natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E. ker se zavržki ne pojavljajo zgolj z določenim tipom opreme, ampak nanje vplivajo tudi značilnosti posameznega ribištva, kot je na primer evropsko ribištvo, ki je skoraj v celoti večvrstno, kar povečuje tveganje zavržkov; ker imajo lahko nekatera obrtna ribištva manjši zavržek, saj bolje uporabijo ulovljeno ribo in se s svojim poznavanjem ribolovnih območij izognejo nezaželenemu ulovu,
E. whereas discarding is a phenomenon that is not related only to the use of a particular gear type, but is also influenced by the nature of the fishery concerned, as in the case of European fisheries, almost all of which are multispecies in nature, where the risk of discards is higher; whereas some artisanal fisheries may have lower discard rates since they make greater use of the fish caught and use their knowledge of the fishing grounds to avoid unwanted catch,
F. ker ribolov z visokim deležem zavržkov vzbuja zaskrbljenosti javnosti glede okoljskega vpliva ribištva, kar posledično zmanjšuje njeno zaupanje v trgovino z ribami in vpliva na prodajo,
F. whereas fisheries with high discard rates could result in public concern over the environmental impact of fishing, causing reduced public confidence in fish on the market and ultimately affecting sales,
G. ker je razlogov za zavržke več, kot so čezmerni ribolovni napor, veljavni pristop glede celotnega dovoljenega ulova in kvote, ki silijo k zavržkom, neskladje pri številnih vrstah ribolova med specifikacijami za orodje in najmanjšo velikostjo iztovarjanja, višje sortiranje ( high-grading ) in ostale trgovinske prakse; ker je že tradicionalno večina novosti pri ribiški opremi namenjena povečanju ulova in ne bolj selektivnemu in manj uničujočemu ribarjenju;
G. whereas discarding is caused by a range of factors, including excessive fishing effort, the current approach to Total Allowable Catches (TACs) and quotas that requires discarding of fish for which there is no quota, a mismatch in many fisheries between gear specifications and minimum landing size, high-grading and other commercial practices; whereas traditionally most innovation in fishing gear and practices has aimed to increase catches of fish rather than to fish in a more selective and less environmentally destructive manner,
H. ker je EU med sklenjenimi mednarodnimi sporazummi, ki vsebujejo posebne izjave o potrebi po zmanjšanju zavržkov in prilova, sprejela kodeks odgovornega ribištva FAO in mednarodnimi akcijskimi načrti za morske ptice in morske pse, 12 poglavje Programa 21 Združenih narodov, rimski sporazum o svetovnem ribištvu, kjotsko izjavo o trajnostnem prispevku ribištva k varni preskrbi s hrano, Sporazum iz New Yorka o izvajanju določb Konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu in resolucij Generalne skupščine Združenih narodov 49/118 iz leta 1994 in 50/25 iz leta 1995, resolucijo medparlamentarne konference, Konvencijo o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prosto živečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami in Konvencijo o biološki raznovrstnosti,
H. whereas of the documents signed at international level and containing specific declarations on the need to reduce discards and by-catches, the EU agreed to the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fishing and the International Plans of Action for Seabirds and Sharks, Chapter 17 of the United Nations Programme 21, the Rome Consensus on World Fisheries, the Kyoto Declaration on the sustainable contribution of fisheries to food security, the New York Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and United Nations General Assembly resolutions 49/118 of 1994 and 50/25 of 1995, as well as the resolution of the 1995 Interparliamentary Conference, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD),
I. ker je EU soglašala s številnimi obvezami v okviru regionalnih ribiških organizacij ter dvostranskimi in večstranskimi sporazumi, v katerih sodeluje,
I. whereas the EU has agreed on a range of commitments within the framework of Regional Fisheries Organisations and the various bilateral and multilateral agreements to which it is party,
3. nadalje pozdravlja novo opredelitev zavržkov, ki obsega netržne in druge vrste rib, iz česar izhaja, da treba zmanjšati tudi zavržke pri slednjih;
Further welcomes the new definition of discards to include non-commercial species of fish and other species, with the implication that these other types of discards also need to be reduced;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva razpoložljivo znanstveno mnenje o albatrosih, ki jim zaradi trenutne stopnje pogina, zlasti pri ribolovu s parangalom, grozi izumrtje;
Calls on the Commission to take into account the available scientific opinion on albatrosses which, notably in long line fisheries, are currently being killed at a rate that is putting them in danger of extinction;
8. meni, da so prilovi in zavržki resna okoljska in gospodarska težava, saj se zaradi ruši ravnovesje v nekaterih ekosistemih, hkrati pa je bilo dokazano, da so glavni razlog za okrnitev staležev, tudi tistih z visoko tržno vrednostjo, kot je stalež trske;
Considers that by-catches and discards are a serious ecological and economic problem, since on the one hand they are responsible for the imbalance seen in some ecosystems, and on the other hand they have been identified as the main cause of the depletion of stocks, some of which have a high commercial value, such as cod;
13. poudarja, da je učinkovitost novih predpisov odvisna od primerne uporabe rezultatov znanstvenih raziskav ribolovnih območij v Evropski uniji in od upoštevanja posebnosti posameznih voda, ki so posledica njihove lege in biološke raznovrstnosti ter že dolgo ustaljenih ribiških praks;
Stresses that, if the provisions introduced are to be effective, due and proper use must be made of scientific fishing research relating to EU fisheries and account must be taken of the specific features of individual fisheries in connection with location, marine species diversity and long-established fishing practices;
17. je seznanjen z možnostjo prepovedi zavržka, za katero Komisija meni, da je najučinkovitejša, čeprav bi se takšna prepoved težko izvajala, povzročila pa bi tudi povečanje potreb po finančnih in logističnih virih ter po osebju;
Notes that the option which the Commission considers most effective is a discard ban, although such a ban could present some difficulties with respect to enforcement and may require an increase in financial, logistical and human resources;
20. spodbuja Komisijo, države članice in zainteresirane strani, naj uporabijo pozitivne spodbude za industrijo, ki bo tako izboljšala svoje ribolovne prakse; verjame, da je za pozitivne spodbude več možnosti, te so:
Encourages the Commission, the Member States and other stakeholders to consider the use of incentives for the industry to improve its fishing practices ; believes that there are various possibilities for such incentives, including:
· višje število dni na morju ali podaljšanje dovoljenega ribolovnega časa za plovila, ki uporabljajo več selektivnejša orodja,
· allowing more days at sea or increasing the allowable fishing time , for vessels using more selective gear,
· zagotovilo prednostnega dostopa plovilom, ki uporabljajo selektivna orodja na območja, zaprta za plovila, tega orodja ne uporabljajo,
· providing preferential access for vessels using selective gear to areas that are closed to those vessels not using selective gear,
1. , že vsebuje primer prednostnega dostopa za plovila s selektivnim orodjem, in sicer z dodatnim številom dni na morju, ki so na voljo plovilom z vlečno mrežo za lov na škampa, ki uporabljajo izločevalno rešetko in se strinja, da bi bilo treba obravnavati tovrstne spodbude;
OJ L 15, 20.1.2007, p.1. already contains one example of preferential access for selective gear, with extra days at sea available to Nephrops trawlers using a sorting grid, and agrees that such additional incentives should be considered;
23. poudarja pomen delujočega kontrolnega sistema po uvedbi prepovedi zavržkov; opozarja, da pomanjkljivo poznavanje količin zavrženih rib zmanjšuje kakovost ocen velikosti staležev in umrljivosti rib ter otežuje vrednotenje ukrepov za preprečevanje ulova rib, ki ne ustrezajo zahtevam glede velikosti; poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z razvojem tehnik nadzora, in v zvezi s tem opozarja na možnost, ki jo ponujajo elektronski ladijski dnevniki;
Stresses the importance of an effective monitoring system once a ban on discarding fish is introduced; points out that gaps in knowledge concerning the quantity of fish discarded impair the quality of estimates of stock size and fish mortality, and make it harder to evaluate measures seeking to prevent the catching of fish which do not meet size criteria; calls on the Commission to continue to develop new monitoring techniques, and draws attention in this connection to the possibilities opened up by electronic log books;
25. se strinja, da je najrazumnejši način za ravnanje izbira poskusnih vrst ribolova, ki temelji na količini zavržkov oziroma na ohranitvenem stanju zadevnih vrst; poudarja, da je pomembno, da se poskusni projekti izberejo v različnih območjih, kar bi predstavljalo geografsko raznolikost ribištva Skupnosti; verjame, da mora vsak poskusni projekt vključevati zadostno število plovil, da bi pokrili raznolikost ribolova in zagotovili dobro izmenjavo informacij znotraj sektorja; zato predlaga dve vrsti ribolova, to je ribolov z različnimi vlečnimi mrežami in ribolov, ki lovi in zavrže trske; priporoča, da se med izvajanjem poskusnih projektov, pri drugih vrstah ribolova oceni delež zavržkov;
Agrees that the most sensible way to proceed is by choosing a number of pilot fisheries, based upon the quantity of discards produced or on the conservation status of the species involved; emphasises the importance of the pilot projects being selected in several zones to represent the geographical variety of Community fisheries; believes that each pilot project must also involve a sufficient number of vessels to cover the diversity of the fishery as well as to ensure good information exchange with others in the fishery; suggests that two possible candidate fisheries would be the various beam trawl fisheries as well as those fisheries that catch and discard cod; recommends that while these pilot projects are proceeding, other fisheries should be evaluated for their discard rate;
(i) razviti natančno oceno količin in sestave vrst zavrženih rib in drugih zavrženih vrst za vsak segment ribolova; ribiči, znanstveniki in zainteresirane strani morajo sprejeti te podatke kot zanesljive in objektivne;
(i) develop an accurate estimate of the quantities and species composition of fish and other species discarded by each segment of the fishery; these data should be accepted as reliable and objective by fishermen, scientists and all other stakeholders;
(ii) ustanoviti ustrezen okvir za zagotavljanje celostnega posvetovanja, vključevanja in sodelovanja vseh zainteresiranih strani pred določanjem količinskih ciljev za zmanjšanje zavržkov v določenem obdobju (na primer 50-odstotno zmanjšanje v dveh letih); vanjo bi bili vključeni regionalni svetovalni svetovi, ribiči, znanstveniki, nacionalna vlada, Komisija in okoljske nevladne organizacije; vloga te institucije bi bila preučitev vseh predlogov za odpravo zavržkov, vključno z iztovorom s potegalkami, tehničnimi ukrepi, začasnimi lovopusti in zaprtimi ribolovnimi območji, kot tudi predlaganje pozitivnih spodbud za ribiče, ki preizkušajo različne tehnike;
(ii) establish an appropriate setting to ensure full consultation, involvement and cooperation of all stakeholders before deciding upon the quantitative targets for discard reduction in a given period (for instance a 50% reduction in two years); participants would include Regional Advisory Councils (RACs), fishermen, scientists, national government, the Commission and environmental NGOs; their role would be to explore all ideas for eliminating discards, including landing by-catch, technical measures, temporary closures, closed areas and others, as well as to propose positive incentives for fishermen experimenting with different techniques;
(iii) ob zaključku obdobja, načrtovanega za izvajanje, oceni rezultate ter preveri, če so bili cilji doseženi; uspešne metode se vključijo v določbe skupne ribiške politike; če cilj zmanjšanja prilova ni dosežen, se med drugimi sorazmernmi ukrepi uvedejo ustrezne kazni;
(iii) at the end of the planned period of implementation, assess the results and evaluate whether the objectives have been achieved; successful methods would be added to CFP provisions; if targets for the reduction of by-catch are not reached appropriate sanctions will be applied, amongst other proportionate measures;
(iv) redno pregleduje količinske ciljev glede zavržkov z namenom njihove dokončne odprave;
(iv) revise quantitative discard objectives on a regular basis with a view to ultimately eliminating discards;
30. poziva Komisijo, naj posebno pozornost nameni načinu prenosa ukrepov, da se bodo uporabljali za flote EU, ki lovijo v vodah tretjih držav, ter poziva, naj bo uporaba najbolj selektivnega ribolovnega orodja pogoj za ribolov v skladu s partnerskimi sporazumi o ribištvu;
Calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to how measures can be "translated" to apply to EU fleets fishing in the waters of third countries and asks that the use of the most selective fishing gears be made a pre-requisite for fishing under fishing partnership agreements (FPAs);
36. ugotavlja, da države članice trenutno lahko v skladu z uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 850/98 z dne 30. marca 1998 za ohranjanje ribolovnih virov s tehničnimi ukrepi za varovanje nedoraslih morskih organizmov
Notes that Member States currently have the right, under Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms
UL L 125, 27.04.1998, str.
OJ L 125, 27.4.1998, p.
37. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, državam članicam, regionalnim svetovalnim svetom, svetovalnemu odboru za ribištvo in ribogojstvo ter regionalnim organizacijam za upravljanje ribištva, katerih članica je EU.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Member States, the Regional Advisory Councils, the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture and the Regional Fisheries Management Organizations to which the EU belongs.
Vsako leto se pri ribolovu v Evropi in po svetu zavržejo velike količine rib.
Vast quantities of fish are thrown away, every year, in European fisheries and around the world.
FAO je objavila dve oceni zavržkov na svetovni ravni, po eni gre za 27 milijonov ton (1988–1990), po drugi, novejši, za 7 do 8 milijonov ton (1992–2001).
The FAO has published two estimates of global discards, one of 27 million tonnes (1988-90) and, more recently, of 7 to 8 million tonnes (1992-2001).
Po mnenju avtorjev novejše študije lahko delež te razlike pripišemo izboljšani selektivnosti opreme.
Part of this difference could be improvements in gear selectivity, according to the authors of the latter study.
Obe oceni predstavljata ogromno izgubo, ki je tudi predmet sporočila Komisije.
Either figure represents an enormous waste that is the subject of the Commission's communication.
Zavržki škodijo staležem rib, upočasnjujejo ali preprečujejo njihovo obnovitev, ribiči pa z zavržki izgubljajo čas in energijo.
Discards harm fish stocks, slow or prevent their recovery and cost fishermen time and energy to deal with.
Svet je po predhodnem gradivu za razpravo
In 2003, the Council invited the Commission to explore ways of reducing discards, following an earlier discussion paper
Po mnenju Komisije je bil od takrat dosežen le skromen napredek.
According to the Commission itself, very little progress has been made since then.
Zato je ta nova pobuda dobrodošla, čeprav se seveda sprašujemo, ali ji bo uspelo doseči kaj več.
This new initiative is thus to be welcomed, even if one has to wonder if anything more will be accomplished this time.
EU se je po kodeksu odgovornega ribištva FAO zavezala, da bo zavržke kar se da zmanjšala (zlasti člen 8.5), pristala je tudi na izvajanje akcijskih načrtov FAO za morske ptice in morske pse iz leta 1999 (kjer je bilo do sedaj le malo narejenega).
The EU made a commitment in the FAO Code of Conduct to minimize discards (particularly section 8.5), as well as agreeing to implement the 1999 FAO Plans of Action on Seabirds and Sharks (about which very little has been accomplished to date).
Zakonodaja EU prav tako omenja zavržke, na primer člen 2 osnovne uredbe
EU legislation also refers to discards, such as Art. 2 of the Basic Regulation
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 .
Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 .
Kot ugotavlja Komisija, neukrepanje proti zmanjšanju zavržkov ne pride v poštev.
As the Commission states, doing nothing to reduce discards is not an option.
Skupna ribiška politika ima do zavržkov kontraproduktiven pristop.
The CFP has a counter-productive approach to discards - on the one hand, the TAC rules require the discarding of vast quantities of commercial fish, both juvenile and mature.
Po eni strani je po pravilih o celotnem dovoljenem ulovu treba zavreči velike količine tržnih rib, tako nedoraslih kot odraslih, po drugi strani pa edini poskusi, da bi se ta izguba zmanjšala, slonijo na mikroupravljanju ribolovnega orodja in ribolovnih praks, kar bo industrijo napeljevalo k iskanju načinov, kako se predpisom izogniti.
On the other hand, the only attempts to reduce this waste rely on micro-managing fishing gear and practices, which is almost guaranteed to provoke the industry into finding ways to subvert those regulations.
Zdaj je čas za nov pristop in na srečo dokument Komisije kaže, da se tega zaveda.
The time for a new approach is here, and fortunately the Commission's paper shows signs of realizing that.
Pozitivna sprememba je razširjena opredelitev zavržkov, ki vključuje tako tržne kot netržne vrste, odvržene s krova.
A positive change is the expansion of the definition of discards to include both commercial and non-commercial species that are dumped over the side.
Za zavržke obstajajo številni vzroki, med katerimi so najpomembnejši:
Discards result from various causes, the most important of which are:
Ø ribolovni pritisk, ki v številnih vrstah ribolova precej presega to, kar bi bilo trajnostno;
Ø fishing pressure that is, in many fisheries, greatly in excess of what is sustainable;
Ø neskladje med specifikacijami orodja in najmanjšo velikostjo iztovarjanja pri nekaterih vrstah;
Ø a mismatch for some species between gear specifications and minimum landing size;
Ø sistem celotnega dovoljenega ulova, po katerem je treba zavreči ribe, ulovljene po dosegi kvote;
Ø the TAC system that requires fish caught after the quota is reached to be discarded;
Ø večvrstni ribolov, ki je usmerjen na vrste različnih velikosti;
Ø multi-species fisheries targeting species of different sizes;
Ø višje sortiranje, ko se obdržijo večje, vrednejše ribe, ostanek pa se zavrže.
Ø high-grading, or keeping larger, more valuable fish and discarding the rest.
Prav tako večina industrije v glavnem ni pokazala zanimanja za iskanje načinov, kako preprečiti ulov premajhnih ali netržnih rib.
There has also been a general lack of interest on the part of much of the industry in finding ways to not catch under-sized or non-commercial fish.
Najpomembnejše spremembe pri ribolovnem orodju v zadnjih desetletjih so se usmerile k obsežnejšemu in učinkovitejšemu ribolovu.
The profound modifications in fishing gear over recent decades has aimed at becoming ever larger and more efficient at catching fish.
Dokaj malo truda pa je bilo vloženega v izboljšanje selektivnosti, ki bi preprečevala ulov rib, za katere ribiči vedo, da jih bodo morali mrtve zavreči.
Comparatively little effort has been invested in improving selectivity to avoid catching fish that the fishermen know they will have to throw away, dead.
Na srečo nekateri sektorji industrije zdaj priznavajo, da so zavržki resen problem, kar dokazujejo tudi dokumenti o stališčih regionalnih svetovalnih svetov.
Fortunately, some sectors of the industry now acknowledge that discards are a serious problem, as witnessed by RAC position papers.
Drugi se še naprej upirajo – tako Europêche vztraja, da ne želi „neprijetnosti“ zaradi prizadevanj, da se zavržki zmanjšajo.
Others continue to resist, with Europêche insisting that they do not want to be "inconvenienced" by efforts to reduce discards.
Spremni dokument k sporočilu
The accompanying document to the Communication
SEC(2007)0380 poudarja, da je glavni razlog za tako velike zavržke v EU ta, da je skupni ribolovni pritisk prevelik, zato so staleži izčrpani, v njih pa prevladujejo predvsem majhne, nedorasle ribe.
SEC(2007)0380 points out that the main reason discards are so high in the EU is that overall fishing pressure is too high, resulting in depleted stocks with high preponderance of small, juvenile fish.
Zato je najučinkovitejši način za zmanjšanje zavržkov zmanjšati skupni ribolovni pritisk, kar bi imelo dodatno korist, saj bi si izčrpani in prelovljeni staleži lahko opomogli.
Thus, the single most effective way to reduce discards is to reduce overall fishing pressure, which would have the added benefit of allowing depleted and over-fished stocks to recover.
Te točke v sporočilu ni.
This point is missing from the Communication.
Sporočilo obravnava dve možnosti.
The Communication's paper considers two types of option.
Prva možnost so tehnični in drugi ureditveni ukrepi, tudi tradicionalni, kot so zaprta območja in omejitve pri orodju, namenjene izboljšanju selektivnosti, vendar jih je treba dopolniti z začasnimi zaprtji v realnem času in obveznostjo, da se ribolovna območja ob velikih količinah zavržkov spremenijo.
The first is technical and other regulatory measures including traditional ones such as closed areas and gear restrictions designed to increase selectivity, but supplemented by temporary real-time closures and an obligation to change fishing grounds when discards are high.
Druga možnost je prepoved zavržkov, ki od ribičev zahteva, da iztovorijo ves ulov.
The second is a ban on discards , requiring fishermen to land everything they catch.
Dokument razčlenjuje vpliv, ki ga bosta predvidoma imeli obe možnosti.
The paper analyzes the predicted impacts of these two approaches.
Po mnenju Komisije je tradicionalni pristop s tehničnimi ukrepi pripeljal do preveč zapletenih pravil, ki jih industrija zlahka zaobide, zato bo nadaljevanje v tej smeri prineslo le malo rezultatov.
In the view of the Commission, the traditional approach of technical measures has led to overly complicated rules that are easily circumvented by the industry, so little will be accomplished by continuing down this route.
Boljša izbira je kombinacija prepovedi zavržkov in uporabe nekaterih ureditvenih ukrepov.
The preferred choice is a combination of a discard ban and the use of certain regulatory measures.
Ker bo do zmanjšanja zavržkov prišlo, ko bodo ribiči spremenili način lovljenja, kar vključuje spremembe ribolovnega orodja (velikost mrežnih očes, izhodna okna, izločevalne rešetke) in inovativne ribolovne prakse (začasna zaprtja območij, spreminjanje ribolovnih območij, sezonska zaprta območja), je vprašanje, kako ribiče k temu spodbuditi.
Since reductions in discards will come about by fishermen changing the way they fish, involving modifications of fishing gear (mesh size, escape panels, sorting grids) and innovative fishing practices (temporary area closures, changing fishing ground, seasonal closed areas), the question is how to motivate the fishermen to this end.
Komisija daje prednost negativni spodbudi, uvedbi prepovedi zavržkov, saj predpostavlja, da bo celotni postopek prevoza in iztovarjanja tako nadležen, da bodo ribiči kmalu ugotovili, na kakšen način se temu lahko izognejo.
The Commission favours a negative incentive, the introduction of a ban on discards, on the assumption that bringing everything back to shore will so onerous that fishermen would quickly find ways to avoid having to do that.