natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
15. poziva Komisijo, naj od držav članic zahteva, da v svojih letnih poročilih o izvajanju Direktive 2000/43/ES analizirajo učinkovitost protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje v boju proti vzorcem sistematičnega ločevanja manjšin in žensk, zlasti v izobraževalnem sektorju in pri dostopu na trg dela, do zdravstvenega varstva ter blaga in storitev, ter da vključijo tudi možnost enakosti spolov v poročila kot način za odpravljanje večkratne diskriminacije, s katero se mnogi srečujejo;
Calls on the Commission to request the Member States, in their annual reports on the implementation of Directive 2000/43/EC, to analyse the effectiveness of anti-discrimination legislation in combating patterns of systematic segregation of minorities and women, particularly in the education sector and as regards access to the labour market, healthcare and goods and services, and further to incorporate a gender equality perspective into the reports as a way of alleviating the multiple discrimination faced by many;
22. poudarja, da člen 10 Direktive državam članicam nalaga obveznost, da javnost obveščajo o ustreznih določbah direktive z vsemi primernimi sredstvi;
Recalls that Article 10 of the Directive imposes an obligation on Member States to disseminate information to the public on the relevant provisions of the Directive by all appropriate means;
24. opozarja države članice, da je njihova dolžnost pomembne informacije posredovati državljanom ter spodbujati in podpirati kampanje za osveščanje o obstoječi zakonodaji in organih, vključenih v boj proti diskriminaciji;
Reminds Member States of their obligation to disseminate relevant information to citizens and to encourage and support awareness-raising campaigns about existing national legislation and bodies involved in the fight against discrimination;
27. meni, da je usposabljanje uradnikov v zvezi s cilji in določbami direktive izjemno pomembno z vidika njihove odgovornosti za izvajanje direktive znotraj družbe kot celote in zato, da se znotraj samih vladnih organov odpravijo vsa tveganja institucionalnega rasizma; poziva države članice, da vlagajo v tako usposabljanje, in spodbuja države članice in Komisijo, da pripravijo evropske programe za izmenjavo med različnimi nacionalnimi vladnimi organi;
Firmly believes that it is vitally important that officials receive training on the subject of the aims and provisions of the Directive, in view of their responsibility for implementation of the Directive within society as a whole and in order to remove all risks of institutional racism within government bodies themselves; calls on the Member States to invest in such training and encourages them and the Commission to set up European programmes for exchanges between the various national government bodies;
32. priporoča, da Komisija pozorno spremlja neodvisno delovanje organov za spodbujanje enakosti, pri čemer se lahko sklicuje na načela, povezana s statusom nacionalnih institucij (pariška načela), iz resolucije Generalne skupščine ZN št. 48/134 z dne 20. decembra 1993, ki vključuje načela o ustreznem financiranju takih organov
Recommends that the Commission carefully monitor the independent functioning of equality bodies, for which purpose it can use as a reference the Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions ('the Paris Principles') as adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 48/134 of 20 December 1993 , which include principles on the adequate financing of such bodies
36. priporoča, da države članice svojim organom za spodbujanje enakosti zagotovijo dovolj osebja in zadostna finančna sredstva, da lahko uspešno izvajajo svojo pomembno nalogo, vključno z zagotavljanjem ustrezne pomoči žrtvam diskriminacije; meni, da je tem organom tudi treba podeliti potrebna pooblastila za preiskovanje primerov;
Recommends that the Member States provide their equality bodies with sufficient human and financial resources to enable them to perform their important role effectively, including the provision of appropriate assistance to victims of discrimination; considers that such bodies should also be given the necessary powers to investigate cases;
38. poudarja, da je treba žrtvam diskriminacije v pravnih postopkih pomagati, ter opozarja, da lahko organizacije, ki so ali niso zakonsko določene, v tem smislu zelo pomagajo žrtvam;
Stresses that victims of discrimination should be assisted in legal proceedings and recalls that statutory and non-statutory organisations in this respect can be of real help to victims;
45. poziva Komisijo, naj izvede študijo, v kateri naj preveri, katere države članice imajo določbe o pozitivnih ukrepih, kateri preskusi morajo biti izpolnjeni, kako vladni ali nevladni organi te določbe uporabljajo v praksi in kako uspešne so;
Calls on the Commission to conduct a study examining which Member States have positive action provisions, what the tests are that must be satisfied, how these provisions have been applied in practice by government or non-government bodies, and how effective they have been;
50. pozdravlja zanimanje Komisije za vprašanje večvrstne diskriminacije in začetek študije na to temo; poziva jo, naj sprejme širok koncept večvrstne diskriminacije, v katerem bo lahko upoštevana možnost, da so lahko posamezniki hkrati izpostavljeni diskriminaciji na podlagi več dejavnikov;
Welcomes the Commission's interest in the issue of multiple discrimination, including the launching of a study on this subject; calls on the Commission to adopt a broad concept of multiple discrimination capable of taking into account the possibility of individuals being at risk of discrimination on several grounds at once;
53. poziva institucije EU, da položaj etničnih manjšin, zlasti žensk in mladoletnikov, v državah prosilkah še naprej uporabljajo kot merilo za ocenjevanje pripravljenosti za pristop k Evropski uniji;
Urges the EU institutions to continue to use the situation of ethnic minorities, particularly women and minors, in applicant countries as a criterion for the purpose of assessing preparedness for accession to the European Union;
Direktiva 2000/78/ES z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnem okviru enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu. in direktivo o rasni enakosti
Directive 2000/78 of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. and the so-called Racial Equality Directive
Direktiva 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost. .
Directive 2000/43 of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. .
Slednjo so morale države članice v svoj pravni red prenesti do 19. julija 2003.
The latter Directive had to be implemented by the Member States before the 19th of July 2003.
V poročilu Evropske komisije
The report of the European Commission
KOM(2006) 643 konč./2, 15.12.2006. je podana analiza izvajanja direktive o enakem obravnavanju oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost.
COM(2006) 643 final/2 of 15 December 2006. provides an analysis of the implementation of the Directive for equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin.
Evropska komisija naj bi v tem letu objavila tudi informacije o morebitnih postopkih za ugotavljanje kršitev.
At a later stage this year, the European Commission is likely to provide information on possible infringement procedures.
Po mnenju poročevalke predstavlja direktiva o rasni enakosti (2000/43/ES) pomemben del zakonodaje.
The Rapporteur is of the opinion that the Racial Equality Directive (2000/43/EC) forms an important piece of legislation.
Z njenim sprejetjem je bil storjen velik korak naprej pri varstvu pred diskriminacijo in zagotavljanju boljših možnosti za odškodnino.
It was a major step forward in protecting people against discrimination and giving them possibilities for redress.
Prav tako pomembno je, da velja direktiva za vse osebe, ne glede na državljanstvo ali stalno prebivališče.
Also important is the fact that the Directive applies to all persons, regardless of citizenship or residence status.
Za pravilen prenos direktiv je potrebno še veliko dela.
There is still much work to be done for a correct implementation of the Directive.
Poročevalka poziva Komisijo, naj poleg pravilnega pravnega prenosa preuči tudi ovire, ki se pojavljajo v praksi.
The Rapporteur calls on the Commission to not only look into the correct legal transposition of the Directives, but also to consider the obstacles on the ground.
Veliko ljudi se ne zaveda svojih pravic ali pa se jim zdi težko vložiti pritožbo.
Many people are unaware of their rights or find it difficult to pursue a claim.
Prednost je treba dati obveščanju o protidiskriminacijskih zakonih in uveljavljanju pravice do odškodnine.
Information about the anti-discrimination laws and access to the right of redress should get more priority.
Kljub napredku pri prenosu protidiskriminacijskih direktiv se rasizem ni zmanjšal.
Within the European Union, the amount of registered racial acts has dramatically increased.
Nasprotno, v Evropski uniji je število zabeleženih rasističnih dejanj strmo naraslo, poleg tega pa se dokazano povečuje strpnost do diskriminacijskega vedenja, zlasti zoper priseljence in muslimane.
This is accompanied by evidence of increased tolerance for discriminatory behaviour particularly against immigrants and Muslims.
Rasizem je v nasprotju z načeli Evropske unije.
Racism is contrary to the principles of the European Union.
Slabi socialno kohezijo in ovira emancipacijo ljudi.
It undermines social cohesion and hampers emancipation of people.
Pomembno je, da Evropski parlament da zagon za okrepitev politične volje v boju proti rasizmu.
It is important that the European Parliament gives an impetus to increase the political will to address racism.
Da bi ocenila prenos direktive, je poročevalka preučila področje njene uporabe, pravna sredstva, dokazno breme, organe za spodbujanje enakosti, širjenje informacij in ozaveščanje.
For the implementation of the Directive, the Rapporteur has looked into scope, legal redress, burden of proof, the equality bodies, dissemination of information and awareness.
Direktiva o rasni enakosti je bila v času svojega sprejetja revolucionarna, saj varstva pred diskriminacijo ni omejila le na področje zaposlovanja.
The Racial Equality Directive was revolutionary at the time of its adoption, because it did not limit the protection against discrimination to the area of employment.
Člen 3 med pomembna področja uporabe zajema socialno varnost, izobraževanje ter dostop do blaga in storitev, vključno s stanovanji.
Article 3 includes in the material scope amongst others social security, education and the access to goods and services, including housing.
Široko področje uporabe Direktive 2000/43/ES pa ne velja za direktivo o enakosti pri zaposlovanju (2000/78/ES), ki prepoveduje diskriminacijo na podlagi vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti, vendar le na področju zaposlovanja in dela.
The broad scope of Directive 2000/43/EC was not mirrored in the Employment Directive (2000/78/EC), which prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, but only in the area of employment and occupation.
Poročevalka pozdravlja dejstvo, da so številne države članice široko področje uporabe direktive o rasni enakosti sprejele za vse oblike diskriminacije in s tem presegle direktivo.
The Rapporteur welcomes the fact that a number of Member States have adopted the broad scope of the Racial Equality Directive for all grounds of discrimination, thereby going beyond the Directive.
Po njenem mnenju da bi morali direktivo o enakosti pri zaposlovanju spremeniti in jo razširiti na enako področje uporabe, kot velja za direktivo o rasni enakosti.
The Rapporteur is of the opinion that the Employment Directive should be amended, to have the same scope as the Racial Equality Directive.
To je potrebno, da se preprečijo nastanek hierarhije med oblikami diskriminacije in težave v primeru večkratne diskriminacije.
This is necessary in order not to create a hierarchy in forms of discrimination and also to avoid problems in case of multiple discrimination.
Morda bi bilo treba področje uporabe direktive, glede na to, da se rasizem prepleta z diskriminacijo na podlagi narodnosti in/ali vere ali prepričanja, prilagoditi, da bi s tem povečali dostop do učinkovitih pravnih sredstev.
Moreover, since racism is interlinked with discrimination on the grounds of nationality and/or religion or belief, adjustment of the scope of the Directive might be necessary to increase access to effective redress.
Medtem ko večina držav članic upošteva pomembna področja uporabe direktive o rasni enakosti, je treba omeniti nekaj opaznejših pomanjkljivosti.
While most countries seem to meet the material scope of the Racial Equality Directive, there are still some significant gaps that need to be addressed.
Pet držav članic, na primer, še vedno ni ustrezno preneslo direktive na ostala področja poleg zaposlovanja.
Five Member States, for example, still have to adequately transpose the Directive in the fields outside employment.
Malta, Latvija, Estonija, Poljska, Češka republika.
Malta, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Czech Republic.
V nekaterih državah članicah je bil prenos omejen na zasebni sektor.
Moreover, in some Member States the transposition has been limited to the private sector.
V dveh državah je vojaška zvrst izvzeta s področja prenesene zakonodaje.
In two countries military service is excluded from the scope of transposing legislation.
Številne države članice javnega sektorja niso ustrezno zajele v področje uporabe direktive, ena država članica pa je njeno uporabo omejila v zasebnem sektorju.
While the public sector is not adequately covered in many Member States, one Member State has limited the application of the Directive in the private sector.
Ker vsi zasebni in javni organi sodijo v pomembno področje uporabe direktive, je treba ugotoviti, zakaj so bili nekateri sektorji izvzeti.
Since all public and private bodies fall within the material scope of the Directive, it is necessary to find out why certain sectors have been left out.
Poročevalka prav tako želi od Komisije izvedeti, ali direktiva zajema tudi dejavnosti policijskih organov v državah članicah, kot je etnično profiliranje.
The Rapporteur also wants to hear from the Commission if the Directive also covers activities of the police authorities in the Member States, such as ethnic profiling.
Vse države kombinirajo sodne postopke z nesodnimi.
All states combine judicial proceedings with non judicial proceedings.
To je pomembno, ker dokazno breme v sodnih postopkih ni le na strani žrtve in ker le-ta za vložitev tožbe ni odvisna od državnega tožilca.
This is important because in civil proceedings the burden of proof is not only on the side of the victim, and because he or she is not dependent on the state prosecutor to file a complaint.
Na splošno v sodni praksi ni veliko zadev, povezanih z diskriminacijo.
Generally speaking there is a low number of case law on discrimination.
Čeprav bi na podlagi tega lahko sklepali, da rasizem ni preveč pereč problem, raziskave kažejo drugače.
Some might conclude that racism is not too big a problem, but research shows otherwise.
Verjetneje je, da je na poti do pravice še vedno veliko preprek.
A more realistic argument is that there are still many barriers to justice.
Dolžina in zapletenost postopkov lahko žrtve odvrneta od ukrepanja.
The length and complexity of the procedures may act as deterrent to victims.
Na Portugalskem in v Sloveniji, na primer, lahko nekateri sodni postopki trajajo pet let ali več.
as is the case in Portugal and in Slovenia there are concerns that some judicial proceedings may take five years or more.
Nasprotno je rok za vložitev pritožbe včasih prekratek.
On the contrary when it comes to filing a complaint the time is sometimes too short.
Na Madžarskem, na primer, imajo žrtve za predložitev svoje zadeve le 30 dni, na Nizozemskem in Irskem pa 2 meseca.
For example, victims have only 30 days in Hungary or 2 months in the Netherlands and Ireland to bring their case forward.
V več državah članicah lahko resnično oviro predstavljajo nezadostna finančna sredstva za sprožitev postopka.
In a number of Member States insufficient financial means to pursue a case may be a real obstacle.
V Češki republiki, Litvi in na Slovaškem.
i.e. in the Czech Republic, Lithuania and Slovakia.
Asociacije so lahko žrtvam v veliko pomoč.
Associations can be of real help to victims.
Kljub temu številne države članice nimajo posebnih predpisov o uporabi asociacij v postopkih za ugotavljanje diskriminacije.
However, many Member States do not foresee special rules on the engagement of associations in discrimination proceedings.
Danska, Finska, Litva, Švedska ali Združeno kraljestvo.
i.e. Denmark, Finland, Lithuania, Sweden or the UK.
Le nekaj držav dopušča uporabo asociacij med postopkom „v prid žrtvam“ diskriminacije.
Few States allow associations to engage in proceedings 'on behalf of' victims of discrimination.
Najdejo se tudi pozitivni zgledi, na primer Španija ali Latvija, kjer lahko pravne osebe, zakonsko pooblaščene za varovanje legitimnih kolektivnih pravic in interesov, s privoljenjem pritožnika sodelujejo v sodnih postopkih, da se zagotovi spoštovanje načela enake obravnave na podlagi rasnega ali etničnega izvora.
There are some positive examples like in Spain or Latvia where legal entities legally authorised to defend legitimate collective rights and interests may engage on behalf of the complainant, with his or her approval, in any judicial procedure in order to give effect to the principle on equal treatment based on racial or ethnic origin.
Kršitvam protidiskriminacijskih zakonov morajo slediti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne sankcije.
Infringement of anti-discrimination laws must be met with effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
Doslej je to storilo le malo držav članic.
Yet at this stage few countries are considered to have appropriate sanctions in place.
Dokazati diskriminacijo je zelo težko.
Proving discrimination is notoriously difficult.
Zlasti na področju zaposlovanja ima delodajalec veliko močnejši položaj kot delojemalec, saj običajno razpolaga z informacijami o domnevni diskriminatorni odločitvi, priče pa pogosto nerade pričajo zoper njih.
Particularly in the employment sector the employer has a much stronger position than the employee, because information concerning the allegedly discriminatory decision is usually held by the employer and witnesses are often reluctant to testify against their employer.
Iz tega razloga člen 8 določa tako imenovani dvostopenjski test.
For this reason, article 8 provides for a so-called two-staged test.
Na prvi stopnji morajo osebe, ki menijo, da so bile diskriminirane, navesti dejstva , na podlagi katerih je mogoče sklepati , da je prišlo do neposredne ali posredne diskriminacije.
Stage one requires persons who consider themselves to have been discriminated to establish facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination.
Dokazno breme se nato preloži na obtoženega, ki mora dokazati , da kršitve načela enake obravnave ni bilo.
The burden of proof will then shift to the respondent to prove that there has been no breach of the principle of equal treatment.
To ne velja za kazenske zadeve.
This does not apply to criminal cases.
Več držav članic še ni (ustrezno) preneslo določbe o dokaznem bremenu.
Several Member States have not (adequately) transposed the provision on the burden of proof.
Poleg tega je v marsikateri državi članici učinek določb o dokaznem bremenu po prenosu še vedno nepreverjen zaradi pomanjkanja sodne prakse na tem področju.
Moreover, in many Member States the burden of proof provisions following transposition remain untested due to lack of case law.
Prvi rezultati iz sodne prakse kažejo, da je celo dokaz zadeve prima facie za pritožnike težko premostljiva ovira.
The first indications from the case law appear to suggest that even proof of a prima facie case remains a difficult obstacle for claimants to overcome.
Statistične podatke je težko dobiti, situacijski testi pa morajo pogosto izpolnjevati stroge pogoje.
Statistics are difficult to obtain and situation tests often have to comply with strict conditions.
Zbiranje občutljivih podatkov, s pomočjo katerih bi lahko ugotovili posredno diskriminacijo ali ocenili obseg diskriminacije v družbi, še vedno povzroča zaskrbljenost in strah v številnih državah članicah.
The collecting of sensitive data, which could be necessary to establish indirect discrimination or to assess the extent of discrimination in society, continues to raise concerns and fears in many Member States.
Skoraj vse države članice
Almost all Member States
Izjeme so Češka republika, Luksemburg, Malta in Nemčija. imajo organe za spodbujanje enakosti ali pa so naloge, ki naj bi jih izvajali takšni organi, dodelile obstoječim organom, npr. nacionalnemu inštitutu za človekove pravice.
The exceptions are the Czech Republic, Luxembourg, Malta and Germany. now have equality bodies or have given the functions to be carried out by such bodies to an existing body such as a national human rights institute.
V glavnem so ti organi pristojni ne le za diskriminacijo na podlagi rase in narodnosti, marveč tudi na podlagi drugih razlogov.
A high proportion of the bodies are competent not only for discrimination based on racial and ethnic origin but also on other grounds.
Žrtvam diskriminacije nudijo pomoč na različne načine, na primer s sprožitvijo pravnega postopka
The respective bodies provide assistance to victims of discriminations in a variety of ways, like in taking legal action
Finski, belgijski, madžarski, irski, britanski in švedski organi. ali z nezavezujočimi mnenji o pritožbah, ki jim bile predložene
i.e. the Finnish, Belgian, Hungarian, Irish, British and Swedish bodies. or by means of giving non-binding opinions on complaints submitted to them
Velja za Avstrijo, Nizozemsko, Dansko, Ciper, Madžarsko, Latvijo, Litvo, Grčijo in Slovenijo. .
This is the situation in Austria, The Netherlands, Danmark, Cyprus, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Greece and Slovenia. .
Številni specializirani organi lahko raziščejo pritožbe o diskriminaciji in običajno sprejmejo odločitev, s katero se strinjajo vse vpletene osebe.
A number of specialised bodies can investigate complaints of discrimination and usually can force compliance with their findings by all persons involved.
V Avstriji, na Cipru, Madžarskem, Irskem, v Litvi in na Švedskem.
i.e. in Austria, Cyprus, France, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania and Sweden.
Še vedno ni jasno, ali bodo ti organi svojo funkcijo lahko opravljali neodvisno, kot to zahteva direktiva.
It remains to be seen whether all bodies will be able to carry out their functions independently as required by the Directive.
Glej poročilo „Oblikovanje protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje v Evropi - primerjava 25 držav članic“ Evropske mreže neodvisnih strokovnjakov za diskriminacijo iz novembra 2006.
See report 'developing anti-discrimination law in Europe' the 25 Member States compared, European Network of Independent Experts in the non-discrimination field, November 2006.
Tako v Italiji kot v Španiji, na primer, se organi za spodbujanje enake obravnave nahajajo znotraj ministrstev.
For instance both in Italy and in Spain the equality bodies are located within ministries.
V nekaterih državah ti organi nimajo zadostnih finančnih sredstev za opravljanje svojih funkcij.
In some countries the bodies have insufficient financial means to carry out their functions.
Razširjanje informacij in ozaveščanje
Dissemination of information and awareness raising
Pravice ljudem navadno ne koristijo, če se jih ti ne zavedajo.
Rights are generally of little use if people are unaware of them.
Člen 10 direktive zato državam članicam nalaga obveznost, da javnost obveščajo o ustreznih določbah direktive z vsemi primernimi sredstvi.
Therefore, Article 10 of the Directive imposes an obligation on Member States to disseminate information to the public on the relevant provisions of the Directive by all appropriate means.