natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(c) ni potrebe, da bi generalni direktorati Komisije izgubili vse pristojnosti na področju zunanjih odnosov; zlasti na področjih, ki so v izključni pristojnosti Komisije, bi bilo treba ohraniti celovitost sedanjih politik Skupnosti z zunanjepolitično razsežnostjo; Komisija bi morala zagotoviti poseben model za ustrezne službe, kot so generalni direktorati za trgovino, širitev in razvoj ter odnose z afriškimi, karibskimi in pacifiškimi državami, urad za sodelovanje EuropeAid, urad Evropske skupnosti za človekoljubno pomoč, urad za človekove pravice in demokracijo, urad za pomoč pri volitvah in službe generalnega direktorata za gospodarske in finančne zadeve, ki so pristojne za zunanje odnose;
(c) it is not, however, necessary to strip the Commission Directorates-General of all their external relations responsibilities; particularly in fields where the Commission has executive powers, the integrity of current Community policies with an external dimension should be preserved; the Commission should provide a specific model for the departments concerned, such as the Directorates-General for trade, enlargement and development and relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific States, EuropeAid, the European Community Humanitarian Office, the department for Human Rights and Democracy, the department for Election Assistance, and the externally oriented units of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs;
Odstavek 4 – točka d a (novo)
Paragraph 4 - point d a (new)
(da) neodvisni komisar za razvoj in humanitarno pomoč mora biti član kolegija komisarjev, enakovreden kolegom, ki so zadolženi za druge politike na področju za mednarodne odnose; zadolžen mora biti za oblikovanje in izvajanje politike razvojnega sodelovanja, v državah AKP in v drugih državah v razvoju pa naj tesno sodeluje z visokim predstavnikom;
(da) an independent Commissioner for development and humanitarian aid needs to be a member of the College of Commissioners, on an equal footing with the other Commissioners in charge of other policies in the field of international relations; this Commissioner must have responsibility both for formulating and implementing development cooperation policy, working closely together with the High Representative, both in ACP states and other developing countries;
Odstavek 4 – točka d b (novo)
Paragraph 4 - point d b (new)
(db) poleg tega mora imeti Komisija en sam generalni direktorat, ki bo pristojen za oblikovanje politik, strateško svetovanje in izvajanje politike razvojnega sodelovanja Unije; generalni direktorat in vse osebje, ki izvaja razvojno politiko Unije v Bruslju in v okviru prekomorskih delegacij, poroča komisarju za razvoj;
(db) by extension, there must be a single, specific Directorate-General for development at the Commission, with responsibility for policy setting, policy advice and implementation of the Union's development cooperation policy; that Directorate-General, as well as all staff who implement the Union's development policy, both in Brussels and in overseas delegations, must report to the Development Commissioner;
Odstavek 5 – točka c a (novo)
Paragraph 5 - point c a (new)
(ca) EEAS mora vključevati zadostno število strokovnjakov s področja razvoja iz državnih ministrstev in iz generalnega direktorata Komisije za razvoj; uradniki generalnega direktorata sprejemajo navodila od komisarja za razvoj;
(ca) the EEAS must include a sufficient number of development professionals from national ministries and the Commission Directorate-General for Development; the officials of that Directorate-General should receive their instructions from the Commissioner for Development;
Odstavek 6 – točka b
Paragraph 6 - point b
(b) bila razdeljena na več direktoratov, od katerih bi vsak bil pristojen za geostrateško pomembno področje zunanjih odnosov Unije, in dodatne direktorate za razvoj, vprašanja varnostne in obrambne politike, civilno krizno upravljanje, večstranske in horizontalne zadeve, tudi človekove pravice in upravne zadeve;
(b) be divided into a number of directorates, each of which would be responsible for a geostrategically important field of the Union's external relations, and further directorates for development , security and defence policy issues, civilian crisis management, multilateral and horizontal affairs including human rights and administrative matters;
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001 o seznamu tretjih držav, katerih državljani morajo pri prehodu zunanjih meja imeti vizume, in držav, katerih državljani so oproščeni te zahteve
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement
Poročevalka: Tanja Fajon
Rapporteur: Tanja Fajon
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2009)0366 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2009)0366 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 67(1) in 62(2)(b)(i) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0112/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 67 and Article 62(2)(b)(i) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0112/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 55 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7–0042/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0042/2009 ),
Predlog uredbe Sveta – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a Council regulation – amending act
(1) Sestava seznamov tretjih držav v prilogah I in II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001 z dne 15. marca 2001 mora in bi morala biti še naprej skladna z merili iz uvodne izjave 5 Uredbe.
(1) The composition of the lists of third countries in Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 should be, and should remain, consistent with the criteria laid down in recital (5) thereto.
Nekatere tretje države, v zvezi s katerimi so se razmere glede teh meril spremenile, bi bilo treba prenesti iz ene priloge v drugo.
Some third countries, for which the situation has changed as regards these criteria, should be transferred from one Annex to the other.
(1) Komisija je sedanji dialog o liberalizaciji vizumskega režima začela z regionalnim pristopom in evropsko perspektivo, vanj pa so pod enakimi pogoji in brez diskriminacije vključene države Zahodnega Balkana.
(1) Th e Commission initiated the current visa liberalisation dialogue with a regional approach and a European perspective, in volving countries of the Western Balkans on an equal footing and without any discrimination.
Sestava seznamov tretjih držav v prilogah I in II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001 z dne 15. marca 2001 mora in bi morala biti še naprej skladna z merili iz uvodne izjave 5 Uredbe.
The composition of the lists of third countries in Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 should be, and should remain, consistent with the criteria laid down in recital (5) thereto.
Nekatere države Zahodnega Balkana (Albanija, Bosna in Hercegovina, Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija, Črna gora in Srbija) , v zvezi s katerimi so se razmere glede teh meril spremenile, bi bilo treba prenesti iz ene priloge v drugo.
Some of the Western Balkans countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia) , for which the situation has changed as regards th o se criteria, should be transferred from one Annex to the other.
Za vse te države morajo veljati ista merila iz načrtov za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima.
The same criteria laid down in the roadmaps for visa liberalisation should be applied to all countries concerned.
(1a) Vse države Zahodnega Balkana, ki izpolnjujejo merila, je treba sprejeti v režim potovanj brez vizumov z začetkom 2010.
(1a) All of t he Western Balkan countries that have met the benchmarks should be admitted to the visa-free travel regime from the beginning of 2010.
Državam, ki so sicer dosegle znaten napredek, vendar meril vseeno ne izpolnjujejo v celoti, pa je treba omogočiti enak privilegij takoj, ko bodo izpolnjevale merila iz ustreznih načrtov za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima.
Those countries that, despite having made substantial progress, have not fully met the benchmarks should be granted the same privilege as soon as they meet the benchmarks as set out in the corresponding roadmaps for visa liberalisation.
(2) Sporazumi o poenostavitvi vizumskih postopkov s petimi državami Zahodnega Balkana − Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Črno goro in Srbijo − so začeli veljati 1. januarja 2008, kar je bil prvi konkretni korak na poti, določeni v Solunski agendi glede režima potovanj brez vizumov za državljane držav Zahodnega Balkana.
(2) With five Western Balkan countries – Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia – Visa Facilitation Agreements entered into force on 1 January 2008, as a first concrete step forward along the path set out by the Thessaloniki agenda towards a visa free travel regime for the citizens of Western Balkan countries.
Z vsako od teh držav se je leta 2008 začel dialog o liberalizaciji vizumskega režima in določeni so bili časovni načrti za liberalizacijo tega režima.
With each of these countries, a visa liberalisation dialogue was opened in 2008 and roadmaps for visa liberalisation have been established.
Komisija je maja 2009 v svoji oceni izvajanja časovnih načrtov menila, da Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija izpolnjuje vsa merila iz časovnega načrta.
In its assessment of the implementation of the roadmaps of May 2009, the Commission considered that the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has met all the benchmarks set out in its roadmap.
Črna gora in Srbija izpolnjujeta večino meril iz svojih časovnih načrtov.
Montenegro and Serbia have met the large majority of the benchmarks of their respective roadmaps.
(2) Sporazumi o poenostavitvi vizumskih postopkov s petimi državami Zahodnega Balkana so začeli veljati 1. januarja 2008, kar je bil prvi konkretni korak na poti, določeni v Solunski agendi glede režima potovanj brez vizumov za državljane držav Zahodnega Balkana.
(2) With five Western Balkan countries Visa Facilitation Agreements entered into force on 1 January 2008, as a first concrete step forward along the path set out by the Thessaloniki agenda towards a visa free travel regime for the citizens of Western Balkan countries.
Z vsako od teh držav se je leta 2008 začel dialog o liberalizaciji vizumskega režima in določeni so bili časovni načrti za liberalizacijo tega režima.
With each of th o se countries, a visa liberalisation dialogue was opened in 2008 and roadmaps for visa liberalisation have been established.
Komisija je maja 2009 v svoji oceni izvajanja časovnih načrtov menila, da Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija izpolnjuje vsa merila iz časovnega načrta.
In its assessment of the implementation of the roadmaps of May 2009, the Commission considered that the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ha d met all the benchmarks set out in its roadmap.
Črna gora in Srbija izpolnjujeta večino meril iz svojih časovnih načrtov.
Montenegro and Serbia have met the large majority of the benchmarks of their respective roadmaps .
Albanija ter Bosna in Hercegovina sta od zadnjega ocenjevanja Komisije maja 2009 dosegli nadaljnji napredek pri večini pomembnejših meril.
Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina have made further progress with regard to the majority of the relevant benchmarks since the assessment of the Commission in May 2009 .
Prvi del je posledica sprememb iz predloga spremembe 1.
First part is an editorial consequence of Amendment 1.
V drugem delu so dodane manjkajoče informacije o dveh državah Zahodnega Balkana, ki sta bili vključeni v dialoge o liberalizaciji vizumskega režima in zlasti v oceno Komisije iz maja 2009.
Second part adds missing information about two states of the Western Balkans, which were covered by the visa liberalisation dialogues and in particular by the assessments of the Commission of May 2009.
Glede na oceno Komisije sta obe državi dosegli pomemben napredek, bistveno pa sta napredovali med majem in septembrom 2009, kar še ni bilo zabeleženo v predlogu Komisije iz julija 2009.
According to the Commission's assessment both countries made important progress and a significant progress (not recorded in the Commission's proposal of July 2009) was made between May and September 2009.
(2a) V spodbudo izvajanju Solunske agende in kot del regionalnega pristopa bi morala Komisija – v mejah svojih pristojnosti in glede na resolucijo varnostne ga sveta Združenih narodov 1244 (1999) – začeti dialog o vizumskem režimu s Kosovom, da bi se oblikoval časovni načrt za poenostavitev in liberalizacijo vizumskega režima, podoben načrtom za druge države Zahodnega Balkana.
(2a) With the aim of furthering the implementation of the Thessaloniki agenda and as part of its regional approach, the Commission, within the limits of its competence and in the light of UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) , should start a visa dialogue with Kosovo with a view to establish ing a roadmap for visa facilitation and liberalisation similar to th ose established with Western Balkan countries.
(3a) Z namenom krepitve stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega procesa bodo potovanja brez vizumov izboljšala udeležbo na skupnem trgu, ki se postopno vzpostavlja z Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Črno goro in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, ter prispevala k trgovini, inovacijam in rasti.
(3 a ) With the aim of strengthening the s tabilisation and a ssociation p rocess, visa-free travel will improve participation in the common market , which is gradually being established with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and will contribute to trade, innovation and growth.
Trenutno sta v veljavi stabilizacijsko-pridružitvena sporazuma z Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo (začetek veljavnosti 1. maja 2004) in Hrvaško (začetek veljavnosti 1. februarja 2005).
Stabilization and Association Agreements are currently in force: with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (entry into force on 1 May 2004) and with Croatia (entry into force on 1 February 2005).
Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum z Albanijo je bil podpisan junija 2006, začasni sporazum o trgovini in trgovinskih zadevah pa je začel veljati 1. decembra 2006.
The SAA with Albania was signed in June 2006 and the interim agreement (IA) on trade and trade-related matters entered into force on 1 December 2006.
Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum z Albanijo je sedaj v veljavi od 1. aprila 2009.
The SAA with Albania is currently in force since the 1 st of April 2009.
Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum in začasni sporazum s Črno goro sta bila podpisana 15. oktobra 2007, začasni sporazum pa je začel veljati 1. januarja 2008.
The SAA and IA with Montenegro were signed on 15 October 2007 and the IA entered into force on 1 January 2008, the agreements with Bosnia and Herzegovina were signed on 16 June 2008 and the IA entered into force 1 July 2008.
Sporazuma z Bosno in Hercegovino sta bila podpisana 16. junija 2008, začasni sporazum pa je začel veljati 1. julija 2008.
Agreements with Serbia are not yet signed and no interim agreement is in force.
(4) Zato je treba Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Črno goro in Srbijo [slednji morata do dneva sprejetja te uredbe izpolnjevati vsa merila] prenesti v Prilogo II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001.
(4) Therefore the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia [ the latter two meeting all the benchmarks by the date of adoption of the present Regulation] , should be transferred to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Odprava vizumov bi morala veljati le za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov, ki jih izda vsaka od treh zadevnih držav.
This visa waiver should only apply to holders of biometric passports issued by each of the three countries concerned.
(4) Zato je treba Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Črno goro , Srbijo , Albanijo ter Bosno in Hercegovino prenesti v Prilogo II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001.
(4) Therefore the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro , Serbia, Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina, should be transferred to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Za Črno goro in Srbijo se pričakuje, da bosta do datuma sprejetja te uredbe izpolnjevali vsa merila.
Montenegro and Serbia is expected to meet all the benchmarks by the date of adoption of this Regulation.
Za Albanijo ter Bosno in Hercegovino bi morala oprostitev vizumske obveznosti začeti veljati po tem, ko bo Komisija ocenila, da izpolnjujeta vsa merila, določena v ustreznem načrtu za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima, in po tem, ko bo to oceno potrdil Svet.
The exemption from the visa requirement should apply to Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina after an assessment by the Commission that each meets all the benchmarks set in the relevant roadmap for visa liberalisation and after approval of that assessment by the Council.
Odprava vizumov bi morala veljati le za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov, ki jih izda vsaka od petih zadevnih držav.
The visa waiver should apply only to holders of biometric passports issued by each of the five countries concerned.
Uvodna izjava je spremenjena zaradi predlogov sprememb 5 in 6, ki spreminjata dejansko besedilo Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001.
The recital is amended as a consequence of Amendments 5 and 6, which change the actual text of the Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Liberalizacija vizumskega režima bo začela veljati, ko bodo izpolnjena vsa merila.
The visa liberalisation will apply only when all the benchmarks are fulfilled.
(4a) Komisija bi morala nemudoma in najpozneje v začetku leta 2010 predstaviti poročilo o napredku, ki sta ga Albanija ter Bosna in Hercegovina dosegli pri izpolnjevanju meril iz načrta.
(4a) T he Commission should, without delay and no later than in the early 2010, present a report on the achievements made by Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina in meeting all the benchmarks set in the roadmap.
(4b) Kljub napredku Albanije ter Bosne in Hercegovine pri izpolnjevanju ustreznih meril, bi morali pristojni organi teh držav nemudoma sprejeti reforme, potrebne za popolno izpolnjevanje njihovih meril.
(4 b ) Although Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina have made progress towards meeting the ir respective benchmarks, the relevant authorities of Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina should adopt, without delay, the necessary reforms to meet the ir respective benchmarks in full .
(4c) Pri tem bi morala Komisija pomagati pristojnim organom v Albaniji in Bosni in Hercegovini.
(4 c ) The Commission should assist the relevant authorities of Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina in this respect.
(5a) Proces liberalizacije vizumskega režima bi moral služiti kot referenca za opredeljevanje odnosov z vzhodnimi partnericami Evropske unije.
(5a) Th e visa liberalisation process should serve as a reference for defining relations with the Eastern partners of the European Union .
V skladu s členom 7 skupne izjave praškega vrhunskega srečanja o vzhodnem partnerstvu si Evropska unija želi doseči popolno liberalizacijo vizumskega režima z vzhodnimi partnerji, pod pogojem, da izpolnjujejo potrebne pogoje.
According to article 7 of the Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit, the European Union aims at the full liberalization of the visa regime with its Eastern neighbours, provided that they comply with the necessary conditions.
Člen 1 – točka 1 – točka (–a) (novo)
Article 1 – point 1 – point -a (new)
Priloga I – del 1
Annex I – part 1
(-a) v delu 1 se navedba Albanije ter Bosne in Hercegovine nadomesti z:
(-a) in Part 1, the references to Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina are replaced by the following:
Bosna in Hercegovina (*)
Bosnia and Herzegovina *
( * ) Ime države se črta iz te priloge in se prenese v Prilogo II po tem, ko Komisija oceni, da država izpolnjuje vsa merila iz načrta za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima ter je to v skladu s Pogodbo.“
* The name of the c ountry shall be deleted and transferred from this Annex to Annex II after an assessment by the C ommission that the c ountry in question meets all the benchmarks set in the roadmap for visa liberalisation and in accordance with the Treaty. "
Priloga II – del 1
Annex II – part 1
2) v delu 1 Priloge II se vstavijo naslednje navedbe:
2) In Annex II , Part 1, the following references shall be inserted:
2) v delu 1 Priloge II se vstavijo naslednje navedbe:
2) In Annex II , Part 1, the following references are inserted:
„Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija (*)
"the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia *
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija (**)
the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia * *
Srbija [razen imetnikov srbskih potnih listov, ki jih izda srbski usklajevalni urad (v srbščini: Koordinaciona uprava ) ] (*)
Serbia [excluding holders of Serbian passports issued by the Serbian Coordination Directorate (in Serbian: Koordinaciona uprava ) ] *
Srbija [razen imetnikov srbskih potnih listov, ki jih izda srbski usklajevalni urad (v srbščini: Koordinaciona uprava )] (**)
Serbia [excluding holders of Serbian passports issued by the Serbian Coordination Directorate (in Serbian: Koordinaciona uprava ) ] * *
( * ) Ime države se prenese v to prilogo iz Priloge I po tem, ko Komisija oceni, da država izpolnjuje vsa merila iz načrta za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima ter je to v skladu s Pogodbo.
* The name of the c ountry shall be transferred to this Annex from Annex I after an assessment by the C ommission that the c ountry in question meets all the benchmarks set in the roadmap for visa liberalisation and in accordance with the Treaty.
Oprostitev vizumske obveznosti velja le za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov.
The exemption from the visa requirement applies only to holders of biometric passports .
( * ) Oprostitev vizumske obveznosti velja le za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov “.
* The exemption from the visa requirement only applies to holders of biometric passports ".
( ** ) Oprostitev vizumske obveznosti velja le za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov“.
* * The exemption from the visa requirement applies only to holders of biometric passports ." .
Ob razpadu Jugoslavije na začetku devetdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja države članice današnje Evropske unije niso uspele zagotoviti skupne regionalne politike, ki bi končala krvave vojne.
Back in the beginning of the 1990s when Yugoslavia was collapsing, the Member States of today's European Union were not able to deliver a common regional policy, which would put a stop to bloody wars.
Odgovornost za regijo smo postopoma prevzeli od Američanov, ki so svojo pozornost usmerili na druga krizna žarišča po svetu.
We took over the responsibility of the region progressively from the Americans who moved on to other "hot spots" of the globe.
Naš cilj je vzpostaviti stabilnost in blaginjo v tej regiji, ki naj bi se pridružila Evropski uniji, vendar se je treba zavedati, da so z izrazom „regija“ mišljeni njeni prebivalci.
Our goal is to build stability and prosperity in the region which is to join the Union, but we must always remember that when we say "the region" we are talking about people living there.
Ne smemo pozabiti, da smo po razpadu Jugoslavije in krutih vojnah, ki so pustile globoke rane ter več sto tisoč beguncev in migrantov, ki so pobegnili iz regije, priča odraščanju mlade generacije, ki je odrezana od vse bolj povezane in uspešne Unije, ki obdaja regijo.
And, we should bear in mind that after the break up of Yugoslavia, after cruel wars that left very deep wounds and hundreds of thousands of refugees and migrants who fled the region, we are witnesses to the growth of a young generation which is cut off from the unifying and prosperous Union surrounding the region.