natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Drugi dejavniki
Other considerations
Evropska unija bi morala sprejeti vse ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da bo pakistanska vlada ratificirala Mednarodni pakt o državljanskih in političnih pravicah iz leta 1966 in Konvencijo OZN proti mučenju in drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali poniževalnim kaznim ali ravnanju iz leta 1984.
The European Union should take all due action in order to secure that the government of Pakistan ratifies the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the 1984 UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
v skladu s členom 52(3) poslovnika, ki ga vlagajo
pursuant to Rule 52(3) of the Rules of Procedure by
Sylvie Guillaume v imenu skupine S&D,
Sylvie Guillaume on behalf of the S&D Group,
Hélène Flautre, Franziska Keller, Jean Lambert in Judith Sargentini v imenu skupine Greens/EFA ter
Hélène Flautre, Franziska Keller, Jean Lambert et Judith Sargentini on behalf of the Greens/EFA
Rui Tavarès, Cornelia Ernst in Marie-Christine Vergiat v imenu skupine GUE/NGL
Rui Tavarès, Cornelia Ernst et Marie-Christine Vergiat on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
Sporazum o ponovnem sprejemu med EU in Pakistanom je prvi, ki se sklepa v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo.
The EU-Pakistan readmission agreement is the first to be concluded under the Lisbon Treaty.
Torej mora Evropski parlament zagotoviti, da je v celoti skladen s pogodbami EU ter z evropskim in mednarodnim pravom o temeljnih pravicah in azilu.
Therefore, the European Parliament must ensure that it fully complies with EU Treaties, European and international law concerning fundamental rights and asylum.
Glasovali smo proti temu sporazumu, ker:
We voted against the present agreement because:
– je njegov cilj vračanje ljudi v državo, ki ne spoštuje pomembnih standardov v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami, ki ni podpisnica ženevske konvencije iz leta 1951 in v kateri sedanje razmere ne omogočajo varne vrnitve.
- it aims at returning people to a country which does not comply with relevant human rights standards, which has not signed the 1951 Geneva Convention and where the current situation does not allow a safe return.
Nadalje ima Pakistan že sedaj težave pri sprejemu velikega števila razseljenih oseb;
Furthermore, Pakistan has already troubles in welcoming a huge number of displaced people.
– ne vključuje strogih varoval in mehanizmov v zvezi s kršitvijo temeljnih pravic;
- it does not include strict safeguards and mechanisms concerning the violation of fundamental rights.
– vsebuje številne vrzeli in dvoumnosti, zlasti v zvezi z opredelitvami, potovalnimi dokumenti, rokom za odgovor na zahteve za ponovni sprejem, tranzitom, dokaznim bremenom in možnostjo retroaktivnosti.
- it contains numerous loopholes and ambiguities, particularly regarding definitions, travel documents, deadline for answering to requests for readmission, transit operations, the burden of proof and the possible retroactivity.
Te dvoumnosti bo morda pojasnil Skupni odbor za ponovni sprejem, v katerem Evropski parlament žal nima besede, kar bi bilo glede na njegove nove pristojnosti popolnoma legitimno;
These ambiguities might be clarified in the Joint Readmission Committee in which the EP has regrettably no say, which would be totally legitimate regarding its new competences
– ne zagotavlja ustrezne zaščite osebnih podatkov: podatki se lahko posredujejo „drugim organom“ brez dovoljenja osebe, ki jo podatki zadevajo;
- it doesn't guarantee adequately the protection of personal data: data can be forwarded to "other bodies", without requiring person's consent.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o podpisu Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation
Po osmih letih pogajanj med Evropsko komisijo in Pakistanom je bil končno dosežen sporazum o postopku za ponovni sprejem oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja, dogovorjeno besedilo sporazuma pa je bilo s pridržkom poznejše sklenitve sporazuma podpisano oktobra 2009.
After 8 years of negotiations between the European Commission and Pakistan, agreement was finally reached on a re-admission procedure for persons residing without authorization, and the agreed text was signed in October 2009, subject to its conclusion.
Pristojni odbor je Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (LIBE), Odbor za zunanje zadeve (AFET) pa je zaradi svojega dolgotrajnega zanimanja za Pakistan zaprosil za odobritev priprave mnenja.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) is the lead committee and, given the long-standing interest in Pakistan of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, AFET requested authorisation to draft an opinion.
Predlagani sklep o sklenitvi sporazuma določa potrebne notranje dogovore za praktično uporabo sporazuma.
The proposed decision concerning the conclusion of the agreement sets out the necessary internal arrangements for the practical application of the Agreement.
V obrazložitvenem memorandumu, ki je priložen predlogu, Komisija poudarja, da morajo biti obveznosti glede ponovnega sprejema v celoti vzajemne in zajemati lastne državljane, državljane tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva.
In the Explanatory Memorandum attached to the proposal, the Commission points out that the readmission obligations are drawn up in a fully reciprocal way, comprising own nationals as well as third-country nationals and stateless persons.
Dogovorjeno je bilo odstopanje od sklepa za Dansko in nedavno še za Irsko.
A derogation for Denmark and, latterly, Ireland, from the decision, has been agreed.
V izvirnem osnutku mnenja so bile poudarjene negotove notranje razmere in nenehno kršenje človekovih pravic v Pakistanu ter dejstvo, da Komisija v pogajanjih ne skuša zagotoviti spoštovanja pravic in varnosti vrnjenih oseb (tako Pakistancev in državljanov tretjih držav kot tudi oseb brez državljanstva v tranzitu v končno namembno državo), kar v kontekstu obveznega ponovnega sprejema v Pakistan še zdaleč ni spodbudno, Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve pa je bil kot pristojni odbor pozvan, naj predlog zavrne.
The original draft opinion had called on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to reject the proposal, pointing to the unstable internal situation and the persistent pattern of human rights violations in Pakistan, the absence by the Commission in its negotiations of attempts to ensure that the rights and safety of returnees (both Pakistanis and third country or stateless persons in transit to the final state of destination) would be respected, as hardly reassuring in the context of compulsory readmissions to Pakistan.
Zaradi zaskrbljenosti glede spoštovanja človekovih pravic navaja kot zaskrbljujoče tudi dejstvo, da enajst že veljavnih sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu še ni bilo ocenjenih.
Also cited as disturbing was the fact that no evaluation has yet been made of the 11 re-admission agreements already in forced, particularly in the light of concerns about respect for human rights.
Člani odbora so se strinjali, da res obstajajo znatni razlogi za zaskrbljenost, vendar so se odločili, da je bolje imeti jasen okvir za sodelovanje pri ponovnem sprejemu v Pakistan kot pa tvegati, da bodo države članice nezakonite priseljence vračale na ad hoc podlagi, ne da bi EU lahko nadzorovala spoštovanje človekovih pravic vrnjenih oseb, bodisi pakistanskega porekla, državljanov tretjih držav ali oseb brez državljanstva v tranzitu skozi Pakistan.
Members agreed that these were indeed significant concerns but decided that a clear framework for co-operation on readmission with Pakistan was preferable to a situation where there is a risk that Member States proceed to return illegal immigrants on an ad hoc basis and without EU supervision regarding respect for the human rights of returnees, whether of Pakistani origin or third country or stateless people in transit through Pakistan.
Člen 16 sporazuma o ponovnem sprejemu bi zagotovil, da se bo mnenje EU pri tem upoštevalo.
Article 16 of the Readmission agreement would ensure that the EU had a say in this respect.
Odbor je ponovno zahteval oceno sporazumov, ki jih je EU sklenila do zdaj, vendar je menil, da ti splošni pomisleki ne smejo voditi k zavrnitvi tega sporazuma.
The Committee reiterated the need for an evaluation of the agreements concluded thus far by the EU but took the view that these general considerations should not lead to the rejection of this particular agreement.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, naj Parlamentu predlaga odobritev sporazuma.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament give its consent.
Gabriele Albertini, Sir Robert Atkins, Michael Gahler, Marietta Gianaku (Marietta Giannakou), Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadzigeorgiu (Takis Hadjigeorgiou), Ioanis Kasulidis (Ioannis Kasoulides), Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Kopa (Maria Eleni Koppa), Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Eduard Kukan, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Barry Madlener, Mario Mauro, Willy Meyer, Francisco José Millán Mon, Alexander Mirsky, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols, Kristiina Ojuland, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Alojz Peterle, Mirosław Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, Cristian Dan Preda, Fiorello Provera, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Ernst Strasser, Charles Tannock, Zoran Thaler, Inese Vaidere, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala
Gabriele Albertini, Sir Robert Atkins, Michael Gahler, Marietta Giannakou, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Ioannis Kasoulides, Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Eduard Kukan, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Barry Madlener, Mario Mauro, Willy Meyer, Francisco José Millán Mon, Alexander Mirsky, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols, Kristiina Ojuland, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Alojz Peterle, Mirosław Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, Cristian Dan Preda, Fiorello Provera, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Ernst Strasser, Charles Tannock, Zoran Thaler, Inese Vaidere, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala
Elena Băsescu, Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), Hélène Flautre, Kinga Gál, Roberto Gualtieri, Judith Sargentini, György Schöpflin, Alf Svensson, Renate Weber
Elena Băsescu, Nikolaos Chountis, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Gál, Roberto Gualtieri, Judith Sargentini, György Schöpflin, Alf Svensson, Renate Weber
Roberta Angelilli, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Gál, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, baronica Sarah Ludford (Baroness Sarah Ludford), Monica Luisa Macovei, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Louis Michel, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Carmen Romero López, Judith Sargentini, Csaba Sógor, Renate Sommer, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber
Roberta Angelilli, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Gál, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Monica Luisa Macovei, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Louis Michel, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolaou, Carmen Romero López, Judith Sargentini, Csaba Sógor, Renate Sommer, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber
Alexander Alvaro, Edit Bauer, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Monika Hohlmeier, Ilijana Malinova Jotova (Iliana Malinova Iotova), Franziska Keller, Jean Lambert, Petru Constantin Luhan, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Marie-Christine Vergiat, Cecilia Wikström
Alexander Alvaro, Edit Bauer, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Monika Hohlmeier, Iliana Malinova Iotova, Franziska Keller, Jean Lambert, Petru Constantin Luhan, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Mariya Nedelcheva, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Cecilia Wikström
– ob upoštevanju osnutka Sveta (09109/2010),
– having regard to the Council draft (09109/2010),
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2009)0370 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2009)0370 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 20. januarja 2010
– having regard to its position of 20 January 2010
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0002 . ,
Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0002 . ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 349 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim se je Svet ponovno posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7–0106/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council again consulted Parliament ( C7‑0106/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 55 in 59(3) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 55 and 59(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7‑0232/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7‑0232/2010 ),
Če je Svet začel notranji postopek za odločitev o morebitnem preklicu prenosa pooblastila, si o tem prizadeva obvestiti Komisijo v razumnem roku pred sprejetjem končne odločitve, pri tem pa navede preneseno pooblastilo, ki bi se lahko preklicalo, in možne razloge za preklic.
Where the Council has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of powers, it shall endeavour to inform the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated powers which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation.
Če je Svet začel notranji postopek za odločitev o morebitnem preklicu prenosa pooblastila, si o tem prizadeva obvestiti Evropski parlament in Komisijo v razumnem roku pred sprejetjem končne odločitve, pri tem pa navede preneseno pooblastilo, ki bi se lahko preklicalo, in možne razloge za preklic.
Where the Council has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of powers, it shall endeavour to inform the European Parliament and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated powers which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation.
Člen 6 c – odstavek 1
Article 6c – paragraph 1
Svet lahko nasprotuje delegiranim aktom v treh mesecih od datuma uradnega obvestila.
The Council may object to the delegated acts within a period of three months from the date of notification.
Če jim namerava nasprotovati, si prizadeva, da o tem v razumnem času pred sprejetjem končne odločitve obvesti Evropski parlament, pri tem pa navede, kateremu delegiranemu aktu namerava nasprotovati in razloge za nasprotovanje.
If it intends to object, the Council shall endeavour to inform the European Parliament within a reasonable time before it takes the final decision, indicating the delegated act to which it intends to object and the possible reasons for its objection.
Pete spremembe, ki jo je Parlament predlagal v prvotnem poročilu, sprejetem 20. januarja 2010, Evropska komisija ni ohranila, saj naj bi širila seznam blaga, na katerega se nanaša začasna opustitev, s čimer se spreminja tako prvotni predlog kot prvotna zahteva portugalske vlade.
The Fifth amendment proposed in Parliament's initial report adopted on 20 January 2010, was not retained by the European Commission as it purported to extend the list of goods covered b y this temporary suspension thus altering both the initial proposal and the initial request formulated by the Portuguese government.
Komisija je zato Svetu januarja 2010 predložila svoj prvotni nespremenjeni predlog.
Therefore, the Commission seized Council of its original unmodified proposal in January 2010.
Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije je začela veljati 1. decembra 2009.
The Treaty on TFEU entered into force on 1 December 2009.
Svet je zaradi tega moral predlog spremeniti tako, da je določbe o postopku komitologije zamenjal z novimi določbami o prenesenih pooblastilih.
Consequently the Council was obliged to on the one hand amend the proposal by replacing the provisions dealing with the comitology procedure with new provisions dealing with delegated powers.
V skladu z nasveti številnih služb Parlamenta in da bi se razjasnil pravni položaj podeljevanja in preklica prenesenih pooblastil v posebnem zakonodajnem postopku, kot je ta postopek, je predsedujoči zahteval mnenje pravne službe Parlamenta.
On the advice of a number of Parliament's services, and in order to clarify the legal situation concerning the granting and revocation of delegated powers under a special legislative procedure' as in this case, the Chair requested Parliament's Legal Service for its opinion.
Mnenje je prejel in zdaj je jasno, da je treba nekatere določbe, ki jih je v besedilo vstavil Svet, spremeniti tako, da bo Parlament zagotovo obveščen o vseh spremembah Sveta v zvezi s statusom delegiranih aktov.
This has now been received and it is now clear that the relevant provisions inserted into the text by Council require amending so as to ensure Parliament is informed of any changes Council makes to the Status of the delegated acts.
Glede na povedano, poročevalka predlaga, da se predlog Komisije sprejme, kakor je bil spremenjen.
In view of the above, your rapporteur proposes that the Commission proposal be adopted as amended.
o vlogi minimalnega dohodka v boju proti revščini in spodbujanju vključujoče družbe v Evropi
on the role of minimum income in combating poverty and promoting an inclusive society in Europe
– ob upoštevanju členov 4, 9, 14, 19, 151 in 153 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 4, 9, 14, 19, 151 and 153 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o odpravi vseh oblik diskriminacije žensk, sprejete leta 1979,
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) adopted in 1979,
– ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah iz leta 1948, ponovno potrjene na Svetovni konferenci ZN o človekovih pravicah leta 1993, zlasti njenih členov 3, 16, 18, 23, 25, 26, 27 in 29,
– having regard to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, reconfirmed during the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights, in particular Articles 3, 16, 18, 23, 25, 26, 27 and 29,
– ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta Združenih narodov o ekonomskih, socialnih in kulturnih pravicah iz leta 1966,
– having regard to the 1966 United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,
– ob upoštevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja Združenih narodov iz leta 2000, zlasti zmanjševanja skrajne revščine in lakote (prvi cilj), zagotavljanja splošne osnovnošolske izobrazbe (drugi cilj) in enakih možnosti za oba spola (tretji cilj),
– having regard to the Millennium Development Goals defined by the United Nations in 2000, in particular to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger (Goal 1), achieve universal primary education (Goal 2) and promote gender equality (Goal 3),
– ob upoštevanju konvencij št. 26 in 131 Mednarodne organizacije dela (MOD) o določitvi minimalnih osebnih dohodkov ter št. 29 in 105 o odpravi prisilnega dela,
– having regard to International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions Nos 26 and 131 on minimum wage fixing and Nos 29 and 105 on the abolishment of forced labour,
– ob upoštevanju globalnega pakta o zaposlovanju Mednarodne organizacije dela,
– having regard to the ILO Global Jobs Pact,
– ob upoštevanju agend Združenih narodov in MOD za dostojno delo,
– having regard to the Decent Work Agendas of the United Nations and ILO,
– ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti njenih določb o socialnih pravicah
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular its provisions on social rights
UL C 364, 18.12.2000. ,
OJ C 364, 18.12.2000. ,
– ob upoštevanju členov 34, 35 in 36 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, ki opredeljujejo zlasti pravico do socialne pomoči in pomoči pri pridobitvi stanovanj, visoko raven varovanja zdravja ljudi in dostop do gospodarskih storitev splošnega pomena
– having regard to Articles 34, 35 and 36 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which specifically define the right to social and housing assistance, a high level of human health protection and access to services of general economic interest
– ob upoštevanju poročila Mednarodne organizacije dela „Svetovno zavezništvo proti prisilnemu delu.
– having regard to the ILO report 'A global alliance against forced labour.
Svetovno poročilo v skladu z deklaracijo Mednarodne organizacije dela o temeljnih načelih in pravicah pri delu.
Global report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.
Poročilo generalnega direktorja, 2005“,
Report of the Director-General, 2005',
– ob upoštevanju Priporočila Sveta 92/441/EGS z dne 24. junija 1992 o skupnih merilih v zvezi z zadostnimi sredstvi in socialno pomočjo v sistemih socialnega varstva (priporočilo o minimalnem dohodku)
– having regard to Council Recommendation 92/441/EEC of 24 June 1992 on common criteria concerning sufficient resources and social assistance in social protection systems (Recommendation on minimum income)
– ob upoštevanju Priporočila Sveta 92/442/EGS z dne 27. julija 1992 o zbliževanju ciljev in politik socialnega varstva
– having regard to Council Recommendation 92/442/EEC of 27 July 1992 on the convergence of social protection objectives and policies
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta EPSCO, sprejetih na 2916. zasedanju 16. in 17. decembra 2008
– having regard to the conclusions of the EPSCO Council following the 2916th meeting on 16 and 17 December 2008
Svet Evropske unije, sporočilo za javnost, 16825/08 (Tisk 358), str.
Council of the European Union, Press Release 16825/08 (Presse 358), p.
UL C 9 E, 15.1.2010, str.
OJ C 9 E, 15.1.2010, p.
11. in poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter priloženega mnenja Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6‑0364/2008 )
11. and the corresponding report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (A6 0364/2008)
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. maja 2009 o prenovljeni socialni agendi
– having regard to its resolution of 6 May 2009 on the renewed social agenda
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0370 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0370 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 3. oktobra 2008 o njenem priporočilu o dejavnem vključevanju oseb, izključenih s trga dela, in svoje resolucije z dne 6. maja 2009 o dejavnem vključevanju oseb, izključenih s trga dela
– having regard to the Commission recommendation of 03.10.08 on the active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market and to its resolution of 6 May 2009 on the active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0371 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0371 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje pisne izjave št. 0111/2007 z dne 22. aprila 2008 o odpravi uličnega brezdomstva
– having regard to its Written Declaration No 0111/2007 of 22 April 2008 on ending street homelessness
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 3. marca 2010 z naslovom Evropa 2020: strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast
– having regard to the Commission communication of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020: a strategy for a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’