natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
20. meni, da mora biti sodelovanje in tehnična pomoč pri pridobivanju in trženju surovin pomemben vidik vsake evropske ponudbe Afriki; zato poziva, da se na teh področjih zagotovi več programov usposabljanja, zlasti v okviru razvojnega sodelovanja;
Considers that cooperation and technical assistance in the extraction and marketing of raw materials should be an important feature of any European offer to Africa; calls, therefore, for more training programmes to be provided in these areas, particularly in the context of development cooperation;
24. splošneje priporoča, naj Komisija začne izmenjavo stališč na visoki ravni s kitajskimi partnerji o razvojnih politikah Kitajske in EU ter o tem, kako izboljšati vzajemno sodelovanje;
Recommends that the Commission more generally initiate a high-level exchange of views with its Chinese counterparts on the development policies followed by China and by the EU and how to improve mutual cooperation;
34. priporoča, da Komisija ustvari hitreje delujoče postopke za razvojno pomoč EU, ko gre za infrastrukturo; to bi lahko izenačilo konkurenčne pogoje s pogoji kitajskih podjetij, ki lahko računajo na zelo hiter odziv kitajske vladne pomoči ali postopke za vladna posojila;
Recommends that the Commission create faster operating EU development aid procedures when it comes to infrastructure; this could level the playing field with Chinese companies that benefit from the very rapid response of Chinese Government aid or government-backed loan procedures;
38. priznava, da je dostop do trajnostnih virov energije zelo pomemben za oba kontinenta; partnerstvo med Evropo in Afriko mora vključevati varnost preskrbe, prenos tehnologije v sektorju obnovljive energije, trajnostno ekstrakcijo virov in preglednost energetskih trgov;
Recognises that access to sustainable energy sources is highly relevant for both continents; the European-African partnership should include security of supply, technology transfer in the renewable energy sector, sustainable extraction of resources, and transparency of energy markets;
40. priporoča, naj Komisija izboljša kritje naložbenega tveganja za zasebni sektor na strateško pomembnih področjih, kot so sektor surovin in ključni infrastrukturni sektorji (tudi visokotehnološki), ki bodo pozitivno prispevali k razvoju v afriških državah; meni, da bi to lahko popolnoma izenačilo konkurenčne pogoje s kitajskimi podjetji, ki so v državni lasti, ali ki jih država podpira, ki imajo manj težav glede obvladovanja tveganj;
Recommends that the Commission improve the investment risk coverage provided by European financial institutions in order to reduce investment risks for the private sector in strategically important areas such as raw materials and key infrastructure sectors (including high tech ones) that will contribute positively to development in African countries; believes that this could certainly level the playing-field vis-à-vis State-owned/backed Chinese companies which carry less risk-management concerns;
42. izraža dvom glede preusmeritve s pomoči za projekte na proračunsko podporo in iz mednarodnih pravil dodeljevanja za standardne dokumente ponudb na državne sisteme javnih naročil, ki so jo izvedle evropske in mednarodne finančne institucije; priporoča, da Komisija ponovno oceni svojo strategijo in o tem poroča Parlamentu pred naslednjim vrhom EU-Afrika;
Is sceptical about the shift arising from project aid to budget support and from international Standard Bidding Documents Procurement Rules to Country Procurement Systems undertaken by European and international financial institutions; recommends that the Commission re-evaluate its strategy and report back to Parliament before the next EU-Africa Summit.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zaščiti pešcev in drugih izpostavljenih udeležencev v cestnem prometu
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of pedestrians and other vulnerable road users
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zaščiti pešcev in drugih izpostavljenih udeležencev v cestnem prometu( KOM(2007)0560 – C6
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of pedestrians and other vulnerable road users
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0560 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0560 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0331/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0331/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0081/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0081/2008 ),
(4) Direktiva 2003/102/ES se je izkazala za neizvedljivo pri zahtevah za drugo fazo izvajanja.
(4) Directive 2003/102/EC has been shown to be not feasible in the requirements for the second phase of implementation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 5 navedene direktive predložila nujne predloge za odpravo težav z izvedljivostjo teh zahtev in mogočo uporabo aktivnih varnostnih sistemov, hkrati pa ohranitev že zagotovljene stopnje varnosti za izpostavljene udeležence v cestnem prometu.
In this respect Article 5 of that Directive requested the Commission to make necessary proposals which would overcome problems of feasibility with these requirements and possibly make use of active safety systems, whilst ensuring there was no degradation in the safety levels provided to the vulnerable road user.
Razvijajo pa se nove tehnologije v zvezi s pasivnimi ukrepi, ki bi lahko pomagale izpolniti zahteve druge faze.
However, new technologies have been developed in the case of passive measures which could help meet the Phase II requirements.
Takšne tehnologije je treba upoštevati.
Such technologies must be taken into account.
(5) Študija, ki jo je naročila Komisija, kaže, da je mogoče zahteve za zaščito pešcev občutno izboljšati s kombinacijo pasivnih in aktivnih ukrepov, ki zagotavljajo boljšo zaščito od prejšnjih določb.
(5) A study commissioned by the Commission shows that the requirements for pedestrian protection can be significantly improved by use of a combination of passive and active measures which afford a higher level of protection than the previously existing provisions.
Opredeljen je bil zlasti aktivni varnostni sistem pomoči pri zaviranju, ki bo v kombinaciji s spremembami pasivnih varnostnih zahtev občutno izboljšal zagotovljeno zaščito.
In particular, the active safety system ‘Brake Assist’ has been identified which, in combination with changes to passive safety requirements, will significantly increase the level of protection provided.
Zato je primerno predvideti obvezno vgradnjo sistemov pomoči pri zaviranju v nova motorna vozila.
It is therefore approp ria te to provide for the obligatory installation of Brake Assist systems in new motor vehicles.
Zato je primerno predvideti obvezno vgradnjo sistemov pomoči pri zaviranju v nova motorna vozila.
Providing for the obligatory installation of Brake Assist systems in new motor vehicles is therefore approp ria te.
To pa ne bi smelo nadomestiti aktivnih varnostnih sistemov na visoki ravni, ampak bi jih moralo dopolnjevati.
This should however not replace high-level passive safety systems, but rather complement them.
Da bi se zagotovila visoka raven zaščite v vseh razmerah, obvezna vgradnja aktivnih sistemov pomoči pri zaviranju v nova vozila od leta 2009, ki jo predvideva predlog Komisije, ne bi smela nadomestiti pasivnih varnostnih sistemov na visoki ravni, ampak bi jih morala dopolnjevati.
In order to ensure a high level of safety in all circumstances, the compulsory installation of active brake assistance systems for all new vehicles as of 2009 envisaged in the Commission proposal should not replace high-level passive safety systems, but rather complement them.
Vozilom, opremljenim s sistemi za preprečevanje trčenja, ni treba izpolnjevati nekaterih zahtev, določenih v tej uredbi, ker se bodo sposobna trkom s pešci nasploh izogibati, ne pa zgolj blažiti posledic trčenj.
(6) Vehicles equipped with collision avoidance systems should not be required to fulfil certain requirements laid down in this Regulation to the extent that they will be able to avoid collisions with pedestrians rather than merely mitigating the effects of such collisions.
Vozilom, opremljenim s sistemi za preprečevanje trčenja, ni treba izpolnjevati nekaterih zahtev, določenih v tej uredbi, ker se bodo sposobna trkom s pešci nasploh izogibati, ne pa zgolj blažiti posledic trčenj.
(6) Vehicles equipped with collision avoidance systems may not be required to fulfil certain requirements laid down in this Regulation to the extent that they will be able to avoid collisions with pedestrians rather than merely mitigating the effects of such collisions.
Po oceni, da uporaba takšnih tehnologij lahko učinkovito prepreči trčenja s pešci in drugimi izpostavljenimi udeleženci v cestnem prometu, lahko Komisija predloži predloge za spremembo te uredbe, s čimer se bo dovolila uporaba teh sistemov.
After assessing that the use of such technology can effectively avoid collisions with pedestrians and other vulnerable road users, the Commission may present proposals amending this Regulation to allow for the use of such systems.
Povezano s predlogi sprememb k členu 11 in uvodni izjavi 10.
Linked to AMs on Article 11 and Recital 10.
(7) Ker se na cestah v naseljih uporablja vse več težjih vozil, je primerno, da se določbe o zaščiti pešcev uporabljajo na samo za vozila, katerih največja masa ne presega 2500 kg, ampak za določeno vmesno obdobje, tudi za vozila kategorij M1 in N1, ki presegajo to mejo.
(7) With the increasing number of heavier vehicles being used on urban roads, it is appropriate that provisions on pedestrian protection apply not only to vehicles of maximum mass not exceeding 2500kg , but also, after a certain transitional period, to vehicles of categories M 1 and N 1 exceeding that limit.
(7) Ker se na cestah v naseljih uporablja vse več težjih vozil, je primerno, da se določbe o zaščiti pešcev uporabljajo na samo za vozila, katerih največja masa ne presega 2500 kg, ampak za omejeno vmesno obdobje, tudi za vozila kategorij M1 in N1, ki presegajo to mejo.
(7) With the increasing number of heavier vehicles being used on urban roads, it is appropriate that provisions on pedestrian protection apply not only to vehicles of maximum mass not exceeding 2500kg , but also, after a limited transitional period, to vehicles of categories M 1 and N 1 exceeding that limit.
(10) Predvsem je treba Komisijo pooblastiti, da sprejme tehnične določbe za uporabo zahtev preskusa, zahtev učinkovitosti za sisteme za preprečevanje trčenja in izvedbene ukrepe, ki temeljijo na rezultatih nadzora.
(10) In particular, power should be conferred on the Commission to adopt technical provisions for the application of the test requirements , performance requirements for collision avoidance systems, and implementing measures based on results of monitoring.
Ker so navedeni ukrepi splošni in so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te uredbe z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by the addition of new non-essential elements, they should be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
(10) Predvsem je treba Komisijo pooblastiti, da sprejme tehnične določbe za uporabo zahtev preskusa in izvedbene ukrepe, ki temeljijo na rezultatih nadzora.
(10) In particular, the Commission should be empowered to adopt technical provisions for the application of the test requirements and implementing measures based on the results of monitoring.
Ker so navedeni ukrepi splošni in so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te uredbe z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Povezano s predlogi sprememb k členu 11 in uvodni izjavi 6.
Linked to AMs on Article 11 and Recital 6.
Zahteve glede učinkovitosti za sisteme za preprečevanje trčenja se ne bi smele obravnavati s postopkom komitologije.
Performance requirements for collision avoidance systems should not be dealt by comitology procedure.
Člen 2 – odstavek 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Oddelka 2 in 3 Priloge I se ne uporabljata za vozila kategorije N1, kadar je položaj voznika „točka R“ bodisi pred prvo osjo bodisi manj kot 1000 mm longitudinalno za vzdolžno ravnino vozila.
Sections 2 and 3 of Annex I shall not apply to vehicles of category N 1 where the driver position ‘R-point’ is either forward of the front axle or longitudinally rearwards of the front axle transverse centreline by less than 1000 mm .
Oddelka 2 in 3 Priloge I se ne uporabljata za:
Sections 2 and 3 of Annex I shall not apply to:
(a) vozila kategorije N1,
(a) vehicles of category N 1 ,
(b) vozila kategorije M1, izpeljana iz N1, katerih največja masa ne presega 2.500 kg,
(b) vehicles of category M 1 derived from N 1 and of maximum mass exceeding 2500 kg,
kadar je položaj voznika „točka R“ bodisi pred prvo osjo bodisi manj kot 1050+/-50 mm longitudinalno za vzdolžno ravnino vozila.
where the driver position ‘R-point’ is either forward of the front axle or longitudinally rearwards of the front axle transverse centreline by less than 1050 +/- 50 mm.
V besedilo globalnega tehničnega predpisa je bila v Ženevi vstavljena razdalja 1000 mm in ta številka je bila prenesena v predlog Komisije.
A distance of 1000 mm has been inserted in the GTR (Global Technical Regulation) text in Geneva and this figure is transposed into the Commission proposal.
Zaradi tega bi se lahko podobna vozila s ploskim sprednjim delom obravnavala različno, kar bi vodilo do izkrivljanja trga.
This may cause similar flat fronted vehicles to be treated differently, leading to market distortion.
Vozila s ploskim sprednjim delom kategorije M1 nad 2,5 tonama so lahko enaka kot primerljiva vozila kategorije N1, zato morajo biti enako obravnavana.
Flat-front M1 vehicles above 2.5 tonnes may be the same vehicles as comparable N1 vehicles and thus should be treated similarly.
Zmanjšana razdalja med točko R in prednjo osjo bo zmanjšala prostor v kabini ter s tem udobje voznika, zato se omogoči toleranca.
Reducing the distance between the R-point and the front axle will reduce the space in the cab and hence the comfort of the driver, therefore a tolerance has been provided.
Člen 3 – točka 6 a (novo)
Article 3 – point 6 a (new)
(6 a) „vozila kategorije M1, izpeljana iz kategorije N1“ pomenijo vozila kategorije M1, katerih največja masa presega 2.500 kg, ki so v splošni konstrukciji in obliki v delu pred A-stebrički enaka ustreznemu vozilu kategorije N1.
(6 a) 'vehicles of category M 1 derived from N 1 ' means those vehicles of M 1 category and of maximum mass exceeding 2500 kg which, forward of the A-pillars, have the same general structure and shape as a pre-existing N 1 category vehicle;
Povezano s predlogom spremembe člena 2(2).
Linked to AM on Article 2, Para 2.
Zaradi spremembe člena 2(2) je treba opredeliti „vozila kategorije M1, izpeljana iz kategorije N1“.
Change in Article 2, 2 makes it necessary to define 'vehicles of category M1 derived from N1'.
Člen 9 – odstavek 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Nacionalni organi z začetkom veljavnosti [DATUM triintrideset mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe] iz razlogov, povezanih z zaščito pešcev, štejejo certifikat o skladnosti za neveljaven za namen člena [26] Direktive […/…/ES ] v primeru novih vozil kategorije M1, ali N1, izpeljanih iz M1, katerih največja masa ne presega 2.500 kg, ki niso skladna s tehničnimi določbami iz oddelka 4 Priloge I, in prepovejo registracijo, prodajo ali začetek uporabe vozil.
With effect from [DATE thirty-three months following entry into force of this Regulation] , in the case of new vehicles of category M 1 , or N 1 derived from M 1 , and of maximum mass not exceeding 2500 kg, which do not comply with the technical provisions set out in Section 4 of Annex I, national authorities shall, on grounds related to pedestrian protection, consider the certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of Article [ 26 ] of Directive […/…/EC] , and shall prohibit the registration, sale and entry into service of such vehicles.
Nacionalni organi z začetkom veljavnosti ...* iz razlogov, povezanih z zaščito pešcev, štejejo certifikat o skladnosti za neveljaven za namen člena 26 Direktive 2007/46/ES v primeru novih vozil in prepovejo registracijo, prodajo ali začetek uporabe naslednjih novih vozil:
With effect from ...* , national authorities shall, on grounds related to pedestrian protection, consider the certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of Article 26 of Directive 2007/46 / EC , and shall prohibit the registration, sale and entry into service of the following new vehicles:
(a) vozil kategorije M1,
(a) vehicles of category M 1,
(b) vozil kategorije N1, izpeljanih iz M1, katerih največja masa ne presega 2.500 kg, ki niso skladna s tehničnimi določbami iz oddelka 4 Priloge I.
(b) vehicles of category N 1 derived from M 1 , and of maximum mass not exceeding 2500 kg, which do not comply with the technical provisions set out in Section 4 of Annex I.
* 24 mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe .
* 24 months following entry into force of this Regulation.
Člen 9 – odstavek 3 – uvodni del
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Nacionalni organi z začetkom veljavnosti [ DATUM šestinpetdeset mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe] iz razlogov, povezanih z zaščito pešcev, zavrnejo podelitev ES-homologacije ali nacionalne homologacije v zvezi z naslednjimi novimi tipi vozil:
With effect from [DATE fifty-six months following entry into force of this Regulation] , national authorities shall refuse, on grounds relating to pedestrian protection, to grant EC type-approval or national type-approval, in respect of any of the following new vehicle types:
Nacionalni organi z začetkom veljavnosti ... * iz razlogov, povezanih z zaščito pešcev, zavrnejo podelitev ES-homologacije ali nacionalne homologacije v zvezi z naslednjimi novimi tipi vozil:
With effect from ...* , national authorities shall refuse, on grounds relating to pedestrian protection, to grant EC type-approval or national type-approval, in respect of any of the following new vehicle types:
* 48 mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe .
* 48 months following entry into force of this Regulation.
Člen 9 – odstavek 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Nacionalni organi z začetkom veljavnosti [DATUM šestdeset mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe ] iz razlogov, povezanih z zaščito pešcev, štejejo certifikat o skladnosti za neveljaven za namen člena [ 26 ] Direktive […/…/ES] v primeru novih vozil kategorije M1, ali N1, izpeljanih iz M1, katerih največja masa ne presega 2.500 kg, ki niso skladna s tehničnimi določbami iz oddelkov 2 in 4 ali oddelkov 3 in 4 Priloge I, in prepovejo registracijo, prodajo ali začetek uporabe vozil.
With effect from [DATE sixty months following entry into force of this Regulation] , in the case of new vehicles of category M 1 , or N 1 derived from M 1 , and of maximum mass not exceeding 2500kg, which do not comply with the technical provisions set out in Sections 2 and 4 or Sections 3 and 4 of Annex I , national authorities shall, on grounds related to pedestrian protection, consider the certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of Article [ 26 ] of Directive […/…/EC] , and shall prohibit the registration, sale and entry into service of such vehicles.
Nacionalni organi z začetkom veljavnosti ...* iz razlogov, povezanih z zaščito pešcev, štejejo certifikat o skladnosti za neveljaven za namen člena 26 Direktive 2007/46/ES v primeru novih vozil kategorije M1, ali N1, izpeljanih iz M1, katerih največja masa ne presega 2.500 kg, ki niso skladna s tehničnimi določbami iz oddelka 2 ali oddelka 3 Priloge I, in prepovejo registracijo, prodajo ali začetek uporabe vozil.
With effect from ...* , in the case of new vehicles of category M 1 , or N 1 derived from M 1 , and of maximum mass not exceeding 2 500kg, which do not comply with the technical provisions set out in Section 2 or Section 3 of Annex I , national authorities shall, on grounds related to pedestrian protection, consider the certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of Article 26 of Directive 2007/46/EC , and shall prohibit the registration, sale and entry into service of such vehicles.
* 31. decembra 2012 .
* 31 December 2012 .
Z direktivo 2003/102 je 31. december 2012 določen kot rok za nova vozila, ki ne ustrezajo pasivnim varnostnim zahtevam prve faze (kot določeno v oddelku 3.1 Priloge I direktive).
Directive 2003/102 foresees from 31 December 2012 as deadline for new vehicles which do not meet the passive safety requirements of Phase I (as defined in section 3.1 of Annex I of the directive).
Zahteve oddelka 2 Priloge I te uredbe so popolnoma enake.
The requirements of Section 2 of Annex I of this proposed regulation are identical.
Ta rok se mora ohraniti.
The same deadline should be maintained.
Časovni razpored za sistem pomoči pri zaviranju (oddelek 4 Priloge I) obravnava člen 9, odstavki 1, 2 in 6.
BAS timetables (section 4 of Annex I) are dealt in Article 9, Paragraph 1, 2 and 6.
Člen 9 – odstavek 5
Article 9 – paragraph 5
Nacionalni organi z začetkom veljavnosti [DATUM oseminsedemdeset mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe] iz razlogov, povezanih z zaščito pešcev, zavrnejo podelitev ES-homologacije ali nacionalne homologacije vozila, če tip vozila ni skladen s tehničnimi določbami iz oddelkov 3 in 4 Priloge I.
With effect from [DATE seventy-eight months following entry into force of this Regulation] , in the case of a new vehicle type which does not comply with the technical provisions set out in Sections 3 and 4 of Annex I, national authorities shall refuse, on grounds relating to pedestrian protection, to grant EC type-approval or national type-approval.
Nacionalni organi z začetkom veljavnosti ...* iz razlogov, povezanih z zaščito pešcev, zavrnejo podelitev ES-homologacije ali nacionalne homologacije vozila, če tip vozila ni skladen s tehničnimi določbami iz oddelka 3 Priloge I.
With effect from ...* , in the case of a new vehicle type which does not comply with the technical provisions set out in Section 3 of Annex I, national authorities shall refuse, on grounds relating to pedestrian protection, to grant EC type-approval or national type-approval.
* 72 mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe .
* 72 months following entry into force of this Regulation.
Krajši prehodni čas za nove tipe vozil kategorije M1 nad 2,5 t in kategorije N1 je povezan s predlaganim zmanjšanjem števila novih vozil te kategorije.
Reduction of lead-time for new types of vehicles of category M1 above 2,5 t and N1 is connected with the proposed reduction of new vehicles of the same category.
Priporočen čas med rokoma je 5 let.
5 years between the two deadlines is advisable.
Člen 9 – odstavek 6 – točka (a)
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point (a)
(a) kategoriji M1 ali N1, ki niso skladna s tehničnimi določbami iz oddelka 4 Priloge I;
(a) categories M 1 or N 1 which do not comply with the technical provisions set out in Section 4 of Annex I;
(a) kategorije N1, ki niso skladna s tehničnimi določbami iz oddelka 4 Priloge I;
(a) category N 1 which do not comply with the technical provisions set out in Section 4 of Annex I;
Vsa nova vozila kategorije M1 že obravnava člen 9, odstavek 2.
All new M1vehicles are already covered in Article 9, Paragraph 2.
Člen 9 – odstavek 6 – točka (b)
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – point (b)