natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sklepa pa izhajata iz obdobja medvladnega sodelovanja v okviru Schengenskega sporazuma, zato ju je treba prilagoditi sedaj veljavnemu institucionalnemu in pravnemu okviru EU.
However, these decisions go back to the time of intergovernmental cooperation on Schengen and need to be adapted to the EU’s current institutional and legal framework.
Namen seznama potnih listin je dvojen: po eni strani omogoča organom mejne kontrole, da preverijo, ali je določena listina priznana za namen prehoda zunanjih meja, kot določa člen 5 (1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah); po drugi strani pa konzularnemu osebju omogoča, da preveri, ali države članice priznavajo določeno listino za namen pritrditve vizumske nalepke.
The purpose of the list of travel documents is twofold: on the one hand it allows border control authorities to verify whether a given travel document is recognised for the purpose of crossing the external borders as set out in Article 5 (1)(a) of Regulation(EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code); on the other hand it allows consular staff to verify whether Member States recognise a given travel document for the purpose of affixing the visa sticker.
V tem kontekstu in zaradi zagotavljanja čimbolj celovitih informacij za države članice na to temo se zdi potreben ukrep, ki bi zagotavljal sprotno dopolnjevanje seznama potnih listin.
In this context and to ensure information that is as complete as possible on the subject for Member States, a measure guaranteeing an ongoing updating of the list of travel documents would appear to be necessary.
Zaradi poenostavitve in učinkovitosti bi morale države članic uradno sporočati svoje stališče glede priznavanja ali nepriznavanja teh dokumentov.
Member States would be required to notify their position with respect to the recognition or non-recognition of these documents for the purposes of simplification and efficiency.
Poročevalka meni, da bi moral predlog, ki temelji na členu 77(2) PDEU (vprašanja o mejah), kot del zakonodaje EU prinesti dodano vrednost, in sicer z zagotovitvijo varnosti za mejne policiste, ki so zadolženi za preverjanje potnih listin na zunanjih mejah.
Rapporteur is of the opinion that the proposal, based on Article 77(2) TFEU (Border issues), has as such to present added value as a piece of Union legislation, namely by providing security to border guards who are entitled to check the travel documents at the external borders.
V nasprotnem primeru bi bil namen osnutka predloga popolnoma oslabljen.
Otherwise, the objective of the draft proposal would be completely undermined.
Seznam potnih listin bi moral zato biti pravno zavezujoč.
Therefore, the list of travel documents should be legally binding.
Poročevalka tudi meni, da predlagano besedilo spoštuje pristojnost držav članic glede priznavanja potnih listin, hkrati pa zagotavlja pravno varnost po koncu določenega obdobja, ki bi lahko bilo vsekakor daljše od tistega, ki ga predlaga Komisija.
Furthermore, rapporteur is of the opinion that the proposed wording would respect the competence of the Member States to recognise the travel documents but would, at the same time, ensure legal certainty after the given period, which could indeed be longer than proposed by the Commission.
Namen tega sklepa je ustvariti pravno varnost glede seznama potnih listin, zato poročevalka predlaga, da se pojasnijo posledice, ki bi nastale, če država članica v določenem obdobju ne sporoči svojega stališča.
The purpose of this Decision is to create the legal certainty with regard to the list of travel documents, therefore rapporteur proposes to clarify consequences of a failure to notify a Member State's position in the given time period.
Ta določba je skladna z izključno pristojnostjo držav članic glede priznavanja potnih listin, saj bi države vedno lahko sporočile, da ne priznajo določene potne listine.
This provision is consistent with the exclusive competence of Member States for the recognition of travel documents since they would always have the right to notify that they don't recognise the travel document concerned.
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolaou, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Heidi Hautala, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Zuzana Roithová, Michèle Striffler, Cecilia Wikström
Edit Bauer, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Heidi Hautala, Mariya Nedelcheva, Zuzana Roithová, Michèle Striffler, Cecilia Wikström
PRILOGA: PISMO ODBORA ZA REGIONALNI RAZVOJ...................................................10
ANNEX: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT.....................10
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2011)0155 – C7–0081/2011 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2011)0155 – C7‑0081/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sprejete na usklajevalnem sestanku 17. julija 2008 o Solidarnostnem skladu,
– having regard to the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008 on the Solidarity Fund,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0238/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0238/2011 ),
5. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj podpiše ta sklep skupaj s predsedujočim Svetu ter poskrbi za njegovo objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
Instructs its President to sign the decision with the President of the Council and arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;
z dne xxxxxxxxxx
of xxxxxxxxxxxxx
UL C […], […], str. […]. ,
OJ C […], […], p. […] ,
(4) Slovenija, Hrvaška in Češka republika so predložile vloge za uporabo tega sklada v zvezi s katastrofo, ki so jo povzročili plazovi in hude poplave.
(4) Slovenia, Croatia and the Czech Republic submitted their application to mobilise the Fund, concerning disaster caused by heavy flooding.
V splošnem proračunu Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 se uporabijo sredstva Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v znesku 19.546.647 EUR za prevzem obveznosti in plačila.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 19 546 647 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Komisija predlaga uporabo sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije za Slovenijo, Hrvaško in Češko republiko na podlagi točke 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund in favour of Slovenia, Croatia and the Czech Republic on the basis of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA).
Ta sporazum omogoča uporabo sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada z letno zgornjo mejo 1 milijarde EUR.
The IIA allows the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
Komisija je skupaj s predlogom za uporabo sklada za Slovenijo, Hrvaško in Češko republiko predložila tudi predlog spremembe proračuna (PSP št. 2/2011 z dne 25. marca 2011), da bi v proračun za leto 2011 vnesla sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila, kot zahteva točka 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
In parallel to the proposal to mobilise the Solidarity Fund in favour of Slovenia, Croatia and the Czech Republic, the Commission has presented a draft amending budget (DAB No 2/2011 of 25 March 2011) in order to enter in the 2011 budget the corresponding commitment and payment appropriations as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
Slovenija je zaprosila za pomoč iz Solidarnostnega sklada zaradi škode, ki so jo povzročile poplave po hudem deževju v obdobju med 17. septembrom 2010 in 20. septembrom 2010.
Slovenia applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund for damages caused by flooding which followed intense rainfall during the period from 17 September 2010 to 20 September 2010.
Poplave so prizadele 137 od 210 slovenskih občin in povzročile obsežno škodo infrastrukturi, podjetjem in zasebni lastnini.
The flooding affected 137 of Slovenia's 210 municipalities and caused widespread damage to infrastructure, businesses and private property.
Slovenski organi ocenjujejo skupno neposredno škodo na 251.300.861 EUR.
The Slovenian authorities estimate the total direct damage caused by the disaster at EUR 251 300 861.
Ta znesek predstavlja približno 115,45 % običajnega praga za uporabo sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada, ki velja za Slovenijo v letu 2010 in znaša 217.669 milijona EUR (0,6 % slovenskega BDP v skladu s podatki iz leta 2008).
This amount represents 115,45 % of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Slovenia in 2010 of EUR 217.669 million (i.e. 0,6 % of Slovenian GNI according to 2008 data).
Zato je mogoče nesrečo opredeliti kot „večjo naravno nesrečo“ v skladu z uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 in sodi na glavno področje uporabe Solidarnostnega sklada.
Therefore the disaster qualifies as a “major natural disaster” under the terms of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 and falls thus within the main field of application of the Solidarity Fund.
Hrvaška je zaprosila za pomoč iz Solidarnostnega sklada po hudem deževju med 17. in 22. septembrom 2010, ki je povzročilo hude poplave, ki so posebej prizadele območje zahodne Hrvaške.
Croatia applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund following intense rainfall from 17 to 22 September 2010 causing severe floods that particularly struck the area of Western Croatia.
Nastala je znatna škoda na infrastrukturi, v kmetijskem sektorju ter na zasebnem premoženju.
The disaster caused significant damages to infrastructure, to the agriculture sector and to private property.
Hrvaški organi so skupno neposredno škodo ocenili na 47.002.839 EUR.
The Croatian authorities estimate the total direct damage caused by the disaster at EUR 47 002 839.
Vendar so Hrvaško prizadele iste poplave, ki so izpolnile merilo za „večjo nesrečo“ v Sloveniji.
However, Croatia was affected by the same flooding disaster which led to the major disaster in Slovenia.
Češka republika je zaprosila za pomoč iz Solidarnostnega sklada, potem ko je v začetku avgusta 2010 v njenih severnih delih prišlo do hudega deževja, ki je povzročilo, da so reke prekoračile bregove, zaradi česar so bili ljudje prisiljeni zapustiti svoje domove in je nastala škoda na javni infrastrukturi, zasebnih domovih, kmetijstvu in podjetjih.
The Czech Republic applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund after, at the beginning of August 2010, its northern parts experienced unusual heavy rainfall triggering rivers to burst their banks, forcing people to leave their homes and causing damage to public infrastructures, private homes, agriculture and businesses.
Češki organi skupno neposredno škodo ocenjujejo na 436.477.560 EUR.
The Czech authorities estimate the total direct damage caused by the disaster at EUR 436 477 560.
Ta znesek pomeni približno 53 % običajnega praga za uporabo sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada, ki velja za Češko republiko v letu 2010 in znaša 824.03 milijona EUR (0,6 % BDP po podatkih iz leta 2008).
This amount represents 53 % of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to the Czech Republic in 2010 of EUR 824.03 million (i.e. 0,6 % of GNI based on 2008 data).
Ker skupna škoda ne presega običajnega praga za uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada, je bila vloga obravnavana na podlagi merila tako imenovanih „neobičajnih nesreč v regiji“, opredeljenega v zadnjem pododstavku člena 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2012/2002, ki določa pogoje uporabe Solidarnostnega sklada „v izjemnih okoliščinah“.
As total damage remains below the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund the application was examined on the basis of the criteria for so-called “extraordinary regional disasters” laid down in Article 2(2), final subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 setting out the conditions for mobilising the Solidarity Fund “under exceptional circumstances”.
V skladu s temi merili lahko regija izjemoma prejme pomoč iz sklada, kadar jo prizadene neobičajna nesreča, zlasti naravna, ki prizadene večji del prebivalstva ter ima resne in trajne posledice na življenjske pogoje in gospodarsko stabilnost regije.
Under these criteria, a region can exceptionally benefit from assistance from the Fund where that region has been affected by an extraordinary disaster, mainly a natural one, affecting the major part of its population, with serious and lasting repercussions on living conditions and the economic stability of the region.
Gre za naravno nesrečo.
The disaster is of natural origin.
V skladu z vlogo so poplave prizadele enotno povezano območje Češke republike, namreč regijo Liberec (Liberecký kraj) in sosednjo pokrajino Děčín, ki sodi v regijo Ústí nad Labem (Ústecký kraj).
According to the application the floods affected a coherent single area of the Czech Republic, namely the Liberec Region (Liberecký kraj) and the neighbouring District Děčín belonging to the Ústí nad Labem Region (Ústecký kraj).
Regija Liberec meji na Poljsko in Nemčijo, medtem ko pokrajina Děčín meji na Nemčijo.
The Liberec Region shares its borders with Poland and Germany, whereas the District Děčín is bordering on Germany.
Najmočnejše deževje in poplave so bile v povodju Nise in delno v povodju Labe.
The highest precipitation intensity and flooding occurred in the Nisa river basin and partly in the Elbe river basin.
V vlogi Češke republike je navedeno, da je bilo v regiji Liberec neposredno prizadetih 262.088 prebivalcev v 81 občinah (od skupaj 439.027 prebivalcev).
The Czech Republic's application states that in the Liberec Region 262 088 inhabitants in 81 municipalities were directly affected (out of a total of 439 027 inhabitants).
V pokrajini Děčín je bilo prizadetih 43 občin in približno 90 % vseh prebivalcev.
In the District of Děčín 43 municipalities were concerned with nearly 90 % of the total population affected.
V zvezi z zahtevo, da se dokažejo resne in trajne posledice na življenjske pogoje in gospodarsko stabilnost regije, so v vlogi poudarjeni uničenje bistvene infrastrukture (na primer na področju prometa, vode in energije), vpliv na podjetja in huda škoda na številnih družinskih domovih.
As regards the requirement to demonstrate serious and lasting repercussions on the living conditions and the economic stability of the region, the application highlights the destruction of vital infrastructures (such as in the fields of transport, water and energy), the impact on businesses and the severe damage to a great number of family homes.
Potem ko je preverila, ali vse vloge izpolnjujejo merila za upravičenost iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2012/2002, je Komisija predlagala uporabo sredstev iz Solidarnostnega sklada v znesku 7.459.637 EUR za Slovenijo, 1.175.071 EUR za Hrvaško in 10.911.939 EUR za Češko republiko, kar skupaj znaša 19.546.647 EUR .
After verifying that all applications comply with the eligibility criteria of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 the Commission proposed to mobilise the Solidarity Fund for an amount of EUR 7 459 637 for Slovenia, EUR 1 175 071 for Croatia and EUR 10 911 939 for the Czech Republic resulting in a total amount of EUR 19 546 647 .
Iz te vsote bo 18.371.576 EUR dodeljenih v okviru razdelka 3b finančnega okvira (Slovenija in Češka republika) ter 1.175.071 EUR v okviru razdelka 4 finančnega okvira (Hrvaška).V predlogu spremembe proračuna (PSP št. 2/2011 z dne 25. marca 2011) je zato predlagala naslednje:
From this sum EUR 18 371 576 are to be allocated under heading 3b (Slovenia and Czech Republic) and EUR 1 175 071 are to be allocated under heading 4 (Croatia) of the financial framework respectively.Consequently, in the draft amending budget (DAB No 2/2011 of 25 March 2011) the Commission made the following proposal:
Predlog spremembe proračuna št. 2/2011
Draft amending budget No. 2/2011
Poglavje 13 06 –Skupaj
Chapter 13 06 — Total
V skladu z internim dogovorom z Odborom za regionalni razvoj (REGI) mora ta odbor sodelovati v postopku, da bi konstruktivno podprl uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada.
According to an internal agreement with the Committee on Regional Development (REGI), this committee should be associated to the process, in order to provide constructive support and contribution to the implementation of the Solidarity Fund.
Po oceni vlog je odbor REGI Evropskega parlamenta podal stališče glede uporabe sredstev sklada, kot je navedeno v priloženem pismu.
Following the assessment of the requests, the REGI committee of the European Parliament gave its view on the mobilisation of the Fund, as expressed in the letter attached to the present report.
Predmet : Uporaba Solidarnostnega sklada EU v korist Češke republike, Slovenije in države kandidatke Hrvaške
Subject : Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund in favour of Czech Republic, Slovenia and candidate country Croatia
Evropska komisija je v predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije ( KOM(2011)0155 končno) obvestila Evropski parlament, da na podlagi vlog za dodelitev pomoči Slovenije, Češke republike in države kandidatke Hrvaške v zvezi s poplavami septembra 2010 predlaga uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada EU in da škodo po posameznih državah ocenjuje takole:
The European Commission has informed the European Parliament in its proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund ( COM(2011)0155 final) that on the basis of applications for assistance by Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and candidate country Croatia relating to the flooding disasters of September 2010 it proposes the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund estimating the damage caused per country as follows:
Država upravičenka
Beneficiary State
Znesek, ki temelji
Amount based
Skupni znesek
Total amount of
predlagane pomoči
aid proposed
Češka republika – poplave 2010
Czech Republic - flooding 2010
poplave 2010
flooding 2010
Ob upoštevanju obravnave teh vlog in najvišjega možnega zneska nepovratnih sredstev iz Sklada ter možnosti za prerazporeditev odobrenih sredstev v okviru razdelka, v katerem obstaja potreba po dodatnih izdatkih, Komisija predlaga uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v skupnem znesku 18.371.576 EUR, ki se bo dodelil v okviru razdelka 3b finančnega okvira, in 1.175.071 EUR, ki se bo dodelil v okviru razdelka 4 finančnega okvira.
In the light of the examination of the applications, and considering the maximum possible grant from the Fund as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations under the heading requiring additional expenditure, the Commission proposes to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund for a total amount of EUR 18 371 576 and EUR 1 175 071, to be allocated under heading 3b and 4 of the financial framework respectively.
Da bi se izognili nepotrebnemu odlašanju pri odobritvi tega ukrepa, ki ga Odbor za proračun namerava čim prej sprejeti, vas z zadovoljstvom obveščamo, da Odbor za regionalni razvoj ne nasprotuje uporabi sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada EU za dodelitev zgoraj navedenih zneskov v ustrezne razdelke finančnega okvira, kot je predlagala Evropska komisija in v skladu s pravili iz Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 in Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002.
In order to avoid undue delay in approving this measure which the Committee on Budgets intends to adopt as soon as possible, we are pleased to inform you that the Committee on Regional Development has no objection to the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to allocate the above mentioned amounts to the Financial Framework headings concerned as proposed by European Commission and in accordance with the rules laid down in the inter-institutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002.
Lep pozdrav,
Yours Sincerely
o prihodnosti socialnih storitev splošnega pomena
on the future of social services of general interest
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................23
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............22
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................27
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 26
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................31
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................30
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................34
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ...33
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................39
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................38
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti členov 2 in 3(3) Pogodbe, in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti členov 9, 14, 106, 151, 153(1)(j) in (k), 159, 160, 161 in 345 Pogodbe, ter protokola št. 26 k tej pogodbi,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Articles 2 and 3( 3 ) thereof, and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in particular Articles 9, 14, 106, 151, 153(1)(j) and (k), 159, 160, 161 and 345 thereof, and Protocol 26 thereto,
– ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti njenega člena 36
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Article 36 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov, ki jo je Evropska skupnost sklenila 26. novembra 2009
– having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which was concluded by the European Community on 26 November 2009
UL L 23, 27.1.2010, str.
OJ L 23, 27.1.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza
– having regard to Regulation No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and road
UL L 315, 3.12.2007. ,
OJ L 315, 3.12.2007. ,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na notranjem trgu, zlasti njenega člena 1(3)
– having regard to Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market, in particular Article 1(3) thereof