natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij - Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0689 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union ( COM(2006)0689 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije - Merjenje administrativnih stroškov in zmanjšanje administrativnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0691 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document - Measuring administrative costs and reducing administrative burdens in the European Union ( COM(2006)0691 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o Akcijskem programu za zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2007)0023 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union ( COM(2007)0023 ),
– ob upoštevanju pilotnega projekta „Zmanjševanje upravnih bremen“ (proračun EU 2007, poglavje 26 01, člen 08),
– having regard to the Pilot Project 'Minimising Administrative Burdens' (EU Budget 2007, chapter 26 01, article 08),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve in Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0275/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0275/2007 ),
A ker je vprašanje zmanjševanja z zakonodajo predpisanih upravnih stroškov eden izmed najpomembnejših vidikov splošnega cilja boljše pravne ureditve,
A. Whereas the issue of minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation is one of the most important aspects of the general aim of better regulation,
B. ker je treba oblikovati prilagodljivo in povezano sodelovanje z drugimi parlamentarnimi odbori o zadevah, ki imajo lahko velik vpliv na izvrševanje proračuna Evropske unije,
B. Whereas it is important to seek flexible and coherent cooperation with other committees in Parliament on subjects which might have a significant impact on the implementation of the budget of the European Union,
C. ker je poslanstvo Odbora za proračunski nadzor državljanom Evropske uniji zagotoviti učinkovito zbiranje in porabo sredstev skladov EU ter njihovo pravilno porazdelitev med naloge, ki jih mora EU opraviti, ker uresničevanje tega cilja zahteva od odbora, da razvije moderen, učinkovit in uspešen javni sistem odgovornosti EU, ki lahko zagotovi zanesljivo izvrševanje proračuna, boljše upravljanje in jasno odgovornost,
C. Whereas the mission of the Committee on Budgetary Control is to assure the citizens of the European Union that EU funds are raised and spent effectively and properly, and that they are correctly allocated to the tasks which the EU has been asked to perform; whereas to accomplish this aim the Committee strives to develop a modern, effective and efficient public EU accountability system which can ensure sound implementation of the budget, better governance and clear accountability,
D. ker je treba zakonodajne stroške, katerih del tvorijo upravne obveznosti, analizirati v širšem kontekstu, ki zajema gospodarske, socialne in okoljske stroške ter koristi zakonodaje, kot ključni deli boljše pravne ureditve pa morajo biti upoštevani tudi redni pregledi in integrirana analiza,
D. Whereas regulatory costs, of which administrative obligations are just one element, must be analysed in a broad context encompassing the economic, social and environmental costs and benefits of regulation, and that regular review and integrated analysis should be considered by all as key components of better regulation,
E. ker so stroški izpolnjevanja obveznosti vsi stroški izpolnjevanja obveznosti zakonodaje, z izjemo neposrednih finančnih stroškov in dolgoročnih posledic, in jih lahko v kontekstu standardnega modela stroškov razdelimo na stvarne stroške izpolnjevanja obveznosti in upravne stroške,
E. Whereas compliance costs are all the costs of complying with regulation, with the exception of direct financial costs and long term consequences and can, in the context of the Standard Cost Model, be divided into substantive compliance costs and administrative costs,
F. ker so upravni stroški opredeljeni kot stroški podjetij, prostovoljcev, javnih oblasti in državljanov, ki opravljajo splošne pravne obveznosti za zagotavljanje informacij o njihovem delu ali proizvodnji, tako za javne oblasti, kot za zasebne stranke,
F. Whereas administrative costs are defined as the costs incurred by enterprises, the voluntary sector, public authorities and citizens in meeting legal obligations to provide information on their action or production, either to public authorities or to private parties,
G. ker je Evropsko računsko sodišče večkrat izjavilo, da na podlagi svojih rezultatov revizije meni, da so eden glavnih razlogov za nepravilnosti povezana pravila in uredbe, ki ne dovoljujejo primernega upravljanja tveganj in močno ovirajo zakonito in pravilno porabo sredstev EU,
G. Whereas the European Court of Auditors has repeatedly stated that, on the basis of its audit results, it is of the opinion that one of the main causes of irregularities are the underlying rules and regulations, which do not allow for an adequate risk management and strongly hinder the legal and regular expenditure of EU funds,
H. ker lahko predlagani akcijski program za zmanjševanje upravnih bremen v Evropski uniji zmanjša upravno breme za 25 % leta 2012, zajema pa tudi zakonodajo Skupnosti in nacionalno zakonodajno breme, ki lahko vodi k srednjeročnemu povečanju stopnje BDP v EU za približno 1,4 % ali 150 milijard EUR
H. Whereas the proposed Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union could reduce administrative burdens by 25% in 2012, covering Community legislation as well as national regulatory burdens, which could lead to an increase in the level of EU GDP of approximately 1,4% or EUR 150 billion in the medium term
I. ker je Evropski svet 8. in 9. marca 2007 sklenil, da bo na podlagi pregleda, ki ga bo opravila Komisija, spomladi 2008 premislil ali so potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi ob upoštevanju različnih možnosti, vključno s skupino neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki bodo institucijam svetovali o njihovem delu za doseganje boljše pravne ureditve,
I. Whereas the European Council of 8 and 9 March 2007 decided that in Spring 2008, on the basis of a review by the Commission, it will consider whether further action is needed, taking into account different options, including a group of independent experts to advise the institutions on their work towards better regulation,
J. ker je Evropski svet z dne 8. in 9. marca 2007 podprl namen Komisije, da kot pilotni projekt oblikuje neodvisni strokovni odbor, ki bo Komisiji in državam članicam pomagal pri izvajanju akcijskega programa za zmanjševanje upravnih bremen,
J. Whereas the European Council of 8 and 9 March 2007 supported the intention of the Commission to set up, as a pilot project, an independent expert committee to assist the Commission and the Member States with the implementation of the Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens,
K. ker je zmanjševanje upravnega bremena pomemben ukrep za pospeševanje evropskega gospodarstva, zlasti z vplivom, ki ga ima na mala in srednje velika podjetja,
K. Whereas reducing administrative burdens is an important measure for boosting Europe's economy, especially through its impact on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs),
1. pozdravlja Medinstitucionalni sporazum o boljši pripravi zakonodaje in poziva Svet, Evropski parlament in Komisijo, da ga uresničujejo;
Welcomes the interinstitutional agreement on better lawmaking and calls on the Council, the Commission and Parliament to make this a reality;
3. se strinja, da je zakonodajno okolje, v katerem poslujejo podjetja, odločilno za konkurenčnost podjetij, trajnostno rast in zaposlovanje, ter da bi moral biti pomemben cilj politike EU zagotavljanje, da je sedanje in prihodnje zakonodajno okolje transparentno, jasno, učinkovito in na splošno visokokakovostno;
Agrees that the regulatory environment in which businesses operate is a determinant of their competitiveness, sustainable growth and employment performance, and that ensuring that the existing and future regulatory environment is transparent, clear, effective and generally of high quality should be an important objective of EU policy;
7. meni, da je pri zmanjševanju upravnih bremen za podjetja in državljane pomembno, da se Komisija naknadno posvetuje s ciljnimi skupinami, da določi kako učinkovito so bila upravna bremena zmanjšana;
Is of the opinion that it is important, with the reduction of administrative burdens for businesses and citizens, that the Commission consult ex-post target groups to determine to what extent administrative burdens have been effectively reduced;
10. poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o svojih trenutnih pobudah za zagotavljanje neposrednega posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi; meni, da je pomembno tudi, da Komisija izvede naknadno oceno, ki prikazuje dosežene rezultate;
Invites the Commission to report on its current initiatives to guarantee the direct consultation of stakeholders; feels that it is also important that the Commission carry out an ex-post evaluation that gives evidence of the results obtained;
13. meni, da je zelo pomembno preprečiti vse nepotrebne prenatrpanosti ali dodajanja k zakonodaji držav članic; poziva Komisijo, da pri izdajanju uredb in direktiv to upošteva; odločno poudarja, da Komisija jasno izrazi katere so najnižje zahteve uredb in direktiv;
Considers it very important to counteract any unnecessary gold-plating or topping-up of legislation by Member States; urges the Commission to take this into account when issuing regulations and directives; feels strongly that the Commission clearly states what the minimum requirements of regulations and directives are;
17. poziva Komisijo, da Parlamentu predstavi „projekt testiranja konkurenčnosti“, ki je trenutno še v pripravi, da bi omogočili izmenjavo mnenj pred začetkom njegovega izvajanja;
Invites the Commission to present to Parliament the 'project on competitiveness testing' currently under elaboration, in order to allow an exchange of views before it is put into place;
19. poudarja pomen boljšega izvajanja in uveljavljanja obstoječe zakonodaje v vseh državah članicah ter poziva h hitrim postopkom o ugotavljanju kršitev, da bi se zagotovilo enake pogoje delovanja; poziva Komisijo in države članice, da izboljšajo mehanizme za opredeljevanje zakonodaje, ki jo je treba poenostaviti;
Stresses the importance of better implementation and enforcement of existing legislation, across all Member States, and calls for infringement procedures to be rapid in order to ensure a level playing field; calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve mechanisms for identifying legislation which must be simplified;
25. ugotavlja opredelitev 13 prednostnih področij v akcijskem programu Komisije o razlogih, da je na teh področjih mogoče najti 80 % skupnega upravnega bremena; poudarja, da ta ocena temelji na nacionalnih izkušnjah in meritvah
Notes the identification of the 13 priority areas in the Commission's Action Programme on the reasoning that 80% of the total administrative burden is to be found in those areas; Emphasizes that this assessment is based on national experiences and measurements
"Pilotni projekt o upravnih obremenitvah", WIFO-CEPS, oktober 2006. ; se strinja s Komisijo o pragmatičnosti tega pristopa, vendar meni, da ga je treba razumeti kot prvo fazo;
'Pilot Project on Administrative Burdens', WIFO-CEPS, October 2006. ; agrees with the Commission that this approach is pragmatic, but feels it should be seen as a first phase;
28. poudarja, da mora Komisija, če meni, da ne more razporediti zadostnih sredstev in odobritev znotraj sedanjega upravnega okvira, določiti in sporočiti možne rešitve za reševanje teh problemov proračunskemu organu;
Stresses that if the Commission feels that it is unable to allocate sufficient resources and appropriations within the current administrative framework, it should pinpoint and communicate possible solutions to overcome those problems to the budgetary authority;
32. namerava v celoti uporabiti postopke presoje vplivov za določanje učinka predlogov sprememb na predloge ter poziva Svet, naj stori isto; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi potrebno pomoč in strokovno znanje;
Intends to fully apply impact assessment procedures to determine the effect of amendments to proposals, and calls on the Council to do the same; asks the Commission to provide the necessary assistance and expertise;
35. poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o svoji notranji organizacijski strukturi politike zmanjševanja upravnega bremena; poziva k primerjavi te strukture s strukturami, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, ki že izvajajo politiko zmanjševanja upravnega bremena;
Asks the Commission to report on its internal organisational set-up for the administrative burden reduction policy; Asks it to compare this set-up with the set-ups used in the various Member States that already have an administrative burden reduction policy in place;
Dokument o akcijskem programu Komisije za zmanjšanje upravnih bremen v Evropski uniji, 1. marec 2007. ;
Position paper on the European Commission's 'Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union', 1 March 2007. ;
42. poziva Komisijo, naj neodvisni skupini omogoči tudi izraziti stališče o sprejetih ukrepih v letih 2006 in 2007, ki oblikujejo politiko zmanjševanja upravnega bremena;
Asks the Commission to allow the independent panel also to comment on the steps already undertaken in 2006 and 2007 and which set up the administrative burden reduction policy;
o zmanjšanju administrativnih stroškov, ki jih nalaga zakonodaja
on minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje predloge:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. pozdravlja medinstitucionalni sporazum o pripravi boljše zakonodaje ter poziva Svet, Komisijo in Parlament, naj ga uresničijo;
Welcomes the interinstitutional agreement on better lawmaking and calls on the Council, the Commission and Parliament to make this a reality;
7. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se med izvajanjem smernic za presojo vplivov z raziskavo gospodarskih dejavnosti izboljša kakovost dejanskega vpliva; vztraja, da evropske institucije ali države članice presojo vplivov izvajajo natančno, pregledno in uravnoteženo, tako da bo v enaki meri vključen socialni, gospodarski in okoljski vidik;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that, during implementation of the impact assessment guidelines a study of economic activities improves the quality of the actual impact; insists that it is imperative that impact assessments, whether by a European institution or the Member States, are conducted in a thorough, transparent and balanced way, giving equal weight to social, economic and environmental aspects;
Bolje oblikovani predpisi so eden od ključnih elementov ponovne uvedbe lizbonske strategije, ki je opredelila potrebo po pospešitvi gospodarske rasti in ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest.
Better regulation is one of the key-elements of the re-launch of the Lisbon Strategy which identified the need to boost economic growth and job creation.
Pregledni kakovostni predpisi ne služijo le interesom industrije, temveč tudi evropskemu državljanu.
Transparent high quality regulation not only serves the interests of industry, but also the European citizen.
Temeljni cilj pobude za bolje oblikovane predpise naj bi bilo ustvarjanje večjega števila kakovostnih delovnih mest.
The ultimate aim of the Better Regulation exercise should be to create more quality jobs.
Sedanje sporočilo Komisije z naslovom „Bolje oblikovani predpisi za rast in delovna mesta“ temelji na pobudi Komisije z naslovom „Akcijski načrt o poenostavitvi in izboljšanju zakonodajnega okolja“, ki je del bele knjige o upravljanju v Evropi iz leta 2002, in medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o pripravi boljše zakonodaje, ki so ga decembra 2003 sprejeli Evropska komisija, Evropski parlament in Svet.
The present Commission Communication on "Better regulation for growth and jobs" builds on the Commission's initiative "Action Plan on simplifying and improving the regulatory environment" as part of the EU White Paper on Governance (2002) and the Inter-institutional Agreement on Better Lawmaking, agreed in December 2003 by the European Commission, European Parliament and the Council.
Sporočilo predlaga tri področja ukrepov:
The Communication proposes three action lines:
· nadaljnje spodbujanje oblikovanja in uporabe orodij za boljše predpise na ravni EU, predvsem glede presoje vplivov in poenostavitve,
· further promoting the design and application of better regulation tools at the EU level, notably in so far as impact assessments and simplification are concerned,
· tesnejše sodelovanje z državami članicami, da bodo načela bolje oblikovanih predpisov dosledneje uporabljali vsi zakonodajalci v EU,
· working closely with the Member States to ensure that better regulation principles are applied consistently throughout the EU by all regulators,
· krepitev konstruktivnega dialoga med vsemi zakonodajalci na ravni EU in na nacionalnih ravneh ter z interesnimi skupinami.
· reinforcing the constructive dialogue between all regulators at the EU and national levels and with stakeholders.
Poenostavitev obstoječe zakonodaje
Simplification of existing legislation
Pripravljavec osnutka se strinja s Komisijo, da se učinkovitost in izvršljivost zakonodaje lahko dosežeta z jasno in preprosto pripravo osnutka, pod pogojem, da se ohrani visoka raven kakovosti.
Your draftsperson agrees with the Commission that efficacy and enforceability of legislation can be served by clear and simple drafting, on the condition that the quality remains high.
Vseeno pa poudarja, da bolje oblikovani predpisi ne smejo pomeniti niti deregulacije niti krčenja ali porušenja socialnih standardov.
However, he stresses that better regulation should not mean deregulation nor relaxing or dismantling of social standards.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega želi pripravljavec osnutka poudariti še pomembnost boljšega izvajanja in uveljavljanja obstoječe socialne zakonodaje.
In this same light, your draftsman also wishes to underline the importance of better implementation and enforcement of already existing social legislation.
Presoja vplivov
Impact assessment
Komisija navaja, da namerava poglobiti presojo gospodarskih vplivov nove zakonodaje.
The Commission states that it intends to strengthen the assessment of economic impacts of new legislation.
Vseeno pa okrepitev gospodarskega vidika pri presoji vplivov ne sme ogroziti socialnih elementov.
This deepening of the economic pillar of the impact assessment should however not compromise the social elements duly being taken into account.
Možnim gospodarskim, socialnim in okoljskim vplivom nove zakonodaje je treba pripisati enak pomen.
Potential economic, social and environmental impacts of new legislation should be given equal weight.
Socialni dialog zagotavlja vključitev ustreznih interesnih skupin, hkrati pa prispeva k boljšemu ravnovesju interesov in bolj praktičnim rešitvam.
Social dialogue ensures the involvement of relevant stakeholders, while at the same time contributes to a better balance of interests and to more practical resolutions.
Treba ga je priznati kot učinkovito orodje koregulacije za večjo kakovost predpisov.
It should be recognised as a valid tool of co-regulation, that could serve the better quality of regulation.
Zato je treba socialni dialog okrepiti tako na evropski kot na nacionalni ravni.
Therefore, social dialogue should be reinforced both on the European and the national level.
Zmanjšanje administrativnih stroškov, ki jih nalaga zakonodaja
Minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker je Evropski parlament 16. maja 2006 sprejel naslednje resolucije:
A. Whereas on 16 May 2006 the European Parliament adopted the following resolutions:
- resolucijo o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2004: uporaba načela subsidiarnosti – 12. letno poročilo
- the resolution on better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity – 12th annual report
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0203 . , ki temelji na poročilu g.
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0203 . , based on the Doorn report;
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0204 . , ki temelji na poročilu ge.
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0204 . , based on the McCarthy report;
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0202 . , ki temelji na poročilu ge.
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0202 . , based on the Frassoni report;
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0205 . , ki temelji na poročilu g.
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0205 . , based on the Gargani report,
Mulderja o zniževanju upravnih stroškov, predpisanih z zakonodajo, ponovno navedene ugotovitve poročil g.
Notes that the Mulder report on minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation repeats the conclusions of the reports by Doorn, McCarthy, Frassoni and Gargani;
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/477/EGS o nadzoru nabave in posedovanja orožja
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/477/EEC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons
Alexander Alvaro , Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve
Alexander Alvaro , Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
(*) Okrepljeno sodelovanje med odbori - člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 29
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 31
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0093 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0093 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95(1) pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog (C6 0081/2006),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 (1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0081/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0276/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0276/2007 ),
(3) Zaradi pristopa Skupnosti k protokolu je treba spremeniti nekatere določbe Direktive 91/477/EGS.
(3) The accession of the Community to the Protocol makes it necessary to amend certain provisions of Directive 91/477/EEC.
Treba je namreč zagotoviti usklajeno, učinkovito in hitro izvedbo mednarodnih obveznosti, ki vplivajo na Direktivo.
Indeed, it is important to ensure the coherent, effective and rapid application of the international commitments affecting the Directive.
(3) Komisija je podpisala protokol v imenu Skupnosti 16. januarja 2002.
(3) The Commission signed the Protocol on behalf of the Community on 16 January 2002.