natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo 22 uradnih jezikovnih različic, svoje delo pa je opravila na podlagi francoske različice, saj je bila francoščina izvorni jezik delovnega dokumenta. preučila predlog direktive Sveta, ki kodificira direktivo 90/434/ES Sveta z dne 23. julija 1990 o skupnem sistemu obdavčitve za združitve, delitve, delne delitve, prenose sredstev in zamenjave kapitalskih deležev družb iz različnih držav članic ter o prenosu statutarnega sedeža SE ali SCE iz ene države članice v drugo, in soglasno prišla do naslednjih ugotovitev:
The working party was able to refer to 22 language versions of the proposal and based its proceedings on the French original version of the working document. the proposal for a Council directive intended to codify Council Directive 90/434/EC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States and to the transfer of the registered office of an SE or SCE between Member States, the working party, by common accord, noted that:
1) Prvi stavek uvodne izjave 11 (ki se v besedilu predloga glasi: „Odločitev, da reorganizira poslovanje s prenosom svojega statutarnega sedeža, ne bi smele neupravičeno ovirati diskriminatorne davčne ovire”) se nadomesti s stavkom: „Odločitev, da reorganizira poslovanje s prenosom svojega statutarnega sedeža, ne bi smele neupravičeno ovirati diskriminatorna davčna pravila ali omejitve, kazni ali izkrivljanja nacionalnih davčnih zakonodaj, ki so v nasprotju z zakonodajo Skupnosti”.
1) In recital 11, the first sentence (which, as reproduced in the text of the proposal, reads as follows: ‘ The decision of an SE or SCE to reorganise its business by transferring its registered office should not be unduly hampered by tax obstacles ’) should be replaced by the following: ‘ The decision of an SE or SCE to reorganise its business by transferring its registered office should not be hampered by discriminatory tax rules or by restrictions, disadvantages, or distortions arising from national tax legislation which is contrary to Community law ’.
2) V točki m) priloge I bi morala biti grška beseda «εταιρείες» označena s posebnimi puščicami.
2) In Annex I, point m, the inserted Greek word ‘εταιρείες’ should have been placed between arrows to denote an adaptation.
pravni svetovalec namestnik generalnega direktorja
Jurisconsult Legal Adviser Acting Director-General
Sistem obdavčitve za združitve, delitve, prenose sredstev in zamenjave kapitalskih deležev družb iz različnih držav članic ter za prenos statutarnega sedeža (Kodificirana različica)
System of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States and to the transfer of the registered office of an SE or SCE between Member States (Codified version)
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................55
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 58
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................82
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...87
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0872 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0872 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0027/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0027/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0512/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0512/2008 ),
(1) Prosti pretok varnih in zdravstveno ustreznih živil je pomemben vidik notranjega trga in znatno prispeva k zdravju in dobremu počutju državljanov ter njihovim socialnim, kakor tudi gospodarskim interesom.
(1) The free movement of safe and wholesome food is an essential aspect of the internal market and contributes significantly to the health and well-being of citizens, as well as to their social and economic interests.
Razlike med nacionalnimi zakoni in drugimi predpisi o ocenjevanju varnosti in odobritvi novih živil lahko ovirajo njihov prosti pretok z ustvarjanjem pogojev nelojalne konkurence.
Differences between national laws, regulations and administrative provisions concerning the safety assessment and authorisation of novel foods may hinder their free movement, thereby creating unfair competition conditions.
(1) Pri izvajanju politike Skupnosti in ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti je treba zagotoviti visoko raven zaščite zdravja ljudi in varstva potrošnikov in tudi visoko raven dobrega počutja živali in varstva okolja.
(1) In implementing Community policy and having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, a high level of protection of human health and consumer protection should be guaranteed and also a high level of animal welfare and environmental protection.
Poleg tega je treba ves čas dosledno upoštevati preventivno načelo, kot je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o splošnih načelih in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in o postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane 1 .
At all times, moreover, the precautionary principle as laid down in Regulation (E C ) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety 1 , should be applied.
1 UL L 31, 1.2.2002, p.
1 OJ L 31 , 1.2.2002, p .
Poudarek mora biti na varnosti hrane in varstvu potrošnikov.
The emphasis should be on food safety and consumer protection.
Upoštevati je treba tudi varstvo zdravja živali in varstvo okolja.
Account should also be taken of protection of animal health and the environment.
Končno, previdnostno načelo je izrednega pomena.
Lastly, the precautionary principle is of the utmost importance.
(2) Pri izvajanju politik Skupnosti je treba zagotoviti visoko raven varovanja zdravja ljudi.
(2) A high level of human health protection should be assured in the pursuit of Community policies.
(2) Pri izvajanju politik Skupnosti je treba zagotoviti visoko raven varovanja zdravja ljudi , ki mora imeti prednost pred delovanjem notranjega trga .
(2) A high level of human health protection should be assured in the pursuit of Community policies and should be given priority over the functioning of the internal market .
Pri odobritvi novih živil bi moralo imeti prednost varovanje zdravja ljudi.
The human health protection should be considered as a priority in the authorisation of novel food.
(2a) V členu 13 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji je pojasnjeno, da Unija in države članice pri oblikovanju in izvajanju politik v celoti upoštevajo zahteve po dobrem počutju živali, saj so živali čuteča bitja.
( 2a ) Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union clarifies that the Union and the Member States shall pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals when formulating and implementing policies , since animals are sentient beings.
(2b) Standarde, opredeljene v zakonodaji EU, je treba uporabljati za vsa živila, ki se dajo na trg Skupnosti, vključno z živili, uvoženimi iz tretjih držav.
(2 b ) The standards defined in EU legislation must be applied to all food placed on the Community market, including food imported from third countries.
Ponoviti je treba, da standardi Skupnosti veljajo tudi za uvožena živila.
It should be re-iterated that the Community standards also apply to imported food.
(2c) Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 3. septembra 2008 o kloniranju živali za preskrbo s hrano pozval Komisijo, naj predstavi predloge, s katerimi se za preskrbo s hrano prepove (i) kloniranje živali, (ii) vzreja kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev, (iii) dajanje na trg mesa ali mlečnih izdelkov, pridobljenih iz kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev, ter (iv) uvoz kloniranih živali, njihovih potomcev, semena in zarodkov kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev, ter mesa ali mlečnih izdelkov, pridobljenih iz kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev.
( 2 c ) The European Parliament called on the Commission, in its resolution of 3 September 2008 on the cloning of animals for food supply , to submit proposals prohibiting for food supply purposes (i) the cloning of animals, (ii) the farming of cloned animals or their offspring, (iii) the placing on the market of meat or dairy products derived from cloned animals or their offspring and (iv) the importing of cloned animals, their offspring, semen and embryos from cloned animals or their offspring, and meat or dairy products derived from cloned animals or their offspring.
(2d) Znanstveni odbor Komisije za nastajajoča in na novo ugotovljena zdravstvena tveganja (ZONNUZT) je v svojem mnenju z dne 28.–29. septembra 2005 prišel do zaključka, „da obstajajo precejšne vrzeli v znanju, ki je potrebno za oceno tveganja.
( 2 d ) The Commission's Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) adopted on 28-29 September 2005 an opinion which concluded that there are ‘major gaps in the knowledge necessary for risk assessment.
Mednje sodijo opis značilnosti nanodelcev, odkrivanje in merjenje nanodelcev, odzivanje na odmerke, propadanje in obstojnost nanodelcev pri ljudeh in v okolju ter vsi vidiki toksikologije in okoljske toksikologije, ki so povezani z nanodelci“; poleg tega opozarja na ugotovitev znanstvenega odbora (ZONNUZT), da „obstoječe toksikološke in okoljske toksikološke metode morda ne zadostujejo pri iskanju odgovorov na vsa vprašanja, ki se porajajo v zvezi z nanodelci“;
These include nanoparticle characterisation, the detection and measurement of nanoparticles, the dose-response, fate, and persistence of nanoparticles in humans and in the environment, and all aspects of toxicology and environmental toxicology related to nanoparticles’; furthermore draws attention to the conclusion of SCENIHR that ‘existing toxicological and eco - toxicological methods may not be sufficient to address all of the issues arising in relation to nanoparticles’;
(4) Za zagotovitev kontinuitete Uredbe (ES) št. 258/97 je treba kot merilo, da se živilo šteje za novo, ohraniti neuporabo v pomembnem obsegu za prehrano ljudi v Skupnosti pred začetkom uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 258/97 15. maja 1997.
(4) In order to ensure continuity with Regulation (EC) No 258/97, the absence of a use for human consumption to a significant degree within the Community before the date of application of Regulation (EC) No 258/97, namely 15 May 1997, should be kept as criteria for a food to be considered as novel.
Uporaba v Skupnosti se nanaša na uporabo v državah članicah ne glede na datum njihovega pristopa k Evropski uniji.
A use within the Community refers to a use in the Member States, irrespective of the date of their accession to the European Union.
Ta predlog spremembe natančneje pojasnjuje obseg vpliva uredbe na notranji trg ter povečuje pravno varnost za udeležene stranke, zlasti v državah članicah srednje in vzhodne Evrope.
This amendment clarifies the extent of the regulation’s impact on the internal market and so increases legal certainty for the those concerned, particularly in the Member States in Central and Eastern Europe.
(5) Obstoječo opredelitev za novo živilo je treba pojasniti in posodobiti z zamenjavo obstoječih kategorij s sklicevanjem na splošno opredelitev za živilo iz Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane.
(5) The existing definition of novel food should be clarified and updated by replacing the existing categories, with a reference to the general definition of food in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety.
(5) Obstoječo opredelitev za novo živilo je treba pojasniti z razlago meril novosti , in posodobiti z zamenjavo obstoječih kategorij s sklicevanjem na splošno opredelitev za živilo iz Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane.
(5) The existing definition of novel food should be clarified, with an explanation of the criteria for novelty, and updated by replacing the existing categories, with a reference to the general definition of food in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety.
Da bi bila zakonodaja jasna, bi bilo treba razložiti merila novosti živila v besedilu ali uvodnih izjavah.
In order to make the legislation clear, there should be some explanation of the criteria for novelty of a food in the text itself or in the recitals.
(5a) V skladu z opredelitvijo te uredbe se za nova štejejo živila z novo ali namenoma spremenjeno prvotno molekulsko strukturo, živila, ki jih sestavljajo mikroorganizmi, glive ali alge ali so iz njih pridobljena, novi sevi mikroorganizmov brez preteklih izkušenj o varni uporabi, pa tudi koncentrati snovi, ki se naravno pojavijo v rastlinah.
( 5a ) Foods with a new or intentionally modified primary molecular structure, foods consisting of, or isolated from, micro-organisms, fungi or algae, new strains of micro-organism with no history of safe use as well as concentrates of substances that naturally occur in plants are considered as novel under the definition of this Regulation.
Predlog spremembe pojasnjuje, katere kategorije proizvodov so v vsakem primeru zajete v opredelitvi novega živila.
The amendment clarifies which product categories are in all circumstances covered by the definition of novel food.
Ta nepopoln seznam kategorij živil tako prispeva k pravni varnosti opredelitve novega živila, ki jo posodablja ta uredba.
This non-exhaustive list of food categories thus contributes to legal certainty of the definition of novel food as updated by this Regulation.
(6a) Kloniranje živali ni v skladu s točko 20 priloge Direktive Sveta 98/58/EC z dne 20. julija 1998 o zaščiti rejnih živali 1 , ki določa, da metode ekstenzivne in intenzivne reje, ki povzročajo ali lahko povzročijo trpljenje ali poškodbo katere koli zadevne živali, niso dovoljene.
(6 a ) The c loning of animals is incompatible with Council Directive 98/58/E C of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes 1 , p oint 20 of the Annex of which states that natural or artificial breeding procedures which cause or are likely to cause suffering or injury to any of the animals concerned must not be practised.
Živila, pridobljena iz kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev, se tako ne smejo uvrstiti na seznam Skupnosti.
Food from cloned animals or their descendant s must therefore not be placed on the Community list .
1 UL L 221, 8.8.1998, str.
1 OJ L 221 , 8.8.1998, p.
Številne znanstvene raziskave in mnenje evropske skupine za etiko kažejo, da kloniranje vodi do resnih težav z zdravjem in dobrim počutjem tako kloniranih živali kot tudi njihovih nadomestnih mater.
A wide range of scientific research and the Opinion of the European Group on Ethics show that cloning leads to serious health and welfare problems for both the cloned animals and their surrogate mothers.
Klonirani zarodki so pogosto večji od običajnih, kar vodi do težavnih rojstev in številnih porodov s carskim rezom.
Cloned foetuses are often larger than normal; this leads to difficult births and to many deliveries being by caesarean section.
Številni kloni poginejo med brejostjo ali v zgodnjih tednih življenja zaradi imunskih nepravilnosti, srčnožilne odpovedi, težav z dihanjem in anomalij ledvic.
Many clones die during pregnancy or in the early weeks of life from immune deficiencies, cardiovascular failure, respiratory problems and kidney abnormalities.
Težave z zdravjem in dobrim počutjem živali, ki jih povzroča kloniranje, pomenijo, da ta postopek ni združljiv z odstavkom 20 priloge Direktive Sveta 98/58/ES.
The animal health and welfare problems caused by cloning mean that this process is incompatible with paragraph 20 of the Annex to Council Directive 98/58/EC.
(6b) Poskusne metode, ki so zdaj na voljo, niso ustrezne za oceno tveganja, povezanega z nanomateriali.
(6b) Test methods currently available are not adequate for assessing the risks associated with nanomaterials.
Nujno je treba razviti poskusne metode, ki so posebej namenjene nanomaterialom in pri katerih se ne uporabljajo živali.
Nano-specific non-animal test methods should be developed as a matter of urgency .
Nanomateriale je treba ocenjevati na podlagi poskusov, ki so posebej namenjeni nanomaterialom in pri katerih se ne uporabljajo živali.
Nanomaterials should be assessed on the basis of nano-specific non-animal tests.
Da se zaščiti zdravje ljudi in preprečijo poskusi na živalih, bi bilo treba prepovedati uporabo nanomaterialov v živilih, dokler niso na voljo poskusi, ki so posebej namenjeni nanomaterialom in pri katerih se ne uporabljajo živali.
Until nano-specific non-animal tests are available for an adequate safety assessment of nanomaterials in foods, their use should be prohibited in order to protect human health and to prevent animal testing.
Ker znanstveni odbor Evropske agencije za varnost hrane v svojem mnenju1 z dne 15. julija 2008 ugotavlja, da sta „zdravje in dobro počutje precejšnjega dela klonov ... pogosto zelo in življenjsko ogrožena“.
Whereas the Scientific Committee of the European Food Safety Authority concluded in its Opinion 1 of 15 July 2008 that ‘ the health and welfare of a significant proportion of clones … have been found to be adversely affected, often severely and with a fatal outcome’’.
Mnenji Evropske agencije za varnost živil in evropske skupine za etiko v znanosti in novih tehnologijah kažeta, da kloniranje vodi do resnih težav z zdravjem in dobrim počutjem kloniranih živali in njihovih nadomestnih mater.
The Opinions of the European Food Safety Authority and the European Group of Ethics in Science and New Technologies show that cloning leads to serious health and welfare problems for cloned animals and their surrogate dams.
(6d) Nanomateriali v živilski embalaži bi morali biti navedeni na seznamu dovoljenih nanomaterialov, skupaj z mejno količino teh snovi, ki lahko preide v ali na živilske proizvode v tovrstni embalaži.
(6d) Nanomaterials present in food packaging should be entered on a list of approved nanomaterials, accompanied by a limit on migration into or onto the food products contained in such packaging.
Embalažo iz nanomaterialov, ki pride v stik z živilskimi proizvodi, je treba odobriti.
Packaging composed of nanomaterials which are in contact with foods should be subject to authorisation.
(6e) Živila, pridobljena iz kloniranih živali in njihovih potomcev, so izvzeta iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
(6e) F oods derived from cloned animals and their offspring should , however, be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Obravnavati jih je treba v posebni uredbi, sprejeti s soodločanjem, ne pa z enotnim postopkom.
They should be dealt with in a specific regulation, adopted under the codecision procedure, and not be subject to the common procedure.
Dokler ta uredba ne začne veljati, Komisija predloži ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
Pending the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission should put forward a corresponding legislative proposal.
Dokler ne začne veljati uredba o kloniranih živalih, je treba uvesti moratorij za dajanje na trg živil, proizvedenih iz kloniranih živali in njihovih potomcev.
Pending the entry into force of a regulation on cloned animals, a moratorium should be imposed on the placing on the market of foods manufactured from cloned animals and their offspring.
(7) Po potrebi je treba sprejeti izvedbene ukrepe, da se določijo merila za olajšanje ocene, ali so se živila uporabljala v pomembnem obsegu za prehrano ljudi v Skupnosti pred 15. majem 1997.
(7) If necessary , implementing measures should be adopted to provide for criteria in order to facilitate the assessment of whether a food has been used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Community before 15 May 1997.
Če se je živilo do navedenega dne uporabljalo izključno kot prehransko dopolnilo, kot je opredeljeno v Direktivi 2002/46/ES, se lahko po tem dnevu daje na trg za isto uporabo in se ne šteje za novo živilo.
If a food has been used exclusively as or in a food supplement, as defined in Directive 2002/46/EC, prior that date, it can be placed on the market after that date for the same use without being considered as a novel food.
Vendar se ta uporaba živila kot prehranskega dopolnila ali v prehranskem dopolnilu ne sme upoštevati za oceno, ali so se živila uporabljala v pomembnem obsegu za prehrano ljudi v Skupnosti pred 15. majem 1997.
However, that use as or in a food supplement should not be taken into account for the assessment whether it has been used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Community before 15 May 1997.
Zato je treba v skladu s to uredbo odobriti druge uporabe zadevnih živil, npr. druge uporabe, ki niso prehranska dopolnila.
Therefore, other uses of the food concerned, e.g. other than food supplement uses, have to be authorised in accordance with this Regulation.
(7) Treba je sprejeti izvedbene ukrepe, da se določijo nadaljnja merila za olajšanje ocene, ali so se živila uporabljala v pomembnem obsegu za prehrano ljudi v Skupnosti pred 15. majem 1997.
(7) I mplementing measures should be adopted to provide for further criteria in order to facilitate the assessment of whether a food has been used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Community before 15 May 1997.
Treba je sprejeti izvedbene ukrepe za nadaljnji opis meril novosti.
It is necessary that implementing measures be adopted in order to further describe the criteria for novelty.
Dodati je treba besedo „nadaljnja“, saj predlogi sprememb uvodne izjave 6 že vsebujejo nekaj pojasnil.
The word further should be added as some explanation is already given with the amendments to Recital 6.
(8a) Določbe direktive 2001/83/ES o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v humani medicini 1 bi bilo treba uporabljati povsod, kjer bi se proizvod ob upoštevanju vseh njegovih značilnosti lahko opredelil kot „zdravilo“ ali kot proizvod, katerega uporabo ureja druga zakonodaja Skupnosti.
(8a) The provisions of Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use 1 should apply where, taking into account all its characteristics, a product may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of a product covered by other Community legislation.
Če država članica v skladu z Direktivo 2001/83/ES ugotovi, da je proizvod zdravilo, lahko skladno z zakonodajo Skupnosti omeji dajanje tovrstnega proizvoda na trg.
In this respect, a Member State may, if it establishes in accordance with Directive 2001/83/EC that a substance is a medicinal product, restrict the placing on the market of such product in accordance with Community law.