natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za skupno besedilo se pripravi prevod v vse jezike (v službah Evropskega parlamenta), ki se v 14 dneh predloži v odobritev obema vejama proračunskega organa.
The joint text will be translated in all languages (by the services of the European Parliament) and will be submitted to the approval of the two arms of the budgetary authority within 14 days.
Proračun se finalizira po sprejetju skupnega besedila v obeh vejah proračunskega organa, tako da se priloge skupnega besedila združijo s proračunskimi vrsticami, ki niso bile spremenjene v spravnem postopku.
The budget will be finalised after the adoption of the joint text by both arms of the budgetary authority by integrating the annexes of the joint text with the budget lines not modified during the conciliation process.
Institucija, ki gosti srečanje (trialog ali spravni postopek), zagotovi tolmačenje s polno jezikovno ureditvijo, ki velja za seje Spravnega odbora, ter ad hoc jezikovno ureditvijo za trialoge.
The institution hosting the meeting (trilogue or conciliation) will provide interpretation facilities with a full linguistic regime applicable to the Conciliation Committee meetings and an ad hoc linguistic regime for the trilogues.
Institucija, ki gosti srečanje, poskrbi za razmnoževanje in distribucijo delovnih dokumentov.
The institution hosting the meeting will ensure reproduction and distribution of room documents.
Službe treh institucij sodelujejo pri zapisovanju rezultatov pogajanj, da se skupni dokumenti finalizirajo.
The services of the three institutions will cooperate for the encoding of the results of the negotiations in order to finalise the joint documents.
Proračunski postopek za leto 2011: okvirni časovni razpored
2011 budgetary procedure: indicative timing
na dan 9. julija 2010
as per 09 July 2010
26. teden (od 28. junija do 2. julija)
Week 26(28 June - 2 July)
- 13. avgust: proračun Sveta
- 13 August: Council Budget
36. teden (od 6. do 10. septembra)
Week 36(6-10 September)
- 7. oziroma 8. september: minister predstavi stališče Sveta na plenarnem zasedanju
- 7 or 8 September: Presentation by the Minister of Council position in Plenary
- 8. september (ob 12.00): ROK, do katerega odbori in poslanci EP vložijo predloge sprememb za plenarno zasedanje (40 podpisov)
- 8 September (12:00 noon): DEADLINE to table amendments to Plenary by Committees and MEPs (40 signatures)
- 8. september (ob 12.00): ROK, do katerega posamezni poslanci EP vložijo predloge sprememb za Odbor za proračun (manj kot 40 podpisov)
- 8 September (12:00 noon): DEADLINE to table amendments to COBU by individual MEPs (with less than 40 signatures)
(od 13. do 17. septembra)
(13-17 September)
- 15. september (ob 12.00): ROK, do katerega politične skupine vložijo predloge sprememb za plenarno zasedanje
- 15 September (12:00 noon) - DEADLINE for tabling amendments to Plenary by Political Groups
40. teden (od 4. do 8. oktobra)
Week 40(4 - 8 October)
- 4., 5., 7. oktober: seja Odbor za proračun: konec glasovanja o predlogih sprememb in resoluciji
- 4, 5, 7 October: BUDG Committee meeting: end of vote on amendments & resolution
- 20. oktober: glasovanje v EP
- 20 October: Vote by EP
- Komisija predstavi pisni predlog spremembe za kmetijske odhodke
- Commission presents Amending Letter on Agricultural expenses
- po glasovanju, morebitna izjava ministra na plenarnem zasedanju, ki "upošteva razlike v stališčih Sveta in EP"
- After the vote, possible declaration by the Minister in plenary "takes note of the differences between Council's and EP's positions"
- 22. oktober: predsednik EP pošlje pismo, s katerim skliče Spravni odbor
- 22 October: EP President sends the letter to convene the Conciliation Committee
43. teden (od 25. do 29. oktobra)
Week 43(25-29 October)
- 25. oktober: Svet posreduje uradno pismo o odobritvi/ ne odobritvi predlogov sprememb EP
- 25 October: Transmission by Council of official letter of accept/not accept EPs amend
- 27. oktober dopoldne: – Odbor za proračun
- 27 October am: - BUDG Committee
– morebiten trialog
- Possible Trilogue
- 27. oktober popoldne : predsednik Evropskega parlamenta (v prostorih EP) uradno skliče Spravni odbor (člen 314(4) PDEU) (točen čas bo potrjen naknadno)
- 27 October pm : Official opening of the Conciliation Committee (Art 314.4 TFUE) by the President of the European Parliament (EP premises) (exact time to be confirmed)
Pripravljalna srečanja (poročevalci)
Preparatory meetings (rapporteurs)
- 4. november: trialog (oblika bo opredeljena naknadno)
- 4 November: Trilogue (format to be defined)
- 9. november: odbor za proračun
- 9 November : BUDG Committee
- 11. november: drugi spravni sestanek (v prostorih Sveta)
- 11 November : Second Conciliation meeting (CSL premises)
Konec spravnega postopka
End of the Conciliation
(od 15. do 19. novembra)
(15-19 November)
- EP: priprava stališča političnih skupin glede skupnega besedila
- EP: preparation of Political Groups position on the Joint Text
- 15. november: trialog (po potrebi)
- 15 November : Trilogue (if needed)
47. teden (od 22. do 26. novembra)
Week 47(22-26 November)
- Parlament in Svet potrdita skupno besedilo
- Approval of Joint text by the Parliament and by the Council
o stališču Parlamenta o predlogu proračuna za leto 2011, kot ga je spremenil Svet – vsi oddelki
on Parliament's position on the 2011 Draft Budget as modified by the Council – All sections
3. da bi ohranili sposobnost EU za ukrepanje, poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj sprejmeta vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi v okviru pregleda večletnega finančnega okvira znatno povečala finančna sredstva, ki so na voljo v razdelku 4;
In order to preserve the EU's ability to act, urges the Council and the Commission to take all necessary steps to substantially increase, in the context of the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework, the financial resources available under heading 4;
5. ponovno potrjuje svojo podporo procesu širitve in odločno nasprotuje zmanjšanju sredstev za poslovanje v zvezi z Instrumentom za predpristopno pomoč, ki ga je predlagal Svet v obdobju, ko je verodostojnost predanosti EU evropski prihodnosti regije bistvenega pomena za izvajanje prihodnjih reform v državah kandidatkah in državah potencialnih kandidatkah;
Reaffirms its support for the enlargement process and strongly disagrees with the decreases in operational appropriations relating to the Instrument for Pre-Accession introduced by the Council, at a time when the credibility of the EU's commitment towards the European future of the region is essential for the implementation of further reforms in the candidate and potential candidate countries;
7. se ne strinja s predlogom Sveta o izbrisu vseh odobritev za plačila v okviru rezerve za nujno pomoč, saj bi bilo to v nasprotju z duhom tega mehanizma, torej hitro zagotovitvijo sredstev v izrednih razmerah;
Disagrees with the Council's proposal to delete all payment appropriations under the Emergency Aid Reserve, as this would be contrary to the spirit of this mechanism, which is to quickly provide funds in emergency situations;
Gabriele Albertini, Sir Robert Atkins, Dominique Baudis, Bastiaan Belder, Frieda Brepoels, Arnaud Danjean, Marietta Gianaku (Marietta Giannakou), Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadzigeorgiu (Takis Hadjigeorgiou), Heidi Hautala, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jelko Kacin, Ioanis Kasulidis (Ioannis Kasoulides), Tunne Kelam, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Sabine Lösing, Barry Madlener, Kiriakos Mavronikolas (Kyriakos Mavronikolas), Alexander Mirsky, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols, Kristiina Ojuland, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Alojz Peterle, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Adrian Severin, Marek Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, Charles Tannock, Geoffrey Van Orden, Graham Watson
Gabriele Albertini, Sir Robert Atkins, Dominique Baudis, Bastiaan Belder, Frieda Brepoels, Arnaud Danjean, Michael Gahler, Marietta Giannakou, Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Heidi Hautala, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jelko Kacin, Ioannis Kasoulides, Tunne Kelam, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Sabine Lösing, Barry Madlener, Kyriakos Mavronikolas, Alexander Mirsky, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols, Kristiina Ojuland, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Alojz Peterle, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Adrian Severin, Marek Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, Charles Tannock, Geoffrey Van Orden, Graham Watson
Emine Bozkurt, Reinhard Bütikofer, Lorenzo Fontana, Roberto Gualtieri, Baronica Sarah Ludford (Baroness Sarah Ludford), Doris Pack, György Schöpflin, Dominique Vlasto
Emine Bozkurt, Reinhard Bütikofer, Lorenzo Fontana, Roberto Gualtieri, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Doris Pack, Judith Sargentini, György Schöpflin, Dominique Vlasto
o stališču Parlamenta o predlogu proračuna za leto 2011, kot ga je spremenil Svet – vsi oddelki
on Parliament's position on the 2011 Draft Budget as modified by the Council - All sections
2. odločno zavrača vse poskuse financiranja programa za države AKP, ki pridelujejo banane, s prerazporeditvijo razvojnih sredstev znotraj razdelka 4, zlasti predlog, da bi v ta namen prerazporedili 13 milijonov EUR iz instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje in 5 milijonov EUR iz finančnega instrumenta za civilno zaščito (19 09 01, 19 10 01 01, 21 02 01, 21 03 01, 21 05 01 01, 21 06 02 in 23 03 06);
Firmly rejects any attempts to finance the programme for ACP banana-producing countries through redeployment of development appropriations within heading 4, in particular the proposal to redeploy for this purpose EUR 13 million from the Development Cooperation Instrument and EUR 5 million from the Civil Protection Financial Instrument (19 09 01, 19 10 01 01, 21 02 01, 21 03 01, 21 05 01 01, 21 06 02 & 23 03 06);
, vendar odločno nasprotuje financiranju tega instrumenta s proračunskimi sredstvi, ki so namenjeni instrumentu za razvojno sodelovanje (19 09 01, 19 10 01 01, 19 09 03, 19 10 04 in 21 06 06);
, but resolutely opposes its being financed with appropriations programmed for use under the Development Cooperation Instrument (19 09 01, 19 10 01 01, 19 09 03, 19 10 04 & 21 06 06);
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Corina Creţu, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, Enrique Guerrero Salom, András Gyürk, Eva Joly, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, David-Maria Sassoli, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Ivo Vajgl, Anna Záborská, Gabriele Zimmer
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Corina Creţu, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, Enrique Guerrero Salom, András Gyürk, Eva Joly, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, David-Maria Sassoli, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Theocharous, Ivo Vajgl, Anna Záborská, Gabriele Zimmer
Róża, grofica Thun und Hohenstein (Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein)
Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein
o stališču Parlamenta o predlogu proračuna za leto 2011, kot ga je spremenil Svet – oddelek III – Komisija
on Parliament's position on the 2011 Draft Budget as modified by the Council - Section III - Commission
3. poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, na kakšen način financira pomoč za trgovino, in zagotovi, da to financiranje ni v škodo razvojnim skladom;
Calls on the Commission to clarify the way it finances Aid for Trade and to ensure that this is not done at the expense of the development funds;
5. je seznanjen s predlaganim povišanjem proračunske vrstice za makrofinančno pomoč (01 03 02) v predlogu proračuna za leto 2011 v primerjavi s proračunom za leto 2010; opozarja, da za uporabo tega instrumenta za tretje države velja redni zakonodajni postopek, in od Komisije zahteva, naj dodatno pojasni predlagano povišanje;
Takes note of the proposed increase in the draft budget for 2011, as compared to the budget for 2010, against the MFA budget line (01 03 02); recalls that the mobilisation of this instrument for each third country falls under the ordinary legislative procedure and requests the Commission to provide further explanation on its proposed increase;
9. ponovno poudarja, da si je zadal cilj spremljati pogajanja STO s parlamentarnim postopkom; zato poudarja, da bo v prihodnje potrebno stalno financirati to osrednjo dejavnost; v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da bo leta 2011 organizirano vsaj eno letno zasedanje parlamentarne konference o STO, ali sočasno z ministrsko konferenco STO, če bo organizirana, ali pa v Bruslju ali Ženevi, ter da bosta potekali dve zasedanji usmerjevalnega odbora v Ženevi;
Reiterates its declared aim to accompany WTO negotiations with a parliamentary process; stresses that there will be a continual future need to finance this crucial activity; notes that in 2011 there will be at least an Annual Session of the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO, either in parallel with the WTO Ministerial Conference - if it is organised - or otherwise in Brussels or Geneva and that there will be two sessions of its Steering Committee in Geneva;
11. poudarja, da bo Parlament, če bo leta 2011 organizirana ministrska konferenca STO, zagotovil okrepitev proračunske vrstice 3 0 4 4, da se pokrijejo stroški za organizacijo vzporednega zasedanja parlamentarne konference o STO;
Points out that, should a WTO Ministerial Conference be organised in 2011, Parliament would guarantee the reinforcement of budget line 3 0 4 4 in order to cover the costs connected with the organisation, in parallel, of a session of the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO;
Pripravljavec mnenja želi s tem mnenjem zagotoviti, da bodo v proračunu upoštevana načela in priporočila za dobro finančno poslovodenje in preglednost pri upravljanju sredstev EU, ki jih je sprejel Parlament, zlasti kar zadeva stroškovno učinkovitost različnih politik EU.
The rapporteur’s aim in this opinion has been to ensure that the budget takes into account the principles and recommendations adopted by Parliament on sound financial management and transparency in the management of EU funds, particularly as regards the cost‑effectiveness of the various EU policies.
Glej odstavek 70 resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. maja 2010 s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepov o razrešnici glede izvajanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008, oddelek III - Komisija in izvajalske agencije (UL L 252, 25.9.2010. str.
See paragraph 70 of the European Parliament resolution of 5 May 2010 with observations forming an integral part of its Decisions on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2008, Section III - Commission and executive agencies (OJ L 252, 25.9.2010. p.
Glej odstavek 71 zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 5. maja 2010. ;
See paragraph 71 of the abovementioned resolution of 5 May 2010. ;
Ker gre za prerazporeditev sredstev, ta predlog morda ne bi vplival na proračun;
As the funds are redeployed, this proposal could be budget neutral;
5. predlaga, da se upravnemu odboru in direktorju agencije v primeru nezadostnega proračunskega izvrševanja (stopnja, nižja od 95 %) oziroma v primeru nespoštovanja načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja pošlje uradno opozorilo;
Proposes that the Management Board and the Director of the agency be sent an official warning letter in the event of an unsatisfactory level (below 95%) of budget implementation or in the event of deviations from the principle of sound financial management;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi in uvede obsežno protikorupcijsko politiko in ustvari jasen mehanizem za redno spremljanje razmer v državah članicah;
Urges the Commission to establish and apply a comprehensive anti-corruption policy and create a clear mechanism for monitoring the situation in the Member States on a regular basis;
o stališču Parlamenta o predlogu proračuna za leto 2011, kot ga je spremenil Svet - Oddelek III - Komisija
on Parliament's position on the 2011 Draft Budget as modified by the Council - Section III - Commission
To mnenje se sklicuje na predlog proračuna za proračunsko leto 2011, ki ga je objavila Komisija 27. aprila 2010.
This opinion takes as its reference point the Draft Budget for the financial year 2011 published by the Commission on 27 April 2010.
Razprave o proračuni za leto 2011 spremljajo krhka oživitev gospodarstva, pretresi v območju evra in šibke javne finance v mnogih državah članicah.
The discussions on the Budget 2011 take place in the context of a fragile recovery, turmoil in the Eurozone and weak public finances in many Member States.
V takih razmerah bi lahko preudarna poraba proračuna EU pomagala pri stabilizaciji gospodarstva, pospeševanju kratkoročnega oživljanja, spodbujanju dolgoročne rasti, naložb in delovnih mest.
In such a situation, an EU budget utilized wisely could be instrumental in stabilising the economy, stimulating short term recovery, promoting long-term growth, investments and jobs.
Odločilni elementi za uspeh so jasne povezave med temi tremi vidiki in usmerjena prizadevanja, povezana s konkurenčnostjo, podjetništvom, zaposlovanjem, finančnim nadzorom, statistiko, konkurenco, nadzorom območja evra in strategijo EU 2020.
The keys to success are the clear connections between these three perspectives as well as targeted efforts in the areas of competitiveness, entrepreneurship, employment, financial supervision, statistics, competition, Eurozone surveillance and the EU 2020 strategy.
Glede na te okoliščine Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve vztraja, da se v letu 2011 zagotovi dovolj sredstev za obravnavo dejavnikov, ki so bili prisotni ob nastanku sedanje gospodarske krize.
Against this background, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs insists on putting enough resources in 2011 to tackle some of the factors that were at the origin of the present economic crisis.
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve meni, da je zlasti zelo pomembno zagotoviti kakovostne in natančne statistične podatke, med drugim tudi z ustreznim financiranjem urada Eurostat na eni strani in z oblikovanjem ustrezno delujočih organov EU za finančni nadzor na drugi strani.
In particular, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs attaches great importance to ensuring the quality and accuracy of statistics including through the proper funding of Eurostat, on the one hand, and for the establishment of properly functioning EU financial supervision authorities, on the other hand.
Nedavna študija Parlamenta je pokazala, da proračun EU zajema približno le dva odstotka celotne javne porabe v EU.
A recent Parliament study has pointed to the fact that the EU budget only accounts for approximately 2% of the total public expenditure in the EU.
Povezava med cilji strateške politike EU in proračunskimi politikami je šibka.
The synergy between strategic EU policy objectives and budgetary policies is weak.
Domači proračuni le redko omenjajo sredstva, s katerimi bi prispevali k izpolnjevanju ciljev Lizbonske strategije ali drugih strategij EU.
National budgets have seldom referred to their contribution to achieving the objectives of the Lisbon or other EU strategies.
Pristojni organi držav članic bi morali pristati na to, da se opravi pregled, kako državni proračuni prispevajo k izpolnjevanju ciljev in strategij EU.
Member State authorities should agree to include an overview of their national budgets' contribution to the implementation of the EU objectives and strategies.
Usklajenost bi povečala učinek evropskih politik in omogočila ustvariti resnično evropsko dodano vrednost, hkrati pa podpirala dolgoročne cilje politik.
Coherence would give European policies a greater impact and a true European added value while supporting the long-term policy objectives.
Svet bi v svojih razpravah o proračunu moral ustrezno upoštevati dejstvo, da je proračun EU lahko pozitiven element za spodbujanje rasti.
The fact that the EU budget can be a positive force for stimulating growth should be duly taken into consideration by the Council in the budget discussions.
Obstajajo prepričljivi argumenti za izogibanje splošnemu zmanjševanju sredstev, četudi so razmere za nacionalne javne finance izjemno težavne.
There is a convincing case for avoiding across-the-board cuts even if the situation for national public finances is extremely difficult.
Vprašanja v predlogu proračuna za leto 201, ki zadevajo odbor ECON
ECON issues in the Draft Budget 2011
Podrazdelek 1 a, Konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje, predlaga povišanje sredstev za prevzem obveznosti za 4,4 % (na 13.437 milijonov EUR), in sredstev za plačila za 7 % (na 11.035 milijonov EUR) ter razliko do zgornje meje v znesku 50,1 milijona EUR.
Under sub-heading 1 a, Competitiveness for Growth and Employment , an increase of 4.4 % in CA (to EUR 13 437 million), an increase of 7 % in PA (to EUR 11 035 million) and a margin of EUR 50.1 million is proposed.
Čeprav je splošno povišanje glede na sedanje gospodarske razmere pozitivno in pomembno, je razlika do zgornje meje premajhna, saj dopušča le malo možnosti za ukrepanje na področju, ki je bistveno za prizadevanja za oživitev po krizi.
While the general increases are positive and important given the current economic situation, the margin is too tight, leaving limited room for manoeuvre in an area that is crucial to the post-crisis recovery effort.
Da ne bi spodkopali teh prizadevanj, nove proračunske vrstice, ki se bodo financirale iz tega podrazdelka (finančni nadzorni organi, ITER, GMES in program Kozloduj), ne smejo negativno vplivati na obstoječe programi in ukrepe.
In order to avoid weakening this effort, the existing programmes and actions should not be negatively affected by the new budget lines to be financed under this sub-heading (the financial supervision authorities, ITER,GMES and the Kozloduy programme).
Bistvenega pomena je, da se pojasni, kakšne posledice bo na proračun imela strategija EU 2020.
It is essential that the budgetary implications of the EU 2020 strategy are clarified.
Podrazdelek 1 b, Kohezija za rast in zaposlovanje, predlaga povišanje sredstev za prevzem obveznosti za 3,2 % (na 50.970 milijonov EUR), in sredstev za plačila za 16,9 % (na 42.541 milijonov EUR).
Under sub-heading 1 b, Cohesion for Growth and Employment , an increase of 3.2% in CA (to EUR 50 970 million) and of 16.9% in PA (to EUR 42 541 million) is proposed.
Veliko povišanje sredstev za plačila je zelo dobrodošlo.
The sharp rise in PA is highly welcome.
Povečana poraba bi v posameznih primerih utegnila imeti pozitivne učinke, saj bi spodbudila oživitev gospodarstva v nekaterih evropskih regijah.
Spending increases may in some cases have positive effects by stimulating the economic recovery in some of Europe's regions.
– Naslov 1: Gospodarske in finančne zadeve
- Title 1: Economic and Financial Affairs
Predlagano 5,3-odstotno znižanje odhodkov za Usklajevanje in nadzor ekonomske in monetarne unije (01 02 02) (razdelek 5) ni smiselno glede na pretrese v območju evra in velikega števila postopkov v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
The proposed decrease of 5,3 % in expenditures for the "Coordination and Surveillance of the Economic and Monetary Union" (01 02 02) (heading 5) does not make sense given the ongoing turbulence in the Eurozone and the large number of excessive deficit procedures.
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve je v preteklosti že večkrat poudaril, da je temu vprašanju treba nameniti dovolj sredstev.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs has several times in the past underlined the need to allocate enough resources in that respect.
Predlagano krčenje še toliko bolj preseneča, saj je Komisija sama predlagala, naj se okrepi gospodarsko upravljanje v območju evra, za kar bodo seveda potrebna dodatna sredstva.
The suggested cut is all the more surprising since the Commission itself proposes to reinforce the economic governance of the Eurozone, which will naturally require more means.
– Naslov 2: Podjetništvo
- Title 2: Enterprise
Oblikovanje in uresničevanje poslovnih zamisli in inovacije so nujni za to, da mala in srednja podjetja lahko v celoti izkoristijo priložnosti, ki jih nudi domači trg.
The development and implementation of business ideas and innovation is crucial in order for the SMEs to fully exploit the opportunities offered by the internal market.