natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(20) Načela preglednosti, nediskriminatornosti in sorazmernosti iz Direktive 97/67/ES se še naprej uporabljajo pri vseh mehanizmih financiranja in vseh načinih izračunavanja neto stroškov univerzalne storitve .
(20) The principles of transparency, non-discrimination and proportionality contained in Directive 97/67/EC must continue to be applied to any financing mechanism and any method of calculating the net cost of the universal service.
Vse odločitve na tem področju morajo temeljiti na preglednih, nepristranskih in preverljivih merilih.
Any decision in this area must be based on transparent, objective and verifiable criteria.
Načela preglednosti, nediskriminatornosti in sorazmernosti je treba izvajati ne le pri uporabi mehanizmov financiranja univerzalnih storitev, ampak tudi pri izračunavanju neto stroškov univerzalne storitve.
It is necessary to apply the principles of transparency, non-discrimination and proportionality not only to the application of financing mechanisms of universal services, but also to the calculation of the net costs of universal services.
Skupaj z bolj jasnimi sedanjimi načini izračunavanja bo to sčasoma pripeljalo do dodatne pravne varnosti na nacionalnih trgih, ne da bi povzročilo zapoznelo izvajanje in prenos direktive, in bo tako pripomoglo k ustvarjanju notranjega trga za poštne storitve.
This, combined with further clarification on the actual methods of calculating, will eventually lead to further legal certainty in national markets, without delaying the implementation and transposition of the Directive, and thus assisting in the creation of a internal market for postal services.
(22) V okolju, kjer storitve na področju univerzalne storitve izvaja več poštnih podjetij, je primerno zahtevati, da vse države članice z namenom spodbujanja učinkovite konkurence ocenijo, ali je nekatere elemente poštne infrastrukture ali določene storitve, ki jih na splošno zagotavljajo izvajalci univerzalne storitve, treba narediti dostopne drugim operaterjem, ki nudijo podobne storitve, in/ali varujejo uporabnike z zagotavljanjem splošne kakovosti poštne storitve.
(22) In an environment where several postal undertakings provide services within the universal service area, it is appropriate to require all Member States to assess whether some elements of the postal infrastructure or certain services generally provided by universal service providers should be made accessible to other operators providing similar services, in order to promote effective competition, and/or protect users by ensuring the overall quality of the postal service.
Izraz "uporabniki" zajema tudi "potrošnike", zato bi uporaba obeh izrazov lahko pripeljala do napačnega razumevanja direktive.
The term 'users' includes also 'consumers', therefore using both terms could lead to misinterpretation of the Directive.
(25a) Potem, ko bo od nacionalnih regulativnih organov dobila zadosti podatkov o nacionalnih poštnih trgih, bi morala Komisija podati smernice za izračunavanje neto stroškov univerzalne storitve in uporabo predlaganega(-ih) mehanizma(-ov) financiranja, predvsem kar zadeva pravila o konkurenci in državni pomoči.
(25a) The Commission, after receiving sufficient information on the national postal markets from the national regulatory authorities, should issue guidance on the calculation of the net costs of universal services and on the application of the proposed financing mechanism(s), notably with regard to competition rules and State aid rules.
Trenutni predlog Komisije državam članicam ne nudi zadosti smernic za izračunavanje neto stroškov univerzalne storitve in mehanizme financiranja univerzalnih storitev.
The Commission proposal as it currently stands does not provide sufficient guidelines to Member States, either on the calculation of the universal services' net costs, or on the financing mechanisms of the universal services.
To lahko pripelje do pravne negotovosti na nacionalnih trgih in povzroči zapoznelo izvajanje in prenos direktive in tako neposredno vpliva na izoblikovanje notranjega trga za poštne storitve.
This may lead to legal uncertainty in national markets delaying the implementation and transposition of the Directive, and thus have a direct effect on the creation of an internal market for postal services.
(26 a) Da bi Komisija izboljšala pravno varnost in olajšala naložbene odločitve vseh poštnih operaterjev, bi morala z objavo posebne razlage ali na kak drug način podati smernice glede izvajanja pravil o konkurenci in državni pomoči v poštnem sektorju ter smernice o načelih razporeditve stroškov iz člena 14(3).
(26 a) In order to increase legal ce r tainty and to facilitate the investment decisions of all postal operators, the Commission should issue guidance on the application of the competition rules and State aid rules in the postal sector by way of an interpret a tive communication or other means, and also guidance on the cost allocation principles set out in Article 14(3).
Sodelovanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi pri nadaljnjem razvoju standardov in smernic na tem področju bi moralo prispevati k usklajeni uporabi teh pravil.
Moreover, cooperation between national regulatory authorities in continuing to d e velop benchmarks and guidelines in this area, should contribute to the harmonised applic a tion of these rules.
Po pogodbi o ES je spremljanje državne pomoči in navzkrižnih subvencij v izključni pristojnosti Evropske komisije.
aid and cross-subsidisation under the EC Treaty is the exclusive competence of the European Commission.
Dovoliti državam članicam, da odločajo o spremljanju navzkrižnih subvencij je torej v nasprotju z določili pogodbe.
Allowing Member States to decide how to monitor cross-subsidisation is contrary to the system e s tablished by the Treaty.
Vseeno na trgu poštnih storitev obstaja jasna potreba po smernicah Komisije o tem, kako v poštnem sektorju najbolje uporabljati pravila o konkurenci (vključno s pravili o državni pomoči).
However, there is a clear need in the market for guidance from the Commission on how best to apply the competition rules (including the rules on State aid) to the postal sector.
Komisija bi zato morala sprejeti obvestilo glede uporabe pravil o konkurenci (vključno s pravili o državni pomoči) v poštnem sektorju.
The Commission should therefore adopt a notice on the application of the competition rules (including the rules on State aid) to the postal sector.
Glej predlog spremembe k členu 23.
See the proposed amendment of Art i cle 23.
V skladu z obstoječimi predpisi na drugih področjih in z namenom izboljšanja varstva potrošnikov je primerno, da se minimalna načela glede pritožbenih postopkov razširijo in se ne uporabljajo samo za izvajalca(-e) univerzalne storitve.
(27) In line with existing rules in other service areas and in order to enhance consumer protection, it is appropriate to extend the application of minimum principles concerning complaint procedures beyond universal service providers.
Zaradi izvedljivosti postopka izvensodne poravnave mora biti dokazno breme obrnjeno, tako da morajo izvajalci poštnih storitev dokazati, da so svoje obveznosti izpolnili v celoti.
If the out-of-court settlement procedure is to be feasible, the burden of proof must be reversed, so that it is the postal service providers that have to prove that they have fully met their obligations.
(32) Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo, če je to potrebno , pri izvajanju svojih nalog po tej direktivi usklajevati svoje dejavnosti z regulativnimi organi drugih držav članic in s Komisijo.
(32) National regulatory authorities should , where necessary , coordinate their actions with the regulatory bodies of other Member States and with the Commission in carrying out their tasks under this Directive.
(32) Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo pri izvajanju svojih nalog po tej direktivi izmenjavati najboljše prakse in usklajevati svoje dejavnosti z regulativnimi organi drugih držav članic in s Komisijo.
(32) National regulatory authorities should exchange best practices and coordinate their actions with the regulatory bodies of other Member States and with the Commission in carrying out their tasks under this Directive.
V svojem rednem poročilu o izvajanju te direktive, ki ga pripravi za Evropski parlament in Svet, naj bi Komisija preučila potrebo po nadaljnjem razvoju operativnega evropskega regulativnega organa za poštne storitve.
The Commission, in its regular report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Directive, should examine the necessity of further developing an operational European regulatory authority for postal services.
Komisija bi morala preučiti pristojnosti in delovanje evropskega regulativnega organa, ki bi na eni strani deloval kot platforma za nacionalne regulativne organe pri izmenjavi ukrepov upravnega sodelovanja in meril uspešnosti, na drugi pa kot svetovalni organ Evropske komisije za tehnična vprašanja in vprašanja boljšega izvajanja in nadzora nad skladnostjo z zakonodajo Skupnosti na nacionalni ravni.
The Commission should examine the competence and functioning of a European regulatory authority, as a platform for national regulatory authorities to exchange measures of administrative cooperation and benchmarking and as the European Commission's advisory body on technical issues and the better implementation and monitoring of compliance to Community legislation at the national level.
Podobni dogovori so bili sprejeti v primeru telekomunikacijskega, finančnega in energetskega sektorja.
Similar arrangements have been made in the case of the telecoms, financial and energy sectors.
(33) Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo za učinkovito izvajanje svojih nalog pridobiti informacije od udeležencev na trgu.
(33) National regulatory authorities need to gather information from market players in order to carry out their tasks effectively.
Zahteve za informacije naj bodo sorazmerne in naj ne predstavljajo prevelikega bremena za podjetja.
Requests for information should be proportionate and not impose an undue burden on undertakings.
Take informacije bo morda morala zbirati tudi Komisija, da bi tako lahko izpolnila svoje obveznosti po zakonodaji Skupnosti.
Such information may also need to be gathered by the Commission, to allow it to fulfil its obligations under Community Law.
Kjer je to primerno, nacionalni regulativni organi pri zahtevah za informacije upoštevajo zaupen značaj teh informacij, ki jih uporabijo zgolj za opravljanje svojih nalog.
The request of information must, where appropriate, take place within the limits of confidentiality and the exact exercise by national regulatory authorities of their tasks.
V nasprotnem primeru bi se lahko informacije poštnih operaterjev uporabile na način, ki bi oviral pošteno konkurenco na notranjem trgu.
Otherwise, information provided from postal operators may be used in a manner hampering fair competition within an internal market.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (- A) (novo) Člen 2, točka 2) (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT (- A) (new) Article 2, point 2) (Directive 97/67/EC)
(- a) točka 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
-a ) point 2 is replaced by the following text:
„(2) "poštno omrežje izvajalca(-ev) univerzalne storitve: sistem organizacije in vseh vrst sredstev, ki jih uporablja(-jo) izvajalec(-i) univerzalne storitve, še zlasti v naslednje namene:
"2) 'postal network of the universal service provider(s)': the system of organisation and resources of all kinds used by the universal service provider(s) for the purposes in particular of:
– za sprejem poštnih pošiljk, ki spadajo v obveznost univerzalne storitve s točk dostopa po vsem ozemlju, za katerega je(so) bil(-i) izvajalec(-i) univerzalne storitve imenovan(-i),
— the clearance of postal items covered by a universal service obligation from access points throughout the territory for which the universal service provider(s) have been appointed
– za prenos teh pošiljk in ravnanje z njimi od točk dostopa do dostavnega centra,
— the routing and handling of those items from the postal network access point to the distribution centre,
– dostavo na naslove, označene na pošiljkah;“
— distribution to the addresses shown on items;"
(Rahlo dopolnjeno besedilo iz direktive 97/67/ES)
(Same wording as that of Directive 97/67/EC, with some additions)
Ker se zagotavljanje različnih elementov univerzalne storitve lahko poveri enemu ali več izvajalcem univerzalne storitve (glej člen 4 kakor je bil spremenjen v predlogu), katerih javni ali zasebni status ni pomemben, ni več smotrno govoriti o „javnem“ poštnem omrežju.
As the provision of various elements of the universal service may be entrusted to one or more service providers (see amended Article 4), who may be public or private, it makes no sense to continue to consider that a public postal network exists.
Ustrezneje je govoriti o poštnem omrežju izvajalcev univerzalne storitve.
It is more appropriate to refer to the postal network of the universal service provider(s).
Poleg tega se zdi primerno, da se v definicijo vključi možnost imenovanja več izvajalcev univerzalne storitve za pokrivanje dela nacionalnega ozemlja.
Furthermore, the possibility that several universal service providers could be appointed to cover part of the national territory should be included in this definition.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (-A A) (novo) Člen 2, točka 3) (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT (-A A) (new) Article 2, point 3) (Directive 97/67/EC)
(-aa) točka 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
- aa) Point 3 is replaced by the following text:
3. točke dostopa: fizične zmogljivosti, vključno z javnimi poštnimi nabiralniki ob javnih cestah ali v prostorih izvajalca univerzalne storitve, kjer lahko uporabniki oddajo poštne pošiljke;
3) 'access points': physical facilities, including letterboxes provided for the public, either on the public highway, or at the premises of the universal service provider(s), where postal items may be deposited with these providers;
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (A A) (novo) Člen 2, točka 7) (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT (A A) (new) Article 2, point 7) (Directive 97/67/EC)
(aa) točka 7 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
aa) Point 7 is replaced by the following text:
„7. pošiljka korespondence: pisna komunikacija, vključno z direktno pošto, v kakršnem koli fizičnem mediju, ki ga je treba prenesti in dostaviti na naslov, ki ga je navedel pošiljatelj na sami pošiljki ali na ovitku.
"7) 'Item of correspondence': a communication in written form, including direct mail, on any kind of physical medium to be conveyed and delivered at the address indicated by the sender on the item itself or on its wrapping.
Knjige, katalogi, časopisi in periodični tisk se ne štejejo kot pošiljke korespondence;“
Books, catalogues, newspapers and periodicals shall not be regarded as items of correspondence;"
Z izrecno navedbo direktne pošte je jasno nakazano, da poštni sektor priznava specifični značaj tega dela poštnega trga.
The reference to direct mail gives a clear indication that the specific nature of this sector of the postal market has been recognised in the postal sector.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (B) Člen 2, točka 8) (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT (B) Article 2, point 8) (Directive 97/67/EC)
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (C) Člen 2, točka 20 (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2, POINT (C) Article 2, point 20 (Directive 97/67/CE)
„20: storitve, zagotovljene po tarifi za en kos: poštne storitve, za katere je tarifa določena v splošnih pogojih izvajalcev univerzalne storitve za prenos posameznih poštnih pošiljk.“
20: services provided at single piece tariff: postal services for which the tariff is set in the general terms and conditions of universal service providers for the transport of individual postal items.
„20: storitve, zagotovljene po tarifi za en kos: poštne storitve, za katere je tarifa določena za sprejem, usmerjanje, prenos in dostavo posameznih poštnih pošiljk.“
20: services provided at single piece tariff: postal services for which the tariff is set for the collection, sorting, transport and delivery of individual postal items.
Gre za opredelitev koncepta storitve po tarifi za en kos ne glede na operaterja in tip dejavnosti, ki jo izvaja.
It defines the single piece tariff concept irrespective of the operator and type of activity it performs.
Člen 4, odstavek 1 (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
Article 4, paragraph 1 (Directive 97/67/EC)
Vsaka država članica za spremljanje podrobnega izvajanja storitve zadolži pristojni nacionalni regulativni organ ali organe.
Each Member State shall entrust to its designated national regulatory authority or authorities the task of monitoring the detailed provision of the service.
Kjer je to potrebno, lahko ustrezni organ za zagotavljanje univerzalne storitve uvede ukrepe v skladu s členom 9 in po posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi stranmi.
Where necessary, the relevant authority may impose provisions to guarantee the universal service according to Article 9, in consultation with interested parties.
Zagotavljanje univerzalne storitve je ključnega pomena.
Guaranteeing the provision of universal services is crucial.
Zato je pomembno, da nacionalni regulativni organi niso pristojni le za spremljanje poštnega trga, ampak tudi za samo zagotavljanje univerzalne storitve, kar lahko dosežejo z ukrepi, ki bodo prispevali k vzpostavitvi notranjega trga za poštne storitve.
It is thus important for the national regulatory authorities to not only be responsible for the monitoring of the postal market, but also for guaranteeing the universal services' provision, by imposing provisions that will strengthen the establishment of an internal market for postal services.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 4 Člen 4, odstavek 2 (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 4 Article 4, paragraph 2 (Directive 97/67/EC)
Zlasti države članice sprejmejo ukrepe za jamstvo, da pogoji, pod katerimi se zagotavljajo univerzalne storitve, temeljijo na načelih nepristranskosti, nediskriminatornosti, sorazmernosti in najmanjšega izkrivljanja trga in da je imenovanje izvajalcev univerzalne storitve časovno omejeno .
In particular Member States shall take measures to ensure that the conditions under which universal services are entrusted are based on objective, non–discriminatory, proportionate and least market distortion principles, and that the designation of undertakings as universal service providers is limited in time .
Zlasti države članice sprejmejo ukrepe za jamstvo, da pogoji, pod katerimi se zagotavljajo univerzalne storitve, temeljijo na načelih nepristranskosti, nediskriminatornosti, sorazmernosti in najmanjšega izkrivljanja trga, brez poseganja v nadaljnji obstoj univerzalne poštne storitve, ki je porok za socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo .
In particular Member States shall take measures to ensure that the conditions under which universal services are entrusted are based on objective, non–discriminatory, proportionate and least market distortion principles, without prejudice to the continuity of universal postal service, which is a guarantor of social and territorial cohesion.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo, da se univerzalna storitev razširi na celotno nacionalno ozemlje.
The Member States may require that universal service provision should extend to the whole of national territory.
Zaradi zemljepisnih pogojev v nekaterih državah članicah (gorata območja, redko poseljena podeželska območja ipd.) so regionalni javni razpisi za izvajanje univerzalne poštne storitve lahko neustrezni.
In view of the geography of certain Member States (mountain regions, sparsely populated rural areas, etc.), it may be inappropriate to issue regional calls for tender for provision of universal postal service.
Dodelitev univerzalne storitve več regionalnim operaterjem bi nedvomno vplivala na nadaljnji obstoj javne poštne storitve in njeno kakovost, ker bi pri prevozu poštnih pošiljk sodelovali različni operaterji, to pa bi zlasti vplivalo na zajamčeni čas za dostavo.
In fact, awarding universal service to several regional operators would undoubtedly affect the continuity of the public postal service and the quality of the service offered to consumers, as several different operators would be involved in transporting postal items, particularly as regards guaranteed delivery times.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 5 A (novo) Člen 5 a (novo) (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5 A (new) Article 5 a (new) (Directive 97/67/EC)
(5a) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
5a) The following article is inserted
"Člen 5 a
'Article 5 a
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da bodo na svojem ozemlju poleg storitev v okviru obveznosti univerzalne storitve za javnost odprle še dodatne storitve.
Member States may decide to make publicly available within their territory additional services to those covered under the universal service obligation.'
S tem dodatnim členom je državam članicam dana možnost, da poštnim operatorjem poleg nalog iz univerzalnih poštnih storitev dodelijo še druge naloge, kot je prevoz časopisov in naloge v zvezi z regionalnim razvojem.
Adding this article makes it possible to ensure that all Member State can assign to postal operators public service tasks other than those covered by universal postal service such as newspaper transport and regional development tasks.
Te naloge so povsem ločene od nalog v okviru univerzalne storitve, zato bi moralo biti ločeno tudi njihovo financiranje.
These tasks are independent of those required under universal service and should not be financed in the same way.
Podobna določba je bila vključena tudi v predpise o elektronski komunikaciji.
A similar provision is included in the electronic communications package.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 6 Člen 6, odstavek 1 (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 Article 6, paragraph 1 (Directive 97/67/EC)
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe za zagotovitev, da so uporabniki in podjetja, ki izvajajo poštne storitve, s strani izvajalcev univerzalne storitve redno seznanjeni z dovolj natančnimi in najnovejšimi informacijami o posameznih značilnostih ponujenih univerzalnih storitev, s posebno navedbo splošnih pogojev dostopa do teh storitev ter cen in ravni standardov kakovosti.
Member States shall take steps to ensure that users and undertakings providing postal services are regularly given sufficiently detailed and up-to-date information from the universal service providers regarding the particular features of the universal services offered, with special reference to the general conditions of access to these services as well as to prices and quality standard levels.
Člen 7, odstavek 1 (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
Article 7, paragraph 1 (Directive 97/67/EC)
Od 1. januarja 2009 države članice ne odobrijo ali ohranijo v veljavi izključnih ali posebnih pravic za oblikovanje in zagotavljanje poštnih storitev .
With effect from 1 January 2009 Member States shall not grant or maintain in force exclusive or special rights for the establishment and the provision of postal services .
Od 1. januarja 2009 države članice ne odobrijo ali ohranijo v veljavi izključnih ali posebnih pravic kot sredstva za financiranje univerzalne storitve .
With effect from 1 January 2009, Member States shall not grant or maintain in force exclusive or special rights as a means of financing the universal service .
Države članice lahko zagotavljanje univerzalnih storitev financirajo v skladu z enim ali več sredstvi ali s kombinacijo sredstev iz odstavkov 2, 3 in 4, ali v skladu s katerim drugim sredstvom, skladnim s Pogodbo ES.
Member States may finance the provision of universal services in accordance with one or more of the means or a combination thereof provided for in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, or in accordance with any other means compatible with the EC Treaty.
Predlog spremembe pojasni, zakaj se ukinejo izključne in posebne pravice.
The amendment clarifies the reason for the suppression of exclusive and special rights, which is not the establishment of postal services but the financing of the universal service.
Vzrok je financiranje univerzalne storitve in ne vzpostavitev poštnih storitev.
In addition, "postal services" is a much wider term than the term "universal services".
Novo besedilo je tako v skladu z naslovom tretjega poglavja (Financiranje univerzalne storitve) in zapisa uvodne izjave 17.
Finally, the new wording is in line with the title of Chapter 3 (Financing of universal services) and the wording used in Recital 17.