natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju uredb Sveta o izvajanju Protokola št. 4 o jedrski elektrarni Ignalina v Litvi
– having regard to the Council Regulations on the implementation of Protocol No 4 on the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi finančnih sredstev, namenjenih razgradnji jedrskih objektov ( KOM(2007)0794 ), in priloženega dokumenta "Podatki o finančnih sredstvih za razgradnjo v EU" ( SEC(2007)1654 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the use of financial resources earmarked for the decommissioning of nuclear installations ( COM(2007)0794 ) and the accompanying document ‘EU decommissioning funding data’ ( SEC(2007)1654 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o upravljanju finančnih sredstev za razgradnjo jedrskih objektov
– having regard to the Commission Recommendation of 24 October 2006 on the management of financial resources for the decommissioning of nuclear installations
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0054/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0054/2011 ),
A. ker so v treh državah kandidatkah EU, v Litvi, na Slovaškem in v Bolgariji, obratovale stare jedrske elektrarne, za katere je bilo dogovorjeno, da se zaprejo, pristopna pogajanja pa so privedla do določitve datumov predčasnega zaprtja za enote v zadevnih treh jedrskih elektrarnah,
A. whereas the three EU candidate countries, Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria, operated old nuclear power plants (NPPs) which were agreed to be closed, and the accession negotiations led to early fixed closure dates for the units in the three NPPs concerned,
B. ker je EU priznala, da predčasno zaprtje in poznejša razgradnja teh enot v treh jedrskih elektrarnah predstavljata precejšnje finančno in gospodarsko breme, ki ga zadevne države članice ne bi mogle v celoti pokriti, zato je v pristopnih pogodbah in poznejših uredbah Sveta o izvajanju teh pogodb predvidela finančno pomoč za zadevne države članice, vendar ker ni bilo jasno odločeno, ali bi morala pomoč kriti celotne stroške razgradnje ali nadomestila za vse gospodarske posledice; ugotavlja, da tako Bolgarija kot Slovaška ostajata neto izvoznici električne energije,
B. whereas the EU recognised that the early shut-down and subsequent decommissioning of these units in the three NPPs represented a significant financial and economical burden which could not be fully covered by the Member States concerned, and therefore the Treaties of Accession, as well as subsequent Council Regulations for the implementation of these Treaties, provided for financial assistance to the respective Member States; whereas, however, it was not clearly decided whether the assistance should cover the full cost of decommissioning or compensate for all economic consequences; notes that both Bulgaria and Slovakia for the time being remain net exporters of electricity,
C. ker ukrepi pomoči zadevajo naslednja področja:
C. whereas the assistance provides for measures in the following areas:
· razgradnja (pripravljalna dela za zaprtje, podpora regulatorju, priprava potrebne dokumentacije za razgradnjo in izdajo licenc, varnost pri vzdrževanju in nadzor po zaprtju, predelava odpadkov, shranjevanje in dekontaminacija odpadkov in izrabljenega goriva ter delo v zvezi z razgradnjo),
· decommissioning (preparatory work for shutdown, support to the regulator, drawing up of documentation necessary for decommissioning and licensing, safe maintenance and surveillance after shutdown, waste treatment, waste and spent fuel storage and decontamination, and dismantling work),
· energija (modernizacija in okoljska nadgradnja obstoječih objektov, nadomestitev produkcijskih zmogljivosti zaprtih enot, izboljšanje varnosti oskrbe z energijo, izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti ter drugi ukrepi, ki prispevajo k nujnemu prestrukturiranju in posodobitvi energetske infrastrukture),
· energy (modernisation and environmental upgrading of existing facilities, replacement of the production capacity of shut-down units, improving security of energy supply and energy efficiency and other measures contributing to the necessary restructuring and upgrading of the energy infrastructure),
· socialne posledice (podpora, ki v obdobju po zaprtju in pred razgradnjo uslužbencem elektrarne pomaga vzdrževati visoko raven varnosti in omogoča prekvalificiranje osebja za nove naloge pri razgradnji),
· social consequences (support for plant personnel in maintaining a high level of safety in the periods prior to dismantling after closure, and re-training of staff for new tasks in decommissioning),
D. ker se je pomoč začela pred pridružitvijo in zaprtjem zadevnih enot, so se sredstva nabirala v okviru mednarodnih podpornih skladov za razgradnjo, medtem ko so se upravne priprave nadaljevale,
D. whereas the assistance started before accession and before the respective units were shut down, and funds accumulated within the International Decommissioning Support Funds (IDSFs) while administrative preparations continued,
E. ker je razgradnja jedrskih objektov in upravljanje njihovih odpadkov tehnično zapleten postopek, ki zahteva obsežna finančna sredstva, zanj pa je treba prevzeti okoljsko, tehnično, socialno in finančno odgovornost,
E. whereas the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and the management of their waste is a technically complex operation requiring substantial financial resources and involving environmental, technical, social and financial responsibilities,
3. ugotavlja, da obstaja pravna podlaga za dodelitev finančne pomoči; je seznanjen, da se zneski vsako leto določijo s sklepom Komisije na podlagi posameznih dokumentov o skupnem letnem načrtovanju, kar omogoča nadzor nad razvojem in financiranjem odobrenih projektov;
Notes the existence of a legal basis for granting the financial assistance; notes that the amounts are established annually through a Commission decision, based on individual annual combined programming documents, permitting control over the development and financing of the approved projects;
6. verjame, da načelo solidarnosti Evropske unije v resnici prispeva k blaženju gospodarskih posledic predčasnega zaprtja v energetskem sektorju; vendar ugotavlja, da je v času priprave tega poročila sama razgradnja še vedno v svoji začetni fazi;
Believes that the concept of European Union solidarity contributes effectively to mitigating the economic consequences of early closure in the energy sector; notes, however, that at the time of preparation of this report, the decommissioning itself is still in its initial stage;
8. izraža bojazen, da bo pomanjkanje finančnih virov za ukrepe razgradnje povzročilo zamude pri razgradnji jedrskih elektrarn ter ogrozilo okolje in zdravje ljudi;
Fears that a lack of financial resources for decommissioning measures will delay the decommissioning of nuclear power plants and threaten the environment and human health;
12. opaža pomanjkanje jasne razdelitve odgovornosti med udeleženci pri financiranju in udeleženci pri postopku razgradnje; meni, da bi Komisija morala imeti glavno odgovornost za izplačevanje pomoči EU in da bi bilo treba vzpostaviti skupno upravljanje z Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj;
Notes the lack of a clear distribution of responsibility among the participants in the financing and the participants in the process of decommissioning; believes that the Commission should bear the main responsibility for the implementation of the EU assistance and that a joint management with the EBRD should be put in place;
16. meni, da je treba poskrbeti za popolno preglednost upravljanja skladov in uporabe njihovih sredstev; priznava pomen dobrega in preglednega upravljanja finančnih sredstev z ustreznim zunanjim nadzorom za zagotovitev pravične konkurence na energetskem trgu; na tem področju priporoča preglednost in javno sodelovanje;
Considers it necessary for the funds to be managed and their resources to be used with absolute transparency; recognises the importance of sound and transparent management of financial resources, with appropriate external supervision, to ensure fair competition on the energy market; recommends transparency and public participation in this field;
22. poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o posebnih izboljšavah po ustanovitvi upravnega odbora države članice leta 2007, da bi Komisiji zagotavljal pomoč pri izvajanju programov pomoči, ter poroča o postopkovnih spremembah, ki so se od takrat pojavile;
Invites the Commission to report on the particular improvements stemming from the establishment of a Member State Management Committee in 2007 to assist it in the implementation of the assistance programmes, and to give an account of the procedural changes since that time;
· ali so bila sredstva uporabljena za namene, za katere so bila dodeljena,
· whether the funds were used for the purposes for which they were intended,
· ali so bili postopki javnih naročil ustrezno pripravljeni in spoštovani,
· whether procurement procedures were properly drawn up and respected,
· ali je dodeljeni denar prispeval k povečanju varnosti pri dejavnosti razgradnje,
· whether the money allocated contributed to increasing safety in the decommissioning activity;
· ali so postopki javnih naročil zagotovili, da bodo udeležena podjetja zagotovila varnost po standardih EU,
· whether the procurement procedures ensured that the companies involved will provide safety to EU standards,
· ali obstajajo dejavnosti, pri katerih je udeležen OLAF,
· whether there are activities where OLAF is involved,
· ali je med tremi obstoječimi programi potekalo ustrezno usklajevanje, da bi učinkovito uporabili pridobljene izkušnje in predhodno pripravljene ter financirane projekte, v katerih vidikih so se programi za razgradnjo prekrivali (na primer obstaja več podobnih projektov v zvezi s skladiščenjem, usposobljenostjo osebja itd., ki bi jih lahko prilagodili glede na posamezno JE, kar bi omogočilo prihranke);
· whether proper coordination among the three existing programmes occurred, in order to make efficient use of experience gained and of previously prepared and financed projects, and in what regards the decommissioning programmes overlapped (given, for example, that there are several similar projects related to storage, personnel qualification, etc which could have been adapted from one NPP to another, leading to savings);
· ali so že obstoječi načrti in strategije zaključeni ter ali še vedno obstaja možnost dodajanja novih dejavnosti in posledično dodatnih sredstev,
· whether the already existing plans and strategies are complete or whether the possibility of adding new activities and subsequently additional funds still exists,
· ali so celotne zmogljivosti za začasno skladiščenje in postopek izbire končnega domačega odlagališča za končne radioaktivne odpadke zaključeni ali ne,
· whether the overall temporary storage capacity, and a procedure to select a final domestic disposal site for final radioactive waste, are complete or not,
· ali je še vedno potrebno dodeliti dodatna sredstva za energetske projekte ali se je potrebno osredotočiti na projekte razgradnje,
· whether there is still a need for further amounts to be allocated for energy projects or whether it is necessary to focus on the decommissioning projects,
· ali bi bilo treba v primeru, da to do zdaj ni veljalo, izkušnje in projekte, uporabljene za eno JE, prenesti tudi na druge;
· whether, in the event that this has not been the case so far, the experience and projects used for one NPP should be carried over to the others as well;
· nadzor izdelave končnega načrta z jasnim časovnim razporedom,
· supervising the elaboration of a final plan with a clear timetable,
· nadzor uporabe doslej dodeljenega denarja,
· supervising the use of money allocated so far,
· ugotavljanje, ali je potrebna dodatna vloga EU, in, če je odgovor pritrdilen, določitev natančne ravni njene udeležbe,
· establishing whether there is further need for an EU role and if so, determining the exact level of EU involvement,
· odločanje o odgovornostih, vključno z vlogo Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj, ter nadzor dokončnega oblikovanja procesa razgradnje;
· deciding upon responsibilities, including the role of the EBRD, and overseeing the finalisation of the decommissioning process;
31. pozdravlja dejstvo, da se večina projektov programa Ignalina za energetsko učinkovitost in zagotavljanje oskrbe z električno energijo trenutno izvaja ali je že bila izvedena;
Welcomes the fact that most of the Ignalina programme’s projects for energy efficiency and securing of the electricity supply are currently under implementation or have already been implemented;
33. ugotavlja, da je bil velik del sredstev dodeljen za energetske projekte, da je še vedno potrebno znatno financiranje za razgradnjo in da državna sredstva ne zadostujejo za kritje: državni sklad za razgradnjo JE Ignaline je do zdaj zbral ravno nekaj več kot 100 milijonov EUR (medtem ko tehnični stroški same razgradnje znašajo med 987 milijonov EUR in 1.300 milijonov EUR), znaten delež tega pa je bil uporabljen za projekte, ki niso povezani z razgradnjo; poziva, da se s tem v zvezi sprejmejo ustrezni ukrepi, zlasti s strani države članice;
Notes that a large part of the funds was allocated to energy projects, that considerable financing is still required for decommissioning and that national funds are not sufficient to cover this: the State Ignalina NPP Decommissioning Fund has so far accumulated just over EUR 100 million (while the technical costs of decommissioning alone range from EUR 987 million to EUR 1 300 million), and a significant proportion of that has been used on non-decommissioning projects; calls for appropriate measures to be taken in this respect, particularly by the Member State;
Jedrska elektrarna Bohunice
Bohunice NPP
37. pozdravlja splošno dobro tehnično in finančno izvršitev programa Kozloduj in revizijo strategije za razgradnjo enot od 1 do 4, ki se je spremenila iz začetne strategije odložene razgradnje v strategijo takojšnje trajne razgradnje;
Welcomes the overall good technical and financial performance of the Kozloduy programme, and the review of the decommissioning strategy for Units 1 to 4, which was changed from an initial deferred dismantling strategy to an immediate continuous dismantling strategy;
V treh državah, v Litvi, na Slovaškem in v Bolgariji, so obratovali stari jedrski reaktorji sovjetske izdelave, za katere je mednarodna skupnost, v skladu z večstranskim programom ukrepov skupine G7, sprejetim na vrhunskem srečanju skupine v Münchnu leta 1992, prišla do zaključka, da se jih ne da posodobiti, da bi dosegli zahtevane minimalne varnostne standarde s sprejemljivimi gospodarskimi izdatki.
The three countries, Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria, operated old soviet design nuclear reactors which the international community, in line with the G7 multilateral programme of action adopted at the Munich G7 summit in 1992, concluded could not be upgraded to meet the minimum required safety standards at an economically acceptable cost.
V okviru pogajanj za pristop k Evropski uniji so se te tri države obvezale, da bodo zaprle in nato na določene datume razgradile te jedrske reaktorje.
In the context of the negotiations for accession to the European Union, the three countries took the commitment to close and subsequently decommission these nuclear reactors on fixed dates.
Ker predčasno zaprtje predstavlja izredno finančno breme, se je Evropska unija iz solidarnosti zavezala, da bo ponudila zadostno dodatno finančno pomoč za razgradnjo teh jedrskih elektrarn do konca leta 2013.
In recognition of the fact that the early closure represented an exceptional financial burden, and as act of solidarity the European Union committed itself to provide adequate additional financial assistance for decommissioning of these reactor units until the end of 2013.
V predpristopnem obdobju je bila za Litvo in Slovaško predvidena pomoč prek programa PHARE
In the pre-accession period assistance was provided to Lithuania and Slovakia through the PHARE
Program pomoči državam srednje in vzhodne Evrope , v obdobju 2004–2006 je bila pomoč predvidena v protokolih k aktu o pristopu, in od leta 2007 dalje uredbe Sveta o Litvi
Programme of aid to central and east European countries programme, between 2004-2006 assistance was provided under the Protocols to the Act of Accession and since 2007, Council Regulations for Lithuania
Pregled finančne pomoči državam članicam od leta 1999 do leta 2013 (v milijonih EUR), kot je določeno v temeljnih pravnih aktih (dejanske letne obveznosti so prilagojene zaradi inflacije):
Overaew of the financial assistance to the Member States from 1999 to 2013 ( € million) as anchored in the basic legal acts (actual yearly commitments adjusted for inflation):
Ob koncu leta 2009 so dejanski dodeljeni zneski za te tri države znašali: 878,5 milijonov EUR za Litvo, 363,7 milijonov EUR za Slovaško in 567,8 milijonov EUR za Bolgarijo.
By the end of 2009 the actual committed amounts to the three countries were: €878,5 million for Lithuania, €363,7 million for Slovakia and €567,8 million for Bulgaria.
V protokolu št. 4
In Accession treaty Protocol No 4
V obdobju 2004–2006 je Skupnost Litvi zagotovila dodatno finančno pomoč v podporo njenim naporom v zvezi z razgradnjo in za odpravljanje posledic zaprtja in razgradnje.
During the period 2004-2006, the Community had to provide Lithuania with additional financial assistance in support of its efforts to decommission and to address the consequences of the closure and decommissioning.
Pomoč za obdobje 2004–2006 je znašala 285 milijonov EUR (320 milijonov EUR po prilagoditvi zaradi inflacije).
The assistance had to amount to EUR 285 million for the period 2004-2006 (€320 million after adjustments for inflation).
Namenjena je bila ukrepom za razgradnjo, okoljski nadgradnji v skladu s pravnim redom, modernizaciji za izboljšanje proizvodne zmogljivosti in drugim ukrepom, ki so sledili odločitvi o zaprtju in razgradnji elektrarne, prispevali pa naj bi k potrebnemu prestrukturiranju, okoljski nadgradnji, modernizaciji proizvodnje, prenosa in distribucije energije, večji zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo in boljši energetski učinkovitosti v Litvi.
The assistance was to cover measures in support of the decommissioning ; measures for the environmental upgrading in line with the acquis, modernisation measures of conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity, and other measures which were consequential to the decision to close and decommission this plant, contributing to the necessary restructuring, environmental upgrading and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors and enhancing the security of energy supply and improving energy efficiency in Lithuania.
Pomoč je bila prav tako namenjena ukrepom, ki so v obdobju pred zaprtjem in med razgradnjo reaktorjev uslužbencem elektrarne pomagali vzdrževati visoko raven varnosti obratovanja jedrske elektrarne Ignalina.
Assistance was to include measures supporting plant personnel in maintaining a high level of operational safety at the Ignalina NPPin the periods prior to the closure and during the decommissioning.
931. pristopne pogodbe se je Slovaška zavezala, da bo reaktor 1 jedrske elektrarne Bohunice V1 zaprla najpozneje 31. decembra 2006 in reaktor 2 najpozneje 31. decembra 2008, nato pa oba razgradila.
931 Slovakia commits to close Unit 1 of the Bohunice V1 NPP by 31 December 2006 and Unit 2 by 31 December 2008 at the latest and to subsequently decommission these units.
V obdobju 2004–2006 je Skupnost Slovaški zagotovila finančno pomoč za razgradnjo in za odpravljanje posledic zaprtja in razgradnje.
During the period 2004-2006, the Community had to provide Slovakia with financial assistance in support of its efforts to decommission and to address the consequences of the closure and decommissioning.
Pomoč za obdobje 2004–2006 je znašala 90 milijonov EUR.
The assistance had to amount to EUR 90 million for the period 2004-2006.
Pomoč je bila določena in izplačana v skladu z določbami iz Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3906/89 z dne 18. decembra 1989 o gospodarski pomoči nekaterim državam srednje in vzhodne Evrope
The assistance had to be decided and implemented in accordance with the provisions laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 of 18 December 1989 on economic aid to certain countries of Central and Eastern Europe
Pri odločitvah o nadaljevanju pomoči EU na tem področju po letu 2006 je bilo treba upoštevati, da se bo razgradnja jedrske elektrarne Bohunice V1 nadaljevala še po izteku takratne finančne perspektive in da je precejšnje finančno breme za Slovaško.
Decisions on the continuation of EU assistance in this field after 2006 were to take into account that the decommissioning of the Bohunice V1 NPP would have to continue beyond the financial perspective of that time and that it represented a significant financial burden for Slovakia.
Člen 30 protokola o pogojih in podrobnostih sprejema republik Bolgarije in Romunije v Evropsko unijo
Article 30 of the Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
V obdobju 2007–2009 je Skupnost Bolgariji zagotovila finančno pomoč za razgradnjo in za odpravljanje posledic zaprtja in razgradnje reaktorjev 1 do 4 jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj.
During the period 2007-2009, the Community had to provide Bulgaria with financial assistance in support of its efforts to decommission and to address the consequences of the closure and decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy NPP.
Pomoč je znašala 210 milijonov EUR (v cenah iz leta 2004), obveznosti zanjo pa naj bi bile prevzete v enakih letnih obrokih v znesku 70 milijonov EUR (v cenah iz leta 2004) v obdobju 2007–2009.
The assistance had to amount to EUR 210 million (2004 prices), to be committed in equal annual tranches of EUR 70 million (2004 prices) for the period 2007-2009.
Namenjena je bila ukrepom za razgradnjo, okoljski nadgradnji v skladu s pravnim redom, modernizaciji za izboljšanje konvencionalne proizvodnje, prenosa in distribucije energije, ukrepom za boljšo energetsko učinkovitost, ukrepom za obsežnejšo uporabo obnovljivih virov energije in večji zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo v Bolgariji.
The assistance was to cover measures in support of the decommissioning, measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis; measures for the modernisation of the conventional energy production, transmission and distribution sectors, measures to improve energy efficiency, measures enhancing the use of renewable energy sources and improving security of energy supply in Bulgaria.
Evropski svet je v letih 2006 in 2007 sprejel novi uredbi za Litvo
In 2006 and 2007 the European Council adopted a new Regulation for Lithuania
9. pa od sredine leta 2010 ponuja pravno podlago za dodatno pomoč Evropske unije Bolgariji v obdobju 2010–2013.
OJ L 189, 13.7.2010, p.9 provides the legal basis for additional European Union assistance to Bulgaria for 2010 – 2013.
Upravljanje, revizija in nadzor
Management, audit and control
Finančna pomoč Evropske unije se lahko izplača kot prispevek trem mednarodnim podpornim skladom za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn, ki jih upravlja Evropska banka za obnovo in razvoj.
The European Union financial assistance has been made available in the form of contributions to three International Decommissioning Support Funds managed by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Poleg tega je bil od leta 2004 del finančne pomoči za Litvo na voljo kot neposredna podpora državi za izvajanje določb člena 2.4
In addition, since 2004, part of the financial assistance for Lithuania has also been made available as a direct support to the country in order to implement provisions of Art. 2.4