natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zbirno poročilo o stanju ohranjenosti habitatnih tipov in vrst, kot zahteva člen 17 Direktive o habitatih (KOM (2009)0358 konč.) .
"Composite report on the Conservation Status of Habitats and Species as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive" (COM (2009)358 final .
Na področjih izobraževanja in obveščanja, varovalnih funkcij ter mestnih in primestnih gozdov je bilo storjenega le malo.
Little action has been taken on education and information, protective functions and urban and peri-urban forests.
To je v nasprotju s prednostnimi nalogami evropskih državljanov.
This is the inverse of the priorities of European citizens.
Po študiji Komisije o odnosu do gozdov sta ohranjanje in varovanje gozdov daleč najpomembnejši tematiki gozdarske politike (44 %), sledijo jima zdravje in onesnaženost gozdov (15,4 %), podnebne spremembe (12,5 %) ter gospodarsko izkoriščanje (8 %)
According to the Commission’s forest perception study, conservation and protection (44%) is considered to be by far the most important topic for forest policy followed by forest health and pollution (15.4%) climate change (12.5%) and economic use (8%)
Usklajevalni in komunikacijski ukrepi Akcijskega načrta za gozdove napredujejo počasi zaradi nezadostne podrejenosti nacionalnih gozdnih programov Stalnemu odboru za gozdarstvo.
FAP coordination and communication actions are progressing slowly due to insufficient submission of National Forest Programmes (NFPs) to the Standing Forestry Committee (SFC).
Vse države članice EU sodelujejo v procesu Forest Europe, ki je v zadnjih 20 letih razvil skupne pristope k trajnostnemu upravljanju gozdov.
All EU Member States partake in the Forest Europe process which, over the last 20 years, has developed common approaches on SFM.
Na tej osnovi bi lahko dejavno in preventivno trajnostno upravljanje gozdov, ki dopušča nacionalne in regionalne prednostne naloge, postalo obvezno na ravni EU.
Building on this work, active and preventive SFM, which allows for national and regional priorities, may become obligatory at the EU level.
Glede na napredno znanstveno delo konference Forest Europe bodo za njegovo uporabo potrebni minimalni stroški in upravno breme.
Given the advanced scientific work of Forest Europe, its application will entail minimum costs and administrative burden.
Kar zadeva politiko glede biomase, lahko vseevropsko ukrepanje omogoči doseganje skupnega varovanja okolja ob preprečevanju izkrivljanja notranjega trga
For biomass policies, “EU-wide action can ensure that common environmental protection is achieved while avoiding distortions in the internal market”
SEK(2010) 65 Delovni dokument služb Komisije – povzetek presoje vpliva – spremni dokument k poročilu Komisije o trajnostnih zahtevah glede uporabe trdnih in plinastih virov biomase v elektroenergetiki, ogrevanju in hlajenju KOM(2010)0011 konč. .
SEC(2010) 65 Commission Staff Working Document - Summary of the Impact Assessment - Accompanying document to the Report from the Commission on sustainability requirements for the use of solid and gaseous biomass sources in electricity, heating and cooling COM(2010) 11 final .
Poročevalec meni, da bi moralo biti to ukrepanje v obliki pravno zavezujočih meril trajnosti, temelječih na spremenjeni predpostavki o ogljični nevtralnosti in znanstveno utemeljeni metodologiji izračuna izpusta toplogrednih plinov, pri kateri so upoštevane večletna narava lesne biomase in spremembe pri izpustu zaradi sprememb pri rabi zemljišč in upravljanju gozdov.
Your Rapporteur’s view is that this action should take the form of legally binding sustainability criteria, based on a revision of the assumption of carbon neutrality and a scientifically sound GHG calculation methodology which accounts for the multi-annual nature of woody biomass and for emission changes due to changes in land use and forest management.
Razviti bi bilo treba tudi količnike za posredne spremembe v rabi zemljišč za vse oblike biomase.
ILUC factors for all forms of biomass should also be developed.
Upoštevaje zgoraj navedeno je vključitev sektorja rabe zemljišč, spremembe namembnosti zemljišč in gozdarstva v sistem trgovanja z emisijami EU, prvotno zasnovanega za letne emisije industrijskih obratov, vprašljiva zaradi težav z združljivostjo.
In view of the above, inclusion of the LULUCF sector in the EU ETS – primarily designed for annual emissions of industrial installations – is questionable, due to compatibility issues.
EU bi si morala na mednarodni ravni prizadevati za diverzificirane opredelitve gozdov na osnovi biomov, ki bi upoštevale biotsko raznovrstnost, tla in družbeno razsežnost ter se osredotočile na ohranjanje z ogljikom bogatih pragozdov.
Internationally, the EU should work towards diversified forest definitions on a biome basis which account for biodiversity, soil and the social dimension, and which focus on the conservation of carbon-rich old growth forests.
To je odločilnega pomena, da se prepreči preusmerjanje finančnih zavez za biotsko raznovrstnost in program REDD+ k vprašljivim projektom.
This is crucial for ensuring that financial commitments for biodiversity and REDD+ are not diverted to questionable projects.
Informacije o stanju gozdov: osnova za odločanje
Forest information: basis for decision-making
Informacije o stanju gozdov so pomanjkljive zaradi nezadostnih obveznosti financiranja in poročanja, kot jih predvideva Uredba št. 2152/2003, ki je prenehala veljati.
Forest information is insufficient due to a lack of financing and reporting obligations, as provided for in the expired Regulation 2152/2003.
To uredbo bi bilo treba ponovno uvesti ob upoštevanju informacijskih potreb glede podnebnih nevarnosti, pa tudi večje potrebe po zagotavljanju informacij zaradi konvencije o biotski raznovrstnosti in Okvirne konvencije ZN o spremembi podnebja (UNFCCC), da bi se natančno prikazale biotska raznovrstnost gozdov in spremembe v zalogi ogljika.
This Regulation should be reintroduced taking into account information needs for climate threats but also the increased need for information provision for the CBD and the UNFCCC, to accurately depict forests' biodiversity and carbon stock changes.
Zbiranje informacij na ravni EU bi moralo temeljiti na združljivih mehanizmih, usklajenih opredelitvah in primerljivih podatkih, pridobljenih od nacionalnih gozdnih inventarjev in drugih ustreznih virov.
EU-level information collection should be based on compatible mechanisms, harmonised definitions and comparable data from the National Forest Inventories and other relevant sources.
Informacije o stanju gozdov so pomembne tudi za okoljske račune, pobudo „BDP in več“ ter za uveljavitev plačil za ekosistemske storitve.
Forest information is also relevant for Environmental Accounts, the “GDP and beyond” initiative and the operationalisation of payments for ecosystem services (PES).
Okrepitev zmožnosti prilagajanja s pomočjo trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov
Enhancing adaptive capacity through SFM
Običajno razlikujemo med naravno zmožnostjo (ekosistema), ki sloni na genetski raznovrstnosti gozdov, vključno z biotsko raznovrstnostjo tal, in družbeno-gospodarsko zmogljivostjo gozdarskega sektorja v smislu znanja in izkušenj ter kapitalske intenzivnosti.
A common distinction is made between inherent (ecosystem) capacity , relying on the genetic diversity of forests, including soil biodiversity, and the socio-economic capacity of the forestry sector in terms of know-how and capital intensity.
Poročevalec priznava zmožnost prilagajanja gozdarstva EU, vendar ugotavlja, da se ta najbolj zanaša na naravne zmogljivosti gozdov: naknadni odzivi na različne nevarnosti so možni, vendar gospodarsko niso izvedljivi, ne za javne ne za zasebne akterje.
Your Rapporteur acknowledges the adaptive capacity of EU forestry noting, however, that it ultimately relies on the inherent capacity of forests: ex-post responses to various threats may be possible but not economically feasible, either for public or private actors.
Trajnostno upravljanje gozdov, osredotočeno na dolgoročno pridelovanje lesa, se izvaja v več, nikakor pa ne v vseh, državah članicah EU.
SFM focusing on long-term timber yield is practiced in several –but by no means all- EU Member States.
Dejavno in preprečevalno trajnostno upravljanje gozdov zagotavlja okvir, v katerem se upoštevajo nacionalne in regionalne prednostne naloge.
Active or preventive SFM provides a framework whereby national and regional priorities are respected.
Možnosti dejavnega prilagajanja se naslanjajo na naravno obnavljanje, genetsko raznovrstnost ter povečevanje strukturne raznovrstnosti in raznolikosti mešanice vrst kot na ukrepe za krepitev odpornosti gozdov ne glede na tip in usmerjenost upravljanja
Active adaptation options converge on natural regeneration, genetic diversity and increasing diversity in structure and species mixture as measures to enhance forest resilience, regardless of forest type and management orientation
Poročilo generalnemu direktoratu Evropske komisije za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja „Impacts of Climate Change on European Forests and Options for Adaptation“ (Učinki podnebnih sprememb na evropske gozdove in možnosti prilagoditve) (AGRI-2007-G4-06) .
Report to the European Commission DG for Agriculture and Rural Development “Impacts of Climate Change on European Forests and Options for Adaptation (AGRI-2007-G4-06) .
Dodatni ukrepi zajemajo tehnologijo za sečnjo in prevoz v borealnem območju ter upravljanje nakopičenega goriva v Sredozemlju.
Additional measures include harvest and transport technologies for the Boreal region and accumulated fuel management for the Mediterranean.
Poročevalec meni, da je krepitev odpornosti vseh ekosistemov stroškovno najučinkovitejši odziv na podnebne spremembe, ki zajema tako blaženje kot prilagajanje
Your Rapporteur takes the view that enhancing the resilience of all ecosystems is the most cost-effective response to climate change covering both mitigation and adaptation
Vloga ekosistemov pri blaženju posledic podnebnih sprememb)
The role of ecosystems in climate mitigation” ,
Svetovna banka (2009) „Convenient Solutions to an Inconvenient Truth: Ecosystem based Approaches to Climate Change“ (Prijetne rešitve za neprijetno resnico: ekosistemski pristopi k reševanju podnebnih sprememb)
World Bank (2009) “Convenient Solutions to an Inconvenient Truth: Ecosystem based Approaches to Climate Change” ,
Towards a Strategy on Climate Change, Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity (Pot k strategiji za podnebne spremembe, ekosistemske storitve in biotsko raznovrstnost) – dokument za razpravo, ki ga je pripravila ad hoc strokovna skupina za biotsko raznovrstnost, 2009
Towards a Strategy on Climate Change, Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity - A discussion paper prepared by the EU Ad Hoc Expert Working Group on Biodiversity, 2009 ,
TEEB (2009) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Climate Issues Update (Ekonomika ekosistemov in biotska raznovrstnost: posodobljeni pregled podnebnih vprašanj).
TEEB (2009) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Climate Issues Update.
Švedski nacionalni znanstveni svet za biotsko raznovrstnost, „Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Resilience - Governance for a Future with Global Changes“ (Biotska raznovrstnost, ekosistemske storitve in odpornost – upravljanje za prihodnost z globalnimi spremembami), 2009 , in da je širitev ustrezne baze znanja vseh zainteresiranih strani osnovni pogoj za upravljanje.
Swedish National Scientific Council on Biological Diversity “Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Resilience - Governance for a Future with Global Changes, 2009 and that broadening the relevant knowledge base of all stakeholders is a basic requirement for management.
Obvezno je sodelovanje med vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi ob upoštevanju vseh scenarijev, da se zagotovi skladnost glede na prilagoditvene potrebe vseh evropskih družb.
Cooperation among all stakeholders, taking into account all conceivable scenarios, must proceed urgently to ensure coherence in view of the adaptation needs of all European societies.
Nadaljnji prispevek EU k varstvu gozdov
Further EU contribution to forest protection
Politike držav članic zaradi podnebnih sprememb že po definiciji ne zadostujejo za varstvo gozdov.
By definition, climate change renders Member States’ policies insufficient for forest protection.
Tu je bistvenega pomena navzkrižna skladnost: vse oblike financiranja EU, ne glede na instrument, morajo upoštevati podnebne vidike in tudi biotsko raznovrstnost
Cross compliance is essential: all EU funding, regardless of the instrument concerned, must be climate-proof and also take into account biodiversity
Evropsko računsko sodišče št. 9/2004 o gozdarskih ukrepih v okviru politike razvoja podeželja (z odgovori Komisije) , razsežnost vode in potrebo po divjini
European Court of Auditors No 9/2004 on Forestry Measures within Rural Development Policy (together with the Commission’s replies)
Resolucija EP z dne 21. septembra 2010 o izvajanju zakonodaje EU s področja ohranjanja biotske raznovrstnosti ( P7_TA(2010)0325 ) .
EP Resolution of 21 September 2010 on the implementation of EU legislation aiming at the conservation of biodiversity ( P7_TA(2010)0325 ) , the water dimension and the need for wilderness
Nacionalni gozdni programi bi morali zajeti vsaj petletna obdobja, ki bi temeljila na natančnih in izmerljivih merilih za predhodno in naknadno oceno ter vključevala prilagodljivo in preventivno upravljanje gozdov.
NFPs should cover at least 5-year periods based on ex-ante and ex-post precise and quantifiable evaluation criteria and an integration of adaptive and preventive forest management.
Komisija bi morala izdati smernice za nacionalne gozdne programe, da bi se vključili v širši okvir prilagajanja gozdov.
The Commission should issue guidelines for NFPs with a view to their integration in a wider forest adaptation framework.
Glede na obseg nevarnosti in skupno gozdno površino EU bi bilo treba povečati financiranje za gozdove iz drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike, pogojeno z obstojem nacionalnih gozdnih programov in operativnih načrtov upravljanja, ki vključujejo strategijo EU za biotsko raznovrstnost in dolga obdobja za gozdarske projekte v trajnostnem upravljanju gozdov.
Given the scope of threats and total EU forest area, CAP financing through pillar 2 for forests should increase, subject to the existence of NFPs and operational management plans, which incorporate the EU biodiversity strategy and long timeframes for forestry projects in SFM.
Upravičenost do financiranja bi bilo treba razširiti na javne akterje in skupine proizvajalcev, pri čemer bi bilo treba preiti na plačila, vezana na površino, ter vključiti ukrepe ohranjanja in-situ in ex-situ.
Eligibility should be extended to public actors and producer groups, shifting to area-based remuneration and including in-situ and ex-situ conservation measures.
Dejavno trajnostno upravljanje gozdov bi bilo nedvomno treba vključiti v raziskave in prakso kot prednostno nalogo, hkrati pa bi moralo upoštevati dejstvo, da je 40 % gozdov EU v javni lasti.
Active SFM should be clearly mainstreamed and prioritised in research and practice , and should also take into account public ownership of 40% of EU forests.
Prakse ohranjanja vrst in drevesnic bi bilo treba razširiti na ustrezne vrste mikrobov in gliv.
Species conservation and nursery practices should extend to associated microbial and fungal species.
Dejavno bi bilo treba spodbujati raziskave mikorizne simbioze na terenu.
In situ research into mycorhizal symbiosis should be actively encouraged.
V prihodnjih finančnih perspektivah bi bilo treba uradno določiti plačila za ekosistemske storitve, in sicer na osnovi uspešnosti gozdnih in vodnih projektov
Payments for ecosystem services (PES) should be formalised in view of the next financial perspectives, building on the success of forest and water projects
Evropski regionalni urad IUCN, Center za okoljsko pravo IUCN, Konfederacija evropskih lastnikov gozdov, Final report study on the Economic value of groundwater and biodiversity in European forests, 2009 (Končno poročilo o študiji o gospodarski vrednosti podtalnice in biotske raznovrstnosti v evropskih gozdovih) .
IUCN Regional Office for Europe, IUCN Environmental Law Centre, Confederation for European Forest Owners Final report study on the Economic value of groundwater and biodiversity in European forests, 2009 .
Tudi politike civilne zaščite bi morale okrepiti varovalne funkcije gozdov, vključno z večjim pogozdovanjem za preprečitev poplavljanja, požarov in erozije.
Civil protection policies should also enhance the protective functions of forests including increasing forestation to prevent flooding, fires and erosion.
Nemudoma bi bilo treba ponovno vzpostaviti uredbo o preprečevanju požarov, ki bi presegala sedanje določbe o razvoju podeželja, pri čemer bi se bilo treba osredotočiti na upravljanje krajine in postopno uvedbo lokalnih vrst, odpornih proti požarom, na primer hrastov.
Reinstitution of the Fire Prevention Regulation, going beyond current rural development provisions, should proceed without delay, focusing on landscape management and the gradual introduction of fire-tolerant local species such as the Quercus Spp.
Pri oblikovanju sklada EU za prilagajanje bi bilo treba posebno pozornost posvetiti prilagajanju in odpornosti gozdov.
Forest adaptation and resilience should be given special consideration in the creation of an EU-adaptation fund.
Direktivo 105/1995, ki bi lahko v povezavi z na računih temelječem sistemu skupne kmetijske politike dala prednost proizvodnji pred prilagajanjem, bi bilo treba spremeniti tako, da se sprostijo pravila za trženje lokalnih vrst.
Directive 105/1995, which in conjunction with the invoice-based system of the CAP, may favour performance over adaptation, should be revised to relax the rules for the marketing of local species.
Osnovna skupna naloga, ki bo omogočila uspešnost skupnosti in gospodarskih dejavnosti, odvisnih od gozdarstva, je ohranjanje gozdnih genskih virov na terenu.
In-situ conservation of forest genetic resources is the basic collective endeavour which will allow forest dependent communities and industries to thrive.
2. poudarja, da bi morala strategija za gozdove ostati v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti prednostna naloga držav članic, Evropska unija pa bi jo morala dodatno podpirati; poudarja, da je treba ukrepe sprejemati na ustrezni lokalni ali regionalni ravni, ravni držav članic ali EU; poudarja da bi tak strateški okvir okrepil usklajenost nacionalnih ukrepov in ukrepov Skupnosti ter povečal ugled Evropske unije pri mednarodnih pogajanjih o boju proti podnebnim spremembam;
Points out that, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle, forest strategy should continue to be primarily a matter for the Member States, with additional support from the European Union; points to the need to take measures at an appropriate local, regional, Member State or EU level; stresses that such a strategy framework would enhance the coordination of national and Community measures and boost the image of the European Union in international negotiations on combating climate change;
6. meni, da je izkoriščanje gozdov tesno povezano s kmetijstvom, saj je v Evropi večina lastnikov gozdov tudi kmetov; priznava pa, da je gozdarstvo neodvisen sektor gospodarskih dejavnosti na podeželju, zlasti na območjih, ki so onkraj dosega kmetijstva ali so še posebej dragocena za ohranjanje narave in dejavnosti za prosti čas;
Points out that forestry is closely related to agriculture, given that most forest owners in Europe are also farmers; recognises, however, that forestry is an independent sector of the rural economy, especially in areas that are beyond the reach of agriculture or are particularly valuable for nature conservation and leisure activities;
9. poudarja, da so gozdovi glavni ponor ogljika in imajo zato bistveno vlogo v boju proti podnebnim spremembam; zato se mu zdi življenjsko pomembno, da Evropska unija uvede skupno strategijo za boj proti dejavnikom, ki povzročajo propadanje gozdov, kot so požari in onesnaževanje zraka;
Points out that forests represent the main carbon sink and therefore play a crucial role in the fight against climate change; therefore considers it vitally important for the European Union to launch a common strategy to combat factors that cause forest deterioration, such as fires and air pollution;
15. poudarja, da mora Komisija nemudoma obravnavati odstopanja med cilji zakonodaje, ki vplivajo na gozdove in kmetijsko politiko; poziva k povezovanju različnih politik EU, zlasti o gozdarstvu in kmetijstvu, pa tudi politik o energiji iz obnovljivih virov, biotski raznovrstnosti, industriji, raziskavah in strategiji EU2020;
Points out the need for the Commission to swiftly deal with the discrepancies between the objectives of legislation affecting forests and agriculture policy; calls for cohesion between different EU policies, especially on forestry and agriculture but also between policies on renewable energy, biodiversity, industry, research and the Europe 2020 Strategy;
18. meni, da sta glede na potrebo po učinkoviti raziskavi varovalnega potenciala gozdnih ekosistemov, prognostični raziskavi in raziskavi strategij za blažitev učinkov podnebnih sprememb za celoten gozdarski in lesarski sektor potrebna usklajenost in financiranje na ravni EU;
Considers that, given the need for effective research into the ‘defence potential’ of forest ecosystems, for prognostic research and for research into strategies for mitigating the effects of climate change for the entire forestry and timber sector, coordination and funding at EU level is required;
20. meni, da lahko EU podpira, usklajuje in dopolnjuje ukrepe držav članic za opredelitev smernic najboljše prakse in tako prispeva k odpornosti gozdov na posledice podnebnih sprememb, in da morajo biti te smernice prilagojene potrebam lastnikov in lokalnih skupnosti ter morajo temeljiti na načelih trajnostnega upravljanja; poudarja, da bo pretirana regulacija zmanjšala konkurenčnost lesnih izdelkov v primerjavi z neobnovljivimi in energijsko intenzivnimi materiali, kot so plastika, aluminij in beton, kar bo EU otežilo doseganje podnebnih ciljev;
Considers that the EU can support, coordinate and supplement actions taken by the Member States in order to identify best practice guidelines, so as to help ensure that forests are able to withstand the effects of climate change, and that such guidelines should be adapted to the needs of owners and local communities and based on the principles of sustainable management; stresses that excessive regulation will make timber products less competitive compared to non-renewable and energy-intensive materials, such as plastics, aluminium and concrete, and will thus make it more difficult for the EU to reach the climate targets;
23. prav tako poudarja pomembno vlogo kmetov pri preprečevanju požarov; zato meni, da je nujno zagotoviti, da bo kmetijstvo ostalo ekonomsko uspešna dejavnost, da bi zajezili opuščanje proizvodnje in izseljevanje podeželskih območij, saj bi to znatno poslabšalo požarne razmere;
Highlights, likewise, the crucial role played by farmers in preventing fires; therefore considers it necessary to ensure that farming remains a viable activity in order to curb the cessation of production and depopulation of rural areas, given that this would considerably aggravate the situation with regard to fires;
26. poudarja, da je treba za blažitev posledic podnebnih sprememb uvesti ukrepe, ki bodo prispevali k finančni stabilnosti naložb v gozdove, kot je na primer pomoč pri zavarovanju;
Stresses that in order to mitigate the consequences of climate change it is necessary to introduce measures to bolster the financial stability of investment in forestry, such as insurance assistance;
Spiros Danelis (Spyros Danellis), Bas Eickhout, Marian Harkin, Giovanni La Via, Véronique Mathieu, Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov), Milan Zver
Spyros Danellis, Bas Eickhout, Marian Harkin, Giovanni La Via, Véronique Mathieu, Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Dimitar Stoyanov, Milan Zver