natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročilu se po potrebi priložijo predlogi za prilagoditev ter se podrobno navezuje na dejavnosti mreže za napredek pri zasnovi, razvoju in izvajanju evropskega e-pravosodja, zlasti s stališča lažjega dostopa državljanov do pravnega varstva .
This report shall be accompanied, if need be, by proposals for adaptation and shall specifically relate the Network ’ s activities to progress with the design, development and implementation of European e-justice, particularly from the point of view of facilitating citizens ’ access to justice .
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu pridružitvenemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Kraljevino Maroko na drugi zaradi pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu pridružitvenemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Kraljevino Maroko na drugi zaradi pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro- Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2007)0404 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0404 ),
– ob upoštevanju besedila Sveta (13104/2007), ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za privolitev v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3), v povezavi z drugim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in členom 310 Pogodbe ES ( C6-0383/2008 ),
– having regard to the text of the Council (13104/2007),– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, second sentence, and Article 310 of the EC Treaty ( C6‑0383/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0458/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0458/2008 ),
Protokol k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu med ES in Marokom, da se upošteva pristop Bolgarije in Romunije k EU
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EC and Morocco to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
o dostopu javnost do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (izvajanje uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001)
on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001)
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ES in še posebej člena 254 o obveznosti objavljanja aktov ter člena 255(2) o pravici državljanov in prebivalcev EU do dostopa do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije,
– having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular to Article 254 on the obligation to publish acts and Article 255(2) on EU citizens' and residents’ right to access European Parliament, Council and Commission documents,
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES in še posebej člena 207(3) o obveznosti Sveta, da v svojem poslovniku opredeli pogoje, pod katerimi ima javnost dostop do dokumentov Sveta,
– having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular to Article 207(3) on the Council's obligation to specify in its rules of procedure the conditions under which the public shall have access to Council documents,
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o EU in zlasti člena 1 (načelo odprtosti kot eno splošnih načel Unije), člena 6 (demokracija), člena 28(1) in člena 41(1) (uresničevanje pravice dostopa do dokumentov, povezanih s skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko ter policijskim in pravosodnim sodelovanjem v kazenskih zadevah),
– having regard to the EU Treaty, and notably to Article 1 (principle of openness as one of the general principles of the Union), Article 6 (democracy), Article 28(1) and Article 41(1) (application of the right of access to documents relating to the common foreign and security policy and to police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters),
– ob upoštevanju členov 10 in 16 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, kot naj bi se spremenila z lizbonsko pogodbo, ter členov 15 in 298 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 10 and 16 of the Treaty on European Union as it is due to be amended by the Treaty of Lisbon and to Articles 15 and 298 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti njenih členov 41 (pravica do dobrega upravljanja) in 42 (pravica dostopa do dokumentov),
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and notably to its Articles 41 (right to good administration) and 42 (right of access to documents),
– ob upoštevanju uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1700/2003 z dne 22. septembra 2003 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS, Euratom) št. 354/83 o odpiranju za javnost arhivskega gradiva Evropske gospodarske skupnosti in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1700/2003 of 22 September 2003 amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 concerning the opening to the public of the historical archives of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community
UL L 243, 27.9.2003, str.
OJ L 243, 27.9.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Sodišča prve stopnje o dostopu do dokumentov, še zlasti nedavnih sodb Sodišča prve stopnje v zadevah Bavarian Lager Co.
– having regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) and of the Court of First Instance on access to documents, and notably to the recent judgments of the Court of First Instance in Bavarian Lager Co.
Ltd proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti (zadeva T-194/04) ter Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi Kraljevina Švedska in Maurizio Turco proti Svetu Evropske unije (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P, sodba Sodišča evropski skupnosti v zadevi Turco),
Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Case T-194/04) and of the ECJ in Kingdom of Sweden and Maurizio Turco vs Council of the European Union (joined cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P, the "ECJ Judgment in the Turco case"),
– ob upoštevanju dejavnosti in dokumentov, ki sta jih glede vprašanja dostopa do dokumentov pripravila evropski varuh človekovih pravic, pa tudi evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov,
– having regard to the activities and documents produced by the European Ombudsman on the issue of access to documents, as well as by the European Data Protection Supervisor,
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije z dne 30. aprila 2008 o uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije ( KOM(2008)0229 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal of 30 April 2008 for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents ( COM(2008)0229 ),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka konvencije Sveta Evrope o dostopu do uradnih dokumentov,
– having regard to the Draft Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents,
– ob upoštevanju ustnih vprašanj Evropskega parlamenta za Svet in Komisijo o izvajanju sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi Turco,
– having regard to its Oral Questions to the Council and the Commission on the implementation of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case,
– ob upoštevanju letnih poročil Sveta, Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta o dostopu do dokumentov za leto 2006, pa tudi člena 17 uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001,
– having regard to the Annual Reports for 2006 from the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament on access to documents, as well as to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001,
– ob upoštevanju členov 45 in 97(7) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 45 and Rule 97(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0459/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0459/2008 ),
A. ker demokracije, ki temeljijo na načelih pravne države, zavezuje načelo javnega značaja pravil, ki zadevajo državljane, zaradi česar morajo institucije EU zagotoviti odprtost in preglednost, kar še zlasti velja za procese odločanja, tako da so seje, razprave in glasovanja demokratičnih zakonodajnih organov javni, na voljo pa so tudi osnutki zakonov in z njimi povezana besedila,
A. whereas democracies based on the rule of law are bound by the principle of publicity of the rules that affect citizens, which implies a duty of openness and transparency for the EU institutions and notably of their decision-making processes, so that democratic legislative bodies hold their meetings, discussions and votes in public, while draft laws and related texts are also available,
B. ker imajo državljani – da se zagotovi odgovornost in legitimnost demokratičnega političnega sistema – pravico vedeti:
B. whereas, in order to ensure the accountability and legitimacy of a democratic political system, citizens have a right to know:
- kako delujejo njihovi zastopniki po tem, ko so izvoljeni ali imenovani v javne organe ali ko zastopajo države članice na evropski ali mednarodni ravni (načelo odgovornosti),
- how their representatives act, once elected or appointed to public bodies or representing the Member State at the European or international level (principle of accountability),
- kako deluje proces odločanja (vključno z dokumenti, predlogi sprememb, urnikom, udeleženimi akterji, oddanimi glasovi itd.),
- how the decision-making process works (including documents, amendments, timetable, players involved, votes cast, etc),
- koliko javnega denarja je dodeljenega in porabljenega ter s kakšnimi rezultati (načelo sledljivosti sredstev),
- how public money is allocated, spent and with which results (principle of traceability of funds),
C. ker sta mednarodna skupnost in Evropska unija, na podlagi izkušenj njenih držav članic, postopoma začeli priznavati resnično „pravico dostopa do dokumentov“ in „pravico do obveščenosti“, ki temeljita na načelih demokracije, javnosti, preglednosti in odprtosti,
C. whereas the international community and the European Union, on the basis of the experience of its Member States, have progressively come to recognize a true “right of access to documents” and a “right to information” based on the principles of democracy, publicity, transparency and openness,
D. ker je iz količinskih podatkov v letnih poročilih o izvajanju uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 s strani institucij EU mogoče sklepati, da je bil dostop do dokumentov dovoljen v večjem številu zadev (splošno zmanjšanje števila in deleža zavrnitev), pri čemer se med institucijami EU razlikujejo razlogi za zavrnitve (najbolj pogost je varstvo postopka odločanja), in pa, kar zadeva dokumente občutljive narave, da Komisija in Parlament v svoje registre nista uvrstila nobenega tovrstnega dokumenta, medtem ko je Svet v svoj register uvrstil 79 dokumentov od skupaj 409 dokumentov občutljive narave; ker se zdi na podlagi kvalitativne analize očitno, da je bilo nekaj določb iz te uredbe glede pravilnega načina njene uporabe različno interpretiranih, zaradi česar so se državljani obrnili na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti,
D. whereas quantitative data contained in the Annual Reports in relation to the application of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 by the EU institutions suggest that access to documents has been granted in a higher number of cases (general decrease in the number and rate of refusals), while reasons for refusal vary among EU institutions (the first one being the protection of the decision-making process) and that as regards sensitive documents, the Commission and Parliament did not enter any such document in their registers, while the Council entered 79 sensitive documents out of 409 in its register; whereas from a qualitative analysis it appears clearly that a number of provisions of that Regulation gave rise to divergent interpretations as to the correct way to apply it, which led citizens to address the European Ombudsman and the ECJ,
E. ker Svet vključi medinstitucionalno referenčno številko le v omejeno število dokumentov, v nasprotju s členom 11(2) uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, s čimer otežuje povezovanje dokumentov s postopki ter dokumentom tudi zniža raven pomembnosti na „gradiva za seje“, ki se ne registrirajo, ali jih obravnava kot „diplomatske dokumente“, s čimer izniči pravico državljanov do dostopa do njih,
E. whereas the Council inserts the interinstitutional reference number only in a limited number of documents, contrary to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, thereby making it difficult to associate a document with a procedure, while it also either downgrades documents to "room documents" that are not registered, or treats them as "diplomatic" documents, hereby nullifying citizens' right of access to documents,
F. ker je treba skladno z uvodno izjavo 6 uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 zagotoviti tudi dostop do dokumentov, izdelanih v skladu s postopkom prenesenih pristojnosti (komitologija) in ker se devet desetin pripravljene zakonodaje sprejme v skladu s tem postopkom, zaradi česar je treba v tem okviru v celoti zagotoviti ustrezen in pregleden demokratični nadzor,
F. whereas according to Recital 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, access should also be granted to documents produced under the delegated powers procedure (comitology) and whereas nine-tenths of the legislation produced is adopted under that procedure and, accordingly, proper and transparent Parliamentary and democratic scrutiny should be fully guaranteed within that framework,
G. ker je svetovni splet postal poglavitni način za vpogled državljanov v dokumente EU, pri čemer se je povečalo število dokumentov, ki jih institucije EU dajo na voljo prek spleta, zaradi česar je treba sedaj dodatno izboljšati prijaznost spletnih strani institucij EU in dokumentnih spletnih strani do uporabnika in njihovo medsebojno povezanost ter oblikovati enotni portal EU za dostopanje do vseh dokumentov, postopkov in institucij,
G. whereas the Internet has become the main way for citizens to consult EU documents, while the number of documents made available by EU institutions on-line has increased, which creates a need now to further improve the user-friendliness of EU institutions and documents websites, their interconnection and the creation of a single EU portal to access all EU documents, procedures and institutions,
1. poudarja, da je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v vzorčni sodbi v zadevi Turco prišlo do sklepa, da je „v uredbi št. 1049/2001 načeloma določena obveznost razkritja mnenj pravne službe Sveta v zvezi z zakonodajnim postopkom“
Stresses that the landmark ECJ Judgment in the Turco case concluded that "Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 imposes, in principle, an obligation to disclose the opinion of the Council's legal service relating to a legislative process"
- pravica dostopa javnosti do dokumentov institucij EU izhaja iz demokratičnega značaja teh institucij, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 4 in členu 1 uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001,
- the public right of access to the documents of the EU institutions derives from the democratic character of those institutions, as provided for in Recital 4 and Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001,
- izjeme, ki jih vsebuje uredba (kot je varstvo postopka odločanja), je treba razlagati strogo in jih presojati z vidika prevladujočega javnega interesa za razkritje, ki je povezan z demokracijo, tesnejšim sodelovanjem državljanov v procesu odločanja, legitimnostjo uprave ter učinkovitostjo in odgovornostjo do državljanov
- the exceptions contained in that Regulation (such as the protection of the decision-making process) must be strictly interpreted and balanced against the overriding public interest in disclosure, as it is linked to democracy, participation of citizens more closely in the decision-making process, legitimacy of the administration, effectiveness and accountability to citizens
Dokument, za katerega bi lahko veljala izjema (na primer „pravno mnenje“), je treba vsebinsko preučiti, da se določi, kateri njegovi deli so zajeti v izjemi; tveganje, povezano z razkritjem, „mora biti razumno predvidljivo in ne le hipotetično“; uravnotežiti je treba takšno tveganje in „javni interes, da se omogoči dostop do dokumenta ob upoštevanju prednosti, ki izhajajo ... iz povečane preglednosti, to je tesnejšega sodelovanja državljanov v postopku odločanja in večje zakonitosti v upravi ter njeno učinkovitejše in odgovornejše ravnanje v razmerju do državljanov v demokratičnem sistemu“. ,
A document that could be covered by an exception (such as a "legal opinion") should be examined as to its content to evaluate which parts of it are covered by the exception; the risks linked to disclosure must be "reasonably foreseeable and not purely hypothetical"; a balancing between such a risk and "the public interest in the document being made accessible in the light of the advantages stemming [...] from increased openness, in that enabled citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and accountable to the citizen in a democratic system". ,
- ti zaključki so še pomembnejši, ko institucije EU delujejo v svoji zakonodajni funkciji
- these conclusions are even more important when EU institutions act in their legislative capacity
- preglednost glede različnih stališč, povezanih z danim zakonodajnim aktom (in njegovo zakonitostjo), „omogoča javno razpravo o razhajanjih med različnimi mnenji ter daje institucijam večjo legitimnost v očeh evropskih državljanov in povečuje njihovo zaupanje“
- openness with regard to different views concerning an act (and its legality) "contributes to conferring greater legitimacy on the institutions in the eyes of the European citizens and improving their confidence in them by allowing divergences between various points of view to be openly debated"
Odstavek 59 sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi Turco. ,
Paragraph 59 of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case. ,
- institucija mora predložiti podrobno navedbo razlogov za zavrnitev
- detailed statement of reasons for a refusal must be given by the institution
Odstavek 69 sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi Turco. ,
Paragraph 69 of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case. ;
- izjema lahko velja le za obdobje, ko je varstvo dokumenta utemeljeno na podlagi vsebine dokumenta
- the exception can only apply for the period during which protection is justified on the basis of the content of the document
2. poudarja, da omenjena sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v EU dodatno krepi načelo, po katerem morajo biti dejavnosti, dokumenti in odločitve demokratičnih institucij javne, kar je pogoj za njihovo zakonitost, legitimnost in odgovornost na podlagi člena 6 Pogodbe o EU ter členov 254 in 255 Pogodbe o ES, zaradi česar morajo biti dokumenti objavljeni in v vsakem primeru dostopni, vsako odstopanje od tega načela pa je treba strogo omejiti in strogo razložiti;
Emphasises that the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case further strengthens in the EU the principle by which democratic institutions have a duty to ensure publicity of their activities, documents and decisions, which is a condition of their legality, legitimacy and accountability, on the basis of Article 6 of the EU Treaty and of Articles 254 and 255 of the EC Treaty, and that consequently documents must be published and in any event accessible and that any exception to this principle should be limited and interpreted strictly;
4. poziva institucije EU, naj določijo skupna pravila o tem, kako izvajati upravne postopke in kako vlagati upravne dokumente, jih razvrščati kot zaupne, odpravljati njihovo zaupnost, jih registrirati in širiti v institucijah in zunaj njih, ob upoštevanju, da je načelo preglednosti neločljivo od načela dobrega upravljanja, kot so v členu 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije razglasili Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija v istem kontekstu bi bilo treba v okviru revizije uredbe št. 1049/2001 dopolniti uredbo Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 354/83 z dne 1. februarja 1983 o odpiranju za javnost arhivskega gradiva Evropske gospodarske skupnosti in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo
Calls on the EU institutions to define common rules on the way in which administrative procedures should be carried out and administrative documents should be tabled, classified, declassified, registered and disseminated inside and outside the EU institutions, bearing in mind that the transparency principle is indissociable from the principle of good administration as proclaimed by the European Parliament, Council and Commission in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; in the same perspective, Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 concerning the opening to the public of the historical archives of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community
1 , da bi vključevala opredelitve skupnih pravil glede sprotnih, vmesnih in zgodovinskih arhivov, s čemer bi se izognili sedanjim neskladjem v ravnanju institucij EU in držav članic;
1. should be merged as part of the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 to include definitions of common rules on live, intermediate and historical archives in order to avoid the current inconsistencies between the practices of the EU institutions and the Member States;
– dejavnostih, sodelovanju in prisotnosti poslancev Evropskega parlamenta pri parlamentarnem delu, in sicer v absolutnih, relativnih in odstotnih vrednostih, ki so na voljo in dostopne državljanom tudi prek iskalnih meril
– MEPs' activities, participation in and attendance at Parliamentary work, in absolute, relative and percentage terms, available and accessible to citizens also through search criteria