natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice bi morale redno preverjati, ali se fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo takšne aktivne snovi, lahko nadomestijo s fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, za katere je potrebno manjše zmanjšanje tveganja.
Member States should regularly re-examine whether plant protection products containing such active substances can be replaced by plant protection products containing active substances which require less risk mitigation.
(18) Nekatere aktivne snovi z določenimi lastnostmi bi bilo treba opredeliti na ravni Skupnosti kot možne snovi za zamenjavo.
(18) Some active substances with certain properties should be identified at Community level as candidates for substitution.
Države članice bi morale redno pregledovati fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo takšne snovi, da bi jih nadomestili s fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, za katere je potrebno znatno manjše zmanjšanje tveganja oziroma to sploh ni potrebno, ali z alternativnimi nekemičnimi kmetijskimi praksami in metodami za varstvo kulturnih rastlin .
Member States should regularly examine plant protection products containing such substances with the aim of replacing them by plant protection products containing active substances which require significantly less or no risk mitigation or by alternative non-chemical agricultural practices and methods of crop protection .
Če je rezultat pregleda pozitiven, je treba take aktivne snovi takoj nadomestiti.
After a positive check, such active substances should be replaced swiftly. .
(19a) Da bi spodbudili razvoj fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, je treba ustvariti spodbude za dajanje v promet sredstev z nizkim profilom tveganja ali profilom tveganja, manjšim od tistega, ki ga imajo sredstva, ki so že na trgu.
(19a) To encourage the development of plant protection products, incentives should be established for placing on the market products with a low risk profile or a risk profile that is lower than that of products already on the market.
Treba je določiti jasna in objektivna merila, katerim sredstvom se lahko določi tak profil.
Clear and objective criteria must be laid down to define which products may claim such a profile.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 12 s prve obravnave.
Reinstating first reading Amendment 12.
(20) Poleg aktivnih snovi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva vsebujejo varovala ali sinergiste, za katere bi bilo treba zagotoviti podobna pravila .
(20) In addition to active substances, plant protection products may contain safeners or synergists for which similar rules should be provided.
Določiti bi bilo treba tehnična pravila , potrebna za oceno takšnih snovi.
The technical rules necessary for the evaluation of such substances should be established.
Snovi, ki so zdaj na trgu, bi bilo treba oceniti šele po opredelitvi teh določb.
Substances currently on the market should only be evaluated after those provisions have been established.
(20) Poleg aktivnih snovi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva vsebujejo varovala ali sinergiste, za katere bi bilo treba zagotoviti podobno zakonodajo .
(20) In addition to active substances, plant protection products may contain safeners or synergists for which similar legislation should be provided.
Na podlagi zakonodajnega predloga Komisije bi bilo treba določiti določbe , potrebne za pregled takšnih snovi.
The provisions necessary for the review of such substances should be established on the basis of a legislative proposal from the Commission .
Snovi, ki so zdaj na trgu, bi bilo treba pregledati šele po opredelitvi teh določb.
Substances currently on the market should only be reviewed after those provisions have been established.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 16 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of first reading Amendment 16.
(26b) Dobro upravno sodelovanje med državami članicami bi bilo treba okrepiti na vseh stopnjah postopka registracije, evropska služba za pomoč uporabnikom pa bi ga morala olajšati.
(26b) Good administrative cooperation between Member States should be increased during all steps of the authorisation procedure and should be facilitated by a European helpdesk .
Namesto obveznega vzajemnega priznavanja s pristopom po območjih bi bilo treba poudariti izmenjavanje podatkov med državami članicami, ob izogibanju podvojenim preskusom in s splošnim izboljšanjem sodelovanja med pristojnimi organi.
Instead of compulsory mutual recognition in a zonal approach, emphasis should be put on sharing of data between Member States, avoiding duplicate testing and generally improved cooperation between the competent authorities.
Komisija bi lahko spodbujala takšno sodelovanje z ustanovitvijo službe za pomoč uporabnikom.
The Commission could facilitate such co-operation by establishing a Help-Desk unit.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 295 s prve obravnave.
Reinstating first reading Amendment 295.
(27) Načelo vzajemnega priznavanja je eno od sredstev za zagotavljanje prostega pretoka blaga v Skupnosti.
(27) The principle of mutual recognition is one of the means of ensuring the free movement of goods within the Community.
Za preprečitev podvajanja dela, zmanjšanje upravnega bremena za industrijo in države članice ter za zagotovitev bolj usklajene dostopnosti do fitofarmacevtskih sredstev bi morale registracije , ki jih izda ena država članica, sprejeti tudi druge države članice, v katerih so razmere na področju kmetijstva, zdravja rastlin in okolja (vključno s podnebjem) primerljive .
To avoid any duplication of work, to reduce the administrative burden for industry and for Member States and to provide for more harmonised availability of plant protection products, authorisations granted by one Member State should be accepted by other Member States where agricultural, plant health and environmental (including climatic) conditions are comparable .
Zato bi bilo treba Skupnost razdeliti na cone s takšnimi primerljivimi razmerami, da se olajša takšno vzajemno priznavanje.
Therefore, the Community should be divided into zones with such comparable conditions in order to facilitate such mutual recognition.
Iz okoljskih in kmetijskih razmer na ozemlju države članice bi pa morda izviralo, da države članice ob vložitvi vloge priznajo registracijo fitofarmacevtskega sredstva, ki jo je izdala druga država članica, jo spremenijo ali registracije fitofarmacevtskega sredstva na svojem ozemlju ne odobrijo, če je to upravičeno zaradi posebnih kmetijskih razmer ali , če ni mogoče doseči visoke stopnje varstva zdravja ljudi in živali ter varovanja okolja, ki jih določa ta uredba.
However, environmental or agricultural circumstances specific to the territory of a Member State might require that, on application, Member States recognise an authorisation issued by another Member State, amend it or refrain from authorising the plant protection product in their territory, if justified because of specific agricultural circumstances or if the high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment set out in this Regulation can not be achieved.
Za preprečitev nepotrebnega podvajanja dela, zmanjšanje upravnega bremena za industrijo in države članice ter za pospeševanje bolj usklajene dostopnosti do fitofarmacevtskih sredstev bi bilo treba o registracijah , ki jih izda ena država članica, obvestiti tudi druge države članice, v katerih želi vlagatelj dati sredstvo v promet .
To avoid unnecessary duplication of work, to reduce the administrative burden for industry and for Member States and to facilitate more harmonised availability of plant protection products, authorisations granted by one Member State should be notified to other Member States in which the applicant wishes to put the product on the market .
Te države članice bi morale imeti pravico, da priznajo registracijo fitofarmacevtskega sredstva, ki jo je izdala druga država članica, jo spremenijo ali registracije fitofarmacevtskega sredstva na svojem ozemlju ne odobrijo, če je to upravičeno zaradi posebnih kmetijskih ali okoljskih razmer , ki so lahko, ni pa treba, da so, omejene na to državo članico, ali če ni mogoče doseči visoke stopnje varstva zdravja ljudi ali živali ali varovanja okolja, ki jih določa ta uredba , ali zaradi ohranitve višje ravni varstva na svojem ozemlju v skladu s svojim nacionalnim akcijskim načrtom za zmanjševanje tveganj, povezanih z uporabo pesticidov, in odvisnosti od nje, sprejetim v skladu z Direktivo 2008/.../ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne ... [o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti za doseganje trajnostne uporabe pesticidov] .
Those Member States should be entitled to recognise an authorisation issued by another Member State, amend it or refrain from authorising the plant protection product in their territory, if justified because of specific agricultural or environmental circumstances that may be , but do not need to be , limited to that Member State, or if the high level of protection of human or animal health or the environment set out in this Regulation cannot be achieved, or to maintain a higher protection level in their territory in line with their national action plan to reduce the risks associated with, and dependence on, the use of pesticides, adopted in accordance with Directive 2008/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... [establishing a framework for Community action to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides] 1 .
1 UL
1 OJ
Uskladitev postopkov je sicer zaželena, vendar pri tem ne sme biti ogrožena politična suverenost držav članic.
While harmonization of the procedures is desirable, it must not come at the expense political sovereignty of Member States.
Države članice bi morale imeti pravico, da se v točno določenem obdobju odločijo, ali bodo registracijo v skladu s svojimi nacionalnimi razmerami potrdile, spremenile ali zavrnile.
Member States should be entitled to decide within a clear time period whether they confirm, amend or reject an authorization pursuant to their national situation.
Diskrecijska pravica je v skupnem stališču tako omejena, da praktično ne obstaja, in jo je zato treba razširiti.
The discretion given to Member States in the Common Position is so restrictive that it is virtually non-existent, and hence needs to be broadened.
Nadomesti predlog spremembe 16 poročevalca.
Replaces amendment 16 by the rapporteur.
(30) V izjemnih primerih bi bilo treba državam članicam dovoliti registracijo fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki niso v skladu s pogoji iz te uredbe, če je to nujno zaradi ogroženosti rastlinske pridelave, ki je ni mogoče obvladati na drugačen način.
(30) In exceptional cases, Member States should be permitted to authorise plant protection products not complying with the conditions provided for in this Regulation, where it is necessary to do so because of a danger or threat to plant production which cannot be combatted by any other means.
Takšne registracije bi bilo treba pregledati na ravni Skupnosti.
Such authorisations should be reviewed at Community level.
(30) V izjemnih primerih bi bilo treba dovoliti registracijo fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki niso v skladu s pogoji iz te uredbe, če je to nujno zaradi ogroženosti rastlinske pridelave in ekosistemov , ki jih ni mogoče obvladati na drugačen način.
(30) In exceptional cases, it should be permitted to authorise plant protection products not complying with the conditions provided for in this Regulation, where it is necessary to do so because of a danger or threat to plant production and ecosystems which cannot be contained by any other means.
Takšne začasne registracije bi bilo treba pregledati na ravni Skupnosti.
Such temporary authorisations should be reviewed at Community level.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 20 iz prve obravnave.
.Reinstatement of first reading Amendment 20.
(33) Za zagotovitev visoke ravni zdravstvenega varstva ljudi in okolja je potrebna pravilna uporaba fitofarmacevtskih sredstev ob upoštevanju načel integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivci.
(33) In order to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, plant protection products should be used properly having regard to the principles of integrated pest management.
Svet bi moral v predpisane zahteve ravnanja iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete , vključiti načela integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivci, vključno z dobro prakso varstva rastlin.
The Council should include in the statutory management requirement referred to in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers the principles of integrated pest management, including good plant protection practice.
(33) Za zagotovitev visoke ravni zdravstvenega varstva ljudi in okolja je potrebna ustrezna uporaba fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v skladu z njihovo registracijo ob upoštevanju načel integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivci in dajanju prednosti nekemičnim in naravnim alternativam, kjer je to mogoče .
(33) In order to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, plant protection products should be used properly , in accordance with their authorisation, having regard to the principles of integrated pest management and giving priority to non-chemical and natural alternatives wherever possible.
Svet bi moral v predpisane zahteve ravnanja iz Priloge III k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete vključiti načela integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivci, vključno z dobro prakso varstva rastlin in nekemičnimi metodami za zaščito rastlin, zatiranje škodljivcev in pridelavo kulturnih rastlin .
The Council should include in the statutory management requirement referred to in Annex III of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers the principles of integrated pest management, including good plant protection practice and non-chemical methods of plant protection and pest and crop management .
Zato je treba predvideti prehodno obdobje, v katerem bodo države članice lahko vzpostavile potrebne strukture, da se uporabnikom fitofarmacevtskih sredstev omogoči uporaba načel integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivci in nekemičnih alternativ za zaščito rastlin ter zatiranje škodljivcev in pridelavo kulturnih rastlin.
A transitional period should therefore be provided for to allow Member States to put in place the necessary structures to enable users of plant protection products to apply the principles of integrated pest management and non-chemical alternatives to plant protection and pest and crop management .
Vedno bi bilo treba dati prednost nekemičnim metodam zatiranja škodljivcev kot edini resnični preprečevalni in trajnostni rešitvi, ki je bolj v skladu s cilji trajnostnega varstva kulturnih rastlin kot zanašanje na kompleksne kemikalije, namenjene ubijanju rastlin, insektov ali drugih oblik življenja, ki se ne morejo uvrstiti med trajnostne.
The priority should always be given to non-chemical methods of pest management as the only truly preventative and sustainable solution which is more in line with the objectives for sustainable crop protection, than the reliance on complex chemicals designed to kill plants, insects or other forms of life, which cannot be classified as sustainable.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 21 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of first reading Amendment 21.
(37) Študije so velika naložba.
(37) Studies represent a major investment.
To naložbo bi bilo treba zaščititi, da se spodbudijo raziskave.
This investment should be protected in order to stimulate research.
Zato bi bilo treba študije, ki jih vlagatelj predloži državi članici, zaščititi pred uporabo drugega vlagatelja.
For this reason, studies lodged by one applicant with a Member State should be protected against use by another applicant.
Vendar pa bi ta zaščita morala biti časovno omejena, da se omogoči konkurenca.
This protection should, however, be limited in time in order to allow competition.
Prav tako bi morala biti omejena na študije, ki so resnično nujne za regulativne namene, da se prepreči, da bi vlagatelji s predložitvijo novih študij, ki niso nujne, umetno podaljševali obdobje zaščite.
It should also be limited to studies which are genuinely necessary for regulatory purposes, to avoid applicants artificially extending the period of protection by submitting new studies which are not necessary.
Zato bi bilo treba študije, ki jih vlagatelj predloži državi članici, razen tistih, ki vključujejo preskuse na vretenčarjih in drugih, ki lahko preprečujejo preskuse na živalih, zaščititi pred uporabo drugega vlagatelja.
For this reason, studies , other than those involving tests on vertebrate animals and other studies that may prevent animal testing, lodged by one applicant with a Member State should be protected against use by another applicant.
Pojasniti je treba, da bi moralo biti varstvo podatkov omejeno tudi zaradi preprečevanja preskusov na živalih.
It should be clarified that data protection should be limited also in order to avoid animal testing.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 23 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of first reading Amendment 23.
(38) Določiti bi bilo treba pravila za preprečevanje podvajanja preskusov in študij.
(38) Rules should be laid down to avoid duplication of tests and studies.
Zlasti bi bilo treba prepovedati ponovitve študij, ki vključujejo vretenčarje.
In particular, repetition of studies involving vertebrates should be prohibited.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba sprejeti obveznost, da se pod razumnimi pogoji omogoči dostop do študij o vretenčarjih.
In this context, there should be an obligation to allow access to studies on vertebrates on reasonable terms.
Da se omogoči seznanjenost gospodarskih subjektov s tem, katere študije so bile izvedene, bi morale države članice hraniti seznam teh študij , čeprav niso vključene v zgoraj navedeni sistem obveznega dostopa.
In order to allow operators to know what studies have been carried out by others, Member States should keep a list of such studies even where they are not covered by the above system of compulsory access.
V zvezi s tem je treba sprejeti obveznost, da se omogoči dostop do študij o vretenčarjih in drugih študij, s katerimi se lahko preprečujejo preskusi na živalih .
In this context, there should be an obligation to allow access to studies on vertebrates and other studies that may prevent animal testing.
Da se omogoči seznanjenost gospodarskih subjektov s tem, katere študije so bile izvedene, bi morale države članice vse take študije poslati Agenciji , čeprav niso vključene v zgoraj navedeni sistem obveznega dostopa.
In order to allow operators to know what studies have been carried out by others, Member States should forward to the Authority all such studies even where they are not covered by the above system of compulsory access .
Agencija bi morala vzpostaviti osrednjo bazo podatkov o teh študijah.
The Authority should establish a central database for such studies .
Ker lahko študije, razen tistih o vretenčarjih, preprečujejo preskuse na živalih, jih je treba prav tako vključiti v to izjavo.
As other studies than those on vertebrates may also prevent animal testing they should be included here as well.
Zaradi lažje izmenjave podatkov je treba vzpostaviti osrednjo bazo podatkov, ki bi jo vodila Evropska agencija za varnost hrane in bi obsegala vse informacije o preskusih in študijah, ki so bili predhodno izvedeni za namene te uredbe.
In order to facilitate data sharing it is necessary to establish one central database with all the information on tests and studies carried out previously for the purposes of this Regulation, managed by the EFSA.
Potem bi lahko vlagatelji pred izvedbo preskusa ali študije pregledali eno samo bazo.
Applicants would then have to consult only one database before carrying out any tests or studies.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 24 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of first reading Amendment 24.
(41) Za zagotovitev, da oglasi ne zavajajo uporabnikov fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, je primerno določiti pravila o oglaševanju teh sredstev.
(41) To ensure that advertisements do not mislead users of plant protection products, it is appropriate to lay down rules on the advertising of those products.
(41) Za zagotovitev, da oglasi ne zavajajo uporabnikov fitofarmacevtskih sredstev ali javnosti , je primerno določiti pravila o oglaševanju teh sredstev.
(41) To ensure that advertisements do not mislead users of plant protection products or the public, it is appropriate to lay down rules on the advertising of those products.
Oglasi za pesticide in pesticidne proizvode ne smejo zavajati uporabnikov ali javnosti.
Advertisements regarding pesticides and pesticide products must not mislead users or the public.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 26 s prve obravnave.
Reinstating first reading Amendment 26.
(43a) Izvajalci morajo imeti enake možnosti dostopa do trga, omogočiti je treba zlasti dejavnost malih in srednjih podjetij, da se kmetom zagotovi, da imajo na voljo dovolj varnih in učinkovitih fitofarmacevtskih sredstev.
(4 3a ) Operators must have the same opportunities in respect of market access, in particular so that small and medium-sized enterprises can operate, in order to ensure that sufficient safe and effective plant protection products are available to farmers.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 29 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of first reading Amendment 29.
(44a) Administrativno breme za kmete bi moralo biti čim manjše.
(4 4a ) The bureaucratic burden on farmers should be as limited as possible.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 31 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of first reading Amendment 31.
(45) Zagotoviti bi bilo treba čim boljšo uskladitev s preostalo zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti z Uredbo (ES) št. 396/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. februarja 2005 o mejnih vrednostih ostankov pesticidov v ali na hrani in krmi rastlinskega in živalskega izvora , ter zakonodajo Skupnosti o varstvu delavcev in kogar koli v zvezi z omejeno uporabo in namernim sproščanjem gensko spremenjenih organizmov.
(45) Close coordination should be ensured with other Community legislation, in particular Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin, and with Community legislation on the protection of workers and anyone concerned with the contained use and deliberate release of genetically modified organisms.
(45) Ukrepi iz te uredbe bi se morali uporabljati brez poseganja v obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti ne v Direktivo 2008/.../ES [o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti za doseganje trajnostne rabe pesticidov], Direktivo 2000/60/ES , Uredbo (ES) št. 396/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. februarja 2005 o mejnih vrednostih ostankov pesticidov v ali na hrani in krmi rastlinskega in živalskega izvora 2 ter zakonodajo Skupnosti o varstvu delavcev in kogar koli v zvezi z omejeno uporabo in namernim sproščanjem gensko spremenjenih organizmov.
(45) The measures provided for in this Regulation should apply without prejudice to existing Community legislation, in particular Directive 2008/.../EC [establishing a framework for Community action to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides], Directive 2000/60/EC, Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residues levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin 2 and Community legislation on the protection of workers and anyone concerned with the contained use and deliberate release of genetically modified organisms.
+ UL: prosimo, vstavite številko.
+ OJ: please insert number
2 UL L 70, 16.3.2005, str.
2 OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p.
Ponovna vložitev predloga spremembe 32 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of first reading Amendment 32.