natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To je mogoče ponazoriti s podatkom, da je v prvih šestih letih obstoja Solidarnostnega sklada EU Komisija prejela 62 vlog za denarno pomoč iz 21 različnih držav
To put this into perspective, records show that during the first six years of the EU Solidarity Fund, the Commission received 62 requests for financial support from 21 different countries
KOM(2009) 193 konč. .
COM(2009) 193 final. .
Približno tretjina teh vlog zadeva nesreče iz kategorije „večjih nesreč“.
Of these, roughly a third fall into the category of ‘major disasters’.
Ob drugih nesrečah prošnje za črpanje 1sredstev iz sklada niso bile vložene, pa čeprav so imele hude in v številnih primerih tudi dolgotrajne posledice za prizadeto prebivalstvo, okolje in gospodarstvo.
Other disasters did not prompt requests for use of the Fund, although their impact on the populations affected, the environment and the economy was considerable and, in many cases, lasting.
Škodo je pogosto težko ovrednotiti, predvsem zaradi izgube človeških življenj.
The damage is almost always hard to gauge, in particular taking into account the loss of human life.
V vsakem primeru pa imajo nesreče visoko ekonomsko in družbeno ceno.
In any event, the economic and social costs of disasters are very significant.
V tem okviru mora preprečevanje pridobiti večji družbeni pomen in postati vse pomembnejša faza v ciklusu upravljanja nesreč.
It is against this backdrop that prevention should increase in social importance, becoming an increasingly important stage in disaster management.
Ker je jasno, da so države članice prve in glavne odgovorne za zaščito svojih državljanov in preprečevanje nesreč, so krepitev sodelovanja na področju preprečevanja, boljša koordinacija prizadevanj ter krepitev solidarnosti in medsebojne pomoči popolnoma upravičeni.
Although Member States are primarily and chiefly responsible for the protection of their citizens and for disaster prevention, heightened cooperation in the area of prevention is fully justified, as are improved coordination of efforts, enhanced solidarity and mutual assistance.
Da bi ta cilj lahko uresničili, predlagamo sodelovanje med nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, pristojnimi za ravnanje v primeru nesreč, za urejanje prostora ter kartiranje in ukrepanje v primeru nevarnosti.
With a view to achieving this aspiration, cooperation between national, regional and local authorities with responsibilities for disaster management, spatial planning and risk mapping and management is proposed.
Zaželena je tudi vzpostavitev mreže, ki bi delovala kot forum za izmenjavo izkušenj in preventivnih ukrepov, pri čemer bi na določen način sodelovale tudi družbene organizacije, ki delujejo na tem področju.
The creation of a network that would constitute a forum for exchanging experiences and prevention measures, which would also allow social organisations working in this area to participate in some shape or form, seems desirable.
Pri tem se poudarja vloga regionalnih in lokalnih organov, ki natančno poznajo lokalne značilnosti in razmere.
The importance of the role of regional and local authorities, owing to their detailed knowledge of local characteristics and conditions, should be highlighted.
Zaradi dejavnikov, kot so intenzivno izkoriščanje tal, neurejeno širjenje industrije in mestnega okolja, zapuščanje podeželja, dezertifikacija, vse večja pogostost ekstremnih podnebnih pojavov in drugi, postajajo države članice ranljivejše tako za naravne nesreče kot za nesreče, ki jih povzroči človek.
Factors such as, inter alia, intensive land use, haphazard industrial and urban growth, abandonment of the countryside, desertification, increasingly frequent extreme weather events make Member States, and convergence regions in particular, more vulnerable to disasters, both natural and man-made.
Ta splošna ranljivost pride še bolj do izraza v konvergenčnih regijah.
Such vulnerability is widespread but is even more acute for convergence regions.
Zato je pomembno, da se za preprečevanje uporabi prečni pristop ter da se ga vključi v ustrezne sektorske politike za spodbujanje uravnotežene rabe prostora in kohezivnega gospodarskega in družbenega razvoja v ravnovesju z naravo.
Hence the importance of viewing prevention from a cross-cutting perspective, incorporating it in the relevant sectoral policies to promote balanced land occupation and cohesive economic and social development that is in tune with nature.
Treba se je tudi zavedati, da nesreče ponavadi prizadenejo tiste, ki imajo manj sredstev, da bi zaščitili sebe, svoje bližnje in svoje premoženje.
It is also important to bear in mind that disasters tend to affect most those who have the fewest resources to protect themselves, their families and their assets.
Menimo, da bi bilo koristno in potrebno na ravni EU ustvariti primeren finančni okvir za preprečevanje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek.
The creation of a suitable financial framework at EU level for the prevention of natural and man-made disasters is thus considered relevant and necessary.
Tako bi okrepili in uskladili že obstoječe instrumente na različnih področjih, tudi na področju kohezijske politike, regionalne politike, politike razvoja podeželja in drugih.
This would back up and link existing instruments, including those in the cohesion policy, regional policy and rural development policy areas, among others.
Financiranje s strani EU bi namenili celi vrsti preventivnih ukrepov, ki jih bodo države članice uresničevale za splošno odpravljanje situacij, v katerih bi lahko prišlo do nevarnosti, za zaščito naseljenih območij, za nadzorovanje varnosti velikih infrastruktur in za pripravo ali revizijo predpisov o varni gradnji in uporabi tal.
EU funding should favour a series of prevention measures to be implemented by Member States that are generally aimed at correcting situations potentially conducive to risks, protecting inhabited areas, monitoring the safety of major infrastructures and drafting and reviewing building safety and land use legislation.
Poleg tega je treba preprečevanje nesreč bolje vključiti v nacionalno operativno načrtovanje financiranja EU, Komisija pa mora podpreti potrebo po prenovi operativnih programov, ki so jih države članice pripravile na tem področju.
Moreover, improving the inclusion of disaster prevention in national operational programming of EU funding is considered necessary, and the Commission should support the need to reformulate the operational programmes identified by Member States in this area.
Pri tem bo treba prepoznati in na pravilen način upoštevati značilnosti in naravne omejitve redko naseljenih območij in najbolj oddaljenih regij.
The characteristics and natural constraints of sparsely populated regions and outermost regions should be acknowledged and taken into due account.
Bistvenega pomena je, da države članice razvijajo svoje zmogljivosti za raziskave in razvoj na področju preprečevanja in ukrepanja ob nesrečah.
It is vitally important for Member States to enhance their research and development (R&D) capacity in the area of disaster prevention and management.
Hkrati je to področje, na katerem je možno in zaželeno poglobiti usklajevanje in sodelovanje med državami članicami, še zlasti tistimi, ki se soočajo s podobnimi tveganji.
This is also an area where it is both possible and desirable to step up coordination and cooperation between Member States, especially those facing similar risks.
Priporočamo, da se ta potreba primerno upošteva in da se za to predvidijo potrebni viri financiranja.
It is recommended that due account be taken of this need and for it to be adequately funded.
Pomembno je tudi krepiti sisteme zgodnjega obveščanja v državah članicah ter obstoječe povezave med različnimi sistemi zgodnjega obveščanja na eni strani, na drugi strani pa tako v mestnem kot v podeželskem okolju proučevati in razvijati ukrepe za prilagajanje na vse večjo pogostost ekstremnih podnebnih pojavov.
Also in the same area, strengthening early warning systems in Member States and forging and consolidating links between the various early warning systems is seen as fundamental, as is studying and developing adaptation measures at urban and rural level, given the increased frequency of extreme weather events.
Skupnostni pristop za preprečevanje nesreč se mora predvsem osredotočati na zmanjševanje razlik med posameznimi regijami in državami članicami na tem področju, še zlasti tako, da pripomore k boljšemu preprečevanju nesreč v zelo izpostavljenih in gospodarsko šibkejših regijah in državah članicah.
A Community approach on disaster prevention should make reducing the disparities between regions and Member States in this area a central focus, in particular by helping to improve prevention in regions and Member States that are highly vulnerable to risk and have fewer economic means.
o sporočilu Komisije: Skupnostni pristop k preprečevanju naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek
on the Commission communication: A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters
Pripravljavec mnenja: Viktor Uspaskich
Rapporteur: Viktor Uspaskich
3. poudarja, da naravne nesreče najmočneje prizadenejo regije in lokalne skupnosti, ki običajno nimajo niti zadostnih materialnih in človeških virov niti zadostnega znanja in finančnih sredstev, da bi se lahko spoprijela s temi nesrečami v okviru zgolj nacionalnega in/ali regionalnega pristopa, ter da te nesreče zahtevajo učinkovit in solidaren odziv na evropski ravni;
Stresses that it is the regions and local communities that bear the brunt of natural disasters and that, generally speaking, neither their material and human resources nor their know‑how or financial resources are sufficient to cope with these disasters under a purely national and/or regional approach, and that these disasters call for an effective European‑level solidarity‑based response;
6. poudarja, da so ukrepi za ozaveščanje in informiranje javnosti bistvenega pomena za reševanje življenj, tako v smislu preprečevanja nesreč kot tudi v smislu odzivanja javnosti v času krize in po njej; zato poziva Komisijo, naj nadalje razvije vrednotenje mehanizma civilne zaščite in usposabljanje v okviru programa civilne zaščite ter pripravi smernice Skupnosti za različne možne nesreče; prav tako izpostavlja potrebo po dodatnem informiranju o evropski enotni telefonski številki za klic v sili „112“;
Emphasises the importance of public awareness-raising and information measures both in terms of disaster prevention and the public’s response during and after the crisis as essential for life-saving purposes; calls, therefore, on the Commission to develop the evaluation of the Civil Protection Mechanism and training within the framework of the Civil Protection Programme and prepare Community guidelines for the various possible calamities; stresses also the need for further information relating to the European single emergency telephone line ‘112’;
9. izpostavlja, da je kohezijska politika bistveno orodje za preprečevanje tveganja naravnih nesreč; meni, da je treba različnim skladom in instrumentom omogočiti prilagodljivo in usklajeno delovanje, da se lahko izboljša delovanje in učinkovitost te politike; poudarja, da mora biti preprečevanje tveganja usklajeno z drugimi načeli, ki se upoštevajo na področju preprečevanja, da ne pride do drobljenja ukrepov in da se poveča njihova učinkovitost ter dodana vrednost;
Points out that cohesion policy is an essential tool in natural disaster risk prevention; considers that it must be possible for the various funds and instruments to operate flexibly and in a coordinated manner in order to improve the functioning and effectiveness of that policy; stresses that risk prevention must also dovetail with other policies pursued in the field of prevention, in order to prevent the fragmentation of measures and increase their effectiveness and added value;
13. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da trenutni proračunski pritiski zaradi krize ne bodo privedli do zmanjšanja sredstev, ki so dodeljena obstoječim politikam za preprečevanje nesreč, in naj v sklopu tekočega pregleda proračuna natančno oceni morebitne vrzeli na področju preprečevanja ter preuči, ali instrumenti, ki so na voljo, pokrivajo vse vrste nesreč;
Urges the Commission to ensure that the current budgetary pressures arising from the crisis do not lead to a reduction in the resources allocated to existing disaster prevention policies and, as part of the current budget review, to carefully assess any gaps in the field of prevention and ascertain whether each type of disaster is covered by the instruments available;
16. meni, da se lahko v naslednjem programskem obdobju infrastruktura financira iz strukturnih skladov samo pod pogojem, da bodo predhodno izvedeni posebni ukrepi v skladu s standardi preprečevanja nesreč;
Takes the view that the funding of infrastructure under the Structural Funds in the next programming periods must be bound to prior implementation of specific measures in keeping with disaster prevention standards;
François Alfonsi, Charalampos Angourakis, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Mihailis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Viktor Uspaskich, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
François Alfonsi, Charalampos Angourakis, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Michail Tremopoulos, Viktor Uspaskich, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller
Poročevalec: Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
Rapporteur: Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
KOM(2009)0082 . ; podpira stališče, da je preprečevanje nesreč neločljivo povezano intervencijami; ponovno opozarja na prejšnje delo Parlamenta
COM(2009)0082 . ; supports the view that disaster prevention is inseparable from intervention; reaffirms Parliament's previous work
Poročilo z dne 18. maja 2006 o naravnih nesrečah (gozdnih požarih, sušah in poplavah) – kmetijski vidiki (C 297 E, 7.12.2006, str.
Report of 18 May 2006 on natural disasters (forest fires, drought and floods) – agricultural aspects (C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
363); resolucija z dne 16. februarja 2006 o obvladovanju tveganj in kriznem upravljanju v kmetijstvu (C 290 E, 29.11.2006, str.
363); resolution of 16 February 2006 on risk and crisis management in the agricultural sector (C 290 E, 29.11.2006, p.
407); resolucija z dne 19. junija 2008 o krepitvi zmogljivosti odzivanja Unije na nesreče (C 286 E, 14.8.2008, str.
407); resolution of 19 June 2008 on stepping up the Union’s disaster response capacity (C 286 E, 14.8.2008, p.
15) na to temo in obžaluje, da Komisija še ni pripravila zakonodajnih predlogov v skladu s njegovimi predlogi; poudarja, da je treba vzpostaviti obsežno zakonodajo in smernice z minimalnimi standardi, ki bodo odražali celosten pristop k učinkovitejši politiki EU o kriznem upravljanju; poudarja, da sicer Lizbonska pogodba dopušča okrepljeno sodelovanje med državami članicami in da se zato lahko tem okviru obravnava tudi to področje;
15). on this subject and regrets that the Commission has not yet put forward legislative proposals in line with Parliament’s proposals; stresses the need to establish comprehensive legislation and guidelines with minimum standards, reflecting a holistic approach, towards a more effective EU policy on disaster management; recalls that, in the absence of this, the Treaty of Lisbon permits the use of enhanced cooperation between Member States, and that this subject may therefore also be addressed within that framework;
3. se zavzema za enotno strategijo na ravni EU z uvedbo enotnega akcijskega načrta za posamezne vrste nesreč, ki bi zagotovila popolno solidarnost med državami pri soočanju z nesrečami; poziva, da je v tej strategiji treba posvetiti posebno pozornost izoliranim in redko naseljenim regijam, gorskim in mejnim regijam ter gospodarsko najmanj razvitim regijam Evrope;
Advocates a single EU-wide strategy through the introduction of a uniform action plan for each type of disaster, ensuring complete solidarity between countries in tackling disasters; urges that particular attention be paid within the strategy to the most isolated, most sparsely populated, mountainous and border regions of Europe, and the most economically disadvantaged European regions;
7. spodbuja sodelovanje držav članic, držav, ki mejijo na EU ter držav v razvoju pri čezmejnih projektih, v kateri se izmenjujejo najboljše prakse in širi praktično znanje prek programov sosedske in razvojne politike EU;
Urges cooperation between Member States, countries neighbouring the EU and developing countries in cross-border projects sharing best practice and disseminating practical knowledge through the EU’s neighbourhood policy programmes and development programmes;
15. poudarja vlogo, ki jo igrajo kmetje kot skrbniki podeželja v Evropski uniji; zato meni, da je treba spodbujati ohranjanje kmetijske dejavnosti na izvedljiv način, z namenom zajezitve pojavov opuščanja proizvodnje in praznjenja podeželskih območij, ki še povečujeta tveganje gozdnih požarov in širjenja puščav;
Highlights the role played by farmers as custodians of the countryside in the European Union; therefore considers it necessary to promote the maintenance of agricultural activities in a viable manner in order to curb the abandonment of production and the depopulation of rural areas, a phenomenon which further increases the risk of forest fires;
17. opozarja, da rastline s fotosintezo srkajo CO 2 iz ozračja in proizvajajo biomaso, ki se lahko predela v bioplin, biogoriva in industrijske proizvode; da porast uporabe kmetijskih proizvodov v proizvodnji industrijskih proizvodov, kot so polimeri, mazila, površinski agenti, topila in vlakna lahko pripomore k zmanjšanju odvisnosti od neobnovljivih virov energije;
Recalls that plants absorb CO2 from the atmosphere through photosynthesis and produce biomass that can be converted into biogas, biofuels and industrial goods; that the increase in the use of agricultural products in the production of industrial products such as polymers, lubricants, surface agents, solvents and fibres, can also help reduce dependence on non-renewable energy sources;
22. opozarja, da so gozdovi primarno pomembni za proizvajanje lesa, pa tudi za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, preprečevanje požarov, poplav, plazov in erozije, gospodarjenje s podtalnico, upravljanje krajine in zajemanje ogljika; nujno je treba oblikovati politiko EU za gozdove, ki bo ustrezno upoštevala raznolikost evropskih gozdov in ki bo temeljila na znanstvenih dognanjih za ohranitev, zaščito in prilagoditev gozdov boju proti nevarnostim, ki prežijo nanje;
Recalls that forests are important primarily for the production of wood, but also for maintaining biodiversity, the prevention of fires, floods, avalanches and erosion, management of groundwater resources, landscape management and carbon capture; there is a pressing need for a stringent EU forestry policy, that takes due account of the diversity of European forests and is based on scientific knowledge in order to maintain, protect and adapt forests in the fight against the risks they face; recalls that forests are important primarily for the production of wood but also for maintaining biodiversity, the prevention of fires, floods, avalanches and erosion, management of groundwater resources, landscape management and carbon capture;
26. se zavzema za oblikovanje dejanske gozdne politike za izboljšanje upravljanja in ohranjanja gozdov ob upoštevanju temeljne vloge, ki jo lahko igrajo v boju proti podnebnim spremembam, ki imajo vse večji vpliv pri naravnih nesrečah;
Advocates the creation of a genuine forest policy designed to improve the management and conservation of forests, taking into account the fundamental role that they play in combating climate change, which is having an increasing impact in natural disasters;
31. meni, da je treba nujno pripraviti shemo za minimalna vračila za naravne nesreče in nesreče, ki jih povzroči človek, ki bo dostopna vsem evropskim kmetom, ki bodo dokazali, da zanje ne velja člen 11(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006
Considers it urgent for a minimum compensation scheme for natural or man-made disasters to also be accessible to all European farmers, denouncing the unworkable nature of Article 11(8) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006
UL L 358, 16.12.2006, str.
OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p.
3. zaradi različnih zavarovalnih shem po državah članicah ter priporoča, naj se pri izračunu zavarovalnih premij za kmete da prednost spodbujanju preprečevalnih ukrepov;
3. , given the different insurance schemes available in the various Member States, recommending in addition that the component on promoting prevention measures be given preference when calculating agricultural insurance premiums;
36. poudarja potrebo po krepitvi preprečevalnih ukrepov proti naravnim nesrečam vseh vrst z izdelavo skupne zasnove za boljše usklajevanje držav članic ter za večjo učinkovitost in usklajenost različnih instrumentov Skupnosti (strukturni skladi, solidarnostni skladi, mehanizmi za hitro ukrepanje in instrumenti za preventivo proti nesrečam);
Stresses the need to enhance prevention measures designed to tackle all types of natural disaster by establishing joint strategic guidelines to ensure better coordination among the Member States, as well as greater operability and coordination among the various Community instruments (Structural Funds, Solidarity Fund, and the rapid response mechanism and preparedness instrument for major emergencies);
38. poziva Komisijo, naj poenostavi in pospeši postopek, ob tem pa upošteva začetne ocene neposredne škode v državi, ki jo je prizadela nesreča, da bi bil solidarnostni sklad EU kar najučinkovitejši;
Calls on the Commission to simplify and speed up the process, taking into account the initial estimates of direct damage to a disaster-stricken country so that the EU Solidarity Fund offers the maximum efficiency;
41. meni, da so ukrepi iz člena 4 Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije prestrogi in ne predvidevajo drugih razmer istega tipa, kot je suša; zato bi bilo treba, čeprav neposredna pomoč za glavne žrtve (fizične in pravne osebe) ni možna, v Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije vključiti novo, prožnejšo klavzulo, ki omogoča dodelitev posrednih pomoči;
Considers that the eligible operations listed in Article 4 of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) are too restrictive and do not allow for other situations of the same nature, such as droughts; in this context, and regardless of the fact that it is not practicable for the main victims (private individuals and businesses) to receive direct aid, a new, more flexible clause should be introduced in the EUSF which would enable indirect support to be granted;