natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V poročilu je zapisano opažanje, da je nacionalna zakonodaja pogosto nezadostna za uporabo pravnih sredstev proti podjetjem za imeniške storitve s sedežem v drugi državi članici, in zato Komisijo poziva, naj olajša tesnejše čezmejno sodelovanje med nacionalnimi organi ter jim omogoči, da bodo žrtvam lahko zagotovili učinkovitejše pravno varstvo.
The report also notes that national legislation is often inadequate to pursue remedies against business-directory companies that are based in other Member States and therefore urges the Commission to facilitate more active cross-border co-operation among national authorities in order to enable them to provide a more effective remedy to victims.
V Belgiji lahko na primer vsi prizadeti zaradi zavajajoče prakse sprožijo sodni postopek v državi bivanja; žrtve enega od zavajajočih poslovnih imenikov so tudi zmagale v sodnem postopku (poslovni imenik bo moral plačati kazen), čeprav ob nastajanju tega besedila pritožbeni postopek v tej zadevi še ni končan.
In Belgium, for instance, all those affected by misleading practices are able to take legal action in their country of residence and a case had indeed been won by the victims of one of the misleading business directories (a fine was imposed on the latter), although at the time of writing this case still appears to be sub judice at the appeal stage.
V Avstriji prav tako obstajajo primeri, ko so bile žrtve uspešne v sodnem postopku proti podjetjem za imeniške storitve.
In Austria, there is evidence of court cases successfully brought by victims against business-directory companies.
Po drugi strani so na Češkem žrtve izgubile v zadevi, ki jo je proti njim vložilo podjetje za imeniške storitve, in prav to sproža vprašanje, ali Češka ustrezno izvaja določbe Direktive 2006/114/ES
On the other hand, in the Czech Republic victims appear to have lost a case brought against them by the directory company and this particular case raises serious questions on whether the Czech Republic is adequately implementing the provisions of Directive 2006/114/EC
Ko je imelo eno najpogosteje omenjenih podjetij za imeniške storitve European City Guide sedež v Španiji v Barceloni, je regionalna institucija Generalitat de Cataluna proti njemu trikrat izrekla denarno kazen in izdal odredbo o začasnem enoletnem zaprtju.
In Spain, one of the most mentioned business directory companies, the European City Guide, was fined three times by the Generalitat de Cataluna when it was based in Barcelona and its temporary closure for one year was ordered.
Pozneje se je preselilo v Valencio, kjer zdaj naprej posluje pod nekoliko strožjimi pogoji.
It eventually moved to Valencia where it now continues to operate under somewhat stricter conditions.
Zato poročevalec meni, da to podjetje za imeniške storitve ni storilo dovolj za zagotovitev, da morebitnih strank ne bi zavajalo v podpis oglaševalskih pogodb, ki jih sploh ne želijo.
Your rapporteur therefore feels that this business-directory company has not done enough to ensure that its prospective clients are not misled into signing an advertising contract that they never wanted.
Poleg tega ni dokazov o tem, da bi nacionalni organi drugih držav članic sprožili postopek neposredno na sodiščih v Valencii na podlagi Uredbe (ES) 2006/2004
Moreover, there is no evidence of national authorities from other Member States seeking a remedy directly in Valenician courts on the basis of Regulation (EC) 2006/2004
UL L 364, 9.12.2004, str.
OJ L 364, 9.12.2004, , p.1-11. on co-operation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws.
1–11. o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov.
In the United Kingdom, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is reported to have used the provisions of Regulation (EC) 2006/2004
Ta urad, ki je odgovoren tudi za varstvo potrošnikov, naj bi to uredbo uspešno uporabil za vložitev opustitvene tožbe proti podjetjem iz Belgije in Nizozemske, ki so pošiljala britanskim potrošnikom nenaročene in zavajajoče ponudbe.
The OFT, which is also responsible for consumer protection, appears to have used this regulation successfully to seek an injunction against companies in Belgium and in the Netherlands which were found to be sending out unsolicited and misleading offers to British consumers.
Čeprav je to korak v pravo smer, pa ne nanaša na zavajajoče poslovne imenike.
Although a positive step in the right direction, this case did not concern misleading business directories.
Razen v tem primeru je le malo dokazov o tem, da bi nacionalni organi Uredbo 2006/2004
Other than this case there is little evidence that Regulation 2006/2004
Očitno je tako zaradi stroškov sodnega postopka, zapletenih in dolgih postopkov ter omejene veljavnosti opustitvene tožbe.
This is appears to be due to the cost of bringing action, to the complexity and the length of procedures and to the limited scope of the injunction.
Potreba po okrepitvi nacionalnih organov
The need to strengthen national authorities
Poročilo države članice poziva, naj zagotovijo, da bodo imela podjetja, ki so žrtve zavajajočega oglaševanja, na voljo jasno prepoznaven nacionalni organ, pri katerem se bodo lahko pritožila in poiskala pravno varstvo.
The report urges Member States to ensure that businesses who are victims of misleading advertising have a clearly identifiable national authority with which they can make a complaint and seek a remedy.
Zdaj velikokrat ni tako, saj nacionalni organi za varstvo potrošnikov pogosto ne obravnavajo pritožb podjetij in se omejujejo na pritožbe potrošnikov.
Currently, this is often not the case since national consumer protection authorities often do not cater for complaints from businesses, limiting themselves to complaints from consumers.
Komisijo poziva, naj oblikuje smernice najboljšega ravnanja za nacionalne izvršilne organe, ki bi jih lahko uporabila ob prijavah zavajajočega oglaševanja.
The report also calls on the European Commission to develop best-practice guidelines for national enforcement agencies which may be followed when cases of misleading advertising are brought to their attention.
Zavajajo č i poslovni imeniki s sedežem v tretji državi
Misleading business-directories based in third countries
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov poziva odbor za peticije kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Petitions, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
- ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti določb o ustanovitvi notranjega trga ter zagotavljanju svobode podjetjem, da lahko opravljajo storitve v ostalih državah članicah,
- having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the provisions thereof establishing the internal market and guaranteeing undertakings the freedom to provide services in other Member States,
- ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Tampereju z dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 o ustvarjanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji, ki določajo, da posamezniki in podjetja ne smejo biti ovirani ali odvrnjeni od izvajanja pravic z nezdružljivostjo ali zapletenostjo pravnih ali upravnih sistemov v državah članicah,
- having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999 on the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice in the European Union, which state that individuals and businesses should not be prevented or discouraged from exercising their rights by the incompatibility or complexity of legal and administrative systems in the Member States,
- ob upoštevanju 393 peticij o zavajajočih podjetjih, ki ponujajo imeniške storitve v štiriindvajsetih državah članicah in devetnajstih tretjih državah, ki jih je prejel njegov odbor za peticije,
- having regard to the 393 petitions on misleading directory companies from 24 Member States and 19 third countries received by its Committee on Petitions,
A. ker se dvomljive dejavnosti podjetja European City Guide in drugih podobnih podjetij izvajajo že več desetletij (pri čemer so se ta podjetja v tem času po potrebi preselila, da so lahko nadaljevala svoje dejavnosti in se izognila kaznim) in ker so bila prizadeta številna podjetja,
A. whereas the dubious activities of the European City Guides company (ECG) and other, similar companies stretch back over a number of decades (with the companies concerned relocating over time in order to continue their activities and avoid penalties), and whereas many businesses have been affected,
B. ker so bile dejavnosti podjetja European City Guide obravnavane v sodnih in upravnih postopkih, med drugim pri vrhovnem sodišču in regionalnih vladah v Kataloniji (Španija), katerih rezultat je bila začasna prekinitev dejavnosti podjetja in naložitev globe,
B whereas the activities of ECG have been the subject of legal and administrative action, such as that taken by the High Court and the regional government in Catalonia (Spain), which resulted in the temporary suspension of the company’s activities and the imposition of a fine,
C. ker v primeru, ko so tovrstne goljufije organizirane prek meja in vključujejo dejavnosti v dveh ali več državah članicah, ni mehanizma za čezmejno sodelovanje med organi pregona – ni ne proračuna ne imenika telefonskih številk policije prek meje v drugih oddaljenih državah članicah, zato nacionalni organi izgubijo zanimanje za zasledovanje goljufov, ker so ti izjemno dobro organizirani prek meja, ki jih nacionalni organi sami ne morejo prekoračiti,
C. whereas when a fraud such as this is organised across frontiers and thus involves activity in two or more Member States, there is no mechanism for the national law-enforcement agencies to work together across borders - nor any budget, nor even a telephone directory to discover police contacts across the border or in other distant Member States - and consequently national agencies understandably lose interest in pursuing the fraudsters because they are so well organised across borders which the national agencies themselves cannot cross,
2. predlaga, da Komisija in Svet zagotovita polno izvedbo in uveljavitev direktive Sveta 84/450/EGS z dne 10. septembra 1984 o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju
2 Suggests that the Commission and Council ensure full implementation and enforcement of Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 concerning misleading and comparative advertising
17. (direktiva o zavajajočem oglaševanju) skupaj z direktivo 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu
17. (the Misleading Advertising Directive), along with Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market
4. ob upoštevanju študije o zavajajočih praksah podjetij za imeniške storitve, ki jo je zahteval odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, v kateri sta kot zakonodajni možnosti za rešitev vprašanja zavajajočih podjetjih za imeniške storitve predlagani sprememba Direktive 2006/114/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju
Taking into account the Study on the Misleading Practices of Directory Companies commissioned by its Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, which indicates as possible legislative options for dealing with the problem of misleading directory companies amending Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising
21. , v katero bi vključili „črni“ in „sivi“ seznam praks, ki veljajo kot zavajajoče, ter razširitev področja uporabe direktive o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah na pogodbe o poslovanju med podjetji, zlasti, kar zadeva točko 21 njene priloge I, zahteva, da Komisija do decembra 2009 pripravi poročilo o izvedljivosti in mogočih posledicah takšne spremembe ali razširitve;
21. to include a "black" list of practices that are to be considered misleading and extending the scope of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive to cover B2B contracts with specific regard to point 21 of Annex I thereto, requests the Commission to report by December 2009 on the feasibility and possible consequences of such amendment or extension;
8. poziva države članice, naj aktivno sodelujejo pri odpravi praks zavajajočih podjetij za imeniške storitve in vseh podobnih dejavnosti;
Calls for Member States to cooperate actively to bring an end to the practices of misleading directory companies and any similar activities;
12. poziva nadzorne organe držav članic – v skladu z njihovimi nalogami in pristojnostmi, ki so jim podeljene z nacionalno zakonodajo in zakonodajo EU, zlasti z Uredbo (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov (uredba o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov)
Urges the Member States to take action against all the fraudulent activities engaged in by ECG and other, similar companies, as a last resort by suspending their activities in order to prevent consumers and businesses from being harmed;
13. meni, da so navedene prakse podjetij za imeniške storitve ne le neskladne s primernim obnašanjem in standardi pravičnega trgovanja, ampak so tudi večinoma povezane z goljufijami ter drugimi kaznivimi dejanji in prekrški, zato poziva ustrezne nadzorne organe, policijo in tožilstva v državah članicah – vključno z Europolom in Eurojustom – k izvedbi podrobne preiskave praks podjetij, na podlagi katere bo mogoče vložiti obtožnico proti krivcem iz EU; če ti prihajajo iz tretjih držav, poziva Komisijo, naj stori vse za sklenitev mednarodnih sporazumov z zadevnimi državami v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004;
Considers that directory companies’ practices as described are not only inconsistent with decent behaviour and with standards of fair trading, but also for the most part bear the hallmark of fraud and of other criminal acts and offences, and hence calls upon the appropriate supervisory bodies, police forces and public prosecutor's offices in the Member States – and also upon Europol and Eurojust – to carry out a detailed investigation into the organisers’ practices, possibly leading to the bringing of charges against guilty parties coming from the EU; should they come from third countries, calls upon the Commission to make every effort to conclude international agreements with the countries concerned pursuant to Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004;
- obvezen oddelek naročila se standardizira tako, da vsebuje sporazume, ki so v skladu z ustreznim ravnanjem in ki pregledno navajajo osnovna pravna razmerja (vključno z jasno navedbo cene); vsebino tega oddelka lahko preverijo ustrezni organi držav članic (kot so inšpektorat o trgovskih standardih ali organi za varstvo osebnih podatkov);
- that the mandatory section of an order be standardised in such a way as to ensure that it contains agreements which are in accordance with decent behaviour and which transparently define basic legal relationships (including a clear statement of price); the content of that section could be verified by the appropriate bodies within the Member States (such as the trading standards inspectorate or the authorities responsible for protecting personal data);
- za standardizirane pogodbe ali naročila, pri katerih šibkejša stranka nima možnosti, da bi jih spremenila in jih lahko samo sprejme ali zavrne, bi morala veljati podobna pravila, kot veljajo za nepoštene poslovne prakse, tudi če šibkejša stranka pogodbe ali naročila ni potrošnik;
- that form-based contracts or orders, where the weaker party to the contract or order has no possibility of altering it and can only accept or reject it, be subject to similar rules as apply to unfair commercial practices, even if the weaker party to the contract or order is not a consumer;
- standardizirane pogodbe ali naročila bi bilo treba preveriti s podobnim preskusom „povprečnega potrošnika“, kot se izvaja pri nepoštenih poslovnih praksah, tudi če šibkejša stranka pogodbe ali naročila ni potrošnik;
- that form-based contracts or orders be subject to an ‘average consumer’ test similar to that which applies to unfair commercial practices, even if the weaker party to the contract or order is not a consumer;
15. opozarja Komisijo, da tovrstne zavajajoče prakse podjetij za imeniške storitve niso usmerjene zgolj na podjetnike, ampak tudi na fizične osebe (vključno s političnimi predstavniki), ki niso poslovno dejavne, vendar prejemajo ponudbe o fiktivnih vnosih v biografske publikacije (na primer „Kdo je kdo“, osebnost leta na navedenem področju in tako dalje), ki temeljijo na istem nepoštenem načelu, zato je treba v prihodnjih ukrepih prepovedati tudi tovrstne zavajajoče prakse.
Points out to the Commission that misleading practices of this nature on the part of directory companies are targeted not only at entrepreneurs but also at natural persons (including political representatives) who are not engaged in business practices but who receive offers concerning fictitious entries in biographical publications (such as ‘Who's Who’, Personality of the Year in a given field, and so on), and are based on the same dishonesty, and that hence future measures must also outlaw misleading practices of this kind.
o vplivu ponarejanja na mednarodno trgovino
on the impact of counterfeiting on international trade
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................22
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 21
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................27
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................26
– ob upoštevanju poročila Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) iz leta 2007 o gospodarskem vplivu ponarejanja in piratstva,
– having regard to the 2007 report by the OECD entitled ”The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy”,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. novembra 2005 o izvajanju Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti – Moderna politika za MSP za rast in zaposlovanje ( KOM(2005)0551 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 10 November 2005 entitled ”Implementing the Community Lisbon programme – a modern SME policy for growth and employment” ( COM(2005)0551 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 4. oktobra 2006 z naslovom "Konkurenca v svetu – Prispevek k strategiji EU za gospodarsko rast in delovna mesta" ( KOM(2006)0567 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 4 October 2006 entitled ”Global Europe: competing in the world – A Contribution to the EU's Growth and Jobs Strategy” ( COM(2006)0567 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 18. aprila 2007 z naslovom "Globalna Evropa: Okrepljeno partnerstvo za olajšanje dostopa na trge evropskim izvoznikom ( KOM(2007)0183 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 18 April 2007 entitled ”Global Europe: a stronger partnership to deliver market access for European exporters” ( COM(2007)0183 ),
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0053 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0053 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. maja 2007 o globalni Evropi – zunanji vidiki konkurenčnosti,
– having regard to its resolution of 22 May 2007 on Global Europe – external aspects of competitiveness
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. junija 2008 o izvajanju trgovinske politike preko učinkovitih uvoznih in izvoznih pravil ter postopkov
– having regard to its resolution of 5 June 2008 on implementing trade policy through efficient import and export rules and procedures
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0247 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0247 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. junija 2006 o čezatlantskih gospodarskih odnosih EU–ZDA
– having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on EU-US transatlantic economic relations
UL C 308 E, 16.12.2006, str.
OJ C 308 E, 16.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. decembra 2007 o gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosih s Korejo
– having regard to its resolution of 13 December 2007 on economic and trade relations with Korea
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. maja 2008 o trgovinskih in gospodarskih odnosih z državami jugovzhodne Azije (ASEAN)
– having regard to its resolution of 8 May 2008 on Trade and Economic Relations with the countries of South East Asia (ASEAN)
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0195 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0195 . ,
UL C 233 E, 28.09.2006, str.
OJ C 233 E, 28.9.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. oktobra 2006 z naslovom EU-Kitajska: Tesnejši partnerici, naraščajoče odgovornosti ( KOM(2006)0631 ) in spremnega delovnega dokumenta Komisije k dokumentu z naslovom Tesnejše partnerstvo, več odgovornosti – Dokument o trgovinski in naložbeni politiki EU-Kitajska: Konkurenca in partnerstvo" ( KOM(2006)0632 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 25 October 2006 entitled ”EU – China: Closer partners, growing responsibilities” ( COM(2006)0631 ) and the document accompanying it, entitled ”Closer Partners, Growing Responsibilities – a policy paper on EU-China trade and investment: Competition and Partnership” ( COM(2006)0632 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3286/94 z dne 22. decembra 1994 o določitvi postopkov Skupnosti na področju skupne trgovinske politike za zagotovitev izvrševanja pravic Skupnosti po mednarodnih pravilih trgovanja, zlasti tistih, ki so dogovorjena v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), (uredba o trgovinskih ovirah),
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 of 22 December 1994 laying down Community procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community's rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (Trade Barriers Regulation (TBR)),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. julija 2008 o strategiji pravic industrijske lastnine za Evropo ( KOM(2008)0465 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 16 July 2008 entitled ”An Industrial Property Rights Strategy for Europe” ( COM(2008)0465 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 21. februarja 2001 o akcijskem programu: okrepitev boja proti HIV/aidsu, malariji in tuberkulozi v okviru zmanjševanja revščine ( KOM(2001)0096 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 21 February 2001 entitled ”Programme for action: Accelerated action on HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in the context of poverty reduction” ( COM(2001)0096 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. februarja 2006 o dopolnitvi akcijskega programa: okrepitev boja proti HIV/aidsu, malariji in tuberkulozi v okviru zmanjševanja revščine ( KOM(2001)0093 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 26 February 2006 entitled ”Update on the EC Programme for Action – Accelerated action on HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in the context of poverty reduction” ( COM(2003)0093 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. oktobra 2004 z naslovom Skladna evropska politika za zunanje ukrepe v boju proti boleznim HIV/AIDS, malarija in tuberkuloza ( KOM(2004)0726 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 26 October 2004 entitled ”A Coherent European Policy Framework for External Action to Confront HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Tuberculosis” ( COM(2004)0726 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 816/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o prisilnih licencah za patente, ki so povezani s proizvodnjo farmacevtskih izdelkov za izvoz v države s težavami v javnem zdravju,
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 816/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on compulsory licensing of patents relating to the manufacture of pharmaceutical products for export to countries with public health problems,