natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice lahko sklepajo ali sprejemajo dvostranske ali večstranske sporazume ali dogovore, ki zadevajo področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa, po začetku njegove veljavnosti, v kolikor ti sporazumi ali dogovori omogočajo razširitev ali poglobitev ciljev tega okvirnega sklepa, vključno s cilji varstva podatkov .
Member States may conclude or bring into force bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements which concern the scope of this Framework Decision after it has entered into force in so far as such agreements or arrangements provide for the objectives of this Framework Decision to be extended or enlarged , including the data protection objectives of this Framework Decision. ,
Člen 36, odstavek 4
Article 36, paragraph 4
Države članice v [... letih] po začetku učinkovanja tega sklepa obvestijo Svet in Komisijo o obstoječih sporazumih ali dogovorih v smislu odstavka 1, ki jih želijo še naprej uporabljati.
Member States shall inform the Council and the Commission within [… years] of entry into force of this Decision of existing agreements or arrangements within the meaning of the first paragraph which they wish to continue to apply.
Države članice v [... letih] po začetku veljavnosti tega okvirnega sklepa obvestijo Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisijo o obstoječih sporazumih ali dogovorih v smislu odstavka 1, ki jih želijo še naprej uporabljati.
Member States shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission within [… years] of entry into force of this Framework Decision of existing agreements or arrangements within the meaning of the first paragraph which they wish to continue to apply.
Parlament mora sodelovati tudi pri sprejemanju drugih ukrepov, ki vplivajo na okvirni sklep Sveta.
Parliament must likewise be involved as regards other measures affecting the Council framework decision.
Člen 36, odstavek 5
Article 36, paragraph 5
Države članice obvestijo Svet in Komisijo o vseh novih sporazumih ali dogovorih v smislu odstavka 2 v treh mesecih po njihovem podpisu, oziroma v primeru pravnih instrumentov, ki so že bili podpisani pred sprejetjem tega sklepa, v treh mesecih po začetku njihove veljavnosti.
Member States shall also inform the Council and the Commission of all new agreements or arrangements within the meaning of paragraph 2 within 3 months of their signing or, in the case of instruments which were signed before adoption of this Decision, within three months of their entry into force.
Države članice obvestijo Evropski Parlament, Svet in Komisijo o vseh novih sporazumih ali dogovorih v smislu odstavka 2 v treh mesecih po njihovem podpisu, oziroma v primeru pravnih instrumentov, ki so že bili podpisani pred sprejetjem tega okvirnega sklepa, v treh mesecih po začetku njihove veljavnosti.
Member States shall also inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of all new agreements or arrangements within the meaning of paragraph 2 within 3 months of their signing or, in the case of instruments which were signed before adoption of this Framework Decision, within three months of their entry into force.
Parlament mora sodelovati tudi pri sprejemanju drugih ukrepov, ki vplivajo na okvirni sklep Sveta.
Parliament must likewise be involved as regards other measures affecting the Council framework decision .
Države članice predložijo generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta in Komisiji besedilo določb, s katerimi v nacionalno zakonodajo prenašajo obveznosti, ki jim jih nalaga ta sklep.
Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Decision.
Pri tem lahko vsaka država članica navede, da bo ta sklep takoj uporabljala v odnosih s tistimi državami članicami, ki podajo enako izjavo.
When doing so, each Member State may indicate that it will apply immediately this Decision in its relations with those Member States which have given the same notification.
Države članice predložijo generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta besedilo določb, s katerimi v nacionalno zakonodajo prenašajo obveznosti, ki jim jih nalaga ta okvirni sklep.
Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision.
Pri tem lahko vsaka država članica navede, da bo ta okvirni sklep takoj uporabljala v odnosih s tistimi državami članicami, ki podajo enako izjavo.
When doing so, each Member State may indicate that it will apply immediately this Framework Decision in its relations with those Member States which have given the same notification.
Generalni sekretariat Sveta prejete izjave posreduje državam članicam, Evropskemu parlamentu in Komisiji.
The General Secretariat of the Council shall forward the notifications received to the Member States , the European Parliament and the Commission.
Uskladitev člena 37 s členom 33.
Coordination of article 37 with article 33
Člen 37 a (novo)
Article 37 a (new)
Svet vsaki dve leti izvede oceno upravne, tehnične in finančne uporabe in izvajanja okvirnega sklepa.
The Council shall carry out an evaluation of the administrative, technical and financial application and implementation of this Framework Decision every two years.
Posamezni vidiki avtomatiziranega iskanja in primerjave podatkov DNA in daktiloskopskih podatkov se ocenijo šest mesecev po začetku veljavnosti okvirnega sklepa.
The modalities of the automated searching and comparison of DNA and dactyloscopic data shall be evaluated six months after the date on which this Framework Decision takes effect.
Za podatke v registrih motornih vozil se prva ocena izvede tri mesece po tem datumu.
For vehicle registration data, this first evaluation shall take place three months after that date.
Ta poročila se posredujejo Evropskemu parlamentu in Komisiji.
Evaluation reports shall be transmitted to the European Parliament and the Commission.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi pobude za sklep Sveta o pospešitvi čezmejnega sodelovanja zlasti na področju boja proti terorizmu in čezmejnemu kriminalu ( 2007/0804(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the initiative for a Council Decision on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime ( 2007/0804(CNS) )
v pismu z dne 19. april 2007 ste v skladu s členom 35(2) Poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o točnosti in primernosti pravne podlage predlaganega sklepa.
By letter of 19 April 2007 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the proposed decision was valid and appropriate.
Zgoraj omenjeno vprašanje je odbor obravnaval na seji dne 2. maja 2007.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 02 May 2007.
Predlagana pravna podlaga je člen 34(2)(c) Pogodbe o EU.
The legal basis proposed is Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty.
Glavni poročevalec odbora, Fausto Correia, pa meni, da bi bilo primernejše kot sprejetje sklepa po členu 34(2)(c), sprejetje okvirnega sklepa v skladu s členom 34(2)(b).
The lead committee's rapporteur, Mr Correia, considers, however, that it would be more appropriate to adopt a framework decision under Article 34(2)(b), rather than a decision pursuant to Article 34(2)(c).
Glavna razlika, kar zadeva Evropski parlament, med sklepi po členu 34(2)(c) in okvirnimi sklepi, ki se sprejemajo po členu 34(2)(b) je, da medtem ko je Parlament vprašan za mnenje o sklepu ali okvirnem sklepu v skladu s členom 39(1) pogodbe o EU, člen 34(2)(c) omogoča Svetu, da kasneje sprejme izvedbene ukrepe s kvalificirano večino brez posvetovanja s Parlamentom.
The crucial difference, as far as the European Parliament is concerned, between decisions pursuant to Article 34(2)(c) and framework decisions adopted under Article 34(2)(b) is that whereas Parliament is consulted on the decision or framework decision itself pursuant to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, Article 34(2)(c) empowers the Council subsequently to adopt implementing measures by a qualified majority without consulting Parliament.
Ustrezne določbe Pogodbe o EU
Pertinent provisions of the EU Treaty
Na področjih iz tega naslova se države članice v Svetu medsebojno obveščajo in posvetujejo, zato da bi uskladile svoje ukrepe.
In the areas referred to in this title, Member States shall inform and consult one another within the Council with a view to coordinating their action.
V ta namen vzpostavijo sodelovanje med pristojnimi službami svojih uprav.
To that end, they shall establish collaboration between the relevant departments of their administrations.
Svet sprejema ukrepe in spodbuja sodelovanje z uporabo ustrezne oblike in ustreznih postopkov iz tega naslova, s čimer prispeva k doseganju ciljev Unije.
The Council shall take measures and promote cooperation, using the appropriate form and procedures as set out in this title, contributing to the pursuit of the objectives of the Union .
sprejema skupna stališča, s katerimi opredeli pristop Unije do posamezne zadeve;
adopt common positions defining the approach of the Union to a particular matter;
sprejema okvirne sklepe zaradi približevanja zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic.
adopt framework decisions for the purpose of approximation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.
sprejema sklepe za vse druge namene, ki so skladni s cilji tega naslova, razen za približevanje zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic.
adopt decisions for any other purpose consistent with the objectives of this title, excluding any approximation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.
Ti sklepi so zavezujoči in nimajo neposrednega učinka; Svet s kvalificirano večino sprejme ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje teh sklepov na ravni Unije;
These decisions shall be binding and shall not entail direct effect; the Council, acting by a qualified majority, shall adopt measures necessary to implement those decisions at the level of the Union ;
pripravlja konvencije, ki jih priporoči v sprejetje državam članicam v skladu z njihovimi ustavnimi pravili.
establish conventions which it shall recommend to the Member States for adoption in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.
Države članice začnejo ustrezne postopke v roku, ki ga določi Svet.
Member States shall begin the procedures applicable within a time limit to be set by the Council.
Konvencije začnejo veljati, ko jih sprejme najmanj polovica držav članic, in veljajo za te države članice, razen če ni določeno drugače.
Unless they provide otherwise, conventions shall, once adopted by at least half of the Member States, enter into force for those Member States.
Ukrepi za izvajanje konvencij se sprejmejo v Svetu z dvotretjinsko večino pogodbenic.
Measures implementing conventions shall be adopted within the Council by a majority of two thirds of the Contracting Parties
Cilj in vsebina pobude za sklep Sveta
Aim and content of the initiative for a Council Decision
Cilj predlaganega sklepa Sveta je boj proti terorizmu in čezmejnemu kriminalu, s pomočjo spodbujanja in krepitve čezmejnega sodelovanja prek izmenjave informacij med organi, ki so odgovorni za preprečevanje in preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj.
The proposed Council Decision intends to combat terrorism and cross-border crimes by facilitating and strengthening cross-border cooperation through the exchange of information between agencies responsible for the prevention and the investigation of criminal offences.
Cilj je uvedba postopkov za spodbujanje hitrih, učinkovitih in cenovno dostopnih sredstev izmenjave podatkov.
The aim is to introduce procedures for promoting fast, efficient and inexpensive means of data exchange.
Za skupno uporabo podatkov bi morali ti postopki biti predmet odgovornosti, vključevati pa bi morali ustrezna zagotovila o točnosti in varnosti podatkov med prenosom in shranjevanjem ter postopke za evidentiranje izmenjave podatkov in omejitve glede uporabe izmenjanih podatkov.
For the joint use of data those procedures should be subject to accountability and incorporate appropriate guarantees as to the accuracy and security of the data during transmission and storage as well as procedures for recording data exchange and restrictions on the use of information exchanged.
Te pogoje izpolnjuje prümska pogodba s 27. maja 2005 med Belgijo, Nemčijo, Španijo, Francijo, Luksemburgom, Nizozemsko in Avstrijo o tesnejšem čezmejnem sodelovanju, še posebno za boj proti terorizmu, čezmejnemu kriminalu in nezakonitemu priseljevanju.
These requirements are satisfied by the Prüm Treaty of 27 May 2005 between Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Austria on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism, cross-border crime and illegal migration.
Da bi se lahko izpolnile vsebinske zahteve iz Haaškega programa za vse države članice in da se lahko dosežejo njegovi cilji tudi v časovnem smislu, bi bistveni deli Prümske pogodbe morali postati veljavni za vse države članice.
In order that the substantive requirements of the Hague Programme can be fulfilled for all Member States and that its targets in terms of timescale can be achieved, the essential parts of the Prüm Treaty need to be made applicable to all Member States.
Ta sklep Sveta zato temelji na glavnih določbah prümske pogodbe.
This Council Decision should therefore be based on the main provisions of the Prüm Treaty.
Cilj in vsebina dokumenta se na podlagi preambule lahko razčlenita kot sledi:
The aim and content of the document, according to the preamble, may be analysed as follows:
Iz uvodne izjave 2 je jasno razvidno, da je eden izmed ciljev Evropske unije, da državljanom zagotovi visoko stopnjo varnosti na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice "s pripravo skupnih postopkov držav članic pri policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah".
Recital 2 makes it plain that that one of the goals of the European Union is to give citizens a high degree of security in the area of freedom, security and justice "by developing common procedures among the Member States in the field of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters".
Uvodna izjava 9 izpostavlja, da natančne informacije za "učinkovito mednarodno sodelovanje" potrebujejo postopke v državah članicah za "spodbujanje hitrih, učinkovitih in cenovno dostopnih sredstev izmenjave podatkov".
Recital 9 points out that precise information for "an effective international cooperation" needs procedures in the Member States for "promoting fast, efficient and inexpensive means of data exchange".
Preambula nadalje obrazloži potrebo po sistemu za iskanje zadetkov, ki bi omogočal državam članicam, ki iščejo podatke, da dostopajo do podatkov iz zbirk podatkov o raziskavah DNA in avtomatskih sistemov za daktiloskopsko identifikacijo drugih držav članic.
The preamble goes on to explain the need for a "hit/no hit" system to enable searching Member States to access data from other Member States' national DNA analysis files and automatic dactyloscopic identification systems.
Države članice bi morale imeti dostop do zbirk podatkov o raziskavah DNA drugih držav članic.
Member States are to have access rights to each other's DNA analysis files.
To bi bilo treba doseči s povezovanjem nacionalnih zbirk podatkov v mrežo.
All this should be achieved by networking national databases.
Nadaljnji namen tega je, da omogoča tesno sodelovanje med policijskimi organi, vključno s skupnimi varnostnimi operacijami in čezmejnim posredovanjem.
It is further intended that this should allow close cooperation between police authorities, including joint security operations and cross-border intervention.
Preambula se nadalje sklicuje na zagotavljanje pravice do zasebnosti in varovanje osebnih podatkov.
The preamble further refers to guaranteeing the right to privacy and the protection of personal data.
Glede na to, da ni mogoče izvajati predhodnega preverjanja v zvezi s tem v primerih čezmejnega spletnega dostopa do zbirk podatkov, je treba izvajati naknadno preverjanje.
Since prior checks cannot be carried out in this regard in the case of cross-border on-line access to data bases, post hoc monitoring is to be carried out.
Uvodna izjava 18 jasno določa, da je naloga držav članic, da poskrbijo "za učinkovito izvajanje vseh pravil, ki se v tem sklepu nanašajo na varstvo podatkov".
Recital 18 makes it clear that it will be for Member States to provide for "efficient implementation of all data protection rules contained in this Decision".
Poglavje II obravnava spletni dostop in nadaljnje zahtevke ter vsebuje določbe o profilih DNK in o daktiloskopskih podatkih ter podatkih o registraciji vozil.
Chapter II deals with on-line access and follow-up requests and contains rules concerning the DNA Profiles and the Dactyloscopic Data and Vehicle Registration Data.
Vsi oddelki se sklicujejo na "nacionalne kontaktne točke", ki so pristojne za posredovanje podatkov in za katere se uporablja "veljavno nacionalno pravo" (členi 6, 11 in 12).
All sections refer to "national contact points" competent for the supply of data and governed by the "applicable national law" (Article 6, Article 11 and Article 12).
Poglavje III, ki obravnava "množične prireditve" jasno določa, da mora biti posredovanje neosebnih podatkov "po nacionalni zakonodaji države članice pošiljateljice dovoljeno" (člen 13).
Chapter III, treating "major events", makes it clear that the supply of non-personal data must be "permitted under the supplying of the Member State's national law" (Article 13).
Poglavje IV se nanaša na posredovanje podatkov za preprečitev terorističnih kaznivih dejanj in določa, da država pošiljateljica "ob upoštevanju nacionalne zakonodaje" naloži pogoje za uporabo teh podatkov s strani države prejemnice, ki je nanje vezana (člen 16).
Chapter IV refers to the supply of information to prevent terrorist offences and states that the supplying Member State imposes the conditions on the use made of the data by the receiving Member State - which will be bound by them - "in compliance with national law" (Article 16).
Poglavje V obravnava druge vrste sodelovanja, kot so skupne operacije, za katere je treba upoštevati kar "je po pravu države članice dopustno", kar zadeva pravila o civilni odgovornosti pa "zakonodajo države članice, na ozemlju katere delujejo" (člena 17 in 21).
Chapter V is concerned with other forms of cooperation, such as joint operations, for which it is necessary to refer to what "Member States' law permits" and, for the rules of civil liability, to "the law of the Member State in whose territory they are operating" (Article 17 and Article 21).
Poglavje VI vsebuje splošne določbe o varovanju podatkov in jasno določa, da mora vsaka država članica jamčiti za stopnjo varovanja "v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji", ki je najmanj enaka tisti iz konvencije Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov (člena 25 in 27).
Chapter VI sets out the general provisions on data protection and makes it plain that each Member State is to guarantee a level of protection "in its national law" at least equal to that resulting from the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals (Article 25 and Article 27).
V pismu predsednika pristojnega odbora beremo:
The letter from the Chair of the lead committee states as follows:
"Pobuda želi doseči približevanje zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic.
"The initiative seeks to achieve approximation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.
V teh razmerah poročevalec meni, da bi bilo primernejše kot sprejetje sklepa po členu 34(2)(c), sprejetje okvirnega sklepa v skladu s členom 34(2)(b)."
Under those circumstances, the rapporteur considers that it would be more appropriate to adopt a framework decision pursuant to Article 34 (2)(b) rather than a decision pursuant to Article 34 (2)(c)".
Vprašanje je torej, ali je namen predlaganega instrumenta približevanje zakonov in ureditev držav članic; če je tako, potem mora instrument imeti obliko okvirnega sklepa v skladu s členom 24(2)(b) in ne sklepa v skladu s členom 34(2)(c), saj slednji izključuje vsako približevanje zakonov in ureditev držav članic.
The question is therefore whether the proposed instrument is for the purpose of approximating the laws and regulations of the Member States, if so the instrument should take the form of a framework decision within the meaning of Article 34(2)(b) and not a decision pursuant to Article 34(2)(c), since that provision expresses excludes any approximation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.
Splošni razmisleki o pravni podlagi glede na sodno prakso
General considerations on legal basis from the case-law
Vsi akti Skupnosti morajo temeljiti na pravni podlagi, ki je določena v Pogodbi (ali v drugem pravnem aktu, ki ga imajo namen izvrševati).
All Community acts must be founded upon a legal basis laid down in the Treaty (or in another legal act which they are intended to implement).
Pravna podlaga opredeljuje pristojnost Skupnosti ratione materiae in podrobno določa, kako se ta pristojnost izvaja, zlasti zakonodajni(e) instrument(e), ki se jih lahko uporabi v postopku odločanja.
The legal basis defines the Community's competence ratione materiae and specifies how that competence is to be exercised, namely the legislative instrument(s) which may be used and the decision-making procedure.
Zadeva 45/86, Komisija proti Svetu [1987] Zbornik 1439, odst.
Case 45/86, Commission v. Council [1987] ECR 1439, para.
Na dve stvari je dobro opozoriti, čeprav prva nima neposrednega vpliva na ustreznost pravne podlage, ki jo je izbral Svet, vendar je vseeno vredno opozoriti nanjo.
Two preliminary remarks are worth making, although the first has no direct bearing on the appropriateness of the legal basis selected by the Council, but is worth making all the same.
Na vrhu v Edinburgu so se države članice dogovorile, da bi moralo načelo sorazmernosti, določeno v členu 3B (tretji odstavek) podobe o ES (sedaj člen 5) pomeniti, da je treba kadarkoli je potrebno zakonodajno ukrepanje Skupnosti, dati prednost direktivam pred uredbami in okvirnim direktivam pred podrobnejšimi ukrepi.
At the Edinburgh Summit, the Member States agreed that the principle of proportionality codified in Article 3B (third paragraph) of the EC Treaty (now Article 5) should imply that wherever legislative intervention by the Community is required, preference should be given to directives over regulations and to framework directives over detailed measures.
Enako stališče je bilo kasneje izraženo v protokolu o subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti k amsterdamski pogodbi in v beli knjigi o evropskem upravljanju
The same view was later endorsed in the Protocol on subsidiarity and proportionality to the Treaty of Amsterdam and in the White Paper on European Governance
glej Prechal, Adieu à la Directive?
See Prechal, Adieu à la Directive?
Poleg tega, in ta pripomba je zelo pomembna za vprašanje ustreznosti izbrane pravne podlage, se je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti zelo nedvomno izjasnilo v svoji sodbi s 16. junija 2005 v zadevi C-¸105/03 Pupino, in sicer da "je besedilo člena 34(2)(b) EU zelo tesno povezano s tretjim odstavkom člena 249 ES.
Secondly, and this observation is highly relevant to the question of the appropriateness of the legal basis selected, the Court of Justice made it clear in its judgment of 16 June 2005 in Case C-105/03 Pupino , that "the wording of Article 34(2)(b) EU is very closely inspired by that of the third paragraph of Article 249 EC.
Posledično je okvirni sklep enakovreden direktivi iz prvega stebra, vendar brez neposrednega učinka.
Consequently, a framework decision is the equivalent of a first-pillar directive, but without direct effect.
Glede na to, da "sklepi" v smislu člena 24(2)(c) izrecno izključujejo vsako približevanje nacionalnih zakonov in ureditev, je samo po sebi umevno, da če obravnavana pobuda vključuje tako približevanje, bi morala imeti obliko okvirnega sklepa v skladu s členom 34(2)(b).
Since "decisions" within the meaning of Article 34(2)(c) expressly exclude any approximation of national laws and regulations, it goes without saying that if the initiative under consideration involves any such approximation, it should be take the form of a framework decision pursuant to Article 34(2)(b) instead.
Zaključil je (v odst.
He noted (at para.