natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Uporaba istega imena za sosednjo državo, ki ima drug jezik in drugačno kulturo, povzroča v grški javnosti precejšnja nasprotovanja.
The use of the same name by a neighbouring state with different language and culture provokes considerable objections from public opinion in Greece.
Grški ugovori niso povezani z zanikanjem pravice države do neodvisnosti ali z zavračanjem učinkovitega sodelovanja s severno sosedo, temveč z željo, da bi z dodatkom besed „Vardar“, „Skopje“ ali „Sever“ pojasnili, da država z ustavnimi imenom „Republika Makedonija“ ne vključuje celotnega območja, ki z zgodovinskega stališča šteje za Makedonijo.
The Greek objections are not about denying the country’s right to independence or rejecting effective cooperation with the northern neighbour, but a wish to express the idea, by adding concepts such as ‘Vardar’, Skopje’ or ‘North’, that the state with the constitutional name of ‘Republic of Macedonia’ does not include the whole area that is regarded historically as Macedonia.
Združeni narodi na podlagi začasnega sporazuma od leta 1993 začasno imenujejo državo „Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija“, pri čemer pogosto uporabljajo angleško okrajšavo „fYRoM“ ( former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ), kar tako doma kot v tujini povzroča veliko zmedo v javnosti.
Under an interim agreement the United Nations has since 1993 provisionally designated the country as the ‘Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’, often presented as the English abbreviation ‘FYRoM’, which is totally mystifying to public opinion both at home and abroad.
Združene države Amerike, Ruska federacija, Ljudska republika Kitajska in celo nekatere države članice EU uporabljajo ustavno ime Republika Makedonija ter izpuščajo omembo prejšnjega upravnega položaja, ki je zajet v izrazu „fYRoM“.
However, the United States, Russian Federation, People’s Republic of China and even a number of EU Member States use the constitutional name of ‘Republic of Macedonia’, omitting the reference to the previous administrative situation included in the term ‘FYRoM’.
Takšno sklicevanje na zgodovino ni običajno.
Historical references of this kind are unusual.
Sicer v Evropi, poleg neodvisne države Luksemburg, obstaja tudi belgijska pokrajina, ki meji na to državo in se imenuje enako, neodvisna država Moldavija pa nosi isto ime kot severovzhodni del sosednje Romunije.
Moreover there is in Europe, in addition to the independent state of Luxembourg, also an adjoining Belgian province with the same name, while the independent state of Moldova coincides with the use of the same name for the north-east of neighbouring Romania.
Država Azerbajdžan, ki je geografsko del Evrope, ima isto ime kot dve sosednji pokrajini v Iranu.
Again, the state of Azerbaijan, geographically part of Europe, bears the same name as two adjoining provinces of Iran.
V vseh teh primerih ponovljena uporaba istega imena ne povzroča težav.
In all these cases the repeated use of the same name causes no problems.
Zato je jasno, da v primeru Makedonije ne gre toliko za spor glede imena, kot za strah pred teritorialnimi zahtevami.
Clearly therefore, in this case the dispute is not so much over a name as over fears of claims on territory.
V zvezi s tem je vsega obžalovanja vredno, da je bilo nacionalno letališče, ki leži vzhodno od Skopja in se je do leta 2006 imenovalo Aerodrom Skopje ali Letališče Petrovec, pozneje preimenovano v Aleksandar Veliki (Aleksander Veliki).
In this connection it is much to be regretted that the national airport, located to the east of Skopje, which until December 2006 was known as Aerodrom Skopje or Petrovec Airport, has since then been dubbed Alexander the Great ( Aleksandar Veliki ).
Zaradi uporabe tega pojma lahko pride do zamenjave z imenom obstoječega letališča Megas Alexandros , ki leži vzhodno od mesta Kavale na severu Grčije, in ima isti pomen.
This symbol gives rise to confusion with the existing international airport of Megas Alexandros to the east of the northern Greek city of Kavala, a name with the same meaning.
Državi bi morali zaradi obojestranskega zaupanja pred vstopom Makedonije v EU skleniti dvostranski sporazum o uporabi imen v medsebojnih odnosih ter o odpravi stalnih nesporazumov in vznemirjanj v zvezi s simboli in teritorialnimi zahtevami.
For the sake of mutual confidence it is important that before accession to the EU a bilateral agreement is concluded between the two countries over the use of names in their mutual relations and over the removal of any continuing misunderstandings or irritations concerning symbols and territorial claims.
Drugi premisleki
Other considerations
Vključevanje v EU ne poteka nič hitreje, zato pa raste zanimanje za Združene države Amerike.
While integration with the EU is not being speeded up, orientation towards the United States is increasing.
Med drugim so to pokazali sporazumi o neizročanju ameriških državljanov mednarodnemu kazenskemu sodišču v Haagu in ugrabitev nemškega državljana Khaleda el Masrija, ter njegova izročitev preiskovalcem Cie v Afganistanu.
This has found expression, amongst other things, in agreements not to hand over any American to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague and in the abduction of the German citizen Khaled el-Masri to CIA investigators in Afghanistan.
Bolj pozitivno pa je, da sodelovanje pri stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenem sporazumu in srednjeevropskem sporazumu o prosti trgovini (CEFTA), ki je povezan z EU, lahko pomaga oživiti in okrepiti gospodarstvo, ki je v težavah že od leta 1991.
More positively, participation in the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) and the Central European Free Trade Association (CEFTA), which is linked with the EU, may help to revive and strengthen the economy, which has been ailing since 1991.
Notranja pravna varnost bo ta učinek bolj povečala kot trenutni cilj znižanja davčne stopnje na skrajno nizko vrednost 10 %.
Internal legal certainty will increase this effect more than the current aim of reducing tax rates to the extremely low level of 10 %.
Poročilo o napredku Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije za leto 2006
The 2006 Progress Report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
o posebnem poročilu Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 9/2006 o odhodkih Komisije, Parlamenta in Sveta za prevajanje
on Special Report No 9/2006 of the European Court of Auditors concerning translation expenditure incurred by the Commission, the Parliament and the Council
- ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 9/2006 o odhodkih Komisije, Parlamenta in Sveta za prevajanje z odgovori institucij
- having regard to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report n°9/2006 on the translation expenditure incurred by the Commission, the Parliament and the Council together with the Institutions' replies
UL C 284, 21.11.2006, str.
OJ C 284, 21.11.2006, p.
- ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 276(3) in člena 280(5) pogodbe o ES,
- having regard to Article 248(4), first subparagraph, Article 276(3) and Article 280(5) of the EC Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0215/2007 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0215/2007 ),
3. obžaluje, da je vedno več dokumentov ali sporočil, zlasti sporazumnih predlogov sprememb, ali na primer prilog k poročilom, predstavljenih ob času glasovanja v odborih le v enem jeziku;
Regrets that more and more documents or communications, in particular compromise amendments when put to the vote in committee or, for instance, annexes to reports, are submitted in one language only;
Stroški prevajanja
Cost of translations
V skladu z mnenjem Računskega sodišča skupni stroški vključujejo prevajalce, tajnike, vodstvo, uslužbence prevajalske službe, enoto za načrtovanje, poslopja, informacijsko tehnologijo in upravljanje kadrov (torej usposabljanje). niti svojih stroškov na stran; razen tega ugotavlja, da je Evropsko računsko sodišče (ERS) ocenilo skupne stroške prevajanja za leto 2003 na 414,2 milijona EUR (2005: 511 milijonov EUR), 214,8 milijona za Komisijo (2005: 257 milijonov EUR), 99 milijonov za Parlament (2005: 128 milijonov EUR), 100,4 milijona za Svet (2005: 126 milijonov EUR); za isto leto se je povprečni strošek na stran povišal na 166,37 EUR (2005: 196,3 EUR); 150,2 EUR za Komisijo (2005: 194 EUR), 149,7 za Parlament (2005: 119 EUR), 251,8 za Svet (2005: 276 EUR);
According to the Court those figures entail costs for translators, secretaries, management, service staff, planning, building, IT, and human resource management (i.e. training). , nor their costs per page; notes furthermore, that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) estimated the full cost of translation, in 2003, at EUR 414,2 million (2005: EUR 511 million), 214,8 million for the Commission (2005: EUR 257 million), EUR 99 million for the Parliament (2005: EUR 128 million) and EUR 100,4 million for the Council (2005: EUR 126 million); for the same year the average costs per page stood at EUR 166,37 (2005: EUR 196,3): EUR 150,2 for the Commission (2005: EUR 194), EUR 149,7 for the Parliament (2005: EUR 119), and EUR 251,8 for the Council (2005: EUR 276);
12. poziva tri institucije, naj uvedejo jasne in primerljive stroškovne parametre, da bi ugotovile skupne stroške prevajanja in ceno na stran; poudarja, da bilo treba tako izračunane zneske uporabiti ne le za proračunske namene, temveč tudi za osveščanje uporabnikov;
Calls on the three institutions to establish clear and comparable cost parameters with a view to ascertaining both the total cost of translation and the price per page; stresses that the sums obtained should be used not only for budgetary purposes, but also to raise cost awareness among users;
PE 368.524/BUR/Corr, zapisnik seje predsedstva s 16. januarja 2006. , da je treba dobesedne zapise s plenarnih zasedanj objaviti v obliki večjezičnega dokumenta, ki bo vseboval izjave govornikov v izvirnem jeziku, pri tem pa bodo posnetki razprav, skupaj s simultanim tolmačenjem v vse uradne jezike brezplačno na voljo splošni javnosti na zahtevo in v ustrezni tehnični obliki ter da je verodostojen samo izvirnik, saj s pravnega vidika tolmačenje ni ustno prevajanje; meni, da morajo poslanci biti upravičeni do takojšnjega dostopa do povzetkov razprav, prevedenih v svoj jezik, in imeti možnost njihovega takojšnjega nalaganja; meni tudi, da je treba sprejeti ukrepe za vzpostavitev digitalnega in iskanju pripravnega arhiva; zahteva, da generalni sekretar pripravi formalni predlog za izvajanje sklepa o načelu, ki bi vključeval klavzule proti zlorabi, ter, če je potrebno, ugotovi morebitne spremembe poslovnika (npr. člena 173) in drugih notranjih pravil, ki so potrebna za izvajanje predvidenega novega pristopa;
PE 368.524/BUR/Corr, minutes of Bureau meeting on 16 January 2006. that verbatim reports of proceedings in the plenary should be published as a multi-lingual document in which the statements of the speakers only appear in the original language of the statement, on the understanding that filmed versions of the debates, together with live interpretation into all the official languages be made available free of charge to the general public on demand on an appropriate technical platform and that only the original text is authoritative, given that, legally, interpretation is not an oral translation ; is of the opinion that Members must be entitled to have access to extracts of debates translated into their languages, with the possibility of downloading them and without delay; is also of the opinion that provision must be made to keep a digital and searchable archive; requests the Secretary-General to draw up a formal proposal implementing that decision of principle, which would include anti-abuse clauses and identify, if indicated, potential changes to the Rules of Procedure (e.g. Rule 173) and to other internal rules necessary to put the envisaged new approach into practice;
Kakovost prevodov
Quality of translations
Postopki za upravljanje zahtev za prevod
Procedures for managing translation demands
Člen 12(2) kodeksa o večjezičnosti. ; poudarja, da je treba v zameno uporabnike obveščati o stroških, ki nastanejo zaradi njihovih zahtev za prevode;
Article 12(2) of the Code of Conduct on Multilingualism. ; stresses that, in return, users should be informed of the costs incurred by their requests for translation;
Učinkovitost prevajalskega postopka
Efficiency of the translation process
26. poziva Parlament, Svet in Komisijo, da učinkovito in uspešno uporabljajo notranje in zunanje vire, kot so podatkovne zbirke, računalniško prevajanje, delo na daljavo in zunanje prevajanje;
Calls on the Parliament, the Council and the Commission to make efficient and effective use of the internal and external resources, such as data bases, computer-assisted translations, teleworking and outsourcing;
Evropsko računsko sodišče je 13. septembra 2006 Odboru za proračunski nadzor predstavilo posebno poročilo št. 9/2006 o odhodkih Komisije, Parlamenta in Sveta za prevajanje.
On 13 September 2006 the European Court of Auditors (ECA) presented its Special Report n°9/2006 concerning translation expenditures incurred by the Commission, the Parliament and the Council to the Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT).
Status uradnega in delovnega jezika evropskih institucij ima enaindvajset jezikov.
Twenty-one languages have the status of official and working languages of the European institutions.
Vsaka institucija EU ima svojo prevajalsko službo.
Each EU institution has its own translation service.
Institucije, ki morajo zaradi svojih dejavnosti zagotavljati največje število prevodov, so Komisija, Parlament in Svet (približno 70 %).
The institutions which, on account of their activities, have to provide the largest volume of translations are the Commission, the Parliament and the Council (approximately 70° %).
Iz praktičnih razlogov je število jezikov, ki se najpogosteje uporabljajo v institucijah, omejeno, vendar je dokumentacija, prejeta ali poslana v države članice, v njihovem uradnem jeziku.
For practical reasons the languages most frequently used within the institutions are reduced in number, but documentation received from, and sent to Member States is in their official languages.
Prevodi prejetih in poslanih dokumentov so zato ključnega pomena za dobro delovanje institucij ter komunikacijo z državami članicami in njihovimi državljani.
The translation of incoming and outgoing documents is therefore vital to the sound running of the institutions, and for communicating with Member States and their citizens.
Načelo večjezičnosti, kot je določeno v členih 21, 290 in 314 pogodbe o EU. je ena ključnih značilnosti Evropske unije, ki poudarja kulturno in jezikovno raznolikost ter zagotavlja enako obravnavanje državljanov EU.
The principle of multilingualism is laid down in Articles 21, 290 and 314 of the EU Treaty is one of the key features of the European Union, which highlights cultural and linguistic diversity and ensures equal treatment of EU citizens.
Državljanom EU zagotavlja pravico, da se z institucijami EU sporazumevajo v katerem koli uradnem jeziku, s čemer lahko uveljavljajo svojo pravico do demokratičnega nadzora.
It guarantees citizens' right to communicate with the EU institutions in any of its official languages, thus enabling them to exercise their right of democratic control.
Hkrati pa jezikovne službe pripomorejo k temu, da ostajajo institucije EU odprte in pregledne za državljane Evrope.
At the same, time the linguistic services contribute to the EU institutions remaining open and transparent to the citizens of Europe.
V Parlamentu rabo uradnih jezikov ureja "Kodeks o večjezičnosti", ki je bil posodobljen leta 2004; poslovnik Evropskega parlamenta določa, da lahko poslanci govorijo v katerem koli uradnem jeziku, in zagotavlja tolmačenje v druge jezike.
In Parliament the use of official languages is governed by its 'Code of Conduct on Multilingualism', updated in 2004; its Rules of Procedure stipulate that Members may speak in the official language of their choice and that interpretation into the other languages is provided.
Celotni stroški vseh jezikovnih služb institucij EU, tj. prevajanja in tolmačenja, pomenijo približno 1 % celotnega proračuna EU.
The total cost of all the linguistic services of the EU institutions, translation and interpretation combined, represent approximately 1 % of the total EU budget.
Večjezičnost je izraz kulturne raznolikosti EU, naraščajoče število uradnih jezikov pa sili v iskanje pragmatičnih rešitev pri pripravljalnem delu v institucijah.
While multilingualism is an expression of the EU's cultural diversity, the increasing number of official languages calls for pragmatic solutions in the preparatory work within the institutions.
Namen revizije
Objective of the audit
Cilj revizije je bil oceniti, v kolikšni meri Komisija, Parlament in Svet svoje prevajalske vire in odhodke upravljajo učinkovito in uspešno.
The objective of the audit was to assess the extent to which the Commission, the Parliament and the Council manage their translation resources and expenditure efficiently and effectively.
Sodišče je obravnavalo tri vprašanja:
The Court addressed three questions:
· Ali so zahteve za prevod izpolnjene in ali obstajajo primerni postopki za izogibanje nepotrebnim prevodom?
· Is translation demand met and are there adequate procedures to avoid unnecessary translations?
· Ali so prevodi pravočasni in ali njihova kakovost ustreza njihovemu namenu?
· Are translations timely and of adequate quality for their purpose?
· Ali so institucije obvladovale stroške prevajanja?
· Were the institutions able to keep the cost of translations under control?
Revizija je zajemala predvsem leti 2003 in 2004, upoštevala pa je tudi spremembe, ki so leta 2005 nastale zaradi širitve.
The audit principally covered the years 2003 and 2004, but changes which occurred in 2005 as a consequence of enlargement were also taken into consideration.
Upravljanje zahtev po tolmačenju
Management of interpretation demands
Potrebne bi bile jasne smernice za določitev meril glede zahtev za prevajanje.
Clear guidelines would be necessary to establish criteria for translation requests.
Vendar po besedah Sodišča nobena institucija ni vzpostavila usklajenih in jasnih postopkov, ki opredeljujejo, kdo lahko prevod zahteva, katere vrste dokumentov morajo biti prevedene (kdaj in v katere jezike), merila za odobritev neobveznih prevodov in postopkov za spremljanje izvajanja "politike prevajanja".
However, according to the Court, none of the institutions has established consistent and clear procedures defining who can request a translation, which types of documents should be translated (when and into which languages), criteria for authorising non-mandatory translations and procedures for monitoring the enforcement of "translation policy".
Institucije so zahteve za prevod v jezike EU-15 običajno izpolnjevale, razmere pa so bile drugačne za 10 novih jezikov (EU-10) zaradi nezadostnega števila prevajalcev iz novih držav članic.
Requests for translations concerning the EU-15 languages were generally met by the institutions, whereas the situation was different for the 10 new enlargement languages (EU-10) due to an insufficient number of translators from the new Member States.
Nobena institucija ni izpolnila ciljev glede zaposlovanja prevajalcev in podpornega osebja za nove prevajalske enote.
None of the institutions was able to meet its targets for recruitment of staff translators and support staff for the new language units.
V preteklih letih so institucije uspele omejiti povečanje obsega prevajalskega dela tako, da so sprejele naslednje ukrepe:
Over recent years the institutions have managed to limit the increase in translation volume using the following measures:
· oblikovanje seznama "glavnih dokumentov",
· establishing a list of "core documents",
· omejitev dolžine besedil,
· limiting the maximum length of texts,
· priprava povzetkov v različnih jezikih namesto popolnih prevodov,
· offering executive summaries in different languages rather than complete translation,
· osredotočanje na prevajanje končnih različic dokumentov,
· concentrating on translating the final version of documents,
· spodbujanje uporabnikov k omejitvi obsega.
· encourage users to exercise restraint.
Kontrola kakovosti
Quality control
Kakovost prevodov v jezike EU-15 je bila običajno dobra.
The quality of translations into the EU-15 languages was generally considered to be good.
Vendar pa je Sodišče ugotovilo slabšo kakovost pri prevodih v jezike EU-10.
However, the Court noticed quality problems for translations into the EU-10 languages.
Približno 90 % prevodov je bilo dokončanih v dogovorjenih rokih.
About 90% of translations were finished within the agreed deadlines.
Generalni direktorat Komisije za prevajanje (DGT) deli vse prevode v pet kategorij "kakovosti prevodov" z različno stopnjo pregledovanja in/ali ocenjevanja kakovosti glede na vrsto dokumenta.
At the Commission, the Directorate General for Translation (DGT) divides all translations into five categories of "translation quality types" (TQT), with a different degree of revision and/or quality evaluation according to the type of document.
Poleg tega nekateri generalni direktorati Komisije, na primer GD za konkurenco, sistematično pregledujejo prevode, ki jih prejmejo.
In addition, some Commission DGs, such as DG Competition, systematically review the translations they receive.
Parlament in Svet ne porazdeljujeta prevodov po kategorijah kakovosti, zato so njuni postopki nadzora kakovosti manj strukturirani.
The Parliament and the Council do not allocate translations to quality categories and their quality control procedures are therefore less structured.
Zato so prakse pregledovanja zelo različne, čeprav zakonodajne akte pred objavo vedno pregledajo pravniki lingvisti.
As a result, revision practices vary significantly, although legislative acts are always revised by lawyer-linguists before publication.
Poleg tega Parlament vsaka dva meseca opravlja naključne preglede, da preveri črkovanje in slovnico.
In addition, the Parliament uses bi-monthly random checks to verify spelling and grammar.
Nobena prevajalska služba institucij ni vzpostavila posebnih orodij za merjenje zadovoljstva uporabnikov ali formuliranih postopkov za obravnavo pritožb glede kakovosti.
None of the institutions' translation services has put in place specific tools to measure users' satisfaction or formulated procedures for handling complaints about quality.
Stroški in učinkovitost prevodov
Cost and efficiency of translations
Institucije doslej niso izračunale niti celotnih stroškov prevajanja niti stroškov na stran.
In the past he institutions have calculated neither their total translation costs, not their costs per page.
Sodišče je ocenilo celotne stroške prevajanja
For 2003 the Court estimated the full costs of translations
V skladu z mnenjem Sodišča skupni stroški vključujejo prevajalce, tajnike, vodstvo, uslužbence prevajalske službe, enoto za načrtovanje, poslopja, informacijsko tehnologijo in upravljanje kadrov (torej usposabljanje). za leto 2003 na 414,2 milijona EUR: 214,8 milijona EUR za Komisijo, 99 milijonov EUR za Parlament in 100,4 milijona EUR za Svet.
Full costs entail, according to the Court, costs for translators, secretaries, management, service staff, planning, building, IT, and human resource management (i. e. training). at EUR 414.2 million: Commission - EUR 214.8 million, Parliament - EUR 99 million and Council - EUR 100.4 million.
Povprečni strošek na stran je bil 166,37 EUR: 150,2 EUR za Komisijo, 149,7 EUR za Parlament in 251,8 EUR za Svet.
The average cost per page was EUR 166.37: Commission - EUR 150.2, Parliament - EUR 149.7 and Council - EUR 251.8.
Zunanje prevajanje je bilo približno za 30 % cenejše kot notranje.
External translations were approximately 30% cheaper than in-house translations.
Institucije na splošno niso pripravile zadovoljivih kazalcev in upravljavskih informacij za nadzor postopka prevajanja.
In general, the institutions did not produce sufficient indicators and management information to monitor the translation process.