natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pri izvajanju pravice do demokratičnega nadzora izvedbenih ukrepov v okviru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje je Parlament nenehno poudarjal, da je najpomembnejši cilj Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 izkoreninjenje revščine in da morajo vsi ukrepi iz geografskih programov instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje izpolnjevati merila za uradno razvojno pomoč, ki jih je določil Odbor za razvojno pomoč Organizacije za ekonomsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD/DAC).
When exercising its right of democratic scrutiny over implementing measures under the Instrument for Development Cooperation (DCI), Parliament has consistently stressed that the primary objective of the Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 is the eradication of poverty and that all measures included in the DCI geographic programmes must fulfil the criteria for Official Development Assistance (ODA) established by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD/DAC).
Parlament je sprejel pet resolucij, v katerih nasprotuje osnutkom sklepov Komisije glede instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje, saj so vsebovali ukrepe, ki niso bili v skladu z zahtevami za uradno razvojno pomoč
Parliament adopted five resolutions objecting to draft Commission decisions under the DCI as they included actions which did not meet the ODA requirements
Resolucija z dne 15. februarja 2007 o osnutku sklepov Komisije o pripravi strateških dokumentov držav in okvirnih programov za Malezijo, Brazilijo in Pakistan (UL C 287 E, 29.11.2007, str.
Resolution of 15 February 2007 on the draft Commission decisions establishing Country Strategy Papers and Indicative Programmes for Malaysia, Brazil and Pakistan (OJ C 287 E, 29.11.2007, p.
Resolucija z dne 7. junija 2007 o osnutku sklepa Komisije o pripravi regionalnih strateških dokumentov in okvirnih programov za Mercosur in Latinsko Ameriko (UL C 125 E, 22.5.2008, str.
Resolution of 7 June 2007 on the draft Commission decision establishing Regional Strategy Papers and Regional Indicative Programmes for Mercosur and Latin America (OJ C 125 E, 22.5.2008, p.
Resolucija z dne 21. junija 2007 o osnutku sklepa Komisije o pripravi regionalnega strateškega dokumenta 2007–2013 in osnutka večletnega programa za Azijo (UL C 146 E, 12.6.2008, str.
Resolution of 21 June 2007 on the draft Commission decision establishing a Regional Strategy Document 2007-2013 and a Multiannual Indicative Programme for Asia (OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p.
Resolucija z dne 25. oktobra 2007 o osnutku sklepa Komisije o pripravi posebnega ukrepa 2007 za Irak ( T6-0481/2007 ).
Resolution of 25 October 2007 on the draft Commission decision establishing a Special Measure 2007 for Iraq ( T6-0481/2007 ).
Resolucija z dne 9. julija 2008 o osnutku sklepov Komisije o pripravi letnega akcijskega programa za Brazilijo in Argentino za leto 2008 ( T6-0338/2008 ). , zaradi česar so bila sredstva, namenjena za izkoreninjene revščine in napredek pri uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, preusmerjena k drugim ciljem.
Resolution of 9 July 2008 on the draft Commission decisions establishing Annual Action Programmes for Brazil for 2008 and for Argentina for 2008 ( T6-0338/2008 ). , thus diverting funds earmarked for poverty eradication and progress towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals to other objectives.
Predlog Komisije se razume kot neposredni odgovor na delo Parlamenta pri nadzoru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje in se zato pozdravlja.
It is understood that the Commission’s proposal responds directly to the work carried out by Parliament in the scrutiny of DCI, and it is therefore very welcome.
Namen predloga je vzpostaviti novo pravno podlago, da bo Evropska skupnost lahko financirala strateško in politično pomembne ukrepe v državah v razvoju, ki pa ne izpolnjujejo meril instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
The proposal aims to create a new legal base allowing the European Community to finance actions in developing countries which are of strategic and political importance but do not meet the criteria of the DCI.
Vendar obstaja težava v zvezi z virom financiranja.
There is a problem, however, with the source of financing.
Namen predloga je prerazporeditev 108,5 milijona EUR iz ustreznih geografskih sredstev instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje, kot je navedeno v oceni finančnih posledic zakonodajnega predloga.
The proposal seeks to re-allocate EUR 108.5 million from the corresponding DCI geographic envelopes, as outlined in the legislative financial statement.
Ko sta se Parlament in Svet dogovorila o načrtovanju proračuna v okviru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje, je bilo mišljeno, da bodo ta sredstva uporabljena v skladu s cilji in merili iz ustreznega finančnega poročila.
When Parliament and Council agreed on the budget to be programmed under the DCI, this was done on the understanding that these funds would be used in line with the objectives and the criteria laid down in the respective financial instrument.
Oblikovanje nove pravne podlage pa ne upravičuje preusmeritve teh sredstev, ki so bila izrecno namenjena za razvoj, za uresničevanje drugih političnih ciljev.
The creation of a new legal basis does not justify the diversion of these funds, clearly earmarked for development, to other political objectives.
Zato bi bilo tudi povsem nesprejemljivo, da bi se zmanjšal proračun za razvojno sodelovanje na ravni Skupnosti.
In this context, it would clearly be unacceptable also to reduce the development cooperation budget at European level.
Cilji ukrepov, ki se bodo financirali iz spremenjenega finančnega instrumenta ICI v državah v razvoju, niso neposredno povezani z izkoreninjenjem revščine, niti ne izpolnjujejo meril za uradno razvojno pomoč.
The objectives of the measures to be financed under the amended ICI financing instrument in developing countries are not directly geared to poverty eradication, nor do they fulfil the criteria for official development assistance.
Zato je treba je uporabiti nadomestne vire financiranja, na primer iz razlik do zgornje meje iz razdelka 4 finančnega okvira.
Alternative funding, such as from the margins in Heading 4 of the Financial Framework, has therefore to be used.
To načelo je izraženo v predlogu spremembe 7.
This principle is expressed by Amendment 7.
Treba je tudi zagotoviti, da načrtovani ukrepi v državah v razvoju
It must also be ensured that the measures envisaged in developing countries
Začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe ima pomemben vpliv na spremembo uredbe ICI.
The entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty has major impact on the amendment of the ICI Regulation.
Prvič, zdaj se uporablja redni zakonodajni postopek, kar ima vpliv na pravice, ki jih mora Parlament imeti pri demokratičnem nadzoru načrtovanja.
Firstly, the ordinary legislative procedure now applies, which has consequences for the rights Parliament must enjoy in the democratic control of the programming.
Vaš poročevalec meni, da se bodo ukrepi iz ICI+, navedeni v členu 5 (večletni programi sodelovanja), šteli za delegirane akte (člen 290 PDEU), s čimer bo Parlament imel pravico do veta in tako veliko močnejše nadzorne pristojnosti kot v postopku komitologije, ki se je predhodno uporabljal.
Your rapporteur holds the view that the measures under the ICI+ mentioned in Article 5 (multi-annual cooperation programmes) are to be considered delegated acts (Article 290 TFEU), giving Parliament a veto right and thus much stronger scrutiny powers than under the previously applied comitology procedure.
Vaš poročevalec ni predlagal posebnih predlogov sprememb glede tega vprašanja, saj to sodi v pristojnost vodilnega odbora.
Your rapporteur has not proposed specific amendments on this issue as this falls into the remit of the lead committee.
Vendar meni, da bi moral odbor, pristojen za instrument za industrializirane države, vključitev člena 290 določiti kot pogoj, da Parlament sprejme spremembo uredbe.
He considers, however, that the Committee responsible for the ICI should make the inclusion of Article 290 a condition for Parliament to agree to the amended Regulation.
Drugič, pravna podlaga za gospodarsko sodelovanje s tretjimi državami (člen 212 PDEU) se ne more več uporabljati za ukrepe v državah v razvoju.
Secondly, the legal base for economic cooperation with third countries (Article 212 TFEU) can no longer be used for actions in developing countries.
Člen 1 - točka 2
Article 1 – point 2
Najpomembnejši cilj sodelovanja z državami in ozemlji iz odstavka 1 je predvideti ustrezen odziv na potrebo po krepitvi vezi ter poglobiti medsebojne stike na dvostranski, regionalni ali večstranski osnovi, da bi ustvarili ugodnejše razmere za razvoj odnosov Skupnosti s temi državami in ozemlji ter spodbudili dialog in obenem krepili interese Skupnosti ter prispevali k procesu trajnostnega razvoja .
The primary objective of cooperation with the countries and territories referred to in paragraph 1 shall be to provide a specific response to the need to strengthen links and to engage further with them on a bilateral, regional or multilateral basis in order to create a more favourable environment for the development of the relations of the Community with these countries and territories and promote dialogue while fostering Community’s interests and contributing to sustainable development processes .
Člen 1 - točka 3 a (novo)
Article 1 – point 3 a (new)
(3a) Doda se naslednji člen:
(3a) The following article is inserted:
"Člen 2a
“Article 2a
V zvezi z državami iz priloge II se strogo spoštuje usklajenost politike z ukrepi, financiranimi v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1905/2006 in Uredbo (ES) št. 1337/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o ustanovitvi instrumenta za hitro odzivanje na hitro naraščajoče cen hrane v državah v razvoju 1 .
In relation to countries listed in Annex II, policy coherence with measures financed under Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 and Regulation (EC) No 1337/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 establishing a facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries 1 shall be strictly observed.
1 UL L 354, 31.12.2008, str.
1 OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p.
Člen 1 - točka 3 b (novo)
Article 1 – point 3 b (new)
(3b) V členu 3 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(3b) In Article 3, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
Pri izvajanju te uredbe se, če je to primerno, uporabi diferenciran pristop za oblikovanje sodelovanja s partnerskimi državami, da bi upoštevali njihove gospodarske, družbene in politične razmere ter posebne interese, strategije in prednostne naloge Skupnosti , zlasti njen cilj prispevanja k trajnostnemu gospodarskemu, socialnemu in okoljskemu razvoju držav v razvoju. "
In the implementation of this Regulation, a differentiated approach in designing cooperation with partner countries shall be pursued, where appropriate, to take account of their economic, social and political contexts as well as of the Community’s specific interests, strategies and priorities, in particular its objective to contribute to the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of developing countries .”
Člen 1 - točka 3 c (novo)
Article 1 – point 3 c (new)
Skupnost si pri ukrepih, ki se financirajo v okviru te uredbe, prizadeva zagotoviti skladnost z drugimi področji zunanjepolitičnega delovanja in drugimi politikami Skupnosti, zlasti z razvojnim sodelovanjem .
For measures financed under this Regulation, the Community shall aim to ensure coherence with other areas of its external action as well as other relevant Community policies , in particular development cooperation.
Ta usklajenost se zagotavlja pri določanju politik, strateškem načrtovanju ter oblikovanju in izvajanju ukrepov."
This shall be ensured by formulating policy, strategic planning and the programming and implementation of measures.”
Člen 1 - točka 3 d (novo)
Article 1 – point 3 d (new)
Člen 4 – pododstavek 2
Article 4 – subparagraph 2
(3d) V členu 4 se točka 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(3d) In Article 4, point 2 is replaced by the following:
"2. pospeševanje dvostranske trgovine, investicijskih tokov in gospodarskih partnerstev v skladu z razvojnimi cilji tisočletja ;"
“2. the stimulation of bilateral trade, investment flows and economic partnerships in accordance with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs);”
Člen 1 - točka 3 e (novo)
Article 1 – point 3 e (new)
Člen 4 – pododstavek 5 a (novo)
Article 4 – subparagraph 5 a (new)
(3e) Doda se naslednji pododstavek:
(3e) The following subparagraph is inserted:
"5a. spodbujanje skupnih rešitev večstranskih vprašanj, kot so podnebne spremembe, preskrba z energijo, mir in razvoj, s posebnim poudarkom na trajnostni tehnologiji;"
“5a. fostering common solutions to multilateral challenges such as climate change, energy security, peace and development, with a particular focus on sustainable technology;”
Člen 1 - točka 5
Article 1 – point 5
Referenčni finančni znesek za izvajanje te uredbe za obdobje od leta 2007 do 2013 je 172 milijonov EUR za države, naštete v Prilogi I, in 176 milijonov EUR za države, naštete v Prilogi II.
The financial reference amount for the implementation of this Regulation for the period from 2007 to 2013 shall be EUR 172 million for countries listed in Annex I and EUR 176 million for countries listed in Annex II.
Proračunski organ odobri letna proračunska sredstva v mejah finančnega okvira.
The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial framework.
Ukrepi v državah iz priloge II se financirajo iz razlik do zgornje meje iz razdelka 4 finančnega okvira ali drugih sredstev na voljo za financiranje zunanjih ukrepov.
The measures in countries listed in Annex II shall be financed from the margin under heading 4 of the financial framework or by other means available in the context of financing external actions.
Sredstva, ki so bila načrtovana za uporabo v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006, se ne uporabljajo v ta namen.
Appropriations programmed for use under Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 shall not be used for this purpose.
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1934/2006 o oblikovanju instrumenta za financiranje sodelovanja z industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1934/2006 establishing a financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories
Evropski parlament je že večkrat izrazil nasprotovanje praksi financiranja ukrepov, ki niso uradna razvojna pomoč (URP), iz instrumenta razvojnega sodelovanja (IRS) v državah, ki jih krije ta instrument.
On several occasions, the European Parliament has expressed its disagreement with the practice of using the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) to finance measures other than official development assistance (ODA) in countries covered by the DCI.
Ker je opredelitev merila za izpolnjevanje pogojev za URP v členu 2.4 uredbe o IRS omejevalna, nekateri ukrepi, financirani v okviru uredbe, niso bili upravičeni.
As Article 2(4) of the DCI Regulation gives a restrictive definition of the eligibility criterion for ODA, a number of measures funded under the Regulation were unjustified.
Vendar imajo ti ukrepi jasen strateški pomen za Unijo, v kolikor omogočajo vzpostavitev močnih vezi z nekaterimi regionalnimi in svetovnimi akterji, kot so Kitajska, Indija, Južna Afrika in Brazilija.
However, these measures are of incontestable strategic interest to the Union, in that they make it possible to establish strong links with certain regional and global players, such as China, India, South Africa or Brazil.
Da bi zagotovili trajnost teh ukrepov in da bi ne spreminjali smisla uredbe o IRS, Komisija v skladu z zahtevami Parlamenta predlaga:
In order to enable these measures to continue and not to alter the sense of the DCI Regulation, the Commission proposes, in accordance with what Parliament has called for, to:
– financiranje ukrepov, ki niso URP, v okviru instrumenta za financiranje sodelovanja z industrializiranimi državami (IID), ki naj se spremeni glede na namen tega predloga;
- finance measures other than ODA from the financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised countries (ICI) and to amend it accordingly, which is the purpose of this proposal;
– razširitev geografskega obsega IID (IID+), da se vključijo te države v razvoju in se tako omogoči zakonodajno nadaljevanje teh štirih pripravljalnih ukrepov, za katere se je proračunski organ odločil, da jih bo financiral v letih 2007–2009;
- extend the geographical scope of the ICI (ICI+) to include these developing countries, thus making it possible to establish a legislative follow-up to the four preparatory actions which the budgetary authority has decided to finance in 2007-2009;
– spremembo sredstev, dodeljenih za IID za večletno obdobje, z načrtovanjem referenčnega zneska 176 milijonov EUR za obdobje 2010–2013, namenjenega financiranju teh ukrepov z državami v razvoju;
- alter the multiannual budget allocation of the ICI by programming a reference amount of €176 m for the period 2010-2013 to finance these actions with developing countries;
– financiranje dodeljenih sredstev v višini 176 milijonov EUR:
- finance this €176 m allocation by means of:
– s prerazporeditvijo 108,5 milijona EUR v okviru IRS,
- a redeployment of €108.5 m under the DCI
– z uporabo razlik do zgornje meje iz razdelka 4 večletnega finančnega okvira v znesku 67,5 milijona EUR.
- use of the margins of Heading 4 of the multiannual financial framework to provide €67.5 m.
Poročevalec želi najprej opozoriti, da je Odbor za proračun leta 2008 pozval Odbor za razvoj v okviru svojega poročila o pobudi na to temo, da preuči oblikovanje novega ad hoc instrumenta za financiranje kot najbolj stvarno alternativo, ter da je izrazil svojo zaskrbljenost glede morebitne politične "nečitljivosti" spremenjenega IID, ki bi vključeval tudi države v razvoju.
Your rapporteur wishes first of all to recall that in 2008 the Committee on Budgets asked the Committee on Development, in connection with its own-initiative report on this subject, to consider creating a new ad hoc financial instrument as the most realistic alternative and that it expressed its fear that amending the ICI so as to include developing countries in it might run the risk of a certain political unintelligibility.
Pozdravlja predlog o spremembi, v kolikor pomeni zakonodajno nadaljevanje pripravljalnih ukrepov iz odstavka 6(b) člena 49 finančne uredbe.
He welcomes the amending proposal in that it represents legislative action further to the preparatory actions provided for by Article 49(6)(b) of the Financial Regulation.
Opozoriti želi, da je položaj razlik do zgornje meje v razdelku 4 tako tesen, da Parlament lahko le ponovno opozori Komisijo in Svet, da ob upoštevanju smisla in stvarnosti opravita vmesni pregled večletnega finančnega okvira in zvišata zgornjo mejo razdelka 4 za obdobje 2011–2013.
He would recall that the situation with regard to the Heading 4 margins is so tight that Parliament can only call on the Commission and Council once again to act sensibly and realistically during the mid-term review of the multiannual financial framework by raising the ceiling for Heading 4 for 2011-2013.
Opozarja tudi, da je Parlament vedno menil, da bi nova politika ali nov instrument morali pomeniti nova sredstva in ne prerazporeditve že dodeljenih sredstev drugim politikam ali instrumentom.
He also recalls that Parliament has always considered that a new policy or a new instrument should entail new resources rather than a redistribution of resources already allocated to other policies or instruments.
Brez takšnega ukrepa Parlament kot veja proračunskega organa ne more sočasno zagotavljati spoštovanja obveznosti do tretjih držav, opredelitve novih prednostnih nalog in potrebne odzivnosti na nepredvidene krize.
Without such a measure, Parliament as one arm of the budgetary authority cannot simultaneously guarantee respect for commitments given to third countries, the definition of new priorities and the responsiveness necessary in order to cope with unforeseen crises.
Poleg tega je treba v položaju izjemne proračunske napetosti, ki izhaja iz gospodarske krize, tako za države članice kot za samo Unijo, s posebno strogostjo uporabljati sredstva v korist držav v razvoju, v katerih je življenjski standard včasih primerljiv s tistim v nekaterih državah članicah, ki so naše glavne trgovske tekmice in ki do zdaj niso pokazale zadostnega sodelovanja pri prizadevanju za svetovni sporazum o Dohi in nadaljevanje Kjotskega sporazuma.
Furthermore, in the situation of extreme budgetary tension which has arisen because of the economic crisis, both for Member States and for the Union itself, particular rigour is called for in using appropriations for emerging countries, whose standard of living is in some cases comparable to that of certain Member States, which are our principal commercial competitors and which so far have been insufficiently cooperative in seeking a global agreement on Doha and on the post-Kyoto arrangements.
V skladu s tem so vloženi predlogi sprememb.
Hence the proposed amendments.
S tem pridržkom poročevalec meni, da je predlog uredbe Sveta glede razdelitve finančnih sredstev (prerazporeditev v okviru IRS in delna uporaba razlik do zgornjih meja iz razdelka 4) ustrezen in v skladu z večletnim finančnim okvirom 2007–2013.
Subject to this reservation, your rapporteur considers that, in terms of allocation of sources of financing (redeployment within the DCI and partial use of the margins of Heading 4), the proposal for a Council regulation is appropriate and compatible with the multiannual financial framework for 2007-2013.
Osnutek zakonodajne resolucije
Text proposed by the Commission
1 a. meni, da je predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1934/2006 o oblikovanju instrumenta za financiranje sodelovanja z industrializiranimi državami ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom v skladu z večletnim finančnim okvirom 2007–2013; kljub temu opozarja, da o letnih odobrenih sredstvih za obdobje 2007–2013 odloča proračunski organ v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka;
Considers the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1934/2006 establishing a financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories to be compatible with the multiannual financial framework for 2007-2013; recalls nonetheless that the annual appropriations for the period 2010-2013 will be decided by the budgetary authority as part of the annual budget procedure;
5 a ker je gospodarska kriza ustvarila izjemno proračunsko napetost v celotni Uniji in ker predlagana razširitev zadeva države, ki so v nekaterih primerih dosegle konkurenčnost, primerljivo konkurenčnosti Unije, in povprečen življenjski standard, podoben tistemu v nekaterih državah članicah, bi morala pomoč Skupnosti biti sorazmerna s prizadevanji držav upravičenk za odprtje njihovih trgov, spoštovanje mednarodnih sporazumov Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) in Mednarodne organizacije dela (MOD) ter prispevanje k svetovnim prizadevanjem za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov.
(5a) As the economic crisis has created extreme budgetary tension throughout the Union, and as the proposed extension concerns countries which have in some cases achieved competitiveness comparable to that of the Union and a mean standard of living close to that of certain Member States, Community aid should be proportionate to the efforts made by the recipient countries to open up their markets, comply with the international agreements of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), and help to pursue global objectives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
o vrednotenju in oceni akcijskega načrta za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010
on evaluation and assessment of the Animal Welfare Action Plan 2006-2010
Poročevalka: Marit Paulsen
Rapporteur: Marit Paulsen
o vrednotenju in oceni akcijskega načrta za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010
on evaluation and assessment of the Animal Welfare Action 2006-2010