natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izkazalo se je torej, da je treba vzpostaviti povezavo s konvencijo o iskanju in reševanju na morju iz leta 1979.
The link with the Search and Rescue Convention of 1979 (SAR) concerning the rescue of human lives was then clarified.
· Pravično obravnavanje kapitana in posadke v primeru nezgode
· Fair treatment of masters and crews in the event of an accident
· Posledice odsotnosti potrdila o zavarovanju ali finančnega jamstva
· Consequences of absence of an insurance certificate or financial guarantee
Prišlo je do jasnega zapisa, po katerem to, da plovilo ni opremljeno s potrdilom o zavarovanju ali finančnem jamstvu, ni zadosten razlog, da bi država članica zavrnila sprejem ladje v stiski.
It was clarified that the absence of an appropriate insurance certificate would not in itself be considered a sufficient reason not to accommodate a ship in distress.
Po političnem dogovoru o vprašanju civilne odgovornosti (eden od „manjkajočih dveh“) bo možno ponovno vključiti sklicevanje nanjo.
Following the political agreement on the civil liability dossier (one of the "missing two") the references to it could be reintroduced.
· Načrt za povračilo škode pribežališčem in pristaniščem
· Compensation schemes for places of refuge and ports
Parlament se je v zadnjih nekaj letih večkrat zavzel za sistem povračil za take primere, kar bi mogoče lahko prispevalo k manjšemu odporu pristanišč pred sprejemom ladij v stiski.
Parliament has repeatedly called in recent years for a compensation scheme for such cases which might help to reduce any resistance of ports to providing refuge.
Ker tak sistem za Svet ni bil sprejemljiv, je bil sprejet kompromis, po katerem se Komisijo pozove, naj prouči in s poročilom pred koncem 2011 predlaga različne politične možnosti.
Since such a scheme was not acceptable to Council a compromise was found asking the Commission to examine and put forward different policy options in a report to be presented by the end of 2011.
Dosežen je bil kompromis, da morajo goriva prijaviti ladje z bruto tonažo 1000 ton in več.
A compromise was found according to which any bunker oil on ships above 1000 gross tonnage would have to be notified.
· Uporaba sistemov samodejnega prepoznavanja (AIS) za ribiška plovila
· Introduction of automatic identification system (AIS) for fishing vessels
Parlament se je strinjal s Svetom glede tega, naj bodo mala ribiška plovila, daljša od 15 metrov, opremljena s sistemom samodejnega prepoznavanja (AIS).
Parliament agreed with the Council to equip small fishing vessels as of 15 meters with AIS.
Za mala ribiška plovila je to precej pomembno, saj je prav ta kategorija plovil pogosto udeležena v trčenja s smrtnim izidom med člani posadke.
This is clearly of value to small fishing vessels since this is the category of vessel frequently involved in collisions with fatal consequences for the crew.
Ker je sporazum precej bolj daljnosežen, kot je bilo mogoče upati na začetku postopka, delegacija Parlamentu priporoča sprejetje skupnega besedila v tretji obravnavi.
As the agreement reached goes much further than what was possible at earlier stages of the procedure, the delegation recommends that the Parliament approves the joint text at 3rd reading.
S soglasjem k temu besedilu bo Parlament zapolnil pomemben del zakonodajnega okvira, potrebnega, da se preprečijo nove pomorske nesreče, kot sta bili Erika in Prestige.
With the approval of this text, Parliament is achieving an important part of the legislative framework necessary to avoid a repetition of the successive maritime disasters we had with the Erika and the Prestige.
Z direktivo bodo države članice ob nezgodah prisiljene izdelati celovit „scenarij“.
This Directive will force Member States to work out a complete "scenario" for when an accident occurs.
Poročevalec upa, da države članice ne bodo čakale do leta 2011 in šele takrat sprejele potrebne ukrepe za njeno izvajanje.
Your rapporteur hopes that the Member States won't wait for 2011 to take the necessary measures to implement this Directive.
Poleg tega direktiva odseva dosežen napredek pri usklajevanju izmenjave elektronskih podatkov, kar pomeni, da bo omogočila še večjo optimalizacijo in integracijo evropskega sistema spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet.
Furthermore this Directive reflects the progress made towards harmonising electronic data exchange and will thus allow the further optimisation and integration of the European vessel traffic monitoring and information system.
Skupno besedilo Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/59/ES o vzpostavitvi sistema spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/59/EC establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi temeljnih načel za preiskovanje nesreč v sektorju pomorskega prometa in o spremembi direktiv 1999/35/ES in 2002/59/ES, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Directives 1999/35/EC and 2002/59/EC
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi temeljnih načel za preiskovanje nesreč v sektorju pomorskega prometa in o spremembi direktiv 1999/35/ES in 2002/59/ES, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Directives 1999/35/EC and 2002/59/EC
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3723/2008 – C6‑0046/2009 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3723/2008 – C6‑0046/2009 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 24.9.2009, P6_TA(2008)0444 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0444 . on the Council common position
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2008)0827 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2008)0827 )
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru (A6‑0000/2009),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0101/2009 ),
S sedmimi predlogi, ki ga sestavljajo, naj bi preprečili nesreče (zaradi večje kakovosti evropskih zastav, revizije predpisov o pomorski inšpekciji in spremljanju ladijskega prometa ter boljših pravil za klasifikacijske zavode) in omogočili učinkovit odziv v primeru nesreče (z usklajenim okvirom za preiskavo nesreč, novimi pravili o nadomestilih za potnike v primeru nesreče in novimi pravili o odgovornosti lastnikov ladij in obveznem zavarovanju).
Its seven proposals aim at preventing accidents (by improving the quality of European flags, reviewing the legislation on port state control and vessel traffic monitoring and by improving the rules relating to classification societies) and ensuring an effective response in case of an accident (by developing a harmonised framework for accident investigation, introducing rules on compensation of passengers in case of an accident and by introducing rules on ship-owners' liability coupled with a mandatory insurance scheme).
Ta predlog direktive o določitvi temeljnih načel za vodenje preiskav nesreč v sektorju pomorskega prometa in o spremembi direktiv 1999/35/ES in 2002/59/ES je Komisija sprejela dne 23. novembra 2005.
The proposal for a Directive establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Directives 1999/35/EC and 2002/59/EC was adopted by the Commission on 23.11.2005.
Kot tudi drugi predlogi tretjega pomorskega paketa tudi ta predlog vključuje priporočila odbora MARE, ki je bil še posebej zaskrbljen zaradi zelo počasnega napredka pri preiskavi nesreče Prestige.
Like the other proposals of the 3rd Maritime Package it includes recommendations made by MARE which was in particular concerned with the very slow progress of the investigations following the Prestige accident.
Bistveni namen tega predloga je oblikovati jasne in zavezujoče smernice na ravni EU za izvajanje tehničnih preiskav ladijskih nesreč ter zagotavljanje izmenjave izkušenj, da bi preprečili nesreče v prihodnje.
The fundamental aim of this proposal is to establish clear and binding guidelines at EU level on how to carry out technical investigations into shipping accidents and to provide feedback to prevent accidents in the future.
V ta namen vključuje na primer določbe o obveznem izvajanju tehničnih preiskav po nesrečah, statusu in metodah tovrstnih preiskav, poročanju, vzpostavitvi evropske baze podatkov za pomorske nesreče ter varnostnih priporočilih za izmenjavo izkušenj, da bi preprečili nesreče v prihodnje.
To this end it includes, for example, provisions on the obligation to carry out technical investigations after accidents, the status and methods of such investigations, reporting, a European database for marine casualties and safety recommendations to serve as a feedback to prevent further accidents.
Parlament je v prvem branju sprejel 24 predlogov sprememb, ki so zajemali vprašanja, kot so ločitev med preiskovanjem nesreč in kazenskim preiskovanjem, nerazkritje evidenc, zaščita prič, neodvisnost in pooblastila preiskovalnih organov, sodelovanje EMSA, roki za začetek preiskav, preprečevanje vzporednih preiskav, komitologija, pravično obravnavanje mornarjev in mehanizmi za izmenjavo izkušenj.
In its 1st reading Parliament had adopted 24 amendments covering issues like the differentiation of accident investigations from criminal ones, the non-disclosure of records, the protection of witnesses, the independence and the powers of the investigative body, the involvement of EMSA, the deadline for starting investigations, the avoidance of parallel investigations, comitology, the fair treatment of seafarers and the feedback mechanisms.
Skupno stališče je vključevalo le nekaj predlogov sprememb Parlamenta, zlasti v zvezi s komitologijo.
The common position included only a few of the EP's amendments, notably on comitology.
Poleg tega je zajemalo nove elemente, kot so omejitev področja uporabe na zelo resne nesreče in bolj prilagodljiva metodologija, ki bi države članice zavezovala le k upoštevanju „načel“ skupne metodologije.
In addition, it included new elements like the limitation of the scope to very serious accidents and a more flexible methodology obliging Member States only to follow the "principles" of a common methodology.
Pogajanja so potekala med drugo obravnavo, kot za vse ostale predloge.
Like for the other files negotiations took place during 2nd reading.
Za ta predlog je potekalo tristransko srečanje, s katerim je bil dosežen napredek v zvezi z več manj pomembnimi točkami.
For this file one trialogue took place making some progress on more minor points.
Po neuspešnih pogajanjih je Parlament v drugi obravnavi 24. septembra 2008 ponovno vložil večino predlogov sprememb iz prve obravnave in zavrnil večino novih elementov iz skupnega stališča, saj so si prizadevali za spremembo direktive v zgolj neobvezujoče priporočilo.
Following the failure of the negotiations Parliament reinstated in 2nd reading on 24.9.2008 most of its amendments from 1st reading and rejected most new elements in the common position, as these tried to change the directive to just an unbinding recommendation.
Po glasovanju ob drugi obravnavi 24. septembra 2008 in zaradi politične volje, da se spravni postopek zaključi v času francoskega predsedovanja, je Parlament zelo hitro 7. oktobra 2008 ustanovil delegacijo v spravnem postopku, ki jo je vodila evropska poslanka Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou.
Following the 2nd reading vote of 24.9.2008 and given the political will to conclude the conciliation under the French Presidency the Parliament's conciliation delegation was constituted very quickly on 7.10.2008, led by Mrs Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, MEP.
Razprava o tem predlogu se je začasno zaključila po dveh tristranskih srečanjih, ki sta potekali 4. novembra in 2. decembra, ter neformalnem srečanju 13. novembra.
Discussions on this file were provisionally concluded after the two trialogues of 4.11. and 2.12. and an informal meeting on 13.11.
Velik napredek je bil dosežen tudi po novih predlogih Coreperja ter izmenjavi kompromisnih predlogov med službami Komisije in poročevalcem pred temi srečanji.
A lot of progress was also made following new proposals from Coreper and exchanges of compromise proposals from the Commission services and the rapporteur prior to these meetings.
Vprašanje zaupnosti evidenc je bilo rešeno, potem ko se je poročevalec neuradno posvetoval z evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov.
The issue of confidentiality of records was solved following an informal consultation of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) by the rapporteur.
Njegova priporočila sta sprejela tako Parlament kot tudi Svet.
His recommendations were accepted both by the Parliament and the Council.
Med spravnim postopkom se je dosegel dogovor o večini nerešenih vprašanj, kar je bistveno okrepilo in izboljšalo določbe direktive.
During conciliation compromises on most of the outstanding issues were found which considerably strengthen and improve the provisions of the Directive.
Glavne točke dogovora so:
The key points of the agreement reached are:
· Področje uporabe: Po umiku predlogov sprememb za vključitev klicev v sili v področje uporabe direktive (predlogi sprememb 3, 7, 8, 10, 14, 17, 20) je Parlamentu uspelo prepričati Svet, da je treba uvesti obvezno predhodno oceno v vseh primerih resnih nesreč (predlogi sprememb 9, 13, 14, 18, 28).
· Scope: Following the withdrawal of the amendments seeking to include distress alerts into the scope of the Directive (AMs 3, 7, 8, 10, 14, 17, 20) Parliament managed to convince Council to create an obligation to make a preliminary assessment in all cases of a serious casualty (AMs 9, 13, 14, 18, 28).
Če se preiskovalni organ odloči, da ne bo opravil popolne preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo, se razlogi za takšno odločitev zabeležijo, kratek opis teh razlogov pa se vključi v Evropsko podatkovno bazo za pomorske nesreče.
In case an investigative body decides not to undertake a full safety investigation the reasons for not doing so shall be recorded and a brief description thereof will be included in the European database for marine casualties.
Možnost, da bi se po preiskavi resne nesreče pripravilo poenostavljeno poročilo, je bila izključena.
The possibility of a simplified report following an investigation of a serious casualty was excluded.
· Metodologija pri preiskovanju nesreč (predvsem predlog spremembe 15): Parlamentu je uspelo prepričati Svet, da bi delo preiskovalcev temeljilo na skupni metodologiji in ne le na načelih skupne metodologije.
· Methodology for investigating accidents (mainly AM 15): Parliament could convince Council to accept that the work of investigators be based on a common methodology and not only the principles of a common methodology.
To je bilo mogoče, potem ko je bil dosežen dogovor o primerih, v katerih se preiskovalec lahko oddalji od skupne metodologije.
This was possible following an agreement on when an investigator may depart from the common methodology.
Bilo je določeno, da je to mogoče le v posebnih primerih in pod nekaterimi pogoji.
It was laid down that this was only possible in a specific case and subject to certain conditions.
Parlament je še okrepil skupno metodologijo, in sicer s črtanjem določbe, s katero se je Komisijo in države članice pozivalo, naj oblikujejo smernice za izvajanje skupne metodologije.
Parliament further strengthened the common methodology by deleting the provision asking the Commission and Member States to develop guidelines to be used for the implementation of the common methodology.
· Odločitev glede preiskave (predvsem predlogi sprememb 16, 18, 19, 20): Prvotno je Parlament predlagal, da bi z odločitvijo Komisije preprečili vzporedne preiskave več držav članic.
· Decision on the investigation (mainly AMs 16, 18, 19, 20): Initially Parliament had proposed to avoid parallel investigations by several Member States into the same accident by a decision of the Commission.
Med pogajanji pa je sprejel možnost izvajanja vzporednih preiskav v izrednih in ustrezno utemeljenih primerih (na primer zaradi narodnosti žrtev, mesta nesreče ali zastave ladje).
During the negotiations Parliament accepted that in exceptional and duly justified cases (for example because of the nationality of the victims, the location of the accident or the flag of the ship) parallel investigations could be conducted.
Parlament pa je vseeno uspel okrepiti načelo ene preiskave in opredeliti zelo omejene primere, v katerih lahko potekajo vzporedne preiskave.
Parliament succeeded, however, in strengthening the principle of one investigation and in defining the possibility for parallel investigations in a very restricted way.
Poleg tega je Svet sprejel predlog spremembe, s katerim je Parlament zahteval, da se preiskava v vsakem primeru začne najkasneje v dveh mesecih po nesreči.
In addition, Council accepted Parliament's amendment requiring an investigation to start in any event no later than two months after the accident.
· Pravično obravnavanje mornarjev (predloga spremembe 1 in 33): V predloga sprememb so bila vključena ista besedila, kot so bila dogovorjena v predlogu g.
· Fair treatment of seafarers (AMs 1, 33): The same texts as agreed in the dossier of M. Sterckx on vessel traffic monitoring were included here.
· Zaščita prič/zaupnost evidenc (predlogi sprememb 12, 22, 23, 25): Člen o zaupnosti je bil po posvetovanju z evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov ponovno oblikovan.
· Protection of witnesses/Confidentiality of records (AMs 12, 22, 23, 25): Following the advice of the EDPS the Article on confidentiality was rewritten.
Pojasnjeno je bilo, da se uporablja direktiva o varstvu podatkov (v ta namen se je dodala tudi standardna uvodna izjava), vključilo pa se je novo besedilo za skladnost z določbami o varstvu podatkov in dostopu do dokumentov.
It was clarified that the data protection directive applies (also by including a standard recital to that end) and new wording was introduced to align it to the provisions on data protection and access to documents.
S tem je bil omogočen tudi umik predloga spremembe 25 o odnosih s tretjimi državami, saj bi za vsako izmenjavo podatkov s temi državami zdaj veljali predpisi direktive o varstvu podatkov.
This also allowed withdrawing AM 25 on the relations with third countries since any exchange of data with third countries would now be subject to the rules of the data protection directive.
Vključena je bila tudi uvodna izjava o zaščiti prič.
Finally, a recital on the protection of witnesses was introduced.
· Drugo: Vzajemno sprejemljive rešitve so se oblikovale tudi za številne druge predloge sprememb, na primer v zvezi s poročanjem in spremljanjem, obveznim zagotavljanjem informacij preiskovalcem ter neodvisnostjo organa, pristojnega za preiskovanje.
· Others: Mutually acceptable solutions were also found on a number of other amendments like for example reporting and follow-up, the obligation to provide information to investigators and the authority's responsible for the investigations independence.
Skupno besedilo Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi temeljnih načel za preiskovanje nesreč v sektorju pomorskega prometa in o spremembi direktiv 1999/35/ES in 2002/59/ES, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Directives 1999/35/EC and 2002/59/EC
o skupnem besedilu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odgovornosti prevoznikov potnikov po morju v primeru nesreč, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of accidents
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3724/2008 – C6‑0047/2009 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3724/2008 – C6‑0047/2009 ),
562. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0592 ),
562. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0592 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0445 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0445 . on the Council common position
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2008)0831 ),
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2008)0831 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6‑0102/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0102/2009 ),
Komisija je predlog uredbe o odgovornosti prevoznikov potnikov po morju in celinskih plovnih poteh v primeru nesreč sprejela 23. novembra 2005.
The Proposal for a Regulation on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea and inland waterways in the event of accidents was adopted by the Commission on 23.11.2005.
Končni cilj predloga je, da se po več kot desetih letih od nesreče Estonie v Baltskem morju leta 1994 na evropski ravni zagotovi podobna stopnja odgovornosti in obvezno zavarovanje prevoznikov potnikov v primeru nesreče.
Its objective is finally, after over a decade since the catastrophe of the Estonia in the Baltic Sea in 1994, to guarantee at European level a similar level of liability and the mandatory insurance of carriers of passengers in the event of an accident.
Sedanje stanje v državah članicah je, da se odgovornost določa na različnih – v nekaterih primerih precej nizkih – stopnjah, pač glede na domačo zakonodajo ali njihove mednarodne obveznosti.
Until now, this liability has been fixed at different, and in some cases rather low, levels in Member States according to their national legislation or their international commitments.
Namen predloga je odpraviti te razlike med državami članicami in v evropsko pravo vključiti določbe atenske konvencije o pomorskem prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage iz leta 1974, kakor je bila spremenjena s protokolom iz leta 2002, ki je določil višjo finančno odgovornost.
This proposal aims to remove these national differences by incorporating into European law the provisions of the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974, as amended by its protocol of 2002, which provides for higher financial liability.
Predlog prav tako prinaša nove določbe, s katerimi se atenska konvencija prilagodi evropskemu pravu in sistemom odgovornosti, ki veljajo za druge vrste prevoza.
It also adds further provisions adapting the Athens Convention to European law and liability systems of other modes of transport.
Za Parlament je pomorski paket vedno predstavljal celoto, zato je njegove posamezne dele vedno obravnaval skupaj.
For Parliament the Maritime Package was always seen as a package and for this reason its individual files were always dealt with together.
Usoda „manjkajočih dveh“, pa tudi težave pri nekaterih drugih predlogih, so pripeljale do odločitve o tem, da v drugi obravnavi ne bo dogovora o nobenem predlogu.
The fate of the "missing two" as well as difficulties in some files led to a decision not to reach a second reading agreement on any file.