natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– pomemben del predloga je oblikovanje kontaktnih in informacijskih točk v posameznih državah članicah EU, od katerih lahko nacionalni organi in trgovci zahtevajo podatke o določenih izdelkih.
- an important part of the proposal is the creation of contact and information points in individual EU Member States from whom both national authorities and traders can request information on specific products.
Te točke bodo povezane v telematsko omrežje.
These points will be connected in a ‘telematic’ network.
V zvezi z uporabo načela vzajemnega priznavanja za tiste izdelke, ki niso usklajeni, in v zvezi z besedilom predloga pripravljavec mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko pozdravlja predlog Komisije, saj je zelo pomemben za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja in prost pretok blaga.
Concerning the application of the principle of mutual recognition in the non-harmonised field of products and the text of the proposal, the draftsman of the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy welcomes the Commission’s proposal because it is of great significance for the implementation of the principle of mutual recognition and for the free movement of goods.
Doslej praksa namreč ni bila enotna.
This is because practice has not, to date, been uniform.
Čeprav je načelo zapisano v členih 28 in 30 Pogodbe o ES, se nekatera podjetja znajdejo v težavah pri iskanju dostopa do drugega trga znotraj EU, pogosto zaradi nepoznavanja načela in področja njegove uporabe.
Although the principle itself is enshrined in Articles 28 and 30 of the EC Treaty, several companies are confronted with problems when seeking access to another market within the EU, often because of ignorance of the existence or scope of the principle.
Predlog pravilno prenaša breme dokazovanja na države članice, ki morajo dokazati, zakaj izdelek izpolnjuje merila iz člena 30 Pogodbe ali sodb Sodišča evropskih skupnosti in da zato ni treba uporabiti načela vzajemnega priznavanja.
The proposal itself rightly transfers the burden of proof back to the Member States, who must demonstrate that a product fulfils one of the criteria laid down in Article 30 of the Treaty or in other judgments of the European Court of Justice and that, therefore, the principle of mutual recognition does not have to be applied.
V zvezi s sedanjo prakso in različnimi stališči nacionalnih organov in trgovcev, ki izvažajo izdelke na trge drugih držav članic, pripravljavec mnenja meni, da bo predlog vzpostavil pravično ravnotežje med trgovci in državnimi organi, ki odločajo o dostopu na trg.
Concerning current practice and the different positions of national authorities and traders exporting their products to the markets of other Member States, the draftsman is of the opinion that the proposal will strike a fair balance between traders and the state bodies taking decisions on market access.
Pripravljavec osnutka predlaga zlasti naslednje spremembe:
The draftsman proposes the following changes in particular:
– ker je sodelovanje med kontaktnimi točkami na nacionalni in evropski ravni izjemno pomembno in zagotavlja boljšo izmenjavo informacij o nacionalni zakonodaji in posebnem izvajanju nacionalnih predpisov, se predlaga ustrezna sprememba člena 9.
- As cooperation between contact points at national and European level is of vital importance and ensures better exchange of information on national legislation and specific implementation of national norms, it is proposed that Article 9 be changed accordingly.
Ta uredba se uporablja za sklepe v zvezi s katerim koli industrijskim izdelkom ali kmetijskim proizvodom, vključno s proizvodi iz rib , ki se zakonito trži v drugi državi članici, sprejete na podlagi tehničnega predpisa, če je neposredni ali posredni učinek tega sklepa kar koli od naslednjega:
This Regulation applies to decisions taken in respect of any industrially manufactured product or agricultural product, including fish products, lawfully marketed in another Member State, on the basis of a technical rule, where the direct or indirect effect of that decision is any of the following:
Ta uredba se uporablja za sklepe v zvezi s katerim koli blagom , ki se zakonito trži v drugi državi članici, sprejete na podlagi tehničnega predpisa, če je neposredni ali posredni učinek tega sklepa kar koli od naslednjega:
This Regulation applies to decisions taken in respect of any goods lawfully marketed in another Member State, on the basis of a technical rule, where the direct or indirect effect of that decision is any of the following:
Usklajeno s terminologijo, uporabljeno v Pogodbi in sodni praksi Sodišča evropskih skupnosti.
Consistency with the terminologies used in the Treaty and in the ECJ jurisprudence.
Člen 2, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1, točka (b)
Article 2, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1, point (b)
(b) odklonitev dovoljenja za dajanje izdelka ali vrste izdelka na trg;
(b) to refuse to allow the product or type of product to be placed on the market;
(b) odklonitev dovoljenja za dajanje blaga ali vrste blaga na trg oziroma njegovo uporabo ;
(b) to refuse to allow the goods or type of goods to be placed on the market or used ;
S tem besedilom je zajeta cela vrsta možnih situacij.
This wording would enable to cover the whole scale of possible situations.
Člen 2, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1, točka (c)
Article 2, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1, point (c)
(c) zahteva po prilagoditvi izdelka ali vrste izdelka pred dajanjem na trg ali nadaljnjim trgovanjem z njim;
(c) to require modification of the product or type of product before it can be placed or kept on the market;
(c) zahteva po prilagoditvi ali certificiranju blaga ali vrste blaga pred dajanjem na trg ali nadaljnjim trgovanjem z njim;
(c) to require modification or certification of the goods or type of goods before they can be placed or kept on the market;
Sedanje besedilo uredbe državam članicam prepoveduje, da od trgovcev zahtevajo, naj svoje izdelke prilagodijo tehničnim zahtevam države uvoznice.
The current wording of the regulation prohibits Member States from requesting that traders adapt their products to the technical requirements of the importing country.
Vendar se od trgovcev pogosto zahteva, da se njihovo blago v državi uvoznici pregleda, čeprav so bili izdelki že pregledani v državi, kjer so bili izdelani, in imajo ustrezne certifikate.
However, traders are often required to have their products checked in the importing country despite the fact that their products have been checked in the country in which they were produced and have the appropriate certificates.
To je kršitev načela vzajemnega priznavanja, ki trgovcem povzroča odvečne stroške.
This is in contravention of the principle of mutual recognition and represents more unnecessary expense for traders.
Zahteve za neupravičene preglede so zato prav tako škodljive kot zahteve za prilagajanje izdelkov.
Requesting unjustified checks is therefore just as harmful as requesting that products be adapted.
Za potrebe točke (c) iz prvega pododstavka pomeni prilagoditev izdelka ali vrste izdelka kakršno koli spremembo ene ali več značilnosti nekega izdelka ali vrste izdelka , navedene v tehnični specifikaciji, v smislu člena 1(3) Direktive 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta .
For the purposes of point (c) of the first subparagraph, modification of the product or type of product means any modification of one or more of the characteristics of a particular product or a particular type of product as listed in a technical specification within the meaning of Article 1(3) of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council .
Za potrebe točke (c) iz prvega pododstavka pomeni prilagoditev blaga ali vrste blaga kakršno koli spremembo ene ali več značilnosti nekega blaga ali vrste blaga , navedene v odstavku 2(a) .
For the purposes of point (c) of the first subparagraph, modification of the goods or type of goods means any modification of one or more of the characteristics of particular goods or a particular type of goods as listed in paragraph 2(a) .
Ni se treba sklicevati na direktivo 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, saj so zadevne določbe te direktive (opredelitev tehnične specifikacije) navedene v členu 2(2)(a).
There is no reason to refer to Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, as the relevant provisions of that directive (definition of the technical specification) are set out in Article 2(2)(a).
Zato je z zakonodajnega stališča preprosteje in jasneje, če se sklicevanje na direktivo 98/34/ES nadomesti s sklicevanjem na člen 2(2)(a) osnutka uredbe.
It is, therefore, simpler and clearer from a legislative point of view to replace the reference to Directive 98/34/EC with a reference to Article 2(2)(a) of the draft regulation
Člen 4, odstavek 1, pododstavek -1 (novo)
Article 4, paragraph 1, subparagraph -1 (new)
Nacionalni organi morajo v vsakem primeru dokazati, da je uporaba nacionalnih tehničnih predpisov pri posameznem blagu, ki se zakonito trži v drugi državi članici, upravičena na podlagi člena 30 Pogodbe o ES ali drugega višjega razloga v javnem interesu.
It is for the national authority to show in each case that the application of national technical rules to specific goods lawfully marketed in another Member State is justified on the grounds set out in Article 30 of the EC Treaty or by reference to an overriding requirement in the public interest.
Breme dokazovanja mora biti jasno določeno ne samo v uvodnih izjavah (uvodna izjava 14 predloga), temveč tudi v besedilu predloga.
The burden of proof must be clearly stated not only in the recitals (Recital 14 of the proposal) but in the body of the proposal itself.
V primeru, ko namerava nacionalni organ sprejeti sklep iz člena 2(1), nosilcu gospodarske dejavnosti, opredeljenem v členu 5, pošlje pisno obvestilo o tej nameri, v katerem navede tehnični predpis, na katerem bo sklep temeljil, in zadostne tehnične ali znanstvene dokaze, da nameravani ukrep temelji na enem od razlogov v javnem interesu, navedenih v členu 30 Pogodbe, ali se pri tem sklicuje na drug višji razlog v javnem interesu, in da sklep zagotavlja izpolnitev zastavljenega cilja ter ne presega okvira, ki je za to potreben.
Where a national authority intends to adopt a decision as referred to in Article 2(1), it shall send the economic operator identified in accordance with Article 5 written notice of its intention, specifying the technical rule on which the decision is to be based and setting out sufficient technical or scientific evidence that the intended decision is justified on one of the grounds of public interest listed in Article 30 of the Treaty or by reference to another overriding requirement in the public interest, and that it is appropriate for securing the attainment of the objective pursued and does not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain that objective.
V primeru, ko namerava nacionalni organ sprejeti sklep iz člena 2(1), nosilcu gospodarske dejavnosti, opredeljenem v členu 5, ter Komisiji in kontaktni točki za izdelek v zadevni državi članici pošlje pisno obvestilo o tej nameri, v katerem navede tehnični predpis, na katerem bo sklep temeljil, in zadostne tehnične ali znanstvene dokaze, da nameravani ukrep temelji na enem od razlogov v javnem interesu, navedenih v členu 30 Pogodbe, ali se pri tem sklicuje na drug višji razlog v javnem interesu, in da sklep zagotavlja izpolnitev zastavljenega cilja ter ne presega okvira, ki je za to potreben.
Where a national authority intends to adopt a decision as referred to in Article 2(1), it shall send the economic operator identified in accordance with Article 5 , as well as the Commission and the Product Contact Point in that Member State, the written notice of its intention, specifying the technical rule on which the decision is to be based and setting out sufficient technical or scientific evidence that the intended decision is justified on one of the grounds of public interest listed in Article 30 of the Treaty or by reference to another overriding requirement in the public interest, and that it is appropriate for securing the attainment of the objective pursued and does not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain that objective.
Z nalaganjem obveznosti nacionalnim organom, da Komisiji in kontaktni točki za izdelke iz člena 8 sporočijo svoje namere o sprejetju sklepov iz člena 2, se prepreči, da ti sprejemajo neupravičene sklepe.
By imposing on national authorities the obligation to inform the Commission and the Product Contact Point foreseen in article 8 of their intention to adopt a decision foreseen in article 2, the objective is to further prevent national authorities from adopting unjustified decision.
Člen 4, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 4, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Če sklep nacionalnega organa temelji na nacionalnem tehničnem predpisu, se besedilo tega predpisa priloži obvestilu ali pa mora obvestilo navajati, kje je mogoče ta predpis najti.
Where a decision of a national authority is based on a national technical rule, the text of that rule shall be attached to the notice, or the notice shall state where that rule can be consulted.
Nosilcem gospodarske dejavnosti, zlasti malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, je treba olajšati dostop do zadevnih nacionalnih predpisov.
Access to the relevant national technical rules must be made easier for economic operators, in particular for SMEs.
Po prejemu takega obvestila ima zadevni nosilec gospodarske dejavnosti vsaj dvajset delovnih dni , da pošlje svoje pripombe.
The economic operator concerned shall, following receipt of such notice, be allowed at least twenty working days in which to submit comments.
Po prejemu takega obvestila ima zadevni nosilec gospodarske dejavnosti na voljo en mesec , da pošlje svoje pripombe.
The economic operator concerned shall, following receipt of such notice, be allowed one month in which to submit comments.
Ker predlog postavlja dvajsetdnevni rok kot najkrajši možni („vsaj dvajset delovnih dni“), se lahko obdobje v posameznih državah članicah razlikuje.
As the proposal sets a 20-day deadline as a minimum (‘at least twenty working days’), the length of the period may differ in individual Member States.
Enoten rok, veljaven po vsej EU, bi pomembno prispeval h krepitvi pravne varnosti za trgovce.
Setting a single deadline applicable throughout the EU would make a significant contribution to strengthening legal certainty for traders.
Rok bi bilo preprosteje izračunati, če bi bil enomesečen.
As for calculating the deadline, it would appear simpler to change it to one month.
Kadar po predložitvi pisnega obvestila iz prvega odstavka tega člena nacionalni organ sklene, da ne bo sprejel sklepa iz člena 2(1), o tem primerno obvesti zadevnega nosilca gospodarske dejavnosti.
Where, after giving written notification in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, the national authority decides not to adopt a decision as referred to in Article 2(1), it shall inform the economic operator concerned accordingly.
Kadar po predložitvi pisnega obvestila iz prvega odstavka tega člena nacionalni organ sklene, da ne bo sprejel sklepa iz člena 2(1), o tem nemudoma primerno obvesti zadevnega nosilca gospodarske dejavnosti.
Where, after giving written notification in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, the national authority decides not to adopt a decision as referred to in Article 2(1), it shall inform the economic operator concerned accordingly without delay .
Če dobi trgovec pisno obvestilo o nameri za izdajo sklepa za omejitev prostega pretoka izdelka, je v neke vrste negotovosti.
When a trader is served with a written notice of intention to issue a decision restricting the free movement of a product, the trader is in a state of some uncertainty.
Zaželeno je, da je to obdobje negotovosti karseda kratko, saj se nacionalni organ navsezadnje lahko odloči, da ne bo omejil pretoka izdelka.
It is therefore desirable that this period of uncertainty should be kept as brief as possible in case the national authority decides in the end not to restrict the movement of a product.
To bi bilo mogoče rešiti s pojasnilom „nemudoma“ v zadnjem stavku člena 4(3).
A solution would be to add the words ‘without delay’ to the last sentence of Article 4(3).
Organi bi tako morali takoj obvestiti podjetje, če ne bi naložili omejitvenih ukrepov, kar bi preprečilo morebitne zamude pri organih.
The authorities would therefore have to inform the business immediately if restricting measures were not to be imposed, which would avert possible delays on the part of the authorities.
(a) informacije o tehničnih predpisih, ki se na ozemlju države uporabljajo za posamezno vrsto izdelka ;
(a) the technical rules applicable to a specific type of product in the national territory;
(a) informacije o tehničnih predpisih, ki se na ozemlju države uporabljajo za posamezno vrsto blaga, in informacije o izvajanju načela vzajemnega priznavanja ;
(a) the technical rules applicable to a specific type of goods in the national territory and information on the implementation of the principle of mutual recognition ;
Kontaktne točke bi morale zagotavljati informacije o nacionalnih tehničnih predpisih, zlasti pa o tem, kako se uporablja načelo vzajemnega priznavanja.
Contact points should provide information not only on national technical rules but in particular on how the principle of mutual recognition is applied.
Razširitev obveznosti zagotavljanja informacij ne zahteva bistvenega povečanja obsega nalog kontaktnih točk, informacije o vzajemnem priznavanju pa so koristno orodje za trgovce, ki delujejo na notranjem trgu.
Extending the obligation to provide information does not require any fundamental increase in the contact points’ scope of duties, and information on the principle of mutual recognition is a useful tool for traders operating on the internal market.
Večja količina podatkov lahko poveča zaupanje trgovcev v možnosti, ki jih ponuja načelo vzajemnega priznavanja, kar lahko vodi v porast trgovanja s tem blagom na notranjem trgu EU.
An increased level of information can boost traders’ confidence in the possibility of the principle of mutual recognition, which can lead to a growth in the level of trade in such goods on the EU internal market.
Komisija zagotovi sodelovanje in izmenjavo informacij med kontaktnimi točkami za izdelke v vseh državah članicah.
The Commission shall ensure cooperation and the exchange of information between all Product Contact Points in all Member States.
Nacionalno in čezmejno sodelovanje kontaktnih točk za izdelke je njuno za zagotavljanje boljšega pretoka informacij o omejevalnih nacionalnih tehničnih predpisih in o njihovi uporabi.
National and cross-border cooperation of Product Contact Points is necessary to ensure better flow of information on restrictive national technical rules and their practical application.
Sodelovanje na evropski ravni bi morala organizirati Evropska komisija, vendar bi tudi države članice morale biti pripravljene dejavno sodelovati.
Cooperation at European level should be organized by the European Commission, however Member States should also be willing to and cooperate actively.
Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 11(2) vzpostavi telematsko omrežje za izmenjavo informacij med kontaktnimi točkami za izdelke, določenimi v tej uredbi.
The Commission shall establish a telematic network for the implementation of the exchange of information between Product Contact Points under this Regulation, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 11(2).
Vzpostavitev telekomunikacijskega orodja med Komisijo in kontaktnimi točkami za izdelke je izrednega pomena za zagotavljanje nemotenega delovanja trga, zato bi morala biti obvezna, prav tako pa njegova uporaba.
The creation of a telecommunication tool between the Commission and the Product Contact Points is of utmost importance to ensure the smooth functioning of the market, therefore its creation and use should be mandatory.
Komisija v petih letih po datumu, navedenem v členu 14(1), Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju te uredbe.
The Commission shall, within five years following the date specified in Article 13, submit a report on the implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council.
Komisija dve leti po datumu, navedenem v členu 14(1) Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu , predloži poročilo o izvajanju te uredbe.
The Commission shall, two years after the date specified in Article 13, submit a report on the implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council.
Dve leti je razumnejši rok, da se Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi poročilo o izvajanju.
The two years seems to be more reasonable time to provide the European parliament and the Council with the implementation report.
Enako dolg rok je bil uporabljen v direktivi 98/34/ES.
The same time has been used in case of the Directive 98/34/ES.
Ta uredba začne veljati 20. dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta uredba začne veljati tri mesece po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force three months following the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Dvajsetdnevni rok za začetek veljavnosti uredbe je nesorazmerno kratek.
The 20-day deadline for entry into force of the regulation is disproportionately short.
Potrebno je več časa, zlasti za vzpostavitev kontaktnih točk, zagotavljanje informacij vsem zaposlenim v državni upravi, ki bodo dejansko izvajali uredbo, in za morebitne nujne zakonodajne ukrepe, ki se sprejmejo v zvezi z novimi elementi, uvedenimi z uredbo.
A certain amount of time is required, in particular, for the contact points to be set up, for information to be provided to all state administration employees who, in practice, will implement the regulation, and, if necessary, for vital legislative measures to be adopted relating to the new elements introduced by the regulation.
Zato se zdi primerno podaljšati rok na tri mesece.
For these reasons, it would appear appropriate to increase the deadline to three months.
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi postopkov za uporabo nekaterih nacionalnih tehničnih predpisov pri izdelkih, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici, in o razveljavitvi Odločbe 3052/95/ES
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation laying down procedures relating to the application of certain national technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member State and repealing Decision 3052/95/EC
V skladu s členoma 28 in 30 Pogodbe namembne države članice na svojih ozemljih ne morejo prepovedati prodaje izdelkov, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici, a se ne usklajujejo na ravni Skupnosti, razen če so tehnične omejitve, ki jih določi namembna država članica, utemeljene z razlogi, določenimi v členu 30 Pogodbe ES, ali izhajajo iz višjih razlogov splošnega javnega interesa, ki jih priznava sodna praksa Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, in so sorazmerne.
Under Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty Member States of destination cannot forbid the sale on their territories of products which are lawfully marketed in another Member State and which are not subject to Community harmonisation, unless the technical restrictions laid down by the Member State of destination are justified on the grounds described in Article 30 of the EC Treaty, or on the basis of overriding requirements of general public importance recognised by the Court of Justice's case law, and are proportionate.
Gre za načelo vzajemnega priznavanja.
This is the so-called 'principle of mutual recognition'.