natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izločitev letov, opravljenih na podlagi pravil vizualnega letenja, bi lahko spodbudila tovrstno izkoriščanje v škodo varnosti v letalstvu.
Giving exemption of flights performed under visual flight rules could encourage operations of this kind to the detriment of air safety.
Sedanja izločitev lahkih letal že upošteva večino letov, opravljenih na podlagi pravil vizualnega letenja.
The existing exemption for light aircraft already covers most of the flights performed under visual flight rules.
PRILOGA, TOČKA 1, TOČKA (C) Priloga I, odstavek 2, razpredelnica - nova kategorija (e) (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 1, POINT (C) Annex I, paragraph 2, table - new Category (e) (Directive 2003/87/EC)
PRILOGA, TOČKA 1, TOČKA (C) Priloga I, odstavek 2, razpredelnica - nova kategorija (f) (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 1, POINT (C) Annex I, paragraph 2, table - new Category (f) (Directive 2003/87/EC)
(f) letov, ki se izvajajo izključno za namene preverjanja ali preizkušanja opreme , ki se uporablja ali se namerava uporabljati kot zemeljsko sredstvo za zračno navigacijo, razen dostavnih letov zadevnih zrakoplovov ; in
(f) flights performed exclusively for the purpose of checking or testing equipment used or intended to be used as ground aids to air navigation excluding positioning flights by the aircraft concerned ; and
(f) letov, ki se izvajajo izključno za namene preverjanja , preizkušanja ali certificiranja letal ali zemeljske opreme ter za prevažanje novih letal ; in
(f) flights performed exclusively for the purpose of checking , testing or certifying aircraft or ground equipment, and ferrying new aircraft ; and
Ti leti morajo biti enakovredni letom v skladu s točkama (d) in (e).
Such flights should be equated with the flights referred to at (d) and (e).
PRILOGA, TOČKA 1, TOČKA (C) Priloga I, odstavek 2, razpredelnica - nova kategorija (g) (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 1, POINT (C) Annex I, paragraph 2, table - new Category (g) (Directive 2003/87/EC)
(g) letov, ki se izvajajo z zrakoplovi s potrjeno največjo vzletno maso, manjšo od 5 700 kg .
(g) flights performed by aircraft with a certified maximum take-off weight of less than 5 700kg .
(g) letov, ki se izvajajo z zrakoplovi s potrjeno največjo vzletno maso, manjšo od 20.000 kg .
(g) flights performed by aircraft with a certified maximum take-off weight of less than 20 000 kg .
Mejno vrednost je treba zvišati na vrednost, ki jo je Komisija sprva načrtovala, saj takšna letala povzročajo manj kot 1 % emisij v letalstvu in bi njihova vključitev v sistem trgovanja z emisijami za te majhne letalske prevoznike pomenila nesorazmerno upravno breme.
The threshold value should be increased to revert to the value originally planned by the Commission, since such aircraft produce less than 1% of aviation emissions and since their inclusion in the emissions trading scheme would cause a disproportionately heavy administrative burden for these small aircraft operators.
PRILOGA, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (B) Priloga IV, del B, razdelek Nadzor nad podatki o tonskih kilometrih za namen člena 3d, odstavek 1 (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 2, POINT (B) Annex IV, Part B, section 'Monitoring of tonne-kilometre data for the purpose of Article 3d', paragraph 1 (Directive 2003/87/EC)
Za dodeljevanje pravic v skladu s členom 3d(1) se količina letalskih dejavnosti izračuna v razpoložljivih tonskih kilometrih z naslednjo formulo:
For the purpose of applying for an allocation of allowances in accordance with Article 3d(1), the amount of aviation activity shall be calculated in available tonne-kilometres using the following formula:
Za ohranjanje in krepitev teritorialne povezanosti Evropske unije osnova za izračun ne sme biti koristni tovor letala (opravljeni tonski kilometri – RTK), ampak njegova zmogljivost (razpoložljivi tonski kilometri, ATK).
In order to maintain and strengthen territorial cohesion in the European Union, the basis for the calculation model should not be the aircraft payload ('revenue tonne kilometre - RTK') but the aircraft capacity ('available tonne kilometre - ATK').
PRILOGA, POIN T 2, TOČKA (B) Priloga IV, del B, razdelek Nadzor nad podatki o tonskih kilometrih za namen člena 3d, odstavek 2 (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POIN T 2, POINT (B) Annex IV, Part B, section 'Monitoring of tonne-kilometre data for the purpose of Article 3d', paragraph 2 (Directive 2003/87/EC)
razpoložljivi tonski kilometri = razdalja x koristni tovor
available tonne kilometres = distance x payload
PRILOGA, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (B) Priloga IV, del B, razdelek Nadzor nad podatki o tonskih kilometrih za namen člena 3d, odstavek 5 (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 2, POINT (B) Annex IV, Part B, section 'Monitoring of tonne-kilometre data for the purpose of Article 3d', paragraph 5 (Directive 2003/87/EC)
„koristni tovor“ pomeni skupno maso tovora, pošte in potnikov, ki jih prevaža .
"payload" means the total mass of freight, mail and passengers carried .
„koristni tovor“ pomeni skupno maso tovora, pošte in potnikov, ki jih letalo lahko prepelje .
"payload" means the total mass of freight, mail and passengers which an aircraft is capable of carrying .
PRILOGA, TOČKA 1, TOČKA (B) Priloga IV, del B, razdelek Nadzor nad podatki o tonskih kilometrih za namen člena 3d, odstavek 6, alinea 1 (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 1, POINT (B) Annex IV, Part B, section 'Monitoring of tonne-kilometre data for the purpose of Article 3d', paragraph 6, indent 1 (Directive 2003/87/EC)
– je število potnikov na zrakoplovu število potnikov razen članov posadke;
– the number of passengers shall be the number of persons onboard excluding crew members;
– je število potnikov na zrakoplovu število sedežev razen članov posadke;
– the number of passengers shall be the number of seats onboard excluding crew members;
PRILOGA, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (B) Priloga IV, del B, razdelek Poročanje o podatkih o tonskih kilometrih za namen člena 3d, odstavek B, alinea 1 (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 2, POINT (B) Annex IV, Part B, section 'Reporting of tonne-kilometre data for the purpose of Article 3d', paragraph B, indent 1 (Directive 2003/87/EC)
– številke letov na obeh letališčih,
– Number of flights by airport pair;
Obveznosti poročanja morajo biti omejene na dejansko potrebne podatke.
Reporting requirements should be limited to those which are objectively necessary.
PRILOGA, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (B) Priloga IV, del B, razdelek Poročanje o podatkih o tonskih kilometrih za namen člena 3d, odstavek B, alinea 2 (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 2, POINT (B) Annex IV, Part B, section 'Monitoring of tonne-kilometre data for the purpose of Article 3d', paragraph B, indent 2 (Directive 2003/87/EC)
– število potnikov na obeh letališčih,
– Number of passenger-kilometres by airport pair;
PRILOGA, TOČKA 2, TOČKA (B) Priloga IV, del B, razdelek Poročanje o podatkih o tonskih kilometrih za namen člena 3d, odstavek B, alinea 3 (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 2, POINT (B) Annex IV, Part B, section 'Monitoring of tonne-kilometre data for the purpose of Article 3d', paragraph B, indent 3 (Directive 2003/87/EC)
– število tonskih kilometrov na obeh letališčih,
– Number of tonne-kilometres by airport pair;
PRILOGA, TOČKA 3, TOČKA (B) Priloga V, del B, razdelek Dodatne določbe za preverjanje poročil o emisijah iz letalstva, odstavek 14, pododstavek 2 (novo) (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 3, POINT (B) Annex V, Part B, section 'Additional provisions for the verification of aviation emission reports', paragraph 14, subparagraph 2 (new) (Directive 2003/87/EC)
(2) Institucije Skupnosti in države članice zagotovijo, da se metode, ki jih uporabljajo preveritelji, pred izvajanjem direktive uskladijo in se v praksi enotno uporabljajo.
(2) Community Institutions and the Member States shall ensure that the methods to be used by verifiers are harmonised before the Directive is applied, and that they are applied uniformly in practice.
Delo nacionalnih preveriteljev mora biti enotno urejeno, tudi zato da bi preprečili izkrivljanje konkurence med letalskimi linijami.
The work of the national verifiers should be carried out uniformly, inter alia in order to avoid distortion of competition between airlines.
PRILOGA, TOČKA 3, TOČKA (B) Priloga V, del B, razdelek Dodatne določbe za preverjanje podatkov o tonskih kilometrih, predloženih za namene člena 3d(1), odstavek 17 (novo) (Direktiva 2003/87/ES)
ANNEX, POINT 3, POINT (B) Annex V, Part B, section 'Additional provisions for the verification of tonne-kilometre data submitted for the purposes of Article 3d(1)', paragraph 17 (new) (Directive 2003/87/EC)
(17) Institucije Skupnosti in države članice zagotovijo, da se metode, ki jih uporabljajo preveritelji, pred izvajanjem direktive uskladijo in se v praksi enotno uporabljajo.
(17) Community Institutions and the Member States shall ensure that the methods to be used by verifiers are harmonised before the Directive is applied, and that they are applied uniformly in practice.
Pridruženi odbori
Enhanced cooperation
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sprejetju protokola o spremembi sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (Sporazum TRIPS), podpisanega 6. decembra 2005 v Ženevi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council decision on the acceptance, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol amending the the TRIPS Agreement, done at Geneva on 6 December 2005
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................11
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sprejetju protokola o spremembi sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (Sporazum TRIPS), podpisanega 6. decembra 2005 v Ženevi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council decision on the acceptance, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement, done at Geneva on 6 December 2005
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta (8934/2006),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (8934/2006),
– ob upoštevanju členov 75 in 83(7) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 75 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ter ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0403/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0403/2007 ),
Sporazum o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (TRIPS), ki je bil sprejet leta 1994, je temeljna pravna načela Svetovne trgovinske organizacije razširil na sektor intelektualne lastnine in okrepil minimalne standarde za njeno varstvo.
The TRIPS Agreement adopted in 1994 extends the basic legal principles of the World Trade Organisation to the area of intellectual property and increases minimum protection standards for intellectual property.
Znatni stroški, povezani z uvedbo višjih standardov za varstvo intelektualne lastnine v državah v razvoju, so sprožili živahne razprave, zlasti glede vprašanja, ali nemara okrepljena zaščita patentov v skladu s sporazumom TRIPS revnim državam preprečuje dostop do cenovno sprejemljivih zdravil.
The significant costs associated with the introduction of higher intellectual property protection standards in developing countries generated intense discussion, particularly as to whether increased patent protection under the rules of the TRIPS Agreement impeded access to affordable medicines in poor countries.
Razprava je dosegla vrhunec na ministrski konferenci STO v Dohi leta 2001 s sprejetjem deklaracije iz Dohe, ki poudarja, da je sporazum TRIPS mogoče in nujno razumeti in izvajati tako, da bo podpiral pravico članic STO do varstva javnega zdravja in še posebej do spodbujanja dostopa do zdravil za vse.
The WTO Ministerial Conference held in Doha in 2001 culminated in the adoption of the 'Doha Declaration', which stressed that the TRIPS Agreement could and should be interpreted and implemented in a manner supportive of WTO members' right to protect public health and, in particular, to promote access to medicines for all.
Deklaracija iz Dohe potrjuje obstoječo prilagodljivost sporazuma TRIPS, obenem pa priznava verjetnost, da se države z nezadostnimi ali neobstoječimi proizvodnimi zmogljivostmi v farmacevtskem sektorju lahko soočijo s težavami pri učinkoviti uporabi prisilnega licenciranja, ter Svetu za sporazum TRIPS naroči, naj ta problem hitro razreši.
In addition to affirming existing 'flexibilities' in the TRIPS Agreement, the declaration recognised that countries with insufficient or no manufacturing capacity in the pharmaceutical sector could face difficulties in making effective use of compulsory licensing and instructed the Council for TRIPS to find an 'expeditious solution' to this problem.
Svet za sporazum TRIPS je po dolgih in zapletenih pogajanjih dosegel soglasen sporazum, ki je bil sprejet s sklepom generalnega sveta STO 30. avgusta 2003.
After long and difficult negotiations, the Council for TRIPS reached an agreement which was adopted by a decision of the general Council of the WTO on 30 August 2003.
Ta sklep navaja okoliščine, v katerih lahko države z nezadostnimi ali neobstoječimi proizvodnimi zmogljivostmi v farmacevtskem sektorju izkoristijo prisilne licence in uvozijo generične različice zdravil, ki so še vedno zaščitena s patentom, a le v primeru, da so v državi izvoznici in v državi uvoznici izpolnjeni številni pogoji.
This decision spells out the circumstances under which countries with insufficient or no manufacturing capacity in the pharmaceutical sector can make effective use of compulsory licensing and import generic versions of drugs still under patent, subject to a large number of conditions in both the exporting and importing country.
Da bi mehanizem, vzpostavljen s sklepom, pričel delovati, ga je treba izvajati na nacionalni ravni, v primeru Evropske unije pa na regionalni ravni.
To render the mechanism established in the decision operational, implementation at national or - as in the case of the European Union - regional level was required.
Tako je Komisija v skladu s postopkom soodločanja oktobra 2004 predstavila predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prisilnem licenciranju patentov v zvezi s proizvodnjo farmacevtskih izdelkov za izvoz v države s težavami v javnem zdravju.
To that end, in October 2004 the Commission presented, under the co-decision procedure, a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compulsory licensing of patents relating to the manufacture of pharmaceutical products for export to countries with public health problems.
Predlog je vseboval še celo vrsto dodatnih bremenitev in pogojev poleg tistih, ki so že predvidene v odločitvi STO.
The proposal contained a large number of charges and conditions in addition to the substantial number already envisaged in the WTO decision.
Poročevalec Van Hecke si je prizadeval, da bi besedilo čimbolj zvesto preneslo odločitev STO, ter poskušal odpraviti vse dodatne pogoje, ki bi že tako kompleksen mehanizem še dodatno zapletli in ga naredili nejasnega in neuporabnega.
The rapporteur, Mr Van Hecke, accordingly directed his efforts to ensuring that the text transposed the WTO decision as faithfully as possible, by seeking to remove all additional conditions which would have rendered the - already extremely complex - mechanism even more complicated, confusing and, in effect, unusable.
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino je 12. julija 2005 z veliko večino in z le nekaj vzdržanimi glasovi sprejel poročilo.
On 12 July 2005 the Committee on International Trade adopted the report by a very large majority, with a couple of abstentions.
Glede na skorajšnjo ministrsko konferenco STO v Hongkongu je Van Hecke, zavedajoč se podpore vseh članov Odbora, namesto da bi si prizadeval za takojšnji sprejem poročila na plenarnem zasedanju, v tesnem sodelovanju s poročevalci v senci ostalih političnih skupin začel z neuradnim tristranskim pogovorom s Komisijo in Svetom, da bi še pred srečanjem v Hongkongu na prvem branju dosegli medinstitucionalni sporazum ter tako okrepili položaj Unije na večstranskih pogajanjih.
In the run-up to the forthcoming WTO ministerial conference in Hong Kong, strengthened by the solid report he had received from the committee, Mr Van Hecke, instead of seeking the report's immediate adoption in plenary, launched, in close cooperation with the shadow rapporteurs of the other political groups, an informal trialogue with the Commission and the Council with a view to achieving interinstitutional agreement on first reading before the Hong Kong conference and thus strengthening the European Union's position in the multilateral negotiations.
Med tristranskimi pogovori je poročevalec dosegel kompromis, pri čemer je izhajal iz predpostavke, da je uredba le začasna rešitev in da bo Parlamentom ponovno podal svoje mnenje, ko bo sprejeta dokončna sprememba, kar se je v tistem času zdelo daleč.
In the course of the trialogue, the rapporteur negotiated a compromise on the assumption that the regulation represented only a temporary solution and that the European Parliament would be consulted again when a permanent amendment was adopted, which still seemed to be a distant prospect at that time.
Naš Odbor je v poročilu posebej zahteval, da Komisija vsaka tri leta po začetku veljavnosti sporazuma predloži poročilo o njegovem izvajanju, prav z namenom spremljanja uporabe uvedenega mehanizma.
In its report, our committee had specifically asked the Commission to present, at three-year intervals after the entry into force of the regulation, a report on its operation, in order to monitor the use made of the mechanism it introduced.
Besedilo, ki ga je sprejel Odbor za mednarodno trgovino, je bilo ambicioznejše od končnega kompromisa, zlasti glede prenosa tehnologije in okrepitve zmogljivosti držav v razvoju, nadomestil za imetnike pravic, poenostavljenega in pospešenega postopka ter neodložilnega učinka pritožb.
The text adopted by the Committee on International Trade was more ambitious than the final compromise text, particularly with regard to technology transfer and capacity building in the developing countries, the remuneration of right holders, the simplified and accelerated procedure and the non-suspensory effect of appeals.
Parlament je s tem prispevkom vendar znatno izboljšal predlog Komisije.
Nevertheless, Parliament's input greatly improved the Commission's original proposal.
Parlament je Kompromis, dosežen s strani treh institucij, končno sprejel 1. decembra 2005 na prvem branju, Svet pa 27. aprila 2006, s čemer je bila začasna odpoved prenesena v pravo Skupnosti.
The compromise reached by the three institutions was eventually adopted by Parliament on first reading on 1 December 2005 and by the Council on 27 April 2006, thus transposing the temporary waiver into Community law.
Generalni svet STO je 6. decembra 2005, le nekaj dni po sprejetju uredbe v Parlamentu, sprejel sklep o trajni spremembi sporazuma TRIPS.
On 6 December 2005, a few days after Parliament had adopted the regulation, the WTO General Council adopted a decision on a permanent amendment to the TRIPS Agreement.
Glede na skorajšnjo trajno spremembo je Komisija predložila predlog sklepa Sveta o sprejetju protokola, ki spreminja sporazum TRIPS.
It was in the light of this permanent amendment that the Commission submitted the present proposal for a Council decision accepting the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement.
Evropski parlament se mora odločiti, ali bo privolil v ta predlog.
The European Parliament has to decide whether to give its assent to this proposal.
Če bo Evropska unija sprejela protokol, bo v skladu s postopkom soodločanja Parlament ponovno podal mnenje o predlogu spremembe uredbe o prenosu protokola v pravo Skupnosti.
If the protocol is accepted by the European Union, the European Parliament will be consulted again, under the codecision procedure, on the proposal to amend the regulation transposing the protocol into Community law.
Vsebina predloga
Substance of the proposal
Poročevalec meni, da gre pri tem problemu za precej več kot za privolitev v mednarodni protokol.
Your rapporteur considers that the issue at stake goes far beyond simply assenting to an international protocol.
Gre za problem, ki je zelo pomemben s političnega in humanitarnega vidika: dostop do zdravil strani najrevnejših držav, držav v razvoju in manj razvitih držav, ki niso kos visokim cenam, ki jih postavlja farmacevtska industrija.
The problem addressed is of huge political and humanitarian importance: access to medicines in the developing and less-developed countries where they are most needed, but which cannot pay the high prices set by the pharmaceutical industry.
Poročevalec bi rad glede na navedene razloge navedel nekaj misli:
This being so, your rapporteur wishes to make the following comments:
1) Protokol je bil posredovan vsem članicam STO, ki ga lahko sprejmejo do 1. decembra 2007 ali do poznejšega datuma, če tako določi Ministrska konferenca.
(1) The protocol has been submitted to all WTO members and is open for acceptance until 1 December 2007 or such later date as may be decided by the ministerial conference.
Protokol začne veljati šele, ko ga sprejmeta dve tretjini članic STO.
The protocol will enter into force upon acceptance by two-thirds of WTO members.
Sklep o odpovedi (tj. sklep iz leta 2003) ostaja pravna podlaga do sprejetja protokola.
Pending such acceptance, the waiver (the 2003 decision) will continue to be the legal basis.
Evropska unija je odpoved že prenesla v svoje notranje pravo, zato sprejetje protokola po 1. decembru ne bi povzročilo pravne praznine, ampak bi omogočilo, da se opravi ocena učinkovitosti predlaganega mehanizma ter njegove primernosti, da postane stalen.
The European Union has already transposed the waiver into law, and consequently delaying acceptance of the protocol until after 1 December would not create a legal vacuum, but could allow time to assess the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism to be assessed and whether it should be made permanent.
2) Do sedaj je stalno spremembo sporazuma TRIPS odobrilo le sedem držav (od 150 članic STO), ki predstavljajo 4,7 % vseh članic: Združene države Amerike, Švica, Salvador, Republika Koreja, Norveška, Indija in Filipini.
(2) To date, only seven countries (out of the 150 WTO members), or 4.7% of the membership, have accepted the permanent amendment of the TRIPS agreement: the United States, Switzerland, El Salvador, the Republic of Korea, Norway, India and the Philippines.
Če Evropska unija protokola ne odobri do 1. decembra 2007, ne bo edina, saj sploh ni gotovo, da je cilj dveh tretjin članic (100 držav) možno doseči°do 1. decembra 2007.
If the European Union did not accept the protocol by 1 December 2007, it would not be alone, and it is by no means certain that the objective of acceptance by two thirds of the membership (100 countries) could be achieved by that date.
3) Ne bi bilo treba, da je sprememba le kopija sklepa STO z dne 30. avgusta 2003, a je nasprotovanje nekaterih članic STO onemogočilo sprejetje spremembe, ki bi omogočila lažji dostop do zdravil.
(3) The amendment did not have to be a mere 'cut and paste' of the WTO decision of 30 August 2003, but the opposition of some WTO member states made it impossible to adopt an amendment allowing easier access to medicines.
4) Sklep STO z dne 30. avgusta 2003 naj bi bil hitra rešitev iz krize pri dostopu do zdravil, v kateri so se znašle države v razvoju z malo proizvodnih zmogljivosti, ni pa dokazov o učinkovitosti sklepa.
(4) The WTO decision of 30 August 2003 was supposed to provide an 'expeditious solution' to the crisis in access to medicines faced by developing countries with little manufacturing capacity, but there is no proof of the decision's efficacy.
Doslej so zakonodajo za prenos sklepa v svoje notranje pravo sprejele Kanada, Norveška, Kitajska, Republika Koreja, Indija in Evropska unija.
To date, only Canada, Norway, China, Korea, India and the European Union have adopted legislation transposing the decision into their own law.