natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalka meni, da kljub temu, da bi bilo treba proračun za teritorialno sodelovanje bistveno povečati, ne bo nikoli zadosten, da bi lahko iz njega financirali velike načrte za čezmejno ali transnacionalno infrastrukturo, ki jo Evropa potrebuje na področju prometa, energije, novih tehnologij in komunikacije.
In your rapporteur’s view, although the territorial cooperation budget should be substantially increased, it will never be sufficient to fund the major cross-border or transnational infrastructure projects which Europe needs in the transport, energy and new communication technology spheres.
Da bi se resnično udejanjilo načelo teritorialne kohezije in povečala evropska dodana vrednost uporabe sredstev, dodeljenih v okviru ciljev konvergenčnosti ter konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja, je potrebna večja komplementarnost med ciljem teritorialnega sodelovanja in splošnimi cilji.
If the principle of territorial cohesion is to be implemented properly, and in order to increase the European added value of the funding allocated under the ‘convergence’ and ‘competitiveness and employment’ objectives, greater complementarity between the ‘territorial cooperation’ objective and the mainstream is essential.
Poročevalka zato predlaga, naj se na začetku načrtovanja ubere „teritorialni“ pristop, v skladu s katerim bi sredstva, namenjena za konvergenco ter konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje, usmerili v vnaprej določene in sprejete prednostne projekte, kot so vseevropska prometna omrežja, ki se bodo izvajali s partnerji pri teh programih, v skladu z načeli upravljanja na več ravneh in partnerstva.
The proposal is, therefore, that at the beginning of the programming period ‘territorial’ approach should be used to channel ‘convergence’ and ‘competitiveness and employment’ funding towards a number of priority projects like Trans-European Networks of Transports which have been identified in advance and agreed with the relevant partners, in keeping with the principles of multi-level governance and partnership.
Nazadnje poročevalka vztraja pri pomembnosti izkušenj iz multiregionalnih operativnih programov, kot sta programa „Loire“ in „Massif Central“ v Franciji, ki slonita na skupnem teritorialnem temelju.
Finally, your rapporteur would like to emphasise the importance of the experiments conducted as part of pluri-regional operational programmes, such as the ‘Loire’ or ‘Massif Central’ programmes in France, which have a shared territorial basis.
Sprejeti teritorialni pristop za druge politike Skupnosti
Adopting a territorial approach when implementing other Community policies
Makroregionalne strategije za Baltik in Podonavje so pri številnih akterjih vzbudile navdušenje in strah.
The response to the macro-regional strategies, for the Baltic and for the Danube, has been a mixture of enthusiasm and reservations.
Poročevalka želi opozoriti, da te strategije niso nove medvladne strukture za sodelovanje, ki jih centralno upravljajo države članice, pa tudi ne nov, neopredeljen cilj Skupnosti, odvisen od povezav z regionalno politiko.
Your rapporteur would like to point out that these strategies are neither a new form of intergovernmental cooperation, managed solely by the central authorities in the Member States concerned, nor a new, autonomous unidentified Community object which has no links with regional policy.
Pravilo treh "ne" je temeljno pravilo: nobene nove institucije, nobene nove uredbe, nobene nove proračunske postavke za makroregionalne strategije.
The ‘three nos’ rule is fundamental: no new institutions, no new rules and no new budget headings for the macro-regional strategies.
Vendar pa si logika makroregij (zaenkrat še eksperimentalna logika sodelovanje pri skupnih projektih, ki zadevajo veliko ozemlje, katere cilj je izkoriščanje prednosti celostnega in večsektorskega pristopa v okviru skupnih strateških dejavnosti z uporabo že obstoječih sredstev) na podlagi danih rezultatov zasluži posebno pozornost.
However, the thinking behind the macro-regions, an experimental approach based on coordination around joint projects which affect a very broadly defined territory, the aim being to exploit the advantages offered by an integrated, multi-sectoral approach involving joint strategic measures receiving support from existing funds, warrants special consideration, given the results achieved.
Kljub temu, da se v Evropi ne zahteva oblikovanje makroregij, bi lahko sistem upravljanja transnacionalnega sklopa pomagal pri usklajevanju stališč, opredelitev in usmerjenosti teh strategij z določanjem območij, kjer bi lahko bile koristne in zaželene.
Although there is no suggestion of establishing macro-regions throughout Europe, the transnational governance system could be used to coordinate the work of devising, framing and steering these strategies, by identifying where they would be useful and desirable.
Prav tako mora transnacionalni sklop v svojem stališču upoštevati možna usklajevanja z drugimi velikimi strategijami Skupnosti, kot sta vseevropsko prometno omrežje in celostna pomorska politika.
By the same token, transnational governance must take account of the scope for coordination with other major Community strategies, such as the trans-European networks and the integrated maritime policy.
Sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah je pomanjkljivo ter se pojavljajo težave pri njegovem izvajanju, zlasti zaradi pomanjkanja sinergij med uredbami o različnih skladih (FEDER, IEPV, IAP, FED) ter zaradi težav upravljanja.
Finally, cooperation at the Union’s external borders is characterised by shortcomings and implementation problems, in particular as a result of the lack of synergy between the regulations governing the various funds (ERDF, ENPI, IAP, EDF) and governance problems.
Zadevni generalni direktorati Evropske komisije morajo boljše uskladiti svoje dejavnosti na tem področju.
The onus is on the relevant Commission DGs to coordinate their efforts in this area more effectively.
Spodbujati ustanovitev evropskih združenj za teritorialno sodelovanje (EZTS)
Encouraging the establishment of European Groupings for Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs)
Posebna uredba je leta 2006 uvedla pravno sredstvo za pospeševanje teritorialnega sodelovanja: evropsko združenje za teritorialno sodelovanje (EZTS).
In 2006 a separate regulation established a legal tool to facilitate territorial cooperation, the European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation (EGTC).
EZTS je mogoče uporabiti za vse tri sklope teritorialnega sodelovanja in predstavlja edinstven instrument teritorialnega upravljanja.
The EGTC can be used in connection with all three aspects of territorial cooperation and represents a unique instrument for territorial governance.
Njegova uvedba je potekala med pogajanji o zakonodajnem svežnju za sedanji večletni finančni okvir (2007–2013).
It was introduced at the time of the negotiations on the legislative package for the current multiannual financial framework (2007-2013).
Ta uredba nacionalnim, regionalnim in lokalnim oblastem omogoča ustanovitev skupnih pravnih oseb za izvajanje programov in projektov sodelovanja.
The regulation enables national, regional or local authorities to set up joint groupings with legal personality in order to implement cooperation programmes and projects.
Prav tako pomembno prispeva k modelu upravljanja na več ravneh.
It thus makes a significant contribution to the multi-level governance model.
Izkušnje že ustanovljenih EZTS ali tistih, ki še nastajajo, kažejo, da ta instrument deluje zadovoljivo.
Experience gained or in the process of being gained with EGTCs shows that this instrument works satisfactorily.
Zadovoljil je potrebe regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti po strukturiranem sodelovanju na področju financ, pravnega statusa in upravljanja na več ravneh ter celo presegel pričakovanja evropskih zakonodajalcev.
It has met the need expressed by regional and local authorities for structured cooperation covering financing, the legal status of projects and multi-level governance and it has exceeded even the European legislator’s expectations.
Kljub temu pa je nujno boljše poznavanje EZTS med lokalnimi in regionalnimi oblastmi v EU.
However, it is essential that local and regional authorities in the EU should be better informed about EGTCs.
Poleg tega obstaja veliko drugih izzivov, predvsem v zvezi s pravnimi in organizacijskimi vprašanji ali dostopom do financiranja, s katerimi se zlasti v začetni fazi spopadajo EZTS (na primer težave v zvezi z državo sedeža in dolgotrajni postopki registracije).
Moreover, EGTCs faced quite a few other challenges, mainly legal, organisational or relating to access to financing, in particular during their start-up phase (such as problems in connection with the country of establishment and very lengthy registration procedures).
Poročevalka želi opozoriti na nekaj težav, ki jih je zaznal Odbor regij: treba je pojasniti status EZTS v pravnih sistemih držav članic, porajajo se težave pri pridobitvi dovoljenja za ustanovitev EZTS med akterji iz države članice in države, ki ni članica EU, potrebna je prenova člena 4(3), da bi zagotovili strogo spoštovanje trimesečnega roka,v katerem mora država članica odobriti ali zavrniti ustanovitev EZTS, in treba je poenostaviti pravne določbe, ki zadevajo osebje in davčni sistem EZTS.
Your rapporteur would like to join with the Committee of the Regions in drawing attention to a number of problems: the need to clarify the status of EGTCs under the legal systems of the Member States, problems in securing authorisation to establish EGTCs involving actors situated in a Member State and a country outside the EU, the need to reword Article 4(3) in order to ensure that the three‑month time limit within which Member States must approve or otherwise the establishment of an EGTC is strictly complied with and a simplification of the legal provisions governing the staff of and tax arrangements for EGTCs.
Poleg tega morajo pravila za dostop do drugih evropskih skladov bolj upoštevati posebno naravo EZTS, ki niso preprosto samo partner, ampak večstranski in večnarodni evropski organ.
In addition, the rules governing access to other European funds must take better account of the specific nature of EGTCs, not simply as a partner, but as a multilateral and multinational European body.
Dodelitev splošnih subvencij EZTS, da bi lahko neposredno upravljala strukturne sklade v skladu s strategijo, ki jo določa program, bi olajšala izvajanje projektov in spodbujala ustanovitev novih EZTS.
Finally, the award of global grants to EGTCs, in order to enable them to manage structural funds directly, in keeping with the strategy defined by the programme, would facilitate the implementation of projects and foster the establishment of new EGTCs.
Cilj 3 omogoča kompleksno in večdimenzionalno sodelovanje, ki združuje partnerje iz različnih držav članic.
Objective 3 provides for complex, multidimensional cooperation between partners from different Member States.
Ti izzivi zahtevajo posebno zakonodajno ureditev, ki bi dejansko poenostavila izvajanje.
These constraints call for specific regulation which genuinely simplifies implementation.
Poročevalka predlaga vrsto ukrepov, ki jih zahtevajo akterji na terenu: poenostavitev pravil revizije in nadzora, bolj sistematično določanje pavšala za stroške, opredelitev natančnejših pravil za upravičenost do sredstev Skupnosti, zagotovitev prožnosti pri uporabi samodejnega prenehanja prevzetih obveznosti, povečanje tehnične pomoči, da bi se upravni organi lahko osredotočili bolj na strateško spremljanje projektov kot pa na administrativno ustreznost kandidatur.
Your rapporteur is proposing a series of measures requested by actors on the ground, such as a simplification of the audit and control rules, the more systematic use of standard-rate costing, the definition of more detailed rules governing eligibility for Community support, more flexible application of automatic decommitment procedures, and an increase in the technical assistance, so that the managing authorities can place the emphasis on the strategic supervision of projects rather than on the conformity of applications with the administrative rules.
Poročevalka opozarja, da je najpomembnejša poenostavitev stabilnost pravil.
Your rapporteur would like to stress, however, that the form of simplification most urgently required is rule stability.
Ena od pogostih težav pri izvajanju teritorialnega sodelovanja je neodločenost zasebnih akterjev pri kompleksnosti in tveganjih, ki spremljajo te projekte.
Finally, one problem frequently encountered in connection with the implementation of territorial cooperation is the reluctance of private actors to become involved, given the complexity of such projects and the risks inherent in them.
Poročevalka torej poziva Komisijo, naj bolj vključi te akterje, zlasti z oblikovanjem finančnega sistema po modelu pobud JEREMIE in JESSICA za lažje izvajanje čezmejnih projektov, ki so vektorji gospodarskega razvoja, ter ustvarjanjem javno-zasebnih partnerstev.
Your rapporteur is therefore urging the Commission to involve these actors more closely, in particular by establishing financial engineering systems, along the lines of JEREMIE and JESSICA, in order to facilitate cross-border projects which are vectors of economic development and the establishment of public-private partnerships.
Omogočiti prepoznavnost teritorialnega sodelovanja
Raising the profile of territorial cooperation
Na teritorialno sodelovanje zlasti slabo vpliva splošna težava strukturnih skladov: pomanjkanje prepoznavnosti.
Territorial cooperation suffers from a particularly acute form of the more general problem affecting the Structural Funds: their low profile.
Izzivi teritorialnega sodelovanja niso v ospredju niti pri državljanih v njihovem vsakdanjem življenju, niti pri nacionalnih, regionalnih ali lokalnih javnih organih držav članic in tudi ne pri načrtovanju dolgoročnih politik evropskih institucij.
Members of the public in their everyday lives, central, regional or local authorities in the Member States, the European institutions planning long-term policies: all are blissfully unaware of the issues at stake in territorial cooperation.
Na vsaki izmed teh treh ravni je treba storiti več, če želimo, da teritorialno sodelovanje postane bolj prepoznavno.
It is necessary to take action at all three levels if territorial cooperation is to become more ‘visible’.
Odgovor na ta izziv je treba sprejeti v dveh oblikah:
The response to this challenge must take two forms:
- teritorialno sodelovanje, ta velika evropska ideja, mora za vse državljane postati simbolično utelešenje EU;
- the great European idea of territorial cooperation must become the symbolic embodiment of the EU for all its citizens;
- oblikovalci politike in uradniki na vseh ravneh morajo poznati praktične vidike teritorialnega sodelovanja, ki lahko vplivajo na njihovo delo.
- policy-makers and public servants at all levels must become acquainted with the practical aspects of territorial cooperation which may affect their work.
Poročevalka zahteva, naj Komisija razmisli zlasti o možnostih za boljšo prepoznavnost EZTS med akterji teritorialnega sodelovanja in državljani.
Your rapporteur is therefore calling on the Commission to consider, in particular, ways of raising the profile of EGTCs with territorial cooperation stakeholders and the public.
Poleg tega bi okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju izobraževanja in kulture prispevalo k uresničevanju ciljev pametne in vključujoče rasti strategije Evropa 2020 in posledično zagotovilo višjo raven udeležbe državljanov in nevladnih organizacij ter prispevalo k večji prepoznavnosti teritorialnega sodelovanja in odpravljanju meja v glavah, ki ovirajo zbliževanje državljanov.
Also, while helping to fulfil the Europe 2020 strategy’s objective of intelligent and inclusive growth, to increase cooperation on education and culture would raise the level of participation of citizens and NGOs as well as contribute to the raising of the profile of territorial cooperation and breaking down the ‘mental borders’ that still set citizens apart from one another;
Potrebno je boljše usklajevanje komunikacije med akterji, vključenimi v proces izvajanja teritorialnega sodelovanja, recimo s sprejetjem enakega znaka za vizualno prepoznavnost (logotip).
Finally, more effective communication among all the actors involved in implementing territorial cooperation is also essential - a worthwhile first step would be the use of a single logo, for example.
Komisija bi lahko s pomočjo INTERACT na obmejnih območjih predvidela tudi komunikacijsko kampanjo.
The Commission might also envisage a communication campaign, in conjunction with INTERACT, in border regions.
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Haralampos Angurakis (Charalampos Angourakis), Sophie Auconie, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Juozas Imbrasas, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Miroslav Mikolášik, Franz Obermayr, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Mihailis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Lambert van Nistelrooij, Oldřich Vlasák, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Charalampos Angourakis, Sophie Auconie, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Juozas Imbrasas, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Miroslav Mikolášik, Franz Obermayr, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Michail Tremopoulos, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Oldřich Vlasák, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Britta Reimers, Ivo Strejček
Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Britta Reimers, Ivo Strejček
o poročilu o izvajanju programov kohezijske politike 2007–2013 za leto 2010
on the Report 2010 on the implementation of the cohesion policy programmes for 2007-2013
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................27
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 27
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................35
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ................................35
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................39
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................39
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 31. marca 2010 z naslovom Kohezijska politika: Strateško poročilo o izvajanju programov 2007–2013 za leto 2010 ( KOM(2010)0110 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Communication of 31 March 2010: ‘Cohesion policy: Strategic Report 2010 on the implementation of the programmes 2007-2013’ ( COM(2010)0110 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 31. marca 2010, ki spremlja sporočilo Komisije z dne 31. marca z naslovom Kohezijska politika: Strateško poročilo o izvajanju programov 2007–2013 za leto 2010 ( SEC(2010)0360 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Staff Working Document of 31 March 2010: ‘Accompanying document to the Commission’s Communication of 31 March 2010 –Cohesion policy: Strategic Report 2010 on the implementation of the programmes 2007-2013’ ( SEC(2010)0360 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 25. oktobra 2010 z naslovom Kohezijska politika: odzivanje na gospodarsko krizo, pregled izvajanja ukrepov kohezijske politike, sprejetih za podporo evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva ( SEC(2010)1291 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Staff Working Paper of 25 October 2010, ‘Cohesion Policy: Responding to the economic crisis, a review of the implementation of cohesion policy measures adopted in support of the European Economic Recovery Plan’ ( SEC(2010)1291 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 14. novembra 2088 z naslovom Regije 2020 – ocena prihodnjih izzivov za regije EU“ ( SEC(2008)2868 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Staff Working Document of 14 November 2008: ‘Regions 2020 - an Assessment of Future Challenges for EU Regions’ ( SEC(2008)2868 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission ‘Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM (2010)2020),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. januarja 2011 z naslovom Prispevek regionalne politike k pametni rasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 ( KOM(2011)0017 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication of 26 January 2011 ‘Regional Policy Contributing to Sustainable Growth in Europe 2020’ ( COM(2011)0017 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1828/2006 z dne 8. decembra 2006 o pravilih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu ter Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 of 8 December 2006 setting out rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund, and in particular to Article 7 thereof
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 437/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 2010 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj glede upravičenosti posegov na stanovanjskem področju v korist marginaliziranih skupnosti
– having regard to Regulation (EU) No 437/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of housing interventions in favour of marginalised communities
UL L 132, 29.5.2010, str.
OJ L 132, 29.5.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2006/702/ES z dne 6. oktobra 2006 o strateških smernicah Skupnosti o koheziji
– having regard to the Council Decision of 6 October 2006 on Community strategic guidelines on cohesion (2006/702/EC)
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o uresničevanju sinergij med sredstvi za raziskave in inovacije iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj ter Sedmim okvirnim programom za raziskave in razvoj v mestih in regijah ter državah članicah in Uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on the implementation of the synergies of research and innovation earmarked funds in Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 concerning the European Fund of Regional Development and the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development in cities and regions as well as in the Member States and the Union
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj o doseganju dejanske ozemeljske, socialne in gospodarske kohezije v EU – nujen pogoj za globalno konkurenčnost?
– having regard to its resolution of 14 December 2010 on achieving real territorial, social and economic cohesion within the EU – a sine qua non for global competitiveness?
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0473 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0473 . ,
– ob upoštevanju informativnega dokumenta Komisije št. 1: Dodeljevanje sredstev z dne 28. februarja 2007 (COCOF/2007/0012/00),
– having regard to the Commission’s Information Paper No 1: Earmarking of 28 February 2007 (COCOF/2007/0012/00),
– ob upoštevanju obvestila Komisije z naslovom Okvirna struktura za nacionalna strateška poročila 2009 z dne 18. maja 2009 (COCOF 09/0018/01),
– having regard to the Commission’s information note ‘Indicative structure for the national strategic reports 2009’ of 18 May 2009 (COCOF 09/0018/01),