natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, zlasti s točko 9, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 21. januarja 2009, da bi med drugim proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 21 January 2009 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Na tej seji
At that meeting
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna jezikovna različica obravnavanega besedila. je posvetovalna delovna skupina po preučitvi predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenovitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2725/2000 z dne 11. decembra 2000 o vzpostavitvi sistema „Eurodac“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Dublinske konvencije soglasno zaključila, kot sledi.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of "Eurodac" for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
2) V členu 12(2) bi bilo treba sklic na člen 21(3) prilagoditi tako, da se bo glasil „ s členom 20(3) “.
1) In Article 12(2), the reference made to " Article 21(3) " should be adapted so as to read as a reference made to " Article 20(3) ".
2) Naslednji deli besedila predloga za prenovitev bi morali biti označeni s sivo osenčeno pisavo, ki se navadno uporablja za označevanje vsebinskih sprememb:
2) The following parts of the text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes:
- celotno besedilo točke (b) člena 13(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 2725/2000, ki je prečrtano z dvojno črto in navedeno med besediloma točk (a) in (b) člena 15(4) predloga za prenovitev;
- the entire wording of point (b) of Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000, having been identified with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of points (a) and (b) of Article 15(4) in the recast proposal;
- v členu 20(4), drugi pododstavek, besedi „ Komisijo in “ (ki sta predstavljeni med puščicama, ki označujeta spremembo);
- in Article 20, second subparagraph, the words " the Commission and "(having been presented between adaptation arrows);
- v členu 22 predlagana zamenjava besede „ Komisija “ z besedami „ upravljavski organ ali druga država članica “.
- in Article 22, the proposed replacement of the word " Commission " with the words " Management Authority or another Member State ".
Vzpostavitev sistema “Eurodac” za primerjavo prstnih odtisov (prenovitev)
Establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints (recast version)
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito , ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države ali oseba brez državljanstva (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast)
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA, SVETA IN KOMISIJE 36
ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION 38
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države ali oseba brez državljanstva (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0820 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0820 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 63(1)(a) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0474/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 63(1), point 1a, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0474/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0284/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6‑0000/2009),
(5a) Glede postopnega uvajanja skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, ki naj bi dolgoročno vodil k skupnemu postopku in enotnemu statusu po vsej Uniji za tiste, ki jim je odobren azil, je na tej stopnji, ob uvajanju potrebnih izboljšav na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj, primerno potrditi načela, na katerih temelji konvencija o določanju države, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošenj za azil, vloženih v eni od držav članic Evropskih skupnosti, podpisana v Dublinu 15. junija 1990 (dublinska konvencija), katere izvajanje je spodbudilo proces usklajevanja azilnih politik.
(5a) As regards the introduction in successive phases of a C ommon European A sylum S ystem that should lead, in the longer term, to a common procedure and a uniform status, valid throughout the Union, for those granted asylum, it is appropriate at this stage, while making the necessary improvements in the light of experience, to confirm the principles underlying the Convention determining the State responsible for examining applications for asylum lodged in one of the Member States of the European Communities, signed in Dublin on 15 June 1990 (the Dublin Convention), whose implementation has stimulated the process of harmonising asylum policies.
Predlog spremembe je potreben, ker bi v nasprotnem primeru šlo za odstopanje od enega izmed bistvenih temeljev dublinskega sistema, in sicer načela „samo ena možnost“ („one chance only“– samo enkratno obravnavanje prošnje za azil v EU).
This amendment is necessary because otherwise the text would represent a departure from one of the most fundamental pillars of the Dublin system, namely the principle of ‘one chance only’ (one examination only of an application for asylum in the EU).
(6a) Službe držav članic, pristojne za področje azila, potrebujejo konkretno pomoč pri uresničevanju svojih vsakodnevnih in operativnih nalog.
(6a) The services of the Member States responsible for asylum should receive practical aid to meet their day-to-day operational requirements.
Pri tem bo imel bistveno vlogo prihodnji urad za podporo azilu.
Here the future European Asylum Support Office will play a vital role.
Okrepiti je treba upravno sodelovanje med državami članicami, da bi zbližali različne nacionalne prakse.
There is a need to strengthen administrative cooperation between Member States, so as to bring different national practices into line.
Urad bo podpiral države članice pri izvajanju bolj usklajene in pravične politike azila, na primer pri opredeljevanju dobre prakse, organizaciji usposabljanja ali usklajevanju skupin nacionalnih strokovnjakov za podporo, na katere se bodo države članice lahko obrnile, kadar bo na njihovem ozemlju mnogo prosilcev za azil.
The Office will support Member States in applying a more consistent and fairer asylum policy, for instance by defining good practice, organising training courses or coordinating support teams of national experts to which Member States can have recourse when there is a large influx of asylum-seekers in their territory.
(15) Organizirati bi bilo treba osebni razgovor, ki bi omogočil lažjo določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, in kjer je potrebno, ustno obveščanje prosilcev o uporabi te uredbe.
(15) A personal interview should be organised in order to facilitate the determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection and , where necessary , to orally inform applicants about the application of this Regulation.
(15) Organizirati bi bilo treba osebni razgovor, ki bi omogočil lažjo določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, in ustno obveščanje prosilcev o uporabi te uredbe.
(15) A personal interview should be organised in order to facilitate the determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection and to orally inform applicants about the application of this Regulation.
Prosilci bi morali biti vedno ustno obveščeni o uporabi te uredbe.
The applicants should be informed orally about the application of this Regulation at all times.
(17a) Za namene te uredbe izraz „pridržanje“ ne bi smel imeti kazenske konotacije, temveč bi se moral razumeti izključno kot upravni ukrep začasnega značaja, ki je enakovreden upravnemu pridržanju.
(17a) For the purposes of this Regulation “detention” should not carry a penal or punitive connotation, but should mean an exclusively administrative and temporary measure equivalent to a holding operation.
Kot že večkrat rečeno, je treba razlikovati med postopkom običajnega pridržanja in upravnega pridržanja, ki se lahko uporablja za prosilce azila, za katere obstaja tveganje pobega, saj se prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito nikoli ne sme obravnavati kot storilce kaznivih dejanj.
As has been said repeatedly, there is a need to distinguish an administrative holding procedure, to which asylum-seekers might be subject because of a risk of absconding, from detention proper, because a person seeking international protection should never be treated like a criminal.
(18) Pridržanje prosilcev za azil bi se moralo uporabljati skladno z osnovnim načelom, da oseb ni dovoljeno pridržati zgolj zato, ker zaprosijo za mednarodno zaščito.
(18) Detention of asylum seekers should be applied in line with the underlying principle that a person should not be held in detention for the sole reason that he is seeking international protection.
Pridržanje prosilcev za azil bi bilo treba uporabljati zlasti v skladu s členom 31 Ženevske konvencije in v zelo jasno opredeljenih izjemnih okoliščinah ter z jamstvi, predpisanimi v Direktivi […/…/ES] [o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil].
In particular, detention of asylum seekers must be applied in line with Article 31 of the Geneva Convention and under the clearly defined exceptional circumstances and guarantees prescribed in Directive […/…/EC] [laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers].
Poleg tega bi morala biti uporaba pridržanja zaradi predaje v odgovorno državo članico omejena ter v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti v zvezi s sprejetimi ukrepi in zastavljenimi cilji.
Moreover, the use of detention for the purpose of transfer to the Member State responsible should be limited and subject to the principle of proportionality with regard to the means taken and objective pursued.
Pridržanje prosilcev za azil v upravnih centrih za pridržanje, ki se razlikujejo od zaporov, bi bilo treba uporabljati zlasti v skladu s členom 31 Ženevske konvencije in v zelo jasno opredeljenih izjemnih okoliščinah ter z jamstvi, predpisanimi v Direktivi […/…/ES] [o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil].
In particular, detention of asylum seekers must be applied in line with Article 31 of the Geneva Convention in administrative holding centres distinct from prison facilities and under the clearly defined exceptional circumstances and guarantees prescribed in Directive […/…/EC] [laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers].
Glej obrazložitev k predlogu spremembe 31.
See justification for Amendment 31.
(22) Ta mehanizem odložitve predaj bi bilo treba uporabljati tudi, kadar Komisija meni, da raven zaščite, zagotovljene prosilcem za mednarodno zaščito v določeni državi članici, ni v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti na področju azila, zlasti glede pogojev sprejema in dostopa do azilnega postopka, z vidika zagotavljanja, da bi bili vsi prosilci za mednarodno zaščito deležni ustrezne ravni zaščite v vseh državah članicah.
(22) This mechanism of suspension of transfers should be applied also when the Commission considers that the level of protection for applicants for international protection in a given Member State is not in conformity with Community legislation on asylum, in particular in terms of reception conditions and access to the asylum procedure, in view of ensuring that all applicants for international protection benefit from an adequate level of protection in all Member States.
(22) Ta mehanizem odložitve predaj bi bilo treba uporabljati tudi, kadar Komisija meni, da raven zaščite, zagotovljene prosilcem za mednarodno zaščito v določeni državi članici, ni v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti na področju azila, zlasti glede pogojev sprejema, izpolnjevanja pogojev za mednarodno zaščito in dostopa do azilnega postopka, z vidika zagotavljanja, da bi bili vsi prosilci za mednarodno zaščito deležni ustrezne ravni zaščite v vseh državah članicah.
(22) This mechanism of suspension of transfers should be applied also when the Commission considers that the level of protection for applicants for international protection in a given Member State is not in conformity with Community legislation on asylum, in particular in terms of reception conditions , qualification for international protection and access to the asylum procedure, with a view to ensuring that all applicants for international protection benefit from an adequate level of protection in all Member States.
(22a) Mehanizem odložitve predaj je izjemni ukrep za primere posebnega pritiska ali stalnih tveganj glede varnosti.
(22 a ) This mechanism for the suspension of transfers is an exceptional measure to address issues of particular pressure or ongoing protection concerns.
(22b) Komisija bi morala redno revidirati napredek glede izboljšanja dolgoročnega razvoja in usklajevanja skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema ter preverjati, do katere stopnje solidarnostni ukrepi in možnost mehanizma odložitve pripomorejo k napredku, o čemer bi morala tudi poročati.
(22b ) The Commission should periodically review progress toward improving the long-term development and harmonisation of the Common European Asylum System, and the degree to which solidarity measures and the availability of a suspension mechanism are facilitating that progress, and report on that progress.
Glede na to, da dublinski sistem ni namenjen temu, da bi postal mehanizem za pravično porazdelitev odgovornosti pri obravnavi prošenj za mednarodno zaščito, in da so nekatere države članice zelo izpostavljene migracijskim tokovom, še zlasti zaradi svoje geografske lege, je nujno treba razmisliti in podati predloge o zavezujočih instrumentih za zagotavljanje večje solidarnosti med državami članicami in višjih standardov zaščite .
I n view of the fact that the Dublin system was not intended to be a mechanism for equitably sharing responsibilities with regard to the examination of applications for international protection, and that a number of Member States are particularly exposed to migratory flows, in particular by virtue of their geographical location, it is essential to reflect on and propose legally binding instruments to ensure greater solidarity between Member States and higher standards of protection.
(h) „mladoletnik brez spremstva“ pomeni mladoletnika , ki pride na ozemlje držav članic brez spremstva odrasle osebe, odgovorne zanj po zakonu ali običajnem pravu, in kolikor jih taka oseba ne vzame dejansko v oskrbo; to vključuje mladoletnike, ki ostanejo brez spremstva po vstopu na ozemlje držav članic;
(h) "unaccompanied minor" means a minor who arrives in the territory of the Member States unaccompanied by an adult responsible for them whether by law or by custom, and for as long as they are not effectively taken into the care of such a person; it includes minors who are left unaccompanied after they have entered the territory of Member States;
(h) „mladoletnik brez spremstva“ pomeni mladoletnike , ki pridejo na ozemlje držav članic brez spremstva odrasle osebe, odgovorne za njih po zakonu ali običajnem pravu, in kolikor jih taka oseba ne vzame dejansko v oskrbo; to vključuje mladoletnike, ki ostanejo brez spremstva po vstopu na ozemlje držav članic;
(h) "unaccompanied minor" means a minor who arrives in the territory of the Member States unaccompanied by an adult responsible for him/her whether by law or by custom, and for as long as he/she is not effectively taken into the care of such a person; it includes minors who are left unaccompanied after they have entered the territory of Member States;
Predlog spremembe za skladnost besedila.
Amendment in view of a harmonised wording throughout the text.
Člen 2 – točka i – podtočka iii
Article 2 – point i – subpoint iii
(iii) poročene mladoletne otroke parov iz točke (i) ali prosilca, ne glede na to, ali so zakonski ali nezakonski ali posvojeni, kot je opredeljeno v nacionalni zakonodaji, če je prebivanje skupaj s prosilcem v njihovo največjo korist;
(iii) the married minor children of couples referred to in point (i) or of the applicant, regardless of whether they were born in or out of wedlock or adopted as defined under the national law, where it is in their best interests to reside with the applicant;
(iii) poročene mladoletne otroke parov iz točke (i) ali prosilca, ne glede na to, ali so zakonski ali nezakonski ali posvojeni, kot je opredeljeno v nacionalni zakonodaji, pod pogojem, da jih ne spremljajo njihovi zakonci, če je prebivanje skupaj s prosilcem v njihovo največjo korist;
(iii) the married minor children of couples referred to in point (i) or of the applicant, regardless of whether they were born in or out of wedlock or adopted as defined under the national law and provided they are not accompanied by their spouse s , where it is in their best interests to reside with the applicant;
Člen 2 – točka i – podtočka iv
Article 2 – point i – subpoint iv
(iv) očeta, mater ali skrbnika, prosilca , če je slednji mladoletna in neporočena oseba , ali če je oseba mladoletna in poročena, ampak je prebivanje skupaj z njenim očetom, materjo ali skrbnikom v njeno največjo korist ;
(iv) the father, mother or guardian of the applicant when the latter is a minor and unmarried, or when he is a minor and married but it is in his/her best interests to reside with his/her father, mother or guardian ;
(iv) očeta, mater ali skrbnika, če je prosilec mladoletna in neporočena oseba, ali če je mladoletna in poročena oseba, ki je ne spremlja njen zakonec , ampak je prebivanje skupaj z njenim očetom, materjo ali skrbnikom v njeno največjo korist;
(iv) the father, mother or guardian, when the latter is a minor and unmarried, or when he/she is a minor and married and not accompanied by his/her spouse but it is in his/her best interests to reside with his/her father, mother or guardian;
(v) mladoletne neporočene brate in sestre prosilca, če je slednji mladoletna in neporočena oseba ali če so prosilec ali njegovi mladoletni bratje in sestre mladoletne in poročene osebe, vendar je prebivanje skupaj v njihovo največjo korist.
(v) the minor unmarried siblings of the applicant, when the latter is a minor and unmarried, or when the applicant or his/her siblings are minors and married but it is in the best interests of one or more of them that they reside together;
(v) mladoletne neporočene brate in sestre prosilca, če je slednji mladoletna in neporočena oseba ali če so prosilec ali njegovi mladoletni bratje in sestre mladoletne in poročene osebe , ki jih ne spremljajo njihovi zakonci, in je prebivanje skupaj v njihovo največjo korist.
(v) the minor unmarried siblings of the applicant, when the latter is a minor and unmarried, or when the applicant or his/her siblings are minors and married and not accompanied by his/her spouse but it is in the best interests of one or more of them that they reside together;
Člen 4 – odstavek 1 – točka g
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) obstoju pravice dostopa do podatkov o prosilcu ter pravice do zahteve, da se netočni podatki o njem popravijo ali da se izbrišejo njegovi podatki, ki so bili nezakonito obdelani, vključno s pravico do obveščenosti o postopkih uveljavljanja navedenih pravic in kontaktnih podatkov nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov, ki bodo obravnavali zahtevke glede varstva osebnih podatkov.
(g) the existence of the right of access to data relating to him/her, and the right to request that inaccurate data relating to him/her be corrected or that unlawfully processed data relating to him/her be deleted, including the right to receive information on the procedures for exercising those rights and the contact details of the National Data Protection Authorities which shall hear claims concerning the protection of personal data.
(g) pravici dostopa do podatkov o prosilcu ter pravici do zahteve, da se netočni podatki o njem popravijo ali da se izbrišejo podatki o njem , ki so bili nezakonito obdelani, kot tudi o postopkih uveljavljanja navedenih pravic , vključno s kontaktnimi podatki organov iz člena 33 in nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov, ki bodo obravnavali zahtevke glede varstva osebnih podatkov.
(g) the right of access to data relating to him/her, and the right to request that inaccurate data relating to him/her be corrected or that unlawfully processed data relating to him/her be deleted, as well as the procedures for exercising those rights, including the contact details of the authorities referred to in Article 33 and of the National Data Protection Authorities which shall hear claims concerning the protection of personal data.
Treba je pojasniti, da mora biti prosilec obveščen ne le o obstoju, ampak tudi o vsebini pravice do dostopa do svojih podatkov in pravice do popravka ali izbrisa teh podatkov, ločeno pa tudi o postopkih, ki jih lahko sproži.
It should be clarified that the applicant should be informed about the content and not only the existence of the right of access to data relating to him/her and the rights to correction or erasure of data as well as, separately, on the procedural steps he/she may take.
Poleg tega navedba dodatnih kontaktnih podatkov nacionalnih organov, pristojnih za sodelovanje po dublinskem sistemu, upošteva dejstvo, da je upravljavec podatkov primarno odgovoren za sprejemanje pritožb glede zaščite osebnih podatkov.
Furthermore the addition of the contact details of the national competent authorities in charge of the Dublin cooperation takes account of the fact that the data controller is primarily responsible to hear claims concerning the protection of personal data.
Če je potrebno za prosilčevo pravilno razumevanje, se informacije zagotovi tudi ustno na razgovoru, organiziranem v skladu s členom 5.
Where necessary for the proper understanding of the applicant, the information shall also be supplied orally, at the interview organised pursuant to Article 5.
Za prosilčevo pravilno razumevanje se informacije zagotovi tudi ustno na razgovoru, organiziranem v skladu s členom 5.
For the proper understanding of the applicant, the information shall also be supplied orally, at the interview organised pursuant to Article 5.