natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Uspešnim kandidatom bo ponujeno delovno razmerje iz člena 2(a) pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Skupnosti, določenih v Uredbi (EGS, Euratom, ESPJ) št. 259/68.
Successful candidates will be offered a contract under Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the Communities laid down in Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68.
V ta namen bo po posvetovanju z Evropskim uradom za izbor osebja organ za sklepanje pogodb v dveh letih po datumu začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa uvedel notranji izbirni postopek, ki bo omejen na osebje, ki ga je Europol zaposlil pred datumom začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa, da se preverijo pristojnosti, učinkovitost in vključenost tega osebja.
To that end , after consultation of the European Personnel Selection Office, an internal selection process limited to staff employed by Europol before the date of application of this Decision will be established within two years after the date of application of this Decision by the authority authorised to conclude contracts in order to check the competence, efficiency and integrity of those to be engaged.
Izbirni postopek spremlja Komisija.
This selection process shall be monitored by the Commission.
Izid postopka se objavi.
The outcome of this selection process shall be made public.
V osnutku kadrovskega načrta, ki se posreduje proračunskemu organu skupaj s predhodnim predlogom proračuna Evropske unije, so jasno navedena delovna mesta, ki jih zaseda osebje, zaposleno v skladu s kadrovskimi predpisi za uradnike in pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti, ter delovna mesta, ki jih zaseda osebje, zaposleno v skladu s kadrovskimi predpisi Europola.
The draft establishment plan forwarded to the budgetary authority together with the preliminary draft budget of the European Union shall clearly indicate the posts filled by staff employed under the Staff Regulations of officials and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities, and the posts filled by staff employed under the Europol Staff Regulations.
Notranji izbirni proces mora potekati v sodelovanju z Evropskim uradom za izbor osebja, ki ima bogate izkušnje z zaposlovanjem v institucijah Evropske unije in lahko zagotovi strokovne standarde za izbor osebja.
The internal selection process should be accompanied by the European Personnel Selection Office which, being the expert for EU recruitment, should guarantee professional personnel selection standards.
Število osebja, ki bo še vedno zaposleno v skladu s kadrovskimi pravili Europola, bo verjetno vplivalo na celotne izdatke za plače, zato mora biti proračunski organ redno obveščen o razmerju med obema skupinama osebja Europola, torej med osebjem, ki dela v skladu s pravili Evropske skupnosti, in tistim, ki dela v skladu s pogoji starega Europola.
Since the number of staff choosing to continue to work under the Europol Staff Regulations may have an effect on the overall staff costs of the agency, the budgetary authority should be kept informed about the ratio between the two groups of Europol personnel, those working under European Community rules and those working under the old Europol conditions .
Člen 57, odstavek 3, pododstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 57, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 a (new)
Subvencija Skupnosti za Europol, kot je določena v tem sklepu, ne bo v nobenem primeru uporabljena za plačilo izdatkov, povezanih z obvezami Europola v skladu s konvencijo o Europolu, pred začetkom veljavnosti tega sklepa.
Under no circumstances shall the Community subsidy for Europol, as established by this Decision, be used to honour expenditure relating to commitments made by Europol in accordance with the Europol Convention, before this Decision is applicable.
Obveze Europola, ki izhajajo iz njegovega starega pravnega režima (konvencija o Europolu), krijejo države članice.
All commitments made by Europol under its old legal regime, the Europol Convention, shall be covered by the Member States.
Če se želi Europol odzvati na spreminjajoče se okoliščine v Evropski uniji, nove oblike kaznivih dejanj in nove teroristične grožnje, bo moral razširiti svoje pristojnosti in spremeniti način delovanja tako, da bo izboljšal prožnost svojih mehanizmov.
If it is to respond to changing circumstances within the European Union, to new forms of crime and to new terrorist threats, Europol will have to extend its powers and alter its modus operandi by introducing greater flexibility into its mechanisms.
Vendar sedanji pravni okvir Europola zelo močno ovira vse postopke za posodobitev ali spremembo pristojnosti.
However, Europol's current legal framework greatly impedes any process intended to update or modify powers.
Od leta 2000 do leta 2003 so bili sprejeti trije protokoli o spremembi Konvencije o Europolu, ki bodo začeli veljati 29. marca in 18. aprila 2007, tj. štiri, pet in sedem let po sprejetju.
Between 2000 and 2003, three protocols amending the Europol Convention were adopted and they will come into force on 29 March and 18 April 2007 - i.e. four, five and seven years after being adopted.
Iz tega je razvidno, da je postopek zapleten in zelo dolg.
This shows that the procedure is a complicated and particularly lengthy one.
Z začetkom veljavnosti amsterdamske pogodbe so bili institucijam zagotovljeni novi pravni mehanizmi, ki so bili prožnejši in bolj prilagodljivi spreminjajočim se okoliščinam, v katerih se je znašla EU.
The entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty provided the institutions with new legal mechanisms which were more flexible and more adaptable to the changing circumstances in which the EU found itself.
Gre za sklepe in okvirne sklepe iz tretjega stebra, za katere ratifikacija držav članic ni potrebna.
The mechanisms are the third-pillar decisions and framework decisions which do not need to be ratified by each Member State.
Parlament je na pravni podlagi člena 34(2) Pogodbe EU večkrat pozval k spremembi Konvencije o Europolu z navedenimi novimi mehanizmi.
On the legal basis provided by Article 34(2) of the EU Treaty, Parliament has repeatedly called for the Europol Convention to be amended by means of the new mechanisms mentioned above.
Predlog sklepa Sveta določa, da se Europol preoblikuje v agencijo EU, kar bo imelo dve posledici: finančna sredstva se bodo morala zagotoviti iz proračuna Skupnosti in osebje Europola bo dobilo status uradnikov ES.
The proposal for a Council decision provides for the conversion of Europol into an EU agency, which will have two consequences: funding will have to be provided from the Community budget and Europol staff will acquire the status of EC officials.
Po novih določbah evropski policijski urad ne bo omejen zgolj na posredovanje proti organiziranemu kriminalu.
Under the new rules the Police Office will not be restricted to intervention against organised crime.
To je pomembna sprememba, saj se bo področje delovanja Europola razširilo na še druge vrste hudih kaznivih dejanj, ki ne spadajo pod organiziran kriminal.
This is a significant change, since it involves extending Europol's scope to encompass other types of serious offence committed outside the sphere of organised crime.
Predlog vsebuje določbe o usklajevanju, organizaciji in vodenju preiskav in operativnih dejavnosti, ki se izvajajo skupaj s pristojnimi organi držav članic oziroma jih izvajajo skupne preiskovalne enote.
The proposal contains provisions for the coordination, organisation and implementation of investigations and operational activities carried out in conjunction with the Member States' relevant authorities or by joint investigative teams.
Poročevalec pozdravlja dejstvo, da bo Europol lahko sprožil preiskave glede pranja denarja ali pozval države članice k izvedbi nekaterih preiskav.
The rapporteur welcomes the fact that Europol will be able to initiate action relating to money-laundering and to ask the Member States to launch certain investigations.
Pozitivno je treba oceniti tudi vključitev določb o dostopu do Europolovih dokumentov v skladu z Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1049/2001.
The fact that the proposal incorporates the provisions relating to access to Europol documents pursuant to European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 is to be applauded.
Kljub temu poročevalec meni, da so spremembe potrebne v zvezi z demokratičnim nadzorom nad Europolom in varovanjem podatkov.
However, the rapporteur considers that certain amendments should be made in areas including data-protection and democratic control over Europol.
Temeljito je treba preučiti možnost pridobivanja podatkov od zasebnih subjektov, saj ni nujno, da bodo takšni podatki pridobljeni varno in zanesljivo, zato je treba vsak primer obravnavati posebej in uvesti dodatne zaščitne ukrepe (vključno s sodnim nadzorom).
The possibility of obtaining data from private entities calls for a great deal of thought, since such data may not have been obtained by safe, reliable means, for which reason cases must be considered individually and additional safeguards (including judicial review) must be introduced.
Kar zadeva obdelovo podatkov, je treba določiti takšno obdobje za ugotavljanje, ali so ti podatki pomembni za izvajanje nalog Europola ali ne, v katerem bo njihovo vrednotenje lahko izvedeno brez ogrožanja osebnih pravic.
As regards the processing of data with a view to determining whether or not they are relevant to Europol tasks, a reasonable period of time must be established within which those data may be assessed without risk to individual rights.
Pri izmenjavi podatkov z drugimi organi Skupnosti je treba zagotoviti, da se policijski urad ne obravnava kot organizacija tretje države, če se na koncu izkaže, da Europol ne more biti organ Skupnosti.
Where the exchange of data with other Community bodes is concerned, it must be ensured - if Europol is ultimately unable to take the form of a Community body - that the Police Office is not treated like an organisation belonging to a third country.
Zato je prav, da se zaradi skladnosti v besedilo uvede določba o uporabi člena 7 uredbe št. 45/2001.
A reference must be included to the effect that Article 7 of Regulation No 45/2001 will be applied for the purpose of ensuring uniformity.
Zelo pozitivna novost je, da se znotraj Europola imenuje neodvisni pooblaščenec za varstvo podatkov, čeprav so potrebna še dodatna jamstva za njegovo dejansko neodvisnost.
The creation of an independent Ombudsman to protect Europol data is a very wise move - although additional guarantees will have to be provided in order to safeguard his independence.
To bo pozitivno prispevalo k večjemu zaupanju organov držav članic v Europol.
The Ombudsman responsible for data-projection will make a positive contribution to increasing the confidence which the Member States' authorities have in Europol.
Zlasti v zvezi z odnosom med Europolom in Evropskim parlamentom je treba opozoriti na naslednje vidike.
With specific reference to relations between Europol and the European Parliament, the following aspects should be highlighted.
Prvič, imenovanje in razrešitev direktorja Europola mora potekati po enakem postopku.
Firstly, one and the same system must serve for both appointing and dismissing Europol's Director.
Glede na sedanji predlog se posvetovanje s Parlamentom izvede le pri njegovi razrešitvi.
Under the current proposal, Parliament will be consulted only if the Director is to be dismissed.
Razlikovanje je treba odpraviti in Parlamentu omogočiti, da sodeluje tudi pri imenovanju direktorja.
This asymmetry should be removed by allowing Parliament to play a part in selecting the Director.
V Svetu poteka zanimiva razprava o sistemu financiranja Europola.
The system by means of which Europol is financed is the subject of intense debate within the Council.
V zvezi s tem sta dve možnosti: da se še naprej uporablja sedanji sistem medvladnega financiranja ali da se zagotovijo finančna sredstva iz proračuna Skupnosti.
There are two possibilities: either the current system of intergovernmental financing continues in operation, or Europol is financed from the Community budget.
Zaenkrat prevladuje podpora nadaljnjemu neposrednemu financiranju iz držav članic.
The current trend is to continue with direct funding from the Member Stats.
Poročevalec glede tega ni zadovoljen in opozarja, da je proračun pomembno sredstvo nadzora, ki bi ga lahko Evropski parlament izvajal nad Europolom.
The rapporteur is not happy with this and he draws attention to the importance of the budget as the main means of control which the European Parliament could exercise over Europol.
Z vključitvijo Parlamenta v pripravo proračuna Europola bi prispevali k večjemu demokratičnemu nadzoru nad uradom.
Involvement by Parliament in the drawing up of Europol's budget would help to increase the degree of democratic control over Europol.
Končno, poudariti je treba, da zgolj sprememba pravne podlage še ne pomeni večje demokratične legitimnosti, ker pri pogajanjih glede sklepa ni potrebna ratifikacija parlamentov držav članic.
Lastly, it should be pointed out that the change in legal basis does not at first sight appear to constitute an increase in democratic legitimacy, since the negotiation of a decision does not call for ratification by the Member States' parliaments.
Zato bi bilo dobro, da bi lahko Evropski parlament odobril Europolov proračun in tako imel pregled nad njegovimi dejavnostmi.
Hence it is desirable that the European Parliament should be able to approve the Europol budget in order to have an overview of its activities.
Poleg tega poročevalec predlaga, da bi se prednostne naloge Europola vsako leto predstavile v mešanem odboru, sestavljenem iz članov pristojnega odbora Evropskega parlamenta in njihovih kolegov iz parlamentov držav članic.
The rapporteur also suggests that Europol's priorities could be presented annually within a 'Joint Committee' comprising members of the European Parliament's relevant committee and their counterparts form the Member States' parliaments.
Ta predlog izhaja iz potrebe po vključitvi Evropskega parlamenta v razvoj Europola, da se zagotovi čim večja demokratična legitimnost Europola.
This suggestion springs from the need for the European Parliament to be involved in Europol's development in order to ensure that Europol enjoys maximum democratic legitimacy.
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (EUROPOL)
on the proposal for a Council decision establishing the European Police Office (EUROPOL)
V točki 47 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju z dne 17. maja 2006 je določeno, da morata obe veji proračunskega organa pravočasno doseči sporazum o financiranju vsake nove agencije.
Point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management of 17 May 2006 stipulates that the two arms of the budgetary authority have to come to a timely agreement on the financing of any new agency.
Parlament je zahteval, da se to določbo vključi v Medinstitucionalni sporazum, ker je upal, da bo s tem preprečil financiranje novih agencij iz prerazporeditve sredstev ali s črpanjem iz rezerv.
The inclusion of such a provision in the IIA was requested by Parliament, which hoped, by these means, to prevent future agencies from being financed through reprogramming or by using the margins.
Povedano drugače, agencije ne bi smele biti avtomatično financirane iz finančnega okvira, ampak bi potrebovale "svež" denar.
In other words, new agencies should not automatically be covered by the Financial Framework but might require "fresh" money.
Komisija pa namerava s svojim predlogom spremeniti Europol iz medvladnega organa, ustanovljenega v skladu z določbami iz maastrichtske pogodbe, v agencijo Evropske unije, ki bo popolnoma financirana iz proračuna Skupnosti, s čimer se bo povečala vloga Evropskega parlamenta pri nadzoru nad Europolom.
However, with its current proposal the Commission aims at converting Europol from an intergovernmental body (set up under the provisions of the Treaty of Maastricht) into a European Union agency to be fully financed from the Community budget, a step which "will enhance the role of the European Parliament in the control over Europol".
Finančni vpliv predloga bo viden šele leta 2010 po sprejetju izvedbenih ukrepov s skupnim referenčnim zneskom 334 milijonov evrov za obdobje od leta 2010 do 2013 (2010: 82 milijonov, 2011: 83 milijonov, 2012: 84 milijonov in 2013: 85 milijonov).
The financial impact of the proposal will only take effect in 2010, after the adoption of the implementing measures, with a total reference amount of EUR 334 million for the period from 2010 - 2013 (2010: 82 million, 2011: 83 million, 2012: 84 million and 2013: 85 million).
Te vsote so bile že vključene v zadnjo posodobitev finančnega načrtovanja Komisije januarja 2007.
These amounts have already been fully included in the Commission's latest update of financial programming presented in January 2007.
S tem ko Europol postane agencija Evropske unije, se s proračunskega vidika obravnava kot nova agencija, kar pomeni, da bo moral ustrezno upoštevati posebne pravice Parlamenta, kot je določeno v točki 47 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
By becoming a European Union agency, Europol is to be considered a new agency budgetwise and treated accordingly, i.e. with due regard for Parliament's prerogatives as stipulated in Point 47 of the IIA.
Splošna težava soodvisnosti med zakonodajnim postopkom in postopkom iz točke 47
General problem of interdependence between the legislative and the Point 47 procedure
Veji proračunskega organa še nista dosegli sporazuma o financiranju Europola, ki se z vidika evropskega proračuna obravnava kot nova agencija.
In the current case of Europol, the two arms of the budgetary authority have not yet agreed on the financing of this agency, which is new to the EU budget.
Vseeno pa se je v Parlamentu zakonodajni postopek že začel.
Nevertheless, the legislative procedure has already started, at least in Parliament.
Medtem ko je predlog Komisije zaradi globokih nasprotovanj glede prehoda Europola pod okrilje Skupnosti v Svetu obstal na mrtvi točki, pa želi Parlament hitro ukrepati, da izrazi svojo podporo nameri Komisije, da preoblikuje Europol v agencijo EU.
While the Commission proposal is currently blocked in Council owing to a profound controversy as to whether Europol should be communitarised at all, Parliament wants to act quickly in order to show its support for the Commission's intention to make Europol an EU agency.
Ker Svet zaradi notranjih težav, povezanih s predlogom, do zdaj še ni bil pripravljen sodelovati pri tristranskih pogovorih o financiranju Europola, sporazum v skladu s točko 47 še ni bil dosežen.
Because Council has not so far been willing, owing to its internal problems with the proposal, to discuss the financing of Europol in a trialogue, no Point 47 agreement has yet been reached.
Ali naj se zato, ker ni bil dosežen pravočasni sporazum o financiranju te agencije, zaustavi celoten zakonodajni postopek za ustanovitev nove agencije?
Should this lack of a timely agreement on the financing of a new agency now bring the whole legislative procedure aimed at creating this agency to a standstill?
V teh okoliščinah se je pripravljavka mnenja odločila za pragmatični pristop: sprejme se sklep o ustanovitvi z "izjavo o omejitvi odgovornosti", ki navaja, da sporazum o financiranju še ni bil dosežen, in da je to vprašanje še odprto (predlogi sprememb 1, 2, 3, 4 in 10).
In these circumstances, your draftswoman has opted for a pragmatic approach, viz.: adoption of the founding decision with "disclaimers", indicating that no agreement on the financing has yet been reached and that this problem is therefore still open for negotiation (Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10).
Posebne težave Europola kot agencije EU
Particular problems of Europol as an EU agency
Pripravljavka mnenja je dopolnila/ponovno vključila te elemente – tj. v zvezi s splošnimi prerogativami Parlamenta (predlogi sprememb 5, 8, 12, 13 in 16), pravicami in dolžnostmi organov Europola (predlogi sprememb 6, 7, 9 in 11), finančnimi pravili agencije (predloga sprememb 14 in 19), njenim nadzornim sistemom (predlog spremembe 15) ter izbiro osebja in pogoji njihovega zaposlovanja (predloga sprememb 17 in 18).
Your draftswoman has strengthened / reintroduced these elements, i.e. with regard to the general prerogatives of Parliament (Amendments 5, 8, 12, 13 and 16), the rights and duties of the bodies of Europol (Amendments 6, 7, 9 and 11), the agency's financial rules (Amendments 14 and 19), its monitoring system (Amendment 15) and the selection of its staff and their conditions of employment (Amendments 17 and 18).
Predllog sklepa
Proposal for a decision
UL C ..., str..
OJ C , , p..
Navedbi sklicevanj 1 a in 1 b (novo)
Citations 1 a and 1 b (new)
Ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES,Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti 1 (finančna uredba), in zlasti člena 185 te uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities 1 (Financial Regulation), and in particular Article 185 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju 2 , zlasti točke 47,
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management 2 , and in particular Point 47 thereof,
(5) Ustanovitev Europola kot agencije Evropske unije, ki se financira iz splošnega proračuna Evropskih skupnosti, bo okrepila vlogo Evropskega parlamenta pri nadzoru nad Europolom na podlagi vključenosti Evropskega parlamenta pri sprejetju proračuna.
(5) Establishing Europol as an agency of the European Union, funded from the general budget of the European Communities will enhance the role of the European Parliament in the control over Europol, through the involvement of the European Parliament in the adoption of the budget.
(5) Ustanovitev Europola kot agencije Evropske unije, ki se financira iz splošnega proračuna Evropskih skupnosti, bo okrepila vlogo Evropskega parlamenta pri nadzoru nad Europolom na podlagi vključenosti Evropskega parlamenta pri sprejetju proračuna , kadrovskem načrtovanju in postopku razrešnice .
(5) Establishing Europol as an agency of the European Union, funded from the general budget of the European Communities, will enhance the role of the European Parliament in the control over Europol, through the involvement of the European Parliament in the adoption of the budget, including the establishment plan, and in the discharge procedure.
Ta organ se ustanovi v skladu s členom 185 finančne uredbe in točko 47 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju z dne 17. maja 2006.
It is a body set up in accordance with Article 185 of the Financial Regulation and Point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management of 17 May 2006.
(c) sprejme izvedbena pravila, ki se uporabljajo za osebje Europola, na predlog direktorja in po soglasju Komisije;
(c) adopt the implementing rules applicable to Europol staff, on a proposal from the Director and after seeking agreement from the Commission;
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
(c) adopt the implementing rules applicable to Europol staff, on a proposal from the Director and after agreement from the Commission;
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
The implementing rules applicable to Europol staff have to be agreed by the Commission.
Upravni odbor , potem ko to potrdi Svet, vsako leto sprejme:
The Management Board shall adopt each year , after endorsement by the Council :
(a) oceno predloga proračuna (črtano) , ki jo je treba predložiti Komisiji, vključno z osnutkom kadrovskega načrta , (črtano) ;
(a) the draft budget estimate to be submitted to the Commission, including the draft establishment plan;
(aa) proračun agencije in kadrovski načrt po odobritvi proračunskega organa;
(aa) the agency's budget, including the establishment plan, after authorisation by the budgetary authority;