natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glede na veliko težo zasledovanih ciljev je ob upoštevanju načela sorazmernosti in zahteve po varstvu osebnih podatkov upravičeno, da se zagotovi splošna objava zadevnih informacij o upravičencih.
Given the overriding weight of the objectives pursued it is justified with regard to the principle of proportionality and the requirement of the protection of personal data to provide for the general publication of the relevant information on beneficiaries.
(4a) Vstavi se naslednji člen 10a:
(4a) The following Article 10a is inserted:
„Člen 10a
"Article 10a
Objava seznama upravičencev
Publication of the beneficiaries
V skladu s členom 53b(2)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 1605/2002 in členom 44a Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 države članice zagotovijo naknadno letno objavo seznama upravičencev do katerekoli pomoči iz členov 3, 4a, 6, 7, 8 in 9 te uredbe, za katero so zaprosili v tržnih letih 2006/2007, 2007/2008, 2008/2009 ali 2009/2010 ter vsot, ki so jih upravičenci prejeli.
Pursuant to Article 53 b (2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 and Article 44a of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, Member States shall ensure annual ex-post publication of the beneficiaries of any of the aid referred to in Articles 3, 4a, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this Regulation claimed for any of the marketing years 2006/2007, 2007/2008, 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 and the amounts received per beneficiary.
Objava vsebuje vsaj celotni znesek javnega financiranja na upravičenca, njegovo/njeno ime in priimek ali, v primeru pravnih oseb ali podjetja, ime družbe ter kraj prebivališča in/ali registracije sedeža.
The publication shall contain at least the total amount of public funding per beneficiary, his/her name and surname, or in the case of a legal person or enterprise, the firm, as well as the place of residence and/or registered seat."
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 318/2006 o skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0177/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0177/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0310/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0310/2007 ),
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2 Člen 10, odstavek 2, pododstavek 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 318/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2 Article 10, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 318/2006)
Z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka se za države članice, za katere je bila nacionalna kvota za sladkor zmanjšana zaradi opustitev kvote v skladu s členom 3 in členom 4(a)4 Uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006, določi veljavni odstotek v skladu z merili iz Priloge VIII k tej uredbi.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, for Member States for which the national quota has been reduced as a result of renunciations of quota in accordance with Articles 3 and 4(a)4 of Regulation (EC) No 320/2006, the applicable percentage shall be fixed in accordance with the criteria laid down in Annex VIII to this Regulation.
Takšne države članice za vsako podjetje na svojem ozemlju, ki razpolaga s kvoto, prilagodijo odstotek, ki izhaja iz uporabe Priloge VIII, sorazmerno s posamezno opustitvijo kvot v shemi za prestrukturiranje za zadevno podjetje tako, da se skupno zmanjšanje kvot v državi članici na podlagi odstotka iz drugega pododstavka ne spremeni.
Such Member States shall adjust, for each undertaking in their territory holding a quota, the percentage derived from the application of Annex VIII in proportion to the individual renunciation of quotas within the restructuring scheme for the undertaking concerned, in such a way that the total reduction of quotas in the Member State resulting from the percentage referred to in the second subparagraph remains unchanged.
Z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka se za države članice, za katere je bila nacionalna kvota za sladkor zmanjšana za manj kot 13,5 % v okviru opustitev kvote, uporablja zmanjšanje preostale kvote za dosego 86,5 % kvote, dodeljene na začetku tržnega leta 2006/2007.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, for Member States for which the national quota has been reduced as a result of renunciations of quota by less than 13.5%, the remaining quota shall be cut to 86.5% of the quota allocated to them at the beginning of the 2006/2007 marketing year.
Ob uvedbi končnega zmanjšanja kvot bi bilo primerno predvideti postopek v dveh korakih.
A two-stage procedure is advisable for the final cut.
Države članice ali podjetja, ki ne bodo prešla na prostovoljno opustitev za leto 2008/09 ali ki bodo opustila manj kot 13,5 % svoje kvote, bodo na začetku morala prenesti zmanjšanje za 13,5 %.
At the first stage, Member States and/or undertakings which have voluntarily renounced none or less than 13.5% of their quotas for 2008/2009 should have those quotas cut by 13.5%.
Kasneje bi se lahko uporabila formula, ki jo predlaga Komisija: opustitve kvot za leti 2006/07 in 2007/08 bi bilo tako treba izključiti iz končnega zmanjšanja, saj že izkoriščajo retroaktivno povečanje zneska iz strukturnih pomoči.
The second stage can then be carried out in accordance with the formula proposed by the Commission, although returned quotas for 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 should be excluded, since they have already benefited from the backdated increase in the structural premium.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 3 B, PODODSTAVEK - 1 (novo) Člen 11, odstavek 1, alinea 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 318/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 (B), SUBPARAGRAPH -1 (new) Article 11, paragraph 1, indent 2 (Regulation (EC) No 318/2006)
v odstavku 1 se druga alinea nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
In paragraph 1, the second indent is replaced by the following:
„– do 10 % za tržno leto 2008/2009 ter naslednja leta, ob upoštevanju svobode podjetij, da sodelujejo pri mehanizmih, ki jih uvaja Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006“;
'- by up to 10% for the marketing year 2008/2009 and following, while duly respecting the freedom of undertakings to take part in the mechanisms laid down by Regulation (EC) No 320/2006.'
V času prvih dveh tržnih let (2006/2007 in 2007/2008) je bilo ugotovljeno, da so nekatere države članice poskušale uporabiti določbe iz člena 11 za oviranje podjetij, ki so bila pripravljena sodelovati v shemi za prestrukturiranje.
During the first two marketing years (2006/2007 and 2007/2008) it was found that some Member States sought to use the provisions of Article 11 in order to obstruct those undertakings which declared themselves prepared to take part in the restructuring regime.
Zato so nujne spremembe, ki bodo zagotovile, da se takšni pojavi ne bodo nadaljevali.
It is indispensable that amendments be made so as to ensure that phenomena of this kind will not continue.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 5 Člen 19, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1a (Uredba (ES) št. 318/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5 Article 19, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (Regulation (EC) No 318/2006)
V tem primeru se tradicionalne potrebe po dobavi uvoženega surovega sladkorja za prečiščevanje iz člena 29(1) te uredbe zmanjšajo za isti odstotek za zadevno tržno leto.
In this case, the traditional supply needs of imported unrefined sugar for refineries referred to in Article 29, paragraph 1, of this regulation shall be reduced by the same percentage in the marketing year in question.
Ta določba je bila namenjena politični uravnoteženosti uredbe, ki jo je Svet sprejel februarja 2006.
This provision formed part of the political balance of the regulation adopted by the Council in February 2006.
Z umikom v okviru tradicionalnih potreb po dobavi se ne zmanjša preferencialni dostop za države AKP, ker imajo te države možnost prodaje količine surovega sladkorja, ki presega tradicionalne potrebe po dobavi, bodisi tradicionalnim rafinerijam bodisi proizvajalcem pesnega sladkorja.
The withdrawal applicable to Traditional Supply Needs (TSN) does not reduce the preferential access for ACP countries, since they are then able to sell the volume of raw sugar in excess of the TSN either to traditional refiners or to sugar beet producers.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 6 Člen 19 a, odstavek 1, pododstavek 1 (Uredba (ES) št. 318/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 Article 19 a, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No° 318/2006)
Z odstopanjem od člena 19(2) in v skladu s postopkom iz člena 39(2) se lahko Komisija odloči, da določi koeficient iz člena 19(2) za tržna leta 2007/2008, 2008/2009 in 2009/2010 do najpozneje 16. marca prejšnjega tržnega leta, ob upoštevanju rezultata zmanjšanja nacionalne kvote za sladkor v vsaki državi članici, kot je bila določena v Prilogi III k tej uredbi v primerjavi z različico Priloge III, ki se je uporabljala 1. julija 2006.
By way of derogation from Article 19(2), and in accordance with the procedure referred to Article 39(2), the Commission may decide to fix the coefficient referred to in Article 19(2) for the 2007/2008, 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 marketing years by 16 March at the latest of the previous marketing year, taking into account the result of the reduction in each Member State of the national sugar quota as fixed in Annex III to this Regulation compared to the version of Annex III applicable on 1 July 2006.
Za države članice, ki 1. julija 2006 niso bile članice Skupnosti, je treba pri primerjavi upoštevati različico Priloge III, ki se je uporabljala na datum njihovega pristopa k Skupnosti.
For those Member States which were not members of the Community on 1 July 2006, the comparison should take account of the version of Annex III applicable on the date of their accession to the Community.
Z odstopanjem od člena 19(2) in v skladu s postopkom iz člena 39(2) se lahko Komisija odloči, da določi koeficient iz člena 19(2) :
By way of derogation from Article 19(2), and in accordance with the procedure referred to Article 39(2), the Commission may decide to fix the coefficient referred to in Article 19(2):
– za tržno leto 2007/2008 do najpozneje 16. marca prejšnjega tržnega leta,
- for the 2007/2008 marketing year by 16 March at the latest of the previous marketing year,
– za tržno leto 2008/2009 do najpozneje 4. februarja 2008 in
- for the 2008/2009 marketing year by 4 February 2008 at the latest, and
– za tržno leto 2009/2010 ter do tržnega leta 2014/2015 do najpozneje 16. marca prejšnjega tržnega leta , ob upoštevanju rezultata zmanjšanja nacionalne kvote za sladkor v vsaki državi članici, kot je bila določena v Prilogi III k tej uredbi v primerjavi z različico Priloge III, ki se je uporabljala 1. julija 2006.
- for the 2009/2010 marketing year until the 2014/2015 marketing year by 16 March at the latest of the previous marketing year taking into account the result of the reduction in each Member State of the national sugar quota as fixed in Annex III to this Regulation compared to the version of Annex III applicable on 1 July 2006.
Upoštevajoč popolno izvajanje in začetek veljavnosti pobude „vse razen orožja“ od leta 2010 dalje ter upoštevajoč zamenjavo referenčne cene z intervencijsko ceno je mehanizem umika edini razpoložljiv mehanizem za upravljanje ponudbe na trgu Skupnosti.
Given the full implementation and entry into force of the 'Everything But Arms' initiative from 2010, and the replacement of the reference price by the intervention price, the withdrawal mechanism constitutes the only available instrument for managing supply to the Community market.
Torej, da bi se Skupnost lahko soočila z nestabilnostjo trga in nihanjem cen, je izvajanje preventivnega umika nujno podaljšati na obdobje po letu 2010.
If therefore the Community is to be able to face market instability and price fluctuations, it is necessary to extend application of the preventive withdrawal scheme beyond 2010.
Razglasitev, s katero bi lahko uvedli morebitni preventivni umik, mora omogočati, da se v drugi fazi oddaje prošenj sprostijo dodatne kvote.
The announcement of a possible preventive withdrawal has to allow additional renunciations in the second phase of applications.
Če naj bo druga faza učinkovita in izvedljiva, morajo pridelovalci sladkorne pese ter industrija sladkorja odločitev sprejeti hitro, zlasti zato da bi lahko ukrepali pred setvijo.
However in order for this second phase of applications to be efficient and manageable, the sugar beet growers as well as the industry have to take this decision rapidly, in particular to be able to react before the sowing period.
Takoj po preteku roka za predložitev prošenj (31. januarja 2008), bo Komisija lahko določila koeficient in s tem začela drugo fazo oddaje prošenj (predlog spremembe št. 9 k členu 1(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006).
As soon as the applications’ deadline (31 January 2008) is reached, the Commission will be able to fix this coefficient in order to open the second phase of applications (Amendment 9 of Council Regulation n° 320/2006, Article 1, paragraph 1).
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 6 Člen 19 a, odstavek 1, pododstavek 2a (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 318/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 Article 19 a, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 318/2006)
Za uporabo tega člena se dovoljeni odstotek umika za tržno leto 2009/2010 zmanjša za odstotek, določen za države članice, ki so se v tržnem letu 2008/2009 odločile, da bodo dokončno opustile svoje kvote za sladkor do odstotka, ki je enak začasnim zmanjšanjem, določenim v Prilogi III.
For the application of this Article, the possible withdrawal percentage for the 2009/2010 marketing year shall be reduced by the corresponding percentage for those Member States which decided in the 2008/2009 marketing year to definitively suspend their sugar quotas by the same percentage as the temporary reductions as laid down in Annex III.
PRILOGA Priloga VIII, odstavek 2a (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 318/2006)
ANNEX Annex VIII, paragraph 2 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 318/2006)
Če neka država članica v tržnem letu 2008/2009 opusti odstotek kvote, ki presega odstotek umika, določen 16. marca 2007 v členu 1(1) ali členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 290/2007, se količina kvote, enaka razliki med odstotkom, opuščenim v tržnem letu 2008/2009, in odstotkom umika, v celoti odšteje od končnega zmanjšanja.
During the2008/2009 marketing year, if a Member State renounces a percentage of the quota in excess of the withdrawal percentage set on 16 March 2007 in Article 1(1) or Article 1(2) of Regulation EC No 290/2007, the quota tonnage corresponding to the difference between the percentage renounced in 2008/2009 and the percentage of withdrawal shall be deducted in full from the final cut.
Ta določba se enako uporablja znotraj držav članic za podjetja, ki so opustila odstotek kvote, ki presega odstotek umika za državo članico, v kateri so ustanovljena, določen 16. marca 2007 v členu 1(1) ali členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 290/2007.
Within a Member State, this provision shall apply in the same way to the benefit of undertakings which have renounced a percentage of their quota in excess of the withdrawal percentage set on 16 March 2007 in Article 1(1) or Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 290/2007 for their Member State.
Priporočljivo bi bilo prestrukturiranje spodbujati tako, da se olajša odštevanje opustitev od končnega zmanjšanja, da bi tako podjetja, ki opustijo odstotek kvot, ki presega odstotek, veljaven za državo članico, v kateri so ustanovljena, imela od tega korist pri končnem zmanjšanju, če se za to prostovoljno odločijo.
Restructuring should be stimulated by making it easier to deduct withdrawals from the final cut, so that undertakings which renounce a percentage of their quota in excess of the percentage applied to their Member State when the cut is made benefit from their voluntary decision.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 318/2006 o skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja
on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector
2006, str.1. , ki sta bili del obsežne sladkorne reforme iz leta 2005
OJ L 58 of 28.2.2006, p.1 which were part of the big sugar reform of 2005
Že po 18 mesecih se je izkazalo, da ukrepi ne zadostujejo za dosego ciljev reforme do leta 2010 in jih je po mnenju Komisije treba spremeniti.
18 months later the measures have already been shown to be insufficient to achieve the reform goals until 2010 and have to be adapted, according to the Commission.
EU je pod stalnim pritiskom držav, ki proizvajajo sladkor, kot na primer Brazilija, Avstralija in Tajska, ter Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, ki Evropsko unijo obtožujejo, da s svojo ureditvijo v sektorju sladkorja krši svoje dolžnosti v okviru sporazuma o kmetijstvu
The EU is under ongoing pressure from sugar producing countries like Brazil, Australia and Thailand and the World Trade Organization who accuse the European Union of violating, by its sugar regime, its obligations under the WTO Agreement on Agriculture
Svetovna trgovinska organizacija, 28. aprila 2005 WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, WT/DS283/AB/R – EVROPSKE SKUPNOSTI – IZVOZNA NADOMESTILA ZA SLADKOR – Poročilo pritožbenega organa: http://docsonline.wto.org/gen_search.asp?searchmode=simple Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
World Trade Organisation, 28 April 2005, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, WT/DS283/AB/R -EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – EXPORT SUBSIDIES ON SUGAR - Report of the Appellate Body: http://docsonline.wto.org/gen_search.asp?searchmode=simple .
Namen drugega predloga (ki spreminja Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 318/2006 o skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja) je ukinitev določbe, v skladu s katero bodo tradicionalne potrebe po dobavi za rafinerije v primeru umika zmanjšane.
The purpose of the second proposal (amending Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector) is to abolish the provision according to which traditional supply needs for refiners will be reduced in case of a withdrawal.
S predlogom se skuša tudi:
Also, the proposal seeks:
– spremeniti in uvesti sistem pragov namesto sistema, ki znižuje raven učinkovite proizvodnje sladkorja v okviru kvote;
- to introduce a system of thresholds – moving away from a system which reduces the level of sugar effectively produced under quota;
– odobriti prvi sklep pred setvijo, če je mogoče, in ga dopolniti z dodatnim umikom v oktobru na podlagi posodobljenih podatkov;
- to conclude a first decision before sowing takes place, possibly completed by a further withdrawal in October, based on updated data;
Proračunski postopek 2008 – nekaj številk
2008 budget procedure -some figures
Koliko bo ureditev ES za sladkor stala v celoti?
What will the EC sugar regime cost in total?
Odhodki Skupnosti za ureditev za sladkor vplivajo na dve glavni poglavji naslova 05 proračuna, 05 02 Intervencije na kmetijskih trgih in 05 03 Neposredne pomoči;
The expenditure of the Community on the sugar regime has effect on the two main chapters of Title 05 of the Budget, 05 02, Intervention in agricultural markets, and 05 03, direct aids:
Poglavje člen
Chapter Article
PPP 2008
PDB 2008
Razlika 2008-2007
Difference 2008-2007
Upravni odhodki na področju Kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
Administrative expenditure of Agriculture and Rural Development policy area
Intervencije na kmetijskih trgih
Interventions in agricultural markets
Sladkor 05 02 05
of which Sugar 05 02 05
Pri 05 02 (Neposredne pomoči) je odhodek enostavno prepoznaven, saj poglavje 05 02 05 obravnava sladkor.
Concerning 05 02 (Direct aids) the expenditure development is easily recognisable, as Chapter 05 02 05 deals with sugar.
V PPP za leto 2008 se pričakuje povečanje sredstev za sektor sladkorja (118 milijonov EUR), kar je, kot v PPP navaja Komisija, v prehodni fazi organizacije trga po reformi leta 2005 normalno, zlasti ker bodo še naprej obstajala izvozna nadomestila in lahko pričakujemo, da ne bo več intervencijskih zalog, ki bi jih lahko prodajali na domačem trgu z neto dobičkom za proračun.
An increase in appropriations is expected in PDB 2008 in the sugar sector (EUR 118 million), a normal development, as the Commission states in the PDB, "during what is effectively a transition phase of the market organisation following the reform of 2005, in particular because export refunds will continue to apply and because it is expected that there will no longer be any intervention stocks to be sold onto the domestic market at a net gain to the budget."
Presenetljiv učinek reforme, za katero bi mislili, da bo imela ravno nasproten cilj.
A surprising effect of a reform, which, one would think, would have the opposite objective.
Podrobni odhodki iz člena 05 02 05 so sledeči (tabela 1):
In detail, the expenditure on Article 05 02 05 is as follows (table 1):
Proračun 2007 (v milijonih)
Budget 2007 (in millions)
PPP 2008 (v milijonih)
PDB 2008 (in millions)
PP 2008 (v milijonih)
DB 2008 (in millions)
Razlika 2008–2007 (v milijonih)
Difference 2008 - 2007 (in millions)
05 02 05 Sladkor
05 02 05 Sugar
Razlika OO
Difference CA
Razlika OP
Difference PA
Ukrepi za skladiščenje sladkorja
Storage measures for sugar
Skupaj 05 02 05
Subtotal 05 02 05
Kljub začasnemu povečanju za 118 milijonov EUR v letu 2008 v primerjavi z letom 2007, bi morala sladkorna reforma povzročiti prenos plačil s tržne intervencije („podpore“ – 05 02) na neposredno pomoč (05 03).
Although there is a temporary increase of EUR 118 million in 2008 compared to 2007, the sugar reform should normally have the effect that payments are shifted away from interventions into markets ("subsidising" -05 02) to Direct aids (05 03).
Z drugimi besedami, kar bo pridobljeno z zmanjšanjem domače proizvodnje, bo porabljeno za neposredno pomoč (popolnoma nevezano na proizvodnjo) za proizvajalce in kmete; iz tega razloga bo prestrukturiranje družbeno in okoljsko sprejemljivo.
In other words, what will be gained by reducing the domestic production will be spent on direct aids (fully decoupled from production) for producers and farmers, making the restructuring socially and environmentally acceptable.
Poleg tega obstajajo še drugi odhodki, povezani s sladkorjem (tabela 2):
In addition to this there is other expenditure related to sugar (table 2):
PPP 2008 (v milijonih)
PDB 2008 (in millions
Ločeno plačilo za sladkor
Separate sugar payment
Podpora za prilagajanje za države pogodbenice Protokola o sladkorju
Adjustment support for sugar protocol countries
SKUPAJ SLADKOR
TOTAL SUGAR
Opaziti je še dodaten porast obveznosti v višini 147.5 milijonov EUR in plačil v višini 193 milijonov EUR.
We note another increase of EUR 147.5 million in commitments and EUR 193 million in payments.
Kar zadeva neposredno pomoč, kot navaja Komisija v PPP
Concerning direct aids, as the Commission puts it in its PDB
Drug razlog za povečanje pa je postopna uvedba nadomestil za proizvajalce sladkorne pese v EU-15 (+184 milijonov EUR).
Other reasons for the increase are the continued phasing-in of the compensation to sugar beet producers in EU-15 (+EUR 184 million)..."
To je verjetno razlog, zakaj Komisija v finančnem poročilu navaja, da ukrep ni imel finančnega učinka.
That is probably why the Commission states in the Financial Statement that the measure had "no financial impact".
V skladu s finančnim poročilom, ki je dodan predlogu, se dodatni zneski pomoči za prestrukturiranje lahko financirajo iz sklada za prestrukturiranje, za katerega še vedno velja načelo samofinanciranja.
According to the Financial Statement attached to the proposal, the additional amounts for the restructuring aids can be financed within the Restructuring Fund whose principle of self-financing remains valid.
Sklad bi bil v celoti porabljen, če bi se v letu 3 odpovedali 3,85 milijonom ton kvot (ostanek: le približno 54 milijonov EUR), glede na simulacijo finančnega stanja sklada v skladu temi novimi pravili.
The Fund would be fully spent with around 3.85 million tonnes of quotas renounced in year 3 (residual balance: around only EUR 54 million), according to the simulation of the financial situation of the Fund under these new rules.
Tudi sklad za prestrukturiranje bo treba pozorno spremljati.
The Restructuring Fund will also need to be monitored closely.