natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EFET, Energie-Control GmbH Austria, EPAGMA, EPIA, EREC, EREF, ESTIF, EUREC, Eurelectric, Eurosolar, EWEA, FoE, Greenpeace, Iberdrola, International Fuel Quality Center (IFQC), Misereor, Oxfam, UEPA, NSF - Bureau of Nordic Family Forestry, Vattenfall, Verbund - Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-Aktiengesellschaft, WWF, in mnogi drugi
EFET, Energie-Control GmbH Austria, EPAGMA, EPIA, EREC, EREF, ESTIF, EUREC, Eurelectric, Eurosolar, EWEA, FoE, Greenpeace, Iberdrola, International Fuel Quality Center (IFQC), Misereor, Oxfam, UEPA, NSF - Bureau of Nordic Family Forestry, Vattenfall, Verbund - Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-Aktiengesellschaft, WWF, and many more
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov ( KOM(2008)0019 – C6‑0046/2008 – 2008/0016(COD) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources ( COM(2008)0019 – C6‑0046/2008 – 2008/0016(COD) )
Spoštovana gospa predsednica
Dear Mr Chairman,
V pismu z dne 29. maja 2008 ste v skladu s členom 35(2) poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o točnosti pravne podlage omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 29 May 2008 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid.
Odbor je omenjeno vprašanje obravnaval na seji dne 26. junija 2008.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 26 June 2008.
V vašem pismu navajate, da naj bi se s predlogom sprememb, ki ga je vložil poročevalec vašega odbora, črtal člen 95, člen 175(1) Pogodbe ES pa bi ostal edina pravna podlaga.
According to your letter, an amendment tabled by the your committee's Rapporteur seeks to delete Article 95, leaving Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty as the sole legal basis.
Po obrazložitvi avtorja predloga sprememb je dvojna podlaga rezervirana za primere, kjer je več enako pomembnih ciljev; glavni cilj predlagane direktive je varovanje okolja, veljavni direktivi o energiji iz obnovljivih virov in o biogorivih sta bili obe sprejeti v skladu s členom 175.
The justification given by the author of the amendment is that a dual basis is reserved for extreme cases where several goals are equally important; the main aim of the proposed directive is environmental protection and the current Directive on Energy from Renewable Sources and the Biofuels Directive have both been adopted under Article 175.
Poleg tega poročevalec meni, da poglavitni cilj določb o biogorivih ni spodbujati trgovino – predpisani standardi namreč še zdaleč niso usklajeni – temveč opredeliti trajnostna merila.
Besides, according to the Rapporteur, biofuels provisions do not principally aim at facilitating trade - as the prescribed standards are far from harmonised - but at defining sustainability criteria.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti splošen člen pogodbe predstavlja zadostno pravno podlago, čeprav si zadevni ukrep podrejeno prizadeva tudi za doseganje cilja, ki je vključen v specifični člen pogodbe
According to the case-law of the Court of Justice, a general Treaty article constitutes a sufficient legal basis even though the measure in question also seeks, in a subordinate manner, to attain an aim sought by a specific Treaty article
Zadeva C-377/98, Nizozemska proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, [2001] Poročila Sodišča Evropskih skupnost I-7079, odstavka 27 in 28; Zadeva C-491/01 , British American Tobacco (Investments) in Imperial Tobacco [2002] PSES I-11453, odst.
Case C-377/98 Netherlands v. European Parliament and Council [2001] ECR I-7079, paras 27-28; Case C-491/01 British American Tobacco (Investments) and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paras 93-94. .
Glej Zadevo C-165/87 Komisija proti Svetu [1988] Zbirka odločb 5545, odst.
See, for instance, Case C-165/87 Commission v. Council [1988] ECR 5545, para.
Glej tudi Lenaerts and Van Nuffel (zal.
See also Lenaerts and Van Nuffel (ed.
Bray), Constitutional Law of the European Union, 2005, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 5-13. .
Bray), Constitutional Law of the European Union, 2005, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 5-013. .
Pravna podlaga, ki jo predlaga Komisija
The legal basis proposed by the Commission
Komisija predlaga uporabo dveh pravnih podlag, in sicer člena 175(1)
The Commission proposes to use two legal bases, namely Article 175(1)
— prostorsko načrtovanje,
— town and country planning,
— upravljanje s količinami vodnih virov ali ki vplivajo, neposredno ali posredno, na razpoložljivost teh virov,
— quantitative management of water resources or affecting, directly or indirectly, the availability of those resources,
— rabo zemljišč, razen ravnanja z odpadki,
— land use, with the exception of waste management;
— začasnih odstopanj in/ali
— temporary derogations, and/or
— finančne podpore iz Kohezijskega sklada, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 161.
— financial support from the Cohesion Fund set up pursuant to Article 161.
Člen 174
Article 174
Okoljska politika Skupnosti prispeva k uresničevanju naslednjih
Community policy on the environment shall contribute to pursuit of the following
— ohranjanje, varstvo in izboljšanje kakovosti okolja;
— preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment,
— skrbna in preudarna raba naravnih virov;
— prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources,
— spodbujanje ukrepov na mednarodni ravni za reševanje regionalnih ali svetovnih okoljskih problemov.
— promoting measures at international level to deal with regional or worldwide environmental problems.
Cilj okoljske politike Skupnosti je doseči visoko raven varstva, pri čemer se upošteva raznolikost razmer v posameznih regijah Skupnosti.
Community policy on the environment shall aim at a high level of protection taking into account the diversity of situations in the various regions of the Community.
Politika temelji na previdnostnem načelu in na načelih, da je treba delovati preventivno, da je treba okoljsko škodo prednostno odpravljati pri viru in da mora plačati povzročitelj obremenitve.
It shall be based on the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventive action should be taken, that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source and that the polluter should pay.
V tej zvezi usklajevalni ukrepi, ki ustrezajo zahtevam varstva okolja, vključujejo, kadar je to primerno, zaščitno klavzulo, ki državam članicam dovoljuje, da iz negospodarskih okoljskih razlogov sprejmejo začasne ukrepe, za katere velja nadzorni postopek Skupnosti.
In this context, harmonisation measures answering environmental protection requirements shall include, where appropriate, a safeguard clause allowing Member States to take provisional measures, for non-economic environmental reasons, subject to a Community inspection procedure.
Pri oblikovanju svoje okoljske politike Skupnost upošteva:
In preparing its policy on the environment, the Community shall take account of:
— razpoložljive znanstvene in tehnične podatke;
— available scientific and technical data,
— okoljske razmere v različnih regijah Skupnosti;
— environmental conditions in the various regions of the Community,
— možne koristi in stroške ukrepanja ali neukrepanja;
— the potential benefits and costs of action or lack of action,
— gospodarski in socialni razvoj Skupnosti kot celote in uravnotežen razvoj njenih regij.
— the economic and social development of the Community as a whole and the balanced development of its regions.
V okviru svojih pristojnosti Skupnost in države članice sodelujejo s tretjimi državami in pristojnimi mednarodnimi organizacijami.
Within their respective spheres of competence, the Community and the Member States shall cooperate with third countries and with the competent international organisations.
Prejšnji pododstavek ne posega v pristojnost držav članic glede pogajanj v mednarodnih organih in glede sklepanja mednarodnih sporazumov. in člena 95
The previous subparagraph shall be without prejudice to Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude international agreements. and Article 95
Zgornji usklajevalni ukrepi v ustreznih primerih vključujejo zaščitno klavzulo, ki dovoljuje državam članicam, da zaradi enega ali več neekonomskih razlogov iz člena 30 sprejmejo začasne ukrepe, ki so predmet nadzornega postopka Skupnosti. .
The harmonisation measures referred to above shall, in appropriate cases, include a safeguard clause authorising the Member States to take, for one or more of the non-economic reasons referred to in Article 30, provisional measures subject to a Community control procedure. .
Njena neobičajno dolga obrazložitev uporabe teh dveh pravnih podlag je sledeča:
Its unusually lengthy justification for the use of this dual legal basis is as follows:
Predlog bo dan na podlagi člena 175(1) Pogodbe v povezavi s členom 95.
"The Proposal will be made on the basis of Article 175(1) of the Treaty in combination with Article 95.
Čeprav se daje prednost enotni pravni podlagi, je dvojna pravna podlaga primerna, kadar ukrep vsebuje določbe, ki temeljijo na različnih delih Pogodbe.
While a single legal base is preferred, it is recognised that a dual legal base is appropriate where a measure contains provisions based on different parts of the Treaty.
V obeh pravnih podlagah je predvidena uporaba postopka soodločanja.
Both these legal bases imply the use of the co-decision procedure.
Večina predloga sodi na področje uporabe člena 175(1) (okolje).
The majority of the Proposal falls under Article 175(1) (environment).
Ta člen daje Skupnosti pooblastila, da ukrepa, da bi ohranila, varovala in izboljšala kakovost okolja, varovala zdravje ljudi ter skrbno in preudarno izkoriščala naravne vire.
This Article gives the Community power to act to preserve, protect and improve the quality of the environment, protect human health and make prudent and rational use of natural resources.
Ta direktiva si prizadeva za dosego teh ciljev.
These objectives are pursued by this Directive.
Vendar členi 15, 16 in 17 predloga nalagajo državam članicam zavezujoče obveznosti glede trajnosti pogonskih biogoriv in drugih tekočih biogoriv.
However, Articles 15, 16 and 17 of the Proposal impose binding obligations on Member States regarding the sustainability of biofuels and other bioliquids.
Medtem ko je varovanje okolja očiten cilj meril trajnosti, direktiva državam članicam tudi preprečuje, da bi sprejele nekatere ukrepe, ki bi ovirali trgovino z biogorivi ali surovinami.
While the sustainability criteria themselves obviously pursue an aim of environmental protection, the Directive also prevents Member States from adopting certain measures which would obstruct trade in biofuels or raw materials.
Tako je cilj direktive popolna uskladitev trajnostnih meril za biogoriva, da se zagotovi, da nobeno merilo, ki ga posamično sprejmejo države članice, ne bo predstavljalo ovire za trgovino med državami članicami.
The Directive thus aims for a complete harmonisation of biofuel sustainability criteria in order to ensure that no criteria adopted individually by Member States may constitute an obstacle to trade between Member States.
Zato je primarni cilj za ta element direktive notranji trg.
For this element of the Directive, the internal market is therefore considered to be the primary objective.
Te ocene ne spremeni dejstvo, da je varovanje okolja prav tako pomemben cilj, saj člen 95(3) ES izrecno predpisuje visoko raven varovanja okolja, ki mora biti cilj ukrepov za dokončno vzpostavitev notranjega trga.
This assessment is not altered by the fact that environmental protection is also an important goal, since Article 95(3) EC expressly provides for a high level of protection of the environment to be aimed for in measures to complete the internal market.
Zato Komisija meni, da določbe usklajenih standardov za trajnost biogoriv sodijo na področje uporabe člena 95 (notranji trg).
The Commission therefore considers that the provisions of harmonised standards for biofuel sustainability fall under Article 95 (internal market).
Na splošno je obnovljiva energija dokaj enakovredno nadomestilo za konvencionalno energijo in se dobavlja po enakih infrastrukturnih in logističnih sistemih.
In general, renewable energy is a close substitute for conventional energy and is supplied through the same infrastructure and logistic systems.
Vse države članice že uporabljajo obnovljivo energijo in vse so se že odločile, da bodo povečale njen delež.
All Member States already use renewable energy and all have already decided to increase renewable energy's share.
Zato predlog ne bo bistveno vplival na odločitev držav članic glede izbora virov energije ali na splošno strukturo njihove oskrbe z energijo in ne sodi na področje uporabe člena 175(2) Pogodbe.
For these reasons, the proposal will not significantly affect Member States' choice between different energy sources or the general structure of their energy supply and does not fall under Article 175(2) of the Treaty."
Cilj in vsebina predloga uredbe
Aim and content of the proposal for a regulation
Predlagana direktiva skuša določiti skupni okvir za spodbujanje energije iz obnovljivih virov.
The proposed directive seeks to establish a common framework for the promotion of energy from renewable sources.
Določena so tudi pravila za potrdila o izvoru, upravne postopke in povezovanje v elektroenergetske omrežje v zvezi z energijo iz obnovljivih virov.
It lays down rules relating to guarantees of origin, administrative procedures and electricity grid connections in relation to energy from renewable sources.
Določena so merila okoljske trajnosti za pogonska biogoriva in druga tekoča biogoriva.
It establishes environmental sustainability criteria for bio fuels and other bio liquids
Cilj direktive je določiti skupni zavezujoč cilj 20-odstotnega deleža obnovljivih virov energije v porabi energije in zavezujoč cilj najmanj 10-odstotnega deleža biogoriv v prometu, ki naj bi jih dosegla vsaka država članica, ter zavezujoče nacionalne cilje do leta 2020 v skladu s skupnim 20-odstotnim ciljem EU.
The future directive aims to establish an overall binding target of a 20% share of renewable energy sources in energy consumption and a 10% binding minimum target for bio fuels in transport to be achieved by each Member State, as well as binding national targets by 2020 in line with the overall EU target of 20%.
Od 57 uvodnih izjav se samo ena, uvodna izjava (53), nanaša posebej na notranji trg: določa, da bi se morala člena 15 in 17 obravnavati, kot da temeljita na členu 95 Pogodbe ES, saj zagotavljata pravilno delovanje notranjega trga z uskladitvijo pogojev glede trajnosti, ki jih morajo za nekatere namene izpolnjevati pogonska biogoriva in druga tekoča biogoriva, in s tem pospeševanje trgovine med državami članicami s pogonskimi biogorivi in drugimi tekočimi biogorivi, ki te pogoje izpolnjujejo.
Of the 57 recitals, only one, recital (53), refers specifically to the internal market: it states that Articles 15 to 17 should be considered as being based on Article 95 EC because they ensure the proper functioning of internal market by harmonising the conditions of sustainability that biofuels and other bioliquids must meet for certain purposes and thus facilitating trade between Member States in compliant biofuels and bioliquids.
Ostale uvodne izjave in normativne določbe (razen končnih določb o poročanju, spremljanju, spremembah in razveljavitvah, komitologiji in začetku veljavnosti) vse obravnavajo ohranjanje, varovanje in izboljšanje kakovosti okolja ter skrbno in preudarno rabo naravnih virov v smislu člena 133 Pogodbe ES.
The remainder of the recitals and the enacting terms (apart from the final provisions on reporting, monitoring, amendments and repeal, comitology and entry into force) are all concerned with preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment and the prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources within the meaning of Article 174 of the EC Treaty.
Celo členi od 15 do 17, ki bi morali po mnenju Komisije temeljiti na členu 95, obravnavajo varovanje okolja.
Even Articles 15 to 17, which the Commission claims should be based on Article 95, are concerned with environment protection.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na seji 28. junija 2008 je soglasno
At its meeting of 27 June 2008 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Titus Corlăţean (podpredsednik), Diana Wallis (pripravljalka mnenja), Sharon Bowles, Carlo Casini, Monica Frassoni, Neena Gill, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Eva Lichtenberger, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, József Szájer in Ieke van den Burg. sprejel priporočilo, da je najustreznejša pravna podlaga člen 175(1) Pogodbe ES in da ni potrebe po sklicevanju na člen 95.
The following were present for the final vote: Giuseppe Gargani (chairman), Titus Corlăţean (vice-chairman), Diana Wallis (draftswoman), Sharon Bowles, Carlo Casini, Monica Frassoni, Neena Gill, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Eva Lichtenberger, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, József Szájer and Ieke van den Burg. , to recommend that you that the most appropriate legal basis is Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty and that there is no need to add any reference to Article 95.
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
Fosilna goriva so že dolgo časa življenjska tekočina družbe.
Fossil fuels have been the lifeblood of society for a long period of time.
Modernizacija, kot jo poznamo, ne bi bila mogoče brez obilnih zalog poceni nafte, premoga in plina.
Modernisation as we know it would not have been possible without abundant supplies of cheap oil, coal and gas.
To obdobje pa bo kmalu minilo.
However, this period will soon be over.
Potrebno je temeljito preoblikovanje naših energetskih in prometnih sistemov – zaradi energetske varnosti in gospodarstva, predvsem pa zaradi podnebnih sprememb.
A thorough transformation of our energy and transportation systems is needed – for the sake of energy security and economics, but first and foremost because of Climate Change.
Dolgo let se je na podnebne spremembe gledalo predvsem kot na okoljevarstveno vprašanje.
For many years, Climate Change was seen primarily as an environmental issue.
Danes pa se na splošno priznava, da podnebne spremembe vplivajo na vse sektorje družbe in lahko, če se z njimi učinkovito ne spoprimemo, pripeljejo do uničujočih posledic za družbo.
Today, however, there is broad recognition that Climate Change affects all sectors of society and, if not tackled vigorously, may lead to catastrophic consequences for society.
EU na razpotju
EU at the crossroad
EU je na razpotju kar zadeva prihodnost energije.
The EU is at a crossroad concerning the future of energy.
Za energetske in podnebne izzive ni čudežnega zdravila.
There is no silver bullet to the energy and climate challenge.
Slediti je treba večrazsežnostnemu pristopu, katerega poglavitni stebri bodo:
A multi-pronged approach must be pursued where the main pillars will be:
- povečana energetska učinkovitost,
- enhanced energy efficiency,
- postopno opuščanje fosilnih goriv in
- the gradual phase-out of fossil fuels and
- velike naložbe v raziskave, razvoj in uporabo nadomestnih virov energije, predvsem obnovljivih virov energije.
- massive investments in research, development and deployment of alternative energy sources, first and foremost renewable energy .
Direktive Komisije EU o obnovljivih virih energije je nadaljevanje sklepa Evropskega sveta iz marca 2007.
The EU Commission Renewables Directive is a follow-up to the European Council decision from March, 2007.
Namen predloga direktive je določiti splošen obvezujoč cilj 20 % deleža obnovljivih virov energije v porabi energije leta 2020 in enako obvezujoč cilj 10 % deleža obnovljive energije v sektorju prometa do leta 2020 , pa tudi obvezujoče nacionalne cilje do leta 2020, ki bodo v skladu s splošnim 20-odstotnim ciljem EU.
The proposal aims to establish an overall binding target of a 20% share of renewable energy sources in energy consumption in 2020 and an equally binding target of a 10% share of renewable energy in the transport sector by 2020 , as well as binding national targets by 2020 in line with the overall EU target of 20%.
Predlog Komisije je dobrodošel.
The Commission proposal is welcome.
Parlament je nedavno v več poročilih pozval k povečanju ravni obnovljivih virov energije v energetski mešanici EU ter celo razmišlja o obvezujočem cilju 25 %.
Parliament has in several reports recently asked for an increase in the level of renewable energy in the EU energy mix, and even considered a binding target of 25%.
To mnenje odbora ENVI je pripravljeno v okviru okrepljenega sodelovanja z glavnim odborom ITRE.
This opinion from ENVI is prepared under the provision of enhanced cooperation with the lead committee, ITRE.
V dogovoru s poročevalcem odbora ITRE se bo mnenje odbora ENVI osredotočalo predvsem na predlagana merila okoljske trajnosti za biogoriva.
In agreement with the rapporteur in ITRE, the ENVI opinion will focus mainly on the proposed sustainability criteria for biofuels.
Bioenergije – del rešitve
Bioenergy – part of the solution
Kot drugi obnovljivi viri energije lahko tudi bioenergija pomembno prispeva k blažitvi podnebnih sprememb in energetski varnosti.
Like other renewable sources, bioenergy can make valuable contributions in climate mitigation and energy security.
Ima dve odločilni prednosti.
It has two decisive advantages.
Prvič: biomasa je shranjena energija ; pridobivati jo je mogoče kadarkoli kot fosilna goriva.
First, biomass is stored energy ; like fossil fuels, it can be drawn on at any time.
Drugič: biomaso je mogoče proizvajati v vse oblike energentov za sodobna gospodarstva – električno energijo, plin, tekoča goriva in toploto.
Second, biomass can produce all forms or carriers of energy for modern economies: electricity, gas, liquid fuels, and heat.
Bioenergija zagotavlja delovna mesta na podeželju in lahko poveča donosnost v sektorjih kmetijstva, predelave hrane in gozdarstva.
Bio-energy provides rural jobs, and can increase profitability in the agriculture, food-processing and forestry sectors.
Nasadi biomase lahko pripomorejo k obnavljanju poškodovanih zemljišč, gojenje dreves, grmičevja ali trav pa lahko odpravi poškodbe prsti, pri čemer proizvodnja in prodaja energije predstavljata dodano vrednost.
Biomass plantations can help to restore degraded lands and growing trees, shrubs or grasses can reverse damage to soils, with energy production and sales as a valuable bonus.
Sočasno gre pri bioenergiji kot takšni za intenzivno izkoriščanje tal in s tem povezani vplivi na okolje so veliki.
Bio-energy is at the same time inherently land-intensive and the associated environmental impacts are significant.
Nekateri od pomislekov, ki so povezani s tem, se nanašajo na krčenje gozdov, izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti, izčrpavanje hranilnih snovi v prsti in prekomerno uporabo vode.
Some key concerns relate to deforestation, loss of biodiversity, depletion of soil nutrients, and excessive use of water.
Nekateri pozitivni vplivi na okolje vključujejo obnovitev opustošenih zemljišč, oblikovanje nadomestnih možnosti za uporabo zemljišč ter sinergije pri dobavi vlaknin in drugih neenergetskih proizvodov.
Some positive environmental impacts include restoration of degraded land, creation of complementary land use options, and synergies in the provision of fibre and other non-energy products.
Pri sodobnem konceptu biorafinerij gre za visoko učinkovite kmetijsko–industrijske komplekse, ki ustvarjajo različne proizvode – hrano, krmo, gorivo in drugo – in s tem maksimizirajo vrednost zemljišč in surovin na biološki osnovi.
The modern concept of a bio-refinery is a highly efficient agro-industrial complex that creates multiple products—food, feed, fuel, fiber and more—thus maximizing the value of land resources and bio-based materials.