natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice lahko predvidijo, da lahko organ, pristojen za revizijske postopke, upošteva verjetne posledice začasnih ukrepov za interese glede obrambe in varnosti in da se lahko odloči, da teh ukrepov ne uvede, če bi njihove negativne posledice presegale njihove koristi.
Member States may provide that the body responsible for review procedures may take into account the probable consequences of interim measures for the interests of defence and security, and may decide not to grant such measures when their negative consequences could exceed their benefits.
Odločitev o tem, da se začasni ukrepi ne uvedejo, ne vpliva na nobene druge pravice osebe, ki te ukrepe zahteva.
A decision not to grant interim measures shall not prejudice any other claim of the person seeking such measures.
Države članice lahko določijo, da mora organ s potrebnimi pooblastili, kadar se nadomestilo za škodo zahteva na podlagi protizakonito sprejete odločitve, najprej razveljaviti izpodbijano odločitev.
Member States may provide that where damages are claimed on the grounds that a decision was taken unlawfully, the contested decision must first be set aside by a body having the necessary powers.
Razen v primerih, navedenih v členih [38f], [38g] in [38h], se učinki izvajanja pooblastil iz odstavka 1 tega člena na pogodbo, ki se sklene po oddaji naročila, določijo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
Except where provided for in Articles [38f] , [38g] and [38h], the effects of the exercise of the powers referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article on a contract concluded subsequent to its award shall be determined by national law.
Poleg tega lahko država članica, razen kadar je treba odločitev razveljaviti pred dodelitvijo nadomestila za škodo, predvidi, da se po sklenitvi pogodbe v skladu s členom [38a](5), odstavkom 3 tega člena ali s členi [38c] do [38h], pooblastila organa, pristojnega za revizijo, omejijo na dodelitev odškodnine osebam, ki so bile oškodovane zaradi kršitve.";
Furthermore, except where a decision must be set aside prior to the award of damages, a Member State may provide that, after the conclusion of a contract in accordance with Article [38a] ( 5 ) , paragraph 3 of this Article or Articles [38c] to [38h], the powers of the review body shall be limited to awarding damages to any person harmed by an infringement.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se odločitve, ki jih sprejmejo organi, pristojni za revizijske postopke, lahko učinkovito izvajajo.
Member States shall ensure that decisions taken by bodies responsible for review procedures can be effectively enforced.
Kadar organi, pristojni za revizijske postopke, po svoji naravi niso sodni, morajo vedno navesti pisne razloge za svoje odločitve.
Where bodies responsible for review procedures are not judicial in character, written reasons for their decisions shall always be given.
Člani takšnega neodvisnega organa so imenovani in razrešeni pod istimi pogoji kakor člani sodstva, kar zadeva organ oblasti, odgovoren za njihovo imenovanje, mandat in razrešitev.
The members of such an independent body shall be appointed and leave office under the same conditions as members of the judiciary as regards the authority responsible for their appointment, their period of office, and their removal.
Vsaj predsednik tega neodvisnega organa mora imeti isto pravno in strokovno usposobljenost kakor člani sodstva.
At least the President of this independent body shall have the same legal and professional qualifications as members of the judiciary.
Neodvisni organ sprejema svoje odločitve po postopku, v katerem sta zaslišani obe strani, te odločitve pa so pravno zavezujoče na načine, ki jih določi vsaka država članica.
The independent body shall take its decisions in a procedure in which both sides are heard , and these decisions shall, by means determined by each Member State, be legally binding.
Poleg tega lahko države članice zagotovijo, da so člani revizijskih organov vseh stopenj pooblaščeni za obravnavno občutljivih informacij.
In addition, Member States may ensure that the members of review bodies at all instances are individually authorised to handle sensitive information.
Države članice lahko oblikujejo ali določijo poseben revizijski organ, ki bo pristojen izključno za revizije na področju varnosti in obrambe.
Member States may establish or designate a special review body to take sole responsibility for reviews in the fields of security and defence.
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 2 direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 2 of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Ta sprememba je namenjena dopolnitvi zahtev o revizijskem postopku.
This amendment is intended to complete the requirements of the review procedure.
Člen 38 c (novo)
Article 38 c (new)
Člen 38c
Article 38c
Obdobje mirovanja
Standstill period
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo osebe, navedene v členu [38a](3), na voljo primerne roke, ki jim omogočajo učinkovita pravna sredstva zoper odločitve naročnikov o oddaji naročila, in sicer tako, da sprejmejo potrebne določbe, ki upoštevajo minimalne pogoje, navedene v odstavku 2 in členu [38e].
Member States shall ensure that the persons referred to in Article [38a](3) have sufficient time for effective review of the contract award decisions taken by contracting authorities, by adopting the necessary provisions respecting the minimum conditions set out in paragraph 2 of this Article and in Article [38e].
Do sklenitve pogodbe, ki sledi odločitvi o oddaji javnega naročila s področja uporabe te direktive, ne sme priti pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko se zadevnim ponudnikom in kandidatom po faksu ali po drugih elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstvih pošlje odločitev o oddaji naročila oziroma, če so bila uporabljena druga komunikacijska sredstva, pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je bilo zadevnim ponudnikom in kandidatom poslano obvestilo o odločitvi o oddaji naročila, ali od roka 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema odločitve o oddaji naročila.
A contract may not be concluded following the decision to award a contract falling within the scope of this Directive before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of a period of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of the contract award decision.
Zadevni ponudniki so tisti, ki niso bili dokončno izključeni.
Tenderers shall be deemed to be concerned if they have not yet been definitively excluded.
Izključitev je dokončna, če je bil zadevni ponudnik o njej obveščen in jo neodvisni revizijski organ šteje za zakonito ali če izključitev ne more več biti predmet revizijskega postopka.
An exclusion is definitive if it has been notified to the tenderers concerned and has either been considered lawful by an independent review body or can no longer be subject to a review procedure.
Zadevni kandidati so tisti, ki jim naročnik ni zagotovil informacij o zavrnitvi njihovih prošenj pred objavo odločitve o oddaji naročila zadevnim ponudnikom.
Candidates shall be deemed to be concerned if the contracting authority has not made available information about the rejection of their application before the notification of the contract award decision to the tenderers concerned.
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 2a direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 2a of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Z vključitvijo revizijskega postopka v to direktivo bi dosegli pravo odprtost trga, zagotovili učinkovito pravno varstvo za zadevne ponudnike ter preglednost in nediskriminacijo pri oddaji naročil brez poseganja v potrebo držav članic, da varujejo zaupne informacije.
The inclusion of a review procedure in this Directive is intended to achieve genuine market opening, provide effective legal protection for tenderers and ensure transparency and non-discrimination in the award of contracts without prejudice to Member States' need to protect secret information.
Člen 38 d (novo)
Article 38 d (new)
Article 38d
Article 38d
Odstopanja od obdobja mirovanja
Derogations from the standstill period
Države članice lahko določijo, da se roki iz člena [38c](2 ) ne uporabljajo v naslednjih primerih:
Member States may provide that the periods referred to in Article [38c](2) do not apply in the following cases:
(a) kadar ta direktiva ne zahteva predhodne objave obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
(a) if this Directive does not require prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union;
(b) če je edini zadevni ponudnik v smislu člena [38c](2) tisti ponudnik, ki mu je naročilo oddano, in to ne zadeva nobenega kandidata;
(b) if the only tenderer concerned within the meaning of Article [38c](2) is the one who is awarded the contract and there are no candidates concerned;
(c) kadar gre za naročila, ki temeljijo na okvirnem sporazumu, kakor določa člen 21.
(c) in the case of a contract based on a framework agreement as provided for in Article 21.
Če se uporablja to odstopanje, države članice zagotovijo, da je pogodba v skladu s členoma [38f] in [38 h] te direktive neveljavna, kadar:
If this derogation is invoked, Member States shall ensure that the contract is ineffective in accordance with Arti cles [38f] and [38h] if :
– gre za kršitve drugega pododstavka člena 21(4) in
- there is an infringement of the second subparagraph of Article 21(4) , and
– se ocenjuje, da je vrednost naročila enaka ali višja od pragov, navedenih v členu 6.
- the estimated value of the contract is equal to or exceeds the thresholds set out in Article 6.
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 2b direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 2b of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Člen 38 e (novo)
Article 38 e (new)
Člen 38e
Article 38e
Roki za vložitev zahtevka za revizijo
Time limits for applying for review
Če države članice določijo, da je treba vse zahtevke za revizijo zoper naročnikovo odločitev, sprejeto v okviru ali v zvezi s postopkom oddaje javnega naročila s področja uporabe te direktive, vložiti pred iztekom določenega roka, znaša ta rok vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je bila ponudniku ali kandidatu po faksu ali elektronsko poslana naročnikova odločitev, oziroma – če se uporabijo druga komunikacijska sredstva – vsaj 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je ponudniku ali kandidatu poslana naročnikova odločitev ali vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema naročnikove odločitve.
Where a Member State provides that any application for review of a contracting authority's decision taken in the context of, or in relation to, a contract award procedure falling within the scope of this Directive must be made before the expiry of a specified period, this period shall be at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting authority's decision is sent to the tenderer or candidate if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, this period shall be either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting authority's decision is sent to the tenderer or candidate or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of the contracting authority's decision.
Vsakemu ponudniku ali kandidatu je treba poleg te naročnikove odločitve sporočiti tudi povzetek ustreznih razlogov.
The communication of the contracting authority's decision to each tenderer or candidate shall be accompanied by a summary of the relevant reasons.
V primeru zahtevka za revizijo v zvezi z odločitvami iz člena [38b](1)(b) te direktive, ki niso predmet posebnega obvestila, znaša rok vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od objave zadevne odločitve.
In the case of an application for review concerning decisions referred to in Article [38b](1)(b) that are not subject to a specific notification requirement, the time period shall be at least 10 days from the date of publication of the decision in question.
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 2c direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 2c of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Z vključitvijo revizijskega postopka v to direktivo bi dosegli pravo odprtost trga, zagotovili učinkovito pravno varstvo za zadevne ponudnike ter preglednost in nediskriminacijo pri oddaji naročil brez poseganja v potrebo držav članic, da varujejo zaupne informacije.
The inclusion of a review procedure in this Directive is intended to achieve genuine market opening, provide effective legal protection for tenderers and ensure transparency and non-discrimination in the award of contracts without prejudice to Member States' need to protect secret information .
Člen 38 f (novo)
Article 38 f (new)
Člen 38f
Article 38f
Države članice zagotovijo, da naročilo za neveljavno razglasi revizijski organ, neodvisen od naročnika, oziroma da je neveljavnost naročila rezultat odločitve takšnega revizijskega organa v naslednjih primerih:
Member States shall ensure that a contract is considered ineffective by a review body independent of the contracting authority or that its ineffectiveness is the result of a decision of such a review body in any of the following cases:
(a) če je naročnik oddal naročilo brez predhodne objave obvestila o naročilu v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, kadar to ni dovoljeno v skladu s to direktivo,
(a) if the contracting authority has awarded a contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union without this being permissible in accordance with this Directive;
(b) ko gre za kršitev člena [38a](5), člena [38b](3) ali člena [38c](2), če zaradi te kršitve ponudnik, ki je zaprosil za revizijo, ni imel možnosti uporabiti predpogodbenih pravnih sredstev in je navedena kršitev združena z neko drugo kršitvijo te direktive, če je ta kršitev vplivala na možnost ponudnika, ki je zaprosil za revizijo, da pridobi javno naročilo,
(b) in case of an infringement of Article [38a](5), Article [38b](3) or Article [38c](2), if this infringement has deprived the tenderer applying for review of the possibility to pursue pre - contractual remedies where such an infringement is combined with another infringement of this Directive, if that infringement has affected the chances of the tenderer applying for a review to obtain the contract;
(c) v primerih iz drugega pododstavka člena [38d](c), če so države članice uporabile odstopanje od obdobja mirovanja za naročila, ki temeljijo na okvirnem sporazumu.
(c) in the cases referred to in the second subparagraph of Article [38d](c), if Member States have invoked the derogation from the standstill period for contracts based on a framework agreement.
Posledice, ki izhajajo iz dejstva, da se naročilo šteje za neveljavno, se določijo v nacionalnem pravu.
The consequences of a contract being considered ineffective shall be provided for by national law.
Z nacionalno zakonodajo se lahko razveljavijo vse pogodbene obveznosti z veljavnostjo za nazaj ali pa se omeji obseg razveljavitve na tiste obveznosti, ki bi jih bilo treba še izpolniti.
National law may provide for the retroactive cancellation of all contractual obligations or limit the scope of the cancellation to those obligations which still have to be performed.
V slednjem primeru predvidijo države članice uporabo alternativnih kazni v smislu člena [38g](2).
In the latter case, Member States shall provide for the application of alternative penalties within the meaning of Article [38g](2).
Države članice lahko določijo, da revizijski organ, neodvisen od naročnika, na podlagi utemeljitev, navedenih v odstavku 1, naročila ne šteje za neveljavno, čeprav je bilo oddano nezakonito, če revizijski organ po preučitvi vseh zadevnih vidikov ugotovi, da je zaradi utemeljenih bistvenih varnostnih interesov zadevne države članice treba ohraniti veljavnost pogodbe.
Member States may provide that the review body independent of the contracting authority may not consider a contract ineffective, even though it has been awarded illegally on the grounds mentioned in paragraph 1, if the review body finds, after having examined all relevant aspects, that justified essential security interests of the Member State concerned require that the validity of the contract should be maintained.
V tem primeru predvidijo države članice alternativne kazni v smislu člena [38g](2), ki se bodo uporabile namesto tega.
In this case, Member States shall provide for alternative penalties within the meaning of Article [38g](2), which shall be applied instead.
Gospodarski interesi v zvezi z veljavnostjo naročila se lahko upoštevajo le kot bistveni varnostni interesi, če bi v izjemnih okoliščinah neveljavnost povzročila nesorazmerne posledice.
Economic interests in the effectiveness of a contract may only be considered as essential security interests if in exceptional circumstances ineffectiveness would lead to disproportionate consequences.
Vendar pa gospodarski interesi, neposredno povezani z zadevnim naročilom, ne smejo predstavljati bistvenih varnostnih interesov.
However, economic interests directly linked to the contract concerned shall not constitute essential security interests .
Gospodarski interesi, neposredno povezani z javnim naročilom, med drugim zajemajo stroške, ki nastanejo zaradi zamud pri izvajanju javnega naročila, stroške, ki nastanejo zaradi izvajanja novega postopka za oddajo javnega naročila, stroške, ki nastanejo zaradi zamenjave gospodarskega subjekta, ki izvaja javno naročilo, in stroške pravnih obveznosti, ki nastanejo zaradi neveljavnosti.
Economic interests directly linked to the contract include, inter alia, the costs resulting from the delay in the execution of the contract, the costs resulting from the launching of a new procurement procedure, the costs resulting from the change of the economic operator performing the contract and the costs of legal obligations resulting from the ineffectiveness.
Države članice določijo, da se odstavek 1(a), ne uporablja, ko:
Member States shall provide that paragraph 1 ( a ) does not apply where :
– naročnik meni, da je oddaja naročila brez predhodne objave obvestila o naročilu v Uradnem listu Evropske unije dopustna v skladu s to direktivo,
– the contracting authority considers that the award of a contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union is permissible in accordance with this Directive,
– naročnik v skladu s členom [38j] v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavi obvestilo, ki izraža njegovo namero o sklenitvi pogodbe, in
– the contracting authority has published in the Official Journal of the European Union a notice as described in Article [38j] expressing its intention to conclude the contract, and
– pogodba ni bila sklenjena, preden je poteklo vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu objave tega obvestila.
– the contract has not been concluded before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the publication of this notice.
Države članice določijo, da se odstavek 1(c), ne uporablja, ko:
Member States shall provide that paragraph 1 ( c ) does not apply where :
– naročnik meni, da je oddaja javnega naročila v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 21(4),
– the contracting authority considers that the award of a contract is in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 21(4),
– je naročnik zadevnim ponudnikom poslal odločitev o oddaji javnega naročila skupaj s povzetkom zadevnih razlogov iz člena 26(2) ob upoštevanju člena 26(3) in
– the contracting authority has sent a contract award decision, together with a summary of the relevant reasons as referred to in Article 26( 2 ) , subject to Article 26(3) , to the tenderers concerned , and
– pogodba ni bila sklenjena pred potekom vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko se zadevnim ponudnikom po telefaksu ali elektronsko pošlje odločitev o oddaji naročila, oziroma – če se uporabijo druga komunikacijska sredstva – pred potekom roka vsaj 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko se zadevnim ponudnikom pošlje odločitev o oddaji naročila, ali vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema odločitve o oddaji naročila.
– the contract has not been concluded before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers concerned if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of a period of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers concerned or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of the contract award decision.
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 2d direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 2d of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Člen 38 g (novo)
Article 38 g (new)
Člen 38g
Article 38g
Kršitve te direktive in alternativne kazni
Infringements of this Directive and alternative penalties
Države članice se v primeru kršitev člena [38a](5), člena [38b](3) ali člena [38c](2), ki niso zajete v členu [38f](1)(b), odločijo za neveljavnost v skladu s členom [38f](1), (2) in (3) ali pa predvidijo alternativne kazni.
In the case of an infringement of Article [38a](5), Article [38b](3) or Article [38c](2) which is not covered by Article [38f](1)(b), Member States shall provide for ineffectiveness in accordance with Article [38f](1) , (2) and (3), or for alternative penalties.
Države članice lahko določijo, da revizijski organ, neodvisen od naročnika, po preučitvi vseh zadevnih vidikov odloči, ali naj se naročilo opredeli kot neveljavno oziroma ali bi bilo treba naložiti alternativne kazni.
Member States may provide that the review body independent of the contracting authority shall decide, after having assessed all relevant aspects, whether the contract should be considered ineffective or whether alternative penalties should be imposed.
Alternativne kazni morajo biti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne.
Alternative penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Alternativne kazni so:
They shall comprise the following :
– odreditev globe za naročnika; ali
- the imposition of fines on the contracting authority; or
– skrajšanje trajanja naročila.
- the shortening of the duration of the contract.
Države članice lahko revizijskemu organu podelijo široke diskrecijske pravice, da bi upošteval vse bistvene dejavnike, vključno z resnostjo kršitve, vedenjem naročnika, v primerih iz člena [38f](2) pa tudi, v kolikšni meri določena pogodba ostaja v veljavi.
Member States may confer on the review body broad discretion to take into account all the relevant factors, including the seriousness of the infringement, the behaviour of the contracting authority and, in the cases referred to in Article [38f](2), the extent to which the contract remains in force.
Dodelitev nadomestila za škodo ne pomeni ustrezne kazni za namene tega odstavka.
The award of damages does not constitute an approp ria te penalty for the purposes of this paragraph.
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 2e direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 2e of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Člen 38 h (novo)
Article 38 h (new)
Člen 38h
Article 38h