natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glede na moje izkušnje in presojo lahko rečem, da že sedaj obstaja dialog med Evropskim parlamentom in še zlasti njegovim Odborom za proračunski nadzor ter Računskim sodiščem, ki je sistematičen, konstruktiven, spoštljiv do vlog in neodvisnosti udeležencev ter temelji na medsebojnem zaupanju in spoštovanju.
Based on my experience and judgement, I can say that a dialogue now exists between the European Parliament, in particular its Committee on Budgetary Control, and the Court of Auditors which is systematic, constructive, respectful of the roles and independence of the participants and founded on mutual trust and respect.
To zgledno sodelovanje pri prizadevanju za skupni cilj se kaže v naslednjih oblikah:
This exemplary close cooperation covers, in the interest of achieving the common goal, the following areas:
– Redni dialogi med člani Računskega sodišča in poslanci o vsebini in metodologiji letnega poročila, drugih poročil in mnenj;
– Regular dialogue between the members of the Court of Auditors and MEPs on the contents and methodology of the Annual Report, other reports and opinions;
– Pri pripravi letnega delovnega načrta Računsko sodišče zaprosi in upošteva mnenje Evropskega parlamenta (Odbora za proračunski nadzor) ter išče rešitve za nakazane težave.
- When the annual work plan is being drawn up, the Court of Auditors requests and considers the opinion of Parliament (the Committee on Budgetary Control) and seeks solutions to the problems raised.
To ne zajema samo časovnega okvira poročil in mnenj, temveč sega tudi do vprašanj glede metodologije in celo načina predstavitve;
This covers not only the timing of reports and opinions but also extends to issues of content and methodology and of presentation;
– Med načrtovanjem letnega delovnega načrta in posameznih revizij potekajo redni sestanki na skupinski in osebni ravni med poslanci in člani Računskega sodišča;
- During the planning of the annual work plan and individual audits, regular meetings take place on a group and individual level between MEPs and members of the Court of Auditors;
– Poročila in mnenja Računskega sodišča so ne samo podprta z ustreznimi, posodobljenimi, točnimi in statističnimi podatki, temveč vsebujejo tudi jasne sklepe, sporočila in priporočila, ki jih lahko Parlament in zlasti Odbor za proračunski nadzor pri svojem delu zelo uspešno uporabi.
- The reports and opinions of the Court of Auditors are not only supported by relevant, up-to-date, precise and statistical data but also contain clear conclusions, messages and recommendations which can be put to effective use by Parliament and in particular the Committee on Budgetary Control in its work.
Ponovno bi poudaril, da to tesno sodelovanje, ki temelji na medsebojnem zaupanju in spoštovanju, na noben način ne ogroža neodvisnosti udeležencev, temveč je njegov cilj omogočiti Parlamentu, da svojo vlogo zakonodajalca in nadzornika nad izvajanjem proračuna opravlja še učinkoviteje.
I would like to reiterate that this close cooperation, founded on mutual trust and respect, in no way jeopardises the independence of the participants; instead its aim is to enable Parliament to fulfil its role as legislator and budget implementation monitor even more effectively.
To je bil tudi namen parlamentarnih predstavitev in konferenc, ki jih je, z aktivno udeležbo Računskega sodišča in s sodelovanjem znanih mednarodnih strokovnjakov, organiziral Odbor za proračunski nadzor.
This is also the aim of the parliamentary hearings and conferences which have been organised by the Committee on Budgetary Control, with the active participation of the Court of Auditors and the involvement of well-known international experts.
Kot predsednik Odbora za proračunski nadzor sem lahko sodeloval pri pripravi in izvedbi osmih tovrstnih dogodkov, kar je prispevalo h krepitvi odnosov med Parlamentom in Računskim sodiščem.
As Chair of the Committee on Budgetary Control I was able to take part in preparing and chairing eight such events, thereby contributing to reinforcing the relationship between Parliament and the Court of Auditors.
Kot morebitni član Računskega sodišča bom naredil vse, kar je v moji moči, za nadaljnjo poglobitev tega sodelovanja in dialoga.
As a prospective member of the Court of Auditors I will do everything in my power to further deepen this cooperation and dialogue.
Eden od elementov dodane vrednosti revizije poslovanja je, da vrednoti regulativno okolje za nazaj.
One element of the added value of performance audit is that it assesses the regulatory environment in a retroactive way.
Primerna je za odkrivanje in objektivno ocenjevanje pomanjkljivosti v regulativnem sistemu, ki je trenutno v veljavi, oziroma za oblikovanje zanesljivih, objektivnih predlogov rešitev.
It is suitable for uncovering and objectively assessing deficiencies in the regulatory system currently in place and putting forward reliable, objective suggestions for solutions.
Ta vrsta revizije v bistvu ni nič drugega kot neodvisno strokovno mnenje za gospodarno, učinkovito in uspešno doseganje zastavljenih ciljev.
This kind of audit is basically nothing other than an independent expert opinion on the economical, effective and efficient attainment of the objectives set.
Razkriva dejavnike, ki ovirajo doseganje vidikov gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti, ki vplivajo na delovanje organizacije.
It uncovers the factors hindering the achievement of considerations of economy, effectiveness and efficiency which impact on the operation of an organisation.
Naloga spremljanja uspešnosti ni samo razkrivanje pomanjkljivosti, temveč tudi priprava posebnih priporočil za boljše in bolj učinkovito upravljanje s sredstvi EU.
The task of monitoring performance involves not only uncovering deficiencies but also drawing up specific recommendations on better, more effective management of EU funds.
Zato mora vsako poročilo, ki se pripravi na podlagi ocene poslovanja, poleg kritičnih opažanj vsebovati tudi priporočila za izboljšave.
Therefore, every report drawn up following a performance assessment must contain, in addition to critical observations, recommendations for improvements to be made.
Z izločanjem t.i. „slabega poslovanja“ ter v nadaljevanju s predstavitvijo primerov „najboljše prakse“ in dajanjem priporočil za izboljšave revizija poslovanja podpira oblikovalce odločitev in revidirane institucije pri izboljševanju njihovih dejavnosti.
By means of filtering out poor performance, presenting examples of best practice and giving recommendations for improvement, performance audit supports decision-makers and the institutions subjected to audit in improving their activities.
To je še posebej pomembno v tem obdobju krize, ko je javno mnenje osredotočeno na to, da se sredstva EU uporabljajo na način, ki ni samo zakonit in pravilen, ampak tudi uspešen in učinkovit.
This is even more important in the present crisis period, with public opinion focused on EU funds being used in a way that is not only lawful and regular but also effective and efficient.
Zato se mi zdi pomembno, da Parlament redno dobiva informacije ne le o kritičnih ugotovitvah in predlogih za izboljšave iz ocene uspešnosti, temveč tudi mnenja, reakcije in nadaljnje ukrepe Komisije in zadevnih držav članic.
This is why I would consider it important for Parliament to receive information not only on the critical findings and suggestions for improvement contained in the performance assessments but also the opinions, reactions and follow-up measures of the Commission and the relevant Member States with regard to implementing the recommendations.
To je zelo zapleteno vprašanje, ki je predmet številnih razprav in je bistvenega pomena ne samo za Parlament (in zlasti za Odbor za proračunski nadzor), temveč tudi za delovanje celotne EU, kot se kaže od znotraj in od zunaj.
This is an extremely complex question which is the subject of much debate, of great importance not just for Parliament (and in particular the Committee on Budgetary Control) but for the operation of the whole of the EU as seen from within and from outside.
Temu primerno so v preteklem obdobju – predvsem na pobudo Parlamenta (Odbora za proračunski nadzor) – ta vprašanja obravnavala številna delna zasedanja, predstavitve in delavnice.
Accordingly, it has recently been considered in a number of part-sessions, hearings and workshops at the instigation of Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control.
Po Pogodbi je za izvajanje proračuna Unije odgovorna Komisija, ki nalogo opravlja v sodelovanju z državami članicami.
According to the Treaty, the Commission is responsible for implementing the Union’s budget, a task it performs in part in cooperation with the Member States.
Spremljanje tega procesa in podelitev razrešnice v zvezi z izvrševanjem proračuna spadata med naloge Parlamenta.
The task of monitoring this process and granting discharge for the implementation of the budget falls to Parliament.
Naloga Računskega sodišča je, da podpira Parlament in njegov Odbor za proračunski nadzor pri spremljanju porabe sredstev EU.
The job of the Court of Auditors is to support Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control in monitoring the use of EU funds.
Zunanje revidiranje, ki je temelj tega, je v izključni pristojnosti Računskega sodišča.
The external audit which underpins this is the exclusive responsibility of the Court of Auditors.
Že ta opredelitev s številnimi pridržki kaže na to, kako veliko odprtih vprašanj, o katerih se je pogosto razpravljalo, skriva v sebi takšno sodelovanje.
The number of provisos in the Article quoted shows how many outstanding and much-debated questions are embodied in such cooperation.
Usklajevanje revizij, ki jih opravljajo Računsko sodišče in nacionalni revizijski organi v državah članicah, in obojestransko zagotavljanje podatkov o teh so ključnega pomena za učinkovito revidiranje porabe sredstev EU in za zagotavljanje, da ne prihaja do podvajanja revizijskih nalog.
Coordination of audits carried out by the Court of Auditors and national audit bodies in the Member States and mutual provision of information concerning these are crucial for the effective auditing of the use of EU funds and ensuring that there is no duplication of audit tasks.
Pomen tega je poudaril Parlament v svojem sklepu o razrešnici glede proračuna za leto 2003.
The importance of this was stressed by Parliament in its discharge decision in respect of the budget for 2003.
Glede na velik pomen tega vprašanja je Parlament (v sodelovanju s finskim nacionalnim parlamentom) 9. in 10. oktobra 2006 organiziral konferenco, namenjeno razjasnitvi vloge nacionalnih revizijskih organov pri reviziji proračuna EU, ki sem jo spremljal z velikim zanimanjem.
In view of the great importance of this matter, Parliament organised a conference on 9-10 October 2006, in conjunction with the Finnish national parliament, aimed at clarifying the role of national audit bodies in auditing the EU budget, and I followed this with considerable interest.
Tako sem ugotovil, da se pravni položaj in praktično stališče posameznih držav članicah precej razlikuje in da so na tem področju potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja in sporazumi, ki vključujejo vse zainteresirane strani.
As a result, I realised that the legal positions and practical standpoints of individual Member States vary considerably, and that further efforts and agreements involving all interested parties are needed in this area.
Da bi Računsko sodišče zagotavljalo trdno podporo delu nacionalnih revizijskih organov in njihovemu prispevku k revidiranju uporabe sredstev EU (v skladu s splošno veljavnimi načeli revizije), morajo biti izpolnjeni nekateri pogoji.
In order for the Court of Auditors to provide solid support to the work of national audit bodies and for their contribution to auditing the use of Union funds thereby to be seen as positive (whilst complying with the generally applicable principles of auditing), there are certain basic conditions which must be fulfilled.
Računsko sodišče je svoje stališče o tej zadevi, razen v številnih publikacijah in drugih mnenjih, podalo v svojem mnenju št. 6/2007.
The Court of Auditors set out its position on this matter, in addition to a number of publications and other opinions, in its Opinion No 6/2007.
Strinjam se s tukaj navedenimi stališči in rad bi poudaril, da to ni le analiza stanja in problema, ki odraža zapletenost vprašanja, temveč da hkrati določa ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti, da bi zagotovili napredek, vključno z nalogami, ki sodijo v področje pristojnosti Komisije in držav članic.
I share the views expressed here and would like to underline that this is not simply an analysis of the situation and the problem reflecting the complexity of the issue but that it also sets out the steps which must be taken in order to ensure progress, including tasks falling to the Commission and the Member States.
Pri usklajevanju nalog ima pomembno vlogo kontaktni odbor predsednikov Evropskega računskega sodišča in nacionalnih revizijskih organov ter odbor uradnikov za zvezo, kjer na rednih delovnih sestankih v različnih delovnih skupinah ocenjujejo nadaljnje možnosti za sodelovanje.
An important role in the task of coordination falls to the Contact Committee of the heads of the European Court of Auditors and its national counterparts and the Liaison Officers in terms of their regular meetings, in which further possibilities for cooperation are assessed in the context of a number of working groups.
Posebej je treba omeniti delovno skupino, ki se ukvarja s skupnimi standardi revidiranja in ki je bila leta 2006 ustanovljena z namenom, da pripravi skupne revizijske standarde in primerljiva revizijska merila, ki temeljijo na nacionalnih revizijskih standardih in se uporabljajo v okolju EU.
Of these, special mention must be made of the working group on common audit standards which was set up in 2006 in order to draw up common audit standards and comparative audit criteria, based on national audit standards and applicable in the EU environment.
Delovna skupina daje smernice vrhovnim revizijskim institucijam Evropske unije o uporabi mednarodnih revizijskih standardov, pri čemer se upoštevajo posebne značilnosti EU.
The working group gives guidance to the supreme audit institutions of the European Union on application of international audit standards, taking into account the special characteristics of the EU.
Skupna metodologija standardov Računskemu sodišču omogoča, da v vseh fazah načrtovanja in izvajanja svojega dela kot podlago uporablja delo nacionalnih revizijskih organov.
The joint methodology standards enable the Court of Auditors to use the work of the national audit bodies as the basis in all stages of planning and carrying out its work.
Nadaljnje poglabljanje sodelovanja med Evropskim računskim sodiščem in nacionalnimi računskimi sodišči bo v prihodnosti omogočilo vzporedno (t.i. pridruženo ali usklajeno) revidiranje.
By further developing their cooperation, the European Court of Auditors and national courts of auditors will enable parallel (associate or coordinated) audits to take place in the future.
Pridružene revizije so lahko koristne za vsa sodelujoča računska sodišča, saj omogočajo redno izmenjavo izkušenj in informacij in prispevajo tudi k usklajenemu izražanja priporočil za revidirance.
Associate audits would be useful for all participating courts of auditors, as they facilitate regular exchanges of experience and information and also contribute to the coherent expression of recommendations to auditees.
Ali bi umaknili svojo kandidaturo, če bi bilo mnenje Parlamenta o vašem imenovanju za člana Računskega sodišča negativno?
Would you withdraw your candidacy if Parliament's opinion on your appointment as a Member of the Court were unfavourable?
Pogodba določa, da Računsko sodišče pomaga Parlamentu pri nadzoru nad izvrševanjem proračuna.
The Treaty states that the Court of Auditors assists Parliament in exercising its powers of control over the implementation of the budget.
To sodelovanje je pogojeno z obstojem medsebojnega zaupanja in spoštovanja; z drugimi besedami, podpora Parlamenta je za člane Računskega sodišča nepogrešljiva, da bi lahko svoje naloge opravljali učinkovito.
This cooperation presupposes the existence of mutual trust and respect: in other words, Parliament’s support is indispensable for members of the Court of Auditors to complete their tasks efficiently.
Iz tega razloga bi, v kolikor Parlament ne bi dal pozitivnega mnenja, prosil svojo vlado, naj na podlagi mnenja Parlamenta izvede pregled moje kandidature.
Therefore, if Parliament did not give a favourable opinion, I would ask my government to conduct a review of my candidacy on the basis of Parliament’s opinion.
Kljub temu verjamem, da bo na podlagi moje dosedanje poslovne poti, ki odraža mojo zavezanost Evropi, mojih stališč, ki so izražena v odgovorih na vprašalnik, ter moje zaslišanja Parlament dal pozitivno mnenje o moji kandidaturi in podprl moje imenovanje za člana Računskega sodišča.
Nevertheless, I trust that, on the basis of my career so far (which reflects my commitment to Europe), my views as expressed in my responses to the questionnaire, and my hearing, Parliament will give a favourable opinion of my candidacy and support my appointment as a member of the Court of Auditors.
o predlaganju Rase Budbergyté za članico Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Rasa Budbergyté as a Member of the Court of Auditors
Priloga I: ŽIVLJENJEPIS RASE BUDBERGYTÉ
ANNEX 1: CURRICULUM VITAE OF Rasa Budbergyté
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI RASE BUDBERGYTÉ NA VPRAŠALNIK
ANNEX 2: ANSWERS BY Rasa Budbergyté TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE
– ob upoštevanju člena 286(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0018/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0018/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0039/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0039/2010 ),
A. ker Rasa Budbergyté izpolnjuje pogoje, ki jih določa člen 286(1) PDEU,
A. whereas Rasa Budbergyté fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
Ime in priimek: Rasa BUDBERGYTĖ
First name(s) / Surname(s) Rasa BUDBERGYTĖ
Datum rojstva: 8. maj 1960
Date of birth 8 May 1960
Delovne izkušnje
Work experience
Od februarja 2005:
February 2005 onwards
glavna revizorka
Auditor General
Državnega revizijskega urada Republike Litve
National Audit Office of the Republic of Lithuania
Od junija 2002 do februarja 2005:
June 2002 – February 2005
podsekretarka, ministrstvo za notranje zadeve
Undersecretary, Ministry of Internal Affairs
Od julija 2001 do junija 2002:
July 2001 – June 2002
namestnica podsekretarja, ministrstvo za notranje zadeve
Deputy Undersecretary, Ministry of Internal Affairs
Od septembra 1998 do decembra 2000:
September 1998 – December 2000
namestnica ministra, ministrstvo za pravosodje
Vice-minister, Ministry of Justice
Od januarja 1997 do septembra 1998:
January 1997 – September 1998
podsekretarka, ministrstvo za pravosodje
Undersecretary, Ministry of Justice
Od oktobra 1995 do januarja 1997:
October 1995 – January 1997
pravna svetovalka, Delniška družba Lelija
Legal Advisor, Joint Stock Company Lelija
Od januarja do aprila 1993:
January – April 1993
svetovalka predsednika vlade,
Advisor to the Prime Minister
vlada Republike Litve
Government of the Republic of Lithuania
Od aprila 1992 do januarja 1993:
April 1992 – January 1993
svetovalka, oddelek za pravne zadeve in sporazume,
Advisor, Legal Affairs and Agreements Division
ministrstvo za mednarodne gospodarske odnose Republike Litve
Ministry of International Economic Relations of the Republic of Lithuania
Od marca 1985 do marca 1992:
March 1985 – March 1992
glavna inšpektorica, oddelek za invalidske zadeve, višja svetovalka, oddelek za pripravo zakonodaje, ministrstvo za socialno varstvo Republike Litve
Chief inspector, Division for the Matters of Disabled, Senior consultant, Law Drafting Division, Ministry of Social Security of the Republic of Lithuania
Od avgusta 1983 do februarja 1985:
August 1983 – February 1985
vodja oddelka za splošne zadeve,
Head of General Division
mestni svet Marijampole
Marijampole Town Board
Od septembra 1997 do februarja 2005:
September 1997 – February 2005
asistentka profesorja,
Professor’s assistant
Univerza v Vilni, oddelek za delo pravne fakultete
Vilnius University, Labour Department of the Faculty of Law
Od septembra 1978 do junija 1983:
September 1978 – June 1983
pravnica (summa cum laude), civilno pravo
Lawyer (summa cum laude) Civil law
Univerza v Vilni, pravna fakulteta
Vilnius University, Faculty of Law
Osebne veščine in sposobnosti
Personal skills and competences
Materni jezik: litovski
Mother tongue(s) Lithuanian
Govorno sporazumevanje
Spoken interaction
Govorno sporočanje
Spoken production
Samostojni uporabnik
Independent user
Usposobljeni uporabnik
Proficient user
Računalniške veščine in sposobnosti
Computer skills and competences
Delo s programom Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access) (spričevalo ECDL)
Working with Microsoft Office software (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access) (ECDL licence)
Delo s programom Internet Explorer
Working with Internet Explorer
Druge veščine in sposobnosti
Other skills and competences
Leta 2005 je bila izvoljena za članico EUROSAI (Evropska organizacija vrhovnih revizijskih institucij)
In 2005 elected as a member of the EUROSAI (European Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions) Governing Board, in 2006-2008 a Vice-president
Dodatne informacije
Additional information
Leta 2009 prejela državno nagrado – križec poveljnice reda litovskega velikega kneza Gediminasa
In 2009 awarded the state award – Cross of Commander of the Order of the Lithuanian Grand Duke Gediminas
Svojo poklicno kariero sem v celoti posvetila javnemu sektorju, in sicer področjem javnih financ, upravljanja in revizije.
My entire career has been spent in the public sector, in the areas of public finance, management and auditing.
Kot svetovalka sem delala za litvanskega predsednika vlade, na ministrstvih za mednarodne gospodarske odnose, za pravosodje in za notranje zadeve ter na državnem uradu za revizijo.
I have worked as an advisor to the Prime Minister of Lithuania, as well as in the Ministries of International Economic Relations, Justice, and Internal Affairs, and in the National Audit Office.
Vodila sem tudi različne medresorske delovne skupine in komisije.
I have also managed various interdepartmental working groups and commissions.
Kot svetovalka predsednika vlade sem podajala zaključke o osnutkih pravnih aktov na področju javnih financ ter o obveznostih, sprejetih v imenu vlade.
As Advisor to the Prime Minister, I delivered conclusions on draft legal acts in the area of public finance and on liabilities undertaken on behalf of the Government.
Na Ministrstvu za mednarodne gospodarske odnose sem bila odgovorna za načrtovanje mednarodnih sporazumov o državnih posojilih za Republiko Litvo.
In the Ministry of International Economic Relations, I was responsible for designing international state loan agreements for the Republic of Lithuania.
Bila sem tudi članica vladne delegacije in sem se udeleževala pogajanj o posojilnih sporazumih s Svetovno banko in z Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj.
I was also a member of Government delegations and took part in negotiations on loan agreements with the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Kot podsekretarka na Ministrstvu za pravosodje in namestnica podsekretarja na Ministrstvu za notranje zadeve sem pridobila izkušnje iz upravljanja odobrenih sredstev državnega proračuna in zagotavljanja pravilnosti, gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti njihove uporabe.
As Undersecretary of the Ministry of Justice, as well as Deputy Undersecretary of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, I gained experience in managing State Budget appropriations and ensuring the regularity, economy, efficiency and effectiveness of their use.