natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
45. podpira upravljanje na več ravneh in decentraliziran pristop k energetski politiki in energetski učinkovitosti, vključno s konvencijo županov in nadaljnjim razvojem pobude za pametna mesta; poudarja potrebo po verodostojnem financiranju, vključno s pobudami od spodaj navzgor in vključitvi mest in regij; poudarja, da bi uskladitev prihodnje kohezijske politike in uporabe njenih skladov s strategijo EU 2020 zagotovila ključne izvedbene mehanizme za pametno in trajnostno rast v državah članicah in regijah;
Supports a multi-level governance and decentralised approach to energy policy and energy efficiency, including the Covenant of Mayors and the further development of the Smart Cities initiative; underlines the need for credible funding, including for bottom-up initiatives and for the involvement of cities and regions; stresses that bringing future Cohesion Policy and the use of its funds into line with the EU2020 strategy would provide for a key delivery mechanism for smart and sustainable growth in the Member States and regions;
Zagotavljanje varnosti oskrbe z energijo
Ensure security of energy supply
55. meni, da mora EU zagotoviti močno in skladno mednarodno razsežnost svoje energetske politike in vključiti vprašanja energije v svojo zunanjo politiko in aktivnosti; je prepričan, da bi morala visoka predstavnica Unije za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko izraziti močno diplomatsko podporo energetski politiki EU z namenom izboljšanja zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo;
Considers that the EU must ensure that its energy policy has a strong and coherent international dimension and must integrate energy considerations into its external policies and actions; believes that the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy should give strong diplomatic support to the EU's energy policy, with the aim of enhancing energy security;
66. poziva k posebnemu dialogu z državami kaspijske regije in pozdravlja delo v okviru kaspijskega razvojnega sodelovanja; v zvezi s tem podpira dialog o strategiji EU za črnomorsko regijo in poudarja pomen vseh energetskih vprašanj, ki so predmet dialoga med EU in državami te regije;
Calls for a special energy dialogue with the countries of the Caspian region, and welcomes the work on a Caspian Development Corporation; endorses, in this context, the dialogue on the EU Strategy for the Black Sea region and emphasises the importance of all energy issues in the dialogue between the EU and the countries of this region;
72. meni, da imajo nekateri podeželski deli Evrope posebne potrebe pri preskrbi z energijo, in zato poziva države članice, naj te potrebe upoštevajo in odstranijo ovire, vključno z davčnimi ovirami, za lokalno proizvodnjo električne energije, na primer za mikro soproizvodnjo električne energije in toplote;
Believes that some rural parts of Europe have particular needs when it comes to energy supply, and, in that connection, invites the Member States to take these needs into account, for example by removing the barriers, including fiscal barriers, to local energy production, such as by means of micro-cogeneration;
74. poziva k podrobnemu spremljanju izvajanja strateškega energetskega tehnološkega načrta in ugotavljanju ovir za mobilizacijo javnih in zasebnih naložb; pozdravlja nedavni napredek pri zagonu prvih štirih evropskih industrijskih pobud in skupnih raziskovalnih pobud; poziva, naj se druge pobude čim prej začnejo ter poziva Svet naj sprosti potrebna sredstva; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi zainteresiranim stranem pregledne informacije o možnostih financiranja pobud strateškega energetskega tehnološkega načrta;
Calls for the close monitoring and implementation of the SET-Plan and the identification of obstacles to the mobilisation of public and private investments; welcomes recent progress in launching the first four European Industrial Initiatives (EIIs) and the Joint Research Initiatives; calls for the other initiatives to be launched as soon as possible and calls on the Council to release the required funds; asks the Commission to provide stakeholders with transparent information on the financing options for SET-Plan initiatives;
78. poudarja, da bi morala biti Evropa vodilna na področju razvoja spletnih tehnologij in nizkoogljičnih aplikacij informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije, povezanih z energijo; meni, da je treba za boljše spodbujanje inovacij odpraviti odvečno birokracijo za prosilce; poziva Komisijo, naj s preoblikovanjem postopkov okvirnega programa odpravi birokracijo;
Emphasises that Europe should be at the cutting edge in the development of energy-related Internet technologies and low-carbon ICT applications; considers that enhanced support for innovation must always be accompanied by a reduction in the red tape confronting applicants; calls on the Commission to eliminate red tape by re-engineering Framework Programme procedures;
82. podpira nadaljnje sodelovanje med državami članicami in Komisijo glede zagotavljanja potrebnih pobud za razvoj trajnostnega trga biomase, ob upoštevanju pomembnih vprašanj biotske raznovrstnosti in proizvodnje hrane;
Supports further cooperation between the Member States and the Commission on ensuring that the necessary incentives are provided for the development of a sustainable market for biomass, whilst taking the relevant biodiversity and food production issues into account ;
86. meni, da bi bile raziskave na področju nadomestkov za klasične surovine in gradbene materiale, ki bi zahtevali manj energetsko intenzivno proizvodnjo, učinkovit način za zmanjšanje porabe energije;
Considers that an effective way of reducing energy consumption would be to undertake research into substitutes for conventional raw materials and construction materials whose production is less-energy intensive;
87. poudarja pomembnost pametnih števcev kot sredstva za pomoč potrošnikom pri bolj učinkovitem spremljanju svojih največjih stopenj potrošnje ter pri izboljšanju energetske učinkovitosti znotraj njihovih domov; meni, da projekti pametnih števcev in energetski projekti na splošno zahtevajo kampanje osveščanja in izobraževalne programe o energetski učinkovitosti , s katerimi bi državljanom razložili koristi zanje; poudarja, da je obveščanje javnosti o koristih pametnih števcev ključno za uspeh le-teh; poudarja, da je Parlament pozval k cilju, da se do leta 2015 v 50 % domov v Evropi namesti pametne števce, države članice pa morajo do leta 2020 zagotoviti, da ima vsaj 80 % potrošnikov nameščene pametne meritvene sisteme
Underlines the importance of smart meters as a means of helping consumers to monitor more effectively their peak-rate consumption and improve energy efficiency within their homes; believes that smart metering and energy projects in general call for awareness- raising campaigns and educational programmes on energy efficiency in order to explain their benefits to the public; stresses that informing society about the benefits of smart metering is crucial to its success; points out that Parliament has called as a policy goal for 50% of homes in Europe to be fitted with smart meters by 2015 and an obligation on the part of the Member States to guarantee that at least 80% of consumers are equipped with intelligent metering systems by 2020
88. meni, da lahko obveščen potrošnik in državljan z zavestnimi odločitvami vpliva na trg; zato pozdravlja pobude, kot je Evropski forum za jedrsko energijo (ENEF), v okviru katerega razpravlja širok spekter zainteresiranih strani;
Considers that informed customers and members of the public can influence the market by taking conscious decisions; welcomes, therefore, initiatives such as the European Nuclear Energy Forum (ENEF), in which a wide range of stakeholders can discuss matters of shared interest;
97. meni, glede na prihodnji vrh v Cancunu, da bi morala biti EU vodilna v prizadevanjih za celosten, pravno zavezujoč in ambiciozen sporazum, kar bo jasno pokazalo, da EU lahko zastopa enotno stališče ter utrdilo njeno vodilno vlogo; v zvezi s tem spodbuja Komisijo in države članice, naj ponovno preučijo svoj predhodni predlog kot del mednarodnega sporazuma o zastavljenem zmanjšanju emisij CO 2 , da bo doseganje dolgoročnih ciljev lažje in stroškovno bolj učinkovito;
Believes, looking ahead to the Cancun Summit, that the ΕU should be at the forefront of efforts to achieve a comprehensive, legally binding and ambitious agreement, demonstrating that it is able to speak with one voice and confirm its leading role; in this context, encourages the Commission and the Member States to rethink their earlier proposal as part of an international agreement on CO 2 emissions reduction targets, in order to make the achievement of the long-term goals easier and more cost-efficient;
Razmere v Evropski uniji na področju energije so povezane s številnimi izzivi.
The European Union’s energy situation faces many challenges.
Evropski energetski sistem potrebuje obsežna vlaganja, medtem ko se Evropa še vedno sooča s posledicami gospodarske krize.
We have an energy system which needs large investments while Europe still suffers the consequences of an economic crisis.
In tudi naše lastne zakonodaje na področju energije nismo uspeli uresničiti.
And we have failed to implement our own energy legislation.
Lizbonska pogodba je bila prvi korak, s katerim naj bi zagotovili odgovore na ta vprašanja.
The Lisbon Treaty was the first step towards providing an answer to these problems.
Pogodba je Uniji določila jasne cilje: delujoč notranji energetski trg, varnost oskrbe, energetska učinkovitost in spodbujanje energetskih omrežij in obnovljivih virov energije.
It gives the Union a set of clear objectives: a functioning single internal energy market, security of supply, energy efficiency and the promotion of energy networks and renewable sources of energy.
Z njo je Unija pridobila trden pravni okvir in pravno podlago (člen 194) za ukrepe na področju energetske politike.
The Union has also now a strong legal framework and legal basis (article 194) to act on energy policy.
Pogodba pomeni za Unijo začetek novega obdobja.
The Treaty opens a new period for the Union.
Sedaj je čas za prilagoditev naših ciljev in strategij, da bi pogodbo izvedli v celoti.
Now is the time to adjust of our goals and strategies in order to fully implement the treaty.
Zato je poročevalka Evropskega parlamenta prepričana, da je potrebno strateško vodenje in nova energetska strategija za doseganje ciljev iz člena 194 in ciljev v okviru podnebnega svežnja 20-20-20.
This is why the European Parliament Rapporteur believes that strategic guidance and a new Energy Strategy is needed for achieving the article 194 objectives and our 20-20-20 climate package targets.
Delovanje EU se lahko okrepi na več področjih.
EU action can be strengthened on several points.
Eno področje je povezano z boljšo uporabo proračunskih sredstev EU pri energetski in podnebni politiki EU.
One is to better deploy EU budgetary resources on EU energy and climate policies.
Nadalje bi bilo treba vzpostaviti stroškovno učinkovitejše načine za podporo nadaljnjega razvoja in posodobitve vseevropskih energetskih omrežij ter razvoj nizkoogljičnih energetskih sistemov.
Another is to set-up a more cost-effective ways of supporting the further development and modernisation of pan-European energy girds as well as development of low-carbon energy systems.
Ključno je zagotoviti več sinergije med notranjimi in zunanjimi razsežnostmi energetske politike EU.
It is crucial to create more synergy between the internal and external dimensions of EU energy policy.
Poročevalka je prepričana, da obstaja jasna politična volja, da se več ukrepov v zvezi z energetsko politiko sprejme na ravni EU.
The EP Rapporteur believes there is clear political will for more action on these energy policies at the EU level.
Poročevalka se v celoti strinja s Komisijo, da je sedanje izvajanje evropske energetske zakonodaje na splošno neučinkovito, tudi v primerjavi s preteklo zakonodajo, na primer drugim svežnjem o notranjem energetskem trgu, sprejetim 2003.
The EP Rapporteur entirely agrees with the Commission that “ the current state of implementation of European energy legislation is overall poor ”, even in relation to past legislation, such as the 2 nd internal energy market package passed in 2003.
Komisija se je zato povsem upravičeno osredotočila na izvajanje politik, dogovorjenih po letu 2007.
And the Commission is entirely right to put a strong focus on implementing policies agreed since 2007.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, da čeprav so potrebni nadaljnji koraki, takšni ukrepi ne bodo verodostojni ali učinkoviti, če se obstoječa zakonodaja in programi ne izvajajo v celoti.
It is also correct to warn that though “ further steps are needed, such measures will be not be credible or effective, if the existing legislation and programmes are not fully implemented ”.
Prvi cilj je premik v smeri nizkoogljičnega energetskega sistema (predmet prvega strateškega pregleda energetske politike in podnebnega svežnja, ki ga je opravila Komisija).
The first objective is to move towards a low carbon energy system (the subject of the Commission’s First Strategic Energy Review and climate package).
Drugi cilj je zagotoviti varnost oskrbe z energijo za vse (osrednja tema drugega strateškega pregleda energetske politike v letu 2008, ki ga je opravila Komisija) pri prehodu na nizkoogljični energetski sistem in gospodarstvo.
The second objective is to ensure security of energy supply for all (the focus of the Commission’s Second Strategic Energy Review of 2008) as we move to a low carbon energy system and economy.
Tretji cilj je zagotoviti, da prva dva cilja prispevata tudi k večji konkurenčnosti EU in zagotovita energijo po sprejemljivih cenah vsem potrošnikom.
And the third objective to ensure that the first two goals also strengthen the EU's competitiveness and deliver energy to all consumers at affordable prices.
Prvi cilj je lahko, in tudi je, določen s cilji zmanjšanja emisij, s podcilji za delež obnovljivih virov energije in biogoriv v mešanici energetskih virov.
The first goal can, and has been, set in terms of emissions reduction targets, with sub-targets for the share of renewable energy and bio-fuel in the energy supply mix.
Enaka natančnost glede drugih komponent mešanice energetskih virov (nafta, premog, plin, jedrska energija) pa je težavna in ni zaželena.
But it is difficult, and undesirable, to be equally precise about other components of the energy mix (oil, coal, gas, nuclear).
Težavna, ker cene teh virov energije na svetovnih blagovnih trgih nihajo, zaradi česar se njihova uporaba spreminja.
Difficult because as the prices of these energy sources fluctuate on world commodity markets, so their use will vary.
Nezaželena, ker bi moral biti delež fosilnih goriv določen z deležem obnovljivih virov energije, a ne sme in ne more biti določen vnaprej.
Undesirable because the share of fossil fuels should be determined by the share of renewable energy, and should not, and cannot, be fixed in advance.
Smiselno je določiti cilj za delež obnovljivih virov energije (ne glede na vrsto obnovljivega vira energije) v celotni mešanici energetskih virov, da se uravnoteži naraščajočo odvisnost od uvozov fosilnih goriv in doseže zastavljeno zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 .
It is reasonable to set a target for the share of renewables (regardless of the type of renewable energy to be used) in the overall energy mix to counter-balance the rising dependency on imports for fossil fuels and to achieve CO2 emission reduction targets.
Vendar je na splošno treba mešanico energetskih virov prepustiti tržnim akterjem in podjetjem, ki bodo morali sami narediti svoje izračune, temelječe na jasnih politikah, spodbudah in sankcijah, določenih s strani EU.
But, broadly speaking, the energy mix has to be left to market players and companies, who will have to make their own calculations based on clear policies, incentives and penalties laid out by the EU.
Dolgoročno bo prvi cilj, povezan s prehodom na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo, koristil drugemu cilju, povezanim z energetsko varnostjo, tako da bo zmanjšal potrebe Evrope po uvozu nafte in plina.
In the long run, the first goal of achieving a low carbon economy will serve the second goal of energy security by, reducing Europe’s oil and gas import requirements.
Hkrati je treba pozornost nameniti tudi konkurenčnosti EU in cenovni dostopnosti energije za podjetja in zasebne potrošnike v EU.
At the same time, attention must also be focussed on the EU's competitiveness and affordability of energy for EU industry and private consumers.
Proračunska sredstva EU: Velika pomanjkljivost sedanje energetske politike EU je napačno usmerjanje sredstev EU v področje, ki se kljub recesiji še vedno obravnava kot eno najpomembnejših prednostnih nalog evropskih vlad in državljanov.
EU budget funds: A big omission in current EU energy policy is the failure to direct EU funds into an area that still ranks, despite recession, as one of the top priorities for European governments and citizens.
Po navedbah Komisije potrebujejo energetski sistemi EU milijarde eurov naložb v energetska omrežja, proizvodne in prevozne zmogljivosti ter čiste tehnologije.
As the Commission says, “ the EU energy systems need billions of euros of investment in energy networks, production and transport capacities and clean technologies.
Po mnenju Komisije mora biti to osrednja tema prihodnje energetske strategije.
This must be a key theme of the future energy strategy ”.
Poročevalka je prepričana, da si mora Evropa sedaj prizadevati za izvajanje zastavljenih ciljev, vključno s cilji strategije 20-20-20 in členi Lizbonske pogodbe glede energetske varnosti.
The EP Rapporteur believes that Europe must now will the means to implement its stated policy goals including its 20-20-20 targets and the Lisbon treaty articles on energy security.
Nova energetska strategija bi se morala zavzemati za to, da se več proračunskih sredstev EU nameni za energetsko in podnebno politiko, in sicer z začetkom finančnega okvira za obdobje po letu 2013.
The new Energy Strategy should support the spending of greater EU budgetary resources on energy and climate policy, starting with the post-2013 financial perspective.
Običajno je evropski prispevek k energetski politiki bolj regulatoren kot finančen, z izjemo financiranja raziskav in razvoja.
Traditionally, the European contribution to energy policy has been more regulatory than financial (with the exception of R&D funding).
Evropska zakonodaja se je osredotočila na energetska omrežja in energetske proizvode.
European regulation has focused on energy networks and energy products.
Vendar postaja očitno, da se to ne dogaja dovolj hitro, da bi lahko zagotovili nove omrežne povezave, ki so potrebne za obnovljive vire energije na oddaljenih lokacijah, ali pametna omrežja, da bi omogočili več medsebojnih povezav med proizvajalci energije in porabniki ter boljše obvladovanje povpraševanja po energiji.
But it is becoming clear that this is not happening fast enough to deliver the new grid connections needed for renewables in remote places or the smart grids to enable more interaction between generators and customers and better management of energy demand.
Komisija opozarja, da trg sam ne bo zagotovil vseh vlaganj v infrastrukturo, zlasti tam, kjer čezmejna narava nekaterih omrežij otežuje razdelitev stroškov med posameznimi državami članicami.
As the Commission cautions, “ not all infrastructure investment will be delivered by the market alone”, especially where the cross-border nature of some networks complicates allocation of costs between member states. "
Glede na obseg vlaganj, ki so potrebna na področju energije v Evropi, je celo celoten proračun EU majhen.
Compared to Europe’s energy investment needs, however, even the entire EU budget is small.
Vendar bi razumen proračunski prispevek k energetski in podnebni politiki:
But a reasonable budget contribution to energy and climate policy would:
· uskladil proračunske prednostne naloge EU z njenimi političnimi prednostnimi nalogami;
· Align the EU’s budgetary priorities with its policy priorities.
· omogočil novejšim državam članicam v srednji in vzhodni Evropi velik potencial za zmanjšanje emisij in proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov energije;
· Help newer Member States in central and eastern European states with a great potential for emission reduction and renewable energy production.
· interveniral in zagotovil spodbude, kadar tržni mehanizmi ne morejo zagotoviti izpolnjevanja ciljev EU na področju energije.
· Step in and provide incentives, when market mechanisms are not sufficient to pursue the EU's energy objectives.
Ker je proračun EU relativno majhen, poročevalka meni, da ga mora EU uporabiti na način, ki bo sprožil velike učinke finančnega vzvoda.
Since the EU budget is relatively small, the EP Rapporteur believes that the EU must look at ways of using the EU budget in such a way as to trigger high leverage effects.
Eden izmed možnih načinov uporabe evropskega proračuna je jamstvo posojil za spodbuditev zasebnih naložb in naložb v javno-zasebna partnerstva kot v primeru sredstev, namenjenih za energijo, v okviru načrta za oživitev evropskega gospodarstva.
One such way could be to use the European budget to guarantees loans to encourage private and PPP investments as has now been applied with the European Economic Recovery Plan energy funds.
Instrumenti porazdelitve tveganja in posojilne sheme javnih bank bi bili oblika podpore naložbam v energetsko infrastrukturo in bi lahko na inovativen način vedno bolj nadomeščali običajna posojila.
Such risk-sharing facilities and loan schemes by public banks would be a tool for supporting investments in the energy infrastructure and could increasingly replace traditional loans in an innovative way.
Stroškovno učinkovitejša podpora za obnovljive vire energije: Nekatere nacionalne sheme finančne podpore so bistveno obsežnejše kot celotna prizadevanja EU.
Make support of renewables more cost-effective : Some national financial support schemes are considerably larger than the whole EU effort.
Vsekakor je povezava obsežnejših nacionalnih skladov v vseevropsko shemo eden od načinov večje podpore obnovljivim virom energije.
One way, however, to give renewable energy more support would be to link these larger national funds in a pan-European scheme.
Pri oblikovanju nove energetske strategije bi zato bilo treba razmisliti o vrnitvi k prvotnemu predlogu Komisije o vseevropskem sistemu trgovanju z obnovljivimi viri energije ali potrdili o izvoru, kar bi povečalo ekonomijo obsega v Evropi in usmerilo naložbe tja, kjer bi bile najbolj donosne.
To this end, the new Energy Strategy should consider returning to the Commission’s original proposal for a pan-European system of trade in renewable energy or in guarantees of origin.
Energetska učinkovitost: Številnim zainteresiranim se zdi energetska strategija priložnost za krepitev nezavezujočih ciljev načrta 20-20-20: cilj, da se energetska učinkovitost do leta 2020 poveča za 20 %.
Energy Efficiency : Many stakeholders see a new Energy Strategy as an opportunity to strengthen the 20-20-20 plan’s non-binding target: the target to improve energy efficiency by 20% by 2020.
Poročevalka je prepričana, da bo težko doseči kateri koli pravno zavezujoč cilj v zvezi z energetsko učinkovitostjo, zato meni, da bi bilo treba več pozornosti nameniti stroškovno učinkovitim ukrepom, s katerimi bi bolje izrabili še neizkoriščen potencial EU na področju varčevanja z energijo.
The EP Rapporteur, however, believes that it will be difficult to implement any legally-binding energy efficiency target, but instead cost-effective actions to better exploit the EU's still untapped energy savings potential should be emphasised.
Dobro je, da Komisija sili države članice, naj izboljšajo nacionalne akcijske načrte na področju energetske učinkovitosti, ki so jih predložile v letu 2008, saj je te po mnenju Komisije še vedno mogoče precej izboljšati.
It is good that the Commission is pressuring member states to improve on their national energy efficiency action plans, submitted in 2008, which contain “ large room for improvement ”, according to the Commission.