natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V teh dokumentih politike je bil velik poudarek na vlogi, ki naj bi jo imela teritorialna kohezija pri zagotavljanju usklajenega in trajnostnega razvoja po vsej Uniji.
These policy documents placed great emphasis on the role that territorial cohesion would be called to play in ensuring a harmonious, sustainable development across the Union.
Parlament se je v svojem poročilu o spremljanju izvajanja Teritorialne agende in Leipziške listine (poročevalka Gisela Kallenbach) pozitivno odzval na ta pristop ter ponovil svojo zahtevo po jasni opredelitvi teritorialne kohezije v nastajajoči zeleni knjigi na to temo.
The European Parliament responded positively to this approach in its report on the "Follow-up of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter" (rapporteur: Gisela Kallenbach), reiterating its request for a clear definition of territorial cohesion in the forthcoming Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion.
Potek razprave o prihodnosti kohezijske politike
State of the debate on the future of cohesion policy
Izidi javnega posvetovanja o prihodnosti evropske kohezijske politike so predstavljeni v petem poročilu o napredku na področju ekonomske in socialne kohezije, sestavljenem iz dveh delov.
The results of the public consultation on the future of EU cohesion policy are presented in the Fifth Progress Report on economic and social cohesion.
Med njimi sta zavrnitev vseh poskusov ponovne nacionalizacije ter zaveza o enotni politiki Skupnosti, ki bi morala biti ustrezna tudi za obravnavanje izzivov, kot so globalizacija ter podnebne in demografske spremembe.
Those include the rejection of any attempt for re-nationalisation and the commitment to a single Community policy, which should also be in a position to address challenges like globalisation, climate and demographic change.
Vsebina zelene knjige Komisije
Content of the Commission's Green Paper
Evropska komisija je 6. oktobra 2008 končno sprejela zeleno knjigo o teritorialni koheziji z naslovom "Teritorialna raznolikost kot prednost".
The European Commission finally adopted the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion on 6 October 2008 with the title "Turning Territorial Diversity into strength".
V njej teritorialna kohezija ni opredeljena, vsebuje pa poziv k obsežnemu posvetovanju z regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, združenji, nevladnimi organizacijami in civilno družbo za poglobitev skupnega razumevanja tega novega koncepta in njegovega pomena za prihodnjo regionalno politiko EU.
The paper does not provide a definition of "territorial cohesion"; instead, it launches a wide consultation with regional, local authorities, associations, NGOs, civil society aimed at furthering the shared understanding of this new concept and its implications for future EU regional policy.
V ta namen je v njej naveden seznam konkretnih vprašanj o različnih vidikih, vključno z opredelitvijo.
To do this, it provides a list of concrete questions that cover different aspects including a definition.
Javno posvetovanje bo potekalo do konca februarja 2009.
This public consultation will be open till the end of February 2009.
Po zeleni knjigi je cilj teritorialne kohezije zagotavljanje usklajenega razvoja vseh ozemelj Evropske unije ter omogočanje državljanom, da kar najbolje izkoristijo njihove naravne danosti.
According to the Green Paper, territorial cohesion is about ensuring the harmonious development of all EU territories, and about making sure that their citizens are able to make the most of the inherent features of these territories.
V njej je navedeno, da je treba raznolikost pretvoriti v sredstvo ter konkurenčno prednost, ki bo pripomogla k trajnostnemu razvoju vse EU.
The Green Paper suggests that diversity should actually be transformed into an asset and competitive advantage that contributes to the sustainable development of the entire EU.
Glavni izziv je torej ozemljem pomagati, da bodo kar najbolje izkoristila svoje prednosti.
The main challenge is thus to help territories make the best use of their assets.
Zaradi tega je v zeleni knjigi izražena potrditev, da sta za učinkovite rešitve potrebna celovit pristop in sodelovanje med različnimi organi in zainteresiranimi stranmi, poleg tega pa je posebej omenjeno, da je za večjo prožnost kohezijske politike in njeno večjo zmožnost prilagajanja najustreznejši ravni potrebnega posredovanja potrebno boljše upravljanje.
For that purpose, the Green Paper acknowledges that effective solutions often require an integrated approach and cooperation between the different authorities and stakeholders involved.
V zeleni knjigi je poudarjeno, da je treba omogočiti uravnotežen razvoj mest in podeželja, omenjena pa so tudi načini za preprečevanje izseljevanje prebivalstva s podeželja ter širjenja mest.
It also makes special reference to the need for improved governance of cohesion policy in order to make it more flexible and capable of adapting to the most appropriate scale of intervention needed.
Podrobneje so opisani trije ključni koncepti, na podlagi katerih je treba oblikovati posebne ukrepe politike – koncentracija, povezovanje in sodelovanje.
It elaborates on three key concepts, on the basis of which specific policy actions need to be developed: concentration, connection and cooperation :
v Koncentracija prinaša prednosti, kot sta višja produktivnost in ustvarjalnost, ima pa tudi negativne učinke, zlasti v smislu okoljskih stroškov, zastojev, cen zemljišč in socialne izključenosti.
v Concentration brings advantages such as higher productivity and creativity, but also has negative effects especially in terms of environmental costs, congestion, land prices and social exclusion.
Namen teritorialne kohezije je izkoristiti prednosti, ki izhajajo iz tega, obenem pa tudi preprečevati prekomerno koncentracijo rasti in omogočati lažji dostop do vse večjih koristi strnjenih naselij na vseh ozemljih.
Thus, territorial cohesion is about building on gains stemming from concentration, but also avoiding excessive concentrations of growth and facilitating the access to the increasing returns of agglomeration in all territories.
v Pri povezovanju je poudarek na potrebi po prehodu v povezano Evropo s hitrim in učinkovitim dostopom do trgov, storitev in ljudi.
v Connection highlights the need to move toward an integrated Europe which offers fast and efficient access to markets, services and people.
To zajema transport, pa tudi infrastrukturo, ki je osnova za učinkovito delovanje enotnega trga – na primer infrastrukturo za omogočanje dostopa do zdravstva in izobraževanja, širokopasovnega interneta ali energetskih omrežij.
This includes transport, but also infrastructures underlying the effective functioning of the Single Market - such as those guaranteeing access to health and education, to broadband internet or to energy networks.
Vse te povezave so po Uniji še vedno neenakomerno razporejene.
All these connections remain unevenly distributed across the Union today.
v Sodelovanje je bilo vedno pomemben steber kohezijske politike.
v Cooperation has always been an important pillar for cohesion policy.
V zeleni knjigi je navedeno, da je treba v zvezi s tem narediti še veliko več, da bi obravnavali čezmejna vprašanja, ki segajo od dnevnih migracij do okolja.
The Green Paper argues that even more needs to be done in that respect, in order to address issues that are cross-border by nature and range from commuting to environment.
Sodelovanje bi moralo potekati na več ravneh, pritegniti pa bi bilo treba tudi nove partnerje.
This cooperation should occur at many levels and involve new partners.
Komisija je v zeleni knjigi ugotovila tudi, da se tri vrste regij s posebnimi geografskimi značilnostmi (gore, otoki in redko naseljena območja) soočajo s posebnimi razvojnimi izzivi, ter preverila, ali so potrebni posebni ukrepi politike, da bi jih premagali.
The Commission also acknowledges the particular development challenges that three types of regions with specific geographical features (mountains, islands, sparsely populated areas) face, and looks at whether special policy measures are required in order to offset these problems.
Nazadnje je opozorila na številne sektorske politike EU z velikim teritorialnim vplivom (npr. promet, energijo, prvi steber skupne kmetijske politike, zaposlovanje, okolje) ter poudarila, da je treba med njimi vzpostaviti sinergijo.
Finally, the Commission highlights a number of sectoral EU policies, which have a strong territorial impact (e.g. transport, energy, first pillar of CAP, employment, environmental), pointing to the importance of creating synergies between them.
Splošne opombe poročevalca
General remarks by the rapporteur
· Sprejetje zelene knjige : poročevalec pozdravlja sprejetje zelene knjige o teritorialni koheziji, saj ustreza zahtevi, pri kateri je Evropski parlament dolgo vztrajal.
· Adoption of a Green Paper : The rapporteur welcomes the adoption of the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, as it responds to a long-standing demand of the European Parliament.
Čeprav lizbonska pogodba še ni bila ratificirana in zaradi tega teritorialna kohezija še nima uradne pogodbene podlage, vsebuje zelena knjiga prvo analizo tega koncepta, ki bo skupaj z ekonomsko in socialno kohezijo bistvena prednostna naloga Unije.
Despite the fact that the Lisbon Treaty is not yet ratified and, therefore, “territorial cohesion” does not currently have a formal Treaty basis, this Green Paper provides for a first analysis of this concept that will be a key priority for the Union, alongside economic and social cohesion.
Poudariti je treba, da Evropski parlament pričakuje jasno opredelitev pojma teritorialne kohezije na podlagi javnega posvetovanja, pri katerem bo dosežen splošen dogovor, ki ga bodo podprle in razumele vse zainteresirane strani s področja regionalne politike.
It should be stressed that the European Parliament expected a clear definition of territorial cohesion to result from the public consultation, which will be commonly agreed, shared and understood by all stakeholders in the field of regional policy.
· Javno posvetovanje : v zvezi s tem poročevalec pozdravlja začetek javnih posvetovanj o teritorialni koheziji.
· Public consultation : In that sense, the rapporteur welcomes the launching of a public consultation on territorial cohesion.
· V pričakovanju objave bele knjige : poročevalec meni, da bi moral Evropski parlament po končanem posvetovanju odločno zahtevati objavo bele knjige o teritorialni koheziji.
· Awaiting the publication of a White Paper : The rapporteur believes that the European Parliament should be firm in demanding the publication of a White Paper on Territorial Cohesion, following the end of the consultation process.
Meni tudi, da bi z objavo bele knjige omogočili pretvorbo pojma teritorialne kohezije v konkretne določbe, ki bi jih bilo treba uvesti z naslednjim zakonodajnim svežnjem o strukturnih skladih za programsko obdobje po letu 2013.
The rapporteur also considers that the publication of a White Paper could only pave the way for translating "territorial cohesion" into concrete provisions, which should be introduced in the next legislative package on Structural Funds for the post-2013 programming period.
· Finančni vidiki : poročevalec se strinja, da je treba iz potekajoče razprave izvzeti vse omembe proračunskih in finančnih posledic.
· Financial aspects : The rapporteur agrees with excluding all references to budgetary and financial implications of territorial cohesion from the current debate.
Meni namreč, da bi moralo biti stališče Evropskega parlamenta omejeno na politične vidike novega cilja ter kasneje razmislimo, ali, kako in koliko bi ta novi koncept vplival na proračun EU za obdobje po letu 2013.
He consideres that the position by the European Parliament should rather confine to the political aspects of this new objective and to reflect at a later stage on whether, how or to what extent this new concept might affect the EU budget for the post-2013 period.
Analiza novega koncepta : poročevalec meni, da je teritorialna kohezija poseben koncept, ki bi moral ekonomski in socialni koheziji dati oprijemljivo dodano vrednost.
Analysing the new concept : The rapporteur believes that territorial cohesion is a distinct concept that should provide tangible added value to economic and social cohesion.
S sedanjo razpravo ne bi smeli poskušati le določiti dodane vrednosti teritorialne kohezije ter konkretnih koristi, ki jih lahko evropski državljani pričakujejo od njenega izvajanja na terenu, temveč bi morali tudi obravnavati, kako bo ta koncept vključen v prihodnjo regionalno politiko EU.
The current debate should not only attempt to determine the added value of territorial cohesion, and the concrete benefits that European citizens are expected to derive from its implementation on the ground, but also to consider how this concept will be mainstreamed into future EU regional policy.
Zavračanje asimetričnega razvoja Evrope : poročevalec meni, da bi se s skladnim razvojem Unije povečala konkurenčna prednost njenega gospodarstva.
Rejecting the prospect of an asymmetric Europe : The rapporteur feels that the harmonious development of the Union will effectively contribute to raising the competitive advantage of the EU economy.
Zato se lahko teritorialna kohezija razlaga le kot horizontalen koncept, ki podpira razvoj Unije kot celote.
Therefore, territorial cohesion can only be interpreted as a horizontal concept that underpins the development of the Union as a whole.
Izziv je, kako se osredotočiti na učinkovitejša sredstva za dosego tega cilja.
The challenge is to focus on more efficient instruments that can achieve this goal.
Pri tem je posebej pomembno delo Evropskega omrežja za opazovanje prostorskega razvoja, saj poskuša predstaviti posledice različnih razvojnih modelov na teritorialni razvoj Evropske unije.
The work of the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) is particularly important to that effect, as it attempts to present the implications of different development models on the territorial development of the EU.
To delo bi moralo privesti tudi do razčlembe dodatnih kvalitativnih kazalnikov za obravnavanje ozemeljskih posebnosti ter podpirati oblikovanje in izvajanje ustreznih politik na terenu.
This work should also lead to the elaboration of additional qualitative indicators to address the territorial specificities and support the design and implementation of the corresponding policies on the ground;
Širitev koristi po vsej Uniji : posebej zanimiva je zamisel o ustanovitvi centrov odličnosti po vsej Uniji, ki so izrednega pomena za gospodarski uspeh, znanstvena odkritja, tehnološke inovacije in delovna mesta.
Transfer benefits across the Union : This idea becomes particularly salient with regard to the creation of excellence centres across the Union that are vital to economic success, scientific discovery, technological innovation and jobs.
Spodbuditi je treba komunikacijo in izmenjavo znanja med temi centri, grozdi za raziskave in inovacije ter okoliškimi regijami.
It is important to stimulate more interaction and knowledge transfer between the centres and clusters of research and innovation and their surrounding regions.
Ti uspešni centri bi morali zagotavljati koristi, ki bi se enakomerno porazdelile po ozemlju EU, da bi se čim bolj povečal učinek naložb.
Such booming centres should provide benefits that are distributed evenly across the EU territory, in order o maximise the effect of the investments made.
Čim večji izkoristek potenciala posamezne regije : za Evropsko unijo ni enega samega modela razvoja, ki bi enako ustrezal vsem regijam.
Making the most of the potential of each region : There is no "one-size-fits-all development" model for the European Union, which would work equally well for all its regions.
Raznolikost Unije je pravzaprav njena prednost.
The diversity of the Union is actually its strength.
Ugotoviti je treba prednosti vseh evropskih regij in jih izkoristiti, da bi povečali njihovo konkurenčnost ter zagotovili rast in blaginjo.
It is important to determine the assets of each European region and build on those, in order to increase their competitiveness and guarantee growth and prosperity.
V zvezi s tem je po mnenju poročevalca zelo pomemben prispevek nekdanjega finskega predsednika vlade Eska Ahoja v članku, ki ga je nedavno objavil časnik Financial Times (16. julija 2008).
The rapporteur considers very important in that respect the contribution of former Finnish Prime Minister Esko Aho in a recent article he published in the Financial Times (published on 16/07/2008).
Avtor meni, da bi se morala Evropska unija osredotočiti na oblikovanje grozdov, podobnih Silicijevi dolini, na vsem svojem ozemlju.
Mr Aho argues that the European Union needs to focus on creating "Silicon Valley" type of clusters across the Union.
Bistveno je, da se sredstva namenijo redkim obstoječim grozdom, namesto da bi jih raztresli po dolgem in počez z omejenimi možnostmi uspeha.
It is crucial to focus resources to a few existing clusters, rather than only scattering the money far and wide, with limited chances of success.
Z drugimi besedami, vsaka regija nima potenciala ali sredstev, da bi postala center odličnosti; in to ni cilj, ki bi ga morali poskušati doseči.
In other words, not every region has the potential or the resources to become a centre of excellence; this is not the objective that we should try to achieve.
Evropska unija bi morala glede tega omejiti svoj pristop.
EU should limit its approach in that respect.
Krepitev cilja evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja : neizpodbitna evropska dodana vrednost tega cilja je že bila nesporno dokazana.
Enhancing the European Territorial Cooperation Objective : The undeniable European added-value of this objective has already been proven beyond any doubt.
Še en dober znak za prihodnji razvoj tega cilja politike je neposredna udeležba regionalnih in lokalnih organov pri načrtovanju in izvajanju ustreznih programov čezmejnega, nadnacionalnega in medregijskega sodelovanja.
The direct involvement of regional and local authorities in the planning and implementation of the relevant programmes of cross-border, trans-national and interregional cooperation gives another positive sign to the future development of this policy objective.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba poudariti tudi pomembnost čezmejne razsežnosti ter ustreznih operativnih programov evropske sosedske politike.
The importance of the cross-border dimension and the relevant operational programmes of the European Neighbourhood Policy should also be highlighted in that respect.
Za regionalno politiko EU je to zgodba o uspehu in v naslednjem programskem obdobju bi jo bilo treba bistveno okrepiti.
This is a success story for the EU regional policy and it should be significantly boosted for the coming programming period.
Regije s posebnimi geografskimi značilnostmi : v zeleni knjigi o teritorialni koheziji so navedeni posebni razvojni cilji predvsem v treh vrstah regij: gorskih, otoških in redko poseljenih.
Regions with specific geographical features : The Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion acknowledges the particular development challenges especially for three types of region: mountainous regions, island regions and sparsely populated regions.
Evropski parlament je že večkrat pozval, da je treba pripraviti celovito strategijo, s katero bodo lahko te regije premagale težke in trajne naravne in demografske ovire.
The European Parliament has long called for a comprehensive strategy that would enable these regions to offset their severe and permanent natural and demographic handicaps.
Njihovemu razvoju je treba nameniti posebno pozornost, zato da bi zagotovili usklajen razvoj Unije ter dosegli teritorialno kohezijo.
Therefore, special consideration should be given to the development of those regions, in order to ensure precisely a harmonious development for the Union and achieve "territorial cohesion".
Vendar bi želel poročevalec ob tem poudariti, da teritorialna kohezija ostaja horizontalen koncept, ki se uporablja za vse regije EU in katerega ni mogoče razlagati kot novo politiko za regije z geografskimi posebnostmi.
However, the rapporteur stresses that territorial cohesion remains a horizontal concept that concerns all EU regions; it cannot be interpreted as a new policy for regions with specific geographical features.
Teritorialni vpliv sektorskih politik Skupnosti : poročevalec je razočaran, ker je prav ta del zelene knjige omejen na naštevanje politik EU z velikim teritorialnim vplivom, pri čemer pa teritorialna kohezija ni navedena kot glavni cilj ali osnovni pogoj za njihov razvoj.
Territorial impact of sectoral Community Policies : The rapporteur is disappointed that this specific section of the Green Paper is confined in listing the EU policies that have a strong territorial impact, without, however, placing territorial cohesion as a priority objective or a precondition for the development of these policies.
Evropski parlament je že večkrat izrazil podporo celovitemu pristopu vseh ukrepov in politik EU na terenu.
The European Parliament has on a number of occasions supported the need for an integrated approach of all EU actions and policies on the ground.
Z vidika politike lahko utemeljujemo, da ta zamisel v celoti sovpada s potrebo po usklajevanju teritorialnega vpliva vseh sektorskih politik skupnosti na posameznem ozemlju.
In policy terms, it can be argued that this idea corresponds entirely to the need of coordinating the territorial impact of all sectoral community policies on a given territory.
Obenem pa je treba upoštevati, da Evropski parlament s poudarjanjem teritorialne razsežnosti drugih sektorskih politik EU ne želi zmanjšati pomena in neodvisnosti regionalne politike EU.
At the same time, however, the following observation needs to be made: by putting the accent on the territorial dimension of other sectoral EU policies, the European Parliament does not attempt to diminish the importance and autonomy of EU regional policy.
Ravno nasprotno, cilj celovitega pristopa je kar najbolj povečati učinek strukturnih posegov na terenu v korist evropskih državljanov.
On the contrary, the aim of an integrated approach is to maximise the effect of structural interventions on the ground and for the benefit of European citizens.
Teritorialno upravljanje : v zeleni knjigi je navedeno, da je za uspešno izvajanje kohezijske politike v prihodnje bistveno, da se izboljša teritorialno upravljanje.
Territorial governance : The Green Paper looks at an improved territorial governance as the key for the successful future implementation of cohesion policy.
Na podlagi sklepov iz poročila o Upravljanju in partnerstvu na nacionalni in regionalni ravni ter osnovi za projekte na področju regionalne politike, ki ga je 18. septembra 2008 sprejel Evropski parlament (poročevalec Jean Marie Beaupuy), poročevalec opozarja, da je treba spodbujati sistem upravljanja na več ravneh ter določiti ustrezno teritorialno raven, na kateri bi bili ukrepi učinkovitejši na različnih stopnjah načrtovanja in izvajanja programov.
Drawing from the conclusions of the report on "Governance and partnership at national and regional levels and a basis for projects in the field of regional policy" (rapporteur: Jean Marie Beaupuy), adopted by the EP on 18 September 2008, the rapporteur raises the need to promote a system of multi-level governance and to determine the appropriate territorial level to which intervention would be more effective at the different stages of programme planning and implementation.
Seveda je treba ustrezno upoštevati tudi pomen oblikovanja novih teritorialnih partnerstev, ki morajo biti v središču vseh zadevnih analiz zelene knjige.
Due account being also made to the importance of creating new territorial partnerships, which must be at the focus of all relevant analyses on the Green Paper.
Regije v prehodnem obdobju : poročevalec ugotavlja, da je Komisija v petem poročilu o napredku prvič izrecno omenila regije v prehodnem obdobju , ki so nekje vmes med konvergenčnimi regijami in regijami s ciljem regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja.
Transition regions : The rapporteur notes that the Commission made for the first time in the 5 th Progress Report a specific reference to "Transition Regions" , which are situated between "Convergence Regions" and "Competitiveness and Employment Regions".