natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Obstoječa pravila, ki se nanašajo na pravico do peticije in izvajanje parlamentarnih pooblastil glede peticij, ki se jih prejme od predlagateljev peticije, so v glavnem dobro prestala časovno preizkušnjo in se izkazala za splošno primerna.
The existing rules related to the right of petition and the exercise of Parliament's authority regarding the petitions received from petitioners have, by and large, well served the test of time and proved to be generally suitable.
Zlasti so zagotovila okvir, s katerim je bil uresničen člen 194 Pogodbe.
In particular they have provided the framework within which Article 194 of the Treaty has been put into practice.
Delo odbora je v zadnjih letih vseeno postalo intenzivnejše, ker so v številnih priložnostih poslanci sami prevzeli pobudo, da bi Parlament kot institucija bil sposoben bolje povezati vprašanja evropskih državljanov.
The work of the committee has however, in recent years, become more intense as the Members themselves have taken the initiative on many occasions in order to ensure that, as an institution, Parliament is in a position to better connect to the concerns of Europe's citizens.
S tem v zvezi je postalo očitno, da bi jim nekatere dopolnitve obstoječih pravil omogočile jasnejši razmislek o stvarnem, postopnem razvoju postopka, ki se uporablja za peticije.
In so doing, it has become apparent that a certain amount of 'fine tuning' of the existing rules would enable them to reflect more clearly the pragmatic and gradual evolution of the treatment they have reserved for petitions.
Ni potrebno in ni ustrezno, da bi zanj predvideli večje spremembe pravil.
It is not considered to be necessary or appropriate to envisage a substantial modification of the rules as they apply to the petitions process.
Zato je eden od ciljev predlagane revizije izboljšanje preglednosti in jasnosti osnovnih pravil, ki jih uporablja odbor ter jih prilagoditi potrebam državljanov iz 27 držav članic Evropske unije.
Accordingly, one of the objectives of the proposed revision is to improve the transparency and the clarity of the basic rules used by the committee and to adapt them to the needs of citizens from a European Union of 27 Member States.
Pravila je treba posodobiti, da bi ohranili skladnost s spremembami, ki jih je glede postopkov poročanja določil Parlament, zlasti predsedstvo.
It is also necessary to update the rules in order to keep pace with changes decided by Parliament, and in particular by the Bureau, regarding reporting procedures.
Potreben je tudi podrobnejši opis povezav med odborom in Komisijo ter Svetom in državami članicami.
A more explicit description of the links between the committee and the Commission, Council and Member States is also required.
Druga posebna točka zahteva nekaj pripomb.
Another particular point requires some comment.
Od sprememb pravil pred nekaj leti je bil dosežen velik napredek v komunikacijski tehnologiji in državljani so danes bolj gotovo povezujejo in organizirajo s spletom.
Since the rules were changed several years ago, enormous progress has been made in the technology of communications and citizens are today more likely to connect and organise by means of the web.
Vedno večje je število peticij, ki se pošiljajo v elektronski obliki in dogaja se tudi, da državljani ob organiziranih kampanjah želijo možnost, da dodajo svoje ime v podporo peticijam, za katere se podpisi še zbirajo ali pa so bili že predloženi in jim želijo dodati svojo podporo.
Petitions are sent electronically in increasing numbers and it is also the case that when organised campaigns get under way, citizens want the facility of adding their names to support petitions for which signatures are either being collected, or have been already submitted and to which they wish to add their support.
Naša pravila in elektronske zmogljivosti morajo to zagotoviti.
Our rules and our electronic facilities need to provide for this.
Sekretariat se pogaja z odgovornimi službami o tehničnih postopkih, ki jih je treba nujno uvesti; zato je treba spremeniti tudi pravila, da bodo to odražala.
With the responsible services, the secretariat is indeed negotiating the technical procedures which must be urgently developed; the rules must therefore also be modified to reflect this.
To se ne sme zamenjati z "registrom" dokumentov, ki ga je Parlament že vzpostavil, zato je treba spremeniti obstoječi člen 192(2).
This should not be confused with the "register" of documents which the Parliament has already established which is why the existing Rule 192(2) needs to be changed.
Zadnja, najpomembnejša točka se nanaša na potrebo po zagotavljanju preglednosti postopka za peticije kot splošnega pravila poleg uvedbe bolj pravno zavezujoče določbe o zasebnosti posameznika in zaupnosti, kadar ju posebej zahtevajo predlagatelji peticije.
A last, most important point, concerns the need to ensure transparency of the petitions process as a general rule alongside the establishment of more legally binding provision regarding individual privacy and confidentiality when specifically requested by petitioners.
Zasebnost se nanaša posebej na ime in osebne podatke predlagatelja peticije; zaupnost pa se nanaša na vsebino zadeve, ki jo predloži predlagatelj peticije, ne glede na to, ali je zahteval, da se njegovo ime ne objavi.
Privacy relates specifically to the name and personal details of the petitioner; confidentiality refers to the substance of the issue raised by the petitioner, whether or not the person involved has or has not requested that their name be withheld.
O prejšnjih osnutkih priloženega dokumenta se je, preden je bil predložen koordinatorjem, razpravljalo na ravni sekretariata s političnimi skupinami.
Previous drafts of the document attached have been subject to discussions at secretariat level with the political groups, before being submitted to coordinators.
O dokumentu s pripombami poročevalcev se lahko sedaj v odboru razpravlja v celoti in konstruktivno.
The document, with the Rapporteur's comments, may now be discussed fully and constructively in Committee.
Odbor za peticije poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Petitions calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its report:
Člen 191, odstavek 3
Rule 191, paragraph 3
Peticije, sestavljene v drugih jezikih, se upoštevajo le, če predlagatelj priloži prevod ali povzetek v enem izmed uradnih jezikov Evropske unije .
Petitions written in any other language will be considered only where the petitioner has attached a translation or summary drawn up in an official language of the European Union .
Peticije, sestavljene v drugih jezikih, se upoštevajo le, če predlagatelj priloži povzetek prevoda v uradnem jeziku .
Petitions written in any other language will be considered only where the petitioner has attached a summary translation in an official language.
Člen 191, odstavek 4 a (novo)
Rule 191, paragraph 4 a (new)
Pri preiskovanju peticij, ugotavljanju dejstev ali iskanju rešitev lahko odbor organizira obiske za ugotavljanje dejstev v države članice ali regije, ki jih peticija zadeva.
When investigating petitions, establishing facts or seeking solutions, the committee may organise fact-finding visits to the Member State or region concerned by the petition.
Osebe, ki sodelujejo pri takih misijah za ugotavljanje dejstev, o tem sestavijo poročilo in ga pošljejo odboru.
Reports of such visits shall be produced by the participants in the fact-finding mission and submitted to the committee.
V vednost se pošlje tudi Evropskemu parlamentu.
They shall also be forwarded for information to the President.
Odbor lahko sklene, da bo sprejel dodatne parlamentarne ukrepe, če meni, da je to potrebno.
The committee may decide to take any further parliamentary action it deems necessary.
Ta predlog spremembe pojasnjuje postopek za poročanje o misijah za ugotavljanje dejstev ter odboru omogoča, da sprejme dodatne ukrepe, če meni, da je to potrebno.
This amendment clarifies the procedure for reporting back on fact finding missions and enables the committee to take further follow up if deemed necessary.
Člen 191, odstavek 5
Rule 191, paragraph 5
Predsednik posreduje v register vpisane peticije pristojnemu odboru, ki najprej ugotovi , ali le-te sodijo na področje delovanja Evropske unije.
Petitions entered in the register shall be forwarded by the President to the committee responsible, which shall first ascertain whether the petitions registered fall within the sphere of activities of the European Union .
Predsednik posreduje v register vpisane peticije pristojnemu odboru, ki ugotovi dopustnost ali nedopustnost peticije v skladu z določbami Pogodbe in odstavkom 1 zgoraj, ter o tem obvesti vlagatelja peticije.
Petitions entered in the register shall be forwarded by the President to the committee responsible, which shall establish the admissibility or otherwise of the petition, in conformity with the provisions of the Treaty and paragraph 1 above, and inform the petitioner accordingly .
Člen 191, odstavek 6
Rule 191, paragraph 6
Peticije, ki jih odbor označi za nedopustne, se arhivirajo; predlagatelj peticije je obveščen o taki odločitvi in razlogih zanjo .
Petitions declared inadmissible by the committee shall be filed ; the petitioner shall be informed of the decision and the reasons therefor .
Peticije, ki jih odbor označi za nedopustne, se arhivirajo in predlagatelj peticije je o tem ustrezno obveščen.
Petitions declared inadmissible by the committee shall be filed and the petitioner shall be informed accordingly.
Če je mogoče, se lahko predlaga druga morebitna pravna sredstva.
Where possible, alternative means of possible redress may be recommended .
Člen 191, odstavek 7
Rule 191, paragraph 7
Člen 191, odstavek 8
Rule 191, paragraph 8
Če predlagatelj posebej ne zahteva zaupnega obravnavanja peticije, se slednja vpiše v javni register.
Unless the person submitting the petition asks for it to be treated in confidence, it shall be entered in a public register .
Člen 191, odstavek 8 a (novo)
Rule 191, paragraph 8 a (new)
Predlagatelji peticije lahko ne glede na določbe odstavka 8 zgoraj zahtevajo, da se njihovo ime ne objavi, tako da se varuje njihova zasebnost, Parlament pa mora tej zahtevi ugoditi.
Notwithstanding the provisions contained in paragraph 8 above, petitioners may request that their name be withheld in order to protect their privacy, in which case Parliament must respect such a request.
Člen 191, odstavek 8 b (novo)
Rule 191, paragraph 8 b (new)
Predlagatelji peticije lahko zahtevajo, da se njihova peticija obravnava zaupno in Parlament mora v tem primeru uvesti ustrezne varnostne ukrepe ter s tem zagotoviti, da se vsebina ne objavi.
Petitioners may request that their petition be treated confidentially, in which case suitable precautions will be taken by Parliament to ensure that the contents are not made public.
Predlagatelji peticije bodo obveščeni o natančnih pogojih uporabe te določbe.
Petitioners will be informed under which precise conditions this provision is to apply.
Člen 191, odstavek 9
Rule 191, paragraph 9
Člen 192, odstavek -1 (novo)
Rule 192, paragraph -1 (new)
Dopustne peticije odbor obravnava pri svoji običajni dejavnosti med razpravo na redni seji ali v pisnem postopku.
Admissible petitions shall be considered by the committee in the course of its normal activity, either through discussion at a regular meeting or by written procedure.
Predlagatelji peticije so lahko vabljeni na seje odbora, če se razpravlja o njihovi peticiji, ali lahko zahtevajo, da so prisotni.
Petitioners may be invited to participate in meetings of the committee if their petition is to be subject to discussion, or they may request to be present.
Predsednik po svoji presoji da besedo predlagateljem peticije.
The right to speak shall be granted to petitioners at the discretion of the Chairman.
Člen 192, odstavek 1
Rule 192, paragraph 1
Odbor lahko pripravi poročilo in Parlamentu predloži na lastno pobudo resolucijo o dopustnosti peticije, o kateri se bo po odobritvi pristojnega organa razpravljalo na plenarnem zasedanju.
The committee may decide to draw up a report and submit a resolution to Parliament on its own initiative concerning an admissible petition which shall be debated in plenary following authorisation from the responsible authority .
Odbor lahko, predvsem v zvezi s peticijami, ki merijo na spremembo obstoječe zakonodaje, prosi za mnenja drugih odborov v skladu s členom 46.
The committee may , particularly in the case of petitions which seek changes in existing law, request opinions from other committees pursuant to Rule 46 .
Odbor lahko zahteva mnenje drugih odborov, ki so posebej pristojni za zadevno vprašanje .
The committee may request opinions from other committees with special competence for the issue under consideration .
Člen 192, odstavek 3
Rule 192, paragraph 3
Pri obravnavi peticij ali ugotavljanju dejstev lahko odbor organizira predstavitve mnenj predlagateljev peticije ali splošne predstavitve mnenj ali pošlje svoje člane na kraj dogajanja zaradi ugotovitve dejstev.
When considering petitions or establishing facts, the committee may organise hearings of petitioners or general hearings or dispatch members to establish the facts of the situation in situ .
Pri preiskovanju peticij, ugotavljanju dejstev ali iskanju rešitev lahko odbor organizira obiske za ugotavljanje dejstev v države članice ali regije, ki jo peticija zadeva.
When investigating petitions , establishing facts or seeking solutions , the committee may organise fact-finding visits to the Member State or region concerned by the petition .
Poročila teh obiskov odobri odbor, ki informacijo posreduje predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta.
Reports of such visits shall be approved by the committee and forwarded for information to the President.
Člen 192, odstavek 4
Rule 192, paragraph 4
Za pripravo svojega mnenja lahko odbor prosi Komisijo, da mu predloži dokumente, posreduje informacije in dovoli vstop v svoje prostore.
With a view to preparing its opinions , the committee may request the Commission to submit documents, to supply information and to grant it access to its facilities .
Za pripravo svojega mnenja o dopustnosti peticije lahko odbor prosi Komisijo, da opravi predhodno raziskavo, zlasti glede posledic za zakone Evropske unije ter določbe Pogodbe, da mu predloži dokumente, posreduje informacije ali mu drugače pomaga.
With a view to preparing its opinion on an admissible petition , the committee may request the Commission to conduct a preliminary investigation, notably as regards the implications for the laws of the European Union and the provisions of the Treaty, to submit documents, supply information or otherwise assist the committee .
Predstavniki Komisije sodelujejo na sejah odbora.
Representatives of the Commission shall participate in meetings of the committee.
Člen 192, odstavek 5
Rule 192, paragraph 5
Odbor lahko svoje mnenje ali priporočilo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu ali organu države članice, ki je pristojen za ukrepanje ali odgovor.
The committee may forward its opinion or recommendation to the Commission, the Council or the Member State authority concerned for action or response .
Vloži lahko vprašanje za ustni odgovor za Svet ali Komisijo za razpravo na plenarnem zasedanju, s priloženo resolucijo za zaključek razprave.
It may table an oral question to the Council or the Commission for debate in plenary, accompanied by a resolution to wind up the debate.
Odbor lahko tudi zahteva, da predsednik njegova mnenja posreduje Komisiji ali Svetu .
The committee may also request that its opinions be forwarded by the President to the Commission or the Council .
Člen 192, odstavek 7
Rule 192, paragraph 7
Predlagatelji peticije so obveščeni o sprejetih odločitvah odbora in o razlogih, ki odločitev utemeljujejo.
Petitioners shall be informed of the decisions taken by the committee and given the reasons justifying the decision .
Člen 193, odstavek 2
Rule 193, paragraph 2
Naslov in povzetek besedil peticij, vpisanih v register, ter besedila mnenj in najpomembnejših odločitev, posredovanih v zvezi z obravnavo peticij, so javnosti na voljo v podatkovni bazi, če se predlagatelj peticije s tem strinja ter če ima odbor potrebne finančne, tehnične in človeške vire za to .
The title and a summary of the texts of petitions entered in the register, together with the texts of the opinions and the most important decisions forwarded in connection with the examination of the petitions, shall be made available to the public in a database, provided the petitioner agrees to this and the committee has the necessary financial, technical and human resources to do so .
Ta predlog spremembe priznava pomembnost virov, ki so potrebni za vzpostavitev javne podatkovne baze.
This amendment recognises the importance of having the required resources as a pre-requisite to establishing a public database.
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o strateškem partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Mehiko
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on an EU-Mexico Strategic Partnership
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU (B6‑0437/2008)..............................................................12
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL (B6‑0437/2008)...............12
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................16
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................15
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................19
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................17
o strateškem partnerstvu med EU in Mehiko
on an EU-Mexico Strategic Partnership
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu o strateškem partnerstvu med EU in Mehiko, ki ga je v imenu skupine PPE-DE predložil José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra ( B6-0437/2008 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council, submitted by José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on an EU-Mexico Strategic Partnership ( B6-0437/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu „Na poti k strateškemu partnerstvu med EU in Mehiko“ ( KOM(2008)0447 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament 'Towards an EU-Mexico Strategic Partnership' ( COM(2008)0447 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. oktobra 2007 o umorih žensk v Mehiki in Srednji Ameriki ter vlogi Evropske unije v boju proti temu pojavu
– having regard to its resolution of 11 October 2007 on the murder of women (feminicide) in Mexico and Central America and the role of the European Union in fighting the phenomenon
UL C 227 E, 4.9.2008, str.
OJ C 227 E, 4.9.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu, političnem usklajevanju in sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Združenimi mehiškimi državami na drugi
– having regard to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other
UL L 276, 28.10.2000, str.
OJ L 276, 28.10.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju deklaracij s petih srečanj voditeljev vlad in držav Latinske Amerike, Karibov in Evropske unije (EU–LAK), ki so doslej potekala v Riu de Janeiru (28. in 29. junija 1999), v Madridu (17. in 18. maja 2002), v Guadalajari (28. in 29. maja 2004), na Dunaju (12. in 13. maja 2006) in v Limi (16. in 17. maja 2008),
– having regard to the declarations of the five summits of heads of state of government of Latin America and the Caribbean and the European Union (EU-LAC), held to date in Rio de Janeiro (28 and 29 June 1999), Madrid (17 and 18 May 2002), Guadalajara (28 and 29 May 2004), Vienna (12 and 13 May 2006) and Lima (16 and 17 May 2008),
– ob upoštevanju skupnega sporočila s četrtega vrhunskega srečanja Mehike in Evropske unije, ki je potekalo v Limi 17. maja 2008,
– having regard to the joint communiqué of the Fourth Mexico-EU summit held in Lima, dated 17 May 2008,
– ob upoštevanju skupnega sporočila z osmega srečanja skupnega odbora EU-Mehika, ki je potekalo v Ciudadu de Mexicu 13. in 14. oktobra 2008,
– having regard to the joint communiqué of the Eighth meeting of the EU-Mexico Joint Committee, held in Mexico City on 13 and 14 October 2008,
– ob upoštevanju skupne deklaracije s srečanja skupnega parlamentarnega odbora EU-Mehika, ki je potekalo v Ciudadu de Mexicu 28. in 29. oktobra 2008,
– having regard to the joint declaration of the meeting of the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) held in Mexico City on 28 and 29 October 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov s srečanja Sveta za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose 13. oktobra 2008,
– having regard to the conclusions of the meeting of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 13 October 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila parlamentarne skupščine EU in Latinske Amerike (EUROLAT) s petega vrhunskega srečanja EU–LAK z dne 1. maja 2008,
– having regard to the message from EUROLAT to the Fifth EU-LAC Summit dated 1 May 2008,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2008 o petem vrhunskem srečanju EU–LAK v Limi
– having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2008 on the Fifth EU-LAC Summit held in Lima
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0177 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0177 . ,
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije iz San Salvadorja, ki je bila sprejeta na 17. vrhunskem srečanju držav Iberskega polotoka in Latinske Amerike, ki je potekalo 29. in 31 oktobra 2008,
– having regard to the San Salvador Declaration adopted at the 17th Iberoamerican Summit of Heads of State and Government, held on 29 and 31 October 2008,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. januarja 2006 o klavzuli o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih Evropske unije
– having regard to its resolution of 23 January 2006 on the human rights and democracy clause in European Union agreements
UL C 290 E, 29.11.2006, str.
OJ C290 E, 29.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju členov 114(3) in 83(5) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 114(3) and 83(5) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6‑0028/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0028/2009 ),
A. ker si Mehika in EU delita številne temeljne vrednote, skupna stališča ter zgodovinske in kulturne povezave,
A. whereas Mexico and the EU share a set of fundamental values, common principles and historical and cultural links,
B. ker je spoštovanje demokratičnih načel in človekovih pravic, kot je določeno v klavzuli o demokraciji, bistveni element strateškega partnerstva in splošnega sporazuma, ki ga morata upoštevati obe strani,
B. whereas respect for democratic principles and human rights, as enshrined in the democracy clause, are an essential element of both the Strategic Partnership and the Global Agreement, and must be respected by both parties,
C. ker Mehika vse bolj utrjuje svojo politično težo na mednarodnem prizorišču, kar na svetovni ravni potrjuje njeno nedavno imenovanje za nestalno članico varnostnega sveta ZN (od 2009 do 2010), na regionalni ravni pa njeno predsedovanje začasnemu sekretariatu skupine Rio (od 2008 do 2010),
C. whereas Mexico is increasingly consolidating its political weight on the international stage, as is confirmed at world level by its recent nomination as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council (for 2009-2010), and at regional level by its presidency of the Pro-Tempore Secretariat of the Rio Group (for 2008-2010),
D. ker je pomembno, da EU prizna prispevek Mehike k večstranskemu sistemu, saj je večstranskost eno od osnovnih načel, ki ga obe strani, Mehika in EU, spodbujata v mednarodnem okolju,
D. whereas it is important that the EU recognises Mexico's contribution to the multilateral system, given that multilateralism is one of the basic principles which both parties, Mexico and the EU, have undertaken to promote in the international sphere,