natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar pa bi ob strogem izvajanju prepoved zavržkov predstavljala resne težave, ki jih Komisija morda podcenjuje:
However, strict enforcement of a discard ban would present serious difficulties that the Commission may be under-estimating:
· za preverjanje izvajanja bi bilo treba občutno povečati nadzor;
· a significant increase in surveillance would be necessary to verify implementation;
· tako Komisija kot države članice bi potrebovale dodatno osebje in druge vire prav v času splošnega zmanjševanja proračunskih sredstev;
· additional personnel and other resources would be needed in both the Commission and Member States in a time of overall budget cuts;
· pojavil bi se velikanski tok rib/odpadkov proti obali, istočasno s potrebo, da se ta tok odstrani;
· an enormous stream of fish/waste coming to shore would be created, along with the need to dispose of it;
· ribičem bi bilo treba v zadostni meri nadomestiti stroške zaradi prevoza teh rib na obalo, ne da bi jih pri tem spodbujali (na primer z razvojem novega trga).
· fishermen would need to be sufficiently compensated for cost of bringing that fish to shore without actually encouraging them (for example by developing a new market).
Malo pozornosti se posveča uporabi pozitivnih spodbud, ki bi nagrajevale ribiče, ki bolje lovijo in torej ne lovijo nezaželenega, namesto da se jim nalagajo podrobna tehnična pravila o ribolovnem orodju in praksah.
Little attention is paid to the use of positive incentives, rewarding fishermen who fish "better" by not catching things that are not wanted, rather than by imposing detailed technical rules on fishing gear and practices.
Ribiči imajo možnosti, da z uporabo selektivnejšega orodja ali praks pridobijo nekatere prednosti ali privilegije in se istočasno sami odločajo, katero metodo bodo uporabljali.
Different options exist to provide some sort of advantage or privilege to fishermen who use more selective gear or practices, while leaving up to them exactly what methods they use.
Te možnosti so:
Possibilities include:
· plovilom, ki uporabljajo selektivnejše orodje, dovoliti več dni na morju ali drugače podaljšati dovoljen ribolovni čas;
· allowing more days at sea or otherwise increasing allowable fishing time for vessels using more selective gear;
· zagotoviti prednostni dostop na območja, zaprta za plovila, ki ne uporabljajo selektivnega orodja;
· providing preferential access to areas that are closed to vessels not using selective gear;
· plovilom s selektivnejšim orodjem dovoliti, da lovijo ribe v času, ko jih drugi ne smejo.
· allowing vessels with more selective gear to fish during times when others not allowed.
Zgodnji primer uporabe pozitivnih spodbud se je zgodil v devetdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja pri ribolovu tunov z zapornimi plavaricami v vzhodnem Pacifiku.
An early example of the use of positive incentives occurred in the Eastern Pacific purse seine fishery for tuna in the 1990s.
Zaradi pritiska, naj se ulov delfinov zmanjša, so bila plovila za ribolov tunov z zaporno plavarico primorana svoje mreže postaviti na plavajoče objekte, kar je povzročilo velik prilov številnih drugih vrst, razen delfinov.
Pressure to reduce catches of dolphins was forcing seiners to set their nets on floating objects, resulting in large by-catches of many species other than dolphins.
Ribiči so ugotovili, da je v njihovem interesu zmanjšati ulov delfinov, zato je bil uveden sistem dodeljevanja kvot za delfine na plovilo – po doseženi kvoti plovila niso smela več loviti z nastavljanjem mrež okoli delfinov in so morala preiti na druge metode.
The fishermen realized it was in their interest to reduce dolphin catches, so a scheme was established to allocate vessel-specific quotas for dolphins - after the quota was reached, vessels could no longer fish by setting their nets around dolphins and must switch to other methods.
Rezultat je bil izreden – ribiči so razvili lastne metode, s katerimi so se izognili pobijanju delfinov, smrtnost delfinov pa je iz več deset tisoč padla na manj kot tisoč letno.
The results were spectacular - fishermen developed their own methods to avoid killing dolphins and dolphin mortality fell from several tens of thousands to less than 1,000 per year.
To načelo je v zakonodaji EU že bilo uporabljeno.
This principle has been applied in EU legislation already.
Lovu na škampa z vlečno mrežo, opremljenimi z izločevalnimi rešetkami, ki izpolnjuje zahteve o sestavi ulova (vsaj 70 % škampa, manj kot 5 % trske), so dodelili dodatne dneve na morju.
In the Nephrops fishery, trawls equipped with a sorting grid are given extra days at sea if they meet catch composition requirements (at least 70% Nephrops , <5% cod).
Take oblike prednostnega dostopa za ribiče, ki izpolnjujejo nekatera merila, bi lahko kot v primeru škampa uveljavili na vsem območju EU ali v državi članici glede na njeno dodeljevanje kvot.
Such forms of preferential access for fishermen meeting certain criteria could be done on an EU-wide basis, as the Nephrops example, or by a Member State with respect to its allocation of a quota.
Nič od tega ne bi oviralo koncepta relativne stabilnosti.
Neither of these would interfere with the concept of relative stability.
S tem pristopom se izčrpno uporablja strokovno znanje, ki ga ribiška industrija nedvomno ima, za reševanje ene od največjih težav v industriji, zavržkov in odpadkov velike količine rib in drugih vrst.
This approach makes full use of the undoubted expertise of the fishing industry in order to resolve one of the industry's own largest problems - the discarding and waste of significant quantities of fish and other species.
Dr Andy Revill, CEFAS ( Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science , Center za okoljske, ribiške in vodne znanosti), Lowestoft Laboratory, Parkfield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT UK kaže, kako lahko s selektivnimi orodji drastično zmanjšamo prilov.
Dr Andy Revill, CEFAS (Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science), Lowestoft Laboratory, Parkfield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT UK shows how dramatically by-catch can be reduced using selective gear.
Ribiška industrija je v nekaterih segmentih že izkazala voljo in zmožnost, da razvije inovativne tehnike za preprečevanje zavržkov.
Certain segments of the fishing industry have already demonstrated their willingness and ability to develop innovative techniques to avoid discards.
· Francoski udeleženci v lovu na škampa z vlečno mrežo v Biskajskem zalivu od leta 2002 preizkušajo spremembe orodja, s katerimi naj bi se zmanjšal ulov majhnih škampov in nekaterih rib, na primer majhnega osliča.
· Participants in the French trawl fishery for Nephrops in the Bay of Biscay have experimented since 2002 with gear modifications to reduce the capture of small Nephrops and certain fish such as small hake.
S kombinacijo izločevalne rešetke in kvadratastih mrežnih očes v vreči ali pred njo so dosegli zelo velika zmanjšanja, vendar težave pri škampih ostajajo in delo se nadaljuje.
A combination of a sorting grid and square meshes in or ahead of the codend produces very significant reductions but problems remain for Nephrops and the work continues.
Uporaba kvadratastih mrežnih očes je postala v ribištvu obvezna, najprej jo je sprejela industrija (2004), potem EU (2006).
The use of square mesh was made compulsory in the fishery, first by the industry itself (2004), then by the EU (2006).
· 1. septembra 2007 je škotska industrija ob sodelovanju škotske vlade uvedla prostovoljni sistem zaprtij v realnem času v območjih ICES IV in VI.
· Beginning on 1 September 2007, the Scottish industry, in cooperation with the Scottish Executive, initiated a voluntary system of real-time closures in ICES areas IV and VI.
Če opazovalci na krovu odkrijejo ulov majhnih trsk (natančneje 60 trsk na uro ribolova), potem odvzamejo nadaljnje vzorce in, če so potrjeni, se za 21 dni ustvari zaprto območje 15 kvadratnih milj.
If on-board observers detect catches of small cod (specifically, 60 cod per hour of fishing) then further samples are taken and, if confirmed, a closed area of 15 miles square is created for a period of 21 days.
· Švedski predpisi od 1. februarja 2004 dalje zahtevajo, da se pri vlečnih mrežah za lov na škampa uporablja izločevalna rešetka, ki se je pri zmanjševanju zavržkov nedoraslih škampov in tržnih rib izkazala za precej učinkovito.
· Since 1 February 2004, Swedish regulations require the use of a sorting grid in Nephrops trawls, which have been quite effective in reducing discards of juvenile Nephrops and commercial fish.
Ti predpisi veljajo zgolj za švedska plovila v obalni coni treh milj v Kattegatu in coni štirih milj v Skagerraku, ne pa za norveška ali danska plovila, ki imajo ugodnosti iz dvostranskih sporazumov za ribolov v švedski obalni coni, saj skupna ribiška politika zaradi izključne pristojnosti EU na področju ribištva državam članicam pušča le malo možnosti za inovativne ukrepe na področju ohranjanja staležev rib.
These regulations only apply to Swedish vessels operating in the 3 mile coastal zone in the Kattegat and 4 mile zone in the Skagerrak, not to Norwegian or Danish vessels that benefit from bilateral agreements to fish in the Swedish coastal zone, since the CFP allows Member States very little room for innovative actions in conserving fish stocks, given the "exclusive competence" of the EU in fisheries.
Ob zadovoljivi spodbudi lahko ribiška industrija razvije metode za zmanjšanje zavržkov, ne da bi jo na mikro ravni upravljali natančni tehnični ukrepi.
The fishing industry is able to develop methods to reduce discards, without being micro-managed by detailed technical measures, provided that there is sufficient incentive.
Tako je bil eden od razlogov, da so se v francoskem lovu na škampa začele preiskave, zaskrbljenost, da se velikost mrežnih očes utegne spremeniti s 70 mm na 100 mm.
For instance, one of the reasons that the French Nephrops fishery began its investigations was concern over a possible change in mesh size from 70mm to 100mm.
Ker se tako razlogi za zavržke kot ukrepi za njihovo zmanjšanje med vrstami ribolova razlikujejo, ni enotne rešitve, ki bo učinkovita v vsej Skupnosti.
Since both the causes of discards and the measures needed to reduce them vary from fishery to fishery, no single solution will work throughout the Community.
Najbrž je najboljši pristop kombinacija pozitivnih spodbud za ribiče, da bodo razvili ustrezne metode, okrepljena z možnostjo vse strožjih negativnih spodbud, če v kratkem ne bo zadostnih rezultatov.
Possibly the best approach is a combination of positive incentives to encourage fishermen to develop the appropriate methods, reinforced with the possibility of increasingly severe negative incentives if sufficient results are not forth-coming.
Lahko bi na primer izbrali eno ali več poskusnih vrst ribolova, pri čemer bi prednost imele tiste z najvišjim deležem zavržkov ali vrst, ki so posebej ogrožene (morski psi, morske ptice itd.).
For instance, one or more pilot fisheries could be chosen, with priority for those with the highest discard rate or species that are particularly vulnerable (sharks, seabirds, etc).
Kot primer naj delež zavržkov presega polovico ulova: 30 % nedoraslih rib in 25 % neželenih vrst.
For the sake of illustration, suppose the discard rate is over half of what is caught - 30% juvenile fish and 25% unwanted species.
Ribičem bi lahko določili obdobje dveh let, v katerem bi preizkušali tehnike za zmanjšanje zavržkov s ciljem za polovico zmanjšati obe vrsti zavržkov (nedorasle ribe in druge vrste).
Fishermen could be given a period of two years to experiment with techniques to reduce discards, with the target being to reduce each type (juveniles and other species) by half.
Po preteku tega obdobja bi preverjene tehnike dodali v zakonodajno podlago EU, podobno kot v primeru francoskega lova na škampa.
At the end of that period, proven techniques would be added to the EU legislative base, as was done for the French Nephrops fishery.
Ob nezadostnih rezultatih bi uvedli znatno povečanje velikosti mrežnih očes.
If results are insufficient, then a significant increase in mesh size would be imposed.
Če se po še nadaljnjih dveh letih stanje ne bi izboljšalo, bi za tovrstni ribolov uvedli prepoved zavržkov.
After another two years, if the situation had not improved, a discard ban would be imposed for that fishery.
Medtem ko bi obravnavali poskusne vrste ribolova, bi bilo treba oceniti obseg zavržkov v drugih vrstah ribolova.
While these pilot fisheries are being dealt with, the extent of discards in other fisheries should be evaluated.
Potrebna sta sodelovanje ter forum za razpravo in izmenjavo idej med vsemi zadevnimi stranmi, še najbolj z ribiško industrijo, vendar tudi z različnimi državnimi akterji, tržnimi in nevladnimi organizacijami ter ostalimi zainteresiranimi stranmi.
Cooperation and a forum for discussion and exchange of ideas by all concerned is necessary - most importantly the fishing industry, but also various state players, market associations, NGOs and other stakeholders.
To bi lahko potekalo na ravni organizacij proizvajalcev, nacionalnih združenj ribičev ali regionalnih svetovalnih svetov ali pa na ravni organizacije, ustanovljene v ta namen.
This could occur at the level of producer organization, national fishermen's association or RAC, or some level of organization created for the purpose.
Navedli smo nekaj predlogov za pozitivne spodbude, vendar nedvomno obstajajo še drugi.
Suggestions for positive incentives have been mentioned above, but doubtless others exist.
Prav tako popolna prepoved zavržkov ni edina možna negativna spodbuda.
A total discard ban is not the only possible negative incentive either.
Še eno možnost morda predstavlja delitev celotnega dovoljenega ulova na ciljne kvote in kvote prilova.
Another idea could be for a TAC to be divided into a target quota and a by-catch quota.
Takšen sistem so vzpostavili na Islandiji, kot kaže uspešno.
A system such as this has been set up in Iceland, apparently with some success.
Lahko bi se izvajal bodisi znotraj celotnega dovoljenega ulova EU bodisi v državah članicah, ko svojim plovilom dodeljujejo dostop.
This could be done either within the EU TAC as a whole, or else by a Member State when allocating access for its vessels.
Ker je sedanji sistem celotnega dovoljenega ulova rezultat občutljivega političnega kompromisa hkrati pa eden glavnih vzrokov za zavržke, je treba vse spremembe tega sistema natančno premisliti, da se ne bi stanje zavržkov še poslabšalo.
Given that the current TAC system is the result of delicate political compromise, as well as being one of the leading causes of discards, any changes to the TAC system must be very carefully thought through in order to avoid making the discard situation even worse.
Nekateri predlogi za prepoved zavržkov imajo vpliv na razpravo o upravljanju ribištva na podlagi pravic, kot so prenos kvot.
Some of these proposals concerning a discard ban have implications for the debate on rights-based management, such as transfer of quota.
Za vse to bo potreben denar.
All of this will require money.
Dodelitev sredstev iz Evropskega ribiškega sklada v ta namen je v pristojnosti države članice.
Allocation of EFF money to this end is a Member State prerogative.
Sklad bi bilo mogoče spremeniti in omogočiti bolj prilagodljivo rabo sredstev, da bi z novimi tehnikami za izmenjavo podatkov poenostavili nekatere nove ukrepe, na primer zaprtja v realnem času ali druge pobude.
The Fund could be amended to allow more flexible use of it, for new techniques of information exchange to facilitate some of the new measures such as real-time closures or other initiatives.
Treba bi bilo raziskati možnosti za financiranje iz industrije, na primer z dajatvami glede na velikost ulova ali z določenim majhnim odstotkom celotnega dovoljenega ulova za financiranje raziskav in programov opazovanja za spremljanje.
Industry sources of funding should be explored, such as a levy based upon the size of catches or dedicating a fixed, small percentage of the TAC to be used to fund research and observer programmes for monitoring.
Če bi uvedli prepoved zavržkov, bi lahko kot vir sredstev uporabili prihodek iz njihove prodaje.
Alternatively, if a discard ban is imposed, proceeds from their sale could be used as a source of funds.
Za nekatere od omenjenih idej bo med različnimi akterji potrebno boljše zaupanje in sodelovanje od tistega, ki smo ga nekajkrat zasledili.
Some of the ideas mentioned above will require rather more trust and cooperation among the various players than is sometimes evident.
Tako bi za sistem zaprtij v realnem času morali ustanoviti institucionalni okvir, ki bi omogočal zelo hitro odločanje na osnovi dogovorjenih meril, odločitve pa bi morali upoštevati vsi.
For instance, a system for closures in real time would require the establishment of an institutional framework able to take a decision very quickly, based upon previously agreed criteria, and have it respected by all.
Sedaj države članice nimajo pravne podlage za uvedbo tehničnih ukrepov proti drugim plovilom, ki ribarijo v njihovih obalnih vodah.
At present, a Member State does not have the legal right to impose technical measures on other vessels fishing in its coastal waters.
Morda bi jo morale dobiti.
Perhaps it should.
Morda bi lahko predvideli mehanizem, s katerim bi države članice v okviru skupne ribiške politike delovale skupaj in se dogovorile za posebne ukrepe, ne da bi jih moral sprejeti Svet.
Alternatively, a mechanism for Member States to act jointly within the context of the CFP could be envisaged, whereby they could agree to a specific measure without the necessity to have it accepted by the Council as a whole.
Flota EU lovi v vseh oceanih, tudi v vrstah ribolova, pri katerih je delež zavržkov velik, na primer lov kozic z vlečnimi mrežami ali ribolov tunov s potegalko na plavajočih objektih.
The EU fleet fishes in all major oceans of the world, including in some fisheries known to produce high levels of discards, such as shrimp trawling or tuna seining when fishing on floating objects.
Ukrepi za zmanjšanje zavržkov v vodah EU bi morali veljati za vsa plovila pod zastavo EU, ne glede na to, kje lovijo.
Measures taken to reduce discards in EU waters should be applied to EU-flagged vessels wherever they operate.
Sporočilo Komisije torej pozdravljamo, čeprav obsojamo dejstvo, da Komisija, države članice in industrija od sporočila izpred petih let niso dosegle skoraj nikakršnega napredka.
In conclusion, the Commission's communication is to be heartily welcomed, even while condemning the almost total lack of progress by the Commission, the Member States and the industry since the previous communication five years ago.
Komisija namerava hitro ukrepati, nekatere vidike želi leta 2008 vključiti v novo uredbo o tehničnih ukrepih.
The Commission intends to act quickly, with certain aspects to be included in a new technical measures regulation in 2008.
Nadejamo se političnega ozračja, v katerem se bodo države članice in industrija pozitivno odzvale in z domišljijo ter predanostjo zmanjšale zavržke.
Hopefully the political climate is such that the Member States and the industry will react positively and use their imagination and commitment to reduce discards.
To je že dolgo potrebno.
That is a long overdue necessity.
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za ribištvo kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
6. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva razpoložljivo znanstveno mnenje o staležih trske v Baltskem morju, kjer je velik odstotek ulova registriran kot prilov;
Calls on the Commission to take into account the available scientific opinion on the Baltic cod stocks, where a huge percentage of catches are registered as by-catches;
8. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva razpoložljivo znanstveno mnenje o albatrosih, ki jim zaradi trenutne stopnje pogina, zlasti pri ribolovu s parangalom, grozi izumrtje;
Calls on the Commission to take into account the available scientific opinion on albatrosses which, notably in long line fisheries, are currently being killed at a rate that is putting them in danger of extinction;
11. priporoča, da se prilovne kvote vključijo v sistem celotnega dovoljenega ulova ter da ves iztovorjeni prilov šteje pri dodeljevanju kvot; če ribolov preseže prilovno kvoto, tvega prepoved, kot naj bi tudi presežek nedoraslih osebkov povzročil zaprtje v realnem času; ta kvota se mora nato postopno zmanjševati, da se zagotovijo dodatne spodbude za izboljšanje selektivnosti opreme;
Recommends that by-catch quotas be incorporated into Total Allowable Catches (TACs) and that all landed by-catch be counted against quota allocations; should a fishery exceed its by-catch quota it would risk closure, just as an excess of juveniles is suggested to trigger real-time closures; this quota should then be gradually reduced to provide further incentives to improve gear selectivity;
18. poziva Komisijo, v skladu z resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 10. julija 2007 o industrijskem ribolovu z vidika proizvodnje ribje moke in ribjega olja ( 2004/2262(INI) )
Calls on the Commission, in accordance with Parliament's resolution of 10 July 2007 on industrial fisheries and the production of fishmeal and fish oil ( 2004/2262(INI) )
Sprejeta besedila, TA(2007)0327. , naj opravi študije in/ali izvede pilotni projekt o možnostih za uporabo zavržkov v sektorju industrijskega ribolova, ki ne bo v nobenem primeru privedla do prekomernega izkoriščanja virov;
Texts Adopted, TA(2007)0327. , to carry out studies and/or pilot projects to investigate the possibilities for the industrial fishing sector to use discards without this under any circumstances leading to an over-exploitation of resources.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 98/70/ES glede specifikacij motornega bencina, dizelskega goriva in plinskega olja ter o uvedbi mehanizma za spremljanje in zmanjševanje emisij toplogrednih plinov zaradi uporabe goriv za cestni promet ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 1999/32/ES glede specifikacij goriva, ki ga uporabljajo plovila za plovbo po celinskih plovnih poteh, in o razveljavitvi Direktive 93/12/EGS
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/70/EC as regards the specification of petrol, diesel and gas-oil and introducing a mechanism to monitor and the introduction of a mechanism to monitor and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the use of road transport fuels and amending Council Directive 1999/32/EC, as regards the specification of fuel used by inland waterway vessels and repealing Directive 93/12/EEC
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................38
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ....................39
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................51
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ........53
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0018 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0018 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 95 in 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0061/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 95 and 175(1)of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0061/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6‑0496/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0496/2007 ),