natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(b) za podjetja: trgovsko ime, ime, ki ga podjetje uporablja pri svoji dejavnosti, sedež podjetja in/ali identifikacijska številka DDV ter tudi identifikacijska številka za trošarine, kot je določeno v členu 22(2a) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2073/2004 z dne 16. novembra 2004 o upravnem sodelovanju na področju trošarin 1 in v členu 15a(2a) Direktive Sveta 92/12/EGS z dne 25. februarja 1992 o splošnem režimu za trošarinske proizvode in o skladiščenju, gibanju in nadzoru takih proizvodov 2 , kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 92/108/EGS 3 .
(b) for companies: the business name, the name used by the company in its activity and/or the VAT identifier and the excise duty identification number as provided for in Article 22(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2073/2004 of 16 November 2004 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties 1 and Article 15a(2)(a) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products 2 , as last amended by Directive 92/108/EEC 3 .
Člen 1, točka 19 Člen 42 a, odstavek 1 (Uredba (ES) št. 515/97)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 19 Article 42 a, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No 515/97)
Ta uredba je pravna podlaga za kritje vseh dejavnosti Skupnosti, ki jih določa ta uredba, zlasti naslednjih :
This Regulation is the basic act on which the financing of all Community action provided for herein is based , including :
Ko se stalna tehnična infrastruktura iz točke (a) uporablja pri carinskem sodelovanju iz naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, krijejo prevozne in nastanitvene stroške ter dnevnice svojih predstavnikov države članice .
Where the permanent technical infrastructure referred to at (a) is used for the purposes of the customs cooperation provided for by Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, the transport, accommodation costs and the daily allowances of the representatives of the Member States shall be borne by the Member States;
Ko se stalna tehnična infrastruktura iz točke (a) uporablja pri carinskem sodelovanju iz naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, krijejo prevozne in nastanitvene stroške ter dnevnice svojih predstavnikov države članice ;
Where the permanent technical infrastructure referred to at (a) is used for the purposes of the customs cooperation provided for by Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, the transport, accommodation costs and the daily allowances of the representatives of the Member States shall be borne by the Member States;
c) odhodki, povezani s pridobitvijo, študijami, razvijanjem in vzdrževanjem informacijske infrastrukture (strojne opreme), programske opreme in mrežnih povezav , kot tudi s službami za oskrbo, podporo in usposabljanje za namene izvajanja dejavnosti, ki so predvidene v tej uredbi, zlasti preprečevanja goljufij in boja proti njim;
(c) expenditure related to the acquisition, study, development and maintenance of the computer infrastructure (hardware) and the software and dedicated network connections and related production, support and training services for carrying out the actions provided for in this Regulation, in particular for preventing and combating fraud;
(d) odhodki, povezani z zagotavljanjem informacij, in stroški, povezani z zadevnimi ukrepi, ki omogočajo dostop do informacij, podatkov in virov podatkov v okviru boja proti goljufijam na področju zaščite finančnih interesov in drugih interesov Skupnosti;
(d) expenditure related to the provision of information and expenditure on related actions allowing access to information, data and data sources for the purposes of fraud prevention in the field of the protection of the Community’s financial or other interests.
d) odhodki, povezani z zagotavljanjem informacij, in stroški, povezani z zadevnimi ukrepi, ki omogočajo dostop do informacij, podatkov in virov podatkov v okviru izvajanja dejavnosti, ki so predvidene v tej uredbi, zlasti preprečevanja goljufij in boja proti njim ;
(d) expenditure related to the provision of information and expenditure on related actions allowing access to information, data and data sources for the purposes of carrying out the actions provided for in this Regulation, in particular for preventing and combating fraud;
e) odhodki, povezani z uporabo informacijskega sistema za carine, v skladu z instrumenti, sprejetimi na podlagi naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, in zlasti s Sporazumom o uporabi informacijske tehnologije v carinske namene, sprejetim na podlagi Akta Sveta z dne 26. julija 1995 , če ti instrumenti ne določajo izrecno, da navedene odhodke krije proračun Skupnosti.
(e) expenditure related to use of the Customs Information System provided by the instruments adopted under Title VI of the Treaty on European Union and in particular the Convention on the use of information technology in customs matters established by Council Act of 26 July 1995 1 , insofar as these instruments provide that this expenditure shall be borne by the Community budget.
Člen 1, točka 19 Člen 42 a, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 515/97)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 19 Article 42 a, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 515/97)
Člen 1, točka 20, točka -a (novo) Člen 43, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 515/97
ARTICLE 1, POINT 20, point -a (new) Article 43, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 515/97
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporabljata člen 5a od (1) do (4) ter člen 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES, ob upoštevanju določb njegovega člena 8.“
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a (1) to (4), and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof."
Predlog spremembe komitologije, potreben za uvedbo novega regulativnega postopka s pregledom v skladu z določbami Sklepa Sveta 2006/512/ES.
Comitology amendment needed to introduce the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny, in line with the provisions of Council Decision 2006/512/EC.
Člen 1, točka 20, točka -aa (novo) Člen 43, odstavek 3 (Uredba (ES) št. 515/97)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 20, point -aa (new) Article 43, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC) No 515/97)
(-aa) Odstavek 3 se črta.
(-aa) Paragraph 3 is deleted.
Člen 1, točka 21 a (novo) Člen 51 a (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 515/97)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 21 A (new) Article 51 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 515/97)
(21a) Vstavi se naslednji člen 51a:
(21a) The following Article 51a is inserted:
„Člen 51a
"Article 51a
Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami letno poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o ukrepih, sprejetih za izvajanje te uredbe.“
The Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall each year submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the measures taken for the implementation of this Regulation."
Medsebojna pomoč med upravnimi organi držav članic in sodelovanje med njimi in Komisijo pri izvajanju carinske in kmetijske zakonodaje
Mutual assistance and cooperation between the administrative authorities of the Member States and the Commission concerning the application of the law on customs and agricultural matters
Medsebojna pomoči med upravnimi organi držav članic in o sodelovanju med njimi in Komisijo zaradi zagotavljanja pravilnega izvajanja carinske in kmetijske zakonodaje
Mutual assistance and cooperation between the administrative authorities of the Member States and the Commission concerning the application of the law on customs and agricultural matters
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi postopkov za uporabo nekaterih nacionalnih tehničnih predpisov pri izdelkih, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici, in o razveljavitvi Odločbe 3052/95/ES
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down procedures relating to the application of certain national technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member State and repealing Decision 3052/95/EC
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................48
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............50
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................57
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................60
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0036 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0036 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) ter členov 37 in 95 Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0065/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 37 and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0065/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov in mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0489/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0489/2007 ),
(1) Notranji trg zajema območje brez notranjih meja, v katerem je v skladu s Pogodbo zagotovljen prost pretok blaga in so prepovedani ukrepi, ki bi imeli enak učinek kot količinske omejitve uvoza.
(1) The internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods is ensured under the Treaty, which prohibits measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports.
(1) Notranji trg zajema območje brez notranjih meja, kjer mora biti konkurenca svobodna in neizkrivljena in v katerem je v skladu s Pogodbo zagotovljen prost pretok blaga in so prepovedani ukrepi, ki bi imeli enak učinek kot količinske omejitve uvoza.
(1) The internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers , where competition should be free and undistorted, in which the free movement of goods is ensured under the Treaty, which prohibits measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports.
Da bi notranji trg deloval brezhibno in v korist evropskih državljanov, je treba zagotoviti svobodno in neizkrivljeno konkurenco.
A fully functioning internal market requires conditions of free and undistorted competition, for the benefit of EU citizens.
(2) Če zakonodaja ni usklajena, lahko nacionalni organi nezakonito ustvarijo ovire za prost pretok blaga med državami članicami, ko za izdelke iz drugih držav članic, kjer se izdelki zakonito tržijo, uporabijo tehnični predpis, s katerim določijo zahteve, ki jih morajo taki izdelki izpolnjevati, na primer zahteve glede poimenovanja, oblike, velikosti, teže, sestave, predstavitve, označevanja in embalaže.
(2) Obstacles to the free movement of goods between Member States may be unlawfully created by the national authorities, in the absence of harmonisation of legislation, as a consequence of applying, to goods coming from other Member States where they are lawfully marketed, technical rules laying down requirements to be met by such goods , such as those relating to designation, form, size, weight, composition, presentation, labelling and packaging.
Uporaba takih tehničnih predpisov pri izdelkih, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici, je lahko nezdružljiva s členom 28 in 30 Pogodbe ES, četudi se taki nacionalni predpisi brez razlike uporabljajo pri vseh izdelkih.
The application of such technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member States can be contrary to Articles 28 and 30 of the EC Treaty, even if those national rules apply without distinction to all products.
(2) Če zakonodaja ni usklajena, lahko pristojni organi nezakonito ustvarijo ovire za prost pretok blaga med državami članicami, ko za izdelke iz drugih držav članic, kjer se izdelki zakonito tržijo, uporabijo tehnični predpis, s katerim določijo zahteve, ki jih morajo taki izdelki izpolnjevati, na primer zahteve glede poimenovanja, oblike, velikosti, teže, sestave, predstavitve, označevanja , embalaže in podobno .
(2) Obstacles to the free movement of goods between Member States may be unlawfully created by the competent authorities, in the absence of harmonisation of legislation, as a consequence of applying, to products coming from other Member States where they are lawfully marketed, technical rules laying down requirements to be met by such products , such as those relating to designation, form, size, weight, composition, presentation, labelling , packaging and so on .
Uporaba takih tehničnih predpisov pri izdelkih, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici, je lahko nezdružljiva s členom 28 in 30 Pogodbe ES, četudi se taki tehnični predpisi brez razlike uporabljajo pri vseh izdelkih.
The application of such technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member States can be contrary to Articles 28 and 30 of the EC Treaty, even if those technical rules apply without distinction to all products.
Namen teh sprememb, ki jih je treba vnesti v celotnem besedilu, je upoštevanje različnih upravnih sistemov in razdelitve funkcij v posameznih državah članicah.
These changes, which should apply throughout the text, seek to take account of the different administrative systems and allocation of functions within each Member State.
Zato je treba izraz „nacionalni organi“ nadomestiti s „pristojni organi“ (npr. v uvodnih izjavah 4, 12) ter „nacionalni tehnični predpisi“ s „tehnični predpisi“ (npr. v uvodni izjavi 7), saj je mogoče te tehnične spremembe sprejeti ne le na nacionalni, temveč tudi na regionalni ravni.
Hence, the words "national authorities" should be replaced by "competent authorities"(e.g. in recitals 4, 12) and "national technical rules" should be replaced by "technical rules" (e.g. in recital 7), given that technical rules can also be adopted not only at national but also at regional level.
Izraz „blago“ pa je treba nadomestiti z izrazom „izdelki“, ker se ta uredba sklicuje na izdelke (ne velja za slovensko različico, op. p.).
The term "products" has been chosen in preference to "goods", because this Regulation refers to products.
(2a) Vzajemno priznavanje, ki izhaja iz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, je eno od sredstev za zagotavljanje prostega pretoka blaga v EU.
(2a) Mutual recognition, which derives from the case-law of the Court of Justice, is one of the means of ensuring the free movement of goods within the EU.
Uporablja se za izdelke, za katere ne velja usklajevalna zakonodaja Skupnosti, ali za vidike izdelkov, ki ne sodijo na področje uporabe usklajevalne zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Mutual recognition applies to products which are not subject to Community harmonisation legislation, or to aspects of products falling outside the scope of Community harmonisation legislation.
To pomeni, da država članica na svojem ozemlju ne more prepovedati prodaje izdelkov, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici, četudi so bili proizvedeni v skladu s tehničnimi predpisi, ki se razlikujejo od predpisov, veljavnih za domače proizvode.
It means that a Member State cannot forbid the sale on its territory of products which are lawfully marketed in another Member State , even if those products were manufactured according to technical rules different to those which must be met by domestic products.
Edina izjema pri tem načelu so omejitve, utemeljene z razlogi iz člena 30 Pogodbe o ES ali z višjimi razlogi javnega interesa, sorazmerne z zadanim ciljem.
The only exceptions to this principle are restrictions which are justified on the grounds described in Article 30 of the Treaty or on the basis of overriding reasons of public interest, and are proportionate to the aim pursued.
S to uredbo naj bi izboljšali uporabo načela vzajemnega priznavanja.
This Regulation aims at improving the application of the principle of mutual recognition.
Zato je potrebna uvodna izjava, v kateri bo obrazloženo to načelo, izhajajoče iz sodne prakse Sodišča.
Consequently, a recital is needed to explain this principle, which derives from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice.
(3) Z vzpostavitvijo ustreznih postopkov je treba čim bolj zmanjšati možnost, da bi nacionalni tehnični predpisi ustvarjali nezakonite ovire za prost pretok blaga med državami članicami.
(3) It is necessary to establish procedures to minimise the possibility that such national technical rules create unlawful obstacles to the free movement of goods between Member States.
Ker v državah članicah takšni postopki niso vzpostavljeni, je to dodatna ovira za prost pretok blaga, saj podjetja odvrača od prodaje svojih izdelkov, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici, na ozemlju države članice, ki določi tehnične predpise.
The absence of such procedures in Member States causes additional obstacles to the free movement of goods, since it discourages enterprises from selling their products, lawfully marketed in another Member State, on the territory of the Member State laying down technical rules.
Ankete so pokazale, da številna podjetja, zlasti mala in srednja podjetja (MSP), svoje izdelke bodisi prilagodijo zahtevam tehničnih predpisov namembne države članice bodisi v taki državi opustijo trženje.
Surveys have shown that many enterprises, and in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), either adapt their products in order to comply with the technical rules of the Member State of destination, or refrain from marketing them there.
(3) Obstaja še veliko težav v zvezi s pravilno uporabo načela vzajemnega priznavanja v državah članicah.
(3) Many problems still exist as regards the correct application of the principle of mutual recognition by the Member States .
Uporaba tehničnih predpisov za izdelke, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici, je denimo najpogostejša in najdražja trgovinska omejitev, saj je v skoraj 50 % primerov razlog za ovire, s katerim se podjetja srečujejo na notranjem trgu.
Thus, the application of technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member State is the most common and costly trade barrier, accounting for almost 50% of the total barriers encountered by undertakings in the internal market.
Z vzpostavitvijo ustreznih postopkov je treba zato čim bolj zmanjšati možnost, da bi tehnični predpisi ustvarjali nezakonite ovire za prost pretok blaga med državami članicami.
It is therefore necessary to establish procedures to minimise the possibility that such technical rules create unlawful obstacles to the free movement of goods between Member States.
Naj opomnimo, notranji trg za blago še ni povsem dokončan, saj se podjetja, zlasti mala in srednja, pri čezmejni trgovini še vedno soočajo z omejitvami.
To recall that the Internal Market for goods is not yet fully complete since companies, in particular SMEs, still encounter barriers when trading across borders.
Zato je treba s to uredbo odpraviti najpogostejše in najdražje trgovinske omejitve na notranjem trgu, tj. uporabo tehničnih predpisov za izdelke, ki se zakonito tržijo v drugi državi članici.
Hence, the need for this Regulation, which concerns the most common and costly trade barrier in the Internal Market, i.e. the application of technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member State.
(6) Evropski svet, ki se je sestal 15. in 16. junija 2006, je poudaril pomen preprostega, preglednega in nezapletenega regulativnega okolja ter krepitve zaupanja potrošnikov in podjetij v notranji trg.
(6) The European Council of 15 and 16 June 2006 emphasised the importance of a simple, transparent and easy-to-apply regulatory environment and of strengthening consumer and business confidence in the internal market.
Na Evropskem svetu 21. in 22. junija 2007 je bilo poudarjeno, da je treba za zagotovitev rasti, konkurence in zaposlenosti še naprej krepiti štiri svoboščine notranjega trga (prost pretok blaga, oseb, storitev in kapitala) ter izboljševati njegovo delovanje.
The European Council of 21 and 22 June 2007 underlined that the further strengthening of the four freedoms of the internal market (free movement of goods, persons, services and capital) and improving its functioning remain of paramount importance for growth, competitiveness and employment.
Evropski svet je Svet in Evropski parlament pozval k hitremu sprejemu te uredbe brez poseganja v usklajevanje nacionalnih tehničnih predpisov, kjer je to potrebno.
The European Council called on the Council and the European Parliament to make rapid progress in adopting this Regulation, without prejudice to the harmonisation of national technical rules where appropriate.
Upoštevanje izjave z zadnjega srečanja Evropskega sveta v zvezi s tem predlogom.
To take account of the statement at the last European Council regarding this proposal
(8) Glede na načeli sorazmernosti in subsidiarnosti ni primerno , da bi uskladili vse nacionalne tehnične predpise za večino ali vse kategorije izdelkov .
(8) It is not appropriate , in the light of the principle of proportionality and subsidiarity, to harmonise all national technical rules for most or all product categories.
(8) Ta uredba ne sme posegati v nadaljnje usklajevanje tehničnih predpisov, kjer je to primerno , s čimer naj bi izboljšali delovanje notranjega trga.
(8) This Regulation should not prejudice, where appropriate , the adoption of further harmonisation of technical rules , with a view to improving the functioning of the internal market.
Ti ukrepi, ki lahko ovirajo prost pretok blaga, niso tehnični predpis v smislu te uredbe in zato ne sodijo na področje njene uporabe.
However, these measures, which may hinder the free movement of goods, do not constitute a technical rule within the meaning of this Regulation and do not therefore fall within its scope.
V pojasnilo je treba navesti nekatere vrste ukrepov, ki očitno niso tehnični predpisi.
For the purpose of clarification some types of measures that clearly fall outside the definition of technical rule need to be mentioned.
(8b) Tehnični predpisi v smislu te uredbe se včasih upoštevajo v postopkih obvezne predhodne odobritve, ki jih predvideva zakonodaja držav članic, po kateri je mogoče izdelek ali vrsto izdelka dati na trg države članice ali njegov del šele, kot to uradno odobri pristojni organ te države članice na podlagi vloge prosilca.
(8b) Technical rules within the meaning of this Regulation are sometimes applied during and by means of obligatory prior authorisation procedures, established by law of the Member States and under which, before the product or type of product may be put on the market of a Member State or a part thereof, the competent authority of that Member State should give its formal approval following an application submitted by the applicant.
(8c) Če postopek obvezne predhodne odobritve, ki ga je uvedla država članica, ni v nasprotju z zakonodajo Skupnosti, je treba pristojnim organom omogočiti, da v skladu z zakonodajo države članice v primerih, ko nosilec gospodarske dejavnosti ne zaprosi za predhodno odobritev države članice, nemudoma umaknejo izdelek s trga oziroma ne dovolijo njegovega trženja, dokler postopek predhodne odobritve ni dokončan.
(8c) Where an obligatory prior authorisation procedure established by a Member State is compatible with Community law, competent authorities should be permitted, under law of the Member State and where the economic operator fails to apply for such prior authorisation of the Member State , to remove a product immediately from the market or to refuse to allow it to be placed on the market until the prior authorisation procedure has been completed.
Obvezni umiki izdelkov s trga, ki so izključno posledica dejstva, da nosilec gospodarske dejavnosti za svoj izdelek ni sprožil postopka obvezne predhodne odobritve, če to zahteva zakonodaja države članice, niso sklepi za namene te uredbe.
Compulsory withdrawals of products that exclusively relate to the failure of an economic operator to submit his product to an obligatory prior authorisation procedure established by law of a Member State should not constitute a decision for the purposes of this Regulation.