natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
59. je zaskrbljen zaradi možnosti koncesij za žita v okviru pogajanj z Ukrajino, saj je ukrajinska proizvodnja zelo konkurenčna, Ukrajina pa je že največji uporabnik kvot z znižanimi dajatvami za žita (pšenica in ječmen), namenjenih tretjim državam; poziva torej Komisijo, naj omeji svojo ponudbo v tem sektorju.
Is concerned at the prospect of concessions on cereals in the negotiations with Ukraine, in view of the fact that Ukrainian production is highly competitive and that Ukraine is already the main user of reduced-tariff cereal quotas (wheat and barley) offered to third countries; calls, therefore, on the Commission to limit its offer in this sector;
V času, ko EU razmišlja o prihodnosti svoje skupne kmetijske politike (SKP), postaja usklajenost kmetijske in zunanjetrgovinske politike vse bolj pomembna.
At a time when the EU is reflecting on the future of its Common Agricultural Policy, ensuring consistency between agricultural and external trade policy becomes all the more crucial.
SKP je simbol evropskega povezovanja in ena najbolj razvitih oblik nadnacionalnega odločanja v EU.
The CAP constitutes a symbol of European integration, representing one of the highest developed forms of EU supranational decision-making.
Do zaporednih reform SKP prihaja glede na različne notranje in zunanje pritiske.
The successive CAP reforms have taken place in the light of various internal and external pressures.
Večstranska pogajanja o trgovini in pravila Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) glede kmetijskih politik so glavna gonilna sila reforme SKP.
Multilateral trade negotiations and the WTO disciplines on agricultural policies have been a major driving force of CAP reform.
Notranji pritiski EU za tržno naravnanost SKP in večji poudarek na drugih politikah se prav tako odražajo v zunanjetrgovinski politiki EU, pri kateri je pogajalska strategija Komisije sledeča: odpiranje trga v zameno za boljši dostop do trga za evropske izdelke in storitve na trgih tretjih držav.
The internal EU pressures towards market orientation of the CAP and greater emphasis being placed on other European policies, are equally reflected in the EU’s external trade policy, where the Commission’s negotiating strategy consists of offering agricultural market opening in exchange for improved market access for European industrial products and services in third country markets.
Kmetijstvo in trgovina sta politiki, ki se križata.
Agriculture and trade are two intersecting policy agendas.
Dinamika obeh gospodarskih dejavnosti vpliva na regulativni okvir na večstranski, medregionalni, regionalni in dvostranski ravni, ta pa v veliki meri vpliva nanju.
The dynamics of both economic activities influence and, to a great extent, are influenced by regulatory settings at the multilateral, inter-regional, regional, and bilateral level.
Ta regulativni okvir ni statičen, ampak vzpostavlja hierarhična razmerja in se s pogajanji razvija.
These regulatory settings are not static; they create hierarchies and evolve through negotiations.
Različna pravila, različni trgovinski interesi, trgovinske napetosti in spori kažejo na zapletenost notranjih kmetijskih politik in mednarodne trgovine.
Regulative diversity, divergent commercial interests, trade tensions and disputes reflect the complexity of domestic agricultural policies and international trade.
Ker kmetijstvo ni zgolj gospodarska panoga, temveč naj bi se kmetijska in prehranska politika uporabljali za temeljne cilje, kot sta zanesljiva preskrba s hrano in varnost hrane, je glavni izziv učinkovito usklajevanje trgovinskih in netrgovinskih zadev.
Since agriculture is not simply an economic activity, but agricultural and food policies are to serve fundamental objectives, such as food security and safety, the principal challenge consists of effectively accommodating trade and non-trade concerns.
To usklajevanje, ki je odvisno od stopnje povezanosti sestavnih delov pravnega sistema (od najnižje – popolna različnost – prek vzajemnega priznavanja do poenotenosti), je manj zapleteno v okviru EU kot na večstranski ravni.
This accommodation, depending on the level of integration among constituent parts of a legal system (varying from, at the lowest level, complete diversity, through mutual recognition, to uniformity), poses fewer difficulties within the EU than at the multilateral level.
V STO negativno povezovanje z odpiranjem trga z odpravo trgovinskih ovir ni dovolj pospremljeno s pozitivnim povezovanjem s približevanjem regulative.
In the WTO, negative integration by way of market opening through dismantling of trade barriers, is not sufficiently accompanied by positive integration through regulatory convergence.
Vseeno lahko sporazum STO o uporabi sanitarnih in fitosanitarnih ukrepov in sporazum o tehničnih ovirah v trgovini štejemo za korak v smeri k novi regulativni filozofiji.
However, the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement) can be considered as a step towards a new regulatory philosophy.
Kmetijstvo je bilo v okvir STO vključeno s sporazumom o kmetijstvu v urugvajskem pogajalskem krogu, in sicer z dolgoročnim ciljem „oblikovati pravičen in tržno naravnan sistem kmetijske trgovine“ z „znatn[imi] progresivn[imi] zmanjšanj[i] kmetijske podpore in zaščite“, ki „pomenijo popravljanje in preprečevanje omejitev in izkrivljanja na svetovnih kmetijskih trgih“.
Agriculture was integrated in the WTO framework by the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (AoA), with the long-term objective to ‘establish a fair and market-oriented agricultural trading system’ through ‘substantial progressive reductions in agricultural support and protection’, ‘resulting in correcting and preventing restrictions and distortions in world agricultural markets’.
Velika težava kroga pogajanj iz Dohe o kmetijstvu je, da v njem sodelujejo skupine držav z zelo različnimi kmetijskimi modeli in interesi.
A major difficulty in the Doha Round agricultural negotiations is that they involve groups of countries with very different agricultural models and interests.
Netrgovinske zadeve EU in drugih članic z večfunkcionalnimi kmetijskimi modeli niso dovolj upoštevane.
The non-trade concerns of the EU and other Members with multifunctional agricultural models are not duly taken into account.
Med temi pogajanji je bila EU glede kmetijstva dolgo časa in je do določene mere še vedno v obrambni drži.
In the course of these negotiations, the EU has for a long time been -and to a certain extent still is- on the defensive as regards agriculture.
Vseeno je potrebnih nekaj opomb glede nekaterih napačnih predstav, ki ne upoštevajo dejstva, da se je SKP od svojega začetka zelo spremenila.
However, some observations need to be made in relation to certain misconceptions, which fail to take into account just how much the CAP has changed since its inception.
EU je največja uvoznica kmetijskih proizvodov iz držav v razvoju, uvaža namreč več kmetijskih dobrin kot ZDA, Japonska, Kanada, Avstralija in Nova Zelandija skupaj.
The EU is the world’s largest importer of farm products from developing countries, importing more agricultural goods than the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand combined.
Nenehen pritisk za nadaljnje odpiranje trga EU v glavnem izvajajo konkurenčni kmetijski izvozniki.
Ongoing pressure for further EU market opening comes mainly from competitive agricultural exporters.
Podelitev večjega dostopa do trga tem državam ne pomeni zgolj potencialno negativnih posledic zgolj za kmetijske pridelovalce EU, ampak tudi za tiste države v razvoju, ki trpijo največje pomanjkanje in katerih preferencialno razmerje se bo poslabšalo.
Granting enhanced market access to these countries not only has a potentially detrimental impact on EU agricultural producers, but also on those developing countries which are most in need, and whose preferential margin will be eroded.
Poleg tega je EU za razliko od drugih ključnih partnerjev bistveno zmanjšala svojo podporo, ki izkrivlja trgovino, in sicer z ločitvijo neposredne pomoči od proizvodnje ter s splošno usmeritvijo v posredovanje z varnostno mrežo, zaradi česar ima na voljo manj učinkovite instrumente za spoprijemanje s čedalje nestanovitnejšim trgom.
Moreover, the EU has, unlike other key partners, substantially reduced its trade-distorting support, through the decoupling of direct aids from production, and through a general move towards safety-net intervention, leaving it with less effective instruments to cope with increasing market volatility.
Prav tako je EU storila velik korak, ko je ponudila postopno ukinitev izvoznih subvencij – katerih obseg je že tako in tako močno zmanjšan – pod pogojem, da bi bile za druge oblike izvoznih spodbud, zlasti za izvozna posojila in jamstva (ki jih uporabljajo zlasti ZDA), državna podjetja za trgovino s kmetijskimi proizvodi (ki jih uporabljajo zlasti Avstralija, Nova Zelandija in Kanada) in pomoč v hrani (ki se množično uporablja v ZDA) uvedene enakovredne norme.
The EU has equally made a substantial offer to phase out its -already drastically reduced- export subsidies, provided that equivalent disciplines would be imposed on other forms of export incentives, and especially export credits and guarantees (used in particular by the US), agricultural state trading enterprises (used in particular by Australia, New Zealand and Canada), and food aid (used on a wide scale in the US).
V okviru STO EU nastopa v vlogi „obtoženke“ v pomembnih zadevah reševanja sporov, zlasti v zvezi z gensko spremenjenimi organizmi, geografskimi označbami, govedino s hormoni in klorirano perutnino.
In the WTO framework, the EU has also been a ‘defendant’ in major dispute settlement cases, namely the ‘GMOs’, the ‘Geographical Indications’, the ‘Beef Hormones’ and the ‘Chlorinated Poultry’ cases.
V zadevi v zvezi z govedino s hormoni je bilo kljub legitimnim pomislekom EU glede javnega zdravja in nediskriminatornosti njenega ukrepa odločeno, da med oceno tveganja in sredstvi za uresničitev tega cilja ni racionalne povezave.
In the ‘Beef Hormones’ case, despite the legitimacy of the EU public health concern, and the non-discriminatory nature of its measure, it was held that there was no rational relationship between the risk assessment and the means to achieve this purpose.
Zagovarja se mnenje, da je „sodni aktivizem“ „sodnih organov“ STO pri reševanju nekaterih sporov pomemben izziv za legitimnost STO z vidika demokracije.
It has been argued that the ‘judicial activism’ of the WTO ‘judicial organs’ in the settlement of certain disputes poses a profound challenge to the legitimacy of the WTO from the perspective of democracy.
Treba je opozoriti, da mehanizem reševanja sporov v STO na splošno velja za najpomembnejšo sistemsko rešitev urugvajskega kroga pogajanj in pomeni spremembo pravne paradigme, uvedeno z obvezno razsodbo in zavezujočimi izidi.
It should be noted that the dispute settlement mechanism of the WTO is widely considered as the most important systemic outcome of the Uruguay Round, marking a legal paradigm shift introduced by compulsory adjudication and binding outcomes.
Z ustanovitvijo STO se je povečal obseg regulativnih zadev, ki neposredno zadevajo notranje pravo in politike, poudarek pa ni več na ovirah „na meji“, ampak na ovirah „znotraj meje“.
The establishment of the WTO has broadened the scope of regulatory issues, which directly affect domestic law and policies, with focus being shifted from barriers that lie ‘at the border’ to barriers that exist ‘within the border’.
Ta premik pomeni izziv za manevrski prostor članic STO pri izvajanju zakonodajne oblasti in določanju standardov (javnega zdravja, varstva okolja, zanesljive preskrbe s hrano), ki lahko omejijo trgovino.
This shift challenges the scope for WTO Members to exercise legislative authority and set (public health, environmental protection, food security) standards, which are potentially trade restrictive.
V sporazumih STO so določeni cilji, ki jim lahko članice STO legitimno sledijo (npr. člen XX sporazumov GATT, sporazum o uporabi sanitarnih in fitosanitarnih ukrepov in sporazum o tehničnih ovirah v trgovini).
The WTO Agreements identify the objectives, which may be legitimately pursued by the WTO Members (e.g. Article XX of the GATT, the SPS and the TBT Agreements).
V skladu s sporazumom o uporabi sanitarnih in fitosanitarnih ukrepov se notranji standardi štejejo za skladne z STO, če temeljijo na mednarodnih standardih (kot je določeno npr. v Codex Alimentarius), medtem ko morajo biti standardi, ki so višji od mednarodne ravni, znanstveno upravičeni z oceno tveganja.
According to the SPS Agreement, domestic standards are presumed to be WTO compatible if they are based on international standards (as formulated e.g. in the Codex Alimentarius), while standards set higher than the international level need to be scientifically justified through a risk assessment.
Glede na brezizhodnost večstranskih pogajanj o trgovini se EU pogaja o dvostranskih in medregijskih sporazumih, ki dopolnjujejo večstranski okvir in ga ne nadomeščajo.
Given the impasse in the multilateral trade negotiations, the EU has pursued the negotiation of bilateral and interregional trade agreements, as complementary and not as a substitute to the multilateral framework.
Nekateri trdijo, da bodo trgovinski partnerji zaradi sklepanja takšnih sporazumov izgubili zanimanje za dogovor v STO, če bodo dobili želeni dostop na ciljnih trgih.
Some may argue that the conclusion of this type of agreements will make trading partners lose their interest in a WTO deal if they obtain the desired access in target markets.
Prav tako menijo, da je širjenje teh sporazumov tvegano, saj bo spodkopalo večstranski trgovinski sistem z vzpostavitvijo konkurenčnih trgovinskih blokov.
They also see a risk in the proliferation of these agreements that will undermine the multilateral trading system by creating competing trading blocks.
Drugi se ne strinjajo s tem, da ti sporazumi pomenijo priložnost – ki je sedanji okvir STO ne omogoča – za pogajanja o trajnostnem razvoju in drugih klavzulah ter pristanek na upoštevanje družbenih in okoljskih standardov.
Others may take issue with the fact that these agreements offer an opportunity, not currently available in the WTO framework, to negotiate sustainable development and other clauses and subject concessions to respect of social and environmental standards.
Dvostranskim sporazumom se morda daje prednost zgolj zato, ker so manj zapleteni in ker vlada prepričanje, da je interesom mogoče bolje ugoditi s selektivnim pristopom trgovinskih partnerjev.
Preference for bilateral agreements may simply be due to their less complex character and the belief that interests are better served through a selective approach of trading partners.
ZDA in EU zdaj med seboj „tekmujeta“ za to, kdo in pod kakšnimi pogoji bo prvi na novih ključnih trgih.
Currently, there is ‘competition’ between the US and the EU as to who will enter first -and under which conditions- key new markets.
Jasno je, da mora EU v okviru teh pogajanj zagotoviti bolj uravnotežen pristop med različnimi sektorji in spodbujati tako defenzivne kot ofenzivne evropske kmetijske interese.
There is a clear need for the EU, in the framework of these negotiations, to ensure a more balanced approach among different sectors and to promote both defensive and offensive European agricultural interests.
Usklajenost med SKP in zunanjetrgovinsko politiko EU bo zagotovila ohranitev evropskega kmetijskega modela ter enake konkurenčne pogoje za vse proizvajalce iz EU na svetovnem trgu.
Coherence between the CAP and the EU external trade policy shall ensure the preservation of the European agricultural model, as well as a level playing field for EU producers in the world market.
Večfunkcionalna vloga evropskega kmetijskega sektorja je lahko pobudnik novih paradigem, saj našim družbam zagotavlja zelo pomembne javne dobrine – preskrbe z njimi ni mogoče zagotoviti prek trga: zanesljiva preskrba s hrano, varnost hrane in njena kakovost po dostopnih cenah za državljane EU.
The multifunctional role of the European agricultural sector can serve as a catalyst for new paradigms, since it delivers public goods of major importance to our societies, whose supply cannot be secured through the market: food security, safety and quality at an affordable price for EU citizens.
Do svetovnega povečanja povpraševanja po hrani prihaja v času višjih stroškov proizvodnje, močne nestanovitnosti kmetijskih trgov, manj razpoložljivih površin, vode in energetskih virov.
There is a global increase in food demand against a background of higher production costs, severe volatility in agricultural markets, less land, less water and reduced energy inputs.
Močna SKP je pomembna tudi za ohranjanje, okoljsko trajnost in gospodarski razvoj podeželja EU glede na preteče opuščanje zemljišč in odseljevanje s podeželja.
A strong CAP is also fundamental for the preservation, environmental sustainability and economic development of the EU rural areas against the threat of land abandonment and rural depopulation.
Gospodarska geografija SKP je povezana z drugimi družbenimi in političnimi cilji.
The economic geography of the CAP is interlinked with other societal and policy objectives.
Evropski kmetijski sektor ima jasno dodano vrednost in pomembno vlogo v okviru strategije EU 2020 pri spopadanju z družbenimi, gospodarskimi in okoljskimi izzivi, s katerimi se EU sooča doma in kot vodilni svetovni akter.
The European agricultural sector has a clear added value and a major role to play in the ‘EU 2020’ strategy towards tackling the socio-economic and environmental challenges that EU is facing, both internally and as a leading global player.
Nasprotno, trgovinska in kmetijska politika lahko podpirata druga drugo in to tudi morata storiti.
To the contrary, trade policy and agricultural policy can and must be mutually supportive.
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino(*)
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade (*)
o kmetijstvu EU in mednarodni trgovini
on EU-Agriculture and International Trade
2. opozarja, da reforma skupne kmetijske politike leta 2003 in njen pregled leta 2008 z napovedjo verjetnega izida pogajalskega kroga iz Dohe kažeta na resnost zavez EU glede reform, medtem ko se od trgovinskih partnerjev EU še vedno pričakuje, da ravnajo enako;
Recalls that the 2003 CAP reform and the 2008 ‘Health Check’ have demonstrated the seriousness of the EU’s reform commitments by anticipating the likely results of the Doha round, while equivalent concessions are still expected from the EU’s trading partners;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj si za zaščito interesov potrošnikov z zagotavljanjem zanesljivih in pomembnih informacij o proizvodih še naprej prizadeva za učinkovitejšo zaščito geografskih označb v STO, in sicer z razširitvijo visoke stopnje zaščite, ki je zdaj na voljo za vina in žgane pijače (člen 23 sporazuma TRIPS), na vse geografske označbe in z vzpostavitvijo sistema za sporočanje in registracijo geografskih označb;
Calls upon the Commission to continue, in order to safeguard consumer interests by providing consumers with reliable and relevant product information, to seek more effective protection of geographical indications (GI) in the WTO by extending the higher level of protection currently available for wines and spirits (Article 23 of the TRIPS agreement) to all GIs, and by establishing a system of notification and registration of geographical indications;
10. poudarja, da morajo vsi domači ali uvoženi izdelki, ki se tržijo v EU, še naprej izpolnjevati iste stroge zahteve glede varnosti hrane; v primeru standardov o dobrem počutju živali in okoljskih standardov poziva Komisijo, naj stori vse, da bo spodbudila doseganje skupnega dogovora s tretjimi državami v primerih, ko standardi presegajo mednarodna priporočila, tudi z dodajanjem določb o sprejetju in izvajanju mednarodnih standardov v dvostranske trgovinske sporazume;
Emphasises that all products marketed within the EU, domestic or imported, must continue to comply with the same stringent food safety requirements; in the case of animal welfare and environmental standards, calls on the Commission to do all it can to promote common understanding with third countries where standards go beyond international recommendations, as well as including provisions for adoption and enforcement of international standards in its bilateral trade agreements;
12. poudarja pomen doslednega izvajanja preferencialnih pravil o poreklu; poziva k pregledu vseh trgovinskih preferencialov, ki jih je Evropska unija dodelila državam v vzponu, ki so članice skupine G-20;
Emphasises the importance of strict implementation of the preferential rules of origin; calls for a review of all trade preferences given to emerging countries which are members of the G-20 by the European Union;
15. je zaskrbljen zaradi možnosti koncesij za žita v okviru pogajanj z Ukrajino, saj je ukrajinska proizvodnja zelo konkurenčna, Ukrajina pa je že največji uporabnik kvot z znižanimi dajatvami za žita (pšenica in ječmen), namenjenih tretjim državam; zato poziva Komisijo, naj omeji svojo ponudbo v tem sektorju.
Is concerned at the prospect of concessions on cereals in the negotiations with Ukraine, in view of the fact that Ukrainian production is highly competitive and that Ukraine is already the main user of reduced-tariff cereal quotas (wheat and barley) offered to third countries; calls, therefore, on the Commission to limit its offer in this sector.
William (grof) Dartmouthski (William (The Earl of) Dartmouth), Laima Liucija Andrikienė, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Harlem Désir, Christofer Fjellner, Joe Higgins, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Vital Moreira, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Tokia Saïfi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Keith Taylor, Paweł Zalewski
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Harlem Désir, Christofer Fjellner, Joe Higgins, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Vital Moreira, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Tokia Saïfi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Keith Taylor, Paweł Zalewski
8. poziva, naj se med razpravami o SKP po letu 2013 sprejme bolj globalna perspektiva, ki bo razširila možnosti dostopa do trga za države v razvoju in jim omogočila, da konkurenčno delujejo na svojih nacionalnih in regionalnih trgih;
Urges that a more global perspective be adopted in the discussions on the CAP post-2013, expanding market-access opportunities for developing countries and allowing them to perform competitively in their own national and regional markets;
Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Nirj Deva, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Nirj Deva, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Theocharous, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer