natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hkrati je predsednik Evropskega sveta, ki mu mandat poteče (in ga ni mogoče ponovno imenovati, če je to njegov drugi mandat), najprimernejši za organizacijo potrebnih usklajevanj med Parlamentom in Evropskim svetom pred predstavitvijo kandidatov za predsednika Komisije, visokega predstavnika in drugih komisarjev.
Furthermore, the outgoing President of the European Council (who, once in his or her second term, cannot be reappointed) will be in the best position to organise the necessary consultations between Parliament and the European Council before the candidates are proposed for President of the Commission, High Representative and the other Members of the Commission.
V skladu s tem časovnim zaporedjem se predsednik Evropskega sveta, ki mu mandat poteče, posvetuje s Parlamentom pred odločitvijo Evropskega sveta o predstavitvi kandidata, o katerem se voli v Evropskem parlamentu.
With that system, it is the outgoing President of the European Council who holds consultations with Parliament prior to the decision by the European Council on the proposal of a candidate to be put forward for election by the European Parliament.
Navedeno priporočilo vključuje naslednji časovni razpored:
This would give us the following timetable:
Prvi teden v juniju: volitve v Evropski parlament
First week in June: European Parliament elections
– prvi in drugi teden: oblikovanje političnih skupin
– weeks 1 and 2: political groups are formed
– tretji teden: predsednik Evropskega sveta se posvetuje s predsedniki političnih skupin o predsedniku Komisije
– week 3: the President of the European Council holds consultations concerning the President of the Commission with the political group chairmen
– četrti in peti teden: Evropski svet s kvalificirano večino predstavi kandidata za predsednika Komisije
– weeks 4 and 5: the European Council, acting by a qualified majority, proposes a candidate for President of the Commission
Sredina julija: Evropski parlament po njegovi predstavitvi izvoli predsednika Komisije
Mid-July: the President of the Commission is elected by Parliament following a hearing
– julij – avgust – september: izvoljeni predsednik Komisije predstavi seznam komisarjev, ki ga mora potrditi Evropski svet.
– July - August - September: the President-elect submits the list of Commissioners to the European Council for approval.
Ta ob soglasju predsednika Komisije predlaga visokega predstavnika
The European Council proposes a candidate for High Representative, with the agreement of the President of the Commission
– do sredine oktobra: Evropski parlament potrdi sestavo Komisije, njenega predsednika in visokega predstavnika
– before mid-October: Parliament gives its consent to the composition of the Commission, including its President and the High Representative
Sredina oktobra: Evropski svet imenuje Komisijo
Mid-October: the Commission is appointed by the European Council
November: izvolitev novega predsednika Evropskega parlamenta
November: Election of the new President of the European Council
Opozoriti je treba, da se je Evropski parlament v eni od svojih resolucij
We should recall that Parliament has asked in a resolution
Tako bi bilo na voljo več časa za posvetovanja med pripravami na izvolitev predsednika Komisije.
This would leave more time for consultations in preparation for the election of the President of the Commission.
Evropski parlament in Evropski svet se morata dogovoriti o časovnem razporedu in postopku imenovanj.
An agreement should be concluded between the European Parliament and the European Council on the timetable and procedure for appointments.
Evropski parlament bi lahko predlagal, da volitve v Evropski parlament potekajo tako, kot je predlagano zgoraj.
Parliament might suggest that the process could kick off with the EP elections, as proposed above.
Člen 17 PEU določa, da predsednika Komisije izvoli Evropski parlament.
Article 17 TEU states that the Commission President shall be elected by the European Parliament.
Kandidata predlaga Evropski svet „ob upoštevanju volitev v Evropski parlament in po opravljenih ustreznih posvetovanjih“.
Nominations are made by the European Council 'taking into account the elections to the European Parliament and after having held the appropriate consultations'.
Pogodba torej upravičeno ne predpisuje uradnega posvetovanja s Parlamentom.
The Treaty, correctly, does not refer to a formal consultation of Parliament.
Vendar izjava št. 11 jasno določa vključenost Evropskega parlamenta, saj sta „Evropski parlament in Evropski svet v skladu z določbami pogodb skupaj odgovorna za nemoten potek postopka za izvolitev predsednika Evropske komisije.
Declaration 11 nonetheless makes it clear that Parliament has to be involved: 'the European Parliament and the European Council are jointly responsible for the smooth running of the process leading to the election of the President of the European Commission.
Pred odločitvijo Evropskega sveta predstavniki Evropskega parlamenta in Evropskega sveta tako opravijo potrebna posvetovanja v okviru, ki velja za najprimernejšega.
Prior to the decision of the European Council, representatives of the European Parliament and of the European Council will thus conduct the necessary consultations in the framework deemed the most appropriate.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 17(7) se ta posvetovanja osredotočijo na strokovne izkušnje kandidatov za funkcijo predsednika Komisije, pri čemer se upoštevajo volitve v Evropski parlament.
These consultations will focus on the backgrounds of the candidates for President of the Commission, taking account of the elections to the European Parliament, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 17(7).
To posvetovanje bi potekalo tretji teden po volitvah, kar bi skupinam omogočilo, da organizirajo prvi in drugi teden.
These consultations would take place three weeks after the elections, thus enabling the groups to organise themselves over the first two weeks.
Za posvetovanja in poročanje Evropskemu svetu bi Evropski svet lahko pooblastil svojega predsednika.
The European Council could mandate its President to carry out the consultations and report back to it.
S tem bi se preprečilo sprejetje uradnega stališča Evropskega parlamenta, kar bi bilo v nasprotju s pogodbo, Evropskemu svetu pa bi omogočilo, da je temeljito obveščen o stališču političnih skupin v Parlamentu.
This procedure would avoid Parliament having to take a formal position (which would be contrary to the Treaty), while allowing the European Council to be fully informed on the positions of the political groups in Parliament.
Vse to bi se odvijalo pod hudim časovnim pritiskom.
This procedure would have to be undertaken under severe time constraints.
Jasno je, da bi bilo časa več, če bi bile volitve v Evropski parlament sredi maja, tako kot si želi Evropski parlament, in ne več sredi junija kot zdaj.
Obviously, should the European Parliament elections take place, as Parliament would like them to, in mid-May (rather than mid-June as is now the case), the timetable for the procedure would be less tight.
Naj spomnimo, da je Duffovo poročilo
It is to be borne in mind that, following the Duff report
A6-0179/2005 : Poročilo o smernicah za potrditev Evropske komisije (7. junij 2005, Andrew Duff). o smernicah za potrditev Evropske komisije vplivalo na spremembo poslovnika Parlamenta, kar zadeva potrditev Komisije
A6 - 0179/2005: Report on guidelines for the approval of the European Commission (7 June 2005, Andrew Duff). on guidelines for the approval of the European Commission, Parliament's Rules of Procedure with respect to the approval of the Commission have been amended.
A6 - 0198/2008: Poročilo o spremembi Poslovnika Parlamenta v zvezi s potrditvijo Komisije (29. maj 2008). .
A6 - 0198/2008: Report on amendment of Parliament's Rules of Procedure with respect to the approval of the Commission (29 May 2008).
Prva imenovanja
First appointments
Zdaj je že jasno, da postopek ratifikacije na Irskem – ob predpostavki, da bo uspešen – ne bo zaključen pred evropskimi volitvami junija 2009.
It is now clear that, even if the ratification process is successfully completed in Ireland, that will not happen before the European elections in June 2009.
Lizbonska pogodba bo torej v najboljšem primeru začela veljati po evropskih volitvah junija 2009, ko bo že izvoljen prihodnji Parlament.
Hence the Treaty of Lisbon will, at best, not enter into force until after the European elections in June 2009, when the next Parliament is already in place.
Zato se med drugim postavlja vprašanje, kakšne posledice bo to imelo za sam Parlament in imenovanje prihodnje Komisije.
Amongst the issues which this raises are its implications for Parliament itself and for the appointment of the next Commission.
Sklepi, ki jih je decembra 2008 podal Evropski svet glede obnovitve postopka ratifikacije v tej državi, lahko služijo kot novo izhodišče za izvedbo prehoda pred verjetno uveljavitvijo lizbonske pogodbe proti koncu letošnjega leta ali na začetku leta 2010.
The conclusions of the December 2008 European Council on resumption of the ratification process in Ireland have provided new points of reference, in the light of which the transition can be reconsidered with a view to the Treaty of Lisbon probably entering into force towards the end of this year or right at the start of 2010.
Poročilo načeloma ne obravnava sestave Evropskega parlamenta.
This report does not, in principle, deal with the composition of the European Parliament.
Vendar je treba kljub temu v grobih potezah preveriti, ali je bilo v sklepih Evropskega sveta, sprejetih decembra 2008, upoštevano stališče Evropskega parlamenta, kot je bilo opredeljeno v poročilu Lamassoure-Séverin.
However, it is worth considering briefly whether the position defined by Parliament in the Lamassoure-Severin report has been taken into account in the conclusions of the December 2008 European Council.
Treba je opozoriti, da je Evropski svet v Lizboni z dodatkom enega poslanca („[...] sedemsto petdeset, poleg predsednika [...]“
It should be borne in mind that, with the sole addition of one Member (750, plus the President
Sedeži so med države članice razdeljeni „proporcionalno upadajoče“, z največ 96 sedeži in najmanj 6 sedeži na državo članico. ) potrdil politični predlog, ki ga je v tem poročilu podal Evropski parlament.
With a maximum of 96 and a minimum of 6 per Member State, the distribution of seats between Member States being based on 'degressive proportionality'. ), the Lisbon European Council had confirmed the European Parliament’s political proposal in that report.
Evropski svet logično ugotavlja, da bodo morale volitve vsekakor potekati v skladu z dogovorom iz Nice (skupaj 736 poslancev, od tega največ (99) za Nemčijo in najmanj (5) za Malto).
Logically, the European Council notes that the elections will in any event have to be conducted in accordance with the Nice system (which provides for 736 Members, with a maximum of 99 for Germany and a minimum of five for Malta).
To pomeni, da bo treba, če bo začela lizbonska pogodba veljati nekaj časa po volitvah, na podlagi predloga Evropskega parlamenta povečati število poslancev iz nekaterih držav članic
That means that, if the Treaty enters into force some time after the elections, the number of Members for certain Member States will need to be increased in accordance with the European Parliament’s proposal
Torej je edina razumna rešitev tista, ki jo ponuja Evropski svet: začasno (do volitev leta 2014) povečanje števila poslancev na 754 (+ 3).
Hence the only reasonable solution is the one specified by the European Council, i.e. that the number of Members is to be provisionally increased (until the 2014 elections) to 754 (+3).
To bi bilo na primer mogoče z vključitvijo prehodne določbe v enega od protokolov, katerega ratifikacija ne bi smela biti vprašljiva
That could be done, for example, by incorporating in a protocol a transitional rule whose ratification should not present any problems
Nekateri evropski voditelji, med drugim francoski predsednik Nicolas Sarkozy, v svojih izjavah omenjajo možnost, da bi to izvedli ob podpisu pristopne pogodbe s Hrvaško.
Public statements by certain European leaders, including President Sarkozy, suggest the possibility of doing so when the treaty for the accession of Croatia is signed.
To bi bilo možno, če bi bila pristopna pogodba podpisana in ratificirana pravočasno, da bi bilo mogoče sestavo Evropskega parlamenta prilagoditi v približno istem času, kot bi začela veljati lizbonska pogodba.
That might be possible if the Treaty were signed and ratified in time for the composition of the European Parliament to be adapted on a date close to that on which the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force.
Vseeno pa bi bilo treba ob tej prilagoditvi upoštevati še število poslancev, dodeljeno Hrvaški, s čimer bi število poslancev Evropskega parlamenta že med mandatom 2009–2014 preseglo število 754.
However, such an adaptation would then have to be coupled with the addition of the number of Members to be allocated to Croatia, which would increase the number of Members of the European Parliament to over 754, even during the 2009-2014 parliamentary term.
Dodatni poslanci bi torej postali polnopravni člani šele po sprejeti spremembi primarne zakonodaje.
The additional representatives would therefore only become full Members once the amendment to primary law had been adopted.
Imenovanje Komisije
Procedure for appointment of the Commission
Glede na zaključke Evropskega sveta, ki se je sestal decembra 2008, se bo postopek imenovanja prihodnje Komisije, zlasti imenovanja njenega predsednika, začel takoj po volitvah v Evropski parlament, ki bodo potekale junija 2009.
The conclusions of the European Council of December 2008 stated that the procedure for appointing the future Commission, in particular the appointment of its President, would be started without delay after the election of the European Parliament in June 2009.
To načeloma pomeni, da se bo postopek imenovanja prihodnje Komisije začel v skladu z določbami iz pogodbe iz Nice.
In principle, that means that the procedure for appointing the future Commission would be commenced in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty of Nice.
V sklepu Evropskega sveta, ki je bil sprejet decembra 2008, je bilo izrecno omenjeno le imenovanje predsednika Komisije, zato se postavlja vprašanje, ali namerava Evropski svet pustiti, da se bo celoten postopek odvijal po enakih pravilih.
Since the decision of the European Council of December 2008 only refers explicitly to the appointment of the President of the Commission, the question arises as to whether it is the intention of the European Council that the whole procedure should be conducted according to the same rules.
Treba je torej razjasniti, kako bo potekalo vodenje postopka imenovanja prihodnje Komisije, zlasti z vidika časovnega razporeda in različnih dejavnikov, povezanih z različnimi fazami postopka na podlagi pogodbe iz Nice ali lizbonske pogodbe.
Clarification is therefore needed as to how the procedure for the appointment of the next Commission is to be conducted, particularly in the light of the calendar and the different implications of the various phases of the procedure, in accordance with the Treaty of Nice or the Treaty of Lisbon.
Če se bo postopek imenovanja prihodnje Komisije – in zlasti imenovanja njenega predsednika – začel takoj po volitvah v Evropski parlament junija 2009, se bo ta postopek začel pred ratifikacijo lizbonske pogodbe, čeprav so pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta v postopku imenovanja predsednika Komisije z lizbonsko pogodbo bistveno okrepljene.
If the process of appointing the next Commission, particularly as regards the appointment of its President, is initiated without delay after the European Parliament elections in June 2009, the process will be starting at a time when the Treaty of Lisbon has not yet been ratified; in practice, the powers of the European Parliament in the process for the appointment of the Commission President are considerably strengthened by the Treaty of Lisbon.
Zato mora biti Parlament še posebej pozoren na to, da ne bodo pod vprašaj postavljene njegove posebne pravice in da ne bo konec koncev predsednik imenovan „po postopku iz Nice“, medtem ko bo izvajal „pristojnosti iz Lizbone“.
Parliament therefore needs to take particular care to ensure that its prerogatives are not called into question and that a situation is not reached in which a President is appointed 'in accordance with the Nice procedure' to exercise powers 'in accordance with the Lisbon procedure'.
Če bo Evropski svet vztrajal pri odločitvi, ki jo je sprejel decembra 2008, mora Evropski parlament vztrajati, da morajo voditelji držav ali vlad (neformalno) upoštevati nove pristojnosti, ki jih Evropskemu parlamentu glede imenovanja predsednika Komisije podeljuje lizbonska pogodba.
If the European Council adheres to its decision of December 2008, the European Parliament must insist that the Heads of State and Government (informally) take account of the new powers acquired by Parliament under the Treaty of Lisbon in respect of the appointment of the Commission President.
Zlasti bi bilo treba upoštevati volilne izide in opraviti posvetovanja z glavnimi političnimi strankami, ki bodo zastopane v Evropskem parlamentu.
In particular, the election results must be taken into account and consultations held with the main political groups represented in the European Parliament.
Če bo želel Evropski svet ravnati v skladu s tem, bo moral po volitvah v Evropski parlament predvideti čas, potreben za posvetovanje, in šele nato Evropskemu parlamentu predložiti kandidaturo za predsednika Komisije.
If the European Council wishes to take such action, it must allow sufficient time for consultation after the European Parliament elections in order to propose to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the Commission.
Prednost takega postopka je, da se v bistvenih elementih sklada z novimi pravili iz lizbonske pogodbe, ne da bi bil zato nezakonit z vidika trenutno veljavne pogodbe iz Nice.
That procedure would have the advantage that it would be substantially consistent with the new rules of the Treaty of Lisbon, without being unlawful according to the Treaty of Nice currently in force.
To bi bila namreč bolj ali manj le ponovitev scenarija iz leta 2004, ki se je neformalno že večinoma skladal s priporočili iz ustavne pogodbe, ki je bila tik pred sklenitvijo, ta priporočila pa so bila nato potrjena v lizbonski pogodbi.
In fact, that would more or less be simply a repetition of the 2004 scenario, which already informally corresponded to a large extent to what was advocated in the Constitutional Treaty that had just been concluded and was subsequently confirmed in the Treaty of Lisbon.
Evropski svet bi s tem pokazal politično voljo, saj bi izrazil pripravljenost, da upošteva voljo evropskih volivcev.
The European Council would be demonstrating political will by showing a willingness to take account of the wishes of the European electorate.
Če bi Irci na novem referendumu ratificirali lizbonsko pogodbo, se ne zdi očitno, da bi bilo treba novo Komisijo imenovati na podlagi pogodbe iz Nice.
If the Irish ratify the Treaty of Lisbon in a further referendum, it does not seem clear that the new Commission is to be appointed in accordance with the Treaty of Nice.
Komisija bi morala biti po začetku veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe formalno imenovana in začeti opravljati svoje funkcije v sestavi in s pristojnostmi na podlagi te pogodbe.
The Commission would have to be formally appointed and take up office in the configuration and with the competences provided for by the Treaty of Lisbon after it entered into force.
To naj bi se po najbolj optimistični različici – v skladu s katero naj bi bil irski referendum organiziran najpozneje oktobra 2009 – zgodilo v začetku leta 2010.
In other words, taking the most optimistic view and assuming that the Irish referendum is held by October 2009 at the latest, at the beginning of 2010.
Trenutni Komisiji se na podlagi pogodbe iz Nice
In fact, according to the Treaty of Nice
Kot je bila spremenjena z Aktom o pogojih pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in prilagoditvah Pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija (člen 45(c)). mandat izteče 31. oktobra 2009.
As amended by the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (Article 45(c)). , the term of office of the present Commission ends on 31 October 2009.
To določbo bi bilo mogoče spremeniti le s spremembo primarne zakonodaje (protokol itd.), kar pa za 27 držav članic očitno ni prednostna naloga.
The only way to alter that arrangement would be to amend primary law (protocol, etc.), which does not appear to be a priority for the 27.
Nasprotno, če nova Komisija na ta datum še ne bi bila imenovana, bi morala svoje funkcije še naprej opravljati sedanja Komisija, vendar bi bile njene pristojnosti najverjetneje omejene na vodenje tekočih poslov.
If, on the other hand, a new Commission had not yet been appointed by that date, the present Commission would have to remain in office, but its powers would then, in all probability, have to be confined to the administration of current business.
Tak položaj lahko traja nekaj tednov ali kvečjemu mesec ali dva, ne pa dlje.
It might be possible to allow that situation to continue for a few weeks or even a month or two, but not longer.
V takih okoliščinah bo moral novi Parlament v sodelovanju z Evropskim svetom po svojih najboljših močeh voditi postopek imenovanja nove Komisije, s čimer bo omogočil, da bo ta potekal ob upoštevanju nove sestave in novih pristojnosti Komisije ter novih pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta, določenih z lizbonsko pogodbo.
In those circumstances it will be for the new Parliament to conduct the procedure for appointment of the new Commission as best it can, in consultation with the European Council, to enable it to proceed with due regard to the new configuration and new competences of the Commission and the new powers conferred on the European Parliament by the Treaty of Lisbon.
Treba je predvideti tudi možnost, da izid referenduma ne bo pozitiven in zato lizbonska pogodba ne bo mogla začeti veljati v začetku leta 2010.
It is also necessary to consider the possibility that the referendum will not have a positive outcome and the Treaty of Lisbon cannot enter into force at the beginning of 2010.
Pri tem se je treba zavedati, da se bodo v tem primeru še naprej uporabljala pravila iz pogodbe iz Nice in da bo moral Svet – kot je to določeno v Protokolu o širitvi Evropske unije – sprejeti odločitev o številu članov prihodnje Komisije (ki mora biti nujno manjše od števila držav članic Unije) in pogoje, pod katerimi bo potekala rotacija, ki bo temeljila na načelu enakosti, kot je to določeno v zadevnem protokolu.
It must be borne in mind that the rules of the Treaty of Nice would remain applicable and that, as provided in the Protocol on the Enlargement of the European Union, the Council would have to adopt the decision fixing the number of Members of the next Commission (which has to be less than the number of Member States of the Union) and the conditions for rotation based on the principle of equality provided for in the Protocol.
Vseeno bo na podlagi načela časovne neomejenosti delovanja institucij izvajal pristojnosti, ki mu jih podeljuje lizbonska pogodba.
However, the European Parliament will exercise the powers assigned to it by the Treaty of Lisbon, in accordance with the principle of continuity of the institutions.