natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na področju raziskav v ribištvu je še posebej zaskrbljujoče pomanjkanje mladih znanstvenikov, kar strokovnjaki pripisujejo premalo privlačnim poklicnim možnostim.
A particular concern in applied fisheries research is the scarcity of young scientists, a circumstance that experts attribute to the lack of attractiveness of such careers.
Zgodilo se je že, da so morali v nekaterih državah članicah zapreti specializirane ustanove za raziskave v ribištvu zaradi pomanjkanja študentov.
The point has now been reached where institutes specialising in fisheries research in some Member States have been forced to close owing to the lack of students.
Za odpravo takšnega stanja bi bilo treba uvesti zanimiv in ustrezno ovrednoten univerzitetni študij, ki bo zagotavljal donosno zaposlitev.
Remedying this situation would entail establishing interesting and status-enhancing university courses leading on to well-paid careers.
Potrebujemo politiko izobraževanja, ki bo spodbujala mlade znanstvenike, da se bodo usmerili k raziskavam na področju ribolovnih virov.
We need an education policy that will motivate young scientists to take up research in the field of fishery resources.
Za to bo treba izboljšati izobraževanje in usposabljanje, mobilnost in poklicno preusmeritev ter delovne pogoje, zlasti, kar zadeva raziskovalne dejavnosti v ribištvu, pa tudi v drugih sorodnih sektorjih.
In order to do so, it will be necessary to improve education and training, mobility and professional reorientation as well as working conditions, especially with regard to research activities focusing on fisheries but also in other related sectors.
Prav tako bo treba izboljšati prepoznavnost in pobude za znanstvenike, s čimer se bo na splošno izboljšala pomorska znanost in še posebej raziskave v ribištvu.
It will also be necessary to enhance the profile and incentives for scientists, which will produce an improvement in marine science in general and fisheries research in particular.
Potreba po ustreznem financiranju
Need for adequate funding
Čeprav ni vprašanje denar, temveč človeški viri, to še ne pomeni, da je raziskavam na tem področju namenjeno veliko finančnih sredstev.
Even though the phrase ‘ Not money, but human resources is the problem! ’ sums up the situation very well, this does not mean that there is a surplus of financial resources for research in this area.
Za uresničitev ciljev je poleg ustrezne uporabe znanstvenega in tehnološkega znanja potrebna odločna finančna podpora ES in držav članic.
In addition to the adequate use of scientific and technological knowledge, the challenges require decisive financial support from the EC and the Member States.
Do zdaj so se različne raziskovalne ustanove financirale iz skladov na dva načina: iz nacionalnih skladov v zameno za posredovanje znanstvenih podatkov vladam držav članic ter iz skladov Skupnosti po direktivi o zbiranju osnovnih podatkov in prek njihovega sodelovanja v znanstvenih odborih.
Up to now, the various research institutes have been funded through two channels: national funds in exchange for providing Member State governments with scientific information, and Community funds under the directive on basic data collection and through their participation in the scientific committees.
Tretji vir financiranja je bil okvirni program za raziskave.
The third source of funding was the research framework programme.
V četrtem in petem okvirnem programu sta bila vključena posebna programa za ribištvo in ribogojstvo (FAIR) za področje aplikativnih morskih raziskav in s sredstvi v višini od 130 do 150 milijonov EUR.
The 4th and 5th FPs included specific programmes for fisheries and aquaculture (FAIR) intended for the applied marine research sector, with funding of EUR 130 and 150 million.
V šestem okvirnem programu je bilo ribištvo še vedno prednostna naloga, vendar so se sredstva zmanjšala na 60 milijonov EUR.
Fisheries policy was still a priority in the 6th FP, even though the amount of funding was reduced to EUR 60 million.
Za razliko pa sedmi okvirni program ribištva ali ribogojstva ne obravnava kot posebnih področij.
In contrast, the 7th FP does not treat either fisheries or aquaculture as a specific strand.
Samo tema 2 o prehrani, kmetijstvu in biotehnologiji bi lahko v širšem pomenu besede zajemala tudi raziskave na teh področjih.
Only thematic area 2, ‘Food, agriculture and biotechnology’ could, if interpreted in the wider sense, cover research in these fields.
Tudi v temi 6 o okolju (vključno s podnebnimi spremembami) raziskave o morskih virih in celostno upravljanje obalnih območij niso izrecno omenjene.
Thematic area 6, ‘Environment (including climate change)’ does not specifically include research on marine resources and integrated coastal zone management either.
Znanstveniki imajo težave pri predstavitvi projektov iz sedmega okvirnega programa zaradi različnega pristopa v raziskavah, ki je na področju ribogojstva predvsem industrijski, na področju ribištva in morske znanosti pa večdisciplinaren in dolgoročnejši.
Scientists face difficulties when submitting projects to the 7th FP owing to the differing approach taken in research on topics linked to aquaculture, for example, which are basically industrial in nature, and on topics relating to fisheries or marine sciences, which are multidisciplinary and more long-term in nature.
Doslej sta se obe področji financirali iz istih skladov, kar je omogočalo njuno dopolnjevanje, usklajeval pa ju je GD za ribištvo in ne GD za raziskave.
Until now, both fields were covered by the same funds, thus allowing complementarity, and they were coordinated by DG Fisheries rather than DG Research.
Zato ima znanstvena skupnost sedaj več težav pri posredovanju vprašanj in potreb sektorja uradnikom, pristojnim za pripravo povabil za oddajo ponudb.
The outcome is that it has become more difficult for the scientific community to communicate the concerns and needs of the sector to the officials responsible for drawing up calls for proposals.
GD za raziskave se je poleg tega odločil, da bo financiral predvsem temeljne raziskave, namesto da bi podprl raziskave, usmerjene k javnim politikam, s katerimi bi na primer znanstveno podkrepili morsko strategijo Skupnosti ali preučili prispevek ribištva k podnebnim spremembam.
For its part, DG Research has opted chiefly to finance basic research rather than accommodating research geared to public policies in order, for example, to boost the scientific component of the Community marine strategy, or study fishing’s contribution to climate change.
Če povzamemo, je za uresničitev cilja pomorske politike Evropske unije, ki je produktivno ribištvo v čistem morskem okolju, treba zagotoviti, da bodo vsi znanstveniki, ki delujejo na tem področju, imeli dostop do horizontalnih mehanizmov financiranja iz sedmega okvirnega programa.
To sum up, the objective of EU maritime policy, achieving productive fishing in a clean marine environment, requires scientists working in this area to have access to horizontal financing mechanisms under the 7th FP.
Vztrajamo, da je treba začeti izvajati posebno znanstveno politiko, ki se bo ukvarjala z ribolovnimi viri in bo imela na voljo znatna finančna sredstva.
We insist on the need urgently to implement a specific science policy geared to fishery resources, accompanied by a significant financial effort.
Evropska unija bo s podpiranjem izobraževanja in usposabljanja na področju pomorstva omogočila povezovanje različnih družbenih, gospodarskih, morskih in trgovinskih vidikov ter prispevala k boljšemu splošnemu pogledu na skupno ribiško politiko in potrebo po njeni ohranitvi.
EU support for marine training and education will make it possible to integrate the various points of view, social, economic, maritime and commercial, and will help to improve the way in which the common fisheries policy is generally viewed and heighten awareness of the need to maintain it.
o poročilu Komisije o izvajanju Direktive 2001/29/ES o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi
on the outlook for copyright in the EU
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................17
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 18
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................20
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................21
– ob upoštevanju členov 14 in 95 pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 14 and 95 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 27 Splošne deklaracije Združenih narodov o človekovih pravicah,
– having regard to Article 27 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
– ob upoštevanju členov 17(2) listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 30. novembra 2007 o izvajanju direktive 2001/29/ES o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi ( SEC(2007)1556 ),
– having regard to the Commission report of 30 November 2007 on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society ( SEC(2007)1556 ),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 16. julija 2008 o avtorskih pravicah v gospodarstvu znanja ( KOM(2008)0466 ),
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper of 16 July 2008 on copyright in the knowledge economy ( COM(2008)0466 ),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2001/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2001 o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi
– having regard to Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society
UL L 167, 22.6.2001 , str.
OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju direktive 2004/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine
– having regard to Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights
UL L 157, 30.4.2004 , str.
OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p.
45. in izjave Komisije 2005/295/ES o členu 2 direktive 2004/48/ES (2005/295) ES
45. and to Commission Statement 2005/295/EC concerning Article 2 of Directive 2004/48/EC
UL L 94, 13.4.2005 , str.
OJ L 94, 13.4.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. septembra 2008 o kolektivnem čezmejnem upravljanju avtorskih in sorodnih pravic za zakonite spletne glasbene storitve
– having regard to its resolution of 25 September 2008 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0462 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0462 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. januarja 2004 o okviru Skupnosti za kolektivne organizacije na področju avtorskih in sorodnih pravic
– having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2004 on a Community framework for collective management societies in the field of copyright and neighbouring rights
UL C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
OJ C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije 2005/737/ES z dne 18. maja 2005 o kolektivnem čezmejnem upravljanju avtorskih in sorodnih pravic za zakonite spletne glasbene storitve
– having regard to the Commission Recommendation 2005/737/EC of 18 October 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services
UL L 276, 21.10.2005 , str.
OJ L 276, 21.10.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. aprila 2004 o upravljanju avtorske in sorodnih pravic na notranjem trgu ( KOM(2004)0261 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 16 April 2004 on the management of copyright and related rights in the internal market ( COM(2004)0261 ),
– ob upoštevanju direktive 96/9/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 1996 o pravnem varstvu baz podatkov
– having regard to Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases
UL L 77, 27.3.1996 , str.
OJ L 77, 27.3.1996, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/116/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o trajanju varstva avtorske pravice in določenih sorodnih pravic
– having regard to Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights
UL L 372, 27.12.2006 , str.
OJ L 372, 27.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju resolucije 27. septembra 2007 z naslovom „i2010: na poti do evropske digitalne knjižnice”
– having regard to its resolution of 27 September 2007 entitled “i2010: towards a European digital library”
UL C 219 E, 28.8.2008, p.
OJ C 219 E, 28.8.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6-0017/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6-0017/2009 ),
Avtorske pravice v informacijski družbi
Copyright and the information society
2. opozarja, da so Evropska skupnost in države članice dolžne spoštovati mednarodne predpise o avtorskih pravicah, in sicer drugi odstavek 9. člena Bernske konvencije za varstvo književnih in umetniških del iz leta 1986 in 13. člen Sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine, čigar pogoje je mogoče najti v odstavku 5 člena 5 direktive 2001/29/ES;
Recalls that the European Community and its Member States are required to respect the international copyright framework, namely Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works of 1886, and Article 13 of the Agreement on Trade‑Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, the terms of which are set out in Article 5(5) of Directive 2001/29/EC;
5. obžaluje, da Komisija v svojem poročilu ni upoštevala pravne prakse držav, ki so se Evropski uniji priključile po sprejetju omenjene direktive 2001/29/ES;
Regrets that, in its report, the Commission disregards the legislative practices of those countries which joined the European Union after the adoption of Directive 2001/29/EC;
7. meni, da je treba uporabo direktive 2001/29/ES postaviti v širši okvir in še posebej upoštevati določbe v zvezi z elektronskim poslovanjem iz Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/31/ES z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu
Considers that application of Directive 2001/29/EC must take place within a broader framework, which should in particular take into account the provisions on electronic commerce set out in Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market
UL L 178, 17.7.2000 , str.
OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p.
1. , Direktive 2004/48/ES in določbe v zvezi z varovanjem podatkov iz Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov
1. , Directive 2004/48/EC and the provisions on data protection set out in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
UL L 281, 23.11.1995 , str.
OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
9. ocenjuje, da predstavlja direktiva 2001/29/ES pravično ravnovesje med interesi posameznih vpletenih strani;
Takes the view that Directive 2001/29/EC constitutes a fair balance between the interests of the various parties involved;
22. poudarja, da so evropski predpisi o avtorskih pravicah, ki določajo visoko raven zaščite, potrebni za nadaljnje inovacije in naložbe urednikov v nove elektronske izdelke in storitve, ki bistveno prispevajo k prizadevanjem Evropske unije, da postane najpomembnejše, na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu;
Emphasises that a European copyright framework providing a high level of protection is a necessary condition for continued innovation and investment by publishers in new electronic products and services, which make an essential contribution to the European Union’s efforts to become the main player in the knowledge-based economy at world level;
Sistem izjem
The regime of exceptions
33. meni, da je pristop, ki temeljni na izčrpnem seznamu neobveznih izjem, kot je bil določen z direktivo 2001/29/ES, dovolj prožen in še naprej sprejemljiv;
Takes the view that the approach chosen by Directive 2001/29/EC, based on an exhaustive list of non-compulsory exceptions, is sufficiently flexible and still valid;
35. meni, da bi se izjema iz člena 5(3)(b) iz direktive 2001/29/ES dosledno morala izvajati v korist invalidnih oseb;
Considers that the exception provided for in Article 5(3), point (b), of Directive 2001/29/EC for the benefit of people with disabilities should be applied fully;
38. ocenjuje, da je treba spodbujati interoperabilnost med spletnimi storitvami in programsko opremo, ki ponuja storitve, da bi okrepili zakonito ponudbo in razvili konkurenčni spletni trg;
Takes the view that interoperability between on-line services and the various types of equipment that receive such services must be encouraged with a view to promoting legal supply and developing a competitive on-line market;
Uveljavljanje pravic
Implementation of rights
42. meni, da mora boj proti piratstvu vključevati več vidikov: izobraževanje in preprečevanje, razvoj in dostopnost zakonite digitalne ponudbe ter sodelovanje in kaznovanje;
Considers that the fight against piracy must be waged on a number of fronts: education and prevention, development and accessibility of legitimate digital supply, cooperation and legal penalties;
47. podpira zamisel, da bi v državah članicah vzpostavili mehanizme, ki bi na zahtevo imetnikov pravic s postopnim pristopom izvajali nadzor nad spoštovanjem avtorskih pravic na internetu;
Supports the setting-up in the individual Member States of mechanisms, to be employed on instruction from right holders and using a graduated approach, for the enforcement of copyright on the internet;
51. spodbuja uvedbo in uporabo novih, brezplačnih in prenosljivih evropskih spletnih tehnologij za identifikacijo in prepoznavanje del ter izraža podporo obstoječim tehnologijam za lažje ločevanje piratskih izdelkov od zakonitih;
Encourages the launch and use of new, freely available and downloadable EU internet technologies for identification and recognition, and supports the existing ones, with a view to distinguishing more easily between legal and pirated products;
Varstvo avtorskih in sorodnih pravic v okviru informacijske družbe je pomemben element razvoja gospodarskega okolja na notranjem trgu.
Protection of copyright and related rights in the information society forms an important part of the development of economic life in the single market.
Z avtorskimi pravicami se avtorju tradicionalno priznata dve glavni premoženjski pravici: pravica reproduciranja in pravica priobčitve javnosti.
Copyright traditionally gives the author two major economic rights: the right of reproduction and the right of making available to the public.
Z informacijsko družbo se odpirajo novi trgi, na katerih je mogoče varovana dela uporabljati prek elektronskih izdelkov in interaktivnih storitev.
The information society has opened up new markets in which protected works can be exploited through the media of electronic products and interactive services.
V tem okviru je varstvo avtorskih in sorodnih pravic eden od pogojev za spodbujanje ustvarjalnosti, inovativnosti in različnih kulturnih identitet.
In this context, protection of copyright is one of the necessary conditions for stimulating creativity and innovation and promoting different cultural identities.
Avtorske in sorodne pravice niso le naknadno plačilo avtorju za ustvarjeno delo, ampak so hkrati sredstvo, s katerim se ga spodbudi k nadaljnjemu ustvarjanju.
Copyright is not only an ex-post reward for authors’ work, but also a way of encouraging them to create more.
Spodbujevalni vidik je še pomembnejši za producente in posrednike pri distribuciji.
This incentive aspect is even more important for producers and distributors.
Imetnikom pravic mora biti torej omogočeno, da varstvo avtorskih ali sorodnih pravic, kjer so te priznane, uveljavljajo ne glede na državne meje ali načine uporabe, in sicer celo obdobje veljavnosti teh pravic.
Rightholders must therefore have the chance to benefit from the protection afforded by copyright and related rights where these rights are established, regardless of national frontiers and modes of use, throughout their entire period of validity.
Piratstvo v informacijski družbi ovira nadaljnjo ustvarjalno dejavnost, ki mora biti finančno donosna.
Piracy in the information society is an obstacle to the exercise of a creative activity which should be financially profitable.
Treba je upoštevati dejstvo, da imajo informacijske dobrine netipično strukturo stroškov, saj večina izdatkov odpade na zasnovo in produkcijo.
It must be borne in mind that information property has an atypical cost structure in which the bulk of the costs lie in its design and production.
Treba je preprečiti, da bi tehnološki napredek privedel do izkrivljenja avtorskih pravic
The nature of copyright must not be allowed to change as a result of technological progress
Boj proti piratstvu mora vključevati več vidikov: izobraževanje in preprečevanje, razvoj dostopnosti zakonite digitalne ponudbe ter sodelovanje in kazenske sankcije.
The fight against piracy must take place on a number of fronts: education and prevention, development of accessibility to the legal digital market, cooperation and legal sanctions.
Danes je treba zagotoviti ravnovesje med legitimnimi interesi avtorjev ter interesi javnosti in družbe v skladu s Splošno deklaracijo ZN o človekovih pravicah, katere 27. člen se glasi: ‘ (1) Vsakdo ima pravico prosto se udeleževati kulturnega življenja svoje skupnosti, uživati umetnost in sodelovati pri napredku znanosti ter biti deležen koristi, ki iz tega izhajajo.
It is now necessary to strike a balance between the legitimate interests of authors and the interests of the public and society, in the light of Article 27 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which stipulates that: ‘ (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
(2) Vsakdo ima pravico do varstva moralnih in premoženjskih koristi, ki izhajajo iz kateregakoli znanstvenega, književnega ali umetniškega dela, katerega avtor je.“
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author’.
Direktiva 2001/29/ES o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi ima trojni cilj:
Directive 2001/29 EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society has a threefold objective:
– – ponovno utrditi avtorske pravice in pravice, ki jih uživajo imetniki sorodnih pravic, ob upoštevanju posebnosti digitalnega okolja;
– to reaffirm the rights of authors and holders of related rights while taking into account the specificities of digital media,
– – opredeliti sistem izjem za te pravic;
– to define the regime of exceptions to these rights,
– – zagotoviti pravno varstvo tehničnih ukrepov, uporabljenih za varovanje del in izvedb, da se preprečijo dejavnosti, ki jih imetniki pravic niso odobrili.
– to provide legal protection for the technical measures attached to works and services in order to prevent unauthorised acts by rightholders.