natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Enako kot za proizvajalce je predlog spremembe upravičen tudi v primeru uvoznikov, saj so uvozniki subjekti, ki najbolje poznajo proizvod in njegove značilnosti.
As for manufacturers, this amendment is justified because the importer is the operator who is in a position to better know the products and their characteristics.
Kot predvideva člen 9.7 uvoznik nosi tudi odgovornost za hranjenje in razpoložljivost tehnične dokumentacije izdelka.
Moreover, and as provided for in article 9.7, importers bear the responsibility to keep the technical documentation of the products.
Uvozniki, ki menijo ali utemeljeno domnevajo, da proizvod, ki so ga dali na trg, ni v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti, izvedejo potrebne korektivne ukrepe, da zagotovijo skladnost proizvoda ali pa, če je to potrebno, umaknejo proizvod s trga in nemudoma odpokličejo od končnih uporabnikov.
Importers who consider or have reason to believe that a product which they have placed on the market is not in conformity with the applicable Community legislation shall take the necessary corrective measures to bring that product into conformity or withdraw it from the market and recall it from end users without delay , if appropriate.
Zato je predlagano, da uvozniki, ki ugotovijo, da njihovi proizvodi kršijo zakonodajo, te proizvode čim hitreje umaknejo s trga.
It is therefore recommended that importers who discover that their products are in breach with the legislation recall these items in the shortest possible period of time.
Uvozniki imajo za določeno obdobje .... [določiti čas] na vpogled izvod izjave ES o skladnosti ter jo na zahtevo predložijo organom za nadzor trga in zagotovijo, da je tehnična dokumentacija na zahtevo na voljo tem organom .
Importers shall, for a period of … [to be specified] , keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity at the disposal of the market surveillance authorities and ensure that the technical documentation can be made available to those authorities, upon request .
Uvozniki imajo za obdobje desetih let po izdelavi zadnje enote proizvoda na vpogled izvod izjave ES o skladnosti, ki jo pripravi proizvajalec , in izvod zadevne tehnične dokumentacije, ki sta na voljo nacionalnim organom za nadzor.
Importers shall, for a period of ten years after the last product unit has been manufactured, keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity prepared by the manufacturer and of the relevant technical documentation at the disposal of the national surveillance authorities.
Uvozniki v ločenem dokumentu, priloženem izjavi ES o skladnosti, izjavijo, da so se prepričali, da je bil opravljen ustrezen postopek ugotavljanja skladnosti, in da prevzemajo zakonsko odgovornost za proizvode, ki jih dajo na trg Skupnosti.
Importers shall declare in a separate document accompanying the EC declaration of conformity to have verified that the appropriate conformity assessment procedure has been carried out, and to take legal responsibility for the products they place on the Community market.
Uvozniki morajo shraniti izjavo in nacionalnim organom za nadzor omogočati vpogled vanjo še deset let po izdelavi zadnje enote proizvoda.
Importers shall keep this statement at the disposal of national surveillance authorities for a period of ten years after the last product unit has been manufactured.
Predlog sprememb k odstavku 6 vsebuje zahtevo, da morajo uvozniki v ločenem dokumentu, ki je priložen izjavi o skladnosti, navesti, da so se prepričali, da je bil izveden postopek ugotavljanja skladnosti, ter prevzeti pravno odgovornost za izdelke, ki jih dajo na trg Skupnosti.
The amendment to paragraph 6 consists in adding the requirement that importers declare in an accompanying document to the Declaration of Conformity to have verified that the conformity assessment procedure has been carried out and to take legal responsibility for the products they place on the Community market.
Le tako je namreč mogoče zagotoviti enake pogoje za proizvajalce in uvoznike.
This is the only way to ensure a level playing field between manufacturers and importers.
Člen 9, odstavek 6 a (novo)
Article 9, paragraph 6 a (new)
Uvozniki morajo še deset let po izdelavi zadnje enote proizvoda hraniti izjavo in nacionalnim organom za nadzor omogočiti vpogled vanjo.
Importers shall, for a period of ten years after the last product unit has been manufactured, keep the technical documentation at the disposal of national surveillance authorities.
Zagotovijo, da je tehnična dokumentacija vedno posodobljena.
They shall ensure that the technical documentation remains current.
Uvozniki se lahko odločijo, da bodo sami hranili izvod tehnične dokumentacije v Skupnosti, ali pa zagotovijo, da takšen izvod hrani proizvajalec.
Importers may choose either to keep themselves a copy of the technical documentation within the Community or to ensure that the manufacturer keeps such a copy.
Ta odstavek spreminja odstavek 6 izvirnega besedila Komisije, ki od uvoznikov zahteva, da oblastem na zahtevo omogočijo vpogled v tehnično dokumentacijo.
This paragraph is aimed at amending paragraph 6 of the original text of the Commission, which requires importers to ensure that technical documentation can be available to authorities upon request.
Predlog spremembe pa od uvoznikov zahteva, da shranijo tehnično dokumentacijo.
The amendment suggests requiring importers to keep the technical documentation.
Če ima proizvajalec sedež zunaj EU in v EU nima pooblaščenega predstavnika, organi nadzora težko pridejo do tehnične dokumentacije.
If the manufacturer is outside the EU and he does not have an authorised representative within the EU, it is difficult for the authorities to have access to the technical file.
Predlagamo tudi, da se obdobje spremeni na deset let.
We also suggest fixing the period to ten years.
Člen 9 odstavek 7
Article 9 paragraph 7
Uvozniki si s tujim proizvajalcem delijo odgovornost za škodo, ki jo povzročijo nevarni proizvodi ali neskladni proizvodi, ki so jih dali na trg.
Importers shall be deemed jointly liable, together with the foreign manufacturer, for the damage caused by dangerous or non-compliant products they have placed on the market.
Uvozniki bodo previdneje preverjali, ali proizvajalci spoštujejo obveznosti, ki jim jih nalaga zakonodaja, če bodo vedeli, da si bodo z njimi delili odgovornost za škodo, ki jo povzročijo nevarni proizvodi ali proizvodi, ki kršijo zakonodajo Skupnosti.
Importers will more cautiously verify the respect of obligations imposed by the law on manufacturers if they know that they will be deemed jointly responsible with them for damages caused by products dangerous or in breach with the Community law prescriptions.
Distributerji morajo delovati s potrebno skrbnostjo, da zagotovijo skladnost vseh proizvodov, ki jih dajo na trg, z ustreznimi zahtevami, kot je opredeljeno v odstavku 2 .
When making a product available on the market distributors shall act with due care in relation to the applicable requirements , as defined in paragraph 2 .
S tem pojasnilom želimo zagotoviti, da za distributerje ne veljajo vse zahteve, temveč le tiste, ki so navedene v zakonodaji EU, kot je zapisano v odstavku 2.
This clarification is intended to ascertain that distributors are not subject to any kind of requirements but those provided for by EU legislation as indicated in paragraph 2.
Člen 35, odstavek 1, odstavek 2
Article 35, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2
Če med vrednotenjem organi za nadzor trga ugotovijo, da proizvod ne izpolnjuje zahtev, ki jih določa ta .... [akt], od zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta zahtevajo, da izvede vse ustrezne korektivne ukrepe, da proizvod izpolni te zahteve, ali pa proizvod umaknejo s trga ali ga odpokličejo v roku, ki je določen glede na stopnjo tveganja.
Where, in the course of that evaluation, the market surveillance authorities find that the product does not comply with the requirements laid down by this … [act], they shall require the relevant economic operator to take all appropriate corrective actions to bring the product into compliance with those requirements or to withdraw the product from the market or recall it within such reasonable period, commensurate with the nature of the risk, as they may prescribe.
Če med vrednotenjem organi za nadzor trga ugotovijo, da proizvod ne izpolnjuje zahtev, ki jih določa ta .... [akt], od zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta nemudoma zahtevajo, da izvede vse ustrezne korektivne ukrepe, da proizvod izpolni te zahteve, ali pa proizvod umaknejo s trga ali ga odpokličejo v roku, ki je določen glede na stopnjo tveganja.
Where, in the course of that evaluation, the market surveillance authorities find that the product does not comply with the requirements laid down by this … [act], they shall require , without delay, the relevant economic operator to take all appropriate corrective actions to bring the product into compliance with those requirements or to withdraw the product from the market or recall it within such reasonable period, commensurate with the nature of the risk, as they may prescribe.
Priloga I, Modul A, odstavek 4.2., pododstavek 2
Annex I, Module A, paragraph 4.2., subparagraph 2
Vsak posamezen izdelek, dostopen na trgu , je opremljen z izvodom izjave o skladnosti.
A copy of the declaration of conformity shall be supplied with each product that is made available on the market.
Izvod izjave o skladnosti se na zahtevo posreduje pristojnemu organu .
A copy of the declaration of conformity shall be supplied to the relevant authorities upon request .
Obveznost o zagotavljanju izvoda izjave o skladnosti z vsako prodano enoto je stroškovno izjemno zahtevna za gospodarske subjekte.
The obligation of providing a copy of the Declaration of Conformity with each unit sold is burdensome beyond proportions for economic operators.
Njena veljavnost je omejena zgolj na prodajo v velikih količinah.
Its qualification of interpretation applies only to bulk sales.
Takšna zahteva ni uresničljiva v primeru množičnih izdelkov, ki se prodajajo posamično, zato je treba črtati nekatere določbe v točki 4.2.
Such requirement is unfeasible for mass products sold individually and such provision in article 4.2 must be deleted.
Priloga I, Modul A, odstavek 5 a (novo)
Annex I, Module A, paragraph 5 a (new)
Uvozniki morajo za obdobje desetih let po izdelavi zadnje enote proizvoda hraniti izvod izjave ES o skladnosti, ki jo pripravi proizvajalec, ter omogočati vpogled vanjo nacionalnim organom za nadzor.
Importers shall, for a period of ten years after the last product unit has been manufactured, keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity prepared by the manufacturer at the disposal of national surveillance authorities.
Uvozniki morajo še deset let po izdelavi zadnje enote proizvoda hraniti izjavo in nacionalnim organom za nadzor omogočati vpogled vanjo.
Importers shall, for a period of ten years after the last product unit has been manufactured, keep the technical documentation at the disposal of national surveillance authorities.
(Ta predlog sprememb velja tudi za naslednje module: modul A1, modul A2, modul C, modul C1, modul C2, modul D, modul D1, modul E, modul E1 modul F, modul F1, modul G, modul H, modul H1.
(This amendment applies also to the following modules: Module A1, Module A2, Module C, Module C1, Module C2, Module D, Module D1, Module E, Module E1 Module F, Module F1, Module G, Module H, Module H1.
Uvozniki morajo storiti naslednje: hraniti izvod izjave o skladnosti; v ločenem dokumentu, ki je priložen izjavi o skladnosti, navesti, da so se prepričali, da je bil izveden postopek ugotavljanja skladnosti, ter prevzeti pravno odgovornost za izdelke, ki jih dajo na trg; in hraniti tehnično dokumentacijo.
Importers are required: to keep a copy of the Declaration of Conformity; to declare in an accompanying document to the DoC to have verified that the conformity assessment procedure has been carried out and to take legal responsibility for the products they place on the market; and to keep the technical documentation.
Priloga I, Modul A1, odstavek 5.2.
Annex I, Module A1, paragraph 5.2.
Proizvajalec za vzorčni izdelek sestavi pisno izjavo o skladnosti in jo hrani skupaj s tehnično dokumentacijo, ki je nacionalnim organom na voljo 10 let 1 po tem, ko je bil proizveden zadnji izdelek.
The manufacturer shall draw up a written declaration of conformity for a product model and keep it with the technical documentation at the disposal of the national authorities for a period of 10 years 1 after the last product has been manufactured.
Izjava o skladnosti opredeljuje izdelek, za katerega je bila sestavljena.
The declaration of conformity shall identify the product for which it has been drawn up.
(Predlog sprememb velja tudi za modul A1, točka 5.2; modul A2 - točka 5.2; modul C - točka 3.2; modul C1 - točka 4,2; modul C2 - točka 4,2; modul D - točka 5.2; modul D1 - točka 7.2; modul E - točka 5.2; modul E1 - točka 7.2; modul F - točka 6.2; modul F1 - točka 7,2; modul G - točka 5.2; modul H - točka 5,2; modul H1 - točka 6.2.
(This amendment applies also to Module A1 - point 5.2; Module A2 – point 5.2; Module C – point 3.2; Module C1 – point 4.2; Module C2 – point 4.2; Module D – point 5.2; Module D1 – point 7.2; Module E – point 5.2; Module E1 – point 7.2; Module F – point 6.2; Module F1 – point 7.2; Module G – point 5.2; Module H – point 5.2; Module H1 - point 6.2.
To obdobje se lahko s posebnimi zakonodajnimi instrumenti spremeni.
1 The specific legislative instruments may alter this period.
Skupne okvir za trženje proizvodov
Common framework for the marketing of products
MNENJE OdborA za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnem okviru za trženje proizvodov
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision on a common framework for the marketing of products
Glede na prihodnjo zakonodajo o notranjem trgu se želi s predlogom zavezati institucije Skupnosti na področju „novega in starega pristopa“.
The proposal aims to commit the Community institutions themselves, with a view to future legislation in the area of the ‘old and new approach’.
Vendar to ni pravno zavezujoče.
Yet in legal terms such a binding effect is not possible.
Institucije EU lahko brez nadaljnjega pri vsaki reviziji veljavnih ali pri uvedbi novih pravil o notranjem trgu sprejmejo predpise, ki odstopajo od tega sklepa.
The EU institutions may always issue provisions that deviate from this decision when revising existing internal market rules, or introducing new ones.
Če sklep ni pravno zavezujoč za zakonodajalca Skupnosti, potem je bolje, da se zaradi pravne varnosti tudi ne daje takšnega vtisa.
For reasons of legal certainty, if the decision cannot have any binding effect on the Community legislator, it should avoid giving the impression that it does so.
Sicer lahko pri izvajanju sklepa nastanejo občutne težave.
Otherwise, considerable implementation problems could occur.
Glede na to predlog sklepa v ničemer ne spreminja obstoječega pravnega stanja.
In light of this, it is considered that the proposal for a decision does not offer any added value to the current legal situation.
Z vsebinskega vidika gre v predlogu dejansko samo za priporočila zakonodajalcu, kako naj v prihodnosti uredi zahteve v zvezi z notranjim trgom.
In terms of content, it cannot in fact go any further than making recommendations to the legislator to regulate internal market requirements in a certain way in the future.
Takšna priporočila je do sedaj vseboval „Vodnik za izvajanje direktiv v skladu z novim in skupnim pristopom“ (Evropska komisija, Bruselj, 2000).
Such recommendations have, until now, been recorded in the ‘Guide to the implementation of directives based on the new approach and the global approach’ (European Commission, Brussels 2000).
Vključiti zakonodajalce v časovno zamuden postopek soodločanja o predlogu sklepa se ne zdi sorazmerno.
It seems disproportionate to involve the legislators in a time-consuming codecision procedure for this draft decision.
Če je namen paketa o notranjem trgu, predloženega 14.2.2007, doseči čim večjo možno horizontalno usklajenost vseh sektorjev, povezanih z notranjim trgom, potem se mora takoj in neposredno ustrezno uskladiti vse relevantne sektorje.
If the intention of the internal market package submitted on 14 February 2007 is to obtain horizontal harmonisation of all internal market relevant sectors that is as wide-ranging as possible, then a corresponding harmonisation of all relevant sectors should be immediately and directly implemented.
V povezavi s tem je Komisija v svojem internem osnutku „Horizontalni zakonodajni pristop h usklajevanju zakonodaje o industrijskih izdelkih“ (N 560 - 1 EN) z dne 6. septembra 2006 naprej predvidela samo en zakonodajni predlog, ki naj bi neposredno vplival na veljavno zakonodajo.
Accordingly, in its internal draft of 6 September 2006 ‘A horizontal legislative approach to the harmonisation of legislation on industrial products’ (N 560 - 1 EN), the Commission had planned only a legislative proposal directly affecting current law.
Predlog sklepa nasprotuje prizadevanjem vseh organov Skupnosti, da bi izboljšali in poenostavili zakonodajo.
This proposal for a decision contradicts the efforts of all Community bodies to improve and simplify legislation.
Predlagana pobuda vzbuja vtis, da naj bi zakonodajalci obravnavali predlog sklepa, ki je v takšni obliki nepotreben in nejasen.
The initiative presented gives the impression that the legislators should deal with a proposal for a decision that is, in this form, unnecessary and also unclear.
Tako na primer ni jasno področje uporabe, opredelitev izjem pa se zdi samovoljna (člen 1).
For example, the scope is unclear and the definitions of exceptions seem to have been prepared at random (Article 1).
Iz navedenih razlogov se predlog sklepa zavrne.
For these reasons the draft decision should be rejected.
Elementi predloga sklepa se vključijo v uredbo o določitvi zahtev za akreditacijo in nadzor trga v zvezi s trženjem proizvodov ( KOM(2007)0037 ).
Elements of the proposal for a decision should be incorporated into the ‘Proposal for a regulation on setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products’ ( COM(2007)0037 ).
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov kot pristojni odbor, da predlaga zavrnitev predloga Komisije.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
Skupni okvir za trženje proizvodov
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision on a common framework for the marketing of products
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnem okviru za trženje proizvodov
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common framework for the marketing of products
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja predlog uredbe o akreditaciji in tržnem nadzoru proizvodov in spremni predlog sklepa o skupnem okviru za trženje proizvodov.
The draftsman welcomes the proposal for a regulation on the accreditation and market surveillance of products, and the accompanying proposal for a decision on a common framework for the marketing of products.
Namen teh predlogov je olajšati delovanje notranjega trga z blagom in hkrati zagotoviti varnost proizvodov, ki vstopajo na notranji trg in na njem krožijo.
These are designed to facilitate the operation of the internal market of goods whilst ensuring that the products entered and circulated in the internal market are safe.
Sklep bo deloval kot skupna zbirka instrumentov za prihodnjo področno zakonodajo.
The Decision will work as a common toolbox for future sectoral legislation.
Vzpostavlja skupen pravni okvir za oblikovanje usklajenih in enostavnih opredelitev ter postopkov za trženje industrijskih proizvodov, prav tako pojasnjuje vlogo in pomen znaka CE.
It sets out a common legal framework to create coherent and simple definitions and procedures for the marketing of industrial products, and clarifies the role and meaning of the CE marking.
Kot je bilo že uvodoma povedano, pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja oba predloga, vendar hkrati meni, da ju je mogoče dodatno izboljšati, zato predlaga predloge sprememb v skladu z naslednjimi točkami:
Though the draftsman, as stated above, welcomes the proposals, he is of the opinion that there is a room for further improvement and therefore proposes amendments along the following lines:
§ Treba je uvesti naslednje nove opredelitve: skupno začetno tipsko preizkušanje (shared ITT), kaskadno začetno tipsko preizkušanje (cascading ITT) ter skupni rezultati začetnega tipskega preizkušanja (shared ITT results); treba je zagotoviti skladnost opredelitev v uredbi in direktivi.
§ New definitions on "ITT", "shared ITT results", "cascading ITT" have to be introduced; coherence of definitions in the Regulation and the Decision must be ensured.
Zato se sedaj člen 6 sklepa (o opredelitvah) nanaša na člen 2 uredbe in vključuje le te dodatne opredelitve.
Therefore, Article 6 of the Decision (on definitions) now refers to Article 2 of the Regulation, with only these additional definitions;
§ Kar zadeva postopke: da bi se izognili nepotrebnim birokratskim postopkom bi morali pri izvajanju postopkov za ocenjevanje skladnosti upoštevati tudi druge dejavnike, kot so velikost podjetja, sorazmerna zapletenost uporabljene tehnologije ter ali je proizvod rezultat posamične ali serijske proizvodnje.
§ As far as procedures are concerned: in order to avoid unnecessary red tape burdens, other factors such as the size of the company, the relative complexity of the technology used, and whether or not a product is a result of unit or series production should be taken into account when carrying out conformity procedures.
Členi 3, 9, 22 in 31 sklepa so spremenjeni v skladu s tem.
Articles 3, 9, 22 and 31 of the Decision are amended in this way.
Gospodarski subjekti bi morali imeti pravico, da odgovorijo na odločitve organov v zvezi s svojimi proizvodi, in sicer preden ti organi o tem obvestijo druge države članice, vendar bi morali biti obvezani, da zagotovijo sprejetje vseh možnih ukrepov za umik neskladnih proizvodov.
Economic operators should have the right to respond to decisions by authorities on their products before these inform other Member States, but they should be obliged to ensure that all possible measures are taken to withdraw non-compliant products.
Ta vprašanja so obravnavana v okviru predlogov sprememb k členu 35.
These points are covered by amendments to Article 35;
§ Zakonodaja v zvezi z možnimi pomanjkljivosti usklajenih standardov (člen 14) je bila spremenjena zaradi vključitve sklicevanja na evropske organizacije za standardizacijo, s katerimi se je treba najprej posvetovati.
§ Legislation relating to possible loopholes in harmonised standards (Article 14) has been amended to incorporate references to the European Standard Organisation (ESO), which should be consulted in the first instance.
To bi skrajšalo nepotreben birokratski postopek, takšno posvetovanje pa se že izvaja v okviru direktive o nizki napetosti; da se zagotovi vključevanje zainteresiranih strani in poklicnih organizacij so spremenjeni naslednji členi:
This would reduce unnecessary bureaucracy, and is current practice in the context of the Low Voltage Directive;
§ člen 16, odstavek 1, in člen 34 uredbe ter člen 14 sklepa.
§ Article 16, paragraph 1 and Article 34 of the Regulation, as well as Article 14 of the Decision are amended to ensure more involvement of stakeholders and professional organizations.
Predlog spremembe k členu 25 omogoča akreditacijo organov, ki za industrijo opravljajo storitve ugotavljanja skladnosti.
An amendment to Article 25 makes it possible for industry-run conformity assessment bodies to be accredited;