natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalka istočasno meni, da bi morale Komisija in države članice razmisliti o posledicah evropske energetske politike (zlasti prek energetske decentralizacije) na prostorsko načrtovanje, pomembne prometne osi in infrastrukture, ter poudarja, da bi bilo treba spodbujati projekte, ki povezujejo več vrst obnovljivih virov energije, da bi uravnotežili in nadomestili njihovo proizvodnjo, ki je po svojem značaju nestalna.
Your rapporteur also considers that the Commission and Member States should consider the impact which European energy policy will have, particularly through decentralisation of energy, on regional development, major transport routes and major infrastructure; she stresses that projects involving several types of renewable energy should be encouraged in order to balance and compensate for the fact that their production is often intermittent.
Poročevalka se strinja z dolgoročnim ciljem glede omejitve emisij ogljika pri proizvodnji električne energije, in sicer z zamenjavo obstoječih proizvodnih zmogljivosti, zagotovitvijo neodvisnosti prometa od nafte, gradnjo stavb z majhno porabo energije in pozitivno energijsko bilanco ter izgradnjo medsebojno povezanega inteligentnega električnega omrežja.
Your rapporteur endorses the long-term objectives of limiting carbon emissions from electricity generation by replacing existing production capacity, putting an end to dependence of transport on oil, constructing low-energy and positive-energy buildings, and constructing an intelligent, interconnected electricity grid.
Pri tem poudarja, da čeprav ostajajo energijska učinkovitost, varčevanje z energijo in nadaljnji razvoj obnovljivih virov energije prednostna naloga, primanjkljaja energetskih virov ne bo mogoče zapolniti do leta 2030.
She stresses that, while energy efficiency and energy saving remain a priority, as does the continued development of renewable energies, it will not be possible to overcome the energy resource deficit by 2030.
Glede tega meni, da obstaja zelo resno tveganje, da bo po letu 2030 prišlo do pomanjkanja energije na svetovni ravni.
She believes that there is a very serious risk of a world energy shortage from 2030.
Zato v okviru strateškega načrta za energetske tehnologije odobrava izdelavo politične agende za leto 2030 in časovnega načrta za energetsko politiko do leta 2050.
She therefore endorses, as part of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan, the drawing-up of a political agenda for 2030 and a road map for energy policy in 2050.
V ta namen je treba oceniti razvoj sestave virov energije med letoma 2020 in 2050 na podlagi več scenarijev, pri čemer je treba upoštevati razvoj povpraševanja po energiji, potencialnih virov energije, vplivov na okolje ter predvidenih stroškov energije in CO 2 .
This necessitates an assessment of trends in the composition of the energy mix between 2020 and 2050 under several scenarios, taking account of the development of energy demand, potential energy resources, environmental impact, the estimated price of energy and carbon dioxide.
Glede energije prihodnosti opozarja, da je treba nenehno spodbujati raziskave na področju pretvorbe jedrskih odpadkov in jedrske fuzije.
As regards the energy of the future, she recalls the need constantly to encourage research into transmutation of nuclear waste and nuclear fusion.
Poročevalka zahteva, da se časovni načrt za leto 2050 sestavi tako, da bo omogočil usmeritev raziskav in razvoja energetskih tehnologij k zmanjšanju stroškov obnovljivih virov energije, omogočanju shranjevanja energije (predvsem elektrike), uveljavitvi jedrskih reaktorjev četrte generacije in predvsem iskanju alternative za nafto, kar zadeva prevoz, pri čemer mora biti poudarek na možnostih, ki jih ponuja sončna energija.
Your rapporteur calls for the road map for 2050 to make it possible to direct energy technology research and development in order to reduce the cost of renewable energies, to permit energy storage (particularly of electricity), to make a success of fourth-generation nuclear reactors, to find an alternative to oil for transport, and to highlight the potential of solar energy.
o drugem strateškem pregledu energetike
on the Second Strategic Energy Review
Odbor za zunanje zadeve poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. meni, da mora biti Evropa vzor za trajnost in energijsko učinkovitost ter da mora imeti Evropska unija posledično na področju obnovljivih virov energije in energijske učinkovitosti po vsem svetu pionirsko vlogo ter izvažati svoje znanje na tem področju; poudarja potrebo po uporabi tega potenciala zlasti v dvostranskem dialogu z državami v vzponu, kot sta Kitajska in Indija;
Considers that Europe must act as a role model in respect of sustainability and energy efficiency and that the European Union must therefore take a leading role on the issues of renewable energies and energy efficiency worldwide and must export its knowledge and expertise in this field; underlines the need to utilise this potential, especially in the bilateral dialogue with emerging countries such as China and India;
Norveška) ter poudarja pomen razvijajočih se politik za izgradnjo integriranega trga v drugih delih Evrope (npr. jugovzhodna Evropa); verjame, da bo imelo takšno tržno povezovanje pomembno vlogo pri poglobljenem dialogu zlasti z državami proizvajalkami;
Notes with satisfaction cases where there is already regulatory and market integration (e.g. Norway) and underlines the importance of policies under development for the construction of an integrated market in other parts of Europe (e.g. south-east Europe); believes that such market integration will be instrumental in bringing about a deepened dialogue, particularly with producer countries;
7. poziva k pripravi nove generacije določb o „energetski soodvisnosti“ v sporazumih EU z državami proizvajalkami zunaj Evrope, ki bodo obravnavale vprašanja, kot so naložbe in zaščita naložb, razvoj in fizična zaščita infrastrukture, dostop do trgov, dialog o razvoju trga in politiki, sporazumi o tranzitu in določbe o reševanju sporov;
Calls for the development of a new generation of "energy interdependence" provisions in the EU's agreements with producer countries outside Europe, covering issues such as investment and investment protection, the development and physical protection of infrastructure, access to markets, dialogue on developments in market and policy matters, transit agreements and dispute settlement provisions;
9. ugotavlja pomen energetskega dialoga med EU in OPEC ter spodbuja Komisijo, naj okrepi energetski dialog z Norveško; opozarja, da je sodelovanje z državami kaspijske regije še vedno pomembna prednostna naloga;
Notes the importance of the EU-OPEC energy dialogue and encourages the Commission to intensify the energy dialogue with Norway; points out that cooperation with the countries of the Caspian region remains an important priority;
o izvajanju direktive 2006/43/ES o obveznih revizijah za letne in konsolidirane računovodske izkaze
on implementation of Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts
Poročevalec za mnenje(*):
Rapporteur for opinion (*):
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs .................11
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................13
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.............................................................................14
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/43/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o obvezni reviziji letnih in konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazov
– having regard to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0060 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0060 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. oktobra 2008 o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti – 24. letno poročilo Komisije
– having regard to its resolution of 21 October 2008 on monitoring the application of Community law – 24th annual report from the Commission
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0494 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0494 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2005: uporaba načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti – 13. letno poročilo
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on better lawmaking 2005: application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality – 13th report
UL C 187 E, 24.07.08, str.
OJ C 187 E, 24.7.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenja Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0014/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0014/2009 ),
A. ker je Parlament večkrat poudaril, da ima zakonodaja EU smisel samo v primeru, če jo države članice upoštevajo, in ker je zato treba izboljšati spremljanje prenosa in uporabe zakonodaje EU v državah članicah; ker je Parlament predlagal, naj pristojni poročevalec predloži poročilo o napredku po izteku roka za prenos;
A. whereas Parliament has repeatedly stated that there is a point to EU legislation only if it is complied with in the Member States, and whereas monitoring of the transposition and application of EU legislation by Member States must therefore be stepped up; whereas Parliament has proposed that the rapporteur responsible be given a progress report after the transposition deadline has expired,
B. ker sta Parlament in Svet dne 17. maja 2006 sprejela direktivo 2006/43/ES (direktivo) in se je 29. junija 2008 iztekel rok za prenos v državah članicah in ker je treba preveriti, ali je bil prenos izveden pravilno,
B. whereas Directive 2006/43/EC (“the Directive”) was adopted by Parliament and the Council on 17 May 2006 and the period for transposition in the Member States expired on 29 June 2008, and whereas there must be an examination as to whether transposition has proceeded correctly,
C. ker je Komisija objavila pregled napredka, ki sicer opredeljuje, katere člene kdo izvaja, vendar ne podaja informacij o poteku izvajanja in ne navaja, ali nacionalni predpisi dosegajo minimalni standard, ki ga določa direktiva,
C. whereas the “scoreboard” published by the Commission, whilst identifying which articles have been implemented by whom, provides no information on the way in which implementation has proceeded or on whether national rules meet the minimum standard set by the Directive,
D. ker je cilj direktive, prvič, izboljšati kakovost revizij letnih računovodskih izkazov po vsej EU in tako povečati zaupanje v to poročanje in izboljšati stanje na finančnih trgih, in, drugič, vzpostaviti enake pogoje za računovodski sektor na notranjem trgu,
D. whereas the objective of the Directive is, first, to optimise the quality of audits of annual accounts throughout the EU, thus increasing confidence in such reporting and improving the situation in the financial markets, and, second, to establish a level playing-field for the accountancy sector within the internal market,
E. ker je treba preveriti izvajanje direktive v državah članicah glede na oba cilja,
E. whereas implementation of the Directive in Member States must be checked by reference to this twin objective,
Člen 2(13) direktive. in „mreža“
Article 2(13) of the Directive.
4. poudarja, da zadnje izkušnje kažejo, da so potrebni pogosti in kakovostni stiki znotraj revizijskih komisij in med neodvisnimi direktorji, nadzornimi odbori in revizorji ter da bi morali člani neizvršnih odborov pozorno preučiti možnost srečanj, na katerih člani izvršnih odborov ne bi bili navzoči;
Stresses that recent experience shows the need for frequent and high-quality interaction within audit committees and between independent directors, supervisory boards and auditors, and that non-executive board members should consider carefully the possibility of having meetings without executive board members being present;
7. meni, da je zelo pomembno, da se sodelovanje med organi javnega nadzora, ki ga zahteva direktiva, dejansko uresniči, saj tesno sodelovanje med nadzornimi organi pospešuje zbliževanje med državami članicami in lahko prepreči dodatna upravna bremena, ki izhajajo iz različnih nacionalnih postopkov in zahtev;
Considers it very important that the cooperation required under the Directive between public-oversight authorities should actually materialise, since intensive cooperation between oversight authorities fosters convergence between Member States and can prevent additional administrative burdens resulting from different national procedures and requirements;
10. poziva Komisijo, naj skrbno oceni vso nacionalno zakonodajo, ki prenaša direktivo, se odločno loti težav, opisanih v odstavkih od 1 do 5, in v roku 2 let o tem poroča Parlamentu; dvomi, ali je izbrani pristop minimalne uskladitve res prava pot k uresničitvi ciljev te in drugih direktiv, ki zadevajo notranji trg, saj bodo številna odstopanja, ki jih dovoljuje direktiva, povzročila nadaljnjo drobitev računovodskega trga; poziva Komisijo, naj med usklajevanjem poskrbi za jasne koncepte;
Calls on the Commission to make a careful evaluation of all national legislation transposing the Directive, to tackle resolutely the problems referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5 and to report to Parliament on this within two years; doubts whether the chosen method of minimum harmonisation is really the right way to realise the objectives of this and other internal-market-related directives, since the many derogations allowed by the Directive will lead to further fragmentation of the accountancy market; calls on the Commission to make use of clear concepts when harmonisation is being carried out;
12. meni, da je temeljito spremljanje in preverjanje pravilnega in pravočasnega izvajanja zakonodaje EU ključno sredstvo za boljšo uporabo zakonodaje EU in izogibanje praksi prekomernega normativnega urejanja, ki se lahko pojavi na primer na podlagi člena 40 direktive, ki določa neizčrpen seznam zahtev za pregledno poročanje;
Takes the view that careful monitoring and verification of the correct and timely implementation of EU legislation is an essential means of achieving better application of EU law and avoiding gold-plating practices that may occur on the basis of, for example, Article 40 of the Directive, which lays down a non-exhaustive list of requirements for transparency reporting;
14. odločno poudarja, da se vsak „kvazi-zakonodajni“ ukrep v okviru direktive lahko sprejme le z uporabo regulativnega postopka s pregledom, ki ga po potrebi spremlja ocena učinka ukrepa;
Strongly emphasises that any quasi-legislative measure within the scope of the Directive can only be adopted pursuant to the application of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, accompanied where appropriate by an evaluation of its impact;
Priporočilo o zagotavljanju kakovosti
Recommendation on quality assurance
UL L 120, 07.05.08, str.
OJ L 120, 7.5.2008, p.
20. ; podpira uveljavljeno mnenje, da je pomembno, da so neodvisni zunanji pregledi zagotavljanja kakovosti skladni s ciljem direktive glede izboljšanja kakovosti revizij in verodostojnosti objavljenih finančnih podatkov; poleg tega odobrava uveljavljeno mnenje, da je popolna neodvisnost in nepristranskost inšpekcij in inšpektorjev izjemnega pomena;
20. ; subscribes to the established view that it is important to have independent external quality assurance reviews in line with the Directive's objective of enhancing the quality of audits and the credibility of published financial information; endorses, moreover, the established view that the total independence and impartiality of inspections and inspectors are of the utmost importance;
Sklep o registraciji revizorjev tretjih držav
Decision on the registration of third-country auditors
UL L 202, 31.07.08, str.
OJ L 202, 31.7.2008, p.
70. ; poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament obvesti o nadaljnjem ukrepanju v zvezi v vprašanjem registracije revizorjev tretjih držav;
70. ; asks the Commission to communicate to Parliament its follow-up on the question of the registration of third-county auditors;
18. ugotavlja, da lahko razlike med režimi odgovornosti v državah članicah privedejo do regulatorne arbitraže in spodkopavajo notranji trg, vendar se zaveda različnih stopenj izpostavljenosti, povezanih z velikostjo revizijskih podjetij in družb, ki jih obravnavajo; poudarja, da odškodninski zahtevki pogosto prihajajo iz tretjih držav, kjer so podlaga za spore največkrat dogovori o odvetniškem honorarju v določenem odstotku od dosežene odškodnine; ni naklonjen taki kulturi pravnih sporov v Evropski uniji in poziva k bolj temeljnemu reševanju škodljivih vplivov takih praks, katerih gonilo so provizije;
Notes that divergences between Member States' liability regimes might lead to regulatory arbitrage and undermine the internal market, but is aware of the differing levels of exposure linked to the size of audit firms and companies with which they deal; emphasises that liability claims often come from third countries in which such litigation is largely driven by contingency-fee arrangements; is reluctant to welcome such a litigation culture into the European Union and asks for a more fundamental resolution to the perverse effects of such fee-driven practices;
UL L 162, 21.06.08, str.
OJ L 162, 21.6.2008, p.
39. , po katerem naj države članice odgovornost računovodij omejijo glede na domače predpise in okoliščine; poleg tega opozarja na cilj priporočila, ki je doseči večjo konvergenco med državami članicami na tem področju, s tem pa spodbuditi enake pogoje za podjetja in računovodska podjetja; poudarja, da cilj omejevanja odgovornosti računovodij in računovodskih podjetij, kot je naveden v priporočilu Komisije, ne sme kršiti načel, ki v nekaterih državah članicah veljajo za civilno odgovornost, kot je načelo pravice do odškodnine za žrtve; poudarja, da priporočilo v kontekstu sedanje gospodarske in finančne krize ne bi smelo pod vprašaj postaviti kakovosti obvezne revizije ali zaupanja v njeno funkcijo; poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament najkasneje leta 2010 obvesti o učinku priporočila ter nadaljnjih ukrepih, pri čemer naj največjo pozornost nameni zlasti vprašanju, ali in v kakšni meri vpliva na večjo konvergenco med državami članicami, skladno s ciljem direktive; poudarja, da bo morala Komisija – če se bo izkazalo, da so potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi – izdelati oceno učinka, v kateri bo proučila možne posledice omejevanja civilne odgovornosti revizorjev in revizijskih podjetij na kakovost revizij, finančno varnost in koncentracijo na računovodskem trgu;
39. , which calls on Member States to limit the liability of accountants, with due regard for their own national legislation and circumstances; further notes the recommendation's objective of bolstering the level-playing field for undertakings and accountancy firms through greater convergence between Member States in this area; underlines that the objective of limiting the liability of auditors and audit firms proposed by the Commission recommendation must not violate the legal principles governing civil liability in certain Member States, such as the principle of the right to compensation for victims; underlines that, within the context of the current economic and financial crisis, the recommendation should not call into question the quality of the statutory audit or the confidence placed in the function of statutory audits; calls on the Commission to inform Parliament no later than in 2010 about the impact of, and the follow-up to, the recommendation, the important issue in this connection being, in particular, whether and to what extent, in accordance with the Directive’s objective, the recommendation is leading to greater convergence between Member States; emphasises that, in the event that further measures prove necessary, the Commission must undertake an impact study assessing the possible effects of limitation of civil liability of auditors and audit firms on the quality of audits, financial security and the concentration on the audit market;
Posvetovanje o lastninskih pravicah
Consultation on ownership rules
Evropski parlament je glede na svojo vlogo sozakonodajalca zelo zainteresiran za izvajanje direktive v državah članicah.
By virtue of its role as co-legislator the European Parliament has a great interest in the implementation of the Directive in the Member States.
Zato bo Evropski parlament bolj formalno vključen v proces spremljanja izvajanja evropske zakonodaje v državah članicah s poročanjem o prenosu pomembne zakonodaje EU.
Therefore, the European Parliament will be more formally involved in the monitoring process of the implementation of European legislation in the Member States by reporting on the transposition of important EU legislation.
9. septembra 2008 je potekala predstavitev, na kateri so specializirani strokovnjaki zainteresiranih strani obravnavali najnovejša vprašanja postopka izvajanja.
On 9 September 2008, a hearing was held in which stakeholder experts elaborated on the latest issues in the process of implementation.
V tem poročilu, ki ocenjuje izvajanje v državah članicah, želi poročevalec spremljati in poročati, v kolikšni meri so bili izpolnjeni ali se pričakuje, da bodo izpolnjeni cilji direktive.
In this report, evaluating the implementation in Member States, the rapporteur wishes to monitor and report in how far the goals of the Directive have been met or are expected to be met.
Osrednje vprašanje je, ali izvedbeni ukrepi držav članic v največji možni meri povečujejo kakovost revizij in ali vzpostavljajo enake pogoje za revizijski sektor.
Central question is if the Member States implementation measures maximize the quality of audits and if they reach a level playing field for the audit sector.
Pojem subjekt javnega interesa se v državah članicah razlaga in izvaja različno.
The implementation of the definition of Public Interest Entity leads to differences in interpretation between Member States.
Številne dodatne obveznosti so neposredno povezane z opredelitvijo pojma subjekt javnega interesa, na primer zahteve po ustanovitvi revizijske komisije za subjekte javnega interesa.
Several additional obligations are directly linked with the definition of PIE, for instance the requirement of PIEs to establish an audit committee.
Revizorji subjektov javnega interesa morajo poleg tega objavljati letna pregledna poročila, zanje pa velja tudi strožji inšpekcijski režim kot za ostale revizorje.
Auditors of PIEs are moreover required to publish annual transparency reports and are subject to a stricter inspection regime than other auditors.
Zato je ključnega pomena, da si Komisija skupaj z državami članicami prizadeva za nedvoumno izvajanje opredelitve pojma subjekt javnega interesa v vseh državah članicah.
It is therefore essential that the Commission together with the Member States strive for an unequivocal implementation of the definition of PIE in all Member States.
Izvajanje opredelitve pojma mreža vodi do različnih nacionalnih pravnih predpisov.
The implementation of the definition of network leads to divergent national legislative provisions.
Predvidene so dodatne zahteve, ki so neposredno povezane s podjetji, ki pripadajo mreži, na primer opredelitev mreže za registracijo podjetja v različnih državah članicah.
There are additional requirements directly linked to firms that belong to a network, for example the identification of the network for registration of a firm in different Member States.
Direktiva obvezuje revizijska podjetja, da pri zahtevku za registracijo v državi članici navedejo, ali so del mreže, in mrežo opredelijo.
The Directive obliges audit firms, when applying for registration in a Member State, to indicate if they form part of a network, and identify the network.