natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Najpozneje leta 2012 Komisija pregleda ustreznost razširitve podroèja uporabe Direktiva na izdelke, ki niso povezani z energijo , uèinkovitost te direktive in njenih izvedbenih ukrepov, prag za izvedbene ukrepe, mehanizme tržnega nadzora in morebitne povezane spodbujene samoregulativne mehanizme, po posvetovanju s posvetovalnim forumom iz èlena 18, ter po potrebi predstavila predloge za spremembe te direktive Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Not later than 2012 the Commission shall review the appropriateness of extending the scope of the Directive to non energy related products, the effectiveness of this Directive and of its implementing measures, the threshold for implementing measures, market surveillance mechanisms and any relevant self-regulation stimulated, after consultation of the Consultation Forum referred to in Article 18, and, as appropriate, present proposals to the European Parliament and the Council for amending this Directive.
Najpozneje 1. januarja 2012 Komisija pregleda uèinkovitost te direktive in njenih izvedbenih ukrepov, prag za izvedbene ukrepe, mehanizme tržnega nadzora in morebitne povezane spodbujene samoregulativne mehanizme, po posvetovanju s posvetovalnim forumom iz èlena 18, ter po potrebi predstavi predloge za spremembe te direktive Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu , da bi tako :
Not later than 1 January 2012 the Commission shall review the effectiveness of this Directive and of its implementing measures, the threshold for implementing measures, market surveillance mechanisms and any relevant self-regulation stimulated, after consultation of the Consultation Forum referred to in Article 18, and, as appropriate, present proposals to the European Parliament and the Council for amending this Directive in order to:
– razširila področje uporabe te direktive na izdelke, ki niso povezani z energijo in imajo velik potencial za zmanjšanje vpliva na okolje v svojem celotnem življenjskem ciklusu in za doseganje učinkovitosti virov in materiala prek boljše zasnove;
- extend the scope of this Directive to non-energy related products with significant improvement potential for reducing environmental impacts throughout their whole life-cycle and achieving resource and material efficiency through better design;
– na podlagi praga za vpliv na okolje vključila izdelke z obsegom prodaje in trgovanja znotraj Skupnosti manj kot 200.000 enot na leto.
- include products with a volume of sales and trade within the Community of less than 200 000 units a year, based on an environmental impact threshold.
Najpozneje leta 2010 Komisija predstavi seznam prednostnih izdelkov, za katere bi bila na podlagi njihovega sedanjega vpliva na okolje in pričakovanih prihodnjih koristi potrebna ureditev pred 2012.
Not later than 2010 the Commission shall present a list of priority products that, if necessary, have to be regulated before 2012, based on their current environmental impact and expected future benefits.
Prednostno je treba obravnavati zlasti izdelke, ki pri proizvodnji in uporabi vplivajo na porabo energije in drugih virov.
In particular, priority shall be given to products with an impact on energy and other resource consumption in both production and use.
Določiti je treba jasen časovni razpored, v skladu s katerim bo Komisija do leta 2012 pregledala Direktivo, da bi ta zajela vse izdelke in ne bi ostali zgolj pri ocenjevanju „primernosti razširitve na izdelke, ki niso povezani z energijo“.
It is necessary to clearly set a timetable when the Commission shall review the Directive in order to cover all products and not only leave it to an assessment of the "appropriateness of extension to non-energy related products" by 2012.
Poleg tega mora prenovitev leta 2012 zajeti tudi izdelke z obsegom prodaje in trgovanja manj kot 200.000 enot, ob upoštevanju življenjske dobe izdelkov ter njihovega vpliva na okolje. .
In addition, the recast in 2012 must cover as well such products with a volume of less than 200.000 units taking into account the lifespan of the product and its environmental impact.
Priloga I – del 1 – točka 1.3 – točka d
Annex I – Part 1 – point 1.3 – point d
(d) uporaba snovi, razvrščenih kot nevarne za zdravje in/ali okolje v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 67/548/EGS z dne 27. junija 1967 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov v zvezi z razvrščanjem, pakiranjem in označevanjem nevarnih snovi, in ob upoštevanju zakonodaje o trženju in uporabi določenih snovi, na primer direktiv 76/769/EGS ali 2002/95/ES;
(d) use of substances classified as hazardous to health and/or the environment according to Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packing and labelling of dangerous substances and taking into account legislation on the marketing and use of specific substances, such as Directives 76/769/EEC or 2002/95/EC;
Obvladovanje tveganj zaradi kemikalij je ustrezno urejeno z določbam REACH (Uredba 1907/2006/ES).
The risk management of chemicals is adequately managed under the provisions of REACH (Regulation 1907/2006/EC).
Uredba REACH je najcelovitejši in najzahtevnejši instrument politike s področja kemikalij na svetu.
The REACH Regulation is the most comprehensive and demanding chemicals policy instrument in the world.
Glavni cilj te uredbe je izboljšati varovanje zdravja ljudi in okolja pred nevarnostmi, povezanimi s kemikalijami.
The primary aim of the Regulation is to improve the protection of human health and the environment from the risks that can be posed by hazards associated with chemicals.
Treba se je torej izogniti ukrepom iz predloga o okoljsko primerni zasnovi izdelkov, ki podvajajo določbe REACH, ki niso skladni s temi določbami ali so v nasprotju z njimi.
Measures within the Eco-Design proposal that duplicate, are inconsistent with, or contradict the provisions of REACH must therefore be avoided.
Pilar Ayuso, Juan Fraile Cantón, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Edit Herczog, Vittorio Prodi, Esko Seppänen, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Uručev
Pilar Ayuso, Juan Fraile Cantón, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Edit Herczog, Vittorio Prodi, Esko Seppänen, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Urutchev
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav (prenovitev), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (recast)
Predsednica delegacije:
Delegation chair:
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3719/2008 – C6-0042/2009 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3719/2008 – C6‑0042/2009 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0447 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0447 . on the Council common position
UL C 184 E, 22.07.2008, str.
OJ C 184 E, 22.7.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2008)0828 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2008)0828 )
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6-0097/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0097/2009 ),
I.1 Tretji pomorski paket
I.1 The 3rd Maritime Package
Komisija je tretji pomorski paket (znan tudi kot paket Erika III) predlagala konec leta 2005.
The 3rd Maritime Package (also known as Erika III Package) was proposed by the Commission at the end of 2005.
Končni cilj tretjega pomorskega paketa je okrepiti obstoječe varnostne predpise EU in v zakonodajo Skupnosti prenesti osrednje mednarodne instrumente.
The overall aim of the 3rd Maritime Package is to further reinforce existing EU safety legislation and to transpose major international instruments into Community law.
S sedmimi predlogi, ki ga sestavljajo, naj bi preprečili nesreče (zaradi večje kakovosti evropskih zastav, revizije predpisov o pomorski inšpekciji in spremljanju ladijskega prometa ter boljših pravil za klasifikacijske zavode) in omogočili učinkovit odziv v primeru nesreče (z usklajenim okvirom za preiskavo nesreč, novimi pravili o odškodninah za potnike v primeru nesreče in novimi pravili o odgovornosti lastnikov ladij in obveznem zavarovanju).
Its seven proposals aim at preventing accidents (by improving the quality of European flags, reviewing the legislation on port state control and vessel traffic monitoring and by improving the rules relating to classification societies) and ensuring an effective response in case of an accident (by developing a harmonised framework for accident investigation, introducing rules on compensation of passengers in case of an accident and by introducing rules on ship-owners' liability coupled with a mandatory insurance scheme).
I.2 Pričujoči predlog
I.2 This proposal
Cilj predloga Komisije je okrepiti skupne predpise in standarde za organizacije, pooblaščene za inšpekcijski pregled in nadzor ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav.
The aim of the Commission proposal was to reinforce common EU rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and related maritime administration’s ship activities.
Glavna naloga je bila revidirati zakonodajo EU, ki se je uporabila v Direktivi 94/57/ES, kar je pomenilo ureditev pristojnosti organizacij, ki so znane kot klasifikacijski zavodi, in ki izvajajo inšpekcijske preglede ladij ter jim izdajajo spričevala.
The main task was to revise existing EU legislation enshrined in Directive 94/57/EC, thereby regulating organisations, known as “classification societies”, which are currently responsible for inspecting ships and issuing their licenses.
Predlog Komisije krepi in pojasnjuje vlogo klasifikacijskih zavodov, priznanih v EU, saj so pri inšpekcijskih pregledih in izdajanju spričeval o varnosti plovil nastale pomanjkljivosti.
The Commission proposal strengthens and clarifies the role of classification societies recognised by the EU, as significant shortcomings were recognised in the process of inspecting and certifying the safety of vessels.
Pregledi ustreznih organov morajo zagotavljati odločno in povsem neodvisno delovanje organizacij, pristojnih za nadzor nad tem, ali ladje, ki plujejo po naših vodah, ustrezajo mednarodnim standardom s področja varnosti in preprečevanja onesnaževanja.
A close supervision by the appropriate authorities should guarantee that these organisations, which are tasked with ensuring that vessels on our seas comply with the relevant international safety and anti-pollution standards, act with independence and rigour.
II.1 Tretji pomorski paket v prvi in drugi obravnavi
II.1 The 3rd Maritime Package in 1st and 2nd reading
Za Parlament je pomorski paket vedno predstavljal celoto, zaradi česar je njegove posamezne dele vedno obravnaval skupaj.
For Parliament the Maritime Package was always seen as a package and for this reason its individual files were always dealt with together.
Prva obravnava vseh sedmih predlogov je potekala marca in aprila 2007.
The 1st reading on the seven proposals took place in March/April 2007.
Poskus deblokade obeh predlogov aprila 2008 je bil neuspešen.
An attempt in April 2008 to de-block the files was unsuccessful.
Države članice so skušale na Parlament izvajati pritisk, da bi se zakonodajni postopek nadaljeval za šest predlogov, za katere so posredovale skupna stališča.
Member States sought to exert pressure on the Parliament to continue the legislative procedure of the six by transmitting the common positions.
Nazadnje je Parlament na tak potek pristal, da obravnava ne bi v celoti obstala.
Parliament eventually agreed to this approach in order to make progress.
Po prejemu skupnih stališč junija 2008 je Parlament vendarle pritiskal na Svet, naj se posveti preostalima predlogoma (imenovanima „manjkajoča dva“).
Following the transmission of the common positions in June 2008 Parliament nevertheless continued to put pressure on Council to make progress with the two remaining files (known as the "missing two").
To je storil tako, da je bistvo obeh predlogov s predlogi sprememb vključil v nekatere aktivne zakonodajne predloge iz paketa.
This was done by incorporating the substance of these files into some of the active legislative files of the package via amendments.
Sočasno so se brez uspeha nadaljevala pogajanja o šestih predlogih v drugi obravnavi.
In parallel negotiations on the six files in 2nd reading continued unsuccessfully.
Usoda „manjkajočih dveh“, pa tudi težave pri nekaterih drugih predlogih so navedle na odločitev o tem, da v drugi obravnavi ne bo dogovora o nobenem predlogu.
The fate of the "missing two" as well as difficulties in some files led to a decision not to reach a second reading agreement on any file.
Parlament je na plenarnem zasedanju v vse predloge ponovno vnesel predloge sprememb iz prve obravnave, pa tudi predloge sprememb, s katerimi je bilo vneseno bistvo „manjkajočih dveh“.
In plenary Parliament restored its first reading amendments to all files, as well as the amendments which incorporated the substance of the "missing two".
Zaradi tega je o šestih predlogih stekel spravni postopek.
The six files subsequently went to conciliation.
Pričujoči predlog v prvi in drugi obravnavi
This proposal in 1st and 2nd reading
Parlament je pri obravnavi tega besedila sodeloval s Komisijo.
Parliament concurred with the Commission's approach on this file.
V prvi obravnavi je poskušal pojasniti in izboljšati predlog (na primer vlogo priznanih organizacij, ki delujejo v imenu držav, vzpostavitev ocenjevalnega odbora, ki bi ocenil kakovost upravljalnih sistemov priznanih organizacij).
In its 1st reading Parliament essentially sought to clarify and improve the proposal (e.g. role of recognised organisations acting on behalf of the States, setting up an Assessment Committee to assess the quality management systems of recognised organisations).
Svet je v svojem skupnem mnenju podprl mnenje Parlamenta iz prve obravnave, tudi pri drugi obravnavi ni bilo velikih odstopanj med institucijami.
The Council in its common position was favourable to Parliament's first reading position and no major issue divided the institutions in 2nd reading.
Največja sprememba, ki jo je uvedel Svet, je bila cepitev prvotnega predloga na ločena pravna instrumenta (direktivo in uredbo), kar sta Parlament in Komisija sprejela, saj se je pravna varnost s tem izboljšala.
The main change introduced by Council was a split of the original proposal in two separate legal instruments (a Directive and a Regulation), a move which was acceptable to Parliament and to the Commission, as it provides greater legal clarity.
III.1 Tretji pomorski paket v spravnem postopku
III.1 The 3rd Maritime Package in conciliation
Parlament in Svet sta se sešla na dveh tristranskih srečanjih (4. novembra in 2. decembra) in enem neformalnem srečanju ter o najtežjih predlogih razpravljala pred srečanjem spravnega odbora 8. decembra, s katerim so se pogajanja zaključila.
Parliament and Council held two trialogues (on 4.11. and 2.12.) and one informal meeting on the most difficult dossiers to run up to the conciliation committee on 8.12 which concluded the negotiations.
Poleg sestankov pogajalske skupine, v kateri so bili – zaradi obsega paketa – izjemoma tudi koordinatorji odbora TRAN, se je delegacija Parlamenta sešla dvakrat (5. novembra in 3. decembra).
Parliament's delegation met twice (5.11. and 3.12.) in addition to the meetings of the negotiating team which exceptionally included - because of the size of the package - the TRAN coordinators.
Tega večera je Parlament tudi predsedstvu izročil pisma, v katerih je potrdil svojo pripravljenost za dosego dogovora o „manjkajočih dveh“ v zgodnji fazi druge obravnave, kar bi Svetu omogočilo, da svoji skupni stališči sprejme na zasedanju 9. decembra.
On that evening Parliament also gave the Presidency letters confirming its willingness to conclude early 2nd reading agreements on the "missing two" thereby allowing the Council to adopt its two common positions at its meeting on 9.12.
V spravnem odboru je Svet zastopal predsedujoči Svetu in francoski državni sekretar za promet Dominique Bussereau.
At the conciliation committee the Council was represented by Mr. Bussereau, President-in-Office of the Council and Secretary of State for Transport of France.
Podpredsednik Tajani je zastopal Komisijo.
Vice-President Tajani represented the Commission.
Ponovno se je izkazalo, da sodelovanje najvišje politične ravni pri zelo težkih pogajanjih in dinamika spravnega večera lahko še kako vplivata na dosego dogovora.
This demonstrated once more that in the case of very difficult negotiations the involvement of the highest political level and the dynamics of a conciliation evening can make a difference in reaching agreement.
V celoti gledano je izid spravnega postopka za Parlament zelo ugoden.
The overall result of conciliation for Parliament is very positive.
Ne le, da je bil sočasno dosežen dogovor o „manjkajočih dveh“, pač pa so besedila, o katerih je bil dosežen dogovor v spravnem postopku, doživela številne izboljšave.
Not only were the "missing two" concluded in parallel but many improvements were also made to the texts agreed in conciliation.
To je v največji meri zasluga solidarnosti med poslanci, ki niso dovolili, da bi se razprava o katerem koli predlogu zaključila brez skupnega dogovora o drugih.
This was mainly due to the solidarity between Members who did not allow any file to be concluded without an overall agreement on all of them.
Vseeno pa je posebno dogajanje okoli pomorskega paketa pokazalo, da ni najbolje, če je isto predsedstvo odgovorno za pogajanja v drugi in tretji obravnavi.
The special circumstances of the Maritime Package showed, however, that it is not an ideal situation when the same Presidency is responsible for negotiations in 2nd and 3rd reading.
V Coreperju je kazalo, da predsedstvo le s težavo prepričuje države članice, naj se vendarle potrudijo, ker so, psihološko gledano, pogajanja že tako potekala predolgo.
In Coreper, it seemed very difficult for the Presidency to convince Member States to make yet another effort since psychologically the negotiations had been going on for too long already.
In medtem ko se je za Parlament s spravnim postopkom odprla povsem nova faza, je Svet v času istega predsedovanja na postopek gledal kot na nadaljevanje prejšnje faze.
For Parliament on the other side a completely new phase had started with conciliation, yet in Council, with the same Presidency, it was regarded as a continuation of the same phase.
III.2 Pričujoči predlog v spravnem postopku
III.2 This proposal in conciliation
Pogajanja o tem besedilu v spravnem postopku so se zaključila na ravni tristranskih srečanj, ki so se odvijala pred sejo spravnega odbora, ki je obravnaval samo preostala odprta vprašanja.
Negotiations on this file in conciliation were finalised at the level of trialogue meetings, prior to the meeting of the conciliation committee, which only dealt with the remaining open file.
Glavne točke doseženega sporazuma je mogoče povzeti v naslednjih točkah:
The main points of the agreement can be summarised as indicated below:
· pravna zaščita priznanih organizacij : vloga priznanih organizacij pri njihovem delovanju v imenu držav članic je bila pojasnjena z uvedbo nove uvodne izjave.
· Judicial protection of recognised organisations : The role of recognised organisations when acting on behalf of Member States was clarified with the inclusion of a new recital.
· Umik ali zavrnitev pooblastila : postopek, po katerem lahko država članica zavrne ali umakne pooblastilo priznane organizacije, je bil pojasnjen.
· Withdrawal or refusal of authorisation : The procedure, by which a Member State can refuse or withdraw an authorisation to a recognised organisation, was made clear.
Dogovor, dosežen ob koncu spravnega postopka, vključuje glavne točke predlogov sprememb, ki jih je Parlament sprejel na drugi obravnavi.
The agreement reached at the end of the conciliation procedure includes the main points in the amendments adopted by Parliament at second reading.
Delegacija zato Parlamentu predlaga, naj v tretji obravnavi skupno besedilo sprejme.
The delegation accordingly recommends that Parliament approves the joint text at third reading.
Skupno besedilo Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za inšpekcijski pregled in nadzor ladij, ter za ustrezne dejavnosti pomorskih uprav, o katerem se je sporazumel Spravni odbor (preoblikovanje)
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (recast)
o skupnem besedilu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij (prenovitev), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations (recast)
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij (prenovitev), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations (recast)
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3720/2008 – C6‑0043/2009 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3720/2008 – C6‑0043/2009 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0048 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0448 . on the Council common position
UL C 190 E, 29.7.2008, str.
OJ C 190 E, 29.7.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2008)0587 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2008)0826 )
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6‑0098/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0098/2009 ),
Hkrati je pritisk Parlamenta na Svet za dogovor o „manjkajočih dveh“ obrodil sadove.
In parallel the pressure applied by Parliament on Council to find agreement on the "missing two" began to yield results.
Tega večera je Parlament tudi predsedstvu izročil pisma, v katerih je potrdil svojo pripravljenost za dosego dogovora o „manjkajočih dveh“ v zgodnji fazi druge obravnave, kar bi Svetu omogočilo, da svoji skupni stališči sprejme na zasedanju 9.
On that evening Parliament also gave the Presidency letters confirming its willingness to conclude early 2nd reading agreements on the "missing two" thereby allowing the Council to adopt its two common positions at its meeting on 9.12.
Komisijo je zastopal podpredsednik Tajani.
Vice-President Tajani represented the Commission.
Ponovno se je izkazalo, da sodelovanje najvišje politične ravni pri zelo težkih pogajanjih in dinamika spravnega večera še kako lahko vplivata na dosego dogovora.
This demonstrated once more that in the case of very difficult negotiations the involvement of the highest political level and the dynamics of a conciliation evening can make a difference in reaching agreement.
Pogajanja o tem besedilu v spravnem postopku so se zaključila na ravni tristranskih srečanj, ki so se odvijali pred sejo spravnega odbora, ki je obravnaval samo preostala odprta vprašanja.
Negotiations on this file in conciliation were finalised at the level of trialogue meetings, prior to the meeting of the conciliation committee, which only dealt with the remaining open file.