natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Končno, upoštevajoč, da na vsem področju Skupnosti, ki se uporablja za kmetijstvo, veljajo natančne določbe glede dobrega počutja živali, varovanja okolja in standardov javnega zdravja, kar je zagotovljeno tudi z neposrednimi dohodkovnimi podporami, bi se finančni prispevki Skupnosti za promocijske ukrepe, namenjene ekološkemu kmetijstvu, morali povečati, ker uporaba teh standardov pri posameznih proizvajalcih približuje primarno proizvodnjo trajnostnim, ekološkim praksam.
Finally, bearing in mind the fact that all utilised agricultural area of the Community is subject to detailed provisions of animal welfare, environmental protection and public health standards which is also guaranteed through direct income support mechanisms, the level of Community financial contribution to promotion measures related to organic production schemes should be increased, as the application of these standards at the level of particular holdings renders the primary production closer to sustainable, organic practices.
Takšno povečanje bi se ujemalo tudi z nedavnimi političnimi odločitvami o sadju, zelenjavi in vinu.
Such increase would be also in line with recent political decisions with regard to fruit and vegetables and wine.
Zaradi odprave tržnih instrumentov postane kmetijska proizvodnja občutljiva v kriznih razmerah, ki jih povzročijo na primer podnebne motnje ali živalske bolezni.
The abolition of any market instruments renders the agricultural production susceptible to crisis situations caused by e.g. climate disturbances or animal diseases.
V teh primerih bi promocijske kampanje morale imeti večjo podporo Skupnosti.
In those cases promotion campaigns should receive stronger Community’s support.
Hkrati je treba sprejeti določbe za primerno ločevanje med ukrepi za izvajanje, povezanimi s tehničnimi vprašanji pri sprejemanju projektov organizacij predlagateljic, in vprašanji, kako strateško pristopiti k študijam prodajnih možnosti in izvoznih možnosti.
At the same time, provisions should be made for a proper distinction between the implementing measures related to technical issues of acceptance of projects submitted by proposing organisations and issues related to strategic approach with regard to market outlet studies and export opportunities.
Poročevalec bi tu rad opozoril na rezultate na področju promocije, ki so bili doseženi z nedavno reformo v zvezi s sadjem in zelenjavo.
The Rapporteur would like to recall at this place the results of the recent fruit and vegetables reform with regard to promotion.
S končnim kompromisom predsedstva je bila dosežena sprememba člena 5(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2826/2000, s katero je določeno, da je treba posebno pozornost posvetiti promociji, namenjeni otrokom in izobraževalnim ustanovam.
The final Presidency’s compromise provided for the modification to Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 saying that a special focus shall be given to promotion targeted at children in educational establishments.
Poleg tega je Svet v svoji deklaraciji o sistemskem uvajanju uživanja sadja v šole, ki je priložena besedilu reforme, povabil Komisijo, naj čim prej pripravi predlog za sistemsko uvajanje uživanja sadja v šole, ki bi temeljil na presoji vpliva njegovih koristnih učinkov, izvedljivosti in administrativnih stroškov (dok.
Additionally, in its declaration on school fruit scheme attached to the text of the reform, the Council invited the Commission “to come forward with a proposal for a school fruit scheme as soon as possible based on an impact assessment of the benefits, practicability and administrative costs involved” (doc.
Trenutno poenostavljanje horizontalnega promocijskega instrumenta se zdi ustrezen trenutek za to.
The current exercise of simplifying the horizontal promotion tool seems to be the most appropriate moment to do so.
o 23. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru nad izvajanjem zakonodaje Skupnosti (2005)
on the Commission's 23rd Annual report on monitoring the application of Community law (2005)
MNENJE Odbora za peticije ..........................................................................................11
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS...............................................................11
– ob upoštevanju 23. letnega poročila Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2006)0416 ),
– having regard to the Commission's 23rd Annual report on monitoring the application of Community law ( COM(2006)0416 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnih dokumentov osebja Komisije ( SEC(2006)0999 in 1005),
– having regard to the Commission's staff working papers ( SEC(2006)0999 and 1005),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Evropa rezultatov – uporaba prava skupnosti“ ( KOM(2007)0502 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication on “A Europe of results – Applying Community law” ( COM(2007)0502 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 45 in 112(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 45 and 112(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za peticije ( A6‑0462/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0462/2007 ),
A. ker učinkovitost politik EU v veliki meri določa njihovo izvajanje na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni; ker je treba strogo nadzirati, kako države članice spoštujejo pravo Skupnosti s strani držav članic, in to spremljati, da bi zagotovili zaželen pozitiven učinek prava na vsakodnevno življenje državljanov,
A. Whereas the effectiveness of EU policies is largely determined by their implementation at national, regional and local levels; whereas compliance with Community legislation by the Member States must be rigorously controlled and monitored in order to ensure that it has the desired positive effects on the daily lives of citizens,
B. ker število pritožb zaradi kršitev prava Skupnosti kaže, da evropski državljani igrajo pomembno vlogo pri njegovem izvajanju in da je sposobnost institucij EU, da ustrezno odgovorijo na skrbi državljanov, pomembna za verodostojnost Evropske unije,
B. Whereas the number of complaints relating to infringements of Community law shows that European citizens play a vital role in its application, and that the ability of the EU Institutions properly to address citizens' concerns is important for the credibility of the European Union,
C. ker lahko Komisija prilagodi načine za učinkovito izvajanje svojih nalog in uvede spremembe za boljšo uporabo prava Skupnosti,
C. Whereas the Commission may adapt the means it uses to carry out its mission effectively and make innovations designed to improve the application of Community law,
Letno poročilo za leto 2005 in nadaljevanje resolucije Parlamenta
The 2005 Annual report and the follow-up of Parliament's resolution
2. v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da priključitev desetih novih držav članic očitno ni vplivala na število registriranih kršitev, ter poziva Komisijo, naj da Parlamentu pojasnila in zagotovila, da to ni posledica pomanjkanja registracij pritožb ali/in pomanjkanja notranjih virov, ki se v Komisiji ukvarjajo s kršitvami;
Notes accordingly that the accession of 10 new Member States seems not to have had any impact on the number of registered infringements, and calls on the Commission to give Parliament some explanation and reassurance that this is not due to a lack of registration of complaints or/and to a lack of internal resources dealing with infringements within the Commission;
4. se zavezuje, da bo Komisijo podprl s povečanjem proračunskih sredstev za povečanje sredstev, kot zahteva večina ustreznih generalnih direktoratov;
Commits itself to support the Commission via increased budget appropriations for an increase of resources, as requested by most of the relevant Directorates-General;
6. meni, da je treba spodbujati izmenjavo najboljše prakse med državami, na primer v obliki paketnih sej in prenosnih delavnic, ki jih organizira Komisija, da bi omogočila uporabo prava Skupnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, kako bi lahko Parlament sodeloval v tovrstnih postopkih;
Considers that the sharing of best practices between the Member States, for example in the form of package meetings and transposition workshops organised by the Commission to facilitate the application of Community law, should be encouraged; calls on the Commission to consider means of involving Parliament in such processes;
8. pozdravlja prvo vključitev podrobnosti o posebni in natančni obravnavi kršitev, povezanih s peticijami, v letno poročilo in z njim povezane priloge;
Welcomes the inclusion in the Annual Report and its related annexes for the first time of particulars of the specific and detailed treatment of infringements relating to petitions;
12. poziva države članice, naj presežejo povsem formalen prenos zakonodaje Skupnosti in se, kolikor je mogoče, izognejo razdrobljenemu prenosu direktiv, da zakonodaja postane preprostejša in preglednejša;
Calls on the Member States to go beyond a purely formal transposition of Community legislation and to avoid, as far as possible, the fragmentary transposition of directives with a view to making legislation simpler and more transparent;
Sporočilo Komisije iz leta 2007 „Evropa rezultatov – uporaba prava skupnosti“
The Commission's 2007 Communication on "A Europe of results – Applying Community law"
2. ; spodbuja Komisijo, naj s spremljanjem obveznosti iz tega sporočila doseže konkretne in vidne rezultate ter naj Parlament ves čas obvešča o teh rezultatih;
2. ; encourages the Commission to achieve concrete and visible results through the following-up of the commitments listed in that Communication and to keep Parliament constantly informed on those results;
– naj jasno opredeli primere, za katere se bo uporabljala nova metoda;
– to clearly define the cases to which the new method will apply;
– naj potrdi, da nova delovna metoda ni mehanizem, ki nadomešča postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev;
- to confirm that the new working method is not an alternative mechanism to the infringement procedures;
– naj zagotovi, da nova metoda ne bo dodatno odložila začetka postopka za ugotavljanje kršitve, ki je že tako izjemno dolgotrajen in nedoločen, ter naj ne popušča v odnosu do držav članic v zvezi s spoštovanjem rokov, ki jih Komisija določi, da bi našla rešitev za državljane;
– to guarantee that the new method will not further delay the initiation of an infringement procedure the duration of which is already extremely lengthy and indeterminate, as well as to show no indulgence vis-à-vis Member States when it comes to meeting the deadlines fixed by the Commission itself in order to find a solution for the citizen;
– naj bolj jasno opredeli trenutek registracije pritožb po novi metodi (pred odzivom zadevne države članice ali po njem) in določi, kdo naj sprejme odločitev, da se neka pritožba registrira; naj zagotovi spoštovanje načela kolegialnosti znotraj Komisije pri registraciji pritožbe;
– to clarify the moment of the registration of complaints under the new method (before or after the reaction of the Member State concerned) and to indicate who is to take the decision to register a given complaint; to guarantee that the principle of collegiality within the Commission will be respected when registering a complaint;
– naj opredeli, kdo bo zagotovil odgovor pritožniku (Komisija ali država članica);
– to specify who is to provide an answer to the complainant (the Commission or the Member State);
– naj obvesti Parlament o posebnih ukrepih, ki jih Komisija namerava sprejeti, da bi zagotovila, da bo – v prehodnem obdobju, pred popolnim izvajanjem novega sistema, in v primeru, da novi sistem ne bo prinesel pričakovanih rezultatov – v celoti uresničevala svojo vlogo varuha pogodbe;
– to inform Parliament about the specific measures the Commission intends to take in order to guarantee that, during the transitional period leading up to full implementation of the new system and in the event that the new system does not deliver the expected results, it will fully perform its role as guardian of the Treaty;
23. ker peticije in pritožbe državljanov in podjetij olajšajo odkritje velikega števila kršitev ter da bi se izognili zmedi pri navezovanju stikov z raznimi organi, ki rešujejo probleme, poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost jasnega označevanja ali ustanovitve spletne informacijske točke, kjer bi bilo vse na enem mestu, da bi pomagala državljanom;
Given that petitions and complaints from citizens and businesses facilitate the detection of a very substantial number of infringements, and in order to avoid confusion in contacting the various problem-solving bodies, urges the Commission to investigate the possibility of clear signposting or the creation of an on-line one-stop-shop in order to assist citizens;
12. ; pozdravlja novo zavezo Komisije, da bo „svoje ukrepanje glede teh prednostnih nalog po letu 2008 opisala in pojasnila v svojih letnih poročilih“
12. ; welcomes its new commitment to “describe and explain its action on these priorities in its annual reports, from 2008”
28. poziva Komisijo, naj obsežno uporablja načelo, da mora biti vsa korespondenca, za katero se lahko izkaže, da vsebuje pritožbo glede dejanske kršitve prava Skupnosti, registrirana kot pritožba, razen v izjemnih okoliščinah iz točke 3 priloge sporočila o odnosih z pritožnikom v zvezi s kršitvami prava Skupnosti
Urges the Commission to extensively apply the principle that all correspondence which is likely to denounce a real violation of Community law should be registered as a complaint, unless it falls within the exceptional circumstances referred to in point 3 of the Annex to the Communication on “Relations with the complainant in respect of infringements of Community law”
KOM(2002)0141 . ; ugotavlja, da je evropski varuh človekovih pravic nedavno ugotovil, da je Komisija odgovorna za nepravilnost, ker ni registrirala pritožbe v skladu s tem sporočilom; poziva Komisijo, naj parlament obvešča in se z njim posvetuje o vseh spremembah izrednih meril za neregistracijo pritožb;
COM(2002)0141 . ; notes that the European Ombudsman has recently found the Commission responsible for “maladministration” for not having registered a complaint in accordance with that Communication; urges the Commission to inform and consult Parliament on any changes in the exceptional criteria for the non-registration of complaints;
31. pozdravlja zavezo Komisije, da bo zagotovila povzetek informacij o vseh fazah postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev, od formalnega opomina dalje; meni, da bi morala Komisija, zaradi preglednosti in boljše uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti, na nacionalnih sodiščih objaviti vsebino in časovno razporeditev stikov z državami članicami, ko se zadevna vprašanja ne preiskujejo več;
Welcomes the Commission's commitment to provide summary information on all stages of infringement proceedings from the letter of formal notice as they progress; considers that, in the interests of transparency and better application of Community law in the national courts, the Commission should make available the content and timing of contacts with Member States once the relevant issues are no longer under investigation;
Sporočilo Komisije o sodelovanju med Komisijo in nacionalnimi sodišči držav članic EU pri uporabi členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe o ES (UL C 101, 27.4.2004, str.
Commission Notice on the co-operation between the Commission and the courts of the EU Member States in the application of Articles 81 and 82 EC (OJ C 101, 27.4.2004, p.
54) odstavki od 17 do 20. ;
54), paragraphs 17 to 20. ;
Vloga Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov pri uporabi prava EU
The role of the European Parliament and national parliaments in the application of EU law
34. ugotavlja, da zadržki Komisije glede zagotavljanja natančnih informacij o vprašanjih, kjer so bili sproženi postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, močno zmanjšujejo javni interes za te seje in njihovo učinkovitost; parlamentarne odbore poziva, naj po potrebi predvidijo vključitev predstavnikov ustreznih držav članic ali Sveta na seznam povabljenih na seje o uporabi prava Skupnosti;
Notices, however, that the Commission's reluctance to provide precise information on the issues where infringement proceedings have started greatly reduces public interest in, and the effectiveness of, these sessions; calls on Parliament's committees to envisage, where appropriate, including representatives of the relevant Member States or of the Council in the list of invitees to the sessions on the application of Community law;
36. poziva k večjemu sodelovanju med nacionalnimi parlamenti in Evropskim parlamentom ter njihovimi poslanci, da bi spodbudili in povečali učinkovit nadzor nad evropskimi zadevami na nacionalni ravni; meni, da imajo nacionalni parlamenti pomembno vlogo pri nadzoru nad uporabo prava Skupnosti, s čimer pomagajo krepiti demokratično legitimnost Evropske unije in jo približati državljanom;
Calls for increased cooperation between national parliaments and the European Parliament and their respective parliamentarians, in order to promote and increase effective scrutiny of European matters at national level; considers that national parliaments have a valuable role to play in monitoring the application of Community law, thus helping to strengthen the democratic legitimacy of the European Union and bring it closer to the citizens;
38. ugotavlja, da imajo nacionalna sodišča bistveno vlogo pri uporabi prava Skupnosti in v celoti podpira prizadevanja Komisije, da opredeli dodatno usposabljanje za nacionalne sodnike, pravosodne delavce in uradnike v nacionalnih organih;
Notes that national courts play an essential role in applying Community law and fully supports the Commission's efforts to identify supplementary training for national judges, legal practitioners and officials within the national authorities;
S tem poročilom se ocenjuje nadzor Komisije nad uporabo prava Skupnosti v letu 2005.
This report evaluates the Commission's monitoring of the application of Community law in 2005.
Analizira se tudi sporočilo „Evropa rezultatov – uporaba prava skupnosti“ ( KOM(2007)0502 ), ki ga je nedavno sprejela Komisija.
It also analyses the Communication on "A Europe of results - Applying Community law" COM(2007)0502 that the Commission adopted recently.
Poročilo je rezultat obsežnih srečanj poročevalke s komisarji, odgovornimi za uporabo prava Skupnosti na področjih, za katera so pristojni.
The report is the result of extensive meetings the rapporteur held with the Commissioners responsible for the application of Community law in their sectors of competence.
Poleg tega so se ohranili obsežni stiki z različnimi službami Komisije, ki se ukvarjajo z upravljanjem in izvrševanjem prava Skupnosti.
Moreover, extensive contacts were maintained with the different services of the Commission dealing with the management and the enforcement of Community law.
V okviru tega poročila je bila 3. maja 2007 organizirana javna predstavitev o uporabi prava Skupnosti, na kateri so predstavniki nacionalnih parlamentov, nacionalni sodniki, pravosodni delavci in predstavniki nacionalnih vlad izmenjali izkušnje in znanje ter prispevali k zasnovi poročila.
In the framework of this report, a public hearing on the application of Community law was organised on 3 May 2007, where representatives of national parliaments, national judges, practitioners and representatives of national governments shared their experience and expertise and contributed to the conceptualisation of the report.
Poročilo črpa tudi iz primerjalne študije o prenosu prava ES v države članice, ki jo je pripravil oddelek za oblikovanje politik Evropskega parlamenta v sodelovanju z Evropskim centrom za parlamentarne raziskave in dokumentacijo.
The report also draws on a Comparative study on the transposition of EC law in the Member Sates prepared by the Policy Department of the European Parliament in co-operation with the European Centre for Parliamentary Research and Documentation.
Poročilo upošteva izkušnje drugih parlamentarnih odborov pri uporabi prava Skupnosti in priznava pomembno vlogo, ki bi jo moral imeti Evropski parlament pri pravilni uporabi prava ES.
The report takes into account the experience of other parliamentary committees in the application of Community law and recognises the important role the European Parliament should play in contributing to the correct application of the EC law.
MNENJE Odbora za peticije
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS
o nadzoru nad izvajanjem zakonodaje Skupnosti (2005) - 23. letno poročilo
on monitoring the application of Community Law (2005) – 23rd annual report
Odbor za peticije poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Petitions calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
1. pozdravlja prvo vključitev podrobnosti o posebni in natančni obravnavi kršitev, povezanih s peticijami, v letno poročilo in z njim povezane priloge; se strinja s Komisijo, da peticije predstavljajo pomemben vir informacij pri ugotavljanju kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti; odobrava namero, ki so jo izrazili pri Komisiji, da bodo vprašanjem, obravnavanim v letnih poročilih, pripisali večji strateški značaj;
Welcomes the inclusion in the Annual Report and its related annexes for the first time of particulars of the specific and detailed treatment of infringements relating to petitions; agrees with the Commission that petitions represent a valuable source of information in detecting violations of Community law; welcomes the Commission's stated intention to increase the strategic nature of the issues discussed in its Annual Reports;
3. odobrava zavezo Komisije, da bo v prihodnje zakonodajne predloge praviloma vključevala povzetke za državljane ter ostale prebivalce, in zahteva konkretne primere takšnih povzetkov ter pojasnilo, da ti povzetki tvorijo sestavni del zadevnega pravnega akta, kot zahteva 19. člen resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. maja 2006 o 21. in 22. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti (2003 in 2004)
Welcomes the Commission's commitment as a rule to include citizens' or peoples' summaries in future legislative proposals and requests concrete examples of such summaries as well as clarification that they form an integral part of the legal act concerned, as called for in paragraph 19 of Parliament's resolution of 16 May 2006 on the Commission's 21st and 22nd Annual reports on monitoring the application of Community law (2003 and 2004)
5. opozarja na zavezo Sveta, da bo države članice spodbujal, naj pripravijo in objavijo preglednice, ki prikazujejo ujemanje med direktivami in nacionalnimi ukrepi za prenos
Recalls the commitment on the part of the Council to encourage the Member States to draw up and publicise tables illustrating the correlation between directives and domestic transposition measures
Medinstitucionalni sporazum o boljši pravni ureditvi (UL C 321, 31.12.2003, str.
Interinstitutional Agreement on better lawmaking (OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
Glej Sporočilo Komisije KOM(2006)0689 . ; podpira stalna prizadevanja Komisije v zvezi s tem vprašanjem;
See also Commission Communication COM(2006)0689 . ; supports the Commission's continuing efforts to that end;
Sporočilo Komisije za leto 2007 „Evropa rezultatov - uporaba prava Skupnosti“
The Commission's 2007 Communication on "A Europe of Results – Applying Community Law"
Sporočilo Komisije o sodelovanju med Komisijo in nacionalnimi sodišči v zvezi z izvajanjem členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe o ES (UL C 101, 27.4.2004, str.
Commission Notice on the co-operation between the Commission and the courts of the EU Member States in the application of Articles 81 and 82 EC (OJ C 101, 27.4.2004, p.
54) odstavki 17–20. ;
54), paragraphs 17 to 20. ;
– (glede datotek, prenesenih v države članice) za znižanje ravni sodelovanja z Evropskim parlamentom, ki zlasti prek Odbora za peticije predstavlja prebivalce posameznih držav, združene v Skupnosti;
- as regards files which are transmitted to the Member States, lead to a reduced level of cooperation with the European Parliament, which represents the peoples of the States brought together in the Community, and in particular through its Committee on Petitions;