natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To je zmogljivost, pri kateri lahko naročnik zahteva od določenega podjetja, ki zagotavlja telefonske storitve, brezplačno zaporo določene vrste odhodnih klicev ali določene vrste številk ali druge vrste komunikacij .
i.e. the facility whereby the subscriber can, on request to a designated undertaking that provides telephone services, bar outgoing calls or other kinds of communication of defined types or to defined types of numbers free of charge.
Obstajati mora možnost, da se zaščita, ki jo imajo uporabniki telefonskih komunikacij po visoki ceni (klici na številke z dodatnimi stroški ali mednarodni klici), lahko razširi na druge vrste komunikacij, ki predstavljajo podobne težave, kot so storitve SMS ali MMS.
The protection that users of telephone communications enjoy at high cost (calls to numbers with additional charges, or international calls) should be extensible to other kinds of communications that pose similar problems, such as SMS or MMS.
Priloga I – Del A – točka (e)
Annex I – Part A – point (e)
Priloga I – Del A – točka (e)
Annex I – part A – point (e)
Države članice morajo odobriti posebne ukrepe, ki morajo biti sorazmerni, nediskriminacijski in objavljeni, za kritje neplačil računov operaterjev, določenih v skladu s členom 8.
Member States are to authorise specified measures, which are to be proportionate, non-discriminatory and published, to cover non-payment of telephone bills of operators designated in accordance with Article 8.
S temi ukrepi je treba zagotoviti, da je naročnik ustrezno in vnaprej obveščen o vsaki posledični prekinitvi storitve ali odklopu.
These measures are to ensure that due warning of any consequent service interruption or disconnection is given to the subscriber beforehand.
Vsaka prekinitev storitve je omejena na zadevno storitev.
Any service interruption shall normally be confined to the service concerned.
Razen v primeru goljufije, stalnih zamud pri plačilu ali stalnega neplačevanja države članice zagotovijo, da lahko nacionalni regulativni organi odobrijo odklop iz omrežja zaradi neplačevanja storitev, ki se zagotavljajo prek omrežja .
Exceptionally, in cases of fraud, persistent late payment or non‑payment, Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities are able to authorise disconnection from the network as a result of non-payment of bills for services provided over the network .
Odklop z omrežja zaradi neplačevanja računov naj se opravi šele po ustreznem opozorilu naročnika.
Disconnection for non-payment of bills should take place only after due warning is given to the subscriber.
Države članice lahko pred popolnim odklopom odobrijo obdobje z omejenimi storitvami, v katerem so dovoljene samo storitve, ki naročniku ne povzročajo stroškov (na primer klici na 112).
Member States may allow a period of limited service prior to complete disconnection, during which only calls that do not incur a charge to the subscriber (e.g. "112" calls) are permitted.
Razen v primeru goljufije, stalnih zamud pri plačilu ali stalnega neplačevanja ti ukrepi zagotovijo do mere, ki je tehnično izvedljiva, da je vsaka prekinitev storitve omejena na zadevno storitev.
Except in cases of fraud, persistent late payment or non‑payment, these measures shall ensure , as far as is technically feasible, that any service interruption is confined to the service concerned .
Dostop do storitev v sili prek številke 112 se lahko v primeru večkratne zlorabe uporabnika onemogoči.
Access to emergency services through 112 may be blocked in case of repeated misuse by the user.
Pretirano in nepotrebno birokratsko bi bilo zahtevati od nacionalnih regulativnih organov, naj odobrijo prekinitev v primeru goljufije, stalnih zamud pri plačilu ali stalnega neplačevanja.
It would be disproportionate and unnecessarily bureaucratic to require NRAs to authorise disconnection in case of fraud, persistent late payment or non-payment.
Priloga I – Del A – točka e a (novo)
Annex I – Part A – point e a (new)
Priloga I – Del A – točka (e) a (novo)
Annex I – Part A – point (e) a (new)
(ea) Nadzor stroškov
(ea) Cost control
Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da nacionalni regulativni organi od vseh podjetij, ki nudijo elektronske komunikacijske storitve, zahtevajo, da ta naročnikom omogočijo način nadzora stroškov za telekomunikacijske storitve, vključno z brezplačnimi opozorili potrošnikom v primeru nenavadnih vzorcev porabe.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities require all undertakings providing electronic communication services to offer means for subscribers to control the costs of telecommunication services , including free of charge alerts to consumers in case of abnormal consumption patterns.
Mnogi potrošniki so se zaradi pomanjkanja znanja o tarifah ali nevednosti glede samodejne uporabe določenih storitev, pogosto povezane s podatkovnimi storitvami ter mednarodnim glasovnim ali podatkovnim gostovanjem soočili z izjemno visokimi stroški za telekomunikacije.
Many consumers have been confronted with exceptionally high telecom expenditures due to a lack of knowledge of tariffs or unawareness of automatic use of certain services, in many cases linked to data services and international voice or data roaming.
Zaradi tega jim je treba s pomočjo ukrepov za nadzor stroškov ponuditi možnost večjega nadzora nad vsemi komunikacijskimi storitvami.
It is thus necessary to offer them the means to have greater control over all their communications’ services through cost control measures.
Hkrati mora ponudnik potrošnikom vsaj enkrat letno posredovati proaktivne informacije o najboljši ponudbi glede na njihove vzorce porabe.
At the same time, consumers should be given proactive information on the best offer in relation to their consumption pattern at least once a year by the current provider.
Priloga I – Del A – točka e b (novo)
Annex I – Part A – point e b (new)
(eb) Najboljši nasvet
(e b ) Best advice
Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da nacionalni regulativni organi od vseh podjetij, ki nudijo elektronske komunikacijske storitve, zahtevajo, da ta svojim uporabnikom enkrat na leto na podlagi vzorca porabe uporabnika za prejšnje leto priporočajo najboljši tarifni paket, ki je na voljo.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities require all undertakings providing electronic communication services to recommend their best available tariff package to consumers once a year on the basis of the consumer’s consumption pattern for the previous year.
Priloga I – Del B – točka b a (novo)
Annex I – Part B – point b a (new)
(ba) Storitve v primeru kraje
(ba) Services in the event of theft
Države članice zagotovijo oblikovanje brezplačne telefonske številke, ki je skupna vsem ponudnikom mobilnih telefonskih storitev, za prijavo kraje terminala in takojšnjega prenehanja storitev, povezanih z naročnino.
Member States shall ensure that a freephone number common to all mobile telephony service providers is set up for reporting the theft of a terminal and immediately suspending the services associated with the subscription.
Tudi uporabnikom invalidom je treba omogočiti dostop do te storitve.
It must also be possible for disabled users to access this service.
Uporabnike je treba redno obveščati o obstoju te številke, ki mora biti dovolj enostavna, da se jo lahko zapomnijo.
Users must be regularly informed of the existence of this number, which must be easy to remember.
Dostopne točke in postopki za prijavo kraje se razlikujejo od ponudnika do ponudnika.
The access points and procedures for reporting theft vary from operator to operator.
To pomeni, da prijava kraje traja dlje in je uporaba naročnine za kradljivca enostavnejša na škodo uporabnika, katerega telefon je bil ukraden.
This means it takes longer to report a theft, making it easier for the thief to use the subscription, to the detriment of the user whose phone has been stolen.
Enotna, enostavno dostopna številka bi rešila to težavo.
A single, easy-to-access number would resolve this problem.
Predlog direktive – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a directive– amending act
Priloga I – Del B – točka b b (novo)
Annex I – Part B – point b b (new)
(bb) Zaščitna programska oprema
(bb) Protection software
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko nacionalni regulativni organi od ponudnikov zahtevajo, da naročnikom omogočijo brezplačno, zanesljivo in enostavno zaščito in/ali filtrirajočo programsko opremo, ki nadzira dostop otrok ali ranljivih ljudi do nezakonitih ali nevarnih vsebin.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities are able to require operators to make available free of charge to their subscribers reliable and easy-to-use protection and/or filtering software to control access by children or vulnerable people to unlawful or dangerous content.
Da bi preprečili dostop ranljivih ljudi do neprimernih vsebin, se lahko enostavno uporabi filtrirajoča programska oprema.
Filtering software can easily be used to prevent vulnerable people from accessing inappropriate content.
Zato morajo ponudniki tako programsko opremo dati na voljo uporabnikom, kar že počnejo v številnih državah.
Operators should therefore make such software available to users, as happens in many countries.
Priloga II – uvodni del
Annex II – introductory part
Nacionalni regulativni organ je odgovoren, da v skladu s členom 21 zagotovi objavo informacij iz te priloge.
The national regulatory authority has a responsibility to ensure that the information in this Annex is published, in accordance with Article 21.
Nacionalni regulativni organ mora odločiti, katere informacije morajo objaviti podjetja, ki zagotavljajo javna komunikacijska omrežja in/ali javno dostopne telefonske storitve, in katere informacije mora objaviti sam, da lahko potrošniki izbirajo na podlagi prejetih informacij.
It is for the national regulatory authority to decide which information is to be published by the undertakings providing public communications networks and/or publicly available telephone services and which information is to be published by the national regulatory authority itself, so as to ensure that consumers are able to make informed choices.
Če informacije objavljajo podjetja, ki zagotavljajo javna komunikacijska omrežja in/ali javno dostopne telefonske storitve, lahko nacionalni regulativni organ določi način objavljanja informacij, da zagotovi popolno obveščenost potrošnikov.
Where information is published by the undertakings providing public communications networks and/or publicly available telephone services, the national regulatory authority may specify the manner in which the information is published, in order to ensure that consumers are fully informed.
Črtano besedilo obravnava člen 21(2).
The deleted text is covered by Article 21(2)
Priloga II – točka 2.2
Annex II – point 2.2
Standardne tarife z navedbo, kaj je vključeno v vsak tarifni element (npr. pristojbine za dostop, vse vrste pristojbin za uporabo, vzdrževanje), vključno s podrobnostmi o uporabljenih standardnih popustih ter posebnih in ciljanih tarifnih shemah.
Standard tariffs with an indication of what is included in each tariff element (e.g. charges for access, all types of usage charges, maintenance charges) , and including details of standard discounts applied and special and targeted tariff schemes.
Standardne tarife z navedbo nudenih storitev in vsebino vsakega tarifnega elementa (npr. pristojbine za dostop, vse vrste pristojbin za uporabo, vzdrževanje).
Standard tariffs , indicating the services provided and the content of each tariff element (e.g. charges for access, all types of usage charges, maintenance charges) .
Vključene so tudi podrobnosti o uporabljenih standardnih popustih , posebnih in ciljnih tarifnih shemah ter vseh dodatnih stroških in stroških, povezanih s terminalsko opremo.
Details of standard discounts applied , special and targeted tariff schemes and any additional charges , as well as costs with respect to terminal equipment , shall also be included .
Pojasnitev in za vključitev stroškov, povezanih s terminalsko opremo.
Clarification, and to include costs related to terminal equipment
Priloga III – tabela – stolpca 2 in 3
Annex III – table – columns 2 and 3
Priloga VI – točka 1
Annex VI – point 1
Enotni premešalni algoritem in nekodirani sprejem
Common scrambling algorithm and free-to-air reception
Celotna potrošniška oprema, ki je namenjena sprejemanju navadnih digitalnih televizijskih signalov (npr. radiodifuzijske storitve prek kopenskega, kabelskega ali satelitskega prenosa, ki so prvenstveno namenjene fiksnemu sprejemu, na primer za DVB-T, DVB-C ali DVB-S), za prodajo ali najem ali je kako drugače na voljo v Skupnosti in se z njo lahko razmešajo digitalni televizijski signali, mora imeti naslednje značilnosti:
All consumer equipment intended for the reception of conventional digital television signals (i.e. broadcasting via terrestrial, cable or satellite transmission which is primarily intended for fixed reception, such as DVB-T, DVB-C or DVB-S) , for sale or rent or otherwise made available in the Community, capable of descrambling digital television signals, is to possess the capability to:
– omogočiti mora razmešanje takih signalov v skladu z enotnim evropskim premešalnim algoritmom, kot ga upravlja priznana evropska organizacija za standardizacijo, zdaj je to ETSI (Evropski institut za telekomunikacijske standarde);
– allow the descrambling of such signals according to a common European scrambling algorithm as administered by a recognised European standards organisation, currently ETSI;
– prikazati mora signale, ki so se prenašali kot čisti signali, pod pogojem, da najemnik pri najemu take opreme ravna v skladu z ustrezno najemno pogodbo.
– display signals that have been transmitted in the clear provided that, in the event that such equipment is rented, the rentee is in compliance with the relevant rental agreement.
Pojasnilo priloge z namenom zagotoviti, da tehnične specifikacije ne predstavljajo ovire novim storitvam, kot sta IPTV ali mobilna televizija.
To clarify the Annex with a view to ensuring that the technical specifications do not act as an obstacle to new services such as IPTV or mobile TV.
Okoliščine direktive
The Directive in Context
Predlog sprememb, ki ga je pripravila Komisija za regulativni sveženj za elektronske komunikacije iz leta 2002, in ki zadeva pravice potrošnikov, je eden od treh predlogov zakonodajne reforme za spremembo obstoječega zakonodajnega okvira, ki je začel veljati leta 2002.
The Commission proposal for Amendments to Consumer Rights aspects of the 2002 Electronic Communications Legislative package is one of three legislative reform proposals to amend the current regulatory framework which entered into force in 2002.
Večji del sprememb se nanaša na direktivo o univerzalnih storitvah in pravicah uporabnikov, manjši del na direktivo o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah, ena manjša sprememba pa na uredbo o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov.
The bulk of the reforms affect the Universal Services and Users’ Rights Directive, with a smaller number of changes to the E-Privacy Directive, and one minor change to the Consumer Protection Co-operation Regulation.
Povezana dodatna predloga sprememb zajemata spremembe ostalih treh direktiv o elektronskih komunikacijah (odobritev, dostop in okvir)
There are two additional related reform proposals which cover changes to the other three Electronic Communication Directives (Authorisation, Access and Framework)
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembah Direktiv 2002/21/ES o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, 2002/19/ES o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju in 2002/20/ES o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev (KOM(2007)697 konč.) in na predlagano ustanovitev organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij (organ)
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and services, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (COM(2007) 697 final) and the proposed creation of a European Electronic Communications Market Authority (Authority)
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij (KOM(2007) 699 konč.) .
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Electronic Communications Market Authority (COM(2007) 699 final) .
Poročevalec je zato tesno sodeloval s poročevalci teh predlogov sprememb, da se zagotovi usklajeni regulativni pristop.
Your Rapporteur has therefore collaborated closely with the Rapporteurs of these reform proposals, to ensure a consistent regulatory approach.
Odbora za pravne zadeve in notranji trg sta v svojem poročilu leta 2001 (za katerega je bil odgovoren tudi poročevalec) spremenila in odobrila izvirni predlog direktive o univerzalnih storitvah in pravicah uporabnikov ter dodala številne dodatne določbe, da bi povečala varstvo potrošnikov in dostop do komunikacijskih storitev za uporabnike invalide.
In its 2001 Report (for which your Rapporteur was also responsible), the Legal Affairs and Internal Market Committee amended and approved the original proposal for a Universal Services and Users’ Rights Directive, adding a number of additional provisions to enhance consumer protection and access to communications services for disabled users.
Poročevalec zato pozdravlja nadaljnje izboljšave iz tega predloga sprememb, ki krepi načela, ki jim je prej sledil odbor.
The Rapporteur therefore welcomes the further enhancements made in this reform proposal which reinforce the line that the Committee previously followed.
Predlog spremembe direktive o univerzalnih storitvah in pravicah uporabnikov ne spreminja sedanjega obsega ali pojma univerzalne storitve v Evropski uniji, ki bo predmet ločenih posvetovanj v letu 2008.
This proposal to amend the Universal Services and Users’ Rights Directive does not alter the current scope or concept of universal service in the European Union, which will be subject to a separate consultation in 2008.
Poročevalec zato na teh področjih ni predlagal sprememb.
Your Rapporteur has, therefore, not proposed any changes in these areas.
Cilja aktualnega predloga, na podlagi katerih ga je treba obravnavati, sta:
The two objectives of the current proposal, against which it should be considered, are as follows:
1) Krepitev in izboljšanje varstva potrošnikov in pravic uporabnikov na področju elektronskih komunikacij, med drugim tako da potrošniki prejmejo več informacij o cenah in nakupnih pogojih, ter olajševanje dostopa do elektronskih komunikacij in njihove uporabe, vključno s storitvami za uporabnike invalide.
1) Strengthening and improving consumer protection and user rights in the electronic communication sector, through – among other aspects – providing consumers with more information about prices and supply conditions, and facilitating access to and use of e-communications, including services for disabled users.
2) Povečanje varstva zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov posameznikov na področju elektronske komunikacije, zlasti z obvezno priglasitvijo kršitev varovanja osebnih podatkov in izboljšanimi mehanizmi izvrševanja.
2) Enhancing the protection of individuals’ privacy and personal data in the electronic communication sector, in particular through a new data breach notification requirement and improved enforcement mechanisms.
Pri teh vprašanjih je poročevalec tesno sodeloval z Odborom za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, ki ima skladno s členom 47 poslovnika Parlamenta status pridruženega odbora, saj je neposredno odgovoren za zakonodajne predloge o varovanju podatkov.
In these aspects, your Rapporteur has worked closely with the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee, which has the status of associated Committee under Rule 47 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure, as it is directly responsible for data protection legislative proposals.
Poročevalec zato v osnutku poročila na tej stopnji ni predlagal sprememb o teh vprašanjih.
Your Rapporteur has therefore not, at this stage, proposed amendments on these issues in his draft Report.
Glavni pristop, ki ga je uporabil poročevalec
The main approach taken by your Rapporteur
Poročevalec je z namenom poenostavitve, pojasnitve in krepitve določb predlagal številne spremembe naslednjih delov predlogov.
Your Rapporteur has proposed a number of amendments to the following areas of the proposals, with the broad aim of simplifying, clarifying and strengthening the provisions.
še zlasti:
In particular:
- pojasnil obveznosti zagotavljanja predpogodbenih informacij
- Clarified the pre contractual information requirements
- razširil določbe o informacijah in preglednosti
- Broadened the information and transparency provisions
- dodal nove določbe, s katerimi potrošniki dobijo informacije o njihovih pravnih obveznostih pri uporabi storitev (zlasti spoštovanje avtorskih pravic) in dodal sprejetje ukrepov za varnost
- Added new provisions for consumers to be given information on their legal obligations in using a service (especially respect of copyright) and the adoption of security safeguards
- okrepil določbe o storitvah za uporabnike invalide
- Reinforced the service provisions for disabled users
- pripravil podrobne spremembe, povezane z razpoložljivostjo številke za klic v sili "112" in lokacijo kličočega
- Made detailed amendments related to “112” emergency number availability and caller location
- pojasnil in poenostavil kakovost zahtev glede storitev
- Clarified and simplified the quality of service requirements
- jasneje opredelil odgovornost nacionalnih regulatorjev za vsakodnevno tržno uveljavljanje pravic potrošnikov, ki odstranjuje nekatere odgovornosti na tem področju, ki jih je predlagala Komisija
- More clearly defined the responsibility of National Regulators for day to day market enforcement of consumer rights, removing some of the proposed Commission responsibilities in these areas.
- črtal določbe za podporo številskega prostora "3883", za katerega je zdaj predvideno zelo omejeno povpraševanje potrošnikov z razvojem nomadskih storitev "Voice over Network".
- Removed provisions for support of the “3883” numbering space, for which very limited consumer demand is now foreseen with the evolution of nomadic “Voice over Network” services.
Poročevalec te predloge priporoča odboru in pričakuje nadaljnje predloge za krepitev teh uporabnih sprememb.
Your Rapporteur commends these proposals to the Committee, and is open to receive further suggestions to enhance these useful reforms.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/22/ES o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami, Direktive 2002/58/ES o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij in Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users´ rights relating to electronic communications networks, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on consumer protection cooperation
Tako imenovani telekomunikacijski paket predstavlja prepotrebno posodobitev povečini obstoječe zakonodaje.
The so-called telecoms package is a much needed update of mostly existing legislation.
Pri tem se porodi vrsta vprašanj, še posebej za del paketa, ki se nanaša na zasebnost in elektronske komunikacije,
In particular for the e-Privacy part of the package this presents us with a number of dilemmas.
Področja uporabe podanih predlogov niso zadostno opredeljena.
The scope of the proposals is not sufficiently well defined.