natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2.1 da je bila zadevna oseba osebno povabljena ali prek pristojnega zastopnika pravočasno in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju obravnave , ki se je zaključila z odločbo, izdano v nenavzočnosti, in obveščena o dejstvu , da se lahko takšna odločba izreče v primeru , če se oseba ne udeleži sojenja
2.1 the person was summoned in person or informed in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State through a competent representative and in due time, of the scheduled date and place of the hearing which led to the decision rendered in absentia and informed about the fact that such a decision may be handed down in case the person does not appear for the trial
2.1 je bila oseba neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko pravočasno uradno obveščena, v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja , ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim datumom in krajem sojenja in je bila osebno obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče tudi , če se sojenja ne udeleži ;
2.1 the person was directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information in due time, in a language which he /she understood , in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State , about the scheduled date and place of the trial which led to the decision in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that the person concerned was aware of the scheduled date and place of the trial and was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear for the trial
Datum in kraj , kjer je bila oseba povabljena ali kako drugače obveščena:
Time and place when and where the person was summoned or otherwise informed :
Kdaj in kje ( datum in kraj ) je bila oseba povabljena ali kako drugače osebno uradno obveščena:
Time and place when and where the person was summoned or received in person the official information by other means :
Jezik obvestila:
Language in which the information was delivered :
Opišite, kako je bila oseba obveščena:
Describe how the person was informed:
Priloga – polje d – točka 2.1 a (novo)
Annex – box d – point 2.1 a (new)
2.1a je oseba po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
2.1a having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Navedite, kako je bil ta pogoj izpolnjen:
Provide information on how this condition has been met:
Priloga – polje d – točka 2.2
Annex – box d – point 2.2
2.2 da je oseba po vročitvi odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti, izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti
2.2 the person, after being served with the decision rendered in absentia , expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia
2.2 je oseba po tem , ko ji je bila osebno vročena odločba in je bila izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o pravici do pritožbe ali do ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo v razveljavitev prvotne odločbe, izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe ;
2.2 the person, after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision
Opišite, kdaj in kako je oseba izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti :
Describe when and how the person expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia :
Opišite, kdaj je bila osebi odločba vročena, na kakšen način je bila obveščena o svoji pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe in kako je izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe:
Describe when the person was served with the decision, how he/she was informed about his/her right to a retrial or an appeal and when and how the person expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision:
Priloga – polje d – točka 2.3.1 – alinea 1
Annex – box d – point 2.3.1 - indent 1
– oseba je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja in pravici , da je prisotna na tem sojenju ; in
– the person was expressly informed about the right to a retrial and to be present at that trial; and
– je bila oseba izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o pravici do pritožbe ali ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo v razveljavitev prvotne odločbe ; in
- the person was expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood , about the right to a retrial or an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , and
Priloga – polje d – točka 2.3.2
Annex – box d – point 2.3.2
 2.3.2 osebi ni bila vročena odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti, in
 2.3.2 the person was not served with the decision rendered in absentia , and
 2.3.2 osebi odločba ni bila vročena in
 2.3.2. the person was not served with the decision and
– osebi bo vročena odločba , izdana v nenavzočnosti, v …. dnevih po predaji ; in
– the person will be served with the decision rendered in absentia within … days after the surrender; and
– osebi bo ta odločba osebno vročena v …. dnevih po predaji in
– the person will be personally served with this decision within … days after the surrender; and
– ko bo osebi vročena odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti, bo oseba izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja in pravici do navzočnosti na tem sojenju ; in
– when served with the decision rendered in absentia , the person will be expressly informed about the right to a retrial and to be present at that trial; and
– ko bo osebi vročena odločba, bo izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga razume, o pravici do pritožbe ali ponovnega sojenja , na katerem ima pravico sodelovati in na katerem se bo lahko vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bo lahko vodilo v razveljavitev prvotne odločbe ; in in
– when served with this decision, the person will be expressly informed, in a language which he/she understands, about the right to a retrial or an appeal , in which he/she will have the right to participate, which will allow the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be (re)examined and which may lead to the original decision being quashed , ; and
– po tem, ko je bila osebi vročena odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti, bo imela oseba na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje.
– after being served with the decision rendered in absentia , the person will have … days to request a retrial.
– je oseba imela po tem, ko ji je bila odločba vročena , na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje ali vloži pritožbo, česar v tem času ni storila .
– after being served with this decision, the person had ...... days to request a retrial or appeal and he/she did not make any such request it during that period .
Če ste obklj ukali okence 2.3.2, prosimo potrdite:
If you ticked box 2 .3.2, please confirm
 ali je zadevna oseba, ko je bila v državi izvršitve obveščena o vsebini evropskega naloga za prijetje, pred predajo zahtevala kopijo sodbe in sta ji bila kopija ali izvleček sodbe prek izvršilnega sodnega organa posredovana v jezika, ki ga je razumela, v ... dneh po tem, ko je to zahtevala.
 that if the person concerned , when being informed in the executing State about the content of the European arrest warrant, requested to a copy of the judgment before being surrendered, and was provided with a copy of the judgment or with an extract of the judgment in a language which he/she understood ..... days after the request was made via the executing judicial authority.
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA
Člen 1 – točka (e)
Article 1 – point e
1) v členu 1 se doda naslednja točka:
1) the following point shall be added to Article 1:
(e) "Odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti" pomeni odločbo, kot je opredeljena v točki (a), če oseba ni bila osebno navzoča v sodnem postopku, iz katerega izhaja ta odločba.";
" (e) ' Decision rendered in absentia ' shall mean a decision as defined in (a) when the person did not personally appear in the proceedings resulting in that decision." ;
Člen 3 – točka 2 – točka b
Article 3 – point 2 - point b
Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka (i) – uvodni del
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i - introductory part
(i) če je bila odločba izdana v nenavzočnosti v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je:
(i) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the decision was rendered in absentia , unless the certificate states that the person:
(i) če je bila odločba v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4 izdana po sojenju , na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice :
(i) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the decision was rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person , unless the certificate states that the person , in accordance the national law of the issuing Member State :
Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka (i) – točka (i)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i – point i
(i) pravočasno in v jeziku, ki ga je razumela,
(i) in due time, and in a language which he/she understood ,
( i) bila osebno povabljena ali prek pristojnega zastopnika pravočasno in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju obravnave, ki se je zaključila z odločbo, izdano v nenavzočnosti
(i) was summoned in person or informed in accordance with the national law of the issuing State through a competent representative and in due time, of the scheduled date and place of the hearing which led to the decision rendered in absentia
( a) neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem,
(a ) either was directly summoned in person or by other means actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial,
obveščena o dejstvu , da se lahko takšna sodba izreče v primeru , če se oseba ne udeleži sojenja ,
informed about the fact that such a decision may be handed down in case the person does not appear for the trial;
(b) osebno obveščena, da se lahko odločba izda tudi , če se ne udeleži sojenja ;
(b ) was personally informed that the decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear for the trial;
Člen 3 – točka 2
Article 3 – point 2
Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka i – točka (i a) (novo)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i – point ia (new)
(ia) po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju; ali
(i a) having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial; or
Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka (i) – točka (i i)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i – point ii
(ii) pristojnim organom izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija zadeve; ali
(ii) expressly stated to a competent authority that he or she does not contest the case; or
Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka (i) – točka (iii)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i – point iii
( iii) potem , ko ji je bila vročena odločba , izdana v nenavzočnosti, in je bila obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja in pravici , da je prisotna na tem sojenju :
(iii) after being served with the decision rendered in absentia and being expressly informed about the right to a retrial and to be present at that trial :
( c) po tem , ko ji je bila osebno vročena odločba in je bila izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o pravici do pritožbe ali do ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo v razveljavitev prvotne odločbe :
(iii) after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood , about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed :
– oseba izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti ;
– expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia ;
– izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe;
– expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision;
– ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja v ustreznem roku, ki je vsaj … dni,
– did not request a retrial in the applicable timeframe which was of at least […] days ;
- ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja ali vložila pritožbe v ustreznem roku, ki je vsaj 10 dni in najdlje 15 dni.
– did not request a retrial or an appeal in the applicable timeframe, which shall be a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of 15 days ;
Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka (i a) (novo)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
(ia) v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4 oseba ni bila navzoča, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da se je oseba, potem ko je bila izrecno obveščena o sodnem postopku in možnosti, da osebno sodeluje na sojenju, izrecno odpovedala pravici do ustnega zaslišanja in izrecno dejala, da ne izpodbija odločbe.
(ia) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the person did not appear in person, unless the certificate states that the person, having been expressly informed about the proceedings and the possibility of participat ing in person in the trial, expressly waive d the right to an oral hearing and expressly indicated that he or she did not contest the case.
Člen 3 – točka 3
Article 3 – point 3
Priloga – polje h – točka 3 – točki 1 in 2
Annex – box h – point 3 - points 1 and 2
Navedite, ali je bila odločba izdana v nenavzočnosti :
Indicate if the decision was rendered in absentia :
Navedite, ali je bila oseba navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo :
Indicate if the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision :
1.  Da, oseba je bila navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo .
1.  Yes, the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision.
Če ste na to vprašanje odgovorili z " ne ", prosimo navedite, ali :
If you answered “no” to this question, please indicate if:
Priloga – polje h – točka 2.1
Annex – box h – point 2.1
2.1 je bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena , pravočasno in v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja , ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena z načrtovanim datumom in krajem sojenja in je bila osebno obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče tudi , če se sojenja ne udeleži ;
2.1 the person was directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received, in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State, official information in due time and in a language which he/she understood , , about the scheduled date and place of the trial which led to the decision in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that the person concerned was aware of the scheduled date and place of the trial and was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear at the trial
Datum in kraj , kjer je bila oseba povabljena ali kako drugače obveščena:
Time and place when and where the person was summoned or otherwise informed:
Kdaj in kje ( datum in kraj ) je bila oseba povabljena ali kako drugače osebno uradno obveščena:
Time and place when and where the person was summoned or by other means received the official information in person :
Priloga – polje h – točka 2.1 a (novo)
Annex – box h – point 2.1 a (new)
2.1a. (b) je oseba po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
2.1a. having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Navedite, kako je bil ta pogoj izpolnjen:
P rovide information on how this condition has been met :
Priloga – polje h – točka 2.2
Annex – box h – point 2.2
2.2 da je oseba pred ali po vročitvi odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti, izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe , izdane v nenavzočnosti .
2.2 the person, before or after being served with the decision rendered in absentia , expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia .
2.2 je bila oseba pred ali po tem , ko ji je bila osebno vročena odločba in je bila v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, izrecno obveščena o pravici do pritožbe ali ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe, izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe.
2.2 the person, before or after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision.
Opišite, kdaj je bila osebi odločba vročena, na kakšen način je bila obveščena o svoji pravici do ponovnega sojenja in pritožbe in kako je izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe:
Describe when the person was served with the decision, how he/she was informed about his/her right to a retrial or to an appeal and when and how the person expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision:
Priloga – polje h – točka 2.3
Annex – box h – point 2.3
 2.3 osebi je bila vročena odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti, dne ….. (dan/mesec/leto) in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja v državi članici izdajateljici pod naslednjimi pogoji:
 2.3 the person was served with the decision rendered in absentia on ………… (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial in the issuing State under the following conditions:
 2.3 je bila osebi ……… (dan/mesec/leto) osebno vročena odločba, izdana po sojenju, na katerem ni bila navzoča, in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe v državi članici izdajateljici pod naslednjimi pogoji:
 2.3 the person was personally served with the decision following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person on ………… (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial or to an appeal in the issuing State under the following conditions:
– je bila oseba izrecno obveščena v jeziku, ki ga je razumela, o pravici do pritožbe ali ponovnega sojenja, na katerem bi imela pravico sodelovati in na katerem bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo v razveljavitev prvotne odločbe ; in
- the person was expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood , about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , and
– oseba je imela po tem, ko je bila obveščena o tej pravici, na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje , vendar v tem času ponovnega sojenja ni zahtevala.
– after being informed of this right, the person had …. days to request a retrial and he or she did not request it during this period.
– je imela oseba po tem, ko je bila obveščena o tej pravici, na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje ali vloži pritožbo, česar v tem času ni storila.
- after being informed of this right, the person had ...... days to request a retrial or an appeal and he or she did not request it during that period.
Predlog spremembe
Amendment 3
Priloga – polje h – točka 2.3 a (novo)
Annex – box h – point 2.3 a (new)
2.3a se je oseba po tem, ko je bila izrecno obveščena o sodnem postopku in možnosti, da osebno sodeluje na sojenju, izrecno odpovedala pravici do ustnega zaslišanja in izrecno dejala, da ne izpodbija odločbe.
2.3a the person, having been expressly informed about the proceedings and the possibility of participat ing in person in the trial, expressly waive d the right to an oral hearing and expressly indicated that he or she did not contest the case.
Opišite, kdaj in kako se je oseba odpovedala pravici do ustnega zaslišanja in dejala, da ne izpodbija odločbe.
Describe when and how the person waived the right to an oral hearing and indicated that he or she did not contest the case:
Člen 4 – točka 1
Article 4 – point 1
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA
Člen 2 – točka (i)
Article 2 – point i
1) v členu 2 se doda naslednja točka:
1) the following point shall be added to Article 2:
(i) "Odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti," pomeni odredbo o zaplembi, kot je opredeljena pod (c), če oseba ni bila osebno navzoča v postopku, iz katerega izhaja ta odločba.";
" (i) ' Decision rendered in absentia ' shall mean a confiscation order as defined in (c) when the person did not personally appear in the proceedings resulting in that decision." ;
Člen 4 – točka 2
Article 4 – point 2
Člen 8 – odstavek 2 – točka (e) – uvodni del
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e – introductory part