natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če Evropski parlament ali Svet nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu v roku iz odstavka 1, akt ne začne veljati.
If either the European Parliament or the Council objects to the delegated act within the period referred to in paragraph 1, it shall not enter into force.
Institucija, ki nasprotuje, navede razloge za nasprotovanje delegiranemu aktu.".
The institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.".
Instrument financiranja za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic po svetu (sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1889/2006)
Financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2006)
Gabriele Albertini, Pino Arlacchi, Sir Robert Atkins, Dominique Baudis, Franziska Katharina Brantner, Frieda Brepoels, Elmar Brok, Arnaud Danjean, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadzigeorgiu (Takis Hadjigeorgiou), Heidi Hautala, Anna Ibrisagic, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jelko Kacin, Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Sabine Lösing, Barry Madlener, Mario Mauro, Kiriakos Mavronikolas (Kyriakos Mavronikolas), Francisco José Millán Mon, Alexander Mirsky, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Raimon Obiols, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Vincent Peillon, Alojz Peterle, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Adrian Severin, Marek Siwiec, Ernst Strasser, Hannes Swoboda, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Kristian Vigenin, Graham Watson, Boris Zala
Gabriele Albertini, Pino Arlacchi, Sir Robert Atkins, Dominique Baudis, Franziska Katharina Brantner, Frieda Brepoels, Elmar Brok, Arnaud Danjean, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Heidi Hautala, Anna Ibrisagic, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jelko Kacin, Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Sabine Lösing, Barry Madlener, Mario Mauro, Kyriakos Mavronikolas, Francisco José Millán Mon, Alexander Mirsky, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Raimon Obiols, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Vincent Peillon, Alojz Peterle, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Adrian Severin, Marek Siwiec, Ernst Strasser, Hannes Swoboda, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Kristian Vigenin, Graham Watson, Boris Zala
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Elena Băsescu, Emine Bozkurt, Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), Véronique De Keyser, Kinga Gál, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Evgeni Kirilov, Georgios Kumucakos (Georgios Koumoutsakos), Barbara Lochbihler, Norbert Neuser, Doris Pack, Marietje Schaake, György Schöpflin, Alf Svensson, Ivo Vajgl, Renate Weber
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Elena Băsescu, Emine Bozkurt, Nikolaos Chountis, Véronique De Keyser, Kinga Gál, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Evgeni Kirilov, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Barbara Lochbihler, Norbert Neuser, Doris Pack, Marietje Schaake, György Schöpflin, Alf Svensson, Ivo Vajgl, Renate Weber
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Tamásu Deutschu
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Tamás Deutsch
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Tamásu Deutschu, ki so jo madžarski pravosodni organi posredovali 9. junija 2010 in ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 8. julija 2010,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Tamás Deutsch, forwarded by the Hungarian judicial authorities on 9 June 2010 and announced in plenary sitting on 8 July 2010,
– po zagovoru Deutscha v skladu s členom 7(3) poslovnika,
– having heard Tamás Deutsch in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju členov 8 in 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije z dne 8. aprila 1965 ter člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Articles 8 and 9 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropske unije z 12. maja 1964, 10. julija 1986 in 21. oktobra 2008
– having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 12 May 1964, 10 July 1986 and 21 October 2008
Zadeva101/63 Wagner proti Fohrmann in Krier [1964] ECR 195, Zadeva 149/85 Wybot proti Faure in drugimi [1986] ECR 2391, združeni zadevi C-200/07 in C-201/07 Marra proti De Gregorio in Clemente, ki še nista objavljeni v zbirki odločb Sodišča. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and Others [1986] ECR 2391 and Joined Cases C-200/07 and C-201/07 Marra v De Gregorio and Clemente , not yet reported in the European Court Reports. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 10(2) zakona LVII iz leta 2004 o pravnem položaju madžarskih poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, člena 5(1) zakona LV iz leta 1990 o pravnem položaju poslancev madžarskega parlamenta in člena 12(1) zakona LVII iz leta 2004,
– having regard to Section 10(2) of Act LVII of 2004 on the legal status of Hungarian Members of the European Parliament, Section 5(1) of Act LV of 1990 on the legal status of Members of the Hungarian Parliament and Section 12(1) of Act LVII of 2004,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0015/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0015/2011 ),
A. ker na sodišču drugega in tretjega okrožja v Budimpešti na zahtevo madžarskega državljana proti Tamásu Deutschu, poslancu Evropskega parlamenta, poteka kazenski postopek zaradi obtožbe o obrekovanju po členu 179(2)(b-c) madžarskega kazenskega zakonika,
A. whereas criminal proceedings have been brought by a Hungarian citizen against Tamás Deutsch, a Member of the European Parliament, who is accused in the Court of the 2 nd and 3 rd Districts of Budapest of defamation under Section 179(2)(b-c) of the Hungarian Criminal Code,
C. ker je v skladu s členom 10(2) zakona LVII iz leta 2004 o pravnem položaju madžarskih poslancev Evropskega parlamenta poslanec Evropskega parlamenta deležen enake imunitete kot poslanec madžarskega parlamenta,
C. whereas, according to Section 10(2) of Act LVII of 2004 on the legal status of Hungarian Members of the European Parliament, a Member of the European Parliament is accorded the same immunity as a Member of the Hungarian Parliament,
D. ker se lahko po členu 5(1) zakona LV iz leta 1990 o pravnem položaju poslancev madžarskega parlamenta kazenski postopek proti poslancu sproži le ob predhodni odobritvi madžarskega parlamenta in ker v skladu s členom 12(1) zakona LVII iz leta 2004 o odvzemu imunitete poslancu Evropskega parlamenta odloča Evropski parlament,
D. whereas according to Section 5(1) of Act LV of 1990 on the legal status of Members of the Hungarian Parliament, criminal proceedings may be launched or pursued against the Member only with the prior consent of the Hungarian Parliament and pursuant to Section 12(1) of Act LVII of 2004 the European Parliament shall decide on the suspension of the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament,
E. ker je Deutsch obtožen kaznivega dejanja obrekovanja, ki naj bi ga zagrešil z izjavami, ki jih je izrekel o pritožniku v radijski oddaji 25. marca 2010, na katero je bil povabljen v vlogi politika in poslanca Evropskega parlamenta,
E. whereas Mr Deutsch is charged with an offence of defamation allegedly committed as a result of statements made about the accuser in the course of a radio programme broadcast on 25 March 2010 to which he was invited in his capacity as a politician and a Member of the European Parliament,
F. ker je zato mogoče reči, da je Deutsch stališča izrazil pri opravljanju nalog poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
F. whereas it is therefore appropriate to state that Mr Deutsch expressed opinions in the performance of his duties as the Member of the European Parliament,
Predsednik je na zasedanju 8. julija 2010 v skladu s členom 6(2) poslovnika razglasil, da je prejel pismo madžarskih pravosodnih oblasti z dne 9. junija 2010 z zahtevo za odvzem imunitete Tamásu Deutschu.
At the sitting of 8 July 2010 the President announced, under Rule 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, that he had received a letter sent by the Hungarian judicial authorities on 9 June 2010 requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Tamás Deutsch.
Sodišče drugega in tretjega okrožja v Budimpešti je Evropski parlament zaprosilo, naj odvzame imuniteto svojemu poslancu Deutschu, zoper katerega poteka kazenski postopek.
The Court of the 2nd and 3rd Districts of Budapest asked the European Parliament to waive the immunity of its Member, Tamás Deutsch, against whom criminal proceedings are being brought in that court.
Deutsch je v postopku, ki poteka na sodišču v Budimpešti, obtožen kaznivega dejanja obrekovanja po členu 179(2)(b-c) madžarskega kazenskega zakonika.
Tamás Deutsch is accused in the proceedings pending in the Budapest Court of the criminal offence of defamation under Section 179(2)(b-c) of the Hungarian Criminal Code.
Iz obtožnice izhaja, da je Deutsch v radijski oddaji „Razpravljajmo” (Megbeszéljük), ki je bila 25. marca 2010 predvajana na radijski postaji Klubradio, izrekel več domnevno lažnih trditev o pritožnikovi preteklosti, ki jih slednji vidi kot obrekovanje.
The case against Tamás Deutsch is that during a radio programme "Let's discuss it" (Megbeszéljük) broadcast on the "Klubradio" radio station on 25 March 2010 Tamás Deutsch expressed a number of allegedly untrue statements concerning the past of the accuser and considered by him to be defamatory.
Zaradi tega je proti Deutschu sprožil kazenski postopek.
Accordingly, the accuser brought the criminal proceedings against Tamás Deutsch.
Člena 8 in 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 določa naslednje:
Articles 8 and 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, read as follows:
Glede na navedeno je treba zahtevo sodišča drugega in tretjega okrožja v Budimpešti obravnavati kot zahtevo za odločitev Evropskega parlamenta o odvzemu imunitete Tamásu Deutschu, da bo slednji lahko v skladu z madžarskim pravom kazensko odgovarjal.
In view of the above, the request by the Court of the 2nd and 3rd District of Budapest should be treated as a request for a decision of the European Parliament to waive the immunity of Tamás Deutsch so that he can be subjected to criminal liability, as is possible under Hungarian law.
Kar zadeva veljavnost člena 8 protokola, je treba poudariti, da se obtožbe zoper Deutscha nanašajo na mnenja, ki jih je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
As far as the applicability of Article 8 of the Protocol is concerned, it should be noted that the charges brought against Tamás Deutsch refer to opinions expressed in the performance of his duties as a member of the European Parliament.
Kar zadeva člen 9, pa je – glede na dejstvo, da se obtožnica proti Deutschu nanaša na domnevno kaznivo dejanje, storjeno na Madžarskem, katere državljanstvo je imel takrat – veljavni le sledeči del: „Med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države”.
As for Article 9, given that the charges brought against Tamás Deutsch refer to an offence allegedly committed in Hungary, whose citizenship he enjoyed at the material time, the only applicable part is the one pursuant to which ‘ during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy: a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament ’.
Ugotoviti je treba, da obstaja povezava med politično dejavnostjo Deutscha in izjavami, ki jih je dal v radijski oddaji.
It has to be argued that there is a nexus between Mr Deutsch's political activity and the statements made on the radio programme.
Dejansko je Deutsch v svojih izjavah, ki jih je pritožnik navedel v sodnem pozivu, le komentiral dejstva, ki so bila javno že znana zaradi dokumentov, ki jih je poleti leta 2002 objavil časnik Népszabadaság.
As a matter of fact, in his statements reported in the writ of summons filed by the accuser Mr Deutsch merely commented on facts in the public domain based on documents which were published in the summer of 2002 in the Né pszabadas á g newspaper.
Pritožnik trdi, da so ti dokumenti ponarejeni in da njihova vsebina ni resnična ter da je medije že seznanil z nepravilnostmi v časniku Magyar Nemzet 22. avgusta 2002 in tudi kasneje.
The accuser claims that those documents were forgeries as their content did not conform to the truth and that he informed the press of the contradictions in the documents in the Magyar Nemzet newspaper on 22 August 2002 and has continued to do so since then.
Dodati je tudi treba, da so bile izjave, ki jih je Deutsch izrekel o madžarskem političnem življenju, povezane tudi z zadevami Evropske unije, saj se je pritožnik potegoval za pomemben položaj v Evropski uniji.
It should also be observed that the comments pertained to Hungarian political life and, as stated by Mr Deutsch, referred also to EU affairs in that the accuser ran for an important EU office.
Zato je treba ugotoviti, da je Deutsch le opravljal dolžnost poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, tako da je pred svojimi volivci izrazil mnenje o zadevi javnega interesa.
It must be concluded therefore that in commenting on that he was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament in expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents.
Skratka, Deutsch je le opravljal svoje delo kot poslanec Evropskega parlamenta.
In short, Mr Deutsch was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament.
Poskusi, da se poslance Evropskega parlamenta utiša pri izražanju mnenj o zadevah, za katere obstajata legitimni javni interes in zaskrbljenost, tako, da se proti njim sproži sodne postopke, so v demokratični družbi nesprejemljivi in kršijo člen 9 protokola, katerega namen je varovati svobodo izražanja poslancev pri izvrševanju njihovih dolžnosti v interesu Parlamenta kot institucije.
To seek to gag Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern by bringing legal proceedings is unacceptable in a democratic society and in breach of Article 9 of the Protocol, which is intended to protect Members' freedom of expression in the performance of their duties in the interests of Parliament as an Institution.
Na podlagi zgoraj povedanega in listin, ki so na voljo, je treba ugotoviti, da se Tamásu Deutschu ne bi smelo odvzeti poslanske imunitete.
On the basis of the foregoing and the available documents, it has to be concluded that Tamás Deutsch's immunity should not be waived.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov in v skladu s členom 6(2) poslovnika ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti odvzemu poslančeve imunitete Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament Tamásu Deutschu poslanske imunitete ne odvzame.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after considering the reasons for and against waiving the Member’s immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should not waive the parliamentary immunity of Tamás Deutsch.
o vlogi žensk v kmetijstvu in na podeželju
on the role of women in agriculture and rural areas
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti njenih členov 2 in 3, in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti njenih členov 8, 153 in 157,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union, particularly Articles 2 und 3 thereof, and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, particularly Articles 8, 153 and 157 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2006/144/ES z dne 20. februarja 2006 o strateških smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja (programsko obdobje 2007–2013)
– having regard to Council Decision 2006/144/EC of 20 February 2006 on Community strategic guidelines for rural development (programming period 2007 to 2013)
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
UL L 277 E 21.10.2005, str.
OJ L 277 E 21.10.2005, p.
1 ( prečiščeno besedilo 1.1.2010 ). ,
1 (consolidated version 1.1.2010). ,
UL C 66 E 20.3.2009, str.
OJ C 66 E 20.3.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepov seminarja na temo Ženske v trajnostnem razvoju podeželskih območij, ki je na pobudo španskega predsedstva EU potekal od 27. do 29. aprila 2010 v Cáceresu
– having regard to the conclusions of the seminar on ‘Women in the Sustainable Development of the Rural World’ held on 27-29 April 2010 in Cáceres on the intitative of the Spanish Presidency of the EU
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/41/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. julija 2010 o uporabi načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk, ki opravljajo samostojno dejavnost, in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 86/613/EGS
– having regard to Directive 2010/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity and repealing Council Directive 86/613/EEC
UL L 180, 15.7.2010, str.
OJ L 180, 15.7.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0016/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0016/2011 ),
Večfunkcionalna podeželska območja
Rural areas geared to multifunctionality
A. ker sta trajnostni gospodarski razvoj podeželskih območij ter dolgoročna in trajnostna sposobnost delovanja gospodarskih enot v Evropi prednostna naloga in ker bi bilo treba koristno uporabiti in razviti poseben potencial redkeje poseljenih kmetijskih območij tako, da se zagotovi njihova neprekinjena poselitev;
A. whereas the sustainable economic development of rural areas and the sustainable, long-term operational capability of economic units in Europe are priorities, and whereas the specific potential of relatively sparsely populated agricultural areas ought to be utilised and developed in a worthwhile way and so as to ensure that such areas continue to be inhabited,
B. ker se lahko – glede na okoliščine – gospodarsko in kulturno samostojne regije z delujočimi regionalnimi cikli bolj stabilno odzovejo na globalne spremembe,
B. whereas regions that are – within their respective contexts – economically and culturally autonomous, with functional regional distribution circuits, can react to global changes in a more stable way,
C. ker je učinkovito in večfunkcionalno kmetijstvo neizogibno potrebna osnova za strategije trajnostnega razvoja in daljnosežnejše podjetništvo v številnih regijah in ker ta potencial v okviru procesa večje diverzifikacije gospodarskih dejavnosti še ni bil povsod v celoti izkoriščen,
C. whereas a competitive agricultural sector geared towards multifunctionality is an essential basis for sustainable development strategies and for more far-reaching entrepreneurial activities in many regions, and whereas this type of potential, as part of a process of increased diversification of economic activity, has not yet been fully exploited in all areas,
D. ker podeželska območja posebej prizadenejo staranje prebivalstva, nizka gostota prebivalstva in upadanje njegovega števila na nekaterih območjih,
D. whereas rural areas are particularly affected by population ageing, low population density and, in some areas, depopulation,
E. ker v prihodnje zaradi demografskih sprememb, odseljevanja in splošnega zmanjšanja deleža žensk v prebivalstvu nekaterih podeželskih območjih z obstoječo infrastrukturo na podeželju ne bo več mogoče v zadostni meri zagotavljati preskrbe z blagom in storitev za vsakodnevne potrebe, osnovne medicinske oskrbe in nege, predšolskega, šolskega, poklicnega in akademskega izobraževanja in nadaljnjega usposabljanja ter bogate kulturne in prostočasne ponudbe oziroma se bo infrastruktura za preskrbo iz ekonomskih razlogov sesula,
E. whereas, in future, as a result of demographic change, emigration and a general decrease in the proportion of women in the population of many rural areas, it will either not be possible, with existing infrastructure, to ensure adequate local provision of goods and essential everyday services, basic medical treatment and care, pre-school education, schooling and vocational and academic education and further training or adequate cultural and leisure provision, or else the structures for such provision will collapse under economic pressures,
F. ker je od 26,7 milijona oseb v kmetijskem sektorju v Evropski uniji 42 % žensk in ker vsaj eno od petih kmetijskih gospodarstev (okrog 29 %) vodi ženska,
F. whereas about 42% of the 26.7 million people working regularly in agriculture in the European Union are women and at least one holding in five (around 29%) is managed by a woman,
G. ker se precejšnji prispevek žensk k lokalnemu razvoju in razvoju skupnosti premalo odraža v njihovem sodelovanju v ustreznih postopkih odločanja,
G. whereas the significant contribution made by women to local and community development is inadequately reflected in their participation in the relevant decision-making processes,
H. ker je načelo enakosti spolov temeljna zahteva strategije Evropa 2020 in ker ga je treba spodbujati, da bi povečali aktivno sodelovanje žensk v gospodarskih in družbenih dejavnostih zagotovili spoštovanje človekovih pravic,
H. whereas the principle of gender equality is a basic requirement under the Europe 2020 strategy and should be promoted in order to increase the active involvement of women in economic and social activities and to guarantee respect for human rights,
Ženske na podeželju in v podeželskem gospodarstvu
Women in the rural world and the rural economy
I. ker so se okoliščine, v katerih živijo ženske na podeželju, zaradi gospodarskih in družbenih sprememb v zadnjih desetletjih spremenile in je med njimi prišlo do večjih razlik in ker so navsezadnje ženske same sodelovale pri pobudi za te spremembe in njihovem oblikovanju, pri čemer se njihov socialno-ekonomski položaj med državami članicami, pa tudi znotraj njih zelo razlikuje,
I. whereas, against a background of economic and social change, the realities of women’s lives in rural areas have altered and become more diverse in recent decades, women themselves having played no small part in initiating and effecting the changes, and their economic and social circumstances vary widely both within and between Member States,
J. ker imajo ženske v sodobni družbi v okviru svojih posameznih družinskih in poklicnih vezi večfunkcionalno vlogo in ker jim ravno ta raznolikost vlog omogoča, da pomembno prispevajo k napredku in inovacijam na vseh ravneh družbe in k večji kakovosti življenja, zlasti na podeželju,
J. whereas women in today’s society assume multifunctional roles in the context of their individual family and occupational ties, and this very multiplicity of roles enables them to contribute significantly to progress and innovation at all levels of society and to the improvement of quality of life, especially in rural areas,
K. ker je zlasti na podeželskih območjih skrb za družino in starejše pogosto v rokah žensk,
K. whereas, especially in rural areas, family care and care for the elderly are frequently provided by women,