natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali lahko generalni sekretariat s trenutno stopnjo zasedenih delovnih mest opravlja vse svoje funkcije?
Can the CGS perform all its functions with the current occupation rate?
Ali je nizka stopnja zasedenih mest specifična za določene službe?
Are lower occupation rates specific to any particular services?
Kakšni so razlogi za stalna razhajanja?
What are the reasons for the persistent discrepancy?
(p) Kakšno je skupno število delovnih mest, namenjenih za naloge usklajevanja politike in upravno podporo (kot so opredeljena v letnih poročilih Komisije o oceni osebja)?
(p) what is the total number of posts assigned to the task of 'policy coordination' and administrative support (as defined in the Commission's annual staff screening reports)?
Kakšen je njihov odstotek glede na skupno število delovnih mest?
What is its percentage in relation to the overall number of posts?
(q) Svet je za dosego upravnih ciljev v letu 2009 delovnim postopkom dodal delo na daljavo.
(q) to achieve the administrative objectives in 2009 the Council added teleworking to its working procedures.
Na kakšen način Svet dokazuje uspešnost tega delovnega postopka?
How does the Council prove the efficiency of this working procedure?
Poleg tega poziva Svet, naj poroča o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi s tem in zlasti o tistih, ki so namenjeni za izboljšanje kakovosti finančnega poslovanja, ter o njihovih učinkih;
In addition, the Council is asked to report on further measures taken in this respect and in particular those to improve the quality of financial management as well as their impact;
(r) Svet je povečal število svojih delovnih mest za 15 (8 AD in 7 AST), da bi pokril kadrovske potrebe enote za irski jezik.
(r) the Council increased its posts by 15 (8 AD and 7 AST) to cover the staffing requirements of the Irish language unit.
Koliko je zaposlenih v drugih jezikovnih enotah (število ljudi na jezik)?
How many staff deal with other languages (staff per language)?
Ali je osebje za države prosilke oziroma iz njih že zaposleno?
Are there already staff employed for and from the applicant countries?
Če je tako, za koliko delovnih mest gre (ločeno po državah in jezikih)?
If the answer is in the affirmative - how many posts are concerned (separated per country and language)?
(s) Skupina za razmislek je bila ustanovljena 14. decembra 2007, njeni člani pa so bili imenovani 15. in 16. oktobra 2008.
(s) the “Reflection Group” was established on 14 December 2007, and its members appointed on 15-16 October 2008.
Zakaj ni bilo mogoče načrtovati potrebnega financiranja in ga vključiti v proračun za leto 2009?
What were the reasons why the necessary financing could not have been envisaged and included in Budget 2009?
Ali prenos v proračun za leto 2009 iz varnostne rezerve v proračunsko postavko, namenjeno financiranju strukture, ki je bila oblikovana leta 2007, v resnici prav nič ne vpliva na proračun?
Is a transfer in Budget 2009 from the contingency reserve to a budget position financing a structure conceived in 2007 strictly budget neutral?
Svet je skupini za premislek namenil 1.060.000 EUR.
The Council earmarked EUR 1°060°000 for the “Reflection Group”.
Koliko delovnih mest se lahko dodeli tej skupini?
How many posts can be allocated to this group?
Zakaj se ti odhodki pojavljajo v toliko različnih proračunskih vrsticah?
Why do these expenditures appear in so many different budget lines?
(u) Zakaj se notranjemu revizorju še vedno zdi, da mora dodati “odhodki za potovanja delegatov in odhodki za tolmačenje” ( les frais de voyage des délégués et les frais d’interprétation ) ne glede na ostre kritike zadnjih dveh resolucij Parlamenta o razrešnici Svetu?
(u) why does the internal audit still find it necessary to add “les frais de voyage des délégués et les frais d’interprétation” (delegates travelling expenses and interpretation expenses) after strong criticism in the last two resolutions from Parliament on the Council discharge?
Zakaj Svet na strani 12 prenos iz tolmačenja na potne stroške poslancev ocenjuje na 12.000.000 EUR, na strani 13 pa na 10.558.362 EUR?
Why is the transfer from interpretation to delegates' travelling expenses estimated at EUR 12 000 000 by the Council at page 12 and at EUR 10°558°362 at page 13?
Zakaj je bil porabljen preostali znesek, prenesen iz tolmačenja (skupni preneseni znesek znaša 17.798.362 EUR)?
What has the remaining amount transferred from interpretation been spent on (the total amount transferred from interpretation is EUR 17°798°362)?
Poleg tega poziva Svet, naj pojasni veliko število nalogov za izterjavo, izdanih pred letom 2009 in prenesenih na leto 2009, (12.300.000 EUR) ter terjatev iz izjav, povezanih z letom 2007 (6.300.000 EUR);
In addition, the Council is asked to explain the large amount of recovery orders made before 2009 and carried over to 2009 (EUR 12°300°000 ) as well as recoveries made from declarations relating to 2007 (EUR 6°300°000)
(w) Svet je leta 2009, kot že leta 2008, prerazporedil znaten znesek iz svojega proračuna zlasti za nepremičninski sektor, ter pri tem več kot podvojil začetne predvidene zneske za nakup stavbe Residence Palace (prerazporeditev v višini 17.800.000 EUR poleg 15.000.000 EUR, ki so bili za ta namen predvideni v proračunu za leto 2009).
(w) in 2009 the Council, as it did in 2008, reallocated a considerable amount of its budget to buildings, in particular, more than doubling the initial allocations to the acquisition of the Residence Palace (reallocated EUR 17 800 000 in addition to EUR 15 000 000 earmarked in Budget 2009).
Kakšni so razlogi za to?
What are the reasons for this?
Ali lahko generalni sekretariat Sveta preloži konkretne podatke o tako dosežnih prihrankih?
Can the CGS provide concrete figures of the savings achieved as a result of this?
Koliko so znašali prvotno predvideni stroški za stavbo Residence Palace?
What was the initially projected cost of the Residence Palace Building ?
Ali Svet meni, da bo prvotno predvideni znesek dosežen, ali bodo stroški višji od predvidevanj?
Does the Council think the initially projected cost will be accurate or could the cost be higher than estimated?
Kateri ukrepi so načrtovani za financiranje te stavbe?
What steps are envisaged to finance the building?
(x) Izvajanje proračuna Sveta – prenesena sredstva: Ali lahko Svet predloži ocenjen znesek in zadeve računov za leto 2009, ki niso bili prejeti do junija 2010, in zato prenesen?
(x) implementation of the Council budget - appropriations carried over: Could the Council present the estimated amount and subject of the invoices which were not received by June 2010 for the year 2009 and therefore carried over?
(y) Prenos sredstev na leto 2010 iz naslova namenskih prejemkov iz leta 2009 je znašal 31.800.000 EUR.
(y) the carryover to 2010 of the appropriations of assigned revenues accrued in 2009 amounted to EUR 31 800 000.
To ustreza približno 70 % namenskih prejemkov za leto 2009.
This is about 70 % of the assigned revenue for 2009.
Kakšni so razlogi za tako visok delež prenosa?
What are the reasons for this high carryover ratio?
Kaj se bo zgodilo/se je zgodilo s temi prihodki leta 2010?
What will happen/has happened to this revenue in 2010?
(z) Kaj pomeni “tehnična zagotovitev 25.000.000 EUR za začetek delovanja Evropskega sveta 2010?” (glej poročilo o finančni dejavnosti – 11327/10, FIN 278 – točka 3.1, točka IV);
(z) what does “technical provision of EUR 25 000 000 for the launch of the European Council 2010” mean? (cf. the financial activity report – 11327/10, FIN 278 - point 3.1, IV bullet)
(aa) Kakšna je stopnja tajnosti proračuna Sveta za različne proračunske vrstice?
(aa) what is the level of confidentiality of the Council budget specified by the different budget lines?
(ab) Ali lahko Svet izpostavi konkretne ukrepe, sprejete za izboljšanje kakovosti finančnega poslovanja Sveta, zlasti glede zadev, omenjenih v odstavku 5 resolucije Parlamenta
(ab) can the Council point out the specific measures taken to improve the quality of the Council's financial management, in particular as regards the points raised in paragraph 5 of Parliament's resolution
9. z dne 25. novembra 2009, priložene sklepu o razrešnici Svetu za proračunsko leto 2007?
9. of 25 November 2009 accompanying its decision on discharge to the Council for the financial year 2007?
Dokumenti, ki jih je treba predložiti Parlamentu
Documents to be presented to Parliament
(a) popoln seznam proračunskih prerazporeditev v zvezi s proračunom Sveta za leto 2009;
(a) the full list of budgetary transfers concerning the 2009 Council budget ,
(b) pisno izjavo o stroških Sveta za misije, ki so jih opravili posebni predstavniki Evropske unije;
(b) a written statement on the Council's mission expenses as carried out by the EUSRs,
(c) izjavo držav članic za leto 2007 (glej poročilo o finančni dejavnosti – 11327/10, FIN 278 – točka 3.2.2, točka II), in
(c) the Members States' declaration for 2007 (cf. the financial activity report – 11327/10, FIN 278 - point 3.2.2, II bullet), and
(d) poročilo skupine za razmislek, da bi razumel, zakaj tako poročilo stane 1.060.000 EUR (glej poročilo o finančni dejavnosti – 11327/10, FIN 278 – točka 2.2).
(d) the report of the “Reflection Group” in order to understand why such a report costs EUR 1 060 000 (cf. the financial activity report – 11327/10, FIN 278 - point 2.2).
Marta Andreasen, Jean-Pierre Audy, Inés Ayala Sender, Zigmantas Balčytis, Andrea Češková, Andrea Cozzolino, Luigi de Magistris, Tamás Deutsch, Martin Ehrenhauser, Jens Geier, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ville Itälä, Ilijana Ivanova (Iliana Ivanova), Bogusław Liberadzki, Monica Luisa Macovei, Jan Olbrycht, Aldo Patriciello, Crescenzio Rivellini, Christel Schaldemose, Bart Staes, Georgios Stavrakakis, Søren Bo Søndergaard
Marta Andreasen, Jean-Pierre Audy, Inés Ayala Sender, Zigmantas Balčytis, Andrea Češková, Andrea Cozzolino, Luigi de Magistris, Tamás Deutsch, Martin Ehrenhauser, Jens Geier, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ville Itälä, Iliana Ivanova, Bogusław Liberadzki, Monica Luisa Macovei, Jan Olbrycht, Aldo Patriciello, Crescenzio Rivellini, Christel Schaldemose, Bart Staes, Georgios Stavrakakis, Søren Bo Søndergaard
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o približevanju zakonodaj držav članic, ki se nanašajo na merske enote (kodificirano besedilo)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement (codified text)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0507 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0507 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7‑0287/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0287/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve (A7‑0000/2011),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0089/2011 ),
1. kot svoje stališče na prvi obravnavi sprejme predlog Komisije, kakor je bil prilagojen v skladu s priporočili posvetovalne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
V Bruslju, 15. novembra 2010
Brussels, 15 November 2010
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o približevanju zakonodaj držav članic, ki se nanašajo na merske enote (kodificirano besedilo)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement (codified text)
KOM(2010)0507 z dne 27.9.2010 – 2010/0260(COD)
COM(2010)0507 of 27.9.2010 – 2010/0260(COD)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, še zlasti z odstavkom 4, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala 7. oktobra 2010, da bi proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the consultative working party consisting of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission met on 7 October 2010 in order to consider, among others, the above-mentioned Commission proposal.
Posvetovalna skupina je po proučitvi
When it examined
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo 22 uradnih jezikovnih različic in je delala na podlagi francoske različice, ki je izvirni jezik obravnavanega besedila. predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za kodifikacijo Direktive Sveta št. 80/181/EGS z dne 20. decembra 1979 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic, ki se nanašajo na merske enote, in o razveljavitvi direktive 71/354/EGS soglasno ugotovila, da predlog vsebuje le kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb zadevnih aktov.
The Working Party had at its disposal 22 language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the French version, being the original version of the working document. the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council codifying Council Directive 80/181/EEC of 20 December 1979 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement and the repeal of Directive 71/354/EEC, the Working Party established, by common accord, that the proposal is indeed confined to straightforward codification and makes no substantive changes to the acts in question.
ROMERO REQUENApravni svetovalec
Jurisconsult Director-General
Približevanje zakonodaj držav članic, ki se nanašajo na merske enote (Kodificirana različica)
Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement (codified version)
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vgradnji, legi, delovanju in označevanju upravljal kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev na kolesih (kodificirano besedilo)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the installation, location, operation and identification of the controls of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (codified text)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0717 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0717 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7‑0404/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0404/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7‑0090/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0090/2011 ),
V Bruslju, 19. januarja 2011
Brussels, 19 January 2011
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vgradnji, legi, delovanju in označevanju upravljal kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev na kolesih (kodificirano besedilo)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the installation, location, operation and identification of the controls of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (codified text)
KOM(2010)0717 z dne 8.12.2010 – 2010/0348(COD)
COM(2010)0717 of 8.12.2010 – 2010/0348(COD)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, še zlasti z odstavkom 4, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala dne 16. december 2010, da bi proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 16 December 2010 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo 22 jezikovnih različic predloga in je delala na podlagi angleške različice, ki je izvirna jezikovna različica obravnavanega besedila. predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kodifikaciji Direktive Sveta 86/415/EGS z dne 24. julija 1986 o vgradnji, legi, delovanju in označevanju upravljal kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev na kolesih, soglasno ugotovila, da predlog vsebuje le kodifikacijo obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal 22 language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council codifying Council Directive 86/415/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the installation, location, operation and identification of the controls of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s concluding, without dissent, that the proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts, without any change in their substance.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2000/25/ES glede določb za traktorje, dane na trg v okviru sistema prožnosti
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/25/EC as regards the provisions for tractors placed on the market under the flexibility scheme
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................20
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ................................19
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0607 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0607 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0342/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0342/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 16. februarja 2011
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16 February 2011
UL C ... / Še ni objavljeno v UL. ,
OJ C ... /Not yet published in the Official Journal. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ter mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7-0091/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0091/2011 ),
(1) Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/25/ES z dne 22. maja 2000 o ukrepih, ki jih je treba sprejeti proti emisijam plinastih in trdnih onesnaževal iz motorjev, namenjenih za pogon kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev in spremembi Direktive Sveta 74/150/EGS 1 ureja emisije izpušnih plinov iz motorjev, vgrajenih v kmetijske in gozdarske traktorje.
(1) Directive 2000/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2000 on action to be taken against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants by engines intended to power agricultural or forestry tractors and amending Council Directive 74/150/EEC 9 regulates exhaust emissions from engines installed in agricultural and forestry tractors.
Mejne vrednosti stopnje IV, ki so strožje od stopnje III B, bodo začele veljati postopoma od 1. januarja 2013 za homologacijo navedenih motorjev in od 1. januarja 2014 za dajanje na trg.
Stage IV, providing for limit values more stringent than stage III B, will enter into force progressively as of 1st January 2013 as regards the type approval for those engines and as of 1st January 2014 with regard to the placing on the market.
(1) Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/25/ES z dne 22. maja 2000 o ukrepih, ki jih je treba sprejeti proti emisijam plinastih in trdnih onesnaževal iz motorjev, namenjenih za pogon kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev, in spremembi Direktive Sveta 74/150/EGS 9 ureja emisije izpušnih plinov iz motorjev, vgrajenih v kmetijske in gozdarske traktorje za dodatno zaščito zdravja ljudi in varstvo okolja .
(1) Directive 2000/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2000 on action to be taken against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants by engines intended to power agricultural or forestry tractors and amending Council Directive 74/150/EEC 9 regulates exhaust emissions from engines installed in agricultural and forestry tractors with a view to further safeguard ing human health and the environment .
Eden od ciljev direktive 2000/25/ES je čim bolj povečati koristi za evropsko okolje in javno zdravje.
One of the objectives of Directive 2000/25/EC is to maximise the benefits for the European environment and public health.
(1a) Komisija naj bi v 12 mesecih predstavila obsežno revizijo Direktive 2000/25/ES.
(1a) The Commission is expected to come forward with a comprehensive revision of Directive 2000/25/EC within 12 months.
Najbolje je, da Komisija to obsežno revizijo predstavi čim prej.
It is preferable for the Commission to present the comprehensive revision at its earliest convenience.
Komisija je sedanji predlog za delno revizijo direktive 2000/25/ES predstavila razmeroma pozno, saj ukrepi, ki jih Komisija namerava spremeniti, delno veljajo od 1. januarja 2011.
The Commission came forward with the present proposal on the partial revision of Directive 2000/25/EC in a relatively late stage, as the measures the Commission intends to amend are partially in force as per 1 January 2011.
Popolna revizija te direktive bi omogočila celovitejšo obravnavo sedanje ureditve.
A full revision of Directive 2000/25/EC would allow of dealing with the current regulation in a more comprehensive manner.
(2) Prehod na stopnjo III B vključuje veliko spremembo v tehnologiji, ki zahteva bistvene izvedbene stroške za preoblikovanje motorjev in razvoj naprednih tehničnih rešitev.
(2) The transition to Stage III B involves a step change in technology requiring significant implementation costs for re-designing the engines and for developing advanced technical solutions.
Ta prehod, ki ga je zakonodajalec določil leta 2005, sovpada z gospodarsko recesijo v zadevnem sektorju, zaradi česar industrija s težavo krije stroške izvajanja, potrebne za prilagoditev novim pravnim zahtevam .
This transition stipulated by the legislator in 2005 coincides with the economic recession in the sector concerned which makes it difficult for the industry to bear the implementation costs necessary in order to adapt to the new legal requirements .
Finančna in gospodarska kriza ne more biti razlog za omilitev okoljskih standardov.
The global financial and economic crisis cannot serve as a reason to water down environmental standards.
Naložbe in okolju prijazne tehnologije so pomembne za spodbujanje prihodnje rasti, delovnih mest in zdravstveno varnost .
Investments in environmentally friendly technologies are important for the promotion of future growth, jobs and health security .
Med sedanjo razpravo je Komisija menila , da je svetovna finančna in gospodarska kriza globoko prizadela zadevno industrijo.
In the current debate the Commission has suggested that the global financial and economic crisis has had a deeply negative impac t on the related industry.