natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Namen foruma, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic in držav, pridruženih sedmemu okvirnemu programu, in ki jih imenujejo njihova ministrstva, je spodbujati večstranske pobude za razvoj in boljšo uporabo raziskovalnih infrastruktur.
The Forum, consisting of representatives from Member States and countries associated to the 7th Framework Programme and nominated by their ministries, intends to facilitate multilateral initiatives for development, and better use, of research infrastructures.
Cilj predlaganega pravnega okvira je olajšati vzpostavljanje teh infrastruktur.
The objective of the legal framework proposed is to facilitate the establishment of these infrastructures.
Pravna podlaga
The legal base
Pravni okvir je bil razvit kot odziv na zahteve nekaterih držav članic in znanstvene skupnosti, ker razpoložljive nacionalne in mednarodne zakonodaje niso ustrezne.
The legal framework has been developed in response to a need signalled by several Member States and the scientific community for a common legal form, since the available national and international legislations are not adequate.
Mnenje poročevalke o predlogu Komisije
The Rapporteur's view on the proposal of the Commission.
Poročevalka se strinja glede pomena spodbujanja vzpostavljanja raziskovalnih infrastruktur na svetovni ravni v Evropi in njihove dodane vrednosti za evropski raziskovalni prostor v smislu boljših raziskav in izobrazbe, več medsebojnih povezav med javnimi in zasebnimi raziskovalci ter splošnega pozitivnega socialno-ekonomskega vpliva.
The rapporteur agrees on the importance of facilitating the establishment of world class research infrastructures in Europe and on their added value for the European Research Area in terms of improved research and education, more interconnections among public and private researchers, and in general a positive socioeconomic impact.
Glede na koristi za evropsko raziskovalno delo bo vzpostavitev obsežne infrastrukture omogočila boljše priložnosti za odlično raziskovanje na številnih področjih, tesnejše sodelovanje med evropskimi raziskovalnimi skupinami, boljše priložnosti za meddisciplinarno raziskovalno delo in bo tudi privabila raziskovalce iz tretjih držav.
In regards to the benefit for European research, the establishment of large scale infrastructures will result in increased opportunities for excellent research in several fields, closer collaboration among European research teams, increased opportunities for transdisciplinary research as well as attracting third country researchers.
Poleg tega je treba poudariti tudi pozitivni učinek tovrstnih infrastruktur za izobraževanje mladih raziskovalcev, še posebej raziskovalk, kot tudi za usposabljanje tehničnih strokovnjakov in inženirjev.
Furthermore, the positive effect of such infrastructures on the training of young researchers, in particular women, as well as the training of skilled technicians and engineers should be highlighted.
Obsežna infrastruktura obsega vključevanje velikega števila študentov, znanstvenikov in strokovnega osebja, kar prispeva, da se k znanosti, raziskovanju in tehnologijam privabi več mladih ljudi.
Large scale implies involving many students, researchers and technical staff, which contributes to attracting more young people to science, research and engineering.
Poročevalka se strinja tudi glede povečanih možnosti za prenos novega znanja in za izboljšanje povezave med industrijo in akademskim raziskovalnim delom.
The rapporteur agrees also on the increased possibilities for the transfer of new knowledge and the improved interface between industry and academic research.
Drugi pomemben vidik raziskovalnih infrastruktur na svetovni ravni je gospodarski vpliv na okolico in na industrijsko podlago zadevne regije.
Another important aspect of world class research infrastructures is the economic impact on the surrounding area and its effect on the industrial base of the region involved.
Vsekakor pa visoki stroški vzpostavljanja obsežnih infrastruktur zahtevajo na splošno skupne napore večjega števila držav in kažejo potrebo, da se nacionalna zakonodaja prilagodi zahtevam večnacionalnih organov.
However, the high cost of establishing large scale infrastructures requires in general the combined efforts of several countries and a need to adapt national legislation to the requirements of multinational bodies.
Glede na vse razloge se poročevalka strinja, da je splošni pravni okvir nujen ter da bi lahko olajšal in pospešil razvoj teh infrastruktur.
For all this reasons this rapporteur agrees that a common legal framework is needed and that it could facilitate and speed up the development of these infrastructures.
Ključna vprašanja ter spremembe, ki jih predlaga poročevalka:
The key issues and changes proposed by the rapporteur:
· Opredelitev, področje uporabe in status
· Definition, scope and status
Odsotnost opredelitve evropske raziskovalne infrastrukture in celo raziskovalne infrastrukture vseevropskega interesa otežuje pravilno razumevanje predlagane uredbe.
The absence of definitions of an ERI and even of a research infrastructure of pan European interest complicates the correct understanding of the proposed regulation.
Poimenovanje „ERI“ za pravno osebo, ki sledi iz pravnega okvira, ki je predmet predloga, je zelo neposrečeno, zaradi česar se pravna oseba, ki izhaja iz statusa ERI, ki je bil odobren raziskovalni infrastrukturi, zameša z dejansko raziskovalno infrastrukturo, ki je zaprosila za status ERI.
The name "ERI" chosen for the legal entity- which will result from the legal framework object of the proposal- is most unfortunate, since it results in confusion between the legal entity resulting from the granting of ERI status to an applicant research infrastructure and the actual research infrastructure applying for an ERI status.
Področje uporabe pravnega okvira mora biti dostopno vsaki vseevropski raziskovalni infrastrukturi, ki je skladna z zadevno uredbo.
The scope of the legal framework should be available for any existing pan-European research infrastructure which complies with the established regulation.
Predlog je namenjen novim raziskovalnim infrastrukturam.
However, the proposal is aimed at new research infrastructures.
· Merila za izbiro ERI
· The criteria for selection of ERI
Zahteve, navedene v členu 3, so preveč nejasne in določajo bolj splošne cilje kot pa posebna merila.
The requirements set out in Article 3 are too vague and constitute more of general objectives than specific criteria.
Kot merila za izbiro je treba upoštevati oceno učinka vsakega predloga, zagotovljeno financiranje udeleženih držav članic in obstoj politike dostopa, ki zagotovijo, da mednarodna raziskovalna skupnost lahko uporablja te storitve.
Impact assessment of each proposal, committed funding from participant Member States and the existence of an access policy to ensure the service to the international research community should be considered as selection criteria.
· Vrednotenje predlogov
· Evaluation of proposals
Merila za ocenjevanje predlogov kot tudi ocenjevalni postopek morajo biti jasno navedeni.
The criteria for evaluation of proposals as well as the process of evaluation should be clearly stated.
Zlasti ocena učinka vsakega predloga je ključen element pri ocenjevanju vlog.
In particular, the impact assessment of each proposal is a necessary element in the evaluation of applications.
· Izvzetje iz obdavčevanja
· Exemption from taxes
Oprostitev davka in odstopanje od direktiv o javnih naročilih sta ključni orodji za spodbujanje mednacionalnega sodelovanja pri vzpostavljanju obsežnih infrastruktur.
Tax exemption and derogation of public procurement directives are essential instruments to promote transnational cooperation in the establishment of large scale infrastructures.
Predlog mora upoštevati to stališče.
The proposal should reflect this position.
Članstvo pridruženih držav in tretjih držav je jasno utemeljeno, po potrebi utemeljeno na znanstveni podlagi.
Membership of associated countries is clearly justified as well as that of third countries, if appropriate on scientific grounds.
Vendar mora biti sedež ERI (ali vsakega operativnega mesta) vedno v državi članici, saj je status pridružene države začasen, ki traja tako dolgo, kot traja ustrezen okvirni program, medtem ko bo ERI stalna zmogljivost.
However the seat of an ERI (and any other operational sites) should be always a Member State, since the status of associated country is a temporary one lasting as long as the corresponding Framework programme, while an ERI will normally be a permanent facility.
· Politika dostopa
· Access policy
Odprt dostop raziskovalcev do ERI mora ustrezati potrebi, da ima ERI uravnovešen proračun.
The open access of researchers to the ERI must be matched with the need for an ERI to have a balanced budget.
Glede na razlike med tipi infrastruktur v smislu stroškov za vzpostavitev in delovanje ter števila potencialnih uporabnikov morajo statuti vključevati politiko dostopa za raziskovalce iz tretjih držav in držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije.
Given the differences among types of infrastructures in terms of costs - on both construction and operation- and the number of potential users, the statutes should include the policies of access by researchers from third countries and non member European countries.
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Miloslavu Ransdorfu
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Miloslav Ransdorf
PRILOGA: Člen 27(4) češke ustave:............................................................................................7
ANNEX: Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution..........................................................................8
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Miloslavu Ransdorfu, ki so jo posredovali pristojni organi Češke republike dne 16. junija 2008 in ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 9. julija 2008,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Miloslav Ransdorf, forwarded by the competent authority of the Czech Republic on 16 June 2008, and announced in plenary sitting on 9 July 2008,
– po zagovoru Miloslava Ransdorfa, v skladu s členom 7(3) svojega poslovnika,
– having heard Miloslav Ransdorf in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju člena 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965, pa tudi člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976
– having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
Primer 101/63 Wagner proti Fohrmann in Krier [1964] Zbirka 383, in primer 149/85 Wybot proti Faure in drugi [1986] Zbirka 2391. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– ob upoštevanju člena 27(4) češke ustave,
– having regard to Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0008/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0008/2009 ),
A. ker je Miroslav Ransdorf poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, v katerega je bil izvoljen na šestih neposrednih volitvah, ki so potekale med 10. in 13. junijem 2004, in ker je Parlament veljavnost njegovega mandata preveril 14. decembra 2004
A. whereas Miroslav Ransdorf is a Member of the European Parliament who was elected in the sixth direct elections of 10 to 13 June 2004 and whereas his credentials were verified by Parliament on 14 December 2004
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta 2004/2140(REG) o preverjanju veljavnosti mandatov poslancev (UL C 226 E, 15.9.2005, str.
European Parliament Decision 2004/2140(REG) on the verification of credentials (OJ C 226 E, 15.9.2005, p.
B. ker v skladu s členom 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965, med zasedanji Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države; ker kadar je poslanec zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja, sklicevanje na imuniteto ni mogoče; in ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu,
B. whereas, according to Article 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament; whereas immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is caught in the act of committing an offence; and whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
C. ker v skladu s členom 27(4) češke ustave ni mogoče kazensko preganjati poslanca parlamenta ali senatorja brez soglasja predstavniškega telesa, katere član je, in, če to telo odreče svoje soglasje, je kazenski pregon za vedno prepovedan,
C. whereas, according to Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution, no Member of Parliament or Senator may be criminally prosecuted without the consent of the chamber of which he or she is member and, if the respective chamber denies its consent, criminal prosecution shall be excluded forever,
Po poročanju čeških oblasti je Miroslav Ransdorf 8. junija 2007 v Pragi vozil osebni avtomobil, ko je z avtom zadel in poškodoval peško na označenem prehodu za pešce pri čemer je peška utrpela telesne poškodbe.
According to the Czech authorities, on 8 June 2007, Mr Ransdorf was driving a private car in Prague 6 when he struck and injured a female pedestrian at a zebra crossing who sustained injuries which constituted bodily harm.
S tem dejanjem je Miroslav Ransdorf kršil določbo člena 5/1h zakona št. 361/2000 o cestnem prometu.
By his action, Mr Ransdorf contravened the provisions of paragraph 5/1h of Law No 361/2000 Coll. on the road traffic act.
Gre za primer utemeljenega suma, da je bilo storjeno kaznivo dejanje telesne poškodbe v skladu s členom 223 zakona št. 140/1961 - Kazenskega zakonika, ki določa: " Kdor drugega telesno poškoduje iz malomarnosti, s kršitvijo pomembne obveznosti, ki izvira iz njegovega dela, poklica, položaja ali dolžnosti, ki mu jo nalaga zakon, se kaznuje z zaporno kaznijo do enega leta ali s prepovedjo opravljanja dejavnosti."
This is a case of reasonable suspicion that a criminal act - injury to health - was committed under paragraph 223 of Law No 140/1961 Coll. - the Criminal Code, which states: "A person who injures another’s health through negligence, by breaching an important duty arising from his employment, profession, position or office or a duty imposed by law, shall be punished by a term imprisonment of up to one year or prohibition of a (specific) activity."
Vsakdo, ki stori kaznivo dejanje, postane prestopnik po kazenskem zakoniku (člen 9).
Any person who himself commits a criminal act becomes an offender under the Criminal Code (paragraph 9).
Določbe člena 65 kazenskega zakonika o prenehanju nevarnosti, ki jo kaznivo dejanje prestavlja za družbo, v skladu s katero "Odgovornost za kaznovanje dejanja, ki je bilo nevarno za družbo, ko je bilo storjeno, preneha, če zaradi spremembe okoliščin ali v osebni sferi storilca je nevarnost, ki jo to kaznivo dejanje predstavlja za družbo, prenehalo", ni mogoče uporabiti v tem primeru.
The provisions of paragraph 65 of the Criminal Code on the cessation of the danger represented by a criminal act to society, pursuant to which "The liability to punishment for an act which was dangerous to society when it was committed shall extinguish if, because of a change in the situation or person of the offender, the danger represented by such criminal act to society has passed." may not be used in this case.
V skladu s členom 67/1d kazenskega zakonika je zastaralna doba tri leta.
Under paragraph 67/1d of the Criminal Code, the period of limitation is three years.
Člena 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 določa naslednje:
Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, read as follows:
V primerih zaščite imunitete ali privilegijev odbor preveri, ali okoliščine predstavljajo upravno ali kako drugo omejitev svobode gibanja poslancev pri potovanju v kraje ali iz krajev zasedanja Parlamenta ali pri izražanju mnenja ali glasovanju v okviru izvrševanja mandata in ali sodijo v okvir člena 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah, ki niso predmet nacionalne zakonodaje, ter predlaga, da se zadevni organ zaprosi, naj sprejme potrebne sklepe.
In cases concerning the defence of immunity or privileges, the committee shall state whether the circumstances constitute an administrative or other restriction imposed on the free movement of Members travelling to or from the place of meeting of Parliament or an opinion expressed or a vote cast in the performance of the mandate or fall within aspects of Article 10 of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities which are not a matter of national law, and shall make a proposal to invite the authority concerned to d raw the necessary conclusions.
Seveda uporaba člena 9 protokola ne pride v poštev iz razloga, ki je očiten, in sicer, da v nobenem primeru telesne poškodbe, ki jih povzroči voznik osebnega avtomobila, ne morejo pomeniti mnenja ali glasu, ki ga poslanec Evropskega parlamenta izreče pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti.
First and foremost, the applicability of Article 9 of the Protocol is obviously out of question for the evident reason that in no way can personal injuries caused by a car driver be equated with the opinions expressed or the votes cast in the performance of the duties of a Member of the European Parliament.
V členu 10 pa je edini odsek, ki ga je mogoče uporabiti, glede na to, da so obtožbe, ki bremenijo Miroslava Ransdorferja, povezane z dejanji, ki jih je storil v Češki republiki, katere državljan je bil v tistem trenutku, naslednji: "Med zasedanjem Skupščine njeni člani uživajo: a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države”.
As for Article 10, given that the charges brought against Mr Ransdorf refer to facts committed in the Czech Republic, whose citizenship he enjoyed at that moment, the only applicable part is the following: " During the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy: a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament ".
Namen poslanske imunitete v Češki republiki je zelo podoben namenu, ki služi delovanju Evropskega parlamenta, ki temelji na Protokolu o privilegijih in imunitetah.
The scope of the parliamentary immunity in the Czech Republic is very similar to the one that serves the functioning of the European Parliament as based on the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities.
Zlasti zakon št. 141/1961 - Kazenski zakonik, člen 10, v zvezi z izključitvijo iz pristojnosti organov, ki so pristojni za kazenski postopek, določa: "Osebe, ki uživajo privilegije ali imuniteto po nacionalnem ali mednarodnem pravu so izključene iz pristojnosti organov, ki so v skladu s tem zakonom pristojni za kazenski postopek."
In particular, Law No 141/1961 Coll. - the Criminal Code, paragraph 10 relating to exclusion from the jurisdiction of the bodies competent for criminal proceedings, states: "Persons enjoying privileges or immunities under national law or international law shall be excluded from the jurisdiction of the bodies competent for criminal proceedings under this code."
Nadalje člen 27(4) češke ustave določa, da "Ni mogoče kazensko preganjati poslanca ali senatorja brez soglasja predstavniškega telesa, katerega član je.
Furthermore, Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution provides that "No Deputy or Senator may be criminally prosecuted without the consent of the chamber of which he or she is member.
V kolikor to telo zavrne soglasje, je kazenski pregon za vedno izključen".
If the respective chamber denies its consent, criminal prosecution shall be excluded forever" .
Z drugimi besedami, po veljavnih čeških zakonih je mogoče začeti kazenski postopek zoper Miroslava Ransdorfa le pod pogojem, da se Miroslavu Ransdorfu odvzame imuniteta.
In other words, under current Czech laws, criminal proceedings may be initiated against Mr Ransdorf only on condition that his immunity be waived.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso bi se Evropski parlament lahko odločil, da prizna imuniteto enega svojih poslancev, če bi obstajal sum, da je namen pregona oškodovanje poslančevega političnega delovanja (fumus persecutionis).
Following its established practice, the European Parliament could decide not to waive the immunity of one of its Members if a suspicion existed that the prosecution was based on an intention to prejudice the Member's political activities ( fumus persecutionis) .
V primeru poslanca Ransdorfa ni očitnih dokazov za to.
However, there is no clear evidence to that effect in this case.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti odvzemu imunitete, Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament odvzame poslansko imuniteto Miroslava Ransdorfa.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against waiving his immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Miroslav Ransdorf should be waived.
PRILOGA: Člen 27(4) češke ustave:
ANNEX: Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution
Člen 27(4) češke ustave določa:
Article 27(4) of the Czech Constitution reads:
"Ni mogoče kazensko preganjati poslanca ali senatorja brez soglasja predstavniškega telesa, katere član je.
"No Member of Parliament or Senator may be criminally prosecuted without the consent of the chamber of which he or she is member.
V kolikor to telo zavrne soglasje, je kazenski pregon za vedno izključen".
If the respective chamber denies its consent, criminal prosecution shall be excluded forever."
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o odobritvi sprememb Konvencije o prihodnjem večstranskem sodelovanju v ribištvu severovzhodnega Atlantika, ki omogočajo uvedbo postopkov za reševanje sporov, razširitev področja uporabe Konvencije in revizijo njenih ciljev
on the proposal for a Council decision on the approval of amendments to the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic Fisheries allowing for the establishment of dispute settlement procedures, the extension of the scope of the Convention and a review of the objectives of the Convention
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2008)0512 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2008)0512 )
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0338/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0338/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6–0009/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A6‑0000/2008),
Konvencija o prihodnjem večstranskem sodelovanju v ribištvu severovzhodnega Atlantika (v nadaljnjem besedilu "konvencija") je bila podpisana v Londonu 18. novembra 1980, veljati pa je začela 17. marca 1982.
The C onvention on future multilateral cooperation in the Nort h-East Atlantic Fisheries (the C onvention), was signed in London on 18 November 1980 and entered into force on 17 March 1982.
Skupnost je h konvenciji pristopila 13. julija 1981
The Community acceded to the Convention on 13 July 1981
UL L 227, 12.8.1981, str.
OJ L 227, 12.8.1981, p.