natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog zadeva razveljavitev osmih direktiv Sveta o meroslovju na šestih področjih z namenom poenostavitve evropske zakonodaje:
The proposal concerns the repeal of 8 Council Directives on metrology in 6 sectors, with the aim to simplify the acquis of European law:
- Direktiva 75/33/EGS o vodomerih za hladno vodo za surovo vodo,
- Directive 75/33/EEC on Cold Water Meters for Non-Clean Water;
- Direktivi 76/765/EGS in 76/766/EGS o alkoholometrih in alkoholnih tablicah,
- Directives 76/765/EEC and 76/766/EEC on Alcohol Meters and Alcohol Tables;
- Direktivi 71/317/EGS in 74/148/EGS o utežeh srednje točnosti in utežeh nad srednjo točnostjo,
- Directives 71/317/EEC and 74/148/EEC on Medium and Above-Medium Accuracy Weights respectively;
- Direktiva 86/217/EGS o merilnikih zračnega tlaka v plašču motornih vozil,
- Directive 86/217/EEC on Tyre Pressure Gauges for Motor Vehicles;
- Direktiva 71/347/EGS o masi žita,
- Directive 71/347/EEC on Standard Mass of Grain;
- Direktiva 71/349/EGS o umerjanju ladijskih cistern.
- Directive 71/349/EEC on Calibration of Ship Tanks.
Stališče poročevalke
Position Rapporteur
Poročevalka podpira boljšo pravno ureditev, ki je splošni cilj.
The rapporteur favours the general objective of better regulation.
Pri tem predlogu pa ni popolnoma jasno, katera je najboljša možnost.
However, with regard to this proposal it is not that clear what the best option will be.
Komisija v svoji oceni učinka pri pregledovanju različnih možnosti v zvezi s temi osmimi direktivami o meroslovju (popolna razveljavitev, razveljavitev s pogoji, neukrepanje) ugotavlja, da nobena od možnosti ne izstopa.
The Commission concludes in their Impact Assessment, when looking at the different options concerning these 8 metrology Directives (full repeal, repeal with conditions, do nothing), that "no option stands out".
Zaradi boljše pravne ureditve pa Komisija namesto usklajevanja (ponovna ureditev v okviru direktive o merilnih instrumentih) podpira popolno razveljavitev vseh direktiv (in računa na medsebojno priznavanje nacionalnih ureditev).
Still, for reasons of better regulation, the Commission favours the full repeal of all Directives (and relies on mutual recognition of national regulation) above harmonisation (i.e. re-regulation in MID).
Poročevalka meni, da bi morale imeti države članice na voljo več časa, da bi preučile, ali bo razveljavitev direktiv povzročila pravno negotovost, kar bi pomenilo, da je uskladitev predpisov na evropski ravni nujna.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that Member States should be given more time to investigate whether repealing the Directives will lead to legal uncertainty which makes European harmonisation of rules necessary.
Zato poročevalka podpira razveljavitev direktiv, pod pogojem, da je v okviru širšega pregleda direktive o merilnih instrumentih (2004/22/EC) kot osnovnega pravnega instrumenta na tem področju na voljo dovolj časa za analizo možnih posledic .
Therefore the rapporteur opts for a solution where the Directives will be repealed, but also provides sufficient time to analyse the possible consequences in context with the broader review of the basic legal instrument in this field, the "Measurement Instruments Directive" (2004/22/EC).
Stališče Komisije
Position Commission
Komisija predlaga razveljavitev osmih direktiv o meroslovju, ker so zastarele in jih je zaradi boljše pravne ureditve mogoče razveljaviti.
The Commission proposes to repeal these 8 Metrology Directives, because they are obsolete and can be repealed for reasons of better regulation.
Poleg tega ni vidnih ovir za prosti pretok, prav tako pa ni znakov o skupni potrebi po višji ravni varstva potrošnikov.
No problems for free movement are apparent and there is no evidence of a common need for a higher level of consumer protection.
Pričakovati je, da bo veliko držav članic uporabilo člen 2 direktive 2004/22/ES in bo izkoristilo možnost neudeležbe pri usklajevanju (opt-out).
In addition, a substantial number of Member States are expected to make use of Article 2 of Directive 2004/22/EC and will opt-out of the harmonisation.
Zato se razširitev področja uporabe direktive o merilnih instrumentih ne zdi primerna.
As a result, extending the scope of the MID does not appear appropriate.
Stališče Sveta
Position Council
Medtem ko Svet močno podpira poenostavitev zakonodaje EU, se pojavlja splošna zaskrbljenost, da bi razveljavitev osmih direktiv lahko povzročila pravno praznino, dokler se ne izvede načrtovana revizija direktive o merilnih instrumentih.
While there is broad support in Council for the objective of simplifying the acquis of EU law, there seems to be a general concern that a repeal of these eight Directives could lead to a legal vacuum in the Member States pending the planned review of the MID.
o poenostavitvi SKP
on simplification of the CAP
Poenostavitev SKP
on simplification of the CAP
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. oktobra 2005 o poenostavitvi in boljši ureditvi za skupno kmetijsko politiko ( KOM(2005)0509 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 19 October 2005 - Simplification and Better Regulation for the Common Agricultural Policy ( COM(2005)0509 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 18. marca 2009 z naslovom „Poenostavljena SKP za Evropo – Uspeh za vse“ ( KOM(2009)0128 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 18 March 2009 - A simplified CAP for Europe - a success for all ( COM(2009)0128 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 48 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 48 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0051/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7‑0051/2010 ),
A. ker mora biti vsa zakonodaja sorazmerna z namenom in bi bilo treba pred njenim sprejetjem s celovito presojo vpliva oceniti finančno breme, ki bi ga prinesla ta zakonodaja, ter temeljito preučiti razmerje med stroški in koristmi,
A. whereas all legislation must be proportionate to the objective and should only be introduced after a full impact assessment analysing the financial burden which legislation would impose, and including a full cost benefit analysis, has been carried out,
B. ker bi morala poenostavitev najprej in predvsem koristiti kmetom, ne pa zgolj nacionalnim in plačilnim organom v državah članicah, kot je bilo pretežno opaženo,
B. whereas simplification should benefit farmers first and foremost and not only the national authorities and payment bodies in the Member States, as has been predominantly observed,
C. ker bi morala nova SKP kmetom omogočiti, da se osredotočijo na poglavitni cilj zagotoviti varno in kakovostno hrano, ki ji je mogoče slediti, in jih tudi podpirati pri zagotavljanju netržnih javnih dobrin,
C. whereas a new CAP should allow farmers to concentrate on the core objective of providing safe, quality and traceable food while also supporting them to deliver non‑market public goods,
D. ker bi moral cilj biti zmanjšanje stroškov izvajanja skupne kmetijske politike ob hkratnem zmanjševanju upravnih obremenitev za proizvajalce Skupnosti, s čimer bi se kmetom omogočilo, da več časa obdelujejo svojo zemljo,
D. whereas the objective should be to reduce the implementation costs of the CAP while reducing the administrative burdens on Community producers, to enable farmers to spend more time working their land,
E. ker bi morala biti nova SKP trajno konkurenčna,
E. whereas a new CAP should be sustainably competitive,
F. ker je nujno treba zagotoviti jasno in razumljivo zakonodajo, ki pristojnim organom in kmetom zagotavlja pravno varnost, ter odpraviti nepotrebno zakonodajo,
F. whereas it is necessary to ensure clear and understandable legislation that provides legal certainty for competent authorities and farmers, and to eliminate unnecessary legislation,
G. ker je treba zagotoviti pravično razporeditev enotnega plačila na kmetijo,
G. whereas the distribution of the single farm payment should ensure fairness,
H ker je delujoč pravni okvir nujen za reševanje pomembnih pravnih vprašanj v zvezi s SKP,
H whereas a functional legal framework is necessary to manage the important legal issues involved in the CAP,
I. ker bi morala biti nova SKP bolj tržno usmerjena, v skladu z nedavnimi reformami skupne kmetijske politike, in se osredotočati na zmanjšanje čezmernega protekcionizma, hkrati pa obdržali razpoložljive instrumente za pomoč kmetom v času hude gospodarske negotovosti,
I. whereas a new CAP should be more market-orientated, in line with the recent reforms of the common agricultural policy, and focused on reducing excessive protectionism, while keeping the tools available to assist farmers in times of severe economic volatility,
J. ker mora nova SKP biti enostavnejša in bolj odzivna,
J. whereas the new CAP should be more simple and responsive,
K. ker je potrebna prožnejša zakonodaja, da bo mogoče SKP prilagajati ter upoštevati posebnosti posameznih regij in ozemelj, ne da bi se pri tem ogrozil skupni značaj SKP,
K. whereas legislation should be more flexible, in order to make the CAP adapt to recognise specific regions and territories, without jeopardising the common character of the CAP,
L. ker bi bilo treba spodbujati izmenjavo dobre prakse med državami članicami in lokalnimi oblastmi,
L. whereas the exchange of good practice should be promoted among Member States and local authorities,
M. ker ima skupna kmetijska politika osrednje mesto v EU-27 pri zagotavljanju zadostne oskrbe z varno hrano, poleg tega pa tudi odgovarja na izzive, kot so ohranjanje podeželja, gorskih območij in območij z omejenimi možnostmi, najbolj oddaljenih območij ter multifunkcionalnosti evropskega kmetijstva;
M. whereas the common agricultural policy is of central importance in the EU-27 as a means not only of ensuring an adequate supply of safe food but also of continuing to respond to such challenges as the conservation of rural areas, mountain regions, disadvantaged areas, extremely peripheral areas and the multifunctionality of European agriculture,
4. poziva Komisijo, naj pravila SKP uskladi z odpravo podvajanja nalog in zmanjšanjem birokracije, da bi se povečala konkurenčnost kmetijskega sektorja v vseh državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to harmonise CAP rules by eliminating the duplication of tasks and reducing bureaucracy, with a view to increasing the competitiveness of the agricultural sector in all the Member States;
6. poziva, naj bo SKP osredotočena na cilj in ne na zakonodajo, ter naj države članice in njihove regionalne oblasti kmetom omogočijo več pomoči in svetovanja prek svetovalnih mehanizmov in ustreznih komunikacijskih metod;
Calls for the CAP to be outcome-driven rather than focussed on regulation and for all Member States and their regional authorities to offer more help and advice to farmers through advisory tools and through appropriate communication methods;
13. poudarja, da mora iti poenostavitev SKP z roko v roki z ukrepi informiranja upravičencev, in poziva Komisijo, naj razširi in razvije informacijske ukrepe za skupno kmetijsko politiko;
Stresses that simplification of the CAP must go hand‑in‑hand with information measures for beneficiaries, and calls on the Commission to expand and develop information measures on the common agricultural policy;
16. poudarja, da upravne kazni, vključno z vračilom plačil, ki jih je kmet prejel, ne bi smele temeljiti na okoliščinah, ki jih kmet objektivno nima pod nadzorom, zlasti pa ne na nepredvidljivih dogodkih;
Points out that any administrative fines, including the obligation to pay back any payments obtained by the farmer, should not be based on circumstances objectively beyond the farmer’s control and particularly not on unforeseeable events;
Navzkrižna skladnost
Cross Compliance (CC)
21. vztraja, da morajo države članice v primeru kaznovanja kmetov zaradi neizpolnjevanja predpisov te kazni uporabljati na pregleden, enostaven in sorazmeren način ter ob upoštevanju dejanskega stanja na kraju samem;
Insists that, when Member States apply penalties to farmers for failure to comply with regulations, these penalties must be applied in a transparent, simple and proportionate manner which takes account of the realities on the ground;
29. meni, da morajo vse osebe, ki so funkcionalno ali institucionalno zadolžene za preglede, uskladiti že opravljene ali bodoče preglede v kmetijskih gospodarstvih, da bi tako zmanjšali njihovo število;
Considers that the controls carried out – or due to be carried out – at farms by the various parties whose job or statutory duty it is to conduct them should be coordinated with a view to reducing the number of farm inspection visits;
32. poziva k odobritvi uresničljivega in preglednega sistema kazalnikov, s katerim bi bili instrumenti za ocenjevanje pri inšpekcijskih pregledih v okviru navzkrižne skladnosti preprostejši, ter k odpravi sedanjega sistema oziroma možnosti dva- ali večkratne kazni za eno napako; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči nesorazmerje med kršitvami pri identifikaciji živali, katerih delež znaša približno 70 % vseh kršitev, in drugimi zahtevami, ter naj uvede ustrezne spremembe;
Calls for the authorisation of a practicable and transparent system of indicators with the aim of simplifying the assessment instruments for CC checks and calls for abolition of the current system and of the possibility of two or more penalties being imposed for a single error; calls on the Commission to analyse the disproportion between infringements of animal identification regulations, accounting for some 70% of all infringements, and other requirements and to make appropriate changes;
35. meni, da morajo imeti kmetje dostop do učinkovitih sistemov, ki jim omogočajo, da preprosto in brez nepotrebne birokracije oddajajo vloge za neposredna plačila, praviloma v kraju, kjer bivajo;
Considers that farmers must have access to workable systems that allow them easily and without needless bureaucracy to submit applications for direct payments, typically in the place in which they live;
41. meni, da bi moral prihodnji sistem upoštevati načela poenostavitve ter da bi poenostavitev, preglednost in poštenost morale biti ključne prednostne naloge reforme SKP;
Considers that the future system should take into account the principles of simplification and that simplification, transparency and fairness should be the key priorities of the CAP reform;
47. poudarja, da bi z zmanjšanjem upravnih obremenitev pri spremljanju in poročanju, ki ju morajo izvajati organizacije proizvajalcev v sektorju sadja in zelenjave, te organizacije postale privlačnejše za kmete ter jih spodbudile k združevanju in skupnemu delovanju;
Stresses that a reduction of the administrative burden relating to monitoring and reporting imposed on producer organisations in the fruit and vegetable sector would make these organisations more attractive to farmers and encourage them to associate and act together;
Razvoj podeželja
Rural development
50. meni, da bi bilo treba zakonodajo, ki je v navzkrižju z drugo zakonodajo, urediti pred uveljavitvijo njenih zahtev za kmete (npr. okoljska zakonodaja in sistem enotnih plačil);
Considers that legislation which presents a conflict with other legislation should be regularised before being imposed on the farmer (e.g. environment legislation and single payments scheme);
57. poziva k uvedbi poenostavljenega in usklajenega sistema kazalnikov, ki bi bil lažje razumljiv in uporaben ter bi olajšal primerno ocenjevanje in prispeval k zmanjšanju birokracije,
Calls for the introduction of a simplified and consistent system of indicators, which would implicitly result in greater ease of understanding and application, pertinent evaluations and less bureaucracy;
Identifikacija živali
Animal identification
Upravljanje skupne kmetijske politike je pogosto močno prezapleteno, zato je za celoten kmetijski sektor ključnega pomena, da se ta politika poenostavi in s tem olajša življenje kmetom na točki dostave.
The administration of the Common Agricultural Policy is frequently far too complicated and it is therefore of vital importance to the entire agricultural sector that the policy is simplified and life is made easier for farmers at the point of delivery.
Proces poenostavitve SKP je bistven za večjo konkurenčnost našega kmetijskega gospodarstva, ohranitev in ustvarjanje delovnih mest ter prispevanje k uravnovešenemu razvoju naših podeželskih območij.
The simplification process is essential in order to make our agricultural economy more competitive, to preserve and create jobs and to contribute to the sound development of our rural areas.
Napoved, da bo cilj 25-odstotnega zmanjšanja upravnih bremen dosežen pred letom 2012, ki je bilo določeno v sistematskem pregledu SKP leta 2003, je spodbudna.
It is encouraging to see the target of a 25% reduction in the administrative burden is expected to be reached ahead of 2012, as proposed in the 2003 CAP Health Check.
Kljub temu je to najmanj, kar je treba doseči, zato mora EU v prihodnjih letih stremeti k veliko večjemu zmanjšanju obremenitev naših kmetijskih skupnosti, ki so že tako v nezavidljivem položaju.
However, this is an absolute minimum and the EU must strive to reduce the burden on our hard pressed agricultural communities to a far greater extent in the coming years.
Skupna tržna ureditev, katere namen je bil tehnična poenostavitev z združitvijo mnogoštevilnih sektorskih uredb v eno, v praksi ni koristila niti kmetom, niti uradnikom ali plačilnim agencijam.
The Single CMO, while attempting to deliver technical simplification by combining a multitude of sector specific regulations into one, didn't deliver practical benefits to farmers, administrators or paying agencies.
Zato in zaradi bližajoče se reforme SKP v letu 2013 bi morala biti poenostavitev SKP osrednja tema predlogov za reformo SKP pred letom 2013 in po tem.
Therefore, in the run up to CAP reform in 2013, CAP simplification should be at the heart of CAP reform proposals before and post 2013.
Pravila navzkrižne skladnosti so eden ključnih konceptov pri neposrednih plačilih SKP in zagotavljajo upravičenost plačevanja subvencij kmetom.
Cross Compliance rules are one of the key concepts of CAP direct payments and provide a justification for the payment of subsidies to farmers.
Ključno vlogo imajo tudi pri zagotavljanju, da so evropski kmetijski proizvodi skladni s kar najvišjimi kakovostnimi standardi.
They also play an essential role in ensuring that European agricultural products are of the highest standard possible.
Priporočljivo pa je močno poenostaviti obstoječa pravila.
However, a strong simplification of the existing rules is recommended.
Močno podpiramo načelo enotne uporabe pravil navzkrižne skladnosti po vsej Uniji.
We strongly support the principle of a uniform application of cross compliance rules across the union.
Razumljivo je, da bodo nekatere razlike pri njihovi uporabi v 27 državah članicah, ki se med seboj močno razlikujejo glede na podnebje, vendar je treba povsod, kjer je to mogoče, spodbujati enotno uporabo pravil navzkrižne skladnosti.
It is understood that there will be some variation in application over 27 member states which encompass huge variations in climatic conditions, however wherever possible uniform application of cross compliance rules should be encouraged.
Zlasti pregledi navzkrižne skladnosti bi morali biti „prijaznejši“ do kmetov, ki jih ti zadevajo.
In particular Cross compliance controls should be made more "user friendly" for the farmers involved.
Na primer, predpisane zahteve za upravljanje bi bilo treba bistveno omiliti, če je bilo v predhodnem letu le malo kršitev.
For example, requirements for statutory management requirements should be significantly reduced if there have been only a few infringements in the previous year.
Zahteve bi morale biti „speče“ in uporabljene pri nadzoru navzkrižne skladnosti le, kadar je kršena podobna zahteva v posamezni sektorski ureditvi, kot v primeru živalskih bolezni, ki se ne pojavljajo v nekaterih državah članicah.
The requirements should be "sleeping" and triggered for CC control only when a similar requirement in the specific sector regulation is being infringed, as is the case for animal diseases which are not encountered in certain member states.
Sankcioniranje kršitev mora biti sorazmerno s težo kršitve.
Follow up to infringements must be proportionate to the offence.
Zaenkrat se manjše kršitve navzkrižne skladnosti preganjajo dosledneje kot običajne kršitve.
Currently, there is more persistent follow up on minor infringements to cross compliance rules than on ordinary infringements.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost uporabiti preglede posameznih sektorjev, ki izhajajo iz drugega, izvornega sektorja določenih pravil navzkrižne skladnosti, s čimer bodo lahko ukinile pravila posamezne navzkrižne skladnosti, kadar posamezni sektor že izpolnjuje vse ustrezne zahteve.
Member states should be allowed to use specific sector controls that stem from a different sector where the rules under CC originate in order to abolish the rules of specific CC when a specific sector already covers all relevant requirements.
Število zahtev navzkrižne skladnosti se stalno povečuje, zaradi česar se je zmanjšala njihova sprejetost med kmeti, nacionalnim upravnim organom pa se je naložilo veliko breme.
There has been a tendency for the number of CC requirements to steadily increase, this has reduced the acceptance for the whole concept among farmers and has created considerable burdens for national administrations.
Kar se tiče identificiranja živali, bi bilo treba načeloma uporabljati številko proizvajalca namesto številke gospodarstva.
With regards to animal identification, this should in principle be done using the producer number as opposed to the holding number.
Registracija in identifikacija močno obremenjujeta kmete, zato je treba izkoristiti vse možnosti za poenostavitev, zlasti z uporabo novih tehnologij.
Registration and identification are very burdensome for farmers, so it is therefore important to use all opportunities to simplify, especially with the use of the new technologies.
To je zlasti pomembno za identifikacijo prašičev v čredah pri integrirani ali zunanje integrirani proizvodnji, se pravi rejci pujskov in prašičev za zakol na isti kmetiji ali sodelujoči proizvajalci.
This is especially important for the identification of pigs in herds with integrated or externally integrated production. i.e. producers with piglets and pigs for slaughter at the same farm alternatively producers who cooperate.
Uporaba številke proizvajalca namesto številke gospodarstva je prav tako varna metoda, kar se tiče sledljivosti, in mnogo enostavnejša.
The use of producer number instead of holding number is just as safe a method as far as traceability is concerned and much simpler.
Zakonodajo o identifikaciji živali bi bilo treba prenoviti, da bo prožnejša in manj birokratska.
Legislation on animal identification should be revised to make it more flexible and less bureaucratic.
Sedanja zakonodaja na tem področju je preveč toga, da bi služila svojemu namenu, s čimer povzroča neupravičene stroške kmetijski proizvodnji, v primeru izbruha bolezni pa je lahko tudi kontraproduktivna.
Current legislation in this area is too rigid to serve its purpose and therefore causes not only unwarranted costs for the farming industry but may even be counterproductive in a disease outbreak situation.
Zakonodajo bi bilo treba prenoviti in pravila prilagoditi, da bodo prožnejša in manj birokratska, ne da bi posegali v namen zakonodaje. .
The legislation should be reviewed and rules made more flexible and less bureaucratic, without violating the purpose of the legislation. .
V sisteme identifikacije živali bi bilo treba čim prej vpeljati nove tehnologije, vendar le po temeljiti presoji vpliva z analizo razmerja med stroški in koristmi ter oceno zanesljivosti nove tehnologije.
Whilst new technology should be incorporated into animal identification schemes as soon as is possible, they should only be incorporated after a thorough impact assessment which includes a cost benefit analysis and assessment of how reliable the new technology is.
Prav tako bi bilo treba odpraviti zahtevo po ločenih registrih za živino.
Separate registers for cattle should also no longer be required.