natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vsake štiri leta in prvič najpozneje do 31. decembra 2011 Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o uporabi te direktive, vključno z ustreznimi podatki o razvoju v poštnem sektorju, še zlasti o gospodarskih, družbenih in zaposlitvenih vzorcih in o tehnoloških vidikih ter o kakovosti storitev.
Every four years, on the first occasion no later than 31 December 2011, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive, including the appropriate information about developments in the sector, particularly concerning economic, social, employment patterns and technological aspects, as well as about quality of service.
Pri popolnem izoblikovanju notranjega trga poštnih storitev in v smeri debirokratizacije bi moralo biti dovolj, da se poročilo predloži vsake štiri leta.
On completion of the single market for postal services, and also in the interest of less red tape, a reporting requirement every four years ought to be enough.
„Obvestilo Komisije o uporabi pravil konkurence v poštnem sektorju in o oceni nekaterih državnih ukrepov v zvezi s poštnimi storitvami (98/C 39/02)“ ne ustreza več trenutnemu stanju.
The Commission’s ‘Notice from the Commission on the application of the competition rules to the postal sector and on the assessment of certain State measures relating to postal services’ (98/C 39/02) is rather out of date.
Investitorji potrebujejo pravno varnost, zato so potrebne smernice Komisije.
Investors need legal certainty, so new Commission guidelines are required.
Člen 23, odstavek 1 a (novo) (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
Article 23, paragraph 1 a (new) (Directive 97/67/CE)
Najkasneje tri leta po dejanskem odprtju trga se predloži ločeno poročilo o splošnih težnjah na področju delovnih mest v sektorju in o delovnih pogojih, ki veljajo pri izvajalcih po posameznih državah članicah.
A separate report on general employment trends in the sector and on the working conditions applied by all operators in every Member State shall be submitted no later than three years from the date of the opening up of the market to competition .
V poročilu so upoštevani tudi ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti prek zakonodaje oziroma s pogajanji med socialnimi partnerji.
The report shall also give an account of measures adopted through legislation or negotiation between the social partners.
Če so ugotovljeni primeri izkrivljanja konkurence, je poročilo – če je to primerno – dopolnjeno z ustreznimi predlogi.
If the report reveals distortions of competition, it shall, if appropriate, also make proposals.
Člen 23 a (novo) (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
Article 23 a (new) (Directive 97/67/EC)
(21a) Vstavi se naslednji člen 23a:
(21a) The following Article 23a shall be inserted:
Člen 23a
" Article 23a
Komisija državam članicam zagotovi pomoč pri izvajanju te direktive, vključno s smernicami za izračunavanje vseh neto stroškov pred 1. januarjem 2009.
The Commission shall provide assistance to the Member States on the implementation of this Directive, including guidance on the calculation of any net cost before 1 January 2009.
Države članice Komisiji predložijo svoje finančne načrte, kot je navedeno v členu 7(3), lahko pa predložijo tudi študije.
Member States shall present to the Commission their financing plans as referred to in Article 7 (3) and may present studies.
ČLEN 2, TOČKA 1, PODODSTAVEK 1
ARTICLE 2, POINT 1, SUBPARAGRAPH 1
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 31. decembra 2008 .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 2008 at the latest.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 31. decembra 2009 .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 2009 at the latest.
Komisija je konec leta 2006 predložila:
At the end of 2006 the Commission submitted:
1. predlog direktive o spremembi direktive 97/67/ES glede popolnega izoblikovanja notranjega trga poštnih storitev (KOM(2006) 594),
1. a Proposal for a directive amending Directive 97/67/EC concerning the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services (COM(2006) 594),
2. možnostno študijo o vplivu dokončnega oblikovanja notranjega trga poštnih storitev v letu 2009 na univerzalno storitev (KOM(2006) 596),
2. a Prospective study on the impact on universal service of the full accomplishment of the postal internal market in 2009 (COM(2006) 596),
3. dva dokumenta z rezultati presoje vpliva (SEC (2006) 1291 in 1292),
3. two documents containing the results of the impact assessment (SEC (2006) 1291 and 1292),
4. poročilo o uporabi poštne direktive (KOM(2006) 595).
4. a report on the on the application of the Postal Directive (COM(2006) 595).
S predložitvijo dokumentov pod točkama 1) in 2) je Komisija izpolnila obveznost, določeno v členu 7(3) poštne direktive.
By submitting documents 1 and 2 above, the Commission has complied with its obligations under Article 7(3) of the Postal Services Directive.
Pripravljalno delo in študije Komisije
Commission’s preparatory work and studies
Predlog Komisije temelji na številnih študijah.
The Commission proposal is based on a large number of studies.
Od leta 1997 jih je bilo naročenih 14, te pa so bile nato dopolnjene še s šestimi večjimi študijami med letoma 2004 in 2006.
Since 1997, 14 studies were commissioned which were then supplemented by six larger studies between 2004 and 2006.
Poleg tega je bilo pripravljenih deset javnih delavnic ter raziskava Eurobarometra o zadovoljstvu potrošnikov.
Ten open workshops and a Eurobarometer survey on consumer satisfaction followed.
Komisija je organizirala tudi javno posvetovanje, v okviru katerega je zbrala 2295 vprašalnikov in 103 dodatne pisne prispevke.
The Commission also carried out a public consultation exercise, during which 2295 questionnaires and 103 other written contributions were submitted.
Možnostna študija
Prospective study
Možnostna študija se močno opira na rezultate sektorske študije iz leta 2006, ki jo je opravilo podjetje PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) o vplivu popolnega odprtja trga na univerzalno storitev.
The prospective study is based essentially on the results of a 2006 sector study by PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) on the Impact on Universal Service of the Full Market Accomplishment of the Postal Market.
Ta je v celoti objavljena na internetni strani
This study may be inspected in full on the Internet at
Le za odročne regije bi morda bili potrebni dodatni ukrepi, če operaterji ne bi razvili zadostne ponudbe.
It merely notes, for remote regions, that there may be a need for assisting measures if insufficient alternatives are offered by market actors.
V zvezi s kakovostjo storitev se pričakuje, da se bodo standardi ohranili; za manj privlačne tržne segmente pa bo predvidoma potreben regulativni nadzor.
On quality of service, it expects standards to be maintained; however, it mentions that regulatory controls could be necessary for less attractive market segments.
Na splošno se pričakuje jasnejša naravnanost ponujenih storitev na potrebe in plačilno pripravljenost strank.
In general, it assumes that the services on offer will be more closely geared to customer needs and willingness to pay.
Glede kriterija dostopnih cen Komisija meni, da bi bilo smiselno določiti zgornjo mejo cen.
As regards the criterion of affordable prices, the Commission feels that upper price limits might be considered.
Glede financiranja univerzalne storitve Komisija predvideva, da bodo operaterji po odprtju trga pripomogli k učinkovitejšemu izvajanju univerzalne storitve in omejili stroške, vendar obenem poudarja, da ne smejo sami odločati o prihodnosti univerzalne storitve.
On the financing of the universal service, the Commission assumes that, following full market opening, market forces will contribute to a more efficient universal service provision and limit costs, though at the same time it stresses that future of universal service cannot be put solely in the hands of market forces.
Zaradi tega je omenjena možnost ad hoc financiranja in regulativnih ukrepov.
The possible need for ad hoc financing and regulatory measures is mentioned.
Zaposlovanje: Pričakuje se, da se bodo z odprtjem trga povečali poštni trgi in se bo izboljšala varnost zaposlovanja pri izvajalcih univerzalne storitve, pri novih operaterjih pa se bodo odprla tudi nova delovna mesta.
Employment: The Commission assumes that the opening of the market will lead to an expansion of postal markets and ultimately contribute to maintaining sustainable employment within universal service providers and creating new jobs with new operators.
Zaključek študije podjetja PriceWaterhouseCoopers je, da odprtje trga leta 2009 ne bi ogrozilo zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve v nobeni državi članici – ta ocena se pojavlja tudi v nadaljnjih študijah.
The PWC study comes to the conclusion that the opening of the market in 2009 would not endanger the provision of the universal service in any of the Member States – a view which is expressed in other studies too.
V posameznih primerih so nujni spremljevalni ukrepi, drugače pa ni potrebno in ustrezno, da bi prestavili datum.
Flanking measures are regarded as necessary in individual cases, but it is not felt to be either necessary or appropriate to postpone the date for market opening.
Študija je pokazala, da bi ustrezne spremljevalne ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovili izvajanje univerzalne storitve, najbolje izvedli na ravni držav članic.
The study considers that appropriate flanking measures to guarantee the provision of the universal service can best be taken at Member State level.
Presoja vpliva
Impact assessment
Pri presoji vpliva (SEC(2000) 1291 in 1292) so bile najprej pripravljene štiri osnovne možnosti:
The impact assessment (SEC(2006) 1291 and 1292) begins by setting out four basic options:
· Možnost A – ni zakonodajnega predloga.
· Option A – no legislative proposal.
Če do takrat ne začne veljati nov predlog, se za poštni sektor uporabljajo določbe Pogodbe ES (zlasti pravila o konkurenci iz člena 86, vključno z odločbami in/ali direktivami Komisije iz člena 86(3).
In other words, if no new proposal has entered into force by then, the postal sector would be governed primarily by EC Treaty rules (in particular the competition rules under Article 86 and Commission decisions and/or directives under Article 86(3)).
· Možnost B – popolnoma nova, celovita poštna direktiva.
· Option B – a substantially new and comprehensive postal services directive.
· Možnost C – podaljšanje roka veljavnosti sedanje poštne direktive čez leto 2009 – to pomeni, da bi se črtala le klavzula o časovni omejitvi veljavnosti iz člena 27.
· Option C – prolongation of the existing Postal Directive beyond 2009 – in this option only the sunset clause ("expiry clause") in Article 27 would be deleted
· Možnost D – prilagoditev veljavne poštne direktive – ohrani in razširi se obstoječi okvir.
· Option D – adapting the existing Directive.
Ta strategija je uporabljena v tej direktivi.
Under this option, the framework already established would be maintained and built on.
Možnosti A in B sta bili v študiji na koncu ovrženi, C in D pa podrobneje analizirani.
This is the strategy pursued in the proposed directive.
Komisija je oblikovala deset specifičnih (podrobno opredeljenih) političnih možnosti, v katerih so zajeti različni parametri, kot so obseg in standard univerzalne storitve, dostop do bistvenih objektov, mehanizmi financiranja, enotne tarife itd.
Options A and B were expressly rejected in the study, while further consideration was given to options C and D. The Commission then worked out ten specific (detailed) political options, in which, by way of experiment, it varied different parameters such as the extent of the universal service, universal standards, access to essential facilities, financing mechanisms, uniform tariffs, etc.
Ker tu ni dovolj prostora, tega ni mogoče natančneje obravnavati.
Owing to lack of space it is not possible to go into further detail on this analysis here: your rapporteur recommends reading the study.
Poročevalec priporoča branje študije – jasno je, da se rezultati presoje vpliva odražajo v elementih, ki so vključeni v predlog direktive.
The results of the impact assessment are of course ultimately reflected in the proposal for a directive.
Podrobnosti predloga Komisije
The Commission proposal in detail
Cilji predloga Komisije so:
The aim of the Commission proposal is:
· popolno izoblikovanje notranjega trga poštnih storitev, se pravi odprava izključnih in posebnih pravic v poštnem sektorju – obenem pa
· to accomplish the internal market in postal services, i.e. to remove exclusive and special rights in the postal sector, while at the same time
· trajna zagotovitev visoke kakovosti univerzalne storitve po dostopnih cenah.
· to sustainably safeguard high-quality universal services at affordable prices, and
· Poleg tega je treba uskladiti osnovna načela za ureditev poštnih storitev.
· to set harmonised principles for the regulation of postal services.
Glede posameznih točk:
Individual points:
Spremljevalni ukrepi:
Flanking measures:
· Odpraviti je treba tudi obveznost predhodnega imenovanja izvajalca(-ev) univerzalne storitve (v členu 4 sedaj veljavne različice poštne direktive).
· The mandatory ex-ante designation of universal service provider(s) (Article 4 of the current version of the Postal Services Directive) is also to be abolished.
Države članice morajo same oblikovati najučinkovitejši in najprimernejši mehanizem za zagotovitev izvajanja univerzalne storitve – prek enega ali več podjetij.
The Member States themselves are to determine the most efficient and appropriate mechanism for the provision – by one or more undertakings – of the universal service.
Pogoji, pod katerimi se zagotavljajo univerzalne storitve, temeljijo na načelih objektivnosti, preglednosti, nediskriminatornosti, sorazmernosti in najmanjšega izkrivljanja trga.
The conditions under which the universal services are entrusted must be based on the principles of objectivity, transparency, non-discrimination, proportionality and least market distortion.
· Tarife univerzalne storitve morajo biti stroškovno naravnane.
· Universal service tariffs must be oriented to costs.
Le v jasno opredeljenih izjemnih primerih se lahko odstopa od načela, da je treba cene opravljanja poštnih storitev oblikovati na podlagi stroškov.
Only in clearly defined exceptional cases is it permitted to deviate from the principle that prices for postal services must be cost-oriented.
Komisija predlaga, da bi države članice enotne tarife omejile na pošiljke, za katere veljajo tarife za en kos, torej na tiste storitve, po katerih večinoma povprašujejo uporabniki in manjša podjetja (člen 12, druga alinea).
The Commission proposes that the Member States should limit tariff uniformity to items subject to single piece tariffs, i.e. to the services which are mostly used by consumers and small enterprises (Article 12, second indent).
Seznam zajema
This list comprises:
· javna nadomestila,
· public compensation,
· postopke javnih naročil ter
· public procurement procedures,
· možno ustanovitev kompenzacijskega sklada.
· possibility of introducing a compensation fund.
Drugi elementi predloga:
Other features of the proposal:
· Države članice lahko še naprej uporabljajo dovoljenja in individualne licence (člen 9), vendar so v predlogu podrobneje navedene možne in nedopustne obveznosti.
· The Member States may continue to use authorisation and individual licenses (Article 9), though the proposal is stricter in specifying which conditions are allowed and which are prohibited.
· Dostop do ključne poštne infrastrukture in storitev: Predlaga se nov člen 11a, na podlagi katerega bodo države članice pod določenimi pogoji pooblaščene za zagotavljanje preglednih in nediskriminatornih pogojev dostopa do določenih elementov poštne infrastrukture (sistem poštnih številk, poštni nabiralniki, poštni predali itd.).
· Access to central postal infrastructures and services: A new Article 11a is proposed which permits the Member States to ensure, under certain conditions, that transparent and non-discriminatory access conditions are available to particular elements of postal infrastructure ( postcode system, post office boxes, collection and delivery boxes etc.).
· Krepitev varstva potrošnikov (člen 19).
· Reinforcing consumer protection (Art. 19).
Med drugim se minimalna načela glede pritožbenih postopkov izvajalca univerzalne storitve razširijo tudi na druge ponudnike.
To this end, the application of minimum principles concerning complaint procedures is extended beyond universal service provider(s).
· Nacionalni regulativni organi: Regulativni organi bodo imeli pomembno vlogo zlasti v prehodnem obdobju do konkurenčnosti.
· National regulatory authorities: The role of national regulatory authorities is likely to remain crucial, in particular during the transition to competition.
V členu 22 se zahtevata ločevanje regulativne funkcije od dejavnosti, povezanih z lastništvom poštnih operaterjev, ter večja preglednost pri dodeljevanju regulativnih nalog.
Article 22 calls for the authorities’ regulatory functions to be separated from activities associated with ownership of postal operators, and for greater transparency in the allocation of regulatory duties.
Ocena in priporočilo poročevalca
Your rapporteur’s assessment and recommendations
V bistvu gre zdaj – poleg vprašanja potrditve leta 2009 kot ciljnega datuma za rezervirano področje – za naslednje teme:
Apart from the confirmation of 2009 as the target date for the reserved sector, the key topics at issue are now the following:
· obseg univerzalne storitve – nadaljnji razvoj v instrument varstva potrošnikov,
· Extent of the universal service – its evolution into a consumer protection instrument
· mehanizme financiranja – so po odpravi rezerviranega področja potrebni alternativni mehanizmi za financiranje univerzalne storitve?
· Financing mechanisms – following the abolition of the reserved sector, is there a need for alternative financing mechanisms?
· dostop do določenih objektov poštne infrastrukture – so tu potrebne posebne določbe?
· Access to specific postal infrastructure facilities: are special rules needed?
Poročevalec je opravil številne temeljite pogovore z akterji v poštnem sektorju in si ustvaril mnenje o njihovih predstavah.
Your rapporteur has held numerous detailed discussions with operators in the postal sector and has formed a comprehensive overview of their ideas.
Glede na obsežno gradivo študij meni, da ima Parlament sedaj na voljo dovolj dokumentacije, na kateri lahko utemelji svojo odločitev in da dodatna obravnava ni potrebna.
In the light of the wide-ranging material available in the form of studies, your rapporteur considers that Parliament now has plenty of documentary evidence on which to base a decision and that there is no need for further hearings, etc.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da je Komisija s tem predlogom načeloma na pravi poti in podpira njegovo splošno naravnanost.
Your rapporteur is convinced that the Commission is basically pursuing the right course and supports the broad lines of the proposal:
To, da je kot ciljni datum določeno leto 2009, za poštne operaterje ne bi smelo biti presenečenje; v sedanji obliki je zapisan že v poštni direktivi in tako že temelji na zavestni odločitvi evropskega zakonodajalca.
The 2009 deadline should come as no surprise to postal operators: it is already in the existing version of the Postal Services Directive and is thus already based on a conscious decision by the European legislator.
Pripravljalno obdobje je bilo dovolj dolgo in po mnenju poročevalca je zdaj pomembno, da se da jasen in zanesljiv znak za odprtje trga.
Plenty of preparatory time was allowed, and your rapporteur considers that it is now important to send a clear and reliable signal on market opening.
Z nadaljnjim odlašanjem bi povzročili nejasnost, pri akterjih vzbudili negotovost in nazadnje kaznovali tiste države in podjetja, ki so že začela z izvajanjem.
Any further delays would create uncertainty, make market actors uneasy and ultimately penalise those countries and undertakings which have acted as pioneers in this field.
Poročevalec opozarja tudi na pozitivne rezultate pri trenutnem tržnem razvoju in zastavljenem usklajevalnem okviru, ki jih je Parlament navedel že v samoiniciativnem poročilu februarja 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0040 ).
Your rapporteur also recalls the positive conclusion which Parliament drew, in an own-initiative report back in February 2006, on developments in the market so far and the harmonisation framework put in place ( P6_TA(2006)0040 ).
Poročevalec vseeno vlaga vrsto predlogov sprememb na določene točke, ki jih je treba dopolniti oz. pojasniti.
Your rapporteur has, nonetheless, tabled a number of amendments on individual points requiring addition or clarification.
Bistvene značilnosti teh sprememb so:
The key points of these amendments are:
a) Za obseg univerzalne storitve je treba najti uravnoteženo rešitev.
a) A balanced solution needs to be found to the question of the extent of the universal service.
Poročevalec predlaga, da bi upoštevali ta razdvojen položaj in univerzalno storitev preoblikovali v instrument varstva potrošnikov – kar pomeni, da bi jo omejili na posamezne pošiljke.
Your rapporteur proposes that this dichotomy should be taken into account and that the universal service be converted into an instrument of consumer protection – in other words, it should be restricted to individual items.
Velike poslovne stranke oz. pošiljatelji masovne pošte ne potrebujejo posebnega varstva, zato bi se lahko izognili nepotrebnim posegom v ponudbo teh storitev (prim. predloga sprememb k uvodni izjavi 14 in odstavku 1 člena 3).
Large business customers and bulk mailers do not require any such protection, and so it would be possible to avoid unnecessary interventions in the provision of these services can be avoided (cf. amendments to recital 14 and Article 13(1)).
b) Poročevalec se zaveda, kako pomembne so dostopne cene poštnih storitev za uporabnike.
b) Your rapporteur is aware of the importance to the consumer of affordable prices for postal services.
Prav je, da ostane ta točka vključena tudi v spremenjeno direktivo.
It is right that this point should remain enshrined in the revised version of the directive.
S predlogoma spremembe k členu 12 bi morali pojasniti pojme in poudariti možnosti, ki jih imajo v zvezi s tem nacionalni regulativni organi.
However, two amendments to Article 12 seek to clarify these concepts and underline the options for the national regulatory authorities in this connection.
c) Dodaten sklop vprašanj se nanaša na status in pravice zaposlenih v poštnem sektorju.
c) Another important complex of issues relates to the status and rights of workers in the postal sector.
Poročevalec spodbuja sprejetje novega člena 9(3a), s katerim bi dodatno pojasnili možnosti držav članic pri določanju zaposlitvenih pogojev.
To that end, your rapporteur calls for the inclusion of a new Article 9(3a) clarifying the Member States’ options for regulating the conditions of employment.
d) Vprašanje stroškovnega računovodstva oz. vodenja računovodske evidence (novo besedilo člena 14) je bistveno, saj lahko pri nenatančnem pripisovanju stroškov pride do izkrivljanja trga.
d) The question of accounting (new version of Article 14) is of crucial importance, since imprecise accounting can easily lead to distortions of the market.
Poročevalec vnaša predlog spremembe, s katerim je natančneje opredeljeno pripisovanje skupnih stroškov (stroškov, ki jih ni mogoče neposredno pripisati določeni storitvi ali izdelku).
Your rapporteur has tabled an amendment seeking to define more precisely the allocation of common costs (costs which cannot be allocated directly to a particular service or product).