natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija do …* predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o uporabljanju te uredbe s poudarkom na zahtevah za imena novih tekstilnih vlaken in sprejetju teh imen ter po potrebi vloži zakonodajni predlog .
By …*, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation, with an emphasis on the requests for and adoption of new textile fibre names and submit, where appropriate , a legislative proposal.
* Pet let od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* Five years after the entry into force of this Regulation
* Tri leta od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* 3 years after the entry into force of this Regulation
Komisija do ...* Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o morebitnih novih zahtevah o označevanju, ki bodo uvedene na ravni Unije, da se potrošnikom zagotovijo točne, ustrezne, razumljive in primerljive informacije o lastnostih tekstilnih izdelkov.
By ...*, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council regarding possible new labelling requirements to be introduced at Union level with a view to providing consumers with accurate, relevant, intelligible and comparable information on the characteristics of textile products.
Poročilo temelji na širokem posvetovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, potrošniških raziskavah in podrobni analizi stroškovne učinkovitosti, ter upošteva veljavne evropske in mednarodne standarde na tem področju.
The report shall be based on an extended consultation of all stakeholders, consumer surveys, a thorough cost-benefit analysis, and shall take into account existing related European and international standards.
Poročilo, ki so mu po potrebi priloženi zakonodajni predlogi, med drugim obravnava:
The report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by legislative proposals, and shall examine, inter alia, the following issues:
– sistem usklajenega označevanja za vzdrževanje,
- a harmonised care labelling system,
– vseevropski sistem enotnega označevanja velikosti za oblačila na podlagi telesnih mer;
- an EU-wide uniform size labelling system for clothing based on body measurements,
– vseevropski sistem enotnega označevanja velikosti za oblačila in obutev;
- an EU-wide uniform size labelling system for footwear,
– navedbo vseh morebitno alergenih ali nevarnih snovi, ki so bile uporabljene med proizvodnjo ali predelavo tekstilnega izdelka,
- indication of any potentially allergenic or hazardous substances used in the manufacture or processing of textile products,
– ekološke oznake v zvezi s prijaznostjo okolju in trajnostno proizvodnjo tekstilnih izdelkov,
- ecological labelling relating to the environmental performance and sustainable production of textile products,
– oznake socialne pravičnosti, da bi potrošnike obveščali o socialnih okoliščinah, v katerih je bil izdelek proizveden,
- social labelling to inform consumers about the social conditions under which a textile product was produced,
– elektronsko označevanje, vključno z radiofrekvenčnimi identifikacijami (RFID),
- electronic labelling, including Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID),
– vključitev identifikacijske številke na etiketi, ki se uporablja za pridobitev dodatnih informacij na zahtevo o izdelku in proizvajalcu, na primer na internetu,
- the inclusion of an identification number on the label which shall be used to obtain additional on-demand information, for instance via the Internet, about the product and the manufacturer,
– uporabo nejezikovnih znakov ali šifer za določitev vlaken, ki jih vsebuje tekstilni izdelek, na podlagi katerih potrošniki preprosto prepoznajo sestavo in zlasti, ali so bila uporabljena naravna ali sintetična vlakna.
- the use of language-independent symbols or codes for identifying the fibres comprised in a textile product, enabling the consumer to easily understand its composition and, in particular, the use of natural or synthetic fibres.
*18 mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
* 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Študija o nevarnih snoveh
Study on hazardous substances
V okviru te študije se zlasti preuči, ali obstaja vzročna zveza med alergičnimi reakcijami in vlakni, barvami, biocidi, konzervansi ali nanodelci, uporabljenimi v tekstilnih izdelkih.
That study shall evaluate in particular whether there is a causal link between allergic reactions and fibres, colourings, biocides, preservatives or nanoparticles used in textile products.
Študija temelji na znanstvenih dokazih in upošteva rezultate dejavnosti tržnega nadzora.
The study shall be based on scientific evidence and shall take into account the results of market surveillance activities.
Komisija na podlagi te študije, če je to utemeljeno, predloži zakonodajne predloge o prepovedi ali omejitvi uporabe morebitno nevarnih snovi, uporabljenih v tekstilnih izdelkih, v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Unije.
On the basis of the study, the Commission shall, where justified, present legislative proposals with a view to prohibiting or restricting the use of potentially hazardous substances used in textile products, in compliance with relevant Union legislation.
Tekstilni izdelki, ki so skladni z Direktivo 2008/121/ES in so bili dani na trg pred …* so lahko dostopni na trgu še do ... **.
Textile products which are in accordance with Directive 2008/121/EC and which are placed on the market before …* may continue to be made available on the market until …**.
Tekstilni izdelki, ki so v skladu z Direktivo 2008/121/ES in so bili dani na trg pred …* so lahko dostopni na trgu še do ... **.
Textile products which comply with Directive 2008/121/EC and which are placed on the market before...* may continue to be made available on the market until …**
*6 mesecev po datumu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* 6 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation
**2 leti po datumu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
** 2 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation
**Dve leti in 6 mesecev po datumu začetka uporabe te uredbe.
** 2 years and 6 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation
Ta prehodna določba bo zagotovila, da lahko tekstilni izdelki, ki so na trgu v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo, na trgu ostanejo še dve leti in pol po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
This transitional provision will ensure that textile products which are placed on the market in accordance with current legislation may continue to be made available on the market for another two and a half years following the entry into force of the Regulation.
Tako nove zahteve glede označevanja iz te uredbe ne bodo povzročile dodatnih obremenitev zaradi ponovnega označevanja tekstilnih izdelkov, ki so v skladu s sedanjo zakonodajo.
With this provision, the new labelling requirements set out in this Regulation should not result in a burdensome re-labelling of textile products that comply with current legislation.
Stališče Sveta
Council position1
Priloga II – točka 5 a (novo)
Annex II – point 5 a (new)
(5a) Razpoložljivi znanstveni podatki o morebitnih alergičnih reakcijah ali drugih škodljivih učinkih novih vlaken na zdravje ljudi, tudi rezultati preizkusov, izvedenih v ta namen v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo EU;
(5a) Available scientific information concerning possible allergenic reactions or other adverse effects of the new textile fibre on human health, including results of tests conducted to that effect in compliance with relevant Union legislation;
Tehnična dokumentacija, ki se priloži vlogi za vključitev imena novega tekstilnega vlakna na seznam iz Priloge I, po potrebi vsebuje informacije o možnih vplivih novega vlakna na zdravje.
The technical file to be attached to the application for the inclusion of a new textile fibre name into the list set out in Annex I should contain, where appropriate, information about potential health implications of the new fibre.
Priloga V – točka 13
Annex V – point 13
Priloga V – točka 17
Annex V – point 17
Komisija je 30. januarja 2009 sprejela sedanji predlog uredbe o tekstilnih imenih in s tem povezanim označevanjem tekstilnih izdelkov.
The Commission adopted on 30 January 2009 the current proposal for a regulation on textile names and related labelling of textile products.
Cilj predloga je poenostaviti in izboljšati obstoječi regulativni okvir za označevanje tekstilnih izdelkov, da bi spodbudili razvoj in tržno uvajanje novih vlaken.
The aim of the proposal is to simplify and improve the existing regulatory framework for the labelling of textile products with a view to encouraging the development and uptake of new fibres.
S predlogom se poenostavi postopek za prilagoditev zakonodaje tehničnemu napredku, in sicer s preoblikovanjem obstoječih treh direktiv
The proposal facilitates the process to adapt legislation to technical progress by transforming the three existing Directives
Direktivi 96/73/ES in 73/44/EGS opredeljujeta, katere metode analize se uporabljajo za preverjanje, ali je sestava tekstilnih izdelkov skladna navedbi na oznaki. v eno samo uredbo, s čimer se bo mogoče izogniti prenosu povsem tehničnih posodobitev, ter skrajša čas med vložitvijo vloge in sprejetjem imena novega vlakna.
Directives 96/73/EC and 73/44/EEC specify the methods of analysis to be used to check whether the composition of textile products is in conformity with the information supplied on the label. into a single Regulation, which would avoid transposition of merely technical updates, and shortens the time between the submission of an application and the adoption of a new fibre name.
Parlament je pozdravil predlog Komisije, saj poenostavlja veljavni ureditveni okvir ter bi lahko spodbudil inovacije v tekstilnem sektorju in sektorju oblačil, hkrati pa uporabnikom vlaken in potrošnikom omogočil hitrejše izkoriščanje prednosti inovativnih izdelkov.
Parliament welcomed the Commission's proposal as it simplifies the existing regulatory framework and has the potential to encourage innovation in the textile and clothing sector, whilst allowing fibre users and consumers to benefit more readily from innovative products.
V svojem stališču med prvo obravnavo, sprejetem 18. maja 2010, je Evropski parlament z zelo veliko večino odobril 63 predlogov sprememb.
In its position at first reading, adopted on 18 May 2010, the European Parliament approved, with a very large majority, 63 amendments.
Spremembe so bile po večini tehnične narave, da bi uskladili besedilo s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije in novim zakonodajnim okvirom za trženje blaga.
The vast majority were technical amendments aimed at aligning the text with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and with the new legislative framework for the marketing of goods.
Parlament je sprejel tudi nekaj pomembnih sprememb, vključno s pravili za označevanje porekla, navedbo vsebnosti materialov živalskega izvora, uporabo nejezikovnih znakov in klavzulo o pregledu.
Parliament adopted also a number of substantive amendments, including rules on origin marking, indication of animal-derived materials, use of language-independent symbols and a review clause.
Stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi
Council's position at first reading
V svojem stališču je Svet sprejel, ali vsaj delno vsebinsko sprejel, veliko število tehničnih predlogov sprememb (skupaj 40), ki jih je uvedel tudi Parlament, vendar pa je zavrnil vse pomembne spremembe, ki jih je predlagal Parlament.
In its position, the Council accepted, or partly accepted in substance, a large number of technical amendments (40 in total) introduced also by Parliament, but rejected all substantive amendments proposed by Parliament.
Svet je menil, da uvedba novih zahtev ne bi bila združljiva s ciljem poenostavitve iz izvornega predloga.
The Council considered that introducing new requirements would not be compatible with the simplification objective of the original proposal.
Spremembe, ki jih je predlagal poročevalec za drugo obravnavo
Amendments proposed by the Rapporteur for the second reading
Pri preučitvi stališča Sveta je vaš poročevalec sklenil ohraniti veliko večino predlogov sprememb Parlamenta iz prve obravnave, v omejenem številu primerov pa je preoblikoval nekaj predlogov sprememb zaradi jasnosti.
In his examination of the Council’s position, your Rapporteur has decided to restore the vast majority of Parliament's amendments at first reading, while in a limited number of cases he has reworded some amendments for the sake of clarity.
Dodano je bilo tudi nekaj uvodnih izjav, ki ustrezajo določbam, ki jih je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi.
Some recitals corresponding to provisions adopted by Parliament at first reading have been also added.
Pomembnejše spremembe, ki jih je ponovno predložil Parlament zajemajo:
The main amendments reintroduced by the Rapporteur cover the following issues:
(a) Oznako porekla
( a) Origin marking
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o navedbi države porekla za določene izdelke, uvožene iz tretjih držav ( KOM(2005)0661 ) , ki zajema številne kategorije blaga, tudi tekstilne izdelke.
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from third countries ( COM(2005)0661 ) which covers several categories of goods, including textile products.
Kljub široki podpori Parlamenta za ta predlog v Svetu ni bilo doseženega opaznega napredka.
Despite Parliament’s vast support for this proposal, no significant progress has been made in the Council.
Vaš poročevalec upa, da bi lahko bila zakonodaja za posamezni sektor, ki bi zajemala samo tekstilne izdelke, kot je predlagal Parlament v tej uredbi o označevanju tekstila, izkazala za uspešnejšo pri doseganju dogovora med sozakonodajalcema.
Your Rapporteur hopes that a sector-based legislation, covering only textile products, as proposed by Parliament in this regulation on textile labelling, could prove to be more successful in reaching an agreement between the two co-legislators.
Vaš poročevalec želi poudariti, da je zaradi sedanjega pomanjkanja usklajenih pravil o oznaki porekla EU v slabšem položaju v primerjavi z glavnimi trgovinskimi partnerji, na primer s Kanado, Kitajsko, Japonsko in ZDA, ki zahtevajo oznako porekla za uvoženo blago.
Your Rapporteur wishes to highlight that the current absence of harmonised rules on origin marking puts the EU at a disadvantage vis-à-vis its main trade partners, such as Canada, China, Japan, and the USA, who require origin marking for imported goods.
Zaradi tega so tudi evropski proizvajalci potrošniškega blaga občutljivega porekla prikrajšani, da bi imeli koristi, povezane s proizvodnjo v Uniji, potrošniki pa nimajo priložnosti, da bi dostopali do informacij o izvoru proizvodov.
It also deprives European producers of origin-sensitive consumer goods of reaping the benefits associated with producing within the Union, while consumers miss the opportunity to have access to information on the origin of products.
Oznaka porekla bi potrošniku omogočila lažjo izbiro in prispevala k zmanjšanju goljufivih, netočnih ali zavajajočih trditev o poreklu.
Origin marking would facilitate consumer choice and contribute to reducing fraudulent, inaccurate or misleading claims of origin.
Nadalje poročevalec ponovno uvaja predlog spremembe Parlamenta v zvezi s prostovoljno shemo označevanja porekla, ki naj bi veljala za tekstilne izdelke, proizvedene v EU.
Furthermore, the Rapporteur reintroduces Parliament’s amendment concerning a voluntary origin marking scheme to be applied to EU manufactured textile products.
Za izdelek velja, da je po poreklu iz države, v kateri je šel skozi vsaj dve od proizvodnih faz: predenje, tkanje, zaključna dela in izdelavo.
The product shall be deemed to originate in the country where it underwent at least two of its stages of manufacture: spinning, weaving, finishing, making-up.
(b) Netekstilni deli živalskega izvora
( b) Non-textile parts of animal origin
Ta predlog spremembe uvaja zahtevo po navedbi prisotnosti netekstilnih delov živalskega izvora v tekstilnih izdelkih.
This amendment introduces a requirement to indicate the presence of non-textile parts of animal origin in textile products.
Natančne načine izvedbe bi morala opredeliti Komisija v obliki delegiranih aktov.
The precise modalities of implementation should be defined by the Commission in the form of delegated acts.
Treba je poudariti, da se krzno pogosto uporablja za obrobe pri relativno dragih oblačilih, ki so velikokrat uvožena iz Azije.
It should be highlighted that fur is often used as trimming in relatively inexpensive garments, which are often imported from Asia.
Pogosto potrošniki težko razlikujejo med pravim krznom in umetnim krznom dobre kakovosti.
It is often very difficult for consumers to distinguish between real and good quality fake fur.
Proizvajalci pravo krzno pogosto barvajo in obrezujejo, tako da nestrokovnjak težje opazi, da je res pravo.
Manufacturers also frequently dye and trim real fur, which makes it less obvious to the untrained eye that it is genuine.
Potrošniki predvidevajo tudi, da bo pravo krzno samodejno navedeno na etiketi oblačila kot njegov sestavni del.
Consumers also presume that real fur will automatically be listed on the garment’s label as one of its constituent parts.
Tako predvidevanje je povsem smotrno, glede na to, da je treba ime in odstotek tekstilnih vlaken obvezno navesti.
This assumption is far from unreasonable given that the names and percentages of textile fibres are mandatorily indicated.
Posledično potrošniki tvegajo, da nezavedno kupijo izdelke iz pravega krzna, čeprav tega raje ne bi storili.
Consequently, consumers run the risk of inadvertently purchasing real fur products when they would in fact prefer not to do so.
Obstaja že zakonodaja EU (Direktiva 94/11/ES), ki zadeva označevanje materialov (usnja), ki se uporabljajo kot del obutve.
There is already EU legislation (Directive 94/11/EC) in place concerning the labelling of materials (leather) used as components in footwear.
Ta zakonodaja je bila uvedena, da bi pomagala potrošnikom do obveščene izbire, zaščitila industrijo in okrepila delovanje notranjega trga.
This legislation was introduced to help consumers make informed choices, protect the industry and enhance the operation of the internal market.
Sedanji predlog spremembe o materialih živalskega izvora sledi logiki zakonodaje EU.
The current amendment on animal-derived materials follows the logic of this EU legislation.
Obstoječi prostovoljni in samoregulativni ukrepi za označevanje krznenih izdelkov so se izkazali za nezadostne.
Existing voluntary and self-regulatory measures for labelling fur products have proved insufficient.
Mednarodna federacija za trgovanje s krznom sedaj na primer uporablja sistem označevanja "zagotovljeno poreklo", ki naj bi potrošnikom zagotovil informacije o izvoru krzna, ki ga kupujejo.
The International Fur Trade Federation, for example, currently operates an ‘Origin Assured’ labelling system, which is purported to provide consumers with information on the provenance of the fur they are buying.
Vendar tako prostovoljno označevanje zajema samo zelo majhen delež pomembnega modnega trga s krznom, kjer lahko sklepamo, da se potrošnik ni skušal izogniti nakupu krznenih izdelkov, temveč se je zanj zavestno odločil.
Such voluntary labelling, however, only covers a very small proportion of the ‘higher end’ of the fur fashion market where one can presume that the consumer has already made a conscious decision to purchase fur products, rather than to avoid them.
Končno je lahko krzno tudi škodljivo za zdravje tistih, ki so alergični na živalsko krzno/dlako.
Finally, fur can also be a potential health hazard for those suffering from allergies to animal fur/hair.
Obvezno označevanje bi torej potrošnikom zagotovilo sredstva za prepoznavanje izdelkov, ki bi utegnili škodovati njihovemu zdravju.
Mandatory fur labelling would thus provide consumers with the means of identifying products that may be damaging to their health.
(c) Klavzule o pregledu
( c) Review clause
Komisija bi morala zato Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti poročilo o morebitnih novih zahtevah za označevanje, ki naj bi se uvedle na ravni Unije.
To that end, the Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council regarding possible new labelling requirements to be introduced at Union level.
Poročilo mora temeljiti na širokem posvetovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, potrošniških raziskavah in podrobni analizi stroškovne učinkovitosti, po potrebi pa morajo biti priloženi tudi zakonodajni predlogi.
The report should be based on an extended consultation of all stakeholders, consumer surveys and a thorough cost/benefit analysis and should be accompanied, where appropriate, by legislative proposals.
V zvezi s tem je treba zagotoviti, da razširjeno obvezno označevanje ne bo nesorazmerno obremenilo podjetij, če ne bo imelo dejanske dodane vrednosti za potrošnike, ki jih preobsežne informacije na etiketah tekstilnih izdelkov lahko celo zmedejo.
In this context, it should be ensured that extending compulsory labelling will not impose a disproportionate burden on enterprises without bringing real added-value for consumers, who may even be confused by an excess of information on the label of textile products.
V ta namen bi lahko razen obveznih zahtev o označevanju preučili druge možnosti, da bi potrošnikom omogočili ozaveščeno izbiro.
For that purpose, alternative means other than mandatory labelling requirements could be investigated for consumers to make informed choices.
(d) Študija o nevarnih snoveh
( d) Study on hazardous substances
Poročevalec meni, da ni dovolj dokazov o možnih posledicah nevarnih snovi, uporabljenih v proizvodnji in predelavi tekstilnih izdelkov.
The Rapporteur considers that there is a lack of sufficient evidence on the possible effects of hazardous substances used in the manufacture and processing of textile products.
Komisija zato izvede študijo, da bi ocenila, ali so lahko take snovi nevarne za zdravje ljudi.
The Commission shall therefore carry out a study to assess whether such substances may represent a hazard to human health.
(e) Nejezikovni znaki ali šifre za vlakna
( e) Language-independent symbols or codes for fibres
Po potrebi bi lahko imena tekstilnih vlaken zamenjali ali dopolnili z razumljivimi nejezikovnimi znaki ali šiframi.
Where appropriate, textile fibre names should be replaced by, or combined with, intelligible language-independent symbols or codes to avoid translation of fibre names in several EU languages.
Predlagani sistem simbolov ali šifer razvije in izvaja Komisija z delegiranimi akti.
The proposed symbol or code system is to be developed and implemented by the Commission by means of delegated acts.
(f) Zahteve za predložitev tehnične dokumentacije k vlogi za odobritev imena novih tekstilnih vlaken (Priloga II)
( f) Requirements for the technical file to be attached to the application for the authorisation of a new textile fibre name (Annex II)
Tehnična dokumentacija, priložena vlogi za vključitev imena novega tekstilnega vlakna v Prilogo I bi morala vsebovati razpoložljive znanstvene podatke o morebitnih alergičnih reakcijah ali drugih škodljivih učinkih novih vlaken na zdravje ljudi, tudi rezultate preizkusov, izvedenih v ta namen, v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo EU.
The technical file accompanying the application to add a new textile fibre name to Annex I should contain available scientific information concerning possible allergenic reactions or other adverse effects of the new fibre on human health, including results of tests conducted to that effect in compliance with relevant EU legislation.
(g) Tekstilni izdelki iz več vrst vlaken
( g) Multi-fibre textile products
Potrošniki morajo biti obveščeni o celotni sestavi tekstilnega izdelka v odstotkih.
Consumers should be informed about the full percentage composition of a textile product.