natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V členu 18 se v tretjem pododstavku besedilo "pod pogojem, da se delavcem dodeli enakovreden nadomestni počitek" nadomesti z besedilom "pod pogojem, da se zadevnim delavcem dodeli enakovreden nadomestni počitek v razumnem roku, ki se določi z nacionalno zakonodajo ali v kolektivni pogodbi ali sporazumu med socialnimi partnerji".
In Article 18, in the third paragraph, the words "on condition that equivalent compensating rest periods are granted to the workers concerned" shall be replaced by "on condition that equivalent compensating rest periods are granted to the workers concerned within a reasonable period, to be determined by national legislation or a collective agreement or an agreement concluded between the social partners ".
V členu 18 se v tretjem pododstavku besedilo "pod pogojem, da se delavcem dodeli enakovreden nadomestni počitek" nadomesti z besedilom "pod pogojem, da se zadevnim delavcem dodeli enakovreden nadomestni počitek po obdobju dela, v skladu z ustreznim zakonom, kolektivno pogodbo ali drugim sporazumom med socialnimi partnerji".
In Article 18, in the third paragraph, the words "on condition that equivalent compensating rest periods are granted to the workers concerned" shall be replaced by "on condition that equivalent compensating rest periods are granted to the workers concerned following periods of time spent on duty, in accordance with the relevant law, collective agreement or other agreement between the two sides of industry ".
Člen 19 – odstavek 1 ‑ točka b
Article 19 – paragraph 1 ‑ point b
(b) z zakoni ali drugimi predpisi po posvetovanju socialnih partnerjev na ustrezni ravni.
(b) by legislative or regulatory provision following consultation of the social partners at the appropriate level.
(b) z zakoni ali drugimi predpisi po posvetovanju socialnih partnerjev na ustrezni ravni v primerih, ko delavci niso vključeni v kolektivno pogodbo ali drug sporazum med socialnimi partnerji, pri čemer zadevna država članica sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, da zagotovi, da:
(b) by legislative or regulatory provision following consultation of the social partners at the appropriate level , in cases where workers are not covered by collective agreements or other agreements between the two sides of industry, provided that the Member State concerned takes the necessary measures to ensure that :
– delodajalec obvesti delavce in/ali njihove predstavnike ter se z njimi posvetuje o vpeljavi predlaganega vzorca delovnega časa in morebitnih prilagoditvah;
- the employer informs and consults with workers and/or their representatives about the introduction of the proposed working time pattern and alterations thereto;
– delodajalec sprejme potrebne ukrepe za preprečevanje in/ali odpravo zdravstvenih ali varnostnih tveganj, ki so povezana s predlaganim vzorcem delovnega časa .
- the employer takes the necessary measures to prevent and/or remedy any health and safety risks that may be related to the proposed working time pattern .
Namen je uravnoteženje potreb po prožnosti in varnosti podjetij in delavcev.
To strike a balance between employers' and workers' flexibility and safety needs.
Čeprav je po splošnem načelu najdaljši tedenski delovni čas v Evropski uniji 48 ur in v praksi delavci v Uniji delajo dlje le izjemoma, se lahko države članice, ob spoštovanju potrebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev dejanskega varovanja zdravja in varnosti delavcev , odločijo, da člena 6 ne bodo uporabljale.
Although the general principle is that the maximum weekly working time in the European Union is 48 hours and that in practice it is an exception for workers in the Union to work longer, Member States may decide not to apply Article 6 provided that they take the necessary measures to ensure the effective protection of the safety and health of workers.
Izvajanje te možnosti se izrecno določi v kolektivni pogodbi ali sporazumu med socialnimi partnerji na ustrezni ravni ali z nacionalno zakonodajo po posvetovanju s socialnimi partnerji na primerni ravni.
Implementation of this option, however, shall be expressly laid down by a collective agreement or an agreement between the social partners at the appropriate level or by national law following consultation of the social partners at the appropriate level.
Čeprav je po splošnem načelu najdaljši tedenski delovni čas v Evropski uniji 48 ur in v praksi delavci v Uniji delajo dlje le izjemoma, se lahko države članice, ob spoštovanju potrebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev dejanskega varovanja zdravja in varnosti delavcev, odločijo, da v prehodnem obdobju, ki preteče 36 mesecev po začetku veljave Direktive 2008/…/… , člena 6 ne bodo uporabljale.
Although the general principle is that the maximum weekly working time in the European Union is 48 hours and that in practice it is an exception for workers in the Union to work longer, Member States may decide not to apply Article 6 during a transitional period end ing 36 months after the entry into force of Directive 2008 /.../... provided that they take the necessary measures to ensure the effective protection of the safety and health of workers.
Namen je odpraviti klavzulo, ki zmanjšuje varovanje zdravja in varnosti delavcev ter neodtujljivost temeljnih pravic, in spoštovati učinek mednarodnih konvencij ILO, zakonodajo na socialnem področju ter sporazume med socialnimi partnerji v državah članicah.
To do away with a provision that undermines worker health and safety protection and the inalienability of fundamental rights and to maintain the force of ILO agreements and the social legislation and agreements between the two sides of industry in the Member States.
Člen 22 – odstavek 2 ‑ točka a
Article 22 – paragraph 2 ‑ point a
(a) noben delodajalec od delavca ne zahteva, da dela več kot 48 ur v sedmih dneh, izračunano kot povprečje v okviru referenčnega obdobja iz člena 16(b), razen če prej ne pridobi soglasja delavca za opravljanje takšnega dela.
(a) no employer requires a worker to work more than 48 hours over a seven-day period, calculated as an average for the reference period referred to in Article 16(b), unless he has first obtained the worker's agreement to perform such work.
To soglasje velja največ eno leto in se lahko podaljša;
This agreement shall be valid for a period not exceeding one year and shall be renewable;
Namen je okrepiti svobodno izražanje delavca v prehodnem obdobju.
To give workers a greater say during the transitional period.
Člen 22 – odstavek 2 – točka c - točka i
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point c - point i
(i) podpisu individualne pogodbe o zaposlitvi; ali
(i) the time of the signature of the individual employment contract; or
Člen 22 – odstavek 2 – točka d
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) noben delavec, ki je dal soglasje v skladu s tem členom, v sedmih dneh ne dela več kot:
( d) no worker who has given an agreement under this Article shall, over a period of seven days, work more than:
(i) 60 ur, izračunano kot povprečje v obdobju treh mesecev, razen če je v kolektivni pogodbi ali sporazumu med socialnimi partnerji določeno drugače; ali
(i) 60 hours, calculated as an average over a period of three months, unless otherwise provided for in a collective agreement or an agreement between the social partners; or
(ii) 65 ur, izračunano kot povprečje v obdobju treh mesecev, če kolektivna pogodba ni sklenjena in če se neaktivni del časa dežurstva obravnava kot delovni čas v skladu s členom 2a;
(ii) 65 hours, calculated as an average over a period of three months, in the absence of a collective agreement and when the inactive part of on-call time is regarded as working time in accordance with Article 2a;
Če je delavec zaposlen pri istem delodajalcu za obdobje ali obdobja, ki skupaj ne presežejo deset tednov v obdobju dvanajstih mesecev, se določbe iz odstavka 2(c)(ii) in (d) odstavka 1a ne uporabijo, v kolikor so spoštovana splošna načela varovanja zdravja in varnosti delavcev."
Subject to compliance with the general principles relating to the protection of the safety and health of workers, where a worker is employed by the same employer for a period or periods that do not exceed ten weeks in total over a period of twelve months, the provisions of paragraph 2(c)(ii) and (d) shall not apply."
Namen je zagotoviti zaščito milijonov evropskih delavcev s pogodbami za določen čas, ki so v novem besedilu Sveta popolnoma nezaščiteni.
To ensure due protection for the millions of European workers who are on temporary contacts and to whom the Council's wording affords no protection whatsoever.
Člen 22 a
Article 22a
(7) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(7) The following Article shall be inserted:
"Člen 22a
"Article 22a
Posebne določbe
Special provisions
Če država članica uporabi možnost iz člena 22:
When a Member State makes use of the option provided for by Article 22:
(a) se možnost iz točke (b) prvega odstavka člena 19 ne uporabi;
(a) the option set out under point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 19 shall not apply;
(b) ta država članica lahko z odstopanjem od člena 16(b) in iz objektivnih ali tehničnih razlogov ali iz razlogov, ki zadevajo organizacijo dela, z zakoni ali drugimi predpisi dovoli, da referenčno obdobje ne presega šest mesecev.
(b) that Member State may, by way of derogation from Article 16(b) and for objective or technical reasons or reasons concerning the organisation of work, allow, by means of laws, regulations or administrative provisions, the reference period to be set at a period not exceeding six months.
Takšno referenčno obdobje spoštuje splošna načela varnosti in zdravja delavcev in ne vpliva na trimesečno referenčno obdobje, ki se v skladu s členom 22(2)(d) uporablja za delavce, ki so skladno s členom 22(2)(a) v zvezi s tem dali veljavno soglasje."
Such a reference period shall be subject to compliance with the general principles relating to the protection of the health and safety of workers, and shall not affect the three-month reference period applicable under Article 22(2)(d) to workers who have entered into a valid subsisting agreement under Article 22(2)(a)."
Referenčno obdobje ni pomembno za tiste, ki uporabijo možnost odstopanja, saj zanje ne obstaja nobena omejitev trajanja tedenskega delovnega časa.
This provision is totally meaningless because the reference period is irrelevant to anyone taking up the opt-out, since there is no limit on the working week.
(9) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(9) The following Article shall be inserted:
"Člen 24a
"Article 24a
(a) države članice, ki uporabijo možnost iz člena 22(1), po posvetovanju s socialnimi partnerji na nacionalni ravni obvestijo Komisijo o razlogih, sektorju(-ih), dejavnostih in številu zadevnih delavcev.
(a) Member States which make use of the option under Article 22(1) shall inform the Commission of the reasons, the sector(s), activities and numbers of workers concerned, after consulting the social partners at national level.
Poročilo vsake od držav članic vsebuje informacije o učinkih na zdravje in varnost delavcev ter navaja stališča socialnih partnerjev na ustrezni ravni, predloži pa se tudi socialnim partnerjem na nacionalni ravni;
The report by each Member State shall give information on its effects on workers' health and safety as well as indicating the viewpoints of the social partners at appropriate level, and shall also be submitted to the social partners at national level;
(b) države članice, ki uporabijo možnost iz točke (b) prvega odstavka člena 19, Komisijo obvestijo o načinu izvajanja te določbe in o njegovem učinku na zdravje in varnost delavcev.
(b) Member States which make use of the option under point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 19 shall inform the Commission of the manner in which they have implemented this provision, and of its effects on workers' health and safety.
Do … * Komisija po posvetovanju s socialnimi partnerji na ravni Skupnosti Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru predloži poročilo o:
By ...*, the Commission shall, after consulting the social partners at Community level, submit to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on:
(a) uporabi možnosti iz člena 22(1) in razlogih za njeno uporabo ter
(a) the use of the option under Article 22(1) and the reasons for that use, and
(b) drugih dejavnikih, ki bi lahko vplivali na veliko število delovnih ur, denimo uporaba točke (b) prvega odstavka člena 19.
(b) other factors which may contribute to long working hours, such as the use of point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 19.
Poročilu lahko priloži ustrezne predloge za zmanjšanje prekomernih delovnih ur, vključno z uporabo možnosti iz člena 22(1), ob upoštevanju vplivov na zdravje in varnost delavcev, ki jih zajema ta možnost.
The report may be accompanied by appropriate proposals to reduce excessive working hours, including the use of the option under Article 22(1), taking into account its impact on the health and safety of the workers covered by this option.
Svet na podlagi poročila iz odstavka 2 oceni uporabo možnosti iz te direktive, zlasti pa možnosti iz točke (b) prvega odstavka člena 19 in člena 22(1).
The Council shall, on the basis of the report referred to in paragraph 2, evaluate the use of the options provided by this Directive and namely those laid down in point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 19 and Article 22(1).
Komisija lahko ob upoštevanju te ocene do ...** Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu po potrebi predlaga spremembo te direktive, vključno z možnostjo iz člena 22(1)."
Taking into account this evaluation, the Commission may, by ...**, if appropriate, submit a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council to amend this Directive, including the option laid down in Article 22(1)."
Ko se odstopanje izteče, ni smiselno pripravljati poročila o oceni.
There is no point in submitting an evaluation report once the opt-out has ended.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varnosti igrač
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the safety of toys
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................79
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 83
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ...........................137
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy .............144
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varnosti igrač
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the s afety of t oys
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0009 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0009 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6–0039/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0039/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenj Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6–0441/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0441/2008 ),
(2) Direktiva 88/378/EGS temelji na načelih novega pristopa, kot je določeno v Resoluciji Sveta z dne 7. maja 1985 o novem pristopu k tehnični uskladitvi in standardom.
(2) Directive 88/378/EEC is based on the New Approach principles, as set out in the Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonisation and standards.
Tako določa samo osnovne varnostne zahteve v zvezi z igračami, medtem ko tehnične podrobnosti sprejemata evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN) in evropski odbor za elektrotehnično standardizacijo (CENELEC) v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov.
Thus, it sets out only the essential safety requirements with regard to toys, while technical details are adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) and the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation (CENELEC) in accordance with Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations.
Skladnost s tako določenimi usklajenimi standardi, katerih referenčna številka je objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, predpostavlja domnevo o skladnosti z zahtevami iz Direktive 88/378/EGS.
Conformity with harmonised standards so set, the reference number of which is published in the Official Journal of the European Union, provides presumption of conformity to the requirements of Directive 88/378/EEC.
Izkušnje kažejo, da so bila ta osnovna načela v sektorju igrač učinkovita in jih je treba ohraniti.
Experience has shown that these basic principles have worked well in the toys sector and should be maintained.
Tako določa osnovne varnostne zahteve v zvezi z igračami, vključno s posebnimi varnostnimi zahtevami glede fizikalnih in mehanskih lastnosti, vnetljivosti, kemičnih in elektičnih lastnosti, higiene in radioaktivnosti.
Thus, it sets out the essential safety requirements with regard to toys, including the particular safety requirements regarding physical and mechanical properties, flammability, chemical properties, electrical properties, hygiene and radioactivity.
Tehnične podrobnosti sprejemata evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN) in evropski odbor za elektrotehnično standardizacijo (CENELEC) v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov.
Technical details are adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) and the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation (CENELEC) in accordance with Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations.
Poleg zahtev iz člena 9 direktive osnovne varnostne zahteve vključujejo tudi posebne varnostne zahteve iz Priloge II.
The essential safety requirements include not only the requirements mentioned in Article 9 of the Directive, but also the specific safety requirements mentioned in the Annex II.
Prav tako se je glede na nedavno odkrite varnostne težave z igračami težko pretvarjati, da v sektorju igrač vse dobro deluje.
Moreover, given the safety problems recently encountered with toys, it is difficult to pretend that things have worked well in the toys sector.
(3a) Še eden od pomembnih ciljev novega sistema, ki naj bi ga vzpostavila ta direktiva, je spodbuditi in v nekaterih primerih zagotoviti, da se nevarne snovi in materiali, uporabljeni v igračah, nadomestijo z manj nevarnimi snovmi ali tehnologijami, če so na voljo druge ustrezne ekonomsko in tehnično izvedljive možnosti.
(3a) Another important objective of the new system to be established by this Directive is to encourage and in certain cases to ensure that dangerous substances and materials used in toys are replaced by less dangerous substances or technologies where suitable economically and technically viable alternatives are available.
Predlog spremembe je prilagoditev uredbi REACH (uvodna izjava 12).
This amendment is an adaptation to the REACH Regulation (recital 12).
(3b)Previdnostno načelo je načelo prava Skupnosti, vsebovano v sodni praksi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in natančneje opredeljeno v sporočilu Komisije z dne 2. februarja 2000 o previdnostnem načelu ( KOM(2000)0001 ).
(3b)The precautionary principle is a principle of Community law contained in jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and specified in the Communication from the Commission of 2 February 2000 on the precautionary principle ( COM(2000)0001 ) .
(8) Vsi gospodarski subjekti, ki sodelujejo v dobavni in distribucijski verigi, bi morali sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da so na trgu dostopne samo tiste igrače, ki so v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo.
(8) All economic operators intervening in the supply and distribution chain should take the appropriate measures to ensure that they make available on the market only toys which are in conformity with the applicable legislation.
Ta direktiva predpisuje jasno in sorazmerno delitev obveznosti, ki ustreza vlogi vsakega subjekta v postopku proizvodnje in distribucije.
This Directive provides a clear and proportionate distribution of obligations which correspond to the respective role of each operator in the supply and distribution process.
(8) Vsi gospodarski subjekti, ki sodelujejo v dobavni in distribucijski verigi, delujejo z vso odgovornostjo in zahtevano skrbnostjo, da v predvidljivih pogojih običajne uporabe zagotovijo, da igrače, ki jih dajejo na trg, nimajo nevarnih učinkov na varnost in zdravje otrok.
(8) All economic operators intervening in the supply and distribution chain should exercise the responsibility and vigilance required to ensure that under normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of use the toys they place on the market do not jeopardise the safety and health of children.
Gospodarski subjekti bi morali sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da so na trgu dostopne samo tiste igrače, ki so v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo.
Economic operators should take the appropriate measures to ensure that they make available on the market only toys which are in conformity with the applicable legislation.
Zgolj določba, da morajo gospodarski subjekti sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe, ni dovolj.
Simply stating that economic operators should take appropriate measures is not enough.
Jasno je treba izraziti tudi, da morajo biti odgovorni.
It should also be made clear that they are liable.
Zato morajo gospodarski subjekti posebno pozornost namenjati zagotavljanju zdravja in varnosti otrok, ki njihove igrače uporabljajo, upoštevati pa morajo tudi morebitno različno rabo igrač.
They must therefore remain vigilant in order to ensure the health and safety of the children using their toys, with due account being taken of the various uses to which those toys may be put.
(16) Za zagotavljanje varstva otrok pred nedavno odkritimi tveganji je treba sprejeti tudi nove osnovne varnostne zahteve.
(16) In order to ensure protection of children against recently discovered risks, it is also necessary to adopt new essential safety requirements.
Zlasti je treba dopolniti in posodobiti določbe o kemičnih snoveh v igračah.
In particular, it is necessary to complete and update provisions on chemical substances in toys.
Te določbe bi morale navajati, da morajo biti igrače skladne s splošno zakonodajo o kemikalijah, zlasti Uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH), o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije ter spremembi Direktive 1999/45/ES ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1488/94 ter Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS in direktiv Komisije 91/155/EGS, 93/67/EGS, 93/105/ES in 2000/21/ES.
These provisions should specify that toys should comply with the general chemicals legislation, in particular Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC .
Vendar bi bilo treba te določbe prilagoditi tudi posebnim potrebam otrok, ki so ranljiva skupina potrošnikov.
These provisions should, however, also be adapted to the particular needs of children, who are a vulnerable group of consumers.