natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar je to za upnika zaradi različnih postopkov in pravnih posledic poleg jezikovne problematike in časovnega dejavnika dejansko težko izvedljivo in drago.
In reality, however, because of the different procedures and legal consequences, to say nothing of language problems and the time factor, such measures are difficult and expensive for creditors to enforce.
Uredba Bruselj I te zadeve ne obravnava ali pa jo obravnava nepopolno.
The ‘Brussels I’ Regulation does not address this problem, or at any rate not fully.
Tudi prilagajanje obstoječih nacionalnih sistemov z usklajevanjem ne prispeva k doseganju navedenega cilja, ker so pravni sistemi tako različni, da je to skoraj nemogoče doseči.
Furthermore, the desired aim would probably not be achieved by bringing existing national rules more closely into line through harmonisation, because the legal systems are so different that the task would be virtually impossible.
Zato je treba v EU uvesti neodvisen dodatni postopek, ki bi se uporabljal poleg nacionalnih sistemov.
That is why an independent EU-wide procedure should be introduced alongside the national arrangements.
Veljal bi le za čezmejne postopke, pri čemer ne bi zadeval drugih premoženjskih vrednosti razen bančnih računov.
It should apply only to cross-border procedures and be confined to bank deposits, excluding other assets.
To bi namesto dokončne poravnave terjatev upnika pomenilo le njegovo zavarovanje, tj. da mu denar ne bi bil izplačan.
It would be intended solely to freeze money for the benefit of a creditor and not to give him ultimate satisfaction, that is to say, it would now allow money to be paid out.
Člen 65(c) Pogodbe ES bi bil ustrezna pravna podlaga.
Article 65(c) TEC might be an appropriate legal basis.
Zaradi neizbežnega sodnega uveljavljanja zahtevkov, bi lahko dolžnik služil denar skrivno.
Faced with the threat that his creditor’s claim could be enforced through the courts, a debtor might be tempted to move his money out of the way.
Zato morajo cilji iz zelene knjige upniku vedno omogočati, da zahteva zaplembo računa, in sicer še pred začetkom pravnega postopka o glavnih dejstvih postopka.
Consequently, bearing in mind the objective of the Green Paper, a creditor should be allowed to apply for attachment at any time, and that includes before the main proceedings have started.
Upnik mora sodišče v skrajšanem postopku prepričati o upravičenosti zahtevka in nujnosti za odobritev naloga za zaplembo.
The creditor should be called upon to persuade the court, in a summary procedure, that he has a claim and that an attachment order is required urgently.
Nujnost je treba vključiti, kadar obstaja razlog za bojazen, da bi bila prisilna izvršba preprečena ali zelo zapletena.
An order should be treated as a matter of urgency if there is reason to fear that enforcement of the claim might otherwise be prevented or made considerably more difficult.
Ker zadeva to pospešeni postopek, je treba upoštevati obrazložitve, npr. sodno izjavo skupaj z javnimi listinami ali drugimi pisnimi izjavami.
Given that what is involved is a summary procedure, a statutory declaration, as well as certificates or other written declarations, could be regarded as credible evidence.
V takšnem primeru bi bilo treba določiti, da bo lažna sodna izjava imela kazenskopravne posledice.
In such cases it would have to be stipulated that making a false statutory declaration would be a punishable offence.
Neupravičena zaplemba lahko dolžniku zelo škoduje, ker lahko ogrozi celo njegov obstoj, in zmanjša zaupanje v evropsko zakonodajo.
Unjustified attachment could entail serious consequences for a debtor, possibly even ruining his livelihood, and undermine confidence in the European legal system.
Zato je treba varstvu dolžnika posvetiti posebno pozornost, npr. z jamstvom upnika, pravico do ugovora, omejitvijo višine zaplembe, obveznostjo upnika, da začne v določenem roku glavni postopek itd.
That is why particular attention needs to be focused on ways of protecting the debtor, for example through security to be provided by the creditor, a right to contest the attachment, a limit on the attachable amount, an obligation for the creditor to institute the main proceedings within a fixed time limit, and so on.
Po mnenju poročevalca se je treba odpovedati uvedbi enotnih zneskov, izvzetih iz izvršbe, dolžnik pa mora uveljavljati dejanske nacionalne zneske, izvzete iz izvršbe;
The rapporteur does not believe that a standard attachment exemption level should be laid down on an EU-wide basis: it should be up to the debtor to invoke the respective national limit governing non-attachable amounts.
Do zaplembe načeloma ne sme priti v primeru imenskega računa, kadar lastnik ni dolžnik, ampak je dolžnik npr. notar ali odvetnik.
Attachment should, as a matter of principle, be ruled out if the account concerned is a trust account and the account holder is not the debtor himself, but, say, a notary or lawyer.
Poleg obravnavanih težav obstajajo več dodatnih in zapletenih vprašanj, npr. pristojnost sodišča, podrobnosti v zvezi s postopkom izvrševanja sodnih odločb ali plačilo banki, ki jih je treba še preučiti, ter materialnopravni vidiki, kot je razvrstitev zaplemb.
In addition to the problems discussed above, there are a number of individual vexed questions, for example jurisdiction, details of the enforcement procedure, or payment of fees to banks, that still require thorough examination, as do practical legal considerations such as ranking of creditors for attachment purposes.
V tem poročilu se ta vprašanja ne bodo podrobneje obravnavala, ampak se bodo preučila na prihodnjih obravnavah.
Rather than probing further at this stage, these points should be left for future discussions.
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. meni, da mora biti predlog zlasti oblikovan tako, da nacionalni postopki ne bodo v nasprotju s postopkom Skupnosti; v zvezi s tem meni, da bi bilo bolje sprejeti metodo usklajevanja, kar pa zdaj ni izvedljivo, drug najboljši način za ureditev zaplembe bančnih računov pa je neodvisen postopek;
Takes the view, first of all, that the proposal should be formulated in a way that will avoid conflict between national and Community procedures; considers in this respect that it would be better to adopt the harmonisation method but that, since that method does not seem to be feasible at present, the next best way of regulating the attachment of bank accounts is the self-standing procedure;
5. meni, da mora ustrezni nalog omejiti znesek, ki se zamrzne, na zahtevan znesek, obresti in razumne stroške, ker zamrznitev bančnega računa lahko vpliva na druge upnike in tudi na finančne dejavnosti tožene stranke;
Is of the opinion that, since the freezing of a bank account can affect other creditors and, of course, the financial activities of the respondent, the relevant order should limit the amount to be frozen to the amount claimed plus interest and reasonable costs;
7. v primeru, da tožena stranka nasprotuje nalogu za zaplembo bančnih računov ali vloži prošnjo za preklic takšnega naloga, bi se morala, kar zadeva toženo stranko, uporabljati ista načela, kot se uporabljajo pri izdaji naloga, vključno z nujnostjo;
In the event of opposition to an order of attachment of bank accounts or of an application for annulment of such an order by the respondent, the same principles applicable to the issue of the order, including that of urgency, should apply as far as the respondent is concerned;
9. meni, da morajo pristojnost za izdajo naloga za zaplembo imeti sodišča države običajnega ali stalnega prebivališča tožene stranke ali države, v kateri je bil vložen zahtevek ali v kateri se nahaja bančni račun, ter da se tak nalog lahko uporabi kot orodje exequatur za izvrševanje sodnih odločb namesto običajnega postopka exequatur ;
Considers that jurisdiction to make an attachment order should vest in the courts of the country of habitual residence or domicile of the respondent or of the country in which the claim arose or in which the bank account is situated, and that such an order could be used as an exequatur tool for the enforcement of a judgment in lieu of the ordinary exequatur procedure;
Zelena knjiga o izboljšanju učinkovitosti izvrševanja sodnih odločb v Evropski uniji: zaplemba bančnih računov
Green Paper on improving the efficiency of the enforcement of judgments in the European Union: the attachment of bank accounts
3. za nalog je nujna utemeljitev, kot je nevarnost razpršitve premoženja; obstajati morajo zaščitni ukrepi, ki onemogočijo, da nalogi zajamejo več računov kot je treba;
Justification for an order is necessary, such as risk of dissipation of assets; there should be safeguards to prevent orders from covering more accounts than is necessary;
6. odgovornost upnika je treba jasno opredeliti v primerih neprimernega obnašanja do dolžnika, da se tako zaščiti pravice slednjega pred začetkom veljave naloga za zaplembo in med njegovo veljavo;
To safeguard the rights of the debtor before and while the attachment order is in force, the responsibility of the creditor must be clearly delimited in cases of improper behaviour against the debtor;
Zelena knjiga o izboljšanju učinkovitosti izvrševanja sodnih odločb v Evropski uniji: zaplemba bančnih računov
Green paper on improving the efficiency of the enforcement of judgments in the European Union: the attachment of bank accounts
o evropskem soglasju glede humanitarne pomoči
on a European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................17
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................17
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................23
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................23
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu „K evropskemu soglasju glede humanitarne pomoči“ ( KOM(2007)0317 )
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled 'Towards a European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid' ( COM(2007)0317 )
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije „Poročilo o rezultatih posvetovanja glede soglasja o evropski politiki za humanitarno pomoč“ ( SEC(2007)0782 ),
– having regard to the Commission Staff Working Document entitled 'Report on the results of the consultation on a consensus on European Humanitarian Aid Policy' ( SEC(2007)0782 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije „Poročilo o odzivih na krize – Demokratična republika Kongo, Pakistan, Libanon in Burma/Mjanmar“ ( SEC(2007)0781 ),
– having regard to the Commission Staff Working Document entitled 'Report on responses to crises – DRC, Pakistan, Lebanon and Burma/Myanmar' ( SEC(2007)0781 ),
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ES, zlasti njenega člena 179,
– having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 179 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta z zasedanja 21. in 22. junija 2007 v Bruslju, na katerem so določili mandat medvladne konference,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council held in Brussels on 21 and 22 June 2007 setting out the mandate for the Intergovernmental Conference,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1257/96 z dne 20. junija 1996 o humanitarni pomoči
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid
– ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2001/792/ES, Euratom, z dne 23. oktobra 2001 o vzpostavitvi mehanizma Skupnosti za pospeševanje okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju civilne zaščite
– having regard to Council Decision 2001/792/EC Euratom of 23 October 2001 establishing a Community mechanism to facilitate reinforced cooperation in civil protection assistance interventions
– ob upoštevanju ocene Generalnega direktorata Evropske komisije za humanitarno pomoč (GD ECHO) za obdobje 2000–2005 (2006),
– having regard to the Evaluation of the European Commission's Directorate General for Humanitarian Aid (DG ECHO) 2000 - 2005 (2006),
– ob upoštevanju medsebojnega strokovnega pregleda politike in programov razvojnega sodelovanja Evropske skupnosti (2007), ki ga je izvedel Odbor za razvojno pomoč Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD/DAC),
– having regard to the Peer Review of the Development Cooperation Policies and Programmes of the European Community (2007) by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD/DAC),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Michela Barnierja „Za evropsko silo za civilno zaščito: pomoč Evrope“, objavljenega maja 2006,
– having regard to the report by Michel Barnier entitled 'For a European civil protection force: europe aid', published in May 2006,
– ob upoštevanju smernic Evropske unije z dne 23. decembra 2005 o spodbujanju spoštovanja mednarodnega humanitarnega prava
– having regard to the European Union Guidelines on promoting compliance with international humanitarian law of 23 December 2005 (IHL)
– ob upoštevanju Skupne izjave Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic v okviru Sveta ter Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije o razvojni politiki Evropske unije „Evropsko soglasje“
– having regard to the Joint statement by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European Union Development Policy 'The European Consensus'
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Evropska unija in Združeni narodi: izbira multilateralizma“
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled 'The European Union and the United Nations: The choice for multilateralism'
(KOM (2003)0526). , v katerem poziva k vsestranski krepitev in zbliževanju odnosov med EU in Združenih narodov na podlagi sistematičnega političnega dialoga, večjega sodelovanja na terenu, boljšega obvladovanja in preprečevanja kriz ter strateškega partnerstva med Komisijo in izbranimi agencijami Združenih narodov;
( COM(2003)0526 ). , calling for a comprehensive strengthening and mainstreaming of EU-UN relations, through systematic policy dialogue, greater cooperation in the field, better crisis management and prevention, and strategic partnerships between the Commission and selected UN organisations,
– ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije človekovih pravic, ki jo je generalna skupščina Združenih narodov sprejela 10. decembra 1948,
– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1948,
– ob upoštevanju ženevskih konvencij iz leta 1949 in njihovih dodatnih protokolov iz leta 1977,
– having regard to the 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols of 1977,
– ob upoštevanju konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah in izbirnega protokola glede udeležbe otrok v oboroženih spopadih, ki ga je generalna skupščina sprejela 20. novembra 1989;
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the optional protocol thereto on the involvement of children in armed conflict, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 20 November 1989,
– ob upoštevanju konvencije o pomoči v hrani, podpisani v Londonu 13. aprila 1999, s katero se je Skupnost zavezala, da bo zagotavljala nujno pomoč v hrani in se odzivala na druge potrebe po hrani v državah v razvoju
– having regard to the Food Aid Convention signed in London on 13 April 1999 establishing a Community commitment to respond to emergency food situations and other food needs of developing countries
UL L 163, 4.7.2000, str.
OJ L 163, 4.7.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju načel in dobre prakse človekoljubnega donatorstva (pobuda GHD) z dne 17. junija 2003,
– having regard to the Principles and Good Practice of Humanitarian Donorship (GHD) of 17 June 2003,
– ob upoštevanju kodeksa ravnanja Rdečega križa in Rdečega polmeseca ter nevladnih organizacij v programih za odzive na nesreče iz leta 1994,
– having regard to the Code of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs in Disaster Response Programmes of 1994,
– ob upoštevanju humanitarne listine SPHERE in minimalnih standardov v odzivih na nesreče, revidirane leta 2004 ,
- having regard to the Sphere Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, revised in 2004,
– ob upoštevanju načel partnerstva svetovne platforme za humanitarno pomoč, sprejetih 12. julija 2007,
– having regard to the Principles of Partnership of the Global Humanitarian Platform of 12 July 2007,
– ob upoštevanju smernic o uporabi sredstev vojaške in civilne obrambe za podporo humanitarnim dejavnostim Združenih narodov pri naravnih nesrečah (smernice iz Osla), ki so bile pregledane 27. novembra 2006,
– having regard to the Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defence Assets to support United Nations Humanitarian Activities in Natural Disasters (the Oslo Guidelines), revised on 27 November 2006,
– ob upoštevanju smernic o uporabi sredstev vojaške in civilne obrambe za podporo humanitarnim dejavnostim Združenih narodov v zapletenih izrednih razmerah (smernice MCDA), sprejetih marca 2003,
– having regard to the Guidelines on The Use of Military and Civil Defence Assets To Support United Nations Humanitarian Activities in Complex Emergencies (the MCDA Guidelines) of March 2003,
– ob upoštevanju hjoškega akcijskega okvira, sprejetega na svetovni konferenci o zmanjšanju nesreč od 18. do 22. januarja 2005 v Kobeju (prefektura Hjogo) na Japonskem,
– having regard to the Hyogo Framework for Action, adopted at the World Conference on Disaster Reduction held in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan on 18-22 January 2005,
– ob upoštevanju poročila „Odgovornost za zaščito“, ki ga je Mednarodna komisija za posredovanje in državno suverenost sprejela decembra 2001,
– having regard to the Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty entitled 'The responsibility to protect' of December 2001,
– ob upoštevanju poročila „Varnejši svet: naša skupna odgovornost“, ki ga je sprejel odbor na visoki ravni o grožnjah, izzivih in spremembah 1. decembra 2004,
– having regard to the report entitled 'A more secure world: our shared responsibility' by the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change of 1 December 2004,
– ob upoštevanju poročila „V večji svobodi: v smeri razvoja, varnosti in človekovih pravic za vse“ generalnega sekretarja Združenih narodov z dne 21. marca 2005,
– having regard to the report entitled 'In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all' by the Secretary-General of the UN of 21 March 2005,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije generalne skupščine Združenih narodov št. 60/1 z dne 24. oktobra 2005, ki potrjuje, da je vsaka država odgovorna za zaščito svojih narodov pred genocidom, vojnimi zločini, etničnim čiščenjem in zločini proti človeštvu ter da je mednarodna skupnost odgovorna za pomoč pri tej zaščiti, in mednarodno skupnost zavezuje k obravnavanju in opredelitvi pojma varnosti ljudi,
– having regard to UN General Assembly resolution 60/1 of 24 October 2005 confirming each State's responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, and the international community's responsibility to help to protect, as well as committing the international community to discussing and defining the notion of human security,
– ob upoštevanju izjave in akcijskega okvira s Fribourškega foruma v Švici 15. in 16. junija 2000,
– having regard to the Communiqué and Framework for Action of the Fribourg Forum, Switzerland, 15-16 June 2000,
– ob upoštevanju pregleda humanitarnega odziva, ki ga je avgusta 2005 objavil Urad Združenih narodov za usklajevanje humanitarnih dejavnosti,
– having regard to the Humanitarian Response Review, published by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in August 2005,
– ob upoštevanju svojih predhodnih resolucij o dostavi humanitarne pomoči v tretjih državah,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the delivery of humanitarian aid in third countries,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 5. februarja 2002 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o usklajevanju pomoči, sanacije in razvoja – ocena
– having regard to its resolution of 5 February 2002 on the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on Linking relief, rehabilitation and development – an assessment
UL C 284E, 21.11.2002, str.
OJ C 284E, 21.11.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2002 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu „Gradimo učinkovito partnerstvo z Združenimi narodi na področju razvoja in humanitarnih dejavnosti“
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2002 on the Commission Communication to the Council and the European Parliament entitled 'Building an effective partnership with the United Nations in the fields of Development and Humanitarian Affairs'
UL C 180E, 31.7.2003, str.
OJ C 180E, 31.7.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 14. januarja 2003 o letnem poročilu Komisije o humanitarni pomoči za leto 2000
– having regard to its resolution of 14 January 2003 on the Commission's Annual Report on humanitarian aid 2000
UL C 38E, 12.2.2004, str.
OJ C 38E, 12.2.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. februarja 2002 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o oceni in prihodnosti humanitarnih dejavnosti Skupnosti (člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 1257/96)
– having regard to its resolution of 5 September 2000 on the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: assessment and future of Community humanitarian activities (Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/96)
UL C 135, 7.5.2001, str.
OJ C 135, 7.5.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o predlogu odločbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi mehanizma Skupnosti na področju civilne zaščite (prenova)
– having regard to its resolution of 24 October 2006 on the proposal for a Council decision establishing a Community civil protection mechanism (recast)
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0434 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0434 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. junija 2005 o reformi Združenih narodov
– having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2005 on the reform of the United Nations
UL C 124, 25.5.2006, str.
OJ C 124, 25.5.2006, p.549. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6–0372/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0372/2007 ),
Evropsko soglasje glede humanitarne pomoči
The European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid
3. meni, da je treba v soglasju pojasniti, kako je mogoče najbolje združiti in uskladiti različna sredstva Skupnosti in držav članic ob upoštevanju njihovih primerjalnih prednosti;
Considers that the Consensus should clarify how the different assets of the EC and the Member States can best be combined and coordinated, in the light of their respective comparative advantages;
DEL I: Vizija EU glede Humanitarne Pomoči
PART I: The EU Vision of Humanitarian Aid
a) Skupni cilji
a) Common objectives
7. poudarja, da mora biti cilj humanitarne pomoči omogočanje samorazvoja in samooskrbe držav oziroma regij prejemnic pomoči, ne pa njihova prevelika odvisnost od dodatne pomoči ali zunanje podpore;
Stresses that humanitarian aid must take account of self-development and self-sufficiency and must not be geared towards making the countries or regions to which the aid is given too dependent on further aid or external assistance;
b) Skupne vrednote, načela in dobra praksa
b) Common values, principles and good practice
– načelo človekoljubnosti, kar pomeni, da je v središču pozornosti reševanje človeških življenj in lajšanje trpljenja, kjerkoli se pojavi;
- the principle of humanity, meaning the centrality of saving human lives and alleviating suffering wherever it is found;