natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato ta predlog spremembe omogoča državam članicam, da sporočijo, katere obveznosti (poleg tistih iz odstavka 1) so pripravljene nadzorovati.
Therefore, this Amendment proposes to give a possibility for Member States to notify which obligations (apart from those listed in paragraph 1) they are ready to supervise.
V tem primeru lahko država izdaje samodejno določi te obveznosti brez stika z državo izvršitve.
In this case the issuing State automatically can impose those obligations without getting in touch with the executing State.
Vse obveznosti, ki jih naloži organ izdaje v skladu z odstavki 1, 2 in 3 tega člena, se evidentirajo v evropskem nalogu za nadzor.
Any obligations imposed by the issuing authority in accordance with paragraphs 1 , 2 and 3 of this Article shall be recorded in the European supervision order.
Vse obveznosti, ki jih naloži organ izdaje v skladu z odstavki 1 in 2 tega člena, se evidentirajo v evropskem nalogu za nadzor.
Any obligations imposed by the issuing authority in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall be recorded in the European supervision order.
Poleg obveznosti, določenih v evropskem nalogu za nadzor, organ izvršitve lahko v skladu z zakonodajo države izvršitve spremeni obveznosti, vsebovane v evropskem nalogu za nadzor, kolikor je to nujno potrebno za namen njegove izvršitve.
In addition to the obligations provided for in the European supervision order, the executing authority may, in accordance with the law of the executing State, modify the obligations contained in the European supervision order as is strictly necessary for the purpose of executing the European supervision order.
Organ izvršitve lahko v skladu z zakonodajo države izvršitve spremeni obveznosti, vsebovane v evropskem nalogu za nadzor, kolikor je to nujno potrebno za namen njegove izvršitve.
The executing authority may, in accordance with the law of the executing State, modify the obligations contained in the European supervision order as is strictly necessary for the purpose of executing the European supervision order.
Pojasniti je treba, da organ izvršitve ne more dodati nobenih obveznosti tistim, ki jih je določil organ izdaje.
It should be made clear that the executing authority cannot add any obligations to ones which are imposed by the issuing authority.
Organ izvršitve lahko opravi le tehnično prilagoditev evropskega naloga za nadzor.
The executing authority can make only technical adjustments to the ESO.
Člen 6, odstavek 4, pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 6, paragraph 4, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Spremembe iz pododstavka 1 so zgolj tehnične narave in ne določajo dodatnih obveznosti za osumljenca.
The modifications referred to in subparagraph 1 shall be of a technical nature only and shall not of themselves impose additional obligations on the suspect.
Na zahtevo osumljenca se evropski nalog za nadzor prenese v vsako drugo državo članico, katere pristojni organ soglaša s tem prenosom.
At the request of the suspect, the European supervision order shall be transmitted to any other Member State whose competent authority consents to such transmission.
Temeljno načelo predloga je, da mora imeti osumljenec možnost za vrnitev v svojo državo običajnega stalnega bivališča.
The basic principle of the proposal is that the suspect should be given opportunity to return to his/her country of ordinary residence.
Kadar pa ima osumljenec tesnejše stike s katero koli drugo državo članico (tj. državo svojega državljanstva), mora okvirni sklep zagotoviti možnost vrnitve v to državo.
However, in situations where the suspect has closer links with any other Member State (i.e. of his nationality), the Framework Decision should provide for an opportunity to go to that country.
Zadevna država članica mora zaradi preprečevanja zlorab s tem vseeno soglašati.
However, to avoid abuse of that, the Member State concerned should consent to that.
Sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec v zaprošeni državi zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor, če je razvidno, da bi kazenski postopek za dejanje, v zvezi s katerim je bil nalog izdan, kršil načelo ne bis in idem.
A court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor , in the requested State shall refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order if it is clear that criminal proceedings for the offence in respect of which that order has been issued would infringe the ne bis in idem principle.
Pristojni organ v zaprošeni državi zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor, če je razvidno, da bi kazenski postopek za dejanje, v zvezi s katerim je bil nalog izdan, kršil načelo ne bis in idem .
The competent authority in the requested State shall refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order if it is clear that criminal proceedings for the offence in respect of which that order has been issued would infringe the ne bis in idem principle.
Sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec v zaprošeni državi lahko zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor iz enega ali več naslednjih razlogov:
A court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor, in the requested State may refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order on one or more of the following grounds:
Pristojni organ v zaprošeni državi lahko zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor iz enega ali več naslednjih razlogov:
The competent authority in the requested State may refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order on one or more of the following grounds:
Sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec v zaprošeni državi čimprej in najpozneje v 5 dneh od prejetja evropskega naloga za nadzor odloči, ali nalog priznava in ali ga bo izvršil, ali pa se bo skliceval na razloge za nepriznanje in neizvršitev.
A court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor, in the requested State shall, as soon as possible and in any case within 5 days of receipt of the European supervision order, decide whether to recognise and execute it or to invoke grounds for non-recognition and non-execution.
Pristojni organ v zaprošeni državi obvesti organ izdaje o svoji odločitvi z uporabo kakršnega koli sredstva, ki omogoča izdelavo pisnega zapisa.
The competent authority in the requested State shall inform the issuing authority of that decision by any means capable of producing a written record.
Pristojni organ v zaprošeni državi čim prej in najpozneje v 5 dneh od prejetja evropskega naloga za nadzor odloči, ali nalog priznava in ali ga bo izvršil, ali pa se bo skliceval na razloge za nepriznanje in neizvršitev.
The competent authority in the requested State shall, as soon as possible and in any case within 5 days of receipt of the European supervision order, decide whether to recognise and execute it or to invoke grounds for non-recognition and non-execution.
Če je evropski nalog za nadzor nepopoln, lahko sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec v zaprošeni državi svojo odločitev o priznanju in izvršitvi naloga odloži, dokler organ izdaje naloga ne dopolni.
Where the European supervision order is incomplete, the court, the judge, the investigating magistrate or the public prosecutor in the requested State may postpone its decision on the recognition and execution of the order until it has been completed by the issuing authority.
Če je evropski nalog za nadzor nepopoln, lahko pristojni organ v zaprošeni državi svojo odločitev o priznanju in izvršitvi naloga odloži, dokler organ izdaje naloga ne dopolni.
Where the European supervision order is incomplete, the competent authority in the requested State may postpone its decision on the recognition and execution of the order until it has been completed by the issuing authority.
Če sta v skladu z odstavkom 3 priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor odložena, sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec v zaprošeni državi takoj pošlje poročilo s podrobnostmi o razlogih za odlog neposredno organu izdaje z uporabo kakršnega koli sredstva, ki omogoča izdelavo pisnega zapisa.
If, in accordance with paragraph 3, the recognition and execution of the European supervision order is postponed, the court, the judge, the investigating magistrate or the public prosecutor in the requested State shall forthwith communicate a report detailing the grounds for postponement directly to the issuing authority by any means capable of producing a written record.
Če sta v skladu z odstavkom 3 priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor odložena, pristojni organ v zaprošeni državi takoj pošlje poročilo s podrobnostmi o razlogih za odlog neposredno organu izdaje z uporabo kakršnega koli sredstva, ki omogoča izdelavo pisnega zapisa.
If, in accordance with paragraph 3, the recognition and execution of the European supervision order is postponed, the competent authority in the requested State shall forthwith communicate a report detailing the grounds for postponement directly to the issuing authority by any means capable of producing a written record.
Organ izdaje obvesti osumljenca o vsakem odlogu v zvezi s priznanjem in izvršitvijo evropskega naloga za nadzor.
The issuing authority shall inform the suspect of any postponement of the recognition and execution of the European supervision order.
Osumljenec ima pravico, da je obveščen o vsakem razvoju dogodkov v zvezi s sodnim postopkom.
The suspect shall have the right to be informed about any developments of his/her proceeding.
Osumljenec ima pravico do zaslišanja pred organom izdaje v skladu z zakonodajo države izdaje.
The suspect shall have the right to be heard by the issuing authority, in accordance with the law of the issuing State.
Tej zahtevi se lahko ugodi z uporabo ustreznih video ali telefonskih povezav z organom izdaje (zaslišanje prek video- ali telefonske konference).
This requirement may be satisfied through the use of appropriate video or telephone links with the issuing authority (hearing by video or telephone conference) .
Poleg tega se organ izdaje posvetuje z organom izvršitve o ponovni presoji evropskega naloga za nadzor.
The issuing authority shall also consult the executing authority on the review of the European supervision order.
To zahtevo se lahko izpolni v skladu s postopkom iz člena 10 Konvencije z dne 29. maja 2000 med organom izvršitve in organom izdaje.
This requirement may be met in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 10 of the Convention of 29 May 2000 between the executing and the issuing authority.
Predlog spremembe zagotavlja uporabo enotnega postopka video povezav.
To ensure that uniform procedure of video links is used.
Pred sprejetjem odločitve iz odstavka 1 ima osumljenec pravico do zaslišanja pred organom izdaje v skladu z zakonodajo države izdaje.
Before the decision under paragraph 1 is taken, the suspect shall have the right to be heard by the issuing authority, in accordance with the law of the issuing State.
Tej zahtevi se lahko ugodi z uporabo ustreznih video ali telefonskih povezav med organom izvršitve in organom izdaje (zaslišanje prek video- ali telefonske konference) .
This requirement may be satisfied through the use of appropriate video or telephone links between the executing and the issuing authority (hearing by video or telephone conference) .
Organ izdaje se tudi posvetuje z organom izvršitve.
The issuing authority shall also consult the executing authority.
Pogoji za aretacijo in privedbo osumljenca
Conditions for arrest and transfer of the suspect
Aretacija in privedba osumljenca
Arrest and transfer of the suspect
Če organ izdaje odloči, da se osumljenec aretira in privede v državo izdaje, osumljenca zasliši pravosodni organ države članice, na ozemlju katere je bil aretiran .
If the issuing authority decides that the suspect must be arrested and transferred to the issuing State, the suspect shall be heard by a judicial authority of the Member State on whose territory he is arrested.
Če organ izdaje odloči, da se osumljenec aretira in privede v državo izdaje, izda evropski nalog za prijetje v skladu z določbami okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ s 13. junija 2002.
If the issuing authority decides that the suspect must be arrested and transferred to the issuing State, it shall issue a European arrest warrant in accordance with the provisions of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002.
Če osumljenec privoli v svojo privedbo, država članica, na ozemlju katere je bil osumljenec aretiran, takoj privede osumljenca v državo izdaje.
If the suspect consents to his transfer the Member State on whose territory the suspect is arrested shall forthwith transfer him to the issuing State .
Ne glede na člen 2(1) okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ je mogoče v takih primerih izdati evropski nalog za prijetje in privesti osumljenca v državo izdajateljico v zvezi z vsemi kaznivimi dejanji, za katere je mogoče izdati evropski nalog za nadzor.
Notwithstanding Article 2 (1) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, a European arrest warrant may, in such a case, be issued and the suspect be transferred to the issuing State in connection with all the offences for which a European supervision order may be issued.
Če osumljenec ne privoli v svojo privedbo, država članica, na ozemlju katere je bil osumljenec aretiran, takoj privede osumljenca v državo izdaje.
If the suspect does not consent to his transfer the Member State on whose territory he is arrested shall forthwith transfer him to the issuing State.
Aretacijo in privedbo lahko zavrne samo
It may refuse the arrest and transfer only
- če je jasno, da bi kazenski postopek za dejanje, v zvezi s katerim je bil izdan nalog, prekršil načelo ne bis in idem;
- if it is clear that criminal proceedings for the offence in respect of which that order has been issued would meanwhile infringe the ne bis in idem principle;
- če je osumljenec preganjan v državi članici izvršitve zaradi dejstev, ki so ista kot dejstva, na katerih temelji evropski nalog za nadzor;
- if the suspect is being prosecuted in the executing Member State for the same facts as those on which the European supervision order is based;
- če sta kazenski pregon ali kaznovanje osumljenca zastarela v skladu z zakonodajo države članice izvršitve, dejanja pa spadajo pod sodno pristojnost navedene države članice v skladu z njenim kazenskim pravom;
- if the criminal prosecution or punishment of the suspect is statute-barred according to the law of the executing Member State and the acts fall within the jurisdiction of that Member State under its own criminal law;
- čer se odločitev o aretaciji in privedbi nanaša na nova dejstva, ki niso zajeta v evropskem nalogu za nadzor.
- if the decision to arrest and transfer concerns new facts not covered by the European supervision order.
Država članica, ki ni država izvršitve, lahko tudi zavrne aretacijo in privedbo osumljenca na podlagi enega ali več razlogov, določenih v členu 10.
A Member State other than the executing State may also refuse to arrest and transfer the suspect on the basis of one or more of the grounds set out in Article 10.
Člen 20Roki za privedbo
Article 20 Time limits for transfer
Osumljenec se privede v državo izdaje v skladu s členom 18 na datum, o katerem se zadevni državi članici dogovorita med seboj, najpozneje pa v 3 dneh po aretaciji.
The suspect shall be transferred to the issuing State pursuant to Article 18 on a date mutually agreed between member States concerned and in any event no later than 3 days following the arrest.
Privedba osumljenca se lahko izjemoma odloži zaradi resnih človekoljubnih razlogov, na primer če obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da bi lahko privedba občutno ogrozila življenje ali zdravje osumljenca.
The transfer of a suspect may exceptionally be temporarily postponed for serious humanitarian reasons, for example, if there are reasonable grounds for believing that transfer would manifestly endanger the suspect’s life or health.
Organ izdaje se nemudoma obvesti o tovrstnem odlogu in o razlogih zanj.
The issuing authority shall immediately be informed of any such postponement and of the reasons thereof.
Privedba osumljenca se opravi, takoj ko ti razlogi prenehajo obstajati, na datum, o katerem se med seboj dogovorita zadevni državi članici.
The transfer of the suspect shall take place as soon as these grounds have ceased to exist on a date agreed between the Member States concerned.
Zadevni člen urejajo določbe Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o evropskem nalogu za prijetje.
Shall be regulated by the provisions of the Council Framework Decision on the EAW.
Člen 21 Tranzit
Article 21 Transit
Vse države članice dovolijo čez svoje ozemlje tranzit osumljenca, ki je predmet privedbe, v skladu z določbami tega okvirnega sklepa, pod pogojem, da so bile obveščene o:
Each Member State shall permit the transit through its territory of a suspect who is being transferred pursuant to the provisions of this Framework Decision provided that it has been informed of:
(a) istovetnosti in državljanstvu osebe, ki je predmet evropskega naloga za nadzor;
(a) the identity and nationality of the person subject to the European supervision order;
(b) obstoju evropskega naloga za nadzor;
(b) the existence of a European supervision order;
(c) vrsto in pravno klasifikacijo kaznivega dejanja;
(c) the nature and legal classification of the offence;
(d) okoliščinah kaznivega dejanja, vključno z datumom in krajem.
(d) the circumstances of the offence, including the date and place.
Vsaka država članica imenuje organ, pristojen za sprejemanje zahtev za tranzit in potrebnih dokumentov kakor tudi kakršne koli druge uradne korespondence v zvezi z zahtevami za tranzit.
Each Member State shall designate an authority responsible for receiving transit requests and the necessary documents, as well as any other official correspondence relating to transit requests.
Države članice podatke o tem imenovanju sporočijo Svetu.
Member States shall communicate this designation to the Council.
Zahteva za tranzit in informacije, določene v odstavku 1, se lahko naslovijo na organ, imenovan v skladu z odstavkom 2, z uporabo kakršnega koli sredstva, ki omogoča izdelavo pisnega zapisa.
The transit request and the information provided for in paragraph 1 may be addressed to the authority designated pursuant to paragraph 2 by any means capable of producing a written record.
Država članica tranzita sporoči svojo odločitev z enakim postopkom.
The Member State of transit shall notify its decision by the same procedure.
Ta okvirni sklep se ne uporablja za zračni prevoz brez načrtovanega postanka.
This Framework Decision does not apply in the case of transport by air without a scheduled stopover.
Če pa pride do nenačrtovanega pristanka, država izdaje dostavi organu, imenovanemu v skladu z odstavkom 2, informacije, določene v odstavku 1.
However, if an unscheduled landing occurs, the issuing State shall provide the authority designated pursuant to paragraph 2 with the information provided for in paragraph 1.
Odstavek 1 velja tudi v primerih, kjer je bilo z evropskim nalogom o nadzoru v skladu s členom 6(2)(d) osumljencu prepovedano zapustiti kraj stalnega bivališča ali drug kraj za celotno obdobje, določeno v nalogu.
Paragraph 1 shall also apply where, for the purposes of Article 6(2)(d), the suspect has been forbidden under the European supervision order to leave his place of residence or any other dwelling-place for the entire period laid down in the order.
Naslov pod členom 22, poglavje 5 a (novo)
Title, below Article 22, Chapter 5a (new)
POGLAVJE 5a – VARSTVO PODATKOV
CHAPTER 5 a - DATA PROTECTION
Okvirni sklep o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, še ni sprejet.
The Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters is not yet adopted.
Za preprečitev pravne praznine in zagotovitev ustreznega varstva poslanih podatkov je treba v ta okvirni sklep vključiti poglavje o varstvu podatkov.
To avoid lacunae and to ensure appropriate protection of data transmitted it is necessary to include a Chapter on Data protection in this Framework Decision.
Varstvo osebnih podatkov
Data protection
Obdelava osebnih podatkov za namen tega okvirnega sklepa je v skladu vsaj z naslednjimi temeljnimi načeli:
The processing of personal data for the purpose of this Framework Decision shall comply with at least the following basic principles:
a) podatki se obdelajo le, če to dovoljuje zakonodaja ter je to nujno in sorazmerno za zbiranje in/ali nadaljnjo obdelavo;
a) data processing shall only be undertaken insofar as it is permitted by law and is necessary and proportionate for the purpose of collection and/or further processing;
Člen 22 b (novo)
Article 22 b (new)
Člen 22b
Article 22b
Vse osebe, na katere se podatki nanašajo, se obvesti o obdelavi osebnih podatkov, ki jih zadevajo.
All data subjects shall be informed of the fact that personal data concerning them are being processed.
Zagotavljanje teh informacij se lahko po potrebi odloži, da se ne onemogoči doseganja namena obdelave podatkov.
The provision of that information may be delayed where necessary in order not to hamper the purposes for which the data are being processed.
Oseba, na katero se podatki nanašajo, ima pravico, da brez nepotrebnega odlašanja in v jeziku, ki ga razume, pridobi informacije o tem, kateri podatki se obdelujejo, ter da se popravi in po potrebi izbriše podatke, ki so bili obdelani v nasprotju z načeli iz člena 22a.
A data subject shall have the right to obtain, without undue delay, information as to which data are being processed in a language which he or she understands, as well as to rectify and, where appropriate, erase data processed in breach of the principles referred to in Article 22a.
Zagotavljanje informacij iz odstavkov 1 ali 2 se lahko zavrne ali odloži, če je nujno treba:
The provision of information under paragraphs 1 or 2 may be refused or delayed, where strictly necessary:
(a) zagotoviti varnost in javni red;
(a) to protect security and public order;
(b) preprečiti kriminal;
(b) to prevent a crime;
(c) preprečiti oviranje preiskave in pregona kaznivih dejanj;
(c) so as not to hamper the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences;
(d) zaščititi pravice tretjih oseb.
(d) to protect the rights of third parties.
Pripor pred sojenjem je izjemen ukrep, pri katerem je vedno treba upoštevati pravico do prostosti in domnevo nedolžnosti
Pre-trial detention shall be regarded as an exceptional measure which must be strictly tested against the right to liberty, the presumption of innocence
V skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji mora Unija spoštovati temeljne pravice, kakršne zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP, 1950) in ki kot splošna načela prava Skupnosti izhajajo iz skupnih ustavnih tradicij držav članic.
Article 6(2) TEU provides that the Union shall respect fundamental rights as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR, 1950) and as they result from constitutional traditions common to the Member States, as general principles of Community law.
Temeljne pravice in svoboščine, ki se nanašajo na pripor pred sojenjem in druge možnosti takšnega pripora ter so določene v EKČP, so:
The basic rights or fundamental freedoms that govern pre-trial detention and alternatives to such detention and that are determined by the ECHR are as follows:
– člen 5(1): „vsakdo ima pravico do svobode in osebne varnosti“;
- Art. 5(1) "everyone has the right to liberty and security of person";
– člen 6(2): „kdor je obdolžen kaznivega dejanja, velja za nedolžnega, dokler ni v skladu z zakonom dokazana njegova krivda“;
- Art. 6(2) " everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law";