natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če bo sprejeta, bodo potrebne ustrezne prilagoditve v celotnem besedilu.)
Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout)
Člen 3, odstavka 1 in 2
Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2
Medsektorska in sektorska merila, ki se uporabijo za ugotavljanje evropskih ključnih infrastruktur, temeljijo na obstoječih varnostnih merilih in se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 11(3).
The cross-cutting and sectoral criteria to be used to identify European Critical Infrastructures shall be based on existing protection criteria and adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 11(3).
Evropski parlament je nemudoma in izčrpno obveščen, ko Komisija Svetu predloži ukrepe ali predloge za ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti.
The European Parliament shall be fully informed without delay if the Commission submits measures, or proposals for measures to be taken, to the Council.
Sektorska merila se oblikujejo za prednostne sektorje in temeljijo na obstoječih sektorskih varnostnih ukrepih ob upoštevanju značilnosti posameznih sektorjev ključne infrastrukture in z vključevanjem vseh zadevnih zainteresiranih strani , saj ima vsak sektor posebne izkušnje in strokovno znanje ter različne zahteve glede varovanja svoje ključne infrastrukture.
The sectoral criteria shall be developed for priority sectors and be based on existing sector-based protection measures, taking into account the characteristics of individual critical infrastructure sectors and involving all relevant stakeholders , given that each sector possesses particular experience and expertise and has different requirements concerning the protection of their critical infrastructure.
Prihodnji sektorski ukrepi bi morali upoštevati to direktivo zaradi preprečevanja možnega podvajanja ali navzkrižja.
Future sectoral measures shall take account of this Directive in order to avoid possible duplication or contradiction.
Prednostne sektorje, ki se uporabljajo za namene oblikovanja meril, določenih v odstavku 1, se v skladu s postopkom iz člena 11(3) določi vsako leto izmed tistih, naštetih v Prilogi I.
The priority sectors to be used for the purposes of developing the criteria provided for in paragraph 1 shall be identified in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 11(3) on an annual basis from among those listed in Annex I.
Na podlagi priglasitev v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 3(3) in katerih koli drugih informacij, ki so na voljo, Komisija predlaga seznam ključnih infrastruktur, ki se določijo za evropske ključne infrastrukture.
On the basis of the notifications made pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 3(3) and any other information at its disposal, the Commission shall propose a list of critical infrastructures to be designated as European Critical Infrastructures.
Komisija nemudoma in izčrpno obvesti Evropski parlament o tem seznamu.
The Commission shall fully inform the European Parliament without delay of the details of this list.
Vsaka država članica Komisiji poroča na podlagi povzetka o vrstah šibkih točk, tveganj in groženj, ugotovljenih v vsakem sektorju, navedenem v Prilogi I, v roku 18 mesecev po sprejetju seznama iz člena 4(2) in zatem vsaki dve leti.
Each Member State shall report to the Commission on a summary basis on the types of vulnerabilities, threats and risks encountered in each sector referred to in Annex I within 18 months following the adoption of the list provided for in Article 4(2) and thereafter on an ongoing basis every two years
Vsaka država članica Komisiji poroča na podlagi povzetka o vrstah šibkih točk, tveganj in groženj, ugotovljenih v vsakem sektorju, navedenem v Prilogi I, v roku 12 mesecev po sprejetju seznama iz člena 4(2) in zatem vsaki dve leti.
Each Member State shall report to the Commission on a summary basis on the types of vulnerabilities, threats and risks encountered in each sector referred to in Annex I within 12 months following the adoption of the list provided for in Article 4(2) and thereafter on an ongoing basis every two years
Predlog spremembe uvaja skrajšanje postopka.
Shortens the procedure.
V skladu s postopkom iz člena 11(3) in ob udeležbi zadevnih strani se lahko oblikujejo skupne metodologije za izvedbo ocen šibkih točk, tveganj in groženj glede evropskih ključnih infrastruktur na podlagi posameznega sektorja.
Common methodologies for carrying out vulnerability, threat and risk assessments in respect of European Critical Infrastructures may be developed on a sectoral basis in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 11(3) and with the participation of those concerned .
Komisija usklajeno z državami članicami podpira lastnike/upravljavce določenih evropskih ključnih infrastruktur z zagotavljanjem dostopa do podatkov in izmenjave najboljših izkušenj , praks in metodologij, povezanih z varovanjem ključne infrastrukture.
The Commission shall, in coordination with the Member States, support the owners/operators of designated European Critical Infrastructures by providing access to information and exchanges of proven experience , practices and methodologies related to critical infrastructure protection.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se informacije o varovanju evropske ključne infrastrukture, posredovane državam članicam ali Komisiji, uporabijo izključno za namen varovanja evropskih ključnih infrastruktur.
Member States shall ensure that European Critical Infrastructure Protection Information submitted to the Member States or to the Commission, is not used for any purpose other than the protection of European critical infrastructures.
Komisiji pomaga Odbor, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki vseh držav članic .
The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee composed of a representative of each Member State .
Upoštevanje načela subsidiarnosti .
Consideration of the subsidiarity principle.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 1. julija 2008 .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 1 July 2008 at the latest.
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem
OPINION of the Committee on TRANSPORT AND TOURISM
Evropski svet je junija 2004, kmalu po napadih na vlake v Madridu, Komisijo pozval k pripravi celovite strategije za varovanje ključne infrastrukture pred terorističnimi dejanji.
In June 2004, shortly after the train bombings in Madrid, the European Council instructed the Commission to prepare an overall strategy to protect critical infrastructure from acts of terrorism.
Komisija je tako novembra 2005 sprejela Zeleno knjigo o evropskem programu za varovanje ključne infrastrukture, v kateri so predstavljene možnosti za oblikovanje evropskega programa za varovanje ključne infrastrukture (EPCIP) in informacijskega omrežja za opozarjanje o ključni infrastrukturi (CIWIN).
This led in November 2005 to the Commission Green Paper on a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP), setting out potential strategies for implementing EPCIP and for a Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN).
Decembra 2005 je Svet za pravosodje in notranje zadeve Komisijo pozval, naj do junija 2006 pripravi predlog EPCIP.
In December 2005 the Council of Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs instructed the Commission to submit a proposal on EPCIP no later than June 2006.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu o EPCIP iz decembra 2006 kot okvir tega programa predvidela več sestavnih delov; enega od njih predstavlja pričujoči osnutek direktive, v katerem je vsebovan postopek o ugotavljanju in določanju evropske ključne infrastrukture, katere varovanje je treba izboljšati.
The Commission’s December 2006 communication on EPCIP sets out a number of elements which the framework of such a programme might comprise including, this proposal for a directive containing a procedure for the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure in need of improved protection.
Direktiva naj bi dopolnila obstoječe nacionalne programe za varovanje pomembne infrastrukture ter nadgradila obstoječe sektorske ukrepe za varovanje ključne infrastrukture (SKI).
This directive is intended to complement existing national programmes on the protection of important infrastructures and to be built on existing Critical Infrastructure sector-based measures.
Komisija predlaga, naj se infrastruktura šteje za ključno, če bi njena okvara ali uničenje vplivala na dve ali več držav članic ali na drugo državo članico, v kateri se ne nahaja.
The Commission proposes that an infrastructure should be a designated as a European Critical Infrastructure if its disruption or destruction would affect two or more Member States, or a single Member State if the critical infrastructure is located in another Member State.
Vsaka država članica bi morala določiti in Komisiji sporočiti evropsko ključno infrastrukturo na svojem ozemlju in tisto ključno infrastrukturi zunaj svojega ozemlja, ki bi nanj lahko vplivala.
Each Member State should identify European Critical Infrastructure (ECI) located within its territory as well as critical infrastructures outside its territory that may have an impact on it, and notify such the Commission of such infrastructures.
Na tej osnovi namerava Komisija v postopku komitologije pripraviti konkreten seznam evropske ključne infrastrukture.
On this basis the Commission intends to draw up centrally, under the comitology procedure, a specific list of European Critical Infrastructures.
Poleg osnutka direktive o ugotavljanju in določanju evropske ključne infrastrukture bodo še vedno veljali obstoječi sektorski predpisi.
Alongside this proposal for a directive on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure, existing sector-specific legislation will remain in force.
V transportnem sektorju, na primer, že obstajajo zakonske določbe o varnosti, med drugim za ladje in pristanišča, letališča, civilno letalstvo in prevoz nevarnega blaga.
In the transport sector, for example, security legislation already exists, e.g. for vessels and port facilities, airports, civil aviation and the transport of dangerous goods.
Predlogi sprememb, ki jih vlaga poročevalka
Rapporteur’s amendments
Poročevalka meni, da je Komisija s tem osnutkom direktive prekoračila svoja pooblastila, kajti pri razumevanju svoje naloge je izhajala iz napačnih predpostavk, stremi pa k cilju, ki krši načelo subsidiarnosti.
Your rapporteur believes that, with this proposal for a directive, the Commission is exceeding its powers, misunderstanding its instructions and seeking to achieve an objective which contravenes the subsidiarity principle.
Pobuda o varovanju ključne infrastrukture bi morala zagotavljati notranjo varnost.
The initiative on the protection of critical infrastructure is intended to guarantee internal security.
To ni pobuda za ohranjanje stabilnosti notranjega trga.
It is not an initiative to protect the stability of the Internal Market.
Očitno želi Komisija v nasprotju s svojo nalogo, ki je dopolniti obstoječe ukrepe držav članic, le-te nadomestiti.
Rather than complementing the measures of the Member States, which is its real task, the Commission clearly wishes to replace the Member States’ existing measures.
Predlagani sistem poročanja ustvarja nove birokratske ovire.
The proposed system of reporting requirements creates additional and counter-productive bureaucratic structures.
Poročevalka meni, da bi morale ključno infrastrukturo ugotoviti in določiti izključno države članice.
Your rapporteur considers that critical infrastructures should be identified and designated solely by the Member States.
Ne strinja se z dolžnostjo dajanja informacij držav članic Komisiji v zvezi s sporočanjem konkretne ključne infrastrukture.
She opposes the requirement for the Member States to notify the Commission of specific critical infrastructures.
To bi nasprotovalo nacionalnim varnostnim interesom, saj bi bil evropski seznam ključne infrastrukture zanimiv vir informacij za teroriste.
This would be against national security interests, since a European list of critical infrastructures would be an interesting source of information to terrorists.
Potencialno nevarnost lahko zmanjša le decentralistično upravljanje evropske ključne infrastrukture v državah članicah.
In order to reduce the level of risk the only appropriate measure would seem to be devolved management of ECI in the Member States.
Za ključno evropsko infrastrukturo velja le tista, katere okvara ali uničenje vpliva na vsaj tri države članice ali na dve drugi državi članici, v katerih se ključna infrastruktura ne nahaja.
The only infrastructures which should be regarded as critical from a European point of view are those whose disruption or destruction would affect at least three Member States, or two Member States other than the one in which they are located.
Ravno tako bi bilo treba na ravni Komisije opredeliti in popisati le ogrožene evropske prednostne sektorje ter postaviti osnovna merila, ki upoštevajo pomen infrastrukture za zagotavljanje varnosti prebivalstva.
Furthermore, all that should be done centrally by the Commission is to define and list in general terms the European priority sectors at risk, and to draw up fundamental criteria based on the importance of the infrastructure to the security (of supply) of the population.
Pri odločanju, ali je neka infrastruktura ključna ali ne, je treba upoštevati tudi „človeški faktor“.
In deciding whether an infrastructure is critical, the “human factor” must therefore be taken into consideration.
Zajemati bi moral tudi tunele, mostove, železniške postaje, zapornice, pristanišča in letališča.
This clarification should include tunnels, bridges, stations, locks, ports and airports.
Odbor za promet in turizem poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, naj kot pristojni odbor predlaga zavrnitev predloga Komisije.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
o strategiji za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja
on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................11
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 11
o strategiji za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja
on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, podpisanega 16. decembra 2003
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement on better lawmaking, signed on 16 December 2003
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2000 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu: „Boljša priprava zakonodaje 1998: skupna odgovornost“ in „Boljša priprava zakonodaje 1999“
– having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2000 on the Commission reports to the European Council: Better lawmaking - A shared responsibility (1998) and Better lawmaking 1999
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. novembra 2001 o beli knjigi Komisije o evropskem javnem upravljanju
– having regard to its resolution of 29 November 2001 on the Commission White Paper on European governance
UL C 153 E z dne 27.6.2002, str.
OJ C 153 E, 27.6.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. aprila 2003 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2000 oziroma boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2001
– having regard to its resolution of 8 April 2003 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled ‘Better lawmaking 2000’ and ‘Better lawmaking 2001’
4 UL C 64 E z dne 12.3.2004, str.
OJ C 64 E, 12.3.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. februarja 2004 o poročilu Komisije o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2002
– having regard to its resolution of 26 February 2004 on the Commission report entitled ‘Better Lawmaking 2002’
5 UL C 98 E z dne 23.4.2004, str.
OJ C 98 E, 23.4.2004, p.
6 UL C 102 E z dne 28.4.2004, str.
OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p.
7 UL C 104 E z dne 30.4.2004, str.
OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
8 UL C 297 E z dne 7.12.2006, str.
OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2004 – uporaba načela subsidiarnosti (dvanajsto letno poročilo)
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on ‘Better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity’ (12th annual report)
9 UL C 297 E z dne 7.12.2006, str.
OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o izidih pregleda zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo zakonodajalca
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator
10 UL C 297 E z dne 7.12.2006, str.
OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 14. novembra 2006 z naslovom: „Prvo poročilo o napredku glede strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja“ ( KOM(2006)0690 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document of 14 November 2006 entitled ‘First progress report on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’ ( COM(2006)0690 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6‑0271/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0271/2007 ) and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,
A. ker si Komisija, Svet in Evropski parlament sistematično prizadevajo za izvajanje, opredelitev in izboljšanje uporabe instrumentov za poenostavitev zakonodaje,
A. having regard to the current unstinting and systematic commitment by the Commission, the Council and Parliament to bring about, define and improve the application of legislative simplification tools,
B. ker je poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja z namenom zagotavljanja jasnosti, učinkovitosti in kakovosti zakonodaje predpogoj za doseganje cilja „izboljšanja priprave zakonodaje“, ki je ena od prednostnih nalog Evropske unije in katere cilj je zagotoviti visoko raven rasti in zaposlovanja,
B. whereas simplifying the legislative environment to ensure the clarity, efficacy and quality of legislation is an essential prerequisite for attaining the objective of ‘better lawmaking’, which, in turn, is a priority for the Union with a view to securing high levels of growth and employment,
C. ker je eden od ključnih dosežkov poenostavitve njena postopna razširitev na vsa področja zakonodaje Evropske skupnosti,
C. whereas one of the main results of simplification is its progressive coverage of all EC regulatory areas,
D. ob upoštevanju obveznosti in ciljev, predvidenih v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, predvsem obveznosti in ciljev v zvezi s poenostavitvijo in zmanjšanjem obsega zakonodaje Skupnosti ter vplivom te zakonodaje v državah članicah,
D. having regard to the obligations and aims laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, especially those intended to simplify and reduce the volume of Community legislation and those relating to the impact of that legislation in the Member States,
E. ker je omenjeni delovni dokument Komisije nadaljevanje in uresničitev sporočila Komisije z dne 25. oktobra 2005 z naslovom: „Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja“ ( KOM(2005)0535 ),
E. whereas the above-mentioned Commission working document is a follow-up to, and implements, the Commission communication of 25 October 2005 entitled ‘Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’ ( COM(2005)0535 ),
F. ker omenjeni delovni dokument vsebuje nov tekoč program poenostavitve za obdobje 2006–2009 z napovedjo ukrepov za poenostavitev oblike, ki zajemajo 43 prenovitev, 12 kodifikacij in 8 razveljavitev, ter drugih 46 ukrepov za poenostavitev vsebine, ki se običajno opredeljujejo kot revizije,
F. whereas the above-mentioned working document sets out a new ‘simplification rolling programme’ covering the period 2006-2009, in which measures are announced to simplify form, based on 43 recasts, 12 codifications and 8 repeals, in addition to 46 other measures to simplify substance, generally defined as cases of ‘revision’,
G. ker je bilo prejšnjim ukrepom poenostavitve dodanih še približno 500 novih zakonodajnih pobud (od katerih 200 v letu 2007) iz ločenega tekočega programa, ki je posebej posvečen kodifikacijam,
G. whereas in addition to the above simplification measures, some 500 new legislative initiatives (some 200 of which in 2007 alone) have been included in a separate rolling programme specifically dedicated to codifications,
H. ker je Komisija pojasnila, da ostaja program kodifikacije okviren, saj je odvisen od dostopnosti aktov, ki jih je treba kodificirati, v vseh jezikih, in ker je po besedah Komisije treba kodifikacijo prestaviti, kadar so predvidene nove spremembe teh aktov, iz česar sledi, da se po mnenju Komisije vrstni red za predložitev kodifikacij, navedenih v tekočem programu, lahko spremeni glede na ta dva dejavnika,
H. whereas the Commission points out that the codification programme remains indicative, since it depends on the availability in all languages of the acts to be codified and whereas, according to the Commission, codification should be postponed when new amendments of these acts are envisaged, with the result that, in the Commission’s view, the order of acts in the rolling programme might change in the light of these two factors,
I. ker Komisija v omenjenem delovnem dokumentu predlaga okrepitev prakse uvajanja uvodnega obrazložitvenega memoranduma v predloge, ki jih oblikuje, da bi lahko bolje obrazložila cilje poenostavitve,
I. whereas, in the above-mentioned working document, the Commission proposes increasing the practice of including in its proposals an initial explanatory memorandum in order better to explain the simplification objectives pursued,
J. ker so homogeni sklop metodologij, izboljšan na podlagi posvetovanj z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi in izvedbe sektorskih analiz, sodelovanje med Komisijo, Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom, pa tudi obširnejša uporaba samoregulacije in koregulacije dejavniki uspešnosti pri pobudah za poenostavitev,
J. whereas the success factors for achieving the simplification goals include a solid set of methodologies, which has improved thanks to consultation with all interested parties and to the development of sector-specific analyses, close cooperation between the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council and an increasing use of self-regulation and co-regulation,
1. poziva Komisijo, da se bolj posveča izvajanju, uporabi in ocenjevanju zakonodaje Skupnosti kot bistvenemu delu postopka za boljšo pravno ureditev;
Urges the Commission to put more emphasis on implementation, enforcement and evaluation of Community legislation, as an essential part of the ‘better regulation’ process;
5. odobrava prizadevanja Komisije za okrepitev dejavnosti kodifikacije pravnega reda Skupnosti kot osnovne in temeljne oblike poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja;
Welcomes the efforts made by the Commission to step up the activity of codifying the Community acquis as a primary and fundamental way of simplifying the regulatory environment;
7. predlaga, naj Komisija enkrat za vselej sprejme prenovitev kot običajno zakonodajno tehniko, kar bo omogočilo, da bo za vsako pobudo na voljo celotno besedilo, tudi kadar bodo prisotne specifične spremembe, z jasno navedbo novih in nespremenjenih delov, s čemer bo zagotovljena čitljivost in večja preglednost zakonodaje Skupnosti;
Proposes that the Commission once and for all adopt recasting as a standard legislative technique so that, for each initiative, the text can be available in its entirety, also where there are specific amendments, providing a clear indication of the new parts and those which are unchanged, thereby increasing the legibility and transparency of Community legislation;