natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
S predlog spremembe se poskuša zagotoviti, da bo Evropski parlament – tako kot Svet – obveščen o nadaljnjih ukrepih Bolgarije in Romunije, s katerimi se odzivata na pomanjkljivosti, ki so jih med ocenjevanjem varstva podatkov ugotovili strokovnjaki.
The amendment proposed seeks to make sure that European Parliament is kept informed, like the Council, of the follow-up given by Bulgaria and Romania to the shortcomings identified by the experts in the course of the evaluations on data protection.
Poročevalec želi ob tej priložnosti opozoriti, da je treba vzpostaviti enostaven, učinkovit in pregleden ocenjevalni mehanizem, ki bi moral dopolnjevati sedanje schengensko ocenjevanje ter omogočati ohranitev schengenskega območja kot območja prostega gibanja.
The Rapporteur takes this opportunity to recall the need for the establishment of a simple, effective and transparent evaluation mechanism, which should complement the actual Schengen evaluation and enable the Schengen area to be preserved as an area of free movement.
Ker je ogrožena varnost schengenskega območja in njegovih državljanov, bi morali vsi pomembni akterji v celoti sodelovati pri vzpostavitvi novega ocenjevalnega sistema, ki bo omogočal zagotavljanje varnosti in krepil načelo medsebojnega zaupanja, ki je bistveno za ohranitev schengenskega območja.
Since the security of the Schengen area and its citizens is at stake, all relevant players should be deeply involved in the establishment of the new evaluation system, which will make possible to guarantee security and strengthen the principal of mutual trust - essential to maintain the Schengen area.
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Sonia Alfano, Emine Bozkurt, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Gál, Sylvie Guillaume, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, baronica Sarah Ludford, Monica Luisa Macovei, Nuno Melo, Claude Moraes, Carmen Romero López, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Axel Voss, Tatjana Ždanoka
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Sonia Alfano, Emine Bozkurt, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Gál, Sylvie Guillaume, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Monica Luisa Macovei, Nuno Melo, Claude Moraes, Carmen Romero López, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Axel Voss, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Andrew Henry William Brons, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Ana Gomes, Stanimir Ilčev (Stanimir Ilchev), Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Zuzana Roithová, Ernst Strasser, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström
Edit Bauer, Andrew Henry William Brons, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Ana Gomes, Stanimir Ilchev, Mariya Nedelcheva, Zuzana Roithová, Ernst Strasser, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström
o stališču Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, Oddelek III – Komisija
on Council's position on draft amending budget No 4/2010 of the European Union for the financial year 2010, Section III – Commission
o stališču Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, Oddelek III – Komisija
on Council's position on Draft amending budget No 4/2010 of the European Union for the financial year 2010, Section III – Commission
– ob upoštevanju členov 310 in 314 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in člena 106a Pogodbe o Euratomu,
– having regard to Articles 310 and 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 106a of the Euratom Treaty,
1. , zlasti členov 15(3), 37 in 38,
1. ('the Financial Regulation'), and particularly Article 15(3) and Articles 37 and 38 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, ki je bil dokončno sprejet 17. decembra 2009
– having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010, as finally adopted on 17 December 2009
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna št. 4 za splošni proračun 2010, ki ga je Komisija predložila 16. aprila 2010 ( KOM(2010)0169 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 4 to the general Budget 2010 , which the Commission presented on 16 April 2010 ( COM(2010)0169 ),
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010, ki ga je Svet pripravil dne 11. junija 2010 (10930/2010 – C7-0153/2010 ),
– having regard to Council's position on Draft amending budget No 4/2010 established on 11 June 2010 (10930/2010 - C7-0153/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0200/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0200/2010 ),
A. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010, da se v proračun za leto 2010 vključi presežek iz proračunskega leta 2009, ki znaša 2.253.591.199,37 EUR,
A. whereas Draft amending budget No 4/2010 aims to enter in the 2010 budget the surplus of the 2009 financial year, amounting to EUR 2 253 591 199,37,
B. ker je presežek nastal predvsem zaradi vknjižbe previsokih prihodkov v višini 400.703.258 EUR, neporabljenih odobrenih sredstev za odhodke v višini 1.667.346.181 EUR in pozitivnega salda zaradi tečajnih razlik v znesku 185.541.760 EUR,
B. whereas the main components of this surplus are an over-registering in revenue of EUR 400 703 258, an under-spending in expenditure of EUR 1 667 346 181 and positive exchange rate differences for EUR 185 541 760,
C. ker so neporabljena sredstva za plačila v letu 2009 v razdelku 1 znašala 451 milijonov EUR, v razdelku 2 so bila 244 milijonov EUR, v razdelku 3 so znašala 106 milijonov EUR, v razdelku 4 so bila 603 milijone EUR, v razdelku 5 pa 263 milijonov EUR,
C. whereas for heading 1 the under-spending of payment appropriations in 2009 amounted to EUR 451 million, for heading 2 to EUR 244 million, for heading 3 to EUR 106 million, for heading 4 to EUR 603 million and for heading 5 to EUR 263 million,
D. ker bo skupni učinek zelo majhnih razlik do proračunske zgornje meje in vse večjih potreb po finančnih sredstvih ogrozil obstoječe politične prednostne naloge, precejšnja neporabljena sredstva pa hkrati ovirajo izvajanje politik EU,
D. whereas the combined effect of the very tight budgetary margins and emerging financial needs is to put at risk existing political priorities, while significant under-spending reduces at the same time the delivery of EU policies,
E. ker je pri izračunu neporabljenih sredstev v proračunu za leto 2009 treba upoštevati dve spremembi proračuna, št. 4/2010 in št. 10/2009,
E. whereas the calculation of 2009 budgetary under-implementation should take account of both Amending budgets Nos 4/2010 and 10/2009,
V odstavku 3 je zapisano, da ga „proračunski organ obravnava ob upoštevanju nujnosti zadeve“.
3 states that "the budgetary authority shall discuss them with due account for their urgency".
Odstavek 3 člena 15 finančne uredbe navaja, da se bilanca vsakega proračunskega leta, naj gre za presežek ali primanjkljaj, vnese v proračun za naslednje proračunsko leto kot prihodek ali odhodek s spremembo proračuna, ki jo Komisija predloži v 15 dnevih po predložitvi začasnega zaključnega računa.
Article 15, par 3 Financial Regulation stipulates that the surplus from each financial year, whether surplus or deficit, is entered as revenue or expenditure in the budget of the subsequent financial year through an amending budget to be submitted by the Commission within 15 days following the submission of the provisional accounts.
Komisija je v petek, 16. aprila 2010, sprejela predlog spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010, s katero naj bi se v proračun vključil presežek, ki je nastal pri izvrševanju proračuna za leto 2009 .
On Friday 16 April 2010, Commission adopted draft amending budget n° 04/2010 which aims at budgeting the surplus resulting from the implementation of the budget year 2009.
Pri izvrševanju proračuna za leto 2009 je nastal presežek v višini 2.253.591.199 EUR.
The implementation of the budget year 2009 shows a surplus of 2 253 591 199 EUR.
Zaradi vključitve tega presežka v proračun EU se bo skupni prispevek držav članic v proračun zmanjšal.
The budgeting of the surplus will diminish accordingly the global contribution of the Member States to the financing of the EU Budget.
Pri izvrševanju proračuna za leto 2009 je nastal presežek v znesku 2.253.591.199 EUR , ki je posledica:
The implementation of the budget year 2009 shows a surplus of EUR 2 253 591 199 which mainly results from:
– višjih prihodkov, kot je bilo pričakovano (+ 400.703.257,66 EUR);
- Higher than expected revenues (+ EUR 400 703 257,66);
– nezadostnega izvrševanja plačil (– 1.667.346.181,32 EUR);
- Under-implementation of payments appropriations (- EUR 1 667 346 181,32);
– tečajnih razlik (+ 185.541.760,39 EUR).
- Exchange rate differences (+ EUR 185 541 760,39).
Neporabljena sredstva za plačila je mogoče razčleniti takole:
The unspent payment appropriations can be further broken down as follows:
– razdelek 1: 451 milijonov EUR;
- for Heading 1: EUR 451 million;
– razdelek 2: 244 milijonov EUR;
- for Heading 2 to EUR 244 million;
– razdelek 3: 106 milijonov EUR;
- for Heading 3 to EUR 106 million;
– razdelek 4: 603 milijone EUR in
- for Heading 4 to EUR 603 million and
– razdelek 5: 263 milijonov EUR.
- for Heading 5 to EUR 263 million.
Presežek je posledica razlik med proračunom EU, ki ga je sprejel proračunski organ, in dejansko izvršenim proračunom.
This surplus results from the existing gap between the EU budget as voted by the budgetary authority and its actual implementation.
Kot je prikazano v spodnji tabeli, so se letni proračunski presežki povečevali od leta 2007, kljub spremembam proračuna, sprejetim med proračunskim letom, s katerimi so bila zmanjšana sredstva za plačila in presežki konec leta.
As shown by the table below, annual budget surpluses are increasing since 2007, despite those amending budgets presented in the course of the budget years to reduce the level of payment appropriations and the year-end surpluses.
(v mio EUR)
(million EUR)
Sprememba proračuna za prilagoditev sredstev za plačila
AB adjusting PA
Skupna neporabljena sredstva
Total under-implementation
Zmanjšanje presežkov po letu 2002, prikazano v spodnji tabeli, je v glavnem posledica sprememb proračuna ob koncu leta, ki so bile uvedene v proračunskem letu 2003 in s katerimi so bila v proračunu predvidena plačila zmanjšana glede na najnovejše ocene izvrševanja.
The downwards evolution of the surplus since 2002, as presented in the table below, is mainly due to the introduction of such year-end amending budget since budget year 2003, which reduce budgeted payments in view of updated implementation estimates.
Brez sprememb proračuna ob koncu leta bi se letni presežki gibali takole.
Without such year-end amending budgets, the evolution of annual surpluses would read as follows.
Poleg tega, da spremembe vplivajo na izvrševanje proračuna EU (glej zgoraj), neposredno zmanjšujejo prispevke držav članic v ta proračun že med tekočim proračunskim letom.
In addition to distorting the result of the EU budget implementation (see above), its direct effect is to lower the contributions from Member States to the EU budget already in the course of the budget year.
Brez takšne spremembe proračuna (št. 10/2009 lani) bi na primer presežek za leto 2009 znašal več kot 5 milijard EUR, v glavnem zaradi manjše porabe.
Without such an amending budget (n° 10/2009 last year), 2009 surplus would have been above EUR 5 billion, mainly due to under-spending.
Predlog spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010 ustrezno zmanjšuje skupni prispevek držav članic v proračun EU.
Draft amending budget n°4/2010 diminishes the global contribution of the Member States to the financing of the EU Budget accordingly.
Za proračunsko leto 2009 bo znesek 2.254 milijonov EUR razdeljen takole:
For budget year 2009, the amount of EUR 2 254 million will be distributed in the following way:
Presežek proračuna 2009 (v mio EUR)
Surplus of the 2009 budget ( € million)
Kot je mogoče razbrati, so ti zneski precej visoki in bi jih bilo treba obravnavati v kontekstu zelo majhnih razlik do zgornje meje v proračunu EU in vseh dodatnih potreb po financiranju, ki so v glavnem posledica zahtev držav članic ali sklepov Sveta.
As presented above, the amounts at stake are very significant and should be considered in the context of both the very tight margins of the EU budget and all the additional financing needs emerging notably from Member States and Council's decisions.
Dejstvo, da ne obstaja povezava med sredstvi proračuna EU in nastajajočimi finančnimi potrebami in zavezami, povzroča proračunske napetosti in vrzeli, ki jih je težko zapolniti, ne da bi bile ogrožene nekatere druge prednostne naloge EU.
The existing disconnection between the resources of the EU budget and emerging financial needs and commitments creates budgetary tensions and gaps that hard to fill without jeopardizing some other EU priorities.
To se je nedavno pokazalo pri pobudi svetovnega spremljanja okolja in varnosti (GMES), treh novih finančnih organih, spremljevalnih ukrepih za banane ter skladu za prilagajanje globalizaciji, če naštejemo le nekaj primerov.
This has recently been the case for GMES, the three new financial authorities, Bananas accompanying measures, the Globalisation Fund, only to name a few.
Glede na omenjeno in glede na zelo zaostrene proračunske razmere poročevalec ne more spregledati možnosti, da bi se presežni znesek porabil v proračunu za leto 2010 in naslednjih proračunih v sedanjem večletnem finančnem okviru.
In this context, your Rapporteur cannot help considering such an amount in view of the very tense budgetary situation, for Budget 2010 and following budgets in the current MFF.
Po njegovem mnenju bi moral odbor na tej stopnji obravnavati naslednja teoretična vprašanja: 1) kakšne so morebitne alternative povračilu tega zneska državam članicam, 2) samodejnost povračila brez politične razprave, 3) ali je res potrebno povračilo celotnega zneska.
At this stage, the theoretical questions of 1) possible alternatives to such a transfer to Member States, 2) the latter's automatic character, without political debate, 3) the need for the entire amount of the surplus to be paid back should, in your Rapporteur's view, be considered by the Committee.
Poročevalec želi tudi poudariti, da države članice zaradi sprememb proračuna ob koncu leta, s katerimi se prilagodi raven plačil, v proračun EU vsako leto plačajo manj, kot je bilo prvotno predvideno.
Your Rapporteur would also like to stress that, thanks to the year-end amending budgets adjusting the level of payments, Member States already pay less than their initial foreseen contribution to the EU budget for any given year.
Iz zornega kota držav članic morebitna ponovna uporaba tega presežka ne bi pomenila povečanja njihovih odhodkov, temveč zmanjšanje nepričakovanih prihodkov.
From a Member States' point of view, the possible reuse of this surplus would not increase their expenditure but rather decrease unexpected revenues.
Na koncu želi poročevalec člane odbora BUDG opozoriti na morebitne pravne omejitve, ki veljajo za ukrepanje EP v zvezi s tem, in sicer tako glede morebitnih predlogov sprememb k tej spremembi proračuna in rokov za njeno sprejetje kot glede morebitne ponovne dodelitve omenjenih neporabljenih sredstev, upoštevaje, da njihova zamrznitev v času gospodarske in socialne krize ne bi bila sprejemljiva.
Finally, your Rapporteur wishes to draw BUDG members' attention to the possible legal limitations that apply to EP's action in this respect, both concerning any possible amendments to this amending budget and the deadlines for adopting it, as well as the possible reallocation of these unspent funds, bearing in mind that freezing them would not be acceptable in times of economic and social crises.
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o pooblastilu držav članic za pristop h Konvenciji o mednarodnih razstavah, podpisani 22. novembra 1928 v Parizu in dopolnjeni s protokoli z dne 10. maja 1948, 16. novembra 1966, 30. novembra 1972 ter spremembo z dne 24. junija 1982 in spremembo z dne 31. maja 1988
on the draft Council decision authorising Member States to accede to the Convention relating to international exhibitions signed at Paris on 22 November 1928 and supplemented by the Protocols of 10 May 1948, 16 November 1966, 30 November 1972 and the Amendment of 24 June 1982 and the Amendment of 31 May 1988
Poročevalec: George Sabin Cutaş
Rapporteur: George Cutaş
PREDLOG ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................5
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE...........................................................................7
PREDLOG ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (08100/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (08100/2010),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 207(4) in členom 218(6)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0105/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 207(4) , first subparagraph, and Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0105/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 81 in 90 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 81 and 90 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7-0201/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A7‑0201/2010 ),
Namen Pariške konvencije o mednarodnih razstavah je urediti pogostost, kakovost in postopke mednarodnih razstav, ki spadajo v njeno pristojnost.
The function of the Paris Convention on international exhibitions is to regulate the frequency, quality and procedures of international exhibitions falling within its remit.
Glavni namen mednarodnih razstav je, kot je določeno v Pariški konvenciji, omogočiti razstavljanje inovacij in prispevati k izobraževanju javnosti.
The main purpose of international exhibitions, as stated in the Paris Convention, is to facilitate the display of innovation and contribute to the education of the public.
Pariška konvencija se zato uporablja za vse mednarodne razstave, ki trajajo vsaj tri tedne in ne več kot tri mesece, z izjemo razstav likovnih umetnosti in razstav, ki so predvsem komercialne narave.
The Paris Convention therefore applies to all international exhibitions that last at least three weeks and not more than three months, except for fine Arts exhibitions and exhibitions of an essentially commercial nature.
Ker konvencija ureja vidike, ki spadajo v carinsko zakonodajo Evropske unije, mora država članica, ki želi pristopiti k navedeni konvenciji, dobiti pooblastilo Unije.
As it regulates aspects falling within the European Union customs legislation, a Member State wishing to accede to that Convention therefore requires a Union authorisation.
Odobritev začasnega uvoza urejajo členi 137 do 144 carinskega zakonika Skupnosti.
Granting temporary admission is regulated in Articles 137 to 144 of the Community Customs Code.
Začasni uvozni režim, kakor je določen v carinski zakonodaji Evropske unije, je v celoti skladen s Pariško konvencijo.
The regime of temporary admission as set out in the European Union customs legislation is fully compatible with the Paris Convention.
Carinska zakonodaja Evropske unije je del skupne trgovinske politike, določene s členom 207 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The European Union customs legislation is part of the Common Commercial Policy set out in Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Člen 207 določa, da so ukrepi na nacionalni ravni, vključno s sklepanjem mednarodnih sporazumov, dovoljeni zgolj, če jih Unija izrecno odobri.
Article 207 renders national measures, including the conclusion of international agreements, permissible only if they are specifically authorized by the Union.
Podpisnice Pariške konvencije so lahko samo samostojne države, zato Evropska unija sama ne more pristopiti k njej.
The European Union itself cannot accede to the Paris Convention, as only sovereign States can be parties thereto.
K Pariški konvenciji je do zdaj pristopilo 24 držav članic (z izjemo Latvije, Luksemburga in Irske), Latvija pa je izrazila željo, da pristopi h Konvenciji.
So far 24 Member States, with the exception of Latvia, Luxembourg and Ireland, have acceded to the Paris Convention and Latvia has expressed its wish to accede to that Convention.
Namen sklepa Sveta je torej omogočiti zainteresiranim državam članicam, ki še niso pristopile k Pariški konvenciji, da to storijo ob upoštevanju izključnih pristojnosti, ki jih Evropski uniji podeljuje Lizbonska pogodba.
The purpose of the Council decision is thus to enable the interested Member States, who have not yet acceded to the Paris Convention, to do so while respecting the exclusive competences of the European Union granted by the Lisbon Treaty.
Poročevalec zato meni, da bi moral Evropski parlament odobriti predlog sklepa Sveta o pooblastilu držav članic za pristop h Konvenciji.
Your rapporteur therefore considers that the European Parliament should give its consent to the proposal for a Council decision authorising the Member States to accede to the Paris Convention.
o strategiji Evropske unije za regijo Baltskega morja in vlogi makroregij v prihodnji kohezijski politiki
on the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and the role of macro-regions in the future cohesion policy
Poročevalec: Wojciech Michał Olejniczak
Rapporteur: Wojciech Michał Olejniczak
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................16
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................14
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................20
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 18
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................24
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ................................22
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................28
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................26
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o Strategiji Evropske unije za regijo Baltskega morja ( KOM(2009)0248 konč.) ter okvirnega akcijskega načrta, ki dopolnjuje strategijo,
- having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union Strategy in the Baltic Sea Region ( COM(2009)0248 ) and the indicative action plan accompanying the Strategy,
- ob upoštevanju zaključkov Sveta o strategiji Evropske unije za regijo Baltskega morja, sprejetih dne 26. oktobra 2009,
- having regard to the Council Conclusions on the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region adopted on 26 October 2009,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. julija 2008 o okoljskem vplivu načrtovanega plinovoda v Baltskem morju, ki naj bi povezal Rusijo in Nemčijo
- having regard to its resolution of 8 July 2008 on the environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany
UL C 174E, 3.12.2009, str.3. ,
OJ C 294E, 3.12.2009, p.3.. ,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. novembra 2006 o strategiji za regijo Baltskega morja v okviru severne dimenzije
- having regard to its resolution of 16 November 2006 on a Baltic Sea Strategy for the Northern Dimension
UL C 314E, 21.12.2006, str.
OJ C 314E, 21.12.2006, p.330.. ,