natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
18. prav tako poudarja, da kohezijska politika ne more biti gonilna sila ali instrument za reševanje sektorskih vprašanj, kot so politike za raziskave in razvoj, industrijske inovacije in boj proti podnebnim spremembam, saj bi to pomenilo odmik od prvotnega cilja kohezijske politike in omejilo njeno vlogo pri spodbujanju razvojnih možnosti regij, ki so bistvene za približevanje najbolj prikrajšanih regij najrazvitejšim regijam;
Stresses, likewise, that cohesion policy cannot become a vehicle or instrument serving sectoral issues such as policies on research and development, industrial innovation and the fight against climate change, as this would mean diluting its primary objective and placing constraints on its use to promote regions’ development potential, which is essential in order to bring the most disadvantaged regions closer to the most developed regions;
21. meni tudi, da je kohezijska politika odgovorna za nujno premostitev vrzeli in zmanjševanje ozkih grl v osrednjem vseevropskem omrežju pomembnih evropskih prometnih poti, zlasti mejnih regijah, ki so bile pri tem doslej močno zapostavljene;
Also considers that cohesion policy has a responsibility to do what is needed to fill gaps and remove bottlenecks in a core TEN network of main routes of European significance, particularly in the border regions which have until now been badly neglected in this regard;
23. spodbuja uporabo načela enakega prometa z uporabo sredstev Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in nacionalnih virov, saj ustvarjajo taki ukrepi dodano vrednost v smislu krepitve regionalne konvergence, teritorialne kohezije in razvojnih dejavnosti, kot je turizem, kar je pomembno za oddaljene, npr. otoške regije;
Encourages the application of the ‘transport equivalent’ principle using ERDF resources and also national resources, given the added value of such measures in strengthening regional convergence, territorial cohesion and development activities such as tourism, which are important for remote regions, such as island regions;
Ciljne strukture in okvir načrtovanja programov
System of objectives and framework for programme planning
26. poudarja, da lahko naložbe v inovacije in izobraževanje spodbujajo rast; vendar poudarja, da morajo primerna infrastruktura (promet, širokopasovni internet, energija) in ustrezne institucije (uravnotežena mešanica javnih naložb in fiskalne konsolidacije pri makroekonomskih ukrepih, storitve e-uprave, čezmejno učenje) nuditi učinkovito podporo;
Emphasises that investment in innovation and education can promote growth; points out, however, that the relevant infrastructure (transport, broadband internet, energy) and appropriate institutions (a balanced mix of public investment and fiscal policy consolidation with macro-economic measures, e-government services and cross-border learning) must provide effective support;
29. meni, da je Evropski socialni sklad bistvenega pomena za kohezijsko politiko in da lahko poveča tudi njen prispevek k doseganju ciljev strategije EU 2020, tudi na področju trajnostne rasti, kjer lahko mala in srednja podjetja podpira pri ustvarjanju zelenih delovnih mest;
Considers that the ESF is of crucial importance to cohesion policy and has the potential to enhance the latter’s contribution towards meeting the Europe 2020 objectives, including in the area of sustainable growth through the provision of support to SMEs for the creation of green jobs;
33. poziva, naj se za regije, ki tudi v več programskih obdobjih kljub največji podpori niso mogle doseči omembe vrednega izboljšanja svojega gospodarskega, socialnega in okoljskega položaja, omejijo obdobja upravičenosti;
Calls for a limit to be placed on eligibility periods for regions which prove unable to show any significant improvements in their economic, social and environmental situation after several programming periods, despite maximum support;
37. je trdno prepričan, da je treba cilj 3 (evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje) na vseh notranjih mejah EU in v njegovih treh razsežnostih (čezmejno, medregionalno in čeznacionalno sodelovanje) okrepiti, in zahteva, naj se ustrezni delež strukturnih skladov poviša na 7 %; zahteva, naj se sredstva za vsak posamezen program teritorialnega sodelovanja dodeljujejo na podlagi usklajenih meril, da bi se strateško in celostno odzvali na potrebe in posebnosti vsakega zadevnega geografskega ozemlja in območja; poudarja vlogo obmejnih regij za dosego ciljev strategije Evropa 2020; meni, da je treba izboljšati usklajenost vseevropskih omrežij, zlasti prometnih in energetskih, ter čezmejne infrastrukture, da se povečajo subvencije za omrežja, ki so v skladu z evropskimi prednostnimi nalogami, in zahteva ustrezno povečanje sredstev za vse obmejne regije; poziva k poenostavitvi izvedbenih predpisov, ki veljajo za programe v okviru cilja 3, na podlagi načela sorazmernosti, ter k pripravi skupnih pravil za upravičenost, kar so pogoji za povečanje učinkovitosti in prepoznavnosti teh programov; poudarja, da je treba vključevati tiste, ki sprejemajo odločitve na lokalni ravni, saj lahko programi zaživijo samo ob tem zagotovilu;
Takes the unequivocal view that efforts under Objective 3 (European Territorial Cooperation) need to be stepped up at all EU internal borders and at all three levels of such cooperation (cross-border, inter-regional and trans-national), and calls for the relevant share of structural funds to be increased to 7%; calls for the allocation of funding for each territorial cooperation programme to be based on harmonised criteria, in order to provide a strategic and integrated response to the needs and specificities of each geographical territory and area concerned; stresses the importance of the border regions in terms of achievement of the Europe 2020 objectives; considers that there is a need to improve coordination between the Trans-European Networks, particularly those concerned with transport and energy, and cross-border infrastructure, and to increase the subsidies for those networks in line with European priorities, and calls for a corresponding increase in funding for all border regions; calls for simplification of the implementing rules governing Objective 3 programmes, based on the principle of proportionality, as well as for the development of a common set of eligibility rules, all of which are preconditions for these programmes becoming more effective and more visible; stresses the need for local decision-makers to be closely involved, since programmes can be fleshed out only if this is guaranteed;
40. vztraja, da mora Evropski socialni sklad ostati del kohezijske politike, saj je samo tako mogoče razviti in izvajati celovite strategije za reševanje gospodarskih in družbenih težav;
Insists that the European Social Fund must remain part of cohesion policy, as only in this way can integrated strategies for resolving economic and social problems be developed and implemented;
44. vztraja, da Evropski socialni sklad nudi bistveno pomoč politikam na trgu dela, kot so preventivna in lokalna politika ter politika, ki pomaga mladim pri vstopu na trg dela in se bori proti brezposelnosti; poudarja, da bi morale države članice Evropski socialni sklad uporabiti za naložbe v nove veščine, izobraževanje (tudi zgodnje učenje), vseživljenjsko učenje, ponovno usposabljanje in prekvalifikacije, ter opozarja, da ima Evropski socialni sklad pomembno vlogo pri krepitvi vseh razsežnosti socialne vključenosti, tudi za najbolj prikrajšane in ranljive skupine;
Stresses the fact that the ESF provides crucial support for employment market policies such as preventive and local policies as well as those aimed at helping young people to enter the labour market and at combating unemployment; highlights the fact that the Member States should use the ESF for investment in new skills, education (including early childhood education), lifelong learning, retraining and occupational redeployment activities, and stresses that the fund plays an important part in boosting all dimensions of social inclusion, including for the most disadvantaged and vulnerable groups;
47. poudarja, da so neprecenljive izkušnje pobude Skupnosti EQUAL pomembne tudi danes, predvsem kar zadeva združevanje lokalnih in regionalnih ukrepov ter vseevropske izmenjave najboljše prakse;
Underlines the fact that the invaluable experience gained with the Community EQUAL initiative is still relevant today, especially as regards combining local and regional measures and the EU-wide exchange of best practices;
50. predlaga, naj se raziskovalne in razvojne politike teritorializirajo; zato poudarja pomen prilagajanja kohezijske politike ter raziskovalnih in inovacijskih politik posebnim potrebam ozemelj, saj je glede na nezmožnost uporabe iste razvojne strategije v vseh regijah ključno boljše vključevanje regionalnih in lokalnih organov v oblikovanje in izvajanje regionalnih razvojnih skladov ter raziskovalnih in inovacijskih programov;
Proposes that research and development policies be territorialised; stresses, therefore, the importance of adapting cohesion policy and research and innovation policies to the specific needs of the territories, since closer involvement of regional and local authorities in the design and implementation of the regional development funds and research and innovation programmes is of crucial importance in view of the impossibility of applying the same development strategy in all regions;
52. poziva Svet in Parlament, naj sprejmeta nov skupni strateški okvir po rednem zakonodajnem postopku na podlagi člena 177 PDEU;
Calls for a new Common Strategic Framework to be adopted by the Council and the Parliament under the ordinary legislative procedure, on the basis of Article 177 of the TFEU;
55. priporoča, da se Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji racionalizira in vključi v strukturne sklade, ne da bi se zmanjšal skupni obseg sredstev v postavki za kohezijsko politiko v proračunu EU;
Recommends that the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund be streamlined and integrated with the Structural Funds without this entailing a decrease in the overall size of the Cohesion heading within the EU budget;
58. podpira ohranitev operativnih programov kot najpomembnejšega orodja za izvajanje strateških dokumentov v konkretne naložbene prednostne naloge; pri tem zahteva določitev jasnih in merljivih ciljev;
Supports retention of the operational programmes as the most important tool for implementation of the strategy papers in terms of concrete investment priorities; calls for clear and measurable objectives to be set in this respect;
61. podpira sistem tematskih prednostnih nalog, ki ga je predlagala Komisija; poudarja, da nižja kot je stopnja razvoja držav članic ali regij, širše bi moral biti zasnovan seznam prednostnih nalog, pri čemer je treba upoštevati posebne regionalne razvojne potrebe in zagotoviti, da se ta tematski pristop k načrtovanju strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov ne izvaja v škodo celostnega lokalnega pristopa;
Supports the system of thematic priorities that the Commission is proposing; points out that, the lower the level of development in a Member State or region, the more wide-ranging the list of priorities needs to be, while specific regional development needs have to be taken into account and it has to be ensured that this thematic approach for structural and cohesion fund programming cannot be implemented to the detriment of the integrated place-based approach;
63. zahteva, naj se preprečijo zamude pri začetku izvajanja programov in načelno pospešijo postopki odločanja in ocenjevanja; poudarja, da je to izredno pomembno predvsem za mala in srednja podjetja; zahteva tudi, naj se izboljša tehnična oprema, ki je na voljo ustreznim upravnim organom, ki morajo biti tesneje povezani, naj se zmanjšajo zahteve glede objave, roki za razpise in oddajo pa občutno skrajšajo; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni, ali je mogoče vzpostaviti pilotna področja, da se preskusijo nove ureditve v manjšem obsegu, preden bi začele veljati za vse ostale regije, s čimer bi ugotovili možne težave pri izvajanju;
Calls for delays in launching programmes to be avoided and for decision-making and evaluation processes to be speeded up as a matter of principle; stresses that this is extremely important for small and medium-sized undertakings in particular; calls, too, for the technical equipment available to the relevant administrative authorities to be improved and for those authorities to be more closely inter-connected, for publication requirements to be reduced, and for deadlines for calls for tender and applications to be significantly shortened; asks the Commission to evaluate whether pilot areas could be established in order to test out new regulations on smaller scale before they become applicable to the rest of the regions, in order to identify possible implementation problems;
Spodbude, pogoji, usmerjenost v rezultate, sofinanciranje in možnosti financiranja
Incentives, conditionality, result -orientation , co-financing and financing options
65. meni, da novi pogoji udeleženim akterjem ne smejo nalagati dodatnih upravnih bremen; spodbuja razvoj doslednih in standardnih sistemov pogojevanja za ESRR in ESS, ki jih bo mogoče objektivno oceniti;
Takes the view that any new conditionality must not result in extra administration burdens for the actors involved; encourages the development of consistent, standard systems of conditionality for both the ERDF and ESF that are objectively assessable;
68. meni, da morajo kazalniki za določanje regionalnih subvencij iz strukturnih skladov in kohezijskega sklada temeljiti na najnovejših statističnih podatkih Eurostata, da bi v celoti upoštevali ekonomski in socialni učinek krize na regije;
Considers that the indicators determining regional subsidies from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund must be based on Eurostat’s most recent statistical data, so as to take full account of the economic and social impact of the crisis on the regions;
70. meni, da je javno in zasebno sofinanciranje eno temeljnih načel kohezijske politike; zahteva pregled zgornje meje sredstev EU, ki bi morala bolj upoštevati regionalne stopnje razvoja, evropsko dodano vrednost in vrste financiranih ukrepov ter se ustrezno zvišati ali znižati;
Regards public and private co-financing as one of the basic principles of cohesion policy; calls for a review of the percentage ceiling for EU funding – which should take more account of regional development levels, European added value and the types of measure funded and should be raised or lowered accordingly;
75. meni, da mora EIB okrepiti vlogo pri financiranju infrastrukture vseevropskih omrežij; zahteva večji poudarek na samostojnih javno-zasebnih partnerstev; meni, da ima Evropski parlament pri tem načeloma veliko odgovornost za zagotovitev preglednosti ter v zvezi z odločanjem in nadzorom;
Considers that the EIB must assume a stronger role in the financing of TEN infrastructure; calls for more emphasis to be placed on self-supporting public-private partnerships; considers, as a matter of principle, that the European Parliament has a major responsibility in this regard for ensuring transparency, as well as in relation to decision-making and supervision;
Proračun, finančni postopki, krčenje birokracije, proračunska disciplina in finančni nadzor
Budget, financial processes , reducing red tape, budgetary discipline and financial control
82. meni, da bo kohezijska politika po letu 2013 še bolj prispevala k nadaljnjemu in trajnostnemu razvoju regij EU in da je odločilna za medsektorsko izvajanje strategije Evropa 2020, zato zahteva vsaj enako dodelitev proračunskih sredstev;
Regards post-2013 cohesion policy as being capable of making an even greater contribution to further and sustainable development of the EU regions and as the decisive policy for cross-sectoral implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy, and therefore calls for it to be allocated at least the same budget appropriations;
89. poziva k poenostavitvi sistema inšpekcijskih pregledov in zmanjšanju njihovega števila ter k pojasnitvi ustrezne odgovornosti Komisije in držav članic; poziva k uporabi postopka inšpekcijskih pregledov na eni ravni, po katerem bi države članice pregledovale projekte, Komisija pa sisteme inšpekcijskih pregledov v državah članicah;
Calls for the inspection system to be simplified and the number of inspection levels to be reduced and for the respective responsibilities of the Commission and Member States to be clarified; calls for the use of a single-level inspection procedure, under which Member States would inspect projects and the Commission would inspect the Member States’ inspection systems;
92. poziva Komisijo, naj vodi javno letno evidenco kršitev za pomanjkljivo in/ali zapoznelo spoštovanje obveznosti poročanja in objavljanja ter za nepravilnosti, zlorabe in goljufije pri uporabi strukturnih skladov; poziva, naj bodo te informacije razčlenjene po državah članicah in skladih;
Calls on the Commission to maintain an annual public ‘failure scoreboard’ of inadequate and/or late execution of reporting and disclosure requirements and of irregularities, abuse and fraud in the use of monies from the Structural Funds; calls for this information to be broken down by Member State and by fund;
98. meni, da je po izplačilu sredstev EU za projekte sicer potrebno povračilo izdatkov, vendar banke in druge finančne inštitucije upravičencev ne bi smele biti dodatno obremenjevati z obrestnimi merami, ki ne odražajo majhnega dejavnika tveganja takih posojil;
Considers that, while reimbursement should arrive after EU funding has paid out for projects, no extra burdens should be placed on the beneficiaries, in the form of interest rates that do not reflect the low risk factor of such loans, by banks or other financial institutions;
102. podpira predlog Komisije, naj se v nekaterih situacijah razen za prvo leto financiranja in čezmejne programe dosledno uporabljata pravili N+2 in N+3, po možnosti na ravni dodelitve sredstev državam članicam, da se omogoči večja prožnost, ter da mora kakršno koli odstopanje od pravila samodejnega preklica dodelitve odražati le prilagoditev dodatnemu upravnemu bremenu, povezanemu z novimi določbami o strateškem načrtovanju, usmerjenosti v rezultate in predhodni pogojenosti; pri čezmejnih programih zagovarja celo pravilo N+3, da se upoštevajo počasnejši upravni postopki zaradi jezikovnih in kulturnih izzivov; meni, da to zagotavlja ravnotežje med visokokakovostnimi naložbami ter gladkim in hitrim izvajanjem programov;
Supports the Commission's proposal that the N+2 and N+3 rules should, in certain situations, be applied systematically, possibly at the level of Member States’ allocations, in order to provide greater flexibility, except in the first year of funding and except for cross-border programmes, and that any other derogations from the automatic decommitment rule should only reflect an adaptation to the administrative burdens imposed by new provisions related to strategic programming, results-based orientation and ex ante conditionality; supports, indeed, the application of an N+3 rule in the case of cross-border programmes, in order to take account of the slower administrative processes resulting from the linguistic and cultural challenges they face; considers this will guarantee that a balance is struck between high-quality investment and smooth and speedy programme implementation;
Sosedska in širitvena politika
Neighbourhood and enlargement policies
104. poudarja tudi pomen širitvenega procesa EU za kohezijo, pri katerem instrument za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) kandidatkam za pristop pomaga pri vsebinskih in organizacijskih pripravah na izvajanje kohezijske politike; opozarja na težave z izvajanjem v državah članicah; opozarja na prvotne cilje instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, zlasti na financiranje krepitve zmogljivosti in vzpostavljanja institucij ter podpiranje priprav držav kandidatk na izvajanje kohezijske politike Skupnosti, da bi bile pripravljene na celovito izvajanje pravnega reda Skupnosti v času pristopa; poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli težave pri sedanjem delovanju instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč;
Stresses, too, the relevance of the EU enlargement process for cohesion, as part of which the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) helps the candidate countries to make substantive and organisational preparations for implementing cohesion policy; draws the attention to the implementation problems in the Member States; recalls the original aims of the IPA instrument, in particular those of financing capacity building and institution-building and supporting the candidate countries’ preparations for the implementation of the Community's cohesion policy in order to prepare them for full implementation of the Community acquis at the time of accession; calls on the Commission to identify the problems in the current functioning of the IPA instrument;
Evropska mednarodna skupnost bo glede na globalne napovedi rasti in prebivalstva izgubila na pomenu.
Forecasts of global growth and population trends suggest that the European community of States will decline in significance.
Danes živi v EU-27 še približno 8 % svetovnega prebivalstva, leta 2050 pa jih bo le še 5 %.
Whereas at present the EU-27 are still home to some 8% of the global population, by 2050 this figure will have fallen to 5%.
Gospodarska teža bo zaradi rasti zlasti na Kitajskem in v pomembnih hitro razvijajočih se državah padla z današnjih 20 % na tedaj približno 12 %.
Particularly because of growth in China and in important emerging countries, the EU’s share in the global economy will decline from 20% to around 12% over the same period.
Viri: Objavi Združenih narodov 2006 in MDS 2009.
Sources: publications of the United Nations 2006 and the IMF 2009.
Če se evropska mednarodna skupnost želi uveljaviti v ekonomski in politični konkurenci in če naj zaradi te sorazmerne izgube pomembnosti ne sledi zmanjšanje blagostanja, mora Skupnost pri pomembnih vprašanjih, povezanih z zagotavljanjem prihodnosti, tesneje držati skupaj.
If the European community of States wishes to compete economically and politically, and if this relative decline in significance is not to be accompanied by a loss of prosperity, the community must act in a more concerted manner with regard to vital issues on which it needs to secure its future.
To velja za zunanjo in varnostno politiko, pa tudi za odločilna vprašanja, povezana z notranjim trgom, raziskavami, energetsko oskrbo in dobavo naravnih virov.
This applies to foreign and security policy, just as it does to decisive issues regarding the internal market, research, energy supply and guaranteed supplies of raw materials.
Skupnost se mora še močneje kot doslej posvetiti hitremu razvoju obnovljivih virov energije in svoji zmožnosti shranjevanja.
Even more than hitherto, the community must devote itself to the rapid development of renewable energy and ways of storing it.
Vloga regij in dodana vrednost kohezijske politike
The role of the regions and the added value of cohesion policy
Kohezijska in strukturna politika bosta imeli pri vprašanjih, povezanih s prihodnjo konkurenčnostjo, ključno vlogo.
Cohesion policy and structural policy have a key role to play in ensuring future competitiveness.
Evropske regije in mesta ter njihova podjetja so že zelo močno vpeti v svetovno gospodarstvo, kar je povezano z evropsko zgodovino posameznih nacionalnih držav.
Europe’s regions and towns and their undertakings already have very strong links with the rest of the global economy, for reasons associated with the European history of the individual nation states.
Ob tem je evropska ekonomska struktura veliko bolj zapletena od azijskih ali severnoameriških.
Thus Europe’s economic system is substantially more complex than its counterparts in Asia or North America.
Več kot polovica globalnih povezav med večnacionalnimi podjetji in njihovimi hčerinskimi podjetji izvira iz EU.
More than half of global ties between multinational corporations and their subsidiaries originate in the EU.
Kohezijska politika se mora te še obstoječe prednosti mednarodnega povezovanja močneje oprijeti in na mednarodne rastoče trge privesti tudi več malih in srednjih podjetij.
Cohesion policy must take greater advantage of this surviving advantage of international networking and encourage more SMEs to become involved in international growth markets.