natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
W. ker se je Evropski razvojni sklad večinoma uporabljal za financiranje novih pobud; ker mora Komisija spoštovati svojo zavezanost iskanju novih virov financiranja, da se ta sklad ohrani; ker je odbor za razvoj Evropskega parlamenta že večkrat sklenil, da je treba Evropski razvojni sklad vključiti v proračun EU, da se zagotovi demokratičen nadzor nad načinom njegove uporabe,
W. whereas the EDF has mainly been used to finance new initiatives; whereas the Commission should respect its commitment to find new financing sources in order to preserve the EDF; whereas Parliament's Committee on Development has concluded on numerous occasions that the EDF should be integrated into the EU budget in order to ensure democratic control over the way it is used,
X. ker ima Evropski parlament po členu 21 instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje o sprejetju strateških dokumentov in večletnih okvirnih programov ter členu 35(2) instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje pravico do nadzora nad dejavnostmi Komisije, kot to določata člena 5 in 8 Sklepa 1999/468/ES,
X. whereas in accordance with Article 21 on the adoption of strategy papers and multiannual indicative programs and Article 35(2) of the DCI, Parliament has a right of scrutiny over Commission actions as laid down in Articles 5 and 8 of Decision 1999/468/EC,
Y. ker mehanizem čistega razvoja doslej ni uspešno izpolnjeval potreb najrevnejših držav po naložbah v čisto tehnologijo, saj se v Afriki izvaja manj kot 3 % vseh projektov mehanizma čistega razvoja, skoraj 90 % enot potrjenega zmanjšanja emisij pa je dodeljenih za projekte, ki se izvajajo na Kitajskem ter v Indiji, Koreji in Braziliji;
Y. whereas the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has so far been poorly suited to meeting the needs of the poorest countries for investments in clean technology, with Africa hosting less than 3% of all CDM projects, and nearly 90% of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) being granted for projects carried out in China, India, Korea and Brazil,
4. ugotavlja, da morajo prizadevanja za boj proti podnebnim spremembam temeljiti ne le na politični spodbudi, ampak tudi na civilni družbi v razvitih državah in državah v razvoju; meni, da je treba sprožiti kampanje za obveščanje javnosti ter v šolah in na univerzah uvesti izobraževalne programe, ki bodo državljane seznanjali z analizami in ocenami podnebnih sprememb ter ponujali ustrezne rešitve, zlasti kar zadeva spremembo načina življenja za zmanjšanje emisij;
Notes that efforts to combat climate change need to be based not only on political impetus but also on civil society, in both developed and developing countries; considers that public information campaigns should be launched and education programmes in schools and universities adopted both to provide citizens with analyses and evaluations of the state of climate change and to propose appropriate responses, especially in terms of changing lifestyles in order to reduce emissions;
11. poziva Komisijo, naj priskrbi podrobne informacije o sedanjih finančnih mehanizmih za podnebne spremembe in razvoj na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni; poziva jo, naj na podlagi teh informacij nujno predlaga, s katerimi ukrepi bi povečali finančno podporo EU za podnebne spremembe in razvoj ter zagotovili kar najboljšo uskladitev in dopolnjevanje z obstoječimi pobudami;
Calls on the Commission to provide detailed information on existing financial mechanisms for climate change and development at national and international levels; calls on the Commission, based on this information, to urgently propose what measures to use to scale up EU financial support for climate change and development, ensuring the best possible coordination and complementarity with existing initiatives;
13. z zanimanjem sprejema sklepe predsedstva Evropskega sveta 19. in 20. junija 2008 in proračunske posledice, ki jih prinašajo; meni, da so lahko te proračunske zahteve izpolnjene le z uporabo sredstev, ki jih zagotavlja medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
Notes with interest the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council of 19 and 20 June 2008 and their budgetary implications; considers that these budgetary requirements can only be addressed by having recourse to the means provided for by the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
1. ; ponovno poudarja, da morajo za nove naloge biti na voljo nova sredstva;
1. ; underlines once again that new appropriations should be provided for new tasks ;
29. spodbuja Komisijo, naj politični dialog in predvideno skupno izjavo EU/najmanj razvitih držav/majhnih otoških držav v razvoju uporabi kot forum za spodbujanje ideje o „globalni pogodbi“, pri čemer bi bili tesno povezani razvojno sodelovanje in dejavnosti v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami, upoštevana pa tudi zaskrbljenost prebivalstva kot izrecnega elementa, kot je predvideno v pobudi globalnega Marshallovega načrta;
Encourages the Commission to use the policy dialogue and its envisaged EU/Least Developed Countries (LDCs)/Small Island Development States (SIDS) Joint Declaration as a forum for advancing the idea of a "Global Contract", where development cooperation and climate change-related activities are closely integrated with attention to population concerns incorporated as an explicit element, as envisioned in the Global Marshall Plan initiative;
35. poziva Komisijo, naj nameni znatna sredstva raziskavam o ekonomiki prilagoditve v državah v razvoju, vključno z izboljšanjem razumevanja prihodnjih stroškov potrebnega prestrukturiranja trgovinske, kmetijske in varnostne politike ter institucij; priznava, da pomanjkanje znanja na teh področjih ovira učinkovitost dejavnosti prilagajanja ter financiranje javnih in zasebnih udeležencev;
Calls on the Commission to devote significant resources to research on the economics of adaptation in developing countries, including improving understanding of the future costs of the necessary restructuring of trade, agriculture and security policies and institutions; recognises that knowledge gaps in this field constitute a barrier to effective adaptation action and spending from both public and private actors;
37. ponovno poudarja pomen skladnosti politik in poziva Komisijo, naj ob pregledu proračuna EU in ob vmesnem pregledu različnih razvojnih instrumentov obravnava vprašanje vključitve vprašanja podnebnih sprememb v prizadevanja za zmanjševanje revščine.
Reiterates the importance of policy coherence and requests the Commission to address the issue of integrating climate change into poverty reduction efforts at the time of the EU Budget Review as well as the mid-term review of the different development instruments;
45. poziva Komisijo, naj revidira svoj predlog o merilu trajnosti za biogorivo ter uvede strožje zahteve v zvezi s koristmi za podnebje in ekosistem, pri čemer mora upoštevati tudi negativne vplive posredne spremembe rabe zemljišč in posledice za razvoj lokalnih skupnosti; poudarja, da merilo trajnosti ne sme postati nov zaščitni ukrep, ampak ga je treba oblikovati v sodelovanju z državami v razvoju ob upoštevanju njihove primerjalne prednosti v proizvodnji biogoriva in z večjo podporo za krepitev zmogljivosti;
Calls on the Commission to revise its proposal for sustainability criteria for biofuels, establishing stricter requirements for climate and ecosystems benefits, also taking into account the effects of indirect land use change and development consequences for local communities; emphasises that sustainability criteria must not become a new protectionist measure but should be designed in dialogue with developing countries, recognising their comparative advantage in biofuels production, and accompanied by strengthened capacity building support;
48. obžaluje, da bo Komisija šele zdaj pripravila jasne in stroge predloge za prepoved uvoza nezakonito posekanega lesa in lesnih izdelkov na trg EU; poziva Komisijo, naj te predloge nemudoma vloži;
Regrets that the Commission is yet to come forward with clear, rigorous proposals to ban the import of illegally logged timber and timber products into the EU market; calls on the Commission to present such proposals without further delay;
Komisija je predlagala, da se oblikuje globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah med EU ter najmanj razvitimi državami in majhnimi otoškimi državami v razvoju.
The Commission has proposed to launch a Global Climate Change Alliance between the EU and the LDCs (Least Developed Countries) and SIDS (Small Island Developing States).
Njegov cilj je okrepiti zunanje delovanje EU pri skupnih izzivih, ki jih predstavljajo podnebne spremembe in zmanjševanje revščine, ter je korak naprej pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta EU o podnebnih spremembah in razvoju (2004), ki temelji na večjem priznavanju, da morajo podnebne spremembe spremeniti način našega razmišljanja glede razvojne pomoči.
The objective is to strengthen EU external action on the joint challenges of climate change and poverty reduction, and is a step in the implementation of the EU Action Plan on Climate Change and Development (2004), building on an increased recognition that climate change must change the way we think about development aid.
Globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah ima dva glavna namena: spodbujati politični dialog o podnebnih spremembah med EU in državami v razvoju ter olajšati vključevanje skrbi, povezanih s podnebnimi spremembami, v načrte za zmanjšanje revščine na lokalni in nacionalni ravni.
The Global Climate Change Alliance has two main purposes: promoting a political dialogue on climate change between the EU and developing countries, and facilitating the integration of climate change concerns into poverty reduction plans on local and national levels.
Ta cilj globalnega zavezništva o podnebnih spremembah je v sporočilu izrecno obravnavan in razdeljen na pet glavnih področij dela: prilagajanje, blažitev, krčenje gozdov, zmanjševanje tveganja nesreč in vključitev podnebnih sprememb v razvojna prizadevanja.
The latter goal of the GCCA is explicitly dealt with in the Communication by a division into five main areas of work: Adaptation, Mitigation, Deforestation, DRR and Integrating climate change into development efforts.
Komisija je za globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah za obdobje od 2008 do 2010 namenila 60 milijonov s tematskim programom “Okolje in trajnostno upravljanje naravnih virov, vključno z energijo”, ki spada v instrument za razvojno sodelovanje.
The Commission has earmarked €60 million for the GCCA for the period 2008-2010, through the Thematic Program “Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources, including Energy” (ENRTP), which falls under the DCI (Development Cooperation Instrument).
Raziskani bodo tudi drugi viri financiranja iz proračuna EU, desetega evropskega razvojnega sklada in prispevkov držav članic.
Other sources of funding through the EU Budget, the 10th EDF as well as Member State contributions will also be explored.
Začetek globalnega zavezništva o podnebnih spremembah je zelo zaželen iz več razlogov in prihaja ob pravem času.
The launching of the GCCA is much welcome and timely in several ways.
Bistveno je, da se lahko vključi v mednarodna pogajanja o podnebnih spremembah v Poznanju leta 2008 in Köbenhavnu leta 2009.
Significantly, it has a potential to feed into the international climate change negotiations in Poznan 2008 and Copenhagen 2009.
Ena glavnih ovir za sporazum o dogovoru glede podnebnih sprememb po letu 1012 je bilo nezaupanje med industrializiranimi državami in državami v razvoju.
Mistrust between industrialized and developing countries has been one of the main barriers to agreement on a post-2012 climate change deal.
Oblikovanje foruma za dialog med EU in državami v razvoju bi lahko imelo pomembno vlogo pri vzpostavitvi novega zaupanja, če bi EU sočasno prevzela vodilno vlogo na svetovni ravni z splošno ambiciozno strategijo v pogajanjih Združenih narodov o podnebju ter občutno povečala podporo za okrepitev pogajalske moči najmanj razvitih držav in vlad majhnih otoških držav v razvoju.
Establishing a forum for dialogue between the EU and developing countries could play an important role in building new trust - provided that the EU simultaneously takes the lead globally with an overall ambitious strategy in UNFCCC negotiations, as well as substantially increases support to enhance the negotiating capacity of LDC & SIDS governments.
Poleg tega ima globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah potencial, da lahko zapolni ogromno vrzel v razvojnih skupnostih EU in v mednarodnih razvojnih skupnostih: vrzel med znanjem in ukrepanjem.
In addition, the GCCA has the potential of filling a huge gap in EU & international development communities: the gap between knowledge and action.
Kljub večji ozaveščenosti o povezavah med podnebnimi spremembami in razvojem
Despite increased awareness of the linkages between climate change and development
Četrto ocenjevalno poročilo druge delovne skupine Medvladnega foruma o podnebnih spremembah: "Podnebne spremembe 2007: vplivi, prilagajanje in ranljivost"; poročilo razvojnega programa Združenih narodov o človekovem razvoju 2007/2008 z naslovom „Boj proti podnebnim spremembam: človeška solidarnost v razdeljenem svetu“. , nenazadnje na osrednjih področjih, kot so zdravstvo, kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in zmanjševanje tveganja nesreč, ki so odločilna za izpolnitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, se pri razvojnem načrtovanju in porabi ne upoštevajo spremenjene razmere zaradi spreminjanja podnebja.
IPCC WGII Fourth Assessment Report: "Climate Change 2007: Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability"; UNDP Human Development Report 2007/2008 "Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world" - not least in key areas such as health, agriculture, forestry, and DRR, crucial for obtainment of the MDGs - development planning & spending still takes place without much regard to the changed conditions posed by climate change.
Zato obstaja tveganje, da prizadevanja za razvoj in zmanjševanje revščine dolgoročno ne bodo uspešna, kar bo šlo na račun človeških življenj, človekovih pravic, blaginje ter tudi varnosti in stabilnosti.
As a result, development and poverty reduction efforts run the risk of long-term failure, at the expense of human lives, human rights, welfare, as well as peace and stability.
Z razvojem inovativnih in učinkovitih strategij prilagajanja, lahko globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah pomeni nov dosežek v prizadevanjih za vključitev podnebnih sprememb v razvojno pomoč.
By developing innovative and effective adaptation strategies, the GCCA can break new ground in efforts to mainstream climate change into development aid.
V zvezi s tem bi lahko bila njegova pomembna naloga premostitev vrzeli med zmanjševanjem tveganja za nesreče, prilagajanjem in razvojnimi politikami.
In this context, bridging existing gaps between DRR, adaptation and development policies could be an important task for the GCCA.
Z naravnimi nesrečami, ki bodo zaradi podnebnih sprememb verjetno postale številnejše in hujše, se je treba spoprijeti s proaktivnim obvladovanjem tveganja, ne pa v prvi vrsti s humanitarnimi težavami, kot je bila praksa v preteklosti.
Natural hazards, which are likely to become both more frequent and severe as a consequence of climate change, must be tackled from the point of view of pro-active risk management and not primarily, as has been the case in the past, as humanitarian problems.
Nove uspešne strategije na tem področju bi lahko uporabili kot modele ne le za lastno razvojno pomoč Komisije, ampak tudi za države članice in druge donatorje.
New successful strategies in this field could be used as models not only for the Commission’s own development aid, but also for Member States as well as other donors.
Če pa naj bo globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah uspešno, se mora soočiti s številnimi izzivi, ki sedaj onemogočajo učinkovite mednarodne ukrepe za prilagajanje:
However, in order to be successful, the GCCA must confront a number of challenges currently obstructing effective international action on adaptation:
– zaradi zmede na ravni držav v razvoju, pretirane administracije in neučinkovitosti obstaja mnogo pobud za prilagajanje/razvoj na področju podnebnih sprememb;
– There is a plethora of initiatives in the field of climate change adaptation/development, resulting in confusion on the level of developing countries, excessive administration and inefficiency.
– vlade držav donatoric vedno bolj tekmujejo, da bi se izkazale z novimi pobudami oziroma sredstvi za prilagajanje.
– Donor country governments are increasingly competing to make their mark by launching new initiatives/ earmarking money for adaptation – which in itself is positive.
To je samo po sebi pozitivno, vendar pogosto primanjkuje znanja, kako sredstva porabiti, zaradi česar so prizadevanja neusklajena in neučinkovita;
However, often knowledge on how best to spend the money is lacking, leading to uncoordinated and ineffective efforts.
– ne glede na veliko število pobud je finančna vrzel ogromna.
– Despite the large number of initiatives, there is a huge financing gap.
Ocenjeni letni stroški za prilagajanje v državah v razvoju znašajo med 50 in 80 milijard USD.
Estimated annual adaptation costs in developing countries range between 50 and 80 billion USD.
Po pričakovanjih sedanji mehanizmi za financiranje ne bodo ustvarili niti 1 % teh zneskov;
Current funding mechanisms are expected to generate not even 1% of these amounts.
– še vedno nimamo učinkovitih orodij, da bi zagotovili ustrezno financiranje za koristi tropskih gozdov za podnebje, ekosisteme in razvoj, zaradi česar se gozdovi povsod krčijo, kar je z vidika prilagajanja in blažitve ogromen neuspeh;
– We are still lacking effective tools to provide adequate financing for the climate, ecosystem & development benefits provided by the world’s tropical forests, resulting in widespread deforestation, a huge failure from both adaptation and mitigation perspectives.
– primanjkuje nam tudi političnih orodij, s katerimi bi spodbudili in okrepili ukrepe za blažitev v najrevnejših državah.
– We are also lacking policy tools to encourage and strengthen mitigation actions in the poorest countries.
Izkazalo se je, da mehanizmi čistega razvoja za spoprijemanje s posebnimi potrebami najrevnejših držav niso ustrezni, pri običajni pomoči pa vprašanja glede blažitve niso ustrezno upoštevana.
The CDM has proven to be inadequate to address the specific needs of the poorest countries, while conventional aid does not properly take mitigation concerns into account.
Glede na vse to ima lahko globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah bistveno vlogo zlasti na naslednjih področjih:
Against this background, the GCCA has a potential of playing a key role specifically in the following fields:
– kot “klirinška hiša” in s spodbujanjem sodelovanja in usklajevanja med Komisijo, državami članicami in drugimi pobudami za prilagajanje oziroma zmanjševanje tveganj za nesreče;
– Being a “Clearing house” and promoting collaboration and coordination between Commission, MS and other adaptation/DRR initiatives.
– s pridobivanjem finančne in politične podpore za prilagajanje oziroma zmanjševanje tveganj za nesreče kot nujnega elementa v prihodnjem režimu podnebnih sprememb po letu 2012;
– Mobilizing financial and political support for adaptation/DRR, as an indispensable element of a future post-2012 climate change regime.
– s sprožitvijo inovativne, na programu temelječe, podpore za prilagajanje oziroma zmanjševanje tveganja za nesreče, s poudarkom zlasti na krepitvi vladnih struktur najmanj razvitih držav in majhnih otoških držav v razvoju na makroravni, ter z vzpostavitvijo vezi z nacionalne ravni do prizadevanj za razvijanje zmogljivosti v lokalnih skupnostih;
– Launching innovative program-based support for adaptation/DRR, focusing specifically on strengthening LDC & SIDS macro-level governance structures, and establishing links from the national level to capacity building efforts in local communities.
– s pospešenim preverjanjem razvojne pomoči držav članic in Komisije z vidika podnebja in zmanjševanja tveganja za nesreče ter z razvijanjem in razširjanjem nove metodologije na tem področju;
– Speeding up climate & DRR screening of MS & Commission development aid and developing and spreading new methodologies in this field.
– z vlaganjem v razvoj inovativnih modelov javno-zasebnih partnerstev na osrednjih področjih za prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam in zmanjšanje tveganja nesreč;
– Investing in development of innovative Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) models in key areas for climate change adaptation and DRR.
– z raziskovanjem in razvijanjem dodatnih mehanizmov za prenos tveganja, pri čemer je eden pomembnih ciljev, da se pri večjih katastrofah ljudem pomaga normalizirati razmere;
– Exploring and developing further risk transfer mechanisms, one important objective being to help bring people back to normal in the context of major disasters.
– s prispevanjem k združitvi agende za zmanjšanje revščine in prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam na mednarodni ter nacionalni in lokalni ravni.
– Contributing to the merging of the poverty reduction and climate change adaptation agendas, on international as well as national and local levels.
Na vseh izpostavljenih področjih je bistveno, da globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah dopolnjuje, ne le posnema delo drugih akterjev na tem področju.
In all the outlined areas, it is crucial that the GCCA is complementary – and not a copy – of what other actors in the field are already doing.
Tu je razlika med politično privlačnim “oblikovanjem ločene identitete” in nekoliko manj glamuroznim “dopolnjevanjem in usklajevanjem že obstoječih pobud”.
There is a distinction between the politically attractive “creating a separate identity” and the slightly less glamorous “complementing & coordinating already existing initiatives”.
Komisije ne sme tako prevzeti prva možnost, da bi pozabila pomen druge.
The Commission should not be so enticed by the former so as to forget the importance of the latter.
Vendar ima lahko globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah tudi pomembno vlogo z razvijanjem politike prilagajanja oziroma zmanjševanja tveganje za nesreče in metodologij, kjer sedaj obstajajo vrzeli.
However, the GCCA can also potentially play an important role by developing adaptation/DRR policy and methodologies where gaps currently exist.
Poleg zgoraj navedenih usmerjenih ukrepov kot ključnih področij za globalno zavezništvo o podnebnih spremembah mora Komisija nujno razviti ambiciozne dopolnile pobude, zlasti kar zadeva sodelovanje na področju gozdarstva in tehnologije, kjer finančne potrebe zelo presegajo sedanja namenska sredstva v okviru globalnega zavezništva o podnebnih spremembah.
In addition to the focused actions identified above as key areas for the GCCA, the Commission must urgently develop ambitious complementary initiatives, particularly in the fields of forestry and technology cooperation, where financial needs widely exceed what is provided for within the GCCA at current.
Prav je povedati, da so, čeprav se omejimo na zgoraj predvideni skrčeni sklop ciljev, sredstva, namenjena globalnemu zavezništvu o podnebnih spremembah, doslej veliko preskromna.
It is fair to say that even when reduced to the limited set of objectives envisioned above, resources devoted to the GCCA so far are woefully inadequate.
Če naj bo uspešno, mu mora Komisija nameniti veliko več sredstev.
In order to be successful, the Commission must commit funding at a much larger scale.
Odgovornost za finančno prispevanje pa nosijo tudi države članice, ki so do sedaj v celoti prispevale le 5,5 milijonov EUR.
The responsibility to contribute financially however also lies on Member States, so far contributing only €5.5 million in total.
Za začetek bi bil bistven dolgoročni finančni cilj, da bi poudarili razširjeno osredotočenost in pomen globalnega zavezništva o podnebnih spremembah.
To begin with, a long-term financing goal will be crucial to emphasize the extended focus and relevance of the GCCA.