natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izvedbene direktive za Direktivo 92/34/EGS, ki jo je treba razveljaviti, se izvajajo do sprejetja novih direktiv.
The implementing directives of Directive 92/34 which is to be abolished shall continue to apply until new directives are adopted.
Začetek veljavnosti nove direktive, ki je določen za dvajseti dan po sprejetju (člen 23), ne zagotavlja dovolj časa za sprejetje novih izvedbenih uredb.
The entry into force of the new directive on the twentieth day after adoption (Article 23) leaves no time for adopting new implementing regulations.
Zato je treba podaljšati veljavnost izvedbenih direktiv Direktive 92/34, da se zagotovi pravna podlaga.
Provision therefore must be made for extending the validity of implementing directives of Directive 92/34 so as to provide a legal basis.
Pridelava sadnih rastlin je zelo dinamično področje kmetijstva Skupnosti.
(a) The cultivation of fruit plants is a very dynamic area of Community agriculture.
Pomološke raziskave, ki jih je leta 2002 izvedel Eurostat, zagotavljajo statistične podatke, ki kažejo, da je 8,9 milijona hektarov v EU-15 zasajenih s sadnimi rastlinami.
Pomological research carried out by Eurostat in 2002, provides statistics showing that some 8.9 million hectares in EU-15 are planted with fruit plants.
Pomembna je tudi razporeditev teh območij v EU: 87,5 % je v štirih državah članicah (41,8 % v Španiji, 28 % v Italiji, 9,1 % v Grčiji in 8,6 % v Franciji), preostalih 12,5 % pa je v drugih državah članicah.
It is also important to note the distribution of these areas within the EU: 87.5% of these areas are concentrated in four Member States (41.8% in Spain, 28.0% in Italy, 9.1% in Greece and 8.6% in France), with only 12.5% in the other Member States.
V novih državah članicah je področje pridelave manjšega jagodičevja izredno uspešno in pokriva približno 1,5 milijona hektarov, od katerih je 1,3 milijona hektarov na Poljskem.
For the new Member States, the cultivation of small soft fruit is an exceptionally important area of production, and covers some 1.5 million hectares, including 1.3 million hectares in Poland alone.
Razmnoževalni material sadnih rastlin je bistvenega pomena za pridelovalce.
B) Propagating material for fruit plants is of key importance for producers.
Medtem ko je povpraševanje po zdravem in certificiranem materialu upravičeno, je treba na primer pri okrasnih rastlinah, ki so običajno enoletne, in tudi pri gozdnih rastlinah (nedavno je bila dana pobuda za posodobitev pravnega okvira za te kategorije rastlin) veliko previdneje obravnavati vprašanje pregledov ureditev, ki urejajo razmnoževalni material sadnih rastlin.
While demand for healthy and certified material is justified, for ornamental plants, for example, which are usually annuals and even for forest plants - categories of plant for which an updating of the legal framework was recently deemed necessary -, the question of revising the arrangements governing the propagating material for fruit plants must be treated with much greater circumspection.
Pridelava razmnoževalnega materiala je pomembna dejavnost v Španiji (približno 590 milijonov rastlin), Italiji (360 milijonov rastlin), na Nizozemskem (240 milijonov rastlin), v Franciji (140 milijonov rastlin) in v Združenem kraljestvu, ki prideluje razmnoževalni material na 29 000 hektarih.
C) The production of propagating material is an important activity in Spain (with some 590 million plants), Italy (360 million plants), the Netherlands (240 million plants), France (140 million plants) and the United Kingdom which has 29 000 hectares producing propagating material.
Povpraševanje po certificiranem razmnoževalnem materialu iz teh držav in sadnih rastlinah neprestano narašča, medtem ko je tudi uvoz iz tretjih držav vse prej kot zanemarljiv.
Demand for certified propagating material from these countries, and fruit plants is inexorably rising, and substantial amounts are imported from third countries.
Direktiva 92/34/EGS o trženju razmnoževalnega materiala sadnih rastlin in sadnih rastlin, namenjenih za pridelavo sadja, se je od sprejetja leta 1992 uporabljala kot instrument za doseganje čim večje uskladitve v tem sektorju v EU.
Since 1992 when Directive 92/34 on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production was adopted, it has acted as an instrument to achieve maximum harmonisation in this sector within the EU.
Vendar so se v 15 letih razmere spremenile, zato se zdaj zdi ponovna preučitev direktive nujna za pojasnitev in poenostavitev v skladu z reformami skupne kmetijske politike iz leta 2003 in leta 2004.
However, in the interviewing 15 years, conditions have changed, and it is now thought indispensable to re-examine the Directive with the aim of clarifying and simplifying it in the light of the CAP reforms of 2003 and 2004.
Zlasti so prisotna prizadevanja za izboljšanje zakonodajnega okvira, v skladu s katerim se izvaja trgovinska dejavnost, na podlagi znanstvenega razvoja in novega pristopa, ki je bil sprejet s skupno kmetijsko politiko za povečevanje konkurenčnosti kmetijstva Skupnosti na eni in varstvom okolja z zmanjšanjem uporabe pesticidov na drugi strani.
In particular, an attempt is being made to improve the legislative framework within which this commercial activity takes place, on the basis of scientific developments and the new approach adopted by the CAP which aims, on the one hand, to boost the competitiveness of Community agriculture and, on the other, to protect the environment by reducing the use of pesticides.
Vsebina predloga
The content of the proposal
Pobuda za preoblikovanje Direktive 92/34/EGS je bila sprejeta leta 2004.
The initiative to recast Directive 92/34 was launched in 2004.
Pozornost je bila usmerjena k potrebi po uskladitvi opredelitev in splošne terminologije z nedavno pregledanimi direktivami o trženju razmnoževalnega materiala okrasnih rastlin (Direktiva 98/56/ES), o trženju gozdnega reprodukcijskega materiala (Direktiva 99/105/ES) in o trženju materiala za vegetativno razmnoževanje trte (Direktiva 2002/11/ES).
Attention focused on the need to bring the definitions and terminology in general in line with the recently revised directives on the marketing of propagating material of ornamental plants (Directive 98/56), on the marketing of forestry productive material (Directive 99/105) and on the marketing of material for vegetative propagation of the vine (Directive 2002/11).
Pri pripravi zakonodajnega predloga so bile obravnavane štiri možnosti:
In preparing for the legislative proposal, the following four options were examined:
A) razveljavitev obstoječe zakonodaje , pri čemer bi obstajalo tveganje, da bi različni pristopi v državah članicah povzročili nasprotja na notranjem trgu;
A) Repealing the existing legislation : there was a risk that different approaches in the Member States could create conflict in the internal market;
B) ohranitev obstoječe zakonodaje , ki pa je zaradi navedenih razlogov obravnavana kot zastarela.
B) No action: keeping the existing legislation : However this is deemed obsolete for the above reasons:
C) r eforma sektorja in doseganje ravnotežja, ki ga narekujejo tržne sile.
C) Alternative regulation of the sector and achieving a balance through market forces.
Ta možnost se ne šteje za realno zaradi posebne organizacije tega sektorja, v katerem deluje veliko strokovnjakov, ki nimajo enake želje po prevladi na trgu; in
This option is not regarded as realistic, owing to the particular organisation of this sector in which many professionals are active, without however having the same scope to dominate the market; and
D) poenostavitev obstoječe zakonodaje s preoblikovanjem Direktive 92/34/EGS.
D) Simplification of existing legislation through the recasting of Directive 92/34/EEC.
Na koncu je bila izbrana zadnja možnost, ker zagotavlja preglednost in učinkovitost delovanja trga.
This last option was ultimately chosen since it ensures transparency and effectiveness in the operation of the market.
Ta cilj bo dosežen s sprejetjem usklajenega postopka certificiranja za razmnoževalni material in ustvarjanjem pravne podlage, ki bo zagotovila boljša jamstva glede istovetnosti sorte in materiala na trgu.
This objective will be reached with the adoption of a harmonised procedure for propagating material certification and the creation of a legal basis which will provide increased guarantees for the identification of the varieties and material on the market.
Izvedbene direktive bodo vključevale tudi več podrobnih pravil, ki bodo izboljšala usklajenost in upravljanje sektorja.
At the same time implementing directives will contain many detailed rules, thereby ensuring grater harmonisation and management of the sector.
Predlog Direktive Sveta o trženju razmnoževalnega materiala sadnih rastlin in sadnih rastlin, namenjenih za pridelavo sadja, je potreben za razvoj v tem sektorju.
The proposal for a Council directive on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production is necessary in order to address developments in this sector.
Prednosti predloga vključujejo: (a) uvedbo nove opredelitve pojma „trženje“, ki zajema vse podjetniške dejavnosti, ki vključujejo trženje razmnoževalnega programa in sadnih rastlin, (b) razširitev opredelitve pojma „dobavitelj“, ki vključuje uvoznika, (c) izvajanje potrjevanja v skladu z mednarodnimi sistemi potrjevanja in določanja istovetnosti sort na podlagi protokolov Urada Skupnosti za sorte rastlin in smernic za varstvo novih sort rastlin ter (d) preučitev zdravstvenega stanja rastlin v skladu z določbami iz Direktive 2000/29/ES.
The positive points of the proposal include: (a) the introduction of a new definition for marketing which covers all entrepreneurial activities involving the marketing of propagating material and fruit plants, (b) the extension of the definition of 'supplier' to include the importer, (c) the implementation of certification in accordance with international systems of certification and identification of varieties based on the protocols of the Community Plant Variety Office and the guidelines for the protection of New Varieties of Plant and (d) an examination of plant health issues in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2000/29.
Poročevalec želi pozornost usmeriti tudi k opredelitvi „sorte“ in „klona“ ter k sklicevanju na izraz „pomološka lastnost“ glede na pridelek rastlin in kakovost sadja, čeprav je tu prisoten subjektivni element.
Your rapporteur would also like to draw attention to the definitions of 'variety' and 'clone' and the reference to the term 'pomological value' in respect of the yield of plants and the quality of fruit, although an element of subjectivity is involved here.
Različne razmere v posameznih državah članicah bi ovirale zagotovitev objektivnosti pri ocenjevanju pomološke lastnosti.
The different conditions obtaining in individual Member States would make it difficult to ensure objectivity in evaluating pomological value.
Pravna podlaga te direktive je člen 37 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ki ne predvideva načela subsidiarnosti.
The legal basis of the directive is Article 37 of the Treaty establishing the European Community which rules out the principle of subsidiarity.
Predlog je v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti, kar pomeni, da predlog ne presega okvirov, ki so potrebni za dosego ciljev; upravna obremenitev nacionalnih organov in organov Skupnosti je majhna.
However, it complies with the principle of proportionality which means that the proposal does not go beyond what is deemed in dispensable to achieve its objectives; the administrative burden for the national and Community authorities is limited.
Ta direktiva pa tudi ne vpliva bistveno na proračun Skupnosti.
Finally, this directive has no substantial impact on the Community budget.
Posebne opombe
Special comments
A) Poročevalec meni, da postopek preoblikovanja Direktive 92/34/EGS, ki ga je Komisija izbrala namesto pregleda, znatno omejuje možnosti za bistvene spremembe.
A) Your rapporteur takes the view that the procedure of recasting the existing Directive 92/34 - the procedure chosen by the Commission instead of revision - significantly restricts the scope for substantive changes.
To zlasti pomeni, da lahko Parlament in Svet spreminjata in predlagata izboljšanja le na tistih področjih, na katerih je Komisija že posredovala za spremembo prvotnega besedila (obarvano s sivo v predlogu direktive).
In particular, this means that Parliament and Council may only make changes and suggest improvements in respect of points where the Commission itself has intervened to correct the original (shaded in grey in the proposal for a directive).
Vseeno glede nekaterih področij poročevalec meni, da je potrebno več poseganja in da je vredno preučiti ostala področja direktive, za zagotovitev celovite zakonodaje o trženju razmnoževalnega materiala in sadnih rastlin.
However, at some points where your rapporteur deemed it necessary he has gone a little further, taking the view that it was worth examining other areas of the directive so as to obtain integrated legislation on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants.
Upa, da bo Komisija soglašala, kar je seveda pogoj za sprejetje na podlagi postopka preoblikovanja.
He hopes that the Commission will give its consent, this being, of course, a precondition for adoption under the recasting procedure.
B) Po preučitvi predloga Komisije za preoblikovanje direktive poročevalec sklepa, da ni bil popolnoma uspešen pri usklajevanju tega predloga z ustreznimi direktivami o razmnoževalnem materialu za druge kategorije, kot je trta, kljub dejstvu, da je eden od zastavljenih ciljev preoblikovane direktive omogočanje uskladitve te direktive z drugimi direktivami o trženju razmnoževalnega materiala, ki so bile nedavno spremenjene v okviru nove skupne kmetijske politike.
B) After examining the Commission's proposal for recasting the directive, your rapporteur concludes that it has not been fully successful in aligning this proposal with corresponding directives on propagating material for other categories, for example vine, despite the fact that one of the declared objectives of the recast directive is to 'permit the harmonisation of this Directive with the other Directives on the marketing of propagating material which have recently been amended in the framework of the new Common Agricultural Policy'.
Dobro je znano, da so v trženje razmnoževalnega materiala različnih kategorij pogosto vključeni isti dobavitelji in da je uporaba različnih pravil za vsako kategorijo izredno zapletena.
It is well known that the same suppliers often are involved in marketing propagating material of different categories, and it is an appallingly complex task for them to apply the different rules applicable to each category.
Poleg tega bi bil tak pristop popolnoma v nasprotju s ciljem Komisije o poenostavitvi zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Besides, such an approach would be totally antithetical to the Commission's objective of simplifying Community legislation.
C) Trženje materiala CAC (minimalni standardi Skupnosti) je zaželena in se ustrezno vzdržuje, ker ima v EU lasten trg.
C) The marketing of CAC material (minimum Community standards) is desirable and is rightly maintained, since it has its own market in the EU.
Vseeno ga je treba jasno razlikovati od certificiranega materiala in opredeliti v direktivi glede kakovosti in zdravja rastlin.
However, it must be clearly distinguished from certified material, and it must also be upgraded in the directive from the point of view of quality and plant health.
Zahtevane preglede je treba izvajati v obliki pregledov na kraju samem in ne nujno v obliki celovitih pregledov pred trženjem, kot je bilo predlagano, saj bi to povzročilo težave pri preskrbi trga.
The requisite checks should take the form of spot checks and not necessarily comprehensive checks before marketing, as has been proposed, because this would create market supply problems.
D) Stalna odstopanja v zvezi z uvozom iz tretjih držav zmanjšujejo učinkovitost tega sistema in, kar je še pomembneje, pomenijo, da obstaja nevarnost širitve patogenih organizmov v EU.
D) As far as imports are concerned, the constant derogations accorded to imports from third countries are undermining this system, but, more importantly, mean that there is a danger of pathogens being spread within the EU.
Zato se predlaga, da se dobavitelji iz tretjih držav vpišejo v register, pri čemer je treba zagotoviti nadzor.
It is therefore proposed that third country suppliers should be entered in a register and the provisions should be made for controls.
E) Poročevalec v zvezi z gensko spremenjenimi organizmi predlaga, da jih je treba uporabljati le kot podlago, na katero se bodo cepile zahtevane sorte, in le po izvedbi ocenjevalnih študij, da se omejijo nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi in okolja, pri čemer je treba pojasniti namen genskih sprememb.
E) As regards genetically modified organisms, your rapporteur proposes that they should be used only as stock onto which the required varieties are to be grafted and only after evaluation studies have been carried out to limit the hazards for human health and the environment, while at the same time clarifying the purpose of genetic modification.
F) Osnovni element je zadovoljivo certificiranje trženega materiala na osnovi določb, ki jih je treba vključiti v to direktivo.
F) A basic element is the correct certification of marketed material through provisions to be contained in the directive.
Razmnoževalni material in sadne rastline je treba med pakiranjem, skladiščenjem, prevozom in reprodukcijo shranjevati v ločenih lotih in jih ustrezno označiti, da se zagotovi sledljivost.
Propagating material and fruit plants, during packaging, storage, transport and reproduction, must be kept in separate lots and appropriately labelled so as to ensure traceability.
G) Ostala vprašanja, ki jih obravnava poročevalec, so: potreba po registraciji trženih sort na sezname, ki jih zainteresirane strani lahko uporabijo kot referenčno točko, vnos imen dobaviteljev v uradne registre ter možnost izvajanja nadzora uradnih organov zadevne države članice, ki morajo imeti vse pristojnosti za spremljanje.
G) Other issues addressed by your rapporteur are: the need to register marketed varieties in lists so that they can be used as a reference point for stakeholders, the entry of suppliers' names in official registers, and the possibility of conducting controls by the official authorities of the Member State concerned which must be solely responsible for supervision.
Pomembni področji sta možnost za zaščito poklica agronoma in potreba po zaposlovanju specializiranega osebja v podjetjih v tem sektorju, da bi se vprašanja v zvezi z razmnoževalnim materialom ustrezno reševala.
An important point is the opportunity provided to safeguard the profession of agronomist and the need to employ specialised personnel in undertakings in this branch so as to address issues raised by propagating material in a responsible manner.
H) V zvezi s komitologijo se ne sme sprejeti ničesar, kar bi zmanjšalo vlogo Stalnega odbora za razmnoževalni program in rastline sadnih rodov in vrst, ker je bil njegov dosedanji prispevek k obravnavanju posebnih značilnosti tega sektorja zelo konstruktiven.
H) Finally, as regarding comitology, nothing must be done to undermine the role of the Standing Committee on Propagating Material and Plants of Fruit Genera and Species, because its contribution so far has been shown to be very constructive in addressing the specific features of this sector.
ODBOR ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE
COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS
Predsednik Odbora za kmetijstvo
Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture
in razvoj podeželja
and Rural Development
Zadeva : Predlog Direktive Sveta o trženju razmnoževalnega materiala sadnih rastlin in sadnih rastlin, namenjenih za pridelavo sadja ( 2007/0014(CNS) ) (preoblikovano)
Subject : Proposal for a Council directive on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production ( 2007/0014(CNS) ) (recast)
Odbor za pravne zadeve, ki ga imam čast predsedovati, je preučil zgoraj omenjeni predlog v skladu s členom 80a o preoblikovanju, ki ga je Parlament vključil v svoj poslovnik s sklepom iz 10. maja 2007.
The Committee on Legal Affairs, which I am honoured to chair, has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to Rule 80a on Recasting, as introduced into the Parliament's Rules of Procedure by its Decision of 10 May 2007.
Odstavek 3 tega člena se glasi:
Paragraph 3 of that Rule reads as follows:
"Če odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve, meni, da predlog ne vsebuje vsebinskih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so bile opredeljene kot take, o tem obvesti pristojni odbor.
"If the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal does not entail any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal, it shall inform the committee responsible.
Vendar lahko predloge sprememb za dele, ki ostajajo nespremenjeni, izjemoma sprejme posamično predsednik tega odbora, če meni, da to zahtevata nujna skladnost besedila ali povezanost z drugimi dopustnimi predlogi sprememb.
However, amendments to the parts which have remained unchanged may be admitted by way of exception and on a case-by-case basis by the chairman of the above committee if he considers that this is necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text or because the amendments are inextricably linked to other admissible amendments.
Razloga morata biti navedena v pisni obrazložitvi predlogov sprememb."
Such reasons must be stated in a written justification to the amendments".
Ob upoštevanju mnenja pravne službe, katere predstavniki so sodelovali na sestankih posvetovalne delovne skupine, ki je obravnavala predlog za preoblikovanje, in v skladu s priporočili poročevalca Odbor za pravne zadeve meni, da obravnavani predlog ne vključuje nobenih vsebinskih sprememb razen tistih, ki so bile opredeljene kot take v predlogu, glede kodifikacije nespremenjenih določb prejšnjega akta s spremembami pa predlog vsebuje neposredno kodifikacijo obstoječih besedil, ne da bi kakorkoli spreminjal njihovo vsebino.
Following the opinion of the Legal Service, whose representatives participated in the meetings of the Consultative Working Party examining the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the draftsperson, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that the proposal in question does not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those changes, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Odbor za pravne zadeve na koncu priporoča vašemu odboru, kot pristojnemu odboru, naj zgornji predlog obravnava v skladu s členom 80a.
In conclusion, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends your Committee, as the committee responsible, to proceed to examine the above proposal in accordance with Rule 80a.
Lep pozdrav,
Yours faithfully,
Trženje razmnoževalnega materiala sadnih rastlin in sadnih rastlin, namenjenih za pridelavo sadja (spremenjena različica)
Marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production (recast version)
o davčni obravnavi izgub v čezmejnih primerih
on Tax Treatment of Losses in Cross-Border Situations
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................13
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................13
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o davčni obravnavi izgub v čezmejnih primerih ( KOM(2006)0824 ,
– having regard to the Commission communication on Tax Treatment of Losses in Cross-Border Situations ( COM(2006)0824 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o prispevku obdavčevanja in carinskih politik k lizbonski strategiji ( KOM(2005)0532 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on The Contribution of Taxation and Customs Policies to the Lisbon Strategy' ( COM(2005)0532 ),