natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Do 18 mesecev pred iztekom veljavnosti se izvede ocena programa spremljevalnih ukrepov glede banan in napredka zadevnih držav, ki vključuje priporočila glede morebitnih ukrepov, ki naj se sprejme, in vrste teh ukrepov.“;
By 18 months before the expiry date, the banana accompanying measures programme and the progress made by the countries concerned shall be the subject of an assessment, which shall include recommendations on any measures to be taken and the nature thereof.";
(3) člen 21 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(3) Article 21 is replaced by the following:
„ Člen 21 Sprejetje strateških dokumentov in večletnih okvirnih programov
" Article 21 Adoption of strategy papers and multiannual indicative programmes
Strateške dokumente in večletne okvirne programe iz členov 19 in 20 ter njihove morebitne preglede, navedene v členu 19(2) in členu 20(1), kakor tudi spremljevalne ukrepe iz členov 17 in 17a sprejme Komisija z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členom 35 in pod pogoji iz členov 35a in 35b .“
Strategy papers and multi-annual indicative programmes referred to in Articles 19 and 20, and any reviews thereof referred to in Article 19(2) and Article 20(1), as well as accompanying measures referred to in Articles 17 and 17a respectively, shall be adopted by the Commission by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 35, and subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 35a and 35b .";
(4) v členu 22 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(4) Article 22(3) is replaced by the following:
(5) v členu 23 se odstavka 3 in 4 nadomestita z naslednjim:
(5) In Article 23, paragraphs 3 and 4 are replaced by the following:
Če so stroški posebnih ukrepov manjši kot 10 milijonov EUR, Komisija v roku enega meseca po sprejetju sklepa Evropski parlament in Svet obvesti o ukrepih.“
For special measures below EUR 10 million, the Commission shall send the measures to the European Parliament and to the Council for information within one month of adopting its decision.
Spremembe posebnih ukrepov, kot so tehnične prilagoditve, podaljšanje obdobja izvajanja, prerazporeditev sredstev znotraj predvidenega proračuna ali zvišanje oz. znižanje proračuna za manj kot 20 % začetnega proračuna, če takšne spremembe ne vplivajo na začetne cilje, določene v sklepu Komisije, se v roku enega meseca sporočijo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.“;
Amendments to special measures, such as those making technical adjustments, extending the implementation period, reassigning funds within the forecast budget, or increasing or reducing the size of the budget by less than 20 % of the initial budget, provided th o se amendments do not affect the initial objectives set out in the Commission decision , shall be communicated within one month to the European Parliament and to the Council.";
(6) v členu 25 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(6) Article 25(2) is replaced by the following:
Pomoč Unije se načeloma ne uporablja za plačilo davkov, carin ali prispevkov v državah upravičenkah.“;
Union assistance shall not in principle be used for paying taxes, duties or charges in beneficiary countries.";
1. „Proračunske obveznosti se izvajajo na podlagi sklepov, ki jih Komisija sprejme v skladu s členi 17a(3), 22(1), 23(1) in 26(1).“;
Budget commitments shall be made on the basis of decisions taken by the Commission in accordance with Articles 17a(3), 22(1), 23(1) and 26(1).";
(8) v členu 31(1) se tretji pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
(8) In Article 31(1), the third subparagraph is replaced by the following:
„Postopkov dodeljevanja javnih naročil ali pogodb o donacijah, financiranih v okviru tematskega programa, kakor je določen v členih 11 do 16, ter programih iz členov 17 in 17a se lahko poleg fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, ki so že upravičene na podlagi tematskega programa ali programov iz členov 17 in 17a, udeležijo vse fizične osebe, ki so državljani držav v razvoju, kakor so opredeljene s strani OECD/DAC in v Prilogi II, ali pravne osebe s sedežem v teh državah.
"Participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts financed under a thematic programme as defined in Articles 11 to 16, and the programmes set out in Articles 17 and 17a, shall be open to all natural persons who are nationals of, or legal persons who are established in, a developing country, as specified by the OECD/DAC and in Annex II, in addition to natural or legal persons eligible by virtue of the thematic programme or the programmes set out in Articles 17 and 17a.
Komisija objavi in posodablja Prilogo II v skladu z rednimi pregledi seznama prejemnikov pomoči s strani OECD/DAC in o tem obvešča Svet.“;
The Commission shall publish and update Annex II in accordance with regular reviews of the list of aid recipients of the OECD/DAC, and inform the Council thereof.";
(9) v členu 33 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(9) Article 33(2) is replaced by the following:
Poročila o oceni Komisija predloži v informacijo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The Commission shall send its evaluation reports to the European Parliament and to the Council for information.
Rezultati se upoštevajo pri oblikovanju programov in dodeljevanju sredstev.“;
The results shall feed back into programme design and resource allocation.";
(10) člen 35 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(10) Article 35 is replaced by the following:
„Člen 35
“Article 35
Komisiji se za obdobje uporabe te uredbe dodeli pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 17(2) ter členov 17a in 21.
The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Article 17(2) and Articles 17a and 21 shall be conferred on the Commission for the period of application of this Regulation.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov se Komisiji dodeli pod pogoji iz členov 35a in 35b.
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 35a and 35b.
Evropski parlament ali Svet lahko kadar koli prekliče prenos pooblastil iz člena 17(2) ter členov 17a in 21.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 17(2) and Articles 17a and 21 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Institucija, ki je začela notranji postopek za morebitni preklic prenosa pooblastila, si prizadeva o tem obvestiti drugo institucijo in Komisijo v razumnem roku pred sprejetjem končne odločitve, pri čemer navede preneseno pooblastilo, ki naj bi se preklicalo, ter možne razloge za preklic.
The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke a delegation of power shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated power which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation.
Če do izteka navedenega roka iz odstavka 1 niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu, se akt objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati na dan, ki je v njem določen.
If, on the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act, it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the date stated therein.
Če Evropski parlament ali Svet nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu v roku iz odstavka 1, ta ne začne veljati.
If either the European Parliament or the Council objects to the delegated act within the period referred to in paragraph 1, it shall not enter into force.
Institucija, ki nasprotuje, navede razloge za to.“;
The institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.”;
(11) v členu 38 se odstavka 1 in 2 nadomestita z naslednjim:
(11) In Article 38, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:
Referenčni finančni znesek za izvajanje te uredbe v obdobju 2007–2013 je 17.087 milijonov EUR.
The financial reference amount for the implementation of this Regulation over the period 2007‑2013 is EUR 17 087 million.
Okvirni zneski, ki se dodelijo vsakemu programu iz členov 5 do 10, 11 do 16 in 17 do 17a, so določeni v Prilogi IV.
The indicative amounts allocated to each programme referred to in Articles 5 to 10, 11 to 16 and 17 to 17a are laid down in Annex IV.
Ti zneski veljajo za obdobje 2007–2013.“;
These amounts are established for the period 2007-2013.";
(12) vstavi se Priloga IIIa, ki je vsebovana v Prilogi I k tej uredbi;
(12) Annex IIIa, as contained in Annex I to this Regulation, is inserted;
(13) Priloga IV se nadomesti z vsebino Priloge II k tej uredbi.
(13) Annex IV is replaced by the contents of Annex II to this Regulation.
Dominikanska republika
Dominican Republic
Saint Vincent in Grenadine
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Geografski programi:
Geographic programmes:
Tematski programi:
Thematic programmes:
Okolje in trajnostno upravljanje naravnih virov
Environment and sustainable management of natural resources
Migracije in azil
Migration and asylum
Države AKP, ki so pogodbenice Protokola o sladkorju
ACP Sugar Protocol countries
Države AKP, ki so vodilne dobaviteljice banan
Main ACP banana-supplying countries
Vsebinska vprašanja, povezana s spremljevalnimi ukrepi glede banan
Substantial issues concerning the banana accompanying measures
Predlog osnutka uredbe o spremembi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja je namenjen podpori najpomembnejših afriških, karibskih in pacifiških (AKP) držav, izvoznic banan, s spremljevalnimi ukrepi glede banan, predvidenimi za obdobje štirih let (2010–2013).
The aim of the draft regulation amending the DCI is to support the main banana-exporting countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP) via banana accompanying measures (BAMs), which are intended to last for four years (2010-2013).
Parlament je prek Odbora za razvoj že na začetni stopnji izrazil številne pomisleke glede predloga Komisije.
Parliament, through its Committee on Development, raised a series of concerns regarding the Commission proposal at an early stage.
Odbor je zlasti poudaril, da je treba zagotoviti, da bodo spremljevalni ukrepi glede banan usmerjeni v uresničevanje glavnih razvojnih ciljev in ciljev odprave revščine, da bodo spoštovali okoljske, zdravstvene in delovne standarde ter da je treba oblikovati posebna merila za dodeljevanje sredstev.
Our committee highlighted in particular the need for ensuring that the banana accompanying measures are geared to the key objectives of development and poverty eradication, that environmental, health and labour standards are taken into account, and that specific criteria for allocation of funds are formulated.
Poročevalec meni, da je Parlament, kar zadeva vsebinska vprašanja, lahko zadovoljen z vsebino osnutka uredbe, kot ga predlaga Svet.
In the view of your rapporteur, Parliament can be satisfied with the content of the draft regulation as proposed by the Council, as far as substantial issues are concerned.
Poročevalec predlaga zgolj majhno spremembo k uvodni izjavi v različici Sveta 5 (na podlagi predloga spremembe 4 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta), ki izboljšuje tehnično prilagoditev Sveta in jo približuje dogovorjenemu izvirnemu besedilu.
Your rapporteur recommends only one small change to the Council version of recital 5 (based on Parliament's first reading amendment No. 4), in order to improve the technical adaptation made by the Council and bring it closer to the original wording agreed upon.
Sozakonodajalca pa nista dosegla soglasja o horizontalnem vprašanju glede uporabe postopka delegiranih aktov (člen 290 PDEU) v instrumentu za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja, kar bi zadevalo tudi strateške programske dokumente v zvezi s spremljevalnimi ukrepi glede banan.
No agreement among the co-legislators was found, however, on the horizontal issue of the application of the delegated acts procedure (Article 290 TFEU) to the DCI, which would also concern the strategic programming documents relating to the BAM.
Zgolj zaradi tega spornega, a izredno pomembnega vprašanja, ki je podrobneje opisano v nadaljevanju, zakonodajnega postopka o spremljevalnih ukrepih glede banan ni bilo mogoče zaključiti v prvi obravnavi.
It is only for this controversial but very important issue, further outlined below, that a first-reading conclusion of the legislative procedure on the BAM was not possible.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da sta se Parlament in Svet dogovorila o financiranju spremljevalnih ukrepov glede banan za leti 2010 in 2011.
Your rapporteur notes that Parliament and Council have found an agreement on financing the Banana Accompanying Measures (BAM) for 2010 and 2011.
Vendar želi poudariti, da pomisleki o načinu financiranja spremljevalnih ukrepov glede banan, izraženi med prvo obravnavo, še vedno veljajo in da še vedno ni dogovora o financiranju za leti 2012 in 2013.
However, your rapporteur wishes to underline that the concerns about the financing modalities of the BAM expressed during the first reading are still valid, and that no financing agreement has been reached for 2012 and 2013.
Predlog uredbe močno zmanjšuje razliko do zgornje meje v razdelku 4 večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2007–2013 in ne pušča manevrskega prostora za ustrezen odziv ob morebitnih krizah.
The proposal for a regulation drastically reduces the margin under the ceiling of heading 4 of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2007-2013, not leaving sufficient room for manoeuvre to face and to react adequately to potential upcoming crises.
Načeloma se novi instrumenti ne bi smeli financirati s prerazporeditvami, saj to ogroža obstoječe prednostne naloge, nasprotno, financirati bi jih bilo treba z uporabo dodatnih sredstev.
As a matter of principle, any new instrument should not be financed through redeployment as this would jeopardise the existing priorities, but should on the contrary be financed through the mobilisation of additional funds.
Zato je Parlament pozval k reviziji večletnega finančnega okvira na vse načine, ki jih omogočata točki 21 in 23 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, ali z drugimi načini, na primer tistimi iz točk 25 in 27 tega sporazuma.
Therefore, Parliament has called for the revision of the MFF by all means provided for in points 21 and 23 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, or by other means such as those included in points 25 and 27 thereof.
Te pomisleke je treba upoštevati pri odločanju o financiranju spremljevalnih ukrepov glede banan v prihodnjih letih.
These concerns should be taken into account when the financing of the banana accompanying measures for the subsequent years is decided upon.
Odprto vprašanje za drugo obravnavo: postopki demokratičnega nadzora
The remaining issue for second reading: procedures for democratic scrutiny
Ozadje: za kaj pravzaprav gre
Context: what is at stake?
Tehnično številni sklepi, ki jih običajno sprejema Komisija za izvajanje temeljnega akta, izpolnjujejo merila za delegirane akte (člen 290 PDEU).
In technical terms, a number of decisions, which are normally taken by the Commission for the execution of the basic act, fulfil the criteria of "delegated acts" (Article 290 of the TFEU).
Uvedba postopka delegiranih aktov bi obema vejama zakonodajne oblasti omogočila, da učinkovito nasprotujeta nekaterim osnutkom sklepov, ki jih predlaga Komisija, ali celo prekličeta pooblastilo.
The introduction of the delegated act procedure would give the two branches of the legislative authority the possibility to effectively object to certain draft decisions proposed by the Commission, or even to revoke the delegation.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da bi s to odločno spodbudo Komisija ustrezno upoštevala predloge Parlamenta o dodeljevanju finančnih sredstev in sektorskih prednostnih nalogah pri načrtovanju pomoči EU.
Your rapporteur is convinced that this would constitute a strong incentive for the Commission to take duly into account Parliament's suggestions when programming EU aid in terms of funding allocation and sectoral priorities.
Zato se skuša z več postopkovnimi spremembami, predlaganimi v prvi obravnavi, zagotoviti, da se postopek delegiranih aktov ustrezno vključi v uredbo o instrumentu razvojnega sodelovanja v skladu s črko in duhom Lizbonske pogodbe.
That is why several procedural amendments proposed for the first reading aim to ensure that the delegated acts procedure is appropriately included in the DCI regulation, in line with the letter and spirit of the Lisbon Treaty.
Enake spremembe so predlagane tudi v poročilu kolega Gaya Mitchella o vmesnem pregledu instrumenta za razvoj in sodelovanje ( A7–0078/2009 ).
The same amendments have also been proposed in the report by colleague Gay Mitchell on the mid-term review of the DCI (A7- 0078/2009).
Ker velja postopek delegiranih aktov tudi za načrtovanje drugih finančnih instrumentov na področju zunanjega delovanja, ki so v postopku pregleda – instrument stabilnosti, instrument za demokracijo in človekove pravice ter instrument za industrijsko razvite države – sta parlamentarna odbora, pristojna za te instrumente (AFET in INTA), vložila enake predloge sprememb za prvo obravnavo v Parlamentu.
As the delegated acts procedure also applies to the programming of the other financing instruments in the area of external action which are currently under review - the Instrument for Stability, the Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, and the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries -, the parliamentary committees responsible for these instruments (AFET and INTA) tabled identical amendments for the first reading in Parliament.
Stališče parlamentarnih odborov o delegiranih aktih je skladno z analizo pravne službe Parlamenta ter v celoti podpira politično stališče Parlamenta, ki ga je izrazila konferenca predsednikov 9. septembra 2010: „Pogajalci Parlamenta bi morali vedno vztrajati, da se delegirani akti vključijo v vse odločitve, ki izpolnjujejo merila člena 290 PDEU, zlasti glede ciljev, izbire prednostnih nalog, pričakovanih rezultatov in finančnih sredstev v širšem pomenu, da bi se ohranile pristojnosti Parlamenta na tem področju.“
Our committees' position on delegated acts is consistent with the analysis of Parliament's legal service, and is fully in line with Parliament's political position, expressed by the Conference of Presidents on 9 September 2010: " Parliament's negotiators should always insist on the inclusion of delegated acts in all decisions fulfilling the criteria of Article 290 TFEU – in particular concerning objectives, choice of priorities, expected results and financial allocations in broad terms – in order to preserve the Parliament's prerogatives in these areas ".
Medinstitucionalna pogajanja o zunanjih finančnih instrumentih torej za Parlament pomenijo več kot zgolj zagotavljanje učinkovitega parlamentarnega nadzora nad izvajanjem zakonodaje EU in s tem demokratičnega nadzora.
For Parliament, the interinstitutional negotiations on the external financing instruments are therefore not only about ensuring effective parliamentary control, and hence democratic control, over the implementation of EU legislation.
Če izgubimo to bitko, bomo najbrž morali čakati na novo pogodbo, da bi končno dobili pooblastila, ki nam jih Lizbonska pogodba že daje.
If we lose this battle, we may have to wait for a new Treaty in order to finally obtain the powers that the Lisbon Treaty is giving us now.
Ker so bila zaman vsa prizadevanja, da bi na tristranskih pogovorih o teh zadevah in v stikih na tehnični ravni dosegli napredek, je mnenje poročevalca, da mora Parlament v drugi obravnavi čim prej ponoviti in sprejeti svoje mnenje o delegiranih aktih.
As all attempts to move forward on the dossiers during trilogues and technical level contacts have failed, your rapporteur is of the opinion that Parliament should adopt and reiterate as quickly as possible its position regarding the delegated acts in second reading.
Ker sozakonodajalec ne ponuja alternativnih predlogov in ker je treba ukrepati hitro ter v interesu upravičencev, bi moral Parlament ponovno potrditi svoje stališče iz prve obravnave glede ustreznega postopka za demokratični nadzor in uporabe delegiranih aktov, ne da bi se v tej fazi spustil v novo razpravo o posameznih predlogih sprememb.
Given the lack of any alternative proposal from the co-legislator, and the need to act fast in the interest of the beneficiaries, Parliament should reconfirm its position of first reading as regards the appropriate procedure for democratic scrutiny and the application of delegated acts without at this stage entering into a new debate about individual amendments.
Hkrati je treba Svet pozvati, naj se čim hitreje odzove na stališče Parlamenta v drugi obravnavi in zagotovi, da se poišče rešitev in se sredstva čim hitreje sprostijo.
At the same time, Council should be called on to react as quickly as possible to Parliament's second reading position in order to ensure that a solution can be found and that funds can be unblocked as soon as possible.
Za zaključek in glede na navedene pravne in politične argumente poročevalec priporoča ponovno uvedbo vseh predlogov sprememb o delegiranih aktih in demokratičnem nadzoru iz prve obravnave, ki jih Svet ni sprejel.
In conclusion, and in light of the legal and political arguments outlined above, your rapporteur recommends reinstating all the amendments concerning delegated acts and democratic scrutiny from the first reading which were not accepted by the Council.
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Federativno republiko Brazilijo o odpravi vizumske obveznosti za kratkoročno bivanje za imetnike diplomatskih, službenih ali uradnih potnih listov
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports
Poročevalec: Ioan Enciu
Rapporteur: Ioan Enciu
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (16362/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (16362/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Federativno republiko Brazilijo o odpravi vizumske obveznosti za kratkoročno bivanje za imetnike diplomatskih, službenih ali uradnih potnih listov (13708/2010),
– having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13708/2010),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s točko (a) člena 77(2) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0399/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0399/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7‑0010/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0010/2011 ),
Na podlagi Uredbe (ES) 539/2001 sodi Brazilija med države s tako imenovanega pozitivnega seznama, katerih državljani so pri prehodu zunanjih meja Evropske unije oproščeni vizumske obveznosti.
Under Regulation (EC) 539/2001, Brazil is part of the so-called "positive list" of countries whose nationals are exempt from visa requirements when crossing the external borders of the European Union.
Glede na načelo vzajemnosti, na katerem temelji uredba, bi morali vsi državljani EU, ki potujejo v Brazilijo, uživati podobne pravice.
According to the principle of reciprocity that underlies this regulation, all EU citizens should enjoy a similar right when travelling to Brazil.
Doslej se je načelo vzajemnosti v praksi izvajalo z dvostranskimi sporazumi, sklenjenimi med Brazilijo in posameznimi državami članicami.
Until now, the reciprocity principle has been put in practice through bilateral visa waiver agreements concluded between Brazil and individual Member States.