natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Do sedaj je pomanjkljiva usklajenost sprememb povzročala velike zamude in neučinkovitost z gospodarskega vidika in z vidika potreb v sektorju veterinarske medicine.
So far, the lack of harmonisation with regards to variations has caused great delays and inefficiency, from both an economic point of view and also as regards the needs of the veterinary medicinal sector.
Prav tako ni logično usklajevanje na vsaki stopnji življenjskega cikla proizvoda, razen ko se ga spreminja.
It is also illogical to have harmonisation for every stage in the lifecycle of a product except when it comes to changes brought to it.
Vendar je pri implicitnih stroških za države članice in pri ustreznem časovnem razporedu za doseganje usklajenosti v praksi potrebna previdnost.
Nevertheless, there is a need to be careful about the implied costs for the Member States and a proper schedule for achieving harmonisation in practice.
Držav članic ni mogoče pozvati, naj spremenijo svoje notranje predpise, da bi se prilagodile tej direktivi in nadaljnjim spremembam, sprejetim s postopkom komitologije, v obdobju, ki je prekratko in povzroča previsoke stroške.
Member States cannot be called on to change their internal regulations in order to comply with the present directive and further changes adopted through comitology in a period of time that is too short and that implies too high costs.
V skladu z izvedeno oceno učinka, javnim posvetovanjem in dokumenti o stališču, ki so jih predstavile regulativne agencije držav članic, se predlogi pripravljavke mnenja osredotočajo na več točk.
In accordance with the Impact Assessment conducted, the public consultation and the position papers submitted by regulatory agencies of the Member States, proposals by the draftswoman focus on several points.
Prvič, pripraviti moramo časovni razpored za uskladitev, ki bo ustrezal razlikam v pripravljenosti med državami članicami.
Firstly, we need to achieve a schedule for harmonisation that corresponds to variations in preparedness between Member States.
Države članice so v dokumentih pozivale k različnim časovnim okvirjem, jasno pa je, da večjemu številu držav članic najbolj ustreza dveletno obdobje za prenos.
In the papers submitted, there have been different calls for different schedules and it is apparent that a 2-year period for transposition is preferred by a significant number of Member States.
Treba jih je upoštevati, saj je to nujno za dejansko izvajanje usklajevanja v praksi.
We need to take these into account as it is essential to the real implementation of harmonisation into practice.
Drugič, še bolj moramo poudariti, da mora Parlament nadzirati zakonodajo, ki se sprejema s postopkom komitologije.
Secondly, we need to further stress the need for Parliament supervision of legislation adopted under comitology.
Moramo imeti možnost nadzorovati zakonodajni proces z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom.
We need to be able to supervise the legislative process through the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
In tretjič, pripravljavka mnenja je prepričana, da bi Parlament moral pozvati k poenostavitvi uredb o spremembah.
Thirdly, the draftswoman believes Parliament should call for the simplification of the Variations Regulations.
Več sodelujočih v javnem posvetovanju je sprožilo to vprašanje in zagotoviti moramo, da sedaj veljavne uredbe o spremembah ne bodo povzročile nepotrebne birokracije za države članice, podjetja in državljane.
This issue was raised by several participants in the public consultation and we need to ensure that the Variations Regulations we have in place at the moment do not create unnecessary bureaucracy for the Member States, companies and the citizens.
(6a) Veljavne upravne postopke, določene v Uredbi (ES) št. 1084/2003 in Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1085/2003 z dne 3. junija 2003 o pregledu sprememb dovoljenja za promet z zdravili za uporabo v humani medicini in zdravili za uporabo v veterinarski medicini, ki spadajo v področje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2309/93 1 (uredbi o spremembah), je treba ponovno pregledati in se zlasti osredotočiti na njihovo poenostavitev.
(6a) It is necessary to revisit current administrative procedures as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1084/2003 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1085/2003 of 3 June 2003 concerning the examination of variations to the terms of a marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products falling within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93 1 (Variations Regulations), with a focus, in particular, on simplifying administrative procedures.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje [ 24 mesecev po začetku veljavnosti].
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [ 24 months after entry into force] at the latest.
Petja Stavreva
Petya Stavreva
Vincenzo Aita, Sergio Berlato, Bernadette Bourzai, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Giovanna Corda, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Konstantin Dumitru, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Esther Herranz García, Lily Jacobs, Elisabeth Jeggle, Heinz Kindermann, Véronique Mathieu, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, James Nicholson, María Isabel Salinas García, Petja Stavreva, Dimiter Stojanov, László Tőkés, Witold Tomczak, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Janusz Wojciechowski
Vincenzo Aita, Sergio Berlato, Bernadette Bourzai, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Giovanna Corda, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Constantin Dumitriu, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Esther Herranz García, Lily Jacobs, Elisabeth Jeggle, Heinz Kindermann, Véronique Mathieu, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, James Nicholson, María Isabel Salinas García, Petya Stavreva, Dimitar Stoyanov, László Tőkés, Witold Tomczak, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Janusz Wojciechowski
o vključitvi novega člena 202a o te m, kako Parlament uporablja simbole Unije, v poslovnik Parlamenta
on insertion of a new Rule 202a on the use by Parliament of the symbols of the Union
PE 398.505v02-00
PE 398.505v04-00
o vključitvi novega člena 202a o tem, kako Parlament uporablja simbole Unije, v poslovnik Parlamenta
on insertion in Parliament's Rules of Procedure of a new Rule 202a on the use by Parliament of the symbols of the Union
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. julija 2007 o sklicu medvladne konference
– having regard to its resolution of 11 July 2007 on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference
– ob upoštevanju pisma svojega predsednika z dne 12. septembra 2007,
– having regard to the letter from its President of 12 September 2007,
– ob upoštevanju pomena simbolov za ponovno povezovanje državljanov z Evropsko unijo in za oblikovanje evropske identitete, ki dopolnjuje nacionalne identitete držav članic,
– having regard to the importance of symbols for reconnecting the citizens with the European Union and for building a European identity which is complementary to the national identities of the Member States,
– ob upoštevanju dejstva, da simbole že več kot 30 let uporabljajo vse evropske institucije, uradno pa jih je sprejel Evropski svet leta 1985
– having regard to the fact that the symbols have been in use for over 30 years by all European Institutions and were formally adopted by the European Council in 1985
Evropski svet v Milanu, 28. in 29. junij leta 1985. ,
Milan European Council of 28 and 29 June 1985. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0347/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0347/2008 ),
Naslov XIII, druge določbe, člen 202 (a) (novo)
Title XIII - Miscellaneous Provisions - Rule 202 a (new)
Člen 202a
Rule 202a
Parlament prizna in prevzame naslednje simbole Unije:
Parliament shall recognise and espouse the following symbols of the Union :
– zastavo, na kateri je upodobljen krog z dvanajstimi zlatimi zvezdami na modri podlagi;
– the flag showing a circle of twelve golden stars on a blue background;
– himno, ki izvira iz Ode radosti iz Devete simfonije Ludwiga van Beethovna;
– the anthem based on the ‘Ode to Joy’ from the Ninth Symphony by Ludwig van Beethoven;
– geslo „Združena v raznolikosti“.
– the motto 'United in diversity'.
Himno se predvaja ob začetku vsake ustanovne seje in ob drugih slovesnih sejah, zlas t i v dobrodošlico voditeljem držav in vlad ali v pozdrav novim poslancem po širitvah.
The anthem shall be performed at the opening of each constitutive session and at other solemn sittings, notably to welcome heads of State or government or to greet new Members following enlargements.
Simboli v družbenem in političnem komunikacijskem procesu
Symbols in the social and political communication process
Simboli so pomembni sestavni deli vsakega komunikacijskega procesa, zlasti v povezavi s procesom, v katerem javnost prepoznava družbene skupine ali organizacije, vključno s političnimi telesi, in se z njimi identificira.
Symbols are vital elements of any communication process, particularly in relation to the process of the public's identification of or with any social grouping or organisation, including political bodies.
Simboli so vsekakor lahko odločilen dejavnik za čustveno navezanost javnosti na te organizacije.
Indeed, symbols may be a decisive element for the public's emotional attachment to these organisations.
Zastave, grbi, himne, slogani, barve in druge vrste simbolov so torej ključnega pomena za to, da javnost prizna kakršno koli človeško organizacijo, bodisi politično, etnično, kulturno, športno itd., in pomembno vplivajo na identifikacijo javnosti s temi organizacijami.
Flags, emblems, anthems, slogans, colours and other types of symbol are therefore essential in ensuring that any type of human organisation, whether political, ethnic, cultural, sporting, etc., is recognised by the public, and they play a crucial role in the public's identification with these organisations.
Simboli nosijo čustveno podobo temeljnih vrednot organizacij, ki jih predstavljajo, nastopajo v vlogi razlagalcev abstraktnih idej, omogočajo lažjo komunikacijo in sodelovanje ter pomagajo pri približevanju organizacij, ki jih simbolizirajo, državljanom in tako prispevajo k njihovi legitimnosti.
Symbols convey an emotional image of the underlying values of the organisations they represent, they play a part in making abstract ideas intelligible, they facilitate communication and participation and they help to bring the organisations that they symbolise closer to the citizens, thereby contributing to their legitimacy.
Evropska zastava
The European flag
Zastava Evropske unije je temno modra zastava s krogom 12 petokrakih zlatih zvezd, ki je od leta 1955 simbol Sveta Evrope, prve organizacije za politično sodelovanje, ustanovljene v Evropi po svetovni vojni.
The European Union flag is the dark blue flag with a circle of 12 five-pointed golden stars which has been the symbol of the Council of Europe, the first organisation for political cooperation set up in Europe after the world war, since 1955.
Za preprečitev razpršenosti na različne simbole, ki bi lahko zmedla državljane in jim jih oddaljila namesto približala, se je Evropski svet v Milanu leta 1985
In order to avoid a scattering of different symbols, which might confuse and alienate citizens instead of bringing them closer, the 1985 Milan European Council
Evropski svet v Milanu junija 1985 je zastavo, himno in dan Evrope sprejel na pobudo iz Adonninovega poročila ad hoc odbora za Evropo narodov, kar je bilo nato aprila 1986 dokončno potrjeno s sklepom Sveta.
The flag, the anthem and Europe day were adopted by the Milan European Council of June 1985, acting on the suggestion contained in the Adonnino report of the ad hoc committee on a Peoples' Europe, this decision being subsequently formalised by a Council decision of April 1986.
Evropska zastava je od 29. maja 1986 skupaj z zastavami takratnih 12 držav članic Evropskih skupnosti izobešena v stavbah evropskih institucij. odločil, da bo sledil temu zgledu in to zastavo, ki je takrat obstajala že 30 let, določil za zastavo takratne Evropske skupnosti.
Since 29 May 1986 the European flag has been flying at the buildings of the European institutions alongside the national flags of the then 12 Member States of the European Communities. decided to follow this example and make this flag, which had by then been in existence for almost 30 years, the flag of what was then the European Community.
Zastava naj bi predstavljala popolnost, komplementarnost in solidarnost ter tako simbolizirala enotnost Evrope.
The flag was intended to represent perfection, complementarity and solidarity, thus symbolising Europe's unity.
Evropski državljani so od leta 1986 navajeni, da temno modro zastavo z 12 zlatimi zvezdami vidijo in prepoznavajo kot zastavo svoje Evropske unije.
Since 1986, European citizens have become used to seeing and identifying the dark blue flag with 12 golden stars as the flag of their European Union.
Zastava se od takrat različno, a čedalje bolj uspešno uporablja v evropskih, državnih, regionalnih in lokalnih javnih stavbah, javnih institucijah in na prireditvah (v nekaterih državah članicah je skupaj z državno zastavo razvita celo v parlamentu) kot simbol, ki predstavlja programe in ukrepe Skupnosti (npr. na notranjih mejah med državami članicami, kjer simbolizira odpravo nadzora na notranjih mejah, ali na informacijah za javnost o programih javnih del, ki jih sofinancira Unija, itd.).
Since then, the flag has been used, with varying but growing degrees of success, at both European and national, regional and local public buildings, at public institutions and ceremonies (in some Member States it is even unfurled alongside the national flag in the national parliaments), as a symbol identifying Community programmes and actions (for example, at internal borders between Member States, symbolising the abolition of controls at internal borders, or on information for the public on public works programmes co-financed by the Union, etc.).
Modra zastava z 12 zlatimi zvezdami je, morda presenetljivo, postala prepoznavna tudi preko zunanjih meja Unije in je simbol, ki za prebivalstvo, ki so ga prizadele humanitarne krize ali naravne katastrofe, predstavlja območje miru, varnosti in solidarnosti.
Perhaps surprisingly, the blue flag with the 12 golden stars has also become known beyond the Union's external borders, and it is a symbol which populations facing humanitarian crises or natural disasters have come to identify with a haven of peace, safety and solidarity.
Evropska himna
The European anthem
Zopet je bil Svet Evrope tisti, ki je leta 1972 za svojo uradno himno prvi sprejel Odo radosti iz Devete simfonije Ludwiga van Beethovna, ki je bila uglasbena leta 1823 na podlagi pesmi z istim naslovom Friedricha von Schillerja iz leta 1785.
It was also the Council of Europe, in 1972, which was the first to adopt as its official anthem the 'Ode to Joy' from the Ninth Symphony by Ludwig van Beethoven, composed in 1823 and based on the poem with the same title written by Friedrich von Schiller in 1785.
Težko bi bilo najti tako zelo znano glasbo in poezijo, ki bi bolje ponazarjala idejo evropskega združevanja kot ta oda „poosebljeni enotnosti človeške vrste“, privzdignjena z radostno in dostojanstveno glasbo skladatelja, ki je eden izmed največjih simbolov evropske ustvarjalnosti.
It would be hard to find such a well-known piece of music and poetry that would better symbolise the idea of European integration than this ode 'to the unity of the human species transformed into the subject', heightened by the exultant and sublime music of a composer who is one of the best symbols of European genius.
Evropske institucije so zato ravnale prav, ko so po zgledu Sveta Evrope „Odo radosti“ izbrale za himno Evropske unije.
The European institutions thus did well to follow the example of the Council of Europe and make the 'Ode to Joy' the anthem of the European Union.
Dan Evrope
Europe D ay
Prav tako so evropske institucije so hitro zaznale potrebo po dnevu za počastitev spomina na evropsko združevanje.
The European institutions were also quick to perceive the need for a day to commemorate European integration.
Na splošno imajo državni in civilni prazniki dvojno funkcijo, in sicer da obujajo spomin na identiteto ali vrednoto, ki se je takrat spominjamo, hkrati pa ustvarjajo in obnavljajo to isto identiteto ali vrednoto, ki tako dobi ponovno potrditev za prihodnost.
National and civic public holidays generally have a dual function of evoking an identity or value that is being remembered, but also of producing and renewing that same identity or value that is then reaffirmed for the future.
Institucije Skupnosti so 9. maj, dan Schumanove deklaracije, izbrale za svoj uradni praznik leta 1962, vendar velja le za njihovo osebje.
9 May, the day of the Schuman Declaration, was chosen by the Community institutions as their official holiday in 1962, but it applies only to their staff.
Svet Evrope je leta 1964 za dan Evrope izbral 5. maj, dan njegove ustanovitve leta 1949, vendar to nikoli ni imelo pravega evropskega učinka.
For its part, in 1964 the Council of Europe chose 5 May, the date on which it was set up in 1949, as Europe Day, but it never had any genuine European impact.
Kasneje se je Evropski svet v Milanu odločil, da bo sledil priporočilom iz Adonninovega poročila in priredil javno počastitev spomina na 9. maj, dan, ki verjetno najbolje simbolizira trenutek, ko se je začel celoten proces evropskega združevanja.
Later, the Milan European Council decided to follow the recommendations of the Adonnino report and publicly commemorate 9 May, the date which perhaps best symbolises the moment when the whole process of European integration was launched.
9. maj iz institucij postopno prehaja v javno življenje s pomočjo organizacije predstav, razstav in dogodkov, kot je dan odprtih vrat, ko lahko državljani obiščejo evropske institucije in njihove pisarne v državah članicah, dobijo informacijsko in razvedrilno gradivo itd., in tako korak za korakom postaja praznik evropskih državljanov.
9 May has gradually been emerging out of the institutions and into the outside world through the organisation of shows, exhibitions and events such as open days when citizens can visit the European institutions and their offices in the Member States, acquire material for information and entertainment, etc., so that bit by bit it is becoming a holiday for European citizens.
Njegov globlji pomen pa se bo v čustveni spomin evropskih državljanov zares vtisnil le, če si bodo za to skupaj prizadevale same države članice in dan Evrope priznale za pravi evropski državni praznik.
However, its deeper significance will only truly take root in the emotional memory of European citizens if the Member States themselves join efforts to this end, recognising Europe Day as a real European public holiday.
Jasno je, da je bil skupni valuti, kljub temu, da vanjo še niso vključene vse države članice, zagotovljen uspeh, da postane simbol evropskega projekta, ko je prišla v obtok, in sicer ne le za prebivalstvo držav članic, v katerih je bila uvedena, ampak precej očitno tudi za prebivalstvo tretjih držav, ki je začelo EU povezovati z eurom na enak način kot ZDA z dolarjem.
Evidently, even though it does not yet cover all the Member States, the single currency could not fail to become a symbol of the European project when it came into circulation, not only for the populations of the Member States where it has been introduced, but quite clearly also among the populations of third countries, who are starting to identify the EU with the euro in the same way as they identify the US with the dollar.
Izraz „euro“, ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet v Madridu decembra 1995, je nadomestil izraz „ECU“ iz Maastrichtske pogodbe.
Adopted by the Madrid European Council of December 1995, the term ‘euro’ replaced the ‘ecu’ referred to in the Maastricht Treaty.
Geslo „Združena v raznolikosti“
The motto: ‘United in diversity’
Geslo je najmlajši evropski simbol in izhaja iz pobude Evropskega parlamenta.
The most recent of the European symbols, the motto, stems from an initiative by the European Parliament.
Takratna predsednica Nicole Fontaine je 4. maja 2000 na formalnem zasedanju v bruseljski sejni dvorani razglasila končni rezultat natečaja, v katerem je sodelovalo 2200 šol v 15 državah članicah, ki so takrat sestavljale Evropsko unijo: „enotnost v različnosti“.
On 4 May 2000, at a formal sitting in the Brussels Chamber, the then President Nicole Fontaine announced the final result of a competition in which 2 200 schools in the 15 Member States that then comprised the European Union had taken part: ‘Union in diversity’.
To besedno zvezo je rahlo spremenila Evropska konvencija in tako je nastalo geslo „združena v raznolikosti“, ki jo lahko razumemo kot odlično opredelitev bistva evropskega projekta.
This phrase was altered slightly by the European Convention, becoming ‘United in diversity’, which may be seen as the perfect definition of the essence of the European project.
Evropska ustava in lizbonska pogodba
The European Constitution and the Treaty of Lisbon
Evropski svet v Bruslju junija 2004 je na predlog Evropske konvencije v evropsko ustavo vključil člen (I-8) o simbolih Evropske unije.
On a proposal from the European Convention, the Brussels European Council of June 2004 inserted an article (I-8) on the symbols of the European Union in the European Constitution.
Postopek ratifikacije ustavne pogodbe je, kot vemo, propadel.
As we know, the process of ratifying the Constitutional Treaty collapsed.
Na pogajanjih, ki so se ponovno začela v letu 2007 in so bila namenjena iskanju izhoda iz slepe ulice, v kateri se je znašel postopek ratifikacije po francoski in nizozemski zavrnitvi, se je sedemindvajseterica pod pritiskom nekaterih držav članic odločila, da bo pri spremembah besedila med drugim opustila ustavni vidik in tiste elemente ustave, ki so na videz spominjali na državo.
During the negotiations that recommenced in 2007 with the aim of finding a way out of the impasse that had blocked the process following the French and Dutch ‘noes’, the 27 decided, under pressure from some Member States, to abandon the constitutional perspective and the ‘quasi-state’ elements contained in the Constitution, among other changes to the text.
Simboli Unije so tako postali ena izmed „nenamernih žrtev“ prizadevanj za dosego dogovora, saj niso bili vključeni v novo lizbonsko pogodbo.
The symbols of the Union thus became one of the ‘collateral victims’ of the efforts made to reach an agreement, since they were not included in the new Treaty of Lisbon.
Odziv Evropskega parlamenta
The EP’s reaction
Postavlja se vprašanje, ali bi formalno priznanje zastave, ki jo poznajo vsi Evropejci in ki jo dejansko poznajo prebivalci držav z vsega sveta, ki v njej vidijo zagotovitev zaščite in varnosti v kriznih razmerah; glasbe, ki si jo mrmrajo vsi ljubitelji glasbe; evropskega praznika; valute, ki jo vsak dan že uporabljajo državljani najmanj 13 držav; oziroma tako primernega gesla, kot je „združena v raznolikosti“, dejansko predstavljalo – po zatrjevanju nekaterih vlad – nepremostljivo oviro za ratifikacijo nove pogodbe.
It is questionable whether the formal recognition of a flag which is familiar to all Europeans and that is indeed recognised by the populations of countries throughout the world, who look to it to provide protection and safety in crisis situations, of a piece of music that is hummed by all music lovers, of a European holiday, of a currency that the citizens of at least 13 countries already use every day, or of such an appropriate motto as ‘united in diversity’, could indeed constitute an insurmountable obstacle to the ratification of the new Treaty as some governments claimed.