natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Razvoj vodilnega nosilca znanja: Evropskega tehnološkega inštituta" ( KOM(2006)0077 ) so bili opredeljeni le širši elementi predlaganega ETI, od katerih so bili nekateri podrobneje opisani v kasnejšem sporočilu z naslovom "Evropski tehnološki inštitut: nadaljnji koraki v zvezi z njegovo ustanovitvijo" ( KOM(2006)0276 ).
Developing a knowledge flagship: The European Institute of Technology" ( COM(2006)0077 ) defined only the broad elements of the proposed EIT, some of which were further elaborated in the later Communication "The European Institute of Technology: further steps towards its creation" ( COM(2006)0276 ).
Zakonodajni predlog ( KOM(2006)0604 končno/2) je bil objavljen 13. novembra 2006.
The legislative proposal (COM(2006) 604 final/2) was published on 13 November 2006.
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji o letni strategiji politik za leto 2007 ( A6-0154/2006 ) izrazil dvom v ETI, ko je opozoril na nevarnost, da se bo ETI zgolj prekrival z obstoječimi strukturami oziroma da jih bo oslabil, in izrazil bojazen, da bo ETI ogrozil že tako omejena sredstva, dodeljena raziskavam in inovacijam.
The European Parliament in its Annual Policy Strategy 2007 Resolution ( A6-0154/2006 ) expressed scepticism towards the EIT, stressing the danger that the EIT will merely overlap or undermine existing structures and fearing that the EIT will prejudice the already limited resources allocated to research and innovation.
Evropski svet je ETI izrazil podporo na zasedanju od 14. do 15. decembra 2006: "Svet in Evropski parlament bi morala po temeljiti preučitvi predloga Komisije leta 2007 hitro sprejeti Sklep o ustanovitvi Evropskega tehnološkega inštituta".
The European Council expressed support for the EIT in its meeting of 14-15 December 2006: "The Council and the European Parliament should, after having carried out a thorough examination of the Commission's proposal, move swiftly to adopt, in 2007, a decision to set up the European Institute of Technology."
Poročevalec trdno verjame v idejo o boljši usklajenosti prizadevanj na področju raziskav, inovacij in izobraževanja v Skupnosti, v pomen oblikovanja javno-zasebnih partnerstev na področju raziskav in razvoja, vključno z bazičnimi raziskavami, ter v omogočanje lažje dostopnosti novega znanja malim in srednjim podjetjem.
Your rapporteur believes firmly in the idea of better coordination of research, innovation and education efforts in the Community, in the importance of creating public-private partnerships in R&D including in basic research, and in facilitating the access of SMEs to new knowledge.
Vseeno pa je zaskrbljen nad nekoliko naglo predstavitvijo ideje s tako daljnosežnimi posledicami, še toliko bolj v primeru, ko se več drugih novih instrumentov politik, ki obravnavajo iste probleme, nahaja v najzgodnejši fazi izvajanja.
However, he is also concerned with the somewhat hasty way in which an idea of such long-term consequence is being presented - doubly so when it comes at a time when several other new policy instruments addressing the same problems are in the earliest phases of their implementation.
Trenutno se s pobudami za podporo raziskavam in inovacijam ukvarja vsaj pet različnih generalnih direktoratov Komisije (RTD, ENTR, REGIO, EAC, INFSO).
At least five different Commission directorate-generals (RTD, ENTR, REGIO, EAC, INFSO) are currently managing initiatives to support research and innovation.
ETI bi se v pravi obliki med dejavnostmi Skupnosti na področju raziskav in inovacij lahko izkazal za uporabnega, a je njegov razlog za obstoj v celoti odvisen od številnih še ne dovolj pojasnjenih vidikov, od katerih so najpomembnejši obravnavani v nadaljevanju.
Given the right form, the EIT may prove useful in the Community's research and innovation activities, but its whole raison-d'être depends on a number of points not yet sufficiently clarified, the most important of which are addressed below.
Struktura in odgovornost
Structure and accountability
Komisija za osnovno strukturo ETI predlaga dve entiteti:
The Commission has proposed two entities to form the basic structure of the EIT:
· upravni odbor ter
· The Governing Board
· skupnosti znanja in inovacij.
· The Knowledge and Innovation Communities
Komisija predvideva majhen upravni odbor, ki ga imenuje Komisija na podlagi predlogov odbora za določitev.
The Commission envisages a small Governing Board appointed by the Commission on the basis of proposals from an Identification Committee.
Z imenovanjem bo zagotovljeno ravnotežje med zastopanostjo akademskih/raziskovalnih in poslovnih izkušenj.
Appointment will balance representation of academic/research and business experience.
Imenovani člani bodo imeli časovno omejen mandat in se bodo stalno menjavali.
The appointed members will have a time-limited mandate and will be replaced on a rolling basis.
Upravni odbor bo sprejemal horizontalne in strateške odločitve o dejavnostih ETI: ugotavljanje strateških področij in glavnih tematskih raziskovalnih področij raziskav, ustanavljanje "skupnosti znanja in inovacij" (SZI); izbiranje, spremljanje in ocenjevanje konzorcijev za upravljanje teh SZI; usklajevanje različnih dejavnosti SZI.
The Governing Board will take the horizontal and strategic decisions on the EIT's activities: identifying the strategic fields and main thematic research areas, establishing "Knowledge and Innovation Communities" (KICs); selecting, monitoring and evaluating the consortia to operate these KICs; and coordinate the different KIC activities.
SZI so zamišljene kot partnerstva, v katerih bi ekipe z univerz, raziskovalnih organizacij in industrije sodelovale pri obravnavi strateško pomembne teme na interdisciplinarnem področju, in bodo opravljale vse operativne dejavnosti ETI.
The KICs are thought to be partnerships where teams from universities, research organisations and industry would work together to address a strategically important topic in an inter-disciplinary field, and they will perform all operational activities of the EIT.
Izbira predlogov za SZI bi temeljila na javnih in preglednih natečajih.
The selection of proposals for KICs would be based on open and transparent competitions.
Poročevalec pozdravlja celoten pogled Komisije na strukturo ETI, čeprav ugotavlja, da je iz razlogov, ki so opisani v nadaljevanju, pomanjkljiva.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission's overall view on the structure of the EIT, although he also finds it incomplete for the following reasons.
Eden od poglavitnih problemov je izbirni postopek upravnega odbora in odgovornosti ETI.
One main problem lies in the selection process of the Governing Board and the accountability of the EIT.
V prvi vrsti bi moral biti izbirni postopek za upravni odbor bolj pregleden, zlasti v odnosu do Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Firstly, the selection procedure for the Governing Board should be more transparent, notably towards the European Parliament and the Council.
S tem ni mišljeno, da bi morala Evropski parlament in Svet izbrati člane odbora za določitev ali celo člane samega upravnega odbora, temveč da je treba zgolj zagotoviti, da bo postopek pregleden in vključeval ustrezno poročanje Komisije drugim institucijam.
This is not to say that the European Parliament and the Council should select the members of the identification committee or indeed the members of the Governing Board itself, but merely it must be secured that the procedure is a transparent one and one where the Commission reports appropriately to the other institutions.
Poleg tega je v predlogu Komisije pri določanju strateških prednostnih nalog ETI predvideno zgolj posvetovanje s Komisijo.
Furthermore, the Commission's proposal only foresees consultation of the Commission in determining the strategic priorities of the EIT.
Tu bi nedvomno bilo treba Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu omogočiti odobritev teh prednostnih nalog pred njihovim dokončnim sprejetjem.
Here clearly the European Parliament and the Council should be enabled to endorse these priorities prior to their final adoption.
Raven financiranja raziskav in razvoja v EU zaostaja za našimi glavnimi tekmeci.
The level of R&D funding in the EU lags behind our main competitors.
Intenzivnost raziskav in razvoja (tj. izdatkov, izraženih v odstotkih BDP) v EU25 je bila leta 2003 1,92 %, medtem ko je bila v Združenih državah Amerike 2,59 %, na Japonskem pa 3,15 %.
Research & Development intensity (i.e. expenditure as a percentage of GDP) in the EU25 stood at 1.92% in 2003 while it was 2.59% in the United States and 3.15% in Japan.
Le dvema državama članicama, in sicer Švedski in Finski, je uspelo doseči cilj iz Barcelone 3 % porabe BDP za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije.
Only two Member States, Sweden and Finland, have met the Barcelona target of spending 3% of GDP on R&D and innovation.
Treba bi bilo tudi opozoriti, da se je finančni prispevek k sedmemu okvirnemu raziskovalnemu programu zmanjšal za 30 % vizavi predlogu Komisije, ki je sledil sporazumu o finančni perspektivi za obdobje 2007-2013.
It should also be recalled that the financial attribution to the 7th Research Framework Programme (FP7) was reduced by 30% vis-à-vis the Commission's proposal following the agreement on the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013.
Podobno se je za 24 % zmanjšal tudi proračun programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije (CIP).
The budget for the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) was similarly reduced by 24%.
Ob upoštevanju pomanjkanja finančnih sredstev za raziskave in razvoj v EU bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da ETI ne bi črpal sredstev iz že obstoječih dejavnosti Skupnosti na tem področju.
Taking into account the lack of R&D funding in the EU, it should be ensured that the EIT does not drain resources from existing Community activities in the field.
Osrednja finančna sredstva Skupnosti za EIT bi bilo treba k obstoječi finančni perspektivi dodati kot dodatek, dodatna finančna sredstva pa bi bilo treba pridobiti iz različnih virov, vključno z viri Skupnosti ter nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in zasebnimi viri.
The Community core funding for the EIT should be added as a topping-up to the existing Financial Perspectives and additional funding should be obtained from different sources, including community, national, regional and private sources.
Da bi postal vodilna ustanova na področju inovacij v Evropi, mora biti ETI sposoben zagotoviti precejšnjo količino zasebnih finančnih sredstev.
In order to become a "flagship" of European innovation, the EIT must be able secure a significant amount of private funding.
Smisel ETI bo ravno v sposobnosti za povečanje lastnih finančnih sredstev, bodisi iz zunanjih virov bodisi iz prihodkov od lastnih dejavnosti (vključno z upravljanjem pravic intelektualne lastnine, ki si jih bo ETI, kot je predvideno v predlogu, sčasoma pridobil).
The ability to raise its own funding, be it from external sources or from revenues of its own activities (including management of intellectual property rights (IPR) which the proposal foresees the EIT will accumulate over time) will be the very raison d'être of the EIT.
Poročevalec pozdravlja predlog Komisije, da bi moral velik delež dohodka ETI prihajati od njegovega zaslužka prek pogodb za raziskave in izobraževanje.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission's suggestion that a large share of the EIT's income should come from its earnings through contracts for research and education.
Gre za področje, na katerem Evropa očitno zaostaja za ZDA, kjer univerze in raziskovalne ustanove svoje znanje precej bolje spreminjajo v kapital.
This is an area where Europe is clearly lagging behind the US where universities and research institutions are much better in capitalising their knowledge.
Vendar je to lahko povezano tudi z drugimi dejavniki, kot so splošno pomanjkanje izkušenj in pobud evropskih univerz na področju pravic intelektualne lastnine, omejitve za univerzitetno osebje kar zadeva zunanje dejavnosti in pomanjkanje vzpostavljenih vezi med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem, za katere ETI ne bo prinesel takojšnjih rešitev.
This, however, may also have to do with other factors such as European Universities' general lack of experience and initiative in the IPR field, limitations on university staff as regards external activities, and the lack of established bonds between the public and the private sector - neither of which the EIT will bring an immediate solution to.
Tudi v tem primeru je treba razmisliti, ali skupne tehnološke pobude v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa morda ne ponujajo boljše rešitve, in skrbeti za izogibanje prekrivanju med sedmim okvirnim programom in dejavnostmi ETI.
Here too, it must be considered whether the JTIs under FP7 do not provide a better solution, and care must be taken to avoid overlaps between FP7 and EIT activities.
Trikotnik znanja
The Knowledge Triangle
Komisija predlaga, da bi dejavnosti ETI vključevale vse tri dele trikotnika znanja: inovacije, raziskave in izobraževanje.
The Commission has suggested that the activities of the EIT would include all three parts of the knowledge triangle: innovation, research and education.
Poročevalec priznava pomen vseh treh elementov, hkrati pa je trdno prepričan, da bo glavna naloga ETI spodbujanje inovacij.
While acknowledging the importance of all three elements, your rapporteur strongly believes that the main task of the EIT will be to promote innovation.
Posledično bodo raziskovalne naloge ETI bolj posvečene ustvarjanju inovacij kot pa bazičnim raziskavam.
Consequently, the research tasks of the EIT would concentrate on innovation creation rather than on basic research.
Priporočljivo bi bilo, da bi ETI odražal raziskovalne teme sedmega okvirnega programa, evropskih tehnoloških platform in skupnih tehnoloških pobud, ter tesno sodeloval z Evropskim raziskovalnim svetom (ERC).
It would be advisable for the EIT to reflect the research themes of the FP7, European Technology Platforms and JTIs, and overall to have a close co-operation with the European Research Council (ERC).
Poročevalec ni prepričan, da bi močan izobraževalni element v ETI evropskemu raziskovalnemu prostoru prinesel dodano vrednost, zlasti ker so za visokošolsko izobraževanje odgovorne države članice.
Your rapporteur remains unconvinced that a strong education element in the EIT would bring added value to the European Research Area, especially since the responsibility for higher education rests with the Member States.
Pravzaprav se zdi, da sama pravna podlaga predloga izključuje možnost, da bi ETI igral vlogo izobraževalne ustanove in dejansko podeljeval stopnje izobrazbe.
In fact, it would seem that the legal basis of the proposal itself excludes the possibility for the EIT to play the role of an educational institution and actually award degrees.
Namesto tega bi moral ETI raje razviti zaščitni znak oz. blagovno znamko – "diplomo ETI" –, ki bo dopolnjevala in dodala vrednost formalnim akademskim stopnjam izobrazbe, podeljenih s strani izobraževalnih ustanov, ki sodelujejo v SZI.
Rather the EIT should develop a brand or label - an 'EIT diploma' - which will supplement and add value to the formalised academic degrees awarded by the educational institutions participating in the KICs .
Nevarnost prekrivanja in razlog za ETI
Risks of overlap and justification for an EIT
Namen ETI je treba videti kot dopolnitev drugih pobud Skupnosti na področju raziskav in inovacij, predvsem sedmega okvirnega programa ter programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije.
The function of the EIT must be seen as complementary to the other Community initiatives on research and innovation, mainly FP7 and CIP.
Logično je, da je del programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije, ki zadeva inovacije, osredotočen na preoblikovanje rezultatov raziskav v tržne inovacije, kar prinaša koristi evropskim podjetjem, industriji in konkurenčnosti s posebnim poudarkom na malih in srednjih podjetjih.
The innovation part of the CIP programme logically focuses on transforming research results into commercial innovations, which benefit European business, industry and competitiveness with a special focus on SMEs.
V tem okviru je težko videti možnost za dopolnilno vlogo ETI.
In this context it is difficult to see a possible complementary role for the EIT.
Poročevalec bi podprl skoraj vsako prizadevanje Skupnosti, ki bi inovacijam, raziskavam in izobraževanju namenilo dodatna sredstva, vendar bi bil presenečen, če bi bila ta finančna sredstva dodeljena dejavnostim, ki se prekrivajo s tistimi, ki jih je Evropski svet zmanjšal s sporazumom o finančni perspektivi.
Your rapporteur would support almost any Community effort which assigns additional resources to innovation, research and education, but would be surprised to see such funds committed to activities overlapping those reduced by the European Council in the agreement on the Financial Perspectives.
Kar zadeva pristop od spodaj navzgor v okviru ETI, pri katerem lahko zasebne družbe na ETI naslovijo predloge projektov, o katerih nato od zgoraj navzdol odloča upravni odbor, je treba reči, da v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa že obstaja podobna struktura v obliki integriranih projektov in skupnih tehnoloških pobud, številne države članice pa lahko tudi dokažejo prisotnost takšnega sodelovanja na regionalni ravni.
As regards the bottom-up approach under the EIT whereby private companies can address the EIT with project proposals which will then be decided upon top-down by the EIT Governing Board, a similar structure already exists under FP7 in the form of Integrated Projects and JTIs, and many Member States can also testify to the existence of such cooperation at regional level.
Čeprav so na evropski ravni zares potrebna tovrstna dodatna partnerstva, ni ustrezne utemeljitve, da bi bil predlagani ETI najboljši način za obravnavo tega problema.
While there is a real need for additional partnerships of this type at European level, it has not been adequately justified that the proposed EIT would be the best way to address this.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti tudi na to, da imajo številne države članice dobro delujoče nacionalne inovacijske agencije z ustaljeno prakso povezovanja industrije in raziskovalnih ustanov.
It should also be recalled that many Member States have well functioning innovation agencies at national level, which have well established practises in bringing together industry and research institutions.
Pomembna vloga ETI bi bilo preučevanje najboljših praks iz različnih držav, ki bi mu v kasnejši fazi morda sledilo zagotavljanje stalne platforme za izmenjavo izkušenj za nacionalne programe, raziskovalne fundacije in agencije držav članic.
An important role of an EIT would be to examine best practises from different countries and possibly at a later stage provide a permanent platform for exchange of experience for Member States' national programmes, research foundations and agencies.
Nov organ na ravni Skupnosti bi k obstoječim pobudam lahko prispeval dodano vrednost, vendar lahko do tega pride le, ko bo ocena pilotskega projekta pokazala, da koncept ETI Evropi in evropskemu raziskovalnemu prostoru prinaša dodano vrednost v smislu inovacij in konkurenčnosti.
A new body on Community level may add value to existing initiatives, but this can only be established once an evaluation of a pilot project has shown that the EIT concept provides added value for Europe - both in terms of innovation and competitiveness and for the European Research Area.
Šele po temeljitem pregledu "pilotskega" ETI na podlagi neodvisnega zunanjega vrednotenja lahko pride do odločitve o ustanovitvi ETI kot stalnega organa Skupnosti oziroma ugotovitve, da bi bilo za Evropo bolje nameniti finančna sredstva drugim dejavnostim Skupnosti na področju inovacij ter raziskav in razvoja.
Only after a thorough review of a "pilot" EIT, based on an independent external evaluation, can it be decided whether the EIT should be established as a permanent community body or if Europe would be better served by directing the funds to other Community innovation and R&D activities.
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje (*)
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education (*)
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega tehnološkega inštituta
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Institute of Technology
Po preučitvi končnega predloga uredbe Komisije o ustanovitvi Evropskega tehnološkega inštituta
Having considered the final proposal for a regulation submitted by the Commission on the establishment of the European Institute of Technology
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega tehnološkega inštituta ( KOM(2006)0604 ), z dne 18. oktobra 2006. , bi pripravljavka mnenja rada opozorila na naslednje točke:
Proposal of 18 October 2006 for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the European Institute of Technology, COM(2006)0604 . , your draftswoman wishes to draw attention to the following points:
– ETI naj bi bil center odličnosti oziroma organ, ki bo usklajeval delovanje teh centrov pri izvajanju dejavnosti skupnosti znanja in inovacij (SZI).
- the EIT is intended to be a centre of excellence, or, alternatively, a body for coordinating centres of excellence through the activities of the Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs).
Z vzpostavitvijo kar najboljših delovnih pogojev za evropske raziskovalce, še zlasti s spodbujanjem njihove mobilnosti in širšega priznavanja njihovih kvalifikacij, bo inštitut lahko ne le ponudil konkretne rešitve za beg možganov, ampak tudi pritegnil najboljše svetovne raziskovalce in študente, ki bi v Evropsko unijo prišli po zaslugi povezanih partnerstev odličnosti v okviru trikotnika znanja.
By establishing the best possible conditions of work for European researchers, particularly by encouraging their mobility and facilitating the recognition of their qualifications, it may represent an effective solution to the brain drain, while also attracting the best researchers and students in the world to the EU thanks to integrated excellence-driven partnerships within the knowledge triangle.
Zato bi morali biti SZI vir za ustvarjanje blaginje in delovnih mest, kar pomeni, da morajo spodbujati ne le nastanek inovativnih malih in srednje velikih podjetij s področja najnovejših tehnologij, pač pa tudi novih oblik organizacij in podjetij.
The KICs should therefore be a source of wealth- and job-creation by engendering innovative SMEs in cutting-edge technology and promoting new forms of organisations and businesses.
– Proučiti inovativni proces pomeni upoštevati kulturno raznolikost in posebnosti, značilne za Evropo.
- In studying the innovation process, the cultural diversity and specific characteristics of Europe need to be taken into account.
Delovno okolje ETI bo večkulturno, zato lahko na inštitut gledamo kot na poroštvo boljšega razumevanja med državami članicami in instrument dobrega sodelovanja, s pomočjo katerega se bomo lažje zoperstavili nasprotjem, ki so posledica različnih interesov posameznih držav.
Thanks to its multi-cultural working environment, the EIT holds out the promise of better understanding between the Member States, by becoming an instrument for cooperation, enabling national conflicts of interest to be more easily overcome.
To bo dalje omogočilo, da ETI ponudi nove vrste usposabljanja, kot jih navajamo v predlogu spremembe 4 (uvodna izjava 10a novo).
It is thus also conceivable that the EIT will provide new types of courses as mentioned in Amendment 4 (recital 10a (new)).
– Poskrbeti je treba, da bo učinek inovacij optimalen, zato je prav, da se v upravnem odboru ETI posebno mesto nameni inženirjem, ki bi sodelovali pri pripravi strategij in po potrebi njihovi optimalni izvedbi na ravni SZI.
- In order to optimise the impact of innovation, a particular place should be accorded to engineers on the EIT's Governing Body, so that they can be involved in developing strategies and, if necessary, ensuring their optimum implementation in the KICs.