natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izvzete uporabe snovi, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč – Protokol omogoča prilagodljivost pri uporabi nadzorovanih snovi, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč, kadar na primer ni na voljo tehnično ali gospodarsko izvedljivih nadomestnih snovi za nekatere vrste uporabe, kot je na primer uporaba metilbromida za karantenske ukrepe in predtovorna opravila ali uporaba kot surovina (člen 12).
Exempted uses of ODS – The Protocol provides for a degree of flexibility on use of controlled ODS, e.g. where no technically or economically viable alternatives are yet available or for certain applications, such as use of methyl bromide for quarantine and pre-shipment purposes or feedstock (article 12).
V skladu z nedavnim Sklepom Komisije (2008/753/ES) o nevključitvi metilbromida v Prilogo I Direktive 91/414/EGS (o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet) bi morala biti uporaba metilbromida neposredno prepovedana.
According to the a recent Commission Decision (2008/753/EC) concerning the non-inclusion of methyl bromide in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC (concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market) should result in a direct prohibition of the use of methyl bromide.
Še večji razlog za zaskrbljenost so haloni, ker imajo največji potencial za tanjšanje ozonskega plašča (in za veliko povečanje učinka tople grede).
Halons are even of much more concern because they have the highest potential to deplete the ozone layer (and also a very high greenhouse effect).
Zato je treba čim bolj omejiti uporabo halonov, kar je že bil namen obstoječe uredbe.
The use of halons should therefore be restricted as much as possible, which was already the intention in the existing Regulation.
Vendar pa Priloga VI doslej še ni bila revidirana.
However the revision of Annex VI did not take place until now.
Revizija Priloge v bližnji prihodnosti je zelo pomembna (glej člen 13 predloga Komisije).
It is very important that this will be done in the near future (see article 13 of the Commission proposal).
Ker so na voljo snovi, ki lahko nadomestijo halone v protipožarnih sistemih, se zdaj lahko določijo končni datumi za obstoječe uporabe.
As alternatives are now available to replace halons in fire protection applications, end dates for existing applications can now be set.
V členu 11 je predlagano, da se naprej premakne rok za proizvodnjo delno halogeniranih klorofluoroogljikovodikov v Evropi za izvoz (z leta 2025 na leto 2020) glede na Montrealski protokol.
In article 11 the deadline for the HCFCs production in Europe for export is proposed to be brought forward (from 2025 to 2020) according to the Montreal Protocol.
Predlagano je, da se pregledna študija podjetij Milieu Ltd in Ecosphere Lda izvede leta 2015, vendar Komisija ni sprejela tega predloga.
The review study by Milieu Ltd and Ecosphere Lda proposed to be at 2015, but the Commission have not adopted this suggestion.
Nove snovi, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč – Na podlagi novih znanstvenih dokazov je dejavnik škodljivosti za ozon nekaterih kemičnih snovi, ki zdaj niso nadzorovane na podlagi Protokola, precej višji, trženje teh snovi pa hitro narašča.
New ODS – New scientific evidence has revealed that the ODP of certain chemical substances not currently controlled by the Protocol is substantially higher, whilst marketing of these substances is growing rapidly.
V oceni UNEP/SMO o ozonskem plašču iz leta 2006 je bilo ugotovljeno, da „imajo zelo kratkožive snovi pri tanjšanju ozonskega plašča pomembnejšo vlogo, kot pa so ocenjevali doslej“.
The 2006 UNEP/WMO ozone assessment concludes that "the role of very short-lived substances in ozone depletion is of greater importance than previously assessed”.
Drugo vprašanje je prepoved izvoza iz člena 17.
Another issue is the export ban in article 17.
Zelo je pomembno, da je pri prepovedi izvoza čim manj izjem.
It is very important that there are lesser exemptions on this export ban.
V praksi bo težko nadzorovati in ohranjati veliko izjem.
Many exemptions will be hard to check and to maintain in practice.
Izvoz snovi, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč, je treba iz etičnih in okoljskih razlogov čim bolj omejiti, zlasti ko gre za halone in delno halogenirane klorofluoroogljikovodike.
For ethical and environmental reasons the export of ozone depleting substances should be limited as far as possible, especially in the case of Halons and HCFC’s.
Tveganje, da se te snovi z velikim dejavnikom škodljivosti za ozon (in velikim učinkom tople grede) sprostijo v ozračje, je preveliko.
There is a too high risk that these substances with a high ozone depleting potential (and a high greenhouse effect) can be released into the atmosphere.
Kar zadeva inšpekcijske preglede, bo za dejansko zmanjšanje količine, snovi, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč, ter za večjo gostoto ozonskega plašča potrebna trdnejša struktura, ki bo v skladu s priporočilom o okoljskih inšpekcijskih pregledih.
Regarding inspections a stronger structure, in line with the recommendation on environmental inspections, will be necessary in order to reach the real decrease of ODS and an increase of the thickness of the ozone layer.
Cilj predlaganih predlogov sprememb v tem poročilu je nadaljnje izboljšanje uredbe glede na navedene izzive.
The proposed amendments of this report aims to improve the Regulation further in line with the above mentioned challenges.
Na ta način si lahko EU zastavi bolj smele cilje in prevzame vodilno vlogo v svetu.
In this way the EU can be more ambitious for itself and take a leading role in the world.
To nas bo še bolj zaščitilo pred uničujočimi vplivi prevelikega ultravijoličnega sevanja in zmanjšalo vpliv tople grede/podnebnih sprememb.
This will protect us more against the destructive effects of too much UV-radiation, and decrease the greenhouse effect/climate change.
Predmet: Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč (prenovitev)
Subject : Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on substances that deplete the ozone layer (recast)
Potem ko je Odbor za pravne zadeve 15. decembra 2008 na seji proučil zadevo in o njej glasoval s 13 glasovi za
In conclusion, after discussing it at its meeting of 15 December 2008, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 13 votes in favour
Prisotni so bili naslednji poslanci: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Bert Doorn, Othmar Karas, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Manuel Medina Ortega, Diana Wallis, Monica Frassoni, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Georgios Papastamkos, Costas Botopoulos, Ieke van den Burg, Eva Lichtenberger. in brez vzdržanih glasov, vašemu odboru kot pristojnemu odboru priporoča, naj predlog prouči ob upoštevanju njegovih predlogov in v skladu s členom 80a.
The following Members were present: Giuseppe Gargani (Chairman), Bert Doorn, Othmar Karas, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Manuel Medina Ortega, Diana Wallis, Monica Frassoni, Francesco Enrico Speroni,, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Georgios Papastamkos, Costas Botopoulos, Ieke van den Burg, Eva Lichtenberger. and no abstentions, recommends that your Committee, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in keeping with its suggestions and in accordance with Rule 80a.
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč (prenovitev)
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on substances that deplete the ozone layer
KOM(2008) 505 končno z dne 1.8.2008 – 2008/0165 (COD)
COM(2008) 505 final of 1.8.2008 - 2008/0165 (COD)
Posvetovalna delovna skupina, sestavljena iz predstavnikov pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, se je ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov in zlasti točke 9 sestala 1., 2., 8., 9. in 16. oktobra 2008, da bi preučila omenjeni predlog Komisije.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 1, 2, 8, 9 and 16 October 2008 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna skupina je na teh srečanjih
At those meetings
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna različica obravnavanega besedila. preučila predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenovitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. junija 2000 o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč, in v medsebojnem soglasju prišla do naslednjih sklepov.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
Glede obrazložitvenega memoranduma, da bi bil oblikovan ob polnem upoštevanju zahtev, navedenih v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, mora takšen dokument natančno navesti, katere določbe prejšnjega akta ostanejo v predlogu nespremenjene, kot določa točka 6(a)(iii) sporazuma.
As regards the explanatory memorandum, in order to be drafted in full compliance with the relevant requirements laid down by the Inter-institutional Agreement such a document should have specified which provisions of the earlier act remain unchanged in the proposal, as is provided for under point 6(a)(iii) of that agreement.
2) Naslednji deli besedila prenovljenega predloga bi morali biti osenčeni s sivo barvo za označitev bistvenih sprememb:
2) The following parts of text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes:
– v prvi navedbi sklicevanje na člen 133 ES;
- in the first citation, the reference made to Article 133 EC;
– v uvodni izjavi 9 in členu 10(2) besedi „ laboratorijske in analitske “, ki se pojavljata med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in recital 9 and in Article 10(2), the words " laboratory and analytical ", which have been presented between adaptation arrows;
– v uvodni izjavi 11 besede „ od leta 2005 do leta 2008 “, ki so vključene v besedilu, ki se pojavlja med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in recital 11, the words " from 2005 to 2008 ", which are comprised in a wording presented between adaptation arrows;
– v členu 2(1) besede „ nadzorovane snovi, nove snovi ter “, ki se pojavljajo med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 2(1), the words " controlled substances, to new substances and ", presented between adaptation arrows;
– v členu 3(1) besede „ ali organizacije za regionalno gospodarsko povezovanje “, ki so že prečrtane z dvojno črto;
- in Article 3(1), the words " or regional economic integration organisation ", which have already been marked with double strikethrough;
– v členu 3(21) besedi „ ali predeluje “, ki se pojavljajo med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 3(21), the words " or reclaims ", which have been presented between adaptation arrows;
– v prvem pododstavku člena 8(4) dodatek besede „ lahko ", ki se pojavlja med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 8(4), first subparagraph, the replacing of the word " shall " (having been marked with double strikethrough) with the word " may " (having been presented between adaptation arrows);
– v besedilu člena 7(a) uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000, ki je v celoti prečrtano z dvojno črto in se pojavlja v prenovljenem besedilu med besedilom drugega pododstavka uvodnega dela člena 16(1) in besedilom člena 16(1)(a), besedi „ in VIII “;
- in the wording of Article 7(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000, having been entirely marked with double strikethrough and appearing in the recast text between the wording of Article 16(1), second subparagraph, introductory words, and that of Article 16(1)(a), the words " and VIII ";
– v členu 16(1)(a) besede „ laboratorijske in analitske “ in „ iz člena 10 “, ki se pojavljajo med puščicami za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 16(1)(a), the words " laboratory and analytical " and " referred to in Article 10 ", which have been presented between adaptation arrows;
– celotno besedilo člena 7(d), ki je bilo prečrtano z dvojno črto in se pojavlja v prenovljenem besedilu tik za členom 16(1)(c);
- the entire wording of Article 7(d), having been marked with double strikethrough and appearing in the recast text immediately after Article 16(1)(c);
– v členih 17(2)(a), 27(2)(d) in 27(3)(a) besede „ ali nujne uporabe “, ki so že prečrtane z dvojno črto;
- in Article 17(2)(a), in Article 27(2)(d) and in Article 27(3)(a), the words " or critical " (already marked with double strikethrough);
– v členu 17(2) )(e) se številka člena „ 7(b) “ (prečrtana z dvojno črto) nadomesti s „ 15(2)(d) in (e) “ (ki se pojavlja med puščicama za označevanje sprememb);
- in Article 17(2)(e), the replacing of the article number " 7(b) " (having been marked with double strikethrough) with " 15(2) point (d) and (e) " (having been presented between adaptation arrows);
– v členu 17(4) besede „ iz točk (a) do (d) odstavka 2 “, ki se pojavljajo med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 17(4), the words " referred to in points (a) to (d) of paragraph 2 ", presented between adaptation arrows;
– v členu 17(5) besede „ iz točk (e) do (g) odstavkov 2 in 3 “, ki se pojavljajo med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 17(5), the words " referred to in points (e) to (g) of paragraph 2 and in paragraph 3 ", presented between adaptation arrows;
– v členu 18(5) besedi „ ali sestavo “, ki se pojavljata med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 18(5), the words " or composition ", presented between adaptation arrows;
– v členu 20(3) besede „ ali so od njih odvisni “, ki ju vsebuje besedilo, ki se pojavlja med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 20(3), the words " or relying on ", which are comprised in a wording presented between adaptation arrows;
– v členu 22(4) besede „ laboratorijsko in analitsko “, ki se pojavljajo med puščicama za označevanje sprememb;
- in Article 22(4), the words " laboratory and analytical ", which have been presented between adaptation arrows;
– celotno besedilo člena 16(7) uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000, ki je prečrtano z dvojno črto in se pojavlja v prenovljenem predlogu tik za besedilom člena 22;
- the entire wording of Article 16(7) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000, having been marked with double strikethrough and appearing in the recast proposal immediately after the text of Article 22;
– celotno besedilo druge alinee člena 19(1)(b) uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000, ki je prečrtano z dvojno črto in se pojavlja v prenovljenem besedilu med besedilom člena 27(3)(a) in besedilom člena 27(3)(b);
- the entire wording of Article 19(1)(b), second indent, of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000, having been marked with double strikethrough and appearing in the recast text between the wording of Article 27(3)(a) and that of Article 27(3)(b);
– v členu 27(4)(a) besede „ vključno s snovmi, ki se ponovno izvozijo po postopku uvoza na oplemenitenje “, ki so prečrtane z dvojno črto;
- in Article 27(4)(a), the words " including substances which are re-exported under the inward processing procedure ", having been marked with double strikethrough;
– v drugem pododstavku člena 31 datum začetka veljavnosti „ 1. januarja 2010 “, ki se pojavlja med puščicama za označevanje sprememb.
- in Article 31, second subparagraph, the date of entry into force " 1 January 2010 ", which was presented between adaptation arrows.
4) V drugem pododstavku člena 12(2) bi se morale navedbe let " 1996, 1997 in 1998 " nadomestiti z navedbo " 2005 do 2008 ", ki bi morala biti označena s sivo osenčeno pisavo.
4) In Article 12(2), second subparagraph, the indication of the years " 1996, 1997 and 1998 " should have been replaced by the indication " 2005 to 2008 ", which should have been identified with grey shaded type.
5) V členu 18(4) bi se sklicevanje na " po odstavku 2 " moralo brati kot sklicevanje " po odstavku 3 ".
5) In Article 18(4), the reference made to " paragraph 2 " should read as a reference made to " paragraph 3 ".
6) V členu 27(2)(c) in členu 27(3)(a) bi se sklicevanje na „ člen 10(5) " moralo brati kot sklicevanje na „ člen 10(6) “.
6) In Article 27(2)(c) and in Article 27(3)(a), the reference made to " Article 10(5) " should read as a reference made to " Article 10(6) ".
7) V členu 27(2)(d) bi se sklicevanje na " člen 10(7) " moralo brati kot sklicevanje na " člen 10(8) ".
7) In Article 27(2)(d), the reference made to " Article 10(7) " should read as a reference made to " Article 10(8) ".
8) V členu 27(8) bi se sklicevanje na „ člen 18(2)(vii) “ moralo brati kot sklicevanje na „ člen 18(3)(d) “.
8) In Article 27(8), the reference made to " Article 18(2)(vii) " should read as a reference made to " Article 18(3)(d) ".
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč ( KOM(2008)0505 – C6 – 2008/0165(COD) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on substances that deplete the ozone layer (recast) ( COM(2008)0505 – 2008/0165 (COD))
23. decembra 2008 je bil Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor določen, da v skladu s členom 80a poslovnika
On 23 September 2008 the abovementioned proposal for recasting was referred to the Committee on Legal affairs, as the committee responsible for opinion, pursuant to Rule 80a of the Rules of Procedure
Pravni akt, ki se ponovno sprejme, pomeni sprejem novega pravnega akta, ki v enotnem besedilu vključuje hkrati bistvene spremembe k prejšnjemu aktu in njegove nespremenjene določbe.
Recasting consists in the adoption of a new legal act which incorporates in a single text both the substantive amendments which it makes to an earlier act and the unchanged provisions of that act.
Novi pravni akt nadomesti in razveljavi dosedanji akt.
The new legal act replaces and repeals the earlier act.
Novi pravni akt urejata medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 28. novembra 2001 (UL C 77, 28.3.2002, str.
It is governed by the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 (OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
Odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve, na podlagi načinov, dogovorjenih na medinstitucionalni ravni, pregleda predlog, da ugotovi, ali ta ne vsebuje vsebinskih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v predlogu opredeljene kot take.
The committee responsible for legal affairs shall examine the proposal in accordance with the arrangements agreed at interinstitutional level with a view to checking that it entails no substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal.
Vendar lahko predloge sprememb za dele, ki ostajajo nespremenjeni, izjemoma sprejme posamično predsednik tega odbora, če meni, da to zahtevata nujna skladnost besedila ali povezanost z drugimi dopustnimi predlogi sprememb.
However, amendments to the parts which have remained unchanged may be admitted by way of exception and on a case-by-case basis by the chair of the above committee if he or she considers that this is necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text or because the amendments are inextricably linked to other admissible amendments.
Če Komisija svojega predloga ne umakne, Parlament zadevo vrne pristojnemu odboru, ki jo pregleda po običajnem postopku.“ poda mnenje o zgoraj omenjenem predlogu za ponovni sprejem pravnega akta.
If the Commission does not withdraw its proposal, Parliament shall refer the matter back to the committee responsible for the subject matter, which shall consider it in accordance with the normal procedure." .
Na podlagi mnenja pravne službe, katere predstavniki so se udeležili sestankov posvetovalne delovne skupine za proučitev prenovljenega predloga, in v skladu s priporočili pripravljavca mnenja Odbor za pravne zadeve meni, da zadevni predlog ne vključuje vsebinskih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v zadevnem predlogu ali v mnenju pravne službe opredeljene kot take, in da je predlog, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih aktov z omenjenimi spremembami, zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb.
Following the opinion of the Legal Service, whose representatives participated in the meetings of the Consultative Working Party examining the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the draftsperson, the Committee on Legal Affairs considered that the proposal in question did not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal or in the opinion of the Working Party and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those changes, the proposal contained a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Poleg tega je skladu s členom 80a(2) in členom 80(3) Odbor za pravne zadeve ugotovil, da so tehnične prilagoditve, ki jih je v svojem mnenju predlagala zgoraj omenjena delovna skupina, potrebne za zagotavljanje skladnosti predloga s pravili prenovitve.
Furthermore, pursuant to Rules 80a(2) and 80(3), the Committee on Legal Affairs considered that the technical adaptations suggested in the opinion of the abovementioned Working Party were necessary in order to ensure that the proposal complied with the recasting rules.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je po tem, ko je na seji 15. decembra 2008 proučil zadevo in o njej glasoval s 13 glasovi za
After discussing it at its meeting of 15 December 2008, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 13 votes in favour
Prisotni so bili naslednji poslanci: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Bert Doorn, Othmar Karas, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Manuel Medina Ortega, Diana Wallis, Monica Frassoni, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Georgios Papastamkos, Costas Botopoulos, Ieke van den Burg, Eva Lichtenberger. in brez vzdržanih glasov, Odboru za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojnemu odboru priporočil, naj omenjeni predlog prouči ob upoštevanju njegovih predlogov in v skladu s členom 80a.
The following Members were present: Giuseppe Gargani (Chairman), Bert Doorn, Othmar Karas, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Manuel Medina Ortega, Diana Wallis, Monica Frassoni, Francesco Enrico Speroni,, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Georgios Papastamkos, Costas Botopoulos, Ieke van den Burg, Eva Lichtenberger. and no abstentions, recommended that the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in keeping with its suggestions and in accordance with Rule 80a.
V pismu z dne 23. septembra 2008 ste Odbor za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika zaprosili za mnenje o ustreznosti pravne podlage zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 23 September 2008 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2) to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid.
Odbor je vprašanje obravnaval na seji dne 12. februarja 2009.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 12 February 2009.
Obravnavana pravna podlaga:
The legal bases under consideration :
Člen 175(1) Pogodbe ES se glasi:
Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty reads as follows:
Člen 174 Pogodbe ES določa cilje okoljske politike Skupnosti. .
Article 174 of the EC Treaty sets the objectives of the Community policy on the environment. . "
Člen 133(1) Pogodbe ES se glasi:
Article 133 of the EC Treaty reads as follows:
Komisija vodi pogajanja ob posvetovanju s posebnim odborom, ki ga Svet imenuje za pomoč Komisiji pri izvajanju te naloge, in v okviru navodil, ki jih Svet lahko naslovi nanjo.
The Commission shall conduct these negotiations in consultation with a special committee appointed by the Council to assist the Commission in this task and within the framework of such directives as the Council may issue to it.