natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju člena 3(4) Akta o pristopu Republike Bolgarije in Romunije, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0155/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0155/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0269/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0269/2007 ),
Akt o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije iz leta 2005
The 2005 Act of accession of Bulgaria and Romania
UL L 157, 2005, str.
OJ 2005, L 157, p.
Priloga I k Aktu o pristopu vsebuje seznam sedmih konvencij in zadevnih protokolov na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev, vključno s Konvencijo z dne 17. junija 1998, pripravljeno na podlagi člena K.3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, o prepovedi vožnje.
Annex I to the Act of Accession gives the list of the seven conventions and protocols concerned in the Justice and Home Affairs area, including the Convention of 17 June 1998, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on driving disqualifications.
Da bi konvencija začela veljati za Bolgarijo in Romunijo, mora Svet le sprejeti sklep, ki določa datum začetka veljavnosti konvencije.
To make the Convention enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania, the Council should only adopt a decision determining the date on which the Convention shall enter into force.
Namen priporočila Komisije za sklep Sveta je zgolj prilagoditev navedene konvencije zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije v skladu s členom 3(4) akta o pristopu.
This Commission Recommendation for a Council Decision is only intended to make the adjustments required by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the aforementioned Convention, in accordance with Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession.
Pristop Bolgarije in Romunije h Konvenciji z dne 17. junija 1998 o prepovedi vožnje
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 17 June 1998 on driving disqualifications
o predlogu Direktive Sveta o ugotavljanju in določanju evropske ključne infrastrukture ter o oceni potrebe za izboljšanje njenega varovanja
on the proposal for a Council directive on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................26
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............28
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................38
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............41
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................52
OPINION of the Committee on TRANSPORT AND TOURISM ................................55
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0787 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0787 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0053/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0053/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta s 1. in 2. decembra 2005 o načelih za evropski program o ključni infrastrukturi,
– having regard to the Council Conclusions of 1-2 December 2005 on the principles for a European Programme on Critical Infrastructures,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. junija 2005 Evropskemu svetu in Svetu o varovanju kritične infrastrukture v okviru boja proti terorizmu
- having regard to its recommendation of 7 June 2005 to the European Council and to the Council on the protection of critical infrastructure in the framework of the fight against terrorism
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0270/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0270/2007 ),
Predlog Direktive Sveta o ugotavljanju in določanju evropske ključne infrastrukture ter o oceni potrebe za izboljšanju njenega varovanja
Proposal for a directive of the Council on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection
Predlog Direktive Sveta o ugotavljanju in določanju prednostnih sektorjev evropske ključne infrastrukture ter o oceni potrebe za izboljšanju njenega varovanja
Proposal for a directive of the Council on the identification and designation of priority sectors with European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection
Evropski seznam, na katerem bi bila na enem mestu zbrana vsa ključna infrastruktura, ne bi smel obstajati v takšni obliki.
A European list of critical infrastructure should not be produced in this aggregated form.
(2) Komisija je 17. novembra 2005 sprejela Zeleno knjigo o evropskem programu za varovanje ključne infrastrukture, v kateri so bile navedene politične možnosti za oblikovanje programa in informacijskega omrežja za opozarjanje o ključni infrastrukturi (CIWIN).
(2) On 17 November 2005 the Commission adopted a Green Paper on a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection which provided policy options on the establishment of the programme and the Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN).
Prejeti odgovori na Zeleno knjigo so jasno pokazali potrebo po vzpostavitvi okvira Skupnosti glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture.
The responses received to the Green Paper clearly showed the need to set up a Community framework concerning critical infrastructure protection.
Priznana je bila potreba po povečanju zmogljivosti varovanja ključne infrastrukture v Evropi in po pomoči pri zmanjšanju šibkih točk glede ključnih infrastruktur.
The need to increase the critical infrastructure protection capability in Europe and to help reduce vulnerabilities concerning critical infrastructures was acknowledged.
Poudarjen je bil pomen načela subsidiarnosti in dialoga med zainteresiranimi stranmi.
The importance of the principle of subsidiarity and of stakeholder dialogue was emphasised.
Prejeti odgovori na Zeleno knjigo so izpostavili možno dodano vrednost okvira Skupnosti glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture.
The responses received to the Green Paper underlined the possible added value of a Community framework concerning critical infrastructure protection.
Poudarjen je bil pomen ključnih načel subsidiarnosti , sorazmernosti in dopolnjevanja kot tudi dialoga med zainteresiranimi stranmi.
The importance of the key principles of subsidiarity , proportionality and complementarity as well as of stakeholder dialogue was emphasised.
Stvarnejši zapis.
More in line with reality.
(3) Decembra 2005 je Svet za pravosodje in notranje zadeve pozval Komisijo, naj poda predlog za Evropski program za varovanje ključne infrastrukture (EPCIP) in odločil, da mora ta predlog temeljiti na pristopu upoštevanja vseh nevarnosti s prednostno nalogo preprečevanja groženj terorizma.
(3) In December 2005 the Justice and Home Affairs Council called upon the Commission to make a proposal for a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP) and decided that it should be based on an all-hazards approach while countering threats from terrorism as a priority.
V skladu s tem pristopom je treba upoštevati človeške, tehnološke grožnje in naravne nesreče v postopku varovanja ključne infrastrukture, grožnja terorizma pa mora biti na prvem mestu.
Under this approach, manmade, technological threats and natural disasters should be taken into account in the critical infrastructure protection process , but the threat of terrorism should be given priority.
Če se ugotovi, da je stopnja varnostnih ukrepov zoper posebej nevarno grožnjo v sektorju ključne infrastrukture ustrezna, se morajo zainteresirane strani osredotočiti na druge grožnje, ki so jim izpostavljene .
If the level of protection measures against a particular high level threat is found to be adequate in a critical infrastructure sector, stakeholders should concentrate on other threats to which they are still vulnerable .
V skladu s tem pristopom je treba v postopku varovanja ključne infrastrukture upoštevati človeške, tehnološke grožnje in naravne nesreče , kot tudi evidentirati strukturno pogojene grožnje .
Under this approach, manmade, technological threats and natural disasters should be taken into account in the critical infrastructure protection process, while structurally determined threats must also be recorded .
Grožnja terorizma pa mora vseeno biti na prvem mestu.
The threat of terrorism should, however, be given priority.
(4) Glavna odgovornost glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture je zdaj v rokah držav članic in lastnikov/upravljavcev ključnih infrastruktur.
(4) The primary responsibility for protecting critical infrastructures currently falls on the Member States and the owners/operators of critical infrastructures.
To se ne sme spremeniti.
This should not change.
(4) Glavna in končna odgovornost glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture je v rokah držav članic in lastnikov/upravljavcev ključnih infrastruktur.
(4) The primary and ultimate responsibility for protecting critical infrastructures falls on the Member States and the owners/operators of critical infrastructures.
Glede na to, da državne službe najbolje poznajo razmere v svojih državah, bi se pri evropski ključni infrastrukturi veljalo ravnati po pristopu „od spodaj navzgor“.
Bearing in mind that national services know best what is happening in their countries, a bottom-up approach towards European Critical Infrastructure (ECI) should therefore be taken.
(4a) Varovanje ključnih infrastruktur je bistvenega pomena za notranjo varnost Evropske unije in blaginjo njenih državljanov.
(4a) The protection of critical infrastructure is of vital significance for internal security in the EU and for the well-being of its citizens.
Končno lahko uničenje ali okvara nekaterih infrastruktur uniči človeška življenja, okolje in gospodarske dobrine ter trajno škoduje zaupanju javnosti v državno zaščito in socialno skrbstvo.
In the final analysis, destroying or disrupting certain infrastructure can wreck human lives, the environment and economic assets as well as cause lasting damage to public confidence in State protection and care.
Poudariti je treba vplive uničenja ali okvare nekaterih infrastruktur.
The effects of destroying or disrupting certain infrastructure must be emphasised.
Nenazadnje je mogoče določila iz predloga direktive upravičiti zgolj z možnimi posledicami oziroma njihovim preprečevanjem.
In the final analysis, it is only the possible consequences and/or the avoidance of these consequences that justify the measures contained in the draft directive.
V Skupnosti obstaja določeno število ključnih infrastruktur, katerih okvara ali uničenje bi vplivala na dve ali več držav članic ali na državo članico , v kateri se takšna infrastruktura ne nahaja.
There are a certain number of critical infrastructures in the Community, the disruption or destruction of which would affect two or more Member States or a Member State other than that in which the critical infrastructure is located.
To lahko vključuje čezmejne medsektorske vplive, ki izhajajo iz soodvisnosti med medsebojno povezano infrastrukturo.
This may include transboundary cross-sector effects resulting from interdependencies between interconnected infrastructure.
Takšno evropsko ključno infrastrukturo je treba ugotoviti in določiti s skupnim postopkom.
Such European critical infrastructures should be identified and designated by means of a common procedure.
Potrebo za izboljšanje varovanja takšnih ključnih infrastruktur je treba oceniti v skladu s skupnim okvirom .
The need to improve the protection of such critical infrastructures should be assessed under a common framework.
Dvostranske sheme za sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju varovanja ključne infrastrukture pomenijo uveljavljen in učinkovit način za ravnanje s čezmejno ključno infrastrukturo.
Bilateral schemes for cooperation between Member States in the field of critical infrastructure protection constitute a well established and efficient means of dealing with transboundary critical infrastructure.
EPCIP mora temeljiti na takšnem sodelovanju.
EPCIP should build on such cooperation.
(5) V Skupnosti obstaja določeno število ključnih infrastruktur, katerih okvara ali uničenje bi vplivala na tri ali več držav članic ali na vsaj dve državi članici , v katerih se takšna infrastruktura ne nahaja.
(5) There are a number of critical infrastructures in the Community, the disruption of which would affect three or more Member States or at least two other Member States other than that in which the critical infrastructure is located.
Takšno evropsko ključno infrastrukturo je treba ugotoviti s skupnim postopkom.
Such European critical infrastructure should be identified by means of a common procedure .
Na podlagi skupnih meril je treba sestaviti seznam prednostnih sektorjev s ključnimi evropskimi infrastrukturami.
On the basis of common criteria a list of priority sectors with European critical infrastructure should be drawn up.
Varovanje takšnih ključnih infrastruktur je treba opredeliti v skladu s skupnim okvirom ravnanja, ki bo države članice zavezoval, da s sprejetjem ustreznih ukrepov zmanjšajo možne nevarnosti za ključne infrastrukture na svojem ozemlju .
A common action framework should be laid down for the protection of such European critical infrastructures that puts Member States in a position to reduce the potential danger to critical infrastructure on their territory by taking appropriate measures.
EPCIP mora temeljiti na takšnem sodelovanju.
EPCIP should build on such cooperation .
(5a) V določenih sektorjih je že veliko ukrepov, ki urejajo ugotavljanje, določanje in varovanje ključne infrastrukture.
(5a) A series of measures governing the identification, designation and protection of critical infrastructures already exists for some sectors.
Morebitna prihodnja ureditev na ravni Skupnosti ne sme voditi v podvajanje predpisov v teh sektorjih, ne da bi se povečala varnost.
Any future Community-wide regulation should not result in duplicate regulation in these sectors in the absence of added security.
(6) Ker imajo različni sektorji posebne izkušnje, strokovno znanje in zahteve glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture, je treba oblikovati pristop Skupnosti za varovanje ključne infrastrukture in ga izvajati ob upoštevanju sektorskih posebnosti in obstoječih sektorskih ukrepov na ravni EU in nacionalni ter regionalni ravni in po potrebi tudi obstoječe čezmejne medsebojne dogovore glede pomoči med lastniki/upravljavci ključne infrastrukture.
(6) Since various sectors have particular experience, expertise and requirements concerning critical infrastructure protection, a Community approach to critical infrastructure protection should be developed and implemented taking into account sector specificities and existing sector based measures including those already existing at EU, national or regional level, and where relevant cross-border mutual aid agreements between owners/operators of critical infrastructure already in place.
Glede na zelo pomembno vključenost zasebnega sektorja pri nadzoru in upravljanju tveganj, načrtovanju neprekinjenosti delovanja in obnovi po nesrečah, bo pristop Skupnosti moral spodbuditi polno vključenost zasebnega sektorja.
Given the very significant private sector involvement in overseeing and managing risks, business continuity planning and post-disaster recovery, a Community approach will need to encourage full private sector involvement.
Potrebno je oblikovanje skupnega seznama sektorjev ključne infrastrukture, da se olajša izvajanje pristopa za varovanje ključne infrastrukture po posameznih sektorjih.
The establishment of a common list of critical infrastructure sectors is necessary in order to facilitate the implementation of the sector-by-sector approach to critical infrastructure protection.
Glede na zelo pomembno vključenost zasebnega sektorja pri nadzoru in upravljanju tveganj, načrtovanju neprekinjenosti delovanja in obnovi po nesrečah, bi pristop Skupnosti moral zagotoviti polno vključenost zasebnega sektorja.
Given the very significant private sector involvement in overseeing and managing risks, business continuity planning and post-disaster recovery, a Community approach should ensure full private sector involvement.
Potrebno je oblikovanje skupnega seznama sektorjev ključne infrastrukture, da se olajša izvajanje pristopa za varovanje evropske ključne infrastrukture po posameznih sektorjih.
The establishment of a common list of critical infrastructure sectors is necessary in order to facilitate the implementation of the sector-by-sector approach to European critical infrastructure protection.
Glede na to, da je večina ključne infrastrukture v zasebni lasti in upravi, bi moral pristop EU v celoti vključevati zasebni sektor in biti – ob upoštevanju sektorskih značilnosti – oblikovan na podlagi obstoječih sektorskih varnostnih ukrepov.
As most critical infrastructure is privately owned and operated, the EU approach should fully involve the private sector and be built on existing sector-based protection measures, taking into account sector characteristics.
(6a) Ključna infrastruktura mora biti oblikovana tako, da se zmanjša število povezav s tretjimi državami in lokalizacija v teh državah .
(6a) Critical infrastructure should be designed in a way that minimises any links with and localisation in third countries.
Lokalizacija elementov ključnih infrastruktur zunaj Evropske unije povečuje tveganje za teroristične napade z razpršenimi vplivi na celotno infrastrukturo, tveganje za dostop teroristov do podatkov, hranjenih zunaj Evropske unije, in tveganje za neskladnost z zakonodajo Skupnosti, kar bi ogrozilo celotno infrastrukturo .
The localisation of elements of critical infrastructures outside the European Union increases the risk of terrorist attacks with spill-over effects on the whole infrastructure, access by terrorists to data stored outside the European Union, as well as risks of non-compliance with Community legislation, thus rendering the entire infrastructure more vulnerable .
Nedavni primer sistema SWIFT je pokazal, da je treba ključne podatke zavarovati pred nezakonito uporabo tujih organov ali zasebnih akterjev.
The recent SWIFT case showed that critical data needs to be protected against illegal use by foreign authorities or private actors.
(7) Vsak lastnik/upravljavec evropske ključne infrastrukture mora oblikovati varnostni načrt upravljavca, v katerem bodo ugotovljene ključne infrastrukturne zmogljivosti in navedene ustrezne varnostne rešitve za varovanje teh infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti.
(7) Each owner/operator of European critical infrastructure should establish an Operator Security Plan identifying critical assets and laying down relevant security solutions for their protection.
Varnostni načrt upravljavca mora upoštevati oceno šibkih točk, groženj in tveganj, kot tudi vse ostale zadevne informacije, ki jih zagotovijo organi države članice.
The Operator Security Plan should take into account vulnerability, threat and risk assessments, as well as other relevant information provided by Member State authorities.
Varnostne načrte upravljavcev je treba posredovati kontaktnim točkam za varovanje ključne infrastrukture v državah članicah.
These Operator Security Plans should be forwarded to the CIP Contact Point in the Member States.
Za izpolnitev zahteve po vzpostavitvi in posodabljanju varnostnega načrta upravljavca bi lahko zadoščala skladnost z obstoječimi sektorskimi varnostnimi ukrepi.
Compliance with existing sector-based protection measures could satisfy the requirement to establish and update an Operator Security Plan.
(8) Vsak lastnik/upravljavec evropske ključne infrastrukture mora imenovati varnostnega uradnika za zvezo, da se olajša sodelovanje in komunikacija med zadevnimi organi varovanja nacionalne ključne infrastrukture.
(8) Each owner/operator of European critical infrastructure should designate a Security Liaison Officer in order to facilitate cooperation and communication with relevant national critical infrastructure protection authorities.
Za izpolnitev zahteve po imenovanju varnostnega uradnika za zvezo bi lahko zadoščala skladnost z obstoječimi sektorskimi varnostnimi ukrepi.
Compliance with existing sector-based protection measures could satisfy the requirement to designate a Security Liaison Officer.
Pristop Skupnosti bi moral biti – ob upoštevanju sektorskih značilnosti – oblikovan na podlagi obstoječih sektorskih varnostnih ukrepov .
The Community approach should be built on existing sector-based protection measures, taking into account sector characteristics.
Za vsako ceno bi se bilo treba izogniti navzkrižjem ali podvajanjem .
Contradictions or duplications should be avoided at all costs.
(10) Da se olajša izboljšanje varovanja evropskih ključnih infrastruktur, je treba razviti skupne metodologije za ugotavljanje in razvrščanje šibkih točk , groženj in tveganj za infrastrukturne zmogljivosti.
(10) In order to facilitate improvements in the protection of European critical infrastructures, common methodologies should be developed for the identification and classification of vulnerabilities, threats and risks to infrastructure assets.
(10) Da se olajša izboljšanje varovanja evropskih ključnih infrastruktur, je treba razviti in izvajati skupne metodologije za ugotavljanje in razvrščanje groženj in tveganj ter strukturnih šibkih točk za infrastrukturne zmogljivosti.
(10) In order to facilitate improvements in the protection of European critical infrastructures, common methodologies should be developed and implemented for the identification and classification of threats and risks to , and structural vulnerabilities affecting infrastructure assets.
Predlog spremembe uvaja potrebno opredelitev.
Need to be more specific.
(11) Samo skupni okvir lahko zagotovi potrebno podlago za usklajeno izvajanje ukrepov za varovanje evropske ključne infrastrukture in jasno določi odgovornosti vseh zadevnih zainteresiranih strani .
(11) Only a common framework can provide the necessary basis for a coherent implementation of measures to protect European critical infrastructure and clearly define the respective responsibilities of all relevant stakeholders.
Lastnikom /upravljavcem evropske ključne infrastrukture mora biti omogočen dostop do najboljših praks in metodologij glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture.
Owners/operators of European critical infrastructure should be given access to best practices and methodologies concerning critical infrastructure protection.
(11) Z določitvijo odgovornosti vseh zadevnih zainteresiranih strani lahko skupni okvir zagotovi potrebno podlago za usklajeno izvajanje ukrepov za varovanje evropske ključne infrastrukture.
(11) By defining the respective responsibilities of all relevant stakeholders a common framework can provide the necessary basis for a coherent implementation of measures to protect European critical infrastructure.
Državam članicam in lastnikom /upravljavcem evropske ključne infrastrukture mora biti omogočen dostop do najboljših praks in metodologij glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture.
Member States and Owners/operators of European critical infrastructure should be given access to best practices and methodologies concerning critical infrastructure protection.
Prvotni zapis uvodne izjave je premočan.
Wording of original recital is too strong.
(12) Učinkovita zaščita ključne infrastrukture zahteva komunikacijo, usklajevanje in sodelovanje na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti.
(12) Effective protection of critical infrastructure requires communication, coordination, and cooperation at national and Community level s .