natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2. poudarja, da je treba v izbirne kazalnike vključiti družbo, socialne partnerje in predstavniške organizacije ter s kombinirano uporabo alternativnih kazalnikov, ki se nanašajo na stanje in trajnost okolja, socialne vključenosti, družbene blaginje in pravičnosti, prispevati k dosegi soglasja, ki je potreben za razvoj skupnega pogleda na socialne cilje;
Stresses the need to engage society, including the social partners and representative organisations, in the selection of indicators and, through the combined use of alternative indicators concerning the condition and sustainability of the natural environment, the levels of social inclusion, social well-being, social integration and fairness, to help build the consensus which is necessary in order to develop a shared view of societal goals;
5. poziva Komisijo, naj na okoljskem in socialnem področju prednostno in nujno uvede kazalnike poleg BDP, saj se BDP povezuje le z gospodarskimi vidiki razvoja, da bi zagotovila celovitejši pregled nad blaginjo in kohezijo;
Calls on the Commission as a matter of priority and urgency to introduce indicators for social and environmental issues in addition to GDP, as GDP only relates to economic aspects of development, with a view to establishing a more comprehensive picture of well-being and cohesion;
7. meni, da bi morala Komisija k običajnim instrumentom za ocenjevanje napredka pri doseganju ciljev strategije EU 2020 dodati alternativne kazalnike;
Considers that the Commission should add alternative indicators to the conventional instruments for assessing progress towards the attainment of the objectives formulated in the EU 2020 Strategy;
11. ugotavlja, da poleg merjenja gospodarskega razvoja in produktivnosti obstajajo tudi drugi kazalniki, ki vplivajo in tolmačijo blaginjo države in ki se do sedaj niso merili;
Notes that, among measuring economic development and productivity, there are other indicators that influence and explain the well-being of a country and that have not been measured (quantified) until now;
13. poudarja, da obstajajo ustrezni kazalniki, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pri urejanju, načrtovanju in vrednotenju socialnih politik upoštevajo meritve in rezultate na podlagi teh kazalnikov v povezavi s podatki o BNP;
Points out that the relevant indicators exist, and calls on the Commission and Member States to take account of measurements and results on the basis of these indicators in conjunction with GDP data for the introduction, planning and evaluation of social policies;
Georges Bach, Raffaele Baldassarre, Jürgen Creutzmann, Tamás Deutsch, Julie Girling, Jelko Kacin, Jan Kozłowski, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Evelyn Regner
Georges Bach, Raffaele Baldassarre, Jürgen Creutzmann, Tamás Deutsch, Julie Girling, Jelko Kacin, Jan Kozłowski, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Evelyn Regner
o BDP in več – Merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja
on GDP and beyond – measuring progress in a changing world
– ob upoštevanju Istanbulske deklaracije OECD o merjenju in spodbujanju napredka družb, sprejete 30. junija 2007,
– having regard to the OECD Istanbul Declaration of 30 June 2007 on ‘Measuring and Fostering the progress of societies’,
– ob upoštevanju integriranih smernic strategije EU 2020 za evropske politike na področju gospodarstva in zaposlovanja, ki jih je Evropska komisija predlagala 27. aprila 2010,
– having regard to the EU 2020 integrated guidelines for European economic and employment policies, proposed by the European Commission on 27 April 2010,
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije o evropskih okoljsko-gospodarskih računih (KOM(2010)132) z dne 9. aprila 2010,
– having regard to the Commission proposal of 9 April 2010 for a regulation on European environmental economic accounts ( COM(2010)0132 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o merjenju gospodarske uspešnosti in družbenega napredka (Stiglitzevo, Senovo in Fitoussijevo poročilo 2008), ki je bilo predstavljeno 14. septembra 2009,
– having regard to the report of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi report 2008), presented on 14 September 2009,
– ob upoštevanju globalne pobude z naslovom Ekonomika ekosistemov in biotska raznovrstnost, ki so jo junija 2007 predlagali voditelji skupine držav G8 in še pet voditeljev drugih držav, ter njenih rezultatov, objavljenih leta 2009 in 2010,
– having regard to the global Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) initiative, endorsed by the G8+5 leaders in June 2007, and to its results, published in 2009 and 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. junija 2008 o trajnostni potrošnji in proizvodnji ter akcijskem načrtu za trajnostno industrijsko politiko ( KOM(2008)0397 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 25 June 2008 on the Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan ( COM(2008)0397 ),
A. ker je treba razpravo o koristih in omejitvah BDP kot sredstva za merjenje in ocenjevanje socialne in gospodarske uspešnosti ter s tem povezanega socialnega napredka pretvoriti v smernice,
A. whereas there is a need to translate into guidelines the debate on the benefits and limitations of GDP as a yardstick for measuring and evaluating the social and economic performance and, by association, social progress,
B. ker BDP ostaja ključni kazalnik za merjenje makroekonomskih dejavnosti, vendar ne upošteva zadosti netržnih vidikov, zato ga je treba nadomestiti z zgoščenim in pripravnim nizom drugih kazalnikov, ki bodo bolj primerni na primer za merjenje socialne vključenosti ali okoljskih ciljev,
B. whereas GDP remains the key indicator for measuring macroeconomic activity, but does not, however, take sufficient account of non-market aspects, and therefore needs to be supplemented with a concise and actionable set of other indicators more suitable for measuring, for example, social inclusion or environmental objectives,
C. ker kazalniki, ki temeljijo na statističnih povprečjih niso zmožni odražati vedno večjih družbenih in ekonomskih razlik,
C. whereas indicators based on statistical averages are not able to reflect increased social and economic disparities,
D. ker je treba razlikovati med sedanjo in prihodnjo blaginjo; pri čemer je treba poudariti, da je nujno obravnavati tudi trajnost, tako z ekonomskega kot okoljskega vidika,
D. whereas a distinction between current and future well-being should be made; whereas it should be underlined that sustainability also needs to be assessed in both its economic and environmental dimensions,
2. pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije z dne 20. avgusta 2009 „BDP in več – Merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja“ (KOM(2009)433 konč.), ki poudarja potrebo po izboljšanju in dopolnitvi BDP; podpira zlasti delo, opravljeno v zvezi z razširitvijo nacionalnih računov na okoljske in socialne dejavnike;
Welcomes the Commission communication of 20 August 2009 on ‘GDP and beyond, measuring progress in a changing world’(COM(2009)433final), which highlights the need to improve and complement GDP; supports in particular the work undertaken on the extension of national accounts to environmental and social factors;
5. opozarja na vodilno pobudo „Evropa, gospodarna z viri“ v strategiji EU 2020 in poudarja, da je treba razviti in uporabiti ustrezne kazalnike za merjenje doseganja njenih ciljev;
Recalls the Flagship Initiative ‘Resource Efficient Europe’ contained in the EU 2020 strategy and points to the need to develop and use appropriate indicators for measuring the attainment of its objectives;
7. poziva k oblikovanju kazalnikov, ki bi se bolj osredotočili na vidik ravni gospodinjstva, odražali dohodek, potrošnjo in bogastvo, kot sredstva za boljši prikaz skrbi državljanov glede materialne blaginje;
Calls for the development of indicators that focus more closely on the household-level perspective, reflecting income, consumption and wealth, as a means to better reflect citizens’ concerns on material well-being;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj BDP ohrani kot odločilni kazalnik za upravičenost v regionalni politiki; se boji, da bi uporaba kakršnih koli drugih kazalnikov ogrozila glavni cilj kohezijske politike v škodo najrevnejših regij in regij z geografsko najbolj neugodnim položajem; vseeno meni, da lahko nacionalne oblasti še naprej uporabljajo socialne, okoljske in z infrastrukturo povezane kazalnike na ustrezni ravni odločanja, ob upoštevanju posebnih okoliščin regij in mest v okviru strategije EU 2020;
Calls on the Commission to continue to retain GDP as the decisive indicator for eligibility in regional policy; fears that the use of any other indicators will jeopardise the main objectives of the cohesion policy to the detriment of the poorest and most geographically disadvantaged regions; believes, however, that national authorities can continue to apply other social, environmental and infrastructure-related indicators at the appropriate level of decision-making, which take into account the specific attributes of regions and cities within the EU 2020 Strategy;
o BDP in več – Merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja
on GDP and beyond – Measuring progress in a changing world
3. opozarja, da so v prilogi II Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu
Points out that Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
4. meni, da je BDP osnovna referenca in učinkovito orodje za merjenje gospodarske rasti regij; zavzema stališče, da njegova resolucija z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o kohezijski in regionalni politiki EU po letu 2013
Considers that GDP is an essential reference and an effective tool for measuring the economic growth of regions; takes the view that its resolution of 7 October 2010 on EU cohesion and regional policy after 2013
5. poudarja, da združeno financiranje za strukturne sklade, Kohezijski sklad, Sklad za razvoj podeželja in Sklad za ribištvo za obdobje 2007–2013 temeljijo izključno na BDP držav članic; opozarja, da je ta koncept v skladu z načelom solidarnosti v Evropski uniji, saj je cilj kohezijske politike zmanjšati vrzeli med ravnmi razvitosti evropskih regij;
Highlights that the combined funding for the Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund, Rural Development Fund and Fisheries Fund for the period 2007-2013 is strictly based on Member States’ GDP; recalls that this concept is in accordance with the principle of solidarity in the European Union, as the aim of cohesion policy is to reduce the gap between the development levels of European regions;
7. opozarja, da so poleg gospodarskih vprašanj tudi zdravje, izobraževanje, varstvo državljanov, prevozna sredstva in infrastruktura, okoljska trajnost, enakost in socialna vključenost v celoti del sestavnega modela evropskega razvoja; dodaja, da bi bilo treba upoštevati kakovost življenja ter gospodarsko, demografsko in okoljsko ranljivost regij, ko gre za oceno projektov, ki pridobijo sredstva iz kohezijske politike, da bi dosegli cilje strategije EU 2020 ter razvili uravnoteženo socialno tržno gospodarstvo;
Recalls that health, education, protection of citizens, means of transport and infrastructure, environmental sustainability, equity and social integration are fully part of the constitutive model of European development, in addition to the economic issues; adds that the quality of living and the economic, social, geographical, demographical and environmental vulnerability of the regions should be considered when it comes to the evaluation of projects that gain funding from the cohesion policy, in order to achieve the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy and to develop a balanced social market economy;
9. meni, da bodo, če imajo države članice znanstvene dokaze, ki potrjujejo pozitivne in dolgotrajne izkušnje pri uporabi obsežnih gospodarskih, okoljskih in socialnih kazalnikov, ki upoštevajo značilnosti vsake regije pri njihovi nacionalni politiki porazdelitve pri absorpciji strukturnega in kohezijskega sklada, potrebne nadaljnje raziskave o zanesljivosti, primernosti in možnih uporabah teh kazalnikov, da bi lahko bili kos skupnim evropskim izzivom;
Takes the view that, if Member States have scientific evidence that confirms successful and long-lasting experience in applying comprehensive economic, environmental and social indicators that take account of the attributes specific to each region in their national distribution policy when absorbing structural and cohesion funds, further investigations will be required on the reliability, suitability and possible application of those indicators in order to meet common European challenges;
Haralampos Angurakis (Charalampos Angourakis), Sophie Auconie, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Alain Cadec, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hjusmenova (Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova), María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jacek Olgierd Kurski, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Mihailis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Viktor Uspaskich, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Charalampos Angourakis, Sophie Auconie, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Alain Cadec, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jacek Olgierd Kurski, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Michail Tremopoulos, Viktor Uspaskich, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă, Bairbre de Brún, Jens Geier, Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Elisabeth Schroedter, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov), László Surján, Evžen Tošenovský, Sabine Verheyen
Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă, Bairbre de Brún, Jens Geier, Andrey Kovatchev, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Elisabeth Schroedter, Dimitar Stoyanov, László Surján, Evžen Tošenovský, Sabine Verheyen
o predlogu spremembe Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976
on a proposal for a modification of the Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976
Odbora za ustavne zadeve
Committee on Constitutional Affairs
PRILOGA I – Prečiščena različica Akta o volitvah predstavnikov Skupščine s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976 in sprememb tega akta 9
ANNEX I - Consolidated version of the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the Assembly by direct universal suffrage annexed to the Council decision of 20 September 1976, and of the subsequent amendments thereto 9
PRILOGA II – Predlog za spremembo pogodb..........................................................................14
ANNEX II ‑ Proposal for the amendment of the Treaties............................................................15
PRILOGA III – Osnutek predloga sklepa Sveta o sprejetju določb, ki spreminjajo Akt o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976 17
ANNEX III - Draft proposal for a Council decision adopting the provisions amending the Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976 19
Priloga k osnutku predloga sklepa Sveta o sprejetju določb, ki spreminjajo Akt o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976 18
Annex to the draft proposal for a Council Decision adopting the provisions amending the Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976 20
PRILOGA I K OBRAZLOŽITVI: Resolucija o osnutku volilnega postopka, ki bi vseboval skupna načela za izvolitev poslancev Evropskega parlamenta (poročilo Anastasopulos) 48
ANNEX I TO THE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT: Resolution on a draft electoral procedure incorporating common principles for the election of Members of the European Parliament (Anastassopoulos Report) 52
PRILOGA II K OBRAZLOŽITVI: Razdelitev sedežev (2009–2014).........................................50
ANNEX II TO THE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT: Distribution of Seats (2009 - 2014)......54
PRILOGA III K OBRAZLOŽITVI: Volilna udeležba na volitvah za Evropski parlament (1979 – 2009) 52
ANNEX III TO THE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT: European Parliament Voter Turnout (1979 - 2009) 56
PRILOGA IV K OBRAZLOŽITVI: Neravnovesje med spoloma...............................................53
ANNEX IV TO THE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT: Gender Imbalance..............................57
PRILOGA V K OBRAZLOŽITVI: za Evropski parlament: Sedanja volilna praksa v državah članicah 54
ANNEX V TO THE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT: European Parliament: Current Electoral Practice in Member States 58
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................61
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................64
– ob upoštevanju Akta o volitvah predstavnikov Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami, priloženega sklepu Sveta z dne 20. septembra 1976, kakor je bil spremenjen
– having regard to the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage annexed to the Council decision of 20 September 1976, as amended
Sklep Sveta št. 76/787/ESPJ, EGS, Euratom (UL L 278, 8.10.1976, str.
Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom (OJ L 278, 8.10.1976, p.
1), kakor je bi spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta št. 93/81/Euratom, ESPJ, EGS (UL L 33, 9.2.1993, str.
1) as amended by Council Decision 93/81/Euratom, ECSC, EEC (OJ L 33, 9.2.1993, p.
15) in s Sklepom Sveta št. 2002/772/ES, Euratom (UL L 283, 21.10.2002, str.
15) and by Council Decision 2002/772/EC, Euratom (OJ L 283, 21.10.2002, p.
1). , zlasti člena 14 akta,
1). , in particular Article 14 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o volilnem postopku Parlamenta, zlasti resolucije z dne 15. julija 1998
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the electoral procedure of the Parliament, in particular its resolution of 15 July 1998
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta z dne 14. decembra 2007,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council held on 14 December 2007,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. maja 2010 o osnutku protokola, ki spreminja Protokol (št. 36) o prehodni ureditvi glede sestave Evropskega parlamenta do konca parlamentarnega mandata 2009–2014: mnenje Evropskega parlamenta (člen 48(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji)
– having regard to its resolution of 6 May 2010 on the draft protocol amending Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions concerning the composition of the European Parliament for the rest of the 2009-2014 parliamentary term: the European Parliament's opinion (Article 48(3) of the EU Treaty)
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0148 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0148 . ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 39 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 39 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju členov 9, 10, 14(2) in 48(2), (3) in (4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členov 22, 223 in 225 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) ter člena 3 Protokola (št. 2) o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti,
– having regard to Articles 9, 10, 14(2) and 48(2), (3) and (4) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and to Articles 22, 223 and 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and to Article 3 of Protocol (No 2) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
– ob upoštevanju Protokola (št. 7) o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije,
– having regard to Protocol (No 7) on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije z dne 12. decembra 2006 ( KOM(2006)0791 ) o spremembi Direktive 93/109/ES z dne 6. decembra 1993 o podrobni ureditvi uresničevanja aktivne in pasivne volilne pravice na volitvah v Evropski parlament za državljane Unije, ki prebivajo v državi članici, niso pa njeni državljani,
– having regard to the proposal of the Commission of 12 December 2006 ( COM(2006)0791 ) for amending Directive 93/109/EC of 6 December 1993 as regards certain detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament for citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals,
– ob upoštevanju členov 41, 48(3) in 74a svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 41, 48(3) and 74a of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A7-0176/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A7-0176/2011 ),
E. z Lizbonsko pogodbo je bil spremenjen mandat članov Evropskega parlamenta, ki so postali neposredni predstavniki državljanov Unije
E. the Lisbon Treaty changed the mandate of Members of the European Parliament, making them direct representatives of the Union's citizens
Člena 10(2) in 14(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije. ,
Articles 10(2) and 14(2) TEU. ,
F. tudi brez dogovora o enotnem volilnem postopku je v tem obdobju prišlo do postopnega zbliževanja volilnih sistemov, zlasti z vsesplošnim sprejetjem proporcionalnega zastopstva leta 1999, formalno ustanovitvijo političnih strank na evropski ravni
F. even without agreement on a uniform electoral procedure, there has been a gradual convergence of electoral systems over this period, notably with the universal adoption of proportional representation in 1999, the formal establishment of political parties at EU level
1). in odpravo dvojnega mandata
1). and the abolition of the dual mandate
Sklep Sveta št. 2002/772/ES, Euratom, člen 1(7)(b). ,
Council Decision 2002/772/EC, Euratom, Article 1(7), point (b). ,
G. koncept evropskega državljanstva, ki je bil v ustavni red uradno vključen z Maastrichtsko pogodbo leta 1993, je prinesel pravico do udeležbe pod določenimi pogoji na evropskih občinskih volitvah v državi članici, ki ni matična država, Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, ki ima zdaj po določilih Lizbonske pogodbe pravno zavezujočo moč, pa je to pravico in druge državljanske pravice še povečala,
G. the concept of European Union citizenship, formally introduced into the constitutional order by the Treaty of Maastricht in 1993, included the right to participate under certain conditions in European and municipal elections in Member States other than one's own, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which now has binding legal force under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty, has reinforced that right and other civic rights,
H. priznavanje demokratične funkcije Parlamenta med ljudmi ostaja omejeno, politične stranke so na evropski ravni še zmerom na zgodnji stopnji razvoja, volilne kampanje so prej nacionalne kot evropske, medijsko poročanje o Parlamentu pa je neredno,
H. popular recognition of Parliament's democratic function remains limited, political parties at European level are still in the early stages of development, electoral campaigning remains more national than European, and media reporting of Parliament'proceedings is irregular,
I. skupna volilna udeležba na volitvah v Parlament je s 63 % leta 1979 upadla na 43 % leta 2009,
I. overall turnout in the elections to Parliament has fallen steadily from 63 per cent in 1979 to 43 per cent in 2009,