natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1. , ki državam članicam, ki uporabljajo analizo tveganja, omogoča, da določijo 5-odstotno stopnjo pregledov na državo članico namesto na carinski urad; vendar obžaluje, da odgovori Komisije glede prihodnjih predlogov ne vključujejo jasnega časovnega okvira, zlasti glede na to, da je do odprave izvoznih nadomestil še zelo malo časa;
1. , which enables Member States which apply risk analysis to set the control rate to 5% per Member State instead of per customs office; regrets however the lack of a clear timeline in the Commission's replies regarding its future proposals, given the short time prior to the phasing-out of export refunds;
303. obžaluje številne pomanjkljivosti, ki zmanjšujejo učinkovitost fizičnih pregledov, zlasti predvidljivost pregledov, pogoste preglede izvoznega blaga z nizkim tveganjem in nizko vrednostjo ter metode, ki se uporabljajo pri pregledu pošiljk razsutega tovora;
303.Deplores the several weaknesses reducing the effectiveness of physical checks, in particular the predictability of checks, the high number of low value and low risk exports being checked as well as the method used to check bulk shipments of goods;
304. kar zadeva preglede zamenjave, obžaluje nenatančnost pregledov in različne ocene držav članic o tem, koliko pregledov je treba opraviti;
304.As far as substitution checks are concerned, regrets that the checks were not detailed enough and that the interpretation of the number of checks to be made varied between Member States;
305. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija zagotovila ustrezen obseg ključnih kontrol pri spremljanju pregledov; vendar soglaša s pomisleki Evropskega računskega sodišča glede tega, da se Komisija ni odzvala s pripravo zakonodajnih sprememb ali pravočasnih finančnih popravkov, kljub temu, da je bila s pomanjkljivostmi seznanjena že precej časa;
305.Welcomes the adequate coverage of key controls by the Commission when monitoring the checks; however shares the ECA's concerns that the Commission has not reacted, with legislative changes or timely financial corrections, despite the fact that it was aware of the weaknesses for some considerable time;
306. pozdravlja dejstvo, da na vzhodnih mejah Evropske unije pristojni organi preverjajo neoporečnost oznak, in spodbuja druge države članice k enakemu ravnanju;
306.Notes and welcomes the fact that the integrity of seals is verified by the competent authorities at the Eastern borders of the EU, and encourages the other Member States to follow this example;
307. poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje prizadevanja za spremembo ustrezne zakonodaje in obravnavo vprašanja o pregledih „tail-gate“ ter uvede obvezno uporabo analize tveganja za izvozne postopke v skladu z oceno Evropskega računskega sodišča;
307.Invites the Commission to continue its efforts to modify the relevant legislation with a view of addressing, among others, the issue of "tail-gate inspections", and to introduce the obligatory use of risk analysis for export procedures, in line with the ECA's assessment;
Del V: Posebno poročilo št. 5/2007 o upravljanju programa CARDS s strani Komisije
Part V: Special Report 5/2007 on the Commission’s management of the CARDS programme
308. meni, da je program CARDS veliko prispeval k politiki stabilizacije in približevanja;
308.Considers that the CARDS programme has made an important contribution to the stabilisation and rapprochement policy;
309. obžaluje visoko stopnjo pomanjkanja preglednosti pri upravljanju, ki ga izvaja Komisija in njene delegacije, kar onemogoča ocenjevanje; meni, da je nedopustno, da Komisija nima pregleda nad projekti, financiranimi iz programa CARDS, medtem ko je Evropska agencija za obnovo (EAR) javnosti dala na razpolago seznam sklenjenih pogodb z navedbo programov in projektov;
309.Regrets the considerable lack of transparency in management by the Commission and its delegations, which renders an evaluation impossible; considers it unacceptable that the Commission has no overview of the projects funded under CARDS, whereas the European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) has made available to the public the list of contracts it has signed, specifying programmes and projects;
310. opozarja na priporočila iz svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2007, ki spremlja sklep o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna agencije za obnovo za proračunsko leto 2005
310.Recalls the recommendations set out in its resolution of 24 April 2007 accompanying the decision on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the EAR for the financial year 2005
345. in zlasti na točko 23 te resolucije;
345. , and in particular point 23 thereof;
311. je presenečen nad ugotovitvijo, da je bila v državah, kjer je bilo upravljanje CARDS pod okriljem agencije za obnovo, sama agencija zadolžena za načrtovanje instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) v letih 2007 in 2008 ter za pripravo javnih razpisov, ki zahtevajo podpis Komisije; s tem v zvezi opozarja, da je to v nasprotju z mandatom agencije in da je zlasti postopek priprave javnih razpisov podoben praksi uradov za tehnično pomoč
311.Is very surprised to learn that, in the countries where CARDS was under the auspices of the EAR, the Agency alone is responsible for the programming of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) for 2007 and 2008 and for the preparation of tenders requiring the Commission’s signature; notes that this is contrary to the EAR’s mandate and that, in particular, the procedure for the preparation of tenders resembles the practice of "TAOs"
TAO. , ki jih je Parlament obsodil in so od takrat zaprti;
Technical Assistance Offices. , which were condemned by Parliament and have since been closed down;
312. s tem v zvezi meni, da Komisija v letu 2006 ni izpolnila obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz njenega sklepa iz leta 2005 o postopni ukinitvi agencije za obnovo, ki določa, da morajo delegacije Komisije v različnih balkanskih državah prevzeti polne pristojnosti od začetka izvajanja instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč;
312.Is of the opinion, in this context, that the Commission did not meet in 2006 the obligations arising from its own decision taken in 2005 on the phasing out of the EAR, which provided that the Commission delegations in the various Balkan countries should take full charge from the beginning of the IPA;
313. zahteva, naj Računsko sodišče izvede naknadno revizijo, ki bo osredotočena na primerjavo med upravljanjem programa CARDS s strani Komisije in upravljanjem tega programa, ki ga v imenu Komisije opravlja Evropska agencija za obnovo, ter njene rezultate predloži Parlamentu do septembra 2008;
313. .Requests the ECA to carry out a follow up audit focusing on a comparison between the Commission's management of the CARDS programme and the EAR's management of this programme on behalf of the Commission, the results of which should be presented to Parliament by September 2008;
Del VI: Posebno poročilo št. 7/2007 (predloženo na podlagi drugega pododstavka člena 248(4) Pogodbe ES) o sistemih nadzora, inšpekcijskih pregledov in kazni v zvezi s pravili za ohranjanje ribolovnih virov Skupnosti
Part VI: Special Report 7/2007 (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, of the EC Treaty) on the control, inspection and sanction systems relating to the rules on conservation of Community fisheries resources
314. pozdravlja objavo poročila in čestita Evropskemu računskemu sodišču za njegov dragocen doprinos pri obravnavanju tega zelo pomembnega vprašanja evropske politike;
314.Welcomes the publication of the report and congratulates the ECA for its most valuable contribution in addressing this very important issue of European policy;
316. pozdravlja izražen namen Komisije, da vključi pomanjkljivosti, opredeljene v poročilu, in da sprejme ukrepe v skladu s priporočili Računskega sodišča; obžaluje pa, da Komisija v svojih odgovorih ni jasno določila časovnega obdobja za prihodnje predloge;
316.Welcomes the Commission's declared intention to take on board those shortcomings identified in the report, as well as to take action in line with the recommendations of the ECA; regrets however the lack of a clear timeline in the Commission's replies as to its future proposals;
317. pozdravlja pobudo slovenskega predsedstva, da se za obravnavanje tega poročila18. februarja skliče izredno sejo Sveta za ribištvo o nadzoru ribištva;
317.Welcomes the Slovenian Presidency's initiative of calling an Extraordinary Fisheries Council on the Fisheries Control on February 18 to discuss this report;
318. ponovno potrjuje, da dobro upravljanje virov v skladu s previdnostnim načelom in načelom trajnostnega razvoja zahteva okrepitev obstoječih mehanizmov nadzora, da se državi zastave in obalni državi, kjer plovila izvajajo dejavnosti, omogoči dostop do informacij v realnem času o položaju plovila in ribolovnih dejavnostih, ki se izvajajo, kadar to želita;
318.Reaffirms that sound management of resources in line with the precautionary principle and the principle of sustainable development requires the strengthening of existing control mechanisms so that the flag State and the coastal State where vessels are operating can access information in real time on the vessel’s location and the fishing operations being carried out whenever they wish;
319. ob pregledu Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2847/93 z dne 12. oktobra 1993 o oblikovanju nadzornega sistema na področju skupne ribiške politike (nadzorna uredba)
319.Calls on the Commission, at the same time, when revising Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (the Control Regulation)
321. poudarja, da je sistem dogovorjenih kvot poleg kontrolnih mehanizmov temeljni problem; meni, da ni zadovoljivo, da se vsako leto določajo kvote, višje od tistih, ki jih priporočajo raziskovalci, da bi ohranili obnovljiv ribji stalež;
Stresses that, in addition to control mechanisms, the system of negotiated quotas is a fundamental problem; considers it unsatisfactory that, year after year, quotas are consistently set higher than researchers recommend in order to maintain viable fish stocks;
322. pozdravlja sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi C-304/-02, Komisija proti Franciji
322.Welcomes the judgment of the European Court of Justice in case C-304/-02 Commission v French Republic
UL C 247, 12.10.2002, str.
OJ C 247, 12.10.2002 p.
9. , ki je za Skupnost pomenila jasno potrditev vloge in obveznosti držav članic v zvezi z nadzorom in izvrševanjem pravil skupne ribiške politike;
9. , which has provided the Community with a clear confirmation of the role and obligations of Member States with regard to control and enforcement of CFP rules;
323. vendar ugotavlja, da je od ugotovitve kršitev in sprejetja te odločitve preteklo 21 let in da trajnost evropskega ribištva ne more prenesti takšnih časovnih zamikov pri odpravljanju nepravilnosti;
323.Notes, however, that 21 years have elapsed between the time when the infringements were detected and the time of this decision, and that the sustainability of European fisheries cannot cope with such time lags in correcting wrongdoings;
324. poudarja pomen ukrepov Komisije proti posameznim državam članicam, ko obstaja sum, da kršijo ali ne upoštevajo sistemov kontrol, pregledov ali kazni skupne ribiške politike;
324.Stresses the importance of action by the Commission against individual Member States where there is a suspicion that they are violating or ignoring the control, inspection or sanctions systems of the common fisheries policy.
326. pozdravlja sporočilo, ki ga je pred kratkim sprejela Komisija in s katerim je sprožila razpravo o izboljšanju kazalnikov ribolovne zmogljivosti in napora na podlagi skupne ribiške politike ( KOM(2007)0039 ), ter zato od Komisije pričakuje, da bo uporabila svojo pristojnost dajanja pobud in pripravila konkretne predloge za resnično izboljšanje skupne ribiške politike;
326.Welcomes the Communication recently adopted by the Commission launching a debate on improving fishing capacity and effort indicators for the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) ( COM(2007)0039 ), and therefore expects the Commission to use its power of initiative to come up with concrete proposals in order to really improve the CFP;
327. opaža in pozdravlja dejstvo, da je po objavi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št 1966/2006 z dne 21. decembra 2006 o elektronskem zapisovanju in poročanju podatkov o ribolovnih dejavnostih ter daljinskem zaznavanju
327.Notes and welcomes the fact that after publication of Council Regulation (EC) No 1966/2006 of 21 December 2006 on electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and on means of remote sensing
UL L 409, 30.
OJ L 409, 30.
UL L 340, 22.12.2007, str.
OJ L 340, 22.12.2007, p.
328. obžaluje, da čeprav Komisija predlaga razmeroma preproste ureditve napora, ki jih je mogoče nadzirati, je sistem postal precej bolj zapleten zaradi velikega števila odstopanj, ki so bila uvedena na zahtevo držav članic med razpravami v Svetu in ki so občutno zmanjšala zmožnost nadziranja celotnega sistema;
328.Regrets that, even if the Commission proposed rather simple and controllable effort regimes, the system was made considerably more complicated, due to a high number of derogations introduced on request by Member States during discussions in Council and which have reduced considerably the controllability of the whole system;
329. meni, da je veljavni zakonodajni okvir prezapleten in ni posodobljen, ter poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi svojo pristojnost dajanja pobud in pripravi konkretne predloge za izboljšanje razmer z namenom poenostavitve in uskladitve zakonodaje skupne ribiške politike;
329.Considers that the current legislative framework is too complex and not up to date and urges the Commission to use its power of initiative to come up with concrete proposals in order to improve the situation with the aim of simplification and harmonisation of CFP legislation;
330. obžaluje več pomanjkljivosti, ki zmanjšujejo učinkovitost fizičnih pregledov, in napake v sistemu prenosa podatkov kot celoti v državah članicah ter pomanjkanje evropske kulture nadzora v ribiškem sektorju;
330.Deplores the several weaknesses reducing the effectiveness of the physical checks, and the failures in the transmission data system as a whole in the Member States, as well as the lack of a European control culture in the fish sector;
331. pozdravlja prizadevanje Komisije za izboljšanje razmer v zvezi s podatki o ulovih in prodaji ter časovno razporeditvijo poročanja z uporabo novih tehnologij; meni, da bo uredba v zvezi z elektronskim zapisovanjem in poročanjem povečala učinkovitost sistemov potrjevanja, na primer s takojšnjim elektronskim prenosom kopije potrdila o prodaji organom države zastave in države iztovarjanja, ki se nato lahko navzkrižno preveri z deklaracijo o iztovarjanju;
331.Welcomes the Commission's efforts to improve the situation with regard to the data on catches and on sales, and the timing of reporting, by using the new technologies; considers that the regulation concerning the electronic recording and reporting will increase the efficiency of validation systems, for example by providing for immediate electronic transmission of a copy of the sales note to the flag State and landing State authorities so that it can be cross checked with the landing declaration;
332. poziva Komisijo, naj poveča medsebojno pomoč in upravno sodelovanje med organi držav članic ter izmenjavo informacij med pristojnimi nacionalnimi uradniki z vzpostavitvijo takšnega sistema, kot že obstaja za DDV;
332.Invites the Commission to increase mutual assistance and administrative cooperation between Member States' authorities and the exchange of information between competent national officials by creating a system like that already in place for the VAT community system;
333. meni, da je za nadzor in celotno skupno ribiško politiko zelo pomemben sistem, ki bi omogočal spremljanje ulova od začetka do končnega potrošnika, kot že obstaja na enotnem trgu EU za vsa druga živila, ter poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi takšen sistem;
333.Considers it of great importance for control and for the whole CFP to have a system which allows the follow-up of catches from origin to final consumer, as already exists in the internal market with respect to all other meals, and urges the Commission to put in place such a system;
334. poudarja, da je treba ribiške kvote upoštevati in podpirati; meni, da mora Komisija v primeru kakršnega koli suma kršitve ali goljufije glede sistema kvot sprejeti odločne in nepopustljive ukrepe;
334.Stresses that the fishing quotas set must be respected and upheld; considers that the Commission must take strong, resolute action in the event of any suspicion of breaches of, or fraud against, the quota system;
335. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj povečajo pristojnosti Agencije Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva in spodbujajo, da bo imela pomembno izvršilno vlogo pri nadzoru in usklajevanju skupne ribiške politike, izboljšanju preglednosti in usklajenosti ter da bo v okviru načrtov skupne uporabe usklajevala uvedbo skupnih postopkov;
335.Invites the Commission and the Member States to increase the competences of the Community Fisheries Control Agency and to promote the Agency's important executive role in the control and harmonisation of the CFP and in improving transparency and coordination by the establishment of common practices under the scope of the joint deployment plans;
336. poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga povečanje pristojnosti nadzornikov Komisije, ki morajo imeti večja pooblastila, da lahko za skupno ribiško politiko vzpostavijo skupno evropsko strategijo nadzora, države članice pa naj ta predlog sprejmejo;
336.Invites the Commission to propose and the Member States to accept the increasing of the competences of the Commission's controllers, who should have greater powers in order to create a common European control strategy in the CFP;
337. v zvezi s tem meni, da mora biti razmerje med stroški in koristmi, ki obstaja med sredstvi, namenjenimi nadzornim dejavnostim v skupni ribiški politiki, in rezultati teh nadzornih dejavnosti (sorazmernost in stroškovna učinkovitost nadzora), ključni element, ki ga mora Komisija upoštevati pri svojih prihodnjih predlogih glede skupne ribiške politike;
337.Considers, in this context, that the cost-benefit ratio existing between the resources dedicated to control activities in the CFP and the results obtained by these controls (the proportionality and cost-effectiveness of controls) should be a key element to be taken into consideration by the Commission in its future proposals concerning the CFP;
338. v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da so stroškovno najučinkovitejši mehanizmi nadzora tisti, pri katerih imajo zainteresirane strani neposreden interes za zagotavljanje trajnostnega ribolova;
338.Notes, in this regard, that the most cost-effective mechanisms of control are those where stake-holders have a direct interest in preserving the sustainability of fisheries;
339. v okviru zmanjšanja napora poziva države članice, naj se odločijo, ali se to zmanjšanje doseže:
339.Invites the Member States, in the framework of effort reduction, to decide whether such reduction will be accomplished through:
a) s skrajšanjem ribolovnega časa brez zmanjšanja zmogljivosti,
a) a reduction of fishing time, without a reduction of capacity,
b) z zmanjšanjem zmogljivosti brez skrajšanja ribolovnega časa ali
b) a reduction of capacity, without a reduction of fishing time, or
c) s kombinacijo obeh možnosti,
c) a combination of the two,
in da sprejmejo strukturne ukrepe, potrebne za ublažitev socialnega vpliva tega zmanjšanja;
and to put in place the necessary structural measures to mitigate the social impact of this reduction;
340. poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za spremembo zadevne zakonodaje, da bi se med drugim obravnavalo vprašanje presežnih zmogljivosti, in da predlaga ukrepe za zmanjšanje strukturno presežnih zmogljivosti v ribiški industriji;
340.Invites the Commission to continue its efforts to modify the relevant legislation to address, among other things, the issue of overcapacity, and to propose measures to reduce structural overcapacity in the fishing industry;
341. poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda druge politične rešitve, s katerimi bi se zmanjšalo potrebe po kontrolah in kaznih s povečanjem odgovornosti in interesa posameznih profesionalnih ribičev glede obnovljivega staleža;
341.Calls upon the Commission to review alternative political solutions under which the need for controls and sanctions would be reduced by increasing individual professional fishermen's responsibility for, and interest in, viable stocks;
Del VII: Posebno poročilo št. 9/2007 (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 248(4) ES) o "ocenjevanju okvirnih programov EU za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (RTR) – je mogoče pristop Komisije izboljšati?"
Part VII: Special Report 9/2007 (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, of the EC Treaty) on Evaluating the EU Research and Technological Development (RTD) framework programmes - could the Commission's approach be improved?
342. je seznanjen z dejstvom, da so bile v revizijo zajete ureditve o spremljanju in ocenjevanju, ki veljajo od leta 1995 za vsaj tri programska obdobja, in tudi pogled na okvirni program za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (RTR) (2007–2013);
342.Acknowledges that the audit covered the monitoring and evaluation arrangements in place for the last three programming periods since 1995 and also an outlook for the RTD framework programme 2007 to 2013;
343. poudarja, da je bilo okvirnim programom v obdobju 1995 – 2006 dodeljenih 42,63 milijard EUR, kar je povzročilo, da so postali najpomembnejši finančni instrument, ki prispeva k uresničevanju lizbonske strategije; v okviru trenutne finančne perspektive je sedmi okvirni program prejel 50,52 milijard EUR;
343.Emphasizes that the framework programmes running between 1995 and 2006 were endowed with EUR 42,63 billion, making them the most important financial instrument contributing to the Lisbon Strategy; under the current Financial perspective the 7th framework programme received EUR 50,52 billion;
344. ugotavlja, da je Evropsko računsko sodišče zastavilo vprašanje o tem, ali je imela Komisija ustrezen pristop k ocenjevanju rezultatov okvirnih programov, ter je pri tem usmerilo pozornost predvsem na logiko posega, strategijo ocenjevanja in metodologije;
344.Notes that the ECA addressed the question of whether the Commission's approach to assessing the results of the framework programmes was adequate, looking in particular at the intervention logic, the evaluation strategy and methodologies;
345. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija že v preteklih letih uvedla znatno število izboljšav;
345.Welcomes that over the years the Commission has already introduced a considerable number of improvements;
346. ugotavlja, da je Evropsko računsko sodišče opozorilo na skromno opredelitev programskih ciljev in pomanjkanje logike posega; vsekakor pa priznava, da o programskih ciljih odločajo zainteresirane strani in sozakonodajalci; zato poziva oblikovalce odločitev, naj posebno pozornost posvetijo opredelitvi dosegljivih ciljev; priznava, da sedmi okvirni program za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj
346.Observes that the ECA noticed poorly defined programme objectives and a lack of explicit intervention logic; acknowledges however that programme objectives are decided by stakeholders and the co-legislators; calls therefore on the decision-makers to pay particular attention to the definition of attainable objectives; recognises that a more explicit intervention logic is embedded in the 7th RTD Framework Programme
UL L 412, 30.12.2006 vsebuje jasnejšo logiko posega; poudarja, da morajo biti cilji operativni in izmerljivi (primerjanje uspešnosti), da se omogoči uporaba kazalnikov uspešnosti in uspešno spremljanje;
OJ L 412, 30.12.2006. ; underlines that objectives must be operational and measurable ("benchmarking") to allow for the use of performance indicators and effective monitoring;