natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta EU za gozdove 2006–2011 ( KOM(2006)0302 ) in vmesne ocene njegovega izvajanja
- having regard to the EU Forest Action Plan 2006-2011 (FAP) ( COM(2006)0302 ) and the mid-term external evaluation of its implementation
Pogodba o izvajanju storitve št. 30-CE-0227729/00-59. ,
Service Contract No. 30-CE-0227729/00-59. ,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/147/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. novembra 2009 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic
- having regard to Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0325 . ter z dne 3. februarja 2009 o divjini v Evropi
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0325 . and of 3 February 2009 on wilderness in Europe
– ob upoštevanju sklepov desete konference pogodbenic konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti iz Nagoje oktobra 2010 in ciljev biotske raznovrstnosti iz Aičija, zlasti zaveze o zaščiti 17 % kopenskih in celinskih vodnih območij z učinkovitimi ohranitvenimi ukrepi, vključenimi v širšo krajino,
- having regard to the conclusions of the UNEP COP10 Conference on Biological Diversity in Nagoya in October 2010 and the Aichi biodiversity targets, particularly the commitment to protect 17% of terrestrial and inland water areas through effective conservation measures, integrated into the wider landscapes,
– ob upoštevanju študije „Shaping forest communication in the European Union: public perceptions of forests and forestry (Oblikovanje komunikacije o gozdovih v Evropski uniji: odnos javnosti do gozdov in gozdarstva)
- having regard to the study entitled ‘Shaping forest communication in the European Union: public perceptions of forests and forestry’
Javni razpis AGRI-2008-EVAL-10 // okvirna pogodba št. 30-CE-0101908/00-50. ,
Tender No AGRI-2008-EVAL-10 // Framework Contract No. 30-CE-0101908/00-50. ,
– ob upoštevanju okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja (UNFCCC), kjotskega protokola ter poročila Medvladnega foruma o podnebnih spremembah (IPCC) o dobrih praksah rabe zemljišč, spremembe namembnosti zemljišč in gozdarstva (LULUCF),
- having regard to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report on ‘Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF)’,
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta EU za biomaso (KOM (2005)0628),
- having regard to the EU biomass action plan (COM (2005)0628),
- ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/28/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, spremembi in poznejši razveljavitvi direktiv 2001/77/ES in 2003/30/ES (direktiva o obnovljivih virih energije)
- having regard to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (Renewable Energy Directive)
UL L 140, 5.6.2009, str.
OJ L 140 5.6.2009, p.
16. , Direktive 2009/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o spremembi Direktive 2003/87/ES z namenom izboljšanja in razširitve sistema Skupnosti za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov (direktiva ETS)
16. , Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community (the ETS Directive)
UL L 140, 5.6.2009, str.
OJ L 140, 5.
– ob upoštevanju Evropskega programa za podnebne spremembe in dela, ki ga je opravila strokovna skupina za podnebno politiko za dobre prakse rabe zemljišč, spremembe namembnosti zemljišč in gozdarstva
- having regard to the European Climate Change Programme and the work carried out by the expert group on climate policy for LULUCF
– ob upoštevanju evropske konvencije o krajini iz leta 2000 (konvencija iz Firenc),
- having regard to the European Landscape Convention of 2000 (the Florence Convention),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 1999/105/ES o trženju gozdnega reprodukcijskega materiala
- having regard to Council Directive 1999/105/EC on the marketing of forest reproductive material
– ob upoštevanju zbirnega poročila pobude TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity – Ekonomika ekosistemov in biotske raznovrstnosti) o uvajanju ekonomike narave in njenega posodobljenega pregleda podnebnih vprašanj,
- having regard to the synthesis report by TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) on ‘Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature’ and the TEEB Climate Issues Update,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 26. aprila 2010 o preprečevanju gozdnih požarov v Evropski uniji,
- having regard to the Council conclusions of 26 April 2010 on prevention of forest fires within the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 8. in 9. novembra o inovativnih rešitvah za financiranje preprečevanja nesreč,
- having regard to the Council conclusions of 8 and 9 November 2010 on innovative solutions for financing disaster prevention,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2008/99/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja
- having regard to Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the protection of the environment through criminal law
UL L 328, 6.12.2008, str.
OJ L 328, 6.12.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila o končnem izvajanju sistema Forest Focus ( KOM(2010)0430 ),
- having regard to the report on the final implementation of the Forest Focus Regulation ( COM(2010)0430 ),
– ob upoštevanju tehničnega poročila Evropske agencije za okolje (EEA) št. 9/2006 „European forest types Categories and types for sustainable forest management reporting and policy“ (Evropski tipi gozdov: kategorije in tipi za poročanje in politiko trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov),
- having regard to the European Environment Agency (EEA) Technical Report No 9/2006, ‘European forest types: Categories and types for sustainable forest management reporting and policy’,
– ob upoštevanju poročila generalnemu direktoratu Evropske komisije za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja „Impacts of Climate Change on European Forests and Options for Adaptation“ (Učinki podnebnih sprememb za evropske gozdove in možnosti prilagajanja)
- having regard to the report to the Commission DG for Agriculture and Rural Development entitled ‘Impacts of Climate Change on European Forests and Options for Adaptation’
– ob upoštevanju poročila generalnemu direktoratu Komisije za okolje „EU policy options for the protection of European forests against harmful impacts“ (Možnosti politike EU za zaščito evropskih gozdov pred škodljivimi vplivi)
- having regard to the 2009 report to the Commission DG for Environment entitled ‘EU policy options for the protection of European forests against harmful impacts’
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 9/2004 o gozdarskih ukrepih v okviru politike razvoja podeželja (skupaj z odgovori Komisije),
- having regard to the European Court of Auditors Special Report No 9/2004 on ‘Forestry Measures within Rural Development Policy’ (together with the Commission’s replies),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 995/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o določitvi obveznosti gospodarskih subjektov, ki dajejo na trg les in lesne proizvode
- having regard to Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market
UL L 295, 12.11.2010, str.
OJ L 295, 12.11.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju priporočil mreže strokovnjakov Organizacije za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO)/Gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo (UNECE)/Mednarodne organizacije dela (ILO) za izvajanje trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov,
- having regard to the recommendations of the FAO/UNECE/ILO Experts Network on implementing sustainable forest management,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije H1 Ministrske konference za varovanje gozdov v Evropi (MCPFE) v Helsinkih, ki trajnostno upravljanje gozdov opredeljuje kot „gospodarjenje z gozdovi in gozdnimi območji ter njihovo rabo na način in v obsegu, ki ohranjata njihovo biološko raznovrstnost, produktivnost, sposobnost obnavljanja, vitalnost in sposobnost zdaj in v prihodnje izpolnjevati ustrezne ekološke, gospodarske in socialne funkcije na lokalni, nacionalni in svetovni ravni, brez povzročanja škode na drugih ekosistemih“,
- having regard to MCPFE Helsinki Resolution H1 defining SFM as ‘the stewardship and use of forests and forest lands in a way, and at a rate, that maintains their biodiversity, productivity, regeneration capacity, vitality and their potential to fulfil, now and in the future, relevant ecological, economic and social functions, at local, national, and global levels, and that does not cause damage to other ecosystems’,
– ob upoštevanju člena 48 svojega poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 48 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0113/2011 ),
- having regard to the report by its Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0113/2011 ),
A. ker gozdovi in gozdnata zemljišča pokrivajo 42 % površine EU, ker na gozdarstvu temelječe gospodarske dejavnosti zagotavljajo več kot 300 milijard prometa in več kot 2 milijona delovnih mest, predvsem na podeželju, z lesom in turističnimi možnostmi pa prispevajo h gospodarski rasti, delovnim mestom in blaginji,
A. whereas forests and wooded land cover more than 42% of the EU’s surface, and forest-based industries, with a turnover of more than EUR 300 billion, provide more than 2 million, mostly rural, jobs, contributing to economic growth, jobs and prosperity through the provision of timber and opportunities for tourism,
B. ker gozdovi EU predstavljajo celoto biosfer, ki presega zgolj drevesa, zagotavljajo neprecenljive ekosistemske storitve, na primer skladiščenje ogljika, uravnavanje vodotokov, ohranjanje krajine in rodovitnosti tal, varovanje tal pred erozijo in dezertifikacijo ter varstvo pred naravnimi nesrečami, kar je izredno velikega pomena za kmetijstvo, razvoj podeželja in kakovost življenja evropskih državljanov,
B. whereas EU forests make up totalities of biospheres comprising not merely trees, providing invaluable ecosystem services including carbon storage, watercourse regulation, landscape preservation, maintenance of soil fertility, protection of soil from erosion and desertification, and protection from natural disasters, all of which are of great significance to agriculture, rural development and the quality of life of European citizens ,
C. ker je okoli 40 % gozdov EU v javni lasti, okoli 60 % pa v lasti več kot deset milijonov zasebnih lastnikov, tako da so za varstvo gozdov in njihovo trajnostno rabo z trajnostnim upravljanjem na terenu odgovorni javni organi in zasebniki,
C. whereas around 40% of the EU’s forests are under public ownership and around 60% of the EU’s forests are owned by more than 10 million private forest owners, so that both private and public stakeholders have a responsibility for forest protection and the sustainable use of forests through the implementation of SFM on the ground,
D. ker je kljub alarmantni stopnji krčenja gozdov v različnih delih sveta stopnja gozdnatosti v EU stabilna, ocenjuje pa se tudi, da se povečuje ogljik v lesni biomasi; ker skladiščenje ogljika v gozdovih po Evropi kljub na splošno pozitivnim težnjam ostaja veliko pod naravno zmogljivostjo in bi se lahko preobrnila v vir ogljika, saj je vse več pritiska za izkoriščanje, tako da v EU zaradi gozdnih požarov in nezakonite sečnje vsako leto izgubimo približno 500.000 hektarjev gozda,
D. whereas, despite alarming deforestation rates in various parts of the world, the long-term trend of increasing forest coverage in the EU is stable, and carbon in woody biomass is estimated to be expanding; whereas, despite the generally positive trend, carbon storage in forests across Europe remains far below natural capacity and could reverse to a source, as pressure to increase harvesting levels is increasing and approximately 500 000 hectares of EU forest are lost every year as a result of forest fires and illegal logging,
E. ker je 30 % območij NATURA 2000 gozdni in gozdnatih habitatov, ki imajo v mreži biotopov pomembno vezno vlogo, ker je 66 % gozdnih habitatnih tipov v interesu Skupnosti v slabo ohranjenih,
E. whereas 30% of NATURA 2000 sites are forest and other wooded-land habitats, playing an important role as links in the network of biotopes; and whereas 66% of forest ‘habitat types of Community interest’ have unfavourable conservation status,
F. ker gorski gozdovi tvorijo tretjino vseh gozdnih površin v EU in so bistvenega pomena za naravno krajino, saj pomagajo varovati tla in regulirati oskrbo z vodo; ker imajo ti gozdovi ključno vlogo pri lokalnih gospodarskih dejavnostih,
F. whereas mountain forests account for one third of the total forest area in the EU and are essential to the natural landscape as they help in soil protection and regulating water supply; whereas these forests play a fundamental role in local economic activity,
G. ker lahko zaščita zadnjih preostalih območij divjine prispeva k zaustavitvi izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti in slabšanja ekosistemskih storitev v EU do leta 2020,
G. whereas protection of the last remaining wilderness areas can contribute to the halting of biodiversity loss and of the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020,
H. ker naj bi proizvodnja energije iz trdne biomase in bioloških odpadkov po napovedih do leta 2020 predstavljala 58 % obnovljivih virov energije EU, delež biomase gozdnega izvora pa naj bi relativno gledano upadel, vendar je vse več povpraševanja po lesu kot viru energije; ker je torej potrebna previdnost, da se prepreči nezakonita sečnja in intenziviranje gozdarskih praks, ki bi utegnile v nekaterih državah članicah povečati razmerje med sečnjo in prirastom za več kot 100 %, kar bi imelo nasprotni učinek za cilje glede podnebnih sprememb in biotske raznovrstnosti; ker bi energija iz biomase morala biti manj odvisna od gozdne biomase,
H. whereas energy generation from solid biomass and biowaste is projected to be 58% of EU renewables by 2020 and, while forestry biomass share is expected to decrease in relative terms, there is a steadily increasing demand for timber as a source of energy; whereas vigilance is therefore necessary to prevent illegal logging and the intensification of forestry practices that could increase the ratio of felling to increment to over 100% in some Member States, counteracting climate-change and biodiversity objectives; whereas energy from biomass should be less dependent on forest biomass,
I. ker je treba varstvo gozdov in njihovih funkcij vključiti v vse politike EU, ki zadevajo gozdove,
I. whereas forest protection and protection of forests’ functions should be mainstreamed in all EU policies affecting forests,
J. ker so gozdovi živi in razvijajoči se ekosistemi, ki pogosto segajo prek državnih meja in jih lahko različno razvrstimo, na primer glede na bioklimatsko območje ali tip gozda, in ker je Evropska agencija za okolje (EEA) za usmerjanje odločanja v politikah EU razvila posebno nomenklaturo gozdov; ker bi bilo treba v politikah EU, ki zadevajo gozdove, upoštevati najnovejša znanstvena dognanja z vseh področij, na primer o celinskem razvodju, in pri teh politikah bi bilo treba preprečiti, da bi postale preširoke in premalo uporabne,
J. whereas forests constitute live and evolutionary ecosystems, often cutting across state borders, which may be classified in different ways such as by bioclimatic zones or forest types, and whereas, in order to guide EU policy decisions, the EEA has developed a specific forest nomenclature; whereas the latest scientific achievements from all fields, such as the ‘continental divide’, should be taken into account in EU policies affecting forests, and those policies should avoid the risk of being too broad to be useful,
K. ker se različni tipi gozdov in gozdarski sektor zaradi podnebnih sprememb lahko soočijo z različnimi nepredvidljivimi biotskimi in abiotskimi nevarnostmi, na primer škodljivci, nevihtami, sušo in požari, zaradi česar je osnova prizadevanj za njihovo zaščito njihova odpornost,
K. whereas different forest types and the forestry sector face different and unpredictable biotic and abiotic threats from climate change, such as pests, storms, drought and fire, rendering forest resilience the cornerstone of protection efforts,
L. ker so zanesljive in primerljive informacije o stanju gozdov EU ter posledicah podnebnih sprememb in proizvodnih vzorcev v gozdovih pomemben predpogoj za politiko in načrtovanje, tudi v zvezi s prispevkom gozdov k blažitvi podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanju nanje,
L. whereas solid and comparable information on the state of EU forests and the consequences of climate change and production patterns in forests is an important precondition for policy and planning, including on forests’ contribution to climate-change mitigation and adaptation,
M. ker naravni in podtaknjeni gozdni požari, slednji pogosto iz prikritih vzgibov, vsako leto uničijo več kot 400.000 hektarov gozdov, ne samo v Sredozemlju, pri čemer nastane velika škoda pri človeških življenjih, nepremičninah, zaposlovanju, biotski raznovrstnosti in varovalni funkciji gozdov; ker je regeneracija po požaru v vseh gozdovih še posebej težavna, pri omrežju Natura 2000 pa onemogoči uresničevanje njegovih ciljev,
M. whereas wildfires and arson, often carried out for ulterior motives, destroy more than 400 000 hectares of forest per year, especially but not exclusively in the Mediterranean region, at great cost to human life, property, employment, biodiversity and the protective functions of forests; whereas regeneration after fire is especially difficult for all forests, and in the case of the NATURA 2000 network, hinders attainment of the network’s objectives,
N. ker omenjena bela knjiga o prilagajanju na podnebne spremembe zajema gozdove kot eno od ključnih področij ukrepanja, pri čemer je poudarjeno, da bi bilo treba gozdarsko strategijo EU posodobiti, da bi zajela tudi vidike, povezane s spreminjanjem podnebja,
N. whereas the above-mentioned White Paper on adapting to climate change includes forests as one of the key areas of action, stressing that the EU forestry strategy should be updated to include aspects linked to climate change,
O. ker je samo 5 %, evropskih gozdov prvinskega pragozda, v katerega človek še ni posegal; ker majhen delež tovrstnih gozdov skupaj z vse večjo razdrobljenostjo preostalih vrst gozdov povečuje dovzetnost gozdov za podnebne nevarnosti, to pa delno pojasnjuje nepretrgano slabo stanje ohranjenosti številnih ogroženih evropskih gozdnih vrst,
O. whereas only 5% of the European forest area is old-growth, primary and undisturbed by human activity; whereas the small share of this type of forest, in combination with increased fragmentation of the remaining stands of all forest types, increases the susceptibility of forests to climate threats, and partially explains the continuing poor conservation status of many forest species of European concern,
P. ker bi krepitev varovalnih funkcij gozdov morala biti del strategij EU in držav članic za civilno zaščito, še zlasti ob spoprijemanju z ekstremnimi pojavi, povezanimi s podnebjem, kot so požari in poplave,
P. whereas enhancement of forests’ protective functions should form part of the EU and Member States’ strategies for civil protection, especially in the face of climate-related extreme phenomena such as fires and floods,
Q. ker je poročilo pobude TEEB predstavilo prepričljive argumente glede stroškov in koristi javnih naložb v ekosistemsko naravnane pristope za prilagajanje na podnebne spremembe in njihovo blažitev, predvsem v zvezi z zeleno infrastrukturo, na primer obnavljanjem in ohranjanjem gozdov,
Q. whereas the TEEB report has presented a compelling cost-benefit case for public investment in ecosystem-based approaches to climate-change adaptation and mitigation, particularly with regard to green infrastructure, such as restoring and conserving forests,
R. ker je treba upoštevati in podpirati različne nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne sisteme upravljanja gozdov, da se izboljša njihova zmožnost prilagajanja,
R. whereas diverse national, regional and local forest management systems must be respected as well as assisted, in order to enhance their adaptive capacity,
S. ker zmogljivost evropskih gozdov, da so učinkoviti ponori ogljikovega dioksida, amoniaka in dušikovih oksidov, še vedno ni dovolj raziskana, les iz trajnostno upravljanih gozdov pa bi utegnil imeti dodatne trajnostne koristi, saj se ga da reciklirati in je z ogljikom bogat nadomestek za energetsko intenzivne materiale – kovinske zlitine, plastiko in beton, ki se jih veliko uporablja v gradbeništvu in drugih panogah,
S. whereas the capacity of European forests to act as effective sinks for CO2, NH3 and NOX is still underexploited, and wood originating from sustainably managed forests may have sustained mitigation benefits, serving as a recyclable, carbon-rich substitute for energy intensive materials such as metal alloys, plastics and concrete that are widely used in construction and other industries,
T. ker se bo po podatkih, ki jih je zbrala Komisija, južna Evropa v poletnih mesecih segrevala dvakrat hitreje kot ostala Evropa, poletne padavine na jugu pa se bodo vsako desetletje zmanjšale za 5 %,
T. whereas, according to data gathered by the Commission, summer warm-up in Southern Europe will be twice as fast as in the rest of Europe and summer precipitation in the South will decrease by 5% per decade,
U. ker ima akcijski načrt EU za gozdove štiri cilje: izboljšanje dolgoročne konkurenčnosti, varstvo okolja, prispevek h kakovosti življenja in spodbujanje usklajevanja, in ker je bil predvsem pri izpolnjevanju prvega cilja dosežen precejšen napredek,
U. whereas the EU FAP has four goals: improving long-term competitiveness, protecting the environment, contributing to quality of life and fostering coordination, and whereas significant progress has been made mainly in achieving the first goal,
V. ker je bilo v procesu Forest Europe že doseženo prostovoljno evropsko soglasje o trajnostnem upravljanju gozdov; ker obstoječi okvir trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov ni splošno priznan in se ne izvaja dosledno,
V. whereas the Forest Europe process has achieved a voluntary European consensus on Sustainable Forest Management; whereas the existing context for SFM lacks full recognition and consistent implementation;
W. ker so bile kot del procesa Forest Europe opravljene obsežne priprave na pogajanja o pravno zavezujočem instrumentu in ker je na prihodnji konferenci v Oslu junija 2011 moč pričakovati odločitve glede tega instrumenta,
W. whereas, as part of the Forest Europe process, comprehensive preparations have been made for negotiations on a legally binding instrument, and whereas decisions on such an instrument can be expected at the next conference in Oslo in June 2011,
X. ker sta uredbi o preprečevanju gozdnih požarov
X. whereas the Forest Fire Prevention
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2158/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o varstvu gozdov Skupnosti pred požari (UL L 217, 31.7.1991, str.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2158/92 of 23 July 1992 on protection of the Community's forests against fire; OJ L 217, 31.7.1992, p.
3). in o sistemu Forest Focus
3. and Forest Focus Regulations
Uredba (ES) št. 2152/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2003 o spremljanju gozdov in medsebojnih okoljskih vplivih v Skupnosti (Forest Focus), UL L 324, 11.12.2003, str.
Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community (Forest Focus) OJ L 324, 11.12.2003, p.