natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
120. ugotavlja, da se EU približuje novi širitvi, zlasti proti zahodnemu Balkanu; zahteva, da naslednji večletni finančni okvir upošteva stroške prihodnjih širitev, zlasti z ustreznim financiranjem instrumenta predpristopne pomoči; meni, da mora instrument predpristopne pomoči dati prednost podpori potrebnim izboljšavam v državah kandidatkah, da bodo te izpolnile pravni red EU, in olajšati uporabo sredstev EU, predvsem za civilno družbo, socialne partnerje, manjšine, nevladne organizacije, kulturno dediščino ter lokalne in regionalne organe;
Notes that the EU is approaching a new round of enlargement, particularly in the direction of the Western Balkans; calls for the next MFF to take the costs of future enlargements into account, namely through adequate funding for the Instrument for Pre-Accession; considers that the IPA instrument should give priority to support the necessary improvements for candidate countries to comply with the acquis communautaire and facilitate the use of EU funding, in particular for civil society, social partners, minorities, NGOs, cultural heritage, as well as local and regional authorities;
122. meni, da je spričo rastočih svetovnih izzivov ter splošne odgovornosti Unije, zlasti ob trenutnih političnih dogodkih v arabskem svetu, nujno treba prestrukturirati zunanje finančne instrumente EU; zato zagovarja prenovo in bolj strateško uporabo zunanjih instrumentov ter v sodelovanju s partnerskimi državami razvoj novih oblik mehanizmov sodelovanja in zagotavljanja, da bi okrepili vpliv in prepoznavnost zunanjega delovanja EU ter dosegli splošni cilj večje skladnosti in povezanosti zunanjega delovanja EU; poudarja, da mora naslednji večletni finančni okvir podpirati skladnost politik, na primer tako, da zagotavlja, da politike in odhodki EU za kmetijstvo, ribištvo, trgovino in energijo niso neposredno v nasprotju s cilji razvojne politike;
Is of the opinion that, considering growing global challenges as well as the Union’s global responsibilities, especially in face of the current political developments in the Arab world, a restructuring of the EU’s external financial instruments becomes indispensible; advocates accordingly an overhaul and more strategic application of its external instruments as well as the development of new forms of cooperation and delivery mechanisms with partner countries in order to enhance the impact and visibility of EU external action as well as to achieve the overall objective of greater consistency and coherence of EU external action; stresses that the next MFF should support policy coherence, i.e. by ensuring that EU policies and expenditure on agriculture, fisheries, trade and energy are not directly at odds with development policy objectives;
Odzivanje na krizne razmere
Responding to crisis situations
125. meni, da so kakovostne javne uprave tako na ravni Unije kot na nacionalnih ravneh bistveni element za doseganje strateških ciljev, določenih v strategiji Evropa 2020; poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi jasno analizo upravnih odhodkov po letu 2013, ki bo ustrezno upoštevala prizadevanja za konsolidacijo javnih financ, nove naloge in pristojnosti, ki jih Uniji daje Lizbonska pogodba, ter izboljšanje učinkovitosti, ki bo izhajalo iz optimalne uporabe človeških virov, zlasti s prerazporeditvijo in novimi tehnologijami;
Believes that high quality public administrations, at both Union and national levels, are an essential element for achieving the strategic goals set in the Europe 2020 strategy; calls on the Commission to present a clear analysis of administrative expenditure post-2013, duly taking into account the public finances consolidation efforts, the new tasks and competences attributed to the Union by the Treaty of Lisbon, and the efficiency gains to be derived from an optimal use of human resources in particular through redeployment and new technologies;
Del IV: Organizacija in struktura finančnega okvira
Part IV: Organisation and structure of the financial framework
133. opozarja na težave, ki se pojavijo, če je več manjših programov združenih znotraj majhnega podrazdelka; zato predlaga, da se podrazdelka 3a (državljanstvo) in 3b (politike svobode, varnosti in pravice) iz večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013 združita v enotni podrazdelek;
Recalls the difficulties which arise when a number of rather small programmes are brought together within a small subheading; proposes, accordingly, to combine the 2007-2013 MFF subheadings 3a (citizenship) and 3b (freedom, security and justice policies) into a single subheading;
138. poziva Komisijo, naj v prilogi k proračunu EU navede vse odhodke EU, ki – po medvladnem postopku – nastanejo zunaj proračuna EU; meni, da bodo te letno posredovane informacije dale celotno sliko o vseh naložbah, o katerih se države članice dogovorijo na ravni EU;
Urges the Commission to provide in an annex to the EU budget all EU related expenditure that occurs –following an intergovernmental procedure- outside the EU budget; believes that this information provided on an annual basis will give a complete picture of all investments that Member States agree to undertake at the EU level;
Vključuje politike na področju raziskav in inovacij, izobraževanja in vseživljenjskega učenja ter politike notranjega trga
Including research and innovation, education and lifelong learning and internal market policies.
Vključuje kohezijsko (ekonomsko, socialno in teritorialno) in socialno politiko.
Including cohesion (economic, social and territorial) and social policies .
Vključuje kmetijsko, ribiško, okoljsko, podnebno, energetsko in prometno politiko ter politiko razvoja podeželja.
Including agriculture, rural development, fisheries, environment, climate change, energy, and transport policies.
Vključuje kulturno, mladinsko in komunikacijsko politiko ter politike temeljnih pravic, svobode, varnosti in pravice.
Including culture, youth, communication and fundamental rights and freedom, security and justice policies.
Vključuje zunanje delovanje, sosedsko in razvojno politiko.
Including external action, neighbourhood and development policies.
Odzivanje na spremenljive okoliščine: prilagodljivost
Responding to changing circumstances: flexibility
95 , da je večja prilagodljivost znotraj razdelkov in med njimi absolutno potrebna za zmožnosti delovanja Unije, ne samo za soočanje z novimi izzivi, ampak tudi za olajšanje postopka sprejemanja odločitev znotraj institucij;
95. , that more flexibility within and across headings is an absolute necessity for the functioning capacities of the Union not only to face the new challenges but also to facilitate the decision-making process within the institutions;
Vmesni pregled
Mid-term Review
Revizija zgornjih meja
Revising the ceilings
Zagotavljanje zadostnih rezerv in prilagodljivosti pod zgornjimi mejami
Ensuring sufficient margins and flexibility below the ceilings
154. ugotavlja, da so bila v zadnjih letih sredstva za soočanje z nujnimi naravnimi nesrečami in humanitarnimi katastrofami nezadostna; zato poziva k občutnemu povečanju sredstev za rezervo za nujno pomoč ter k možnosti večletne vključitve tega instrumenta;
Notes that in recent years the funds available to address urgent natural and humanitarian disasters have been insufficient; calls, accordingly, for a substantial increase of the envelope of the Emergency Aid Reserve as well as the possibility for a multi-annual mobilisation of the instrument;
155. poudarja, da bi odločitev o trajanju naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira morala najti pravo ravnovesje med stabilnostjo za programske cikluse in izvajanjem posameznih politik ter trajanjem političnih ciklusov institucij – zlasti tistih v Evropski komisiji in Evropskemu parlamentu; opozarja, da daljše obdobje zahteva večjo prilagodljivost;
Underlines that the choice of the duration of the next MFF should strike the right balance between stability for programming cycles and implementation of individual policies, and the duration of the institutions’ political cycles –in particular those in the European Commission and the European Parliament-; recalls that a longer period requires greater flexibility;
159. meni, da odločitev o novem sedemletnem večletnem finančnem okviru ne bi smela izključiti možnosti odločitve za petletno ali 5+5 obdobje po letu 2021; ponavlja svoje prepričanje, da bo uskladitev finančnega načrtovanja z mandatom Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta okrepila demokratično odgovornost, dolžnost in legitimnost;
Believes that a decision on a new 7-year MFF should not pre-empt the possibility of opting for a 5 or 5+5 year period as of 2021; reiterates its conviction that a synchronisation of the financial programming with the mandate of the Commission and the European Parliament will increase democratic responsibility, accountability and legitimacy;
DEL V: Usklajevanje ambicij s sredstvi: povezava med odhodki in reformo financiranja EU
Part V: Matching ambitions with resources: the link between expenditure and the reform of EU financing
Zadostna proračunska sredstva
Sufficient budgetary resources
161. poudarja, da ne glede na možne prihranke, proračun EU pri svoji trenutni ravni 1 % BND ne more zapolniti finančne vrzeli, ki je posledica dodatnih potreb po financiranju, ki izhajajo iz Pogodbe in obstoječih političnih prednostnih nalog ter obveznosti EU, kot so:
Emphasises that regardless of realisable savings, the EU budget, at its current overall level of 1 % of GNI, is not capable of closing the financing gap deriving from additional financing needs arising from the Treaty as well as from existing policy priorities and commitments such as:
– doseganje glavnih ciljev Evropa 2020 na področju zaposlovanja, raziskav in razvoja, podnebja in energetike, izobraževanja in izkoreninjenja revščine;
- the achievement of the Europe 2020 headline targets in the fields of employment, R&D, climate and energy, education and poverty reduction;
– povečanje porabe za raziskave in inovacije s trenutnih 1,9 % BDP na 3 % BDP, kar pomeni povečanje v višini približno 130 milijard EUR na področju javne in zasebne porabe letno;
- the increase of research and innovation spending from currently 1.9 % of GDP to 3 % of GDP, adding up to approximately EUR 130 billion of public and private spending per year;
– potrebna vlaganja v infrastrukturo; bistveno popolno in pregledno izračunano financiranje velikih projektov, ki jih je sprejel Svet, na primer ITER, Galileo in evropska vesoljska politika;
- the necessary investments in infrastructure; the essential fully-fledged and transparently calculated financing of large-scale projects adopted by the Council such as ITER and Galileo as well as the European space policy;
– dodatna proračunska sredstva – ki jih še ni mogoče količinsko opredeliti – na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike, vključno z Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje in evropsko sosedsko politiko;
- the not yet quantifiable additional appropriations needed in the field of Common Foreign and Security Policy, including the European External Action Service and the European Neighbourhood Policy;
– potrebe po dodatnih sredstvih, povezane s prihodnjo širitvijo EU;
- the additional financing needs related to the future enlargement of the EU;
– financiranje obstoječega evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo in evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost po letu 2013, da bi območju evra in EU zagotovili fiskalno stabilnost, potrebno za izhod iz krize državniškega dolga;
- the financing of the existing European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism and the European Stability Mechanism after 2013 in order to provide the Eurozone and the EU with the fiscal stability required in order to overcome the debt crisis;
– finančna prizadevanja, povezana z doseganjem razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, da bi za razvojno pomoč porabili 0,7 % BND, torej približno 35 milijard EUR na leto dodatno k trenutni porabi v višini 0,4 % BND;
- the financial effort related to the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to spend 0.7 % of GNI on development aid, i.e. around EUR 35 billion annually further to the current spending of 0.4 % of GNI;
– zaveze, ki izhajajo iz dogovorov iz Københavna in Cancuna, s katerimi se želi pomagati državam v razvoju pri boju s podnebnimi spremembami in prilagajanju na njihove učinke, ki bi morale biti nove ter dopolnjevati zaveze v okviru razvojnih ciljev tisočletja ter do leta 2020 znašati do 100 milijard dolarjev letno, od katerih bi približno tretjino morala nositi EU;
- the pledges resulting from the Copenhagen and Cancun agreements aimed at helping developing countries combat climate change and adapt to its effects which should be new and additional to the commitments made under the MDG and amount by 2020 to 100 billion dollars annually around a third of which to be shouldered by the EU;
Raven 2013: 1,06 % BND; raven 2013 + 5 %: 1,11 % BND; oboje v sredstvih za prevzem obveznosti v stalnih cenah za leto 2013.
2013 level: 1,06 % of GNI; 2013 level + 5%: 1,11 % of GNI; both in commitment appropriations at 2013 constant prices.
Številke temeljijo na domnevi sedemletnega večletnega finančnega okvira z uporabo naslednjih načrtov prihodkov in odhodkov ter napovedi Komisije:
These figures are based on the assumption of a 7 year MFF using the following estimates and forecasts by the Commission:
napoved GD BUDG iz maja 2011 glede BND za leto 2012: 13.130.916,3 milijonov EUR (cene iz leta 2012);
- DG BUDG’s May 2011 forecast of 2012 GNI: EUR 13.130.916,3 million (2012 prices);
napoved GD ECFIN iz januarja 2011 glede nominalne rasti BND za 1,4 % za obdobje 2011–2013 in 1,5 % za obdobje 2014–2020.
- DG ECFIN’s January 2011 estimate of GNI nominal growth of 1,4% for 2011-2013 and 1,5% for 2014-2020.
Opomba: številke se lahko spremenijo zaradi spremembe načrta prihodkov in odhodkov ter napovedi Komisije, prav tako zaradi spremembe uporabljenega referenčnega leta in vrste cen (tekoče ali stalne). , se za doseganje dogovorjenih ciljev Unije, za obveznosti in za načelo solidarnosti Unije lahko nameni le omejen finančni prispevek; zato je prepričan, da je treba za naslednji večletni finančni okvir nameniti vsaj 5 % več sredstev; poziva Svet, naj, če se ne strinja s tem pristopom, jasno opredeli, katere od njegovih političnih prednostnih nalog ali projektov je mogoče povsem opustiti, kljub njihovi dokazani evropski dodani vrednosti;
NB: Figures are subject to change in line with variations of the Commission’s estimates and forecasts as well as with the reference year and type of prices used (current or constant). only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union’s agreed objectives and commitments and the principle of Union solidarity; is, therefore, convinced that at least a 5% increase of resources is needed for the next MFF; challenges the Council, in case it does not share this approach, to clearly identify which of its political priorities or projects could be dropped altogether, despite their proven European added value;
1,23 % celotnega BND držav članic za sredstva za plačila in 1,29 % za sredstva za prevzem obveznosti. soglasno določena, zagotavlja zadosten proračunski manevrski prostor za soočanje z najnujnejšimi izzivi Unije, to še vedno ne bo zadosti za to, da bi proračun EU postal pravo orodje za evropsko gospodarsko upravljanje ali za pomemben prispevek k vlaganju v strategijo EU 2020 na ravni EU;
1.23 % of the total GNI of the Member States in payment appropriations and 1,29 % in commitment appropriations provides sufficient budgetary leeway to meet the most pressing Union challenges but that it would still be insufficient for the EU Budget to become a real tool for European economic governance or to contribute in a major way to investing in the Europe 2020 strategy at EU level;
165. opozarja, da se v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo „brez vpliva na druge prihodke proračun v celoti financira iz lastnih sredstev“; poudarja, da način, kako se je sistem lastnih sredstev razvijal in prava lastna sredstva postopno nadomestil s tako imenovanimi „nacionalnimi prispevki“, nesorazmerno poudarja neto razlike med prihodki in odhodki držav članic in tako nasprotuje načelu solidarnosti EU ter slabi evropski skupni interes in v veliki meri zanemarja evropsko dodano vrednost; opozarja, da to stanje v praksi pomeni, da na velikost proračuna vplivajo finančne razmere posameznih držav članic kot tudi njihov odnos do EU; zato odločno poziva k poglobljeni reformi sredstev EU, da bi tako financiranje proračuna EU uskladili z duhom in zahtevami Pogodbe;
Recalls that according to the Treaty of Lisbon ‘without prejudice to other revenue, the budget shall be financed wholly from own resources’; stresses that the way the system of own resources has evolved, gradually replacing genuine own resources by the so-called ‘national contributions’, places disproportionate emphasis on net-balances between Member States thus contradicting the principle of EU solidarity, diluting the European common interest and largely ignoring European added value; notes that, in practice, this state of affairs means that the size of the budget is affected by the financial circumstances of individual Member States, as well as their attitude towards the EU; strongly calls, therefore, for an in-depth reform of EU resources in order to realign the financing of the EU budget with the spirit and requirements of the Treaty;
Del VI: Nemotenemu in učinkovitemu postopku medinstitucionalnih pogajanj naproti
Part VI: Towards a smooth and efficient interinstitutional negotiation process
Pismo predsednika vlade Yvesa Letermeja predsedniku Buzeku z dne 8. decembra 2010. , da bodo zagotovila odprt in konstruktiven dialog ter sodelovanje s Parlamentom v celotnem postopku sprejetja prihodnjega večletnega finančnega okvira, ter potrjuje svojo pripravljenost za tesno sodelovanje s Svetom in Komisijo, popolnoma v skladu z določbami Lizbonske pogodbe, v tem pogajalskem procesu;
Letter of Prime Minister Yves Leterme to President Buzek, 8 December 2010. to ensure an open and constructive dialogue and collaboration with the Parliament during the whole procedure for the adoption of the future MFF and reaffirms its willingness to work in close cooperation with the Council and the Commission in full accordance with the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon during the negotiating process;
Poročevalec s tem osnutkom poročila poskuša izluščiti in oblikovati zaključke iz dosedanjih razprav v Odboru za politične izzive s ciljem zagotoviti prve odgovore in politične usmeritve o več zadevah v pristojnosti Komisije.
The rapporteur has attempted with this Draft Report to distil and draw conclusions from the discussions held at the SURE Committee so far with the aim of providing first answers and political orientations on the several issues included in the Committee’s mandate.
Ker odbor še ni končal s preučevanjem vseh teh vidikov, cilj vsebine tega osnutka poročila ni oblikovati končna stališča, ampak ponuditi uravnoteženo osnovo, na podlagi katere bi bilo mogoče v Parlamentu doseči široko soglasje.
Whereas the Committee has not yet completed the examination of all these aspects, the content of this Draft Report does not aim at formulating final positions but offering a balanced basis from which a large consensus in Parliament could be built.
Evropejci še nikoli niso bili zahtevnejši do EU in bolj kritični do njenega delovanja.
Never have Europeans become more demanding of the EU and also more critical of its performance.
Javnost se bo z Unijo ponovno poistovetila šele, ko bodo njeni državljani prepričani, da Unija bolje streže njihovim vrednotam in interesom.
Public ownership of the EU will only return when our citizens are confident that their values and interests are better served by the Union.
Naslednji večletni finančni okvir bi moral evropskim državljanom pokazati, da je Unija sposobna razmišljati in ravnati v njihovem dolgoročnem interesu ter zagotavljati učinkovite rezultate na področju zagotavljanja zanesljive rasti in notranje kohezije.
The next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) should be instrumental in showing European citizens that the Union has the capacity to think and act in their long-term interests and to produce effective results in securing solid growth and internal cohesion.
Kriza in stroge omejitve javne porabe so v nekaterih državah članicah otežile zagotavljanje zadostnih sredstev ne le za razvoj lastnih gospodarstev, ampak tudi za podporo njihovega polnopravnega sodelovanja na notranjem trgu.
The crisis and severe constraints in public spending have made it more difficult for some Member States to provide sufficient funding not only to develop their own economies but also to help them participate fully in the internal market.
To je eden od razlogov, zakaj je ukrepanje EU danes bolj potrebno kot kadar koli prej.
This is one of the reasons why EU action is today more necessary than ever.
Evropska unija, ki jo pri njenem delovanju manj omejujejo dnevne gospodarske, finančne in politične razmere, lahko najbolje opravlja dolgoročno načrtovanje in vključuje potrebna sredstva.
The EU which is less constrained in its actions by day-to-day economic, financial, and political realities is best placed to carry out long-term planning and to mobilise the required spending.
Vloga proračuna EU
The role of the EU budget
V okoliščinah, ko številne države članice izvajajo zahtevne fiskalne prilagoditve, mora biti proračun EU utemeljen bolje kot kadar koli prej.
In a context where many Member States are undertaking difficult fiscal adjustments, the case for the EU budget has to be better justified than ever.
Proračun EU bi moral zagotoviti najvišjo stopnjo evropske dodane vrednosti, moral bi biti dobro voden in zagotoviti kar največ javnih in zasebnih sredstev.
The EU budget should provide the highest degree of European added value (EAV), be managed soundly, and leverage as much public and private resources as possible.
Izzivi in politične prednostne naloge
Challenges and political priorities
Ne glede na to, ali gre za relativno demografsko in gospodarsko upadanje, podnebne spremembe ali pomanjkanje energije, lahko izzive pravilno razumemo in se nanje odzivamo le, če jih umestimo v regionalni in globalni okvir.
Whether we look at relative demographic and economic decline, climate change or energy shortages the challenges can only be properly understood and tackled when situated in a regional and global context.
In prav tu lahko EU kot subjekt, ki je veliko več kot zgolj skupek držav članic, najbolje pokaže svojo vrednost.
This is where the EU as an entity, which is much more than the sum of its Member States, can demonstrate its value.
To bo mogoče samo, če bomo delovali skupaj, saj so prihodnji izzivi prezahtevni, da bi jih posamezne države članice lahko rešile same.
Success will only be possible if we work together; the challenges ahead are too large for any European country to address on their own.
Odgovor EU na te izzive je strategija Evropa 2020.
The EU response to these challenges is the Europe 2020 strategy.
Strategija, ki naj bi z ustvarjanjem delovnih mest ter premišljeno, trajnostno in vključujočo rastjo Evropi pomagala, da iz krize izide močnejša.
A strategy that should help Europe recover from the crisis and come out stronger, through job creation and smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Poročevalec zato meni, da bi strategija Evropa 2020 morala biti referenca politik za naslednji večletni finančni okvir in da bi ta moral odražati ambicije strategije.
The rapporteur therefore believes that the Europe 2020 strategy should be the policy reference of the next MFF and that it should reflect the ambitions of the strategy.
Večletni finančni okvir bi poleg tega moral odražati začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, ki krepi politike EU in ustvarja nova področja pristojnosti.
The MFF should, additionally, reflect the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon that strengthens EU policies and creates new fields of competence.