natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vse stroške, ki nastanejo zaradi dejavnosti opazovalcev v skladu s tem členom, krijejo države članice zastave in Komisija .
All costs arising from the operation of observers under this Article shall be borne by the flag Member States and the Commission .
Komisija bi morala kriti stroške programov opazovanja glede na to, da jih sama uvaja zaradi večje učinkovitosti nadzornega sistema.
The Commission should cover the cost of observation programmes, given that it is making them compulsory in order to make the control system more effective.
Države članice vzpostavijo in posodabljajo elektronsko zbirko podatkov, v katero nalagajo vsa poročila o inšpekcijskih pregledih in nadzorih, ki jih sestavijo njihovi uradniki.
Member States shall set up and keep up to date an electronic database where they upload all inspection and surveillance reports drawn up by their officials.
Države članice vzpostavijo in posodabljajo elektronsko zbirko podatkov, v katero nalagajo vsa poročila o inšpekcijskih pregledih in nadzorih, ki jih sestavijo njihovi uradniki , vključno s poročili opazovalcev .
Member States shall set up and keep up to date an electronic database where they upload all inspection and surveillance reports , including observer reports, drawn up by their officials.
Ni razloga, zakaj v zbirko podatkov ne bi vključili tudi poročil opazovalcev.
There would appear to be no reason not to put observer reports on the database as well.
Država članica, ki izvaja inšpekcijski pregled, lahko pregon kršitve prenese na pristojne organe države članice zastave , države članice registracije ali države članice, katere državljan je storilec, če se to opravi v dogovoru s to državo članico in pod pogojem, da je več verjetnosti za doseganje rezultatov iz člena 81(2).
The inspecting Member State may also transfer prosecution of the infringement to the competent authorities of the flag Member State or the Member State of registration or the Member State of which the offender is a citizen so long as this is done, with the agreement of the latter Member State and on condition that the transfer is more likely to achieve the result referred to in Article 81(2).
Država članica, ki izvaja inšpekcijski pregled, lahko pregon kršitve prenese na pristojne organe države članice zastave ali države članice, katere državljan je storilec, če se to opravi v dogovoru s to državo članico in pod pogojem, da je več verjetnosti za doseganje rezultatov iz člena 81(2).
The inspecting Member State may also transfer prosecution of the infringement to the competent authorities of the flag Member State or the Member State of which the offender is a citizen so long as this is done, with the agreement of the latter Member State and on condition that the transfer is more likely to achieve the result referred to in Article 81(2).
Člen 82 – odstavek 1
Article 82 – paragraph 1
Države članice zagotovijo, da se fizična oseba, ki je storila resno kršitev, ali pravna oseba, ki se šteje za odgovorno za resno kršitev, kaznuje z učinkovitimi, sorazmernimi in odvračilnimi upravnimi ukrepi v skladu z naborom kazni in ukrepov, določenih v poglavju IX Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008.
Member States shall ensure that a natural person having committed or a legal person held liable for a serious infringement is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative sanctions, in accordance with the range of sanctions and measures provided for in Chapter IX of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se fizična oseba, ki je storila resno kršitev, ali pravna oseba, ki se šteje za odgovorno za resno kršitev, praviloma kaznuje z učinkovitimi, sorazmernimi in odvračilnimi upravnimi ukrepi v skladu z naborom kazni in ukrepov, določenih v poglavju IX Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008.
Member States shall ensure that a natural person having committed or a legal person held liable for a serious infringement is in principle punished by effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative sanctions, in accordance with the range of sanctions and measures provided for in Chapter IX of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Da bodo pogoji enaki, morajo ukrepe uvesti vse države članice, in sicer v skladu z lastno zakonodajo, imeti pa morajo enako težo in enak učinek; pri tem je sorazmernost osnovno načelo in ne možnost.
In order to create a level playing field, measures must be taken in all Member States, in accordance with their own legislation which have the same weight and the same impact, proportionality being a basic principle and not an option.
Člen 82 – odstavek 3
Article 82 – paragraph 3
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
In case of a repeated serious infringement within a 5 year period, a Member State shall impose an administrative fine of a minimum of at least 10 000 EUR and a maximum of 600 000 EUR.
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
It is not logical to set a minimum figure for a maximum amount.
Člen 82 – odstavek 6 a (novo)
Article 82 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Države članice zagotovijo, da so gospodarski subjekti, za katere je ugotovljeno, da so odgovorni za resno kršitev pravil skupne ribiške politike, izključeni od ugodnosti, ki izhajajo iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo, sporazumov o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju ali druge državne pomoči.
Member States shall ensure that operators found liable for a serious infring e ment of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy are precluded from benefiting from the European Fisheries Fund, Fisheries Partnership Agreements and other public aid.
Poleg kazni, ki jih določa to poglavje, se določijo druge kazni ali ukrepi, zlasti povračilo javne pomoči ali subvencij, ki so jih v zadevnem finančnem obdobju prejela plovila, ki izvajajo nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov.
The sanctions provided for in this Chapter shall be accompanied by other sanctions or measures, in particular the repayment of public assistance or subsidies received by IUU vessels during the financing period concerned .
V skladu z odstavkom 7 člena 45 Uredbe 1005/2008 Evropskega sveta, ki kot možno kazen predvideva začasno ali stalno prepoved prejemanja državne pomoči ali pomoči Skupnosti, bo pogojevanje javnega financiranja s spoštovanjem predpisov spodbudilo gospodarske subjekte, da bodo upoštevali pravila skupne ribiške politike, ter pomagalo vzpostaviti enake pogoje za vse in zagotoviti, da državna pomoč ne bo podpirala nezakonitih dejavnosti.
According to article 45 paragraph 7 of Regulation 1005/2008 of the European Council where a temporary or permanent banning from benefitting of public or community aid is foreseen as a possible sanction to be applied, making public funding conditional upon compliance will provide an incentive for operators to comply with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy and will contribute to establishing a level playing field as well as ensuring that public aid is not supporting illegal activities.
Člen 84 – odstavek 1
Article 84 – paragraph 1
Države članice uporabijo sistem kazenskih točk, na podlagi katerega imetnik dovoljenja za ribolov prejme ustrezne kazenske točke zaradi kršenja pravil skupne ribiške politike.
Member States shall apply a penalty point system on the basis of which the holder of a fishing authorisation receives appropriate penalty points as a result of an infringement against the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Države članice uporabijo sistem kazenskih točk, na podlagi katerega imetnik dovoljenja za ribolov prejme ustrezne kazenske točke zaradi resnega kršenja pravil skupne ribiške politike.
Member States shall apply a penalty point system on the basis of which the holder of a fishing authorisation receives appropriate penalty points as a result of a serious infringement against the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Kazenske točke je treba dodeliti samo za tiste prekrške, za katere je bilo na ravni Sveta dogovorjeno, da so resni.
The penalty points should only apply to those infringements that have been agreed, at Council level, to be serious ones.
Člen 84 – odstavek 2
Article 84 – paragraph 2
Kadar fizična oseba stori resno kršitev ali se za pravno osebo domneva, da je odgovorna za kršitev pravil skupne ribiške politike, se imetniku dovoljenja za ribolov zaradi kršitve dodeli ustrezno število točk.
When a natural person has committed or a legal person is held liable for an infringement of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy, the appropriate number of points shall be assigned to the holder of the fishing authorisation as a result of the infringement.
Imetnik dovoljenja za ribolov ima pravico do revizije postopka v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
The holder of the fishing authorisation shall be entitled to review proceedings in accordance with national law.
Kadar fizična oseba stori resno kršitev ali se za pravno osebo domneva, da je odgovorna za resno kršitev pravil skupne ribiške politike, se imetniku dovoljenja za ribolov zaradi resne kršitve dodeli ustrezno število točk.
When a natural person has committed or a legal person is held liable for a serious infringement of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy, the appropriate number of points shall be assigned to the holder of the fishing authorisation as a result of the serious infringement.
Člen 84 – odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 84 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Dokler so imetniku dovoljenja za ribolov dodeljene kazenske točke, je v tem času izključen od prejemanja subvencij Skupnosti in nacionalne državne pomoči.
As long as a holder of a fishing authori s ation has been assigned penalty points , that holder shall be precluded from receiving Community subsidies and national public aid during that time.
Plovila, ki so naredila resne prekrške proti skupni ribiški politiki ne morejo prejemati državne pomoči.
Vessels which have committed serious infractions against the CFP should not be eligible for public aid.
Zaenkrat je izključitev lastnikov plovil, ki so bili obsojeni zaradi resnih kršitev, od pomoči Skupnosti, mogoča samo, če je to predvideno v nacionalni zakonodaji države članice.
Currently, the exclusion of vessel owners convicted of serious infringements from receiving Community aid, is so far only possible if it is provided for in the national legislation of a Member State.
Črtanje s seznama upravičencev mora biti obvezna, da davkoplačevalci ne bi subvencionirali plovil in gospodarskih subjektov, ki so bili obsojeni za kriminalna dejanja.
Removal from the list of eligible beneficiaries should be made mandatory so that taxpayer’s do not subsidise vessels and operators convicted of criminal activity.
Člen 84 – odstavek 4
Article 84 – paragraph 4
V primeru resne kršitve dodeljene kazenske točke znašajo najmanj polovico točk iz odstavka 3.
In the event of a serious infringement, the penalty points assigned shall be at least, equal to half of the points referred to in paragraph 3.
Ta odstavek je zato odveč.
This paragraph thus becomes superfluous.
Člen 84 – odstavek 5
Article 84 – paragraph 5
Če imetnik odvzetega dovoljenja za ribolov v treh letih od datuma zadnje kršitve ne stori druge kršitve, se mu brišejo vse točke iz dovoljenja za ribolov.
If the holder of a suspended fishing authorisation does not commit, within three years from the date of the last infringement, another infringement, all points on the fishing authorisation shall be deleted.
Če imetnik odvzetega dovoljenja za ribolov v treh letih od datuma zadnje resne kršitve ne stori druge resne kršitve, se mu brišejo vse točke iz dovoljenja za ribolov.
If the holder of a suspended fishing authorisation does not commit, within three years from the date of the last serious infringement, another serious infringement, all points on the fishing authorisation shall be deleted.
Države članice določijo tudi sistem kazenskih točk, na podlagi katerega kapitan in častniki plovila prejmejo ustrezne kazenske točke zaradi kršenja pravil skupne ribiške politike.
Member States shall also establish a penalty point system under which the master and the officers of a vessel receive appropriate penalty points as a result of an infringement against the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy committed by them.
Države članice določijo tudi sistem kazenskih točk, na podlagi katerega kapitan ali poveljnik plovila prejmejo ustrezne kazenske točke zaradi kršenja pravil skupne ribiške politike.
Member States shall also establish a penalty point system under which the master or the captain of a vessel receive appropriate penalty points as a result of an infringement against the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy committed by them.
Nesmiselno je, da se poleg lastnika in kapitana ali poveljnika kaznujejo častniki plovila, ne da bi s tem kakor koli dodatno koristili politiki nadzora.
It is absurd to penalise the officers of the vessel, in addition to the owner and captain or master, which entails no added benefits for the control policy.
Prav nasprotno, zaradi tega utegne biti zaposlovanje članov posadke, ki se lahko kaznujejo za odločitve o ulovih, pri katerih nimajo prav nobene odgovornosti, še težje.
On the contrary, it may make it even more difficult to recruit crew members if they can be punished for decisions on catches for which they have virtually no responsibility.
Če bi do take situacije prišlo, bi bili plovilo, lastnik in kapitan tako ali tako že kaznovani.
If such a situation were to arise, the vessel, owner and master would already be punished.
Člen 85 – odstavek 1
Article 85 – paragraph 1
Države članice v nacionalni zbirki podatkov evidentirajo vse kršitve pravil skupne ribiške politike, ki jih zagrešijo plovila, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, ali njihovi državljani, vključno z naloženimi kaznimi in številom dodeljenih točk.
Member States shall register in a national data base all infringements against rules of the Common Fisheries Policy, committed by vessels flying their flag or by their nationals, including the sanctions they incurred and the number of points assigned.
Države članice v svoji zbirki podatkov o kršitvah evidentirajo tudi kršitve, ki jih zagrešijo plovila, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, ali njihovi državljani in ki se preganjajo v drugih državah članicah, po prejemu obvestila o dokončnem sklepu sodno pristojne države članice v skladu s členom 82.
Infringements of vessels flying their flag or by their nationals prosecuted in other Member States shall also be entered by Member States in their national data base on infringements, upon notification of the definitive ruling by the Member State having jurisdiction, pursuant to Article 82.
Države članice v nacionalni zbirki podatkov evidentirajo vse kršitve pravil skupne ribiške politike, ki jih zagrešijo odgovorni za plovila, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, ali njihovi državljani, vključno z naloženimi kaznimi in številom dodeljenih točk.
Member States shall register in a national data base all infringements against rules of the Common Fisheries Policy, committed by those responsible for vessels flying their flag or by their nationals, including the sanctions they incurred and the number of points assigned.
Kršitev ne zagrešijo plovila, ampak njihovi upravljavci.
Infringements are not committed by the vessels themselves, but by those responsible for them.
To očitno dejstvo pomeni, da je treba natančno ugotoviti raven odgovornosti vpletenih fizičnih in pravnih oseb bodisi v operativnem smislu bodisi kot lastnikov plovil ali imetnikov ribolovnih dovoljenj.
This obvious fact means that rigorous assessments should be made of the level of responsibility of the natural and legal persons concerned, in operational terms or as ship-owners or fishing licence holders.
Plovilo se ne more samo odločati, zato je njihovo kaznovanje nesmiselno.
Vessels do not take decisions on their own; it is therefore ridiculous to penalise them as such.
S prihodom novega upravljavca/lastnika se lahko vzorci kršitev nekega plovila korenito spremenijo.
Infringement patterns may change radically with the arrival of a new captain or owner.
Člen 85 – odstavek 3
Article 85 – paragraph 3
Kadar država članica zaprosi drugo državo članico za informacije v zvezi s pregonom kršitve, zaprošena država članica zagotovi ustrezne informacije o zadevnih ribiških plovilih in osebah.
Where a Member State requests information from another Member State in relation to the prosecution of an infringement, that other Member State shall provide the relevant information on the fishing vessels and persons in question.
Kadar država članica zaprosi drugo državo članico za informacije v zvezi s pregonom kršitve, zaprošena država članica nemudoma zagotovi ustrezne informacije o zadevnih ribiških plovilih in osebah.
Where a Member State requests information from another Member State in relation to the prosecution of an infringement, that other Member State shall provide the relevant information on the fishing vessels and persons in question without delay .
Informacije je treba izmenjati hitro, da bi pristop analize tveganja, ki ga je predložila Komisija, deloval učinkovito.
Rapid exchange of information is necessary if the "risk analysis" approach proposed by the Commission is to function properly.
Člen 85 – odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 85 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Informacije o storjenih kršitvah, za katera je bila ribiškim plovilom in zadevnim posameznikom izrečena obsodba, bodo dostopne javnosti prek javnega dela spletnega mesta iz člena 107.
Information on infringements committed and for which a conviction has been obtained by the fishing vessels and individuals in question will be available to the public via the public part of the website referred in Article 107 .
Številne države članice omejujejo dostop do informacij in podatkov o številu in imenih nezakonitih, neprijavljenih in nereguliranih ribiških plovil v njihovih vodah.
Many Member States restrict detail and information on the extent and name of IUU fisheries in their water.
V Direktivi 31995L0046 (Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov, UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str.
Directive 31995L0046 (Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, O.J. L 281, 23/11/1995, p.
31-50) se v uvodni izjavi 34 navaja, da morajo biti tudi države članice pooblaščene, ko je to utemeljeno s pomembnim javnim interesom, da odstopajo od prepovedi o predelavi občutljivih kategorij podatkov, ko to opravičujejo pomembni razlogi v zvezi z javnim interesom na področjih, kot je javno zdravje in socialna varnost [...] znanstvene raziskave in vladna statistika.
31-50) states in its whereas 34 that Member States must also be authorized, when justified by grounds of important public interest, to derogate from the prohibition on processing sensitive categories of data where important reasons of public interest so justify in areas such as public health and social protection […]scientific research and government statistics.
Ob strah vzbujajočem zmanjšanju staleža rib in njegovem upravljanju, morajo biti podatki o resnih kršitvah v ribiškem sektorju na voljo javnosti, saj zadevajo javne vire in so kot taki opredeljeni kot pomembni razlogi za javni interes.
In the context of frightening depletion and management of fish stock, data on serious infringements in the fishery sector shall be available to the public, because they concern public resources and therefore defined as important reasons of public interest.
Člen 91 – odstavek 4
Article 91 – paragraph 4
Uradniki zadevne države članice morajo imeti možnost, da so prisotni med inšpekcijskim pregledom, in morajo uradnikom Komisije na njihovo zahtevo pomagati pri izvajanju njihovih nalog.
Officials of the Member State concerned shall be given the possibility to be present during the inspection and shall, at the request of the Commission officials, assist them to carry out their duties.
Uradniki zadevne države članice so vedno prisotni med inšpekcijskim pregledom, in morajo uradnikom Komisije na njihovo zahtevo pomagati pri izvajanju njihovih nalog.
Officials of the Member State concerned shall always be present during the inspection and shall, at the request of the Commission officials, assist them to carry out their duties.
Člen 95 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Article 95 – paragraph 1 – point a
α) določbe te uredbe niso bile izpolnjene zaradi delovanja ali opustitve delovanja, ki jo je mogoče neposredno pripisati zadevni državi članici, in da
α) the provisions of this Regulation have not been complied with as a result of an action or omission directly attributable to the Member State concerned, and that
Začasna ustavitev in ukinitev finančne pomoči Skupnosti je posebej strog ukrep, ki bo povzročil veliko problemov pri razvoju in izboljšanju ribiške industrije in ima socialne, ekonomske, okoljske in strukturne posledice.
The suspension and cancellation of Community funding is a particularly harsh measure which will create multiple problems for the development and improvement of the fishing industry, with social, economic, environmental and structural implications.
O izvajanju takega ukrepa je treba razmisliti le, ko gre za resno grožnjo.
Implementation of such a measure should be considered only in circumstances which constitute a serious threat.
Člen 96 – odstavek 1
Article 96 – paragraph 1
Kadar država članica ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti za izvajanje večletnega načrta in kadar ima Komisija razloge za sklepanje , da je neizpolnjevanje teh obveznosti posebno škodljivo za zadevne staleže, lahko Komisija začasno zapre ribolovna območja, na katera vplivajo te pomanjkljivosti.
Where a Member State does not respect its obligations for the implementation of a multiannual plan, and where the Commission has reasons to believe that the non respect of those obligations is particularly detrimental to the stock concerned, the Commission may provisionally close the fisheries affected by those shortcomings.
Kadar država članica ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti za izvajanje večletnega načrta in kadar ima Komisija dokaze , da je neizpolnjevanje teh obveznosti posebno škodljivo za zadevne staleže, lahko Komisija začasno zapre ribolovna območja, na katera vplivajo te pomanjkljivosti.
Where a Member State does not respect its obligations for the implementation of a multiannual plan, and where the Commission has evidence that the non respect of those obligations is particularly detrimental to the stock concerned, the Commission may provisionally close the fisheries affected by those shortcomings.
Komisija ima morda razloge za sklepanje o mnogih stvareh, vendar to ni objektivno merilo.
The Commission may have reasons to believe many things, but this is not an objective criterion.
Za zaprtje ribolovnega območja je potrebno nekaj, kar je trdnejše od suma.
Something greater than a suspicion should be required to close a fishery.
Člen 97 – odstavek 1 – uvodno besedilo
Article 97 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
Kadar Komisija ugotovi, da je država članica presegla svojo ribolovno kvoto, dodelitev ali delež staleža oziroma skupine staležev, ki so ji na voljo, lahko v naslednjem letu ali letih izvede odbitek od letne kvote, dodelitve ali deleža države članice, ki je presegla dovoljeni obseg ribolova, z uporabo multiplikatorja v skladu z naslednjo tabelo:
When the Commission has established that a Member State has overfished its quota, allocation or share of a stock or a group of stocks available to it the Commission shall operate deductions in the following year or years from the annual quota, allocation or share of the Member State which has overfished by applying a multiplying factor according to the following table: