natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
„Nekatera vodilna podjetja so prostovoljno naredila korak naprej v procesu ter izločila bromove in klorove organske spojine, vendar to ne zadostuje, da bi rešili težave v dobavni verigi .
" Some leading companies have voluntarily taken the process one step ahead to phase-out brominated and chlorinated organic substances, but that is not enough for solving the problems in the supply chain.
Menimo, da le zakonodaja lahko privede do tega, do bo celotna dobavna veriga postopoma izločila nevarne snovi in proizvajala proizvode, ki jih ne bodo vsebovali.
We believe that only legislation can drive the whole supply chain to phase out hazardous substances and to produce HSF[hazardous substance free] products.
Acer bo proaktivno podpiral RoHS 2.0 za prepoved vseh organskih klorovih in bromovih kemikalij ter tako deloval v skladu s previdnostnim načelom in izpolnil svojo družbeno odgovornost.“
To abide by the precautionary principle and to fulfill our corporate responsibility, Acer will proactively support RoHS 2.0 for the ban of all organo- Cl/Br Chemicals. "
Okoljski napredek skupine Acer – proizvodi, ki ne vsebujejo halogenov
Acer Environment Progress - Halogen Free Products
Njeni prihodki leta 2008 so dosegli 16,65 milijard ameriških dolarjev.
Revenues in 2008 reached US$16.65 billion.
Po mnenju Komisije se samo v EU vsako leto proda približno 9,3 milijonov ton električne in elektronske opreme (EEO), največji delež tega pa so veliki gospodinjski aparati ter oprema za IT in telekomunikacije.
According to the Commission, every year, in the EU alone, an estimated 9,3 million tonnes of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) are sold annually, the biggest share of which are large household appliances and IT and telecommunication equipment.
Zaradi nenehne rasti trga in vedno krajših inovacijskih ciklov se oprema vedno hitreje nadomešča, odpadna električna in elektronska oprema (OEEO) pa je zato najhitreje rastoči tok odpadkov .
As the market continues to grow and innovation cycles become even shorter, the replacement of equipment accelerates, making waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) the fastest growing waste stream .
Po ocenah naj bi do leta 2020 skupna količina OEEO dosegla okrog 12,3 milijone ton.
WEEE arisings are estimated to grow to 12.3 million tonnes by 2020.
OEEO je zapleten tok odpadkov, ki vključuje tudi številne nevarne snovi.
WEEE is a complex waste stream, including several hazardous substances.
Te snovi ali produkti njihove pretvorbe se lahko izpustijo v okolje in škodujejo zdravju ljudi, zlasti če niso ustrezno obdelani.
These substances, or their transformation products, can be released into the environment and damage human health, especially if not treated appropriately.
Tveganje za zdravje ljudi in okolje še povečajo postopki reciklaže/predelave v državah v razvoju, ki niso v skladu s standardi.
Risks for human health and the environment are further increased by sub-standard recycling/recovery operations in developing countries.
Glede na člen 174(2) Pogodbe je treba okoljsko škodo prednostno odpravljati pri viru .
According to Article 174(2) of the Treaty , environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source .
V hierarhiji ravnanja z odpadki v okvirni direktivi o odpadkih je na prvem mestu preprečevanje, ki je med drugim opredeljeno kot določitev ukrepov za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov, ki bodo zmanjšali vsebnost nevarnih snovi v materialih in proizvodih.
The waste hierarchy in the waste framework directive gives first priority to prevention, which is defined inter alia as setting out waste prevention measures that reduce the content of harmful substances in materials and products.
Sedanja direktiva RoHS, sprejeta leta 2003, ki temelji na predlogu iz leta 2000, si je prizadevala za izključitev prve serije nevarnih snovi v EEO, natančneje nekaterih težkih kovin in dveh skupin bromiranih zaviralcev gorenja.
The current RoHS Directive, adopted in 2003, based on a proposal made in 2000, sought to phase-out a first series of hazardous substances in EEE, namely certain heavy metals and two groups of brominated flame retardants.
Posledica tega je bilo zmanjšanje uporabe in morebitnega izpusta v okolje teh snovi za več kot 100.000 ton.
It has led to a reduction of more than 100,000 tonnes of these substances being disposed of and potentially released into the environment.
RoHS je bila pomemben instrument ne le pri določitvi evropskega marveč tudi globalnega standarda za proizvajalce.
RoHS has been an important instrument in setting not just a European standard, but a global standard for manufacturers.
Ni preprečila stalnega razvoja novih proizvodov – ravno nasprotno, proizvodi so bili preoblikovani, da bi bili skladni z RoHS.
It has not prevented the continued development of new products but the opposite - products were redesigned to be compliant with RoHS.
Številna podjetja pa so to že presegla, tako da so izločila halogenirane spojine.
And many companies are already going beyond that to phase out the use of halogenated compounds.
Bistvena vprašanja
Key issues
Preoblikovanje je pomembna priložnost, da se naredi korak naprej v tem napredku .
The recast is an important opportunity to take this progress a step further .
Vaš poročevalec se bo osredinil na pojasnila v zvezi s predlaganimi novimi omejitvami, saj so bile te izrecno zahtevane na razpravi odbora 4. novembra 2009.
Your rapporteur will concentrate on explanations with regard to the new restrictions proposed, as these were specifically requested during the committee debate on 4 November 2009.
Druga bistvena vprašanja , na primer
The other key issues , such as
- odprto področje uporabe (člen 2)
- open scope (Article 2),
- razlikovanje med RoHS in REACH (uvodna izjava 8 in člen 4(7)),
- the differentiation between RoHS and REACH (Recital 8 and Art. 4(7)),
- spremembe meril za izjeme (člen 5(1)),
- modifications of the criteria for exemptions (Article 5(1)),
- merila za določitev trajanja izjeme/podaljšanja trajanja izjeme po preteku (člen 5(2)),
- criteria for deciding on the duration of an exemption/grace periods (Article 5(2)),
- postopek soodločanja za nadaljnje omejitve namesto postopka komitologije (člen 6),
- co-decision for future restrictions instead of comitology (Article 6)
je treba zadostno pojasniti v obrazložitvah zadevnih predlogov sprememb.
should be sufficiently explained in the justifications of the relevant amendments.
Predlogi posebnih določb o nanomaterialih bodo dodani januarja 2010 po dodatni oceni razmer.
Proposals for specific provisions on nanomaterials will be added in January 2010 following further evaluation of the situation.
Nove omejitve
New restrictions
Problem nevarnih snovi v EEO, zlasti glede obdelave odpadkov, z RoHS 1.0. ni bil rešen.
The problem of hazardous substances in EEE, in particular with regard to waste treatment, has not been solved with RoHS 1.0.
To je bilo sozakonodajalcu jasno že leta 2003.
This was clear for the co-legislator already back in 2003.
Člen 6 RoHS izrecno obvezuje Komisijo, da razišče izvedljivost zamenjave drugih nevarnih snovi in materialov, ki se uporabljajo v EEO, in da po potrebi predloži predloge za razširitev področja uporabe člena 4 .
Article 6 of RoHS explicitly obliges the Commission to examine the feasibility of replacing other hazardous substances and materials used in EEE and to present proposals to extend the scope of Article 4 , if appropriate.
a) Dokazi o negativnem učinku halogeniranih zaviralcev gorenja in PVC
a) Evidence about the negative impact of halogenated flame retardants and PVC
Komisija je preučila druge nevarne snovi in materiale.
The Commission did study other hazardous substances and materials.
Nemški inštitut za uporabno ekologijo Öko-Institut je pozvala, naj pregleda snovi, ki še niso vključene v RoHS, izbere snovi, ki bi jih lahko vključili v direktivo RoHS, oceni možne nadomestke ter predlaga politične možnosti za vsako izbrano snov
It asked the Öko-Institut to look at substances not yet regulated under RoHS, to select candidate substances for potential inclusion into the RoHS Directive, to evaluate possible substitutes, and to propose policy options for each candidate substance
Öko-Institut za Komisijo pregleduje izjeme iz člena 4 RoHS od leta 2005, zato ga lahko obravnavamo kot referenčni organ za omejitve v okviru RoHS.
The Öko-Institut is reviewing exemptions from Article 4 of RoHS since 2005 for the Commission - it can thus be considered to be a reference authority on RoHS restrictions.
Halogenirani zaviralci gorenja
Halogenated flame retardants
Študija navaja:
The study states the following:
„V tej študiji je bila obravnavana skupina bromovih in klorovih organskih spojin; avtorji močno priporočajo, da se jih izloči iz EEO“.
" the group of organobromine and organochlorine substances have been considered in the present study and their phase out from EEE is highly recommended by the authors ".
Poglavitni razlogi so:
The main reasons are the following:
- možnost nastanka dioksinov in furanov v primeru nenadzorovanega gorenja (naključno gorenje) in pri hkratnem sežiganju pri nižjih temperaturah ali v slabo delujočih sežigalnih napravah,
- the potential to form dioxins and furans in case of uncontrolled fires (accidental fire) and upon co-combustion at lower temperatures or in not well functioning incinerators,
- nastanku dioksinov in furanov ter dodatnih nevarnih proizvodov izgorevanja se lahko izognemo z uporabo naprednih tehnologij odlaganja.
- the formation of dioxins and furans and further hazardous combustion products can only be avoided by the application of advanced disposal technologies.
Vendar napredne tehnologije sploh ne obstajajo v vseh državah članicah EU, kaj šele v državah v razvoju .
However, advanced technologies do not even exist in all EU Member States, let alone in developing countries .
Kjer pa obstajajo, ni zahtevano, da se jih dejansko uporablja za te tokove odpadkov.
And where they exist, there is no requirement to actually use them for these waste streams.
Dodaten razlog za opustitev lahko najdemo v obrazložitvenem memorandumu predloga Komisije o OEEO in RoHS z dne 13. junija 2000
Further reasons for a phase-out can be found in the explanatory memorandum of the Commission proposal on WEEE and RoHS from 13 June 2000
KOM(2000) 347 konč. :
COM(2000) 347 final :
Halogenirane snovi v OEEO, zlasti bromirani zaviralci gorenja, so tudi zaskrbljujoči pri recikliranju plastike.
Halogenated substances contained in WEEE, in particular brominated flame retardants, are also of concern during ... plastic recycling.
Uporaba halogeniranih zaviralcev gorenja je neposredna ovira za reciklažo plastike v OEEO v celoti .
T he use of halogenated flame retardants is a direct impediment to recycling of plastics in WEEE as a whole .
Zgoraj navedene težave do sedaj niso bile rešene z izločitvijo le dveh skupin bromiranih zaviralcev gorenja (PBDE in PBB).
The problems above have not been solved by phasing out only two groups of brominated flame retardants (PBDE and PBB) to date.
Študija Komisije priporoča:
The Commission study makes the following recommendation:
„Izključitev PVC mora imeti prednost pred ukrepi za selektivno obvladovanje tveganja, da bi zagotovili manjši izpust PVC, njegovih aditivov in nevarnih proizvodov izgorevanja .“
" The phase out of PVC should ... have priority over selective risk management measures to guarantee a reduced release of PVC, of its additives and of hazardous combustion products ".
Evropska komisija je na osnovi petih študij že leta 2000 dobro dokumentirala težave v zvezi s PVC odpadki na splošno.
The problems of PVC waste in general have been well-documented by the European Commission already in 2000 based on five studies.
Izsledki so bili izrecno navedeni v obrazložitvenem memorandumu predloga iz leta 2000:
The findings were referred to explicitly in the Explanatory Memorandum of the proposal from 2000:
Rohr, Umwelt Wirschaftsforum, št. 1, 1992, je več kot 20 % plastike, uporabljene v električni in elektronski opremi PVC. .
According to M. Rohr, Umwelt Wirschaftsforum, No 1, 1992, more than 20% of the plastic used in electrical and electronic equipment is PVC. .
Obstajajo tehtni dokazi, ki podpirajo vidik, da PVC ni ustrezen za sežiganje, zlasti zaradi količine in nevarnosti ostankov zgorevalnih plinov, ki pri tem nastanejo.
There is substantial evidence supporting the view that PVC is not suitable for incineration, particularly in view of the quantity and the hazardous nature of the flue gas residues resulting from incineration.
Environmental aspects of PVC (Křbenhavn 1996), Danish Environmental Protection Agency Position Paper of the Netherlands on PVC (Haag 1997), Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
Environmental aspects of PVC (Copenhagen 1996), Danish Environmental Protection Agency Position Paper of the Netherlands on PVC (The Hague 1997), Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
The influence of PVC on quantity and hazardousness of flue gas residues from incineration, Study for DG ENV, Bertin Technologies, 2000.
The influence of PVC on quantity and hazardousness of flue gas residues from incineration, Study for DG ENV, Bertin Technologies, 2000.
Poleg tega je splošno znano, da pri odlaganju PVC, uhajajo mehčala, zlasti ftalati, ki lahko škodujejo zdravju ljudi in okolju.
In addition, losses of plasticizers, especially phthalates, from the landfilling of PVC are widely recognised and can have potential adverse effects on the human health and the environment.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da se sedaj reciklira zelo malo odpadkov PVC, zlasti iz OEEO
It should also be noted that very little PVC waste, in particular in WEEE, is currently recycled
Prognos, Study for DG XI, Mechanical recycling of PVC wastes, januar 2000. .
Prognos, Study for DG XI, Mechanical recycling of PVC wastes, January 2000. .
Žal so izsledki o PVC prišli prepozno, da bi ga vključili v RoHS.
Unfortunately, the evidence on PVC came too late for inclusion in RoHS.
Vendar težava še vedno obstaja, zato se je treba z njo spoprijeti takoj!
But the problem is still there - it needs to be tackled now!
b) Ukrepi proizvajalcev
b ) Action by manufacturers
Predelovalna industrija elektronike je že leta 2003 razumela težave halogeniranih snovi kot celote.
The electronics manufacturing industry already understood in 2003 the problems of halogenated substances as a whole.
Večja podjetja so samostojno ukrepala za prehod na zaviralce gorenja z nizko vsebnostjo halogenov (brez halogeniziranih zaviralcev gorenja in PVC)
Major companies took individual action to convert to low-halogen (free of halogenated flame retardants and PVC)
Zdaj je pobuda za to globalna in je že na napredni stopnji
There is now a global initiative to do so, and it is well advanced
Po mnenju organizacije Greenpeace je tržni delež takih proizvodov v segmentu prenosnih telefonov (Nokia, Sony Ericsson in Apple) že 50 %, pričakuje pa se, da bo v naslednjem letu ali dveh ta delež v sektorju novih osebnih računalnikov presegel 40 % (Acer in HP).
According to Greenpeace, the market share of such products is already at 50% for mobile phones (Nokia, Sony Ericsson and Apple), and expected to be at over 40% for new PCs in the next 1-2 years (Acer and HP).
Ta pobuda vključuje tudi dobavno verigo (na primer proizvajalce plastičnih komponent), ki prehaja na proizvajalce EEO drugih kategorij.
This initiative also includes the supply chain (e.g. manufacturers of plastic components), which in turn crosses over to manufacturers of EEE of other categories.
Če lahko industrija elektronike s svojimi zelo zapletenimi proizvodi v prihodnjih nekaj letih preide na zaviralce gorenja z nizko vsebnostjo halogenov, potem s tem ne bi smel imeti težav niti sektor bele tehnike.
If the electronics industry with its highly complex products can convert to low-halogen within the next few years, then it should be no problem for inter alia the fast moving white goods sector to do the same.
Kot primer, Electrolux na Švedskem ponuja hladilnike, ki ne vsebujejo PVC
As an example, Electrolux is offering PVC-free fridges in Sweden
Ko so taki ukrepi sprejeti na stopnji oblikovanja, to – po mnenju industrijskega sektorja – ne povzroči dodanih stroškov.
When such action is taken at the design stage, according to industry, it does not create extra costs.
Namesto tega bi tako družbi prihranili znatne stroške v smislu škode za zdravje in okolje.
Instead, it will save society significant costs in terms of damage to health and the environment.
Da bi pa bili resnično uspešni, gospodarski subjekti rabijo gotovost, ki se jo lahko najbolje zagotovi z jasnim zakonodajnim okvirom.
But to be truly successful, economic operators need certainty which is best provided by a clear legislative framework.
c) Podatki o nadomestkih
c ) Evidence about substitutes
Komisija meni, da razpoložljivi podatki ne omogočajo, da bi sprejeli odločitve glede dodatnih omejitev za halogenirane zaviralce gorenja.
The Commission argues that the available data does not allow deciding on further restrictions of halogenated flame retardants.
Obenem navaja, da so na voljo „ nekateri “ podatki o nadomestkih in da je bilo ugotovljeno, da ne predstavljajo nekaterih od nevarnosti (na primer obstojnost, bioakumulacija ali toksičnost za zaviralce gorenja, ki ne vsebujejo halogenov)
At the same time, they state that " some " information is available on the substitutes and that " it is settled that they do not present some of the hazards (such as persistence, bioaccumulation or toxicity for the halogen-free flame retardants ) "
Presoja učinka Komisije prenovitve Direktive RoHS, SEC(2008)2930 .
Commission Impact Assessment of the RoHS recast, SEC(2008)2930
Podobna nasprotja so več let obstajala glede opustitev prepovedi za snov DecaBDE.
There was a similar controversy over DecaBDE for many years.
Ko je bila zavržena razpoložljivost varnejših nadomestkov, je Komisija morala v študiji leta 2007 priznati, da na trgu obstajajo nadomestki in da lahko po podatkih iz literature vsaj nekateri od teh minimalno škodljivo vplivajo na okolje in zdravje ljudi .
Having disregarded the availability of safer substitutes, the Commission had to concede in a study in 2007 that " substitutes do exist on the market ... and that literature data suggest that potential adverse environmental and human health effects of at least some substitutes may be minimal ."
Posledično Komisija glede opustitve prepovedi za snov DecaBDE meni, da preostale negotovosti glede njene toksičnosti in degradacije med druge prepovedane snovi ter razpoložljivost nadomestkov na trgu opravičujejo ohranitev prepovedi za to snov
Consequently, for DecaBDE, the Commission considers that " the remaining uncertainties about its toxicity and degradation to other banned products, as well as the commercial availability of substitutes justify maintaining the ban on this substance "
Presoja učinka Komisije prenovitve Direktive RoHS, SEC(2008)2930 . .
Commission Impact Assessment of the RoHS recast, SEC(2008)2930 .
Težko je razumeti, zakaj enaka analiza enkrat vodi do prepovedi (DecaBDE), drugič v podobnem primeru pa ne (drugi halogenirani zaviralci gorenja).
It is difficult to understand why the same analysis should lead to a ban in one case (DecaBDE), but not in another similar case (other halogenated flame retardants).
Komisija ne dvomi v razpoložljivost varnejših nadomestkov za PVC v svoji presoji vpliva, temveč se samo sprašuje o stroških.
The Commission does not question the availability of safer substitutes for PVC in its impact assessment, but only raises cost issues.
Če bi zunanje stroške PVC internalizirali, bi bila njihova uporaba nedopustno draga.
If the external costs of PVC were internalised, its use would be prohibitively expensive.
To, da je PVC poceni, ne more biti argument proti njegovi zamenjavi, ker ustvarja znatne zunanje stroške zaradi številnih dobro dokumentiranih težav pri obdelavi PVC odpadkov.
The fact that PVC is cheap cannot be an argument against its replacement, when it creates significant external costs due to the manifold well-documented problems of PVC waste treatment.
Bolje preprečiti kot zdraviti.
Prevention is better than cure.
Bolje se je spoprijeti z okoljskimi težavami pri njihovem viru – to se namreč kot prednostna naloga zahteva v Pogodbi in izvaja v okvirni direktivi o odpadkih.
It is better to address environmental problems at the source - as indeed required as a priority by the Treaty and as implemented in the waste framework directive.
Vaša poročevalka torej predlaga, da se na osnovi
Therefore, your rapporteur suggests, based on
a) študij Komisije o RoHS, PVC in halogeniranih zaviralcih gorenja,
a) Commission studies on RoHS, PVC and halogenated flame retardants,
b) ukrepov gospodarskih subjektov in
b) actions by economic operators and
c) podatkov o nadomestkih
c) information on substitutes
izločijo bromirani in klorirani zaviralci gorenja ter PVC in njegovi škodljivi aditivi.
phasing out brominated and chlorinated flame retardants as well as PVC and its hazardous additives.
predsednik Odbora za okolje
Chair of the Committee on Environment,
javno zdravje in varnost hrane
Public Health and Food Safety
Zadeva: Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi (prenovitev)
Subject : Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast)
Odbor za pravne zadeve, ki mu predsedujem, je proučil navedeni predlog v skladu s členom 87 o ponovnem sprejetju pravnih aktov, ki ga je Parlament vključil v svoj poslovnik.
The Committee on Legal Affairs, which I am honoured to chair, has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to Rule 87 on Recasting, as introduced into the Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Odstavek 3 tega člena določa:
Paragraph 3 of that Rule reads as follows:
Na podlagi mnenja pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, katere predstavniki so se udeležili sestankov posvetovalne delovne skupine za proučitev prenovljenega predloga, in v skladu s priporočili poročevalca Odbor za pravne zadeve meni, da predlog ne določa bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v predlogu ali v mnenju pravne službe opredeljene kot take, in da je predlog, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih aktov z omenjenimi spremembami, zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb.
Following the opinion of the Legal Service, whose representatives participated in the meetings of the Consultative Working Party examining the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the draftsperson, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that the proposal in question does not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal or in the opinion of the Consultative Working Party and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those changes, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Potem ko je Odbor za pravne zadeve 11. novembra 2009 na seji proučil zadevo in o njej glasoval s 19 glasovi za in brez vzdržanih glasov
In conclusion, after discussing it at its meeting of 11 November 2009, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 19 votes in favour and no abstentions
Priloga: Mnenje posvetovalne delovne skupine
Encl.: Opinion of the Consultative Working Party.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment
KOM(2008) 809 končno z dne 3.12.2008 – 2008/0240 (COD)
COM(2008) 809 final of 3.12.2008 - 2008/0240 (COD)