natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zahteva tudi, da se poračuni sprejemajo z zakonskimi akti ter da se davki, pristojbine in druga plačila zbirajo na podlagi pravnih aktov.
It also requires that budgets be adopted by means of legal acts, and that taxes, charges and other payments be levied based on legal acts.
c) Delitev funkcij na področju finančnih dejavnosti med zakonodajno in izvršno oblastjo , ki je pretežno vključena v ustavno pravo.
c) The division of functions in the field of financial activities between the legislative and executive powers, enshrined mainly in constitutional law.
d) Javna narava in preglednost finančnih dejavnosti države in samoupravnih organov se utemeljuje z dejstvom, da gre za sredstva, ki se zbirajo od državljanov in podjetij.
d) The public nature and transparency of the financial activities of the State and of the self-governing bodies is justified by the fact that funds collected from citizens and companies are concerned.
Uporaba teh sredstev mora biti pod nadzorom javnosti.
Their use needs to be subjected to public scrutiny.
V zvezi s tem pozdravljam evropsko pobudo za preglednost kot korak v pravo smer, zlasti kar zadeva obveznost držav članic, da objavijo imena upravičencev do sredstev iz proračuna EU, kar sedaj določa člen 53b(2)(d) finančne uredbe.
In this context, I welcome the European Transparency Initiative as a step in a right direction, mainly with regard to the Member States’ obligation to publish the beneficiaries of funds deriving from the EU budget, now enshrined in Article 53b(2)(d) of the Financial Regulation.
e) Sodelovanje državljanov pri finančnih dejavnostih države in samoupravnih organov , na primer s pravico, da na javno upravo naslavljajo predloge, zahteve in pritožbe.
e) The citizens’ participation in the financial activities of the State and of the self-governing bodies, for example through the right to make proposals, requests and complaints to the public administration.
f) Finančno načrtovanje kot načelo pomeni, da se dejavnosti države in samoupravnih organov, ki so povezane z zbiranjem, razdeljevanjem in uporabo javnih sredstev, izvajajo v skladu z njihovimi finančnimi načrti.
f) Financial planning as a principle means that the activities of the State and of the self-governing bodies related to the collection, distribution and use of public funds are carried out in accordance with their respective financial plans.
Ta temeljna načela je treba uporabljati pri vsakodnevnem upravljanju javnih financ, da se zagotovi gospodarna, učinkovito in uspešna poraba javnih sredstev.
The above fundamental principles must be implemented in the day-to-day management of public finance, in order to ensure that public funds be used economically, efficiently and effectively.
Natančneje, dobro finančno upravljanje vključuje:
To be more precise, sound financial management involves:
- jasno določene cilje,
- clearly set objectives,
- prepoznavanje in analizo finančnih tveganj in sprejetje ukrepov za njihovo odpravo,
- identification and analysis of financial risks and the adoption of measures aimed at their elimination,
- določitev odgovornosti tistih, ki nosijo finančno odgovornost,
- the allocation of responsibilities of those that have financial responsibilities,
- visokokakovostna informacijska tehnologija, jasna pravila o notranjem in zunanjem obveščanju,
- high quality IT, clear rules on internal and external communication,
- stalno izboljševanje kakovosti vodstvenega dela,
- continuous quality improvement of managerial work,
- stalne naložbe v strokovno usposabljanje zaposlenih,
- continuous investment in the professional training of staff,
- nedvoumna, enostavna in sodobna pravna pravila, ki odražajo najboljše prakse v mednarodnem merilu,
- unambiguous, simple and modern legal rules, reflecting international best practices,
- visokokakovostno poročanje,
- high quality reporting,
- učinkoviti mehanizmi notranjega nadzora in notranje revizije, ki delujejo preventivno, in
- effective internal control and internal audit mechanisms acting preventively, and
- uporaba ugotovitev in priporočil zunanje revizije.
- making use of external audit findings and recommendations.
Zavedam se dejstva, da glavno politično odgovornost glede javnih financ EU nosijo Komisija, Svet in Parlament.
I am mindful of the fact that the main political responsibility in the field of EU public finance lies with the Commission, the Council and Parliament.
Ta odgovornost se izraža skozi celoten proračunski postopek, ne le pri pripravi in sprejetju proračuna, temveč tudi pri njegovem izvrševanju, nadaljnjem spremljanju in nadzoru.
This responsibility is expressed in the whole budgetary process, not only in the drawing up and the adoption of the budget, but also in its implementation, follow-up, and control.
Zame bi bila velika čast, če bi imel možnost sodelovati pri teh postopkih kot član Računskega sodišča.
It would be a great honour for me to be able to participate in this process as a Member of the Court of Auditors.
Jasno je, da mora Računsko sodišče, če hoče ustrezno in učinkovito opravljati svoje naloge, ostati povsem neodvisno od drugih institucij, obenem pa mora nenehno ohranjati stike z njimi.
It is obvious that, if the Court of Auditors is to carry out its tasks properly and efficiently, it must remain completely independent from the other institutions, while, at the same time, maintaining continuous contacts with them.
Prepričan sem, da bi bila moja neodvisna strokovna stališča koristna tako za Sodišče kot za Parlament.
I trust that my independent professional views would be a valuable resource to both the Court and Parliament.
Moje dolžnosti poročanja bi razdelil na dve različni kategoriji:
I would divide my reporting duties into two different categories:
a) moje „predpisane“ dolžnosti do Parlamenta, in sicer dolžnosti, ki izhajajo iz Pogodbe, uredb, poslovnika itd.
a) My ‘statutory’ duties vis-à-vis Parliament, namely the duties resulting from the Treaty, regulations, rules of procedure etc.
Moja naloga bo dejavno sodelovati pri ukrepih, ki Parlamentu omogočajo dati razrešnico Komisiji glede izvrševanja proračuna.
My mission will be to actively participate in measures enabling Parliament to give a discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget.
V skladu s členom 319(1) Pogodbe o delovanju EU Svet in Parlament – poleg drugih dokumentov – pregledata letno poročilo Računskega sodišča in njegova posebna poročila, h katerim bom sam prispeval.
According to Article 319(1) TFEU, the Council and Parliament shall examine, among other documents, the Court’s annual report and its special reports, to which I will contribute.
Finančna uredba v členih 143 in 144 vsebuje določbe o predložitvi poročil Parlamentu.
The Financial Regulation contains in Articles 143 and 144 the provisions concerning the submission of reports to Parliament.
Sodeloval bom tudi pri ustreznih sejah Odbora za proračunski nadzor, na katerih bodo predstavljena omenjena poročila;
I will also take part in relevant meetings of the Committee on Budgetary Control, at which the above reports will be presented.
b) pobude in neformalne dejavnosti – enemu od članov mojega kabineta bi zaupal nalogo stalnega spremljanja dnevnega reda in dokumentov Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter priprave ustreznih zapisnikov, informativnih beležk in predlogov za moje lastno delo ter za delo Sodišča.
b) Initiative and informal activities – I would entrust one of the members of my cabinet to regularly monitor the agenda and the documents of the Committee on Budgetary Control, and to prepare appropriate minutes, information notes and suggestions for my own work as well as for the Court's work.
Na splošno bi omenjene dejavnosti opravljal z namenom doseganja dveh glavnih ciljev iz revizijske strategije Sodišča za obdobje 2009-2012, in sicer za
Overall, I would carry out the above activities with a view to achieving the two main objectives of the Court’s Audit Strategy 2009-2012, namely to:
a) izboljšanje splošnega vpliva revizij in
a) maximise the overall impact of audits, and
b) povečanje učinkovitosti z najboljšim izkoristkom sredstev.
b) increase efficiency by making the best use of resources.
Kot izrednemu profesorju finančnega prava bi se mi zdelo tudi zelo zanimivo sodelovati pri oblikovanju mnenj Sodišča o osnutku finančnih pravil EU, na primer v povezavi s sedanjo (po drugem triletju) revizijo finančne uredbe in njenih izvedbenih pravil.
Also, as associated professor of financial law, I would find it most interesting to take part in the formulation of the Court’s opinions on EU draft financial rules, for example, in the context of the ongoing second triennial review of the Financial Regulation and its Implementing Rules.
Predlog Komisije, ki je predviden v sredini leta 2010, bi moral odražati tudi ugotovitve iz letnega poročila Sodišča za leto 2008 glede visokega števila napak na skoraj vseh področjih odhodkov EU.
The Commission’s proposal, due in mid-2010, should also reflect the findings in the Court’s Annual Report 2008 concerning the high number of errors in almost all areas of EU expenditure.
Ravno tako bi si želel sodelovati pri razpravah o konceptu „dopustnega tveganja napake“, pri čemer obenem poudarjam nujnost ohranjanja politike popolnega nepopuščanja glede goljufij
I would also like to take part in discussions concerning the concept of a ‘tolerable risk of error’, while stressing at the same time the necessity to maintain the policy of zero-tolerance of fraud.
Na primer, Oddelek 1 odgovora Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic na posvetovanja o reviziji finančne uredbe
For example, Section 1 of the European Ombudsman’s response to the consultation on the review of the Financial Regulation
Kakšna je po vašem mnenju dodana vrednost revizije smotrnosti poslovanja in kako je treba revizijske ugotovitve vključiti v upravljanje?
What do you think is the added value of performance audit and how should the findings be incorporated in the management?
Prepričan sem, da dodana vrednost revizije smotrnosti poslovanja – v primerjavi s finančno revizijo – izhaja iz značilnosti in obsega tovrstne revizije.
I believe that the added value of performance audit results from the characteristic features and the scope of this type of audit, as compared with the financial audit.
Finančna revizija je pristojna za pregledovanje računov, pa tudi zakonitosti in pravilnosti rabe javnih sredstev.
The remit of financial audit is to examine the accounts as well as the legality and regularity in the use of public funds.
V skladu z deklaracijo iz Lime, na katero se sklicujem v odgovoru na tretje vprašanje, se revizija smotrnosti poslovanja osredotoča na pregledovanje smotrnosti poslovanja, gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti javne uprave.
According to the Lima Declaration, to which I referred in my answer to question 3, performance audit is oriented towards the examination of performance, economy, efficiency and effectiveness of public administration.
Ne zajema zgolj določenih finančnih operacij, temveč celo vrsto vladnih dejavnosti, vključno z organizacijskimi in upravnimi sistemi.
It covers not only specific financial operations, but the full range of government activities, including both organisational and administrative systems.
Revizija smotrnosti poslovanja torej pomaga zagotoviti, da se javna sredstva porabijo pametno, pozitivno vlogo pa igra tudi s tem, ko dejavno pokaže, katera področja upravljanja javnih sredstev bi bilo mogoče izboljšati in kako.
Performance audit thus helps ensure that public funds are spent wisely, and plays a positive role by proactively showing which areas of management of public resources could be improved and how.
V oddelku 1.2.1 Priročnika Sodišča za revizijo smotrnosti poslovanja je navedeno, da gre pri reviziji smotrnosti poslovanja za revizijo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, in sicer za revizijo gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti Komisije in/ali drugih revidiranih organov pri uporabi sredstev EU za izvajanje njihovih nalog.
According to section 1.2.1 of the Court's Performance Audit Manual, performance audit is an audit of sound financial management, namely the audit of the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which the Commission and/or other audited entities have used EU funds in carrying out their responsibilities.
Kar zadeva vključevanje ugotovitev revizije v upravljanje bi se oprl na člen 27(3) finančne uredbe.
As regards the incorporation of the findings within management, I would use Article 27(3) of the Financial Regulation as a point of reference.
Ta določa, da se za vse sektorje dejavnosti, ki jih zajema proračun, določijo specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, ustrezni in časovno opredeljeni cilji.
It stipulates that specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed objectives shall be set for all sectors of activity covered by the budget.
Njihovo izpolnjevanje se spremlja s kazalniki uspešnosti za vsako dejavnost.
Their achievement shall be monitored by performance indicators for each activity.
Menim, da ugotovitve in priporočila iz letnih in posebnih poročil Računskega sodišča predstavljajo koristen vir za vodstvene delavce pri določanju omenjenih ciljev.
I consider that the observations and recommendations contained in the Court's annual reports and special reports represent a valuable resource for managers in setting the above objectives.
Ugotovitve revizije smotrnosti poslovanja torej pomagajo izboljšati kakovost in pravilnost upravljanja s sredstvi EU.
The findings of performance audit will thus help raise the quality and soundness of the management of EU funds.
Kot nakazujejo smernice za izvajanje revizije smotrnosti poslovanja Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizorskih institucij, lahko to navsezadnje okrepi legitimnost in odgovornost ter zaupanje državljanov v EU in njene institucije.
As the INTOSAI’s Implementation Guidelines for Performance Auditing suggest, this may, ultimately, strengthen the legitimacy, accountability, and the citizens' trust in the EU and its institutions.
Kako bi lahko izboljšali sodelovanje med Računskim sodiščem, nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi in Evropskim parlamentom (Odborom za proračunski nadzor) v zvezi z revizijo proračuna EU?
How could the cooperation improve between the Court of Auditors, the National Audit Institutions and the European Parliament (Committee on Budgetary Control) concerning the audit of the EU budget?
Vsaka od teh institucij ima v ustrezni zakonodaji jasno opredeljen mandat in pristojnosti.
Each of the above institutions has a clearly defined mandate and competences in the relevant legislation.
Kar zadeva njihovo sodelovanje, bi želel najprej navesti splošne določbe iz členov 4(3) in 13(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki določata, da je sodelovanje med EU in državami članicami ter med samimi institucijami EU „ lojalno “.
As regards their cooperation, I would like to refer, first, to the general provisions in Articles 4(3) and 13(2) of the Treaty on the European Union (TEU), according to which the cooperation between the EU and its Member States, as well as the cooperation between the EU institutions among themselves, shall be ‘ sincere ’.
Glede sodelovanja med Sodiščem in nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi pa člen 287(3) Pogodbe o delovanju EU natančneje določa, da pri opravljanju revizije v državah članicah Računsko sodišče in nacionalni revizijski organi „ sodelujejo v duhu zaupanja, pri čemer ohranjajo svojo neodvisnost “.
As regards, more specifically, cooperation between the Court and the national audit bodies, Article 287(3) TFEU states that, where audit is to be carried out in Member States, the Court and the national audit bodies shall cooperate ‘ in a spirit of trust while maintaining their independence ’.
Nacionalni revizijski organi oziroma, če ti nimajo potrebnih pooblastil, pristojne nacionalne uprave, Sodišču na njegovo zahtevo posredujejo morebitne dokumente ali informacije, ki so potrebni za opravljanje njegovih nalog.
The national audit bodies or, if these do not have the necessary powers, the competent national departments, shall forward to the Court, at its request, any document or information necessary to carry out its tasks.
Poleg tega, kar zadeva sodelovanje med Računskim sodiščem in Parlamentom, četrti pododstavek člena 287(4) Pogodbe o delovanju EU – na to se nanaša tudi vprašanje 9 – določa, da Računsko sodišče pomaga Evropskemu parlamentu (in Svetu) pri nadzoru nad izvrševanjem proračuna.
Further, as regards the cooperation between the Court and the Parliament, the fourth sub-paragraph of Article 287(4) TFEU, to which question 9 also relates, states that the Court shall assist the Parliament (and the Council) in exercising their powers of control over the implementation of the budget.
Člen 310(5) Pogodbe o delovanju EU nazadnje v zvezi s sodelovanjem nacionalnih revizijskih organov s Sodiščem in Parlamentom zahteva, da države članice sodelujejo z EU, tako da zagotovijo uporabo odobrenih proračunskih sredstev v skladu z načelom dobrega finančnega upravljanja.
Finally, as regards the cooperation of national audit bodies with both the Court and Parliament, Article 310(5) TFEU requires the Member States to cooperate with the EU to ensure that the appropriations entered in the budget are used in accordance with the principle of sound financial management.
Opisan pravni okvir EU dopolnjuje nacionalna zakonodaja, običajno v ustavah in posebnih zakonih o vrhovnih revizorskih institucijah.
The above EU legal framework is supplemented by national legislation, normally in the respective constitutions and specialised laws on Supreme Audit Institutions.
Glede na to, da doslej še nisem imel možnosti pobližje se seznaniti z obstoječim sodelovanjem Računskega sodišča z omenjenimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, menim, da je prezgodaj, da bi sam lahko podal konkretne predloge za izboljšanje.
Given that, so far, I have not had the opportunity to gain any inside knowledge of the Court’s existing cooperation with the above stakeholders, I consider it premature for me to put forward concrete proposals for improvement.
Prepričan pa sem, da lojalno sodelovanje v duhu medsebojnega zaupanja zagotavlja trden temelj za stalen napredek.
However, I am convinced that a sincere cooperation within a spirit of mutual trust provides a solid basis for continuous improvement.
Prepričan sem tudi, da lahko že moja prva predstavitev v vlogi kandidata za člana Računskega sodišča prispeva k vzpostavitvi dobrih poklicnih odnosov s Parlamentom in njegovimi poslanci, ki bodo temeljili na medsebojnem zaupanju in odprtemu dialogu.
I also trust that already my first hearing as a candidate for membership of the Court of Auditors could contribute to the establishment of a good professional relationship between myself, Parliament and its Members, based on mutual trust and an open dialogue.
Kot član Računskega sodišča bom vedno na voljo Parlamentu, zlasti Odboru za proračunski nadzor, za izmenjavo mnenj o vsakem predlogu ali pobudi, ki bi lahko prispevala k uresničevanju naših skupnih ciljev.
As a Court Member, I will always be available to Parliament, and particularly to its Committee on Budgetary Control, to exchange views on any proposal or initiative that could contribute to the achievement of our common objectives.
Končno tudi menim, da delo in izmenjave v okviru strukture odbora za stike med vrhovnimi revizorskimi organi EU ponujajo izjemno podlago za nadaljnji razvoj obstoječega sodelovanja in osredotočanje na vsebinska vprašanja v skupnem interesu.
Finally, I believe that the work and exchanges under the EU Supreme Audit Institutions Contact Committee structure offer an excellent platform for continuous development of the existing cooperation and its focus on topical issues of common interest.
Primer za to je nedavna razprava v odboru za stike o vlogi vrhovnih revizijskih institucij pri podpori vladnim ukrepom za odzivanje na gospodarsko in finančno krizo, pa tudi o vplivu Lizbonske pogodbe na upravljanje sredstev EU in njeni morebitni vplivi na delo vrhovnih nacionalnih revizorskih institucij in Računskega sodišča
Examples are the Contact Committee’s recent discussions on the role of the Supreme Audit Institutions in assisting the government measures in response to the economic and financial crisis, as well as on the impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the management of EU funds and its possible implications for the work of national Supreme Audit Institutions and the Court.
Z etičnega stališča bi bilo to primerno ravnanje.
From an ethical point of view, it would be appropriate to do so.
V skladu s členom 287(4) Pogodbe o delovanju EU Računsko sodišče pomaga Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu pri nadzoru nad izvrševanjem proračuna, zato morajo člani Sodišča uživati zaupanje Parlamenta.
According to Article 287(4) TFEU, the Court shall assist Parliament and the Council in exercising their powers of control over the implementation of the budget, and the Members of the Court therefore need to enjoy Parliament’s trust.
Seveda bi bil vsak kandidat zadovoljen, če bi Parlament o njegovi/njeni kandidaturi izrekel pozitivno mnenje.
Naturally, every candidate would be most happy to receive a favourable opinion on his/her candidacy from Parliament.
Če bi Parlament izrazil negativno mnenje o moji kandidaturi, bi ob upoštevanju razlogov, ki bi bili v izhodišču takšnega mnenja Parlamenta, temeljito premislil o svojih nadaljnjih korakih, in sicer ob usklajevanju z vlado Republike Slovaške.
Should Parliament’s opinion on my candidacy be negative, I would carefully consider what my further steps should be in light of the reasons underpinning Parliament’s opinion, in coordination with the Government of the Slovak Republic.
o predlaganju Szabolcsa Fazakasa za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Szabolcs Fazakas as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PRILOGA 1 ŽIVLJENJEPIS SZABOLCSA FAZAKASA
ANNEX 1: CURRICULUM VITAE OF Szabolcs Fazakas
PRILOGA 2 ODGOVORI SZABOLCSA FAZAKASA NA VPRAŠALNIK
ANNEX 2: ANSWERS BY Szabolcs Fazakas TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE
– ob upoštevanju člena 286(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0019/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0019/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se je Odboru za proračunski nadzor na seji dne 15. marca 2010 predstavil kandidat, ki ga Svet predlaga za člana Računskega sodišča,
– whereas, at its meeting of 15 March 2010, the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,
– ob upoštevanju člena 108 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7‑0038/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7‑0038/2010 ),
A. ker Szabolcs Fazakas izpolnjuje pogoje, ki jih določa člen 286(1) PDEU,
A. whereas Szabolcs Fazakas fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
PRILOGA 1 ŽIVLJENJEPIS SZABOLCSA FAZAKASA
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITAE OF Szabolcs Fazakas
Rojen: 26. oktobra 1947, Budimpešta, Madžarska
Born: 26 October 1947, Budapest, Hungary
· 1971 diploma iz ekonomije, Univerza za ekonomske vede, Budimpešta
· 1971 Degree of Economics; University of Economics, Budapest
· 1973 doktorat, Univerza za ekonomske vede, Budimpešta
· 1973 Doctorate,(PhD)University of Economics, Budapest
· 1973–1989 ministrstvo za zunanjo trgovino
· 1973-1989 Ministry of Foreign Trade
· 1990–1995 glavni predstavnik za Madžarsko, Avstrijska državna podjetja
· 1990-1995 Chief Representative for Hungary, Austrian State Industries
· 1995–1996 državni podsekretar, ministrstvo za industrijo in trgovino
· 1995-1996 Undersecretary of State, Ministry of Industry and Trade
· 1996 madžarski veleposlanik v Bonnu
· 1996 Ambassador of Hungary in Bonn
· 1996–98 minister za industrijo, energijo, trgovino in turizem
· 1996-98 Minister of Industry, Energy, Trade and Tourism
· 1998–2002 predstavnik skupine za Madžarsko, DaimlerCrysler Corp.
· 1998-2002 Group representative for Hungary, DaimlerChrysler Corp.
· 2002–2004 poslanec madžarskega parlamenta, predsednik IPU
· 2002-2004 Member of the Hungarian Parliament, Chairman of the IPU