natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tretji člen seveda ostane še naprej veljaven in uporaben v primeru, ko strani ne izkoristita možnosti izbire pravne pristojnosti.
Obviously, Article 3 will remain valid and applicable where parties do not exercise their freedom to choose the competent court.
Člen 3 a, odstavek 1 (Uredba (ES) št. 2201/2003)
Article 3a, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003)
Zakonca se lahko dogovorita, da je v postopkih med zakoncema v zvezi z razvezo ali prenehanjem življenjske skupnosti pristojno sodišče ali sodišča države članice, pod pogojem, da imata bistveno zvezo s to državo članico na podlagi dejstva,
The spouses may agree that a court or the courts of a Member State are to have jurisdiction in a proceeding between them relating to divorce or legal separation provided they have a substantial connection with that Member State by virtue of the fact that
Zakonca se lahko dogovorita, da je v postopkih med zakoncema v zvezi z razvezo ali prenehanjem življenjske skupnosti pristojno sodišče ali sodišča države članice, pod pogojem, da je njuna zakonska zveza bistveno povezana z izbrano državo članico na podlagi dejstva,
The spouses may agree that the courts of a Member State are to have jurisdiction in a proceeding between them relating to divorce or legal separation provided there is a substantial connection between their mar ria ge and the chosen Member State by virtue of the fact that
(a) da se uporablja kateri koli temelj pristojnosti iz člena 3 , ali
(a) any of the grounds of jurisdiction listed in Article 3 applies, or
(a) da sta imela zakonca v tej državi običajno prebivališče neprekinjeno vsaj tri leta, pod pogojem, da se to obdobje ni končalo več kot tri leta pred zahtevo za razvezo ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti , ali
(a) the spouses had their habitual residence in that State for a continuous period of at least three years, provided that period did not end more than three years before the application for a divorce or legal separation; or
(b) da sta imela zakonca v tej državi zadnje skupno običajno prebivališče najmanj 3 leta , ali
(b) it is the place of the spouses’ last common habitual residence for a minimum period of three years, or
(b) da je v tej državi zadnje običajno prebivališče zakoncev in da tam v trenutku zahteve še prebiva toženec , ali
(b) the spouses’ last habitual residence was situated in that State, and the respondent is still residing there at the time the application is made; or
(c) da je eden od zakoncev državljan te države članice ali, v primeru Združenega kraljestva in Irske, da ima svoje stalno prebivališče na ozemlju ene od slednjih držav članic.
(c) one of the spouses is a national of that Member State or, in the case of the United Kingdom and Ireland, has his or her “domicile” in the territory of one of the latter Member States .
(c) da ima v tej državi zakonec tožnik vsaj šest mesecev dejansko in stalno prebivališče, če je državljan iste države, ali vsaj eno leto, če ni državljan te države, ali, v primeru Združenega kraljestva in Irske, da ima tam stalno prebivališče , ali
(c) the applicant’s current habitual place of residence is in that State and he or she has resided there for a minimum period of six months if he or she is a national of that Member State or one year if he or she is not a national of that State , or, in the case of the United Kingdom and Ireland, the applicant has his or her “domicile” there; or
(ca) da je bila v tej državi članici sklenjena njuna zakonska zveza.
(ca) their mar ria ge took place in that Member State .
Preoblikovanje člena 3a omogoča boljšo razvrstitev meril povezave: prebivališče za daljše obdobje; prebivališče, tudi za krajše obdobje, pod pogojem, da je zadnje in da je združeno z dejanskim prebivališčem toženca; dejansko prebivališče tožnika, ki nekaj časa traja; kraj sklenitve zakonske zveze.
Rewording Article 3a makes it possible to list the following criteria for connecting factors on a more rational basis: prolonged residence; residence, albeit brief, provided it is the last place of residence of the couple and the current place of residence of the respondent; the current residence of the applicant for some time past; the place where the marriage was celebrated.
Tako se je mogoče izogniti protislovjem med zadevnimi meril, pa tudi med temi in tretjim členom te uredbe, ki se bo še naprej uporabljal, ko ne bo dogovora med strankama.
This avoids any conflict between the criteria in question, or between those criteria and Article 3 of the regulation, which will continue to apply in the absence of any agreement between the parties.
Ta dogovor se sklene v pisni obliki, oba zakonca ga datirata in podpišeta.
The agreement shall be expressed in writing , dated and signed by both spouses.
Treba je pojasniti formalne pogoje dogovora, navesti njihove učinke in ob pomanjkanju dogovora ohraniti splošna pravila o pristojnosti.
It is appropriate to clarify the formal requirements governing the agreement, stipulate its effects and maintain the general rules governing jurisdiction in the absence of agreement.
Če se pristojno sodišče po tej uredbi nahaja v državi članici, katere pravo ne predvideva razveze ali ne priznava obstoja ali veljavnosti določene zakonske zveze, je sodno pristojna:
When the competent jurisdiction under this Regulation is situated in a Member State whose law makes no provision for divorce or does not recognise the existence or validity of the mar ria ge in question, jurisdiction shall be allocated:
a) država članica državljanstva enega od zakoncev ali
(a) to the Member State of the nationality of one of the spouses; or
b) država članica, v kateri je bila sklenjena zakonska zveza.“
(b) to the Member State in which the mar ria ge was celebrated.”
Državi članici ni treba priznati zakonske zveze, ki je s svojo zakonodajo ne priznava, pa čeprav le zaradi namena razveze.
A Member State cannot be required to recognise as mar ria ge, even for the sole purpose of its dissolution, an act that is not considered to be such by the law of that state.
Prav tako bi bilo v nasprotju z načelom subsidiarnosti, če bi moral sodnik države članice, katere zakonodaja ne predvideva takšne zveze, razglasiti razvezo.
In the same way, it would be contrary to the principle of subsidiarity to impose on a judge in a Member State whose law does not provide for such an act the requirement to pronounce the divorce.
Zakonca se lahko dogovorita o pravu, ki se uporablja pri razvezi in prenehanju življenjske skupnosti.
The spouses may agree to designate the law applicable to divorce and legal separation .
Zakonca se lahko dogovorita za enega od naslednjih pravnih redov :
The spouses may agree to designate one of the following laws:
(a) pravo države zadnjega skupnega običajnega prebivališča, če eden od zakoncev še prebiva tam;
(a) the law of the State of the last common habitual residence of the spouses in so far as one of them still resides there;
(b) pravo države državljanstva enega od zakoncev, ali v primeru Združenega kraljestva in Irske, države stalnega prebivališča enega od zakoncev;
(b) the law of the State of the nationality of either spouse, or, in the case of United Kingdom and Ireland , the “domicile” of either spouse;
(c) pravo države, kjer sta zakonca prebivala najmanj 5 let;
(c) the law of the State where the spouses have resided for at least five years;
(d) pravo države članice, v kateri je vložen zahtevek.
(d) the law of the Member State in which the application is lodged.
Navedene okoliščine so širše od tistih v predlogu Komisije, kjer je izvzet zakon o prebivališču samega tožnika ali samega toženca (čeprav se ta načeloma lahko spet uporabi prek izbire sodnika v skladu s členom 20a(d).
The criterion proposed here is broader than that put forward in the Commission proposal, which rules out the law of the place of residence of the applicant or respondent alone (even though that law could, in principle, become applicable by virtue of the choice of court, pursuant to Article 20a(b)) .
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7
ARTICLE 1 – POINT 7
Člen 20 a, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 2201/2003)
Article 20 a – paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003)
Za izbiro zakoncev veljajo določbe iz odstavka 2 člena 3a.
The parties’ choice shall be subject to the formal requirements set out in paragraph 2 of Article 3a.
Predlog spremembe želi vzpostaviti vzporednice med obliko dogovora o pravu, ki se uporablja, in izbiro prava, ki se uporablja.
The amendment seeks to ensure that the formal requirements applying to the agreement designating the applicable law correspond to those applying to the choice of law.
Če ni možnosti izbire v skladu s členom 20a, se za razvezo ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti v naslednjem vrstnem redu uporabi pravo države članice :
In the absence of choice pursuant to Article 20a, divorce or legal separation shall be subject , in descending order, to the law of the Member State:
Pridruženi odbori - datum razglasitve na zasedanju
Associated committee(s) – date announced in plenary
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje
Committees asked for opinion s
Pridruženi odbori
Associated committee
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitute s present for the final vote
o obravnavanju izziva pomanjkanja vode in suše v Evropski uniji
on addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts in the European Union
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................15
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................15
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................19
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...19
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 18. julija 2007 z naslovom „Obravnavanje izziva pomanjkanja vode in suše v Evropski uniji“ (KOM(2007) 414),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 18 July 2007 entitled "Addressing the Challenges of Water Scarcity and Droughts in the European Union" ( COM(2007)0414 ) ("the Communication"),
– ob upoštevanju poročila o presoji vpliva in študij, ki sta jih pripravila Inštitut za evropsko okoljsko politiko in Evropska agencija za okolje,
– having regard to the Impact Assessment Report and studies prepared by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) and the European Environment Agency (EEA),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2003 o sporočilu Komisije o gospodarjenju z vodami v državah v razvoju in prednostnih nalogah razvojnega sodelovanja EU
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2003 on the Commission communication on water management in developing countries and priorities for EU development cooperation
UL C 76 E, 25.3.2004, str.
OJ C 76 E, 25.03.2004, p.
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. maja 2006 o naravnih nesrečah (požari, suše in poplave) – kmetijski vidiki
- having regard to its resolution of 18 May 2006 on natural disasters (forest fires, droughts and floods) – agricultural aspects
UL C 297E, 7.12.2006, str.
OJ C 297E, 7.12.2006, p.363. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za regionalni razvoj in Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0362/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Agriculture ( A6‑0362/2008 ),
A. ker problematika pomanjkanja vode in suše ni geografsko omejena na Evropsko unijo, ampak ima mednarodne posledice in je globalna težava; ker že prihaja do mednarodnih sporov zaradi vode in obstaja nevarnost, da bodo vedno pogostejši,
A. whereas the issue of water scarcity and droughts is not limited geographically to the European Union but has international repercussions and is a global problem; whereas international conflicts over water already exist and there is a rising danger of their increasing in frequency,
B. ker je voda bistvena za življenje in je skupna dobrina, ki se je ne sme obravnavati le kot blago; ker mora biti zagotavljanje enakopravnega dostopa do vode za vse, vključno s prihodnjimi generacijami, vodilo vsake vodne politike,
B. whereas water is essential to life and a common good which should not be reduced to a mere commodity; whereas ensuring fair access to water for all, including future generations, should guide all water policy,
C. ker so pomanjkanje vode in suše velik izziv s pomembnimi družbenimi, gospodarskimi in okoljskimi posledicami v Evropski uniji ter je bila celotna gospodarska škoda zaradi suše v EU v zadnjih 30 letih ocenjena na 100 milijard EUR,
C. whereas water scarcity and drought represent a major challenge with relevant socio-economic and environmental impacts in the EU; whereas the total economic impact of drought at EU level over the last 30 years is estimated at EUR 100 billion,
D. ker pomanjkanje vode in suša že vplivata na različne predele Evropske unije, pri čemer približno petina prebivalstva EU živi v državah z omejenimi vodnimi viri,
D. whereas water scarcity and drought already affect various parts of the EU with around one fifth of the EU's population living in countries experiencing stress on their water resources,
E. ker dezertifikacija, ki različno prizadene države Skupnosti, škodi naravnemu okolju ter povzroča degradacijo tal in s tem izgubo njihove kmetijske vrednosti,
E. whereas the desertification which is affecting Community countries to differing degrees is impoverishing the natural environment and leading to degradation of soils and consequent loss of their agricultural value,
F. ker pomanjkanje vode in suša nista enako resni težavi v vseh regijah EU, sta pa najresnejši v južnejših državah članicah;
F. whereas water scarcity and drought are not equally acute in all regions of the EU, being most acute in the more southerly Member States,
G. ker se med regijami načini, kako se kažejo težave zaradi pomanjkanja vode in suše, znatno razlikujejo; ker bi bil regionalni pristop najboljša podlaga ukrepov za obvladovanje teh težav,
G. whereas there are significant regional differences in the way in which problems resulting from water scarcity and drought manifest themselves; whereas measures to deal with these problems would be best based on a regional approach,
H. ker sta bila pomanjkanje vode in suša v zadnjih 30 letih vedno pogostejša in resnejša ter se bodo zaradi podnebnih sprememb razmere še poslabšale, zaradi česar se bo povečalo število izrednih hidroloških dogodkov v Evropski uniji in zunaj nje, kar bo verjetno vplivalo na kakovost in količino vodnih virov,
H. whereas water scarcity and drought have occurred with increasing frequency and severity over the past 30 years and climate change is likely to aggravate the situation, contributing to an increase in extreme hydrological events inside and outside the EU, probably affecting both the quality and quantity of water resources,
I. ker se voda ne uporablja trajnostno in ker se 20 % vode Evropske unije še vedno zapravi zaradi neučinkovitosti,
I. whereas trends in water use are unsustainable with the EU continuing to waste 20% of its water due to inefficiency,
J. ker huda suša skupaj z nižjo količino padavin povečuje nevarnost gozdnih požarov, kar dokazujejo uničujoči požari, ki so pred kratkim pustošili po južni Evropi,
J. whereas intense drought, accompanied by lower rainfall, is increasing the danger of forest fires, as evidenced by the devastating fires which recently swept through southern Europe,
K. ker ni celovite tehnično in znanstveno utemeljene ocene o količini vode v Evropski uniji; ker so razpoložljivi podatki na regionalni ravni in o sezonskih nihanjih zelo omejeni,
K. whereas no comprehensive, technically and scientifically sound assessment of the water quantity situation in the EU exists; whereas the available data at regional level and on seasonal variations are very limited,
L. ker lahko pomanjkanje vode povzročajo naravni vzroki, človeške dejavnosti ali kombinacija obojih zaradi pretiranega izkoriščanja naravnih zalog ali zmanjševanja kakovosti vode; ker je napačna uporaba vode eden od glavnih vzrokov za dezertifikacijo;
L. whereas water scarcity may be the result of natural causes, human activities or an interaction of both, either through over-use of the natural supply or through degradation of water quality; whereas the misuse of water is one of the causes of desertification;
M. ker se zaradi turizma dodatno povečuje povpraševanje po vodi, zlasti poleti in na obalnih območjih južne Evrope,
M. whereas tourism further increases demand for water, particularly during the summer period and in the coastal areas of southern Europe,
N. ker je za spremembo ravnanja in prakse ter za nastanek kulture varčevanja z vodo in učinkovite rabe vode bistveno spodbujanje ozaveščenosti in dajanje točnih informacij državljanom na različne načine, na primer prek informativnih in izobraževalnih kampanj,
N. whereas awareness raising and providing good information to citizens in different forms, e.g. via information and education campaigns, is of key importance to facilitate a change in behaviour and practices and the emergence of a water saving and efficient water use culture,
O. ker je javna oskrba z vodo temeljna javna storitev, povezana z javnim zdravjem, ki se je ne sme prekinjati,
O. whereas public supply of water is a fundamental public service linked to public health which should not be disrupted,
P. ker sta pomanjkanje vode in suša zapleteno okoljsko vprašanje, ki ga je treba urejati v tesni povezavi z drugimi okoljskimi vprašanji in ob upoštevanju teh vprašanj;
P. whereas water scarcity and drought are a complex environmental issue, and should as such be regulated in close connection with and taking account of other environmental issues;
Q. ker kmetijstvo kot proizvodni sektor resno prizadevata pomanjkanje vode in suša, hkrati pa ima pomembno vlogo pri trajnostnem upravljanju razpoložljivih vodnih virov;
Q. whereas agriculture, as a productive sector, suffers acutely from the effects of water scarcity and drought, while at the same time playing an important role in the sustainable management of available water resources,
R. ker ima večnamensko kmetijstvo v EU pomembno vlogo pri ohranjanju krajine, biotske raznovrstnosti in čiste vode, potrebuje finančno podporo za nekatere ukrepe ter znanstveno svetovanje o upravljanju vodnih virov;
R. whereas multifunctional agriculture in the EU plays an important role in the preservation of landscapes, biodiversity and clean water and therefore needs financial support for certain measures as well as scientific advice on water management,
S. ker sta pomanjkanje vode in suša pomembna dejavnika, ki vplivata na višanje cen kmetijskih surovin, ter je treba zagotoviti stalno oskrbo prebivalstva z živili,
S. whereas water scarcity and droughts are a significant factor in pushing up the prices of agricultural raw materials; whereas it is necessary to guarantee a stable food supply,
T. ker se v kmetijstvu porabijo velike količine vode in je ta dejavnost odvisna od oskrbe z vodo, mora biti vključeno kot odgovoren dejavnik v celostne regionalne sisteme za upravljanje vodnih virov za uravnoteženo porabo vode, preprečevanje izgube, prilagoditev pokrajine vodnim razmeram, načrtovanje kultur ter zaščito pred onesnaženjem vode;
T. whereas large amounts of water are required in agriculture and, as it therefore depends on water supply, agriculture must be included as a responsible actor in integrated regional water management systems as regards balanced use of water, stopping water wastage, adapted landscape and crop-planning as well as protection of water from pollution,
U. ker prihaja zaradi suše tudi do širjenja nekaterih fitosanitarnih katastrof, ki povzročajo močno zmanjšanje pridelkov,
U. whereas drought is also a contributory factor in the proliferation of certain phytosanitary pests, resulting in substantially lower harvests,
1. pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije in podpira predlagani prvi sklop možnosti za ukrepanje, vendar obžaluje, da je omejen na raven Evropske unije in držav članic; opozarja, da sta pomanjkanje vode in suša problem mednarodne razsežnosti ter da je treba ukrepati temu primerno;
Welcomes the Communication and supports the proposed first set of policy options for action, but regrets that its scope is limited to the EU and Member State level only; recalls that water scarcity and drought is a problem with an international dimension and that action needs to be taken accordingly;
4. poudarja, da so regije pomembno gonilo tehnološke inovacije na področju vode, ob upoštevanju, da bo učinkovitost rabe vode vse pomembnejši dejavnik za konkurenčnost; zato poziva regionalne organe, naj premislijo o narodnem in mednarodnem medregionalnem sodelovanju, izmenjavi informacij ter strateškemu partnerstvu za organizacijo učinkovitega regionalnega upravljanja voda;
Highlights the importance of the regions as a driving force behind technological innovation in the field of water, given that water efficiency will be an increasingly important factor for competitiveness; therefore urges regional authorities to consider national and international inter-regional cooperation, information exchange and strategic partnerships, with a view to organising efficient regional water management;
6. v tem smislu vztraja, naj se sredstva, dodeljena za infrastrukturo, namenijo za izvajanje ukrepov za izboljšanje upravljanja voda in oskrbo s kakovostno vodo ob upoštevanju obstoječih potreb;
Maintains in this context that infrastructure funding should be allocated with a view to implementing measures to improve the management and supply of high-quality water, in keeping with existing needs;
10. poudarja pomembnost vprašanja upravljanja vodnih virov v gorskih območjih ter poziva Komisijo, naj lokalne in regionalne organe spodbuja h krepitvi solidarnosti med nižje in višje ležečimi uporabniki;
Stresses the importance of the issue of water management in mountain areas and calls on the Commission to encourage local and regional authorities to develop a sense of solidarity between downstream and upstream users;
15. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva medsektorsko povezavo med družbenim in gospodarskim vplivom podnebnih sprememb na rabo tal ter stroški energije, povezanimi s temi spremembami; spodbuja EU, da za vse ocene učinkovitosti rabe vode uporabi objektivne in ekonomske kazalce;
Asks the Commission to take into account the inter-sectoral link between the social and economic impact of climate change on land usage and the energy costs associated with climate change; encourages the EU to conduct all water efficiency evaluations using objective and economic indicators;
19. poudarja, da je treba v smislu okvirne direktive o vodah pojasniti opredelitev „dolgotrajne suše“ in njenega vpliva na doseganje okoljskih ciljev iz okvirne direktive o vodah med sušnimi obdobji in po njih; poudarja, da sta pomanjkanje vode in suša povezana, a različna pojava, zato je treba zanju sprejeti različne strategije;
Stresses the need to clarify the definition of 'prolonged drought' (in the context of the WFD) and its implications for achieving the environmental objectives of the WFD in periods of drought and after such periods; points out that water scarcity and drought are related but different, and differentiated strategies should be adopted for them;
23. poudarja, da je dezertifikacija tesno povezana z gozdarstvom; odločno poziva k pogostejšemu pogozdovanju za zadrževanje in zmanjšanje pretiranega toka površinskih ali podzemnih voda ter boj proti degradaciji in eroziji tal;
Points out that desertification is closely connected to the forest economy; urges that greater use be made of afforestation to restrain and alleviate extreme surface and groundwater flow and to combat soil degradation and erosion;
26. ugotavlja, da sporočilo ne obravnava težav, do katerih prihaja v številnih regijah zaradi neprečiščene odpadne vode;
Notes that the Communication fails to address the problems arising in numerous regions from the non-purification of waste water;