natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Razen tega se priznavanje verodostojnosti, dokazne moči in izvršljivosti javne listine za namene njene uporabe v zaprošeni državi članici lahko zavrne samo v primeru resnega in utemeljenega dvoma glede njene verodostojnosti ali če je priznavanje v nasprotju z javnim redom zaprošene države članice.
This exception apart, recognition of the authenticity, probative value and enforceability of an authentic act for the purposes of its use in the requested Member State may only be refused in the case of serious and substantiated doubts as to its authenticity, or if recognition is contrary to public policy in the Member State requested.
Ob vzajemnem zaupanju v sodstvo znotraj Skupnosti bi bilo upravičeno, da je postopek, s katerim postane javna listina, ki je izvršljiva v eni državi, izvršljiva tudi v drugi državi, učinkovit in hiter.
Mutual trust in the field of law within the Community justifies the establishment of an effective and rapid procedure to make an authentic act enforceable in one Member State also enforceable in another.
Poročevalec si pridružuje pravico, da predloži predloge spremembe k temu osnutku poročila še zlasti v luči študije, ki bo predvidoma na voljo oktobra.
The rapporteur reserves the right to propose amendments to this draft report, particularly in the light of the study that should be available in October.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi sporazuma med vlado Republike Koreje in Evropsko skupnostjo o sodelovanju pri protikonkurenčnih dejavnostih
on the proposal for a Council decision concluding the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the European Community concerning cooperation on anti-competitive activities
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ....................................8
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............10
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi sporazuma med vlado Republike Koreje in Evropsko skupnostjo o sodelovanju pri protikonkurenčnih dejavnostih
on the proposal for a Council decision on concluding the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the European Community concerning cooperation on anti-competitive activities
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( SEC(2007)1731 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( SEC(2007)1731 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma med vlado Republike Koreje in Evropsko skupnostjo o sodelovanju pri protikonkurenčnih dejavnostih,
– having regard to the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the European Community concerning cooperation on anti-competitive activities,
– ob upoštevanju členov 83 in 308 Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Articles 83 and 308 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0398/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0398/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6–0452/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0452/2008 ),
Predlog sklepa Sveta – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a Council decision – amending act
Ker je medsebojno priznanje konkurenčnega prava med Evropsko skupnostjo in Južno Korejo najučinkovitejši način za obravnavo protikonkurenčnega ravnanja, je treba čim bolj zmanjšati uporabo instrumentov trgovinske zaščite med državama;
As mutual recognition of competition law between the European Community and South Korea is the most efficient way to tackle anti-competitive behaviour, the use of trade defence instruments (TDIs) between the two parties should be minimised;
EU in Južna Koreja sta se odločili medsebojno priznati konkurenčno pravo, kar zagotavlja učinkovito sredstvo za obravnavo protikonkurenčnega ravnanja.
The EU and South Korea have decided to mutually recognise each others' competition laws which provide an efficient means to tackle anti-competitive behaviour.
Instrumenti trgovinske zaščite se uporabljajo za preprečevanje protikonkurenčnega ravnanja, kadar konkurenčno pravo ne obstaja ali ni vzajemno priznano; z veljavnostjo sporazuma o sodelovanju naj bi EU in Južna Koreja medsebojno priznali zakone in organe, tako da bodo instrumenti trgovinske zaščite v odnosu med pogodbenicama zastareli.
Since TDIs are used to tackle anti-competitive behaviour when competition laws are lacking or are not mutually recognised, the coming into effect of the cooperation agreement should mean that EU and South Korea recognise each others' laws and authorities so TDIs will become obsolete in the relation between the two parties.
(4a) Ta sporazum je treba obravnavati v skupnem okviru veljavnih sporazumov med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Korejo ter sporazumov, o katerih še tečejo pogajanja, zlasti glede morebitnega sporazuma o prosti trgovini.
(4a) This Agreement should be considered in the context of the overall framework of existing agreements between the European Community and the Republic of Korea and those currently under negotiation, in particular the negotiations concerning a potential free trade agreement.
Kot je Parlament ugotovil v svoji resoluciji z dne 13. decembra 2007
As the Parliament noted in its resolution of 13 December 2007
P6_TA(2007)0629 . o trgovinskih in gospodarskih odnosih s Korejo, bi bil lahko obširen, ambiciozen in uravnotežen sporazum zelo koristen za obe strani.
P6_TA(2007)0629 . on trade and economic relations with Korea, a wide ranging, ambitious and well balanced agreement could produce significant benefits for each side.
Hkrati je pomembno, da bi bil sporazum, katerega namen je izkoreniniti protikonkurenčne dejavnosti, del širšega uravnoteženega svežnja sporazumov med EU in Korejo, kjer bi bilo obravnavano tudi sodelovanje pri vprašanjih spodbujanja socialnih in okoljskih standardov.
At the same time, it is important that this Agreement, which seeks to combat anti-competitive practices, should form part of broad, balanced package of agreements between the EU and Korea, that would also cover cooperation on issues such as the promotion of social and environmental standards.
Sporazum med EU in Korejo o konkurenčnosti
The Korea-EC Competition Agreement
Generalni direktorat Evropske komisije za konkurenco in korejska Komisija za pošteno trgovino (KFTC) sta oktobra 2004 podpisala memorandum o soglasju in vzpostavila strukturiran dialog.
The European Commission’s DG Competition and the Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding in October 2004, establishing a structured dialogue.
Uvodna pogajanja o formalnem sporazumu o sodelovanju med EU in Republiko Korejo so se začela junija 2006.
Exploratory talks concerning a formal cooperation agreement between the EU and the Republic of Korea began in June 2006.
Sporazum je bil sklenjen v začetku leta 2008, varovanje tajnosti pa je bilo preklicano 18. februarja, čeprav se je besedilo še naprej spreminjalo.
The Agreement was concluded in early 2008 and declassified on 18 February although the text has continued to be subject to amendments.
Podobni sporazumi z Združenimi državami (1991), Kanado (1999) in Japonsko (2003) že veljajo.
Similar agreements are already in place with the United States (1991), Canada (1999) and Japan (2003).
Namen sporazuma je prispevati k učinkovitemu izvajanju konkurenčnega prava s spodbujanjem sodelovanja med pristojnimi organi za konkurenco in z zmanjšanjem možnosti za spore.
The Agreement seeks to contribute to the effective enforcement of competition laws by promoting cooperation between competition authorities and reducing the likelihood of conflicts.
Sporazum določa obveščanje o ukrepih izvrševanja s strani enega organa za konkurenco, ki lahko vplivajo na pomembne interese druge pogodbenice, določa medsebojno pomoč, vključno z možnostjo, da ena stran zaprosi drugo za izvajanje ukrepov izvrševanja, ter usklajevanje ukrepov izvrševanja in izmenjavo informacij.
It provides for notification of enforcement activities by one of the competition authorities that may affect important interests of the other party, mutual assistance, including the possibility for one side to ask the other to undertake enforcement action, and coordination of enforcement activities as well as exchanges of information.
Vključeni so tudi ukrepi glede zaupnosti.
There are also measures concerning confidentiality.
Sporazumi o konkurenčnosti
Competition Agreements
Glede na to, da mednarodna trgovina že desetletja raste bistveno hitreje kot pa nacionalni dohodek ter da se tudi neposredne tuje naložbe hitro povečujejo, je jasno, da so svetovna gospodarstva med seboj vedno bolj povezana.
Given that, for decades, international trade has been growing significantly faster than national incomes, and that Foreign Direct Investment has also been expanding rapidly, it follows that the world’s economies are becoming increasingly interlinked.
Te sicer dobrodošle, a vse močnejše vezi s seboj prinašajo tudi večje možnosti, da protikonkurenčne dejavnosti vplivajo na več trgov ter da ima lahko ukrepanje enega organa za konkurenco posledice za druge.
Whilst welcome, these strengthening links carry with them an increased likelihood that anti-competitive practices may affect more than one market and that the action of one competition authority may have implications for others.
Zato je zelo zaželeno zagotoviti učinkovit pretok informacij med organi in hkrati ohranjati zahtevano stopnjo zaupnosti.
Ensuring effective flows of information between the authorities, whilst maintaining the required degree of confidentiality, is therefore highly desirable.
Karteli pogosto združujejo mednarodno delujoča podjetja, z vse večjo globalizacijo in tujimi naložbami pa raste tudi mednarodna razsežnost prevzemov, tako da je sodelovanje organov za konkurenco nujno potrebno, če naj se zagotovi varstvo javnega interesa ter nacionalnim organom omogoči, da se borijo proti geografsko široko razširjenim protikonkurenčnim dejavnostim.
With cartels frequently involving companies that are operating internationally and the international dimension of mergers growing with increased globalisation and foreign investment, competition authorities need to cooperate so as to ensure that the public interest is protected and to enable national authorities to combat anti-competitive activities that are geographically widespread.
Jasnejši mednarodni standardi koristijo tudi podjetjem, ki delujejo v več družbah, ter pomirjujoče delujejo na vse, ki so v skrbeh, da je njihov konkurenčni položaj nepošteno oslabljen.
Clearer international standards should also be of benefit to those firms operating in several companies and provide reassurance to those fearing that their competitive position is being unfairly undermined.
Koreja je četrta največja neevropska trgovinska partnerica EU, EU pa je največji tuji vlagatelj v Koreji.
Korea is the EU’s fourth largest non-European trading partner and the EU is Korea’s largest foreign investor.
Glede na vse večji pomen tega partnerstva se zdi primerno, da se Koreja pridruži ostalim trem partnericam, s katerimi ima Evropska skupnost sklenjene sporazume o sodelovanju pri protikonkurenčnih dejavnostih.
Given the growing importance of this partnership it seems appropriate that Korea should be added to the three other partners with which the EC has agreements concerning cooperation on anti-competitive activities.
Seveda sporazum te vrste zagotavlja samo okvir za učinkovito sodelovanje.
Of course, an Agreement of this type merely provides the framework for effective cooperation.
Glede na vse večji pomen trgovine in gospodarskih odnosov z Azijo je treba pozornost posvetiti tudi krepitvi povezav z drugimi pomembnimi hitro rastočimi gospodarstvi, kot je Indija, ter sosedami EU, kot je Švica.
In view of the growing importance of trade and economic relations with Asia, consideration should be given to enhancing links with other significant, fast growing economies such as that of India as well as EU neighbours such as Switzerland.
V tem pogledu je vredno opozoriti, da imajo Združene države sklenjene sporazume o konkurenčnosti z Avstralijo, Brazilijo, Kanado, Izraelom, Japonsko, Mehiko in Evropsko skupnostjo.
In this context it is worth noting that the US has competition agreements with Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Japan and Mexico as well as the EC.
Drugi sporazumi s Korejo
Other Agreements with Korea
Parlament je že izrazil široko podporo prostotrgovinskemu sporazumu s Korejo ter pri tem pozval, naj bo tak sporazum ambiciozen, visoke kakovosti ter naj seže prek znižanja tarif.
The Parliament has already given broad support to a free trade agreement with Korea whilst calling for such an agreement to be ambitious, high quality and going well beyond tariff reductions.
V sedmem krogu pogajanj, ki je potekal od 12. do 15. maja 2008, je bilo dogovorjeno, da bo naslednji krog pogajanj končni.
During the seventh negotiating round, which took place between 12 and 15 May 2008, it was agreed that the next round of negotiations would be the final one.
Obeti zaključka teh pogajanj so dobrodošli, zlasti glede na težave pri drugih dvostranskih in večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanjih, vendar pa bi moral Parlament še naprej vztrajati, da je vsebina sporazuma pomembnejša od umetnega zastavljenega roka.
Whilst the prospect of a conclusion to these negotiations is welcome, particularly given the problems that have been encountered by other bilateral and interregional trade negotiations, the Parliament should continue to insist that the substance of the agreement is more important than any artificial deadline.
Klavzule o konkurenčnosti v splošnejšem sporazumu bi morale biti v skladu s tistimi v bolj specifičnem sporazumu o konkurenčnosti ter jih podpirati.
The competition clauses in the wider agreement should be consistent with and support those of the specific competition agreement.
Na splošno gledano bo za zagotavljanje politične in javne podpore sporazumu v Koreji in EU pomembno, da je ambicioznost glede večjega dostopa do trga v ravnovesju z enako ambicioznim pristopom k trajnostnemu razvoju.
More generally, in order to secure political and public acceptance of the agreement in both Korea and the EU, it will be important that the level of ambition with regard to increased market access is balanced by an equally ambitious approach to sustainable development.
Ravno tako je treba spomniti, da je končni cilj krepitev dogovorjenih socialnih in okoljskih standardov.
It must also be remembered that the ultimate objective is the enforcement of agreed social and environmental standards.
To pomeni, da za poglavje o trajnostnem razvoju veljajo učinkoviti mehanizmi izvajanja.
This means that the sustainable development chapter should be subject to effective enforcement mechanisms.
Forum o trgovini in trajnostnem razvoju, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki organizacij delavcev in delodajalcev ter nevladnih organizacij, bi lahko imel pomembno vlogo pri zagotavljanju, da se z večjo odprtostjo trga zvišujejo socialni in okoljski standardi.
A trade and sustainable development forum, made up of representatives from workers’ and employers’ organisations and from NGOs, would play a valuable role in ensuring that greater market opening is accompanied by rising social and environmental standards.
Vendar je treba za zagotavljanje, da tak forum ni le debatni klub, vzpostaviti mehanizem, prek katerega bi lahko priznane organizacije delavcev ali delodajalcev EU ali Koreje predložile zahteve za ukrepanje.
However, to ensure that such a forum is more than a talking shop, a mechanism should be established whereby recognised EU or Korean worker or employer associations were able to submit requests for action.
Te zahteve bi bilo treba preučiti in se nanje odzvati v določenem časovnem obdobju z možnostjo stalnega nadaljnjega spremljanja in pregledovanja, da se ohranja pritisk na kršitelje pravic delavcev ali okoljskih standardov.
Such requests should be investigated and responded to within a specified time period, with the possibility of ongoing follow-up and review, so as to maintain pressure on those who violate workers’ rights or environmental standards.
Generalni direktorat za trgovino v izjavah za medije o pogajanjih poudarja liberalizacijo industrijskih tarif poleg občutljivih vprašanj, kot so standardi in certificiranje v industrijah, kot sta avtomobilska in industrija elektronike, ter liberalizacija različnih storitvenih sektorjev v Koreji.
In press releases about the negotiations, DG Trade has highlighted industrial tariff liberalisation, behind the border issues such as standards and certification in industries such as electronics and automotive and liberalisation in different service sectors in Korea.
To so sicer gotovo pomembna vprašanja s pomembnimi posledicami za evropska podjetja in delavce, vendar je dostop do trga le en del uspešnega sporazuma.
Whilst these are certainly important and can have significant implications for European firms and workers, market access is only one element of a successful agreement.
Komisija bi morala pokazati enako vitalnost pri spodbujanju netrgovinskih vprašanj, ki neposredno vplivajo na delovno in fizično okolje evropskih in korejskih državljanov.
What is needed is for the Commission to show equal vigour in promoting non-trade concerns that directly affect European and Korean citizens’ working and physical environments.
Ta vprašanja se morda ne zdijo povezana s sporazumom o sodelovanju za preprečevanje protikonkurenčnih dejavnosti, vendar postanejo pomembna, če na sporazum gledamo v okviru sodelovanja med Evropsko unijo in Republiko Korejo, katerega namen je zagotoviti učinkovito podporo ciljem javne politike.
Whilst these points may seem somewhat removed from an agreement dealing with cooperation to prevent anti-competitive practices, they become relevant when this Agreement is seen as part of a framework of cooperation between the European Union and the Republic of Korea designed to ensure the effective promotion of public policy goals.
V tem pogledu je povsem razumno pozdraviti sklenitev sporazuma o konkurenčnosti, a pri tem pozvati Komisijo, naj si enako prizadeva pri spodbujanju sporazumov, ki obravnavajo socialna in okoljska vprašanja, ki neposredno zadevajo državljane Evropske unije in Koreje.
In this context, it is perfectly reasonable to welcome the conclusion of the Competition Agreement whilst calling on the Commission to invest equal effort in promoting agreements to address social and environmental issues that are of direct concern to citizens in the EU and Korea.
Sredi januarja je Evropska komisija predstavila predlog sklepa Sveta o sporazumu o sodelovanju med ES in Korejo.
In mid-January the European Commission presented a proposal for a Council decision on the EC-Korea cooperation agreement.
V skladu s členom 83 Pogodbe se je treba o tem predlogu posvetovati s Parlamentom.
In accordance with article 83 of the Treaty, Parliament has to be consulted on the proposal.
Sporazum je del vrste sklepov Sveta na področju mednarodnega sodelovanja pri protikonkurenčnih dejavnostih.
The agreement is part of a series of Council decisions in the field of international cooperation on anti-competitive activities.
Do sedaj so bili formalni medvladni sporazumi sklenjeni z Združenimi državami (podpisan 1991), Kanado (1999) in Japonsko (2003).
So far formal intergovernmental agreements exist with the United States (signed in 1991), Canada (1999) and Japan (2003).
Evropska skupnost je sklenila tudi tako imenovane medagencijske dogovore, ki stranem omogočajo vzpostavitev tesnejših in rednejših stikov.
The EC has also concluded so-called inter-agency arrangements which allow the parties to establish closer and more regular contacts.
Memorandum o soglasju, sklenjen med Generalnim direktoratom za konkurenco Evropske komisije in Komisijo za pošteno trgovino Republike Koreje (2004), je zgleden primer za tovrstne sporazume.
The Memorandum of Understanding concluded between DG Competition and the Korean Fair Trade Commission (2004) is a good example of this type of agreement.
Trenutni predlog za sklenitev sporazuma med Vlado Republike Koreje in Evropsko skupnostjo o sodelovanju pri protikonkurenčnih dejavnostih podaja stališče obeh strani: in sicer, da se svetovna gospodarstva čedalje bolj približujejo in postajajo vse bolj soodvisna.
The current proposal for an agreement between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the European Community concerning cooperation on anti-competitive activities expresses the view of both parties: that world economies are moving ever closer together and are becoming more interdependent.
Na ravni mikrogospodarstva podjetja vedno bolj poslujejo prek meja.
On a microeconomic level, companies increasingly operate across borders.
Obseg poslovanja med azijskimi državami in državami članicami EU je v preteklih letih občutno narasel.
Trade volumes between Asian countries and EU member states have multiplied during recent years.
V zvezi s tem delita obe strani, Evropska skupnost in korejska vlada, stališče, da je konkurenčno pravo ključnega pomena tako za uspešnost poslovanja na zadevnih trgih kot tudi za gospodarsko blaginjo evropskih in korejskih potrošnikov.
In this light, both parties, the EC and the Korean Government, share the view that competition law is vital to the efficient operation of their respective markets, as well as to the economic welfare of European and Korean consumers.
Cilj predlaganega sporazuma je izvrševanje zadevne zakonodaje o konkurenci, da se spodbuja sodelovanje in usklajevanje med organi za konkurenco Evropske skupnosti in Koreje ter prepreči oziroma vsaj zmanjša možnost morebitnih sporov.
The proposed agreement aims at enforcing the respective competition laws by promoting cooperation and coordination between the EC and Korean competition authorities and to avoid, or at least to reduce, the probability of potential conflicts.
Ključne določbe sporazuma so:
To summarise, the key provisions of the agreement are as follows:
- uradna obvestila (člen 2)
- Notification (Art 2)
- sodelovanje pri izvrševanju (člen 3)
- Enforcement cooperation (Art 3)
- usklajevanje ukrepov izvrševanja (člen 4)
- Coordination of enforcement activities (Art 4)
- izogibanje sporom/pasivna kurtoazija (člen 5)
- Conflict avoidance/Negative Comity (Art 5)
- aktivna kurtoazija (člen 6)
- Positive Comity (Art 6)
- zaupnost (člen 7)
- Confidentiality (Art 7)
- sestanki (člen 8)
- Meetings (Art 8)
STALIŠČE PRIPRAVLJAVCA MNENJA:
RAPPORTEUR'S ASSESSMENT:
Globalizacija in pritisk konkurence se bosta v naslednjih letih nedvomno povečali.
Globalisation and competitive pressure will undoubtedly increase over the coming years.
Zaradi tega se bo še hitreje povečal pomen učinkovitega sodelovanja med organi za uveljavljanje konkurence.
The importance of efficient cooperation between competition enforcers will therefore increase at an even more rapid pace.
Iz tega razloga pripravljavec pozdravlja predlog za sporazum med Vlado Republike Koreje in Evropsko skupnostjo.
Hence, your rapporteur welcomes the proposal for an agreement between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the European Community wholeheartedly.
Sporazum je skladen z željo Evropskega parlamenta, izraženo v številnih resolucijah, naj se pri uporabi evropskega konkurenčnega prava vključi razsežnost tretjih držav.
It is in line with the wish of the European Parliament, expressed in various resolutions, to include the third country dimension in the application of European competition law.
Izključno nacionalni ali celo regionalni pristop do politiki o konkurenci dejansko ne bi bil odraz današnje poslovne realnosti.
In fact, a solely national or even regional approach to competition policy would not reflect today's business reality.
Če na primer podjetja vzpostavijo mednarodne kartele in jih upravljajo čezmejno, je ključna naloga organov za konkurenco, da se na to primerno odzove.
If, for example, companies create international cartels and operate them across borders, it becomes vital for competition authorities to respond in an appropriate manner.