natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1337/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne16. decembra 2008 o ustanovitvi instrumenta za hitro odzivanje na hitro naraščajoče cene hrane v državah v razvoju
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1337/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 establishing a facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta z dne 29. in 30. oktobra 2009 (Dok.
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council of 29-30 October 2009 (Doc.
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta o organizaciji in delovanju Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje z dne 26. julija 2010
– having regard to the Council Decision of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (EEAS)
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. oktobra 2010 o pregledu proračuna EU ( KOM(2010)0700 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 19 October 2010 on the ‘EU Budget Review’ ( COM(2010)0700 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. oktobra 2010 o prihodnosti proračunske podpore EU za trete države ( KOM(2010)0586 ),
– having regard to the Green Paper from the Commission of 19 October 2010 on ‘The future of EU budget support to third countries’ ( COM(2010)0586 ),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 10. novembra 2010 z naslovom Razvojna politika v podporo vključujoči rasti in trajnostnemu razvoju: povečevanje učinka razvojne politike EU ( KOM(2010)0629 ),
– having regard to the Green Paper from the Commission of 10 November 2010 on ‘EU development policy in support of inclusive growth and sustainable development: Increasing the impact of EU development policy’ ( COM(2010)0629 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. julija 2007 o demokratičnem nadzoru pri izvajanju instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja
– having regard to its resolution of 12 July 2007 on the democratic scrutiny of the implementation of the financing instrument for development cooperation (DCI)
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2007 o osnutku Odločbe Komisije o vzpostavitvi posebnega ukrepa za Irak za leto 2007
– having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2007 on the draft Commission decision establishing a Special Measure 2007 for Iraq
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. marca 2007 o organih lokalne skupnosti in razvojnem sodelovanju
– having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2007 on local authorities and development cooperation
– ob upoštevanju strukturiranega dialoga, ki ga je leta 2010 začela Komisija s ciljem vključiti organizacije civilne družbe in lokalne oblasti v razvojno sodelovanje ES,
– having regard to the Structured Dialogue launched in 2010 by the Commission with the aim to involve civil society organisations (CSOs) and local authorities (LAs) in EC development cooperation,
– ob upoštevanju svoje zakonodajne resolucije z dne 3. februarja 2011 o stališču Sveta v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja
– having regard to its legislative resolution of 3 February 2011 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0032 . ,
Texts adopted P7_TA(2011)0032 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje zakonodajne resolucije z dne 3. februarja 2011 o stališču Sveta v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1905/2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja
– having regard to its legislative resolution of 3 February 2011 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0030 . ,
Texts adopted P7_TA(2011)0030 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje zakonodajne resolucije z dne 3. februarja 2011 o stališču Sveta v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1934/2006 o oblikovanju instrumenta za financiranje sodelovanja z industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom
– having regard to its legislative resolution of 3 February 2011 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1934/2006 establishing a financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0033 . ,
Texts adopted P7_TA(2011)0033 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ( A7-0187/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A7-0187/2011 ),
A. ker je v skladu s členom 2(1) instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje najpomembnejši cilj sodelovanja na podlagi tega instrumenta izkoreninjenje revščine v partnerskih državah, vključno z izpolnitvijo razvojnih ciljev tisočletja,
A. whereas, according to Article 2(1) of the DCI, the overarching objective of cooperation under that instrument is ‘the eradication of poverty in partner countries’, including ‘pursuit of the Millennium Development Goals’ (MDGs),
B. ker morajo v skladu s členom 2(4) instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje vsi ukrepi iz geografskih programov in 90 % odhodkov, predvidenih v tematskih programih, izpolnjevati merila za uradno razvojno pomoč, ki jih je opredelil OECD/DAC,
B. whereas, according to Article 2(4) of the DCI, all the measures under geographic programmes and 90% of the expenditure foreseen under thematic programmes must fulfil the criteria for Official Development Assistance (ODA) established by the OECD/DAC,
C. ker po izračunih Komisije samo 0,2 % obveznosti, ki se financirajo iz tematskih programov instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje za obdobje od 2007 do 2009, ne izpolnjuje zahtev za uradno razvojno pomoč;
C. whereas according to Commission calculations, only 0.2 % of the commitments financed under the DCI thematic programmes between 2007 and 2009 do not fulfil the ODA criteria,
E. ker se je v skladu s skupno izjavo o demokratičnem nadzoru in skladnosti pri zunanjem delovanju in izjavah Komisije o demokratičnem nadzoru in skladnosti pri zunanjem delovanju, priloženih k medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, Komisija zavezala, „da bo pri izvajanju teh strategij ustrezno upoštevala stališče Evropskega parlamenta“,
E. whereas, in accordance with the joint Declaration on Democratic Scrutiny and Coherence of External Actions and the Commission Declaration on Democratic Scrutiny and Coherence of External Actions attached to the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, the Commission committed itself ‘to take due account of the position of the European Parliament when implementing the strategies’,
F. ker načela prevzemanja odgovornosti, sodelovanja in dobrega upravljanja predvidevajo pristop z več udeleženci, v okviru katerega različni razvojni partnerji, tj. lokalne oblasti ali nedržavni akterji, delujejo na dopolnilen in skladen način; in ker je pomembno jasno razlikovati med posebno vlogo lokalnih oblasti in nedržavnih akterjev, in sicer z vidika njihovih področij pristojnosti, legitimnosti in demokratičnega nadzora, izkušenj na področju upravljanja lokalnih zadev ter vključevanja v izvajanje javnih politik;
F. whereas the principles of ownership, participation and good governance call for a multi-stakeholder approach in which the various development partners, i.e. local authorities or non-state actors, act in a complementary and coherent manner; and whereas it is important, however, to make a clear distinction between the specific role of local authorities and that of non-state actors, in terms of their spheres of competence, legitimacy and democratic control, experience in the management of local affairs and involvement in the implementation of public policies,
G. ker finančna sredstva EU za mednarodno sodelovanje z Afriko izhajajo iz štirih geografskih instrumentov: Evropskega razvojnega sklada za afriške, karibske in pacifiške države, sporazuma o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju za Južno Afriko, Evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta za pet severnoafriških držav ter instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje za tematske programe;
G. whereas EU funding for international cooperation with Africa comes from four geographic instruments: the EDF for African ACP countries, the TDCA for South Africa, the ENPI for five North African states, and the DCI for the thematic programmes,
H. ker se je Komisija zavezala, da bo do leta 2009 kar 20 % pomoči iz instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje, ki jo dodeli po programih za posamezne države, namenjenih osnovnošolskemu in srednješolskemu izobraževanju ter osnovnemu zdravstvu prek projektne, programske ali proračunske podpore za te sektorje, ki bo geografsko enakomerno porazdeljena,
H. whereas the Commission undertook to endeavour to ensure that 20% of its allocated assistance under country programmes covered by the DCI would be dedicated, by 2009, to basic and secondary education and basic health, through project, programme or budget support linked to these sectors, taking an average across all geographic areas,
I. ker se je EU zavezala skupnemu cilju, da bo do leta 2015 porabila 0,7 % bruto nacionalnega dohodka za uradno razvojno pomoč,
I. whereas the EU has committed itself to the collective target of spending 0.7% of its gross national income (GNI) on ODA by 2015,
K. ker člen 290 PDEU določa, da se v zakonodajnem aktu lahko na Komisijo prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje nezakonodajnih aktov, ki se splošno uporabljajo in dopolnjujejo ali spreminjajo nekatere nebistvene elemente zakonodajnega akta,
K. whereas Article 290 of the TFEU states that a legislative act may delegate to the Commission the power to adopt non-legislative acts of general application to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of the legislative act,
3. obžaluje, da Komisija ni dovolj upoštevala večine vprašanj, ki jih je med postopkom demokratičnega nadzora o osredotočenosti na revščino in razvojne cilje tisočletja zastavil Parlament;
Finds it regrettable that several of Parliament’s concerns raised during the democratic scrutiny process, in particular regarding a lack of focus on poverty and the MDGs, have not been sufficiently taken into account by the Commission;
6. obžaluje, da se je Komisija na resolucije Parlamenta, v katerih ta opozarja na nespoštovanje meril za dodelitev uradne razvojne pomoči iz člena 2(4) te uredbe, odzvala tako, da je spremenila ali umaknila le tri od enajstih osnutkov zadevnih izvedbenih ukrepov;
Finds it regrettable that, in response to its resolutions highlighting non-observance of the requirement laid down in Article 2(4) of the regulation to fulfil the ODA eligibility criteria, the Commission amended or withdrew only three of 11 draft implementing measures concerned;
Obeti za prihodnost: načela
Perspectives for the future: principles
Glej OECD/DAC: Smernice za poročanje v sistemu za poročanje držav upnic. ; poziva, naj bodo kvote uradne razvojne pomoči za tematske programe strožje od kvot sedanjega instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje, zlasti za tematske programe o „migracijah in azilu“, pri katerih Komisija ni jasno pokazala, kako dejavnosti, ki se financirajo v okviru mejnih kontrol, izpolnjujejo merila OECD/DAC za uradno razvojno pomoč;
See OECD/DAC: ‘Reporting Directives for the Creditor Reporting System’. , must remain a condition for all measures to be funded as part of geographic programmes under the new instrument; calls for a more stringent ODA quota for thematic programmes than under the current DCI, especially for programmes on ‘migration and asylum’, in respect of which the Commission did not demonstrate clearly how activities funded in the context of border controls are eligible as ODA according to the OECD/DAC criteria;
17. se strinja, da je treba uporabiti različen pristop do različnih skupin držav v razvoju? in da bi lahko tradicionalna finančna pomoč postala manj pomembna za države v vzponu; meni, da bi se morala pomoč za države v vzponu poleg spodbujanja trajnostne gospodarske rasti še vedno osredotočati na krepitev davčne politike partnerskih držav in spodbujanje uporabe domačega prihodka, zaradi česar bi se morali zmanjšati revščina in odvisnost od pomoči;
Agrees that a differentiated approach to the diverse group of developing countries is needed, and that traditional financial aid may become less relevant for emerging countries; considers that aid for emerging countries, while promoting sustainable economic growth, should still focus on reinforcing the partner country ’ s fiscal policy and promoting mobilisation of domestic revenue which should lead to the reduction of poverty and of aid dependency ;
24. poudarja, da morata Komisija Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje vzdrževati reden in strukturiran dialog z nedržavnimi akterji in lokalnimi organi o pripravi, izvajanju in vrednotenju strateških dokumentov; zato poudarja, da je treba sklepe strukturiranega dialoga upoštevati v prihodnjih finančnih instrumentih;
Underlines the need for a regular and structured dialogue between the Commission, the EEAS, non-state actors (NSAs) and local authorities (LAs) on the programming, implementation and evaluation of strategy papers; emphasises therefore the need to take the conclusions of the Structured Dialogue into account in future financial instruments;
26. meni, da bi moral novi instrument za razvojno sodelovanje služiti kot podlaga za ciljno in prožnejšo pomoč v kriznih razmerah; je prepričan, da bo nova finančna struktura pomagala zagotoviti povezavo dejavnosti pomoči, obnove in razvoja (LRRD) s prožnostjo in dopolnjevanjem mehanizmov financiranja;
Considers that the new development cooperation instrument should provide a basis for targeted and more flexible aid to situations of fragility; believes that the new financial architecture should help to ensure proper linkage of relief, rehabilitation and development (LRRD) through flexibility and complementarity of the funding mechanisms;
Obeti za prihodnost: geografski in tematski programi
Perspectives for the future: geographic and thematic programmes
29. priznava pomembno vlogo civilne družbe pri razvoju, na primer vlogo nadzornika vlade, ki zagotavlja odgovornost slednje, in poziva, naj se civilni družbi v državah v razvoju zagotovi ustrezno financiranje;
Recognises the important roles that civil society plays in development, such as acting as a watchdog in relation to government to ensure accountability, and calls for adequate funding to be directed towards civil society in developing countries;
34. je prepričan, da bi moral novi instrument zagotoviti različen pristop za financiranje organizacij civilne družbe in lokalnih oblasti ter preprečiti nesmiselno tekmovalnost med njimi; poudarja, da je treba obravnavati problem prevelikega števila vlog v sedanjem programu; poziva, naj se rezultati strukturiranega dialoga v celoti odrazijo v prihodnjem tematskem programu in predlagani obliki pomoči;
Believes that the new instrument should provide for a differentiated approach to funding for civil society organisations and local authorities, and also avoid pointless competition between the two types of actor; stresses the need to address the problem of the current programme’s over-subscription; calls for the results of the Structured Dialogue to be fully reflected in the future thematic programme and the proposed aid modalities;
37. poudarja, da za instrument za razvojno sodelovanje v celoti velja člen 290 PDEU, zato poudarja, da je za sklepe, ki izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 290 PDEU, vključno z opredelitvijo splošnih ciljev, prednostnih nalog, pričakovanih rezultatov in dodeljevanje sredstev obvezna uporaba postopka v zvezi z delegiranimi akti;
Reiterates that Article 290 TFEU is fully applicable to the DCI, and therefore emphasises that application of the delegated acts procedure is compulsory for those decisions which fulfil the criteria of Article 290 TFEU, including on the establishment of general objectives, priorities, expected results and financial allocations;
Leto 2011 je odločilen trenutek za upoštevanje preteklih izkušenj iz štirih let uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja (instrument za razvojno sodelovanje).
2011 is a strategic moment to draw the lessons from four years of operation of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation (DCI).
Komisija je naznanila, da bo svoje predloge za večletni finančni okvir za obdobje po letu 2013 predstavila pred poletnim premorom in zakonodajne predloge za instrumente za financiranje zunanjega delovanja v nadaljevanju letošnjega leta.
The Commission has announced that it will present its proposals for the post-2013 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) before the summer recess and the legislative proposals for the financing instruments for external action later this year.
Namen tega poročila je že v začetni fazi oblikovati stališče Parlamenta o novem instrumentu za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja EU, ki bo temeljilo na izkušnjah, ki jih je Parlament pridobil pri nadzoru uporabe instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
The purpose of this report is to establish at an early stage Parliament's position with regard to a new financing instrument for EU development cooperation, based on the lessons drawn from our scrutiny of the implementation of the DCI.
Pridobljena spoznanja
Lessons learned
Odbor za razvoj Evropskega parlamenta je po začetku veljavnosti instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje ustanovil štiri stalne delovne skupine (sedaj jih je pet), ki uresničujejo pravico Parlamenta do nadzora nad vsemi glavnimi programski dokumenti, ki jih predlaga Komisija.
Following the entry into force of the DCI, the European Parliament’s Committee on Development established four (now five) permanent working groups to exercise Parliament's right of scrutiny over all major programming documents proposed by the Commission.
Ta proces je privedel do trajnega, strukturiranega in poglobljenega dialoga med Odborom za razvoj in službami Komisije ter vzpostavil koristen učni proces za obe instituciji: spoznali smo težave, s katerimi se srečuje Komisija pri načrtovanju programov, in poročevalec izraža upanje, da se tudi Komisija bolj zaveda praktičnega pomena Parlamenta pri demokratičnem nadzoru ter da je bolje seznanjena z našimi metodami dela.
The process led to a sustained and structured in-depth dialogue between DEVE and the Commission, and constituted a useful learning process for both institutions: we learned about the difficulties faced by the Commission during programming, and your rapporteur hopes that the Commission also became more aware of the practical meaning of Parliament’s democratic scrutiny and our working methods.
Dialog je bil sicer konstruktiven in Komisija je delovne skupine prizadevno obveščala o upoštevanju priporočil Parlamenta, žal pa to Komisije ni prepričalo, da bi upoštevala številne zahteve odbora ter številne resolucije, ki jih je sprejel Parlament
While the dialogue was constructive, and the Commission made great efforts to inform the working groups about the follow-up to Parliament's recommendations, regrettably it did not induce the Commission to heed many of our Committee's requests nor the resolutions adopted by Parliament
Odbor je v skladu s členom 81 poslovnika Parlamenta oblikoval pet resolucij, sprejetih na plenarnem zasedanju, s katerimi je Komisiji sporočil, da je v 11 osnutkih dokumentov prekoračila svoja izvedbena pooblastila.
The committee produced five resolutions adopted by plenary under Rule 81 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, signalling to the Commission that in 11 draft measures the Commission had exceeded its implementing powers.
Samo v treh primerih je Komisija spremenila ali umaknila svoj osnutek sklepa. ; Stališča Parlamenta so se le občasno upoštevala v osnutkih izvedbenih ukrepov, ki jih je Komisija predložila upravnemu odboru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
Only in three cases, however, did the Commission adapt or withdraw its draft decision. ; Parliament's position was only sporadically reflected in the draft implementing measures the Commission submitted to the DCI Management Committee.
Razočaralo nas je tudi, da obsežno delo, ki ga je Parlament opravil pri tem nadzoru, ni bilo deležno odziva predstavnikov držav članic v odboru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
We were also disappointed to see that the substantive scrutiny work carried out by Parliament did not receive any echo from the representatives of the Member States in the DCI Committee.
V nasprotju s Parlamentom se države članice niso osredotočale na preverjanje, ali so predlogi Komisije skladni z zakonodajnimi določbami iz instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje (zlasti glede zahteve za skladnost z uradno razvojno pomočjo).
Contrary to Parliament, Member States did not seem to focus on checking the compliance of Commission proposals with the legal provisions of the DCI (in particular the ODA-compatibility requirement).
Osrednja težava, ki smo jo ugotovili v našem dialogu, je očitno težava pri razumevanju oz. sprejemanju specifične vloge razvojnega sodelovanja v smislu zunanjega delovanja EU.
The main problem which emerged from our dialogue seems to be a difficulty in understanding or accepting the specific role of development cooperation in the context of the EU's external action.
To je razumljivo, saj je bil naš glavni partner v Komisiji GD RELEX, katerega osrednja naloga je uveljavljati interese EU v svetu.
This is understandable: our main partner in the Commission was DG RELEX, which had as its main mandate the promotion of EU interests in the rest of the world.
Nekoliko drugače je treba razmišljati in razumeti, da je razvojno sodelovanje edina politika zunanjega delovanja (poleg humanitarne pomoči), ki ni namenjena interesom EU, pač pa za obrambo interesov najbolj marginaliziranih in ranljivih prebivalcev na planetu: za zmanjševanje revščine ter trajnosten človeški, družbeni in gospodarski razvoj – skratka za pravico do dostojnega življenja za vse.
A mental adaptation is required to understand that development cooperation is the one policy area of external action (besides humanitarian aid) which has not been designed to serve EU interests, but to defend the interests of the most marginalized and vulnerable populations of this planet: Poverty alleviation, sustainable human, social and economic development - in short: the right to a decent life for all.
Težava pri prepoznavanju različnih in specifičnih nalog naše razvojne politike in njihovem pretvarjanju v oprijemljive programe in ukrepe je bila jasno razvidna iz nekaterih programskih dokumentov, ki jih je Komisija izdala v okviru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
The difficulty in recognising the different and specific mandate of our development policy and translating it into concrete programmes and measures was apparent in some of the programming documents issued by the Commission under the DCI.
Zato niso usmerjeni v odpravljanje revščine v okviru trajnostnega razvoja in razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, ki so v instrumentu za razvojno sodelovanje navedeni kot prvi in splošni cilj.
They therefore lack the clear focus on poverty eradication in the context of sustainable development and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) which is the primary and overarching objective of the DCI.
Parlament je zato pozval k instrumentu, ki bi EU omogočil financiranje tovrstnih ukrepov tudi iz drugih virov, ne samo iz instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
Parliament therefore called for an instrument which would enable the EU to finance such actions from sources other than the DCI.