natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– opustiti ustavni pristop in nekatere od njegovih značilnosti, kot so ideja, da Unija temelji na volji državljanov in njenih držav članic, enotno in strukturirano besedilo, jasnejša terminologija za določitev zakonodajnih instrumentov, določitev zastave in himne v pogodbi ter uporaba termina „zunanji minister“ namesto „visoki predstavnik“;
– abandon the constitutional approach and certain of its features, such as the notion of a Union based on the will of its citizens and Member States, a single and structured text, the clearer terminology to designate legislative instruments, the anchoring in the Treaty of the flag and the anthem and the use of the title “Foreign Minister” instead of “High Representative”;
– preložiti izvajanje pomembnih elementov nove pogodbe, kot je začetek veljavnosti novega volilnega sistema v Svetu (ki ga spremljajo posebne določbe za preložitev glasovanja, znane kot „kompromis iz Ioannine“), in običajnemu zakonodajnemu postopku na nekaterih področjih pristojnosti dodati omejevalne mehanizme, kot so „zasilne zavore“;
– postpone the implementation of important elements of the new Treaty, such as the entry into force of the new voting system in the Council (accompanied by special provisions for postponing votes known as the “Ioannina compromise”), and add restrictive mechanisms like “emergency brakes” to the ordinary legislative procedure in some areas of competence;
– v pogodbo vključiti ukrepe, ki so specifični za posamezno državo članico, kot je razširitev možnosti sodelovanja („opt-in“) na področje policijskega sodelovanja in sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah za dve državi članici, protokol, ki omejuje vpliv listine na britansko in poljsko notranje pravo, ter dodaten sedež v parlamentu, ki je bil dodeljen Italiji ob odstopanju od načela padajoče sorazmernosti;
– incorporate into the Treaty measures specific to particular individual Member States, such as the extension of the opt-in arrangements in relation to cooperation in police and criminal matters for two Member States, the protocol limiting the effect of the Charter on the domestic law of two Member States and the extra parliamentary seat attributed to a Member State in derogation of the principle of degressive proportionality;
– spremeniti besedilo več delov pogodbe ali protokolov in deklaracij iz prilog, ki imajo neupravičeno negativen prizvok, ki daje občutek nezaupanja v Unijo in njene institucije ter s tem javnosti pošilja napačno sporočilo;
– modify the wording of several passages of the Treaty, or of the protocols and declarations annexed to it, entailing an unjustified shift to a negative tone, which gives an impression of mistrust vis-à-vis the Union and its institutions and thus sends a wrong signal to the public;
7. potrjuje pogodbo in poudarja pomembnost dejstva, da jo vse države članice Unije ratificirajo pravočasno, da bo lahko začela veljati 1. januarja 2009;
Endorses the Treaty and stresses the need for all Member States of the Union to achieve its ratification in good time for its entry into force on 1 January 2009;
10. ponavlja svojo zahtevo, da si morajo institucije EU in državni organi v skladu z načelom lojalnega sodelovanja prizadevati po najboljših močeh, da se evropske državljane jasno in nepristransko seznani z vsebino pogodbe;
Reiterates its request that all possible efforts be deployed, both by EU institutions and national authorities in accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation, in order to inform European citizens clearly and objectively about the content of the Treaty;
Človeških poslov tok kipi in pada:
There is a tide in the affairs of men,
izrabi plimo, k sreči te privede,
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
zamudi jo, in vso življenja pot
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
se moraš v stiski med klečevjem viti.
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
Mi plujemo zdaj po nabreklem morju;
On such a full sea are we now afloat;
držimo struje se, dokler nam služi,
And we must take the current when it serves,
če ne, zgubljena ladja in tovor.
Or lose our ventures.
Julij Cezar.
Julius Caesar.
Postopek evropskega povezovanja je vse prej kot preprost.
The European integration process is anything but plain sailing.
Leta 2004 smo soporočevalci imeli to čast, da smo sestaviti poročilo Parlamenta o Pogodbi o ustavi za Evropo; sedaj, tri leta kasneje, smo dobili enako nalogo za lizbonsko pogodbo, ki je nadomestila pogodbo o ustavi.
In 2004 we co-rapporteurs had the privilege of drafting Parliament's report on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and now, three years later, we have been given the same responsibility for the Lisbon Treaty that has taken its place.
Smo zato v edinstvenem položaju, da odgovorimo na večno vprašanje, ali lahko človek dvakrat stopi v isto reko.
We thus find ourselves in the singular position of having to answer the age-old question of whether one can step into the same river twice.
Odgovor mora biti pritrdilen, saj bomo lahko edino tako Parlamentu nakazali smernice o tem, kako naj, s Shakespearjevimi besedami, "držimo struje se, dokler nam služi", da ne bosta "zgubljena ladje in tovor".
And the answer must be 'yes', as this is the only way that we will be able to provide Parliament with guidance in how, in the words of William Shakespeare, to 'take the current when it serves', so as not to 'lose our ventures'.
Naloga, ki je bila zaupana soporočevalcem, je nujno poučna: enako kot leta 2004 predlagamo, da se primerja pogodbi, ki sta trenutno v veljavi, s pogodbo, ki je bila podpisana v Lizboni 13. decembra 2007 in ki je trenutno v postopku ratifikacije v 27 državah članicah.
The task entrusted to the co-rapporteurs is necessarily didactic in nature: as we did in 2004, we now propose to compare the Treaties currently in force with the Treaty signed in Lisbon on 13 December 2007, which is currently undergoing ratification in the 27 Member States.
Da bi vedeli, kam gremo, bi bilo dobro razmisliti o tem, od kod prihajamo: pred več kot pol stoletja je Schumanova deklaracija spodbudila ambiciozen podvig: združitev Evropejcev, ki so jih več stoletij razdruževali bratomorni spori, v skupen projekt.
In order to know where we are going, it is a good idea to consider where we are coming from: more than half a century ago, the Schuman Declaration set in train an ambitious undertaking: that of uniting Europeans, who had been divided for centuries by fratricidal conflicts, around a common project.
Od ustanovitve prve Evropske skupnosti (za premog in jeklo: Pariška pogodba z dne 18.
Since the first European Community (Coal and Steel: Paris Treaty of 18 April 1951
Belgija, Nemčija, Francija, Italija, Luksemburg in Nizozemska. , se je povezovanje Skupnosti razširilo na sedemindvajset evropskih držav
Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. , was established, the European integration process has been extended to embrace 27 European States
Evropski parlament si vse od izvolitve na splošnih volitvah leta 1979 prizadeva demokratizirati delovanje povezave, ki je kasneje postala Evropska unija, in njeno delovanje narediti učinkovitejše in preglednejše.
Ever since the first European elections by universal suffrage in 1979, Parliament has consistently sought to democratise and make more effective and transparent the workings of what was to become the European Union.
Evropski parlament je v vsaki od teh faz na pobudo ustavnega odbora, ki je nato leta 1999 postal Odbor za ustavne zadeve, dejavno sodeloval pri pripravah in ocenil rezultate različnih medvladnih konferenc
At each stage, with the Committee on Institutional Affairs, which in 1999 became the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, providing the driving force, Parliament played an active part in the preparatory talks and assessed the outcome of the various Intergovernmental Conferences (IGCs)
Navedene so na eni strani pripravljalne resolucije za medvladno konferenco, na drugi strani pa resolucije, ki ocenjujejo rezultat konference.
Resolutions on the preparations for the IGCs and assessing their outcomes:
- Enotni evropski akt :
- Single European Act
- Maastrichtska pogodba:
- Maastricht Treaty
resolucije o poročilu D.
. resolutions on the report by D. Martin of
- Pogodba iz Nice:
- Treaty of Nice
Parlament skuša doseči tri ločene, a med seboj povezane cilje:
Three distinct but related objectives have been pursued by Parliament to this end:
Prvič, prizadeva si za razjasnitev, in če je to potrebno, utrditev pristojnosti in odgovornosti Evropske unije.
First, it has sought to clarify and where necessary strengthen the competences and responsibilities of the European Union itself.
Dosledno zagovarja stališče, da se morajo pristojnosti Evropski uniji dodeliti in da jih mora ta izvajati na podlagi „načela subsidiarnosti“, kar pomeni, da mora izpolnjevati le tiste obveznosti, ki se lahko s skupnimi politikami izvajajo učinkoviteje, kot če države članice delujejo vsaka zase.
Parliament has consistently argued that powers should be attributed to, and exercised by, the Union on the basis of the ‘principle of subsidiarity’, i.e. it should exercise those responsibilities - but only those responsibilities - that can be carried out more effectively by common policies than by the Member States acting separately.
Drugič, Parlament zagovarja stališče, da se morajo odgovornosti, ki se izvajajo na evropski ravni, izvajati učinkoviteje.
Second, it has argued that responsibilities exercised at European level should be carried out more effectively.
Zlasti je kritičen do soglasnega odločanja v Svetu, pri čemer zagovarja stališče, da pri dogovorjenem skupnem izvajanju politike nima nobenega smisla dati vsaki od držav članic Evropske unije možnost, da prepreči skupne odločitve.
Parliament was particularly critical of the practice of unanimity in the Council, arguing that, where agreement has been reached to run a policy jointly, it makes no sense to give a blocking power to each of the component States of the Union.
Prav tako zagovarja stališče, da se Komisiji da večja vloga pri izvrševanju že sprejetih politik, seveda ob primernem spremljanju in nadzoru.
It has also pleaded for a stronger role to be given to the Commission in carrying out policies once they have been agreed, subject to proper scrutiny and control.
Pristojnosti, ki so jih nacionalni parlamenti z ratifikacijo pogodb prenesli na Unijo, ne bi smel izvajati samo Svet (tj. ministri držav članic).
Those responsibilities which national parliaments, in ratifying the Treaties, have transferred to the Union should not be exercised by the Council (i.e. national ministers) alone.
Manjše parlamentarne pristojnosti na nacionalni ravni bi se morale nadomestiti z večjimi parlamentarnimi pristojnostmi na evropski ravni.
The loss of parliamentary powers at the national level should be offset by an increase in parliamentary power at European level.
Ob mešanih in očitno nezadovoljivih rezultatih Amsterdamske pogodbe in Pogodbe iz Nice zaradi podvojitve števila držav članic, pa tudi zaradi nadaljnjega poglabljanja Unije, je bilo vedno bolj jasno, da metoda revizije pogodb, kakršna se je izvajala, ne more več zagotoviti pravih rešitev za razvoj Evrope.
In the light of the mixed and clearly inadequate results achieved by the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice, when set against the challenge posed by the doubling in the number of Member States, but also that of the further deepening of the Union, it became more and more apparent that the established method of revising the Treaties was no longer able to provide genuine responses to the issues raised by the development of Europe.
Ker so se podpisniki Pogodbe iz Nice zavedali njenih pomanjkljivosti, so ji priložili izjavo št. 23 „o prihodnosti Unije“
The signatories to the Treaty of Nice, being aware of its imperfections, in fact annexed to it a Declaration No 23 'on the future of the Union'
Konvencija o Listini o temeljnih pravicah je dejansko dokazala, da je takšen organ sposoben pripraviti osnutek, ki ga odobrijo voditelji držav in vlad.
The Convention on the Charter of Fundamental Rights demonstrated that a body of this kind was able to prepare a draft text likely to secure the approval of the Heads of State or Government.
Njena odprtost in preglednost ter kakovostne izmenjave mnenj so prav tako pripomogle k soglasju, katerega vir je bila najprej možnost vsakogar, da izrazi svoje mnenje in nato razume mnenja drugih.
The open and transparent nature of the Convention and the quality of its debates had also facilitated efforts to achieve a consensus by giving every representative the opportunity, first of all, to express his or her own views, and, subsequently, to understand those of the other representatives.
SN 300/1/01 REV 1, priloga 1, str.
SN 300/1/01 REV 1, Annex 1, p.
19. določil način in načrt dela konvencije ter zlasti teme, o katerih bo morala razpravljati.
19. , followed up this initiative by setting out the organisational arrangements for the work of the Convention and, above all, defining its terms of reference and the issues that it would be called upon to discuss.
Pod predsedstvom Valéryja Giscarda d'Estainga ter podpredsedstvom Giuliana Amata in Jean-Luca Dehaena je bila konvencija zadolžena za pripravo predhodnega osnutka ustave, ki bi se uporabil kot podlaga za delo medvladne konference, ki bi sledila konvenciji.
Thus, the Convention on the Future of Europe (chairman: Valéry Giscard d’Estaing; vice-chairmen: Giuliano Amato and Jean-Luc Dehaene) was given the task of drawing up a preliminary draft Constitution to serve as the basis for the work of the IGC which was to follow.
2000: poročilo Duff/Voggenhuber o pripravi Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije (UL C 377, 29.12.2000, str.
Resolution of 16 March 2000: Duff/Voggenhuber report on the drafting of a European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights (OJ C 377, 29.12.2000, p.
2000: poročilo Duff/Voggenhuber o odobritvi osnutka Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije (UL C 223, 8.8.2001, str.
Decision of 14 November 2000: Duff/Voggenhuber report on approval of the draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ C 223, 8.8.2001, p.
2002: poročilo Duff o učinku Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije in njenem prihodnjem statusu (UL C 300E, 11.12.2003, str.
Resolution of 23 October 2002: Duff report on the impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union and its future status (OJ C 300E, 11.12.2003, p.
2001: poročilo Leinen/Méndez de Vigo o zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Laeknu in prihodnosti Unije (UL C 153, 27.6.2002, str.
Resolution of 29 November 2001: Leinen/Méndez de Vigo report on the Laeken European Council and the future of the Union (OJ C 153, 27.6.2002, p.
2001: poročilo Poos o reformi Sveta (UL C 112, 9.5.2002, str.
Resolution of 25 October 2001: Poos report on the reform of the Council (OJ C 112, 9.5.2002, p.
2002: poročilo Carnero Gonzáles o statusu pravne osebe Evropske unije (UL C 47, 27.2.2003, str.
Resolution of 14 March 2002: Carnero González report on the legal personality of the European Union (OJ C 47, 27.2.2003, p.
2002: poročilo Napolitano o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti v okviru evropskega povezovanja (UL C 284, 21.11.2002, str.
Resolution of 7 February 2002: Napolitano report on relations between the European Parliament and the national parliaments in European integration (OJ C 284, 21.11.2002, p.
2002: poročilo Lamassoure o razmejitvi pristojnosti med Evropsko unijo in državami članicami (UL C 180, 31.7.2003, str.
Resolution of 16 May 2002: Lamassoure report on the division of competences between the European Union and the Member States (OJ C 180, 31.7.2003, p.
2002: poročilo Bourlanges o tipologiji aktov in hierarhiji zakonodaje v Evropski uniji (UL C 31, 5.2.2004, str.
Resolution of 17 December 2002: Bourlanges report on the typology of acts and the hierarchy of legislation in the European Union (OJ C 31, 5.2.2004, p.
2003: poročilo Napolitano o vlogi regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti v evropskem povezovanju (UL C 38E, 12.2.2004, str.
Resolution of 14 January 2003: Napolitano report on the role of regional and local authorities in European integration (OJ C 38E, 12.2.2004, p.
2003: o osnutku Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo in mnenju Evropskega parlamenta o sklicu medvladne konference (UL C 77E, 26.3.2004, str.
Resolution of 24 September 2003 on the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and the European Parliament’s opinion on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) (OJ C 77E, 26.3.2004, p.
255). , ki ga je medvladna konferenca spremenila le v maloštevilnih točkah.
255). , only a very few provisions of which would be modified by the IGC.
Žal postopek ratifikacije ni potekal po pričakovanjih: zaradi negativnega izida referendumov v Franciji in na Nizozemskem je bilo treba določiti nov pristop.
Unfortunately, the ratification procedure took an unexpected turn: the ‘no’ votes in the referendums in France and the Netherlands forced a rethink.
Tudi evropske institucije so bile pozvane, da prispevajo k razpravi.
The European institutions were also invited to make their contribution.
Vzporedno so se nadaljevale ratifikacije, tudi po referendumski poti.
In the meantime, further ratifications have been carried out, some by means of referendums.
Parlament je svoje obveznosti na tem področju v celoti izpolnil.
For its part, Parliament has fulfilled all its responsibilities in this area.
Od začetka je podpiral poglobljen javni dialog na evropski ravni o ključnih izzivih evropske integracije in zavrnil kakršen koli poskus selektivnega izvajanja ustavne pogodbe („izbiranje najboljšega“).
From the outset, it supported the idea of initiating an in-depth public debate at European level on the main issues at stake in the European integration process and rejected any attempt to push through the selective implementation of the Constitutional Treaty (cherry picking).
Parlament je zlasti prispeval k javni razpravi z idejo o „medparlamentarnih forumih“ za obravnavo ključnih vprašanj glede prihodnosti Evrope.
Parliament made its own particular contribution to the public debate by proposing that ‘interparliamentary forums’ should be held to discuss issues fundamental to the future of Europe.
Do zasedanja Evropskega sveta junija 2007, na katerem je bil sprejet sklep o ponovnem sklicu medvladne konference, so bili organizirani trije forumi
A total of three forums were held in the period leading up to the June 2007 European Council at which the decision was taken to reconvene the IGC
Še eden je potekal 3. in 4. decembra 2007, ko je že bil sprejet politični dogovor o lizbonski pogodbi .
A fourth took place on 3 and 4 December 2007, after the political agreement on the Treaty of Lisbon had already been reached. .
Ti forumi so prispevali k utrditvi prepričanja med izvoljenimi predstavniki državljanov celotne Unije, da težave, na katere naj bi odgovorila ustavna pogodba, z neuspehom njene ratifikacije niso izginile in da so institucionalne novosti, ki jih pogodba uvaja, tudi v drugačni obliki ključne, da bi Unija lahko obvladovala izzive, ki jih prinaša vse bolj globaliziran svet.
These forums helped to strengthen, among the elected representatives of the citizens of all the Member States, the conviction that the problems to which the Constitutional Treaty was intended as a response had not simply disappeared following the failure of the ratification process and that, although perhaps in a different form, the institutional changes it incorporated were overall still vitally needed in order to enable the Union to address the challenges awaiting it in an ever more globalised world.
Nemško predsedstvo je zaznamoval povratek institucionalnih reform v središče dnevnega reda Unije.
The German Presidency saw institutional issues return to the top of the Union agenda.
Seveda uporabljen postopek ni mogel zadovoljiti tistih, ki so doživeli vzdušje dialoga in preglednosti konvencije, ki je tudi pozitivno vplivala na medvladno konferenco leta 2004.
The procedure employed inevitably disappointed those who had experienced the atmosphere of dialogue and transparency which had marked the Convention, an atmosphere which had spilled over to the 2004 IGC, moreover.
Zato so pogajanja o ponovnem izvajanju reforme pogodb za zagotovitev resnih možnosti za uspeh najprej potekala dvostransko med predsedstvom in vsako od držav članic.
In an effort to guarantee real chances of success, the discussions on the relaunching of the reform of the Treaties were initially held bilaterally, between the Presidency and each of the Member States.
Kljub temu je treba spomniti, da je Evropski parlament od začetka sodeloval pri posvetovanju na ravni „šerp“
It should be noted that the EP was involved in the consultations from the outset through the work of the 'sherpas'
Ime, ki se uporablja za po dva predstavnika vlade vsake od držav članic, Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije, ki so sodelovali v fazi pred posvetovanji.
Name given to the two representatives from each Member State and from the EP and the Commission who took part in this preparatory phase of the talks.
Evropski parlament so predstavljali „šerpe“ Klaus Welle, vodja kabineta predsednika Hans-Gert Pöttering, in José Luís Pacheco, član sekretariata Odbora za ustavne zadeve. in je tako lahko prispeval k pripravi mandata, ki ga je nemško predsedstvo predložilo na zasedanju Evropskega sveta junija 2007.
Parliament's 'sherpas' were Klaus Welle, the Head of President Hans-Gert Pöttering's Cabinet, and José Luís Pacheco, a member of the secretariat of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs. and was thus able to make its contribution to the drafting of the mandate which the German Presidency submitted to the June 2007 European Council.
Ker je to predstavljanje potekalo na ravni predsedstva po neposrednem imenovanju s strani predsednika Parlamenta, se je uporabil ad hoc postopek obveščanja/posvetovanja med predsednikom, predsednikom Odbora za ustavne zadeve in koordinatorji političnih skupin v tem odboru.
Since those 'sherpas' were appointed directly by the President of Parliament from among the staff of the Secretariat, an ad hoc information/consultation procedure was established involving the President, the chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the political group coordinators from that committee.
Delo skupine pravnih strokovnjakov se je izkazalo kot odločilno, saj drugače medvladna konferenca ne bi dogovora dosegla v tako kratkem času.
The work of the group of legal experts proved decisive in helping the IGC reach an agreement so quickly.
Druga vprašanja, o katerih je še potekala razprava (britanski in irski opt-out/opt-in v zvezi z nekdanjim tretjim stebrom, ohranjena vloga EP pri imenovanju podpredsednika/visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko ipd.), so bila praktično vsa rešena v dneh tik pred Evropskih svetom, zlasti na sestanku medvladne konference na ministrski ravni med svetom za splošne zadeve 15. oktobra v Luksemburgu.
The other issues still under discussion – the British and Irish opt-outs/opt-ins on matters previously covered by the third pillar, the safeguarding of the EP's role in the appointment of the Vice-President/High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, etc. – had practically all been dealt with in the final days leading up to the European Council, in particular at the meeting of the IGC at ministerial level held during the General Affairs Council which took place on 15 October 2007 in Luxembourg.
Kljub vsemu so se voditelji držav in vlad v Lizboni lahko hitro sporazumeli: medvladna konferenca je bila zaključena okoli ene zjutraj, v petek, 19. oktobra 2007.
In Lisbon the Heads of State or Government were thus able to reach an agreement quickly: the IGC came to an end towards 01.00 on Friday, 19 October 2007.
V drugem delu te obrazložitve bi sedaj radi analizirali posledice in dobre (ali slabe) točke lizbonske pogodbe, ki je bila svečano podpisana 13. decembra 2007 v Lizboni.
In the second part of this explanatory statement, we propose to consider the implications and the merits (or drawbacks) of the Treaty of Lisbon, which was officially signed on 13 December 2007 in Lisbon.
Prednosti nove pogodbe glede na veljavne pogodbe
How does the new Treaty represent a step forward by comparison with the Treaties in force?