natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Največ dva člana in namestnika imenuje generalni direktor pristojnega generalnega direktorata Komisije, in sicer izmed uradnikov Komisije.
A maximum of two members and two alternates shall be designated by the Director General of the Commission Directorate-General responsible from among Commission officials.
Sestankov Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa se lahko udeležujejo zaniteresirani poslanci ali ustrezno osebje Evropskega parlamenta, strokovnjaki iz držav članic in uradniki Komisije , na stroške njihovih administracij ali institucij .
I nterested Members or relevant staff of the European Parliament, experts from Member States and Commission officials directly involved in the development of the SIS II projects may attend GPMB meetings at the expense of their respective administration or institution.
V poslovniku je določeno, da lahko Odbor za upravljanje globalnega programa, sicer na stroške zadevnih administracij, institucij ali podjetij, k sodelovanju na svojih sejah povabi še druge strokovnjake.
The GPMB may invite other experts to participate in GPMB meetings as defined in the terms of reference, at the expense of their respective administration, institution or company.
Člen 17 a – odstavek 5
Article 17 a – paragraph 5
Odbor za globalno upravljanje programa določi svoje pristojnosti in naloge.
The GPMB shall draw up its own terms of reference.
Te začnejo veljati potem, ko generalni direktor pristojnega generalnega direktorata Komisije da pozitivno mnenje.
They shall take effect after a favourable opinion has been given by the Director General of the responsible Directorate-General of the Commission.
Pristojnosti in naloge Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa vključujejo zahtevo po objavljanju rednih poročil in zagotavljanju, da se ta poročila predložijo Evropskemu parlamentu, da se zagotovi popoln parlamentarni nadzor in pregled.
The terms of reference of the GPMB shall include a requirement to publish regular reports and to make those reports available to the European Parliament in order to ensure full parliamentary scrutiny and oversight.
Člen 17 a – odstavek 6
Article 17 a – paragraph 6
Brez poseganja v člen 15(2) se upravni in potni stroški, ki nastanejo zaradi dejavnosti Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa, krijejo iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije, če se ne krijejo iz drugih virov.
Without prejudice to Article 15(2), the administrative costs and travel expenses arising from the activities of the GPMB shall be borne by the general budget of the European Union, to the extent that they are not reimbursed from other sources.
Za povračilo potnih stroškov strokovnjakov v Odboru za globalno upravljanje programa, ki jih imenujejo države članice v okviru Sveta, in strokovnjakov, povabljenih v skladu z odstavkom 3 tega člena, ki nastanejo pri delu Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa, se uporabljajo ‚Predpisi o nadomestilih za zunanje strokovnjake, ki jih Komisija povabi k sodelovanju‘ Komisije.
As regards travel expenses of the experts in the GPMB designated by the Member States acting within the Council and experts invited pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article which arise in connection with the work of the GPMB, the Commission's 'Rules on the reimbursement of expenses incurred by people from outside the Commission invited to attend meetings in an expert capacity' shall apply.
Sredstva, potrebna za kritje stroškov, nastalih zaradi sestankov Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa, se namenijo iz odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, trenutno zagotovljenih s finančnim načrtovanjem za obdobje 2010–2013 za drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II).
The necessary appropriations to cover the cost arising from the meetings of the GPMB shall come from the appropriations currently provided for in the Financial Programming 2010-2013 for the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II).
Ta uredba začne veljati tretji dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Veljati preneha z dnem, ki ga določi Svet v skladu s členom 55(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006 , v vsakem primeru pa najpozneje 31. decembra 2013 .
It shall expire on a date to be fixed by the Council, acting in accordance with Article 55(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 , and in any event no later than 31 December 2013 .
Svet in Evropski parlament sta se o določbah o ustanovitvi, delovanju in uporabi sistema SIS II dogovorila leta 2006 v postopku soodločanja in na prvi obravnavi, da bi se izognili nadaljnjim zaostankom.
Provisions on the establishment, operation and use of the SIS II were agreed in 2006, between the Council and the European Parliament, under co-decision, on a first reading in order to avoid anymore delays.
Ti pravni instrumenti se za države članice, ki sodelujejo v SIS 1+, začnejo uporabljati z dnem, ki ga v Svetu soglasno določijo člani, predstavniki vlad držav članic, ki sodelujejo v SIS 1+.
On these legal instruments is foreseen that they will start applying to the Member States participating in the SIS I+ only as of the date to be fixed by the Council acting by the unanimity of its members representing the governments of the Member States participating in SIS I +.
Pred tem in pred začetkom delovanja sistema, ga je treba v celoti testirati, da bi preverili, ali bo SIS II lahko deloval v skladu s tehničnimi in funkcijskimi zahtevami, kot so robustnost, razpoložljivost in učinkovitost.
Before this can happen and the system starts operating, it must be fully tested, with a view to assessing whether SIS II can work in accordance with the technical and functional requirements such as robustness, availability and performance.
Le po uspešno zaključenih preizkusih sistema SIS II bo mogoče narediti naslednji korak: migracijo uporabnikov SIS 1+ na okolje SIS II, pri čemer se mora prehod opraviti istočasno v vseh državah članicah (enkratna migracija).
Only after the successful completion of all SIS II tests we can go for the next step: the migration of the SIS I+ users to the SIS II environment, where the switch-over should take place on the same date for all Member States - "one-shoot migration".
Prvotni načrt je vključeval migracijo petnajstih držav članic (tedanje število), postopek pa bi trajal približno 8 ur.
The initial plan was to have a migration of 15 Member States (the number at that time), during a process that should take around 8 hours.
Na žalost je zaradi zamud in skoraj dvakrat večjega števila sodelujočih držav proces migracije postal kompleksnejši in težji, za naložitev omrežja pa je potrebno več časa.
Unfortunately, with all the delays and the fact that the number of countries participating almost duplicate, the migration process become much more complex, difficult and requiring more time to load the network.
Da bi zagotovili ustrezna orodja, ki so potrebna za obvladovanje velikega tveganja motenj v delovanju sistema med skupnim prehodom, sta bila leta 2008 odobrena dva pravna instrumenta, namenjena oblikovanju pravnega okvira za upravljanje migracije, ko bosta v prehodnem obdobju soobstajala oba sistema.
In order to provide the necessary tools to be able to deal with the high risks of a service disruption during the common switch-over, it were approved in 2008 two legal instruments aiming to establish the legal framework governing the migration, where the two systems will co-exist on that provisory period of time.
Dogovorili so se, da se vzpostavi prehodna tehnična struktura, ki bo omogočala sočasno delovanje SIS 1+ in nekaterih tehničnih elementov strukture SIS II v omejenem prehodnem obdobju, hkrati pa so želeli pojasniti pogoje, postopke, odgovornosti, financiranje procesa migracije in pravni okvir, ki bo veljal med migracijo.
It was decided to create an interim technical architecture allowing that the SIS I + and certain technical parts of the architecture of SIS II to be able to operate in parallel for a limited transitional period, and at the same time they tried to clarify conditions, procedures, responsibilities, the financing of the migration process and the substantive legal framework applicable during migration.
Uvedeno je bilo novo tehnično orodje – pretvornik –, ki omogoča uspešno pretvorbo in sinhronizacijo podatkov med SIS 1+ in SIS II.
A new technical tool was introduced - a "converter" - allowing for the successful conversion and synchronisation of data between SIS I+ and SIS II.
Povezoval bo centralna sistema SIS 1 in SIS II in jima tako omogočal obdelavo istih podatkov, državam članicam, ki so že uspešno povezane v sistem SIS II, pa zagotovil, da ostanejo na enaki ravni kot tiste, ki so še vedno povezane s SIS 1+.
In fact, the SIS I central system and the SIS II central system will be connect through the converter enabling them to process the same information and ensuring that the Member States already successful connected to the SIS II stay on the same level as the others that are still connected to the SIS I+.
Dodana je bila tudi nova funkcija možnosti prehoda nazaj, da se omogoči delovanje prehodne tehnične strukture.
A new function - "the reverse mode" - has also been added in order to allow this interim technical architecture to work.
Operativni zagon SIS II bo pomenil konec razvojne faze in začetek uporabe pravne podlage SIS II.
The operational start of SIS II will close the development phase and the beginning of the SIS II legal basis applicability.
Po tej logiki mora biti faza migracije zadnja naloga v okviru razvojnega mandata za SIS II, kar za Komisijo pomeni, da mora do operativnega zagona SIS II zanj imeti veljavni razvojni mandat, da se zagotovi izvajanje vseh nalog, ki so v pravnih instrumentih SIS II določene kot pogoj, vključno z odpravo vseh napak, odkritih med testiranjem, in zagotovitvijo vseh potrebnih orodij, kot so testne platforme in sredstva, da bi vzpostavili brezhibno delujoč sistem.
According to this logic, than the migration phase has to be the final task under the development mandate for SIS II, implying the need to have a SIS II development mandate valid, for the Commission, until the operational start of SIS II, in order to allow them to carry out all the tasks defined as preconditions in the SIS II legal instruments, including the correction of any bugs identified during the test phases and to provide all necessary tools such as test platforms and resources, with the aim of delivering a system perfectly working.
Predlogi za migracijo
Migration proposals
Prvi zakonodajni sveženj, na podlagi katerega je bil Komisiji zaupan razvoj druge generacije SIS, je prvotno veljal do 31. decembra 2006 in bil nato podaljšan do 31. decembra 2008.
The first legislative package by which the Commission was entrusted with the development of the second generation SIS was valid until 31 December 2006 and was later extended to 31 December 2008.
Instrumenta za dejansko migracijo, Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1140/2008 in Sklep Sveta 2008/839/PNZ, določata, da mora biti migracija končana najpozneje do 30. septembra 2009.
The actual migration instruments, Council Regulation (EC) 1140/2008 and Council Decision 2008/839/JHA state that migration should be completed by 30 September 2009 at the latest.
Komisija lahko po potrebi s postopkom komitologije ta datum podaljša do prenehanja veljavnosti instrumentov za migracijo.
If necessary, the Commission could extend this date through comitology until the expiry of the migration instruments.
Klavzula o prenehanju veljavnosti določa, da ta poteče 30. junija 2010.
The sunset clause sets the date for expiry at 30 June 2010 .
Komisija zato predlaga ponovno spremembo instrumentov za migracijo pred potekom njune veljavnosti.
Therefore, the Commission proposes to amend the migration instruments again before they expire.
Po zadnjih napovedih bi lahko bila migracija zaključena do konca leta 2011.
The latest forecasts indicate that the migration could be completed by the end of 2011.
V poročilu o napredku razvoja sistema SIS II, ki ga je oktobra 2009 objavila Komisija, je navedeno, da sta za zadnje četrtletje 2009 in poletje 2010 predvidena dva preizkusa za dosego t. i. mejnikov za SIS II.
The progress report on the development of SIS II, published by the Commission in October 2009, states that the two so-called milestone tests for SIS II are foreseen for the fourth quarter of 2009 and summer 2010 respectively.
V skladu s sklepi Sveta s 4. in 5. junija 2009 se izvajanje sedanjega projekta SIS II nadaljuje, vendar bo v obdobju, ki je potrebno za testiranje SIS II, za vsak slučaj ohranjen še načrt ukrepov za obvladovanje izrednih razmer (SIS 1+RE).
According to the Council conclusions of 4/5 June 2009 the current SIS II project is being continued, but a contingency plan (SIS 1+RE) is kept in reserve for the period necessary to test SIS II.
Iz teh razlogov je Komisija predstavila nov sveženj predlogov (KOM(2009) 508 in 509), ki spreminjata pravna instrumenta o migraciji s SIS 1+ na drugo generacijo SIS II.
For those reasons the Commission presented a new package of proposals (COM(2009) 508 and 509) amending the two legal instruments on migration from the SIS I + to the second-generation SIS.
Začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe
Entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon
Uveljavitev Lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2010 je na ta sveženj vplivala tako: prvi del svežnja, KOM(2009) 508, je ostal v obravnavi.
The effect of the entry into force of the new Treaty on 1 December 2010 on this package was as follows: The first part of the package, COM(2009)508, remained pending.
Uvrščen je bil na seznam v prilogi 4 omnibus sporočila Komisije o posledicah začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja.
It was listed in annex 4 of the "omnibus" Communication of the Commission on "Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing inter-institutional decision-making procedures".
Nova pravna podlaga je v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo člen 74 PDEU.
The new legal basis under the Treaty of Lisbon is Article 74 TFEU.
Postopek je ostal postopek posvetovanja.
The procedure remained consultation.
Drugi del svežnja, KOM(2009)509, je z uveljavitvijo nove pogodbe odpadel.
The second part of the package, COM(2009)509, lapsed with the entry into force of the new Treaty.
Komisija ga je nadomestila z novim predlogom, KOM(2010)15.
The Commission replaced it by an new proposal, COM(2010)15.
Pravna podlaga je prav tako člen 74 PDEU, postopek pa postopek posvetovanja.
The legal basis is also Article 74 TFEU, and the procedure consultation.
Črtanje klavzul o prenehanju veljavnosti
Deleting the sunset clauses
Pogoji za migracijo ne bodo izpolnjeni do 30. junija 2010.
The conditions for migration will not be met by 30 June 2010.
Komisija predlaga popolno črtanje klavzule o prenehanju veljavnosti, kar pomeni, da datum poteka instrumentov ne bi bil več določen.
The Commission proposes to delete the sunset clause completely, i.e. not to set date for the expiry of the instruments any more.
Nerazumljivo je, da Komisija ne more predlagati možnega datuma za operativni začetek SIS II, kar zbuja velike dvome o načinu upravljanja projekta.
The fact that the Commission is not able to propose a possible date for the start of operations of the SIS II is inconceivable and raises enormous doubts in the way the project is being managed.
Uvedba prožnosti za razvoj SIS II z nadomestno tehnično rešitvijo
Introducing flexibility for developing SIS II via alternative technical solutions
V skladu s predlogom Komisije bi predlagane spremembe zajemale tudi možnost prehoda s projekta SIS II, če ta ne bi bil uspešen, na alternativni scenarij, kot je SIS1+RE.
According to the Commission proposal the modifications proposed would also cover the case of a switchover from the SIS II project, should it not be completed successfully, to an alternative scenario such as SIS1+ RE.
Komisija zato predlaga spremembo členov 4 in 10(3) instrumentov ter uvedbo načela „v potrebnem obsegu“.
To this end the Commission suggests to modify Article 4 and Article 10 paragraph 3 of the instruments and to introduce the formula "to the extent necessary".
Te spremembe bi pomenile, da se t. i. pretvornik – tehnični element, ki je povezan izključno s projektom SIS II – ne bi več upošteval kot obvezni tehnični sestavni del strukture za migracijo.
These modifications would imply that the so-called converter, a technical element which is exclusively linked to the SIS II project, is no longer considered as a compulsory technical component of the migration architecture.
Uvedba Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa
Introducing the Global Programme Management Board (GPMB)
Komisija poleg tega predlaga, naj se z novim členom 17a v pravna instrumenta vključi Odbor za globalno upravljanje programa.
Furthermore, the Commission suggests to insert the Global Programme Management Board (GPMB) in the legal instruments, via a new Article 17a.
Gre za skupino desetih tehničnih strokovnjakov, in sicer osmih strokovnjakov iz držav članic in dveh uradnikov Komisije.
The GPMB is a group of 10 technical experts - 8 from the Member States and 2 Commission officials.
Namen ustanovitve odbora je boljše usklajevanje dela Komisije in držav članic med procesom migracije.
It was created in order to better coordinate Commission's and Member States works during the migration process.
Svet je v svojih sklepih o prihodnji usmerjenosti SIS II s 4. in 5. junija 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj okrepi strukturo upravljanja informacijske tehnologije in Odbor za globalno upravljanje programa tesneje vključi v upravljavsko strukturo.
In its conclusions on the further direction of SIS II of 4/5 June 2009 the Council had asked the Commission to enhance the IT management structure and to further integrate the GPMB in the management structure.
Vključitev odbora v pravno podlago bi omogočila tudi, da bi se njegovi upravni in potni stroški financirali iz proračuna Unije.
Its integration in the legal basis would also allow for its administrative costs and travel expenses to be financed from the Community budget.
Mnenje poročevalca
Position of the rapporteur
Evropski parlament je globoko zaskrbljenost izrazil tudi zaradi zamud pri začetku delovanja SIS II.
Once more, the European Parliament expressed deep concern with the delays on the start of operations of the SIS II.
Poleg tega je Komisijo in Svet pozval, naj ga takoj po izvedbi preizkusa dosege prvega mejnika, ki je bil sprva predviden v decembru 2009, obvestita o rezultatih testov in prihodnjih korakih.
It asked, also, to be informed by the Commission and the Council on the test results and future steps, immediately after the completion of the milestone 1 test, which was originally planned for December 2009.
Parlament je zahteval tudi popolno preglednost izvajanja procesa SIS II.
Parliament also called for full transparency as regards the implementation process of SIS II.
Medtem je bil preizkus dosege prvega mejnika prestavljen z decembra 2009 na konec januarja 2010.
In the meantime the milestone 1 test was postponed from December 2009 to the end of January 2010.
Preizkusi iz januarja 2010 niso bili zelo uspešni, in ocena njihovih rezultatov še vedno poteka.
The tests in January 2010 were not very successful; the evaluation of the test results is still ongoing.
Morda bo treba preizkus dosege prvega mejnika ponoviti, da bi bilo mogoče priti do zaključkov.
Possibly the milestone 1 test will have to be repeated before final conclusions can be drawn.
Poročevalec predlaga naslednje:
The rapporteur makes the following recommendations:
– klavzula o prenehanju veljavnosti bi se morala ohraniti; Komisiji bi morala biti dovoljena določena prožnost za prilagoditev datumov v postopku komitologije, da bi pravni okvir lahko prilagodila za alternativni scenarij, če projekt SIS II ne bo uspešen;
The Commission should be granted some flexibility to adapt the dates through comitology, in order to adapt the legal framework to an alternative scenario if the SIS II project is not successful.
– bistvenega pomena je ohraniti parlamentarni nadzor procesa migracije: saj je Parlament sozakonodajalec za pravno podlago za SIS II, poleg tega pa ja tudi del proračunskega organa, ki nadzoruje migracijo, ki se financira iz proračuna Unije;
- It is essential to keep the migration process under parliamentary scrutiny: Parliament is the co-legislator for the SIS II legal basis; Parliament also forms part of the budgetary authority, which supervises the migration, financed from the Community budget.
– iz enakih razlogov se Parlament ne bi smelo več izključevati iz postopka odločanja v zvezi z migracijo; pred prehodom na novi sistem bi moral biti Parlament v celoti obveščen o rezultatih testiranj in podati pozitivno mnenje;
- For the same reasons Parliament should no longer be excluded from the decision-making as regards migration; before switching over to the new system Parliament should be fully informed on the test results and issue a favourable opinion.
– ker datum zaključka procesa migracije in tehnična rešitev še nista jasna, mora zakonodajalec zagotoviti veljavnost pravnega okvira za SIS II, ne glede na možne tehnične težave, ki bodo odločale o izbiri končne tehnične rešitve.
- As the date of completion of the migration process and the technical solution are not yet certain, the legislator must ensure that the legal framework intended for SIS II applies, regardless of potential technical problems that will determine the choice of the final technical solution.
Ustanovitev Odbora za globalno upravljanje programa in njegova formalna vključitev v upravljavsko strukturo SIS II bi lahko bili pozitiven korak k spodbuditvi sodelovanja med državami članicami in Komisijo, poleg tega pa bi zagotavljali neposredno podporo držav članic centralnemu projektu SIS II.
The creation of the GPMB and its formal integration into the SIS II management structure, can be seem as a positive step in order to enhance the cooperation between the Members States and the Commission and, also, to provide direct Member States support to the central SIS II project.
Omejiti je treba tudi število strokovnjakov, da bi zagotovili uspešnost in stroškovno učinkovitost.
It is also important to limit the number of experts in order to ensure efficiency as well as cost effectiveness.
Če projekt SIS II ne bo uspešen, si Parlament pridržuje pravico, da pozove Evropsko računsko sodišče, naj opravi podrobno revizijo o upravljanju projekta SIS II in finančnih posledicah za proračun Unije.
In case the SIS II project fails Parliament reserves, itself, the right to invite the European Court of Auditors to carry out an in-depth audit on how the SIS II project was managed and on the financial implications for the Community budget.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1104/2008 o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) N° 1104/2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
Parlament je večkrat obžaloval zamude pri razvoju projekta SIS II.
Parliament has repeatedly deplored the delays in the development of the SIS II project.
Tako je na primer storil 22. oktobra 2009, ko je sprejel resolucijo o napredku pri razvoju schengenskega informacijskega sistema II in vizumskega informacijskega sistema.
It did so, for example, on 22 October 2009, when it adopted a resolution on the progress of the Schengen Information System II and the Visa Information System.
V poročilu o napredku razvoja sistema SIS II, ki ga je Komisija objavila oktobra 2009, je navedeno, da sta v zadnjem četrtletju 2009 in poleti 2010 predvideni dve tehnični testiranji SIS II.
The progress report on the development of SIS II, published by the Commission in October 2009, states that the two SIS II ‘milestone’ tests are to be carried out in the fourth quarter of 2009 and in summer 2010.