natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalka je zato zadovoljna z dejstvom, da je Svet v delni meri sprejel kompromis v zvezi z uporabo okvirnega sklepa, kar je bilo predlagano v zadnjem poročilu Parlamenta.
I am thus satisfied by the fact that the Council has partly adopted the compromise regarding the scope of the Framework Decision which we suggested in our last report.
Se je pa Parlament vedno potegoval za trden in varovalen okvirni sklep, ki bo omogočal raven varstva podatkov, enako vsaj tej, ki jo v prvem stebru zagotavljata direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov ter konvencija Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov v zvezi z avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov (konvencija št. 108).
However, the European Parliament has always insisted in favour of a strong and protective Framework Decision which would allow a level of data protection at least equivalent to that insured in the first pillar by the Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (Convention 108).
Poročevalka zato obžaluje, da je Svet prvotni predlog Komisije oropal njegove vsebine in da je dosegel politični dogovor na najnižjem možnem skupnem imenovalcu.
I therefore regret that the Council has emptied the original Commission proposal of its content and has reached political agreement on the lowest possible common denominator.
To je cena pravila o soglasju, ki velja v Svetu.
This is the price of the rule of unanimity in the Council.
Raven varstva podatkov v tem besedilu je minimalna in pušča zelo resne vrzeli.
The level of data protection of this text is minimal and also leaves very serious gaps.
V nekaterih primerih se celo postavlja vprašanje, ali spoštuje standarde iz konvencije št. 108 v zvezi z načelom sorazmernosti, ki je temeljno načelo pri varstvu podatkov.
In some cases, one might even question whether it respects the standards set by the Convention 108 especially with regards to the principle of proportionality which is a fundamental principle of data protection.
Poročevalka zato predlaga niz pomembnih predlogov sprememb, ki bi obravnavala vprašanja, ki Parlament že od nekdaj najbolj skrbijo.
I therefore propose a series of significant amendments which aim at addressing the issues which have always been at the heart of the concern voiced by the European Parliament:
Zagotavljanje načel sorazmernosti in omejitve namena:
Insuring the principles of proportionality and purpose limitation:
Člen 3 določa pogoja glede omejitve namena in sorazmernosti.
Article 3 sets the conditions for purpose limitation and proportionality.
Zbiranje osebnih podatkov mora biti pravično in zakonito, kot to predpisuje člen 9 konvencije št. 108.
The collection of personal data must be fair and lawful as set out by article 9 of the Convention 108.
Nadaljnja obdelava bi morala biti mogoča od primera do primera, da bi upoštevala poseben značaj policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja, vendar le v primeru, da je združljiva z nameni, za katere so bili podatki zbrani.
Further processing should be possible on a case by case basis in order to take into account the specific nature of police and judicial cooperation but only if it is compatible with the purposes for which the data was collected.
Člen 12(d) dopušča uporabo podatkov za „vse druge namene”, kar je preširoko in ne omogoča doslednega spoštovanja omejitve namena.
Article 12 (d) however allows for the data to be used for "any other purpose" which is too wide and does not allow for the full respect of purpose limitation.
Poročevalka zato predlaga, da bi določili jasne in precejšnje omejitve pri nadaljnji obdelavi.
The rapporteur therefore suggests setting clear and substantive limitations to any further processing.
Privolitev države članice, ki posreduje podatke, sama po sebi ne more zadostovati.
The consent of the transmitting Member State in itself cannot be considered as sufficient.
Občutljivi podatki
Sensitive Data
Obdelava posebnih kategorij podatkov bi morala biti izjema in ne pravilo ter bi morala biti dovoljena v zelo strogih in jasno določenih primerih, ki jih predpisuje zakon.
The processing of special categories of data should be the exception rather than the rule and should only be permissible in very strict and well defined cases provided by law.
Posredovanje podatkov tretjim državam
Transfer of Data to Third Countries
Poročevalka je vesela, da je bil v besedilo znova vključen člen 14(4), ki predvideva oceno o ustreznosti ravni varstva, ki ga zagotavljajo tretje države.
I am happy to see the reinsertion of Article 14(4) which provides for the assessment of the adequacy of the level of protection insured by the Third Country.
To je bila namreč prioriteta Parlamenta.
This was a priority for the European Parliament.
Je pa ta klavzula lahko učinkovita le, če ugotovitve glede ustreznosti sprejme neodvisni organ in ne država članica, ki posreduje podatke.
However, this clause can only be effective if the adequacy finding is made by an independent authority and not the Member State transferring the data.
Posredovanje podatkov zasebnim strankam
Transfer to private parties
Med pogajanji o direktivi o hrambi podatkov, zbranih ali obdelanih v zvezi z zagotavljanjem javnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, je Parlament vztrajal pri dostopu nacionalnih organov do podatkov, ki jih hranijo zasebne stranke.
During negotiations on the Directive on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services, the European Parliament insisted that the issue of national authorities should have a possibility to access data stored by private parties.
Poročevalka zato predlaga, da se ta koncept znova vključi v besedilo v skladu s prejšnjimi poročili Parlamenta.
I therefore propose to reinsert this concept in conformity with our previous reports.
Pravica dostopa do podatkov
Right of access
Posameznik, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, ne more v celoti uveljavljati svoje pravice do popravka ali pravnih sredstev, če ni seznanjen, za katere namene bodo podatki v zvezi z njim obdelani.
The data subject cannot fully exercise his rights to rectification or judicial remedies if he is not informed of the purposes for which the data concerning him are being processed.
Delovna skupina in nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov
Working Party and national data protection authorities
Poročevalka je presenečena, da je Svet zelo pozno v razpravi to pomembno določbo črtal.
I am surprised that this important provision has been deleted by the Council at a very late stage in the discussions.
Forum nacionalnih in evropskih nadzornih organov je potreben, da bi zagotovili usklajeno izvajanje okvirnega sklepa.
A forum of national and European supervisory authorities is needed to insure harmonised application of the Framework Decision.
Takšna skupina s členom 29 o delovni skupini obstaja v prvem stebru in bi morala obstajati tudi v tretjem stebru.
Such a group exists in the first pillar with the Article 29 Working Party and should also exist in the third pillar.
Poročevalka zato predlaga, da bi v besedilo znova vključili člen o oblikovanju delovne skupine in da bi jasno določili njene naloge.
I therefore suggest to reinsert the article providing the creation of a Working Party and to define its tasks clearly.
Nadalje bi bilo treba razširiti vlogo nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov, s katerimi bi se bilo treba posvetovati v zvezi z ukrepi, ki zadevajo varstvo osebnih podatkov v policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju, na enak način, kot to za prvi steber določa člen 28(2) direktive 95/46/ES.
Furthermore, the role of national data protection authorities should be extended to being consulted with regard measures relating to the protection of personal data in police and judicial cooperation in the same way that Article 28(2) of Directive 95/46/EC provides for the first pillar.
o predlogu okvirnega sklepa Sveta o spremembi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/475/PNZ o boju proti terorizmu
on the proposal for a Council Framework Decision amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2007)0650 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0650 )
– ob upoštevanju orientacijske razprave Sveta 18. aprila 2008
– having regard to the Council guideline of 18 April 2008
Glej javni register Sveta: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/fr/08/st08/st08707.fr08.pdf ,
See the Council’s public register: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/fr/08/st08707.fr08.pdf ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 29, člena 31(1)(e) in člena 34(2)(b) pogodbe o EU,
– having regard to Article 29, Article 31(1)(e) and Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) pogodbe o EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0466/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0466/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0323/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0323/2008 ),
6. izjavlja, da je že pripravljen, ko bo začela veljati lizbonska pogodba, za pregled takšnega predloga, če bo potrebno v okviru nujnega postopka in v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti; če bi novi predlog odražal vsebino tega mnenja, bi se lahko uporabljal predvideni postopek iz medinstitucionalnega sporazuma na področju kodifikacije;
Declares itself already prepared – once the Lisbon Treaty comes into force – to consider any such proposal if necessary in accordance with the urgency procedure and in close cooperation with Member States' parliaments; should the new proposal reflect the substance of this opinion, the procedure laid down in the interinstitutional agreement as regards codification could apply;
Predlog okvirnega sklepa – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a framework decision – amending act
(6a) Dejavnost Evropske unije v boju proti terorizmu je treba voditi v tesnem sodelovanju z lokalnimi in regionalnimi organi, ki igrajo ključno vlogo, zlasti na področju preprečevanja, kadar storilci terorističnih dejanj ali napeljevalci k njim živijo v lokalnih skupnostih, kjer se povezujejo s prebivalstvom ter uporabljajo njihove storitve in instrumente demokracije.
(6 a ) EU action to combat terrorism should be undertaken in close cooperation with local and regional authorities who have a key role to play , particular ly in relation to prevention , in so far as the instigators and perpetrators of terrorist acts live within local communities with whose population they interact , and whose services and instruments of democracy they e mploy .
Lokalne skupnosti morajo bolj poudariti svojo vlogo na področju, ki neposredno zadeva pravice državljanov, ne le zato, ker tvorijo upravno raven, ki je najbližja državljanom, ampak tudi zato, ker storilci terorističnih dejanjih in napeljevalci k njim v teh skupnostih živijo vsakodnevno življenje.
In an area which so directly affects citizens' rights, local and regional authorities should have an enhanced role to play, not only because they constitute the administrative level which is closest to those citizens but also because the instigators and perpetrators of terrorist acts go about their daily business within the communities concerned.
(7) Ta predlog predvideva inkriminacijo kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorizmom, da bi tako prispeval k splošnejšemu političnemu cilju preprečevanja terorizma z zmanjšanjem razširjanja gradiv, ki bi lahko spodbudila posameznike k izvrševanju terorističnih napadov.
(7) The current proposal foresees the criminalisation of terrorist linked offences in order to contribute to the more general policy objective of prevention of terrorism through reducing the dissemination of those materials which might incite persons to commit terrorist attacks.
(7) Ta predlog predvideva inkriminacijo kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorizmom, da bi tako prispeval k splošnejšemu političnemu cilju preprečevanja terorizma z zmanjšanjem razširjanja gradiv, ki imajo namen in bi lahko spodbudila posameznike k izvrševanju terorističnih napadov.
(7) The current proposal foresees the criminalisation of terrorist linked offences in order to contribute to the more general policy objective of prevention of terrorism through reducing the dissemination of those materials with the intention and the likelihood to incite persons to commit terrorist attacks.
(10) Opredelitev terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, vključno s kaznivimi dejanji, povezanimi s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, je treba dodatno približati v vseh državah članicah, tako da bo zajemala javno spodbujanje k terorističnemu kaznivemu dejanju, novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti, če je to dejanje namerno.
(10) The definition of terrorist offences, including offences linked to terrorist activities, should be further approximated in all Member States, so that it will cover public provocation to commit a terrorist offence, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
Opredelitev terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, vključno s kaznivimi dejanji, povezanimi s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, je treba dodatno približati v vseh državah članicah, tako da bo zajemala javno napeljevanje k terorističnemu kaznivemu dejanju, novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti, če je to dejanje namerno.
(10) The definition of terrorist offences, including offences linked to terrorist activities, should be further approximated in all Member States, so that it will cover public incitement to commit a terrorist offence, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
Zaželeno je, da se pojem „spodbujanje” nadomesti z „napeljevanje”, če je slednji jasneje opredeljen in se pogosteje uporablja v jeziku kazenskega prava.
The term ‘provocation’ should be replaced by the term ‘incitement’, since the latter is a clearer concept and it is more frequently used in legal language.
Poleg tega je bil pojem „napeljevanje” sprejet v predlogu okvirnega sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji.
Furthermore, the term ‘incitement’ is the one which has been adopted in the proposal for a framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia.
(11) Treba je določiti kazni in sankcije za fizične in pravne osebe, ki so storile ali lahko storijo dejanja javnega spodbujanja k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenja in usposabljanja za teroristične dejavnosti, če so ta dejanja storjena nezakonito in namerno.
(11) Penalties and sanctions should be provided for natural and legal persons having committed or being liable for public provocation to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
Takšne oblike ravnanja bi morale biti enako kaznive v vseh državah članicah, ne glede na to, ali so bila dejanja storjena prek interneta ali ne.
These forms of behaviour should be equally punishable in all Member States irrespective of whether they are committed through the Internet or not.
(11) Treba je določiti kazni in sankcije za fizične in pravne osebe, ki so storile dejanja javnega napeljevanja k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenja in usposabljanja za teroristične dejavnosti, če so ta dejanja storjena nezakonito in namerno.
(11) Penalties and sanctions should be provided for natural and legal persons having committed public incitement to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
(12) Določiti je treba dodatna pravila glede pristojnosti za zagotovitev učinkovitega pregona javnega spodbujanja k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenja in usposabljanja za teroristične dejavnosti, ko so ta dejanja usmerjena v storitev ali pomenijo storitev terorističnega kaznivega dejanja, ki je v pristojnosti države članice.
(12) Additional jurisdictional rules should be established to ensure that public provocation to commit a terrorist offence, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism may be effectively prosecuted when they are directed towards or resulted in the commission of a terrorist offence which is subject to the jurisdiction of a Member State .
Uvodna izjava odraža nov odstavek 1a, ki ga želi Komisija dodati členu 9 okvirnega sklepa.
This recital echoes the new paragraph 1a which the Commission is proposing to add to Article 9 of the framework decision.
(12a) Okvirni sklep dopolnjujejo določbe konvencije Sveta Evrope o preprečevanju terorizma z dne 16. maja 2005, zato je nujno, da vzporedno z začetkom njegove veljavnosti vse države članice v najkrajšem možnem času ratificirajo omenjeno konvencijo.
(12a) T his Framework D ecision is complementary to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism of 16 May 2005, and it is therefore essential, in parallel with the entry into force of this Framework Decision, that all Member States ratify that Convention.
Vsekakor je pametno, da se v pravni okvir Unije in točneje v okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ vključijo kazniva dejanja, predvidena s konvencijo Sveta Evrope, ker bo s tem mogoče za tovrstna kazniva dejanja vzpostaviti popolnejšo pravno ureditev.
Including the offences set out in the Council of Europe Convention within the Union’s legal framework, and more specifically Framework Decision 2002 475/JHA, is unquestionably of added value since this would insert those offences into a more comprehensive legal regime.
Seveda pa morajo države članice konvencijo najprej ratificirati, ker je okvirni sklep ne nadomešča.
There is nevertheless a need for Member States to ratify that Convention, since the Framework Decision is not intended to replace it.
Vzporedna uporaba obeh instrumentov bo jamstvo za večjo zaščito pred terorizmom v sami Uniji, pa tudi v tretjih državah, ki so članice Sveta Evrope.
The parallel implementation of both instruments will provide even greater protection against terrorism, both in the EU and in third countries that are members of the Council of Europe.
(14) Unija spoštuje načela, ki jih priznava člen 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in ki se odražajo v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti v poglavjih II in VI Listine.
(14) The Union observes the principles recognised by Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Chapters II and VI thereof.
Ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu ni mogoče razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju temeljnih pravic ali svoboščin, kot so svoboda izražanja misli, zbiranja ali združevanja, pravica do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja, vključno s pravico do spoštovanja zaupnosti korespondence.
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict fundamental rights or freedoms such as freedom of expression, assembly, or of association, the right to respect for private and family life, including the right to respect of the confidentiality of correspondence.
Ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu ni mogoče razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju temeljnih pravic ali svoboščin, kot so svoboda izražanja misli, zbiranja ali združevanja, svoboda tiska ter svoboda izražanja drugih medijev, ali pravica do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja, vključno s pravico do spoštovanja zaupnosti korespondence, in sicer tudi vsebine elektronskih sporočil in drugih oblik elektronske korespondence .
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict fundamental rights or freedoms such as freedom of expression, assembly, or of association, freedom of the press and freedom of expression of other media, or the right to respect for private and family life, including the right to respect of the confidentiality of correspondence, which also covers the content of e-mail and other kinds of electronic correspondence.
(15) Javno spodbujanje k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti so namerna kazniva dejanja .
(15) Public provocation to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism are intentional crimes.
Zato ni mogoče ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju razširjanja informacij za znanstvene, akademske ali poročevalske namene.
Therefore, nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic or reporting purposes.
Izražanje radikalnih, polemičnih ali spornih stališč v javnih razpravah o občutljivih političnih vprašanjih, vključno s terorizmom, ne spada v področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa in zlasti ne v opredelitev javnega spodbujanja k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem.
The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the definition of public provocation to commit terrorist offences,
(15) Javno napeljevanje k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti so namerna kazniva dejanja .
(15) Public incitement to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism are intentional crimes.
Zato ni mogoče ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju razširjanja informacij za znanstvene, akademske , umetniške ali poročevalske namene.
Therefore, nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic , artistic or reporting purposes.
Izražanje radikalnih, polemičnih ali spornih stališč v javnih razpravah o občutljivih političnih vprašanjih, vključno s terorizmom, ne sodi na področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa in zlasti ne v opredelitev javnega napeljevanja k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem –
The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the definition of public incitement to commit terrorist offences,
Enaka obrazložitev kot pri predlogu spremembe 2.
Same justification as for Amendment 2.
Poleg tega je pomembno, da se razširjanju umetniških stvaritev namenjena enako varstvo kot razširjanju znanstvenih in akademskih podatkov ali podatkov za informativne namene.
Furthermore, the dissemination of artists' products must enjoy the same protection as the dissemination of information for scientific, academic or reporting purposes.
Člen 1 – točka -1 (novo)
Article 1 - point -1 (new)
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ
Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA
(–1) Člen 1(2) se spremeni na nslednji način:
(-1) Article 1(2) is amended as follows:
Ta okvirni sklep ne spreminja dolžnosti spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih pravnih načel, kot je zapisano v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji , v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah. “
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of altering the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union , in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in the European Convention on Human Rights. "
Člen 3 – odstavek 1 – točka (a)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point (a)