natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ob upoštevanju institucionalnega okvira posameznih držav članic, razdelitve pristojnosti in načela subsidiarnosti lahko evropske institucije spodbujajo proces izboljšanja upravljanja na vseh ravneh: na ravni Skupnosti ter na državni, regionalni in lokalni ravni.
Whilst taking due account of the institutional framework of each Member State, the allocation of powers and the subsidiarity principle, the European institutions can provide the impetus needed to improve governance at all levels: Community, national, regional and local.
Pobude Skupnosti, kot sta URBAN I in II za mesta ter LEADER za podeželje, so pokazale učinkovitost metod, na podlagi katerih delujejo.
Community initiatives, such as URBAN I and II in urban areas and LEADER in rural areas, have shown that their methodology works.
Te metode med drugim zajemajo celovit večsektorski in teritorialni pristop od spodaj navzgor.
That methodology is based, for example, on a multi-sectoral, territorial and bottom-up integrated approach.
Izboljšanje upravljanja: od zasnove do praktičnega izvajanja
Improving governance: from concept to practical application
V evropski zakonodaji je čedalje bolj razširjen koncept o celovitem pristopu, tj. nadaljnjem vključevanju vseh področij politike, ki vplivajo na območja, gospodarstvo in družbo.
The concept of the integrated approach, i.e. the more detailed coordination of all policies which have a territorial, economic and social impact, is becoming more and more prevalent in European legislation.
Ta koncept izhaja iz potrebe po odstranitvi političnih in upravnih meja
That concept was born of the need to decompartmentalise political and administrative structures.
Postala je vodilna misel pri izboljševanju učinkovitosti evropskih politik.
It has become a leitmotif when ways of making European policies more effective are discussed.
Tovrsten pristop pomeni, da je treba v nekem projektu upoštevati različna vprašanja, ki so z njim povezana, upravljanje pa je način, kako to izvesti.
If the integrated approach reflects the need to take account of all the different aspects of a single project, governance is the mechanism which makes that integrated approach possible.
Cilj tega poročila je predstaviti vrsto konkretnih predlogov, s katerimi bi se lahko sistemi upravljanja izboljšali.
The aim of this report is to put forward a series of practical proposals concerning ways of improving governance systems.
Poseben poudarek je na izvajanju načela partnerstva, ki je bistveni element kohezijske politike na področju upravljanja.
Particular emphasis is placed on the application of the partnership principle, a key component of cohesion policy in the area of governance.
Zato mora biti zasnova različnih skladov povezana in se mora med seboj dopolnjevati.
The architecture of the various funds must therefore be coherent and complementary.
Načelo partnerstva je bistveno in posebno načelo upravljanja strukturnih skladov.
A key principle specific to the governance of the Structural Funds is the partnership principle, which has made for more transparent, more open and more integrated governance of cohesion policy.
Na podlagi tega načela je upravljanje kohezijske politike postalo bolj pregledno, odprto in celovito, vendar je njegovo izvajanje v precejšnji meri še vedno nezadostno.
However, it is not yet applied anything like as widely as it should be.
V uspešno partnerstvo je na začetku procesa potrebno nekaj vložiti, v nadaljevanju pa z njim pridobimo pri času, denarju in učinkovitosti.
A successful partnership requires some investment at the start of the process, but subsequently generates savings of time and money and increased effectiveness.
Komisija mora ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti in institucionalnega okvira posameznih držav članic preučiti izvajanje načela partnerstva v različnih državah članicah in njihovih regijah.
Taking due account of the subsidiarity principle and the institutional framework of each Member State, the Commission must analyse the way the partnership principle is applied in the Member States and their regions.
V skladu s tem bi bilo treba pripraviti smernice, zlasti za spodbujanje in razširjanje dobre prakse.
On the basis of that analysis, a guide should be drawn up, in particular with a view to promoting and disseminating best practices.
Poleg tega je treba prek usposabljanja okrepiti zmogljivosti partnerjev, da bi v celoti sodelovali v partnerstvu.
In addition, training measures are needed to strengthen the partners’ capabilities and enable them to participate fully in the governance process.
Pomemben element načela partnerstva je vključenost državljanov.
The involvement of ordinary members of the public is a key element of the partnership principle.
Večstopenjsko upravljanje
Multi-level governance
Večstopenjsko upravljanje pomeni, da imajo politični organi na vseh ravneh – na ravni Skupnosti, držav, regij ali lokalnih skupnosti – pristojnosti in zmogljivosti, da lahko prispevajo k izvajanju kohezijske politike.
Multi-level governance implies that each political level – Community, national, regional or local – should have the powers and capabilities to contribute to the implementation of cohesion policy.
Uporaba načela subsidiarnosti zahteva določeno stopnjo decentralizacije kohezijske politike.
The application of the subsidiarity principle calls for cohesion policy to be decentralised to some degree.
Vsi udeleženci v procesu izvajanja kohezijske politike morajo v okviru posameznih upravnih in institucionalnih ureditev med seboj tesno sodelovati.
All the bodies and individuals involved in implementing cohesion policy must cooperate closely in a broader context of separate administrative and institutional structures.
Uspeh oziroma neuspeh sodelovanja vseh udeleženih akterjev ni pogojen z institucionalnim sistemom, saj je mogoče v enem in istem sistemu pri izvajanju projektov doseči tako dobre kot slabe rezultate.
The institutional system is largely irrelevant to the success or failure of cooperation among all the bodies and individuals involved: the same system may equally well produce good or bad results in terms of the implementation of projects.
Pomembno je, da se opravi več raziskav na področju dejavnikov uspešnosti in neuspešnosti, in sicer neodvisno od institucionalne ureditve držav članic.
What is needed is more detailed research into the factors behind those good or bad results, irrespective of the institutional structure of the Member State concerned.
V tem smislu bo treba v akcijski program izvajanja teritorialne agende ali novi program ORATE vključiti elemente upravljanja.
In that connection, the Action Programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda and the new ESPON programme will have to incorporate aspects relating to governance.
Teritorialna razsežnost je čedalje bolj v osrčju kohezijske politike.
The territorial dimension is increasingly central to cohesion policy.
V lizbonski pogodbi je poleg ekonomske in socialne kohezije kot cilj Evropske unije opredeljena tudi teritorialna kohezija.
The Lisbon Treaty makes territorial cohesion a European Union objective on the same basis as economic and social cohesion.
Evropska komisija bo jeseni objavila zeleno knjigo o teritorialni koheziji, pri čemer bo treba posebno pozornost nameniti vprašanju upravljanja.
This coming autumn, the European Commission will publish its Green Paper on territorial cohesion and, in that connection, particular attention will have to be paid to the issue of governance.
Z vključitvijo teritorialne razsežnosti v kohezijsko politiko bo potreben tudi razmislek o ustrezni ravni vključitve na teritorialni ravni.
Integrating the territorial dimension into cohesion policy also entails considering the appropriate territorial level at which intervention should take place.
Pri tem velja preučiti nove pojme, kot je gravitacijsko območje.
Emerging concepts, such as those of population and labour catchment areas, merit study.
Evropsko združenje za teritorialno sodelovanje je odličen instrument za vzpostavitev učinkovitega čezmejnega in nadnacionalnega upravljanja, vendar se tega instrumenta zaenkrat še ne uporablja in izrablja zadosti, bodisi zato, ker države članice niso ustrezno prilagodile svoje zakonodaje, bodisi zaradi pomanjkanja resnične politične volje.
The European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation is an excellent instrument for establishing effective cross-border and transnational governance, but as yet sufficient use is not being made of it, either as a result of a failure to make the necessary changes to the laws of the Member States or, possibly, a lack of genuine political will.
Tudi institucije Skupnosti se morajo ustrezno prilagoditi, da bi delovale učinkoviteje na podlagi uporabe načel celovitega pristopa.
The Community institutions themselves must revise their current organisational arrangements with a view to implementing the principles underpinning the integrated approach more effectively.
Zaradi sedanje razdeljenosti znotraj Evropskega parlamenta na različne parlamentarne odbore ter znotraj Evropske komisije na generalne direktorate se ni mogoče učinkovito odzivati na številna vprašanja, ki zadevajo več področij politike.
The current divisions in the European Parliament between specific parliamentary committees and in the European Commission between directorates-general makes the work of producing the right response to many horizontal issues very difficult.
Tako so na primer vprašanja v zvezi z javnim prevozom povezana z onesnaževanjem, odpravo socialnih ovir med regijami, urbanizmom itd., za ta področja pa so pristojni različni parlamentarni odbori in generalni direktorati.
For example, public transport issues have an impact on pollution, the full integration of territories into society, urban planning, etc., so that they fall into the areas of responsibility of several parliamentary committees and several directorates-general.
Poleg tega mora Svet glede na pomembni delež sredstev, namenjenih strukturnim skladom (36 % proračuna EU), temu področju nameniti še posebno pozornost.
Moreover, the size of the budgets earmarked for the Structural Funds (36% of the EU budget) warrants close monitoring at Council level.
Orodja za spodbujanje učinkovitega upravljanja
Tools to promote successful governance
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega upravljanja je treba uporabiti orodje projektnega vodenja.
Project management, which is based on simple rules, is the tool needed to put the principles of governance into practice.
Je sredstvo za organizacijo medsebojnega vpliva različnih akterjev, ki omogoča delovanje celostnega pristopa.
It is a tool which can be used to structure the interaction between the various actors involved in a process, i.e. to put the integrated approach into practice.
Uporabo novih metod upravljanja, kot je projektno vodenje, je treba tudi spodbujati in jih razširjati.
In addition, new governance methods, such as project management, must be promoted and disseminated.
Zato bo treba sprožiti postopek vseživljenjskega učenja, ki bo namenjen različnim udeležencem, predvsem izvoljenim predstavnikom ter državnim, regionalnim in lokalnim uslužbencem.
A process of continuous learning must therefore be started, aimed at all the individuals involved, in particular elected representatives and national, regional and local civil servants.
Poleg tega je treba preučiti tudi možnost ustanovitve programa ERASMUS za izvoljene lokalne predstavnike, ki bi prispeval k izmenjavi dobrih praks na področju upravljanja.
In addition, the creation of an ERASMUS programme for local elected representatives represents one possible way of contributing to exchanges of good practice in the area of governance.
Končno bi morale evropske tematske mreže razširiti svoje delovanje na področju upravljanja in s tem izboljšati njihovo učinkovitost.
Finally, the European thematic networks should broaden the scope of their work in the area of governance with a view to making it more effective.
Upravljanje, zlasti načelo partnerstva, je danes priznan ključni dejavnik, ki vpliva na učinkovitost uporabe strukturnih skladov.
Governance, and in particular the partnership principle, is now acknowledged as a vital factor in determining the effectiveness of the Structural Funds.
Na to temo je bilo izdelanih več konceptov, ki pa pogosto niso zelo učinkoviti in se v praksi ne uporabljajo.
Many governance concepts have been developed, but too often they are unworkable and overly theoretical.
Evropska unija se je že izkazala kot odlična preobrazbena sila na področju upravljanja.
The European Union has already shown that it can be a major force in transforming governance.
Če bo te predloge uporabila v praksi, bo lahko uporabila svoje preobrazbene zmogljivosti ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti ter s tem spodbujala trajnostni razvoj regij.
By putting these proposals into practice, it can use its transforming power in a manner consistent with the subsidiarity principle and move the process of securing sustainable development for territories forward.
Odbor za proračunski nadzor poziva Odbor za regionalni razvoj kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgetary Control calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
1. poudarja, da so bile strukturne politike drugi največji del proračuna EU v programskem obdobju 2000–2006 in so glavne politike EU v obdobju 2007–2013;
1. underlines that structural policies were the second largest part of the EU budget in the programming period 2000-2006 and are the major policies of the EU in the 2007-2013 period;
2. opozarja, da je Evropsko računsko sodišče v svojem letnem poročilu o finančnem letu 2006 ugotovilo, da vsaj 12 % skupnega zneska, povrnjenega projektom strukturnih politik, ne bi smelo biti povrnjenih in da je 44 % povračil v vzorcu vsebovalo napake, pri čemer je znaten delež projektov vseboval napake v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem obveznosti;
2. recalls that in its Annual Report concerning the financial year 2006, the European Court of Auditors found that at least 12% of the total amount reimbursed to Structural Policies projects should not have been reimbursed, that 44% of the reimbursements in the sample were affected by errors and that a significant percentage projects were subject to compliance errors;
3. poudarja, da je Evropsko računsko sodišče v istem poročilu nadzorne sisteme držav članic opisalo kot splošno neučinkovite ali le zmerno učinkovite;
3. stresses that in the same report, the European Court of Auditors described the control systems in the Member States as generally ineffective or only moderately effective;
4. zato pozdravlja prizadevanje za uresničevanje ciljev strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov med tekočim programskim obdobjem 2007–2013 v okviru vodenja in načela partnerstva
4. welcomes therefore the effort to pursue the objectives of the structural and cohesion funds during the current 2007-2013 programming period in the framework of governance and the partnership principle
5. poziva nacionalna računska sodišča, da prevzamejo pomembnejšo in dejavnejšo vlogo pri nadzornih mehanizmih, zagotovijo primerno porabo sredstev ter sprejmejo svoje obveznosti;
5. calls for the national courts of auditors both to play a stronger role in the control mechanisms, to ensure that funds are appropriately spent, and to accept their responsibilities and play a more active part;
6. poziva države članice, da zagotovijo usmerjanje in usposabljanje pobudnikov projektov, organov upravljanja in plačilnih ter revizijskih organov, s čimer bi se vsi akterji dobro zavedali zahtev uredb Skupnosti in jih ustrezno izvajali;
6. calls for the provision of guidance and training by the Member States for the project promoters and the managing and paying authorities as well as for the audit bodies to ensure that all actors are well aware of and properly implement Community regulation requirements;
7. pozdravlja letne povzetke držav članic kot prvi korak k izjavam o državnem upravljanju; vendar poziva Komisijo, da predlaga sprejetje enakih zahtev, smernic in napotkov za strukturne politike in skupno kmetijsko politiko;
7. welcomes the annual summaries of Member States as a first step towards National Management Declarations; urges however the Commission to propose the adoption of the same requirements, guidelines and guidance notes for Structural Policies as for the Common Agricultural Policy;
8. obžaluje, da so bile izvedbene določbe za projekte spet sprejete zelo pozno, in poziva pristojne upravne organe ter plačilne in nadzorne organe, naj zagotovijo in uporabijo pravila za poenostavitev upravnih postopkov (npr. s pogostejšo uporabo pavšalov);
8. regrets the fact that the implementing provisions for the projects were once again adopted very late and calls on the responsible managing authorities, and payment and control authorities to provide for and implement rules designed to simplify administration (e.g. by making more use of flat-rate payments).
o izvajanju socialne zakonodaje v cestnem prometu
on the implementation of social legislation relating to road transport
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ................................10
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o posledicah izvzetja samozaposlenih voznikov s področja uporabe Direktive 2002/15/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2002 o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu ( KOM(2007)0266 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the consequences of the exclusion of self-employed drivers from the scope of Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities ( COM(2007)0266 ),
- ob upoštevanju 23. poročila Komisije o izvajanju Uredbe (EGS) št. 3820/85 o usklajevanju določene socialne zakonodaje v zvezi s cestnim prometom v obdobju 2003–2004 ( KOM(2007)0622 ),
- having regard to the 23rd report of the Commission on the implementation in 2003-2004 of Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport ( COM(2007)0622 ),
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3820/85 z dne 20. decembra 1985 o usklajevanju določene socialne zakonodaje v zvezi s cestnim prometom
- having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport
UL L 370, 31.12.85, str.
OJ L 370, 31.12.1985, p.
- ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/15/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2002 o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu
- having regard to Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities
UL L 80, 23.3.2002, str.
OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p.35. ,
UL L 102, 11.04.2006, str.
OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p.
- ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o minimalnih pogojih za izvajanje uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 3820/85 in (EGS) št. 3821/85 o socialni zakonodaji v zvezi z dejavnostmi v cestnem prometu in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 88/599/EGS
- having regard to Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC
- ob upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča Evropskih Skupnosti z dne 24. septembra 2004 v zadevah C-184/02 in C-223/02: Kraljevina Španija in Republika Finska proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu Evropske unije
- having regard to the judgment of 24 September 2004 in Joined Cases C-184/02 and C-223/02 K ingdom of Spain and Republic of Finland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union
ECR [2004] I-7789. , v katerih je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti odločilo, da samozaposlenih voznikov ni mogoče za stalno izključiti iz področja delovanja direktive 2002/15/ES,
ECR [2004] I-7789. , in which the Court of Justice of the European Communities ruled that self-employed drivers could not be excluded permanently from the scope of Directive 2002/15/EC,
- ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom „Naj Evropa ostane v gibanju – Trajnostna mobilnost za našo celino – Vmesni pregled Bele knjige Evropske komisije o prometu iz leta 2001“
- having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament entitled Keep Europe moving – sustainable mobility for our continent – mid-term review of the European Commission’s 2001 transport White Paper
UL C 161, 13.07.2007, str.
OJ C 161, 13.7.2007, p.
- ob upoštevanju pisem predsednika Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve komisarju Vladimirju Spidli (21. junija 2007) in podpredsedniku Komisije Jacquesu Barrotu ter odgovora podpredsednika Barrota z dne 3. oktobra 2007,
- having regard to the letters of 21 June 2007 and 29 June 2007 from the Chairman of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs to Commissioner Vladimir Spidla and Vice-President Jacques Barrot and the reply from Vice-President Barrot of 3 October 2007,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Evropske fundacije za izboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih razmer z naslovom „Vpliv direktive o delovnem času na pogajanja o kolektivnih pogodbah oseb v cestnoprometnem sektorju“
- having regard to the report of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions entitled Impact of the working time directive on collective bargaining in the road transport sector
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0357/2008 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0357/2008 ),
A. ker nekatere države članice niso pravočasno posredovale informacij o nadzorni in izvajalski dejavnosti v obdobju 2003–2004, zahtevanih v skladu z uredbo (EGS) št. 3820/85, zaradi česar je bilo poročilo Komisije o izvajanju te uredbe v zadevnem obdobju ( KOM(2007)0622 ) predstavljeno z enoinpolletno zamudo,
A. whereas some Member States failed to supply within the time limits the information on inspection and enforcement activities in 2003-2004 required under Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85, with the result that the Commission’s report on the implementation of that Regulation during the period in question ( COM(2007)0622 )) was submitted one and a half years late,
B. ker je povprečno število ugotovljenih kršitev ostalo stabilno, deloma je naraslo le skupno število evidentiranih kršitev v nekaterih državah članicah, pri čemer se je povečalo število kršitev proti odmoru in času počitka na splošno, število kršitev predpisov glede časa vožnje pa so se zmanjšale;
B. whereas the average number of contraventions detected has remained stable, although the total number of contraventions reported in some Member States rose considerably, with breaches of the rules on breaks and rest periods tending to increase while breaches of the rules on driving times fell,
C. ker bo naslednje dvoletno poročilo moralo prvič vsebovati informacije o izvajanju direktive 2002/15/ES,
C. whereas the next biennial report will have to include, for the first time, information on the implementation of Directive 2002/15/EC,
D. ker je v splošnem interesu, da se pravila o delovnem času ter trajanju voženj in počitka za mobilne delavce, pa tudi za samozaposlene voznike, uporabljajo pravilno,
D. whereas it is in the general interest that the rules on working time, driving times and rest periods for both mobile workers and self-employed drivers should be properly applied,