natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. junija 2008 o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije in evropske varnostne in obrambne politike
– having regard to its resolution of 5 June 2008 on the implementation of the European Security Strategy and ESDP
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0255 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0255 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. julija 2008 o vesolju in varnosti
– having regard to its resolution of 10 July 2008 on space and security
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0365 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0365 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve (A6 0032/2009),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0032/2009 ),
2. se zaveda, da bi si morala EU prizadevati za te cilje z večstranskim sodelovanjem v mednarodnih organizacijah, predvsem v Združenih narodih, in s partnerstvi z drugimi ključnimi akterji v skladu z Ustanovno listino Združenih narodov, načeli helsinške sklepne listine in cilji pariške listine;
Recognises the need for the EU to pursue these objectives through multilateral cooperation in international organisations, above all the United Nations, and through partnerships with other key actors in accordance with the United Nations Charter, the principles of the Helsinki Final Act and the objectives of the Paris Charter;
6. poudarja, da je združevanje prizadevanj in zmogljivosti na ravni EU bistveno za odpravljanje skupnih posledic vse večjih stroškov za obrambno opremo in obstoječih omejitev izdatkov za obrambo;
Stresses that the pooling of efforts and capabilities at the EU level is crucial in overcoming the combined effects of the increasing costs of defence equipment and the existing limits on defence spending;
9. meni, da morata biti dopolnjena evropska varnostna strategija in prihodnji strateški koncept Nata skladna, kar se mora odražati v deklaraciji, ki bo sprejeta na vrhu Nata v Strasbourgu in Kehlu aprila 2009;
Considers that the updated ESS and the future NATO Strategic Concept should be mutually coherent and that this should be reflected in the Declaration which will be adopted by the NATO summit in Strasbourg/Kehl in April 2009;
11. odobrava poročilo Sveta o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije; vendar ugotavlja, da večina ciljev evropske varnostne strategije iz leta 2003 ni bila izpolnjena, zaradi česar mora Evropska unija, okrepljena z lizbonsko pogodbo, odločneje spodbujati legitimnost, preglednost in učinkovitost institucij svetovnega upravljanja;
Welcomes the Council's report on the implementation of the ESS; notes, however, that because many of the goals of the ESS in 2003 remain largely unfulfilled, the European Union – reinforced by the Treaty of Lisbon – should play a more decisive role in boosting the legitimacy, transparency and effectiveness of the institutions of global governance;
Evropski varnostni interesi
European s ecurity i nterests
16. meni, da varnostni interesi Unije poleg izzivov, ki so opredeljeni v evropski varnostni strategiji sprejeti leta 2003, vključujejo varnost njenih državljanov in njenih interesov v Evropski uniji in zunaj nje, varnost sosednjih držav in varovanje zunanjih meja in ključne infrastrukture, izboljšanje kibernetske varnosti, zanesljivo oskrbo z energijo in varne plovne poti, zaščito pridobitev iz vesoljskih dejavnosti in varstvo pred posledicami podnebnih sprememb;
Is of the opinion that, in addition to the challenges identified in the ESS as adopted in 2003, the security interests of the Union include the protection of its citizens and its interests inside the EU as well as abroad, the security of its neighbourhood and the protection of its external borders and critical infrastructure, as well as the improvement of its cyber security, the security of energy supply and sea lanes, the protection of its space assets and protection against the consequences of climate change;
Evropske varnostne ambicije
European s ecurity a mbitions
20. ugotavlja, da je evropska varnostna strategija iz leta 2003 opozorila na osrednje grožnje za Evropsko unijo (terorizem, širjenje orožja za množično uničevanje, regionalni konflikti, propad države in organizirani kriminal) in opredelila strateške cilje, ki so postali osnova za podstrategije;
Notes that the 2003 ESS highlights the main threats faced by the European Union (terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, regional conflicts, state failure and organised crime) and identifies strategic objectives, which have become the basis for substrategies;
– kibernetska varnost;
– cyber security;
– zanesljiva oskrba z energijo, vključno z oskrbo Evrope;
– energy security, including supplies to Europe;
– nerešeni regionalni spori v soseščini EU;
– unresolved regional disputes in the EU’s neighbourhood;
– izzivi na afriški celini;
– challenges on the African continent;
– posledice podnebnih sprememb;
– consequences of climate change;
– tekmovanje za naravne vire;
– competition for natural resources;
– projekti za krepitev civilnih in vojaških zmogljivosti;
– projects to strengthen civilian and military capabilities;
– pomen vesolja za skupno varnost;
– the importance of space for our common security;
– pomorska varnost;
– maritime security;
– dve večji operaciji za stabilizacijo in obnovo s prilagojeno civilno komponento in z največ 10 000 vojakov vsaj dve leti;
– two major stabilisation and reconstruction operations, with a suitable civilian component, supported by a maximum of 10 000 men for at least two years;
– dve časovno omejeni operaciji hitrega odziva med drugim z uporabo bojnih skupin EU;
– two rapid response operations of limited duration using inter alia the EU's Battlegroups;
– operacije evakuacije evropskih državljanov v sili (v manj kot desetih dneh), ob upoštevanju vodilne vloge vsake evropske članice v odnosu do svojih državljanov ter ob uporabi koncepta vodilne države za konzularne zadeve;
– an emergency operation for the evacuation of European nationals (in less than ten days), bearing in mind the primary role of each Member State as regards its nationals and making use of the consular lead State concept;
– misije za nadzor/onemogočanje na morju ali v zraku;
– a maritime or air surveillance/interdiction mission;
– civilno-vojaško operacijo za humanitarno pomoč, ki traja največ 90 dni;
– a civilian-military humanitarian assistance operation lasting up to 90 days;
– okoli dvanajst civilnih misij EVOP različnih oblik (med drugim policijskih misij, misij za krepitev pravne države, za civilno upravo, misij za civilno zaščito, reformo varnostnega sektorja ali opazovanje), tudi v primerih hitrega odziva, vključno z večjo misijo (v kateri bi sodelovalo do 3 000 strokovnjakov), ki bi lahko trajala več let;
– around a dozen ESDP civilian missions (including inter alia police, rule of law, civil administration, civil protection, security sector reform and observation missions) of varying formats, operating inter alia in a rapid reaction situation, including a major mission (potentially involving up to 3 000 experts) which could last several years;
Te so:
Further deplores the fact that demands made in Parliament’s previous reports on the ESS and the ESDP have not been considered by the Council, above all:
– - opredelitev skupnih varnostnih interesov,
– the definition of common European security interests,
– - opredelitev meril za začetek misij EVOP,
– the definition of criteria for the launching of ESDP missions,
– - predlogi za novo partnerstvo med EU in Natom,
– proposals for a new EU-NATO partnership,
– obravnava nacionalnih ugovorov;
– tackling the issue of national “caveats”;
26. obžaluje, da po letu 2003 pri krepitvi obrambnega sodelovanja v EU ni bilo večjega napredka; zato ponovno poziva k pripravi bele knjige o evropski varnosti in obrambi kot orodja za sprožitev široke javne razprave ter da se zagotovi učinkovito izvajanje evropskem varnostne strategije;
Regrets the relative lack of progress since 2003 in strengthening EU cooperation in defence; therefore calls once again for a White Paper to be drawn up on European s ecurity and d efence as a tool to be used to initiate a wide -ranging public debate and to ensure that the ESS is implemented in an efficient way;
Odnosi z Rusijo
Relationship with Russia
32. odobrava sklep Sveta z dne 2. decembra 2008, da določi neodvisno komisijo pod vodstvom Evropske unije, da preuči vzroke vojne v Gruziji;
Welcomes the Council's decision of 2 December 2008 to establish an independent commission headed by the European Union to examine the causes of the conflict in Georgia;
36. opozarja, da je Rusija zaradi svojega geopolitičnega položaja, vojaške sile, politične teže, energetskih bogastev in gospodarskega potenciala za Evropo strateško pomembna;
Points out that, due to its geopolitical position, its military power and political weight, its energy wealth and its economic potential, Russia is of strategic importance for Europe;
39. poudarja tudi, da se največ pozornosti namenja vojaški razsežnosti EVOP, zaradi česar je napredek na področju civilnih zmogljivosti in preprečevanja konfliktov prepočasen, zato morata Svet in Komisija nujno dati nov zagon na tem področju;
Also emphasises that, with most of the emphasis being placed on the military dimension of the ESDP, progress in the area of civil capabilities and conflict prevention is far too slow and that, in this area, new dynamics need to be proposed as a matter of urgency by both the Council and the Commission;
42. poudarja, da so potrebe glede zmogljivosti pri delovanju oboroženih sil, nadzoru na mejah, zaščiti kritične infrastrukture in kriznem upravljanju pogosto tehnološko zelo podobne ali celo enake; poudarja, da se s tem odpirajo nove priložnosti za izkoristek sinergij in povečanje interoperabilnost med oboroženimi in varnostnimi silami;
Stresses that capability needs are often technologically very similar or even identical for armed forces operations, border surveillance, protection of critical infrastructure and disaster management; emphasises that this creates new opportunities to exploit synergies and enhance interoperability between armed forces and security forces;
48. podpira zamisel o evropskem statutu za vojake v okviru usklajenih oboroženih sil Evrope, ki bi urejal standarde usposabljanja, operativno doktrino in svobodo pri operativnem ukrepanju, vprašanja dolžnosti in pravic, raven kakovosti opreme, zdravstveno oskrbo in socialno varnost v primeru smrti, poškodbe ali nezmožnosti za delo;
Approves the idea of a European statute for soldiers within the framework of SAFE governing training standards, operational doctrine and freedom of operational action, issues relating to duties and rights, as well as the level of equipment quality, medical care and social security arrangements in the event of death, injury or incapacity;
Potreba po novih strukturah
The need for new structures
52. pozdravlja tudi sklep Evropskega sveta o vzpostavitvi neformalne skupine EU in NATA na visoki ravni, ki bo zadolžena za pragmatično krepitev sodelovanja med obema organizacijama;
Likewise welcomes the decision of the European Council to set up an informal EU-NATO high-level group which will be tasked with strengthening cooperation between the two organisations in a pragmatic manner;
56. v zvezi s tem pozdravlja sprejetje skupnega stališča Sveta 2008/944/SZVP z dne 8. decembra 2008, ki opredeljuje skupna pravila glede nadzora izvoza vojaške tehnologije in opreme
Welcomes in this connection the adoption of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment
UL L 335, 13.12.2008, str.
OJ L 335, 13.12.2008, p.
99. , ki spreminja pravila Evropske unije o ravnanju pri izvozu orožja v pravno zavezujoč instrument; pozdravlja tudi dejstvo, da lahko nacionalne države še naprej individualno sprejemajo strožje ukrepe;
99. , which transforms the Code of Conduct on Arms Exports into a legally binding instrument; furthermore, welcomes the fact that EU Member States remain free to adopt more stringent measures on an individual basis;
Potreba po novem duhu
The need for a new spirit
61. odločno podpira uspešne evropske programe, kot je Eurofighter, ki bo v prihodnjih desetletjih bistveni sestavni del zmogljivosti petih evropskih zračnih sil, kar se tiče lovskih letal; zato meni, da bi morale države članice EU spodbujati in podpirati takšne pobude;
Strongly supports successful European programmes such as the Eurofighter, which will serve as the backbone of the fighter capability of five European air forces in the coming decades; considers, for this reason, that the EU Member States should encourage and support such initiatives;
V poročilu ni najti zahteve po miru, namesto tega se osredotoča na priprave za militarizacijo Evropske unije.
The report lacks the requirements for peace, focusing instead on preparation for militarisation of the EU.
Obsojamo, da se v poročilu zagovarja
We condemn the fact that the report advocates:
– naj Evropska unija brani svoje interese v svetu z vojaškimi sredstvi, na primer, da si zagotovi oskrbo z energijo,
- that the EU defends its interests around the world with military means, e.g. to secure the supply of energy;
– nameren poskus prekršitve političnega tabuja, da se ne govori o „evropskih varnostnih interesih“,
- the deliberate attempt to break the political taboo to speak of an "European security interest"
– nadaljnja militarizacija Evropske unije, na primer stalna razpoložljivost 60.000 vojakov,
- the further militarisation of the EU, e.g. to make 60 000 soldiers permanently available;
– vzpostavitev evropskega obrambnega in varnostnega trga,
- the establishment of a European Defence and Security Market;
– povečanje sredstev Skupnosti za raziskave na področju varnosti,
- the increase in Community funding for security research;
– združevanje uporabe civilnih in vojaških sredstev in zmogljivosti,
- to combine the use of both civil and military assets and capabilities;
– uporaba Galilea in GMES za varnost in obrambo,
- the use of Galileo and GMES for security and defence;
– zaščita pridobitev iz vesoljskih dejavnosti EU in posledična militarizacija vesolja,
- the protection of EU space assets and therefore a militarisation of space;
– kritika Rusije zaradi njenega posredovanja v vojni na Kavkazu, ne da bi se omenilo, da je vojno začela Gruzija,
- to criticise Russia for its response in the war in the Caucasus without mentioning that the war was started by Georgia;
– kritika Rusije zaradi priznanja Južne Osetije in Abhazije, ne da bi se omenilo, da so številne evropske države priznale Kosovo, kar je bilo prav tako v nasprotju z mednarodnim pravom.
- to criticise Russia for the recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia without mentioning the recognition of Kosovo by many European states which is equally contrary to international law;
civilno EU,
- a civilian EU;
da se vesolje ne
- no militari
ustanovitev agencije EU za razorožitev,da se vojaški izdatki namesto tega uporabijo za civilne namene.
- establishment of an EU disarmament agency;- military expenditure to be used instead for civilian purposes.
o vlogi Nata v varnostnem ustroju EU
on the role of NATO in the security architecture of the EU
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE........................................................................................................15
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................15
– ob upoštevanju skupne deklaracije EU-Nato s 16. decembra 2002,
– having regard to the EU-NATO Joint Declaration of 16 December 2002,
– ob upoštevanju listine Združenih narodov,
– having regard to the Charter of the United Nations,
– ob upoštevanju severnoatlantske pogodbe, ki je bila podpisana v Washingtonu 4. aprila 1949,
– having regard to the North Atlantic Treaty, signed in Washington on 4 April 1949,
– ob upoštevanju Lizbonske pogodbe, ki je bila podpisana 13. decembra 2007 in ki jo je ratificirala velika večina držav članic EU,
– having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 and ratified by the great majority of the EU Member States,
– ob upoštevanju celostnega okvira za stalne odnose med EU in Natom, ki sta ga 17. marca 2003 sklenila generalni sekretar Sveta EU/visoki predstavnik za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko in generalni sekretar Nata,
– having regard to the comprehensive framework for EU-NATO permanent relations, concluded by the EU Council Secretary-General/High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the NATO Secretary General on 17 March 2003,
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije vrha Severnoatlantskega sveta v Bukarešti 3. aprila 2008,
– having regard to the Summit Declaration of the North Atlantic Council (NAC) issued in Bucharest on 3 April 2008,
– ob upoštevanju poročil, ki jih je o evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki (EVOP) 11. decembra in 16. junija 2007 objavilo predsedstvo Sveta EU,
– having regard to the reports on the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) issued by the EU Council Presidency on 11 December 2007 and 16 June 2008,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 14. aprila 2005 o evropski varnostni strategiji (EVS)
– having regard to its resolutions of 14 April 2005 on the ESS
580. , s 16. novembra 2006 o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije v okviru EVOP
580. , of 16 November 2006 on the implementation of the ESS in the context of the ESDP
334. , s 25. aprila 2007 o čezatlantskih odnosih
334. , of 25 April 2007 on transatlantic relations
UL C 74 E, 20.03.2008, str.
OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p.
670. , s 5. junija 2008 o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije in evropske varnostne in obrambne politike (EVOP)
670. , of 5 June 2008 on the implementation of the European Security Strategy and ESDP
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0255 . in s 5. junija 2008 o prihodnjem vrhu EU-ZDA
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0255 . and of 5 June 2008 on the forthcoming EU-US Summit
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0256 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0256 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0033/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0033/2009 ),
A. ker sta EU in Nato osnovana na skupnih vrednotah svobode, demokracije, človekovih pravic in načel pravne države, in ker od svojega nastanka služita preprečevanju vojn na evropskem ozemlju,
A. whereas the EU and NATO are founded on shared values of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, and throughout their existence have served to avoid wars on European territory,
B . ker ima v skladu z listino Združenih narodov vso odgovornost za mednarodni mir in varnost varnostni svet ZN; ker listina daje pravno podlago za ustanovitev Nata; ker so države članice Nata s podpisom sevetnoatlantske pogodbe potrdile svojo vero v namene in načela listine ter se s tem zavezale k temu, da se bodo v mednarodnih odnosih izogibale uporabi sile ali grožnji z njo na kakršen koli način, ki ne bi bil skladen z nameni Združenih narodov,
B . whereas according to the UN Charter the overall responsibility for international peace and security lies with the UN Security Council; whereas the Charter provides the legal basis for the creation of NATO; whereas, by signing the North Atlantic Treaty, NATO member states affirmed their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter, committing themselves to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations,
C. ker države članice EU priznavajo, da je sistem ZN temeljni okvir za mednarodne odnose; ker ostajajo zavezane k ohranjanju miru in krepitvi mednarodne varnosti v skladu z načeli listine Združenih narodov, pa tudi načeli helsinške sklepne listine in cilji pariške listine, in k razvoju in utrditvi demokracije in pravne države, spoštovanju človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin; ker so države članice EU določile kot prednostne ukrepe za reformo in okrepitev Organizacije združenih narodov, da bi bila sposobna izpolnjevati svoje naloge in učinkovitega ukrepanja pri reševanju svetovnih vprašanj ter odziva na ključne grožnje,
C. whereas the EU Member States recognise in the UN system the fundamental framework for international relations; whereas they remain committed to the preservation of peace and the strengthening of international security, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, as well as the principles of the Helsinki Final Act and the objectives of the Paris Charter, and to the development and consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; whereas the EU Member States have set as a priority measures to reform and strengthen the United Nations Organization in order to make it capable of fulfilling its responsibilities and acting effectively in providing solutions to global challenges and responding to key threats,
D. ker je Nato jedro evropske varnosti in ker ima EU zadosten potencial za podporo njegovih dejavnosti, tako da bosta okrepitev evropskih obrambnih zmogljivosti in poglobljeno sodelovanje koristila obema organizacijama,
D. whereas NATO forms the core of European security and the EU has sufficient potential to support its activities, so that strengthening the European defence capabilities and deepening cooperation will benefit both organisations,
E. ker je Nato medvladna organizacija demokratičnih narodov, v kateri civilisti sprejemajo odločitve, ki jih vojaki izvršujejo,
E. whereas NATO is an intergovernmental organisation of democratic nations, in which civilians decide and the military executes,
F. ker je 94 % prebivalstva EU državljanov držav članic Nata, 21 držav članic EU od skupaj 27 je članic Nata, 21 od 26 članic Nata pa je članic EU, Turčija, ki je že dolgo članica Nata, pa je kandidatka za pristop k EU,
F. whereas 94 per cent of the EU population are citizens of NATO member states, 21 EU Member States out of 27 are NATO allies, 21 NATO allies out of 26 are EU Member States and Turkey, a long-standing NATO ally, is a candidate for accession to the EU,
G. ker je v letih 2007 in 2008 Evropski svet sprejel pomembne odločitve na področju evropske varnostne in obrambne politike, da bi se dodatno izboljšale njene operativne zmogljivosti; ker bo težko pričakovani začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe uvedel velike spremembe na področju EVOP, s tem bo pa evropsko sodelovanje na tem področju postalo doslednejše in učinkovitejše,
G. whereas in 2007 and 2008 the European Council took important decisions in the field of the ESDP with the aim of further improving its operational capabilities; whereas the keenly awaited entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon will introduce major innovations in the field of the ESDP, making European cooperation more coherent and efficient in that field,
H. ker morata EU in Nato okrepiti svoje sodelovanje in ker bi morala omogočati večjo maksimizacijo sredstev obeh organizacij ter zagotoviti učinkovito sodelovanje s končanjem institucionalnih nesoglasij,
H. whereas EU and NATO must improve their cooperation and should allow for greater maximisation of the assets of both organisations and ensure effective cooperation by putting an end to institutional bickering,
I. ker so – kljub temu, da je Nato forum za razprave in pričakovana izbira za skupne vojaške operacije evropskih in ameriških zaveznikov – za mir in varnost dokončno odgovorni Združeni narodi,
I. whereas although NATO is currently the forum for discussion and the expected choice for a joint military operation involving the European and American allies, the ultimate responsibility for peace and security lies with the United Nations,
J. ker so čete in oprema, dodeljeni misijam EVOP, bolj ali manj enaki kot tisti, ki so dodeljeni operacijam Nata,
J. whereas troops and equipment committed to ESDP missions are more or less the same as those committed to NATO operations,
K. ker Nato kot tak ne sodeluje v operacijah EVOP; ker se EU pri teh operacijah odloča, ali bo preko t.i. dogovorov „Berlin plus“ zaprosila za vire in zmogljivosti Nata,
K. whereas NATO as a whole is not engaged in ESDP operations; whereas the EU, in undertaking such an operation, will choose whether or not to have recourse to NATO assets and capabilities, through the so-called “Berlin plus” arrangements,