natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na podlagi tega poročevalec opredeljuje številne ključne prednostne naloge za naslednji večletni finančni okvir, ki so združene v naslednje teme: znanje za rast; kohezija za rast in zaposlovanje; upravljanje naravnih virov in trajnostni razvoj; državljanstvo; in globalna Evropa.
Against this background the rapporteur identifies a number of key priorities for the next MFF grouped around the following themes: knowledge for growth; cohesion for growth and employment; management of natural resources and sustainable development; citizenship; and Global Europe.
Za vsako prednostno nalogo poročevalec postavlja proračunske in zakonodajne usmeritve.
For each priority the rapporteur sets budgetary and legislative orientations.
Trdi zlasti, da zneski, ki bodo v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru namenjeni za skupno kmetijsko politiko in kohezijsko politiko, ne bi smeli biti nižji od zneskov v tekočem obdobju finančnega načrtovanja.
It argues, in particular, that the amounts allocated to the common agricultural policy (CAP) and to cohesion policy in the next MFF should not be less than in the current financial programming period.
Struktura naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira bi morala biti realistična in bi morala olajšati kontinuiteto načrtovanja ter se izogniti pomanjkljivostim obstoječega večletnega finančnega okvira, zlasti neprilagodljivosti znotraj razdelkov.
The structure of the next MFF should be realistic, facilitate planning continuity and avoid the shortcomings of the current MFF, in particular the lack of flexibility within headings.
Kot je bilo utemeljeno, bi struktura morala odražati razsežnosti strategije Evropa 2020 v zvezi s pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rastjo ter jim zagotoviti politično prepoznavnost.
As justified earlier it should also reflect and give political visibility to the Europe 2020 dimensions of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Glede na te zahteve poročevalec predlaga, da:
In view of these requirements the rapporteur proposes:
- se vse politike, povezane s strategijo Evropa 2020, združijo v enotnem razdelku;
- to group under a single heading all Europe 2020 related policies;
- se znotraj razdelka za strategijo Evropa 2020 vzpostavijo štirje podrazdelki za povezane politike; predlaga, da se z namenom zagotoviti stabilen okvir za finančno načrtovanje za politike, v okviru katerih se porabi največ, štirim podrazdelkom zagotovi večja prilagodljivost, da bi tako zagotovili, da so proračunska sredstva ustrezno usklajena s postopnim razvojem strategije Evropa 2020;
- to establish under the Europe 2020 heading four subheadings involving linked policies; in order to provide major spending policies with a stable financial planning framework it proposes four subheadings to be endowed with enhanced flexibility in order to ensure that budgetary means are suitable aligned with the progressive development of the 2020 strategy;
- se ohranita razdelka zunanje delovanje in uprava;
- to maintain the headings of , external action, and administration;
Prilagodljivost in trajanje
Flexibility and duration
Poročevalec meni, da je večja prilagodljivost znotraj postavk in med njimi absolutno potrebna za ohranitev zmožnosti delovanja Unije.
The rapporteur believes that more flexibility within and across headings is an absolute necessity for maintaining functioning capacities of the Union.
Vmesni pregled bi moral postati pravno zavezujoča obveznost z resnično možnostjo za revizijo zgornjih meja v skladu s sklepom o lastnih sredstvih.
A Mid-term Review should become a legally binding obligation with a real possibility to revise the ceilings in compliance with the own resources decision.
Mehanizmi za revizijo bi morali predvideti poenostavljen postopek za spremembe do sprejete mejne vrednosti.
The mechanisms for revision should foresee a simplified procedure for changes under an agreed threshold.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba na vse možne načine okrepiti prilagodljivost pod zgornjimi mejami.
Further, flexibility below the ceilings should be enhanced in all possible ways.
Ključno je, da se ohrani in okrepi trenutni sistem zunajproračunskih instrumentov za prilagodljivost z nadaljnjo poenostavitvijo njihove uporabe in zagotavljanjem zadostnih sredstev zanje.
Finally, it is crucial to maintain and enhance the current system of extra-budgetary instruments for flexibility by further simplifying their use and providing them with sufficient envelopes.
Naslednji večletni finančni okvir bi moral doseči pravo ravnotežje med stabilnostjo, srednjeročno predvidljivostjo in prilagodljivostjo.
The next MFF should strike a right balance between stability, medium-term predictability and flexibility.
Prilagodljivost in trajanje sta zato tesno povezana.
Flexibility and duration are thus intimately related.
Medtem ko opozarja na dolgoletno željo Parlamenta, da se trajanje večletnega finančnega okvira zavoljo demokratične odgovornosti kar najbolj uskladi s trajanjem političnih ciklov institucij, poročevalec meni, da je petletni ciklus morda prekratek za politike, za katere so potrebni dolgoročnejši življenjski cikli načrtovanja in izvajanja.
While recalling Parliament’s longstanding will to align for reasons of democratic accountability and responsibility, as much as possible, the MFF duration with the duration of the institutions’ political cycles the rapporteur considers that a five-year cycle might be too short for policies which need a longer term programming and implementation life cycles requirements.
Po drugi strani pa bi desetletni ciklus večletnega finančnega okvira lahko predvideli le, če bi bil s Svetom dosežen dogovor o največji stopnji prilagodljivosti.
On the other hand, a ten-year MFF could only be envisaged if an agreement on maximum level of flexibility would be reached with the Council.
Poročevalec zato meni, da bi nov sedemletni večletni finančni okvir do leta 2020 lahko zagotovil večjo stabilnost z zagotavljanjem kontinuitete programov v daljšem obdobju in vzpostavil jasno povezavo s strategijo Evropa 2020.
The rapporteur, therefore, takes the view that a new 7-year MFF, set until 2020, could provide for more stability by ensuring the continuity of the programmes for a longer period, and also make a clear link with the EU 2020 strategy.
Vendar poudarja, da so za to možnost potrebne zadostne skupne zgornje meje ter ustrezna in s sredstvi dobro podprta prilagodljivost znotraj in izven okvira, da bi se izognili težavam, ki so se pojavile v obdobju 2007–2013;
He stresses, however, that this option is subject to sufficient overall ceilings and an adequate and well-resourced flexibility within and outside the framework to avoid the problems encountered during the 2007-2013 period.
Usklajevanje ambicij s sredstvi
Matching ambitions with resources
Brez zadostnih dodatnih sredstev v večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje po letu 2013 EU ne bo mogla izpolniti obstoječih prednostnih nalog politik in novih nalog iz Lizbonske pogodbe.
Without sufficient additional resources in the post-2013 MFF, the EU will not be able to fulfil both the existing policy priorities and the new tasks provided for by the Treaty of Lisbon.
Poročevalec zavrača zahtevo nekaterih držav članic za zamrznitev proračuna EU.
The rapporteur dismisses the call made by some Member States for freezing the EU’s budget.
Ta bi škodila doseganju sprejetih ciljev Unije in privedla do manj učinkovite porabe posameznih držav članic ter ne bi rešila skupnih izzivov, s katerimi se državljani EU soočajo ali se bodo soočali.
This would be detrimental for the achievement of the Union’s agreed objectives, lead to less efficient individual Member States’ spending, and fail to address the common challenges that EU citizens are or will be facing.
Reforma lastnih sredstev
Reform of own resources
Zaradi načina, kako se je razvijal sistem lastnih sredstev EU, ki so ga postopoma nadomestili nacionalni prispevki, zaradi česar se ga dojema kot hudo breme za nacionalne javne finance, je bolj kot kadar koli prej potrebna njegova reforma.
The way the EU system of own resources has evolved, gradually being replaced by national contributions and consequently being perceived as an excessive burden on national public finances, renders its reform more necessary than ever.
Nesorazmerno poudarja neto denarne tokove v države članice in iz njih ter tako slabi evropski skupni interes.
It places disproportionate emphasis on net cash flows to and from Member States diluting thus the European common interest.
Poročevalec se strinja, da bi izboljšan sistem, ki bi zagotavljal pravičnost, preglednost in zadostne proračunske prihodke, omogočil, da se proces sprejemanja proračunskih odločitev namesto na neto bilance med državami članicami osredotoči na ključne prednostne naloge EU s pravo dodano vrednostjo.
The rapporteur agrees that an improved system ensuring fairness, transparency and sufficient budget revenue, would allow the budgetary decision making-process to focus on key EU priorities with real added value, rather than net-balances between Member States.
Zlasti meni, da bi bilo treba postopno odpraviti obstoječe izjeme in popravne mehanizme, kar je nujni korak na poti zagotavljanja pravičnejšega in preglednejšega proračuna EU.
He considers, in particular, that the existing exceptions and correction mechanisms should be progressively phased out, as an indispensable step in making the EU budget more equitable and transparent.
Pogajalski proces
Negotiation process
Naslednji večletni finančni okvir je prvi, ki bo sprejet v skladu z novo Lizbonsko pogodbo, po kateri je pravno zavezujoča odobritev Parlamenta (ki jo ta sprejme z večino svojih članov), preden ga lahko sprejme Svet (s soglasjem).
The next MFF is the first one to be adopted under the new Treaty of Lisbon that makes legally binding the consent of Parliament (by the majority of its component members) before it can be adopted by Council (by unanimity).
S ciljem, da bi uspeli v tem zahtevnem postopku, in v skladu s členom 312(5) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije poročevalec Svet in Komisijo poziva, naj si na vse načine prizadevata za hitro dosego dogovora s Parlamentom o praktični metodi dela za proces pogajanj o večletnem finančnem okviru, ki bi moral vključevati tudi trdno zavezo Sveta, da bo razpravljal o predlogih o novih lastnih sredstvih.
In view of succeeding in this demanding procedure, and in compliance with Article 312(5) TFEU, the rapporteur urges the Council and the Commission to make every necessary effort to swiftly reach an agreement with Parliament on a practical working method for the MFF negotiating process that should also include a firm commitment by Council to discuss the proposals on new own resources.
za Posebni odbor za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013
for the Special Committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013
o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013
on Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe
Odbor za razvoj poziva Posebni odbor za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013 kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje predloge:
The Committee on Development calls on the Special Committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker je v številnih delih sveta ekološka degradacija eden od temeljnih vzrokov pomanjkanja in ker lahko neupoštevanje okoljskih temeljev razvoja bistveno zmanjša ali celo ogrozi učinkovitost pomoči, medtem ko lahko reševanje okoljskih vprašanj poveča njeno vrednost,
A. whereas in many parts of the world environmental degradation is one of the root causes of human deprivation; and whereas a failure to take due account of the environmental bases for development can considerably reduce or even jeopardise the effectiveness of aid, whilst addressing environmental issues can enhance its value,
B. ker vodilna skupina za inovativno financiranje razvoja (Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development) ocenjuje, da znaša finančna vrzel v zvezi s prizadevanji za uresničitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja do leta 2015, cilja za uradno razvojno pomoč v višini 0,7 % BND in cilja v zvezi z okoljsko krizo, od 324 do 336 milijard ameriških dolarjev letno za obdobje 2012–2017,
B. whereas the Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development puts the funding gap as regards efforts to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015, as well as the Official Development Assistance (ODA) target of 0.7% of GNI and environmental crisis targets, at $324-336 billion per year between 2012 and 2017,
C. ker svetovne gospodarske rasti ni spremljala uvedba učinkovitih sredstev za obdavčitev svetovne gospodarske dejavnosti, da bi ta financirala svetovne javne dobrine,
C. whereas the growth of the global economy has not been matched by the introduction of effective means of levying taxes on global economic activity to pay for global public goods,
2. opozarja, da se je svet v obdobju po prvotni opredelitvi razvojnih ciljev tisočletja soočil s pospešeno globalizacijo in finančno krizo brez primere; poudarja pomen nadaljnjih prizadevanj držav članic za doseganje teh ciljev;
Recalls that since the MDGs were first agreed the world has undergone an accelerated process of globalisation and faces an unprecedented financial crisis; stresses the importance of Member States continuing to strive to achieve these goals;
4. poudarja, da je v sklepih poročila projektne skupine za finančne transakcije za razvoj, ki ga je naročila vodilna skupina za inovativno financiranje razvoja, navedeno, da bi bila uvedba mednarodne dajatve za devizne transakcije in davka na vse finančne transakcije tehnično, ekonomsko in pravno izvedljiva;
Stresses that the report of the Taskforce on Financial Transactions for Development commissioned by the Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development concludes that an international levy on currency transactions and a tax on all financial transactions would be technically, economically and legally feasible;
10. poudarja dejstvo, da bi morali z mehanizmi razvojne pomoči tudi spodbujati ustvarjanje bogastva, saj je to še vedno ključno orodje za zmanjševanje revščine; meni, da naj bi iz držav v razvoju na nezakonit način letno odteklo okoli 800 milijard EUR, preprečitev tega pa bi lahko odločilno pripomogla k uresničitvi razvojnih ciljev tisočletja;
Highlights the fact that development aid mechanisms should also seek to promote wealth creation, since this remains a crucial tool in alleviating poverty; recalls that an estimated EUR 800 billion is lost annually from developing countries through illicit capital flows, prevention of which could prove decisive in alleviating poverty and achieving the MDGs;
13. poudarja, da bi moralo biti dodatno financiranje na področju razvojne pomoči usklajeno in da bi moralo ustvarjati učinkovite sinergije z razvojnimi programi držav članic in s prizadevanji širše mednarodne skupnosti, da se zagotovi resnična dodana vrednost na evropski ravni;
Stresses that any additional funding in the area of development policy should be coordinated and create effective synergies with Member States’ development programmes and with the efforts of the wider international community in order to ensure real added value at European level;
16. poziva EU, naj okrepi prizadevanja za ublažitev humanitarnih razmer na vseh območjih sporov, tudi v Palestini, zlasti s podporo Agenciji ZN za pomoč palestinskim beguncem (UNRWA) in pomočjo za pripravo Palestincev na državnost;
Calls on the EU to step up its efforts to alleviate the humanitarian situation in all conflict zones, including in Palestine, in particular through its support for UNRWA and its assistance in preparing the Palestinian people for statehood;
19. predlaga, naj EU ponovno preuči donatorski odnos do držav s srednjimi dohodki, ker so številne države z gospodarstvi v vzponu presegle tradicionalno razvojno sodelovanje; namesto tega meni, naj EU financiranje osredotoči na najbolj potrebne skupine prebivalcev v teh državah ter najrevnejše države, zlasti na najmanj razvite države;
Suggests that the EU reassess its donor relationship with middle-income countries, since many emerging economies have outgrown traditional development cooperation; looks instead to the EU to concentrate funding on the neediest population groups in those countries, and on the poorest countries, especially least-developed countries;
24. poziva, naj se ob pripravi novega večletnega finančnega okvira bistveno zviša znesek posojil EIB, ki ga krije jamstvo EU, da bi povečali učinkovitost in prepoznavnost ukrepov EU zunaj njenih meja za doseganje zunanjepolitičnih ciljev EU, ki so zapisani v Lizbonski pogodbi;
Calls, when the new Multiannual Financial Framework is drawn up, for a substantial increase in the amount of the EIB loans covered by the EU guarantee, in order to boost the effectiveness and visibility of EU action beyond its borders with a view to achieving the EU external policy objectives enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty;
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Corina Creţu, Véronique De Keyser, Nirj Deva, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Eva Joly, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Ivo Vajgl, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Corina Creţu, Véronique De Keyser, Nirj Deva, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Eva Joly, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Theocharous, Ivo Vajgl, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
za Posebni odbor za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013
for the Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013
Poročevalec: Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy
Rapporteur: Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Posebni odbor za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013 kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje predloge:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. opominja, da bi morala prihodnja finančna perspektiva doseči cilje strategije EU 2020, zlasti podnebne in energetske cilje 20/20/20, kar zajema tudi predvideno 30-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij, in uresničiti cilje vodilne pobude „Evropa, gospodarna z viri“;
Recalls that the next financial perspectives should achieve the EU 2020 Strategy objectives, especially the 20/20/20 climate and energy objectives, including a rise to 30% of the target for emission reductions, and meet the ‘Resource Efficient Europe’ flagship initiative goals;
5. meni, da bi moral proračun EU podpirati zagotavljanje javnih dobrin, ki jih trg ne zagotavlja v zadostni meri; okoljske javne dobrine vključujejo ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemov, divjine, podnebne stabilnosti in zmogljivosti za absorpcijo ogljika, oskrbo z vodo in kakovost vode, kakovost zraka in prsti, odpornost na požare in poplave ter tudi ohranjanje dragocenih kulturnih in zgodovinskih krajin; zato meni, da bi morala skupna kmetijska politika nagrajevati kmete in vzdrževalce zemljišč, saj zagotavljajo javne dobrine, na primer privlačno in biotsko raznovrstno pokrajino, strukturni in kohezijski skladi pa bi morali spodbujati ekološki trajnostni razvoj in prehod na družbo z nizko porabo energije in z učinkovito izrabo virov;
Is convinced that the EU budget should support the provision of public goods that are unlikely to be sufficiently delivered by the market; environmental public goods include the preservation of biodiversity and ecosystems, wilderness, climate stability and carbon absorption capacity, water provision and quality, air and soil quality, resilience to fire and floods, as well as the maintenance of valued cultural and historic landscapes; believes, therefore, that the Common Agricultural Policy should reward farmers and land managers for the delivery of public goods, such as an attractive countryside rich in biodiversity, and that the Structural and Cohesion Funds should foster ecological sustainable development and the transition to a low energy-consumption and resource-efficient society;
7. poudarja, da je treba razširiti nacionalne in evropske račune na okoljska vprašanja, da bi omogočili zeleno pretvorbo evropskega gospodarstva, ki bo privedlo do dolgoročne gospodarske rasti in blaginje, kakor je med drugim zapisala Evropska agencija za okolje v svojem poročilu za leto 2010 o stanju evropskega okolja in obetih;
Stresses the need to extend national and European accounts to environmental issues in order to facilitate a green transformation of the European economy which will lead to long-term economic growth and prosperity, as stated, amongst others, by the European Environment Agency in the European Environment State and Outlook Report 2010;
12. je zaskrbljen zaradi pomanjkanja preglednosti pri odhodkih EU in je prepričan, da bo odprt, pregleden informacijski proces za vse državljane okrepil prihodnost skupnosti in da bi moral zato proračun EU zagotoviti popolno, pravočasno in dostopno razrešnico za njegove izdatke;
Is concerned about the lack of transparency in EU spending and is convinced that an open, transparent information process for all citizens will strengthen the future of the community and that the EU budget should therefore provide full, timely and accessible disclosure of its spending;
14. poziva, naj bo v proračunu EU zagotovljenih dovolj sredstev s strukturno osnovo za uresničevanje okoljskih ciljev, in naj se v različnih evropskih skladih namenijo sredstva za okolju prijazna področja, na primer varčevanje z energijo, trajnostno kmetijstvo in javni prevoz, ki prispevajo k močnejšemu in odpornejšemu gospodarstvu EU;
Calls for the EU budget to commit sufficient funding on a structural basis to reach its key environmental targets and to earmark money within the different EU funds for eco-friendly sectors, such as energy saving, renewable energy, sustainable agriculture and public transport, which contribute to a stronger and more resilient EU economy;
17. priznava pozitivni učinek naložb v zdravstveno infrastrukturo na strukturne reforme v zdravstvu in poudarja, da je treba ohraniti in okrepiti strukturne sklade za zdravstveno infrastrukturo ter s tem podpreti prilagajanje zdravstvenih sistemov in inovacije v njih za rast in trajnost;
Recognises the positive impact of investments in health infrastructure on structural reforms in the health sector and underlines the need to maintain and strengthen structural funds dedicated to health infrastructures, thus supporting adaptation and innovation of health systems for growth and sustainability;
21. poudarja, da morajo Evropsko računsko sodišče in pristojni nacionalni organi oceniti zakonitost in tudi učinkovitost evropskih izdatkov ter stopnjo, do katere zadevni ukrepi prispevajo k izpolnjevanju okoljskih ciljev;
Emphasises that the European Court of Auditors and the competent national authorities must assess not only the legality but also the effectiveness of European expenditure, and the degree to which the measures concerned contribute to the achievement of environmental objectives;