natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pred sprejetjem strožjih ukrepov v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 opravijo države članice oceno učinka glede vplivov na višino pristojbin za varovanje .
Before adopting more stringent measures pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 , Member States shall undertake an impact assessment with regard to the effects on the level of security charges.
Glede strožjih nacionalnih ukrepov, obstoječih dne [dan pričetka veljavnosti te direktive], opravijo države članice oceno učinka v prehodnem obdobju treh let od začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
With regard to more stringent national measures already existing on [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall undertake impact assessments during a transitional period of three years from the date of entry into force of this Directive .
Dodatne stroške izvajanja strožjih ukrepov v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 krijejo države članice.
The additional costs of implementing more stringent measures pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 shall be borne by the Member States .
Države članice o rezultatih ocen učinkov iz odstavka 1 obvestijo Komisijo in se v skladu s členom 4 o njih posvetujejo z uporabniki letališča.
Member States shall inform the Commission and consult airport users in accordance with Article 4 about the outcome of the impact assessments provided for in paragraph 1.
Obstaja povezava s predlogom spremembe 29.
Linked to Amendment 29.
(2a) Pred sprejetjem ukrepov v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 Komisija opravi presojo vpliva glede učinkov na višino pristojbin za varovanje.
(2a) Before adopting measures pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008, the Commission shall undertake an impact assessment with regard to the effects on the level of security charges.
Komisija se o rezultatih te presoje vpliva posvetuje s svetovalno interesno skupino, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008.
The Commission shall consult the Stakeholders’ Advisory Group constituted under Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 about the outcome of this impact assessment.
Evropska Komisija opravi tudi presojo vplivov, s katero pred sprejetjem novih ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu v skladu s pravili komitologije izmeri vpliv takih ukrepov na operaterje in potnike.
The European Commission shall also produce an impact assessment, measuring the operational impact on operators and passengers, before adopting new aviation security measures under comitology rules.
Mora biti jasno, da so pravila nujna.
The necessity of rules should be very clear.
Nedavni primer predpisov o tekočinah v ročni prtljagi je pokazal, kako pomembna sta presoja ter posvetovanje z operaterji in uporabniki za izbiro uravnoteženega ukrepa, s katerim je mogoče ublažiti grožnjo in omejiti učinke na obratovanje tako, da koristi potnikom in letalski industriji.
The recent example of the rules on the carriage of liquids in cabin luggage has shown the importance of such assessment and consultation with airport operators and users to select a balanced measure, capable to mitigate the threat and limiting the impact on operations for the benefit of the passengers and the aviation industry.
Pristojbine za varovanje se uporabljajo izključno za kritje stroškov za varovanje.
Security charges shall be used exclusively to meet security costs.
Celotni prihodek od pristojbin za varovanje ne sme presegati celotnih stroškov varovanja tega letališča ali omrežja ali skupine letališč.
The total revenue from security charges shall not be higher than the total costs of aviation security for that airport, airport network, or group of airports.
(2a) Stroškovna osnova za izračun pristojbin za varovanje ne vključuje stroškov, ki bi nastali zaradi splošnih varnostnih nalog, ki jih opravljajo države članice, kot so splošne policijske dejavnosti, zbiranje obveščevalnih podatkov in nacionalna varnost.
(2a) The cost base for the calculation of security charges shall not include any costs that would be incurred for more general security functions performed by Member States such as general policing, intelligence gathering and national security.
Na vseh letališčih je treba zagotoviti, da se pristojbine za varovanje uporabljajo izključno za kritje stroškov varovanja.
It needs to be ensured that, in all airports, security charges are used exclusively to meet security costs.
(1a) Ta direktiva nacionalnemu neodvisnemu nadzornemu organu ne preprečuje, da bi v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pod svojim nadzorom in polno odgovornostjo prenesel izvajanje te direktive na druge neodvisne nadzorne organe, če to izvajanje poteka v skladu z istimi standardi.
(1a) In compliance with national law, this Directive shall not prevent the national independent supervisory authority from delegating, under its supervision and full responsibility, the implementation of this Directive to other independent supervisory authorities, provided that implementation takes place in accordance with the same standards.
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti je pomembno, da obstaja možnost prenosa pristojnosti nacionalnega nadzornega organa na regionalne organe, ki so v federativnih ureditvah pristojni za gospodarsko ureditev letališč.
In compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, it is essential to have the possibility to delegate the powers of the national supervisory authority to regional authorities in charge of the economic regulation of airports in federal systems.
Države članice zagotovijo neodvisnost neodvisnega nadzornega organa tako, da zagotovijo njegovo pravno ločenost in funkcionalno neodvisnost od vseh organov upravljanja letališč ter letalskih prevoznikov.
Member States shall guarantee the independence of the independent supervisory authority by ensuring that it is legally distinct from and functionally independent of any airport managing body and air carrier.
Države članice, ki ohranijo lastništvo ali nadzor letališč, organov upravljanja letališč ali letalskih prevoznikov, zagotovijo učinkovito strukturno ločenost urejevalne funkcije od dejavnosti, povezanih z lastništvom ali nadzorom.
Member States that retain ownership or control of airports, airport managing bodies or air carriers shall ensure effective structural separation of the regulatory function from activities associated with ownership or control.
Države članice zagotovijo, da neodvisen nadzorni organ izvaja svoja pooblastila nepristransko in pregledno.
Member States shall ensure that the independent supervisory authority exercises its powers impartially and transparently.
Države članice zagotovijo neodvisnost neodvisnega nadzornega organa tako, da poskrbijo za njegovo pravno ločenost in funkcionalno neodvisnost od vseh pristojnih organov ali letalskih prevoznikov.
Member States shall guarantee the independence of the independent supervisory authority by ensuring that it is legally distinct from and functionally independent of any competent body or air carrier.
Člen 8 – odstavek 4 – točka (a)
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) vzpostavil postopek za reševanje nesoglasij med organom upravljanja letališča in uporabniki letališča;
(a) establish a procedure for resolving disagreements between the airport managing body and the airport users;
(a) vzpostavil postopek za reševanje nesoglasij med pristojnim organom in uporabniki letališča;
(a) establish a procedure for resolving disagreements between the competent body and the airport users;
Ko država članica v skladu s svojo nacionalno zakonodajo uporabi regulativni ali zakonodajni postopek za določitev in odobritev strukture ali višine pristojbin za varovanje na nacionalni ravni, nacionalni organi, odgovorni za preverjanje veljavnosti pristojbin za varovanje, opravijo naloge neodvisnega nadzornega organa, določene v členih od 1 do 5.
When a Member State applies, in accordance with its national law, a regulatory or legislative procedure to determine and approve the structure or level of security charges at national level, the national authorities responsible for examining the validity of security charges shall perform the tasks of the independent supervisory authority set out in paragraphs 1 to 5.
V teh primerih so pravni organi, pristojni za preučevanje pritožb na predpise ali zakone, tisti, ki bi morali opravljati nalogo neodvisnega nadzornega organa in odločati o pritožbah glede višine ali strukture pristojbin za varovanje.
In these cases it is the legal authorities responsible for investigating appeals to regulations or laws which should act as the independent supervisory authority and rule on challenges concerning the level or structure of security charges.
(2a) Komisija najkasneje v dveh letih po začetku veljavnosti te direktive predloži poročilo o financiranju varovanja v letalstvu, pregledu razvoja stroškov varovanja in načinih njegovega financiranja.
(2a) The Commission shall submit a report on the funding of aviation security, examining the evolution of aviation security costs and the methods for funding aviation security, no later than two years after entry into force of this Directive.
Komisija se kljub temu še vedno ukvarja s splošnim financiranjem varovanja v letalstvu in v dveh letih po sprejetju te direktive oblikuje nadaljnje poročilo z dodatnimi predlogi.
The Commission shall however continue reflecting about the overall funding of aviation security and shall produce a further report with additional proposals within the next two years following adoption of this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do [….] .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [….] at the latest .
Komisiji takoj predložijo besedilo navedenih predpisov in korelacijsko tabelo med navedenimi predpisi in to direktivo.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, pred…* .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive before ... * .
*OJ: prosimo, vstavite datum dve leti po začetku veljavnosti te direktive.
*OJ: Please insert the date 2 years after the entry into force of this Directive.
(2a) Če se pristojbine za varovanje v neki državi članici ne zaračunavajo na nobenem letališču in ne glede na člen 9(2), tej državi članici ni treba izpolniti zahtev iz odstavkov 1 in 2.
(2a) In so far as no security charges are levied at any airport in a Member State, and without prejudice to Article 9(2), that Member State shall not be required to comply with paragraphs 1 and 2.
Poročevalec v veliki meri podpira predlog Komisije, katerega namen je določiti sklop temeljnih načel, ki jih je treba pri določanju pristojbin za varovanje spoštovati.
Your rapporteur largely supports the Commission proposal which seeks to establish a number of basic principles to be respected when determining security charges.
Ta so: nediskriminacija, posvetovanje in izboljšave, preglednost stroškov in njihova navezava na pristojbine za varovanje ter ustanovitev nadzornega organa.
These are: non-discrimination, consultation and remedy, transparency and cost-relatedness of security charges and establishment of a supervisory authority.
Predlagane spremembe lahko strnemo v:
The proposed amendments may be summarised as follows:
Evropski parlament je že večkrat zaman zahteval, da bi se uredilo financiranje pristojbin za varovanje, tako zlasti pri pogajanjih o Uredbi (ES) št. 300/2008 o skupnih pravilih na področju varovanja civilnega letalstva in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002 (poročilo Costa) ter o Direktivi 2009/12 o letaliških pristojbinah (poročilo Stockmann).
Parliament had repeatedly called in vain for the financing of security charges to be regulated, particularly in the negotiations on Regulation (EC) 300/2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) 2320/2002 (Costa report) and on Directive 2009/12 on airport charges (Stockmann report).
Parlament je zahteval preglednost in namensko uporabo taks in pristojbin za varovanje ter razsodil, da bi morale države članice prevzeti stroške za izvajanje strožjih ukrepov po členu 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008..
Parliament called for transparency and for security taxes and charges to be related to their purpose and considered that Member States should cover the costs of imposing stricter measures , in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 .
Kot je bilo pojasnjeno že v delovnem dokumentu, Evropska komisija ni hotela ali ni mogla obravnavati tega vprašanja.
As already explained in the working document, the Commission was unwilling or unable to address this issue.
Edino, kar poskuša, je omejiti stroške ali vsaj zagotoviti njihovo preglednost (gl. člen 6 predloga) z novo obvezno oceno gospodarskih učinkov strožjih ukrepov, uvedenih na nacionalni ravni.
It o nly attempts to restrict costs or at least to make them comprehensible (see Article 6 of the proposal) through a new mandatory economic impact assessment of more stringent national measures.
Medtem pa poročevalec predlaga, da bi te strožje ukrepe, če povzročajo dodatne stroške, plačevale države članice.
However, your rapporteur proposes that, where these more stringent measures result in additional costs, they should be borne by Member States .
V tem primeru ni potrebna obvezna ocena učinka, saj bo vsaka država članica sama temeljito premislila, ali so ukrepi potrebni, če stroškov ne bo mogla prevaliti na potnike.
In this case no mandatory impact assessment would be necessary, since each Member State would think very hard about whether these measures were necessary , if it was unable to pass the costs on to passengers .
Teroristični incident pred nekaj tedni je spet pokazal, da so za varnost na letališčih odgovorne države in da se obstoječi ter novi ukrepi varovanja sprejemajo za preprečevanje terorističnih dejanj.
The terrorist incident a few weeks ago has again shown that airport security is the responsibility of S tates and that the purpose of existing and newly envisaged se curity measures is to prevent acts of t errorism.
Točka, o kateri se doslej ni razpravljalo, pa je, da ukrepe nenazadnje plačujejo potniki.
However, one point that has not so far been raised in the debate on the matter is the fact that it is ultimately passengers who foot the bill for such measures .
2) Varstvo potrošnikov in pravice potnikov
2) Consumer protection and passengers' rights
V predlogu Komisije so določena temeljna načela in postopki, ki veljajo za organ, pristojen za varovanje, in letalske družbe.
The Commission proposal sets out basic principles and procedures applicable to the body responsible for security and the airlines.
Odnose med uporabniki letališča in potniki ureja Uredba (ES) št. 1008/2008.
Relations between airport users and passengers are governed by Regulation (EC) 1008/2008.
Člen 23 o pravici potnikov do obveščenosti in enaki obravnavi vsebuje določbe, po katerih so potniki upravičeni do ločene navedbe dejanskih stroškov varovanja v končnem računu.
Article 23 on passengers’ right to information and non-discrimination contains provisions giving passengers the right to have the actual cost of security shown separately in the final price.
Toda kako naj potniki vedo, da dejansko plačujejo ceno, za katero se je pristojna služba dogovorila z letalsko družbo po členu 4 tega predloga direktive.
But how can passengers be sure that they are paying the actual price agreed between the competent body and the airlines in accordance with Article 4 of this proposal for a directive?
In kako je mogoče zagotoviti preglednost nad dodatnimi pristojbinami, ki jih letalske družbe zaračunavajo za varovanje?
And what steps can be taken to ensure that the additional security charges levied by the airlines are transparent?
Poročevalec meni, da bo člen 23 Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 lažje uveljaviti s predlaganimi spremembami.
Your rapporteur takes the view that it will be easier to enforce Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 with the proposed amendments.
Po eni strani se predlaga, da bi organizacije potnikov in potrošnikov prisostvovale posvetovanjem in tako dobile vpogled v cenitev ukrepov varovanja, ki jo lahko potem preverjajo v ceni leta.
On the one hand, it is proposed that passenger and consumer protection organisations should take part in the consultations and thus gain an insight into the pricing of security measures which they can then check against the ticket price.
Po drugi strani se želi s spremenjenimi ali novimi opredelitvami pristojbin za varovanje in varovanja v letalstvu pojasniti, da morajo za ukrepe varovanja poskrbeti tudi letalske družbe.
On the other hand, the amended or new definitions of security charges and aviation security are intended to show that airlines too are taking security measures.
Če te ukrepe dodatno zaračunavajo potnikom, mora biti podatek o tem na voljo v skladu s členom 5 predloga direktive.
Where airlines charge these security measures to passengers as additional costs, this information should be provided under the terms of Article 5 of the proposal for a directive.
3) Področje uporabe direktive
3) Scope of the directive
Komisija predlaga, da bi se direktiva izvajala tako rekoč na vseh letališčih EU in sicer v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 300/2008.
The Commission proposes that the directive should apply to practically all EU airports in line with Regulation (E C) N o 300/2008.
Pogajanja v delovni skupini Sveta pa kažejo, da gre za zelo sporno vprašanje.
However, negotiations in the Council working party show that this is a very controversial issue.
Nekatere države članice bi želele direktivo uporabljati samo na letališčih z več kot dvema ali petimi milijoni potnikov (v skladu z direktivo o storitvah zemeljske oskrbe na letališčih in o letaliških pristojbinah).
Some Member States would prefer to see the directive apply only to airports with more than two or five million passengers (in line with the Directive on ground-handling service at airports and airport charges).
Poročevalec bi rad poudaril, da je treba direktivo izvajati le v državah članicah, ki zaračunavajo pristojbine za varovanje.
Your rapporteur would like to point out that the directive must only be implemented in those Member States which levy security charges.
Poleg tega naj bi veljala le na letališčih, ki imajo dovoljenje za komercialni promet (ne pa na društvenih in športnih letališčih).
Furthermore, it is intended to apply only in airports licensed for commercial traffic (no aviation clubs).
4) Uskladitev predloga Komisije z Direktivo 2009/12/ES o letaliških pristojbinah
4) Harmonisation of the Commission proposal with Directive 2009/12/EC on airport charges
Predlog Komisije se v veliki meri opira na direktivo o letaliških pristojbinah.
The Commission proposal draws heavily on the Directive on airport charges.
Namen predlogov sprememb je, kolikor je mogoče in smiselno, uskladiti obe pravni besedili.
The amendments seek, as far as possible and desirable, to harmonise the two legal texts.
Poročevalec meni, da se s tem ne bo le olajšal prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo, ampak se bo na stopnji izvajanja mogoče izogniti tudi nepotrebnim vzporednim postopkom in upravnim stroškom.
Your rapporteur believes that this will not only facilitate transposition into national legislation, but also prevent unnecessary parallel proceedings and administrative costs at the implementation stage.
o smernicah za proračunski postopek 2011, oddelek I – Evropski parlament, oddelek II – Svet, oddelek IV – Sodišče, oddelek V – Računsko sodišče, oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, oddelek VII – Odbor regij, oddelek VIII – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, oddelek IX – Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov
on the guidelines for the 2011 budget procedure, Section I – European Parliament, Section II – Council, Section IV – Court of Justice, Section V – Court of Auditors, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII – Committee of the Regions, Section VIII – European Ombudsman, Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor
– ob upoštevanju člena 314 Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
– having regard to Article 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
- ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2007/436/ES, Euratom z dne 7. junija 2007 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti,
- having regard to Council Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom of 7 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities’ own resources
- ob upoštevanju petega poročila generalnih sekretarjev institucij o razvojnih smernicah razdelka 5 finančne perspektive iz maja 2009,
- having regard to the sixth report by the Secretaries-General of the institutions on trends in heading 5 of the financial perspective, as revised in autumn 2009,
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2008, skupaj z odgovori institucij,
– having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2008, together with the institutions’ replies
UL C 269, 10.11.2009, str.
OJ C 269, 10.11.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun (A7-00362010),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7‑0036/2010 ),
A. ker Evropski parlament na tej stopnji letnega postopka čaka na načrte odhodkov drugih institucij in predloge svojega predsedstva za proračun za leto 2011,
A. whereas, at this stage of the annual procedure, the European Parliament is awaiting the other institutions’ estimates and its own Bureau’s proposals for the 2011 budget,
B. ker je koristno, da se poskusni projekt okrepljenega sodelovanja in odnosov med predsedstvom in Odborom za proračun nadaljuje tudi v tretjem letu, med celotnim proračunskim postopkom za leto 2011,
B. whereas it is useful to continue the pilot exercise on enhanced cooperation and relations between the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets for a third year, throughout the 2011 budget procedure,
C. ker zgornja meja razdelka 5 za leto 2011 znaša 8.415.000.000 EUR (povečanje za 327.000.000 EUR ali 4 % v primerjavi z letom 2010, vključno z upoštevanjem dvoodstotne inflacije),
C. whereas the ceiling for heading 5 in 2011 is EUR 8 415 000 000 (representing an increase of EUR 327 000 000, or 4%, compared with 2010, including 2% for inflation),
D. ker proračun Evropskega parlamenta za leto 2010 znaša 1.607.363.235 EUR, kar pomeni 19,87 % razdelka 5 za to leto pred revizijo večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013, s katero je bila zgornja meja razdelka 5 znižana za 126.000.000 EUR, da bi prispevali k financiranju evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, po tej reviziji pa znaša 20,19 %;
D. whereas the European Parliament’s budget for 2010 amounts to EUR 1 607 363 235, representing 19.87% of heading 5 for this year before the revision of the 2007‑2013 MFF (which lowered the ceiling of heading 5 by EUR 126 000 000 in order to contribute to the financing of the European Economic Recovery Plan), and 20.19% after that revision,
E. ker je treba upoštevati, kako so se razvijali deleži odhodkov institucij v razdelku 5, in različne razloge za občutne spremembe, kot so začetek veljavnosti nekaterih pogodb (s čimer se je povečalo število poslancev oziroma so se povečale naloge in pristojnosti institucij), širitev ter druge odločitve, ki imajo za posledico pomenljivo povečanje odhodkov, ki ni bilo predvideno ob sprejemanju finančnega okvira,
E. whereas account needs to be taken of how each institution’s share of heading 5 expenditure has evolved, and of the various reasons for significant modifications, such as the entry into force of different treaties (increasing the number of Members and/or extending the different institutions’ tasks and competences), enlargement and other decisions entailing significant expenditure increases not foreseen at the time the financial framework was adopted,