natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– med drugim s prerazporeditvijo proračunskih sredstev iz programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije (CIP): temu programu se leta 2011 zmanjšajo sredstva za 6,5 milijona (19 milijonov v obdobju 2011–2013), čeprav je bil ena od maloštevilnih prednostnih nalog, ki jih je Parlament uspel zagotoviti in promovirati pri drugem branju.
- redeploying, amongst others, appropriations from Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP): this programme is reduced by 6.5 million in 2011 (19 million over the period 2011-2013), although this was one of the very few priorities that the Parliament managed to secure and promote in 2nd reading.
– z zmanjšanjem razlike do zgornje meje: maja 2009 je razlika do zgornje meje, predvidena za proračun 2011, znašala 127 milijonov.
- reducing the margin: in May 2009, the margin foreseen for Budget 2011 amounted to 127 million.
Januarja 2010 se je ta programirana razlika do zgornje meje skrčila na 37 milijonov .
In January 2010, this programmed margin has shrunk to 37 million .
Poročevalka se zaveda, da tako majhna razlika do zgornje meje ne omogoča nobenega manevrskega prostora za oktobrsko branje.
You rapporteur is fully aware that such a small margin does not leave any margin of manoeuvre for the October Reading.
Spomniti želi, da je v PPP 2010 razlika znašala 119 milijonov, in da je bil po mnenju Parlamenta ta znesek že veliko premajhen, da bi omogočal financiranje njegovih prednostnih nalog.
She wishes to recall that in PDB 2010, the margin was 119 million, an amount already estimated as much too low by the Parliament to allow for the financing of its priorities.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi niso vključeni v finančno programiranje.
As mentioned above, PP/PA are not included in the financial programming.
V proračunu za leto 2010 so pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi v razdelku 1a znašali 28,1 milijona: če Parlament želi samo ponovno pridobiti isto raven odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za pilotne projekte in pripravljalne ukrepe (in uvesti nove pilotne projekte in pripravljalne ukrepe za znesek, kot so ga imeli zaključeni), bi se razlika zmanjšala na manj kot 9 milijonov, kar predstavlja 0,07 % zgornje meje za razdelek 1a .
PP/PA in heading 1a amounted to 28.1 million in Budget 2010: if the Parliament wishes only to restore the same level of appropriations for PP/PA (and introduce new PP/PA for the amount as the completed ones), the margin would fall to below 9 million, which represents 0.07% of the ceiling for H1a .
Iz tega je očitno, da bo marca 2010 matematično nemogoče sprejeti financiranje prednostnih nalog za proračun 2011, kot je opredeljeno v resoluciji, brez prerazporeditev iz nekaterih programov in instrumentov (po možnosti na podlagi nezadovoljivih stopenj izvajanja), ali če v drugem času v obdobju 2007-2013 ne bo uporabljeno eno od sredstev, ki jih predvideva medinstitucionalni sporazum.
This situation reveals that the financing of priorities for Budget 2011, as defined in the EP resolution to be adopted in March 2010, will be mathematically impossible without either redeployment from certain programmes and instruments (possibly on the basis of dissatisfactory implementation rates), or, for another time in the period 2007-2013, use of one of the means provided by the IIA.
RAZDELEK 1A - KONKURENČNOST ZA RAST IN ZAPOSLOVANJE
HEADING 1A - COMPETITIVENESS FOR GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT
Programi iz postopka soodločanja
Codecision programmes
Okvir za raziskave (ES)
Research Framework (CE)
Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost
Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme
Ukrepi proti onesnaževanju
Anti-pollution measures
Program Marco Polo II
Marco Polo II
Vseevropsko prometno omrežje (TEN-T)
TEN Transport
Vseevropsko energetsko omrežje (TEN-E)
TEN Energy
Varnejši internet plus
Safer Internet Plus
Varnejši internet plus (nadaljevanje)
Safer Internet Plus (continuation)
Evropske digitalne vsebine v globalnih omrežjih (eContent Plus)
European digital content for global networks (eContent Plus)
Carina 2008–2013
Customs 2008-2013
Računalniško vodenje sistema trošarin (EMCS)
Computerisation of the excise system (EMCS)
Evropski tehnološki inštitut
European Institute for Technology
Vseživljenjsko učenje
Lifelong Learning
Herkul II
Hercule II
Interoperabilnostne rešitve za evropske javne uprave (ISA)
Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrtions (ISA)
Priprava statističnih podatkov
Production of Statistical Information
Statistični program Skupnosti 2008-2012
Community Statistical Programme 2008-2012
Pomoč za finančne storitve in revizije
Support to financial services and auditing
Evropski energetski program za oživitev
European Energy Programme for Recovery
Evropski mikrofinančni instrument
European Microfinance Facility
Evropski program za opazovanje zemlje (GMES)
European Earth observation programme (GMES)
Sklepi Sveta
Council's decisions
Okvir za raziskave (EURATOM)
Research Framework (EURATOM)
Okvir za raziskave (EURATOM) Dodatni reaktor z visokim pretokom
Research Framework (EURATOM) Supplementary High-flux reactor
Razgradnja jedrske elektrarne: Bohunice
Nuclear decommissioning: Bohunice
Razgradnja jedrske elektrarne: Ignalina
Nuclear decommissioning: Ignalina
Razgradnja jedrske elektrarne: Kozloduy
Nuclear decommissioning: Kozloduy
Evropsko leto enakih možnosti za vse (2007) – Za pravično družbo
European Year of Equal Opportunities for All (2007) — towards a just society
Informacijski sistem za boj proti goljufijam
Anti-Fraud Information System
Programi v okviru razdelka 1A skupaj (brez ESPG))
Total programmes Heading 1A (without EGF)
Drugi izdatki
Other expenditure
RAZDELEK 1A SKUPAJ (brez ESPG))
TOTAL HEADING 1A (Without EGF)
Rezerva za Evropski sklad za prilagajanje globalizaciji
Reserve for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
Vse tabele so v milijonih EUR, vir: Evropska komisija
All tables in EUR million, source : European Commission
Razdelki 1b, 2 in 3a
Headings 1b, 2 and 3a
Razmišljanje o razliki do zgornje meje v podrazdelku 1b je nepomembno, ker je finančno programiranje prilagojeno potrebam, ki so jih ugotovile države članice.
Reflection on the margin in sub heading 1b is irrelevant since the financial programming is adapted to the needs identified by the Member States.
V razdelku 2 je razlika do zgornje meje nespremenjena, čeprav je programiran prenos 53 milijonov iz tržnih izdatkov in neposredne pomoči v razvoj podeželja, kot je predvideno v sklepu Komisije.
As regards heading 2, the margin remains unchanged although a shift of 53 million is programmed from Market expenditure and direct aids to Rural development, as foreseen in the Commission Decision.
Razlika do zgornje meje v podrazdelku 3a je nespremenjena in za leto 2011 znaša 19,7 milijona, vendar pa na tej stopnji Komisija ni pojasnila, ali je v to programiranje vključen stockholmski program.
The margin in Sub-Heading 3a remains unchanged at 19.7 million for 2011, but it is unclear at this stage from the Commission whether the Stockholm programme is included in this programming.
RAZDELEK 1B – KOHEZIJA ZA RAST IN ZAPOSLOVANJE
HEADING 1B - COHESION FOR GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT
Strukturni skladi skupaj
Total Structural Funds
Kohezijski skladi skupaj
Total Cohesion Funds
Programi iz razdelka 1B skupaj
Total programmes Heading 1B
RAZDELEK 1B SKUPAJ
TOTAL HEADING 1B
RAZDELEK 2 – OHRANJANJE IN UPRAVLJANJE NARAVNIH VIROV
HEADING 2 - PRESERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Tržni izdatki in neposredne pomoči (po prenosu v razvoj podeželja) vključno z naslednjim programom iz postopka soodločanja: Raziskave o strukturi kmetijskih gospodarstev
Market expenditure and direct aids (after transfer to Rural Development) including the following co-decided programme : Surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings
Raziskave o strukturi kmetijskih gospodarstev (vključene v Tržne izdatke in neposredne pomoči)
Surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings (included in 'Market expenditure and direct aids)
Tržni izdatki in neposredne pomoči (po prenosu v razvoj podeželja)
Market expenditure and direct aids (after transfer to Rural Development)
Razvoj podeželja
Rural Development
Skupna ribiška politika in pomorsko pravo
Common Fisheries Policy and Law of the Sea
Programi iz razdelka 2 skupaj
Total programmes Heading 2
Ukrepi v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami
Climate change actions
RAZDELEK 2 SKUPAJ
TOTAL HEADING 2
Preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje
Drugs prevention & information
Schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS II)
Schentgen Information System (SIS II)
Povezovanje s tretjimi državami
Integration Third-countries
Programi iz razdelka 3A skupaj
Total programmes Heading 3A
RAZDELEK 3A SKUPAJ
TOTAL HEADING 3A
Razdelek 3b je skupaj z razdelkom 1a temeljni element za financiranje prednostnih nalog EP v proračunu za leto 2011 in bolj na splošno za oblikovanje „Evrope za državljane“.
Heading 3b is, together with heading 1a, a fundamental element for the financing of EP priorities in Budget 2011 and more generally for the shaping of a "Europe for citizens".
Ker so bila proračunska sredstva za odziv EU na pandemijo prašičje gripe za leto 2009 porabljena v začetku obdobja, je za leto 2011 programirano rahlo povečanje, za razliko 9,4 milijona do zgornje meje.
Due to a frontloading in 2009 of appropriations for the EU response to the pandemic swine flu, a slight increase is programmed in 2011, for a margin of 9.4 million .
V PPP 2010 je bila razlika do zgornje meje dvakrat tolikšna, in sicer 18,7 milijona.
In PDB 2010, the margin was twice as big, at 18.7 million.
Decembra 2009 je proračunski organ v razdelku 3b izglasoval proračun brez razlike do zgornje meje.
In December 2009, the budgetary authority voted a budget with zero margin in H3b.
Programirana razlika do zgornje meje zagotovo ne bo omogočala financiranja novih prednostnih nalog v korist mladih in s tem povezanih dejavnosti, ker na primer pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi za razdelek 3b že znašajo 9 milijonov v proračunu 2010.
The programmed margin will certainly not allow the financing of new priorities in favour of Youth and related actions, since, for example, PP//PA amounted already to 9 million in Budget 2010 for heading 3b.
Morebitna preostala razlika do zgornje meje, 400.000 EUR (izračunano iz morebitnega podaljšanja vseh pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov, ki se odštejejo od razlike), ni sprejemljiva kot izhodišče, in treba bi bilo razmisliti o enakih rešitvah kakor v zvezi z razdelkom 1a.
A potential remaining margin of EUR 400.000 (calculated from a potential prolongation of all PP/PA deducted from the margin) is not acceptable as a starting point, and the same solutions should be reflected upon as regards H1a.
RAZDELEK 3.2 – DRŽAVLJANSTVO
HEADING 3B - CITIZENSHIP
Finančni instrument za civilno zaščito
Civil Protection Financial Instrument
Programi iz razdelka 3B skupaj
Total programmes Heading 3B
RAZDELEK 3B SKUPAJ
TOTAL HEADING 3B
V proračunu 2010 zaradi konkurenčnih tradicionalnih prednostnih nalog, ki jih podpira EP, in nepredvidljivih potreb v tretjih državah, ki so se pojavile v proračunskem postopku, razlika do zgornje meje znaša samo 900.000.
The margin left in Budget 2010 was only 900.000, due to the competing traditional priorities the EP supports and the unpredictable needs in third countries that arose in the course of the budgetary procedure.
V razdelku 4 je za leto 2011 programirana razlika 128 milijonov do zgornje meje , kar predstavlja samo 1,5 % zgornje meje.
A margin of 128 million is programmed under H4 for 2011, which represents only 1.5% of the ceiling.
Financiranje spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane, ki znaša 25 milijonov, je ustrezno zmanjšalo programirano razliko do zgornje meje, kljub močnemu nasprotovanju Parlamenta uporabi razlike za financiranje ukrepov, ki niso bili predvideni v večletnem finančnem okviru.
The financing of Bananas accompanying measures, at 25 million, has reduced the programmed margin accordingly, despite Parliament's strong reluctance to use the margin for the financing of measures which were not foreseen in the MFF.
Kot je že večkrat ponovil, „novi ukrepi zahtevajo nova sredstva“.
As repeatedly recalled, "new measures require new funds".
Poleg tega je treba spomniti, da je EP večkrat ponovil svoje ostro nasprotovanje metodi, ki jo večkrat uporablja Komisija, da v svojem predlogu podcenjuje proračunska sredstva, ki so potrebna za Palestino, in trdi, da realnih potreb ni mogoče oceniti v tem obdobju leta.
Furthermore, it has to be recalled that the EP has always expressed its strong opposition to the recurring method used by the Commission to underestimate in its proposal the appropriations required for Palestine, claiming that the real needs cannot be assessed at this period of the year.
Razlika v razdelku 4 mora biti usklajena z dejstvom, da so pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi v razdelku 4 v proračunu 2010 prejeli 26 milijonov, in z odsotnostjo programiranja v letu 2011 za strategijo EU za Baltsko morje ali informacijskih in komunikacijskih programov za države nečlanice (in sicer 20 oziroma 10 milijonov v proračunu 2010).
Heading 4 margin must be put in perspective with the fact that PP//PA in heading 4 received 26 million in Budget 2010, and with the absence of any programming in 2011 for either the EU Baltic Sea Strategy or Information and communication programmes for non-members countries (respectively 20 and 10 million in Budget 2010).
V tej predhodni fazi priprave predloga proračuna pri Komisiji bi bilo zanimivo poznati razloge za odsotnost programiranja za strategijo EU za Baltsko morje, ki je bila vedno jasno označena kot prednostna naloga EP.
It would be interesting, at this preliminary stage of the drafting of Commission's Draft Budget, to know the reasoning behind this absence of programming for EU Baltic Sea Strategy that has always been clearly identified as an EP priority.
RAZDELEK 4 – EVROPSKA UNIJA KOT GLOBALNI AKTER
HEADING 4 - EUROPEAN UNION AS A GLOBAL PLAYER
Evropski sosedski in partnerski instrument
European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI)
Instrument za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja
Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI)
Evropski instrument za demokracijo in človekove pravice (EIDHR)
European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)
Instrument za stabilnost (IFS)
Instrument for Stability (IFS)
Instrument za predpristopno pomoč
Instrument for Pre-Accession
Rezerve za posojilno jamstvo
Loan Guarantee Reserve
Instrument za financiranje sodelovanja z industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom
Financing Instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high income countries and territories
Instrument za financiranje sodelovanja z industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom ICI+
Financing Instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high income countries and territories ICI +
Sodelovanje z Grenlandijo
Cooperation with Greenland
Programi iz razdelka 4 skupaj
Total programmes Heading 4
RAZDELEK 4 SKUPAJ (brez EAR)
TOTAL HEADING 4 (without EAR)
Stanje razlike do zgornje meje v tem razdelku za leto 2011 je deloma posledica odločbe Sodišča Evropske unije potem, ko sta Komisija in Evropski parlament oporekala povečanjem plač za leto 2009.
The situation of the margin in this heading for 2011 relies partially on the outcome of the Rule of the Court of Justice following the challenge lodged by the Commission and the European Parliament as regards the pay increase for 2009.
Ker je Sodišče pred kratkim zavrnilo obravnavanje zadeve po pospešenem postopku, je zelo verjetno, da bodo morala biti vsa dodatna plačila (v primeru take odločitve) predvidena v proračunu 2011.
Since the Court has recently refused to treat the case through an accelerated procedure, it is likely that any complementary payments (in case of such a decision) will have to be budgeted in 2011.
Naj spomnimo, da bi lahko razlika za plačilo z retroaktivnim učinkom znašala 135 milijonov v vseh institucijah, v primerjavi s programirano razliko 109 milijonov do zgornje meje leta 2011.
As a reminder, the difference to be paid, with retroactive effect, could amount to 135 million across all institutions, to be compared to the programmed margin of 109 million in 2011.
Poročevalka želi tudi spomniti, da je Parlament vedno izražal željo, naj bodo vsi upravni odhodki v razdelku 5, in se ni strinjal s širjenjem nekaterih upravnih odhodkov v druge razdelke.
Finally, your rapporteur wants to recall that the Parliament has always expressed its wish to see all administrative expenditures fall under heading 5 and its disapproval as regards the spreading of some administrative expenditures in other headings.
RAZDELEK 5 – UPRAVA
HEADING 5 - ADMINISTRATION
Izdatki Komisije, razen pokojnin in evropskih šol
Commission's expenditure, excluding pensions and European Schools
Pokojnine (vse institucije)
Pensions (all institutions)
Izdatki drugih institucij, razen pokojnin
Other institutions' expenditure, excluding pensions
RAZDELEK 5 SKUPAJ
TOTAL HEADING 5
Pravni okvir pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov
Legal framework for Pilot projects and Preparatory actions
Evropski parlament je pilotne projekte in pripravljalne ukrepe prvič uvedel leta 1975; od takrat naprej so se z raznimi medinstitucionalnimi pogajanji razvili v pomembna orodja za opredeljevanje političnih prednostnih nalog in uvajanje novih pobud, ki bi lahko postale dejavnosti in programi EU.
Pilot projects (PP) and Preparatory Actions (PA) have been firstly introduced by the European parliament in 1975, and have evolved, throughout various inter institutional negotiations, into important tools for the formulation of political priorities and the introduction of new initiatives that might turn into EU activities and programmes.
Člen 49(6) finančne uredbe zagotavlja pravno podlago zanje, in sicer s tem, ko omenja odstopanja od načela, na podlagi katerega se odobrena proračunska sredstva lahko vključujejo v proračun EU samo, če se najprej sprejme zakonodajni akt; v primeru pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov se torej proračunska odločitev sprejme pred zakonodajno odločitvijo.
Article 49 (6) of the Financial Regulation provides for their legal basis, namely by mentioning the derogations to the principle under which appropriations can only be entered in the EU budget if a legal act has been adopted previously; in the case of PP/PA, a budgetary decision is therefore taken prior any legislative decision.
Finančna uredba izrecno določa naravo in namen obeh instrumentov:
Financial Regulation defines explicitly the nature and the purpose of these two instruments:
pilotni projekti so eksperimentalni projekti , namenjeni preskušanju izvedljivosti ukrepa in njegove uporabnosti.
PP are defined as schemes of an experimental nature designed to test the feasibility of an action and its usefulness.
Ustrezne odobritve za prevzem obveznosti se lahko vključijo v proračun samo dve zaporedni proračunski leti;
The relevant commitment appropriations may be entered in the budget for not more than two successive financial years ;
pripravljalni ukrepi so ukrepi na področjih uporabe Pogodbe ES in Pogodbe Euratom ter naslova VI PEU, namenjeni za pripravo predlogov za sprejetje prihodnjih ukrepov.
PA are defined as actions in the fields of application of the EC Treaty and the Euratom Treaty and of Title VI of the TEU, designed to prepare proposals with a view to the adoption of future actions.
Pri pripravljalnih ukrepih mora veljati skladen pristop, imajo pa lahko različne oblike.
The preparatory actions are to follow a coherent approach and may take various forms.
Zakonodajni postopek se mora končati pred koncem tretjega proračunskega leta.
The legislative procedure must be concluded before the end of the third financial year .
Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 podrobneje določa okvir in pravila za izvajanje pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov.
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 defines further the framework and the rules for implementation of PP and PA.
Točka D Priloge II medinstitucionalnega sporazuma določa, da bi lahko Komisija pravočasno ocenila izvedljivost sprememb, ki jih proračunski organ predvidi in ki povzročijo nove ali podaljšanje obstoječih pripravljalnih ukrepov/pilotnih projektov, obe veji proračunskega organa Komisijo do sredine junija obvestita o svojih namerah na tem področju, tako da na prvi obravnavi v Svetu že lahko steče prva razprava.
Point D of Annex II of the IIA provides that in order for the Commission to be able to assess in due time the implementability of amendments envisaged by the budgetary authority which create new preparatory actions/pilot projects or prolong existing ones, both arms of the budgetary authority will inform the Commission by mid-June of their intentions in this regards, so that a first discussion may already take place at the conciliation meeting of the Council's first reading .
Medinstitucionalni sporazum v zvezi z zgornjimi mejami določa, da se institucije strinjajo z omejitvijo skupnega zneska proračunskih sredstev za pilotne projekte na 40 milijonov UR v katerem koli proračunskem letu.
As regards the ceilings, the IIA stipulates that the institutions agree to limit the total amount of appropriations for pilot schemes to 40 million in any budget year.
Prav tako se strinjajo z omejitvijo skupnega zneska proračunskih sredstev za nove pripravljalne ukrepe na 50 milijonov EUR v katerem koli proračunskem letu in skupnega zneska proračunskih sredstev, za katerega se dejansko prevzamejo obveznosti za pripravljalne ukrepe, na 100 milijonov EUR.
They also agree to limit to 50 million the total amount of appropriations for new preparatory actions in any budgetary year, and to 100 million the total amount of appropriations actually committed for preparatory actions .
Spremembe po Lizbonski pogodbi
Changes following the Lisbon Treaty
Lizbonska pogodba ne uvaja določb, ki bi neposredno vplivale na pilotne projekte in pripravljalne ukrepe; treba pa je uvesti nova pravila za finančno uredbo zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe in za nov medinstitucionalni sporazum.
The Lisbon Treaty does not introduce any provisions that have a direct effect on PP & PA; nevertheless, new rules for the Financial regulation stemming from the entry into force of the Lisbon treaty and for a new IIA have to be introduced.
Komisija v svojem nedavno predlaganem svežnju sprememb medinstitucionalnega sporazuma in finančne uredbe spreminja okvir pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov:
In its recently proposed "package" on the amending of the IIA and the Financial regulation, the Commission modifies the frame for PP & PA:
- Priloga D medinstitucionalnega sporazuma se ne nanaša več na zgornje meje za pilotne projekte in pripravljalne ukrepe
- Annex D of the IIA does not make any more reference on the ceilings for PP & PA
- obe veji proračunskega organa se zavezujeta, da bosta do srede junija obvestili Komisijo o namenih glede pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov, tako da bo lahko prva razprava potekala že na junijskem trialogu;
- the two branches of the budgetary authority commit themselves to inform the Commission, by mid-June, on their intentions as regards PP & PA so that a first discussion could already take place at the June trilogue;
- člen 32 pravil za izvajanje finančne uredbe določa zgornje meje, ki so nespremenjene.
- Art 32 of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation provides for the ceilings, which are unchanged.
Poročevalci poudarjajo, da ti elementi ne prejudicirajo rezultata medinstitucionalnih pogajanj o spremembi medinstitucionalnega sporazuma in finančne uredbe.
Your rapporteurs stress that these elements do not prejudge the outcome of the interinstitutional negotiations on the amended IIA and Financial regulation.