natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V predloženem poročilu je jasno izraženo mnenje Evropskega parlamenta, da so sistemi zajamčenih vlog pomemben sestavni del našega sistema finančnih trgov in je treba njihovo delovanje stalno izboljševati.
The European Parliament intends, by means of this report, to make it clear that deposit-guarantee schemes are considered to be an important part of our financial market system, and that their operation should continuously be improved.
Poleg minimalnega kritja in skrajšanja postopkov zaradi boljših možnosti, ki jih ponuja nova komunikacijska tehnologija, poročilo obravnava predvsem krizno upravljanje.
The report considers questions concerning the minimum guarantee level and a tightening of procedures by taking advantage of improved communications technology, and focuses on the issue of crisis management.
Sistemi zajamčenih vlog so zlasti zaradi vse tesnejše povezanosti trgov soočeni z novimi izzivi, s katerimi se je treba spopasti, da se zagotovi stabilnost finančnega trga.
Guarantee schemes are now being faced with more demands, particularly as a result of increasing market integration, and these must be responded to if the stability of financial markets is to be ensured.
Evropski parlament v poročilu poziva, da se na področju sistemov zajamčenih vlog doseže združitev v en sistem čezmejnega kriznega upravljanja, in v zvezi s tem podpira prizadevanje delovnih skupin Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora in Odbora za finančne storitve pri obravnavanju zadevnih vprašanj.
Parliament also calls, by means of the report, for integration with cross-border crisis management in the area of deposit guaranteeing and in this context supports the involvement of working groups from the Economic and Finance Committee and the Financial Services Committee with regard to relevant issues.
Poleg tega Evropski parlament meni, da mora krizno upravljanje temeljiti na naslednjih stebrih: boljšem zgodnjem odkrivanju tveganja, bolje opredeljenih in načrtovanih postopkih sodelovanja vseh udeležencev ter pojasnitvi, kdaj se breme razdeli.
The European Parliament considers that crisis management should rest on the foundations of improved early risk detection, better defined and planned procedures of interaction between all parties involved, and clarification of the point at which burdens are to be shared.
Pri tem je treba upoštevati razlike med sistemi in raznolikost udeležencev na javnem in zasebnem področju.
Differences between systems and the variety of parties involved in the public and private sectors must be taken into consideration.
V zvezi s tem je treba tudi pojasniti, da morajo biti za omejitev tveganja še naprej odgovorne zlasti banke.
In this context it must also be made clear that the principal responsibility for risk limitation must remain with the banks.
Mariela Veličkova Baeva, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Slavi Binev, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Ieke van den Burg, Christian Ehler, Jonathan Evans, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Donata Gottardi, Benoît Hamon, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Andrea Losco, Gay Mitchell, Cristobal Montoro Romero, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Manuel António dos Santos, Olle Schmidt, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Sahra Wagenknecht
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Slavi Binev, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Ieke van den Burg, Christian Ehler, Jonathan Evans, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Donata Gottardi, Benoît Hamon, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Andrea Losco, Gay Mitchell, Cristobal Montoro Romero, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Manuel António dos Santos, Olle Schmidt, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Sahra Wagenknecht
o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Renata Brunette
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Renato Brunetta
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Renata Brunette za zaščito njegove imunitete v zvezi s civilnim postopkom, ki je bil sprožen proti njemu pred okrožnim sodiščem v Milanu, z dne 18. januarja 2007, razglašene na plenarnem zasedanju 31. januarja 2007,
– having regard to the request by Renato Brunetta for defence of his immunity in connection with civil proceedings brought against him before the District Court in Milan, of 18 January 2007, announced in plenary sitting on 31 January 2007,
– po zaslišanju Renata Brunette v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Renato Brunetta in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju člena 9 in člena 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 in člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju členov 6(3) in 7 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6–0449/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0449/2007 ),
Na zasedanju 31. januarja 2007 je predsednik Parlamenta razglasil, da je prejel pismo z dne 18. januarja 2007 z zahtevo za zaščito imunitete poslanca Renata Brunette, ki je bilo posredovano Odboru za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 6(3) Poslovnika.
At the sitting of 31 January 2007, the President of Parliament announced that he had received a request for the defence of the parliamentary immunity of Renato Brunetta by letter of 18 January 2007, which was forwarded to the Committee on Legal Affairs, pursuant to Rule 6(3) of the Rules of Procedure.
Zahteva se nanaša na civilni postopek, ki ga je proti Renatu Brunetti in drugim obtožencem sprožila družba Hera S.p.A. ter trenutno poteka pred okrožnim sodiščem v Milanu.
The request relates to the civil proceedings brought by Hera S.p.A. against Mr Brunetta, along with other defendants, and currently pending before the District Court of Milan.
Hera S.p.A. je italijanska holdinška družba, ki deluje na področju javnih služb v regiji Emilia-Romagna.
Hera S.p.A. is an Italian holding company operating in the field of public utilities in the Emilia-Romagna region.
Gre za javno-zasebno družbo, v kateri skupina tamkajšnjih občin nadzira 59 % delnic, preostalih 41 % pa je v lasti skupine (javnih) bančnih ustanov in zadružnih podjetij.
It is a public-private company whose 59% of shares is controlled by a group of local municipalities and the remaining 41% belongs to a group of (public) bank foundations and cooperative firms.
Z odločbo sodišča z dne 14. septembra 2006 je Hera S.p.A. pozvala Renata Brunetto in druge obtožence, da se pojavijo pred oddelkom CLES okrožnega sodišča v Trentu, da bi jih pozneje lahko razglasila za skupno odgovorne za gradivo, objavljeno v knjigi z naslovom „Rdeči kapitalizem – Preiskovanje zadrug – od delnic do špekulacij“ ( Red Capitalism - Investigating The Cooperatives, From Shares To Speculation ), ki je del zbirke „Dokumenti panorame“ ( I documenti di Panorama ).
By the writ of pleadings of 14 September 2006, Hera S.p.A summoned Renato Brunetta and other defendants to appear before the Cles section of the Trento District Court, so that the latter might declare them jointly liable for the material published in a book forming part of the " I documenti di Panorama" series, entitled 'Red Capitalism - Investigating The Cooperatives, From Shares To Speculation' .
Ta knjiga – izdala jo je založba Mondadori (eno najpomembnejših italijanskih založniških podjetij) skupaj s fundacijo FREE (Fundacija za raziskave o evropskem gospodarstvu) in je izšla kot priloga tednika Panorama št. 7 z dne 10. februarja 2006 – je domnevno obrekljiva do družbe Hera, ki je zaprosila sodišče, naj obtoženim naloži, da skupaj povrnejo vso povzročeno materialno in moralno škodo, poleg dodatne škode, ki je določena s členom 12 zakona 47/1949, tako da izplačajo 550 000 EUR ter krijejo vse pravno določene obresti in revalorizacije te vsote, poleg tega pa na lastne stroške tudi objavijo sodbo ali povzetek sodbe v časopisih Voce di Rimini in Corriere della Sera ter reviji Panorama .
That book - which had been published by Mondadori (one of the most important Italian publishing companies) together with FREE (Foundation for Research on European Economy) and had been issued as a supplement to the Panorama weekly magazine issue No. 7, of 10 February 2006 - was allegedly defamatory of Hera, which asked the court to order to the defendants, jointly, to compensate for all the material and moral damage caused, in addition to the further damage for which provision is made of Article 12 of Law No 47/1949, by making a payment of EUR 550 000, plus any legally defined interests and revaluation of the sum, in addition to publishing at their expense the judgment or an extract thereof in the Voce di Rimini and Corriere della Sera newspapers and Panorama magazine.
Vsi obtoženi so se odzvali povabilu sodišča in izpodbijali utemeljitve tožnikovih zahtev ter vložili predhodni ugovor o krajevni nepristojnosti sodišča, ki vodi postopek.
All the defendants duly filed an appearance before the court, challenging the justification for the requests made by the complainant and submitting the preliminary objection that the court seized had no local jurisdiction.
Na zaslišanju dne 20. februarja 2007 je tožnik sprejel ugovor o nepristojnosti sodišča ter priznal pristojnost okrožnega sodišča v Milanu in 19. marca 2007 obtožene z izjavo obvestil o nadaljevanju postopka pred tem sodiščem.
At the hearing of 20 February 2007, the complainant accepted the plea of lack of jurisdiction and, recognising the jurisdiction of the Milan District Court, on 19 March 2007 notified the defendants a statement on resumption of proceedings before that court.
V svojem pozivu pred sodišče je družba Hera kot primere obrekljivih izjav podala naslednje odlomke iz omenjene knjige, ki so povzeti iz uvoda, katerega je napisal Renato Brunetta.
In its writ of summons, Hera gave the following extracts of the abovementioned book, taken from the introduction written by Mr Brunetta, as examples of defamatory statements:
– „Na podlagi teh izsledkov se bomo ukvarjali z razlogi, zaradi katerih so pomembni sektorji zadružnega gibanja, povezani s stranko levih demokratov, pripomogli pri nastanku „rdečega kapitalizma“, degeneriranja zadružnega gibanja v strankarsko gibanje.
- 'On the basis of these findings, we shall address the reasons which have led to important sectors of the cooperative movement with links to the Left Democrats becoming implemental in the emergence of 'red capitalism', the degeneration of the cooperative economy into a partisan movement.
Skratka v pošast“ (stran 6);
In a word, a monster' (page 6);
– Nedavni dogodki, povezani z banko Unipol, in drugi, ki jih opisuje ta knjiga, kažejo, da so največje žrtve zadrug, ki so ušle nadzoru, njihovi člani.
- The recent events involving Unipol, and others described in the course of this book, show that the main victims of the cooperatives which have spun out of control are their members.
Ko se zadruga razširi preko določene velikosti, imajo njeni člani, za razliko od delničarjev v delniških družbah, malo – ali nimajo nobenih – pristojnosti za učinkovit nadzor uprave.
When a cooperative expands beyond a certain size, its members, unlike shareholders in public limited liability companies, have few - or no - powers to effectively control management.
Posledično uprava, ki je ne nadzirajo lastniki kapitala, postane samo-referenčna in se obnaša popolnoma enako kot špekulant, brez tveganj, ki jih nosijo špekulanti, ter izkorišča odsotnost običajnega nazora in postopkov, da prikrije svoje strategije in pred svojimi člani skrije koristi, vključno z osebnimi koristmi ki jih lahko pridobi“ (stran 15);
Consequently, the management, which is not subject to control by those owning the capital, becomes self-referential, behaves exactly like a speculator without the risks incurred by speculators, and takes advantage of the absence of the usual controls and practices to conceal its own strategies and hide from its members the benefits - including personal benefits - it can obtain' (page 15);
– „"Rdeči kapitalizem" je del prizadevanj fundacije FREE, da bi razgalila tehnike "skritih članov" "rdečih" zadrug in obnovila izvirna pravila in razloge obstoja zadružnega gibanja“ (stran 15);
- 'Red capitalism' is part of FREE's efforts to denounce the "red" cooperatives' "hidden member" technique and restore the original rules and raison d'être of the cooperative movement' (page 15);
– „"Rdeči kapitalizem" fundacije FREE kaže, da so bila pravila o konkurenčnosti spremenjena in da je politična stranka kot "skriti član" prevzela nadzor nad zadrugami“ (stran 15).
- 'FREE's "Red capitalism" shows that competition rules have been altered and a political party has taken control of the cooperatives as a "hidden member"' (page 15).
Člena 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965 določata naslednje:
Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965, read as follows:
Med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi člani uživajo:
During the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members shall enjoy:
Kadar je poslanec zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja, sklicevanje na imuniteto ni mogoče in Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu poslancu.
Immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is found in the act of committing an offence and shall not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members.
Člen 6 – Odvzem imunitete:
Rule 6 - Waiver of immunity:
Člen 7 – Postopki v zvezi z imuniteto:
Rule 7 - Procedure on immunity:
Člen 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah določa, da poslanec Evropskega parlamenta uživa popolno imuniteto pred sodnimi postopki „zaradi mnenja ..., ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti“.
Article 9 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities provides that Members of the European Parliament have absolute immunity from legal proceedings " in respect of opinions expressed ... in the performance of their duties ".
Dejansko je v tej izjavi, ki je navedena v pozivu pred sodišče, ki ga je zahtevalo podjetje Hera S.p.A., Renato Brunetta le komentiral dejstva, ki so že bila dostopna javnosti in so imela evropsko politično razsežnost, saj so bila neposredno povezana s ponudbo Unipola za prevzem banke Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL), Evropska komisija pa je izvajala nadzor, ki ga določa pravo Skupnosti, glede zakonitosti prevzemne ponudbe.
As a matter of fact, in his statements reported by the writ of summons filed by Hera S.p.A., Mr Brunetta merely commented on facts in the public domain which had a European political dimension as they were directly linked to Unipol’s bid to take over the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) and the European Commission was carrying out the checks required under Community law with regard to the legality of that takeover bid.
Poleg tega je Renato Brunetta kot član Evropskega parlamenta in redni profesor ekonomije zgolj poudaril tržne pomanjkljivosti, ki so posledica obstoječih povezav med javno–zasebnimi podjetji, zadrugami in političnimi strankami, kar dejansko ustvarja monopol in torej lahko ogrozi delovanje notranjega trga kar zadeva varstvo potrošnikov in pošteno konkurenco.
Furthermore, as a Member of the European Parliament and full professor of Economics, Mr Brunetta only stressed the market failure resulting from to the links existing between public-private companies, cooperatives and political parties which create a de facto monopoly and may therefore jeopardise the functioning of the internal market as far as consumers' protection and fair competition are concerned.
Primer podjetja Hera S.p.A. je bil zgolj paradigmatski primer tega, kako to gospodarsko protislovje obstaja in deluje.
The case of Hera S.p.A. was just a paradigmatic example of how this economic paradox exists and works.
Opredelitev takšnih razmer kot „gospodarsko pošast“ sploh ni obrekovanje, saj uporabljeni izraz „monstrum“ izhaja iz latinščine, kjer pomeni zgolj „izredno“, „protinaravno“.
Defining such a situation as an "economic monster" is not at all defamatory, as the word " monster " comes from the Latin expression " monstrum " which only means "extraordinary", "something against nature".
Sporočilo, ki ga je Renato Brunetta nameraval posredovati svojim bralcem, ni bilo nič več kot opis, zgolj z ekonomskega stališča, obstoječih nepravilnosti na italijanskem trgu, za katere se zdi, da Italiji preprečujejo v celoti izpolniti cilje notranjega trga.
The message that Mr Brunetta intended to give to his readers was nothing more than the description, from a merely economic point of view, of the existing anomalies of the Italian market, which seem to prevent Italy from fully attaining the objectives of the internal market.
Z opisovanjem in kritiko odklonov zadružnega sistema je le opravljal dolžnost poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, saj je svojim volivcem izražal svoje mnenje o zadevi javnega interesa.
In describing and criticising the deviations of the cooperatives' system, he was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament in expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents.
Skratka, Renato Brunetta je le opravljal svoje delo kot poslanec Evropskega parlamenta.
In short, Mr Brunetta was simply doing his job as a Member of Parliament.
Poskusi, da se poslance Evropskega parlamenta utiša pri izražanju svojih mnenj o zadevah, za katere obstajata legitimni javni interes in zaskrbljenost, tako, da se proti njim sproži sodne postopke, so v demokratični družbi nesprejemljivi in očitno kršijo člen 9 Protokola, katerega namen je varovati svobodo izražanja poslancev pri izvrševanju njihovih dolžnosti v interesu Parlamenta kot institucije.
To seek to gag Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern by bringing legal proceedings is unacceptable in a democratic society and manifestly in breach of Article 9 of the Protocol, which is intended to protect Members' freedom of expression in the performance of their duties in the interests of Parliament as an Institution.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti zaščiti imunitete, Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament zaščiti poslansko imuniteto Renata Brunette.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Renato Brunetta be defended.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi prava v pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih (Rim I)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................40
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............44
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0650 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0650 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 61(c) in 67(5) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0441/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 61(c) and 67(5) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0441/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6‑0450/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0450/2007 ),
(1) Evropska unija si je zastavila cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
(1) The Union has set itself the objective of establishing an area of freedom, security and justice.
V ta namen mora Skupnost zlasti sprejeti ukrepe na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami, kolikor so potrebni za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga, in ki spodbujajo združljivost pravil, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah glede izbire prava .
To that end the Community must adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters with a cross-border impact to the extent necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market, including measures promoting the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning the conflict of laws.
(1) Skupnost si je zadala cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
(1) The Community has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
Za postopno vzpostavitev takšnega območja bi morala Skupnost sprejeti ukrepe, povezane s pravosodnim sodelovanjem v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami, in sicer v obsegu, v kakršnem so potrebni za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
For the progressive establishment of such an area, the Community is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters with a cross-border impact to the extent necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
(1a) V skladu s členom 65(b) Pogodbe morajo ti ukrepi vključevati tudi ukrepe, ki spodbujajo združljivost pravil, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah v primerih kolizije zakonov in sporov o pristojnosti.
(1a) According to Article 65, point (b) of the Treaty, these measures are to include those promoting the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning the conflict of laws and of jurisdiction.
(2) Za učinkovito izvajanje ustreznih določb Amsterdamske pogodbe je Svet za pravosodje in notranje zadeve 3. decembra 1998 sprejel akcijski načrt o tem, kako najbolje izvesti določbe Amsterdamske pogodbe o območju svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki poudarja pomen združljivosti pravil o izbiri prava pri doseganju cilja vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb, in pozval k temu, da se po potrebi spremenijo nekatere določbe Konvencije o uporabi prava v pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih ob upoštevanju posebnih določb o pravilih o izbiri prava v drugih instrumentih Skupnosti.
(2) For the purposes of effectively implementing the relevant provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty, the Council (Justice and Home Affairs) on 3 December 1998 adopted a plan of action on how best to implement the provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam on an area of freedom, security and justice, stressing the importance of promoting the compatibility of conflict-of-law rules in order to attain the objective of mutual recognition of judgments and calling for the revision, where necessary, of certain provisions of the Convention on the Law applicable to contractual obligations, taking into account special provisions on conflict-of-law rules in other Community instruments.
(3) Evropski svet je na svojem srečanju v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 potrdil načelo vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb kot prednostne naloge za vzpostavitev evropskega pravosodnega prostora .
(3) The Tampere European Council on 15 and 16 October 1999 approved the principle of mutual recognition of judgments as a priority matter in the establishment of a European judicial area.
Program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah opredeljuje, da so ukrepi za usklajevanje pravil o izbiri prava spremljevalni ukrepi, ki olajšujejo izvajanje tega načela.
The programme of measures for implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in civil and commercial matters specifies that the accompanying measures relating to harmonisation of conflict-of-law rules actually do help facilitate the mutual recognition of judgments.