natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato se ne more strinjati z zgornjim mnenjem.
Consequently, it cannot subscribe to the above opinion.
Po mnenju pravne službe Sveta pomeni sprememba direktive v uredbo bistveno spremembo vseh določb direktive, ki v skladu s členom 249 Pogodbe ES tako niso več zavezujoče le glede cilja, ki ga je treba doseči, medtem ko prepuščajo nacionalnim organom izbiro oblike in metod, temveč postanejo zavezujoče v celoti in se neposredno uporabljajo v vseh državah članicah.
In the view of the Council Legal Service, the transformation of a directive into a regulation implies a substantive change of all provisions of the directive, which, in accordance with Article 249 of the EC Treaty, are no longer binding only as to the result to be achieved, while leaving to the national authorities the choice of form and methods, but become binding in their entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Ta sprememba ni zgolj „formalna ali redakcijska“ (gl. drugo alineo točke 4 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 28. novembra 2001).
This change is not "purely formal or editorial" (see point 4, second indent of the IIA of 28 November 2001).
Zato bi zakonodajni organ moral imeti možnost spremeniti vse določbe zadevnega akta, da bi se upoštevala njihova neposredna uporaba, ne glede na to, da naj bi bile te določbe tehnične narave in že v celoti prenesene v nacionalno zakonodajo vseh držav članic.
Hence, the legislative authority should be able to modify all provisions of the act concerned to take account of the fact that they become directly applicable, independently of whether these provisions appear to be "of a technical nature and have already been fully transposed into national law by all Member States".
Ti elementi so predmet politične presoje zakonodajnega organa in o njih ne morejo vnaprej soditi Komisija ali pravne službe institucij.
In fact, these elements are subject to a political appreciation by the legislative authority, which cannot be prejudged by the Commission or the Legal Services of the institutions.
Vendar je v okviru prenovitve obseg bistvenih sprememb predloga Komisije s strani zakonodajalca omejen na dele, ki so v predlogu opredeljeni kot bistvene spremembe, za razliko od nespremenjenih določb, v katerih so sicer mogoče zgolj formalne ali redakcijske spremembe , ne pa tudi bistvene spremembe.
However, in the context of a recast, the scope for substantive changes by the legislator to the Commission proposal is limited to those parts which are identified in the proposal as substantive amendments, as opposed to unchanged provisions which, although they may be affected by purely formal or editorial changes , have not undergone any substantive amendment.
Predpogoj za to je, da je mogoče razločevati med bistvenimi spremembami in nespremenjenimi določbami, kar zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlogov ne bo mogoče, če Komisija predlaga, da se direktiva spremeni v uredbo.
This presupposes that it is possible to distinguish between sub­stantive amendments and unchanged provisions, which, for the reasons set out above, is not the case if the Commission proposes to transform a directive into a regulation.
Zato je pravna služba Sveta mnenja, da ta predlog ne sodi na področje uporabe medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 28. novembra 2001
The Council Legal Service therefore is of the opinion that the present proposal falls outside the scope of the Inter­institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001
To mnenje ni v nasprotju z dvema prej navedenima mnenjema pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije, ki po mnenju pravne službe Sveta v zadevnem primeru nista relevantna.
This position is not contradicted by the two precedents quoted by the Legal Services of the European Parliament and of the Commission which, in the view of the Council Legal Service, are not relevant for the present case.
Predlog KOM(2003)0644 (Uredba o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH), o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije ter spremembi Direktive 1999/45/ES in Uredbe (ES) o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih) je bil nov zakonodajni predlog.
The proposal COM(2003) 644 (Regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restrictions of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency and amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) on Persistent Organic Pollutants) was a new legislative proposal.
Namen predloga KOM(2007)0265 (Uredba o skupnih pravilih za dostop do trga mednarodnega cestnega prevoza blaga) je bila prenovitev osnovne Uredbe (EGS) 881/92 z Uredbo (EGS) 3118/93 in Direktivo 2006/94/ES.
The proposal COM(2007) 265 (Regulation on common rules for access to the international road haulage market) was seeking to recast the basic Regulation (EEC) 881/92 with Regulation (EEC) 3118/93 and Directive 2006/94/EC.
Slednja zadeva zelo malo določb iz prenovljenega akta, predlog prenovitve pa ni spremenil pravnega instrumenta osnovnega akta.
The latter concerns very few provisions of the recast act, and the recast proposal did not change the legal instrument of the basic act.
Kozmetični izdelki (preoblikovano)
Cosmetic products (recast version)
o SRP in ekosistemskem pristopu k upravljanju ribištva
on the CFP and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management
- ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem pravu z dne 10. decembra 1982,
– having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982,
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy (CFP)
- ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za kmetijstvo in ribištvo z dne 29. in 30. septembra 2008 o zgoraj omenjenem sporočilu Komisije,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Agriculture and Fisheries Council of 29 and 30 September 2008 on the above Commission communication,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6–0485/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0485/2008 ),
A. ker so na vsakem geografskem območju vsi živi organizmi (ljudje, rastline, živali in mikroorganizmi), njihova fizična okolica (na primer prst, voda, zrak) in naravni cikli, ki jih vzdržujejo, medsebojno povezani,
A. whereas in any geographical area all living organisms (people, plants, animals and micro-organisms), their physical surroundings (such as soil, water, air) and the natural cycles that sustain them, are all interconnected,
B. ker imajo dogodki, medsebojni vplivi in spremembe v takšnih ekosistemih neposredne in pogosto neželene ali nepredvidene posledice za druge elemente znotraj in zunaj sistema in ker lahko dogodki zunaj tega sistema neposredno vplivajo nanj;
B. whereas developments, interactions and changes within such ecosystems have direct and often unwanted or unforeseen effects on other elements both inside and outside the system and whereas, likewise, developments occurring outside the system can have an immediate impact on the system,
C. ker je ekosistemski pristop k ribištvu zaenkrat najboljša podlaga za globalen sistem upravljanja in odločanja, ki upošteva vse zadevne zainteresirane strani in vse dejavnike, njihove zahteve in potrebe ter prihodnje medsebojne vplive med sistemom in zunanjimi dejavniki,
C. whereas an ecosystem approach to fisheries currently provides the best basis for a global management and decision-making system which takes into account all of the stakeholders and elements concerned, their requirements and needs, as well as future effects on the system and its interactions,
D. ker je ribolov v vodah izključne ekonomske cone (IEC) vsake države članice pomemben za njeno suverenost in neodvisnost, zlasti glede hrane,
D. whereas fishing in the waters of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of each Member State is important for its sovereignty and independence, particularly in terms of food,
E. ker je naše poznavanje oceanov in dejavnikov, ki vplivajo nanje, še vedno omejeno, a vseeno zadostuje, da vemo, da so mnogi komercialni in nekomercialni staleži rib v EU in drugod osiromašeni ter da je kljub odvisnosti staležev od številnih dejavnikov glavni razlog za to prekomeren ribolov,
E. whereas our knowledge of the oceans and the factors that influence them is still limited, but is nonetheless sufficient for us to know that many fish stocks, both commercial and non-commercial, are depleted in the EU and elsewhere, and that while this is due to many factors, in most cases the principal cause is over-fishing,
F. ker znanstvene raziskave o trajnosti ribolovnih virov predpostavljajo zavrnitev vsakršnih predpostavk, ki slonijo na vnaprej oblikovanih idejah, in bo posledično predlog za ekosistemsko analizo ocene ribolovnih virov dejansko ekosistemski le, če bo temeljil na potrjenih znanstvenih podatkih,
F. whereas scientific research on the sustainability of fishery resources presupposes the rejection of any assumptions based on preconceived ideas and, consequently, the proposal for an ecosystem-based analysis of the assessment of fishery resources will be truly ecosystem-based only if it is founded on validated scientific data,
G. ker morajo biti procesi informiranja in odločanja takšnega ekosistemskega pristopa dinamični in prilagodljivi, saj ga je treba zaradi novih znanstvenih spoznanj in novih medsebojnih vplivov nenehno prilagajati;
G. whereas such an ecosystem approach has to be dynamic and flexible in its information and decision-making processes, given the need for constant adaptation owing to the emergence of new scientific knowledge and new interrelations,
H. ker so na podlagi sporočila Komisije ( KOM(2008)0670 ) hude in zaskrbljujoče kršitve pravil SRP kljub prizadevanjem za zmanjšanje moči flote Skupnosti še naprej pogoste,
H. whereas, according to the Commission communication COM(2008)0670 , serious and worrying violations of the CFP rules remain frequent, despite attempts to reduce the strength of the Community fleet,
I. ker gre pri oceni ribolovnih virov za trajnost staležev in ker je to bistveno za ribolovno dejavnost, zagotavljanje te trajnosti pa je prepuščeno državam članicam,
I. whereas the assessment of fishery resources is concerned with the sustainability of stocks, and whereas this is fundamental for fishing activity, and safeguarding this sustainability is a matter for the Member States,
J. ker je glavni cilj ribiške politike, ki so ga sprejele vse države udeleženke svetovnega vrha za trajnostni razvoj v Johannesburgu leta 2002, največji trajnostni ulov,
J. whereas the main objective of fisheries policy, accepted by all the States participating in the World Summit for Sustainable Development held in Johannesburg in 2002, is to obtain maximum sustainable catches,
K. ker so vzroki za močan upad dohodka v ribiški industriji osiromašenje mnogih staležev rib s komercialno vrednostjo, zaradi česar je bilo treba uvesti omejitve ribiške dejavnosti, in stagnacija/upadanje cen prve prodaje skupaj z eksponentnim naraščanjem stroškov proizvodnje (dizelsko gorivo in motorni bencin); ta položaj je še slabši v državah, kjer so ti stroški še višji, zlasti ker ni na voljo ukrepov za podporo sektorju ali pa so ti nezadostni v primerjavi z ukrepi, ki so jih sprejele druge države,
K. whereas the sharp decline in income in the fishing industry is due to the depletion of many fish stocks of commercial value, which has made it necessary to impose restrictions on fishing activity, and to the stagnation/fall in prices at first sale, accompanied by the exponential increase in factors of production (diesel and petrol), a situation which is still worse in countries where these costs are higher, in particular owing to the absence or inadequacy of measures to support the industry by comparison with those adopted by other countries,
L. ker Komisija predlaga, da se prične razprava o morebitni reformi SRP,
L. whereas the Commission has proposed that a debate be launched on a possible reform of the CFP,
5. opozarja na ključni pomen ribiškega sektorja v nekaterih obalnih skupnostih EU z gospodarskega, družbenega in kulturnega vidika;
Draws attention to the key importance of the fisheries sector in some coastal communities of the EU from the economic, social and cultural points of view;
8. poudarja, da se SRP, ob upoštevanju svojih ciljev, ne sme podrejati drugim politikam Skupnosti, ki so že bile določene; nasprotno meni, da morajo te politike ščititi in vključevati cilje ribiške politike;
Stresses that, taking account of its own objectives, a CFP must not be subordinate to other Community policies that have since been defined; considers, on the contrary, that these latter policies must safeguard and integrate the objectives of fisheries policy;
13. poudarja, da izvajanje ekosistemskega pristopa k upravljanju morij nujno uvaja multidicsiplinarno in medresorsko dejavnost, ki vključuje različne ukrepe in politike, ki vplivajo na morski ekosistem – kar presega politike na področju ribištva –, brez katerih ne bo mogoče doseči ciljev tega pristopa;
Points out that the application of an ecosystem approach to marine management necessarily imposes a multidisciplinary and intersectoral action encompassing the various measures and policies that have an impact on marine ecosystems - going far beyond and upstream of policies adopted in the area of fisheries - without which it will not be possible to achieve the objectives of this approach;
Direktiva 2008/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju politike morskega okolja (Okvirna direktiva o morski strategiji) (UL L 164, 25.6.2008, str.
Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) (OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p.
20. predlaga, naj se izvedejo znanstvene študije, s katerimi bo mogoče ugotoviti prerazporeditve morskih vrst, ki jih izkorišča ribištvo, zaradi vpliva nedavnih sprememb fizikalnih in kemičnih lastnosti vode, ki so posledica podnebnih sprememb; meni, da morajo biti te študije podlaga za preoblikovanje številnih obstoječih načrtov za obnovitev staležev, na primer načrta za obnovitev južnega osliča in norveškega jastoga ob Iberskem polotoku;
Proposes that scientific studies be carried out capable of identifying the redistribution of marine species exploited by fisheries because of the impact of the recent change in the physical and chemical parameters of waters due to climatic change; considers that these studies should serve as a basis for reformulating a number of existing stock recovery plans, for example the recovery plan for southern hake and Norway lobster off the Iberian Peninsula;
26. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči in predlaga bolj odprte sisteme kontrole in nadzora glede iztovora rib, nezakonitega ulova in odmetavanja prilova v morje;
Urges the Commission to study and propose more open control and supervision systems in respect of fisheries landings, illegal catches and the discarding at sea of by-catches;
29. poudarja, da porazdelitev celotnega dovoljenega ulova po flotah in ribolovnih orodjih, ob spoštovanju načela relativne stabilnosti, sodi v izključno pristojnost vsake države članice; meni, da bi porazdelitev kvot v vsaki državi članici morala upoštevati vrsto orodja (vlečne mreže in drugo) in njihov ulov;
Stresses that the distribution of TACs by fleets and fishing gear, respecting the principle of relative stability, falls within the exclusive competence of each Member State; considers that the distribution of quotas in each Member State should take account of the type of gear (trawl and others) and the respective catches;
34. poziva, da se območje, ki ustreza izključnim ekonomskim conam najbolj oddaljenih regij, vselej obravnava kot „cona izključnega dostopa“, da se zagotovi trajnost morskega ekosistema, ribolovne dejavnosti in lokalnih ribiških skupnosti.
Calls for the area corresponding to the EEZs of the outermost regions to be considered an 'exclusive access zone' on a permanent basis in order to guarantee the sustainability of marine ecosystems, fishing activity and local fishing communities;
40. zato meni, da je znanstvena ocena, ki bo pokazala, ali je kaj prevelikih flot in preveč izkoriščanih virov, ter kateri so, ena prvih nalog, ki jih je treba opraviti na področju upravljanja ribištva, da se lahko sprejmejo ustrezni specifični ukrepi;
Considers, therefore, that one of the first tasks to be carried out in the area of fisheries management is to assess scientifically whether there are any over-large fleets and over-exploited resources, and which they are, so that suitable specific measures can be adopted;
45. poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga takšne ukrepe, da bodo za uvožene ribiške proizvode v prometu na notranjem trgu veljale enake zahteve kot za ribiške proizvode različnih držav članic;
Urges the Commission to propose measures making imported fishery products placed on the internal market subject to the same requirements as those applying to fishery products in the various Member States;
48. poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja okolju bolj prijazne ribiške prakse z uporabo bolj selektivnih tehnik ribolova, s katerimi je mogoče zmanjšati prilov in porabo goriva med ribolovnim obdobjem;
Urges the Commission to promote more environmentally sound fishing practices through the use of more selective fishing techniques which are able to reduce by-catches and fuel consumption during fishing periods;
52. poudarja, da je treba v okviru regionalne politike in dobre sosedske politike okrepiti sodelovanje s flotami, ki niso iz Skupnosti in izkoriščajo skupne staleže, da se zagotovi obstoj takšnih staležev;
Stresses that, within the framework of regional policy and good neighbourhood policy, cooperation with non-Community fleets exploiting shared stocks should be increased so as to ensure the viability of such stocks;
Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom Vloga SRP pri izvajanju ekosistemskega pristopa k upravljanju morij je ena od številnih pobud, za katero se zavzema Komisija, da bi sprožila razpravo o morebitnih reformah skupne ribiške politike do leta 2012.
The Commission communication on ‘The role of the CFP in implementing an ecosystem approach to marine management’ is one of a series of initiatives that the Commission is promoting in order to launch the debate on a possible reform of the common fisheries policy by 2012.
Glede na raznolik in zapleten obseg vprašanj, ki jih zastavlja Komisija, poročevalec meni, da je pomembno poudariti nekatere ključne elemente.
Regarding the diverse and complex range of questions raised by the Commission, the rapporteur considers it important to stress certain key elements.
Ribolov je temeljna dejavnost za zagotavljanje hrane ljudem in njihovega preživetja, kar je tudi prvotni cilj vseh ribiških politik.
Fishing is a fundamental activity for guaranteeing human beings’ food and survival, and this is the primordial objective of any fisheries policy.
V zvezi s tem je pomembno poudariti pomen ribolova v vodah izključne ekonomske cone (IEC) vsake države članice za njihovo suverenost in neodvisnost, zlasti glede hrane.
In this context, it is worth underlining the importance of fishing in the waters of each Member State’s EEZ for its sovereignty and independence, particularly in terms of food.
Ribiška politika mora dati prednost ulovu ribolovnih virov, ne da bi se pozabilo na proizvodne in prodajne dejavnosti ter nepogrešljive znanstvene raziskave, zlasti na oceno in prognozo ulova in biomase ribolovnih virov.
A fisheries policy must give priority to catches of fishery resources, without forgetting activities upstream and downstream and the indispensable scientific research, in particular the assessment and forecasts of catches and fishery resource biomass.
Z drugimi besedami, ribiška politika ni in ne sme biti politika za oceane ali za morsko okolje.
In other words, a fisheries policy is not and cannot be a policy for the oceans or for the marine environment.
Morska politika mora dajati prednost morjem, medtem ko jo mora ribiška politika dajati prednost ribolovu.
Maritime policy must give priority to the seas in the same way as fishing has priority in a fisheries policy.
Poleg tega bo treba vedno namesto ugibanj, ki temeljijo na vnaprej oblikovanih idejah, da ribištvo povzroča netrajnost sistemov, upoštevati znanstvene rezultate.
Moreover, consideration will always need to be given to scientific results, rather than hunches based on preconceived ideas that fishing is the cause of the unsustainability of systems.
Kar pomeni, da bo predlog za ekosistemsko analizo za oceno ribolovnih virov sprejemljiv le, če bo temeljil na potrjenih znanstvenih podatkih o trajnosti staležev in če bo upošteval različne dejavnike zunaj ribištva, ki vplivajo na ekosistem.
This means that the proposal for an ecosystem-based analysis of the assessment of fishery resources will be acceptable if it is based on validated scientific data on the sustainability of stocks, as well as taking account of the various factors external to fisheries that have an influence on the ecosystem.
Treba je ponovno poudariti, da mora SRP spodbujati posodobitev in trajnostni razvoj ribiške industrije, zagotavljati njen družbeno-gospodarski obstoj in trajnost virov, preskrbo prebivalstva z ribami ter suverenost in varnost glede hrane, ohranitev delovnih mest in boljše življenjske pogoje ribičev;
It needs to be reaffirmed that the CFP should promote the modernisation and sustainable development of the fishing industry, safeguarding its socio-economic viability and the sustainability of resources and guaranteeing the supply of fish to the public and food sovereignty and security, the preservation of jobs and improved living conditions for fishermen.
Treba je tudi upoštevati, da močan upad dohodka v industriji izhaja iz omejitev ribolovne dejavnosti in stagnacije/znižanja cen prve prodaje z eksponentnim naraščanjem proizvodnih stroškov (dizelsko gorivo in motorni bencin).
It must also be borne in mind that the sharp decline in income in the industry stems from restrictions on fishing activity and the stagnation/fall in first-sale prices, accompanied by the exponential increase in production costs (diesel and petrol).
Ribiška politika predpostavlja, da je upoštevanih več razsežnosti – socialna, okoljska in gospodarska – kar zahteva celosten in uravnotežen pristop, za katerega ne velja nadrejenost zlasti z vnaprejšnjim določanjem hierarhije prednostnih nalog.
Fisheries policy presupposes that account is taken of a multitude of dimensions – social, environmental and economic – which requires an integrated and balanced approach that is incompatible with a superimposed vision, in particular through the a priori definition of any hierarchy of priorities.
To pomeni, da se ji ni treba podrejati drugim politikam Skupnosti, medtem ko morajo te politike ščititi in vključevati cilje ribiške politike.
This means that it must not be subordinate to other Community policies and that, on the contrary, these other policies must safeguard and integrate the objectives of fisheries policy.
Politika za ribištvo mora izhajati iz predpostavke, da sta blaginja ribiških skupnosti in trajnost ekosistema, katerega sestavni del so, soodvisni, zlasti s prepoznavanjem posebnosti in pomena obalnega ribolova malega obsega in obrtnega ribolova.
A policy for fisheries must start from the assumption of an interdependence between the welfare of fishing communities and the sustainability of ecosystems, of which they are an integral part, in particular by recognising the specific features and importance of small-scale inshore fishing and artisanal fishing.