natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· pregledno določanje odgovornosti za vzorce odhodkov institucij EU in
· transparent accounting in respect of the expenditure practices of the EU institutions, and
· izboljšanje proračunskega nadzora.
· improved budgetary control.
Pobuda zajema vse sektorske odhodke EU in ni omejena le na kmetijsko področje.
The initiative covers all EU expenditure sectors, and not just agricultural expenditure.
Svet in Evropski parlament sta zato v Uredbi (ES, Euratom) št. 1995/2006 o spremembah finančne uredbe sprejela določbo, v skladu s katero države članice za zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti „zagotovijo primerne naknadne letne objave upravičencev sredstev, ki izhajajo iz proračuna“ (glej člen 53b in člen 30(3) finančne uredbe).
In response to the initiative, the Council and Parliament incorporated into Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 amending the Financial Regulation a provision requiring Member States, with a view to protecting the Communities' financial interests, to ' ensure adequate annual ex post publication of beneficiaries of funds deriving from the budget ' (see Articles 53b and 30(3) of the Financial Regulation).
Zaradi posebnosti obračunskega obdobja za Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad je bila nujna uskladitev zadevnih sektorskih uredb, tj. na področju kmetijstva Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike.
In view of the specific characteristics of the accounting period for expenditure under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, adjustments to the relevant sectoral regulations, i.e for the agricultural sector Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy, were regarded as necessary.
Predlog v splošnem glede preglednosti določa naslednje osnovne ukrepe:
With the aim of achieving transparency, the proposal provides for the following basic measures:
· glede odhodkov EKJS: razdelitev na neposredna plačila in ostalo financiranje,
· EAGF expenditure: clear distinction between direct payments and other payments,
· glede odhodkov EKSRP: enkratni znesek celotnega javnega financiranja,
· EAFRD expenditure: all public funding to be combined in a single payment,
· naknadno letno objavo za posamezno proračunsko leto,
· annual ex-post publication concerning each financial year,
· objavo glede odhodkov EKSRP, realiziranih od 1. januarja 2007, in odhodkov EKJS, realiziranih od 16. oktobra 2007,
· publication of information concerning expenditure from EAFRD funds as from 1 January 2007 and concerning expenditure from EAGF funds as from 16 October 2007,
· objavo s strani držav članic na nacionalni ravni.
· publication of information at national level by the Member States.
Podrobnosti morajo biti določene v pravilih za izvajanje, ki jih sprejme Komisija.
The detailed arrangements will be laid down in the implementing provisions to be adopted by the Commission.
Že zdaj je treba za odhodke iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) v skladu s Prilogo VI k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1974/2006 objaviti seznam upravičencev, ki prejemajo pomoč iz programov za razvoj podeželja, imena aktivnosti in zneske javnih prispevkov za te aktivnosti.
In respect of expenditure from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), Annex VI to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 already provides for the publication of the list of beneficiaries who receive funding under the rural development programme, descriptions of the projects and the amounts provided from public funds.
Komisija je v drugi temeljni točki predlagala poostritev pravil o obremenitvi v primeru pomanjkljivih nadzornih sistemov v državah članicah.
The second focal point of the Commission proposal is more stringent rules on penalties for shortcomings in the Member States' control systems.
Komisija predlaga zmanjšanje ali začasno prekinitev (prihodnjih) plačil, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
The Commission is proposing that (future) payments should be reduced or suspended if the following conditions are met:
· Komisija je že uvedla dva finančna popravka glede navedenega ukrepa in iz istih razlogov;
· the Commission has already made two financial corrections concerning the same measure and for the same reason;
· ena ali več ključnih sestavin zadevnega nadzornega sistema ne obstaja ali niso učinkovite zaradi resnosti ali trdovratnosti ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti;
· one or more key components of the relevant control system are missing or, as a result of the seriousness or persistence of the shortcomings identified, ineffective, and
· analiza Komisije razkriva, da država članica ni izvedla priporočila Komisije za izboljšanje stanja in v bližnji prihodnosti pomanjkljivosti ne more ali ne bo odpravila.
· the Commission has come to the conclusion that the Member State concerned has failed to follow up its recommendations concerning corrective measures and the shortcomings cannot or will not be remedied in the immediate future.
Tako se bo izboljšala učinkovitost proračunskega nadzora in preprečilo izplačevanje denarja iz proračuna Skupnosti, če ključni elementi predpisanega nadzornega sistema niso na voljo ali ne delujejo.
The aim is to improve the efficiency of budgetary control and prevent circumstances arising in which money must be paid from the Community budget even though key components of the requisite control systems are known to be missing or ineffective.
Poročevalec pozdravlja zapozneli predlog Komisije za izboljšanje preglednosti in izvrševanja proračuna evropskih kmetijskih odhodkov.
Your rapporteur welcomes the long overdue Commission proposal to improve the transparency and implementation of European agricultural expenditure.
Opozarja, da je Evropski parlament takšen predlog zahteval že precej časa.
He points out that Parliament has long been calling for just such a proposal.
Zavedati se je treba, da pomanjkljivosti pri izvrševanju kmetijskih odhodkov, ki so še vedno ena od največjih proračunskih postavk Skupnosti, ogrožajo legitimnost skupne kmetijske politike in tudi celotne Evropske unije.
It should not be forgotten that shortcomings in the implementation of agricultural expenditure, which still represents one of the largest items of Community spending, call into question the legitimacy of not only the common agricultural policy, but of the European Union as a whole.
Razprava v zadnjih letih je pokazala, da so pomanjkanje jasnega in preglednega pregleda nad porazdelitvijo kmetijskih odhodkov in višino dejansko izvedenih plačil ter včasih dolgotrajne sankcije tudi pri očitnih kršitvah zakonodaje EU prispevale k objavi napačnih ali zelo izkrivljenih člankov v medijih.
The discussion conducted in recent years has shown that the lack of a clear, transparent overview of the way agricultural funding is allocated and the level of the payments actually made, along with what are sometimes excessive delays in imposing penalties even for blatant breaches of EU law, has encouraged the publication of erroneous, or at least greatly distorted, articles in the press.
V javnosti držav članic je to povzročilo zelo izkrivljeno razumevanje skupne kmetijske politike in celotne Unije.
As a result, the public in the Member States has an equally distorted view of the CAP and the Union as a whole.
Poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča pa navajajo, da se je kakovost upravljanja kmetijskih odhodkov in nadzora nad njim v zadnjih letih stalno izboljševala.
However, reports drawn up by the European Court of Auditors show that the administration of and checks on agricultural expenditure have steadily improved in recent years.
Poročevalec zato pozdravlja dejstvo, da se kmetijski odhodki ne obravnavajo ločeno, ampak so sestavni del sektorske pobude za preglednost.
Your rapporteur therefore welcomes the fact that agricultural expenditure is not considered in isolation, but rather as one aspect of a cross-sectoral transparency initiative.
Tudi to lahko spodbudi objektivnejše javne razprave v zvezi s to vsebino.
This may also encourage a more objective public debate on this issue.
Vendar poročevalec pričakuje, da bo Komisija hitro ukrepala tudi na drugih področjih pobude za preglednost, npr. pri spodbujanju združenj, za kar je sama odgovorna.
Nevertheless, your rapporteur is looking to the Commission to take similarly prompt action in other areas relating to the transparency initiative, e.g. that dealing with the funding of associations, for which the Commission itself is accountable.
B) Natančna obravnava
(B) Detailed appraisal
Poročevalec se pridružuje mnenju Komisije, da se morajo podatki objaviti na ravni držav članic, ker bi nastali znatni dodatni upravni in tehnični stroški, če bi podatke, ki jih zberejo in upravljajo države članice, objavila Komisija.
Your rapporteur shares the Commission's view that data should be published at Member State level, since publication by the Commission itself of data collected and administered by the Member States would lead to a substantial increase in red tape.
Po mnenju poročevalca zadošča tudi objava na ravni plačilnih agencij, ki so odgovorne za zbiranje podatkov in plačila.
In your rapporteur's view, publication by the paying agencies, i.e. the bodies responsible for collecting data and making payments, would also be adequate.
Za boljšo preglednost objav poročevalec predlaga obvezno objavo podatkov v internetu ter povezavo spletnih strani držav članic s stranmi Komisije in povezavo spletnih strani znotraj posamezne države članice.
With a view to increasing the transparency of the publication system, your rapporteur is proposing a binding requirement that the data should be published on the Internet and that links should be established between the Member States' web pages and those of the Commission and web pages created within a Member State.
Iz istega razloga tudi predlaga, da se podatki o plačilih iz EKJS razčlenijo vsaj tako, da je jasno, za katere prednostne osi so plačila, ker se značilnosti plačil iz EKJS znatno razlikujejo glede na posamezno prednostno os.
For the same reason, he is proposing that data on payments from the EARDF should at least be subdivided in such a way as to make clear which axis they relate to, since these payments differ substantially depending on the axis concerned.
Poročevalec predlaga dodatno najmanjšo vsebino za objavo, da se izboljša primerljivost med državami članicami.
Your rapporteur is proposing further minimum criteria for published information with a view to increasing comparability between Member States.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba bistvena vprašanja o varstvu podatkov urediti že v uredbi Sveta in ne šele v izvedbeni zakonodaji, ker objava znatno vpliva na osebne pravice posameznika.
Your rapporteur takes the view that key data protection issues should be dealt with in the Council regulation itself, and not in the implementing legislation, since the data published have a direct bearing on individual privacy.
Nujno potrebno je, da so zadevne osebe o objavi predhodno obveščene, če je mogoče že med zbiranjem podatkov, najpozneje pa pred objavo.
It is essential that the individuals concerned should be informed in advance of the publication of data, if at all possible at the time when that data is collected.
To je tudi v skladu s stališčem evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov.
Such an arrangement would also be consistent with the opinion issued by the European Data Protection Supervisor.
Ker je preglednost temeljni element izboljšanega proračunskega nadzora, je treba pri neobjavi ali zelo pomanjkljivi objavi informacij zmanjšati plačila.
Since transparency is fundamental to improved budgetary control, in the event of a failure to publish data, or if there are serious shortcomings in the data published, payments should be reduced.
Nekateri dodatni predlogi so namenjeni zlasti pojasnitvi.
A number of further proposals are designed solely to clarify the text.
Države članice se lahko v skladu s svojimi prednostnimi področji in nacionalnimi predpisi prosto odločijo, da bodo podatke dodatno razčlenile.
Member States are free to subdivide data further, in keeping with their national priorities and rules.
Ureditev iz uredbe Komisije se črta, ker bi drugače veljali dve različni ureditvi za isto področje.
The corresponding provisions in the Commission regulation on transparency have been repealed, so as to avoid any situation arising in which two differing sets of provisions on the same matter are in force at the same time.
Poročevalec je v zvezi s predlogom za zmanjšanje prihodnjih plačil le pojasnil, da mora kršitev zadevati področje iste plačilne agencije, pri zmanjšanju pa je treba upoštevati resnost že ugotovljene kršitve.
With regard to the proposal to reduce future payments, your rapporteur has merely clarified that the breach of the rules must relate to the area covered by one single paying agency and that the level of the reduction will be determined by the seriousness of the continuing breach of the rules.
Splošni cilj predloga Komisije je izvajanje obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz zahteve, da se informacije o upravičencih skladov Skupnosti objavijo, vključene v finančno uredbo z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1995/2006, ki določa, da bo vse potrebno določeno v ustreznih pravilih posameznih sektorjev.
The overall aim of the Commission proposal is to implement the obligation coming from the requirement concerning the publication of information incumbent on beneficiaries of Community funds, as inserted into the Financial Regulation by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006, which provides that the necessary details shall be laid down in the relevant sector-specific rules.
Zato je treba spremeniti Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike.
It is therefore necessary to modify Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy.
Poleg tega predlog obravnava druga odprta vprašanja v zvezi z učinkovitim izvajanjem uredbe, kot so zmanjšanje in prekinitev mesečnih in vmesnih plačil državam članicam, sprememba izjem k tako imenovanemu pravilu 24 mesecev in izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije.
Furthermore, the proposal deals with other outstanding issues regarding the effective application of the Regulation, such as the reduction and suspension of monthly and intermediate payments to Member States, modification of the exceptions to the so-called 24-month rule and the Commission's implementing powers.
Vsebuje tudi nekaj tehničnih prilagoditev.
It also contains some technical adaptations.
Pripravljavec mnenja predlog Komisije kot celoto sicer odobrava, vendar predlaga nekaj izboljšav.
While welcoming the Commission proposal, in overall terms, your draftsman suggests some improvements to it.
V skladu z odstavkom 3 člena 53b finančne uredbe bodo države članice "na ustrezni nacionalni ravni pripravile letni povzetek razpoložljivih revizij in izjav".
According to Article 53b paragraph 3 of the Financial Regulation, Member States shall " produce an annual summary at the appropriate national level of the available audits and declarations ".
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da bi morale države članice pred prejetjem sredstev Skupnosti v določenem letu kot del letnega pregleda na podlagi revizij in izjav, ki jih imajo na razpolago, predložiti izjavo o tem, da so finančne nadzorne strukture, določene z zakonodajo Skupnosti, ustrezne in učinkovite.
The draftsman suggests that, prior to receiving Community funding in year 'N' and on an annual basis, as part of this annual summary, Member States should issue a statement, based on available audits and declarations, declaring that the financial control structures required by Community law are in place and functioning.
Poleg tega pripravljavec mnenja predlaga nadaljnje izboljšave v zvezi z zmožnostjo Komisije, da bi delovala skladno s členom 274 Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti.
In addition, the draftsman suggests further improvements in the Commission's ability to comply with Article 274 TEC.
Zato bi morali spremljanje plačilnih agencij, ki ga Komisija izvaja v državah članicah, ki so v EU vstopile med letoma 2004 in 2007, uporabiti tudi v starih državah članicah.
Therefore, the example of the Commission's monitoring of paying agencies in the Member States who joined in 2004 and 2007 should also be applied in the older Member States.
Ker je v skladu s členom 274 Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti Komisija odgovorna za izvrševanje proračuna EU, bi morala imeti možnost, da odvzame akreditacijo, če akreditirana plačilna agencija ne izpolnjuje ali več ne izpolnjuje pogojev, razen če država članica uvede potrebne spremembe v roku, ki ga Komisija določi glede na resnost problema.
As the Commission is responsible under Article 274 TEC for the implementation of the EU-budget, where an accredited paying agency does not meet or no longer meets the conditions, the Commission should be able to withdraw accreditation unless the Member State makes the necessary changes within a certain period to be determined by the Commission according to the severity of the problem.
Kar zadeva mehanizem izterjave, pripravljavec mnenja meni, da lahko splošno pravilo enake porazdelitve bremena v primeru neizvršene izterjave, torej 50 % iz proračuna ES in 50 % iz proračuna države članice, privede do nasprotnih učinkov.
As regards the recovery mechanism, the draftsman considers that the general rule of equal burden-sharing in case of non-recovery, i.e. 50 % for the EC budget and 50 % for the budget of the Member State concerned, is counterproductive.
To pomeni, da je država odgovorna le za 50 % vsote, četudi ne izterja nobenih sredstev.
This means that even when not recovering any sum, the Member State is only liable for 50% of the amounts.
Že v uredbi Sveta je predvideno, da država članica lahko zadrži celo 100 % uspešno izterjanih sredstev, če lahko z upravno ali sodno odločbo dokaže, da ni bilo nepravilnosti.
The Council Regulation already foresees that if the Member State concerned can prove the absence of an irregularity by a definitive administrative or court decision it may even keep 100% of the amounts recovered successfully.
Nazadnje pripravljavec mnenja predlaga, naj Komisija v času pregleda predloži ocenjevalno poročilo v obdobju 2008–2009, pa tudi v letu 2011, do predložitve naslednjih finančnih perspektiv.
Finally, it is suggested that the Commission present an evaluation report in 2008-2009, in the course of the Health Check, as well as in 2011, in time for the next financial perspectives.
To je tudi skladno z izjavo št. 9 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
This is also in line with Declaration No. 9 of the Interinstitutional Agreement.
Drugo poročilo o oceni naj se med drugim osredotoči na bolj objektivno razdelitev med kmetijskim skladom in skladom za razvoj podeželja.
The second evaluation report should focus, among other things, on the introduction of a more objective division of the agricultural and rural development funds.
Komisija naj oceni sedanji sistem in poišče možne izboljšave.
The Commission should evaluate the current system and look forward to possible adjustments.
Razdelitev na podlagi objektivnega kriterija je tudi v skladu s proračunskima načeloma univerzalnosti in ravnotežja.
A division based on more objective criteria is also in line with the budgetary principles of universality and equilibrium.
(1a) V členu 6 se pododstavek 1 odstavka 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(1a) In Article 6, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 shall be replaced by the following:
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo o vsaki izdani akreditaciji, vključno z oceno, ali plačilna agencija izpolnjuje pogoje iz odstavka 1.
Member States shall inform the Commission of any accreditation given, including an assessment of the paying agency's fulfilment of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo tudi v primeru večjih sprememb v strukturi ali delovanju akreditirane plačilne agencije, ki bi lahko vplivale na izpolnjevanje pogojev s strani plačilnih agencij."
Member States shall also inform the Commission in the case of any major changes in the structures or the functioning of the accredited paying agency which might possibly affect fulfilment of the conditions by the paying agencies."
Države članice so dolžne obvestiti Komisijo o vsaki akreditaciji plačilne agencije in priložiti oceno o izpolnjevanju pogojev.
Member States should be obliged to inform the Commission of any accreditation given to a paying agency, including an assessment of their fulfilment of the conditions.
To ji bo omogočilo spremljanje, kako države članice akreditirajo plačilne agencije, in bo države članice spodbudilo, da izboljšajo svoje postopke akreditiranja.
This will enable the Commission to monitor the accreditation of paying agencies by the Member States and it will stimulate Member States to improve their accreditation procedures.
(1b) V členu 6 se odstavek 4 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(1b) In Article 6, paragraph 4 shall be replaced by the following:
Če akreditirana plačilna agencija ne izpolnjuje ali ne izpolnjuje več enega ali več pogojev iz odstavka 1, ji Komisija lahko odvzame akreditacijo, razen če država članica uvede potrebne spremembe v roku, ki ga določi Komisija glede na resnost problema."
Where an accredited paying agency does not meet or no longer meets one or more of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, the Commission may withdraw accreditation unless the Member State makes the necessary changes within a period to be determined by the Commission according to the severity of the problem."
Za nadaljnje izboljšanje zmožnosti Komisije, da deluje skladno s členom 274 Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti, je treba spremljanje plačilnih agencij, ki ga Komisija izvaja v državah članicah, ki so v EU vstopile leta 2004 in 2007, uporabiti tudi v starih državah članicah.
In order to further improve the Commission's ability to comply with Article 274 EC, the example of the Commission's monitoring of paying agencies in the Member States who joined in 2004 and 2007 should also be applied in the older Member States.
(1c) V členu 6 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(1c) In Article 6, the following paragraph shall be added:
Če akreditirana plačilna agencija ne izpolnjuje ali ne izpolnjuje več enega ali več pogojev iz odstavka 1, Komisija naroči državi članici, ki je izdala akreditacijo, naj jo odvzame, razen če plačilna agencija uvede potrebne spremembe v roku, določenem glede na resnost problema."
Where an accredited paying agency does not meet or no longer meets one or more of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, the Commission shall order the accrediting Member State to withdraw the accreditation unless the paying agency makes the necessary changes within a period to be determined in relation to the severity of the problem."
V primeru ugotovljene kršitve je dolžna ukrepati.
In case of any misconduct found the Commission should also be obliged to act.
(1d) Člen 7 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(1d) Article 7 shall be replaced by the following:
"Certifikacijski organi
"Certification bodies
Certifikacijski organ je subjekt javnega ali zasebnega prava, ki ga država članica določi za certificiranje točnosti, celovitosti in natančnosti računovodskih izkazov akreditiranih plačilnih agencij ob upoštevanju sistemov upravljanja in nadzora.
The certification body shall be a public or private legal entity designated by the Member State with a view to certifying the truthfulness, completeness and accuracy of the accounts of the accredited paying agency, taking account of management and control systems.
Kjer certifikacijski organ ne more ali ne more več izvajati svojih nalog, država članica umakne imenovanje, razen če certifikacijski organ izvede nujne spremembe v roku, ki je določen glede na resnost problema.
Where a certification body cannot perform or can no longer perform its tasks, the Member State shall withdraw the designation unless the certification body makes the necessary changes within a period to be determined in relation to the severity of the problem.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo tudi v primeru večjih sprememb v strukturi ali delovanju certifikacijskih organov, ki bi lahko vplivale na njihovo zmožnost izpolnjevanja nalog.
Member States shall also inform the Commission in the case of any major changes to the structures or the functioning of the certification bodies which might possibly affect the certification bodies' ability to perform their tasks.