prejemnikih sredstev iz skladov EU.
Providing public information on the recipients of EU-funds is a corner stone of the European Transparency Initiative (ETI).
Člen 30(3) in člen 53b(2)(d) finančne uredbe določata, da morajo države članice posredovati podatke o porabi sredstev iz skladov EU v okviru skupnega upravljanja, zlasti z naknadnimi letnimi objavami prejemnikov.
Articles 30(3) and 53b §2 d) of the Financial Regulation require Member States to provide information on how EU funds under shared management are spent, in particular through the ex-post publication of beneficiaries.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1828/2006 natančneje določa obveznost pri objavah prejemnikov sredstev iz strukturnih skladov in Kohezijskega sklada.
As regards the publication of beneficiaries of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, this obligation is further specified by Commission Regulation (EC) N° 1828/2006.
Člen 7(1)(d) te uredbe določa objavo treh kategorij podatkov: a) seznama upravičencev, b) imen operacij in c) zneska javnih finančnih sredstev, dodeljenih operacijam.
Its Article 7 (1) (d) requires the publication of three categories of information: a) the list of the beneficiaries, b) the names of the operations and c) the amount of the public funding allocated to the operations.
Države članice in organi upravljanja različno razlagajo minimalne zahteve v pobudi za preglednost v Evropi.
There are many differences between Member States and Managing Authorities in the interpretation of these ETI minimum requirements.
Te različne razlage so odraz razlik tako v upravni zmogljivosti kot tudi v kulturnih in upravnih tradicijah in pogledih.
They reflect differences both in administrative capacities and cultural and administrative traditions and attitudes.
Različni pristopi k minimalnim zahtevam v pobudi za preglednost v Evropi ali njene različne razlage so možne zaradi razmeroma ohlapnega pravnega okvira za zahtevo o objavi podatkov o prejemnikih.
The different approaches to or interpretations of the ETI minimum requirements are made possible by the relatively loose legal framework enshrining the obligation of publishing data about beneficiaries.
Zlasti nejasna je opredelitev prejemnikov in znesek iz javnih sredstev, ki ga prejme prejemnik in ga je treba objaviti (namenjeni zneski proti dejansko plačanim zneskom).
In particular, there is uncertainty about the definition of beneficiaries and the amount of public funding paid to beneficiary to be published (committed amounts vs. amounts effectively paid).
Komisija se omejuje na predlaganje skupnega okvirnega standarda za objavo podatkov ter na to, da javnosti EU na spletni strani GD za regionalno politiko zagotavlja povezave na elektronske naslove držav članic, kjer so objavljeni zahtevani podatki o prejemnikih Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijskega sklada.
The Commission limits its role to proposing a common indicative standard for the publication of data and providing the EU public, through its DG REGIO website, with links to Member States’ electronic addresses where the requested data on ERDF and Cohesion Fund beneficiaries are published.
Z navedenima skladoma v „skupnem upravljanju“so za te povezave in njihovo vsebino v celoti odgovorne države članice, osnova pa so podatki, ki jih posredujejo organi upravljanja.
With the afore-mentioned Funds implemented under ‘shared management’, these links and their content is the sole responsibility of the Member States and is based on information provided by the Managing Authorities.
Zaradi različne predstavitve podatkov in pogojev za dostop do njih celostna primerjava na ravni EU ni mogoča.
The variability in the presentation and in the conditions of access to data does not allow a complete comparison at EU level.
Vse države članice sicer objavljajo vsaj minimalne zahteve (čeprav nekateri programi teritorialnega sodelovanja ne ustrezajo vsem zahtevam), nekatere med njimi pa objavljajo še dodatne informacije (npr. cilje projektov, ciljne skupine, če gre za Evropske strukturne sklade, itn.), česar sedanji pravni okvir ne zahteva.
While no Member State publishes less than the minimum requirements (although some territorial cooperation programmes do not fully comply), other Member States choose to publish additional information (e.g. objectives of the projects, target groups in case of ESF etc.), but this is not a requirement prescribed in the current legal framework.
PREGLEDNOST ZASNOVE PROGRAMOV IN IZVAJANJE
TRANSPARENCY OF PROGRAMME DESIGN AND DELIVERY
1) Skupno upravljanje
1) Shared management
Člen 69 Uredbe Sveta št. 1083/2006 določa, da „[D]ržava članica in organ upravljanja za operativni program zagotovita in objavita podatke o aktivnostih in sofinanciranih programih.
Article 69 of Council Regulation N° 1083/2006 states that the “Member State and the Managing Authority for the Operational Programme shall provide information on and publicize operations and co-financed programmes.
Informacije so naslovljene na državljane Evropske unije in upravičence, z namenom poudariti vlogo Skupnosti in poskrbeti za preglednost pomoči iz skladov.“
The information shall be addressed to European Union citizens and beneficiaries with the aim of highlighting the role of the Community and ensure that assistance from the Funds is transparent”.
V oddelku Informacije in javnost v Uredbi Komisije št. 1828/2006 so podrobno opredeljeni vidiki o zahtevanem obveščanju javnosti.
The information and publicity section of Commission Regulation N° 1828/2006 defines the detailed aspects of publicity requirements.