natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta določba se uporablja le za področje delovanja sprejetega ukrepa brez odvzema prostosti in v nobenem primeru sprememba obveznosti ne sme posegati v ponovno presojo evropskega naloga za nadzor v skladu s členom 13 tega okvirnega sklepa.
This provision shall only apply to the scope of the non-custodial measure adopted and in no case may any modification of the obligations in question prejudice the review of the European supervision order pursuant to Article 13 of this Framework Decision.
Člen 6, odstavek 4a (novo)
Article 6, paragraph 4a (new)
Države članice lahko tudi sklenejo, da bodo uporabile določbe tega člena za predsodni preiskovalni postopek.
Member States may also decide to apply the provisions of this Article to the pre-trial investigation process.
Sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec v zaprošeni državi zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor, če je razvidno, da bi kazenski postopek za dejanje, v zvezi s katerim je bil nalog izdan, kršil načelo ne bis in idem .
A court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor , in the requested State shall refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order if it is clear that criminal proceedings for the offence in respect of which that order has been issued would infringe the ne bis in idem principle .
Sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec v zaprošeni državi zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor, če razmere med državami članicami ustrezajo pogojem, določenim v členih 3 in 4 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami 1 .
A court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor in the requested State shall refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order where the situation existing between the Member States corresponds to one of the cases referred to in Articles 3 and 4 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States 1 .
Sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec v zaprošeni državi lahko zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor iz enega ali več naslednjih razlogov :
A court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor , in the requested State may refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order on one or more of the following grounds :
Odstavek 1 velja zlasti :
Paragraph 1 shall apply in particular :
(a) če v skladu z zakonodajo zaprošene države osumljenec zaradi svoje starosti ne more biti kazensko odgovoren za dejanja, v zvezi s katerimi je bil izdan evropski nalog za nadzor;
(a) if, under the law of the requested State, the suspect may not, owing to his age, be held criminally responsible for the acts on which the European supervision order is based;
(a) če v skladu z zakonodajo zaprošene države osumljenec zaradi svoje starosti ne more biti kazensko odgovoren za dejanja ali opustitve , v zvezi s katerimi je bil izdan evropski nalog za nadzor;
(a) if, under the law of the requested State, the suspect may not, owing to his age, be held criminally responsible for the acts or omissions on which the European supervision order is based;
(b) če obstaja imuniteta ali privilegij v skladu z zakonodajo zaprošene države, ki preprečuje izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor;
(b) if there is an immunity or privilege under the law of the requested State which would prevent the execution of the European supervision order;
(c) če je dejanje, na katero se nanaša evropski nalog za nadzor, zajeto v pomilostitev v zaprošeni državi, pri čemer je ta država imela sodno pristojnost za pregon dejanja v skladu s svojim kazenskim pravom.
(c) if the offence to which the European supervision order relates is covered by an amnesty in the requested State, where that State had jurisdiction to prosecute the offence under its own criminal law.
(b) če dejanje, v zvezi s katerim je bil izdan evropski nalog za nadzor, ni kaznivo dejanje po pravu države članice izvršitve; vendar se v povezavi z davki ali dajatvami, carino in deviznim poslovanjem izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor ne zavrne z razlogom, da zakonodaja države izvršitve ne odmerja enakih davkov ali dajatev ali da ne vsebuje enakih pravil glede davkov, dajatev ter carinskih in deviznih predpisov kot zakonodaja države članice izdaje.
(b) if the act on which the European supervision order is based does not constitute an offence under the law of the executing Member State; however, in relation to taxes or duties, customs and exchange, execution of the European supervision order shall not be refused on the ground that the law of the executing Member State does not impose the same kind of tax or duty or does not contain the same type of rules as regards taxes, duties and customs and exchange regulations as the law of the issuing Member State.
1 UL L 190, 18.7.2002, str.
1 OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p.
V primeru kršitve evropskega naloga za nadzor lahko organ izdaje v skladu z zakonodajo države izdaje sprejme odločitev:
In the event of a breach of the European supervision order, the issuing authority may, in accordance with the law of the issuing State, take the decision:
(a) da prekliče evropski nalog za nadzor;
(a) to revoke the European supervision order;
(b) da spremeni ali prekliče eno ali več obveznosti, vsebovanih v evropskem nalogu za nadzor;
(b) to amend or revoke one or more of the obligations contained in the European supervision order;
(c) da aretira in privede osumljenca, če je bil evropski nalog za nadzor izdan v zvezi z dejanjem, za katero zakonodaja države izdaje predvideva preiskovalni pripor pred sojenjem, zlasti če je to nujno, da se zagotovi navzočnost osumljenca na predhodnem zaslišanju ali sodni obravnavi;
(c) to arrest and transfer the suspect, if the European supervision order was issued in respect of an offence for which pre-trial detention is justified under the law of the issuing State, in particular when it is necessary in order to attend a preliminary hearing or trial;
(c) da aretira osumljenca, če je bil evropski nalog za nadzor izdan v zvezi z dejanjem, za katero zakonodaja države izdaje predvideva preiskovalni pripor pred sojenjem, zlasti:
(c) to arrest the suspect, if the European supervision order was issued in respect of an offence for which pre-trial detention is justified under the law of the issuing State, in particular:
(d) da aretira in privede osumljenca, in sicer v naslednjih okoliščinah :
(d) to arrest and transfer the suspect, in the following circumstances :
(i) če je bil evropski nalog za nadzor izdan v zvezi z dejanjem, za katero zakonodaja države izdaje ne predvideva preiskovalnega pripora pred sojenjem; in
(i) if the European supervision order was issued in respect of an offence for which pre-trial detention was initially not justified under the law of the issuing State; and
(i) če je bil evropski nalog za nadzor izdan v zvezi z dejanjem, za katero po zakonodaji države izdaje preiskovalni pripor pred sojenjem najprej ni bil upravičen ; in
(i) if the European supervision order was issued in respect of an offence for which pre-trial detention was initially not justified under the law of the issuing State; and
(ii) če evropski nalog za nadzor vsebuje omejitve svoboščin osumljenca v obsegu, primerljivem z odvzemom prostosti; in
(ii) if the European supervision order contains limitations of his freedoms of a degree comparable to deprivation of liberty; and
(iii) če sta aretacija in privedba nujna za zagotovitev navzočnosti osumljenca na predhodnem zaslišanju ali sodni obravnavi.
(iii) if the arrest and transfer is necessary to attend a preliminary hearing or trial.
(iii) če je aretacija nujna za zagotovitev navzočnosti osumljenca na predhodnem zaslišanju ali sodni obravnavi.
(iii) if the arrest is necessary to attend a preliminary hearing or trial.
Pred odločanjem o aretaciji in privedbi osumljenca organ izdaje upošteva vse zadevne okoliščine, vključno s predvideno kaznijo, posledicami kršitve in zlasti pripravljenostjo osumljenca, da se prostovoljno vrne v državo izdaje.
Before deciding on arrest and transfer , the issuing authority shall consider all relevant circumstances, including the specific penalty envisaged, the consequences of the breach and, in particular, the willingness of the suspect to come back voluntarily to the issuing State.
Pred odločanjem o aretaciji osumljenca organ izdaje upošteva vse zadevne okoliščine, vključno s predvideno kaznijo, posledicami kršitve in zlasti pripravljenostjo osumljenca, da se prostovoljno vrne v državo izdaje.
Before deciding on arrest, the issuing authority shall consider all relevant circumstances, including the specific penalty envisaged, the consequences of the breach and, in particular, the willingness of the suspect to come back voluntarily to the issuing State.
Če organ izdaje odloči, da se osumljenec aretira in privede, pri čemer je osumljenec v času sprejetja odločitve na ozemlju druge države članice, slednja aretira in privede osumljenca v skladu s pogoji iz člena 18.
If the issuing authority decides that the suspect must be arrested and transferred and, at the time of that decision, the suspect is in the territory of another Member State , that State shall arrest and transfer the suspect under the conditions of article 18.
Tej zahtevi se lahko ugodi z uporabo ustreznih video ali telefonskih povezav med organom izvršitve in organom izdaje (zaslišanje prek video- ali telefonske konference).
This requirement may be satisfied through the use of appropriate video or telephone links between the executing and the issuing authority (hearing by video or telephone conference).
Pogoji za aretacijo osumljenca
Conditions for arrest of the suspect
Če organ izdaje odloči, da se osumljenec aretira in privede v državo izdaje , osumljenca zasliši pravosodni organ države članice, na ozemlju katere je bil aretiran.
If the issuing authority decides that the suspect must be arrested and transferred to the issuing State , the suspect shall be heard by a judicial authority of the Member State on whose territory he is arrested.
Če organ izdaje odloči, da se osumljenec aretira, osumljenca zasliši pravosodni organ države članice, na ozemlju katere je bil aretiran.
If the issuing authority decides that the suspect must be arrested, the suspect shall be heard by a judicial authority of the Member State on whose territory he is arrested.
Če osumljenec privoli v svojo privedbo, država članica, na ozemlju katere je bil osumljenec aretiran, takoj privede osumljenca v državo izdaje.
If the suspect consents to his transfer the Member State on whose territory the suspect is arrested shall forthwith transfer him to the issuing State.
Država članica, na ozemlju katere je bil osumljenec aretiran, lahko aretacijo in privedbo zavrne samo :
The Member State on whose territory the suspect is arrested may refuse the arrest and transfer only :
– če je jasno, da bi kazenski postopek za dejanje, v zvezi s katerim je bil izdan nalog, prekršil načelo ne bis in idem;
– if it is clear that criminal proceedings for the offence in respect of which that order has been issued would meanwhile infringe the ne bis in idem principle;
– če je osumljenec preganjan v državi članici izvršitve zaradi dejstev, ki so ista kot dejstva, na katerih temelji evropski nalog za nadzor;
– if the suspect is being prosecuted in the executing Member State for the same facts as those on which the European supervision order is based;
– če sta kazenski pregon ali kaznovanje osumljenca zastarela v skladu z zakonodajo države članice izvršitve, dejanja pa spadajo pod sodno pristojnost navedene države članice v skladu z njenim kazenskim pravom;
– if the criminal prosecution or punishment of the suspect is statute-barred according to the law of the executing Member State and the acts fall within the jurisdiction of that Member State under its own criminal law;
– čer se odločitev o aretaciji in privedbi nanaša na nova dejstva, ki niso zajeta v evropskem nalogu za nadzor.
– if the decision to arrest and transfer concerns new facts not covered by the European supervision order.
– če se odločitev o aretaciji nanaša na nova dejstva, ki niso zajeta v evropskem nalogu za nadzor.
– if the decision to arrest concerns new facts not covered by the European supervision order.
Država članica, ki ni država izvršitve, lahko tudi zavrne aretacijo osumljenca na podlagi enega ali več razlogov, določenih v členu 10.
A Member State other than the executing State may also refuse to arrest the suspect on the basis of one or more of the grounds set out in Article 10.
Roki za privedbo
Time limits for transfer
Zgornja določba velja tudi v primerih, kjer je bilo z nalogom o nadzoru v skladu s členom 6(2)(d) osumljencu prepovedano zapustiti kraj stalnega bivališča ali drug kraj za celotno obdobje, določeno v nalogu.
The above provision shall also apply where, for the purposes of Article 6(2)(d), the suspect has been forbidden under the supervision order to leave his place of residence or any other dwelling-place for the entire period laid down in the order.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Arabsko republiko Egipt
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Arab Republic of Egypt
(*) Poenostavljeni postopek - člen 43(1) poslovnika
(*) Simplified procedure - Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure
PE 396.516v02-00
PE 396.516v01-00
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Arabsko republiko Egipt
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an agreement on scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Arab Republic of Egypt
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2007)0362 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0352 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013)
– having regard to Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013)
UL L 412, 30.12.06, str.
OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 170 in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 170 and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0247/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0247/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6‑0429/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0429/2007 ),
Sporazum med ES in Egiptom o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju
Agreement between the EC and Egypt on scientific and technological cooperation
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 80/181/EGS o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic, ki se nanašajo na merske enote
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 80/181/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement
PE 396.549v03-00
PE 396.549v03-00
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0510 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0510 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 95 pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C5-0277/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0277/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6‑0430/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0430/2007 ),
Po širokem posvetovanju zainteresiranih strani in presoji vplivov Komisija predlaga posodobitev Direktive 80/181/EGS, ki od leta 1980 služi za standardizacijo zakonskih merskih enot znotraj EU.
Following broad stakeholder consultation and an impact assessment, the Commission proposes to update Directive 80/181/EEC, which since 1980 has served to standardise legal units of measurement within the EU.
Posodobitev bo omogočila uporabo dodatnih (nemetričnih) navedb za nedoločen čas.
The update will allow the use of supplementary (non-metric) indications indefinitely.
Poleg tega Združeno kraljestvo in Irska lahko nadaljujeta sedanjo prakso z uporabo pinte in unče ter Združeno kraljestvo z miljo.
Moreover the UK and Ireland can continue current practice in the use of the pint and 'troy' ounce, and in the UK the mile.
To je v skladu s cilji boljše priprave zakonodaje.
This is in line with better regulation aims.
Posodobitev bo poleg tega upoštevala tehnični napredek z vključitvijo novih metričnih enot, za katere velja mednarodni sporazum.
In additional the update will take account of technical progress to include new metric units subject to international agreement.
Uvedla bo predvsem novo enoto "katal" za katalitično aktivnost ter v svoje področje uporabe vključila varstvo potrošnikov in okolje.
Specifically, it will introduce the new "katal" unit for catalytic activity and include consumer protection and environment in its scope.
Poročilo predlaga, da se predlog odobri brez sprememb.
It is proposed in this report to approve the proposal without amendment.
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, ki je bil imenovan kot odbor, zaprošen za mnenje, se je strinjal, da se predlog podpre brez sprememb.
The ITRE Committee, which was designated as opinion giving Committee, agreed to endorse the proposal without amendment.
Uporabo merskih enot predpisuje EU z Direktivo Sveta 80/181/EGS z dne 20. decembra 1979, ki je bila nazadnje posodobljena leta 1999.
The use of units of measurement is prescribed in the EU by means of Council Directive 80/181/EEC of 20 December 1979, last updated in 1999.
Direktiva 80/181/EGS je bila sprejeta za standardizacijo zakonskih merskih enot znotraj EU v skladu z mednarodnim sistemom enot (SI), ki jih je sprejela generalna konferenca za uteži in mere, ustanovljena z Metrsko konvencijo, in podpisana v Parizu leta 1875.
Directive 80/181/EEC was adopted to standardise the use of legal units of measurement within the EU in accordance with the International System of Units (SI) adopted by the General Conference of Weights and Measures set up by the Metre Convention signed in Paris in 1875.
Metrski sistem SI je v okviru STO/TBT priznan kot mednarodni standard.
The SI metric system is recognised under WTO/TBT as the international standard.
Direktiva zagotavlja skupni pristop z odpravo trgovinskih ovir na notranjem trgu.
The Directive ensures a common approach, removing barriers to trade within the Internal Market.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da je uporaba dodatnih (nemetričnih) navedb lokalna, ne predstavlja netarifnih ovir in zato ni nobenega zadržka za čezmejno trgovino v EU.
Experience has however shown that use of supplementary (non-metric) indications are localised, do not constitute non-tariff barriers, and are therefore without any impediment to cross-border trade in the EU.
Direktiva 80/181/EGS vsebuje klavzulo, ki od leta 2009 prepoveduje uporabo vseh nemetričnih navedb.
Directive 80/181/EEC includes a clause which would prohibit all use of non-metric indications from 2009.
Če bi se ta klavzula še naprej uporabljala, bi moralo biti vse označevanje v EU samo v metričnih enotah.
If it were to apply, the EU would require all labelling to be metric-only.
Združeno kraljestvo in Irska bi nadalje morali odpraviti pinto za mleko v vračljivih steklenicah ter pivo in jabolčnik iz soda ter unčo za transakcije z žlahtnimi kovinami, Združeno kraljestvo pa bi moralo odpraviti miljo za prometne znake ter meritve hitrosti in razdalje.
The UK and Ireland would moreover need to phase out the pint for milk in returnable bottles and beer and cider on draught, and the 'troy' ounce for transactions in precious metals, and the UK would also have to phase out the mile for road traffic signs, speed and distance measurements.
Komisija je opravila oceno vpliva s primerjavo treh političnih alternativ: brez ukrepanja, razveljavitev direktive in posodobitev direktive.
The Commission conducted an impact assessment which compared the three policy alternatives of no action, repealing the Directive and updating the Directive.
To kaže, da je posodobitev direktive ob ohranjanju obstoječega stanja najprimernejša možnost, ker ne povzroča novih upravnih stroškov.
This showed that updating the Directive while maintaining the existing situation is clearly the preferred option because this entails no new administrative costs.
Posodobljeni predlogi bodo koristili tudi podjetjem, ki trgujejo s tretjimi državami, na primer Združenimi državami Amerike, ki zahtevajo konkurenčno metrično in nemetrično označevanje.
The updated proposals will also benefit companies trading with third countries, for example the USA, which require concurrent metric and non-metric labelling.
Druga dva pristopa bi verjetno imela za posledico velike stroške in bi se težko skladala z načelom subsidiarnosti.
Alternative approaches would likely result in significant costs and would not fit easily with the principle of subsidiarity.
To poročilo je predloženo v obravnavo na plenarnem zasedanju brez predlogov sprememb in razprave v skladu s členom 131.
The present report is submitted to plenary for treatment without amendment and without debate, in accordance with Rule 131.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 84/539/EGS o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o elektromedicinski opremi, ki se uporablja v veterinarstvu
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 84/539/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electro-medical equipment used in veterinary medicine
(Poenostavljeni postopek – člen 43(1) Poslovnika)
(Simplified Procedure - Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0465 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0465 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0255/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0255/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 51 in 43(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6‑0431/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0431/2007 ),
Razveljavitev Direktive Sveta 84/539/EGS (elektromedicinska oprema, ki se uporablja v veterinarstvu)
Repeal of Council Directive 84/539/EEC (electro-medical equipment used in veterinary medicine)
Datum posvetovanja EP
Date submitted to Parliament
o pospeševanju afriškega kmetijstva – predlog za kmetijski razvoj in varnost preskrbe s hrano v Afriki
on Advancing African Agriculture - Proposal for agricultural development and food security in Africa
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................20
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................20