natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sestavi se priročnik za uporabo, ki je preveden v vse uradne jezike Skupnosti in organom za oddajo javnih naročil zagotavlja smernice za uporabo meril znaka za okolje.
A user manual translated into all official Community languages providing guidance for the use of the Ecolabel criteria to authorities awarding public contracts shall be established.
Opomba: Komisija bo zagotovila predloge priročnikov za uporabo za prosilce in pristojne organe ter priročnikov za uporabo za organe za oddajo javnih naročil , prevedene v vse uradne jezike Skupnosti .
Note: The Commission will provide templates translated into all official Community languages for the user manual for applicants and competent bodies and for the user manual for authorities awarding public contracts
Priloga II – odstavek 4a (novo) (na koncu Priloge II)
Annex II – paragraph 4 a (new) (at the end of Annex II)
Besedilo na znaku za okolje določijo pristojni organi vsake države članice z uporabo uradnega jezika ali jezikov te države članice tako, da je besedilo enako angleškemu izvirniku.
The lettering on the Ecolabel shall be determined by the competent bodies of each Member State using the official language or languages of that Member State in such a way that the text is equivalent to the English original.
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sistemu Skupnosti za podeljevanje znaka za okolje
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community Ecolabel scheme
Splošni cilj uredbe o sistemu Skupnosti za podeljevanje znaka za okolje je spodbujati trajnostno proizvodnjo in potrošnjo proizvodov kot tudi trajnostno zagotavljanje in uporabo storitev.
The overall objective of the Regulation on a Community Ecolabel Scheme is to encourage sustainable production and consumption of products as well as sustainable provision and use of services.
Prostovoljni sistem, znak za okolje, je določen za usmerjanje potrošnikov k najboljšim ponudnikom na trgu.
A voluntary scheme, the Ecolabel set out to guide consumers towards the top performers in the market.
Poročevalka za to mnenje pozdravlja predlog Komisije za revidiranje sistema za podeljevanje znaka za okolje ter prizadevanja za obravnavanje slabosti sedanjega sistema.
Your rapporteur for this opinion welcomes the Commission’s proposal to revise the Ecolabel scheme and the efforts to address shortcomings of the current system.
Znak za okolje je del akcijskega načrta za trajnostno potrošnjo in proizvodnjo ter trajnostno industrijsko politiko.
The Ecolabel is part of the Action Plan on Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy.
Poročevalka ob poudarjanju splošne pomembnosti akcijskega načrta v celoti podpira splošne cilje predloga o znaku za okolje.
Underlining the general importance of the Action Plan, your rapporteur fully supports the general objectives of the proposal on the Ecolabel.
V tem okviru so dobrodošla prizadevanja za krepitev sedanjega sistema z zniževanjem stroškov in birokracije ter boljšim poznavanjem sistema.
In this context, efforts to strengthen the current scheme by making it less costly and bureaucratic and better known are welcome.
Prav tako je pomembno spodbujati usklajevanje z drugimi sistemi za podeljevanje znaka za okolje, da bi zagotovili skladnost in preprečili drobitev na notranjem trgu.
It is also important to encourage harmonisation with other Ecolabel schemes in order to ensure consistency and prevent fragmentation within the Internal Market.
Poročevalka pozdravlja odpravo letnih pristojbin, ki je še zlasti pomembna za mala in srednja podjetja.
Your rapporteur welcomes the abolition of the annual fees, which is particularly important for SMEs.
Enako pomembna je uvedba predloge za dokumente z merili, da bi bili uporabniku bolj prijazni, vendar pa želi poročevalka poudariti, da samo revizija „oblike“ meril brez pregleda njihove dejanske vsebine ne zadostuje.
The introduction of a template for criteria documents to make them more user-friendly is likewise important, but your rapporteur would like to emphasise that it is not sufficient to revise the “form” of the criteria without reviewing their actual content.
Vendar se zdi, da je revizija sistema za podeljevanje znaka za okolje v glavnem administrativna in postopkovna naloga ter ne obravnava pomanjkljivosti v načelih, ki podpirajo obstoječa merila za označevanje proizvodov z znakom za okolje.
However, the revision of the Ecolabel scheme seems to be a mainly administrative and procedural exercise, and does not address the flaws in the principles underpinning the existing Ecolabel criteria for products.
Sedanja merila v večini primerov ne odražajo dejanskega pristopa na osnovi življenjskega kroga.
In most cases, the current criteria do not reflect a true life cycle approach.
Poročevalka meni, da bi morala merila poleg končnih proizvodov obravnavati tudi vprašanja, kot so proizvodni proces, vzorci porabe, vedenje potrošnikov in podnebne spremembe.
It is the view of your rapporteur that the criteria should address not only the final products but also issues such as the manufacturing process, consumption patters, consumer behaviour and climate change.
Zato je potrebna temeljita revizija sedanjih meril za proizvode, da bi odražala širše videnje trajnostni in dejanski pristop na osnovi življenjskega kroga.
Hence, a fundamental revision of the current product criteria to reflect a broader view of sustainability and a true life cycle perspective is necessary.
Prav tako je pomembno, da je sistem za podeljevanje znaka za okolje v skladu z obstoječo zakonodajo Evropske unije (REACH, uredba o razvrščanju in označevanju) in se ne poskušajo sprejeti odstopajoči pristopi.
It is also important that the Ecolabel scheme is consistent with existing EU legislation (REACH, Classification and Labelling Regulation) and not to seek to adopt divergent approaches.
Poleg tega je izredno pomembno, da oblikovanje meril temelji na znanstvenih dokazih.
Moreover, it is of vital importance that the development of criteria is based on scientific evidence.
Zdi se, da sedanji predlog proizvodom, ki ne izvirajo iz Evropske unije, daje prednost v primerjavi s proizvodi iz EU.
The current proposal seems to provide products originating from outside the EU with an advantage compared to EU products.
Medtem ko se prvi lahko prijavijo pri pristojnem organu v katerikoli državi članici, kjer proizvod bo ali je bil dan v promet, je treba slednje prijaviti v državi članici, iz katere izvirajo.
While the former may register with a competent body in any of the Member States in which the product is to be or has been placed on the market, the latter must register in the Member State from which the product originates.
Poročevalka obžaluje, da želi Komisija pri predlogu razširitve sistema za podeljevanje znaka za okolje na omejen del živilskih proizvodov in pijač upoštevati zgolj nekaj omejenih stopenj v njihovem življenjskem krogu, in sicer predelavo, prevoz in pakiranje.
Your rapporteur regrets that the Commission, in proposing to extend the Ecolabel scheme to a limited fraction of food and drink products, only wishes to consider a few restricted stages in their lifecycle, namely processing, transport and packaging.
Kritični okoljski vplivi živilskih proizvodov in pijač nastanejo na stopnji kmetijske pridelave ter na stopnji potrošnje in nerazumljivo je, kako je lahko Komisija obe pomembni stopnji življenjskega kroga izključila iz presoje.
The critical environmental impacts of food and drink products arise at the agricultural production stage and at the consumption stage, and it is incomprehensible how both of these significant life-cycle stages are excluded from the assessment by the Commission.
Prav tako ni razumljivo, zakaj bi morala predelana hrana soditi na področje uporabe sistema za podeljevanje znaka za okolje, sveža hrana pa bi bila izključena.
It is equally incomprehensible why processed food should fall under the scope of the eco-label scheme while fresh food would be excluded.
Zato je poročevalka prepričana, da je treba ohraniti obstoječe izvzetje vse hrane in pijač iz uredbe.
This is why your rapporteur believes that existing exemption of all food and drinks from the Regulation should be maintained.
Trenutno obstajajo pomembne razlike v pristopu in razlagi med organi, ki vodijo v drobitev notranjega trga.
Currently there are significant differences in approach and interpretation between the authorities, leading to a fragmentation of the internal market.
Zato je pomembno zagotoviti, da pristojni nacionalni organi uskladijo postopek in časovno razporeditev obravnave vlog za znak za okolje.
Hence, it is important to ensure harmonisation of the process and timing of the treatment of applications for the Ecolabel through national competent bodies.
Prav tako pomemben je obstoj mehanizma, ki bo upošteval nepretrgano izboljševanje proizvodov.
It is also important to have a mechanism to take account of the continuous improvement of products.
Merila za proizvode so sedaj določena za dolga obdobja (npr. tri leta) in niso prilagodljiva.
Currently the product criteria are set for long periods (e.g. 3 years) and are inflexible.
Zato je težko nekoliko spremeniti formulacije, da bi vključevale npr. nove, bolj trajnostne sestavine in se prilagodile tehničnemu napredku, ne da bi morale opraviti celotni postopek ponovnega vlaganja vloge za znak za okolje.
Hence, it is difficult to change formulations slightly to include e.g. new, more sustainable ingredients and to adapt to technical progress without having to go through the whole process of re-applying for the eco-label.
In končno je potrebno okrepiti prizadevanja za približanje znaka za okolje potrošnikom, predvsem tudi z oblikovanjem uradne evropske spletne strani, ki bo ponujala vse ustrezne informacije in prakse.
Finally, it is important to step up efforts to promote the Ecolabel towards consumers, notably also by establishing a European official internet site presenting all relevant information and practices.
Ker potrošniki lahko spremenijo potrošniške vzorce in zahtevajo bolj trajnostne izbire, je poročevalka trdno prepričana, da bi jim morali pri tem pomagati.
Your rapporteur strongly believes that because the consumers have the power to change consumption patterns and demand more sustainable choices, it’s vital to help them be able to exercise this power.
Sedanji predlog je pomembno orodje v ta namen, predlagane spremembe pa bi ga še dodatno okrepile.
The current proposal is an important tool to this end, and the suggested amendments would further strengthen it.
Navedena merila morajo biti enostavna za razumevanje in uporabo ter zato omejena samo na najpomembnejše vplive proizvodov na okolje med njihovim celotnim življenjskim krogom, vključno s fazama proizvodnje in uporabe .
Those criteria should be simple to understand and to use and should therefore be limited to the most significant environmental impacts of products during their full lifecycle, including the phases of both manufacturing and use .
Pri določanju meril za znak za okolje je treba upoštevati celoten življenjski cikel izdelkov.
The full life cycle of the products needs to be taken into account when setting the Ecolabel criteria.
(4a) Sistem za podeljevanje znaka za okolje mora upoštevati obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti, da bi se izognili odstopajočim pristopom za oceno varnosti.
(4a) The Ecolabel scheme should take into account existing Community legislation so as to avoid divergent approaches to safety assessment.
(7a) Da bi se povečala uporaba sistema Skupnosti za podeljevanje znaka za okolje v prihodnjih revizijah te uredbe, bo potreben dokončni premik od merila 10 % najboljših proizvodov k uvedbi sistema stopnjevanja v vsaki kategoriji izdelkov v pomoč potrošnikom, da bodo lahko sprejemali trajnostne izbire v potrošnji, ter za oblikovanje spodbud za proizvajalce, da bodo nenehno izboljševali svojo ponudbo.
(7a) In order to increase the use of the Community Ecolabel system in future revisions of this Regulation, there will be a need for a definite shift from the 10% best performing products criteria to the introduction of a gradation system in each product category to help consumers to make sustainable consumption choices and to create incentives to manufacturers to constantly improve their offer.
(9) Ozaveščenost javnosti o znaku Skupnosti za okolje je treba povečati s promocijskimi ukrepi, informacijskimi in izobraževalnimi kampanjami , da bi se potrošniki začeli zavedati pomena znaka in da bi lahko sprejemali premišljene odločitve.
(9) It is necessary to raise public awareness of the Community Ecolabel through promotion actions , information and education campaigns, in order to make consumers aware of the meaning of the label and to enable them to make informed choices.
(10) Da bi olajšali trženje proizvodov z znakom za okolje na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti ter se izognili zmedi pri potrošnikih, je treba tudi povečati skladnost med sistemom Skupnosti za podeljevanje znaka za okolje in nacionalnimi sistemi za podeljevanje znaka za okolje v Skupnosti ter oblikovati uradno spletno stran EU, ki bi združevala vse informacije in prakse o označevanju z znakom za okolje EU za potrošnike in bi bila razpoložljiva v vseh uradnih jezikih Skupnosti .
(10) In order to facilitate the marketing of products bearing environmental labels at national and Community level and to avoid confusing consumers, it is also necessary to enhance coherence between the Community Ecolabel scheme and national Ecolabel schemes in the Community , as well as to create an official EU internet site gathering together all EU ecolabelling information and practices for the information of consumers and available in all official languages of the Community.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba izdelke, ki nosijo znak za okolje Skupnosti ali nacionalni znak za okolje, promovirati na nacionalnih trgih.
In addition, products bearing the Community or national Ecolabel should be promoted on national markets .
(10a) Čeprav so se nacionalni znaki za okolje izkazali za uspešne pri dvigovanju ozaveščenosti potrošnikov, je treba priznati, da je cilj te uredbe na dolgi rok vzpostavitev znaka za okolje Skupnosti, ki bo nadomestil nacionalne in regionalne znake za okolje.
(10a) It should be recognised that, although national ecolabels have proved able to create awareness among consumers, the objective of this Regulation is to establish a Community Ecolabel in the long term that will replace national and regional ecolabels.
Znak za okolje je edini uradni sistem za celoten notranji trg.
The Ecolabel is the only formal scheme for the entire internal market.
Obstoječi nacionalni ali regionalni sistemi za podeljevanje znaka za okolje pokrivajo le del notranjega trga.
Existing national or regional ecolabel schemes cover the internal market only in part.
Namen nove uredbe je razširiti uporabo znaka za okolje, da bi tako preprečili širjenje sistemov za označevanje z znakom za okolje.
The new Regulation has the intention to extend the use of the Ecolabel to avoid the proliferation of environmental labelling schemes.
Zato se upoštevajo najpomembnejši, znanstveno dokazani vplivi proizvodov na okolje v njihovem celotnem življenjskem krogu, ki lahko vključujejo vpliv na podnebne spremembe, vpliv na naravo in biološko raznolikost, porabo energije in virov, nastajanje odpadkov, emisije v vse prvine okolja, onesnaževanje prek fizikalnih dejavnikov ter uporabo in izpust snovi.
To this end the most significant , scientifically proven environmental impacts during the full life cycle of products shall be considered , which may include the impact on climate change, impact on nature and biodiversity, energy and resource consumption, generation of waste, emissions to all environmental media, pollution through physical effects and use and release of substances.
Do ...* se obstoječa merila za znak za okolje pregledajo, da bi zagotovili njihovo popolno skladnost s pristopom na osnovi življenjskega cikla, opisanim v tem členu.
By ...*, the existing Ecolabel criteria for the different product groups shall be reviewed to ensure their full compliance with the life cycle approach outlined in this Article.
* 18 mesecev od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* 18 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Poleg tega uvodna izjava (4) zahteva, da morajo biti merila omejena na najpomembnejše vplive proizvodov na okolje.
In addition Recital (4) requires that the criteria should be limited to the most significant environmental aspects of products.
Člen 8 - odstavek 2 - točki b in c
Article 8 - paragraph 2 - points b and c
(b) po potrebi navede tri ključne okoljske značilnosti, ki jih je mogoče prikazati na znaku za okolje;
(b) indicate, where appropriate, the three key environmental characteristics that may be placed on the Ecolabel;
(c) določi obdobje veljavnosti meril in zahtev za ocenjevanje, ki ni daljše od dveh let ;
(c) specify the period of validity of the criteria and of the assessment requirements , which shall not exceed two years;
(ca) določi dopustno stopnjo raznolikosti izdelka v času veljavnosti.
(ca) specify the degree of product variability allowed during the period of validity .
Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 9 - paragraph 1 - subparagraph 1
Proizvajalci, uvozniki, ponudniki storitev ter trgovci na debelo in drobno, ki želijo uporabljati znak za okolje, se registrirajo pri enem izmed pristojnih organov iz člena 4 tiste države članice, v kateri je proizvod bil ali bo dan v promet, da bi znak za okolje lahko uporabljali.
In order to use the Ecolabel, manufacturers, importers, service providers, wholesalers or retailers who wish to use the Ecolabel shall register with one of the competent bodies referred to in Article 4 in any of the Member States in which the product is to be or has been placed on the market.
Cilj predloga spremembe je poenostaviti registracijo tako, da je proizvod (ne glede na njegovo poreklo) mogoče registrirati pri pristojnem organu katere koli države članice, kjer proizvod je ali bo dan na trg.
This amendment aims to simplify the registration by indicating that the registration shall (irrespective of where the product originates from) be made with a competent body in any of the Member States where the product is to be or has been placed on the market.
Predlog Komisije daje prednost proizvodom, ki ne izvirajo iz Evropske unije, v primerjavi s proizvodi iz EU: medtem ko se prvi lahko prijavijo pri pristojnem organu v katerikoli državi članici, kjer proizvod bo ali je bil dan v promet, je treba slednje prijaviti v državi članici, iz katere izvirajo.
The Commission’s proposal provides products originating from outside the EU with an advantage compared to EU products: the former may register with a competent body in any of the Member States in which the product is to be or has been placed on the market, whereas the latter must register in the Member State from which the product originates.
Ta predlog spremembe bi to napako popravil in vse proizvode obravnaval enako.
This amendment would rectify this anomaly and treat all products in an equal way.
Če je dokumentacija popolna , pristojni organ vsakemu proizvodu dodeli številko registracije.
Provided that the documentation is complete , the competent body shall assign a registration number to each product.
Če je dokumentacija odobrena , pristojni organ vsakemu proizvodu dodeli številko registracije.
Provided that the documentation is approved , the competent body shall assign a registration number to each product.
Pristojni organ zaključi svoj postopek v štirih mesecih od dneva predložitve vloge.
The competent body shall conclude its procedure within four months of the date of the application.
Pristojni organ, pri katerem je bil vložen zahtevek za registracijo, lahko za obdelavo registracije zaračuna pristojbino do največ 200 EUR .
The competent body to which an application for registration is made may charge a fee of up to € 200 for processing the registration.
Pristojni organ, pri katerem je bil vložen zahtevek za registracijo, lahko za obdelavo registracije zaračuna pristojbino do največ 1 000 EUR, ki je sorazmerna z velikostjo podjetja .
The competent body to which an application for registration is made may charge a fee of up to EUR 1000, proportionate to the size of the enterprise, for processing the registration.
(a) stroških v povezavi z informacijami in pomočjo, ki jih podjetjem daje pristojni organ;
(a) costs incurred in connection with the provision of information and assistance to enterprises by the competent body;
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da v okviru spodbujanja sistema ne zaračunajo pristojbine.
Member States may decide, as a means of promoting the scheme, not to charge a fee.
V EU je še vedno uveljavljenih le 26 skupin proizvodov in okoli 500 podjetij, ki proizvajajo izdelke z znakom za okolje.
There are still only 26 products groups established and around 500 companies producing Ecolabel products in the EU.
Pomanjkljivost trenutnega sistema je nizka ozaveščenost o znaku in slabo sprejemanje znaka v industriji.
The current scheme suffers from low awareness of the label and low uptake by industry.
Da bi spodbudili podjetja, zlasti srednje velika in majhna, pristojbina ob registraciji ne bi smela presegati 100 EUR.
In order to encourage companies, and especially SMEs, the registration fee should not exceed EUR 100.
Komisija lahko poveča samo največji znesek pristojbine iz člena 9(3) in spremeni priloge le, če služi povečanje za kritje stroškov registracije .
The Commission may only increase the maximum fee provided for in Article 9(3) and amend the Annexes as long as the increase is to cover the costs of registration .
Nejasno je, do kakšne mere lahko Komisija poviša najvišjo določeno pristojbino in pod katerimi pogoji.
It is unclear to what extent the Commission may increase the maximum and under what circumstances.
Da bi se izognili vsem nejasnostim glede tega, je najvišjo pristojbino mogoče povišati le za toliko, da se pokrije dejanske stroške za obdelavo registracije.
To avoid any uncertainty in this manner, the maximum fee may only be increased to cover the actual costs for processing the registration
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v skladu s točko 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund, in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
MNENJE ODBORA ZA REGIONALNI RAZVOJ....................................................................8
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT....................................8
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0023 – C6‑0040/2009 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0023 – C6‑0040/2009 ),
1. zlasti točke 26,
1. , and in particular point 26 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sprejete na usklajevalnem sestanku 17. julija 2008 o solidarnostnem skladu,
– having regard to the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008 on the Solidarity Fund,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6‑0106/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0106/2009 ),
z dne xx. februarja 2009
of xxx February 2009
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije, zlasti člena 4(3) uredbe,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund, and in particular Article 4(3) thereof