natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Po potrebi bodo ti na podlagi tuje registrske tablice poiskali zavarovatelja stranke iz tujine in ustreznega pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov.
They will trace the foreign party’s insurer and their relevant claims representative by the foreign registration plate, if necessary.
Splošno so vsi informacijski centri dosegljivi po telefonu ali elektronski pošti, vendar ima veliko informacijskih centrov tudi svoje spletne strani, na katerih lahko stranka dobi ustrezne informacije.
All information centres can be reached over the phone or by email in general, but a lot of information centres have also set up their own websites to inform the consumer accordingly.
Pomembne informacije stalno posodabljajo.
The relevant information is continuously updated.
Če zavarovanec v primeru čezmejne nesreče pokliče v svojo zavarovalnico, mu ta pogosto pomaga tako, da posreduje kontaktne podatke ustreznega informacijskega centra.
If the insured calls his own insurance company in case of a cross-border accident, the insurance company frequently assists him with the contact details of the relevant information centre.
Zaupanje potrošnikov bi se okrepilo, če bi države članice poiskale primerne ukrepe in potrošnikom zagotovile kontaktne podatke nacionalnih informacijskih centrov, kadar potrebujejo dodatne informacije.
Consumer confidence would be raised if Member States would find appropriate measures to provide the consumers with the contact details of the national information centres, if there is the need for additional consumer information.
Poleg tega je treba v okviru predpogodbenih informacij potrošnikom zagotoviti celovite informacije o načinu delovanja sistema pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, možnosti njegove uporabe in prednostih, ki jih ima ob njegovi uporabi zavarovana stranka.
In addition, as part of the pre-contractual information package, consumers should receive comprehensive information of how the claims representative system works and what are its uses and benefits to the insured party.
V skladu s statističnimi podatki je več kot 90 % vseh primerov urejenih z izvensodnimi poravnavami, stroški postopka pa so v veliko držav članic povrnjeni.
Numbers show that more than 90% of all cases are settled out-of-court and legal costs reimbursed in many Member States.
V novih državah članicah nastajajo novi trgi, ki se stalno širijo.
Markets in the new Member States are emerging and steadily growing.
Vendar je na številnih trgih zavarovanje stroškov postopka relativno novo, zato ga je treba spodbujati.
However, in number of them, legal expenses insurance is a relatively new product which needs to be promoted.
Ozaveščenost javnosti v novih državah članicah o zavarovanju stroškov postopka je majhna, zato jo je treba izboljšati.
Public awareness about legal expenses insurance remains low in new Member States therefore there is a need to raise awareness.
Glavno vprašanje v zvezi s tem je, ali naj se uvede obvezno zavarovanje stroškov postopka v celotni EU oziroma ali naj se ohrani prostovoljno zavarovanje stroškov postopka kot učinkovito in zanesljivo rešitev.
The main issue here is whether to introduce compulsory legal expenses insurance throughout the EU, or keep voluntary legal expenses insurance as a reliable and effective solution.
Prva možnost ima prednosti predvsem za potrošnike v novih državah članicah.
The first option has some advantages, especially for consumers in new Member States.
S to možnostjo bi se moralo okrepiti zaupanje potrošnikov zlasti v zvezi z iskanjem pravnih sredstev, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da je veliko potrošnikov novih držav članic pozornih na visoke pravne stroške.
It should increase consumer confidence particularly when seeking legal redress, given that many new Member State consumers are wary of expensive legal fees.
Vendar bi bila zaradi tega sodišča še bolj obremenjena, primeri pa bi bili bolj zapleteni, pri čemer bi bilo zato verjetno tudi več zamud v zvezi z reševanjem sporov ter večji delež neupravičenih odškodninskih zahtevkov, višje premije zlasti v državah, kjer ponujajo zavarovatelji cenejše kritje, ki še ne vključuje zavarovanja stroškov postopka.
However, this would create an additional and more complex workload for Courts, corresponding delays in the resolution of disputes, potentially a higher percentage of unjustified claims, higher premiums, especially in countries where insurers currently propose cheaper cover which does not already include any legal expenses insurance.
Najpomembnejše je, da bi zato potrošniki odklanjali izvensodne poravnave zahtevkov.
Most importantly, it would create a disincentive for claims to be settled out of court.
Poleg tega bi se delovanje trga za zavarovanje stroškov postopka destabiliziralo.
In addition the functioning legal expenses insurance market would be destabilised.
To pomeni, da bi negativni učinki uvajanja sistema obveznega zavarovanja stroškov postopka presegli morebitne prednosti.
As a whole, the negative effects of introducing a system of compulsory legal expenses insurance would outweigh the potential benefits.
Zlasti v novih državah članicah je treba sprejeti nadaljnje ukrepe za ozaveščenost v zvezi z zavarovanjem pravne varnosti.
Further steps are needed for raising awareness on legal protection insurance, particularly in the new Member States.
Potrošniki morajo biti obveščeni o prednostih ponudbe in takšnega zavarovanja.
Consumers should be informed about the advantages of being offered and having this insurance cover.
Nacionalni regulativni organi imajo bistveno vlogo pri izvajanju najboljših praks iz drugih držav članic.
The role of national regulatory bodies for implementation of best practices from other Member States is crucial.
Za ustrezen razvoj nacionalnih trgov so pomembne javne kampanje nacionalnih organov, zasebnega zavarovalnega sektorja in potrošniških organizacij.
Public campaigns by national authorities, the private insurance industry and consumer organisations, are important for the adequate development of national markets.
Posredniki bi morali potrošnike obvezno obveščati o morebitnih tveganjih in potrebi po zavarovanju stroškov postopka.
Intermediaries should be obliged to inform the customer about possible risks and the need of legal expenses insurance.
Poleg tega je treba spodbujati države članice, ki nimajo vzpostavljenih alternativnih sistemov za reševanje sporov v zvezi s poravnavami zahtevkov, da vzpostavijo take sisteme, ki temeljijo na najboljših praksah iz drugih držav članic.
In addition to this, those Member States that do not have established alternative dispute resolution systems in place for settling claims, should be encouraged to introduce best-practice models from other Member States.
A. ker so čezmejna potovanja z avtomobilom v porastu zaradi prostega pretoka ljudi v Evropi in ker se zaradi tega še bolj potrebujejo jasna in uporabna pravila za zaščito žrtev prometnih nesreč,
A. whereas cross-border car journeys are on the rise, due to the free movement of persons in Europe, and clear, functional rules on the protection of victims of road accidents are therefore all the more necessary,
B. ker trenutno države članice sprejemajo različne sisteme v zvezi z vprašanji glede zavarovanja avtomobilske odgovornosti in se zato zahteva analiza Komisije, v kateri bi sodelovali nacionalni organi,
B. whereas at present, the Member States adopt different systems with regard to motor insurance-related issues and therefore an analysis by the Commission is required, with the assistance of the national authorities,
C. ker so posvetovanja z nacionalnimi organi, med katerimi so tudi organi novih držav članic, potrdila ustreznost obstoječih sankcij (kjer so bile sprejete) in njihovo učinkovito izvajanje v celotni Evropski uniji,
C. whereas the consultations held with the national authorities, including those of the new Member States, have confirmed that, where they exist, the applicable penalties are valid and applied effectively throughout the European Union,
1. poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo učinkovitost predvidenih sankcij, ki se izvršijo v primeru neupoštevanja trimesečnega roka za predložitev utemeljenega odgovora na odškodninski zahtevek ali utemeljene ponudbe za odškodnino;
Calls on the Member States to ensure that in the event of non-compliance with the three-month deadline for submitting a reasoned reply to the claim for compensation or a reasoned offer of compensation, the penalties introduced are effective;
4. zahteva, naj Komisija ne sodi prenagljeno o izidih naročenih študij o različnih odškodninah za telesne poškodbe na podlagi sprejete uredbe Rim II
Asks that the Commission should not prejudge the outcome of the studies commissioned in relation to differential personal injury damages following on from the adoption of the Rome II Regulation
40). , študij, ki bi lahko predlagale zavarovalno rešitev in s tem spremembo četrte direktive o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti
40). , which studies may suggest an insurance-based solution and consequent amendment of the 4th Motor Insurance Directive
Direktiva 2000/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. maja 2000 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti (UL L 181, 20. julij 2000, str.
Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 May 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (OJ L 181, 20 July 2000, p.
6. meni, da je pomembno ohraniti zavarovanje stroškov postopka na prostovoljni osnovi, da se tako upoštevajo posebnosti različnih nacionalnih trgov; želi, da bi države članice in Evropska komisija podpirale poznavanje takšnega načina zavarovanja prek primernih obveščevalnih kampanj, in da bi spodbudile svobodno opravljanje storitev te vrste, da se tako spodbudi kroženje modelov, ki izhajajo iz najboljših praks drugih držav članic.
Considers it advisable to keep legal expenses insurance on a voluntary basis in order to respect the specific features of the various national markets; hopes that the Member States and the Commission will promote knowledge of such a form of insurance via appropriate information campaigns and that they will stimulate freedom to provide such a service in order to encourage the dissemination of models based on the best practices of other Member States.
o vesolju in varnosti
on Space and security
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................17
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............17
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................20
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................19
– ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije z naslovom „Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu“, ki jo je Evropski svet odobril 12. decembra 2003,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy entitled ‘A secure Europe in a better world’, adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003,
– ob upoštevanju strategije EU proti širjenju orožja za množično uničevanje, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 12. decembra 2003,
– having regard to the EU Strategy against proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta z dne 22. maja 2007 o evropski vesoljski politiki,
– having regard to the Council resolution of 22 May 2007 on the European Space Policy,
– ob upoštevanju pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in pogodbe o Evropski uniji, kakor sta bili spremenjeni z lizbonsko pogodbo, ter njunih ustreznih določb o evropski vesoljski politiki (člen 189 pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije), ter ob upoštevanju trajnega strukturiranega sodelovanja pri vprašanjih v zvezi z varnostjo in obrambo (člena 42(6) in 46 pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter povezanega protokola), okrepljenega sodelovanja na civilnem področju (del 6, naslov III pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije), solidarnostne klavzule (člen 222 pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije) ter klavzul o medsebojni pomoči v primeru oboroženega napada na državo članico ali države članice (člen 42(7) pogodbe o Evropski uniji);
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the Treaty on European Union (TEU), as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon, and their relevant provisions on European space policy (Article 189 of the TFEU), permanent structured cooperation on security and defence matters (Articles 42(6) and 46 of the TEU and a related protocol) and enhanced cooperation in the civilian area (Part Six, Title III of the TFEU), as well as the solidarity clause (Article 222 of the TFEU) and mutual assistance provisions in the event of armed aggression against a Member State or States (Article 42(7) of the TEU),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. januarja 2004 o akcijskem načrtu za izvajanje evropske vesoljske politike
– having regard to its resolution of 29 January 2004 on the action plan for implementing the European space policy
UL C 96 E, 21.04.05, str.
OJ C 96 E, 21.4.2005, p.
UL C 33 E, 09.02.06, str.
OJ C 33 E, 9.2.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o načelih, ki urejajo dejavnosti držav pri raziskovanju in rabi vesolja, vključno z Luno in drugimi nebesnimi telesi, iz leta 1967 („pogodba o vesolju“),
– having regard to the 1967 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies ("the Outer Space Treaty"),
– ob upoštevanju sodelovanja med EU in Rusijo v vesoljski politiki, v okviru katerega je bil leta 2006 vzpostavljen tristranski dialog o vesolju med Evropsko komisijo, Evropsko vesoljsko agencijo in rusko vesoljsko agencijo Roscosmos,
– having regard to the EU-Russia cooperation on space policy creating in 2006 the Tripartite Space Dialogue between the European Commission, the European Space Agency and Roscosmos (the Russian Space Agency),
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to the Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0250/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0250/2008 ),
A. ker morata biti prepoved groženj iz vesolja ter varen in trajen dostop do vesolja in razpolaganje z njim vodilni načeli evropske vesoljske politike,
A. whereas freedom from space-based threats and secure sustainable access to, and use of, space must be the guiding principles of the European Space Policy,
B. ker razni politični in varnostni izzivi, s katerimi se Evropska unija vse pogosteje srečuje, narekujejo strateško potrebo po vzpostavitvi avtonomne evropske vesoljske politike,
B. whereas the various political and security challenges which the European Union is increasingly facing make an autonomous European Space Policy a strategic necessity,
C. ker so zaradi pomanjkanja skupnega pristopa držav članic Evropske unije k vesoljski politiki programi predragi,
C. whereas the lack of a common approach to space policy between EU Member States results in overly costly programmes,
D. ker operacije kriznega upravljanja v okviru evropske varnostne in obrambne politike trpijo zaradi pomanjkanja interoperabilnosti med vesoljskimi zmogljivostmi, ki jih upravljajo države članice,
D. whereas the crisis management operations under the framework of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) suffer from a lack of interoperability between space assets operated by EU Member States,
E. ker v Evropski uniji ni celovite evropske vesoljske arhitekture za potrebe varnosti in obrambe,
E. whereas the European Union is lacking a comprehensive European space-based architecture for security and defence purposes,
F. ker je za razvoj nove generacije lansirnikov potrebnih približno 15 let, sedanjo generacijo lansirnikov pa bo treba nadomestiti v prihodnjih 20 letih,
F. whereas the development of a new generation of launchers takes approximately 15 years and the present generation of launchers will need replacing in the next 20 years,
G. ker razvoj vesoljskih zmogljivosti v ZDA, Rusiji, na Japonskem in v drugih državah z nastajajočimi lastnimi vesoljskimi programi, predvsem na Kitajskem, v Indiji, Južni Koreji, na Tajvanu, v Braziliji, Izraelu, Iranu, Maleziji, Pakistanu, Južni Afriki in Turčiji, hitro napreduje,
G. whereas development of space assets by the USA, Russia, Japan and other emerging space-faring states, most notably China, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Brazil, Israel, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan, South Africa and Turkey, is rapidly advancing,
H. ker si bo francosko predsedstvo Evropske unije v drugem polletju leta 2008 za enega od prednostnih ciljev zastavilo napredek v evropski vesoljski politiki,
H. whereas the French Presidency of the European Union during the second semester of 2008 will set out an advancement of the European Space policy as one of its priorities,
I. ker je servisiranje v orbiti eden najbolj stroškovno učinkovitih elementov vesoljske arhitekture in doseganja trajnostnega nabora vesoljskih zmogljivosti, uporabljajoč sredstva, ki so na voljo na licu mesta;
I. whereas one of the most cost-effective elements of a space architecture and of achieving a sustainable fleet of space assets is on-orbit servicing, using in-situ means,
3. odobrava, da je „vesoljski Svet“ EU sprejel evropsko vesoljsko politiko, kot je bila predlagana v skupnem sporočilu Evropske komisije in Evropske vesoljske agencije, zlasti v poglavju o varnosti in obrambi, hkrati pa obžaluje, da v „ključnih vprašanjih za obravnavo pri razvoju strategije mednarodnih odnosov“ (omenjeno v prilogi 3 resolucije Sveta 2007/C 136/01 z dne 21. maja 2007
Welcomes the adoption of the European Space Policy by the "Space Council" as proposed by a joint communication presented by the Commission and the European Space Agency, especially the chapter on security and defence, while regretting the absence of any reference to the threat of weaponisation of space within the "key issues to be considered in the development of a strategy for international relations" (as mentioned in Annex 3 to Council Resolution 2007/C 136/01 of 21 May 2007
UL C 136, 20.06.07, str.
OJ C 136, 20.6.2007, p.
4. ugotavlja, da je pravna podlaga za evropsko vesoljsko politiko vključena v lizbonsko pogodbo; pozdravlja priložnost, ki je bila dana Parlamentu in Svetu, da po rednem zakonodajnem postopku določita ukrepe, potrebne za oblikovanje evropskega vesoljskega programa; poziva Komisijo, da Parlamentu in Svetu predloži ustrezen predlog za te ukrepe, skupaj s sporočilom o vzpostavitvi ustreznih odnosov z Evropsko vesoljsko agencijo; pozdravlja tudi možnosti trajnega strukturiranega sodelovanja pri vprašanjih v zvezi z varnostjo in obrambo ter okrepljeno sodelovanje na civilnem področju;
Notes the inclusion of a legal basis for the European Space Policy in the Treaty of Lisbon; welcomes the opportunity given to it and to the Council to lay down, under the ordinary legislative procedure, the measures needed to shape a European Space Programme; calls on the Commission to submit to it and to the Council an appropriate proposal for such measures, together with a Communication relating to the establishment of appropriate relations with the European Space Agency; also welcomes the possibilities of permanent structured cooperation in security and defence matters and enhanced cooperation in the civilian area;
6. pozdravlja prizadevanja Mednarodne akademije za astronavtiko in Mednarodnega združenja za napredek varnosti v vesolju za spodbujanje sanacije, razumevanja in ukrepov v zvezi z vesoljskimi odpadki;
Applauds the efforts of the International Academy of Astronautics and the International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety to promote remediation, understanding and measures in respect of space debris;
Avtonomna ocena ogroženosti
Autonomous threat assessment
Opazovanje Zemlje in izvidovanje
Earth observation and reconnaissance
11. poudarja, da je Galileo nujen za samostojne operacije evropske varnostne in obrambne politike, za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko, za varnost Evrope in za strateško avtonomnost Unije ; ugotavlja, da bo predvsem njegova regulirana javna storitev ključna na področju navigacije ter določanja položaja in časa, nenazadnje za preprečevanje nepotrebnih tveganj;
11.Underlines the necessity of Galileo for autonomous ESDP operations, for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), for Europe’s own security and for the Union's strategic autonomy; notes that, in particular, its public-regulated service will be vital in the field of navigation, positioning and timing, not least in order to avoid unnecessary risks; 12.
12. je seznanjen z dogovorom o predlogu uredbe o nadaljnjem izvajanju evropskih satelitskih radionavigacijskih programov (EGNOS in Galileo), ki sta ga Parlament in Svet dosegla na prvi obravnavi in ki določa, da bo Skupnost lastnica sistema in da bo uvajalna faza v celoti financirana iz proračuna Skupnosti;
Notes the first reading agreement between Parliament and the Council on the proposal for a regulation on the further implementation of the European satellite radionavigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo), which establishes that the Community is the owner of the system and that its deployment phase is fully financed by the Community budget;
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0167 . , zlasti na dejstvo, da je treba programa EGNOS in Galileo obravnavati kot enega od dosežkov prihodnjega evropskega programa o vesolju, ter na upravljanje programov, vključno z medinstitucionalnim odborom za program Galileo, ki se lahko uporabi kot model pri razvoju evropske politike o vesolju;
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0167 . , in particular, to the fact that the EGNOS and Galileo programmes should be considered as one of the achievements of the future European Space Programme, and to the governance of the programmes, together with the Galileo Interinstitutional Panel, which may serve as a model in the development of a European Space Policy;
Nadzorovanje vesolja
Space surveillance
20. podpira izmenjavo obveščevalnih podatkov s sredstvi zvez (pridobivanje obveščevalnih podatkov z elektronskimi sredstvi, na primer Essaim, in pridobivanje obveščevalnih podatkov s prestrezanjem telekomunikacijskih sporočil) na evropski ravni;
Supports the exchange of signal intelligence (electronic intelligence such as "Essaim" and communications intelligence) at European level;
Avtonomen dostop do vesolja in mednarodnega okolja
Autonomous access to space and international environment
25. priporoča, da se servisiranje v orbiti vzpostavi kot oblika podpore za izboljšanje vzdržljivosti, trajnosti, dostopnosti in operativne učinkovitosti dejavnih vesoljskih zmogljivosti, obenem pa za zmanjšanje izrabe zmogljivosti in stroškov vzdrževanja;
Recommends that on-orbit servicing be established as a means of support to enhance the endurance, persistence, availability and operational efficiency of operational space assets and, at the same time, to reduce asset deployment and maintenance costs;
29. poudarja, da so v proračunu EU za skupne evropske vesoljske dejavnosti predvideni odhodki v višini približno 5,25 milijarde evrov za obdobje 2007-2013, kar znaša povprečno 750 milijonov evrov na leto;
Points out that the EU budget commits expenditure amounting to approximately EUR 5.25 billion in the years 2007-2013 on common European space activities, resulting in an average expenditure of EUR 750 million per year over that period;
33. opozarja na izkušnje, ki kažejo, da se obsežnih skupnih projektov ne da ustrezno upravljati, če je vanje vpletenih 27 različnih nacionalnih proračunskih oblasti, ki sledijo načelu o „primerni donosnosti”; zato toplo priporoča, da se projekti in programi financirajo iz proračuna EU;
Points out that, as experience has shown, large-scale common projects cannot be properly managed when 27 different national budget authorities applying the principle of "fair return" are involved; therefore strongly recommends that these projects and programmes be financed from the EU budget;