natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalka predlaga, da se program za prestrukturiranje sklada za mleko vzpostavi v okviru spremembe Uredbe o skupni organizaciji trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov (in ne v predlogu o standardizaciji).
The rapporteur suggests that the milk fund restructuring programme should be set up in the context of amending the regulation on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (and not in the standardisation proposal).
Tako bodo doseženi dejanski prihranki zaradi nižjih odhodkov, povezanih z izvozom masla in znižanjem intervencijske cene za posneto mleko v prahu od leta 2008, čeprav je podlaga za prihranke standardizacija.
Although standardisation is the basis of the savings, the real savings will be made in connection with the lower outgoings linked to butter exports and the lowering of the intervention price for SMP as of 2008.
Skupna organizacija trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov (sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1255/1999)
Common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2597/97 o določitvi dodatnih pravil o skupni ureditvi trga z mlekom in mlečnimi proizvodi za konzumno mleko
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 laying down additional rules on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products for drinking milk
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0058 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0058 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0085/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0085/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6‑0284/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0284/2007 ),
(4) Da se zagotovi jasnost za potrošnike, se takšno mleko ne sme imenovati polnomastno, polposneto ali posneto mleko, ampak je treba na embalaži jasno označiti odstotek vsebnosti maščobe.
(4) In order to provide clarity for the consumers, such milk should however not be called whole milk, semi-skimmed milk or skimmed milk but have their fat content percentage clearly indicated on the packaging.
(4) Da se zagotovi jasnost za potrošnike, se takšno mleko ne sme imenovati polnomastno, polposneto ali posneto mleko, ampak bi bilo treba na embalaži v neposredni povezavi z oznako izdelka jasno označiti odstotek vsebnosti maščobe v mleku .
(4) In order to provide clarity for the consumers, such milk should however not be called whole milk, semi-skimmed milk or skimmed milk but the milk fat content percentage should be clearly indicated on the packaging directly next to the product description .
V osnutku uredbe je treba jasneje opredeliti merila za natančno označevanje izdelka (mleko) ter njegovo embalažo in/ali označevanje.
The criteria for a more precise product description (milk) and its packaging and/or labelling should be more clearly defined in the draft regulation.
„ Toplotno obdelano mleko, ki ni v skladu z zahtevami o vsebnosti maščobe iz točk b), c) in d) prvega pododstavka, se lahko šteje za konzumno mleko, če je vsebnost maščobe na embalaži jasno označena in lahko berljiva v obliki ‚ vsebnost maščobe ... %‘.
Heat-treated milk not complying with the fat content requirements laid down in points (b), (c) and (d) of the first subparagraph may be considered drinking milk provided that the fat content is clearly indicated and easily readable on the packaging in form of ‘ fat content of ...%’.
Takšno mleko ne bo označeno kot polnomastno, delno posneto ali posneto mleko.
Such milk shall not be described as whole milk, semi-skimmed milk or skimmed milk.
Države članice lahko proizvajalcem dovolijo, da vsebnost maščobe navedejo v obliki „vsebnost maščobe… % + 0,2 %.“
Member States may allow producers to indicate the fat content in the form of ‘fat content of …% + 0.2%’ .
„ Toplotno obdelano mleko, ki ni v skladu z zahtevami o vsebnosti maščobe iz točk b), c) in d) prvega pododstavka, se šteje za konzumno mleko v skladu z opredelitvami direktive 2000/13/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. marca 2000 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic na področju označevanja, predstavljanja in oglaševanja živil , če je vsebnost maščobe na embalaži jasno označena in lahko berljiva ter v neposredni povezavi z oznako izdelka v obliki ‚ mlečna maščoba ... %‘.
Heat-treated milk not complying with the fat content requirements laid down in points (b), (c) and (d) of the first subparagraph shall be considered drinking milk in accordance with the definitions in Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs 1 provided that the fat content is clearly indicated and easily readable and directly next to the product description on the packaging in form of ‘ milk ...% fat ’.
Takšno mleko ne bo označeno kot polnomastno, delno posneto ali posneto mleko. “
Such milk shall not be described as whole milk, semi-skimmed milk or skimmed milk.
1 UL L 109, 6.5.2000, str.
1 OJ L 109, 6.5.2000, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2006/142/ES (UL L 368, 23.12.2006, str.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2006/142/EC ( OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p.
Na embalaži je treba navesti povezavo med vsebnostjo maščobe in oznako izdelka ter specifično vsebnost maščobe.
The link between the fat content and product description and the specific fat content should be indicated on the packaging.
Poleg tega je treba natančneje opredeliti področje uporabe s sklicevanjem na Direktivo 2000/13/ES, ki vsebuje splošna pravila o označevanju živil.
In addition, the scope should be more precisely expressed through a reference to Directive 2000/13/EC that lays down the general rules for food labelling.
Prave potrebe po uvedbi tolerančne meje „+ 0,2%" ni in tudi ne bi imela resničnih prednosti.
There is no real need to include a margin of tolerance of ‘± 0.2%’ as it would have no practical advantages.
Uvedba te meje bi povzročala (precejšnje) nejasnosti in bi poleg tega oteževala usklajeno izvajanje.
The introduction of such a tolerance margin could lead to (considerable) ambiguities and make harmonised implementation more difficult.
Trenutno so v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2597/97 določene le tri kategorije konzumnega mleka, ki se lahko proizvajajo in tržijo v Skupnosti.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 currently recognises only three categories of drinking milk that can be produced and marketed in the Community.
To so posneto mleko (z največ 0,5 % maščobe), delno posneto mleko (z 1,5 % do 1,8 % maščobe) in polnomastno mleko (z najmanj 3,5 % maščobe).
These are skimmed milk (maximum 0.5% fat), semi-skimmed milk (1.5% to 1.8% fat) and whole milk (at least 3.5% fat).
Komisija predlaga, da bi s spremembo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2597/97 v Evropski uniji dovolili tudi proizvodnjo in prodajo konzumnega mleka, ki ga ni mogoče uvrstiti v nobeno dosedanjih treh kategorij, če je na etiketi jasno in čitljivo označena vsebnost maščob.
By amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 the Commission proposes to allow the production and marketing of drinking milk that does not comply with the present three categories in the European Union as long as a clear and easily readable indication of the fat content is present on the label.
Poleg liberalizacije trga za konzumno mleko bo na osnovi predloga mogoče tudi odpraviti različne na nacionalni ravni sprejete prehodne predpise in odstopanja od sedanje omejitve na tri kategorije mleka.
As well as liberalising the drinking-milk market, the proposal also means that different (national) transitional provisions and derogations from the current limit of three milk categories will no longer be necessary.
Predlagana uvedba prožnejše opredelitve konzumnega mleka vodi v liberalizacijo trga za konzumno mleko.
The proposal to introduce a more flexible definition of ‘drinking milk’ will lead to the liberalisation of the drinking-milk market.
Ne gre pa spregledati, da bi lahko predlog poleg večje prožnosti in morebitnih prednosti, ki jih prinaša blagovni menjavi in potrošnikom znotraj Skupnosti, pri slednjih povzročil tudi negotovost ali zmedo.
However, it should be noted that while the proposal may lead to increased flexibility with possible advantages for intra-Community trade and the consumer, it may also lead to consumer uncertainty and confusion.
Zato je treba poudariti, da je formulacija Komisije „jasno označen in lahko berljiv” v zvezi s pravilnim označevanjem izdelkov zelo široka in nejasna.
Thus it should be emphasised that the Commission’s wording ‘easily readable and visible’ with regard to correct labelling is very broad and ambiguous.
Prehodni predpisi in izjeme, ki omogočajo proizvodnjo in trženje mleka zunaj dosedanjih treh kategorij, so del različnih pristopnih pogodb.
The transitional provisions and derogations that allow for production and marketing of milk outside the three current categories form part of different accession treaties.
Te izjeme se bodo v letu 2009 iztekle in bodo v vsakem primeru nične, če bo obravnavani predlog sprejet.
These derogations will expire in 2009 and in any case will be invalid if this proposal is adopted.
Mnenje in zaključki poročevalke
Rapporteur’s opinion and conclusions
Poročevalka pozdravlja večjo prožnost pri opredelitvi konzumnega mleka.
The rapporteur welcomes the increased flexibility in the definition of drinking milk.
S tem se povečujejo možnosti in svoboda izbire potrošnikov.
The consumer’s options and freedom of choice are increased.
Predlagani ukrepi liberalizacije lahko poživijo trgovino z mlečnimi izdelki v Skupnosti.
The proposed liberalisation measures may lead to a revival in intra-Community trade in milk products.
Poleg tega poročevalka odobrava dejstvo, da predlog, s tem ko omogoča odpravo različnih prehodnih predpisov in izjem, prispeva k poenostavitvi evropske kmetijske politike in njenega izvajanja.
The rapporteur also welcomes the fact that the proposal contributes to simplifying European agricultural policy and its implementation as it makes many transitional provisions and derogations unnecessary.
Boji se pa, da bi dovoljena proizvodnja in trženje izdelkov iz konzumnega mleka zunaj dosedanjih treh kategorij zaradi nedoločnosti predloga v zvezi z označevanjem teh izdelkov privedla do zmede in negotovosti pri potrošnikih.
The rapporteur is nevertheless concerned that allowing the production and marketing of drinking milk products outside the three current categories may lead to confusion and uncertainty for the consumer owing to the vagueness of the proposal for labelling.
Pogreša jasno povezavo med oznako izdelka in obstoječimi pravili označevanja.
The rapporteur would like an unambiguous link between the product description and the existing labelling rules.
Zato je treba zahtevati bolj jasno in nedvoumno označevanje izdelkov.
Clearer and unambiguous product descriptions must therefore be sought.
Poleg tega poročevalka meni, da pri navedbi vsebnosti maščobe ni treba uvesti tolerančne meje „+ 0,2%”.
In addition the rapporteur feels that it is not necessary to allow a margin of tolerance of ‘±0.2%’ for the fat content indication.
To pravilo ne zagotavlja jasnosti in otežuje usklajeno izvajanje.
This rule does not lead to clarity and makes harmonised implementation more difficult.
Zato poročevalka kljub splošni naklonjenosti predlogu Komisije o prožnejšem pristopu predlaga nekaj manjših sprememb pri označevanju in opustitev tolerančne meje „+ 0,2%”.
Therefore, despite her general support for the Commission’s proposal for a more flexible approach, the rapporteur suggests making a few minor changes to the labelling and doing without the ‘±0.2%’ margin of tolerance.
Dodatna pravila o skupni ureditvi trga z mlekom in mlečnimi proizvodi za konzumno mleko (sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 2597/97)
Additional rules on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products for drinking milk (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 2597/97)
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1059/2003 o oblikovanju skupne klasifikacije statističnih teritorialnih enot (NUTS) zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0095 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0095 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 285(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0091/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0091/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6‑0285/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0285/2007 ),
UVODNA IZJAVA 4 a (novo)
RECITAL 4a (new)
(4 a) Ker ciljev iz uredbe, namreč priprave skupnih statističnih standardov za izdelavo usklajenih podatkov, ni mogoče zadovoljivo doseči z ukrepi držav članic samih in jih je zato laže doseči na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
(4 a) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the creation of common statistical standards that permit the production of harmonised data, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting alone and can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
PRILOGA III, TOČKA 1 Priloga III (Uredba (ES) št. 1059/2003 )
ANNEX III, POINT 1 Annex III (Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003)
Med Belgijo in Češko se vstavi naslednje:
The following is inserted between Belgium and the Czech Republic:
„za Bolgarijo ‚ Населени места (Naseleni mesta) ‘,“
“for Bulgaria ‘ Населени места (Naseleni mesta) ’,”
„za Bolgarijo ‚ Общини (Obshtini) ‘‚“
“for Bulgaria ‘ Общини (Obshtini) ’, ”
Regionalna statistika se na ravni Skupnosti uporablja za številne zelo različne namene.
Regional statistics are used at Community level as an objective statistical base for a number of very diverse purposes.
Nekateri med njimi imajo velik pomen za politiko, na primer določanje področij, ki so upravičena do strukturnih skladov ali državne pomoči (v zadnjem primeru se zahteva skladnost s členi 87–89 Pogodbe ES).
Major political importance attaches to some of these, e.g. the determination of the areas eligible for the Structural Funds or for state aids (in the latter case, subject to compatibility with Articles 87 to 89 of the EC Treaty).
Uredba ES št. 1059/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta vzpostavi skupno klasifikacijo statističnih teritorialnih enot (NUTS), ki temelji na demografskih merilih, pri čemer izhaja iz potrebe Skupnosti po ustrezni pravni podlagi za takšno klasifikacijo.
Regulation EC 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council establishes a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) based on demographic criteria, pursuant to the Community's need for a suitable legal basis for such classification.
Regionalna statistika je temelj evropskega statističnega sistema, saj jo zelo različni uporabniki uporabljajo za zelo različne namene.
Regional statistics are a cornerstone of the European statistical system, being used for a wide range of purposes and by a wide range of users.
Priprava uredbe, ki bi NUTS zagotovila pravni status, se je začela spomladi 2000, leta 2003 pa je bila sprejeta in stopila v veljavo zgoraj omenjena Uredba.
The work on a Regulation to give NUTS a legal status started in spring 2000, with the adoption and entering into force in 2003 of the above mentioned Regulation.
Trenutna razdelitev NUTS vsako državo članico nadalje razčleni na določeno število regij na ravni NUTS 1.
The current NUTS breakdown subdivides each Member State into a number of regions at NUTS 1 level.
Vsaka od teh regij se nato razdeli na regije na ravni NUTS 2, te pa v nadaljevanju na regije na ravni NUTS 3.
Each of these is then subdivided into regions at NUTS level 2, and these in turn into regions at NUTS level 3.
Evropski parlament je pozival k vključitvi četrte kategorije NUTS (glej na primer poročilo A5-0071/2003 ); poročevalka: Rosa Miguélez Ramos), da bi bile zajete manjše teritorialne enote.
The European Parliament has urged for including a fourth NUTS category (see for example report A5-0071/2003 ; rapporteur: Rosa Miguélez Ramos) in order to cover smaller territorial units.
Da bi zadostila vse večji splošni potrebi po informacijah na lokalni ravni, je Komisija vzpostavila medregionalni informacijski sistem ter v njegovem okviru najprej pripravila klasifikacijo lokalnih upravnih enot (LAU), združljivih z NUTS.
In order to meet a growing general need for information at local level, the Commission set up an infra-regional information system, the first step being to compile a Community classification of local administrative units ("LAU") compatible with NUTS.
LAU so torej temeljne komponente regij NUTS.
Accordingly, the LAU are the basic components of NUTS regions.
Sledila je določitev še dveh ravni LAU v skladu z načeli NUTS, vendar je bila za vse države članice določena le zadnja in najmanjša (raven LAU 2).
Following this, two further LAU levels have been defined in accordance with the NUTS principles, but only the last and smallest (LAU level 2) has been fixed for all Member States.
Ta običajno odgovarja pojmu „občina“.
This usually corresponds to the concept of the 'municipality' or 'commune'.
Ker se je bližal vstop velikega števila novih držav članic v Unijo, so bila merila postavljena z namenom, da se pojasni referenčne teritorialne enote (NUTS) in tako določi dosledna regionalna razdelitev teritorija za statistične namene.
With the approach of a large number of new Member States entering the Union, the criteria was set to clarify the reference territorial units (NUTS) in order to define a consistent regional breakdown of territory for statistical purposes.
Ta izključno tehnični vidik pa je dejansko imel velike posledice za lokalne in regionalne oblasti.
This purely technical aspect had in fact major implications for local and regional governments.
Leta 2005 je Komisija predložila sporočilo v skladu s členom 2(5) zgoraj navedene Uredbe ES 1059/2003 o primernosti uvedbe pravil za vseevropsko podrobnejšo členitev ravni klasifikacije NUTS ( KOM(2005)0473 ).
In 2005, the Commission presented a Communication as provided for in art 2(5) of the above mentioned Regulation EC 1059/2003, on the appropriateness of establishing rules on a Europe-wide basis for more detailed levels in the NUTS Classification ( COM(2005)0473 ).
V sporočilu (KOM(2005)473 končno) je Komisija prišla do zaključka, „naj se trenutno v okviru Uredbe NUTS ne predvidi dodatna raven regionalne razdelitve“.
The Commission concludes in its Communication (COM(2005)473 final) that, currently, no additional level of regional breakdown should be envisaged in the framework of the NUTS Regulation.
Predlog uredbe Evropske komisije
The European Commission proposal for a regulation
Komisija predlaga spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1059/2003 o oblikovanju skupne klasifikacije statističnih teritorialnih enot (NUTS) zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k EU.
The Commission is proposing to amend Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU.
Uredba o spremembi uredbe skladno sledi prejšnji taki uredbi (Uredbi (ES) št. 1888/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta), ki jo je spodbudil pristop desetih držav članic leta 2004.
The amending Regulation coherently follows a previous one, Regulation (EC) No 1888/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council due to the accession of ten Member States in 2004.
Mnenje poročevalca je, da je treba v skladu s predlogom Komisije klasifikacijo teritorialnih enot Bolgarije in Romunije vključiti v statistično klasifikacijo Skupnosti.
According to your rapporteur, it is necessary to integrate, in line with the Commission proposal, the classification of the territorial units of Bulgaria and Romania into the statistical classification of the Community.
Zato odobrava s tem povezano pobudo Komisije glede prilagoditve prilog Uredbe (ES) 1059/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
He therefore welcomes the Commission's initiative regarding adaptation of the annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council in this regard.
Poročevalec meni, da predlogi spremembe k predlogu Komisije niso potrebni.
Your rapporteur does not consider it necessary to table amendments to the Commission proposal.
Kot je že v prejšnji fazi opozoril Evropski parlament, pa je vseeno treba osvetliti nekatere elemente, na primer obravnavo manjših upravnih enot.
Nonetheless, as has been stressed by the European Parliament earlier, certain elements should be highlighted such as the treatment of smaller administrative units.
Raven NUTS za „manjše upravne enote“ bi pripomogla k temu, da bi se natančneje odražale dejanske okoliščine in da bi se preprečilo neenakosti, kot je recimo vključitev regionalnih enot z zelo različnimi skupinami prebivalcev v isto raven NUTS.
A NUTS level for 'smaller administrative units' would make it possible to reflect real circumstances more accurately and avoid anomalies such as the presence of regional units with highly differing populations within the same NUTS level.
Poročevalec zato odločno spodbuja Komisijo, naj, kot tudi sama omenja v sporočilu (KOM(2005)473 končno), ponovno oceni stanje v prihodnjem letu, takoj po začetku novega obdobja kohezijske politike, da natančneje preuči nadaljnje možnosti uvedbe še ene ravni NUTS.
Your rapporteur therefore strongly encourages the Commission, as also mentioned in the Communication (COM(2005)473 final), to reassess the situation during the year to come, which follows the start of the new Cohesion Policy period, in order to look closer at the prospects of creating another NUTS level.
Pozornost pa je treba nameniti Prilogi 3, kot je bila spremenjena, ki v primeru dveh romunskih regij ne spoštuje dosledno meril populacije, saj sta regiji v uredbi označeni kot neupravni.
Attention should, however, be paid concerning Annex 3 as amended which do not strictly follows the population criteria with regard to two regions in Romania, named non-administrative in the regulation.
Poročevalec ne vidi potrebe, da bi predlagal drugo klasifikacijo, saj se ta zaradi kontinuitete statističnih podatkov zdi najboljša, poleg tega pa se z njo strinjajo pristojni organi.
Since this appeared the best classification to make for the sake of continuity of statistical data, and since, this classification was also agreed upon by concerned authorities, your rapporteur does not see any need to propose other classification.
Primerno pa bi bilo, da se klasifikacija pregleda v okviru naslednje revizije trenutne strukture.
However, it would be appropriate to revise this classification in the next revision of current structure.
Poročevalec tudi priporoča, naj Komisija v evropskem merilu aktivno podpre uskladitev ravni LAU1.
Furthermore, your rapporteur recommends the harmonisation of LAU level 1 to be supported actively by the Commission at a European scale.