natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
7. poudarja, da Galileo ni le prvi veliki tovrstni projekt EU, ampak je tudi v javnem interesu na ravni EU, kar upravičuje financiranje z javnimi sredstvi; poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša vodenje projektov, v najkrajšem možnem obdobju zagotovi konkurenčnost in normalno delovanje storitve z naborom 30 satelitov, prepreči nejasnosti in da udeležencem na trgu pozitiven znak; opozarja, da lahko med sedanjimi naložbenimi stroški in prihodnjimi tekočimi stroški pride do znatnih razlik; zato podpira predlog, da bi v prihodnosti za tovrstne obsežne projekte vnaprej določili letni znesek, ki bo financiran iz proračuna EU, pri čemer bi bile države članice pristojne predvsem za financiranje morebitnih dodatnih stroškov in bi v proračun EU dodelile dodatna sredstva, obenem pa opredelili področja s premajhno porabo sredstev v proračunu EU, kar bi lahko pripomoglo k financiranju dodatnih potreb takšnih obsežnih projektov;
Stresses that not only is Galileo actually the first major EU-owned project of this type, but it also addresses a requirement that is in the public interest at EU level, thus justifying recourse to public financing; calls on the Commission to improve the management of the project, to ensure that a service involving a constellation of 30 satellites can be competitive and fully operational within the shortest possible period, to avoid uncertainties and to send a positive signal to market players; points out that there may prove to be substantial differences between current investment costs and future running costs; supports, therefore, the proposal that in the future, where large-scale projects such as this are concerned, a predetermined annual amount should be covered from the EU budget and that the Member States should be responsible mainly for financing any additional cost by making available supplementary funding to the EU budget, while identifying under-spent areas of that budget along with other funding sources, including innovative forms of financing , which could help to finance additional needs arising from such large-scale projects;
10. poudarja, da je ocena zneska (1,9 milijarde EUR) iz vmesnega poročila za obdobje do leta 2013 navedena zgolj kot okvirna; meni, da bi morala zato Komisija oblikovati strategijo za srednje- in dolgoročno financiranje programov GNSS po letu 2013, pa tudi preučiti zamisel o določitvi letnega zneska za obdobje 2014–2020, ki bi moralo zajemati stroške dokončanja infrastrukture Galilea in njenega vzdrževanja do leta 2020.
Points out that the estimated figure (EUR 1.9 billion) included in the mid-term review for the period after 2013 is presented as being purely indicative; takes the view that the Commission should therefore set out a medium-term and long-term financing strategy for the GNSS programmes post-2013, including exploring the idea of setting an annual amount for the 2014-2020 period, which would need to cover the completion of the Galileo infrastructure and its maintenance costs up to 2020.
Poročevalec: Roberto Gualtieri
Rapporteur: Roberto Gualtieri
POROČILO MANJŠINE..........................................................................................................23
MINORITY REPORT...............................................................................................................23
o razvoju skupne varnostne in obrambne politike po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe
on the development of the common security and defence policy following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty
– – ob upoštevanju Naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Title V of the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov,
– having regard to the Charter of the United Nations,
– ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije z naslovom „Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu“, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 12. decembra 2003, in poročila o njenem izvajanju z naslovom „Zagotavljanje varnosti v spreminjajočem se svetu“, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel 11. in 12. decembra 2008,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy entitled ‘A secure Europe in a better world’, adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003, and to the report on its implementation entitled ‘Providing security in a changing world’, endorsed by the European Council on 11-12 December 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za zunanje zadeve (obrambo) o skupni varnostni in obrambni politiki (SVOP), sprejetih 9. decembra 2010 in 31. januarja 2011,
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs (Defence) Council conclusions on the CSDP adopted on 9 December 2010 and on 31 January 2011,
– ob upoštevanju izida francosko-britanskega vrha o varnostnem in obrambnem sodelovanju z dne 2. novembra 2010,
– having regard to the outcome of the UK-France Summit on security and defence cooperation of 2 November 2010,
– ob upoštevanju strategije o notranji varnosti za Evropsko unijo, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 25. in 26. marca 2010,
– having regard to the Internal Security Strategy for the European Union, endorsed by the European Council on 25-26 March 2010,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta o organizaciji in delovanju Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje z dne 26. julija 2010
– having regard to the Council Decision of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 23. novembra 2010 o civilno-vojaškem sodelovanju in razvoju civilno-vojaških zmogljivosti
– having regard to its resolution of 23 November 2010 on civilian-military cooperation and the development of civilian-military capabilities
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0419 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0419 . ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 10. marca 2010 o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije in skupne varnostne in obrambne politike
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2010 on the implementation of the European Security Strategy and the Common Security and Defence Policy
UL C 349E, 22.12.2010, str.
OJ C 349E, 22.12.2010, p .63. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0166/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0166/2011 ),
Varnostna in zunanja politika
Security and foreign policy
(a) sta SZVP in SVOP, ki je sestavni del prve, umeščeni v pravno zavezujoč institucionalni okvir načel EU (kot so demokracija, vladavina prava, univerzalnost in neločljivost človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva, enakosti in solidarnosti ter spoštovanje načel ustanovne listine Združenih narodov in načel mednarodnega prava, vključno z odgovornostjo za zaščito) ter da so njuni cilji združeni s splošnimi cilji zunanjega delovanja EU;
(a) the CFSP and the CSDP, which is an integral part thereof, have been placed within the legally binding institutional framework of EU principles (democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity, and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter and principles of international law, including the Responsibility to Protect), and their objectives have been merged with the general objectives of the EU ’ s external action;
(b) EU mora pri izvajanju svoje zunanje in varnostne politike zagotavljati doslednost in skladnost med različnimi področji svojega zunanjega delovanja ter med zunanjimi in notranjimi politikami; ugotavlja, da ima podpredsednik/visoki predstavnik v zvezi s tem posebno odgovornost;
(b) when conducting foreign and security policy the EU must ensure consistency and coherence between the different areas of its external action and between external and internal policies; notes that the VP/HR has a special responsibility in this matter;
(c) podpredsednik/visoki predstavnik vodi v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami SZVP, skupaj s Komisijo predlaga odločitve v zvezi s skupno varnostno in obrambno politiko, njene misije ter uporabo nacionalnih virov in instrumentov Evropske unije, usklajuje, če je to potrebno, civilne in vojaške vidike in predseduje Svetu za zunanje zadeve, obenem pa deluje tudi kot podpredsednik Komisije, pristojen za njene zunanjepolitične odnose in za usklajevanje in skladnost celotnega zunanjega delovanja EU;
(c) the VP/HR, in close cooperation with the Member States, conducts the CFSP, proposes CSDP decisions, missions and the use of national resources and Union instruments together with the Commission, and, where appropriate, coordinates their civilian and military aspects, and chairs the Foreign Affairs Council, serving also as the Commission Vice-President in charge both of the Commission's external relations responsibilities and of coordinating, and providing consistency in, EU external action as a whole;
7. zato izraža zaskrbljenost, da več kot eno leto potem, ko je stopila v veljavo Lizbonska pogodba, še ni jasnih znakov polizbonskega celostnega pristopa EU, s pomočjo katerega bi lahko, ko gre za varnost evropskih državljanov, premostili tradicionalne postopkovne in institucionalne ovire, obenem pa ohranili ustrezne pravne prerogative;
Expresses concern, therefore, that, more than one year after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, there are not yet clear signs of a post-Lisbon EU comprehensive approach enabling traditional procedural and institutional barriers to be overcome, while preserving the respective legal prerogatives when European citizens' security is at stake;
12. poudarja, da je Evropski parlament zaradi vloge, ki mu je dodeljena kot telesu, ki neposredno zastopa državljane Unije, bistven vir demokratične legitimnosti SZVP/SVOP in da lahko upravičeno zahteva ustrezno obravnavo svojih mnenj in priporočil;
Points out that the role conferred on the European Parliament as the body directly representing EU citizens makes Parliament a vital source of democratic legitimacy for the CFSP/CSDP and lends weight to its right to expect that its opinions and recommendations will be taken properly into consideration;
15. poudarja vlogo, ki jo pogodbe podeljujejo Komisiji glede izvajanja politik in ukrepov, povezanih z drugimi razsežnostmi zunanjega delovanja Unije, pravice do zakonodajne pobude, izvrševanja proračuna in upravljanja programov Skupnosti ter organiziranja zunanjega zastopanja Evropske unije razen v primeru SZVP; poziva Svet, Komisijo in Parlament, naj okrepijo medsebojno sodelovanje in ob spoštovanju svojih pooblastil zagotovijo skladnost med različnimi področji zunanjega delovanja EU in učinkovitejšo uporabo instrumentov SVOP;
Emphasises the role which the Treaties have assigned to the Commission in carrying out the policies and measures linked to the other dimensions of EU external action, in proposing legislative initiatives, in implementing the budget and managing Community programmes, and in organising external representation of the EU except in the case of the CFSP; calls on the Council, the Commission and Parliament to strengthen their cooperation in order to ensure, without prejudice to their respective prerogatives, consistency between the different areas of EU external action for more effective use of CSDP instruments;
18. potrjuje svojo podporo boljšemu usklajevanju in večji sinergiji med civilnimi in vojaškimi strukturami in zmogljivostmi za obvladovanje kriznih razmer v okviru celostnega pristopa in ob hkratnem ohranjanju razlik med civilnimi in vojaškimi vlogami ter različnimi postopki odločanja in linijami poveljevanja;
Reiterates its view that the civilian and military crisis management structures and capabilities should be coordinated more closely and should act more synergistically within the comprehensive approach, without altering the distinctions between civilian and military roles and the different decision-making procedures and chains of command;
20. meni, da bi moral odbor za krizno upravljanje Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje zagotoviti enotno krizno načrtovanje v zvezi z morebitnimi kriznimi območji in scenariji, po drugi strani pa tudi s pomočjo krizne platforme praktično vodenje odzivanja na krizo, pri čemer bi moral tako v Bruslju kot na terenu usklajevati uporabo različnih finančnih instrumentov in razpoložljivih zmogljivosti Unije, ne da bi pri tem posegal v specifične postopke odločanja in pravne podlage, ki veljajo za uporabo civilnih in vojaških zmogljivosti v okviru SZVP/SVOP ali za uporabo instrumentov Skupnosti;
Believes that the Crisis Management Board should provide the EEAS with unified contingency planning in relation to potential theatres and crisis scenarios and, secondly, also through a crisis platform for practical crisis response management, working both in Brussels and on the ground to coordinate the use of the various financial instruments and deployment of capabilities available to the EU, without undermining the specific decision-making procedures and legal bases applying to the deployment of civilian and military capabilities under the CFSP/CSDP or to the use of Community instruments;
(a) poziva h krepitvi enote za operativno načrtovanje civilnih misij znotraj civilne zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij (CPCC);
(a) calls for expansion of the CPCC unit responsible for operational planning of civilian missions;
(b) ponovno poziva, naj se Služba za instrumente zunanje politike, ki je zadolžena za načrtovanje in programiranje ukrepov za odzivanje na krizne razmere v skladu s členom 3 instrumenta za stabilnost, vključi v strukture Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje na področju kriznega upravljanja in izgradnje miru in naj se nekdanja delovna mesta Relex/A2, ki so bila v okviru novih instrumentov zunanje politike dodeljena Enoti 2 (12 mest AD in 5 mest AST), prenesejo na Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje; poudarja, da je takšen prenos pogoj za sprostitev rezerve pod ustrezno postavko proračuna Komisije;
(b) renews its call for the Foreign Policy Instruments Service (FPIS) in charge of planning and programming the Instrument for Stability Article 3 crisis response measures to be integrated into the EEAS crisis management and peacebuilding structures and, specifically, for the former Relex/A2 posts assigned to Unit 2 of the new foreign policy instruments (12 AD and 5 AST) to be transferred to the EEAS; points out that this transfer is a condition which has to be satisfied in order to release the reserve under the corresponding heading in the Commission budget;
(c) podpira vzpostavitev centra skupnih služb za upravljanje nalog SVOP oziroma medinstitucionalnega urada, ki bo zajemal Enoto 3 Komisije (operacije SZVP na področju instrumentov zunanje politike – nekdanja enota Relex/A3) in Enoto za podporo misijam v okviru civilne zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij (CPCC); ugotavlja, da bi nova služba s tem, ko bi prevzela odgovornosti na področju kadrovske politike, logistike, javnih naročil in finančnih virov civilnih misij SVOP in vodje misij razbremenila dela upravnih nalog, zagotavljala večjo učinkovitost tako z združevanjem upravnih funkcij, od izbora in zaposlovanjem osebja do centralizacije javnih naročil in upravljanja opreme;
(c) supports the establishment of a Shared Services Centre for the management of CSDP missions, that is to say, an interinstitutional office comprising the Commission’s Unit 3 (CFSP Operations of the Foreign Policy Instruments – formerly Relex/A3) and the CPCC Mission Support Unit; notes that the new Service, by addressing the personnel, logistics, procurement and financial responsibilities of the civilian CSDP missions and by relieving the Heads of Mission from part of their administrative duties, would guarantee greater efficiency both by pooling administrative functions, starting with the selection and recruitment of personnel, and by centralising procurement and equipment management;
25. z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da lahko trenutni varčevalni ukrepi privedejo do zmanjšanja sredstev, ki na evropski ravni ni usklajeno, in do nadaljnjega podvajanja, ki lahko postavi pod vprašaj tudi samo SZVP, namesto da bi države članice usmerili k smotrnejši porabi sredstev, namenjenih obrambi, pri čemer bi države združile in si delile večji delež obrambnih zmogljivosti, proračuna in zahtev ter tako dosegle večjo varnost za svoje državljane; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo večjo preglednost svojih obrambnih proračunov;
Notes with anxiety that the current economic austerity could lead to cuts that were not concerted at European level and to continuing overlapping that might call the CSDP as such into question, whereas the end effect should be to push the Member States towards smarter defence spending whereby they would pool and share a larger proportion of their defence capabilities, budget and requirements while achieving more security for their citizens; calls on Member States to develop greater transparency regarding their respective defence budgets;
27. obžaluje pogosto podvajanje obrambnih programov v EU, kot je na primer več kot 20 programov za oklepna vozila, šest različnih programov za bojne podmornice, pet programov za rakete zrak-zemlja in trije programi za bojna zračna plovila in njihove posledice, kar pomeni, da ekonomije obsega niso dosežene, tratijo se omejena ekonomska sredstva, cene evropske obrambne opreme pa so pretirano visoke, kar poleg tega vodi k nadaljevanju razdrobljenosti evropske obrambne tehnološke in industrijske osnove (EDTIB), ovira konkurenčnost vse z obrambo povezane industrije v Evropi in v tem pogledu neposredno ogroža tehnološki vodilni položaj in delovna mesta;
Deplores the widespread overlapping of defence programmes in the EU, such as the more than 20 armoured vehicle programmes, the 6 different attack submarine programmes, the 5 ground-to-air missile programmes and the 3 combat aircraft programmes, and its consequences, namely that economies of scale are not achieved, limited economic resources are wasted, and the prices of European defence equipment are over-inflated, which moreover leads to continuing fragmentation of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB), hampers the competitiveness of the whole security-related industrial sector in Europe and in this regard directly endangers technological leadership and employment;
31. poudarja, da stalno strukturirano sodelovanje, kot ga opredeljuje Pogodba, zagotavlja pravne zaščitne ukrepe in obveznosti, ter je obenem tudi instrument za spodbujanje boljše uporabe sredstev SVOP v časih gospodarske krize in premagovanje pomanjkanja konsenza med državami članicami; poziva Svet in države članice, naj brez odlašanja opredelijo cilje in vsebine takega sodelovanja, ki naj vključuje vse države članice, ki izkažejo politično voljo in vojaško zmogljivost;
Emphasises that the Permanent Structured Cooperation, as laid down in the Treaty, provides legal safeguards and obligations, and is also an instrument to promote better use of CSDP assets in times of economic austerity and to overcome a lack of consensus among Member States; calls on the Council and the Member States to determine the aims and substance of such cooperation without further delay, involving all the Member States which prove themselves to be both politically willing and militarily capable;
40. priznava ustreznost bojnih skupin, vendar poziva k resnemu premisleku glede koncepta in strukture teh skupin, ki do sedaj v praksi še niso delovale, v smislu povečanja prožnosti in učinkovitosti; meni, da:
Recognises the soundness of the Battlegroups, but calls for the concept and the structure of the Battlegroups, which have so far never been deployed, to be carefully reviewed for an increased degree of flexibility and efficiency; believes that
- bi lahko premislili o tem, da bi se ena od obeh bojnih skupin specializirala za nišne zmogljivosti in/ali zmogljivosti, primerne za spopade nizke intenzivnosti, ki vključujejo civilno-vojaške naloge;
- consideration could be given to specialising one of the two Battlegroups in niche capabilities and/or capabilities suited to low-intensity conflicts entailing mixed civilian-military tasks;
41. poudarja, da Pogodba določa, naj se evropska politika zmogljivosti in oboroževanja določi v sodelovanju z Evropsko obrambno agencijo, ter institucije in telesa EU in države članice poziva, naj sodelujejo pri oblikovanju in izvajanju te politike;
Underlines the Treaty reference to a European capabilities and armaments policy to be defined with the participation of the EDA and calls for the cooperation of the EU institutions, bodies and Member States to this end in the framing and implementation of such a policy;
45. poziva k tesnemu sodelovanju med Evropsko obrambno agencijo in Skupno organizacijo za sodelovanje na področju oboroževanja (OCCAR); zahteva, da ga vodja Evropske obrambne agencije (podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica) obvešča o rezultatih pogajanj o upravnem dogovoru o sodelovanju, ki so se začela aprila 2010;
45 Calls for strong cooperation between the EDA and the Organisation Conjointe de Coopération en matière d'ARmement (OCCAR); requests information from the head of the EDA (HR/VP) on the results of the negotiations on an Administrative Arrangement for their cooperation which started in April 2009;
- (do 30. junija 2011) Direktivo 2009/43/ES o prenosu obrambnih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti, in
- (by 30 June 2011) Directive 2009/43/EC on transfer of defence-related products within the Community, and
- (do 31. avgusta 2011) Direktivo 2009/81/ES o postopkih za oddajo naročil na področju obrambe in varnosti;
- (by 31 August 2011) Directive 2009/81/EC on procedures for the award of contracts in the fields of defence and security;
48. priporoča nujen pregled izvajanja Skupnega stališča Sveta, ki opredeljuje skupna pravila glede nadzora izvoza vojaške tehnologije in opreme, z dne 8. decembra 2008, da se zagotovi stroga in dosledna skladnost delovanja vseh nacionalnih organov, ki so vključeni v državah članicah;
Recommends that the implementation of the Common Position defining unified rules on the control of technology and military exports adopted on 8 December 2008 be urgently reviewed, in order to ensure strict and consistent compliance by all national authorities involved in each Member State;
51. poziva sodelujoče države članice, naj sodelovanje v Evropski obrambni agenciji obravnavajo kot stalno zavezo in ji zagotovijo potrebne človeške in ekonomske vire; poziva k povišanju izdatkov, namenjenih operativnim projektom in študijam (ki so povprečno predstavljali približno 25 % proračuna), če bi se, žal, glasovanje z vetom glede povečanja proračuna še naprej nadaljevalo;
Urges the participating Member States to regard their participation in the EDA as a permanent commitment and to provide the Agency with the necessary human and economic resources; calls for the expenditure earmarked for operational projects and studies (which has hitherto accounted – on average – for about 25% of the budget) to be raised in the unwelcome event that vetoes on budget increases were to continue for a lengthy period;
53. meni, da je treba v EU sprejeti regulativne ukrepe, vključno s celovitim normativnim sistemom za ustanovitev, registracijo, licenciranje, spremljanje in poročanje o kršitvah veljavne zakonodaje s strani zasebnih vojaških družb in zasebnih varnostnih služb na notranji in zunanji ravni;
Considers that the adoption of EU regulatory measures, including a comprehensive normative system for the establishment, registration, licensing, monitoring and reporting on violations of applicable law by private military and security (PMS) companies - both at internal and external level –, is necessary;
– na notranji ravni s pripravo priporočila, ki omogoča sprejetje direktive za usklajevanje nacionalnih ukrepov za reguliranje storitev zasebnih vojaških družb in zasebnih varnostnih služb, tudi glede ponudnikov storitev in naročanja storitev;
- for the internal level, the drafting of a Recommendation paving the way for a Directive aimed at harmonising national measures regulating PMSC services, including service providers and the procurement of services;