natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2. priznava, da so horizontalni sporazumi, ki obstoječe dvostranske sporazume usklajujejo s pravom Skupnosti, potrebni za zagotavljanje pravne varnosti, poleg tega pa omogočajo tudi poenostavitev in vsem letalskim prevoznikom iz Unije zagotavljajo enake pravice;
Recognises that horizontal agreements, aligning existing bilateral agreements with Community law, are necessary to ensure legal certainty and provide additional benefits in terms of simplification and the assurance that all Union airlines will enjoy the same rights;
4. obžaluje, da Svet Komisiji še ni podelil mandata za pogajanja o celovitem sporazumu o zračnem prometu s pomembnimi trgovinskimi partnerji, kot sta Ljudska republika Kitajska in Indija; meni, da to vse bolj škoduje interesom Unije, zlasti glede na hitro rast teh gospodarstev;
Regrets that the Council has yet to grant the Commission a mandate to negotiate a comprehensive air agreement with important trading partners such as the People’s Republic of China and India; considers that this failure is becoming increasingly harmful to Union interests, particularly given the rapid growth of these economies;
Merila za ocenjevanje sporazuma
Criteria for assessing an agreement
9. meni, da mora sporazum nujno vsebovati svetovne standarde za varovanje podatkov in zasebnosti ter da so merila, ki jih je Parlament opredelil v svoji resoluciji z dne 5. maja 2010, ustrezen model za tak dogovor; poudarja, da bi Evropska unija morala imeti vodilno vlogo pri razvoju takih mednarodnih standardov;
Considers that worldwide standards for data protection and privacy are urgently required, and that the criteria set out by Parliament in its resolution of 5 May 2010 provide an appropriate model for such an agreement; points out that the Union should play a pioneering role in the development of such worldwide standards;
12. poziva Komisijo, naj sporazume o zračnem prometu uporabi za spodbujanje skladnosti z ustrezno mednarodno zakonodajo o socialnih pravicah, zlasti z delovnimi standardi, vključenimi v temeljne konvencije Mednarodne organizacije dela (ILO 1930–1999), s smernicami OECD za večnacionalne družbe (1976, revidiranimi 2000) in z Rimsko konvencijo o uporabi prava v pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih (1980);
Calls on the Commission to use air agreements to promote compliance with relevant international legislation on social rights, in particular the labour standards enshrined in the fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO 1930-1999), the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976, revised 2000) and the 1980 Rome Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations;
17. opozarja, da je treba zgoraj navedene informacije v skladu s členom 24 okvirnega sporazuma posredovati Parlamentu takó, da lahko ta po potrebi poda svoje mnenje; odločno poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu poroča, kako so bila njegova mnenja upoštevana;
Points out that, pursuant to Article 24 of the Framework Agreement, the information mentioned above must be forwarded to Parliament in such a way that, if necessary, it can deliver an opinion; strongly urges the Commission to report back to Parliament on how its opinions are taken into account;
21. poziva Komisijo, naj zaradi nadaljnjega pretoka informacij Parlamentu redno in najmanj vsaka tri leta predloži poročilo z analizo prednosti in pomanjkljivosti veljavnih sporazumov; poudarja, da bo Parlament na podlagi teh poročil lahko učinkoviteje ocenil prihodnje sporazume;
Calls on the Commission, with a view to maintaining the flow of information, to submit reports to Parliament regularly, and no less frequently than every three years, analysing the strengths and weaknesses of existing agreements; points out that this would enable Parliament to assess future agreements more effectively;
Z Lizbonsko pogodbo, ki je začela veljati 1. decembra 2009, se je povečalo število primerov, ko je za sklenitev mednarodnega sporazuma potrebna odobritev Parlamenta.
The Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, extended the circumstances in which Parliament’s consent was required for the conclusion of an international agreement.
Prej je imel Parlament pri takih sporazumih le posvetovalno vlogo.
Previously Parliament had only been consulted on such agreements.
V luči te spremembe je Odbor za promet in turizem sklenil pripraviti samoiniciativno poročilo, da bi podal nekatera splošna načela glede ocenjevanja sporazumov o zračnem prometu tako z vidika vsebine kot z vidika postopkov, ki jih lahko uvede Odbor, da zagotovi, da bi bil ves čas pogajanj dobro obveščen in bi imel možnost izraziti svoje prednostne cilje že veliko pred odločitvijo o odobritvi.
In view of this change, the Committee on Transport and Tourism decided to draw up an own-initiative report with the aim of setting out some general principles regarding how air agreements should be evaluated both in terms of substance and the procedures the Committee might adopt to ensure that it was well-informed throughout the course of negotiations and has an opportunity to express its priorities well before being confronted with the yes/no choice of consent.
Vrste sporazumov
Types of Agreement
Sporazume o zračnem prometu lahko razdelimo v tri velike skupine:
It is possible to distinguish three broad categories of air agreement:
· horizontalni sporazumi , ki obstoječe dvostranske sporazume o zračnem prometu med državami članicami in tretjimi državami usklajujejo z zakonodajo Skupnosti;
· horizontal agreements which align existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and a given third country with Community law;
· celoviti sporazumi s sosednjimi državami ali svetovnimi partnerji, katerih namen je zagotavljati pošteno konkurenco ter podpreti reformo mednarodnega civilnega letalskega prometa, obenem pa promovirati evropske predpise in industrijo;
· comprehensive agreements with neighbouring countries or global partners which seek to ensure fair competition and help to reform international civil aviation while promoting European regulations and industry;
· sporazumi o varnosti , ki so namenjeni zagotavljanju visoke ravni varnosti v civilnem letalstvu po vsem svetu ter omejevanju gospodarskih bremen z odpravo nepotrebnega podvajanja nadzora.
· safety agreements which are intended to ensure a high level of civil aviation safety worldwide and to minimize economic burdens by eliminating unnecessary duplicate checks.
Obstaja splošen konsenz, da so sporazumi o zračnem prometu s tretjimi državami na splošno pozitivni.
There is a broad consensus that air agreements with third countries are generally positive.
Jasno je, da so horizontalni sporazumi, ki izvajajo sodbo Evropskega sodišča z dne 5. novembra 2002
Clearly the horizontal agreements, implementing the Court of Justice’s ruling of 5 November 2002
Zadeva C-466/98. , potrebni za zagotavljanje pravne varnosti.
Case C-466/98 , are necessary to ensure legal certainty.
Zagotavljajo tudi enake pravice vsem letalskim prevoznikom v Uniji, obenem pa poenostavljajo prejšnjo mrežo sporazumov posameznih držav članic.
They also guarantee the same rights to all Union airlines while simplifying the previous web of individual Member State agreements;
Podobno so lahko celoviti sporazumi s sosednjimi državami ali pomembnimi svetovnimi partnerji zalo koristni, saj lahko potnikom in prevoznikom tovora zagotovijo boljše storitve v smislu raznolikosti in stroškov, obenem pa letalskim prevoznikom omogočajo nove priložnosti in konkurenčno prednost.
Equally the comprehensive agreements with neighbouring countries or significant global partners can provide substantial benefits by offering passengers and freight operators improved services – in terms of both variety and cost – while allowing airlines new opportunities and a competitive edge.
Poleg tega lahko zbliževanje predpisov veliko prispeva k spodbujanju poštene konkurence, zlasti glede državnih subvencij ter socialnih in okoljskih standardov.
In addition, regulatory convergence can do much to promote fair competition, particularly with regard to State subsidies, social and environmental standards.
V luči tega obžalujemo, da Svet kljub predlogu iz leta 2005 Komisiji še ni podelil mandata za začetek pogajanj s pomembnimi trgovinskimi partnerji v Aziji, vključno z Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko in Indijo.
In this context, it is unfortunate that the Council has yet to grant the Commission a mandate to open negotiations with important trading partners in Asia, including the People’s Republic of China and India, despite the proposal dating from 2005.
Gospodarska rast v tej regiji še povečuje vrednost takih sporazumov.
The economic growth of this region makes the value of such agreements ever more significant.
Zato mora Parlament pozvati Svet, naj prizna, da je vrednost sporazuma med Unijo in enim izmed teh gospodarstev v vzponu veliko večja, kot bi jo lahko dosegli z dvostranskimi pogajanji.
Parliament should therefore call on the Council to recognise that the value of an agreement between the Union and one of these emerging economies is much greater than what could be achieved by bilateral negotiations.
Sporazumi o varnosti zmanjšujejo podvajanje ocen, preizkusov in nadzora (razen v primeru bistvenih razlik v zakonodaji), obenem pa proizvajalcem letal iz EU in drugim pomembnim proizvajalcem omogočajo, da se lahko medsebojno zanesejo na sisteme certificiranja.
Safety agreements minimise the duplication of assessments, tests and controls (unless there are significant regulatory differences) while enabling the EU and another significant aircraft manufacturer to rely on each other’s certification systems.
To je zelo dobrodošlo, saj pripomore k zniževanju stroškov in zagotavljanju visokih standardov.
This is clearly desirable as it helps to cut costs and ensure high standards.
Čeprav so taki sporazumi na splošno dobrodošli, pa tega ne smemo pomešati z mislijo, da je vsakršen sporazum dober.
However the general desirability of such agreements should not be confused with the idea that any agreement is a good agreement.
Tako Komisija, ki je v vlogi pogajalca, kot Parlament in Svet, ki morata rezultate pogajanj potrditi, morajo presoditi, ali je določen sporazum dovolj ambiciozen in uravnotežen ali pa bi bilo bolje sklenitev sporazuma odložiti, dokler se ne doseže boljši rezultat.
Instead there is a judgement to be taken, both by the Commission as the negotiator and by Parliament and Council, as the bodies that need to approve the results of the negotiation, as to whether the agreement in question is sufficiently ambitious and balanced or whether it would be preferable to delay the agreement in search of a better outcome.
Mogoče je predvideti nekakšen seznam meril, zlasti v primeru celovitih sporazumov, s pomočjo katerih bi poročevalec, odgovoren za določen sporazum, lahko zagotovil enoten pristop k ocenjevanju različnih sporazumov.
It is possible to envisage, particularly in the case of comprehensive agreements, a type of check-list that Rapporteurs with responsibility for individual agreements might use so as to ensure a consistent approach to the evaluation of different agreements.
Takšen seznam bi lahko vključeval naslednja merila:
Such a check-list might include:
· hitrost in obseg odpiranja trga;
· the speed and extent of market opening;
· ali se omejitve vlaganj sprostijo hitro in uravnoteženo;
· whether restrictions on investment are relaxed in a timely and balanced manner;
· zagotovitev, da se usklajevanje socialnih in okoljskih standardov nagiba k partnerju z višjimi in ne k partnerju z nižjimi standardi;
· ensuring that alignment of social and environmental standards is towards the partner with the higher levels rather than the lower;
· zaščita evropskih standardov o varstvu podatkov in zasebnosti.
· safeguarding European standards on data-protection and privacy.
To pomeni zagotovitev, da je pri vseh prenosih osebnih podatkov zagotovljena potrebna zaščita za državljane EU, da se spoštujejo postopkovna jamstva in pravica do obrambe ter so skladni z zakonodajo o varstvu podatkov;
This means ensuring that all transfers of personal data should provide necessary safeguards for EU citizens, respect procedural guarantees and defence rights, and comply with data-protection legislation;
· omejitve državnih subvencij, kar zagotavlja pošteno in uravnoteženo konkurenco;
· State aid limitations which ensure fair and balanced competition;
· medsebojno priznavanje standardov zaščite in varnosti, ki bi v idealnem primeru pomenili „en varnostni pregled“ (npr. tranzitni potniki, prtljaga in tovor bi bili izvzeti iz vsakršnih nadaljnjih varnostnih ukrepov);
· mutual recognition of safety and security standards, ideally involving "one-stop security" (i.e. transfer passengers, luggage and cargo would be exempted from any additional security measures);
· usklajevanje politike pravic potnikov tako, da so zagotovljeni čim višji standardi.
· aligning passenger rights policy so as to ensure the highest possible standards.
Prav tako si je treba v primeru sporazumov o varnosti prizadevati za polno medsebojno priznavanje, tako da skladnost z veljavno zakonodajo ene pogodbenice pomeni tudi skladnost z zakonodajo druge ter da prakse in postopki certificiranja obeh pogodbenic predstavljajo enakovredno zagotovilo skladnosti.
Likewise, in the case of safety agreements, it is important to aim for full mutual recognition so that compliance with the applicable legislation of one party amounts to compliance with the legislation of the other and that the certification practices and procedures of each side provide an equivalent proof of compliance.
Da bi ohranili medsebojno zaupanje, bodo verjetno potrebni skupni inšpekcijski pregledi, preiskave, izmenjava podatkov o varnosti (pregledi zrakoplovov in podatki o nesrečah) ter okrepljeno regulativno sodelovanje in posvetovanje na tehnični ravni za reševanje zadev, preden te lahko postanejo sporne.
To maintain mutual confidence this is likely to involve joint inspections, investigations, exchange of safety data (aircraft inspections and accident related information) and increased regulatory cooperation and consultation at a technical level to solve matters before they can become "disputes".
To seveda ne pomeni, da mora vsak sporazum izpolnjevati vsa navedena merila.
Clearly this is not to say that every agreement must check off every point on the list.
Pogosto bo treba graditi zaupanje s postopnim uvajanjem elementov ali s pogajanji o nadaljnjih korakih.
It will often be necessary to build up confidence by phasing elements or negotiating successive stages.
Namen je določiti okvir, s pomočjo katerega bo mogoče oceniti posamezne sporazume.
Instead the idea is to set out a framework against which individual agreements can be assessed.
Da bi Parlament ob zaključku pogajanj lahko učinkovito odločil, ali naj sporazum odobri ali ne, mora procesu pogajanj slediti že od samega začetka.
In order to be well-placed to consider whether or not to grant consent once the negotiations have been completed, Parliament needs to follow the process from the outset.
Kot kaže izkušnja s programom za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti, je tudi v interesu Komisije in Sveta, da se vsi pomisleki, ki so dovolj pomembni, da bi lahko postavili pod vprašaj pripravljenost Parlamenta za odobritev, opredelijo in obravnavajo že v zgodnji fazi in ne šele po zaključku pogajanj.
Equally, as experience with the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program shows, it is in Commission and Council’s interest that any concerns of sufficient importance to call into question Parliament’s readiness to grant consent be identified and addressed at an early stage rather than after the negotiations have been concluded.
To pomeni, da morajo Parlament in njegovi odbori poiskati načine, da bo Komisija zanesljivo seznanjena z merili, ki jih bo Parlament uporabljal za ocenjevanje sporazumov, ter z vsemi elementi, ki bi lahko bili nesprejemljivi.
This means Parliament and its Committees should look for ways to make sure the Commission are aware the criteria it will use to evaluate an agreement and of any elements that could prove unacceptable.
Že v okvirnem sporazumu iz leta 2005 je Komisija privolila, da „Parlamentu zagotovi zgodnje in jasne informacije o mednarodnih sporazumih, tako med pripravljalno fazo takih sporazumov kot med potekom in zaključkom mednarodnih pogajanj.
Already, under the 2005 Framework Agreement, the Commission had agreed to "provide early and clear information to Parliament both during the phase of preparation of the agreements and during the conduct and conclusion of international negotiations.
V skladu s prilogo 3 revidiranega sporazuma mora Komisija (in zlasti GD MOVE) obvestiti Parlament, da namerava predlagati začetek pogajanj, mu predložiti osnutke pogajalskih smernic, osnutke predlogov sprememb, osnutke pogajalskih besedil, člene, o katerih je bil dosežen dogovor, datum za parafiranje in besedilo sporazuma, ki bo parafiran, skupaj z vsemi zadevnimi dokumenti in informacijami o morebitni odložitvi izvajanja ali spremembah sporazuma.
In line with annex 3 of this revised agreement, the Commission (in particular DG MOVE) should inform Parliament about its intention to propose negotiations, provide the draft negotiating directives, the draft amendments, draft negotiating texts, agreed articles, date for initialling and text of the agreement to be initialled together with other relevant documents and information about any possible suspension or modification of agreements.
Kot doslej bi lahko Odbor za promet in turizem pripravil redne informativne seje za zaprtimi vrati s pogajalci GD MOVE, kar bi poslancem, najtesneje povezanim z obravnavano tematiko, omogočilo vpogled v trenutno stanje pogajanj, obenem pa bi bila zagotovljena zaupnost informacij.
As has been done in the past, the Committee on Transport and Tourism could organise periodic, in camera , oral briefings from DG MOVE’s negotiators that would enable the Members most closely involved in the topics under discussion to discover the current state of the negotiations while respecting the confidential nature of the information.
Prav tako so potrebni ustrezni ukrepi, da bi bili dokumenti občutljive narave na voljo le tistim, ki jih potrebujejo pri svojem delu, in pod pogojem, da se spoštuje interna narava dokumenta.
Equally, appropriate measures would be required to ensure that sensitive documents were only made available to those with a working need for the material and on the understanding that the restricted nature of the document would be respected.
Poslovnik Parlamentu dopušča, da na plenarnem zasedanju „na podlagi poročila pristojnega odbora […] sprejme priporočila in zahteva, da se upoštevajo pred sklenitvijo mednarodnega sporazuma“ (člen 90, odstavek 4).
Parliament’s own Rules of Procedure allows Plenary "on the basis of a report from the committee responsible [to] adopt recommendations and require them to be taken into account before the conclusion of the international agreement under consideration” (rule 90 paragraph 5).
Poleg tega člen 81(3) pristojnemu odboru omogoča, da „za vzpodbujanje pozitivnega izida postopka Parlamentu predloži vmesno poročilo o predlogu s predlogom resolucije, ki vsebuje priporočila za spremembo ali izvršitev predlaganega akta.“
In addition, rule 81 paragraph 3 allows the responsible Committee "in the interests of achieving a positive outcome of the procedure, to present an interim report on the proposal to Parliament including a motion for a resolution containing recommendations for modification or implementation of the proposed act."
Na tej točki ostaja odprto vprašanje, v kolikšni meri bi Odbor za promet in turizem želel uresničevati ta formalna pooblastila.
At this stage, the extent to which the Committee on Transport and Tourism would wish to make use of these formal powers remains to be seen.
Veliko bo odvisno od tega, v kolikšni meri bo mogoče ohraniti in okrepiti obstoječi konstruktivni dialog med odborom in GD MOVE.
Much will depend on the extent to which it is possible to maintain and enhance the existing constructive dialogue between the Committee and DG MOVE.
V takih okoliščinah bi bilo pri posredovanju prednostnih ciljev ali pomislekov poslancev morda bolje dati prednost manj formalnim potem.
In such circumstances it may well be preferable to give priority to more informal channels when conveying Members’ priorities or concerns.
Vendar pa bi bilo v določenih situacijah zaradi političnega pomena določenega sporazuma ali vprašanj, ki jih sproža, morda zaželeno, da Parlament na plenarnem zasedanju sprejme jasno stališče.
Nevertheless there may be situations in which, in view of the political significance of the agreement in question or the issues that it raises, a clear position adopted by Plenary would be desirable.
Nove pristojnosti Parlamenta, ki jih uvaja Lizbonska pogodba, prinašajo s seboj tudi novo odgovornost, da sta Parlament in njegov pristojni odbor dobro obveščena o pripravi sporazumov, ki jih bo moral Parlament kasneje odobriti.
The new Parliamentary powers established by the Treaty of Lisbon bring with them new responsibilities to ensure that Parliament and its responsible Committee are well informed about the preparation of the agreements to which it will subsequently be asked to give its consent.
To je povezano tudi z nalogo natančnejšega spremljanja poteka pogajanj.
This implies a corresponding responsibility to monitor the conduct of negotiations more closely.
Medtem ko se bo natančen mehanizem za učinkovito opravljanje te naloge od sporazuma do sporazuma razlikoval, pa lahko zgoraj navedene možnosti razumemo kot nabor elementov, ki jih lahko uporabimo glede na specifične okoliščine posameznega sporazuma.
While the precise mechanisms for undertaking this task efficiently and effectively will differ from agreement to agreement, the possibilities identified above can be seen as forming a menu elements of which can be adopted according to the particular circumstances of each agreement.
Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Ville Itälä, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Kumucakos (Georgios Koumoutsakos), Werner Kuhn, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Gesine Meissner, Hella Ranner, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Olga Sehnalová, Debora Serracchiani, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Peter van Dalen, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Ville Itälä, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Werner Kuhn, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Gesine Meissner, Hella Ranner, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Olga Sehnalová, Debora Serracchiani, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Peter van Dalen, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Philip Bradbourn, Spiros Danelis (Spyros Danellis), Isabelle Durant, Tanja Fajon, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Dominique Riquet, Alfreds Rubiks, Sabine Wils
Philip Bradbourn, Spyros Danellis, Isabelle Durant, Tanja Fajon, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Dominique Riquet, Alfreds Rubiks, Sabine Wils
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 97/68/ES glede določb za motorje, dane na trg v okviru sistema prožnosti
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 97/68/EC as regards the provisions for engines placed on the market under the flexibility scheme
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................24
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ................................25
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 97/68/ES glede določb za motorje, dane na trg v okviru sistema prožnosti( KOM(2010)0362 – C7
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 97/68/EC as regards the provisions for engines placed on the market under the flexibility scheme