natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Navedena odločitev upošteva tudi potrebo po učinkoviti uporabi sredstev Urada ter sorazmernost uporabljenih sredstev .
That decision shall also take account of the need for efficient utilisation of the Office’s resources and for proportionality in the means deployed.
Upoštevale se bodo tudi anonimne prijave, če bo sum v zadostni meri utemeljen .
Anonymous information may also be taken into account if it constitutes sufficiently strong grounds for suspicion.
Načelo učinkovitosti lahko velja tudi pri upravljanju proračuna.
The principle of efficiency is applicable to budgetary management itself.
Ne bi se ga smelo uporabiti v zvezi s sklepom o začetku preiskave, saj je treba za vsako ceno preprečiti možnost, da bi se Urad moral odreči preiskavi zaradi pomanjkanja sredstev zanjo.
It is not desirable to apply it to the decision on the opening of an investigation, in order to avoid at all costs a situation in which OLAF would have to refrain from carrying out an investigation for lack of resources with which to conduct it.
Dodatek pojasnjuje, da se lahko preiskava uvede na podlagi anonimne prijave.
This insertion makes it possible to indicate that an investigation may also be opened in response to an anonymous complaint.
Zaradi učinkovitega boja proti goljufiji in korupciji anonimnost ne more biti razlog za izključitev, saj bi strah pred razkritjem imena prijavitelja lahko le-tega odvrnil od prijave.
If fraud and corruption are to be tackled effectively, the fact that information has been received from an anonymous source should not be grounds for ruling out an investigation: otherwise there would be a risk that complaints would not be made for fear that the identity of the complainant might be disclosed.
Člen 5 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
(1a) Generalni direktor Urada po posvetovanju z izvršnim odborom Urada in v skladu z določbami o nadzoru zakonitosti iz člena 14(2) sprejme sklep o začetku preiskave.
The decision to open an investigation shall be taken by the Direc tor Gen eral of the Office after consulting the Office's executive board and in accordance with the provisions concerning checks on legality which are laid down in Article 14(2 ) .
Generalni direktor po posvetovanju z izvršnim odborom Urada in v skladu s postopkom, ki je natančno določen v postopkovnih pravilih, sprejme dokončni sklep, ali naj se preiskava začne ali ne.
The final decision as to whether or not to open an investigation is taken by the Director General after consultation with the executive board of OLAF, in accordance with the detailed procedure stipulated in the procedural code.
Glede na sedanjo prakso Urada izvršni odbor predloži generalnemu direktorju mnenje, ko se preiskava začne.
OLAF's current practice is for the executive board to deliver an opinion to the Director General when an investigation is opened.
Člen 5 – odstavek 2 – alinea 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Odločitev o začetku zunanje preiskave sprejme generalni direktor Urada na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo zadevne države članice ali Komisije .
The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director‑General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or the Commission .
Odločitev o začetku zunanje preiskave sprejme generalni direktor Urada na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo zadevne države članice ali institucije Evropskih skupnosti ali Evropske unije .
The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director‑General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or one of the institutions of the European Communities or of the European Union .
Institucije morajo prav tako imeti možnost, da od generalnega direktorja urada OLAF zahtevajo začetek preiskave.
The institutions should also be given the power to ask the Director General of OLAF to open an investigation.
Člen 5 – odstavek 4 – alinea 2 a (novo)
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Pred začetkom preiskave in v celotnem času njenega trajanja institucije, organi in uradi omogočijo Uradu takojšen in neposreden dostop do baze podatkov o upravljanju sredstev Skupnosti ter do drugih podatkov in ustreznih informacij, ki omogočajo Uradu, da preveri točnost posredovanih informacij.
Prior to the opening and throughout the duration of an investigation, the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall provide the Office with immediate and automatic access to databases concerned with the management of Community funds and to any other base containing relevant data and information which will enable the Office to check that the information forwarded is accurate.
Treba je ustvariti pravno podlago, ki bo uradu OLAF omogočala takojšen in neposreden dostop do baze podatkov in vseh drugih ustreznih informacij v fazi predhodnega preverjanja informacij.
It is desirable to insert a legal basis to make it possible for OLAF to gain immediate and automatic access to databases and any other relevant information during the stage when the information is undergoing preliminary assessment.
Tako se lahko takoj preveri verodostojnost posredovanih informacij, kar izboljša učinkovitost morebitne kasnejše preiskave.
The accuracy of the information forwarded is verified rapidly and if an investigation is subsequently opened its effectiveness is improved.
Člen 1 – točka 4 a
Article 1 – point 4 a
a) V odstavkih 1 in 3 se „direktor“ nadomesti z „generalni direktor“.
(a) in paragraphs 1 and 3, “the Director” is replaced by “the Director ‑General”;
a) Prvi odstavek se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(a) Paragraph 1 is replaced by the following text:
Preiskavo vodi generalni direktor Urada.
The Direc tor Gen eral of the Office shall direct the conduct of investigations.
S pisnim pooblastilom lahko določi operativnega direktorja Urada, da vodi preiskavo.
He may issue written instructions to an operational Director of the Office to direct the conduct of investigations.
Preiskavo vodijo za to določeni uslužbenci Urada, pristojen in odgovoren zanjo pa je generalni direktor Urada.“
Investigations shall be conducted under the authority and the responsibility of the Direc tor Gen eral of the Office by agents nominated by the Office. " .
Treba je jasno določiti, da generalni direktor lahko pooblasti enega izmed direktorjev Urada, da vodi preiskave, kot je predvideno v pravilniku urada OLAF.
It is desirable to stipulate clearly that the Director General has the power to instruct a Director of OLAF to conduct investigations, as provided for in the OLAF Manual.
Treba je tudi navesti, da je generalni direktor odgovoren za preiskavo.
It is also worthwhile to mention that he is the person responsible for the investigation.
Končna odločitev o zaključku preiskave je v pristojnosti generalnega direktorja.
The final decision concerning the closure of an investigation remains the responsibility of the Director General.
Člen 1 – točka 4 a a (novo)
Article 1 – point 4 a a (new)
(aa) Odstavek 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(aa) Paragraph 3 is replaced by the following text:
Uslužbenci Urada morajo za vsako preiskavo imeti pisno pooblastilo generalnega direktorja, v katerem sta navedena predmet in namen preiskovanja , pravna podlaga za vodenje preiskave ter pooblastila za preiskovanje, ki izhajajo iz te podlage.“
The Office's employees shall be equipped for each intervention with a written authority issued by the Direc tor Gen eral indicating the subject matter and the purpose of the investigation , the legal bases for conducting the investigation and the investigative powers stemming from those bases . "
Da bi se olajšalo preiskovalno delo za to določenih uslužbencev urada OLAF, je treba predvideti mandat, ki naj se nanaša na predmet in namen preiskave, pravno podlago za vodenje preiskave (pravo Skupnosti in, če je potrebno, nacionalno pravo) ter pooblastila za preiskovanje, ki izhajajo iz te podlage.
In order to facilitate the investigative work of OLAF staff, a written authority should be issued which indicates the subject of the investigation, the legal bases for it (Community law and, where relevant, national law) and the investigative powers for which these legal bases provide.
Člen 1 – točka 4 a b (novo)
Article 1 – point 4 a b (new)
ab) Vstavi se naslednji odstavek:
(ab) The following paragraph is inserted :
Ko uslužbenci Urada, določeni za inšpekcijo ali pregled na kraju samem v skladu s postopkom iz Uredbe (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96, ugotovijo, da eden od gospodarskih subjektov temu nasprotuje, se s tem takoj seznani pristojni organ zainteresirane države članice, ki ga je Urad že prej določil kot kontaktno točko.
Where Office employees nominated to carry out an on-the-spot check or inspection in accordance with the rules laid down in Regulation (Euratom , EC ) No 2185/96 encounter resistance from an economic operator, the competent authority of the Member State concerned (previously identified by the Office as a contact point) shall be informed immediately.
Na zahtevo Urada pristojni organ zainteresirane države članice nudi Uradu pomoč, potrebno za izvedbo preiskave, kot je določeno v mandatu iz odstavka 3.
At the Office's request the competent authority of the Member State concerned shall provide them with the assistance which they require in order to carry out their task, as specified in the written authority referred to in paragraph 3.
Država članica mora zagotoviti, da uslužbenci Urada pod enakimi pogoji kot uslužbenci pristojnega organa in ob spoštovanju nacionalnih zakonov dostopajo do vseh informacij in dokumentacije, ki se nanašajo na dejstva iz člena 1 in ki so potrebne za uspešno izvedbo inšpekcij in pregledov na kraju samem.“
The Member State must ensure that the Office's employees are allowed access (under the same terms and conditions as its competent authorities and in compliance with national law) to all information and documents relating to the facts referred to in Article 1 which prove necessary for the on-the-spot checks and inspections to be carried out satisfactorily. "
Ko Urad pri gospodarskih subjektih naleti na težave pri inšpekcijah in pregledih na kraju samem, je treba uradu OLAF omogočiti, da od države članice zahteva potrebno pomoč v skladu s postopkom iz uredbe 2185/96.
In view of certain difficulties encountered by OLAF in carrying out on-the-spot checks or inspections on the premises of economic operators, it is desirable to permit OLAF to request the necessary assistance from the Member State in accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation 2185/96.
Člen 1 – točka 4 a c (novo)
Article 1 – point 4 – subpoint a c (new)
ac) Odstavek 4 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(a c ) Article 6(4) is replaced by the following:
Med inšpekcijami , pregledi na kraju samem in preiskavami uslužbenci urada ravnajo v skladu s pravili in prakso, ki velja za preiskovalce države članice, s Kadrovskimi predpisi in s sklepi iz drugega pododstavka člena 4(1).
During on-the-spot inspections , […] checks and investigations , the Office’s employees shall adopt an attitude in keeping with the rules and practices governing investigators of the Member State concerned, with the Staff Regulations and with the decisions referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 4(1).
Uslužbenci Urada delujejo v skladu z načelom nepristranskosti.
The Office’s employees shall act in accordance with the principle of impartiality.
Če se v sklopu svoje preiskovalne dejavnosti znajdejo v položaju navzkrižja interesov, o tem nemudoma obvestijo generalnega direktorja.
They shall immediately notify the Direc tor Gen eral if they find themselves in a position of conflict of interest in the context of their investigation.
Generalni direktor odloči, ali gre dejansko za navzkrižje interesov.
The Direc tor Gen eral shall decide whether a conflict of interest exi sts.
Če je potrebno, da navodila za zamenjavo zadevnega uslužbenca.“
If it does the Direc tor Gen eral shall give instructions for replacing the employee.”
Ob upoštevanju prava Skupnosti s tega področja je treba pojasniti, da je izvajanje preiskovalne dejavnosti s strani uslužbenca Urada nezdružljivo z navzkrižjem interesov.
In view of Community case-law on the subject there is a need to make it clear that exercising the investigative duties of an Office employee is incompatible with a conflict of interest.
Gre za načelo, ki je zapisano tudi v pravilniku Urada.
This principle is moreover set out in the Office’s Manual.
Predlog uredbe – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a regulation– amending act
Člen 1 – točka 4 a d (novo)
Article 1 – point 4 a d (new)
ad) Odstavek 5 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(ad) Paragraph 5 is replaced by the following text:
Trajanje preiskav mora biti sorazmerno okoliščinam in kompleksnosti primera.
Investigations shall be conducted continuously over a period which must be proportionate to the circumstances and complexity of the case.
Uslužbenci Urada morajo voditi preiskavo tako, da se ohranijo in zavarujejo vsi dokazi.
Employees of the Office must ensure that the investigation is conducted in accordance with procedures which will enable items of evidence to be safeguarded and preserved.
Če obstaja nevarnost, da dokazi izginejo, lahko od pristojnega organa zainteresirane države članice zahtevajo, da v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo sprejme vse potrebne izvedbene ukrepe ter ukrepe za zavarovanje interesov Unije.“
If necessary (where there is a risk that items of evidence will disappear) they may asked the competent authority of the Member State concerned to take (in accordance with its internal law) any necessary pr ecautionary or implementing measure s. "
Ker je preiskovalna dejavnost urada OLAF pogosto pripravljalna faza za nacionalne postopke, ki sledijo, in ker je eden od razlogov za neupoštevanje priporočil urada OLAF pomanjkanje dokazov, je treba pojasniti, da mora urad OLAF voditi preiskavo hitro in z namenom, da se dokazi ohranijo, da se ne škodi nacionalnemu pravu ter v skladu z določbami prava Skupnosti (uredba 2185/96)
As OLAF's investigative work often constitutes a preparatory stage to be followed by national follow-up procedures, and as the grounds for refusing to act on OLAF's recommendations include a lack of evidence, it is desirable to make it clear that investigations by OLAF should be carried out quickly and with the aim of preserving items of evidence, without prejudice to the national law applicable and in accordance with the provisions of Community law (Regulation 2185/96).
Člen 1 – točka 4 b
Article 1 – point 4 b
Člen 6 – odstavek 5 a – alinea 1
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a – subparagraph 1
Takoj ko preiskava pokaže, da bi lahko bil član, vodilni delavec, uradnik, uslužbenec ali druga oseba v službi institucije, organa, urada ali agencije, vpleten, ali da bi lahko bilo primerno sprejeti previdnostne ali upravne ukrepe za varovanje interesov Unije, se zadevna institucija , organ, urad ali agencija obvesti o preiskavi v teku.
As soon as investigations reveal that a member, manager, official, servant or any other person serving an institution, body, office or agency may be implicated or show that it might be appropriate to take precautionary or administrative measures to protect the interests of the Union, the institution, body, office or agency concerned shall be informed of the investigation in progress.
Poslani podatki vključujejo naslednje:
The information supplied shall include the following:
Takoj ko preiskava pokaže, da bi lahko bil član, vodilni delavec, uradnik, uslužbenec ali druga oseba v službi institucije, organa, urada ali agencije, vpleten, ali da bi lahko bilo primerno sprejeti previdnostne ali upravne ukrepe za varovanje interesov Unije, Urad v najkrajšem času obvesti zadevno institucijo , organ, urad ali agencijo o preiskavi v teku.
As soon as investigations reveal that a member, manager, official, servant or any other person serving an institution, body, office or agency may be implicated or show that it might be appropriate to take precautionary or administrative measures to protect the interests of the Union, the Office shall inform the institution, body, office or agency concerned without delay of the investigation in progress.
a) istovetnost osebe ali oseb, ki so predmet preiskave, ter povzetek zadeve;
(a) the identity of the person or persons under investigation and a summary of the facts in question;
b) vse podatke, ki bi lahko instituciji, organu, uradi ali agenciji pomagali pri odločanju, ali je treba sprejeti upravne ukrepe za zavarovanje interesov Unije;
(b) any information that may assist the institution, body, office or agency in deciding whether it is appropriate to take precautionary or administrative measures in order to protect the interests of the Union;
b) vse podatke, ki bi lahko instituciji, organu, uradi ali agenciji pomagali pri odločanju, ali je treba sprejeti upravne ukrepe za zavarovanje interesov Unije ter, če je potrebno, navodila o rokih za sprejetje upravnih ukrepov ali ukrepov za zavarovanje interesov Unije ;
(b) any information that may assist the institution, body, office or agency in deciding whether it is appropriate to take precautionary or administrative measures in order to protect the interests of the Union , and where approp ria te some indication regarding the timing of precautionary or administrative measures ;
c) morebitne priporočene posebne ukrepe za varstvo zaupnosti.
(c) any special measures of confidentiality recommended.
Treba je zagotoviti, da se informacije o vpletenosti uslužbencev zadevne institucije sporočijo v najkrajšem možnem času.
It is desirable to ensure that information concerning the involvement of officials is communicated to the institution concerned as soon as possible.
Prav tako je treba predvideti možnost, da urad OLAF posreduje napotke o rokih za sprejetje upravnih ukrepov ali ukrepov za zavarovanje interesov Unije.
It is also desirable to enable OLAF to provide indications concerning the time limits within which precautionary or administrative measures must be taken.
Člen 6 – odstavek 5 a – alinea 1 a (novo)
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Obveščanje zadevne institucije, organa ali urada se lahko odloži v primerih, ko je treba zaradi preiskave ohraniti popolno tajnost ali ko je treba uporabiti preiskovalne postopke, ki so v pristojnosti nacionalnih sodnih organov v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za preiskave.
The provision of this information to the institution, body, office or agency may be deferred in cases requiring absolute secrecy to be maintained for the purposes of the investigation or requiring recourse to investigative procedures under the competence of a Member State's judicial authority, in accordance with national law applicable to investigations.
Generalni direktor utemeljuje svojo odločitev na podlagi člena 14(2).
The Direc tor Gen eral shall give reasons for his decision pursuant to Article 14(2).
Treba je predvideti možnost, da Urad ne posreduje informacije takoj, kar je predvideno v pododstavku 2 starega členu 4(5).
OLAF should be permitted to defer the provision of information as provided for in the former Article 4(5)(2).
Člen 6 – odstavek 5 a – alinea 2
Article 6 – paragraph 5a – subparagraph 2
Institucija, organ, urad ali agencija odloči, ali so potrebni morebitni previdnostni ali upravni ukrepi, z ustreznim upoštevanjem pomena jamčenja učinkovitosti vodenja preiskave in posebnih ukrepov za varstvo zaupnosti, ki jih je predlagal Urad.
The institution, body, office or agency shall decide whether any precautionary or administrative measures are appropriate, with due account being taken of the importance of guaranteeing the effectiveness of the conduct of the investigation and of the specific confidentiality measures recommended by the Office.”
Institucija, organ, urad ali agencija odloči, ali so potrebni morebitni previdnostni ali upravni ukrepi, z ustreznim upoštevanjem pomena jamčenja učinkovitosti vodenja preiskave in posebnih ukrepov za varstvo zaupnosti, ki jih je predlagal Urad.
The institution, body, office or agency shall decide whether any precautionary or administrative measures are appropriate, with due account being taken of the importance of guaranteeing the effectiveness of the conduct of the investigation and of the specific confidentiality measures recommended by the Office.
Institucija, organ ali urad v najkrajšem času seznani Urad s svojo odločitvijo o morebitnem sprejetju ukrepov iz tega člena ali, kadar je to primerno, o potrebi po uvedbi dodatnega disciplinskega postopka v zadevah, za katere so institucija, organ ter urad ali agencija ustrezno pristojni na podlagi kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti.
The institution, body, office or agency shall inform the Office as soon as possible of the decision to take any measures under this Article or, where approp ria te, of the need to initiate an additional disciplinary procedure on matters for which there is such approp ria te competence under the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities.
Dodatni disciplinski postopek se lahko začne po uskladitvi z Uradom.
An additional disciplinary procedure may be initiated after consulting the Office.
Treba je okrepiti pravni okvir za pretok informacij med institucijami in uradom OLAF.
There is a need to tighten up the rules on the flow of information between the institutions and OLAF.
Če institucija ugotovi, da bi morale biti informacije, ki jih posreduje urad OLAF, predmet dodatnega disciplinskega postopka v skladu s posebno pristojnostjo institucije, se o tem obvesti urad OLAF.
If the institution finds that the information forwarded by OLAF should be the subject of an additional disciplinary procedure under the institution’s exclusive competence, OLAF is duly informed.
Če urad OLAF meni, da to ne vpliva na potek njegove preiskave, se sproži disciplinska preiskava, da se pospeši izvajanje disciplinskih ukrepov.
If OLAF considers that this does not interfere with the conduct of its investigation the disciplinary inquiry is initiated to speed up the application of disciplinary measures.
Člen 1 – točka 4 b a (novo)
Article 1 – point 4 b a)
Člen 6 – odstavek 6 – alinea 1 a (novo)
Article 6 - paragraph 6 - subparagraph 1 a (new)
ba) Odstavku 6 se doda pododstavek 1a:
(ba) The following subparagraph 1a is added to paragraph 6:
„Uslužbenci Urada lahko zahtevajo, da pristojni organi tretjih držav sodelujejo pri njihovih preiskavah v skladu z določbami iz sporazumov o sodelovanju, sklenjenih s temi državami.
" Employees of the Office may ask the competent authorities of third countries for assistance in the performance of their duties , pursuant to the provisions of the cooperation agreements concluded with those countries.
Prav tako lahko zahtevajo, da v skladu z določbami iz sklenjenih sporazumov o sodelovanju pri njihovih preiskavah sodelujejo mednarodne organizacije.“
They may also request assistance from international organisations in the performance of their duties , pursuant to the provisions of the agreements concluded with those organisations. "
Ker število zunanjih preiskav na področju zunanje pomoči čedalje bolj narašča, je treba omeniti določbe o pomoči uradu OLAF.
In view of the growing number of external investigations in the field of external assistance, it is desirable to refer to the provisions relating to assistance to OLAF.
To velja tudi za pristojne organe tretjih držav v skladu s sporazumi o sodelovanju, ki so bili sklenjeni z njimi.
This also applies to the competent authorities of third countries, in accordance with the cooperation agreements concluded with them.
Člen 1 – točka 4 c
Article 1 – point 4 c
Če se ugotovi, da preiskave ni mogoče zaključiti v 12 mesecih od njenega začetka, lahko generalni direktor Urada odloči, da bo podaljšal obdobje za največ šest mesecev.
Where it is found that an investigation cannot be closed within 12 months after it has been opened, the Director‑General of the Office may decide to extend the period by up to six months.
Preden sprejme to odločitev, zaprosi za mnenje revizijskega svetovalca iz člena 14.
Before taking this decision, he shall seek an opinion from the Review Adviser referred to in Article 14.