natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Znanstveni dokazi so pokazali tudi, da bi lahko postopki na embrionalnih in fetalnih oblikah na zgodnejši stopnji razvoja vodili do bolečine, trpljenja, stiske ali trajne poškodbe, če bi bilo razvojnim oblikam dovoljeno živeti po prvih dveh tretjinah njihovega razvoja.
Scientific evidence has also shown that procedures on embryonic and foetal forms at an earlier stage of development could result in pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm, should the developmental forms be allowed to live beyond the first two thirds of their development.
(7) V tej direktivi bi morale biti zajete tudi embrionalne in fetalne oblike vretenčarjev v primerih, ko obstajajo znanstveni dokazi, da je pri teh oblikah v zadnji tretjini njihovega razvoja povečana nevarnost čutenja bolečine, trpljenja in stiske, kar lahko tudi negativno vpliva na njihov nadaljnji razvoj.
(7) This Directive should also cover embryonic and foetal forms of vertebrate animals, in cases where there is scientific evidence showing that such forms in the last third of their development have an increased risk of experiencing pain, suffering and distress, which may also affect negatively their subsequent development.
Znanstveni dokazi so pokazali tudi, da bi lahko postopki na embrionalnih in fetalnih oblikah vrst sesalcev na zgodnejši stopnji razvoja vodili do bolečine, trpljenja, stiske ali trajne poškodbe, če bi bilo razvojnim oblikam dovoljeno živeti po prvih dveh tretjinah njihovega razvoja.
Scientific evidence has also shown that procedures on embryonic and foetal forms of species of mammals at an earlier stage of development could result in pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm, should the developmental forms be allowed to live beyond the first two thirds of their development.
Vključevanje embrionalnih in fetalnih oblik je poljubno, saj ne obstajajo dokazi o zmožnosti čutenja bolečine.
Inclusion of all embryonic and foetal forms is arbitrary given the lack of conclusive scientific evidence of sentient capacity.
(8 ) Čeprav je zaželeno, da bi se uporaba živih živali v postopkih nadomestila z drugimi metodami, ki ne vključujejo uporabe živih živali, ostaja uporaba živih živali še naprej potrebna za varstvo zdravja ljudi in živali ter okolja.
(8 ) While it is desirable to replace the use of live animals in procedures by other methods not entailing the use of live animals, the use of live animals continues to be necessary to protect human and animal health and the environment.
(8) Uporaba živih živali ostaja še naprej potrebna za varstvo zdravja ljudi in živali ter okolja , v okviru sedanjih znanstvenih omejitev.
(8) The use of live animals continues to be necessary to protect human health, animal health and the environment , within current scientific limitations.
Vendar pa ta direktiva predstavlja pomemben korak k uresničevanju cilja popolne nadomestitve postopkov na živih živalih za znanstvene namene, takoj ko bo to z znanstvenega vidika mogoče.
However this directive represents an important step towards achieving the goal of the full replacement of procedures on live animals for scientific purposes as soon as it is scientifically possible to do so.
V ta namen poskuša direktiva olajšati in spodbujati napredek alternativnih metod in zagotoviti visoko raven varstva živali, uporabljenih v postopkih.
To meet that end, this directive seeks to facilitate and promote the advancement of alternative methods and to ensure a high level of protection for animals used in procedures.
To direktivo je treba redno pregledovati v skladu z razvojem znanstvenih ukrepov in ukrepov za varstvo živali.
This directive should be reviewed regularly in light of evolving scientific and animal protection measures.
(8a) Poskusi na živalih ostajajo pomemben pristop k znanstvenemu razvoju, ki zagotavlja zelo visok standard raziskav za javno zdravje.
(8a) In light of scientific progress, the use of animal experiments remains an important means of ensuring a very high standard of public health research.
Poleg poskusov, ki se ne delajo na živalih, se v mnogih primerih živali uporabljajo za znanstvene namene, ker je treba spoštovati evropska merila za kakovost, učinkovitost in varnost.
In many cases animals are used for scientific purposes with a view to complying with the European criteria of quality, effectiveness and safety, complementing tests not involving animals.
(9) Oskrba in uporaba živih živali, namenjenih uporabi v znanstvene namene, se urejata z mednarodno sprejetimi načeli nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja.
(9) The care and use of live animals for scientific purposes is governed by internationally established principles of replacement, reduction and refinement.
Za zagotovitev, da je način vzreje, oskrbe in uporabe živali v postopkih v Skupnosti v skladu z načini iz drugih mednarodnih in nacionalnih standardov zunaj Skupnosti, je treba pri izvajanju te direktive sistematično upoštevati nadomestitev, zmanjšanje in izboljšanje.
To ensure that the way in which animals are bred, cared for and used in procedures in the Community is in line with that of the other international and national standards outside the Community, the replacement, reduction and refinement should be considered systematically when implementing this Directive.
Komisija zagotovi visoko raven preglednosti glede uporabe živali in obveščanja javnosti o izvajanju ukrepov za varstvo živali ter napredku pri nadomeščanju metod z uporabo živali.
The Commission shall ensure a high level of transpar e ncy in relation to the use of animal s and in terms of reporting to the public on the implementation of animal protection measures and progress made towards replacing animal methods.
(10) Živali imajo same po sebi vrednost, ki jo je treba spoštovati.
(10) Animals have an intrinsic value in themselves which must be respected.
Obstajajo tudi etični pomisleki splošne javnosti o uporabi živali v postopkih.
There are also ethical concerns of the general public as regards the use of animals in procedures.
Zato je treba živali vedno obravnavati kot čuteča bitja, njihova uporaba v znanstvenih postopkih pa bi morala biti omejena na področja, ki pripomorejo k napredku znanosti in nazadnje koristijo bodisi zdravju ljudi ali živali bodisi okolju.
Therefore, the animals should always be treated as sentient creatures and their use in scientific procedures should be restricted to areas which advance science and ultimately benefit human or animal health, or the environment.
Uporaba živali v znanstvenih postopkih na drugih področjih, ki spadajo pod pristojnost Skupnosti, bi morala biti prepovedana.
Use of animals for scientific procedures in other areas under Community competence should be prohibited.
Zato je treba živali vedno obravnavati kot čuteča bitja, njihova uporaba v znanstvenih postopkih pa bi morala biti omejena na področja, ki pripomorejo k napredku znanosti in temeljnih dognanj, ker to lahko nazadnje koristi bodisi zdravju ljudi ali živali bodisi okolju.
Therefore, the animals should always be treated as sentient creatures and their use in scientific procedures should be restricted to areas which advance science and fundamental knowledge, since this may ultimately have benefits for e.g. human or animal health, or the environment.
Zato mora biti uporaba živali v znanstvene namene mogoča le, ko nadomestne možnosti, ki ne vključujejo živali, niso na voljo.
The use of animals in scientific procedures should therefore only be considered where a non-animal alternative is not available.
Zgodovina napredka medicine je polna primerov, v katerih se je izkazalo, da je upoštevanje temeljnih dognanj zelo koristno za prihodnost, čeprav v času odkritja niso bila priznana.
The history of medical progress is littered with examples where the pursuit of fundamental knowledge turned out to be of great utility in the future though that utility was not recognised at the time of the study.
(11a) Komisija si mora v skladu s cilji Akcijskega načrta Skupnosti za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010 ( KOM(2006)0013 ) 1 prizadevati za mednarodno promocijo dobrega počutja živali, ki se uporabljajo v znanstvene namene, ter zlasti spodbujati nadomestitev, zmanjšanje in izboljšanje postopkov na živalih preko Svetovne organizacije za zdravje živali (OIE) in z zavzemanjem za vključitev standardov dobrega počutja živali med merila, ki se uporabljajo za oceno skladnosti z dobro laboratorijsko prakso.
(11a) In accordance with the objectives of the Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006 – 2010 ( COM(2006)0013 ) 1 the Commission should endeavour to promote the welfare of animals used for scientific purposes internationally, and in particular to seek promotion of the replacement, reduction and refinement of animal procedures through the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), and by seeking to add animal welfare standards to the criteria assessed in order to establish compliance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP).
1 UL C 49, 28.2.2006.
1 OJ C 49 of 28.02.2006.
Sporočilo Komisije o Akcijskem načrtu Skupnosti za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010 navaja spodbujanje visokih standardov dobrega počutja živali v EU in na mednarodni ravni kot enega svojih osnovnih ciljev.
The Communication from the Commission on a Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010 lists promotion of high animal welfare standards in the EU and at the international level as one of its primary objectives.
Spodbujanje nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja postopkov na živalih preko Svetovne organizacije za zdravje živali bi podprlo ta cilj, hkrati pa bi tudi zaščitilo evropsko industrijo z dvigom standardov dobrega počutja živali v tretjih državah.
Promotion of the replacement, reduction and refinement of animal procedures through the World Organisation for Animal Health would not only further this objective, but would protect EU industry by raising animal welfare standards in third countries.
(12) Izbira metod in vrst, ki bodo uporabljene, neposredno vpliva na število uporabljenih živali in njihovo dobro počutje.
(12) The choice of methods and the species to be used have a direct impact on both the numbers of animals used and their welfare.
Pri izbiranju metod bi tako morala biti zagotovljena izbira metode, s katero se lahko zagotovijo najprimernejši dokazi in ki bo verjetno povzročila najmanj bolečin, trpljenja ali stiske.
The choice of methods should therefore ensure the selection of the method that is able to provide most adequate results and likely to cause the minimum pain, suffering or distress.
Take izbrane metode bi morale uporabljati najmanjše mogoče število živali, s katerim bi se zagotovili statistično zanesljivi rezultati, in izbirati vrste z najnižjo stopnjo nevrofiziološke občutljivosti, ki so najboljše za ekstrapolacijo na ciljno vrsto.
Such selected methods should use the minimum number of animals that would provide statistically reliable results and choose the species with the lowest degree of neurophysiological sensitivity that are optimal for the extrapolation into target species.
Take izbrane metode bi morale uporabljati najmanjše mogoče število živali, s katerim bi se zagotovili zanesljivi rezultati, in izbirati vrste z najnižjo stopnjo nevrofiziološke občutljivosti, ki so najboljše za ekstrapolacijo na ciljno vrsto.
Such selected methods should use the minimum number of animals that would provide reliable results and choose the species with the lowest degree of neurophysiological sensitivity that are optimal for the extrapolation into target species.
Statistični podatki niso vedno pomembni, včasih je že majhno število živali dovolj za znanstveni pomen.
No need to have always a statistical relevance, sometimes a small number of animals is enough for a scientific relevance.
(14) Uporaba neprimernih metod za ubijanje lahko živali povzroči veliko bolečino, stisko ali trpljenje.
(14) The use of inappropriate methods for killing an animal can cause significant pain, distress and suffering to the animal.
Stopnja usposobljenosti osebe, ki to nalogo izvaja, je prav tako pomembna.
The level of competence of the person carrying out this operation is equally important.
Živali bi tako smela ubijati samo pooblaščena oseba s humano metodo, ki se šteje za primerno glede na vrsto.
Animals should therefore be killed only by an authorised person with a humane method that is considered appropriate to the species.
Živali bi tako smela ubijati samo usposobljena in pooblaščena oseba s humano metodo, ki se šteje za primerno glede na vrsto.
Animals should therefore be killed only by a trained and authorised person with a humane method that is considered appropriate to the species.
(16) S sedanjimi znanstvenimi dognanji je uporaba primatov razen človeka v znanstvenih postopkih pri biomedicinskih raziskavah še vedno nujna.
(16) With current scientific knowledge the use of non-human primates in scientific procedures is still necessary in biomedical research.
Zaradi njihove genetske podobnosti človeku in njihovih visoko razvitih družbenih veščin uporaba primatov razen človeka povzroča posebne etične in praktične težave v smislu izpolnjevanja njihovih vedenjskih, okoljskih in družbenih potreb v laboratorijskem okolju.
Due to their genetic proximity to human beings and to their highly developed social skills, the use of non-human primates in scientific procedures raises specific ethical and practical problems in terms of meeting their behavioural, environmental and social needs in a laboratory environment.
Poleg tega uporaba primatov razen človeka javnost najbolj skrbi.
Furthermore, the use of non-human primates is of the highest concern to the public.
Njihova uporaba bi morala biti zato dovoljena samo na tistih področjih biomedicine, ki so bistvena za korist ljudi in za katera še ni na voljo nobene druge nadomestne metode , ter samo kadar se postopki izvajajo v povezavi s kliničnimi stanji, ki imajo znaten vpliv na stanje bolnika, saj so smrtno nevarna ali izčrpavajoča, ali za ohranitev zadevne vrste primatov.
Therefore the use of non-human primates should only be allowed in those essential biomedical areas for the benefit of human beings for which no other replacement alternative methods are yet available and only in cases where the procedures are carried out in relation to clinical conditions having a substantial impact on patients’ day-today functioning as being either life-threatening or debilitating , or for the preservation of the respective non-human primate species.
S temeljnimi raziskavami na nekaterih področjih biomedicine lahko zagotovimo nove informacije, ki so pomembne za veliko število smrtno nevarnih in izčrpavajočih kliničnih stanj pri človeku.
Fundamental research in some areas of the biomedical sciences can provide important new information relevant to many life-threatening and debilitating human conditions.
Njihova uporaba bi morala biti zato dovoljena samo na tistih področjih biomedicine, ki so bistvena za korist ljudi in za katera še ni na voljo nobene druge nadomestne metode ali za ohranitev zadevne vrste primatov.
Therefore the use of non-human primates should only be allowed in those essential biomedical areas for the benefit of human beings for which no other replacement alternative methods are yet available, or for the preservation of the respective non-human primate species.
S temeljnimi raziskavami na nekaterih področjih biomedicine lahko zagotovimo nove informacije, ki bodo v prihodnosti pomembne za veliko število smrtno nevarnih in izčrpavajočih kliničnih stanj pri človeku.
Fundamental research in some areas of the biomedical sciences can provide important new information relevant , at some future stage , to many life-threatening and debilitating human conditions.
S poudarjanjem pomena postopkov za resna klinična stanja pri človeku bi lahko izključili veliko temeljnih raziskav, ki v času izvajanja niso neposredno povezane z lajšanjem resnih stanj pri človeku, vendar so lahko sčasoma bistvene za klinični napredek.
The emphasis on relevance of procedures to serious human clinical conditions would preclude much fundamental research that, at the time it is carried out, has no direct association with relief of serious human conditions, but which may in due course be central to clinical advances.
(18) Lovljenje primatov v divjini je za živali zelo stresno ter poveča nevarnost poškodb in trpljenja med ujetjem in prevozom.
(18) The capture of non-human primates from the wild is highly stressful for the animals and increases the risk of injury and suffering during capture and transport.
Zaradi postopnega zmanjševanja lova na živali v divjini za potrebe vzreje bi bilo treba za uporabo v znanstvenih postopkih čim prej dati na voljo samo živali, ki so potomke živali, vzgojenih v ujetništvu .
In order to gradually end the capturing of animals from the wild for breeding purposes, only animals that are the offspring of an animal which has been bred in captivity should be made available for use in scientific procedures as soon as possible .
Enote, ki vzrejajo ali dobavljajo primate razen človeka bi zato morale imeti pripravljeno strategijo za podpiranje in lajšanje postopnega prehoda k temu cilju.
Establishments breeding and supplying non-human primates should therefore have a strategy in place to support and facilitate the progressive move towards that goal.
(18) Zaradi postopnega zmanjševanja lova na živali v divjini za potrebe vzreje bi bilo treba čim prej pripraviti obsežno znanstveno oceno o možnostih, da se uporaba živali omeji le na tiste iz samozadostnih kolonij .
(18) In order to gradually end the capturing of animals from the wild for breeding purposes, a thorough scientific evaluation should be conducted as soon as possible to the feasibility of limiting the animals use d to those from self-sustaining colonies.
Pred uvedbo pravne zahteve je treba opraviti ustrezno znanstveno analizo.
A proper scientific analysis is required before this is set as a legal requirement.
(21) Za povečanje preglednosti, olajševanje odobritve projektov in zagotavljanje orodij za spremljanje skladnosti bi bilo treba uvesti razvrstitev postopkov glede na težo njihovih posledic, ki bi temeljila na ocenjeni stopnji bolečine, trpljenja, stiske in trajnosti poškodbe, ki se povzročijo živalim.
(21) To enhance transparency, facilitate the project authorisation and provide tools for monitoring compliance, a severity classification of procedures should be introduced on the basis of estimated level of pain, suffering, distress and lasting harm that is inflicted on the animals.
Zaradi natančnejšega določanja posameznih stopenj teže posledic bi morala Komisija skupaj z zainteresiranimi stranmi pripraviti merila, ki bi temeljila na obstoječih sistemih razvrščanja glede na težo posledic v državah članicah in sistemih, ki jih podpirajo mednarodne organizacije.
To give precision how severity classes should be assigned, the Commission should develop criteria with stakeholder input using existing severity classification schemes in place in Member States as well as those promoted by international organisations as basis.
(22) Z etičnega vidika bi morala obstajati zgornja meja bolečine, trpljenja in stiske, ki pri živalih nikoli ne bi smela biti presežena med znanstvenimi postopki.
(22) From the ethical standpoint, there should be an upper limit of pain, suffering and distress, above which animals should never be subjected in scientific procedures.
Izvajanje postopkov, ki povzročajo hudo bolečino, trpljenje ali stisko in jih verjetno podaljšujejo, bi zato moralo biti prepovedano .
To that effect, the performance of procedures that result in severe pain, suffering or distress and which is likely to be prolonged, should be prohibited .
Pri pripravi skupne oblike poročil bi bilo treba namesto teže posledic, ki je bila predvidena ob etičnem vrednotenju, upoštevati dejansko težo posledic, ki jih pretrpi žival.
When developing a common format for reporting purposes, instead of the predicted severity at the time of the ethical evaluation, the actual severity experienced by the animal should be taken into account.
(22) Z etičnega vidika bi morala obstajati zgornja meja bolečine, trpljenja in stiske, ki pri živalih ne bi smela biti presežena med znanstvenimi postopki.
(22) From the ethical standpoint, there should be an upper limit of pain, suffering and distress, above which animals should not be subjected in scientific procedures.
Izvajanje postopkov, ki povzročajo hudo bolečino, trpljenje ali stisko in jih verjetno podaljšujejo, zato običajno ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno .
To that effect, the performance of procedures that result in severe pain, suffering or distress and which is likely to be prolonged, should not ordinarily be permitted .
(23) Število živali, ki se uporabljajo v postopkih, bi bilo mogoče zmanjšati z večkratnim izvajanjem postopkov na živalih, če to ne odstopa od znanstvenega cilja ali poslabša dobrobiti živali.
(23) The number of animals used in procedures could be reduced by performing procedures on animals more than once, where this does not detract from the scientific objective or result in poor animal welfare.
Kljub temu je treba vnovično uporabo živali pretehtati v primerjavi z zmanjševanjem morebitnih neželenih učinkov na njihovo dobro počutje, pri tem pa upoštevati življenjske izkušnje posamezne živali.
However, the re-use of animals should be judged against minimising any adverse affects on their welfare, taking into account the lifetime experience of the individual animal.
Vnovično uporabo živali je zaradi tega mogočega navzkrižja treba obravnavati za vsak primer posebej in jo omejiti samo na postopke, pri katerih so bolečine, stiska in trpljenje znatno zmanjšani .
As a result of this potential conflict, the re-use of animals should be considered on a case-by-case basis and limited only to those procedures where pain, distress and suffering are significantly reduced.
Vnovično uporabo živali je zaradi tega mogočega navzkrižja treba obravnavati za vsak primer posebej in jo omejiti samo na postopke, pri katerih so skupne bolečine, stiska in trpljenje etično utemeljene .
As a result of this potential conflict, the re-use of animals should be considered on a case-by-case basis and limited to only those procedures where the cumulative pain, distress and suffering are ethically justified
(24) Na koncu postopka bi bilo treba na podlagi dobrega počutja živali in morebitnih tveganj za okolje sprejeti najprimernejšo odločitev o prihodnosti živali.
(24) At the end of the procedure, the most appropriate decision should be taken as regards the future of the animal on the basis of animal welfare and potential risks to the environment.
Živali, katerih dobro počutje bi bilo ogroženo, bi bilo treba ubiti s humano metodo.
The animals whose welfare would be compromised should be killed using a humane method.
V nekaterih primerih bi bilo treba živali spustiti na prostost, živalim, kot so psi in mačke, pa znova poiskati dom pri družinah, saj obstaja velika zaskrbljenost javnosti zaradi usode teh živali.
In some cases, animals should be set free or animals such as dogs and cats should be allowed to be re-homed in families as there is a high public concern as to the fate of those animals.
Če bi enote omogočale vnovično nastanitev v domovih pri družinah, je zelo pomembno, da je vzpostavljena shema za ustrezno socializacijo teh živali za zagotovitev uspešne vnovične nastanitve, izogibanje nepotrebni stiski živali in zagotovitev javne varnosti
Should establishments allow re-homing, it is essential that there is a scheme in place to provide the appropriate socialisation to those animals in order to ensure successful re-homing as well as to avoid unnecessary distress to the animals and to guarantee public safety.
(24) Na koncu odobrenega postopka bi bilo treba na podlagi dobrega počutja živali in morebitnih tveganj za okolje sprejeti najprimernejšo odločitev o prihodnosti živali.
(24) At the end of an authorised procedure, the most appropriate decision should be taken as regards the future of the animal on the basis of animal welfare and potential risks to the environment.