natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glede postopkovnih zaščitnih ukrepov odbor LIBE meni, da bi morala direktiva zagotoviti, da prekrške odkrivajo avtomatske naprave ali jih ugotavljajo pristojni organi pregona, ko se zgodijo, in da se postopek obveščanja sklada z načelom pravne države in privilegijem zoper samoobdolžitev.
With regard to procedural guaranties, it is the opinion of the LIBE Committee that the Directive should provide that the offence must be detected by automated equipments or by competent law enforcement authorities at the time of its occurrence and that the notification procedure is compliant with the rule of law and notably with the principle of non self-incrimination.
Odbor LIBE se strinja z mnenjem evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov, da predlog ustreza zahtevam v zvezi z varovanjem podatkov.
Finally, the LIBE Committee agrees with the opinion delivered by the EDPS, stating that the proposal is compliant with data protection requirements.
Člen 1 – odstavek 1 – točka d e (novo)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point d e (new)
(de) vse druge večje prekrške, ki ogrožajo varnost v cestnem prometu.
(de) any other major road safety offences;
Direktiva bi morala odražati prizadevanja evropskih mest in regij glede izvajanja inovativnih trajnostnih prometnih politik, kot so cestne pristojbine, zelena območja in omejitve za promet, da bi se povečala hitrost javnih prometnih sredstev v mestih in s tem spodbudila sprememba načina prevoza.
The directive should reflect the efforts of Europe’s cities and regions to implement innovative sustainable transport policies such as road charging, green zones and traffic restrictions to improve the speed of public transport modes in cities to encourage modal shift.
Izzivi, kot so podnebne spremembe, onesnaževanje in zastoji, so skupni vsem evropskim mestom, učinkovit čezmejni mehanizem pregona za podpiranje teh inovativnih politik pa je ključnega pomena.
Challenges such as climate change, pollution and congestion are common to all Europe’s cities and an effective cross-border enforcement mechanism to underpin these innovative policies is crucial.
Člen 1 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 1 - paragraph 1 a (new)
(1a) Prekršek vožnje pod vplivom alkohola se najprej lahko odkrije samo z merjenjem alkohola v izdihanem zraku.
(1a) The offence of drink-driving may be detected in first instance only by means of a breathalyzer.
Vzorec krvi se lahko odvzame le, če se osumljenec strinja.
Blood samples may be taken only with the consent of the suspect.
Če osumljenec zavrne odvzem krvi, ne bi smelo biti pravnih posledic.
No legal consequence may come from the refusal of the suspect to give a blood sample
Odvzem krvi bi lahko pomenil globok poseg v temeljne pravice, če bi bil opravljen brez privolitve osumljenca.
Taking blood samples could deeply affect fundamental rights if done without the consent of the suspect.
Zato bi bilo treba dati prednost manj vsiljivim načinom odkrivanja, kot je merjenje alkohola v izdihanem zraku.
Priority should therefore be given to other less intrusive means of detection such as the breathalyzer.
Potrebna je določba, ki bi jasno opredelila, da ni mogoče nikogar obvezati, da bi dal vzorec krvi, pri čemer se upošteva področje direktive (prometni prekrški, ne huda kazniva dejanja).
A provision clearly stating that nobody can be obliged to provide a blood sample is therefore required keeping in mind the scope of the Directive (traffic offences not serious crimes).
Člen 1 – odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 1 - paragraph 2 a (new)
(2a) Ta direktiva se uporablja samo za cestnoprometne prekrške, ki jih zaznajo avtomatske naprave ali v primeru uporabe neavtomatskega načina ugotovijo pristojni organi pregona v času storitve dejanja.
(2a) This Directive shall apply only to the road traffic offences detected by means of automated equipment or, in the event of non-automated means being used, by competent law enforcement authorities at the time of its commission.
(da) „osrednji organ“ pomeni organ, ki je odgovoren za zagotavljanje varstva podatkov v vsaki državi članici;
(da) “central authority” means the authority responsible for ensuring data protection in each Member State ;
Obvestilo o prekršku vsebuje zadevo obvestila, ime organa, odgovornega za izvajanje sankcij in namen obvestila, ime pristojnega organa, ki je odgovoren za izvajanje te direktive, in opis bistvenih podrobnosti zadevnega prekrška, znesek denarne kazni, ki jo mora imetnik plačati, in rok plačila, podatke o možnostih imetnika, da izpodbija razloge za obvestilo o prekršku , izjavo o njegovem privilegiju zoper samoobdolžitev, in pravici, da se pritoži zoper odločbo o plačilu denarne kazni, ter postopek, po katerem se je treba ravnati v primeru ugovora ali pritožbe.
The offence notification shall contain the subject of the notification, the name of the authority responsible for enforcing the sanctions and the purpose of the notification, the name of the competent authority responsible for applying this Directive, a description of the relevant details of the offence concerned and the amount of the financial penalty that the holder is required to pay, the date by which it must be paid, the possibilities for the holder to contest the grounds for the offence notification , a statement of her/his privileges against self-incrimination and of his/her right to appeal against a decision imposing a financial penalty, and the procedure to be followed in case of dispute or appeal.
Zdi se pomembno, da je prejemnik obvestila jasno obveščen o prekršku, organu, ki ga je odkril, in o predmetu obvestila.
It seems relevant for the addressee of the notification that he/she is clearly informed about the offence, the authority that has detected it and about the object of the notification.
Kakršna koli denarna kazen, ki bo izrečena v skladu s to direktivo, bo nediskriminatorna z vidika nacionalnosti in izrečena v skladu z zakonodajo države prekrška.
Any financial penalty imposed under this Directive shall be non-discriminatory in terms of nationality and shall be imposed under the law of the State of offence.
Člen 5 – odstavek 4 a (novo)
Article 5 - paragraph 4 a (new)
(4a) Privilegij zoper samoobdolžitev se prizna v vsakem primeru.
(4a) In any event privilege against self-incrimination shall be granted.
Imetnik ni odgovoren, če ni vozil in ne more navesti identitete voznika.
The holder shall not be held liable if he/she was not driving and he/she is unable to indicate the identity of the driver.
Priloga – stran 3 (Bistvene podrobnosti o prekršku) – točka b – pododstavek 3
Annex – page 3 (Relevant details concerning the offence) - point b - subparagraph 3
prekoračitev dovoljene hitrosti, vožnja pod vplivom alkohola, neuporaba varnostnega pasu ali zadrževalnega sistema za otroke, vožnja skozi rdečo luč:
speeding, drink-driving, non-use of seatbelt or child restraint system, failing to stop at a red traffic light.
prekoračitev dovoljene hitrosti, vožnja pod vplivom alkohola, neuporaba varnostnega pasu ali zadrževalnega sistema za otroke, vožnja skozi rdečo luč , prekrški v tekočem prometu, večji prekrški, ki ogrožajo varnost v cestnem prometu .
speeding, drink-driving, non-use of seatbelt or child restraint system, failing to stop at a red traffic light, moving traffic offences, major road safety offences.
Če je področje uporabe direktive razširjeno, mora biti ta sprememba vidna v obvestilu.
If the scope of the directive is extended, the notice needs to reflect this change.
Priloga – obrazec obvestila o prekršku – stran 4
Annex - form for the offence notification - page 4
Ste vi vozili vozilo v času storitve prekrška (da/ne)
Were you the driver of the vehicle at the time of the commission of the offence (yes/no)
Če niste vozili vozila v času storitve prekrška, ali lahko navedete identiteto voznika (da/ne)
If you were not the driver of the vehicle at the time of the commission of the offence, are you able to indicate the identity of the driver (yes/no)
(3) Če se ne strinjate, ali niste želeli navesti identitete voznika, navedite razloge zakaj:
(3) If you do not acknowledge this, or if you refused to reveal the identity of the driver, please explain why:
o odobritvi skupne izjave o partnerstvu za komuniciranje o Evropi
on the approval of the joint declaration on Communicating Europe in Partnership
(Poenostavljen postopek – člen 43(1) Poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure - Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
(*) Bo objavljena ločeno kot DOPOLNILO k temu poročilu.
(*) will be published separately as ADDENDUM to this report
Evropski parlament ,
- The European Parliament ,
- ob upoštevanju člena 255 Pogodbe ES,
- having regard to Article 255 of the EC-Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. marca 2002 o Sporočilu Komisije o novem okviru za sodelovanje pri dejavnostih politike informiranja in komuniciranja Evropske unije
- having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2002 on the Commission communication on a new framework for co-operation on activities concerning the information and communication policy of the European Union
UL C 47 E, 27.02.03, str.
OJ C 47 E, 27.2.2003, p.
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. aprila 2003 o informacijski in komunikacijski strategiji za Evropsko unijo
- having regard to its resolution of 10 April 2003 on an information and communication strategy for the European Union
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. maja 2005 o izvajanju informacijske in komunikacijske strategije Evropske unije
- having regard to its resolution of 12 May 2005 on the implementation of the European Union’s information and communication strategy
3 UL C 92 E, 20.04.06, str.
3 OJ C 92 E, 20.4.2006, p.
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. novembra 2006 o Beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki
- having regard to its resolution of 16 November 2006 on the White Paper on a European communication policy
- ob upoštevanju sklepa, ki ga je 25. septembra 2008 sprejela konferenca predsednikov,
- having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 25 September 2008,
- ob upoštevanju predlagane skupne izjave o partnerstvu za komuniciranje o Evropi,
- having regard to the proposed joint declaration on Communicating Europe in Partnership,
- ob upoštevanju člena 120(1) in člena 43(1) svojega poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 120(1) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0372/2008 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6-0372/2008 ),
A. ker je komuniciranje pomemben sestavni del predstavniške in participativne demokracije,
A. whereas communication is an important element of both representative and participatory democracy,
B. ker je ena od prednosti demokratičnih elementov EU povezana s komunikacijskimi strukturami na evropski ravni, ki institucije povezujejo z državljani,
B. whereas one of strengths of the democratic elements of the EU is connected to communication structures at the European level which link the institutions with citizens,
C. ker izkušnje iz preteklih evropskih volitev in referendumov kažejo, da bodo na njih verjetneje sodelovali tisti, ki poznajo in jih zanimajo vprašanja, povezana z EU, medtem ko je manj verjetno, da se jih bodo udeležili tisti, ki v zvezi s tem niso tako dobro obveščeni; ker se je to ponovno potrdilo z raziskavami po referendumu na Irskem,
C. whereas the experience gained from past European elections and referendums suggest that those who are aware of, and interested in, EU issues are more likely to participate, while those who are not as well informed are less likely to do so; whereas this was once again confirmed by research done following the Irish referendum,
D. ker komuniciranje o Evropski uniji zahteva politično zavezo institucij EU in držav članic na vseh ravneh,
D. whereas communicating on the European Union requires a political commitment of EU Institutions and Member States at all levels,
Bo objavljena ločeno kot dopolnilo k temu poročilu.
will be published separately as Addendum to this report
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o delu prek agencij za zagotavljanje začasnega dela
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on temporary agency work
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (10599/2/2008 – C6‑0327/2008 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (10599/2/2008 – C6‑0327/2008 ),
368. o predlogu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2002)0149 ),
368. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2002)0149 ),
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2002)0701 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2002)0701 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve za drugo obravnavo ( A6-0373/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0373/2008 ),
Komisija je 20. marca 2002 v okviru lizbonske strategije sprejela predlog direktive o delovnih pogojih za začasne delavce, da bi zagotovila minimalno raven zaščite za začasne delavce ter agencijam za zagotavljanje začasnega dela pomagala razviti ustrezne možnosti za delodajalce in delavce in zakonski okvir.
On 20 March 2002 the Commission adopted, as part of the Lisbon Strategy, a proposal for a directive on ‘working conditions for temporary workers’ seeking to guarantee a minimum level of protection for temporary workers and help the temporary employment sector to work out appropriate options for employers and workers and a framework for them to operate in.
V predlogu direktive je bilo vzpostavljeno načelo nediskriminacije med delavci, ki jih posredujejo agencije za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, in delavci na podobnih delovnih mestih, zaposlenih v podjetjih uporabnikih, tudi glede plačila, pod pogojem, da delovno razmerje z istim delodajalcem traja več kot šest tednov.
The proposal for a directive established the principle of non-discrimination between temporary agency workers and comparable workers in the user undertakings, including in the matter of pay, provided that the employment relationship with the same employer lasts for more than six weeks.
Vendar je bilo predvideno tudi odstopanje od tega načela v primeru kolektivnih dogovorov.
However, a derogation from this principle was provided for in the case of collective agreements.
Predlog direktive je sledil neuspelim enoletnim pogajanjem med socialnimi partnerji leta 2000 in 2001.
The proposal for a directive followed the failure of a year of negotiations between the social partners in 2000-2001.
Evropski parlament je po postopku iz člena 251 Pogodbe mnenje sprejel na prvi obravnavi 21. novembra 2002.
Acting in accordance with Article 251 of the Treaty, the European Parliament gave its opinion at first reading on 21 November 2002.
Na predlog Komisije so bile vložene številne spremembe, da bi imeli delavci, zaposleni pri agencijah za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, zagotovljeno osnovno zaščito ter da bi omejili in zakonsko uredili možnosti za odstopanje od načela nediskriminacije.
Numerous amendments were made to the Commission proposal with a view to guaranteeing essential protection to temporary workers and to restricting, and providing a framework for, any derogations from the non-discrimination principle.
V skladu s členom 251(2) Pogodbe ES je 15. septembra 2008 tudi uradno sprejel skupno stališče.
In accordance with Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty, it formally adopted its common position on 15 September 2008.
Prispevki iz prve obravnave
Contributions of the first reading
Poročevalec želi poudariti, da je pomembno delo v prvi obravnavi leta 2002 opravila poročevalka Ieke van den Burg.
Your rapporteur is anxious to underline the importance of the work carried out at first reading in 2002 by the rapporteur Ieke van den Burg.
Vodilo pri spremembah predloga Komisije so bili trije splošni cilji načela enakopravnega obravnavanja delavcev:
The amendments made to the Commission proposal were guided by three major objectives arising from the principle of equal treatment between workers:
· enako obravnavanje delavcev, zaposlenih pri agencijah za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, in drugih delavcev z zagotavljanjem enakega statusa in varnosti;
• ‘equal treatment for agency workers compared with other workers as regards employment status and security’;
· spoštovanje socialnih standardov v podjetjih uporabnikih z enakim obravnavanjem glede plače in pogojev med delavci, zaposlenih pri agencijah za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, in delavci, zaposlenih v podjetjih uporabnikih; in
• respect for ‘established social standards in user firms through equal treatment as regards pay and conditions between agency workers and comparable workers in user firms’; and finally
· priznavanje sektorja agencij za zagotavljanje začasnega dela kot legitimne in strokovne poslovne dejavnosti z odpravo nepotrebnih omejitev in prepovedi.
• ‘recognition of the temporary agency sector as legitimate and professional business by removing unnecessary restrictions and permits/bans’.
V skladu s tem je Parlament sprejel spremembe, s katerimi želi jasno poudariti, da imajo vsi delavci, ki jih posredujejo agencije za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, pravico do osnovne zaščite od prvega delovnega dne in da mora ta zaščita zajemati pravico do zaščite v okviru delovne zakonodaje, enako plačilo za enako delo in socialno varstvo.
Parliament accordingly adopted amendments seeking to make clear that all temporary agency workers should have the right to basic protection from day one and that this protection includes the right to benefit from labour law, equal pay with other staff and social protection.
Sprejel je tudi spremembe, s katerimi želi zavrniti odstopanja od nediskriminacijske klavzule, razen posameznih izjem (na primer v primeru pogodb za določen čas, podpisanih z agencijo za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, ali kadar kolektivne pogodbe zagotavljajo ustrezno zaščito).
Parliament also adopted amendments seeking to reject exemptions from the non-discrimination provision except in particular cases (e.g. in the case of an open-ended contract with a temporary employment agency or where collective agreements ensure adequate protection).
Analiza skupnega stališča
T he common position
Skupno stališče upošteva potrebo po vzpostavitvi ustreznega okvira za uporabo dela prek agencij za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, da bi s tem prispevali k odpiranju delovnih mest in razvoju prožnih oblik dela, pri čemer bi bili delavci zaščiteni.
The common position takes account of the need to establish a suitable framework for the use of temporary agency work with a view to contributing effectively to the creation of jobs and to the development of flexible forms of working, while protecting workers.
V skupnem stališču je tudi ohranjena velika večina predlogov sprememb, ki jih je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi, namreč tistih, ki zagotavljajo enakopravno obravnavanje (vključno z enakostjo plač) delavcev v podjetju uporabniku.
This common position has incorporated the great majority of the amendments adopted by Parliament at first reading, among them the amendments guaranteeing equal treatment (including equal pay) between the workers of the user undertaking.
Svet je tako menil, da mora biti enakopravno obravnavanje s prvim dnem dela splošno pravilo, o vsakem odstopanju od tega načela pa bi se morali dogovoriti socialni partnerji, bodisi s kolektivnimi pogajanji ali s sporazumi, sklenjenimi s socialnimi partnerji na nacionalni ravni (člen 5).
The Council has thus taken the view that equal treatment from day one should be the general rule, and that any derogation from that principle should be agreed by the social partners, by collective negotiations or by agreements with the social partners at national level (Article 5).
V skupnem stališču so bili tudi ohranjeni predlogi sprememb o opredelitvi osnovnih delovnih pogojev in pogojev zaposlovanja delavcev iz agencij za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, zlasti z vključitvijo plačila (člen 3).
Parliament’s amendments on the definitions of the basic working and employment conditions of temporary agency workers, particularly the insertion of ‘pay’ (Article 3), have also been incorporated in the common position.
Prav tako so bili ohranjeni predlogi sprememb v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve, bonitet in poklicnega usposabljanja (člen 6) ter zastopanjem delavcev, zaposlenih pri agencijah za zagotavljanje začasnega dela (člen 7).
Finally, the Council's common position has retained the amendments on access to employment, collective facilities and vocational training (Article 6) and on the representation of temporary agency workers (Article 7).
Poročevalec poudarja, da varnost, zdravje in higiena pri delu sicer niso bili ohranjeni kot osnovni delovni pogoji, kot je to zahteval Evropski parlament, vendar te že zagotavlja direktiva 91/383/EGS z dne 25. junija 1991, s katero se dopolnjujejo ukrepi za spodbujanje izboljšav glede varnosti in zdravja pri delu za delavce z delovnim razmerjem za določen čas ali z začasnim delovnim razmerjem.
Your rapporteur also stresses that, while health, safety and hygiene at work have not been incorporated as basic working and employment conditions as Parliament had asked, they are in practice already guaranteed by Council Directive No 91/383/EEC of 25 June 1991 supplementing the measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of workers with a fixed-duration employment relationship or a temporary employment relationship.
Priporočila za drugo obravnavo
Recommendations for second reading
Nacionalne zakonodaje na področju začasnega dela se še vedno močno razlikujejo.
Large disparities still exist today between different countries’ national legislations on temporary agency work.
Včasih so še precejšnje razlike glede plačila, začasni delavci pa tudi delajo v težjih delovnih pogojih.
There are also sometimes major inequalities in pay, and tougher working conditions, for temporary workers.
Ti delavci so zlasti bolj izpostavljeni fizičnim nevarnostim, intenzivnost dela in delovne norme pa so pogosto večje kot za druge delavce.
In particular, such workers are more exposed to physical risks, and the intensity and pace of their work are often higher than for other workers.
V Nemčiji, na Nizozemskem ali v Španiji zakonska ureditev tega sektorja temelji predvsem na splošni zakonodaji brez specifičnih predpisov.
In Germany, the Netherlands and Spain, the regulation of the sector is essentially covered by general legislation, and there is no specific body of rules.
Zakonodajni okvir v Združenem kraljestvu ali na Irskem je zelo ohlapen.
In the United Kingdom and Ireland, the legislative framework in place is very flexible.
V Belgiji, Franciji in Italiji je področje začasnega dela urejeno s posebnimi predpisi, ki zajemajo odnos med agencijo za zagotavljanje začasnega dela, podjetjem uporabnikom in delavcem ter status delavca.
In Belgium, France and Italy, there is specific interim legislation covering the relationship between the temporary employment agency, the user undertaking and the worker, and the status of the worker.
Vendar se v vseh državah Evropske unije začasno delo razvija, čeprav se delež teh delavcev v različnih državah precej razlikuje.
Nonetheless, in all countries of the European Union, temporary agency work is on the increase, even though the proportion of workers concerned varies considerably from one country to another.
Danes je sprejetje zakonodaje, ki bo zaščitila začasne delavce in razjasnila, kako agencije za zagotavljanje začasnega dela delujejo, še bolj upravičeno in nujno kot pred šestimi leti.
There is thus even more justification and need for the adoption of legislation to protect temporary agency workers and clarify the framework within which temporary employment agencies operate than there was six years ago.