natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
21. je prepričan, da bi lahko za odpravo ovir za evropski notranji trg in izboljšanje varnosti cestnega prometa Komisija spodbujala take usklajene zasnove kontrolnih pregledov in sprejemala regulativne ukrepe; poziva Komisijo, naj za dosego teh ciljev oblikuje učinkovit in ustrezen instrument usklajevanja na evropski ravni;
Believes that the Commission should develop and promote such harmonised approaches to checks and take regulatory action so as to remove obstacles to the European single market and improve road safety; calls on the Commission, in order to achieve these objectives, to create an effective and appropriate coordination instrument at the European level;
25. poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži poročilo o preverjanjih pomanjkljivosti, ki vplivajo na digitalne tahografe, in ukrepih za odpravljanje njihovih pomanjkljivosti;
Calls on the Commission to submit, as soon as possible, a report on the checks made on the shortcomings affecting digital tachographs and the steps taken to prevent their vulnerability;
29. je prepričan, da mora v okviru uporabe sodobnih sistemov informacijsko-komunikacijskih tehnologij in inteligentnih prevoznih sistemov obstajati možnost, da podjetja in vozniki pridobijo informacije o veljavnih socialnih predpisih in kaznih za njihovo kršitev;
Is convinced that in the context of using modern information and communication technologies and intelligent transport systems, the possibility should exist for businesses and drivers to obtain information on the social rules in force and the penalties for infringing them;
31. meni, da je treba za obveščanje voznikov tovornih vozil, tudi tistih iz sosednjih držav, v realnem času o ustreznih socialnih predpisih in kaznih, ki veljajo za kršitve v različnih državah članicah, uporabiti vso razpoložljivo tehnologijo, na primer z uporabo sistema GPS ali drugih razpoložljivih orodij;
Considers that all available technology should be used to inform lorry drivers, including those coming from neighbouring countries, in real time about the relevant social rules and the penalties applicable to infringements in the various Member States, for example with the use of GPS or other tools available;
33. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo in financirajo sheme za gradnjo varnih parkirišč, ki so nujna, da bi vozniki lahko upoštevali določbe iz Uredbe št. 561/2006;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage and finance schemes for the construction of secure parking areas, since these are indispensable if drivers are to respect the provisions of Regulation No 561/2006;
Komisija naj bi v skladu s členom 10 Direktive 2006/22/ES do 1. maja 2009 predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo, ki vsebuje analizo kazni, predpisanih za resne kršitve v skladu z zakonodajo držav članic.
Pursuant to Article 10 of Directive 2006/22/EC, the Commission was required to submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council by 1 May 2009 analysing the penalties for serious infringements provided for in the legislation of the Member States.
Poročevalka poziva Komisijo, naj v bodoče pravočasno in celovito obvešča Parlament.
Your rapporteur calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with full and timely information in future.
Poročilo Komisije ni le prepozno, ampak je tudi nepopolno.
The Commission's report is not only too late, but also incomplete.
Za natančno analizo je zlasti pomembno, da Komisija še letos posreduje Parlamentu in Svetu revidirano sporočilo, ki vsebuje analizo izvajanja nove priloge III k Direktivi 2006/22/ES v državah članicah.
For the purpose of detailed analysis, it is particularly important for the Commission to submit, before the end of this year, a revised communication to the Council and Parliament analysing the implementation of the new Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC in the Member States;
Poročilo Komisije povzema različne vrste kazni med državami članicami:
The Commission report summarises the various types of penalties laid down in the Member States:
· Denarne kazni: vse države članice obravnavajo denarne kazni kot eno od možnosti kaznovanja, vendar se zneski deloma zelo razlikujejo.
· Financial penalties : All the Member States provide for financial penalties as a possible sanction, although the amounts vary considerably.
Za isto kršitev se denarna kazen giblje od 58,23 EUR (Malta) do 5 000 EUR in več (Avstrija, Ciper, Nemčija in Irska).
The same offence can incur a penalty ranging between EUR 58.23 (Malta) and EUR 5 000 or more (Austria, Cyprus, Germany and Ireland).
Tako velike razlike lahko pripišemo socialnim, gospodarskim ali geografskim dejavnikom, vendar to utemeljevanje ne velja za vse države (Španija, Madžarska).
These wide disparities may be the result of social, economic or geographical factors, but this does not explain the situation in all the countries concerned (e.g. Spain and Hungary);
· Izločitev vozila iz prometa: izločitev vozila velja kot ena od dodatnih možnosti kaznovanja.
· Immobilisation of the vehicle : Immobilisation of the vehicle is a further possible penalty.
S tem ukrepom je tudi mogoče zagotoviti, da si voznik vzame dovolj časa za počitek.
This penalty can also ensure that the driver takes a sufficient rest period.
15 držav članic je Komisijo obvestilo, da je izločitev vozila iz prometa predpisana v njihovi zakonodaji (Bolgarija, Ciper, Češka republika, Nemčija, Danska, Grčija, Irska, Italija, Litva, Luksemburg, Poljska, Romunija, Španija, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo).
15 countries informed the Commission that their legislation provides for immobilisation (Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom);
V nekaterih državah članicah obstaja tudi možnost odvzema vozniškega dovoljenja ali vozniške kartice (Bolgarija, Danska, Grčija, Italija, Slovaška in Združeno kraljestvo)
Some Member States also provide for the possible withdrawal of driving licences or driver cards (Bulgaria, Denmark, Greece, Italy, Slovakia and the United Kingdom).
Poročilo poudarja tudi odgovornost podjetij v vseh državah članicah v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 561/2006.
The report also highlights the liability of undertakings in all the Member States, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 561/2006.
V zakonodaji večine držav članic (Belgija, Bolgarija, Nemčija, Danska, Estonija, Grčija, Finska, Madžarska, Irska, Italija, Litva, Latvija, Poljska, Romunija, Slovenija, Slovaška, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo) so določene različne kazni za voznike in podjetja, pri čemer so kazni za podjetja strožje in višje od tistih za voznike.
In the majority of Member States (Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom) the legislation includes different penalties for drivers and undertakings, the penalties for undertakings being higher or more severe than those for drivers.
V skladu s členom 10(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 morajo pošiljatelji, špediterji, organizatorji potovanj, glavni izvajalci, podizvajalci in agencije za zaposlovanje voznikov zagotoviti, da pogodbeno dogovorjeni načrti časa prevoza upoštevajo določbe o času vožnje in počitka.
Under Article 10(4) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, consignors, freight forwarders, tour operators, principal contractors, subcontractors and driver employment agencies must ensure that contractually agreed transport time schedules comply with the provisions on driving times and rest periods.
Vendar je ta obveznost izrecno opredeljena le v zakonodaji Danske, Estonije, Finske, Poljske in Švedske.
This obligation is only explicitly referred to in the national legislation of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Poland and Sweden.
Uredba (ES) št. 561/2006 uvaja tudi načelo eksteritorialnosti: kadar pristojne oblasti države članice ugotovijo kršitev in zanjo še ni bila izrečena kazen, je pristojnim oblastem omogočeno, da izrečejo kazen tudi, če je bila kršitev storjena na ozemlju druge države članice ali tretje države.
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 also introduced the principle of extra-territoriality : where the competent authorities in a Member State detect an infringement on the territory of another Member State or of a third country, they may impose a penalty provided that no penalty has already been imposed for that infringement.
Te kršitve se preganjajo tako, kot če bi bile storjene v državi članici, v kateri se izreče kazen.
Such infringements are penalised in the same way as if the infringement had been committed in the Member State imposing the penalty.
Kazen ne sme biti diskriminatorna.
There must be no discrimination as regards the penalty.
Nekatere države članice imajo kazenski sistem enakega obravnavanja pri izreku kazni (Avstrija, Češka republika, Irska, Luksemburg in Združeno kraljestvo), zaradi česar je težko analizirati kazni za resne kršitve, ker zakonodaja teh držav določa samo najnižje in najvišje kazni.
Some Member States have a penalty system without differentiation of penalties (Austria, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom), which makes it difficult to analyse the penalties for serious infringements, since these countries have listed only the minimum and maximum penalties.
Na Malti, na primer, za kršitve velja enotna globa (58,23 EUR).
Malta, for example, has a set fine for infringements (EUR 58.23).
Druge države imajo sisteme različnega obravnavanja pri izreku kazni:
Other countries have systems with differentiation of penalties:
· Zakonodaja teh držav v zvezi s kršitvami Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 (členi 6 do 8) loči za isto vrsto kršitve med dvema ali več stopnjami, pri čemer so za vsako stopnjo določene različne globe (glej preglednico I poročila).
· with regard to infringements against Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (Articles 6 to 8), two or more levels for the same kind of infringement are distinguished and specific fines are set for each level (see Table I of the report).
Poročilo prav tako kaže razlike v zneskih glob: globa za prekoračitev dnevnega časa vožnje za več kot dve uri je lahko v Španiji (4 600 EUR) desetkrat višja od globe v Grčiji (400 EUR).
The report also shows the differences in the amounts of the fines: the fine for exceeding the daily driving time by more than two hours can be ten times higher in Spain (EUR 4 600) than in Greece (EUR 400).
Tudi opredelitev stopenj je drugačna v posameznih državah članicah: različne meje so izražene ali v minutah in urah ali v odstotkih.
The Member States also use very different methods for determining the level: the various limits are expressed either in minutes, hours or as a percentage.
Kazni se lahko povečujejo linearno ali progresivno.
The rise in penalties can be either linear or progressive.
Druge države, kot je na primer Belgija, uporabljajo dve merili za izrek kazni: prekoračitev dnevnega časa vožnje in neprekinjenega časa vožnje.
Other countries such as Belgium use two criteria for determining the different levels: exceeding the daily driving times and uninterrupted driving time;
· Komisija v zvezi s kršitvami Uredbe (EGS) št. 3821/85 opaža, da znatne razlike obstajajo ne le pri višini glob, ampak tudi pri določanju stopenj kršitev (preglednica II).
· with regard to infringements against Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85, the Commission notes that there are significant differences not only in the level of fines but also in the way in which infringements are categorised (Table II).
Čeprav nova priloga III k Direktivi 2006/22/ES
Even though the new Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC
Pri tem je treba poudariti, da se poročilo Komisije sklicuje na podatke, ki so veljali pred začetkom veljavnosti nove priloge III k Direktivi 2006/22/ES. nekatere kršitve kategorizira kot „zelo resne“ – ko ima na primer voznik več veljavnih vozniških kartic –, nekatere države tak primer uvrščajo v kategorijo „manjših kršitev“.
It should be pointed out, however, that the Commission report is based on data for the period before the new Annex III of Directive 2006/22/EC came into force. categorises certain infringements as ‘very serious’ – for example where a driver holds more than one valid driver card – some Member States categorise this as a ‘minor infringement’.
Po drugi strani pa se tudi nekatere manjše kršitve v drugih državah kaznujejo z najvišjimi kazni.
On the other hand, some more minor infringements incur the highest level of penalty in other countries.
Višina glob za kršitve Uredbe (EGS) št. 3821/85 je zelo različna.
The amount of fines for infringements against Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 differs significantly.
Najvišje izrečene globe se lahko delno zelo razlikujejo in se gibljejo od 586 EUR (Litva) do 30 000 EUR (Francija, ob dodatni možnosti zapora).
In some cases, the maximum fines may range from EUR 586 (Lithuania) to EUR 30 000 (France, with the possibility of an additional prison sentence).
Če povzamemo, lahko rečemo ne samo, da se od države do države bistveno razlikuje višina kazni, ampak se razlikujejo tudi vrste predvidenih kazni ter kategorizacija posameznih kršitev socialnih predpisov.
To sum up, it can be noted that not only the level of fines differs greatly in the various Member States, but also the types of penalties and the categorisation of the various infringements against social rules.
Evropska komisija meni, da je to stanje nezadovoljivo za voznike in prevoznike.
The Commission considers this situation to be unsatisfactory for drivers and transport undertakings.
Nova priloga III k Direktivi 2006/22/ES (kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/5/ES) je podlaga za enotno razlago tega, kaj naj se šteje za resno kršitev in kaj ne.
The new Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC (amended by Directive 2009/5/EC) provides a basis for a general understanding of what should be considered as serious infringements and what should not.
Poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo potrebne korake, da zagotovijo usklajeno uporabo socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu.
Member States are encouraged to take the necessary steps to ensure the harmonised application of social rules in road transport.
Socialni predpisi v cestnem prometu so namenjeni uresničevanju različnih ciljev.
The social rules in road transport pursue a range of different objectives.
Varnost v cestnem prometu, izboljšanje pogojev dela in zagotovitev poštene konkurence so urejeni v različnih, deloma starih zakonodajnih besedilih.
Road transport safety, improved working conditions and guarantees of fair competition are regulated in various legislative texts, some of which go back several years.
Poročilo Komisije kaže, da pri izvajanju določb o časih vožnje in počitka ter predpisov o tahografu v posameznih državah članicah deloma obstajajo veliko razlike.
The Commission report shows that there are in some cases significant differences in the transposition of driving times and rest periods and of the rules relating to the tachograph in the various Member States.
– Izvajanje veljavnih predpisov
- Implementation of the existing provisions
Poročevalka meni, da popolno izvajanje socialnih predpisov v državah članicah ni le izredno pomembno za varnost v cestnem prometu na evropskih cestah, ampak tudi za evropski notranji trg.
Your rapporteur believes that the implementation in their entirety of the social rules in the Member States is not only of immense importance for road transport safety on Europe's roads, but is also of huge significance for the European single market.
– Enotna kategorizacija kršitev
- Uniform categorisation of infringements
Pozdraviti je treba kategorizacijo kršitev v novi prilogi III k Direktivi 2006/22/ES.
The categorisation contained in the new Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC is to be welcomed.
Države članice so zato pozvane, da to kategorizacijo prenesejo v svojo zakonodajo.
The Member States are now called upon to integrate this categorisation into their legislation.
– Pogostejša in temeljitejša preverjanja ter boljše sodelovanje držav članic pri izvajanju
- More frequent and more thorough checks, and better cooperation between Member States during implementation
Pri tem je zelo pomembno, da se preverja tudi upoštevanje predpisov.
In addition, it is absolutely essential that checks are indeed made of compliance with the regulations.
Nujno je treba povečati pogostost kontrolnih pregledov in jih čezmejno usklajevati.
They must be carried out more frequently and must be coordinated across frontiers.
Poleg tega je treba izboljšati sodelovanje med državami članicami pri izvajanju predpisov.
This will necessarily involve improved cooperation between the Member States in implementing the legislation.
Poročevalka zato poziva k ustanovitvi evropske agencije za cestni promet, ki bi usklajevala sodelovanje pristojnih organov ter tako izboljšala enotnost in celovitost preverjanj.
Your rapporteur therefore calls for the establishment of a European Road Transport Agency, which would be responsible for coordinating cooperation between the competent bodies and thereby for ensuring that the checks are more uniform and complete.
– Uskladitev kazni
- Harmonisation of penalties
V skladu s členom 19(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 morajo države članice določiti kazni za kršitve Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 in Uredbe (EGS) št. 3821/85, ki bodo učinkovite, sorazmerne, odvračilne in nediskriminatorne.
Article 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 requires Member States to lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of Regulations (EC) No 561/2006 and (EEC) No 3821/85 that are effective, proportionate, dissuasive and non-discriminatory.
Vseeno se v državah članicah kazni deloma močno razlikujejo.
However, these penalties vary, in some cases widely, between Member States.
Poročevalka želi poudariti, da lahko razlike v kaznih pripišemo več dejavnikom.
Your rapporteur would like to point out that the differences in penalties have arisen for several reasons.
Deloma gre razlike pripisati geografskim ali gospodarskim dejavnikom.
In part, they can be explained by geographic or economic conditions.
Seveda so lahko tudi različni pravni sistemi držav članic v kazenskih postopkih razlog za deloma znatne razlike v višini ali vrsti kazni.
But the varying legal systems in the Member States are also a factor in the often significant disparities in the level or the type of penalty.
Poročevalka meni, da je treba za primerljive kršitve uporabljati primerljive kazni.
Your rapporteur takes the view that comparable penalties should be applied to comparable infringements.
Ne glede na to je treba upoštevati, da so nekatere razlike neizogibne zaradi različnih nacionalnih okvirov.
Nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that some differences on grounds of differing national conditions are unavoidable.
V tem smislu mora Komisija preveriti nova zakonodajna sredstva, ki so bila uvedena z Lizbonsko pogodbo, ki vsebuje v Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije nov člen 83(2): „Če se izkaže, da je približevanje določb kazenske zakonodaje in drugih predpisov držav članic nujno zaradi zagotovitve učinkovitega izvajanja politike Unije na področju, za katerega veljajo usklajevalni ukrepi, se lahko z direktivami določijo minimalna pravila glede opredelitve kaznivih dejanj in sankcij na zadevnem področju.
With this in mind, the Commission should test the new legislative means introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon through the new Article 83/2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: 'If the approximation of criminal laws and regulations of the Member States proves essential to ensure the effective implementation of a Union policy in an area which has been subject to harmonisation measures, directives may establish minimum rules with regard to the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area concerned.
Takšne direktive se sprejmejo po enakem rednem ali posebnem zakonodajnem postopku, po katerem so bili sprejeti zadevni usklajevalni ukrepi, brez poseganja v člen 76.“
Such directives shall be adopted by the same ordinary or special legislative procedure as was followed for the adoption of the harmonisation measures in question, without prejudice to Article 76.'
Magdalena Alvarez, Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Carlo Fidanza, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Juozas Imbrasas, Ville Itälä, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Kumucakos (Georgios Koumoutsakos), Werner Kuhn, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Gesine Meissner, Hella Ranner, Vilja Savisaar, Olga Sehnalová, Debora Serracchiani, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Dominique Vlasto, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Magdalena Alvarez, Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Carlo Fidanza, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Juozas Imbrasas, Ville Itälä, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Werner Kuhn, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Gesine Meissner, Hella Ranner, Vilja Savisaar, Olga Sehnalová, Debora Serracchiani, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Dominique Vlasto, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
o vzpostavitvi skupnega programa EU za ponovno naselitev
on the establishment of a joint EU resettlement programme
– ob upoštevanju členov 78 in 80 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 78 and 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju mednarodnih in evropskih instrumentov za varstvo človekovih pravic, zlasti Konvencije Združenih narodov o statusu beguncev, Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP), Listine Unije o temeljnih pravicah (Listine) ter pravic in jamstev, ki jih podeljujejo beguncem in osebam, ki prosijo za mednarodno zaščito,
– having regard to international and European human rights instruments, in particular to the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter), and the rights and guarantees which they confer upon refugees and persons seeking international protection,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah in prvenstvene skrbi držav članic, da zaščitijo interese otrok,
– having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the primary concern of the Member States to protect the best interests of the child,
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije o prihodnjem skupnem evropskem azilnem sistemu ( KOM(2007)0301 ) z dne 6. junija 2007,
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper on the future Common European Asylum System ( COM(2007)0301 ) of 6 June 2007,
– ob upoštevanju načrta Komisije za politiko azila: celostni pristop k zaščiti v EU ( KOM(2008)0360 ) z dne 17. junija 2008,
– having regard to the Commission Policy Plan on Asylum: An integrated approach to protection across the EU ( COM(2008)0360 ) of 17 June 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov 2908. seje Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 28. novembra 2008 ((16325/1/08 REV 1 (Presse 344)), še zlasti glede sprejema iraških beguncev,
– having regard to the Conclusions of the 2908th meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Council on 28 November 2008 ((16325/1/08 REV 1 (Presse 344)) with special regard to the reception of Iraqi refugees,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o vzpostavitvi skupnega programa EU za ponovno naselitev ( KOM(2009)0447 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Establishment of a Joint EU Resettlement Programme ( COM(2009)0447 ),