natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zveza evropskih nevladnih organizacij, kot so fundacija PAN Parks, zveza Europarc, Eurosite, Wild Europe, Birdlife International in WWF, podpira boljše varstvo evropske dediščine divjine.
There is a coalition of European NGOs such as the PAN Parks Foundation Europarc Federation, Eurosite, Wild Europe, Birdlife International and WWF, which support the improved protection of Europe’s wilderness heritage.
V evropsko omrežje Natura 2000 so že vključena najdragocenejša in biotsko najbolj raznolika območja Evropske unije.
The European network of Natura 2000 already covers the most valuable and bio-diverse areas of the European Union.
To pomeni, da je vsaj velik del evropske divjine zaščiten v okviru Nature 2000.
This means that at least a big part of European wilderness is protected under the Natura 2000.
Treba je odgovoriti na ta izziv.
What we need to do is respond to this challenge.
13 % gozdne površine 27 držav članic EU je opredeljenih kot območja Nature 2000 v skladu z direktivama EU o pticah in habitatih.
13% of the forest zone of the 27 EU member states is designated as Natura 2000 sites, under EU Birds and Habitats directive.
Natura 2000 zagotavlja prožen okvir, ki od držav članic zahteva določitev ciljev ohranjanja ter varstvo in upravljanje območij na način, ki obnavlja ali ohranja ugodno ohranitveno stanje vrst in habitatov, zaradi katerih so bila območja oblikovana.
Natura 2000 provides a flexible framework which asks Member States to formulate conservation objectives, and protect and manage the sites in a way that restores or maintains the favourable conservation status of the species and habitats for which the sites are designated.
Nova zakonodaja o divjini ni potrebna, vendar je toplo priporočljivo, da se območjem divjine dodeli posebno mesto in večje varstvo v okviru Nature 2000.
There is no need for a new legislation concerning Wilderness, but it is highly recommended to give a special role and extra protection for Wilderness zones inside Natura 2000.
Zato bi morala Evropska komisija oblikovati ustrezna priporočila s smernicami za države članice EU, kako najbolje zagotoviti varstvo sedanjih in potencialnih območij divjine ter njihovih naravnih procesov, ki so vključeni v Naturo 2000.
That's why European Commission should develop appropriate recommendations that provide guidance to the EU Member States on best ways of ensuring the protection of present and potential wilderness or wildlands and their natural processes, which are likely covered by the Natura 2000.
Smernice bi morale vsebovati: opredelitev divjine za Evropski parlament, kartiranje zadnjih evropskih območij divjine, saj je treba poznati razporeditev in sedanjo površino še neokrnjenih območij (razdeljenih v glavne habitatne tipe: področja divjine z gozdovi, v sladkih vodah in na morju), pripravo študije o vrednosti/koristih varstva divjine, oblikovanje smernic glede divjine za omrežje Natura 2000, vključno z evropsko strategijo o divjini.
This should include: definition of wilderness for European Parliament, mapping of Europe's last wilderness area, because we shall know the distribution and the current cover of still untouched area (divided in major habitats types: forest, freshwater and marine wilderness areas), establishment of a study on the value / benefits of wilderness protection, development of wilderness guidelines for the Natura 2000 network, including an European wilderness strategy.
Treba je dodeliti posebna sredstva za zmanjšanje razdrobljenosti, skrbno upravljanje območij, ponovno prepuščenih divjini, vzpostavitev mehanizmov in programov za nadomestila, ozaveščanje, dvig razumevanja, turistično ponudbo, oceno in izboljšanje učinkovitosti upravljanja.
Funding should be allocated for reducing fragmentation, careful management of re-wilding areas, development of compensation mechanism and programmes, awareness, building interpretation, tourism packages, measuring and improving management effectiveness.
o razmerah na področju temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji 2004–2008
on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union 2004-2008
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
MOTION FOR A EUROPEN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION..................................................3
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION................................29
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................32
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
MOTION FOR A EUROPEN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
o razmerah na področju temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji 2004 – 2008
on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union 2004‑2008
– ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljevanju Listina o temeljnih pravicah) z dne 7. decembra 2000, sprejete 12. decembra 2007,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter) of 7 December 2000, as adopted on 12 December 2007,
– ob upoštevanju ciljev o Uniji kot območju svobode, varnosti in pravice ter izvajanju načel svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in načel pravne države, zapisanih v členih 6 in 7 pogodbe o Evropski uniji (EU),
– having regard to the objectives of making the Union an area of freedom, security and justice and of implementing the principles of liberty, democracy and respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, as set out in Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union (EU),
– ob upoštevanju bistvenih novosti, o katerih so se vlade držav članic sporazumele 13. decembra 2007 in jih potrdile s podpisom lizbonske pogodbe, med katerimi je v prvi vrsti pravno zavezujoča narava Listine o temeljnih pravicah in obvezen pristop k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
– having regard to the innovations to which the governments of the Member States gave their agreement on 13 December 2007 by signing the Lisbon Treaty, the most significant of which are the conferral of binding legal status on the Charter and the requirement to accede to the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the ECHR),
22. in Direktive 2000/78/ES Sveta z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu
22. , Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation
UL L 303, 2.12.2000, str.
OJ L 303 2.12.2000, p.
16. ter okvirne konvencije Sveta Evrope za varstvo narodnih manjšin,
16. , and to the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities,
UL L 53, 22.2.07, str.
OJ L 53, 22.2.2007, p.
1. (v nadaljevanju Agencija za temeljne pravice),
1. (hereinafter the Agency),
– ob upoštevanju poročil Agencije za temeljne pravice in Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije ter poročil nevladnih organizacij,
– having regard to the reports of the Agency, the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia and the non-governmental organisations (NGOs) concerned,
– ob upoštevanju odločitev Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice,
– having regard to the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) and of the European Court of Human Rights,
– ob upoštevanju letnih poročil o razmerah na področju temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji, ki jih je pripravila mreža neodvisnih strokovnjakov Evropske unije,
– having regard to the annual reports on fundamental rights in the European Union drawn up by the European Union’s network of independent experts,
– ob upoštevanju poročil organov Sveta Evrope, zlasti poročil o stanju na področju človekovih pravic parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope in komisarja Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice,
– having regard to the reports by the bodies of the Council of Europe, in particular the reports on the human rights situation drawn up by the Parliamentary Assembly and the Commissioner for Human Rights,
– ob upoštevanju svojih poročil o obiskih v centrih za pridržanje priseljencev, ki nimajo urejenega statusa,
– having regard to its reports on visits to detention centres for immigrants in an irregular situation,
– ob upoštevanju resolucij s področja temeljnih in človekovih pravic,
– having regard to its resolutions on fundamental rights and human rights,
– ob upoštevanju javnih sej in izmenjav mnenj, ki jih je odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve organiziral kot pripravo na to poročilo, zlasti srečanj 8. oktobra 2007 s sodniki ustavnih in vrhovnih sodišč, 19. maja 2008 s komisarjem Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice in 6. oktobra s predstavniki nevladnih organizacij,
– having regard to the series of public meetings and exchanges of views organised in preparation for the drafting of this resolution by its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, in particular those held on 8 October 2007 with constitutional and supreme court judges, on 19 May 2008 with the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights and on 6 October 2008 with representatives of non-governmental organisations,
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0479/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Culture ( A6-0479/2008 ),
A. ker člen 6 pogodbe o Evropski uniji to utemeljuje kot skupnost vrednost, ki spoštuje temeljne pravice, kot jih zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin in ki izhajajo iz skupne ustavne tradicije držav članic,
A. whereas Article 6 of the EU Treaty states that the European Union is based on a community of values and on respect for fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the ECHR and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States,
B. ker se Evropski parlament kot neposredno izvoljen predstavnik državljanov Unije, ki jamči za njihove pravice, zaveda svoje velike odgovornosti pri uresničevanju teh načel, zlasti ker je po zdaj veljavnih pogodbah pravica do pritožbe posameznika pred sodišči Skupnosti in pri evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic zelo omejena,
B. whereas Parliament, as the directly elected representative of the citizens of the Union and guarantor of their rights, believes that it has a clear responsibility to uphold these principles, in particular as the Treaties in their current form greatly restrict the individual’s right to bring actions before the Community courts and the European Ombudsman,
C. ker je vzpostavitev postopka nadzora nad združljivostjo zakonodajnih predlogov z Listino o temeljnih pravicah ena nujnih posledic njenega sprejetja 7. decembra 2000, kot je to priznala Komisija, ko je leta 2001 sprejela določbe s tega področja, in kot je Parlament na to opozoril ob sprejetju resolucije s 15. marca 2007 o spoštovanju Listine o temeljnih pravicah v zakonodajnih predlogih Komisije ter o metodologiji sistematičnega in strogega nadzora,
C. whereas the introduction of a procedure for monitoring the compatibility of legislative proposals with the Charter is an inevitable consequence of its adoption on 7 December 2000, as the Commission acknowledged when adopting corresponding provisions in 2001 and as Parliament pointed out when adopting its resolution of 15 March 2007 on compliance with the Charter in the Commission’s legislative proposals: methodology for systematic and rigorous monitoring,
D. ker se lizbonska pogodba, ki je v postopku ratifikacije, izrecno sklicuje na Listino o temeljnih pravicah in ji daje enako pravno vrednost, kot jo imajo ustanovne pogodbe,
D. whereas the Lisbon Treaty, which is currently undergoing ratification, makes explicit reference to the Charter and confers on it the same legal value as the Treaties,
E. ker bodo v primeru, če bi listina postala del primarne zakonodaje Unije, v njej opredeljene pravice postale zavezujoče, in sicer s sekundarno zakonodajo, s katero se bodo začele izvajati,
E. whereas, should the Charter be incorporated into Union primary law, the rights defined therein will acquire binding force by means of the secondary law implementing them,
F. ker je Listina o temeljnih pravicah neodvisno od svojega pravnega statusa z leti postala vir navdiha za sodno prakso evropskih sodišč, kot so Sodišče prve stopnje in Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, ter številnih ustavnih sodišč,
F. whereas, irrespective of its legal status, the Charter has over the years become a source of inspiration in the case-law of the European courts, such as the Court of First Instance (CFI) and the ECJ, the European Court of Human Rights and many constitutional courts,
1. meni, da sta učinkovito varovanje in uveljavljanje temeljnih pravic temelj demokracije v Evropi in bistveni pogoj za utrditev evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice;
Considers that the effective protection and the promotion of fundamental rights form the basis of democracy in Europe and are prerequisites for the consolidation of the European area of freedom, security and justice;
6. poudarja, da se Evropsko sodišče pri svoji sodni praksi glede temeljnih pravic sicer lahko zgleduje po skupni ustavni tradiciji držav članic in Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah je skupna podlaga za minimalne pravice, vendar države članice iz tega ne morejo sklepati, da bi lahko zmanjšale raven zaščite pravic z izgovorom, da listina zagotavlja nižjo raven zaščite kot njihova ustava;
Emphasises that if the constitutional traditions common to the Member States can be drawn on by the ECJ as a source of inspiration in the framing of its judicial doctrine on fundamental rights, that the Charter constitutes a common basis of minimum rights, and that the Member States cannot use the argument that the Charter would provide a lower level of protection of certain rights than the safeguards offered under their own constitutions as a pretext for watering down those safeguards;
Splošna priporočila
General recommendations
12. poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj uporabita informacije, ki jih bodo zaradi spremljanja po Evropski uniji zagotovili Agencija za temeljne pravice, Svet Evrope, nadzorni organi Združenih narodov, nacionalni inštituti za človekove pravice in nevladne organizacije, ter jih pretvorita v popravne ukrepe ali preventivni pravni okvir;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to use the information available as a result of the monitoring carried out within the European Union by the Agency, the Council of Europe, United Nations monitoring bodies, national human rights institutions and NGOs and to translate that information into corrective measures or a preventive legal framework;
15. poziva Svet, naj v prihodnje v letna poročila o človekovih pravicah po svetu vključi analizo razmer po svetu, pa tudi v vseh državah članicah; ocenjuje, da bi takšna dvojna analiza jasno pokazala, da se Unija pri varovanju človekovih pravic enakovredno angažira znotraj in zunaj svojih meja, s tem pa bi se izognili nevarnosti obtožb o uporabi dvojnih meril;
Calls on the Council to incorporate in its future annual reports on human rights in the world an analysis of the situation in the world and in each Member State; takes the view that a twin-track analysis of this kind would highlight the Union’s equal commitment to protecting human rights both inside and outside its borders, so as to ward off any accusations of double standards;
17. vztraja, da bi moral Svet ad hoc delovno skupino o temeljnih pravicah in državljanstvu preoblikovati v stalno delovno skupino, ki bi delovala vzporedno z delovno skupino za človekove pravice, Komisijo pa poziva, naj listnico za človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine zaupa enemu samemu komisarju;
Urges the Council to transform its ad hoc working party on fundamental rights and citizenship into a standing working party, which would work in tandem with the Working Party on Human Rights (COHOM), and calls on the Commission to allocate the human rights and fundamental freedoms portfolio to a single Commissioner;
Sodelovanje s Svetom Evrope in drugimi mednarodnimi institucijami in organizacijami za varovanje človekovih pravic
Cooperation with the Council of Europe and the other international institutions and organisations responsible for the protection of fundamental rights
Svet Evrope – Evropska unija: „Ena sama ambicija za evropsko celino“, poročilo Jean-Clauda Junckerja, 11. april 2006, str.
Council of Europe - European Union: ‘A sole ambition for the European continent’, report by Jean-Claude Juncker, 11 April 2006, p.
25. priporoča Evropski uniji, naj sklene sporazume o sodelovanju z mednarodnimi institucijami in organizacijami za varovanje temeljnih pravic, zlasti z uradom visokega komisarja Organizacije združenih narodov za človekove pravice in drugimi organi te organizacije, ki delujejo na tem področju, pa tudi z uradom za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice ter visokim komisarjem za narodnostne manjšine Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi;
Urges the European Union to conclude cooperation agreements with the international institutions and organisations responsible for the protection of fundamental rights, and in particular with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the other UN bodies which play a role in that area and with the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights and the High Commissioner on National Minorities of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe;
26. poudarja, da je treba med razvojem pristojnosti Unije oceniti in popolnoma spoštovati temeljne pravice in svoboščine posameznikov; glede na to ocenjuje, da cilja spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in zagotavljanja skupne varnosti nista le združljiva, temveč soodvisna, in da z ustreznimi politikami lahko preprečimo, da bi represivni pristop ogrozil svoboščine posameznikov;
Emphasises the need to assess and fully respect fundamental rights and individual freedoms as the Union’s powers develop; takes the view, on that basis, that the two objectives of respecting fundamental rights and safeguarding collective security are not only compatible but interdependent, and that appropriate policies can ensure that individual freedoms are not threatened by a repressive approach;
28. opozarja na pravico oseb, ki jim je bila odvzeta prostost, do vseh pravnih jamstev in ustrezne pomoči diplomatskih predstavništev držav, katere državljani so, ter do storitev neodvisnega tolmača;
Emphasises the right of any arrested person to be provided with full legal safeguards and, where appropriate, assistance from the diplomatic representation of the country of which he or she is a national and the services of an independent interpreter;
31. izrecno poziva institucije EU in države članice, naj začnejo izvajati priporočila iz njegove resolucije z dne 14. februarja 2007 o domnevni uporabi evropskih držav za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje ujetnikov s strani ameriške obveščevalne agencije Cia
Strongly urges the EU institutions and the Member States to implement the recommendations contained in its resolution of 14 February 2007 on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners
1 UL C 287 E, 29.11.2007, str.
1 OJ C 287 E, 29.11.2007, p.
1 ; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja izjavo novoizvoljenega ameriškega predsednika o zaprtju prostorov za pridržanje v Guantanamu in o začetku sojenja tem zapornikom; poziva države članice, naj izrazijo pripravljenost za skupno iskanje rešitev za druge zapornike;
1 ; welcomes in this context the statement by the US President-Elect on closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and bringing the inmates to trial; calls on Member States to declare their readiness to jointly find solutions for remaining inmates;
Splošni pregled
General observations
Poročilo Agencije za temeljne pravice za leto 2008, objavljeno 24. junija 2008 ;
2008 Annual Report of the European Agency for fundamental rights, published on 24 June 2008. ;
Protokol št. 12 h Konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, podpisan 4. novembra 2000. k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, saj predpisuje splošno prepoved vseh oblik diskriminacije in zagotavlja, da noben javni organ ne bo proti nikomur izvajal diskriminacije na kateri koli podlagi; takšne določbe zaenkrat ni v nobenem veljavnem pravnem aktu Evropske unije ali Sveta Evrope;
Protocol No 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed on 4 November 2000. to the ECHR, given that it provides for a general ban on all forms of discrimination, guaranteeing that nobody will be discriminated against for any reason whatsoever by any public authority; notes that such a provision is currently absent from the legal acts in force of both the European Union and the Council of Europe;
38. obžaluje, da predlagana direktiva pušča veliko vrzeli v pravnem varstvu pred diskriminacijo, zlasti z dolgo vrsto izjem, ki se nanašajo na javni red, javno varnost in javno zdravje, gospodarske dejavnosti in družinski status ter na reproduktivne pravice, izobraževanje in veroizpoved; je zaskrbljen, ker utegnejo te „klavzule za izogibanje“ dejansko uzakoniti obstoječe diskriminatorno ravnanje, namesto da bi odpravile diskriminacijo; opominja Komisijo, da mora biti direktiva skladna z obstoječo sodno prakso na področju pravic lezbijk, homoseksualcev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev, zlasti s sodbo v zadevi Maruko
Regrets that the proposed directive leaves substantial gaps in legal protection against discrimination, notably through a wide range of exceptions relating to public order, public security and public health, economic activities, marital and family status and reproductive rights, education and religion; is concerned that, rather than banning discrimination, these 'escape clauses' may actually serve to codify existing discriminatory practices; reminds the Commission that the directive must be in line with existing case-law in the area of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people rights, notably the Maruko ruling
V zadevi C 267/06 Tadao Maruko proti Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen z dne 1. aprila 2008 je Evropsko sodišče odločilo, da je zavrnitev izplačila vdovske pokojnine preživelemu partnerju neposredna diksriminacija na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti, če je preživeli življenjski partner glede tovrstnega izplačila v položaju, primerljivem s položajem zakonca. ;
In Case C 267/06 Tadao Maruko v. Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen of 1 April 2008 the European Court of Justice rules that the refusal to grant the survivor’s pension to life partners constitutes direct discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, if surviving spouses and surviving life partners are in a comparable situation as regards that pension. ;
11522/2007 – C6-0246/2007 – 2001/0270(CNS) . v skladu s političnim dogovorom iz decembra 2007; opozarja na svoje mnenje z dne 29. novembra 2007
11522/2007 - C6-0246/2007 - 2001/0270(CNS) . further to the political agreement of December 2007; points to its opinion of 29 November 2007
A6-0444/2007 . , v katerem izraža naklonjenost temu predlogu; poziva Komisijo, naj po posvetovanju z Agencijo za temeljne pravice predlaga podoben zakonodajni akt za boj proti homofobiji;
A6-0444/2007 . , which endorsed the proposal; calls on the Commission, after consulting the Agency, to propose similar legislation to combat homophobia;