natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Treba je sprejeti predpise o politiki obveščanja med Uradom in javnostjo ter opozoriti na načela in sestavne dele uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 (člen 49), ki jih je treba vključiti v postopkovna pravila, vključno z disciplinskimi ukrepi za primer razkritja.
It is desirable to lay down provisions concerning OLAF's policy on communicating with the public and to recall here the principles and provisions of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 (Article 49) to be inserted in the procedural code (including disciplinary punishments in the event of a leak).
Člen 1 – točka 10 a
Article 1 – point 10 – subpoint a
Nadzorni odbor krepi neodvisnost Urada z rednim spremljanjem izvajanja preiskovalne funkcije.
The Supervisory Committee shall reinforce the Office’s independence by regular monitoring of the implementation of the investigative function.
Nadzorni odbor z rednim spremljanjem izvajanja preiskovalne funkcije zagotavlja, da Urad popolnoma neodvisno izvaja pristojnosti, ki jih določa ta uredba .
The Supervisory Committee shall ensure that the Office exercises in full independence the competences conferred upon it by this Regulation by regular monitoring of the implementation of the investigative function .
Nadzorni odbor:
The Supervisory Committee shall:
Nadzorni odbor poskrbi za skladnost s pravili, ki urejajo izmenjavo podatkov med Uradom in institucijami, organi, uradi in agencijami .
The Supervisory Committee shall ensure that the rules governing information exchanges between the Office and the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies are complied with.
a) poskrbi za skladnost s pravili, ki urejajo izmenjavo podatkov med Uradom in institucijami, organi, uradi in agencijami ;
(a) ensure that the rules governing information exchanges between the Office and the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies are complied with ;
Nadzorni odbor spremlja dogajanja v zvezi z uporabo postopkovnih jamstev in trajanjem preiskav glede na redne statistične podatke, ki jih pošilja generalni direktor Urada, ter redna mnenja in analitična poročila, ki jih v tej zvezi pripravi revizijski svetovalec , in ki so pripravljena na podlagi tesnega sodelovanja z generalnim direktorjem Urada.
The Supervisory Committee shall monitor developments regarding the application of procedural guarantees and the duration of investigations in the light of the periodic statistics supplied by the Director General of the Office and the opinions and analysis reports regularly drawn up in this connection by the Review Adviser on the basis of close cooperation with the Director General of the Office.
b) spremlja dogajanja v zvezi z uporabo postopkovnih jamstev in trajanjem preiskav glede na redne statistične podatke, informacije in poročila o preiskavah , ki mu jih posreduje generalni direktor Urada, ter glede na mnenja revizijskega svetovalca;
(b) monitor developments regarding the application of procedural guarantees and the duration of investigations in the light of the periodic statistics , information and investigation reports supplied to it by the Director General of the Office and the opinions drawn up by the Review Adviser ;
c) pomaga generalnemu direktorju in pri tem zagotavlja, da Urad razpolaga s potrebnimi sredstvi za opravljanje svoje preiskovalne dejavnosti;
(c) assist the Director General, ensuring that the Office has the resources needed to carry out its investigative task;
d) daje mnenja in priporočila o:
(d) give opinions and recommendations on:
– opredelitvi prednostnih nalog preiskave;
– the identification of priorities for investigation;
– trajanju preiskav in ukrepih, ki so sprejeti na njihovi podlagi;
– the duration of investigations and action taken on investigations;
– postopkovna pravila;
– the procedural code ;
e) daje mnenja o nastopih generalnega direktorja pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti in nacionalnimi sodišči;
(e) give opinions on action by the Director General before the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the national courts;
f) pomaga generalnemu direktorju v postopku dogovarjanja.
(f) assist the Director General in the con certa tion procedure.
g) lahko pozove Komisijo ali drugo institucijo pred Sodišče, če meni, da so sprejele ukrepe, ki zbujajo dvom o neodvisnosti generalnega direktorja Urada.
(g) The Supervisory Committee may bring the Commission or any other institution before the Court of Justice, when it considers that these institutions took measures which call the independence of the Director General of the Office into question.
Odbor pošilja mnenja generalnemu direktorju Urada na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo generalnega direktorja ali na zahtevo institucije, organa, urada ali agencije, vendar pa se ne vmešava v izvajanje preiskav v teku.
The Supervisory Committee shall deliver opinions to the Director General of the Office, on its own initiative or at his request or the request of an institution, body, office or agency, without however interfering with the conduct of investigations in progress.
Prosilcu se pošlje izvod takih mnenj.“
The applicant shall be provided with a copy of such opinions.”
Ta določba pojasnjuje naloge, ki se dodelijo nadzornemu odboru tako, da jamči in zagotavlja neodvisnost Urada.
Clarifies the tasks of the Supervisory Committee by safeguarding the Office’s independence.
Člen 1 – točka 10 a a (novo)
Article 1 – point 10 a a (new)
(aa) Odstavek 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(aa) Paragraph 2 is replaced by the following text:
Odbor sestavlja pet neodvisnih zunanjih oseb, ki v trenutku svojega imenovanja opravljajo visoko sodno, preiskovalno ali primerljivo funkcijo, ki je povezana z dejavnostmi Urada.
It shall be composed of five independent outside persons occupying, at the time of their appointment, senior judicial or investigative posts or comparable relating to the Office’s areas of activity.
Od njih se zahteva znanje o delovanju evropskih institucij in znanje drugega uradnega jezika Unije.“
They must possess a knowledge of the workings of the European institutions and of a second official EU language.”
Od kandidatov za člane nadzornega odbora se mora zahtevati operativne praktične izkušnje na področju boja proti goljufijam, poglobljeno znanje o delovanju evropskih institucij in znanje drugega uradnega jezika Unije, po možnosti delovnega jezika Komisije.
Operational practical experience in the field of combating fraud and a thorough knowledge of the workings of the institutions and of a second EU official language, preferably a working language of the Commission, should be required of candidates for membership of the Supervisory Committee.
Člen 1 – točka 10 a b (novo)
Article 1 – point 10 a b (new)
Člen 11 – odstavek 2 – alinea 1 a (novo)
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
ab) V odstavku 2 se doda naslednji pododstavek:
(a b ) The following subparagraph is added to paragraph 2 :
„Člane odbora soglasno imenujejo Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija.
“The members of the committee shall be appointed by common agreement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Razpis za oddajo prijav se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
A call for applications shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Pet članov se izbere na podlagi „seznama predizbora“, ki ga predloži Komisija in vsebuje najmanj 12 kandidatov.“
The five persons shall be chosen on the basis of a ‘preselection list’ submitted by the Commission, comprising at least 12 candidates.”
Člane odbora imenujejo institucije soglasno na podlagi seznama, ki ga predloži Komisija.
The members of the committee are to be appointed by common agreement between the institutions on the basis of a list submitted by the Commission.
Da bi bil postopek imenovanja članov čimbolj pregleden, je treba predvideti objavo mnenja o oddaji prijav.
In order to ensure maximum transparency in the procedure for appointing members, provision should be made for publication of the call for applications.
Člen 1 – točka 10 a c (novo)
Article 1 – point 10 – subpoint a c (new)
ac) Odstavek 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(a c ) paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
Mandat članov traja pet let in se ne podaljša.
The term of office of members shall be five years and shall not be renewable.
Za ohranitev strokovnega znanja in izkušenj v odboru je treba nekatere njegove člane imenovati s časovnim zamikom.“
Some members shall be appointed at a staggered interval to preserve the Committee’s expertise.”
Poleg tega je za ohranitev strokovnega znanja in izkušenj v odboru dobro del njegovih članov imenovati s časovnim zamikom.
Moreover to preserve the Committee’s expertise part of its membership should be appointed at a staggered interval.
Člen 1 – točka 10 a d (novo)
Article 1 – point 10 a d
ad) Odstavek 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(ad) Paragraph 6 is replaced by the following text:
Sestanki nadzornega odbora so sklicani na pobudo predsednika ali generalnega direktorja Urada. […] Svoje sklepe sprejema z večino glasov svojih članov.
Meetings of the Supervisory Committee shall be convened on the initiative of its chairman or of the Director General of the Office . […] It shall take its decisions by a majority of its members.
Tajništvo zagotavlja urad. “
Its secreta ria t shall be provided by the Office.”
Postopek sprejemanja poslovnika je zasnovan po zgledu Sodišča.
The procedure for adopting the committee's rules of procedure is based on that for the Court of Justice.
Upošteva določene odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje, zlasti o vplivu poslovnika nadzornega odbora na ocenjevanje operativnega dela Urada.
It takes account of certain points on which the Court of First Instance has handed down rulings, particularly the impact of the committee's rules of procedure with a view to assessment of the operational work of OLAF.
Za večjo prožnost in potrebe Urada ni treba več predpisovati števila sestankov odbora.
In order to increase flexibility and cater for OLAF's needs, it is desirable no longer to prescribe the number of meetings to be held by the committee.
Člen 1 – točka 10 b
Article 1 – point 10 b
Člen 11 – odstavek 7 – alinea 2 – točka b
Article 11 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 - point b
b) primerih, ko se podatki pošljejo sodnim organom države članice .
(b) of cases in which information is forwarded to the judicial authorities of a Member State .
b) primerih, ko pristojni organ držav članic ne upošteva priporočil Urada .
(b) of cases in which the competent authorit ies of the Member State s ha ve not acted upon the recommendations it has made .
Ker nadzorni odbor ne more vplivati na potek preiskav, ki so v teku, je treba določiti, da zakonitost prenosa podatkov pristojnih organov države članice interno preverjajo „sodni svetovalci“ Urada, ki imajo dostop do preiskovalne dokumentacije.
As the Supervisory Committee cannot interfere in the conduct of current investigations, it is desirable to stipulate that the review of legality when forwarding information to the competent authorities of a Member State should be performed internally by the 'Review Advisers' of OLAF who have access to the file on the investigation.
Ta določba zagotavlja resničen nadzor nad zakonitostjo.
This provision ensures a genuine review of legality.
Člen 11 – odstavek 8
Article 11 – paragraph 8
Nadzorni odbor vsako leto sprejme vsaj eno poročilo o svojem delu, ki obsega področje uporabe postopkovnih jamstev ter trajanja preiskav; taka poročila se pošljejo institucijam.
The Supervisory Committee shall adopt at least one report on its activities per year, covering in particular the application of procedural guarantees and the duration of investigations; such reports shall be sent to the institutions.
Odbor lahko Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču predloži poročila o rezultatih preiskav Urada in o ukrepih, sprejetih na podlagi teh rezultatov.
The Committee may submit reports to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors on the results of the Office’s investigations and the action taken thereon.
Od odbora je treba zahtevati tudi poročanje o oceni neodvisnosti Urada.
It is important to ask the committee also to report on the assessment of the independence of OLAF.
Člen 11 a (novo)
Article 11 a
Strukturirani dialog z institucijami
Structured dialogue with the institutions
Postopek dogovarjanja
Consultation procedure
Nadzorni odbor se v okviru strukturiranega dialoga na politični ravni sestaja vsaj dvakrat na leto in na zahtevo ene od institucij z namenom, da pripravi skupne smernice; Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija določijo po enega predstavnika.
The Supervisory Committee shall meet, at least twice a year and at the request of one of the institutions, with one representative designated by each of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, as part of a structured dialogue at political level in order to devise common guidelines.
Vzpostavljen je postopek dogovarjanja med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo.
A concertation procedure between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall be established.
Strukturirani dialog zadeva preiskovalno funkcijo Urada, zlasti pa :
The structured dialogue shall relate to the Office’s investigative function, and in particular to:
Postopek dogovarjanja obsega:
The concertation procedure shall relate to:
a) letno poročilo o dejavnostih nadzornega odbora in generalnega direktorja Urada;
(a) the annual report on the activities of the Supervisory Committee and that of the Director General of the Office;
a) odnose in sodelovanje med Uradom in državami članicami ter med slednjimi, zlasti:
a) the relations and cooperation between the Office and the Member States , and among the latter, in particular:
b) program preiskovalnih dejavnosti Urada ;
(b) the Office’s programme of investigative activities;
– usklajevanje ukrepov, sprejetih na podlagi člena 1 ;
- coordination of actions taken pursuant to Article 1;
c) vidike prednostnih nalog politike Urada na področju preiskav ;
(c) aspects relating to the Office’s investigation policy priorities;
– izvajanje in uporabo te uredbe, uredbe (Euratom, ES) št. 2988/95 in uredbe (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96 ter Konvencije z dne 26. julija 1995 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti in njenih protokolov ;
- the implementation and application of the present regulation, Regulation (EC, Euratom) No2988/95 and Regulation (Euratom , EC ) No218 5 /9 6 , as well as of the Convention on the protection of the financial interests of the European Communities of 26 July 1995 and its protocols;
d) dobre odnose med uradom in institucijami, organi, uradi in agencijami ;
(d) good relations between the Office and the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies;
– ukrepi, sprejeti na podlagi končnih poročil o preiskavah Urada, in ukrepi, sprejeti na podlagi prenosa podatkov Urada ;
- the action taken on the Office’s final investigation reports and the action taken further to the forwarding of information by the Office;
e) učinkovitost dela, ki ga opravita Urad v svoji preiskovalni funkciji in nadzorni odbor.
(e) the effectiveness of the work of the Office with regard to investigations and that of the Supervisory Committee.
b) odnose in sodelovanje med Uradom ter institucijami, organi, uradi in agencijami Unije in Evropskih skupnosti, vključno z Eurojustom in Europolom, zlasti pomoč, ki jo institucije nudijo Uradu, in ukrepe , sprejete na podlagi končnih poročil o preiskavi ali prenos podatkov Urada;
(b) the relations and cooperation between the Office and the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and the European Communities, including Eurojust and Europol, including the assistance offered to the Office by the institutions and the action taken on final investigation reports or further to forwarding of information by the Office;
Strukturirani dialog ne posega v potek preiskav.
The structured dialogue shall not interfere with the conduct of investigations.
c) odnose in sodelovanje med Uradom in pristojnimi organi tretjih držav ter mednarodnimi organizacijami v okviru sporazumov, ki jih zajema ta uredba;
(c) the relations and cooperation between the Office and the competent authorities in third countries, as well as with international organisations, in the framework of the agreements referred to in the present regulation;
Urad sprejme primerne ukrepe za mnenja, izražena v strukturiranem dialogu.
The Office shall take such action as is approp ria te on the opinions expressed in the structured dialogue.
d) vidike prednostnih nalog politike Urada na področju preiskav ;
(d) aspects relating to the Office’s investigation policy priorities;
e) poročila in analize nadzornega odbora.
(e) the Supervisory Committee’s reports and analyses;
Dogovarjanje poteka najmanj enkrat letno na zahtevo ene od institucij.
Consultation shall take place at least once a year and at the request of one of the institutions.
Generalni direktor Urada in predsednik nadzornega odbora sodelujeta pri postopku dogovarjanja.
The Director General of the Office and the chairman of the Supervisory Committee shall take part in the concertation procedure .
Predstavniki Računskega sodišča, Eurojusta in Europola so lahko povabljeni.
Representatives of the Court of Auditors, Eurojust and Europol may be invited.
Dogovarjanje poteka na enem ali več sestankih tehnične narave.
Consultation shall be prepared at one or more technical meetings.
Sestanki se skličejo na zahtevo ene od institucij ali na zahtevo Urada.
The meetings shall be convened at the request of one of the institutions or of the Office.
Postopek dogovarjanja v nobenem primeru ne vpliva na potek preiskav in se izvaja ob strogem upoštevanju neodvisnosti generalnega direktorja.
The concertation procedure may not under any circumstances interfere with the conduct of investigations and shall be carried out with full respect for the independence of the Director General.
Institucije, organi, uradi ali agencije, Urad in države članice vsakič obvestijo udeležence v postopku dogovarjanja o ukrepih, sprejetih na podlagi zaključkov postopka dogovarjanja.
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, the Office and the Member States shall inform the parties to the concertation procedure of the action taken further to the conclusions of the concertation procedure on every occasion.
Ta postopek zakonodajalcu Skupnosti, proračunskemu organu in Komisiji daje priložnost za razpravo o različnih vidikih boja proti goljufiji.
This procedure enables the Community legislature, the budgetary authority and the Commission to discuss various aspects relating to fighting fraud.
Omogoča iskanje ustreznih rešitev (operativnih, zakonodajnih, institucionalnih) za težave, s katerimi se Urad srečuje v okviru svojih nalog.
It makes it possible to identify the appropriate solutions (operational, legislative, institutional) to the difficulties encountered by OLAF in carrying out its remit.
Ta postopek med drugim povzema pripombe Sveta na predlog Komisije („komitologija“).
This procedure, incidentally, takes account of the Council's considerations concerning the Commission proposal ('commitology').
Člen 1 – točka 12 a
Article 1 - point 12 a
Posvetovanja se organizirajo na podlagi seznama kandidatov, ki ga sestavi Komisija po razpisu.
The consultation shall be organised on the basis of a list of candidates drawn up by the Commission after a call for applications.
Urad vodi generalni direktor, ki ga določi Komisija in katerega mandat traja pet let in ga je mogoče enkrat obnoviti .
The Office shall be placed under the authority of a Director General appointed by the Commission for a term of five years , which may be renewed once.
Evropski parlament in Svet soglasno izbereta generalnega direktorja na podlagi seznama šestih kandidatov, ki ga predloži Komisija.
The European Parliament and the Council shall designate the Director General by common agreement on the basis of a list of 6 candidates put forward by the Commission.
Imenovanje se opravi v treh mesecih od dneva, ko Komisija predloži seznam kandidatov.
The appointment shall be made within three months of the list of candidates being put forward by the Commission.
Postopek v celoti ne sme trajati dlje kot devet mesecev in se mora začeti najmanj devet mesecev pred koncem mandata takratnega generalnega direktorja, ki opravlja svojo funkcijo do začetka mandata novega generalnega direktorja.
The duration of the appointment procedure as a whole may not exceed nine months and the procedure must begin at least nine months before the end of the term of office of the incumbent, who shall remain in office until the beginning of the new Director General’s term of office.
Če Evropski parlament in/ali Svet ne nasprotujeta obnovitvi mandata generalnega direktorja najmanj devet mesecev pred iztekom njegovega prvega mandata, Komisija njegov mandat podaljša.
If the European Parliament and/or the Council do not oppose the renewal of the Director General’s mandate at latest nine months before his/her first mandate expires, the Commission will proceed to extend the mandate of the Director- General.
Nasprotovanje podaljšanju mandata mora biti utemeljeno.
The opposition against the extension of the mandate should be justified.
V nasprotnem primeru se uporabi določba o postopku imenovanja iz tretje alinee tega odstavka.
Otherwise, the nomination procedure foreseen by the third subparagraph of this paragraph applies.
Člen 1 – točka 12 b
Article 1 – point 12 b
(b) Odstavek 2 se črta.
(b) paragraph 2 is deleted;
Imeti morajo poglobljeno znanje o delovanju evropskih institucij in znanje drugega uradnega jezika Unije.
He/she must have a thorough knowledge of the workings of the European institutions and of a second official language of the Union .
Njihova neodvisnost mora biti nedvomna.
His/her independence must be beyond doubt.
Smotrno je opredeliti merila, ki jih mora izpolnjevati kandidat za imenovanje na mesto generalnega direktorja Urada.
It would be wise to state specifically the criteria which the candidate must satisfy in order to be appointed to the post of Director General of OLAF.
Iz praktičnih razlogov bi bilo treba zahtevati znanje najmanj enega delovnega jezika Komisije.
For practical reasons, a knowledge of at least one of the Commission's working languages must be required.
Člen 1 – točka 12 c
Article 1 - point 12 c
c) V odstavku 3 se „direktor“ nadomesti z „generalni direktor“.
(c) in paragraph 3 , “the Director” is replaced by “the Director General”;
c) Odstavek 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(c) paragraph 3 is replaced by the following text:
Generalni direktor pri opravljanju svojih nalog v zvezi z začetkom in izvajanjem zunanjih in notranjih preiskav ali pripravo poročil po zaključku preiskav ne sme zahtevati ali prejemati navodil od vladnih ali drugih institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij.
The Director General shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government or any institution, body, office or agency in the performance of his duties with regard to the opening and carrying out of external and internal investigations or to the drafting of reports following such investigations.
Če generalni direktor meni, da ukrep, ki ga sprejme Komisija, zbuja dvome o njegovi neodvisnosti, o tem nemudoma obvesti nadzorni odbor in ga prosi za mnenje ter se odloči, ali bo vložil tožbo proti zadevni instituciji pred Evropskim sodiščem.
If the Direc tor Gen eral considers that a measure taken by the Commission calls his independence into question, he shall inform immediately the Supervisory Committee for opinion, and decide to bring an action against the institution concerned before the Court of Justice.