natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(3) Kazenske sankcije, ki izražajo družbeno neodobravanje drugačne narave kot upravne sankcije, močno povečujejo skladnost z veljavno zakonodajo na področju onesnaževanja morja z ladij ter bi morale biti dovolj stroge, da vse morebitne onesnaževalce odvračajo od kršitev .
(3) Criminal penalties, which demonstrate social disapproval of a different nature than administrative sanctions, greatly enhance compliance with the legislation against ship-source pollution in force and should be sufficiently severe to dissuade all potential polluters from any violation thereof .
Predlog spremembe povzema opredelitev iz 4. odstavka 4. člena Mednarodne konvencije o preprečevanju onesnaževanja morja z ladij (MARPOL), ki poudarja, da je treba spoštovanje predpisov namesto s kaznovanjem spodbujati z odvračanjem od kršitev.
Terms used in Article 4(4) of the Marpol Convention, which prefers the principle of dissuasion over repression, should be incorporated word for word.
(3a) Na ravni EU je bil že sprejet usklajen niz zakonodajnih ukrepov, da se okrepi pomorska varnost in pomaga preprečevati onesnaževanje morja z ladij.
(3a) A consistent set of legislative measures has already been adopted at EU level to reinforce maritime safety and help prevent ship-source pollution.
Ta zakonodaja je namenjena državam zastave, lastnikom ladij in naročnikom prevozov, klasifikacijskim zavodom, državam pristanišč in obalnim državam.
The legislation in question is addressed to flag States, ship owners and charterers, classification societies, port States and coastal States.
Obstoječi sistem sankcij za nezakonite izpuste z ladij, ki dopolnjuje to zakonodajo, je treba dodatno okrepiti z uvedbo kazenskih sankcij.
The existing system of sanctions for illegal ship-source discharges supplementing that legislation needs to be further strengthened by the introduction of criminal penalties .
Vzpostaviti bi bilo treba povezavo z obstoječo zakonodajo, da se zagotovi usklajenost zakonodaje in pravna varnost.
A link to current legislation should be made in order to guarantee legal consistency and legal certainty.
(4) Skupna pravila za kazenske sankcije omogočajo uporabo učinkovitejših preiskovalnih metod in pomoči znotraj držav članic ter med njimi.
(4) Common rules on criminal penalties make it possible to use more effective methods of investigation and assistance within and between Member States.
(4) Skupna pravila za kazenske sankcije omogočajo uporabo učinkovitejših preiskovalnih metod in zagotavljanje učinkovitega sodelovanja znotraj držav članic ter med njimi.
(4) Common rules on criminal penalties make it possible to use more effective methods of investigation and to ensure effective cooperation within and between Member States.
(5) Učinkovite , sorazmerne in odvračilne sankcije bi bilo treba uporabljati tudi za pravne osebe po vsej Skupnosti, saj se kršitve v zvezi z onesnaževanjem morja z ladij pogosto storijo v interesu pravnih oseb ali v njihovo korist.
(5) Effective , proportionate and dissuasive penalties should also apply to legal persons throughout the Community because frequently ship-source pollution offences are committed in the interest of legal persons or for their benefit.
(5) Države članice bi morale izvajati učinkovite , sorazmerne in odvračilne sankcije tudi proti pravnim osebam po vsej Skupnosti, saj se kršitve v zvezi z onesnaževanjem morja z ladij pogosto storijo v interesu pravnih oseb ali v njihovo korist.
(5) The Member States should also apply e ffective , proportionate and dissuasive penalties to legal persons throughout the Community because frequently ship-source pollution offences are committed in the interest of legal persons or for their benefit.
Z direktivo se pooblastila za ukrepanje podelijo stranem, ki izvajajo ukrepe, torej državam članicam, in sicer v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti in ob upoštevanju zapletenosti in raznolikosti zakonodaj o pravnih osebah.
The directive confers the power to act on the party taking the measures, namely the Member State, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle and in view of the complexity and diversity of legislation on legal persons.
(6) Države članice bi morale Komisiji predložiti podatke o izvajanju te direktive, da bi Komisija lahko ocenila njen učinek.
(6) Member States should provide information to the Commission on implementation of this Directive, in order to enable the Commission to evaluate its effect.
(6) Države članice bi morale biti dolžne Komisiji predložiti podatke o izvajanju te direktive, da bi Komisija lahko ocenila njen učinek.
(6) Member States should be obliged to provide information to the Commission on implementation of this Directive, in order to enable the Commission to evaluate its effect.
(7) Ker države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči cilja te direktive in ker se ta cilj zaradi čezmejne narave škode, ki jo lahko povzroči zadevno ravnanje, zato lažje doseže na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, kakor je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
(7) Since the objectives of this Directive cannot be achieved adequately by the Member States and, by reason of the cross-border damage which may be caused by the behaviour concerned, can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz istega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in the same Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
(7) (Ne zadeva slovenske jezikovne različice.)
(7) ( Does not affect English version ).
(Ne zadeva slovenske jezikovne različice.)
(Does not affect English version).
(7a) Sodbi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 13. septembra 2005 v zadevi C–176/03, Komisija proti Svetu, in z dne 23. oktobra 2007 v zadevi C–440/05, Komisija proti Svetu, pomenita, da sedaj Skupnost lahko naloži kazenske sankcije za nezakonite izpuste onesnaževalnih snovi z ladij, brez poseganja v pristojnosti držav članic, da nalagajo kazni druge vrste v zadevah, ki se ne obravnavajo kot kazniva dejanja.
7a) The judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 13 September 2005 in Case C ‑176/03, Commission v Council and of 23 October 2007 in Case C ‑440/05, Commission v Council, mean that it is now possible for the Community to impose criminal penalties for illicit ship-source discharges of polluting substances, notwithstanding the power of Member States to impose penalties of a different type for cases which are not regarded as a criminal offences.
Vključitev obravnavanja kaznivih dejanj ne bi smela pomeniti, da se prekrškov ne obravnava več.
The inclusion of criminal offences should not imply that administrative infringements no longer exist.
7b) Visoka raven varnosti in zaščite okolja v sektorju pomorskega prometa opravičuje pristojnost držav članic, da nezakonite izpuste manjšega obsega onesnaževalnih snovi z ladij obravnavajo kot prekrške v skladu s to direktivo.
7b) The high level of safety and protection of the environment in the maritime transport sector justifies the power of Member States to class illicit cases of minor ship-source discharges of polluting substances as administrative infringements under the terms of the current Directive.
Za učinkovitost načela „onesnaževalec plača”, po katerem stran, ki onesnažuje, plača za škodo, ki jo povzroči okolju, bi bilo treba primere ponavljajočih se manjših nezakonitih izpustov onesnaževalnih snovi kaznovati kot kazniva dejanja v skladu s to direktivo.
The effectiveness of the 'polluter pays' principle, whereby the polluting party pays for the damage caused to the environment, requires that illicit cases of minor but repeated ship-source discharges of polluting substances should be punished as criminal offences under the terms of this Directive.
Direktiva 2005/35/ES
Directive 2005/35/EC
(1a) V členu 1(1) se besede „v členu 8“ nadomestijo z „v členu 5a in 5c ter v ukrepih glede odgovornosti iz člena 5b“.
(1a) In Article 1(1) the words “in Article 8” shall be replaced by “in Articles 5a and 5c and the measures concerning liability as referred to in Article 5b”.
Člen 1(4), (5) in (6) te direktive uvaja sankcije in ukrepe glede odgovornosti, namesto člena 8 izvirne direktive 2005/35/ES, ki se v členu 1(7) te direktive črta.
Article 1 (4), (5) and (6) of this Directive are introducing penalties and measures of liability, instead of Article 8 of original Directive 2005/35/EC, whose Article 8 is deleted by Article 1 (7) of this Directive.
„ Kazniva dejanja
" Criminal offences
„ Kršitve in kazniva dejanja”
"Infringements and criminal offences
Države članice lahko kot prekrške obravnavajo primere nezakonitih izpustov manjšega obsega onesnaževalnih snovi z ladij na vseh območjih iz člena 3(1), če takšna dejanja ne povzročijo poslabšanja kakovosti vode.
The Member States may class as administrative infringements illicit cases of minor ship-source discharges of polluting substances into any of the areas referred to in Article 3(1) where the act committed does not cause a deterioration in the quality of the water.
Za tovrstne izpuste se v skladu s to direktivo uporablja izraz izpusti „manjšega obsega“.
Discharges of this type, under the terms of this Directive, shall be termed "minor" cases.
Predlog spremembe povzema določbe iz okvirnega sklepa 2005/667/PNZ (ta je sedaj razveljavljen), ki je ločeval med kazenskimi sankcijami in drugimi sankcijami (člen 4(2) okvirnega sklepa 2005/667/PNZ).
This reinstates a concept adopted in Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA (now annulled) that distinguished between criminal penalties and penalties of a different type (Article 4(2) of Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA).
Ravnanje, ki vključuje ponavljajoče se nezakonite izpuste manjšega obsega onesnaževalnih snovi z ladij se obravnava kot kaznivo dejanje, če so bili izpusti povzročeni naklepno, zaradi nepremišljenosti ali hude malomarnosti.
Behaviour involving repeated unlawful minor ship-source discharges of polluting substances shall be regarded as a criminal offence if the discharges have been made with intent, recklessly, or are due to serious negligence .
Kazni v vsakem primeru odražajo skupno število zadevnih izpustov manjšega obsega.
The penalty shall, in any event, reflect the total number of minor discharges concerned.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se napeljevanje h kaznivim dejanjem iz odstavka 1 oziroma pomoč ali podpora pri njih obravnava kot kaznivo po kazenskem pravu.“.
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that inciting or aiding and abetting a criminal offence referred to in paragraph 1 is punishable by criminal law.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se napeljevanje h kaznivim dejanjem iz odstavka 1 oziroma pomoč ali podpora pri njih , kadar gre za naklepna dejanja, obravnava kot kaznivo po kazenskem pravu.“.
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that inciting or aiding and abetting a criminal offence referred to in paragraph 1 is punishable by criminal law i n those cases where the offence i s committed with intent .
O napeljevanju h kaznivemu dejanju ali udeležbi pri njem lahko govorimo le v primeru naklepnih dejanj in ne tistih, storjenih iz nepremišljenosti ali hude malomarnosti.
Inciting or abetting can only occur where there is intent to deceive or act and not when the criminal offence occurs through recklessness or serious negligence.
(3a) Člen 5(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(3a ) A rt i cl e 5 ( 1 ) is replaced by the following :
Izpust onesnaževalnih snovi na katerem koli območju iz člena 3(1) se ne obravnava kot kršitev ali kot kaznivo dejanje , če izpolnjuje pogoje, navedene v pravilu 9, 10, 11(a) ali 11(c) iz Priloge I oz. pravilu 5, 6(a) ali 6(c) iz Priloge II k Marpol 73/78.
A discharge of polluting substances into any of the areas referred to in Article 3(1) shall not be regarded as an infringement or as a criminal offence if it satisfies the conditions set out in Annex I, Regulations 9, 10, 11(a) or 11(c) or in Annex II, Regulations 5, 6(a) or 6(c) of Marpol 73/78.
Če bo nova direktiva vključevala morebitna kazniva dejanja, ki jih je prej urejal preklicani okvirni sklep 2005/667/PNZ, je treba na to spremembo v direktivi opozoriti pri izjemah, ki se nanašajo tako na kazniva dejanja kot na manjše kršitve.
The inclusion in the new directive of possible criminal offences previously governed by annulled Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA requires that the amended directive clearly states that the exceptions refer both to criminal offences and to simple infringements.
(3 b) Člen 5(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(3 b) Article 5(2 ) i s replaced by the following :
Izpust onesnaževalnih snovi na katerem koli območju iz člena 3(1)(c), (d) in (e) se ne obravnava kot kršitev ali kot kaznivo dejanje lastnika, poveljnika ali posadke, ko ta deluje pod odgovornostjo poveljnika, če je v skladu s pogoji, navedenimi v pravilu 11(b) iz Priloge I ali pravilu 6(b) iz Priloge II k Marpol 73/78.
A discharge of polluting substances into the areas referred to in Article 3(1)(c), (d) and (e) shall not be regarded as an infringement or as a criminal offence for the owner, the master or the crew when acting under the master's responsibility if it satisfies the conditions set out in Annex I, Regulation 11(b) or in Annex II, Regulation 6(b) of Marpol 73/78 .
Člen 5 a – odstavek 1
Article 5 a – paragraph 1
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se kazniva dejanja iz člena 4 kaznujejo z učinkovitimi, sorazmernimi in odvračilnimi kazenskimi sankcijami.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the criminal offences referred to in Article 4 are punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se kršitve ali kazniva dejanja iz člena 4 ustrezno kaznujejo z učinkovitimi, sorazmernimi in odvračilnimi upravnimi ali kazenskimi sankcijami.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the infringements or criminal offences referred to in Article 4 are punishable by , respectively, effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative or criminal penalties.
Odstavek je bil spremenjen, da bi zagotovili skladnost s spremembami člena 4 direktive 2005/35/ES, ki kršitev ne omejuje na kazniva dejanja, temveč vključuje tudi prekrške.
This is changed to accord with the amendments to Article 4 of Directive 2005/35/EC, which does not restrict infringements to criminal offences but also takes in administrative infringements.
Člen 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 2 – subparagraph 1
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje v šestih mesecih po dnevu začetka veljavnosti Direktive.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than six months following the date of its entry into force.
Komisiji nemudoma sporočijo besedilo navedenih predpisov in predložijo korelacijsko tabelo med navedenimi predpisi in to direktivo.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje v 12 mesecih po dnevu začetka veljavnosti direktive.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than 12 months following the date of its entry into force.
Smiselno bi bilo treba podaljšati obdobje začetka uporabe direktive na največ dvanajst mesecev od začetka veljavnosti direktive.
A reasonable amount of time is needed for the directive's implementation, up to a maximum of twelve months from the date of its entry into force.
Podaljšanje na več kot eno leto ni potrebno, saj vsebina direktive v glavnem temelji na okvirnem sklepu 2005/667/PNZ), katerega rok za prenos je potekel 12. januarja, in so države članice zato že sprejele velik del ukrepov, potrebnih za izvajanje direktive.
Extending this beyond one year would not be realistic given that its text is largely based on Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA which had to be implemented by 12 January 2007, meaning that the Member States have already completed a large part of the work needed to implement the directive.
Člen 10 – odstavek 2 – točka a a (novo)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(7a) Po členu 10(2)(a) se doda naslednji odstavek:
(7a) After Article 10(2)(a), the following point is inserted:
„(aa) dejavnosti spremljanja in nadzora iz točke (a) se lahko poverijo interdisciplinarnemu laboratoriju za spremljanje (ta med drugim deluje na znanstvenem, pravnem in zdravstvenem področju), ki se ga ustanovi v okviru evropske agencijo za pomorsko varnost, obdeluje pa ustrezne podatke in ugotavlja vplive na zdravje ogroženega morskega ekosistema, zlasti z biološkega, kemičnega in fizikalnega vidika;“
“(aa) the monitoring and surveillance activities referred to in point (a) may be entrusted to an interdisciplinary monitoring laboratory (operating in, among other areas, the scientific, legal, and health fields) to be set up within the European Maritime Safety Agency, which shall process the relevant data and analyse their implications, not least in biological, chemical, and physical terms, for the health of the endangered marine ecosystem;”
Da bi se zoperstavila razširjenim težavam v pomorskem prometu, in sicer zaskrbljujoči rasti nezakonitih operativnih izpustov onesnaževalnih snovi z ladij, je Komisija leta 2003 predstavila predlog direktive
In order to tackle a widespread problem in sea transport, namely the worrying increase in illegal operational discharges of ship-source polluting substances, in 2003 the Commission submitted a proposal for a directive
COM(2003) 92 konč., 5. marec 2003. na podlagi drugega odstavka člena 80 Pogodbe o ES, ki se nanaša na promet in v katerem je zapisano, da lahko Svet s kvalificirano večino odloči, ali, v kolikšnem obsegu in po kakšnem postopku je treba sprejeti ustrezne predpise za pomorski in zračni promet.
COM(2003) 92 final of 5 March 2003. based on Article 80(2) (transport) of the EC Treaty which states that ‘The Council may, acting by a qualified majority, decide whether, to what extent and by what procedure appropriate provisions may be laid down for sea and air transport’.
Čeprav naj bi to vprašanje že reševala mednarodna konvencija Marpol 73/78, se te ni dovolj izvajalo oziroma spoštovalo, poleg tega pa sistemi civilne odgovornosti, ki so se uporabljali v primeru onesnaževanja z ladij, niso bili dovolj odvračilni.
Although international legislation to alleviate the situation already existed at that time – the Marpol 73-78 Convention – the shortcomings in its application and enforcement were becoming evident and it was also clear that the civil liability systems governing ship‑source pollution in force then were not dissuasive enough.
Predlog za direktivo je določal, da se onesnaževanje morja z ladij obravnava kot kaznivo dejanje in se kaznuje s kazenskimi sankcijami.
The proposal for a directive established that ship‑source pollution ought to be regarded as a criminal offence subject to criminal penalties.
Predlog je vseboval določbe s področja kazenskega prava, ki so presegale razvrščanje ravnanj (dejanj, ki bi jih bilo treba kaznovati) in so določale najosnovnejše predpise v zvezi s sankcijami, odgovornostjo in pristojnostjo ter smernice glede značaja sankcij.
It contained provisions on criminal law that went beyond categorising behaviour (actions that should be penalised) to set out minimum regulations on penalties, liability and jurisdiction, giving guidance on the nature of the penalties.
Ker so številne države članice nasprotovale pravni podlagi, ki jo je izbrala Komisija in ki je temeljila na prometni politiki iz prvega stebra, je bilo treba določbe direktive s področja kazenskega prava umakniti in nadomestiti s predlogom okvirnega sklepa Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve.
The objections tabled by a considerable number of Member States to the Commission's choice of legal basis, transport policy under the first pillar, meant that the criminal law provisions in the directive had to be withdrawn and a JHA framework decision was submitted in their place.
Parlament in Svet sta predloga sprejela maja 2005.
However, in May 2005, both proposals were adopted by Parliament and by the Council.
Direktiva 2005/35/ES o onesnaževanju morja z ladij in uvedbi kazni za kršitve vsebuje natančno opredelitev kršitev ter pravilo, da se za kršitve „uporabljajo učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazni, ki lahko vključujejo kazenskopravne ali upravne kazni“, medtem ko so določbe v zvezi z značajem, vrsto in ravnijo sankcij vključene v okvirni sklep 2005/667/PNZ.
Directive 2005/35/EC on ship‑source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements gives precise definitions of said infringements, and includes a clause stating that they are to be ‘subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, which may include criminal or administrative penalties’, while provisions on the nature, type and degree of the penalties were included in Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je 13. septembra 2005
On 13 September 2005
Zadeva C-176/03, Komisija proti Svetu, sodba z dne 13. septembra 2005. izreklo sodbo s pomembnimi pravnimi posledicami, saj je razsodilo, da lahko institucije Evropske unije na podlagi prvega stebra sprejemajo zakonodajo s področja kazenskega prava .
Case C-176/03, Commission v Council, judgment of 13 September 2005. , the Court of Justice of the European Communities (CJEC) gave a judgment with very significant legal repercussions in that it stipulated that the European Union institutions may, on the basis of the first pillar, legislate on criminal matters .
Nadalje je razsodilo, da lahko pod nekaterimi pogoji zakonodajalec Skupnosti sprejme ukrepe v zvezi s kazenskim pravom.
To be precise, the CJEC ruled that under certain conditions the Community legislator could provide for criminal-law-related measures.
Zaradi tega se je Komisija odločila, da sproži postopek, s katerim bi se okvirni sklep 2005/667/PNZ razglasil za ničnega, saj naj bi bil sprejet na napačni pravni podlagi (zadeva C- 440/05).
Subsequent to this, the Commission decided to bring a case for annulment of Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA taking the view that the framework decision had been adopted on the wrong legal basis (Case C-440/05).
Sodišče je dalo Komisiji prav in je 23. oktobra 2007 okvirni sklep razglasilo za ničnega, pri čemer je odločilo, da bi se členi sklepa o opredelitvi kaznivega dejanja in narave sankcij (členi 2, 3 in 5) lahko sprejeli na podlagi člena 80(2) pogodbe o ES in da je okvirni sklep zato kršil člen 47 pogodbe o EU, saj je posegal v pristojnosti Skupnosti.
The CJEC ruled in favour of the European Commission, and on 23 October 2007 it annulled the framework decision ruling that its articles categorising the criminal offences and the nature of the penalties ( A rt i cl e s 2, 3 and 5) could have been adopted on the basis of Article 80(2) (transport) of the EC Treaty , and that the framework decision therefore violated Article 47 of the EU Treaty by usurping the powers of the Community.
Cilj predloga
Aim of the proposal :
Zadevni predlog je namenjen zapolnitvi pravne vrzeli, nastale s sodbo sodišča, ki je zanemarila usklajen pristop pri sankcijah v boju proti onesnaževanju morja.
The proposal aims to fill a legal vacuum created by the CJEC decision that left on the sidelines a harmonised approach to possible penalties to combat maritime pollution.
Novi predlog Komisije nadgrajuje direktivo 2005/35/ES in povzema bistveno vsebino okvirnega sklepa 2005/667/PNZ, ki je bil razglašen za ničnega.
The Commission's new proposal is based on Directive 2005/35/EC and incorporates the essential elements of annulled Framework Decision 2005/667/JHA.
Napredek pri delu Parlamenta
Situation to date in Parliament :