natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
24. poziva Komisijo, naj do junija 2011 sestavi seznam različnih tipov in načinov uporabe nanomaterialov na evropskem trgu ter pri tem spoštuje utemeljene poslovne skrivnosti, kot so recepti, ter naj ta seznam objavi; nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj obenem tudi poroča o varnosti teh nanomaterialov;
Calls on the Commission to compile before June 2011 an inventory of the different types and uses of nanomaterials on the European market, while respecting justified commercial secrets such as recipes, and to make this inventory publicly available; furthermore calls on the Commission to report on the safety of these nanomaterials at the same time;
26. poziva k polnemu izvrševanju direktive 2006/114/ES, da bi preprečili zavajajoče oglaševanje nanomaterialov;
Calls for full enforcement of Directive 2006/114/EC to ensure that that there is no misleading advertising with nanomaterials;
31. zahteva, da Komisija in države članice čim prej predlagajo oblikovanje stalne in neodvisne evropske platforme, samostojne pri odločanju, zadolžene za nadzor nad nanotehnologijami in nanomateriali, ter temeljnega in uporabnega raziskovalnega programa o nadzornih metodah (zlasti meroslovje, odkrivanje, strupenost in epidemiologija);
Calls on the Commission and Member States to propose, as soon as possible, the establishment of a permanent and independent European decision-making platform responsible for monitoring nanotechnologies and nanomaterials, and a basic and applied research programme on the methodology for this monitoring (particularly metrology, detection, toxicity and epidemiology);
36. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj posebno pozornost namenijo socialni razsežnosti razvoja nanotehnologij, skupaj s spremljevalnimi raziskavami na področju družboslovja; poudarja dejstvo, da je treba nanotehnologijo ocenjevati z vidika uporabnosti in vpliva na ljudi in okolje; nadalje meni, da je treba čim prej zagotoviti dejavno sodelovanje socialnih partnerjev, ki jih to zadeva.
Calls on the Commission and Member States to pay special attention to the social dimension of the development of nanotechnology, including to the accompanying social science research; underlines the fact that nanotechnology should be judged in terms of its usefulness and its effect on humans and the environment; furthermore considers that the active participation of the social partners concerned has to be ensured from the earliest possible stage.
Nanotehnologija je tehnološka umetnost na novi ravni, ki med. drugim pri energiji, proizvodnji in izdelkih za potrošnike obeta izjemne dosežke.
Nanotechnology is the art of engineering at a new level, where fantastic results can be achieved in energy, manufacturing, consumer products and other sectors.
Omogočen je razvoj biomedicini s senzorji, vgrajenimi v telo, in zdravilom, ki prodrejo skozi krvno-možgansko pregrado.
Biomedicine with sensors implanted in the body and medicine which penetrates blood-brain barriers can be developed.
Z nanogeneratorji je mogoče izkoristiti okolico ali gibanje človeka za pridobivanje energije.
Nano-generators can exploit the environment or body movement to create energy.
Energijsko učinkovita okna, zdržljivejše ribiške palice, kreme za sončenje z visokim faktorjem zaščite pred sončnimi žarki, karoserije, odporne na trke, senzorji za različne strupene snovi, sterilne površine itd., vse to danes že obstaja na trgu ali bi lahko obstajalo v bližnji prihodnosti, seznam pa je mogoče širiti v nedogled.
Energy-efficient windows, more durable fishing rods, sun creams with high sun protection factors, crash-resistant bodywork, sensors for various environmental toxins, sterile surfaces etc., the list of what already exists on the market or may do within the near future is endless.
Vse te vizije pa se lahko sesujejo v prah, če ne bomo poskrbeli, da so proizvodi varni, preden pridejo na trg; ob tem se spomnimo načela „brez podatkov ni trga“ iz uredbe REACH.
But all these dreams may turn to ashes unless we ensure that products are safe before they appear on the market; the old REACH motto, 'no data, no market', springs to mind.
Nanotehnologija prinaša povsem nova toksikološka tveganja, ki jih je težko opredeliti in testirati, slabo pa je tudi poznavanje imunskih reakcij – če lahko imunski sistem sploh reagira v vseh primerih.
Nanotechnology entails new toxicological risks which are vaguely defined and difficult to test, a field in which our knowledge about immune defence response - if it is able to react at all in any given situation - is poor.
Pokazalo se je, da ogljikove nanocevi povzročajo popolnoma iste vrste poškodb kot azbest in da ogljikovi nanoklastri v majhnih koncentracijah povzročajo možganske poškodbe pri ribah, sterilizirano nanosrebro iz nogavic pa uhaja v odpadne vode, pri čemer ni znano, kakšno je tveganje za čistilne naprave.
Carbon nanotubes have proved to give rise to exactly the same type of damage as asbestos, carbon nanoclusters in low concentrations have caused brain damage in fish and sterilising nano silver from socks has leaked into waste water with unknown risks to treatment plants.
Če vemo, da lahko nanodelci prodrejo skozi krvno-možgansko pregrado, kako lahko potem na trgu dovolimo kreme za sončenje, za katere ni zagotovil, da so bile preskušene v zvezi z možnostjo drugačnega delovanja v primerjavi z drugimi kremami, ki so bile v prodaji doslej?
When we know that nanoparticles are capable of penetrating the blood-brain barrier, how can we allow sun creams on to the market when we cannot guarantee that they have been tested to explore the possible differences in behaviour they may exhibit compared with previous creams?
Potrebno je tudi boljše razumevanje dejstva, da lahko pri toksikoloških preiskavah različni preskusi istih nanomaterialov dajo različne rezultate ter da imajo lahko kemično isti nanomateriali, ki prihajajo od različnih proizvajalcev ali so rezultat različnih proizvodnih postopkov, različne lastnosti.
Moreover, the fact that different tests performed on the same nanomaterial can produce different results in toxicological investigations and that chemically identical nanomaterial produced by different manufacturers or manufacturing processes can have different properties also requires a better understanding.
Včasih se znajdejo v teoretskem sivem področju in, kar je še pomembneje, v zakonskem sivem področju.
They sometimes fall into a theoretical grey area but, above all, into a legal grey area.
Politiki moramo zagotoviti, da se nanotehnologija zakonsko ureja na način, ki bo zaščitil okolje in ljudi.
It is our role, as politicians, to ensure that nanotechnology is regulated in a way that protects the environment and mankind.
Nanotehnologija izkorišča dejstvo, da imajo delci nanovelikosti drugačne lastnosti kot večji delci iste snovi.
Nanotechnology exploits the fact that nano-size particles have completely different properties from bigger particles of the same substance.
Tako zelo majhni delci so veliko reaktivnejši kot snov v svoji izvorni obliki in lahko omogočijo povsem nove tehnološke dosežke.
Particles which are so incredibly small are much more reactive than a substance in its original form and may bring about entirely new technological advances.
Te lastnosti pa nanotehnologiji prinašajo tudi težave.
These properties are also the problems faced by nanotechnology.
Tehnologija nam lahko pomaga ali nam škodi.
Technology can help us and harm us.
Da bi se lahko zavestno odločali o tveganjih pri uporabi nove tehnologije, moramo vedeti, kako strupena je neka snov, kakšno je tveganje, da pridemo v stik z njo, in ali je biološko razgradljiva.
In order to make informed choices whereby we can assess the risks of using a new technology, we have to find out how toxic something is, what risk we run of coming into contact with the chemical and whether it is biodegradable.
Zaenkrat smo brez predpisov o označevanju nanomaterialov, niti še ni dogovorjenega opozorilnega znaka!
At the present time, we have no rules for the labelling of nanomaterials; there is not even an established warning symbol!
Poročevalec je poskusil raziskati švedski trg, vendar je kljub opominjanju le v dveh od sedemnajstih primerov dobil konkreten odgovor o tem, kateri proizvodi vsebujejo nanomateriale.
Your rapporteur attempted to investigate the Swedish market but, after sending reminders, received specific answers as to exactly which products contained nano in only two of seventeen cases.
Potrošniki se ne morejo zavestno odločati, če nimajo informacij.
Without knowledge, consumers cannot make informed choices.
Treba je ponovno oceniti mejne vrednosti v zakonih in predpisih ter uvesti predpise o nanoodpadkih.
We need to reassess the limit values laid down by laws and regulations on chemicals and introduce regulations on nano waste.
Komisija v svojem poročilu o nanotehnoligiji meni, da sedanji predpisi zadoščajo, čeprav skoraj ni predpisov, ki bi bili prilagojeni specifičnim učinkom nanotehnologije.
The Commission's paper on nanotechnology considers that the current rules are adequate despite the fact that none of them are geared to the specific effects of nanotechnology.
Komisija se v svoji analizi naslanja na enostranski pravniški izbor predpisov, vendar s tem pristopom zajame nanotehnologijo enako učinkovito, kot če bi hoteli zajeti plankton z ribiško mrežo.
The Commission's analysis is based on a one-dimensional, legalistic overview of the current rules but those rules are about as effective in addressing nanotechnology as trying to catch plankton with a cod fishing net.
Zakonska ureditev bi koristila okolju, zdravju ljudi, vsem potrošnikom in celo industriji.
The environment, public health, all of us as consumers and even industry would benefit from regulation.
Treba je opraviti posebej prilagojene toksikološke preskuse, zakonsko urediti dajanje proizvodov na trg in uvesti označevanje izdelkov za potrošnike.
There is a need for specially adapted toxicological tests; there must be regulation of the manner in which products may be placed on the market and the introduction of labelling of consumer products.
To ne more biti zgolj vprašanje izvajanja, pri čemer bi Komisija s stalnimi ad-hoc pismi zahtevala novo znanje od podjetij.
It is not possible to regard such rules merely as a question of implementation whereby the Commission, with the aid of constant ad hoc letters, seeks new knowledge from companies.
Treba je določiti jasna pravila igre, da bi zaščitili ljudi in okolje ter da bodo podjetja lahko prevzela odgovornost in imela možnost oceniti potencial naložb v nanotehnologije.
There is a need for clear rules to protect human beings and the environment but also so that companies are able to assume their responsibility and assess the potential of investment in nanotechnology.
Pomembno je tudi, da ne ponovimo napak ZDA v zvezi s patentnimi pravicami.
In this respect, it is also important that we do not repeat the mistakes made in the USA in regard to patent rights.
Široki patenti na lastnosti nekaterih delcev bodo zavrli razvoj in ustvarili večji razkol v svetu.
Broad patents on the properties of specific particles will impede developments and create wider global divisions.
Patente je treba odobriti za posamezne dosežke, kot je specifičen proizvodni postopek nekega nanomateriala ali specifična inovativna uporaba.
Patents should be awarded for specific advances such as a particular production process of a nanomaterial or a specific application which constitutes a clear 'inventive step'.
Širok patent na posamezne delce bi vsem drugim akterjem onemogočil razvoj novih/boljših uporab.
Broad patenting of a specific particle would prevent everyone else from developing new or better applications.
Dolgoročneje gledano se lahko informacijska tehnologija, biotehnologija in mikromehanika razvijajo združeno in sovpadejo na nanoravni do te mere, da bo mogoče z uporabo nanotehnologije nadgraditi celo živa bitja, tudi ljudi, to pa prinaša povsem novo etično dilemo.
In the slightly longer term, IT, biotechnology and micromechanics may converge and coincide at the nano level, at which point it may even be possible to upgrade living creatures, including human beings, through the application of nanotechnology - which creates entirely new ethical dilemmas.
Kaj je človek in kaj vse se lahko z nami počne?
What is a human being and what can be done to us?
Bilo bi žalostno, če bi nanotehnologija prišla na trajno slab glas, ker se nam je preveč mudilo, da jo damo na trg, ne da bi poznali tveganja.
It would be tragic if nanotechnology acquired a bad reputation for all time because we were in too much of a hurry to get it on to the market without being aware of the risks involved.
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. poudarja velik pomen, ki ga imata varna in odgovorna kratko-, srednje- in dolgoročna uporaba nanomaterialov, ter razvoj odgovorne nanotehnologije, ki združuje vidike zdravja in varnosti s proizvodnjo in načini uporabe; meni, da je zato treba določiti ustrezne in strokovno utemeljene omejitve;
Emphasises the utmost importance of the safe and responsible use of nanomaterials in the short, medium and long term, as well as of the development of responsible nanotechnology which integrates health and safety considerations with production and application approaches; considers it therefore necessary to formulate adequate thresholds which are scientifically justifiable;
8. poudarja, kako pomembno je, da Komisija in države članice zagotovijo popolno skladnost z okvirno direktivo 89/391/EGS in njenimi posameznimi direktivami ter zlasti z Direktivo 98/24/ES o nevarnih kemičnih dejavnikih pri delu; meni, da so glede nanomaterialov ključni deli teh direktiv ocena tveganja, zaščitni in preventivni ukrepi, pravica do obveščanja in posvetovanja ter pravica do usposabljanja;
Underlines the importance of the Commission and Member States ensuring that the Framework Directive 89/391/EEC and its individual Directives, and in particular Directive 98/24/EC on hazardous chemical agents at work, are fully complied with; considers that the key elements of these Directives, with regard to nanomaterials, are the risk assessment, the protection and prevention measures, the information and consultation rights and the right to be trained;
10. opozarja, da je treba uvesti ukrepe za preventivo in zmanjšanje tveganja, tudi če škodljivost snovi še ni znana; poziva Agencijo za varnost in zdravje pri delu v Bilbau ter države članice, naj okrepijo svoja prizadevanja za večjo ozaveščenost in izmenjavo dobre prakse;
Draws attention to the need for prevention and risk reduction measures to be undertaken even when the dangers of particular substances used are still unknown; invites the Bilbao Agency Risk Observatory and the Member States to step up their efforts in awareness-raising and the exchange of good practice;
16. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj posebno pozornost namenijo socialni razsežnosti razvoja nanotehnologij, skupaj s spremljevalnimi raziskavami na področju družboslovja; poudarja dejstvo, da je treba nanotehnologijo ocenjevati z vidika uporabnosti in vpliva na ljudi in okolje; nadalje meni, da je treba čim prej zagotoviti dejavno sodelovanje socialnih partnerjev, ki jih to zadeva.
Calls on the Commission and Member States to pay special attention to the social dimension of the development of nanotechnology, including to the accompanying social-science research; underlines the fact that nanotechnology should be judged in terms of its usefulness and its effect on humans and the environment; furthermore considers that the active participation of the social partners concerned has to be ensured from the earliest possible stage.
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statističnih podatkih o fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning statistics on plant protection products
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (11120/2/2008 – C6‑0004/2009 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (11120/2/2008 – C6‑0004/2009 ),
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0091 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0778 ),
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0091 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0778 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0256/2009 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0256/2009 ),
UREDBA (ES) št. .../2008 EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA
REGULATION (EC) No …/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
o statističnih podatkih o fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih
concerning statistics on plant protection products
o statističnih podatkih o pesticidih
concerning statistics on pesticides
(1) V Sklepu št. 1600/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 o šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti je bilo priznano, da je treba vpliv pesticidov na zdravje ljudi in okolje, zlasti vpliv fitofarmacevtskih sredstev , ki se uporabljajo v kmetijstvu, še dodatno zmanjšati.
(1) Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme recognised that the impact of pesticides on human health and the environment, in particular from plant protection products used in agriculture, must be reduced further.
Poudaril je potrebo po doseganju bolj trajnostne rabe pesticidov in pozval k večjemu splošnemu zmanjšanju tveganj in uporabi pesticidov v skladu s potrebno zaščito pridelka.
It underlined the need to achieve more sustainable use of pesticides and called for a significant overall reduction of risks and the use of pesticides consistent with the necessary crop protection.
(1) V Sklepu št. 1600/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 o šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti je bilo priznano, da je treba vpliv pesticidov na zdravje ljudi in okolje, zlasti vpliv pesticidov , ki se uporabljajo v kmetijstvu, še dodatno zmanjšati.
(1) Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme recognised that the impact of pesticides on human health and the environment, in particular from pesticides used in agriculture, must be reduced further.
(4) Ker bodo vplivi Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 1998 o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet vidni šele po letu 2006, ko bo končano prvo vrednotenje aktivnih snovi za uporabo v biocidnih pripravkih, Komisija in večina držav članic trenutno nimajo dovolj znanja ali izkušenj, da bi lahko predlagale nadaljnje ukrepe v zvezi z biocidi.
(4) Since the effects of the Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market will not become apparent until well after 2006, when the first evaluation of active substances for use in biocidal products will be finalised, neither the Commission nor most Member States currently have sufficient knowledge or experience to propose further measures regarding biocides.
Področje uporabe te uredbe bi bilo zato treba omejiti na fitofarmacevtska sredstva , vključena v Uredbo (ES) št…./…Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne … o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet, v zvezi s katerimi že obstaja veliko izkušenj o zbiranju podatkov.
The scope of this Regulation should thus be limited to plant protection products covered by Regulation (EC) No…/… of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, for which a large experience already exists on data collection.
Področje uporabe te uredbe bi bilo zato treba omejiti na pesticide , vključene v Uredbo (ES) št…./…Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne … o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet, v zvezi s katerimi že obstaja veliko izkušenj o zbiranju podatkov.
The scope of this Regulation should thus be limited to pesticides which are plant protection products covered by Regulation (EC) No…/… of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, for which a large experience already exists on data collection.
(4a) Vendar se ob upoštevanju rezultatov ocene direktive 98/8/ES ter na podlagi presoje vpliva pričakuje, da se bo področje delovanja te uredbe razširilo na biocidne pripravke.
(4a) However, it is anticipated that , taking into account the results of the evaluation of Directive 98/8/EC and on the basis of an i mpact a ssessment, the scope of this Regulation will be extended to cover biocidal products.
(5) Izkušnje Komisije pri večletnem zbiranju podatkov o prodaji in uporabi fitofarmacevtskih sredstev so pokazale potrebo po usklajeni metodologiji za zbiranje statističnih podatkov na ravni Skupnosti tako pri dajanju v promet kot tudi pri uporabnikih.
(5) The experience of the Commission in collecting data on sales and use of plant protection products over many years has demonstrated the need to have a harmonised methodology for collecting statistics at Community level both from the stage of placing on the market and from users.
Poleg tega bi morali biti za dosego cilja izračuna natančnih kazalnikov tveganja v skladu s cilji tematske strategije o trajnostni rabi pesticidov statistični podatki podrobno opredeljeni vse do aktivnih snovi.
Moreover, in view of the aim of calculating accurate risk indicators according to the objectives of the Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides, statistics need to be detailed up to the level of the active substances.
(5) Izkušnje Komisije pri večletnem zbiranju podatkov o prodaji in uporabi pesticidov so pokazale potrebo po usklajeni metodologiji za zbiranje statističnih podatkov na ravni Skupnosti tako pri dajanju v promet kot tudi pri uporabnikih.
(5) The experience of the Commission in collecting data on sales and use of pesticides over many years has demonstrated the need to have a harmonised methodology for collecting statistics at Community level both from the stage of placing on the market and from users.
(6) Med različnimi možnostmi zbiranja podatkov, ki so bile ocenjene pri presoji vpliva tematske strategije o trajnostni rabi pesticidov, je bilo obvezno zbiranje podatkov priporočeno kot najboljša možnost, ker bi omogočilo hiter in stroškovno učinkovit razvoj natančnih in zanesljivih podatkov o dajanju v promet in uporabi fitofarmacevtskih sredstev .
(6) Among the different data collection options evaluated in the impact assessment of the Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides, mandatory data collection was recommended as the best option because it would allow the development of accurate and reliable data on the placing on the market and use of plant protection products quickly and cost-efficiently.
(6) Med različnimi možnostmi zbiranja podatkov, ki so bile ocenjene pri presoji vpliva tematske strategije o trajnostni rabi pesticidov, je bilo obvezno zbiranje podatkov priporočeno kot najboljša možnost, ker bi omogočilo hiter in stroškovno učinkovit razvoj natančnih in zanesljivih podatkov o dajanju v promet in uporabi pesticidov .
(6) Among the different data collection options evaluated in the impact assessment of the Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides, mandatory data collection was recommended as the best option because it would allow the development of accurate and reliable data on the placing on the market and use of pesticides quickly and cost-efficiently.
(7) Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 322/97 z dne 17. februarja 1997 o statističnih podatkih Skupnosti je referenčni okvir za določbe te uredbe.
(7) Council Regulation (EC) No 322/97 of 17 February 1997 on Community Statistics constitutes the reference framework for the provisions of this Regulation.