natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prisotni so bili naslednji poslanci: Alin Lucian Antochi (predsedujoči), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (podpredsedujoča), Francesco Enrico Speroni (podpredsedujoči), Monica Frassoni (poročevalka), Sharon Bowles, Brian Crowley, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Alain Lipietz, Manuel Medina Ortega, Georgios Papastamkos, Aloyzas Sakalas. in brez vzdržanih glasov, vašemu odboru kot pristojnemu odboru priporoča, naj predlog prouči ob upoštevanju njegovih predlogov.
The following Members were present: Alin Lucian Antochi (acting Chair), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (Vice-Chair), Francesco Enrico Speroni (Vice-Chair), Monica Frassoni (rapporteur), Sharon Bowles, Brian Crowley, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Alain Lipietz, Manuel Medina Ortega, Georgios Papastamkos, Aloyzas Sakalas, Jaroslav Zvěřina. and no abstentions, recommends that your committee, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in keeping with its suggestions.
o zeleni knjigi o teritorialni koheziji in napredku razprav o prihodnji reformi kohezijske politike
on Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion and the state for the debate on the future reform of Cohesion policy
– ob upoštevanju Petega poročila Komisije z dne 19. junija 2008 o napredku gospodarske in socialne kohezije – Rastoče regije, rastoča Evropa ( KOM(2008)0371 ) (peto poročilo o napredku),
– having regard to the Commission's fifth progress report of 19 June 2008 on economic and social cohesion - Growing regions, growing Europe ( COM(2008)0371 ) (Fifth Progress Report),
– ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije z dne 6. oktobra 2008 o teritorialni koheziji – Teritorialna raznolikost kot prednost ( KOM(2008)0616 ) (zelena knjiga),
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper of 6 October 2008 on Territorial Cohesion-Turning territorial diversity into strength ( COM(2008)0616 ) (Green Paper),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta osebja Komisije z dne 14. novembra 2008 z naslovom Regije 2020 – ocena prihodnjih izzivov za regije EU ( SEC(2008)2868 ) (poročilo Komisije o regijah 2020),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document of 14 November 2008 on Regions 2020 - an assessment of Future Challenges for EU Regions ( SEC(2008)2868 ) (Commission Report on Regions 2020),
- ob upoštevanju členov 158 in 159 ter člena 299(2) Pogodbe o ES,
- having regard to Articles 158 and 159 and Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju Četrtega poročila Komisije z dne 30. maja 2007 o gospodarski in socialni koheziji ( KOM(2007)0273 ),
- having regard to the Commission's fourth Report of 30 May 2007 on Economic and Social Cohesion ( COM(2007)0273 )
– ob upoštevanju Teritorialne agende Evropske unije in Leipziške listine o trajnostnih evropskih mestih ter izvajanja akcijskega programa za teritorialno agendo,
– having regard to the Territorial Agenda of the EU and the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities, and the implementation of the Action Programme of the Territorial Agenda,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 21. februarja 2008 o četrtem poročilu o gospodarski in socialni koheziji
– having regard to its resolutions of 21 February 2008 on the fourth report on economic and social cohesion
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0068 . (resolucija o četrtem poročilu o napredku), 21. februarja 2008 o spremljanju teritorialne agende in leipziške listine: evropskemu akcijskemu programu za prostorski razvoj in ozemeljsko kohezijo naproti
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0068 . (resolution on the Fourth Progress Report), of 21 February 2008 on the follow-up of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter: Towards a European Action Programme for Spatial Development and Territorial Cohesion
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0069 . ter 21. oktobra 2008 o upravljanju in partnerstvu
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0069 . , and of 21 October 2008 on governance and partnership
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0492 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0492 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Evropskega omrežja za opazovanje prostorskega razvoja (ESPON) z naslovom Prihodnost ozemlja – teritorialni scenariji za Evropo ter poročila Evropskega parlamenta z naslovom Regionalna neskladja in kohezija: strategije za prihodnost?,
– having regard to the report by the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) entitled 'Territorial Futures - Spatial scenarios for Europe and that of the European Parliament Regional Disparities and Cohesion: what Strategies for the Future?',
– ob upoštevanju sklepov konference o teritorialni koheziji in prihodnosti kohezijske politike v Parizu 30. in 31. oktobra 2008,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Conference on territorial cohesion and the future of cohesion policy held in Paris on 30 to 31 October 2008,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 28. septembra 2005 o vlogi teritorialne kohezije v regionalnem razvoju
– having regard to its resolution of 28 September 2005 on the role of territorial cohesion in regional development
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 svojega poslovnika in poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0083/2009 ),
– having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0083/2009 ),
A. ker vse države članice EU še niso ratificirale lizbonske pogodbe, v kateri je teritorialna kohezija navedena med temeljnimi cilji Evropske unije, poleg ekonomske in socialne kohezije,
A. whereas the Lisbon Treaty, which enshrines territorial cohesion as among the fundamental objectives of the European Union alongside economic and social cohesion, has not yet been ratified by all EU Member States,
B. ker je koncept teritorialne kohezije impliciten v kohezijski politiki od njenega začetka in je bistven za njen razvoj; ker je postal ta koncept v lizbonski pogodbi in zeleni knjigi vidnejši in izrazitejši,
B. whereas the concept of territorial cohesion has been implicit in cohesion policy since its inception and at the core of its development; whereas the Lisbon Treaty and the Green Paper have made the concept more visible and explicit,
C. ker ostaja kohezijska politika EU temeljni steber procesa evropske integracije in ena od najuspešnejših politik EU, ki pospešuje konvergenco med vse bolj raznolikimi regijami ter spodbuja rast in zaposlovanje; ker je kohezijska politika EU najbolj viden, otipljiv in merljiv izraz evropske solidarnosti in enakosti, na enakih načelih pa temelji tudi teritorialna kohezija kot del te politike,
C. whereas the EU cohesion policy remains an essential pillar in the process of European integration and one of the most successful EU policies, by facilitating convergence between increasingly diverse regions and stimulating growth and employment; whereas the EU cohesion policy is the most visible, tangible and quantifiable expression of European solidarity and equity, and whereas territorial cohesion, as an integral part of the EU cohesion policy, is based on the same principles,
D. ker najnovejša poročila o koheziji kljub precejšnjemu uspehu pri doseganju konvergence v Evropski uniji kažejo na trend večanja neenakosti med regijami EU, na primer v smislu dostopnosti, zlasti za regije EU v strukturno neugodnem položaju, pa tudi v neenakosti v posameznih regijah in na ozemljih EU, zaradi česar bi lahko nastal pojav prostorske segregacije in bi se lahko povečale razlike med regijami EU v ravni blaginje,
D. whereas, despite significant progress made in terms of convergence in the European Union, the most recent cohesion reports highlight a trend towards worsening territorial disparities between EU regions, for instance in terms of accessibility, in particular for the structurally disadvantaged EU regions, but also at an intra-regional level and within EU territories, which could lead to phenomena of spatial segregation and widen the differences in the levels of prosperity of the EU regions,
E. ker se je kohezijska politika EU že izkazala za uspešno, saj je omogočila pomembno medsebojno dopolnjevanje z drugimi politikami Skupnosti, da bi se povečal njihov vpliv na terenu in v korist državljanov Unije, medtem ko je na primer medsebojno dopolnjevanje med kohezijsko politiko ter raziskavami in inovacijami ali lizbonsko strategijo, kot tudi medsebojno dopolnjevanje na čezmejni ravni, že prineslo otipljive pozitivne rezultate, ki jih je treba utrjevati in širiti,
E. whereas the EU cohesion policy has already been successful in creating some important synergies with other Community policies with the aim of increasing their impact on the ground and for the benefit of citizens of the Union and whereas, for example, synergies between cohesion policy and research and innovation or the Lisbon Strategy, and synergies at cross-border level, have delivered tangible positive results that must be confirmed and expanded,
Potek razprave o prihodnosti kohezijske politike EU
State of the debate about the future of the EU cohesion policy
2. z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da so ti sklepi v veliki meri skladni s stališčem, ki ga je sam izrazil v resoluciji o četrtem poročilu o gospodarski in socialni koheziji; poudarja, da je bila ta resolucija njegov prvi prispevek k tej javni razpravi;
Welcomes the fact that those conclusions correspond to a very large extent to the view expressed in its resolution on the Fourth Progress Report on economic and social cohesion; recalls that that resolution represented the first contribution of the Parliament to the public debate;
4. meni, da je teritorialna kohezija osrednji steber za doseganje ciljev kohezijske politike EU, saj krepi tako ekonomsko kot socialno kohezijo; poudarja, da teritorialna kohezija učinkovito prispeva k odpravi razvojnih neenakosti med državami članicami ter v samih državah članicah in med regijami; zato meni, da mora prihodnja reforma regionalne politike EU vključevati sklepe razprave o omenjeni zeleni knjigi;
Believes that territorial cohesion is a central pillar for achieving the objectives pursued by the EU cohesion policy, by reinforcing both economic and social cohesion; stresses that territorial cohesion contributes effectively to closing the development gaps between but also within Member States and regions; considers, therefore, that the future reform of EU regional policy should incorporate the conclusions of the debate on the Green Paper;
Ocena zelene knjige o teritorialni koheziji
Assessment of the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion
8. meni, da zelena knjiga ne upošteva zadosti zavez iz teritorialne agende in leipziške listine, zlasti kar zadeva načelo policentrizma ali novo partnerstvo med mesti in podeželjem, ki dajejo teritorialni koheziji strateško in operativno vizijo; zato meni, da morajo biti ti cilji v ospredju razprave o teritorialni koheziji;
Considers that the Green Paper does not take due account of the commitments made in the Territorial Agenda and Leipzig Charter, which give territorial cohesion a strategic and operative vision, in particular as regards the polycentrism principle or the new urban-rural partnership; considers that those objectives need to be central to the debate on territorial cohesion;
10. meni, da je uskladitev vseh sektorskih politik Skupnosti z velikim teritorialnim vplivom temeljnega pomena za razvoj teritorialne kohezije ter okrepitev ekonomske in socialne kohezije; zato obžaluje, da so v omenjeni analizi v zeleni knjigi te politike EU zgolj navedene, niso pa predlagani načini za izboljšanje njihovega medsebojnega dopolnjevanja ali celo metode, na podlagi katerih bi bilo resnično mogoče meriti teritorialni vpliv teh politik;
Considers the coordination of all sectoral Community policies that have a strong territorial impact to be central to the development of territorial cohesion and the reinforcement of economic and social cohesion; regrets, therefore, that the relevant analysis in the Green Paper is confined to listing those EU policies without suggesting ways of improving synergies between them or even methods by which, in fact, to measure the territorial impact of those policies;
12. meni, da je trdna in ustrezno financirana regionalna politika Evropske unije pogoj za soočanje s prihodnjimi širitvami ter za ustvarjanje socialne, ekonomske in teritorialne kohezije v razširjeni EU;
Considers that the existence of a strong and well-financed EU regional policy is a condition for tackling successive enlargements and for achieving social, economic and territorial cohesion in an enlarged European Union;
Analiza koncepta teritorialne kohezije
Analysis of the concept of Territorial Cohesion
17. poudarja, da koncept teritorialne kohezije zajema tudi kohezijo na posameznih ozemljih, ter predlaga, naj se prednost nameni vsem politikam, ki spodbujajo resnično policentričen razvoj območij, da bi se tako zmanjšal pritisk na glavna mesta in spodbudil nastanek novih zgostitvenih območij; ugotavlja, da je treba na ta način tudi kljubovati negativnemu vplivu koncentracije na mesta (tj. prometni zastoji, onesnaževanje, socialna izključenost, revščina) ali posledične nenadzorovane urbanizacije na kakovost življenja njihovih prebivalcev; meni, da se pri tem ne sme spregledati podpore podeželju in pomembne vloge, ki jo tu imajo mala in srednje velika mesta;
Emphasises that the concept of territorial cohesion also embraces cohesion within territories and proposes that priority be given to any policies that promote a genuinely polycentric development of territories, in order to lessen the pressures on capital cities and encourage the emergence of secondary poles; notes that this should also be a way to counter the negative effects of concentration for cities (e.g. congestion, pollution, social exclusion, poverty) or subsequent uncontrolled urbanisation that affect the quality of life of their citizens; considers that support for rural areas and the important role played by small and medium-sized towns located in rural areas should not be overlooked in that regard;
21. meni, da se teritorialne kohezije ne bi smelo omejiti zgolj na vplive regionalne politike Evropske unije na njenem ozemlju, pač pa bi se morala osredotočiti tudi na teritorialno razsežnost drugih sektorskih politik Skupnosti z močnim teritorialnim vplivom; v smislu teritorialne kohezije poudarja, da je treba izboljšati medsebojno dopolnjevanje različnih politik Skupnosti, da bi bil njihov teritorialni vpliv na terenu usklajen in čim večji; obenem tudi poudarja, da bodo politike Skupnosti vedno ostale avtonomne in da ta proces ne pomeni prevlade ene politike nad drugo;
Believes that territorial cohesion should not be limited to the effects of EU regional policy on the territory of the European Union, but should also focus on the territorial dimension of other sectoral Community policies with a strong territorial impact; stresses, in the context of territorial cohesion, the importance of improving synergies between the different Community policies in order to coordinate and maximise their territorial impact on the ground; notes, however, that all Community policies will always keep their autonomy, and that this process does not imply the subordination of one policy to another;
Priporočila za prihodnost teritorialne kohezije
Recommendations for the future of territorial cohesion
25. pozdravlja objavo poročila Komisije „Regije 2020“ ter poziva Komisijo, naj v belo knjigo o teritorialni koheziji vključi ugotovitve in rezultate analiz iz tega poročila, zlasti v zvezi z opisom ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije;
Welcomes the publication of the Commission Report on Regions 2020; calls on the Commission to incorporate the findings and analyses of that working document into its White Paper on Territorial Cohesion, in particular in connection with the description of economic, social and territorial cohesion;
29. poudarja pomembnost vključevanja vidika spola, enakih možnosti in posebnih potreb invalidnih oseb ter starejših državljanov na vseh stopnjah izvajanja in ocenjevanja kohezijske politike;
Recalls the importance of mainstreaming the gender perspective, equal opportunities and the special needs of persons with disabilities and senior citizens at every stage in the implementation and assessment of cohesion policy;
33. meni, da je za boljše usklajevanje teritorialnega vpliva sektorskih politik Skupnosti potrebno boljše razumevanje in meritev tega vpliva, zato poziva Komisijo, naj oceni teritorialni vpliv teh politik, obstoječe mehanizme za oceno teritorialnega vpliva, kot je strateška okoljska presoja, pa razširi na teritorialne vidike; nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi konkretne ukrepe za zagotovitev medsebojnega dopolnjevanja med temi teritorialnimi in sektorskimi politikami ter izvede oceno o prispevku lizbonske in göteborške strategije k teritorialni koheziji;
Believes that in order better to coordinate the territorial impact of sectoral Community policies, there needs to be a better understanding and measurement of those impacts; urges the Commission, therefore, to proceed with a territorial impact assessment of those policies, and to extend the existing impact assessment mechanisms, such as the Strategic Environmental Assessment, to territorial aspects; calls on the Commission also to present concrete ways of creating synergies between those territorial and sectoral policies and to proceed with an assessment of the contribution of Lisbon and Gothenburg strategies on territorial cohesion;
35. obenem poudarja, da opredelitev dodatnih kazalnikov in izvedba teritorialnih ocen ne sme povzročiti več birokracije ali zamud pri izvajanju novih politik in ukrepov, ki podpirajo teritorialno kohezijo; poudarja, da so zaradi vključitve teritorialne kohezije v naslednji sklop programov iz strukturnih skladov potrebni neposredni rezultati;
Stresses, however, that the elaboration of additional indicators and the conduct of territorial assessments should not lead to more bureaucracy or further delays in the implementation of new policies and actions in support of territorial cohesion; stresses the need for direct results resulting from the incorporation of territorial cohesion in the next set of Structural Funds programmes;
41. meni, da bo imel celovit pristop več možnosti za uspeh, če bodo regionalni in lokalni organi ter druge zainteresirane strani, vključno z ekonomskimi, socialnimi in drugimi partnerji v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu
Considers that taking an integrated approach will have a greater chance of success if the regional and local authorities, as well as stakeholders, including economic, social and other partners in accordance with Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
UL L 210, 30.7.2006. , ki imajo splošen pregled ter razumejo potrebe in posebnosti posameznih območij, že od začetka sodelovali pri oblikovanju in izvajanju razvojnih strategij za posamezna območja; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi smernice, ki bodo državam članicam ter regionalnim in lokalnim organom v pomoč, da bodo celovit pristop izvajale čim učinkoviteje in vzpostavile učinkovita partnerstva pri razvoju strategij za zadevna ozemlja v prihodnje;
OJ L 210, 30.7.2006. , who can provide an overall view and understanding of the needs and specificities of a given territory, are involved from the beginning in the designing and implementation of the development strategies of each territory; calls on the Commission to draw up guidelines to help Member States, as well as regional and local authorities to implement the integrated approach in the most efficient way and to establish effective partnerships in the development of future strategies for the territories concerned;
44. poudarja, da so težave pri izvajanju strukturne politike delno nastale zaradi preveč togih in zapletenih postopkov in bi zato bilo treba razmisliti o njihovi poenostavitvi ter jasni razdelitvi odgovornosti in pristojnosti med Evropsko unijo, državami članicami ter regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi; meni, da bo teritorialno upravljanje močno odvisno od vzpostavitve takšnih jasnih pravil, ter ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s tem nemudoma pripravi sveženj konkretnih predlogov;
Recalls that problems in implementing structural policy are due in part to the excessive rigidity and complexity of procedures and that, consequently, consideration should be given to simplifying those procedures and clearly dividing responsibilities and competences between the EU, the Member States and regional and local authorities; considers that territorial governance will depend strongly on the establishment of such clear rules; reiterates its call to the Commission to come forward without delay with a set of concrete proposals to that effect;
46. tudi poziva države članice, naj začnejo proučevati možnosti, kako bi lahko bolje utrdile in izvajale pojem teritorialne kohezije v svojih nacionalnih programih in politikah; v zvezi s tem meni, da bi morale v prostorsko načrtovanje že vključiti osnovni načeli policentričnega razvoja in partnerstva med mesti in podeželjem ter dosledno izvajanje omrežja Natura 2000;
Urges the Member States to start reflecting now on how better to consolidate and implement the notion of territorial cohesion in their national programmes and policies; considers, in this context, that the basic principles of polycentric development and urban-rural partnership, as well as the full implementation of Natura 2000 should already be integrated in their regional planning;
V samoiniciativnem poročilu je obravnavana zelena knjiga o teritorialni koheziji, vsebuje pa tudi nekaj splošnih premislekov o poteku razprave o prihodnji kohezijski politiki EU, kakor je bila predstavljena v petem poročilu o napredku na področju ekonomske in socialne kohezije.
This initiative report responds to the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion and also includes some general considerations about the state of the debate on the future EU cohesion policy, as presented in the Fifth Progress Report on Economic and Social Cohesion.
V njem je predstavljena analiza zelene knjige ter nekaj začetnih idej kot odziv na ta pomembni dokument politike.
It provides an analysis of the Green Paper and brings forward some initial ideas in response to this important policy paper.
Po mnenju odbora za regionalni razvoj je pomembno, da Evropski parlament sprejme jasno stališče o razumevanju in vlogi teritorialne kohezije, pa tudi o prihodnosti regionalne politike Evropske unije.
The Committee on Regional Development believes it is important that the European Parliament adopts a clear view not only on the understanding and role of territorial cohesion, but also on the future of EU regional policy.
Evropski parlament je v samoiniciativnem poročilu o vlogi teritorialne kohezije v regionalnem razvoju (poročevalec Ambroise Guellec), sprejetem na plenarnem zasedanju 28. septembra 2005, pozval Evropsko komisijo, naj čim prej objavi belo knjigo o teritorialni koheziji.
In its own-initiative report on "The role of territorial cohesion in regional development" (rapporteur: Ambroise Guellec), adopted in plenary on 28 September 2005, the European Parliament urged the European Commission to proceed promptly with the publication of a "White Paper on Territorial Cohesion".
S tem je jasno nakazal, da je koncept teritorialne kohezije bistven za nadaljnji razvoj regionalne politike EU, zato ga je bilo treba ustrezno opredeliti.
At that time, this was a clear indication on the side of the European Parliament, that the concept of "territorial cohesion" would be instrumental to the future development of EU regional policy.
Splošna razprava o teritorialni koheziji poteka že od devetdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja.
However, since the 90s, a general debate on territorial cohesion has already been in progress.
Leta 1999 se je z Evropsko perspektivo prostorskega razvoja začel proces, katerega rezultat je bila teritorialna agenda Evropske unije, ki so jo leta 2007 sprejeli ministri EU, pristojni za prostorsko načrtovanje in urbani razvoj.
In 1999, the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) initiated a process leading up to the 2007 adoption of the "Territorial Agenda of the European Union" by the EU Ministers responsible for spatial planning and urban development.