natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
G. ker sta zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji Varnostnega sveta ZN št. 1503(2003) in št. 1534(2004) pozvali sodišče in Mednarodno kazensko sodišče za Ruando, naj končata vse preiskave do konca leta 2004, vse sodne obravnave prve stopnje do konca leta 2008, in vse delo do leta 2010; ker pa je sodišče navedlo, da ne bo uspelo zaključiti sodnih obravnav prve stopnje pred koncem leta 2009, tudi zaradi mnogih prizivov; ker je torej potreben nov sklep Varnostnega sveta ZN, ki bo podaljšal mandat sodišča,
G. whereas the above-mentioned UN Security Council resolutions 1503 (2003) and 1534 (2004) called on the Tribunal and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to complete all investigations by the end of 2004, all first-instance trials by the end of 2008, and all work by 2010; whereas, however, the Tribunal has indicated that it will be unable to complete the first-instance trials before late 2009, also because of the great number of appeals; whereas, therefore, a new decision of the UN Security Council is needed in order to extend the mandate of the Tribunal,
H. ker je sodišče začelo s pobudo oblikovanja načrta, ki je dobil podporo Varnostnega sveta ZN, ki je postal poznan kot „zaključna strategija“ in katerega namen je zagotoviti, da se poslanstvo sodišča zaključi uspešno, pravočasno in usklajeno s pravnimi sistemi zadevnih držav,
H. whereas the Tribunal has taken the initiative of devising a plan which was endorsed by the UN Security Council and has become known as the "completion strategy", the purpose of which is to ensure that it concludes its mission successfully, in a timely way and in coordination with domestic legal systems in the countries concerned,
I. ker je načrt sestavljen iz treh faz in ciljnih datumov za dokončanje mandata sodišča in ker je sedanji cilj dokončanje vseh postopkov (sodnih obravnav in prizivov) do leta 2011 z manjšim zamikom v leto 2012; ker se je za dosego teh rezultatov sodišče osredotočilo na najvišje voditelje, ki so osumljeni, da so odgovorni za zločine, ki so se dogajali na območju, za katerega je sodišče pristojno, medtem ko je zadeve, v katerih so obtožene osebe na srednji ali nižji ravni odgovornosti, preneslo na pristojna nacionalna sodišča, ter ker si je prizadevalo za skupna sojenja obtožencem, čeprav je treba zagotoviti, da združitev tožb ne krati pravic obtožencev; ker imajo nacionalni tožilci in sodišča možnost sami začeti in obravnavati številne primere in tako tudi ravnajo, vendar nekatera nacionalna sodišča morda niso sposobna ali pripravljena voditi kazenskih postopkov v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi in normami nepristranskega sojenja, prenos na nacionalna sodišča pa je v nekaterih primerih naletel na nasprotovanje neposredno udeleženih žrtev in prič,
I. whereas the plan consists of three phases and target dates for the completion of the Tribunal's mandate, and whereas the current goal is to complete all proceedings (trials and appeals) by 2011, with a slight spill-over into 2012; whereas, in order to achieve these results, the Tribunal is focussing on the most senior leaders suspected of being responsible for crimes committed within its jurisdiction, has transferred cases brought against intermediate and low-level accused to competent national jurisdictions, and has pursued joint trials of defendants, although care must be taken to ensure that joinder does not impinge on the rights of the accused; whereas national prosecutors and courts can and are also initiating and handling numerous cases themselves, but some national courts may be unable or unwilling to conduct criminal proceedings in accordance with international standards and norms of fair trial, and transfer to national courts has in some cases been met with resistance from victims and witnesses directly involved ,
J. ker trije sodni senati in pritožbeni senat sodišča še vedno delujejo v polni meri in obravnavajo zadeve z več obtoženimi; ker je imelo prepuščanje zadev pristojnim nacionalnim sodiščem velik vpliv na celotno delovno obremenitev sodišča, vendar so dejavniki, nad katerimi nima nadzora, povzročili določene zamude, prav tako pa ni mogoče izključiti dodatnih nepredvidenih zamud,
J. whereas the three Trial Chambers and an Appeals Chamber of the Tribunal have maintained full productivity and are hearing multi-accused cases; whereas the referral of cases to competent national jurisdictions has had a substantial impact on the overall workload of the Tribunal, but whereas factors beyond its control have caused certain delays and further unforeseen delays cannot be ruled out,
K. ker je treba privesti pred sodišče tudi preostala obtoženca, Ratka Mladića in Gorana Hadžića, in ker bo njuno prijetje odvisno od obveznega sodelovanja držav z sodiščem v skladu s členom 29 sodišča, vključno z iskanjem, prijetjem in premestitvijo ubežnikov ter s predložitvijo dokaznega gradiva, ki se nahaja na primer v domačih arhivih, in ker ni vedno prišlo do prijetja in premestitve ubežnih obtožencev ter predložitve dokaznega gradiva,
K. whereas, too, the two remaining indictees, Ratko Mladić and Goran Hadžić, must be brought to justice, and whereas their apprehension will depend on the mandatory cooperation of States, pursuant to Article 29 of the Statute of the Tribunal, including in the search for, arrest and transfer of fugitives as well as the production of evidence located in, for example, domestic archives, and whereas the arrest and transfer of fugitive indictees and the production of evidence have not always been forthcoming,
L. ker člen 21 statuta sodišča predvideva, da ima vsak obtoženi pravico do navzočnosti na sojenju, in ker sodišče ne bi moglo voditi postopka v odsotnosti (in absentia), četudi bi razpolagalo z obilnim dokaznim gradivom,
L. whereas Article 21 of the Statute of the Tribunal provides for the right of any accused person to be tried in his presence and whereas the Tribunal would not be able, even if it were in possession of abundant evidence, to proceed in absentia,
M. ker se priznava zaveza sodišča k hitremu dokončanju svojega mandata, vendar sodne obravnave zadev, ki še niso zaključene, ne smejo potekati pod nerazumnim časovnim pritiskom, saj bi tovrstni pritisk lahko vplival na pravico obtoženih do nepristranske obravnave; ker ni mogoče sprejeti nobenih bližnjic, ki bi lahko še bolj ogrozile varnost in dobro počutje žrtev in prič, ki pričajo pred sodiščem, in ker ciljni datum, predviden v zaključni strategiji sodišča, ne bi smel pomeniti nekaznovanja za preostala osumljenca na begu ali neustreznega časovnega pritiska za obravnave, ki so v teku,
M. whereas the commitment of the Tribunal to the expeditious completion of its mandate is recognised, but whereas the outstanding cases must be tried without being subject to unrealistic time pressures, since such pressures might prejudice the right of the accused to a fair trial; whereas no shortcuts can be taken that might further jeopardise the safety and wellbeing of victims and witnesses testifying before the International Tribunal, and whereas the target date envisaged for the Tribunal's completion strategy cannot mean impunity for the two remaining fugitives or undue time pressures for the ongoing trials,
(a) opozarja na dejstvo, da je ena od temeljnih vrednot, ki se odraža v odločitvi mednarodne skupnosti o ustanovitvi sodišča, iskanje pravice in boj proti nekaznovanosti; ob popolni podpori delu, ki ga opravlja sodišče, poudarja, da to ne bo v celoti dokončano, če sojenj, ki so v teku, ne bo mogoče dokončati brez nepotrebne naglice in če ne bosta preostala obtoženca, Ratko Mladić in Goran Hadžić, pripeljana pred sodišče in se jima bo sodilo;
(a) recalls the fact that one of the fundamental values reflected in the international community's decision to create the Tribunal was the quest for justice and the fight against impunity; while fully supportive of the work the Tribunal is doing, points out that this will not be fully achieved unless on-going trials can be concluded without undue haste and the two remaining indictees, Ratko Mladić and Goran Hadžić, are brought to justice and tried;
(b) poudarja, da si ne bi smeli prizadevati za hitrost obravnavanja na račun zahtev zakonitega postopka, in ponovno opozarja na mnenje, ki je postalo splošno sprejeto, da se dediščine sodišča ne bo merilo le po tem, ali bo uspelo soditi odgovornim za najhujše zločine na območju, za katero je pristojno, temveč tudi po tem, ali bo ta sojenja izvedlo v skladu z najstrožjimi standardi pravičnosti;
(b) stresses that the quest for increased speed of proceedings should not be pursued at the expense of due process, and reiterates the now commonly shared view that the legacy of the Tribunal will be measured not only by whether it succeeds in judging those responsible for the most serious crimes falling under its jurisdiction but also by whether it does so in accordance with the strictest standards of fairness;
(d) poudarja, da po eni strani datum, določen za dokončanje zaključne strategije, prispeva k večjemu tempu dela sodišča, vendar po drugi strani ta datum nikakor ne more predstavljati končnega roka za dejavnosti sodišča, če se res išče pravica in če naj se sojenje Ratku Mladiću in Goranu Hadžiću res zgodi;
(d) underlines the fact that, on the one hand, the date fixed for achievement of the completion strategy contributes to the productivity of the Tribunal, but that, on the other hand, if justice is to be done and the trial of Ratko Mladić et Goran Hadžić is to proceed, that date cannot in any way constitute a deadline for the activities of the Tribunal;
(e) zato poziva Svet, naj nujno prouči, če bi bilo treba predvideti podaljšanje mandata sodišča za dve leti in če bi bilo to dovolj, ob upoštevanju, da bi bilo treba vsako podaljšanje ocenjevati tudi po rezultatih in ne le po času, ter naj predlaga preučitev teh vprašanj v ustreznih strukturah Združenih narodov;
(e) therefore calls on the Council to examine as a matter of urgency whether a two-year extension of the mandate of the Tribunal should be envisaged and whether this would be sufficient, bearing in mind that any extension should be measured not solely in terms of time but against results, and to advance examination of these issues within the appropriate UN structures;
(f) poziva Svet, naj spodbudi Varnostni svet ZN, da se bo zavezal k zagotovitvi zadostnih sredstev in podpore sodišču v splošnem proračunu ZN do konca mandata sodišča;
(f) calls on the Council to encourage the UN Security Council to commit itself to providing sufficient resources and support to the Tribunal through the general budget of the UN until the end of the Tribunal's mandate;
(g) poziva Svet, naj nadaljuje s podporo prizadevanjem sodišča, da bi zadevne države prepričalo, naj okrepijo sodelovanje in svoja prizadevanja za aretacijo preostalih obtožencev in tako omogočijo sodišču, da izpolni svoj mandat, in naj se skupaj z Združenimi narodi jasno prepriča, da je treba zelo jasno določiti, da je treba preostalima ubežnikoma soditi pred sodiščem ali preostalimi mehanizmi, da se tako prepreči vsaka domneva o nekaznovanosti;
(g) urges the Council to continue to support the Tribunal's efforts to get the countries in question to enhance cooperation and expedite efforts to capture the two remaining indictees, thereby allowing the Tribunal to fulfil its mandate, as well as to clarify with the UN that it must be made very clear that the two remaining fugitives must be tried by either the Tribunal or by the residual mechanisms, therefore avoiding any suggestion of impunity;
(h) poziva Svet, naj hrvaške oblasti opozori na očitno pomanjkanje sodelovanja pri predaji osrednjih dokumentov, ki so bistveni za obtožbo generala Anteja Gotovine, Mladena Markaća in Ivana Cermaka; poudarja, da je treba izpolniti nedavne pozive glavnega tožilca sodišča Sergea Brammertza k iskanju in predaji zadevne manjkajoče dokumentacije;
(h) calls on the Council to raise with the Croatian authorities the apparent lack of co-operation in handing over key documents vital for the prosecution of General Ante Gotovina, Mladen Markać and Ivan Cermak; stresses that recent calls made by the Tribunal's Chief Prosecutor Serge Brammertz for relevant missing documentation to be located and be made available to the Tribunal, should be complied with;
(i) poudarja, da bi morala Evropska unija še naprej poudarjati, da izpolnjevanje köbenhavnskih meril vključuje popolnoma delujoče sodstvo, ki lahko obravnava tudi kršitve humanitarnega prava, tudi po tem, ko okvir sodišča ne bo več deloval; poziva Svet, naj določi jasna merila za ocenjevanje sodstva v državah zahodnega Balkana po koncu mandata sodišča, med drugim zaradi zagotavljanja, da pogoji v zaporih ustrezajo mednarodnim standardom in da se upošteva kazni, ki jih je določilo sodišče, ter poziva EU, naj poveča podporo domačim preiskavam vojnih zločinov in sojenjem zaradi njih, recimo prek pomoči organom pregona, sodnim in tožilskim organom, vključno s sredstvi za usposabljanje in zaščito prič;
(i) points out that the European Union should continue to stress that compliance with the Copenhagen criteria includes having in place a fully functioning judiciary, capable of prosecuting trials for breaches of humanitarian law, even when the framework of the Tribunal is no longer operational; calls on the Council to set forth clear norms for evaluating the performance of the judiciary in the countries of the Western Balkans after the Tribunal's term comes to an end, inter alia so as to ensure that conditions of imprisonment meet international standards and that sentences passed by the Tribunal are adhered to, and calls on the EU to increase its support for domestic war crime investigations and trials, for example through the provision of assistance to law enforcement, judicial and prosecutorial authorities, including funding for training and witness protection;
(j) priznava, da vrhovnost držav ostaja temeljni kamen mednarodnega sistema, in opozarja, da je bistvenega pomena, da tudi mednarodna skupnost podpira razvoj domačih zmogljivosti na Balkanu, da bi lahko lokalna sodišča nadaljevala delo, s katerim je začelo sodišče; podpira sedanje financiranje EU, na primer za programe osveščanja v okviru evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice; v zvezi s tem poziva Svet, naj prouči povečanje svoje podpore za strategijo nadaljevanja sodišča, in poziva h krepitvi sodelovanja med sodnimi in tožilskimi organi na zahodnem Balkanu, zlasti v primerih, ki obravnavajo izročitve in vzajemno pravno pomoč;
(j) recognises that the pre-eminence of States remains a cornerstone of the international system, and points out that it is essential that the international community, too, support the development of domestic capacity in the Balkans so that the local courts can continue the work the Tribunal has started; supports the existing financing by the EU of, for example, outreach programmes under the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights; in this context, calls on the Council to consider an increase in its support for the continuation strategy of the Tribunal, and calls for increased cooperation between the judicial and prosecutorial bodies in the Western Balkans, in particular in cases involving extradition and mutual legal assistance;
(k) ugotavlja, da bo obstoj jasnega mehanizma za opravljanje preostalih funkcij sodišča po tem, ko bo to ukinjeno, bistvenega pomena za zagotavljanje, da bo dediščina tega sodišča krepila načela, ki so bila v izhodišču njegove ustanovitve;
(k) notes that having a clear mechanism in place to deal with the Tribunal's residual functions once it has been wound down will be central to ensuring that its legacy is one which reinforces the principles that inspired its establishment;
(l) poziva Svet, naj v okviru ustreznih struktur Združenih narodov brez odlašanja začne s postopkom, predvidenim za oblikovanje mehanizma za obravnavanje takojšnjih in dolgoročnih preostalih funkcij, kot so zaščita prič, varstvo prič pred zastraševanjem, vprašanje nespoštovanja sodišča, revizije postopkov v primeru prejetja razbremenilnih dokazov, spremljanje sojenj, ki so bila prepuščena regiji (trenutno jih spremlja tožilstvo sodišča prek Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi (OVSE)), pogoji v zaporih ter vprašanja, povezana s pomilostitvami ali spremembami kazni, itd.; predlaga, da se Varnostnemu svetu Združenih narodov posreduje predlog za morebitno ustanovitev skupnega urada, ki bi v prihodnosti opravljal preostale funkcije sodišča, Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za Ruando in Posebnega sodišča za Sierro Leone;
(l) invites the Council to pursue without delay, within the appropriate UN structures, the procedures envisaged for a mechanism for dealing with the immediate and longer-term residual functions, such as witness protection, protection from witness intimidation, contempt of court issues, reviews in the event of exculpatory evidence being received, monitoring of trials referred to the region (currently monitored by the Tribunal's Prosecution Service through the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)), conditions of imprisonment and issues relating to pardon or commutation of sentences, etc; suggests that a proposal be put to the UN Security Council for the possible setting-up of a joint office to deal with the future residual functions of the Tribunal and of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the Special Court for Sierra Leone;
(m) opozarja Svet, da bi morala EU posebno pozornost posvetiti varovanju dediščine sodišča, in sicer z zagotavljanjem, da se njegovi arhivi shranijo na ustreznem kraju, po možnosti na zahodnem Balkanu, da so čim bolj popolni in dostopni ter da je dokumentacija dostopna prek svetovnega spleta;
(m) reminds the Council that the EU should take a particular interest in securing the legacy of the Tribunal by ensuring that its archives are safely stored in a suitable location, possibly in the region of the Western Balkans, that they are as complete and as accessible as possible, and that documentation is accessible on the world-wide web;
2. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu ter v vednost Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Varnostnemu svetu Združenih narodov in predsedniku Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the United Nations Security Council and the President of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA ( B6-0417/2008 )
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION ( B6‑0417/2008 )
ki ga vlagajo Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Sarah Ludford in Jelko Kacin
by Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Sarah Ludford and Jelko Kacin
– ob upoštevanju resolucij 1503 in 1504 Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov in načrtov, da bi Mednarodno kazensko sodišče za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo prenehalo delovati do konca leta 2010,
– having regard to resolutions 1503 and 1504 of the UN Security Council and the plans to wind down the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia by the end of 2010,
– ob upoštevanju dejstva, da ubežniki ostajajo na svobodi,
– having regard to the fact that fugitives remain at large,
– ob upoštevanju znatne in dosledne podpore Evropske unije in njenih držav članic mednarodnemu kazenskemu sodišču in dejstva, da je popolno sodelovanje s sodiščem postalo osrednje merilo za politiko EU do držav zahodnega Balkana,
– having regard to the considerable and consistent support for the Tribunal from the European Union and its Member States and to the fact that full cooperation with the Tribunal has become a central benchmark in the EU's policy towards the countries in the Western Balkans,
A. poudarja, da je sodišče že veliko prispevalo k procesu sprave na zahodnem Balkanu,
A. underlining that the Tribunal has already made a significant contribution to a process of reconciliation in the Western Balkans,
B. vseeno upošteva, da delo sodišča še vedno ni končano in da je treba preostale zadeve preučiti brez časovnega pritiska,
B. considering, however, that the work of the Tribunal is still unfinished and that the remaining cases must be examined without time pressure,
(a) nujno je treba preučiti možnosti za podaljšanje mandata sodišča, da bi bilo mogoče vse sodne postopke, ki potekajo pred njim, preučiti brez neprimerne naglice ter da bi se lahko pred sodišče privedli preostali obtoženi vojnih zločinov in bi o njihovih zadevah potekalo sojenje;
(a) urgently explore possibilities to extend the mandate of the Tribunal so that all the ongoing trials can be examined without undue haste and the remaining indicted war criminals can be brought to justice and the cases against them tried;
(b) oblikovati je treba strategijo o tem, kako obravnavati preostale ubežnike, če Združenim narodom ne bi uspelo podaljšati mandata sodišča;
(b) devise a strategy on how to deal with remaining fugitives should the UN fail to extend the mandate of the Tribunal;
(c) pojasniti je treba, kako bo EU presojala delovanje sodnega sektorja v državah zahodnega Balkana po morebitnem koncu mandata sodišča in kakšne ukrepe lahko sprejme EU, da bi povečala podporo domačim preiskavam vojnih zločinov in s tem povezanim sojenjem;
(c) clarify how the EU will judge the performance of the justice sector in the countries of the Western Balkans after the possible end of term of the Tribunal and what measures the EU can take to increase support for domestic war crime investigations and trials;
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 1/2009 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009
on Draft amending budget No 1/2009 of the European Union for the financial year 2009
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU.....................................................................7
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE ...........................................................................7
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 1/2009 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, Oddelek III – Komisija
on Draft amending budget No 1/2009 of the European Union for the financial year 2009, Section III – Commission
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, kot je bil dokončno sprejet dne 18. decembra 2008
– having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009, as finally adopted on 18 December 2008
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0622 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0622 . ,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2009 k splošnemu proračunu za leto 2008, ki ga je Komisija predložila dne 23. januarja 2009 ( KOM(2009)0022 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 1/2009 of the European Union for the financial year 2008, which the Commission presented on 23 January 2009 ( COM(2009)0022 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2009, ki ga je Svet pripravil dne xxx 2009 (6952/2009 – C6‑0075/2009 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 1/2009, which the Council established on xxx 2009 (6952/2009 – C6‑0075/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0113/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0113/2009 ),
A. ker predlog spremembe proračuna št. 1 k splošnemu proračunu za leto 2009 vključuje naslednje postavke:
A. whereas Draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget 2009 covers the following items:
– uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada EU v višini 11,8 milijonov EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil, ki se nanašajo na posledice poplav, ki so prizadele Romunijo julija leta 2008,
– Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund for an amount of EUR 11,8 million in commitment and payment appropriations relating to the effects of the floods that hit Romania in July 2008,
– ustrezno zmanjšanje odobritev plačil v višini 11,8 milijona EUR v proračunski vrstici 13 03 16 – Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ERDF) – konvergenca,
– A corresponding reduction in payment appropriations of EUR 11,8 million from line 13 03 16 - European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)-Convergence,
B. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2009 uradna vključitev teh proračunskih sprememb v proračun za leto 2009,
B. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 1/2009 is to formally enter these budgetary adjustments into the 2009 budget,