natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
D. ker Witold Tomczak trdi, da je z omenjenim dejanjem poskušal zaščititi svoja religiozna čustva in religiozna čustva drugih ljudi ter zavarovati papeževo dostojanstvo; ker izpodbija višino škode, ki naj bi jo domnevno povzročil, in ker vsekakor meni, da je bil namen njegovega vedenja zaščititi višjo vrednoto – papeževo čast v očeh poljskih katolikov,
D. whereas Witold Tomczak claims that by his action towards the sculpture he sought to defend his and other people’s religious feelings, as well as to protect the dignity of the Pope; whereas he contests the amount of the damage he allegedly caused and in any case considers that his behaviour was aimed at protecting a higher value – that of the Pope’s honour in the eyes of Polish Catholics,
E. ker na osnovi pridobljenih informacij Witolda Tomczaka ne ščiti poslanska imuniteta v zvezi z nobeno od obtožb, na katere je bil opozorjen predsednik Evropskega parlamenta,
E. whereas, on the basis of the information obtained, Witold Tomczak is not protected by parliamentary immunity in respect of any of the allegations which have been drawn to the attention of the President of the European Parliament,
Witold Tomczak je bil izvoljen za poslanca poljskega parlamenta (sejma) 21. septembra 1997 izmed kandidatov na listi Akcja Wyborcza Solidarność (Akcija Solidarnosti za volitve - AWS) in 23. septembra 2001 izmed kandidatov na listi Liga Polskich Rodzin (Zveza poljskih družin – LPR).
Witold Tomczak was elected a Member of the Polish Parliament (Sejm) on 21 September 1997 from the list of Akcja Wyborcza Solidarność (Solidarity Action for Elections - AWS) and on 23 September 2001 from the list of Liga Polskich Rodzin (League of Polish Families - LPR).
Ker je bil izvoljen v Evropski parlament na volitvah, ki so bile na Poljskem 13. junija 2004, je postal poslanec EP in njegov mandat v sejmu je prenehal 16. junija 2004, ko so bili objavljeni rezultati volitev.
As he was elected to the European Parliament in elections taking place in Poland on 13 June 2004, he became an MEP and his term of office in the Sejm ended with effect on the 16 June 2004, when the election results were announced.
Decembra 2000 je bil v galeriji Zaheta v Varšavi na ogled kip Maurizia Cattelana Deveta ura, ki je v lasti galerije Emanuel Perrotion v Parizu in upodablja papeža Janeza Pavla II, ki ga zadene meteorit.
In December 2000, Maurizio Cattelan's sculpture titled “The Ninth Hour”, depicting Pope John Paul II crushed by a stone, which is owned by the Emanuel Perrotion Gallery in Paris, was on display in the Zachęta Gallery in Warsaw.
Kip je postal predmet protestov Witolda Tomczaka in ostalih, ker naj bi žalil njihova verska prepričanja in papeževo dostojanstvo.
This sculpture was the subject of protests by Mr Tomczak and others on the ground that it offended against their religious beliefs and the dignity of the Pope.
Pri časopisu Super Express so 21 decembra 2000 prejeli informacijo, da bo v galeriji Zaheta potekala protestna akcija proti omenjenemu kipu.
On 21 December 2000, the newspaper “Super Express” received information that a protest action was to take place in the Zachęta Gallery against that sculpture.
V galerijo sta prišla dva novinarja, ki sta bila priča prihodu Witolda Tomczaka in poslanke sejma Haline Nowina-Konopke.
Two journalists came to the Gallery, where they witnessed the arrival of Mr Tomczak and another Member of Sejm, Halina Nowina-Konopka.
Medtem ko je poslanka zasedla sedež v neposredni bližini kipa, ki je bil rezerviran za osebje galerije, je Tomczak prestopil črto, ki je omejevala dostop do skulpture, ter pritisnil na njen del, ki predstavlja meteorit, ter s tem povzročil njegov padec.
While Ms Nowina-Konopka took a seat reserved for the Gallery’s personnel close to the sculpture, Mr Tomczak crossed the line limiting access to the sculpture and by pushing against part of it (depicting the stone) caused it to fall.
Posledica tega so bile poškodbe na nekaterih delih skulpture.
This resulted a number of component parts of the sculpture being damaged.
Zaradi povzročene škode je bilo treba kip v Parizu popraviti, kar je dne 20 marca 2001, ko je zavarovalna družba Gerling Polska, pri kateri je bil kip zavarovan, izplačala škodni zahtevek, znašalo 70 000 francoskih frankov oziroma 39 669 poljskih zlotov.
Owing to the damage it sustained, the sculpture had to be repaired in Paris at an estimated cost of 70 000 French francs, which worked out at 39 669 Polish złoty on 20 March 2001, that is to say on the day when the insurance company that insured the sculpture (Gerling Polska) paid out on the claim.
Kasneje je zavarovalnica v skladu s členom 288(4) poljskega kazenskega zakonika
Subsequently, Gerling Polska filed a request with the District Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw for criminal proceedings to be brought against Mr Tomczak in accordance with Article 288(4) of the Polish Penal Code
Ta člen se glasi: Pregon kaznivih dejanj, navedenih v odstavkih 1 in 2 se sproži na zahtevo oškodovane stranke (poljski izvirnik: Ściganie przestępstwa określonego w § 1 lub 2 następuje na wniosek pokrzywdzonego). vložila zahtevo na okrožnemu tožilstvu v Varšavi za kazenski postopek proti Witoldu Tomczaku.
This article reads: Prosecution of the crimes described in paragraphs 1 and 2 starts on the basis of the injured party’s request (Polish original: Ściganie przestępstwa określonego w § 1 lub 2 następuje na wniosek pokrzywdzonego ). .
V zaključku okrožni tožilec v Varšavi zahteva, naj se Witoldu Tomczaku ne prizna poslanska imuniteta, da ga bo lahko seznanil z obtožnico v zgoraj omenjenem postopku in ga zaslišal kot osumljenca.
In conclusion, the District Prosecutor in Warsaw asks that the parliamentary immunity of Mr Tomczak be waived in order that he may present him with the charges in the above-mentioned proceedings and question him as a suspect.
Ustrezni določbi Poslovnika sta člena 6 in 7, zlasti odstavka (1) in (2) člena 6:
The relevant provisions of the Rules of Procedure are Rules 6 and 7, in particular Rule 6(1) and (2):
Vsaka zahteva za odvzem imunitete poslancu, ki jo na predsednika naslovi pristojni organ države članice, se razglasi v Parlamentu in posreduje pristojnemu odboru. '
Any request addressed to the President by a competent authority of a Member State that the immunity of a Member be waived shall be announced in Parliament and referred to the committee responsible. '
Ker je predsednik Parlamenta menil, da je okrožni državni tožilec v Varšavi začel postopek za odvzem imunitete Witoldu Tomczaku, je bila v skladu z zgoraj omenjenim Poslovnikom zahteva razglašena v Parlamentu.
As the President of Parliament considered that the District Prosecutor in Warsaw had opened the procedure for waiving the immunity of Witold Tomczak, as laid down in the above-mentioned Rules, the request was announced in Parliament.
Razsodba v zadevi o odgovornosti uradnih predstavnikov Skupnosti glede davkov na premoženje je jasno opredelila, da kršitev določil PPI predstavlja kršitev obveznosti iz pogodb (sodba z dne 24. februarja 1988 v zadevi 260/86 Komisija proti Belgiji [1988] ECR 966).
A judgment in a case concerning liability of Community officials to property tax makes it clear that a breach of the provisions of the PPI constitutes a breach of the obligations arising out of the Treaties (judgment of 24 February 1988 in Case 260/86 Commission v. Belgium [1988] ECR 966).
Da bi lahko ocenili možne kršitve PPI, je koristno, da se spomnimo naslednjih pomembnih dejstev:
In order to assess whether the PPI has been breached, it is useful to call to mind the following pertinent facts :
b) Witold Tomczak je trenutno poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, dogodek, ki je osnova za kazenski postopek zoper njega, pa se je zgodil na Poljskem ali v njegovi matični državi.
b) Mr Tomczak is at present a Member of European Parliament, and the event constituting the basis for the legal proceedings against him took place in Poland, that is in his home State.
Smiselno je preučiti, kako se zgoraj navedena dejstva in navedbe skladajo s privilegiji in imunitetami iz poglavja III, členov 9–10 a) PPI:
It is appropriate to consider how the above-mentioned facts and allegations square with the privileges and immunities granted by Chapter III, Articles 9 to10 a) of the PPI:
1) Člen 9 podeljuje poslancem nedotakljivost glede mnenj ali glasov, izrečenih pri opravljanju njihovih dolžnosti.
1) Article 9 grants inviolability to Members in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties.
Ta zaščita sega onkraj trajanja mandata, vendar vedno v obsegu, ki ga omejuje natančna opredelitev v tem členu.
This protection extends beyond the duration of the mandate but its scope is restricted by the clear language of the article.
Witold Tomczak decembra 2000 ni bil poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, zato se člen 9 v tem primeru ne uporabi.
Mr Tomczak was not a Member of the European Parliament in December 2000 and Article 9 is therefore not applicable.
Obseg poslanske imunitete na Poljskem je zelo podoben tistemu iz PPI.
The scope of the parliamentary immunity in Poland is very similar to that of the immunity provided for in the PPI.
Glede teh dejavnosti lahko poslanec odgovarja le pred sejmom, v primeru pa, da je kršil pravice tretjih oseb, se lahko proti njemu uvede sodni postopek le s privolitvijo sejma.
Regarding such activities, a Deputy can only be held liable before the Sejm and, in a case where he has infringed the rights of third parties, he may only be proceeded against before a court with the consent of the Sejm.
Od dneva razglasitve izida volitev do dneva izteka njegovega mandata poslanec ne more biti kazensko odgovoren brez privolitve sejma.
From the day of announcement of the results of the elections until the day of the expiry of his mandate, a Deputy shall not be subjected to criminal liability without the consent of the Sejm.
Kazenski postopek, ki je bil začet proti osebi pred datumom njene izvolitve za poslanca, se na zahtevo sejma začasno prekine do izteka mandata.
Criminal proceedings instituted against a person before the day of his election as Deputy, shall be suspended at the request of the Sejm until the time of expiry of the mandate.
Poslancu se ne sme vzeti prostosti ali ga aretirati brez privolitve sejma, razen v primeru dokazanega kaznivega dejanja (in flagrante delicto), ko je odvzem prostosti nujen za zagotovitev ustreznega poteka postopka.
A Deputy shall be neither detained nor arrested without the consent of the Sejm, except for cases in flagrante delicto and in which his detention is necessary for securing the proper course of proceedings.
O vsakem takem odvzemu prostosti je treba takoj obvestiti predsednika sejma, ki lahko odredi takojšnjo izpustitev poslanca.
Any such detention shall be immediately communicated to the Marshal of the Sejm, who may order an immediate release of the Deputy.
Glede na navedeno je treba zahtevo okrožnega tožilca v Varšavi obravnavati kot zahtevo za odločitev evropskega parlamenta o nepriznanju imunitete Witoldu Tomczaku, da bo slednji lahko kazensko odgovarjal, kot dopušča člen 105(2) poljske ustave.
In view of the above, the Warsaw District Prosecutor’s request should be treated as a request for a decision of the European Parliament to waive the immunity of Mr Tomczak so that he can be subjected to criminal liability, as is possible under Art. 105(2) of the Polish Constitution.
Evropski parlament ima torej pravico, da Witoldu Tomczaku ne prizna ali prizna imuniteto.
The European Parliament has thus the right to waive or not to waive the immunity of Mr Tomczak.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso bi se Evropski parlament lahko odločil, da prizna imuniteto enega svojih poslancev, če bi obstajal sum, da je namen pregona oškodovanje poslančevega političnega delovanja ( fumus persecutionis ).
Following its established practice, the European Parliament could decide not to waive the immunity of one of its Members if a suspicion existed that the prosecution was based on an intention to prejudice the Member's political activities ( fumus persecutionis) .
V primeru poslanca Tomczaka ni očitnih dokazov za to.
There is no clear evidence to that effect in this case.
Temeljno dejstvo, da je poslanec Tomczak povzročil škodo na kipu z naslovom Deveta ura, ki upodablja papeža Janeza Pavla II, ki ga zadene meteorit, se ne izpodbija.
The basic fact that Mr Tomczak caused damage to the sculpture titled “The Ninth Hour”, depicting Pope John Paul II crushed by a stone, is not contested.
Ne glede na razloge poslanca Tomczaka je škoda, povzročena tuji lastnini, kaznivo dejanje, ki se ga preganja z obtožnico, in oškodovana stranka v zadevi, zavarovalniška družba Gerling Polska, je zahtevala sodni pregon v skladu s poljsko zakonodajo.
Notwithstanding Mr Tomczak's motives, damage caused to another person’s property is a crime prosecuted by indictment and the party injured in this case, the insurance company Gerling Polska, has requested the prosecution in accordance with Polish law.
Višino škode, ki jo je povzročil poslanec Tomczak, ter druga postopkovna in vsebinska vprašanja v zvezi z zadevo bi morali objektivno rešiti poljski sodni organi ob upoštevanju zadevnih okoliščin.
The value of the damage caused by Mr Tomczak, as well as the other procedural and substantive questions raised in this case, should be resolved objectively by the Polish judiciary authorities, taking into account all the relevant circumstances.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov in v skladu s členom 6(2) Poslovnika ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti zaščiti poslančeve imunitete, Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament Witoldu Tomczaku ne prizna poslanske imunitete.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after considering the reasons for and against waiving the Member's immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should waive the parliamentary immunity of Witold Tomczak.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o sklenitvi protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega prispevka v skladu s sporazumom o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo za obdobje od 1. avgusta 2008 do 31. julija 2012
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for the period 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2012
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................14
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................14
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................18
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................18
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Sveta ( KOM(2008)0243 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation ( COM(2008)0243 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 37 in 300 (2) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Articles 37 and 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6­0199/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0199/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo in mnenj Odbora za razvoj in Odbora za proračun ( A6-0278/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0278/2008 ),
(2a) Začetek veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe bo uvedel tesnejše medinstitucionalno sodelovanje, ki bi moralo Evropskemu parlamentu omogočiti dostop do vseh informacij v zvezi s sporazumi o ribištvu, tudi med obdobji pogajanj za protokole.
(2a) The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon will impose closer interinstitutional cooperation which, among other aspects, should lead to the European Parliament having greater and better access to all information relating to fisheries agreements, including during the negotiations on protocols.
En član Odbora za ribištvo Evropskega parlamenta je kot opazovalec prisoten na sejah in pri delu skupnega odbora iz člena 10 sporazuma.
A member of the European Parliament's Committee on Fisheries shall attend the meetings and proceedings of the joint committee provided for in Article 10 of the Agreement as an observer.
Teh sej se lahko udeležujejo tudi predstavniki ribiškega sektorja, kot predvideva sporazum.
Representatives of the fisheries sector fishing within the framework of the Agreement may also attend these meetings.
Evropski parlament je že večkrat zahteval, da bi bili člani Odbora za ribištvo prisotni v skupnih odborih.
Parliament has traditionally called for members of the Committee on Fisheries to attend the joint committees.
Poleg tega je treba upoštevati možno sprejetje lizbonske pogodbe, za katerega mora Evropski parlament dati svojo privolitev, in v postopek vključiti možnost pridobitve čim večjega števila kakovostnejših informacij od začetka veljavnosti protokola.
With a view to the possible approval of the Treaty of Lisbon, under which Parliament will have to give its assent, reference should also be made to the possibility of obtaining more and better information as soon as the new protocol enters into force.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu posreduje sklepe sej skupnega odbora iz člena 10 sporazuma.
The Commission shall forward the conclusions of the meetings of the joint committee provided for in Article 10 of the Agreement to the European Parliament.
V zadnjem letu veljavnosti protokola in pred sklenitvijo novega sporazuma o njegovi obnovitvi Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi poročilo o izvajanju sporazuma.
During the final year of the Protocol's validity and before another agreement is concluded on its renewal, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on its application.
V skladu s členom 30(3) finančne uredbe 1 in v duhu resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. februarja 2008 o preglednosti na finančnem področju 2 Komisija vsako leto na svoji spletni strani objavi seznam različnih končnih upravičencev do finančnega prispevka Unije.
In accordance with Article 30(3) of the Financial Regulation 1 , and in the spirit of the European Parliament's resolution of 19 February 2008 on transparency in financial matters 2 , the Commission shall publish annually on its website the list of individual end-beneficiaries of the EU financial contribution.
1 Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.1) .
1 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.
Predlog spremembe predvideva natančnejše zahteve glede informacij o končnih upravičencih do finančnega nadomestila EU.
This amendment includes more specific requirements for detailed reporting on end-beneficiaries of the financial compensation paid by the EU.
Protokol o ribolovu, ki ga določa ta sporazum, velja od 1. avgusta 2006 do 31. julija 2008
The fisheries protocol contained in that agreement applies from 1 August 2006 to 31 July 2008
Komisija je 14. decembra 2007 predlagala Svetu, naj odstopi od protokola
On 14 December 2007 the Commission proposed to the Council that the protocol be terminated
KOM(2007)0782 , ker ribolovne možnosti, zlasti tiste iz kategorije 9 za ribolov majhnih pelagičnih vrst, niso bile popolnoma izkoriščene.
COM(2007) 782. , since the fishing opportunities were not being fully used, particularly those relating to category 9 for small pelagic species.
Ministri za ribištvo so februarja 2008 zavrnili predlog o odstopu od protokola in dali prednost ponovnim pogajanjem o njem.
In February 2008 the EU fisheries ministers rejected the option of repealing the protocol, preferring to re-negotiate it.
V kategoriji 9 so se ribolovne možnosti zmanjšale s 440 000 ton na 250 000 ton na leto, medtem ko je zmanjšanje v kategoriji glavonožcev 55-odstotno ob upoštevanju dveh preteklih let in zmanjšanja, ki velja že od maja 2006.
In the latter case, fishing opportunities are dropping from 440 000 tonnes/year to 250 000 tonnes/year, whilst the cephalopod category will see a cut of 55% if the two previous years are taken into account and the reduction already applied in May 2006 is also included.
Finančni prispevek iz člena 2 protokola znaša 86 milijonov EUR za prvo leto, kot je bilo določeno že v predhodnem protokolu, 76 milijonov EUR za drugo leto, 73 milijonov EUR za tretje leto ter 70 milijonov EUR za zadnje leto.
The financial contribution provided for in Article 2 of the protocol has been set at EUR 86 million for the first year, the same as under the previous protocol, EUR 76 million in the second year, EUR 73 million in the third year and EUR 70 million in the last year.
Od teh zneskov se bo za sodelovanje pri razvoju mavretanskega ribiškega sektorja namenilo 11 milijonov EUR za prvo leto, za vsako naslednje leto pa po 16 milijonov EUR, 18 milijonov EUR in 20 milijonov EUR.
Of these amounts, EUR 11 million will be allocated to development cooperation for the Mauritanian fisheries sector in the first year, and EUR 16 million, EUR 18 million and EUR 20 million in each of the following years.
Obrazložitev v predlogu Komisije, ki je sicer ni v protokolu, navaja, da bi se lahko razlika v znesku, ki bi ga Mavretanija prejela v štirih prihodnjih letih, če bi se ohranilo finančno nadomestilo, predvideno z veljavnim protokolom, poravnala s prispevkom Evropskega sklada za razvoj v višini 40 milijonov EUR, razdeljenih med tri leta po letu 2009, če bodo pogoji primerni za to.
Even though it is not included in the articles of the protocol, an explanatory note in the text of the Commission proposal indicates that the difference by comparison with the sum that Mauritania would have received if the same financial compensation as in the current protocol had been maintained over the coming five years may, if conditions allow, be offset with a contribution from the European Development Fund (EDF) of EUR 40 million over the three years from 2009.
Poleg tega se ocenjuje, da bo prispevek lastnikov plovil znašal 15 milijonov EUR na leto, skupno torej 60 milijonov EUR v obdobju veljavnosti novega protokola.
It is calculated that shipowners' contribution in the form of licences will stand at EUR 15 million per year, i.e. EUR 60 million during the period covered by the new protocol.
Prav tako je v primeru presežka letne kvote 250 000 ton, določene za kategorijo 9 za ribolov majhnih pelagičnih vrst, predviden dodatni prispevek v višini 40 EUR na tono ulova namesto prispevka 15 EUR iz sedanjega protokola.
Furthermore, if the 250 000 tonnes/year fixed for category 9 (small pelagics) is exceeded, provision is made for an additional contribution of EUR 40 per tonne fished by comparison with EUR 15 per tonne under the current protocol.
Naslednja preglednica primerja glavne elemente iz sedaj veljavnega protokola in protokola, ki bo začel veljati 1. avgusta 2008:
The following table provides a comparison between the main features of the current protocol and the protocol that is to enter into force on 1 August 2008.
Povprečna poraba ribolovnih možnosti v obdobju 2006–2008
Average use of fishing opportunities 2006/2008
Kategorija 1 Plovila za ribolov rakov, razen rarogov in rakovic
Category 1: Vessels fishing for crustaceans other than spiny lobster and crab
9 440/ 9 570 BT
9 440/ 9 570 GT
7 183/ 7 313 BT
7 183/ 7 313 GT
1 371/ 1 371 BT
1 .371/ 1 371 GT
886/ 886 BT
886/ 886 GT
Kategorija 2 Plovila z vlečno mrežo in plovila s pridnenimi parangali za ribolov senegalskega osliča
Category 2: Black hake trawlers and bottom longliners
3 600/ 3 240 BT
3 600/ 3 240 GT
2 324/ 1 162 BT
2 324 /1 162 GT
1 500/ 1 162 BT
1 500/ 1 162 GT
800/ 0 BT
800/ 0 GT
24/ 0 BT
24/ 0 GT
Kategorija 4 Zamrzovalna plovila z vlečno mrežo za ribolov pridnenih vrst
Category 4: Freezer trawlers fishing for demersal species