natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– leta 1999 se je predsednik José Maria Gil-Robles odločil Sodišču predložiti ugotovitve, da bi zagovarjal legalnost direktive 98/43/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. julija 1998 o približevanju zakonov, podzakonskih in upravnih aktov držav članic glede oglaševanja in sponzoriranja tobačnih izdelkov;
Firstly: is it better to resolve the issue by interpretation and therefore simply confirm that the President of the Parliament is entitled, according to the existing practice, to take a decision contrary to the recommendation of the committee responsible?
Poročevalec ne more oceniti pravnega sklepanja, ki je bilo v podlagi odločitev pristojnega odbora, da svetuje predsedniku, naj v navedenih primerih ne predloži ugotovitev Sodišču.
It appears evident that Rule 121(3) in its present form applies only to 'actions' initiated by Parliament and does not cover 'observations' or 'interventions' in judicial procedures.
Meni, da bi Parlament načeloma moral zagovarjati veljavnost svojih aktov v zadevah, o katerih poteka postopek pred Sodiščem, v skladu z domnevo o zakonitosti in načelom lojalnega sodelovanja s sozakonodajalcem (Svetom).
Should the Rule remain in its current form, the Rapporteur would have to propose to the Committee the adoption of an explicit interpretation under which, for the submission of observations or interventions before the Court, the power to decide would always lie with the President of the Parliament.
Poročevalec vseeno meni, da utegne priti do izjemnih primerov, ko bi bilo mogoče dati Parlamentu možnost, da sprejme drugačno stališče od tistega, ki ga je sprejel v postopku soodločanja, pod pogojem, da so se pravne okoliščine pomembno spremenile (npr. reforma pogodb, začetek veljavnosti listine EU o temeljnih pravicah, sodna praksa), zaradi česar lahko določen akt postane neskladen s primarnim pravom Unije.
For reasons of completeness and legal certainty, the Rapporteur considers that a new paragraph should be added to Rule 121 in order to incorporate in the Rules of Procedure the established practice of the President to submit observations or intervene before the Court on behalf of Parliament upon a recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs.
Takšen akt bi ostal veljaven, kot je bil sprejet v skladu s prejšnjim pravnim okvirom, vendar ga Parlament brez pravice do pobude ne bi mogel spremeniti, da bi ga uskladil z novimi pravnimi okoliščinami.
The new paragraph shall also lay down the procedure to be followed when a divergence of views arises between the President and the committee responsible.
Zaradi narave te zadeve predlaga zamisel, da bi o tem najprej odločala konferenca predsednikov – organ, v katerem se odražajo razmerja moči v celotnem Parlamentu, ki pa obenem lahko presoja zadeve tudi na pravni ravni, po tem, ko se je seznanil z različnimi stališči in upošteval mnenje pravne službe Parlamenta.
Due to the nature of the matter, he puts forward the idea that the decision should be initially referred to the Conference of Presidents, a body which reflects the rapport de forces of the whole Parliament whilst also being in a position to consider the matter on its legal merits after having heard the different views and taken into consideration the opinion of Parliament's legal service.
Če konferenca predsednikov sklene, da Parlament ne bi smel predložiti ugotovitev v postopku pred Sodiščem oziroma se postopku pridružiti, da bi zagovarjal veljavnost pravnega akta, ki je bil sprejet s soodločanjem, se zadeva posreduje v odločanje plenarnemu zasedanju.
If the Conference of Presidents concludes that Parliament should not lodge observations or intervene before the Court in order to defend the validity of a legal act adopted by codecision, the matter would have to be referred to Plenary.
Poslanci bi morali imeti na voljo vso ustrezno dokumentacijo ali informacije, da bi lahko temeljito preučili zadevo in o njej odločali.
Members of Parliament should have at their disposal all relevant documents or information in order to be able to thoroughly examine the issue and take a decision.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bilo treba v postopkih, ko se Parlament izjemoma odloči, da ne bo zagovarjal veljavnosti zakonodajnega akta, ki sta ga skupaj sprejela Parlament in Svet, odločitev o tem sprejeti, če za to glasuje večina poslancev Parlamenta.
The Rapporteur considers that in proceedings where Parliament exceptionally decides not to defend the validity of a legislative act adopted jointly by the Parliament and the Council, the decision should be taken if it secures the votes of a majority of the component Members of Parliament.
To bi bilo v skladu z glasovalnimi zahtevami, ki veljajo, če Parlament zavrne ali spremeni skupno stališče Sveta v skladu s členom 251 Pogodbe o ES.
This would be in line with voting requirements in place when Parliament rejects or amends the common position of the Council under Article 251 of the EC Treaty.
Glede na to, da zahteva po absolutni večini ne bi bila mogoča v skladu s členom 198 Pogodbe o ES, pa poročevalec predlaga izreden postopek, kjer se zadeva najprej posreduje konferenci predsednikov – organu, v katerem se odraža večinsko mnenje poslancev Parlamenta –, medtem ko bi moralo dokončno odločitev sprejeti plenarno zasedanje kot vrhovni organ Parlamenta.
However, given that applying the absolute majority requirement would not be possible under Article 198 of the EC Treaty, the Rapporteur suggests an exceptional procedure where the matter is initially referred to the Conference of Presidents, a body reflecting the majority opinion of the component Members of Parliament, whilst Plenary, as Parliament's supreme body, should take the final decision.
Opozoriti je treba, da konferenca predsednikov v primeru, ko se odloči predložiti ugotovitve, s katerimi zagovarja veljavnost akta, deluje v skladu s predhodno odločitvijo s plenarnega zasedanja, ki je bila sprejeta v postopku soodločanja.
It should be noted that where the Conference of Presidents decides to submit observations in order to defend the validity of an act, it acts on the basis of an earlier plenary decision taken in the codecision procedure.
Zato ni potrebe, da se zadeva ponovno posreduje plenarnemu zasedanju.
Hence, there is no need to refer the matter again to Plenary.
Če konferenca predsednikov meni, naj Parlament izjemoma ne zagovarja pravne veljavnosti akta, je treba zadevo posredovati plenarnemu zasedanju, saj lahko le Parlament razveljavi svojo prejšnjo odločitev.
But where the Conference of Presidents takes the view that Parliament should, exceptionally, not defend the legal validity of an act, the matter would have to be referred to Plenary, as only the House can overturn its previous decision.
Poročevalec predlaga, da bi moral imeti predsednik možnost, da v izjemnih primerih, ko Odbor za pravne zadeve ne more predložiti svojega priporočila v roku, sprejme previdnostne ukrepe, če je to potrebno za spoštovanje rokov, ki jih zahteva Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti.
In exceptional cases where the Committee on Legal Affairs is not in a position to deliver its recommendation in time, the Rapporteur suggests that the President should be able to take precautionary action in order to comply with the deadlines required by the Court of Justice.
To bi utegnilo na primer veljati za nedavno uveden postopek nujnega predhodnega odločanja glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice – uporablja se od 1. marca 2008 –, ki predvideva krajši rok za predložitev pisnih ugotovitev.
This could, for instance, be the case in the recently introduced urgent preliminary ruling procedure in the freedom, security and justice area – applicable as from 1 March 2008 –, which provides for a shorter period for the submission of written observations.
Cilj zadnjega odstavka novega člena 121(4) je torej zagotoviti postopek za tiste primere, kjer je treba odločitev nujno sprejeti, ne samo v primeru, ko Sodišče uporabi pospešeni ali nujni postopek, ampak tudi takrat, ko se postopek iz člena 121(4) ne more uporabiti iz razlogov, povezanih z razporedom dela Parlamenta.
Hence, the aim of the last subparagraph of the new Rule 121(4) is to provide for a procedure for those cases where a decision has to be taken urgently, not only where the Court of Justice applies the expedited or urgent procedure, but also where the procedure provided for in the new Rule 121(4) cannot be applied for reasons related to the parliamentary calendar.
V takih primerih bi moral biti predsednik sposoben predložiti ugotovitve brez predhodnega posvetovanja s pristojnim odborom.
In such cases, the President should be able to submit observations without prior consultation with the committee responsible.
Vendar se lahko pristojni odbor odloči o primerni postopkovni ureditvi, da lahko svoja priporočila posreduje pravočasno.
Nevertheless, the committee responsible can decide on appropriate procedural arrangements so as to transmit its recommendation in time.
Ta možnost je pojasnjena z razlago v predlogu spremembe, ki ga je sprejel Odbor za ustavne zadeve.
This possibility is clarified by means of an interpretation contained in the amendment adopted by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs.
o enakosti med ženskami in moškimi – 2008
on Equality between women and men - 2008
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................12
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS..............12
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................18
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION................................18
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................21
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................21
1. , ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o enakosti med spoloma – 2008 ( KOM(2008)0010 ) („poročilo Komisije o enakosti med spoloma“) ter letnih poročil iz prejšnjih let ( KOM(2001)0179 , KOM(2002)0258 , KOM(2003)0098 , KOM(2004)0115 , KOM(2005)0044 , KOM(2006)0071 in KOM(2007)0049 ),
1. ,– having regard to the report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on equality between women and men - 2008 ( COM(2008)0010 ) ("the Commission report on equality"), and the annual reports of the former years ( COM(2001)0179 , COM(2002)0258 , COM(2003)0098 , COM(2004)0115 , COM(2005)0044 , COM(2006)0071 and COM(2007)0049 ),
– ob upoštevanju Načrta za enakost med ženskami in moškimi 2006–2010 ( KOM(2006)0092 ),
– having regard to the Roadmap for equality between women and men 2006-2010 ( COM(2006)0092 ),
– ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2000 o določitvi programa v zvezi z okvirno strategijo Skupnosti za enakost spolov (2001/51/ES)
- having regard to Council Decision 2001/51/EC of 20 December 2000 establishing a Programme relating to the Community framework strategy on gender equality
UL L 17, 19.11.2001, str.
OJ L 17, 19.11.2001, p.22.
UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.25. , zlasti člena 16(1) te uredbe,
OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.25. , in particular Article 16(1) thereof,
– ob upoštevanju evropskega pakta za enakost med spoloma, ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet v Bruslju 23. in 24. marca 2006,
– having regard to the European Pact for Gender Equality adopted by the Brussels European Council of 23 and 24 March 2006,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o priseljevanju žensk: vloga in mesto priseljenk v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 24 October 2006 on women’s immigration: the role and the place of immigrant women in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. aprila 2007 o položaju invalidnih žensk v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 26 April 2007 on the situation of women with disabilities in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. marca 2007 o načrtu za doseganje enakosti med ženskami in moškimi (2006–2010)
– having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2007 on a roadmap for equality between women and men (2006-2010)
UL C 301 E, 13.12.2007, str.
OJ C 301 E, 13.12.2007, p.56. ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 27. septembra 2007 o enakosti med ženskami in moškimi v Evropski uniji – 2007
– having regard to its resolution of 27 September 2007 on equality between women and men in the EU - 2007
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. januarja 2008 o vlogi žensk v industriji
– having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2008 on the role of women in industry
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0019 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0019 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. marca 2008 o položaju žensk na podeželskih območjih EU
– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2008 on the situation of women in rural areas of the EU
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0094 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0094 . ,
– – ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. marca 2008 o posebnem položaju zapornic in vplivu prestajanja zaporne kazni staršev na družabno in družinsko življenje
– having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2008 on the particular situation of women in prison and the impact of the imprisonment of parents on social and family life
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA-PROV(2008)0102 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA-PROV(2008)0102 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov in mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6–0325/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0325/2008 ),
A. ker je enakost med ženskami in moškimi temeljno načelo Evropske unije, priznano v Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ter v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, in ker kljub precejšnjemu napredku na tem področju ostajajo številne neenakosti med ženskami in moškimi,
A. whereas equality between women and men is a fundamental principle of the EU, recognised by the Treaty establishing the European Community and by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, whereas in spite of the significant progress made in this field, many inequalities between women and men remain,
B. ker je nasilje nad ženskami glavna ovira za enakost med ženskami in moškimi in je ena od najbolj razširjenih kršitev človekovih pravic, ki ne pozna geografskih, socialnih ali ekonomskih omejitev; ker je število žensk, ki so žrtve nasilja, zelo zaskrbljujoče,
B. whereas violence against women is a major hindrance to equality between women and men and is one of the most widespread human rights violations, knowing no geographical, economic, or social limits; whereas the number of women who are victims of violence is alarming,
C. ker izraz "nasilje nad ženskami" pomeni vsako dejanje nasilja na podlagi spola, zaradi katerega ženske utrpijo oziroma lahko utrpijo izgubo ali so žrtve fizičnega, spolnega ali psihičnega trpljenja, vključno z grožnjo s tovrstnimi dejanji, prisilo ali samovoljnim odvzemom prostosti, bodisi v javnem ali v zasebnem življenju,
C. whereas the term “violence against women” is to be understood as any act of gender-based violence which results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or psychological harm to or suffering of women, including threats of such acts, coercion, or the arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or private life,
D. ker je trgovina z ljudmi za spolno izkoriščanje nesprejemljivo kršenje človekovih pravic in zakonodaje ter sodobna oblika suženjstva, tesno povezana z drugimi oblikami kriminalitete, ki močno razvrednoti vsa prizadevanja za dosego enakosti med ženskami in moškimi,
D. whereas trafficking in human beings for sexual exploitation is an unacceptable violation of human rights and law, and is a modern form of slavery closely linked to other forms of criminality, which significantly undermines all efforts for achieving equality between women and men,
E. ker spodbujanje podjetniške politike prilagodljivosti na trgu dela ne sme že od samega začetka temeljiti na potrebah podjetij ali javnih uprav, ampak mora politika prilagodljivosti upoštevati zlasti čas, ki ga ženske in moški potrebujejo za resno sprejemanje svojih obveznosti v družini,
E. whereas the promotion of a flexible enterprise policy on the labour market must not focus primarily on the requirements of companies or public administrations, but must first and foremost take as its starting point the time that women and men need to be able to take seriously their respective duties within their families ,
F. ker v evropski politiki zaposlovanja ni več posebnih smernic, povezanih z enakostjo med spoloma, niti stebra za zagotavljanje enakih možnosti,
F. whereas neither specific gender guidelines nor the equal opportunities pillar remains in the European employment strategy,
G. ker razkorak med spoloma v zaposlovanju kaže, da med ženskami in moškimi še vedno obstajajo razlike s kvalitativnega in kvantitativnega vidika,
G. whereas gender gaps in employment indicate persistence of both qualitative and quantitative disparities between women and men,
H. ker je od leta 2003 razlika v plačah še vedno 15-odstotna in se je od leta 2000 zmanjšala samo za eno odstotno točko,
H. whereas the pay gap has remained steady at 15% since 2003 and has narrowed by only one percentage point since 2000,
I. ker se razlikovanje med ženskami in moškimi v sektorjih in poklicih ne zmanjšuje, v nekaterih državah pa se celo povečuje,
I. whereas sectoral and occupational segregation between women and men is not diminishing and is even increasing in certain countries,
J. ker je udeležba žensk v odločanju odločilen pokazatelj enakosti med ženskami in moškimi in ker je število žensk na vodilnih položajih v podjetjih in na univerzah še vedno nizko, v politiki ali raziskovanju pa narašča zelo počasi,
J. whereas women's participation in decision making is a decisive indicator of equality between women and men; whereas the presence of female managers in companies and universities remains slight and the number of female politicians and researchers is rising only very slowly,
K. ker stereotipi, ki še vedno obstajajo glede izobraževalnih in poklicnih možnosti žensk, pomagajo ohranjati neenakosti,
K. whereas the stereotypes which still exist with regard to the educational and occupational options available to women help to perpetuate inequalities,
L. ker je lizbonske cilje o ustvarjanju rasti in spodbujanju socialnega tržnega gospodarstva mogoče uresničiti le s polno uporabo velikega potenciala žensk na trgu dela,
L. whereas the Lisbon targets on generating growth and promoting the social market economy can be met only by making full use of the significant potential of women in the labour market,
M. ker obstaja tveganje „prisilnega“ dela s skrajšanim delovnim časom, zlasti za ženske, ki je pogosto vsiljena izbira zaradi pomanjkanja cenovno dostopnega otroškega varstva,
M. whereas there is a risk of 'enforced' part-time work, particularly for women, a choice often forced on them by a lack of affordable childcare facilities,
N. ker številni izzivi in težave prizadenejo ženske pogosteje kot moške, zlasti kakovost zaposlitve, položaj zakoncev, ki pomagajo na nekaterih področjih, kot so kmetijstvo ali ribolov in mala družinska podjetja, zdravje in varnost na delovnem mestu in zaščita materinstva ter večja nevarnost revščine,
N. whereas a number of challenges and difficulties affect women more than men, notably quality of employment, the situation of ‘helping’ spouses in areas such as agriculture or fisheries and small family businesses, health and safety at work and maternity protection, as well as their being at a higher risk of poverty,
O. ker so stopnje zaposlenosti za ženske in moške nižje na podeželju in poleg tega veliko žensk ni aktivnih na uradnem trgu dela in zato niso registrirane kot brezposelne, niti niso vključene v statistiko brezposelnosti, kar vodi do posebnih finančnih in pravnih težav v zvezi s pravico do materinstva in bolniškega dopusta, pridobitvijo pokojninske pravice in dostopom do socialne varnosti, kot tudi v primeru razveze zakonske zveze; ker na podeželje slabo vpliva pomanjkanje visoko kakovostnih delovnih mest,
O. whereas, for both men and women, employment rates are lower in rural areas, and, in addition, a lot of women are never active in the official labour market and, therefore, are neither registered as unemployed nor included in unemployment statistics, which leads to particular financial and legal problems in relation to the right to maternity and sick leave, the acquisition of pension rights and access to social security, as well as problems in the event of divorce; whereas rural areas are badly affected by the lack of high-quality employment opportunities,
P. ker so vidni znaki, da se slabšajo pogoji nekaterih skupin žensk, ki se pogosto soočajo s številnimi prepletenimi težavami in tveganji ter dvojno diskriminacijo – zlasti invalidk, žensk, ki skrbijo za vzdrževane osebe, starejših žensk, pripadnic manjšin in priseljenk,
P. whereas the conditions of some groups of women who often face several combined difficulties and risks as well as double discrimination – in particular disabled women, women with dependants, elderly women, minority and immigrant women – show signs of deterioration,
Q. ker med ženskami in moškimi še naprej obstajajo razlike v vseh ostalih vidikih kakovosti dela, npr. v usklajevanju poklicnega in zasebnega življenja, delovnih pogojih, v katerih znanje ljudi ni popolnoma izkoriščeno, ter na področju zdravja in varnosti pri delu; ker je stopnja zaposlenosti žensk z vzdrževanimi otroki le 62,4 %, v primerjavi s stopnjo zaposlenosti moških, ki znaša 91,4 %; ker je za udeležbo žensk na delovnem trgu še vedno zelo značilen velik in naraščajoč delež dela s skrajšanim delovnim časom – 31,4 % v EU-27 leta 2007 v primerjavi z le 7,8 % za moške – in je 76,5 % vseh delavcev s skrajšanim delovnim časom žensk; ker so pogodbe o začasni zaposlitvi pogostejše za ženske (15,1 %, eno odstotno točko več kot za moške); ker je dolgotrajna brezposelnost še vedno veliko bolj pogosta med ženskami (4,5 %) kot med moškimi (3,5 %),
Q. whereas gaps between women and men persist in all other aspects of work quality, e.g. reconciling professional and private life, working arrangements which do not fully exploit people’s skills and in the field of health and safety at work; whereas the employment rate for women with dependent children is only 62.4%, compared with 91.4% for men; whereas women's participation in the labour market is still largely characterised by a high and increasing share of part-time work — 31.4% for women in the EU-27 in 2007 compared to only 7.8% for men - and 76.5 % of all part-time workers are women; whereas temporary employment contracts are also more common for women (15.1%, one percentage point more than for men); whereas long-term unemployment is still much more common among women (4.5%) than men (3.5%),
R. ker je tveganje za revščino večje za ženske kot za moške, zlasti po 65. letu starosti (21 % ali 5 odstotnih točk več kot za moške),
R. whereas the risk of falling into poverty is higher for women than for men, especially for the over-65s (21%, or 5 percentage points more than men),
S. ker usklajevanje poklicnega, družinskega in zasebnega življenja ostaja nerešeno vprašanje za ženske in moške,
S. whereas the reconciliation of professional, family and private lives remains an unresolved issue for women as well as for men,
T. ker imajo socialni partnerji pomembno vlogo pri opredelitvi in učinkovitem izvajanju ukrepov za enakost med moškimi in ženskami na evropski, nacionalni, regionalni in sektorski ravni ter na ravni podjetij,
T. whereas the social partners play an important role in defining and effectively implementing actions for gender equality at the European, national, regional, sectoral and corporate levels,