natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Država članica, ki izvaja postopek določanja države članice, odgovorne v smislu te uredbe, prosilcem ponudi možnost osebnega razgovora z osebo, ki je na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje za to usposobljena.
The Member State carrying out the process of determining the Member State responsible under this Regulation, shall give applicants the opportunity of a personal interview with a qualified person under national law to conduct such an interview.
Država članica, ki izvaja postopek določanja države članice, odgovorne v smislu te uredbe, prosilce pozove na osebni razgovor z osebo, ki je na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje za to usposobljena.
The Member State carrying out the process of determining the Member State responsible under this Regulation, shall call the applicants for a personal interview with a qualified person under national law to conduct such an interview.
Treba je pojasniti, da je ta razgovor obvezen.
It is important to make clearer the mandatory character of the interview.
Namen osebnega razgovora je olajšanje postopka določitve odgovorne države članice, zlasti da se prosilcu omogoči predložitev ustreznih podatkov, ki so potrebni za pravilno ugotovitev odgovorne države članice, in se prosilca ustno obvesti o uporabi te uredbe.
The personal interview shall be for the purpose of facilitating the process of determining the Member State responsible, in particular for allowing the applicant to submit relevant information necessary for the correct identification of the responsible Member State, and for the purpose of informing the applicant orally about the application of this Regulation.
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
Clearer wording of the text.
Države članice poskrbijo, da predstavnik zastopa in/ali pomaga mladoletniku brez spremstva v vseh postopkih iz te uredbe.
Member States shall ensure that a representative represents and/or assists the unaccompanied minor with respect to all procedures provided for in this Regulation.
Ta predstavnik je lahko tudi predstavnik iz člena 23 Direktive […/…/ES] [o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil].
This representative may also be the representative referred to in Article 23 of Directive […/…/EC] [laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers].
Države članice poskrbijo, da predstavnik zastopa in/ali pomaga mladoletniku brez spremstva v vseh postopkih iz te uredbe skladno s točko i) člena 2 direktive št. 2005/85/ES .
Member States shall ensure that a representative within the meaning of Article 2(i) of Directive 2005/85/EC represents and/or assists the unaccompanied minor with respect to all procedures provided for in this Regulation.
Predlog spremembe omogoča, da se termin "predstavnik" pojasni s sklicevanjem na opredelitev iz člena 2(i) direktive št. 2005/85/ES o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah.
This amendment specifies what is meant by ‘representative’ by referring to the definition contained in Article 2(i) of Directive 2005/85/EC on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status.
Države članice v nacionalni zakonodaji vzpostavijo postopke za izsleditev družinskih članov ali drugih sorodnikov, ki so prisotni v državah članicah mladoletnikov brez spremstva.
Member States shall establish procedures in national legislation for tracing the family members or other relatives present in the Member States of unaccompanied minors.
Po vložitvi prošnje za mednarodno zaščito čim je mogoče začnejo iskati člane družine mladoletnika brez spremstva ali njegove druge sorodnike, pri čemer poskrbijo za varstvo njegove največje koristi.
They shall start to trace the members of the unaccompanied minor’s family or other relatives as soon as possible, after the lodging of the application for international protection whilst protecting his/her best interests.
Države članice vzpostavijo postopke za izsleditev družinskih članov ali drugih sorodnikov, ki so prisotni v državah članicah mladoletnikov brez spremstva , po potrebi s pomočjo mednarodnih ali drugih ustreznih organizacij .
Member States shall establish procedures for tracing the family members or other relatives present in the Member States of unaccompanied minors , where necessary with the assistance of international or other relevant organisations.
Države članice lahko v okviru izvajanja te uredbe in pod pogoji iz člena 17 direktive 2005/85/ES uporabijo zdravstvene preglede za ugotavljanje starosti mladoletnikov brez spremstva.
Within the framework of the application of this Regulation and under the conditions laid down in Article 17 of Directive 2005/85/EC, Member States may use medical examinations to determine the age of unaccompanied minors.
Če se uporabijo zdravstveni pregledi, države članice zagotovijo razumno in temeljito izvedbo teh pregledov v skladu z znanstvenimi in etičnimi standardi.
In cases where medical examinations are used, Member States shall ensure that they are conducted in a reasonable and thorough manner, as required by scientific and ethical standards.
Razprava o prednostih in slabostih zdravniških pregledov še vedno traja, zadevo pa bi bilo treba obravnavati pri bližajočem se pregledu direktive 2005/85/ES.
Debate on 'ins & outs' of medical examinations is ongoing and should be addressed under the upcoming revision of Directive 2005/85/EC.
Če države članice uporabijo takšne preglede, bi morale v vsakem primeru zagotoviti, da so pregledi izvedeni v skladu z znanstvenimi in etičnimi standardi.
If Member States use such examinations they should in any case ensure that these examinations are conducted in line with scientific and ethical standards.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 2 se za zagotovitev spoštovanja načela enotnosti družine in največje koristi otroka država članica, odgovorna v skladu z merili iz členov 8 do 12, določi na podlagi položaja, ki je obstajal, ko je prosilec za azil vložil zadnjo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito.
By way of derogation from paragraph 2, in order to ensure respect for the principle of family unity and of the bests interests of the child, the Member State responsible in accordance with the criteria laid down in Articles 8 to 12 shall be determined on the basis of the situation obtaining when the asylum seeker lodged his/her most recent application for international protection.
Ta odstavek se uporablja, če o predhodnih prošnjah prosilca za azil še ni bila sprejeta prva vsebinska odločitev.
This paragraph shall apply on condition that the previous applications of the asylum seeker have not yet been subject of a first decision regarding the substance.
Zaradi tega bi prišlo do oteženega določanja odgovornosti in spodbujanja zlorab.
This would make the determination of responsibility too complicated and encourage abuse.
Če je prosilec mladoletnik brez spremstva, katerega sorodnik , ki lahko poskrbi zanj, je zakonito prisoten v drugi državi članici, je ta država članica odgovorna za obravnavanje prošnje , če je to v največjo korist mladoletnika.
Where the applicant is an unaccompanied minor who has a relative legally present in another Member State who can take care of him or her, that Member State shall be responsible for examining the application, provided that this is in the best interests of the minor.
Če je prosilec mladoletnik brez spremstva, ki v drugi državi članici nima nobenega zakonito prisotnega družinskega člana v smislu člena 2i) , vendar je v drugi državi članici zakonito prisotna druga oseba, ki je z njim v sorodu in lahko poskrbi zanj, je ta država članica odgovorna za obravnavanje prošnje , če je to v največjo korist mladoletnika.
Where the applicant is an unaccompanied minor who has no family members within the meaning of Article 2(i) legally present in another Member State but who has another relative legally present in another Member State who can take care of him or her, that Member State shall be responsible for examining the application, provided that this is in the best interests of the minor.
Treba je pojasniti pomen tega odstavka glede na prejšnji odstavek.
It is necessary to clarify the meaning of this paragraph compared to the previous paragraph.
V odsotnosti družinskega člana ali drugega sorodnika je za obravnavanje prošnje odgovorna država članica, v kateri je mladoletnik vložil zadnjo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito , če je to v največjo korist mladoletnika .
In the absence of a family member or of another relative, the Member State responsible for examining the application shall be that where the minor has lodged his or her most recent application for international protection , provided that this is in the best interests of the minor .
V odsotnosti družinskega člana ali drugega sorodnika je za obravnavanje prošnje odgovorna država članica, v kateri je mladoletnik vložil prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito.
In the absence of a family member or of another relative, the Member State responsible for examining the application shall be that where the minor has lodged his or her application for international protection.
Člen 23 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
V primeru poznejše prošnje za mednarodno zaščito se zahteva za ponovni sprejem zadevne osebe vloži čim hitreje oziroma v vsakem primeru v dveh mesecih od prejema zadetka EURODAC, kot je opredeljeno v členu 6(5) Uredbe (ES) št. [.../...] [o vzpostavitvi sistema „EURODAC“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe dublinske uredbe].
In case of a subsequent application for international protection, the request to take back the person concerned shall be made as quickly as possible and in any case within two months of receiving the EURODAC hit, pursuant to Article 6(5) of Regulation (EC) No [.../...] [concerning the establishment of “EURODAC” for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Regulation].
V primeru poznejše prošnje za mednarodno zaščito se zahteva za ponovni sprejem zadevne osebe vloži čim hitreje oziroma v vsakem primeru v enem mesecu od prejema zadetka EURODAC, kot je opredeljeno v členu 6(5) Uredbe (ES) št. [.../...] [o vzpostavitvi sistema „EURODAC“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe dublinske uredbe].
In case of a subsequent application for international protection, the request to take back the person concerned shall be made as quickly as possible and in any case within one month of receiving the EURODAC hit, pursuant to Article 6(5) of Regulation (EC) No [.../...] [concerning the establishment of “EURODAC” for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Regulation].
Po zadetku v sistemu EURODAC več ni razlogov za dolgo zamudo pri zahtevi za ponovni sprejem zadevne osebe.
Once there is a hit in the EURODAC system there is no need for a long delay in filling the request to take back the person concerned.
Člen 23 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 1
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Če poznejše prošnje za mednarodno zaščito ni in če se država članica, ki daje zahtevo, odloči, da bo v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe (ES) št. [.../...] [o vzpostavitvi sistema „EURODAC“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe dublinske uredbe] podatke iskala v sistemu EURODAC, se zahteva za ponovni sprejem zadevne osebe vloži čim hitreje oziroma v vsakem primeru v dveh mesecih od prejema zadetka EURODAC, kot je opredeljeno v členu 13(4) navedene uredbe.
Where there is no subsequent application for international protection, and in case the requesting Member State decides to search the EURODAC system in accordance with Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No [.../...] [concerning the establishment of “EURODAC” for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Regulation], the request to take back the person concerned shall be made as quickly as possible and in any case within two months of receiving the EURODAC hit, pursuant to Article 13(4) of that Regulation.
Če poznejše prošnje za mednarodno zaščito ni in če se država članica, ki daje zahtevo, odloči, da bo v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe (ES) št. [.../...] [o vzpostavitvi sistema „EURODAC“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe dublinske uredbe] podatke iskala v sistemu EURODAC, se zahteva za ponovni sprejem zadevne osebe vloži čim hitreje oziroma v vsakem primeru v enem mesecu od prejema zadetka EURODAC, kot je opredeljeno v členu 13(4) navedene uredbe.
Where there is no subsequent application for international protection, and in case the requesting Member State decides to search the EURODAC system in accordance with Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No [.../...] [concerning the establishment of “EURODAC” for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Regulation], the request to take back the person concerned shall be made as quickly as possible and in any case within one month of receiving the EURODAC hit, pursuant to Article 13(4) of that Regulation.
Če se država članica, na katero je naslovljena zahteva, strinja , da bo sprejela ali ponovno sprejela prosilca ali drugo osebo iz člena 18(1)(d), država članica, ki daje zahtevo , obvesti zadevno osebo o odločitvi o njegovi predaji v odgovorno državo članico in kjer je ustrezno, o odločitvi, da njegove prošnje za mednarodno zaščito ne bo obravnavala .
Where the requested Member State agrees to take charge or to take back an applicant or another person as referred to in Article 18(1)(d), the requesting Member State shall notify the person concerned of the decision to transfer him/her to the responsible Member State and, where applicable, of not examining his/her application for international protection.
Tovrstno obvestilo je pisno, v jeziku, za katerega se razumno domneva, da ga oseba razume, in se pošlje najpozneje v petnajstih delovnih dneh od datuma prejema odgovora države članice, na katero je zahteva naslovljena.
Such notification shall be made in writing, in a language which the person is reasonably supposed to understand and within no more than fifteen working days from the date of receipt of the reply from the requested Member State.
Tovrstno obvestilo je pisno, v jeziku, za katerega se razumno domneva, da ga prosilec razume, in se pošlje najpozneje v petnajstih delovnih dneh od datuma prejema odgovora države članice, na katero je zahteva naslovljena.
Such notification shall be made in writing, in a language which the applicant is reasonably supposed to understand and within no more than 15 working days from the date of receipt of the reply from the requested Member State.
Glej obrazložitev k predlogu spremembe 49.
See justification for Amendment 49.
Člen 26 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
To obdobje je vsaj deset delovnih dni od dneva obvestila iz člena 25(1).
That period of time shall be not less than 10 working days as from the date of notification referred to in Article 25(1).
V primeru pritožbe zoper odločitev o predaji iz člena 25 ali ponovnega pregleda te odločitve organ iz odstavka 1 tega člena čim prej, v nobenem primeru pa ne pozneje kot v sedmih delovnih dneh od vložitve pritožbe ali zahteve za ponovni pregled, po uradni dolžnosti odloči, ali zadevna oseba sme ostati na ozemlju zadevne države članice ali ne, dokler se njegova pritožba ali ponovni pregled obravnava.
In the event of an appeal or review concerning the transfer decision referred to in Article 25, the authority referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall, acting ex-officio, decide, as soon as possible, and in any case no later than seven working days from the lodging of an appeal or of a review, whether or not the person concerned may remain on the territory of the Member State concerned pending the outcome of his/her appeal or review.
V primeru pritožbe zoper odločitev o predaji iz člena 25 ali ponovnega pregleda te odločitve organ iz odstavka 1 tega člena čim prej, v nobenem primeru pa ne pozneje kot v petih delovnih dneh od vložitve pritožbe ali zahteve za ponovni pregled, na zahtevo zadevne osebe ali, če zah t eva ni bila vložena, po uradni dolžnosti odloči, ali zadevna oseba sme ostati na ozemlju zadevne države članice ali ne, dokler se njegova pritožba ali ponovni pregled obravnava.
In the event of an appeal or review concerning the transfer decision referred to in Article 25, the authority referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall, acting either at the request of the person concerned or, in the absence of such a request, ex-officio, decide, as soon as possible, and in any case no later than five working days from the lodging of an appeal or of a review, whether or not the person concerned may remain on the territory of the Member State concerned pending the outcome of his/her appeal or review.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se pravna pomoč in/ali zastopanje odobrita brezplačno, če zadevne osebe niso sposobne kriti s tem povezanih stroškov .
Member States shall ensure that legal assistance and/or representation be granted free of charge where the person concerned cannot afford the costs involved.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se pravna pomoč in/ali zastopanje na prošnjo odobrita brezplačno, v skladu s členom 15(3) -(6) di re k t ive 2005/85/ES.
Member States shall ensure that the necessary legal assistance and/or representation i s granted on request free of charge in accordance with Article 15(3) to (6) of Directive 2005/85/EC.
Države članice prosilca za azil ali drugo osebo iz člena 18(1)(d), ki je predmet odločitve o predaji v odgovorno državo članico, lahko, ne da bi to posegalo v člen 8(2) Direktive […/…/…] [o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil], če se izkaže za potrebno in na podlagi presoje vsakega posameznega primera ter če ni mogoče učinkovito uporabiti drugih manj prisilnih ukrepov , pridržijo, vendar le če obstaja veliko tveganje, da bo pobegnila.
Without prejudice to Article 8(2) of Directive […/…/EC] [laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers], when it proves necessary, on the basis of an individual assessment of each case, and if other less coercive measures cannot be applied effectively , Member States may detain an asylum-seeker or another person as referred to in Article 18(1)(d), who is subject of a decision of transfer to the responsible Member State, to a particular place only if there is a significant risk of him/her absconding.
Države članice prosilca za azil ali drugo osebo iz člena 18(1)(d), ki je predmet odločitve o predaji v odgovorno državo članico, lahko, ne da bi to posegalo v člen 8(2) Direktive […/…/…] [o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil], če se izkaže za potrebno in na podlagi presoje vsakega posameznega primera, pridržijo v prostorih , ki niso namenjeni priporu, vendar le če drugi manj prisilni ukrepi niso bili učinkoviti in če obstaja tveganje, da bo oseba pobegnila.
Without prejudice to Article 8(2) of Directive […/…/EC] [laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers], when it proves necessary, on the basis of an individual assessment of each case Member States may detain an asylum-seeker or another person as referred to in Article 18(1)(d), who is subject to a decision of transfer to the responsible Member State, in a non-detention facility only if other less coercive measures have not been effective and, only if there is a risk of him/her absconding.
Tu je mogoča nejasnost glede opredelitve „velikega“ tveganja pobega; tveganje pobega kot tako je opredeljeno v točki (l) člena 2.
There might be an ambiguity as to defining a 'significant' 'risk of absconding'; the risk of absconding as such is defined in Article 2 point (l).
Odredba pridržanja v skladu z odstavkom 2 je pisna z navedbo zakonskih in dejanskih razlogov zanjo ter zlasti s podrobno navedbo razlogov, na katerih temelji ugotovitev o obstoju velikega tveganja, da bo zadevna oseba pobegnila, ter časa trajanja pridržanja.
Detention pursuant to paragraph 2 shall be ordered in writing with reasons in fact and in law, in particular specifying the reasons on the basis of which it is considered that there is a significant risk of the person concerned absconding as well as the time period of its duration.
Odredba pridržanja v skladu z odstavkom 2 je pisna z navedbo zakonskih in dejanskih razlogov zanjo ter zlasti s podrobno navedbo razlogov, na katerih temelji ugotovitev o obstoju tveganja, da bo zadevna oseba pobegnila, ter časa trajanja pridržanja.
Detention pursuant to paragraph 2 shall be ordered in writing with reasons in fact and in law, in particular specifying the reasons on the basis of which it is considered that there is a risk of the person concerned absconding as well as the time period of its duration.
Glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe 16.
See justification Amendment 16.
Člen 27 – odstavek 8
Article 27 – paragraph 8
Za vsak primer pridržanja osebe v skladu z odstavkom 2 sodni organ presodi nadaljnje pridržanje v razumnih časovnih presledkih bodisi na zahtevo zadevne osebe ali po uradni dolžnosti.
In every case of a detained person pursuant to paragraph 2, the continued detention shall be reviewed by a judicial authority at reasonable intervals of time either on request by the person concerned or ex-officio.
Pridržanje se ne sme nikoli nedovoljeno podaljšati.
Detention shall never be unduly prolonged.
Za vsak primer pridržanja osebe v skladu z odstavkom 2 sodni organ presodi pridržanje v razumnih časovnih presledkih bodisi na zahtevo zadevne osebe ali po uradni dolžnosti.
In every case of a detained person pursuant to paragraph 2, the detention shall be reviewed by a judicial authority at reasonable intervals of time either on request by the person concerned or ex-officio.
Če termin „nadaljnje“ združimo s terminom „pridržanje“, tvegamo nejasnosti glede vrste pridržanja.
The term 'continued' coupled with the term 'detention' risks to create confusion as to the type of detention in question.
Člen 27 – odstavek 10
Article 27 – paragraph 10
Mladoletnikov se ne pridrži, razen če je to v njihovo največjo korist, kot je določeno v členu 7 te uredbe, in če je v skladu z ugotovitvijo posamezne obravnave njihovega položaja v skladu s členom 11(5) Direktive […/…/ES] [o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil].
Minors shall not be detained unless it is in their best interests, as prescribed in Article 7 of this Regulation and in accordance with an individual examination of their situation in accordance with Article 11(5) of Directive […/…/EC] [laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers].
Mladoletnikov se ne pridrži, razen če je to v njihovo največjo korist, kot je določeno v členu 6(3) te uredbe, in če je v skladu z ugotovitvijo posamezne obravnave njihovega položaja v skladu s členom 11(5) Direktive […/…/ES] [o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil].
Minors shall not be detained unless it is in their best interests, as prescribed in Article 6(3) of this Regulation and in accordance with an individual examination of their situation in accordance with Article 11(5) of Directive […/…/EC] [laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers].
Največje koristi otroka so določene v odstavku 3 člena 6 in ne v členu 7.
The best interests of the child are prescribed in Article 6 paragraph 3 not in Article 7.
Način izvajanja predaj
Mod e of carrying out transfers
Država članica, ki izvaja predajo, spodbuja prostovoljno predajo tako, da prosilcu ponudi ustrezne informacije.
The Member State carrying out the transfer shall promote voluntary transfers by providing adequate information to the applicant.
Če se predaja v odgovorno državo članico izvede v obliki nadzorovanega odhoda ali v spremstvu, države članice zagotovijo, da se izvede na human način in ob popolnem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in človeškega dostojanstva.
If transfers to the Member State responsible are carried out by supervised departure or under escort, Member States shall ensure that they are carried out in a human e manner and with full respect for fundamental rights and human dignity.