natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če predlog ne bo sprejet pred začetkom veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe, bo moral Parlament postopek za preoblikovanje Europola v resnični organ Skupnosti začeti znova.
If not adopted before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, Parliament should re-open the procedure in order to transform Europol into a genuine Community body.
Kadar bodo države članice uporabile postopek začasne prekinitve, ki ga pri kazenskih zadevah predvideva Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije (člena 82(3) in 83(3)), bo predsednik Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poslal pisno sporočilo Evropskemu svetu, v katerem bo predstavil stališče, ki se je izoblikovalo v razpravah odbora.
Where Member States make use of the emergency blocking procedure provided for in the TFEU in relation to criminal matters (Articles 82(3) and 83(3)), the Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs will write to the European Council expressing the current position reached in its debates.
Zdi se, da bodo po 1. januarju 2009 najnujnejše pobude, ki jih bo morala sprejeti Komisija, povezane z
It would appear that after 1 January 2009, the most urgent initiatives that the Commission should take then now on will be linked with:
a) obveznostjo EU, da ratificira konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
a) the EU obligation to ratify the ECHR;
b) obveznostjo EU, da ratificira mednarodne sporazume, o katerih so se pogajanja že zaključila, a še niso bili sklenjeni v skladu s členom 24 veljavne pogodbe o EU,
b) the EU obligation to ratify international agreements negotiated but not yet concluded under Article 24 of the current EU Treaty;
c) zahtevami Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti (glej: zadeva o uredbi o črnih seznamih),
c) the Court of Justice requirements (see the case of the Black Lists regulation);
d) ustanovitvijo evropskega javnega tožilstva , da se izboljša Eurojust.
d) the setting up of a European Public Prosecutor's Office to improve Eurojust.
S spremembo pravne podlage za sedanje instrumente iz tretjega stebra bi se zagotovila tudi pristojnost Sodišča pred rokom 5 let (glej člen 10 protokola o prehodnih določbah).
A change of legal basis for current third pillar instruments would also ensure the competence of the Court of Justice before the 5 year deadline (see Article 10 of the Protocol on transitional provisions).
Evropski parlament pozdravlja oceno treh predsedstev, po kateri bi bilo treba „prisilnim ukrepom dodati ustrezna pravila, da bi okrepili pravice posameznika, najsi bo osumljenca, žrtve ali priče.
Parliament welcomes the Trio Presidency assessment that 'Coercive measures should be accompanied by corresponding rules to strengthen the rights of the individual, whether a suspect, victim or witness.
Možnosti razširitve pravic žrtev bodo preučene na podlagi ocene, ki jo pripravlja Komisija glede izvajanja okvirnega sklepa o položaju žrtev v kazenskem postopku.
The possible development of the rights of victims will be examined on the basis of the Commission's assessment of the implementation of the Framework Decision on the Standing of Victims in Criminal Proceedings.
Po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe naj bi Komisija ali države članice dale predlog za pravni instrument o procesnih pravicah v kazenskih postopkih.“
After the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, a proposal for a legal instrument on procedural rights in criminal proceedings will be expected from the Commission or from Member States.'
1. izraža veliko zadovoljstvo nad tem, da je enakost žensk in moških v Pogodbi zapisana kot ena izmed vrednot Unije (člen 2 PEU) in njenih ciljev (člen 3( 3), drugi odstavek PEU);
Notes with satisfaction that equality between women and men has been included among the Union’s values (Article 2 of the TEU) and aims (Article 3(3), second subparagraph, of the TEU);
9. poziva Komisijo, naj mu v treh letih po začetku veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe predloži prvo oceno učinka pogodbe v državah članice glede boja proti trgovini z ljudmi, zlasti ženskami in otroki, za namene spolne zlorabe;
Calls on the Commission to provide it, within three years following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, with an initial assessment of the impact of that Treaty in the Member States on the fight against the trafficking of human beings, in particular women and children, for the purposes of sexual exploitation;
MNENJE Odbora za peticije
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions (*)
3. poudarja, da ima Odbor za peticije pri tem pomembno vlogo in odgovornost, ter da je treba pridobiti polno in učinkovito sodelovanje vseh institucij in organov EU, vseh držav članic in regionalnih ter lokalnih oblasti, da bodo v duhu lizbonske pogodbe odgovarjali in obravnavali pomisleke državljanov EU;
Underlines the role and responsibilities of the Petitions Committee in this respect and the importance of obtaining the full and effective cooperation of all EU institutions and bodies, and of all Member States and regional and local authorities, in providing a response and a solution to the concerns of EU citizens, in the spirit of the Lisbon Treaty;
7. meni, da mora Parlament pregledati, kako lahko pripravi ustrezne postopke za spremljanje in podpiranje pobud državljanov, ter je prepričan, da bi moral imeti Odbor za peticije ključno vlogo pri teh postopkih, saj ima že veliko izkušenj z obravnavo vprašanj, ki so za državljane pomembna;
Considers that Parliament needs to examine how it could devise appropriate procedures for following and supporting citizens' initiatives, and believes that the Committee on Petitions, which already has broad experience of working with citizens on issues of concern to them, should play a key role in such procedures;
9. ugotavlja, da bosta okrepljeni status Listine o temeljnih pravicah ter vse širši obseg dejavnosti, ki so lahko predmet postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, zlasti na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev, neposredno vplivala na delo Odbora za peticije, kadar bo ta izvajal parlamentarni nadzor v imenu državljanov;
Notes that the reinforced status of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as the broadening of the scope of the activities which may be the subject of infringement proceedings, notably in the field of justice and home affairs, will have a direct effect on the work of the Committee on Petitions when that Committee is exercising parliamentary control on behalf of citizens;
Jo Leinen, poslanec Evropskega parlamenta
Mr Jo Leinen, MEP
V vašem delovnem dokumentu z dne 3. aprila 2008 ste povabili odbore, naj podajo svoja mnenja na podlagi dveh glavnih vprašanj:
In your working document of 3 April 2008 you invite the committees to deliver their opinions on the basis of 2 main questions:
1) Katere so politične prednostne naloge odbora glede na uporabo novih pristojnosti Parlamenta, določenih v lizbonski pogodbi?
1) Which are the committee's political priorities with regard to the use of Parliament's new powers provided for in the Lisbon Treaty?
2) Kako se namerava odbor soočiti s prehodom od posvetovanja na soodločanje v zakonodajnih postopkih in z ostalimi spremembami postopkov?
2) How does the committee envisage to cope with the transition from consultation to co-decision in legislative procedures and with other procedural changes?
Med spremembami na področju pristojnosti mojega odbora so tudi:
Changes in the area of competences of my committee include the following:
· Poudarek je na odgovornosti držav članic za izvrševanje proračuna (člen 317 PDEU)
· Member States' responsibility for the implementation of the budget is emphasized (Article 317 TFEU)
Številčenje se nanaša na prečiščeno različico lizbonske pogodbe, kot je bila objavljena v UL C 115, 9.5.2008, str.
The numbering corresponds to the consolidated version of the Treaty of Lisbon as published in OJ C 115, 9.5.2008, p.1. .
1. , praktične posledice teh določb pa so za zdaj neznane.
Practical consequences of these provisions are unknown at this stage.
· Komisija pripravi poročilo o oceni financ Unije , ki ga Parlament obravnava v postopku podelitve razrešnice (člena 318 in 319 PDEU).
· The Commission shall submit an evaluation report on the Union 's finances, which Parliament shall examine in the discharge procedure (Articles 318 and 319 TFEU).
· Finančna uredba se bo sprejemala z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom, t.j. soodločanjem (člen 322 PDEU) in ne več s postopkom posvetovanja.
· The adoption of the financial regulation , will no longer be subject to the consultation procedure, but to the ordinary legislative procedure, i.e. co-decision (Article 322 TFEU).
Potrebna je revizija medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju zaradi novih predpisov o večletnem finančnem okviru (člen 312 PDEU) in finančni uredbi (člen 322 PDEU).
As a consequence of the new provisions on the multi-annual financial framework (Art. 312 TFEU) and on the financial regulation (Art. 322 TFEU) the inter-institutional agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management will have to be reviewed.
· Pravna podlaga za sprejetje ukrepov na področju preprečevanja goljufij, ki škodujejo finančnim interesom Unije (člen 325 PDEU), je okrepljena.
· The legal basis for the adoption of measures in the fields of the prevention of and the fight against fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union is strengthened (Art. 325 TFEU).
· Lizbonska pogodba določa tudi možnost ustanovitve evropskega javnega tožilstva za boj proti kaznivim dejanjem, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Unije (člen 86 PDEU).
· The Treaty of Lisbon also provides for the possibility to establish a European Public Prosecutor's Office in order to combat crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union (Art. 86 TFEU).
Predsednik Odbora za proračunski nadzor
Chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control
PRILOGA: PISMO ODBORA ZA INDUSTRIJO, RAZISKAVE IN ENERGETIKO
ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY
Zadeva: samoiniciativno poročilo Odbora za ustavne zadeve o novi vlogi in pristojnostih Parlamenta pri izvajanju lizbonske pogodbe
Subject: INI report by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on 'Parliament's new role and responsibilities in implementing the Treaty of Lisbon'
Mnenje odbora ITRE v obliki pisma
ITRE opinion in form of a Letter
Glede vašega pisma z dne 13. marca 2008 bi vas rada obvestila, da je Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energijo sklenil, da ne bo imenoval uradnega poročevalca, pač pa me je kot predsednico pooblastil, da sporočim mnenje odbora ITRE v obliki pisma.
Referring to your letter dated 13 March 2008, I would like to inform you that the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy decided not to designate a formal Rapporteur but has given me a mandate, as Chairwoman, to communicate ITRE's opinion by way of a letter.
To pismo je nastalo v dogovoru s koordinatorji ITRE.
This letter has been agreed with ITRE coordinators.
To je za moj odbor prednostna politika, saj bo energija v Pogodbi imela ločen naslov XX, s tem pa pravno podlago (člen 176A).
It is a priority policy for my committee because energy will now have a separate Title XX in the Treaty and thus a legal basis (Art. 176A).
Vseeno je treba opozoriti, da bo „redni zakonodajni postopek“ sicer splošno pravilo, vendar bodo odločitve o uporabi različnih virov energije še naprej v pristojnosti držav članic.
It should be noted, though, that while the ' ordinary legislative procedure' will be followed as a rule, decisions on the energy mix will still remain within the competence of the Member States.
Nadalje se bodo davčni ukrepi na tem področju še naprej sprejemali po posvetovanju s Parlamentom in s soglasjem v Svetu.
Furthermore, fiscal measures in this field will still require the consultation of Parliament and unanimity in Council.
To je pomembno za naše zakonodajalno delo, zlasti zaradi izvajanja protokola o subsidiarnosti, po katerem se je treba z nacionalnimi parlamenti posvetovati o vseh zakonodajnih predlogih, ki so v postopku sprejemanja na dan 31. decembra 2008.
This is of importance to our legislative work, particularly in view of the application of the Protocol on Subsidiarity and thus the national Parliaments should be consulted on all legislative proposals pending as at 31 December 2008.
Pogodba o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo
European Atomic Energy Community Treaty
Prepričana sem, da pogodba Euratom ostaja nepogrešljiv pravni okvir, in ugotavljam, da je lizbonska pogodba ni bistveno spremenila.
I am led to believe that the Euratom Treaty remains for the time being an indispensable legal framework and notes that no significant changes have been made to it by the ToL.
Lizbonski pogodbi je dodan protokol št. 12, ki spreminja pogodbo Euratom, da bi upoštevala skupnih določb iz drugih pogodb, kot so institucionalne in finančne določbe.
In fact, Protocol No 12 is added to ToL, seeking to adapt the Euratom Treaty in order to take account of common provisions laid down in the other Treaties, such as institutional and financial provisions.
Elektronske komunikacije in informacijska družba
Electronic Communications and Information Society
Če ne upoštevamo izvajanja protokola o subsidiarnosti tudi na tem področju, začetek veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe ne bi prinesel velikih sprememb za to področje.
Apart from the application of the Protocol on Subsidiarity to this sector as well, the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty would not bring much change in this field.
Tako bo člen 95 sedanje pogodbe ostal pravna podlaga za sprejemanje zakonodajnih aktov ob uporabi rednega zakonodajnega postopka.
Hence, Article 95 of the current Treaty will remain the legal base for the adoption of legal acts, while applying the ordinary legislative procedure.
Pri primernosti zakonodaje na tem področju tudi v prihodnosti in njenemu prilagajanju hitrim spremembam v tehnologiji bodo delegirani in izvedbeni akti (člena 249B in 249C lizbonske pogodbe) odigrali pomembno vlogo.
However, in order to make legislation in this field 'future-proof' and adjustable to rapid technological changes, delegated and implementing acts (ToL Articles 249B and 249C) will have an important role to play.
Zaradi tega je nekaj nejasnosti glede učinka nove ureditve in glede potrebnih prilagoditev zakonodajnih postopkov, ki še potekajo.
Consequently there is some uncertainty around the impact of the new regime and the necessary adjustments to the ongoing legislative procedures.
Raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in vesolje
Research and Technological Development and Space
Rada bi vas opozorila na naslednje določbe lizbonske pogodbe.
I would like to draw your attention to the following provisions of the ToL.
Spremenjene člene163, 165 in 166 Pogodbe ES je treba šteti med izboljšave, saj krepijo znanstvene in tehnološke temelje z vzpostavitvijo evropskega raziskovalnega območja.
The amended Articles 163, 165 and 166 of the EC Treaty should be considered as improvements because they strengthen scientific and technological bases via the establishment of a European Research Area .
Dejansko bodo ukrepi, potrebni za vzpostavitev evropskega raziskovalnega območja, sprejeti po rednem zakonodajnem postopku (člen 166(5)).
In fact ' the measures necessary for the implementation of the European Research Area will be adopted by the ordinary legislative procedure' (Art. 166 (5)).
Treba pa je opozoriti na tri potencialno sporne zadeve med Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom:
However, three potentially contentious issues between the European Parliament and the Council should be noted:
a) za sporazume med EU in tretjimi državami ali mednarodnimi organizacijami (člen 170) ne bo več veljal člen 300, saj postopek sprejemanja odločitev ni izrecno omenjen;
a) Agreements between the EU and third countries or international organisations (Art. 170) will no longer fall under the Article 300 because the decision making procedure is not explicitly stated;
b) ohranitev členov 171 in 172 o ustanavljanju skupnih podjetij bi pomenila, da se za ustanavljanje agencij še naprej uporablja postopek posvetovanja, ta ohranitev pa morda ni v skladu z duhom pravnih aktov Unije,
b) The retention of Articles 171 and 172 on setting up of joint undertakings, would mean the continuance of the consultation procedure to establish agencies, and possibly such a retention may not conform to the spirit of the legal acts of the Union;
c) večletni okvirni program bo sprejet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku (člen 166(5)), posebni programi pa bodo sprejeti po posebnem zakonodajnem postopku, kar pomeni zgolj posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom (člen 166(4)).
c) Whereas the ' multiannual framework programme’ will be adopted by the ordinary legislative procedure ' (Art. 166 (5)), the ' specific programmes ' will be adopted by the 'special legislative procedure ', implying simple consultation for the European Parliament (Art. 166 (4)).
Ne glede na to moj odbor izraža zadovoljstvo nad določbo o evropski vesoljski politiki (člen 172a), ki je bila vstavljena v del o raziskavah in tehnološkem razvoju, in pozdravlja priložnost, ki je dana Parlamentu in Svetu, da po rednem zakonodajnem postopku sprejmeta potrebne ukrepe za evropski program o vesolju.
Notwithstanding these concerns, my Committee has expressed its satisfaction at the insertion of a provision on a European Space Policy (Art. 172a) into the section on Research and Technological Development, and has welcomed the opportunity given to Parliament and to the Council to adopt, under the ordinary legislative procedure, the necessary measures establishing a European Space Programme.
Moj odbor tudi meni, da lahko določilo, da je „izključeno kakršno koli usklajevanje zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic na tem področju“ (člen 172a (2)), pomeni ovire za izvajanje skupne evropske vesoljske politike.
My Committee also considers that 'excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States in this field' (Art. 172a (2)) may imply some obstacles to the implementation of a common European Space Policy.
Vaš odbor bi rada opozorila na protokol št. 11 o raziskovalnem skladu za premog in jeklo, ki uvaja postopkovne določbe, ki ne bodo izboljšale sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta v postopku sprejemanja odločitev (ohranjen je postopek posvetovanja.)
I would like to draw your committee's attention to Protocol No 11 on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, which introduces procedural provisions that will not enhance the participation of the European Parliament in the decision-making process (the consultation procedure is retained).
Dejansko bo redni zakonodajni postopek veljal za posebne ukrepe v podporo ukrepanju držav članic (člen 157(3)), ko pa bo potrebno usklajeno ukrepanje, Evropski parlament ne bo sodeloval pri sprejemanju odločitev.
In fact the ordinary legislative procedure will apply to ' specific measures in support of action taken in the Member State ' (Art. 157 (3)).
Bo le obveščen (člen 157(2)).
However, the European Parliament will not participate in decision-making when coordinated action is deemed necessary; it will be kept informed ( Art. 157 (2)).
Horizontalna vprašanja
Horizontal Issues
V zvezi s zakonskimi predlogi, ki so v postopku sprejemanja ali za katere je verjetno, da bodo vloženi pred začetkom veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe, je treba omeniti dve točki:
Two points should be mentioned in the context of legal proposals, currently pending or likely to be submitted until the entry into force of the ToL:
b) Tudi nacionalni parlamenti prejemajo zakonodajne predloge v postopku soodločanja, saj jim jih je Komisija na neformalni osnovi pošiljala od leta 2006.
b) National Parliaments have been recipients of legislative proposals under co-decision from the Commission because the latter has, on an informal basis, sent its proposals to them since 2006.
S tem v zvezi bi bilo treba – ob upoštevanju protokola št. 1 o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov in protokola št. 2 o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ter ad hoc prakse iz zgornjega odstavka in ne glede na pravno razlago in praktično ureditev postopkov soodločanja, ki ob začetku veljavnosti nove pogodbe še ne bodo končani – glede novih postopkovnih elementov posvetovanja z nacionalnimi parlamenti najti pravično politično rešitev, ki bi spoštovala duha lizbonske pogodbe.
In this context, given Protocol No 1 on the role of National Parliaments and Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the ad-hoc practice mentioned in the previous paragraph, whichever the legal interpretation and practical arrangements for ongoing co-decision procedures at the entry in force of the new Treaty, concerning the new procedural element of consultation of National Parliaments, a fair political solution should be found in order to respect the spirit of the ToL.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o navajanju porabe energije in drugih virov izdelkov, ki vplivajo na rabo energije, s pomočjo nalepk in standardiziranih podatkov o izdelku (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products (recast)
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA......................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION......................................5
PRILOGA: PISMO ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE...........................................................37
ANNEX : LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS..................................38
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE DELOVNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA, SVETA IN KOMISIJE 39
ANNEX : OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION 40
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0778 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0778 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0412/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0412/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za pravne zadeve Odboru za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko z dne 11. marca 2009 v skladu s členom 80a(3) Poslovnika,
– having regard to the letter of 11 March 2009 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy in accordance with Rule 80a(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju členov 80a in 51 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 80 a and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0146/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0146/2009 ),