natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju predloga za uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, centralnih nasprotnih strankah in repozitorijih sklenjenih poslov (KOM(2010) 0484/5),
– having regard to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (COM(2010) 0484/5),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o bančnih reševalnih skladih ( KOM(2010)0254 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on Bank Resolution Funds (COM (2010)0254),
– ob upoštevanju izjave G-20 s 15. novembra 2008 v Washingtonu, izjave G-20 z 2. aprila 2009 v Londonu in izjave voditeljev držav, ki so se udeležili vrha G-20 s 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu,
– having regard to the G20 Declaration issued on 15 November 2008 in Washington, the G20 Declaration issued on 2 April 2009 in London and the Leaders' Statement of the G20 Summit of 25 September 2009 in Pittsburgh,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Mednarodnega denarnega sklada za leto 2010 skupini držav G-20 o obdavčitvi finančnega sektorja,
– having regard to the 2010 IMF report to the G20 on Financial Sector Taxation,
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta svetovalnega odbora sindikatov pri OECD „Parametri davka na finančne transakcije in razkorak med viri globalnih javnih dobrin, kot jih opredeljuje OECD, 2010–2020“ z dne 15. februarja 2010,
– having regard to the OECD Trade Union Advisory Committee paper entitled 'The parameters of a financial transaction tax and the OECD global public good resource gap, 2010-2020' of 15 February 2010,
– ob upoštevanju poročila OECD za leto 2010 z naslovom Slon v sobi: potreba po obravnavanju dejavnosti bank,
– having regard to the 2010 OECD report entitled 'The elephant in the room: the need to deal with what banks do',
– ob upoštevanju študije avstrijskega inštituta za ekonomske raziskave (WIFO) „Splošni davek na finančne transakcije: motivi, prihodki, izvedljivost in učinki“ iz marca 2008,
– having regard to the Austrian Economic Research Institute (WIFO) study entitled 'A General Financial Transaction Tax: Motives, Revenues, Feasibility and Effects' of March 2008,
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Fundacije za evropske progresivne študije „Davki na finančne transakcije: nujni, izvedljivi in zaželeni“ iz marca 2010,
– having regard to the Foundation for European Progressive Studies paper entitled 'Financial Transaction Taxes: Necessary, Feasible and Desirable' of March 2010,
– ob upoštevanju študije Centra za raziskave ekonomske politike (CEPR) „Koristi davka na finančne transakcije“ iz decembra 2008,
– having regard to the Centre for Economic Policy Research study entitled 'Benefits of a Financial Transactions Tax' of December 2008,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z naslovom „Statistični pregled državnih pomoči – Poročilo o nedavnih dogajanjih glede krizne pomoči finančnemu sektorju“ ( KOM(2010)0255 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission - State Aid Scoreboard - Report on recent developments on crisis aid to the financial sector ( COM(2010)0255 ),
– ob upoštevanju študije organizacije Notre Europe z naslovom „Unija s čedalje manj ogljikovega dioksida?
– having regard to the Notre Europe study entitled 'An ever less carbonated Union?
Za boljšo evropsko obdavčitev proti podnebnim spremembam“,
Towards a better European Taxation against climate change',
– ob upoštevanju sklepnega dokumenta plenarnega zasedanja Generalne skupščine Organizacije združenih narodov na visoki ravni „Izpolnitev obljube: združeni v doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja“ iz septembra 2010,
– having regard to the outcome document of the High-level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly of the United Nations ‘Keeping the promise: united to achieve the Millennium Development Goals’ of September 2010,
– ob upoštevanju izjave s sedmega plenarnega zasedanja vodilne skupine za inovativno financiranje razvoja v Santiagu januarja 2010,
– having regard to the Declaration issued at the Seventh Plenary Meeting of the Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development held in Santiago in January 2010,
– ob upoštevanju poročila 2010 odbora strokovnjakov v projektni skupini za mednarodne finančne transakcije za razvoj z naslovom „Globalizacija solidarnosti: argumenti za finančne dajatve“,
– having regard to the 2010 Report of the Committee of Experts to the Taskforce on International Financial Transactions for Development 'Globalising Solidarity: The Case for Financial Levies',
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj ter Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0036/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7‑0036/2011 ),
A. ker je doslej najhujša svetovna finančna in gospodarska kriza leta 2007 razkrila precejšnje pomanjkljivosti regulativnega in nadzornega okvira svetovnega finančnega sistema, ki ga je mogoče opisati kot skupek nereguliranih finančnih trgov, preveč zapletenih proizvodov in nepreglednih pristojnosti; ker Evropa potrebuje preglednejše in učinkovitejše finančne trge,
A. whereas the unprecedented global financial and economic crisis in 2007 revealed significant dysfunctions in the regulatory and supervisory framework of the global financial system, which can be described as the combination of unregulated financial markets, overly complex products and non-transparent jurisdictions; whereas Europe needs more transparent and efficient financial markets,
B. ker so prosti trgi temelj ustvarjanja bogastva po vsem svetu ter ker tržno gospodarstvo in prosta trgovina ustvarjata bogastvo in rešujeta ljudi iz revščine,
B. whereas free markets are the foundation of wealth creation worldwide, and whereas market economies and free trade create wealth and lift people out of poverty,
C. ker nenavaden porast finančnih transakcij v svetovnem gospodarstvu v zadnjih desetih letih – leta 2007 je bil njihov obseg 73,5-krat večji od nominalnega svetovnega BDP, predvsem zaradi razcveta na trgu izvedenih finančnih instrumentov – prikazuje čedalje večji razkorak med finančnimi transakcijami in potrebami realnega gospodarstva,
C. whereas the spectacular rise in the volume of financial transactions in the global economy within the last decade – a volume which in 2007 reached a level 73.5 times higher than nominal world GDP, mainly owing to the boom on the derivatives market - illustrates the growing disconnection between financial transactions and the needs of the real economy,
D. ker je finančni trg močno odvisen od vzorcev trgovanja, kot je visokofrekvenčno trgovanje, katerih cilj je predvsem kratkoročni dobiček in ki so izpostavljeni pretiranemu finančnemu vzvodu, enemu izmed glavnih vzrokov za finančno krizo; ker je bila posledica tega prekomerno nihanje cen ter nenehno odstopanje borznih tečajev in cen blaga od njihovih osnovnih ravni,
D. whereas the financial sector is heavily reliant on trading patterns, such as high-frequency trade (HFT), which are mainly targeted on short-term profits and are exposed to a high degree of leverage, which was one of the main causes of the financial crisis; whereas this has caused excessive price volatility and persistent deviations of stock and commodity prices from their fundamental levels,
E. ker je sposobnost podjetij, vlad in posameznikov, da si medsebojno (s)posojajo finančna sredstva, ključen dejavnik v svetovnem gospodarstvu; ker je finančna kriza izpostavila slabe značilnosti mednarodnega kapitalskega trga; ker zaradi tega meni, da je treba vzpostaviti ravnotežje med ukrepi za ohranjanje finančne stabilnosti in sposobnostjo bank za kreditiranje gospodarstva,
E. whereas the ability of businesses, governments and individuals to borrow and lend to one another is a crucial factor for the global economy; whereas the financial crisis has provided examples of unfortunate features of the international capital market; whereas for that reason it is necessary to strike a balance between the need to take steps that help to preserve financial stability and the need to maintain banks’ ability to provide credit to the economy,
F. ker je bil na srečanjih G-20 v Washingtonu 2008 in v Pittsburghu 2009 dosežen sporazum o izvedbi reform za okrepitev finančnih trgov, regulativnih okvirov ter nadzora za zagotovitev, da bodo finančne institucije sprejele pravičen del odgovornosti za nastalo krizo,
F. whereas at the G20 summits held in Washington in 2008 and in Pittsburgh in 2009 an agreement was reached to implement reforms to strengthen financial-market regulatory regimes and surveillance in order to make financial institutions assume their fair share of responsibility for the turmoil,
G. ker večji delež stroškov krize zaenkrat nosijo davkoplačevalci, katerih denar so vlade v številnih delih sveta uporabile za reševanje zasebnih bank in drugih finančnih institucij; ker je vse več pozivov, da finančne institucije in zainteresirane strani, ki so bile dolga leta deležne pretirano visokih donosov na kapital in izplačil letnih bonusov ter so uživale glavnino svetovnih dobičkov podjetij, prispevajo svoj pravičen delež za poravnavo stroškov,
G. whereas the main costs of the crisis have been borne thus far by taxpayers, whose money governments in many parts of the world have used to bail out private banks and other financial institutions; whereas there are growing calls for financial institutions and stakeholders, which have enjoyed years of excessive returns on equities and excessive annual bonus payouts and accounted for the majority of global corporate profits, to contribute their fair share to meeting the costs,
H. ker so v EU zlasti stroški reševanja poslabšali in pospešili nastop fiskalne in dolžniške krize, ki je nepričakovano obremenila javne proračune in resno ogrozila ustvarjanje delovnih mest, zagotavljanje socialne podpore in uresničevanje ciljev v zvezi z okoljem in podnebjem,
H. whereas in the EU in particular the cost of the bail-outs has worsened and accelerated the onset of a fiscal and debt crisis that has placed an unexpected burden on public budgets and severely endangered job creation, welfare state provision and the achievement of climate and environmental goals,
I. ker so bile kratkoročnost in špekulacije na trgih evropskih državnih obveznic bistven negativni dejavnik v dolžniški krizi euroobmočja v letih 2009–2010 ter so izpostavile tesno povezanost med slabostmi finančnega sektorja in težavami pri zagotavljanju vzdržnosti javnih financ v obdobju pretiranih proračunskih primanjkljajev in naraščajočega javnega in zasebnega dolga,
I. whereas short-termism and speculation on the European government bond market were important aggravating factors in the eurozone sovereign deficit crisis in 2009-2010 and have exposed the close links between the drawbacks of the financial sector and the problems in guaranteeing the sustainability of public finances at times of excessive budgetary deficits and growing public and private debt,
J. ker so neučinkovitost Pakta stabilnosti in rasti v njegovi sedanji obliki in razlike v konkurenčnosti držav članic spodbudile sedanjo razpravo o evropskem gospodarskem upravljanju, pri kateri bi se morali osredotočiti na ukrepe za okrepitev omenjenega pakta, zlasti njegovega preventivnega dela, takojšnjo uvedbo neizogibnih strukturnih reform ter usklajevanje davčne ureditve in boja proti izogibanju davkom, goljufiji in utaji davkov, da bi zagotovili davčno pravičnost in davčno obremenitev postopno prenesli z dejavnika dela na dejavnik kapitala in dejavnosti z izredno negativnimi eksternalijami,
J. whereas the ineffectiveness of the Stability and Growth Pact in its present form and the disparities in competitiveness between Member States prompted the current debate on European economic governance, key components of which should be measures to strengthen the Stability and Growth Pact, mainly its preventive provisions, launch without any further delay unavoidable structural reforms and coordinate taxation policies and the fight against tax avoidance, fraud and evasion in order to safeguard tax justice, while gradually shifting the tax burden from labour towards capital and activities with strong negative externalities,
K. ker je kriza izpostavila potrebo po novih, pravičnih in trajnih prihodkih s široko osnovo in po izvrševanju obstoječih zakonov o davčni utaji ter izboljšanju njihove učinkovitosti, s čimer bi zagotovili učinkovito uskladitev fiskalne konsolidacije in dolgotrajne oživitve gospodarstva ter vzdržnost javnih financ, ustvarjanje delovnih mest in družbeno vključenost, ki so glavne prednostne naloge agende EU 2020,
K. whereas the crisis has highlighted the need to raise new, broad-based, fair and sustainable revenues and to enforce existing laws on tax evasion and improve their effectiveness in order to ensure that fiscal consolidation is effectively combined with long-term economic recovery and the sustainability of public finances, job creation and social inclusion, which are key priorities of the EU 2020 agenda,
L. ker je prišlo zaradi nedavne krize do pomembnih proračunskih omejitev ravno v času, ko je EU začela izvajanje izredno pomembnih zavez na svetovni ravni, predvsem v zvezi s cilji na področju podnebnih sprememb, razvojnimi cilji tisočletja (RCT) in razvojno pomočjo, zlasti za prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam in ublažitev njihovih posledic za države v razvoju,
L. whereas the serious budget constraints resulting from the recent crisis come at a time when the EU has entered into highly important commitments at global level, mainly relating to climate-change targets, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and development aid, in particular for climate change adaptation and mitigation for developing countries,
M. ker je Evropski svet 17. junija 2010 izjavil, da bi morala EU voditi prizadevanja za vzpostavitev globalnega pristopa k uvedbi sistemov dajatev in davkov za finančne institucije, ter pozval k preučitvi in podrobnejšem razvoju vprašanja uvedbe globalnega davka na finančne transakcije,
M. whereas on 17 June 2010 the European Council stated that the EU should lead efforts to establish a global approach to the introduction of systems of levies and taxes on financial institutions and called for the issue of the introduction of a global financial transaction tax (FTT) to be explored and further developed,
N. ker je že pozval Komisijo, naj izvede oceno učinka in predloži analizo pozitivnih strani davka na finančne transakcije; zato je sklenil, da bo počakal na to analizo, preden sprejme nadaljnje ukrepe,
N. whereas it has already asked the Commission to carry out an impact assessment and provide an analysis of the positive merits of an FTT; resolving, therefore, to wait for this analysis before taking further action,
2. poudarja, da povišanje stopenj in povečanje obsega obstoječih mehanizmov obdavčitve ter nadaljnje zmanjševanje javnih izdatkov ne morejo biti zadostna ali trajna rešitev za prihodnje izzive na evropski in svetovni ravni; poudarja, da se je treba pri obravnavanju teh izzivov in obravnavanju novih sistemov financiranja osredotočiti zlasti na ustvarjanje sredstev za krepitev evropske konkurenčnosti in gospodarske rasti;
Emphasises that an increase in the rates and the scope of existing taxation tools and further cuts in public expenditure can be neither a sufficient nor a sustainable solution to address the main challenges ahead at European and global level; stresses that , when addressing these challenges and discussing new systems of financing, one of the main priorities should be creating means to strengthen the European competitiveness and economic growth;
6. poudarja, da je ena največjih prednosti Evropske unije njena velikost, ki jo je treba dodobra izkoristiti z izkoriščanjem potenciala enotnega trga in uporabo sredstev iz proračuna EU, da se izboljša prizadevanja javnega sektorja za spodbujanje vzvodov rasti;
Emphasises that one of the European Union’s greatest assets is its scale and that this asset must be used to the full by exploiting the potential of the Single Market and by using funds from the EU budget to bring added value to the public sector’s efforts to stimulate the drivers of growth;
Obdavčitev finančnega sektorja
Taxation of the f inancial s ector
10. poudarja, da mora EU v obdobju po krizi prepričati državljane, da ima voljo in orodja za sprejem uravnotežene kombinacije strategije fiskalne konsolidacije in politik za spodbujanje rasti, da se zagotovi dolgoročna oživitev gospodarstva;
Stresses that in the aftermath of the crisis the EU needs to convince its citizens that it has the will and the tools to go forward with a balanced combination of a fiscal consolidation strategy and stimulus policies in order to safeguard a long-term economic recovery;
14. poudarja sedanje ocene prihodkov davka na finančne transakcije z nizko stopnjo, ki bi s široko davčno osnovo lahko omogočil donos blizu 200 milijard EUR na leto na ravni EU in 650 milijard USD na svetovni ravni; meni, da bi lahko finančni sektor s tem bistveno prispeval k stroškom krize in vzdržnosti javnih financ;
Emphasises the current revenue estimates for a low-rate FTT, which could, with its large tax base, yield nearly EUR 200 billion per year at EU level and $650 billion at global level; considers that this could constitute a substantial contribution by the financial sector to the cost of the crisis and to public finance sustainability;
17. poudarja, da je pri preučevanju možnosti za obdavčitev finančnega sektorja na svetovni ravni in ravni EU treba upoštevati izkušnje, pridobljene z uvedbo sektorskih davkov na transakcije v državah članicah;
Points out that when examining options for the taxation of the financial sector at global and EU level the lessons learned from the introduction of sectoral transaction taxes at Member State level should be taken into account;
20. ugotavlja, da je nedavno sporočilo Komisije prvi korak k soočanju s to temo; meni, da breme dokazovanja morebitnih prednosti in/ali slabosti uvedbe davka na finančne transakcije na ravni EU nosi Komisija in njena ocena učinka;
Notes the recent Commission Communication as a first step in getting to grips with this topic; considers that the burden of proof regarding the possible advantages and/or drawbacks of the introduction of an FTT at EU level lies with the Commission and its impact assessment;
30. poudarja, da je treba morebitno uvedbo teh novih davčnih orodij v finančnem sektorju analizirati v okviru obstoječega davčnega okolja tega sektorja, pri tem pa upoštevati drugotne učinke in se posebej osredotočiti na iskanje sinergij med starimi in novimi davki;
Emphasises that the possible introduction of these new taxation tools in the financial sector should be analysed in the context of the existing tax environment in that sector, taking into account secondary effects and keeping a special focus on identifying synergies between old and new taxes;
32. ugotavlja, da se euroobveznice čedalje bolj smatrajo za skupni instrument upravljanja dolgov; je seznanjen z vsemi nedavnimi predlogi in pobudami na to temo; poziva Evropski svet in Komisijo, naj se nemudoma odzoveta na poziv Parlamenta v resoluciji o stalnem kriznem mehanizmu ( P7_TA-PROV(2010)0491 ), naj se zagotovi potrebni politični signal za preiskavo Komisije o prihodnjem sistemu euroobveznic, z določitvijo pogojev, pod katerimi bo takšen sistem ugoden za vse sodelujoče države članice in za celotno euroobmočje;
Notes that Eurobonds are increasingly referred to as a common debt management instrument; notes all recent proposals and initiatives to that effect; calls on the European Council and the Commission to provide an immediate response to call Parliament made in its resolution on the permanent crisis mechanism ( P7_TA-PROV(2010)0491 ) for the necessary political signal to be given for a Commission investigation into a future system of Eurobonds, with a view to determining the conditions under which such a system would be beneficial to all participating Member States and to the eurozone as a whole;
34. poudarja, da je treba proračun EU še bolj uporabljati za doseganje učinka vzvoda pri naložbah; poudarja, da bi morala biti standardna rešitev za projekte z dolgoročnim tržnim potencialom uporaba sredstev EU v partnerstvu z zasebnim bančnim sektorjem, zlasti prek Evropske investicijske banke (EIB) ter Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj (EBOR);
Emphasises that greater use should be made of the EU budget to leverage investment; stresses that the norm for projects with long-term commercial potential should be that EU funds are used in partnership with the private banking sector, in particular via the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD);
37. zato podpira krepitev sistema trgovanja z emisijami in obsežno revizijo direktive o obdavčitvi energije, da bi bile emisije CO 2 in energijska vsebnost glavni merili za obdavčitev energetskih proizvodov;
Supports, therefore, a strengthening of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and a comprehensive revision of the energy taxation directive to make CO 2 emissions and energy content basic criteria for the taxation of energy products;
41. kljub vsemu meni, da je treba pred uvedbo takega davka na uvožene proizvode v EU temeljito preučiti možnosti za sklenitev globalnega sporazuma na ravni G-20 ali v okviru WTO in s tem preprečiti, da bi tako orodje mejne davčne izravnave po eni strani povzročilo pomanjkanje surovin, po drugi strani pa privedlo do povračilnih ukrepov tretjih držav proti izvozu iz EU;
Considers, however, that the scope for a global agreement at G20 level or within the WTO should be fully explored before such a tax is imposed on foreign imports into the EU in order to ensure that this border taxation adjustment tool does not give rise to a shortage of raw materials, on the one hand, and retaliatory measures by third countries against EU exports, on the other;
43. ob upoštevanju vse večjih potreb po energiji v državah v vzponu, opozarja, da mora EU nujno zagotoviti zadostne naložbe na področju preskrbe z energijo in energetske učinkovitosti, kar bo zagotovilo izboljšanje njene energetske infrastrukture in kar najbolj zmanjšalo ranljivost za tržna nihanja, ki bi lahko negativno vplivala na gospodarstvo EU in na njene cilje do leta 2020;
Draws attention, bearing in mind the rising energy demand in emerging countries, to the EU’s imperative need to come up with adequate investments in the areas of energy supply and efficiency that will strengthen its energy infrastructure and reduce as much as possible its vulnerability to market fluctuations which could have negative consequences for the EU economy and the EU 2020 objectives;
Financiranje razvoja
Financing for d evelopment
53. poudarja izreden pomen dobrega finančnega upravljanja v zvezi z vso razvojno in humanitarno pomočjo EU, zlasti ker morajo biti evropske institucije, ki sodelujejo v postopkih odločanja in izvajanja te pomoči, v celoti odgovorne evropskim državljanom in davkoplačevalcem;
Stresses the paramount importance of sound financial management in respect of all EU development and humanitarian aid, in particular because the European institutions involved in the decision-making and implementation of this aid must be fully accountable to European citizens and taxpayers;
55. poudarja, da si je pri učinkovitem in kakovostnem zagotavljanju razvojne pomoči treba še posebej prizadevati za usklajevanje donatorjev in ureditev vodenja; meni, da bi rešitev problema razdrobljenosti pri evropski razvojni pomoči, ki povzroča neučinkovitost s finančnimi in političnimi posledicami, prinesla povečanje učinkovitosti, ki je ovrednoteno na do 6 milijard EUR na leto za države članice, in dodatno olajšala delo uprav partnerskih držav;
Stresses that effective, high-quality development aid delivery calls for a particular effort in terms of donor coordination and governance arrangements; believes that tackling the problem of fragmentation in European development aid, which causes inefficiencies which have both financial and political consequences, would bring efficiency gains estimated at up to EUR 6 billion a year for Member States and also facilitate the work of partner country administrations;