natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– predlagana prerazporeditev v obdobju štirih let vpliva na instrumente, ki bi v nasprotnem primeru lahko pridobili močnejši položaj v okviru EU kot svetovne udeleženke; na primer, lahko bi bilo sporno zmanjšati sredstva za instrument civilne zaščite v tretjih državah, saj naravne nesreče redno prizadevajo najrevnejše države tretjega sveta;
- the proposed redeployment over the four years affects instruments whose positioning in the frame of EU as a global player could have on the contrary been reinforced; as an example, it could be questionable to reduce appropriations for the Civil Protection Instrument in third countries when natural catastrophes hit regularly the poorest third world countries;
– glede uporabe sredstev instrumenta prilagodljivosti je predviden prispevek v višini le 9,6 % (18,3 milijona od 190 milijonov EUR) za celotno financiranje spremljevalnih ukrepov glede banan (samo v letu 2010), medtem ko bi se v letu 2010 lahko uporabilo do 115 milijonov EUR sredstev tega instrumenta;
- furthermore, as regards the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, a contribution of only 9.6% (18.3 million out of 190 million) to the whole financing of BAM, is foreseen (in 2010 only), whereas this Instrument could be mobilised up to 115 million in year 2010;
– zaradi tega prevelika uporaba rezerve ogroža zmogljivost Unije za reševanje nepredvidljivih novih kriz in njen odziv nanje ter ne podpira predlaganega financiranja;
- as a result, the extensive use of the margin jeopardises the Union's ability to face and to react to unforeseeable emerging crisis, and do not speak in favour of the proposed financing;
– zato kronično prenizko financiranje razdelka 4, kakor je poudarila Komisija v svojem poročilu o oceni delovanje medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, preprečuje trajnost financiranja spremljevalnih ukrepov glede banan.
- therefore, the chronic under financing of Heading 4, rightly pointed out by the Commission in its report assessing the functioning of the IIA, does not allow the sustainability of the financing of BAM.
V sedanji obliki predlog ni združljiv z večletnim finančnim okvirjem 2007–2013, njegova revizija na vse načine, ki jih omogočajo točke 21 do 23 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, pa je neizbežna.
As it stands, the proposal is not compatible with the MFF 2007-2013, and its revision, through all means provided for by points 21 to 23 of the IIA, is unavoidable.
Predlagano celotno financiranje (vključno z razporeditvijo) v obdobju štirih let je naslednje (v milijonih EUR):
For information, the proposed overall financing (including redeployment) over the four years
VIRI FINANCIRANJA
FINANCING SOURCES
Uporaba instrumenta prilagodljivosti
Mobilisation of the Flexibility instrument
Razlika do zgornje meje v razdelku 4
Margin Heading 4
Sporazumi o osnovnih proizvodih
Commodities Agreements
Nujni ukrepi za ublažitev učinkov finančne in gospodarske krize v državah v razvoju
Emergency response to the financial and economic crisis in developing countries
Pripravljalni ukrep za prenos farmacevtske tehnologije v korist držav v razvoju
Preparatory action - Pharmaceutical-related transfer of technology in favour of developing countries
Pripravljalni ukrep – Okoljsko spremljanje območja Črnega morja in skupni evropski okvirni program za razvoj regije Črnega morja
Preparatory action - Environmental monitoring of the Black Sea Basin and a common European framework programme for development of the Black Sea region
Varnost hrane
Food security
Nedržavni udeleženci v razvoju
Non-State actors in development
Človekov in družbeni razvoj
Human and social development
Finančni instrument za civilno zaščito
Civil protection CPFI
1a. meni, da predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z izrazitim zmanjšanjem razlike do zgornje meje v razdelku 4 večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013 ne omogoča zadostnega manevrskega prostora za ustrezno reševanje morebitnih prihajajočih kriz in za odziv nanje;
C onsiders that the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, by drastically reducing the margin under the ceiling of heading 4 of multiannual financial framework 2007-2013(MFF), does not leave sufficient room for manoeuvre to face and to react adequately to a potential upcoming crisis;
1b. glede na dolgotrajno vprašanje o trgovini z bananami meni, da bi lahko bili predlagani ukrepi prej vključeni v večletni finančni okvir;
C onsiders that, due to the long ‑ standing issue concerning trade in bananas, the proposed measures could have been integrated at an earlier stage into the MFF;
1c. ponavlja svoje prepričanje, da novi instrumenti ne smejo biti financirani s prerazporeditvijo, saj to ogroža sedanje prednostne naloge;
R eiterates its conviction that any new instrument should not be financed through redeployment as this would jeopardise the existing priorities;
1d. opozarja, da je instrument prilagodljivosti namenjen financiranju „jasno opredeljenih odhodkov, ki jih ni mogoče financirati v okviru zgornjih mej 1 “, in meni, da so ukrepi v zvezi s trgovino z bananami spremljevalni ukrepi, ki spadajo v to kategorijo;
R ecalls that the Flexibility Instrument aims at financing “ clearly identified expenditure which could not be financed within the limits of the ceilings 1 ” , and considers measures relating to trade in bananas to be accompanying measures falling into that category;
1 Točka 27 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17 maja 2006.
1 Point 27 of the IIA of 17 May 2006.
Odstavek 1 e (novo)
Paragraph 1 e (new)
o javni radioteleviziji v digitalni dobi: prihodnost dvojnega sistema
on public service broadcasting in the digital era: the future of the dual system
– ob upoštevanju člena 14 in člena 106(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Articles 14 and 106(2) of the Treaty on European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Protokola št. 29, priloženega PEU, o sistemu javne radiotelevizije v državah članicah
– having regard to Protocol No 29, annexed to the TEU, on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States
UL C 83, 30.3.2010, str.
OJ C 83, 30.3.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 11(2) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah
– having regard to Article 11(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/13/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. marca 2010 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev (Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah)
– having regard to Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive)
UL L 95, 15.4.2010, str.
OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. septembra 1996 o vlogi javne televizije v multimedijski družbi
– having regard to its resolution of 19 September 1996 on the role of public service television in a multi-media society
UL C 320, 28.10.1996, str.
OJ C 320, 28.10.1996, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. septembra 2008 o koncentraciji in pluralizmu medijev v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 25 September 2008 on concentration and pluralism in the media in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. decembra 2008 o medijski pismenosti v digitalnem okolju
– having regard to its resolution of 16 December 2008 on media literacy in a digital world
UL C 45E, 23.2.2010, str.
OJ C 45E, 23.2.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za storitve javne radiotelevizije z dne 2. julija 2009
– having regard to the Commission communication of 2 July 2009 on the application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting
UL C 257, 27.10.2009, str.
OJ C 257, 27.10.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o medijskem pluralizmu v državah članicah Evropske unije ( SEC(2007)0032 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document on media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union ( SEC(2007)0032 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali na zasedanju Sveta 25. januarja 1999, o javni radioteleviziji
– having regard to the resolution of the Council and of the representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 25 January 1999 concerning public service broadcasting
UL C 30, 5.2.1999, str.
OJ C 30, 5.2.1999, p.
– ob upoštevanju Priporočila št. 1878 (2009) parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope z dne 25. junija 2009 o financiranju javne radiotelevizije,
– having regard to Recommendation No 1878 (2009) of 25 June 2009 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the funding of public service broadcasting,
– ob upoštevanju izjave Odbora ministrov Sveta Evrope z dne 27. septembra 2006 o zajamčeni neodvisnosti javne radiotelevizije v državah članicah,
– having regard to the declaration of 27 September 2006 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the guarantee of the independence of public service broadcasting in the member states,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A7-0286/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A7‑0286/2010 ),
A. ker so demokratična evropska družba, soudeležba državljanov v javni razpravi in dostop do informacij v digitalnem svetu odvisni od živahnega in konkurenčnega sektorja avdiovizualnih in tiskanih medijev,
A. whereas, in a democratic European society, participation of citizens in public debate and access to information in the digital world depend on a vibrant and competitive audiovisual and written press sector,
B. ker je radiotelevizija med najpomembnejšimi viri informacij, ki so na voljo državljanom v državah članicah EU, in je kot taka pomemben dejavnik pri oblikovanju vrednot in mnenj ljudi,
B. whereas broadcast media are among the most important sources of information available to citizens in EU Member States, and as such are an important factor in shaping people’s values and opinions,
C. ker imajo javne in zasebne radiotelevizije pomembno vlogo pri evropski avdiovizualni produkciji, kulturni raznolikosti in identiteti, informacijah, pluralizmu, socialni koheziji, pospeševanju temeljnih svoboščin in delovanju demokracije,
C. whereas both public service and private-sector broadcasting have a crucial role to play with regard to European audiovisual production, cultural diversity and identity, information, pluralism, social cohesion, the promotion of fundamental freedoms and the functioning of democracy,
D. ker imajo javne radiotelevizijske ustanove vodilno vlogo pri spodbujanju in izkoriščanju tehnološkega napredka za posredovanje svojih vsebin javnosti z novimi mediji in distribucijskimi tehnikami,
D. whereas public service broadcasters have a pioneering role in stimulating and utilising technological developments in order to offer their content to the public via innovative media and distribution techniques,
E. ker je avdiovizualna krajina EU edinstvena in jo označuje tako imenovani dvojni sistem, ki temelji na pravem ravnotežju med javnimi in komercialnimi radiotelevizijskimi ustanovami,
E. whereas the EU audiovisual landscape is unique, and is characterised by what has been described as the ‘dual system’, based on a true balance between public service and commercial broadcasters,
F. ker je učinkovit dvojni sistem s pravim ravnotežjem med javnimi in zasebnimi radiotelevizijami ustanovami v skupnem interesu,
F whereas an effective dual system with a genuine balance between public service and private-sector broadcasters, is in the general interest,
G. ker soobstoj javnih in komercialnih radiotelevizijskih ustanov zagotavlja raznolik nabor brezplačno dostopnih programov, ki koristi vsem državljanom EU in prispeva k medijskemu pluralizmu, kulturni in jezikovni raznolikosti, uredniški konkurenci (v smislu kakovosti in raznolikosti vsebin) pa tudi k svobodi izražanja,
G. whereas the coexistence of public service and commercial broadcasters has ensured a diverse range of freely accessible programming, which benefits all EU citizens and contributes to media pluralism, cultural and linguistic diversity, editorial competition (in terms of content quality and diversity) and freedom of expression,
H. ker ima dvojni sistem za EU posebej pomembno vlogo, saj prispeva k pripravi in širjenju vsebin EU,
H. whereas the EU attaches special importance to the role of the dual system in contributing to the production and dissemination of EU content,
I. ker so spremembe avdiovizualne krajine v zadnjih letih z razvojem digitalnih tehnologij, lastniškimi plačljivimi platformami in novimi spletnimi medijskimi ponudniki vplivale na tradicionalni dvojni sistem radiotelevizije in na uredniško konkurenco (v smislu kakovosti in raznolikosti vsebin), zaradi česar morajo zato javne in zasebne radiotelevizijske ustanove diverzificirati svoje dejavnosti in razmisliti o novih distribucijskih platformah,
I. whereas changes in the audiovisual landscape in recent years, with the development of digital technologies, proprietary pay platforms and new online media actors, have had an impact on the traditional dual broadcasting system and on editorial competition (in terms of content quality and diversity), making it necessary for public service and private broadcasters to diversify their operations and consider new distribution platforms,
J. ker širjenje novih tehnologij spreminja način, kako evropski državljani dostopajo do medijev in informacij,
J. whereas the spread of new technologies has changed the way European citizens gain access to the media and to information,
K. ker v spletnem okolju ni več mogoče ohraniti tradicionalnih meja v medijskem sektorju, saj tradicionalni mediji ne morejo preživeti, ne da bi se v skladu s cilji digitalne agende EU razširili na nove platforme (kot so storitve SMS, spletne strani in aplikacije za pametne telefone)
K. whereas traditional boundaries in the media sector can no longer be upheld in the online environment, since traditional media cannot survive without expanding into new platforms (such as SMS services, web pages and applications for smartphones), in line with the objectives of the EU's Digital Agenda,
L. ker so časopisi in revije bistvene sestavine pluralistične in raznolike evropske medijske krajine in bi to morali biti še naprej,
L. whereas newspapers and magazines are, and should continue to be, essential components in a pluralistic and diverse European media landscape,
M. ker postajajo ponudniki telekomunikacijskih in internetnih storitev, pa tudi spletni iskalniki, v novem medijskem okolju vse pomembnejši,
M. whereas telecom providers, internet service providers and search engines are playing an ever-increasing role in the new media environment,
N. ker je v digitalni dobi, ki jo označuje večja izbira potrošnikov, a tudi nevarnost razdrobljenosti občinstva, vse večja koncentracija medijev, vzpon vertikalno integriranih medijskih podjetij, prehod na plačljive storitve in kodiranje, javna radiotelevizija pomaga in bi morala pomagati pri ohranjanju javne sfere z zagotavljanjem visokokakovostnih, družbeno koristnih programov in objektivnih informacij,
N. whereas in the digital era – which is characterised by increased consumer choice, but also by a risk of audience fragmentation, increasing media concentration, the rise of vertically integrated media companies, a shift towards pay services and encryption – public service broadcasting does and should help to maintain a public sphere, providing high quality, socially valuable programming and objective information,
O. ker javna radiotelevizija v nekaterih državah članicah še ni dovolj ukoreninjena v družbi in nima na razpolago zadostnih sredstev,
O. whereas in certain Member States public service broadcasting is not yet sufficiently socially embedded and does not have adequate resources at its disposal,
P. ker imajo javne radiotelevizijske ustanove v nekaterih državah članicah velike težave, ki ogrožajo njihovo politično neodvisnost, sposobnost za preživetje in celo njihovo finančno osnovi ter neposredno ogrožajo sam obstoj dvojnega sistema,
P. whereas public broadcasters in some Member States are confronted with major problems that jeopardise their political independence, their viability and even their financial basis, posing a direct threat to the very existence of the dual system,
Q. ker se je komercialna televizija nedavno spopadala z ekonomskimi težavami zaradi recesije v oglaševanju,
Q. whereas commercial television has recently faced economic hardship as a result of the advertising recession,
R. ker so v skladu z načeli Amsterdamskega protokola izključno države članice pristojne za določitev nalog javnih služb in morajo poskrbeti za financiranje svojih javnih radiotelevizij,
R. whereas it lies within the exclusive competence of the Member States to define the public service remit and to provide for the funding of their public service broadcasters, in accordance with the principles of the Amsterdam Protocol,
S. ker javni mediji potrebujejo dovolj javnih sredstev, udeležbo v ustreznih novih tehnologijah in platformah ter stabilno in predvidljivo regulativno okolje, da bi lahko izpolnili svojo nalogo s ponudbo kulturnih in informativnih vsebin na visoki ravni ter bi tako jasno razvijali medijsko pismenost v javno korist,
S. whereas public service media need sufficient public funding, participation in relevant new technologies and platforms and a stable and foreseeable regulatory environment in order to be able to fulfil their remit in terms of offering a high standard of cultural and news content, and as such explicitly to develop media literacy for the benefit of the public,
T. ker je javno radiotelevizijo mogoče izboljšati z izmenjavo izkušenj in dobre prakse med državami članicami,
T. whereas public service broadcasting can be improved through exchanges of experience and best practice between the Member States,
U. ker bi morali biti spoštovanje evropskih standardov v zvezi s svobodo izražanja, medijski pluralizem ter neodvisnost, naloge in financiranje javnih medijev prednostne naloge vseh držav članic,
U. whereas respect for European standards relating to freedom of expression, media pluralism and the independence, remit and funding of public service media should be a priority for all the Member States,
V. ker EU trenutno ne premore primernih instrumentov, s katerimi bi spremljala in se odzivala na ogrožanje javnih medijev in dvojnega sistema v državah članicah ali določenih regijah EU,
V. whereas the EU does not currently have the appropriate instruments at its disposal to monitor, and react to, threats to public service media and the dual system in Member States or specific regions of the EU,
3. ugotavlja, da soobstoj javnih in zasebnih medijev močno prispeva k inovacijam in diverzifikaciji ponudbe vsebin ter pozitivno vpliva na kakovost;
Notes that the coexistence of public service and private media has greatly contributed to innovation and diversification in terms of content and has had a positive impact on quality;
12. poudarja, da nekatere države članice nimajo pravnih določb glede dejavnosti javne radiotelevizije na internetu in da bi to lahko vplivalo na sposobnost tega sektorja za širitev na nove platforme;
Emphasises that the lack in some Member States of legal provisions relating to public service broadcasting activities on the internet could affect the sector’s ability to expand into new platforms;
1. , ki upošteva pravico javnih radiotelevizij, da so dejavne na vseh pomembnih distribucijskih platformah in ponovno poudarja, da so države članice pristojne za opredelitev nalog, financiranja in organizacije javnih radiotelevizij, hkrati pa upoštevajo odgovornost Komisije za preverjanje očitnih napak, ter poziva države članice, naj ohranijo ravnotežje med ponujenimi digitalnimi medijskimi storitvami, zagotovijo pošteno konkurenco med javno radiotelevizijo in zasebnimi mediji in tako ohranijo živahno medijsko krajino v spletnem okolju;
1. , which recognises the right of public service broadcasters to be present on all relevant distribution platforms and reaffirms the competence of the Member States to define the remit, funding and organisation of public service broadcasting while acknowledging the Commission's responsibility to check for manifest errors, and calls on the Member States to maintain a balance amongst the digital media services on offer, to ensure fair competition between public service broadcasting and private media and thus to preserve a vibrant media landscape in the online environment;
18. opozarja države članice, da so se zavezale tem evropskim standardom, in priporoča, da zagotovijo primerno, sorazmerno in stalno financiranje javnih medijev, da bi ti lahko izpolnili svoje naloge, zagotovili politično in ekonomsko neodvisnost ter prispevali k vključujoči informacijski družbi in družbi znanja z reprezentativnimi, visokokakovostnimi in vsem dostopnimi mediji;
Reminds the Member States of their commitment to these European standards, and recommends that they provide appropriate, proportionate and stable funding for public service media so as to enable them to fulfil their remit, guarantee political and economic independence and contribute to an inclusive information and knowledge society with representative, high quality media available to all;
23. poziva Komisijo, naj dvojnemu sistemu, kot delu pravnega reda EU, nameni več pozornosti v okviru pristopnih pogajanj, in vztraja, da je treba spremljati napredek, ki ga države kandidatke pri tem dosegajo;
Calls on the Commission to give higher priority to the dual system as a part of the EU acquis in the context of accession negotiations, and urges that the progress made by candidate countries in this respect be monitored;
Radiotelevizija je edinstveno področje.
Broadcasting is a unique sector.
Sooblikuje vrednote in javno mnenje in za večino državljanov EU ostaja glavni vir informacij.
It influences people’s values and opinions and is still the main source of information for most citizens in the EU.
Zaradi tega je zelo pomembna za varstvo in pospeševanje temeljnih svoboščin in demokracije, vključno s socialno kohezijo.
Therefore it has special significance for the protection and promotion of fundamental freedoms and democracy, including social cohesion.
Dvojni sistem kot del pravnega reda EU
Dual system part of EU acquis
Kot je poudarjeno v direktivi o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah
As underlined by the Audiovisual Media Services Directive
Direktiva 2010/13/EU (UL L 95, 15.4.2010, str.
Directive 2010/13/EU (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p.
1). , je za avdiovizualno krajino v EU značilen tako imenovani dvojni sistem.
1). , the EU audiovisual landscape is characterised by what has been described as ‘the dual system’.
K temu spada močan, vzdržen in ustrezno financiran sistem javne radiotelevizije.
A strong, viable and well-funded public service broadcasting system is part of this.
V dobro delujočem dvojnem sistemu lahko javne radiotelevizijske ustanove dvigujejo standarde na trgu.
In a well functioning dual system, the public service broadcasters (PSB) can raise the standards in the market.
Obveza EU glede vloge javnih radiotelevizijskih ustanov
EU-commitment to the role of public service broadcasters ( PSBs )
V Protokolu 29 PEU
In the Protocol 29 of the TUE
Protokol o sistemu javne radiotelevizije v državah članicah (UL C 83, 30.3.2010, str.
Protocol on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States (OJ C 83, 30.3.2010, p.
312), uradno znan kot amsterdamski protokol. se je EU obvezala k sistemu javne radiotelevizije v državah članicah, „ob upoštevanju neposredne povezanosti sistema javne radiotelevizije v državah članicah z demokratičnimi, socialnimi in kulturnimi potrebami vsake družbe in potrebe po ohranitvi medijske pluralnosti“.
312) formally known as the Protocol of Amsterdam. , the EU has committed itself to the system of public broadcasting in the Member States, ‘considering that it is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and to the need to preserve media pluralism.’