natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Po potrebi se lahko ta zahteva izpolni v skladu s postopkom iz člena 10 Konvencije z dne 29. maja 2000 o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije 1 .
If appropriate, this requirement may be met according to the procedure provided for in Article 10 of the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union .
1 UL C 197, 12.7.
1 OJ C 197, 12.7.
Pred odločitvijo o izreku kazni v primeru pogojne odložitve izreka kazni ali o preklicu pogojne kazni morajo obsojenca zaslišati pravosodni organi, da se zagotovi upoštevanje temeljnega načela zaslišanja obtožencev .
Before a decision is taken on sentencing in the case of a conditional sentence or on the revocation of the suspension of a sentence, the sentenced person must be heard by the judicial authorities in order to ensure that the fundamental principle that defendants must be heard is upheld .
(a) spremembo odložilnih ukrepov ali alternativnih sankcij ;
(a) modification of the suspensory measures or alternative sanction;
(a) spremembo odložilnih ukrepov ali obveznosti ali navodil, ki pomenijo alternativne sankcije ;
(a) modification of the suspensory measures or of the obligations or instructions which constitute alternative sanction;
(b) preklicem pogojne kazni;
(b) revocation of the suspension of sentence;
(b) preklicem pogojne kazni in pogojne odložitve izreka kazni ;
b) revocation of the suspension of sentence and of the conditional sentence ;
Člen 15, odstavek 4, točka (d)
Article 15, paragraph 4, point (d)
d) prenehanjem veljavnosti pogojne kazni, pogojne odložitve izreka kazni ali alternativne sankcije.
d) lapsing of the suspended sentence, conditional sentence or alternative sanction.
Pristojni pravosodni organ države izdaje sodbe mora pri kakršnih koli spremembah odložilnega ukrepa ali obveznosti ali navodil, ki pomenijo alternativne sankcije, ustrezno upoštevati člen 5.
Any modification of a suspensory measure or of the obligations or instructions which constitute alternative sanctions by the issuing State's competent judicial authority must be carried out with due regard to Article 5.
V primeru spremembe se lahko pristojni organ države izvršiteljice odloči, da sprejme novo odločitev v skladu s členom 7(2) ali členom 9(1)(i).
In the event of a modification, the executing State's competent authority may opt to take a fresh decision pursuant to Article 7(2) or Article 9(1)(i).
V primeru izreka kazni ali preklica pogojne kazni pristojni pravosodni organ države izdaje sodbe pristojnemu pravosodnemu organu države izvršiteljice hkrati sporoči, ali namerava državi izvršiteljici poslati:
In the event of the imposition of a sentence or the revocation of the suspension of a sentence, the competent judicial authority of the issuing State shall at the same time inform the competent judicial authority of the executing State whether it intends to forward to the executing State :
V primeru izreka kazni ali preklica pogojne kazni pristojni pravosodni organ države izdaje sodbe pristojnemu pravosodnemu organu države izvršiteljice hkrati sporoči, da nadzorstvo nad odložilnimi ukrepi ni več potrebno.
In the event of the imposition of a sentence or the revocation of the suspension of a sentence, the competent judicial authority of the issuing State shall at the same time inform the competent judicial authority of the executing State that there is no longer any need for suspensory measures to be supervised.
(a) sodbo in potrdilo, predvideno v Okvirnem sklepu 2007/.../PNZ, z namenom prevzema izvršitve ukrepa, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti; ali
(a) a judgment and certificate as provided for in Council Framework Decision 2007/…  /JHA* for the purpose of taking over responsibility for enforcement of the measure involving deprivation of liberty; or
*  UL: vstavi številko Okvirnega sklepa iz uvodne izjave 3.
*  OJ: please add number of Framework Decision referred to in Recital 3.
Člen 15, odstavek 5, točka (b)
Article 15, paragraph 5, point (b)
(b) evropski nalog za prijetje zaradi predaje obsojene osebe v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami 1 .
(b) a European arrest warrant for the purpose of surrender of the sentenced person in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States
1 UL L 190, 18.7.2002, str.
1 JO L 190 de 18.7.2002, p.
Če je obveznost izvrševanja odložilnih ukrepov ali alternativnih sankcij prenehala , pristojni organ države izvršiteljice ustavi odrejene ukrepe, takoj ko ga o tem ustrezno obvesti pristojni organ države izdaje sodbe .
If the obligation to execute suspensory measures or alternative sanctions has lapsed , the competent authority of the executing State shall end the measures ordered as soon as it has been duly notified by the competent authority of the issuing State .
Ko od pristojnega organa države izdaje sodbe prejme obvestilo v skladu z odstavkom 5 zgoraj , pristojni organ države izvršiteljice ustavi nadzorstvo nad odložilnimi ukrepi in njihovo izvršitev .
When it is notified of the fact by the competent authority of the issuing State pursuant to paragraph 5 above , the competent authority of the executing State shall end the supervision and execution of suspensory measures.
Amnestija in pomilostitev
Amnesty and pardon
Amnestija , pomilostitev in preskus sodbe
Amnesty , pardon and judgment review
Le država izdaje sodbe lahko sprejme odločitev o zahtevah za preskus sodb, ki vključujejo pogojne kazni, pogojne odložitve izreka kazni in alternativne sankcije, katerih nadzorstvo in izvršitev zajema ta okvirni sklep.
Only the issuing State can take a decision regarding requests for a review of judgments involving suspended sentences, conditional sentences and alternative sanctions, the supervision and execution of which are covered by this Framework Decision.
Če obsojena oseba zapusti državo izvršiteljico in pridobi zakonito običajno prebivališče v drugi državi članici , pristojni pravosodni organ države izvršiteljice pristojnost za nadzorstvo nad odložilnimi ukrepi in alternativnimi sankcijami ter za vse nadaljnje odločitve v zvezi z izvrševanjem sodbe prenese na pristojni pravosodni organ države izdaje sodbe.
If the sentenced person leaves the executing State and establishes his or her lawful and ordinary residence in another Member State , the competent judicial authority of the executing State shall transfer jurisdiction in respect of the supervision of the suspensory measures and alternative sanctions and in respect of all further decisions relating to the execution of the judgment to the competent judicial authority of the issuing State.
Če obsojena oseba zapusti državo izvršiteljico ali nima več zakonitega običajnega prebivališča v državi izvršiteljici , pristojni pravosodni organ države izvršiteljice pristojnost za nadzorstvo nad odložilnimi ukrepi in obveznostmi ali navodili, ki pomenijo alternativne sankcije, ter za vse nadaljnje odločitve v zvezi z izvrševanjem sodbe (ali odločbe o pogojnem odpustu, če je primerno) prenese na pristojni pravosodni organ države izdaje sodbe.
If the sentenced person leaves the executing State or ceases to have a lawful and ordinary residence in the executing State , the competent judicial authority of the executing State shall transfer jurisdiction in respect of the supervision of the suspensory measures and the obligations or instructions which constitute alternative sanctions and in respect of all further decisions relating to the execution of the judgment (or if appropriate the decision for conditional release) to the competent judicial authority of the issuing State.
Država izvršiteljica ni več pristojna za nadzorstvo nad obsojeno osebo, zato se pristojnost za nadzorstvo prenese na državo izdaje sodbe.
The executing State is no longer able to exercise supervision over the sentenced person, hence responsibility for supervision passes to the issuing State.
Takšen prenos pristojnosti je treba obravnavati kot „obveznost“ in ne kot „pooblastilo“.
Such a transfer of responsibility should be regarded as an 'obligation' and not as a 'power'.
Prenos pristojnosti iz odstavka 1 je obvezen tudi, kadar država izdaje sodbe pristojnemu pravosodnemu organu države izvršiteljice izda zahtevo v zvezi s tem, ker v državi izdaje sodbe potekajo nadaljnji kazenski postopki zoper to osebo.
The transfer of jurisdiction referred to in paragraph 1 must also take place if the issuing State issues a request to that effect to the competent judicial authority of the executing State on the grounds that further criminal proceedings against the person are taking place in the issuing State.
Evropska unija že dolgo ni več le skupno gospodarsko območje, ampak sprejema tudi skupne vrednote.
It is now quite some time since the European Union ceased to be merely a common economic area and began to adopt shared values as well.
Poskuša se približati cilju, da bi postala politična skupnost, ki si prizadeva za razsvetljenski ideal človekovega dostojanstva, ter postopoma vzpostavlja delitev politične moči med svojimi državami članicami, sodelovanje med institucijami in pravni sistem, ki je svetovljanski in usmerjen v ljudi.
It is progressing towards its aim of establishing a political community pursuing the illuminist ideal of the sublime dignity of man and it is gradually instituting political power-sharing amongst its Member States, cooperation amongst institutions and a legal system which is both cosmopolitan and people-centred.
Evropska unija je zares edinstvena, ker se približuje posamezniku in pravnemu sistemu, ki velja za vse narode in vse generacije.
What is genuinely fascinating about the European Union is this journey towards the individual and towards a legal system applicable to all peoples and all generations.
Evropska unija je edinstven primer politične organizacije, ki se je naučila, kako zbližati posamezne interese vsake države članice z moralnimi cilji razvijajočega se pravnega sistema.
The European Union is an extraordinary example of a political organisation which has learned to converge the particular interests of each Member State with the moral aims of an embryonic legal system.
Kazensko pravo je vključeno v postopno doseganje vzajemnega sodelovanja med državami članicami EU.
Criminal law is included in this gradual move towards mutual cooperation amongst the EU Member States.
Namen zadevnega okvirnega sklepa je olajšati ponovno vključitev obsojene osebe v družbo, izboljšati zaščito žrtev in celotne družbe ter olajšati izvršitev ustreznih pogojnih kazni, alternativnih sankcij in pogojnih odložitev izreka kazni v primeru storilcev, ki ne prebivajo v državi, v kateri so bili obsojeni .
The purpose of the Framework Decision under consideration here is to facilitate a sentenced person's reintegration into society, to provide better protection for victims and society as a whole and to facilitate the enforcement of appropriate suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences in the case of offenders who are not resident in the State in which they were sentenced.
Ta pobuda je pomembna zlasti, ker spodbuja pravosodne organe držav članic, da v kazensko pravo poleg kazni zapora vključijo tudi druge sankcije.
The value of this initiative is above all that it encourages the Member States' judicial authorities to incorporate sanctions other than custodial sentences into their criminal law.
Vsi se zavedamo, da sodniki neradi uporabljajo alternativne sankcije, če politični program ne zagotavlja pogojev za njihovo določitev.
We are all aware that if the political agenda does not offer conditions for the establishment of alternative sanctions, judges tend not to apply them.
Spodbujanje alternativnih sankcij krepi človekoljuben odnos do kazenskega prava in kazni ter zato na splošno spodbuja evropsko pravo.
Facilitating alternative sanctions serves to promote humanitarian attitudes to criminal law and to sentences and hence promotes European law in general.
Odpravlja zmotno nasprotje med pravico obsojene osebe do ponovne vključitve v družbo in interesom družbe, da se takšna oseba ponovno vključi v družbo.
It resolves the fallacy of setting a sentenced person's right to social reintegration against society's interest in reintegrating him.
Dejstvo je, da pri tem nasprotja ni.
The truth of the matter is that there is no opposition here.
Status obtoženih oseb je celo barometer, s katerim se lahko ocenita stopnja civiliziranosti in kakovost pravosodnega sistema v kateri koli politični skupnosti.
The status of sentenced persons is even a barometer enabling the degree of civilisation and the calibre of the justice system of any political community to be assessed.
Spodbujanje uporabe odložilnih ukrepov namesto kazni zapora je cilj, ki ga je treba nujno doseči v kazenskem pravu EU.
Promoting the application of suspensory measures as an alternative to a custodial sentence is an objective to be achieved as a matter of urgency in the field of EU criminal law.
Evropska politika si mora prizadevati za vzpostavitev povezave med kazenskim pravom in skrbjo za pravice v vsej svoji razsežnosti: v zvezi z določitvijo in izvršitvijo kazni ter razmerjem med obsojenimi osebami in družbo na splošno.
European politics must strive to establish a link between criminal law and a culture of rights in all its dimensions: as regards the devising and execution of sentences and the relationship between sentenced persons and society in general.
Učinkovitost vzajemnega priznavanja je včasih omejena, ker so sistemi kazenskega prava držav članic šele na začetni stopnji usklajevanja.
At times the effectiveness of mutual recognition is restricted by the fact that the Member States' criminal laws are still in the early stages of harmonisation.
Primer tega je zadevni okvirni sklep.
An example of this is provided by the Framework Decision under consideration.
Postopek sodelovanja pri nadzorstvu nad alternativnimi sankcijami in njihovem izvrševanju bi bil precej preprostejši in učinkovitejši (in tudi precej manj zapleten), če bi države članice sprejele enake vrste kazni ali imele podobne pravosodne strukture ali celo materialno in procesno kazensko pravo z večjo stopnjo enakosti [glej težavo v zvezi s prilagoditvijo „različnih ukrepov“ ali „nestabilnostjo pristojnosti“, kadar se prekliče pogojna kazen ali izreče kazen v primeru pogojne odložitve izreka kazni].
The procedure for cooperation in the supervision and execution of alternative sanctions would be much simpler and more efficient (and also much less problematic) if the Member States adopted the same types of sentence or had similar judicial structures or even substantive and procedural criminal laws with a greater degree of equivalence [see the problem of adapting the 'different measures' or of the 'instability of jurisdictions' when a suspended sentence is revoked or a sentence is imposed in the case of a conditional sentence].
Potreba po postopni uskladitvi materialnega kazenskega prava držav članic je osnovni pogoj za dokončno vzpostavitev evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
The need for the Member States' substantive criminal laws to be progressively harmonised is a background condition for the completion of the European area of freedom, security and justice.
Poleg tega se lahko večja usklajenost kazenskega prava držav članic utemelji na podlagi skupnih vrednot iz člena 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji: te vrednote namreč temeljijo predvsem na pravu, v skladu s katerim se kaznuje kaznivo ravnanje.
Furthermore, increasing harmonisation of the Member States' criminal laws can be advocated on the basis of the common values referred to in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union: after all, those values are to a large extent underpinned by laws which punish criminal behaviour.
Medtem bo treba procesna pravila v okvirnem sklepu organizirati glede na sedanje stanje.
In the meantime the procedural rules laid down in the Framework Decision will have to be organised on the basis of the current state of affairs.
Zato je določeno, da bo zaradi zakonitosti, jasnosti in pravne varnosti delitev pristojnosti in odgovornosti med državo izdaje sodbe in državo izvršiteljico urejena v skladu s pravilom, da bo država, ki izvršuje posamezno pristojnost ali odgovornost, pri tem uporabila svoje pravo ( glej člen 12(2) ).
Hence it has been decided that for reasons of legality, clarity and legal certainty, the distribution of powers and responsibilities between the issuing State and the executing State will be governed by the rule that the State which exercises a given power or responsibility will apply its own laws thereto ( see Article 12(2) ).
Poleg tega je načelo zaslišanja obtožencev postalo obvezno v primerih, ki vključujejo preklic pogojne kazni ali izrek kazni v primeru pogojne odložitve izreka kazni [ glej člen 14(2)a (novo) ].
Along with this arrangement a decision has been taken to stipulate the principle of the hearing of defendants as a principle which must be applied in cases involving the revocation of a suspended sentence or the imposition of a conditional sentence [ see Article 14(2)a (new) ].
Kot koristno je ocenjeno tudi sklicevanje na ustave držav članic v povezavi s sklicevanjem na vrednote iz Pogodbe ( glej člen 3 ).
Similarly, the reference to the Member States' constitutions in conjunction with a reference to the Treaty values ( see Article 3 ) has been deemed useful.
Temeljne pravice določajo standard, na podlagi katerega je treba sezname temeljnih pravic EU in držav članic razumeti kot odprte sezname, ki se med seboj dopolnjujejo.
Fundamental rights set a standard on the basis of which the inventories of EU and Member-State fundamental rights are to be read as open ones which complement each other.
V zvezi s tem je bil potreben tudi prispevek glede soglasja za začetek prenosa pristojnosti za nadzorstvo in izvršitev ( glej člen 5(1)a ).
In this connection a contribution to the question of consent in initiating the transfer of responsibility for supervision and execution has also been sought ( see Article 5(1)a ).
Možnost prenosa ni temeljna pravica obsojene osebe [prav zaradi njenega statusa obsojenca, pojasnitev časovne razporeditve in vloge pa je tudi vprašanje pravne legitimnosti].
The transfer option is not a sentenced person's fundamental right [precisely because that person already has 'sentenced' status and the clarification of timing and role is also a question of judicial legitimacy].
Zato prenos ni odvisen od soglasja.
Hence the transfer is not subject to consent.
Tu je treba določiti dokončno sodno presojo, ki je odvisna od namenov okvirnega sklepa in priznanja pravice do zaslišanja obsojeni osebi, ker ima zaslišanje pri taki presoji bistveno vlogo.
What should exist here is decisive judicial consideration geared to the purposes of the Framework Decision and the granting to the sentenced person of the right to be heard, since a hearing has an essential role to play in such consideration.
Poleg tega je treba zaradi predlagane učinkovitosti vključiti „pravilo o izjemni naravi zavrnitve“ s strani države izvršiteljice ( glej člen 12(3) ).
It is, furthermore, in the interests of such effectiveness that it is being proposed here that a 'rule on the exceptional nature of refusal' by the executing State be enshrined ( see Article 12(3) ).
Sprejeta je tudi odločitev, da se vključi opredelitev „zakonitega običajnega prebivališča“, ki ustreza opredelitvi iz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti [ glej člen 2(ga) (novo) ].
A decision has also been taken to include a definition of 'lawful and ordinary residence' which corresponds to the definition found in European Court of Justice case-law [ see Article 2(ga) (new) ].
Kot je navedeno, je v mnenju celovito pojasnjena opredelitev/delitev pristojnosti in odgovornosti med državo izdaje sodbe in državo izvršiteljico.
As has already been said, the opinion provides comprehensive clarification of the definition/distribution of powers and responsibilities between the issuing State and the executing State.
Na jasnosti temeljita pravna varnost in zakonitost, ki sta v kazenskem pravu bistveni.
Clarity underpins the legal certainty and the legality which are essential to criminal law.
Zato je možnost, da država izvršiteljica prilagodi naravo ukrepov ( glej člen 7(2) ), zavrnjena.
For this reason the adaptation of measures by the executing State as regards the nature thereof ( see Article 7(2 ) has been rejected.
S tipizacijo, ki je potrebna v skladu z načelom stroge zakonitosti v kazenskem pravu, je združljiva le prilagoditev trajanja in morda oblike izvršitve.
Only adaptation as regards duration and possibly the form of execution is compatible with the typification required by the principle of strict legality in criminal law.
Na koncu je treba poudariti, da francosko-nemška pobuda o tem okvirnem sklepu posreduje zelo pozitivno sporočilo na evropskem ozemlju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
Lastly, it should be pointed out that the Franco-German initiative relating to this Framework Decision sends out a very positive signal within the European area of freedom, security and justice.
Kaže na to, da se evropska razsežnost zdaj razume v luči ideje o intenzivnem političnem in pravnem povezovanju EU.
It shows that the European dimension is now understood in the light of the idea of intensive EU political and legal integration.
Kaže tudi na to, kako je humanizacija kazenskega prava vključena v evropski pravni sistem: pravni sistem, ki temelji na trdni vrednoti človečnosti, pri kateri je obstoj vsakega posameznika – tudi obsojenca – smiseln že sam na sebi ter se vsak posameznik obravnava kot edinstveno in neponovljivo bitje.
It also shows how the humanisation of criminal law infuses the European legal system: a legal system based on the irreducible value of humanity, in which each individual - even a sentenced one - is regarded as an end in himself, as a unique and unrepeatable being.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o postavitvi, delovanju in upravljanju komunikacijske infrastrukture za okolje schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS)
on the proposal for a Council decision on the installation, operation and management of a Communication Infrastructure for the Schengen Information System (SIS) environment
MNENJE Odbora za proračun
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................12
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2007)0306 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0306 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe o EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0215/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0215/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6–0357/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0357/2007 ),
2. meni, da mora biti okvirni referenčni finančni znesek, naveden v predlogu Komisije, usklajen z zgornjo mejo razdelka 3a novega večletnega finančnega okvira, in poudarja, da bo letni znesek določen v letnem proračunskem postopku v skladu z določbami točke 38 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006;
Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
Stroški za postavitev, delovanje in upravljanje komunikacijske infrastrukture gredo v breme splošnega proračuna Evropske unije.
The costs of installing, operating and managing the Communication Infrastructure shall be borne by the general budget of the European Union
Stroški za postavitev, delovanje in upravljanje komunikacijske infrastrukture gredo v breme splošnega proračuna Evropske unije.
The costs of installing, operating and managing the Communication Infrastructure shall be borne by the general budget of the European Union.
Vsaka država članica je odgovorna za stroške, nastale z nacionalno bazo podatkov in njeno povezavo s komunikacijsko infrastrukturo SIS ali S-Testa.
Each Member State shall be responsible for bearing the costs incurred by the national database and of its connection to the SIS or S-Testa communication infrastructure.