natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Sonia Alfano, Roberta Angelilli, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Louis Michel, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Carmen Romero López, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Renate Sommer, Wim van de Camp, Axel Voss, Manfred Weber, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Sonia Alfano, Roberta Angelilli, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Louis Michel, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Georgios Papanikolaou, Carmen Romero López, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Renate Sommer, Wim van de Camp, Axel Voss, Manfred Weber, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Anne Delvaux, Ioan Enciu, Evelyne Gebhardt, Ana Gomes, Stanimir Ilčev (Stanimir Ilchev), Ádám Kósa, Petru Constantin Luhan, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Cecilia Wikström
Edit Bauer, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Anne Delvaux, Ioan Enciu, Evelyne Gebhardt, Ana Gomes, Stanimir Ilchev, Ádám Kósa, Petru Constantin Luhan, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Cecilia Wikström
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation
Med glavnimi cilji EU je ohranjevati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, na katerem je zagotovljeno prosto gibanje oseb.
One of the EU’s main objectives is to maintain and develop an area of freedom, security and justice, in which freedom of movement of persons is guaranteed.
Pravne razmere na evropski ravni na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti zakoncev z različnim državljanstvom trenutno povzročajo veliko zmedo.
The legal situation at European level regarding the law applicable to the divorce and legal separation of spouses of different nationalities is currently very confusing.
To pogosto vodi zakonca k hitenju na sodišče, ko eden od njiju vloži tožbo za razvezo pred drugim, s čimer zagotovi, da postopek poteka v skladu s tistim pravom, ki je po njegovem mnenju ugodnejši zanj.
This often leads to a ‘rush to court’ where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she regards as more favourable to his or her own interests.
Cilj predloga uredbe je zagotoviti pravno varnost, pa tudi predvidljivost in prožnost za te zakonske pare.
The purpose of the proposal for a regulation is to create legal certainty for the couples concerned and guarantee predictability and flexibility.
Ker je družinsko pravo še zlasti občutljivo področne nacionalne zakonodaje, v predlogu uredbe Komisija ne zagovarja usklajevanje prava, ki ureja razveze, in še manj družinskega prava, ampak predlaga skupni sveženj pravil za določanje prava države, ki naj se uporablja v primeru zakoncev z različnim državljanstvom.
Given that family law is a particularly sensitive area of national legislation, the Commission’s proposal for a regulation does not advocate any harmonisation of divorce law, let alone of family law, but puts forward a common set of rules for determining which country’s law should apply in the event of a divorce between spouses of different nationalities.
Trenutno je v EU vsako leto sklenjeno približno 300,000 zakonov med partnerji z različnim državljanstvom, kar pomeni, da je skupno 16 milijonov mednarodnih zakonskih zvez.
At present, some 300 000 marriages take place each year between partners of different nationalities in the EU, bringing the total number of international marriages to 16 million.
Vsako leto se v EU razdre 140.000–170.000 tisoč takih zvez.
Of these marriages, in the EU as a whole, 140 000 - 170 000 per year end in divorce.
Te številke in zelo različno materialno pravo za razvezo, ki velja v Evropski uniji, kažejo, da je nujno zagotoviti večjo pravno varnost v primeru razveze ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti.
These figures, together with the widely divergent substantive rules of divorce law which exist in the EU as a whole, make clear the urgency of creating greater legal certainty in the event of divorce or separation.
Evropska komisija zato predlaga, da se poveča avtonomija strank pri razvezi in prenehanju življenjske skupnosti in da se udeleženima stranema v določenem obsegu ponudi možnost, da sama določita pravo, ki bo uporabljeno v njunem primeru.
The Commission therefore proposes to enhance the parties’ autonomy in the event of divorce and legal separation by giving them the option, within a given framework, to choose the law applicable to their divorce or legal separation.
Pri tem morata imeti zakonca možnost izbire prava tiste države, s katero sta na poseben način povezana.
Within this framework the spouses should have the right to opt for the law of a country with which they have particular links.
Izbrano pravo mora biti združljivo s skupnimi vrednotami Evropske unije.
The law chosen must be one which is compatible with the common values of the European Union.
Stališče pripravljavke mnenja
Rapporteur’s view
Pripravljavka mnenja načeloma podpira vsebino predloga uredbe o pravu, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti.
The rapporteur for the opinion supports in principle the substance of the rules for determining the law applicable to divorce and legal separation.
Namen predlogov spremembe v tem mnenju je prilagoditi predlog Komisije tako, da se jasno izključi diskriminacija na podlagi spola, zagotovi enake možnosti za oba zakonca in postavi v ospredje koristi otroka.
The amendments in this opinion seek to adjust the Commission proposal so as to clearly rule out any discrimination on the grounds of gender, guarantee equal opportunities for both spouses and give central priority to the welfare of the children.
Na koncu pa pripravljavka mnenja zagovarja mnenje, da se ne bi smeli ustaviti pri enotni evropski ureditvi prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, temveč da bi bilo treba v naslednjem koraku sprejeti ustrezna pravila v zvezi s posledicami razveze (premoženjska upravičenja, preživnina, usklajevanje pravic iz pokojninskega zavarovanja).
Finally, however, the rapporteur takes the view that a uniform pan-European system of rules governing the applicable law in the event of divorce and legal separation ought not to be the last word, but that in a second stage rules ought also to be adopted to cover the consequences of divorce (property rights, maintenance, apportionment of pension rights).
Določbe v predlogu uredbe posledic razveze ne obravnavajo.
The rules in the proposed regulation do not cover the consequences of divorce.
Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
(2a) V skladu s členom 8 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, si Evropska unija pri vseh svojih dejavnostih prizadeva odpraviti neenakosti ter spodbujati enakost med moškimi in ženskami.
(2a) Pursuant to Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in all its activities the Union is to aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between men and women.
Pri potrditvi izbire prava je treba vsakega zakonca posamezno poučiti o pravnih posledicah, ki sledijo izbiri prava, ki se uporablja.
When the choice-of-law agreement is authenticated, each of the spouses should be individually informed of the legal consequences of the choice of applicable law.
Pri tem je treba ustrezno uporabiti nacionalne predpise, ki lahko zakoncema zagotovijo pravno pomoč.
National provisions whereby spouses may be granted legal aid should be applied accordingly.
Dogovor o izbiri prava, ki se uporablja, mora biti sklenjen v pisni obliki z navedbo datuma in podpisom obeh strank ter notarsko overjen .
The agreement on the choice of applicable law should be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both parties and authenticated by a notary .
(20) Kadar pravo, ki se uporablja, bodisi ne predvideva razveze ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti bodisi enemu od zakoncev zaradi spola ne zagotavlja enakih možnosti in obravnave v zvezi z razvezo ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, bi se moralo vseeno uporabljati pravo sodišča, ki bi začelo postopek.
(20) Where the applicable law makes no provision for divorce or for legal separation or where it does not grant one of the spouses equal access and ensure equal treatment relating to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex, the law of the court seised should nevertheless apply.
Zaradi varstva temeljnih pravic žensk in moških je treba med postopkom razveze ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti zagotoviti enake možnosti in obravnavo.
To protect the fundamental rights of both women and men, equal access and equal treatment must be guaranteed during divorce or legal separation.
(20a) Države članice bi morale razmisliti o možnosti, da bi se določbe te uredbe uporabljale za prenehanje registrirane partnerske skupnosti v primeru medsebojno nasprotujočih si kolizijskih norm, in sicer vse dokler ne bi imeli posebnih ureditev za take primere, ob upoštevanju različnih pravnih sistemov držav članic.
(20a) Member States should consider the possibility of applying the provisions of this Regulation to the separation of couples in registered partnerships in the event of divergent rules on the conflict of laws until such time as specific rules for such cases exist, taking into account the different legal systems in the Member States.
S tem se bi ustvarila pravna obveznost priznavanja registrirane partnerske skupnosti.
This would not create a legal obligation to recognise registered partnerships.
Področje uporabe uredbe je omejeno na razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, ne pa na prenehanje registrirane partnerske skupnosti.
The scope of the regulation is confined to divorces and legal separations between married couples and does not extend to the termination of registered partnerships.
Da bi preprečili diskriminacijo drugih registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, bi bilo treba to področje razširiti.
This scope should be broadened to prevent discrimination against other registered life partnerships.
(21) Zaradi upoštevanja javnega interesa bi morala imeti sodišča udeleženih držav članic možnost, da v izjemnih okoliščinah zavrnejo tuje pravo, kadar bi bila njegova uporaba v določenem primeru očitno v nasprotju z javnim redom države, v kateri je sodišče, pred katerim se začne postopek.
(21) Considerations of public interest should allow courts in the Member States the opportunity in exceptional circumstances to disregard the application of foreign law in a given case where it would be manifestly contrary to the public policy of the forum.
Vendar sodišča ne bi smela imeti možnosti uporabe izjeme javnega reda, da bi zavrnila pravo druge države članice, kadar bi bilo to v nasprotju z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti s členom 21 Listine, ki prepoveduje vsakršno diskriminacijo in členom 23, ki zagotavlja enakost med ženskami in moškimi na vseh področjih .
However, the courts should not be able to apply the public-policy exception in order to disregard the law of another Member State when to do so would be contrary to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 21 thereof, which prohibits all forms of discrimination , and Article 23 thereof, which requires equality between men and women to be ensured in all areas .
Zaradi varstva temeljnih pravic evropskih državljanov je treba omejiti izjeme javnega reda.
In order to respect the fundamental rights of European citizens, it is important to limit the public-policy exception.
Ta uredba se uporablja v primerih, ki vsebujejo kolizijska pravila pri razvezi , prenehanju življenjske skupnosti in razveljavitvi zakonske zveze .
This Regulation shall apply in situations involving a conflict of laws, to divorce , legal separation and annulment of marriage .
V določenih situacijah je za žensko pomembno, da še ni razvezana.
There are certain situations where it is important for the woman that she is not yet divorced.
Zato je razširitev področja uporabe dobrodošla.
A broadening of the scope would therefore be welcome.
(Drugi stavek ne zadeva slovenske različice).
(The next sentence does not apply to the English text).
Dogovor iz odstavka 2 se sklene v pisni obliki, zakonca pa ga morata opremiti z datumom in podpisom ter notarsko overiti .
The agreement referred to in paragraph 2 shall be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both spouses and authenticated by a notary .
Kadar pravo, ki se uporablja v skladu s členoma 3 in 4, bodisi ne predvideva razveze bodisi enemu od zakoncev zaradi spola ne daje enakih možnosti za razvezo ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, se uporablja pravo sodišča, pred katerim se začne postopek.
Where the law applicable pursuant to Article 3 or Article 4 makes no provision for divorce or does not grant one of the spouses equal access to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex, the lex fori shall apply.
Kadar pravo, ki se uporabi v skladu s členoma 3 ali 4, bodisi ne predvideva razveze ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti bodisi enemu od zakoncev zaradi spola ne zagotavlja enakih možnosti in obravnave v zvezi z razvezo ali prenehanjem življenjske skupnosti, se uporabi domače pravo zadevnega sodišča.
Where the law applicable pursuant to Article 3 or Article 4 makes no provision for divorce or for legal separation or does not grant one of the spouses equal access or ensure equal treatment relating to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex, the lex fori shall apply.
Uporaba pravne določbe v skladu s to uredbo, se lahko zavrne le, če je takšna uporaba očitno nezdružljiva z javnim redom države, v kateri je sodišče, pred katerim se začne postopek.
Application of a provision of the law designated by virtue of this Regulation may be refused only if such application is manifestly incompatible with the public policy of the forum.
Vendar sodišča ne bi smela imeti možnosti uporabe izjeme javnega reda, da bi zavrnila pravo druge države članice, kadar bi bilo to v nasprotju z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti s členom 21 Listine, ki prepoveduje vsakršno diskriminacijo, in členom 23, ki zagotavlja enakost med ženskami in moškimi na vseh področjih.
However, the courts should not be able to apply the public-policy exception in order to disregard the law of another Member State when to do so would be contrary to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 21 thereof, which prohibits all forms of discrimination, and Article 23 thereof, which requires equality between men and women to be ensured in all areas.
Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Edite Estrela, Ilda Figueiredo, Iratxe García Pérez, Lívia Járóka, Philippe Juvin, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Astrid Lulling, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Nicole Sinclaire, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Eva-Britt Svensson, Marc Tarabella, Britta Thomsen, Anna Záborská
Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Edite Estrela, Ilda Figueiredo, Iratxe García Pérez, Lívia Járóka, Philippe Juvin, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Astrid Lulling, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Nicole Sinclaire, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Eva-Britt Svensson, Marc Tarabella, Britta Thomsen, Anna Záborská
Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Sirpa Pietikäinen
Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Sirpa Pietikäinen
Raffaele Baldassarre, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Marielle Gallo, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Evelyn Regner, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov), Alexandra Thein, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Raffaele Baldassarre, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Marielle Gallo, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Evelyn Regner, Dimitar Stoyanov, Alexandra Thein, Tadeusz Zwiefka
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Ekonomsko in monetarno unijo Zahodne Afrike o nekaterih vidikih zračnega prometa
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the West African Economic and Monetary Union on certain aspects of air services
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (06646/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (06646/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Ekonomsko in monetarno unijo Zahodne Afrike o nekaterih vidikih zračnega prometa (06190/2009),
– having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Community and the West African Economic and Monetary Union on certain aspects of air services (06190/2009),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za odobritev v skladu s členom 100(2) in prvim pododstavkom člena 218(8) ter točke (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0103/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2), Article 218(8), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0103/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7‑0361/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7‑0361/2010 )
Tako je Komisija po pogajanjih dosegla sporazum z Ekonomsko in monetarno unijo Zahodne Afrike, ki nadomešča nekatere določbe obstoječih 47 dvostranskih sporazumov, sklenjenih med državami članicami EU in državami članicami Ekonomske in monetarne unije Zahodne Afrike.
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with the West African Economic and Monetary Union that replaces certain provisions in the existing 47 bilateral air services agreements concluded between EU Member States and Member States of the West African Economic and Monetary Union.
Glavni vidiki sporazuma
Main aspects of the Agreement:
Člen 2 (klavzula o določitvi): Da se prepreči diskriminacija med letalskimi prevozniki EU, se običajne klavzule o določitvi, ki veljajo za letalske prevoznike države članice, ki je pogodbenica dvostranskega sporazuma, nadomestijo s klavzulo EU, ki velja za vse letalske prevoznike EU.
Article 2 (designation clause): To avoid discrimination between EU air carriers, the traditional designation clauses, referring to air carriers of the Member State party to the bilateral agreement, are replaced by a EU designation clause, referring to all EU carriers.
Člen 5 (obdavčitev letalskega goriva): Običajni dvostranski sporazumi načeloma letalsko gorivo izvzemajo iz obdavčenja, direktiva Sveta 2003/96/ES, ki spreminja okvir Skupnosti na področju obdavčevanja energentov in električne energije, pa takšno obdavčenje na ozemlju Evropske unije dovoljuje.
Article 5 (taxation of aviation fuel): Whereas traditional bilateral agreements tend to exempt aircraft fuel in general from taxation, Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity permits such taxation for operations within the territory of the European union.
S členom 6 se določbe iz dvostranski sporazumov, ki so očitno protikonkurenčne (obvezni trgovinski dogovori med letalskimi prevozniki), uskladijo s konkurenčnim pravom EU.
Article 6 brings provisions in bilateral agreements which are clearly anti-competitive (obligatory commercial agreements between airlines) in line with EU competition law.
Prilogi 1 in 2 vsebujeta seznam dvostranskih sporazumov in njihovih členov, ki so navedeni v členih 1 do 7 predlaganega sporazuma.
Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements and their articles which are referred to in Articles 1 to 7 of the proposed Agreement.
Sporazum, ki ga je v pogajanjih dosegla Komisija, je bil podpisan 30. novembra 2009 in se je odtlej začasno uporabljal.
The Agreement negotiated by the Commission was signed on 30 November 2009 and has been provisionally applied.
Parlament ima v skladu s členom 81 poslovnika pravico dati odobritev k sklenitvi tega sporazuma.
Parliament is entitled to give its consent to the conclusion of this Agreement, in accordance with Rule 81 of the Rules of Procedure.
Parlament sprejme sklep z enim samim glasovanjem, pri čemer ni mogoče vlagati predlogov sprememb sporazuma.
Parliament shall take a decision by means of a single vote, and no amendments to the agreement itself may be tabled."
Na podlagi navedenega poročevalec predlaga, da Odbor za promet in turizem poda pozitivno mnenje o sklenitvi tega sporazuma.
On the basis of the above-mentioned your rapporteur suggests that the TRAN committee should give a favourable opinion on the conclusion of this Agreement.
Zigmantas Balčytis, Philip Bradbourn, Spiros Danels (Spyros Danellis), Dominique Riquet, Anna Rosbach, Joachim Zeller, Janusz Władysław Zemke
Zigmantas Balčytis, Philip Bradbourn, Spyros Danellis, Dominique Riquet, Anna Rosbach, Joachim Zeller, Janusz Władysław Zemke
o osnutku sklepa Sveta in Komisije o sklenitvi Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskima skupnostma in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Srbijo na drugi strani
on the draft Council and Commission decision on the conclusion of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta in Komisije (15619/1/2007),
– having regard to the draft Council and Commission decision (15619/1/2007),
– ob upoštevanju stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskima skupnostma in Srbijo (16005/2007),
– having regard to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and Serbia (16005/2007),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 217, točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) in členom 218(8) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter drugim odstavkom člena 101 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo ( C7-0341/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) and (8), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and with Article 101, second paragraph, of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community ( C7‑0341/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7‑0362/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7‑0362/2010 ),