natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalec opozarja, da je v državah članicah, ki so ubrale pot nacionalnih ali regionaliziranih enotnih premij na površino, redno prihajalo do prerazporeditve neposrednih plačil v prid obratov ekstenzivne živinoreje.
The rapporteur points out that in Member States which have opted for national or regionalised single payments by area, redistribution of direct payments in favour of livestock farms using extensive farming methods has regularly been seen.
Živinorejo pa je treba v skupnem obravnavati posebej.
Livestock farming must, however, on the whole be treated separately.
Je zelo dovzetna za krize, na kar kaže trenutno gibanje cen žita in posledične težave s krmo.
It is very susceptible to crises, as can be seen in the current price evolution of cereals and the resulting problems for feedstuffs.
Poleg tega so evropski standardi ravno na področju živinoreje in dobrega počutja živali precej višji kot v ostalem svetu in evropski proizvajalci imajo velike težave s prenosom dodatnih stroškov, ki so s tem povezani, na trg .
This is compounded by the European standards for precisely the fields of livestock farming and animal health being much higher than in other parts of the world, with European producers finding it extremely difficult to pass on the extra costs thus entailed.
Takšne razmere so dolgoročno nevzdržne, saj že sedaj povzročajo trajno upadanje števila živali.
This situation cannot be maintained in the long term; it is already leading to a continuous reduction in herds.
Živinoreja je tudi relativno delovno intenzivna panoga in je v številnih regijah zelo pomembna za regionalni razvoj ali ohranjanje pomembnih naravnih območij.
Livestock farming is also relatively labour-intensive and is very important in many regions for regional development or the maintenance of important natural areas.
Vezana plačila so lahko način za reševanje takšnih kriz.
Coupled payments may be a way of countering such crises.
Poročevalec zato ne podpira obvezne odprave obstoječih vezanih plačil, saj meni, da bi bilo treba vsa finančna sredstva, ki bi se sprostila na podlagi reformiranega člena 69, uporabiti zlasti za ohranitev sektorjev, ki so pomembni za neko regijo ali okolje, tj. tudi prav živinoreje.
The rapporteur is, therefore, not in favour of a compulsory elimination of existing coupled payments, and he considers that any funding which is freed as a result of a reformed Article 69 should be used, not least, to preserve sectors which are regionally or environmentally significant, in particular livestock farming.
Poročevalec podpira tudi vključitev za upravljanje zapletenih, manjših plačilnih sistemov na podlagi proizvodnje v model nevezanih neposrednih plačil (suha krma, lan, konoplja, krompirjev škrob) in odpravo obveznosti prahe, ki kot sistem za nadzor količine v nevezanem in večinoma tržno naravnanem sistemu podpore ni več smiselna.
The rapporteur also supports the integration of smaller production-linked payment systems which are cumbersome to administer into the decoupled direct payment model (dried fodder, flax, hemp, potato starch) and the elimination of the set-aside obligation, which no longer has a place as a volume-control system in a decoupled support system which is largely market-oriented.
Skromne koristi za okolje je mogoče bolje doseči z nacionalno zakonodajo ali, če je to primerno, s spremembo Priloge IV k Uredbi št. 1782/2003 o ohranjanju dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev.
The modest environmental benefits can better be achieved through national legislation or, if appropriate, a change to Annex IV of Regulation 1782/2003 on the preservation of good agricultural and environmental condition.
Premija za energetske rastline je prav tako v nasprotju s sistemom.
The energy crop premium also runs counter to the system.
Sproščena sredstva bi tako lahko porabili za podporne ukrepe v skladu s členom 69 in zlasti za prehodne ukrepe v sektorju mleka.
The funds which are thus freed could be spent on support measures according to Article 69, and particularly on transition measures for the dairy sector.
O navzkrižni skladnosti, ki je ključni element, če ne kar sama utemeljitev sistema neposrednih plačil, je Parlament šele pred kratkim podal svoje mnenje.
Parliament has only recently given a comprehensive outline of its position on cross‑compliance, which is a vital element, if not the raison d'être, of the direct payment system.
Standarde je mogoče razširiti samo v primeru jasnih obremenitev (presoja vplivov) in, kadar je to primerno, v primeru predhodne odprave drugih standardov.
The standards can only be expanded if the burdens are clear (impact assessment) and, where appropriate, other standards are first abolished.
Šele s prehodom na enotne ali enotnejše premije na površino se kaže in postaja očitno, da je intenzivnost pomoči skupne kmetijske politike regionalno zelo različna (kar nenazadnje deloma velja tudi za drugi steber).
The transition to single or more uniform payments by area is highlighting and revealing the significant regional differences in the level of CAP support (this also applies, in part, to the second pillar).
Komisija naj bi o tem pravočasno pred letom 2013 predložila poročilo.
The Commission should submit a report in good time before 2013.
Tako velike razlike bi se lahko morda odpravile z močnejšo odvisnostjo plačil od izvajanja storitev splošnega interesa.
A possible way of removing such differences could be for payments to be geared more closely to the performance of services of general interest.
Tržni instrumenti/preprečevanje tveganj
Market instruments/risk insurance
Poročevalec je prepričan, da bo glede na občutnejša nihanja podnebja, nove bolezni živali in naraščanje hitrosti, s katero se širijo, in odpiranjem evropskega kmetijstva svetovnemu trgu stalno naraščalo število kriz v zvezi s pridelkom, dohodki in epidemijami.
The rapporteur considers that, in the light of more marked climatic fluctuations, new animal diseases and the growing speed at which these are spreading, and the opening of European agriculture to the world market, there will be a continuous increase in crises pertaining to yield, income and epidemics.
Nujno je potrebna dodatna varnostna mreža.
There is an urgent need for an extra safety net.
Sedanji instrumenti so v teh okoliščinah neustrezni ali pa jih je treba nadomestiti z novimi sistemi.
The current instruments are either inadequate in this context or need to be replaced by new systems.
Mogoče si je zamisliti uvedbo shem paketnih zavarovanj, vzpostavitev sklada, ipd.
Introducing multi-hazard insurance schemes or setting up a fund would seem feasible.
Državno sofinanciranje takšnih sistemov je ključnega pomena in je stalna praksa pri vseh velikih trgovinskih partnerjih na svetovnem trgu.
State co-financing of such systems is vital and is standard practice for all major trading partners in the world market.
Sedaj je treba storiti prvi korak.
We must take the first step now.
Pri tem ne smemo pozabiti, da so tveganja v Evropi med sektorji in regijami zelo neenakomerno razporejena in da je sprejemljivost neke rešitve močno odvisna od kmetijske strukture in izkušenj kmetov v posameznih regijah.
In doing so, we must not forget that the risks in Europe are distributed very unevenly across sectors and regions, and that the acceptance of a solution depends to a large extent on the agricultural structure and the experiences of farmers in the individual regions.
Zato bi bilo treba v prvi fazi uvesti rešitve na regionalni ali nacionalni ravni.
The first phase should therefore be to introduce solutions at regional or national level.
V okviru prerazporeditve do 2 % sredstev neposrednih plačil bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da na osnovi lastnih odločitev izdelajo ustrezne sisteme obvladovanja tveganj.
Within the framework of the redistribution of up to 2% of funds from direct payments, Member States should be given the opportunity to develop appropriate risk management systems based on their own decisions.
Komisija mora zaradi izkrivljanja konkurence izvajati strog nadzor.
The Commission must implement strict monitoring with regard to distortions of competition.
To bi lahko dosegla npr. z vzpostavitvijo skupnega okvira pravil v enotni tržni ureditvi.
This could be done, for example, by establishing common framework rules within the single market organisation.
Komisija in države članice morajo nujno preveriti sodelovanje skupin proizvajalcev ali sektorskih združenj.
The participation of producer groups or sectoral associations should be examined by the Commission and Member States.
Poročevalec meni, da dosedanjih sistemov, kot so intervencije ali skladiščenje, ne bi smeli povsem ukiniti, temveč da bi jih bilo treba v smislu njihove funkcije zmanjšati na dejansko varnostno mrežo za primere izjemnega povišanja cen, torej izredne dogodke.
The rapporteur considers that the systems used so far, such as intervention or storage, should not be completely abandoned but reduced in terms of their function to a genuine safety net in the event of extreme price increases, i.e. exceptional events.
V tem kontekstu podpira predloge Komisije.
He supports the Commission’s proposals in this context.
Plačila/drugi steber
Payments/second pillar
Komisija za neposredna plačila predlaga različna zmanjšanja:
The Commission proposes various reductions for direct payments:
· zvišanje najnižjih pragov,
· increasing minimum thresholds,
· uvedba močne, postopne degresivnosti pri plačilih nad 100 000 EUR in
· introducing significant, stepped degressivity in the case of payments in excess of EUR 100 000, and
· nadaljnja letna 2-odstotna modulacija za obdobje 2010–2013 (skupaj 8 % leta 2013).
· a further annual modulation of 2% for the 2010 - 2013 period (making a total of 8% in 2013).
Poročevalec zavrača predlagana zmanjšanja v tej obliki.
The rapporteur rejects the proposed reductions as they appear here.
Predlog bi bil upravičen, če bi bil edini cilj neposrednih plačil podpora dohodkom gospodinjstev – tudi če bi se kasneje izkazalo, da majhni prejemniki pogosto ne potrebujejo tolikšne podpore.
The proposal could be justified if the sole aim of the direct payments were to support household income – even if this would mean small beneficiaries often appearing to be in less need of funding.
Poročevalec zavrača predvideno degresivnost, ki bi prizadela predvsem kmetije in regije v vzhodni Nemčiji, na Češkem in Slovaškem, v Veliki Britaniji in Španiji in ki bi npr. v nekaterih regijah vzhodne Nemčije skupaj z drugimi načrtovanimi zmanjšanji privedla do ukinitve 1/3 plačil.
The rapporteur rejects the planned degressivity, which would mainly affect farms and regions in Eastern Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Great Britain and Spain and would lead, for example, to the suppression of over 1/3 of payments in some regions of Eastern Germany when taken together with the other planned reductions.
Predlagana degresivnost bi vsekakor privedla do gospodarsko nesmiselnega prestrukturiranja kmetij ali opuščanja mejnih obdelovalnih površin, zlasti na zapostavljenih območjih, kmetijska politika pa z njo ne bo ničesar pridobila.
The proposed degressivity would, moreover, lead to the economically senseless restructuring of farms or the abandonment of marginal land precisely in disadvantaged areas, and offers no agropolitical gains.
Doslej še ni bila opravljena nobena presoja vplivov zmanjšanj na posamezne kmetije, regionalne trge dela ali celotne regije, manjka pa tudi kmetijsko-gospodarska utemeljitev.
There has been no impact assessment of the effects of the reductions on individual farms, regional labour markets or entire regions, nor has any justification on agroeconomic grounds been advanced.
Pričakovati je, da bi degresivnost v predlagani obliki dobila povsem negativno oceno, če bi jo obravnavali v čisto kmetijsko-gospodarskem smislu, saj v slabši položaj postavlja predvsem premožne kmetije.
We would expect the degressivity in its proposed form to receive a completely negative evaluation if considered in a purely agroeconomic sense, as it principally puts strong farms at a disadvantage.
Visoka degresivnost, ki poleg tega ne upošteva posebnih struktur v nekaterih regijah, števila delavcev, lastniške strukture ali posebnih regionalnih značilnosti, ni in ne more biti sprejemljiva.
High degressivity, which, moreover, disregards the specific structures in certain regions, the number of workers, the composition of ownership or special regional characteristics, is unacceptable.
Kljub temu pa se poročevalec strinja, da je do določene mere mogoče izhajati iz načela, da večja podjetja delujejo učinkoviteje in zato potrebujejo manj pomoči.
However, the rapporteur agrees that, to a certain extent, we can assume that larger enterprises operate more efficiently and therefore require less assistance.
Hkrati meni, da ima drugi steber na voljo premalo finančnih sredstev.
He also considers the second pillar to be underfinanced.
Ker realno gledano drugi finančni viri niso na voljo, predlaga zmerno prerazporeditev s „progresivno modulacijo“ .
Since there are, realistically, no other sources of financing available, he proposes a moderate redeployment along the lines of a ‘progressive modulation’ .
Glede na to bi bila struktura modulacije naslednja:
This would involve the following:
10 000 – 100 000 EUR - 1% (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
EUR 10 000 - 100 000 - 1% (for the whole 2009 - 2013 period)
100 000 – 200 000 EUR - 2% (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
EUR 100 000 - 200 000 - 2% (for the whole 2009 - 2013 period)
200 000 – 300 000 EUR - 3% (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
EUR 200 000 - 300 000 - 3% (for the whole 2009 - 2013 period)
nad 300 000 EUR - 4% (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
over EUR 300 000 - 4% (for the whole 2009 - 2013 period)
Z mejno vrednostjo v višini 10 000 EUR se bodo razbremenile srednje velike družinske kmetije, medtem ko bo učinek financiranja ugoden tudi za drugi steber, saj se bo modulacija začela že leta 2009 in bo, čeprav v zelo omejenem obsegu, za razliko od predloga Komisije o degresivnosti vključevala tudi kmetije med 10 000 in 100 000 EUR.
The exemption level of EUR 10 000 means that pressure on middle-sized family farms will be relieved, and there is a beneficial financing effect for the second pillar, as the modulation will begin in 2009 and, unlike the Commission proposal concerning degressivity, will also include farms with between EUR 10 000 and 100 000, albeit to a very limited extent.
Vendar pa tudi ta predlog ne more odpraviti temeljne pomanjkljivosti, tj. da imata modulacija in degresivnost največji prerazporeditveni učinek za drugi steber v regijah z večjimi kmetijskimi strukturami in s tem praviloma v najmanj zapostavljenih državah članicah.
Not even this proposal can remove the basic flaw, whereby modulation and degressivity have the greatest redeployment effect in favour of the second pillar in regions with larger farm structures and therefore, generally, in those Member States which are least disadvantaged.
Na drugi strani je treba opozoriti, da bi se več kot 50 % vseh sredstev, ki bi nastala zaradi degresivnosti, nabralo v vzhodni Nemčiji, kar bi regionalno neravnotežje še močno poostrilo.
It should be noted, on the other hand, that over 50% of funds accruing from degressivity would be generated in Eastern Germany, further sharply increasing regional imbalances.
Finančna sredstva iz prerazporeditev bi bilo treba porabiti predvsem v regijah, v katerih nastajajo, in za ukrepe, namenjene preprečevanju tveganj, okrepitev in prestrukturiranje pomembnih kmetijskih sektorjev in tu zlasti trga za mleko, kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe (vključno s prilagajanjem podnebnim spremembam), zaščito ali zdravje živali, ali za ukrepe za boljšo uporabo novih znanstvenih odkritij v kmetijstvu, npr. na področju bioenergije.
Funds resulting from redeployment should be used primarily in regions in which they accrue and for measures targeting risk insurance, the reinforcement and restructuring of important agricultural sectors, in particular the milk market, agri-environment measures (including adapting to climate change), animal protection or animal health, or measures aimed at the improved application of new scientific discoveries in agriculture, e.g. in the field of bioenergy.
Poročevalec bi želel zgolj opozoriti, da med največjimi prejemniki neposrednih plačil niso le kraljevske hiše, ampak tudi okoljske organizacije.
The rapporteur would just like to point out that the largest beneficiaries of direct payments include not only royal houses but also environmental organisations.
Celotna razprava kaže na to, da bi morala biti neposredna plačila v prihodnje, tj. po letu 2013, tesneje povezana s konkretnimi dosežki in posameznimi dodatnimi bremeni za kmete.
The discussion shows that in the future – i.e. after 2013 – direct payments should be more closely linked to specific efforts and particular additional burdens on farmers.
Razprava o višini plačil bi bila s tem izključena.
A discussion on the level of payments would then be ruled out.
Poročevalec meni, da se sistem mlečnih kvot v sedanji obliki glede na dosedanja sporočila Komisije in Sveta po letu 2015 verjetno ne bo ohranil.
On the basis of statements made by the Commission and the Council, the rapporteur thinks it unlikely that the system of milk quotas will be continued in its current form beyond 2015.
Odločilni vidik pri tem je zagotovitev proizvodnje mleka v nekaterih regijah, kjer mlekarstvo ni nadomestljivo in kjer je oblikovalo krajinsko podobo.
Key aspects should include the safeguarding of milk production in certain regions in which there are no alternatives to the dairy industry and in which the landscape has been shaped by the dairy industry.
Ob zagotavljanju proizvodnje mleka je treba krepiti sektor kot celoto, torej celotno proizvodno verigo vse do prodaje končnih proizvodov, kar je za Evropo, ki se tradicionalno osredotoča na proizvode z dodano vrednostjo, odločilnega pomena (npr.: sir).
The safeguarding of milk production must, therefore, go hand in hand with strengthening the sector as a whole, i.e. strengthening the whole of the production chain up to the distribution of final products, which, for Europe, with its traditional focus on value added products, is of key importance (e.g. cheese).
Po mnenju poročevalca se prav s spremembo člena 69 ponuja možnost, da se v okviru prvega stebra poiščejo nove, celostne rešitve, ki bodo ustrezale regionalnim potrebam.
The rapporteur considers that a revised Article 69 would provide the opportunity to develop, within the framework of the first pillar, new, integrated solutions adapted to regional needs.
Ker nekatere evropske regije razen vzreje goveda, namenjenega za proizvodnjo mleka, nimajo praktično nobenih drugih možnosti in ker je treba proizvodnjo mleka zaradi ohranjanja krajine in regionalne politike ohraniti za vsako ceno, je treba za te regije, pa tudi za sektor kot celoto, pripraviti posebne podporne ukrepe.
Since, in some European regions, there is in practical terms no alternative to dairy farming and milk production must be maintained, for reasons of landscape conservation and regional policy, special support measures must be developed for such regions and also for the sector as a whole.
To so lahko posebni dodatki, vezane ali nevezane premije ali sektorski ukrepi prestrukturiranja.
These might take the form of special top‑ups, coupled or decoupled premiums or sectoral restructuring measures.
Poleg tega bi bilo mogoče uporabiti sredstva iz odprave premije za energetske rastline, dohodkov iz dodatnih dajatev ali neizkoriščenosti sredstev iz ureditve trga z mlekom, ki so se doslej uporabljala drugje.
Funds released by the abolition of the energy crop premium and income from the superlevy or the non‑use of funds previously used in other areas of the organisation of the milk market might also be used.
Nadaljnji vidik mehkega prehoda bi lahko bil, da se postopoma in v odvisnosti od položaja na tržišču razvrednotijo pravice do kvot.
A further aspect of a soft landing could be a gradual depreciation of quotas depending on the market situation.
Preveriti bi bilo treba, ali ne bi bil dvig kvot z naknadnim vseevropskim saldiranjem, ki bi omogočalo bistveno boljši izkoristek trenutno dodeljenih kvot, povsem ali deloma odveč.
It should be examined whether Europe‑wide ex‑post offsetting of quotas, which would enable the current quota to be significantly better utilised, would not make a quota increase wholly or partly unnecessary.
Poročevalec je podal nekaj predlogov za nadaljnji razvoj paketov ukrepov za drugi steber, ki ne potrebujejo dodatne razlage (izboljšanje kakovostne proizvodnje, boljši prodor na trg, prilagoditev podnebnim spremembam, boljša povezava z lizbonskimi cilji).
The rapporteur has made several suggestions for further development of the packages of measures in the second pillar which require no further explanation (improving quality production, better market penetration, adapting to climate change, closer alignment with the Lisbon objectives).
V zvezi s pripravo na obdobje financiranja po letu 2013 poročevalec tudi pričakuje, da bo Komisija pripravila obsežno analizo in oceno obstoječih in morebitnih prihodnjih ukrepov, za nadaljnje izboljšanje natančnosti ukrepov skupne kmetijske politike.
As preparation for the financing period after 2013, the rapporteur would also like to see the Commission produce a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of existing and potential future measures, with the aim of further improving the targeting of the range of measures in the CAP.
S spremembo člena 69 se odpira veliko možnosti za pripravo politike prihodnosti.
The revision of Article 69 opens up many opportunities for preparing for future policy.
Zato je poročevalec tudi predlagal povečanje sredstev, ki so na voljo za to področje, v primerjavi s predlogom Komisije za 5 %, da se zberejo izkušnje z regionalnimi, okoljskimi in sektorskimi podpornimi instrumenti v prvem stebru, ki jih je treba potem ovrednotiti in tako pripraviti nadaljnje reforme po letu 2013.
The rapporteur is therefore proposing that funding made available in this area be increased by 5% compared with the Commission document in order to enable experience to be gained with regional, environmental and sectoral support instruments under the first pillar, experience which will then need to be evaluated in order to prepare for further post‑2013 reform.
Ilda Figueiredo, Diamanto Manolakou, Vincenzo Aita
by Ilda Figueiredo, Diamanto Manolakou, Vincenzo Aita.
Skupna kmetijska politika ne upošteva niti potreb potrošnikov, saj cene živil neprestano rastejo, niti potreb družinskih, malih in srednje velikih podjetij, ki so prisiljena opuščati proizvodnjo.
The CAP does not satisfy the needs of consumers, since food prices are constantly rising, or the needs of family and small and medium-sized holdings, which are forced to abandon production.
Z reformo iz leta 2003 so se razmere še poslabšale.
The 2003 reform exacerbated the situation.
Reforme skupne ureditve trgov za sladkor, sadje, zelenjavo, tobak, vino itd. potrjujejo, da skupna kmetijska politika daje prednost velikim podjetjem pred malimi, intenzivnemu kmetijstvu pred ekstenzivnimi načini obdelave, strnjenosti tal ter nadvladi monopolov pri proizvodnji in prodaji kmetijskih proizvodov.
The reforms of the common organisations of the markets in sugar, fruit and vegetables, tobacco, wine, etc. confirm that the CAP favours large enterprises to the detriment of smaller ones, intensive farming to the detriment of extensive methods, the concentration of land, and the dominance of monopolies in the production and distribution of agricultural produce.
Komisija vztraja pri napačni usmeritvi, tako da ločuje pomoč od proizvodnje in zaposlovanja ter krči sredstva, namenjena za skupno kmetijsko politiko.
The Commission is persisting in the wrong direction by decoupling aid from production and employment and in cutting back appropriations for the CAP.
Nadaljuje politiko podpore multinacionalnih živilskih korporacij in lastnikov velikih posesti.
It is continuing to pursue its policy of support for the multinational food corporations and large-scale landowners.