natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Lani je Evropski parlament prejel peticije, ki jih je podprlo skoraj 30.000 državljanov Evropske unije, zlasti iz baltskih držav, v katerih je bila izražena zaskrbljenost zaradi načrtovane izgradnje plinovoda iz Rusije v Nemčijo pod Baltiškim morjem.
Last year the European Parliament received petitions supported by almost 30 000 European Union citizens, mainly from the Baltic States, expressing concern at the planned construction of a gas pipeline from Russia to Germany passing under the Baltic Sea.
Verjamejo, da projekt ogroža naravno okolje in bi bil lahko v nasprotju z zakonodajo Evropske unije.
They believe that the project poses a threat to the natural environment and could be contrary to European Union law.
Odbor za peticije, ki v imenu Evropskega parlamenta obravnava peticije državljanov, povezane z delovanjem Skupnosti, je ob upoštevanju velikega števila podpisnikov peticije in razsežnosti problema soglasno odločil, da bo pripravil poročilo o vplivu načrtovanega plinovoda na naravno okolje Baltiškega morja.
In deference to the large number of petitioners and the scale of the problem, the Committee on Petitions, which examines petitions from citizens relating to Community activities on behalf of the European Parliament, decided unanimously to draw up a report on the impact of the planned pipeline on the natural environment of the Baltic Sea.
Dva pristojna parlamentarna odbora (Odbor za zunanje zadeve in Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energijo) sta glede na večplastnost problema, ki je poleg vprašanja varstva okolja povezan tudi z vprašanjem energetske varnosti Unije in drugimi mednarodnimi vprašanji, oblikovala svoje mnenje.
In view of the multifaceted nature of the problem, which, in addition to the issue of environmental protection, also concerns the Union's energy security and other international issues, two competent parliamentary committees (the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy) have drawn up their own opinions.
Zaradi izrednega zanimanja za projekt in znatnega vpliva, ki bi ga lahko imel na temeljne dejavnosti EU, zlasti na javno zdravje, varstvo okolja in energetsko varnost, pa tudi na zvišanje cene plina, ki bi ga v končni fazi občutili potrošniki, je bila sprejeta pobuda za poglobljeno preučitev vprašanj, povezanih s tem projektom.
The unprecedented level of interest in the project and its potentially powerful impact on fundamental areas of EU activity, in particular public health, environmental protection and energy security, as well as an increase in gas prices which would ultimately be borne by consumers, provided an incentive for an in-depth examination of the problems related to this venture.
Evropski parlament je v zvezi s tem pripravil javno obravnavo, ki so se je udeležile vse zainteresirane strani in skupine ter izrazile svoja stališča.
With this in view, the European Parliament held a public hearing at which all parties and interest groups were present and expressed their points of view.
Poročevalec je po preučitvi različnih mnenj in presoj ter po govoru udeležencev javne obravnave prepričan, da mora Evropska unija ta projekt obravnavati z največjo previdnostjo in skrbjo, saj neposredno ogroža okolje celotnega bazena Baltiškega morja.
After examining the various opinions and assessments and after hearing the participants in the public hearing, your rapporteur is convinced that the European Union must treat this project with the utmost caution and concern, since it poses a direct threat to the environment of the Baltic Sea basin as a whole.
Problem ima resnično evropske razsežnosti, saj resno ogroža osem držav Evropske unije: Nemčijo, Švedsko, Finsko, Latvijo, Litvo, Estonijo, Dansko in Poljsko.
The problem has a genuine European dimension since it seriously affects eight European Union countries, namely Germany, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Denmark and Poland.
Poročevalec zato poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj uporabita vsa pravna sredstva, ki jih imata na voljo, za preprečitev gradnje severnoevropskega plinovoda v obsegu, ki ga predlagajo vlagatelji.
The rapporteur therefore calls on the Council and Commission to use all available legal means to prevent the construction of the Northern European gas pipeline on the scale proposed by the investors.
Zelo je zaskrbljen, ker so strokovne agencije, vladni organi, pristojni za okolje, in predstavniki okoljskih združenj po podrobni preučitvi projekta prišli do zaključka, da bi ta pomenil resno grožnjo za okolje, še zlasti:
Your rapporteur is gravely concerned that in recent months, in virtually all the Baltic countries, expert agencies, government bodies responsible for the environment and representatives of environmental associations have examined the fundamentals of the project and concluded that it would pose serious threats to the environment, including:
3. izreden obseg območja izgradnje v velikosti 2400 km 2 (kar je primerljivo s površino Velikega vojvodstva Luksemburg) v Baltiškem morju, ki je razmeroma majhno in zaprto;
The unprecedented size of the construction zone (2400 km 2 - the same size as the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg), in a sea such as the Baltic, which is relatively small and enclosed;
Tveganje za okolje, ki so ga na javni obravnavi podrobno predstavili različni strokovnjaki, so v svojih mnenjih in stališčih potrdile tudi druge organizacije, ki so se obrnile na poslance Parlamenta, vključno z nordijsko organizacijo Greenpeace, ki je v svoji izjavi izrazila zaskrbljenost nad načrtovanim plinovodom družbe Nord Stream in nasprotovanje temu projektu ter podprla kopensko pot.
The environmental risks set out in detail by various experts at the public hearing are confirmed by the opinions and the viewpoints of other organisations which have approached Members of Parliament, including Nordic Greenpeace, which forwarded a statement expressing its concern and opposition to the planned Nord Stream pipeline and expressing support for the overland option.
Poročevalec se ne strinja s stališčem, da je projekt izgradnje plinovoda na dnu Baltiškega morja dvostransko vprašanje med Nemčijo in Rusijo.
Your rapporteur cannot accept the viewpoint that a project affecting the Baltic seabed is a bilateral matter for Germany and Russia.
Varstvo okolja Baltiškega morja je ena od najpomembnejših nalog severne dimenzije EU, o kateri je govora v več resolucijah in pravnih aktih o tem vprašanju.
Protection of the Baltic Sea environment is one of the most important tasks facing the so-called Northern dimension of the EU, and one which is addressed in a series of Community resolutions and legal instruments dealing with this issue.
Evropska unija mora v zvezi s tem posebno pozornost nameniti okolju Baltiškega morja ter zagotoviti solidarnost, energetsko varnost in varstvo potrošnikov.
In this connection, the European Union has a duty to devote special care to the Baltic Sea environment, not forgetting also the need for solidarity, energy security and consumer protection.
Evropske institucije so se večkrat odločno odzvale na projekte v posameznih državah članicah, ki so vzbujali dvome glede varstva okolja in so zadevali le eno državo.
There have been cases where European institutions have reacted firmly to inter-state projects with dubious effects on the environment where these ultimately affected only one state.
Nepojmljivo bi bilo, da institucije EU ne bi skrbno obravnavale vprašanja, ki je povezano s tretjino njenih držav članic in edinim zaprtim morjem Skupnosti.
It is hard to imagine that the EU institutions will treat lightly a case which in practice affects one third of its Member States and its only enclosed sea.
Poročevalec poziva Komisijo, naj tako analizo izvede v dialogu z zainteresiranimi državami, vlagatelji in Helsinško komisijo ter v sodelovanju z zainteresiranimi nevladnimi organizacijami.
In this connection, your rapporteur urges the Commission to undertake such an analysis, as part of a dialogue with the countries concerned, the investors and the Helsinki Commission and with the participation of interested NGOs.
Podpira odločitev švedske vlade z dne 12. februarja 2008, ki je zavrnila podelitev dovoljenja družbi Nord Steam za izgradnjo plinovoda zaradi znatnih postopkovnih in vsebinskih pomanjkljivosti, zlasti ker ni predložila nobene študije o nadomestnih poteh ali možnosti opustitve izgradnje plinovoda.
Your rapporteur supports the decision of 12 February 2008 by the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden refusing to grant the company Nord Stream permission to build the pipeline because of significant substantive and procedural shortcomings and, in particular, the failure to submit any study of alternative routes or the option of abandoning the construction of the pipeline.
Podpira tudi stališče, ki ga je sprejel litovski parlament 27. marca 2007 in v katerem je poudaril, da je treba odložiti izvajanje obsežnih infrastrukturnih projektov v Baltiškem morju, dokler se ne izvede podrobna analiza nadomestnih rešitev skupaj s samostojnimi in obsežnimi presojami vplivov na okolje.
Your rapporteur also supports the position adopted by the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania on 27 March 2007, pointing to the need to suspend large-scale infrastructure projects in the Baltic until detailed studies of alternative options have been undertaken together with independent and comprehensive environmental impact assessments.
Seznanjen je z odločitvijo estonske vlade z dne 21. septembra 2007, ki je družbi Nord Stream zavrnila dovoljenje za podmorsko raziskovanje v estonski izključni ekonomski coni.
The rapporteur also takes note of the decision of 21 September 2007 by the Government of Estonia refusing Nord Stream permission to carry out underwater studies in its exclusive economic zone.
Prav tako želi opozoriti na problem, ki je povezan s kritjem škode, nastale pri izgradnji in uporabi plinovoda ter njegovi razstavitvi po prenehanju delovanja.
Your rapporteur also wishes to draw attention to the problem of covering the cost of damage caused during the construction and use of the pipeline and the cost of dismantling it at the end of its period of operation.
Menijo, da bi ogromni stroški, povezani z izvedbo projekta, kljub izrednim varnostnim ukrepom in plačilom nadomestila zaščitenim območjem Natura 2000 za povzročeno škodo po nekaj letih vplivali na cene plina v Evropi, kar bi zlasti občutili nemški potrošniki in podjetja, ki so gradila plinovod.
In their opinion, even if the project is completed within a number of years, after taking exceptional security measures and paying compensation for damage to Natura 2000 protected areas, the enormous cost is bound to affect European gas prices, particularly German consumers and the companies building the pipeline.
Strokovnjaki menijo, da bodo stroški tega projekta nekajkrat višji od stroškov možne nadomestne poti po kopnem.
These experts believe that the costs involved would be several times greater than the cost of a land-based alternative.
za Odbor za peticije
for the Committee on Petitions
o okoljskem vplivu načrtovanega plinovoda skozi Baltsko morje, ki naj bi povezal Rusijo in Nemčijo
on the environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za peticije kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Petitions, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. poudarja, da se mora varnost oskrbe z energijo obravnavati kot bistven del splošne varnosti Evropske unije, pri čemer ne sme biti opredelitev varnosti oskrbe z energijo omejena le na pomanjkanje notranje proizvodnje EU, ampak mora upoštevati tudi geopolitične vidike odvisnosti od uvoza;
Underlines that energy security must be regarded as an essential component of the overall security of the European Union, whereby the definition of energy security should not be merely limited to the lack of internal EU production but should also take into account the geopolitical aspects of dependency on imports;
5. meni, da je plinovod Severni tok infrastrukturni projekt s široko politično in strateško razsežnostjo za EU in Rusijo; razume pomisleke držav članic EU v zvezi z gradnjo in vzdrževanjem plinovoda; poudarja, da se zmožnosti majhnih obalnih držav, da zagotavljajo varno oskrbo z energijo v regiji Baltskega morja ne sme obravnavati ločeno od zmožnosti EU, da pri energetskih vprašanjih nastopa enotno in usklajeno, ter se sklicuje na svojo resolucijo z dne 26. septembra 2007 o zunanjih odnosih na področju energetike
Is of the opinion that Nord Stream is an infrastructure project with a wide political and strategic dimension for both the EU and Russia; understands the concerns expressed by EU Member States regarding the construction and maintenance of the pipeline; underlines that the ability of small littoral states to act as security providers in the Baltic Sea region cannot be seen in isolation from the EU's ability to act as a unified entity and speak with one voice on energy issues and recalls its resolution of 26 September 2007 on a common European foreign policy on energy
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0413 . ; poudarja, da je bil projekt v zadnjih smernicah za vseevropska energetska omrežja, sprejetih septembra 2006, označen za projekt evropskega interesa, ter da ga je treba načrtovati v duhu skupne evropske zunanje energetske politike;
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0413 . ; underlines that the project has been labelled a project of European interest in the latest guidelines on Trans-European Energy Networks (TENE-E), adopted in September 2006, and that it should be planned in the spirit of the common European foreign policy on energy;
9. obžaluje obrobno vlogo EU, zlasti Evropske komisije, v tem projektu; poudarja, da bi večje vključevanje EU zmanjšalo negotovost veliko držav članic v zvezi s projektom plinovoda Severni tok;
Regrets the marginal role of the EU in this project, in particular that of the Commission; points out that greater EU involvement would reduce the uncertainty felt by many Member States about the Nord Stream project;
– ocenijo različne gospodarske, proračunske ter ureditvene in pravne vidike glede projekta Severni tok ter vidike glede preglednosti;
– to assess the various transparency-related, economic, budget-related, regulatory and legal aspects of the Nord Stream project;
– izvedejo študijo prispevka plinovoda Severni tok k evropskim potrebam po energiji, vključno s preučitvijo vseh nadomestnih možnosti;
– to undertake a study of Nord Stream’s contribution to Europe’s energy needs, including a consideration of all alternatives;
– zagotovi vključevanje družbe Nord Stream in z njo povezanih podjetij v odprt in pregleden dialog v tesnem sodelovanju z vsemi zadevnimi stranmi o vseh vidikih in na vseh stopnjah pred gradnjo plinovoda Severni tok in po njej;
– to ensure that Nord Stream and its affiliated companies engage in an open and transparent dialogue and cooperate closely with all parties concerned on all aspects throughout all stages before and after construction of the Nord Stream pipeline;
– zagotovijo, da se v neodvisni presoji vplivov na okolje ustrezno upoštevajo vprašanja vseh obalnih držav;
– to ensure that the concerns of all littoral states are duly taken into account in the independent environmental impact assessment;
– ponovno pozovejo Rusijo k ratifikaciji konvencije iz Espooja in pogodbe o energetski listini, vključno z njenim protokolom o tranzitu, in zavezi, da se njihove določbe izvajajo v celoti;
– to reiterate its call for the ratification of, and commitment to full implementation of the provisions of, the Espoo Convention and the Energy Charter Treaty, including the Transit Protocol thereto, by Russia;
12. predlaga uvedbo skupnega nadzora nad plinovodom, vključno z vsemi državami v regiji Baltskega morja; poleg tega meni, da mora Komisija posebno pozornost nameniti pregledu okoljskega vidika načrtovane gradnje plinovoda z vsemi obstoječimi pravnimi instrumenti, ki jih ima na voljo, na zahtevo države članice pa tudi z neposredno vključitvijo Helsinške komisij in s tesnim sodelovanjem z njo;
Suggests the establishment of a common supervision of the pipeline including all the countries in the Baltic Sea region; furthermore, considers it essential for the Commission to pay close attention to the screening of an environmental aspect of the planned pipeline construction, by using all existing legal instruments available to the Commission, and, upon request by a Member State, through the direct involvement of, and in close cooperation with, HELCOM (the Helsinki Commission);
14. močno podpira tretji energetski liberalizacijski paket, vključno s klavzulo o tretjih državah, ker lahko le močan in liberaliziran evropski energetski trg, opremljen z instrumenti, potrebnimi za obvladovanje monopolnega vedenja, zagotovi varnost oskrbe z energijo;
Expresses its strong support for the third energy liberalisation package, including the third-country clause, because only a vibrant and liberalised European energy market, equipped with the tools needed to counteract monopolist behaviour, can guarantee security of energy supplies;
o okoljskem vplivu načrtovanega plinovoda skozi Baltsko morje, ki naj bi povezal Rusijo in Nemčijo
on the Environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko poziva Odbor za peticije kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Petitions, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
6. opozarja, da člen 79 Konvencije ZN o pomorskem pravu iz leta 1982 določa, da se mora o opredelitvi smeri polaganja takega plinovoda na epikontinentalnem pasu strinjati obalna država, čeprav je polaganje podmorskega plinovoda na epikontinentalnem pasu v skladu z izhodom na odprto morje;
Recalls that, although the laying of submarine pipelines on the continental shelf is in accordance with the freedoms of the high seas, Article 79 of the 1982 UN convention on the law of the sea provides that 'the delineation of the course for the laying of such pipelines on the continental shelf is subject to the consent of the coastal State';
11. meni, da ima onesnaženje, ki ga povzročajo dejavnosti ruskih vojaških oporišč, lahko ekološke posledice, ko bo projekt Severni tok enkrat izveden, in zato poziva, naj se oceni tudi ta vidik;
Considers that the pollution caused by the activities of Russian military bases may have ecological consequences once the Nord Stream project has been carried out, and therefore calls for this aspect also to be assessed;
16. poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj oceni presojo vplivov plinovoda na okolje, ki jo je izvedla družba Nord Stream, njeno skladnost z okoljsko zakonodajo EU ter njeno točnost, celovitost in objektivnost;
Calls on the European Commission to evaluate the EIA of the gas pipeline conducted by the Nord Stream company, its conformity with EU environmental legislation and its accuracy, thoroughness and objectivity;
18. ob upoštevanju tretjega zakonodajnega paketa o notranjem trgu za plin poziva družbo Nord Stream AG, naj ohrani enostaven dostop za sosednje države članice, če želijo biti neposredno povezane s plinovodom prek stranskih vodov.
Mindful of the third legislative package on the internal market in gas, calls on Nord Stream to maintain easy access to the Nord Stream gas pipeline for neighbouring Member States if they wish to be directly connected to the pipeline by means of spur lines.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................47
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................52
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................52
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............57
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ..........................80
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 86
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu (KOM(2007) 0530),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0530 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0318/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0318/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter mnenj Odbora za proračun, Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6-0226/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0226/2008 ),
Odstavka 1 a in 1 b (novo)
Paragraphs 1 a and 1 b (new)
Če se ustanovi Agencija za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev, je treba upoštevati vse možnosti financiranja, ki so predvidene v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2007 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju 1 .
In the event that an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators is established, all financing options provided for in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management 1 should be considered .
(3) Delo skupine ERGEG je od ustanovitve pozitivno prispevalo k notranjemu trgu z električno energijo in plinom.
(3) The work undertaken by ERGEG since its establishment has made a positive contribution to the internal market in electricity and gas.
Vseeno sektor na splošno priznava in skupina ERGEG predlaga, da se prostovoljno sodelovanje nacionalnih regulativnih organov sedaj odvija v okviru strukture Skupnosti z jasnimi pooblastili in s pristojnostjo, da sprejema posamezne regulativne odločitve v številnih posebnih primerih.
However, it is widely recognised by the sector, and has been proposed by ERGEG itself, that voluntary cooperation between national regulatory authorities should now take place within a Community structure with clear competences and with the power to adopt individual regulatory decisions in a number of specific cases.
(4a) Države članice bi morale za doseganje ciljev energetske politike Skupnosti tesno sodelovati in odpraviti ovire za čezmejne izmenjave električne energije in plina.
(4a) Тhe Member States should cooperate closely, eliminating obstacles to cross-border exchanges of electricity and gas with a view to achieving the objectives of Community energy policy.
Ustanovitev Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev (Agencija), ki bi zapolnila vrzeli, bo pripomogla k vključitvi perspektive Skupnosti v prakse nacionalnih regulativnih organov ter k večjemu spoštovanju načel Skupnosti o enakem obravnavanju in pravičnih pogojih dostopa do vseevropskih omrežij za transport plina in električne energije ter posledično k dobremu delovanju notranjega energetskega trga.
Establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (Agency) to fill the gap serves the dual purpose of incorporating the Community perspective into the national regulatory authorities’ practices and of contributing towards enhancing the effectiveness of the Community principles of equal treatment and fair conditions of access to the trans-European networks for transporting gas and electricity, and thus to the proper functioning of the internal energy market.