natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I. ker neoporečnost v kontekstu te resolucije o spletnih igrah na srečo ne pomeni le zavezanosti preprečevanju goljufij in kaznivih dejanj, temveč tudi odvisnosti od iger na srečo in dostopa mladoletnikov do njih, in sicer s spoštovanjem varstva potrošnikov in kazenske zakonodaje, ter zavezanost preprečevanju nedovoljenega vpliva na izid športnih tekmovanj zaradi športnih stav,
I. whereas integrity in the context of this resolution on online gambling means a commitment to preventing not only fraud and crime but also problem gambling and under-age gambling by compliance with consumer protection and criminal laws and by protecting sporting competitions from any undue influence associated with sports betting,
J. ker spletne igre na srečo združujejo nekaj dejavnikov tveganja, ki so povezani s problematičnim igranjem na srečo, med drugim lahek dostop do iger, raznovrstnost iger, ki so na voljo, ter manjše družbene omejitve,
J. whereas online gambling combines several risk factors related to problem gambling, such as, among others, easy access to gambling, the availability of a variety of games and fewer social constraints
K. ker so se športne stave in druge spletne igre razvijale hitro in nenadzorovano (zlasti prek meja v internetu), je šport zaradi nenehne grožnje, da bodo rezultati vnaprej dogovorjeni, in zaradi „stav proti rezultatu“ za posamezne športne dogodke še posebej izpostavljen nezakonitemu ravnanju stavnic,
K. whereas sports betting activities and other online games have developed rapidly and in an uncontrolled manner (particularly cross-border over the internet), and the ever present threat of match-fixing and the phenomenon of “lay bets” on specific events in sports matches makes sports particularly vulnerable to illegal betting behaviour,
Pregleden sektor, ki varuje javne in potrošniške interese
A t ransparent sector that safeguards the public and consumer interest s
2. poudarja, da so storitve iger na srečo gospodarska dejavnost posebnega značaja, ker so z njimi povezana vprašanja socialnega in javnega reda ter zdravstvenega varstva in ker konkurenca na tem področju ne vodi do boljše delitve virov, zaradi česar je pri igrah na srečo potreben pristop več stebrov; poudarja, da pristop samo z vidika notranjega trga na tem občutljivem področju ni ustrezen, in poziva Komisijo, naj posebno pozornost posveti stališčem Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti glede tega vprašanja;
Stresses that gambling services are to be considered as an economic activity of a very special nature due to the social and public order and health care aspects linked to it, where competition will not lead to a better allocation of resources, which is the reason why gambling requires a multi-pillar approach; emphasises that a pure Internal Market approach is not appropriate in this highly sensitive area, and requests the Commission to pay particular attention to the views of the European Court of Justice regarding this matter;
5. poudarja, da bi morali zakonodajalci in ponudniki tesno sodelovati z drugimi udeleženci na področju spletnih iger na srečo, na primer ponudniki iger na srečo, zakonodajalci, potrošniškimi organizacijami, športnimi organizacijami, panožnimi združenji in mediji, ter imeti skupno odgovornost za neoporečnost spletnih iger na srečo in obveščanje potrošnikov o možnostih negativnih posledic teh iger;
Stresses that regulators and operators should closely cooperate with other stakeholders operating in the field of online gambling, e.g. gambling operators, regulators, consumer organisations, sports organisations, industry associations and the media, which share a joint responsibility for the integrity of online gambling and for informing consumers of the possible negative consequences of online gambling;
8. meni, da varovanje neoporečnosti športnih dogodkov in tekmovanj zahteva sodelovanje lastnikov športnih pravic, izvajalcev spletnih stav ter javnih organov na nacionalni ravni, ravni EU in mednarodni ravni;
Considers that the protection of the integrity of sports events and competitions requires cooperation between sports rights owners, online betting operators and public authorities at national as well as EU and international level;
Preprečevanje škode za potrošnika
Prevention of consumer detriment
21. meni, da samoregulacija oglaševanja, promocije in zagotavljanja spletnih iger na srečo ni dovolj učinkovita, zato poudarja, da je potrebna tako ureditev kot sodelovanje med panogo in javnimi organi;
Considers that self-regulation regarding the advertising, promotion and provision of online games is not sufficiently effective and therefore emphasises the need for both regulation and cooperation between the industry and the authorities;
Kodeks ravnanja
Code of C onduct
Spremljanje in raziskave
Monitoring and research
30. poziva Komisijo, Europol in nacionalne organe, naj zbirajo in si izmenjujejo informacije o obsegu goljufij in drugih kaznivih dejanj v sektorju spletnih iger na srečo, na primer med udeleženci v sektorju;
Calls on the Commission, Europol and the national authorities to collect and share information about the extent of fraud and other criminal behaviour in the online gambling sector, e.g. amongst actors involved in the sector;
Pri dejavnosti igralništva gre za denarna vplačila pri igrah na srečo, vključno z loterijami in transakcijami v zvezi s stavami.
Gambling activities involve wagering a stake with monetary value in games of chance, including lotteries and betting transactions.
Spletne igre na srečo obstajajo od leta 1996, ko je bila na voljo prva taka igra na Finskem.
Online gambling has existed since 1996, where the first game was made available in Finland.
Od takrat se je trg spletnih iger na srečo močno razmahnil.
Since then the market for online gambling has grown considerably.
Ocenjeno je bilo, da je komercialni spletni trg iger na srečo v EU 25 v letu 2003 ustvaril 51,5 milijarde EUR bruto dohodka (dobitki izvajalcev brez izplačila nagrad).
In 2003, it was estimated that the commercial online gambling market in EU 25 generated Gross Gaming Revenues (operator winnings less payments of prizes) of € 51.5 billion in 2003.
Spletne igre na srečo prek interneta, mobilnih telefonov ali interaktivne televizije predstavljajo okoli 5 % celotnega trga iger na srečo v EU, kar je v letu 2004 pomenilo od 2 do 3 milijarde EUR bruto dohodka.
At present, online gambling via Internet, mobile phones or interactive TV accounts for roughly 5 % of the total gambling market in the EU, worth € 2 to 3 billion in annual Gross Gaming Revenues in 2004.
Evropski trg spletnih storitev naj bi se letno povečal za najmanj 8,4 % (v Avstriji in na Madžarskem) do največ 17,6 % (v Italiji)
The European online gambling market is expected to grow at a minimum rate of 8.4 per cent per annum (in Austria and Hungary) to a maximum of 17.6 per cent (in Italy).
PricewaterhouseCoopers: Global Entertainment and Media Outlook : 2008–2012, str.
PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Global Entertainment and Media Outlook: 2008-2012 , p.
Rast se meri kot kumulativno povečanje letnega dohodka od iger na srečo. .
Growth is measured as the compound increase in annual gambling revenue.
Države članice so zato prisiljene prilagoditi in pripraviti zakonodajo, ki bo sledila željam potrošnikov in ponudnikom storitev.
Member States are therefore forced to adapt and develop regulation in order to keep pace with consumer preferences and suppliers’ services.
Posebna narava spletnih iger na srečo povzroča določene težave oblikovalcem politike v državah članicah.
The specific nature of online gambling causes certain difficulties for policy-makers in the Member States.
Prvič, spletne igre na srečo ponudnikom omogočajo, da zagotavljajo storitve potrošnikom v državi članici, ki ni država njihovega sedeža.
First of all, online gambling entails a cross-border element, which makes it possible for online gambling operators to provide their services to consumers in other Member States than the one they are based in.
Potrošniki zato ne vedo, v kateri državi ima njihov dobavitelj storitve sedež.
Consumers may therefore not know in which country their service provider is based.
Drugič, spletne igre na srečo povečujejo nevarnost, da ponudniki ne morejo preveriti istovetnost potrošnika, ker nekdo, ki uporablja kreditno kartico, ni nujno njen lastnik.
Secondly, online gambling creates an increased risk of online gambling providers not being able to verify the identity of the consumer since the person using a credit card may not be its rightful owner.
Tretjič, spletna mesta z igrami na srečo se lahko hitro vzpostavijo in nepošteni izvajalci se lahko v kratkem času pojavijo in tudi izginejo.
Thirdly, online gambling sites can be set up quickly and dishonest operators can therefore appear and disappear within a short period of time.
Četrtič, ponudniki spletnih iger na srečo v primerjavi s tradicionalnimi igrami na srečo težko nadzorujejo potrošnike, da bi ugotovili, ali so mladoletni, pod vplivom alkohola ali drugače omamljeni in ali se sumljivo obnašajo.
Fourthly, it is difficult for online gambling operators to supervise their customers as opposed to conventional gambling where it is possible to see whether the customer is under age, is drunk or in other ways intoxicated or behaving suspiciously.
Ker je dostop do spletnih iger na srečo lahek in mogoč v zasebnosti, ni socialnega nadzora in omejitev, ki bi jih pomenila navzočnost drugih oseb.
Also since access to online gambling services is easy and can be done in isolation, social checks and constraints that can be exercised by the presence of others are lacking.
V dvajsetih državah članicah so spletne igre na srečo dovoljene, medtem ko so v sedmih prepovedane.
In twenty EU Member States online gambling is allowed, whereas seven Member States have prohibited online gambling.
Trinajst držav članic ima liberaliziran trg, šest jih ima državni monopol, ena pa je dovolila zasebni monopol
Thirteen Member States have a liberalised market, while six have state-owned monopolies and one Member State has licensed a private monopoly.
Spletne igre na srečo, informativni dokument za Evropski parlament, Europe Economics, XX, oktober 2008. .
Online Gambling, a briefing paper for the European Parliament, Europe Economics, XX October 2008
Države članice, ki so prepovedale vse spletne igre na srečo ali jih dovoljujejo le pod monopolnimi pogoji, trdijo, da so te omejitve upravičene zaradi socialnega in javnega reda.
The Member States who have banned online gambling altogether or allow it only under monopoly conditions argue that these limitations are justified on grounds of social and public order.
Vseeno je bilo veliko sporov zaradi tako imenovanih nacionalnih monopolov iger na srečo.
However, there have been great disputes regarding the so-called national gambling monopolies.
Na Evropsko komisijo so prišle številne pritožbe podjetij, ki se ukvarjajo z igrami na srečo, zasebnikov in medijskih organizacij, z zahtevo, da določene države članice nezakonito varujejo svoj trg iger na srečo in dohodek, ki izhaja iz njihovih monopolov.
Numerous complaint have been filed with the European Commission by gambling companies, private persons and media organisations claiming that certain Member States are unlawfully protecting their gambling markets and the revenues arising from their monopolies.
Komisija je zato proti desetim državam članicam začela postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev, da bi preverila, ali so nacionalni ukrepi, ki omejujejo čezmejno ponudbo spletnih iger na srečo, skladni z zakonodajo Skupnosti
As a result the Commission has started infringement procedures against ten Member States, in order to verify whether national measures limiting the cross-border supply of online gambling are compatible with Community law.
Vprašanje ureditve trgov iger na srečo EU (tradicionalnih ali spletnih) je zelo občutljivo.
The issue of regulating EU gambling markets, whether conventional or online, is very sensitive.
Očitno je treba pojasniti ureditveno okolje spletnih iger na srečo.
But there is a clear need for clarification about the regulatory environment concerning online gambling.
Trenutno je v postopku pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti več zadev, povezanih z igrami na srečo.
At present, several cases pending at the European Court of Justice right now are related to gambling.
Položaj je neugoden za Sodišče in za države članice, potrošnike in ponudnike spletnih iger na srečo.
This situation is dissatisfactory for the Court as well as Member States, consumers and online gambling providers.
Številne zadeve glede iger na srečo so bile posredovane Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti, nekatere so že rešene (sodna praksa v nadaljevanju), nekatere pa so še v postopku.
A number of cases regarding gambling have been referred to the European Court of Justice, some of which have already been settled (case law below) and many of which are still pending.
Sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti sestavljajo naslednje zadeve: Schindler 1994 (C-275/92), Läärä 1999 (C-124/97), Zenatti 1999 (C-67/98), Anomar 2003 (C-6/01), Gambelli 2003 (C-243/01), Lindman 2003 (C-42/02), Placanica 2007 (C-338/04), Unibet 2007 (C– 432/05) in UNIRE 2007 (C– 260/04).
The case law by the European Court of Justice consists of the following cases: Schindler 1994 (C-275/92), Läärä 1999 (C-124/97), Zenatti 1999 (C-67/98), Anomar 2003 (C-6/01), Gambelli 2003 (C-243/01), Lindman 2003 (C-42/02), Placanica 2007 (C-338/04), Unibet 2007 (C – 432/05) and UNIRE 2007 (C – 260/04).
V teh zadevah je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti izjavilo, da velja za storitve iger na srečo načelo prostega gibanja (člen 49 Pogodbe o EU).
In these cases The European Court of Justice has stated that freedom of movement (Article 49 of the EU Treaty) applies to gambling services.
Sodišče je tudi izjavilo, da lahko igre na srečo zbudijo določene moralne, verske in kulturne zadržke, prinašajo veliko nevarnost kaznivih dejanj in imajo škodljive posledice za posameznika in družbo
However the court has also stated that gambling may entail certain moral, religious and cultural aspects, involve a high risk of crime or fraud and may have damaging individual and social consequences.
V sodbi v zadevi Schindler, C-275/92 .
EJC in the Schindler judgment, C-275/92
Omejitve so zato upravičene, če so potrebne za varovanje potrošnika, ohranjanje javnega reda (preprečevanje goljufij in kaznivih dejanj), ohranjanje socialnega reda (kulturnega in moralnega) ter za preprečevanje iger na srečo, ki bi bile vir zasebnega dobička
Restrictions may therefore be justified if they are necessary for consumer protection, for maintenance of the public order (prevention of fraud and crime), for maintaining of the social order (culture or morale) and for preventing gambling from being a source of private profit.
Sodba v zadevi Gambelli, C-243/01. .
Gambelli judgement C-243/01
Opozoriti je treba, da je komisar McCreevy 14. novembra 2006 odgovoril na ustno vprašanje o igrah na srečo, ki ga je podala predsednica Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov Arlene McCarthy med plenarnim zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta v Strasbourgu.
It should also be noted that on 14 November 2006, Commissioner McCreevy responded to the Oral Question on Gambling posed by Arlene McCarthy, Chair of the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection, during the European Parliament’s plenary session in Strasbourg.
Izjavil je, da trenutno kaže, da usklajevanja zakonodaje o igrah na srečo na ravni EU verjetno ne bo.
Here, the commissioner stated that EU-wide harmonisation of legislation regulating gambling at present was not likely.
Poročilo se osredotoča na neoporečnost spletnih iger na srečo.
The object of this report is to focus on the integrity of online gambling.
Neoporečnost je vrsta vrednot, katerih namen je preprečevati goljufije: tako goljufije ponudnikov spletnih iger na srečo na škodo potrošnikov in obratno kot goljufije med potrošniki.
Integrity is first seen as a set of values which aim at preventing fraud: by online gambling operators against consumers or by consumers against online gambling operators or consumers against other consumers.
Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija problem iger na srečo opredeljuje kot vsako pretirano igranje na srečo, ki vodi k finančnim, socialnim in/ali psihološkim motnjam
WHO defines problem gambling as any excessive gambling that leads to financial, social and/or psychological disorders.
WHO (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural disorders, Ženeva.
WHO (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural disorders , Geneva.
Drugi skupno uporabljeni pojmi vključujejo patološko, prisilno, moteno, pretirano in zasvojeno igranje na srečo. .
Other commonly used terms include pathological, compulsive, disordered, excessive and addictive gambling.
Nevarnost zasvojenosti z igranjem na srečo se na splošno povečuje zaradi stalne priložnosti za igro, pogostih dobitkov, vabljive in privlačne narave iger, možnosti zadetka velikih vsot, možnosti kredita za igranje, namestitve iger na krajih, kjer lahko ljudje igrajo spontano, in dejstva, da ni informacijske kampanje o nevarnosti igranja na srečo
The risk of an addiction to gambling is generally aggravated by the permanent availability of the opportunity to play, the frequency of wins, the enticing or attractive nature of games, the possibility of staking large sums, the availability of credit in order to play, the location of games at places where people can play on an impulse, and the fact that there is no information campaign regarding the risks of gaming.
Mnenje generalnega pravobranilca Bota z dne 14. oktobra 2008 v zadevi C-42/07; glej tudi SICL, str.
Opinion of Advocate General Bot to the ECJ, 14 October 2008, Case C-42/07; see also SICL (2006), p.
Spletne igre na srečo združujejo nekaj dejavnikov tveganja, ki so povezani s problematičnim igranjem na srečo.
Online gambling combines several of such risk factors related to problem gambling.
Spletni izvajalci lahko na primer nudijo širok izbor iger (stave, ruleta, poker, igralni avtomati na kovance) in redno uvajajo nove igre, uporabljajo nove metode trženja in ciljanja, ki vključujejo podatke iz zadnjih raziskav vedenja (potrošnje) strank, tako da potrošnika obdržijo pred zaslonom.
For instance, online operators are able to offer a wide variety of games (betting, roulette, poker, slot machines, etc) and to introduce new games regularly, using new marketing and targeting techniques, involving the latest data research technology on the customers’ (spending) behaviour, keeping the consumer ‘glued’ to the screen.
Skrb zbujajoč vidik je vse večji medsebojni vpliv večpredstavnih storitev, kot so televizija, telefonija in sporočila SMS ter internetne strani, ki nudijo igre na daljavo ali spletne igre ter omogočajo lahko in socialno sprejemljivo sodelovanje v teh igrah, zlasti za mlade.
A worrying aspect is the increasing cross-over between multimedia services, such as television, phone- and SMS-services and internet sites, in offering remote or online games, making it easy and socially acceptable to participate in those games, especially for younger people.
v skladu s členom 48(3) poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 48(3) of the Rules of Procedure
Zaskrbljeni smo, ker je vsebina poročila prekoračila pristojnosti pobude, ki se je nameravala osredotočiti na preglednost trga spletnih iger na srečo, neoporečnost ponudnikov spletnih iger na srečo ter morebitno škodo za potrošnike, ki jo povzroča panoga spletnih iger na srečo.
We are concerned that the content of the report goes beyond the remit of the initiative which intended to focus on the transparency of the online gaming market, the integrity of online gambling operators and the possible consumer detriment caused by the online gaming industry.
Menimo, da poročilo spodbija nekatera načela enotnega trga, da utegnejo biti ključni vidiki trga spletnih iger na srečo narobe razumljeni in da poročilo ne odseva v zadostni meri razmer v vseh državah članicah.
We consider that the report undermines some of the principles of the Single Market, that key aspects of the online gambling market may be misunderstood and that the report does not adequately reflect the situation in all Member States.
V nekaterih državah članicah že obstaja dobro delujoč in ustrezno urejen trg, ki potrošnikom omogoča igro v varnem in zaščitenem spletnem okolju.
Well functioning and well regulated markets already exist in certain Member States that allow consumers to play in a safe and secure online environment.
Strinjamo se, da je razmah interneta dolgoročen izziv za varstvo potrošnikov, vendar je mogoče to učinkovito urediti brez prepovedi; prav tako se zavedamo že opravljenega dela pristojnih evropskih operaterjev, ki želijo izboljšati standarde in zagotoviti varnost potrošnikov.
We accept that the advent of the Internet poses consumer protection challenges in the long term but these can be effectively regulated, without prohibition; notes the work already done by responsible European operators to improve standards and ensure consumer safety.
Opozorili bi radi na že dosežen napredek pri razvoju regulativne ureditve v nekaterih sodnih pristojnostih in na morebitne koristi odprtih, a učinkovito urejenih trgov; prav tako smo seznanjeni s praktičnimi in pravnimi omejitvami predlaganih metod za preprečevanje opravljanja spletnih storitev.
We would like to emphasise the advances already made by some jurisdictions in developing regulatory regimes and the potential benefits of more open yet effectively regulated markets; notes also the practical and legal limitations of proposed methods to block online service provision.
Mogens Camre, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Gabriela Creţu, Janelly Fourtou, Evelyne Gebhardt, Martí Grau i Segú, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Anna Hedh, Edit Herczog, Pierre Jonckheer, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Catiuscia Marini, Arlene McCarthy, Nikolaj Mladenov, Catherine Neris, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Karin Riis-Jørgensen, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Salvador Domingo Sanz Palacio, Christel Schaldemose, Eva-Britt Svensson, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Mogens Camre, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Gabriela Creţu, Janelly Fourtou, Evelyne Gebhardt, Martí Grau i Segú, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Anna Hedh, Edit Herczog, Pierre Jonckheer, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Catiuscia Marini, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, Catherine Neris, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Karin Riis-Jørgensen, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Salvador Domingo Sanz Palacio, Christel Schaldemose, Eva-Britt Svensson, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
o družbeni odgovornosti podizvajalskih podjetij v proizvodni verigi
on the social responsibility of subcontracting undertakings in production chains
– ob upoštevanju člena 31(1) listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 31(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju členov 39, 49, 50 in 137 Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Articles 39, 49, 50 and 137 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sankcijah zoper delodajalce državljanov tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo v EU ( KOM(2007)0249 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council providing for sanctions against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals ( COM(2007)0249 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 26. oktobra 2006 o uporabi direktive 96/71/ES o napotitvi delavcev
– having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2006 on the application of Directive 96/71/EC on the posting of workers
452. in z dne 11. julija 2007 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev
452. and its resolution of 11 July 2007 on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services
– ob upoštevanju smernic Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj za večnacionalna podjetja,
– having regard to the OECD's Guidelines for multinational enterprises,
– ob upoštevanju tristranske deklaracije ILO o načelih večnacionalnih podjetij in socialne politike,
– having regard to the ILO's tripartite declaration of principles concerning multinational enterprises and social policy,