natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Popolna vključitev prevoza v problematiko trgovina-podnebje
Full inclusion of transport in the problem area of trade and climate issues
54. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj naredijo vse, kar je v njihovi moči, da bi v okviru Mednarodne pomorske organizacije dosegle pravno obvezujoč sporazum o zmanjšanju emisij ladij;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to do everything under their power to achieve a legally binding agreement on the reduction of shipping emissions in the context of the International Maritime Organisation;
57. obžaluje, da precejšni del mednarodne trgovine predstavljajo homogeni izdelki, ki bi se jih lahko proizvajalo na lokalni ravni, in da prevoz, ki je za to potreben, ne krije lastnih okoljskih stroškov;
Regrets that a significant part of international trade consists of homogeneous products which could just as easily be produced locally and that the transport required does not bear its own environmental costs;
Povečanje usklajenosti med trgovino in podnebjem
Strengthening tools that ensure consistency between trade and climate
61. poziva Komisijo, naj v trgovinske sporazume, sklenjene z državami, ki niso članice EU, vključi okoljske klavzule, s posebnim poudarkom na zmanjšanju emisij CO2 in prenosu tehnologije z nizkimi emisijami;
Calls on the Commission systematically to include environmental clauses in trade agreements concluded with non-EU countries, with particular regard to reducing CO2 emissions and the transfer of low-emission technology;
63. zahteva, da se bilanca in nadomestni ukrepi vključijo v poglavje o podnebju, ki naj postane obvezno za vsak trgovinski sporazum (sporazumi o izmenjavi, ekonomskem partnertsvu, reforma splošne sheme preferencialov), ter naj se o tem poglavju organizira javna razprava in naj bo predstavljeno v Parlamentu;
Asks that this balance and these compensatory measures feature in a ‘climate chapter’ that is compulsory for all trade agreements (free trade agreements, economic partnership agreements, reform of the generalised system of preferences), and this chapter be subject to public consultation and be presented to Parliament;
Usklajenost med trgovino in podnebjem v Evropski uniji s stališča držav v razvoju
EU consistency on climate and trade from the viewpoint of developing countries
71. opozarja na obljubo industrializiranih držav, med katerimi so države članice Unije, da bodo razmislile o inovativnem financiranju boja proti podnebnim spremembam, zlasti o obdavčitvi finančnih transakcij; poziva Komisijo, naj Svetu in Parlamentu kmalu predloži predlog za uvedbo takega davka v Uniji; poziva Komisijo, naj v trgovinska pogajanja o liberalizaciji finančnih storitev vključi možnost takega mehanizma;
Recalls the commitment made by industrialised countries, including the EU Member States, to reflect on innovative funding to combat climate change, and in particular taxes on financial transactions; calls on the Commission to come up quickly with proposals to Council and Parliament on the introduction of this type of tax at EU level; calls on the Commission to incorporate the prospect of such a mechanism in trade negotiations on the liberalisation of financial services;
74. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje predsedniku Evropskega sveta, Svetu in Komisiji, nacionalnim parlamentom, izvršni sekretarki okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o podnebnih spremembah in 16. konferenci pogodbenic (COP 16).
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the President of the European Council, the Council, the Commission, the national parliaments, the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and to the 16th Conference of the Parties (COP 16).
EU še zdaleč ni edina, ki je odgovorna za to, vendar je bila zaradi pomanjkanja enotnosti, nezmožnosti enotnega stališča, nezmožnosti, da privede cilje za zmanjšanje emisij in podporo državam v razvoju na raven, ki jo priporočajo znanstveniki in ki jo zahteva Evropski parlament, pogosto neslišna in neučinkovita.
The EU is far from being the main culprit for this failure, but it was often inaudible and ineffective because of its lack of unity, its inability to speak with one voice and its inability to adopt targets for reducing emissions and supporting developing countries that were up to the level of scientists’ recommendations and Parliament’s requests.
Zakaj tolikšne težave?
Why some many difficulties?
Zagotovo ni enotnega odgovora, vendar dobršen del težave predstavlja dejstvo, da številne države še niso v velikem obsegu preizkusile ekološkega preoblikovanja svojih gospodarstev ter dvomijo o gospodarskih, socialnih ali demokratičnih prednostih takega koraka, kljub številnim študijam in uspešnim preizkusom s področja prehoda na trajnostno oskrbo z energijo, trajnostno kmetijstvo in bolj trajnostne oblike prometa.
There is certainly no single answer, but a major part of the problem stems from the fact that many countries have not yet made any great efforts in the direction of the ecological transformation of their economies and remain sceptical about the economic, social or democratic benefits of such action, despite the plethora of studies and success stories in the areas of energy transition, agriculture and more sustainable transport.
Danes Evropsko unijo mika neaktivnost.
The European Union is currently tempted to do nothing.
Nekateri sektorji industrije, ki se jim priključujejo nekatere vlade, se sklicujejo na morebitne dramatične posledice ambiciozne podnebne politike.
Some sectors of industry, with strong backing from governments, claim that an ambitious climate policy may have dramatic consequences.
Čeprav uradne študije ne potrjujejo te globalne grožnje in opozarjajo, da obstajajo sredstva za zaščito proti selitvi virov CO2, ambicije v zvezi s podnebjem naj ne bi bile skladne z izhodom iz gospodarske in socialne krize.
With official studies refuting this global threat and pointing out that instruments exist to protect against carbon leakage, it is claimed that an ambitious climate policy would impede efforts to overcome the economic and social crisis.
Gre za hudo napako, ki je Kitajska in Združene države Amerike ne delajo, kot kažejo njihovi načrti za ponovni vzpon gospodarstva, ki so namenjeni okolju prijaznemu gospodarstvu.
This is a serious mistake that is not being made by China and the USA, as can be seen from the proportion of their economic recovery plans devoted to the green economy.
S prevzemom vodilne vloge v boju proti podnebnim spremembam bi Evropska unija povečala konkurenčnost svojega gospodarstva, zahvaljujoč se prihranku energije in obnovljivim virom energije, dvema sektorjema, ki ji omogočata, da izboljša zanesljivo oskrbo z energijo, in imata velik potencial za gospodarski razvoj, inovacije, ureditev ozemlja in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest.
If the European Union were to assume leadership in the battle against climate change, it would strengthen the competitiveness of its economy by means of energy savings and renewable energies, two sectors that can help improve its energy security and have massive potential in terms of industrial development, innovation, regional development and job creation.
EU se mora nujno osredotočiti na te „izmenjane“ emisije, sicer bo izgubila vso mednarodno verodostojnost.
The EU has no choice but to do something about these ‘traded’ emissions, otherwise it risks losing all its international credibility.
Evropa, ki financira boj proti krčenju gozdov na eni strani, na drugi strani pa spodbuja krčenje gozdov z uvozom gozdnih proizvodov in netrajnostnih agrogoriv, ne more biti vodja boja proti podnebnim spremembam.
A Europe that funds efforts to combat deforestation on the one hand, whilst encouraging deforestation by importing timber products and non-sustainable agrifuels on the other, cannot play the lead role in combating climate change.
Poleg tega, če eksternalizira svoje emisije, namesto da bi spremenila način proizvodnje in porabe, ne bo imela gospodarskih, industrijskih in socialnih prednosti, ki so s tem povezane.
Furthermore, if it externalises its emissions rather than transform its modes of production and consumption, it will not derive any benefit from the economic, industrial or social advantages that accrue from these measures.
EU mora torej izboljšati svojo trgovinsko politiko tako, da bo razlikovala proizvode glede na njihov vpliv na okolje ter spodbujala potrebne spremembe v načinih proizvodnje in porabe ter naložbene strategije.
The EU has to adjust its trade policies towards some form of discrimination of products on the basis of their climate impact, thus stimulating the paradigm shifts required in methods of production and consumption and investment strategies.
Odzvati se mora na problematiko selitve virov CO2 ter na splošno nadzorovati vpliv na podnebje, ki ga ima njen uvoz.
It has to tackle the problem of carbon leakage and, more generally, monitor the climate impact of its imports.
Ne sme spet ogroziti podnebne politike svojih trgovinskih partnerjev, da bi kratkoročno povečala evropske tržne deleže.
It should not call into question the climate policies pursued by our trading partners in a short-sighted attempt to boost Europe’s market share.
Biti mora aktivna na področju emisij, ki nastajajo pri mednarodnem prevozu, predlagati sistem zaščite inovacij, ki bo skladen z dostopom (zlasti za države v razvoju) do tehnologij, prijaznih do podnebja, braniti nastanek inovativnih finančnih mehanizmov na mednarodni ravni ter jih predhodno uvesti na ravni Unije, če je to potrebno.
It should be active with regard to emissions from international transport, propose an innovation protection system that is compatible with access to climate-friendly technologies, particularly for developing countries, and defend the establishment of innovative funding mechanisms at international level by introducing these at EU level, before anyone else if necessary.
Te dejavnosti mora EU začeti s svojimi trgovinskimi partnerji, zlasti z državami v razvoju, in ne proti njim.
The EU should set out on this mission in tandem with, and not in opposition to, our trading partners, particularly the developing countries.
To se zdi na videz težko, vendar je EU že naredila prve korake v pravo smer: v zvezi z nezakonitim uvozom lesa, agrogorivi, letalskimi emisijami.
This is obviously a tough mission, but the EU has already taken the first steps in the right direction: on imports of illegal timber, on agrifuels, and on aviation emissions.
Poročilo je plod številnih razprav s podjetji, združenji, sindikalnimi delavci in Komisijo ter skuša ugotoviti, kateri so dodatni koraki, ki bi EU omogočili, da nadaljuje na tej poti.
This report, which is the outcome of extensive discussions with companies, associations, trade union representatives and the Commission, seeks to identify the next stages that will enable the EU to continue along this path.
o mednarodni trgovinski politiki v okviru zahtev glede podnebnih sprememb
on international trade policy in the context of Climate Change imperatives
3. obžaluje, da morajo članice WTO šele najti način, kako vključiti to pogodbo v sistem institucij OZN in v zakonodajo o varovanju okolja, tudi o podnebnih spremembah, ter o socialni pravičnosti in spoštovanju vseh človekovih pravic; vztraja, da morajo imeti obveze in cilji iz večstranskih okoljskih sporazumov, kot je okvirna konvencija OZN o podnebnih spremembah, pa tudi drugih institucij OZN (FAO, ILO, IMO), prednost pred ozkimi razlagami zakonov o trgovini;
Expresses its regret that WTO members have yet to find a way to integrate this treaty into the system of UN institutions and rules governing environmental protection including climate change, as well as social justice and respect for all human rights; insists that obligations and objectives under MEAs, such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and other UN institutions (FAO, ILO, IMO) must take precedence over the narrow interpretation of trade rules;
6. zlasti poudarja, da je treba uskladiti cilje glede okolja, biotske raznovrstnosti in pogojev za trgovanje, da bi zagotovili na primer učinkovit boj proti krčenju;
Emphasises in particular the need for consistency between climate and biodiversity objectives and conditions of trade to ensure that efforts to tackle deforestation, for example, are effective;
9. upa, da bo EU delovala kot zgled in bo zmanjšala ovire, kot so carine in druge dajatve, za trgovanje z zelenimi tehnologijami ter okolju in podnebju prijaznimi izdelki ter da bo na podlagi akcijskega načrta z Balija in københavnskega zelenega podnebnega sklada spodbujala okoljske dobrine in storitve;
Hopes that the EU will set a good example, by removing obstacles such as tariffs and levies to trade in ‘green’ technologies and environmentally sound and climate-friendly products and promoting ‘environmental goods and services’ (EGS), including on the basis of the Bali Action Plan and the Copenhagen Green Climate Fund;
13. priznava, da pravila WTO ne nasprotujejo mejnim ukrepom za nevtralizacijo učinka domačih politik, ki vključujejo stroške okoljskih dejavnikov v ceno proizvoda, dokler te izravnave niso diskriminacijske;
Recognises that WTO rules are not incompatible with border measures to neutralise the effect of domestic policies incorporating the cost of environmental externalities into the prices of products, as long as such adjustments are not discriminatory;
16. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj naredijo vse, kar je v njihovi moči, da bi v okviru Mednarodne pomorske organizacije dosegle pravno obvezujoč sporazum o zmanjšanju emisij ladij;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to do everything under their power to achieve a legally binding agreement on the reduction of shipping emissions in the context of the International Maritime Organisation;
18. trdi, da bi bilo treba spodbujanje obnovljivih energij okrepiti povsod, kjer si vlade držav članic prizadevajo za dosledno politiko in vzpostavijo zavezujoč pravni okvir, ki dolgoročno omogoča sprejetje stopenjskega programa pomoči, ki prispevajo k odprtju trga in vzpostavitvi minimalne infrastrukture, kar je bistvenega pomena v času krize in poslovne negotovosti;
Advocates stepping up the promotion of renewable energies and that Member State governments follow a consistent policy and establish a binding legal framework enabling the adoption, in the long term, of a phased programme of aid contributing to market opening and to the creation of minimal infrastructures, an element which is essential at a time of crisis and business uncertainty;
o mednarodni trgovinski politiki v okviru zahtev glede podnebnih sprememb
on International Trade Policy in the context of Climate Change imperatives
Pripravljavka mnenja: Catherine Grèze
Rapporteur: Catherine Grèze
2. obžaluje, da precejšni del mednarodne trgovine predstavljajo homogeni izdelki, ki bi se jih lahko proizvajalo na lokalni ravni, in da prevoz, ki je za to potreben, ne krije lastnih okoljskih stroškov;
Regrets that a significant part of international trade consists of homogeneous products which could just as easily be produced locally and that the transport required does not bear its own environmental costs;
4. poudarja, da morajo razvite države prevzeti vodilno vlogo pri zmanjševanju emisij CO2; meni, da so oblikovanje standardov, označevanje in potrjevanje instrumenti z velikim potencialom za zmanjšanje porabe energije in s tem za reševanje vprašanja podnebnih sprememb; poziva države članice, naj okrepijo regulacijo sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami, tako da določijo najnižjo ceno ogljika; meni, da se mehanizem čistega razvoja ni uspel posvetiti potrebam najranljivejših držav;
Stresses that developed countries must take the lead in reducing CO2 emissions; believes that the setting-up of standards, labelling and certification are instruments with a huge potential for reducing energy use and thereby addressing climate change; calls on the Member States to strengthen their regulation over the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) by establishing a minimum price for carbon; deems that the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has failed to address the needs of most vulnerable countries;
7. poziva EU, naj prevzame vodilno vlogo pri opredeljevanju najočitnejših ovir za širjenje tehnologij v državah v razvoju, da se tako rešijo podnebne spremembe;
Calls on the EU to take the lead in the identification of the salient barriers to the dissemination of technologies in developing countries to address climate change;
9. poudarja, da si je treba prizadevati za to, da se bodo škodljivi vplivi na okolje, ki so posledica trgovine, odražali v cenah in da se bo izvajalo načelo „onesnaževalec plača“; poziva k uskladitvi sistemov označevanja in informiranja v zvezi z okoljskimi standardi;
Stresses that efforts must be made to ensure that adverse environmental effects resulting from trade are reflected in prices and that the ‘polluter pays’ principle is enforced; urges that the labelling and information systems regarding environmental standards be synchronised;
o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi ukrepa Evropske unije za znak evropske dediščine
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Union action for the European Heritage Label
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0076 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0076 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 167 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0071/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 167 of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0071/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju obrazloženega mnenja, ki ga je na predsednika Parlamenta naslovil nacionalni parlament glede usklajenosti osnutka akta z načelom subsidiarnosti,
– having regard to the reasoned opinion sent to its President by a national parliament on the compliance of the draft act with the principle of subsidiarity,
UL C 267, 1.10.2010. str.
OJ C 267, 1.10.2010, p.52. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A7-0311/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A7‑0311/2010 ),
(1) Cilj Pogodbe je vse tesnejša zveza med narodi Evrope, člen 167 pa zlasti določa, da mora Evropska unija prispevati k razcvetu kultur držav članic in pri tem upoštevati njihovo nacionalno in regionalno raznolikost ter hkrati poudarjati skupno kulturno dediščino.
(1) The Treaty aims at an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe and Article 167 in particular gives the European Union the task of contributing to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity and at the same time bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore.
(1) Cilj Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je vse tesnejša zveza med narodi Evrope, člen 167 PDEU pa zlasti določa, da mora Evropska unija prispevati k razcvetu kultur držav članic in pri tem upoštevati njihovo nacionalno in regionalno raznolikost ter hkrati poudarjati skupno kulturno dediščino.
(1) The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) aims at an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe and Article 167 TFEU in particular gives the European Union the task of contributing to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity and at the same time bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore.
Poleg tega člen 167(2) PDEU določa, da mora Unija v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti prispevati k izboljšanju poznavanja in razširjanja kulture in zgodovine evropskih narodov.
Furthermore, Article 167(2) TFEU specifies that, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, the Union is to contribute to improvement of the knowledge and dissemination of the culture and history of the European peoples.
(3) Pogodba tudi uvaja državljanstvo Unije, ki dopolnjuje nacionalno državljanstvo držav članic in je pomemben element krepitve in varovanja procesa evropskega povezovanja.
(3) The Treaty also establishes citizenship of the Union, which complements national citizenship of the respective Member States, and which is an important element in safeguarding and strengthening the process of European integration.
Da bi državljani v celoti podprli evropsko povezovanje, je treba bolj poudariti njihove skupne vrednote, zgodovino in kulturo, ki so ključne prvine njihovega članstva v družbi, temelječi na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic, kulturne raznolikosti, strpnosti in solidarnosti.
For citizens to give their full support to European integration, greater emphasis should be placed on their common values, history and culture as key elements of their membership of a society founded on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights, cultural diversity, tolerance and solidarity.
Da bi državljani v celoti podprli evropsko povezovanje, je treba bolj poudariti njihove skupne vrednote, zgodovino in kulturo, ki so ključne prvine njihovega članstva v družbi, temelječi na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic, kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti, strpnosti in solidarnosti.
For citizens to give their full support to European integration, greater emphasis should be placed on their common values, history and culture as key elements of their membership of a society founded on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights, cultural and linguistic diversity, tolerance and solidarity.
(6a) Dosedanje izkušnje, pridobljene z medvladno pobudo, bi morali uporabiti v korist znaka evropske dediščine.
( 6a ) The European Heritage Label should benefit from the experience hitherto gathered from the intergovernmental initiative.
Vse izkušnje, ki so bile doslej pridobljene z medvladno pobudo, je treba koristno uporabiti za nov ukrep EU.
All experience acquired so far in the intergovernmental initiative has to be put in good use for the new EU Action.
(7) Projekt znaka evropske dediščine mora vzpostaviti sinergije in dopolnjevanje z drugimi pobudami , kot sta Unescov seznam svetovne kulturne dediščine in program „evropskih kulturnih poti“ Sveta Evrope.
(7) The European Heritage Label should seek synergies and complementarities with other initiatives such as the UNESCO World Heritage List and the Council of Europe’s ‘European Cultural Routes’.
Dodana vrednost novega znaka evropske dediščine mora temeljiti na prispevku izbranih spomenikov k evropski zgodovini in kulturi, na jasni izobraževalni razsežnosti, usmerjeni k državljanom vključno z mladimi , in na spletnem povezovanju med spomeniki za izmenjavo izkušenj in najboljših praks.
The added value of the new European Heritage Label should be based on the contribution made by the selected sites to European history and culture, on a clear educational dimension reaching out to citizens, including young people, and on networking between the sites to share experiences and best practices.
Glavni poudarek pobude mora biti promocija spomenikov in dostop do njih ter kakovost predloženih obrazložitev in predlaganih dejavnosti, namesto ohranjanja spomenikov, ki bi ga morale zagotavljati že obstoječe varstvene ureditve.
The main focus of the initiative should be on the promotion and the access of the sites, and on the quality of the explanations given and of the activities proposed, rather than on the conservation of the sites, which should be guaranteed by existing protection regimes.
(7) Projekt znaka evropske dediščine bi moral dopolnjevati, toda ne podvajati pobud , kot so Unescov seznam svetovne kulturne dediščine, Unescov reprezentativni seznam nesnovne kulturne dediščine človeštva in program „evropskih kulturnih poti“ Sveta Evrope.
(7) The European Heritage Label should seek to supplement but not duplicate initiatives such as the UNESCO World Heritage List , the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, and the Council of Europe’s ‘European Cultural Routes’.