natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
30 dni je realnejše obdobje.
30 days is more realistic term.
Člen 4 b – odstavek 4 – pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 4 b – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Shema šteje za privilegiranega upnika in ima absolutno prednost.
The scheme shall be considered to be a privileged creditor and shall have first rank of preference.
Člen 4 b – odstavek 4 – pododstavek 1 b (novo)
Article 4 b – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 b (new)
Glej obrazložitev k predlogu spremembe 7.
See the justification to AM 7.
Člen 4 b – odstavek 5– pododstavek 1
Article 4 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Pri takih sporazumih se upoštevajo zahteve iz Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov .
Such agreements shall take into account the requirements set out in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data .
Če ukrepi iz odstavka 1 ne zagotovijo izpolnitve obveznosti investicijskega podjetja, KNPVP, depozitarja ali tretje osebe, lahko odškodninska shema na podlagi izrecnega soglasja pristojnih organov investicijsko podjetje, KNPVP, depozitarja ali tretjo osebo obvesti, da bodo v roku, ki ni krajši od 12 mesecev , izključeni iz odškodninske sheme.
If the measures referred to in paragraph 1 fail to secure compliance on the part of the investment firm, UCITS, depositary or third party, the scheme may, with the express consent of the competent authorities, give not less than 12 months' notice of its intention of excluding the investment firm, UCITS, depositary or third party from membership of the scheme.
Shema bo še naprej zagotavljala kritje iz člena 2(2a) in (2c) za investicijske posle ali dejavnosti KNPVP, ki se opravljajo v tem obdobju.
The scheme shall continue to provide the coverage referred to in Article 2(2a) and (2c) in respect of investment business or UCITS activities carried on during that period.
Če investicijsko podjetje, KNPVP, depozitar ali tretja oseba ob izteku roka ne izpolni svojih obveznosti, ga lahko odškodninska shema na podlagi izrecnega soglasja pristojnih organov izključi.
If, on expiry of the period of notice, the investment firm, UCITS, depositary or third party has not met its obligations, the compensation scheme may, again having obtained the express consent of the competent authorities, exclude it.
Če ukrepi iz odstavka 1 ne zagotovijo izpolnitve obveznosti investicijskega podjetja, KNPVP, depozitarja ali tretje osebe, lahko odškodninska shema na podlagi izrecnega soglasja pristojnih organov investicijsko podjetje, KNPVP, depozitarja ali tretjo osebo obvesti, da bodo v roku, ki ni krajši od šest mesecev , izključeni iz odškodninske sheme.
If the measures referred to in paragraph 1 fail to secure compliance on the part of the investment firm, UCITS, depositary or third party, the scheme may, with the express consent of the competent authorities, give not less than six months' notice of its intention of excluding the investment firm, UCITS, depositary or third party from membership of the scheme.
Šest mesecev je primernejše obdobje za te skrajne razmere.
6 months is a more appropriate term for this extreme situation.
V primeru, da vlagateljeva terjatev ne more biti v celoti pokrita, je vlagatelj deležen enake obrestne mere pokritja za skupno terjatev.
In the event that an investor's claim cannot be fully covered, that investor shall benefit from the same rate of coverage for the aggregate claim.
Načelo sorazmernosti bi moralo biti nedvoumno navedeno.
The pro-rata principle should be written in an unequivocal way.
Če vlagatelj ni upravičen do hranjenih zneskov ali vrednostnih papirjev , prejme odškodnino oseba, ki je upravičena, če je identiteta te osebe ugotovljena ali se lahko ugotovi pred datumom ugotovitve ali odločbe iz člena 2(2) in (2b).
Where an investor is not entitled to the sums or securities held, the person who is entitled shall receive the compensation, provided that that person has been or can be identified before the date of the determination or ruling referred to in Article 2(2) and (2b).
Če vlagatelj ni upravičen do hranjenih zneskov ali instrumentov , prejme odškodnino oseba, ki je upravičena, če je identiteta te osebe ugotovljena ali se lahko ugotovi pred datumom ugotovitve ali odločbe iz člena 2(2) in (2b).
Where an investor is not entitled to the sums or instruments held, the person who is entitled shall receive the compensation, provided that that person has been or can be identified before the date of the determination or ruling referred to in Article 2(2) and (2b).
Shema se ne more sklicevati na dejstvo, da je potekel rok, da bi odklonila kritje vlagatelja, ki ni mogel pravočasno uveljaviti svoje pravice do odškodnine, razen v primeru malomarnosti vlagatelja .
The fact that that period has expired may not be invoked by the scheme to deny coverage to an investor who has been unable to assert his right to compensation in time , save in the situation of negligence on the part of the investor .
Investicijska podjetja in KNPVP na svojem spletnem mestu razkrijejo ali v pisni obliki pripravijo vse informacije o pogojih za dostop do odškodninske sheme in postopek za pridobitev plačila iz nje.
Investment firms and UCITS shall disclose on their websites, or make available in writing, all information concerning the terms and conditions regarding access to the compensation scheme and the procedure for obtaining payment thereunder.
Ne glede na rok iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 2 lahko odškodninska shema izplačilo začasno odloži do razsodbe sodišča ali odločitve pristojnega organa, če je vlagatelj ali katera koli druga oseba, ki je upravičena ali ima delež v investicijskem poslu, obdolžena za prekršek, ki izhaja iz pranja denarja, kot je opredeljeno v členu 1 Direktive 2005/60/EGS, ali je z njim povezan, ali pa je predmet tožbe zaradi kršitve Direktive 2003/6/ES.
Notwithstanding the time limit laid down in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, where an investor or any other person entitled to or having an interest in investment business has been charged with an offence arising out of or in relation to money laundering as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC or is the subject of action for contravention of Directive 2003/6/EC, the compensation scheme may suspend any payment pending the judgment of the court or determination of a competent authority.
Ne glede na rok iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 2 lahko odškodninska shema izplačilo začasno odloži do razsodbe sodišča ali odločitve pristojnega organa, če je vlagatelj ali katera koli druga oseba, ki je upravičena ali ima delež v investicijskem poslu, obdolžena za prekršek, ki izhaja iz pranja denarja, kot je opredeljeno v členu 1 Direktive 2005/60/EGS , glede denarja, ki je predmet te direktive , ali je z njim povezan, ali pa je predmet tožbe zaradi kršitve Direktive 2003/6/ES.
Notwithstanding the time limit laid down in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, where an investor or any other person entitled to or having an interest in investment business has been charged with an offence arising out of or in relation to money laundering as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC in relation to money that is the subject of this Directive , or is the subject of action for contravention of Directive 2003/6/EC, the compensation scheme may suspend any payment pending the judgment of the court or determination of a competent authority.
Jasno je treba navesti, da se ne zavrne izplačilo vsake odškodnine, ampak le tiste, pri kateri gre za pranje denarja.
It is clearly stated that not any compensation is rejected but that compensation that is subject to the money laundry.
Sheme, ki vlagateljem izplačajo odškodnino, imajo pravico do zamenjave za pravice strank v postopkih likvidacije za zneske, ki so enaki njihovim plačilom, kar pa ne vpliva na druge pravice, ki jih utegnejo imeti po nacionalni zakonodaji.
Without prejudice to any other rights which they may have under national law, schemes which make payments in order to compensate investors shall have the right of subrogation to the rights of those in liquidation proceedings for amounts equal to their payments.
Z odstopanjem od odstavkov 1 in 2 se države članice, za katere po določbah pristopnih pogodb veljajo prehodna obdobja za prenos člena 4 Direktive 97/9/ES, od datuma, ko potečejo posamezna prehodna obdobja, ravnajo v skladu z odstavkoma 1 in 2.
By derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States that benefit under the Accession Treaties from transitional periods regarding the transposition of Article 4 of Directive 97/9/EC shall comply with paragraphs 1 and 2 from the date when their respective transitional periods expire.
Predlogi spremembe te direktive morajo upoštevati države članice, za katere veljajo prehodna obdobja, saj so ta obdobja navedena v pristopnih pogodbah.
It is necessary that the amendments to this directive to consider the situation of the Member States which benefit of transitional periods, due to the fact that such periods are mentioned in the Accession Treaties.
Burkhard Balz, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), George Sabin Cutaş, Rachida Dati, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Elisa Ferreira, Vicky Ford, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Astrid Lulling, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Sławomir Witold Nitras, Ivari Padar, Alfredo Pallone, Ani Podimata (Anni Podimata), Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Edward Scicluna, Peter Simon, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Burkhard Balz, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Nikolaos Chountis, George Sabin Cutaş, Rachida Dati, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Elisa Ferreira, Vicky Ford, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Astrid Lulling, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Sławomir Witold Nitras, Ivari Padar, Alfredo Pallone, Anni Podimata, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Edward Scicluna, Peter Simon, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE........................................................................................................22
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................23
o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) v letu 2009, predloženem Evropskemu parlamentu v skladu z delom II, točko G, odstavka 43 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) v letu 2009, predloženega Evropskemu parlamentu v skladu z delom II, točko G, odstavka 43 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006
– having regard to the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament pursuant to Part II, Section G, paragraph 43, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju,
– having regard to the above-mentioned Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o letnih poročilih o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki za leto 2007 in 2008 z dne 19. februarja 2009
– having regard to its resolutions of 19 February 2009
UL C 76 E, 25.3.2010, str.
OJ C 76 E, 25.3.2010, p.
54. in z dne 10. marca 2010
54. and 10 March 2010
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0060 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA (2010)0060. on the 2007 and 2008 CFSP annual reports respectively,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. julija 2010
– having regard to its resolution of 8 July 2010
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0280 . o Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0280 . on the European External Action Service,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. novembra 2010 o krepitvi organizacije OVSE – vloga EU
– having regard to its resolution of 11 November 2010 on strengthening the OSCE: a role for the EU
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0399 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0399 . ,
– ob upoštevanju izjave podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko o politični odgovornosti
– having regard to the declaration by the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) on political accountability
Prav tam, priloga II. ,
Ibid, Annex II. ,
– ob upoštevanju izjave visoke predstavnice na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta o osnovni organizaciji osrednje uprave Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) z dne 8. julija 2010
– having regard to the statement made by the High Representative in the plenary of the European Parliament on the basic organisation of the EEAS central administration on 8 July 2010
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0280 , priloga. ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0280 , annex. ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 16. septembra 2010 o zunanjih odnosih EU,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 16 September 2010 on the EU’s external relations,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A7-0168/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0168/2011 ),
A. ker mora EU dodatno razvijati cilje svoje zunanje politike in po vsem svetu spodbujati svoje vrednote in interese, da bi prispevala k miru, varnosti, solidarnosti, preprečevanju konfliktov, spodbujanju demokracije, varovanju človekovih pravic, enakosti spolov, spoštovanju mednarodnega prava, podpiranju mednarodnih institucij, učinkoviti večstranskosti in medsebojnemu spoštovanju med narodi, trajnostnemu razvoju, svobodni in pošteni trgovini ter izkoreninjanju revščine,
A. whereas the EU should further develop its foreign policy objectives and advance its values and interests worldwide with the overall aim of contributing to peace, security, solidarity, conflict prevention, the promotion of democracy, the protection of human rights, gender equality, respect for international law, support for international institutions, effective multilateralism and mutual respect among nations, sustainable development, free and fair trade and the eradication of poverty,
B. ker izvajanje Lizbonske pogodbe prinaša novo razsežnost evropskemu zunanjemu delovanju in bo prispevalo h krepitvi skladnosti, povezanosti in učinkovitosti zunanje politike EU, ter obsežneje njenim zunanjim ukrepom,
B. whereas the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty is bringing a new dimension to European external action and will be instrumental in enhancing the coherence, consistency and effectiveness of EU foreign policy and, more broadly, external actions,
C. ker Lizbonska pogodba daje nov zagon zunanji politiki EU, zlasti z zagotavljanjem institucionalnih in operativnih orodij, ki bi Uniji lahko omogočila, da prevzame mednarodno vlogo, ki je sorazmerna z njenim zelo pomembnim gospodarskim statusom in njenimi prizadevanji, ter da se organizira tako, da bo uspešen svetovni akter, ki bo lahko prevzel del odgovornosti za svetovno varnost in prevzel vodstvo pri določanju skupnih odgovorov na skupne izzive,
C. whereas the Lisbon Treaty is creating a new momentum in EU foreign policy, notably providing institutional and operational tools which could enable the Union to take on an international role compatible with its prominent economic status and its ambitions and to organise itself in such a way as to be an effective global player, able to share responsibility for global security and take the lead in defining common responses to common challenges,
D. ker nov zagon evropskega zunanjega delovanja prav tako zahteva, da EU deluje bolj strateško, da bi tako lahko uveljavila svoj pomen na mednarodnem prizorišču; ker sposobnost EU, da vpliva na mednarodni red, ni odvisna zgolj od skladnosti njenih politik, akterjev in institucij, temveč tudi od dejanskega strateškega koncepta zunanje politike EU, ki mora združiti vse države članice v sklopu istega niza prednostnih nalog in ciljev, tako da bodo na mednarodnem prizorišču nastopile z odločnim enotnim stališčem; ker je treba zunanji politiki EU zagotoviti potrebna sredstva in instrumente za učinkovito in skladno delovanje Unije na svetovni ravni,
D. whereas the new momentum in European external action also requires the EU to act more strategically so as to bring its weight to bear internationally; whereas the EU’s ability to influence the international order depends not only on coherence between its policies, actors and institutions, but also on a real strategic concept of EU foreign policy which must unite all Member States behind the same set of priorities and goals, so that they speak with a strong single voice in the international arena; whereas the EU foreign policy must be provided with the necessary means and instruments in order to enable the Union to act effectively and consistently on the world stage,
E. ker se s pojavom novih izzivov in novih političnih struktur odvija veliko preoblikovanje sedanjega mednarodnega reda, ki od EU zahteva, da dejavneje sodeluje z zdajšnjimi in novimi silami in nedržavnimi akterji, pa tudi z dvostranskimi in večstranskimi partnerji in institucijami, da bi spodbudila učinkovito reševanje problemov, ki so skupni evropskim in svetovnim državljanom ter ki bodo morda vplivali na svetovno varnost,
E. whereas a substantial transformation of the current international order is taking place with the emergence of new challenges and the creation of new power structures, requiring the EU to engage more actively with present and emerging powers and non-state actors as well as with bilateral and multilateral partners and institutions in order to promote effective solutions to problems which are common to European citizens and the world at large, and that might have an impact on global security,
F. ker mora nov zagon privesti tudi do opredelitve nove paradigme za strateška partnerstva EU, nova in stara, na osnovi skupnih univerzalnih vrednot, kot so spodbujanje demokracije, spoštovanje človekovih pravic, temeljnih svoboščin, pravne države, mednarodnega reda, ter medsebojnih koristi, interesov in skupnega razumevanja svetovne varnosti,
F. whereas the new momentum also needs to lead to the definition of a new paradigm for the EU's strategic partnerships, both new and old, and whereas this should be based on shared universal values such as the drive for democracy, respect for human rights, basic freedoms, the rule of law and international law, as well as on mutual benefits, interests and a common understanding of global security,
G. ker je parlamentarni nadzor zunanje politike EU bistvenega pomena, če naj državljani EU razumejo in podpirajo evropsko zunanje delovanje; ker nadzor povečuje legitimnost teh ukrepov; ker morajo organizacijo in spodbujanje učinkovitega ter rednega medparlamentarnega sodelovanja v EU skupaj opredeliti Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti, v skladu s členoma 9 in 10 protokola 1 k Lizbonski pogodbi,
G. whereas parliamentary scrutiny of EU foreign policy is essential if European external action is to be understood and supported by EU citizens; whereas the scrutiny enhances the legitimacy of this action; whereas the organisation and promotion of effective and regular inter-parliamentary cooperation within the EU must be jointly determined by the European Parliament and national parliaments, in accordance with Articles 9 and 10 of Protocol 1 to the Lisbon Treaty,
1. pozdravlja letno poročilo Sveta in izreka pohvalo njegovi preglednosti in tematsko usmerjeni strukturi, ki zagotavlja jasen pregled politik in delovanja na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike; pozdravlja tudi željo Sveta, da bi se bolje osredotočil na regionalni okvir konfliktov in vprašanj; vendar obžaluje dejstvo, da poročilo ne vključuje morebitnih pristopov k reševanju teh konfliktov in vprašanj;
Welcomes the Council's annual report and commends its transparent and theme-driven structure, which provides a clear overview of policies and actions in the field of the common foreign and security policy; welcomes also the Council's ambition to place further emphasis and a stronger focus on the regional context of conflicts and issues; regrets, however, the fact that no possible approaches to resolving those conflicts and issues are outlined in the report;
3. meni, da bi letno poročilo o SZVP moralo temeljiti na novem institucionalnem okviru, ki ga je zagotovila Lizbonska pogodba, in služiti kot instrument za okrepljen medinstitucionalni dialog, zlasti z razpravo o izvajanju strategije zunanje politike EU, ocenjevanjem njene učinkovitosti in orisom njene prihodnje smeri;
Believes that the annual report on the CFSP should be based on the new institutional framework created by the Lisbon Treaty and serve as an instrument for enhanced interinstitutional dialogue, notably by discussing the implementation of an EU foreign policy strategy, evaluating its effectiveness and outlining its future direction;
Izvajanje Lizbonske pogodbe
Enforcing the Lisbon Treaty
7. ugotavlja pa, da bo za doseganje celovite povezanosti in učinkovitosti skupne politike EU poleg ustanovitve ESZD predvsem potrebna politična volja držav članic EU, da presežejo svoje različne poglede na osrednja vprašanja zunanje politike; zato meni, da je bistvenega pomena, da se države članice EU sporazumejo o skupni strategiji za zunanjo in varnostno politiko ter da s svojimi nacionalnimi politikami podpirajo stališča EU;
Notes, however, that parallel to setting up the EEAS, the achievement of full coherence and efficiency of the EU common policy will require, first and foremost, the political will of the EU Member States to overcome their differing outlooks on key foreign policy issues; considers it essential, in this regard, that EU Member States not only agree on a common strategy for foreign and security policy, but also ensure that their national policies are supportive of EU positions;
10. opozarja na svojo posebno pravico iz Pogodbe, da je vključen v posvetovanja na področjih SZVP in SVOP, da se njegova mnenja ustrezno upoštevajo in da daje priporočila; poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj združi posvetovalne in poročevalske naloge, ki sta jih doslej na področju zunanjega delovanja izvajala Komisija in Svet; poziva Svet, naj sprejme konstruktiven pristop v okviru spravnega odbora za instrumente zunanje pomoči, vključno z instrumentom za stabilnost, in prizna pravico Evropskega parlamenta do demokratičnega nadzora strateških dokumentov in večletnih akcijskih načrtov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU;
Recalls its Treaty prerogative to be consulted in the CFSP and CSDP spheres, have its views duly taken into account and make recommendations; calls on the VP/HR to consolidate the consultation and reporting duties carried out to date by the Commission and the Council in the area of external action; asks the Council to adopt a constructive approach in the framework of the conciliation committee for the external assistance instruments, including the Instrument for Stability, by recognising the European Parliament's right to democratic scrutiny of strategy papers and multiannual action plans, as established in Article 290 of the TFEU;