natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
33. poziva Komisijo, naj začne posebno kampanjo ozaveščanja, ki se bo osredotočala na primerjalne prednosti in dodano vrednost novih držav članic v zvezi z vprašanji razvoja in sodelovanja;
Calls on the Commission to launch a specific awareness-raising campaign focusing on the comparative advantages and added value of the new Member States with regard to cooperation and development issues;
38. ugotavlja, da so povezave med zasebnim sektorjem in razvojnim sodelovanjem zelo obetavne za nove države članice in da bi lahko dejavnejše sodelovanje zasebnih podjetij iz teh držav pri javnih naročilih za projekte razvojnega sodelovanja povečalo ozaveščenost o razvojnem sodelovanju;
38 Notes that the links between the private sector and development cooperation constitute a promising new avenue for the new Member States, and that a more active participation on the part of private undertakings from those Member States in the procurement of development cooperation projects at EU level could raise awareness of development cooperation;
Zavezanost Evropske unije razvoju je že izražena v pogodbi o ES, kar se od sprejetja razvojnih ciljev tisočletja v letu 2000 pa še dosledneje in učinkoviteje upošteva.
The European Union's commitment to development already figured in the EC Treaty, and since then has been followed more consistently and effectively with the adoption of the Millennium Development Goals in 2000.
Na srečanju voditeljev držav v Barceloni leta 2002 so se države članice (vključno z državami, ki so leta 2004 postale članice) zavezale, da bodo povečale svoje prispevke bruto nacionalnega dohodka, da bo skupna uradna razvojna pomoč EU dosegla delež 0,7 %.
At the Barcelona Summit in 2002, Member States (including the soon-to-be members who joined in 2004) committed themselves to raise their GNI contribution so that the total EU ODA would reach 0.7%.
Poleg tega je evropsko soglasje o razvoju, podpisano leta 2005, EU omogočilo skupno vizijo glede vrednot, ciljev in sredstev za razvoj.
Furthermore, the European Consensus on Development signed in 2005, provided the EU with a common vision in terms of values, goals and resources for development.
Namen tega poročila je analizirati sedanje stanje razvojnega sodelovanja v novih državah članicah, vključno z ustreznimi institucijami, tematskimi programi in ciljnimi državami, pa tudi njihovimi finančnimi prispevki.
This report analyses the current state of development cooperation in the new Member States, including relevant institutions, thematic programmes and targeted countries as well as their financial contributions.
Nove države članice se zaradi skupne zgodovine in geografskega položaja pogosto osredotočijo na svoje neposredne sosede.
Due to their shared history and geographical location, the new Member States often focus on their immediate neighbours.
Ker je zadnja širitev precej preoblikovala meje EU, je v poročilu poudarjena pomembnost odnosa med novimi državami članicami in novimi vzhodnimi sosedami EU.
Because the last round of enlargement considerably shaped the EU's borders, this report stresses the importance of the relationship between the new Member States and the EU's new eastern neighbours.
Zaradi zgodovinskih, kulturnih in geografskih razlogov Ciper in Malta nista bila vključena v to analizo.
For historical, cultural and geographical reasons, Cyprus and Malta were not included in this analysis.
Evropsko razvojno sodelovanje temelji na odnosih z afriškimi, karibskimi in pacifiškimi državami, ki so se spletli leta 1959 s sporazumi iz Yaoundéja, ki jih je kasneje nadomestila konvencija iz Yaoundéja, ki je ostala v veljavi do leta 1975.
European Development Cooperation builds on relationships with ACP countries which started in 1959 with the Yaoundé Agreements, later known as the Yaoundé Convention which lasted until 1975.
Sledila ji je konvencija iz Loméja, ki jo je nadomestil cotonoujski sporazum, podpisan leta 2000.
It was followed by the Lomé Convention and then by the Cotonou Agreement, signed in 2000.
Evropska unija državam AKP nudi finančno pomoč prek novoustanovljenega instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje, Evropskega razvojnega sklada in proračuna EU.
The European Union provides financial assistance to African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (ACP) through the newly established Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) and the European Development Fund.
Instrument za razvojno sodelovanje bo v obdobju 2007–2013 zajemal skoraj 17 milijard EUR.
The DCI amounts to almost EUR 17 billion for the 2007-13 period.
Ta sredstva se dodajo 22,7 milijardam EUR (deseti evropski razvojni sklad), ki so bila dodeljena državam AKP za obdobje 2008–2013, kar brez nacionalnih prispevkov držav članic znaša skoraj 40 milijard EUR.
These funds come in addition to EUR 22.7 (10th EDF) billion agreed specifically for ACP countries over the 2008-13 period, bringing the total - not including Member States' national contributions - to almost EUR 40 billion in new Community funding.
EU lahko skupaj z novimi državami članicami okrepi svojo vlogo največje donatorice razvojne pomoči.
Together with the new Member States, the EU can strengthen its role as the number one donor of development aid.
Zgodovinsko gledano so nekatere nove države članice že imele razvojne programe z afriškimi državami, kar je vplivalo na njihovo strategijo razvojnega sodelovanja, na primer Češka republika z Angolo in Zambijo, Madžarska z Etiopijo ali Slovaška s Kenijo.
Historically, some of the new Member States already had development programmes with African countries which influenced their new development cooperation strategies, such as for example the Czech Republic with Angola and Zambia, Hungary with Ethiopia, or Slovakia with Kenya.
Vendar se je drugim zaradi političnega prehoda težje opirati na stare vezi in morajo vzpostaviti nacionalne razvojne strategije iz nič, tako kot Romunija in Bolgarija.
For others, however, political transition made it more difficult to rely on old bonds and they have had to build national development strategies from the scratch, like Bulgaria and Romania.
Da bi dosegli razvojne cilje tisočletja, je v evropskem soglasju o razvoju zahtevano povečanje prispevkov za razvojno sodelovanje.
The European Consensus on Development requires the increase of the financial contributions to DC, in order to achieve the Millennium Development Goals.
Evropsko soglasje o razvoju opozarja nove države članice, naj usmerjajo svoje razvojno sodelovanje v Afriko, vendar jih ne obvezuje k temu, čeprav bi morale stare države članice novim pomagati pri sodelovanju z afriškimi državami.
The European Consensus on Development provides an impetus, but does not oblige new Member States to target their development cooperation towards Africa, although old Member States should help the new Member States to collaborate with African countries.
Jasno je videti, da se nove države članice lotevajo vzpostavljanja potrebnega pravnega okvira in pravnih poti, da bi institucionalizirale razvojno sodelovanje.
One can clearly see that the new Member States are engaged in building the necessary legal framework and channels in order to institutionalise development co-operation.
Njihovo razvojno sodelovanje je v veliki meri usmerjeno k njihovim neposrednim sosedom, kjer lahko s pridom uporabijo lastne izkušnje iz preteklosti in strokovno znanje, pridobljeno pri prehodu.
The development cooperation of the new Member States is largely directed at their immediate neighbours where they benefit from their historical experiences and 'transition expertise'.
Glavni cilji so sosede, ki imajo enake zgodovinske izkušnje, na primer Kirgizistan, Kazahstan, Tadžikistan, Moldavija in Gruzija.
The main targets are neighbours who share their historical experience - examples are Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Moldova, Georgia.
Nove države članice se med šestimi od nedavnega neodvisnimi državami (Armenija, Azerbajdžan, Belorusija, Gruzija, Moldavija, Ukrajina) največkrat usmerjajo na Moldavijo in Ukrajino.
Of the six newly independent states (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine) the most targeted countries by the new Member States are Moldova and Ukraine.
Vendar je izvajanje razvojne pomoči težje pri najmanj razvitih državah.
However, development aid implementation is more difficult concerning least developed countries.
Glavna instrumenta EU za izboljšanje odnosa z vzhodnimi sosedami sta sosedska politika in in evropski instrument sosedstva in partnerstva.
The main EU's instrument to improve its relationship with its Eastern neighbours is the Neighbourhood Policy and the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENPI).
Ti odnosi temeljijo na akcijskih načrtih za države, ki se jih razvije in se o njih pogaja z vsako posamezno državo.
These relationships are based on Country Action Plans, developed and negotiated with each individual country.
Vendar šest držav (Kazahstan, Kirgizistan, Ruska federacija, Tadžikistan, Turkmenistan in Uzbekistan) ne sodeluje pri sosedski politiki, temveč so podpisale sporazume o partnerstvu in sodelovanju.
However six countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) do not participate in the Neighbourhood policy but have Partnership and Cooperation Agreements.
EU in pet držav osrednje Azije (Kazahstan, Uzbekistan, Kirgizistan, Tadžikistan, Turkmenistan) si želijo še naprej razvijati odnose ter priznavajo, da se je treba spopasti še z nekaterimi izzivi (meje, ravnanje z vodami, organizirani kriminal, izobraževanje, pravna država, človekove pravice).
Both the EU and the five countries of Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kirgizia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan) wish to further develop their relations and recognise that there are challenges to be met (borders, water management, organised crime, education, rule of law, human rights).
Ruska federacija ne uporablja evropske sosedske politike, ker želi v odnosih z EU ohraniti „enakovreden položaj“, saj v evropski sosedski politiki vidi podrejenost.
The Russian Federation does not take the opportunity of the European Neighbourhood policy because it wants to preserve an "equal footing" in its relationship with the EU as opposed to the "junior partnership" that Russia sees in the ENP.
Poleg tega so pogajanja o akcijskih načrtih evropske sosedske politike za Armenijo, Azerbajdžan, Gruzijo, Moldavijo in Ukrajino potekala brez sodelovanja novih držav članic, saj so se končala, še preden so te države med letoma 2004 in 2007 vstopile v Unijo v letih, torej brez upoštevanja njihovega pomembnega prispevka.
Furthermore, the ENP Action Plans with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine were negotiated without the involvement of the new Member States as they were concluded before they entered the Union in 2004/07 and therefore do not take into account important new Member States' insight.
Priporočila zajemajo več točk:
The following recommendations are concerned with several points:
– potrebno izboljšanje politik razvojnega sodelovanja v novih državah članicah,
-The need to improve development cooperation policies in the new Member States,
– priznanje, da so povezave novih držav članic z novimi sosedami EU pomembne.
-The acknowledgement that the new Member States are important links to the EU's new neighbours.
Glavne težave pri izvajanju učinkovitih razvojnih politik v novih državah članicah izhajajo iz težkega prehoda s statusa prejemnic pomoči na donatorice pomoči.
The main difficulties of implementing efficient development policies in the new Member States result from the difficult transition from aid receiver to aid donor.
Manjka centraliziranih agencij za načrtovanje strategij in ozaveščenosti javnosti, treba pa je tudi okrepiti nevladne razvojne organizacije z novimi nalogami.
There is a lack of centralised agencies for strategy planning, lack of public awareness and the need to strengthen developmental NGOs with their new tasks.
Nevladne razvojne organizacije novih držav članic so v poročilu konfederacije Concord, ki je bilo objavljeno leta 2007, že izrazile zaskrbljenost glede svojega občutljivega finančnega stanja.
NGDOs of the new Member States already expressed concern over their vulnerable financial situation in a CONCORD report published in 2007.
Odločna zavezanost novih držav članic, da do leta 2010 dosežejo 0,10–0,17 % bruto nacionalnega dohodka za uradno razvojno pomoč, je bila zaradi različnih razlogov, kot so nizka stopnja javne podpore za razvojno sodelovanje in postsovjetska vprašanja, omajana.
The new Member States' are struggling to meet their commitments to achieve 0.10-0.17% ODA/GNI by 2010 due to a number of reasons such as low levels of current public support for development cooperation and post-Soviet-related issues.
Zato je osrednjega pomena, da se okrepi civilna družba in začne obsežna kampanja za posvetovanje z javnostjo in za njeno ozaveščanje, da bi od nje dobili povratne informacije o vlogi in odgovornosti v evropskih državah in svetu.
Therefore, it is crucial to reinforce civil society and to engage in greater public consultation and development awareness campaign in order to gain feedback on the role and responsibility in their countries in Europe and in the world.
Države OECD, ki namenijo več sredstev za razvojno izobraževanje/ ozaveščanje, imajo na splošno višje razmerje med bruto nacionalnim dohodkom in uradno razvojno pomočjo ter kažejo nekoliko večjo stopnjo ozaveščenosti glede razvojnih vprašanj.
The OECD countries that spend more on development education/awareness raising have in general higher ODA/GNI ratios and show slightly better public awareness on development issues.
Ta raziskava centra za razvoj OECD dokazuje, da izobraževanje, kampanje za ozaveščanje, javne razprave in mediji vplivajo na krepitev ozaveščenosti.
This OECD Development Centre research proves that education, awareness-raising campaigns, pubic debate and media focus have an effect on increasing awareness.
Z boljšim izobraževanjem in informiranjem v državah v razvoju se lahko pričakujejo odločnejše, učinkovitejše ter bolj usklajene politike razvojnega sodelovanja.
More vigorous, efficient and coherent development co-operation policies can be expected through better education and information in developing countries.
Priporočila: zagotoviti je treba je učinkovito usklajevanje med dejavnostmi starih in novih donatoric ter oceniti in uporabiti morebitne prednosti novih držav članic v posameznih sektorjih oziroma državah.
Recommendations: There is a pressing need to coordinate old and new donor activities, while the potential advantages of the new Member States should be assessed and used in particular sectors/countries.
Javne medije in razvojne nevladne organizacije je treba spodbuditi, da povečajo ozaveščenost ljudi, saj bo le s širšo podporo mogoče evropskemu razvojnemu sodelovanju omogočiti finančna sredstva in človeške vire.
The media and development NGOs should be encouraged to raise awareness among the population at large because only with wider support will it be possible to allocate financial and human resources to European development cooperation.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih pravilih za dostop do trga avtobusnih prevozov (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the market for coach and bus services (recast)
(Prenovitev – člen 80 a uredbe)
(Recast – Rule 80a of the Rules of Procedure)
PRILOGA 1: PISMO Odbora za pravne zadeve ........................................................18
ANNEX 1: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS......................................18
PRILOGA 2: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB............................20
ANNEX 2: OPINION IN LETTER FORM OF THE LEGAL SERVICES' CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY 20
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0264 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0264 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 71 pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0147/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 71 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0147/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structural use of the recasting technique for legal acts
– ob upoštevanju pisma odbora za pravne zadeve z dne 20. novembra 2007 v skladu s členom 80a, odstavek 3, svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to the letter of 20 November 2007 from the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to rule 80a(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju členov 80 a in 51 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 80a and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
2. poziva Komisijo, naj zadevo ponovno predloži Parlamentu, če namerava ta predlog bistveno spremeniti ali nadomestiti z drugim besedilom;
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
Besedilo, ki ga vlaga Komisija
Text proposed by the Commission
(6 a) Ta uredba ne velja za prevoznike, ki imajo dostop le do notranjega trga avtobusnih prevozov, niti za licence, ki jih prevoznikom izdajajo države članice sedeža.
(6a) This Regulation should not apply either to carriers who have access only to their national market for coach and bus services or to the licences issued to those carriers by Member States of establishment.
(13) Upravne postopke bi bilo treba čim bolj skrajšati, brez opustitve kontrole in sankcij , ki zagotavljajo pravilno uporabo in učinkovito izvrševanje te uredbe.
(13) Administrative formalities should be reduced as far as possible without abandoning the controls and sanctions that guarantee the correct application and effective enforcement of this Regulation.
V ta namen bi bilo treba pojasniti in okrepiti obstoječa pravila o odvzemu licence Skupnosti.
To this end the existing rules on the withdrawal of the Community licence should be clarified and strengthened.
Veljavna pravila bi bilo treba prilagoditi, da bodo omogočala učinkovito sankcioniranje resnih kršitev ali ponavljajočih se manjših kršitev , storjenih v državi članici, ki ni država članica sedeža.
The current rules should be adapted to allow the effective sanctioning of serious or repeated minor infringements committed in a Member State other than the Member State of establishment.
Sankcije naj bodo nediskriminatorne in sorazmerne z resnostjo kršitev.
Sanctions should be non-discriminatory and in proportion to the seriousness of the infringements.
Obstajati bi morala možnost vložitve pravnega sredstva zoper vsako naloženo sankcijo.
It should be possible to lodge an appeal in respect of any sanctions imposed.
Veljavna pravila bi bilo treba prilagoditi, da bodo omogočala učinkovito sankcioniranje resnih kršitev, storjenih v kateri koli državi članici, ki ni država članica sedeža.
The current rules should be adapted to allow the effective sanctioning of serious infringements committed in Member States other than the Member State of establishment.
Manjše kršitve se lahko začnejo obravnavati kot „ponavljajoče se kršitve“, če so storjene v več državah članicah.
Minor infringements can be considered to be of a ‘repeated’ nature if they have been committed in more than one Member State.
Vse dokler se bodo kršitve v državah članicah razlagale in obravnavale na tako različne načine in glede na to, da trenutno ni nobenih konkretnih obetov o hitrih izboljšavah na tem področju, uredba ne bi smela vsebovati določb, ki se nanašajo na ponavljajoče se manjše kršitve.
So long as infringements are interpreted and dealt with in such different ways in Member States and there is for the time being no specific prospect of any speedy improvement in this respect, this regulation should not include provisions relating to repeated minor infringements.
(14) Države članice bi morale v svoj nacionalni register podjetij cestnega prevoza vnesti vse resne kršitve in ponavljajoče se manjše kršitve, ki so jih storili cestni prevozniki in za katere so bile naložene sankcije.
(14) Member States should enter in their national register of road transport undertakings all serious infringements and repeated minor infringements committed by carriers and which have led to the imposition of a sanction.
(14) Države članice bi morale v svoj nacionalni register podjetij cestnega prevoza vnesti vse resne kršitve, ki so jih storili prevozniki in za katere so bile naložene sankcije.
(14) Member States should enter in their national register of road transport undertakings all serious infringements committed by carriers and which have led to the imposition of a sanction
(g) „resne kršitve ali ponavljajoče se manjše kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti o cestnem prometu“ pomenijo kršitve , ki vodijo do izgube dobrega ugleda v skladu s členom 6(1) in (2) Uredbe (ES) št. […] [o določitvi skupnih pravil glede pogojev, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni za opravljanje dejavnosti cestnega prevoznika].
(g) ‘serious infringement or repeated minor infringements of Community road transport legislation’ means infringements which lead to the loss of good repute in accordance with Article 6(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No […] [establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator].
(g) „resne kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti o cestnem prometu“ pomenijo kršitve, ki potem, ko je bil v zvezi z njimi sprožen postopek na sodišču , lahko vodijo do izgube dobrega ugleda v skladu s členom 6(1) in (2) Uredbe (ES) št. […] [o določitvi skupnih pravil glede pogojev, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni za opravljanje dejavnosti cestnega prevoznika].
(g) ‘serious infringement of Community road transport legislation’ means infringements which , after they have been brought before a court, could lead to the loss of good repute in accordance with Article 6(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No […] [establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator].
Člen 6, odstavek 6, pododstavek 1
Article 6, paragraph 6, subparagraph 1
Izvajalec linijskega prevoza lahko uporablja dodatna vozila, da je kos začasnim in izrednim okoliščinam.
The operator of a regular service may use additional vehicles to deal with temporary and exceptional situations.
O razlogih za te začasne in izredne okoliščine obvesti državo članico, na ozemlju katere je odhodni kraj.
It shall inform the Member State in whose territory the place of departure is situated of the reasons for any such temporary and exceptional situation.
Člen 6, odstavek 6 a (novo)
Article 6, paragraph 6 a (new)
Države članice lahko iz postopka odobritve izvzamejo redne čezmejne linijske prevoze, ki ne presegajo razdalje 50 km od meje.
Member States may refrain from applying the authorising procedure to cross-border regular services not extending more than 50 km beyond the border.
O tem obvestijo Komisijo in sosednje države.
They shall inform the Commission and neighbouring countries thereof.
Organ, ki izdaja dovoljenja, odloči o vlogi v štirih mesecih od dneva, ko prevoznik vlogo predloži.
The authorising authority shall take a decision on the application within four months of the date of submission of the application by the carrier.
Organ, ki izdaja dovoljenja, odloči o vlogi v treh mesecih od dneva, ko prevoznik vlogo predloži.
The authorising authority shall take a decision on the application within three months of the date of submission of the application by the carrier.
Člen 8, odstavek 4, pododstavek 1, točka (b)
Article 8, paragraph 4, subparagraph 1, point (b)