natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ambiciozen pravni instrument, ki naj temelji na načelu domneve nedolžnosti, o postopkovnih zaščitnih ukrepih v kazenskopravnem postopku, kot so pravica do „obvestila o pravicah“, pravica do pravnega nasveta, po potrebi pravica do brezplačnega pravnega nasveta pred in med sojenjem, pravica do navedbe dokazov, pravica do obveščenosti o naravi obtožbe ali razlogih za sum in sicer v jeziku, ki ga osumljenec/obtoženec razume, pravica do dostopa do vseh zadevnih dokumentov v jeziku, ki ga osumljenec/obtoženec razume, pravica do tolmača, pravica do sojenja in pravica do obrambe, zaščita osumljencev/obtožencev, ki ne razumejo postopka ali mu ne morejo slediti, minimalni standardi za pridržanje in pogoje za mladoletne osumljence/obtožence ter njihovo zaščito ter učinkoviti in dostopni mehanizmi odškodnine za posameznike;
– an ambitious legal instrument on procedural safeguards in criminal proceedings, based on the principle of presumption of innocence, such as the right to a "Letter of Rights", the right to legal advice, the right to free legal advice when necessary, both before and during the trial, the right to adduce evidence, the right to be informed in a language understandable by the suspect/defendant of the nature of and/or the reasons for the charges and /or of the grounds for suspicion , the right of access to all relevant documents in a language which the suspect/defendant understands, the right to an interpreter;, the right to a hearing and the right of defence, protection of suspects/defendants who cannot understand or follow the proceedings, minimum standards for detention, conditions and protection of juvenile suspects/defendants as well as effective and accessible mechanisms of redress for individuals;
– celovit pravni okvir, ki bo žrtvam kaznivih dejanj ponujal najširše varstvo, vključno z ustreznim nadomestilom in zaščito prič, še posebej, ko gre za zadeve, povezane z organiziranim kriminalom;
– a comprehensive legal framework offering victims of crime the widest protection, including adequate compensation and witness protection, notably in organised crime cases;
– pravni instrument o dopustnosti dokazov v kazenskih postopkih;
– a legal instrument on the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings;
– ukrepe za določitev minimalnih standardov glede pogojev v zaporih in priporu ter skupen niz pravic zapornikov v EU, ki naj med drugim vključuje pravico do komunikacije in konzularno pomoč;
– measures to fix minimum standards for prison and detention conditions and a common set of prisoners' rights in the EU, including, among others, the right of communication and consular assistance;
– ukrepe za delovanje kot glavna gonilna sila in podpornik civilne družbe in institucij pri njihovem prizadevanju za boj proti mafijskim združbam ter ukrepa s ciljem sprejetja zakonodajnega instrumenta o zaplembi finančnih sredstev in premoženja mednarodnih kriminalnih organizacij ter o njihovi uporabi za socialne namene;
– measures to act as prime mover and supporter of civil society and institutions in their efforts to combat mafias and take action with a view to the adoption of a legislative instrument on confiscation of the financial assets and property of international criminal organisations and on their re-use for social purposes,
(b) glede na to, da je načelo vzajemnega priznavanja temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, naj čim prej sprejme pravne instrumente EU, ki so še potrebni za njegovo celovito izvajanje, ter zagotovi razvoj enakovrednih standardov procesnih pravic in zbliževanje minimalnih pravil o vidikih kazenskega postopka,
(b) given that the principle of mutual recognition is the cornerstone on which judicial cooperation in criminal matters is based, adopt without delay those EU legal instruments still needed to complete its implementation, as well as ensure the development of equivalent standards for procedural rights and the approximation of minimum rules concerning aspects of criminal procedure,
(c) naj skupaj z državami članicami učinkovito izvaja načelo vzajemnega priznavanja na kazenskopravnem območju, pri čemer naj ustrezno pozornost nameni težavam in dosežkom pri izvajanju in vsakodnevni uporabi evropskega naloga za prijetje, ter zagotovi, da države članice pri uporabi tega načela spoštujejo temeljne pravice in splošna načela prava, kot jih določa člen 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
(c) effectively implement, together with the Member States, the mutual recognition principle in the area of criminal justice, giving due attention to difficulties and achievements in the implementation and daily application of the European Arrest Warrant, and making sure that in the application of the principle by the Member States they respect fundamental rights and the general principles of law as established in Article 6 of the EU Treaty,
(d) poziva države članice, naj pri izvajanju okvirnega sklepa o evropskem nalogu za prijetje uporabijo načelo sorazmernosti, ter opozarja na druge pravne instrumente, kot so zaslišanja z uporabo tehnike videokonference, ki se v nekaterih primerih lahko izkažejo za primerne ob uporabi ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov,
(d) call on the Member States to apply the proportionality principle while implementing the framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant and draws attention to other legal instruments such as hearings by videoconference which might prove to be appropriate in specific cases with appropriate safeguards;
(e) v sodelovanju z Evropskim parlamentom oceni sedanje stanje na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah v Evropski uniji, pri čemer naj upošteva tako pomanjkljivosti kot napredek,
(e) take stock, in cooperation with Parliament, of the current state of judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union, considering both shortcomings and progress,
(f) skupaj s Komisijo in Parlamentom oblikuje odbor modrecev (pravnikov), ki bi imel nalogo, da pripravi študijo o podobnostih in razlikah med sistemi kazenskega prava vseh držav članic ter predložil predloge za razvoj kazenskopravnega območja EU, ki bi uravnovesilo učinkovitost kazenskih postopkov in varovanje pravic posameznikov,
(f) establish, together with the Commission and with Parliament, a committee of wise persons (jurists) with the task of preparing a study on similarities and differences between the criminal law systems of all Member States and submit proposals for the development of an EU criminal justice area that will balance effectiveness in criminal proceedings with safeguarding individual rights,
(g) skupaj s Komisijo in Parlamentom ter v sodelovanju s pristojnimi odbori Sveta Evrope, kot je Evropska komisija za učinkovitost sodstva, in z obstoječimi evropskimi mrežami, ki delujejo na področju kazenskih zadev, oblikuje objektiven, nepristranski, pregleden, celovit, horizontalen in neprekinjen sistem spremljanja in ocenjevanja izvajanja politik EU in pravnih instrumentov na tem področju, pa tudi kakovosti in učinkovitosti, integritete in pravičnosti sodstva; sistem naj upošteva tudi raven izvajanja sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v državah članicah in naj bo zasnovan po vzoru sistema vzajemnega ocenjevanja, zmožen pa naj bo pripraviti zanesljiva poročila najmanj enkrat letno.
(g) set, together with the Commission and with Parliament, in cooperation with the relevant Council of Europe Committees, such as the CEPEJ, and with the existing European networks operating on criminal matters, an objective, impartial, transparent, comprehensive, horizontal and continuous monitoring and evaluation system of the implementation of EU policies and legal instruments in this area, as well as of quality and efficiency, integrity and fairness of justice, taking also into account the level of implementation of ECJ and ECHR case-law by Member States, modelled on the peer evaluation system and capable of producing reliable reports at least once a year.
Sistem ocenjevanja bi moral zlasti:
In particular, the evaluation system should:
- oblikovati mrežo za ocenjevanje, ki bi bila sestavljena iz politične in tehnične ravni,
- set up an evaluation network composed by both a political level and a technical level,
- opredeliti – na podlagi pregleda obstoječih sistemov ocenjevanja: prednostne naloge, področje uporabe, merila in metode, pri čemer bi se morali zavedati, da ocenjevanje ne bi smelo biti teoretično, temveč bi moralo presojati učinek politik EU na terenu in na vsakodnevno upravljanje sodstva, ter kakovost, učinkovitost, integriteto in pravičnost sodstva, pri tem pa upoštevati tudi raven izvajanja sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v državah članicah,
- identify, on the basis of a review of existing evaluation systems: priorities, scope, criteria and methods, bearing in mind that the evaluation should not be theoretical but rather should assess the impact of EU policies on the ground and on the daily management of justice as well as the quality, efficiency, integrity and fairness of justice, also taking into account the level of implementation of ECJ and ECHR case-law by Member States;
- preprečiti podvajanje obstoječih sistemov ocenjevanja ter spodbujati sinergijo z njimi,
- avoid duplication of and foster synergies with existing evaluation systems,
- uporabiti mešan pristop, ki naj bo sestavljen tako iz statističnih kot zakonodajnih informacij ter iz ocene izvajanja instrumentov EU na terenu,
- use a mixed approach composed of both statistical and legislative information and of an assessment of the application of EU instruments on the ground,
- zbirati primerljive podatke in, če je mogoče, oceniti razpoložljive podatke,
- collect comparable data and take stock, insofar as possible, of already available data,
- tesno vključiti Parlament tako na politični kot na tehnični ravni sistema ocenjevanja,
- involve Parliament closely in both the political and technical levels of the evaluation system,
(h) naj skupaj s Komisijo in Parlamentom pazljivo oceni sedanji položaj sodniškega usposabljanja v Evropski uniji, njegove slabosti in potrebe, ter sprejme takojšnje ukrepe, s katerimi bo spodbudil oblikovanje dejanske pravosodne kulture EU, z vzpostavitvijo evropske pravosodne šole za sodnike, tožilce, zagovornike in druge, ki zaposlene v sodstvu, ki bi jo morali:
(h) take stock, together with the Commission and with Parliament, of the current state of judicial training in the European Union, its weaknesses and needs, and take immediate action in order to promote the creation of a genuine EU judicial culture by creating a European Judicial School for judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers and others involved in the administration of justice, which should:
- zgraditi na temeljih obstoječe evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje, kasneje pa jo razviti v inštitut EU, ki bi bil povezan z obstoječimi agencijami, imel pa bi trdno in ustrezno strukturo, v kateri bi imele najpomembnejšo vlogo nacionalne pravosodne šole, pravosodne mreže in organizacije za pravice obrambe, sodelovati pa bi morala tudi Komisija,
- be built, starting from the existing EJTN and in the perspective of developing toward an EU Institute linked with existing agencies, with a solid and appropriate structure, within which a pre-eminent role should be given to national judicial schools and judicial networks and defence rights organisations and with the association of the Commission,
- upravljati in dodatno razvijati programe izmenjav med sodnimi organi,
- manage and further develop the exchange programme for judicial authorities,
- določiti enotne učne programe za pravosodno usposabljanje, ki bi zagotavljali, da bo evropska komponenta pomembno zastopana na različnih pravnih področjih,
- set common curricula for judicial training ensuring that the European component is present as relevant according to the different fields of law,
- ponujati začetno in nadaljevalno usposabljanje za evropske sodnike, tožilce in zagovornike na prostovoljni podlagi,
- offer, on a voluntary basis, both initial and continuous training to European judges, prosecutors and defence lawyers,
- povečati jezikovno znanje pravosodnih organov, odvetnikov in drugih vpletenih subjektov,
- strengthen linguist skills of judicial authorities, lawyers and other involved actors,
- nuditi to usposabljanje tudi državam kandidatkam in drugim državam, s katerimi ima EU sklenjene sporazume o sodelovanju in partnerstvu,
- offer such training also to candidate countries and other States with which the EU has concluded cooperation and partnership agreements,
(i) poziva države članice, naj nemudoma začnejo v celoti izvajati sklep Sveta o okrepitvi Eurojusta in spremembi sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ (5613/2008) ter spodbudijo nacionalne organe k vključitvi Eurojusta v zgodnji stopnji postopkov sodelovanja, da bi tako presegli odpor do izmenjave informacij in polnega sodelovanja, ki se je pokazal na nacionalni ravni, ter poziva Svet, Komisijo in Eurojust, naj v celoti in tesno vključijo Parlament v prihodnje dejavnosti, namenjene pravilnemu izvajanju sklepa o Eurojustu,
(i) urge Member States to fully implement without delay the Council Decision on the strengthening of Eurojust and amending Council Decision 2002/187/JHA (5613/2008) and to encourage national authorities to involve Eurojust in the early stages of the cooperation procedures, to overcome the reluctance to share information and to fully cooperate which has been shown at national level, and calls on the Council, together with the Commission and with Eurojust, to fully involve Parliament closely in the forthcoming activities with a view to the correct implementation of the Decision implementing Eurojust,
(j) pripravi načrt za izvajanje omenjenega sklepa, zlasti glede pristojnosti Eurojusta pri
(j) draw up a plan for the implementation of the above-mentioned decision, in particular with regard to Eurojust's competences on the:
- reševanju sporov o sodni pristojnosti,
- resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction,
- opravljanju preiskav ali pregonov,
- power to undertake investigations or prosecutions,
(k) sprejeti ukrepe, potrebne za vsakoletno objavo celovitega poročila o kriminalu v Evropski uniji, ki bo združevalo poročila o posebnih področjih, kot so ocena nevarnosti organiziranega kriminala (OCTA), letno poročilo Eurojusta itd.,
(k) take action with a view to the publication, every year, of a comprehensive report on crime in the EU, consolidating reports related to specific areas such as OCTA (Organised Crime Threat Assessment), the Eurojust annual report etc,
(l) poziva države članice, naj še naprej proučujejo pobudo Češke republike, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije, Slovaške republike in Kraljevine Švedske o okvirnem sklepu Sveta o preprečevanju in reševanju sporov o sodni pristojnosti v kazenskih postopkih, ki bi upošteval pravice osumljenca ali obtoženca, da je na vseh stopnjah postopka obveščen o postopku izbire kazenske jurisdikcije in vanj vključen, ter naj se na osnovi doseženega napredka med pogajanji v Svetu ponovno posvetujejo s Parlamentom,
(l) call on the Member States to continue working on the initiative of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and of the Kingdom of Sweden for a Council Framework decision on the prevention and settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings respecting the rights of the suspect or defendant to be informed and involved at all stages of the choice of the criminal jurisdiction process, and consult Parliament again on the basis of the progress achieved during negotiation in the Council
(m) naj ustrezno pozornost nameni prednostim, ki jih ponujajo nove tehnologije pri zagotavljanju visoke stopnje javne varnosti, in v celoti izkoristi možnosti interneta pri širjenju informacij, krepitvi vloge novoustanovljenega pravosodnega foruma, spodbujanju razvoja novih učnih metod (e-učenje) ter zbiranju in izmenjavi podatkov, s posodabljanjem in krepitvijo obstoječih baz podatkov, kot so na primer carinske, ki so bistvenega pomena v boju proti tihotapljenju in trgovini z ljudmi, obenem pa zagotavljajo spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in zlasti visoko stopnjo zaščite zasebnosti posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v okviru sodelovanja policijskih in pravosodnih organov v kazenskih zadevah,
(m) pay due attention to advantages offered by new technologies to ensure a high degree of public safety and to fully exploit the potential offered by the internet to disseminate information, to strengthen the role of the newly created "Justice Forum", to encourage the development of new learning methods (e-learning), and to gather and share data, updating and reinforcing existing databases such as the customs' databases, which are essentials in fighting smuggling and human trafficking, while at the same time ensuring respect for fundamental rights and notably a high level of protection of the privacy of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU ( B6‑0335/2008 )
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION ( B6‑0335/2008 )
ki ga predlaga Panayiotis Demetriou
by Panayiotis Demetriou
o razvoju kazenskopravnega območja EU
on the development of an EU criminal justice area
– ob upoštevanju členov 6, 29, 31(1) ter 34(2)(a) in (b) Pogodbe o EU, listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti členov 47, 48, 49 in 50, ter evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, zlasti členov 5, 6, 7 in 13,
– having regard to Articles 6, 29, 31(1)(c) and 34(2)(a) and (b)of the TEU, to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Articles 47, 48, 49 and 50, and to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, notably Articles 5, 6, 7 and 13,
– ker je trdno odločen, da je treba pospešiti dialog o teh zadevah z nacionalnimi parlamenti, civilno družbo in sodnimi organi,
– firmly convinced of the need to step up the dialogue on these matters with national Parliaments, civil society and the judicial authorities,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o ustanovitvi foruma za razpravo o politikah in praksah EU na področju pravosodja
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission on the creation of a Forum for discussing EU justice policies and practice
KOM(2008) 38 končno. in sporočila Komisije o usposabljanju na področju pravosodja v Evropski uniji
COM(2008) 38 final. and to the Communication from the Commission on Judicial Training in the EU
KOM(2006) 356 končno. ,
COM(2006) 356 final. ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Za evropsko strategijo na področju e-pravosodja
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission 'Towards a European e-Justice Strategy'
KOM(2008) 329 končno. ,
COM(2008) 329 final. ,
– ob upoštevanju prejšnjih priporočil Evropskega parlamenta
– having regard to previous Recommendations by the European Parliament
A. ker so za sodstvo jasno pristojne države članice EU na nacionalni ravni,
A. whereas judicial competences fall clearly within the national domain of the EU Member States,
B. ker vsakodnevno pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah še vedno temelji na instrumentih vzajemne pomoči, kot sta konvencija o vzajemni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah
B. whereas day-to-day judicial cooperation in criminal matters is still based on mutual assistance instruments such as the 2000 Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:197:0001:0023:EN:PDF iz leta 2000 in konvencija Sveta Evrope o pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:197:0001:0023:EN:PDF and the 1959 Council of Europe Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters
C. ker izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja še zdaleč ni bilo v celoti doseženo, zlasti kar zadeva pridobivanje dokazov v kazenskih postopkih ter postopke za priznavanje ukrepov pred kazenskim postopkom in po njem,
C. whereas the implementation of the mutual recognition principle is far from having been completely achieved, notably as regards obtaining evidence in criminal proceedings and procedures for recognition of pre-trial and post-trial measures,
D. ker mora – če želi biti učinkovito – kazenskopravno območje EU izkoristiti nove tehnologije in uporabiti spletna orodja pri izvajanju politik EU,
D. whereas, in order to be effective, an EU criminal justice area must take advantage of new technologies and use Internet tools in the implementation of EU policies,
E. ker so varovanje pravic, na primer do pravičnega sojenja, domneva nedolžnosti, pravica do obrambe, pravice žrtev kaznivega dejanja in načelo ne bis in idem bistveni v kazenskih postopkih, pri katerih so ogrožene temeljne pravice,
E. whereas the protection of rights such as the right to a fair trial, the presumption of innocence, the right of defence, the rights of victims of crime and the ne bis in idem principle is primarily essential in criminal proceedings in which fundamental freedoms are at stake,
F. ker je učinkovito uveljavljanje teh pravic v glavnem odvisno od oblikovanja evropske skupne pravosodne kulture, ki bi temeljila na skupnih načelih in medsebojnem zaupanju med pravosodnimi sistemi,
F. whereas effective implementation of these rights largely depends on the creation of a European judicial common culture based on common principles and on mutual judicial trust,
G. ker je za ustvarjanje vzajemnega zaupanja in oblikovanje evropske pravosodne kulture bistven učinkovit postopek za ocenjevanje pravosodnih sistemov,
G. whereas with a view to building mutual trust and creating a European judicial culture an effective procedure for the evaluation of justice is essential,
H. ker je vloga nacionalnih sodišč vse pomembnejša v boju proti mednarodnemu kriminalu, pa tudi pri varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
H. whereas the role of national courts is becoming more and more relevant in fighting transnational crime and, at the same time, protecting fundamental rights and freedoms,
I. ker ima usposabljanje na področju pravosodja ključno vlogo pri ustvarjanju vzajemnega zaupanja in razvoju evropske skupne pravosodne kulture,
I. whereas judicial training plays a key role in building mutual trust and developing a common European judicial culture,
(a) naj skupaj z Evropskim parlamentom preuči sedanje pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah na ravni EU, pri tem pa upošteva tako pomanjkljivosti kot napredek;
(a) that it take stock with the EP of the current state of judicial cooperation in criminal matters at EU level, considering both its shortcomings and its progress;
(b) naj učinkovito izvaja načelo vzajemnega priznavanja na področju kazenskega pravosodja ter oceni izvajanje evropskega naloga za prijetje;
(b) that it implement effectively the mutual recognition principle in the area of criminal justice by taking stock of the implementation of the European Arrest Warrant;
(c) naj skupaj z Evropskim parlamentom oblikuje odbor modrecev (pravnikov), ki bi pripravil študijo podobnosti in razlik med sistemi kazenskega prava vseh držav članic ter predložil predloge za razvoj dejanskega prostora za kazensko pravosodje EU;
(c) that it establish, together with the EP, a committee of wise persons (jurists) with the object of preparing a study of the similarities and differences between the criminal law systems of all Member States and to submit proposals for the development of a real EU criminal justice area;
(d) naj nemudoma nadaljuje pripravo postopkovnih zaščitnih ukrepov v kazenskih postopkih;
(d) that it restart work without delay on procedural safeguards in criminal proceedings;
(e) naj nameni ustrezno pozornost prednostim, ki jih nudijo nove tehnologije;
(e) that it pay due attention to advantages offered by new technologies;
(f) naj takoj sprejme ukrepe za spodbujanje oblikovanja dejanske evropske pravosodne kulture v kazenskih postopkih, pri čemer naj se osredotoči na usposabljanje na področju pravosodja in postopke za ocenjevanje kakovosti in učinkovitosti sodstva;
(f) that it take immediate action in order to promote the creation of a real European judicial culture in criminal matters focusing on judicial training and on procedures to evaluate the quality and efficiency of justice;