natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V uvodu programa ukrepov je zapisano, da je namen vzajemnega priznavanja "okrepiti sodelovanje med državami članicami in povečati varstvo pravic posameznika".
The introduction to the programme of measures states that mutual recognition is "designed to strengthen cooperation between Member States but also to enhance the protection of individual rights".
(3) Izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v kazenskih zadevah temelji na predpostavki, da države članice zaupajo v kazenskopravne sisteme drugih držav članic.
(3) Implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters presupposes that Member States have trust in each other's criminal justice systems.
Obseg izvajanja vzajemnega priznavanja je v veliki meri odvisen od vrste parametrov, ki vključujejo mehanizme za zaščito pravic osumljencev in skupne minimalne standarde, potrebne za lažje izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja.
The extent of the mutual recognition exercise is very much dependent on a number of parameters, which include mechanisms for safeguarding the rights of suspects and common minimum standards necessary to facilitate the application of the principle of mutual recognition.
(4) Vzajemno priznavanje lahko deluje učinkovito le v duhu zaupanja, kjer ne le sodni organi, temveč vsi udeleženci kazenskega postopka, priznavajo odločbe sodnih organov drugih držav članic kot enakovredne svojim lastnim, kar pomeni ne le zaupanje v ustreznost pravil partnerjev, ampak tudi zaupanje v pravilno izvajanje teh pravil.
(4) Mutual recognition can only operate effectively in a spirit of confidence, whereby not only judicial authorities, but all actors in the criminal process see decisions of the judicial authorities of other Member States as equivalent to their own, implying not only trust in the adequacy of one's partners' rules, but also trust that those rules are correctly applied.
(4a) S 6. členom Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP) in členom 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah je zagotovljena pravica do poštenega sojenja.
( 4a ) Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights enshrine the right to a fair trial.
Člen 48 listine zagotavlja spoštovanje pravic obrambe.
Article 48 of the Charter guarantees respect for the rights of the defence.
Ta direktiva spoštuje te pravice in se jo ustrezno izvaja.
This Directive respects these rights and has to be implemented accordingly.
(5) Čeprav so ▌države članice pogodbenice ▌ EKČP , izkušnje kažejo, da to samo po sebi vedno ne zagotavlja zadostne stopnje zaupanja v sisteme kazenskega pravosodja drugih držav članic.
(5) Although ▌Member States are parties to the ▌ ECHR ▌, experience has shown that this in itself does not always provide a sufficient degree of trust in the criminal justice systems of other Member States.
(5a) Za okrepitev vzajemnega zaupanja je treba bolj dosledno izvajati pravice in jamstva iz 6. člena EKČP.
( 5a ) Strengthening mutual trust requires a more consistent implementation of the rights and guarantees set out in Article 6 of the ECHR.
Prav tako je treba s to direktivo in drugimi ukrepi v Evropski uniji nadalje razviti minimalne standarde iz EKČP in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
It also requires, through this Directive and other measures, further development within the European Union of the minimum standards set out in the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
(6) Člen 82(2) Pogodbe določa da se določijo minimalna pravila, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah, in ki omogočajo lažje vzajemno priznavanje sodb in sodnih odločb ter policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami.
(6) Article 82(2) of the Treaty provides for the establishment of minimum rules applicable in the Member States so as to facilitate mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters having a cross-border dimension.
Točka (b) člena 82(2) določa, da so "pravice posameznikov v kazenskem postopku" eno izmed področij na katerem se lahko ustanovijo minimalna pravila.
Point (b) of Article 82(2) refers to "the rights of individuals in criminal procedure" as one of the areas in which minimum rules may be established.
(7) Skupna minimalna pravila bi morala pomeniti, da se bo povečalo zaupanje v kazenskopravne sisteme vseh držav članic, kar bi moralo v zameno pripeljati do bolj učinkovitega pravosodnega sodelovanja v duhu vzajemnega zaupanja.
(7) Common minimum rules should lead to increased confidence in the criminal justice systems of all Member States, which in turn should lead to more efficient judicial cooperation in a climate of mutual trust.
Takšna skupna minimalna pravila bi bilo treba uporabljati na področju tolmačenja in prevajanja v kazenskih postopkih.
Such common minimum rules should be applied in the fields of interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings.
(7a) Svet je 30. novembra 2009 sprejel Načrt za krepitev procesnih pravic osumljenih ali obtoženih oseb v kazenskih postopkih
( 7a ) On 30 November 2009, the Council adopted the Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected and accused persons in criminal proceedings
Načrt predvideva postopne korake za sprejetje ukrepov v zvezi s pravico do prevajanja in tolmačenja (ukrep A), pravico do informacij o pravicah in obtožnici (ukrep B), pravico do pravnega nasveta in pravne pomoči (ukrep C), pravico do komuniciranja s sorodniki, delodajalci in konzularnimi organi (ukrep D) ter v zvezi s posebnim varstvom za osumljence ali obtožence, ki spadajo v skupino ranljivih oseb (ukrep E).
Taking a step-by-step approach, the Roadmap calls for the adoption of measures regarding the right to translation and interpretation (measure A), the right to information on rights and information about the charges (measure B), the right to legal advice and legal aid (measure C), the right to communication with relatives, employers and consular authorities (measure D), and regarding special safeguards for suspected or accused persons who are vulnerable (measure E).
(7b) Evropski svet je v stockholmskem programu, ki je bil sprejet 10. decembra 2009, pozdravil načrt in ga vključil v program (točka 2.4).
( 7b ) In the Stockholm programme, adopted on 10 December 2009, the European Council welcomed the Roadmap and made it part of the Stockholm programme (point 2.4.).
Poudaril je, da je načrt še nedokončan, ter pozval Komisijo, naj še dodatno preuči elemente minimalnih procesnih pravic osumljenih ali obtoženih oseb, in oceni, ali je treba za boljše sodelovanje na tem področju preučiti tudi druga vprašanja, na primer domnevo nedolžnosti.
The European Council underlined the non-exhaustive character of the Roadmap, by inviting the Commission to examine further elements of minimum procedural rights for suspected and accused persons, and to assess whether other issues, for instance the presumption of innocence, need to be addressed, in order to promote better cooperation in this area.
(7c) Ta direktiva se nanaša na ukrep A iz načrta.
( 7c ) This Directive relates to measure A of the Roadmap.
Predpisuje skupne minimalne standarde, ki jih je treba izpolnjevati pri tolmačenju in prevajanju v kazenskih postopkih, da bi okrepili medsebojno zaupanje med državami članicami.
It lays down common minimum standards to be applied in the fields of interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings with a view to enhancing mutual trust among Member States.
(8) Pravici do tolmačenja in prevajanja za osebe, ki ne razumejo jezika postopka, sta določeni v 6. členu EKČP, kakor ga razlaga sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
(8) The rights to interpretation and to translation for those who do not understand the language of the proceedings are enshrined in Article 6 of the ECHR, as interpreted by the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
Določbe te direktive omogočajo lažje uveljavljanje teh pravic v praksi.
The provisions of this Directive facilitate the application of those rights in practice.
V ta namen naj bi ta direktiva osumljencu ali obtožencu zagotavljala pravico do tolmačenja in prevajanja v kazenskem postopku z namenom zaščite njegove pravice do poštenega sojenja .
To this end, this Directive intends to ensure the rights of a suspected or accused person to interpretation and to translation in criminal proceedings with a view to safeguarding the person's right to a fair trial.
(9) Pravice, ki jih določa ta direktiva, bi se morale uporabljati kot nujni spremljajoči ukrepi tudi pri ▌ izvrševanju evropskega naloga za prijetje v mejah, določenih v tej direktivi.
(9) The rights provided for in this Directive should also apply , as necessary accompanying measures, to ▌the execution of a European Arrest Warrant within the limits provided for by this Directive.
Izvršitvene države članice bi morale zagotoviti tolmačenje in prevajanje za zahtevano osebo, ki ne razume ali govori jezika postopka, ter kriti s tem povezane stroške.
Executing Members States should provide, and bear the costs for , interpretation and translation for the benefit of the requested person who does not understand or speak the language of the proceedings.
(9a) V nekaterih državah članicah je relativno manjše kršitve, na primer ponavljajoče se prometne prekrške, mogoče obravnavati tako, da sankcije naloži pristojni organ, ki ni sodišče, pristojno za kazenske zadeve, na primer pri opravljanju kontrol v prometu.
( 9a ) In some Member States, relatively minor offences, for example traffic offences which are committed on a large scale, may be responded to by imposing a sanction by a competent authority other than a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters, e.g. following a traffic control.
V takih okoliščinah bi bilo nerazumno od pristojnih organov zahtevati, naj zagotovijo spoštovanje vseh pravic iz te direktive.
In such situations, it would be unreasonable to require that the competent authorities should be able to provide all the rights under this Directive.
Kadar zakonodaja države članice predpisuje, da sankcije za manjše kršitve naloži organ, ki ni sodišče, pristojno za kazenske zadeve, da pa je zoper sankcije možna pritožba na to sodišče, se ta direktiva uporablja le za postopke pred tem sodiščem po takšni pritožbi.
Therefore, w here the law of a Member State provides for the imposition of a sanction regarding minor offences by an authority other than a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters, and that sanction may be appealed to such a court, then this Directive shall only apply to the proceedings before that court following such an appeal.
(10) Ta direktiva bi morala zagotavljati brezplačno in ustrezno jezikovno pomoč ter osumljencem in obtožencem, ki ne govorijo ali razumejo jezika, v katerem poteka kazenski postopek, omogočiti, da v polni meri uveljavljajo pravico do obrambe, in jim zagotoviti pravičen postopek.
(10) This Directive should ensure that there is free and adequate linguistic assistance , allowing suspected and accused persons who do not speak or understand the language of the criminal proceedings to fully exercise the right to defend themselves and safeguard the fairness of the proceedings .
(10a) Tolmačenje za osumljenca ali obtoženca mora biti zagotovljeno nemudoma.
( 10a ) Interpretation for the benefit of the suspected or accused person should be provided without delay.
Lahko se zgodi, da preteče nekaj časa, preden je tolmačenje zagotovljeno, ne da bi bila s tem kršena zahteva po nudenju tolmačenja brez zamude, kadar je zaradi okoliščin danega primera to razumljivo.
In a given case, it could happen that a certain period of time elapses before interpretation is provided, without this constituting an infringement of the requirement that the interpretation should be provided without delay, as long as this is reasonable in the circumstances.
(10b) Komuniciranje med osumljencem ali obtožencem in njegovim pravnim svetovalcem je treba tolmačiti v skladu s določbami te direktive.
( 10b ) Communication between the suspected or accused person and his legal counsel should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of this Directive.
Osumljenec ali obtoženec bi med drugim moral biti zmožen svojemu pravnemu svetovalcu pojasniti svojo različico dogodkov, opozoriti na izjave, s katerimi se ne strinja, in ga seznaniti z dejstvi, ki bi se morala predložiti pri njegovi obrambi.
The suspected or accused person should be able, inter alia, to explain his version of the events to his legal counsel, point out any statements with which he disagrees and make his legal counsel aware of any facts that should be put forward in his defence.
(10c) Da bi obrambi omogočili pripravo, je treba tolmačiti komuniciranje med osumljencem ali obtožencem in njegovim pravnim svetovalcem, kadar je vsebina pogovora neposredno povezana z zaslišanjem med postopkom, z vložitvijo pritožbe ali drugih prošenj v postopku, kot je prošnja za varščino, kadar je to potrebno za zagotovitev pravičnega postopka.
( 10c ) In order to allow the preparation of the defence, communication between the suspected or accused person and his legal counsel in direct connection with any questioning or hearing during the proceedings, or with the lodging of an appeal or other procedural applications, such as for bail, should be interpreted where this is necessary for the purpose of ensuring the fairness of the proceedings.
(10d) Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da je vzpostavljen postopek ali mehanizem za ugotavljanje, ali osumljenec ali obtoženec razume in govori jezik kazenskega postopka ter ali potrebuje pomoč tolmača.
( 10d ) Member States should ensure that there is a procedure or mechanism in place to ascertain whether the suspected or accused person understands and speaks the language of the criminal proceedings and needs the assistance of an interpreter.
Takšen postopek ali mehanizem predvideva, da pristojni organ na kakršen koli ustrezen način preveri, ali osumljenec ali obtoženec razume in govori jezik kazenskega postopka ter ali potrebuje pomoč tolmača, in sicer tudi tako, da se z njim pogovori.
Such procedure or mechanism implies that the competent authority verifies in any appropriate manner, including by consulting the suspected or accused person concerned, whether he understands and speaks the language of the criminal proceedings and whether he needs the assistance of an interpreter.
(10e) Tolmačenje in prevajanje v skladu s to direktivo bi moralo biti zagotovljeno v maternem jeziku osumljenca ali obtoženca ali v kakem drugem jeziku, ki ga razume in ki mu dopušča, da v polni meri uveljavlja svojo pravico to obrambe, ter ki zagotavlja pravičen postopek.
( 10e ) Interpretation and translation in application of this Directive should be provided in the native language of the suspected or accused person or in any other language that he understands and that allows him to fully exercise the right to defend himself, and guaranteeing the fairness of the proceedings.
(10f) Spoštovanje pravice do tolmačenja in prevajanja iz te direktive ne bi smelo vplivati na nobeno drugo procesno pravico, ki jo predpisuje nacionalna zakonodaja.
( 10f ) The respect for the rights to interpretation and to translation contained in this Directive should not compromise any other procedural right provided under national law.
(11a) Države članice morajo zagotoviti nadzor nad ustreznostjo nudenega tolmačenja in prevajanja, kadar so bili pristojni organi za določen primer opozorjeni.
( 11a ) Member States should ensure that control can be exercised over the adequacy of the interpretation and translation provided when the competent authorities have been put on notice in a given case.
(12) Osumljenec ali obtoženec ali oseba, ki je v postopku za izvrševanje evropskega naloga za prijetje, mora imeti pravico do ugovarjanja ugotovitvi, da tolmačenje ni potrebno, v skladu s postopki iz nacionalne zakonodaje.
(12) The suspected or accused person or the person subject to proceedings for the execution of a European Arrest Warrant should have the right to challenge the finding that there is no need for interpretation , in accordance with procedures in national law .
Ta pravica ne pomeni, da so države članice dolžne zagotoviti ločeni mehanizem ali pritožbeni postopek, prek katerega bi se lahko ugovarjalo takšni ugotovitvi, in ne posega v časovne roke, ki veljajo pri izvrševanju evropskega naloga za prijetje.
This right does not entail the obligation for Member States to provide for a separate mechanism or complaint procedure in which such finding may be challenged and should not prejudice the time limits applicable to the execution of a European Arrest Warrant.
(12a) Kadar je ocenjeno, da kakovost tolmačenja ni dovolj visoka, da bi zagotavljala pravico do poštenega sojenja, bi moral biti pristojni organ zmožen zamenjati imenovanega tolmača.
( 12a ) When the quality of the interpretation is considered insufficient to guarantee the right to a fair trial, the competent authorities should be able to replace the appointed interpreter.
(14) Dolžnost skrbeti za osumljence ali obtožence v morebitno slabšem položaju, zlasti zaradi fizične prizadetosti, ki vpliva na njihovo zmožnost učinkovitega sporazumevanja, je podlaga za pravično sojenje.
(14) The duty of care towards suspected or accused persons who are in a potentially weak position, in particular because of physical impairments which affect their ability to communicate effectively, underpins a fair administration of justice.
Tožilstvo, organi pregona in sodni organi bi zato morali zagotoviti, da te osebe lahko učinkovito uveljavljajo pravice, ki izhajajo iz te direktive, na primer tako, da posebno pozornost namenijo morebitni ranljivosti, ki vpliva na njihovo zmožnost spremljanja postopka in njihovo razumljenost, ter da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev teh pravic.
The prosecution, law enforcement and judicial authorities should therefore ensure that these persons are able to exercise effectively the rights provided for in this Directive, for example by paying attention to any potential vulnerability that affects their ability to follow the proceedings and make themselves understood, and by taking appropriate steps to ensure these rights.
(14a) Pri uporabi videokonference za namene tolmačenja na daljavo lahko pristojni organi uporabijo orodja, ki se jih razvija v okviru evropskega e-pravosodja (na primer informacije o sodiščih, ki imajo opremo ali naprave za izvedbo videokonference).
( 14a ) When employing videoconferencing for the purpose of remote interpretation, the competent authorities could rely on the tools that are being developed in the context of the European e ‑Justice (e.g. information on courts with videoconferencing equipment or manuals).
(14b) To direktivo je treba oceniti na podlagi pridobljenih praktičnih izkušenj.
( 14b ) This Directive should be evaluated in the light of the practical experience gained.
Če je to potrebno za izboljšanje zaščitnih ukrepov, ki jih določa, se jo spremeni.
If appropriate, it should be amended so as to improve the safeguards which it lays down.
(15) Za zagotovitev pravičnosti postopka bi bilo treba v skladu z določbami te direktive za osumljenca ali obtoženca prevesti ključne dokumente ali vsaj bistvene dele takšnih dokumentov. ▌ Nekateri dokumenti bi v ta namen vedno morali veljati za ključne, zato bi jih bilo treba prevesti, denimo, odločbe o odvzemu prostosti zadevni osebi, obtožnica in vse sodbe.
(15) Safeguarding the fairness of the proceedings requires that essential documents, or at least the relevant passages of such documents, be translated for the benefit of the suspected or accused person in accordance with the provisions of this Directive . ▌ Some documents should always be considered essential for that purpose, and therefore be translated, such as the decision depriving a person of his liberty, the charge or indictment and any judgment.
Organi držav članic naj na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo osumljenca ali obtoženca ali njegovega pravnega svetovalca odločijo, kateri drugi dokumenti so prav tako ključni za zagotovitev pravičnega postopka in bi jih zato bilo treba prevesti.
It is up to the authorities of the Member States to decide, on their own motion or upon a request of the suspected or accused person or his legal counsel, which other documents are essential to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings, and should therefore be translated as well.
(16a) Države članice bi morale poenostaviti dostop do nacionalnih zbirk podatkov o sodnih tolmačih in prevajalcih, kadar takšne zbirke obstajajo.
( 16a ) Member States should facilitate access to national databases of legal translators and interpreters where these databases exist.
S tem v zvezi bi bilo treba posebno pozornost nameniti lažjemu dostopu do obstoječih zbirk podatkov prek portala e-pravosodja, kot je predvideno v akcijskemu načrtu za evropsko e-pravosodje z dne 27. novembra 2008
In this context, particular attention should be paid to the aim of providing access to existing databases through the E-Justice portal, as planned in the European e-Justice action plan of 27 November 2008
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost razširitve pravic iz direktive, da bi zagotovile višjo raven zaščite tudi v primerih, ki v direktivi niso izrecno obravnavani.
Member States should be able to extend the rights set out in this Directive in order to provide a higher level of protection also in situations not explicitly dealt with in this Directive.
Raven varstva ne sme biti nikoli nižja od standardov, ki jih zagotavljata EKČP ali Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, kakor ju razlaga sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije.
The level of protection should never go below the standards provided by the European Convention on Human Rights or the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as interpreted in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights or the European Court of Justice.
(18) ▌Določbe te direktive, ki ustrezajo pravicam, zagotovljenim z EKČP ali listino, se razlagajo in izvajajo skladno s pravicami, kakor so se razvile s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije .
(18) ▌The provisions of this Directive which correspond to rights guaranteed by the ECHR or by the Charter should be interpreted and implemented consistently with those rights, as developed in the relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union .
(19) Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer doseganja skupnih minimalnih pravil, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ga je mogoče zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa, lažje doseči na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
(19) Since the objective of this Directive, that is, achieving common minimum standards, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as referred to and defined in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenega cilja.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(19a) V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Velike Britanije in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, sta Velika Britanija in Irska sporočili, da želita sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te direktive.
( 19a ) In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the Position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the United Kingdom and Ireland have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Directive.