natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vprašanje, ki se porodi je, kako najbolje razdeliti politične pristojnosti in sredstva na različne organizacijske ravni javnih oblasti, lokalne/regionalne, nacionalne in na ravni EU
In particular, the question arises of how best to allocate policy competences and resources across the different organizational levels of public authority - local/regional, national and EU."
Prispevek Evropskega raziskovalnega prostora
ERA Contribution
V EU narašča zavedanje, da je potrebno bolje organizirati večplastni sistem upravljanja raziskav, da bi se zagotovila večja skladnost med politikami, zmanjšala razdrobljenost financiranja in podvajanje dela.
In the EU there has been an increasing awareness of the need to better organize the multi-level governance systems for research in order to ensure greater complementarities of policies, to reduce fragmentation of funding and to avoid duplication of efforts.
Tudi regionalizacija se dokazano krepi.
There is also evidence of the increasing regionalization.
Uspešnost področij, kot sta Silikonska dolina in Cambridge, je prepričala vlade, da je potrebno ustvariti več tovrstnih inovativnih zbirnih točk znanja.
The success of areas like Silicon Valley and Cambridge has convinced governments of the need to create more of these innovative knowledge clusters.
Po drugi strani sta se doseg in obseg prispevka EU občutno povečala.
"On the other hand .... there has been a significant growth in the scale and scope of the EU level of intervention.
Od prvega okvirnega programa iz leta 1984 se je evropska raziskovalna politika razširila tako na področju ciljev, kot tudi finančno.
Since the 1st Framework Programme in 1984, European research policy has expanded in terms of its ambition and its budget. ...
Toda politike raziskav in inovacij so še naprej vzporedno vodene (na nacionalni, EU in regionalni ravni), kar ima za posledico slabo integracijo in usklajevanje med temi ravnmi
However,.... research and innovation policies continue to be pursued largely in parallel -at national, EU and regional levels- leading to what some have called a "governance gap" of poor integration and coordination between these different levels"
Za razliko od Združenih držav Amerike in Japonske evropska raziskovalna dejavnost še vedno predstavlja sestavljenko nacionalnih javnih sistemov.
Unlike the United States or Japan, European research still represents a “puzzle” of national public systems.
Nacionalne dejavnosti, ki so pod 27 različnimi zakonodajnimi, uredbenimi in finančnimi ustroji, so še vedno zelo neodvisne druga od druge
National activities, governed by 27 varying legislative, regulatory and financial structures, are still largely undertaken independently of one another
Primer temeljnih raziskav prikazuje te težave.
The example of basic research illustrates these issues.
Financiranje je razpršeno po vsej Skupnosti in posledično veliko projektov ne doseže kritične mase.
Its funding is dispersed across the Union, and consequently, many projects lack the necessary critical mass.
Vsota, ki jo porabi Univerza John Hopkins za temeljne raziskave presega posamezna prizadevanja 18 držav članic EU in je višja od skupne vsote 10 v novih državah članicah. .
The amount spent by Johns Hopkins University on basic research exceeds the individual efforts of 18 EU MS’s, and is greater than the combined efforts of the 10 new MS’s.
EU pomaga pri izravnavi s tem, da financira nadnacionalne skupne raziskave znotraj okvirnih programov.
The EU already helps to compensate funding trans-national collaborative research under the FP’s.
Vendar je finančna podpora, ki jo danes lahko nudi EU, omejena.
However, the financial support the EU can offer today is limited.
Prizadevanja Skupnosti na področju raziskav so razvidna iz 28. raziskovalne politike, katere proračun znaša zgolj 6 % javnih sredstev, kar ne more imeti zadostnega dinamičnega učinka na integracijo nacionalnih politik.
Community efforts represent a 28th research policy , with a budget of only around 6% of public funding, it cannot be sufficiently dynamic to have a truly integrating effect on national policies.
Evropski raziskovalni prostor je pobuda, ki je bila sprejeta marca 2000, da bi se te težave rešile; a kljub doseženemu napredku v teh letih, bi bilo treba doseči višjo raven usklajenosti in sodelovanje po vsej Evropi.
The European Research Area (ERA) initiative was launched in March 2000 to tackle these issues, but despite the progress achieved in these years, greater coordination and cooperation had to be achieved throughout Europe.
V evropskem raziskovalnem sistemu bi moralo biti več povezav med različnimi subjekti (javne oblasti, podjetja, univerze, raziskovalni inštituti) na vseh političnih ravneh (regionalni, nacionalni, medvladni in na ravni Skupnosti).
"More links had to be established between the different players (public authorities, firms, universities, research institutes) at all policy levels (regional, national, Community, inter-governmental) in the European research system."
Po drugi strani so se razmere od leta 2000 opazno razvile:
On the other hand, the context has evolved considerably since 2000:
- globalizacija se je pospešila in znanje je ključni del njene dinamike.
- Globalization has accelerated and knowledge is a key component of this new global dynamic.
Vedno večji delež celotne dejavnosti na področju raziskav in razvoja se bo nahajal izven Evrope
An increasing share of global R&D will be located outside Europe
Kitajska in Indija se vzpenjata kot globalna subjekta na področju znanosti in tehnologije.
China and India have emerged as global S&T actors.
Indija je v zadnjem desetletju povečala vlaganja v dejavnosti na področju raziskav in razvoja s povprečno rastjo 8 % od leta 2003.
India increased its R&D spending threefold over the last decade, building on average economic growth of 8% since 2003.
Pričakuje se, da bo pri intenzivnosti vlaganj v raziskave in razvoj dosegla EU do leta 2009 (od leta 2004 je pridobila trikrat več inženirjev kot ZDA in isto število profesionalnih raziskovalcev, kot vse države članice EU skupaj). , in glede na trenutne trende, bo evropski delež pri raziskavah nekoč predstavljal manj kot 10 % globalnega pridobivanja znanja.
China is one of the world's largest spenders and it is expected to catch up with the EU by 2009 in terms of R&D intensity (since 2004, is producing 3 times more engineers than the US and has the same number of full time researchers as all EU MS’s together) . and, given the current trends, Europe's share of research will one day represent less than 10% of global knowledge production.
- pojavili so se številni družbeno-gospodarski izzivi – povečane razlike na družbeno-gospodarskem področju, podnebne spremembe, staranje ter nevarnost nalezljivih bolezni in vsi se strinjajo, da so potrebni močnejši in bolj osredotočeni ukrepi na ravni EU in na globalni ravni, zlasti na področju znanosti in tehnologije.
- Various socio-economic challenges are grown – increased socio-economic disparities, climate change, ageing, and risks of infectious diseases – and there is a consensus that stronger concerted actions are needed at EU and global level, notably in science and technology.
- evropski raziskovalni prostor se je razvil s sedmim okvirnim programom, v katerega so bili vključene točke, kot je Evropski raziskovalni svet, pa tudi s posebnimi ukrepi evropskega raziskovalnega prostora in z večjo raznolikostjo znanstvenih kultur, ki so prišle v EU s širitvijo
- The European research landscape has evolved with the launching of the 7 th FP, containing new measures such as the European Research Council (ERC), but also through various ERA specific measures, as well as the wider diversity of scientific cultures that have come with the expanded EU
S pristopom Romunije in Bolgarije se je populacija EU povečala na 490 milijonov ljudi, kar je tretje največje področje na svetu, po Kitajski in Indiji.
With the accession of Romania and Bulgaria, the EU population has risen to around 490 million people, the world's third largest population area after China and India.
EU je vodilni trg na svetu v smislu povpraševanja po znanju.
The EU is the world's leading market in terms of demand for knowledge-intensive products.
Študije so pokazale, da je povpraševanje po znanju glavna vzpodbuda za raziskave in razvoj ter za naložbene odločitve.
Studies have shown that demand for such products is a major driver of R&D location and investment decisions.
Težava pa je v tem, da skupni trg EU za dosežke znanosti in tehnologije še ne obstaja.
The problem is, however, that a single EU market for S&T intensive products does not exist yet.
Ostajajo številne ovire: razlike v nacionalnih zakonodajah, različni tehnični standardi, posebnosti lokalnih trgov itd. .
Several barriers persist: different national legislation, different technical standards, specificities in local markets, etc. .
EU ima dolgo tradicijo odličnosti pri dejavnostih na področju raziskav in razvoja, a te so običajno razpršene po Evropi, saj je 80 % javnih raziskav opravljenih na nacionalni ravni, večinoma znotraj nacionalnih ali regionalnih programov.
The EU has a long tradition of excellence in R&D, but this excellence is often scattered across Europe, with 80% of public research being conducted at national level, mainly under national or regional research programmes.
To še prepogosto pomeni, da raziskovalni potencial EU ni v popolnosti izkoriščen.
This all too often means that the potential of EU research is not fully exploited.
Zelena knjiga Komisije poudarja bistvena vprašanja evropskega raziskovalnega prostora:
The Commission Green Paper points out crucial issues cutting across all dimensions of the ERA:
- vzpostavitev notranjega trga za raziskave – prostora za prost pretok znanja, raziskovalcev in tehnologije – z namenom povečanja sodelovanja, spodbujanja inovacij in doseganja boljšega razporejanja virov;
- The creation of an 'internal market' for research - an area of free movement of knowledge, researchers and technology - with the aim of increasing cooperation, stimulating innovation and achieving a better allocation of resources;
– razvoj evropske raziskovalne politike je globoko zakoreninjen v evropski družbi.
The development of a European research policy deeply rooted in European society.
Podpirati bi morala napredek na področjih, ki so najpomembnejša za javnost, kot so zdravje, energija in podnebne spremembe;
It should support advancement in fields of a major public concern, such as health, energy and climate change.
- obnova raziskovalne strukture za dosego ravnovesja med konkurenčnostjo in sodelovanjem ter za dosego odličnosti na svetovni ravni;
- A restructuring of the research fabric in Europe is needed to achieve a balance between competition and cooperation and in order to develop world-class excellence.
- evropsko raziskovanje mora v polni meri izkoristiti raznolikost Evrope, ki se je še obogatila z nedavnima širitvama.
- European research must fully benefit from Europe's diversity, which has been enriched with the recent EU enlargements.
Ta vprašanja bi morala biti v središču institucionalne in javne razprave, ki pripravlja pobude za leto 2008, saj se približuje revizija prvega triletja obnovljene lizbonske strategije in s tem začetek drugega cikla.
These issues should be the core of an institutional and public debate aimed to prepare initiatives for 2008, as we approach the review of the first three-year cycle of the renewed Lisbon Strategy and the launch of the second cycle.
Osnovni cilji evropskega raziskovalnega prostora ostajajo isti, vendar je potreben bolj dinamičen pristop
While the original ERA objectives remain valid today, a more dynamic approach is needed.
Ne bodo zadostovale majhne izboljšave, temveč morata učinkovitost in vpliv postati prednostni nalogi...ukrepi so potrebni tam, kjer bodo najbolj učinkoviti.
This means a reallocation of responsibilities and assumes going beyond the existing structure of the European research system...."
Ta novi dogovor bo vključeval ambiciozen pristop k uresničevanju evropskega raziskovalnega prostora.
"This " New Deal " would involve a more ambitious approach towards the realisation of the European Research Area.....
Za razliko od prvotne pobude ta ne spodbuja zgolj vzpostavljanja vezi med obstoječimi evropskimi subjekti na področju znanosti in tehnologije, vsakega s svojo vlogo in pristojnostmi.
Unlike the original ERA initiative, it does not simply promote the establishment of links between existing European S&T players, each with their own existing roles and responsibilities.....
Gre predvsem za ohranjanje odprtosti za različne rešitve po izidih te razprave in raziskave.
It is, above all, important to keep an open mind about the outcome of this debate and inquiry.
To bi lahko vodilo k širitvi nacionalnih in regionalnih dejavnosti na nekaterih področjih ali pa k povečanju dejavnosti na ravni EU na drugih.
It could mean an expansion of national or regional activities in some areas.
Možno je tudi, da bo treba ustanoviti nove skupne evropske institucije za znanost in tehnologijo,
It could lead to an increase in EU-level actions in others.
266 zgledujoč se na uspešne primere, kot sta Evropska organizacija za jedrske raziskave in Evropska vesoljska agencija.
266. , looking at organizations like CERN and ESA, good examples of success stories.
Novi dogovor bi pomenil tudi, da bi te odločitve bile pripravljene na osnovi trdnih skupnih dokazov in da bi se pogumno soočili s spremembami.
"The New Deal would mean preparing these decisions together based on solid, shared evidence, and bravely facing"
o Evropskem raziskovalnem prostoru: nove perspektive
on The European Research Area: New Perspectives
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. poudarja, da je dobro delujoči notranji trg pomemben za uspešen razvoj evropskega raziskovalnega območja, kar zlasti velja za prosto kroženje raziskovalcev; obžaluje, da se raziskovalci še vedno soočajo z ovirami pri mobilnosti v EU; poziva k ukrepom za izboljšanje prostega pretoka raziskovalcev, še posebej z odpravo vseh preostalih prehodnih omejitev prostega gibanja delavcev, kot tudi za izboljšanje raziskovalne infrastrukture EU; podpira ustanovitev Evropskega tehnološkega inštituta;
Underlines that a well-functioning Internal Market is important for a successful development of the ERA and in particular that the free circulation of researchers is vital; regrets that researchers still have obstacles hampering their mobility within the EU; calls for measures to improve the free-flow of researchers, in particular by lifting all the remaining transitional restrictions on the free movement of workers as well as improving the EU's infrastructure of research; supports the creation of the European Institute of Technology .
4. poudarja, kako pomembno je, da se v EU privablja tudi raziskovalce iz tretjih držav, zlasti iz evropskih sosedskih držav, med drugim s hitrejšim prenosom direktive Sveta 2005/71/ES z dne 12. oktobra 2005 o posebnem postopku za dovolitev vstopa državljanom tretjih držav za namene znanstvenega raziskovanja
Underlines the importance of attracting researchers also from third countries to the EU, particularly from the European neighbourhood countries, inter alia by way of a more rapid transposition of the Council Directive 2005/71/EC of 12 October 2005 on a specific procedure for admitting third-country nationals for the purposes of scientific research
6. poudarja pomen pravnega okvira za intelektualno lastnino na področju znanstvenih publikacij, saj zagotavlja najboljši možni dostop do znanstvenih informacij in hkrati ohranja pomembno vlogo podjetij EU na tem področju;
Highlights the importance of a legal framework for intellectual property in scientific publications which guarantees the best possible access to scientific information while safeguarding the major role played by EU undertakings in scientific publishing;
10. ugotavlja, da ciljev lizbonske strategije ni mogoče doseči brez močno povečane vključenosti zasebnih podjetij v raziskovalne dejavnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme ukrepe za izboljšanje spodbud za zasebna podjetja, da bi ta vlagala v raziskave in pri njih sodelovala; se strinja s stališčem, da je potrebno razviti/povečati vodilno vlogo Evrope na tehnološko intenzivnih trgih ob podpori strogih standardov zaščite intelektualne lastnine; meni, da je zato potrebno znotraj tržišč, ki dobro funkcionirajo, razširiti javno-zasebno partnerstvo;
Notes that the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy cannot be achieved without a serious increase of the involvement of private business in research activities; calls on the Commission to take actions to enhance the incentives for private business to invest and participate in research; supports the view that is necessary to develop a European lead in technology-intensive markets supported by strong standards of intellectual property protection; holds the view that expanding Public Private Partnerships within well-functioning markets is important to this end.
Charlotte Cederschiöld, Corina Creţu, Mia De Vits, Janelly Fourtou, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Anna Hedh, Iliana Malinova Iotova, Pierre Jonckheer, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, , Catherine Neris, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Ple嗾insk・ Zuzana Roithov・ Leopold Jef Rutowicz, Heide R・le, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Alexander Stubb, Marianne Thyssen, Horia-Victor Toma, Jacques Toubon
Charlotte Cederschiöld, Corina Creţu, Mia De Vits, Janelly Fourtou, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Anna Hedh, Iliana Malinova Iotova, Pierre Jonckheer, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, , Catherine Neris, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Alexander Stubb, Marianne Thyssen, Horia-Victor Toma, Jacques Toubon
Emmanouil Angelakas, Andr・Brie, Wolfgang Bulfon, Ieke van den Burg, Colm Burke, Giovanna Corda, Andr疽 Gy・k, Filip Kaczmarek, Manuel Medina Ortega
Emmanouil Angelakas, André Brie, Wolfgang Bulfon, Ieke van den Burg, Colm Burke, Giovanna Corda, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Manuel Medina Ortega
Odbor za regionalni razvoj poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. ugotavlja, da so izobraževalne ustanove, zlasti univerze in visoke šole, zelo pomembne ter da imajo ključno vlogo pri spodbujanju raziskav, z njimi povezanih poklicev in inovacij ter pri prenosu tehnologij, zlasti na regionalni ravni; poudarja tudi, kako pomembne so območne skupnosti pri širjenju znanstvene kulture in spodbujanju dialoga med znanostjo in družbo; vztraja, da morajo pristojni javni organi vlagati v te sektorje, da bi se izboljšala raziskovalna orodja in infrastrukture;
Notes the importance of schools and in particular of universities and higher-education establishments and their fundamental role in promoting research and careers in research, innovation and technology transfer, particularly at regional level; underlines also the importance of local and regional authorities in spreading scientific culture and promoting dialogue between the scientific community and society; underlines, therefore, the need for the relevant public authorities to invest in these sectors in order to strengthen research tools and improve infrastructures;
6. priporoča, naj Evropski raziskovalni prostor pri svojem odpiranju v svet da prednost oddaljenim regijam in čezmorskim državam Evropske unije ter tako izkoristi prednosti in bogastva, ki jih nudi evropska regionalna različnost, ter naj te različnosti skladno vključi v dejavnosti na področju znanstvenega in tehnološkega sodelovanja v okviru "mreže odličnosti";
Hopes that the ERA, from the point of view of its openness to the world, will favour the outermost regions (ORs) and the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) in order to make the most of the advantages and riches offered by these European or partner regions, by incorporating them coherently into scientific and technological cooperation actions in the context of ‘networks of excellence’;
9. nadalje poudarja potrebo, da se, ob upoštevanju prednostnih nalog posameznih regionalnih omrežij, ki so jim ta sredstva namenjena, uskladi financiranje programov na nacionalni in regionalni ravni iz programov za raziskave in iz strukturnih skladov;
Stresses, furthermore, the need to coordinate at national and regional levels the funding provided under the Research Framework Programmes and from the Structural Funds, whilst bearing in mind the specific priorities of the regional networks within which those funds are deployed;
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Renato Brunetta, Jerzy Buzek, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Dragoş Florin David, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Gunnar Hmark, Mary Honeyball, J疣 Hudack, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Pia Elda Locatelli, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladim叝 Remek, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul R・ig, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Renato Brunetta, Jerzy Buzek, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Dragoş Florin David, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Gunnar Hökmark, Mary Honeyball, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Pia Elda Locatelli, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
o Svetovnem skladu za energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije
on the Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund
Anders Wijkman , Odbor za razvoj,
Anders Wijkman , Committee on Development,
Eija-Riitta Korhola , Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
Eija-Riitta Korhola , Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Postopek z združenimi odbori – člen 47 poslovnika
(*) Procedure with associated committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Development (*) .................................................11
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................14
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (*) 14
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................17
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................17
o Svetovnem skladu za energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije
on Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Aktiviranje javnega in zasebnega financiranja za svetovni dostop do podnebju prijaznih, dostopnih in varnih energetskih storitev: Svetovni sklad za energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije ( KOM(2006)0583 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled Mobilising public and private finance towards global access to climate-friendly, affordable and secure energy services: The Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund ( COM(2006)0583 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 8. in 9. marca 2007,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 8 and 9 March 2007,