natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega postopkovna pravila za izvrševanje ostajajo razdrobljena.
In addition, the procedural rules for enforcement remain fragmented.
Različni nacionalni pravni sistemi in sistemi za izvrševanje otežujejo učinkovito obravnavo kršitev znotraj EU.
Differing national legal and enforcement systems make it difficult to tackle intra-EU infringements in an efficient way.
Nekateri javni organi imajo za preprečevanje kršitev na voljo obsežna sredstva, drugi pa morajo primere privesti pred sodišče in se soočiti z dolgotrajnimi postopki.
Some public authorities have rather far-reaching means to stop an infringement whereas others have to go to court and face fairly lengthy proceedings.
Problem so lahko tudi sodni stroški.
Court costs may also pose problems.
Kot je določeno v členu 15 uredbe, je organ prosilec dolžen poravnati vse stroške in izgube, ki so nastali zaradi ukrepov, ki so se izkazali za neutemeljene.
As provided for in Article 15 of the Regulation, the applicant authority shall remain liable for any costs and losses incurred as a result of measures held to be unfounded.
V nekaterih državah, na primer na Finskem, organu prosilcu v skladu z ustreznimi pravili stroškov ni treba plačati, vendar pa v mnogih državah ni tako.
In some countries, like Finland, the applicant authority does not have to pay as no-cost rule is applied, but in many countries this is not the case.
To bi lahko zmanjšalo število sproženih postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, če organ prosilec ne more kriti morebitnih stroškov sodnega postopka.
This may reduce the number of infringement procedures to be taken up, if the applicant authority is not able to bear the possible costs of the court proceedings.
Nenazadnje pa dejstvo, da traja vse dlje, da se zahteve zaključijo (povprečno 81 dni do junija 2008, do konca leta 2008 pa se je podaljšalo na 148 dni), je mogoče delno pojasniti z večjo zapletenostjo čezmejnih primerov, vendar pa je to pogosto pokazatelj neupoštevanja določenih rokov ali drugih pogojev delovanja.
Finally, the fact that requests are taking longer and longer to be closed (an average of 81 days until June 2008, this figure had increased to 148 days by the end of 2008) can partially be explained by the greater complexity of cross-border cases, but is often an indicator of non-compliance with established deadlines or other operating requirements.
To tudi vpliva na število zahtev, ki je leta 2010 ostalo enako oziroma se je celo zmanjšalo.
This in turn has an effect on the number of requests which seem to have stagnated or even decreased in 2010.
Ta trend pa ni to, kar si želimo, zato ga je treba čim prej spremeniti, da bi dosegli končni cilj uredbe o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov.
This is not a desirable trend and should be reversed as soon as possible in order to meet the ultimate aim of the CPC Regulation.
Poročevalec je trdno prepričan, da upad števila zahtev ne odraža zmanjšanja števila kršitev znotraj EU, ampak pomanjkljivosti sistema.
It is the Rapporteur's firm conviction that the decline in the number of requests does not reflect a decrease in the number of intra-EU infringements but rather the shortcomings of the system.
V zvezi z vprašanjem usklajevanja lahko rečemo, da sedanji sektorski pristop za politične pobude na področju varstva potrošnikov ne omogoča usklajenega izvrševanja.
Regarding the issue of coordination, the current sector-based approach for consumer policy initiatives does not facilitate coherent enforcement.
Pri usklajevanju izvrševanja vseevropskih dejavnosti bi bilo treba Komisiji nameniti večjo vlogo, saj to vprašanje trenutno ni ustrezno obravnavano.
A greater role for the Commission in coordinating the enforcement of pan-European activities would be necessary as this problem is currently insufficiently addressed.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba za izpolnitev cilja spodbujanja boljšega varstva potrošnikov v Evropi razširiti področje uporabe uredbe o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov, da bi bil zakonodajni organ EU za varstvo potrošnikov v njej izražen na bolj holističen in horizontalen način.
The Rapporteur is also of the opinion that, in order to meet the objectives of fostering better consumer protection in Europe, the scope of the CPC Regulation should be broadened in order to reflect the EU legislative body of consumer protection in a more holistic and horizontal way.
Področje uporabe te uredbe je bilo že nekoliko razširjeno, vendar bi bilo treba pripraviti splošnejšo oceno področja uporabe, da bi vključevala zakonodajo, ki jo upravljajo različni oddelki Komisije (npr. zakonodaja o finančnih storitvah, pravicah potnikov).
The scope of the CPC Regulation has already been to some extent broadened, but a more general assessment of the scope should take place to include legislation managed by different departments of the Commission (e.g. financial services, passenger rights legislation).
Glede na to, da aktualni rezultati čezmejnega sodelovanja na področju izvrševanja niso zadovoljivi in da je treba ukrepati, je poročevalec v tem predlogu opredelil tri različne vrste ukrepov v zvezi s tem predlogom:
Taking into account that the current results of cross-border enforcement cooperation are not satisfactory and that measures need to be taken, the Rapporteur has identified three alternative lines of action in relation to this proposal:
(a) predlagati znatne spremembe, katerih cilj bo obravnava problemov, ki so bili doslej opaženi pri uporabi uredbe, (b) sprejeti tehnični predlog Komisije, ne da bi predlagali spremembe, (c) predlagati omejeno število sprememb, na primer revizijsko klavzulo, in s tem prositi Komisijo, naj pripravi oceno učinkovitosti in operativnih mehanizmov uredbe ter v primernem času pripravi zakonodajni predlog, katerega cilj bo temeljitejši pregled sedanje uredbe, vključno s širšim področjem uporabe.
(a) propose substantive amendments aimed at addressing the problems that have been so far identified in the application of the Regulation, (b) accept the Commission's technical proposal without proposing any modifications, (c) propose a limited number of amendments, i.e. a ‘review clause’, asking the Commission to undertake an assessment of the effectiveness and operational mechanisms of the Regulation, and come up, within a plausible timeframe, with a legislative proposal aimed at a more substantial revision of the current Regulation, including the broadening of its scope.
Poročevalec priznava, da je treba hitro posodobiti in konsolidirati prilogo k uredbi, da bi zagotovili pravno varnost za podjetja, potrošnike in izvršilne organe,
Recognising the need for a fast update and consolidation of the Regulation's Annex, in order to ensure legal certainty for business, consumers and enforcement authorities,
ter meni, da je na tej stopnji najprimernejša tretja možnost.
the Rapporteur considers the third option to be the most appropriate at this stage.
Vendar želi poudariti, da je ta predlog ustrezna priložnost za potrditev potrebe po temeljitejšem pregledu pričujoče uredbe.
The Rapporteur would like, however, to emphasise that this proposal is the right occasion to confirm the need for a more substantial review of the Regulation.
Treba je odpraviti pomanjkljivosti in probleme pri čezmejnem izvrševanju pravnega reda za varstvo potrošnikov in izboljšati celotno delovanje mreže za sodelovanje na področju varstva potrošnikov.
In the Rapporteur's view, there is a real need to tackle the shortcomings and problems in cross-border enforcement of the consumer acquis and to improve the overall functioning of the CPC Network.
Zaveda se, da sedaj ni dovolj informacij o delovanju uredbe, ki pa bi jih dobili s podrobno analizo.
The Rapporteur is aware that for the time being there is insufficient information on the operation of the Regulation and such information should be obtained through a thorough analysis.
Komisija pripravlja drugo poročilo o uporabi uredbe o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov, ki naj bi bilo objavljeno proti koncu leta.
At the moment, the Commission is preparing the second report on the application of the CPC Regulation to be published later this year.
Komisija prav tako načrtuje zunanje ocenjevanje, ki mu bo sledilo javno posvetovanje zainteresiranih strani.
The Commission has also foreseen to carry out an external evaluation followed by a public consultation among stakeholders.
Zato se zdi smiselno počakati na rezultate tega postopka, preden bi predlagali kakšne daljnosežne spremembe uredbe o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov.
Therefore, it seems reasonable to wait for the results of this process before proposing any far-reaching modifications to the CPC Regulation.
Poročevalec želi z vključitvijo revizijske klavzule poudariti, da se mora Komisija zavezati in pospešiti revizijski postopek ter do konca leta 2014 pripraviti nov zakonodajni predlog.
By including a ‘review clause’ in the Regulation, the Rapporteur wants to underline the need for the Commission to commit itself to and speed up the review process and come up with a new legislative proposal by the end of 2014.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pri oceni področja uporabe uredbe o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov temeljito določiti pravo EU o varstvu potrošnikov.
The Rapporteur also emphasises that EU consumer law should be mapped thoroughly when assessing the scope of the CPC Regulation.
Na področje uporabe uredbe bi bilo treba gledati bolj holistično in sčasoma upoštevati vso zakonodajo EU, ki vpliva na skupne interese potrošnikov.
The scope of the Regulation should be seen more holistically, and should ultimately cover all EU legislation having an impact on consumers' collective interests.
Za zaključek bi želel poročevalec še povedati, da bi bilo treba čezmejno uveljavljanje interesov potrošnikov uvrstiti na vrh političnega seznama prednostnih nalog.
As a conclusion, the Rapporteur is of the opinion that the cross-border enforcement of consumers’ interests should be placed high on the political agenda.
Izboljšano sodelovanje med nacionalnimi izvršilnimi organi se mora razviti v učinkovitejše sredstvo v rokah evropskih potrošnikov in povečati njihovo zaupanje v notranji trg.
Improved cooperation between national enforcement authorities should develop into a more efficient remedy in the hands of European consumers and boost their confidence in the internal market.
Člen 51 – skupne seje odborov
Rule 51 – joint committee meetings
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Ilijana Ivanova (Iliana Ivanova), Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Catherine Stihler, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Iliana Ivanova, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Catherine Stihler, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
o skupni kmetijski politiki proti letu 2020: odziv na prihodnje izzive, povezane s hrano, naravnimi viri in ozemljem
the CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA........................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION..................................3
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...............................................................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Development ..........................................23
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane .......26
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 27
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ................33
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...34
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ......................................................38
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development .....................39
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU......................................................45
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE............................................................46
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Skupna kmetijska politika proti letu 2020: odziv na prihodnje izzive, povezane s hrano, naravnimi viri in ozemljem ( KOM(2010)0672 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission, ‘The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future’ ( COM(2010)0672 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy
UL L 209, 11.8.2005. ,
OJ L 209, 11.8.2005. ,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP)
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
UL L 277, 21.10.2005. ,
OJ L 277, 21.10.2005. ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta št. 2006/144/ES
– having regard to Council Decisions 2006/144/EC
UL L 55, 25.02.2006. in št. 2009/61/ES o strateških smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja
OJ L 55, 25.2.2006. and 2009/61/EC on Community strategic guidelines for rural development
UL L 30, 31.01.2009. ,
OJ L 30, 31.1.2009. ,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets
UL L 299, 16.11.2007. ,
OJ L 299, 16.11.2007. ,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers
UL L 30, 31.1.2009 in UL L 43, 18.2.2010. ,
OJ L 30, 31.1.2009 and OJ L 43, 18.2.2010. ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Sveta z dne 17. marca 2011 o skupni kmetijski politiki do leta 2020,
– having regard to the Council Presidency Conclusions of 17 March 2011 on ‘the CAP towards 2020’,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 18. marca 2010 o reformi skupne kmetijske politike leta 2013,
– having regard to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 18 March 2010 on ‘the reform of the common agricultural policy in 2013’,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z naslovom Skupna kmetijska politika proti letu 2020: odziv na prihodnje izzive, povezane s hrano, naravnimi viri in ozemljem,
– having regard to the Opinion of the Committee of the Regions, ‘The CAP until 2020 – food, natural resources and rural areas – the future challenges’,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0202/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0202/2011 ),
A. ker trajnostno, produktivno in konkurenčno evropsko kmetijstvo bistveno prispeva k uresničitvi ciljev, ki jih za skupno kmetijsko politiko določajo Pogodbe, ter ciljev strategije Evropa 2020; ker lahko pripomore tudi k odgovarjanju na nove politične izzive, kot so zanesljiva preskrba s hrano, energijo in industrijskimi surovinami, podnebne spremembe, okolje in biotska raznovrstnost, zdravje ter demografske spremembe, in ker bo bližnja reforma Skupne kmetijske politike prva, pri kateri bo v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo Evropski parlament sozakonodajelec s Svetom,
A. whereas a sustainable, productive and competitive European agricultural sector makes a vital contribution to meeting the objectives set by the Treaties for the CAP and the objectives of the EU 2020 Strategy, whereas it can also help to meet new political challenges such as security of supply of food, energy and industrial raw materials, climate change, the environment and biodiversity, health and demographic change, and whereas the forthcoming CAP reform will be the first in which the European Parliament will co-legislate with the Council, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty,
B. ker prehranska varnost ostaja glavni izziv za kmetijstvo ne samo v EU, ampak po vsem svetu, zlasti v državah v razvoju, saj se bo število svetovnega prebivalstva po napovedih Organizacije Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo do leta 2050 povečalo s 7 na 9 milijard, zaradi česar se bo morala svetovna kmetijska proizvodnja povečati za 70 %; ker bo treba pridelati več hrane ob višjih proizvodnih stroških, veliki nestabilnosti na kmetijskih trgih in vse večjem pritisku na naravne vire, kar pomeni, da bodo morali kmetje pridelati več na manj zemlje, z manj vode in manjšim vložkom energije,
B. whereas food security remains the central challenge for agriculture not only in the EU but globally, in particular in developing countries, as the world population is predicted to grow from 7 to more than 9 billion by 2050, requiring a 70% increase in global agricultural production according to the FAO; whereas more food will need to be produced against a background of higher production costs, severe volatility in agricultural markets and mounting pressure on natural resources, meaning that farmers will have to produce more using less land, less water and reduced energy inputs,
C. ker je hrana strateškega pomena in ker je najugodnejši način za zagotavljanje prehranske varnosti ohranjanje stabilnega in konkurenčnega kmetijskega sektorja; ker je pri tem bistvena močna skupna kmetijska politika, ki je nujna tudi za ohranjanje okolja, okoljsko trajnost in gospodarski razvoj podeželskih območij EU pri soočanju z nevarnostjo opuščanja zemljišč, izseljevanja s podeželja in gospodarskega nazadovanja,
C. whereas food has a strategic importance and whereas the most favourable way of ensuring food security is by maintaining a stable, competitive agricultural sector; whereas a strong CAP is central to this and to the preservation, environmental sustainability and economic development of the EU's rural areas in the face of the threat of land abandonment, rural depopulation and economic decline,
D. ker sta reforma skupne kmetijske politike iz leta 2003 in pregled kmetijske politike iz leta 2008 skušala prispevati k novi strukturi skupne kmetijske politike, ki bi bila učinkovitejša, preglednejša ter bolj tržno usmerjena; ker se mora ta proces nadaljevati in ker je treba v praksi še bolj poenostaviti vodenje instrumentov in postopkov skupne kmetijske politike, da bi razbremenili kmete in upravne organe,
D. whereas the CAP reform of 2003 and the Health Check of the Common Agricultural Policy of 2008 have sought to contribute to a new architecture for the CAP that is more effective and transparent, characterised by greater market orientation; whereas this process must be continued and the administration of CAP instruments and procedures must be significantly simplified in practice in order to reduce the burden on farmers and administrations,
E. ker je Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 8. julija 2010 o prihodnosti skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013 postavil temelje za trajnostno kmetijsko politiko, s pomočjo katere bi bili evropski proizvajalci konkurenčni na lokalnih, regionalnih, državnih in mednarodnih trgih, in ker je podprl koncept večfunkcionalnega in univerzalnega kmetijstva, razširjenega po vsej Evropi, še posebej na območjih z naravnimi omejitvami in na najbolj oddaljenih območjih, pri čemer je upošteval tudi težave majhnih kmetij,
E. whereas in its resolution of 8 July 2010 on the future of the CAP after 2013 the European Parliament laid the foundations for a sustainable agricultural policy which would allow European producers to be competitive in local, regional, national and international markets, and whereas it supported the concept of a multifunctional, broad-based agriculture spread throughout Europe, particularly in areas with natural handicaps and extremely peripheral areas, and also took into account the difficulties faced by small farms,
F. ker mora imeti skupna kmetijska politika potrebne instrumente, da bo lahko kos resnim krizam na trgu in v oskrbi ter izrednemu nihanju cen v kmetijskem sektorju; ker je treba zagotoviti, da ti instrumenti ne bodo le sodobni in učinkoviti, temveč tudi prilagodljivi, da jih bo mogoče hitro uporabiti glede na potrebe,
F. whereas the CAP must be equipped with the necessary instruments to cope with serious market and supply crises and extreme price volatility in the agricultural sector; whereas it must be ensured that these instruments are not only up to date and effective but also flexible, so that they can be implemented quickly when necessary,
G. ker je treba pozdraviti vključevanje prenovljenih in ambicioznih ciljev v skupno kmetijsko politiko, zlasti varstva potrošnikov in okolja, dobrega počutja živali ter regionalne kohezije, te visoke standarde pa je treba zagovarjati na mednarodni ravni, da bi zagotovili uspešno delovanje in konkurenčnost evropskih kmetov, ki imajo višje proizvodne stroške; ker so dolgoročna produktivnost in prehranska varnost, zlasti upoštevajoč podnebne motnje, odvisne od ustrezne skrbi za naravne vire, predvsem za prst, porabo vode in biotsko raznovrstnost,
G. whereas the incorporation of renewed and ambitious objectives into the CAP, particularly relating to consumer protection, environmental protection, animal welfare and regional cohesion, is to be welcomed and these high standards should be defended at international level so as to ensure the viability and competitiveness of European farmers, who face higher production costs; whereas long-term productivity and food security, especially in view of climatic disturbances, depends on due care for natural resources, particularly soil, water use and biodiversity,
H. ker ima kmetijstvo odločilno vlogo v boju proti podnebnim spremembam, zlasti z zmanjševanjem svojih emisij toplogrednih plinov in razvojem skladiščenja ogljika ter s proizvodnjo biomase in trajnostne energije, s čimer ustvarja dodaten vir dohodka za kmete,
H. whereas the agricultural sector has a crucial role to play in the fight against climate change, in particular by reducing its own greenhouse gas emissions, by developing carbon sequestration and through the production of biomass and sustainable energy, thereby creating an additional revenue stream for farmers’ incomes,
I. ker bi morala skupna kmetijska politika podpirati tudi posebno upravljanje kmetijskih površin z veliko biotsko raznovrstnostjo (kot so kmetijske površine velike naravne vrednosti) in kmetijskih ekosistemov na območjih Nature 2000, ter glede na to tudi prehod na prakse z manjšimi vložki (tudi ekološko kmetijstvo), trajno neobdelane pašnike ali kmetijska mokrišča,
I. whereas the CAP should also support specific management of farmland which is rich in biodiversity (such as high nature value farmland) and agro-ecosystems within Natura 2000 areas and, in this context, a transition to lower-input models (including organic farming), permanently unploughed pastures or agricultural wetlands,