natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(19) Za določitev , katera podjetja morajo prispevati v kompenzacijski sklad, države članice upoštevajo , ali je mogoče storitve, ki jih nudijo takšna podjetja, z vidika uporabnika šteti za nadomestljive z univerzalnimi storitvami, ob istočasnem upoštevanju značilnosti storitev, vključno z dodano vrednostjo, ter njihovo predvideno uporabo.
(19) In order to determine which undertakings may be required to contribute to a compensation fund , Member States should consider whether the services provided by such undertakings may, from a user's perspective, be regarded as substitutable to universal services, taking into account the characteristics of the services, including added value features, and their intended use.
Da bi se storitve štele za nadomestljive, ni nujno, da vsebujejo vse značilnosti univerzalne storitve, kot sta na primer dnevna dostava ali popolna nacionalna pokritost.
In order to be considered substitutable, the services do not necessarily have to cover all the features of the universal service, such as daily delivery or complete national coverage.
Da bi se pri določanju prispevka teh podjetij za stroške zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve v državi članici upoštevalo načelo sorazmernosti, morajo države članice uporabiti pregledna in nediskriminacijska merila, kot je na primer delež teh podjetij pri dejavnostih, ki spadajo na področje univerzalne storitve v tej državi članici.
In order to comply with the proportionality principle when determining the contribution to the costs of the provision of universal service in a Member State asked from these undertakings, Member States should use transparent and non discriminatory criteria such as the share of these undertakings in the activities falling within the scope of the universal service in this Member State .
(19) Podjetja, ki zagotavljajo storitve, nadomestljive z univerzalno storitvijo, lahko prispevajo k financiranju univerzalne storitve, pri kateri je predviden kompenzacijski sklad.
(19) Undertakings offering services which are substitutable for the universal service are required to contribute to the financing of the universal service in cases where provision is made for a compensation fund .
Za določitev takih podjetij bi morale države članice upoštevati , ali je mogoče storitve, ki jih nudijo takšna podjetja, z vidika uporabnika šteti za nadomestljive z univerzalnimi storitvami, ob istočasnem upoštevanju značilnosti storitev, vključno z dodano vrednostjo, ter njihovo predvideno uporabo.
In order to determine which undertakings are concerned , Member States should consider whether the services provided by such undertakings may, from a user's perspective, be regarded as substitutable to universal services, taking into account the characteristics of the services, including added value features, and their intended use.
Da bi se storitve štele za nadomestljive, ni nujno, da vsebujejo vse značilnosti univerzalne storitve, kot sta na primer dnevna dostava ali popolna nacionalna pokritost , če vsebujejo vsaj eno od značilnosti storitev, ki se izvajajo v okviru univerzalne storitve .
In order to be considered substitutable, the services do not necessarily have to cover all the features of the universal service, such as daily delivery or complete national coverage , provided that they cover at least one of the features of the services provided under the universal service .
Da bi se pri določanju prispevka teh podjetij za stroške zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve v državi članici upoštevalo načelo sorazmernosti, morajo države članice uporabiti pregledna in nediskriminacijska merila.
In order to comply with the proportionality principle when determining the contribution to the costs of the provision of universal service in a Member State requested from these undertakings, Member States should use transparent and non discriminatory criteria.
(20) Načela preglednosti, nediskriminatornosti in sorazmernosti iz Direktive 97/67/ES se še naprej uporabljajo pri vseh mehanizmih financiranja in vse odločitve na tem področju morajo temeljiti na preglednih, nepristranskih in preverljivih merilih.
(20) The principles of transparency, non-discrimination and proportionality contained in Directive 97/67/EC must continue to be applied to any financing mechanism and any decision in this area be based on transparent, objective and verifiable criteria.
Zlasti neto stroške univerzalne storitve je treba izračunati, z odgovornostjo nacionalnega regulativnega organa, kot razliko med neto stroški za imenovano podjetje, ki posluje z obveznostmi univerzalne storitve in ki ne posluje z obveznostmi univerzalne storitve.
In particular, the net cost of universal service is to be calculated, under the responsibility of the national regulatory authority, as the difference between the net costs for a designated undertaking operating with the universal service obligations and operating without the universal service obligations.
Izračun mora upoštevati vse druge pomembne elemente, vključno z vsemi tržnimi koristmi, ki jih ima podjetje, imenovano za zagotavljanje univerzalne storitve, upravičenostjo do primernega dobička in spodbudami za stroškovno učinkovitost.
The calculation shall take into account all other relevant elements, including any market benefits which accrue to an undertaking designated to provide universal service, the entitlement to a reasonable profit and incentives for cost efficiency.
(20) Načela preglednosti, nediskriminatornosti in sorazmernosti iz Direktive 97/67/ES se še naprej uporabljajo pri vseh mehanizmih financiranja in vse odločitve na tem področju morajo temeljiti na preglednih, nepristranskih in preverljivih merilih.
(20) The principles of transparency, non-discrimination and proportionality contained in Directive 97/67/EC must continue to be applied to any financing mechanism and any decision in this area must be based on transparent, objective and verifiable criteria.
Komisija bi morala podati podrobne smernice o tem, kako naj se izračunavajo neto stroški univerzalne storitve, da se prepreči pravna negotovost in zagotovijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji.
In order to avoid legal uncertainty and to ensure a level playing field, the Commission should issue detailed guidance as to how the net cost of universal service is to be calculated.
Potrebna so jasnejša in enotnejša pravila glede izračunavanja stroškov univerzalne storitve.
There is a need for clearer and more uniform rules on the calculation of the cost of universal service.
(20a) Primerno je, da se državam članicam, ki so se reformi poštnih storitev pridružile v kasnejši fazi, ali državam članicam s posebej težavno topografijo, zlasti tistim s številnimi otoki, zagotovi možnost dodatnega prehodnega obdobja dveh let za odpravo obstoječih in posebnih pravic in da se Komisijo o tem obvesti.
(20a) It is appropriate to provide those Member States that have joined the postal reform process at a late stage, or Member States with a particularly difficult topography, especially those with a huge number of islands, with the possibility of an additional transitory period of two years for the removal of existing and special rights, subject to notification to the Commission.
Zaradi tega izjemnega obdobja je tudi primerno, da se državam članicam, ki so v celoti odprle svoje trge, znotraj omejenega časovnega okvira in za omejeno število storitev dovoli, da monopolnim podjetjem, ki delujejo v drugi državi članici, zavrnejo dovoljenje za delovanje na svojem ozemlju.
Taking into account this exceptional period, it is also appropriate, within a limited time frame and for a limited number of services, to allow those Member States that have completely opened up their markets to refuse monopolies operating in another Member State authorisation to operate in their own territory.
(21) Državam članicam je treba dovoliti uporabo dovoljenj in individualnih licenc, če je to upravičeno in sorazmerno z zastavljenim ciljem.
(21) Member States should be allowed to use authorisation and individual licences whenever justified and proportionate to the objective pursued.
Vendar pa je, kot je bilo poudarjeno v Poročilu o uporabi Direktive 97/67/ES, potrebno nadaljnje usklajevanje pogojev, ki se lahko uvedejo za zmanjševanje neupravičenih ovir za zagotavljanje storitev na notranjem trgu.
However, as highlighted by the third Report on the Application of Directive 97/67/EC, further harmonisation of the conditions that may be introduced appears necessary to reduce unjustified barriers to the provision of services in the internal market.
V tem kontekstu lahko države članice na primer dovolijo podjetjem, da izberejo med obveznostjo po zagotavljanju storitve ali finančnim prispevkom za stroške te storitve, ki jo zagotavlja drugo podjetje, vendar ne smejo več nalagati sočasne zahteve po prispevanju k mehanizmu delitve in zahteve po obveznosti univerzalne storitve ali kakovosti, ki obe služita istemu namenu.
In this context, Member States may for example allow undertakings to choose between the obligation to provide a service or to contribute financially to the costs of this service provided by another undertaking, but should no longer be allowed to impose the concurrent requirement to contribute to a sharing mechanism and the imposition of universal service or quality obligations that are intended to serve the same purpose.
Treba je tudi pojasniti, da nekatere določbe o dovoljenjih in izdajanju licenc ne veljajo za imenovane izvajalce univerzalne storitve.
It is also appropriate to clarify that some of the provisions on authorisation and licensing should not apply to designated universal service providers.
V tem kontekstu lahko države članice na primer dovolijo podjetjem, ki nudijo storitve v okviru univerzalne storitve, ali storitve, ki lahko takšne storitve nadomestijo, da izberejo med obveznostjo po zagotavljanju storitve ali finančnim prispevkom za stroške te storitve, ki jo zagotavlja drugo podjetje , vendar ne smejo več nalagati sočasne zahteve po prispevanju k mehanizmu delitve in zahteve po obveznosti univerzalne storitve ali kakovosti, ki obe služita istemu namenu.
In this context, Member States may for example allow undertakings that provide services within the scope of the universal service or services considered to be possible substitutes, to choose between the obligation to provide a service or to contribute financially to the costs of this service provided by another undertaking, but should no longer be allowed to impose the concurrent requirement to contribute to a sharing mechanism and the imposition of universal service or quality obligations that are intended to serve the same purpose.
(22) V okolju, kjer storitve na področju univerzalne storitve izvaja več poštnih podjetij, je primerno zahtevati, da vse države članice z namenom spodbujanja učinkovite konkurence ocenijo, ali je nekatere elemente poštne infrastrukture ali določene storitve, ki jih na splošno zagotavljajo izvajalci univerzalne storitve, treba narediti dostopne drugim operaterjem, ki nudijo podobne storitve, in/ali varujejo uporabnike in potrošnike z zagotavljanjem splošne kakovosti poštne storitve.
(22) In an environment where several postal undertakings provide services within the universal service area, it is appropriate to require all Member States to assess whether some elements of the postal infrastructure or certain services generally provided by universal service providers should be made accessible to other operators providing similar services, in order to promote effective competition, and/or protect users and consumers by ensuring the overall quality of the postal service.
Ker se pravni položaj in položaj na trgu teh elementov ali storitev v državah članicah razlikujeta, je primerno zahtevati od držav članic le, da sprejmejo odločitev na podlagi prejetih informacij o potrebi, obsegu in izbiri regulativnih instrumentov, vključno z delitvijo stroškov, čer je to primerno.
As the legal and market situation of these elements or services is different in Member States it is appropriate to only require Member States to adopt an informed decision on the need, extent and choice of the regulatory instrument, including where appropriate on cost sharing.
Ta določba ne posega v pravico držav članic, da sprejmejo ukrepe za zagotovitev dostopa do javnega poštnega omrežja ob upoštevanju načel preglednosti in nediskriminatornosti.
This provision is without prejudice to the right of Member States to adopt measures to ensure access to the public postal network under conditions of transparency and non discrimination.
Kadar obstaja več izvajalcev univerzalne storitve z regionalnim poštnim omrežjem, morajo države članice tudi oceniti in po potrebi zagotoviti njihovo medsebojno usklajeno delovanje, da bi preprečile ovire za hiter prenos poštnih pošiljk.
Where several universal service providers with regional postal networks exist, Member States should also assess and, where necessary, ensure their inter-operability in order to prevent impediments to the prompt transport of postal items .
V skladu s členom 4 lahko države članice za različne dele svojega ozemlja imenujejo različne izvajalce univerzalne storitve.
Under Article 4 the Member States can designate different universal service providers for different parts of their territory.
Če delovanje različnih poštnih omrežij v zadevni državi članici ni dovolj usklajeno, je v celoti ovirano zanesljivo izvajanje univerzalne storitve v zadevni državi članici.
A lack of interoperability between these different postal networks could impede the reliable overall provision of universal services in the Member State concerned.
Kadar se izvajalci univerzalne storitve, ki upravljajo različna omrežja, ne morejo zediniti glede sodelovanja, morajo države članice sprejeti ustrezne predpise.
So if the universal service providers operating the different networks do not agree on interoperability the Member States will have to take the necessary measures.
(23) Glede na pomembnost poštnih storitev za slepe in slabovidne osebe je treba zagotoviti, da postopek odpiranja trga ne bo okrnil stalne ponudbe nekaterih brezplačnih storitev za slepe in slabovidne osebe, ki so jo uvedle države članice v skladu z veljavnimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi .
(23) Given the importance of postal services for blind and partially sighted persons, it is appropriate to confirm that the process of market opening should not curtail the continuing supply of certain free services for blind and partially sighted persons introduced by the Member States in accordance with applicable international obligations.
(23) Glede na pomembnost poštnih storitev za slepe in slabovidne osebe je treba zagotoviti, da na konkurenčnem in liberaliziranem trgu obstaja obveznost brezplačnih storitev za slepe in slabovidne osebe, ki so jo uvedle države.
(23) Given the importance of postal services for blind and partially sighted persons, it is appropriate to confirm that in a competitive and liberalised market there should be an obligation to supply free services for blind and partially sighted persons introduced by the Member States.
Da bodo slepi in slabovidni tudi v prihodnje uživali brezplačne poštne storitve na popolno izoblikovanem enotnem poštnem trgu, je treba v popravljeni direktivi to jasno zapisati.
There is a need for clear wording in the revised Directive in order to achieve the continuing provision of the free postal service for blind and partially sighted people in a fully operational single postal market.
Storitev bi morala biti obvezna v vsej EU in ne odvisna le od držav članic.
Such a service should be a cross-border obligation and should not be left solely to Member States.
(24) V popolnoma konkurenčnem okolju je pomembno, tako za finančno ravnovesje univerzalne storitve kot tudi za omejevanje izkrivljanja trga, da se od načela, da cene odražajo običajne tržne pogoje in stroške, odstopa samo z namenom zaščite javnih interesov .
(24) In a fully competitive environment, it is important , both for the financial equilibrium of the universal service as well as for limiting market distortions, that the principle that prices reflect normal commercial conditions and costs is only departed from in order to protect public interests .
Ta cilj se doseže z nadaljnjim omogočanjem državam članicam, da ohranijo enotne tarife za pošto s tarifo za en kos, storitev, ki jo potrošniki ter majhna in srednje velika podjetja uporabljajo najpogosteje.
This objective is achieved by continuing to allow Member States to maintain uniform tariffs for single piece tariff mail, the service most frequently used by consumers and small and mediumsize enterprises.
Posamezne države članice lahko ohranijo enotne tarife tudi za nekatere druge poštne pošiljke z namenom zaščite pravic splošnega javnega pomena, kot je npr. dostop do kulturne, regionalne in socialne kohezije.
Individual Member States may also maintain uniform tariffs for some other mail items to protect general public interest reasons, such as access to culture, regional and social cohesion.
(24) V vse bolj konkurenčnem okolju je pomembno, da imajo izvajalci univerzalne storitve možnost določanja prilagodljivih tarif, saj je to potrebno za zajamčeno in finančno sprejemljivo zagotavljanje univerzalne storitve .
(24) In a highly competitive environment, it is important to ensure that universal service providers are given the pricing flexibility necessary to guarantee a financially viable universal service provision.
Zato je pomembno zagotoviti, da države članice tarife, ki odstopajo od načela, da cene odražajo običajno tržno povpraševanje in stroške, uvedejo samo v omejenih primerih .
It is, therefore, important to ensure, that Member States only impose tariffs departing from the principle that prices reflect normal commercial demand and costs in limited cases .
Ta cilj se doseže z nadaljnjim omogočanjem državam članicam, da ohranijo enotne tarife za pošto s tarifo za en kos, storitev, ki jo potrošniki ter majhna in srednje velika podjetja uporabljajo najpogosteje.
This objective is achieved by continuing to allow Member States to maintain uniform tariffs for single piece tariff mail, the service most frequently used by consumers and small and medium-sized enterprises.
Ne glede na načelo stroškovne naravnanosti cen lahko izvajalci univerzalne storitve še vedno uporabijo enotne tarife za storitve, ki jih nudijo v okviru univerzalne storitve.
The principle of cost-oriented pricing should not prevent operators responsible for providing the universal service from applying uniform tariffs for services provided as part of that universal service.
Treba je oceniti posledice postopne liberalizacije na tarifna načela, ki veljajo za izvajalce univerzalne storitve, zato mora iti z roko v roki s potrebno prilagodljivostjo, ki bo izvajalcem univerzalne storitve pomagala k temu, da bo bolj konkurenčen in se bo lažje odzival na povpraševanje trga.
It is appropriate to assess the implications for the tariff principles applicable to universal service providers of choosing progressive liberalisation because that liberalisation must be accompanied by the necessary flexibility for the universal service provider to cope with competition and by the possibility to adjust to market demand.
UVODNA IZJAVA 24 A (novo)
RECITAL 24 A (new)
(24a) Za storitve, ki jih izvajalci univerzalne storitve zagotavljajo za podjetja, pošiljatelje masovne pošte ali združevalce pošte različnih strank morajo veljati bolj prilagodljivi tarifni pogoji.
(24a) It is necessary for the provision, by universal service providers of services for businesses, bulk mailers and consolidators of mail from different customers, to be subject to more flexible tariff conditions.
Tarifna načela, ki se uporabljajo za izvajalce univerzalne storitve, je nujno treba prilagoditi vse večji liberalizaciji sektorja.
It is necessary to adapt the tariff principles applicable to universal service provider to the growing liberalisation of the sector.
Postopna liberalizacija mora potekati vzporedno z nujno prilagodljivostjo tarif za izvajalca univerzalne storitve, da se lahko sooči s konkurenco in prilagodi potrebam trga.
This progressive liberalisation must go hand in hand with the necessary tariff flexibility for the universal service provider, so that it can face competition and adapt to market needs.
(25) Zaradi nacionalnih posebnosti, vključenih v ureditev pogojev, pod katerimi mora delovati trenutni izvajalec univerzalnih storitev v popolnoma konkurenčnem okolju, je treba državam članicam omogočiti svobodo pri odločanju, kako najbolje spremljati navzkrižne subvencije.
(25) In view of the national specificities involved in the regulation of the conditions in which the incumbent universal service provider must operate in a fully competitive environment it is appropriate to leave Member States the freedom to decide how best to monitor cross-subsidies.
Če bi spremljanje navzkrižnih subvencij prepustili državam članicam, bi bilo to v nasprotju s Pogodbo ES, po kateri je za to pristojna Komisija.
Leaving the Member States to monitor cross-subsidies would run counter to the system introduced by the EC Treaty, which makes this task a Commission responsibility.
(26) Zaradi prehoda na popolnoma konkurenčen trg je primerno še naprej zahtevati, da države članice ohranijo obveznost izvajalca(-ev) univerzalnih storitev glede vodenja ločenega in preglednega računovodstva, ob upoštevanju potrebnih prilagoditev.
(26) In view of the transition towards a fully competitive market, it is appropriate to continue to require Member States to maintain the obligation on universal service providers of keeping separate and transparent accounts, subject to the necessary adaptations.
Ta obveznost bo nacionalnim regulativnim organom, organom, pristojnim za konkurenco, in Komisiji zagotovila potrebne informacije za sprejem odločitev, povezanih z univerzalno storitvijo, in za spremljanje poštenih tržnih pogojev, dokler konkurenca ne postane učinkovita.
This obligation should provide national regulatory authorities, competition authorities and the Commission with the information necessary to adopt decisions related to the universal service and to monitor fair market conditions until competition becomes effective.
Sodelovanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi pri nadaljnjem razvoju standardov in smernic na tem področju bo prispevalo k usklajeni uporabi teh pravil.
Cooperation between national regulatory authorities in continuing to develop benchmarks and guidelines in this area, should contribute to the harmonised application of these rules.
(26) Zaradi prehoda na popolnoma konkurenčen trg in da bi zagotovili, da navzkrižne subvencije od univerzalnih storitev do ne-univerzalnih storitev ne bodo imele negativnih posledic na konkurenčno prednost slednjih, je primerno še naprej zahtevati, da države članice ohranijo obveznost izvajalca(-ev) univerzalnih storitev glede vodenja ločenega in preglednega računovodstva, ob upoštevanju potrebnih prilagoditev.
(26) In view of the transition towards a fully competitive market and in order to ensure that cross-subsidies from universal services to non-universal services do not adversely affect the competitive advantage of the latter , it is appropriate to continue to require Member States to maintain the obligation on universal service providers of keeping separate and transparent accounts, subject to the necessary adaptations.
Ločeno stroškovno računovodstvo (člen 14) je bistveno za delovanje trga.
Keeping separate accounts (Article 14) is vitally important for operation of the market.
Treba je zagotoviti ustrezno pripisovanje skupnih stroškov, zato da se ne bi zaradi stroškov, ki so v preveliki meri pripisani univerzalni storitvi, stroški tistih storitev, ki ne sodijo k univerzalni storitvi, umetno ohranjali na nizki ravni.
There is a need to ensure that shared costs are properly allocated to their causes, so that the costs of services that do not belong to the universal service are not artificially held down by undue allocation to the universal service.