natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glede na to, da je zaupanje evropskih potrošnikov v digitalno okolje premajhno in da čezmejno e-poslovanje ovirajo številni dejavniki, je obžalovanja vredno, da EU še nima lastne strategije za reševanje tega vprašanja.
In the light of the lack of confidence of European consumers in the digital environment and the many factors that limit cross-border e‑commerce, it is regrettable that the EU currently has no strategy of its own that would help resolve the situation.
Evropski potrošniki in podjetja so žal pogosto deležni le osnovne varnosti pri čezmejnem e-poslovanju v EU, in ta je včasih celo slabša kot pri enakih transakcijah, opravljenih s subjekti zunaj EU.
Sadly, European consumers and business operators often do not enjoy above-standard certainty and protection for cross-border e-commerce within the EU, even compared with carrying out the same transaction with entities outside the EU.
Čeprav je prispevek EU k svetovnemu razvoju pravne ureditve e-poslovanja dragocen, se je treba zavedati, da obstoječa evropska zakonodaja ni dovolj prilagojena najnovejšemu dogajanju v digitalnem okolju, v nekaterih primerih pa je pravzaprav celo ovira – za eno samo elektronsko transakcijo na primer ponavadi velja več predpisov, ki postavljajo različne zahteve, kar pomeni, da ne potrošniki ne podjetja ne morejo računati z jasnimi pravili, ki jih je preprosto izvajati.
While the contribution of EU legislation to the global development of legal regulation of e-commerce is to be valued, it must at the same time be acknowledged that current European legislation does not take sufficient account of the newest trends in the digital environment, and in certain areas it is even more of a hindrance; e.g. one single electronic transaction is usually subject to several legal provisions setting divergent requirements, meaning that neither business operators nor consumers have clear and easily enforceable rules.
Poročevalka meni, da bi bil pomemben korak k povečanju zaupanja potrošnikov v digitalno okolje strategija, ki bi predvidela predvsem naslednje:
The rapporteur believes that an important step towards improving consumer confidence in the digital environment is to adopt a strategy containing in particular the following conditions:
- vzpostavitev poslovnega okolja, naklonjenega čezmejnemu e-trgovanju,
- the creation of an attractive business environment for cross-border e-commerce,
- oblikovanje evropskih standardov, ki bodo izboljšali kulturo e-poslovanja,
- the creation of European standards enhancing e-commerce culture,
- jasno opredelitev pravic in obveznosti potrošnikov in podjetij v digitalnem okolju,
- clarification of the rights and obligations of consumers and businesses in the digital environment,
- ustavitev drobljenja digitalnega notranjega trga,
- halting the fragmentation of the internal market in the digital environment,
- izboljšanje pravnega varstva potrošnikov v digitalnem okolju in izvršljivosti zakonodaje na tem področju.
- strengthening, and improving the enforceability of, the legal protection of consumers in the digital environment.
V neposredni povezavi s tem poročevalka meni, da bi bilo treba nadaljevati že začete dejavnosti, torej bi morala Komisija znova predstaviti in posodobiti pobudo za e-zaupanje, ki jo je predlagala v obliki delovnega dokumenta, pri tem pa upoštevati zgornja priporočila.
In direct connection with this, the rapporteur considers it appropriate to continue the activities already drawn up, and the Commission should therefore relaunch, and modernise in the way set out above, the e-confidence initiative proposed in the form of a Commission staff document.
Evropski parlament vztraja – kot je zapisal tudi v zgornji resoluciji – da je sedanja opredelitev pojma „potrošnik“ preozka glede na naraščajoče potrebe informacijske družbe, ki mala podjetja (z enim samim zaposlenim) pri čezmejnem trgovanju postavlja v enak položaj kot običajne potrošnike, vendar brez primerljive zaščite (garancijska obdobja, pravica do odstopa itd.).
In line with its resolutions referred to above, the European Parliament maintains that the current definition of ‘consumer’ is too narrow, given the growing needs of the information society, which puts small businesses (of one person) in the same position as consumers in cross‑border trade but without comparable protection (guarantee periods, right of withdrawal etc.).
Digitalno okolje prerašča meje držav in celin, zato je treba nujno izboljšati tudi zaščito evropskih potrošnikov pri elektronskih nakupih v tretjih državah.
The digital environment transcends national and continental borders, and it is therefore also crucial to improve the level of protection afforded to European consumers when making electronic purchases in third countries.
Poročevalka meni, da se je treba dogovoriti o sklenitvi sporazumov o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov z državami zunaj EU (zlasti članicami OECD in evropskimi sosedami).
Therefore, the rapporteur is of the opinion that it is necessary to agree on the conclusion of consumer protection cooperation agreements with countries outside the EU (particularly those within the OECD and countries geographically close to Europe).
Ta poziv k pripravi nove, občutno razširjene pobude za e-zaupanje, s katero bi povečali zaupanje potrošnikov v digitalno okolje, je priložnost za vključitev najrazličnejših ukrepov (zlasti nezakonodajnih, na primer financiranja izobraževalnih in informacijskih akcij za ciljne skupine, v katerih bi sodelovale potrošniške organizacije), pa tudi za večjo usklajenost posameznih dejavnosti Komisije in držav članic (na primer povečanje moči evropskih centrov za potrošnike, da bodo učinkovitejši v digitalnem okolju, in oblikovanje vseevropskih strokovnih forumov za izmenjavo izkušenj).
This call to work on a new and considerably broader e-confidence initiative with a view to increasing consumer confidence in the digital environment provides the opportunity to include a range of measures (particularly non-legislative measures, such as financing targeted educational and information campaigns involving consumer organisations), as well as greater coordination of individual activities by the Commission and the Member States (e.g. increasing the powers of European Consumer Centres to increase their effectiveness in the digital environment and creating pan-European expert forums for the exchange of best national practice).
Najbolj pa si je treba prizadevati za to, da bodo lahko zainteresirane strani (predstavniki industrije, potrošniških organizacij in drugi) izrazile svoje mnenje o prihodnjih ukrepih na tem dinamičnem področju in da bodo ti ukrepi podprti z nezavezujočimi akti (npr. samoregulativni kodeksi, predlog Komisije o standardih za boljšo kulturo e-poslovanja v EU).
However, the emphasis must be placed on ensuring that interested parties (industry representatives, consumer organisations, and suchlike) are consulted on future measures in this dynamic area and that such measures are supported also by ‘soft law’ measures (e.g. self‑regulatory codices and the proposal of standards by the Commission for a greater e‑commerce culture within the EU).
Ker raziskave in statistični podatki kažejo, da so internetne prevare (npr. kraja gesel in drugih osebnih podatkov) trenutno največja grožnja (večja kot neželena reklamna e-pošta), bi bilo treba vzpostaviti evropski sistem za zgodnje opozarjanje in boj proti goljufijam v digitalnem okolju, ki bi obsegal tudi podatkovno zbirko.
As studies and statistics show that fraudulent activities on the internet (e.g. ‘phishing’) are currently the greatest threat (greater than unsolicited commercial messages – ‘spam’), a European early-warning system (including database) should be set up to combat fraudulent activities in the digital environment.
Večje zaupanje potrošnikov v digitalno okolje bi bilo prav tako mogoče vzbuditi s hitrim in primernim reševanjem zahtevkov, pritožb in sporov, kar bi bilo mogoče doseči s spletnimi sistemi za alternativno reševanje sporov.
Greater consumer confidence in the digital environment can also be achieved by prompt and proper resolution of claims, complaints and disputes, which can best be achieved by online alternative dispute resolution systems.
Komisija bi morala poskrbeti za to, da nova pobuda za e-zaupanje ne bo omejena na zaščito potrošnikov, temveč bo začrtala usklajen pristop k digitalnemu okolju v celoti, vključno z analizami netržnih dejavnikov.
The Commission should also ensure that the new e-confidence initiative is not limited only to consumer protection but that it also sets out a coordinated approach for the whole issue of the digital environment (including analyses of non-market factors).
Ker ne potrošniki ne podjetniki večinoma niso pravni oziroma tehnični strokovnjaki, bi morala Komisija podpreti pripravo standardiziranih pogodb za e-poslovanje, kar bi obema strankama zagotovilo poštene pogoje.
As most consumers and business operators are not legal and technical experts, the Commission should support the creation of standardised e-commerce contracts, which would guarantee a fair approach for both parties.
Ker ne obstaja poseben znak zaupanja za čezmejne elektronske transakcije, poročevalka priporoča uvedbo evropskega znaka zaupanja, ki bi seveda zahteval izpolnjevanje različnih pogojev, na primer da stroški nastanejo le v primeru spora (ta znak bi bilo mogoče pridobiti in uporabljati brezplačno).
As there is no specialised trustmark for cross-border electronic transactions, the rapporteur recommends the introduction of a European trustmark system (which would, of course, require the fulfilment of a range of conditions, including costs being borne only in the event of the dispute (i.e. the European trustmark would be obtained and operated free of charge)).
Njegov namen bi bil med drugim tolikšno povečanje števila zadovoljnih strank, da bi se čezmejno e-poslovanje lahko razmahnilo.
The objective of the European trustmark, among other measures, is to reach the critical mass of satisfied customers required for cross-border e-commerce to work.
Drugo pomembno orodje za povečanje zaupanja strank v digitalno okolje bi bilo po mnenju poročevalke oblikovanje evropske listine pravic uporabnikov v informacijski družbi, ki bi jasno opredelila sedanje pravice in obveznosti vseh udeležencev, vključno s potrošniki, pa tudi uvedla nove (npr. pravice uporabnikov v povezavi z digitalno vsebino, tj. jasna opredelitev teh pravic pri uporabi intelektualne lastnine, pravica do osnovnih standardov medopravilnosti, pravice najbolj prikrajšanih uporabnikov, tj. boljša dostopnost spletnih strani za invalide).
Another important tool for increasing consumer confidence in the digital environment will, in the view of the rapporteur, be provided by the creation of a European charter of users’ rights in the information society that would clarify not only the current rights and obligations of information society actors, including consumers, but would also put forward new European rights and obligations (e.g. users’ rights relating to digital content, i.e. clarification of users’ rights when using intellectual property, users’ rights guaranteeing basic interoperability standards, and the rights of particularly vulnerable users, i.e. improving accessibility of internet pages for handicapped persons).
Poročevalka opozarja na vse večjo razdrobljenost digitalnega notranjega trga (tj. nedostopnost blaga, storitev in vsebine onkraj državnih meja), zaradi česar so občutno prikrajšani zlasti potrošniki v novih in manjših državah članicah, in sicer samo zaradi narodnosti, prebivališča oziroma dejstva, da je bila njihova plačilna kartica izdana v določeni državi članici.
The rapporteur warns of the increasing fragmentation of the internal market in the digital environment (i.e. the refusal of access to goods, services and content provided in a cross‑border context), which significantly affects consumers particularly from new and small Member States solely on the basis of their nationality, place of residence and whether they own a payment card issued in a certain Member State.
Meni, da se je treba s takšnimi pojavi učinkovito spopasti.
It is the rapporteur’s view that such conduct needs to be confronted effectively.
Jasnejši in preglednejši pravni red na področju varstva potrošnikov v digitalnem okolju, zlasti če bi se osredotočil na horizontalne pravne instrumente in revizijo potrošniškega pogodbenega prava, bi gotovo prispeval k večjemu zaupanju potrošnikov.
A clearer and more transparent acquis communautaire in the area of consumer protection in the digital environment, particularly if it is oriented towards horizontal legal measures and a revision of consumer contract law, can contribute towards higher consumer confidence.
Po mnenju poročevalke je treba odpraviti pomanjkljivosti tega reda vsaj na naslednjih področjih: za licenčne pogodbe za končnega uporabnika in „tehnične pogodbene pogoje“ bi morala veljati pravila o nepoštenih pogodbenih pogojih; za pogodbe, sklenjene med potrošniki in poklicnimi trgovci na dražbenih spletnih mestih, ter pogodbe za turistične storitve (letalske vozovnice, bivanje v hotelih, najem avtomobilov, storitve za prosti čas itd.), ki jih sklenejo posamezniki prek interneta, bi morala veljati pravila o prodaji na daljavo; informacije, ki jih mora prodajalec posredovati kupcu ob elektronski prodaji, je treba poenostaviti in standardizirati; preglednost dobavne verige v digitalnem okolju je treba povečati, da bo potrošnik poznal dejansko identiteto dobavitelja (tudi to, ali gre za končnega dobavitelja ali posrednika); uvesti je treba učinkovito orodje za zaščito potrošnikov za primere, ko ti v celoti prevzamejo pogodbena tveganja, vključno s finančnim (tj. ko morajo plačati vnaprej), zlasti pri čezmejnem e-poslovanju.
In the rapporteur’s view, current shortcomings in the consumer acquis must be resolved at least in the following areas: end-user licence agreements and ‘technical contract terms’ should be subject to the rules on unfair contract terms; contracts concluded between consumers and professional traders in online auction sales, as well as contracts for tourists services (airline tickets, hotel accommodation, car rental, leisure time services etc.) ordered individually over the internet, should be subject to the rules on distance selling; the information that the vendor must provide to the purchaser in an electronic transaction should be simplified and standardised; the transparency of the supply chain in the digital environment on the vendor’s side should be increased to ensure that the consumer knows the actual identity of the supplier (including whether it is an intermediary or an end supplier); an effective consumer protection tool should be created for cases where the consumer assumes all contractual risks (including financial risks, e.g. when there is a requirement to pay in advance), particularly in the context of cross-border e-commerce.
o zaupanju potrošnikov v digitalno okolje
on Consumer confidence in the digital environment
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. poudarja, da potrošniki niso le posamezniki, ampak tudi mala in srednja podjetja; vendar ugotavlja, da so tehnične težave poslovanja prek platform na spletu, negotovo poreklo blaga in nezakonito ravnanje določenih akterjev le nekateri od dejavnikov, ki lahko ustvarijo nezaupanje; zato meni, da bi morali spodbujati zaupanje in potrošnikom zagotoviti, da lahko transakcije opravljajo varno ter na pregleden in pošten način;
Emphasises that it is not only individuals that are consumers but also SMEs; notes, however, that the technical problems of trading through online platforms, the uncertain origin of goods and the illegal behaviour of certain players might be some of the factors creating mistrust; considers, to this end, that trust and confidence should be promoted and consumers reassured that transactions can be safely completed in a transparent and fair manner;
Euro-Label); vendar opozarja, da pogosto ravno v novih državah članicah ni na voljo dovolj sredstev za uvedbo tovrstnih sistemov; posebej za mala in srednja podjetja je to dobra možnost, da pridobijo zaupanje in izboljšajo svoj položaj v primerjavi z velikimi platformami na spletu in spletnimi trgovinami, ki so v oglaševanju bolj zastopane;
Welcomes initiatives to promote trust and confidence in e-commerce and draws attention to existing quality marks (such as the Euro-Label); points out, however, that it is often precisely in the new Member States that funding for introducing these schemes is lacking; considers that, especially for small businesses, quality labels are an important way of creating confidence and offsetting the disadvantage of a lower marketing profile compared with online outlets and Web-shops;
6. poudarja, da je digitalni trg z ustvarjalno vsebino še vedno na začetni stopnji razvoja, samoregulativni kodeks pa bi lahko odigral pomembno vlogo.
Stresses that the market for digital creative content is still at an early stage of development and that self-regulatory codes could play an important role.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta in Komisije o sklenitvi Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Rusko federacijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council and Commission decision on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Russian Federation, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0138 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0138 ),
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ES in zlasti člena 44(2), zadnjega stavka člena 47(2), člena 55, člena 57(2), člena 71, člena 80(2) ter členov 93, 94, 133 in 181a v povezavi z drugim stavkom člena 300(2),
– having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 44(2), the last sentence of Article 47(2), and Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133 and 181a, in conjunction with the second sentence of Article 300(2),
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ESAE in zlasti drugega odstavka člena 101,
– having regard to the EAEC Treaty, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0125/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0125/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6‑0192/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0192/2007 ),
Sklenitev Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Rusko federacijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
Conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Russia to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
o oblikovanju evropske politike na širokopasovnem področju
on Building a European Policy on Broadband
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA............................................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION......................................................3
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov .................................20
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 20
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj .........................................................................23
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development .........................................24
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ..................................................................................28
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs .............................................................29
o oblikovanju evropske politike na širokopasovnem področju
on Building a European Policy in Broadband
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom Premoščanje širokopasovne vrzeli ( KOM(2006)0129 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Bridging the Broadband Gap’ ( COM(2006)0129 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Foruma o digitalnem razkoraku z dne 15. julija 2005 o širokopasovnem dostopu in javni podpori na nezadostno preskrbljenih območjih,
– having regard to the Digital Divide Forum Report of 15 July 2005 on broadband access and public support in under-served areas,
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije za spomladansko zasedanje Evropskega sveta z naslovom Izvajanje prenovljene lizbonske strategije za rast in delovna mesta ( KOM(2006)0816 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Spring European Council entitled ‘Implementing the Renewed Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs’ ( COM(2006)0816 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom Priklop Evrope na visoko hitrost: najnovejši dogodki v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij ( KOM(2004)0061 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Connecting Europe at high speed: recent developments in the sector of electronic communications’ ( COM(2004)0061 ),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (okvirna direktiva)
– having regard to Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom i2010 – Evropska informacijska družba za rast in zaposlovanje ( KOM(2005)0229 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘i2010 – A European Information Society for growth and employment’ ( COM(2005)0229 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom i2010 – prvo letno poročilo o evropski informacijski družbi ( KOM(2006)0215 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘i2010 – First Annual Report on the European Information Society’ ( COM(2006)0215 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z naslovom Smernice o kriterijih in načinih izvajanja strukturnih skladov za podporo elektronskim komunikacijam ( SEC(2003)0895 ),
– having regard to the Commission Staff Working Paper entitled ‘Guidelines on Criteria and Modalities of Implementation of Structural Funds in Support of Electronics Communications’ ( SEC(2003)0895 ),