natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
O besedilu teh predpisov nemudoma obvestijo Komisijo , razen tega pa zagotovijo tabelo ujemanja omenjenih predpisov in te direktiv e.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof and shall, in addition, supply a table showing the correlation between those provisions and this Directive .
1 UL: Vstaviti datum 24 mesecev po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
* OJ: 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
* Vstaviti datum 18 mesecev po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
* 18 months of the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Ozadje in namen predloga
Background to, and aim of, the proposal
Že prejšnje direktive, zlasti direktiva 2001/105/ES (ena izmed treh iz zakonodajnega paketa Erika I) so opozorile na nujno potrebo po preoblikovanju sedanjega sistema odobritve klasifikacijskih zavodov s strani Skupnosti, vzpostavljenega z direktivo 94/57/, ki je sicer prispeval k precejšnjemu napredku na tem področju.
Previous directives, particularly Directive 2001/105/EC, one of the three proposals in the Erika I legislative package, have already been predicated on the imperative need to reform the present system for Community recognition of classification societies, established by Directive 94/57/EC; the substantial progress that they brought about was later cemented in the Council’s conclusions of 13 D ecember 2002 and in Parliament’s resolutions on strengthening safety at sea ( 2003/2235(INI) ) and the resolution adopted in the wake of the Prestige accident ( 2003/2066(INI) ).
Da je bil napredek opazen, sta priznala tudi Svet in Evropski parlament, prvi v zaključkih s srečanja 13. decembra 2002 in drugi v resoluciji o izboljšanju varnosti na morju ( 2003/2235(INI) in resoluciji, sprejeti po nesreči tankerja Prestige ( 2003/2066(INI) ).
It is necessary to return to this matter because more needs to be done in order to further consolidate and improve the operation of recognised organisations : to quote the various operators making up the shipping industry, if t hese organisations did not exist, they would have had to be invented, as they perform a vital task in m aintaining safety at sea.
K vprašanju se je treba vrniti zato, ker je pomembno, da se ponovno in še dodatno okrepijo dejavnosti teh organov, ki bi jih bilo treba po zagotovilih različnih dejavnikov pomorskega sektorja izumiti, če že ne bi obstajali, tako zelo pomembno vlogo igrajo pri ohranjanju varnosti na morju.
However, as mentioned above, the process of inspecting and certifying recognised organisations is still seriously flawed , posing a threat of unacceptable magnitude to safety and the environment.
A kot že rečeno, obstajajo pri postopku pregleda in potrjevanja priznanih organizacij precejšnje pomanjkljivosti, ki predstavljajo hudo in nesprejemljivo grožnjo za varnost in okolje.
Within the shipping safety system, a great deal of power is concentrated in the hands of the recognised organisations, and its exercise has to be closely supervised by the proper authorities.
Priznane organizacije imajo precejšnji vpliv na varnostno verigo v pomorskem prometu, ta vpliv pa mora biti predmet temeljitega nadzora pristojnih služb, ki morajo zagotoviti odločno in povsem neodvisno ravnanje organizacij, pristojnih za nadzor nad tem, ali ladje, ki plujejo po naših vodah, ustrezajo mednarodnim standardom s področja varnosti in preprečevanja onesnaževanja.
Recognised organisations are called upon to ensure that the ships sailing on our seas meet the appropriate international safety and pollution prevention standards; the authorities should guarantee that, when carrying out that duty, they act with independence and rigour.
Glede vprašanja izdaje dveh ločenih pravnih instrumentov, predloga uredbe in predloga direktive, namesto ene same direktive, ki je bila prvotno predlagana, se zdi pristop, na katerem temelji skupno stališče, smiseln.
On the question of producing two separate legal instruments, a proposal for a regulation and a proposal for a directive, instead of the single directive initially proposed, the approach underlying the common position appears to be sound.
Dejstvo, da nekatere točke v skupnem stališču odstopajo od različice, ki jo je sprejel Parlament, ne izključuje v celoti možnosti, da bi Parlament, Komisija in Svet dosegli soglasje.
The fact that some points in the common position depart from what was approved by Parliament does not conclusively rule out the possibility for Parliament, the Commission, and the Council to reach a consensus.
Nasprotno, skupnemu stališču smo naklonjeni, saj v glavnem upošteva mnenje Parlamenta na prvi obravnavi.
On the contrary, we take a favourable view of the common position, which is largely consistent with Parliament’s attitude at first reading.
Menimo, da vsekakor obstajajo trdni temelji za končni dogovor.
We believe in any event that there is a solid basis for a final understanding.
Naše stališče temelji na premisleku, da je treba skupino sedmih predlogov (dejansko gre za sedem plus ena, saj je bil predlog direktive o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav razdeljen na dva pravna instrumenta, in sicer na predlog direktive o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav, ter na predlog uredbe o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij), ki sestavljajo sveženj Erika III, nujno obravnavati kot povezano celoto in se ga ne sme deliti, saj bi tako nastala nevarnost neskladnosti.
The thinking behind our attitude is that the set of seven proposals (in reality, seven plus one, since the proposal for a directive on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations has been split into two legal instruments, namely a proposal for a directive on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations and a proposal for a regulation on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations), making up the ‘Erika III’ package must of necessity be treated as an interconnected whole and not be broken up, as there would otherwise be a risk of descending into incoherence.
To seveda ne spreminja dejstva, da je vsak predlog samostojna celota.
This of course does not alter the fact that each proposal is an entity in itself.
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi temeljnih načel za vodenje preiskav nesreč v sektorju pomorskega prometa in o spremembi direktiv 1999/35/ES in 2002/59/ES
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Directives 1999/35/EC and 2002/59/EC
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi temeljnih načel za vodenje preiskav nesreč v sektorju pomorskega prometa in o spremembi direktiv 1999/35/ES in 2002/59/ES
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Directives 1999/35/EC and 2002/59/EC
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (5721/5/2008 – C6‑0226/2008 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (5721/5/2008 – C6‑0226/2008 ),
546. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0590 ),
546. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0590 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0332/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0332/2008 ),
(9) Pri preiskovanju pomorskih nesreč in nezgod v zvezi z varnostjo bi morale države članice upoštevati "Smernice o pravičnem obravnavanju pomorščakov v primeru pomorskih nezgod", priložene Resoluciji skupščine IMO in izvršilnega odbora Mednarodne organizacije dela A.987(24) z dne 1. decembra 2005 ali druga priporočila oziroma instrumente mednarodnih organizacij, ki se nanašajo na človeški dejavnik, v kolikor se uporabljajo za tehnične preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo .
(9) While conducting safety investigations of marine casualties and incidents, Member States should take into account the Guidelines on fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident annexed to Resolution A.987(24) of the IMO Assembly and the Governing Body of the International Labour Organisation of 1 December 2005 , or any other recommendations or instruments relating to the human factor adopted by relevant international organisations, as far as they are applicable to technical safety investigations.
(9) Pri preiskovanju pomorskih nesreč in nezgod v zvezi z varnostjo bi morale države članice upoštevati "Smernice o pravičnem obravnavanju pomorščakov v primeru pomorskih nezgod", priložene resoluciji LEG.3(91) pravnega odbora IMO in izvršilnega odbora Mednarodne organizacije z dne 27. aprila 2006.
(9) While conducting safety investigations of marine casualties and incidents, Member States should take into account the Guidelines on fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident annexed to Resolution LEG.3(91) of the IMO Legal Committee and the Governing Body of the International Labour Organisation of 27 April 2006 .
S črtanjem se besedilo uskladi s stališčem Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave (glej predlog spremembe 3 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta).
The deletion brings the text in line with Parliament's position in first reading (see amendment 3 adopted in first reading).
(12) Nepristransko preiskovanje nesreč in nezgod v zvezi z varnostjo, ki vključujejo morska plovila ali druga plovila v pristanišču ali drugih omejenih pomorskih območjih, je ključno za učinkovito opredelitev okoliščin in vzrokov za takšno nesrečo ali nezgodo.
(12) Conducting a safety investigation of casualties and incidents involving seagoing vessels, or other vessels in port or other restricted maritime areas, in an unbiased manner is of paramount importance for effectively establishing the circumstances and causes of such casualty or incident.
Takšno preiskavo bi zato morali opraviti usposobljeni preiskovalci pod nadzorom neodvisnega telesa ali subjekta, da bi se preprečilo morebitno navzkrižje interesov.
Such an investigation should therefore be carried out by qualified investigators under the control of an independent body or entity in order to avoid any conflict of interest.
Takšno preiskavo bi zato morali opraviti usposobljeni preiskovalci pod nadzorom neodvisnega telesa ali subjekta, ki bi imel trajna pooblastila za sprejemanje odločitev, da bi se preprečilo morebitno navzkrižje interesov.
Such an investigation should therefore be carried out by qualified investigators under the control of an independent body or entity endowed with permanent decision-making powers, in order to avoid any conflict of interest.
S predlogom spremembe se besedilo uskladi s stališčem Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave (glej predlog spremembe 26 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta).
This amendment brings the text in line with Parliament's position in first reading (see amendment 26 adopted in first reading).
(18a) Nujno je preiskati ali preučiti na kakšen drug način klice v sili, ki prihajajo z ladje, in informacije iz katerega koli vira, da je ladja ali osebe na takšni ladji oziroma z nje v nevarnosti ali da zaradi dogodka, povezanega z delovanjem ladje, obstaja resno potencialno tveganje poškodbe oseb, ladijske konstrukcije ali okolja.
(18 a) Distress alerts from a ship or information from any source that a ship is, or persons on or from a ship are imperilled or that, as a result of an event in connection with the operation of a ship, there is a serious potential risk of damage to the persons, to the ship’s structure or the environment should be investigated or otherwise examined .
Klici v sili morajo biti vključeni v področje uporabe direktive, kot je prvotno predlagala Komisija.
Distress alerts should remain within the scope of the Directive as originally proposed by the Commission.
(20a) Pri razvoju ali spreminjanju skupne metodologije za preiskovanje pomorskih nesreč je treba upoštevati vse zaključke iz analiz obstoječih poročil o preiskovanju nesreč, ki bi lahko služili za preprečevanje nesreč v prihodnosti in za povečanje pomorske varnosti v Evropski uniji.
( 20a) Any conclusions drawn from the analyses of existing accident investigation reports which may be of use in the prevention of future disasters and the improvement of maritime safety in the E uropean U nion , should be taken into account in the development or modification of a common methodology for investigating marine accidents .
S predlogom spremembe se besedilo uskladi s stališčem Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave (glej predlog spremembe 2 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta).
This amendment brings the text in line with Parliament's position in first reading (see amendment 2 adopted in first reading).
(21) Države članice bi morale ustrezno upoštevati varnostna priporočila, ki izhajajo iz preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo.
(21) The safety recommendations resulting from a safety investigation should be duly taken into account by the Member States.
(21) Države članice in Skupnost bi morale ustrezno upoštevati varnostna priporočila, ki izhajajo iz preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo.
(21) The safety recommendations resulting from a safety investigation should be duly taken into account by the Member States and the Community .
S predlogom spremembe se vrne k stališču Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave (glej predlog spremembe 4 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta).
This amendment restores Parliament's position in first reading (see amendment 4 adopted in first reading).
( 26) V skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje se države članice spodbuja, da za svoje potrebe in v interesu Skupnosti izdelajo in objavijo lastne tabele, ki naj kolikor nazorno je to mogoče prikažejo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos v nacionalno pravo –
(26) In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Community, their own tables illustrating, as far as possible, the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public ,
Kot je prvotno predlagala Komisija, bi morale biti države članice dolžne pripraviti korelacijske tabele, v katerih natančno prikažejo, s katerimi določbami so posamezne zahteve iz direktive prenesene v nacionalno zakonodajo.
As originally proposed by the Commission, there should be an obligation for Member Sates to draw up correspondence tables, which indicate exactly by which provisions each of the requirements laid down in the Directive are transposed into national legislation.
Tabele so potrebne, saj na tej osnovi Komisija lahko natančno preveri, če so države članice direktivo pravilno prenesle in jo tudi pravilno izvajajo.
These tables are necessary to enable the Commission to verify thoroughly whether the Directive is correctly transposed and implemented by the Member States.
Člen 2 – odstavek 1 – uvodni del
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Ta direktiva se uporablja za pomorske nesreče in nezgode:
This Directive shall apply to marine casualties and incidents that:
Ta direktiva se uporablja za pomorske nesreče, nezgode in klice v sili :
This Directive shall apply to marine casualties, incidents and distress alerts that:
Člen 2 – odstavek 2 – uvodni del
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja za pomorske nesreče in nezgode, v katere so vključene samo:
This Directive shall not apply to marine casualties and incidents involving only:
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja za pomorske nesreče, nezgode in klice v sili , v katere so vključene samo:
This Directive shall not apply to marine casualties, incidents and distress alerts involving only:
( 2a) Izraza „resna nesreča“ in „manj resna nesreča“ se razumeta v skladu s posodobljenimi opredelitvami iz okrožnice 953 Odbora IMO za pomorsko varnost.
( 2a ) The terms “serious casualty” and “less serious casualty” shall be understood in accordance with the updated definitions contained in Circular 953 of the IMO Maritime Safety Committee .
Treba je ohraniti opredelitve, kot jih je predlagala Komisija, saj so te uporabljene v direktivi.
It is necessary to keep the definitions as proposed by the Commission since these terms are used in the Directive.
(4a) „Klic v sili“ pomeni signal, ki ga odda ladja, ali informacijo iz katerega koli vira, ki navaja, da je določena ladja oziroma da so ljudje na ladji ali z nje v nevarnosti na morju;
( 4a ) ‘Distress alert’ means a signal given from a ship, or information from any source, indicating that a ship is, or that persons on or from a ship are, in distress at sea.
5) "Varnostno priporočilo" pomeni vsak predlog, ki ga da eden od naslednjih subjektov:
5) "Safety recommendation" means any proposal made by either of the following:
5) „Varnostno priporočilo“ pomeni vsak predlog , vključno za namene registracije in nadzora, ki ga da eden od naslednjih subjektov:
5) ‘Safety recommendation’ means any proposal made , including for the purposes of registration and control, by either of the following:
(a) preiskovalno telo države, ki opravlja ali vodi preiskavo v zvezi z varnostjo, na podlagi podatkov, pridobljenih iz te preiskave; ali, kadar je to primerno,
(a) the investigative body of the State conducting, or leading, the safety investigation on the basis of information derived from that investigation; or, where appropriate,
(a) preiskovalno telo države, ki opravlja ali vodi preiskavo v zvezi z varnostjo, na podlagi podatkov, pridobljenih iz te preiskave; ali, kadar je to primerno,
(a) the investigative body of the State conducting, or leading , the safety investigation on the basis of information derived from that investigation; or, where appropriate;
(b) Komisija, ki deluje s pomočjo agencije in na podlagi izvlečkov analiz podatkov ter rezultatov opravljenih preiskav .
(b) the Commission, acting with the assistance of the Agency and on the basis of an abstract data analysis and the results of the investigations carried out .
S predlogom spremembe se vrne k stališču Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave (glej predlog spremembe 7 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta).
This amendment restores Parliament's position in first reading (see amendment 7 adopted in first reading)
(a) so te neodvisne od preiskav kaznivih dejanj ali drugih vzporednih preiskav, ki ugotavljajo odgovornost ali delitev krivde; in
(a) independent of criminal or other parallel investigations held to determine liability or apportion blame; and
(a) so te neodvisne od preiskav kaznivih dejanj ali drugih vzporednih preiskav, ki ugotavljajo odgovornost ali delitev krivde ter omogočajo, da se zaključki ali priporočila, ki izhajajo iz preiskav, začetih po tej direktivi, uporabijo v sodnih preiskavah ; in
(a) independent of criminal or other parallel investigations held to determine liability or apportion blame, allowing only the conclusions or recommendations resulting from investigations initiated under this Directive to be used in judicial investigations ; and
S predlogom spremembe se besedilo uskladi s stališčem Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave (glej predlog spremembe 8 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta).
This amendment brings the text in line with Parliament's position in first reading (see amendment 8 adopted in first reading).
Vsaka država članica zagotovi, da preiskavo v zvezi z varnostjo izvede preiskovalno telo iz člena 8 po zelo resni pomorski nesreči:
Each Member State shall ensure that a safety investigation is carried out by the investigative body referred to in Article 8 after very serious marine casualties:
Vsaka država članica zagotovi, da preiskavo v zvezi z varnostjo izvede preiskovalno telo iz člena 8 po resni ali zelo resni pomorski nesreči:
Each Member State shall ensure that a safety investigation is carried out by the investigative body referred to in Article 8 after serious or very serious marine casualties:
Preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo bi moralo biti nujne v primeru resnih nesreč, kot predlaga Komisija.
Safety investigations should be mandatory in the event of serious accidents as proposed by the Commission.
Poleg tega preiskovalno telo odloča tudi o tem, ali se izvede preiskava v zvezi z varnostjo katere koli druge pomorske nesreče ali nezgode .
In addition, the investigative body shall decide whether or not a safety investigation of any other marine casualty or incident shall be undertaken.
Poleg preiskovanja resnih in zelo resnih nesreč preiskovalno telo iz člena 8 po ugotovitvi osnovnih dejstev primera odloča tudi o tem, ali se izvede preiskava v zvezi z varnostjo pri manj resnih nesrečah, pomorskih nezgodah ali klicih v sili .
In addition to investigating serious and very serious casualties, the investigative body referred to in Article 8 shall, having established the initial facts of the case, decide whether or not a safety investigation of a less serious casualty , marine incident or a distress alert shall be undertaken.
Pri svoji odločitvi preiskovalno telo upošteva resnost nesreče ali nezgode, vrsto zadevnega plovila in/ali tovora, ter možnosti za ugotovitve preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo, na podlagi katerih bi lahko preprečili prihodnje nesreče in nezgode .
In its decision, the investigative body shall take into account the seriousness of the casualty or incident, the type of vessel and/or cargo involved, and the potential for the findings of the safety investigation to lead to the prevention of future casualties and incidents.
Pri svoji odločitvi preiskovalno telo upošteva resnost nesreče ali nezgode, vrsto plovila in/ali tovora, ki ga klic v sili zadeva, in/ali kakršno koli prošnjo organov, pristojnih za iskanje in reševanje .
In its decision, the investigative body shall take into account the seriousness of the casualty or incident, the type of vessel and/or cargo involved in the distress alert , and /or any request from the search and rescue authorities.
Kot predvideva predlog Komisije, bi morale biti preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo obvezne v primeru resnih nesreč, medtem ko bi bilo treba manj resne nesreče, pomorske nezgode in klice v sili preučiti in se odločiti, ali bi bilo smiselno začeti preiskavo.
As foreseen by the Commission proposal, safety investigations should be mandatory in the event of serious accidents, whereas less serious casualties, marine incidents and distress alerts should be examined in order to determine whether or not it would be useful to proceed to the investigation stage.
Preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo sledijo načelom skupne metodologije za preiskovanje pomorskih nesreč in nezgod, razvitim v skladu s členom 2(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 1406/2002.
Safety investigations shall follow the principles of the common methodology for investigating marine casualties and incidents developed pursuant to Article 2(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002.
Komisija prilagodi ali spremeni to metodologijo za namene te direktive.
The Commission shall adopt or modify this methodology for the purposes of this Directive.
Ta ukrep, namenjen spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive, med drugim z njenim dopolnjevanjem, se sprejme v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 18(3).
That measure, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, inter alia by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(3).
Preiskave v zvezi z varnostjo sledijo skupni metodologiji za preiskovanje pomorskih nesreč in nezgod, razviti v skladu s členom 2(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 1406/2002.
Safety investigations shall follow the common methodology for investigating marine casualties and incidents developed pursuant to Article 2(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002.