natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Besedna zveza „zadostna zaščita“ ni jasno opredeljena.
The expression ‘sufficient protection’ is not clearly defined in the proposal.
Zaščita, do katere bi moral biti prosilec upravičen, če je napoten v prvo državo azila, mora biti učinkovita ter v praksi dostopna.
The protection which an applicant must enjoy if he is sent to a first country of asylum must be effective and, in practice, accessible.
Pri uporabi koncepta prve države azila za okoliščine posameznega prosilca za mednarodno zaščito lahko države članice upoštevajo člen 32(1).
In applying the concept of first country of asylum to the particular circumstances of an applicant for international protection Member States may take into account Article 32 (1).
Pri uporabi koncepta prve države azila za okoliščine posameznega prosilca za mednarodno zaščito države članice upoštevajo člen 32(1).
In applying the concept of first country of asylum to the particular circumstances of an applicant for international protection Member States shall take into account Article 32 (1).
Prosilec ima pravico, da izpodbija uporabo koncepta prve države azila z utemeljitvijo, da ta država zanj ni varna.
The applicant shall be allowed to challenge the application of the concept of first country of asylum on the grounds that the first country of asylum in question is not safe in his or her particular case.
Da bi okrepili jamstva glede spoštovanje načela nevračanja, morajo države članice upoštevati merila glede varnosti, ki jih v zvezi z varnimi tretjimi državami določa člen 32(1).
In order to strengthen the safeguards against failure to respect the principle of non-refoulement, the Member States should apply the criteria for safe third countries laid down in Article 32(1).
Če člen 30 zagotavlja pravico do osebnega razgovora, bi moral tudi člen 31(2) nuditi prosilcu dejanske možnosti, da v svojem primeru izpodbija domnevo o varnosti, ki je predpisana v členu 32(2)(c) o uporabi koncepta varne tretje države.
Similarly, while Article 30 guarantees the right to a personal interview, Article 31(2) should also provide the applicant with an effective opportunity to refute the presumption of safety in his or her particular circumstances, as guaranteed in Article 32(2)(c) on the application of the safe third country concept.
Koncept varne tretje države
The safe third country concept
Države članice lahko uporabijo koncept varne tretje države samo, če so pristojni organi prepričani, da se z osebo, ki išče mednarodno zaščito , v zadevni tretji državi ravna v skladu z naslednjimi načeli:
Member States may apply the safe third country concept only where the competent authorities are satisfied that a person seeking international protection will be treated in accordance with the following principles in the third country concerned:
(a) življenje in svoboda nista ogroženi zaradi rase, vere, državljanstva, pripadnosti določeni družbeni skupini ali političnega prepričanja;
(a) life and liberty are not threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion;
(b) ni tveganja resne škode, kot je opredeljeno v [Direktivi …./../ES] [direktiva o zahtevanih pogojih];
(b) there is no risk of serious harm as defined in [Directive …./../EC] [the Qualification Directive];
(c) v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo se spoštuje načelo nevračanja;
(c) the principle of non-refoulement in accordance with the Geneva Convention is respected;
(d) spoštuje se prepoved odstranitve, ki bi kršila prepoved mučenja ter krutega, nečloveškega in ponižujočega ravnanja, kakor je določena v mednarodnem pravu; ter
(d) the prohibition of removal, in violation of the right to freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment as laid down in international law, is respected; and
(e) možnost zaprositi za status begunca ter, če je ugotovljeno, da je oseba res begunec, pridobiti zaščito v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo.
(e) the possibility exists to request refugee status and, if found to be a refugee, to receive protection in accordance with the Geneva Convention.
Uporaba koncepta varne tretje države je možna na podlagi pravil nacionalne zakonodaje, vključno:
The application of the safe third country concept shall be subject to rules laid down in national legislation, including:
(a) s pravili, ki zahtevajo zvezo med osebo, ki išče mednarodno zaščito , in zadevno tretjo državo, na podlagi katerih bi bilo smiselno, da ta oseba odide v to državo;
(a) rules requiring a connection between the person seeking international protection and the third country concerned on the basis of which it would be reasonable for that person to go to that country;
(b) z metodološkimi pravili, ki pristojnim organom omogočajo, da ugotovijo, ali lahko koncept varne tretje države uporabijo za posamezno državo ali v zvezi s posameznim prosilcem.
(b) rules on the methodology by which the competent authorities satisfy themselves that the safe third country concept may be applied to a particular country or to a particular applicant.
Takšna metodologija vključuje preučitev varnosti države od primera do primera za določenega prosilca in/ali nacionalne označitve zadevnih držav, ki se na splošno štejejo za varne;
Such methodology shall include case-by-case consideration of the safety of the country for a particular applicant and/or national designation of countries considered to be generally safe;
(c) s pravili, ki v skladu z mednarodnim pravom omogočajo posamično preučitev, ali je zadevna tretja država za določenega prosilca varna, in ki morajo prosilcu omogočati vsaj izpodbijanje uporabe koncepta varne tretje države zato, ker tretja država v okoliščinah, ki ga zadevajo, ni varna.
(c) rules in accordance with international law, allowing an individual examination of whether the third country concerned is safe for a particular applicant which, as a minimum, shall permit the applicant to challenge the application of the safe third country concept on the grounds that the third country is not safe in his/her particular circumstances.
Prosilcu se omogoči, da lahko izpodbija obstoj zveze med njim in tretjo državo v skladu s točko (a) .Pri izvajanju odločbe, ki temelji izključno na tem členu, države članice:
The applicant shall also be allowed to challenge the existence of a connection between him/her and the third country in accordance with point (a) .When implementing a decision solely based on this Article, Member States shall:
Pri izvajanju odločbe, ki temelji izključno na tem členu, države članice:
When implementing a decision solely based on this Article, Member States shall:
(a) o tem obvestijo prosilca; in
(a) inform the applicant accordingly; and
Kadar tretja država zadevnemu prosilcu za mednarodno zaščito ne dovoli vstopa na njeno ozemlje, države članice zagotovijo dostopnost postopka v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II.
Where the third country does not permit the applicant for international protection to enter its territory, Member States shall ensure that access to a procedure is given in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees described in Chapter II.
Države članice redno obveščajo Komisijo o državah, za katere se v skladu z določbami tega člena uporablja ta koncept.
Member States shall inform the Commission periodically of the countries to which this concept is applied in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
Nacionalna označitev tretjih držav za varne izvorne države
National designation of third countries as safe countries of origin
Države članice lahko ohranijo ali sprejmejo zakonodajo, ki v skladu s Prilogo II dopušča nacionalno označitev varnih izvornih držav za namene obravnavanja prošenj za mednarodno zaščito . .
Member States may retain or introduce legislation that allows, in accordance with Annex II, for the national designation of safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for international protection. .
Države članice zagotovijo redni pregled razmer v tretjih državah, označenih za varne v skladu s tem členom.
Member States shall ensure a regular review of the situation in third countries designated as safe in accordance with this Article.
Ocenjevanje, ali je država varna izvorna država v skladu s tem členom, temelji na različnih virih podatkov, vključujoč zlasti podatke iz drugih držav članic, Evropskega urada za podporo azilu , UNHCR, Sveta Evrope in drugih ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij.
The assessment of whether a country is a safe country of origin in accordance with this Article shall be based on a range of sources of information, including in particular information from other Member States, the European Asylum Support Office, the UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Države članice obveščajo Komisijo o državah, ki so v skladu s tem členom označene za varne izvorne države.
Member States shall notify to the Commission the countries that are designated as safe countries of origin in accordance with this Article.
Koncept varne izvorne države
The safe country of origin concept
Tretja država, ki je bila v skladu s to direktivo označena za varno izvorno državo, se lahko po individualnem obravnavanju prošnje šteje za določenega prosilca za varno izvorno državo samo, če:
A third country designated as a safe country of origin in accordance with this Directive may, after an individual examination of the application, be considered as a safe country of origin for a particular applicant only if:
(a) ima prosilec državljanstvo te države;
(a) he/she has the nationality of that country;
(b) je prosilec oseba brez državljanstva in je imel prej stalno prebivališče v tej državi;
(b) he/she is a stateless person and was formerly habitually resident in that country;
(c) ter če ni izkazal nikakršnih resnih razlogov, zaradi katerih bi se štelo, da ta država glede na njegove osebne okoliščine z ozirom na njegovo prošnjo za status begunca ali osebe, upravičene do subsidiarne zaščite, v skladu z [Direktivo …./../ES] [direktiva o zahtevanih pogojih] ni varna izvorna država.
(c) and he/she has not submitted any serious grounds for considering the country not to be a safe country of origin in his/her particular circumstances and in terms of his/her qualification as a refugee or a person eligible for subsidiary protection in accordance with [Directive …./../EC] [the Qualification Directive] .
Države članice v nacionalni zakonodaji določijo nadaljnja pravila in podrobnosti o načinu uporabe koncepta varne izvorne države.
Member States shall lay down in national legislation further rules and modalities for the application of the safe country of origin concept.
Kadar oseba, ki je zaprosila za mednarodno zaščito v državi članici, poda naknadne navedbe ali vloži naknadno prošnjo v isti državi članici, ta država članica obravnava te naknadne navedbe ali elemente naknadne prošnje v okviru obravnavanja predhodne prošnje ali v okviru preizkusa pravnega sredstva ali odločanja o pravnem sredstvu zoper odločbo, če lahko pristojni organi v teh postopkih upoštevajo in obravnavajo vse elemente naknadnih navedb ali naknadnih prošenj.
Where a person who has applied for international protection in a Member State makes further representations or a subsequent application in the same Member State, that Member State shall examine these further representations or the elements of the subsequent application in the framework of the examination of the previous application or in the framework of the examination of the decision under review or appeal, insofar as the competent authorities can take into account and consider all the elements underlying the further representations or subsequent application within this framework.
Kadar oseba, ki je zaprosila za mednarodno zaščito v državi članici, poda naknadne navedbe ali vloži naknadno prošnjo v isti državi članici, ta država članica obravnava te naknadne navedbe ali elemente naknadne prošnje v okviru obravnavanja predhodne prošnje ali v okviru preizkusa pravnega sredstva ali odločanja o pravnem sredstvu zoper odločbo, če lahko organ za presojo v teh postopkih upošteva in obravnava vse elemente naknadnih navedb ali naknadnih prošenj.
Where a person who has applied for international protection in a Member State makes further representations or a subsequent application in the same Member State, that Member State shall examine these further representations or the elements of the subsequent application in the framework of the examination of the previous application or in the framework of the examination of the decision under review or appeal, insofar as the determining authority can take into account and consider all the elements underlying the further representations or subsequent application within this framework.
Za ovrednotenje vseh dokumentov, s katerimi so podprte nove izjave ali naknadne prošnje, je pristojen le organ za presojo.
Only the determining authority is competent to assess all the elements underlying the further representations or subsequent application.
Ta pojasnitev naj bi še dodatno pripomogla k racionalizaciji postopka in izboljšanju kakovosti procesa odločanja.
This clarification will also help to streamline the procedure and improve the quality of the decision-making process.
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da nadaljujejo z obravnavanjem samo, če zadevni prosilec brez svoje krivde v predhodnem postopku ni mogel uveljaviti okoliščin iz odstavkov 3, 4 in 5 tega člena, zlasti z uveljavljanjem svoje pravice do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva v skladu s členom 41.
Member States may decide to further examine the application only if the applicant concerned was, through no fault of his/her own, incapable of asserting the situations set forth in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of this Article in the previous procedure, in particular by exercising his/her right to an effective remedy pursuant to Article 41.
Države članice ne bi smele sistematično zavračati pregledov naknadnih prošenj z izgovorom, da bi lahko prosilec nove elemente ali dejstva izpostavil v teku predhodnega postopka ali v postopku pritožbe.
The Member States should not systematically refuse to examine a subsequent application on the pretext that the applicant could have brought forth the new elements or facts during the previous procedure or related appeal.
Takšen avtomatizem bi lahko vodil v kršitev načela nevračanja.
An automatic refusal of this kind could result in a breach of the principle of non-refoulement.
(a) dopustnosti prošenj, ki so bile vložene na teh krajih, in/ali
(a) the admissibility of an application made at such locations; and/or
(a) dopustnosti prošenj v smislu člena 29 , ki so bile vložene na teh krajih, in/ali
(a) the admissibility of an application , within the meaning of Article 29, made at such locations; and/or
Predlog Komisije potrjuje, da bi morali postopki spoštovati temelja načela in jamstva iz drugega poglavja.
The Commission proposal reaffirms that border procedures must also comply with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se v postopkih iz odstavka 1 odloči v razumnem roku.
Member States shall ensure that a decision in the framework of the procedures provided for in paragraph 1 is taken within a reasonable time.
Če ni odločeno v štirih tednih, se prosilcu dovoli vstop na ozemlje države članice, da bi se njegova prošnja obravnavala v skladu z ostalimi določbami te direktive.
When a decision has not been taken within four weeks, the applicant shall be granted entry to the territory of the Member State in order for his/her application to be processed in accordance with the other provisions of this Directive.
Zadrževanje prosilcev na mejah držav članic ali tranzitnih območjih je primerljivo s pridržanjem iz člena 22.
The holding of applicants at Member States’ borders or transit zones is equivalent to placing them in detention, as referred to in Article 22.
Zadrževanje prosilcev na mejah držav članic ali tranzitnih območjih je primerljivo s pridržanjem v smislu člena 5(1)(f) Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin in sodno prakso sodišča, pristojnega za njeno izvajanje.
Holding applicants at Member States’ borders or transit zones is equivalent to placing them in detention under the terms of Article 5(1)(f) of the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the case law of the court responsible for its application.
Nasprotno pa bi moralo zadrževanje prosilcev na mejah držav članic ali tranzitnih območjih ustrezati zahtevam iz predloga Komisije o standardih za sprejem (KOM(2008) 815 končno).
The arrangements for holding applicants at Member States’ frontiers or transit zones should therefore satisfy the requirements laid down in this area in the Commission proposal on reception conditions (COM(2008) 815 final).
Koncept evropske varne tretje države
The European safe third countries concept
Koncept varne tretje države
The safe third countries concept
Države članice lahko predvidijo, da se, kadar pristojni organ na podlagi dejstev ugotovi, da prosilec poskuša nezakonito vstopiti ali da je nezakonito vstopil na ozemlje države članice iz varne tretje države iz odstavka 2, ne opravi obravnavanje ali ne opravi celovito obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito in varnosti prosilca glede na njegove osebne okoliščine, kot je navedeno v Poglavju II.
Member States may provide that no, or no full, examination of the asylum application and of the safety of the applicant in his/her particular circumstances as described in Chapter II, shall take place in cases where a competent authority has established, on the basis of the facts, that the applicant for international protection is seeking to enter or has entered illegally into its territory from a safe third country according to paragraph 2.
Za namene odstavka 1 se tretja država lahko šteje za varno tretjo državo samo, če:
A third country can only be considered as a safe third country for the purposes of paragraph 1 where:
Tretja država se lahko šteje za varno tretjo državo samo, če se bo z osebo, ki išče mednarodno zaščito, v zadevni tretji državi ravnalo v skladu z naslednjimi načeli in pogoji :
A third country can only be considered as a safe third country where a person seeking international protection will be treated in accordance with the following principles and conditions in the third country concerned :
(a) je ratificirala in spoštuje določbe Ženevske konvencije brez kakršnih koli geografskih omejitev;
(a) it has ratified and observes the provisions of the Geneva Convention without any geographical limitations ;
(b) ima z zakonom predpisan azilni postopek; in
(b) it has in place an asylum procedure prescribed by law; and
(c) je ratificirala Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter spoštuje njene določbe, vključno s standardi za učinkovita pravna sredstva.
(c) it has ratified the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and observes its provisions, including the standards relating to effective remedies.
(d) spoštuje se prepoved odstranitve, ki bi kršila prepoved mučenja ter krutega, nečloveškega in ponižujočega ravnanja, kakor je določena v mednarodnem pravu;
( d) the prohibition of removal, in violation of the right to freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment as laid down in international law, is respected;
(f) je ratificirala in spoštuje določbe Ženevske konvencije brez kakršnih koli geografskih omejitev;
( f) it has ratified and observes the provisions of the Geneva Convention without any geographical limitations;
(g) ima z zakonom predpisan azilni postopek; ter
( g) it has in place an asylum procedure prescribed by law; and
(h) sta jo za varno označila Svet in Parlament v skladu z odstavkom 2.
( h) it has been so designated by the Council and the Parliament in accordance with paragraph 2.
Evropski parlament in Svet v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom sprejme ali spremeni skupen seznam tretjih držav, ki se štejejo za varne tretje države za namene odstavka 1.
The European Parliament and the Council shall, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, adopt or amend a common list of third countries that shall be regarded as safe third countries for the purposes of paragraph 1.
Zadevne države članice v nacionalnem pravu v skladu z načelom nevračanja določijo načine izvajanja določb odstavka 1 in posledice odločb na podlagi teh določb, vključno z določitvijo izjem pri izvajanju tega člena zaradi humanitarnih ali političnih razlogov ali razlogov v zvezi z mednarodnim javnim pravom .
The Member States concerned shall lay down in national law the modalities for implementing the provisions of paragraph 1 and the consequences of decisions pursuant to those provisions in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, including providing for exceptions from the application of this Article for humanitarian or political reasons or for reasons of public international law.
Zadevne države članice v nacionalnem pravu v skladu z načelom nevračanja določijo načine izvajanja določb odstavka 1 in pravila, ki zahtevajo:
The Member States concerned shall lay down in national law the modalities for implementing the provisions of paragraph 1 and rules requiring:
(a) zvezo med osebo, ki išče mednarodno zaščito, in zadevno tretjo državo, na podlagi katerih bi bilo smiselno, da ta oseba odide v to državo;
(a) a connection between the person seeking international protection and the third country concerned on the basis of which it would be reasonable for that person to go to that country;
(b) metodologijo, s katero pristojni organi jamčijo, da se koncept varne tretje države lahko uporablja za določeno državo ali za določenega prosilca.
(b) methodology by which the competent authorities satisfy themselves that the safe third country concept may be applied to a particular country or to a particular applicant.
Takšna metodologija vključuje preučitev varnosti države od primera do primera za določenega prosilca;
Such methodology shall include case-by-case consideration of the safety of the country for a particular applicant;
(c) pravila, ki v skladu z mednarodnim pravom omogočajo posamično preučitev, ali je zadevna tretja država za določenega prosilca varna, in ki prosilcu omogočajo vsaj izpodbijanje uporabe koncepta varne tretje države zato, ker tretja država v okoliščinah, ki ga zadevajo, ni varna.
(c) rules in accordance with international law, allowing an individual examination of whether the third country concerned is safe for a particular applicant which, as a minimum, shall permit the applicant to challenge the application of the safe third country concept on the grounds that the third country is not safe in his/her particular circumstances.
Prosilcu se omogoči, da lahko izpodbija obstoj zveze med njim in tretjo državo v skladu s točko (a).
The applicant shall also be allowed to challenge the existence of a connection between him/her and the third country in accordance with point (a)
Pri izvajanju odločbe, ki temelji izključno na tem členu, države članice :
When implementing a decision solely based on this Article, the Member States concerned shall :
Pri izvajanju odločbe, ki izključno na tem členu, države članice o tem obvestijo prosilca .
When implementing a decision based on this Article, the Member States concerned shall inform the applicant accordingly
(a) o tem obvestijo prosilca ; ter
(a) inform the applicant accordingly ; and
(b) posredujejo prosilcu dokument, s katerim oblastem tretje države v jeziku te države sporočajo, da prošnja vsebinsko ni bila obravnavana.
(b) provide him/her with a document informing the authorities of the third country, in the language of that country, that the application has not been examined in substance .
Kadar varna tretja država prosilca za azil ne sprejme ponovno, države članice zagotovijo dostopnost postopka v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II.
Where the safe third country does not re-admit the applicant for asylum, Member States shall ensure that access to a procedure is given in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees described in Chapter II.
Države članice ne določijo državnih seznamov varnih izvornih držav ali državnih seznamov varnih tretjih držav.
Member States shall not designate national lists of safe countries of origin or na tional lists of safe third countries.