natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija je torej odložila dokončanje predloga za makrofinančno pomoč zaradi dejstva, da se ta pomoč lahko dodeli le kot dopolnilno financiranje sredstev iz MDS.
Therefore the Commission postponed the finalisation of its proposal for MFA, due to the fact that it can only be provided as complementary financing to IMF funding.
Gospodarski položaj Gruzije se je nato znova poslabšal, zato so gruzijske oblasti sklenile poiskati morebitno zunanje financiranje.
However, subsequently Georgia’s economic situation worsened again and the Georgian authorities decided to seek potential external financing.
Ob upoštevanju drugega in tretjega pregleda aranžmaja "stand-by" (SBA) (marca in avgusta 2009) ter dejstva, da je treba veliko donatorske podpore še potrditi ali pa določiti njen časovni razpored, je Komisija sklenila potrditi obljubo o makrofinančni pomoči, dano na konferenci donatorjev, da bi pomagala Gruziji izpolniti njene potrebe po financiranju.
Considering the second and the third review of the SBA (in March and August 2009 respectively) and considering that much of the donor support still needs to be confirmed or its timing needs to be clarified, the Commission decided to confirm the pledge of MFA made at the donors’ conference in order to help Georgia meet its financing needs.
Predlog o makrofinančni pomoči (kot vsi predhodni predlogi o makrofinančni pomoči) je bil predložen Parlamentu v skladu s členom 308 pogodbe o ES, tj. v okviru postopka posvetovanja.
This MFA proposal (as all past MFA proposals) has been referred to the Parliament under Article 308 of the EC Treaty, i.e. under consultation procedure.
Sedanji predlog je Komisija sprejela 16. oktobra 2009 (in predložila Parlamentu 20. oktobra 2009).
The current proposal was adopted by the Commission on 16 October 2009 (and transferred to Parliament on 20 October 2009).
Ker pa naj bi se prvi obrok izplačal že pred koncem leta 2009, mora Svet sprejeti svoj sklep pred koncem leta 2009, Parlament pa svoje mnenje še prej (Komisija je neuradno nakazala, naj ga sprejme na plenarnem zasedanju 23.–26. novembra 2009).
However, as the first instalment is planned to be disbursed already before the end of 2009, the Council has to adopt its Decision before the end of 2009, and Parliament therefore its opinion even earlier (informally the Commission has indicated that it should be adopted at plenary session of 23-26 November 2009).
Tako je imel Parlament dejansko manj kot mesec in pol časa za sprejetje stališča (pri čemer se Svet do trenutka, ko je poročevalec zaključeval pripravo tega osnutka poročila, sploh še ni uradno posvetoval s Parlamentom), to pa je v zakonodajnem postopku enostavno nesprejemljivo.
Thus, the Parliament has been effectively given less than a month and a half for adopting its position (whereas the Council has at the time of finalising this draft report by your rapporteur not even officially consulted Parliament yet) and that is simply not acceptable in a legislative procedure.
Tudi če bi Parlament na primer oporekal osnutku izvedbenih ukrepov Komisije v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom, rok za to ni krajši od treh mesecev
For example, even for opposing Commission's draft implementing measures under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny the deadline for Parliament is not less than three months
Čeprav priprava takšnih predlogov ni odvisna le od Komisije, je Komisija dobro vedela, da bi se prva tranša morala izplačati že leta 2009 in da bi bilo treba sklep v zvezi s tem sprejeti pravočasno pred koncem leta.
Even if preparation of such proposals does not depend on the Commission alone, the Commission knew fully well that the first tranche should be disbursed already in 2009 and thus that the respective Decision would have to be adopted in sufficient time before the year's end.
Če sklep ne bo sprejet do konca leta 2009, bi to pomenilo, da sredstva ES ne bodo prerazporejena v proračun Gruzije v tem proračunskem letu.
At the same time, if the Decision is not adopted by the end of 2009, it would mean that EC funds would not be transferred to the Georgia's budget this financial year.
Glede na dejanske okoliščine in strateški pomen, ki ga EU pripisuje Gruziji v okviru evropske sosedske politike in pred kratkim vzpostavljenega vzhodnega partnerstva, bo poročevalec storil vse, kar je v njegovi moči, da bi izpolnil zahtevo Komisije v zvezi s časovno omejitvijo.
Considering the factual circumstances and Georgia's strategic importance to the EU in the context of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and the newly established Eastern Partnership, your rapporteur could therefore do his utmost to accommodate Commission's request regarding timing.
Ne zato, ker bi bil predlog direktive popoln, pač pa zato, ker se je poročevalec znašel v precej težavnem položaju.
Not because the proposal for the Decision would be perfect, but because your rapporteur finds himself in a very difficult position.
Prvič bi se lahko sprejetje poročila s predlogi sprememb ob trenutnem časovnem razporedu s postopkovnega vidika lahko izkazalo za nemogoče in bi lahko pomenilo, da sredstva ne bi bila prerazporejena v gruzijski proračun v letu 2009.
Firstly, from procedural point of view, adoption of a report with amendments might turn out to be impossible under the current timetable and could thus mean no transfer of funds to the Georgia's budget in 2009.
Poročevalec se na primer ne more strinjati z izjavo, da „ Pogodba za sprejem tega sklepa ne predvideva drugih pooblastil kot tistih, ki so določena v členu 308 “ (uvodna izjava 10).
For example, your rapporteur cannot agree with the statement that " the Treaty does not provide for the adoption of this Decision powers other than those of Article 308 " (recital 10).
P5_TA(2003)0233 . opozoril na neustreznost člena 308 in izrazil obžalovanje nad odločitvijo, da se takšna izjava priloži Pogodbi iz Nice.
P5_TA(2003)0233 . referred to Article 308 as inadequate and expressed its regrets over the decision to include such a Declaration in the Treaty of Nice.
Obenem vaš poročevalec meni, da bi utegnilo biti potrebnih več predlogov sprememb za izboljšanje jasnosti, preglednosti in odgovornosti predloga (v smislu pogojenosti, uporabe zunanjih revizorjev za neodvisno ocenjevanje, posebnih zahtev za gruzijsko vlado itd.), ki bi na primer določali, da je treba neodvisno naknadno vrednotenje makrofinančne pomoči za Gruzijo iz Sklepa Sveta 2006/41/ES z dne 24. januarja 2006 zaključiti pred začetkom izvajanja nove pomoči v okviru sedanjega predloga.
At the same time your rapporteur is of the opinion that several amendments might be necessary in order to improve the clarity, transparency and accountability of the proposal (in terms of conditionality, use of external auditors for independent assessment, specific requests to Georgian government etc), for example setting out that an independent ex post evaluation of the MFA to Georgia provided under Council Decision 2006/41/EC of 24 January 2006 should be completed before the start of implementation of new assistance under the current proposal.
Ob upoštevanju poročila neodvisne mednarodne misije za ugotavljanje dejstev glede spora v Gruziji
Namely, having regard to the Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia
http://www.ceiig.ch/Report.html iz septembra 2009 (Tagliavinijino poročilo) se poročevalcu porajajo pomisleki v zvezi s proračunsko pomočjo EU na eni in domnevnim povišanjem obrambnega proračuna Gruzije za leto 2008 na drugi strani.
http://www.ceiig.ch/Report.html of September 2009 (Tagliavini Report), your rapporteur has concerns about EU budgetary assistance on one hand, and about the alleged increases of the Georgian 2008 defence budget on the other.
Vendar pa je leta 2008 vojaški spopad med Rusijo in Gruzijo še okrepil potrebo po pomoči na področju prednostnih nalog, opredeljenih v akcijskem načrtu evropske sosedske politike, to pa ne pomeni le pomoči za makrofinančno stabilizacijo ter saniranje in okrevanje gospodarstva, pač pa tudi pomoč za ponovno naselitev notranje razseljenega prebivalstva, demokratični razvoj, miroljubno rešitev gruzijskih notranjih sporov ipd.
However, the 2008 military conflict between Russia and Georgia has further increased the need for support in the priorities identified in the ENP Action Plan, and that means not only assistance for macro-financial stabilisation and economic rehabilitation and recovery, but also support for resettlement of internally displaced persons (IDPs), for democratic development, for peaceful settlement of Georgia's internal conflicts, etc.
Gruzija tako sicer potrebuje pomoč EU, vendar je bistvenega pomena, da Komisija v memorandum o soglasju in sporazum o donaciji vključi ustrezne pogoje, s katerimi bo zagotovila, da bo pomoč dejansko porabljena za kar je namenjena, ne pa v vojaške namene.
Therefore, Georgia needs our assistance but it is of utmost importance that the Commission includes adequate conditions in the Memorandum of Understanding and the Grant Agreement, ensuring that this assistance is really going to be used for what it is intended for and not for military purposes.
Čeprav se poročevalec popolnoma strinja, da je treba Gruziji zagotoviti izjemno makrofinančno pomoč, je imel težko izbiro.
Therefore, while entirely in agreement with the need to provide Georgia with exceptional MFA, your rapporteur had a difficult choice to make.
Potreben je okvir soodločanja, ki bo urejal dodeljevanje makrofinančne pomoči in izboljšal preglednost, odgovornost ter sisteme spremljanja in poročanja.
A co-decided framework regulation on MFA is necessary in order to enhance transparency, accountability, monitoring and reporting systems.
Komisija mora izboljšati zlasti poročanje Parlamentu o dejanskem izvajanju tega instrumenta pomoči in mu posredovati naknadno poročilo o oceni (poleg letnega poročanja, predvidenega v členu 5 tega predloga).
In particular, the Commission should improve its reporting to Parliament as concerns the actual implementation of this aid instrument and provide Parliament with an ex post evaluation report (in addition to the annual reporting foreseen in Article 5 of the proposal).
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o zagotavljanju makrofinančne pomoči Srbiji
on the proposal for a Council decision providing macro-financial assistance to Serbia
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2009)0513 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2009)0513 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0270/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0270/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7‑0061/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A7‑0061/2009 ),
Komisija predlaga zagotovitev makrofinančne pomoči Srbiji v višini do 200 milijonov EUR v obliki posojila, ki si ga lahko Komisija v skladu s pooblastili sposodi na finančnih trgih ali od finančnih institucij.
The Commission proposes to provide MFA to Serbia amounting up to EUR 200 million in the form of a loan, that the Commission shall be empowered to borrow on the capital markets or from financial institutions.
Pomoč bo predvidoma na voljo v dveh obrokih v letu 2010.
The assistance is planned to be made available in two instalments during 2010.
Z njo se želi podpreti gospodarsko stabilizacijo Srbije ter financirati njene zunanje plačilne bilance in proračunske potrebe, kot jih je opredelil Mednarodni denarni sklad (MDS).
It aims at supporting Serbia's economic stabilisation and financing its external balance-of-payments and budgetary needs as identified by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Predlagana pomoč bo podprla stabilizacijski program organov, katerega cilj je zagotoviti stabilne davčne in zunanje račune, in pomagala Srbiji, da se spopade s posledicami svetovne gospodarske in finančne krize.
The proposed assistance will support the authorities' stabilisation programme with a view to ensure sustainable fiscal and external accounts and contributes also to helping Serbia to meet the consequences of the global economic and financial crisis.
Vpliv svetovne gospodarske krize se je začel v Srbiji povečevati sredi leta 2008.
The global economic crisis started to affect increasingly Serbia as of mid-2008.
Novembra 2008 so srbske oblasti z MDS sklenile nov aranžma „stand-by“, ki ga je januarja 2009 potrdil upravni odbor MDS.
In November 2008 the Serbian authorities agreed with the IMF a new Stand-By Arrangement (SBA), which was approved by the IMF Board in January 2009.
V začetku leta 2009 so kazalniki napredka potrdili zaostrovanje krize in postalo je jasno, da bo država potrebovala dodatno zunanjo pomoč.
In early 2009, advance indicators confirmed an aggravation of the crisis and it became obvious that the country would need additional external assistance.
Zaradi tega je upravni odbor MDS maja 2009 odobril revizijo aranžmaja.
As a result, in May 2009 the IMF Board approved the revision of the SBA.
Vendar pa je po zadnjih podatkih s sredine julija 2009 gospodarski upad še hujši, kot je bilo predvideno v revidiranih predpostavkah meseca marca, obeti za leto 2009 in naprej pa ostajajo slabi.
However, latest indications as of mid July 2009 suggest that that economic downturn is even more severe than foreseen in the revised March assumptions and the outlook for 2009 and beyond remains difficult.
Predlagana makrofinančna pomoč bo dopolnila podporo MDS, predvideno na podlagi revidiranega aranžmaja „stand-by“, ki ga je maja 2009 odobril upravni odbor MDS, in podporo Svetovne banke v obliki posojil za namene proračunske podpore.
The proposed MFA is intended to complement support from the IMF foreseen under the SBA's revision agreed by the IMF board in May 2009, as well as World Bank support due to take the form of budget support policy loans.
Predlog dopolnjuje proračunsko podporo v okviru instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (skupaj 100 milijonov EUR), ki jo namerava Skupnost zagotoviti v letih 2009 in 2010.
The proposal is complementary to the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA) budget support grants (total of EUR 100 million) that the Community intends to provide in 2009 and 2010.
Makrofinančno pomoč Srbiji je treba obravnavati kot pomembno orodje, s katerim se bo ob podpori programa za gospodarsko stabilizacijo Srbije v trenutni gospodarski krizi dodatno stabiliziralo celotno območje Balkana.
MFA to Serbia should be considered as an important tool to strengthen stabilization in the whole Balkan region by supporting Serbia's economic stabilisation programme at the current economic juncture.
Srbija in njeno gospodarstvo igrata ključno vlogo v procesu regionalnega povezovanja, pomemben pa je tudi njun prispevek k evropskemu povezovanju.
Serbia and its economy play a key role in the regional integration process and its participation in the European integration is essential as well.
Srbija se trenutno sooča s kopico gospodarskih, finančnih, davčnih in podobnih težav, denimo s precejšnjim številom beguncev (približno 700.000 ljudi), premajhno proizvodnjo hrane, visoko stopnjo brezposelnosti ter potrebo po hitrem okrevanju podonavske regije, ki je med vojaškim posredovanjem Nata utrpela resno škodo.
Serbia faces now a lot of economic, financial, fiscal and other relevant problems, for example a heavy burden of refugees (about 700 000 people), food production deficiencies, high rate of unemployment or a need of fast recovery of its Danube river region heavily damaged by NATO military actions.
Makrofinančna pomoč je prav tako potrebna za okrepitev ozemeljske celovitosti Srbije.
MFA is needed to reinforce Serbia´s territorial integrity as well.
Ker je izplačilo prvega obroka predvideno že v začetku leta 2010, je treba odločitev o sprejetju sedanjih predlogov sprejeti pred začetkom veljave Lizbonske pogodbe, saj bo v nasprotnem primeru Komisija morala podati predlog s spremenjeno pravno podlago.
As the first instalment is planned to be disbursed already early 2010, a decision on adopting the current proposal has to be taken either before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon or the Commission would have to present a proposal with modified legal basis.
Potem ko je natančno preučil navedene možnosti in glede na strateško pomembnost, ki jo EU pripisuje Srbiji kot morebitni kandidatki za vstop v EU, poročevalec predlaga, da se sedanji predlogi izjemoma sprejmejo brez sprememb s poenostavljenim postopkom, še preden začne veljati Lizbonska pogodba.
Having carefully considered these options and considering Serbia's strategic importance to the EU as a potential candidate country for EU accession, your rapporteur suggests adopting the current proposal exceptionally without amendments under the 'simplified procedure' before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Tak časovni razpored v zakonodajnem postopku ni sprejemljiv in ga ne gre obravnavati kot izjemo od institucionalnih pooblastil, vendar je, kot kaže, edina sprejemljiva možnost za pravočasni prenos sredstev ES v Srbijo.
Such timetable is not acceptable in a legislative procedure and it should not be seen as an exception to institutional powers, but it seems as the only viable option for ensuring transfer of EC funds to Serbia in due time.
Poročevalec želi v skladu s prejšnjimi resolucijami Parlamenta poudariti tudi, da se tako obsežnega instrumenta, kot je makrofinančna pomoč, ne more preprosto obravnavati kot „izrednega“.
Moreover, the rapporteur would also like to stress, in line with previous Parliament resolutions, that such a substantial instrument as MFA cannot be simply regarded as "exceptional".
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da bosta po začetku veljave Lizbonske pogodbe ustrezna pravna podlaga za sklep o dodelitvi makrofinančne pomoči člena 209(1) in 212(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, in sicer odvisno od tega, ali institucije EU državo upravičenko uvrščajo med države v razvoju ali ne.
In this respect it must be underlined that after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the appropriate legal basis for a Decision granting MFA will be Article 209(1) and 212(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), depending on whether the beneficiary country is classified as developing country or not by the Union institutions.
Četudi bo odbor sprejel predlog za zagotavljanje makrofinančne pomoči in ne bo vložil predlogov sprememb, poročevalec od Sveta in Komisije zahteva, da se v izjavah Parlamentu posvetita zgornjim vprašanjem.
Even if the proposal for MFA is accepted by the Committee without amendments, your rapporteur requests the Council and Commission to address the above concerns in statements to Parliament.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola o pravu, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti, s strani Evropske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Protocol on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2009)0081 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2009)0081 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 61(c) in člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 61(c) and 300(2) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0101/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0101/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0062/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7‑0062/2009 ),
Haaški protokol o pravu, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti, je bil sklenjen 23. novembra 2007.
The Hague Protocol on the Law applicable to Maintenance Obligations was concluded on 23 November 2007 .
Njegov namen je posodobiti haaško konvencijo o pravu, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti do otrok, z dne 24. oktobra 1956 in haaško konvencijo o pravu, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti, z dne 2. oktobra 1973 ter oblikovati splošna pravila o pravu, ki se uporablja, s katerim bi nadomestili haaško konvencijo o mednarodni izterjavi preživnin za otroke in drugih oblik družinskih preživnin z dne 23. novembra 2007
Its aim is to modernise the Hague Convention of 24 October 1956 on the law applicable to maintenance obligations towards children and the Hague Convention of 2 October 1973 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations and to develop general rules on applicable law that may supplement the Hague Convention of 23 November 2007 on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance
Besedila omenjenih konvencij lahko najdete na spletnih straneh Haaške konference o mednarodnem pravu:
For the text of all these Conventions, see the website of the Hague Conference on International Law:
Poleg uradne francoske različice sta na voljo tudi nemški in španski prevod. .
German and Spanish translations are available on the site, in addition to the official French version. .
Glavni cilj uskladitve pravil o pravu, ki se uporablja, je osebam, upravičenim do preživnine („upravičenci”), omogočiti, da ukrepajo ob poznavanju dejanskih razmer, ne da bi zanje veljali različni nacionalni sistemi.
The main aim of the harmonisation of applicable law rules is to enable a person owed maintenance ("the creditor") to act in full knowledge of the situation, without being subject to diverse national systems.
S Protokolom se skuša najti ravnovesje med pravicami preživninskega upravičenca in zavezanca.
The Protocol seeks to strike a balance between the rights of the maintenance creditor and of the debtor.
V protokolu je določeno pravo, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz družinskega razmerja, starševstva, zakonske zveze ali svaštva, vključno s kakršnimi koli preživninskimi obveznostmi do otroka ne glede na zakonski stan staršev (člen 1(1)).
It determines the law applicable to maintenance obligations arising from a family relationship, parentage, marriage or affinity, including any maintenance obligation in respect of a child regardless of the marital status of the parents (Article 1(1)).
Preživninske obveznosti praviloma ureja pravo države, v kateri ima upravičenec običajno prebivališče (člen 3(1)).
As a general rule, maintenance obligations will be governed by the law of the State of habitual residence of the creditor (Article 3(1)).
Posebna pravila pa zagotavljajo zaščito preživninskega upravičenca, če ta ne more dobiti preživnine na podlagi prava države, v kateri ima običajno prebivališče (člen 4).
But special rules provide protection for the maintenance creditor in situations where he or she is unable to obtain maintenance under the law of the State of his or her habitual residence (Article 4).
V primeru preživnine zakonca lahko katera koli stranka zahteva uporabo prava druge države, ki je z zakonsko zvezo tesneje povezano (člen 5).
In the case of spousal maintenance, either of the parties may request application of the law of another State that has a closer connection with the marriage (Article 5).
Posebno pravilo glede obrambe zavezancu v določenih okoliščinah daje možnost, da ugovarja zahtevku za preživnino na podlagi dejstva, da taka obveznost ne obstaja v okviru prava države, v kateri ima zavezanec običajno prebivališče, niti v okviru prava države, katere državljanstvo imata obe stranki, če imata obe stranki isto državljanstvo (člen 6).
A special rule on defence gives the debtor the possibility, in certain circumstances, to contest a claim for maintenance on the ground that there is no such obligation under both the law of the State of habitual residence of the debtor and the law of the State of the common nationality of the parties, if they have one (Article 6).
Poleg navedenega lahko stranki pravo, ki se uporablja za zahtevek za preživnino, sami izbereta za namen določenega postopka (člen 7) ali na splošno (člen 8).
Finally, parties may choose the law applicable to a maintenance claim either for the purpose of a particular proceeding (Article 7) or in general (Article 8).