natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sedmi okvirni program je priložnost za EU, da svojo raziskovalno politiko uskladi z gospodarskimi in družbenimi ambicijami, zlasti z utrditvijo evropskega raziskovalnega prostora.
FP7 is a chance for the EU to make its research policy match its economic and social ambitions, in particular by consolidating the European Research Area (ERA).
S proračunom 54 milijard EUR za obdobje 2007–2013 je z leti postal eden najpomembnejših programov za podpiranje raziskav na svetu in je glavni instrument raziskovalne politike EU.
Allocated a budget of around EUR 54 billion for the period 2007-2013, FP7 has, over the years, become one of the largest research support programmes in the world and represents the primary tool of EU research policy.
Opredeljeni so bili štirje glavni cilji, ki ustrezajo štirim posebnim programom, s katerimi bo treba strukturirati evropska prizadevanja na področju raziskav: Sodelovanje, Zamisli, Ljudje in Zmogljivosti.
Four main objectives have been identified and correspond to four specific programmes that must structure the European research effort: the Cooperation programme, the Ideas programme, the People programme and the Capacity programme.
Osnovni cilj je omogočiti EU spopadanje z velikimi družbenimi izzivi, ki zadevajo vse države članice in na katere ne morejo odgovoriti same (staranje prebivalstva in zdravje, oskrba z energijo, vodo in hrano, trajnostni razvoj, boj proti podnebnim spremembam itd.), ter razvoj znanja, ki bo našim podjetjem omogočilo večjo inovativnost in povečalo njihovo konkurenčnost.
The aim is to enable the EU to respond to the great societal challenges that concern all Member States and to which they cannot respond alone (ageing population and health, energy, water and food supplies, sustainable development, climate change, and so on), as well as to develop the knowledge to enable our businesses to innovate more and enhance their competitiveness.
Da bi zagotovili, da bo sedmi okvirni program še vedno izpolnjeval potrebe evropskih politik, je bilo v členu 7(2) Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 predvideno, da se pred koncem leta 2010 pripravi vmesna ocena na podlagi posebnih podatkov.
In order to ensure that FP7 still meets the needs of European policies, Article 7(2) of Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 had provided for an interim evaluation, based on specific data, by the end of 2010.
Poročevalec pozdravlja dobro opravljeno delo strokovne skupine za vmesno oceno sedmega okvirnega programa in sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja, čeprav je imela zelo široko pooblastilo, ki bi zaslužilo dosti bolj tehničen pristop, in torej upa, da bo ta uporabljen za prihodnje okvirne programe.
The rapporteur welcomes the good work carried out by the expert groups on the interim evaluation of FP7 and the Risk-Sharing Finance Facility, despite a very broad remit that would have merited a much more technical approach, and therefore hopes that such will be the case for future framework programmes.
Vendar poročevalec izraža razočaranje zaradi zamude pri objavi poročila Komisije o tej temi; objava je bila pričakovana za konec leta 2010, nazadnje pa je bilo poročilo objavljeno šele februarja 2011.
However, the rapporteur regrets the delay in publication of the Commission communication on this subject; the communication was expected by the end of 2010 but did not, in fact, see the light of day until February 2011.
Poročevalec je razočaran predvsem zato, ker pri vmesni oceni niso bili dovolj upoštevani splošni vidiki raziskav v EU in državah članicah.
The rapporteur regrets, above all, that this evaluation did not take sufficient account of the global aspects of research between the EU and the Member States.
Ob tej oceni je treba upoštevati velika finančna sredstva, za katere je še treba pripraviti načrt: 28,8 milijarde EUR za tri leta (2011–2013) v primerjavi s 25,8 milijardami, uporabljenimi za prva štiri leta sedmega okvirnega programa (2007–2010) in 17 milijardami za šesti okvirni program (2002–2006).
This evaluation is to be seen in the light of the significant sums still to be programmed: EUR 28.8 billion over three years (2011-2013), compared with the 25.8 billion programmed for the first four years of FP7 (2007-2010) and the 17 billion under FP6 (2002 to 2006).
Tako bi bilo treba leta 2011 za raziskave nameniti več kot 8,5 milijarde EUR, leta 2012 več kot 9,5 milijarde EUR in leta 2013 več kot 10,5 milijarde EUR.
For 2011 there are more than EUR 8.5 billion, for 2012 more than EUR 9.5 billion, and for 2013 more than EUR 10.5 billion to be devoted to research.
Za tako velike zneske je treba pripraviti posebno analizo, da bi spodbudili udeležbo zadevnih akterjev in preprečili razpršitev sredstev med programe, ki ne delujejo ustrezno ali ne izpolnjujejo potreb.
Such sums merit specific analysis in order to encourage participation of the actors concerned and avoid financing being dispersed among programmes that do not function properly or do not meet needs.
Poročevalec meni, da je potrebno dobro upravljanje javnih sredstev, ne glede na to, ali je kriza ali ne, vendar bo treba vse spremembe ali preusmeritve sprejeti ob upoštevanju stabilnosti, splošne celovitosti in pravne varnosti, na katerih temelji medsebojno zaupanje zainteresiranih strani.
The rapporteur considers that sound management of public money is necessary, whether in a crisis period or not, but that any modification or reorientation must respect stability, overall cohesion and legal certainty, which are the basis for mutual confidence between stakeholders.
Nekaj splošnih smernic za ta vmesni pregled:
A few broad guidelines for this mid-term review:
– poenostavitev: čeprav je bila obravnavana že v resoluciji z dne 11. novembra 2010 o poenostavitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov, je treba znova razmisliti o tem, da zaradi izpolnjevanja zahtev Evropskega parlamenta.
- simplification: already dealt with in the resolution of 11 November 2010 on simplifying the implementation of the Research Framework Programmes, this needs to be addressed again in order to follow up the requests made by Parliament.
Ena od ugotovljenih težav so namreč zapleteni in obremenjujoči upravni postopki, zaradi česar raziskovalci namesto za evropska sredstva raje zaprosijo za nacionalna, Evropa pa je na področju raziskav nepriljubljena.
In fact, one of the difficulties noted is the complexity and burden of administrative procedures, as a result of which those seeking European financing are diverted towards national financing and Europe is made unpopular with regard to research.
Ta težava se je še poslabšala zaradi nedavne politike Komisije glede finančnih revizij.
This problem has been made worse by recent Commission policy on financial audits.
Zdaj se zdi več kot potrebno rešiti težave iz preteklosti, zlasti tiste, povezane s šestim okvirnim programom, in preprečiti, da bi se ponovile v sedmem ali katerem od prihodnjih okvirnih programov.
Today it seems more than necessary to solve the problems of the past, in particular those of FP6, and avoid repeating them in FP7, or in future framework programmes.
Reševanje pravnih sporov brez vključevanja Sodišča ter sedanje in prihodnje poenostavljanje ob upoštevanju dobrega upravljanja javnih sredstev so bistveni pogoj, da bo mogoče znanost, raziskave in inovacije obravnavati na evropski ravni, zlasti v pričakovanju pogajanj z državami članicami o osmem okvirnem programu, če želimo bolj evropeizirati raziskave in nazadnje ustvariti evropski raziskovalni prostor;
Settling legal proceedings, without involving the Court of Justice, and present and future simplification that respects sound management of public money, are an essential pre-requisite for science, research and innovation to be dealt with on a European scale, particularly with a view to the negotiations with the Member States on FP8, if we want to Europeanise research further and finally achieve a European Research Area.
– udeležba malih in srednjih podjetij: to pogosto velja za eno od pomanjkljivosti okvirnih programov in zahteva še veliko truda, vendar je opazno izboljšanje, cilj 15-odstotne udeležbe malih in srednjih podjetij je na primer v programu „Sodelovanje“ že skoraj dosežen;
- SME participation: often seen as one of the weaknesses of the framework programmes, efforts are still needed but an improvement is noted – for example, the 15% target for SME participation in the ‘Cooperation’ programme has almost been achieved;
– inovacije: v tem trenutku se krepi razsežnosti inovacij, torej je pomembno, da se v zadnjih letih okvirnega programa usmerimo v tovrstne projekte.
- innovation: a strengthening of the ‘innovation’ dimension can currently be seen and it is therefore important to direct the final years towards this type of project.
Poročevalec želi vseeno poudariti zavračanje, ki vlada po Evropi, glede povezovanja raziskav in inovacij povežejo s komercializacijo, čeprav bi bilo treba vedno upoštevati tudi to možnost;
The rapporteur is keen to stress, however, the refusal there is in Europe to link research/innovation and commercialisation, though potential for commercialisation should always be taken into account;
– sklad za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja: oblikovanje tega sklada je imelo zelo pozitiven vpliv, zato bi ga bilo treba nadaljevati in okrepiti za konec sedmega okvirnega programa in prihodnje programe;
- the Risk-Sharing Finance Facility: introduction of this facility has had a very positive effect and it should be continued and intensified for the end of FP7 and in future programmes;
– poročevalec predlaga ozemeljsko usmerjene raziskovalne in razvojne politike, da se raziskave usklajeno razdelijo med vse univerze.
- the rapporteur proposes that research and development policies be territorialised so that research is distributed harmoniously in relation to all universities.
Povezavo z odličnostjo, ki jo je pogosto najti v mestnem okolju, bi bilo mogoče ustvariti z okrepitvijo virtualnih povezav, na primer s stalnimi videokonferencami in pametnimi povezavami med lokalnimi raziskovalnimi središči in centri odličnosti;
The link with excellence often found in urban areas could be made by intensifying virtual links, for example through permanent videoconferencing and a smart connection between territorialised research centres and centres of excellence;
Poročevalec na splošno in v zvezi z razpisi za zbiranje predlogov, ki jih je še treba objaviti, predlaga, naj bo njihov namen utrditi evropski raziskovalni prostor in dokazati, da je mogoče doseči evropsko dodano vrednost; vse to v pričakovanju pogajanj z državami članicami o prihodnjih finančnih perspektivah od leta 2014 za evropeizacijo raziskav.
More generally, and with regard to the project calls still to be launched, the rapporteur proposes that these be used to consolidate the ERA and prove that European added-value can exist; all this with a view to negotiating, with the Member States and for the future Financial Perspective from 2014, the Europeanisation of research.
Poročevalec: Carl Haglund
Rapporteur: Carl Haglund
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, naj v svojo resolucijo vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, to include the following in its motion for a resolution:
3. poudarja, da morata oblika in izvajanje sedanjega sedmega in prihodnjih okvirnih programov temeljiti na načelih enostavnosti, stabilnosti, pravne varnosti, doslednosti, odličnosti in zaupanja;
Stresses that the design and implementation of the current FP7 and future Framework Programmes must be based on the principles of simplicity, stability, legal certainty, consistency, excellence and trust;
9. pozdravlja poenostavitve glede sprejemljivosti stroškov za osebje ter poziva Komisijo, naj preuči dodatne ukrepe za poenostavitev, tudi glede prispevkov vlagateljev v naravi; se ponovno zavezuje dodatnemu poenostavljanju pravil o izvajanju proračuna EU, zlasti o izdatkih na področju raziskav; poziva Komisijo, naj dodatno poenostavi postopek vlog, vključno z zagotovitvijo pomoči raziskovalcem pri iskanju projektnih partnerjev; poziva Komisijo, naj na vrh svoje agende umesti izmenjave in sodelovanje med različnimi programi ter programi držav članic in preglednost;
Welcomes the simplifications concerning the acceptability of personnel costs and asks the Commission to explore further simplification measures, also with reference to contributions in kind by applicants; reaffirms its commitment to further simplifying the rules applicable to the implementation of the EU budget and to research spending in particular; calls on the Commission to further simplify the application process, including by providing researchers with assistance in finding project partners; asks the Commission to put the issues of exchanges and cooperation between the various programmes and Member State programmes and transparency at the top of its agenda;
Marta Andreasen, Francesca Balzani, Reimer Böge, Lajos Bokros, Giovanni Collino, Jean-Luc Dehaene, Göran Färm, José Manuel Fernandes, Carl Haglund, Lucas Hartong, Monika Hohlmeier, Sergej Kozlík, Jan Kozłowski, Alain Lamassoure, Giovanni La Via, Vladimír Maňka, Claudio Morganti, Nadežda Nejnski (Nadezhda Neynsky), Miguel Portas, László Surján, Angelika Werthmann, Jacek Włosowicz
Marta Andreasen, Francesca Balzani, Reimer Böge, Lajos Bokros, Giovanni Collino, Jean-Luc Dehaene, Göran Färm, José Manuel Fernandes, Carl Haglund, Lucas Hartong, Monika Hohlmeier, Sergej Kozlík, Jan Kozłowski, Alain Lamassoure, Giovanni La Via, Vladimír Maňka, Claudio Morganti, Nadezhda Neynsky, Miguel Portas, László Surján, Angelika Werthmann, Jacek Włosowicz
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................16
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................15
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0537 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0537 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2), člena 42 in člena 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7–0295/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 42 and Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0295/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju obrazloženih mnenj o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki so jih v okviru Protokola št. 2 predložili litovski parlament, luksemburška poslanska zbornica ter poljska dieta in senat in v katerih trdijo, da se osnutek zakonodajnega akta ne sklada z načelom subsidiarnosti,
– having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of the Protocol (No 2) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Lithuanian Parliament,the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies and by the Polish Diet and Senat, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
– ob upoštevanju člena 55 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7–0161/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0161/2011 ),
(3) Komisija bi morala imeti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe , z namenom, da dopolni ali spremeni nekatere nebistvene elemente Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
(3) The Commission should have the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty in order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 .
Treba bi bilo določiti elemente, za katere se to pooblastilo lahko uporabi, ter pogoje, ki naj za to pooblastilo veljajo.
The elements for which that power may be exercised should be defined, as well as the conditions to which that delegation is to be subject.
(3) Da bi zagotovili pravilno delovanje režima, ki ga uvaja ta Uredba , bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v zvezi z dopolnitvami ali spremembami nekaterih nebistvenih elementov Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
(3) In order to ensure the proper functioning of the regime established by this Regulation , the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of supplementing or amending certain non-essential elements of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 .
Komisija bi morala pri pripravi in oblikovanju delegiranih aktov zagotoviti hkratno, pravočasno in ustrezno posredovanje ustreznih dokumentov Evropskemu parlamentu.
The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament.
Ta predlog spremembe odraža „skupno razumevanje“ praktičnih ureditev za uporabo delegiranih aktov (člen 290 PDEU), ki ga Svet in Parlament še nista uradno potrdila.
This amendment reflects the "Common Understanding" on practical arrangements for the use of delegated acts (Article 290 TFUE) to be formally agreed on by the Council and the Parliament.
(4) Da se zagotovi enotna uporaba Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 v vseh državah članicah, bi bilo treba Komisijo pooblastiti za sprejemanje izvedbenih aktov v skladu s členom 291 Pogodbe .
(4) In order to guarantee a uniform application of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 in all Member States, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 291 of the Treaty.
(4) Da se zajamčijo enotni pogoji za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005, je treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila .
(4) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 , implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Ta pooblastila, razen kadar je izrecno določeno drugače, je treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije* .
T hose powers , save where explicitly provided otherwise, should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182 /2011 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers * .
* UL L 55, 28.2.2011, str.13.
* OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p.13..
Ta predlog spremembe upošteva uredbo o izvedbenih pooblastilih (Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije), ki je začela veljati 1. marca 2011.
This Amendment takes into account the "Regulation on implementing powers" (Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers) entering into force on 1 March 2011.
„Svetovalne storitve kmetom obsegajo najmanj eno ali več od zakonsko predpisanih zahtev po upravljanju ter načel dobrega kmetijskega in okoljskega delovanja iz členov 5 in 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 ter prilog II in III k navedeni uredbi, po potrebi pa tudi enega ali več standardov varstva pri delu, temelječih na zakonodaji Unije.“
As a minimum, the advisory service to farmers shall cover one or more of the statutory management requirements and good agricultural and environmental conditions provided for in Articles 5 and 6 of and Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and, where relevant, one or more of the occupational safety standards based on Union legislation.
Svetovalne storitve (tudi določba o tehničnem svetovanju) kmetom obvezno obsegajo več zakonsko predpisanih zahtev po upravljanju ter načel dobrega kmetijskega in okoljskega delovanja iz členov 5 in 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 ter prilog II in III k navedeni uredbi, po potrebi pa tudi enega ali več standardov varstva pri delu, temelječih na zakonodaji Unije.
The advisory service to farmers (including the provision of technical advice) shall in all cases cover more than one of the statutory management requirements and good agricultural and environmental conditions provided for in Articles 5 and 6 of and Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and, where relevant, one or more of the occupational safety standards based on Union legislation.
Člen 43 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1a
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1a
„ Za namene točke (c) prvega pododstavka izraz ,kmetje‘ pomeni osebe , ki bistven del svojega delovnega časa posvečajo kmetijskim dejavnostim in iz njih črpajo pomemben del svojega dohodka, po merilih, ki jih določi država članica.“
For the purposes of point (c) of the first subparagraph, ‘farmers’ means persons who devote an essential part of their working time to agricultural activities and derive from them a significant part of their income according to criteria to be defined by the Member State.
Pomoč iz tega člena lahko koristijo le kmetje ali njihova združenja , ki bistven del svojega delovnega časa posvečajo kmetijskim dejavnostim in iz njih črpajo pomemben del svojega dohodka, po merilih, ki jih določi država članica.
The aid to which this article refers shall only apply to farmers or farmers’ associations that devote an essential part of their working time to agricultural activities and derive from them a significant part of their income according to criteria to be defined by the Member State.
Člen 1 – točka 26 – točka b
Article 1 - point 26 – point b
Člen 66 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 3
Article 66 - paragraph 3 - subparagraph 3
„Komisija s pomočjo izvedbenih pravil sprejme pravila glede vzpostavitve in delovanja nacionalne mreže za podeželje.“
"The Commission shall, by means of implementing rules , adopt rules concerning the establishment and the operation of the national rural network."
„Komisija s pomočjo izvedbenih aktov sprejme pravila glede vzpostavitve in delovanja nacionalne mreže za podeželje.“
"The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts , adopt rules concerning the establishment and the operation of the national rural network."
Tehnična sprememba.
Technical change.
Člen 1 – točka 27 a (novo)
Article 1 - point 27 a (new)
Člen 69 – odstavek 5 d (novo)
Article 69 - paragraph 5 d (new)
(27a) Členu 69 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(27a) In Article 69, the following paragraph is added :
Ne glede na člen 29(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 se lahko izračun samodejnega preklica finančnih sredstev za države članice, ki se odločijo za regionalne programe, pripravi na ravni države članice.
Notwithstanding Art icle 29(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, for Member States that have opted for regional program me s, the calculation of the automatic cancellation of financial resources may be made at the level of the Member State .
Člen 1 – točka 29 – točka ba (novo)
Article 1 - point 29 - point b a (new)
Člen 71 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 2 – točka a
Article 71 - paragraph 3 - subparagraph 2 - point a
(ba) Točka (a) v drugem pododstavku odstavka 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(ba) In paragraph 3, point (a) of the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
" (a) DDV, razen nepovratni DDV, ki ga dejansko in dokončno plačajo upravičenci […] “
" ( a ) VAT, except non-recoverable VAT when it is genuinely and definitively borne by beneficiaries […] ."