natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(d) lahko sistem prikaže izjave posameznikov o podpori v obliki, ki ustreza vzorcu iz Priloge III, da se omogoči nadzor držav članic v skladu s členom 9(2).
(d) the system can generate individual statements of support in a form complying with the model set out in Annex III, in order to allow for the control by the Member States, in accordance with Article 9(2).
(d) lahko sistem prikaže izjave posameznikov o podpori v obliki, ki vsebuje podatke, razvidne iz vzorca iz Priloge III, da se omogoči nadzor držav članic v skladu s členom 9(2).
(d) the system can generate individual statements of support in a form which contains the information required in the example provided in Annex III, in order to allow for the control by Member States, in accordance with Article 9(2).
Zato, da sistem državljanske pobude ostane uporabniku prijazen in da se ne pojavijo nepotrebne skrbi v zvezi z varstvom podatkov, se od podpisnikov ne bo zahtevala številka osebne izkaznice.
In order to keep the citizens' initiative scheme user-friendly and not to provoke undue concerns about data protection, no signatory shall be asked to provide a personal identity card number.
V 6 mesecih od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe Komisija v skladu s postopkom sprejetja predpisa iz člena 19(2) sprejme tehnične specifikacije za izvajanje odstavka 4.
Within six months following the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall adopt technical specifications for the implementation of paragraph 4, in accordance with the regulatory procedure laid down in Article 19(2).
Komisija da na razpolago varna orodja za zbiranje podpisov na spletu na način, ki ne bi ogrožal zasebnosti.
The Commission shall make available secure tools enabling online signatures to be collected in a way which does not jeopardise privacy.
Podpisniki državljanske pobude prihajajo iz vsaj ene četrtine držav članic.
The signatories of a citizens' initiative shall come from at least one quarter of Member States.
V eni četrtini držav članic je število podpisnikov najmanj enako najmanjšemu številu državljanov iz Priloge I.
In one quarter of Member States, signatories shall comprise at least the minimum number of citizens set out in Annex I.
Šteje se, da podpisniki prihajajo iz države članice, ki je izdala osebni dokument, naveden v njihovi izjavi o podpori.
Signatories shall be considered as coming from the Member State which issued the identification document indicated in their statement of support.
Šteje se, da podpisniki prihajajo iz države članice, v kateri imajo svoj naslov, kot je navedeno v njihovi izjavi o podpori.
Signatories shall be considered to come from the Member State in which they have their address, as indicated in their statement of support.
Organizator na podlagi 300 000 izjav o podpori, zbranih v skladu s členom 5 od podpisnikov iz vsaj treh držav članic, pri Komisiji vloži vlogo za odločitev o dopustnosti predlagane državljanske pobude .
After having collected 300.000 statements of support in accordance with Article 5 from signatories coming from at least three Member States , the organiser shall submit to the Commission a request for a decision on the admissibility of the proposed citizens' initiative.
Organizator v ta namen uporabi obrazec iz Priloge V .
For this purpose the organiser shall use the form set out in Annex V .
Po prijavi državljanske pobude Komisija brez odlašanja odloči o njeni dopustnosti .
After the citizens' initiative has been registered, the Commission shall examine its admissibility without delay .
V odločitvi je navedeno, kateri pravni akt ali ukrep je po mnenju Komisije primeren za uresničitev ciljev državljanske pobude v primeru, da bi bila ta uspešna.
It shall indicate which legal act or measure the Commission considers is appropriate to achieve the objectives of the citizens' initiative in the event that that initiative is successful.
Organizacijski odbor mora dovolj zgodaj vedeti, katere vrste pravni akt ali ukrep bi bil primeren za uresničitev ciljev državljanske pobude, če bi bila ta uspešna.
It is important for an organising committee to know early enough which kind of a legal act or measure would be appropriate in order to achieve the objectives of the citizens' initiative in case it would be successful.
Na podlagi zbranega ustreznega števila izjav podpisnikov o podpori v skladu s členoma 5 in 7 organizator izjave o podpori v papirni ali elektronski obliki predloži pristojnim organom iz člena 14 v preverjanje in potrditev.
After having collected the necessary statements of support from signatories in accordance with Articles 5 and 7, the organiser shall submit the statements of support, in paper or in electronic form, to the relevant competent authorities provided for in Article 14 for verification and certification.
Organizacijski odbor uniči vse prejete izjave o podpori posamezne državljanske pobude in njihove morebitne dvojnike najpozneje v mesecu dni po objavi sporočila Evropske komisije v skladu s členom 11(2) .
The organising committee shall destroy all statements of support received for a given citizens' initiative and any copies thereof at the latest one month after publication of the European Commission's communication in accordance with Article 11(2) .
Izjave o podpori bi bilo treba uničiti po objavi sporočila Evropske komisije.
Destroying of all statement of support forms should take place after the publication of the European Commission's communication.
Organizacijski odbor bi moral imeti možnost, da vse podpisnike obvesti o sporočilo Evropske komisije o določeni državljanski pobudi.
The organising committee should have a chance to inform all signatories about the European Commission's communication on a given citizens' initiative.
Za celoten postopek je zelo pomembno, da so državljani obveščeni o nadaljnjih dogodkih v zvezi s predlogom, ki ga podpirajo.
It is extremely important, for the whole process, that citizens are informed about the follow-up of the proposal they support.
Za namene izvajanja člena 6(5) Komisiji pomaga neodvisni odbor z ustreznim tehničnim znanjem .
For the purpose of the implementation of Article 6(5), the Commission shall be assisted by an independent committee possessing appropriate technical knowledge .
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v dveh letih od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe predloži poročilo o njenem izvajanju.
Two years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Regulation.
Pregled bi bilo treba opraviti prej.
The review should be done earlier.
Dve leti se zdita dovolj za oceno prvih pobud.
Two years seems enough in order to assess the first initiatives.
Priloga III – okvir 2 – točka 4 a (novo)
Annex III – box 2 – point 4 a (new)
Viri financiranja*:
Funding sources*:
Priloga III – okvir 3 – točka 4
Annex III – box 3 – point 4
Datum in kraj rojstva*:
Date and place of birth*:
Datum rojstva*:
Date of birth*:
Podatek o kraju rojstva ni nujen.
Information on place of birth is not needed.
Poročevalka predlaga njegovo črtanje, da bi bil obrazec bolj enostaven.
Rapporteur proposes to delete it in order to simplify the form.
Priloga III – okvir 3 – točka 6
Annex III – box 3 – point 6
Priloga VIII – točka 6
Annex VIII – point 6
Polno ime, poštni naslov in elektronski poštni naslov vsakega člana organizacijskega odbora .
Full name, postal address and e-mail address of each member of the organising committee .
Róża grofica Thun und Hohenstein
Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein
Magdi Cristiano Allam, Maria Badia i Cutchet, Zoltán Bagó, Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Piotr Borys, Jean-Marie Cavada, Silvia Costa, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Petra Kammerevert, Morten Løkkegaard, Marek Henryk Migalski, Doris Pack, Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli), Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Marco Scurria, Joanna Senyszyn, Emil Stojanov (Emil Stoyanov), Hannu Takkula, Sabine Verheyen, Milan Zver
Magdi Cristiano Allam, Maria Badia i Cutchet, Zoltán Bagó, Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Piotr Borys, Jean-Marie Cavada, Silvia Costa, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Petra Kammerevert, Morten Løkkegaard, Marek Henryk Migalski, Doris Pack, Chrysoula Paliadeli, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Marco Scurria, Joanna Senyszyn, Emil Stoyanov, Hannu Takkula, Sabine Verheyen, Milan Zver
Ivo Belet, Luigi Berlinguer, Nadja Hirsch, Oriol Junqueras Vies, Seán Kelly, Timothy Kirkhope, Mitro Repo, Monika Smolková, Rui Tavares, Róża grofica Thun und Hohenstein
Ivo Belet, Luigi Berlinguer, Nadja Hirsch, Oriol Junqueras Vies, Seán Kelly, Timothy Kirkhope, Mitro Repo, Monika Smolková, Rui Tavares, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o državljanski pobudi
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens' initiative
Pripravljavki mnenja: Kinga Göncz, Cecilia Wikström
Draftswomen: Kinga Göncz, Cecilia Wikström
Člen 11(4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji v demokratično delovanje Unije uvaja pomembno novost, saj zagotavlja novo, konkretno orodje za državljansko udeležbo in vseevropsko razpravo:
Article 11(4) of the Treaty on European Union introduces an important innovation in the democratic functioning of the Union by providing a new concrete tool for civic participation and pan-European debate:
Evropska državljanska pobuda uvaja nov koncept nadnacionalne demokracije in v EU prinaša participativno demokracijo.
The European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) introduces a new concept of trans-national democracy and brings participatory democracy to the EU.
Z državljansko pobudo lahko državljani EU neposredno pozovejo Evropsko komisijo, naj pripravi zakonodajni predlog.
Through the ECI, EU citizens can appeal directly to the European Commission to initiate a legal act.
Lizbonska pogodba je na nek način ustvarila četrto institucionalno telo Unije: milijon državljanov.
In a way, the Lisbon Treaty has created a fourth institutional body of the EU: one million citizens.
Pripravljavki mnenja pozdravljata predlog Komisije, saj vključevanje civilne družbe v oblikovanje politike in pripravo odločitev krepi demokratično legitimnost javnih institucij, Evropsko unijo pa približuje državljanom.
Your rapporteurs welcome the Commission proposal, as involving civil society in policy shaping and preparations of decisions strengthens the democratic legitimacy of public institutions and brings the European Union closer to its citizens.
Vseeno pa menita, da bi morala biti državljanska pobuda zasnovana kar se da pragmatično, in da bi se bilo treba izogniti zapletenim administrativnim postopkom.
However, your rapporteurs believe that the citizens' initiative should be designed as pragmatically as possible, and complicated administrative procedures should be avoided.
Veselilo bi ju tudi, če bi bilo dopustnih kar največ sproženih pobud.
They would also like to see that as many launched initiatives as possible will be granted admissibility.
Za to pa morajo biti postopkovna pravila v kar največji meri poenostavljena.
In order to do that the procedural rules must be as facilitated as possible.
Pripravljavki mnenja imata naslednje večje pomisleke in predloge, kako besedilo spremeniti.
The rapporteurs have the following main concerns and suggestions to change the proposal:
Po njunem mnenju bi morala biti najnižja starost za podporo pobudi 16 in ne 18 let.
According to the rapporteurs, the minimum age for supporting an initiative should be 16 years in all Member States.
Člen 9 PEU določa, da so vsi državljani Unije deležni enake obravnave.
Article 9 TEU states that all Union's citizens should receive equal attention.
Dejavno državljanstvo, socialna vključenost in solidarnost mladih so bistvenega pomena za prihodnost Evrope, zato bi znižanje starostne omejitve pripomoglo k dvigu zavesti med mladimi za evropska vprašanja.
Active citizenship, social inclusion and solidarity of young people are crucial for the future of Europe, and decreasing the age limit would help raise awareness towards European issues among young people.
Poleg tega državljanska pobuda ni instrument odločanja, ampak zgolj pobuda za delovni program, podpora pobudi pa je nekaj povsem drugega od dejanja glasovanja.
Moreover, the ECI is not a decision-making instrument but only an agenda-setting initiative, and supporting an initiative is completely different from the act of voting.
Povezovanje najnižje starosti z nacionalno starostno mejo za udeležbo na volitvah bi ustvarilo neenakosti zaradi razlik v nacionalnih zahtevah, to pa je razlog, zakaj se pripravljavki mnenja zavzemata za enotno starost 16 let v vseh državah članicah.
Furthermore, linking the minimum age to national voting age requirements would create inequality due to differences in national requirements, which is why your rapporteurs prefer the age of 16 years to be applicable in all Member States.
Glede obsega zbiranja pripravljavki mnenja menita, da bi bilo dovolj, če bi se podpisi zbirali v četrtini držav članic in ne v tretjini, saj bo v vsaki državi članici, kjer se bodo podpisi zbirali, potrebno veliko časa in virov za upravljanje in prevode.
As for the scope of collection , your rapporteurs consider that it should be enough to collect signatures in one fourth of the Member States instead of one third, as in every Member State where signatures shall be collected, a lot of time and resources are required for administration and translation.
Ker se želita pripravljavki mnenja izogniti nevarnosti, da bi pobude propadle zaradi časovnih omejitev ali pomanjkanja finančne podpore, predlagata, da je četrtina držav članic dovolj, saj to število še vedno zajema velik del Unije.
Since the rapporteurs want to eliminate the risk of initiatives falling due to time limits or lack of financial support, they suggest that one fourth of the Member States should be sufficient since that number still covers a big part of the EU.
Če upoštevamo, da je Komisija v svojem predlogu zaprosila za dvomesečni rok za preučitev tega, ali je pobuda dopustna, se zdi, da je eno leto za zbiranje podpisov prekratko.
Considering that the Commission requested in its proposal a period of two months to investigate if an initiative is admissible, the time limit of one year for collecting signatures seems to be too short.
Pripravljavki mnenja predlagata, naj se čas za zbiranje podpisov podaljša na štiri leta, da bi na ta način tudi pobude brez finančne podpore imele možnost, da zberejo milijon podpisov.
Your rapporteurs suggest that the time limit for the collection of signatures should be extended to four years in order to ensure that also initiatives without financial support have a chance to reach one million signatures .
Pri vprašanju dopustnosti pripravljavki mnenja ne vidita potrebe za to, da se 300.000 podpisov zbere še preden Komisija preveri dopustnost.
Regarding the issue of admissibility , your rapporteurs consider that there is no need to collect 300.000 signatures before the admissibility is checked by the Commission.
Prepričani sta, da bi bilo 5.000 podpisov dovolj, kot tudi ni potrebe po tem, da bi podpisniki prihajali iz več kot ene države članice.
Your rapporteurs firmly believe that 5.000 signatures should be sufficient and signatories should not need to come from more than one Member State .
Pripravljavki mnenja predlagata tudi, da Komisija dopustnost pobude prouči v enem mesecu in ne v dveh, da se ne upočasni zagon zbiranja podpisov.
Your rapporteurs also suggest that the Commission shall investigate the admissibility of an initiative within one month instead of two, so that the momentum of collecting signatures is not slowed down.
Pripravljavki mnenja sta tudi prepričani, da bi bilo treba predloge, ki so bodisi odkrito bodisi prikrito naperjeni proti vrednotam Evropske unije, šteti za nedopustne.
Your rapporteurs also believe that proposals either manifestly or covertly against the values of the European Union should be considered inadmissible .
Glede spletnega zbiranja podpisov pripravljavki mnenja predlagata, da Komisija odpre osrednje spletno mesto z imenom „citizensinitiative.eu“, kjer bi bilo možno vse pobude prijaviti in kjer bi jih državljani lahko našli in podpisali.
As far as the online collection of signatures is concerned , your rapporteurs suggest that the Commission shall launch a central website named "citizensinitiative.eu", where all initiatives should be registered and all initiatives can be found and signed by citizens.
Ta rešitev bi bila zelo dobra iz več razlogov.
This solution would be highly desirable for several reasons.
Prvič zaradi varovanja podatkov: če bi Komisija vzpostavila in vodila osrednje spletno mesto, bi bilo zagotovljeno, da se pravila in predpisi o varovanju osebnih podatkov upoštevajo.
Firstly, because of data protection concerns , i.e. if the Commission set up and operated a central website, it would be guaranteed that rules and regulations concerning personal data protection are respected.
Pripravljavki mnenja sta trdno prepričani, da ne moremo od nobenega pobudnika državljanske pobude pričakovati, da bo vzpostavil in vodil sistem spletnega zbiranja podpisov, ki bi izpolnjeval vse ustrezne predpise o zasebnosti podatkov.
Your rapporteurs firmly believe that it cannot be expected from any initiator of a citizens' initiative to set up and operate an online signature-collecting system, which meets all the relevant data-privacy regulations.
Poleg tega bi, če bi moral vsak pobudnik odpreti lastno spletišče, zbiranje podpisov ne bilo enotno z vidika varovanja podatkov.
Moreover, by making each initiator launch his/her own website, the collection of signatures would not be uniform from a data protection point of view.
Drugič, predlog Komisije bi bil problematičen tudi zato, ker bi dodatno obremenil ne le pobudnike, ampak tudi države članice, ker bi te morale preverjati, ali so sistemi spletnega zbiranja v skladu s predpisi Komisije, izdati pa bi morale tudi potrdilo o skladnosti vsakega spletnega mesta.
Secondly, the Commission's proposal would also be problematic as it would impose an extra burden not only on the initiators, but on Member States as well, as they should verify the conformity of the online collection systems with the regulations set out by the Commission, and they should also issue a certificate confirming the conformity concerning each website.
Tretjič, če bi bile vse državljanske pobude zbrane na enem samem spletnem mestu, bi bilo dostopanje do njih veliko lažje, saj bi lahko zainteresirani državljani vse pobude našli, podpisali in sledili hitro in brez težav.
Thirdly, having all citizens' initiatives on one single website would make the accessibility of the initiatives much easier, as interested citizens could find, sign and follow the progress of all the initiatives quickly and without any difficulties.
Tako sta pripravljavki mnenja prepričani, da bi Komisija morala vzpostaviti osrednje spletno mesto, v njegove naloge pa bi morali biti vključeni pristojni organi držav članic, ki bi odločili, katere podatke potrebujejo za kasnejše identificiranje in preverjanje istovetnosti podpisnikov.
Thus, your rapporteurs believe that the Commission should set up a central website, in the task of which it should involve relevant authorities of Member States in order to decide what data they need to identify and verify the identity of signatories later.
Spletno mesto bi moralo biti zasnovano tako, da bi pobudnik ob podpisovanju pobude na spletu najprej odgovoril na vprašanje o državljanstvu in bi šele potem vnesel, kar bi zahtevali pristojni organi.
The website should be constructed in such a way that when signing an initiative online the signatory would be first asked about his/her nationality, then only those fields should be filled in which are required by the relevant authorities.
Razlog za to rešitev je, da imajo različne države članice različne vrste identifikacijskih številk in da za ugotavljanje istovetnosti podpisnikov potrebujejo različne podatke.
The reason behind this solution is that different Member States have different types of identification numbers and need different data to verify the identity of the signatories.
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(3) Ti postopki in pogoji bi morali biti jasni, preprosti, uporabniku prijazni in sorazmerni z naravo državljanske pobude , da bi spodbujali sodelovanje državljanov in naredili Evropsko unijo dostopnejšo .
(3) These procedures and conditions should be clear, simple, user-friendly and proportionate to the nature of the citizens' initiative , so as to encourage participation by citizens and to make the Union more accessible .
Komisija in Evropski parlament bi morala prek svojih predstavništev in pisarn v državah članicah državljanom na njihovo prošnjo zagotoviti informacije in neuradne nasvete o državljanskih pobudah, zlasti o merilih za dopustnost, vrednotah in pristojnostih Unije in evropskih pogodbah.
The Commission and the European Parliament, via their respective representations and offices in the Member States, should upon request provide citizens with information and informal advice about citizens' initiatives, notably as regards the admissibility criteria, the values and competencies of the Union and the European Treaties.
V zagotovitev, da državljanska pobuda predstavlja interese Unije, bi moralo biti najmanjše število ena petina držav članic.
In order to ensure that a citizens' initiative is representative of a Union interest, this number should be set at one fifth of Member States.
Ta bi bila 16 let .
This should be set at the age of 16 years .
Dejavno državljanstvo, socialna vključenost in solidarnost mladih so bistvenega pomena za prihodnost Evrope.
Active citizenship, social inclusion and solidarity of young people are crucial for the future of Europe.
Poleg tega je podpora pobudi nekaj povsem drugega od dejanja glasovanja, zato bi bilo primerno, da se vključijo tudi mladi.
Moreover, supporting an initiative is completely different from the act of voting, therefore, it would be appropriate to involve also young people.
Nenazadnje bi povezovanje najnižje starosti z nacionalno starostno mejo za udeležbo na volitvah ustvarilo neenakosti, saj se nacionalni pogoji med seboj razlikujejo.
Furthermore, linking the minimum age to national voting age would create inequality due to differences in national requirements.
Ta bi morala imeti obliko državljanskega odbora, katerega člani bi bile fizične osebe (organizatorji) iz petine držav članic, saj bi na ta način spodbujali odpiranje vprašanj in razmislek o njih na evropski ravni.
This should take the form of a citizens' committee, composed of natural persons (organisers) coming from one fifth of Member States, in order to encourage the emergence of European-wide issues and to foster reflection on those issues.
(7b) Pomembno je vključiti mlade in jih spodbuditi k sodelovanju pri državljanskih pobudah.
(7b) It is important to involve young people and to encourage them to participate in the citizens' initiatives.
V predlogu je preverjanje podpisov naloga držav članic.
In the proposal, Member States have the responsibility for checking signatures.
Da bi pritegnili mlade, bi se morali osredotočiti na vzpostavitev sistema za preverjanje podpisov na ravni celotne EU, s čimer bi zagotovili enotno najnižjo starost.
To involve young people, we should aim at developing a system for checking signatures at EU wide level in order to ensure a common minimum age.