natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
6. poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s pobudo za evropsko pogodbeno pravo prouči nekatere težave, s katerimi se srečujejo potrošniki in podjetja pri čezmejnem trgovanju, zlasti tiste, ki so povezane z vlaganjem, plačevanjem, dostavo, jezikovnimi ovirami, odškodninami ter razlikami v pravni, upravni in kulturni tradiciji;
Calls on the Commission to examine, in relation to the European Contract Law initiative, certain difficulties that consumers and business encounter in cross-border commerce, especially those that are related to investments, payment, delivery, language barriers, redress and differences in legal, administrative and cultural traditions;
8. meni, da bi lahko skupno evropsko pogodbeno pravo izboljšalo delovanje notranjega trga, ne da bi vplivalo na nacionalno pogodbeno pravo držav članic;
Takes the view that a common European Contract Law could make the internal market more efficient without affecting Member States’ national systems of contract law;
10. ugotavlja, da si je treba prizadevati za različno oblikovanje pogodbenega prava za pogodbe B2B in pogodbe B2C, zaradi spoštovanja do skupnih tradicij nacionalnih pravnih sistemov in s posebno pozornostjo, posvečeno varstvu šibkejše pogodbene stranke, se pravi potrošnikov;
Notes that the contract law provisions governing B2B and B2C contracts respectively should be framed differently, out of respect for the shared traditions of national legal systems and in order to place special emphasis on the protection of the weaker contractual party, namely consumers;
12. poudarja, da je posebno pomembno olajšati e-trgovino v EU, ki ni dovolj razvita, in da je treba oceniti, ali bi razlike med nacionalnimi sistemi pogodbenega prava lahko pomenile oviro za razvoj tega sektorja, ki ga podjetja in potrošniki pravilno obravnavajo kot potencialno gonilo razvoja v prihodnosti;
Emphasises the particular importance of facilitating e-commerce in the EU, given that this sector is underdeveloped, and considers it necessary to assess whether differences between national contract law systems could represent an obstacle to the development of that sector, which has rightly been identified by businesses and consumers as a potential motor for future growth;
14. poudarja, da je na področju zavarovalnega pogodbenega prava predhodno delo že opravljeno z Načeli evropskega zavarovalnega pogodbenega prava, ki bi jih bilo treba vključiti v sklop evropskega pogodbenega prava ter jih pregledati in nadalje uresničevati;
Stresses that, in the field of insurance contract law, preliminary work has already been performed with the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law (PEICL), which should be integrated into a body of European contract law and should be revised and pursued further;
17. opozarja, da bi bilo za potrošnike to dodatno breme in da bi morali za ozaveščeno izbiro poznati dva sistema pogodbenega prava; meni, da brez preproste razlage z navedenimi prednostmi in pomanjkljivostmi obeh možnosti potrošniki ne bi mogli premišljeno izbrati;
Points out that for consumers it would be an additional burden and in order to make an informed choice, knowledge of the two sets of contract law would be necessary: unless explained in simple terms with pros and cons of both options stated it would not be possible for consumers to make a meaningful choice;
19. meni, da mora vsaka pobuda za evropsko pogodbeno pravo na področju B2C vzpostaviti zelo visoko raven varstva potrošnikov, če pa želijo države članice zagotoviti še višjo raven varstva potrošnikov, potrošniki ne smejo biti prikrajšani za dostop do te zaščite;
Takes the view that any initiative on European Contract Law in the B2C sphere must establish a very high level of consumer protection and that, should Member States nevertheless guarantee a higher level of protection, consumers should not be deprived of access to this protection;
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Gianni Pittella, Mitro Repo, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Catherine Stihler, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Gianni Pittella, Mitro Repo, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Catherine Stihler, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Damien Abad, Cornelis de Jong, Ashley Fox, Constance Le Grip, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Antonyia Parvanova, Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Amalia Sartori
Damien Abad, Cornelis de Jong, Ashley Fox, Constance Le Grip, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Antonyia Parvanova, Sylvana Rapti, Amalia Sartori
5. meni, da bi moral tak instrument pri predpisovanju splošnih določb temeljiti na načelu lex generalis , nad katerim bi prevladala morebitna posebna zakonodaja na nacionalni ravni ali ravni Skupnosti, zagotavljati pa bi moral visoko raven pravnega varstva;
Considers that such an instrument should be based on the Lex Generalis principle of prescribing general provisions which would be overridden should special legislation exist at national or Community level and provided that it ensures a higher level of legal protection;
11. v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi tudi, da bo instrument evropskega pogodbenega prava v pogodbah zahteval jasen, vsakdanji jezik, ki ga bodo potrošniki lahko razumeli, ter upošteval jezikovno zaščito državljanov, ki govorijo katerega koli od uradnih jezikov držav članic;
In this respect, calls on the Commission also to ensure that the European Contract Law instrument requires contracts to be in clear, everyday language, so that consumers can understand the terms, and to take account of the linguistic protection of citizens speaking any of the official languages in Member States;
Marta Andreasen, Sophie Auconie, Lajos Bokros, David Casa, Robert Goebbels, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Carl Haglund, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Jiří Maštálka, Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Gianluca Susta
Marta Andreasen, Sophie Auconie, Lajos Bokros, David Casa, Robert Goebbels, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Carl Haglund, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Jiří Maštálka, Sylvana Rapti, Gianluca Susta
o vmesnem pregledu evropskih satelitskih radio-navigacijskih programov: ocena izvajanja, prihodnji izzivi in obeti za financiranje
on the mid-term review of the European satellite navigation programmes: implementation assessment, future challenges and financing perspectives
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. junija 2007
– having regard to its resolution of 20 June 2007
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o nadaljevanju izvajanja evropskih satelitskih navigacijskih programov (EGNOS in Galileo)
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo)
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (EU) št. 912/2010 o ustanovitvi Agencije za evropski GNSS
– having regard to Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, setting up the European GNSS Agency
UL L 176, 20.10.2010, str.
OJ L 176, 20.10.2010, p.11. ,
– ob upoštevanju tržnega poročila o GNSS Agencije za evropski GNSS (iz oktobra 2010),
– having regard to the ‘GNSS Market Report’ of the European GNSS Agency (October 2010),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o pregledu proračuna EU ( KOM(2010)0700 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Communication ‘The EU Budget Review’ ( COM(2010)0700 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z naslovom Vmesni pregled evropskih programov satelitske navigacije ( KOM(2011)0005 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Report ‘Mid-term review of the European satellite radio navigation programmes’ ( COM(2011)0005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve in Odbora za proračun ( A7-0165/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0165/2011 ),
A. ker Evropski parlament dosledno v celoti podpira evropski globalni satelitski navigacijski sistem (GNSS), ki se izvaja prek programov Galileo in EGNOS, njegov namen pa je izboljšanje vsakdanjega življenja evropskih državljanov, zagotavljanje avtonomije in neodvisnosti Evrope ter pridobitev znatnega deleža na svetovnem trgu visoke tehnologije, odvisnem od satelitske navigacije,
A. whereas the European Parliament has consistently given its full support to the European Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), implemented through the Galileo and EGNOS programmes, aiming at improving the everyday life of European citizens, ensuring Europe’s autonomy and independence, and acquiring a significant share in the worldwide high-tech market dependent on satellite navigation,
B. ker je EU trenutno odvisna od ameriškega globalnega sistema za določanje položaja (GPS), saj na njem temeljijo dejavnosti v vrednosti okoli 7 % BDP,
B. whereas the EU is currently dependent on the US Global Positioning System (GPS), with activities worth around 7% of GDP reliant on it,
C. ker naj bi Galileo po pričakovanjih omogočal jasne prednosti v primerjavi z GPS-om, in sicer večjo natančnost, globalno celovitost, avtentikacijo in jamstvo storitve, z njim pa bo Unija dobila tudi strateško avtonomnost,
C. whereas Galileo is expected to offer advantages compared to GPS, such as improved accuracy, global integrity, authentication and guarantee of service, as well as to give the Union strategic autonomy,
D. ker globalni trg za GNSS raste eksponentno in bo po nekaterih ocenah leta 2020 dosegel približno 150 milijard EUR, od tega pa bo v EU ustvarjenih manj kot 20 %,
D. whereas the global GNSS market is growing exponentially, estimated to reach around EUR 150 billion in 2020, of which less than 20% is generated in the EU,
E. ker EGNOS vsakodnevno uporablja že 80.000 evropskih kmetov in je bil nedavno potrjen za civilno letalstvo ter ker naj bi certifikacija za pomorski promet po pričakovanjih sledila v bližnji prihodnosti,
E. whereas EGNOS is already used on a daily basis by 80 000 European farmers and was recently certified for civil aviation, and whereas certification for maritime transport is expected to follow in the near future,
F. ker naj bi Galileo postal tehnološko najbolj napreden in najsodobnejši globalni satelitski navigacijski sistem na svetu, ki bi določal svetovni standard za prihodnost, združeval visoko stopnjo znanosti, naprednih tehnologij in izkušenih kadrov ter prispeval k inovacijam in konkurenčnosti industrije EU,
F. whereas Galileo is aiming to become the technologically most advanced, state-of-the-art GNSS in the world, able to set the global standard for the future, involving a high concentration of science, advanced technologies and skilled human resources, contributing to innovation and the competitiveness of EU industry,
G. ker bosta EGNOS in Galileo ustvarila 60 milijard EUR neposrednih koristi za gospodarstvo in družbo EU, in sicer v obliki večje varnosti v cestnem in letalskem prometu, manjšega onesnaženja zraka in porabe pesticidov, novih delovnih mest in javne varnosti ter bosta v primerjavi z drugimi primerljivimi naložbami prinesla zelo veliko stroškovno učinkovitost,
G. whereas EGNOS and Galileo will generate EUR 60 billion of indirect benefits to the EU economy and society, in the form of enhanced road and aviation security, reduced air pollution and pesticide consumption, new jobs and public safety, generating very significant value for money compared to other comparable investments,
H. ker je pri štirih globalnih in dveh regionalnih satelitskih navigacijskih sistemih, ki jih razvijajo različni mednarodni akterji, hitrost, s katero se dajo storitve na voljo, bistveni element za Galileo, če naj ta evropski sistem čim prej postane drug velik referenčni globalni satelitski navigacijski sistem,
H. whereas with the building-up of four global and two regional satellite navigation systems by different international actors, speed in making services available is a vital element for Galileo in order for this European system to become, as rapidly as possible, an alternative major GNSS reference system of choice,
I. ker je neuspeh začetnega javno-zasebnega partnerstva za financiranje programov GNSS leta 2007 privedel do odločitve, da se bo izvajanje financiralo izključno iz proračuna Unije (3,4 milijarde EUR za fazo opredelitve, fazo potrditve in uvajalno fazo do leta 2013), posledično pa bo Evropska unija imela popolno lastništvo, zaradi česar bosta Galileo in EGNOS prva velika projekta te vrste v lastništvu EU;
I. whereas the failure of the initial public-private partnership for funding the GNSS programmes led in 2007 to the decision to pursue their implementation with financing drawn exclusively from the Union budget (EUR 3.4 billion for the definition, validation and deployment phases up to 2013), and consequently with full ownership by the European Union, leading to Galileo and EGNOS being the first major EU-owned projects of this type,
J. ker je Galileo civilni sistem pod civilnim nadzorom in bi morale biti vse njegove storitve z mednarodnim vesoljskim pravom, pogodbami EU in načeli, določenimi v Ustanovni listini in pogodbah OZN,
J. whereas Galileo is a civil system under civil control and all its services should comply with international space law, the EU Treaties, and the principles laid down in the UN Charter and Treaties,
K. ker zaradi povečanih stroškov programa, ki so med drugim posledica netočnih ocen stroškov in strategij obvladovanja stroškov, sedanji proračun dopušča le financiranje začetne operativne zmogljivosti, ki zajema 18 satelitov,
K. whereas increased programme costs, due among other things to inaccurate cost forecasts and cost management strategies, mean that the current budget can only fund the deployment of Initial Operating Capacity (IOC), comprising 18 satellites,
L. ker mora Komisija, preden bo sprejeta odločitev o nadaljnjih finančnih zavezah iz proračuna EU za naslednji večletni finančni okvir, predstaviti jasno oceno vseh mogočih tehničnih možnosti ter povezanih stroškov in koristi,
L. whereas, before a decision is made on a further financial commitment from the EU budget in the next multiannual financial framework, a clear assessment of all the possible technical options and related costs and benefits needs to be presented by the Commission,
Vmesni pregled: ocena izvajanja
Mid-term review: assessment of implementation
Finančno stanje
Financial situation
v zvezi s tem meni, da bi bilo treba popolno operativno zmogljivost doseči najkasneje do leta 2018, za kar bi po mnenju Komisije bilo po ocenah potrebnih dodatnih 1,9 milijarde EUR in letno financiranje za kritje operativnih stroškov v višini približno 800 milijonov EUR od leta 2014 naprej; poziva Komisijo, naj si dejavno prizadeva za kar največje prihranke iz naslova finančne učinkovitosti in vzpostavi ustrezno finančno strukturo (ob tem pa upošteva, med drugim, prihodke od komercialnih storitev Galilea), da bi omejila potrebno dodatno financiranje;
Deplores the fact that no proposal has been made to provide additional financing for this programme by readjusting the current multiannual financial framework, which has led to further delays, additional costs and possibly the loss of a ‘window of opportunity’; believes, in that light, that FOC should be reached by 2018 at the latest, which, according to the Commission, is estimated to require additional financing of EUR 1.9 billion and annual funding to cover operating costs of approximately EUR 800 million from 2014 onwards; calls on the Commission to actively pursue all possible financial efficiency savings and to put in place an appropriate financing structure (taking into account, among other things, the revenues from Galileo’s Commercial Service) to limit the necessary additional financing;
10. poudarja, da je treba povečati sredstva, da bi okrepili razvoj aplikacij in storitev na podlagi globalnega satelitskega navigacijskega sistema., da se zagotovi popolna izraba naložb v infrastrukturo sistema Galileo ter razvoj vseh zmogljivosti tega sistema;
Stresses the need to increase funding with a view to enhancing the development of GNSS applications and services, which is essential in order to ensure that the infrastructure investment which Galileo represents is fully exploited and that the Galileo system is developed to its full capacity;
11. je trdno prepričan, da je dodatna sredstva za globalni satelitski navigacijski sistem mogoče zagotoviti le, če se pri nosilcih odločanja in širši javnosti poveča ozaveščenost o njegovih koristih za gospodarstvo in družbo EU; pozdravlja ustanovitev konkretnih pobud, kot so letno tekmovanje za zamisli Galileo Masters z več kot 350 prispevki iz 44 držav v letu 2010, otroško tekmovanje Galileo in nagrada za inovativnost v zvezi z globalnim satelitskim navigacijskim sistemom;
Is strongly convinced that additional funding for GNSS can only be secured if awareness of the benefits for the EU economy and society brought by GNSS is raised considerably among decision-makers and the wider public; applauds the setting-up of concrete initiatives, such as the annual Galileo Masters competition for ideas, for which there were 350 entries from 44 countries in 2010, the Galileo children’s competition and the GNSS innovation prize;
Mednarodna razsežnost
International dimension
Prihodnji izzivi: financiranje in upravljanje
Future challenges: financing and governance
– tehničnih specifikacijah (točnost, geografska pokritost, celovitost itd.) za storitve (odprte storitve, varstvo človeškega življenja, komercialne storitve, regulirane javne storitve), ki bi jih lahko zagotovile različne konfiguracije satelitov sistema Galileo (vključno z začetno operativno zmogljivostjo in popolno operativno zmogljivostjo, ob uporabi skupaj z drugimi sistemi GNSS ali samostojno);
- the technical specifications (accuracy, geographical coverage, integrity, etc.) for the services (Open Services, Safety of Life, Commercial Services, Public Regulated Services) that the various Galileo satellite configurations could provide (including IOC and FOC, used in combination with other GNSS systems or on a stand-alone basis);
– vlogi storitev EGNOS v zvezi z različnimi možnimi konfiguracijami satelitov sistema Galileo ter ali naj se EGNOS ohrani v primeru popolne operativne zmogljivosti ali ne;
- the role of EGNOS services with regard to the various possible Galileo configurations and whether or not EGNOS should be kept in a FOC constellation;
20. meni, da bi bilo treba nepričakovane dodatne stroške financirati iz proračuna Skupnosti brez ogrožanja drugih obstoječih programov; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj oceni možnost ustanovitve „rezervnega sklada Galileo“ za pokritje takih nepričakovanih stroškov;
Believes that unexpected additional costs should be financed from the Community budget without endangering other existing programmes; calls, in this respect, on the Commission to assess the possibility of establishing a ‘Galileo reserve fund’ to cover such unexpected costs;
22. poudarja pomen popolne preglednosti, finančne ustreznosti, upravičenosti in kolikor je mogoče odgovornega upravljanja vseh dolgoročnih struktur upravljanja GNSS; v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da bi bilo potrebno redno usklajevanje s Svetom in Evropskim parlamentom, ki bi moralo vključevati podrobne tekoče informacije;
Stresses the importance of any long-term governance and management structure of GNSS being fully transparent, financially sound and accountable and managed in the most responsible manner possible; notes, in this regard, that coordination with the Council and the European Parliament should take place on a regular basis and should include detailed updates;
Evropska unija je naredila pomemben korak s svojo politično odločitvijo, zapisano v Uredbi 683/2008, da se uvede samostojen evropski globalni satelitski navigacijski sistem (GNSS), ki se izvaja prek programov Galileo in EGNOS, v skladu z nadzorom in upravljanjem EU.
The EU took an important step with its political decision enshrined in Regulation 683/2008 to put in place an autonomous European Global Satellite Navigation Systems (GNSS) (Galileo and EGNOS) under EU ownership and under EU management.
To sporočilo je vmesni pregled te pomembne pobude, ki ocenjuje dosedanji napredek in izvajanje ter začetek razprave o prihodnjem upravljanju, uporabi in financiranju.
This Communication is a mid-term review of this flagship initiative, assessing the process and implementation so far and launching the debate on its future governance, exploitation and financing.
Galileo – kratek opis
Galileo – A brief outline
Galileo in EGNOS (skupna evropska geostacionarna navigacijska storitev, dopolnilni sistem, ki izboljšuje natančnost in zanesljivost informacij ameriškega globalnega sistema za določanje položaja) tvorita globalni satelitski navigacijski sistem, ki ga je razvila EU.
Galileo , together with EGNOS (European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service, an augmentation system that improves the accuracy and the reliability of US' Global Positioning System (GPS) information), is the GNSS developed by the EU.
Glavna razloga, ki sta privedla EU k odločitvi, da vzpostavi svoj globalni satelitski navigacijski sistem, sta neodvisnost Evrope od drugih globalnih navigacijskih sistemov in samostojnost ter pridobitev dela tega izjemno hitro rastočega svetovnega trga visoke tehnologije, na katerem zdaj pretežno prevladujejo ZDA.
Two main reasons have led the EU to the decision of setting up its own global satellite navigation system: Europe’s independence from other global navigation systems and autonomy, and secondly, to get a share in this tremendously growing worldwide high-tech market , which is today to a large extent dominated by the US.
Galileo bo kot druga generacija satelitskega navigacijskega sistema ponudil številne nadgradnje signalov, kar se bo kazalo v izboljšani natančnosti , večji odpornosti proti večsteznemu odsevanju in motnjam, skupaj z globalno integriteto in konceptom avtentikacije pa bo zagotovil glavno razlikovanje od GPS-a in ruskega navigacijskega sistema GLONASS.
As a second generation satellite navigation system, Galileo will offer several signal enhancements resulting in improved accuracy , more resistance against multi-path reflections and interference and will provide with global integrity and the authentication concept a main differentiator to the GPS and Russia’s Global'naya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema (GLONASS).
Poleg tega je Galileo za razliko od sistemov GPS in GLONASS zasnovan kot civilni sistem pod civilnim nadzorom, kar pomeni, da je zagotovljena neprekinjenost storitve.
Furthermore, unlike GPS and GLONASS, Galileo is designed as a ‘civil system under civil control’, meaning that continuity of service is guaranteed.
Slednja točka je precej pomembna, če upoštevamo, da je danes več kot 7 % BDP EU (skupaj s finančnim sektorjem, prometom, telekomunikacijami, električnimi omrežji in sistemi za trgovanje z delnicami) odvisnega od razpoložljivosti sistema GPS.
This last point is quite important if one keeps in mind that today more than 7% of EU GDP (including financial sector, transport, telecommunications, power grids and stock trading systems) is dependent on the availability of GPS.
Zato bo (začasno) omejevanje ali poslabšanje signalov GPS močno vplivalo na gospodarstvo in družbo, če ne bo še enega samostojnega globalnega satelitskega navigacijskega sistema.
Therefore, a (temporary) limitation or degradation of GPS signals will have tremendous effects on our economy and society, without other independent GNSS systems in place.
Projekt Galileo se izvaja v štirih fazah:
The Galileo project is carried out in four phases: