natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finančni instrumenti za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti stavb
Financial instruments for improving the energy performance of buildings
Brez poseganja v nacionalno zakonodajo države članice izvajajo vsaj dva finančna instrumenta s tega seznama:
Without prejudice to national legislation, Member States shall implement at least two financial instruments from the following list:
(a) znižanje DDV za prihranek energije, visoko energetsko učinkovitost ter za blago in storitve, ki uporabljajo energijo iz obnovljivih virov;
(a) VAT reductions for energy saving, high energy performance and renewable energy goods and services;
(b) druge davčne olajšave za blago in storitve, s katerimi se prihrani energija, ali energetsko učinkovite stavbe, vključno z davkom na prihodek ali davkom na lastnino;
(b) other tax reductions for energy saving goods and services or energy efficient buildings, including fiscal rebates on income or property taxes;
(c) neposredne subvencije;
(c) direct subsidies;
(d) sistem subvencioniranih posojil ali posojil z nizko obrestno mero;
(d) subsidised loan schemes or low interest loans;
(e) nepovratna sredstva;
(e) grant schemes;
(f) sistemi za posojilna jamstva;
(f) loan guarantee schemes;
(g) zahteve ali sporazumi z dobavitelji energije, da ponudijo finančno pomoč vsem kategorijam potrošnikov;
(g) requirements on or agreements with energy suppliers to offer financial assistance to all categories of consumers;
Pomen energetske učinkovitosti
The Importance of Energy Efficiency
Evropa se sooča z vrsto pomembnih kratko-, srednje- in dolgoročnih izzivov glede dobave energije in povpraševanja po njej.
Europe faces a series of major short, medium and long term challenges relating to energy supply and demand.
Evropa potrebuje trajnostno, nizkoogljično prihodnost.
Europe needs a sustainable, low carbon future.
Evropska unija si je zastavila zelo ambiciozne cilje za leto 2020: zmanjšanje toplogrednih plinov za 20 % (30 %, če se doseže mednarodni sporazum), prihranek 20 % pri porabi energije prek izboljšanja energetske učinkovitosti in zadovoljitev 20 % potreb po energiji iz obnovljivih virov.
The EU has set itself very ambitious targets for 2020: cutting greenhouse gases by 20% (30% if international agreement is reached), saving 20% of energy consumption through increased energy efficiency and meeting 20% of our energy needs from renewable sources.
Evropska unija se sooča tudi z velikim gospodarskim nazadovanjem .
The EU also faces a considerable economic downturn .
V tretjem četrtletju 2008 se je BDP v EU 27 zmanjšal za 0,2 % v primerjavi s predhodnim četrtletjem.
GDP declined by 0.2% in the EU27 during the third quarter of 2008, compared with the previous quarter.
V evro območju (15 držav) je stopnja brezposelnosti novembra 2008 – prilagojeno na obdobje – znašala do 7,8 %.
In the euro area (EA15) seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate was up to 7.8% in November 2008.
Cena in zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo bosta poglavitna dejavnika za konkurenčnost Evropske unije in za dobro počutje njenih državljanov .
The price and reliability of energy supply will be a critical factor in both EU competitiveness and the wellbeing of its citizens .
Cene energije za gospodinjstva na ravni Evropske unije so se v zadnjih dveh letih občutno povišale: 15 % za elektriko, 21 % za plinsko olje in 28 % za zemeljski plin.
At EU level, over the last two years, energy prices for households have increased substantially: by 15% for electricity, 21% for gasoil and 28% for natural gas.
To bo občutno vplivalo na najbolj ranljive člane družbe.
This will have had significant impacts on the most vulnerable members of society.
Spodbujanje „zelenih služb“ bi lahko bilo ključno za načrt EU za okrevanje .
Promoting 'green jobs' has the potential to be a critical part of the EU recovery plan .
Naložbe v energetsko učinkovitost, ki so običajno delovno intenzivne, imajo pomembno vlogo pri ustvarjanju delovnih mest.
Investments in energy efficiency, which are often labour intensive, have a particularly important role to play in job creation.
Raziskava, ki jo je naročila Komisija, dokazuje, da naložbe v energetsko učinkovitost ustvarijo toliko ali več delovnih mest kot naložbe v tradicionalne infrastrukture (cesto, mostove ali prenos energije).
Research commissioned by the Commission indicates that investments in energy efficiency generate as much or more employment as investments in traditional infrastructures (road, bridges, or energy transmission).
Naftna kriza ob koncu leta 2008 in začetku 2009 je razkrila izzive zanesljivosti oskrbe za Evropsko unijo ter njeno odvisnost od zunanje oskrbe s plinom .
The gas crisis at the end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 underlined the challenges to the EU's security of supply, and its dependency on external gas supply .
EU 27 je za 51 % potreb po energiji odvisna od uvoza.
The EU-27 depends on imports for 51% of its energy needs.
Izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti je stroškovno najučinkovitejši način, da Evropska unija doseže svoje cilje glede emisij CO2, ustvari delovna mesta, zmanjša stroške poslovanja, se spopade s socialnimi vplivi povišanja cen energije in zmanjša svojo naraščajočo odvisnost od zunanjih oskrbovalcev z energijo.
Increasing energy efficiency is the most cost effective way for the EU to: deliver its CO2 emissions goals, create jobs, reduce costs for business, address the social impacts of energy price rises and reduce the EU's growing dependency on external energy suppliers.
Izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti stavb, ki je približno 40 % celotne porabe energije, je izjemno pomemben korak.
Improving the energy performance of buildings, which represents around 40% of energy consumption, is a particularly critical step.
Glede na zgoraj opisano je zdaj pravi trenutek, da Evropska unija pregleda in izboljša direktivo o energetski učinkovitosti stavb.
Given the context described above, it is now the right moment for the EU to revisit and improve the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive.
Ovire pri napredku
Barriers to Progress
Komisija zatrjuje, da sta namena pri predlogu te prenovitve dva:
The Commission's stated intention in proposing this recast is two-fold:
· uporabiti izkušnje, pridobljene od začetka veljave prvotne direktive leta 2002,
· To apply the experience obtained since the original Directive came into force in 2002;
· zagotoviti bolj poenoteno in strogo izvajanje določb te zakonodaje.
· To ensure a more uniform and rigorous application of the provisions of this legislation.
Načelo prenovitve je bilo splošno dobro sprejeto v gradbenem in energetskem sektorju, a to ne pomeni, da ne potrebuje natančne obravnave in sprememb.
The principle of the recast has been broadly welcomed within the construction and energy sectors.
Zaradi slabega izvajanja trenutno veljavne direktive je izziv prenovitve še toliko večji.
But this does not mean however that it does not require close examination and amendment.
Dvaindvajset držav članic zagotavlja, da so jo v celoti prenesle v svoje zakonodaje, a je Komisija izrazila svoje razočaranje nad izvajanjem ukrepov v zvezi z energetsko učinkovitostjo v državah članicah.
In particular, the recast faces a challenge give the disappointing level of implementation of the current Directive.
Čeprav ne obstajajo otipljivi podatki se zdi, da je število novih in obnovljenih stavb, pri katerih so bila vključena občutna izboljšanja energetske učinkovitosti, v številnih državah članicah zelo nizko.
22 Member States claim full transposition, but the Commission has expressed disappointment with the level of implementation of energy efficiency measures in many Member States; and (although there is no concrete data) the perception is that number of new buildings and renovations incorporating significant energy efficiency improvements are low in many Member States.
Nekatere ovire pri napredku so:
Some of the barriers to progress are:
Pomanjkljivo zavedanje, da bi izboljšanja prinesla finančni prihranek.
Lack of awareness about the possibility of financial savings.
To oviro je treba odstraniti z informacijskimi kampanjami.
This barrier must be removed by information campaigns.
Negotovost in nezaupanje v znesek prihrankov v prihodnje.
Uncertainty and mistrust about the quantity of the savings that will be achieved.
Certifikacija in nadzor kakovosti lahko pripomoreta k izboljšanju zaupanja v rezultate ukrepov za varčevanje z energijo.
Certification and quality management can help to increase the confidence in the results of energy saving measures.
Slab dostop do finančnih sredstev za velike naložbe v ukrepe za varčevanje z energijo.
Lack of access to finance for large investments in energy saving measures.
Vlade bi morale pripraviti programe za finančno podporo in pomagati bankam pri zagotavljanju sredstev.
Governments should set up financial support programs and help to ensure banks can offer finance.
Prizadevanja – zlasti pri obnovi in prenovi.
The 'effort' involved - particularly for refurbishment and renovation.
Informacijske kampanje in podporni programi se morajo osredotočiti na naravne možnosti za naložbe, na primer pri spremembi razmer pri naseljenosti objektov v kombinaciji z lokalnimi programi za nadgradnjo.
Information campaigns and support programs should focus on natural investment opportunities, e.g. when occupation changes, combined with district upgrading programs.
Potrebne izboljšave direktive
Improvements needed to the Directive
Direktiva mora odražati potrebo po ustreznem financiranju, ki mora spremljati minimalne standarde in zahteve, ki jih je treba določiti.
The Directive should reflect the need for adequate financing to accompany the minimum standards and requirements that will be established.
Cilj direktive bo dosežen le, če se pripravi kombinacija finančnih instrumentov, ki bo na voljo in natančno prilagojena najbolj ranljivim gospodinjstvom.
The aim of the Directive will be achieved only if a mix of financial instruments is made available - ideally targeting the most vulnerable households.
Države članice in/ali Komisija lahko in naj uporabijo veliko instrumentov:
There are many potential instruments that Member States and/or the Commission can and should deploy:
· neposredne projekte za javne odhodke,
· Direct public expenditure projects.
· jamstva za posojila in subvencije (uporabno, če ni mogoče dobiti kredita),
· Loan guarantees and subsidies (useful when it is difficult to obtain credit).
· socialna jamstva ,
· Social grants.
· znižanje DDV za storitve in proizvode, povezane z izboljšavami energetske učinkovitosti stavb,
· VAT reductions for services and products related to the improvement of energy efficiency of buildings
· znižanje davkov na lastnino,
· Property tax reductions.
· inovativni modeli financiranja – na primer poplačilo prihrankov pri računih za energijo,
· Innovative financing models - e.g. financing through repayments based on savings made on energy bills.
· vzpostavitev sklada za evropsko energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljivo energijo, ki bi podpiral izvajanje te direktive.
· The creation of the European Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund to support the implementation of this Directive
Do zdaj je bila uporaba strukturnih skladov za energetsko učinkovitost stavb dovoljena samo tistim državam članicam, ki so vstopile v Evropsko unijo po 1. maju 2004.
Until now, the limited use of the structural funds for the energy efficiency of buildings has been allowed only for those Member States that acceded to the European Union on or after 1 May 2004.
Komisija je predlagala, da se ta možnost razširi na vse države članice.
The Commission has proposed to extend this opportunity to all Member States.
Poročevalka predlaga povišanja s 3 na 15 % najvišjega zneska sredstev za tovrstne projekte iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj.
The Rapporteur proposes an increase from 3% to 15% in the maximum amount of ERDF funding which can be allocated to such projects.
Obveščanje in ozaveščanje
Information and Awareness
Bistveno je, da so vsi ustrezni akterji seznanjeni z pozitivnimi posledicami izboljšanja energetske učinkovitosti in da imajo dostop do ustreznih informacij o njej.
It is vital that all relevant actors are made aware of the benefits of improving energy performance, and have access to relevant information on how to go about it.
Države članice bi morale izmenjevati informacije o najboljši praksi.
Member States should be able to exchange information related to best practice.
Razviti je treba skupni evropski vir, spletno stran ali bazo podatkov, kjer bi lahko našli vso zakonodajo, javne programe za spodbujanje nizkih emisij CO2 in energetsko učinkovitih stavb ter vse ustrezne finančne in fiskalne instrumente.
A common European resource - a website and a database - should be developed containing all applicable legislation, all public programs promoting low CO2 emission and energy-efficient buildings and the applicable financial and fiscal instruments.
Kampanje za informiranje in ozaveščanje se morajo osredotočiti na vprašanja, ki jih minimalni standardi ne pokrivajo.
Information and awareness campaigns should focus on aspects not covered by the minimum standards.
Lokalni in regionalni organi
Local and regional authorities
Države članice imajo pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju izboljšav energetske učinkovitosti stavb.
Member States have an important role in the implementing improvements to energy performance of building
Pri razvoju standardizirane metodologije za izračun minimalnih vrednosti se je treba posvetovati z lokalnimi in regionalnimi organi.
Local and regional authorities should be consulted in the development of the Standardised Methodology for calculating minimum standards methodology.
Države članice tudi zagotovijo, da so načrtovalcem in arhitektom na voljo smernice in usposabljanja, tako da bodo lahko ustrezno upoštevali najboljšo kombinacijo obnovljivih virov energije, tehnologije z visokim izkoristkom ter daljinskega ogrevanja in hlajenja pri načrtovanju, projektiranju, gradnji in prenovi industrijskih ali stanovanjskih območij.
In addition, Member States must ensure that guidance and training is made available to planners and building inspectors so that they are able properly to consider the optimal combination of renewable energy sources, of high-efficiency technologies and of district heating and cooling when planning, designing, building and renovating industrial or residential areas.
Energetske izkaznice
Energy Performance Certificates
Energetska učinkovitost, kot je opredeljena v direktivi, morda ne bo odražala dejanske porabe energije.
'Energy performance' as defined by the Directive may not reflect actual energy use.
Informacije, predstavljene na energetski izkaznici pri stavbah, ki jih uporabljajo javni organi in za stavbe, kjer se pogosto zadržuje javnost, morajo biti dostopne in lahko primerljive.
Information contained in the display of Energy Performance Certificates in building occupied by public authorities and for other buildings frequented by the public must be accessible and easily comparable.
Komisija mora razviti skupni standard za prikaz, tudi skupne energetske oznake za te stavbe.
Common standards for display, including a common energy label for such buildings, should be developed by the Commission.
Ker morajo stavbe, ki jih uporabljajo javni organi, nuditi zgled za spodbujanje energetske učinkovitosti, je razumno zahtevati, da se pri v njih razumnem času uporabijo priporočila iz energetskih izkaznic.
As buildings occupied by public authorities must play an exemplary role in demonstrating and promoting energy efficiency, it reasonable to require them to implement recommendations contained within the EPC in a reasonable timeframe.
Vsi lastniki stavb pa bi morali imeti pravico, kadarkoli in z različnimi strokovnjaki začeti ali revidirati energetske izkaznice, če se ne strinjajo s ponujenimi priporočili.
All building owners, however, should have the right to initiate or revise an EPC at any time, using different experts if they disagree with the recommendations provided.
Bistveno je tudi, da se v vseh državah članicah vzpostavi večja standardizacija in vzajemno priznavanje pri energetskih izkaznicah ter pri usposabljanjih in akreditiranju strokovnjakov, ki jih pripravljajo.
Finally, it is vital that there is greater standardisation and mutual recognition both for EPCs and the training and accreditation of the experts that provide them, across Member States.
Komisija bi morala razviti skupne smernice, da bi se to lahko uresničilo.
The Commission should develop common guidelines for both, which should enable this.
Minimalni standardi
Minimum Standards
Poročevalka se strinja s pristopom Komisije, ki zagotavlja približevanje držav članic na osnovi njihovih minimalnih standardov, in s predlaganim časovnim razporedom.
Your Rapporteur supports the Commission's approach of ensuring convergence between Member States on the basis for their Minimum standards, and the broad timetables proposed.
Ta pristop bo omogočil prilagodljivost geografskim in klimatskim razlikam, hkrati pa bo zagotovil strogost in utemeljenost standardov.
The approach will allow for flexibility reflecting geographical and climatic differences, whilst also ensuring standards are rigorous and well founded.
Kljub temu so potrebne nekatere manjše izboljšave.
However, some small improvements are needed.
Ker se tehnološka in gradbena znanja nenehno izboljšujejo in glede na izkušnje držav članic pri izvajanju, je logično, da bi Komisija morala redno pregledovati in posodabljati standardizirano metodologijo za izračun stroškovno optimalne energetske učinkovitosti.
Given continual improvements in technological and construction know-how, and in the light of the experience of Member States in application, it is logical that the Commission should regularly review and update the standardised methodology for calculating cost optimal energy efficiency.
Države članice po letu 2014 ne bi smele dodeljevati podpore za gradnjo novih stavb, ki po standardizirani metodologiji ne bodo v skladu s stroškovno optimalno ravnjo energetske učinkovitosti.
Member States should not be incentivising new buildings that do not meet the cost optimal levels of energy performance implied by the standardised methodology after 2014.
Vendar poročevalka izraža zaskrbljenost, da bi lahko bil časovni okvir za izvajanje obnov problematičen, saj je načrtovanje velikih obnovitvenih del dolgotrajno, kar bi lahko pomenilo, da bo leta 2014 veliko obsežnih projektov v več državah članicah v zamudi ali prekinjenih.
However, your Rapporteur is concerned that applying this timescale to refurbishments is problematic - planning and executing large-scale refurbishment projects is lengthy, so a date of 2014 may mean that important large-scale projects in many countries are delayed and disrupted.
Poročevalka glede izjem meni, da ni razloga, da bi sekundarna prebivališča bila izvzeta iz minimalnih standardov.
On Exemptions, your Rapporteur sees no reason why secondary residences should be exempted from minimum standards.
Poročevalka se strinja s predlogom Komisije, da se minimalni standardi, ki se uporabljajo za velika obnovitvena dela, razširijo.
The Rappoerteur agrees with the Commission's proposal to extend minimum standards are applied to all large refurbishments.
Vendar je treba upoštevati izjemo, ki temelji na tehnični in ekonomski izvedljivosti.
But an exemption based on technical and economic feasibility applies.
Veliko držav članic in lokalnih izvršilnih organov bo verjetno različno opredelilo izvedljivost, zato so na tem področju potrebne jasne smernice.
It is probable that different Member States and even different local enforcement agencies will define feasibility in different ways, so clear guidance is needed in this area.
Stavbe z nizkimi ali ničnimi emisijami ogljika
Low and zero carbon buildings.
Predlog Komisije bi bilo mogoče okrepiti.
The Commission's proposals here can be strengthened.
Ni razloga, da vse nove stavbe ne bi dosegle tega standarda do leta 2020.
There is no reason why all new buildings should not meet this standard by 2020.
Javne stavbe bi ga morale doseči prej.
Public buildings should meet it earlier.
Komisija bi morala do leta 2013 pripraviti predlog za skupno opredelitev stavb z nizkimi ali ničnimi emisijami ogljika ter za primerjalno metodologijo, ki jo bodo morale uporabiti države članice pri dodelavi svojih nacionalnih načrtov in opredelitev.
The Commission should come forward, by 2013 with a proposal for a common definition of low or zero carbon buildings and a comparative methodology to be used by Member States in refining their national plans and definitions.
Da bi se zagotovilo, da bo ta stroga, učinkovita in ustrezno upoštevana, jo je treba določiti po postopku soodločanja, in ne komitologije.
To ensure that these are rigorous, effective and properly considered, they should be a matter for Co-decision, not Comitology.
Pregled ogrevalnih in klimatskih sistemov
Inspection of heating and air conditioning systems .
Pregledi ogrevalnih in klimatskih sistemov so lahko za lastnike stavb velika birokratska obremenitev, zato je ključno, da so pregledi usklajeni, v najboljšem primeru tako, da oba pregleda potekata hkrati.
As inspections of heating and air conditioning systems may be a considerable bureaucratic burden on building owners, it is vital that inspections are aligned, ideally so that both inspections happen at the same time.
Komisija zagotovi odstopanje od rednih pregledov ogrevalnih sistemov, če države članice sprejmejo druge „enakovredne“ ukrepe.
The Commission provides a derogation from regular inspections of heating systems if Member States take other measures which are ‘equivalent’.
Isto pravilo mora veljati za klimatske sisteme.
The same rule should apply to air conditioning systems.
Videti pa je, da Komisija nima možnosti odpraviti odstopanja, če meni, da ti ukrepi dejansko niso enakovredni.
But the Commission appear to have no means to block the derogation if, in its opinion, the measures are not, in fact, equivalent.
To je treba popraviti.
This must be rectified.
Zadeva: Predlog za prenovitev: Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o energetski učinkovitosti stavb
Subject : Proposal for a recast: D irective of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings
Spoštovana gospa!
Dear Madam,
Na podlagi mnenja pravne službe, katere predstavniki so se udeležili sestankov posvetovalne delovne skupine za proučitev prenovljenega predloga, in v skladu s priporočili pripravljavca mnenja Odbor za pravne zadeve meni, da zadevni predlog ne vključuje vsebinskih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v zadevnem predlogu ali v mnenju pravne službe opredeljene kot take, in da je predlog, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih aktov z omenjenimi spremembami, zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb.
Following the opinion of the Legal Service, whose representatives participated in the meetings of the Consultative Working Party examining the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the draftsperson, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that the proposal in question does not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal or in the opinion of the Consultative Working Party and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those changes, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Potem ko je Odbor za pravne zadeve na seji 9. marca 2009 proučil zadevo in o njej glasoval s 16 glasovi za
In conclusion, after discussing it at its meeting of 9 March 2009, the Committee on Legal Affairs by 16 votes in favour