natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji, KOM(2006)0689 . .
Commission Communication entitled 'A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union' ( COM(2006)0689 ). .
Sredstvo za zagotavljanje tega mora biti postopek Lamfalussy.
The Lamfalussy process should be a means for ensuring this.
Poleg tega morajo vse direktive vključevati zakonsko zavezujoč rok za prenos, ki mora biti čim krajši in praviloma ne sme preseči dveh let.
In addition, all directives should include a legally binding time limit for their transposition, which should be as short as possible and, as a general rule, not exceed two years.
Odbor tudi poziva Komisijo, da sprejme proaktivnejši pristop k izvajanju zakonodaje.
The committee also calls on the Commission to adopt a more proactive attitude towards implementation.
Ohraniti mora dejavno vlogo skozi zakonodajni postopek in po njegovem zaključku ter sprejeti učinkovite instrumente za zagotavljanje, da bo imela zakonodaja zahtevane učinke.
It should retain an active role throughout and beyond the legislative process and put in place effective tools to ensure that the legislation is producing the required effects.
Komisija mora zahtevati, da jo države članice obveščajo o stanju izvajanja, da se breme enakomerno porazdeli med države članice in Komisijo, ter da se o takšnem pregledu poroča Evropskemu parlamentu.
The Commission should require that Member States report back on the status of implementation, so that the burden is shared equally between the Member States and the Commission, and that such an audit should be communicated to Parliament.
Postopek Lamfalussy mora pomagati zlasti s sodelovanjem zakonodajalcev in strokovnih delavcev pri postopku izvajanja.
The Lamfalussy process should usefully help through, in particular, the involvement of regulators and practitioners in the implementation process.
Odbor meni, da je treba pozdraviti izmenjavo najboljših praks med državami članicami, na primer v smislu paketnih sej in delavnic o prenosu, ki jih organizira Komisija.
The committee considers that the sharing of best practice between the Member States, for example in the context of package meetings and transposition workshops organised by the Commission, is to be welcomed.
Odbor v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj najde način za vključitev Parlamenta v takšne postopke, zlasti poročevalca, ki je zakon spremljal skozi zakonodajni postopek.
In this regard, the committee calls on the Commission to consider means of involving Parliament in such processes, in particular the rapporteur who has had the benefit of following the act throughout the legislative process.
Hkrati odbor poziva k odločni uporabi sankcij za kršitve, vključno s periodičnimi denarnimi kaznimi in pavšalnimi globami.
As a necessary complement, the committee calls for the firm application of sanctions for non-compliance, including periodic penalty payments and lump sum fines.
Odbor poudarja, da sta prenos in uporaba zakonodaje Skupnosti temeljni obveznosti držav članic.
The committee stresses that the primary obligation for transposing and applying Community law rests with the Member States.
Odbor v zvezi s tem spodbuja države članice, da kadar je mogoče, ustanovijo projektne skupine, ki bodo zakon spremljale skozi evropski zakonodajni postopek in več ravni postopka Lamfalussy ter tudi doma skozi postopek izvajanja, ter od Komisije zahteva, da preuči načine zagotavljanja pomoči državam članicam pri izvajanju teh projektnih skupin.
In that respect, the committee encourages Member States, where possible, to form project teams which follow an act not only through the European legislative process and its several Lamfalussy "levels" but also domestically throughout the national implementation process and requests the Commission to investigate ways in which to assist the Member States in the implementation of those project teams.
Odbor poudarja pomen izboljšanja razumevanja zakonodaje EC s strani državljanov in zato poziva, da se v vseh zakonodajnih predlogih predstavijo povzetki ali povzetki državljanov, kot se uporabljajo v nekaterih državah članicah
The committee stresses the importance of improving citizens’ understanding of EC legislation and therefore calls for the introduction in all legislative proposals of executive or citizens' summaries, as used in some Member States
Publikacija finskega pravosodnega ministrstva iz leta 2006:3, navodila za pripravo osnutka zakona, str.
Finnish Ministry of Justice Publication 2006:3, Bill Drafting Instructions, p.12, p.30. , which, although devoid of any legal effects, would form part of the act itself and constitute a non-technical explanation destined to citizens and other interested parties.
Komisijo poziva, naj prevzame vodilno vlogo pri tem vprašanju in naj se v skladu z odstavkom 19 resolucije Parlamenta s 16. maja 2006 o 21. in 22. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti (2003 in 2004) to vprašanje vključi v vse zakonodajne predloge povzetkov.
122. for the introduction in all legislative proposals of executive summaries.
Odbor močno priporoča, da Parlament, Komisija in Svet zlasti glede na prihodnji predlog o projektu plačilne sposobnosti (Solvency II) zmanjšajo uporabo možnosti, izjem ali odstopanj ali se, če je to mogoče, vzdržita njihove uporabe.
The committee strongly recommends, in view particularly of the forthcoming proposal on ‘Solvency II’, that Parliament, the Council and the Commission minimise or, if possible, refrain from making use of options, exceptions or derogations.
Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da ne bodo povzročale novih težav pri izvajanju in čezmejnih nedoslednosti z dodatnimi nacionalnimi zahtevami pri prenosu zakonodaje ES (čezmerno urejanje področja).
Member States must ensure that they are not causing new implementation problems and cross-border inconsistencies by imposing additional national requirements when transposing Community law (‘gold-plating’).
Vztraja tudi, da mora Komisija še naprej utrjevati, poenostavljati in kodificirati zakonodajo Skupnosti, da bi povečala njeno dostopnost, razumljivost in jasnost.
Moreover, the Commission must continue to consolidate, simplify and codify Community legislation so as to improve its accessibility, legibility and intelligibility.
Odbor močno priporoča, da direktive za olajšanje preverjanja nacionalne zakonodaje in sodne revizije ter za izboljšanje preglednosti sistematično vsebujejo zavezujočo obveznost za države članice, da pri prenosu direktiv pripravijo osnutek natančne korelacijske tabele.
The committee strongly recommends that, in order to facilitate the conformity checking of national legislation and judicial review and to increase transparency, directives should systematically contain a binding obligation on Member States to draft a detailed correlation table when transposing directives.
V ta namen mora Parlament sistematično vložiti predlog sprememb, kadar je za to pristojen.
Parliament should systematically table an amendment to that effect where it has the power to do so.
Odbor meni, da bi sistematična razpoložljivost korelacijskih tabel olajšala spremljanje Komisije, ki je v nekaterih primerih preveč zapleteno, ker nima instrumenta, ki bi jo vodil skozi izvajanje zakonodaje.
The committee is of the opinion that the systematic availability of correlation tables would ease the Commission’s monitoring task, which in certain cases is unduly complicated by the absence of an Ariadne’s thread to guide it through implementing legislation.
Odbor tudi meni, da bi sistematična dostopnost korelacijskih tabel spodbudila parlamente držav članic, da prevzamejo dejavnejšo vlogo pri spremljanju izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti, in jim pomagala pri nadzoru ter prevzemanju odgovornosti nacionalnih vlad.
The committee considers, furthermore, that the systematic availability of correlation tables would convince Member States' parliaments to play a more active role in the monitoring of the implementation of Community law and would help them in scrutinising their governments and holding them accountable.
Odbor meni, da se morajo države članice, če je mogoče, izogniti delnemu prenosu, ki je običajno pri prenosu direktiv, ki uporabljajo več zakonov različne hierarhije ali prek obstoječih nacionalnih zakonskih konceptov, ker zavira spremljanje izvajanja in slabša preglednost za državljane EU.
The committee believes that fragmentary transposition, that is the practice of transposing directives through multiple acts of varying hierarchy or through existing national legal concepts, should be avoided if possible by Member States, as that practice does not help the monitoring of implementation or increase transparency for EU citizens.
Ta ugotovitev je še bolj smiselna ob odsotnosti korelacijskih tabel.
Such a conclusion is all the more compelling in the absence of correlation tables.
Odbor priporoča, da se kot standardna pravna oblika za sprejemanje zakonodaje o zlasti občutljivih vprašanjih, kadar je mogoče, kadar se lahko uveljavljajo posebne pravice Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi s soodločanjem in/ali kadar je pogoj vseevropska doslednost, izbere uredba in ne direktiva, da se bolje doseže cilj zakonodajalca.
The committee recommends that, where possible, and in circumstances where Parliament’s prerogatives with regard to co-decision can be exercised, regulations - and not directives - are chosen as the standard legal form to legislate on particularly sensitive issues and/or where pan-EU consistency is a requisite, in order better to achieve the legislator's aims.
To velja zlasti za zakonodajo, kjer bi lahko napake pri prenosu, nedoslednost ali zamude znatno ogrozili varstvo potrošnikov v EU ali močno ovirali notranji trg.
This applies particularly to legislation where transposition errors, inconsistencies or delays might substantially threaten the protection of EU consumers or cause substantial disruptions in the internal market.
Odbor meni, da so tradicionalni mehanizmi uveljavljanja, ki temeljijo na postopkih Komisije za ugotavljanje kršitev, nujni, vendar nezadostni ob upoštevanju vse večjega števila ukrepov EU in držav članic.
The committee believes that traditional enforcement mechanisms based on infringement proceedings led by the Commission are necessary but by no means sufficient in light of the growing number of EC and Member States measures.
Odbor močno priporoča, da se ti mehanizmi dopolnijo z naprednejšimi mehanizmi sodelovanja med domačimi organi in s poudarkom na krepitvi usposobljenosti.
The committee strongly recommends that they be complemented by more sophisticated cooperation mechanisms with domestic authorities and a stronger emphasis on capacity building.
Odbor v zvezi s tem kot vzorčni primer podpira postopek Lamfalussy za bančništvo, vrednostne papirje in zavarovalniško zakonodajo.
In this context, the committee supports the Lamfalussy Process for banking, securities and insurance legislation as an example to follow.
Njegova večstopenjska ureditev upravljanja nadomešča tradicionalnejše oblike oblikovanja in uveljavljanja politike od zgoraj navzdol, s čimer spodbuja sodelovanje med nacionalnimi zakonodajalci in nadzorniki.
Its multilevel governance arrangements replace more traditional top-down forms of policymaking and enforcement, encouraging cooperation among national regulators and supervisors.
Odbor vseeno ugotavlja, da je treba posebne pravice Evropskega parlamenta pri uvedbi in izvajanju takšnih postopkov ustrezno zavarovati.
The committee notes, nevertheless, that Parliament's prerogatives need to be adequately safeguarded when such procedures are laid down and implemented.
Odbor zahteva več ukrepov Komisije in zlasti držav članic za reševanje jezikovnih težav in drugih težav, ki so povezane z izvajanjem zakonodaje ES.
The committee demands further measures, on the part of the Commission and especially the Member States, to solve linguistic and other problems encountered in the implementation of EC legislation.
Odbor odločno zahteva, da se Komisiji za izboljšanje kakovosti spremljanja prenosa nameni več sredstev in osebja (zlasti pravnikov jezikoslovcev).
The committee strongly requests that the Commission be given more resources and staff (particularly lawyer-linguists) in order for the quality of transposition monitoring to be improved.
Odbor poleg tega poziva Evropski parlament, da izpolni svojo obveznost in Komisijo podpre z dodelitvijo več proračunskih sredstev za to posebno nalogo.
Moreover, the committee calls on Parliament to follow through with this commitment and to support the Commission via increased budget appropriations for this specific task.
Odbor meni, da mora Komisija prevzeti proaktivnejšo vlogo pri spremljanju nacionalnih dogodkov, zlasti ko so povezani s ključnimi direktivami ES.
The committee believes that the Commission should take a more proactive stance when monitoring national events, in particular when they are related to crucial EC directives.
Komisija mora natančno spremljati nacionalne medije in tesno sodelovati s pomembnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, da pravočasno odkrije morebitne težave pri uporabi zakonodaje Skupnosti.
The Commission should closely follow the national media and be in close contact with the relevant stakeholders, in order to detect in time any potential problems in the application of Community law.
Odbor zato poziva Komisijo, naj intenzivneje vključuje svoje delegacije v državah članicah in preuči načine tesnejšega sodelovanja z državami članicami.
The committee therefore urges the Commission to make more intensive use of its delegations in the Member States and to investigate closer ways to cooperate with the Member States.
Poleg tega je treba nadalje prepoznati in okrepiti nujno ter simbolično vlogo evropskih državljanov pri učinkovitem spremljanju uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Moreover, the vital and symbolic role of EU citizens in the effective monitoring of the application of Community law should be further recognised and strengthened.
Odbor meni, da je ključno, da parlamenti držav članic in Evropski parlament tesneje sodelujejo pri spremljanju prenosa in uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti.
The committee believes that it is essential that Member States' parliaments and the European Parliament cooperate more closely in their monitoring of the transposition and application of Community law.
Tesnejše povezave bodo spodbudile in izboljšale učinkovit nadzor nad ukrepi Skupnosti na nacionalni ravni, ker morajo imeti nacionalni parlamenti pri takšnem spremljanju posebno in koristno vlogo.
Closer links will promote and increase effective scrutiny of Community measures at national level, as Member States' parliaments have a distinct and crucial role to play in such monitoring.
Hkrati bo takšno sodelovanje okrepilo demokratično legitimnost Evropske unije, ki se bo tako približala državljanom.
Likewise, such collaboration will strengthen the democratic legitimacy of the European Union, which will be brought closer to its citizens.
Odbor meni, da morajo stalni odbori Evropskega parlamenta prevzeti dejavnejšo vlogo pri spremljanju izvajanja zakonodaje, ki je v pristojnosti odbora.
The committee considers that Parliament’s standing committees should take a much more active role in monitoring the implementation of legislation in the committee’s field of competence.
Odbor predlaga, da mora poročevalec Parlamenta, odgovoren za določeno poročilo ali njegov imenovani naslednik, kadar je mogoče, prevzeti osrednjo in stalno vlogo pri tekoči reviziji izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti s strani držav članic in skladnosti z njo.
The committee suggests that, wherever possible, and practicable, Parliament’s rapporteur for a particular file or his/her appointed successor should play a central and continuing role in the ongoing review of implementation and compliance with Community law by the Member States.
Kot primer navaja redne seje o izvajanju, ki jih organizira Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane.
In that regard, the regular sessions on implementation organised by the Committee for the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety could serve as an example.
Brez poseganja v vlogo Komisije ali odbora za peticije Evropskega parlamenta bi bil lahko pristojni poročevalec kontaktna točka za pritožbe in povratne informacije državljanov.
Without prejudice to the role of the Commission or of Parliament’s Committee on Petitions, the relevant rapporteur could form a focal point for complaints and feedback from citizens.
Poleg tega mora poročevalec skupaj s poročevalci v senci ali poslanci Evropskega parlamenta, ki so tesno povezani s poročilom med zakonodajnim postopkom, imeti zadostno upravno podporo za učinkovito izvajanje naloge.
Furthermore, the rapporteur, together with the shadow rapporteurs or Members of the European Parliament closely involved with the file during the legislative process, should be given sufficient administrative support to carry out their mission effectively.
Če bi bil postopek ustrezen, bi lahko vodil k ustanovitvi delovne skupine za izvajanje zakonodaje v vsakem odboru.
If appropriate, this process could ultimately lead to the creation of an implementation task force within each committee.
Učinkovitost in izvajanje zakonodaje je treba redno in učinkovito spremljati.
There must be continuing and effective monitoring of the efficacy and implementation of legislation.
Odbor priporoča, da pristojni odbor začne delati ob upoštevanju predloga Komisiji in Svetu za spremembo Sklepa 95/167/ES, Euratom, ESPJ z namenom povečanja pristojnosti in avtoritete preiskovalnih odborov Evropskega parlamenta, zlasti s povečanjem njihovih preiskovalnih pooblastil, z uvedbo pristojnosti za zbiranje prič in dokazil v tesnem sodelovanju z organi držav članic, ki morajo biti zavezani k izvajanju takšne zahteve, in s tesnim sodelovanjem med preiskavo.
The committee recommends that its competent committee initiate work with a view to proposing to the Commission and to the Council a modification of Decision 95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC with a view to broadening the powers and enhancing the authority of Parliament's committees of inquiry, in particular with a view to enlarging their investigative powers, to giving them the power to summon witnesses and papers in close cooperation with Member States' authorities, which should be bound to enforce such a request and to cooperate closely throughout the inquiry.
Odbor zahteva posodobitev Sklepa št. 95/167/ES, Euratom, ESPJ in povečanje preiskovalnih pooblastil Evropskega parlamenta ter njihovo uskladitev s pooblastili večine nacionalnih parlamentov.
The committee requests that Decision 95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC be updated and Parliament's powers of inquiry be improved and aligned with those of the majority of the Member States' parliaments.
Odbor meni, da je nujno in v interesu državljanov EU, da imajo preiskovalni odbori Evropskega parlamenta pravico, da zahtevajo udeležbo prič s stalnim bivališčem ali bivališčem v Evropski uniji, ki morajo biti pripravljene, da v celoti in iskreno odgovarjajo na vprašanja članov odbora.
The committee considers it essential, in the interests of EU citizens, that Parliament's committees of inquiry should have the right to require the attendance of witnesses who are domiciled or resident within the European Union, and that they be required willingly, fully and truthfully to answer questions by members of the committee.
ANNEX 1: KRONOLOŠKI PREGLED
ANNEX 1: EQUI TIMELINE
KRONOLOŠKI PREGLED
EQUI TIMELINE
V krepkem tisku so: glavni dogodki
In bold: main events
§ 1762: Ustanovitev družbe Equitable Life.
§ 1762 Equitable Life founded.
§ 1913: Družba Equitable Life je začela prodajati pokojninske police.
§ 1913 Equitable Life started to sell pensions.
§ April 1951: Ustanovitev Odbora Millarda Tuckerja o obdavčitvi pokojninskih prejemkov.
§ April 1951 Establishment of Millard Tucker Committee on Taxation of Retirement Benefits.
Roy Ranson se je pridružil družbi Equitable Life.
Roy Ranson joins Equitable Life.
§ 1953: Objava (55) tabel za rentnike, ki so zagotovile nov aktuarski pristop k umrljivosti rentnikov.
§ 1953 Publication of a(55) Tables for Annuitants (CMI), providing a new actuarial approach to annuitants’ mortality.
§ Februar 1954: Objava poročila Tuckerjevega odbora o davčni obravnavi pokojninskega zavarovanja.
§ February 1954 Publication of the Tucker Committee report into the ’Taxation Treatment of Provisions for Retirement’.
§ 1956: Zakon o financah iz leta 1956, ki je razširil pravico samozaposlenih ljudeh za davčne olajšave za pokojninsko zavarovanje.
§ 1956 Finance Act 1956, extending the right to self-employed people to tax relief on retirement provision.
( Pozneje je bil vključen v Zakon o davku na dohodek iz leta 1970 in Zakon o davku od dobička pravnih oseb iz leta 1988.)
(Subsequently consolidated into the Income and Corporation Taxes Acts of 1970 and of 1988.)
§ 1957: Družba Equitable Life je prodala svojo prvo pokojninsko rento, ki je temeljila na (55) tabelah o umrljivosti in vsebovala stopnje zajamčenih rent.
§ 1957 Equitable Life sold its first retirement annuity (RAP), based on a(55) mortality tables and containing Rates of Guaranteed Annuity.
§ 1967: Maurice Ogborn je postal generalni direktor in aktuar družbe Equitable Life kot naslednik Henryja Tappendena.
§ 1967 Maurice Ogborn became the Society’s general manager and actuary in succession to Henry Tappenden.
§ 1970: Zakon Združenega kraljestva o financah iz leta 1970.
§ 1970 UK Finance Act 1970.
§ 1971: Družba Equitable Life je zajamčeno obrestno mero povečala za 3 % na leto.
§ 1971 Equitable increased the rate of guaranteed investment rate (GIR) to 3% per annum.
§ 15. maj 1971: Vodstvo se je strinjalo, da bo nadaljevalo z uvajanjem polic s klavzulo o soudeležbi pri dobičku zavarovalnice brez bonusov namestnega delovanja.
§ 15 May 1971 Management agreement to proceed with introduction of with profits policies with no reversionary bonus.
§ Oktober 1972: Ogborn je odstopil s položaja generalnega direktorja in aktuarja družbe Equitable Life; nadomestil ga je Barry Sherlock.
§ October 1972 Ogborn retired as the Society’s general manager and actuary; replaced by Barry Sherlock.
Ranson je napredoval v namestnika aktuarja.
Ranson promoted to deputy actuary.
§ 1973: Sprememba zakona o zavarovalnicah iz leta 1973: zajel je možnost neizpolnjevanja razumnih pričakovanj zavarovancev in potencialnih zavarovancev kot izhodišča za zakonodajne ukrepe.
§ 1973 Insurance Companies Amendment Act 1973: introduced the prospect of failure to meet the reasonable expectations of policyholders and potential policyholders as a trigger for regulatory action.
§ April 1973: Družba Equitable Life je uvedla nezajamčeni terminalni (pozneje končni) bonus.
§ April 1973 Equitable introduced a non-guaranteed terminal (later final) bonus.
§ 1974: Zakon o zavarovalnicah iz leta 1974, prečiščena obstoječa zakonodaja.
§ 1974 Insurance Companies Act 1974, consolidated existing legislation.
Oddelek 15 je določil zakonsko vlogo imenovanega aktuarja.
Section 15 defined the statutory role of the appointed actuary.
Sherlock je postal prvi imenovani aktuar družbe Equitable Life.
Sherlock became the Society’s first appointed actuary.
§ Avgust 1974: Ustanovljena je bila preiskovalna skupina za produkte pod predsedstvom Roya Ransona.
§ August 1974 Product Investigation Team (PIT) set up, under the chairmanship of Roy Ranson.
§ 1. maj 1975: Objava prve izdaje napotka 1 Inštituta in fakultete za aktuarstvo.
§ 1 May 1975 Publication of first edition of Institute and Faculty of Actuaries’ guidance note 1 (GN1).
§ Oktober 1975: Družba Equitable Life je povečala zagotovljen donos iz naložb na 3,5 % na leto in lastne obrestne mere na 7 %.
§ October 1975 Equitable increased the guaranteed investment return (GIR) to 3½% per annum and the interest rate in possession to 7%.
Prvotno je bil prvi 2,5 % na leto in druge 4 % na leto.
Originally these had been 2½% p.a. and 4% respectively.
§ 1978: Oddelek 22 Zakona o financah je zagotovil možnost odprtega trga, zato je lahko zavarovanec s pokojninsko rento polico z rento kupil od druge zavarovalnice.
§ 1978 Section 22 of the Finance Act allowed an open market option to be provided, so a pension policyholder could purchase an annuity from a different office.