natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V prvem poročilu, ki se predloži v treh letih po začetku veljavnosti te odločbe, se predvsem navedejo tisti elementi omrežja Skupnosti, ki jih je treba izboljšati ali prilagoditi , in se predvsem oceni udeležba držav članic v omrežju CIWIN ter se preuči možnost nadgraditve omrežja CIWIN, da bi vključevalo funkcijo sistema hitrega opozarjanja.
The first report, which shall be submitted within three years after the entry into force of this Decision, shall, in particular, identify those elements of the Community network which should be improved or adapted and shall, in particular, assess the participation of each Member State in the CIWIN system as well as the possibility of upgrading CIWIN to include a rapid alert system (RAS) functionality.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 1. januarja 2009 .
This Decision shall apply as from 1 January 2009 .
Ta odločba začne veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije .
This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
(3) področje za opozorila, ki se lahko ustvari, če se v sistemu hitrega opozarjanja pošlje opozorilo, in pomeni komunikacijski kanal med dejavnostmi v zvezi z varovanjem ključne infrastrukture;
(3) Alert Areas, which may be created in the event of an alert being triggered in the RAS, and will constitute the channel of communication during CIP-related activities;
Ozadje predloga
Context of the Proposal
Ključno infrastrukturo sestavljajo materialne zmogljivosti in zmogljivosti informacijske tehnologije, omrežja, storitve in infrastrukturne zmogljivosti, katerih okvara ali uničenje bi resno vplivalo na zdravje, varnost, zaščito ali gospodarsko blaginjo državljanov ali na učinkovito delovanje vlad držav članic.
Critical infrastructures consist of those physical and information technology facilities, networks, services and assets which, if disrupted or destroyed, would have a serious impact on the health, safety, security or economic well-being of citizens or the effective functioning of governments in the Member States.
Ključna infrastruktura se razprostira čez mnoge sektorje gospodarstva, vključno z bančništvom, financami, prometom in distribucijo, energetiko, javnimi gospodarskimi službami, zdravstvom, oskrbo s hrano, komunikacijami ter vladnimi službami.
Critical infrastructures extend across many sectors of the economy, including banking and finance, transport and distribution, energy, utilities, health, food supply and communications, as well as key government services.
Vsakršne motnje ali manipulacije ključne infrastrukture morajo biti čim krajše, čim manj pogoste, obvladljive, geografsko omejene in kar najmanj škodljive za blaginjo držav članic, njihovih državljanov in Evropske unije.
Any such disruptions or manipulations of critical infrastructure should, to the extent possible, be brief, infrequent, manageable, geographically isolated and minimally detrimental to the welfare of the Member States, their citizens and the European Union.
Ključni sektorji za „življenje“ Evropske unije in držav članic so tudi prometni sistemi, telekomunikacije in energetika.
Furthermore, transport systems, telecommunication, energy are crucial sectors for the development and "life" of the EU and its Member States.
Ti sektorji so med seboj vse bolj povezani ali pa se nekatere države članice zanašajo na druge.
These sectors are more and more interconnected or some Member States rely on others.
Tehnologija se hitro razvija in včasih lahko pomanjkanje informacij povzroča težave, izmenjava najboljših praks (izkušenj, pristopov, metod, rešitev) med državami članicami pa lahko prispeva elemente za oblikovanje odziva, da bi se takšnim težavam izognili.
Technology develops quickly and sometimes the lack of information can create problems, while the exchange of best practices (experiences, approaches, techniques, solutions) among Member States could provide elements of response in order to avoid such problems.
Takšna izmenjava lahko pomaga tudi pri preprečevanju nepotrebnih stroškov ponovnega razvijanja praks, ki so bile že uspešno uporabljene v drugi državi članici.
This type of exchange could also help avoiding unnecessary costs of re-developing a similar practice already successfully implemented by another Member State.
Evropska Komisija je zato potrebo po edinstvenem sistemu, ki bi omogočal povezovanje in izmenjavo informacij o varovanju ključne infrastrukture med različnimi organi držav članic, prevedla v predlog odločbe Sveta o informacijskem omrežju za opozarjanje o ključni infrastrukturi (omrežje CIWIN).
Therefore, the need for a unique system where to connect to and share information among the different authorities in the Member States on the protection of critical infrastructure was translated by the European Commission in the format of the proposal for a Council Decision on a Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN).
Omrežje CIWIN bi delovalo kot forum za izmenjavo najboljših praks ter bi imelo možnost dodatne funkcije sistema hitrega opozarjanja.
CIWIN would function as a forum for exchange of best practices with a possible additional function of a rapid alert system.
Vzpostavitev omrežja CIWIN je bila predlagana že v sporočilu o varovanju evropskega programa za kritično infrastrukturo
The establishment of CIWIN was already put forward in the Communication on the European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)
KOM(2006) 786 konč. , v katerem je bil podrobno obrazložen horizontalni okvir za varovanje kritične infrastrukture v EU, ki je vključeval ukrepe za olajševanje izvajanja evropskega programa za kritično infrastrukturo, katerih sestavni del je bilo tudi omrežje CIWIN.
COM (2006) 786 final. , which set out the horizontal framework for the protection of critical infrastructures in the EU, comprising measures to facilitate the implementation of EPCIP, including CIWIN.
Poročevalec odobrava predlog o omrežju CIWIN in Evropskemu parlamentu svetuje, da ga podpre.
The rapporteur welcomes the CIWIN proposal and advises the European Parliament to support it.
Večjih sprememb predloga ne predvideva, čeprav meni, da bi bili potrebni nekateri popravki.
He does not foresee major changes to the proposal, thought he considers that some adjustments are needed.
Ti se tičejo zlasti odprave in morebitne naknadne ponovne obravnave funkcije sistema hitrega opozarjanja (2.1), varnosti komunikacij in ustrezne ravni zaščite, jezika in omogočanja lažjega priklica (2.2) ter nekaterih pojasnil v zvezi z besedili, kot so memorandum o soglasju, smernice za uporabo in stalna področja.
They mainly regard the elimination and possible future reconsideration of the Rapid Alert System (RAS) function (2.1.), the security of communication and the adequate level of protection, the language and the retrieving facilitation (2.2.) and finally a few clarifications on texts such as the Memorandum of understanding and the user guidelines or the fixed areas (2.3.).
Možnost sistema hitrega opozarjanja
The Rapid Alert System (RAS) Option
Poročevalec toplo pozdravlja izmenjavo informacij med organi držav članic, ki naj bi predvsem spodbujala oblikovanje primernih ukrepov za olajšanje izmenjave najboljših praks.
The rapporteur warmly welcomes the sharing of information among authorities of the Member States which should in particular stimulate the development of appropriate measures aimed at facilitating the exchange of best practices.
Predlagana sprememba predloga, s katero bi omrežje CIWIN brez možnosti sistema hitrega opozarjanja postalo varen informacijski in komunikacijski sistem, se zdi v tem trenutku korak v pravo smer.
The proposed modification of the proposal, which sets CIWIN as a secure information and communication system, without RAS option, seems the right direction at the moment.
Zagnan bo pilotski projekt, po opravljeni oceni sistema pa bo mogoče ovrednotiti omrežje CIWIN in morebiti uvesti funkcijo sistema opozarjanja.
A pilot project will be launched and after the assessment of the system it could be possible to evaluate CIWIN and possibly introduce the alert system functionality.
Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih med uporabo sistema, bodo Komisija in države članice pravzaprav lahko odločile, ali je funkcija hitrega opozarjanja potrebna, in kako jo vzpostaviti.
As a matter of fact experiences gained during the use of the system will enable the Commission and the Member States to decide whether the rapid alert function is needed and how it should be set up.
V okviru te analize bi si bilo tudi treba prizadevati za prilagoditev sistema CIWIN, da bi se izognili podvajanju in zmanjšali stroške.
This analysis should also tend to adjust the CIWIN system in order to avoid duplication and reduce costs.
Komisija predlaga uporabo omrežja S-TESTA za komuniciranje med državami članicami.
The Commission proposed the use of the S-TESTA network to communicate among the Member States.
Pokazalo se je, da je sistem ustrezno trdno grajen in zmožen na varen način podpirati in prenašati informacije.
The system proved adequately well built and able to support and carry information in a secure way.
Če bodo nadaljnji razvoj in študije pokazali, da neko drugo varno omrežje deluje bolje in zagotavlja večjo korist glede varnosti in stroškov, bo treba razmisliti o njegovem sprejetju.
If further developments or studies will demonstrate that another alternative secure network is better performing and provides more benefits in terms of both security and costs, it is to be taken in consideration for adoption.
Pojasnila glede izmenjave informacij in za uporabnika prijaznega formata omrežja CIWIN
Precisions concerning the Exchange of Information and CIWIN User Friendly Format
Pozornost je treba nameniti tudi ustrezni ravni varnosti in dostopu do informacij, zlasti občutljivih informacij.
Attention should also be paid on the right level of security and on the access to the information, sensitive one in particular.
Organi držav članic drug drugemu prav gotovo zaupajo, v nekaterih primerih pa si lahko ti organi izmenjujejo informacije tudi z zasebnim sektorjem ali s tretjimi državami (tretjimi osebami).
There is certainly a mutual trust among authorities of the Member States, but in some cases these authorities may share information also with private sector or third countries (third parties).
Zato poročevalec meni, da bi bilo treba pri vnašanju informacij v omrežje CIWIN omogočiti lastniku specifičnih informacij, da izmenjavo s temi tretjimi osebami pogojuje s svojim osebnim dovoljenjem.
To this end, the rapporteur believes that when uploading the information on CIWIN it should be possible for the owner of the specific information to condition the exchange with these third parties to his specific authorisation.
Čeprav lahko pričakujemo, da bodo pravila o prenosu informacij, ki jih vsebuje omrežje CIWIN, jasno navedena v smernicah za uporabo, se zdi potrebno vključiti v predlog določbo, ki jasno opredeljuje, kako tretje osebe dostopajo do takšnih informacij.
Although it can be expected that the rules on the transmission of information contained in CIWIN will be clearly specified in the user guidelines, it seems necessary to insert a provision in the proposal clearly specifying how third parties can access such information.
Naslednji temeljni vidik omrežja CIWIN je povezan z jezikom.
Another fundamental aspect of the CIWIN system concerns the language.
Da bi sistem dobro deloval, morajo biti informacije lahko dostopne in razumljive.
In order to function properly the information should be easily accessible and understood.
Ko bodo nacionalni uporabniki vnesli informacije ali dokumente, bo v ta namen zagotovljeno avtomatsko prevajanje.
To this end an automatic translation shall be provided after the national users have uploaded the information or the documents.
Da bi olajšali iskanje informacij v sistemu, bi morala Komisija skupaj s kontaktnimi točkami za varovanje ključne infrastrukture izdelati specifična tematska iskalna polja („ključne besede“).
To facilitate the research of information throughout the system, the Commission together with the CIP contact points should elaborate specific thematic research boxes ("key words").
Pri vnašanju informacij v omrežje CIWIN ali priklicevanju informacij bi uporabniki odkljukali zadevno polje (ali polja).
When inserting or retrieving information on CIWIN then, the users will tick the box (or the boxes) concerned.
To bi drugim uporabnikom olajšalo iskanje informacij.
This will facilitate the research of information for the other users.
Ta polja bi vsebovala splošne kategorije, ki so skupne za vse uporabnike (prevedene v vse jezike) in o katerih bi se dogovorile države članice.
These boxes will contain general categories common for all the users (translated in each language) and agreed among the Member States.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba jasno opredeliti, s katerim postopkom se sprejemajo besedila, navedena v predlogu (memorandum o soglasju, smernice za uporabo).
The rapporteur considers that it is important to clearly specify by which procedure a series of texts referred to in the proposal (Memorandum of understanding, User guidelines) should be adopted.
Zato v tem osnutku poročila predlaga svetovalni postopek, predviden v členu 3 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil.
To this end, the advisory procedure provided by Article 3 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission has been proposed in this draft report.
Glede stalnih področij, predvidenih v predlogu, pa poročevalec meni, da bi bilo treba omogočiti relativno prožnost, se pravi dopustiti možnost, da bo v pilotski fazi ali celo v fazi ovrednotenja sistema prišlo do ugotovitev, ki bodo govorile v prid potrebi po vzpostavitvi novih stalnih področij v omrežju CIWIN.
Furthermore, concerning the fixed areas foreseen by the proposal, the rapporteur considers that a relative flexibility should be allowed in the sense that the pilot phase or the assessment of the system itself could provide findings supporting the necessity of creating new fixed areas into CIWIN.
Iz tega razloga so bile prav v zvezi s to točko predloga predlagane spremembe.
This is why the proposal has been amended in this specific point.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga odločbe Sveta o informacijskem omrežju za opozarjanje o ključni infrastrukturi (CIWIN) ( KOM(2008)0676 – C6‑0399/2008 – 2008/0200(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a Council Decision on a Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN) ( COM(2008)0676 – C6‑0399/2008 – 2008/0200(CNS) )
Spoštovani gospod predsednik
Dear Mr Deprez,
V pismu z dne 30. januarja 2009 ste v skladu s členom 35(2) poslovnika Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosili za mnenje o točnosti pravne podlage omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 30 January 2009 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2) to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid.
Odbor je omenjeno vprašanje obravnaval na seji dne 31. marca 2009.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 31 March 2009.
30. januarja 2009 ste se v skladu s členom 35(2) poslovnika z odborom posvetovali glede primerne pravne podlage predloga odločbe Sveta o informacijskem omrežju za opozarjanje o ključni infrastrukturi (CIWIN).
On 30 January 2009, you consulted the committee pursuant to Rule 35(2) of the Rules of Procedure on the appropriate legal basis for the proposed Council decision on the Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN).
Komisija je kot pravno podlago predlagala člen 308 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in člen 203 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo.
At present, the Commission is proposing Article 308 EC and Article 203 Euratom as the legal basis.
Vaše vprašanje je bilo, ali naj se ne bi uporabljal samo člen 308 ES, ki ga Sodišče razlaga precej strogo.
You asked whether Article 308 EC alone, which the Court interprets relatively strictly, ought not to be used.
Drugo vprašanje je bilo v zvezi s stanjem, če bi lizbonska pogodba že veljala.
You went on to ask what the position would be in the Lisbon Treaty were in force.
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine je vprašanji posredoval tudi pravni službi Evropskega parlamenta ter dodal še vprašanje o tem, ali bi člen 154 ES o vseevropskih omrežjih lahko bil pravna podlaga za CIWIN v primeru, da bo ustrezna ključna infrastruktura predvsem ali izključno spadala na področja iz Pogodbe ES (promet, telekomunikacije in energetika).
The Civil Liberties Committee also put these questions to Parliament’s Legal Service and followed them up by a further question as to whether Article 154 EC on trans-European networks would be envisageable as the legal basis for the CIWIN if the critical infrastructure in question were to fall primarily or exclusively within the fields indicated by the Treaty (transport, telecommunications and energy).
Vaše naslednje vprašanje je bilo, ali bi v primeru, da odločba ne bi bila sprejeta pred začetkom veljave lizbonske pogodbe, člen 169 PDEU o „civilni zaščiti“ lahko bil najprimernejša pravna podlaga, saj je ukrep namenjen podpori, usklajevanju in dopolnjevanju ukrepanja držav članic.
You then asked whether, in the event that the decision was not adopted before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the most appropriate legal basis might not be Article 196 TFEU on “civil protection” in so far as the measure is apt to support, coordinate or complement action by the Member States.
Glede vprašanja uporabe obeh členov, tj. člena 308 ES in člena 203 Euratom, ali samo člena 308 kot primerne pravne podlage predloga odločbe je pravna služba Evropskega parlamenta ugotovila, da je predlagan pravni instrument pomanjkljiv, ker bi vzpostavitev ključne infrastrukture sicer bila skladna s cilji Evropske skupnosti in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo (s tega vidika bi bila predlagana pravna podlaga ustrezna), vendar pa je pravne učinke predloga odločbe in s tem njegovo pravno podlago mogoče oceniti samo na predpostavki, da v CIWIN ne bo sodelovala nobena država članica, saj je njihovo sodelovanje prostovoljno.
When consulted on the question whether Article 308 EC and Article 203 Euratom, or Article 308 alone, afforded an appropriate legal basis for the proposed decision, Parliament’s Legal Service reached the conclusion that the proposed instrument is defective in that, although the creation of a critical infrastructure would pursue objectives of the European Community and Euratom (and the proposed legal basis could be feasible), the legal effects of the proposed decision and hence its legal basis can only be assessed on the assumption that no Member State will participate in the CIWIN, since Member State participation is voluntary.
Na prvi pogled predlog odločbe ni skladen z načelom sorazmernosti in zahtevo o navedbi razlogov.
On the face of it, therefore, the proposed decision fails to comply with the principle of proportionality and the requirement to state reasons.
Nobenega razloga ni, da ta skrbno pripravljena in utemeljena analiza pravne službe ne bi bila pravilna.
There is every reason to consider that this carefully reasoned analysis carried out by the Legal Service is correct.
Glede na sedanje stanje torej predlog, kakršen je, nima ustrezne pravne podlage.
Consequently, as matters stand, there is no viable legal basis for the proposal as it stands, since it is flawed.
Odgovor na prvo vprašanje Odbora za državljanske svoboščine se zato glasi, da niti oba člena skupaj, tj. člen 308 ES in člen 203Euratom, niti člen 308 ES sam, ne zadostuje kot pravna podlaga za odločbo, kakor jo je predlagala Komisija.
The answer to the Civil Liberties Committee’s first question, therefore, is that neither Article 308 EC in conjunction with Article 203 Euratom nor Article 308 EC alone affords a sufficient legal basis for the decision as proposed by the Commission.
Člen 308 ES bi vseeno lahko bil primerna pravna podlaga, če bi bili sprejeti predlogi sprememb Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, po katerih sodelovanje pri omrežju ne bi bilo več prostovoljno.
However, if amendments tabled in the Civil Liberties Committee which would result in participation in the network no longer being voluntary were to be adopted, it is considered that Article 308 EC would be appropriate as the legal basis.
Ta ugotovitev temelji na dejstvu, da noben drug člen Pogodbe ES ne bi ustrezal kot pravna podlaga in da bi se med delovanjem skupnega trga lahko izkazalo, da je zaradi doseganja enega od ciljev Skupnosti v smislu tega člena treba sprejeti CIWIN (če sodelovanje držav članic ne bo več popolnoma samostojno).
This conclusion is based on the fact that no other article of the EC Treaty would afford an appropriate legal basis and that adoption of CIWIN (if Member State participation therein is no longer purely voluntary) may be considered to be "necessary to attain, in the course of the operation of the common market, one of the objectives of the Community" within the meaning of that article.
Odgovor na vprašanje o tem, ali bi bil pravna podlaga za CIWIN lahko člen 154 ES o vseevropskih omrežjih, če bi ta predvsem ali izključno obravnaval področja prometa, telekomunikacij in energetike, zato ni potreben.
It is therefore unnecessary to answer the question as to whether Article 154 EC on trans-European networks could constitute the legal basis for the CIWIN if it were to be primarily or exclusively concerned with transport, telecommunications and energy.
Glede stanja po začetku veljave lizbonske pogodbe Odbor za pravne zadeve meni, da je to vprašanje trenutno povsem hipotetično in zato nanj ni treba odgovoriti.
As far as the position after the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force is concerned, the Legal Affairs Committee considers that this question is purely hypothetical at present and therefore does not need to be answered.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na svoji seji dne 31. marca 2009 soglasno
At its meeting of 31 March 2009 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Giuseppe Gargani (predsedujoči), Rainer Wieland (podpredsedujoči), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (podpredsedujoča), Francesco Enrico Speroni (podpredsedujoči), Monica Frassoni (poročevalka), Carlo Casini, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine, Neena Gill, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Véronique Mathieu, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Hartmut Nassauer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Eva-Riitta Siitonen, Jacques Toubon, Diana Wallis, Renate Weber in Jaroslav Zvěřina. sklenil priporočiti, da je primerna pravna podlaga člen 308 Pogodbe ES.
The following were present for the final vote: Giuseppe Gargani (Chair), Rainer Wieland (Vice-Chair), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (Vice-Chair), Francesco Enrico Speroni (Vice-Chair), Monica Frassoni (rapporteur), Carlo Casini, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine, Neena Gill, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Véronique Mathieu, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Hartmut Nassauer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Eva-Riitta Siitonen, Jacques Toubon, Diana Wallis, Renate Weber, Jaroslav Zvěřina. , to recommend that Article 308 of the EC Treaty is the appropriate legal basis.
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o potrditvi Konvencije Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov s strani Evropske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov .....................................9
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY.....9
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2008)0530 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2008)0530 ),
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov („konvencija“), sprejete13. decembra 2006
– having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ("the Convention"), adopted on 13 December 2006