natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- trenja med učinkovito in gospodarsko porabo (cenovna primernost) ter kar največjo absorpcijo,
- tensions between effective and economic spending (value for money) and maximising absorption,
- trenja, ki jih je povzročilo pravilo n+2 , ki je na eni strani omogočilo dobro načrtovane odhodke, na drugi strani pa olajšalo hitro dodeljevanje rezerv,
- tensions caused by the n+2 rule enabling, on the one hand, well planned expenditures, and, on the other hand, facilitating easy allocation of reserves,
- in trenja med dobro namernim vmesnim ocenjevanjem in pomanjkanjem podatkov;
- and tensions between a well-intentioned mid-term evaluation and the lack of data;
260. istočasno priznava, da je Komisija začela reševati številne pomanjkljivosti iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999
260.Recognises, at the same time, that the Commission undertook to address a number of weaknesses in Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation(EC) No 1260/1999
- splošno zahtevo po vmesnem vrednotenju so zamenjala tekoča vrednotenja na podlagi potreb zaradi ocene izvajanja programa in odziva na spremembe zunanjega okolja;
- the general requirement for mid-term evaluation was replaced by need-based ongoing evaluations to assess the implementation of a programme and react to changes of the external environment;
- nacionalna rezerva na podlagi doseženih rezultatov in varnostna rezerva nista več obvezni;
- national performance and contingency reserves became an option, and
- pravilo n+2 bo (za omejeno obdobje) postalo pravilo n+3 za države članice, katerih BDP na prebivalca je bil od leta 2001 do 2003 nižji od 85 % povprečja za EU-25;
- the n+2 rule will (for a limited period) become an n+3 rule for Member States whose GDP per head from 2001 to 2003 was below 85% of the EU-25 average;
261. poziva Komisijo, naj državam članicam na začetku programskega obdobja ponudi jasne smernice;
261.Calls on the Commission to make clear guidelines available to the Member States at the beginning of the programming period;
262. pozdravlja dejstvo, da so bili rezultati ocenjevalnih poročil upoštevani pri oblikovanju novih določb, ki urejajo strukturne sklade v obdobju 2007 – 2013; vendar pa obžaluje, da bodo ugotovitve Parlamenta po objavi posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 1/2007 imela le omejeno vrednost za trenutno programsko obdobje;
262.Welcomes the fact that the results of the evaluation reports were taken into consideration when the new regulations governing the structural funds during the period 2007 to 2013 were drafted; regrets however that the findings of Parliament following the publication of ECA's Special Report 1/2007 will only be of limited value for the current programming period;
263. zato poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme ustrezne ukrepe in tako v celoti vključi Parlament v spreminjanje pravil o strukturnih skladih, ki ga namerava opraviti pred naslednjim finančnim obdobjem, ki se bo začelo leta 2014;
263.Calls therefore on the Commission to take the necessary steps to fully involve Parliament in the modifications to the structural funds' regulations it intends to introduce in the run-up to the next financing period starting in 2014;
264. meni, da bi morala pravila o strukturnih skladih služiti za postopni učni proces, ki se mora odražati v pravnih določbah; to se zdi še bolj pomembno, če naknadno vrednotenje na koncu programskega obdobja ne more biti pravočasno dokončano, preden uredba, ki zajema novo finančno in programsko obdobje stopi v veljavo; poleg tega pa se je treba s pristojnim odborom Parlamenta redno posvetovati v različnih stopnjah finančnega obdobja;
264.Is of the opinion that the structural funds' regulations should provide for an incremental learning process to be reflected in the legal provisions; this seems all the more important as ex-post evaluations at the end of a programming period cannot be concluded in time before a regulation covering the new financing and programming period enters into force; in addition, Parliament's competent committees should be regularly consulted at the different stages during the financing period;
265. poziva Evropsko računsko sodišče in Komisijo, naj poročata o ukrepih, ki sta jih sprejela kot odziv na ugotovitve Parlamenta med postopkom razrešnice za leto 2006; dodatno poziva Komisijo, naj pristojnemu parlamentarnemu odboru predstavi ugotovitve iz naknadnega vrednotenja za obdobje 2000 – 2006;
265.Calls on the ECA and the Commission to report back on measures taken in reaction to Parliament's findings during the 2006 discharge procedure; in addition, calls on the Commission to present the findings of the 2000-2006 ex-post evaluations to Parliament's competent committee;
266. poziva Evropsko računsko sodišče, naj v danem trenutku v posebnem poročilu analizira uspešnost, učinkovitost in vpliv ukrepov, ki so bili financirani iz strukturnih skladov;
266.Asks the ECA to analyse the efficiency, the effectiveness and the impact of measures financed by the structural funds in a special report at the given moment;
Del II: Posebno poročilo št. 2/2007 o odhodkih institucij za zgradbe
Part II: Special Report No 2/2007 concerning the institutions' expenditure on buildings
267. sprejema dejstvo, da so dolgoročno načrtovanje in proračunske napovedi v gradbenem sektorju zahtevni, ker se o proračunskih sredstvih odloča na letni osnovi, ključne politične odločitve z velikimi posledicami za pisarniški prostor, kot so prihodnje širitve, pa niso ravno predvidljive; poleg tega pa izvajanje sklepov v gradbenem sektorju zahteva daljša časovna obdobja; predlaga, da mora biti v konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazih Unije določba o večjih vzdrževalnih delih;
267.Accepts that long-term planning and budgetary forecasts in the building sector are difficult because appropriations are decided on an annual basis, and because key political decisions with major implications for office space, such as enlargements, are not precisely foreseeable; in addition, implementation of decisions in the building sector requires significant lead time; suggests that there should be a provision in the Union's consolidated accounts for major maintenance work;
268. pozdravlja dejstvo, da inštitucije EU na splošno nudijo izbranim predstavnikom in uradnikom primerne delovne pogoje;
268.Welcomes the fact that the EU institutions offer elected representatives and officials - in general - appropriate working conditions;
269. vendar pa obžaluje, da inštitucije EU nikoli niso poskušale vzpostaviti skupne nepremičninske politike, ki bi jim lahko omogočila znatne prihranke; poziva inštitucije EU, naj obnovijo svoja prizadevanja za razvoj skupne nepremičninske politike in pristojnemu parlamentarnemu odboru poročajo še pravočasno za postopek razrešnice za leto 2007;
269.Regrets, however, that the EU institutions have never undertaken to develop a common buildings policy, which may have allowed them to make important savings; calls on the EU institutions to renew their efforts to develop a common buildings policy and to report to the competent parliamentary committee in time for 2007 discharge procedure;
270. inštitucije EU poziva, naj razvijejo skupna merila za izračunavanje pisarniških prostorov in stroškov, ter posledično ocenijo tako kratkoročne kot dolgoročne potrebe;
270.Calls on the EU institutions to develop common criteria for calculating office space and costs, and, subsequently, to appraise both short and long-term needs;
271. v zvezi s tem je seznanjen z dejstvom, da so inštitucije EU dale prednost nakupu stavb, saj je nakup za 40 do 50 % cenejši od najema;
271.Acknowledges in this context that the EU institutions have given priority to the purchase of buildings, as acquisition is 40 to 50% cheaper than renting;
272. ugotavlja, da je Evropsko računsko sodišče že leta 1979 priporočilo, da bi morale pogodbe o najemu vsebovati možnost odkupa po ceni, pri kateri se upošteva že plačana najemnina (pridobitvena emfitevza);
272.Notes that the ECA recommended already in 1979 that rental contracts should include an option to buy at a price which takes into account rent already paid (acquisitive emphyteusis);
273. obžaluje, da so pripombe Evropskega računskega sodišča glede nakupa stavb IPE 1-3 v Strasbourgu predstavile nepopolno sliko razmer za leto 2006; s tem v zvezi kaže na ugotovitve iz svoje resolucije z dne 26. septembra 2006, ki spremlja sklep o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2004
273.Regrets that the ECA's comments on the purchase of the IPE 1 - 3 buildings in Strasbourg draw an incomplete picture of the situation in 2006; in this context, points to the findings of its resolution of 26 September 2006 accompanying the decision on the discharge for the financial year 2004
3. , in zlasti točki 19 in 20 resolucije;
3. and in particular to points 19 and 20 thereof;
275. priznava, da inštitucije EU rade združujejo službe, ki delujejo na podobnih področjih;
275.Acknowledges that the EU institutions prefer bringing together services operating in similar areas;
276. priznava neskladje med praktičnimi prednostmi geografske bližine v evropski četrti ter finančnimi neugodnostmi, ki izhajajo iz ustvarjanja zelo visokega in predvidljivega povpraševanja na lokalnem stanovanjskem trgu;
276.Recognises the tension between the practical advantages of geographical proximity when staying in the European quarter, and the financial disadvantages stemming from creating a very high and predictable demand on the local housing market;
277. s tem v zvezi priznava prizadevanja Komisije za zmanjšanje odstotka svojih pisarniških prostorov v evropski četrti, ki trenutno znaša 82 %;
277.Acknowledges in this context the efforts made by the Commission to reduce the percentage of its office space in the European quarter, which currently stands at 82%;
278. poziva inštitucije EU, da pri premeščanju delov svojih služb pazljivo preučijo potrebo po tem, da se nahajajo v evropski četrti;
278.Calls on the EU institutions to evaluate carefully the necessity of staying in the European quarter when they re-house parts of their services;
279. sprašuje svojo upravo, zakaj je pri predaji stavb D4-D5 prišlo do zamud in zakaj ni bilo mogoče že na začetni fazi upoštevati zakonodaje o javnih naročilih, zapletenih postopkov pogajanja in dobre sosedske politike;
279.Asks its administration why the hand-over of the D4-D5 buildings was delayed and why it was not possible to take into consideration at an earlier stage public procurement legislation, complex negotiation procedures and a good neighbourhood policy ;
280. sprašuje inštitucije EU, zakaj so po mnenju Evropskega računskega sodišča tako obsežno uporabljale postopek s pogajanji, in se pri tem izognile javnim razpisom, ter na ta način plačujejo ceno za gradnjo stavb ali za dela, ki ni bila določena pod pogoji svobodne konkurence;
280.Asks the EU institutions why they made, according to the ECA, such a wide use of the negotiated procedure, avoiding public tender, thereby paying a price for the construction of buildings or for works which was not determined by open competition;
281. vztraja, da morajo inštitucije EU široko uporabljati konkurenčne razpise;
281.Insists that the EU institutions should make wide-spread use of competitive tendering;
282. poudarja, da pri pomanjkanju konkurenčnih razpisnih postopkov, nakupne cene za gradnje in/ali dolgoročne najemnine ne smejo preseči stroškov za gradnjo;
282.Underlines that in the absence of competitive tendering procedures, purchase prices for constructions and/or long-term rents should not exceed construction costs;
283. meni, da bi morala biti v dolgoročnih zakupnih pogodbah navedena nakupna cena, ter bi bilo treba od izvajalcev zahtevati primerna jamstva, da bi se zagotovila celovita izvedba pogodbe do končnega prevzema
283.Considers that long-term leasehold contracts should indicate the purchase price, and that appropriate financial guarantees should be required from contractors in order to ensure the full performance of contracts until final acceptance
Člen 102 finančne uredbe. ;
Article 102 of the Financial Regulation. ;
284. poziva inštitucije EU, da z državami članicami gostiteljicami glavnih krajev dela inštitucij EU sklenejo 'sporazume o sedežu';
284.Calls on the EU institutions to establish "headquarter agreements" with the host countries of the EU institutions´ main working places;
285. poudarja, da Skupnosti in organi, ki jih te ustanovijo, v skladu s členom 14 finančne uredbe, ne smejo najemati posojil; s tem v zvezi predlaga, da se pri določanju obrestnih mer v večji meri uporabljajo finančne storitve Evropske investicijske banke in razpisni postopki na finančnem trgu;
285.Points out that, according to Article 14 of the Financial Regulation, the Communities and the bodies set up by them may not raise loans; in this context suggests that greater use could be made of the financial services of the European Investment Bank, and of tendering procedures on the financial market to determine the interest rate;
286. ponovno poudarja svoje stališče o vključitvi nepremičninske politike v proračun, kot je bilo ponovljeno tudi v točki 5 resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2007, ki spremlja sklep o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2005 Oddelek I – Evropski parlament
286.Reiterates its position on the budgetisation of its buildings policy, as repeated in point 5 of its resolution of 24 April 2007 accompanying the decision on the discharge for the financial year 2005, Section I - European Parliament
UL C 74 E, 20.3.2008, str.
OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p.
287. poziva Evropsko računsko sodišče, da razloži na kakšen način bi lahko inštitucije EU bolje uporabile diferencirana sredstva;
287.Asks the ECA to explain how the EU institutions could make better use of "differentiated appropriations";
288. poudarja, da bi morale imeti inštitucije EU popolno upravno, tehnično in finančno kontrolo nad svojimi nepremičninskimi projekti; v ta namen bi morale uporabiti visokokvalificirane svetovalce ali pa razviti ustrezno strokovno znanje v medinstitucionalnem okviru
288.Emphasises that the EU institutions should have complete administrative, technical and financial control over their building projects; to this end they should either make use of highly qualified consultants or develop appropriate expertise within the inter-institutional framework
Letno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 1999, odstavek 6.30 (UL C 342, 1.12.2000). ;
ECA annual report concerning the financial year 1999, paragraph 6.30 (OJ C 342, 1.12.2000). ;
289. opozarja inštitucije EU na svojo zahtevo, ki je bila izražena v točki 19 zgoraj omenjene resolucije, ki spremlja sklep o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2004: '(...) po posvetovanju z drugimi institucijami Unije poziva svojo upravo, naj pripravi poročilo o tem, ali bi bilo mogoče ustanoviti evropsko službo za gradbena dela, ki bi bila pristojna za gradnjo in vzdrževanje stavb institucij in organov EU; poziva, naj se to poročilo posreduje Odboru za proračunski nadzor najpozneje do 1. oktobra 2007';
289.Reminds the EU institutions of its demand expressed in point 19 of its above-mentioned resolution accompanying the discharge decision for the financial year 2004: "(...) charges its administration, in consultation with the other Union institutions, to draw up a report examining whether it might be feasible to establish a European Buildings Authority charged with responsibility for the construction and maintenance of the buildings of the EU institutions and bodies; calls for such report to be forwarded to the Committee on Budgetary Control by 1 October 2007 at the latest";
Del III: Posebno poročilo št. 3/2007 o upravljanju Evropskega sklada za begunce (2000-2004)
Part III: Special Report No 3/2007 concerning the management of the European Refugee Fund (2000-2004)
290. vse udeležene strani opozarja, da je bil Evropski slad za begunce (ESB) ustanovljen z namenom vzpostavitve okvira za pripravo skupne azilne politike, vključno s skupno evropsko ureditvijo glede azila, kot sestavnega dela cilja Evropske unije o postopnem oblikovanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, odprtega za vse tiste, ki zakonito iščejo zaščito v Evropski uniji;
290.Reminds all actors of the fact that the European Refugee Fund (ERF) was set up with the aim of providing a framework for the preparation of a common policy on asylum, including common European arrangements for asylum as a component of the EU's objective of progressively creating an area of freedom, security and justice which will be open to those legitimately seeking protection within it;
291. poudarja dejstvo, da je bilo vse od vzpostavitve ESB I sprejetih veliko direktiv, uredb in odločb, in nekatere od njih je posredno ali neposredno spodbudila vzpostavitev Sklada;
291.Underlines the fact that since the creation of ERF I a large number of directives, regulations and decisions has been adopted, some of which have been directly or indirectly promoted by the creation of the fund;
292. poudarja, da bo ESB III
292.Underlines the fact that ERF III
Odločba št. 573/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 v okviru splošnega programa "Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov" in o razveljavitvi Sklepa Sveta 2004/904/ES (UL L 144, 6.6.2007, str.
Decision No 573/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ and repealing Council Decision 2004/904/EC (OJ L 144, 6.6.2007, p.
1). deloval pod drugačnimi pogoji kot ESB I; poleg tega pa meni, da mora biti tesno povezan z izvajanjem Direktive Sveta 2001/55/ES
1). will work under different conditions from those of ERF I; therefore, it should be closely linked to the implementation of Council Directives 2001/55/EC
Direktiva Sveta 2001/55/ES z dne 20. julija 2001 o najnižjih standardih za dodelitev začasne zaščite v primeru množičnega prihoda razseljenih oseb in o ukrepih za uravnoteženje prizadevanj in posledic za države članice pri sprejemanju takšnih oseb (UL L 212, 7.8.2001, str.
Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (OJ L 212, 7.8.2001, p.
12). in Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES
12). and 2004/83/EC
Direktiva Sveta 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite (UL L 304, 30.9.2004, str.
Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (OJ L 304, 30.9.2004, p.
293. poudarja, da mora ESB III vsekakor še naprej prispevati k nadaljnjemu razvoju politike EU na tem področju, zlasti pri pripravi revizije dublinske konvencije II, vključno s ponovnim osredotočenjem na prostovoljno prerazporeditev prosilcev za azil znotraj EU, da bo tako dosežen sporazum o porazdelitvi bremena;
293.Stresses that ERF III should, however, continue to contribute to the further development of an EU policy in this area, in particular the preparation of a review of the "Dublin II convention", including a refocusing on a voluntary redeployment of asylum seekers within the EU in order to come to a burden-sharing arrangement;
294. poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za preprečevanje različnih razlag držav članic glede pravil ESB in pozdravlja začetek seminarjev o dobri praksi, kjer so predstavljene izkušnje, ki so si jih nekatere države članice pridobile, zlasti novim državam članicam, ki so o ESB manj obveščene;
294.Invites the Commission to continue its efforts to prevent different interpretations of ERF rules by Member States, and welcomes the launch of seminars on good practice disseminating experience gained in some Member States to others, in particular to new Member States still less familiar with the ERF;
295. poziva Komisijo, naj na vse možne načine pospeši plačila državam članicam in poveča njihovo ozaveščenost glede potrebe po pravočasnem nakazovanju plačil, zlasti za manjše upravičence, da se tako ne ogrozi inovativnih projektov in se omogoči sodelovanje pri ESB III tudi nevladnim organizacijam z majhnim proračunom;
295.Invites the Commission to do everything possible to speed up payments to Member States and to raise awareness among Member States of the need to disburse payments, in particular for smaller beneficiaries, in time in order not to endanger innovative projects and to allow also NGOs with a smaller budget backing to participate in ERF III;
296. vztraja, naj nacionalne izjave o zanesljivosti zajamejo vsa področja, na katerih so države članice soodgovorne za porabo sredstev EU, na primer ESB;
296.Insists that national declarations of assurance should cover all areas where Member States are co-responsible for the spending of EU funds, e.g. the ERF;
297. poziva generalni direktorat za proračun, naj ponovno preuči svoje prakse izterjave, saj izterjava prek nesorodnih projektov zavira delovanje specifičnega programa (zlasti, kadar povzroči pozna plačila vnaprej financiranih zneskov); namesto samodejne izterjave iz katerega koli prihodnjega plačila zadevne države članice, so nalogi za izterjavo izdani ministrstvu za finance te države članice;
297.Invites the Directorate General for Budget to reconsider its practice of recoveries, as recovery via non-related projects is counterproductive to the functioning of specific programmes (in particular resulting in late payments of pre-financing amounts); recovery orders should be issued to the Ministry of Finance of the Member State concerned, rather than automatically recovering from any upcoming payment to that Member State;
298. poziva Komisijo, naj sredstva ESB uporablja na bolj proaktiven način, da se tako spodbudi napredek na področju skupne azilne politike;
298.Invites the Commission to use the ERF even more proactively, in order to enhance progress towards a Common Policy on Asylum;
Del IV: Posebno poročilo št. 4/2007 o fizičnih pregledih in pregledih zamenjave pri pošiljkah, upravičenih do izvoznega nadomestila
Part IV: Special Report 4/2007 on physical and substitution checks on export refund consignments
300. pozdravlja objavo posebnega poročila št. 4/2007 in odločno poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva pomanjkljivosti, ki so opredeljene v njem, ter sprejme ukrepe v skladu s priporočili Evropskega računskega sodišča;
300.Welcomes the publication of Special Report 4/2007 and urges the Commission to take on board the shortcomings identified in the report, as well as to take action in line with the recommendations of the ECA;
301. soglaša s Komisijo, da mora do izplačila zadnjega izvoznega nadomestila "ostati v veljavi popolnoma delujoč kontrolni sistem"; zato od nje pričakuje, da v skladu s pristojnostjo dajanja pobud pripravi konkretne predloge za izboljšanje razmer;
301.Agrees with the Commission that until the last export refund is paid, "a fully operational control system must remain in place"; expects therefore the Commission to use its power of initiative to come up with concrete proposals in order to improve the situation;
302. s tem v zvezi pozdravlja Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 14/2008 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 386/90 o opravljanju nadzora pri izvozu kmetijskih proizvodov, za katere se dobijo izvozna nadomestila ali drugi zneski
302.Welcomes in this respect Council Regulation (EC) No 14/2008 amending Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 on the monitoring carried out at the time of export of agricultural products receiving refunds or other amounts
UL L 8, 11.1.2008, str.
OJ L 8, 11.1.2008, p.