natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na trgu dela se te nizko plačane dejavnosti ne vrednotijo visoko, zato se lahko družbena neenakost še nadaljuje, spodkopava pa se tudi vključevanje v družbo in na trg dela.
These low paid activities do not receive a highly valued response in the labour market and thus may favour the perpetuation of social inequalities as well as undermine social and professional integration.
Vodstvo zaporov bi bilo treba spodbuditi, da bi zagotovilo ukrepe za visokokakovostno poklicno usposabljanje, prilagojeno potrebam na trgu dela, pa tudi za popestritev poklicnih možnosti brez spolnih stereotipov.
Prison authorities should be encouraged to provide high quality vocational training measures that are adapted to the labour market needs as well as diversified employment opportunities free from gender stereotypes.
Kot del procesa za rehabilitacijo zapornikov bi morale zaporne institucije sodelovati z zunanjimi podjetji za zaposlovanje zapornikov.
The collaboration of prison institutions with external firms for the employment of prisoners should also be promoted as part of the prisoner's rehabilitation process.
Večina zapornikov se mora ob izpustu iz zapora soočiti s široko paleto težav, na primer z iskanjem bivališča in rednega dohodka, z obnavljanjem odnosov in skrbjo za otroke ali druge odvisne družinske člane.
Upon leaving prison most prisoners have to face a broad range of crucial problems such as ensure housing, regular income, heal relationships with and provide for children or other dependent family members.
Uspešno vključitev zapornikov v družbo je treba pripraviti med zaporno kaznijo in po njej s sodelovanjem ustanov za socialne storitve in drugih ustreznih organizacij, da bi zagotovili gladek prehod iz zapora na svobodo.
Successful social inclusion of prisoners must be prepared during and after imprisonment with the cooperation of social services and other relevant organizations in order to ensure a smooth transition from prison to liberty.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti psihološki pripravi (obravnavanje kaznivih dejanj, reševanje travm in odvisnosti z ustrezno psihološko podporo in obravnavo) in zagotovitvi družbene podpore pri izpustu (priprava pozitivnih projektov itd.).
Particular attention must be granted to the psychological preparation (processing of crime, handling of traumas and addictions through appropriate psychological support and treatment) and to the provision of social support for release (working out positive projects etc.)
o trajnostnem kmetijstvu in bioplinu: potreba po spremembi zakonodaje EU
on sustainable agriculture and biogas: a need for review of EU legislation
Werner Langen , Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko
Werner Langen , Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko (*) ........................15
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (*) ..........16
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................18
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 19
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................21
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................22
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 7. decembra 2005 o akcijskem načrtu za biomaso ( KOM(2005)0628 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 7 December 2005 entitled 'Biomass action plan' ( COM(2005)0628 ),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. januarja 2007 o časovnem načrtu obnovljive energije – obnovljiva energija v 21. stoletju: izgradnja trajne prihodnosti ( KOM(2006)0848 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 10 January 2007 entitled 'Renewable energy road map - Renewable energies in the 21st century: building a more sustainable future’ ( COM(2006)0848 ),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. novembra 1997 na temo "Energija za prihodnost: obnovljivi viri energije-Bela knjiga za strategijo in akcijski načrt Skupnosti" ( KOM(1997)0599 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 26 November 1997 entitled 'Energy for the future: renewable sources of energy - White Paper for a Community strategy and action plan' ( COM(1997)0599 ),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. maja 2004 na temo "Delež obnovljive energije v EU – poročilo Komisije" v skladu s členom 3 direktive 2001/77/ES, ocena učinka zakonodajnih instrumentov in drugih politik Skupnosti na razvoj prispevka virov obnovljivih energij v EU in predlogov za konkretne ukrepe ( KOM(2004)0366 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 26 May 2004 entitled 'The share of renewable energy in the EU - Commission Report in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 2001/77/EC, evaluation of the effect of legislative instruments and other Community policies on the development of the contribution of renewable energy sources in the EU and proposals for concrete actions' ( COM(2004)0366 ),
- ob upoštevanju programa Komisije "Inteligentna energija - Evropa"
- having regard to the Commission's 'Intelligent Energy - Europe' Programme
Odločba št. 1230/2003/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2003 o sprejetju večletnega akcijskega programa na področju energije: "Inteligentna energija — Evropa", (2003 — 2006) (UL L 176, 15.7.2003, str.
Decision No 1230/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 adopting a multiannual programme for action in the field of energy: "Intelligent Energy — Europe" (2003 — 2006), OJ L 176, 15.7.2003, p.
29). , programa "Akcijski načrt za biomaso" in sporočila o strategiji EU za biogoriva ( KOM(2006)0034 ),
29. and its Communication of 8 February 2006 entitled 'an EU Strategy for Biofuels' ( COM(2006)0034 ),
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers
1. ter o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP)
1. , and Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
- ob upoštevanju Odločbe 280/2004/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. februarja 2004 o mehanizmu nadzora emisij toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti in izvajanja Kjotskega protokola
- having regard to Decision No 280/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 concerning a mechanism for monitoring Community greenhouse gas emissions and for implementing the Kyoto Protocol
UL L 49, 19.2.2004, str.
OJ L 49, 19.2.2004, p.
- ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije
- having regard to Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. marca 2006 o spodbujanju nasadov kulturnih rastlin za neprehrambene namene
- having regard to its resolution of 23 March 2006 on promotion of crops for non-food purposes
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0034/2008 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and Committee on Environment ( A6‑0034/2008 ),
A. ker bela knjiga za strategijo in akcijski načrt Skupnosti: Energija za prihodnost – obnovljivi viri energije ( KOM(1997)0599 ) določa cilj, ki je povečanje obnovljivih virov energije s 6 % v letu 1995 na 12 % do leta 2010,
A. whereas the White Paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan on Energy for the future - renewable sources of energy ( COM(1997)0599 ) sets the target of increasing renewable energy resources from 6% in 1995 to 12% by 2010,
B. ker Komisija v svojem akcijskem načrtu za biomaso navaja, da se bo morala, če naj bi dosegli ta cilj, količina energije iz biomase več kot podvojiti,
B. whereas the Commission stated in its 'Biomass Action Plan' that, to achieve this goal, the amount of energy produced from biomass would need to more than double,
C. ker sta kmetijstvo in gozdarstvo v Evropski uniji precej prispevala k ublažitvi učinkov podnebnih sprememb, saj so emisije toplogrednih plinov iz kmetijstva od leta 1990 do leta 2004 padle za 10 % v EU-15 in za 14 % v EU-25; ker se pričakuje, da bo raven emisij iz evropskega kmetijstva leta 2010 za 16 % nižja kot leta 1990;
C. whereas agriculture and forestry in the European Union have substantially contributed to mitigating the effects of climate change as evidenced by the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture fell by 10% between 1990 and 2004 in the EU-15, and by 14% in the EU-25; whereas it is expected that, by 2010, emissions from European agriculture will be 16 per cent below their 1990 level,
D. ker je potencial za močan dvig proizvodnje bioplina velik, zlasti če upoštevamo možnosti, ki jih ponujajo živinoreja (gnoj), blato iz čistilnih naprav, odpadki in rastline, neprimerne za hrano ali krmo, ki v proizvodnji bioplina veljajo za prednostne materiale; ker pa je treba upoštevati vpliv energetske uporabe gnoja na strukturo tal in na življenje v njem,
D. whereas there is significant potential for a considerable increase in biogas production, particularly given the potential contributions from livestock-production (manure), sludge, waste, and plants unsuitable for food and feed production as preferred biogas-materials; whereas, however, account must be taken of the impact of the energy use of farm manure on soil structure and soil life,
E. ker je bilo do sedaj iz gnoja, energetskih rastlin, blata iz čistilnih naprav in organskih odpadkov proizvedenega samo 50 PJ bioplina, s tem da potencial zgolj iz gnoja znaša 827 PJ,
E. whereas so far only 50 PJ of biogas are produced on the basis of manure, energy plants, sludge and organic waste, while the potential from manure alone is 827 PJ,
F. ker so proizvodnja bioplina in obrati za pridobivanje bioplina v Evropi neenako porazdeljeni, kar še dodatno dokazuje, da potencial ni v celoti izkoriščen,
F. whereas the production of biogas and biogas-installation are unevenly distributed in Europe, further demonstrating that the potential is not used to its full extent,
G. ker se lahko bioplin uporablja na mnoge koristne načine, tudi za proizvodnjo električne energije, ogrevanje, hlajenje, avtomobilsko gorivo itd.,
G. whereas biogas can be exploited in many useful ways, including electricity production, heating, cooling, and fuelling cars, etc.,
H. ker uporaba biomase za električno energijo prispeva k zmanjševanju količine toplogrednih plinov, njena uporaba za ogrevanje pa je med najcenejšimi,
H. whereas the use of biomass for electricity can contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and it is considered one of the cheapest energy sources for hearting,
I. ker se je razvoj obratov za proizvodnjo bioplina iz energetskih rastlin zaradi hitre rasti cen žita, oskrbe s hrano in okoljskih zadržkov močno upočasnil,
I. whereas the development of biogas installations based on energy plants has slowed considerably, due to fast rising grain prices, food supply and environmental concerns,
J. ker pomisleki glede povezave med proizvodnjo bioenergije (predvsem bioetanola in biodizla) in rastočimi cenami žit in hrane na svetovnem trgu ne veljajo za proizvodnjo bioplina iz gnoja, blata iz čistilnih naprav, organskih odpadkov in stranskih proizvodov iz poljščin, ki niso primerni za proizvodnjo hrane in krme, poleg dejstva, da je varna predelava teh materialov v vsakem primeru potrebna,
J. whereas concerns in relation to the connection between bioenergy production (primarily bioethanol and biodiesel) and rising grain and food prices on the world market do not relate to biogas production using animal manure, sludge, organic waste and crop by-products unsuitable for food- and feed-production in addition to the fact that the safe processing of these materials is a necessary task in any event,
K. ker je gnoj v novih državah članicah v glavnem mešanica z 20 % ali več slame in predolgim časom med njegovim nastankom in odstranitvijo, zaradi česar ni primeren za nobeno obliko fermentacije,
K. whereas manure in the new Member States comes mainly in the mixed form of 20% straw, or more, and there can be lengthy periods between manure production and manure removal, which is not fit for any type of fermentation,
Bioplin kot ključni vir
Biogas as a vital resource
Okolje, energetska učinkovitost in trajnost
Environment, energy-efficiency and sustainability
8. poudarja, da proizvodnja biogoriv iz odpadkov ne bi smela postati sama po sebi cilj; zmanjšanje odpadkov mora biti prednostna naloga v okoljski politiki Evropske unije in držav članic;
Stresses that producing agrofuels from waste should not become a goal in itself; reducing waste should continue to be a priority in the environmental policy of the European Union and in that of Member States;
14. meni, da je nujno, da se trajnost in obseg obratov za pridobivanje bioplina in živinorejskih kmetij prilagodi posamezni regiji, da bi koristi za okolje prispevale tudi k boljšemu sprejemanju živinorejskih kmetij, ki se soočajo s številnimi težavami zaredi povečanega števila pritožb sosedov in javnosti;
Believes that, for biogas installations just as for animal holdings, sustainability and a size that is adapted to the particular region are essential if the environmental benefits are to also lead to greater acceptance of animal holdings, which encounter many problems due to an increased number of complaints from neighbours and the general public;
Sposobnost ekonomskega preživetja in sheme podpore
Economic viability and support schemes,
19. poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj pri bodočih predlogih glede ureditve sektorja za bioplin ne upoštevajo zgolj okoljskih vidikov, ampak tudi vplive na kakovostno in trajnostno pridelavo hrane;
Calls on the Member States and the Commission, when putting forward future proposals on regulation of the biogas sector, to examine not only the environmental aspects but also the impact on high-quality, sustainable food production;
21. ugotavlja, da je najustreznejša velikost obrata za pridobivanje bioplina odvisna od različnih okoliščin, ki določajo ekonomijo obsega, zato bi morala biti temeljito preučena; meni, da je predvsem potrebno, da se poleg ocene gospodarskega učinka in ravnotežja toplogrednih plinov oceni vpliv obsega obratov na okoliško pokrajino v smislu širjenja monokulture na račun določenih drugih kulturnih rastlin;
21.Notes that the optimal size of a biogas plant depends on various circumstances determining the economics of scale, that should be thoroughly studied; considers that, in addition to an economic assessment and the greenhouse gas balance, it is above all necessary to assess the impact of the size of the plant on the surrounding landscape with regard to expansion of monoculture in respect of certain crops;
23. meni, da mladi in inovativni sektor za bioplin sicer potrebuje začetno spodbudo, da pa bi se morali ti spodbujevalni sistemi končati, ko bo tržno donosen; zato poziva k razmisleku o enotnem podpornem instrumentu EU po zgledu nemškega zakona o obnovljivih virih energije;
Considers that, whilst the young and innovative biogas sector needs start-up support, such support schemes should only last until the sector has become commercially viable; calls, therefore, for a uniform support instrument to be tested in the EU, along the lines of the German Renewable Energy Act;
25. poziva Komisijo, naj poroča, kako bi lahko merila za ekonomsko in okoljsko učinkovitost in trajnost vključili v področje energetskih rastlin, s čimer bi ta razmeroma nova tehnika postala bolj okolju prijazna, pa tudi proizvodnja hrane in oskrbe z njo bi bila ustrezno obravnavana,
Asks the Commission to report on how criteria on economic and environmental efficiency and sustainability can be introduced for energy crops, which would lead to this relatively new technique becoming more environmentally friendly, and which would ensure that the concerns relating to food production and supply are properly addressed,
28. opozarja države članice in Komisijo, da nadaljnji napredek na področju bioplina ni mogoč brez dodatnega financiranja; opozarja, da mora biti financiranje usmerjeno v raziskave in razvoj, prenos rezultatov posebnih projektov v obrate in v večjo podporo "zeleni električni energiji" in "zelenemu plinu";
Reminds Member States and the Commission that further advancement of biogas is not possible without additional funding; recalls that funding needs to be provided for research and development, for the promotion of results from specific projects, for installations and for the increased support of 'green electricity' and 'green gas';
32. s tem v zvezi poudarja, da mora dovajanje električne energije , toplote in zemeljskega plina v omrežje potekati nediskriminatorno, in poziva, naj bo bioplin izenačen z zemeljskim plinom, da bo lahko po dovajanju v omrežje zemeljskega plina polnovredno izkoriščen;
Stresses in this regard that the supply of electricity, heat and natural gas to networks must be non-discriminatory, and calls for biogas to be treated in the same way as natural gas to enable it to achieve its full potential once it has been introduced into the natural gas network;
36. opozarja na glavne razlike pri dolžini in vsebini nacionalnih postopkov za odobritev obratov za pridobivanje bioplina in poziva države članice, naj preprečijo, da bi zahteve na nacionalni ravni pri regionalnem načrtovanju in podeljevanju licenc in odobritev predstavljale oviro;
Draws attention to the major differences in terms of length and content that exist between national approval procedures for biogas installations, and calls on the Member States to prevent national requirements in the area of regional planning and the granting of licences and approvals from forming an unnecessary hindrance;
Potreba po reviziji v zakonodaji EU
The need for review in EU-legislation
a) posebne cilje za prednostno uporabo gnoja, na primer v obliki deleža presnovljenega živinskega gnoja in upoštevajoč kmetijske pogoje in razmere v državah članicah,
a) Specific targets for the priority use of manure, for instance in the form of the share of the livestock manure that is digested, and taking into account the agricultural conditions and the situation in the Member States,
b) letno statistiko in poročila o proizvodnji bioplina iz kmetijskih ostankov, da bi lahko sledili uresničevanju ciljev,
b) Annual statistics and reports on agricultural biogas production in order to be able to follow up on the targets,
c) ukrepe za izgradnjo in spodbujanje obratov za pridobivanje bioplina na podlagi nacionalne in regionalne presoje vpliva, s spodbujanjem takšnih obratov, ki na nacionalni in regionalni ravni najbolj koristijo okolju in jih v ekonomskem smislu lahko imenujemo trajnostne; v vse načrte morajo biti vključeni ukrepi za širjenje in spodbujanje rezultatov, pridobljenih iz prejšnjih izkušenj ali demonstracijskih projektov; če ureditev glede regionalnega razvoja in razvoja podeželja ne dopušča financiranja takšnih ukrepov, je treba ureditev spremeniti,
c) Measures for the construction and promotion of biogas-installations based on a national or regional impact assessment, promoting those installations that, nationally and/or regionally, are most beneficial to the environment and which are economically sustainable; measures for the dissemination and promotion of results gained from prior experiences or demonstration projects need to be included in all plans; if regional and rural development regulations do not allow funding of such measures, they must be amended,
42. poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predstavi predlog za direktivo o bioloških odpadkih, vključno s standardi kakovosti; poziva Komisijo, naj razišče možnost za skupno direktivo o bioplinu in bioloških odpadkih;
Urges the Commission to present as soon as possible a proposal for a biowaste directive, which shall include quality standards; invites the Commission to explore the possibility for a joint biogas and biowaste directive;
49. zahteva od držav članic, ki v obstoječe nacionalne razvojne programe niso prenesle nobenih ukrepov ali so jih prenesle premalo, da bioplin vključijo v vmesno vrednotenje obstoječih programov za razvoj podeželja in regij ter predlagajo ukrepe za prihodnost;
Demands that Member States that have not incorporated any measures or have not incorporated sufficient measures in existing national development programmes ought to include biogas in their mid-term evaluation of existing rural and regional development programmes, and propose actions for the future;
51. poziva Komisijo naj najpozneje do 15. decembra 2008 Evropskemu parlamentu predstavi usklajeno poročilo o evropski proizvodnji bioplina in o prihodnjih obetih na tem področju, vključno z oceno vpliva, ter pri tem upošteva prej omenjene predloge in doseženi napredek;
Asks the Commission to present a coherent report on European biogas production and future prospects in this area, including an impact assessment, to the European Parliament by 15 December 2008 at the latest, taking into account the above-mentioned proposals and the progress made;
Okoljske in gospodarske prednosti bioplina
The environmental and economic advantages of biogas
V tem obdobju strme rasti cen nafte, vse višjih cen zemeljskega plina in precejšnje odvisnosti od uvoza energije vse več držav vzpostavlja spodbujevalno zakonodajo za ovrednotenje energetskega potenciala bioplina, ki je podoben zemeljskemu plinu in ga lahko nadomesti (bioplin vsebuje med 55 % in 65 % metana).
In this period of exploding oil prices, of increasing natural gas prices, and of considerable energy-import dependence more and more countries are setting up incentive legislations to valorise the energy potential of biogas, that resembles and can substitute natural gas (biogas contains between 55% and 65% methane).
Bioplin, ki se pridobiva v integriranih kmetijskih obratih, ima pomembno vlogo med bioenergetskimi viri in je vsestransko uporaben.
Biogas produced in integrated agricultural plants plays and important role among the bioenergy resources and can be used as a universal energy source.
Po doseženih vse manjših koncentracijah metana v bioplinu se lahko z njim ustvarja mehanska energija, preko nje pa električna (osvetljava stavb in živinorejskih poslopij); izgorevanje bioplina proizvaja toploto, ki se lahko uporablja za ogrevanje in sušenje (plastične zgradbe, rastlinjaki, silosi za žita, svinjaki, javne zgradbe).
After increasing methane-concentration purified biogas can be used to propel mechanical output, and through that electricity (lighting of buildings and animal husbandry sites); burning the biogas produces heat usable for heating and drying (plastic houses, greenhouses, corn, piggery heating, public facilities).
Bioplin se lahko uporablja tudi za pogon hladilnih naprav (hladilnikov) ali za gorivne celice.
Biogas can also be used for fuelling cooling machines (refrigerators), or for fuel-cells.
Očiščen in stisnjen bioplin se lahko uporablja kot biogorivo za pogon cestnih vozil.
Upgraded and pressurized biogas can be used as biofuel suitable for running road vehicles.
Bioplin, ki se pridobi iz enega hektarja biomase, je dvakrat bolj učinkovit kot biodizel.
Biogas gathered from one hectare of biomass is twice as effective as biodiesel.
V EU danes obstaja približno 4.242 obratov za pridobivanje bioplina na ravni kmetijskih obratov in 26 centraliziranih obratov, vendar so med njimi glede na državo članico EU, v kateri se nahajajo, velike razlike.
Today there are some 4,242 farm-scale and around 26 centralized biogas plants in the EU, but with wide differences from one EU member state to another.