natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zaradi tega je potrebno uvesti osnovna jamstva.
It is therefore desirable to establish minimal guarantees.
Člen 25, odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 25, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Na osnovi posredovanih informacij Komisija vsako leto predloži:
On the basis of the information received, the Commission shall each year draw up:
a) poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, v katerem oceni sredstva, uporabljena v vsaki od držav članic, ustreznost uporabljenih metod in dosežene rezultate na področju zbiranja in upravljanja podatkov iz uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002;
(a) a report for the European Parliament and the Council evaluating the means employed by each Member State, the appropriateness of the methods used and the results achieved in the collection and management of the data covered by Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002;
b) poročilo o uporabi podatkov, zbranih v okviru te uredbe, v Skupnosti.
(b) a report on the Community use of the data collected under the present Regulation.
Letna poročila so bolj priporočljiva, ker bi dala več zagona dejavnostim, predvidenim v uredbi, zlasti nadzoru namembnosti in morebitnim kaznim.
Annual reports are all the more necessary, given that they would give greater impetus to the activities covered by the regulation, primarily in terms of checking destinations and of possible sanctions.
Razlogi za predlog
Rationale of the proposal
Sistematično zbiranje zanesljivih osnovnih podatkov v zvezi s ribolovom je temelj pri ocenjevanju ribjega staleža in oblikovanju znanstvenega mnenja ter je bistvenega pomena za izvajanje skupne ribiške politike.
The systematic collection of reliable basic data on fisheries is the cornerstone of evaluating fish stocks and of scientific opinion and plays an important part in implementing the common fisheries policy (CFP).
Namen nove uredbe o zbiranju podatkov je zadovoljiti potrebi po upravljanju ribištva, zasnovanega na floti in območjih, ne pa na staležih rib, in po ekosistemskem pristopu k upravljanju ribištva.
The proposal for a new regulation on data collection is intended as a response to the demands arising from the need to move towards fisheries management which is geared in particular towards fleets and fishing areas rather than fish stocks, and towards an ecosystemic approach to fisheries management.
Predlog je tesno povezan z okoljskimi vidiki ribolovnih dejavnosti.
The proposal relates closely to the environmental aspects of fishing activities.
Ponuja podlago, potrebno za ekosistemski pristop k upravljanju ribištva, prav tako pa upošteva potrebo po poenostavitvi veljavne zakonodaje.
It provides the basic input necessary to apply the ecosystemic approach in fisheries management and also takes into consideration the need to simplify the current legislation.
Poleg tega zelena knjiga "Prihodnji pomorski politiki Unije naproti: evropska vizija za oceane in morja" potrjuje, da je morska strategija EU pomembna za zbiranje in upravljanje zanesljivih podatkov in informacij o morskih dejavnostih kakor tudi o vplivu teh dejavnosti na vire.
Moreover, the Green Paper entitled ‘Towards a future maritime policy for the Union: a European vision for the oceans and the seas’ acknowledges the crucial importance of implementing an EU maritime strategy for collecting and managing reliable data and information on marine activities, as well as their impact on the resource base.
Zelena knjiga obravnava tudi obstoječe probleme pri usklajevanju in zanesljivosti zbranih podatkov in hkrati vrzeli na področju spremljanja znotraj regij EU.
It also addresses existing problems of harmonisation and reliability of the data collected as well as gaps in monitoring within EU regions.
Izboljšan okvir za zbiranje in upravljanje podatkov bo korak v to smer.
An improved framework for the collection and management of data will represent a step in this direction.
Novi sistem zbiranja podatkov bo pokrival vse postopke od zbiranja podatkov v pristaniščih ali na morju do njihovih končnih uporabnikov.
The new data collection system will cover the whole of the process, from the collection of data in ports and at sea to their use by the final users.
Finančna pomoč Skupnosti bi morala biti odvisna od nadzora kakovosti in skladnosti z dogovorjenimi standardi kakovosti.
Financial aid from the Community should be dependent on quality control and respect for generally accepted quality standards.
Za neskladnost in slabo kakovost nacionalnih programov so bile uvedene denarne kazni.
Financial penalties for non-compliance or poor quality of national programmes have been introduced.
Cilji predloga Komisije
Objectives of the Commission proposal
Cilj predloga Komisije je temeljito ponovno pregledati veljavni pravni okvir za zbiranje osnovnih podatkov na področju ribištva in njihovo uporabo za znanstveno svetovanje.
One objective of the Commission proposal is to re-examine in depth the current legal framework governing the collection of basic data on fisheries and their use in drawing up scientific opinions.
Prav tako sta cilja tudi boljši dostop do podatkov in njihova uporaba, vključno z dostopom do dodatnih sklopov podatkov, kot so podatki satelitskega sistema za spremljanje plovil (VMS).
Another is to improve access to data and its use, including access to additional sets of data such as Vessel Monitoring Satellite (VMS) data.
V ta namen so bila opredeljena nova pravila hkrati s pravili o uporabi podatkov, katerih namen je zaščititi interese dajalcev podatkov.
New rules have been defined to this end, as well as rules on the use of data to protect the interests of the data providers.
Končno je pomemben cilj tudi poenostavitev postopkov, saj se bodo nacionalni programi od zdaj naprej določali za obdobje 3 let, države članice pa bi dobile možnost, da po potrebi vključijo spremembe (da bi, na primer, upoštevale povečano mednarodno usklajevanje).
Simplification of the procedures is another important goal, as national programmes will henceforth be established for a 3-year period; however, the possibility would then be given to the Member States to make changes when necessary, to allow increased international coordination, for example.
Večletna obdobja načrtovanja bodo zmanjšala upravno obremenitev za vse zadevne stranke.
Multiannual planning periods will reduce the administrative burden for all parties concerned.
Pripombe poročevalca in predlagani predlogi sprememb
Rapporteur’s observations and suggested amendments
Preden poda pripombe o vsebini predloga Komisije, želi poročevalec izpostaviti pravno vprašanje.
Before commenting on the content of the Commission proposal, the rapporteur would like to address a legal question concerning the present report.
Svet lahko v skladu s postopkom soodločanja sprejme ukrepe za pripravo statističnih podatkov, kadar je to potrebno za izvajanje dejavnosti Skupnosti.
Acting under the codecision procedure, the Council is empowered to adopt measures to compile statistics if this is necessary for the performance of Community activities.
Isti člen določa pravila za pripravo statistike Skupnosti: statistika Skupnosti mora biti pripravljena nepristransko, zanesljivo, objektivno, znanstveno neodvisno, stroškovno učinkovito in mora zagotavljati zaupnost statističnih podatkov.
The same article lays down rules for the production of Community statistics, which must be compiled in conformity with the principles of impartiality, reliability, objectivity, scientific independence, cost-effectiveness and confidentiality of statistical information.
Dokler nova pogodba ne bo sprejeta, se za ribiško politiko ne bo uporabljal postopek soodločanja.
Until there is a new treaty, there will be no codecision on fisheries policy.
Poročevalec tako zdaj čaka odgovor pravne službe Parlamenta, ki mora podati svoje mnenje v zvezi s pravno osnovo predloga KOM(2007)0196 in ugotoviti, zakaj ni bilo možno uporabiti postopka soodločanja.
The rapporteur is currently awaiting a reply from Parliament’s Legal Service, which has been consulted about the legal framework of proposal COM(2007)0196 and asked to examine why it was not possible to apply the same codecision procedure.
To vprašanje je eden glavnih problemov, ki ga poročevalec v svoji vlogi predstavnika Evropskega parlamenta vidi v predlogu Komisije.
This is one of the main problems which the rapporteur, as the European Parliament’s representative, is facing with regard to the Commission project.
b) Druga točka, ki jo želi poročevalec izpostaviti, izhaja iz razprave, ki je že potekala v Svetu in je ponovno zaživela med portugalskim predsedovanjem.
(b) The second item which the rapporteur would like to highlight arises from a debate which has already taken place in the Council and which has been resumed under the Portuguese presidency.
Svet in večina držav članic ocenjuje, da predlog Komisije ni dovolj jasen glede zahtevanih podatkov, njihove namembnosti in morebitnih kazni.
Many doubts remain within the Council, and the majority of Member States consider that the Commission proposal lacks clarity with regard to the information required, the destination of such information, and possible sanctions.
Poročevalec je vseeno prepričan, da Evropska komisija namerava upoštevati mnenje držav članic in njihove pomisleke.
However, the rapporteur is convinced that the European Commission intends to consider the positions and objections of the various Member States.
c) Tretja točka v zvezi z osnutkom, ki jo želi poročevalec poudariti, izhaja iz dejstva, da sedanji predlog vključuje ekosistemski vidik in da je ta vidik bistven pri podatkih, ki se zahtevajo od držav članic.
(c) The third item which the rapporteur would like to highlight stems from the fact that the current proposal includes the ecosystemic aspect, and that this lies at the core of the information required from the Member States.
Zato poročevalec poudarja, da mora biti predlog Komisije kar najbolj konkreten, in podpira kritiko držav članic Komisiji.
For this reason, the rapporteur stresses the need for the Commission to be as specific as possible in the proposal and on one level supports the criticism levelled by the Member States at the Commission.
Predlaga vzpostavitev arbitražnega sveta na ravni Evropske unije, ki bi od primera do primera odločal o širjenju ali neširjenju podatkov in zlasti o tem, komu in kateri ravni združevanja so namenjeni.
He suggests setting up an arbitration council, which would be an agency at European Union level and which could, on a case-by-case basis, decide on whether or not a given item of information should be circulated and, in particular, who should receive it and at what aggregation level.
Temu vprašanju se je treba posvetiti, da bi omogočili boljši nadzor.
This issue needs to be tackled if there is to be improved control.
Iz povedanega sledi, da je treba predlog obravnavati kot pozitiven, v kolikor omogoča izboljšanje ekosistemskega pristopa k upravljanju ribištva.
By way of conclusion, the present proposal should be viewed in a positive light, in so far as it contributes to an improvement in the ecosystemic approach to fisheries management.
Poročevalec meni, da bodo predlagane spremembe omogočile boljšo analizo, upravljanje in uporabo znanstvenega svetovanja.
The rapporteur considers that the changes which have been introduced should facilitate better analysis, management and use of scientific opinions.
Z večino predlogov sprememb se želi doseči bolj jasno in usklajeno besedilo.
The majority of the suggested amendments aim at improving the clarity and consistency of the text.
Poročevalec podpira predlog Komisije, pod pogojem da se upoštevajo predlogi sprememb.
The rapporteur supports the Commission’s proposal, subject to the changes proposed in the amendments tabled.
Še naprej čakamo na mnenje pravne službe naše institucije.
Meanwhile we continue to wait for the opinion of Parliament’s Legal Service.
Podatki v sektorju ribištva in znanstveno svetovanje v zvezi s skupno ribiško politiko
Data in the fisheries sector and scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi večletnega načrta za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a multi-annual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi večletnega načrta za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju
on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing a multi-annual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0169 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0169 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0110/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0110/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0408/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0408/2007 ),
Člen 3 a (novo)
Article 3a (new)
Države članice, vsaj mesec dni preden Komisiji pošljejo seznam plovil in pasti, obravnavanih v členih 12 in 13, po elektronski pošti Komisiji predložijo tudi ribolovni načrt, ki povzema število plovil in pasti, za katere bi želeli zaprositi dovoljenje za ribolov, skupaj s podatki o predvidenem ribolovnem naporu.
At least one month before the list of vessels and traps which is referred to in Articles 12 and 13 is sent to the Commission, the Member States shall submit electronically to the Commission a fisheries plan indicating the number of vessels and traps for which fishing licences are to be requested, accompanied by information concerning the expected fishing effort.
Vsaka država članica se prepriča, da je število plovil in pasti, ki je navedeno v ribolovnem načrtu, v razmerju s kvoto za modroplavutega tuna, s katero razpolaga .
Each Member State shall ensure that the number of vessels and traps included in the fisheries plan is proportionate to the bluefin-tuna quota allocated to it.
Komisija namerava zahtevati predstavitev ribolovnih načrtov v okviru ribiških sporazumov, tudi ko gre za populacije, katerih biološko stanje je normalno.
The Commission is to ask for fisheries plans to be submitted under the fisheries agreements – even in the case of fish stocks which are in good shape.
Vsaka država članica lahko dodeli kvoto za modroplavutega tuna ribiškim plovilom, ki plovejo pod njeno zastavo, in pastem, pooblaščenim za aktivni ribolov modroplavutega tuna.
Each Member State may allocate its bluefin tuna quota to fishing vessels flying its flag and traps registered by it which are authorised to fish actively for bluefin tuna.
Vsaka država članica lahko dodeli kvoto za modroplavutega tuna ribiškim plovilom, ki plovejo pod njeno zastavo, in pastem, pooblaščenim za aktivni ribolov modroplavutega tuna in navedenim v ribolovnem načrtu, ki ga predvideva člen 3a .
Each Member State may allocate its bluefin tuna quota to fishing vessels flying its flag and traps registered by it which are authorised to fish actively for bluefin tuna and which are included in the fisheries plan referred to in Article 3a .
Predlog spremembe, povezan s členom 3 a (novo).
Consistency with the amendment proposing a new Article 3a.
Kakor navaja poročevalec, se je število kletk za vzrejo tunov pomnožilo in ni vedno skladno s celoletnim dovoljenim ulovom za to vrsto.
As the rapporteur points out, the number of bluefin-tuna fattening farms has outstripped the TACs for that species.
Zato mora vsaka država članica oblikovati razmerje med zmogljivostjo svojih kletk za vzrejo in kvotami, ki jih ima na voljo, sicer ne bo izpolnjen cilj iz načrta za obnovo, da se zmanjša pritisk na staleže.
Each Member State must establish a balance between its quotas and the capacity of its fattening farms, failing which there will be no reduction in the pressure being exerted on the fish stocks – which is, after all, the purpose of the recovery plan.
Prepove se ribolov modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju s plovili za pelagični ribolov s parangali, daljšimi od 24 m, v obdobju od 1. junija do 31. decembra.
Bluefin tuna fishing by large-scale pelagic longline vessels over 24 m shall be prohibited in the East Atlantic and Mediterranean during the period from 1 June to 31 December.
Omogočanje izjem za najmanjšo velikost je v nasprotju z navodili znanstvenih izvedencev in z mnenjem večine držav članic.
The derogations relating to fishing areas conflict with the views held by all scientific experts and with the opinion expressed by the majority of the Member States.
Izjeme niso upravičene z biološkega vidika, saj gre za isti stalež v Sredozemlju in v Atlantiku.
They are not justified from the biological point of view, since the Mediterranean and the Atlantic are populated by a single tuna stock.
Obenem bi ti ukrepi močno izkrivili konkurenčni mehanizem ter pritegnili k ribolovu na omenjenih območjih tudi tista plovila, ki običajno v njih ne lovijo.
Furthermore, they will severely distort competition and will lead to more intensive fishing in the areas concerned, including by vessels which do not traditionally operate there.
Treba je predvideti finančna nadomestila za ribiče za obdobje prepovedi ribolova.
Financial compensation must be provided for fishermen during closed seasons.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 in brez poseganja v člen 10 se najmanjša velikost za modroplavutega tuna (Thunnus thynnus) s težo 8 kg uporablja za naslednje modroplavute tune:
By derogation from paragraph 1 and without prejudice to Article 10, a minimum size for bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) of 8 kg shall apply for the following bluefin tunas:
a) modroplavuti tun, ulovljen v vzhodnem Atlantiku s plovili za prevoz vabe, plovili, ki lovijo s panulo, in plovili s pelagičnimi vlečnimi mrežami;
(a) bluefin tuna caught in the Eastern Atlantic by bait boats, trolling boats and pelagic trawlers;
b) modroplavuti tun, ulovljen v Jadranskem morju zaradi gojenja.
(b) bluefin tuna caught in the Adriatic Sea for farming purposes.
Omogočanje izjem za najmanjšo velikost je v nasprotju z navodili znanstvenih izvedencev in z mnenjem večine držav članic.
The derogations relating to minimum size conflict with the views held by all scientific experts and with the opinion expressed by the majority of the Member States.
Treba pa je tudi poudariti, da že obstaja izjema za Biskajski zaliv (6,4 kilograma namesto 10);
It should be pointed out that a derogation for the Bay of Biscay (6.4 kilograms instead of 10) is already in operation.
Člen 12, odstavek 1, alinea 1 a (novo)
Article 12, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Število plovil na seznamu je v skladu s pogoji in izračuni za ribolovni napor, kot je predvideno v ribolovnem načrtu iz člena 3 a.
The number of vessels on the list shall reflect the terms and conditions and the calculation of the fishing effort referred to in the fisheries plan provided for in Article 3a.
Člen 13, odstavek 1, alinea 1 a (novo)
Article 13, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Število pasti na seznamu je v skladu s pogoji in izračuni za ribolovni napor, kot je predvideno v ribolovnem načrtu iz člena 3 a.
The number of traps on the list shall reflect the terms and conditions and the calculation of the fishing effort referred to in the fisheries plan provided for in Article 3a.
Zaradi nezmožnosti nekaterih držav članic, da spoštujejo svoje obveznosti glede oblikovanja poročila v letu 2007, in prekoračitev, ki so sledile pri določenih državnih dodelitvah sredstev, bi bilo treba prenehati nacionalni ribolov držav članic, ki niso posredovale nobenih podatkov v zvezi z ulovom.
Given the failure of Member States to respect the reporting requirements in 2007 and the subsequent overruns of certain national allocations, the national fishery should be closed if no catch data are provided by the Member State.
Člen 21, odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 21, paragraph 2 a (new)
Cilj je ohraniti trajnostni način ulova tuna, ki je zelo izbiren.
The purpose of this is to preserve a sustainable and highly selective method of catching tuna.
Člen 24, odstavek 4 a (novo)
Article 24, paragraph 4 a (new)
Uskladitev kazenskih ukrepov mora omogočiti, da se izogne razlikam pri izvajanju te uredbe med različnimi državami članicami.
Penalties must be harmonised in order to prevent discrepancies in the way in which the Member States implement this regulation.
Konec novembra preteklega leta je Mednarodna komisija za ohranitev tunov v Atlantiku (ICCAT) v obliki priporočil oblikovala načrt kot odgovor na zaskrbljenosti znanstvenih krogov zaradi ogroženosti staleža zaradi čezmernega ulova.
At the end of November 2006 the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) launched – in the form of recommendations – the plan under consideration here in response to scientists' concerns regarding the critical condition of the stock on account of overfishing.
Načrt predvideva naslednje: postopno zmanjšanje količine ulova (do 20 % v letu 2010 v primerjavi z letom 2006), povečanje najmanjše velikosti od 10 na 30 kilogramov, z izjemami (8 kilogramov) za ribolov v Biskajskem zalivu ter za ulov v Jadranskem morju, ki je namenjen za vzrejo v kletkah.
In brief the plan provides for a steady reduction in the catch quota (by 20% between 2006 and 2010), an increase in minimum size from 10 to 30 kilograms, with derogations (8 kilograms) for fishing in the Bay of Biscay and for catches in the Adriatic intended for fish farms.
Poročevalka na splošno podpira predlog uredbe, vendar ugotavlja, da nekatera vprašanja ostajajo odprta.
On the whole the proposal for a regulation meets with the rapporteur's approval, although he notes that certain matters have not been fully dealt with.
Zlasti gre za načrt za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna, ki je bil predmet različnih kritik ter je pokazal, da imajo znanstveni izvedenci in ribiči različno mnenje o zaščiti staleža.
The bluefin-tuna recovery plan has been criticised in a variety of ways, which illustrates the fact that scientific experts and fishermen hold differing views regarding the need for stocks to be protected.
Poročevalka izraža zadovoljstvo zaradi povečanja najmanjše velikosti na 30 kilogramov, vendar le če bodo vse flote enakovredno obravnavane.
The rapporteur welcomes the fact that the minimum size is to be increased to 30 kilograms, provided that all fleets are required to observe the same rules.
Če je vzrok za različno obravnavo v posebnosti tradicionalnih ribolovov, potem je treba te posebnosti obravnavati pod enakimi pogoji.
Differing treatment may, however, be justified by the inherent characteristics of traditional fishing.
Če je preživetje staleža dejansko tako kritično, potem so izjeme, tako kar zadeva velikost kot obdobja prepovedi ribolova (v manjši meri), nedopustne.
If the situation regarding the survival of fish stocks is really so critical, the derogations regarding both minimum size and – to a lesser extent – closed seasons are unacceptable.
Dejansko izjeme niso upravičene z biološkega vidika, saj gre za isti stalež v Sredozemlju in v Atlantiku, poleg tega pa se tako zmanjša tudi učinkovitost nadzora.
Derogations would not be justified from a biological point of view on account of the fact that the Mediterranean and the Atlantic are populated by a single tuna stock.
Nezakoniti ribolov je ena od največjih težav pri zaščiti staleža modroplavutega tuna.
Illegal fishing is regarded as one of the major scourges undermining the protection of bluefin-tuna stocks.
Koliko bo ta nadzor učinkovit v boju proti nezakonitemu ribolovu?
What effect the controls will have on illegal fishing remains to be seen.
Nadzor je lahko učinkovitejši, če sodelujejo različni strokovnjaki ter državne in lokalne oblasti.
The controls would in all likelihood be more effective if the various categories of people working in the fishing industry were to cooperate more effectively with state and local authorities.
Zato je potrebno sodelovanje držav članic v postopku odločanja Evropske unije, tako da se jim dodeli pravico do pobude.
To this end the Member States must be involved in the EU's decision-making process through the introduction of the principle of Member-State initiative.
Zmanjšanje števila plovil
Fleet reduction