natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(c) da varovano telekomunikacijsko omrežje omogoča pretok podatkov in vseh zaprosil za pravosodno sodelovanje med državami članicami ter med državami članicami in nacionalnimi člani, nacionalnimi korespondenti Eurojusta in sodniki za zvezo, ki jih imenuje Eurojust;
(c) the secure telecommunications network makes possible the flow of data and of all requests for judicial cooperation between Member States, as well as between them and the national members, national correspondents of Eurojust and liaison magistrates appointed by Eurojust;
(c) da varovane telekomunikacijske povezave omogočajo pretok podatkov in vseh zaprosil za pravosodno sodelovanje med državami članicami ter med državami članicami in nacionalnimi člani, nacionalnimi korespondenti Eurojusta in sodniki za zvezo, ki jih imenuje Eurojust;
(c) the secure telecommunications connections make possible the flow of data and of all requests for judicial cooperation between Member States, as well as between them and the national members, national correspondents of Eurojust and liaison magistrates appointed by Eurojust;
2) Varovano telekomunikacijsko omrežje iz odstavka 1 se lahko uporablja tudi za operativno delo nacionalnih korespondentov, nacionalnih korespondentov za področje terorizma, nacionalnih članov Eurojusta in sodnikov za zvezo, ki jih imenuje Eurojust.
2 ) The secure telecommunications network referred to in paragraph 1 may also be used for their operational work by the national correspondents, national correspondents for terrorist matters, the national members of Eurojust and liaison magistrates appointed by Eurojust.
Povezano je lahko s sistemom Eurojusta za vodenje primerov iz člena 16 Sklepa 2002/187/PNZ.
It may be linked to the Case Management System of Eurojust referred to in Article 16 of Decision 2002/187/JHA.
Varovane telekomunikacijske povezave iz odstavka 1 se lahko uporabljajo tudi za operativno delo nacionalnih korespondentov, nacionalnih korespondentov za področje terorizma, nacionalnih članov Eurojusta in sodnikov za zvezo, ki jih imenuje Eurojust.
The secure telecommunications connections referred to in paragraph 1 may also be used for their operational work by the national correspondents, national correspondents for terrorist matters, the national members of Eurojust and liaison magistrates appointed by Eurojust.
Uporaba varovane telekomunikacije ne izključuje neposrednih stikov med kontaktnimi točkami ali med pristojnimi organi držav članic.
The u se of secure telecommunications does not preclude direct contacts between contact points or between the competent authoritie s of the Member States.
Člen 11 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Eurojustu se v skladu s členom 8 tega sklepa omogoči dostop do centraliziranih podatkov Evropske pravosodne mreže in do varovanega telekomunikacijskega omrežja, vzpostavljenega v skladu s členom 10 tega sklepa;
(a) Eurojust shall have access to centralised information from the European Judicial Network in accordance with Article 8 of this Decision and to the secured telecommunication network set up under Article 10 of this Decision;
(a) Eurojustu se v skladu s členom 8 tega sklepa omogoči dostop do centraliziranih podatkov Evropske pravosodne mreže in do varovanih telekomunikacijskih povezav, vzpostavljenih v skladu s členom 10 tega sklepa;
(a) Eurojust shall have access to centralised information from the European Judicial Network in accordance with Article 8 of this Decision and to the secured telecommunication connections set up under Article 10 of this Decision;
Člen 11 – odstavek 1 – točka b
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) brez poseganja v člen 13 Sklepa 2002/187/PNZ in v skladu s členom 4(4) tega sklepa kontaktne točke Evropske pravosodne mreže Eurojust za vsak primer posebej obvestijo o primerih, ki zadevajo dve državi članici in sodijo v pristojnost Eurojusta:
(b) without prejudice to Article 13 of Decision 2002/187/JHA and in accordance with Article 4(4) of this Decision, the contact points of the European Judicial Network shall, on a case-by-case basis, inform Eurojust on cases involving two Member States and entering the field of competence of Eurojust:
(b) poleg obveznosti glede prenosa informacij Eurojustu iz člena 13 Sklepa 2002/187/PNZ kontaktne točke Evropske pravosodne mreže svojega nacionalnega člana Eurojusta za vsak primer posebej obvestijo o vseh ostalih primerih, za obravnavo katerih se zdi Eurojust primernejši.
(b) in addition to the obligation to transmit information to Eurojust stipulated in Article 13 of Decision 2002/187/JHA , the contact points of the European Judicial Network shall, on a case-by-case basis, inform their national m ember of Eurojust o f all other cases with which Eurojust is deemed to be in a better position to deal.
– če je verjetno, da bo prišlo do sporov o sodnih pristojnostih,
– in cases where conflicts of jurisdiction are likely to arise
– če je bilo zavrnjeno zaprosilo za pravosodno sodelovanje, vključno z evropskim nalogom za prijetje, evropskim dokaznim nalogom, nalogom za zamrznitev sredstev in zaprosilom za medsebojno pravno pomoč.
– in cases of a refusal of a request for judicial cooperation, including European Arrest Warrants, European Evidence Warrants, orders for the freezing of assets and requests for mutual legal assistance.
Zdi se, da zadošča, če se Eurojust in Evropska pravosodna mreža medsebojno obveščata, kadar menita, da bi bilo primerneje, da primer obravnava drugi.
It seems to be sufficient if Eurojust and the EJN inform each other when they are of the opinion that the other one would be in a better position to handle the case.
Zato ni treba nadalje določati specifičnih situacij, v katerih bi Evropska pravosodna mreža morala obveščati Eurojust.
Therefore there is no need to further determine specific situations in which the EJN should be obliged to inform Eurojust.
Treba je preprečiti, da bi postopek postal preveč zapleten in okoren.
It should be avoided that the procedure gets to complicated and cumbersome.
Člen 11 – odstavek 1 – točka (c)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) Kontaktne točke Evropske pravosodne mreže obvestijo Eurojust za vsak primer posebej tudi o vseh primerih, ki sodijo v pristojnost Eurojusta in zadevajo vsaj tri države članice.
(c) The contact points of the European Judicial Network shall also inform Eurojust, on a case-by-case basis, on all cases entering the field of competence of Eurojust and involving at least three Member States;
Člen 11 – odstavek 1 – točka f
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) Nacionalni člani Eurojusta se lahko na povabilo Evropske pravosodne mreže udeležujejo njenih sestankov.
(f) the national members of Eurojust may attend meetings of the European Judicial Network at the latter’s invitation.
Kontaktne točke evropske pravosodne mreže so lahko za vsak primer posebej vabljene na sestanke Eurojusta .
European Judicial Network contact points may be invited on a case-by-case basis to attend Eurojust meetings.
Prav tako se kontaktne točke Evropske pravosodne mreže lahko na povabilo udeležujejo sestankov Eurojusta .
Likewise European Judicial Network contact points may attend meetings of Eurojust at its invit a tion.
Kadar se osebni podatki izmenjujejo med pristojnimi organi ali kontaktnimi točkami držav članic, se zagotovi, da:
When personal data are exchanged between the competent authorities or the co n tact points of the Member States , they shall ensure that :
– pristojni organi, ki podatke prejmejo, te podatke obdelajo le za namene, za katere so jih prejeli;
– the receiving competent authority processes the data only for the purposes for which the data have been supplied ;
– se sprejmejo ukrepi, s katerimi se zagotovi, da se osebni podatki učinkovito varujejo pred naključnim ali nepooblaščenim uničenjem, naključno izgubo, nepooblaščenim dostopom, nepooblaščeno ali naključno spremembo in nepooblaščeno objavo.
– steps are taken to ensure that personal data are effectively protected against acc i dental or unauthorised destruction , accidental loss , unauthorised access , unautho r ised or a c cidental alteration and unauthorised disclosure.
Specifične kategorije podatkov (osebni podatki, ki razkrivajo raso ali narodnost, politične nazore, verska ali filozofska prepričanja, članstvo v stranki ali sindikatu, spolno usmerjenost ali zdravje, ali podatki v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, kazenskimi obsodbami ali varnostnimi ukrepi) se obravnavajo le, kadar je to nujno potrebno za delovanje Evropske pravosodne mreže.
Specific categories of data (personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, polit i cal opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, party or trade union membe r ship, sexual orientation or health or data relating to offences, criminal convictions or s e curity measures) shall be processed only when it is strictly necessary for the pe r formance of the activities of the European Judicial Network.
V tem primeru se uvedejo dodatni zaščitni ukrepi, kot so:
In that case, add i tional saf e guards shall be put in place, such as :
– dostop do podatkov se omogoči le osebam, ki so odgovorne za izvedbo upravičene naloge, ki opravičuje obdelavo;
– access to the data concerned only for personnel who is responsible for the performance of the legitimate task that justifies the processing ;
– strogo šifriranje za prenos;
– strong encryption for transmission ;
– podatke se hrani le toliko časa, kolikor je potrebno, da pristojni organi in kontaktne točke opravijo svoje naloge.
– retention of the data for only as long as necessary for the competent author i ties and the contact points to perform their tasks.
Evropska pravosodna mreža olajšuje neposredne stike in izmenjavo podatkov med pristojnimi organi držav članic v okviru pravosodnega sodelovanja.
The European Judicial Network facilitates direct contacts and exchange of data b e tween the competent authorities of the Member States in the framework of judicial cooper a tion.
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da se spoštuje določena stopnja varstva podatkov in da se vzpostavijo dodatni zaščitni ukrepi, ko se izmenjujejo specifične – občutljive – kategorije podatkov, do česar pogosto pride pri zaprošanju za pravno pomoč.
Therefore it has to be made sure that a certain level of data protection is o b served and that additional safeguards are put in place when specific - sensitive - cat e gories of data are exchanged , which often is the case when requesting legal assi s tance.
Ker do sedaj na ravni Evropske unije ni bilo nobenega pravnega instrumenta za zaščito osebnih podatkov, je v tem besedilu treba zagotoviti določbo o varstvu podatkov.
Since there is - up to now - no legal instrument on European Union level as regards the protection of personal data , it is necessary to have a data protection provision in this text.
Obveščanje Sveta in Komisije
Informing the Council and the Commission
Upravni direktor Eurojusta in predsedstvo Sveta vsako drugo leto pisno poročata Svetu in Komisiji o dejavnostih in upravljanju Evropske pravosodne mreže, vključno z proračunskim upravljanjem.
The Administrative Director of Eurojust and the Presidency of the Council shall report to the Council and the Commission in writing every second year on the activities and management, including budgetary management, of the European Judicial Network.
V ta namen predsedstvo pripravi dvoletno poročilo o dejavnostih Evropske pravosodne mreže in o morebitnih problemih na področju politike na področju kriminala v Uniji, ki so bili izpostavljeni v okviru dejavnosti Evropske pravosodne mreže.
To that end, the Presidency shall prepare a bi-annual report on the activities of the European Judicial Network and on any criminal policy problems within the Union highlighted as a result of the European Judicial Network's activities.
V tem poročilu lahko Evropska pravosodna mreža prek predsedstva predlaga tudi izboljšave pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah.
In that report, the European Judicial Network, through the Presidency, may also make proposals for the improvement of judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
Evropska pravosodna mreža lahko prav tako predloži morebitna poročila ali morebitne druge informacije o svojem delovanju, ki jih lahko od nje zahteva Svet ali predsedstvo.
The European Judicial Network may also submit any report or any other information on the operation of the European Judicial Network which may be required by the Council or the Presidency.
Delno prestavljeno v člen 15.
Partly moved to Article 15.
Člen 15 – naslov
Article 15 – Title
Ocena delovanja Evropske pravosodne mreže
Assessment of the operation of the European Judicial Network
Poročanje Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji ter ocena delovanja Evropske pravosodne mreže
Reporting to the European Parli a ment, the Council and the Commission and assessment of the operation of the European Judicial Network
Evropska pravosodna mreža vsaki dve leti pisno poroča Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji o svojih dejavnostih in upravljanju, vključno s proračunskim upravljanjem.
The European Judicial Network shall report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in writing every second year on its activities and management, including its budgetary management.
V svojem poročilu lahko navede tudi morebitne težave na področju kriminalitetne politike v Uniji, ki so se pokazale pri delovanju Evropske pravosodne mreže, in lahko predlaga izboljšave pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah.
The European Judicial Network may in its report also indicate any criminal policy problems within the Union highlighted as a result of the European Judicial Network's activ i ties and may also make proposals for the improvement of judicial cooper a tion in criminal matters.
Evropska pravosodna mreža lahko na zahtevo Sveta prav tako predloži poročila ali druge informacije o svojem delovanju.
The European Judicial Network may also submit any report or provide any other i n formation on the operation of the European Judicial Network which may be requested by the Council.
Svet vsaka štiri leta oceni delovanje Evropske pravosodne mreže na podlagi poročila, ki ga v sodelovanju z Evropsko pravosodno mrežo pripravi Komisija.
The Council shall, every four years, carry out an assessment of the operation of the European Judicial Network on the basis of a report drawn up by the Commission, in cooperation with the European Judicial Network.
Bolj smiselno je, da poročilo o dejavnostih in upravljanju pripravi Evropska pravosodna mreža, ne upravni direktor Eurojusta.
It makes more sense that the report on activities and management is drawn up by the European Judicial Network itself instead of the Administrative Director of Eurojust.
Evropska pravosodna mreža je v najboljšem položaju, da opredeli težave in predlaga izboljšave pravosodnega sodelovanja.
The Network itself is in the best position to identify problems and also to make proposals on improving judicial cooperation.
Poročilo mora predložiti tudi Evropskemu parlamentu.
This report has also to be submitted to the European Parliament.
Evropska pravosodna mreža je bila ustanovljena s skupnim ukrepom z dne 29. junija 1998.
The European Judicial Network (the EJN) was established by Joint Action of 29 June 1998.
Sestavljena je iz centralnih organov, odgovornih za mednarodno pravosodno sodelovanje, in pravosodnih ali drugih pristojnih organov s posebnimi odgovornostmi na področju mednarodnega sodelovanja.
The EJN is a network of central authorities responsible for international judicial cooperation and the judicial or other competent authorities with specific responsibilities within the context of international judicial cooperation.
Vsaka država članica določi kontaktne točke, ki zagotavljajo pravne in praktične informacije ter vzpostavljajo stike med pravosodnimi in drugimi pristojnimi organi držav članic, da se olajša pravosodno sodelovanje med državami članicami.
Every Member State nominates contact points that provide for legal and practical information and establish contacts between the judicial or other competent authorities of the Member States in order to facilitate judicial cooperation between the Member States.
V devetih letih se je Evropska pravosodna mreža izkazala kot zelo uporaben sistem pri pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah.
After nine years of existence, the EJN has proved a very useful system in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
Mreža je bila ustanovljena pred skoraj desetimi leti, struktura se je razvijala in sedaj je treba ustrezno prilagoditi zakonodajni akt.
Since the network was established almost ten years ago the structure developed and thus it is necessary now to adapt the legislative act accordingly.
Predlog v celoti nadomešča obstoječi pravni okvir z novim instrumentom, vendar ohranja splošno strukturo in vsebino skupnega ukrepa.
The proposal fully replaces the existing legal framework by a new instrument.
Veliko členov je prevzetih brez sprememb.
However, the general structure and content of the Joint Action is maintained in the proposal and many Articles are taken over unchanged.
Predlog na splošno odraža sedanjo prakso delovanja Evropske pravosodne mreže.
The proposal broadly reflects the current practice of the operation of the EJN.
Glavne točke predloga:
Main points of the proposal:
Oblikovanje nacionalnih korespondentov Evropske pravosodne mreže
Creation of national correspondents of the EJN
Za zagotovitev nemotenega notranje delovanja nacionalnih kontaktnih točk, je treba eno kontaktno točko določiti za nacionalnega korespondenta, ki usklajuje dejavnosti Evropske pravosodne mreže na nacionalni ravni.
In order to ensure smooth internal functioning of national contact points, there is a need to appoint one contact point as national correspondent to coordinate EJN activities at national level.
Jasnejši odnos z Eurojustom
Clarification of the relationship to Eurojust
Predlagano je, da se ohranita oba organa – Eurojust in Evropska pravosodna mreža – saj se je izkazalo, da imata pomembno vlogo pri pravosodnem sodelovanju.
It is proposed to maintain both bodies - Eurojust and the EJN - as they have proven their essential role in judicial cooperation.
Vzpostavitev varovanega telekomunikacijskega omrežja.
Creation of secure telecommunication network.
Predlog predvideva vzpostavitev varovanega telekomunikacijskega omrežja, saj pravosodni organi potrebujejo orodje za varovano telekomunikacijo, s katerim bi lahko med seboj navezali stik in pošiljali zaprosila za pravno pomoč.
The proposal envisages the creation of a secure telecommunication network as judicial authorities need a secure telecommunication tool through which they could contact each other and send requests for legal assistance.
Poudarek na pravosodnem usposabljanju
Emphasis on judicial training
Mnenje poročevalke:
Position of the rapporteur:
Poročevalka meni, da se je v zadnjih letih izkazalo, da Evropska pravosodna mreža deluje zelo dobro, zato naj se dodatna pravila določijo le, kjer je to potrebno.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that the European Judicial Network has proved to be functioning very well in recent years and therefore additional rules should only be laid down where necessary.
Ne sme pa se spreminjati prožne decentralizirane strukture, ki je prednost Evropske pravosodne mreže.
The strength of the EJN, its flexible decentralised structure should not be touched.
Zatorej veliko predlogov sprememb kodificira tisto, kar se večinoma že uporablja v praksi (določbe o nacionalnih korespondentih in njihovih nalogah, nacionalnih informacijskih kontaktnih točkah in njihovih nalogah, o kraju in namenu srečanj mreže, itd.).
Consequently many amendments proposed aim at codifying what is mainly exercised in practice already (provisions on national correspondents and their tasks, national information contact points and their tasks, venue and purpose of meetings of the Network, etc.).
Novosti se uvajajo za zavarovanje telekomunikacij.
Innovations are introduced with a view to secure telecommunication.
Ker se izmenjujejo – občutljivi – osebni podatki, je potreben sistem, ki omogoča uporabo varovanih telekomunikacijskih povezav, da se podatki iz ene države v drugo varno prenašajo.
Since - sensitive - personal data is exchanged it is essential to have a system in place that allows for using secure telecommunication connections to securely transmit data from one Member State to another one.
Vendar pa treba tudi preučiti možnost, da se dostop do teh varovanih povezav omogoči vsem pristojnim nacionalnim organom, ki so odgovorni za mednarodno pravosodno sodelovanje (ne le kontaktnim točkam), saj lahko ti organi tudi neposredno navežejo stike s pristojnimi organi v drugi državi članici in pošljejo zaprosila za pravno pomoč (npr. evropski nalog za prijetje, vključno s prstnimi odtisi).
It should also be considered to provide all competent authorities having responsibilities within the context of international judicial cooperation (not only the contact points) with access to secure telecommunication since these authorities can as well directly contact the competent authorities in another Member State and transmit request s for legal assistance (e.g. sending a European Arrest Warrant, including fingerprints).
Ker predlog še ni veljaven in pravila niso del prava Evropske unije, se zdi ustrezno, da se v ta sklep vstavi člen o varstvu podatkov, in sicer v zvezi z osnovnimi pravili varovanja (omejitev namena, fizično varovanje podatkov), ter dodatna jamstva, kadar gre za izmenjavo specifičnih – občutljivih – kategorij podatkov (kot na primer podatki v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji ali kazenskimi obsodbami).
Since the former is not yet in force and the latter rules are not European Union law it seems appropriate to insert an article on data protection in this Decision regarding basic protection rules (purpose limitation, physical security of data) and additional safeguards when exchanging specific – sensitive - categories of data (such as data relating to offences or criminal convictions).
Glede izmenjave informacij o posebnih primerih med Evropsko pravosodno mrežo in Eurojustom je v členu 13 2008/../PNZ (sklep o Eurojustu) mogoče najti splošno pravilo o tem, kdaj in kakšne informacije se izmenjujejo.
As regards transmitting information on specific cases between the EJN and Eurojust the general rule on when and what information has to be transmitted to Eurojust can be found in Art. 13 of 2008/../JHA (Eurojust-Decision).
To velja tudi za kontaktne točke Evropske pravosodne mreže.
This also applies to the EJN contact points.
Vendar mora obstajati dodatna obveznost, da Evropska pravosodna mreža vedno obvesti Eurojust o primeru – kljub temu, da pogoji iz člena 13 2008/.../PNZ niso izpolnjeni – ko kontaktne točke Evropske pravosodne mreže ugotovijo, da bi bilo ustrezneje, če bi primer obravnaval Eurojust.
However there should be the additional obligation that EJN always informs Eurojust on a case - even though the conditions of Art. 13 2008/.../JHA are not met - when the contact points of EJN realize that the case could be better dealt with by Eurojust.
Enako velja za Eurojust v primeru, ko bi bilo ustrezneje, da bi primer obravnavala Evropska pravosodna mreža.
This also applies to Eurojust when having a case that could be better dealt with by EJN.
V zvezi s poročanjem o dejavnostih in upravljanju mreže poročevalka meni, da bi takšno poročilo morala pripraviti Evropska pravosodna mreža, saj najlažje opredeli težave in predlaga, kako izboljšati pravosodno sodelovanje.
With a view to reporting on the activities and the management of the Network, such a report should be drawn up by the EJN, since the Network itself is in the best position to identify problems and also to make proposals on improving judicial cooperation.
To poročilo mora predložiti tudi Parlamentu, da lahko opravi svojo vlogo in izpolni naloge, ki jih določajo pogodbe.
This report also has to be submitted to the Parliament so that is can fulfil its role and tasks assigned by the Treaties.
Pomemben je tudi predlog spremembe v zvezi z imenovanjem kontaktnih točk.
Another important amendment concerns the nomination of contact points.