natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ukrepi iz točk (a), (b) in (c), ki so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive, vključno z dodajanjem, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 11(3).
The measures referred to in points (a), (b) and (c), designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, inter alia, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 11(3).
Glede na predhodni predlog spremembe se lahko črta člen 10.
In view of the precedent amendment, the Article 10 can be deleted.
S členom 5a spremenjenega sklepa 1999/468/ES je bil uveden nov regulativni postopek s pregledom, ki naj bi se uporabljal za „ ukrepe splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb temeljnega akta, sprejetega s postopkom soodločanja, vključno s črtanjem nekaterih takšnih določb ali z dopolnitvijo akta z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb“ .
Article 5a of amended Decision 1999/468/EC introduced the new 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny' (RPS) for 'measures of a general scope which seek to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with codecision, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements' .
Konferenca predsednikov odborov se je 15. januarja 2008 dogovorila o načinu sodelovanja med Odborom za pravne zadeve in drugimi sodelujočimi odbori.
The Conference of Committee Chairs agreed on 15 January 2008 on the modalities of cooperation between the Committee on Legal Affairs and the other committees involved.
Glede na predlagano prilagoditev regulativnemu postopku s pregledom in po posvetovanju s področnim odborom poročevalec predlaga dve spremembi, katerih namen je pojasniti določbe o komitologiji.
In view of the proposed alignment to RPS, and having consulted the sectoral committee, the Committee on Legal Affairs proposes two amendments which aim to clarify the comitology provisions.
Predmet : Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statističnih poročilih glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju (prenovitev) – ( KOM(2007)0859 - 2007/0288 (COD))
Subject : Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (Recast) - ( COM(2007)0859 - 2007/0288 (COD))
Spoštovani gospod Gargani,
Dear Mr GARGANI,
Odbor za promet in turizem je na svoji seji 29. maja 2008 preučil navedeni predlog v skladu z odločitvijo konference predsednikov z dne 12. decembra 2007, da Odbor za pravne zadeve določi za matični odbor pri obravnavi revizije obstoječih zakonodajnih ukrepov in njihovi prilagoditvi novemu regulativnemu postopku s pregledom, in njenim zagotovilom, da se posebni odbori zaprosijo za mnenje.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism at its meeting of 29 May 2008 has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to the decision of the Conference of Presidents (CoP) of 12 December 2007 to designate the Committee on Legal Affairs as the lead Committee to deal with the revision of existing legislative measures to be adapted to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny and to ensure that the specialised committees are associated by opinions.
Odbor za promet in turizem soglasno priporoča vašemu odboru kot pristojnemu odboru, naj odobri prilagoditev s spremembami (predlogi sprememb), kot so bile predlagane v prilogi.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism unanimously recommends your committee, as the committee responsible, to accept the alignment with the modifications (amendments) as proposed in the annex.
Pripombe odbora JURI k predlogu Komisije
Observations of JURI Committee on the COM proposal
Predlagano stališče Evropskega parlamenta
Proposed European Parliament position
Delna prilagoditev regulativnemu postopku s pregledom, skladno s tem se upravljalni postopek ohrani za člene 7(2), 9 in 10(d)(e).
partial alignment to RPS , with the management procedure for Articles 7(2), 9 and 10(d)&(e) accordingly.
Člen 7(2): Regulativni postopek s pregledom ni potreben , saj so „tehnične podrobnosti posredovanja“ tako tehnične, da jih ni mogoče obravnavati, kot da dopolnjujejo temeljni akt.
Art. 7-2: no need for RPS , as "technical details of transmission" are so technical that it can't be considered really supplementing the basic act.
Člen 9: Regulativni postopek s pregledom ni potreben , saj so „podrobnosti objave ali diseminacije statističnih podatkov“ tako tehnične, da jih ni mogoče obravnavati, kot da dopolnjujejo temeljni akt.
Art. 9: no need for RPS , as "arrangements for publication or dissemination of statistical data" are so technical that it can't be considered really supplementing the basic act.
Točki d) in e) člena 10 sta odveč in ju je treba črtati.
Art. 10 d) and e) are redundant and should be deleted.
Če Svet in Komisija vztrajata, da je treba točki d) in e) člena 10 ohraniti, bi bilo bolj smiselno uporabiti regulativni postopek s pregledom za vse ukrepe, navedene v členu 10, vključno s tistimi iz členov 7(2) in 9, ki sta omenjena v točkah d) in e), saj se člen 10 začne s stavkom „Sprejmejo se podrobna pravila za izvajanje te direktive, vključno z ukrepi za njeno prilagoditev gospodarskemu in tehničnemu razvoju “, za tovrstne prilagoditve pa se običajno uporablja regulativni postopek s pregledom.
If Council or Commission insist that Art. 10 d) and e) should be kept, it would be more logical to apply RPS for all measures listed in Art. 10, including Art. 7-2 and 9 mentioned in d) and e), because Art. 10 starts with the phrase "Detailed rules for implementing this Directive, including measures for adapting it to economic and technical developments ", and such kind of adaptations fall normally under RPS.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statističnih poročilih glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea
KOM(2007)0859 z dne 21.12.2007 - 2007/0288(COD)
COM(2007)0859 of 21.12.2007 - 2007/0288(COD)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, zlasti z odstavkom 9 iz tega sporazuma, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 8. januarja 2008, da bi med drugim preučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 8 January 2008 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna različica obravnavanega besedila. po preučitvi predloga Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenovitvi Direktive Sveta št. 95/64/ES z dne 8. decembra 1995 o statističnih poročilih glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju (prenovitev) soglasno zaključila, da sta bila v obstoječe besedilo tehničnih prilog vstavljena naslednja dva popravka:
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Directive 95/64/EC of 8 December 1995 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, that the two following corrections were introduced into the existing texts of technical annexes:
2) v prilogi VIII, Podatkovni niz C1, je bila v prvi vrstici opombe med številki 34 in 51 vstavljena oznaka „5X“.
2) in Annex VIII, Data set C1, in the first line of the footnote the indication " 5X " was inserted between the figures " 34 " and " 51 ".
Posvetovalna skupina je torej lahko po pregledu predloga soglasno sklenila, da predlog ne vsebuje bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so kot takšne opredeljene v predlogu.
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such.
Statistična poročila glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju (prenovitev)
Statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea (recast version)
o posebnem poročilu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu po osnutku priporočila Evropski komisiji v pritožbi 3453/2005/GG
on the Special Report from the European Ombudsman following the draft recommendation to the European Commission in complaint 3453/2005/GG
o posebnem poročilu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu po osnutku priporočila Evropski komisiji v pritožbi 3453/2005/GG
on the Special Report by the European Ombudsman following the draft recommendation to the European Commission in complaint 3453/2005/GG
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu,
– having regard to the Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament,
– ob upoštevanju drugega pododstavka člena 195(1) in člena 211 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 195(1), second subparagraph, and Article 211 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. marca 1994 o pravilih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic (94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom)
– having regard to Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties
Sklep, kakor je bil spremenjen s sklepom 2002/262/ES, ESPJ, Euratom (UL L 92, 9.4.2002, str.
Decision as amended by Decision 2002/262/EC, ECSC, Euratom (OJ L 92, 9.4.2002, p.
13). , zlasti člena 3(7),
13). , particularly Article 3(7) thereof,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic o odnosih s pritožnikom v zvezi s kršitvami zakonodaje Skupnosti ( KOM(2002)0141 )
– having regard to the Commission Communication to the European Parliament and the European Ombudsman on relations with the complainant regarding infringements of Community law ( COM(2002)0141 )
UL C 244, 10.10.2002, str.
OJ C 244, 10.10.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju prvega stavka člena 195(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 195(2), first sentence, of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ter mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6–0289/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0289/2008 ),
A. ker je evropski varuh človekovih pravic na podlagi člena 195 Pogodbe ES pooblaščen za sprejemanje pritožb državljanov Unije glede nepravilnosti pri dejavnostih institucij ali organov Skupnosti,
A. whereas Article 195 of the EC Treaty empowers the European Ombudsman to receive complaints from any citizen of the Union concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies,
B. ker so pritožbe državljanov pomemben vir informacij o možnih kršitvah zakonodaje Skupnosti,
B. whereas complaints submitted by citizens constitute an important source of information on possible infringements of Community law,
C. ker je Komisija v svoji vlogi varuha pogodb v skladu s členom 211 Pogodbe ES odgovorna, da skrbi za uporabo določb Pogodbe in ukrepov, ki jih institucije sprejemajo v skladu s to pogodbo,
C. whereas under Article 211 of the EC Treaty the Commission in its role as guardian of the Treaties is responsible for ensuring that the provisions of the Treaty and the measures taken by the institutions pursuant thereto are applied,
D. ker Komisija, če v skladu s prvim odstavkom člena 226 Pogodbe ES meni, da katera od držav članic ni izpolnila obveznosti iz pogodbe, „poda” o zadevi utemeljeno mnenje, potem ko je tej državi omogočila, da predloži svoje pripombe, in ker „lahko” v skladu z drugim odstavkom tega člena zadevo predloži Sodišču, če zadevna država ne ravna v skladu z mnenjem v roku, ki ga določi Komisija,
D. whereas, pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 226 of the EC Treaty, if the Commission considers that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaty, it "shall" deliver a reasoned opinion on the matter after giving the State concerned the opportunity to submit its observations, and whereas, pursuant to the second paragraph of that article, if the State concerned does not comply with the opinion within the period laid down by the Commission, the latter "may" bring the matter before the Court of Justice,
E. ker je evropski varuh človekovih pravic že v svojem sklepu o pritožbi 995/98/OV poudaril, da Komisija razpolaga z diskrecijskimi pravicami v zvezi s postopkom za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki pa imajo pravne omejitve, „ki jih je vzpostavila sodna praksa Sodišča, ki na primer zahteva, da upravni organi delujejo dosledno in v dobri veri, se izogibajo diskriminaciji, izpolnjujejo načela sorazmernosti, enakosti in legitimnih pričakovanj ter spoštujejo človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine”,
E. whereas the Ombudsman has previously emphasised, in his Decision on complaint 995/98/OV, that, even though the Commission enjoys discretionary powers with respect to the opening of infringement procedures, these are nevertheless subject to legal limits "established by the case law of the Court of Justice which requires, for example, that administrative authorities should act consistently and in good faith, avoid discrimination, comply with the principles of proportionality, equality and legitimate expectations and respect human rights and fundamental freedoms",
F. ker je Komisija poudarila, da je ta vloga bistvena za interese evropskih državljanov, in priznava pomembnost pravne države v zvezi s tem
F. whereas the Commission has stressed that this role is essential to the interests of European citizens, and has recognised the importance of the rule of law in this context
Sporočilo Komisije „Boljše spremljanje uporabe prava Skupnosti“ (KOM(2002) 725 konč.) ,
Commission communication entitled "Better monitoring of the application of Community law" ( COM(2002)0725 final). ,
G. ker Komisija potrjuje, da določa njeno sporočilo o odnosih s pritožnikom v zvezi s kršitvami zakonodaje Skupnosti upravne ukrepe v korist pritožnika, s čimer se Komisija zavezuje, da jih bo upoštevala pri obravnavi njegove pritožbe in presoji zadevne kršitve,
G. whereas the Commission confirms that its Communication on relations with the complainant regarding infringements of Community law sets out the administrative measures for the benefit of the complainant with which the Commission undertakes to comply when handling his/her complaint and assessing the infringement in question,
H. ker varuh človekovih pravic meni, da je neuspeh Komisije v zvezi s sprejetjem dokončnega stališča glede pritožnikove pritožbe zaradi kršitev primer nepravilnosti,
H. whereas the Ombudsman considers that the Commission's failure to decide on a definitive position as regards the complainant's infringement complaint constitutes an instance of maladministration,
I. ker varuh človekovih pravic priporoča Komisiji, da obravnava pritožnikovo pritožbo čim bolj prizadevno in hitro,
I. whereas the Ombudsman's recommendation to the Commission is that it should deal with the complainant's complaint as rapidly and diligently as possible,
3. poudarja, da je Komisija v svojem sporočilu o odnosih s pritožnikom v zvezi s kršitvami zakonodaje Skupnosti sprejela nekatere obveznosti glede obravnavanja pritožb zaradi kršitev;
Points out that, in its Communication on relations with the complainant regarding infringements of Community law, the Commission has entered into certain commitments as regards its handling of infringement complaints;
5. se strinja, da lahko preiskave Komisije v težkih in zapletenih zadevah trajajo več kot eno leto; vendar meni, da je prekoračitev enoletnega roka upravičena le, kadar preiskave dejansko še potekajo;
Accepts that in difficult and complicated cases the Commission's investigations may require more than one year; considers, however, that exceeding the one-year time-limit is justified only when investigations are indeed still ongoing;
Direktiva 2003/88/ES, ki nadomešča in razveljavlja direktivo 93/104/ES (UL L 299, 18.11.2003, str.
Directive 2003/88/EC, which replaced and repealed Directive 93/104/EC (OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p.
7. opozarja, da je bil navedeni predlog pripravljen septembra 2004 in da ni nobenih dokazov, ki bi potrjevali, da je Komisija sprejela dodatne ukrepe za nadaljevanje svoje preiskave;
Recalls that that proposal was submitted in September 2004 and that there is no evidence that the Commission has taken any further steps since then in order to proceed with its investigation;
11. meni, da imajo diskrecijske pravice tudi pravno omejitev, ki jo določajo splošna načela upravnega prava, ki jih je vzpostavila sodna praksa Sodišča, in ne bi smele presegati omejitev, ki jih je v svojem sporočilu določila Komisija sama;
Is of the opinion that the powers of discretion are also subject to legal limits set by general principles of administrative law, as established by the case-law of the Court of Justice, and should not exceed the limits indicated by the Commission itself in its communication;
13. ponovno poudarja ključno vlogo držav članic v zvezi s pravilnim izvajanjem zakonodaje Skupnosti in dejstvo, da je praktično izvajanje navedene zakonodaje odločilno v smislu večje pomembnosti Evropske unije za njene državljane;
Emphasises once again the key role of the Member States in correctly implementing Community legislation and underlines the fact that the practical application thereof is decisive for the purposes of increasing the relevance of the European Union for its citizens;
15. poziva Komisijo, naj takoj preuči nov nemški zakon, ki je bil sprejet 1. januarja 2004 in je začel veljati 1. januarja 2007, da ugotovi, ali je v skladu z vsemi določbami direktive o delovnem času in vsemi veljavnimi sodbami Sodišča; poudarja, da mora Komisija natančno preučiti izvajanje navedene direktive;
Urges the Commission to analyse forthwith the new German law adopted on 1 January 2004, and which came into effect on 1 January 2007, in order to establish whether it is in line with all the provisions of the Working Time Directive and all applicable judgments of the Court of Justice; underlines the need for the Commission to examine the details of the implementation of that Directive;
Novembra 2001 je pritožnik, tj. nemški zdravnik, zahteval, da Evropska komisija proti Nemčiji sproži postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev.
In November 2001, the complainant, a German doctor, requested the Commission to open infringement proceedings against Germany.
Pritožnik se je pritožil, da je Nemčija kršila Direktivo Sveta 93/104/ES z dne 23. novembra 1993 o določenih vidikih organizacije delovnega časa
The complainant argued that Germany infringed Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time
UL L 307, 13.12.1993, str.
OJ L 307, 13.12.1993, p.
(Direktiva 93/104/ES) v zvezi z dejavnostjo zdravnikov v bolnišnicah, zlasti v zvezi s časom dežurstva teh zdravnikov.
("Directive 93/104"), in so far as the activity of doctors in hospitals was concerned, in particular as regards time spent on call by these doctors.
Po mnenju pritožnika so bili zato osebje in pacienti resno ogroženi.
In the complainant's view, this resulted in a considerable risk for both staff and patients.
V svoji pritožbi (2333/2003/GG) je navedel, da Komisija njegove pritožbe za ugotavljanje kršitev ni obravnavala v razumnem roku.
In this complaint (2333/2003/GG) the complainant alleged that the Commission had failed to deal with his infringement complaint within an appropriate period of time.
V sklepu, s katerim se je končala ta preiskava, je varuh človekovih pravic ugotovil, da je v tej zadevi preteklo skoraj 15 mesecev, preden je Komisija začela obravnavati ugovore pritožnika in poslala zahteve za informacije zadevnim državam članicam.
In the decision closing this inquiry the Ombudsman noted that nearly 15 months had passed in the present case before the Commission had started dealing with the objections raised by the complainant by sending a request for information to the Member State concerned.
Varuh človekovih pravic je menil, da Komisija pritožnikove pritožbe zaradi kršitev ni obravnavala v razumnem roku in da je to primer nepravilnosti.
The Ombudsman considered that the Commission had failed to deal with the complainant's infringement complaint within a reasonable period of time and that this constituted an instance of maladministration.
Medtem je Nemčija sprejela novi zakon, da je uskladila nemško zakonodajo z direktivo 93/104/ES, pri čemer je morala Komisija preveriti usklajenost nove zakonodaje z zakonodajo Skupnosti, da je lahko obravnavala pritožnikovo pritožbo zaradi kršitev.
In the meantime Germany had adopted a new law in order to bring the German legislation in line with Directive 93/104/EC and the Commission needed to examine the compatibility of this new legislation with Community law in order to be able to deal with the complainant's infringement complaint.
Komisija je 6. decembra 2004 obvestila pritožnika, da je sprejela predlog spremembe direktive o delovnem času (2003/88/ES)
On 6 December 2004, the Commission informed the complainant that it had adopted a proposal for an amendment of the Working Time Directive (2003/88/EC)
UL L 299, 18.11.2003, str.
OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p.
9–19. in da bo pritožbo zaradi kršitev obravnavala v skladu z navedenim predlogom.
9-19. and that it would examine the infringement complaint in the light of this proposal.
Pritožnik se je 2. novembra 2005 ponovno obrnil na varuha človekovih pravic (pritožba 3453/2005/GG).
On 2 November 2005, the complainant turned to the Ombudsman again (complaint 3453/2005/GG).
Navedel je, da ni prejel nadaljnjih informacij o stališču, ki ga je predlagala Komisija v zvezi z njegovo zadevo.
He submitted that he had received no further information on the position the Commission proposed to adopt concerning his case.
Menil je, da je Komisija zadevo zavlačevala in ni upoštevala varuha človekovih pravic.
He took the view that the Commission was delaying the matter and ignoring the Ombudsman.
Dejansko je ponovil obtožbe iz svoje pritožbe.
He essentially repeated the allegation in his earlier complaint.
Komisija je v svojem mnenju navedla, da je imela diskrecijsko pravico glede sprožitve ali nadaljevanja postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev.
In its opinion the Commission stated that it had a discretion as to whether to start or continue infringement proceedings.
Pritožnik je navedel, da zakonodaja EU ni predvidela možnosti nespoštovanja zakonov in sodb na podlagi novih pravil, ki jih je predlagala Komisija.
The complainant alleged that EU law did not envisage the possibility of disregarding laws and judgments on the grounds that the Commission proposed new rules.
Če je dejstvo, da so bili predloženi takšni predlogi, omogočilo, da je nespoštovanje obstoječe zakonodaje zakonito, je pravni red Evropskih skupnosti po pritožnikovem mnenju nesmiseln.
If the fact that such proposals had been submitted made it lawful to disregard existing law, the legal order of the European Communities was, in the complainant's view, a farce.
S takšnim ravnanjem je Komisija ogrozila pravni mir in namenoma izkrivljala zakonodajo.
By acting as it did, the Commission jeopardised the legal peace and deliberately distorted the law.
Varuh človekovih pravic je 12. septembra 2006 Komisiji poslal naslednji osnutek priporočila:
On 12 September 2006, the Ombudsman addressed the following draft recommendation to the Commission: