natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta člen bi tako uporabljali samo v primerih, ko posebne določbe nove direktive ne bi zadostovale za zaščito varnostnih interesov držav članic.
Article 296 TEC would then only apply in those cases when the special provisions of the new directive are not sufficient to safeguard the Member States' security interests.
Poročevalec se strinja s cilji predloga direktive.
Your rapporteur endorses the aims of the proposal for a directive.
Na podlagi resolucije o zeleni knjigi o javnih naročilih za obrambo
On the basis of the aims of the resolution on the Green Paper on Defence Procurement
Zaradi pogostega prekrivanja naročil na trgu orožja in varnosti se poročevalec strinja s Komisijo, da je treba v področje uporabe predloga direktive vključiti tako obrambo kot varnost.
In view of the frequent overlapping of procurement on the defence and security market, the rapporteur agrees with the Commission that both the defence and security fields should be included in the scope of the proposal for a directive.
Ker pa so vsa naročila, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive, povezana z občutljivimi informacijami, se predlaga, da bi ga v členu 1 enotno opredelili.
As, however, all contracts falling within its scope involve sensitive information, it is proposed that the scope be uniformly defined in Article 1.
Za odpravo težave, da seznam orožja, streliva in/ali vojaških sredstev iz leta 1958, s katerim je opredeljeno področje uporabe za naročila za obrambo, ni več aktualen, se predlaga, da bi sodobno razlago pripravili zlasti z uporabo skupnega seznama vojaškega blaga EU, ki bi ga posodobili vsako leto.
In order to do justice to the problem that the list of arms, munitions and/or war material of 1958, which defines the scope for defence contracts, is no longer up to date, it is proposed that a contemporary interpretation be provided by using, in particular, the EU's annually updated common military list.
Določba za odstopanja v skladu s členom 296(1)(a) Pogodbe ES je še vedno veljavna ne glede na predlog direktive, a je vključena v člen 9 predloga direktive v obliki, ki ustreza zakonu o javnih naročilih za boljšo pravno varnost in preprečitev zlorabe ali neprimerne uporabe člena 296 pogodbe.
The provision for derogation s pursuant to Article 296(1)(a) of the EC Treaty remains in force notwithstanding this proposal for a directive, but is incorporated in Article 9 of the proposal for a directive in a form appropriate to public procurement law in order to improve legal certainty and prevent abusive or avoidable application of Article 296 of the Treaty.
V zvezi z varnostjo informacij in zanesljivostjo oskrbe je za naročnika pomembno, da od ponudnikov prejme čim bolj zanesljive zaveze.
As regards security of information and supply , it is important to contracting authorities to obtain from tenderers commitments which are as reliable as possible.
Dokaza ali dokončne zaveze, zlasti glede ravnanja podizvajalca ali v zvezi z upravičenostjo do tranzita, pa ponudnik ne more dati v vsakem primeru.
However, a tenderer cannot in every case provide proof or a definitive commitment, particularly regarding the conduct of a subcontractor or in relation to a transit entitlement.
Zaradi tega so v osnutku poročila predlagane spremembe, ki bi ponudniku omogočile dejansko izpolnitev zahtev.
In the draft report, therefore, amendments are proposed which will make it easier for tenderers to comply with the requirements in practice.
Naslednji bistveni del osnutka poročila je uvedba revizijskega postopka.
A further essential element in the draft report is the introduction of a review procedure .
Namen je zagotoviti učinkovito pravno varstvo za zadevne ponudnike, spodbuditi preglednost in nediskriminacijo pri oddaji naročil in ter prispevati k pravi odprtosti trga.
This has the purpose of affording tenderers effective legal protection, promotes transparency and non-discrimination in the award of contracts, and thus contributes to genuine market opening.
Sistem pravnih sredstev tega predloga direktive se načeloma ravna po klasičnih pravnih smernicah, obenem pa so upoštevani posebni interesi držav članic glede oddaje javnih naročil na področju obrambe in varnosti.
The system of legal remedies provided for in this proposal for a directive basically adopts the same approach as the standard legal remedy directives, but at the same time takes account of the special interests of the Member States in relation to the award of defence and security contracts.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo nekaterih javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev na področju obrambe in varnosti
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts in the fields of defence and security
Mnenje odločno podpira vzpostavitev odprtega, preglednega in konkurenčnega evropskega trga za obrambno opremo (EDEM), ki bo služil evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki (EVOP) ter državam članicam.
The opinion strongly supports the establishment of an open, transparent and competitive European Defence Equipment Market (EDEM) at the service of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) and of the Member States.
Vzpostavitev obrambnega trga na evropski ravni bo izboljšala preglednost javnih naročil na področju obrambe v Uniji, imela za posledico boljšo opremo za naše vojake in civiliste v misijah v okviru evropske varnostne in obrambne politike, ter okrepila konkurenčnost evropske obrambne industrije in vodila k boljši porabi denarja davkoplačevalcev na področju varnosti in obrambe.
The creation of a defence market at European level will improve the transparency of defence procurement in the Union, result in better equipment for our soldiers and civilians in ESDP missions, enhance the competitiveness of the European defence industry and lead to better spending of taxpayers' money in the field of security and defence.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve in njegov pododbor za varnost in obrambo menita, da je predlagana direktiva korak v pravo smer.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) and its Subcommittee on Security and Defence (SEDE) believes that the proposed directive is a step in the right direction.
Predlagana direktiva obravnava posebni značaj javnih naročil na področju obrambe: naročniki lahko kot standardni postopek uporabijo postopek s pogajanji s predhodno objavo, od kandidatov lahko zahtevajo tudi spoštovanje posebnih klavzul o varovanju informacij (da se zagotovi varovanje zaupnosti občutljivih informacij) in klavzul o zanesljivosti oskrbe (s katerimi se zagotovi pravočasna dobava v primeru krize).
The proposed directive addresses the specific character of defence public procurement: awarding authorities may use the negotiated procedure with prior publication as a standard procedure, they may also require from candidates specific clauses for security of information (in order to ensure the confidentiality of sensitive information) and for security of supply ( in order to ensure on-time delivery in case of crisis).
Uporaba člena 296 bo omejena samo na resnično izredne primere, kot je določeno v Pogodbi in kot je odločilo Sodišče.
The use of Article 296 will be limited to truly exceptional cases, as stipulated by the Treaty and the Court.
To bo povečalo pravno varnost naročnikov.
This will enhance legal certainty for awarding authorities.
Nacionalna pravila za oddajo javnih naročil bodo usklajena, kar bo racionaliziralo mozaik pravil na tem področju in zmanjšalo upravne stroške industrij.
National procurement rules will be coordinated, which streamlines the regulatory patchwork in these fields and reduces industries' administrative costs.
Na obrambnih in varnostnih trgih se bodo izvajala načela Pogodbe, zlasti načela preglednosti, nediskriminacije in odprtosti.
The principles of the Treaty, in particular transparency, non-discrimination and openness will be implemented in defence and security markets.
To bo izboljšalo učinkovitost izdatkov za obrambo in vodilo k najboljšemu razmerju med ceno in kakovostjo.
This will improve the efficiency of defence spending and lead to better value for money.
Na ta način bodo imele sile, ki sodelujejo v operacijah v okviru evropske varnostne in obrambne politike, boljšo opremo.
This will bring better equipment for the forces participating in the operations launched under the framework of the European Security and Defence Policy.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve in njegov pododbor za varnost in obrambo predlagata sledeče konkretne spremembe, s katerimi bi se izboljšalo predlagano direktivo:
AFET and its Subcommittee on Security and Defence propose the following concrete changes aimed at improving the proposed directive:
a) področje uporabe predlagane direktive za oddajo javnih naročil na področju obrambe je določeno na podlagi seznama Sveta iz leta 1958 (Sklep o določitvi seznama proizvodov (orožje, strelivo in vojaška sredstva), za katere se uporabljajo določbe člena 223(1b), ki je postal člen 296 Pogodbe).
a) The scope of the proposed defence procurement directive is defined on the basis of the 1958 Council list (Decision defining the list of products -arms, munitions and war material- to which the provisions of Article 223(1b) -now Article 296- of the Treaty apply).
Ta seznam ni javni dokument EU in tako s pravnega vidika ni na razpolago.
This list is not an EU public document and hence unavailable as a matter of law.
Poleg tega pa seznam, ki je preveč obširen in splošen, vse od sprejetja pred 50. leti nikoli ni bil posodobljen.
Furthermore, the list, besides being too broad and general, has never been updated since its adoption 50 years ago.
b) Če bi morali uporabiti seznam Sveta iz leta 1958, bi to lahko naredili po pristanku Sveta, da seznam posodobi in ga objavi.
b) If the 1958 Council list were to be used, this should be done with the agreement by the Council to update the list and make it public.
c) Druga možnost bi lahko bila uporaba skupnega seznama vojaške opreme, ki ga zajema kodeks ravnanja Evropske unije glede izvoza orožja, ki ga je Svet sprejel 7. julija 2000 in ga le-ta tudi redno posodablja; seznam je tudi podlaga za področje uporabe predlagane direktive o poenostavitvi pogojev za prenose obrambnih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti (predlog spremembe k členu 1).
c) A possible alternative would be to use the Common Military List covered by the EU Code on Arms Exports adopted by the Council on 7 July 2000 and regularly updated by the Council, which is as well the basis for scope of the proposed directive on simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community (Amendment to Article 1).
d) Za okrepitev medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami in za upoštevanje posebnega značaja obrambnega trga je bistveno, da se države članice sporazumejo o skupni viziji varovanja informacij in zanesljivosti oskrbe, ter da se dovoli predpisani postopek s pogajanji s predhodno objavo, da se na ta način zadovolji potrebo po večji prožnosti pri oddaji pogodb na področju obrambe.
d) In order to reinforce mutual confidence among Member States and in order to take into account the specific character of the defence market, it is essential that Member States concur on a common vision on security of supply and on security of information, and that the prescribed negotiated procedure with prior publication is permitted, thus satisfying the requirement for more flexibility in the award of defence contracts.
e) Glede varovanja informacij pa bi odpiranje razdrobljenih nacionalnih obrambnih trgov, ki služijo evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki, zahtevalo, da naročniki in dobavitelji imajo ter priskrbijo zagotovilo, da bodo zaupne informacije v različnih fazah postopka za oddajo naročil zaščitene, ter da evropska obrambna podjetja ne bodo diskriminirana na podlagi varovanja informacij zaradi svoje narodnosti ali trajanja postopka za razkritje zaupnih informacij.
e) Concerning the security of information , opening up fragmented national defence markets in the service of the European Security and Defence Policy will require that contracting authorities and suppliers have and provide assurance that classified information will be protected during the different phases of the procurement procedure and that EU defence companies will not be discriminated on a security of information basis because of their nationality or the duration of the process of release of classified information.
Posledično bi bila predlagana direktiva naknadno dopolnjena z evropskim sistemom za varovanje informacij (predlog spremembe k členu 14).
As a result the proposed directive should be subsequently complemented by an EU system on security of information (Amendment to Article 14).
f) Glede zanesljivosti oskrbe bi odpiranje razdrobljenih nacionalnih obrambnih trgov, ki služijo evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki, zahtevalo, da naročniki imajo in priskrbijo zagotovilo, da imajo pri sklenitvi pogodbe z dobaviteljem pravico preveriti, da so in ostanejo ti dobavitelji zanesljiv in konkurenčen vir oskrbe.
f) Concerning the security of supply , opening up fragmented national defence markets in the service of the European Security and Defence Policy will require that contracting authorities have and provide assurance that when placing contracts with suppliers they are entitled to expect that these suppliers are and remain reliable and competitive sources of supply.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti izgradnji zaupanja med naročniki, zlasti v primeru neodložljive operativne nujnosti.
Special emphasis should be put on building-up confidence among contracting authorities in particular in circumstances of pressing operational urgency.
Predlagan je skupni režim primernih jamstev, podprt z možnostjo preverjanja, za stalno zanesljivost oskrbe.
A common regime of appropriate guarantees, backed up by verification possibilities, for a stable security of supply is proposed.
Člen lizbonske pogodbe glede medsebojne pomoči (člen 28A(7)
The mutual assistance article (article 28A.7
"Če je država članica žrtev oboroženega napada na svojem ozemlju, so ji druge države članice dolžne v skladu z 51. členom Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov zagotoviti pomoč in podporo z vsemi sredstvi, s katerimi razpolagajo…". ) bi postal zgolj ogrodje brez trdne zanesljivosti oskrbe med državami članicami (predlog spremembe k členu 15).
" If a Member Sate is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter...". ) of the Lisbon Treaty would become an empty shell without a solid security of supply between Member States (Amendment to Article 15).
g) Predlaga se, da Komisija za Evropski parlament in Svet pripravi redno letno poročilo o izvajanju te direktive.
g) A regular annual reporting of the Commission to the EP and the Council on the implementation of this directive is proposed.
To bo omogočilo večjo odgovornost pri postopku izvajanja (predlog spremembe k členu 40 a (novo)).
This will provide for a better accountability of the implementation process (Amendment on Article 40 a (new)).
Evropska komisija se je izognila vprašanju nadomestil s tem, da jih ni omenila.
The European Commission has avoided the issue of offsets by not mentioning them.
V delovnem dokumentu služb Komisije
A Commission staff working paper
Delovni dokument služb Komisije SEC (2007)1599 z dne 5.12.2007. , ki spremlja predlagano direktivo, je bilo sklenjeno, da je zaželeno, da se državam članicam prepusti vprašanje odločitev o ohranitvi morebitnih zahtevkov za nadomestila v skladu s pravom EU.
Commission staff working paper SEC (2007)1599 dated 5.12.2007. accompanying the proposed directive concluded that it was advisable to leave up to Member States the issue of keeping possible offset requirements compatible with EU law.
Trenutne politike pravičnega povračila (juste retour) in nadomestil v okviru javnih naročil na področju varnosti in obrambe lahko vodijo k nižji kakovosti opreme, kar bi povečalo tveganje za varnost oseb, ki sodelujejo v misijah v okviru evropske varnostne in obrambne politike.
Current policies of juste retour and off-setting in the field of security and defence procurement may lead to a lower quality of the equipment thus increasing the security risks of persons deployed on ESDP missions.
Te prakse lahko upočasnijo postopke javnih naročil in vodjo k višjim stroškom za opremo.
These practices can also delay the procurement procedures and lead to higher cost of the equipment.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije v okviru EVOP (PE 372.113v03-00, A6-0366/2006 ). vztraja, da se praksa nadomestil in pravičnega povračila (juste retour) odpravi.
European Parliament resolution on the implementation of the ESS in the context of ESDP (PE 372.113v03-00, A6-0366/2006 ). insists that the practice of offsets and juste retour has to be abolished.
Poročevalec sprejema razmišljanje Evropske komisije, da se na tej stopnji v predlagani direktivi ne preuči vprašanja nadomestil, vendar pa meni, da je treba v prihodnje to vprašanje zastaviti na evropski ravni, da se ta praksa odpravi.
Your draftsman accepts the reasoning of the European Commission to not examine at this stage the issue of offsets in the proposed directive, nevertheless he holds the view that in future this issue should be raised at European level in view of abolishing this practice.
(37) Preverjanje sposobnosti ponudnikov in njihova izbira se morata opraviti na pregleden način.
(37) Verification of the suitability and the selection of candidates should be carried out in transparent conditions.
Zato je treba navesti nediskriminacijske pogoje, ki jih lahko naročniki uporabijo pri izbiri tekmecev, in sredstva, ki jih gospodarski subjekti lahko uporabijo kot dokaz, da izpolnjujejo te pogoje.
For this purpose, non-discriminatory criteria should be indicated which the contracting authorities may use when selecting competitors and the means which economic operators may use to prove they have satisfied those criteria.
V tem smislu preglednosti je treba takoj po razpisu naročila od naročnika zahtevati, da navede merila za izbor, ki jih bo uporabil, ter raven posebne usposobljenosti, ki jo lahko zahteva ali ne zahteva od gospodarskih subjektov za sodelovanje v postopku za oddajo naročila.
In the same spirit of transparency, the contracting authority should be required, as soon as a contract is put out to competition, to indicate the selection criteria it will use and the level of specific competence it may or may not demand of the economic operators before admitting them to the procurement procedure.
Pri izbiri ponudnikov morajo naročniki upoštevati potrebe po avtonomiji in operacijski suverenosti z evropskega vidika, potrebo po ohranitvi evropske industrijske in tehnološke premoči, kjer ima to gospodarsko korist, ter potrebo po recipročnosti trga do tretjih držav.
In the selection of candidates, contracting authorities should take into account the need for autonomy and operational sovereignty from a European perspective, the need to sustain European industrial and technological pre-eminence where this is economically valuable and the need for reciprocity of market access vis-à-vis third states .
Člen 1 – točka a
Article 1 – point a
a) dobava orožja, streliva in/ali vojaških sredstev iz Sklepa Sveta z dne 15. aprila 1958 in po potrebi javna naročila gradenj in storitev, ki so strogo povezane s temi dobavami;
a) the supply of arms, munitions and/or war material, referred to in the Council Decision of 15 April 1958 and, where necessary, public works and services contracts strictly related to these supplies;
a) dobava vseh izdelkov, ki so posebno namenjeni vojaški uporabi in navedeni v skupnem seznamu vojaške opreme, ki ga zajema kodeks ravnanja Evropske unije glede izvoza orožja, in po potrebi javna naročila gradenj in storitev, ki so strogo povezane s temi dobavami;
a) the supply of any product specifically designed for military use and referred to in the Common List of military equipment covered by the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports and, where necessary, public works and services contracts strictly related to these supplies;
Sklep Sveta z dne 15. aprila 1958 ni javni dokument EU in tako s pravnega vidika ni na razpolago.
The Council Decision of 15 April 1958 is not an EU officially public document and hence unavailable as a matter of law.
Poleg tega pa seznam vse od sprejetja pred petdesetimi leti nikoli ni bil posodobljen.
Furthermore, the list has never been updated since its adoption 50 years ago.
Boljša alternativa bi lahko bila uporaba skupnega seznama vojaške opreme, ki ga zajema kodeks ravnanja Evropske unije glede izvoza orožja, ki ga je Svet sprejel 7. julija 2000 in ga le-ta tudi redno posodablja; seznam je tudi podlaga za področje uporabe predlagane direktive o poenostavitvi pogojev za prenose obrambnih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti.
A better alternative would be to use the Common Military List covered by the EU Code on Arms Exports adopted by the Council on 7 July 2000 and regularly updated by the Council, which is as well the basis for scope of the proposed directive on simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community.
Naročniki morajo obravnavati gospodarske subjekte enakopravno in nediskriminacijsko ter delovati transparentno.
Contracting authorities shall treat economic operators equally and non-discriminatorily and shall act in a transparent way.
Pri obravnavi gospodarskih subjektov naročniki upoštevajo potrebo po ohranitvi evropske industrijske in tehnološke premoči, kjer ima to gospodarsko korist, strateški pomen ter potrebo po recipročnosti trga do tretjih držav.
W hen dealing with economic operators, contracting authorities shall take into account the need to sustain European industrial and technological pre-eminence where this is economically valuable and strategically important and the need for reciprocity of market access vis-à-vis third states.
V primeru javnih naročil, ki vključujejo, imajo za posledico in/ali vsebujejo občutljive informacije, naročnik v razpisni dokumentaciji natančno navede vse ukrepe in zahteve, potrebne za zagotavljanje varovanja teh informacij na zahtevani ravni.
When the public contracts involve, entail and/or contain sensitive information, the contracting authority shall specify in the contract documents all measures and requirements needed to ensure the security of such information at the requisite level.
V ta namen lahko naročnik od ponudnika zahteva, da njegova ponudba vsebuje zlasti naslednje elemente:
To this end, the contracting authority may require of the tenderer that the tender submitted contain the following particulars:
a) dokazilo, da imajo že določeni podizvajalci zahtevane zmogljivosti za varovanje zaupnosti občutljivih informacij, do katerih imajo dostop ali ki jih morajo predložiti pri izvajanju svojih podizvajalskih dejavnosti;
a) proof that the subcontractors already identified possess the capabilities required to protect the confidentiality of the sensitive information to which they have access or which they are required to produce when carrying out their subcontracting activities,
b) zavezo, da bo ista dokazila predložil za nove podizvajalce, predvidene med izvajanjem naročila;
b) a commitment to provide the same proof for any new subcontractors that may be involved during performance of the contract,
c) zavezo, da bo zaupnost vseh občutljivih informacij ohranil ves čas izvajanja naročila in po odpovedi pogodbe ali njenem poteku.
c) a commitment to keep all sensitive information confidential for the entire duration of the contract and after termination or conclusion of the contract.