natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
"Sodelovanje iz predloga naj bo naravnano k povezovanju s partnerji za doseganje naslednjih ciljev:
"The cooperation covered by the proposal should aim to engage with partners towards achieving the following goals:
- krepitev dialoga z zadevnimi tretjimi državami s sodelovanjem, medsebojno izmenjavo in obveščanjem;
- enhancing dialogue with the third countries concerned by means of cooperation, mutual exchange and information;
- delitev in spodbujanje skupnih dejavnosti, struktur in vrednot na področju politike, gospodarstva, znanosti, izobraževanja in kulture;
- sharing and promoting common political, economic, scientific, educational and cultural activities, structures and values;
- povečanje števila izmenjav s ključnimi dvostranskimi in večstranskimi partnerji pri svetovnem upravljanju."
- increasing exchanges with key bilateral and multilateral partners in global governance".
o financiranju dejavnosti, ki niso uradna razvojna pomoč, za države iz uredbe (ES) 1905/2006
on the financing of actions other than Official Development Assistance in countries falling under Regulation (EC) 1905/2006
A. ker se razdelku 4 proračuna Evropske unije „EU kot globalni partner“ glede na številne prednostne naloge Unije in vedno nove potrebe stalno namenja premalo sredstev, kar povzroča medinstitucionalne napetosti,
A. Whereas heading 4 of the EU budget, 'the EU as a global player', is, in the light of the numerous priorities of the Union and the constant flow of new needs, a chronically underfinanced heading, giving rise to interinstitutional tensions,
B. ker vmesni pregled večletnega finančnega okvira omogoča tudi pregled tekočega finančnega okvira, da bi se lahko upoštevale potrebe in popravki, ugotovljeni od leta 2007,
B. Whereas the mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial Framework also offers the chance to revise the current financial framework to take account of the needs and adjustments that have been identified since 2007,
C. ker imata zakonodajna predloga Odbora za razvoj pomanjkljivosti, ki med drugim zadevajo usklajenost in učinkovitost razvojne politike Skupnosti v celoti,
C. Whereas the two possible legislative proposals suggested by the Committee on Development both present certain difficulties in terms of coherence and efficiency for EU development policy as a whole,
4. meni, da bi lahko sredstva, ki so potrebna za financiranje tega novega instrumenta za sodelovanje, črpali na primer iz večletnega finančnega okvira, sprejetega v okviru uredbe (ES) 1905/2006;
Takes the view that the funds necessary for the financing of this new cooperation instrument could, for example, be drawn from the multiannual financial envelope adopted in the framework of Regulation (EC) 1905/2006;
Namestniki (člen 178(2)), navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2)present for the final vote
o reviziji evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta
on the review of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1638/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o splošnih določbah o ustanovitvi Evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva
- having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1638/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 laying down general provisions establishing a European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument
- ob upoštevanju razvoja evropske sosedske politike (ESP) od leta 2004 in zlasti poročil Komisije o napredku na področju njenega izvajanja,
- having regard to the development of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) since 2004, and in particular to the Commission's progress reports on its implementation;
- ob upoštevanju akcijskih načrtov, sprejetih skupaj z Armenijo, Azerbajdžanom, Egiptom, Gruzijo, Izraelom, Jordanijo, Libanonom, Marokom, palestinsko upravo, Tunizijo in Ukrajino,
- having regard to the action plans adopted jointly with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Georgia, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Moldova, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority, Tunisia and Ukraine;
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki vzpostavlja partnerstvo med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Rusko federacijo na drugi strani in je stopil v veljavo 1. decembra 1997; ob upoštevanju, da so se decembra 2008 začela pogajanja o obnovljenem sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju,
– having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Russian Federation, of the other part, which entered into force on 1 December 1997, and to the resumption of the negotiations on a renewed Partnership and Cooperation Agreement in December 2008,
- ob upoštevanju sklepov, ki sta jih septembra in oktobra 2008 sprejela Svet za splošne zadeve in Svet za zunanje odnose glede obnovitve dialoga z beloruskimi oblastmi ter začasne opustitve omejitev potovanj za vodilne osebnosti za obdobje šest mesecev, in sicer po izpustitvi političnih zapornikov ter manjših izboljšavah pri izvajanju parlamentarnih volitev,
- having regard to the decisions adopted by the General Affairs and External Relations Councils in September and October 2008 to restore dialogue with the Belarusian authorities and to suspend travel restrictions for leading figures for a period of six months, following the release of political prisoners and minor improvements in the conduct of parliamentary elections,
– ob upoštevanju barcelonske deklaracije, sprejete na evro-sredozemski konferenci ministrov za zunanje zadeve 27. in 28. novembra 1995 v Barceloni, s katero je bilo vzpostavljeno evro-sredozemsko partnerstvo,
– having regard to the Barcelona Declaration adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference of Ministers for Foreign Affairs in Barcelona on 27 and 28 November 1995, establishing a Euro-Mediterranean Partnership,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom „Barcelonski proces: Unija za Sredozemlje“ ( KOM(2008)0319 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean” ( COM(2008)0319 ),
– ob upoštevanju potrditve tega sporočila, ki jo je bruseljski Evropski svet izrekel 13. in 14. marca 2008,
– having regard to the endorsement of that communication by the Brussels European Council of 13 and 14 March 2008,
– ob upoštevanju izjave s pariškega vrha za Sredozemlje v Parizu 13. julija 2008,
– having regard to the declaration of the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean, held in Paris on 13 July 2008,
– ob upoštevanju izjave o upravljanju, projektih in regionalnem političnem dialogu, sprejete na ministrski konferenci o Barcelonskem procesu: Uniji za Sredozemlje v Marseillu 3. in 4. novembra 2008;
– having regard to the declaration on governance, projects and regional political dialogue adopted at the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean” ministerial conference held in Marseilles on 3 and 4 November 2008,
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 11. aprila 2007 z naslovom „Sinergija Črnega morja – nova pobuda za regionalno sodelovanje“ ( KOM(2007)0160 ) in sporočila Komisije z dne 19. junija 2008 ( KOM(2008)0391 ), ki poroča o prvem letu izvajanja te pobude,
- having regard to the Commission's communication to the Council and the European Parliament of 11 April 2007 entitled “Black Sea Synergy – A New Regional Cooperation Initiative” (
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom „Vzhodno partnerstvo“ ( KOM(2008)0823 ),
COM(2007)0160 ) and to the Commission's communication of 19 June 2008 ( COM(2008)0391 ) reporting on the first year of implementation of that initiative,
– ob upoštevanju pisma, ki ga je Odboru za zunanje zadeve Parlamenta 26. aprila 2006 poslala komisarka Benita Ferrero-Waldner,
– having regard to the Commission's communication to the European Parliament and the Council entitled “Eastern Partnership” ( COM(2008)0823 ),– having regard to the letter of 26 April 2006 from Commissioner Ferrero Waldner to Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs,
- ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o evropski sosedski politiki in strategiji širitve Evropske unije,
- having regard to its resolutions on the ENP and the EU's enlargement strategy,
- ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o sosednjih državah in regijah Evropske unije,
- having regard to its earlier resolutions on the neighbouring countries and regions of the EU,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenj Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za proračun in Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0037/2009 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0037/2009 ),
A. ker sta reforma iz leta 2006 in sporazum o novem okviru zunanje pomoči vključevala zavezo Komisije, da bo izvedla vmesni pregled izvajanja uredbe (ES) št. 1638/2006 pred evropskimi volitvami leta 2009, Parlamentu pa sta dodelila povečane nadzorne pristojnosti na področju pomoči Skupnosti,
A. whereas the 2006 reform and the agreement on the new external assistance framework contained a commitment by the Commission to carry out a mid-term review of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1638/2006 before the 2009 European elections and granted Parliament increased powers of scrutiny in respect of Community assistance,
B. ker je Odbor za zunanje zadeve v letu 2006 ustanovil delovne skupine glede evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta za jug ter evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta za vzhod, da bi vzpostavil strukturiran dialog s Komisijo o izvedbenih dokumentih, ki so določili politični okvir za zagotavljanje pomoči v skladu z evropskim sosedskim in partnerskim instrumentom,
B. whereas in 2006 the Committee on Foreign Affairs set up working groups in relation to the ENPI South and ENPI East, in order to hold a structured dialogue with the Commission on the implementation documents, which set out the policy framework for the delivery of assistance under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI),
C. ker je bil namen evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta od začetka sedanje finančne perspektive v letu 2007 podpirati izvajanje evropske sosedske politike in zlasti njenih akcijskih načrtov ter strateškega partnerstva z Rusko federacijo prek podpore za izvajanje časovnih načrtov glede štirih skupnih prostorov,
C. whereas since the beginning of the current financial perspective in 2007 the aim of the ENPI has been to support the implementation of the ENP and in particular the ENP action plans, as well as of the strategic partnership with the Russian Federation through its support for the implementation of the road maps for the four Common Spaces,
D. ker je glavni cilj evropske sosedske politike vzpostaviti dobrososedsko okolje v neposredni bližini Evropske unije; ker so sosednje države naravno razdeljene v dve kategoriji: južne in vzhodne, z različnimi cilji in pristopi do Evropske unije ker je ta delitev ponazorjena z dvema nedavno predlaganima pobudama: Unijo za Sredozemlje in vzhodnim partnerstvom,
D. whereas the main objective of the ENP is to establish a friendly environment in the closest environs of the European Union; whereas neighbouring countries are divided naturally into two categories: Southern and Eastern, with different goals and approaches to the European Union; whereas this division is exemplified by the two recently proposed initiatives, namely the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) and the Eastern Partnership,
E. ker je bil evropski sosedski in partnerski instrument oblikovan tudi za financiranje čezmejnih in večdržavnih programov na tem področju, z namenom podpirati med drugim pobude, kot je sinergija Črnega morja, Unija za Sredozemlje in vzhodno partnerstvo,
E. whereas the ENPI has also been designed to finance cross-border and multi-country programmes in the ENPI area, with the aim of supporting in t er alia initiatives such as the Black Sea Synergy, the UfM and the Eastern Partnership,
F. ker evropska sosedska politika ostaja ena osrednjih prednostnih nalog zunanje politike Evropske unije in ker vsem zadevnim državam ponuja možnost tesnejšega povezovanja z EU,
F. whereas the ENP remains one of the principal priorities of the European Union's foreign policy and offers all the States concerned the possibility of closer integration with the EU,
G. ker evropska sosedska politika ni odvisna od pristopnega procesa, vendar ga ne izključuje, ter ker predstavlja korak naprej pri gospodarskem in političnem zbliževanju med Evropsko unijo in sosednjimi državami,
G. whereas the ENP is independent from, but not exclusive of, the accession process and constitutes a step towards economic and political rapprochement between the EU and neighbouring countries,
H. ker je posledica hitre demografske rasti držav, ki mejijo na EU, vse večji delež mestnega prebivalstva, kar predstavlja nov izziv za evropski sosedski in partnerski instrument,
H. whereas the rapid demographic growth of the countries neighbouring the EU, resulting in their populations becoming increasingly urbanised, represents a new challenge for the ENPI,
3 poziva Svet, naj skupaj s Parlamentom razvije prožen in pregleden instrument za zagotavljanje informacij s tega področja in naj Parlamentu čim hitreje posreduje zapisnike o sprejetih sklepih;
Calls on the Council to develop, in conjunction with Parliament, a flexible and transparent instrument for the provision of information in this field and to forward promptly to Parliament minutes of the decisions adopted;
6. meni, da je treba prepoznavnost pomoči Skupnosti povečati s ciljno usmerjeno komunikacijo z interesnimi skupinami in širšo javnostjo, in v ta namen priporoča vzpostavitev stikov s civilno družbo in lokalnimi organi, saj so ti bliže državljanom in torej predstavljajo primerno in učinkovito raven delovanja;
Takes the view that the visibility of the Community assistance should be increased through targeted communication with stakeholders and the general public, and recommends that contacts be developed to that end with civil society and local authorities, as they are closer to the citizens and therefore represent a competent and effective level at which to act;
13. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi natančen pregled vseh skupnih operativnih programov, odobrenih za obdobje 2007-2013, in oceni stopnjo spoštovanja načel preglednosti, učinkovitosti in partnerstva pri izvajanju projektov; spodbuja Komisijo, naj pripravi popis najpogostejših težav, s katerimi se soočajo organi upravljanja v obmejnih regijah EU in v državah evropske sosedske politike, da bi za naslednje programsko obdobje pripravili bolj primerne rešitve zanje;
Calls on the Commission to prepare a detailed overview of all joint operational programmes approved for the period 2007-2013, together with an assessment of the degree to which the principles of transparency, efficiency and partnership have been respected in the implementation of projects; encourages the Commission to prepare an inventory of the most frequent problems faced by the managing authorities both in EU border regions and in the ENP countries, in order to identify more appropriate solutions for them for the next programming period;
16. poudarja potrebo po okrepljenem sodelovanju na strani držav evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta z agencijami Evropske unije ter povečanih možnostih za te države, da sodelujejo v programih Skupnosti, če so izpolnjeni cilji akcijskih načrtov evropske sosedske politike; poziva Komisijo, naj učinkovito ukrepa za zmanjšanje finančnega bremena tretjih držav, ki si prizadevajo sodelovati v teh programih Skupnosti;
Stresses the need for enhanced cooperation on the part of the ENPI countries with the EU agencies and increased opportunities for the ENPI countries to participate in the Community programmes, provided that the objectives of the ENP action plans have been fulfilled; calls on the Commission to take effective measures to minimise the financial burden that falls upon third countries seeking to participate in these Community programmes;
22. pozdravlja dejstvo, da predlog Komisije za vzhodno partnerstvo vključuje vzpostavitev tematskih platform (demokracija, dobro upravljanje in stabilnost, gospodarsko povezovanje in zbliževanje s politikami EU, zanesljiva oskrba z energijo, stiki med ljudmi), ki se ujemajo z glavnimi področji sodelovanja;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission's proposal for the Eastern Partnership includes the establishment of thematic platforms (democracy, good governance and stability, economic integration and convergence with EU policies, energy security, contacts between people) corresponding to the main areas of cooperation;
26. poziva Komisijo, naj strogo oceni resnične potrebe držav, katerim trenutno zagotavlja čezmorsko razvojno pomoč in drugo podobno pomoč, predvsem glede na ravni BDP in stopnje gospodarske rasti v državah prejemnicah;
Calls on the Commission to strictly assess the real needs of the countries to which it currently provides Overseas Development Aid and similar assistance, with particular reference to levels of GDP and rates of economic growth in recipient states;
28. opozarja, da je Parlament med pogajanji o pravni podlagi za evropski sosedski in partnerski instrument izrazil upravičene pomisleke o tem, kako vključiti srednjeročne in kratkoročne strateške in nacionalne dokumente, ki pogosto vsebujejo okvirne finančne zneske, v parlamentarni nadzor; poziva k oceni izvajanja teh okvirnih finančnih obveznosti v preteklih dveh letih;
Recalls that, during the negotiations on the ENPI's legal basis, Parliament had legitimate concerns over how the medium and short-term strategy papers and country papers, often containing indicative financial amounts, would be subject to parliamentary scrutiny; calls for an evaluation of how these indicative financial commitments have been implemented during the past two years;
Sklep Sveta 2006/1016/ES o odobritvi jamstva Skupnosti Evropski investicijski banki za izgube pri posojilih in jamstvih za projekte zunaj Skupnosti (UL L 414, 30.12.2006, str.
Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community (OJ L 414, 30.12.2006, p.
95). , in da mora tovrstno financiranje potekati v skladu z zunanjo politiko EU in jo podpirati, vključno z njenimi posebnimi regionalnimi cilji; opozarja, da je sedanja najvišja zgornja meja financiranja EIB za države evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta za obdobje 2007–2013 12,4 milijarde EUR, ta znesek pa je razdeljen na dva okvirna podzneska, in sicer 8,7 milijarde EUR za sredozemske države ter 3,7 milijarde EUR za vzhodne države in Rusijo; poziva k oceni, izvedeni skupaj z EIB, da bi ugotovili, kako se taka posojila izvajajo;
95). , and that financing operations should be consistent with and support EU external policies including specific regional objectives; recalls that the current maximum ceiling of the EIB financing operations for ENPI countries over the period 2007-2013 is EUR 12,4 billion, broken down into two indicative sub-ceilings of EUR 8,7 billion for Mediterranean countries and EUR 3,7 billion for Eastern countries and Russia; calls for an evaluation in conjunction with the EIB to determine how such loans are being implemented;
32. ponovno izraža zaskrbljenost, da bi v primeru usmerjanja pomoči EU prek večdonatorskih odškodninskih skladov lahko prihajalo do pomanjkljivosti glede odgovornosti in tveganja zlorabe sredstev Skupnosti; poudarja pomen dobrega sistema javnih financ, temelječega na načelih preglednosti in demokratične odgovornosti; zato poziva Komisijo, naj se vedno, ko je to mogoče in kjer ima na voljo boljše ter preglednejše načine, izogne usmerjanju sredstev prek omenjenih posrednikov;
Reiterates its concern about the potential deficiencies of accountability and the risk of misappropriations of Community funds when EU assistance is channelled through multi-donors' trust funds; stresses the importance of a sound public financial system based on transparency and democratic accountability; calls on the Commission, therefore, to avoid channelling funds through these intermediaries where possible, and where better and more transparent means for channelling such funds exist;
Opombe za posamezne države in regije
Country and region-specific remarks
– financiranje pobude evropske sosedske politike za jug ali vzhod iz evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta ne sme iti v škodo druge,
– the ENPI financing of the ENP initiative for the South or East should not be used to the detriment of each other,
- mora biti Parlament ustrezno obveščen o projektih Unije za Sredozemlje, ki se financirajo iz evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta;
- Parliament should be adequately informed of the UfM projects funded from the ENPI;
- je zlasti pomembna preglednost drugih virov, vključno z zasebnim financiranjem, ko se uporabljajo sredstva evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta;
- when ENPI funds are used, the transparency of other sources, including private funding, is particularly important;
38. poudarja, da zamrznjeni konflikti predstavljajo oviro za popolni razvoj evropske sosedske politike v zvezi z Južnim Kavkazom, in poziva Svet, naj aktivneje sodeluje pri razreševanju konfliktov;
Points out that the frozen conflicts represent an obstacle to the full development of the ENP with regard to the South Caucasus, and calls on the Council to engage more actively in the conflict resolution;
40. pozdravlja dejstvo, da evropsko partnerstvo ponuja boljšo spodbudo ambicioznim partnerskim državam, kot je na primer Ukrajina; pozdravlja zlasti novi, celoviti program za institucionalni razvoj za izboljšanje upravne usposobljenosti v ustreznih sektorjih sodelovanja;
Welcomes the fact that the Eastern Partnership offers a more significant incentive to ambitious partner countries such as Ukraine; welcomes in particular the new Comprehensive Institution-Building programme for improving administrative capacity in the relevant sectors of cooperation;
45. poudarja, da je treba finančni okvir za potrebe Belorusije ponovno preučiti, da se ugotovi, če je mogoče sodelovanje razširiti tako, da bo poleg energije, okolja in preseljevanja zajemalo še druga področja, z namenom izvajanja politike ponovne vključitve, ki jo je začel Svet septembra 2008; opozarja, da bodo odnosi med EU in Belorusijo v veliki meri odvisni od zavezanosti beloruske vlade demokratičnim vrednotam; poudarja potrebo po dejanski politični pogojenosti ter po zagotavljanju, da bo pomoč imela takojšen pozitivni učinek na državljane in je organi ne bodo zlorabili proti svojim političnim nasprotnikom; poudarja, da bi morala EU učinkoviteje podpreti civilno družbo in politične stranke, ki zagovarjajo demokracijo;
Stresses that the financial envelope for Belarus needs to be reviewed to see whether cooperation can be broadened to cover areas beyond energy, the environment and migration, with a view to pursuing the policy of re-engagement initiated by the Council in September 2008; recalls that relations between the EU and Belarus will depend very much on the commitment of the government of Belarus to democratic values; underlines the need for effective political conditionality and for guarantees that the assistance will have an immediate positive impact on citizens and will not be misused by the authorities against their political opponents; stresses that the EU should give more effective support to civil society and to political parties who are defending democracy;
- večje rusko sodelovanje pri določanju jasnih prednostnih nalog finančnega sodelovanja, kar bi vodilo v boljše načrtovanje in večletno programiranje pomoči;
- greater Russian cooperation in identifying clear financial cooperation priorities, which would lead to better planning and multi-annual programming of aid;