natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zadnji stavek člena 5(4) („ če to ustrezno utemeljujejo posebne okoliščine, kot je objektivna potreba po določitvi daljšega plačilnega roka “) je nekoliko dvoumen in povzroča zmedo, zlasti pri izvajanju obročnih odplačil.
The last sentence of Article 5, paragraph 4 (" duly justified in the light of particular circumstances such as an objective need to schedule payment over a longer period ") is somewhat ambiguous and creates confusion, especially as regards to its application to staggered payments.
Poročevalka predlaga natančnejšo ubeseditev možnosti odstopanja od 30-dnevnega roka, ki še vedno omogoča potrebno prilagodljivost, da se lahko upoštevajo primeri, v katerih je daljše plačilno obdobje upravičeno.
Your Rapporteur suggests a more precise wording of the possibility for derogating from the 30 days which still allows for the necessary flexibility to take into account justified cases for a longer payment period.
Poleg tega podpira zamisel, da se določi 60 dni kot najdaljši možni plačilni rok za državne organe.
She further supports the establishing of 60 days as a maximum length of the payment period for public authorities.
Enake kazni za podjetja in državne organe
Equal sanctions for undertakings and public authorities
Poročevalka zagovarja bolj uravnotežen pristop pri obravnavi podjetij in državnih organov.
Your Rapporteur supports a more balanced approach to the treatment of undertakings and public authorities.
Čeprav podpira različno obravnavo podjetij in državnih organov, ko gre za plačilne roke, meni, naj se za oboje uporabljajo enaka pravila o kaznih.
Whilst she supports a differential treatment of undertakings and public authorities as regards to the payment periods, she considers that equal rules on sanctions shall apply to undertakings and public authorities.
Poleg tega se ji 5 % dolgovanega zneska, ko obresti za zamudo pri plačilu zapadejo v plačilo, ne zdi sorazmerna kazen.
Your Rapporteur furthermore considers that 5% of the amount due from when the interest for late payment becomes payable is not a proportionate sanction.
Poročevalka predlaga postopen in progresiven sistem, v katerem bi dolžnik plačal 2 % zneska, ko obresti za zamudo pri plačilu zapadejo v plačilo, in 4 % zneska od 45 dne, ko obresti za zamudo pri plačilu zapadejo v plačilo, po 60 dneh od tega roka pa bi se delež povišal na 5 %.
Your Rapporteur proposes a gradual and progressive system whereby the debtor would pay 2% of the sum from the date when interest for late payment becomes payable and 4% of the sum from the 45th day after the interest for late payment becomes payable with an increase to 5% after 60 days from the date when interest becomes payable.
Predlaga tudi, da kazen v nobenem primeru ne bi bila višja od 50 000 EUR.
The Rapporteur also proposes that the penalty should never be more than 50,000 EUR.
Vključitev komunalnih podjetij (Direktiva 2004/17/ES) v režim državnih organov
Inclusion of utility undertakings (Directive 2004/17/EC) in the regime of public authorities
Poročevalka podpira vključitev trgovinskih poslov komunalnih podjetij v smislu Direktive 2004/17/ES v režim predloga za državne organe.
Your Rapporteur supports including the commercial transactions of utility undertakings within the meaning of the Directive 2004/17/EC in the proposal's regime for public authorities.
Meni, da se lahko komunalna podjetja, ki, podobno kot državni organi, uživajo posebne in ekskluzivne pravice, zanesejo na stalne (ali vsaj predvidljive) prihodke.
She considers that, similar to public authorities, utility undertakings enjoying special or exclusive rights can rely on constant (or, at least predictable) revenues.
Zato bi bilo treba ta podjetja obravnavati enako kot državne organe.
Therefore, utility undertakings should be treated in the same way as public authorities.
Pozitivne spodbude in spremljevalni ukrepi
Positive incentives and accompanying measures
Poročevalka predlaga spremembe, katerih namen je razširiti pristop Komisije in prestaviti usmeritev s povsem pravnega pristopa k pristopu na podlagi spodbud.
Your Rapporteur proposes amendments which aim at broadening the Commission’s approach and at shifting its focus from a purely legalistic approach to an incentive-based approach.
Prvič, države članice želi spodbuditi k uporabi kodeksov takojšnjega plačila, seznamov rednih plačnikov in drugih podobnih instrumentov za spoprijem z pomembnim vprašanjem zamud pri plačilih, ki pripomorejo k razvijanju kulture takojšnjega plačevanja, kar podpira cilje te direktive.
Firstly, she wishes to encourage Member States to use prompt payment codes, positive naming and other similar instruments that tackle the crucial issue of late payment and contribute to developing a culture of prompt payment which supports the aims of this Directive.
Drugič, predlaga, da države članice uporabijo strokovne publikacije, promocijske kampanje ali katera koli druga funkcionalna sredstva, da bi povečale osveščenost o pravnih sredstvih zoper zamude pri plačilih med podjetji.
Secondly, she proposes that Member States shall use professional publications, promotion campaigns or any other functional means to increase awareness of the remedies against late payment among businesses.
Tretjič, želi spodbuditi uporabo mediacije in drugih načinov alternativnega reševanja sporov.
Thirdly, your Rapporteur wishes to encourage the use of the usage of mediation and other means of alternative dispute resolution.
Osnutek mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve
Draft Opinion of the Legal Affairs Committee
Poročevalka upošteva predlog spremembe pripravljavca mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve, da se v področje uporabe člena 6 vključijo določbe v zvezi s plačilnimi roki, kar po sporazumu med odboroma IMCO in JURI sodi v pristojnost odbora JURI.
The Rapporteur takes note of the amendment of the Rapporteur of the Committee on Legal Affairs to include terms relating to payment periods in the scope of Article 6 which falls under the competence of the JURI Committee, following an agreement between the IMCO and the JURI Committee.
Ta predlog spremembe želi podpreti. o
She wishes to express her support for this amendment. o
Objavljeno bo posebej.
Will be published separately.
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE DELOVNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB
ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES
Bruselj, 7. maj 2009
Brussels, 7 May 2009
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, zlasti z njegovo 9. točko, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 22. aprila 2009, da bi med drugim proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predstavila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 22 April 2009 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna različica obravnavanega besedila. je posvetovalna delovna skupina po preučitvi predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenovitvi Direktive 2000/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. junija 2000 o boju proti zamudam pri plačilih v trgovinskih poslih soglasno ugotovila, da bi morali biti naslednji deli besedila prenovljenega predloga osenčeni s sivo barvo, ki se običajno uporablja za označitev bistvenih sprememb:
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, that the following parts of the text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes:
– v uvodni izjavi 15 predlagana zamenjava besede „ zaradi “ z besedami „ v zvezi z “;
- in recital 15, the proposed replacing of the words " caused by " with the word " regarding ";
– v členu 9(1) beseda „ običajno “ (že prečrtana z dvojno črto);
- in Article 9(1), the word " normally " (having been marked with the "double-strikethrough"
pravnik pravnik generalni direktor
Jurisconsult Jurisconsult Director General
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o boju proti zamudam pri plačilih v trgovinskih poslih (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating late payment in commercial transactions (recast)
Pripravljavec mnenja (*): Raffaele Baldassarre
Rapporteur (*): Raffaele Baldassarre
(*) Pridruženi odbor – člen 50 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committee – Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
Novi predlog Komisije je bil skupaj z oceno učinka kot prenovitev objavljen 8. aprila 2009
The Commission's new proposal, in the form of a recast, was published on 8 April 2009, together with an impact assessment
Pripombe odbora, ki je pripravil oceno učinka, so dostopne na: http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/ia_carried_out/cia_2009_en.htm#entr. .
The Impact Assessment Board's comments are available at http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/ia_carried_out/cia_2009_en.htm#entr. .
Parlament ga je uradno prejel 14. septembra 2009 in ga obravnava v rednem zakonodajnem postopku.
It was officially received by Parliament on 14 September 2009 and is being dealt with under the ordinary legislative procedure.
4 in uvodna izjava 17 predloga.
Explanatory memorandum, p.4 and recital 17 of the proposal.
Za nekatere statistične podatke po državah članicah glej oceno učinka strani 60–61 in 68–71. .
For some statistics per Member State, see impact assessment at pp. 60-61 and 68-71. .
Ker so javna naročila v državah članicah leta 2006 znašala nekaj čez 1°943 milijard evrov
With public procurement by Member States amounting in 2006 to just over 1 943 billion euro
Ocena učinka, stran 68. , Komisija predlaga, da bi vprašanje rešili na podlagi temeljnega razlikovanja med podjetji dolžniki, proti katerim direktiva zagotavlja uporabo fakultativnih pravnih sredstev, in pravnimi organi dolžniki, proti katerim bi se oblikovala povečana in avtomatična pravna sredstva, na katera bi se lahko zanašala podjetja upniki.
Impact assessment at p.68. , the Commission proposes to tackle this trend by making a central distinction between debtor businesses, against whom the directive provides optional remedies, and debtor public authorities, against whom increased and automatic remedies are generated which can be relied on by creditor businesses.
Po dogovoru med Odborom za pravne zadeve in Odborom za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov bodo v skladu s členom 50 poslovnika členi 6, 8 in 9 ter uvodne izjave 4, 12, 18, 19, 20 in 22 predloga v izključni pristojnosti Odbora za pravne zadeve.
Following an agreement between the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the former will be exclusively responsible under Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure for Articles 6, 8 and 9 and Recitals 4, 12, 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the proposal.
Pripravljavec mnenja podpira glavnino predloga in namerava mnenje Odbora za pravne zadeve tvorno uporabiti pri delu pristojnega odbora.
Your rapporteur supports the main thrust of the proposal and intends the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs to constructively feed into the work of the lead committee.
Meni, da bi lahko bil z nekaj drobnimi uskladitvami in novostmi predlog, ki je predstavljen v tem mnenju, ključen za učinkovito delovanje notranjega trga in bi znatno prispeval k nujnemu premiku h kulturi takojšnjega plačevanja v državah članicah.
He considers that the proposal, with some fine-tuning and innovations as proposed in this draft opinion, to be essential for the effective functioning of the internal market and to have the potential to contribute significantly to the necessary shift to a culture of prompt payment which he would like to see in the Member States.
Stališče pripravljavca mnenja o členih 6, 8 in 9
Position of the rapporteur on Articles 6, 8 and 9.
Predloga spremembe 3 in 10 imata več vidikov, ki so obrazloženi posamično.
Amendments 3 and 10 comprise several aspects which are explained in turn.
Prvi je, da pojasni, da nekatere poslovne prakse, ki so povezane s pogodbo, niso pa dejansko njen del, ne bi smele biti izvršljive in bi morale biti podlaga za odškodninske zahtevke.
First of all, it seeks to clarify that certain commercial practices related to, but not strictly forming part of the contract, should also be unenforceable and give rise to a claim for damages.
Drugi je, da bi bilo medtem ko direktiva o boju proti zamudam pri plačilih govori o dogovorih, predlog pa o pogodbenih klavzulah, ustrezneje govoriti o pogojih, kar je skladneje tudi z ostalim delom pravnega reda in osnutkom skupnega referenčnega okvira (II. -9:401–410).
Secondly, the Late Payment Directive refers to "agreements" and the proposal to "contractual clauses", but the word "term" would seem more appropriate here and consistent with the rest of the acquis and the Draft Common Frame of Reference (II. -9:401-410, hereinafter the DCFR).
Tretjič, cilj tega predloga spremembe je zagotoviti, da bo direktiva o boju proti zamudam pri plačilih usklajena z osnutkom skupnega referenčnega okvira, ki skuša zagotoviti usklajenost med pomenom „nepošteno“ v izrazu „nepošteni pogoji“ pri zapoznelih plačilih (III. -3:711) in v izrazu „nepošteni pogoji“ na splošno v pogodbah med podjetji (II. -9:405).
Thirdly, this amendment aims to ensure that the revised Late Payment Directive is consistent with the DCFR which itself seeks consistency between the meaning of "unfair" in relation to unfair terms relating to late payment (III. -3:711) and unfair terms generally in contracts between businesses (II. -9:405).
Četrtič, predlog spremembe pojasni, da ta določba ureja tudi pogoje glede plačilnih rokov.
Fourthly, this amendment clarifies that terms relating to payment periods are also covered by this provision.
Prav tako skuša jasneje in bolj sistematično predstaviti različna merila, ki jih bodo v skladu z direktivo morali upoštevati nacionalni sodniki pri odločanju, ali sta neki pogoj ali poslovna praksa nepoštena.
Finally, this amendment seeks to present in a clearer and more systematic manner the different criteria which a national judge must take into account when deciding whether a term or commercial practice is unfair.
Pripravljavec mnenja je naklonjen predlogu, ki uvaja črni seznam pogodbenih pogojev v členu 6(1), druga alinea.
Your rapporteur takes a favourable approach to the proposal which creates a "black list" of contract terms in its Article 6(1) second indent.
Vendar pa meni, da je treba vanj vključiti tudi pogoj, ki predpisuje izključitev vsakršnega nadomestila za stroške izterjave, saj bi s tem gospodarske subjekte jasno opozorili, da je izključitev pravice do nadomestila za stroške izterjave, ki jo ta predlog želi okrepiti, nepošten pogoj, ki ga ni mogoče izvršiti do upnikov in ki bi lahko bil podlaga za uveljavljanje odškodnine (glej predloga sprememb 1 in 11 ) .
However, he considers that it is important to include in this list a term which purports to exclude any compensation for recovery costs, as this would send a clear message to economic operators that excluding the right to compensation for recovery costs, a right which the proposal seeks to strengthen, is an unfair term which cannot be enforced against creditors and which can give rise to a claim for damages (see Amendments 1 and 11 ).
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da predlog Komisije ni dovolj jasen glede pomembnih določb o sodnem varstvu za zastopniške organizacije in ne zagotavlja pravne varnosti.
Your rapporteur considers that the Commission's proposal concerning the important provision on redress by representative organisations lacks clarity and legal certainty.
Predlaga ponovno delno uporabo besedila direktive o boju proti zamudam pri plačilu, obenem pa podpira, da se vanj poleg organizacij, ki zastopajo mala in srednja podjetja, vključijo tudi druge, na primer organizacije, ki zastopajo določen industrijski sektor.
He proposes a partial return to the wording of the Late Payment Directive whilst supporting a widening beyond organisations representing SMEs, for example to organisations representing a particular industrial sector.
Predlaga tudi pojasnilo, da take zastopniške organizacije lahko ukrepajo tudi, kadar pogoj iz posamezne pogodbe domnevno krši direktivo, in ne samo glede standardnih pogojev (glej predlog spremembe 12 ).
He also proposes to clarify that actions by such representative organisations are not contingent on the existence of standard terms and conditions but can also cover, for example, an alleged breach of the directive by a term in an individual contract (see Amendment 12 ).
Ker je to predlog prenovitve, člen 8 (Pridržek lastninske pravice), ki ga Komisija ni spreminjala, ostaja enak – kljub pomenu, ki ga Parlament pripisuje temu vprašanju v pogajanjih pred sprejetjem direktive o boju proti zamudam pri plačilih.
Given that the proposal is a recast, Article 8 of the proposal ("Retention of title") which was left untouched by the Commission is similarly unamended, despite the importance of this issue for Parliament in the negotiations leading up to the adoption of the Late Payment Directive.
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da sprememba direktive o boju proti zamudam pri plačilih ne bi smela vplivati na pravila, ki urejajo postopke prisilne izvršbe, ki bi morali ostati v pristojnosti nacionalne zakonodaje.
Your rapporteur considers that the amendment of the Late Payment Directive should not affect the rules governing forced execution procedures, which should remain subject to national law.
To načelo je že jasno določeno z direktivo kot tudi s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije
This principle is already laid out clearly in the Late Payment Directive and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
Glej na primer sodbo v zadevi C-265/07 Caffaro Sodišča Evropske skupnosti [2008] I-45 z 11. septembra 2008. .
See, for example, the judgment in case C‑265/07 Caffaro ECR [2008] I-45 on 11 September 2008. .
Obenem meni, da si je treba prizadevati za skrajšanje obdobja, v katerem se lahko pridobi izvršilni naslov, ter za omogočanje sredstev za njegovo pridobitev (glej predloga sprememb 5 in 13 ).
At the same time, he is of the opinion that further efforts must be made to reduce the time-period within which an enforceable title can be obtained and to facilitate the means by which this can take place (see Amendments 5 and 13 ).
Pripravljavec mnenja je preučil možnosti povezave direktive s postopkom za evropski plačilni nalog
Your rapporteur examined a possible interlinking of the Late Payment Directive with the European Payment Order Procedure
Uredba (ES) št. 1896/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o uvedbi postopka za evropski plačilni nalog (UL L 399, 30.12.2006, str.
Regulation (EC) 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure, OJ L 399, 30.12.2006, p.
1). in bi želel, da bi to zamisel preučili še v odboru.
1. , and would be keen to pursue this line of thinking with colleagues in the committee.
Meni pa, da je na tej stopnji tako povezovanje oteženo zaradi omejenega materialnopravnega in geografskega dometa tega instrumenta (glej predlog spremembe 14 , ki je torej čisto tehničen).
However, at this stage, he considers that the reduced material and geographical scope of the latter instrument make such an interlinking difficult (see Amendment 14 , which is therefore purely technical).
Meni, da je treba povezati vsakršen napredek pri prenovitvi direktive s tekočim delom na evropskem portalu e-pravosodje, da se zagotovi najširše mogoče razširjanje in uporabo tega instrumenta (glej predlog spremembe 5 ).
He considers it important to link any progress made in the revision of the Late Payment Directive to ongoing work on the EU e-Justice portal in order to ensure the widest possible dissemination and use of the former instrument (see Amendment 5 ).
Pripravljavec mnenja priznava, da pristop k zamudnim plačilom na podlagi konfrontacij sam po sebi ne bo privedel do želenih sprememb v plačilni kulturi, saj upniki iz bojazni, da bodo škodovali nadaljnjemu poslovnemu razmerju, le redko uveljavljajo pravice iz direktiv, kot je zaračunavanje zamudnih obresti.
Your rapporteur recognises the fact that a confrontational approach to late payment is insufficient in itself in order to bring about the desired cultural shift in payment behaviour, given that creditors are often reluctant to avail themselves of their rights under the Late Payment Directive, for example to charge interest, for fear of damaging a continuing commercial relationship.
Zato se predlaga dopolnilni preventivni pristop, ki vsebuje oblikovanje in širitev kodeksov ravnanja ter možnost uporabe postopka mediacije (glej predloga spremembe 4 in 15 ).
A complementary preventive approach is therefore suggested, involving on the one hand the drawing up and dissemination of codes of good conduct, and on the other hand recourse to mediation (see Amendments 4 and 15 ).
Stališče pripravljavca mnenja o členu 5
Position of the rapporteur on Article 5.
Namen predloga spremembe 9 je obravnavati člen 5 s pravnega vidika.
Finally, Amendment 9 seeks to deal with Article 5 from a legal perspective.
Odstavek 5 člena 5 se črta, saj se ga dojema kot nesorazmeren kazenski ukrep, kar je v nasprotju z zakonodajo Unije.
Article 5(5) is deleted as it is perceived as a disproportionate and punitive measure which is contrary to Union law.
Ta predlog spremembe prav tako upošteva načelo, po katerem se plačilnih rokov pri poslovanju med podjetji ne sme uskladiti, saj bi bilo to v nasprotju z načeli sorazmernosti, subsidiarnosti in avtonomije strank, s tem pa bi se tudi bistveno zmanjšala možnost malih in srednjih podjetij za pridobitev komercialnega kredita.
Furthermore, the amendment upholds the principle that payment periods in business-to-business transactions should not be harmonised, as this would be contrary to the principles of proportionality, subsidiarity and party autonomy, and would radically reduce the possibility for SMEs to obtain trade credit.
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov kot pristojni odbor, da brez glasovanja sprejme predloge spremembe, ki sodijo v izključno pristojnost pridruženega odbora po postopku s pridruženimi odbori (člen 50):
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to accept without a vote those of its amendments which fall within the exclusive competence of the associated committee, under the procedure with associated committees (Rule 50):
Potrebna je odločna sprememba , vključno z obravnavanjem izključitve pravice do zaračunavanja obresti kot nepoštene pogodbene klavzule ter z zagotavljanjem nadomestil upnikom za njihove stroške, da bi preobrnili ta trend in zagotovili take posledice zamud pri plačilih, ki bi odvračale od zapoznelega plačevanja.
A decisive shift , including making the exclusion of the right to charge interest an unfair contractual clause and providing for a compensation of creditors for the costs incurred, is necessary to reverse this trend and to ensure that the consequences of late payments are such as to discourage late payment.