natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za novinarje to pomeni, da je treba o temah, kakor so mobilno gostovanje, skupna kmetijska politika ali nova uredba o označevanju, poročati skladno z njihovim nacionalnim vplivom.
For journalists this means that stories such as roaming, the CAP or new regulation on labelling must be reported in relation to their national impact.
To zahteva pristop od spodaj navzgor, ki je kombinacija splošne perspektive z lokalno perspektivo v državah članicah.
This implies a bottom-up approach combining the big picture with the local picture in Member States.
Poročevalec podpira regionalno poročanje o EU na televizijskih in radijskih mrežah kot dopolnitev poročanju nacionalnih medijev.
Regional EU broadcasting by TV and radio networks is a solution that the rapporteur endorses and a strong complement to national media broadcasting.
Pri tem je lahko dobrodošla podpora financiranje EU pod pogojem, da regionalne radijske in televizijske postaje o EU poročajo neodvisno in kritično.
In this regard EU funding can be supportive on the expectation that regional broadcasters deliver independent and critical EU news coverage.
Poročevalec odobrava pobudo Komisije o vseevropskem oddajanju regionalnih radijskih in televizijskih mrež.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission initiative on regional radio and TV networks’ pan-European broadcasting.
Poročevalec opozarja na možnost javno–zasebnega partnerstva pri sporočanju o zadevah EU.
The rapporteur points to private-public partnerships as a solution when dealing with the issue of communicating EU issues.
To pomeni, da treba tako kot v preteklosti povabiti usposobljene medijske strokovnjake, da prevzamejo komunikacijske naloge za EU.
This means inviting skilled media professionals to deal with communicative tasks for the EU as has been done in the past.
Nova evropska zgodba
The new European story
Delovanje na lokalni ravni ni dovolj.
It is not enough to go local.
Čeprav morajo biti uradniki EU sposobni pripovedovati o konkretnih dogajanjih, s katerimi se lahko državljani poistovetijo, pa potencial evropskega javnega prostora leži tudi v občutku identifikacije, ki presega narodnost.
Even though EU officials must be able to tell concrete stories that citizens can relate to, the potential of a European public sphere also lies in a sense of identification that goes beyond nationality.
Zato je pomembna skupna evropska zgodba, ki presega nacionalne in politične predsodke.
In this regard it is important to tell a common European story that goes beyond national and political biases.
Povedano na kratko, zgodba prvih petdesetih let je temeljila na miru med narodi, gospodarski blaginji in skupnem trgu.
In short, the story over the first 50 years has been based on peace between nations, economic welfare and a common market.
Zdaj je nujno, da se opredelijo osrednji elementi nove evropske zgodbe, saj nove generacije odraščajo z EU kot nekaj običajnega.
Now it is imperative to define the central elements of the new story of Europe as new generations grow up with the EU as the norm.
Pred nami je izziv določanja osrednjih vrednot EU.
The challenge lies in defining the core values of the EU.
Prispevek, vključevanje in poistovetenje evropskih državljanov so pri tem bistvenega pomena in voditelji EU morajo prispevati k tej nalogi.
The contribution, engagement and ownership of European citizens is vital in this regard and EU leaders must contribute to this task.
Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Piotr Borys, Jean-Marie Cavada, Silvia Costa, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Mary Honeyball, Petra Kammerevert, Morten Løkkegaard, Doris Pack, Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli), Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Marco Scurria, Joanna Senyszyn, Timo Soini, Emil Stojanov (Emil Stoyanov), László Tőkés, Helga Trüpel, Gianni Vattimo, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Sabine Verheyen, Milan Zver
Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Piotr Borys, Jean-Marie Cavada, Silvia Costa, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Mary Honeyball, Petra Kammerevert, Morten Løkkegaard, Doris Pack, Chrysoula Paliadeli, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Marco Scurria, Joanna Senyszyn, Timo Soini, Emil Stoyanov, László Tőkés, Helga Trüpel, Gianni Vattimo, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Sabine Verheyen, Milan Zver
Nessa Childers, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Hans-Peter Martin, Iosif Matula, Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Hella Ranner, Rui Tavares
Nessa Childers, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Hans-Peter Martin, Iosif Matula, Georgios Papanikolaou, Hella Ranner, Rui Tavares
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov o sporočilih glede finančnih plačil iz Evropske unije Združenim državam Amerike za namene programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program
(11222/1/2010/REV 1 in COR 1 – C7‑0158/2010 – 2010/0178(NLE))
(11222/1/2010/REV 1 and COR 1 – C7‑0158/2010 – 2010/0178(NLE))
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE..........................................................................................................9
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................10
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE........................................................................................................10
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................11
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov o sporočilih glede finančnih plačil iz Evropske unije Združenim državam Amerike za namene programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the Europe an Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the Europe an Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program
(11222/1/2010/REV 1 in COR 1 – C7‑0158/2010 – 2010/0178(NLE) )
(11222/1/2010/REV 1 and COR 1 – C7‑0158/2010 – 2010/0178 (NLE))
– ob upoštevanju osnutka Sklepa Sveta (11222/1/2010/REV 1 in COR 1),
– having regard to the draft Council decision ( 11222/1/2010/REV 1 and COR 1 ) ,
– ob upoštevanju besedila Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah iz Evropske unije Združenim državam Amerike za namene programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti, ki je priložen navedenemu osnutku Sklepa Sveta,
– having regard to the text of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program, which is attached to the above-mentioned draft Council decision,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. maja 2010 o priporočilu Komisije Svetu, naj odobri začetek pogajanj o sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah ministrstvu za finance Združenih držav za preprečevanje terorizma oziroma njegovega financiranja in boj proti njemu
– having regard to its resolution of 5 May 2010 on the Recommendation from the Commission to the Council to authorise the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the United States of America to make available to the United States Treasury Department financial messaging data to prevent and combat terrorism and terrorist financing
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0143 . ,
Texts adopted , P7_TA(2010)0143 . ,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov z dne 22. junija 2010
– having regard to the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 22 June 2010
– ob upoštevanju mnenja, ki sta ga 25. junija 2010 izrazili delovna skupina za varstvo podatkov iz člena 29 in delovna skupina za policijo in pravosodje,
– having regard to the opinion expressed by the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party and the Working Party on Police and Justice on 25 June 2010,
– ob upoštevanju prošnje za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 218(6)(a) v povezavi s členoma 87(2)(a) in 88(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0158/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 218 (6)(a) in conjunction with Articles 87(2)(a) and 88(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0158/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (A7 0224/2010),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0224/2010 ),
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2001 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2001 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p.
1). , s katero se izvaja člen 286 Pogodbe ES;
1). implementing Article 286 of the EC Treaty;
Svet je 11. maja 2010 Komisijo pooblastil, da v imenu Evropske unije začne pogajanja z Združenimi državami o dajanju na razpolago podatkov o sporočilih glede finančnih plačil Ministrstvu za finance ZDA za preprečevanje terorizma in njegovega financiranja ter boj proti njima (sporazum o finančnih transakcijah EU–ZDA).
On 11 May 2010 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations, on behalf of the European Union, with the United States to make available to the United States Treasury Department financial messaging data to prevent and combat terrorism and terrorism financing (EU-US FMDA Agreement).
Evropski parlament je svoja stališča dosledno izražal v resolucijah, nazadnje v resoluciji 5. maja ( B7–0243/2010 )
The European Parliament has consistently expressed its views in previous resolutions, and most recently on 5 May ( B7-0243/2010 )
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o priporočilu Komisije Svetu, naj odobri začetek pogajanj o sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah ministrstvu za finance Združenih držav za preprečevanje terorizma oziroma njegovega financiranja in boj proti njemu o pogajalskem mandatu, kjer je opozoril na določeno število izboljšav, ki bi morale biti vključene v novi sporazum, zlasti:
European Parliament resolution on the Recommendation from the Commission to the Council to authorise the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the United States of America to make available to the United States Treasury Department financial messaging data to prevent and combat terrorism and terrorist financing on the negotiation mandate, outlining a number of improvements that the new Agreement should include, notably:
· dvotirni pristop je sprejemljiv, če bodo v predvideni sporazum med EU in ZDA vključena stroga varovala, dolgoročno pa bo treba poiskati trajno in zakonito evropsko rešitev za vprašanje zajemanja zahtevanih podatkov na evropskem ozemlju;
· that a twin-track approach can be accepted, if strict safeguards are included in the envisaged EU-US agreement, and, that in the longer term a durable, legally sound European solution to the issue of the extraction of requested data on European soil be envisaged;
· v EU bi bilo treba imenovati javen pravosodni organ z nalogo, da sprejema zahteve Ministrstva za finance ZDA;
· that a judicial public authority should be designated in the EU with the responsibility to receive requests from the United States Treasury Department;
· sporazum mora Komisiji omogočati tudi, da bo v določenih trenutkih med izvajanjem opravila ocene in varnostne preglede;
· that the agreement should also provide for evaluations and safeguard reviews by the Commission at set times during its implementation;
· brez diskriminacije se opredelijo posebne pravice evropskih in ameriških državljanov (npr. dostop, izboljšava, izbris, nadomestilo in pravna sredstva), ne glede na državljanstvo osebe, katere podatki so v obdelavi v skladu s tem sporazumom.
· that the specific rights of European and US citizens (e.g. access, rectification, deletion, compensation and redress) are put in place on a non-discriminatory basis, regardless of the nationality of any person whose data are processed pursuant to it.
Poročevalec bi želel upoštevati še vse druge resolucije, ki jih je o tej temi sprejel Parlament, saj vzpostavljajo skladna merila za oceno sporazuma.
Your rapporteur would like to take into account all previous resolutions adopted by Parliament, as they establish a coherent benchmark for evaluating the Agreement.
V primerjavi s prvim sporazumom, ki ga je Parlament zavrnil, sedanji prinaša izboljšave, dosežene ob doslednih zahtevah Parlamenta, da se morajo za ključna omenjena vprašanja poiskati rešitve.
Compared to the first Agreement, rejected by Parliament, the present Agreement represents an improvement that has been achieved due to Parliament's consistent demands for solutions to the key issues outlined above.
Novi sporazum med drugim vsebuje naslednje izboljšave:
The new Agreement contains inter alia the following improvements:
· Dostopanje do podatkov in njihovo zajemanje na ozemlju ZDA, s strani ameriških agencij, bo spremljal in po potrebi blokiral evropski uradnik (člen 12(1)).
· Access to and extraction of data on US soil by US agencies will be monitored and when required blocked by a European official (Art. 12(1)).
S tem bo onemogočeno podatkovno rudarjenje in gospodarsko vohunjenje.
This procedure will prevent the possibility of data mining and economic espionage.
· Postopek glede pravnih sredstev za evropske državljane je urejen podrobneje (člen 18).
· The procedure regarding judicial redress for European citizens is regulated in greater detail (Art. 18).
· Pravica do popravka, izbrisa ali blokiranja je obsežnejša (člen 16).
· The right to rectification, erasure, or blocking is more comprehensive (Art. 16).
· Določba o preglednosti TFTP ZDA je podrobnejša (člen 14).
· The regulation on transparency of the US TFTP has become more detailed (Art. 14).
· Postopek posredovanja podatkov tretjim državam je predpisan natančneje (člen 7).
· The procedure regarding onward data transfers to third countries is regulated more precisely (Art. 7).
· Obseg boja proti terorizmu je definiran in pojasnjen tako, kot je želel Parlament (člen 2).
· The scope for fighting terrorism is defined and clarified as requested by the Parliament (Art. 2).
· Europol najprej preveri, če prošnja ZDA po finančnih podatkih ustreza zahtevam iz sporazuma, pa tudi če je zasnovana kar se da ozko, šele potem oseba, pooblaščena za pošiljanje podatkov, te lahko posreduje (člen 4).
· Europol shall verify whether the US request for financial data meets the requirements of the Agreement as well as whether it is tailored as narrowly as possible, before the Data Provider is authorized to transfer the data (Art. 4).
· Če se zgodi, da so posredovani finančni podatki, ki niso bili zahtevani (npr. iz tehničnih razlogov), jih mora Ministrstvo za finance ZDA nujno brisati (člen 6).
· If financial data which was not requested is transmitted (e.g. for technical reasons), the U.S. Treasury Department is obliged to delete such data (Art. 6).
· Podatki v zvezi z enotnim območjem plačil v eurih (Single Euro Payment Area – SEPA) se ne posredujejo.
· SEPA (Single Euro Payments Area) data are excluded from the transfers.
Poleg izboljšav v samem sporazumu sta se Svet in Komisija pravno zavezujoče obvezala, da bosta pripravila pravni in tehnični okvir za zajemanje podatkov na ozemlju EU.
In addition to the improvements within the Agreement, Council and Commission have made the legally binding commitment to set up the legal and technical framework allowing for the extraction of data on EU soil.
S tem bo srednjeročno konec tega, da se ameriškim organom prenašajo podatki v večjih količinah.
This commitment will in the mid-term ensure the termination of bulk data transfers to the US authorities.
Oblikovanje evropskega sistema za zajemanje podatkov je zelo pomembna izboljšava, saj stalni prenos podatkov v večjih količinah pomeni odstopanje od načel, na katerih temeljita zakonodaja in praksa EU.
The establishment of a European extraction system represents a very important improvement, as the continued transfer of data in bulk is a departure from the principles underpinning EU legislation and practice.
Predvideni pristop v treh korakih je torej nadvse dobrodošel:
Therefore, the envisaged three steps approach is most welcome:
· Prvi korak: Komisija pripravi predlog za pravni in tehnični okvir po enem letu.
· Step 1: The Commission will present a proposal for the legal and technical framework after one year.
· Drugi korak: po treh letih pripravi poročilo o stanju glede sistema EU za zajemanje podatkov.
· Step 2: Progress report by the Commission on the EU extraction system after three years.
Poročilo ne bo omogočilo le, da bo novoizvoljeni Parlament preveril, ali sta Komisija in Svet izpolnila svoje obveze, pač pa bo lahko tudi zahteval spremembo sporazuma, ki bo odvisna od dosežene stopnje razvoja sistema za zajemanje podatkov (sporazum določa možnost prilagoditve, če se EU odloči za vzpostavitev lastnega sistema zajemanja podatkov (člen 11)).
This report will not only allow the currently elected Parliament to verify whether the commitments by Commission and Council have been fulfilled, but also to demand changes to the Agreement according to the progress of the EU extraction system (the Agreement provides for adjustments if the EU decides to set up its own extraction system (Art. 11)).
· Tretji korak: možno prenehanje sporazuma po petih letih, če evropski sistem zajemanja podatkov ne bo vzpostavljen.
· Step 3: Possible termination of the Agreement after 5 years, if the EU extraction system is not set up.
Komisija je še izjavila, da bo sporazum TFTP ustrezno ocenila potem, ko bo sprejet okvirni sporazum med EU in ZDA o varstvu podatkov.
Furthermore, the Commission declares that once the future EU-US framework agreement on data protection has been concluded, this (TFTP) Agreement will be assessed in the light thereof.
Poročevalec pozdravlja izboljšave, čeprav želi opozoriti, da bi bilo treba nekaj določb opredeliti točneje tedaj, ko bodo izbrani natančni pogoji.
Your rapporteur welcomes the improvements, while wanting to highlight that some provisions should still be clarified when the precise modalities are chosen.
Ker Europol ni pravosodni organ, ki ga je predvidel Parlament, je treba zagotoviti, da bo zanj pri ravnanju z zahtevami ZDA veljal neodvisni nadzor, ki bi ga v času veljavnosti sporazuma lahko izvajal npr. uradnik urada evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov.
As Europol is not the judicial authority envisaged by Parliament, it needs to be ensured that there is independent oversight of Europol in its handling of US requests, which for the duration of the Agreement could be ensured e.g. by the posting of an EDPS official.
Zagotoviti je treba tudi sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta pri izboru neodvisne osebe EU iz člena 12(1).
Also, the involvement of the European Parliament in the selection process of the independent EU person as mentioned in Art. 12(1) must be ensured.
Končni sporazum, v povezavi s pravno zavezujočimi obvezami iz sklepa Sveta, izpolnjuje večino zahtev Parlamenta.
The final Agreement in combination with the legally binding commitments in the Council Decision meets most of Parliament's demands.
Zadovoljivo odgovarja na pomisleke glede varnosti in zasebnosti državljanov EU in prinaša pravno zavezujoče rešitve za splošno znane probleme.
It caters for both security and privacy concerns for EU citizens and ensures legally binding solutions for the commonly known problems.
Sporazum zaznamuje tudi novost v zvezi s pooblastili Parlamenta, saj določa evropski demokratični nadzor nad mednarodnimi sporazumi.
The agreement also marks a new step in Parliament's powers, ensuring European democratic oversight over international agreements.
Glede na vse navedene izboljšave poročevalec predlaga, da se sklenitev sporazuma odobri.
In light of all the mentioned improvements your rapporteur suggests to give consent to the conclusion of the Agreement.
Sporazum med EU in ZDA o TFTP ne zagotavlja jamstev, ki jih je v svojih prejšnjih resolucijah zahteval Evropski parlament.
The EU-US agreement on TFTP does not meet the guarantees requested by the EP in its previous resolutions.
Nekatera med njimi dejansko predstavljajo meje, ki se jih ne sme prestopiti.
Some of them were real red lines.
Celotni sporazum se nanaša na obsežni prenos večjih količin podatkov nič hudega slutečih državljanov EU.
The whole agreement concerns massive transfer of bulk data of unsuspicious EU citizens.
Morebitna vzpostavitev EU-TFTP v roku 3 let ne bo rešila problema.
A hypothetical setting up in a 3 years period of an EU-TFTP would not solve the question.
Praktična rešitev ciljno naravnanega prenosa podatkov za vsak primer posebej na podlagi sodnega pooblastila preprosto ni bila nikoli resno upoštevana.
The practical solution of targeted data transfer on a case by case basis under judicial authorisation was simply never taken seriously into consideration.
Nadzorna vloga Europola ni jasna in bo zahtevala spremembo njegovih pooblastil, Europol pa ni sodni organ.
The role of supervision of Europol is unclear and will imply a modification of its mandate and Europol is not a judicial authority.
Tak sporazum je jasna kršitev zakonodaje EU o varstvu podatkov.
Such an agreement represents a clear violation of EU legislation on data protection.
Zaradi njega bodo ogrožena pogajanja za sporazum o varstvu podatkov med EU in ZDA.
It will undermine the negotiations on an EU-US data protection agreement.
Obdobje hrambe podatkov je odločno predolgo.
Data retention period is far too long.
Obžalujemo tudi pomanjkanje dejanske klavzule o časovni omejitvi veljavnosti.
We also regret the absence of a genuine sunset clause.
Določbe sporazuma o pravicah oseb, na katere se podatki nanašajo, ne izpolnjujejo evropskih meril, zlasti ko gre za pravico do poprave.
The provisions of the agreement on data-subject rights, in particular as regards redress rights do not at all meet the European criteria.
Z ZDA želimo vsekakor sodelovati pri preprečevanju terorizma in njegovega financiranja.
We definitely want to cooperate with the US in the fight against terrorism and terrorism finance.
Tako politiko je mogoče in jo je tudi treba izvajati ob polnem spoštovanju določb pogodb EU o temeljnih pravicah in zasebnosti.
Such policy can and therefore must be pursued in full respect of EU Treaties provisions on fundamental rights and privacy.
ki ga vlaga Gerard Batten
by Gerard Batten
Predlagana zakonodaja je demokratično nelegitimna iz treh razlogov:
This proposed legislation is democratically illegitimate for three main reasons:
1) Vsa zakonodaja, ki je bila sprejeta na podlagi Lizbonske pogodbe, je demokratično nelegitimna, saj ljudem v Evropi ni bil omogočen referendum o sprejetju Pogodbe.
1) All legislation enacted under the Lisbon Treaty is democratically illegitimate because the people of Europe were denied a referendum on the adoption of the Treaty.
3) Zaupni in zasebni finančni podatki so last posameznika in ne Evropske unije ali Parlamenta.
3) This confidential and private financial data belongs to the individual not to the European Union or the Parliament.
Če je tak sporazum potreben, ga je treba sprejeti na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov, sklenjenih med demokratično izvoljenimi vladami, ki za to odgovarjajo svojim volivcem.
If such an Agreement is required then it should be by international agreement entered into by democratic governments elected and answerable to their voters.