natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To se bo nekoliko spremenilo, če in ko bo začela veljati lizbonska pogodba.
If and when the Lisbon Treaty comes into effect this may change a little.
Ob tem pa se zdi razumno, da z drugimi institucijami začnemo podrobneje pretehtavati, kako lahko odbor (in s tem Parlament) uveljavi več dejanskih pooblastil, na primer v zvezi s postopkom za ugotavljanje kršitev iz členov 226 in 228 Pogodbe, ki dajejo Komisiji precejšnja diskrecijska pooblastila, Parlamentu pa nobenih.
However, it does seem sensible at this conjuncture to begin to consider in more detail with the other institutions, ways in which the Committee (and therefore the Parliament) can exert more real power regarding, for example the infringement procedure, under Articles 226 and 228 of the Treaty, which give considerable discretionary power to the Commission and none at all to the Parliament.
Poleg tega bi morala biti stališča odbora vplivnejša, kadar pride zadeva v teh postopkih pred Evropsko sodišče, saj odbor nima praktičnih sredstev, da bi po sedanjih določbah Sodišču posredoval utemeljeno mnenje – ali resolucije, ki jih je Parlament sprejel na podlagi njegovih ugotovitev –, zato je velik razkorak pri tem, katere dokaze želi Sodišče upoštevati pri svojih posvetovanjih.
Furthermore, the views of the Committee should be able to carry more impact when cases are brought before the European Court of Justice under these procedures because it does not have the practical means to communicate its considered opinions - or resolutions which Parliament has approved based upon its findings - to the Court under current provisions and this therefore leaves an important gap in evidence which the Court may choose to take into account in its deliberations.
Odbor bi moral zato moral podrobneje pretehtati, kako okrepiti svoja pooblastila.
The Committee should therefore begin to consider in more detail ways in which its real powers could be enhanced.
Treba bi bilo pregledati opustitvene tožbe, postopke za plačilo nadomestil vlagateljem peticij, katerih pravice so bile kršene zaradi slabega izvajanja zakonodajnih aktov EU, in opredeliti bolj specifična pravila, povezana z učinkovitim izvajanjem Listine o temeljnih pravicah, tako da bi lahko postopek obravnavanja peticij v naslednjem zakonodajnem obdobju resnično dozorel.
Injunction procedures, compensation procedures for petitioners whose rights have been affected by badly applied EU legislative acts, more specific rules related to the effective implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, should all be reviewed so that in the next legislature the petitions process might really come of age.
PRILOGA: Peticije, ki jih je Parlament prejel leta 2008
ANNEX: Petitions received by Parliament in 2008
Zadevna država
Concerned country
Državljanstvo prvotnega vlagatelja peticije
Prime petitioner nationality
Teme peticij
Petition themes
Jezik peticije
Petition Language
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare
Iles Braghetto , Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve
Iles Braghetto , Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
Bernadette Vergnaud , Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov
Bernadette Vergnaud , Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
(*) Pridruženi odbori – člen 47 poslovnika
(*) Associated committees – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI.....................................76
OPINION FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS.......78
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................86
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (*) .........88
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .......................143
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (*) 146
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ................................193
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ..........197
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ...........................209
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy .............214
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve .........................................................................236
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ....................................................242
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov .................................244
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality .250
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0414 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0414 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6–0257/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0257/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za pravne zadeve in Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6-0233/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0233/2009 ),
(2) Glede na to, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za izvajanje člena 95 Pogodbe kot pravne podlage, se zakonodajalec Skupnosti zanaša na to pravno podlago, tudi kadar je varovanje javnega zdravja odločilni dejavnik pri sprejetih odločitvah, pri čemer člen 95(3) Pogodbe izrecno zahteva, da je treba za dosego usklajevanja zagotoviti visoko raven varovanja zdravja ljudi, ob upoštevanju zlasti vsakršne spremembe na podlagi znanstvenih dejstev.
(2) Given that that the conditions for recourse to Article 95 of the Treaty as a legal basis are fulfilled, the Community legislature shall rely on this legal basis even when public health protection is a decisive factor in the choices made; in this respect Article 95(3) of the Treaty explicitly requires that , in achieving harmonisation, a high level of protection of human health should be guaranteed taking account in particular of any new development based on scientific facts.
(2) Glede na to, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za izvajanje člena 95 Pogodbe kot pravne podlage, se zakonodajalec Skupnosti zanaša na to pravno podlago, tudi kadar je varovanje javnega zdravja odločilni dejavnik pri sprejetih odločitvah, pri čemer člen 95(3) Pogodbe izrecno zahteva, da je treba zagotoviti visoko raven varovanja zdravja ljudi, ob upoštevanju zlasti vsakršne spremembe na podlagi znanstvenih dejstev.
(2) Given that that the conditions for recourse to Article 95 of the Treaty as a legal basis are fulfilled, the Community legislature shall rely on this legal basis even when public health protection is a decisive factor in the choices made; in this respect Article 95(3) of the Treaty explicitly requires that a high level of protection of human health should be guaranteed taking account in particular of any new development based on scientific facts.
Namen te direktive je opredelitev pravic pacientov, ne pa usklajevanje organizacije zdravstva.
The aim of this directive should be to clarify patients' rights and not to harmonise the organisation of health care.
To je v izključni pristojnosti držav članic.
This is a matter for which Member States bear sole responsibility.
(2a) Evropski parlament je 9. junija 2005 s 554 glasovi za in 12 proti sprejel resolucijo o mobilnosti pacientov in razvoju zdravstvenega varstva v Evropski uniji 1 , v kateri poziva k pravni varnosti in jasnosti o pravicah in postopkih za paciente, zdravstvene delavce in države članice.
( 2a ) Th e European Parliament adopted on 9 June 2005 , by 554 votes to 12, a resolution on p atient m obility and h ealthcare d evelopments in the European Union 1 , in which it called for legal certainty and clarity on rights and procedures for patients, health professionals and Member States.
1 UL C 124 E, 25.5.2006, str.
1 OJ C 124 E, 25.5.2006, p.
(4) Zdravstveni sistemi Skupnosti so osrednji sestavni del visoke ravni socialne zaščite v Evropi ter prispevajo k socialni koheziji in socialni pravičnosti, pa tudi k trajnostnemu razvoju.
(4) The health systems of the Community are a central component of Europe’s high levels of social protection, and contribute to social cohesion and social justice as well as to sustainable development.
Prav tako so del širšega okvira storitev splošnega interesa.
They are also part of the wider framework of services of general interest.
(5a) Ta direktiva spoštuje svobodno izbiro vsake države članice, da se odloči za po njenem mnenju primerno obliko zdravstvenega varstva, ter v to odločitev ne posega.
(5a) This Directive respects and does not prejudice the freedom of each Member State to decide what type of healthcare it considers appropriate.
Nobena določba te direktive se ne sme razlagati tako, da bi ogrožala temeljne etične odločitve držav članic.
No provision of this Directive should be interpreted in such a way as to undermine the fundamental ethical choices of Member States.
Pojavila se je zaskrbljenost, da bodo države članice morda morale financirati etično sporne medicinske „storitve“, kot so evtanazija, testiranje DNK ali umetne oploditve, čeprav zadevna storitev v zadevni državi članici ni dovoljena oziroma se vsaj ne financira.
Concerns have been raised that ethically controversial medical "services" like euthanasia, DNA-testing or IVF maybe have to be financed by the Member States even if the relevant service is not allowed, or at least not financed, in the relevant Member States.
Glede storitev, ki so očitno nezakonite, kot je evtanazija, ni dvoma, vendar bi morda pomagalo, da se to vprašanje pojasni.
For services which are clearly illegal, like euthanasia, there should be no doubt, but it may be helpful to clarify this point.
Na drugih področjih, kot je testiranje DNK, je stanje bolj zapleteno, saj ga nobena država članica ne prepoveduje, imajo pa glede tega nekoliko različne pogoje, v eni državi članici je na primer svetovanje pred testiranjem obvezno, v drugi pa ne.
In other areas, like DNA-testing, the situation is more complicated because it is not banned in any Member State but the conditions are quite different, for example obligation to do counselling before testing is necessary in one Member State and not in the other.
(6) Sodišče je že obravnavalo nekatera vprašanja v zvezi s čezmejnim zdravstvenim varstvom, zlasti glede povračila stroškov za zdravstveno varstvo v državi članici, razen tisti, v kateri ima prejemnik oskrbe stalno prebivališče.
(6) Some issues related to cross-border healthcare, in particular reimbursement of healthcare provided in a Member State other than that in which the recipient of the care is resident, have been already addressed by the Court of Justice.
Zdravstveno varstvo je bilo izključeno iz področja uporabe Direktive 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na notranjem trgu, zato je pomembno ta vprašanja obravnavati v okviru posebnega pravnega instrumenta Skupnosti, da se doseže splošnejša in učinkovitejša uporaba načel, ki jih je Sodišče določilo na podlagi posameznih primerov.
As healthcare was excluded from the scope of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market it is important to address these issues in a specific Community legal instrument in order to achieve a more general and effective application of principles developed by the Court of Justice on a case by case basis.
T a vprašanja je treba obravnavati v okviru posebnega pravnega instrumenta Skupnosti, da se doseže splošnejša in učinkovitejša uporaba načel, ki jih je Sodišče določilo na podlagi posameznih primerov.
It is important to address these issues in a specific Community legal instrument in order to achieve a more general and effective application of principles developed by the Court of Justice on a case by case basis.
(8) Cilj te direktive je vzpostaviti splošni okvir za izvajanje varnega, visoko kakovostnega in učinkovitega čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v Skupnosti ter zagotavljanje mobilnosti pacientov in pravice opravljanja zdravstvenega varstva in visoke ravni varovanja zdravja, ob popolnem upoštevanju pristojnosti držav članic pri opredeljevanju koristi socialne varnosti v zvezi z zdravjem ter organizaciji in izvajanju zdravstvenega varstva in zdravniške oskrbe ter ugodnosti socialne varnosti zlasti v primeru bolezni.
(8) This directive aims to establish a general framework for provision of safe, high quality and efficient cross-border healthcare in the Community and to ensure patients mobility and freedom to provide healthcare and high level of protection of health, whilst fully respecting the responsibilities of the Member States for the definition of social security benefits related to health and the organisation and delivery of healthcare and medical care and social security benefits in particular for sickness.
(8) Cilj te direktive je vzpostaviti splošni okvir za izvajanje varnega, visokokakovostnega in učinkovitega čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v Skupnosti glede mobilnosti pacientov , pa tudi visoke ravni varovanja zdravja, ob popolnem upoštevanju pristojnosti držav članic pri opredeljevanju koristi socialne varnosti v zvezi z zdravjem ter pri organizaciji in izvajanju zdravstvenega varstva in zdravniške oskrbe , pa tudi ugodnosti socialne varnosti , zlasti v primeru bolezni.
(8) This Directive aims to establish a general framework for provision of safe, high quality and efficient cross-border healthcare in the Community in relation to patients mobility as well as a to a high level of protection of health, whilst fully respecting the responsibilities of the Member States for the definition of social security benefits related to health and for the organisation and delivery of healthcare and medical care as well as of social security benefits in particular for sickness.
Predlagana direktiva velja samo za mobilnost pacientov in ne za prosti pretok izvajalcev storitev.
The proposed Directive applies only to patient mobility and not to free movement of providers of services.
(9) Ta direktiva o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva se uporablja za vse vrste zdravstvenega varstva.
(9) This Directive on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare applies to all types of healthcare.
Kot je potrdilo Sodišče, iz obsega temeljnega načela prostega pretoka niso izvzete niti zaradi svoje posebne narave niti zaradi načina organizacije ali financiranja.
As confirmed by the Court of Justice, neither their special nature nor the way in which they are organised or financed removes them from the ambit of the fundamental principle of freedom of movement.
V zvezi z dolgoročno oskrbo se direktiva ne uporablja za pomoč in podporo za družine ali posameznike, ki so v daljšem časovnem obdobju še posebno potrebni pomoči .
As regards long-term care, the Directive does not apply to assistance and support for families or individuals who are, over an extended period of time, in a particular state of need.
N e uporablja se na primer za stanovanjske domove ali nastanitve ali pomoč starejšim osebam ali otrokom s strani socialnih delavcev ali prostovoljnih negovalcev ali strokovnjakov, ki niso zdravstveni delavci.
It does not apply, for example, to residential homes or housing, or assistance provided to elderly people or children by social workers or volunteer carers or professionals other than health professionals.
V zvezi z dolgoročno oskrbo se direktiva ne uporablja za pomoč in podporo za družine ali posameznike, ki so v daljšem časovnem obdobju še posebno potrebni medicinske oskrbe, podpore in nege, kolikor to vključuje posebno strokovno zdravljenje ali pomoč s strani sistema zdravstvene varnosti .
As regards long-term care, the Directive does not apply to assistance and support for families or individuals who are, over an extended period of time, in particular need of nursing, support or care in so far as this involves specific expert treatment or help provided by a social security system.
To se nanaša predvsem na dolgotrajno oskrbo, ki je potrebna, da bi osebi, ki jo potrebuje, omogočila kar se da polno in neodvisno življenje.
This covers above all such long ‑term care services as are considered necessary in order to provide the person in need of care with as full and independent a life as possible.
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja na primer za stanovanjske domove ali nastanitve ali pomoč starejšim osebam ali otrokom s strani socialnih delavcev ali prostovoljnih negovalcev ali strokovnjakov, ki niso zdravstveni delavci.
This Directive does not apply, for example, to residential homes or housing, or assistance provided to elderly people or children by social workers or volunteer carers or professionals other than health professionals.
Namen tega predloga spremembe je pojasniti dejstvo, da so storitve na področju socialnega varstva ali oskrbe, rehabilitacija za vrnitev na delo in dolgoročna oskrba izključene iz področja uporabe te direktive.
This amendment serves to clarify the fact that services in the area of social assistance or care, rehabilitation with a view to resuming work and long-term care are excluded from the scope of this directive.
(9a) Ta direktiva se ne uporablja za presaditve organov.
(9a) This Directive does not apply to organ transplantations.
Zaradi posebne bo to področje urejeno s posebno direktivo.
Due to their specific nature, they will be regulated by a separate directive.
(10) Za namene te direktive pojem „čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo“ zajema naslednje oblike storitev zdravstvenega varstva :
(10) For the purpose of this Directive, the concept of "cross-border healthcare" covers the following modes of supply of healthcare:
Za namene te direktive zajema pojem „čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo“ samo uporabo zdravstvenega varstva v državi članici, ki ni država članica pacientovega zavarovanja.
(10) For the purpose of this Directive, the concept of "cross-border healthcare" only covers the use of healthcare in a Member State other than that where the patient is an insured person.
To je znano tudi kot „mobilnost pacientov“;
This is what is referred to as 'patient mobility' ;
– uporaba zdravstvenega varstva v tujini (tj. pacient gre na zdravljenje k izvajalcu zdravstvenega varstva v drugi državi članici); to je znano tudi kot „mobilnost pacientov“;
– Use of healthcare abroad (i.e.: a patient moving to a healthcare provider in another Member State for treatment); this is what is referred to as 'patient mobility';
– čezmejno zagotavljanje zdravstvenega varstva (tj. prenos storitve iz ozemlja ene države članice na ozemlje druge); kot so na primer storitve telemedicine, diagnosticiranje in zdravniški recept na daljavo, laboratorijske storitve;
– Cross-border provision of healthcare (i.e.: delivery of service from the territory of one Member State into the territory of another); such as telemedicine services, remote diagnosis and prescription, laboratory services;
– trajna prisotnost izvajalca zdravstvenega varstva (tj. ustanovitev izvajalca zdravstvenega varstva v drugi državi članici) in
– Permanent presence of a healthcare provider (i.e.: establishment of a healthcare provider in another Member State); and
– začasna prisotnost oseb (tj. mobilnost zdravstvenih delavcev, na primer začasen premik v državo članico pacienta zaradi izvajanja storitev).
– Temporary presence of persons (i.e.: mobility of health professionals, for example moving temporarily to the Member State of the patient to provide services).
(11) Kot so države članice navedle v sklepih Sveta o skupnih vrednotah in načelih zdravstvenih sistemov Evropske unije, obstaja sklop operativnih načel, ki so skupna zdravstvenim sistemom po vsej Skupnosti.
(11) As recognised by the Member States in the Council Conclusions on Common values and principles in European Union Health Systems there is a set of operating principles that are shared by health systems throughout the Community.
Ta operativna načela vključujejo kakovost, varnost, oskrbo, ki temelji na dokazih in etiki, vključevanje pacientov, pravna sredstva, temeljno pravico do zasebnosti pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov ter zaupnost.
These operating principles include quality, safety, care that is based on evidence and ethics, patient involvement, redress, the fundamental right to privacy with respect to the processing of personal data, and confidentiality.
Pacienti, strokovni delavci in organi, pristojni za zdravstvene sisteme, se morajo zanašati na to, da se bodo po vsej Skupnosti upoštevala ta skupna načela in zagotovile strukture za njihovo izvajanje.
Patients, professionals and authorities responsible for health systems must be able to rely on these shared principles being respected and structures provided for their implementation throughout the Community.
Zato je primerno določiti, da so organi države članice, na ozemlju katere se zdravstveno varstvo izvaja, pristojni za zagotavljaje skladnosti z navedenimi operativnimi načeli.
It is therefore appropriate to require that it is the authorities of the Member State on whose territory the healthcare is provided, who are responsible for ensuring compliance with those operating principles.
To je nujno za zagotavljanje zaupanja pacientov v čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo, ki pa je nujno za doseganje mobilnosti pacientov in prostega pretoka izvajanja zdravstvenega varstva na notranjem trgu in visoke ravni varovanja zdravja.
This is necessary to ensure the confidence of patients in cross-border healthcare, which is itself necessary for achieving patients' mobility and free movement of provision of healthcare in the internal market as well as a high level of health protection.
To je nujno za zagotavljanje zaupanja pacientov v čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo, ki pa je nujno za doseganje mobilnosti pacientov in visoke ravni varovanja zdravja.
This is necessary to ensure the confidence of patients in cross-border healthcare, which is itself necessary for achieving patients' mobility as well as a high level of health protection.
Glede na te skupne vrednote pa vendarle velja, da se države članice iz etičnih razlogov različno odločajo glede dostopnosti nekaterih načinov zdravljenja in dejanskih pogojev za dostop.
In view of these common values it is nevertheless accepted that Member States take different decisions on ethical grounds as regards the availability of certain treatments and the concrete access conditions.
Ta direktiva ne posega v etično raznolikost.
This Directive is without prejudice to ethical diversity.
(12) Glede na to, da je nemogoče vnaprej vedeti, ali bo določen izvajalec zdravstvenega varstva opravil zdravstvene storitve za pacienta iz druge države članice ali pacienta iz lastne države članice, je nujno, da se zahteve za zagotovitev opravljanja zdravstvenega varstva v skladu s skupnimi načeli in jasnimi standardi kakovosti in varnosti uporabljajo za vse vrste zdravstvenega varstva, da se zagotovi pravica opravljanja in prejemanja čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva, kar je cilj direktive.
(12) Given that it is impossible to know in advance whether a given healthcare provider will supply healthcare to a patient coming from another Member State or a patient from their own Member State, it is necessary that the requirements to ensure that healthcare is provided according to common principles and clear quality and safety standards are applicable to all type of healthcare in order to ensure the freedom to provide and obtain cross border healthcare which is the aim of the directive.