natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4. na podlagi priporočil ocenjevalne študije je bila v novo besedilo protokola vstavljena klavzula o pregledu (člen 11), ki omogoča spremembe protokola, če bi prišlo do večjih sprememb političnih usmeritev, ki so privedle do sklenitve veljavnega protokola.
4. on the basis of the recommendations made in the evaluation, a review clause (Article 11) has been incorporated in the new Protocol so as to enable it to be amended should any significant changes occur in the policy guidelines that led to its conclusion.
Vključena je tudi zaščitna klavzula, ki Evropski uniji omogoča, da v določenih okoliščinah začasno razveljavi uporabo protokola ali pregleda finančni prispevek, če Salomonovi otoki sektorske politike na izvajajo pravilno (člen 7(6) in (7)).
The Protocol also includes a safeguard clause whereby the EU may, under certain circumstances, cease to apply it or, alternatively, adjust the financial contribution due under it should Solomon Islands be found wanting as regards the implementation of its sectoral fisheries policy (Article 7(6) and (7)).
Poročevalka torej meni, da je vloženi predlog sporazuma o partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Salomonovimi otoki v bistvenih točkah v interesu obeh strani, in priporoča njegovo odobritev.
In the light of the foregoing, the rapporteur considers that the proposal for a partnership agreement between the EU and Solomon Islands essentially serves the interests of both parties, and she therefore recommends that it be approved.
Vendar Evropsko komisijo poziva:
However, she also making the following requests to the Commission:
– naj Parlamentu posreduje sklepe zasedanj in dela skupnega odbora iz člena 9 sporazuma ter večletni sektorski program iz člena 7(2) protokola in rezultate zadevnih letnih ocen;
– the Commission should send Parliament the conclusions of the meetings and proceedings of the Joint Committee provided for in Article 9 of the Agreement, as well as the multiannual sectoral programme referred to in Article 7(2) of the Protocol and the findings of the annual assessments;
– naj na zasedanjih in pri delu skupnega odbora kot opazovalci sodelujejo predstavniki Odbora za ribištvo Evropskega parlamenta;
– representatives of the Committee on Fisheries, acting as observers, should attend Joint Committee meetings and proceedings;
– naj Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu pred ponovnimi pogajanji o sporazumu predloži poročilo o njegovem izvajanju;
– the Commission should submit an implementation review of the Agreement to Parliament and the Council before the Agreement is renegotiated;
– da morata biti Evropski parlament in Svet deležna nepristranske obravnave v zvezi s pravico do popolne in takojšnje obveščenosti ter v zvezi s spremljanjem in ocenjevanjem izvajanja vsakega mednarodnega sporazuma na področju ribištva, pa tudi v zvezi s pogajanji o njihovem pregledu.
– Parliament and the Council should be treated fairly both as regards the right to be immediately and fully informed and in connection with monitoring and assessment of the implementation of international fisheries agreements and with negotiations on their revision.
Dodaja, da pravna podlaga za dolžnost obveščanja izhaja iz dejstva, da je za Parlament nedopustno, da bi se omejil zgolj na pasivno sprejemanje dejanj drugih evropskih institucij v vednost, namesto da bi mu bilo omogočeno vplivati na odločitve Komisije in Sveta ter tako prispevati h končnemu sprejetju besedil na plenarnem zasedanju.
The legal basis of this duty to inform stems, moreover, from the fact that Parliament cannot be reduced to the role of merely taking note, in a passive way, of the actions of the other European institutions, instead of being allowed to influence Commission and Council decisions and hence help secure final approval in plenary of the acts concerned.
Obveznost obveščanja odraža tudi splošnejšo dolžnost institucij, da med seboj „lojalno sodelujejo“, kakor je določeno v členu 13(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
The requirement to inform Parliament also mirrors the more general obligation incumbent on the institutions to practise ‘mutual sincere cooperation’ in accordance with Article 13(2) of the TEU.
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Salomonovimi otoki
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusions of a Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands
Sporazum o ribolovu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Salomonovimi otoki je potekel oktobra lani.
The Fisheries Agreement between the European Community and the Solomon Islands expired last October.
Novi protokol velja od 9. oktobra 2009 do 8. oktobra 2012 in se začasno že izvaja v času postopka za odobritev Evropskega parlamenta.
The new Protocol is valid from 9 October 2009 to 8 October 2012 and is already provisionally applied pending the European Parliament consent's procedure.
Evropski parlament lahko v skladu s členom 43(2) in členom 218(6)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije poda odobritev ali pa je ne poda.
According to the Article 43, paragraph 2 and Article 218, paragraph 6(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union the European Parliament can either consent or decline to consent.
Možnost, da odobritve ne bo podal, mora biti zadnje sredstvo, ki se ga uporabi, ko obstajajo dokazi, da se področje uporabe sporazuma ne spoštuje ustrezno.
The possibility to refuse the consent must be seen as a last resort tool linked to the evidence that the scope of the agreement is not duly respected.
V skladu z osnutkom sporazuma se strani obvezujejo, da bodo spodbujale odgovoren ribolov v ribolovni coni Salomonovih otokov na podlagi načela nediskriminacije med različnimi flotami, ki lovijo v ribolovni coni Salomonovih otokov, ob tem pa bodo spodbujale politični dialog o potrebnih reformah.
According to the draft agreement the Parties undertake to promote responsible fishing in Solomon Islands fishing zone on the principle of non-discrimination between the different fleets fishing in the Solomon Islands fishing zone at same time promoting a policy dialogue on the necessary reforms.
Sporazum pa ne omejuje količine ulovljenega tuna.
However the agreement does not limit the quantity of tuna fish catches.
Finančni prispevek iz sporazuma zajema letni znesek 260.000 EUR, kar ustreza referenčni tonaži v višini 4000 ton letno, zato EU plačuje 65 EUR na tono, kar je pičla vsota, če upoštevamo, da maloprodajna cena znaša 30 EUR za kilogram, kar je 50.000-odstotni pribitek in bi ga lahko obravnavali kot izkoriščanje in ne razvoj!
The financial contribution referred to in the Agreement comprises an annual amount of EUR 260 000 equivalent to a reference tonnage of 4 000 tonnes per year, therefore the EU pays EUR 65 per tonne, a figure which sounds paltry when the street price of tuna is EUR 30 per kg, a mark-up of 50,000 %, which could be regarded as exploitation, not development!
Poleg tega EU plačuje poseben znesek v višini 140.000 EUR letno za podporo in izvajanje sektorske ribiške politike Salomonovih otokov.
In addition the EU pays a specific amount of EUR 140 000 per year for the support and implementation of Solomon Islands' sectoral fisheries policy.
Če količine, ki jih ulovijo plovila Skupnosti, presegajo količine, ki ustrezajo dvakratnemu skupnemu letnemu znesku, se znesek za količino, ki presega to zgornjo mejo, plača naslednje leto.
Where the quantities caught by Community vessels exceed the quantities corresponding to twice the total annual amount, the amount due for the quantity exceeding that limit shall be paid the following year.
Za države v razvoju bi to lahko bilo problematično zaradi več razlogov.
For developing countries, this might be problematic for various reasons.
Problematično vprašanje je tudi, da se ta sredstva izplačujejo organom Salomonovih otokov, ki imajo izključno pristojnost za odločanje o njihovi uporabi.
Another problematic issue is that the allocation of these funds is paid to the Solomon Islands authorities, which have full discretion regarding the use to which it is put.
Kdo torej dejansko koristi ta sredstva?
Who are then the real beneficiaries of these funds?
Pripravljavec mnenja na koncu izraža mnenje, da sporazumi o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju ne bi smeli biti le zakonit način za omogočanje evropskim plovilom, da dostopajo do ribolovnih virov tretjih držav, ampak tudi orodje za spodbujanje odgovornega in trajnostnega izkoriščanja morskih virov ter za to, da se zagotovi, da so finančni prispevki evropskih davkoplačevalcev namenjeni in dodeljeni le razvojnim ciljem, kar pomeni, da se jih porabi v korist ribiških skupnosti, za izboljšanje življenjskih razmer, zagotavljanje usposabljanja, varnost na morju in ustvarjanje novih lokalnih delovnih mest.
In conclusion, your rapporteur is of the opinion that the Fishery partnership agreements should not be only a legal way to allow European vessels to have access to the fishery resources of third countries, but also a tool to promote responsible sustainable exploitation of the sea resources and that the financial contributions paid by the European taxpayers are ring-fenced and earmarked for development goals, i.e. to be spent in favour of the fishermen communities, to improve living conditions, to ensure training, safety at sea and to create new local jobs.
Odbor DEVE zato meni, da je treba pri izvajanju sporazuma upoštevati naslednje:
The DEVE Committee therefore believes the following issues should be taken into account during the implementation of the agreement:
Evropsko unijo je treba opozoriti na redna poročila o izvajanju sporazuma.
Regular reports on the implementation of the agreement should be brought to the attention of the European Union.
Odbor za razvoj poziva Odbor za ribištvo kot pristojni odbor, naj Parlamentu predlaga, naj se z odobritvijo strinja le, če Evropska komisija in Salomonovi otoki sprejmejo naslednje pogoje in če ti pogoji predstavljajo dodatek ali prilogo k sporazumu:
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament agree to give its consent only if the following conditions are accepted by the European Commission and by Solomon Islands and constitute an addendum or annex to the Agreement:
(a) izboljšana preglednost postopkov za opredelitev skupnega ulova,
(a) the transparency of the procedures to identify the total catches is improved;
(b) ni dvomov glede poštenosti mehanizmov v celoti v zvezi s problemom korupcije,
(b) the probity of the mechanisms in their entirety vis-à-vis the corruption problem is free from all doubt;
(c) okrepljena odgovornost lokalne vlade, ki mora zagotoviti izboljšanje življenjskih pogojev lokalnih ribičev,
(c) the accountability of the local Government, which should guarantee the improving of living conditions of local fishermen, is reinforced;
(d) spoštovanje minimalnih standardov in pogojev, dogovorjenih na regionalni ravni,
(d) minimum standards and conditions agreed at regional level are respected;
(e) Evropska unija je seznanjena z rednimi poročili o izvajanju sporazuma,
(e) regular reports on the implementation of the Agreement are brought to the attention of the European Union;
(f) zagotavljanje prostega dostopa do poročil in dokazov o nedvomnem obstoju presežka ribolovnih virov, v tem primeru staležev tunov, Parlamentu ter javnosti v Evropski uniji in na Salomonovih otokih;
(f) reports and evidence clearly documenting the existence of a surplus of fisheries resources, in this case tuna stocks, are made freely available to Parliament and to the public both in the European Union and in Solomon Islands;
(g) zagotavljanje razvoja lokalnega in trajnostnega malega ribolova ter lokalne in trajnostne ribje predelovalne industrije.
(g) the development of local, sustainable, artisanal fisheries and local, sustainable fish-processing industries are ensured.
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Enrique Guerrero Salom, András Gyürk, Franziska Keller, Norbert Neuser, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Patrice Tirolien, Ivo Vajgl, Anna Záborská, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Enrique Guerrero Salom, András Gyürk, Franziska Keller, Norbert Neuser, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Eleni Theocharous, Patrice Tirolien, Ivo Vajgl, Anna Záborská, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Salomonovimi otoki
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusions of a Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands
Pripravljavec mnenja: François Alfonsi
Rapporteur: François Alfonsi
Predlog za sklep Sveta je bil posredovan Parlamentu šele 22. aprila 2010.
The present proposal for a Council Decision was only transmitted to Parliament on 22 April 2010.
Pred Lizbonsko pogodbo se je Svet o takšnih sklepih zgolj posvetoval s Parlamentom, takšnim mnenjem pa so imela na institucionalni ravni premalo vpliva, čeprav mora v skladu z veljavnim okvirnim sporazumom o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo slednja posredovati informacije v vseh fazah procesa, ki vodi do sklenitve sporazuma; te informacije morajo biti na voljo pravočasno, da lahko Parlament poda svoje mnenje, Komisija pa to mnenje čim bolj upošteva.
Before the Treaty of Lisbon Parliament was only consulted on such conclusions by the Council and such opinions lacked institutional teeth, despite the fact that, according to the current Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission, the Commission is to provide information at all stages of the process leading up to the conclusion of the agreements and such information has to be provided in sufficient time for Parliament to be able to express its point of view and for the Commission to take Parliament’s views as far as possible into account.
Parlament lahko zdaj izbira na podlagi člena 43(2) in člena 218(6)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije med odobritvijo in zavrnitvijo.
Now Parliament has a choice of either consenting or declining to consent under Article 43(2) and Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
V členu 81(3) Poslovnika je predvideno, da lahko Parlament pripravi vmesno poročilo, da bi pripomogel k ugodnemu izidu.
Rule 81(3) provides that Parliament can present an interim report in the interests of achieving a positive outcome.
Da bi bila ta vmesna poročila učinkovita, jih je običajno treba pripraviti precej preden se Parlament zaprosi za odobritev.
Such interim reports should normally however be presented well before Parliament is asked to give its consent, in order to be effective.
Parlament se še vedno pogaja o okvirnem sporazumu s Komisijo, izid teh pogajanj pa bo pomemben za zadevne odbore, da bodo vedeli, kako obravnavati te sporazume v prihodnje, zlasti kar zadeva časovni razpored posredovanja mnenj in pripravljanja osnutkov poročil.
Parliament is still in the process of negotiating a new framework agreement with the Commission, the outcome of which will be important for the committees concerned to see how to deal with such agreements in future, especially as regards the timing of giving opinions and drafting of reports.
Sporazumi se lahko začasno izvajajo pred njihovo sklenitvijo in preden jih Parlament odobri, kar pa je dodatno vprašanje, ki ga je treba obravnavati, saj bi lahko spodkopalo verodostojnost EU, če začasno izvajani sporazum ne bo sklenjen.
The fact that agreements can be provisionally applied before their conclusion and before Parliament’s consent is another problem to be looked at, as it would undermine the EU’s credibility if an agreement were to be provisionally applied but could not be concluded.
Vsebinsko so značilnosti sporazuma naslednje ( KOM(2010)0177 , Ocena finančnih posledic zakonodajnega predloga):
In terms of content, the Agreement’s characteristics are as follows ( COM(2010)0177 Legislative financial statement):
Predvideni stroški financiranja ukrepa skupaj v milijonih EUR
Total indicative cost of action EUR million
Vrsta odhodkov
Type of expenditure
OPO, vključno s stroški za človeške vire, skupaj
Total CA including cost of human resources
OP, vključno s stroški za človeške vire, skupaj
Total PA including cost of human resources
V primerjavi s predhodnim sporazumom in protokolom je v skladu z novim protokolom dostop do voda Salomonovih otokov dovoljen manjšemu številu plovil.
Under the new Agreement fewer vessels will be able to access Solomon Islands waters than under the previous Agreement and Protocol.
Kar zadeva skupno oceno staležev, se bo pod določenimi pogoji lahko odobrila možnost prilagajanja ribolovnih kvot.
Following a joint evaluation of stocks, permission to readjust fishing quotas may be granted under certain conditions.
Finančni prispevek EU bo sestavljen iz:
The European Union’s financial contribution can be broken down as follows:
- letnega prispevka v višini 260.000 EUR za ribolovne pravice v višini 4000 ton na leto (65 EUR za tono),
- an annual sum of EUR 260 000 for fishing rights of 4 000 tonnes per year (EUR 65 per tonne),
- zneska v višini 140.000 EUR za podporo in izvajanje sektorske ribiške politike Salomonovih otokov.
- a sum of EUR 140 000 for support and implementation of the sectoral fisheries policy in Solomon Islands,
Skupaj 400.000 EUR letno.
i.e. EUR 400 000 per year;
- 251.300 EUR za tri leta za stroške upravljanja in kadrovanja, ki niso vključeni v referenčni znesek.
- an amount of EUR 251 300 in total over three years for administration costs and human resources not included in the reference amount,
Skupni znesek 1.451.300 EUR za tri leta veljavnosti sporazuma.
making in total an amount of EUR 1 451 300 for the three years of the agreement.
Za plovila Skupnosti ni določena zgornja meja pri dodatnem ulovu tunov.
There is no upper limit for catches of tuna by Community vessels over and above the total annual amount.
Vsaka dodatna tona bo stala 65 EUR.
Each additional tonne will cost EUR 65.
Če količina ulova plovil Skupnosti presega količino, ki ustreza dvakratnemu skupnemu letnemu znesku, se znesek za presežek plača šele naslednje leto.
If Community vessels catch more than double the total annual amount, the sums due for catches in excess of this figure will not be paid until the following year.
Po razvrstitvi glede na stopnjo korupcije v državah, ki jo pripravi Transparency International, sodijo Salomonovi otoki na 111. mesto med 180 državami.
Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index ranks Solomon Islands at 111 out of 180 countries.
Komisija mora preveriti, v kakšnem obsegu so bile in bodo porabljene vsote denarja, o katerih je bil sklenjen sporazum s Salomonovi otoki.
The Commission needs to verify to what extent monies have been and will be spent as agreed with Solomon Islands.
Pravilno poročanje o ulovu je bistven del sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju.
Correct reporting of catches is an essential element of the fisheries partnership agreement.
Odbor za proračun ponavlja svoje zahteve, ki jih je že posredoval Komisiji:
The Committee on Budgets reiterates its earlier calls for the Commission to:
· naj vsako leto oceni, ali so države članice, katerih plovila delujejo v skladu s protokolom k sporazumu, izpolnile obveznosti poročanja o ulovu.
· check every year whether Member States whose vessels operate under the Protocol to the Agreement have complied with reporting requirements.
Če jih niso, bi morala Komisija zavrniti njihove zahteve za ribolovna dovoljenja za naslednje leto;
Where this is not the case, the Commission should refuse to grant their requests for fishing licences for the following year;
· naj letno poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o rezultatih večletnega sektorskega programa, opisanega v členu 7 protokola, ter o tem, ali države članice izpolnjujejo obveznosti poročanja o ulovu;
· report annually to Parliament and the Council on the results of the multiannual sectoral programme described in Article 7 of the Protocol, as well as on compliance by the Member States with reporting requirements;
· naj pred iztekom veljavnosti protokola ali začetkom pogajanj za njegovo morebitno obnovitev Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži naknadno oceno protokola skupaj z analizo razmerja med stroški in koristmi.
· submit, before the Protocol expires or before negotiations for its possible replacement begin, to Parliament and the Council an ex post evaluation of the Protocol, including a cost-benefit analysis.
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za ribištvo kot pristojni odbor, naj Parlamentu predlaga, naj odobri sklenitev sporazuma.
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement.
François Alfonsi, Maria Da Graça Carvalho, Peter Jahr, Riikka Manner, Peter Šťastný, Georgios Stavrakakis (Georgios Stavrakakis), Theodor Dumitru Stolojan
François Alfonsi, Maria Da Graça Carvalho, Peter Jahr, Riikka Manner, Peter Šťastný, Georgios Stavrakakis, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan
o posebnem poročilu Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu po osnutku priporočila Evropski komisiji v pritožbi št. 676/2008/RT
on the Special Report by the European Ombudsman following his draft recommendation to the European Commission in complaint 676/2008RT
Poročevalka: Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli)
Rapporteur: Chrysoula Paliadeli
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu, ki je bilo predloženo 24. februarja 2010,
– having regard to the Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament submitted on 24 February 2010,
– ob upoštevanju drugega pododstavka člena 228(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (nekdanji člen 195 PES),
– having regard to Article 228(1), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex Article 195 TEC),
– ob upoštevanju členov 41(1), 42 in 43 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 41(1), 42, and 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. marca 1994 o pravilih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic
– having regard to Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties
15. , kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom 2008/587/ES Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. junija 2008
15. , as last amended by Decision 2008/587/EC of the European Parliament of 18 June 2008
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic o odnosih s pritožnikom v zvezi s kršitvami zakonodaje Skupnosti ( KOM(2002)0141 )
– having regard to the Commission communication to the European Parliament and the European Ombudsman on relations with the complainant in respect of infringements of Community law ( COM(2002)0141 )
– ob upoštevanju prvega stavka člena 205(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 205(2), first sentence, of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A7-0293/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0293/2010 ),
A. ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic v skladu s členom 228 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pooblaščen za sprejemanje pritožb državljanov Unije glede primerov nepravilnosti pri dejavnostih institucij ali organov Unije,
A. whereas Article 228 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union empowers the European Ombudsman to receive complaints from any citizen of the Union concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of the Union institutions or bodies,
B. ker so pritožbe državljanov EU pomemben vir informacij o morebitnih kršitvah zakonodaje EU,
B. whereas complaints submitted by EU citizens constitute an important source of information on possible infringements of EU law,