natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Čeprav spada Baltsko morje med najbolj znanstveno raziskovana morska območja na svetu, njegova okoljska raziskovalna skupnost pa ima dostop do številnih programov v sklopu okvirnega programa EU za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (RTR), je očitno, da ni niti čezmejnega raziskovalnega posvetovanja, načrtovanja, usklajevanja in usklajenega delovanja, niti skupno izvajane sheme, zasnovane posebej za reševanje okoljskih izzivov same regije Baltskega morja.
Although the Baltic Sea is one of the most scientifically investigated sea areas in the world and the Baltic Sea environmental research community has access to a number of programmes under the EU RTD Framework Programme, there is clearly a lack of trans-boundary research consultation, planning, coordination and concerted action and currently no jointly implemented scheme exists, that would be specifically tailored to address the environmental challenges of the Baltic Sea region itself.
Osem držav članic EU, ki ležijo ob Baltskem morju (Danska, Estonija, Finska, Nemčija, Latvija, Litva, Poljska in Švedska, v nadaljevanju „sodelujoče države“) je ustanovilo Skupni raziskovalni program za Baltsko morje (BONUS), pri katerem sodeluje tudi Skupnost na podlagi člena 185 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (prejšnji člen 169 Pogodbe ES), da bi dosegle trajno usklajevanje in sodelovanje med svojimi znanstvenimi skupnostmi.
In order to achieve a durable coordination and cooperation among the Baltic Sea Member States´ scientific communities, 8 EU Baltic Sea Member States (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Sweden, from now on the "Participating States") have initiated a Joint Baltic Sea Research Programme (BONUS), with participation of the Community, based on Article 185 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (former Article 169 of the EC Treaty).
Nacionalni raziskovalni programi in dejavnosti sodelujočih držav bodo s programom BONUS povezani v skupni raziskovalni program, ki bo podpiral zlasti raziskovalne in okoljske cilje strategije za regijo Baltskega morja, morske in pomorske strategije ter okvirne direktive o vodah.
BONUS will integrate the national research programmes and activities of the Participating States into a single joint research programme, in particular supporting the research and environmental objectives of the Baltic Sea Strategy, the Marine and Maritime Strategy and the Water Framework Directive.
Eden izmed glavnih ciljev te pobude je pripomoči k zasnovi in oblikovanju evropskega raziskovalnega prostora (ERP) v regiji Baltskega morja.
One of the main purposes of this initiative is to help the establishment and structuring of ERA in the Baltic Sea Region.
Program BONUS bo nadaljevanje prejšnjih programov BONUS ERA-NET (2004–2006) in ERA-NET PLUS (2007–2011) ter bo krepil raven povezanosti in odpravljal meje med nacionalno financiranimi raziskovalnimi sistemi sodelujočih držav.
BONUS will follow-up previous programs BONUS ERA-NET (2004-2006) and ERA-NET PLUS (2007-2011), increasing the level of integration and removing barriers between nationally funded research systems of Participating States.
BONUS naj bi bistveno prispeval k izvajanju omenjene strategije in politike za regijo Baltskega morja.
BONUS is expected to make a significant contribution to the implementation of the above-mentioned Baltic Sea strategies and policies.
Cilji tega programa so skladni s poglavitnim ciljem posebnega programa „Sodelovanje“ Sedmega okvirnega programa, namreč spodbujanjem trajnostnega razvoja, pa tudi s posebnimi cilji okoljskih raziskav, na primer preprečevanjem okoljskih tveganj, upravljanjem morskih okolij, ohranjanjem in trajnostnim upravljanjem naravnih in človeških virov ter biotske raznovrstnosti.
The objectives of BONUS are coherent with the overarching aim of Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) Specific Programme "Cooperation" - namely to contribute to sustainable development - as well as with specific aims of environmental research, inter alia prevention of environmental risks, management of marine environments, conservation and sustainable management of natural and man-made resources and biodiversity.
Sodelujoče države so se dogovorile, da bo posebna izvedbena struktura za BONUS Evropsko gospodarsko interesno združenje, in sicer baltska mreža organizacij za financiranje znanosti (BONUS EEIG) s sedežem v Helsinkih na Finskem.
The Participating States have agreed that the dedicated implementation structure of BONUS will be a European Economic Interest Grouping, namely Baltic Organisations Network for Funding Science (BONUS EEIG), established in Helsinki, Finland.
Poročevalka pozdravlja predlog Komisije za zagotovitev finančnega prispevka v višini do 50 milijonov EUR za celotno dobo trajanja programa BONUS (sedem let).
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal to make a financial contribution of up to € 50 million for the duration of whole BONUS Programme (7 years).
Poudarja, da mora biti izvajanje tega programa kar se da preprosto, hitro in učinkovito ter brez nepotrebnih ovir in birokratskih postopkov.
The rapporteur underlines, that the implementation of BONUS should be as simple, quick and efficient as possible, avoiding unnecessary burdens and red tape.
Poleg tega poudarja, da je pomembno vanj vključiti tudi raziskovalce iz Ruske federacije.
The rapporteur stresses the importance of involvement of researchers from the Russian Federation.
Velik del povodja Baltskega morja leži znotraj Ruske federacije, zato ima pomemben neposredni vpliv na njegov morski ekosistem.
A large part of the Baltic Sea basin lies within boundaries of Russian Federation, thus having a significant direct influence on the ecosystem of the sea.
Raziskovalci iz Ruske federacije so že aktivno sodelovali pri prejšnjih projektih ERA-NET za Baltsko morje in to sodelovanje je treba spodbujati, saj je sodelovanje na področju okolja in raziskav eden izmed temeljev sporazuma o partnerstvu med EU in Rusijo.
Researchers from Russian Federation have been already actively involved in previous ERA-NET Baltic Sea projects and this cooperation should be encouraged, bearing in mind that cooperation in the field of environment and research is one of the cornerstones of EU-Russia partnership agreement.
Predlog Komisije, da bi Skupnost sodelovala v programu BONUS, je tudi v skladu z željo Parlamenta po boljši usklajenosti raziskovalnih dejavnosti med državami članicami in na ravni Skupnosti v skladu s Sedmim okvirnim programom, kot tudi z željo, da ne bi bilo razdrobljenosti in prekrivanja pristojnosti.
The Commission proposal for the participation by the Community in BONUS is also in accordance with the wish of Parliament to improve the coordination of research activities between Member States and on Community level within the scope of FP7 and to avoid fragmentation and overlapping competencies.
Program BONUS si zasluži posebno pozornost, saj je lahko dragocen v prihodnost usmerjen model za druge oblike prihodnjega regionalnega sodelovanja na področju raziskav z evropsko vrednostjo, po vzoru regij Donave, Sredozemskega morja, Severnega morja itd.
BONUS deserves special attention, as it can be a valuable forward-looking model for other forms of future regional research cooperation with common European value, such as those in the regions of the Danube, the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea etc.
Poročevalka se popolnoma strinja s Komisijo, da mora biti ta program in njegova administrativna oblika popolnoma v skladu z načeli Sedmega okvirnega programa.
The rapporteur fully agrees with the Commission, that the BONUS program and its administrative architecture should be fully in line with principles of the Seventh Framework Program.
Prav tako poudarja, da Sedmi okvirni program med drugim za podpiranje različnih ukrepov spodbuja sheme financiranja, ki so fleksibilnejše in nudijo več svobode, ter da je treba udeležencem
The rapporteur also notes, that, inter alia , the Seventh Framework Program encourages funding schemes with more flexibility and freedom, to support the different actions, and that stronger management autonomy should be granted to participants
Sklep št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007-2013), (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str.
Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.
1), uvodna izjava 24. pustiti več avtonomije pri upravljanju, obseg in obliko finančne udeležbe pa bo treba prilagoditi za vsak primer posebej
1), recital 24 and emphasises, that it will be necessary to be able to adjust the scale and form of financial participation on a case-by-case basis
Prav tam, Priloga III. .
Ibid. , Annex III .
Tako moramo za sedanje težave v zvezi s Sedmim okvirnim programom najti prilagojeno rešitev, za vodenje sodelovalnih raziskovalnih projektov pa je več možnosti.
Accordingly, a tailored solution to the present problems within the framework of FP7 is needed and several ways to manage collaborative research projects are possible.
Po mnenju poročevalke je za dva vidika strukture programa BONUS (dvofazni sistem in uporaba skupne blagajne) potreben fleksibilen in posebno oblikovan pristop.
In the view of the rapporteur, two aspects of the structure of BONUS - namely the two phase system and use of common pot - need a flexible and specifically designed approach
Strateška/izvedbena faza
Strategic / implementation phase
Komisija predlaga, da bi bilo treba program izvajati v dveh ločenih fazah („dvofazna struktura“): začetna strateška faza, ki bo trajala dve leti, bo zajemala vzpostavitev posvetovalnih platform za dejavno vključevanje zainteresiranih strani, pripravo strateškega raziskovalnega programa ter nadaljnjo razširitev natančnih načinov izvajanja; nato sledi izvedbena faza, ki bo trajala najmanj pet let, zajemala pa bo objavo najmanj treh skupnih razpisov za financiranje strateško usmerjenih projektov BONUS, ki bodo posebno osredotočeni na cilje pobude.
According to the Commission proposal, BONUS should be implemented in two distinct phases ("two phase structure"): an initial strategic phase, lasting two years, during which appropriate consultation platforms for active stakeholder involvement will be set-up, a Strategic Research Agenda prepared, and precise Implementation Modalities will be further broadened; followed by an implementation phase of a minimum of five years, during which a minimum of three joint calls will be launched in view of funding strategically targeted BONUS Projects specifically addressing the objectives of the initiative.
Poročevalka poudarja, da se nikakor ne sme podcenjevati pomembnosti strateške faze, saj prispeva k ustvarjanju najustreznejše in prilagojene strukture projekta in pomembno prispeva k izvedbeni fazi.
The rapporteur stresses, that the importance of the strategic phase should in any case not be underestimated, because it helps to create the most suitable and tailored architecture of the project and delivers valuable input to the implementation phase.
Vendar je bistveno, da program med prvo in drugo stopnjo izvajanja ne bo nenadno prekinjen, kar bi imelo negativne posledice za samo raziskovalno delo.
However, it is vital that the implementation of the two phase structure should not create an abrupt interruption of the programme between the first and second stage since this would have negative impact on substantial research.
Uporaba dvofazne strukture je novost, saj v programih iz člena 169 (po novem člen 185) ni bila nikoli izvedena.
The use of the two phase structure is a novelty, because it has never been used in Article 169 (new Article 185) programs.
Poročevalka ta novi prilagojeni pristop pozdravlja, tako kot so ga Komisija in sodelujoče države.
The rapporteur accepts in line with the Commission and the Participating States this new tailored approach.
Pozdravlja tudi uspešno izvedbo prejšnjih programov BONUS ERA-NET in ERA-NET PLUS z izjemnimi rezultati in odlično oceno ter dodaja, da lahko na podlagi tega vsekakor predvidevamo, da je mogoče strateško fazo zaključiti v manj kot dveh letih.
The rapporteur also appreciates the success of previous BONUS ERA-NET and ERA-NET PLUS programs, with its remarkable results and excellent evaluation and notes, that it provides a good basis to assume, that the strategic phase can be concluded in less than two years time.
To je bistvenega pomena, saj doba dveh let za izvedbo strateške faze ni povsem združljiva s sedanjim programom.
This is a vital point, since the two years duration of the strategic phase might not be exactly compatible with the current programme.
Rok za zaključek vseh projektov iz programa BONUS, ki so v teku, je konec leta 2011, s tem pa bo nastala časovna vrzel med koncem sedanjega programa ERA-NET PLUS in začetkom izvajanja novega BONUS.
All ongoing BONUS projects are due to end in 2011, thus creating a gap between the end of current ERA-NET PLUS and the start of implementation of the new BONUS.
To pa lahko negativno vpliva na delovanje in potencial raziskovalnih skupin (v tem času 16 skupin z več kot 400 raziskovalcev).
This may have a very negative impact to the functioning and potential of the research groups (currently 16 groups with more than 400 researchers).
Zato poročevalka predlaga racionaliziran prehod iz strateške v izvedbeno fazo z oceno kakovosti strateške faze in morebitnimi predlogi za izboljšave.
As a result, the rapporteur proposes a streamlined transfer from strategic to implementation phase, with assessment of the quality of strategic phase and possible suggestions for improvements.
Predlaga tudi krajši terminski načrt za izvedbo strateške faze, da bi se lahko izvedbena faza začela na začetku leta 2012 ter da bi zmanjšali nevarnost upada znanstvene zmožnosti zaradi poznejšega začetka.
Secondly, the rapporteur suggest a shorter timeframe for the strategic phase, in order to allow the start of implementation phase from the beginning of 2012 and to reduce the risk of shrinkage of scientific capacity due to its late initiation.
Resnična/virtualna skupna blagajna
Real / virtual common pot
V skladu s predlogom Komisije bi morale vse sodelujoče države prispevati v resnično skupno blagajno, iz katere se bodo črpala sredstva za financiranje raziskovalnih dejavnosti.
In the Commission's proposal all participating states are obliged to contribute to a real common pot, out of which the research activities will be funded.
Komisija meni, da je mogoče projekte sodelovanja upravljati in zagotoviti resnično finančno povezovanje z evropsko „dodano vrednostjo“ le na podlagi sistema uporabe resnične skupne blagajne.
In the Commission's view, the use of a real common pot is the one and only way to operate collaborative projects and to ensure true financial integration with European ´added value´.
Z vidika Skupnosti je uporaba skupne blagajne dejansko boljša, vendar obstaja v nekaterih sodelujočih državah možnost pravnih in ustavnih zapletov v zvezi s prenosom finančnih sredstev za raziskave v tujino.
While a common pot, from a Community point of view, is indeed preferable, there might be certain legal and constitutional problems in some Participating States to transfer research funds abroad.
Poročevalka kot možno rešitev predlaga, da naj finančni prispevek Skupnosti in gotovinske prispevke sodelujočih držav za program BONUS na splošno zbira in centralno upravlja BONUS EEIG.
As a possible solution, the rapporteur suggests that the Community financial contribution and the cash contribution of the Participating States to BONUS shall, as a general rule, be pooled and administered centrally by the BONUS EEIG.
Če pa določena sodelujoča država zaradi pravnih ali ustavnih zahtev svojega gotovinskega prispevka ne bi mogla prenesti v skupno blagajno, naj se zagotovi možnost, da ta država gotovinski prispevek uporabi le za nacionalne raziskave.
However, if because of legal or constitutional requirements a Participating State cannot transfer its cash contribution to the common pot, a cash contribution from this Participating State only to domestic research should be a possible solution.
Glede na dosedanje izkušnje in neodvisne ocene skupnih raziskovalnih programov za Baltsko morje (prispevek EU trenutno znaša 32 %) lahko verjamemo, da vzporedna uporaba resnične in virtualne skupne blagajne ne bi ogrozila poglavitnega načela znanstvene odličnosti.
The existing experience, as well as independent observations of Joint Baltic Sea Research programs (currently with 32% EU contribution) give good reason to believe that simultaneous use of real and virtual common pot would not endanger the overarching principle of scientific excellence.
o predlogu odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sodelovanju Skupnosti pri skupnem raziskovalnem in razvojnem programu za Baltsko morje (BONUS-169), ki ga izvaja več držav članic
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on participation by the Community in a Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development Programme (BONUS-169) undertaken by several Member States
Pripravljavka mnenja: Anna Rosbach
Rapporteur: Anna Rosbach
Program BONUS-169 je namenjen krepitvi zmogljivosti držav članic EU, Evropske unije in sodelujočih držav na področju morskih raziskav v Baltskem morju.
The Bonus 169 Programme aims at enhancing the marine research capacity of EU Member States, the European Union and participating countries with regards to the Baltic Sea
Pomembno je bolje razumeti, zakaj je Baltsko morje tako onesnaženo.
It is important that we improve our understanding of why the Baltic Sea is so polluted.
Združitev prizadevanj pri novih študijah je seveda lahko prednost, pripravljavka mnenja pa bi vseeno želela opozoriti na obsežno znanje, ki je kot rezultat večletnih raziskav posameznih držav članic že na voljo.
It can of course be an advantage to join forces when it comes to new studies, but the rapporteur would also like to draw the attention to the large body of knowledge which already exists as a result of research having been carried out by the individual Member States over the years.
Namen programa bi moral med drugim biti združevanje rezultatov teh raziskav, da bi preprečili nepotrebno podvajanje ali prekrivanje že obstoječih raziskav, ter opredelitev novih področij za skupno raziskovanje v okviru programa BONUS.
This programme should i. a. aim at bringing together the results of this research to avoid unnecessary duplication or overlapping of already existing research, as well as locating new areas suitable for common research within the framework of the BONUS-programme.
Da bi razširili bazo znanja, bi bila primerna vključitev Rusije v kakršni koli obliki, saj je ena večjih onesnaževalk Baltskega morja.
In order to broaden this knowledge base, the involvement of Russia under one form or another would be prudent as they are a major contributor to the pollution of the Baltic Sea.
Oblikovalci politik bi morali imeti dostop do znanstveno utemeljenih ocen v zvezi s sedanjo in potencialno gospodarsko, ekološko in družbeno izgubo, ki jo povzročata ekosistemska škoda in izgubljanje biotske raznovrstnosti v Baltskem morju.
It would be relevant for policy makers to have access to scientifically based estimates of both the current and the potential economical, ecological and social losses incurred due to the damages of the ecosystem and the loss of biodiversity in the Baltic Sea.
Poklicni ribiči so ena prvih skupin, ki jih to neposredno zadeva, a še zdaleč niso edini.
Professional fishermen are one of the first groups directly concerned by this, but far from the only one.
Kar zadeva posledice sprememb v Baltskem morju, je treba pri odločbi ohraniti široko področje uporabe.
It is important to keep a broad scope with regards to the consequences of changes in the Baltic Sea
Poleg sektorjev, ki so v besedilu izrecno omenjeni, je treba ohraniti možnost vključevanja drugih sektorjev, kar lahko dosežemo prav s širokim področjem uporabe.
When it comes to involving different sectors, apart from those which are explicitly mentioned in the text it is important to have a broad scope.
Drugi pomembni sektorji so med drugim tudi sektor pomorskega prevoza, kmetijstvo, industrija in pristaniške oblasti.
Other relevant sectors include, without being limited to, the maritime transport sector, agriculture, industry, and port authorities.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti vprašanju balastne vode iz ladij z invazivnimi vrstami, ki lahko ogrozijo naravno ekološko ravnovesje v Baltskem morju.
Special consideration has to be given to the aspect of ballast water from ships containing invasive species which can threaten the natural ecological balance of the Baltic Sea.
V zvezi z ladjami je treba posebno pozornost posvetiti tudi preprečevanju razlitja nafte.
When it comes to ships the prevention of oil spills are also an area that needs a high level of focus.
Tudi projekti, kot je plinovod Severni tok v Baltskem morju, sprožajo vprašanja o kratko- in dolgoročnem učinku gradnje plinovodov v vsem Baltskem morju ali njegovih delih.
Projects like the North Stream-pipe line in the Baltic Sea also raise questions about the potential short- and long term impact of the building of pipelines in all, or parts, of the Baltic Sea.
Zagotoviti je treba, da študij učinka ne bodo izvajale in naročale le zainteresirane strani, ampak jih bodo dopolnjevale tudi neodvisne raziskave.
It underlines the importance of ensuring that impact studies are not only done and commissioned by the interested parties, but are also supplemented by independent research.
ODLOČBA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA o sodelovanju Skupnosti pri skupnem raziskovalnem in razvojnem programu za Baltsko morje ( BONUS-169 ), ki ga izvaja več držav članic
DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on participation by the Community in a Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development programme ( BONUS-169 ) undertaken by several Member States
ODLOČBA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA o sodelovanju Skupnosti pri skupnem raziskovalnem in razvojnem programu za Baltsko morje ( BONUS ), ki ga izvaja več držav članic
DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on participation by the Community in a Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development programme ( BONUS ) undertaken by several Member States
(Sprememba bo veljala za vse besedilo.)
(The modification will apply throughout the text.)
(5) Znanost lahko prispeva k reševanju teh izzivov in iskanju rešitev za okoljske težave v Baltskem morju.
(5) Science can contribute to addressing these challenges and finding solutions to the environmental problems in the Baltic Sea.
Vendar je zaradi resnosti sedanjega stanja treba kakovostno in količinsko okrepiti zdajšnje raziskave v baltski regiji z razvojem in izvedbo v celoti povezanega pristopa, s katerim se lahko zadevni raziskovalni programi vseh držav, ki mejijo na Baltsko morje, racionalizirajo in osredotočijo na zapletena in nujna vprašanja, da bi se na njih usklajeno, učinkovito in uspešno odgovorilo.
However, the gravity of the present situation calls for a qualitative and quantitative stepping up of current research in the Baltic region through the development and implementation of a fully-integrated approach whereby the relevant research programmes of all the bordering States can be streamlined and focused in order to address the complex and urgent issues in a coordinated, efficient and effective manner.
(5) Znanost mora prispevati k reševanju teh izzivov in iskanju rešitev za pereče okoljske težave v Baltskem morju.
(5) Science must contribute to addressing these challenges and finding solutions to the urgent environmental problems in the Baltic Sea.
(9 a) na splošno programa BONUS ERA-NET in ERA-NET PLUS dobro delujeta in je torej pomembno zagotoviti neprekinjen tok raziskovalnih prizadevanj, da bomo lahko obravnavali pereče okoljske izzive;
(9 a) By and large, BONUS ERA-NET and ERA-NET PLUS have worked well and it is thus important to ensure the continuity of the research efforts in order to address the pressing environmental challenges.