natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
7. poudarja, da morajo biti inovacije osredotočene na posameznika, in pozdravlja prizadevanja za okrepitev dialoga med univerzami in podjetji, ki znatno prispeva k spodbujanju raziskav in inovacij, pa tudi k učinkovitejši uporabi znanja, ki ga zasebni sektor pridobi z univerz, ter pri bogatenju akademskega izobraževalnega gradiva v skladu sodobnimi družbenimi in poslovnimi zahtevami;
Stresses that innovation must be centred on the individual and welcomes efforts to step up the dialogue between universities and the business world, which is substantially helping to promote research and innovation, as well as the more effective use of knowledge imparted by the private sector within the universities, and to enrich academic course material in line with present-day social and business requirements;
9. pozdravlja ukrepe na področju inovacij kot dopolnilo nacionalnim industrijskim strategijam na ravni Skupnosti in z medsektorskega vidika ter poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej uporablja ta pristop;
Welcomes these innovation policy measures as complementing the national industrial strategies at Community level and in cross-sectoral terms, and urges the Commission to pursue that approach further;
11. poudarja, da so investicije na področju visokohitrostnih internetnih omrežij in širitve širokopasovnih povezav osnovni pogoj za večjo in učinkovitejšo širitev inovativnih dosežkov ter za zmanjševanje razlik med regijami EU na področju inovacij;
Stresses that investment in high-speed online networks and greater broadband penetration are basic conditions for increased and more effective dissemination of innovatory achievements and hence a narrowing of the innovation gap between EU regions;
Večanje in usmerjanje sredstev EU za inovacije
Increasing and focusing EU financial support for innovation
22. meni, da morajo biti izdatki EU za raziskave in inovacije osredinjeni na cilje, na primer zagotavljanje spodbud za komercialno uporabo raziskovalnih dognanj, pa tudi na izčrpnejše informiranje o virih in možnostih financiranja; poudarja, da je pomembno ohraniti preglednost in enake možnosti za dostop do sredstev za predloge raziskav na podlagi javnih razpisov; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sredstva iz strukturnih skladov uporabijo za spodbuditev inovacij v večjem obsegu; poudarja, da je treba razviti sheme za financiranje socialnih inovacij z večjo osredinjenostjo na družbeni donos;
Takes the view that EU expenditure on research and innovation must focus on objectives such as providing incentives for the commercial application of research findings, as well as more comprehensive information concerning funding sources and possibilities; stresses the importance of keeping transparency and equal opportunities in accessing funds on the basis of open calls for research proposals; calls on the Commission and the Member States to use structural funds to incentivise large scale innovation; highlights the need to develop social innovation financing schemes with an increased focus on social returns;
25. poudarja, da je treba določiti smernice, ki bodo zagotovile konkurenčno dodeljevanje in hitro uporabo sredstev, in uvesti sistem nagrajevanja projektov z znatnimi in takojšnjimi ekonomskimi učinki;
Stresses the need for guidelines to guarantee the competitive allocation and prompt utilisation of funding and the introduction of an award scheme for projects which have a major immediate economic impact;
Izboljšanje upravne strukture programov
Improving programme governance structures
Komisijo tudi poziva, naj zagotovi, da bo regulativni okvir EU podpiral inovacije, ne pa oviral spremembe, in da bodo ustrezne notranje službe in generalni direktorati sodelovali ob pomoči struktur, kakršna je predvidena delovna skupina, tako da bodo vprašanja inovacij celovito in izčrpno preučili; vztraja, da bi to moralo privesti do manj razdrobljenih instrumentov EU na področju inovacijske politike;
Calls, likewise, on the Commission to ensure that the EU regulatory framework supports innovation rather tha n constitu ting a barrier to change and that there is effective cooperation among the relevant internal services and directorates-general with the help of a structure such as the envisaged task force in order to give coherent and comprehensive consideration to innovation issues; insists that this should lead to less fragmented EU instruments in the field of innovation policy;
34. poudarja, da bi bile pomembne izdatnejše informacije o ustreznih možnostih in virih financiranja ter zanesljivi podatki glede alternativnih oblik financiranja, na primer o licenčnih sporazumih, da bi podjetja spodbudili k večjemu vlaganju;
Stresses the importance of more comprehensive information concerning suitable funding channels and sources and of reliable data concerning alternative forms of funding, such as licensing agreements, so as to make undertakings more willing to invest;
Spodbujanje zasebnega financiranja
Encouraging private-sector financing
37. poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi praktične ukrepe za izboljšanje dostopa do financiranja za inovativna podjetja v akcijskem načrtu za inovacije; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je treba nujno upoštevati različne potrebe glede financiranja in inovacijsko intenzivnost podjetij v različnih fazah ustanovitve in rasti;
Calls on the Commission to put forward, in the action plan for innovation, practical measures to improve innovative companies’ access to financing; emphasises in that regard the need to take into account the differing funding requirements and innovation intensity of companies during their different start-up and growth phases;
40. poudarja, da je treba v javnih razpisih, objavljenih v okviru pobud za raziskave in inovacije, zagotoviti minimalna sredstva za mala in srednja podjetja, ki ustrezajo obveznostim iz sedmega okvirnega programa (15 % sredstev programa sodelovanja);
Stresses the importance of providing for a minimum allocation of funds for SMEs in the open calls published under the Research and Innovation initiatives, following the same commitment adopted for the FP7 (15% of the resources in the Cooperation programme);
Izboljšanje okvirnih pogojev za podjetja, zlasti mala in srednja
Improving the framework conditions for businesses, especially SMEs
43. v zvezi s tem pozdravlja, da bo v letu 2010 pregledan okvir Skupnosti za državno pomoč za raziskave, razvoj in inovacije;
Welcomes, in that context, the fact that the Community framework for State aid for research and development and innovation is to be reviewed in 2010;
49. ugotavlja, da postaja uporaba patenta kot zavarovanja za bančno financiranje čedalje pomembnejša, vendar banke zaradi pomanjkljivega tehnološkega znanja ne morejo oceniti vrednosti patentov; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, ali naj EU nudi podporo pri razvoju standardov vrednotenja;
Notes the increasing use of patents as securities for bank financing, but that banks often lack the technical knowledge to be able to correctly assess the value of patents when lending; calls therefore on the Commission to investigate whether the EU should provide support for the development of valuation standards;
Sporočilo „Pregled inovacijske politike Skupnosti v spreminjajočem se svetu“ z dne 2. septembra 2009 opisuje napredek na področju politike inovacij v EU, ki je bil dosežen od leta 2005, in nakazuje prihodnja področja delovanja, ki bodo vključena in opredeljena v akcijskem načrtu za inovacije.
The communication of 2 September 2009 on ‘Reviewing Community innovation policy in a changing world’ outlines the progress made on EU innovation policy since 2005 and identifies areas – to be addressed more specifically in the ‘Action plan for innovation’ – where action will be needed in the future.
Poročevalec pozdravlja predlog o evropskem inovacijskem načrtu, za katerega upa, da bo ambiciozen, podjetniško usmerjen in obetaven.
The rapporteur awaits with anticipation the proposal for what he hopes will be an ambitious, business-orientated, forward-looking European innovation plan.
To poročilo naj bi prispevalo k oblikovanju mnenja in Komisiji pomagalo določiti okvirne točke akcijskega načrta.
This report is intended as a contribution to the opinion-forming process and it identifies key points for the Commission to address in the action plan.
Poročilo je bilo pripravljeno v času, ko mora EU sprejeti novo strategijo, da bi pospešili prehod Evrope v konkurenčno, na znanju temelječe, inovativno, socialno in trajnostno gospodarstvo.
It has been produced at a time when the EU needs to come up with a new strategy for pursuing Europe's transformation into a globally competitive, knowledge-based, innovative, socially aware and sustainable location for business.
Tako prihodnja strategija EU 2020 kot tudi akcijski načrt za inovacije morata EU zagotoviti instrumente, s katerimi bo lahko obvladala prihodnje družbene izzive.
The future EU 2020 strategy together with the action plan for innovation must give the Union the tools it needs to overcome the major social challenges that lie ahead.
Preoblikovanje evropskega gospodarstva v trajnostno mora pripomoči k večji konkurenčnosti evropskih podjetij in mora zaradi ekonomskih in okoljskih izzivov, s katerimi se srečujemo, nacionalnim gospodarstvom omogočiti več priložnosti.
Transforming Europe’s economy into a sustainable one must have the effect of making European companies more competitive and must enable new opportunities to emerge for our national economies as a result of the economic and environmental challenges we face.
Široko zasnovan inovacijski pristop
A broad approach to innovation
Akcijski načrt za inovacije bi moral zajeti vse oblike inovacij v javnem in zasebnem sektorju, pa tudi netehnološke inovacije.
The action plan for innovation should cover all forms of innovation in both the public and private sectors, including non-technological innovations.
Da bi preprečili nastanek novih socialnih razlik, bi morali dodano vrednost inovacij v prihodnje meriti ne samo z vidika okoljskega in ekonomskega prispevka, temveč upoštevati tudi njihovo družbeno dodano vrednost.
In order to counter the emergence of new forms of inequality in society, innovations should in future be measured not only in terms of their environmental and economic benefits but also by the yardstick of social added value.
Glavno vodilo prihodnje politike na področju inovacij bi morala biti ne samo tehnološka, temveč tudi skupna družbena dodana vrednost inovacij.
A key theme in the new innovation policy should be the social added value of innovation generally, not only in technological but also in social terms.
Poročevalec podpira stališče Evropske komisije v njenem sporočilu o ključnih spodbujevalnih tehnologijah, da so te osrednjega pomena za dosego opisanih ciljev.
The rapporteur supports the view expressed by the Commission in its communication that key enabling technologies will be crucial to achieving the above-mentioned aims.
Globalni konkurenčni boj je povzročil, da se v tretje države ne seli samo vedno več proizvodnih zmogljivosti, temveč tudi z njimi povezane raziskovalne in razvojne zmogljivosti.
As a result of global competition to attract investment, not only certain production plants but also the research and development capacities associated with them are increasingly being relocated to third countries.
Poleg konkurenčnosti kot političnega cilja se mora EU spoprijeti tudi z drugimi velikimi družbenimi izzivi, kot so podnebne ali demografske spremembe.
Alongside the policy aim of competitiveness, the EU also needs to tackle other major challenges that face our societies today, including climate change and demographic change.
Ključne spodbujevalne tehnologije, kot so mikro- in nanoelektronika, fotonika, bio- in nanotehnologija ter novi materiali odpirajo številne nove možnosti za inovacije tako pri postopkih kot pri proizvodih.
In that regard, key enabling technologies, such as microelectronics and nanoelectronics, photonics, biotechnology and nanotechnology, and new materials offer considerable potential for both process and product innovation.
Ključne spodbujevalne tehnologije zaradi svoje hitre rasti močno vplivajo na konkurenčnost.
Because key enabling technologies are a strong growth sector, they have a major influence on competitiveness.
Zlasti področja informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije, kemije, oskrbe z energijo (na primer zajemanje in skladiščenje ogljika, tehnologije za energetsko učinkovitost), avtomobilske industrije (ravno na področju vozil na električni pogon), medicinske tehnologije, industrije polprevodnikov ter letalstva in aeronavtike odpirajo možnosti za bistvene izboljšave kakovosti in produktivnosti.
There is particular scope for significantly increasing quality and productivity in fields such as ICT, chemicals, energy supply – e.g. carbon capture and storage (CCS) and energy efficiency technologies – as well as automotive construction (and specifically electric vehicles), medical technology, the semiconductor industry and aviation.
Glede na kompleksnost gospodarskih dejavnosti in razvoja v prihodnosti ta seznam seveda ni izčrpen.
Given the complexity of economic activity and its future development, this list clearly cannot be exhaustive.
Mala in srednja podjetja so pri tem pomembni partnerji v vrednostnih verigah, tudi kot samostojni ponudniki inovativnih izdelkov, na primer na področju okoljske tehnologije in obnovljivih virov energije.
Small and medium-sized enterprises are important partners in the value chains here, and also as independent providers of innovative products, for example in the fields of environmental technology and renewable energy.
Zaradi svoje bližine trgu in prilagodljivosti prispevajo ta podjetja še posebej veliko inovativnih izdelkov in storitev ter so gonilo tehničnega napredka.
SMEs, by virtue of their proximity to markets and their flexibility, produce a particularly large number of innovative products and services and help to drive technology forwards.
Zato se jih v tem kontekstu ne sme zanemarjati, temveč je treba ohraniti ustrezen, njihovim potrebam prilagojen, regulativni okvir.
For that reason, SMEs must not be neglected in the promotion of innovation and must have appropriate regulatory frameworks tailored to their needs.
Po mnenju poročevalca so pri tem izredno pomembni tudi inovacijski grozdi.
In that regard, the rapporteur also considers that the importance of innovation clusters cannot be overstated.
Grozde svetovnega pomena, ki v EU že deloma obstajajo, je treba ob sodelovanju na vseh ravneh dejavno razvijati naprej, da bi lahko ohranili in morebiti izboljšali svojo vodilno vlogo.
World-class clusters – and some such already exist in the EU – need to be further developed, by means of cooperation at all levels, so that they can sustain and, wherever possible, build on their leading role.
V tesnem sodelovanju z velikimi in manjšimi podjetji ter univerzami in drugimi raziskovalnimi ustanovami bi lahko grozdi pomagali ustvariti nove sektorje z večjo družbeno-gospodarsko in industrijsko pomembnostjo, ki bi povečali privlačnost evropskih regij.
Within cohesive partnerships involving large and smaller companies as well as universities and other research institutions, clusters can help to generate new sectors of major socio-economic and industrial relevance, thus making Europe’s regions more attractive.
Zato poročevalec meni, da mora prenovljena strategija EU na področju inovacij vključevati zamisli o spodbujanju obstoječih in novih grozdov.
The rapporteur therefore considers that the revised EU innovation strategy needs to include ideas for promoting existing and new clusters.
Izboljšati bi bilo treba zlasti okvirne pogoje za čezmejno sodelovanje grozdov, na primer s širjenjem najboljših praks.
In particular, the framework conditions for cross-border inter-cluster cooperation – through dissemination of best practices, for example – should be enhanced.
Povečanje in usmerjanje sredstev EU za inovacije
Increasing and focusing EU financial support for innovation
Po izjavah Evropske komisije se za ukrepe na področju inovacij neposredno namenja manj kot odstotek proračuna EU.
According to the Commission, less than 1% of the EU budget is currently spent directly on innovation-related measures.
Glede na prihodnje družbene izzive, s katerimi se bo treba spoprijeti, to ne zadostuje.
Given the social challenges that lie ahead, this is insufficient.
Zato poročevalec zahteva povečanje proračuna EU za inovacije.
The rapporteur therefore calls for an increase in the EU budget for innovation.
Povečanje naj bi se upoštevalo pri prihodnjem načrtovanju za finančno perspektivo 2014–2020, ki se bo začelo konec leta.
This should be reflected in the planning process in connection with the 2014-2020 Financial Perspective, which is to begin at the end of 2010.
Povečano zagotavljanje finančnih sredstev tako na ravni Skupnosti kot tudi na nacionalni ravni ter uvedba instrumentov financiranja, ki ustrezajo naslovnikom, bo odločilno za inovativnost podjetij, tudi zaradi finančne krize in kreditnega krča.
Moreover, and especially against the backdrop of the financial crisis and the credit crunch, it is crucially important for companies' innovative capacity that more funding should be made available at both EU level and national level and that financial instruments should be created which are tailored to the needs of their users.
V vsakem primeru mora biti spodbujanje bolj ciljno usmerjeno.
In any event, financial support must be better targeted.
Razdrobljenost na številne cilje in veliko število posebnih pobud EU se ni obneslo.
Splitting the resources across a range of objectives and a large number of specific EU initiatives has not been shown to be effective.
V tem kontekstu je treba odkriti oziroma okrepiti sinergijo med instrumenti za spodbujanje inovacij.
In this regard, synergies between the various support measures for innovation need to be identified and/or reinforced.
Poročevalec meni, da je za večjo učinkovitost inovacijske politike potrebno boljše usklajevanje, učinkovitejše povezovanje in racionalizirano upravljanje različnih instrumentov spodbujanja.
The rapporteur considers that, in order to make innovation policy more effective, the various support instruments need to be better coordinated and properly linked, with a leaner management structure.
Z vidika uporabnika je tudi veliko število udeleženih akterjev na ravni EU protiproduktivno.
The multiplicity of EU bodies involved is also counterproductive from the standpoint of companies applying for support.
Uporabniki poleg tega potrebujejo jasne informacije, kateri instrumenti za spodbujanje so na voljo, na kateri ravni in za katere ukrepe.
Users of the system need clear information about which support instruments are available, at which levels and for what types of measure.
Tudi na ravni EU je treba zagotoviti boljše usklajevanje.
At EU level, too, closer coordination is required.
Politika na področju inovacij bi morala spadati v pristojnost Evropske komisije – za vso Skupnost.
Innovation policy should be a collective concern of the Commission.
Zato je treba uvesti horizontalno usklajevanje znotraj Evropske komisije, da bi zagotovili tesno sodelovanje med generalnim direktoratom za raziskave ter generalnim direktoratom za podjetništvo in industrijo.
Cross-sectoral coordination within the Commission is therefore needed to ensure that the Research DG and the Enterprise and Industry DG cooperate closely.
To je pomembno zlasti zaradi razdelitve resorjev v Evropski komisiji ter skorajšnjega novega oblikovanja okvirnih programov.
This is particularly important in the context of the redistribution of portfolios in the Commission and the impending update of the framework programmes.
Poleg zagotavljanja javnih sredstev je treba spodbujati tudi zasebne naložbe v inovacije.
Alongside support from the public purse, private-sector investment in innovation needs to be encouraged and promoted.
Ravno tvegani kapital ima v zgodnji fazi in fazi širitve odločilno vlogo pri uspešnosti inovacij, pa ne samo v velikih podjetjih.
Risk capital, especially during start-up and expansion, plays a key role in determining whether companies can innovate successfully – and that applies not just to large companies.
V ustrezni obliki lahko financiranje s tveganim kapitalom, ki dopolnjuje državno pomoč, spodbudi inovacije tudi v manjših podjetjih.
There is no doubt that risk-capital financing, when properly structured, can also be an incentive to innovation for smaller companies, alongside the provision of subsidies.
Uredba o skupinskih izjemah je deloma že uvedla olajšave, vendar bi bilo treba prihodnji pregled okvira pomoči izkoristiti za to, da bi potencial tega instrumenta za spodbujanje inovacij razširili tudi na inovacije, ki niso tehnološke narave.
While the introduction of a general Block Exemption Regulation has already eased conditions in some respects, the impending review of the support framework should be used as an opportunity to exploit the innovation-promoting potential of this tool, inter alia for non-technology-related innovation.
Prav tako je treba preveriti, ali sedanji sistem pomoči ni v nasprotju z novim načelom spodbujanja ključnih spodbujevalnih tehnologij.
There is also a need to check that the current system of subsidies will not impede the new approach of promoting key enabling technologies.
Za vsako ceno je treba preprečiti selitev podjetij zaradi slabih okvirnih pogojev na področju državne pomoči.
The risk of companies moving elsewhere because the legal framework conditions for support are unfavourable must be avoided at all costs.
Poročevalec meni, da mora boljše spodbujanje inovacij sovpadati z zmanjševanjem birokracije.
The rapporteur also considers that enhanced innovation support for SMEs must be accompanied by a reduction in red tape.
Poleg jezikovnih ovir so največje težave pogosto kadrovsko intenzivni postopki oddaje vlog in visoka pogostost napak ter s tem povezano visoko finančno tveganje.
Apart from language difficulties, the main problems are often the staff-intensive nature of application procedures and the high failure rate, with a correspondingly high financial risk.
Zato bi bilo treba poenostaviti postopke za oddajo vlog in po potrebi zmanjšati obveznosti poročanja.
Application procedures therefore need to be simplified and reporting obligations, where applicable, need to be eased.
Zaščita intelektualne lastnine je odločilnega pomena za inovacije, vendar okvirni pogoji za podjetja, zlasti z vidika nastalih stroškov, še niso zadovoljivi.
The protection of intellectual property is a key factor in companies’ capacity to innovate but the framework conditions under which they operate (particularly with regard to the costs involved) are not yet satisfactory.
Patent Skupnosti je pomemben korak v tej smeri in bi ga bilo treba čim prej sprejeti.
The Community patent constitutes an important advance on this front and it ought to be adopted at the earliest possible date.
V zvezi s tem pa je treba ugotoviti, da je treba dodatno iskati še druge, tudi kratkoročno uresničljive instrumente.
However, there is also an evident need to identify other instruments that can be applied in the short term.
Tudi naložbe v izobraževanje in nadaljnje izobraževanje kvalificiranega osebja so glede na pomembnost inovacij odločilnega pomena za konkurenčnost EU in se jih ne sme zmanjševati.
Given the impact of innovation capacity on EU competitiveness, investment in training and further training for skilled staff is also crucially important and it ought not to be cut.
EU mora storiti vse, da ustvari čim bolj privlačno okolje za raziskovalce in strokovnjake, tudi kar zadeva mobilnost, da bi ohranila konkurenčnost v svetovnem merilu.
If the EU is to hold its own in global competition, it must do all it can to make conditions in Europe as attractive as possible to researchers and skilled workers, especially in relation to their mobility.
Trikotnik znanja med raziskavami, inovacijami in izobraževanjem je treba obravnavati kot celoto in se ga ne sme ločevati, saj bi to negativno vplivalo na trajnost inovacij in posledično na trajnost proizvodnje.
The three sides of the knowledge triangle – education, research and innovation – must not be separated, otherwise innovation and, in turn, production will become less sustainable.
Pripravljavec mnenja: Mitro Repo
Rapporteur: Mitro Repo