natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice menijo, da takšen razvoj ne bo nastal le na podlagi delovanja skupnega trga, ki bo dajal prednost usklajevanju socialnih sistemov, marveč tudi na podlagi postopkov, predvidenih v tej pogodbi, in približevanja določb zakonov ali drugih predpisov.
They believe that such a development will ensue not only from the functioning of the common market, which will favour the harmonisation of social systems, but also from the procedures provided for in this Treaty and from the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da predložena direktiva obravnava pravice pacientov, in da ni treba, da so pacienti delavci (pacient je v členu 4(f) predloga direktive opredeljen kot vsaka fizična oseba, ki prejme ali želi prejemati storitve zdravstvenega varstva v državi članici), in ob upoštevanju, da je v uvodu predloga direktive navedeno, da zajema naslednje oblike storitev zdravstvenega varstva: uporaba zdravstvenega varstva v tujini (tj. pacient gre na zdravljenje k izvajalcu zdravstvenega varstva v drugi državi članici) – to je znano tudi kot „mobilnost pacientov“; čezmejno zagotavljanje zdravstvenega varstva (tj. prenos storitve z ozemlja ene države članice na ozemlje druge); kot so na primer storitve telemedicine, diagnosticiranje in zdravniški recept na daljavo, laboratorijske storitve; trajna navzočnost izvajalca zdravstvenega varstva (tj. ustanovitev izvajalca zdravstvenega varstva v drugi državi članici) in začasna prisotnost oseb (tj. mobilnost zdravstvenih delavcev, na primer začasen premik v državo članico pacienta zaradi izvajanja storitev), ne sodi na področje uporabe člane 136, ki obravnava spodbujanje zaposlovanja, izboljšanje življenjskih razmer in delovnih pogojev, tako da se ob ohranjanju izboljšav omogočijo njihova uskladitev, ustrezna socialna zaščita, dialog med socialnimi partnerji, razvoj človeških virov za trajno visoko zaposlenost in boj proti izključenosti.
In view of the fact that the proposed directive is concerned with “patients’ rights” and patients need not be workers ("patient" is defined as "any natural person who receives or wishes to receive healthcare in a Member State" in Article 4(f) of the proposal for a directive) and bearing in mind that, according to the preamble, the proposed directive is to cover “the following modes of supply of healthcare: – Use of healthcare abroad (i.e.: a patient moving to a healthcare provider in another Member State for treatment); this is what is referred to as 'patient mobility'; – Cross-border provision of healthcare (i.e.: delivery of service from the territory of one Member State into the territory of another); such as telemedicine services, remote diagnosis and prescription, laboratory services; – Permanent presence of a healthcare provider (i.e.: establishment of a healthcare provider in another Member State); and, – Temporary presence of persons (i.e.: mobility of health professionals, for example moving temporarily to the Member State of the patient to provide services)”, it does not fall within the scope of Article 136, which is concerned with the promotion of employment, and improved living and working conditions, so as to make possible their harmonisation while the improvement is being maintained, proper social protection, dialogue between management and labour, the development of human resources with a view to lasting high employment and the combating of exclusion.
Ker je člen 152 že bil zavrnjen kot pravna podlaga, se ne more uporabiti skupaj s členom 137, ki sam po sebi ni ustrezna pravna podlaga za predlog direktive.
Given that Article 152 has already been rejected as the legal basis, it cannot be used in conjunction with Article 137, which is itself not suitable as a legal basis for the proposal for a directive.
Edina možna pravna podlaga je člen 95.
The sole legal basis possible is Article 95 alone.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je v skladu s tem na svoji sej 12. februarja 2009 u 8 glasovi za, 5 proti in 1 vzdržanim
At its meeting of 12 February 2009 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, by 8 votes in favour, 5 votes against, with 1 abstention
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Alin Lucian Antochi (predsedujoči), Rainer Wieland (podpredsednik), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (podpredsednica), Francesco Enrico Speroni (podpredsednik), Monica Frassoni (poročevalka), Sharon Bowles, Brian Crowley, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Alain Lipietz, Manuel Medina Ortega, Georgios Papastamkos, Aloyzas Sakalas in Jaroslav Zvěřina. sklenil, da priporoči, naj predlog direktive temelji na členu 95 Pogodbe o ES.
The following were present for the final vote: Alin Lucian Antochi (acting Chair), Rainer Wieland (Vice-Chair), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (Vice-Chair), Francesco Enrico Speroni (Vice-Chair), Monica Frassoni (rapporteur), Sharon Bowles, Brian Crowley, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Alain Lipietz, Manuel Medina Ortega, Georgios Papastamkos, Aloyzas Sakalas, Jaroslav Zvěřina. , to recommend that the proposal for a directive should be based on Article 95 of the EC Treaty.
Predlagana direktiva se uporablja za zagotavljanje zdravstvenega varstva ne glede na to, kako je organizirano, kako se izvaja ali financira.
The proposed directive applies to the provision of healthcare, regardless of how it is organised, delivered or financed.
Odbor EMPL na splošno podpira njen namen.
Generally the EMPL Committee supports the aim of the proposed directive.
Poudarja, da je nujno treba zagotoviti jasne informacije in pregleden okvir za zagotavljanje čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v Evropski uniji, da se bodo državljani lahko preudarno odločali.
It stresses that, for citizens to be able to make a deliberate choice, it is of the utmost importance to ensure clear information and a transparent framework for the provision of cross-border healthcare within the EU.
Poleg tega mora biti oskrba varna in kakovostna.
Furthermore, the provided care should be safe and of good quality.
Glede na to, da morajo pacienti sami vnaprej plačati zdravljenje, morajo biti postopki za povračilo stroškov jasni in pregledni.
Given that patients have to pay themselves for the treatment upfront, the procedures for reimbursement of costs should be clear and transparent.
Odbor EMPL je glede na svoje naloge posebno pozornost namenil naslednjim točkam:
The EMPL Committee has, given its tasks, paid specific attention to the following points:
Uredbe za usklajevanje sistemov socialne varnosti
Regulations for coordination of social security schemes
Namen direktive ni sprememba obstoječega okvira za usklajevanje sistemov socialne varnosti; ta bo ostal v veljavi z vsemi splošnimi načeli, na katerih temeljijo uredbe o usklajevanju sistemov socialne varnosti.
The aim of the directive is not to modify the existing framework for coordination of social security schemes and this framework will remain in place with all the general principles on which the regulations on coordination of social security schemes are based.
Odbor EMPL to podpira, vendar se mu zdi nenavadno, da so za povrnitev stroškov v primerjavi s pravili iz uredbe o usklajevanju predlagana ločena pravila.
The EMPL Committee supports this, but finds it strange that for the reimbursement of the costs, compared to the rules in the regulation on the coordination, separate rules are proposed.
Glavni razlog za zaskrbljenost je, da bo potreben nov administrativni sistem, zaradi česar bi prišlo do nepotrebnega in neželenega povečanja birokracije ter nejasnih pravil.
The main cause of concern is that a new administrative system will be needed, thus leading to an unnecessary and unwanted raise in ´red tape´ and unclear rules.
Odbor EMPL zaradi tega predlaga, da bi se za povračilo stroškov uporabljala enaka pravila, kot so določena v uredbi.
Therefore the EMPL Committee proposes to apply the same rules for the reimbursement of the cost as put down in the regulation.
Okvir za vzajemno priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij
Framework for mutual recognition of professional qualifications
Ta predlog prav tako ne bi posegal v obstoječi okvir za vzajemno priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, uveden z Direktivo 2005/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij.
The proposal would also apply without prejudice to the existing framework for mutual recognition of professional qualifications established by the Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications.
Odbor EMPL to v celoti podpira.
This fully supported by the EMPL Committee.
Rasna enakost
Racial equality
Odbor EMPL poudarja, da bi moral biti med glavnimi cilji te direktive enak dostop za vse.
The EMPL Committee stresses that equal access for all should be one of the main targets of this directive.
V mnenju je poudarjen splošni pomen zagotavljanja uporabnih in jasnih informacij pacientom glede kakovosti oskrbe (vključno z informacijami o bolnišnicah).
The opinion stresses the general importance of giving useful and clear information to the patients with regard to the quality of the care (including information regarding the hospitals).
Poudarjeno je tudi, da je pomembno poznati specializacijo ter rezultate izvajalcev storitev zdravstvenega varstva, zato da je mogoče sprejeti preudarno odločitev, katera bolnišnica bi bila najboljša za posameznega pacienta, ter oblikovati seznam centrov odličnosti v Evropi.
The importance of knowing what are the specialisations and results of the healthcare providers is also stressed; this in order to be able to make a deliberate choice on which hospital would be the best for a specific patient and to be able to establish a list of centres of excellence within Europe.
V zvezi z zbiranjem podatkov in spremljanjem (člen 18) je poudarjeno, da bi moralo biti zbiranje podatkov v pomoč pri ocenjevanju, ali je bil z direktivo dosežen cilj izboljšanja zdravstvenega varstva na splošno ter natančneje, ali podpira načelo dostopa za vse.
With regard to the data collection, monitoring (article 18) it is stresses that the collection of the data should help in assessing if the Directive accomplishes the aim of improving the quality of the healthcare in general and more specific if it supports the principle of access for all.
V poročilih, omenjenih v členu 20, bi to morala biti ena od glavnih točk.
Within the reports mentioned in (article 20) this should be one of the focus points.
V zvezi z opredelitvami odbor EMPL v uvodnih izjavah poziva Komisijo in države članice k obravnavi priznanega dobrodejnega učinka zdraviliškega zdravljenja na okrevanje in ohranjanje zdravja ljudi.
With respect to the definitions the EMPL Committee calls, in the recitals, on the Commission and Member States to consider the recognition of the positive impact of thermal cures on the convalescence and on preserving people's health.
V uvodnih izjavah je omenjen tudi enak dostop do evropskih referenčnih središč.
Also in the recitals attention has been paid to the equal access to ´European Centres of Reference´.
· Liberalizacija zdravstvenih storitev bi lahko povzročila večjo neenakost pri dostopu do kakovostnega zdravstvenega varstva.
· The liberalisation of health services which could lead to greater inequality of access to high-quality health care.
· Razvoj kakovostnega, na skupnosti temelječega zdravstvenega varstva v sodelovanju z uporabniki in pacienti ima lahko pomembno vlogo pri boju proti revščini in socialni izključenosti.
· The development of a high quality, community-based health care in cooperation with users and patients, which can play an important role in the fight against poverty and social exclusion;
· Razlike v zdravstvenih rezultatih (tako med državami članicami kot v njih) so še vedno velike, zato poziva države članice, naj jih odpravijo, predvsem z zagotovitvijo učinkovitega dostopa do zdravstvenega varstva za vse.
· Inequalities in health outcomes, both between and within Member States, which remain wide and urges Member States to tackle them, notably by ensuring effective access to healthcare for all.
(3a) V sporočilu Komisije z dne 26. februarja 2007 o pregledu stanja družbene realnosti – vmesno poročilo spomladanskemu Evropskemu svetu leta 2007 1 je navedeno, da se kljub temu, da so države članice med najbogatejšimi državami na svetu, pojavljajo novi vzorci revščine in neenakosti, ki ogrožajo zdravje ljudi, na primer porast primerov debelosti in duševnih težav.
(3a) The Commission's Communication of 26 February 2007 on Social Reality Stocktaking - Interim report to the 2007 Spring European Council 1 observed that although the Member States are among the wealthiest countries in the world, new patterns of poverty and inequality affecting people's health are emerging, such as the rise in obesity and mental health problems.
Poudarja, da imata lahko na skupnosti temelječe zdravstveno varstvo in socialno varstvo pomembno vlogo pri boju proti revščini in socialni izključenosti.
Stresses that community-based health and social care can play an important role in the fight against poverty and social exclusion.
(3b) Obstoječa nasprotja med cilji zdravstvene politike in cilji notranjega trga za storitve zahtevajo, da imajo v spornih primerih vedno prednost cilji zdravstvene politike kot najpomembnejši razlogi splošnega pomena (tj. javno zdravje, socialni cilji, ohranjanje finančnega ravnovesja sistema socialne varnosti itd.).
(3b) The existing disparities between health-policy objectives and objectives of the internal market in services makes it necessary, where a conflict arises, always to assign priority to health-policy objectives as overriding reasons relating to the public interest (i.e. public health, social-policy objectives, preservation of the financial balance of the social security system, etc.).
Na ta način je med drugim zagotovljeno, da imajo prednost cilji zdravstvene politike in da je možno doseči cilj Komisije glede izboljšanja zdravstvene oskrbe.
This will ensure, inter alia, that health-policy objectives have priority and that the Commission's aim of improving health care can be achieved.
(3c) Bela knjiga Komisije z dne 23. oktobra 2007 z naslovom „Skupaj za zdravje: strateški pristop EU za obdobje 2008–2013“ 1 vzpostavlja prvo zdravstveno strategijo za dejavnosti Skupnosti na področju zdravja.
(3c) The Commission White Paper of 23 October 2007, entitled Together for Health: A Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013 1 sets out a first EC Health Strategy for Community activities in health.
Sporočilo temelji na zavezanosti držav članic in Skupnosti, da spoštujejo skupne vrednote in načela zdravstvene politike.
The Communication is based on the commitment by the Member States and the Community to respect the common values and principles of health policies.
Parlament je v svoji resoluciji poudaril, da je zdravje ključno socialno in politično vprašanje, od katerega je odvisna prihodnost Evropske unije.
The resolution of the Parliament stresses that health is one of the key social and political issues on which the future of the European Union depends.
(4a) Storitve zdravstvenega varstva in splošne socialne storitve imajo temeljno vlogo v evropskem socialnem modelu, vendar je v nekaterih državah članicah zanje namenjenih premalo sredstev.
(4a) Healthcare services and general social services play a fundamental role in the European social model but receive inadequate funding in certain Member States.
Komisija in države članice bi se morale zavedati te temeljne vloge pri uporabi prava na področju notranjega trga in konkurence.
The Commission and Member States should recognise that fundamental role when applying internal market and competition law.
Potrditev splošnih izhodiščnih točk pri razpravi o sistemu zdravstvenega varstva.
Reaffirms the general starting points when discussing the healthcare system.
(4b) Storitve zdravstvenega varstva in splošne socialne storitve imajo temeljno vlogo v evropskem socialnem modelu, vendar je v nekaterih državah članicah zanje namenjenih premalo sredstev.
(4b) Healthcare services and general social services play a fundamental role in the European social model but receive inadequate funding in certain Member States.
Države članice in Komisija bi morale to temeljno vlogo storitev zdravstvenega varstva pri oblikovanju vseh zakonodajnih predpisov bolj upoštevati.
The Member States and the Commission should take better account of this fundamental role of healthcare services in all law-making.
(4c) Liberalizacija zdravstvenih storitev bi lahko povzročila večjo neenakost pri dostopu do kakovostnega zdravstvenega varstva, zato ni cilj te direktive.
(4c) The liberalisation of health services could lead to greater inequality of access to high-quality health care and is therefore not the aim of this Directive.
(4d) Kakovostno, na skupnosti temelječe zdravstveno varstvo, ki se po možnosti razvija v sodelovanju z uporabniki in pacienti, ima lahko pomembno vlogo pri boju proti revščini in socialni izključenosti.
(4d) High-quality, community-based health care, developed, where possible, in cooperation with users and patients, could play an important role in the fight against poverty and social exclusion.
To je eden glavnih delov resolucije, omenjene v uvodni izjavi 1.
This is one of the central elements of the resolution mentioned in recital 1.
(4e) Razlike v zdravstvenih rezultatih tako v samih državah članicah kot med njimi so še vedno velike.
(4e) Inequalities in healthcare outcomes, both between and within Member States, remain wide.
Države članice bi jih morale odpraviti, zlasti z zagotovitvijo učinkovitega dostopa do zdravstvenega varstva za vse.
Member States should tackle those inequalities, in particular by ensuring effective access to healthcare for all.
Bistvena sestavina vseh politik o zdravstvenem varstvu bi moral biti cilj, da se zagotovi dostop za vse.
Cornerstone of all policies that involve healthcare should have the aim of ensuring access for all.
(5) Kot je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti večkrat potrdilo, so v področje uporabe Pogodbe zajete vse vrste zdravniške oskrbe , ob upoštevanju njihove posebne narave.
(5) As confirmed by the Court of Justice on several occasions, while recognizing their specific nature, all types of medical care fall within the scope of the Treaty .
(5) Kot je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti večkrat potrdilo, zdravstvene storitve, opravljene proti plačilu, spadajo v področje uporabe določb Pogodbe ES o svobodi opravljanja storitev , ob upoštevanju njihove posebne narave.
(5) As confirmed by the Court of Justice on several occasions, while recognizing their specific nature, medical services provided for consideration fall within the scope of the EC Treaty's provisions on the freedom to provide services .
Glede na to, da se direktiva izrecno ukvarja s prostim pretokom storitev, se je treba sklicevati na ustrezne določbe Pogodbe ES.
Given the fact that the Directive specifically deals with free movement of services, it is important to refer to the relevant EC Treaty provisions.
Predlog spremembe tudi opredeljuje – v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti – da zdravstvene storitve, opravljene proti plačilu, spadajo v okvir teh določb Pogodbe ES (glej npr. zadevo C-372/04, Watts, odstavek 86).
The amendment also specifies - in accordance with settled ECJ case-law - that medical services fall within the ambit of these EC Treaty provisions if they are provided for consideration (see e.g. C-372/04, Watts, par 86).
(8) zagotoviti pravila za dostop do varnega in visokokakovostnega zdravstvenega varstva v drugi državi članici in vzpostaviti mehanizme sodelovanja na področju zdravstvenega varstva med državami članicami ob popolnem upoštevanju pristojnosti držav članic pri njegovi organizaciji in izvajanju v skladu z načeli enotnega dostopa, solidarnosti, cenovne dostopnosti, enake fizične dostopnosti in demokratičnega nadzora.
(8) This directive aims to provide rules for the access to safe and high-quality healthcare in another Member State and establish cooperation mechanisms on healthcare between Member States, in full respect of national competence in organising and delivering healthcare, in accordance with the principles of universal access, solidarity, affordability, equal territorial accessibility and democratic control.
Direktiva popolnoma upošteva pristojnosti držav članic glede zdravstvenega varstva v skladu s Pogodbo, vključno z opredeljevanjem koristi socialne varnosti v zvezi z zdravjem ter organizacijo in izvajanjem zdravstvenega varstva in zdravniške oskrbe ter ugodnostmi socialne varnosti zlasti v primeru bolezni.
It fully respects the responsibilities of the Member States for healthcare according to the Treaty, including for the definition of social security benefits related to health and the organisation and delivery of healthcare and medical care and social security benefits in particular for sickness.
(8)Cilj te direktive je vzpostaviti splošni okvir za izvajanje varnega, visoko kakovostnega in učinkovitega čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v Skupnosti ter zagotavljanje mobilnosti pacientov in pravice opravljanja zdravstvenega varstva in visoke ravni varovanja zdravja, ob popolnem upoštevanju pristojnosti držav članic pri opredeljevanju koristi socialne varnosti v zvezi z zdravjem ter organizaciji in izvajanju zdravstvenega varstva in zdravniške oskrbe ter ugodnosti socialne varnosti zlasti v primeru bolezni.
(8)This directive aims to establish a general framework for provision of safe, high quality and efficient cross-border healthcare in the Community and to ensure patients mobility and freedom to provide healthcare and high level of protection of health, whilst fully respecting the responsibilities of the Member States for the definition of social security benefits related to health and the organisation and delivery of healthcare and medical care and social security benefits in particular for sickness.
(8) Cilj te direktive je vzpostaviti splošni okvir za izvajanje varnega, visoko kakovostnega in učinkovitega čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v Skupnosti ter zagotavljanje mobilnosti pacientov , boljše uravnoteženosti med pacientovimi individualnimi pravicami v zvezi z mobilnostjo in ohranjanjem nacionalnih regulativnih pristojnosti, kar koristi vsem, in pravice opravljanja zdravstvenega varstva in visoke ravni varovanja zdravja, ob popolnem upoštevanju pristojnosti držav članic pri opredeljevanju koristi socialne varnosti v zvezi z zdravjem ter organizaciji in izvajanju zdravstvenega varstva in zdravniške oskrbe ter ugodnosti socialne varnosti zlasti v primeru bolezni.
(8) This directive aims to establish a general framework for provision of safe, high quality and efficient cross-border healthcare in the Community and to ensure patients mobility , a better balance between patients' individual rights in relation to mobility and the maintenance of national regulatory capabilities, for the benefit of all, and freedom to provide healthcare and high level of protection of health, whilst fully respecting the responsibilities of the Member States for the definition of social security benefits related to health and the organisation and delivery of healthcare and medical care and social security benefits in particular for sickness.
(9a) Pri opredelitvi zdravstvenega varstva bi morale Komisija in države članice upoštevati priznavanje dobrodejnega učinka zdraviliškega zdravljenja na okrevanje in ohranjanje zdravja ljudi.
(9a) In defining healthcare, the Commission and Member States should consider recognising the positive impact of thermal cures on convalescence and health maintenance.
Ta predlog spremembe je povezan s predlogom spremembe 2.
This amendment is linked to amendment 2.
Zdraviliško zdravljenje ima lahko pomembno vlogo pri preprečevanju in odpravljanju zdravstvenih težav.
Thermal cures can play an important role in preventing health problems but also in solving them.
Države članice, Komisija in zdravstvene zavarovalnice bi morale preučiti vrednost, ki izhaja iz tovrstnih določb.
Member States, Commission and healthcare insurance companies should investigate the values added by these kinds of provisions.