natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– napredka pri razvoju tehnologije, vključno z energetsko učinkovitostjo postopka zajemanja („energetske izgube“), in predvidenega časovnega okvira za njeno komercialno dostopnost;
– progress with the development of the technology, including the energy efficiency of the capture process (the "energy penalty"); and its likely timescale for commercial availability;
– zadnjih ocen stroškov, povezanih z izgradnjo in obratovanjem kurilne naprave, opremljene s to tehnologijo; in
– latest estimates of the costs associated with constructing and operating a combustion plant fitted with such technology; and
– zadnjih ocen razpoložljivosti in zmogljivosti primerne infrastrukture za transport in geološko shranjevanje CO 2 v državah članicah.
– latest estimates of the availability and capacity of suitable infrastructure for the transport and geological storage of CO 2 within Member States.
Na podlagi tega poročila Komisija po potrebi pripravi zakonodajni predlog za spremembo direktive.
On the basis of this report the Commission shall, if necessary, present a legislative proposal amending the Directive.
Ta predlog spremembe zahteva, da Komisija pregleda direktivo in najpozneje do 31. decembra 2012 poda revidiran predlog.
This amendment requires the Commission to review the directive and make a revised proposal by no later than 31 December 2012.
To je potrebno, da imajo države članice čas za dodatne predstavitvene projekte in da ima Komisija dovolj časa, da znova pretehta pomembna vprašanja glede uporabe tehnologije CCS za nove elektrarne na fosilna goriva.
This is in order to give some time for additional demonstration projects to come forward within Member States while also giving the Commission an early opportunity to re-consider the important issue of mandating CCS technology for new fossil-fuel power plant.
To ne bo pomembno samo, da se zagotovi uporaba vseh možnih ukrepov za doseganje ciljev do leta 2020, temveč bo tudi v pomoč pri ohranjanju industrijske konkurenčnosti EU pri razvoju in uporabi novih tehnologij na globalni ravni.
This will be important not only to ensure that all possible measures to reach the 2020 targets are used but also to help maintain the industrial competitiveness of the EU in developing and deploying new technologies on a global scale.
Pregled in nadaljnji razvoj
Review and further developments
Komisija na osnovi izkušenj pri uporabi te direktive, vključno s poročili iz člena 25, in še posebej izkušenj s predstavitvenimi obrati CCS, ob upoštevanju tehničnega napredka in najnovejših znanstvenih spoznanj, do leta 2016 pripravi poročilo o uporabi te direktive ter pri tem med drugim upošteva:
On the basis of experience with the application of this D irective, including the reports referred to in Article 25, and particularly in the light of experience with CCS demonstration plants, taking into account technical progress and the most recent scientific knowledge, the Commission shall draw up a report by 2016 on the application of this D irective, taking account inter alia of:
(a) ali je trajni zajem CO 2 na ta način v največji možni meri preprečil ali zmanjšal negativne vplive na okolje in izključil posledične nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi;
(a) whether the permanent capture of CO 2 in this way has as far as possible prevented or reduced any negative effects on the environment and has ruled out any resulting danger to human health;
(b) določbe, ki veljajo za kurilne naprave za proizvodnjo električne energije z nominalno proizvodno zmogljivostjo 300 megavatov ali več, v zvezi s členom 32;
(b) the provisions applicable to power-producing combustion plants with a rated output of 300 MW or more, with reference to Article 32;
(c) določbe glede dostopa tretjih strani v členih 20 in 21.
(c) the provisions concerning third-party access in Articles 20 and 21.
Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu svoje poročilo skupaj z zakonodajnimi predlogi, kjer so potrebni.
The Commission shall submit its report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied where necessary by legislative proposals.
Komisija mora pregledati direktivo ob upoštevanju tehnološkega razvoja in najnovejših znanstvenih spoznanj.
In the light of technical progress and the most recent state of scientific knowledge, the Commission should carry out a review of the directive.
Člen 36 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do [ 1 leto po objavi].
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [ 1 year after publication] at the latest.
Komisiji nemudoma posredujejo besedilo navedenih predpisov in primerjalno tabelo med navedenimi predpisi in to direktivo.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do [ 2 leti po objavi].
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [ 2 years after publication] at the latest.
Trenutno znanje o geološkem shranjevanju ogljikovega dioksida ni zadostno, da bi lahko uvedli to obveznost že zdaj.
Present knowledge on the subject of geological storage of carbon dioxide is too inadequate to have this obligation now.
Predlagamo, da se razmisli o uvedbi obveznosti „pripravljenost na zajem“, vendar ne pred revizijo direktive v skladu s členom 35a.
We suggest to consider the imposition of “capture ready” obligation but not before the directive review stage in accordance with the article 35a.
Energetski sektor ne sme biti izpostavljen tveganju za nošenje stroškov, povezanih s CCS, dokler tehnologija ne bo povsem preizkušena na predstavitvenih projektih.
Energy sector should not be put risk of bearing costs related to CCS until the technology is completely tested within demonstration projects.
Upravičeni se zdijo samo stroški za raziskave in razvoj v sklopu zajemanja, transporta in geološkega shranjevanja CO 2 .
Only costs related to R&D (Research and Development) in scope of CO 2 capture, transport and geological storage seem to be justified.
Priloga I – odstavek 1
Annex I – paragraph 1
Opis lastnosti in ocenjevanje območij shranjevanja iz člena 4 se izvedeta v štirih korakih v skladu z naslednjimi merili.
The characterisation and assessment of storage sites referred to in Article 4 shall be carried out in four steps according to the following criteria.
Odstopanje od enega ali več navedenih meril je dovoljeno , če to ne vpliva na lastnosti in ocene v skladu z določbami iz člena 4.
Derogations from one or more of these criteria are permitted so long as the capacity of the characterisation and assessment to enable the determinations pursuant to Article 4 is not affected.
Opis lastnosti in ocenjevanje območij shranjevanja iz člena 4 se izvedeta v štirih korakih v skladu z najboljšimi razpoložljivimi tehnikami in naslednjimi merili.
The characterisation and assessment of storage sites referred to in Article 4 shall be carried out in four steps according to best available techniques and the following criteria.
Pristojni organ lahko dovoli odstopanje od enega ali več navedenih meril, če to ne vpliva na lastnosti in ocene v skladu z določbami iz člena 4.
Derogations from one or more of these criteria may be permitted by the competent authority so long as the capacity of the characterisation and assessment to enable the determinations pursuant to Article 4 is not affected.
Komisija za pomoč zaprosi odbor za tehnični pregled, da pripravi smernice, predvidene v členu 4(3), za pristojne organe o učinkoviti uporabi meril v skladu z najboljšimi razpoložljivimi tehnikami.
The Commission shall seek the assistance of the technical review committee to produce the guidelines , provided for in Article 4(3), for competent authorities on effective use of the criteria according to best available techniques.
Pristojni organ mora določiti, katere informacije so v posameznih primerih potrebne za ustrezno presojo, da bi kar najbolje ocenili tveganje uhajanja.
The competent authority must determine what information is needed in each case to make appropriate judgements to best assess the risk of leakage.
Nekatera merila so nejasna in se po pomembnosti zelo razlikujejo, zato je treba nujno pripraviti smernice o najboljših razpoložljivih tehnikah.
Some of the criteria are unclear, and they vary greatly in importance, so the production of guidelines on best available techniques is essential.
Priloga I – korak I – uvodni del
Annex I – Step 1 – introductory part
Zbere se dovolj podatkov za sestavo volumetričnega in dinamičnega tridimenzionalnega (3-D) modela zemljišča območja shranjevanja in prostorov za shranjevanje, vključno s krovnino, in okoliških prostorov, vključno s hidravlično povezanimi območji.
Sufficient data shall be accumulated to construct a volumetric and dynamic three-dimensional (3-D)-earth model f or the storage site and storage complex including the caprock, and the surrounding area including the hydraulically connected areas.
Ti podatki vključujejo najmanj naslednje zelo kompleksne lastnosti:
This data shall cover at least the following intrinsic complex characteristics:
Za določitev tveganja uhajanja se zbere dovolj informacij in podatkov za sestavo volumetričnega in dinamičnega tridimenzionalnega (3-D) modela zemljišča območja shranjevanja in prostorov za shranjevanje, vključno s krovnino, in okoliških prostorov, vključno s hidravlično povezanimi območji.
To establish the risk of leakage sufficient information and data shall be accumulated to construct a volumetric and dynamic three-dimensional (3-D)-earth model for the storage site and storage complex including the caprock, and the surrounding area including the hydraulically connected areas.
Ti podatki vključujejo najmanj naslednje lastnosti prostora za shranjevanje :
This data shall cover at least the following intrinsic characteristics of the storage complex :
Priloga I – korak 1 – točka (g)
Annex I – Step 1 – point (g)
(g) Obstoj in stanje naravnih in umetnih poti, ki bi lahko služile kot poti uhajanja;
(g) Presence and condition of natural and man-made pathways which could provide leakage pathways;
(g) Obstoj in stanje naravnih in umetnih poti, vključno z izviri in vrtinami, ki bi lahko služile kot poti uhajanja;
(g) Presence and condition of natural and man-made pathways including wells and boreholes which could provide leakage pathways;
Priloga I – korak 1 – točka (k)
Annex I – Step 1 – point (k)
(k) Morebitni vplivi na druge dejavnosti (npr. raziskovanje, proizvodnja in shranjevanje ogljikovodikov, geotermalna uporaba vodonosnikov);
(k) Possible interactions with other activities (e.g. exploration, production and storage of hydrocarbons, geothermal use of aquifers);
(k) Morebitni vplivi na druge dejavnosti (npr. raziskovanje, proizvodnja in shranjevanje ogljikovodikov), zlasti konkurenca z obnovljivimi viri energije (npr. geotermalna uporaba vodonosnikov) in zalogami podzemne vode ;
(k) Possible interactions with other activities (e.g. exploration, production and storage of hydrocarbons), especially competition with renewable energy sources (e.g. geothermal use of aquifers ) and underground water reserves;
Med ocenjevanjem območij shranjevanja bi bilo treba posebno pozornost posvetiti konkurenci med shranjevanjem CO 2 in obnovljivimi viri energije, kot je geotermalna uporaba vodonosnikov.
During the evaluation of storage sites there should be special attention for competition between CO2 storage and renewable energy sources, such as geothermal use of aquifers.
Priloga I – korak 1 – točka (l)
Annex I – Step 1 – point (l)
(l) Bližina potencialnih virov CO 2 (vključno z ocenami skupne potencialne mase CO 2 , ki je ekonomsko dostopna za shranjevanje).
(l) Proximity to the potential CO 2 source(s) (including estimates of the total potential mass of CO 2 economically available for storage).
(l) Bližina potencialnih virov CO 2 (vključno z ocenami skupne potencialne mase CO 2 , ki je ekonomsko dostopna za shranjevanje , ker je lahko transport na velike razdalje predrag ) , ter razpoložljivost varnega in ustreznega transportnega omrežja .
(l) Proximity to the potential CO2 source(s) (including estimates of the total potential mass of CO2 economically available for storage, since transport over long distances can become prohibitively expensive ) , as well as availability of a safe and adequate transport network .
Transport CO 2 na velike razdalje je lahko zelo drag, zato morajo pristojni organi vedeti, ali je na določenem območju na voljo dovolj zmogljivosti za shranjevanje.
Long distance transport of CO2 can become very expensive and therefore competent authorities need to know if there is enough storage capacity available in a certain area.
Priloga I – korak 3 – točka 3.1 (a)
Annex I – Step 3 – point 3.1 (a)
(a) Možna hitrost vbrizgavanja in lastnosti CO 2 ;
(a) Possible injection rates and CO 2 properties;
(a) Možna hitrost vbrizgavanja , lastnosti CO 2 in njihovo spreminjanje glede na temperaturo in tlak ;
(a) Possible injection rates , CO 2 properties and their change according to temperature and pressure ;
Sprememba fizikalnih in kemijskih lastnosti CO 2 zaradi temperature in tlaka lahko vpliva na varnostno opredelitev in rezultate modeliranja.
Change in physical and chemical properties of CO 2 with temperature and pressure may influence security characterization and modelling results
Priloga I – korak 3 – točka 3.1 (e)
Annex I – Step 3 – point 3.1 (e)
(e) Kratkoročne in dolgoročne simulacije (za določitev ostanka in obnašanja CO 2 v desetletjih in tisočletjih, vključno s hitrostjo raztapljanja CO 2 v vodi).
(e) Short and long-term simulations (to establish CO 2 fate and behaviour over decades and millennia including the solution velocity of CO 2 in water).
Ne zadeva slovenske različice.
(e) Short and long-term simulations (to establish CO 2 fate and behaviour over decades and millennia including the dissolution rate of CO 2 in water).
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
For technical clarification purposes.
Priloga I – korak 3 – točka 3.1 (f)
Annex I – Step 3 – point 3.1 (f)
(f) Obnašanje prostornine in tlaka v razmerju s časom formacije za shranjevanje;
(f) Pressure volume behaviour vs. time of the storage formation;
(f) Obnašanje tlaka in prostornine v razmerju s časom formacije za shranjevanje;
(f) Pressure and volume behaviour vs. time of the storage formation;
Priloga I – korak 3 – točka 3.1 (o)
Annex I – Step 3 – point 3.1 (o)
(o) Stopnja migracije (pri odprtih rezervoarjih);
(o) The rate of migration (in open-ended reservoirs);
(o) Stopnja migracije (pri rezervoarjih);
(o) The rate of migration (in reservoirs);
Odprti rezervoarji ne bi smeli biti dovoljeni, ker lahko predstavljajo nevarnost za ljudi in okolje.
Open-ended reservoirs should not be allowed because they can pose danger to the human and environment
Priloga I – korak 3 – točka 3.3 (c)
Annex I – Step 3 – point 3.3 (c)
(c) Kritičnih parametrov, ki vplivajo na morebitno uhajanje (npr. največji tlak rezervoarja, največja stopnja vbrizgavanja, občutljivost na različna predvidevanja v statičnih geoloških modelih zemljišča itd.);
(c) Critical parameters affecting potential leakage ( e.g. maximum reservoir pressure, maximum injection rate, sensitivity to various assumptions in the static geological Earth model(s) etc.);
(c) Kritičnih parametrov, ki vplivajo na morebitno uhajanje (npr. največji tlak rezervoarja, največja hitrost vbrizgavanja, temperatura, občutljivost na različna predvidevanja v statičnih geoloških modelih zemljišča itd.);
(c) Critical parameters affecting potential leakage ( e.g. maximum reservoir pressure, maximum injection rate, temperature, sensitivity to various assumptions in the static geological Earth model(s) etc.);
Priloga I – korak 4 – točka (a)
Annex I – Step 4 – point (a)
(a) Oceno izpostavljenosti – na podlagi značilnosti okolja in porazdelitve človeške populacije izven prostorov za shranjevanje ter možno obnašanje in preostanek CO 2 po uhajanju iz možnih poti iz 3. koraka;
(a) Exposure assessment – based on the characteristics of the environment and distribution of human population above the storage complex, and the potential behaviour and fate of leaking CO 2 from potential pathways identified under Step 3;
(a) (a) Oceno izpostavljenosti – na podlagi značilnosti okolja ter porazdelitve in dejavnosti človeške populacije nad prostori za shranjevanje ter možno obnašanje in preostanek CO 2 po uhajanju iz možnih poti iz 3. koraka;
(a) Exposure assessment – based on the characteristics of the environment, and the distribution and activities of the human population above the storage complex , and the potential behaviour and fate of leaking CO2 from potential pathways identified under Step 3;
Ocena ne bi smela temeljiti samo na okolju in populaciji, temveč tudi na dejavnostih v bližini.
The assessment should not only be based on the environment and the population but also on the surrounding activities.
Priloga I – korak 4 – točka (b)
Annex I – Step 4 – point (b)
(b) Ocena učinkov – na podlagi občutljivosti nekaterih vrst, skupnosti ali habitatov, povezanih z morebitnim uhajanjem iz 3. koraka.
(b) Effects assessment – based on the sensitivity of particular species, communities or habitats linked to potential leakage events identified under Step 3.
Kjer je primerno, vsebuje učinke izpostavljenosti povišanim koncentracijam CO 2 v biosferi (vključno s prstmi, morskimi usedlinami in bentoškimi vodami (zadušitev, hiperkapnija) ter nižjimi vrednostmi pH v navedenih okoljih kot posledice uhajanja CO 2 ).
Where relevant it shall include effects of exposure to elevated CO 2 concentrations in the biosphere (including soils, marine sediments and benthic waters (asphyxiation; hypercapnia) and reduced pH in those environments as a consequence of leaking CO 2 ).
Vsebuje tudi oceno učinkov drugih snovi, ki so lahko prisotne pri uhajanju tokov CO 2 (nečistote, prisotne v vbrizganem toku, ali nove snovi, nastale s shranjevanjem CO 2 ).
It shall also include an assessment of the effects of other substances that may be present in leaking CO 2 streams (either impurities present in the injection stream or new substances formed through storage of CO 2 ).
Te učinke se upošteva pri različnih časovnih in prostorskih lestvicah ter poveže z različnimi obsegi uhajanja.
These effects shall be considered at a range of temporal and spatial scales, and linked to a range of different magnitudes of leakage events.
Kjer je primerno, vsebuje učinke izpostavljenosti povišanim koncentracijam CO 2 v biosferi (vključno s prstmi, morskimi usedlinami in bentoškimi vodami (zadušitev, hiperkapnija) ter znižanim vrednostim pH v navedenih okoljih kot posledice uhajanja CO 2 ).
Where relevant it shall include effects of exposure to elevated CO 2 concentrations in the biosphere (including soils, marine sediments and benthic waters (asphyxiation; hypercapnia) and decreased pH in those environments as a consequence of leaking CO 2 ).
Vsebuje tudi presojo vpliva drugih snovi, ki so lahko prisotne pri uhajanju tokov CO 2 (nečistote, prisotne v vbrizganem toku, ali nove snovi, nastale s shranjevanjem CO 2 ).
It shall also include an assessment of the effects of other substances that may be present in leaking CO 2 streams (either impurities present in the injection stream or new substances formed through storage of CO 2 ).
Ti učinki se upoštevajo pri različnih časovnih in prostorskih lestvicah ter povežejo z različnimi obsegi uhajanja.
These effects shall be considered at a range of temporal and spatial scales, and linked to a range of different magnitudes of leakage events.
Priloga II – odstavek 1 – točka 1.1 – pododstavek 3 - uvodni del
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1.1 – subparagraph 3 - introductory part
Izbira tehnologije nadzora temelji na dobri praksi, razpoložljivi v času načrtovanja.
The choice of monitoring technology shall be based on best practice available at the time of design.
Uporabijo se lahko tudi naslednje možnosti:
The following options shall be considered and used as appropriate:
Izbira tehnologije temelji na dobri praksi, razpoložljivi v času načrtovanja , in se posodablja v skladu z razvojem najboljših razpoložljivih praks .
The choice of monitoring technology shall be based on best practice available at the time of design , and will be updated according to development of the best practices available .
Tehnološki razvoj je hiter, pomembno je uporabljati najboljše razpoložljive prakse.
Technological developments are fast, it is important to use the best practices available.
Priloga II – odstavek 1 – točka 1.1 (k)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1.1 (k)
(k) tehnologije, ki zagotavljajo informacije o obnašanju tlaka in prostornine ter ploščinski/navpični porazdelitvi izpusta CO 2 z uporabo numerične 3-D simulacije za 3-D geološke modele formacij za shranjevanje, pripravljene v skladu s členom 4 in Prilogo I;
(k) technologies that provide information about pressure volume behaviour and areal/vertical saturation distribution of CO 2 -plume by applying numerical 3-D-simulation to the 3-D-geological models of the storage formation established pursuant to Article 4 and Annex I;
Ne zadeva slovenske različice.
(k) technologies that provide information about pressure - volume behaviour and areal/vertical saturation distribution of CO 2 -plume by applying numerical 3-D-simulation to the 3-D-geological models of the storage formation established pursuant to Article 4 and Annex I;
Še mnogo desetletij bo svet odvisen od uporabe premoga za proizvodnjo pomembnega deleža svoje električne energije.
For many decades to come the world will rely upon the use of coal to generate a significant proportion of its electricity.
Brez uporabe tehnologije zajemanja in shranjevanja ogljika (CCS) za preprečevanje emisij CO 2 v ozračje bo nemogoče doseči svetovno zmanjšanje emisij, ki je potrebno, če hočemo preprečiti zelo resne posledice spremembe podnebja.
Without the use of Carbon Capture and Storage technology to prevent the release into the atmosphere of CO2 it will be impossible to achieve the global reduction in emissions necessary to prevent very severe consequences of climate change.
Direktiva določa okvir in pogoje uporabe tehnologije CCS v Evropi.
The Directive sets the framework and conditions for use of CCS technology in Europe.
Uvaja zahteve za ločevanje in zajem CO 2 ter za njegov transport prek cevovodov.
It introduces requirements for the separation and capture of CO2, and for its transport by pipeline.
Pojasnjuje postopek za opredelitev in varno uporabo območij shranjevanja v globokih podzemnih kamninah.
It explains the procedure for the identification and safe use of storage sites in rock deep underground.
Zakonodaja omogoča, da zasebni upravljavec za zelo dolgoročno skladiščenje CO 2 prenese odgovornost na državo članico, vendar le, ko bo skoraj gotovo, da možnosti uhajanja ne bo več.
The legislation provides for a private operator to pass responsibility to a Member State for the very long term storage of CO2, but only after there is near absolute certainty that the possibility of leakage has been reduced to zero.
Komisija predlaga tudi gradnjo vseh novih elektrarn kot „pripravljenih za zajem“, se pravi, da jih bo med njihovo obratovalno življenjsko dobo mogoče opremiti z opremo CCS.
The Commission also proposes that all new power plants be built as ‘capture-ready’, capable of being equipped with CCS facilities during their operational lifetimes.
Mnogo okoljevarstvenikov bo skeptičnih glede CCS; spravljanje CO 2 pod zemljo ni ravno idealna „zelena“ rešitev.
CCS will not be viewed favourably by every environmentalist; burying CO2 is hardly an ideal 'green' solution.
Vendar lahko služi kot premostitvena tehnologija, ki bo naši industrijski civilizaciji omogočila pridobiti dovolj časa za razvoj drugih možnosti, ki bodo omogočale popoln prehod s fosilnih goriv na proizvodnjo energije brez emisij ogljika.
But it may act as a bridging technology, helping our industrial civilisation buy time to develop alternatives on the scale necessary to permit a wholesale shift from fossil fuels to zero carbon means of power production.