natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice lahko z odstopanjem dovolijo proizvodnjo in vgradnjo nadomestnih motorjev, ki ne ustrezajo zahtevam stopnje III A, v naslednjih primerih:
By way of derogation, Member States may authorise the production and the mounting of replacement engines that do not comply with Stage III A requirements, in the following cases:
i) za obnovitev ali nadgradnjo obstoječega vagona, vlakovne kompozicije ali lokomotive, kadar bi zaradi uporabe zahtev stopnje III A prišlo do večjih tehničnih težav pri tirni širini, osni obremenitvi, oblikovanju konstrukcije/šasije ali nadzornih sistemih večoperativnih motorjev, kar bi posledično ogrozilo ekonomsko upravičenost projekta;
i) for a renewal or upgrading of an existing railcar, train-set or locomotive, when the application of Stage III A requirements would raise important technical difficulties in terms of gauge, axle load, body/chassis design or engine(s) control systems for multiple operation and, as a consequence, compromise the economic viability of the project;
ii) kadar bi po nesreči ali katastrofalni okvari motorja (ali motorjev) vagona, vlakovne kompozicije ali lokomotive zaradi uporabe zahtev stopnje III A prišlo do večjih tehničnih težav, kar bi posledično ogrozilo stroškovno učinkovito popravilo poškodovanega vagona, vlakovne kompozicije ali lokomotive.
ii) where, following a railcar, train-set or locomotive accident or a catastrophic failure of its engine(s), the application of Stage III A requirements would raise important technical difficulties and, as a consequence, compromise the cost-effective repair of the damaged railcar, train-set or locomotive.
Za te motorje ne velja člen 9(3g), (3i) in (4a).
For these engines, Article 9 (3g), (3i) and (4a) shall not apply.
Kadar velja odstopanje, mora država članica, ki odstopanje dovoli, v šestih mesecih Komisiji in homologacijskim organom drugih držav članic predložiti dokument v papirnati in elektronski obliki, ki vsebuje:
Where derogation is granted, the Member State granting the derogation shall, within six months, provide both the Commission and the approval authorities of the other Member States with a document, in both paper form and electronic format, which sets out:
– posebno referenčno številko odstopanja, navedeno na oznaki, pritrjeni na vsak motor, na katerega se nanaša,
— the unique reference number of the derogation as shown on the label attached to each engine to which it refers,
– naravo odstopanja, vključno z opisom vrednosti emisij v primerjavi z mejnimi vrednostmi stopnje III A in podrobnostmi o alternativnih določbah, ki se bodo uporabljale,
— the nature of the derogation, including the description of the emission levels compared with Stage III A thresholds and details of the alternative provisions which will be applied,
– podrobno utemeljitev, zakaj je odstopanje dovolila, vključno z glavnimi tehničnimi težavami, njihovimi ekonomskimi in okoljskimi posledicami, ter opis prizadevanj na področju oblikovanja, namenjenih približevanju zahtevam stopnje III A in po potrebi opis ukrepov za razvoj ostalega voznega parka ter operativnih ukrepov,
— a detailed justification for granting the derogation, including the main technical difficulties, with their economic and environmental consequences, and a description of the design efforts made in order to approach Stage III A requirements, and, if need be, other fleet evolution and operating measures,
– število motorjev, za katere velja odstopanje,
— the number of engines which are subject to the derogation,
– podatke o proizvajalcu, tipe in serijske številke motorjev, za katere velja odstopanje,
— details of the manufacturer and of the types and serial numbers of the engines which are subject to the derogation,
– vse ostale informacije, ki lahko utemeljijo zahtevo po odstopanju.
— any other information helping to justify the request for a derogation
Za motorje, dane na trg v skladu z odstavki 1a, 1b in 1c, se na oznako, ki se pritrdi na motor ali doda navodilom za uporabo, napiše „NADOMESTNI MOTOR“.“
For engines placed on the market under paragraphs 1a, 1b and 1c, the text ‘REPLACEMENT ENGINE’ shall be attached to a label on the engine or inserted into the owner's manual."
Ker razpoložljivi prostor v večini starejših vozil ne zadostuje za vgraditev motorjev enake moči, skladnih s stopnjo III B, bi zamenjava motorjev stopnje pred III A in stopnje III A v starejših vozilih z motorji, skladnim s stopnjo III A, industriji omogočila premik k čistejšim emisijskim standardom stopnje III A.
"Because the space available in most earlier vehicles is not sufficient to accommodate IIIB compliant engines of the same power, the possibility to replace pre-IIIA and IIIA engines fitted in early vehicles with IIIA compliant engines will allow the industry to move forward to the cleaner IIIA emission standards.
V zelo redkih primerih bodo potrebna tudi odstopanja za uveljavitev III A, zaradi omejitev pri tirni širini, osni obremenitvi in oblikovanju vozil.
In a very few cases, derogations to the installation of IIIA will also be necessary because of the gauge, axle load and design limits of the vehicles.
Industrija se strinja, da se lahko vsako tako odstopanje dovoli zgolj ob strogem nadzoru in omejitvah ter s podrobnimi utemeljitvami.
The industry agrees that any such derogation shall only be made under strict controls and limitations and with detailed justifications."
(8) Sistem prožnosti se v skladu z določbami oddelka 1.2 Priloge XIII uporablja za prehod s stopnje III A na stopnjo III B ter preneha veljati 31. decembra 2013.
(8) The flexibility scheme, in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.2 of Annex XIII, shall apply only for the transition from Stage III A to Stage III B and expire on 31 December 2013.
Za lokomotive, ki lahko delujejo v železniškem omrežju v Združenem kraljestvu, sistem prožnosti izjemoma preneha veljati 31. decembra 2015.
By way of exception, for locomotives capable of operating on the UK rail network, the flexibility scheme shall expire on 31 December 2015.
Predlog direktive – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a directive ‑ amending act
Priloga XIII – oddelek 1 – točka 1.1
Annex XIII – section 1 ‑ point 1.1
Proizvajalec originalne opreme, ki želi uporabiti sistem prožnosti, kateri koli homologacijski organ zaprosi za dovoljenje, razen v prehodnem obdobju med stopnjo III A in stopnjo III B, da lahko od svojega dobavitelja motorjev kupi količine motorjev iz oddelkov 1.1.1. in 1.1.2., ki ne izpolnjujejo trenutno veljavnih mejnih vrednosti emisij, vendar so homologirani glede na najbližjo predhodno stopnjo mejnih vrednosti emisij.
With the exception of the transition period between Stage III A and Stage III B, an OEM that wishes to make use of the flexibility scheme shall request permission from any approval authority to purchase from his engine suppliers, the quantities of engines described in sections 1.1.1. and 1.1.2., that do not comply with the current emission limit values, but are approved to the nearest previous stage of emission limits.
Proizvajalec originalne opreme, ki želi uporabiti sistem prožnosti, kateri koli homologacijski organ zaprosi za dovoljenje in ga prejme brez nepotrebnega odlašanja , razen v prehodnem obdobju med stopnjo III A in stopnjo III B, da lahko od svojega dobavitelja motorjev kupi količine motorjev iz oddelkov 1.1.1. in 1.1.2., ki ne izpolnjujejo trenutno veljavnih mejnih vrednosti emisij, vendar so homologirani glede na najbližjo predhodno stopnjo mejnih vrednosti emisij.
With the exception of the transition period between Stage III A and Stage III B, an OEM that wishes to make use of the flexibility scheme shall request , and receive without unnecessary delay, permission from any approval authority to purchase from his engine suppliers, the quantities of engines described in sections 1.1.1. and 1.1.2., that do not comply with the current emission limit values, but are approved to the nearest previous stage of emission limits.
Predlog direktive – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a directive ‑amending act
Priloga XIII – oddelek 1 – točka 1.4
Annex XIII – section 1 ‑ point 1.4
1.4 Za motorje za pogon lokomotiv lahko proizvajalec originalne opreme v prehodnem obdobju med stopnjo III A in stopnjo III B zaprosi za dovoljenje, da njegovi dobavitelji motorjev v okviru sistema prožnosti lahko dajo na trg največ 40 motorjev za pogon lokomotiv.
1.4 As regards engines for use in propulsion of locomotives, during the transition period between Stage III A and Stage III B an OEM may seek permission for his engine suppliers to place on the market a maximum of 40 engines for use in propulsion of locomotives under the flexibility scheme.
Proizvajalec originalne opreme vsakemu homologacijskemu organu v državah članicah na zahtevo predloži vse informacije, ki jih ta homologacijski organ zahteva, da potrdi, ali so motorji v okviru sistema prožnosti ustrezno označeni in dani na trg.“
The OEM shall provide any requesting type approval authority in the Member States, with any information that the type approval authority requires in order to confirm that any engines claimed to be, or labelled as being, placed on the market under a flexibility scheme is properly so claimed or labelled.
Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Carlo Fidanza, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Juozas Imbrasas, Ville Itälä, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Kumucakos (Georgios Koumoutsakos), Werner Kuhn, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Gesine Meissner, Hella Ranner, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Olga Sehnalová, Brian Simpson, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Peter van Dalen, Dominique Vlasto, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Carlo Fidanza, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Juozas Imbrasas, Ville Itälä, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Werner Kuhn, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Gesine Meissner, Hella Ranner, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Olga Sehnalová, Brian Simpson, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Peter van Dalen, Dominique Vlasto, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Elisabetta Gardini, Julie Girling, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Gilles Pargneaux, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Bogusław Sonik, Salvatore Tatarella, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Elisabetta Gardini, Julie Girling, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Gilles Pargneaux, Antonyia Parvanova, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Theodoros Skylakakis, Bogusław Sonik, Salvatore Tatarella, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
João Ferreira, Jutta Haug, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bill Newton Dunn, Bart Staes, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Thomas Ulmer, Marita Ulvskog, Anna Záborská
João Ferreira, Jutta Haug, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bill Newton Dunn, Bart Staes, Eleni Theocharous, Thomas Ulmer, Marita Ulvskog, Anna Záborská
o bonitetnih agencijah: prihodnje perspektive
on credit rating agencies: future perspectives
– ob upoštevanju sestavka Mednarodne organizacije komisij za vrednostne papirje (IOSCO) z naslovom „International cooperation in oversight of credit rating agencies“ (Mednarodno sodelovanje pri nadzoru bonitetnih agencij) iz marca 2009,
– having regard to the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) note of March 2009 on ‘International cooperation in oversight of credit rating agencies’,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Skupnega foruma z naslovom „Stocktaking on the use of credit ratings“ (Pregled stanja glede uporabe bonitetnih ocen) iz junija 2009,
– having regard to the Joint Forum on ‘Stocktaking on the use of credit ratings’ in June 2009,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za finančno stabilnost z naslovom „Improving financial regulation“ (Izboljšanje finančne zakonodaje), namenjenega voditeljem skupine G20, z dne 25. septembra 2009,
– having regard to the report of the Financial Stability Board to G20 leaders entitled ‘Improving financial regulation’ of 25 September 2009,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Mednarodnega denarnega sklada z naslovom „Global Financial Stability Report: Sovereigns, Funding and Systemic Liquidity“ (Svetovna finančna stabilnost: države, financiranje in likvidnost sistema) z dne 29. oktobra 2010,
– having regard to the International Monetary Fund report of 29 October 2010 entitled ‘Global Financial Stability Report: Sovereigns, Funding and Systemic Liquidity’,
– ob upoštevanju izjave z vrhunskega srečanja skupine G20 v Torontu 26. in 27. junija 2010,
– having regard to the declaration of the G20 Toronto Summit of 26 and 27 June 2010,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za finančno stabilnost z naslovom „Principles for reducing reliance on CRA ratings“ (Načela za zmanjševanje zanašanja na ocene bonitetnih agencij) z dne 27. oktobra 2010,
– having regard to the report by the Financial Stability Board on ‘Principles for reducing reliance on CRA ratings’ of 27 October 2010,
– ob upoštevanju javnega posvetovanja, ki ga je Komisija začela 5. novembra 2010,
– having regard to the public consultation launched by the Commission on 5 November 2010,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0081/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0081/2011 ),
A. ker pozdravlja trenutno delo na svetovni, mednarodni in evropski ravni na področju regulacije bonitetnih agencij,
A. whereas it welcomes the ongoing work at global, international and European level on the regulation of credit rating agencies (CRAs),
B. ker naj bi bile bonitetne agencije posrednice informacij, ki zmanjšujejo asimetrije informacij na kapitalskih trgih in olajšujejo dostop do globalnega trga, znižujejo stroške informacij in širijo skupino možnih posojilojemalcev in vlagateljev ter tako zagotavljajo likvidnost in preglednost na trgih in lajšajo določanje cen,
B. whereas CRAs are supposed to be information intermediaries, reducing information asymmetries in the capital markets and facilitating global market access, reducing information costs and widening the potential pool of borrowers and investors, thus providing liquidity and transparency to markets and helping find prices,
C. ker so v novi zakonodaji bonitetne agencije dobile novo vlogo, ki jo je mogoče opredeliti kot vlogo „potrjevanja“, kar odraža dejstvo, da so bonitetne ocene vse bolj vgrajene v regulativne kapitalske zahteve,
C. whereas, in recent legislation, CRAs have been assigned another role which can be classified as one of ‘certification’, reflecting the fact that ratings are increasingly embedded in regulatory capital requirements,
D. ker se finančni subjekti preveč zanašajo na presojo bonitetnih agencij,
D. whereas financial operators have placed excessive reliance on the judgments made by CRAs,
E. ker bonitetne agencije ocenjujejo tri različne sektorje, namreč javni sektor, podjetja in strukturirane finančne instrumente, in ker so bonitetne agencije z napačnimi ocenami strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov, ki jih je bilo treba med krizo v povprečju znižati za tri do štiri stopnje, igrale pomembno vlogo pri nastanku finančne krize,
E. whereas CRAs rate three different sectors, the public sector, companies and structured finance instruments, and whereas CRAs played a significant role in the build-up to the financial crisis through the assignment of faulty ratings to structured finance instruments, which had to be downgraded on average three to four notches during the crisis,
F. ker je bila Uredba (ES) št. 1060/2009 prvi odziv na finančno krizo, ki že obravnava najbolj pereča vprašanja in za bonitetne agencije določa nadzor in regulacijo; ker pa ne obravnava vseh temeljnih težav in v resnici ustvarja nekaj novih vstopnih ovir,
F. whereas Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 was the first reaction to the financial crisis and already deals with the most pressing issues, subjecting CRAs to oversight and regulation; whereas, however, it does not address all the fundamental problems and, in fact, creates some new barriers to entry,
G. ker pomanjkanje regulativne varnosti v tem sektorju ogroža pravilno delovanje finančnih trgov EU in bi morala zato Komisija, preden predlaga nadaljnje spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009, pravilno prepoznati vrzeli v novem okviru in zagotoviti oceno učinka na vrsto drugih možnosti, ki so na voljo za zapolnitev takih vrzeli, vključno z možnostjo nadaljnjih zakonodajnih predlogov,
G. whereas the absence of regulatory certainty in this sector is putting the proper functioning of EU financial markets at risk and therefore requires the EU Commission, before coming forward with further amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009, to identify properly the gaps in the new framework and provide an impact assessment on the range of alternatives available to fill such gaps including the possibility of further legislative proposals.
H. ker se panoga bonitetnega ocenjevanja sooča s številnimi težavami, med katerimi so najpomembnejše pomanjkanje konkurence, oligopolne strukture ter pomanjkanje odgovornosti in preglednosti; ker je težava prevladujočih bonitetnih agencij zlasti v plačilnem modelu in ker je ključna težava regulativnega sistema preveliko zanašanje na zunanje bonitetne ocene,
H. whereas the credit rating industry has various problems, amongst which the most important are the lack of competition, oligolistic structures and the lack of accountability and transparency; whereas a problem of the dominant rating agencies in particular is the payment model and whereas the regulatory system’s key problem is over-reliance on external credit ratings,
I. ker bi bil najboljši način za okrepitev konkurence oblikovanje regulativnega okolja, ki bi učinkovito spodbujalo vstop, ter poglobljena analiza sedanjih vstopnih ovir ter drugih dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na konkurenco,
I. whereas the best way to enhance competition would be to create a regulatory environment effective at promoting entry, and to undertake a deeper analysis of the current barriers to entry and other factors affecting competition,
J. ker v dobrih časih udeleženci na trgu pogosto napačno ocenijo metodologijo in pomen bonitetnih ocen, katerih namen je opredeliti verjetnost neizpolnitve obveznosti, ali ju ne upoštevajo,
J. whereas, in good times, market participants tend to mistake or disregard the underlying methodology and meaning of credit ratings, which seek to pin down the probability of default,
K. ker so zadnji dogodki v krizi evra osvetlili pomembno vlogo bonitetnih ocen državnih dolžniških instrumentov, pa tudi nedoslednost in procikličnost pri regulativni uporabi ocen,
K. whereas the recent developments in the euro crisis have highlighted the significant role of sovereign debt ratings and both inconsistency and pro-cyclicality in the regulatory use of ratings,
L. ker je neodvisnost ocen od trga in političnega vmešavanja bistvena ter jo je treba zagotoviti ne glede na nove strukture in poslovne modele, ki se lahko pojavijo, ter v okviru gospodarskega upravljanja in testov izjemnih situacij,
L. whereas independence of ratings from market and political interference is paramount and must be ensured whatever the new structures and business models that may emerge and in the context of economic governance and stress tests,
M. ker se ocene sicer lahko in tudi se spreminjajo zaradi temeljnih prilagoditev profilu tveganja ali novim informacijam, čeprav bi morale biti zasnovane stabilno, ne pa da nihajo na podlagi razmer na trgu,
M. while ratings can and do change as a result of fundamental adjustments to risk profile or new information, they should be designed to be stable and not fluctuate on the basis of market sentiment,
N. ker je sistem Basel II povzročil pretirano zanašanje na zunanje ocene, kar je v nekaterih primerih privedlo do tega, da so se banke odrekle opravljanju samostojnih ocen o svoji izpostavljenosti,
N. whereas the Basel II system has resulted in excessive reliance on external ratings, leading in some cases to banks deciding against performing autonomous assessments of their exposures,
O. ker je nedavno sprejeta ureditev bonitetnih ocen v Združenih državah v obliki Dodd-Frankovega zakona prinesla manjše regulativno zanašanje na presojo agencij,
O. whereas recent regulation of ratings in the United States, with the Dodd-Frank Act, has opted for less regulatory reliance on agencies’ judgments,
Makroraven: regulacija finančnega trga
Macro level : f inancial m arket r egulation
4. opozarja na pomanjkljivosti v standardiziranem pristopu v baselskem regulativnem okviru, ki omogoča določanje regulativnih kapitalskih zahtev za finančne institucije na podlagi zunanjih bonitetnih ocen; meni, da je pomembna vzpostavitev okvira kapitalske ustreznosti, ki bo zagotavljal trdno notranjo oceno tveganja, boljši nadzor nad tako oceno ter izboljšan dostop do informacij, povezanih s posojili; v zvezi s tem podpira večjo uporabo pristopa na osnovi notranjih bonitetnih ocen, če je ta zanesljiv in varen ter so velikost, zmogljivost in izkušenost finančne institucije primerne za ustrezno oceno tveganj; meni, da je za zagotovitev enakih konkurenčnih pogojev pomembno, da notranji modeli spoštujejo parametre, ki so predpisani v uredbi EU, ter da mora zanje veljati strog postopek validacije nadzornih organov; hkrati meni, da bi manjši in manj izkušeni igralci z manjšimi zmogljivostmi morali imeti možnost uporabe zunanjih bonitetnih ocen, če ni možna notranja ocena kreditnega tveganja, pod pogojem, da izpolnjujejo ustrezne zahteve glede potrebne skrbnosti;
Points to shortcomings in the standardised approach in the Basel regulatory framework allowing regulatory capital requirements for financial institutions to be set on the basis of external credit ratings; considers it important to establish a capital adequacy framework that ensures robust internal risk assessment, better oversight of such risk assessment, and improved access to credit-relevant information; supports in this respect the increased use of the internal-ratings-based (IRB) approach provided that it is reliable and safe and that the size, capacity and sophistication of the financial institution allow for an adequate risk assessment; considers that in order to ensure a level playing field it is important that internal models respect parameters prescribed in the EU regulation and be subject to rigorous supervisory validation; considers, at the same time, that smaller and less sophisticated players with lower capacities should be able to use external ratings, if no internal credit risk assessment is viable, provided that they fulfil appropriate due diligence requirements;