natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izjava o zmogljivosti (seznam, ravni ali razredi in sklicevanje na ustrezno usklajeno tehnično specifikacijo (usklajeni standardi (vključno s posebno tehnično dokumentacijo )/evropski ocenjevalni list, uporabljeno za oceno zmogljivosti za navedene bistvene značilnosti)
Declaration of performance (list, levels or classes and reference to the corresponding harmonised technical specification (harmonised standard (including through Specific Technical Documentation) /European Assessment Document) used for the assessment of the performance for the declared essential characteristics)
Treba je pojasniti posamezne načine, ki vodijo k usklajenim tehničnim specifikacijam in znakom CE.
It is important to clarify the different routes that lead to harmonised technical specifications and CE marking.
Priloga III – točka 7 – tabela – zadnji stolpec
Annex III – point 7 – table – last column
Sklicevanje usklajene tehnične specifikacije/ posebne tehnične dokumentacije
Reference of the harmonised technical specification / Specific Technical Documentation
Sklicevanje usklajene tehnične specifikacije (usklajeni standardi (vključno s posebno tehnično dokumentacijo)/evropski ocenjevalni list)
Reference of the harmonised technical specification (harmonised standard (including through Specific Technical Documentation )/European Assessment Document)
Priloga V – naslov
Annex V – title
Priloga V – točka 1 – naslov
Annex V – point 1 – title
SISTEMI OCENJEVANJA IN PREVERJANJA NESPREMENLJIVOSTI ZMOGLJIVOSTI
SYSTEMS OF ASSESSMENT AND VERIFICATION OF CONSTANCY OF PERFORMANCE
SISTEM OCENJEVANJA IN POTRJEVANJA SKLADNOSTI
SYSTEM OF ASSESSMENT AND ATTESTATION OF CONFORMITY
Priloga V – točka 1.1 – uvodni del
Annex V – point 1.1 – introductory phrase
Sistem 1+ – Izjava proizvajalca o zmogljivosti za bistvene značilnosti proizvoda na podlagi naslednjih postavk:
System 1+ - Declaration of the performance for the essential characteristics of the product by the manufacturer on the basis of following items:
Nov sistem številčenja bi lahko zmedel potrošnike in povzročil nepotrebno upravno breme in stroške.
The new numbering system could confuse customers and could create unnecessary administrative work and cost.
Sprejema se novi spremenjeni sistem, vendar se za preprečevanje zmede predlaga ohranitev veljavnega številčenja v skladu s smernicami K.
We accept the new reduced system but to avoid confusion we would suggest keeping the existing numbering according to Guidance Paper K.
Priloga V – točka 1.2 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V – point 1.2 – introductory phrase
Priloga V – točka 1.3 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V – point 1.3 – introductory phrase
Priloga V – točka 1.4 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V – point 1.4 – introductory phrase
Priloga V – točka 1.5 – uvodno besedilo
Annex V – point 1.5 – introductory phrase
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izpolnjevanju zahtev države zastave
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on compliance with flag State requirements
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (14288/2/2008 – C6-0484/2008 )
– having regard to the Council common position (14288/2/2008 – C6-0484/2008 )
UL C 330 E, 30.12.2008, str.
OJ C 330 E, 30.12.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju izjave držav članic o pomorski varnosti (15859/2008),
– having regard to the statement of the Member States on maritime safety (15859/2008),
140. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0586 ),
140. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0586 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 67 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0069/2009 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0069/2009 ),
24. februar 2006: Predlog Komisije
24 February 2006: Commission proposal
Komisija je predstavila predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izpolnjevanju zahtev države zastave kot enega od predlogov iz tretjega paketa za pomorsko varnost, imenovanega tudi ERIKA III.
The Commission presented the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on compliance with flag State requirements as one of the proposals of the third maritime safety package, also called ERIKA III.
Države zastave, to so države, ki dajejo ladjam pravico do plovbe pod njihovo zastavo, so kot članice Mednarodne pomorske organizacije (IMO) odgovorne, da izpolnjujejo konvencije IMO, katerih pogodbenice so.
Flag States, that is states which grant ships the right to fly their flag, have a responsibility as members of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to comply with the Organisation's Conventions to which they are party.
Zagotavljati morajo, da ladje v njihovem registru izpolnjujejo zahteve, ki so zapisane v konvencijah, katerih namen je spodbujati varnost življenja na morju in varovanje morskega okolja.
They must ensure that ships on their register meet the requirements laid down in those Conventions, which are designed to promote safety of life at sea and protection of the marine environment.
Glavne obveznosti držav zastave so zapisane v Kodeksu za izvajanje obveznih instrumentov IMO, ki je bil sprejet novembra 2005.
The key obligations of flag States are set out in the Code for the Implementation of Mandatory IMO Instruments, adopted in November 2005.
Izpolnjevanje teh obveznosti se preverja v okviru sistema pregledov držav članic IMO, ki je bil prav tako sprejet novembra 2005.
Compliance with these obligations is to be tested by means of an IMO Member State Audit Scheme, also adopted in November 2005.
Sodelovanje v sistemu pregledov pa je prostovoljno.
But participation in the Audit Scheme is voluntary.
Še več, IMO nima pooblastila za kaznovanje držav pogodbenic, ki ne izvajajo zahtev konvencije ali teh zahtev ne uveljavljajo pri ladjah, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo.
Moreover the IMO has no power of sanction against state parties which do not implement Convention requirements or enforce these on ships that fly their flag.
Namen predloga Komisije je zagotoviti, da bi države članice dejansko in dosledno izpolnjevale svoje obveznosti kot države zastave v skladu z konvencijami IMO, povezanimi s pomorsko varnostjo in preprečevanjem onesnaževanja, ki ga povzročajo ladje.
The Commission proposal aims at ensuring that Member States effectively and consistently discharge their obligations as flag States in accordance with the IMO Conventions relating to maritime safety and the prevention of pollution caused by ships.
Predlog tako predvideva, da bi vse države članice postale pogodbenice konvencij IMO ter v celoti uporabljale obvezne določbe o državah zastave, navedene v teh konvencijah, ter da bi deli kodeksa IMO za izvajanje obveznih instrumentov IMO (Kodeks države zastave) ter prostovoljni sistem pregledov držav članic IMO postali obvezni na ravni Skupnosti.
To this effect, the proposal foresees that all Member States become party to the IMO conventions and apply in full the mandatory flag State related provisions laid down therein, and that parts of the IMO Code for the implementation of mandatory IMO instruments ("Flag State Code") as well as the Voluntary IMO Member State Audit Scheme would become compulsory at Community level.
Potreba po prenosu obveznosti IMO v pravo Skupnosti temelji na dveh elementih: prvič, pomanjkanje mehanizmov nadzora in sankcij po mednarodnem pomorskem pravu, in drugič, velike razlike v kakovosti, ugotovljene med evropskimi državami zastave.
The need to transpose the IMO obligations into Community law is attributable to the following two factors: on the one hand, the absence of monitoring arrangements and penalties under international maritime law and, on the other, the high incidence of disparities in quality noted among the European flag States.
V praksi je cilj predloga Komisije odprava dveh glavnih pomanjkljivosti IMO, razen pomanjkljivosti, da nima pravice nadzora nad uporabo pravil, ki jih določa, in sicer:
In practical terms, the Commission proposal seeks to alleviate two of the IMO's principal weaknesses other than that of a lack of power of control over the application of the rules which it lays down, namely:
– obstoj visoke ravni presoje, dodeljene vsaki pogodbenici, kar ji omogoča, da koristi izvzetja ali odstopanja od temeljnih pravil konvencij;
– the existence of a high degree of discretion accorded to each contracting party enabling them to benefit from exemptions or derogations from the basic rules of the conventions;
– neobvezujoči ukrepi glede nadzora, sprejeti v obliki resolucije IMO, ki se štejejo kot bistveni za učinkovito uporabo navedenih obveznosti.
– the non-mandatory character of the accompanying measures adopted in the form of an IMO Resolution but regarded as essential for the effective application of the said obligations.
29. marec 2007: Evropski parlament je izglasoval mnenje v prvi obravnavi.
29 March 2007: The European Parliament voted its opinion at first reading
Parlament se je močno zavzemal za široko podporo predlogu Komisije in sprejel številne predloge sprememb, katerih namen je dodatno okrepiti predlagano zakonodajo.
Parliament urged broad support for the Commission proposal and adopted a number of amendments aimed at even strengthening the proposed legislation.
Splošno načelo pri tem je bilo, da je treba ves čas zagotavljati varnost ladijskega prometa Skupnosti, državljanov, ki ga uporabljajo, in izvajalcev, ki opravljajo storitve ladijskega prometa, ter varovanje okolja.
The general principle is that the safety of Community shipping and of citizens using it, and of operators providing shipping services and the protection of environment should be ensured at all times.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta v prvi obravnavi je bilo, da mora vsaka država članica zagotoviti usposabljanje nadzornikov in preiskovalcev države zastave ter razviti zmogljivosti pregleda in odobritve načrtov gradnje in opremljanja ladij ter izdaje dovoljenj zanje.
The European Parliament first reading position takes the view that each Member State should ensure the training of flag State surveyors and investigators and should develop a capacity for reviewing, approving and authorising ship construction and equipment designs.
Parlament je postavil pogoj, da mora pri prvi registraciji ladje v neki državi članici ta država preveriti, ali ladja izpolnjuje veljavna mednarodna pravila in predpise, ter zagotoviti, da to potrjujejo dokazne listine.
Parliament has made it a requirement for the first registration of a ship in a Member State that this Member State should ascertain whether this ship complies with the applicable international rules and regulations and ensure that this is to be confirmed by documentary evidence.
Če ladja ni nova, država članica naveže stike s prejšnjo državo zastave ter jo zaprosi, da ji preda potrebne listine in podatke.
If a ship is not newly built, it shall liaise with the previous flag State and request it to pass on the necessary documents and data.
Evropski parlament tudi želi, da bi države članice vzpostavile ali vzdrževale podatkovno bazo za svoje ladje, ki bi vsebovala glavne tehnične podatke o vsaki ladji.
The European Parliament also wants the Member States to develop or to maintain a fleet database for their ships, with the main technical details of each ship.
Večina držav članic je menila, da zakonodajno besedilo na ravni Skupnosti ne bi bilo pravi instrument za urejanje tega vidika pomorske varnosti.
A majority of Member States considered that a legislative text at Community level would not be the right instrument to regulate this aspect of maritime safety.
Nekatere delegacije so izrazile resne pomisleke v zvezi z obvezno ratifikacijo konvencij IMO, ki jo predvideva direktiva, in imajo resne težave z določbami o obvezni uporabi Kodeksa države zastave IMO na ravni Skupnosti.
Some delegations expressed serious concerns related to the mandatory ratification of the IMO conventions foreseen by the Directive and have serious difficulties with the provisions concerning the mandatory application of the IMO Flag State Code at Community level.
Na splošno pa je velika večina držav članic podprla pristop nezavezujočega akta, s katerim bi se zagotovilo, da države zastave izpolnjujejo mednarodne obveznosti.
In general, a large majority of Member States favoured a "soft law" approach to ensure that flag States comply with their international obligations.
Poročevalec je zaznal zastoj na strani Sveta in dosegel uspešen dogovor z ostalimi poročevalci v okviru svežnja Erika III ter na splošno z Odborom za promet in turizem, da je predlog direktive o izpolnjevanju zahtev države zastave sestavni in nujni del celotnega svežnja, ter je kot tak ključnega pomena pri doseganju cilja okrepitve pomorske varnosti.
Noting this impasse on the Council side, your Rapporteur succeeded to agree with the other Rapporteurs of the Erika III package and the Committee on Transport and Tourism in general that the proposal for a Directive on compliance with flag State requirements constitutes an integral and indispensable part of the whole package and thus a fundamental key in achieving the goal of reinforcing maritime security.
Skladno s tem je bila dosežena odločitev o vključitvi bistvenega dela tega predloga v obliki predlogov spremembe v stališče Parlamenta na drugi obravnavi enega od preostalih predlogov v svežnju, namreč tistega o skupnih predpisih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za inšpekcijski pregled in nadzor ladij ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav (ki razveljavlja Direktivo 94/57/ES).
Accordingly it was decided to introduce the essential part of this proposal as amendments to the second reading EP position on another dossier of the package notably on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for relevant activities of maritime administrations (repealing Directive 94/57/EC).
Ta postopek je spodbudil Svet, da je ponovno odprl razpravo o temu predlogu na neformalnem Svetu EU za promet 1. septembra 2008 v La Rochelle.
This procedure has incited the Council to reopen the discussions on this dossier at the informal EU Transport Council in La Rochelle on 1 September 2008.
9. december 2008: Skupno stališče Sveta
9 December 2008: Council c ommon position
Po tehtnih pogajanjih in prizadevanjih med slovenskim predsedovanjem ter kasnejših poskusih, zlasti med francoskim predsedovanjem EU, je bil 9. oktobra 2008 dosežen začetni politični dogovor o besedilu, Svet pa je soglasno sprejel skupno stališče z namenom sprejetja direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izpolnjevanju obveznosti države zastave.
After substantial negotiations and efforts by the Slovenian Presidency and thereafter, specially the French Presidency of the EU, an initial political agreement on the text was obtained on 9 October 2008, the Council has unanimously adopted a common position with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on compliance with flag State obligations.
Svet je menil, da je treba iz operativnega dela odstraniti nekatere pomembne določbe, kot so tiste v zvezi z ratifikacijo mednarodnih konvencij in obvezno uporabo Kodeksa države zastave IMO v Skupnosti.
The Council considered it necessary to remove from the operative part certain important provisions such as those concerning the ratification of international conventions and the mandatory application in the Community of the Flag State Code of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO).
Zato se skupno stališče Sveta osredotoča predvsem na naslednje:
Therefore, the Council's common position focuses in particular on the following:
– medtem ko čakajo, da postane sistem pregledov IMO obvezen, morajo države članice opraviti takšen pregled svojih pomorskih uprav in objaviti rezultate.
– Whilst waiting for the IMO audit scheme to become mandatory, Member States have to subject their maritime authorities to such an audit and publish the results.
– države članic vzpostavijo sistem vodenja kakovosti za svoje pomorske uprave, ki je potrjen v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi.
– Member States shall put in place a quality management system for their maritime authorities, which is certified in accordance with international standards.
– preden dovolijo ladji plovbo pod njihovo zastavo, države članice preverijo, ali se ladja ravna po mednarodnih pravilih.
– Before authorising a ship to fly their respective flag, Member States have to check that it complies with international rules.
– države članice morajo zagotoviti, da ladje, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo in so bile zadržane v okviru pregleda države pristanišča, izpolnjujejo zahteve ustreznih konvencij IMO.
– Member States have to make sure that ships which fly their respective flag and have been detained in the context of a port State inspection are brought into conformity with the relevant IMO conventions.
– pri državah članicah, katerih zastava je na črni listi ali pa se dve leti zapored pojavijo na sivi listi pariškega memoranduma o soglasju glede nadzora, ki ga opravlja inšpekcija za varnost plovbe, so države članice dolžne Komisiji poročati o razlogih za slab rezultat.
– In the case of Member States whose flag is blacklisted or which, for two consecutive years, appears on the grey list of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State control, Member States have to report the reasons for the poor performance to the Commission.
Skupno stališče, ki je rezultat tega pristopa, v veliki meri spreminja prvotni predlog Komisije in zagotavlja obstoj usklajenega svežnja ukrepov na področju pomorske varnosti, kar predstavlja pomemben korak naprej pri zagotavljanju, da se nesreče, kot sta bili tisti z ladjama ERIKA in PRESTIGE, ne bodo nikoli več ponovile.
Resulting from this approach, the common position modifies, to a large extent, the original Commission proposal and guarantees the existence of a coherent package of measures in maritime security, a substantial step forward in ensuring that accidents such as with the ERIKA or the PRESTIGE never take place again.
Vzporedno s skupnim stališčem so vlade držav članic Evropske unije prek svojih predstavnikov potrdile svojo obvezo še z izjavo, da bodo:
In parallel to the common position, a declaration of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union confirms their commitment:
– ratificirale glavne mednarodne konvencije o pomorski varnosti do 1. januarja 2012,
– To ratify the main international conventions on maritime safety by 1 January 2012.
– uporabljale Kodeks države zastave IMO in z njim povezan sistem pregledov za pomorske uprave,
– To apply the IMO Flag State Code and the related audit scheme for maritime authorities.
– spodbujale IMO, naj poskrbi, da bosta ta dva instrumenta obvezna po vsem svetu.
– To encourage the IMO to make these two instruments mandatory worldwide.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izpolnjevanju zahtev države zastave, o katerem niso v Svetu dve leti niti razpravljali, je bil po javni politični razpravi na Svetu EU za promet aprila lanskega leta razglašen za mrtvega.
The proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on compliance with flag State requirements – for two years not even discussed in the Council – was declared "dead" after the public political debate during the EU Transport Council in April this year.
Vztrajanje Evropskega parlamenta, naj sveženj Erika III ostane enoten, je precej prispevalo k temu, da je skupno stališče naposled ugledalo luč sveta.
The European Parliament insistence of keeping the Erika III package united has significantly contributed that the common position has finally seen the light.
Poročevalec zato podpira skupno stališče, ki prispeva dodano vrednost, saj naj bi dejansko izboljšalo kakovost evropskih zastav in ustvarilo razmere za konkurenco v Skupnosti, s čimer bi zagotovili, da se zastava ne bi mogla izbirati na podlagi tega, kje je raven zahtev najnižja; poročevalec zato priporoča, da se skupno stališče sprejme brez sprememb.
Your Rapporteur supports therefore the common position which adds value as it should effectively improve the quality of European flags and provides conditions of competition in the Community which ensure that the choice of flag cannot be based on the lowest level of requirements and recommends that the common position be approved without amendments.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2006/116/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o trajanju varstva avtorske pravice in sorodnih pravic
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the term of protection of copyright and related rights
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................37
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ................................48
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0464 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0464 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 47(2), 55 in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija poslala predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0281/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 47(2), 55 and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0281/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0070/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0070/2009 ),
(5) Izvajalci običajno začnejo kariero mladi in trenutno 50-letno trajanje varstva za njihove izvedbe, posnete na fonogramih, in za fonograme pogosto izvedb ne varuje v celem njihovem življenju.
(5) Performers generally start their careers young and the current term of protection of 50 years with regard to performances fixed in phonograms and for phonograms often does not protect their performances during their entire lifetime.
Zato se izvajalci ob koncu svojega življenja soočajo z dohodkovno vrzeljo.
Therefore, performers face an income gap at the end of their lifetimes.
Pogosto tudi ne morejo uveljavljati svojih pravic, da bi preprečili ali omejili sporno uporabo izvedb v času njihovega življenja.
They are also often not able to rely on their rights to prevent or restrict objectionable uses of their performances that occur during their lifetimes.
(5) Izvajalci običajno začnejo kariero mladi in trenutno 50-letno trajanje varstva za posnetke izvedb pogosto izvedb ne varuje v celem njihovem življenju.
(5) Performers generally start their careers young and the current term of protection of 50 years with regard to the fixation of performances often does not protect their performances during their entire lifetime.
Pri spreminjanju direktive je treba priznati in upoštevati ustvarjalni prispevek vseh izvajalcev.
The creative contribution of all performers should be recognised and reflected in the modification of the directive.
(5a) Komisija bi morala začeti postopek presoje vpliva položaja evropskega avdiovizualnega sektorja, da se preuči potreba po podaljšanju trajanja varstva avtorske pravice proizvajalcev in izdajateljev v avdiovizualnem sektorju;. postopek naj bi bil dokončan do 1. januarja 2010, da bi lahko predložili predlog nove direktive še pred junijem tega leta.
(5a) The Commission should launch an impact assessment procedure in relation to the situation of the European audiovisual sector in order to consider the need for an extension of the term of protection of copyright to producers and broadcasters in the audiovisual sector ; that procedure should be completed by 1 January 2010 so that a proposal for a new directive may be presented before June 2010.