natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(e) v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4(2) je bila odločba izdana v nenavzočnosti , razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je:
(e) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4(2), the decision was rendered in absentia , unless the certificate states that the person:
(e) če je bila odločba v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4(2) izdana po sojenju , na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice :
(e) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4(2), the decision was rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person, unless the certificate states that the person, in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State :
Člen 8, odstavek 2, točka (e), točka (i)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e – point i
( i) bila oseba osebno povabljena ali prek pristojnega zastopnika pravočasno in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju obravnave , ki se je zaključila z odredbo o zaplembi, izdano v nenavzočnosti,
(i) was summoned in person or informed in accordance with the national law of the issuing State through a competent representative and in due time, of the scheduled date and place of the hearing which led to the confiscation order rendered in absentia
( a) neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način , da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem,
(a ) either was directly summoned in person or by other means actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial,
obveščena o dejstvu , da se lahko odredba o zaplembi izreče v primeru, če se oseba ne udeleži sojenja ,
informed about the fact that such a confiscation order may be handed down in case the person does not appear for the trial;
(b) osebno obveščena, da se lahko odredba o zaplembi izreče v primeru, če se ne udeleži sojenja ;
( b ) was personally informed that a confiscation order may be handed down if he/she did not appear at the trial;
Člen 8– odstavek 2– točka (e) – točka (i a) (novo)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e – point i a (new)
(ia) je po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
(ia) having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Člen 8 – odstavek 2 – točka (e) – točka (ii)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e – point ii
(ii) potem , ko ji je bila vročena odredba o zaplembi , izdana v nenavzočnosti, in je bila obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja in pravici , da je prisotna na tem sojenju :
(ii) after being served with the confiscation order rendered in absentia and being expressly informed about the right to a retrial and to be present at that trial :
(ii) po tem , ko ji je bila osebno vročena odredba o zaplembi in je bila izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o pravici do pritožbe ali ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo v razveljavitev prvotne odločbe :
(ii) after being personally served with the confiscation order and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood , about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed :
– je oseba izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odredbe o zaplembi,
– expressly stated that he or she does not contest the confiscation order;
– oseba izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odredbe o zaplembi,
– expressly stated that he or she did not contest the confiscation order;
- ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja ali vložila pritožbe v ustreznem roku, ki je vsaj 10 dni in najdlje 15dni.
– did not request a retrial or an appeal in the applicable timeframe, which shall be a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of 15 days.
Člen 4 – točka 3
Article 4 – point 3
Priloga – polje j – točki 1 in 2
Annex – box j – points 1 and 2
(j) Navedite, ali je bila odločba izdana v nenavzočnosti :
(j) Indicate if the decision was rendered in absentia :
(j) Navedite, ali je bila oseba navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi :
(j) Indicate if the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the confiscation order :
1.  Da, oseba je bila navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi .
1.  Yes, the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the confiscation order.
2.  Da, bila je.
2.  Yes, it was.
Če ste odgovorili z "da", prosimo potrdite:
If you have answered yes, please confirm that:
2.  Ne, oseba ni bila navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi.
2.  No, the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the confiscation order.
Če ste na to vprašanje odgovorili z "ne", prosimo navedite, ali:
If you answered “no” to th is question, please indicate if:
Priloga – polje j – točka 2.1
Annex – box j – point 2.1
2.1 da je bila zadevna oseba osebno povabljena ali prek pristojnega zastopnika pravočasno in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju obravnave , ki se je zaključila z odločbo , izdano v nenavzočnosti, in obveščena o dejstvu , da se lahko takšna odločba izreče v primeru , če se oseba ne udeleži sojenja
2.1 the person was summoned in person or informed in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State through a competent representative and in due time, of the scheduled date and place of the hearing which led to the decision rendered in absentia and informed about the fact that such a decision may be handed down in case the person does not appear for the trial
2.1 je bila oseba neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko pravočasno uradno obveščena, v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja , ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi , in sicer tako, da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim datumom in krajem sojenja in je bila osebno obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče tudi , če se sojenja ne udeleži ;
2.1 the person was directly summoned in person or by other means actually received official information in due time, in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State, and in a language which he/she understood, about the scheduled date and place of the trial which led to the confiscation order , in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that the person concerned was aware of the scheduled date and place of the trial and was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear at the trial
Kdaj in kje ( datum in kraj ) je bila oseba povabljena ali kako drugače osebno uradno obveščena:
Time and place when and where the person was summoned or received the official information in person by other means :
Priloga – polje j – točka 2.1 a (novo)
Annex – box j – point 2.1 a (new)
Priloga – polje j – točka 2.2
Annex – box j – point 2.2
2.2 da je oseba po vročitvi odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti, izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe, izdane v nenavzočnosti .
2.2 the person, after being served with the decision rendered in absentia , expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia .
2.2 je bila oseba po tem , ko ji je bila osebno vročena odredba o zaplembi in je bila v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, izrecno obveščena o pravici do pritožbe ali ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe, izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odredbe .
2.2 the person, after being personally served with the confiscation order and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , expressly stated that he or she did not contest the order.
Opišite, kdaj in kako je oseba izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe, izdane v nenavzočnosti :
Describe when and how the person expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia :
Opišite, kdaj je bila osebi odločba vročena, na kakšen način je bila obveščena o svoji pravici do ponovnega sojenja in pritožbe in kako je izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odredbe o zaplembi :
Describe when the person was served with the decision, how he/she was informed about his/her right to a retrial or to an appeal and when and how the person expressly stated that he or she did not contest the confiscation order:
Priloga – polje j – točka 2.3
Annex – box j – point 2.3
 2.3 je bila osebi osebno vročena odredba o zaplembi dne ….. (dan/mesec/leto) in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja ali do pritožbe v državi članici izdajateljici pod naslednjimi pogoji:
 2.3 the person was personally served with the confiscation order on ………… (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial or an appeal in the issuing State under the following conditions:
– oseba je imela po tem, ko je bila obveščena o tej pravici, na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje , vendar v tem času ponovnega sojenja ni zahtevala .
– after being informed of this right, the person had …. days to request a retrial and he or she did not request it during this period.
– je imela oseba po tem, ko je bila obveščena o tej pravici, na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje ali vloži pritožbo, česar v tem času ni storila .
- after being informed of that right, the person had ...... days to request a retrial or an appeal and he or she did not request it during that period.
Člen 5 – točka 1
Article 5 – point 1
Okvirni sklep 2008/.../PNZ
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA
(e) "Odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti" pomeni odločbo, kot je opredeljena v točki (a), če oseba ni bila osebno navzoča v sodnem postopku, iz katerega izhaja ta odločba.";
(e) "Decision rendered in absentia " shall mean a decision as defined in (a) when the person did not personally appear in the proceedings resulting in that decision."
Člen 5 – točka 2
Article 5 – point 2
Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – točka f
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) če je bila odločba izdana v nenavzočnosti v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je:
(f) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the decision was rendered in absentia , unless the certificate states that the person:
(f) če je bila odločba v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4 izdana po sojenju , na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice :
(f) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the decision was rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person, unless the certificate states that the person , in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State :
Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – točka f – točka i
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f – point i
(b) osebno obveščena, da se lahko odločba izda tudi , če se ne udeleži sojenja ;
( b) was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear for the trial;
Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – točka (f) – točka (i a) (novo)
Article 9 - paragraph 1 – point f – point i a (new)
(ia) je po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
(ia) having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial , had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – točka f – točka ii
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f – point ii
(ii) potem , ko ji je bila vročena odločba , izdana v nenavzočnosti, in je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja in pravici , da je prisotna na tem sojenju :
(ii) after being served with the decision rendered in absentia and being expressly informed about the right to a retrial and to be present at that trial :
(ii) po tem , ko ji je bila osebno vročena odločba in je bila izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o pravici do pritožbe ali do ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo v razveljavitev prvotne odločbe :
(ii) after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood , about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed :
- ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja ali vložila pritožbe v ustreznem roku, ki je vsaj 10 dni in najdlje 15 dni.
– did not request a retrial or an appeal in the applicable timeframe, which shall be a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of 15 days.
Člen 5 – točka 3
Article 5 – point 3
Priloga – polje k – točka 1 – točki a in b
Annex – box k – point 1 - points a and b
a.  Ne, ni bila.
a.  No, it was not
a.  Da, oseba je bila navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo .
a.  Yes, the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision.
b.  Da, bila je.
b.  Yes, it was.
b.  Ne, oseba ni bila navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo.
b.  No, the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the decision.
Okvirni sklep 2002/.../PNZ
Framework Decision 2002/.../JHA
Priloga – polje k – točka 1 – točka b.1
Annex – box k – point 1 - point b.1
 b.1 da je bila oseba osebno povabljena ali prek pristojnega zastopnika pravočasno in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju obravnave , ki se je zaključila z odločbo, izdano v nenavzočnosti, in obveščena o dejstvu , da se lahko takšna odločba izreče v primeru , če se oseba ne udeleži sojenja
 b.1 the person was summoned in person or informed in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State through a competent representative and in due time, of the scheduled date and place of the hearing which led to the decision rendered in absentia and informed about the fact that such a decision may be handed down in case the person does not appear for the trial
 b.1 je bila oseba neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko pravočasno uradno obveščena, v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja , ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim datumom in krajem sojenja in je bila osebno obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče tudi , če se sojenja ne udeleži ;
 b.1 the person was directly summoned in person or by other means actually received official information in due time and in a language which he/she understood , in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State , , about the scheduled date and place of the trial which led to the decision in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that the person concerned was aware of the scheduled date and place of the trial and was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear at the trial
Priloga – polje k – točka 1 – točka b.1 a (novo)
Annex – box k – point 1 - point b.1 a (new)
 b.1a je oseba po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
 b.1a having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Priloga – polje k – točka 1 – točka b.2
Annex – box k – point 1 - point b.2
 b.2 da je oseba po vročitvi odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti, izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti
 b.2 the person, after being served with the decision rendered in absentia , expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia .
 b.2 je oseba po tem , ko ji je bila osebno vročena odločba in je bila izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o pravici do pritožbe ali do ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo v razveljavitev prvotne odločbe, izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe ;
 b.2 the person, after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision.
Priloga – polje k – točka 1 – točka b.3
Annex – box k – point 1 - point b.3
 b.3 osebi je bila vročena odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti, dne ….. (dan/mesec/leto) in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja v državi članici izdajateljici pod naslednjimi pogoji:
 b.3 the person was served with the decision rendered in absentia on ………… (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial in the issuing State under the following conditions:
 b.3 je bila osebi ……… (dan/mesec/leto) osebno vročena odločba, izdana po sojenju, na katerem ni bila navzoča, in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe v državi članici izdajateljici pod naslednjimi pogoji:
 b.3 the person was personally served with the decision following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person on ………… (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial or to an appeal in the issuing State under the following conditions:
– je imela oseba po tem, ko je bila obveščena o tej pravici, na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje ali vloži pritožbo, česar v tem času ni storila .
- after being informed of that right, the person had ...... days to request a retrial or an appeal and he or she did not make such a request during that period.
Spremembe Okvirnega sklepa 2008/…/PNZ
Amendments to Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA
Okvirni sklep 2008/../PNZ se spremeni:
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA is hereby amended as follows:
1) v členu … se točka … nadomesti z naslednjim:
1 ) in Article ... , point .... shall be replaced by the following:
(h) če je bila odločba v skladu s potrdilom iz člena … izdana po sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice:
(h) according to the certificate provided for in Article ... , the decision was rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person, unless the certificate states that the person, in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State:
(a) pravočasno in v jeziku, ki ga je razumela,
(a) in due time, and in a language which he/she understood,
- neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja, in sicer tako, da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem,
- either was directly summoned in person or by other means actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial,
- osebno obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče tudi, če se ne udeleži sojenja;
- was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear at the trial;
(b) po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju; ali je
(b) having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial , had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial; or
(c) po tem, ko ji je bila osebno vročena odločba in je bila izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o pravici do pritožbe ali do ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe:
(c) after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed :
– izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe;
- expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision;