natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V zadnjih štirih letih ni nobena država uvoznica Svet za sporazum TRIPS obvestila o nameri, da bo uporabila mehanizem za uvoz cenejših življenjsko pomembnih zdravil.
In the last four years, not one importing country has notified the Council for TRIPS that it intends to use the mechanism to import cheaper life-saving medicine.
To bi lahko pomenilo, da mehanizem ni tako učinkovit in da ne rešuje na zadovoljiv način težav glede dostopa do cenovno sprejemljivih zdravil.
It seems, therefore, that the mechanism is not particularly effective, and does not provide a satisfactory means of resolving the problem of accessing medicines at affordable prices.
Parlament lahko sedaj odloči, ali
The European Parliament can now decide whether to:
– da privolitev
- give its assent,
– zavrne privolitev
- withhold its assent, or
– odloži privolitev
- postpone its assent.
Eno od vprašanj, ki se pojavljajo, je, ali ne bi bilo bolje preveriti učinkovitosti mehanizma, ki ga predvideva sklep iz leta 2003, ter opraviti pregled uporabe prilagodljivosti, ki jo sporazum TRIPS ponuja, preden ta postane stalen.
One of the questions raised is whether it would be preferable to ascertain the effectiveness of the mechanism introduced by the 2003 decision and carry out a review of the use made of the flexibilities offered by the TRIPS Agreement before making it permanent.
Odlog privolitve bi Parlamentu omogočil, da preveri, ali bosta vsaj dve tretjini držav članic do 1. decembra sprejeli protokol, v nasprotnem primeru pa, da razmisli, ali naj Evropska unija v bližnji prihodnosti sproži pobudo v okviru STO, da se sklep pregleda in spremeni v dejansko učinkovit instrument; omogočil bi mu tudi, da preveri učinkovitost mehanizma. ter ali dvostranski sporazumi, o katerih se trenutno pogaja Komisija (zlasti sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu z državami AKP in drugi sporazumi z manj razvitimi državami), ne vsebujejo standardov varstva intelektualne lastnine, ki so višji od tistih v sporazumu TRIPS.
Postponing its assent would enable the European Parliament to ascertain whether at least two thirds of Member States accepted the protocol by 1 December and, if not, to consider whether, in the near future, the European Union ought to launch an initiative at the WTO to revise the decision with a view to making it a more genuinely effective instrument; ascertain the effectiveness of the mechanism; and ascertain whether the bilateral agreements currently being negotiated by the Commission (in particular, the economic partnership agreements with the ACP countries and other agreements negotiated with less-developed countries) contain higher levels of intellectual property protection than those contained in the TRIPS Agreement.
Odlog bi Evropski uniji tudi omogočil, da si v okviru medvladne delovne skupine za javno zdravje, inovacije in intelektualno lastnino, ki jo je STO ustanovila leta 2006, spodbujala uporabo pravne prilagodljivosti iz sporazuma TRIPS.
This would also enable the European Union to make every effort, in the Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property set up by the WHO in 2006, to encourage the use of the flexibilities legally provided for under the TRIPS agreement.
Ker pa je v trenutni situaciji ponovno pogajanje o protokolu malo verjetno, poročevalec meni, da bi Evropski parlament dal privolitev, če bi se Svet trdno obvezal, da bo:
However, in view of the fact that, in the present circumstances, it would probably be very difficult to renegotiate the protocol, your rapporteur considers that the European Parliament could give its assent if it received a firm Council commitment to:
– izjavil, da je mehanizem, vzpostavljen s sklepom STO s 30. avgusta 2003 in protokolom k sporazumu TRIPS, kvečjemu delna rešitev problema dostopa do cenovno sprejemljivih zdravil.
- State that the mechanism created by the WTO Decision of 30 August 2003 and the Protocol to the TRIPS Agreement represents, at best, only a small part of the solution to the problem of access to medicines at affordable prices.
– sprejel skupno politično izjavo z Evropskim parlamentom, da lahko države članice EU v skladu z domačim patentnim pravom uporabijo določbo o izjemi iz člena 30 sporazuma TRIPS, da dovolijo proizvodnjo in izvoz z namenom „da se odzovejo na potrebe javnega zdravja v članicah uvoznicah“; naročil Evropski komisiji, naj ne sprejema ukrepov, s katerimi bi se vmešavala v te postopke.
- Adopt a Joint Policy Statement with the European Parliament to the effect that EU Member States are free to use the Article 30 exception provision of the TRIPS Agreement under their domestic patent law to authorise production and export 'to address public health needs in importing Members', and mandate the European Commission to refrain from taking action to interfere with these proceedings.
– naročil Evropski komisiji
- Mandate the European Commission
– naj se v okviru sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu z državami AKP in v okviru drugih prihodnjih dvostranskih in regionalnih sporazumov z revnimi državami v razvoju ne pogaja o določbah TRIPS plus, povezanih s farmacevtskimi proizvodi, ki vplivajo na javno zdravje in dostop do zdravil.
- not to negotiate pharmaceutical-related TRIPS-plus provisions affecting public health and access to medicines in the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with the ACP countries and other future bilateral and regional agreements with poor developing countries
– naj ne zahteva zavezanosti k obveznostim pogodbe o patentnem sodelovanju in pogodbe o patentnem pravu ter njunega sprejemanja, naj ne vključi pogojev iz Direktive 2004/48/ES o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine in naj ne vključi predpisov, kot je varstvo neoriginalnih podatkovnih baz v sporazume o gospodarskem partnerstvu z državami AKP.
- to refrain from requesting adherence to or acceptance of the obligations of the Patent Cooperation treaty and the Patent Law Treaty, to refrain from incorporating the terms of Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights and to not introduce disciplines such as nonoriginal database protection in the EPAs with the ACP countries.
– izjavil, da Evropska unija podpira države v razvoju, ki uporabljajo tako imenovano prilagodljivost iz sporazuma TRIPS, da lahko v okviru domačih programov javnega zdravja zagotavljajo najnujnejša zdravila po dostopni ceni.
- State that the European Union supports the developing countries which use the so-called flexibilities built into the TRIPS Agreement in order to be able to provide essential medicines at affordable prices under their domestic public health programs.
– naročil Evropski komisiji, naj preuči nove rešitve, kot so na primer strategije združevanja javnih naročil, ki jih lahko uporabljajo države ali skupine držav pri iskanju ekonomsko izvedljivih in trajnih rešitev problema dostopa do zdravil po dostopni ceni in naj spodbuja neposredna vlaganja v lokalne proizvodne zmogljivosti v regijah.
- Mandate the European Commission to explore new solutions such as 'pool procurement strategies' which could be used by countries or groups of countries to find viable and long-lasting solutions to the problem of access to medicines at affordable prices and stimulate direct investment in local production facilities within a region.
– naročil Evropski komisiji, naj proaktivno podpira delo medvladne delovne skupine za javno zdravje, inovacije in intelektualno lastnino pri svetovni zdravstveni organizaciji (WHO).
- Mandate the European Commission to pro-actively support the work of the Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property process at the WHO.
– priznal, da mora Evropska unija nujno sprejeti dodatne ukrepe za spodbujanje prenosa tehnologije, raziskav, krepitve zmogljivosti, regijskih oskrbovalnih sistemov in pomoči pri registraciji, da se olajša in poveča proizvodnja farmacevtskih izdelkov v samih državah v razvoju.
- Recognise that the European Union must take additional measures as a matter of urgency with a view to encouraging the transfer of technology, research, capacity strengthening, regional supply systems and help with registration, in order to facilitate and increase the production of pharmaceutical products by the developing countries themselves.
EU mora sprejeti obvezo o določeni ravni financiranja, da posodobi ali zgradi zmogljivosti farmacevtske proizvodnje, ki so v lasti domačinov v državah v razvoju (vključno z najmanj razvitimi državami), ter o povečanju skupnega financiranja javno zasebnih partnerstev, ki se ukvarjajo z raziskavami in razvojem zdravil posebnega pomena za države v razvoju.
The EU must commit to a specified level of funding to upgrade or construct pharmaceutical production facilities owned by local persons in developing (including Least Developed) Countries, and increase its aggregate funding to public private partnerships pursuing research and development of medicines of special relevance to developing countries.
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino kot pristojni odbor je Odbor za pravne zadeve zaprosil za mnenje o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sprejetju protokola o spremembi sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (Sporazum TRIPS), podpisanega 6. decembra 2005 v Ženevi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti.
The Committee on Legal Affairs was asked to draw up an opinion for the Committee on International Trade, the committee responsible, on the proposal for a Council decision on the acceptance, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement, done at Geneva on 6 December 2005.
Še preden ima na razpolago študije in raziskave, s katerimi bi lahko ocenil zadevo, želi Odbor za pravne zadeve podati naslednja opažanja:
Even before it has available the studies and research that would enable it to assess the issue, the Committee on Legal Affairs would like to make the following observations:
– od nas se zahteva odobritev predloga, čeprav ni poročil, ki bi uradno potrjevala dejansko uporabnost sklepa, ki ga je Svetovna trgovinska organizacija sprejela v avgustu 2003;
- we are being asked to approve the proposal although there is no report officially ascertaining the actual usefulness of the WTO decision taken in August 2003;
– od sprejema protokola v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji 6. decembra 2005 (minilo je že več kot šestnajst mesecev) je zgolj 7 držav od 150 izrecno sprejelo dokončno spremembo sporazuma TRIPS, in sicer Združene države Amerike, Švica, Salvador, Republika Koreja, Norveška, Indija in Filipini, kar je presenetljivo malo;
- since the WTO's adoption of the Protocol on 6 December 2005 - now more than 16 months ago - only 7 of the 150 countries concerned have explicitly accepted the definitive amendment of the TRIPS Agreement, namely the United States, Switzerland, Salvador, Korea, Norway, India and the Philippines, which is astonishingly few;
– v zadnjih treh letih in pol nobena država uvoznica ni seznanila Sveta TRIPS, da želi uporabiti mehanizem za uvoz cenejših življenjsko pomembnih zdravil.
- over the past three and a half years no importing country has informed the TRIPS Council that it would like to use the mechanism to import less expensive life-saving medicines.
Še preden je narejena kakršna koli poglobljena študija, zbujajo ta opažanja, ki so povezana zgolj s postopkom, velike dvome o ustreznosti predloga.
Before any detailed study is made, these purely procedural observations raise major doubts about the relevance of the proposal made
Zato je Odbor za pravne zadeve sklenil, da Odboru za mednarodno trgovino posreduje naslednje sklepe:
The Committee on Legal Affairs has therefore decided to address the following conclusions to the Committee on International Trade:
– obžaluje, da se z določbami o prisilnem licenciranju možnosti cenejših zdravil za revne države niso izboljšale toliko, kolikor bi bilo človekoljubno upravičeno;
- regrets that the compulsory licensing provisions do not improve the prospects for cheaper drugs for poor countries as much as can be justified in humanitarian terms;
– priznava, da bo preteklo več let, preden bodo za patente za farmacevtske izdelke v Indiji (na razpolago šele od leta 2005) veljale zahteve iz določb prisilnega licenciranja, in da bodo te zahteve veljale zgolj za nova, patentirana zdravila;
- recognises that it will be several years before pharmaceutical product patents in India, only available since 2005, become subject to the requirements of the compulsory licensing provisions, and that those requirements will only apply to new, patented drugs;
– ugotavlja, da so v uredbi (ES) št. 816/2006
- notes that Regulation (EC) No 816/2006
Uredba (ES) št. 816/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o prisilnih licencah za patente, ki so povezani s proizvodnjo farmacevtskih izdelkov za izvoz v države s težavami v javnem zdravju ( UL L 157, 9.6.2006, str.
Regulation (EC) No 816/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on compulsory licensing of patents relating to the manufacture of pharmaceutical products for export to countries with public health problems ( OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p.
1 ) enake določbe, razširjene na večje število držav, kot je tisto v spremembi sporazuma TRIPS;
1) contains the same provisions, which are extended to more countries than in the TRIPS amendment;
– poudarja, da je pri nadaljnji analizi posledic tega vprašanja in za dialog s Svetom in Komisijo o izboljšavi sedanjega sistema potrebno tesno sodelovanje z Odborom za mednarodno trgovino.
- stresses the need for close co-operation with the Committee on International Trade in its further analysis of the implications of this issue and for dialogue with the Council and the Commission on improvements to the current system.
Kljub temu pa je Odbor za pravne zadeve sklenil, da pozove Odbor za mednarodno trgovino kot pristojni odbor, naj da pravočasno privolitev v predlog sklepa Sveta o sprejetju protokola o spremembi sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (Sporazum TRIPS), podpisanega 6. decembra 2005 v Ženevi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti.
The Committee on Legal Affairs has nevertheless decided to call on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to give assent, in due course, to the proposal for a Council decision on the acceptance, on behalf of the European Communities, of the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement, done at Geneva on 6 December 2005.
Protokol o spremembi Sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (Sporazum TRIPS)
Protocol amending the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Mozambik
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Mozambique
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................12
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................13
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................15
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................16
– ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta ( KOM(2007)0472 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation ( COM(2007)0472 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 in člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 37 and Article 300(2), of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0284/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0284/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj in Odbora za proračun ( A6-0404/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0404/2007 ),
(2a) Finančni prispevek Evropske skupnosti bi bilo treba nameniti razvoju obalnega prebivalstva, ki se preživlja z ribištvom, ter odpiranju majhnih industrijskih obratov za zamrzovanje in predelavo rib na lokalni ravni.
(2a) The European Community's financial contribution should be used for the development of coastal populations living on fisheries and the creation of small industrial fish freezing and processing enterprises at local level;
(2b) Evropski parlament mora biti bolje obveščen.
(2b) It is important to improve the information provided to the European Parliament.
Komisija bi zato morala sklepe sej omenjenega mešanega odbora prenesti na člen 9 partnerskega sporazuma.
To this end, the Commission should forward the conclusions of the meetings of the joint committee referred to in Article 9 of the Agreement.
Predlog spremembe poudarja, kako pomembno je Evropskemu parlamentu posredovati informacije, primerne za oceno sporazuma.
Parliament needs to be supplied with proper information so that it can evaluate the agreement.
Člen 3, pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 3, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Komisija vsako leto oceni, ali so države članice, katerih plovila delujejo v skladu s tem protokolom, izpolnile obveznosti glede poročanja.
The Commission shall evaluate each year whether Member States whose vessels are covered by the Protocol have complied with reporting requirements.
Plovila, ki ne izpolnjujejo najosnovnejše obveznosti, poročanja o svojem ulovu, ne bi smela prejemati finančne podpore od EU.
Vessels that do not comply with the most basic requirement, reporting what they catch, should not benefit from financial support from the EU.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsako leto poroča o rezultatih večletnega sektorskega ribiškega programa, opisanega v členu 7 Protokola.
The Commission shall report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the results of the multiannual sectoral programme described in Article 7 of the Protocol.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu posreduje sklepe sej mešanega odbora, omenjenega v členu 9 partnerskega sporazuma.
The Commission shall forward to the European Parliament the conclusions of the meetings of the joint committee referred to in Article 9 of the Agreement.
V zadnjem letu veljavnosti protokola in pred sklenitvijo novega sporazuma o njegovem podaljšanju Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi poročilo o uporabi omenjenega sporazuma in o pogojih, v katerih se je izvajal.
During the final year of the Protocol's validity and before another agreement is concluded on its renewal, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of the agreement and the conditions under which it was implemented.
Pred sklenitvijo novega sporazuma bi morala Komisija od oblasti države, s katero bo začela pogajanja, zahtevati informacije, na podlagi katerih bo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu posredovala splošno poročilo o presoji.
Before any new agreement is concluded, the Commission should ask the authorities of the country with which it is opening negotiations to provide it with information on the basis of which it will submit a general assessment report to Parliament and the Council.
Na podlagi poročila iz člena 3(a) in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom Svet podeli Komisiji, če je potrebno, pogajalski mandat za sprejetje novega protokola.
On the basis of the report referred to in Article 3a and after consulting the European Parliament, the Council shall, where appropriate, grant the Commission a negotiating mandate with a view to the adoption of a new protocol.
Evropski parlament in Svet bosta lahko svoje obveznosti izpolnila le na podlagi poročila o oceni izvajanja sporazuma o ribolovu.
Parliament and the Council will be able to discharge their respective duties only on the basis of the evaluation report on the application of the fisheries agreement.
Odnosi na področju ribištva med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Mozambik imajo dolgo zgodovino.
There is a long history of fisheries relations between the European Community and the Republic of Mozambique.
Prvi sporazum o ribolovu med obema pogodbenicama, ki je začel veljati leta 1987, je lastnikom plovil nudil možnosti ribolova kozic in tunov v zameno za finančno nadomestilo.
The first fisheries agreement between the two parties, which entered into force in 1987, offered Community shipowners fishing opportunities for shrimp and tuna in return for financial compensation.
Oktobra 2002 je bil parafiran nov sporazum.
A new agreement was initialled in October 2002.
Skupaj s protokolom je začel veljati 7. januarja 2004 za obdobje treh let.
That agreement and its protocol came into force on 7 January 2004 for a period of three years.
Skupnost se je pogajala in 21. decembra 2006 parafirala sporazum, ki ribičem Skupnosti dodeljuje ribolovne možnosti v ribolovnem območju Mozambika.
The Community has now negotiated and initialled, on 21 December 2006, an agreement granting fishing opportunities to Community fishermen in the Mozambique fishing zone.
Ta sporazum skupaj s protokolom in njegovo prilogo je bil sklenjen za pet let od datuma začetka njegove veljavnosti in se lahko podaljša.
Accompanied by a protocol and the annex thereto, the agreement has been signed for a period of five years (renewable) from its entry into force.
Sporazum z dnem začetka svoje veljavnosti razveljavi in nadomesti sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Mozambik o ribolovu v obalnih vodah Mozambika ter z njim povezani protokol.
On the date of its entry into force, this agreement repeals and replaces the EC-Mozambique agreement on fishing off the coast of Mozambique and the corresponding protocol.
Novi protokol podpira odgovorni in trajnostni ribolov ter omogoča razvoj partnerskih odnosov, ki temeljijo na spoštovanju zakonodajnih in ureditvenih predpisov, veljavnih na področju ribištva v Mozambiku.
This new protocol is geared to responsible and sustainable fishing and makes it possible to develop partnership relations based on respect for Mozambique's fisheries regulations.
Njegov glavni cilj je okrepitev sodelovanja med Evropsko skupnostjo in Mozambikom.
Its main objective is to strengthen cooperation between the European Community and Mozambique.
Spodbujal bo še posebej gospodarsko, znanstveno in tehnično sodelovanje v ribiškem in z njim povezanih sektorjih, da se v interesu obeh pogodbenic oblikuje partnerski okvir za razvoj trajnostne ribiške politike in odgovornega izkoriščanja ribolovnih virov.
In particular, it will encourage economic, scientific and technical cooperation in the fisheries sector and all related sectors, with a view to establishing a framework of partnership in which to develop a sustainable fisheries policy and responsible exploitation of fisheries resources, in the interests of both parties.
Kar zadeva ribolovne možnosti za plovila ES, bo ribolov dovoljen 44 plovilom z zaporno plavarico in 45 plovilom s površinskim parangalom.
As regards the fishing opportunities granted to Community vessels, 44 purse seine vessels and 45 surface longliners are allowed to fish.
Protokol določa referenčno tonažo 10.000 ton tunov na leto.
The protocol fixes a reference tonnage of 10 000 tonnes of tuna per year.
Določeno je, da mora biti ribolovni napor ES v izključni ekonomski coni Mozambika v skladu z ustrezno oceno staleža tunov, ki temelji na znanstvenih merilih, vključno z letnimi znanstvenimi poročili, ki jih izvaja Komisija za tune v Indijskem oceanu (IOTC).
It is established that the EC fishing effort in Mozambique's EEZ will have to be in line with appropriate tuna stock assessments based on scientific criteria, including the scientific overviews conducted by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC).
V obdobju uporabe tega protokola Skupnost vsako leto plača finančni prispevek v znesku 900.000 EUR.
The financial contribution is fixed at EUR 900 000 to be paid annually by the Community during the period of application of the protocol.