natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
L. ker Parlament meni, da bi lahko skladno s členom 230 Pogodbe ES po potrebi pravno utemeljeno uvedel ustrezne ukrepe za odpravo hujše kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki jo je odkril med preiskavo peticije, ali v primerih, kjer je Parlament kljub poskusom usklajevanja in po posvetu s svojo pravno službo še vedno drugačnega mnenja kot Komisija, kar se tiče ukrepov, ki jih za varstvo državljanskih pravic v zadevnih primerih določa zakonodaja Skupnosti,
L. whereas Parliament has considered that it would be legitimate for it to make use of its powers under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, if this proved necessary in order to put an end to a serious infringement of Community law which has been revealed in the course of examination of a petition and where a significant difference of interpretation persists, despite efforts to resolve it, between Parliament and the Commission, as regards the action required under Community law for the protection of citizens' rights in the case concerned,
M. ker postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev ni rešitev za vlagatelje peticij, četudi mora država članica po nalogu Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti spremeniti svojo zakonodajo, da jo uskladi z zakonodajnimi akti Skupnosti,
M. whereas the infringement procedure does not provide a remedy for petitioners even when a Member State is obliged by the Court of Justice to modify its legislation so as to bring it into conformity with EU legislative acts,
N. ker je nezmožnost za zagotovitev zunajsodne rešitve neposredno za državljane EU, ki so (bili) žrtve neustrezne uporabe prava EU, temeljna krivica, ki jo morajo nadalje obravnavati institucije EU, zlasti Parlament,
N. whereas the inability to provide a non-judicial remedy directly to EU citizens who have been or have become victims of the lack of proper application of EU law constitutes a basic injustice which requires further consideration by the EU institutions, and in particular by Parliament,
O. ker ima Parlament po členu 230 Pogodbe o ES pravico, da se obrne na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti pod enakimi pogoji kot Svet in Komisija, in ker Parlament v skladu s členom 201 te pogodbe nadzira dejavnosti Komisije in ima zato na voljo tako pravna kot politična sredstva za učinkovitejši odgovor na legitimna vprašanja državljanov,
O. whereas, under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, Parliament has the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice under the same conditions as the Council and the Commission and whereas, pursuant to Article 201 of the EC Treaty, Parliament is empowered to exercise control over the activities of the Commission and thus has at its disposal both the legal and the political instruments to respond more effectively to citizens' legitimate concerns,
P. ker bi moral Parlament pregledati svoje postopke, da bi poenostavil postopke pred Sodiščem, zlasti po členu 121 svojega poslovnika, kadar so ogrožene pravice vlagateljev peticij,
P. whereas Parliament should review its own procedures in order to facilitate actions, notably under Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, before the Court of Justice when the rights of petitioners are at stake,
Q. ker je treba opozoriti, da temelji Unija po členu 6 Pogodbe ES na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države, ki so temeljne sestavine köbenhavnskih meril za pristop k EU, in ker člen 7 Pogodbe EU določa posebne postopke, ki se lahko sprožijo ob hudih in stalnih kršitvah navedenih načel ali očitni nevarnosti zanje,
Q. whereas it should be recalled that, pursuant to Article 6 of the EU Treaty, the Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which also constitute a basic element of the Copenhagen criteria for accession to the EU, and whereas Article 7 of the EU Treaty lays down specific procedures which can be initiated for serious and persistent breaches of the principles mentioned, or a clear risk thereof,
R. ker upošteva predloge resolucij na podlagi člena 192(1) poslovnika Parlamenta, vloženih na plenarnih zasedanjih leta 2008 in sprejetih s prepričljivo večino poslancev, na podlagi prejetih peticij o vplivu plinovoda Severni tok pod Baltskim morjem in o zavajajočih podjetjih za imeniške storitve,
R. mindful of the motions for resolutions submitted to plenary in 2008 and adopted by an overwhelming majority of Members, pursuant to Rule 192(1) of Parliament's Rules of Procedure on the basis of petitions received concerning the impact of the Nord Stream gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea and concerning misleading directory companies,
S. ker je večja zaskrbljenost glede zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo privedla do projektov za plinovode in za utekočinjeni zemeljski plin, ki – zlasti če so pripravljeni na hitro ter brez ustrezne ocene tveganja in alternativnih možnosti – pri vlagateljih peticij povzročajo zaskrbljenost zaradi premajhnega upoštevanja hude nevarnosti za okolje in človekovo zdravje, predvsem pri projektih v Baltskem morju, Walesu in na Irskem,
S. whereas increased concerns over energy supply security have resulted in projects for pipelines for natural gas and liquefied natural gas which, especially when they are rushed through without proper evaluation of the risks and alternatives, have raised petitioners' concerns over the lack of consideration given to potentially serious risks to the environment and human health and safety in respect of, notably, projects in the Baltic Sea, Wales and Ireland,
T. ker je iz obravnave peticij jasno, da seznam projektov, ki so omenjeni v prilogah k direktivi Sveta 85/337/EGS z dne 27. junija 1985 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje
T. whereas it is evident from the examination of petitions that the lists of projects mentioned in the Annexes to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment
40. , kakor je bila spremenjena, ne zajema številnih pomembnejših objektov in dejavnosti, ki so nastali po zadnjih spremembah teh prilog, na primer uplinjevalnikov ali obratov za pridelavo biodizla,
40. , as amended, do not cover a number of important installations and activities which have emerged since the latest amendments to those Annexes, such as re-gasification plants and bio-diesel plants,
U. ker številne vložene peticije, povezane z omrežjem Natura 2000, nenehno kažejo, da je preprečevanje izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti velik izziv za Unijo in da sta direktivi o habitatih
U. whereas the many petitions presented in relation to the Natura 2000 network have continued to show that ending loss of biodiversity constitutes a major challenge for the Union and that the Habitats Directive
7). in pticah
7). and the Birds Directive
1). temeljni in nepogrešljivi orodji EU za izpolnitev njene zaveze o preprečevanju izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010,
1). constitute basic and indispensable tools for fulfilling the EU's commitment to end biodiversity loss by 2010,
V. ker se je pri obravnavi peticij izkazalo tudi, da pomanjkanje zadostnih virov pogosto poslabšajo še drugi dejavniki, na primer vse večje povpraševanje po vodi zaradi pretirane urbanizacije in projektov za šport in prosti čas, nezadostno vzdrževana infrastruktura in preprečevanje puščanja, velika poraba vode v intenzivnem kmetijstvu in politika oblikovanja cen, ki ne spodbuja trajnostne rabe vode,
V. whereas the examination of petitions has also shown that the lack of sufficient sources of fresh water is frequently aggravated by other factors such as growing demand for water due to excessive urbanisation and leisure projects, inadequate maintenance of infrastructure and prevention of leakage, intensive use of water by industrial agriculture and a pricing policy which does not encourage the sustainable use of water,
W ker želi spomniti na priporočila Odbora za peticije po njegovih obiskih v kraju Fos-sur-Mer, na Cipru in v Romuniji,
W mindful of the recommendations made by the Committee on Petitions following visits to Fos-sur-Mer, Cyprus and Romania,
X. ker upošteva zaskrbljenost, ki jo je Odbor za peticije izrazil glede nekaterih infrastrukturnih projektov v gorovju Rila v Bolgariji, ki jih je opazil med misijo za ugotavljanje dejstev leta 2008,
X.. bearing in mind the concern expressed by the Committee on Petitions in relation to certain infrastructure projects in the Rila Mountains in Bulgaria, observed during a fact-finding visit in 2008,
Y. ker britanska vlada januarja 2009 kljub temu, da se je britanska varuhinja človekovih pravic za parlamentarna in zdravstvena vprašanja Ann Abraham decembra 2008 obrnila na Odbor za peticije in mu predstavila svoje ugotovitve, za katere je potrebovala štiri leta, odzvala, da bi bilo mogoče nadomestilo ex gratia (torej brez prevzemanja pravne odgovornost in ustvarjanja pravnih precedensov) za tiste, ki so utrpeli nesorazmerno škodo, to pa ni ustrezen način za odškodovanje številni žrtev propadle zavarovalnice,
Y. whereas although Ann Abraham, the UK Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, addressed the Committee on Petitions in December 2008 and presented it with her findings, which took her four years to complete, the subsequent response by the UK Government in January 2009, involving possible ex gratia payments to those disproportionately affected, cannot be regarded as a proper remedy for the many victims of the debacle,
Z. ker priznava pozitivno in konstruktivno sodelovanje z evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic leta 2008, podporo Odbora za peticije za priporočila iz njegovega letnega poročila 2007 ter njegovi posebni poročili o pritožbah št. 1487/2005/ in 3453/2005/ o uporabi jezikov v Svetu in o tem, kako Komisija uporablja postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, ter pozdravlja spremembe v varuhovem statutu, ki jih je potrdil Parlament,
Z. recognising the positive and constructive cooperation with the European Ombudsman in 2008, the support provided by the Committee on Petitions for the recommendations contained in his Annual Report for 2007 and his Special Reports on complaints 1487/2005/ and 3453/2005/ respectively concerning the use of languages by the Council and the Commission's application of the infringement procedure, and welcoming the modifications to his Statute approved by Parliament,
AA. ker je Odbor za peticije leta 2008 prejel 1886 peticij, od katerih jih je bilo 1065 dopustnih, 821 pa nedopustnih; ker je število peticij, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev iz člena 191(1) poslovnika Parlamenta, od začetka 2007, znatno naraslo,
AA. whereas in 2008 the Committee on Petitions received 1 886 petitions, of which 1 065 were declared admissible and 821 were declared inadmissible; whereas the number of petitions that do not meet the conditions of Rule 191(1) of the Rules of Procedure has significantly risen since the beginning of 2007,
4. poziva, naj se v doglednem času izvedejo priporočila, ki so bila sprejeta v letnem poročilu 2007 in še niso izpolnjena;
Calls for those recommendations adopted in the 2007 Annual Report which have not yet been implemented to be implemented within a reasonable timeframe;
7. meni, da bi takšna revizija dopolnila morebitno izvajanje lizbonske pogodbe, saj bi omogočila dodatna varovala, ki bi temeljila na priznanih pravicah in dolžnostih državljanov ter institucij EU;
Believes that such a review would complement any eventual implementation of the Lisbon Treaty by providing additional safeguards based on the declared rights and obligations of EU citizens and EU institutions;
9. ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi večje priznavanje in upoštevanje procesa obravnavanja peticij, zlasti glede peticij o postopkih za ugotavljanje kršitev in glede zahteve po neposrednem in uradnem obveščanju Odbora za peticije, kadar se v zvezi z vprašanji iz posameznih peticij sprejemajo odločitve o začetku postopkov iz členov 226 in/ali 228;
Calls on the Commission, once again, to ensure that greater recognition is given to, and greater emphasis placed on, the petitions process, notably as regards application of the infringement procedures and the requirement to inform the Committee on Petitions directly and officially when decisions are taken to initiate proceedings under Articles 226 and/or 228 which are related to the issues raised in individual petitions;
Resolucija P6-0040/2005. ;
Resolution P6-0040/2005. ;
13. poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju s Parlamentom v državah članicah spodbuja dolgoročno razmišljanje – zlasti na področju prostorskega načrtovanja, da bi preprečili morebitne kršitve pravnih predpisov Skupnosti, ki so že sprejeti, niso pa še začeli veljati;
Calls for the Commission, in cooperation with Parliament, to promote to Member States the importance of forward thinking – especially in the area of planning approval – in helping to prevent potential breaches of provisions of Community law that have been adopted but are not yet in force;
17. ugotavlja, da peticija o enem sedežu Parlamenta s podpisi 1.500.000 oseb, ki želijo, da bi bil Evropski parlament na enem mestu, še ni bila do konca obravnavana; priporoča, naj Odbor za peticije to zadevo prednostno obravnava v naslednjem parlamentarnem mandatu;
Notes that the "one-seat petition" signed by 1 500 000 people, which seeks to have the European Parliament meet in one location, has not yet been fully addressed; recommends that the Committee on Petitions deal with this matter as a priority during the next parliamentary term;
19. opozarja na zahtevo Parlamenta, naj Komisija okrepi nadzor nad izvajanjem direktive 2006/114/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju
Recalls Parliament's request to the Commission to step up its monitoring of the implementation of Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising
21. za zavajajoča podjetja za imeniške storitve in poroča Parlamentu o izvedljivosti in morebitnih posledicah razširitve področja uporabe za direktivo 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu
21. with regard to misleading business-directory companies and to report to Parliament on the feasibility and possible consequences of extending the scope of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market
22. , predvsem s tem, da bi nadomestili izraz "potrošnik" s "ciljna stranka prakse";
22. , specifically by replacing the word 'consumer' by the words 'target of the practice';
21. podpira poziv varuha človekovih pravic Komisiji v zvezi z izvajanjem direktive o delovnem času
21 Endorses the Ombudsman's call to the Commission, with reference to the implementation of the Working Time Directive
Direktiva Sveta 93/104/EGS z dne 23. novembra 1993 o določenih vidikih organizacije delovnega časa (UL L 307, 13.12.1993, str.
Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ L 307, 13.12.1993, p.
18). , naj obravnava pritožbe državljanov v skladu z načelom dobrega upravljanja na področju njenih diskrecijskih pooblastil glede začenjanja postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev;
18). , to handle complaints by citizens in conformity with principles of good administration in the field of the Commission's discretionary powers regarding the opening of infringement procedures;
OJ C 72 E, 21.3.2002, str.
OJ C 72 E, 21.3.2002, p.
23. poziva vse strani, naj izvajajo resolucijo št. 550 (1984) varnostnega sveta OZN o ciprskem vprašanju, kar bi imelo za posledico popolno vrnitev lastnine zakonitim lastnikom v Varosii; predlaga, da bi lahko pristojni odbor predstavil problematiko vlagateljev peticije o območju Famagusta na plenarnem zasedanju, če do konca leta 2009 ne bi bilo vidnih rezultatov;
Urges the implementation by all parties of UN Security Council Resolution 550 (1984) on the Cyprus issue, which would lead to the full restoration of property to its legitimate owners in Varosha; suggests that, in the event that there are no visible results by the end of 2009, the committee responsible might consider bringing the issue of the Famagusta petitioners to plenary;
OJ C 227 E, 4.9.2008, str.
OJ C 227 E, 4.9.2008, p.
162. ; v zvezi s težavami glede vračanja nepremičnin, zaseženih v času komunističnega režima, poudarja, da lastništvo nepremičnin po členu 295 Pogodbe o ES spada v nacionalno pristojnost;
162. ; with reference to the problems concerning restitution of property confiscated under the Communist regime, points out that, under Article 295 of the EC Treaty, property ownership is a matter of national competence;
UL L 163, 29.6.1999, str.
OJ L 163, 29.6.1999, p.
41. ne prepoveduje gradnje sežigalnice na območju, na katerem je ozračje že onesnaženo, poudarja pa, da je treba po tej direktivi in direktivi Sveta 96/62/ES z dne 2. septembra 1996 o ocenjevanju in upravljanju kakovosti zunanjega zraka
41. does not prohibit the construction of an incinerator in an area already affected by atmospheric pollution, but points out that, under Directive 1999/30/EC and Council Directive 96/62/EC of 27 September 1996 on ambient air quality assessment and management
27. naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in poročilo Odbora za peticije posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, njihovim odborom za peticije ter nacionalnim varuhom človekovih pravic oziroma podobnim pristojnim organom.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution, and the report of the Committee on Petitions, to the Council, the Commission, the European Ombudsman, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, their committees on petitions and their national ombudsmen or similar competent bodies.
Odbor za peticije si je v tem zakonodajnem obdobju prizadeval zagotoviti, da bi v skladu s členom 194 Pogodbe vprašanja in izraze zaskrbljenosti, ki so jih evropski državljani in prebivalci v obliki peticij vložili pri Evropskem parlamentu, ustrezno upoštevali in da nanje ustrezno odgovorili.
Throughout this legislature the Petitions Committee has worked to ensure that issues and concerns which were brought directly to the attention of the European Parliament through the petitions process by European citizens and residents, under Article 194 of the Treaty, have been properly considered and answered.
Čeprav odbor prejema vedno več zahtev, ki si jih prizadeva rešiti, mu je bilo za njegovo delovanje na številnih področjih izkazano spoštovanje in priznanje, kar se v preteklih letih ni dogajalo.
Although the Committee continues to struggle to keep up with the growing demands made upon it, it has in many areas obtained a respect and recognition for its activity which it did not have several years earlier.
Napredek je bil na primer dosežen pri zagotavljanju večje preglednosti glede vprašanj, ki zbujajo zaskrbljenost državljanov, z večjo udeležbo vlagateljev peticij na sejah odbora, kjer lahko izrazijo in utemeljijo svojo zaskrbljenost, prav tako pa je bil dosežen bistven napredek glede dostopa posameznih poslancev do peticij in z njimi povezanih dokumentov prek nove računalniške podatkovne zbirke.
For example, advances have been made to ensure not only the greater transparency of citizens' concerns by a growing participation of petitioners in meetings of the Committee where they have been able to defend and promote their concerns, but also essential improvements have been made to individual members' ability to access petitions and all related documents, through the development of a new computer data base.
Peticije se delijo v več kategorij in tistim, ki opazujejo delovanje odbora samo od daleč (tudi znotraj Parlamenta), ni vedno jasno, kakšen je dejanski namen njegovega delovanja.
Petitions fall into different categories and for people who only observe the Committee's activity from a distance (even within the Parliament) it is not always clear what the real purpose of the Committee's task is.
Eden od razlogov za to je, da odbor ne izvaja samo ene naloge, marveč ima široko paleto možnosti, ki mu omogočajo, da za vsako vloženo peticijo izbere najprimernejše ukrepanje.
This is partly because it does not have a single task, but a very varied set of options which enable it to identify the most useful course of action for each petition submitted.
Poleg tega se postopki, ki jih uporablja, zelo razlikujejo od postopkov zakonodajnih odborov, ki imajo na institucionalni ravni zaradi pristojnosti Parlamenta največjo veljavo in jim je namenjena največja pozornost.
It is also because its procedures used are very different from those of legislative committees which, because of Parliaments responsibilities, attract most prestige and most attention institutionally.
Celo javnosti v sedemindvajsetih državah članicah ni vedno jasno, kaj peticija je ali kaj lahko v zvezi z njo stori Parlament.
Even for the public in the twenty seven Member States it is not always apparent as to what a petition is or what the Parliament can do about it.
Zato bi bilo koristno, da bi v tem letnem poročilu poskusili opredeliti različne vrste peticij, ki jih prejema odbor.
It may therefore be helpful, in this annual report, to begin by trying to identify the different types of petitions which the Committee receives.
· Peticije, povezane s kampanjami : podpiše jih večje število državljanov za podporo bolj objektivnemu političnemu cilju, pri čemer število podpisov kaže na to, kako velik je javni interes v zvezi z neko temo.
· Campaign type petitions : these are signed by a very large number of citizens in support of a more political objective where the number of signatures is an indication of the amount of public interest in a given subject.
Takšne peticije zadevajo na primer proteste proti bikoborbam v Španiji, pobijanje mladičev kitov, človeško trpljenje zaradi konflikta med izraelskim in palestinskim prebivalstvom, razmere v iraškem Kurdistanu, demokratizacijo v Belorusiji, grozljive humanitarne razmere v Zimbabveju, enotni sedež Parlamenta v Bruslju itd.
Examples include those who protest about bullfighting in Spain, the slaughter of baby seals, the humanitarian suffering caused by the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people, the situation in Iraqi Kurdistan, democratisation in Belarus, the atrocious humanitarian situation in Zimbabwe, a 'single seat' for the Parliament in Brussels and so on.
· Peticije, povezane z vplivanjem : prav tako jih lahko podpiše večje število ljudi, njihov namen pa je vplivati na posamezne zakonodajne predloge, ki jih lahko obravnava ustrezen parlamentarni odbor.
· Influence type petitions : these may be signed by a large number of persons also, but they are intended to impact upon specific legislative proposals which may be under consideration within a given Parliamentary committee.
Takšne peticije zadevajo na primer sisteme patentiranja programske opreme, pravico do azila in pravice državljanov tretjih držav, energetsko-podnebni sveženj, uredbo REACH itd.
Examples include the software patents scheme, asylum and rights for third-country nationals, the energy-climate package, REACH and so on.
· Izvajanje prava EU in pravic iz Pogodbe : tovrstne peticije so najbolj zahtevne, ker iščejo izvensodne rešitve ali razlage za to, kako države članice izvajajo zakonodajne akte ali spoštujejo svoje obveznosti iz Pogodbe, povezane med drugim s temeljnimi pravicami.
· Application of EU law and Treaty rights : these are the most demanding because they seek non-judicial solutions or explanations concerning the way Member States apply legislative acts, or respect their treaty obligations related amongst other issues, to fundamental rights.
So najbolj sporne in za Parlament najpomembnejše.
They are the most controversial and for the Parliament they have the highest profile.
So preskusni kamen za to, kako se državljani EU odzivajo na evropsko zakonodajo, in v njih pogosto opozarjajo Parlament na pomanjkljivosti v državah članicah.
They provide a litmus test regarding how EU citizens respond to European legislation and they often alert the Parliament to serious short-comings within Member States.