natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Povedati je treba, da odbor za razvojno pomoč Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj v svojih smernicah za poročanje v sistemu za poročanje držav upnic (DCD/DAC(2002)21) opredeljuje uradno razvojno pomoč kot finančne tokove, usmerjene k državam s seznama prejemnikov te pomoči, ki ga ta odbor pripravi, za katere med drugim velja, da je pri izvedbi vsake transakcije glavni cilj spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja in blaginje držav v razvoju.
It should be noted that in its 'Reporting Directives for the Creditor Reporting System' (DCD/DAC(2002)21), the OECD/DAC defines ODA as financial flows to countries on the DAC list of ODA recipients for which, inter alia, "each transaction is administered with the promotion of the economic development and welfare of developing countries as its main objective",
Člen 11(2) uredbe določa tako:
Article 11(2) of the Regulation provides as follows:
Ukrepi, ki se izvajajo v okviru tematskih programov, v skladu s splošnim namenom in področjem uporabe, cilji in splošnimi načeli te uredbe prispevajo dodano vrednost ukrepom, financiranim v okviru geografskih programov, ter jih dopolnjujejo in so z njimi usklajeni.
Consistently with the overall purpose and scope, objectives and general principles of this Regulation, the actions undertaken through thematic programmes shall add value to and be additional to, and coherent with, actions funded under geographic programmes.
Za te ukrepe veljajo naslednja načela:
The following principles shall apply to these actions:
(a) Ciljev politike Skupnosti ni mogoče ustrezno ali učinkovito doseči v okviru geografskih programov in tematski program se izvaja s strani ali prek posredniške organizacije, na primer nevladnih organizacij, drugih nedržavnih akterjev, mednarodnih organizacij ali večstranskih mehanizmov.
(a) Community policy objectives cannot be achieved in an appropriate or effective manner through geographic programmes and the thematic programme is implemented by or through an intermediary organisation such as nongovernmental organisations, other non-State actors, international organisations or multilateral mechanisms.
To vključuje svetovne pobude v podporo razvojnim ciljem tisočletja, trajnostnemu razvoju ali globalnim javnim dobrinam ter ukrepe v državah članicah in pristopnih državah, in sicer z odstopanjem od člena 24, kakor je predvideno v ustreznem tematskem programu, in/ali
This includes global initiatives supporting the MDGs, sustainable development or global public goods and actions in Member States and acceding countries by way of derogation from Article 24 as envisaged in the relevant thematic programme, and/or
(b) ukrepi imajo značaj:
(b) actions are of the following nature:
– ukrepov, ki zadevajo več regij in/ali več področij,
— multi-regional and/or cross-cutting actions, including
vključno s pilotnimi projekti in inovativnimi politikami;
pilot projects and innovatory policies;
– ukrepanja v primerih, če se s partnersko(-imi) vlado(-ami) ne doseže dogovor glede ukrepa;
— actions in cases where there is no agreement on the action with the partner government(s);
– ukrepov, ki ustrezajo namenu posebnega tematskega programa in so odziv na prednostno nalogo politike Skupnosti oziroma mednarodno obveznost ali zavezo Skupnosti;
— actions relevant to the purpose of a specific thematic programme which respond to a Community policy priority or an international obligation or commitment of the Community;
– kjer je to ustrezno, ukrepanja v primerih, da geografski program ne obstaja ali je bil prekinjen.
— where appropriate, actions in cases where there is no geographic programme or it has been suspended.
V letu 2007 je Odbor za razvoj opredelil številne ukrepe, katerih namen je financiranje v okviru geografskih programov, ki niso izpolnjevali zahtev iz člena 2(4) uredbe.
In the course of 2007, the Development Committee identified a number of actions intended to be financed under geographic programmes which did not meet the requirements set out in Article 2(4) of the Regulation.
Ukrepi so bili navedeni v nizu resolucij, ki so tu naštete:
The actions in question where identified in a series of resolutions as follows:
Resolucija z dne 15. februarja 2007 o osnutku sklepov Komisije o pripravi strateških dokumentov držav in okvirnih programov za Malezijo, Brazilijo in Pakistan:
Resolution of 15 February 2007 on the draft Commission decisions establishing Country Strategy Papers and Indicative Programmes for Malaysia, Brazil and Pakistan:
3. meni, da je Komisija v svojem osnutku strateškega dokumenta in osnutku nacionalnega okvirnega programa 2007-2010 za Brazilijo prekoračila svoja izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, s tem, da je 70 % nacionalnega okvirnega programa pripisala Prednostni nalogi I "Krepitev dvostranskih odnosov", katere posebni cilji so: ‘i) izboljšati sektorski dialog med EU in Brazilijo o temah, ki so v skupnem interesu; ii) razširiti sodelovanje in izmenjave med ustreznimi evropskimi ter brazilskimi ustanovami in organizacijami civilne družbe; iii) okrepiti povezave med akademskimi krogi EU in Brazilije; iv) okrepiti medsebojno zavedanje med ustanovami in združenji iz EU in Brazilije, ter v okviru katere se bo financirala možnost "za spodbujanje in podporo sektorskemu dialogu o temah, ki so v skupnem interesu" in bo ustanovljen Inštitut za evropske študije, katerega glavni namen bo "povečati prepoznavnost EU" in "krepitev visokošolskih povezav"; meni, da ti cilji niso v skladu s členom 2(1) in (4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006, saj prvotni cilj strateškega dokumenta ni izkoreninjenje revščine, hkrati pa navedeni cilji ne izpolnjujejo meril za ODA, ki jih je določil OECD/DAC;
Takes the view that in its draft Strategy Paper and draft National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Brazil the Commission exceeds its implementing powers laid down in the basic act by earmarking 70% of the National Indicative Programme for Priority I ‘Enhancing Bilateral Relations’, which has as specific objectives: ‘i) [ to ] improve the sectoral dialogues between the EU and Brazil on themes of mutual interest; ii) [ to ] expand cooperation and exchanges between relevant European and Brazilian institutions and civil society organisations; iii) [ to ] strengthen links between EU and Brazilian academia; iv) [ to ] enhance mutual awareness between EU and Brazilian institutions and societies’, and under which a facility ‘to promote and support sectoral dialogues on themes of common interest’ will be financed, as well as the establishment of a European Studies Institute, with the main purpose of ‘raising the EU’s profile’ and ‘strengthening higher education links’; considers that these objectives are not in compliance with Article 2(1) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006, in that the primary objective of the Strategy Paper is not the eradication of poverty and in that the stated objectives do not fulfil the criteria for ODA established by the OECD/DAC;
V kazalu državnega strateškega dokumenta se to področje navaja kot „Protiterorizem in varnost“. nacionalnega okvirnega programa s splošnim ciljem "prispevati k prizadevanjem pakistanskih oblasti pri izvajanju resolucije Varnostnega sveta ZN 1373"
In the Country Strategy Paper's table of contents, this area is referred to as ‘Counter-terrorism and Security’. activities with the overall objective of ‘contributing to the efforts of the Pakistani authorities to implement UNSCR 1373’;
Resolucija Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1373(2001), sprejeta 28. septembra 2001, po terorističnih napadih dne 11. septembra 2001 v ZDA, vsem državam nalaga široko paleto obveznosti za preprečevanje in zatiranje financiranja terorizma, za uvedbo ustreznih kazni za kazniva dejanja terorizma, za odklonitev pribežališča teroristom in za sodelovanje z drugimi državami v kazenskih postopkih ali preiskavah, povezanih s terorističnimi dejanji. ; meni, da ta cilj ni v skladu s členom 2(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006, saj ne izpolnjuje meril za ODA, ki jih je določil OECD/DAC;
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373(2001), adopted on 28 September 2001, after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 in the USA, imposes wide-ranging obligations on all States to prevent and suppress the financing of terrorism, to establish adequate penalties for terrorist offences, to deny safe haven to terrorists and to cooperate with other States in criminal proceedings or investigations relating to terrorist acts. considers that this objective is not in compliance with Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 in that it does not fulfil the criteria for ODA established by the OECD/DAC;
Resolucija z dne 7. junija 2007 o osnutku Sklepa Komisije o pripravi regionalnih strateških dokumentov in okvirnih programov za Mercosur in Latinsko Ameriko:
Resolution of 7 June 2007 on the draft Commission decision establishing Regional Strategy Papers and Regional Indicative Programmes for Mercosur and Latin America:
1. meni, da je Komisija v svojem osnutku Regionalnega strateškega dokumenta in osnutku Regionalnega strateškega programa (2007–2010) za Latinsko Ameriko prekoračila svoja izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, s tem, da je za podpodročje svojega osrednjega področja 3 izbrala "podporo projektom s strani organizacij, ki si prizadevajo za medsebojno razumevanje med EU in Latinsko Ameriko", ter z vključitvijo posebnega cilja "podpora ... osredotočena na projekte in ukrepe, ki zadevajo razvojna vprašanja s strani organizacij, ki se ukvarjajo s spodbujanjem in analizo odnosov med EU in Latinsko Ameriko"; meni, da ta element ni v skladu s členom 2(1) in (4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006, saj prvotni cilj tega podpodročja regionalnega strateškega dokumenta ni izkoreninjenje revščine, hkrati pa ta element ne izpolnjuje meril za ODA pomoč, ki jih je določil odbor OECD/DAC;
Takes the view that in its draft Regional Strategy Paper and draft Regional Indicative Programme (2007-2010) for Latin America the Commission exceeds its implementing powers laid down in the basic act by selecting as a subsector to its Focal Sector 3 'support for projects by organisations working to promote mutual understanding between the EU and Latin America', and by including the specific objective of 'support ... targeted on projects and measures targeting development issues by organisations specialising in the promotion and analysis of relations between the EU and Latin America'; considers that this element does not comply with Article 2(1) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006, as the primary objective of this subsector of the Regional Strategy Paper is not the eradication of poverty and as this element does not fulfil the criteria for ODA established by the OECD/DAC;
– na področju krepitve kinematografskega in avdiovizualnega sektorja Mercosurja za spodbujanje regionalne integracije Komisija predlaga, da se podpre uspešna industrija s splošnim ciljem okrepiti poznavanje in zavest o regionalni identiteti ter integracijskem procesu s podpiranjem kinematografskega in avdiovizualnega sektorja;
– in the area 'strengthening of Mercosur's cinematographic and audiovisual sector to promote regional integration', the Commission proposes to support a successful industry with the general objective 'to enhance knowledge and consciousness of regional identity and the integration process through support for the cinematographic and audiovisual sector';
– na področju oblikovanja 10 študijskih centrov EU-Mercosur in podpore izvajanju načrta "Plan operativo del sector educativo del Mercosur 2006–2010" je splošni cilj opisan kot "okrepiti poznavanje in zavest o regionalnem integracijskem procesu"; eden posebnih ciljev je "podpirati ustanovitev desetih študijskih centrov EU-Mercosur na glavnih univerzah Mercosurja"; zlasti pobuda za oblikovanje evropskih/Mercosurjevih dokumentacijskih centrov, ustanovitev katedre EU in Mercosurja ter uvesti druge magistrske študijske programe o EU in Mercosurju je namenjena visoko izobraženi eliti držav Mercosurja; ker pa je to regija z najvišjim indeksom socialne neenakosti na svetu, bi načrtovani ukrepi povečali vrzel med bogatimi in revnimi, ne pa podprli revnejšega sloja prebivalstva;
– in the area 'creation of 10 EU-Mercosur study centres and support for the implementation of the Plan operativo del sector educativo del Mercosur 2006-2010', the general objective is described as 'to enhance knowledge and consciousness of the regional integration process'; one of the specific objectives is 'to support the creation of ten EU-Mercosur study centres in major Mercosur universities'; in particular, the initiative to create European/Mercosur documentation centres, to establish EU and Mercosur Study Chairs, and to create Masters' degrees in EU and Mercosur Studies is aimed at the target population of the well-educated elite of the Mercosur countries, and since this is the region with the world's highest social inequality index the planned actions would widen the gap between rich and poor rather than support the poorer strata of the population;
1. meni, da je Komisija v svojem osnutku strateškega dokumenta 2007-2013 in osnutku večletnega okvirnega programa 2007-2010 za Azijo prekoračila svoja izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, s tem, da je v osrednji sektor 1 (podpora regionalnega vključevanja) vključila naslednje elemente, ki niso v skladu s členom 2(1) in (4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006, saj njihov prvotni cilj ni izkoreninjenje revščine in ne izpolnjujejo meril za uradno razvojno pomoč, ki jih je določil Odbor za razvojno pomoč OECD:
Takes the view that, in its draft Strategy Document 2007-2013 and draft Multiannual Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Asia, the Commission exceeds its implementing powers laid down in the basic act by including in its Focal Sector 1 ('support to regional integration') the following elements, which are not in compliance with Article 2(1) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006, as the primary objective of these elements is not the eradication of poverty and they do not fulfil the criteria for ODA established by the OECD/DAC:
– na področju azijsko-evropskega srečanja ASEM, zlasti azijsko-evropskega sklada ASEF, je ena izmed navedenih prednostnih nalog spodbujanje širjenja informacij in izmenjave virov ter izboljšanje javne ozaveščenosti o ASEM in ASEF;
– in the area of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), and in particular the Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF), one of the stated priorities is to 'facilitate dissemination of information and sharing of resources and to enhance public awareness of ASEM/ASEF';
– na področju Južnoazijskega združenja za regionalno sodelovanje (SAARC) je eden izmed predlaganih programov južnoazijski program za civilno letalstvo; vanj je Komisija kot cilj vključila spodbujanje sprejemanja evropskih uredb na področju varnosti;
– in the area of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), one of the proposed programmes is the South Asia Civil Aviation Programme; in it, the Commission includes as an objective the promotion of the adoption of European safety regulations;
– na področju podpore Združenju držav jugovzhodne Azije (ASEAN) sta cilja programa za institucionalno podporo in dialog s posameznimi regijami med drugim podpora pri morebitnih pogajanjih o prostotrgovinskem sporazumu med ASEAN in EU ter izboljšanje vidnosti prispevka ES združenju ASEAN;
– in the area of support to the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN), the stated objectives of the 'institutional support and region-to-region dialogue' programme include 'support[ing] possible ASEAN-EU Free Trade Agreement negotiations and implementation' and 'rais[ing] the visibility of EC contribution to ASEAN';
– splošni cilj programa za sodelovanje in politične reforme varnostne politike na področju podpore ASEAN je tudi podpiranje sodelovanja in reforme na področju varnosti, da se vzpostavi skladnejši sistem upravljanja meja v izbranih glavnih vhodnih/izhodnih pristaniščih v državah članicah ASEAN.
– also in the area of support to ASEAN, the overall objective of 'cooperation and policy reform in the security field' programme is 'to support cooperation and reform in the security field, in order to develop a more coherent system of Border Management in place at selected main ports of entry/exit of the ASEAN Member Countries (...).
Konkretneje je cilj programa okrepitev zmogljivosti sistema upravljanja meja držav ASEAN na ravni regionalnega sodelovanja in na izbranih mejnih prehodih;
More specifically it is meant to strengthen the capacities of the ASEAN Border Management system both at regional cooperation level and at selected Border Crossing Points';
– na področju visokega šolstva je eden izmed specifičnih ciljev spodbujanje boljšega razumevanja evropskega visokega šolstva v azijskih državah v razvoju, predlagane dejavnosti pa so: sheme mobilnosti za študente in fakultetne profesorje, mrežno povezovanje in prenos najboljših praks med evropskimi in azijskimi univerzami ter delavnice, sejmi o visokem šolstvu, srečanja zainteresiranih strani, promocijske dejavnosti, oblikovanje delovnih dokumentov, podpiranje vzajemnega priznavanja kvalifikacij, raziskave; v programu niso navedena nobena zagotovila, da bodo študijska področja v okviru programa izbrana na podlagi razvojnih potreb v državah ali da bo program zagotovil pomoč revnejšemu prebivalstvu, ne pa še povečal vrzeli med revnimi in bogatimi, hkrati pa program tudi ne vsebuje niti posebnih določb, ki bi preprečevale beg možganov;
– in the area of 'higher education', one of the specific objectives is to 'promote better understanding of European higher education in Asian developing countries', and the proposed activities include: 'mobility schemes for students and for academics; networking and transfer of best practice between EU and Asian universities' and 'workshops, higher education fairs, stakeholders' meetings, promotional activities, production of working papers, supporting mutual recognition of qualifications, surveys'; there are no provisions to ensure that the fields of study eligible under the programme will be selected in the light of the development needs of the region, or that the selection of the beneficiaries of the programme will support the poorer strata of the population and not widen the gap between rich and poor, nor are there specific provisions to prevent a 'brain drain';
– na področju podpore raziskovalnim inštitutom je naveden cilj izboljšanja obojestranskega razumevanja, ki bo pripomoglo k razvoju te azijske regije; specifične dejavnosti so: povezovanje možganskih trustov in oblikovalcev politike iz obeh regij ter razširitev in poglobitev sklopov seminarjev in konferenc; Komisija navaja, da se bodo sredstva v ta namen dodeljevala za podporo specializiranim inštitutom, ki svoje delovanje usmerjajo na odnose med EU in Azijo, in da se bo dejavnosti osredotočilo na okrepitev raziskovalnih zmogljivosti, spodbujanje javne razprave o odnosih med Evropsko unijo in Azijo in partnerstev med azijskimi in evropskimi inštituti, možganskimi trusti in podobnimi krogi;
– in the area of 'support to research institutes', the stated objective is to 'enhance mutual understanding with a view to contributing to the development of the Asian region'; specific activities include: 'bringing together think-tanks and policy makers from both regions, broadening and intensifying the range of seminars and conferences'; the Commission states that for this purpose funds will be allocated to 'support the work of specialised institutes focusing on Asia-EU relations' and that activities will focus on strengthening research-related capacities, promoting public debate on EU-Asia relations and twinning between Asian and European institutes, think-tanks and similar circles'.
1. meni, da razvojni cilji tisočletja (RCT) niso jasno predstavljeni kakor glavna prednostna naloga v osnutku posebnega ukrepa za Irak za leto 2007; meni, da to ni v skladu s členom 2(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006, saj je tam doseganje RCT zastavljeno kakor eno od poglavitnih načel sodelovanja v okviru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje;
Takes the view that, in the draft Special Measure for Iraq for 2007, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are not clearly presented as a main priority; considers that this is not in compliance with Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 as the pursuit of the MDGs is established therein as one of the overarching principles of cooperation under the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI);
Odbor za pravne zadeve je, podprt z mnenjem pravne službe Parlamenta, na svoji seji 9. septembra 2008 soglasno
Fortified by an opinion from Parliament's Legal Service, at its meeting of 9 September 2008 the Committee on Legal Affairs decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Rainer Wieland, (podpredsednik), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (podpredsednica), Francesco Enrico Speroni (podpredsednik), (poročevalec), Ieke van den Burg, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Bert Doorn, Monica Frassoni, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Georgios Papastamkos in Daniel Strož. sklenil, da je bilo mogoče zaradi ohlapne opredelitve v členu 179 sprejeti nov instrument pomoči za države v razvoju, ki strogo vzeto ni uradna razvojna pomoč na podlagi člena 177 Pogodbe o ES.
The following were present for the final vote: Rainer Wieland, (vice-chairman), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (vice-chairwoman), Francesco Enrico Speroni (vice-chairman), (draftsman), Ieke van den Burg, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Bert Doorn, Monica Frassoni, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Georgios Papastamkos and Daniel Strož. , that given the wide definition set out in Article 179, it was possible to adopt a new instrument for assistance for developing countries which is not strictly official development assistance on the basis of Article 177 of the EC Treaty.
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (*)
o financiranju dejavnosti, ki niso uradna razvojna pomoč, za države iz uredbe št.(ES) 1905/2006
with recommendations to the Commission on the financing of actions other than Official Development Assistance in countries falling under Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006
(Pobuda – Člen 39 Poslovnika)
(Initiative – Rule 39 of the Rules of Procedure)
(*) Pridruženi odbori – člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated Committee – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
1. pozdravlja reformo instrumentov zunanje politike Evropske unije iz leta 2006, ki je prvič postavila jasen okvir za uradno razvojno pomoč Evropske unije v eni uredbi, instrumentu za razvojno sodelovanje;
Welcomes the 2006 reform of the EU's foreign policy instruments which set up for the first time a clear framework for the EU's Official Development Assistance (ODA) under one regulation, the Instrument for Development Cooperation (DCI);
3. poziva Komisijo, naj mu v šestih mesecih po sprejetju te resolucije na podlagi členov 179 in 181a pogodbe predloži zakonodajni predlog za spremembo Uredbe Sveta št. 1934/2006 z dne 21. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje sodelovanja z industrijsko razvitimi in drugimi državami ter ozemlji z visokim dohodkom; Komisiji predlaga, naj bo to instrument za sodelovanje s tretjimi državami na področjih, ki ne sodijo pod uradno razvojno pomoč;
Calls on the Commission to submit to it, within six months of the date of adoption of this resolution, on the basis of Articles 179 and 181a of the Treaty, a legislative proposal amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1934/2006 of 21 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories; requests the Commission to make this an "Instrument for Non-ODA Cooperation with Third Countries";
5. predlaga, naj zakonodajni predlog sledi priporočilom, ki jih je v prilogi podal glavni odbor, le tretji odstavek točke 1 naj se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Requests that the legislative proposal follow the recommendations set out in the annex established by the lead committee, except that paragraph 3 of point 1 should be replaced by the following: