natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E. ker je treba poudariti, da na podlagi nacionalnih strateških poročil za leto 2009 in strateškega poročila Komisije za leto 2010 v zvezi s kohezijsko politiko in izvajanjem programov 2007–2013 kaže, da so države članice precej različno uporabljale instrumente, sredstva in metode za spodbujanje kohezijske politike, ki jih je za boj proti krizi in povečanje dejanskih odhodkov predlagala Komisija, kot so spremembe strateških smernic, osi in financiranje operativnih programov ter odziv na poenostavitev izvedbenih postopkov,
E. stressing the fact that, based on the National Strategic Reports for 2009, and the Strategic Report 2010 of the Commission regarding cohesion policy and the implementation of the programmes 2007-2013, the Member States appear to have made rather different uses of the instruments, means and methods for facilitating cohesion policy proposed by the Commission to combat the crisis and increase actual expenditure, such as changes to the strategic guidelines, the axes and financing for the operational programmes and the response to the simplification of implementing procedures,
F. ker je treba poudariti, da je Komisija od oktobra 2008 predlagala vrsto ukrepov za pospešitev izvajanja programov v okviru kohezijske politike 2007–2013, da bi z vsemi svojimi viri in sredstvi zagotovila takojšnjo in učinkovito podporo prizadevanjem za okrevanje na nacionalni in regionalni ravni,
F. stressing that from October 2008 onwards the Commission proposed a series of measures aimed at speeding up implementation of programmes under the cohesion policy 2007-2013 in order to mobilise all its resources and means to provide immediate and effective support for recovery efforts at national and regional level,
G. ker je strategija Komisije za pospeševanje naložb in poenostavitev programov kohezijske politike prek priporočil državam članicam ter zakonodajnih ali nezakonodajnih ukrepov zasnovana na treh oseh: (a) večji prožnosti za kohezijske programe, (b) dajanju prednosti regijam in (c) premišljenim naložbam za kohezijske programe; ker je treba v letu 2010 od 64,3 milijarde EUR za zaposlovanje in konkurenčnost uporabiti 49,4 milijarde EUR za kohezijo (2-odstotno povečanje glede na leto 2009) ter 14,9 milijarde EUR za konkurenčnost (7,9-odstotno povečanje glede na leto 2009),
G. whereas the Commission strategy to accelerate investment and simplify cohesion policy programmes through recommendations to the Member States and legislative or non-legislative measures is built around three axes: (a) greater flexibility for cohesion programmes, (b) giving the regions a head start, and (c) smart investment for cohesion programmes; whereas for 2010, of the EUR 64.3 billion earmarked for employment and competitiveness, EUR 49.4 billion are to be used for cohesion (an increase of 2% over 2009) and EUR 14.9 billion for competitiveness (an increase of 7.9% over 2009),
2. ugotavlja, da so strukturni skladi močan instrument, namenjen pomoči regijam pri ekonomskem in socialnem prestrukturiranju ter spodbujanju ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije, pa tudi instrument za izvajanje evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, zlasti za povečanje konkurenčnosti in ustvarjanje delovnih mest, tako da se podpira njihova sistematična in učinkovita uporaba; poudarja, da se cilj konkurenčnosti ne sme uresničevati na škodo sodelovanja in solidarnosti med regijami;
Notes that the Structural Funds are powerful instruments, designed for helping the regions in their economic and social restructuring and in promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion, as well as for implementation of the European Economic Recovery Plan and, in particular, development of competitiveness and job creation, by supporting their systematic and effective use; stresses that the aim of competitiveness cannot be attained to the detriment of cooperation and solidarity between regions;
5. zaskrbljeno ugotavlja, da je imela kriza za regije iz cilja 2 negativne socialne posledice, ki se kažejo v povišanju brezposelnosti, revščine in socialne izključenosti in so prizadele najbolj ranljive socialne skupine (brezposelne, ženske, starejše), ter poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme pobude za podporo za mala in srednja podjetja, da zagotovi trajnost obstoječih in ustvarjanje čim več novih delovnih mest;
Notes with concern the negative social consequences that have been brought about by the crisis in Objective 2 regions, with an increase in unemployment, poverty and social exclusion and harm to the most vulnerable social groups (the unemployed, women, the elderly), and calls on the Commission to take initiatives to support SMEs in securing the viability of existing jobs and creating, where possible, more new jobs;
7. poudarja, da je zmanjšan prispevek nacionalnega sofinanciranja k programom zaradi velikih finančnih težav številnih držav članic velika težava, ki vpliva tudi na cilj 2, ter podpira politiko Komisije glede možnosti uporabe pomoči Skupnosti; zato meni, da je treba čim prej izvajati Uredbo št. 1083/2006 v njeni sedanji obliki, kot jo je sprejel Parlament; meni, da je 100-odstotno financiranje pretirano, saj zavira spodbudo za države članice, naj z nacionalnim sofinanciranjem zagotovijo uspešnost in stroškovno učinkovitost spodbujanih ukrepov, in se strinja z oceno Sveta, ki zavrača tako imenovano predhodno financiranje v predloženi različici;
Underlines the significant problem posed by the reduction in the contribution of national co-financing to programmes, which also has implications for Objective 2 owing to the major financial problems of many Member States, and supports Commission policy regarding the use of the Community contribution; considers it necessary, therefore, for the amendment of Regulation 1083/2006 in its present form, as adopted by Parliament, to be speedily implemented, considers 100% financing to be excessive, since it takes away the incentive for the Member States to ensure that the measures supported are effective and efficient through national co-financing, and concurs with the view taken by the Council in rejecting ‘frontloading’ as its stands;
10. podpira predlog Sveta, da se predplačila za leto 2010 zvišajo za 4 % pri Evropskem socialnem skladu in za 2 % pri kohezijskem skladu, vendar le za države članice, katerih upad BDP je bil več kot dvomesten ali ki so prejele pomoč za plačilno bilanco Mednarodnega denarnega sklada; poziva Komisijo, naj razišče vzroke za zamude pri izvajanju in poišče prožne rešitve za pravili n+2/n+3, da sredstva držav članic ne bodo zgubljena;
Supports the Council’s proposal to increase advances for 2010 by 4% in the case of the ESF and by 2% in the case of the Cohesion Fund, but only for Member States whose GDP has fallen by more than two digits or which have received IMF balance-of-payments support; calls on the Commission to study the causes of the delays in implementation and to find flexible solutions for the n+2/n+3 rules, so that funds are not forfeited to the Member States;
12. pozdravlja podporne ukrepe za podjetja v okviru kohezijske politike (približno 55 milijard EUR med letoma 2007 in 2013), med katerimi se večina nanaša na krepitev inovacij, prenos tehnologije in posodabljanje malih in srednjih podjetij; poudarja, da je pomembno spodbujati uspešne modele na tem področju, in razume, da morajo biti predlagani intervencijski ukrepi v korist podjetij usmerjeni v dolgoročne rezultate prestrukturiranja in prehoda na bolj vzdržno gospodarstvo, ne pa v nujne intervencije za njihovo ekonomsko preživetje, kar je pogosto nezdružljivo s politiko državne pomoči;
Welcomes the support measures for undertakings under the cohesion policy (approximately EUR 55 billion between 2007 and 2013), most of which relates to strengthening innovation, technology transfer and modernisation of SMEs, stresses the importance of promoting successful models in this area and understands that the proposed measures under the intervention in favour of undertakings must be targeted at their long-term restructuring outcomes and the transition to a more sustainable economy, and not at fire-fighting interventions for economic survival, which in many cases are incompatible with State aid policies;
22. vztraja, da je mogoče ob upoštevanju ciljev kohezijske politike in učinkov cikličnih gospodarskih sprememb na javne finance in zasebne naložbe v posebnih okoliščinah (kot je gospodarska kriza) izjemoma zahtevati večjo prožnost pravila N+2;
Insists that in special circumstances (such as the economic crisis) greater flexibility can be exceptionally required in the N+2 rule in view of the objectives pursued by the cohesion policy and the effects of cyclical economic changes on public finances and private investment;
26. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in državam članicam.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Member States.
Regionalna politika EU zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize ter upočasnjene gospodarske rasti v Evropi odločilno prispeva k načrtu oživitev gospodarstva, saj je glavni vir vlaganj Skupnosti v realno gospodarstvo in zagotavlja občutno podporo javnim naložbam, tudi na regionalni in lokalni ravni.
In the context of the global financial and economic crisis and the economic slowdown in Europe, EU regional policy makes a decisive contribution to the Economic Recovery Plan, constituting the main Community source of investment in the real economy and providing notable support for public investment, including at regional and local level.
Ker v EU ni učinkovitega mehanizma za gospodarsko usklajevanje in uravnoteženo rast, je kohezijska politika s strukturnimi skladi in drugimi dejavnostmi izjemno pomembna.
Given the EU’s lack of effective mechanisms for economic coordination and balanced growth, cohesion policy, through the Structural Funds and other actions, is of prime importance.
Regionalna politika ni samo sredstvo za takojšnjo ublažitev negativnih gospodarskih in socialnih učinkov krize, ampak je tudi dolgoročna politika za reševanje strukturnih težav, ki so se pokazale in nastajajo zaradi krize, zlasti s konkurenčnostjo in zaposlovanjem iz cilja 2 držav članic.
Regional policy is not only a way to immediately ‘damp down’ the negative economic and social effects of the crisis but is also a long-term policy for combating the structural problems revealed and created against the background of the crisis, particularly as regards competitiveness and employment in the Objective 2 Member States.
To poročilo je osredotočeno na ukrepe za izvedbo obeh glavnih stebrov evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, zlasti stebra konkurenčnosti, z dosledno in učinkovito uporabo odobritev in pripadajočih sredstev.
This report focuses on actions to implement the two main pillars of the European Economic Recovery Plan, in particular the competitiveness pillar, through systematic and effective use of appropriations and the means corresponding to them.
Gospodarska kriza ter regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje
The economic crisis and ‘regional competitiveness and employment’
Cilj 2 je bil in ostaja eden najpomembnejših stebrov kohezijske politike in je danes zaradi izhoda iz gospodarske krize še posebej pomemben za povečanje konkurenčnosti evropskih regij in njihove pripravljenosti na rast v času po krizi.
Objective 2 has been and remains one of the most important pillars of cohesion policy and takes on particular significance today, in the context of exiting the economic crisis, for increasing the competitiveness of the European regions and their readiness for growth in the post-crisis era.
V obdobju 2000–2006 je bil cilj 2 povezan s podporo za ekonomsko in socialno preobrazbo območij, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, in namenjen 15,2 % Evropejcev (na območjih cilja 2 je živelo približno 69,8 milijonov prebivalcev).
In the period 2000-2006, Objective 2, which related to support for the economic and social conversion of areas lagging behind in their development, was aimed at 15.2% of Europeans (around 69.8 million inhabitants lived in Objective 2 areas).
Prejeli so znesek v skupni višini 22,5 milijarde EUR (9,6 % skupnih sredstev) in po izračunih je bilo bruto ustvarjenih 730.000 novih delovnih mest.
They benefited from total financing of EUR 22.5 billion (9.6% of overall resources), while it is calculated that 730 000 gross jobs have been created.
Te regije je mogoče razvrstiti v: (a) industrijska območja (8,5 %) s stopnjami brezposelnosti nad povprečjem v Skupnosti, večjo zaposlenostjo v industriji kot znaša povprečje v Skupnosti in stalnim upadom, b) podeželska območja (5,2 %) z gostoto prebivalstva, nižjo od 100 prebivalcev/km2, več kot enkrat višjo stopnjo zaposlenosti v kmetijskem sektorju kot v povprečju v Skupnosti, stopnjo brezposelnosti nad povprečjem v Skupnosti in stalnim upadom prebivalstva, c) mestna območja (1,9 %) z dolgotrajno brezposelnostjo nad povprečjem v Skupnosti, višjo stopnjo revščine, posebej nespodbudnim socialnim okoljem, visoko stopnjo kriminala in nizko stopnjo izobrazbe, d) ribiška območja (0,3 %) in e) mešana območja (2,1 %).
These regions may be classed as: (a) industrial areas (8.5%) with unemployment rates higher than the Community average, with industrial employment greater than the Community average and in steady decline, (b) rural areas (5.2%) with a population density of fewer than 100 inhabitants per square kilometre, with an employment rate in the rural sector more than double the Community average, with an unemployment rate higher than the Community average and with a steadily declining population, (c) urban areas (1.9%) with long-term unemployment greater than the Community average, with a high level of poverty, with a particularly damaged social environment, with a high crime rate, with low educational performance, (d) fisheries areas (0.3%), (e) mixed areas (2.1%).
Od reforme v letu 2006 je cilj 2 zdaj povezan s krepitvijo regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanjem v skupno 168 regijah v 19 državah članicah (gl. prilogo I), kar pomeni 314 milijonov prebivalcev in skupna finančna sredstva v višini 54,7 milijarde EUR za obdobje 2007–2013 (skoraj 16 % skupnih sredstev).
With the 2006 reform, Objective 2 now relates to strengthening regional competitiveness and employment in a total of 168 regions in 19 Member States (see Annex I), i.e. 314 million inhabitants, with total financing for 2007-2013 of EUR 54.7 billion (almost 16% of overall resources).
Zato je izredno pomembno, da se cilj 2 v celoti izkoristi in da v celoti prispeva k skupni strategiji za oživitev našega gospodarstva ter k njegovi konkurenčnosti.
It is therefore important for Objective 2 to be fully exploited and to make a full contribution to the overall strategy for our economies’ recovery, as well as to their competitiveness.
Še posebej pomembno je, da se približno 73,7 % tega zneska nameni za izboljšanje znanja in inovacij (33,7 %) ter številčnejša in boljša delovna mesta (40 %).
It is particularly important that around 73.7% of this amount is earmarked for (a) improving knowledge and innovation (33.7%), and (b) more and better jobs (40%).
Ustrezni odstotek je bistveno nižji pri regijah iz cilja 1, saj znaša samo 40 %, čeprav je v absolutnem znesku zaradi velikih potreb zadevnih regij bistveno višji.
The corresponding percentage for Objective 1 regions is markedly lower, just 40%, even though, in absolute figures, it is significantly higher due to the greater needs of the areas in question (see Annex II).
Zadnje poročilo Komisije o napredku na področju gospodarske in socialne kohezije kaže, da je večina kazalnikov v regijah iz cilja 2 pred gospodarsko krizo pokazala zelo dobre rezultate, na primer pri zaposlovanju, inovacijah, raziskavah in razvoju, intenzivnosti človeškega kapitala, izobraževanju in usposabljanju ter vseživljenjskemu učenju, medtem ko so bili pri drugih kazalnikih, kot so povečane neposredne tuje naložbe in produktivnost, višji v konvergenčnih regijah (gl. prilogo III).
The latest progress report from the Commission on economic and social cohesion shows that most indicators in the Objective 2 regions recorded high performance levels before the economic crisis, such as employment, innovation, research and development (R&D), human capital intensity, education and training and lifelong learning, while for others, such as increased foreign direct investment (FDI) and productivity, the convergence regions show higher performance levels (see Annex III).
Tako je na primer BDP na prebivalca pred krizo, med letoma 2000 in 2006, v primerjavi s povprečjem v EU porasel za skupno šest točk, s čimer v konvergenčnih regijah s stopnjo 59 % za štiri odstotne točke odstopa od povprečja v EU, vendar je ostal še precej pod spodnjo mejo 75 %.
By way of example, before the crisis, between 2000 and 2006,GDP per head relative to the EU average increased by six points overall, bringing the convergence regions within four percentage points of the EU average, at 59%, closer to but still well below the minimum threshold of 75%.
Regije konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja (cilj 2), ki s 122 % sicer precej prednjačijo pred drugimi, pa so v obdobju 2000–2006 doživele 4,4-odstoten upad.
The competitiveness and employment regions (Objective 2), while they are quite a way ahead of the others at 122%, nevertheless experienced a drop of 4.4% in the 2000-2006 period.
Velik porast produktivnosti v konvergenčnih regijah je glavni razlog za močan upad razlike v BDP na prebivalca (gl. prilogo IV).
The large rise in productivity of the convergence regions is the main reason why the difference in per capita GDP has significantly decreased (see Annex IV).
Od leta 2000 se v konvergenčnih regijah kaže 2-odstotno letno povečanje produktivnosti v industriji in storitvah, dvakratni odstotek pa v regijah konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja iz cilja 2.
From 2000 onwards productivity in industry and services shows a 2% annual increase in the convergence regions, double the percentage in the competitiveness and employment regions under Objective 2.
K povečanju je pripomogla pomoč za izobraževanje, boljša in širša uporaba informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije ter večji priliv neposrednih tujih naložb.
This increase has been supported by assistance for education, better and wider use of ICT and high inflow of foreign direct investment.
Hkrati je še vedno veliko razlik v izobraževalnih standardih med regijami.
At the same time, there are still major disparities in educational standards between regions.
Delež diplomantov je skoraj za 9 % višji v regijah iz cilja 2 kot v konvergenčnih regijah.
The proportion of graduates is almost 9% higher in the Objective 2 regions than in the convergence regions.
Tudi udeležba v vseživljenjskem učenju v konvergenčnih regijah močno zaostaja, saj je tam delež pol manjši kot v regijah iz cilja 2.
Also, participation in lifelong learning lags behind significantly in the convergence regions, where the proportion is half that in the Objective 2 regions.
S finančno in gospodarsko krizo so prišle do izraza slabosti evropskih konvergenčnih območij in strukturne pomanjkljivosti evropskih regij, zlasti glede konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja.
The financial and economic crisis highlights the weaknesses of the European convergence areas and the structural disadvantages, particularly as regards competitiveness and employment, of the European regions.
Glede na najnovejše napovedi Komisije (2009-2011) bodo razmere na trgu dela še naprej neugodne, stopnja nezaposlenosti v Evropski uniji pa bo predvidoma dosegla 10,25 %, saj je bilo leta 2009 izgubljenih 2,25 % delovnih mest, leta 2010 pa jih bo manj še za 1,25 %.
Based on the latest Commission forecasts (2009-2011), the situation in the labour market will remain unfavourable and the unemployment rate is expected to reach 10.25% in the EU, with the loss of 2.25% of jobs for 2009 and 1.25% for 2010.
Zaradi svojega vpliva na najpomembnejše gospodarske sektorje ima kriza v sedanjem obdobju tudi naslednje posledice: (a) porast novih naročil in zaupanja ter izboljšanje slike stanja v industriji EU, ki vodi k stabilizaciji industrijske proizvodnje, vendar brez vidnejšega okrevanja, ker je njena stopnja za 20 % nižja kot na začetku leta 2008 (gl. prilogo IV), b) nadaljnji upad dejavnosti v proizvodnem sektorju in c) nadaljnje težave za majhna in srednja podjetja pri dostopu do mikrokreditov ali finančnih sredstev.
The crisis, with its impact in the key sectors of the economy, has the following consequences in the current period also: (a) an increase in new orders and confidence and an improvement in the EU industrial picture, leading to stabilisation of industrial production but without a dramatic recovery, i.e. at a rate 20% lower than at the start of 2008 (see Annex IV), (b) continued decline in activities in the manufacturing sector, and (c) continued difficulty for SMEs in accessing micro-credit/financing.
Večje finančne težave mnogih držav članic (velik javni dolg, velik proračunski primanjkljaj) so tudi zaviralni dejavnik in omejujejo prispevek nacionalnega sofinanciranja programov, povezanih s ciljem 2.
The major financial problems of many Member States (high public debt, high budget deficit) are also an inhibiting factor and a constraint on the contribution of national co-financing to programmes relating to Objective 2.
Na tej stopnji žal še ni zbranih dovolj kvalitativnih in kvantitativnih podatkov o kratkoročnih in dolgoročnih učinkih finančne in gospodarske krize v regijah EU ter oblikovanju najpomembnejših gospodarskih in socialnih kazalnikov.
Unfortunately, at this stage there is a lack of aggregated qualitative and quantitative data on the short-term and long-term impact of the financial and economic crisis in the EU regions and the shaping of the most significant economic and social indicators.
Poročevalka meni, da bi morala Komisija zaradi izrazito negativnega učinka finančne in gospodarske krize na zaposlovanje in konkurenčnost predložiti posebno poročilo ali študijo o njenih posledicah v regijah EU, zlasti tistih iz cilja 2.
The rapporteur takes the view that the Commission should present a special report/study on the consequences of the financial and economic crisis in the EU regions, in particular the Objective 2 regions, given its particularly negative impact on employment and competitiveness.
Prispevek regionalne politike k boju proti gospodarski krizi v okviru cilja 2
Contribution of regional policy to fighting the economic crisis within the framework of Objective 2
Od oktobra 2008 je Komisija predlagala vrsto ukrepov za pospešitev izvajanja programov kohezijske politike 2007–2013, da bi združila vse svoje vire in sredstva za zagotovitev takojšnje in učinkovite podpore nacionalnim in regionalnim prizadevanjem za okrevanje.
From October 2008 the Commission proposed a series of measures aimed at speeding up implementation of programmes under the cohesion policy 2007-2013, in order to mobilise all its resources and means to provide immediate and effective support for recovery efforts at national and regional level.
V skladu s kohezijsko politiko je približno 55 milijard EUR namenjenih za podporo podjetjem (med letoma 2007 in 2013), večina teh sredstev pa bo razdeljena za krepitev inovacij v malih in srednjih podjetjih.
Under the cohesion policy around EUR 55 billion are earmarked (between 2007 and 2013) to support undertakings, most of which concerns strengthening innovation by SMEs.
Številne načrtovane dejavnosti so namenjene predvsem za reševanje najnujnejših vprašanj, kot so trenutne gospodarske razmere in zlasti osredotočanje na pomembne izzive, s katerimi se srečujejo podjetja v realnem gospodarstvu, vendar pa so predlagani ukrepi, ki so del posegov v korist podjetij, usmerjeni tudi v dolgoročne rezultate pri reševanju strukturnih težav in ne na trenutne reševalne akcije za ekonomsko preživetje, ki so potencialno nezdružljive s politiko državne pomoči.
Many of the programmed activities match more immediate needs to deal with the current economic situation and focus, in particular, on significant challenges faced by undertakings in the real economy, but the proposed measures under interventions in favour of undertakings are targeted at long-term results from tackling structural problems and not at fire-fighting interventions for economic survival, which are potentially incompatible with State aid policies.