natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tudi je priporočljivo, da so podani odgovori podrobni in širši od tistih, ki jih posredujejo države članice, prav tako pa je treba na primer upoštevati ugotovitve neodvisnih preiskav, da bi poiskali tehtnejši pristop do posameznih vprašanj.
Accordingly, it is advisable for those answers to be detailed, to go beyond the bounds of the replies submitted by the Member States and, furthermore, to draw on, for example, the findings of independent investigations, in order to reflect a more cogent approach to the individual issues raised.
Glede na to, da je leta 2006, kot tudi v prejšnjih letih, 70 % preiskav, ki jih je sprožil varuh človekovih pravic, zadevalo Komisijo, je zelo pomembno, da varuh človekovih pravic sodeluje s Komisijo in tako zagotovi, da ta uporablja temeljna načela dobrega upravljanja in doseže napredek na področjih, ki jih varuh človekovih pravic najpogosteje preiskuje.
Given that in 2006, as in previous years, 70% of the inquiries opened by the Ombudsman concerned the Commission, it is extremely important for the Ombudsman to cooperate with the Commission with a view to ensuring that the latter applies the fundamental principles of good administration and makes improvements in the areas that are most often the subject of Ombudsman inquiries.
Poročilo o spremljanju prava Skupnosti za leto 2006
Report on the monitoring of Community law in 2006
Skupno število postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki jih je sprožila Komisija, se je rahlo znižalo, in sicer z 2653 v letu 2005 na 2518 v letu 2006.
The overall number of infringement proceedings initiated by the Commission fell slightly from 2 653 in 2005 to 2 518 in 2006.
Do 31. decembra 2006 je bilo od 2.518 evidentiranih zadev 1.642 zadev še vedno v obravnavi.
By 31 December 2006, 1 642 of the 2 518 cases registered were still ongoing.
Poleg tega se je rahlo zmanjšalo tudi število evidentiranih pritožb, in sicer s 1.154 v letu 2005 na 1.049.
There was also a slight decrease in the number of complaints registered, from 1 154 in 2005 to 1 049.
Pritožbe so obsegale 41,7 % vseh kršitev, ugotovljenih v letu 2006.
Complaints accounted for 41.7% of the total infringements detected in 2006.
Število postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki jih je sprožila Komisija na podlagi lastnih preiskav, se je povečalo s 433 v letu 2005 na 565 v letu 2006 (torej za 24 %) za EU-25.
The number of infringement proceedings initiated by the Commission on the basis of its own investigations rose from 433 in 2005 to 565 in 2006 (i.e. by 24%) for the EU-25.
Za EU-25 se je število postopkov zaradi neprijave ukrepov za prenos v primerjavi z letom 2005 zmanjšalo za 16 %, in sicer s 1 079 na 904.
In respect of the EU-25, the number of proceedings for failure to notify transposing measures decreased by 16% with respect to 2005, from 1 079 to 904 cases.
To je delno mogoče pojasniti z dvema razlogoma: To je delno mogoče obrazložiti: prvič, z zmanjšanjem števila direktiv z rokom v zadevnem letu s 123 v letu 2005 na 108 in drugič, z izboljšavami v zvezi s pravočasnim obveščanjem s strani držav članic.
This is partly explained by two factors: (1) a reduction in the number of directives with a deadline for the year from 123 in 2005 to 108; and (2) prompter notification by Member States.
Povprečni čas, potreben za obravnavanje vseh kršitev v obdobju 1999–2005, in sicer od evidentiranja zadeve v določenem roku do pošiljanja pisma o predložitvi Sodišču v skladu s členom 226 pogodbe o ES, je bil 20,5 meseca, medtem ko je v obdobju 1999–2002 to trajalo 24 mesecev.
The average time taken to process all the infringements in the period 1999-2005, from registration of the case within the specified time limit to the sending of the letter of referral to the Court of Justice under Article 226 of the ECT was 20.5 months, compared with 24 months for the period 1999-2002.
Boj proti diskriminaciji v Evropski uniji
Combating discrimination within the European Union
Načelo nediskriminacije iz člena 12 (prepoved diskriminacije zaradi državljanstva) in člena 13 (prepoved diskriminacije zaradi spola, rase ali narodnosti, vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti) iz pogodbe o ES je eno izmed temeljev evropskega integracijskega procesa.
The principle of non-discrimination established in Article 12 (prohibiting discrimination on grounds of nationality) and Article 13 (prohibiting discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation) of the ECT is one of the cornerstones of the European integration process.
Prav tako je neposredno povezano z načelom prostega gibanja oseb, storitev, blaga in kapitala.
It is also directly connected with the principle of the free movement of persons, services, goods and capital.
Državljanstvo EU, kot ga uvaja maastrichtska pogodba (člen 17 PES), zagotavlja državljanom številne pravice (pravica do prostega gibanja na ozemlju držav članic, pravica voliti in biti voljen na volitvah v Evropski parlament, pravica do diplomatske zaščite zunaj meja EU in pravica do komuniciranja z institucijami EU, kar vključuje pravico do naslovitve peticije na Evropski parlament), institucije EU pa so poroki za te pravice.
EU citizenship, as established in the Maastricht Treaty (Article 17 of the ECT), guarantees citizens a number of rights (right to move freely within the territory of the Member States, to vote and stand as a candidate in local and European Parliament elections, to diplomatic protection outside EU borders, and to correspond with the EU institutions, which includes the right to petition the European Parliament), and the EU institutions stand as guarantors of those rights.
Analiza sodne prakse Sodišča kaže, da pojem državljanstva bistveno razširja domet načela o nediskriminaciji.
An analysis of Court of Justice case law shows that the concept of citizenship significantly broadens the scope of the principle of non-discrimination.
Pravo Skupnosti je državam članicam že od nekdaj prepovedovalo, da bi tujim državljanom namenile manj ugodno obravnavo kot svojim.
Traditionally, Community law has forbidden any Member State to treat non-nationals less favourably than its own citizens.
Sedaj pa države članice ne smejo manj ugodno obravnavati tudi svojih državljanov, ki so izkoristili pravice iz pogodbe (glej med drugim primera C-520/04, Turpeinen, in C-192/05, Tas-Hagen in Tas).
Now, Member States may not treat their own citizens who have taken advantage of the rights guaranteed by the Treaty less favourably than those who have not (see, inter alia, Case C-520/04, Turpeinen, and Case C-192/05, Tas-Hagen and Tas).
Države članice so državljanom dolžne zagotavljati pravice, ki izhajajo iz njihovega statusa državljanov EU.
Member States are obliged to guarantee citizens the rights deriving from their status as EU citizens.
Pred volitvami v Evropski parlament je treba posebno pozornost nameniti pravici do kandidiranja na volitvah.
In the run-up to the EP elections, particular emphasis needs to be placed on the right to take part in those elections.
· pravica državljanov EU do prostega gibanja
· EU citizens' right to freedom of movement
Rok za prenos direktive 2004/38/ES, ki razširja domet načela o prostem gibanju državljanov EU po ozemlju držav članic, je potekel leta 2006.
The time period for transposition of Directive 2004/38/EC, which extends the scope of the principle of freedom of movement for EU citizens within the territory of the Member States expired in 2006.
Za razliko od prejšnjih direktiv o prostem gibanju oseb, ki so se nanašale le na posamezne sektorje, vsebuje direktiva 2004/38/ES povezovalne določbe, ki zadevajo državljane EU in njihove družinske člane.
Unlike previous directives on the free movement of persons, which were sectoral in scope, Directive 2004/38/EC lays down cross-cutting provisions applying to EU citizens and members of their families.
Po podatkih Komisije so se v številnih državah članicah pojavili problemi v zvezi z obveščanjem o nacionalnih ukrepih za prenos in s kakovostjo teh ukrepov.
According to the information supplied by the Commission, problems have arisen in many Member States in connection with the notification of national transposing measures and the quality of those measures.
Do danes je večina držav članic izpolnila stare obveznosti.
To date, most Member States have complied with the former obligation.
Komisija je 19. maja 2008 pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti začela postopek proti Združenemu kraljestvu zaradi neobveščanja o nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepih.
On 19 March 2008 the Commission brought a case against the UK before the CJEC for failing to notify national implementing measures.
Trenutno preverja tudi kakovost ukrepov za prenos, ki sta jih sprejeli Malta in Italija.
The Commission is currently also looking into the quality of transposing measures adopted by Malta and Italy.
Prav tako Parlament redno prejema peticije s pritožbami, da države članice kršijo določbe direktive.
Furthermore, Parliament regularly receives petitions complaining of infringements of the directive's provisions by Member States.
Odbor za peticije je novembra 2006 na primer prejel peticijo državljana Združenega kraljestva, ki se je pritožil, da je britanska vlada kršila direktivo.
For instance, in November 2006 the Committee on Petitions received a petition from a UK national, complaining that the UK Government was acting in breach of the directive.
Britanske oblasti so zahtevale, da žena vlagatelja peticije, ki je bila državljanka tretje države s pravico do stalnega prebivališča v Belgiji, pridobi vizum, kar se je zdelo v nasprotju z določbami direktive 2004/38/ES.
The UK authorities were demanding that the petitioner's wife, a third-country national with the right of permanent residence in Belgium, obtain a visa, which appeared to be contrary to the provisions of Directive 2004/38/EC.
Pritožba je bila posredovana Komisiji, ki je od britanske vlade zahtevala pojasnila.
The complaint was forwarded to the Commission, which requested clarifications from the UK Government.
Parlament še čaka na obvestilo o tem, kaj je sledilo zahtevi po pojasnilu.
Parliament has yet to be notified of the outcome of that request for clarification.
Očitno bi bilo torej smiselno, če bi Komisija oblikovala poročilo o uporabi direktive, kot je to obljubila v letu 2008.
There would therefore appear to be good reason for the Commission to draw up a report on implementation of the directive, as it has stated that it will do in 2008.
· diskriminacija zaradi rase in diskriminacija na delovnem mestu
· discrimination on grounds of racial origin and discrimination at work
Komisija je leta 2006 prejela 57 pritožb, povezanih z novo zaposlitvijo.
In 2006 the Commission received 57 new employment-related complaints.
V določenem številu pritožb je bilo navedeno, da se členi in/ali načela pogodbe, ki so zapisana v sekundarni zakonodaji (torej v določbah uredb) v zvezi s socialno varnostjo in prostim gibanjem delavcev, napačno uporabljajo.
A certain number of the complaints alleged that Treaty articles and/or principles laid down in secondary legislation (i.e. provisions in regulations) concerning social security and the free movement of workers had been wrongly applied.
Druge pritožbe so se nanašale na kršitve prava Skupnosti v zvezi z zaposlovanjem ter zdravjem in varnostjo pri delu.
Others covered infringements of Community law on employment and health and safety at the workplace.
Direktivi o rasni enakopravnosti (direktiva 2000/43/ES) in o enakem obravnavanju pri zaposlovanju (direktiva 2000/78/ES) od držav članic zahtevata, da izvajata okvirno zakonodajo, ki prepoveduje diskriminacijo zaradi rase ali narodnosti, vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti ter ki predpisuje načelo enakega obravnavanja.
The directive on racial equality (Directive 2000/43/EC) and the directive on equal treatment in employment (Directive 2000/78/EC) require Member States to enact framework legislation prohibiting discrimination on grounds of racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation and implementing the principle of equal treatment.
Direktivi nudita zaščito pred diskriminacijo pri zaposlovanju, delu in poklicnem usposabljanju vsem prebivalcem EU, tudi tistim, ki nimajo državljanstva EU.
The directives afford protection to all EU residents, including non-EU nationals, against discrimination in employment, occupation and professional training.
Obe sta bili sprejeti leta 2000 in uvajata novosti, saj države članice med drugim zavezujeta k ustanovitvi organa za spodbujanje enakega obravnavanja vseh oseb brez diskriminiranja zaradi rase ali narodnosti.
Both directives were adopted in 2000 and are innovative in that they oblige the Member States to, among other things, set up a body for the promotion of equal treatment of all persons without discrimination on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin.
Čeprav je rok za začetek uporabe direktiv potekel leta 2003, nekatere države članice določb še vedno niso prenesle v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Although the deadline for implementation of the directives expired in 2003, some Member States have yet to transpose their provisions into national law.
Komisija je februarja 2006 proti 11 izmed 15 starih držav članic začela postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev zaradi neskladnosti nacionalne zakonodaje z določbami direktive o rasni enakopravnosti (direktiva 2000/43/ES), junija istega leta pa je začela postopke proti desetim novim državam članicam.
In February 2006 the Commission initiated infringement proceedings for non-compliance of national legislation with the provisions of the directive on racial equality (Directive 2000/43/EC) against 11 of the EU-15 Member States and in June of the same year initiated proceedings against the 10 new Member States.
Decembra 2006 je Komisija proti 18 državam članicam začela postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev zaradi neskladnosti nacionalne zakonodaje z določbami direktive o enakem obravnavanju pri zaposlovanju (direktiva 2000/78/ES).
In December 2006 the Commission initiated infringement proceedings against 18 Member States for non-compliance of national legislation with the provisions of the directive on equality in employment (Directive 2000/78/EC).
Neskladnost nacionalnih sredstev za prenos zadeva predvsem omejen individualni in fizični domet nacionalnega prava v primerjavi z direktivo, neskladnost med nacionalnimi opredelitvami koncepta diskriminacije ter različne določbe v zvezi z zaščito ranljivih oseb.
Non-compliance of national legislation mainly concerns the restrictive individual and material scope of the national law compared to the directive, non-conformity of national definitions of discrimination and disparities in provisions on the protection of injured parties.
· diskriminacija pri izobraževanju in usposabljanju
· discrimination in education and training
Še vedno obstaja veliko ovir za prosto gibanje študentov po EU.
There are still a large number of barriers hampering the free movement of students within the EU.
Zaradi omejene pristojnosti Unije na tem področju mnoge izmed teh ovir ne kršijo prava Skupnosti.
Owing to the Union's limited competence in this field, many such barriers do not infringe Community law.
Komisija je leta 2006 prejela 15 novih pritožb, ki se nanašajo na:
In 2006 the Commission received 15 new complaints concerning the following issues:
§ priznavanje izobrazbe
§ recognition of educational qualifications
Na področju priznavanja izobrazbe lahko EU poseže samo v primerih diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva.
In connection with the recognition of educational qualifications, the EU can only intervene in cases involving discrimination on grounds of nationality.
V mnogih primerih so ovire upravne narave, kot na primer trajanje ali stroški postopkov priznavanja.
In many cases, the obstacles are of an administrative nature, such as the length or cost of recognition procedures.
V letu 2006 sta bila sprožena dva postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev.
Two infringement procedures were initiated in 2006.
V prvem je zadevna država članica (Grčija) po prejetju obrazloženega mnenja spremenila svojo zakonodajo.
In the first, following receipt of the reasoned opinion, the Member State concerned (Greece) amended its legislation.
V drugem, ki se je nanašal na Portugalsko, je bilo obrazloženo mnenje poslano v začetku leta 2007.
In the second, involving Portugal, a reasoned opinion was sent in early 2007.
§ dostop do izobraževanja
§ access to education
V zvezi z načelom nediskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva se je v letu 2006 pojavila nova težava, ki izhaja iz razlik v organizaciji sistemov izobraževanja v državah članicah.
With reference to the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality, 2006 brought to light another difficulty stemming from differences in the way education systems are organised in the Member States.
V Avstriji in Belgiji se je zaradi uporabe načela enakega obravnavanja povečalo število študentov EU v sistemih visokošolskega izobraževanja, saj sta ti dve državi članici uporabili politiko prostega dostopa do visokošolskega izobraževanja za svoje državljane, medtem ko sosednji državi članici (Nemčija in Francija) na določenih študijskih področjih uporabljata stroge določbe numerus clausus.
In Austria and Belgium the application of the principle of equal treatment led to a major increase in the number of EU students in higher education, as these Member States apply a policy of free access to higher education for their nationals, whereas neighbouring Member States (Germany and France) apply strict numerus clausus provisions in certain fields of study.
Zato sta Avstrija in Belgija sprejeli diskriminatoren sistem kvot za vpis nedržavljanov na svoje univerze.
This led the former countries to adopt discriminatory quota systems for the enrolment of non-nationals in their universities.
To različno obravnavanje je sprejemljivo samo, če temelji na objektivnih ugotovitvah, neodvisnih od državljanstva zadevnih oseb in sorazmernih z zakonitim ciljem nacionalnih določb, to pa doslej še ni bilo dokazano.
This differential treatment could be accepted only if based on objective considerations independent of the nationality of the persons concerned and proportionate to the legitimate aim of the national provisions, and this has not been demonstrated so far.
· spolna diskriminacija
· gender discrimination
Komisija je leta 2006 začela postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev zaradi neobveščanja o nacionalnih ukrepih za prenos direktiv 86/378/EGS in 96/97/ES o enakem obravnavanju moških in žensk v poklicnih sistemih socialne varnosti in direktive 96/34/ES o starševskem dopustu.
In 2006 the Commission initiated infringement proceedings for failure to notify national measures transposing Directives 86/378/EEC and 96/97/EC, on equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes, and Directive 96/34/EC on parental leave.
Prav tako je Komisija izdala obrazložena mnenja v zvezi z direktivo 2002/73/ES o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v poklicnih sistemih socialne varnosti, in sicer kar zadeva zaposlovanje, poklicno usposabljanje in napredovanje ter delovne pogoje.
The Commission also issued reasoned opinions in connection with Directive 2002/73/EC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions.
Do takrat je vse določbe direktive prenesla le ena država članica, Španija, in to navkljub dejstvu, da je rok za prenos potekel novembra 2005.
At the time, only one Member State – Spain – had transposed all of the directive's provisions, despite the fact that the deadline for transposition was November 2005.
Devet držav članic je Komisijo o svojih nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepih obvestilo tik pred pretekom roka, zaradi česar so bili proti njim sproženi postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev.
Nine Member States notified their national implementing measures to the Commission only just before the deadline, which resulted in infringement proceedings being initiated against them.
Trenutno potekajo postopki le še proti Luksemburgu in Belgiji.
The only proceedings still in progress are those against Luxembourg and Belgium.
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 6. marca 2008 ugotovilo, da Luksemburg še vedno ni prenesel direktive v celoti.
In a judgment of 6 March 2008 the Court of Justice found that Luxembourg had still not fully transposed the directive.
Nadaljnja obravnava
A further consideration
Ustrezen prenos in uporaba prava Skupnosti je pogosto predpogoj za dostop do strukturnih skladov, ki so namenjeni naložbenim in infrastrukturnim projektom, ki državam članicam omogočajo pospešitev regionalnega razvoja in izboljšanja kakovosti življenja državljanov.
Proper transposition and application of Community law is often a precondition for access to structural funding available for investment and infrastructure projects, which afford Member States an opportunity to foster regional development and improve their citizens' quality of life.
Komisija je leta 2006 prejela 28 novih pritožb v zvezi s postopki za izbiro projektov, ki so vključeni v različne programe EU, v zvezi z dodeljevanjem pogodb v razpisnih postopkih ter v zvezi s posledicami zakonodaje EU na okolje in z neustrezno porabo javnih sredstev za slabo pripravljene naložbe v ceste ali druge pomembne infrastrukturne projekte.
In 2006 the Commission received 28 new complaints concerning procedures used to select projects coming under various EU programmes, the award of contracts under tendering procedures, the impact of EU law on the environment and the misspending of public monies on ill-considered investments in roads and other major infrastructure projects.
Eden od primerov, ko država članica zaradi neizvajanja prava Skupnosti ni bila upravičena do razpoložljivih strukturnih skladov, je Poljska, ki svoje okoljske zakonodaje ni uskladila z direktivami EU in ni oblikovala območij Natura 2000.
One example of failure to implement Community law preventing a Member State from taking up available structural funding is Poland's failure to bring its environmental law into line with EU directives and to designate Natura 2000 sites.
o spodbujanju socialne vključenosti in boja proti revščini, vključno z revščino otrok, v EU
on promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, including child poverty, in the EU
Pripravljavka mnenja (*) :
Rapporteur for opinion (*):
Anna Záborská , Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov
Anna Záborská , Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori - člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committee – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov (*) .............................26
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (*) 26
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori - člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated Committee - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta 92/441/EGS z dne 24. junija 1992 o skupnih merilih v zvezi z zadostnimi sredstvi in socialno pomočjo v sistemih socialnega varstva in priporočila Sveta 92/442/EGS z dne 27. julija 1992 o zbliževanju politik in ciljev socialne zaščite,
– having regard to Council Recommendation 92/441/EEC of 24 June 1992 on common criteria concerning sufficient resources and social assistance in social protection systems and to Council Recommendation 92/442/EEC of 27 July 1992 on the convergence of social protection objectives and policies,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o pravičnemu plačilu ( KOM(1993)0388 ),
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on an equitable wage ( COM(1993)0388 ),
– ob upoštevanju nacionalnih programov reform v okviru lizbonske strategije, nacionalnih poročil o strategijah za socialno zaščito in socialno vključevanje 2006–2008 in njihovih posodobitev iz leta 2007, ki so jih predstavile države članice,
– having regard to the national Lisbon reform programmes, the national reports on strategies for social protection and social inclusion 2006-2008 and updates 2007 as presented by the Member States,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delovne skupine Odbora za socialno zaščito o revščini in dobrem počutju otrok v EU iz januarja 2008,
– having regard to the Social Protection Committee Task Force Report on Child Poverty and Well Being in the EU of January 2008,