natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti na ustrezno sodno prakso glede načela lojalnega sodelovanja (člen 4(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji), v skladu s katerim se morajo institucije Unije medsebojno spoštovati in si pomagati pri izpolnjevanju nalog.
In this connection it must be recalled that the relevant case-law concerning the principle of sincere cooperation (Article 4, paragraph 3, Treaty on European Union), according to which the Union institutions are subject to the duty to cooperate in good faith in their relations with each other.
Ta obveznost je jasno določena v novem členu 13(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
This obligation is clearly stipulated by the new Article 13, paragraph 2 of the Treaty on European Union.
Dodatne informacije
Further Information
V skladu s členom 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah ima „vsakdo ... pravico, da institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku“.
According to Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, ‘ Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union ’ .
Žal je izkušnja varuha človekovih pravic, da Komisija pogosto ne spoštuje rokov iz Uredbe 1049/2001 o obravnavi prošenj za dostop javnosti do dokumentov.
Unfortunately, it is the experience of the Ombudsman that the Commission too often fails to respect the deadlines established by Regulation 1049/2001 for dealing with public access requests.
Odziv Komisije je še slabši v primeru pritožb državljanov varuhu človekovih pravic o dostopu do dokumentov.
Even worse is the Commission’s performance when citizens complain to the Ombudsman in access to documents cases.
V 22 primerih, ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic obravnaval leta 2009, je Komisija spoštovala prvotni rok za odgovor na pritožbo zgolj v štirih primerih, kar je manj kot ena petina primerov.
Out of 22 such cases dealt with by the Ombudsman in 2009, the Commission respected the original deadline for reply to the complaint in only 4, i.e. less than one fifth.
V večini primerov (14 od 22) je bila zamuda daljša od 30 dni.
In the majority of cases (14 out of 22) there was a delay of more than 30 days.
V več kot četrtini vseh primerov (6 od 22) je bila zamuda 80 dni in več.
In more than a quarter of the total cases (6 out of 22), the delay was of 80 days or more.
4. maja 2010 se je varuh udeležil sestanka Odbora za peticije in pojasnil posebno poročilo.
On 4 May 2010, the Ombudsman attended a meeting of the Committee on Petitions and explained the special report.
V svojem govoru je omenil drug primer dostopa do dokumentov (355/2007(TN)FOR), kjer je Komisija trikrat prestavila rok za svoje podrobno mnenje o osnutku priporočila.
During his speech, he mentioned that there was another access to documents case (355/2007(TN)FOR) in which the Commission had delayed its detailed opinion on a draft recommendation three times.
Pritožbo je vložila nevladna organizacija Evropski urad za okolje.
This is a complaint submitted by an NGO - the European Environmental Bureau.
Varuh človekovih pravic je 29. junija 2009 pripravil osnutek priporočila o tej zadevi.
The Ombudsman made a draft recommendation in this case on 29 June 2009.
Komisija bi morala predložiti svoje mnenje 31. oktobra 2009.
The Commission should have sent its opinion on 31 October 2009.
27. maja 2010 je Komisija sporočila, da za potrobno mnenje potrebuje čas še do 31. julija 2010, saj „nejasno pravno stanje še vedno prevladuje“.
On 27 May 2010, the Commission announced that it needed until 31 July 2010 to send its detailed opinion because ‘an unclear legal situation still prevails’.
Dejstvo, da je Komisija omogočila dostop do pisem v zadevi 676/2008/RT potem, ko je varuh človekovih pravic podal svoje posebno poročilo, bi morali videti kot uspeh za parlamentarni postopek nadzora dela Komisije s pomočjo preiskav, ki jih opravi varuh človekovih pravic.
The fact that the Commission did indeed grant access to the letters in case 676/2008/RT after the Ombudsman submitted his special report should be considered a success for the Parliamentary process of supervising the work of the Commission through the operation of the Ombudsman’s inquiries.
Vseeno lahko Evropski parlament samo ugotovi, da je Evropska komisija z odlaganjem odgovora na osnutek priporočila za 15 mesecev in s tem, ko ni izvršila svoje zaveze, da Porsche obvesti o nameri razkritja dokumenta, kršila dolžnost lojalnega sodelovanja z Evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic ter da takšen odnos Komisije ne škodi le medinstitucionalnemu dialogu, temveč tudi javni podobi EU.
Nevertheless the European Parliament can only conclude that, by delaying its reply to the draft recommendation for 15 months and by failing to implement its undertaking to notify Porsche of its intention to disclose, the European Commission infringed its obligation to cooperate with the European Ombudsman sincerely and in good faith, and that this attitude on the part of the Commission is detrimental not only to inter-institutional dialogue, but also to the public image of the EU.
Med svojo preiskavo je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic ugotovil, da je prišlo do upravnih nepravilnosti, in Evropski komisiji dal vse možnosti, da te odpravi.
In the course of his inquiry, the European Ombudsman established an instance of maladministration and gave the European Commission every possibility to remedy it.
Nekooperativni odnos Komisije v tem pogledu grozi, da bo izničil zaupanje državljanov vanjo in spodkopal sposobnost Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in Evropskega parlamenta, da jo ustrezno in uspešno nadzirata.
The Commission’s uncooperative attitude in this regard risks eroding citizens’ trust in the Commission and undermining the capacity of the European Ombudsman and the European Parliament to supervise the Commission in an adequate and effective way.
Tudi sicer je takšen odnos sam po sebi v nasprotju z načelom vladavine prava, na katerem je utemeljena EU.
As such, it runs counter to the very principle of the rule of law upon which the European Union is founded.
Prav tako je jasno, da si Komisija prepogosto privošči zamude pri odgovarjanju na prošnje za dostop.
Furthermore, it is clear that the Commission too often incurs delays in responding to requests for access.
V večini primerov, ki zadevajo dostop do dokumentov, znatno zamuja pri odgovoru varuhu in v nekaterih primerih so te zamude zelo dolge.
It is substantially late in replying to the Ombudsman in the majority of access to documents cases and, in some cases, the delays are very lengthy.
S tem se ustvarja sistemska težava.
This situation creates a systemic problem.
Državljanom odreka eno od glavnih koristi, ki jih lahko pričakujejo od svoje temeljne pravice, da se pritožijo varuhu človekovih pravic, kar je, hitrejši rezultat kot bi ga dobili, če bi se obrnili na Sodišče.
It deprives citizens of one of the key benefits that can expect from using their fundamental right to complain to the Ombudsman; that is to say, a quicker outcome than is available by going to Court.
Evropski parlament zato zahteva, da Evropska komisija prizna, da je šlo pri pretiranem odlaganju odgovora Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic v tej zadevi za kršitev njene dolžnosti lojalnega sodelovanja, kot je določeno v PEU, ter da sprejme zavezo, da bo v prihodnosti spoštovala dolžnost lojalnega sodelovanja z Evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic.
The European Parliament therefore requires that the European Commission acknowledge that the excessive delays in responding to the European Ombudsman in this case constitute a breach of its duty of sincere cooperation as envisaged by the TEU and that it gives an undertaking that it will respect the duty of sincere cooperation with the European Ombudsman in the future.
Če Komisija ne bo podala takšne zaveze in/ali bo vztrajala pri svoji nekooperativni praksi v odnosu do varuha človekovih pravic, potem jo lahko Parlament sankcionira.
Should the Commission fail to give such an undertaking and/or persist in its uncooperative practices towards Ombudsman, Parliament may sanction the Commission.
Sankcije lahko vključujejo tudi prerazporeditev dela proračuna Komisije za upravne odhodke v rezervo.
Such sanctions may include , inter alia , the placing of a portion of the Commission’s budget for administrative expenditure into reserve.
Margrete Auken, Victor Boştinaru, Pascale Gruny, Peter Jahr, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli), Nikolaos Salavrakos, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa, Angelika Werthmann
Margrete Auken, Victor Boştinaru, Pascale Gruny, Peter Jahr, Mariya Nedelcheva, Chrysoula Paliadeli, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa, Angelika Werthmann
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................11
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0358 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0358 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 77(2)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0162/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 77(2)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0162/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0294/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7‑0294/2010 ),
Priloga II – del 4 (novo)
Annex II – part 4 (new)
(*) Izvzetje iz vizumske obveznosti ne velja za imetnike potnih listov, izdanih v Tajvanu, ki ne vsebujejo številke osebne izkaznice.
(*) The exemption from the visa requirement does not apply to holders of passports issued by Taiwan which do not include an identity card number.
I – SPLOŠNA VPRAŠANJA
I – GENERAL ISSUES
Uredba (ES) št. 539/2001 vsebuje seznam tretjih držav, katerih državljani morajo pri prehodu zunanjih meja Unije imeti vizum, in držav, katerih državljani so oproščeni te zahteve.
Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 lists the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the Union’s external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement.
Odločitev o tem, katere so tretje države, katerih državljani potrebujejo vizum, se sprejme na podlagi s konkretnimi primeri utemeljene presoje razmer v tej državi, pri čemer se upoštevajo nezakonito priseljevanje, vprašanja v zvezi z javnim redom in varnostjo, zunanji odnosi Unije, teritorialna celovitost in načelo vzajemnosti.
The decision on which third countries to whose nationals this visa requirement applies is taken on the basis of a case-by-case assessment of the situation in the country concerned, taking into account illegal immigration, public order and security issues, the EU’s external relations, territorial coherence and the principle of reciprocity.
Ker se ta merila sčasoma lahko spremenijo, zakonodaja Skupnosti določa revizijski postopek, po katerem se vizumska obveznost lahko odpravi v tistih državah, kjer so bili glede teh vprašanj zabeleženi pozitivni premiki.
Given that these criteria are likely to change over time, Community legislation provides for a review procedure so that the visa requirement can be lifted in countries in which there have been positive developments in relation to the issues mentioned above.
Postopek presoje pa lahko poteka tudi v obratni smeri in se vizumska obveznost ponovno vzpostavi za države, v katerih se beležijo negativni premiki glede omenjenih vidikov, ali za države, ki uvedejo vizumsko obveznost za državljane ene ali več držav članic.
The assessment procedure can also work the other way around, reinstating the visa requirement for countries in which there are negative developments in relation to the aspects mentioned above, or for countries that introduce visa requirements for nationals of one or more Member States.
Ugotovitve Komisija temeljijo na informacijah, ki jih predložijo države članice, ter uporabnih podatkih, ki jih posreduje Center za obveščanje, študij in izmenjavo podatkov o prečkanju meja in priseljevanju (CIREFI).
The Commission issues its findings on the basis of information submitted by the Member States and useful data supplied by the Centre for Information, Discussion and Exchange on the Crossing of Frontiers and Immigration (CIREFI).
II – PRENOS TAJVANA NA POZITIVNI SEZNAM (ODPRAVA VIZUMSKE OBVEZNOSTI)
II – TRANSFERRING TAIWAN TO THE POSITIVE LIST (VISA WAIVER)
Predlog uredbe o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001 ne pomeni precedensa in ne posega v druge okoliščine na evropski celini.
The proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 does not constitute a precedent and is without prejudice to other situations within Europe as a continent.
Namen predloga je oblikovati skupno politiko priseljevanja, obenem pa prispevati k okrepitvi trgovinskih odnosov med Evropsko unijo in Tajvanom.
The aim of the proposal is to develop a common immigration policy, at the same time helping to enhance trade relations between the European Union and Taiwan.
Politično in gospodarsko ozadje
Political and economic context
V zadnjih desetletjih na Tajvanu poteka pomemben proces demokratizacije.
Over the last few decades, Taiwan has been going through a major process of democratisation.
Politične spremembe, ki so nastopile v osemdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja, so leta 1996 privedle do prvih neposrednih predsedniških volitev.
The political changes introduced during the 1980s culminated in the first direct presidential elections being held in 1996.
Od tedaj politično stabilnost na Tajvanu zagotavlja kombinacija institucionalnih reform, dinamične civilne družbe in spoštovanja državljanskih svoboščin in pravic.
Ever since, institutional reform, a dynamic civil society and respect for civil liberties and citizens’ rights have combined to help shore up political stability in Taiwan.
Najvišji predstavnik Tajvana je predsednik, ki je – kot smo že omenili – izvoljen na splošnih volitvah za štiri leta.
The most senior office in Taiwan is that of its President, who is elected by the people of Taiwan via universal suffrage.
Predsednik imenuje predsednika vlade z nalogo, da pripravi tajvansko vlado in imenuje ministre, kateri sestavljajo izvršno predsedstvo.
The President appoints the Premier, who then puts together Taiwan’s government and appoints the ministers who will make up the Executive Yuan Council, or Cabinet.
Zakonodajno oblast na otoku aktualno vrši zakonodajni Yuan, ki šteje 113 sedežev.
Legislative power in Taiwan currently lies with the Legislative Yuan, which has 113 members.
Njegovi člani so imenovani po dvojnem sistemu poimenskega glasovanja z izvolitvijo kandidata za vsako volilno enoto na eni strani in na drugi z njegovo izvolitvijo v politični stranki.
The members of the Legislative Yuan are elected via a single-member constituency electoral system with two votes, one for the candidate and one for the political party.
Člani Yuana so izvoljeni za štiriletni mandat.
Members serve four-year terms.
Dohodek na prebivalca je eden od najvišjih na svetu (30.100 ameriških dolarjev).
Its income per head of population is one of the highest in the world (USD 30 100).
Julija 2010 je bila brezposelnost 5,2-odstotna, kar je precej pod evropskim povprečjem, ki je bilo v istem mesecu 10,1-odstotno.
In July 2010, unemployment stood at 5.2%, way below the European average, which was 10.1% in the same month.
Leta 1950 je bil Tajvan revnejši od Gane, Ugande in Demokratične republike Kongo.
In 1950, Taiwan was poorer than Ghana, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Do leta 1960 je bil od izvoza blaga bolj odvisen kot na primer Kenija, Južna Afrika in Libanon.
Until 1960, it was more reliant on commodities exports than countries like Kenya, South Africa and Lebanon.
Danes pa predstavlja blago, proizvedeno na Tajvanu, več kot 97 % izvoza te države.
Today, products manufactured in Taiwan account for more than 97% of the country’s exports.
Številke, ki jih je MDS objavil leta 2009, uvrščajo tajvansko gospodarsko z BNP 379 milijard USD na 25. mesto v svetu.
Figures published by the IMF in 2009 placed Taiwan’s economy 25th in the world, with a GNP of USD 379 billion.
V prvem trimesečju leta 2010 je gospodarska rast v državi dosegla 13,27 %, medtem ko je v prvem polletju tega leta presežek trgovinske bilance znašal 12,1 milijarde ameriških dolarjev.
During the first quarter of 2010, economic growth hit 13.27%, whilst during the first half of 2010, the balance of trade surplus stood at USD 12.1 billion.
Evropska unija in Tajvan imata pomembne skupne gospodarske in trgovinske odnose, sodelujeta pa tudi na področju raziskav, znanosti, tehnologije, izobraževanja, kulture in okolja.
The European Union and Taiwan share an important economic and trade relationship, as well as cooperating in the fields of research, science, technology, education, culture and the environment.
Tajvan je četrta največja trgovinska partnerica Unije v Aziji, Unija pa je največja tuja vlagateljica na otoku.
Taiwan is the EU’s fourth largest trading partner in Asia, and the EU is the leading foreign investor in Taiwan.
Obseg trgovinske menjave med državami članicami in Tajvanom je leta 2008 znašal 47 milijard ameriških dolarjev.
The volume of trade between the Member States and Taiwan stood at USD 47 billion in 2008.
Zaradi razlogov, ki izhajajo iz navedenih številk, je stopnja neto migracije le 0,15 %.
For reasons that are clear in the figures presented in the previous section, the net migration rate stands at just 0.15%.
Zato je zelo malo verjetno, da se bo morala Evropska unija ukvarjati z nezakonitimi priseljenci iz Tajvana.
As a result, it is very unlikely that the European Union will have to deal with any illegal immigrants from Taiwan.
Glede na podatke, ki jih je posredovala Komisija, je bilo v obdobju 2006–2008 na celotnem ozemlju Unije odkritih le 45 nezakonitih priseljencev iz Tajvana.
According to data supplied by the Commission, in 2006-2008 only 45 illegal immigrants throughout the entire European Union were found to have come from Taiwan.
Glede varnosti potovalnih dokumentov lahko rečemo, da tajvanski elektronski potni listi izpolnjujejo vse standarde, ki jih je določila Mednarodna organizacija civilnega letalstva.
As far as the security of travel documents is concerned, Taiwanese electronic passports meet all the standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization.
Pri njihovi izdelavi se uporabljajo tudi druge sodobne tehnike zaščite proti ponarejanju.
They are also produced using other modern anti-forgery techniques.
Potrditev pristnosti se izvaja z elektronskimi sistemi certificiranja.
Authentication is carried out using electronic certification systems.
Podatki o potnem listu se shranijo na mikročipe, ki se lahko prebirajo z radiofrekvenčno opremo.
Passport data are stored on microchips that can be read using radiofrequency equipment.
Shranjeni so naslednji podatki: ime in priimek (v angleškem in kitajskem jeziku), datum in kraj rojstva, številka dokumenta, datum izteka veljavnosti in podoba imetnikovega obraza.
The following details are stored: first name and surname (in English and Chinese), date and place of birth, document number, expiry date and an image of the holder’s face.
Aktualno v tujini živi približno 60.000 ljudi, ki imajo potni list, ki so ga izdale tajvanske oblasti, nimajo pa stalnega prebivališča na Tajvanu.
Currently around 60 000 people living overseas and without a permanent address in Taiwan hold a passport issued by the Taiwanese authorities.
Osebe v tem položaju nimajo nobenega tajvanskega osebnega dokumenta, kar pomeni, da morajo za vstop v državo od nacionalne agencije za priseljevanje pridobiti posebno dovoljenje.
People in this situation do not have any form of Taiwanese identity document, meaning that if they wish to enter Taiwan, they have to request a specific permit from the National Immigration Agency.
Če torej tajvanske oblasti od njih zahtevajo dovoljenje za vstop, potem bi bilo logično, da podoben ukrep za te osebe sprejme tudi Evropska unija.
It follows, therefore, that if the Taiwanese authorities require these people to produce an entry permit, the European Union should maintain a similar approach.
Izdaja vizuma je način, na katerega se legalizira vstop v državo oz. obisk države za osebe, ki niso njeni državljani in v njej nimajo stalnega prebivališča.
The visa is a way of legalising people’s entry into, or visit to, a country of which they are not nationals and in which they do not reside.
Gre za učinkovit način preprečevanja nezakonitega vstopa ali prebivanja ljudi.
It is an effective way to prevent people entering or staying in a country illegally.
Za države izvora in tranzitne države nezakonitih priseljencev navadno velja vizumska obveznost, čeprav ta ni upravičena pri državah, ki imajo zelo nizko stopnjo priseljevanja.
The countries of origin and transit of illegal immigrants are usually subject to visa requirements, although this is not justified for countries with very low rates of immigration.
Države, kot sta Združeno kraljestvo in Irska, so prav na tej podlagi odstopile od vizumske obveznosti za Tajvance (v marcu oz. juliju 2009).
It was on this basis that Member States such as the UK and Ireland waived the visa requirement for the Taiwanese (in March and July 2009 respectively).
Obveznost so preklicale tudi druge države, vključno z Japonsko, Južno Korejo, Singapurjem in Novo Zelandijo.
Other countries including Japan, South Korea, Singapore and New Zealand have also lifted the requirement.
Države članice, katerih državljani še vedno potrebujejo vizum za vstop na Tajvan, so Ciper, Romunija in Bolgarija.
The only Member States whose nationals currently require a visa to enter Taiwan are Cyprus, Romania and Bulgaria.
Tajvanske oblasti so obljubile, da bodo zanje vizumsko obveznost uradno odpravile11. novembra 2010.
The Taiwanese authorities have nevertheless undertaken to ensure that a visa waiver is in place for nationals of those countries by 11 November 2010.
Izpolnitev te obljube je bistvenega pomena.
It is vital that this commitment be honoured.
Tajvan ne pomeni grožnje Uniji glede nezakonitega priseljevanja ali javne varnosti.
Taiwan poses no threat whatsoever to the Union in terms of illegal immigration or public security.
Preklic vizumske obveznosti za Tajvan bo okrepil odnose z EU, pospešil tesnejše sodelovanje na področju kulture, izobraževanja, okolja in raziskav, ter na obeh straneh spodbudil turistično dejavnost.
Lifting the visa requirement for Taiwan will enhance trade relations with the EU, foster closer cooperation in the areas of culture, education, the environment and research, and boost tourism on both sides.
Unija bi morala preklicati vizumsko obveznost za Tajvan tudi zaradi regionalne skladnosti, saj je obveznost že preklicala za druge države in entitete v tej regiji s podobno gospodarsko rastjo, na primer Hongkong, Macao, Japonsko, Južno Korejo in Singapur.
The EU should lift the visa requirement for Taiwan for reasons of regional coherence, given that it has already waived the requirement for other countries and entities in the same part of the world and with similar economies, such as Hong Kong, Macao, Japan, South Korea and Singapore.
Evropska unija mora ukrepati sorazmerno in po načelu vzajemnosti, zato je predlog spremembe Uredbe št. 539/2001 utemeljen.
The need for EU action to be proportionate and based on reciprocity justifies the proposal to amend Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Tajvan mora do konca leta 2010 tudi izdati formalno obvestilo, da je preklical vizumsko obveznost za bolgarske, ciprske in romunske državljane.
It is also necessary for Taiwan to give formal notice that it has lifted the visa requirements for Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania by the end of 2010.