natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Snovi z določenim razvrščanjem
Substances with certain classifications
Snovi, ki izpolnjujejo merila za razvrščanje, določena v Direktivi 1967/548/EGS, za naslednje kategorije:
Substances that fulfil the criteria for classification set out in Directive 1967/548/EEC for the following categories:
a) snovi, ki so rakotvorne, mutagene ali strupene za razmnoževanje skupine 3
a) c arcinogenic, mutagenic and toxic to reproduction in category 3
b) snovi s kronično toksičnostjo (R48)
b) s ubstances with chronic toxicity (R48)
c) okolju nevarne snovi z možnimi dolgotrajnimi posledicami (R50-53)
c) e nvironmentally hazardous substances with possible long term effect (R50-53)
d) snovi, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč (R59)
d) o zone depleting substances (R59)
e)snovi, katerih vdihavanje lahko povzroči preobčutljivost (R42)
e) s ubstances which may cause sensitization by inhalation (R42)
f) snovi, pri katerih lahko pri stiku s kožo nastane preobčutljivost (R43)
f) s ubstances which may cause sensitization by skin contact (R43)
Prednostne nevarne snovi
Priority Hazardous Substances
Prednostne nevarne snovi iz Priloge X k Direktivi 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (okvirna direktiva o vodah)
Priority hazardous substances as listed in Annex X to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy 3 (Water Framework Directive)
2 Posebna angleška izdaja:: serija I, poglavje 1967, str.
2 English special edition: Series I Chapter 1967 p .
3 UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str.
3 OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
Priloga se nanaša na obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti v zvezi z nevarnimi snovmi.
This Annex refers to the existing Community legislation regarding dangerous substances.
Priloga bo morda spremenjena v skladu s členom 50.
The Annex might be amended according to the article 50.
Skupina strokovnjakov za nevarne snovi, ki je povezana z delom TC 351, bi morala imeti pomembno vlogo pri spreminjanju priloge.
The expert group for dangerous substances related to the work of TC 351 should have an important role when amending this Annex
Priloga V – del 1 – točka 1.1 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V - Part 1 - point 1.1 - introductory wording
Sistem 1 – Izjava proizvajalca o zmogljivosti za bistvene značilnosti proizvoda na podlagi naslednjih postavk:
System 1 - Declaration of the performance for the essential characteristics of the product by the manufacturer on the basis of following items:
Sistem 1+ – Izjava proizvajalca o zmogljivosti za bistvene značilnosti proizvoda na podlagi naslednjih postavk:
performance for the essential characteristics of the product by the manufacturer on the basis of following items:
Dejstvo, da je sedaj predlagano številčenje od 1 do 5, bo vneslo zmedo.
The fact that the numbering is now proposed to go from 1-5 will cause confusion.
Številnim industrijskim sektorjem bo naložena nezanemarljiva obveznost, da spremenijo vso upravno dokumentacijo, ki se že izvaja v podjetjih, ter uradno dokumentacijo.
It will place a significant obligation on many industry sectors to change all the administrative documentation currently implemented within companies as well as official documents.
Priloga V – del 1 – točka 1.2 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V - Part 1 - point 1.2 - introductory wording
Sistem 2 – Izjava proizvajalca o zmogljivosti za bistvene značilnosti proizvoda na podlagi naslednjih postavk:
System 2 - Declaration of the performance for the essential characteristics of the product by the manufacturer on the basis of following items:
Priloga V – del 1 – točka 1.3 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V - Part 1 - point 1.3 - introductory wording
Sistem 3 – Izjava proizvajalca o zmogljivosti za bistvene značilnosti proizvoda na podlagi naslednjih postavk:
System 3 - Declaration of the performance for the essential characteristics of the product by the manufacturer on the basis of following items:
Sistem 2+ – Izjava proizvajalca o zmogljivosti za bistvene značilnosti proizvoda na podlagi naslednjih postavk:
System 2+ - Declaration of the performance for the essential characteristics of the product by the manufacturer on the basis of following items:
Priloga V – del 1 – točka 1.4 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V - Part 1 - point 1.4 - introductory wording
Sistem 4 – Izjava proizvajalca o zmogljivosti za bistvene značilnosti proizvoda na podlagi naslednjih postavk:
System 4 - Declaration of the performance for the essential characteristics of the product by the manufacturer on the basis of following items:
Priloga V – del 1 – točka 1.5 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V - Part 1 - point 1.5 - introductory wording
Sistem 5 – Izjava proizvajalca o zmogljivosti za bistvene značilnosti proizvoda na podlagi naslednjih postavk:
System 5 - Declaration of the performance for the essential characteristics of the product by the manufacturer on the basis of following items:
Za spodbujanje boljšega prometa/uporabe gradbenih proizvodov Komisija predlaga zamenjavo direktive o gradbenih proizvodih (89/106/EGS) z novo uredbo, ki bo določila usklajene pogoje za trženje gradbenih proizvodov.
To promote the movement/use of construction products, the Commission is proposing to replace the Construction Products Directive (89/106/EEC) with a new regulation laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products (CPR).
Uredba za trženje gradbenih proizvodov si prizadeva predlagati skupen tehnični jezik ter pojasniti pogoje pridobitve znaka CE.
The CPR seeks to propose a common technical language and to clarify the conditions of access to the CE marking.
1.1 – Narava znaka CE
1.1 – Nature of the CE marking
Izjava o zmogljivosti je element, ki omogoča uporabo znaka CE.
The declaration of performance is the element enabling the CE marking to be used.
Izjavo oblikuje proizvajalec, ki je odgovoren za navedene informacije.
It is drawn up by the manufacturer, who is responsible for the information provided.
Oblasti predpostavljajo, da je izjava točna.
The authorities assume that the declaration is accurate.
Izjava vsebuje informacije o zmogljivosti proizvoda, saj se ti podatki od sedaj naprej ne pojavljajo več na samem proizvodu zavoljo lažjega označevanja.
It contains details of the performance of the product, details which thereafter do not appear on the product itself, to simplify the labelling.
Uredba o določitvi usklajenih pogojev za trženje gradbenih proizvodov se razlikuje od novega zakonodajnega okvira („blagovnega svežnja“), saj postavlja znak CE kot edini znak zmogljivosti proizvodov ter odpravlja vse ostale nacionalne znake.
The CPR differs from the NLF (the ‘goods package’) in that it sets the CE marking as the sole marking for the performance of products and replaces any other national marking.
Proizvajalci imajo pooblastilo za uporabo znakov kakovosti, ki pravno niso zavezujoči.
Manufacturers will be authorised to use legally non-binding quality labels.
Če v kraju dajanja proizvoda v promet ne bodo veljale nobene bistvene zahteve, znak CE ne bo več obvezen, tudi če je proizvod zajet v usklajeni tehnični specifikaciji.
In the absence of essential requirements applying where the product is to be placed on the market, the CE marking will no longer be obligatory even if the product is covered by a harmonised technical specification.
1.2 – Postopek, ki vodi k znaku CE
1.2 – Procedure leading to the CE marking
1.2.1 – Dve obliki dostopa
1.2.1 – Two access routes
Komisijski predlog razlikuje dva postopka, med katerima lahko proizvajalec izbira:
The Commission proposal distinguishes between two procedures which manufacturers can choose from:
(a) glavni postopek temelji na usklajenih standardih.
(a) The main procedure based on harmonised standards.
Kadar proizvajalec meni, da njegov proizvod sodi v okvir obstoječega standarda, da oceniti njegove zmogljivosti prek organov, ki so jih priglasile države članice, v skladu s primernim testnim sistemom.
Where a manufacturer believes that a product is covered by an existing standard, he has its performance assessed by bodies notified by the Member States in accordance with the appropriate test system.
(b) Evropska tehnična ocena (ETO) ponuja vzporedno pot.
(b) European technical assessment (ETA) provides a parallel route.
Proizvajalcu omogoča, da zahteva novo usklajeno tehnično specifikacijo, ki je prilagojena njegovemu proizvodu, prek oblikovanja evropskega ocenjevalnega lista (EOL), ki ima podobno funkcijo kot usklajeni standardi.
It enables a manufacturer to call for a new harmonised technical specification suitable for his product to be created through the production of a European assessment document (EAD), whose function is comparable to that of the harmonised standards.
Evropski ocenjevalni list in evropsko tehnično oceno oblikujejo tehnični organi za ugotavljanje skladnosti (TAB) na zahtevo proizvajalca.
EADs and ETEs are drawn up by the technical assessment bodies (TABs) at the manufacturer’s request.
1.2.2 – Usklajeni standardi: poenostavljeni ocenjevalni postopek
1.2.2 – Harmonised standards: simplified assessment procedure
Komisija je za omejitev stroškov predlagala alternativno pot za ocenjevanje zmogljivosti proizvodov: mikro podjetja bodo lahko zamenjala klasični sistem ocenjevanja z uporabo posebne tehnične dokumentacije, v kateri proizvajalec dokaže, da njegov proizvod sodi v okvir veljavnih predpisov in da izpolnjuje njihove zahteve.
In order to limit the costs, the Commission is proposing an alternative route to assess the performance of products: micro-enterprises will be able replace the conventional assessment system with a specific technical documentation (STD), in which the manufacturer demonstrates that his product is covered and meets the requirements of existing rules.
Testiranja pa bodo lahko postala obvezna, če bo Komisija menila, da je to potrebno zaradi varnostnih razlogov.
Tests may, however, be required where the Commission believes them to be necessary for reasons of security.
Postopek, za katerega se uporablja posebna tehnična dokumentacija, bo moral med drugim omogočiti delitev rezultatov izvedenih preskusov na proizvodih, za katere se meni, da so enakovredni, in uporabo tipskega preskušanja.
The procedure using the STD should also make it possible to share the results of tests carried out on products considered as being equivalent and to use ‘cascading type testing’.
Posebna tehnična dokumentacija bo na razpolago tudi proizvodom, proizvedenim v neindustrijskem proizvodnem procesu.
The STD will also be open to non-industrially manufactured products.
Predlogi poročevalke
The rapporteur’s suggestions
Poročevalka pozdravlja pobudo Komisije, ki si prizadeva za lažje dajanje v promet in trgovanje z gradbenimi proizvodi v EU.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s initiative, the aim of which is to make it easier to place on the market and to trade in construction products in the European Union.
Vzpostavitev skupnega jezika in čim večja prilagodljivost, kar zadeva dostop do znaka CE (predvsem prek poenostavljenih postopkov za mikro podjetja), bosta prispevali k izboljšanju regulativnega okvira gradbene panoge.
The establishment of a common language and improved flexibility regarding access to the CE marking (in particular, via simplified procedures for micro-enterprises) will help to improve the regulatory framework for the construction industry.
Poročevalka vseeno meni, da je potrebno natančno opredeliti in pojasniti kar nekaj točk, da bi lahko zagotovili večjo verodostojnost znaka CE in boljšo preglednost sistema za uporabnike gradbenih proizvodov.
Nevertheless, the rapporteur considers that precision and clarification is needed on a number of points in order to ensure that the CE marking is credible and to make the system more transparent for users of construction products.
2.1 – Dve različni poti dostopa do znaka CE
2.1 – Two separate access routes to the CE marking
Možnost prostega dostopa do ETO za vse gradbene proizvode, ki jo je ponudila Komisija, je tvegana, saj lahko povzroči uvedbo potrjevanja dveh hitrosti z različnimi merili kakovosti, v kolikor se postopki ocenjevanja zmogljivosti razlikujejo glede na izbrani postopek pridobitve znaka CE.
The possibility offered by the Commission of leaving access to the ETA free to all construction products carries the risk of establishing a two-speed certification procedure, with variable gauges of quality, to the extent that procedures for assessing performance differ depending on the route to CE marking.
Zato je bil sprejet sklep za ohranitev možnosti uporabe ETO za inovativne proizvode (člen 21), ki pa so sedaj natančno opredeljeni (člen 2(1a)).
That is why the choice was made to reserve the possibility of using the ETA for innovative products (Article 21), which are now defined more precisely (Article 2(1)(a)).
2.2 – Poenostavljeni postopki
2.2 – Simplified procedures
Potreba po nadzoru trga pomeni strožji nadzor proizvodov, proizvedenih zunaj Evropske unije.
The need for market surveillance means there must be stricter control of products manufactured outside the European Union.
Kar zadeva uvoz, predstavlja možnost izogiba standardnim postopkom ocenjevanja zmogljivosti, ki jo ponuja posebna tehnična dokumentacija, realno tveganje, da bo tako ustvarjena zakonska luknja, ki bo proizvodom dvomljive zmogljivosti omogočala vstop na evropski trg brez dejanske možnosti nadzora.
Applied to imports, the possibility offered by the STD of derogating from standard procedures for assessing performance entails a real risk of creating a loophole allowing products of questionable performance to enter the European market without any real opportunity for control.
V tem smislu ni mogoče izključiti možnosti ustanavljanja navideznih mikro podjetij, katerih naloga bi bila olajšati uvoz nepreskušenih proizvodov.
In this regard, the possibility of fictitious micro-enterprises being set up to facilitate imports of non-tested products cannot be excluded.
Poročevalka predlaga, naj se postopek s posebno tehnično dokumentacijo sicer ohrani, vendar pa naj ne bo na voljo uvoznikom, ki morajo uporabljati konvencionalno pot ocenjevanja (člena 26(3) in 27(3)).
Therefore the rapporteur suggests that, while the STD procedure should be maintained, it should not be made available to importers, who should be required to follow the conventional assessment route (Articles 26(3) and 27(3)).
Na drugi strani bi bilo za zagotovitev verodostojnosti znaka CE, dodeljenega proizvodu v primeru uporabe poenostavljenega postopka, dobro povečati število primerov, za katere bo posebno tehnično dokumentacijo preverjala tretja stran (člena 26(2) in 27(2)).
In addition, in order to ensure the credibility of the CE marking affixed to a product where simplified procedures are used, the number of cases in which the STD is verified by a third party (Articles 26(2)and 27(2)) should be extended.
Dobro delovanje sistema predpostavlja določeno mero preglednosti, kar zadeva določanje usklajenih tehničnih specifikacij in ocenjevanje zmogljivosti proizvodov, ki se potegujejo za pridobitev znaka CE.
For the system to function smoothly there has to be a certain degree of transparency as regards the establishment of harmonised technical specifications and the assessment of the performances of products for which the CE marking is sought.
Postopek za pripravo ETO za inovativne proizvode mora biti ne samo zaupen, temveč tudi jasen za proizvajalca.
The procedure leading to the establishment of an ETA for innovative products must be not only confidential but also transparent vis-à-vis the manufacturer.
Ta mora predvsem imeti možnost, da je ustrezno obveščen o poteku obravnave svoje vloge, ter možnost, da dopolni dokumentacijo za vlogo prek zaslišanja neodvisnega znanstvenega strokovnjaka in panožne organizacije po svoji izbiri (Priloga II, točki 2.5 in 2.7).
It must be possible for the manufacturer to be informed about the progress of his application and to add to his file on the basis of a hearing with an independent scientific expert and a professional organisation of his choice (Annex II, points 2.5 and 2.7).
Glede upravljanja poročevalka predlaga tudi, da ima vsak TAB, ki sodeluje v postopku sprejemanja odločitev, enak status v organizaciji TAB (člen 25(2)).
In terms of governance, the rapporteur also proposes that each TAB participating in the decision-making procedure should have the same status within the OTAB (Article 25(2)).
Predlaga tudi, da se gre izogniti nesorazmernemu zastopstvu določenih kategorij proizvajalcev v evropskih organih za standardizacijo, da bi zagotovili preglednost sprejemanja odločitev in zaščito MSP (člen 16(1)).
In addition, he suggests that over-representation of particular categories of manufacturer within European standardisation bodies should be avoided so as to ensure that decision-making is transparent and that SMEs are protected (Article 16(1)).
2.4 - Pogoji, povezani z znakom CE
2.4 - Conditions associated with the CE marking
Bistveno je, da imajo vsi proizvodi, ki so v prometu na trgu Skupnosti in ki so zajeti v usklajeni tehnični specifikaciji (usklajen standard ali ETO), znak CE (člen 7(1)).
It is essential that any product placed on the Community market and covered by a harmonised technical specification (harmonised standard or ETA) has the CE marking (Article 7(1)).
Ta znak ustreza izjavi proizvajalca o zmogljivosti proizvoda, v skladu z nizom bistvenih značilnosti.
That marking corresponds to the manufacturer’s declaration concerning the performance of the product, in accordance with a set of essential characteristics.
Kjer te bistvene značilnosti obstajajo, so trenutno izključno nacionalnega značaja in pričajo o (npr. podnebnih) razlikah, ki obstajajo med državami članicami.
Where such essential characteristics exist, they are currently exclusively national and reflect the differences (e.g. climatic) between the Member States.
Če država članica, v kateri je proizvod dan v promet, ni določila ustreznih bistvenih zahtev, se znak CE ne bo navezoval na noben oprijemljiv element v smislu zmogljivostnih vrednosti.
If the Member State where a product is placed on the market has not laid down appropriate essential requirements, the CE marking will not be linked to any tangible element in terms of performance values.
To bi precej omejilo verodostojnost znaka CE.
This would significantly affect the credibility of the CE marking.
Kot odgovor na ta problem poročevalka predlaga razlikovanje med dvema vrstama bistvenih značilnosti (člena 2(2) in 2(4)):
To address this problem, the rapporteur suggests differentiating two types of essential characteristics (Articles 2(2) and 4(2)):
– „bistvene evropske značilnosti“ , ki morajo odražati poudarke, skupne vsem državam članicam Unije in njihovim državljanom, in ki bodo deležne minimalne uskladitve v okviru komitologije.
– ‘ Essential European characteristics ’ , which must reflect considerations common to all Member States of the EU and its citizens, and will be the fruit of minimum harmonisation through the committee procedure.
Zmogljivost proizvoda, za katerega velja usklajena tehnična specifikacija, bo morala biti nujno ocenjena na podlagi teh „bistvenih evropskih zahtev“.
The performance of a product covered by a harmonised technical specification will have to be assessed on the basis of these ‘essential European requirements’.
Te bodo zadevale zlasti zahteve glede varnosti, segrevanja podnebja ter kakovosti zraka v zaprtih prostorih (člen 4(3)); seznam pa nikakor ni izčrpen in se lahko spremeni;
They will refer, in particular, to requirements relating to security, global warming and the quality of indoor air (Article 4(3)); the list is not, however, exhaustive and may be revised.
– „bistvene ozemeljske značilnosti “ , ki jih opredelijo države članice in ki so v skladu z opredelitvijo, ki jo trenutno vsebuje osnutek Komisije.
– ‘ Essential territorial characteristics ’, defined by the Member States and corresponding to the definition currently contained in the Commission draft.
Če te značilnosti veljajo v kraju, kjer namerava proizvajalec dati proizvod v promet, bodo omogočile dodatne ocene zmogljivosti proizvoda.
Where they exist in the place where the manufacturer intends to place his product on the market, they will provide additional elements for assessing the product’s performance.
Z uvedbo „bistvenih evropskih značilnosti“ želi poročevalka okrepiti verodostojnost znaka CE in mu zagotoviti enak pomen po vsej Evropi, glede na določena jasno opredeljena merila.
By introducing ‘essential European characteristics’ the rapporteur is seeking to reinforce the credibility of the CE marking by giving it the same meaning throughout the EU, in accordance with certain clearly defined elements.
2.5 - Varstvo potrošnikov/poklicnih uporabnikov
2.5 - Protection of professional consumers/users
Izjava o zmogljivosti – Izjava o zmogljivosti mora omenjati predvideno uporabo proizvoda ter testni sistem, ki je bil uporabljen za oceno, da je pomen navedenih zmogljivosti jasen in da imajo potrošniki zanesljive informacije (člena 5(2) in 19(3) ter Priloga III).
Declaration of performance – In order to clarify the meaning of declared performances and to ensure that consumers are properly informed, it is important that the declaration of performance refers to the envisaged use of the product and the test system used for the assessment (Articles 5(2) and 19(3) and Annex III).
Znak CE/nacionalni znaki – V pričakovanju pobude Komisije, ki bo dovoljeval okrepitev znaka CE, je treba ohraniti sporazumno besedilo o nacionalnih znakih, ki sta ga odobrila Evropski parlament in Svet v „blagovnem svežnju“ (uvodna izjava 30 in člen 7(2)).
CE marking/national markings – Pending an initiative from the Commission to reinforce the CE marking, the compromise formula on national markings approved by Parliament and the Council in the ‘goods package’ should be maintained (Recital 30 and Article 7(2)).
Jezik dokumentov – Uporabniki gradbenih proizvodov morajo imeti na voljo izjavo o zmogljivosti v jeziku, ki ga razumejo (člena 6(4) in 13(2)).
Document language – The users of construction products must be able to have a declaration of performance in a language they understand (Articles 6(4) and 13(2)).
Kontaktne točke za proizvode – Komisija predlaga vzpostavitev kontaktnih točk za proizvode, ki bodo podjetjem nudile informacije o nacionalnih tehničnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za vgradnjo, sestavljanje ali montažo posebnega tipa gradbenega proizvoda.
Product Contact Points – The Commission is proposing to establish Product Contact Points to provide firms with information on the national technical rules applicable to the incorporation, assembling or installation of a specific type of construction product.
Podane informacije morajo zadevati tudi možnosti pritožbe, ki so na voljo proizvajalcem v primeru spodbijanja sklepov, sprejetih v postopku pridobitve znaka CE.
It is important that the information provided should also include the possibilities for appeal available to manufacturers should they wish to contest decisions taken during the procedure for accessing the CE marking.
Poleg tega morajo biti kontaktne točke za proizvode nujno neodvisne od vseh organov ali organizacij, ki sodelujejo pri postopku pridobivanja dostopa do znaka CE (člen 9).
Furthermore, it is essential that the Product Contact Points are independent of any body or organisation involved in the procedure for obtaining the CE marking (Article 9).
Posebni primeri: Gradbena podjetja ali delavci se pogosto znajdejo v situaciji, da morajo sami izdelati in vgraditi proizvode v objekt.
Specific cases : Works contractors and/or craftspeople are often required to manufacture products and incorporate them into a work themselves.
V teh posebnih primerih znak CE ne bi smel biti obvezen (člen 2(5)).
The CE marking should not be obligatory in these specific cases (Article 2(5)).
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi usklajenih pogojev za trženje gradbenih proizvodov
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of the construction products