natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 11(5) se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje petih let od ….
The powers to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 11(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from ...*.
Komisija pripravi poročilo o pooblastilu najpozneje šest mesecev pred iztekom petletnega obdobja.
The Commission shall make a report in respect of the delegated powers not later than six months before the end of the five-year period.
Prenos pooblastila se samodejno podaljša za enaka obdobja, razen če ga Evropski parlament ali Svet ne prekliče v skladu s členom 17.
The delegation of powers shall be automatically extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council revokes it in accordance with Article 17.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz členov 11(5) in 12(5) se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje petih let od …*.
The powers to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 11(5) and Article 12(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from ...*.
Te podatke zbirajo kot del svojih splošnih sistemov za zbiranje zdravstvenih podatkov v skladu z nacionalnimi zakonodajami in zakonodajo Unije za pripravo statistike in o varstvu osebnih podatkov, zlasti s členom 8(4) Direktive 95/46/ES.
They shall collect such data as part of their general systems for collecting healthcare data, in accordance with national and Union law for the production of statistics and on the protection of personal data , and specifically Article 8(4) of Directive 95/46/EC .
Države članice Komisiji vsaj enkrat letno predložijo podatke iz odstavka 1, razen podatkov, ki se že zbirajo v skladu z Direktivo 2005/36/ES.
Member States shall transmit the data referred to in paragraph 1 to the Commission at least annually, except for data that are already collected pursuant to Directive 2005/36/EC.
Komisija v skladu z regulativnim postopkom iz člena 15(2), brez poseganja v ukrepe, sprejete za izvajanje statističnega programa Skupnosti, ter ukrepe, sprejete za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1338/2008, sprejme ukrepe za izvajanje tega člena.
Without prejudice to the measures adopted for the implementation of the Community Statistical Programme as well as to those adopted for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008 , the Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 15 (2), adopt measures for the implementation of this Article.
Javni organi v državi članici zdravljenja v skladu s členom 4 redno spremljajo dostopnost, kakovost in finančno stanje svojih sistemov zdravstvenega varstva na podlagi podatkov, zbranih po odstavku 1.
In accordance with Article 4 , the public authorities in the Member State of treatment shall monitor regularly the accessibility, quality and financial state of their healthcare systems on the basis of the data collected under paragraph 1.
Komisija po regulativnem postopku iz člena 15(2) sprejme:
The Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 15 (2), adopt:
(a) potrebne ukrepe upravljanje mreže nacionalnih kontaktnih točk iz člena 6 ter opredeli naravo in vrsto informacij za izmenjavo v okviru te mreže;
(a) measures necessary for the management of the network of national contact points provided for in Article 6 , the nature and type of data to be collected and exchanged within this network;
(b) smernice o informacijah za paciente, določene v členih 5 in 6.
(b) guidelines on information to patients provided for in Article s 5 and 6.
Komisija v skladu z regulativnim postopkom iz člena 15(2) sprejme ukrepe, potrebne za enotno raven varstva zdravstvenih podatkov na nacionalni ravni, ob upoštevanju obstoječih tehničnih standardov na tem področju.
The Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory pro cedure referred to in Article 15 (2 ) , adopt measures necessary for achieving a common security level of health data at national level, taking into account existing te chnical standards in this field .
(Stališče EP– členi 21, 5(2), 5(3) in 5(4))
(EP position Article 21 and Article 5(2), 5(3) and 5(4))
PS 59 in 140 iz prve obravnave
1st reading - AM 59 and 140
Države članice do … * sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by….** They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
Države članice Komisiji posredujejo besedilo teh predpisov ter korelacijsko tabelo med temi predpisi in to direktivo.
Member States shall communicate the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
** UL: 3 leta od dneva začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
** OJ: 3 years from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
** UL: 1 leto od dneva začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
** OJ: 1 year from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Pri vprašanju dostopnosti do zdravstvenega varstva in povračila stroškov ter pristojnosti za klinično spremljanje, povezanem s čezmejnim zdravstvenim varstvom, je še vedno preveč nedorečenega.
Today, there is too much uncertainty surrounding the issues of access to care, reimbursements and responsibility for clinical follow-up in relation to cross-border healthcare.
Ta direktiva bi morala vsem pacientom, ne le najbolj obveščenim in najbogatejšim, omogočiti, da bi uživali nekatere pravice na področju zdravstvenega varstva, ki jih je že priznalo Sodišče Evropske unije.
This directive is intended to allow all patients – and not only the best informed or richest – to enjoy a series of healthcare rights which have already been recognised by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Sistemi socialne varnosti, njihova organizacija in upravljanje so v popolni pristojnosti držav članic.
The Member States will retain full responsibility for organising and managing social security systems.
Predlog zadeva paciente in njihovo mobilnost v Evropski uniji, ne pa prostega pretoka izvajalcev storitev.
The proposal concerns patients and their mobility within the EU, not the free movement of service providers.
Nikakor ne gre spodbujati čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva kot takega, treba pa ga je omogočiti, kadar je koristno ali potrebno, ter zagotoviti njegovo varnost in kakovost.
The aim is absolutely not to encourage cross-border healthcare as such, but to ensure its availability, safety and quality when it is of use or necessary.
Bolje in jasneje moramo biti obveščeni o pravnih predpisih o zdravljenju v državi članici, ki ni država pacientovega zdravstvenega zavarovanja.
We need better information and more clarity regarding the legal rules applicable to travel to a Member State other than the Member State of affiliation for the purpose of receiving healthcare.
Sedanje razmere niso zadovoljive, saj obstajata dva različna pravna okvira, ki se uporabljata vzporedno: na eni strani Uredba št. 883/2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti v državah članicah, na drugi pa postopno oblikovanje pravnega okvira z sodno prakso Sodišča.
The current situation is unsatisfactory, since two different sets of legal rules apply: Regulation No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and the rules established over the years by the case law of the Court of Justice.
Direktiva mora biti paciente omogočati izbiro, ki bo temeljila na njihovih potrebah, ne pa na finančnih sredstvih, ter na utemeljenih odločitvah, ne na prisili.
The directive is intended to offer patients a choice which is based on their needs, not their means, and which is informed, not made under duress.
Prva obravnava v Parlamentu
First reading in Parliament
Parlament je 23. aprila 2009 v prvi obravnavi obravnaval predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva.
On 23 April 2009, Parliament adopted, at first reading, the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare.
V njej je želel uzakoniti sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije s tega področja.
Parliament sought to codify the case law of the Court of Justice on cross-border healthcare in this directive.
Direktiva na primer omogoča, da lahko pacienti v najkrajšem možnem času prejmejo potrebne storitve zdravstvenega varstva.
For example, the directive aims to give patients the possibility of receiving the necessary healthcare faster.
Mobilnost pacientom dejansko omogoča, da se popolnoma zakonito izognejo čakalnim vrstam v svoji državi z uporabo zdravstvenih zmogljivosti, ki so na voljo v drugih evropskih državah.
Patient mobility allows national waiting lists to be sidestepped legitimately, since it enables patients to benefit from available medical capacity in other Member States.
Tudi zaradi napredka v medicini ni več mogoče najti storitev zdravstvenega varstva za vse bolezni v bližini doma in je včasih zanje treba iti v tujino.
Furthermore, medical progress means that healthcare cannot be provided locally for all diseases and must be provided across borders in some cases.
V direktivi so opredeljena naslednja načela: državljani bodo lahko brez predhodne odobritve v drugi državi članici prejeli vso nebolnišnično oskrbo, do katere so upravičeni v svoji državi članici, in se jim bodo stroški povrnili do zneska, ki je predviden za povračilo v njihovem sistemu.
The directive establishes the following principles: patients may receive all the non-hospital healthcare to which they are entitled in their own Member State in another Member State without prior approval and be reimbursed up to the ceiling established by their own healthcare system.
Državljani bodo lahko v drugi državi članici prejeli vso bolnišnično oskrbo, do katere so upravičeni v svoji državi članici, in se jim bodo stroški povrnili do zneska, ki je predviden za povračilo v njihovem sistemu.
Patients may receive all the hospital healthcare to which they are entitled in their own Member State in another Member State and be reimbursed up to the ceiling established by their own healthcare system.
Predlog vsebuje posebno zaščitno klavzulo v primeru, če bi lahko nepredvideno povečanje obsega čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva povzročilo hude težave.
The proposal includes a specific safeguard clause for cases where an unpredictable rise in the volume of cross-border healthcare threatens to create serious difficulties.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije direktiva omogoča, da država članica vzpostavi sistem predhodne odobritve za bolnišnično oskrbo, če je to potrebno za zaščito njenega sistema zdravstvenega varstva.
In accordance with the Court of Justice’s case law, the directive allows a Member State to require prior authorisation for hospital care if this is necessary in order to protect its healthcare system.
Bistveno je tudi zagotavljanje informacij, zato bo morala vsaka država ustanoviti nacionalne kontaktne točke, kjer se bodo lahko pacienti seznanili s storitvami zdravstvenega varstva, ki so na voljo, postopki, ki jih je treba opraviti, ali postopki za vložitev pritožb in ugovorov.
Information is also a key issue, and each Member State will be obliged to maintain national contact points to inform patients about the availability of healthcare, administrative procedures, complaints and appeals and so on.
Evropski parlament je v prvi obravnavi jasno izrazil podporo direktivi, ki bo evropskim državljanom zagotovila varnost, saj ne želi, da bi o vsakem posameznem primeru odločala sodišča.
At first reading, Parliament came out clearly in favour of a directive which would provide certainty for patients, not wishing to leave it up to the courts to decide on a case-by-case basis.
Evropski poslanci so želeli okrepiti tudi sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju zdravstvenega varstva z nekaterimi ukrepi, kot je razvoj e-zdravstvenih storitev ali vzajemno priznavanje zdravniških receptov.
Finally, Parliament wished to strengthen healthcare cooperation between Member States by means of a number of measures, including the development of ‘e-health’ and the mutual recognition of prescriptions.
Druga obravnava v Evropskem parlamentu
Second reading in Parliament
Junija 2010 je bil v Svetu dosežen politični dogovor,
In June 2010, a political agreement was reached in the Council.
čeprav v njem niso bile upoštevane spremembe, ki jih je predlagal Evropski parlament.
The Council did not, however, take Parliament’s amendments on board.
Ob upoštevanju izida pogajanj v Svetu pa je v predlogu iz druge obravnave kar najbolj upoštevano stališče, ki ga je Evropski parlament z veliko večino glasov sprejel v prvi obravnavi.
Whilst taking into account the outcome of the negotiations in the Council, the draft recommendation for second reading seeks to remain as close as possible to the position which Parliament adopted at first reading by a large majority.
Ta predlog je v skladu z odločenostjo Sveta, da se bori proti zdravstvenemu turizmu.
This recommendation for second reading is in keeping with the Council’s desire to combat medical tourism.
Poleg tega je Sodišče priznalo utemeljenost predhodnih odobritev za bolnišnično oskrbo, ki izrecno izhajajo iz potrebe po načrtovanju in racionalizaciji zdravstvenega varstva, da bi preprečili preobremenjenost, neuravnoteženost in logistične izgube, na nacionalnem ozemlju pa bi ohranili vsem dostopne zdravniške in bolnišnične storitve ter kompetence.
The Court of Justice has approved the principle of prior authorisation for hospital care, which is explicitly based on the need to plan and rationalise healthcare in order to avoid overcapacity, imbalances and logistical waste, maintain universal medical and hospital services and keep indispensible skills in each Member State.
Poudariti je treba, da sodbe niso toliko zadevale postopka odobritve, temveč bolj njegovo zlorabo, s čimer se je pacientom zavračala pravica do potovanja zaradi zdravljenja ali oviralo uveljavljanje te pravice.
Nevertheless, it is important to note that the case law concerned not the authorisation procedure in itself, but the manner in which it has been abused to deny patients the right to travel to receive healthcare or to hinder the use of that right.
Zato je cilj vzpostaviti sistem predhodne odobritve, ki bo za paciente poenostavljen, upravljavcem zdravstvenega varstva pa bo omogočal, da bodo predčasno opozorjeni na izredne stroške.
The objective, therefore, is to introduce a simplified prior authorisation system for patients which will nevertheless ensure that healthcare managers are given advance warning of any exceptional costs.
Merila kakovosti in varnosti zdravstvenega varstva, ki jih je predlagal Svet, je težko opredeliti in ovrednotiti.
The ‘quality and safety of healthcare’ criteria proposed by the Council are too vague to be assessed adequately.
Namen predloga Parlamenta je tudi okrepitev pravic pacientov, zlasti z zagotovitvijo informacij in sodelovanjem med državami članicami.
Parliament’s proposal also aims to strengthen patients' rights, particularly by ensuring the provision of information and cooperation between Member States.
Dolžnost države članice pacientovega zdravstvenega zavarovanja je, da svojim državljanom zagotovi dostop do informacij.
The Member State of affiliation must ensure that its nationals have access to information.
Kar zadeva e-zdravstvene storitve, so v stališču Sveta samo splošne izjave.
As regards ‘e-health’, the Council's position only makes general statements.
Predlog iz druge obravnave želi iti dlje in že vnaprej upošteva možnosti e-zdravstvenih storitev, ki jih je treba regulirati.
The recommendation for second reading seeks to go beyond these statements by taking proper account of the potential of ‘e-health’, which should be supervised.
Pri usklajevanju zdravstvenega varstva imajo pomembno vlogo informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije, ki spodbujajo izmenjavo in souporabo dokumentov in podatkov, ne da bi vplivale na zahtevano zaupnost medicinskih podatkov.
Without affecting medical confidentiality, by facilitating the exchange and sharing of documents and data, information and communication technologies play an important role in healthcare coordination.
Obžalovanja vredno bi bilo, če bi prihodnji razvoj zakonodajalce Skupnosti presenetil in bi o pravnih posledicah ponovno odločalo Sodišče.
It would be regrettable if the EU legislator were to be caught unawares by future developments and the legal consequences were once again settled by the Court of Justice.
o civilno-vojaškem sodelovanju in razvoju civilno-vojaških zmogljivosti
on civilian-military cooperation and the development of civilian-military capabilities
– ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije z naslovom „Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu“, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 12. decembra 2003, in poročila o njenem izvajanju z naslovom „Zagotavljanje varnosti v spreminjajočem se svetu“, ki ga je Evropski svet podprl 11. in 12. decembra 2008,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy entitled 'A secure Europe in a better world', adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003, and to the report on its implementation entitled 'Providing security in a changing world', endorsed by the European Council on 11-12 December 2008,
­– ob upoštevanju strategije o notranji varnosti za Evropsko unijo, ki jo je Evropski svet podprl 25. in 26. marca 2010,
­– having regard to the Internal Security Strategy for the European Union, endorsed by the European Council on 25-26 March 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 26. aprila 2010 o skupni varnostni in obrambni politiki,
– having regard to the Council conclusions on CSDP adopted on 26 April 2010,
– ob upoštevanju zaključkov o evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki in izjave z naslovom „Deset let EVOP – izzivi in priložnosti“, ki jo je Svet sprejel 17. novembra 2009,
– having regard to the ESDP conclusions and the declaration entitled 'ESDP Ten Years – Challenges and Opportunities', adopted by the Council on 17 November 2009,
– ob upoštevanju izjave o okrepitvi EVOP, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 12. decembra 2008, in izjave o krepitvi zmogljivosti, ko jo je Svet sprejel 11. decembra 2008,
– having regard to the declaration on the enhancement of the European Security and Defence Policy, adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2008, and to the declaration on strengthening capabilities, adopted by the Council on 11 December 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva, ki jih je Evropski svet sprejel v Santi Marii de Feira 20. junija 2000 in v Göteborgu 16. junija 2001, programa EU za preprečevanje nasilnih konfliktov, ki je bil prav tako sprejet v Göteborgu 16. junija 2001, civilnega globalnega cilja 2008, ki ga je Evropski svet potrdil 17. decembra 2004, in civilnega globalnega cilja 2010, ki ga je Evropski svet potrdil 19. novembra 2007,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions adopted by the European Council at Santa Maria de Feira on 20 June 2000 and at Göteborg on 16 June 2001, to the EU Programme for the Prevention of Violent Conflicts also adopted at Göteborg on 16 June 2001, to the Civilian Headline Goal 2008, approved by the European Council on 17 December 2004, and to the Civilian Headline Goal 2010, approved by the Council on 19 November 2007,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva, ki jih je Evropski svet sprejel v Helsinkih 11. decembra 1999 (globalni cilj 2003), in globalnega cilja 2010, ki ga je Svet potrdil 17. maja 2004,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions adopted by the European Council at Helsinki on 11 December 1999 (Headline Goal 2003) and to the Headline Goal 2010, approved by the Council on 17 May 2004,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 30. novembra o krepitvi kemične, biološke, radiološke in jedrske (KBRJ) varnosti v Evropski uniji in odobritvi akcijskega načrta EU na področju KBRJ,
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 30 November 2009 on strengthening chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) security in the European Union and approving an EU CBRN Action Plan,
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta z naslovom „Izvajanje RVSZN 1325, okrepljene z RVSZN 1820, v okviru EVOP“ z dne 3. decembra 2008 in dokumenta Sveta z naslovom „Vključevanje človekovih pravic v EVOP“ z dne 14. septembra 2006,
– having regard to the Council paper 'Implementation of UNSCR 1325 as reinforced by UNSCR 1820 in the context of ESDP' of 3 December 2008, and to the Council document on 'Mainstreaming of Human Rights into ESDP' of 14 September 2006,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. februarja 2010 o nedavnem potresu na Haitiju, v kateri poziva k ustanovitvi enote civilne zaščite EU
– having regard to its resolution of 10 February 2010 on the recent earthquake in Haiti, which calls for the establishment of an EU Civil Protection Force
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0015 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0015 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2010 o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije ter skupne varnostne in obrambne politike
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2010 on the implementation of the European Security Strategy and the Common Security and Defence Policy
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0061 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0061 . ,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta o organizaciji in delovanju Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje
– having regard to the Council Decision of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0308/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0308/2010 ),
2. poudarja, da se notranja in zunanja varnost vse bolj prepletata in da EU z razvojem svojih politik in zmogljivosti za krizno upravljanje, preprečevanje konfliktov in izgradnjo miru v skladu z navedenimi cilji dejansko tudi pomaga zaščititi varnost svojih državljanov;
Points out that internal and external security are increasingly intertwined and that, by developing its crisis management , conflict prevention and peace-building policies and capabilities in line with the above objectives, the EU also helps to safeguard the security of its own citizens;
Krepitev civilno-vojaškega sodelovanja
Enhancing civilian-military coordination
8. zaradi razvoja celovitega pristopa EU spodbuja tudi tesno usklajevanje med ESZD in vsemi drugimi zadevnimi enotami Komisije, zlasti tistimi, ki se ukvarjajo z razvojem, humanitarno pomočjo, civilno zaščito in javnim zdravjem; poudarja potrebo po neposredni povezavi med ESZD in agencijami SVOP, in sicer Evropsko obrambno agencijo, Inštitutom EU za varnostne študije, Evropsko akademijo za varnost in obrambo ter Satelitskim centrom EU;
For the sake of the development of the EU's comprehensive approach, also encourages close coordination between the EEAS and all relevant units remaining within the Commission, in particular those dealing with development, humanitarian aid, civil protection and public health; stresses the need for direct links between the EEAS and CSDP agencies, namely the European Defence Agency, the EU Institute for Security Studies, the European Security and Defence College and the EU Satellite Centre;
11. poziva Svet, naj nemudoma sprejme potrebne sklepe za uveljavitev klavzule za vzajemno pomoč iz člena 42(7) PEU in solidarnostne klavzule iz člena 222 PDEU, ki bi odražali celostni pristop EU in gradili na civilno-vojaških virih;
Calls on the Council to promptly adopt the necessary decisions to give effect to the mutual assistance clause as outlined in Article 42(7) TEU as well as the solidarity clause as outlined in Article 222 TFEU, which should reflect the EU's comprehensive approach and build on civil-military resources;
Strateška raven
Strategic level
Operativna raven
Operational level