natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija lahko v času postopka na Sodišču navede nove primere kršitev obveznosti iz zakonodaje EU.
Firstly, the Commission can adduce new examples of infringements of a given EU law obligation during the Court procedures.
Poleg tega pa morajo države članice, ki kršijo obveznosti, odpraviti posledice teh kršitev, predvsem pa temeljito spremeniti svoje upravne prakse.
Secondly, the Member State found in breach needs not merely to remedy the instances of violation, but more fundamentally to change its administrative practice.
Poročevalka verjame, da bi pojem splošne in strukturne kršitve lahko zagotovil podlago za učinkovitejše izvrševanje obveznosti zakonodaje enotnega trga na področjih, kot je javno naročanje.
Your Rapporteur believes that the notion of ‘general and structural infringement’ could pave the way for a more effective enforcement of the Single Market law obligations in areas such as public procurement.
Poročevalka predlaga, da je treba storiti več, da bi zagotovili pravočasen prenos, pa tudi za okrepitev prizadevanj za zagotovitev pravilnega prenosa.
Your Rapporteur suggests that more work needs to be done not only to ensure timely transposition, but also to step up efforts to ensure correct transposition.
Predlaga, naj si države članice prizadevajo za znižanje povprečne stopnje nedoseganja prenosa na 0,5 % do leta 2012, vključno z izrednim in nepravilnim prenosom direktiv o enotnem trgu.
She suggests that the Member States should aim at reducing the average transposition deficit to 0,5 per cent by 2012, including both outstanding and incorrect transposition of Single Market Directives.
Poročevalka meni, da so uradni postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev ponavadi dolgotrajni (povprečno obdobje za razrešitev takšnega postopka traja od 28 mesecev v EU-15 do 16 mesecev v EU-12).
Your Rapporteur observes that the formal infringement proceedings usually take a long time (the average duration to resolve such proceedings ranging from 28 months for EU 15 to 16 months for EU 12).
Komisijo poziva, naj določi merilo 12 mesecev za najdaljše povprečno obdobje za postopek ugotavljanja kršitev.
She urges the Commission to set a benchmark of 12 months for the maximum average time taken to process infringements.
Poročevalka ugotavlja, da nacionalni organi v povprečju potrebujejo 17,7 mesecev za izpolnitev pogojev iz sodb Sodišča, ki ugotavljajo, da nekatere države članice niso izpolnile svojih obveznosti.
Your Rapporteur notes that national authorities take an average of 17.7 months to comply with the Court judgements, which have found that certain Member States had not complied with their obligations.
Komisijo poziva, naj določi obdobje, v katerem morajo države članice izpolniti pogoje iz sodbe Sodišča.
She asks the Commission to propose a benchmark for Member States’ to comply with the rulings of the Court of Justice.
Spremljanje, ocena in posodabljanje
Monitoring, evaluation and modernization
Poročevalka meni, da dobro upravljanje enotnega trga lahko temelji le na kakovostnih informacijah o delovanju enotnega trga.
Your Rapporteur believes that good governance of the Single Market can only be based on good quality information about the functioning of the Single Market.
Za povezavo različnih stopenj političnega cikla, od zasnove do izvajanja, je treba uporabiti ustrezne instrumente za spremljanje in oceno politik enotnega trga.
Appropriate instruments for monitoring and evaluation of Single Market policies should be used to link the different stages of the policy cycle from design to implementation.
Poročevalka meni, da bi morale biti države članice bolj dejavne pri ocenjevanju in spremljanju pravil enotnega trga.
Your Rapporteur believes that Member States should become more engaged with evaluation and monitoring of Single Market rules.
Države članice spodbuja predvsem, naj redno izvajajo preglede zakonodaje enotnega trga, tako da pregledujejo nacionalna pravila in postopke, ki vplivajo na prost pretok storitev in blaga, da bi poenostavile in posodobile nacionalna pravila ter odpravile prekrivanja.
She encourages Member States in particular to undertake regularly Single Market legislation evaluation exercises, reviewing national rules and procedures which have an impact on free movement of services and goods in order to simplify and modernize national rules and remove overlaps.
1. ugotavlja, da notranji trg potrebuje podporo vseh, saj je osrednji del evropskega projekta in temelj za izgradnjo trajnostnega bogastva v EU;
Notes that the internal market requires the support of all as a cornerstone of the European project and the foundation of sustainable wealth creation in the EU;
4. priporoča Komisiji, naj v okviru predloga št. 48 izvede neodvisno analizo in opredeli 20 največjih virov nezadovoljstva in razočaranja v zvezi z enotnim trgom, s katerimi se soočajo državljani v vsakdanjem življenju, zlasti v povezavi z e-trgovino, čezmejno zdravstveno oskrbo in vzajemnim priznanjem poklicnih kvalifikacij;
Recommends that the Commission conduct an independent exercise in the framework of proposal No 48 to identify the top 20 single-market-related sources of dissatisfaction and frustration which citizens encounter every day, in particular in relation to e-commerce, cross-border medical care and mutual recognition of professional qualifications;
7. poudarja, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti ustrezni krepitvi zdravstva in varnosti ter druge zakonodaje s socialnega področja, kot je delovni čas;
Highlights that special attention should be devoted to the proper enforcement of health and safety and other legislation in the social remit, such as working time;
11. pozdravlja predlog Komisije o razvoju strategije za omogočanje širše uporabe informacijskega sistema notranjega trga in o njegovi združitvi z drugimi omrežji, da bi zagotovili učinkovitejšo upravno sodelovanje in boljše izvajanje zakonodaje o notranjem trgu;
Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to develop a strategy to enable the wider application of the internal market information system (IMI) and to integrate it with other networks for more efficient administrative cooperation and better implementation of internal market legislation;
14. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj tesno sodelujejo s socialnimi partnerji, zlasti pri izvajanju in uveljavljanju zakonodaje, ki podpira projekt notranjega trga; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga konkretne ukrepe za njihovo dejavno in učinkovito udeležbo ter naj jih podpira in spodbuja pri izmenjavi znanja, izkušenj in primerov dobre prakse na teh področjih.
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work closely with the social partners, particularly in implementing and enforcing the legislation underpinning the single market project; asks the Commission to propose concrete measures for their active and efficient involvement, and to support and encourage them to share knowledge, experience and best practices in these areas;
16. meni, da mora Komisija temeljne pravice vključiti v vso zakonodajo o enotnem trgu; meni, da bi s tem zagotovili, da uresničevanje temeljnih gospodarskih svoboščin enotnega trga ne bi omejevalo pravic do kolektivnih pogajanj in pravice do stavke, opredeljenih v nacionalni zakonodaji;
Considers that the Commission has to anchor fundamental rights in all legislation on the single market; considers that this would ensure that implementation of the economic fundamental freedoms of the single market does not impede collective bargaining rights and the right to strike as defined by national legislation;
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Karima Delli, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Patrick Le Hyaric, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Karima Delli, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Patrick Le Hyaric, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Konstantinos Poupakis, Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
4. pozdravlja namero Komisije, da bo pripravila javno posvetovanje o evropskemu pristopu do skupnih pritožb, in je proti uvedbi mehanizmov alternativnega načina reševanja sporov po vzoru ZDA, kjer zaradi močnih gospodarskih spodbud do sodišč pridejo neupravičeni zahtevki;
Welcomes the Commission’s intention to launch a public consultation on a European approach to collective redress, and opposes the introduction of collective redress mechanisms along the lines of the US model, which contains strong economic incentives to bring unmeritorious claims to court;
7. poziva države članice, naj vendarle sprejmejo korelacijske tabele v zvezi z izvajanjem zakonodaje, da bodo zakonodajne pomanjkljivosti očitnejše;
Calls on the Member States finally to accept correlation tables concerning the implementation of legislation in order to make legislation deficits more transparent;
13. meni, da je treba pri dobrem upravljanju enotnega trga spoštovati vlogo dveh obstoječih svetovalnih institucij na evropski ravni: Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij, pa tudi vlogo socialnih partnerjev.
Believes that the ‘good governance’ of the single market must respect the role of the two advisory institutions existing at European level – the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions –, as well as that of the social partners.
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Kurt Lechner, Hans-Peter Mayer, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Catherine Stihler, Eva-Britt Svensson, Róża Thun Und Hohenstein (Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein), Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Kurt Lechner, Hans-Peter Mayer, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Catherine Stihler, Eva-Britt Svensson, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud
Pascal Canfin, Ashley Fox, María Irigoyen Pérez, Morten Løkkegaard, Emma McClarkin, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Olga Sehnalová
Pascal Canfin, Ashley Fox, María Irigoyen Pérez, Morten Løkkegaard, Emma McClarkin, Konstantinos Poupakis, Olga Sehnalová
o uporabi globalnih satelitskih navigacijskih sistemov v prometu: kratko- in srednjeročna politika EU
on transport applications of Global Navigation Satellite Systems – short- and medium-term EU policy
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................11
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy .......11
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................14
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE....................................................................13
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o akcijskem načrtu za aplikacije sistema za globalno satelitsko navigacijo (GNSS) ( KOM(2010)0308 ),
– having regard to the communication of 14 June 2010 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an Action Plan on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Applications ( COM(2010)0308 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 1. oktobra 2010 o tem akcijskem načrtu (14146/10),
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 1 October 2010 on that action plan (14146/10),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. oktobra 2010 Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom „O vodilni pobudi iz strategije Evropa 2020 Unija inovacij“ (KOM(2010)546),
– having regard to the communication of 16 October 2010 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative: Innovation Union’ (COM(2010)546),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Evropske komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 18. januarja 2011 o vmesnem pregledu evropskih programov satelitske navigacije (KOM(2011)5), kjer je izražena potreba po vlaganju velikih finančnih sredstev za dokončanje infrastrukture za satelitsko navigacijo,
– having regard to the Commission report of 18 January 2011 to the European Parliament and the Council, constituting the mid-term review of the European satellite radio navigation programmes ( COM(2011)0005 ), which maintains that significant funding is needed in order to complete the satellite radio navigation infrastructure,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o nadaljevanju izvajanja evropskih satelitskih navigacijskih programov (EGNOS in Galileo)
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo)
UL L 196, 24.7.2008, str.
OJ L 196, 24.7.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1321/2004 z dne 12. julija 2004 o vzpostavitvi upravljavskih struktur za upravljanje Evropskega satelitskega radio-navigacijskega sistema
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 of 12 July 2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes
– ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije z dne 8. decembra 2006 o aplikacijah sistemov za satelitsko navigacijo ( KOM(2006)0769 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Green Paper of 8 December 2006 on Satellite Navigation Applications ( COM(2006)0769 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 912/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2010 o ustanovitvi Agencije za evropski GNSS, razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1321/2004 o vzpostavitvi upravljavskih struktur Evropskega satelitskega radio-navigacijskega sistema in spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
– having regard to Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 setting up the European GNSS Agency, repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio navigation programmes and amending Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council
UL L 276, 20.10.2010, str.11. ,
OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p.11. ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. januarja 2004 o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o stopnji napredka programa Galileo
– having regard to its resolution of 29 January 2004 on the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the state of progress of the Galileo programme
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ter mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0084/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0084/2011 )
A. ker so zdaj aplikacije GNSS glavne in nepogrešljive v vseh vrstah prometa in ker je promet zaradi njihovega učinkovitega in uspešnega delovanja varnejši, okolju prijaznejši in cenejši;
A. whereas GNSS applications are now a central and indispensable feature of activity in every transport sector and whereas their efficient and effective operation makes transport safer, more environmentally friendly and economical,
B. ker prometne aplikacije zajemajo 20 % vseh aplikacij GNSS glede na obseg in 44 % glede na vrednost ter ker varnostne operacije, ki so večinoma povezane s prometom, pokrivajo dodatnih 5 %,
B. whereas transport applications account for 20% of all GNSS applications by volume and 44% by value, and whereas safety operations – mostly related to transport – account for a further 5%,
C. ker osnovna infrastruktura Evropske unije, ki jo sistem GNSS potrebuje za svoje delovanje, ne more v nedogled ostati odvisna od sistemov, ki so bili prvotno razviti za potrebe drugih držav,
C. whereas the European Union cannot indefinitely remain dependent for the basic infrastructure required for the operation of GNSS on systems developed initially for other purposes by other countries,
D. ker je EGNOS samostojni sistem, ki dopolnjuje GPS in ki je za opravljanje funkcije ocene in korekcije odvisen od signalov GPS-signalov; ker bo GNSS postal popolnoma neodvisen šele z uvedbo sistema Galileo,
D. whereas EGNOS is a self-contained system to supplement GPS which is dependent on the availability of GPS signals in order to perform calculation and correction operations; whereas there will be no completely independent GNSS until Galileo has been deployed,
E. ker je bil evropski sistem EGNOS oblikovan, da bi zadostil precejšnjemu in raznolikemu povpraševanju evropske in svetovne industrije sedaj in v prihodnje, na primer glede prevoza, varnosti in sledljivosti, ter uresničil cilje nove in bolj proaktivne evropske industrijske politike, ter ker je tudi skladen s sistemom GPS in ga dopolnjuje ter je občutno natančnejši od sistema Galileo,
E. whereas Europe’s EGNOS system is designed to meet substantial and varied present and future demand from industry in Europe and worldwide, for instance as regards transport safety and traceability, in keeping with the aims of Europe’s new, more proactive industrial policy, and whereas it is also compatible with and supplements GPS and the significantly more accurate Galileo system,
F. ker tržne aplikacije GNSS in Galileo predstavljajo naraščajoč svetovni trg in ker jih je treba kar se da dobro zavarovati za zagotovitev gospodarske koristi evropske industrije ter za ustvarjanje delovnih mest,
F. whereas the commercial transport applications of GNSS and Galileo represent a growing global market which should be secured as far as is possible for the economic benefit of European industry and for the creation of skilled jobs,
G. ker bo imel GNSS bistveno vlogo pri podpori in spodbujanju uporabe inteligentnih prometnih sistemov (Intelligent Transport Systems – ITS),
G. whereas GNSS will play a vital role in supporting and promoting the use of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITSs),
H. ker je razvoj aplikacij in storitev GNSS bistven, da se zagotovi popolno izkoriščanje naložb v infrastrukturo sistema Galileo ter razvoj vseh njegovih zmogljivosti,
H. whereas the development of GNSS applications and services is essential in order to ensure that the infrastructure investment which Galileo represents is fully exploited and that the Galileo system is developed to its full capacity,
I. ker naložbe v tem sektorju vplivajo na vse politike EU in ker bosta širitev ter uvedba sistema Galileo neposredno vplivala na uresničevanje strategije EU 2020, z vidika razvijanja potenciala evropskega trga aplikacij GNSS in storitev pa se bodo ustvarjala delovna mesta in krepila evropska konkurenčnost;
I. whereas investment in this sector has implications for all EU policies, and whereas its expansion and implementation will have a direct impact on the realisation of the EU 2020 Strategy and from the point of view of developing the potential of the European market in GNSS applications and services so as to create jobs and enhance Europe’s competitiveness,
J. ker projekta GNSS in Galileo prinašata precejšnjo dodano vrednost evropski industrijski politiki in ker je nujno zagotoviti njun uspeh;
J. whereas the GNSS and Galileo projects bring considerable added value to European industrial policy and whereas it is essential to ensure their success,
3. ugotavlja, da se od 15 sektorsko opredeljenih predlogov v akcijskem načrtu, 9 nanaša na promet in večina drugih je potrebnih za podporo prometnih aplikacij;
Notes that, of the 15 section-specific proposals in the action plan, nine relate directly to transport and most of the others are required in order to underpin the relevant transport applications;
6. obžaluje, da cela Evropska unija ni pokrita s sistemom EGNOS, in poziva, naj se njegovo kritje prednostno razširi na južno, vzhodno in jugovzhodno Evropo, da se v celotni Evropi zagotovi uporaba sistema v vseh prometnih sektorjih ter poudarja, da je pomembno zagotoviti, da se njegovo kritje razširi na države v južnem in vzhodnem Sredozemlju (države MEDA) ter na Bližnji vzhod in v Afriko;
Regrets that all of the European Union is not at this time covered by EGNOS and calls for EGNOS system coverage to be extended to southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe as a matter of priority, so as to enable the system to be used throughout Europe in every transport sector, and stresses the importance of ensuring that its coverage extends to both the MEDA countries and the Middle East and Africa;
7. poudarja pomen GNSS pri razvoju inteligentnih prometnih sistemov; opozarja, da lahko inteligentni prometni sistemi omogočijo učinkovitejše, čistejše in varnejše prometne rešitve, za pravilno izvajanje številnih storitev inteligentnih prometnih sistemov pa je nujen popolno delujoč GNSS;
7.Underlines the importance of GNSS in developing ITSs; points out that ITSs can provide more efficient, cleaner and safer transport solutions, and that proper implementation of a number of ITS services requires fully operational GNSS systems;
9. zato poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi ustrezne upravne predloge, da se sistemu GNSS omogoči dodana vrednost za varnost vseh oblik prometa, zlasti cestnega, ter da se izboljša učinkovitost prevoza blaga;
Calls therefore on the Commission to bring forward the necessary regulatory proposals to deliver GNSS added value for safety in all forms of transport, particularly on the roads, and to help improve freight transport efficiency;
14. poziva Komisijo, naj učinkovito izvaja prepričljive ukrepe kampanjo osveščanja iz akcijskega načrta, da bi v Evropi omogočili obširno uporabo sistema EGNOS na vseh področjih uporabe in s tem zagotovili bolj zapletene pristope;
Calls on the Commission to efficiently implement the strong awareness-raising measures set out in the Action Plan, in order to secure the extensive use of EGNOS in Europe, in all application areas, and thus ensure more complex approaches;
19. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo 100 milijonov EUR iz odobritev za plačila za raziskave v sedmem okvirnem programu, ki se verjetno ne bodo porabili, na razpolago za razvoj aplikacij sistema GNSS;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the EUR 100 m likely to be underspent in payment appropriations for research within the Seventh Framework Programme is made available for the development of GNSS applications;