natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– proizvode, ki se bodo razdeljevali, upoštevajoč, da gre za sezonske in lokalne proizvode;
- the products to be distributed, taking account of the fact that seasonal and local products are concerned;
– starostne skupine v šolski populaciji, ki bodo ta sistem koristile;
- the age groups of the beneficiary school population;
– šole, ki bodo sodelovale v tem sistemu .
- the schools participating in the Scheme .
Države članice v skladu z objektivnimi merili pri izvajanju tega sistema dajo prednost tradicionalnim sortam in lokalno pridelanemu sadju in zelenjavi ter podpirajo majhne pridelovalce.
In accordance with objective criteria, Member States shall give priority to locally produced, traditional fruit and vegetables and support smaller farms in implementing the scheme.
Spremljevalni ukrepi vključujejo nudenje zdravstvenega in prehrambenega svetovanja, informacij o prednostih sadja za zdravje, prilagojenih starosti učencev, kot tudi informacij o posameznih značilnostih ekološkega kmetijstva.
Accompanying measures shall include the provision of health and dietary advice, information on the health benefits of fruit, appropriate to the age of the students, as well as information on the particular characteristics of organic farming.
Del II – Naslov I – Poglavje IV – oddelek IV a – pododdelek II a – člen 103ga – točka 3 – črka a
Part II – Title I – Chapter IV – Section IV a – Subsection II a – Article 103g a – Point 3 – letter a
(a) ne presega 90 milijonov EUR na šolsko leto,
(a) exceed EUR 90 million per school year,
(a) ne presega 500 milijonov EUR na šolsko leto,
(a) exceed EUR 500 million per school year,
Zaradi visokih cen hrane ostajajo obsežna sredstva iz naslova 2 (odhodki za kmetijstvo).
Due to high food prices, substantial unused funds remain under Heading 2 (agricultural expenditure).
Del II – Naslov I – Poglavje IV – oddelek 4a – pododdelek IIa – člen 103ga – točka 3(b)
Part II – Title I – Chapter IV – Section 4a – subsection IIa – Article 103 ga – Point 3(b)
(b) ne presega 50 % stroškov dobave in povezanih stroškov iz odstavka 1 ali 75 % takih stroškov v regijah, ki so upravičene do pomoči iz konvergentnega cilja ,
b) exceed 50% of the costs of supply and related costs referred to in paragraph 1 , or 75% of such costs in the regions eligible under the Convergence Objective ,
(b) ne presega stroškov dobave in povezanih stroškov ter stroškov spremljevalnih ukrepov iz odstavka 1,
b) exceed the costs of supply and related costs and those of the accompanying measures, as referred to in paragraph 1,
Del II – Naslov I – Poglavje IV – oddelek 4a – pododdelek IIa – člen 103 ga – točka 3(c)
Part II – Title I – Chapter IV – Section 4a – subsection IIa – Article 103 ga – Point 3(c)
(c) ne zajema drugih stroškov razen stroškov dobave in povezanih stroškov iz odstavka 1 in
c) cover costs other than the costs of supply and related costs referred to in paragraph 1, and
(c) ne zajema drugih stroškov razen stroškov dobave in povezanih stroškov ter stroškov spremljevalnih ukrepov, ki so potrebni, da bi se zagotovila učinkovitost sistema, iz odstavka 1 in
c) cover costs other than the costs of supply and related costs and those of the accompanying measures required to ensure the effectiveness of the Scheme, as referred to in paragraph 1, and
Člen 2 – točka 1 – podtočka a
Article 2 – point 1 - subpoint a
Del II – Naslov I – Poglavje IV – oddelek IVa – pododdelek IIa – člen 103ga – odstavek 3 – točka d
Part II – Title I – Chapter IV – Section IVa – Subsection IIa – Article 103ga – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) se ne uporablja za nadomestitev sedanjega financiranja katerega koli od obstoječih nacionalnih sistemov razdeljevanja sadja v šolah ali drugih sistemov za razdeljevanje v šolah, ki vključujejo sadje.
(d) be used to replace current funding for any existing national school fruit schemes or other school distribution schemes that include fruit.
(d) se ne uporablja za nadomestitev sedanjega javnega financiranja katerega koli od obstoječih nacionalnih sistemov razdeljevanja sadja v šolah ali drugih sistemov za razdeljevanje v šolah, ki vključujejo sadje.
(d) be used to replace current public funding for any existing national school fruit schemes or other school distribution schemes that include fruit.
Predlog spremembe zgolj pojasnjuje besedilo, in sicer da se točka (d) nanaša samo na javno financiranje, kot je razvidno iz sedanjega besedila.
The amendment merely clarifies the text to the effect that point (d) applies to public funding only, as the present wording appears to imply.
Zasebno financiranje, kot so na primer donacije, se ne bi smelo obravnavati pod točko (d).
Private funding, by donations for example, should not be affected by point (d).
Del II – Naslov I – Poglavje IV – oddelek IVa – pododdelek IIa – člen 103ga – odstavek 5
Part II – Title I – Chapter IV – Section IVa – Subsection IIa – Article 103ga – paragraph 5
Sistem razdeljevanja sadja v šolah v Skupnosti ne posega v noben ločen nacionalni sistem razdeljevanja sadja v šolah, ki upošteva zakonodajo Skupnosti.
The Community school fruit scheme shall be without prejudice to any separate national school fruit schemes which respect Community law.
Sistem razdeljevanja svežega sadja v šolah v Skupnosti ne posega v noben ločen nacionalni sistem razdeljevanja sadja v šolah, ki upošteva zakonodajo Skupnosti.
The Community school fresh fruit scheme shall be without prejudice to any separate national school fruit schemes which respect Community law.
Pilotni projekti, ki se poskusno izvajajo na manjšem številu izobraževalnih ustanov v omejenem časovnem obdobju, se ne prištevajo pod nacionalni sistem iz odstavka 3(d).
Pilot projects, conducted on an experimental basis in a small number of educational establishments for limited periods of time, shall not be considered national schemes as referred to in paragraph 3(d).
Namen je, da se načelo obstoječega nacionalnega sistema razjasni, tako da se omogoči lažje izvajanje načela dodajanja.
The idea is to clarify the concept of an ‘existing national scheme’ so as to enable the additionality principle to be put into effect more easily.
Del II – Naslov I – Poglavje IV – oddelek IVa – pododdelek IIa – člen 103g – točka 6
Part II – Title I – Chapter IV – section IVa – subsection IIa – Article 103g – Point 6
Skupnost lahko na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 financira tudi ukrepe informiranja, spremljanja in vrednotenja , namenjene ozaveščanju javnosti, in povezane ukrepe mrežnega povezovanja.“;
The Community may also finance, under Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, information, monitoring and evaluation measures relating to the School Fruit Scheme, including raising public awareness of it, and related networking measures.";
Skupnost lahko na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 financira tudi ukrepe informiranja, spremljanja in vrednotenja v zvezi s sistemom razdeljevanja svežega sadja v šolah , vključno z ozaveščanjem javnosti o njem , in povezane ukrepe mrežnega povezovanja.“;
The Community may also finance, under Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, information, monitoring and evaluation measures relating to the School Fresh Fruit Scheme, including raising public awareness of it, and related networking measures.";
Člen 184 – točka 6
Article 184 – Point 6
(6) pred 31. avgustom 2012 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi sistema razdeljevanja sadja v šolah iz člena 103 ga, če je potrebno opremljenega z ustreznimi predlogi.
(6) before 31 August 2012 to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the School Fruit Scheme provided for in Article 103ga, accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals.
Poročilo zlasti obravnava vprašanja glede tega, v kolikšni meri je sistem spodbujal vzpostavitev dobrega delovanja sistema razdeljevanja sadja v šolah v državah članicah ter učinek sistema za izboljšanje prehranskih navad otrok.
The report shall in particular address the issues of the extent to which the scheme has promoted the establishment of well functioning School Fruit Schemes in Member States and the impact of the Scheme on the improvement of children’s eating habits.
Poročilo zlasti obravnava vprašanja glede naslednjega:
The report shall in particular address the issues of :
– v kolikšni meri je sistem spodbujal vzpostavitev dobrega delovanja sistema razdeljevanja sadja v šolah v državah članicah ter učinek sistema za izboljšanje prehranskih navad otrok ;
- the extent to which the scheme has promoted the establishment of well functioning School Fruit Schemes in Member States and the impact of the Scheme on the improvement of children’s eating habits ;
– v kolikšni meri je ali ni vplivala izbira nacionalnega sofinanciranja prek prispevkov staršev na doseg in učinkovitost sistema;
- the extent to which opting for national cofinancing, by means of a parental contribution, has or has not influenced the outreach and effectiveness of the scheme;
– pomen in vpliv nacionalnih spremljevalnih ukrepov, zlasti način, na katerega so sistem razdeljevanja svežega sadja v šolah in spremljevalne informacije o zdravi prehrani vključeni v nacionalni šolski program;
- the relevance and impact of national accompanying measures, in particular the way in which the School Fresh Fruit Scheme and accompanying information on a healthy diet are incorporated into the national curriculum;
Istočasno je populacijo otrok zajela epidemija debelosti in ocenjuje se, da je v EU 22 milijonov otrok s prekomerno telesno težo, za 5,1 milijona teh pa velja, da je njihova telesna teža hudo prekomerna.
At the same time there is an obesity epidemic among children; it is estimated that there are 22 million overweight children in the EU, 5.1 million of whom are considered to be severely overweight.
Pogosto uživanje sadja in zelenjave zmanjša tveganje za številne bolezni ter preprečuje prekomerno in hudo prekomerno težo.
A high intake of fruit and vegetables reduces the risk of a large number of diseases and prevents overweight and severe overweight.
Prehranjevalne navade se oblikujejo v otroštvu in kaže, da tisti, ki se kot otroci naučijo jesti veliko sadja in zelenjave, to počnejo tudi kot odrasli.
Eating habits are established in childhood and the indications are that children who learn to eat a lot of fruit and vegetables continue to do so as adults.
Leta 2007 se je organizacija trga za sadje in zelenjavo temeljito reformirala, postala je bolj tržno usmerjena in se tako uskladila z drugo posodobljeno skupno evropsko kmetijsko politiko.
In 2007, the organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables underwent a fundamental reform towards greater market orientation, thereby bringing the organisation into line with the rest of the modernised common European agricultural policy.
Odgovornost za preprečevanje in upravljanje kriz nosijo organizacije proizvajalcev, ni več izvoznih pomoči in pomoči za predelavo, sadje in zelenjava pa sta sedaj v celoti vključena v shemo enotnega plačila.
Responsibility for the prevention and management of crises lies with the producer organisations, export aid and aid for processing has been removed and fruit and vegetables are now fully integrated into the single payment system.
Drugače povedano: povpraševanje določa ponudbo.
In other words, it is demand which determines supply.
Z reformo organizacije trga za sadje in zelenjavo pa je bila sprejeta tudi soglasna odločitev, da se trend vse manjše porabe sadja in zelenjave obrne.
With the reform of the organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables, it was unanimously decided to reverse the falling consumption of fruit and vegetables.
Večje povpraševanje bo predvsem spodbujalo javno zdravje, vendar bo koristilo tudi evropskim kmetom, ki pridelujejo sadje in zelenjavo.
Higher demand will promote public health first and foremost but will also benefit European farmers producing fruit and vegetables.
Zdravstveni vidik je najpomembnejši razlog za uvedbo sistema razdeljevanja sadja v šolah v EU.
The health aspect is the most important reason for launching a school fruit scheme in the EU.
Zaradi prekomerne telesne teže se poveča tveganje za bolezni srca in ožilja, sladkorno bolezen, visok krvni pritisk in nekatere oblike raka.
Excessive weight entails a greater risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, high blood pressure and certain forms of cancer.
Te bolezni spadajo med glavne grožnje javnemu zdravju v EU, stroški zdravljenja pa močno bremenijo proračune za zdravstvo v državah članicah.
These diseases constitute one of the greatest threats to public health in the EU and the cost of treatment weighs heavily on the Member States’ health budgets.
Komisija v oceni učinka navaja dve izmed premaloštevilnih študij, ki naj bi osvetlile povezavo med izdatki za zdravstvo in nezadostnim uživanjem sadja in zelenjave.
In its impact assessment, the Commission refers to two of the all too few studies carried out to shed light on the link between health expenditure and too low an intake of fruit and vegetables.
S tega vidika bi bilo treba izdatke zaradi sistema razdeljevanja sadja v šolah istočasno obravnavati kot prihranke v zdravstvenih proračunih držav članic s splošno koristnim učinkom predvsem na javno zdravje pa tudi na evropsko gospodarstvo.
Seen in this light, expenditure on a school fruit scheme should be regarded as a parallel saving in the Member States’ health budgets which, overall, has a positive effect, first and foremost on public health but also on the European economy.
Dokler se ne doseže dnevni vnos 600 gramov, ki ga številni strokovnjaki priporočajo za ljudi, starejše od 11 let, bi moralo veljati: več sadja in zelenjave – večji prihranek.
Until a daily intake of 600 grams is achieved, which several experts recommend for people from age 11 upwards, the advice should be the more fruit and vegetables, the greater the savings.
Preprečevanje je cenejše kot zdravljenje.
Prevention is cheaper than treatment.
Države članice lahko sistem dopolnijo in razširijo, vendar se pomoč ne sme uporabiti namesto že obstoječih stalnih sistemov.
Member States may supplement and extend the scheme but the aid cannot be used instead of existing, permanent schemes.
Da bi uvedba sistema razdeljevanja sadja v šolah dosegla vse koristne učinke, je treba zagotoviti mnogo več sredstev.
To achieve all the positive effects of introducing a school fruit scheme, there must be a far greater allocation of funds.
En sadež na teden ne zadostuje ne za spremembo prehranjevalnih navad ne za dosego učinka na javno zdravje.
One piece of fruit a week is not sufficient either to change eating habits or to achieve an effect on public health.
Sistem razdeljevanja sadja v šolah bi moral predvidezi porcijo sadja na učenca dnevno in ne bi smel biti namenjen zgolj otrokom, starim od šest do deset let, kar predlaga Komisija.
A school fruit scheme should consist of a portion of fruit per pupil per day and not only be aimed at school children aged six to ten years, as the Commission proposes.
Da bi zajel številne že obstoječe med seboj razlikujoče se tradicije in sisteme v EU, mora biti sistem za razdeljevanje sadja in zelenjave v šolah dovolj prožen, da se lahko prilagodi lokalnim, regionalnim in nacionalnim pogojem.
In order to encompass the many different traditions and schemes already existing within the EU, a school fruit scheme must be flexible enough to be geared to local, regional and national conditions.
Prožnost bi morala veljati tudi za nacionalno sofinanciranje, pri katerem bi morala vsaka država članica sama odločati, kako se financira nacionalni prispevek (iz nacionalnih, regionalnih ali lokalnih proračunov, s plačili staršev itd).
This flexibility should also extend to national co-financing, where it is up to each individual Member State to decide how the national contribution is financed (by national, regional or local budgets, via parent payments etc.).
SADJE V ŠOLAH IN MLEKO V ŠOLAH
SCHOOL FRUIT AND SCHOOL MILK
V EU se že več kot 30 let na različne načine zagotavlja pomoč za razdeljevanje mleka šolarjem.
For more than 30 years, various forms of EU aid have been granted to distribute milk to school children.
V šolskem letu 2006–2007 se je v 22 državah članicah v šolah razdelilo 305.000 ton mleka, k čemur je EU prispevala več kot 50 milijonov EUR.
In the 2006-2007 school year, 305 000 tonnes of school milk were distributed in 22 Member States, to which the EU contributed more than EUR 50 million.
Pravila za mleko v šolah so se poenostavila, povečal se je izbor proizvodov, tako da lahko države članice same odločijo, ali bodo prednost dale mlečnim proizvodom z nizko vsebnostjo maščob, tako je sistem postal hranilen.
The rules on school milk have been simplified and the range of products has been extended so that the Member States can choose to prioritise low-fat dairy products and the scheme has thereby become nutritious.
Zaželeno je, da bi bil sistem razdeljevanja sadja v šolah podoben; v sistemu bi se lahko določila količinska omejitev na eno porcijo sadja ali zelenjave na učenca dnevno.
A corresponding system is desirable for the school fruit scheme, under which a cap on quantity of one portion of fruit or vegetable per pupil per day could be set.
Razveseljivo je, da je Komisija uporabila številne izkušnje, ki jih je pridobila s sistemom mleka za šole.
It is gratifying to see that the Commission has made use of the wide range of experience gained from the school milk scheme.
Na koncu poročevalec poziva Komisijo, naj Evropski parlament redno obvešča o seznamu proizvodov, ki so na ravni Skupnosti odobreni za vključitev v sistem razdeljevanja sadja v šolah.
In conclusion, your rapporteur would urge the Commission to keep the European Parliament informed of the list of products approved at Community level for inclusion in the school fruit scheme.
o pregledu stanja potrošniških trgov
on the Consumer Markets Scoreboard
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 29. januarja o spremljanju rezultatov za potrošnike na enotnem trgu: pregled stanja potrošniških trgov ( KOM(2008)0031 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 29 January 2008 entitled "Monitoring consumer outcomes in the single market: the Consumer Markets Scoreboard" ( COM(2008)0031 ),
– ob upoštevanju pregleda notranjega trga št. 16 a z dne 14. februarja 2008 ( SEC(2008)0076 ),
– having regard to the Internal Market Scoreboard n o 16 bis of 14 February 2008 ( SEC(2008)0076 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2008 o strategiji potrošniške politike 2007–2013
– having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2008 on EU consumer policy strategy 2007-2013
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0211 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0211 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. septembra 2008 o reviziji notranjega trga
– having regard to its resolution of 23 September 2008 on the Internal Market Scoreboard
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0421 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0421 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 20. novembra 2007 „Enotni trg za Evropo 21. stoletja“ ( KOM(2007)0724 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 20 November 2007 entitled "A single market for 21st century Europe" ( COM(2007)0724 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 20. novembra 2007 o spremljanju rezultatov za potrošnike na enotnem trgu: Storitve splošnega interesa, vključno s socialnimi storitvami splošnega interesa: nova evropska zaveza ( KOM(2007)0725 ), ki spremlja sporočilo o enotnem trgu za Evropo 21. stoletja,
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 20 November 2007 entitled "Services of general interest, including social services of general interest: a new European commitment" ( COM(2007)0725 ), accompanying the Communication on a single market for 21st century Europe,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o izvajanju nove metodologije za spremljanje proizvodnih trgov in sektorjev: rezultati prvega sektorskega pregleda ( SEC(2007)1517 ), ki spremlja sporočilo o enotnem trgu za Evropo 21. stoletja,
– having regard to the Commission Staff Working Document entitled "Implementing the new methodology for product market and sector monitoring: Results of a first sector screening" ( SEC(2007)1517 ), accompanying the Communication on a single market for 21st century Europe,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6-0392/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6-0392/2008 ),
A. ker pozdravlja objavo pregleda potrošniških trgov (“pregled”), da se bo notranji trg bolje odzival na pričakovanja in skrbi državljanov,
A. whereas it welcomes the publication of the Consumer Markets Scoreboard ("the Scoreboard"), which aims at making the Internal Market more responsive to the expectations and concerns of citizens,
B. ker so konkurenčni in uspešno delujoči potrošniški trgi bistvenega pomena za zagotovitev, da bodo državljani zaupali v notranji trg,
B. whereas competitive and effectively functioning consumer markets are crucial to ensure that citizens have confidence in the Internal Market,
C. ker je treba pregled dopolniti z drugimi načini spremljanja,
C. whereas the Scoreboard needs to be complemented by other means of monitoring,
D. ker naj bi kazalniki v pregledu pomagali pri opredelitvi sektorjev, ki jih je treba podrobno preučiti,
D. whereas the indicators in the Scoreboard are meant to help to identify sectors to be studied in further detail,
E. ker bi moral pregled spodbuditi razpravo o vprašanjih potrošniške politike,
E. whereas the Scoreboard should stimulate debate on consumer policy issues,
1. poudarja, da je treba državljanom omogočiti, da v celoti izkoristijo prednosti notranjega trga, in meni, da je ta pregled za to pomembno orodje;
Stresses the importance of enabling citizens to benefit fully from the benefits of the Internal Market, and sees the Scoreboard as an important tool to this end;
3. poudarja, da je pregled še v povojih in ga je treba nadalje razviti s podrobnejšimi podatki, natančno statistiko in dodatnimi analizami na podlagi različnih kazalnikov;
Welcomes the five main indicators in the Scoreboard in relation to complaints, price levels, satisfaction, switching and safety;
Oblikovanje kazalnikov
Developing the indicators
10. poziva Komisijo, naj s sodnimi in izvensodnimi pravnimi sredstvi in z nacionalnimi pravnimi mehanizmi oblikuje kazalnike glede čezmejnih sodnih postopkov in odškodnin za škodo, ki so jo utrpeli potrošniki;
Calls on the Commission to develop indicators relating to cross-border judicial proceedings and compensation for damage suffered by consumers, through judicial and extrajudicial means of redress, as well as through existing national redress mechanisms;
13. pozdravlja prizadevanja za razvoj bolj izpopolnjenih kazalnikov cen, a tudi poziva k uporabi drugih kazalnikov glede uspešnega delovanja trgov, preden bodo opredeljena posebna politična priporočila;
Welcomes efforts to develop more sophisticated price indicators, but also calls for the use of other indicators relating to the effective functioning of markets before making specific policy recommendations;
Izboljšanje baze podatkov
Improving the information base
18. poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj z državami članicami za evropske informacijske centre za potrošnike zagotovijo več sredstev in ustrezno število zaposlenih, da bodo uspešno reševali vse večje število čezmejnih pritožb potrošnikov in skrajšali čas za obravnavo teh pritožb;
Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to ensure that European consumer information centres are given greater resources and are properly staffed in order both efficiently to solve the increasing number of consumer cross-border complaints and to shorten handling times for such complaints;
Večja ozaveščenost
Increased awareness
Odnosi pri pregledu notranjega trga
Relation ship with the Internal Market Scoreboard
Notranji trg se pogosto omenja kot jedro evropskega povezovanja, a za številne potrošnike je le nejasen izraz.
The internal market is often referred to as the core of European integration, but to many consumers it is no more than a vague expression.