natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Naši visoki standardi dobrega počutja živali so del „tržne znamke“ evropskih kmetijskih proizvajalcev, vendar le pod pogojem, da se veljavna zakonodaja resnično spoštuje.
Our high animal welfare standards are part of the ‘brand’ of European agricultural producers, but only on condition that the rules in force are genuinely complied with.
Akcijski načrt za obdobje 2006-2010
Action plan for 2006-2010
Velika večina ukrepov v sedanjem, sicer ne najbolj ambicioznem akcijskem načrtu, je bila izvedenih zadovoljivo.
The vast majority of the measures contained in the current – albeit still none too ambitious – action plan have been implemented satisfactorily.
Veliko truda je bilo vloženega pri iskanju nadomestnih metod za poskuse na živalih, da bi v okviru STO in dvostranskih sporazumov s tretjimi državami postavili dobro počutje živali v ospredje.
Good work has been done to develop alternatives to animal testing in order, under the auspices of the WTO and in bilateral agreements with third countries, to assign the highest priority to animal welfare.
Zlasti razveseljuje velik napredek, dosežen v okviru projekta „The Animal Welfare Quality Project“ glede novih znanstvenih spoznanj in poznavanja v zvezi s kazalniki zdravstvenega varstva živali.
Particularly gratifying, too, is the progress which has been made under the Animal Welfare Quality Project as regards new science and knowledge relating to animal health indicators.
Hkrati je treba grajati, da ni bilo storjenega več v zvezi s prevozom živali in s tem povezanim vprašanjem razvoja satelitskega sistema za sledenje prevozu živali.
At the same time, it is regrettable that more has not been done with regard to animal transport and the associated issue of developing a satellite system to monitor such transport.
Zlasti zaskrbljujoče je tudi, da mnogi evropski prašičerejci kršijo določbe Direktive 2008/120/ES o najnižjih standardih za zaščito prašičev.
Another matter of particular concern is that many pig farmers in Europe are violating the provisions of Directive 2008/120/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs.
Akcijski načrt za obdobje 2011-2015
Action plan for 2011-2015
Evropski parlament je že v svoji resoluciji iz leta 2006 zahteval, naj sedanjemu akcijskemu načrtu sledi nov akcijski načrt.
In its resolution of 2006 the European Parliament already called for the existing action plan to be followed by a new one.
To zahtevo je treba ponoviti, zlasti ob upoštevanju člena 13 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, kot jo spreminja Lizbonska pogodba, s čimer je nastal nov pravni položaj.
This call should be reiterated, particularly in the light of Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, which has established a new legal situation.
Po mnenju poročevalke se mora prihodnji akcijski načrt zaradi razlogov, naštetih v nadaljevanju, osredotočiti na naslednje točke:
The rapporteur considers that the new action plan should focus on the following, for the reasons stated below:
Splošna evropska zakonodaja za dobro počutje živali2.
3. better enforcement of existing legislation
Boljše izvajanje obstoječe zakonodaje4.
4. the link between anim
Povezava med zdravstvenim varstvom živali in ljudi5.
al health and public health5.
Kazalniki in nove metode
indicators and new techniques
V Evropi obstaja aktivna volja za primerno ravnanje z našimi živalmi, ponašamo pa se tudi z dolgo tradicijo na tem področju.
In Europe there is an active desire to treat our animals decently, and we have a long tradition of doing so.
To tradicijo je treba ohraniti in okrepiti z novimi izkušnjami in stalno rastočim znanjem o naravnem vedenju živali ter z vsemi očitnimi povezavami med dobrim počutjem in zdravjem živali in ljudi.
This tradition should be maintained and enhanced, drawing on new experience and ever increasing knowledge of animals’ natural behaviour and all the evident links which exist between animal and human welfare and health.
Danes se države med seboj močno razlikujejo po ravneh zaščite živali, kar po eni strani vodi v zelo različne življenjske razmere za živali, po drugi strani pa tudi izkrivlja svobodno in pošteno konkurenco med proizvajalci.
At present, animal welfare standards vary a great deal between countries, which in some cases results in enormous variations in living conditions for animals, but also prevents free and equitable competition between producers.
Notranji trg je daleč najpomembnejše orodje za povezovanje Evrope in ohranitev miru in svobode za vse ljudi.
The internal market is absolutely the most important instrument of cohesion in Europe and the principal preserver of peace and freedom for all.
Na tem trgu moramo braniti svobodo in pravičnost na vseh področjih.
We should preserve freedom and equity on this market in all contexts.
Zato bi morala EU čim prej sprejeti splošno zakonodajo o dobrem počutju živali, ki bo živalim priznala pravico do dostojnega življenja in vsem proizvajalcem preprečila, da bi dajali na notranji trg živalske proizvode, ki niso skladni s pogoji iz splošne zakonodaje.
The EU ought therefore as soon as possible to adopt a strong general animal welfare law which accords animals the right to a life worth living and makes it impossible for any producer to offer animal products on the internal market which do not comply with the conditions laid down by the general law.
Hkrati mora imeti vsak proizvajalec, zadruga ali regija popolnoma proste roke pri prostovoljni uveljavitvi pravil in sistemov označevanja, ki presegajo zahteve splošne zakonodaje.
Such a law should both fulfil the requirements of a worthwhile life in accordance with the nature of each animal species and give all animal producers the same basic market conditions.
Takšna splošna zakonodaja mora prav tako jasno določiti, da je vsak lastnik živali v celoti odgovoren za svoje živali.
At the same time each producer, cooperative body or region should be absolutely free to adopt voluntary rules and labels which exceed the requirements of the general law.
Takšna okvirna zakonodaja ne sme biti nekakšna direktiva minimalnih standardov, temveč mora določiti visok skupen standard za vso ožjo zakonodajo na tem področju, na primer pravila za prevoz živali,
Such a general law must also indicate the obligation of all animal owners to assume full responsibility for their animals.
Takšen splošni okvir ne bi smela biti minimalna direktiva, temveč mora določiti visok splošni standard za vso podrobno zakonodajo na tem področju, kot so pravila o prevozu živali, podobno kot velja splošna zakonodaja EU o hrani, namreč Uredba (ES) št. 178/2002, na področju varnosti hrane.
Such a general framework should not be a minimum directive but set a high general standard for all detailed legislation in the field, such as rules on animal transport, in much the same way as the EU’s general law on food, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, functions in the field of food safety.
Seveda bo izvajanje strožje okvirne zakonodaje o dobrem počutju živali od vseh proizvajalcev zahtevalo časovni in denarni vložek ter trud za pridobitev znanja.
Naturally, implementing more stringent framework legislation on animal welfare will cost all producers time, effort to acquire know-how and money.
Znanje je mogoče dati na razpolago v okviru ustreznih baz znanja v državah članicah, organizacij proizvajalcev ali novega centra v EU.
Know-how can be made available using Member States’ own relevant databases, through producer organisations and via a new centre within the EU.
Kot državljani in potrošniki moramo biti vsi pripravljeni prispevati k financiranju močno okrepljenih standardov dobrega počutja živali.
Both as citizens and as consumers, we should all be ready to help finance greatly improved animal welfare standards.
Že sedaj je mogoče veliko črpati iz sredstev EU za razvoj podeželja, vendar ti viri niso zadostni.
Even now, considerable resources are available as part of the EU’s rural development funding, but these resources cannot be regarded as adequate.
Treba je določiti usklajevalen organ za dobro počutje in zdravstveno varstvo živali v EU.
A coordinating body is needed for animal welfare and animal health within the EU.
Manj pomembno je, ali bo to nalogo opravljal poseben oddelek pri Komisiji ali pa bo eno od obstoječih nacionalnih središč za dobro počutje živali dobilo usklajevalno vlogo.
Whether the function is entrusted to a department within the Commission or whether one of the existing national animal welfare centres is assigned a coordinating role is not so important.
Center mora temeljiti na „splošni zakonodaji za dobro počutje živali“ in zbirati vse razpoložljivo znanje ter imeti pravico, da daje pobude za nove raziskave v primeru odkritih vrzeli, kot je pri zelo uspešnem projektu „Animal Welfare Quality Project“ zaenkrat manjkajoče znanje o uporabi novih kazalnikov v praksi.
The centre should be based on the ‘general animal welfare law’ and gather all available knowledge; it should have the power to initiate new research when lacunae are observed, one example being the very successful Animal Welfare Quality Project, where knowledge is currently lacking as to how the new indicators should be applied in practice.
Center mora poleg tega v določenem času dati na voljo vso zbrano znanje ter svetovati v zvezi z uvajanjem novih metod.
The centre should also maintain a complete picture of knowledge at a given time and advise on the introduction of new technology.
Osnovni predpogoji za delovanje vsake zakonodaje – ne glede na področje – so spremljanje, nadzor in (na žalost) tudi kazni.
An absolute precondition to enable any law in any field to function is that there should be monitoring, supervision and (regrettably!) also penalties.
Pri tem mora imeti Komisija pristojnost in sredstva za vzpostavitev ciljno usmerjenega sistema nadzora na podlagi tveganja.
Here the Commission must be given powers and resources to enable it to establish a purposeful and risk-based monitoring system.
Države članice morajo poleg tega zagotoviti, da njihovi nadzorni organi vzdržujejo visok in enoten standard, ter določiti potreben sistem kazni za lastnike živali, ki ne izpolnjujejo zakonskih zahtev.
Member States must also ensure that their supervisory authorities maintain high and equivalent standards and must also operate the requisite system of penalties for animal owners who do not comply with legal requirements.
Obstajajo zelo dobri etični razlogi za vzdrževanje visokega standarda dobrega počutja živali – kar bi že samo po sebi moralo biti zadosten razlog za strogo zakonodajo in spoštovanje te zakonodaje.
There are strong ethical reasons for maintaining a high standard of animal welfare – which in itself ought to be adequate grounds for more stringent legislation and compliance with it.
Ne glede na to so pri skrbi za živali vsaj tako pomembni tudi vidiki zdravja ljudi.
Nonetheless, public health aspects of animal welfare are at least as important.
Neverjetno veliko bioloških dejavnikov je enakih pri vseh živih bitjih, toliko bolj pri sesalcih, med katere spada velika večina naših živali, pa tudi mi sami.
There are such an incredible number of biological factors which are the same for all living creatures, and even more for mammal species, which include both the vast majority of our animals and ourselves.
Živalim in ljudem so skupni strah in bolečina, veselje in prijateljstvo; imamo precej podoben imunski sistem in veliko skupnih patogenov.
Animals and human beings are alike in that they experience fear and pain, pleasure and friendship; we also have relatively similar immune systems and share many pathogens.
Živalske bolezni ne zadevajo le povezave med živalmi, namenjenimi prehrani, in zdravjem ljudi, temveč tudi divje živali in hišne živali, kot je npr. pri steklini, ki se je lahko nalezemo od divjih živali, ali toksoplazmozi, s katero se najpogosteje okužimo od domačih mačk.
Animal diseases affect us not only because of the relationship between food-producing animals and human health but also in the form of the diseases to which wild animals and our pets are prone, examples being rabies, which we can catch from wild animals, and toxoplasmosis, most often resulting from infection by our cats.
Zato obstaja veliko dobrih razlogov za razlago člena 13 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, kakor je bila spremenjena z Lizbonsko pogodbo, v smislu razširitve pristojnosti EU na vse živali.
There are therefore many good reasons for interpreting the new Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, as extending the EU’s powers to cover all animals.
Kot na vseh drugih področjih v družbi, stalno dopolnjujemo tudi naše znanje o naših živalih ter nenazadnje o boleznih živali in njihovem vplivu na naše zdravje.
As in all other fields in society, our knowledge of our animals, and particularly of animal diseases and their influence on our health, is growing all the time.
To znanje moramo uporabiti ter z njim nenehno izboljševati življenjske razmere živali in svoje zdravje.
We must use this knowledge so as constantly to improve both the lives of animals and our own public health.
V skupnem interesu je vzpostavitev evropske podatkovne baze o uporabi antibiotikov.
It would be in our common interest to establish a European database on the use of antibiotics.
Koliko se uporabljajo?
In what quantities are they used?
Kateri antibiotiki se predpisujejo?
Which antibiotics are prescribed?
Na katerih območjih?
In what geographical areas?
Na katerih področjih proizvodnje?
And in what fields of production?
Koliko antibiotikov se uporablja za hišne živali?
What quantities of antibiotics are used on pets?
Vprašanja so številna in pomembna, saj je odpornost na antibiotike – tako multi-rezistenca kot pan-rezistenca – zelo resna grožnja za zdravje otrok in mladih.
There are many vital questions, as antibiotic resistance – now taking the form of both multi- and pan-resistance – is above all a very serious threat to the health of children and the young.
Najhujše bolezni, ki neposredno ogrožajo življenje – npr. tuberkuloza – so ravno živalske bolezni, ki lahko povzročijo ogromno težav.
In absolute terms the most serious diseases and those which represent a direct threat to life, such as TB, are precisely animal diseases, which can cause enormous problems.
Tudi na tem področju bi moral imeti nov center EU za dobro počutje in zdravstveno varstvo živali pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju razvoja in razširjanju znanja.
Here too, a new EU centre for animal welfare and animal health could have an important role to play as a driving force and disseminator of knowledge.
Obstajajo etični in kulturni razlogi, pri čemer ne smemo niti za trenutek pozabiti na praktične, ekonomske in zdravstvene razloge, za vzdrževanje zelo visokega standarda dobrega počutja živali.
There are ethical and cultural reasons, without for one moment forgetting the practical, economic and public health reasons, for maintaining a very high standard of animal welfare.
Po mnenju poročevalke bi moral nov ambiciozen večletni akcijski načrt, osredotočen na navedene teme, prispevati k temu cilju.
In the rapporteur’s view, a new, ambitious multiannual action plan with the above focus would contribute to this.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 247/2006 o posebnih ukrepih za kmetijstvo v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union
Poročevalec: Luís Paulo Alves
Rapporteur: Luís Paulo Alves
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2009)0510 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2009)0510 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 36 in 37 ter člena 299(2) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerimi se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0255/2009 ),
– having regard to Articles 36, 37 and 299(2)of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0255/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom „Posledice uveljavitve Lizbonske pogodbe za medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja, ki so v teku“ ( KOM(2009)0665 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled "Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures" ( COM(2009)0665 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in členov 42, 43(2) in 349 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and Articles 42, 43(2) and 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0054/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7‑0054/2010 ),
(-1) Člen 349 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije poudarja pomen in posebnosti najbolj oddaljenih regij ter določa posebne ukrepe, katerih namen je zlasti opredeliti pogoje uporabe Pogodb za te regije, vključno s skupnimi politikami, pri čemer se upoštevajo njihove strukturne, socialne in gospodarske razmere, katerih sestavni del so oddaljenost, otoška lega, majhnost, težavna topografija in podnebje ter ekonomska odvisnost od maloštevilnih proizvodov, stalnost in součinkovanje teh dejavnikov pa močno otežujejo razvoj teh regij.
(-1) The importance and specificity of the outermost regions is underlined by Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which, taking account of their structural, social and economic situation, which is compounded by their remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate, and economic dependence on a few products, the permanence and combination of which severely restrain their development, provides for specific measures aimed, in particular, at laying down the conditions of application of the Treaties to those regions, including common policies.
Ti ukrepi se nanašajo na kmetijsko in ribiško politiko, pogoje za preskrbo s surovinami, državno pomoč ter pogoje dostopa do strukturnih skladov in horizontalnih programov Unije.
The measures concerned include agriculture and fisheries policies, conditions for supply of raw materials, State aids and conditions for access to structural funds and to horizontal Union programmes.
Poleg tega Lizbonska pogodba regije iz člena 349 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije prvič vključuje v člen 107 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, tako da pomoč za spodbujanje njihovega gospodarskega razvoja velja za skladno z notranjim trgom.
Moreover, the Lisbon Treaty has incorporated for the first time the regions referred to in Article 349 TFEU into Article 107 TFEU, so that aid to promote their economic development may be considered to be compatible with the internal market.
(-1 a) V skladu s členom 4(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 247/2006 lahko z odstopanjem od odstavka 4(2)(a) navedene uredbe Azori odpošljejo maksimalne letne količine sladkorja (oznaka KN 1701) v druge dele Unije.
(-1 a) Under Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 247/2006, the Azores are entitled to dispatch, by way of derogation from Article 4( 2 ) (a) of that Regulation , yearly maximum quantities of sugar (CN code 1701) to the rest of the Union .
Če se upošteva, da bi proizvodnja sladkorne pese lahko postala zelo pomembno dopolnilo proizvodnji mleka na Azorih, zlasti na otoku San Miguel, pri čemer je treba upoštevati negotovo prihodnost trga mleka po odločitvi o odpravi mlečnih kvot in o njihovem postopnem povečanju v tem času, je treba proizvajalcem in predelovalcem, če bo odločitev o odpravi kvot obveljala, ponuditi alternativo temu sistemu, s katero bi lahko mlečnemu sektorju na Azorih zagotovili trajnost in razvoj, pa tudi dolgoročne dopolnilne možnosti za kmetijstvo, ter gospodarskim subjektom omogočili, da dosežejo ustrezno raven industrijskih in tržnih dejavnosti, ki bo stabilizirala ekonomsko in socialno okolje na Azorih.
Given that sugar beet production could become a very significant complement to milk production in the Azores, in particular on S. Miguel island, and in view of the uncertain outlook regarding the milk market following the decision to abolish the milk quotas and progressively increase them in the meantime, it is necessary to offer producers and processors, if that decision to abolish the quota system is maintained, an alternative to that system which can guarantee the sustainability and the development of the milk sector in the Azores, as well as long - term complementary agricultural prospects, to enable economic operators to reach a level of industrial and commercial activities which stabilises the economic and social environment in the Azores .
Veljavno odstopanje je zato treba podaljšati do 31. decembra 2019.
The existing derogation should therefore be extended until 31 December 2019.
(2) Člen 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 247/2006 določa prehodno obdobje, v katerem se lahko Kanarski otoki še nadalje preskrbujejo z določenimi količinami izdelkov na osnovi mleka iz oznak KN 1901 90 99 in 2106 90 92, namenjenih industrijski predelavi.
(2) Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 provides for a transitional period during which the Canary Islands may continue to receive supplies of determined quantities of milk-based preparations falling within CN codes 1901 90 99 and 2106 90 92 intended for industrial processing.
To prehodno obdobje se izteče 31. decembra 2009.
This transitional period expires on 31 December 2009.
Proizvod iz oznake KN 1901 90 99 – posneto mleko v prahu z rastlinsko maščobo – je tradicionalni proizvod za lokalne potrošnike, tudi najrevnejše , in se prodaja na Kanarskih otokih zadnjih 40 let .
The product falling within CN code 1901 90 99 – skimmed milk powder with vegetable fat – is a traditional product for the local consumers, including the most deprived , and has been sold in the Canary Islands during the last 40 years.
Preskrba s tem proizvodom je ustvarila posebno lokalno industrijo, ki ustvarja nova delovna mesta in dodano vrednost.
The supply of this product has generated a specific local industry ensuring employment and added value.
Ob sedanji gospodarski krizi je ustrezno ohraniti preskrbo s tem posebnim proizvodom in podaljšati prehodno obdobje iz člena 6 navedene uredbe do 31. decembra 2013 .
In the current situation of economic crisis it is appropriate to maintain the supply of this specific product and to extend the transitional period set by Article 6 of that Regulation to 31 December 2013 .
Vendar je proizvod iz oznake KN 1901 90 99 –posneto mleko v prahu z rastlinsko maščobo – postal tradicionalni proizvod za lokalne potrošnike, tudi najrevnejše.
However, the product falling within CN code 1901 90 99 – skimmed milk powder with vegetable fat – has become a traditional product for the local consumers, including the most deprived .
Preskrba z njim je ustvarila posebno lokalno industrijo, ki ustvarja nova delovna mesta in dodano vrednost.
Its supply has generated a specific local industry ensuring employment and added value.
Zato je ustrezno ohraniti preskrbo s tem posebnim proizvodom , ki se uporablja le za lokalno porabo .
Therefore, it is appropriate to maintain the supply of this specific product , which is used for local consumption only .
Zaradi strukturnega pomanjkanja mleka na Kanarskih otokih je posneto mleko v prahu z rastlinsko maščobo postalo tradicionalen proizvod, ki ga kot nadomestek za mleko uporabljajo lokalni potrošniki, zlasti tisti v stiski.
Due to the structural milk deficit of the Canary Islands, skimmed milk powder containing vegetable fat has become a traditional product used by local consumers, especially the most needy, as a substitute for milk.
Tako mora biti veljavno odstopanje ne le podaljšano, ampak mora postati trajno.
Therefore, the existing derogation should not only be extended but be made permanent.