natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Maria Badia i Cutchet, Zoltán Bagó, Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Piotr Borys, Jean-Marie Cavada, Silvia Costa, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Mary Honeyball, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Morten Løkkegaard, Emma McClarkin, Doris Pack, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Emil Stojanov (Emil Stoyanov), Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Sabine Verheyen in Milan Zver
Maria Badia i Cutchet, Zoltán Bagó, Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Piotr Borys, Jean-Marie Cavada, Silvia Costa, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Mary Honeyball, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Morten Løkkegaard, Emma McClarkin, Doris Pack, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Emil Stoyanov, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Sabine Verheyen, Milan Zver
Nessa Childers, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Iosif Matula, Francisco José Millán Mon in Monika Smolková
Nessa Childers, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Iosif Matula, Francisco José Millán Mon, Monika Smolková
o petem kohezijskem poročilu Komisije in strategiji za kohezijsko politiko po letu 2013
on the Commission’s fifth Cohesion Report and the strategy for post-2013 cohesion policy
Veronica Lope Fontagné, Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve
Veronica Lope Fontagné, Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve (*) .............................24
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (*) .........26
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor .............................................................31
OPINION of the Committee on Budgetary Control ........................................33
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................34
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ...36
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................38
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................41
(*) Pridruženi odbor - Člen 50 poslovnika
(*) Associated committee - Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
– ob upoštevanju petega poročila Komisije z dne 9. novembra 2010 z naslovom „Sklepi petega poročila o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji: prihodnost kohezijske politike” ( KOM(2010)0642 ) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklepi),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 9 November 2010 entitled ‘Conclusions of the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion: the future of cohesion policy’ ( COM(2010)0642 ) (hereinafter ‘the conclusions’),
– ob upoštevanju petega poročila Komisije o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji z naslovom „Vlaganje v prihodnost Evrope” z dne 9. novembra 2010 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: 5. kohezijsko poročilo),
– having regard to the Commission’s fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, entitled ‘Investing in Europe’s future’, of 9 November 2010 (hereinafter ‘the fifth Cohesion Report’),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1783/1999
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Regional Development Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1783/1999
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1081/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem socialnem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/1999
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1082/2006 z dne 5. julija 2006 o ustanovitvi evropskega združenja za teritorialno sodelovanje (EZTS)
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC)
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu
– having regard to Council Regulation No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1084/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o ustanovitvi Kohezijskega sklada in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1164/94
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006 of 11 July 2006 establishing a cohesion fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1164/94
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1085/2006 z dne 17. julija 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 of 17 July 2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA)
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1906/2006 z dne 8. decembra 2006o določitvi pravil za udeležbo podjetij, raziskovalnih središč in univerz pri ukrepih v okviru Sedmega okvirnega programa in razširjanju rezultatov raziskav
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of 18 December 2006 laying down the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the Seventh Framework Programme and for the dissemination of research results
UL L 391, 30.12.2006, str.1. ,
OJ L 391, 30.12.2006, p.1 ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2007 o posledicah prihodnjih širitev za učinkovitost kohezijske politike
– having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2007 on the consequences of future enlargements on the effectiveness of cohesion policy
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o prispevku kohezijske politike k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in ciljev strategije EU 2020
– having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on the contribution of the cohesion policy to the achievement of Lisbon and the EU 2020 objectives
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. septembra 2010 o evropski strategiji za gospodarski in družbeni razvoj gorskih regij, otokov in redko poseljenih območij
– having regard to its resolution of 22 September 2010 on the European strategy for the economic and social development of mountain regions, islands and sparsely populated areas
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0341 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-(2010)0341 ,
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0356 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-(2010)0356. ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o prihodnosti Evropskega socialnega sklada
– having regard to its resolution of 7 October 2010 on the future of the European Social Fund
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0357 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-(2010)0357. ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne ... o trenutnem stanju in prihodnji sinergiji ESRR in drugih strukturnih skladov za večjo učinkovitost
– having regard to its resolution of .. on the state of play and future synergies for increased effectiveness between the ERDF and other structural funds
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)000. (poročilo A7-0141/2011 bo sprejeto na drugem junijskem zasedanju). ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)000. (report A7-0141/2011 to be adopted at June II). ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. maja 2004 z naslovom „Okrepljeno partnerstvo za najbolj oddaljene regije” ( KOM(2004)0343 ) in sporočila Komisije z dne 17. oktobra 2008 z naslovom „Najbolj oddaljene regije: prednost Evrope“ ( KOM(2008)0642 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 26 May 2004 entitled ‘A stronger partnership for the outermost regions’ (COM (2004)0343) and the Commission communication of 17 October 2008 entitled ‘The outermost regions: an asset for Europe’ ( COM(2008)0642 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 3. marca 2010 z naslovom „Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 6. oktobra 2010 z naslovom „Prispevek regionalne politike k pametni rasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020“ ( KOM(2010)0553 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 6 October 2010 entitled ‘Regional policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020’ ( COM(2010)0553 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. januarja 2011 z naslovom „Prispevek regionalne politike k trajnostni rasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020“ ( KOM(2011)0017 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication 26 January 2011 entitled ‘Regional policy contributing to sustainable growth in Europe 2020’ ( COM(2011)0017 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za splošne zadeve z dne 21. februarja 2011 o petem poročilu o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji (6738/11),
– having regard to the General Affairs Council’s conclusions of 21 February 2011 on the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion (6738/11),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 1. aprila 2011 o petem poročilu o koheziji (CdR 369/2010),
– having regard to the Committee of the Regions’ opinion of 1 April 2011 on the fifth Cohesion Report (CdR 369/2010),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za proračunski nadzor in Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A7-0222/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ( A7-0222/2011 ),
A. ker kohezijska politika EU odločilno prispeva k opaznemu povečanju produktivnosti v vseh regijah Unije v preteklem in tekočem obdobju financiranja; ker je očitno, da naknadne ocene kažejo tudi na občutno zmanjšanje ekonomskih, socialnih in regionalnih razlik; ker ta razvoj pozitivno vpliva tudi na socialno varnost in naložbe v varstvo okolja,
A. whereas EU cohesion policy has contributed greatly to the increased productivity achieved by all regions of the Union during the previous and current funding periods; whereas it is striking that ex-post evaluations have also shown a significant reduction of economic, social and regional disparities; whereas these developments are having equally positive effects on social security and on investment in environmental protection,
B. ker je bila kohezijska politika ustvarjena kot nasprotje enotnega trga in za pospeševanje razvoja inovativne in solidarne Evrope, ki ščiti pred izzivi, povezanimi z globalizacijo, demografskimi spremembami ter varovanjem virov in ker je treba izkoristiti lokalne potenciale vseh regij, da se okrepita tako rast kot tudi regionalna in socialna kohezija,
B. whereas cohesion policy was intended to be a counterpart to the single market and to foster the development of an innovative and protective Europe based on solidarity in the face of the challenges associated with globalisation, demographic change and resource conservation, and whereas the intrinsic potential of all regions should be exploited to boost growth and regional and social cohesion,
C. ker je kohezijska politika za državljane izjemno pomembna, saj prinaša Evropo v vsakodnevno življenje ter zagotavlja njeno otipljivost in prepoznavnost v vsej EU,
C. whereas cohesion policy is an issue of genuine relevance to citizens, bringing Europe into people’s daily lives and making it tangible and visible across the EU,
D. ker sta se kohezijska in strukturna politika v kriznih razmerah izkazali kot prilagodljivi in sta lahko odločilno prispevali k različnim nacionalnim načrtom za oživitev gospodarstva in programom usposabljanja in ker je pomembno ohraniti to prilagodljivost,
D. whereas the cohesion and structural policies have proved flexible in crisis situations and have made a crucial contribution to various national economic stimulus and training programmes, and whereas it is important to maintain this flexibility,
E. ker evropska strukturna politika pomembno prispeva k premagovanju gospodarske in finančne krize, saj njena usmeritev v inovacije in odpravljanje razlik evropskim regijam odločilno spodbuja k izboljšanju infrastrukture, krepitvi regionalne inovativnosti ter okoljsko trajnostnemu razvoju,
E. whereas European structural policy is making a major contribution towards overcoming the economic and financial crisis, as it tends to be oriented towards innovation and removing disparities, strongly encouraging European regions to upgrade infrastructure, increase regional innovation potential and boost environmentally sustainable development,
F. ker se je usmeritev strukturnih skladov na cilje lizbonske strategije izkazala kot dobra, kar dokazujejo visoke stopnje odobritev za sprejem obveznosti pri ciljih „konvergenca“ ter „regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje“, in ker je 20 % projektov evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja v skladu z lizbonskimi cilji,
F. whereas gearing the Structural Funds to the Lisbon Strategy objectives has proved effective, as is evident from the impressive commitment rates for the Convergence and Regional Competitiveness and Employment objectives, and whereas 20% of European Territorial Cooperation projects are in keeping with the Lisbon aims,
G. ker je cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja spodbujati ozemlja in regije k sodelovanju, da bi se skupaj odzvali na skupne izzive, zmanjšali fizične, upravne in zakonske ovire, ki ovirajo to sodelovanje, ter omilili „učinek meje“,
G. whereas territorial cooperation aims to help territories and regions work together in tackling their common challenges, reduce the physical, administrative and regulatory barriers to such cooperation and lessen the ‘border effect’,
H. ker delnega neuspeha lizbonske strategije ni povzročilo nezadostno izvajanje kohezijske politike ampak predvsem odsotnost upravljanja na več ravneh ter sprejemanja te strategije na regionalni in lokalni ravni, posledice finančne krize in pomanjkljivo izvajanje notranjega trga, premajhna proračunska disciplina in neprimerni makroekonomski okvirni pogoji v posameznih državah članicah;
H. whereas the partial failure of the Lisbon Strategy is due not to inadequate implementation of cohesion policy but rather to the lack of multi-level governance and of ownership of this strategy by the regional and local levels, the effects of the financial crisis, imperfect implementation of the single market, slack budgetary discipline and inadequate macroeconomic framework conditions in individual Member States,
I. ker so se stopnje napak in zloraba sredstev v zadnjih obdobjih financiranja občutno zmanjšale; ker je strukturna politika žal še naprej področje z visoko stopnjo takih nepravilnosti in ker nekatere države članice še vedno nimajo učinkovitih mehanizmov proti zlorabi sredstev in za izterjavo nepravilno izplačanih zneskov; ker se nepravilnosti iz malomarnosti ali namenoma ne sporočajo in ker je treba upoštevati, da je mogoče velik del napak kohezijske politike pripisati zakonskim zahtevam zunaj njenega okvira, na področjih, kot so javna naročila, okolje in državna pomoč,
I. whereas the error rates and misuse of funds has been significantly lower in the most recent funding periods; whereas, regrettably, structural policy nonetheless remains an area with a high level of irregularities in this respect, and some Member States still lack effective machinery for countering the misuse of funding and recovering money wrongly paid out; whereas irregularities may not be reported, either through negligence or deliberately, and whereas it must be noted that a significant part of the errors in the cohesion policy sphere may be attributed to legislative requirements outside cohesion policy, in areas such as public procurement, environment and state aids,
J. ker se je obstoječi sistem ciljev kohezijske in strukturne politike (konvergenca, regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje ter evropsko čezmejno sodelovanje) v kombinaciji z upravljanjem na več ravneh, horizontalnimi cilji in možnostjo načrtovanja na osnovi zanesljivega financiranja in sprejetega programskega obdobja (sedem let) na splošno izkazal kot dober, ker pa so nastale znatne zamude pri pripravi programa, ki so posledica predolgih finančnih in zakonodajnih pogajanj v postopku odločanja EU ter bistvenih sprememb pravil, ki veljajo za kohezijsko politiko,
J. whereas the existing system of cohesion and structural policy objectives (Convergence, Regional Competitiveness and Employment, and European Territorial Cooperation), combined with a multi-level governance approach, horizontal objectives and security to plan on the basis of reliable funding and an agreed time frame (seven years), has, overall, proved its worth, but whereas there have been considerable delays in programme planning as a result of protracted financial and legislative negotiations in the EU decision-making process and substantial changes in the rules applying to cohesion policy,
K. ker trajna podpora in razvoj konvergenčnih regij pozitivno vplivata na njihovo tržno povpraševanje po blagu in storitvah, s tem pa so dokazano povezani pozitivni učinki tudi za bogatejše države EU,
K. whereas sustained support for and development of the convergence regions has a positive impact on the demand for goods and services on their markets and thus has demonstrably beneficial effects on the wealthier EU Member States as well,
L. ker regionalno-gospodarska in socialna neravnovesja, prikrajšanost, povezana z lego nekaterih regij (zlasti najbolj oddaljenih regij), ter posebne strukturne težave in potreba po prilagoditvi novim izzivom še naprej terjajo celovito in s sredstvi podprto kohezijsko politiko EU v vseh evropskih regijah; ker to zahteva tudi Lizbonska pogodba,
L. whereas a comprehensive and well-funded EU cohesion policy in all European regions continues to be essential, given the imbalances between regional economies and in social terms and the geographical disadvantages of certain regions (particularly the outermost regions), as well as specific structural problems and the need to adapt to new challenges; whereas it is also a requirement under the Lisbon Treaty,
M. ker kohezijska politika glede na njen strateški pomen za prihodnost ne sme postati prilagodljiva spremenljivka na prihodnjih pogajanjih o proračunu,
M. whereas, given its strategic importance for the future, cohesion policy must not become an adjustment variable in future budget negotiations,
Dodana vrednost in prednostni cilji kohezijske politike
Cohesion policy added value and investment priorities
6. poudarja, da kljub trendu zmanjševanja razlik med regijami še naprej obstajajo velika neravnovesja, ki se v nekaterih državah članicah in med njimi celo povečujejo, ter da se mora kohezijska politika zato še naprej osredotočati na zmanjševanje razlik in izvajanje skladnega in trajnostnega razvoja v vseh evropskih regijah, ne glede na to, v kateri državi članici obstajajo;
Emphasises that, despite the trend towards a narrowing of inter-regional disparities, major imbalances still exist – and among/in some Member States are actually growing, inter alia as a result of the economic and financial crisis – and that cohesion policy must therefore continue to concentrate on reducing disparities and implementing harmonious and sustainable development for all regions of the Union, regardless of the Member State in which they are located;
10. poudarja, da se mora kohezijska politika še naprej osredotočati na teritorialno kohezijo in da je Lizbonska pogodba slednjo dodala ciljema ekonomske in socialne kohezije; ugotavlja, da je ta cilj še naprej neločljivo povezan z izzivi ekonomske in socialne kohezije in da krepi evropsko dodano vrednost kohezijske politike; poudarja, da je teritorialna kohezija pomembna tudi na podregionalni ravni, zlasti v mestnih območjih (mestne četrti s težavami, nenadzorovano širjenje mest), in to celo v regijah, ki se štejejo za bogate;
Emphasises that cohesion policy must continue to focus on territorial cohesion and points out that the Lisbon Treaty added the objective of territorial cohesion to those of economic and social cohesion; affirms that this aim remains indissociable from the challenges of economic and social cohesion and strengthens the European added value of cohesion policy; emphasises that ‘territorial cohesion’ is also relevant at the sub-regional level, particularly in urban areas (urban districts facing difficulties, uncontrolled urban sprawl), even within regions considered to be rich;
13. poudarja ključno vlogo mestnih območij in regij, vključno z glavnimi mesti in njihovimi regijami, za doseganje ekonomskih, ekoloških in socialnih ciljev strategije Evropa 2020; podpira dinamični proces, ki se je začel v prejšnjem programskem obdobju v korist celovitih programov za mestna okolja, in poudarja pomen preskusov, ki se izvajajo; poziva k podpori vzorčnih idej in projektov na podlagi celostnih lokalnih razvojnih načrtov ter vzajemno koristno okrepljeno povezavanje mest in podeželja, ki je funkcionalno povezano z mesti; meni, da je boljša kohezija med temi območji posebej pomembna za reševanje težav tistih, kjer živijo prikrajšane skupnosti; pri tem poudarja, da največje družbenogospodarske razlike pogosto obstajajo v mestih ter da je mogoče mesta s prikrajšanimi in revnimi območji najti tudi v bogatih regijah;
Stresses the key role of urban areas and regions – including capital cities and their regions – in achieving the economic, environmental and social objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy; supports the dynamic process launched during the previous programming period for Integrated Urban Programmes and stresses the importance of the experiments currently under way; calls for support for ideas and projects which can serve as models, on the basis of integrated place-based development plans, and for the mutually beneficial upgrading of links between towns and cities and the rural areas functionally linked to them; considers that greater cohesion between these areas is of special importance in addressing problems of areas with disadvantaged communities; stresses, in this context, that the greatest socioeconomic differences often exist within cities and that cities with deprived areas and pockets of poverty are also to be found in wealthy regions;
15. zavrača uporabo obveznih kvot zlasti za nacionalne dodelitve sredstev programov ESS/ESRR, lokalni razvoj in razvoj mest, podeželska območja in druge vrste prostorskih aglomeracij ali funkcionalnih območij, saj bi to zagotavljalo večjo kritično maso posegov; meni, da je obvezna določitev upravičenih mestnih in drugih območij že v operativnih programih možnost, ki bi jo bilo treba prednostno uporabljati, kadar ta način zagotavlja dodano vrednost in koncentracijo intenzivnosti pomoči, ter da se je treba o tem pogajati na podlagi načel upravljanja na več ravneh; meni, da je treba državam članicam in regijam pri tem dodeliti večjo odgovornost pri izvedbi konkurenčnih javnih natečajev, ki bodo upoštevali uspešnost;
Rejects the use of obligatory quotas, in particular for national allocations under ESF/ERDF programmes, for local and urban development, for rural areas and for other types of spatial agglomerations or functional areas, as this could ensure a larger critical mass of interventions; considers that the requirement to specify at operational programme level which urban and other areas are to be eligible for support is an option that should be prioritised wherever this method will ensure added value and concentration of aid intensity, and that this needs to be negotiated on the basis of the principles of multi-level governance; takes the view that the Member States and regions should to be given more responsibility to organise competitive and performance-based selection procedures in this respect as well;