natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V petnajstih delovnih dneh revizijski svetovalec pošlje generalnemu direktorju svoje mnenje o tem, ali je preiskava v teku skladna s členom 6(5), in o razlogih, ki jih je podal generalni direktor Urada za podaljšanje preiskave, skupaj s priporočili, za katera meni, da so koristna za nadaljnji potek preiskave.
Within fifteen working days the Review Adviser shall send the Director ‑General his opinion on whether the investigation in progress complies with Article 6(5) and on the reasons given by the Director ‑General for extending the investigation, together with any recommendations he considers useful for the further conduct of the investigation.
Revizijski svetovalec pošlje izvod svojega mnenja generalnemu tajniku zadevne institucije, organa, urada ali agencije ter nadzornemu odboru.
The Review Adviser shall send a copy of his opinion to the Secretary ‑General of the institution, body, office or agency concerned and to the Supervisory Committee.
Generalni direktor Urada se prepriča, ali je treba podaljšati preiskavo.
The Direc tor Gen eral of the Office shall ascertain the need for the investigation to be extended.
Preden sprejme to odločitev, generalni direktor obvesti nadzorni odbor o razlogih, zaradi katerih še ni bilo mogoče zaključiti preiskave, in o pričakovanem roku za zaključek preiskave.
Before taking this decision, the Direc tor Gen eral shall inform the Supervisory Committee of the reasons preventing the investigation from being concluded and of the likely period of time needed for it to be completed.
Take odločitve o podaljšanju se po potrebi lahko ponovijo pod enakimi pogoji.
If necessary, further such extension decisions may be taken, subject to the same conditions.”
Če se preiskava ne zaključi v 18 mesecih po njenem začetku, generalni direktor obvesti nadzorni odbor o razlogih, zaradi katerih še ni bilo mogoče zaključiti preiskave in, če je potrebno, o nadaljnjem poteku preiskave.
If an investigation is not completed within 18 months after it has been opened, the Supervisory Committee shall be informed by the Direc tor Gen eral of the reasons which have prevented him from closing the investigation and shall issue an opinion on the extension (and where approp ria te the subsequent conduct) of the investigation.
Nadzorni odbor posreduje kopijo svojega mnenja zadevni instituciji, organu ali uradu.
The Supervisory Committee shall forward a copy of its opinion to the institution, body, office or agency concerned.
Informacija se lahko odloži v primerih, ko je treba zaradi preiskave ohraniti popolno tajnost ali v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za preiskave.
It may defer the forwarding of its opinion in cases requiring absolute secrecy to be maintained for the purposes of the investigation or in accordance with the national law applicable to investigations.
Generalni direktor Urada vsako leto predloži proračunskemu organu poročilo o razlogih, zaradi katerih ni bilo mogoče zaključiti preiskav v 30 mesecih od njihovega začetka.
The Direc tor Gen eral of the Office shall submit to the budgetary authority an annual report on the reasons which have prevented him from closing investigations within 3 0 months after they have been opened.
Nadzorni odbor posreduje proračunskemu organu mnenje o teh razlogih.
The Supervisory Committee shall submit an opinion on those reasons to the budgetary authority.
Odgovornost, da se preiskavi podaljša rok nad 12 mesecev, mora biti v pristojnosti generalnega direktorja.
Responsibility for extending an investigation beyond 12 months should rest with the Director General.
Če se preiskave ne more zaključiti v 24 mesecih, je treba predvideti možnost, da nadzorni odbor posreduje mnenje generalnemu direktorju.
If the investigation cannot be concluded within 24 months, it is necessary to lay down that the Supervisory Committee may submit an opinion to the Director General.
To mnenje je treba posredovati tudi zainteresirani instituciji, da se seznani, v kateri fazi se nahaja preiskava.
This opinion must be forwarded to the institution concerned to inform it of the progress of the investigation, subject to exceptions.
4a) Člen 7(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
( 4 a) Article 7 (1) is replaced by the following text :
Institucije, organi, uradi in agencije morajo uradu takoj poslati vse podatke v zvezi z morebitnimi primeri goljufije ali korupcije ali drugih nezakonitih dejanj , ki škodijo finančnim interesom Skupnosti . “
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall forward to the Office without delay any information relating to possible cases of fraud or corruption or any other illegal activity detrimental to the financial interests of the European Community. '
Nezakonita ravnanja, ki se sporočajo Uradu, je treba omejiti na tista, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Skupnosti.
It is desirable to indicate that illegal activities which may be the subject of a communication to OLAF should be confined to those which are detrimental to the financial interests of the Community.
Gre za opredelitev pristojnosti Urada.
This clarifies the field of responsibility of OLAF.
Člen 1 – točka 4 b (novo)
Article 1 – point 4 b
4b) Člen 7(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
( 4b) Article 7(2) is replaced by the following text:
Institucije, organi, uradi in agencije in, če to dopušča nacionalna zakonodaja, države članice na zahtevo urada ali na svojo pobudo pošljejo uradu vse dokumente ali podatke v zvezi z [...] preiskavo v teku, s katerimi razpolagajo. “
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and, in so far as national law allows, the Member States shall, at the request of the Office or on their own initiative, forward any document or information they hold which relates to a current investigation. "
Treba je določiti, da institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Skupnosti, ter, v skladu z njihovo nacionalno zakonodajo, države članice, Uradu posredujejo vse dokumente in informacije v zvezi s preiskavo, ki je v teku, ne glede na to, ali je notranja ali zunanja.
It is desirable to stipulate that Community institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, as well as Member States, in accordance with their national law, are to forward to OLAF any document or information concerning current investigations, without any distinction between internal and external investigations.
Člen 7 a – odstavek 1
Article 7 a – paragraph 1
Urad v svoji preiskavi išče dokaze za in proti zadevni osebi.
In its investigation the Office shall seek evidence for and against the person concerned.
Preiskave potekajo objektivno in nepristransko ter ob upoštevanju načela domneve nedolžnosti in postopkovnih jamstev, ki jih podrobno določajo postopkovna pravila iz člena 15a.
Investigations shall be conducted objectively and impartially and in accordance with the principle of the presumption of innocence and the procedural guarantees set out in the Procedural Code referred to in Article 15a.
Zaradi zakonodaje Skupnosti s tega področja je treba določiti, da se morajo preiskave Urada izvajati ob upoštevanju določenih postopkovnih načel in posameznih pravic.
In view of the relevant Community case law, it should be stated that OLAF investigations must be conducted in accordance with certain procedural principles and individual rights.
Člen 7 a – odstavek 2
Article 7a – paragraph 2
Če preiskava pokaže, da bi lahko bil član, vodilni delavec, uradnik ali drugi uslužbenec ali oseba v službi institucije, organa, urada ali agencije ali gospodarskega subjekta vpleten v zadevo, se zadevna oseba obvesti, pod pogojem, da to ne ovira poteka preiskave.
As soon as an investigation reveals that a member, manager, official or other servant or a person serving an institution, body, office or agency or an economic operator may be implicated in a matter, the person concerned shall be informed, provided that this does not prejudice the conduct of the investigation.
Če preiskava pokaže, da bi lahko bil član, vodilni delavec, uradnik ali drugi uslužbenec ali oseba v službi institucije, organa, urada ali agencije ali gospodarskega subjekta vpleten v zadevo, se zadevno osebo obvesti, pod pogojem, da to ne ovira poteka preiskave.
As soon as an investigation reveals that a member, manager, official or other servant or a person serving an institution, body, office or agency or an economic operator may be implicated in a matter, the person concerned shall be informed, provided that this does not prejudice the conduct of the investigation.
V vsakem primeru pa se ob zaključku preiskave ne smejo sestaviti sklepi, v katerih bi bila fizična ali pravna oseba navedena po imenu, če vpletena oseba ni imela možnosti predložiti svojih stališč v zvezi z vsem, kar jo zadeva.
In any event, no conclusions referring by name to a natural or legal person may be drawn on completion of an investigation unless the person thus personally implicated has been given the opportunity to make his views known on all matters concerning him.
Vpletena oseba mora skupaj s povabilom, naj odda pripombe, prejeti povzetek takih zadev .
That person must be given a summary of such matters in the invitation to comment.
Pomaga ji lahko oseba po lastni izbiri.
He is entitled to be assisted by a person of his choice.
Vpletena oseba lahko sama izbere uradni jezik Skupnosti, ki ga želi uporabljati; vendar pa se od uradnikov ali drugih uslužbencev Skupnosti lahko zahteva, da uporabljajo tisti uradni jezik Skupnosti, ki ga zelo dobro obvladajo.
Any person implicated personally is entitled to use the official Community language of his choice; however, officials or other servants of the Communities may be asked to use an official Community language of which they have a thorough knowledge.
Vpletena fizična ali pravna oseba ima pravico, da se izogne samoobtožbi.
A person implicated personally shall be entitled to avoid self incrimination.
V vsakem primeru pa se pred pripravo končnega poročila o preiskavi ob zaključku preiskave ne smejo sestaviti sklepi, v katerih bi bila fizična ali pravna oseba navedena po imenu, če vpletena oseba ni imela možnosti predložiti svojih stališč v zvezi z vsem, kar jo zadeva , v pisni obliki ali v razgovoru s pristojnim uslužbencem Urada .
In any event, before the investigation’s final report is drawn up no conclusions referring by name to a natural or legal person may be drawn on completion of an investigation unless the person thus personally implicated has been given the opportunity to make his views known , in writing or at an interview with employees designated by the Office, on all matters concerning him.
Vpletena oseba mora skupaj s povabilom, naj odda pripombe, prejeti povzetek takih zadev , sama pa predloži svoje ugotovitve v roku, ki ga določi Urad.
The person concerned must be given a summary of such matters in the invitation to comment and shall submit his comments within the time-limits indicated by the Office .
Na razgovoru ji lahko pomaga oseba po lastni izbiri.
In an interview he is entitled to be assisted by a person of his choice.
V primerih, ko je treba zaradi preiskave ohranjati strogo tajnost in ko je treba uporabljati preiskovalne metode, ki spadajo v pristojnost nacionalnih sodnih organov ali, v primeru zunanje preiskave, pristojnega nacionalnega organa , lahko generalni direktor Urada odloči, da bo odložil izpolnjevanje obveznosti, da vpleteni osebi da možnost predstaviti svoje mnenje.
In cases requiring absolute secrecy to be maintained for the sake of the investigation and entailing use of investigative proceedings falling under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority or, in the case of an external investigation, that of a competent national authority, the Director General of the Office may decide to defer fulfilment of the obligation to ask the person implicated to make his views known.
Najprej bo obvestil revizijskega svetovalca, ki bo predložil mnenje v skladu s členom 14(3).
He shall first notify the Review Adviser, who shall give an opinion in accordance with Article 14(3) .
V primeru notranje preiskave generalni direktor sprejme odločitev sporazumno z institucijo, organom, uradom ali agencijo, kateri pripada zadevna oseba.
In the case of an internal investigation, the Director General of the Office shall take his decision in agreement with the institution, body, office or agency to which the person concerned belongs.
V primerih, ko je treba zaradi preiskave ohranjati strogo tajnost ali ko je treba uporabljati preiskovalne metode, ki v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za preiskave, spadajo v pristojnost nacionalnih sodnih organov, lahko generalni direktor Urada odloči, da bo odložil izpolnjevanje obveznosti, da vpleteni osebi da možnost predstaviti svoje mnenje ob upoštevanju določb v zvezi s preverjanjem zakonitosti iz člena 14 .
In cases requiring absolute secrecy to be maintained for the sake of the investigation or entailing use of investigative proceedings falling under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority or, in the case of an external investigation, that of a competent national authority, the Director General of the Office may decide to defer fulfilment of the obligation to ask the person implicated to make his views known , while complying with the provisions on reviewing legality laid down in Article 14 .
V primeru notranje preiskave generalni direktor sprejme odločitev potem, ko je o tem obvestil institucijo, organ, urad ali agencijo, kateri pripada zadevna oseba.
In the case of an internal investigation, the Director General of the Office shall take his decision in agreement with the institution, body, office or agency to which the person concerned belongs.
Institucija, organ, urad ali agencija odloči, ali so potrebni morebitni previdnostni ali upravni ukrepi, z ustreznim upoštevanjem pomena jamčenja učinkovitosti vodenja preiskave in posebnih ukrepov za varstvo zaupnosti, ki jih je predlagal Urad.
The institution, body, office or agency shall where necessary decide on the expediency of any precautionary or administrative measures, taking due account of the interest of securing the effectiveness of the investigation’s conduct and of any particular confidentiality measures that the Office has recommended.
Institucija, organ ali urad v najkrajšem času seznani Urad s svojo odločitvijo o ukrepih iz tega člena ali o potrebi po uvedbi dodatnega disciplinskega postopka v zadevah, za katere so institucija, organ ter urad ali agencija pristojni na podlagi kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti.
The institution, body, office or agency shall inform the Office as soon as possible of the decision to take any measures under this Article or, where approp ria te, of the need to initiate an additional disciplinary procedure on matters for which there is approp ria te competence under the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities.
Ta določba za osebo, o kateri poteka preiskava, določa temeljno pravico, da predstavi svoja stališča v zvezi z zaključki končnega poročila o preiskavi, preden je sprejeto.
This provision introduces the fundamental right for persons subject to investigation to submit comments on the conclusions of the investigation’s final report before it is adopted.
V skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za preiskave, določa tudi izjeme, tako kot po preverjanju zakonitosti.
It also lays down the exceptions in accordance with the national law applicable to investigations, and after carrying out the review of legality.
Člen 7 a – odstavek 3
Article 7a – paragraph 3
Povabilo na razgovor, s pričo ali z osebo, ki je vpletena v smislu odstavka 1, mora biti poslano vsaj osem delovnih dni vnaprej; ta rok se lahko skrajša s soglasjem osebe, ki prihaja na razgovor.
The invitation to any interview, whether with a witness or with a person implicated personally within the meaning of paragraph 2, must be sent with at least eight working days’ notice; the period of notice may be shortened with the agreement of the person to be interviewed.
Povabilo vsebuje seznam pravic osebe, ki prihaja na razgovor.
The invitation shall include a list of the rights of the person interviewed.
Urad sestavi zapisnik razgovora in osebi, ki je prišla na razgovor, zagotovi dostop do zapisnika, tako da lahko zapisnik potrdi ali doda pripombe.
The Office shall draw up a record of the interview and shall give the person interviewed access to it so that he may either approve the record or add observations.
Poziv na razgovor, s pričo ali z osebo, ki je vpletena v smislu odstavka 1, mora biti poslan vsaj deset delovnih dni vnaprej; ta rok se lahko skrajša z izrecnim soglasjem osebe, ki je bila pozvana na razgovor.
The invitation to any interview, whether with a witness or with a person implicated personally within the meaning of paragraph 2, must be sent with at least ten working days’ notice; the period of notice may be shortened with the express consent of the person to be interviewed.
Če se med razgovorom izkaže, da bi lahko bila oseba, ki je prišla na razgovor, vpletena v dejstva, ki so predmet preiskave, se takoj začnejo uporabljati postopkovna pravila iz odstavka 2.
When, in the course of the interview, it transpires that the person interviewed may be involved in the facts under investigation, the procedural rules provided for in paragraph 2 shall apply at once.
Če se med razgovorom izkaže, da bi lahko bila oseba, ki je prišla na razgovor, vpletena v dejstva, ki so predmet preiskave, se takoj začnejo uporabljati postopkovna pravila iz odstavka 2.
When, in the course of the interview, evidence emerges that the person interviewed may be involved in the facts under investigation, the procedural rules provided for in paragraph 2 shall apply at once.
Treba je predvideti razumno daljši rok.
The period of notice should be longer.
Poleg tega je treba, od trenutka, ko v preiskavo osebno vpletena oseba že koristi takšna jamstva, pojasniti, da je lahko samo oseba, ki je zaslišana kot priča, obravnavana kot vpleteno v zadevna dejanja, in da se uporabljajo jamstva, predvidena v členu 7a(2).
Also, as procedural guarantees already apply to persons implicated personally, the wording should make it clear that the procedural guarantees provided for in Article 7a(2) apply only to persons interviewed as witnesses who could be regarded as involved in the facts under investigation.
Člen 7 a – odstavek 4
Article 7a – paragraph 4
Postopkovna jamstva iz tega člena se uporabljajo brez poseganja:
The procedural guarantees provided for in this Article shall apply without prejudice:
a) v morebitno širšo zaščito, ki bi lahko bila na voljo na podlagi pravil Pogodbe in katerih koli ustreznih nacionalnih predpisov ;
(a) to more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties or any relevant national provisions;
a) v morebitno širšo zaščito, ki bi lahko bila na voljo na podlagi pravil Pogodbe , Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije in katerih koli drugih ustreznih nacionalnih predpisov ali predpisov Skupnosti, vključno s Protokolom o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti ;
(a) to more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties , the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union or any other relevant national or Community provisions , including the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities ;
b) v pravice in obveznosti iz Kadrovskih predpisov.
(b) to rights and obligations conferred by the Staff Regulations.
b) v pravice in obveznosti iz Kadrovskih predpisov poslancev Evropskega parlamenta oziroma uradnikov Evropskih skupnosti .
(b) to rights and obligations conferred by the Statute for Members of the European Parliament or the Staff Regulations of O fficials of the European Communities .
Z večjo natančnostjo je treba navesti, kateri so viri širših jamstev, ki se nanašajo na osebe, ki so vpletene v preiskavo.
The possible sources of more extensive guarantees for persons implicated in an investigation should be indicated in greater detail.
Člen 7 b
Article 7 b
Če se do zaključka preiskave ne najdejo nobeni dokazi zoper osumljenega člana, vodstvenega delavca, zoper gospodarski subjekt, se z odločitvijo generalnega direktorja Urada, ki pisno obvesti zadevno osebo in, če je primerno, institucijo, organ, urad ali agencijo, preiskava proti navedeni osebi zaključi in se ne sprejmejo nadaljnji ukrepi.
If, on completion of an investigation, no evidence has been found against a member, manager, official or other servant or person serving an institution, body, office or agency or against an economic operator, the investigation into that person shall be closed and no further action taken, by decision of the Director General of the Office, who shall inform the person concerned and, where appropriate, the institution, body, office or agency in writing.
Če se do zaključka preiskave ne najdejo nobeni dokazi zoper osumljenega člana, vodstvenega delavca, zoper gospodarski subjekt, se z odločitvijo generalnega direktorja Urada, ki v desetih delovnih dneh od sprejetja odločitve pisno obvesti zadevno osebo in, če je primerno, institucijo, organ, urad ali agencijo, preiskava proti navedeni osebi zaključi in se ne sprejmejo nadaljnji ukrepi.
If, on completion of an investigation, no evidence has been found against a member, manager, official or other servant or person serving an institution, body, office or agency or against an economic operator, the investigation into that person shall be closed and no further action taken, by decision of the Director General of the Office, who shall , within ten working days of the decision being taken, inform the person concerned and, where appropriate, the institution, body, office or agency in writing.
Treba je poudariti, da se morajo po zaključku preiskave brez nadaljnjih ukrepov zainteresirane osebe in v primeru javnega uslužbenca institucija, kjer je zaposlen, čim prej obvestiti o zaključkih preiskave.
It should be stressed that, following an investigation which has not produced results, the people concerned and, in the case of an official, the institution to which he belongs, can be informed of the conclusion of the investigation as soon as possible.
Člen 17 c (novo)
Article 7 c (new)
„Člen 7c
"Article 7 c
Za nepristransko obveščanje evropskih davkoplačevalcev in za zagotavljanje svobode tiska morajo vsi organi Evropske unije, ki sodelujejo pri dejavnostih preiskav, spoštovati načelo zaščite novinarskih virov.
To make it possible to provide objective information to European taxpayers and in order to guarantee freedom of the press, all EU bodies involved in the investigation must respect the principle of protecting journalists' sources in accordance with national legislation ."
Zadeva „Tillack“, v kateri je bil nemški novinar predmet sodno preganjan, potem ko je razkril korupcijo pri enem od organov Evropske unije, je dokaz o resnem pomanjkanju zaščite virov znotraj institucij Evropske unije.
The 'Tillack' affair, in which judicial abuses were committed against a German journalist who had revealed corruption in the operations of an EU agency, is indicative of serious shortcomings in the protection of sources within the EU institutions.
Svoboda obveščanja in svoboda izražanja novinarjev, ki raziskujejo, kako institucije Evropske unije upravljajo z evropskimi sredstvi, morata biti jasno zagotovljeni, kot je Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice zapisalo v sodbi z dne 27. novembra 2007.
Journalists' freedom to report information and their right to freedom of speech when scrutinising the use to which EU institutions put European taxpayers' money must be clearly guaranteed, as the European Court of Human Rights ruled in its judgment of 27 November 2007.
Člen 8 a – alinea 2
Article 8 a – subparagraph 2
Generalni direktor Urada lahko odloči, da ne bo poslal obvestila iz prvega pododstavka v primerih, ko je nujno treba ohraniti popolno tajnost in uporabiti preiskovalne ukrepe, ki so v pristojnosti nacionalne sodne oblasti.
The Director General of the Office may decide not to make the communication referred to in the first subparagraph in cases requiring the maintenance of absolute secrecy and use of investigative measures that fall under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority.