natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Da bosta navedena konvencija in z njo povezan protokol začela veljati za Bolgarijo in Romunijo, mora Svet sprejeti sklep, ki bo določil datum začetka veljavnosti konvencije in njenih protokolov, šele po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom
In order to make the above-mentioned Convention and its related protocol enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania, the Council should only adopt a decision determining the date on which the Convention and its protocols shall enter into force, after having consulted the European Parliament
V skladu s členom 3(3) in 3(4) Akta o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije iz leta 2005, UL 2005, L 157, str.
In accordance with Article 3(3) and (4) of the 2005 Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania (OJ L 157, 21.6.2005, p.
Pristop Bolgarije in Romunije h Konvenciji z dne 29. maja 2000 o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa „Civilno pravosodje“ za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“
on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2007-2013 the Specific Programme "Civil Justice" as part of the General Programme "Fundamental Rights and Justice"
PE 390.766v01-00
PE 390.766v02-00
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (8699/2/2007 – C6‑0179/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (8699/2/2007 – C6‑0179/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča o predlogu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0122 )
Not yet published in OJ. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0122 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2)(c) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 251(2)(c) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve za drugo obravnavo ( A6‑0262/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0262/2007 ),
(16 a) Na podlagi prerogativ Evropskega parlamenta, kot so opredeljene v členu 8 sklepa 1999/468/ES, mora Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu posredovati vse potrebne informacije v zvezi z vsemi fazami izvajanja sedanjega programa, še posebej kar zadeva prednostne naloge, ki jih namerava izvajati v zadevnem letu.
(16a) In the light of the prerogatives of the European Parliament as defined in Article 8 of Decision 1999/468/EC, all of the necessary information should be made available by the Commission to the European Parliament concerning each stage of the implementation of the Programme, particularly as regards the intended priorities thereof for the year in question.
Komisija se je zavezala
Should Parliament put forward any suggestions or recommendations, the Commission has undertaken
Z izjavo na plenarnem zasedanju dne… , da bo, kadar bo Parlament podal predloge ali priporočila, posredovala ustrezne odgovore in obveščala predstavnike držav članic, ki sodelujejo v odborih, ki jih predvideva ta direktiva.
By a declaration in the plenary session of ... to provide a reasoned response and to inform the representatives of the Member States meeting within the committees provided for by this Decision.
Parlament je sprejel svoje stališče v prvi obravnavi 14. decembra 2006.
On 14 December 2006, Parliament adopted its position at first reading.
Svet je v svojem skupnem stališču, ki nam ga je posredoval in ki je v skladu s sporazumom iz prve obravnave, predloge sprememb Parlamenta sprejel, vendar pa je zavrnil predlog, da bi Parlament lahko blokiral odločitve Komisije glede izvajanja, še posebej pri izbiri letnih prednostnih nalog.
In its common position forwarded to us and in accordance with the agreement at first reading, the Council accepted Parliament's amendments, but rejected those concerning the possibility of Parliament blocking Commission decisions on implementation, notably when annual priorities are chosen.
Nadalje je podpredsednik Frattini v zvezi z določitvijo prednostnih nalog letnega financiranja namesto pravice Parlamenta do veta predlagal bolj pregleden dialog.
Furthermore, Vice-President Frattini proposed a more transparent dialogue, as opposed to Parliament's right of veto, when identifying priorities for annual financing.
Ta zaveza je bila dana že v pismu z dne 31. maja 2007, kot je navedeno v obrazložitvi.
This commitment has already been made in the letter of 31 May 2007, see in the explanatory statement.
Poročevalka sicer ocenjuje, da to ne zadostuje, vendar pa meni, da bi se Parlament lahko odrekel svojemu predlogu spremembe iz decembra 2006, v katerem zahteva pravico do nadzora, in sprejel predlog Komisije, da bi tako lahko dosegli sporazum in kar se da hitro oblikovali finančne programe.
Your rapporteur does not deem this to be sufficient but, by way of compromise, and because these financial programmes must be put in place as quickly as possible, she considers that the Parliament could give up its previous December 2006 amendment requiring a right of scrutiny and accept the Commission's proposal .
Ker gre za institucionalno pogodbo, bi morala biti ta zaradi preglednosti omenjena v uvodni izjavi zakonodajnega predloga, da bi bili evropski državljani oziroma vsaj tisti, ki želijo uporabljati nove določbe, z njo seznanjeni.
Being an institutional undertaking it should, for transparency reasons, be mentioned in the recitals of the legislative proposal, so that European citizens, or at least all those who wish to take advantage of the new provisions, can be made aware of it.
Pojasnjevalni predlog spremembe vključuje bistveni del Frattinijevega predloga, finančni program (kakor tudi finančni progam o boju proti drogam, o katerem še ni bilo sprejeto skupno stališče) pa bo lahko, če ga bo Svet sprejel, začel čim prej veljati.
This declaratory amendment incorporates the essence of Mr Frattini's proposal and, if the Council accepts it, this financial programme (and the financial programme for the fight against drugs, on which we are still awaiting the common position) can come into force as early as possible.
Pismo, ki ga je podpredsednik Evropske komisije Franco Frattini 31. maja 2007 poslal predsedniku Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve Jeanu-Marie Cavadi in poročevalki odbora Inger Segelström
Letter of 31 May 2007 from Mr Franco Frattini, Vice-President of the European Commission, to Mr Jean-Marie Cavada and Mrs Inger Segelström, Chairman of and rapporteur for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Pišem vama v zvezi z novim finančnim instrumentom za področje pravice, svobode in varnosti za obdobje 2007-2013.
I am writing to you on the subject of the new financial instruments in the area of freedom, security and justice for the period 2007-2013.
V preteklem decembru je med Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo prišlo do dogovora o vseh naših predlogih.
In December 2006 agreement was reached between Parliament, the Council and the Commission on all our proposals.
Različni instrumenti, ki sestavljajo splošna programa "Solidarnost in upravljanje priseljeniških tokov" ter "Varnost in varstvo svoboščin", so bili že sprejeti ali pa se bo to zgodilo, ko bodo pravniki-lingvisti preverili besedila.
The various instruments which make up the general programmes 'Solidarity and management of migration flows' and 'Security and safeguarding liberties' were then adopted, or will shortly be adopted following legal-linguistic verification of the texts.
Enako velja za programa "Temeljne pravice in državljanstvo" ter "Kazensko pravo", ki sta sestavna dela splošnega programa "Temeljne pravice in pravo".
This is also the case for the programmes 'Fundamental rights and citizenship' and 'Criminal justice', which form part of the general programme 'Fundamental rights and justice'.
Obstajajo pa nasprotja med predlogi Komisije in Sveta na eni strani ter Parlamenta na drugi o posebnih programih "Civilno pravo" ter "Preprečevanje uživanja drog in informiranje javnosti", kar preprečuje sprejetje teh programov v drugi obravnavi.
However, there is still some disagreement between the Commission and the Council, on the one hand, and Parliament, on the other, concerning the specific programmes 'Civil justice' and 'Drugs prevention and information' which is preventing for the moment the adoption of these programmes at second reading.
Kot veste, so ta nasprotja povezana z izvedbenim postopkom komitologije.
As you know, that disagreement is linked to the comitology procedure applicable.
Vem, da so tako Parlament kot Svet in Komisija vedno priznavali in poudarjali pomen teh programov ter da pripisujejo velik pomen njihovemu izvajanju.
I know that Parliament, like the Council and the Commission, has always acknowledged and emphasised the significance of these programmes and attaches great importance to their implementation.
Sam sem že večkrat poudaril pomen teh finančnih programov.
I myself have repeatedly highlighted the importance of these financial programmes.
Nove zamude pri sprejemanju bi zagotovo škodile izvrševanju odhodkov, predvidenih za leto 2007 za področje civilnega prava in preprečevanja uživanja drog.
It is essential, therefore, that we should overcome this disagreement very quickly so that the two programmes in question can be implemented before the end of this year, since any further delay in their adoption would certainly jeopardise the disbursement of the expenditure earmarked for 2007 in the areas of civil justice and drugs prevention.
Komisija daje velik pomen novemu postopku komitologije, uvedenem leta 2006, ki daje več pristojnosti Parlamentu, ter pri vsakem zadevnem ukrepu uporabo postopka temeljito preuči.
The Commission attaches great importance to the new comitology procedure introduced in 2006, which confers additional rights on Parliament, and is considering very carefully whether it applies to each of the measures concerned.
Komisija, pa tudi Svet, menita, da pri programih "Civilno pravo" ter "Preprečevanje uživanja drog in informiranje javnosti" to ni možno.
Its view, one shared by the Council, moreover, is that it does not apply to the programmes 'Civil justice' and 'Drugs prevention and information'.
Vendar bi želel spomniti, da je Komisija že januarja predlagala sporazumno rešitev, da bi ugodila želji Parlamenta o tem, da je seznanjen z vsem.
I should like to point out, however, that as long ago as January the Commission put forward a compromise solution designed to take account of Parliament's wish to be kept fully informed.
V pismu z dne 25. januarja 2007 sem izjemoma predlagal, da Komisija sprejme politično obvezo, da izpolni pričakovanja Parlamenta in ga pravočasno seznani z letnimi delovnimi načrti.
In a letter of 25 January 2007 I thus proposed, on an exceptional basis, that the Commission should give a political undertaking to comply with Parliament's wishes by providing it, in good time, with full information about the annual work programmes.
Prav tako sem izrazil svojo pripravljenost ter pripravljenost mojih služb, da na to temo odgovorimo na vprašanja Odbora LIBE, če bi menil, da je to potrebno.
I also indicated my willingness, and that of my staff, to attend a meeting of the LIBE committee and answer its questions on that subject, if the committee so wished.
Ta obveza Komisije bi okrepila "pravico do nadzora" Parlamenta, določeno s sklepom iz leta 1999 o komitologiji, ter mu omogočila, da je v celoti seznanjen z vsemi fazami postopka sprejemanja letnih programov.
This undertaking on the part of the Commission would consolidate Parliament's 'right of scrutiny', as enshrined in the 1999 comitology decision, by ensuring that it is fully informed of developments at all stages in the procedure for the adoption of the annual programmes.
Na sestanku, sklicanem na povabilo gospe Segelström v začetku februarja 2007, ki so se ga udeležile moje službe in nemško predsedstvo, je Parlament pokazal načelno naklonjenost predlogom.
At a meeting held at Mrs Segelström's invitation in early February 2007, attended by my staff and representatives of the German Presidency, Parliament welcomed the proposals in principle.
Na tem sestanku je Komisija potrdila pripravljenost, da svojo obvezo do Parlamenta uradno potrdi z izjavo, ki naj bo priložena besedilu programa.
At that meeting, the Commission confirmed its willingness to formally set out its undertaking vis-à-vis Parliament in a declaration annexed to the programme.
Na žalost pa na tem področju kasneje ni prišlo do nobenega napredka.
Unfortunately no further progress has been possible since then.
Medtem se Svet pripravlja, da bo sprejel skupno stališče o obeh programih na podlagi političnega sporazuma z dne 20. aprila 2007.
In the meantime, the Council is preparing to adopt common positions on the two programmes, following the political agreement reached on 20 April 2007.
Kot veste, nameravata ta programa sofinancirati projekte, ki jih vodijo predvsem nevladne organizacije, ter izvajati dejavnosti splošnega interesa na zadevnih področjih.
As you know, the purpose of these programmes is to co-finance projects carried out chiefly by NGOs and to implement measures of public interest in the areas concerned.
Poleg izvedbe posebnih projektov na evropski ravni ali v podporo delovanju nevladnih organizacij je treba zagotoviti financiranje dejavnosti, ki so del akcijskega načrta za boj proti drogam (2005-2008), omogočiti nadaljevanje dejavnosti evropske pravosodne mreže, ali subvencionirati združenja, ki jih je predlagal sam Parlament.
For example, in addition to implementing specific projects with a European dimension or supporting the work of NGOs, the aim is to fund measures covered by the Drugs Action Plan (2005-2008), to enable the European judicial network to continue its activities or to subsidise associations whose names have been put forward by Parliament itself.
Koristniki teh dejavnosti ne bi razumeli, zakaj je bilo sprejetje teh programov ponovno preloženo.
The beneficiaries of these actions would not understand the reasons for any further delay in adopting the programmes.
Poleg tega bi nova zamuda pri sprejetju programov lahko škodila uresničevanju dejavnosti, kot je pravna primerjalna študija o občutljivi temi mednarodnih posvojitev ali priprava referenčnega okvira za evropsko pogodbeno pravo.
In addition, a further delay in adopting the programmes might jeopardise measures such as the comparative law study of the sensitive topic of international adoption or the preparation of a reference framework in the area of European contract law.
Na področju preprečevanja uživanja drog bi prav tako bil postavljen pod vprašaj dialog s civilno družbo prek oblikovanja in financiranja novega foruma.
In the specific area of drugs prevention, dialogue with civil society, through the establishment and funding of a forum, would also be called into question.
Ob upoštevanju obvez Komisije in potrebe, da se nemudoma začne z izvajanjem novih finančnih programov, vas pozivam, da ponovno preučite naše predloge, da bi tako lahko prišlo do hitrega sprejetja programov.
In the light of the undertaking given by the Commission and the need to implement the new financial programmes without delay, I would ask you to reconsider our proposals so that the programmes can be adopted promptly.
(zaključne besede in podpis)
(Closing formula and signature)
Posebni program “Civilno pravo” (2007-2013)
Specific programme: Civil justice (2007-2013)
o mednarodnem zdravstvenem pravilniku
on International Health Regulations
– ob upoštevanju člena 3 Pogodbe o ES, v katerem je predvidena vzpostavitev skupnega trga z odpravo ovir pri prostem pretoku oseb,
– having regard to Article 3 of the EC Treaty, which provides for the creation of a Single Market through the removal of barriers to the free movement of persons,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. marca 2007 o ukrepih Skupnosti za zagotavljanje čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva
– having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2007 on Community action on the provision of cross-border healthcare
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2007)0073 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2007)0073 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila generalne skupščine Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije (WHA 58.) o mednarodnih zdravstvenih predpisih in resolucije generalne skupščine Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije z dne 26. maja 2006, ki poziva k prostovoljni predčasni uporabi nekaterih vidikov mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika v zvezi s pandemijo influence (WHA 59.2),
– having regard to the Report of the World Health Assembly (WHA 58.) on the International Health Regulations (IHR) and the WHA Resolution of 26 May 2006 calling for voluntary early application of certain IHR aspects relating to pandemic influenza (WHA 59.2),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 851/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o ustanovitvi Evropskega centra za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 establishing a European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
1. , Odločbe št 2119/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. septembra 1998 o vzpostavitvi mreže epidemiološkega spremljanja in obvladovanja nalezljivih bolezni v Skupnosti
1. , Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 1998 setting up a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the EU
UL L 268, 3.10.1998, str.
OJ L 268, 3.10.1998, p.
1. in Odločbe Komisije 2000/57/ES z dne 22. decembra 1999 o sistemu zgodnjega obveščanja in odzivanja pri preprečevanju in obvladovanju nalezljivih bolezni v skladu z Odločbo 2119/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
1. and Commission Decision 2000/57/EC of 22 December 1999 on the early warning and response system for the prevention and control of communicable diseases under Decision 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
UL L 21, 26.1.2000, str.
OJ L 21, 26.1.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0263/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0263/2007 ),
A. ker so se v bližnji preteklosti na področju nacionalnega in mednarodnega javnega zdravja pojavili novi bolezenski izzivi in ker bi bilo treba razviti boljše postopke za pomoč in informiranje na nacionalni in regionalni ravni; ker se je proti širjenju bolezni treba boriti na evropski ravni,
A. whereas the recent past has seen the emergence of new disease challenges for national and international public health and whereas better procedures for assistance and information should be developed at national and regional level; whereas it is necessary to deal with the spread of diseases at an European level,
B. ker v izjemno mobilnem in vse bolj globaliziranem svetu narašča potreba po javnem zdravstvenem varstvu na vseevropski in mednarodni ravni,
B. whereas in a highly mobile and globalising world the need for public health protection with an all-European and international dimension is growing,
C. ker bi bilo treba dati prednost zagotavljanju največje možne zaščite pred širjenjem nalezljivih bolezni po svetu in ob izrednih razmerah mednarodnih razsežnosti na področju javnega zdravja, pri tem pa čim manj posegati v svetovno trgovino,
C. whereas priority should be given to ensuring maximum protection against the global spread of infectious disease and public health emergencies of international concern, but with minimum interference with world traffic,
D. ker je treba v skladu s členom 5 pogodbe o ES spoštovati načelo subsidiarnosti, saj so za organizacijo zdravstvenih storitev pristojne posamezne države članice,
D. whereas, in accordance with Article 5 of the EC Treaty , the subsidiarity principle needs to be respected as the organisation of health services falls within the competences of individual Member States,
5. poudarja, da je nujno čim prej začeti z izvajanjem mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, hkrati pa okrepiti obstoječe sisteme in zmogljivosti;
Stresses the urgent need to implement the International Health Regulations as soon as possible, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle, while simultaneously strengthening existing systems and capacities;
10. je prepričan, da je treba za doseganje visoke ravni zaščite in pripravljenosti v vse bolj globaliziranem in izjemno mobilnem svetu nujno pomagati sosednjim in tretjim državam ter z njimi sodelovati;
Is convinced that in order to achieve a high level of protection and preparedness in a globalising and highly mobile world, it is absolutely necessary to support and cooperate with neighbouring and third countries;
16. poziva Komisijo, naj poišče načine in sredstva, da s financiranjem in regionalnimi razvojnimi mehanizmi podpre vzpostavitev ustreznih sistemov v sosednjih in tretjih državah;
Invites the Commission to find ways and means of supporting the establishment of adequate systems in neighbouring and third countries through financing and regional development mechanisms;
V tem samoiniciativnem poročilu so izražena mnenja o izvajanju mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika, ki ga je generalna skupščina Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije leta 2005 pregledala.
This own-initiative report sets out the views on the implementation of the International Health Regulations - the IHR, which have been revised in 2005 by the World Health Assembly.
Mednarodni zdravstveni pravilnik je mednarodni pravni instrument, namenjen preprečevanju širjenja bolezni, zaščiti pred njimi in njihovemu nadzoru ter zagotavljanju odziva, sorazmernega s tveganji na področju javnega zdravja.
The IHR is an international legal instrument which aims to prevent, protect against and control the spread of disease, and to provide a public health response proportionate to the risks.
Da bi bil pravilnik praktično uporaben, bo potrebna natančna uskladitev med Komisijo in državami članicami.
Making the IHR work in practice will require close co-ordination between the Commission and Member States.
Evropska unija in države članice lahko s sodelovanjem izboljšajo njegovo izvajanje in okrepijo zaščito državljanov EU v izrednih razmerah mednarodnih razsežnosti na področju javnega zdravja.
By working together, the European Union and Member States can optimise implementation, and enhance the protection of EU citizens from public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs).
Pri izvajanju mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika imata ključno vlogo zlasti Evropski center za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni in sistem EU za zgodnje obveščanje in odzivanje na nevarnosti za javno zdravje.
In particular the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and the EU Early Warning and Response System for public health threats (EWRS) play a key role in the implementation of the IHR.
Skratka, v samoiniciativnem poročilu so izpostavljena naslednja vprašanja:
In brief, this own-initiative report highlights on the following issues:
– usklajenost pri izvajanju mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika v Skupnosti na osnovi načela subsidiarnosti,
- the implementation of the International Health Regulations in a coordinated manner across the Community on the basis of the subsidiarity principle;
– opredelitev vloge Evropskega centra za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni in sistema EU za zgodnje obveščanje in odzivanje na grožnje javnemu zdravju,
- the clarification of the role of the ECDC and the EWRS;
– preprečevanje omejitev v mednarodnem prometu in prostem pretoku oseb pri izvajanju mednarodnega zdravstvenega pravilnika,
- the avoidance of restrictions on international traffic and on the free movement of persons while implementing the IHR;
– potreba po tesnejšem sodelovanju med nacionalnimi ter nacionalnimi in evropskimi organi,
- the necessity for close cooperation between national as well as between national and European authorities;