natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Obstoječa splošna pravila o varstvu osebnih podatkov, obdelanih v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, so dopolnjena s pravili, ki jih določa ta instrument , še posebej s temeljnimi načeli, določenimi iz člena 9 .
Existing general rules on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters are complemented by the rules established in this instrument , in particular the basic principles set out in Article 9 .
Okvirni sklep o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah (ki bi se moral kot splošne smernice uporabljati tudi pri tem aktu), še ni sprejet.
The Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (which should also apply to this act as a general guideline) is still awaiting adoption.
Zato bi bilo treba omeniti splošna načela varovanja podatkov, katere bi bilo treba upoštevati pri vsakem zbiranju, obdelovanju in posredovanju podatkov v okviru tega okvirnega sklepa.
For this reason, mention should be made of a general set of data-protection principles which should be observed whenever data are being gathered, processed and transmitted under this Framework Decision.
(10a) V zvezi s tem je najbolj pomembno sprejeti okvirni sklep o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, s katerim bo zagotovljena ustrezna raven varstva podatkov in bo vključeval obdelavo osebnih podatkov na nacionalni ravni.
(10a) In this context the adoption of the framework decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of p o lice and judicial cooperation in criminal matters is of paramount importance in order to provide for an adequate level of data protection, including for the processing of personal data at national level.
(12a) Zagotoviti je treba vednost o obstoju obsodb in iz njih izhajajočih prepovedi, pa tudi o kraju, kjer so bile izrečene in zabeležene, da se zagotovi, da so izpiski iz kazenskih evidenc razumljivi.
(12a) Knowledge concerning the existence of convictions and of the prohibitions arising therefrom, and also concerning the place in which these were handed down and recorded, must be provided in order to ensure that extracts from criminal records are easy to understand.
Zato morajo države članice uvesti primerljivo obliko izpiskov obsodb, v katerih se oblikuje poseben del, namenjen spolnim deliktom.
Hence the Member States must establish comparable formats for extracts containing convictions, with a special section to be created for convictions relating to sexual offences.
Zagotoviti je treba, da so kazenske evidence lahko razumljive in da se podatki, ki jih vsebujejo, ustrezno uporabljajo.
It must be ensured that extracts from criminal records are easy to understand and that the information contained in them is put to proper use.
Ta cilj je mogoče doseči z oblikovanjem skupin, v katere se skupaj uvrstijo različne vrste obsodb: na primer obsodbe zaradi kaznivih dejanj proti lastnini, obsodbe zaradi kaznivih dejanj proti drugim osebam, obsodbe zaradi spolnih deliktov in tako naprej.
That objective may be achieved if the various types of conviction are grouped together: for example, convictions for offences against property, convictions for offences against other persons, convictions for sexual offences, and so on.
Oblikovanje skupin po vrsti obsodbe bi omogočilo, da se takoj prepoznajo osebe, obsojene zaradi spolnih deliktov.
Grouping by type of conviction would ensure that persons convicted for sexual offences are immediately identifiable.
Kakršna koli sprememba ali izbris podatkov, poslanih v skladu s členom 4(4), povzroči enako spremembo ali izbris s strani države članice državljanstva v zvezi s podatki, shranjenimi v skladu z odstavkom 1 za namene nadaljnjega pošiljanja v skladu s členom 7 .
Any alteration or deletion of information transmitted in accordance with Article 4(4) shall entail identical alteration or deletions by the Member State of the person's nationality regarding information stored in accordance with paragraph 1 for the purpose of retransmission in accordance with Article 7 .
Kakršna koli sprememba ali izbris podatkov, poslanih v skladu s členom 4(4), povzroči enako spremembo ali izbris s strani države članice državljanstva v zvezi s podatki, shranjenimi v skladu z odstavkom 1.
Any alteration or deletion of information transmitted in accordance with Article 4(4) shall entail identical alteration or deletions by the Member State of the person's nationality regarding information stored in accordance with paragraph 1.
Zadnji del predlaganega člena uvaja dvojni sistem, kar zadeva obsodbe, izrečene v državi članici, ki ni država članica, katere državljanstvo ima obsojena oseba (en sistem naj bi se uporabljal na nacionalni ravni, drugi sistem pa bi se uporabljal v drugih državah članicah, ki zahtevajo podatke in niso države članice državljanstva).
The final part of the proposed article introduces a dual system as regards convictions handed down in a Member State other than the Member State of which the convicted person is a national (one system for domestic use and the other for requesting Member States other than the Member State of nationality).
S tovrstnim dvojnim sistemom bo postala naloga posredovanja podatkov samo še bolj zapletena in begajoča.
This dual system will only make the task of transmitting information more complex and more confusing.
Člen 5 – odstavek 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Za namen nadaljnjega pošiljanja v skladu s členom 7 lahko država članica državljanstva uporablja samo podatke, ki so posodobljeni v skladu z odstavkom 2.
For the purpose of retransmission in accordance with Article 7 the Member State of the person's nationality may only use information which has been updated in accordance with paragraph 2.
Država članica državljanstva lahko uporablja samo podatke, ki so posodobljeni v skladu z odstavkom 2.
The Member State of the person's nationality may only use information which has been updated in accordance with paragraph 2.
Ko se podatki iz kazenske evidence države državljanstva zahtevajo za drugo uporabo kot za kazenski postopek, mora država članica, ki zahteva podatke, navesti razlog za svoje zahteve.
Where information is requested from the register of criminal records in the Member State of the person's nationality for any purpose outside the framework of criminal proceedings, the requesting Member State shall specify its reasons for requesting it.
Ta predlog spremembe je v skladu z besedilom člena 9(2) predloga in odraža potrebo po določitvi posebnih primerov, ko se podatke lahko posreduje na podlagi zakonodaje države obsodbe ali države državljanstva, odvisno od primera, za uporabo zunaj kazenskega postopka.
This amendment is in line with the wording of Article 9(2) of the proposal and corresponds to the need to define the specific cases in which such information may be transmitted under the law of the convicting Member State or that of the person's nationality, according to the circumstances, in order to be used outside the framework of a criminal procedure.
Kadar oseba zahteva podatke o svoji lastni kazenski evidenci, osrednji organ države članice, v kateri se ta zahtevek vloži, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pošlje zahtevek za izpis iz kazenske evidence in za podatke o kazenski evidenci osrednjemu organu druge države članice, če zadevna oseba je ali je bila prebivalec ali državljan države članice prosilke ali zaprošene države članice.
When a person asks for information on his or her own criminal record, the central authority of the Member State in which the request is made shall , in accordance with national law, submit a request to the central authority of another Member State for information and related data to be extracted from the criminal record, provided the interested party is or has been a resident or a national of the requesting or requested Member State.
V primerih, ko oseba prebiva oziroma je prebivala v drugi državi članici ali ima oziroma je imela državljanstvo druge države članice, zahteva po posredovanju podatkov ne more biti odvisna od dobre volje države, kateri je bila zahteva posredovana.
In cases in which the interested party is or has been a resident or a national of another Member State and proof exists to that effect, a request for information from that other State cannot depend upon the goodwill of the State in which the request has been submitted.
Člen 9 – odstavek -1 (novo)
Article 9 – paragraph -1 (new)
Pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov za namene tega okvirnega sklepa se spoštujejo vsaj naslednja osnovna načela:
The processing of personal data for the purposes of this Framework Decision shall comply with at least the following basic principles:
(a) obdelava podatkov mora biti zakonsko dovoljena ter potrebna za namene zbiranja in/ali nadaljnje obdelave in sorazmerna z njimi;
(a) data processing shall be permitted by law, and shall be necessary and proportionate to the purposes of collection and/or further processing;
(b) podatki se zbirajo le za posebne in legitimne namene ter se nadalje obdelajo na način, ki je skladen s temi nameni;
(b) data shall be collected only for specified and legitimate purposes and further processed in a way compatible with those purposes;
(c) podatki so točni in posodobljeni;
(c) data shall be accurate and up-to-date;
Enaka obrazložitev kot pri predlogu spremembe 3.
Same justification as for Amendment 3.
Člen 9 – odstavek -1 a (novo)
Article 9 – paragraph -1 a (new)
Obdelava osebnih podatkov, ki razkrivajo rasno ali narodnostno poreklo, politične nazore, verska ali filozofska prepričanja, članstvo v sindikatu, ter podatkov v zvezi z zdravstvenim stanjem ali spolnim življenjem je prepovedana.
The processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, party or trade union membership and data concerning health or sex life shall be prohibited.
Izjemoma se lahko obdelavo takšnih podatkov izvaja, če poleg načel iz odstavka -1:
By way of exception, the processing of such data may be carried out if, in addition to the principles laid down in paragraph -1:
(a) obdelavo določa zakon, po predhodni odobritvi s strani pristojnega pravosodnega organa in za vsak primer posebej, ter je nujno potrebna za namen posameznega primera; in
(a) the processing is provided for by law, following prior authorisation by a competent judicial authority, on a case-by-case basis and is absolutely necessary for the purpose of a specific case; and
(b) države članice zagotovijo ustrezne posebne zaščitne ukrepe, na primer dostop do zadevnih podatkov, le za osebje, ki je odgovorno za izpolnitev zakonite naloge, ki upravičuje obdelavo.
(b) the Member States provide for suitable specific safeguards, for example access to the data concerned only for personnel who are responsible for the performance of the legitimate task that justifies the processing.
Osebne podatke, poslane v skladu s členom 7(1) in (4) za uporabo v kazenskem postopku, lahko država članica prosilka uporabi samo v kazenskem postopku, za katerega jih je v skladu z obrazcem iz priloge zahtevala.
Personal data provided under Article 7(1) and (4) for the purposes of criminal proceedings may be used by the requesting Member State , solely for the purposes of the particular proceedings they were requested for, in accordance with the annexed form.
Osebne podatke, poslane v skladu s členom 7(1) in (4) za uporabo v kazenskem postopku, lahko država članica prosilka uporabi v skladu z načeli iz odstavka -1 ter izključno v kazenskem postopku, za katerega jih je v skladu z obrazcem iz priloge zahtevala.
Personal data provided under Article 7(1) and (4) for the purposes of criminal proceedings may be used by the requesting Member State in accordance with the principles referred to in paragraph -1 and exclusively for the purposes of the particular proceedings they were requested for, in accordance with the annexed form.
Osebne podatke, poslane v skladu s členom 7(2) in (4) v druge namene kot za kazenski postopek, lahko država članica prosilka v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom uporabi samo za namen, za katerega jih je zahtevala, in v obsegu, ki ga je v ustreznem obrazcu določila zaprošena država članica.
Personal data provided under Article 7(2) and (4) for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings may be used by the requesting Member State, in accordance with its national law , solely for the purposes of the particular proceedings they were requested for and within the limits set out by the requested Member State in the relevant form.
Osebne podatke, poslane v skladu s členom 7(2) in (4) v druge namene kot za kazenski postopek, lahko država članica prosilka uporabi v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom in načeli iz odstavka -1 ter izključno za namen, za katerega jih je zahtevala, in v obsegu, ki ga je v ustreznem obrazcu določila zaprošena država članica.
Personal data provided under Article 7(2) and (4) for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings may be used by the requesting Member State, in accordance with its national law and with the principles referred to in paragraph -1 and exclusively for the purposes of the particular proceedings they were requested for and within the limits set out by the requested Member State in the relevant form.
Ne glede na odstavka 1 in 2 lahko država članica prosilka uporabi osebne podatke, poslane v skladu s členom 7(1), (2) in (4), za preprečitev neposredne in resne nevarnosti za javno varnost.
Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, personal data provided under Article 7(1), (2) and (4) may be used by the requesting Member State for preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security.
Ne glede na odstavka 1 in 2 lahko država članica prosilka uporabi osebne podatke, poslane v skladu s členom 7(1), (2) in (4), če je potrebno in sorazmerno z namenom preprečitve neposredne in resne nevarnosti za javno varnost ; v tem primeru država članica prosilka zaprošeni državi članici naknadno zagotovi obvestilo o izpolnjevanju pogojev potrebe, sorazmernosti, nujnosti in resnosti grožnje .
Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, personal data provided under Article 7(1), (2) and (4) may be used by the requesting Member State if such use is necessary and proportionate for the purpose of preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security; in such a case, the requesting Member State shall provide the requested Member State with an ex post notification setting out the fulfilment of the conditions of necessity, proportionality, urgency and seriousness of the threat .
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da za osebne podatke, ki so jih prejele od druge države članice na podlagi člena 4, v primeru pošiljanja tretji državi v skladu s členom 7(3) veljajo iste omejitve glede uporabe kot za državo članico prosilko v skladu z odstavkom 2 tega člena.
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that personal data received from another Member State under Article 4, if transmitted to a third State in accordance with Article 7 paragraph 3, are subject to the same usage restrictions as those applicable in a requesting Member State according to paragraphs 2 of this Article.
Države članice določijo, da v primeru, če se osebni podatki pošljejo tretji državi za namen kazenskega postopka, lahko slednja te podatke uporabi le za namen kazenskega postopka.
Member States shall specify that personal data, if transmitted to a third State for the purpose of a criminal proceeding, may be further used by that State only for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Poleg tega države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da za osebne podatke, ki so jih prejele od druge države članice na podlagi člena 4, v primeru pošiljanja tretji državi v skladu s členom 7(3) veljajo iste omejitve glede uporabe kot za državo članico prosilko v skladu z odstavkom 2 tega člena.
In addition, Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that personal data received from another Member State under Article 4, if transmitted to a third State in accordance with Article 7 paragraph 3, are subject to the same usage restrictions as those applicable in a requesting Member State according to paragraphs 2 of this Article.
Ta člen ne velja za osebne podatke, ki jih država članica pridobi v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom in ki izvirajo iz te države članice.
This article does not apply to personal data obtained by a Member State under this Framework Decision and originating from that Member State.
Odstavki od 1 do 4 ne veljajo za osebne podatke, ki jih država članica pridobi v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom in ki izvirajo iz te države članice.
Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall not apply to personal data obtained by a Member State under this Framework Decision and originating from that Member State.
Člen 9 – odstavek 5 a (novo)
Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Države članice zagotovijo, da se nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov sistematično obveščajo o izmenjavi osebnih podatkov na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa in zlasti o uporabi osebnih podatkov v okoliščinah iz člena 9(3).
Each Member State shall ensure that its national data protection authorities are systematically informed of the exchange of personal data under this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the use of personal data in the circumstances referred to in Article 9(3).
Nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov držav članic spremljajo izmenjave iz odstavka 1 in v ta namen sodelujejo drug z drugim.
The Member States' data protection authorities shall monitor the exchange referred to in paragraph 1 and cooperate with one another for that purpose.
Oseba, na katero se podatki nanašajo, se obvešča o obdelavi njenih osebnih podatkov.
A data subject shall be informed of the fact that personal data concerning him or her are being processed.
Oseba, na katero se podatki nanašajo, ima pravico, da brez nepotrebne zamude pridobi informacije o podatkih, ki so v obdelavi, v jeziku, ki ga razume, ter da popravi in, kadar je primerno, izbriše podatke, ki so bili obdelani ob kršenju načel iz člena 9(-1).
A data subject shall have the right to obtain without undue delay the information as to which data are being processed in a language which he or she understands, as well as to rectify and, where appropriate, erase data processed in breach of the principles referred to in Article 9(-1).
Obveščanje iz odstavka 1 se lahko zavrne ali odloži, če je to nujno potrebno za:
The information referred to in paragraph 1 may be refused or delayed if strictly necessary in order:
(c) preprečitev oviranja preiskave in pregona kaznivih dejanj;
(c) not to hamper the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences;
Člen 11 – odstavek 1 – točka a – točka iv a (novo)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
(iv)a podatke o prepovedih, ki izhajajo iz kazenske obsodbe.
(iv a) information on disqualifications arising from a criminal conviction,
Proposal for a Council framework decision
Proposal for a Council framework decision
Člen 11 – odstavek 1 – točka b – točka iv
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
(iv) podatke o prepovedih, ki izhajajo iz kazenske obsodbe.
(iv) information on disqualifications arising from a criminal conviction,
Komisija je 22. decembra 2005 objavila predlog okvirnega sklepa o pripravi in vsebini izmenjave podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence.
On 22 December 2005 the Commission published its proposal for a Framework Decision on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from criminal records.
Namen tega predloga je izboljšati komunikacijo med pravosodnimi organi in zagotoviti, da se na zahtevke držav članic po podatkih iz kazenske evidence odgovori ustrezno ter na celovit in izčrpen način.
The purpose of the proposal is to improve communication between the judicial authorities and to ensure that requests for information from the Member States concerning criminal records are replied to properly and in a comprehensive, exhaustive fashion.
Poglavitne teme, ki jih obravnava predlog, so:
The main topics dealt with in the proposal are:
Obveznost države članice, v kateri je bila izrečena obsodba, da nemudoma posreduje državi članici državljanstva popolne podatke o obsodbah, izrečenih proti njenim državljanom.
The obligation for the Member State of conviction to transmit immediately to the Member State of nationality full information concerning the convictions handed down on its nationals.
Obveznost države članice državljanstva, da shranjuje in posodablja vse prejete podatke.
Obligation for the Member State of nationality to store and update all information received.
Pogoji in postopki za odgovarjanje na zahteve po podatkih iz kazenske evidence.
Conditions and procedure for replying to a request for information concerning a criminal record.
Svet EU je 6. februarja 2008 sklenil, da se bo ponovno posvetoval z Evropskim parlamentom.
On 6 February 2008 the EU Council decided to consult the European Parliament again.
Dodatno posvetovanje je utemeljeno glede na večje spremembe izvirnega besedila ter zlasti zaradi vključitve nekaterih predlogov Parlamenta in pobude Kraljevine Belgije o priznavanju in izvrševanju prepovedi, ki so posledica obsodb za spolne delikte nad otroci.
Further consultation is justified in view of the major changes which have been made to the original text and in particular the incorporation of some of Parliament's proposals and the Kingdom of Belgium's initiative concerning the recognition and enforcement of prohibitions arising from convictions for sexual offences committed against children.
Poročevalec pozdravlja dejstvo, da so bili sprejeti številni predlogi iz poročila Parlamenta z dne 21. junija 2007.
The rapporteur welcomes the fact that many of the proposals contained in Parliament’s 21 June 2007 report have been accepted.
Poročevalec obžaluje tudi dejstvo, da se je Svet odločil za oblikovanje dvojnega sistema, kar zadeva obsodbe, izrečene v državi članici, ki ni država članica, katere državljanstvo ima obsojena oseba (en sistem naj bi se uporabljal v notranjem okolju, drugi sistem pa bi se uporabljal v drugih državah članicah, katerim naj bi se posredovali podatki o obsodbah).
The rapporteur also regrets the fact that the Council has chosen to establish a dual system as regards convictions handed down in a Member State other than the Member State of which the convicted person is a national (one system would be used in the domestic sphere and the second would be used in the other Member States to which information relating to convictions is to be transmitted).
S tovrstnim dvojnim sistemom postane težka naloga posredovanja podatkov zgolj še bolj zapletena in begajoča – to pa je dejavnik, ki opravičuje ohranitev sistema, ki ga je v izhodišču predlagala Komisija in v skladu s katerim bi vsaki spremembi ali izbrisu v kazenski evidenci v državi članici, kjer je bila obsodba izrečena, morala slediti enaka sprememba ali izbris v državi članici, katere državljan je obsojena oseba.
A dual system of this kind would only make the difficult task of transmitting information more complex and more confusing - a factor which justifies retention of the system originally proposed by the Commission, pursuant to which any change to or deletion of a criminal record in the Member State of conviction would require the same amendment or deletion to be carried out in the Member State of which the person convicted is a national.
Opozoriti moramo na nekatere vidike predloga, o katerih bi moral Svet in države članice temeljito premisliti.
We must draw attention to certain aspects of the proposal which should perhaps be considered thoroughly by the Council and the Member States.
Zaskrbljujoči dokazi kažejo na to, da spolnim prestopnikom in drugim izjemno nevarnim posameznikom koristi odsotnost učinkovitega sistema za izmenjavo podatkov ter da izkoriščajo omejitve, ki veljajo za sedanje pristojnosti EU.
There is alarming evidence to the effect that sexual delinquents and other extremely dangerous individuals benefit from the lack of an effective information-exchange system and take advantage of the limits imposed on the EU’s current powers.