natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Računsko sodišče podpira Evropski parlament in Svet pri nadzoru nad izvrševanjem proračuna.
The Court of Auditors assists the European Parliament and the Council in monitoring the implementation of the budget.
Naloga Parlamenta je tudi, da na priporočilo Sveta podeli Komisiji razrešnico za izvrševanje proračuna.
Parliament also has the task, on a recommendation from the Council, of granting the Commission discharge for its implementation.
Pri tem se lahko Evropski parlament in Svet v vlogi organa za podelitev razrešnice opreta predvsem na vsakoletno izjavo Računskega sodišča o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov.
In doing so, the European Parliament and the Council in their role as the discharge authority can in particular rely on the annual Declaration of Assurance by the Court of Auditors regarding the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions.
Očitno je, da je v korist vseh vpletenih, če se na podlagi vseh skupnih interesov Parlamenta in Računskega sodišča ter v evropskem pravnem redu predpisanega tesnega sodelovanja obeh institucij poskusi uresničiti čim tesnejše sodelovanje in se, če je le mogoče, še izboljša.
In view of all these common interests of Parliament and the Court of Auditors and the close cooperation between them which is required by the European legal order, it is clear that, for all parties concerned, it is in their own interests to seek the closest possible cooperation and – if possible – to further improve it.
Globoko prepričan lahko zase rečem, da bom storil vse, kar je v moji moči, da bi trajno in učinkovito spodbujal in podpiral sodelovanje Evropskega računskega sodišča in Parlamenta.
As for me personally, I can say here, on the basis of my deepest convictions, that I shall do all that lies in my power to effectively and lastingly promote and support the joint work of the Court of Auditors and Parliament.
Evropsko računsko sodišče podpira proračunski organ pri nadzoru nad izvrševanjem proračuna.
The Court of Auditors assists the budgetary authority in monitoring the implementation of the budget.
V ta namen se poročila, ki jih pripravi Računsko sodišče (letno poročilo, izjava o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig in posebna poročila) posredujejo Parlamentu, kjer se o njih razpravlja predvsem v Odboru za proračunski nadzor.
To this end, the reports of the Court of Auditors (Annual Report, Declaration of Assurance and special reports) are forwarded to the European Parliament and considered there, in the first instance by the Committee on Budgetary Control.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da bodo poročila točna in zanesljiva, da bodo uspešno vzdržala argumente revidiranih služb, ter hkrati tako aktualna, da ne bodo vzbudila le zanimanja Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mu omogočila, da na podlagi predloženih poročil hitro sprejme zaključke, s katerimi bi preprečil nadaljnjo škodo ali uvedel hitre izboljšave, temveč bodo dala priložnost tudi javnosti, da hitro izrazi svoje mnenje.
As regards the drafting of the reports, it should be ensured that they are correct and reliable, so that they can be shown to hold water despite the arguments of the departments being audited, and at the same time they must be sufficiently up to date to be of interest not only to the Committee on Budgetary Control and to give it the opportunity to draw its conclusions quickly on the reports submitted in order to prevent further losses or to introduce improvements without delay but also to make it possible to inform the public as quickly as possible.
Menim, da se je treba prav tako obvezno zavzemati za revizijo upravljanja in smotrnosti poslovanja ter nadzirati izvajanje storitev.
It also seems to me urgent to accelerate the audit of administration and financial management and the performance audit.
Računsko sodišče mora temeljito preveriti pripombe, ki jih k predloženim poročilom Računskega sodišča poda Evropski parlament, ter tako zagotoviti, da se pripombe Parlamenta upoštevajo, pozneje pa je mogoče na njihovi podlagi sprožiti tudi nove revizije.
The remarks formulated by the European Parliament after the submission of the reports of the Court of Auditors must be thoroughly examined by the Court of Auditors in order to ensure that Parliament's decisions are complied with, and can then also lead to the performance of fresh audits.
V letnih delovnih programih (načrtovanje poročil) je treba biti sicer pozoren na uspešno sodelovanje s Parlamentom, a je treba vseeno ohraniti neodvisnost Računskega sodišča.
The annual work programmes (report planning) should be geared to fruitful cooperation with Parliament, while maintaining the Court’s independence.
Zelo pomembna naloga, ki jo ima Evropsko računsko sodišče, namreč da Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsako leto predloži izjavo o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov, je vezana na precejšnjo potrebo po kadrovskih virih, to pa zmanjšuje njegovo zmogljivost izvajanja revizij smotrnosti poslovanja in nadzora izvajanja storitev.
The annual submission by the Court of Auditors of the Declaration of Assurance to the European Parliament and the Council is a very important task requiring substantial use of human resources, which inhibits its capacity to perform financial management audits and performance audits.
Računsko sodišče si je spričo tega dejstva zastavilo strateški cilj, da bo zmanjšalo kadrovske vire za pripravo izjave o zanesljivosti ter se osredotočilo na področje revizij smotrnosti poslovanja in nadzora izvajanja storitev.
In the light of this fact, the Court has adopted the strategic objective of reducing the resources it deploys for the Declaration of Assurance in order to assign more of them to the sector of financial management audits and performance audits.
Verjamem, da bi bilo z okrepitvijo revizij smotrnosti poslovanja in nadzora izvajanja storitev mogoče precej izboljšati učinkovitost pri porabi sredstev EU.
I believe that stepping up financial management audits and performance audits would permit a good many increases in efficiency in the use of EU funds.
Več pozornosti bi bilo treba posvetiti smotrnosti porabe sredstev.
Greater attention should be devoted to the appropriate use of funds.
Obsežne revizije določenega območja, a tudi posamezne revizije porabe sredstev na mestu samem, bi lahko po zaslugi odkrivanja konkretnih pomanjkljivosti pri doseganju ciljev in na njih temelječih priporočil pomagale pri odpravljanju oziroma preprečevanju razvoja v napačno smer ter povečale učinkovitost porabe sredstev EU.
Both comprehensive audits of a sector and individual audits of the use of funds on the spot could reveal specific shortcomings in the attainment of targets, leading to recommendations based on them, thereby helping to halt or avoid undesirable developments and to use EU funds more efficiently.
Nadzor izvajanja storitev je zato izjemno pomemben ne le za zagotovitev temeljnih načel dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, pač pa tudi za vsakoletno zmanjšanje tveganja za napake na posameznih političnih področjih in za pospeševanje razvoja smiselnega izboljševanja porabe sredstev.
Performance audits are therefore extremely important in order not only to enforce the principles of sound financial management but also to bring about annual improvements in the risk of error in the individual fields of policy and to pursue worthwhile further improvements to the use of funds.
Nadzor izvajanja storitev je lahko notranji ali zunanji.
Performance audits can be performed both internally and externally.
Dodana vrednost zunanje revizije je v tem, da je zunanji organ neodvisen, rezultati pa niso namenjeni le temu organu, pač pa tudi Parlamentu, ki lahko na podlagi priporočil samostojno povleče zaključke.
The added value of an external audit lies in the fact that the external authority is independent and the findings are intended not only for the authority but for Parliament, which can itself independently draw conclusions from the recommendations.
V sami naravi zadeve je, da je mogoče ugotovitve, pridobljene v okviru nadzora izvajanja storitev, na različne načine uporabiti na področju upravljanja.
It goes without saying that the observations made during a performance audit can be taken into account in different ways in the field of administration.
Ena od možnosti je, da se v zaupanja polnem in pozitivnem ozračju med revizorji in revidiranimi subjekti revidirano službo prepriča o smiselnosti izvajanja ukrepov, ki jih predlagajo revizorji (neposredna uresničitev).
One possibility is that, in an atmosphere of confidence and positivity, the department undergoing the audit may be convinced of the desirability of implementing the measures proposed to it by the auditors (direct implementation).
Druga možnost pa je, da nadrejena institucija revidirane službe upošteva priporočila in zaključke Računskega sodišča in jih uveljavi na zadevnem področju.
Another possibility exists, namely that the institution to which the department undergoing the audit belongs may comply with the recommendations and conclusions of the Court of Auditors and act on them in its sector.
Tudi Evropski parlament ima na tem področju pomembno vlogo, saj se lahko, če se mu zdi zadeva posebej pomembna, odzove s sprejetjem sklepa.
In this field, however, the European Parliament is also of particular significance if – supposing that this seems to Parliament to be particularly important – it responds by taking decisions.
Trajno in redno preverjanje rezultatov in priporočil, ki jih je podalo Računsko sodišče, je odločilnega pomena tudi pri nadzoru izvajanja storitev.
But in the case of performance audits too it is essential to persistently and regularly check on the follow-up measures based on the findings and recommendations of the Court of Auditors.
Nacionalni revizijski organi redno preverjajo finančne transakcije, ki se opravljajo na podlagi deljene uporabe sredstev.
The national audit institutions regularly examine financial transactions based on shared use of funds.
Ta se dajo na razpolago organom Skupnosti.
Their findings are made available to the Community institutions.
Revizije Evropskega računskega sodišča se odvijajo v povezavi z revizijskimi organi posamezne države članice, pri čemer se ohrani neodvisnost obeh strani.
Audits by the Court of Auditors are performed in conjunction with the national audit institutions while each side retains its independence.
Pri tem je treba spodbujati nacionalne revizijske organe, naj spremljajo zahtevke Računskega sodišča za revizije v njihovi državi.
Here the national audit institutions should be encouraged to assist with the audit assignments of the Court of Auditors in their country.
Evropsko računsko sodišče in predsedniki nacionalnih revizijskih organov se vsako leto sestanejo v kontaktnem odboru ter krepijo sodelovanje.
The Court of Auditors and the Presidents of the national audit institutions meet annually in the Contact Committee to further develop their cooperation.
Pri tem se poraja zlasti vprašanje uskladitve revizijskih standardov v okviru EU.
Here the main problem which arises is that of harmonisation of audit standards in the EU.
Po drugi strani pa mora tudi Evropsko računsko sodišče še naprej upoštevati rezultate nacionalnih revizij.
Moreover, national audit findings should be taken into account by the Court of Auditors.
Prav tako si je treba prizadevati za to, da bodo revizijske službe še bolj pozorne na področja, ki so z vidika pravilnosti in kakovosti izvrševanja proračuna zanimiva za Parlament, zlasti za Odbor za proračunski nadzor.
In addition, it would be desirable to inform audit authorities more fully about the audit themes which interest Parliament and particularly the Committee on Budgetary Control with regard to the regularity and quality of budgetary management.
Računsko sodišče bi lahko prav na tem področju odlično uporabilo ugotovitve nacionalnih revizijskih organov.
The Court of Auditors could particularly put the findings of the national audit institutions to optimal use in this field.
Brez dvoma bodo vedno mogoče izboljšave v sodelovanju med nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi in Računskim sodiščem in nemara bi bilo v zvezi s tem pametno, da se sedanji kontaktni odbor sestane več kot enkrat letno, saj bi se bilo tako mogoče kar najhitreje pogovoriti in posvetovati o vseh težavah.
It is clear that scope will repeatedly arise for improving cooperation between the national audit institutions and the Court of Auditors and perhaps it would therefore be desirable to meet more than once a year in the Contact Committee which already exists in order to be able to discuss and reach conclusions on all the problems as soon as possible.
Da, saj je sodelovanje Računskega sodišča in Parlamenta ena najpomembnejših nalog člana Evropskega računskega sodišča in bi to trajno spodkopalo trdne temelje zaupanja med obema institucijama ter oviralo sodelovanje.
Yes, because cooperation between the Court and Parliament is one of the most important tasks of a Member of the Court of Auditors and this would cause lasting damage to the fruitful basis for trust between the two Institutions and would not be conducive to working together.
Zuzana Brzobohatá, Derk Jan Eppink, Christofer Fjellner, Monika Hohlmeier, Ivailo Kalfin (Ivajlo Kalfin), Marian-Jean Marinescu, Véronique Mathieu, Barbara Weiler
Zuzana Brzobohatá, Derk Jan Eppink, Christofer Fjellner, Monika Hohlmeier, Ivailo Kalfin, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Véronique Mathieu, Barbara Weiler
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012, oddelek I – Evropski parlament, oddelek II – Svet, oddelek IV – Sodišče, oddelek V – Računsko sodišče, oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, oddelek VII – Odbor regij, oddelek VIII – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, oddelek IX – Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov
on the guidelines for the 2012 budget procedure, Section I – European Parliament, Section II – Council, Section IV – Court of Justice, Section V – Court of Auditors, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII – Committee of the Regions, Section VIII – European Ombudsman, Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, Section X - European External Action Service
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2007/436/ES, Euratom z dne 7. junija 2007 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti
– having regard to Council Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom of 7 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities’ own resources
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2009 skupaj z odgovori revidiranih institucij
– having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2009, together with the audited institutions’ replies
– ob upoštevanju členov 23(7) in 79 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 23(7) and 79 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0049/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0049/2011 ),
A. ker trenutni finančni, gospodarski in socialni položaj EU zahteva, da se institucije odzovejo s potrebno kakovostjo in učinkovitostjo ter da uporabljajo stroge postopke upravljanja, da bi lahko ustvarili prihranke,
A. whereas the current financial, economic and social situation of the EU obliges the institutions to respond with the quality and efficiency that is required and to employ strict management procedures so that savings may be achieved,
B. ker bi bilo treba institucijam zagotoviti zadostna sredstva, čeprav je treba v trenutnem gospodarskem okviru ta sredstva upravljati strogo in učinkovito,
B. whereas the institutions should be provided with sufficient resources, although in the current economic context those resources should be managed with rigour and efficiency,
C. ker Evropski parlament v tej fazi letnega postopka pričakuje načrte prihodkov in odhodkov drugih institucij ter predloge svojega predsedstva za proračun za leto 2012,
C. whereas at this stage of the annual procedure, Parliament is awaiting the other institutions’ estimates and its own Bureau’s proposals for the 2012 budget,
D. ker je zlasti koristno, da Odbor za proračun in predsedstvo nadaljujeta okrepljeno sodelovanje med organoma že četrto leto, leta 2012, med celotnim proračunskim postopkom,
D. whereas it is particularly desirable for the Committee on Budgets and the Bureau to continue with the enhanced cooperation between the two bodies for the fourth year in 2012, throughout the budget procedure,
E. ker je predsedstvo v skladu s členom 23 poslovnika Parlamenta pristojno za sprejemanje finančnih, organizacijskih in upravnih odločitev v zvezi z notranjo organizacijo Parlamenta, Odbor za proračun pa je pristojen za določitev načrta proračunskih prihodkov in odhodkov Parlamenta v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka,
E. whereas, under Rule 23 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, the Bureau is responsible for taking financial, organisational and administrative decisions concerning the internal organisation of Parliament and the Committee on Budgets is responsible for establishing Parliament’s draft budget estimates in the context of the annual procedure,
F. ker bi se moral vpliv začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe na razdelek 5 stabilizirati v letu 2012, čeprav bo na primer ESZD imela učinek, ki ga je trenutno še težko količinsko opredeliti,
F. whereas the impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on heading 5 should stabilise in 2012, although, for instance, the EEAS will have an impact which is still difficult to quantify at this moment,
G. ker bo širitev s pridružitvijo Hrvaške, načrtovano v letu 2013, imela posledice za proračun za leto 2012, zlasti glede sredstev za nove poslance in zaposlovanja osebja,
G. whereas, with Croatia’s accession scheduled for 2013, enlargement will have an impact on the budget for 2012, particularly as regards resources for the new Members and staff recruitment,
H. ker se je v preteklih letih proračunski organ odločil, da sprejme preudaren pristop glede upravnih dohodkov in tako zagotovi znatne rezerve v okviru zgornje meje razdelka 5,
H. whereas in past years the budgetary authority has agreed to take a prudent approach on administrative expenditure, thus leaving significant margins under the heading 5 ceiling,
I. ker zgornja meja razdelka 5 večletnega finančnega okvira (VFO) za proračun EU za leto 2012 znaša 8.754 milijonov EUR (kar pomeni povečanje za 340 milijonov EUR ali 4 % v primerjavi z letom 2011, vključno z upoštevanjem dvoodstotne inflacije),
I. whereas the ceiling for heading 5 of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the EU’s budget in 2012 is EUR 8 754 million (representing an increase of EUR 340 million, or 4%, compared to 2011, including 2% for inflation),
J. ker je Parlament kot pristojni sozakonodajalec sklenil, da bo našel razumno ravnotežje med svojimi človeškimi viri in novimi pristojnostmi po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe (19,67 % skupne vsote razdelka 5 v letu 2009, 19,99 % v letu 2010 in 20,03 % v letu 2011),
J. whereas in its capacity as colegislator Parliament has decided to find a reasonable match between its human resources and its new competences following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty (19.67% of the heading 5 total in 2009, 19.99% in 2010 and 20.03% in 2011),
K. ker je bistveno, da se spremljajo gibanja pri porabi razdelka 5 v letu 2011, da bi oblikovali ustrezna predvidevanja za prihodnje proračune,
K. whereas it is essential to monitor movements in heading 5 spending throughout 2011, in order to develop an appropriate forecast for the forthcoming budgets,
L. ker je predsedstvo s sklepom 24. marca 2010 sprejelo srednjeročno nepremičninsko strategijo Parlamenta, ki določa nekatere ključne parametre za njegovo prihodnjo nepremičninsko politiko; ker je Parlament kot del te strategije sklenil, da bo še naprej dajal prednost nakupu stavb (kadar je razumno) in se pri tem osredotočil na svoje tri kraje dela; ker je zgodnje plačilo, z namenom zmanjšati stroške financiranja, še vedno ena od ključnih prednostnih nalog v prihodnosti,
L. whereas by decision of 24 March 2010 the Bureau adopted Parliament’s medium-term buildings strategy, which sets out some key parameters for its future property policy; whereas as part of that strategy Parliament has decided to continue to give priority to the purchase of buildings (where reasonable), focusing on geographical concentration in its three places of work; whereas early payment, with a view to reducing financing costs, remains one of the key priorities for the future,
Splošni okvir in prednostne naloge za proračun 2012
General f ramework and priorities for the 2012 budget
3. poudarja, da prizadevanje za konsolidacijo ne bi smelo preprečiti naložb (npr. v tehnologijo), ki bodo prinesle dolgoročne prihranke;
Points out that this consolidation effort should not prevent investments (e.g. in technology) which would result in future long-term savings;
5. meni, da bi morale institucije kot rezultat izvajanja teh načel predložiti načrte za zmanjšanje stroškov; s tem v zvezi meni, da bi bilo treba razmisliti o koristih centralizacije, da bi tako ustvarili ekonomije obsega (na primer centralizirana javna naročila, skupne službe institucij) ter o tem, kaj bi moralo ostati ali biti decentralizirano;
Believes that, as a result of implementation of these principles, institutions should submit cost cutting plans; takes the view, in this connection, that thought should be given to the advantages of centralisation, so as to generate economies of scale (e.g.: centralised procurement, shared services between the institutions), as well as to what should remain, or be, decentralised;
7. meni, da bi morali biti proračun Parlamenta in proračuni drugih institucij, najkasneje ob začetku naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira, rezultat večletnega načrtovanja, ki krije obdobje trajanja tega okvira;
Considers that, at the latest starting from the next multiannual financial framework, Parliament’s budget and the budgets of the other institutions should be the result of multiannual planning covering the duration of that framework;
17. meni, da bi morale vse institucije voditi aktivno nediskriminacijsko politiko, prilagoditi svoje stavbe in politiko na področju človeških virov, da bi zagotovile boljši dostop invalidom;
Believes that all the institutions should have active non-discrimination policies and should adapt their buildings and human resources policies to ensure easier access for people with disabilities;
22. poudarja, da proračun Parlamenta za leto 2011 znaša 1.685 milijonov EUR, kar je 20,03 % razdelka 5;
Points out that Parliament’s budget for 2011 amounts to EUR 1 685 m., representing 20.03% of heading 5;
27. poziva k temeljitem premisleku o tem, ali bi bilo mogoče pravico evropskih državljanov, da se snidejo s svojimi evropskimi predstavniki, učinkoviteje uravnotežiti z nujno potrebo po varnosti tistih, ki delajo v institucijah; zahteva, da generalni sekretar predloži to poročilo do 30. junija 2011;
Urges that a thorough review should be implemented as to whether the right of freedom of access for European citizens to meet with their European representatives could be more effectively matched with the urgent need to provide security for those who work in the institutions; asks the Secretary-General to submit such a report by 30 June 2011;
33. poudarja, da je informacijska in komunikacijska politika Parlamenta pomembna in bi morala doseči vse evropske državljane ter jim olajšati neposredne stike s Parlamentom, zato zahteva, da se ocenijo rezultati, doseženi s to politiko;
Points out that Parliament’s information and communication policy is important and should reach all European citizens and improve citizens’ ability to interact directly with Parliament, and therefore requests that the results attained with this policy be evaluated;