natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Natančneje, z okrepitvijo dialoga ILO je mogoče upoštevati nekatere temeljne pravice, povezane spoštovanjem socialnih standardov.
Thus, it is perhaps more specifically by stepping up the dialogue with the ILO that certain fundamentals linked to respect for social standards can be taken into account.
Vloga ILO bi zato morala biti okrepljena in bi morala imeti organ za tolmačenje standardov.
To this end the role of the ILO should be reinforced and it should also have a standards interpretation body.
Poleg dejstva, da se priporoča, da je spoštovanje vseh glavnih standardov ILO obvezno, pa je treba na to organizacijo nasloviti vprašanja o temeljnih pravicah na področju dela v okviru reševanja mednarodnih pravnih sporov, vključno s trgovinskimi spori (v obliki predhodnega odločanja WTO in ILO).
Apart from the fact that universal, mandatory compliance with the main ILO standards is recommended, the ILO should also be referred to on issues of fundamental labour rights in the context of settlement of international disputes, including trade disputes (in the form of preliminary referral by the WTO to the ILO).
Čeprav se na trgovinskem področju še vedno premalo upošteva socialne standarde, pa so, na okoljskem področju trgovinski ukrepi, ki jih določajo večstranski okoljski sporazumi za doseganje okoljskih ciljev, in se z večstranskim soglasjem smatrajo za zakonite ter niso samo prikrito omejevanje trgovine, vključeni med izjeme, predvidene v členu XX Splošnega sporazuma o tarifah in trgovini.
Although the issue of trade taking account of social standards is still a minor one, with regard to the environment, the trade measures required by multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) to achieve environmental objectives which are considered ‘legitimate’ by multilateral consensus, and which are not just disguised restrictions on trade, now seem to be considered as part of the exceptions under Article XX of the GATT.
Na koncu pa bi bilo v okviru okoljskega vprašanja primerno ustanoviti posebno svetovno organizacijo.
Finally, on the environmental question, a specific world organisation should be set up.
Če bi bile njene naloge dobro opredeljene in pojasnjene v odnosu do drugih mednarodnih organizacij, kot je WTO, in če bi lahko delovala na podlagi skupno sprejetih načel, bi lahko bila ta organizacija, ki bi se imenovala svetovna okoljska organizacija, odgovorna za opredeljevanje in izvajanje okoljskih standardov.
If, like the WTO, its mandate is well-defined and clear in relation to the other international organisations, and if it allows it to act on the basis of commonly agreed principles, this organisation, known as the World Environment Organisation, could be responsible for defining and implementing environmental standards.
Tako bi se lahko nanjo obrnili za reševanje primerov okoljskega dumpinga.
Cases of environmental dumping could be referred to it.
Glede vprašanja človekovih pravic pa bi bilo treba vzpostaviti povečano večstransko sodelovanje med WTO in osrednjimi institucijami Organizacije združenih narodov na področju človekovih pravic.
On the human rights question, increased cooperation should finally be set up at multilateral level between the WTO and the main United Nations human rights institutions.
Izkušnje Visokega komisariata pa bi se lahko na primer upoštevale pri delu skupin pri WTO in prizivnega organa v primeru ugotovljenih resnih kršitev človekovih pravic.
The expertise of the High Commissioner’s office could for example be taken into account in WTO panels and its appeals body when serious breaches of human rights are observed.
Vprašanje obvezne uporabe teh standardov v dvostranskih trgovinskih sporazumih je izredno občutljivo in poudarja zmožnost ali nezmožnost Evropske unije, da naloži uporabo in upoštevanje teh standardov.
The question of compulsory application of these standards in bilateral trade agreements is particularly sensitive and puts the spotlight on whether the European Union does or does not have the capacity to impose application of and compliance with these standards.
Pri dvostranskih pogajanjih, ki so se nedavno zaključila oziroma še potekajo, si Unija prizadeva za vključitev socialnih standardov v prostotrgovinske sporazume, vendar včasih naleti na nasprotovanja nekaterih držav, ker naj bi ti standardi predstavljali protekcionistične ovire.
In recently concluded or still ongoing bilateral negotiations, the EU is concerned to include social standards in free trade agreements, but sometimes it comes up against hostility from some countries on the grounds that they would constitute protectionist barriers.
Unija ima težave tudi z državami, ki, čeprav so podpisnice konvencij ILO, ne spoštujejo sindikalnih pravic.
The EU is also encountering difficulties with countries which, although they are signatories to the ILO conventions, do not respect trade union rights.
Vendar pa je bil v okviru prostotrgovinskih sporazumov opažen dejanski napredek pri pogajanjih o poglavjih, ki se nanašajo na trajnostni razvoj.
Nevertheless, concrete developments have been seen within free trade agreements (FTAs) with the negotiation of chapters on sustainable development.
Temeljno načelo nekaterih prostotrgovinskih sporazumov pa je, da se strani zavežejo k spoštovanju človekovih pravic in razvoju trajnostnega gospodarstva, ki temelji na varstvu in spodbujanju pravic delavcev in okolja.
A basic principle of some FTAs is the parties’ commitment to respect human rights and the development of a sustainable economy based on protection and promotion of workers’ and environmental rights.
Vendar pa moramo, če želimo, da obe strani poglavja o trajnostnem razvoju upoštevata, razmisliti o oblikovanju mehanizma za vzajemen nadzor in prakso spodbujanja.
However, if these chapters on sustainable development are to be respected by both sides, we must think about setting up mutual surveillance mechanisms and incentives.
Lahko bi na primer razmislili o pogojni liberalizaciji, kot nekakšni obliki skrajševanja časovnega razporeda za dostop na dodatne trge ali odpravo dostopa v primeru spoštovanja ali nespoštovanja posameznih socialnih in/ali okoljskih standardov.
For example, we might envisage thinking about conditional liberalisation, such as shortening the timetable for abolishing restrictions, or access to an additional market, depending on compliance with a particular social and/or environmental standard.
Lahko bi imeli tudi kazalnik zahtev, ki bi se spreminjal glede na države in njihove gospodarske razmere, kar bi omogočilo vpeljavo postopnosti in prožnosti pri zahtevah za spoštovanje socialnih in okoljskih standardov.
It should also be possible to have a moving indicator of requirements, which would vary according to countries and their economic situation, thus making it possible to include a gradual approach and flexibility in the requirement to comply with social and environmental standards.
Na koncu pa je predvsem treba okrepiti arbitražne skupine, forume za izmenjavo mnenj in dialog, kar bi omogočilo večje sodelovanje civilne družbe, in bi imelo resnično dolgoročen učinek vzvoda na notranje politike partnerskih držav.
Finally and above all there should be more arbitration panels and fora for exchanges of views and dialogue, which would allow civil society to be more involved and in the long term would have a genuine lever effect on the internal policies of partner countries.
Ena od možnosti je tudi oblikovanje skupnih dvostranskih "opazovalnic", ki bi bile forum za izmenjavo mnenj med vladami, Evropskim parlamentom, socialnimi partnerji in civilno družbo v širšem smislu.
One possibility is the creation of joint bilateral ‘observatories’ to provide a forum for exchanges of views between the governments, the European Parliament, the social partners and civil society in the wider sense.
Na koncu je treba pozvati Komisijo, naj poleg študij vplivov na trajnostni razvoji pripravi tudi študije vplivov na človekove pravice z razumljivimi trgovinskim kazalniki, ki bodo temeljili na človekovih pravicah ter okoljskih in socialnih standardih.
In conclusion, we must ask the Commission to conduct impact studies on human rights in addition to those on sustainable development, with comprehensible trade indicators based on human rights and environmental and social standards.
Človekove pravice ter socialni in okoljski standardi v enostranskih trgovinskih odnosih: GSP in GSP +
Human rights and social and environmental standards in unilateral trade relations: GSP and GSP+
Ti instrumenti omogočajo, da se poudarijo temeljna načela in pravice Evropske unije.
These instruments make it possible to promote the European Union’s fundamental principles and rights.
Sistem GSP, ki Uniji omogoča enostransko dodeljevanje trgovinskih preferencialov, je postal zelo birokratski in njegova merila za dodeljevanje in odvzemanje preferencialov so premalo pregledna.
The GSP, which enables the EU to grant trade preferences unilaterally, has become very bureaucratic, and its criteria for attributing or withdrawing preferences are not very transparent.
Zato mora Unija pri svoji reviziji uredbe GSP bolje določiti upravičence, ob upoštevanju, na primer, njihove ravni razvoja, in zagotoviti spremljanje obvez teh držav glede vprašanj, povezanih s človekovimi pravicami ter okoljskimi in socialnimi standardi.
When reviewing the GSP Regulation, therefore, the EU should be able to target the recipients more precisely, by taking account, for example, of the level of development and by monitoring those countries’ undertakings on issues linked to human rights and environmental and social standards.
Komisija bi na koncu lahko preučila možnost za vzpostavitev okvira za sodelovanje med Unijo in državami upravičenkami sistema GSP, da se omogoči preiskave in spremljanje sporov, kot tudi več spremljevalnih ukrepov.
The Commission could explore the possibility of setting up a cooperation framework between the EU and GSP countries to facilitate investigations and follow-up of disputes, as well as more accompanying measures.
o človekovih pravicah ter o socialnih in okoljskih standardih v mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumih
on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements
3. poziva, naj vsa trgovinska pogajanja in sporazumi Evropske unije s tretjimi državami vsebujejo klavzulo o človekovih pravicah in predhodno oceno učinka predvidenih sporazumov, ob upoštevanju razmer na področju človekovih pravic vseh pogodbenih strani sporazumov; ta ocena mora vključevati srečanja z zagovorniki človekovih pravic, ki delujejo v zadevnih državah;
Calls for all European Union trade negotiations and agreements with third countries to include a human rights clause and a prior impact assessment of the agreements envisaged, taking account of the human rights situation for all parties to these agreements; considers that this analysis must include meetings with defenders of human rights working in the countries in question;
6. poziva Unijo, naj uveljavi pravico dostopa do naravnih virov pri pogajanjih o trgovinskih sporazumih in pravice avtohtonih in domorodnih prebivalcev glede dostopa do bistvenih naravnih virov; poziva Komisijo, naj v pogajanja in mednarodne trgovinske sporazume vključi težave nakupa in lastništva zemljišč v tretjih državah, zlasti v najmanj razvitih državah in državah v razvoju;
Urges the Union to assert the right of access to natural resources in negotiations of trade agreements and the rights of native and indigenous peoples with regard to access to essential natural resources; calls on the Commission to incorporate the problem of the purchase and ownership of land in third countries, in particular in the least-developed and developing countries, into international trade negotiations and agreements;
8. vendar meni, da enostransko vztrajanje pri praktičnem uveljavljanju univerzalnih človekovih pravic zanika dejstvo, da njihovo izvajanje zahteva tudi finančna sredstva, ki jih pod danimi pogoji ne morejo zagotoviti gospodarstva v vzponu in države v razvoju same;
Takes the view, however, that one-sided insistence on the application in practice of universal human rights ignores the fact that their implementation also requires funding, which, under the existing conditions, cannot be provided by emerging economy and developing countries alone;
11. meni, da mora EU učinkovito spremljati in izvajati klavzule o človekovih pravicah iz svojih trgovinskih sporazumov; poudarja pomen možnosti začasne ali stalne ukinitve trgovinskih preferencialov v primeru kršitev človekovih pravic in zlasti pravic delavcev; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi informacije o izvedljivosti ustanovitve pravno zavezujočega arbitražnega organa in vzpostavitve mednarodnega pregona multinacionalnih podjetij;
Believes that the EU must effectively monitor and enforce the human rights clauses of its trade agreements; highlights the importance of the possibility of temporary or permanent suspension of trade preferences in the event of violations of human, and in particular labour, rights; asks the Commission to provide information on the feasibility of the establishment of a legally binding arbitration body and of the international prosecution of multinationals;
13. ne glede na dobrodošlo uvedbo socialnih in okoljskih klavzul ter klavzul s področja človekovih pravic v mednarodne trgovinske sporazume opozarja na dejstvo, da gre za minimalne zahteve in zgolj enega od instrumentov, ter poudarja, da je treba nujno preprečiti zlorabo v protekcionistične namene, zato je treba sprejeti pristop izvajanja teh klavzul, ki bo spodbujal posvetovanja in demokratično vključevanje vseh strani v postopek odločanja;
Draws attention to the fact that, despite the welcome introduction of social, human rights and environmental clauses in international trade agreements, these are minimum requirements and one instrument among others, and stresses that they must absolutely be prevented from being misused in a protectionist way, and therefore an approach to implementing these clauses should be taken which promotes consultation and democratic inclusion of all parties in the decision-making process;
15. poziva vse države članice, naj izvajajo Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005
Calls upon all Member States to implement the Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
16. meni, da so socialne pravice univerzalne pravice, ki pa se jih ne sme zgolj razglašati, temveč je treba spodbujati tudi njihovo dejansko izvajanje; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj solidarno podprejo prav najrevnejše svetovne države pri izvajanju teh pravic;
Takes the view that social rights are universal rights, which, however, must not only be proclaimed, but the implementation of which in practice must also be promoted; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to show solidarity and support in particular the poorest countries in the world in implementing these rights;
20. zahteva, da se ob sočasni zavzetosti na področju človekovih pravic, razvojne pomoči in mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumov na trajnostni način okrepi regionalni razvojni proces v skladu z razvojnimi cilji tisočletja ZN;
Calls, in parallel with a commitment to human rights, development aid and international trade agreements, for the regional development process to be strengthened in a sustainable way in accordance with the UN Millennium Development Goals;
10. opozarja na velika nesorazmerja med razvitimi gospodarstvi in najrevnejšimi državami v smislu zmogljivosti in potenciala; zato poziva Komisijo, naj pri pristopu k pogajanjem o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu bolje upošteva potrebe držav AKP in zagotovi, da države, ki ne bodo podpisale takšnih sporazumov o partnerstvu, ne bodo oškodovane;
Highlights the vast disparities between developed economies and the poorest nations in terms of capacity and potential; calls therefore for the Commission to better reflect the needs of the ACP countries in its approach to negotiating Economic Partnership Agreements, and ensuring that countries preferring not to sign EPAs are not penalised as a result;
12. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi udeležbo parlamentov partnerskih držav v trgovinskih pogajanjih, da bi se izboljšalo upravljanje in demokratični nadzor v državah v razvoju.
Asks the Commission to ensure that partner countries’ parliaments are involved in trade negotiations, with a view to enhancing governance and democratic scrutiny in developing countries.
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za mednarodno trgovino kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. vztraja, da mora Komisija poleg tega, da učinkovito sodeluje z MOD in drugimi organi iz sporazuma, še naprej izpolnjevati svojo odgovornost, da ocenjuje učinek trgovinskih pogajanj na socialne, okoljske in človekove pravice ter da se na vseh stopnjah celotnega postopka pogajanj in izvajanja trgovinskih sporazumov pregledno posvetuje s sindikati kot priznanimi socialnimi partnerji ter okoljskimi in socialnimi nevladnimi organizacijami iz EU in tretjih držav ter jim zagotovi jasno pravico, da izrazijo zaskrbljenost ali sprožijo ugovore v razmislek in ukrepanje Komisije same;
Insists that, whilst working effectively with the ILO and other treaty bodies, the Commission should continue to meet its responsibility to evaluate the impact of trade negotiations on social, environmental and human rights, paying particular attention to the promotion of decent work for all, and to consult trade unions as recognised social partners, and environmental and social NGOs from the EU and third countries in a transparent manner at all stages throughout the process of negotiating and implementing trade agreements, guaranteeing them a clear right to raise concerns or objections for consideration and action by the Commission itself;
11. zahteva, da se pri vseh prihodnjih trgovinskih sporazumih ohrani prepoved izkoriščanja dela otrok, zlasti pri pridobivanju in obdelavi naravnega kamna, ter uvede enoten evropski sistem certificiranja, ki zagotavlja, da se uvožen naravni kamen in izdelki iz njega dokazano proizvajajo v celotni verigi ustvarjanja vrednosti brez izkoriščanja dela otrok v smislu Konvencije MOD št. 182.
Demands that all future trade agreements provide for a ban on the exploitation of child labour, in particular in the extraction and processing of natural stone, and include a uniform European certification system which ensures that imported natural stone and natural stone products have been demonstrably produced along the entire value chain without the exploitation of child labour within the meaning of ILO Convention 182.
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Martin Callanan, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Philip Claeys, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Frédéric Daerden, Proinsias De Rossa, Sari Essayah, João Ferreira, Pascale Gruny, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Stephen Hughes, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Ádám Kósa, Jean Lambert, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Martin Callanan, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Philip Claeys, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Frédéric Daerden, Proinsias De Rossa, Sari Essayah, João Ferreira, Pascale Gruny, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Stephen Hughes, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Ádám Kósa, Jean Lambert, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Konstantinos Poupakis, Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
4. ugotavlja, da se podnebni ukrepi in politike vse bolj križajo z mednarodno trgovino, in poziva Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo (STO), naj v svoj delovni program vključi še vprašanje o podnebnih spremembah ter določi posebna pravila in standarde v zvezi s tem;
Notes that climate change measures and policies increasingly intersect with international trade, and calls on the World Trade Organization to further include the issue of climate change as part of its work programme and to define specific rules and standards in this regard;
10. vztraja pri tem, da Komisija pozove Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo (STO), naj v primerih sporov ne odloča izključno na podlagi stališč trgovinske politike; meni, da se sprejemljivosti čezmejnih ukrepov za zaščito okolja in zdravja ne sme presojati glede na to, ali bodo posegi po mnenju Svetovne trgovinske organizacije privedli do motenj v prosti trgovini;
Insists that the Commission call on the World Trade Organisation (WTO), in the event of disputes, not to act solely on the basis of trade policy considerations; considers that the admissibility of cross-border environmental and health protection measures should not depend on whether the WTO considers that such intervention would lead to distortions of free trade;
13. meni, da bi se STO in njene države članice morale dogovoriti o vzpostavitvi odprtega svetovnega trga naravnih dobrin, storitev in tehnologij, da se okrepi mednarodna trgovina ter omogoči prosto gibanje zelenih tehnologij in naložb v celotnem svetovnem gospodarstvu;
Takes the view that the World Trade Organization and its member states should agree on the creation of an open global market in environmental goods, services and technologies as a way to strengthen international trade and to allow green technologies and investments to move freely throughout the global economy;
15. poziva Komisijo, naj redno ocenjuje trgovinske sporazume in o teh ocenjevanjih redno obvešča Parlament, pri čemer naj poskrbi za sodelovanje z nacionalnimi in mednarodnimi regulativni organi ter s sindikati in nevladnimi organizacijami, da bi zagotovili spoštovanje okoljskih, zdravstvenih in socialnih standardov;
Calls on the Commission to carry out regular evaluations of trade agreements, and keep the Parliament regularly updated and informed on these evaluations, also ensuring that cooperation with both domestic and international regulatory bodies and with trade unions and NGOs takes place in order to guarantee compliance with environmental, health and social standards;
17. poziva Komisijo, naj med pogajanji o mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumih, v skladu z okvirnim sporazumom o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo, redno in izčrpno poroča Parlamentu o vseh pomembnih tematskih področjih;
Calls on the Commission, in accordance with the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission, to provide Parliament at all times with comprehensive information on all relevant topics during negotiations on international trade agreements;
o poti k novi energetski strategiji za Evropo 2011–2020
on Towards a new Energy Strategy for Europe 2011-2020
Poročevalka: Lena Kolarska-Bobińska
Rapporteur: Lena Kolarska-Bobińska
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................25
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................24
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Komisije, ki povzema obstoječe stanje, „Na poti do nove energetske strategije za Evropo 2011-2020“, objavljenega 7. maja 2010,
– having regard to the Commission stocktaking document entitled 'Towards a new Energy Strategy for Europe 2011-2020', published on 7 May 2010,