natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(10) Da se omogoči uporaba novih digitalnih tehnologij v frekvenčnem pasu 900 MHz, ki bodo delovale skupaj s sistemi GSM, je treba ustrezno spremeniti Direktivo 87/372/EGS in odpraviti zadržanje tega frekvenčnega pasu za GSM –
(10) In order to allow new digital technologies to be deployed in the 900 MHz band in coexistence with GSM systems, Directive 87/372/EEC should be amended accordingly and the exclusive reservation of this band for GSM should be removed,
Direktiva 87/372/EGS se spremeni:
Directive 87/372/EEC is amended as follows:
(1) Člen 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(1) Article 1 is replaced by the following:
„ Člen 1
' Article 1
Države članice omogočijo uporabo frekvenčnih pasov radijskega spektra 880–915 MHz in 925–960 MHz (frekvenčni pas 900 MHz) za sistema GSM in UMTS ter za druge prizemne sisteme, ki lahko zagotavljajo elektronske komunikacijske storitve, ki lahko delujejo skupaj s sistemom GSM, v skladu s tehničnimi izvedbenimi ukrepi, sprejetimi na podlagi Odločbe 676/2002/ES .
Member States shall make available the 880-915 MHz and 925-960 MHz radio spectrum bands (the 900 MHz band) for GSM systems and for UMTS systems as well as for other terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services that can co-exist with GSM systems, in accordance with technical implementing measures adopted pursuant to Decision No 676/2002/EC.
Države članice pri izvajanju te direktive preverijo, ali bi se lahko s sedanjo dodelitvijo frekvenčnega pasu 900 MHz konkurenčnim mobilnim operaterjem na njihovem ozemlju izkrivljala konkurenca na zadevnih mobilnih trgih, ter, kadar je to upravičeno in sorazmerno, odpravijo takšno izkrivljanje v skladu s členom 14 Direktive 2002/20/ES .“
Member States shall, when implementing this Directive, examine whether the existing assignment of the 900 MHz band to the competing mobile operators in their territory is likely to distort competition in the mobile markets concerned and, where justified and proportionate, they shall address such distortions in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2002/20/EC.'
(2) Člen 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(2) Article 2 is replaced by the following:
„ Člen 2
' Article 2
(a) „sistem GSM“ pomeni elektronsko komunikacijsko omrežje, ki je v skladu s standardi GSM, ki jih je objavil Evropski inštitut za telekomunikacijske standarde, zlasti s standardoma EN 301 502 in EN 301 511;
(a) "GSM system" shall mean an electronic communications network that complies with the GSM standards, as published by ETSI, in particular EN 301 502 and EN 301 511;
(b) „sistem UMTS“ pomeni elektronsko komunikacijsko omrežje, ki je v skladu s standardi UMTS, ki jih je objavil Evropski inštitut za telekomunikacijske standarde, zlasti s standardi EN 301 908-1, EN 301 908-2 in EN 301 908-3 ter EN 301 908-11“.
(b) "UMTS system" shall mean an electronic communications network that complies with the UMTS standards as published by ETSI, in particular EN 301 908-1, EN 301 908-2, EN 301 908-3 and EN 301 908-11'.
(3) Člen 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(3) Article 3 is replaced by the following:
„ Člen 3
' Article 3
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, v šestih mesecih po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive within six months after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Države članice predložijo Komisiji besedilo temeljnih predpisov nacionalne zakonodaje, sprejetih na področju, ki ga obravnava ta direktiva.“
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.'
(4) Člen 4 se črta.
(4) Article 4 is deleted.
Ta direktiva začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Za učinkovito politiko radijskega spektra v Evropski uniji je potrebno prožno in usklajeno upravljanje v državah članicah in uskladitev frekvenc na ravni Skupnosti, kadar je to utemeljeno z ekonomijo obsega in medobratovalnostjo naprav in storitev.
An efficient radio spectrum policy in the European Union requires flexible and coordinated management by the Member States and the harmonisation of frequencies at Community level where this is justified for reasons of economies of scale and interoperability of devices and services.
Le tako je mogoče zagotoviti kar najboljši izkoristek družbenih in gospodarskih ugodnosti, ki jih ponuja ta redka javna dobrina, in sicer nižje operativne stroške ter več poslovnih priložnosti ponudnikom storitev elektronskih komunikacij, potrošnikom več in boljše komunikacijske storitve, državljanom pa učinkovitejše zagotavljanje javnih storitev.
This is the only way of ensuring that we can make the most of the social and economic advantages offered by this scarce public resource, in terms of lower operating costs and greater business opportunities for electronic communications service providers, more and better communications services for consumers and the improved provision of public services for citizens.
Tako je namen obravnavanega zakonodajnega predloga širša uporaba frekvenčnega pasu 900 MHz, saj poleg tehnologije mobilnih komunikacij GSM dovoljuje njegovo uporabo za tehnologijo UMTS, ki ponuja večje zmogljivosti.
In this context, the legislative proposal under review is aimed at making greater use of the 900 MHz band by allowing it to be used for UMTS technology, which offers higher capabilities, alongside GSM mobile communications technology.
Tehnične študije, ki jih je izvedla Evropska konferenca uprav za pošto in telekomunikacije (CEPT), potrjujejo, da se obe tehnologiji lahko uporabljata v tem pasu brez motenj.
The technical studies carried out by the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) confirm that both technologies can be used in this band without interference problems.
S tem soglašajo tudi ponudniki storitev mobilnih komunikacij, ki menijo, da je ne le zaželeno temveč tudi nujno dovoliti novo uporabo v tem frekvenčnem pasu, saj jim bo omogočila znižanje stroškov za vzpostavitev infrastrukture UMTS, njihovim strankam pa ponudbo bolj inovativnih storitev po dostopnejših cenah.
There is also a consensus and a feeling of urgency among mobile communications service providers regarding the desirability of permitting this new use in this band, since it will enable them to reduce the costs of deploying UMTS infrastructure and offer more innovative services to their clients at a more affordable price.
Glede na to lahko poročevalka zgolj potrdi, da je dovoljenje za to novo uporabo zaželeno, če naj državljanom omogoči več in boljše komunikacijske storitve po nižjih cenah, in sicer s spremembo zakonodaje, torej popolnoma pregledno ob posvetovanju z javnostjo.
In this light the rapporteur can only confirm the desirability of allowing this new use, with the aim of providing more and better mobile communications services for citizens at a lower price, through an amendment to the legislation, i.e. in a wholly transparent way with public consultation.
Poročevalka prav tako odobrava dejstvo, da je Komisija, potem ko je Parlament zavrnil njen prvotni predlog o razveljavitvi te direktive in reguliranju predmeta te direktive, t.j. uporabe frekvenčnega pasu 900 MHz, z odločbo Komisije v skladu s postopkom komitologije, svoje prvotno stališče spremenila in sedaj predlaga zakonodajni postopek.
The rapporteur also welcomes the fact that, following Parliament’s rejection of the Commission’s initial proposal to repeal this Directive and regulate its subject matter, i.e. the use of the 900 MHz band, through a Commission decision in accordance with a comitology procedure, the Commission has modified its initial stance and is now proposing a legislative procedure.
S tem je ponovno vzpostavila institucionalno ravnovesje in se izognila možnosti, da bi bila odločitev sozakonodajalca spremenjena, ne da bi bil ta vključen v spremembo.
The institutional balance has thus been restored, avoiding a situation where what the co-legislator had decided would have been amended without its involvement.
Predlog Komisije vključuje tudi spremembo direktive, ki bi glede na tehnološki razvoj v prihodnosti omogočala nove uporabe frekvenčnega pasu 900 MHz.
The Commission proposal also includes an amendment to the Directive enabling the 900 MHz band to be opened to new uses in the future, in line with technological development.
Čeprav je takšna klavzula o prožnosti dobrodošla, pa to ne velja za postopek, ki ga predlaga Komisija, namreč regulativni postopek, ki izključuje učinkovit nadzor Parlamenta.
Even though this flexibility clause is welcome, the same cannot be said of the procedure proposed by the Commission: the regulatory procedure which excludes effective scrutiny by Parliament.
Poročevalka ne more razumeti, zakaj naj bi bila prva sprememba namembnosti frekvenčnega pasu zakonodajne narave, odločitev o prihodnjih uporabah pa naj bi se izognila parlamentarnemu nadzoru.
The rapporteur is quite unable to understand why, if the first change to the use of the band is being made through the legislative channel, the decision on subsequent uses should evade parliamentary scrutiny.
Da bi zagotovili pravni instrument, ki omogoča več prožnosti ob prilagajanju novemu tehnološkemu razvoju, ne da bi ogrozili potrebni parlamentarni nadzor, poročevalka predlaga kompromis, da se pri odločitvah o novih uporabah tega frekvenčnega pasu uporabi regulativni postopek s pregledom.
With a view to providing the legal instrument with a greater degree of flexibility to adapt to new technological progress without jeopardising the requisite parliamentary scrutiny, the rapporteur is proposing, by way of compromise, that the regulatory procedure with scrutiny be used to take decisions on new uses for this band.
Namen predlogov sprememb je v uvodnih izjavah utemeljiti novi postopek, ki bolje jamči parlamentarni nadzor, in ga vključiti v člene.
The proposed amendments are intended to justify this new procedure, which offers greater guarantees for parliamentary scrutiny, in the recitals and introduce it in the articles.
Če povzamemo, podpiramo težnje, da se dovoli prožna uporaba tega frekvenčnega pasu, da bi se vzpostavil konkurenčnejši sektor mobilnih komunikacij, ki bo državljanom ponujal več in boljše storitve, istočasno pa opozarjamo, da je treba zagotoviti parlamentarni nadzor pri vseh prihodnjih odločitvah o dodatnih uporabah frekvenčnega pasu, da bi se zagotovila preglednost in spoštovanje institucionalnega ravnovesja.
To sum up, the desirability of allowing flexible use of this band is supported in the interests of bringing about a more competitive mobile communications sector that will offer more and better services for citizens, but at the same time attention is drawn to the need to ensure parliamentary scrutiny of any future decisions on additional uses of the band in order to guarantee transparency and respect for the institutional balance.
o prilagoditvi poslovnika Parlamenta glede na lizbonsko pogodbo
on the adaptation of the Rules of Procedure to the Treaty of Lisbon
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN .....................................................................................40
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................43
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................45
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................48
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0277/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0277/2009 ),
Člen 10 a – odstavek 2 (novo)
Rule 10 a – paragraph 2 (new)
Sedanje besedilo
Present text
Odstavek 1 se smiselno uporablja do začetka veljavnosti ureditve 1 , po kateri se nekaterim državam članicam pred koncem sedmega parlamentarnega obdobja dodelijo dodatni sedeži v Parlamentu.
Paragraph 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis pending the entry into force of the arrangement 1 whereby a number of additional seats in Parliament are allocated to certain Member States until the end of the seventh parliamentary term.
Te države članice so vabljene, da kot opazovalce imenujejo tiste kandidate, ki bi bili izvoljeni, če bi bili dodatni sedeži dodeljeni že pri prejšnjih evropskih volitvah.
The Member States concerned shall be invited to designate as observers those candidates who would have been elected had the additional seats already been allocated at the time of the preceding European elections.
1 Glede na zaključke Evropskega sveta z 11. in 12. decembra 2008.
1 Pursuant to the conclusions of the European Council of 11 and 12 December 2008.
(Predlog spremembe je odvisen od tega, ali bo sprejet drugi predlog spremembe o novem členu 10a iz poročila o splošni reviziji poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta ( 2007/2124(REG) ) – (PE 405.935v04-00))
(This amendment is contingent on the adoption of Amendment 2 concerning a new Rule 10a in the report on the general revision of Parliament's Rules of Procedure ( 2007/2124(REG) )– (PE 405.935v04-00))
Člen 34
Rule 34
Ocena spoštovanja temeljnih pravic, načel subsidiarnosti, sorazmernosti in pravne države ter finančnih posledic
Examination of respect for fundamental rights , the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, the rule of law, and financial implications
Parlament v celoti spoštuje tudi pravice in načela iz člena 2 in člena 6(2) in (3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Parliament shall also fully respect the rights and principles enshrined in Article 2 and in Article 6(2) and (3) of the Treaty on European Union.
Če pristojni odbor, politična skupina ali najmanj štirideset poslancev meni, da predlog zakonodajnega akta ali njegovi deli niso skladni s pravicami iz Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, se zadeva na njihovo zahtevo posreduje pristojnemu odboru za razlago Listine o temeljnih pravicah.
Where the committee responsible, a political group or at least forty Members are of the opinion that a proposal for a legislative act or parts of it do not comply with rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the matter shall, at their request, be referred to the committee responsible for the interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Mnenje tega odbora se priloži poročilu pristojnega odbora.
The opinion of that committee shall be annexed to the report of the committee responsible.
(Glej predloge sprememb člena 36(-1) (novo) ter člena 36 a (novo))
(See amendments to Rule 36 – paragraph -1 (new), and to Rule 36 a (new))
Uvaja nov postopek za spremljanje spoštovanja temeljnih pravic.
Introduces a new procedure for the scrutiny of the respect of fundamental rights.
Predstavlja tudi pravico manjšine.
Constitutes also a minority right.
Člen 36 – odstavek -1 (novo)
Rule 36 – paragraph -1 (new)
Kadar ima predlog zakonodajnega akta finančne posledice, se Parlament prepriča, ali so zagotovljena zadostna finančna sredstva.
Where a proposal for a legislative act has financial implications, Parliament shall establish whether sufficient financial resources are provided.
Besedilo je enako zadnjemu stavku člena 34, vendar je bilo v člen 36 premaknjeno zaradi predloga spremembe 2.
Text of the amendment identical with Rule 34, last phrase, moved to Rule 36 as a consequence of Amendment 2.
Člen 36 a (novo)
Rule 36 a (new)
Člen 36a
Rule 36a
Pregled spoštovanja načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti
Examination of respect for the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality
Razen v nujnih primerih iz člena 4 Protokola o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov v Evropski uniji, Parlament svoje prve obravnave ne zaključi pred pretekom osmih tednov, kot to določa člen 6 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti.
Except in the cases of urgency referred to in Article 4 of the Protocol on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union, Parliament shall not conclude its first reading before the expiry of the deadline of eight weeks laid down in Article 6 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.
Odbor, pristojen za spoštovanje načela subsidiarnosti, se lahko odloči, da za pristojni odbor pripravi priporočila v zvezi s katerim koli predlogom zakonodajnega akta.
The committee responsible for respect of the principle of subsidiarity may decide to make recommendations for the attention of the committee responsible in respect of any proposal for a legislative act.
Če nacionalni parlament predsedniku pošlje obrazloženo mnenje v skladu s členom 3 Protokola o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov v Evropski uniji in členom 6 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, se ta dokument posreduje pristojnemu odboru, v vednost pa tudi odboru, pristojnemu za spoštovanje načela subsidiarnosti.
If a national Parliament sends the President a reasoned opinion in accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union and Article 6 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, that document shall be referred to the committee responsible and forwarded for information to the committee responsible for respect of the principle of subsidiarity.
Če Parlament obrazloženo mnenje prejme po tem, ko je pristojni odbor sprejel svoje poročilo, se ga razdeli vsem poslancem pred glasovanjem kot dokument zasedanja.
When Parliament receives a reasoned opinion after the committee responsible has adopted its report, it shall be distributed to all Members prior to the vote as a session document.
Predsednik pristojnega odbora lahko zahteva, da se zadeva vrne odboru.
The chair of the committee responsible may request that the matter be referred back to the committee.
Če obrazložena mnenja o neskladnosti osnutka zakonodajnega akta z načelom subsidiarnosti predstavljajo vsaj eno tretjino vseh glasov, dodeljenih nacionalnim parlamentom, oziroma četrtino v primeru osnutka zakonodajnega akta, predloženega na podlagi člena 76 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, Parlament ne sprejme sklepa, dokler avtor predloga ne pove, kaj namerava storiti v prihodnje.
Where reasoned opinions on the non-compliance of a draft legislative act with the principle of subsidiarity represent at least one third of all the votes allocated to the national Parliaments or a quarter in the case of a draft legislative act submitted on the basis of Article 76 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Parliament shall not take a decision until the author of the proposal has stated how it intends to proceed.
Če po rednem zakonodajnem postopku obrazložena mnenja o neskladnosti predloga zakonodajnega akta z načelom subsidiarnosti predstavljajo vsaj navadno večino glasov, dodeljenih nacionalnim parlamentom, lahko pristojni odbor po obravnavi obrazloženih mnenj nacionalnih parlamentov in Komisije ter mnenja odbora, pristojnega za spoštovanje načela subsidiarnosti, Parlamentu priporoči, naj predlog zavrne na podlagi kršitve načela subsidiarnosti.
Where, under the ordinary legislative procedure, reasoned opinions on the non-compliance of a proposal for a legislative act with the principle of subsidiarity represent at least a simple majority of the votes allocated to the national Parliaments, the committee responsible, having considered the reasoned opinions submitted by the national Parliaments and the Commission, and having heard the views of the committee responsible for respect of the principle of subsidiarity, may recommend to Parliament that it reject the proposal on the grounds of infringement of the principle of subsidiarity.
To priporočilo lahko vloži tudi desetina poslancev Parlamenta.
Such a recommendation may also be tabled by one tenth of the Members of Parliament.
Mnenje odbora, pristojnega za spoštovanje načela subsidiarnosti, se priloži priporočilu.
The opinion given by the committee responsible for respect of the principle of subsidiarity shall be annexed to any such recommendation.
Če Parlament predloga ne zavrne, se postopek nadaljuje ob upoštevanju vseh priporočil, ki jih je potrdil Parlament.
Where Parliament does not reject the proposal, the procedure shall continue, taking into account any recommendations approved by Parliament.
Če Odbor regij Parlamentu posreduje mnenje, v katerem nasprotuje predlaganemu zakonodajnemu aktu zaradi kršitve načela subsidiarnosti, se mnenje posreduje pristojnemu odboru in odboru, pristojnemu za spoštovanje načela subsidiarnosti.
Where the Committee of the Regions transmits to Parliament an opinion in which it opposes a proposed legislative act on grounds of infringement of the principle of subsidiarity, the opinion shall be referred to the committee responsible and to the committee responsible for respect of the principle of subsidiarity .
Ta lahko predloži priporočila, o katerih se glasuje pred zaključkom prve obravnave.
The latter committee may submit recommendations which shall be put to the vote prior to the conclusion of the first reading.
V poslovnik vnaša nove postopke, ki glede spoštovanja načela subsidiarnosti veljajo za nacionalne parlamente (postopek rumenega in oranžnega kartona).
Transposes the new procedures for the national Parliaments with regard to the respect for the principle of subsidiarity ('yellow card' procedure and 'orange card' procedure) into the Rules of Procedure.
V skladu s členom 8 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti lahko Odbor regij vloži tožbo zaradi kršitve načela subsidiarnosti, zato bi moral Parlament posebej obravnavati vsa mnenja tega odbora, ki bi predlogu akta nasprotoval iz takšnih razlogov.
As pursuant to Article 8 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality the Committee of the Regions can bring an action on grounds of infringement of the principle of subsidiarity, Parliament should give particular consideration to any opinion by this Committee which objects a proposed act on these grounds.
Člen 41
Rule 41
Zakonodajni postopki o pobudah držav članic
Legislative procedures on initiatives originating from a Member State
Pobude držav članic v skladu s členom 76 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije se obravnavajo v skladu s tem členom in členi 34 do 37, 40 in 51 tega poslovnika.
Initiatives originating from a Member State pursuant to Article 76 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union shall be dealt with pursuant to this Rule and to Rules 34 to 37, 40 and 51.
Pristojni odbor lahko povabi predstavnika države članice pobudnice , da pobudo predstavi odboru.
The committee responsible may invite a representative of the originating Member State to present its initiative to the committee.
Pristojni odbor lahko povabi predstavnike držav članic pobudnic , da pobudo predstavijo odboru.
The committee responsible may invite representatives of the originating Member States to present their initiative to the committee.
Člen 54 – odstavek 1
Rule 54 – paragraph 1
V času po sprejetju mnenja Parlamenta o predlogu Komisije predsednik in poročevalec pristojnega odbora spremljata napredek predloga v postopku za njegovo sprejetje v Svetu, zlasti zato, da bi zagotovila natančno upoštevanje s strani Sveta ali Komisije podanih zavez glede v Parlamentu sprejetih sprememb .
In the period following the adoption by Parliament of its opinion on a proposal by the Commission, the chairman and the rapporteur of the committee responsible shall monitor the progress of the proposal in the course of the procedure leading to its adoption by the Council, notably to ensure that the undertakings made by the Council or the Commission to Parliament with respect to its amendments are properly observed.