natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To je več kot dvakrat več od števila primerov, ki so bili na ta način rešeni leta 2006, in kaže na vedno večjo pripravljenost institucij ali organov, da pritožbe varuhu vidijo kot priložnost za popravljanje storjenih napak in da sodelujejo z varuhom v korist evropskih državljanov.
This is more than twice the number of cases settled in this way in 2006, and it reflects a growing willingness from the institutions and bodies to regards complaints made to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to correct mistakes and to cooperate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of European citizens.
Po pritožbi nemške univerze zaradi spora s Komisijo glede plačila projekta v programu Erasmus je varuh navezal stik s Komisijo, ki je zadevo rešila v dveh tednih s plačilom zahtevanega zneska in obresti.
After a German university complained about a payment dispute with the Commission regarding a project under the Erasmus Programme, the Ombudsman contacted the Commission, which settled the matter within 2 weeks by repaying the requested sum plus interest.
Ko varuh ugotovi nepravilnost, skuša poiskati sporazumno rešitev.
When the Ombudsman finds maladministration, he tries to achieve a friendly solution.
V nekaterih primerih se lahko doseže, če institucija ali organ pritožniku ponudi odškodnino.
In some cases, a friendly solution can be achieved if the institution or body concerned offers compensation to the complainant.
Takšne ponudbe so podane ex gratia , torej brez prevzemanja pravne odgovornost in ustvarjanja pravnih precedensov.
Any such offer is made ex gratia , i.e. without admission of legal liability and without creating a legal precedent.
Sporazumne rešitve so bile v letu 2007 med drugim dosežene z Evropsko agencijo za varnost v letalstvu, ki je spremenila sporni sklep o tipskem certifikatu za neko letalo, in Evropskim centrom za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije, ki je pristal, da neuspešnemu prijavniku na javni razpis posreduje boljše podatke o primerjavi njegove vloge s tisto, ki je bila izbrana.
Friendly solutions achieved in 2007 included the European Aviation Safety Agency, which replaced a contested decision relating to the type-certification basis of certain aircraft, and the former European Monitoring Centre for Racism and Xenophobia, which agreed to provide better information to an unsuccessful tender about how his bid compared with that of the winner.
Po preiskavi je eden od pritožnikov izrazil hvaležnost za izid in povedal, da je preiskava zagotovila zanesljivo varovalo za preglednost v Evropski uniji,
Following the inquiry, one of the complainants expressed his gratitude for the outcome and stated that the inquiry had helped provide a reliable safeguard for transparency in the EU.
Ko sporazumna rešitev ni mogoča, varuh primer zaključi s kritično oceno ali pa pripravi osnutek priporočila.
When a friendly solution is not possible the Ombudsman closes the case with a critical remark, or makes a draft recommendation.
Kritična ocena pritožniku potrdi, da je njegova pritožba upravičena, zadevni instituciji ali organu pa nakaže, kje je storil napako, kar pripomore k preprečevanju nepravilnosti v prihodnje.
A critical remark confirms to the complainant that his or her complaint is justified and indicates to the institution or body concerned what it has done wrong, so as to help it avoid maladministration in the future.
Leta 2007 je varuh s kritično oceno zaključil 55 preiskav.
In 2007, the Ombudsman closed 55 inquiries with critical remarks.
Kritično je presodil Komisijo, ker leta 2006, kot je pravno zavezana, ni objavila letnega poročila za leto 2005 o dostopu do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije.
He criticised e.g. the Commission for its failure to publish in 2006, as required by law, its annual report 2005 on access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
V zvezi s tem se je pritožila nevladna organizacija Statewatch.
This followed a complaint from the NGO Statewatch.
Čeprav je varuh ugotovil, da je Komisija septembra 2007 to poročilo končno objavila, je poudaril, da je pravočasna objava poročil ključni mehanizem odgovornosti do evropskih državljanov.
While recognizing that the Commission finally in September 2007 published the report in question, the Ombudsman pointed out that the timely publication of reports is a key mechanism of accountability to European citizens.
Varuh je podal tudi kritični oceni za EPSO v primerih glede uporabe jezikov "novih" držav članic v nasprotju s "starimi".
The Ombudsman also issued two critical remarks against EPSO in two cases concerning the use of languages of the "new" Member States as opposed to those of the "old" Member States.
To je bila posledica pritožbe poljskega združenja v zvezi s preizkusi znanja pri zaposlovanju.
This followed a complaint from a Polish association concerning recruitment tests.
EPSO je odgovoril, da so bile jezikovne zahteve za natečaje medtem že spremenjene.
EPSO replied that the language requirements for competitions had been changed in the meantime.
Pomembno je, da institucije in organi ukrepajo na podlagi kritične ocene varuha in pričnejo reševati težave, da bi se v prihodnje izognili nepravilnostim.
It is important for the institutions and bodies to follow up on critical remarks from the Ombudsman, taking action to resolve outstanding problems and thus to avoid maladministration in the future.
Varuhove službe so tudi izvedle študijo o nadaljnjih postopkih v zvezi s kritičnimi ocenami, podanimi leta 2006, njene ugotovitve pa si bile 22. maja 2008 posredovane vsem zadevnim institucijam.
The Ombudsman's services have also completed a study of the follow-up to all critical remarks made in 2006 and the results was sent to all the institutions involved on 22 May 2008.
Če je mogoče, da zadevna institucija odpravi nepravilnosti, ali kadar so te izjemno hude ali imajo splošne posledice, varuh običajno pripravi osnutek priporočila za zadevno institucijo ali organ, ki se mora v treh mesecih odzvati s podrobnim mnenjem.
In cases where it is possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the instance of maladministration, or in cases where the maladministration is particularly serious, or has general implications, the Ombudsman normally makes a draft recommendation to the institution or body concerned, which must respond with a detailed opinion within three months.
Leta 2007 je bilo podanih osem osnutkov priporočil.
During 2007, eight draft recommendations were made.
Če se institucija ali organ Skupnosti na osnutek priporočila ne odzove zadovoljivo, lahko varuh Evropskemu parlamentu pošlje posebno poročilo.
If a Community institution or body fails to respond satisfactorily to a draft recommendation, the Ombudsman may send a special report to the European Parliament.
To je njegovo orožje v skrajni sili in zadnji bistveni korak, ki ga lahko stori pri obravnavi primera, saj je sprejetje resolucije in izvajanje parlamentarnih pooblastil stvar presoje Parlamenta.
This constitutes the Ombudsman's ultimate weapon and is the last substantive step he may take in dealing with a case, since the adoption of a resolution and the exercise of Parliament's powers are matters for the political judgment of the Parliament.
Leta 2007 je varuh Parlamentu predložil eno posebno poročilo, v katerem je kritično presodil Komisijo, ker ni obravnavala pritožbe v zvezi z evropsko direktivo o delovnem času, o kateri je odbor za peticije, katerega poročevalec je bil Proinsias De Rossa, pripravil poročilo
In 2007, the Ombudsman submitted one special report to Parliament, criticising the Commission for not dealing with a complaint concerning the European Working Time Directive, to which the Committee on Petitions, with Proinsias De Rossa as rapporteur, has drafted a report
Osnutek poročila PE 402.876. .
Draft report PE 402.876 .
Preiskave na lastno pobudo lahko varuh sproži v dveh glavnih primerih.
The Ombudsman makes use of his power to launch own-initiative inquiries in two main instances.
Prvič, preiskuje lahko domnevne primere nepravilnosti, če je pritožbo vložila nepooblaščena oseba (t. j. če pritožnik ni državljan Unije oziroma v njej nima stalnega prebivališča ali pa ni pravna oseba s sedežem v državi članici).
Firstly, he may use it to investigate a possible case of maladministration when a complaint has been submitted by a non-authorised person (i.e., when the complainant is not a citizen or resident of the Union or a legal person with a registered office in a Member State).
Leta 2007 sta bili sproženi dve preiskavi na lastno pobudo.
Two such own-initiative inquiries were opened in 2007.
Pooblastilo za preiskave na lastno pobudo lahko uporabi tudi za reševanje na videz sistematičnih težav v institucijah.
He may also use his own-initiative power to tackle what appears to be a systemic problem in the institutions.
Decembra 2007 je varuh na primer na lastno pobudo sprožil preiskavo o pravočasnosti plačil Komisije.
For example the Ombudsman launched in December 2007 an own-initiative inquiry into the subject of the timeliness of payments made by the Commission.
Komisijo je pozval, naj posreduje podatke o tem, kaj je bilo storjeno za preprečitev zamujenih plačil, ter za statistične podatke o primerih zamujenih plačil in podatke o politiki Komisije glede plačila obresti.
He asked the Commission to provide information on what has been done to avoid late payment, statistical data on late payment cases, as well as information about the Commission's policy on paying interest.
To je sledilo pritožbam posameznikov, podjetij in organizacij, ki so sodelovale v projektih in pogodbah, ki jih je financirala Evropska unija.
This follows complaints from individuals, companies and organisations involved in EU-funded projects and contracts.
Med drugimi preiskavami na lastno pobudo iz leta 2007 sta tudi preiskava o EPSO-vem računalniško podprtem preizkusu znanja in preiskava upravljanja s človeškimi viri v skupnem raziskovalnem centru Komisije.
Among the other own-initiative inquiries opened in 2007 were one into EPSO's computer-based testing, and one concerning the management of human resources at the Commission's Joint Research Centre.
Leta 2007 je varuh zaključil preiskavo na lastno pobudo o ukrepih, ki jih je Komisija sprejela proti diskriminaciji invalidov v njihovih odnosih z institucijami.
In 2007, the Ombudsman concluded an own-initiative inquiry into the measures adopted by the Commission to ensure that people with disabilities are not discriminated against in their relations with the institution.
Med predlaganimi pozitivnimi ukrepi so tudi tisti, ki zagotavljajo preprostejši dostop do podatkov preko spletne strani Komisije ter izboljšanje pogojev zaposlovanja in napredovanja.
Among the positive measures he identified were those designed to provide easier access to information via the Commission's website and to improve recruitment and promotion conditions.
Poudaril pa je, da bi bilo treba storiti več, da bi osebje Komisije ozavestili o potrebah invalidov.
He underlined, however, that more should be done to sensitise the Commission's staff to the needs of people with disabilities.
Na koncu je kritično ocenil neprimerne razmere za invalidne učence v evropskih šolah.
Finally, he also criticised as inadequate the situation in the European Schools concerning for pupils with disabilities.
Varuh je svoje tokratno letno poročilo spet zaključil s predstavitvijo "izjemnih primerov" dobrega upravljanja s strani institucij in organov, ki jih je odkril v svojih preiskavah, da bi poudaril, da urad evropskega varuha človekovih pravic obstaja tudi zato, da nudi pomoč in spodbuja dobro upravljanje, zlasti kadar je to lahko splošni zgled za institucije in organe Evropske unije.
The Ombudsman has this year again included in the Annual Report the notion of "star cases" in order to highlight instances of good administrative practice by institutions and bodies revealed through his inquiries and to emphasise that the Ombudsman institution is there also to support and encourage good administrative practice, especially when that can serve as a general model for the EU institutions and bodies.
V letnem poročilu je izpostavljeno sedem takšnih "izjemnih primerov".
Seven such "star cases" are highlighted in the Annual Report.
Štiri se nanašajo na Komisijo, eden na Svet, eden na Evropsko centralno banko in zadnji na Evropsko agencijo za varnost v letalstvu.
Four of these concerned the Commission, one concerned the Council, one the European Central Bank and one the European Aviation Safety Agency.
Prednostne naloge evropskega varuha človekovih pravic
Priorities of the European Ombudsman
Glavna prednostna naloga evropskega varuha človekovih pravic je zagotoviti, da se spoštujejo pravice državljanov iz prava Evropske unije na vsaki ravni v Uniji in da institucije in organi Evropske unije delujejo po najvišjih upravnih standardih.
The main priorities of the European Ombudsman is to ensure that citizens' rights under EU law are respected at every level in the Union and that EU institutions and bodies conform to the highest standards of administration.
Varuh si je še naprej prizadeval za izboljšanje kakovosti podatkov, ki so na voljo državljanom in morebitnim pritožnikom v zvezi z njihovimi pravicami iz prava Evropske unije, zlasti preko evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic.
The Ombudsman has continued his efforts to improve the quality of information provided to citizens and potential complainants concerning their rights under EU law especially through the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Mreža, del katerega je tudi odbor za peticije, sestavlja približno 90 uradov v 31 državah članicah, sodelovanje pri obravnavi primerov poteka vsakodnevno, nenehno teče tudi izmenjava izkušenj in najboljše prakse preko seminarjev in srečanj, s pomočjo rednega biltena in elektronskega foruma za razprave ter dnevnega objavljanja novic.
The Network, which includes the Committee on Petitions, consists of roughly 90 offices in 31 countries and co-operates on a daily basis in case handling, and on a continuing basis in sharing experiences and best practice through seminars and meetings, a regular newsletter, an electronic discussion forum and an electronic daily news service.
Mreža med drugim služi olajšanju hitrega prenosa pritožb pristojnemu varuhu ali podobnemu organu.
One of the purposes of the Network is to facilitate the rapid transfer of complaints to the competent ombudsman or similar body.
Kadar je to mogoče, varuh primere prenese neposredno ali pritožniku da ustrezen nasvet.
When possible, the Ombudsman transfers cases directly or give suitable advice to the complainant.
V letu 2007 je 816 pritožnikom svetoval, naj se obrnejo na nacionalnega ali regionalnega varuha človekovih pravic, zgolj 51 pritožb pa je neposredno posredoval pristojnemu varuhu.
During 2007, he advised 816 complainants to turn to a national or regional ombudsman and transferred only 51 complaints directly to the competent ombudsman.
Varuh si prizadeva, da bi bile institucije in organi Evropske unije pri svojem delovanju osredotočene na državljane, tako da pritožnikom skuša dati vse možnosti za dosego sporazumne rešitve in da sproža več preiskav na lastno pobudo, da bi prepoznal težavo in spodbujal najboljšo prakso.
The Ombudsman strive to make certain that the EU institutions and bodies adopt a citizen-centred approach in all their activities, by seeking every opportunity to achieve friendly solutions to complaints and by launching more inquiries on my own-initiative in order to identify problems and encourage best practice.
V ta namen še naprej razvija stike s poslanci in uradniki institucij ter organov Evropske unije, da bi spodbujal kulturo storitev v upravi Evropske unije.
To promote this goal he continues to develop contacts with the Members and officials in the EU institutions and bodies with a view to promoting the culture of service within the EU administration.
Leta 2007 je bilo več kot 60 takšnih srečanj.
Over 60 such meetings took place during 2007.
Zaradi pomembnosti zagotavljanja, da so tisti, ki imajo morebiti težave z upravo Evropske unije, seznanjeni s svojo pravico do pritožbe in z varuhovimi službami, so sam in njegovo osebje v letu 2007 pripravili več kot 130 predstavitev, konferenc, seminarjev in srečanj.
In the light of the importance of ensuring that those who might have problems with the EU administration know about their right to complain and the Ombudsman's services more than 130 presentations were made by the Ombudsman and his staff at conferences, seminars, and meetings during 2007.
Varuh je za ugotavljanje dejstev obiskal tudi Nemčijo, Švedsko in Belgijo, da bi v teh državah širil osveščenost o vlogi varuha.
The Ombudsman also made information visits to Germany, Sweden, and Belgium with a view to promote awareness of the Ombudsman's role in these countries.
Izvedel je tudi šest tiskovnih konferenc, dal več kot 40 intervjujev, objavljeno pa je bilo 17 sporočil za javnost, ki so bila posredovana novinarjem in zainteresiranim stranem po vsej Evropi.
He also gave six press conferences and over 40 interviews and 17 press releases were issued and distributed to journalists and interested parties throughout Europe.
Med publikacijami, pripravljenimi in razširjenimi leta 2007, je novi informacijski letak za podjetja in organizacije, na katerem je zgoščeno predstavljeno, kaj lahko varuh stori zanje.
Amongst the publications produced and distributed in 2007 was a new information sheet for businesses and organisations, which explains succinctly what the Ombudsman can do for these entities.
Poseben interes za ta letak so pokazali gospodarske zbornice in strokovna združenja.
Chambers of commerce and bar associations have been particularly interested in receiving this sheet.
Varuhova spletna stran je bila v letu 2007 redno posodobljena s sklepi, sporočili za javnost in podrobnostmi o komunikacijskih dejavnostih.
The Ombudsman's website has been regularly updated during 2007 with decisions, press releases, and details of communications activities.
Oblikovana je bila nova podstran, da bi se bolj izpostavilo preiskave na lastno pobudo.
A new section of the website was created in order to give a higher profile to own-initiative inquiries.
Od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2007 je imela spletna stran 449.418 posameznih obiskovalcev.
From 1 January to 31 December 2007, the website received 449 418 unique visitors.
Preko povezav se s spletne strani pride tudi na strani nacionalnih in regionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic po vsej Evropi.
The links section of the website includes links to the sites of national and regional ombudsmen throughout Europe.
V letu 2007 je bilo na teh povezanih straneh več kot 82.000 obiskovalcev, kar jasno kaže dodano vrednost storitev za državljane preko evropskega omrežja varuhov človekovih pravic.
Over 82 000 visits were made to the links pages during 2007, clearly demonstrating the added value for citizens of the services provided through the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Trenutno varuhov urad razvija novo spletno stran, na kateri bo tudi interaktivni vodič za pomoč državljanom pri iskanju najprimernejšega načina za naslovitev njihovih težav.
At the moment the Ombudsman's office is developing a new website, which will include an interactive guide to help citizens find the most appropriate avenue of redress for their grievances.
S pomočjo vodiča naj bi še večji delež pritožnikov svoje pritožbe naslovilo neposredno na organ, ki je najprimernejši za njihovo reševanje, kar bo pomenilo tudi, da bo varuh prejel manj nedopustnih pritožb.
The guide should enable an even greater proportion of complainants to address directly the body best equipped to deal with their complaint and lead to a further fall in the number of inadmissible complaints received by the Ombudsman.
Odbor za peticije spodbuja varuha, naj nadaljuje z dvojim ciljem, ki ga je razglasil v svojem letnem poročilu za 2006, namreč da si skupaj z institucijami prizadeva za širjenje dobrega upravljanja in okrepljeno komuniciranje, da bi bili državljani, ki morda potrebujejo njegove storitve, pravilno seznanjeni, kako to storiti.
The Committee on Petitions encourages the Ombudsman to continue the dual aim, he announced in his 2006 Annual Report, namely working with the institutions to promote good administration and increase the communication efforts so that citizens who might need to make use of his services are properly informed of how to do so.
S sprejetjem poročila z dne 18. junija 2008 o spremembi svojega Sklepa 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom z dne 9. marca 1994 o pravilih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic
With the adoption on 18 June 2008 of the report on a Decision amending its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties
A6-0076/2008 . , ki ga je varuh predlagal leta 2006, je Parlament pristal na kvalitativno razširitev varuhovih pooblastil brez poseganja v vrsto njegovih pristojnosti ali nezavezujoči značaj njegovih sklepov.
A6-0076/2008 , proposed by the Ombudsman in 2006, the Parliament agreed to a qualitative expansion of the Ombudsman's powers without affecting the nature of his competences or the non-binding effect of his decisions.
Najpomembnejša sprememba je, da bo imel varuh med svojimi preiskavami popoln dostop do dokumentov Evropske unije.
The most important changes guarantee that the Ombudsman will have full access to EU documents during his inquiries.
S podporo tem spremembam sta Evropski parlament in njegov odbor za peticije pokazala svoje zaupanje v varuhovo delo in njegova prizadevanja za izboljšanje storitev, ki jih lahko nudi državljanom ter tako krepi njihovo zaupanje v Evropsko unijo in njene institucije.
By supporting these changes, the European Parliament and its Committee on Petitions has demonstrated its confidence in the work of the Ombudsman and his efforts to improve the service that he can provide for citizens, thus strengthening their trust in the European Union and its institutions.
Namestniki (člen 78()), navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitute(s) under Rule 78() present for the final vote
s priporočili Komisiji o nadaljevanju Lamfalussyjevega procesa: prihodnja struktura nadzora
with recommendations to the Commission on Lamfalussy follow-up: future structure of supervision
PRILOGA K PREDLOGU RESOLUCIJE: PODROBNA PRIPOROČILA O VSEBINI ZAHTEVANEGA(ih) PREDLOGA(ov) 8
ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION: DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS on THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL(s) REQUESTED 8
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................15
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................14
– ob upoštevanju četrte direktive Sveta 78/660/EGS z dne 25. julija 1978 o letnih računovodskih izkazih posameznih vrst družb
– having regard to the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies
– ob upoštevanju sedme direktive Sveta 83/349/EGS z dne 13. junija 1983 o konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazih
– having regard to the Seventh Council Directive 83/349/EEC of 13 June 1983 based on the Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on consolidated accounts
– ob upoštevanju direktive Sveta 91/674/EGS z dne 19. decembra 1991 o letnih računovodskih izkazih in konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazih zavarovalnic
– having regard to Council Directive 91/674/EEC of 19 December 1991 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings
– ob upoštevanju direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 94/19/ES z dne 30. maja 1994 o sistemu zajamčenih vlog,
– having regard to Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes
– ob upoštevanju direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/24/ES z dne 4. aprila 2001 o reorganizaciji in prenehanju kreditnih institucij
– having regard to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions
UL L 125, 5.5.2001, str.
OJ L 125, 5.5.2001, p.