natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za proizvajalce, ki ne prodajo več kot 10 000 enot v EU, so predvidene olajšave, a bo zanje na pogajanjih s Komisijo določen specifičen "ad hoc" cilj.
An exemption mechanism is envisaged for manufacturers whose sales within the EU do not exceed 10 000 units, with their nevertheless being assigned an ‘ad hoc’ specific target that would be negotiated with the Commission.
Predlog proizvajalcem omogoča, da se združujejo in tako skupaj prispevajo k dosegi zastavljenih ciljev.
Lastly, the proposal allows manufacturers the possibility of forming pools and hence of collectively meeting the targets set.
Poročevalec lahko samo izrazi strinjanje s predlogom uredbe kot celote, zlasti podpira njegovo vsebino, cilje in namen.
Your rapporteur can but express his overall approval of the proposal for a regulation as a whole, and in particular supports its subject matter, targets and objectives.
Meni, da je treba tudi avtomobilski sektor vključiti v cilje zmanjšanja emisij CO2 po vsem svetu, ob tem pa upoštevati vse njegove posebnosti (obnašanje voznika, obnavljanje voznega parka, infrastrukturni pogoji).
He believes that the car industry should fit in with the overall targets for the reduction of CO 2 emissions, despite acknowledging its special characteristics (driver behaviour, car fleet renewal, infrastructure conditions).
Poročevalec potrjuje časovne cilje Komisije in ob tem meni, da je bistveno, da se dolgoročni cilji Parlamenta ponovno obravnavajo in da se predloži povprečna omejitev emisij, ki ne bi presegala 95 g CO2/km in ki bi jo bilo treba doseči do leta 2020.
Therefore, while approving the targets and the timescales established by the Commission, he considers it a priority to revert to the position adopted by Parliament on long‑term targets and to propose an average level of emissions of no more than 95 g CO 2 /km by 2020.
Natančen cilj, za katerega poročevalec upa, da bo postal ambicioznejši, bo določila Komisija po reviziji uredbe, ki jo je treba opraviti do leta 2014 in ki bo sledila skupni presoji vpliva, kateri bo priložena analiza gospodarskih, okoljskih in družbenih učinkov vzdolž cele proizvodne verige.
The precise target – which your rapporteur hopes will become more ambitious – will be set by the Commission following a review of the Regulation that is to be conducted by 2014, and which will be preceded by an overall impact assessment coupled with an analysis of the economic, environmental and social effects on the entire production chain.
Poročevalec se strinja z izbiro celostnega pristopa za zagon sistema, a se sprašuje, ali ne bi bilo ustreznejše prepustiti odločitve o načinu dosege dodeljenega specifičnega cilja avtomobilski industriji.
Your rapporteur fully supports the choice of the integrated approach in the launch phase of the system; he nevertheless wonders whether it would not be more appropriate to allow the car industry to decide on the arrangements for meeting the specific targets assigned.
Ne bi bilo treba, da zakonodajalec obravnava vprašanje, ali industrija dosega cilje prek tehničnih izboljšav, dopolnilnih ali drugih ukrepov, pod pogojem, da bo cilj merljiv prek serije že obstoječih in v prihodnosti pripravljenih preizkusov.
Whether that industry achieves the targets it has been set by way of technical advances, complementary measures or any other means, should not enter into the legislative debate, provided that those targets are quantifiable and can be assessed using the existing test cycles and those to be implemented in the future.
Poročevalec poziva Komisijo, naj pretehta možnost, da bi se razlike med dopolnilnimi ukrepi in ukrepi na motornih vozilih dolgoročno odpravile.
Your rapporteur therefore calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of scrapping, in the long term, the current distinction between complementary measures and measures relating to motor vehicles.
Isto velja za kazalec uporabnosti: Komisija se je v svojem predlogu odločila za kazalec mase, ker "so podatki o njej že na voljo, masa pa je tudi kazalec, ki omogoča zadovoljivo ujemanje s sedanjimi vrednostmi emisij ter oblikovanje realnih in konkurenčno nevtralnih ciljev".
Your rapporteur also supports the choice of the utility parameter: in its proposal, the Commission has opted for the mass parameter, which is, in its own words, provides ‘ a satisfactory correlation with present emissions and would therefore result in more realistic and competitively neutral targets and … d ata on mass is readily available ’.
Vendar Komisija vnaprej ne izključuje možnosti uporabe drugega kazalca, tako da v svojem predlogu meni, da "je treba zbirati podatke o nadomestnem kazalcu uporabnosti – odtisu (kolotek, pomnožen z medosno razdaljo)".
However, the Commission does not automatically exclude the possibility of using an alternative parameter, to the extent that in its proposal it considers it appropriate for ‘Data on the alternative utility parameter of footprint (track width times wheelbase)… to be collected’.
V oktobrski resoluciji je Parlament z veliko večino zavrnil uvedbo kazalca mase in tako potrdil kazalec odtisa.
In its October resolution, Parliament rejected by a large majority the introduction of the mass parameter, advocating the footprint option.
Poročevalec se zaveda, da kazalec odtisa ponuja več zagotovil z okoljskega vidika, saj je manj občutljiv na morebitna popačenja (povečanje mase, da bi se dosegli manj strogi cilji zmanjšanja).
Your rapporteur is aware that the footprint parameter provides greater guarantees from an environmental viewpoint as it is less prone to undesirable effects (increase in mass in order to have a less stringent reduction target).
Poročevalec zaenkrat ne predlaga sprememb na predlog Komisije, kar zadeva spremembo kazalca uporabnosti, a si jemlje pravico, da v prihodnjih korakih zakonodajnega postopka spremeni mnenje.
Your rapporteur has not at this stage proposed any amendment to the Commission proposal as regards changing the utility parameter, but reserves the right to review Parliament’s position at the subsequent stages of the legislative process.
Poročevalec predlaga, naj se kazni za prekomerne emisije uporabijo za financiranje raziskovalnih dejavnosti na področju podpornih tehnologij (npr. tehnologije za čiste in energetsko učinkovite toplotne stroje, vgrajene varnostne sisteme) kot tudi prodornih tehnologij (npr. vodik in gorivne celice, razvoj hibridov z možnostjo ponovnega polnjenja, druga generacija biogoriv).
As regards excess emissions premiums, your rapporteur proposes that these be used to finance both incremental research (e.g. clean and energy efficient thermal engines, integrated safety systems) and innovative technologies (e.g. hydrogen and fuel cells, development of rechargeable hybrids, second generation biofuels).
V zvezi s kaznimi za nedoseganje določenega cilja se poročevalec strinja s predlogom Komisije, čeprav se ponuja za obravnavo rešitev, ki bi lahko naredile sistem v prvem koraku njegovega izvajanja (2012–2015) bolj prožen in da bi se hkrati nagrajevali in spodbujali najboljši pristopi proizvajalcev.
Your rapporteur agrees with the Commission proposal as regards the issue of the penalties applicable in the event of the set targets not being met, despite expressing willingness to consider solutions that would make the system more flexible in the first phase of its application (2012-2015) while at the same time rewarding and encouraging a better approach from manufacturers.
Poročevalec tudi ponuja vrsto tehničnih prilagoditev predloga Komisije, zlasti prek odprave nanašanja na maso 2160 kg, saj meni, da bi tako bilo preveč težkih vozil izključenih iz okvira te uredbe.
Your rapporteur also suggests a series of technical adjustments to the Commission proposal, and in particular withdrawal of the reference mass of 2 610, as he believes that this would exclude too many heavy vehicles from the scope of the regulation.
Nazadnje poročevalec spreminja člen o informacijah za potrošnike, ker meni, da to področje ureja Direktiva 1999/94/ES.
Finally, your rapporteur had amended the article on the information to be provided to consumers, as he feels that this area should be governed by Directive 1999/94/EC.
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI
OPINION OF COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASE
Zadeva: mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi standardov emisijskih vrednosti za nove osebne avtomobile kot del celostnega pristopa Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz lahkih tovornih vozil ( KOM(2007)0856 ) ( KOM(2007)0856 – C6‑0022/2008 – 2007/0297(COD) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles ( COM(2007)0856 – C6‑0022/2008 – 2007/0297(COD) )
Spoštovani gospod predsednik,
Dear Chair,
Odbor za pravne zadeve se odločil, da bo na lastno pobudo obravnaval vprašanje pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga uredbe, kar je v skladu s členom 35(3) poslovnika.
The Legal Affairs Committee decided to take up the question of the legal basis for the above-mentioned proposal for a regulation on its own initiative pursuant to Rule 35(3) of the Rules of Procedure.
Opozoriti je treba in limine , da morajo vsi akti Skupnosti temeljiti na pravni podlagi, določeni v Pogodbi (ali drugem pravnem aktu, ki naj bi ga izvajali).
It is noted, in limine , that all Community acts must be founded upon a legal basis laid down in the Treaty (or in another legal act which they are intended to implement).
Zadeva C-377/98, Nizozemska proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu , [2001] Poročila Sodišča Evropskih skupnost I-7079, odstavka 27 in 28; Zadeva C-491/01, British American Tobacco (Investments) in Imperial Tobacco [2002] Poročila Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti I-11453, odstavka 93 in 94. .
Case C-377/98 Netherlands v. European Parliament and Council [2001] ECR I-7079, paras 27-28; Case C-491/01 British American Tobacco (Investments) and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 93-94. .
Komisija predlaga, naj bo člen 95 Pogodbe o ES edina pravna podlaga za predlog uredbe.
The Commission is proposing Article 95 of the EC Treaty as the sole legal basis for the proposal for a regulation.
Predlog je namenjen zagotavljanju ustreznega delovanja notranjega trga osebnih avtomobilov z določitvijo povprečnih specifičnih emisij novih osebnih avtomobilov v Skupnosti, ki od leta 2012 naprej ne bodo smele presegati 130 g CO2/km.
The proposal aims to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market for passenger cars by ensuring that average specific emissions of new passenger cars in the Community do not exceed 130g CO2/km from 2012 onwards.
Glavni vidiki tega predloga so:
The key aspects of the proposal are as follows:
· Predlog se bo uporabljal za vozila M1 (osebni avtomobili).
· The proposal will apply to M1 vehicles (passenger cars).
· Predlog določa cilje za specifične emisije CO2 iz osebnih avtomobilov glede na njihovo maso.
· The proposal sets targets for the specific emissions of CO2 from new passenger cars in the Community as a function of their mass.
· Predlog določa obvezne cilje za specifične emisije CO2 iz osebnih avtomobilov od leta 2012 naprej.
· The proposal sets mandatory targets for the specific emissions of CO2 of passenger cars from 2012 onwards.
Cilji bodo veljali za povprečne specifične emisije CO2 v g/km za nove osebne avtomobile vsakega proizvajalca, registrirane v EU v vsakem koledarskem letu.
The targets will apply to the average specific emissions of CO2 in g/km for new passenger cars for each manufacturer which are registered in the EU in each calendar year.
Za doseganje svojih ciljev se lahko proizvajalci medsebojno združujejo.
Manufacturers may form a pool in order to meet their targets.
Če se bosta združila dva proizvajalca ali se bo združilo več proizvajalcev, bodo za potrebe ugotavljanja izpolnjevanja ciljev obravnavani kot en sam proizvajalec.
Where two or more manufacturers form a pool, the pool will be treated as if it is one manufacturer for the purposes of determining its compliance with the targets.
· Države članice bodo morale zbirati podatke o novih avtomobilih, registriranih na njihovem ozemlju, in jih posredovati Komisiji za potrebe ocene izpolnjevanja ciljev.
· Member States will be obliged to collect data on the new cars registered in their territory and to report this data to the Commission for the purposes of assessing compliance with the targets.
· Če proizvajalec ne bo uspel doseči zastavljenega cilja, bo moral plačati premijo za presežne emisije za vsako koledarsko leto od leta 2012 naprej.
· If a manufacturer fails to meet its target, it will be required to pay an excess emissions premium in respect of each calendar year from 2012 onwards.
Skupna premija, ki se bo plačala, se bo izračunala tako, da se bo število gramov CO2/km, ki bodo presegali zastavljen cilj proizvajalca, pomnožilo s številom novo registriranih osebnih avtomobilov in premijo za presežne emisije za dano leto.
The total premium payable will be calculated by multiplying the number of g CO2/km by which the manufacturer exceeded its target by the number of cars newly registered and by the excess emissions premium for the year.
Premija za presežne emisije bo za emisije v letu 2012 znašala 20 EUR, v letu 2013 35 EUR, v letu 2014 60 EUR, v letu 2015 in vsakem naslednjem letu pa 95 EUR.
The excess emissions premium will be 20 euros for emissions in 2012, 35 euros for emissions in 2013, 60 euros for emissions in 2014 and 95 euros for emissions in 2015 and each subsequent year.
Obrazložitveni memorandum pravi: "Člen 95 Pogodbe ES je primerna pravna podlaga zaradi potrebe po zagotavljanju enakih možnosti za vse gospodarske akterje na notranjem trgu in visoke stopnje zdravstvene in okoljske zaščite".
According to the Commission's explanatory memorandum, "Article 95 of the EC Treaty is the appropriate legal basis because of the need to ensure a level playing field for all economic actors in the internal market while at the same time ensuring a high level of protection of health and the environment."
To naj bi bilo v skladu z naslednjimi uvodnimi izjavami:
This would appear to be supported by the following recitals:
(1) Cilj te uredbe je določitev standardov emisijskih vrednosti za nove osebne avtomobile, registrirane v Skupnosti, s čimer se bo zagotovilo ustrezno delovanje notranjega trga in izpolnil del celostnega pristopa Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz lahkih tovornih vozil.
(1) The objective of this Regulation is to set emission performance standards for new passenger cars registered in the Community which ensures the proper functioning of the internal market and delivers part of the Community's integrated approach to reducing CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles.
(2) Notranji trg zajema območje brez notranjih meja, na katerem mora biti zagotovljen prost pretok blaga, oseb, storitev in kapitala.
(2) The internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital must be ensured.
Skupnost je v avtomobilskem sektorju vzpostavila dobro delujoč notranji trg, ki je postal trdna osnova za nemoteno trgovanje z avtomobilskimi proizvodi znotraj Skupnosti.
The Community has put in place a well-functioning internal market in the automotive sector, which has created a solid basis for uninterrupted intra-Community trade in automotive products.
Da bi preprečili različne zahteve v posameznih državah članicah, ohranili dosežke notranjega trga ter zagotovili prost pretok osebnih avtomobilov znotraj Skupnosti in hkrati visoko stopnjo varstva okolja je treba uskladiti cilje emisij CO2.
The targets for CO2 emissions should be harmonised to avoid differing requirements between Member States, to preserve the achievements of the internal market and ensure the free movement of passenger cars within the Community while ensuring a high level of environmental protection.
(5) Pomembno je sprejeti cilje Skupnosti za nove potniške avtomobile, da se prepreči razdrobljenost notranjega trga, ki bi jo povzročilo sprejemanje različnih ukrepov na ravni držav članic.
(5) Adopting Community targets for new passenger cars is necessary to prevent fragmentation in the internal market resulting from the adoption of different measures at Member State level.
Cilji Skupnosti omogočajo proizvajalcem bolj zanesljivo načrtovanje in večjo prilagodljivost pri doseganju zahtev za zmanjšanje emisij CO2, kot bi ju omogočali posamezni nacionalni cilji.
Community targets provide manufacturers with more planning certainty and more flexibility to meet the CO2 reduction requirements than would be provided by separate national reduction targets.
Pri določanju standardov glede emisij je pomembno upoštevati vpliv na trge in na konkurenčnost proizvajalcev, neposredne in posredne stroške za podjetja ter koristi, ki izhajajo iz tega, kot sta spodbujanje inovacij in zmanjševanje porabe energije.
In setting emission standards it is important to take into account the implications for markets and manufacturers’ competitiveness, the direct and indirect costs imposed on business and the benefits that accrue in terms of stimulating innovation and reducing energy consumption.
(11) Pravni okvir za doseganje cilja povprečnega novega voznega parka mora zagotoviti konkurenčno nevtralne ter socialno pravične in trajnostne cilje zmanjšanja, ki ustrezajo raznolikosti evropskih proizvajalcev avtomobilov, ter preprečiti neupravičeno izkrivljanje konkurence med proizvajalci avtomobilov.
(11) The legislative framework for implementing the average new car fleet target should ensure competitively neutral and socially equitable and sustainable reduction targets which are equitable to the diversity of the European automobile manufacturers and avoid any unjustified distortion of competition between automobile manufacturers.
Pravni okvir mora biti skladen s splošnim ciljem doseganja kjotskega cilja EU in dopolnjen z drugimi, bolj praktičnimi inštrumenti, kot so raznoliki davki na avtomobile in energijo.
The legislative framework should be compatible with the overall objective of reaching the EU’s Kyoto targets and should be complemented by other more use-related instruments such as differentiating car and energy taxes.
Druge uvodne izjave utemeljujejo standarde emisijskih vrednosti, določene: uvodna izjava (3) se nanaša na okvirno konvencijo Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja in cilja EU, da se do leta 2020 zmanjšajo emisije toplogrednih plinov za vsaj 20 % v primerjavi z letom 1990; uvodna izjava (4) se nanaša na potrebo po zmanjšanju emisij osebnih avtomobilov, uvodna izjava (6) pa zahteva, da vse temelji na uveljavljenem evropskem procesu merjenja ter spremljanja in nadzorovanja emisij CO2, da se zagotovita predvidljivost in varnost načrtovanja za evropske proizvajalce vozil.
As against this, other recitals justify the emission performance standards set: (3) on the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the objective adopted by the EU of achieving at least a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions over 1990 levels by 2020; (4) on the need to reduce emissions from passenger cars, and (6) on the need to build on the existing EU process of measuring and monitoring CO2 emissions so as to ensure predictability and planning security for EU vehicle manufacturers.
Uvodne izjave (7), (8), (9) in (10) opisujejo napredek pri zmanjšanju emisij CO2, dosežen s strategijo Skupnosti, ki temelji na prostovoljni zavezi avtomobilske industrije k zmanjšanju emisij, izboljšanju obveščanja potrošnikov in spodbujanju k uporabi avtomobilov z učinkovito porabo goriv s pomočjo davčnih ukrepov.
Recitals (7), (8), (9) and (10) describe progress achieved with the Community strategy for reducing CO2 emissions, which is based on voluntary commitments from the car industry, improvements in consumer information and promotion of fuel-efficient cars via fiscal measures.
Uvodna izjava (12) utemeljuje uporabo kazalca mase.
Recital (12) justifies the use of the parameter mass.
Uvodna izjava (13) navaja naslednje: "Cilj te uredbe je ustvariti pobude za naložbe avtomobilske industrije v nove tehnologije.
Recital (13) states that " The aim of this Regulation is to create incentives for the car industry to invest in new technologies.
Uvodna izjava (14) pojasnjuje, da cilj emisij velja za nove avtomobile, ki so prvič registrirani v Skupnosti.
Recital (14) makes it clear that the emission target applies to new cars registered in the Community for the first time.
Uvodna izjava (15) navaja, da je za zagotavljanje skladnosti z uredbo odgovoren organ, ki je odgovoren tudi za homologacijo.
Recital (15) states that the entity responsible for ensuring compliance with the regulation is to be that responsible for type-approval.
Uvodna izjava (16) se nanaša na izjeme, ki veljajo za vozila za posebne namene.
Recital (16) deals with exemptions for special purpose vehicles.
Uvodni izjavi (17) in (18) se nanašata na možnost proizvajalcev pri izbiri načina za doseganje ciljev, zlasti z združevanjem.
Recitals (17) and (18) deal with allowing flexibility to manufacturers in deciding how to meet their targets, in particular through pooling.
Uvodna izjava (19) navaja naslednje: "Potreben je trden mehanizem skladnosti, da se zagotovi doseganje ciljev iz te uredbe" .
Recital (19) declares that " A robust compliance mechanism is necessary in order to ensure that the targets under this Regulation are met."
Uvodna izjava (20) se nanaša na pravila za zbiranje in posredovanje datuma emisij, uvodna izjava (21) pa na certifikate skladnosti.
Recital (20) deals with rules on collection and reporting of emission date and Recital (21) with certificates of conformity.
Uvodna izjava (22) obravnava plačilo 'premij za presežne emisije': "Skladnost proizvajalcev s cilji iz te uredbe je treba oceniti na ravni Skupnosti.
Recital (22) deals with the payment of the "excess emissions premium" as follows: "Manufacturers' compliance with the targets under this Regulation should be assessed at the Community level.
Da bi premija pomenila zadostno spodbudo za sprejetje ukrepov za zmanjševanje specifičnih emisij CO2 iz osebnih avtomobilov, mora odražati tehnološke stroške.
In order to provide a sufficient incentive to take measures to reduce specific emissions of CO2 from passenger cars, the premium should reflect technological costs.
Zneske premije za presežne emisije je treba šteti za prihodek v proračunu Evropske unije."
The amounts of the excess emissions premium should be considered as revenue for the budget of the European Union."
Treba je poudariti, da je v uvodni izjavi (26) posebej navedeno, da bi morala Komisija dobiti pooblastilo zlasti za "vzpostavitev metod za zbiranje premij za presežne emisije" .
It should be noted that in Recital (26) it is stated, in particular, that power should be conferred on the Commission to "to establish methods for the collection of excess emissions premiums" .
Uvodna izjava (23) navaja, da uredba ne posega v pravila Skupnosti o konkurenci.
Recital (23) states that the regulation is without prejudice to the Community competition rules.
Uvodna izjava (24) zagotavlja, da je treba izvajanje te uredbe podpreti s finančnim instrumentom Skupnosti za okolje (LIFE+).
Recital (24) provides that the implementation of the regulation should be supported by the Community Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+).
Uvodni izjavi (25) in (26) se nanašata na komitologijo; slednja celo določa, kateri nebistveni elementi se lahko spreminjajo ali dopolnijo.
Recitals (25) and (26) deal with comitology, with the latter recital even specifying what non-essential elements may be amended or supplemented.
Uvodna izjava (27) se nanaša na razveljavitev Odločbe 1753/2000/ES, uvodna izjava (28) pa vsebuje običajno izjavo o subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti.
Lastly, Recital (27) deals with the repeal of Decision 1753/2000/EC and Recital (28) makes the usual declaration about subsidiary and proportionality.
Glede vsebinskih določb:
As far as the substantive provisions are concerned:
Člen 1 določa vsebino in cilje uredbe:
Article 1 sets forth the regulation's subject-matter and objectives as follows: