natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Te informacije vsebujejo opise in analizo prejetih prijav, opis postopka ocenjevanja in izbora ter sezname predlaganih projektov za financiranje, pa tudi projektov, za katere je bilo financiranje zavrnjeno.“
This information shall include descriptions and an analysis of the applicati ons received, a description of the assessment and selection procedure, and lists of both the projects proposed for funding and the projects rejected for funding.' .
1(b) Člen 9(3) Sklepa št. 1855/2006/ES se črta.
Article 9(3) of Decision No 1855/2006/EC is deleted.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča o učinku tega sklepa 18 mesecev po začetku veljave.
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the impact of this Decision 18 months after its entry into force.
Postopek odločanja za izvajanje programov
Decision-making process for the implementation of the programmes
Sklepi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za sprejetje večletnih programov na področju kulture, izobraževanja, mladine in dejavnega državljanstva, vsebujejo določbe v zvezi s postopki v okviru sklepa o komitologiji in številne ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje programov.
The decisions taken by the European Parliament and the Council to adopt the multiannual programmes in the field of culture, education, youth and active citizenship contain provisions concerning the procedures under the 'comitology' decision and a number of measures necessary for implementing the programmes.
Ti postopki so določeni v Sklepu Sveta št. 1999/468/ΕS o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta št. 2006/512/ES.
These procedures are set out in Council Decision No 1999/468/ΕC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, as amended by Council Decision No 2006/512/ΕC.
Osnovni instrumenti večletnih programov zagotavljajo delitev odločitev o izbiri med postopki upravljanja in svetovanja ter jasno opredeljujejo število in vrsto odločitev o izbiri, ki jih je treba obravnavati v postopku upravljanja.
The basic instruments of the multiannual programmes provide for the division of selection decisions between the management and the advisory procedures and clearly define the number and type of selection decisions to be subject to the management procedure.
Vsi drugi ukrepi, tudi odločitve o izbiri, morajo biti obravnavani v postopku svetovanja.
All other measures, including the selection decisions, are subject to the advisory procedure.
Komisija meni, da obravnavanje odločitev o izbiri v postopku svetovanja pomeni daljša obdobja, potrebna za njihovo sprejetje, in vpliva na njihovo učinkovitost.
The Commission considers that making selection decisions subject to the advisory procedure entails extending the periods of time required to adopt them and has an impact on their effectiveness.
Komisija opozarja tudi na naravo ukrepov programov, ki zadevajo dokaj veliko število upravičencev, katerih dejavnosti so v veliki meri odvisne od podpore Skupnosti, potrebna sredstva pa so omejena.
The Commission also notes the nature of the programmes' actions which concern a relatively large number of beneficiaries whose activities are significantly dependent on Community support, while the relevant amounts are limited.
Komisija predlaga, da se ukine postopek svetovanja za odločitve o izbiri, da bi poenostavili postopke odločanja v interesu potencialnih upravičencev dotacij.
The Commission proposes eliminating the advisory procedure for selection decisions in order to simplify decision-making procedures in the interests of potential beneficiaries of the grants.
Komisija opaža tudi, da se programski odbor pogosteje poslužuje pisnega postopka in mora v petih dneh podati mnenje o odločitvah o izbiri, ki mu je bila predložena, da bi skrajšal čas, potreben za posvetovanje o odločitvah o izbiri, ki se obravnavajo v postopku svetovanja.
The Commission also notes that, in order to reduce the time required for consultation on selection decisions which are subject to the advisory procedure, the programme committee makes more use of the written procedure and has five days in which to deliver an opinion on the selection decisions submitted to it.
Vaša poročevalka meni, da ne sme biti dvomov glede vrednosti komitologije, ki Evropskemu parlamentu daje pravico do pregleda in pravico do obveščenosti, s čimer mu omogoča, da spremlja izvajanje zakonodajnih instrumentov, sprejetih v postopku soodločanja, in nasprotuje vsem ukrepom, ki jih predvidi Komisija, za katere meni, da bi presegli izvedbena pooblastila, predvidena v osnovnem instrumentu.
Your rapporteur believes that there can be no questioning the value of comitology, which gives the European Parliament the right of scrutiny, and the right to information, allowing it to monitor the implementation of legislative instruments adopted under the codecision procedure and also to contest any measures envisaged by the Commission which it thinks would exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument.
Poročevalka želi poudariti, da se je Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje večkrat zavzel za hiter, učinkovit in pregleden postopek, ki bo kljub temu varoval pravico do pregleda in obveščenosti v zvezi z odločanjem.
Your rapporteur would stress that the Committee on Culture and Education has repeatedly advocated a swift, effective and transparent procedure which will, nevertheless, safeguard the right of scrutiny and information in regard to decision-making.
Za hitro in učinkovito izvajanje postopkov izbora v interesu upravičencev ter da se zagotovi najboljši način za izpolnjevanje ciljev programov, ne da bi pri tem zmanjšali preglednost postopka odločanja, bi lahko postopek svetovanja nadomestili, če Komisija nemudoma obvesti Evropski parlament in države članice o odločitvah o izbiri, ki bodo sprejete brez odločanja v programskem odboru.
In order to carry out the selection procedures quickly and effectively in the interests of beneficiaries and to ensure the best way of fulfilling the objectives of the programmes, without reducing the transparency of the decision-making procedure, the advisory procedure could be replaced provided that the Commission informs the European Parliament and the Member States without delay of the selection decisions which will be taken without being submitted to the programme committee.
Menimo tudi, da mora Komisija nemudoma obvestiti programski odbor in Evropski parlament o vseh postopkih izbora, prošnjah za financiranje, ki jih je pregledala, in ocenah teh prošenj ter zagotoviti popoln seznam vseh projektov, izbranih za financiranje, in tistih, ki so bili zavrnjeni.
It is also considered that the Commission should inform the programme committee and the European Parliament without delay on all the selection procedure, the applications for funding which it has examined, the assessment of those applications, and that it should also provide a full list of the projects selected for funding and those rejected.
Glede na to, da gre za nov postopek, je bistveno, da je sozakonodajalcema – Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu – omogočeno, da ocenita rezultate novih ukrepov v doglednem času po začetku veljave novega instrumenta.
Given that this is a new procedure, it is essential that the co-legislators, the Council and the European Parliament, are able to assess the results of the new measures within a reasonable period of time after the entry into force of the new instrument.
Zato menimo, da je treba od Komisije zahtevati, da odslej poroča Parlamentu in Svetu.
It is, therefore, considered that the Commission should be required to report thereon to Parliament and the Council.
Sporazum Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta o vzpostavitvi postopka soodločanja
Agreement of the Council and European Parliament on the completion of the codecision procedure
Vaša poročevalka pozdravlja konstruktivno in odprto medinstitucionalno sodelovanje pri predlogih Komisije, dejstvo, da se bodo programi izvajali pregledno in učinkovito ter da bosta zakonodajalca – Svet in Parlament – obveščena takoj in sistematično.
Your rapporteur welcomes the constructive and open-minded interinstitutional cooperation on the Commission's proposals, the fact that the programmes will be implemented transparently and effectively and that the legislator - the Council and Parliament - will be informed immediately and systematically.
Osnutek poročila odraža izid razprav s Svetom in Komisijo v postopku soodločanja.
The draft report reflects the outcome of deliberations with the Council and the Commission during the codecision procedure.
Program Kultura (2007-2013)
Culture Programme (2007-2013)
o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Sklepa št. 1719/2006/ES o uvedbi programa Mladi v akciji za obdobje 2007–2013
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1719/2006/EC establishing the Youth in Action programme for the period 2007 to 2013
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0056 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0056 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 149(4) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0057/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 149(4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0057/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0274/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0274/2008 ),
Predlog Sklepa – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a decision – amending act
Zato je treba Sklep št. 1719/2006/ES spremeniti in s tem omogočiti hitrejše in bolj učinkovito sprejemanje odločitev o izbiri –
It is therefore necessary to amend Decision No 1719/2006/EC in order to allow selection decisions to be implemented more quickly and efficiently.
Sklep 1719/2006/ES
Decision 1719/2006/EC
Členu 10 Sklepa št. 1719/2006/ES se doda odstavek 1(a):
The following paragraph 1a shall be incorporated into Article 10 of Decision No 1719/2006/EC:
Kadar Komisija na podlagi tega sklepa sprejema odločitve o dodelitvi subvencij, ki niso navedene v odstavku 1, te odločitve sprejema brez sodelovanja odbora .“
Where the Commission adopts decisions, in accordance with the present Decision, on the award of grants other than those listed in paragraph 1, it shall adopt these decisions without the assistance of a committee . "
Člen 10(2) Sklepa št. 1719/2006/ES se glasi:
Article 10(2) of Decision No 1719/2006/EC shall read as follows :
Komisija obvesti odbor iz člena 9 in Evropski parlament o vseh drugih odločitvah o izbiri v zvezi z izvajanjem tega sklepa, ki jih sprejme v dveh delovnih dneh po sprejetju teh odločitev.
The Commission shall inform the Committee referred to in Article 9 and the European Parliament, o f all other selection decisions taken by the Commission for the implementation of this Decision, within two working days of the adoption of the decisions in question .
Te informacije vsebujejo opise in analizo prejetih prijav, opis postopka ocenjevanja in izbora ter sezname predlaganih projektov za financiranje, pa tudi projektov, za katere je bilo financiranje zavrnjeno.“
This information shall include descriptions and an analysis of the applications received, a description of the assessment and selection procedure, and lists of both the projects proposed for funding and the projects rejected for funding.'
1(b) Člen 9(3) Sklepa št. 1719/2006/ES se črta.
Article 9(3) of Decision No 1719/2006/EC is deleted.
Komisija predlaga, da se ukine postopek svetovanja za odločitve o izbiri, da bi poenostavili postopke odločanja v interesu potencialnih upravičencev do dotacij.
The Commission proposes eliminating the advisory procedure for selection decisions in order to simplify decision-making procedures in the interests of potential beneficiaries of the grants.
Komisija opaža tudi, da programski odbor pogosteje uporablja pisni postopek in mora v petih dneh podati mnenje o odločitvah o izbiri, ki mu je bila predložena, da bi skrajšal čas, potreben za posvetovanje o odločitvah o izbiri, ki se obravnavajo v postopku svetovanja.
The Commission also notes that, in order to reduce the time required for consultation on selection decisions which are subject to the advisory procedure, the programme committee makes more use of the written procedure and has five days in which to deliver an opinion on the selection decisions submitted to it.
Zato menimo, da je treba od Komisije zahtevati, da o tem poroča Parlamentu in Svetu.
It is, therefore, considered that the Commission should be required to report thereon to Parliament and the Council.
Program Mladi v akciji za obdobje 2007-2013
Youth in Action programme (2007-2013)
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Sklepa št. 1904/2006/ES o uvedbi programa Evropa za državljane za spodbujanje aktivnega evropskega državljanstva za obdobje 2007–2013
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1904/2006/EC establishing for the period 2007 to 2013 the programme ‘Europe for Citizens’ to promote active European citizenship
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0059 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0059 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 151 in 308 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija predlog predložila Parlamentu ( C6-0060/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 151 and 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0060/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0275/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0275/2008 ),
Zato je treba Sklep št. 1904/2006/ES spremeniti in s tem omogočiti hitrejše in bolj učinkovito sprejemanje odločitev o izbiri −
It is therefore necessary to amend Decision No 1904/2006/EC in order to allow selection decisions to be implemented more quickly and efficiently.
Da bi se omogočilo hitrejše in učinkovitejše sprejemanje odločitev o izbiri je treba svetovalni postopek nadomestiti z obveznostjo Komisije, da nemudoma obvesti Evropski parlament in države članice o vseh ukrepih, sprejetih za izvajanje tega sklepa brez sodelovanja odbora.
In order to allow selection decisions to be implemented more quickly and efficiently, it is therefore necessary to replace the advisory procedure with an obligation on the Commission to inform the European Parliament and the Member States without delay about any measures taken for the implementation of this Decision without the assistance of a committee.
Sklep 1904/2006/ES
Decision 1904/2006/EC
Členu 9 Sklepa št. 1904/2006/ES se doda odstavek 2(a):
The following paragraph 2a shall be incorporated into Article 9 of Decision No 1904/2006/EC:
Kadar Komisija na podlagi tega sklepa sprejema odločitve o dodelitvi subvencij, ki niso navedene v odstavku 2, te odločitve sprejema brez sodelovanja odbora.“
Where the Commission adopts decisions, in accordance with the present Decision, on the award of grants other than those listed in paragraph 2, it shall adopt these decisions without the assistance of a committee.”
Člen 1 a – točka 1 a (novo)
Article 1 a – point 1 a (new)
Člen 8(3) Sklepa št. 1904/2006/ES se glasi:
Article 8(3) of Decision No 1904/2006/EC shall read as follows :
Komisija obvesti odbor iz člena 9 in Evropski parlament o vseh drugih odločitvah o izbiri v zvezi z izvajanjem tega sklepa, ki jih sprejme v dveh delovnih dneh po sprejetju teh odločitev.
The Commission shall inform the Committee referred to in Article 9 and the European Parliament, o f all other selection decisions taken by the Commission for the implementation of this Decision, w ithin two working days of the adoption of the decisions in question.
1(b) Člen 9(3) Sklepa št. 1904/2006/ES se črta.
Article 9 (3) of Decision No 1904/2006/EC is deleted.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča o učinku tega sklepa 18 mesecev po začetku njegove veljavnosti.
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the impact of this Decision 18 months after its entry into force.
Sklepi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za sprejetje večletnih programov na področju kulture, izobraževanja, mladine in dejavnega državljanstva vsebujejo določbe v zvezi s postopki v okviru sklepa o komitologiji in številne ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje programov.
The decisions taken by the European Parliament and the Council to adopt the multiannual programmes in the field of culture, education, youth and active citizenship contain provisions concerning the procedures under the 'comitology' decision and a number of measures necessary for implementing the programmes.
Za hitro in učinkovito izvajanje postopkov izbora v interesu upravičencev ter za zagotovitev najboljšega načina za izpolnjevanje ciljev programov, ne da bi pri tem zmanjšali preglednost postopka odločanja, bi lahko postopek svetovanja nadomestili, če bi Komisija nemudoma obvestila Evropski parlament in države članice o odločitvah o izbiri, ki bodo sprejete brez odločanja v programskem odboru.
In order to carry out the selection procedures quickly and effectively in the interests of beneficiaries and to ensure the best way of fulfilling the objectives of the programmes, without reducing the transparency of the decision-making procedure, the advisory procedure could be replaced provided that the Commission informs the European Parliament and the Member States without delay of the selection decisions which will be taken without being submitted to the programme committee.
Program Evropa za državljane (2007-2013)
‘Europe for Citizens’ programme (2007-2013)
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Sklepa št. 1720/2006/ES o uvedbi akcijskega programa na področju vseživljenjskega učenja
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1720/2006/EC establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0061 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0061 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251 ter členov 149(4) in 150(4) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija predlog predložila Parlamentu ( C6-0064/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 149(4) and 150(4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0064/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0276/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0276/2008 ),
Zato je treba Sklep št. 1720/2006/ES spremeniti in s tem omogočiti hitrejše in bolj učinkovito sprejemanje odločitev o izbiri −
It is therefore necessary to amend Decision No 1720/2006/EC in order to allow selection decisions to be implemented more quickly and efficiently.
Sklep št. 1720/2006/ES
Decision 1720/2006/EC
Člen 9 – odstavek 1 a
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a
Členu 9 Sklepa št. 1720/2006/ES se doda odstavek 1(a):
The following paragraph 1a shall be incorporated into Article 9 of Decision No 1720/2006/EC:
Kadar Komisija na podlagi tega sklepa sprejema odločitve o dodelitvi subvencij, ki niso navedene v odstavku 1, te odločitve sprejema brez sodelovanja odbora.“
Where the Commission adopts decisions, in accordance with the present Decision, on the award of grants other than those listed in paragraph 1, it shall adopt these decisions without the assistance of a committee ."
Člen 9(2) Sklepa št. 1720/2006/ES se glasi:
Article 9(2) of Decision No 1720/2006/EC shall read as follows :
Komisija obvesti odbor iz člena 10 in Evropski parlament o vseh drugih odločitvah o izbiri v zvezi z izvajanjem tega sklepa, ki jih sprejme v dveh delovnih dneh po sprejetju teh odločitev.
The Commission shall inform the Comm ittee referred to in Article 10 and the European Parliament, o f all other selection decisions taken by the Commission for the implementation of this Decision, within two working days of the adoption of the decisions in question.
Te informacije vsebujejo opise in analizo prejetih prijav, pa tudi opis postopka ocenjevanja in izbora ter sezname predlaganih projektov za financiranje in projektov, za katere je bilo financiranje zavrnjeno.“
This information shall include descriptions and an analysis of both the applications received, a description of the assessment and selection procedure, and lists of the projects proposed for funding and the projects rejected for funding.'
1(b) Člen 10(3) Sklepa št. 1720/2006/ES se črta.
Article 10 (3) of Decision No 1720/2006/EC is deleted.
Akcijski program na področju vseživljenjskega izobraževanja in usposabljanja
Action programme in the field of lifelong learning
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Witoldu Tomczaku
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Witold Tomczak
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za nepriznanje imunitete Witoldu Tomczaku v zvezi s kazenskim postopkom, ki ga vodi okrožno tožilstvo v Varšavi (Warszawa Śródmieście Północ) na Poljskem, ki jo je 14. decembra 2007 vložil namestnik državnega tožilca v Varšavi, posredoval poljski vrhovni tožilec 31. januarja 2008 in ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 10 marca 2008,
– having regard to the request by the Deputy Public Prosecutor of Warsaw for waiver of the immunity of Witold Tomczak in connection with the criminal proceedings conducted by the District Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw (Warszawa Śródmieście Północ), Poland, which was made on 14 December 2007, forwarded by the Polish Prosecutor General on 31 January 2008 and announced in plenary sitting on 10 March 2008,
– po zaslišanju Witolda Tomczaka (28. maja 2008) v skladu s členom 7(3) svojega poslovnika,
– having heard Witold Tomczak on 28 May 2008 in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju člena 105 poljske ustave,
– having regard to Article 105 of the Polish Constitution,
– ob upoštevanju členov 6(2) in 7 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0277/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0277/2008 ),
A. ker je bil Witold Tomczak 21. septembra 1997 in 23. septembra 2001 izvoljen v spodnji dom poljskega parlamenta (sejm); ker je po podpisu pristopne pogodbe 16. aprila 2003 postal opazovalec; ker je bil poslanec v Evropskem parlamentu od 1. maja 2004 do 19. julija 2004; ker je bil 13. junija 2004 izvoljen v Evropski parlament in je njegov mandat v poljskem parlamentu potekel 16. junija 2004,
A. whereas Witold Tomczak was elected to the Sejm (the lower house of the Polish Parliament) on 21 September 1997 and on 23 September 2001; whereas after the signature of the Accession Treaty on 16 April 2003 he became an Observer; whereas he was a Member of the European Parliament from 1 May 2004 until 19 July 2004; whereas he was elected to the European Parliament on 13 June 2004 and his term of office in the Polish Parliament expired on 16 June 2004,
B. ker je Witold Tomczak obtožen povzročitve škode, ocenjene na 39 669 PLN (približno 11 500 EUR) na kipu z imenom Deveta ura, ki upodablja papeža Janeza Pavla II, ki ga zadene meteorit, v galeriji Zaheta v Varšavi 21 decembra 2000, s čimer je prekršil člen 288(1) poljskega kazenskega zakonika
B. whereas Witold Tomczak is charged with causing damage valued at up to 39 669 PLN (approximately 11 500 EUR) to a sculpture titled “The Ninth Hour” – depicting Pope John Paul II crushed by a stone – in the Zachęta Gallery in Warsaw on 21 December 2000 in breach of Article 288(1) of the Polish Penal Code
C. ker je okrožno tožilstvo v Varšavi zbralo dokaze zoper Witolda Tomczaka, vendar je ta zavrnil odgovarjanje na vprašanja v zvezi z dogodkom v galeriji Zaheta,
C. whereas the District Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw has collected evidence against Witold Tomczak, but the latter has refused to answer questions regarding the event at the Zachęta Gallery,