natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Proračunska sredstva EU za raziskave niso ustrezno razporejena glede na izzive, navedene v naših srednjeročnih in dolgoročnih ciljih; in tudi ne odražajo prednosti, ki jo Komisija, Svet in Parlament v več zaporednih izjavah o politiki namenjajo soočanju s podnebnimi spremembami.
EU research budgets have not properly factored in the challenges presented by our medium and long term targets; and do not reflect the priority that the Commission, Council and Parliament has placed on tackling climate change in repeated policy statements.
V sedmem okvirnem programu izdatki EU za energetske raziskave trenutno predstavljajo en del stroškov, predvidenih za doseganje ciljev do leta 2020 (2,3 milijarde EUR od skupno 700 milijard EUR).
Currently, under FP7, the EU spending on energy research a fraction of what the 2020 targets will cost (EUR 2.3bn vs a potential EUR 700bn).
Načrta SET ni mogoče izvajati z majhnim zneskom, ki ga daje na voljo sedmi okvirni program, ali zgolj s spodbujanjem prostovoljnega dodeljevanja sredstev s strani industrije, držav članic, lokalne in regionalne vlade ter finančnih ustanov.
The SET Plan cannot be implemented using the small amount of funding available under FP7, or by simply encouraging voluntary commitments of resources from industry, Member States, local and regional government and financial institutions.
Če hočemo, da bodo ti organi dodelili več sredstev, moramo začeti dodeljevati večja sredstva na ravni EU.
If we want to these bodies to commit more resources then we must start by committing greater resources at the EU level.
Vse torej govori v prid znatnemu povečanju podpore energetskim tehnologijam na ravni EU.
There is a clear case, therefore, for a substantial increase in support for energy technologies at EU level.
Povečanje proračunskih sredstev za energetske raziskave, predstavitvene dejavnosti in trženje za dodatnih 10 milijard EUR do izteka finančne perspektive 2007–2013 bi bil v danih okoliščinah dokaj skromen prispevek.
An increase in the budget for energy research, demonstration and commercialisation by an additional EUR 10 billion until the end of Financial Perspective 2007-2013 would seem a rather modest contribution in the circumstances.
Financiranje je zlasti skromno v predstavitveni fazi in fazi trženja novih tehnologij.
Funding is particularly lacking in the demonstration and commercialisation phase of new technologies.
To je še posebej pomembno za razvoj tehnologij, potrebnih za doseganje ciljev EU do leta 2020.
This is particularly important for the development of technologies needed for the EU's 2020 target.
Verjetno pa bodo potrebna tudi večja vlaganja v raziskave, ki so ključnega pomena za tehnologije, predvidene za leto 2030 in pozneje; zato je pomembno, da se vlaganja v prednostne naloge s področja energije povečajo tudi v okvirnih programih.
But increased investment in research, key to the development of technologies for 2030 and beyond, is also likely to be needed; so it is important to also increase the financing of the energy priorities in the Framework Programmes.
To je pravzaprav nujno.
This is a matter of urgency.
Glede na časovne roke za predstavitvene dejavnosti in trženje novih tehnologij leto 2020 ni daleč.
Looked at in terms of the lead times for the demonstration and commercialisation of new technologies, 2020 is not far away.
Nemudoma so potrebna nova vlaganja, če naj bi imela vpliv v tem obdobju in če res želimo pomagati naši energetski industriji in celotnemu gospodarstvu EU.
New investments are needed immediately if they are to have an impact in this timescale, and if we really want to help our energy industry and the whole EU economy.
Škoda, da proračunski postopek EU ni časovno usklajen z načrtom SET.
It is unfortunate that the EU budgeting process is out of step with the SET plan.
Vendar bi Komisija morala raziskati možnosti za dodeljevanje dodatnih sredstev.
But the Commission should explore for opportunities to deploy additional resources.
Povečano financiranje s strani EU ne more nadomestiti nobenega drugega financiranja iz zasebnega ali javnega sektorja.
This increased level of EU-level funding cannot be a substitute for any other public or private sector funding.
Mehanizmi financiranja bi morali biti oblikovani tako, da bi vplivali na zasebne in javne vire in jih pritegnili.
Funding mechanisms should be designed which leverage and pull together private and other sources of funding.
Financiranje EU bi moralo biti tudi usklajeno z instrumenti za povečanje povpraševanja, kot so proizvodni standardi in trgovanje z emisijami.
EU funding should also work in tandem with 'market pull' instruments, such as product standards and Emissions Trading.
Vendar pa bo več sredstev na ravni EU okrepilo zaupanje vseh javnih organov in zasebnega sektorja v sodelovanje in skupne naložbe.
But increasing funding at EU level will increase the confidence of all the public authorities and the private sector to work together and invest.
V tem pogledu so predlagane evropske industrijske pobude velikega pomena.
The proposed European Industrial Initiatives are an important proposal in this regard.
Komisija je predlagala, naj bi te pobude nastopale v različnih oblikah, upoštevajoč potrebe posameznih tehnologij ali sektorjev.
The Commission has proposed that these Initiatives should take different forms according to the needs of their particular technology/ sector.
Proces bi moral potekati od spodaj navzgor, upoštevajoč predloge iz industrije, zainteresiranih držav članic ter regionalnih in lokalnih vlad in/ali raziskovalnih centrov, pri čemer bi bila v veliko spodbudo možnost pridobivanja sredstev EU.
This should be a bottom up process, driven by proposals from the industry, interested Member States, regional and local government, and/or research centres, with the potential for EU funding acting as an important catalyst.
Na ta način bi zagotovili osnovo za strateške povezave med temi organi in mehanizem, preko katerega bi se lahko zbirali in usmerjali finančni prispevki.
In this way, they will provide the basis for strategic alliances between these bodies, and a mechanism within which financial contributions can be pooled and focussed.
Obstoječa podpora je razdrobljena, potrebno je boljše usklajevanje
Existing support is fragmented and needs better co-ordination
Načrt SET tudi navaja, da je obstoječa podpora razdrobljena, zato bi jo bilo treba bolje usklajevati.
The SET Plan also indicates that existing support is fragmented, and needs to be better co-ordinated.
Dobrodošli sta nova usmerjevalna skupina Evropske skupnosti za države članice in nova evropska zveza organizacij za energetske raziskave pri nacionalnih raziskovalnih inštitutih.
The new European Community Steering Group of Member States and new European Energy Research Alliance of National Research Institutes are welcome.
Bistvenega pomena je tudi posredovanje novih informacij o razvoju tehnologij in zmogljivostih, kar bo zagotovilo, da bodo vsi partnerji delovali iz istih izhodišč in se odločali za primerljive prednostne naloge.
Also of critical importance is the provision of new information on technology development and capacities, which will ensure that all partners are working to the same assumptions, with similar priorities.
To je prvo področje gospodarstva, temelječega na znanju, kjer bodo informacije in dejavnosti razvoja in raziskav, predstavitvene dejavnosti in trženje usklajevani na ravni EU.
This is the first field of the knowledge-based economy where information and activities on R&D, demonstration and commercialisation will be co-ordinated at an EU level.
Uspešnost usklajevanja je v osnovi odvisna od razvoja skupnega energetskega trga EU in njene skupne energetske politike.
The success of this co-ordination is fundamentally linked with the development of a common EU energy market and a common EU energy policy.
Nadvse pomembno je, da bodo nove pobude v sklopu načrta SET zmanjšale drobljenje, ne pa ga povečale.
It is vital that the new initiatives to be launched by the SET Plan reduce, rather than add to, the scope for fragmentation.
Te nove pobude, kot so npr. evropske industrijske pobude, bi morale vzpostaviti čim tesnejše vezi z obstoječimi pobudami (npr. sedmim okvirnim programom) ter se izogniti podvajanju ali ponavljanju.
As far as possible these new initiatives, such as the European Industrial Initiatives, should build close links with existing ones (e.g. in FP7) and avoid duplication or replication.
Zelo pomembno je tudi, da načrt SET krepi sodelovanje s tretjimi državami in ne le med državami članicami.
It is also vital that the SET Plan enhances co-operation with 3rd countries and not just simply between Member States.
Podnebne spremembe so svetovno vprašanje in Evropi lahko koristi, če se vključi v resna raziskovalna prizadevanja, ki potekajo v drugih državah, tudi v ZDA.
Climate change is a global issue, and Europe can benefit by linking with the significant research efforts being undertaken in other countries, including in the US.
Poleg tega bo treba tehnologije, če naj bi rešili problem podnebnih sprememb, širiti tja, kjer bo njihov vpliv stroškovno najučinkovitejši – zajem in shranjevanje ogljika bi, na primer, prišla v poštev na Kitajskem in v Indiji.
Moreover, if global climate change is to be tackled, technologies will need to be deployed where they can have the most cost-effective impact - for example, CCS may need to be deployed in China and India.
Potreba po razvoju vseevropskega energetskega omrežja je jasna in očitna ter ne zahteva nikakršne nadaljnje razprave.
The need for the development of Trans European energy networks is clear and obvious, and does not need further discussion.
Skrbno je treba preučiti tehnološke prednostne naloge
It is necessary to consider technology priorities carefully
Pri opredelitvi svojih tehnoloških prednostnih nalog v zvezi z načrtom SET in evropskimi industrijskimi pobudami je Komisija utemeljeno preučila strateški program, določen v evropskih tehnoloških platformah.
In identify its technology priorities for the SET Plan and for the European Industrial Initiatives, the Commission has considered, rightly, the strategic agenda set out under the European Technology Platforms.
Poročevalec v splošnem podpira izbiro tehnoloških prednostnih nalog.
Broadly the Rapporteur supports the choice of technology priorities.
Vendar obstaja nekaj ključnih področij, ki bi jim načrt SET moral nameniti večji poudarek:
However, there are some key areas where the SET Plan should give greater emphasis:
· Prvič, veliko pripomb je bilo namenjenih dejstvu, da se premalo razpravlja o učinkovitosti pridobivanja energije, skupaj s ko- in poligeneracijo, prihranki pri končni rabi energije in energetsko učinkovitostjo v industriji.
· Firstly, the lack of focus on energy generation efficiency, together with co- and poly generation, end use energy saving and industrial energy efficiency has been the subject of much comment.
Zdi se nenavadno, da to področje s stroškovno najučinkovitejšim potencialom ni bilo vključeno v seznam evropskih industrijskih pobud.
It seems odd that the area with the most cost effective potential has not been included amongst the list of European Industrial Initiatives.
· Drugič, povezava med načrtom SET in pomembno zavezo EU, da začne izvajati 12 vodilnih predstavitvenih projektov za zajem in shranjevanje ogljika, je nejasna.
· Secondly, the link between the SET Plan and the important EU commitment to undertake 12 flagship CCS demonstration projects is unclear.
Zajem in shranjevanje ogljika sta potencialno kritična za svetovne podnebne spremembe in tudi za izkoriščanje domačih energetskih virov EU.
CCS is potentially critical both for global climate change and for the exploitation of the EU's indigenous energy resources.
Omogočanje teh predstavitvenih projektov je zato nadvse nujno.
Facilitating these demonstration projects is therefore a matter of extreme urgency.
Zdi se logično, da bi bili ti predstavitveni projekti deležni posebne pozornosti v evropski industrijski pobudi, še posebej pri prehodu na gospodarstvo z nizkimi emisijami ogljika pri uporabi fosilnih goriv.
Making these demonstration projects the specific focus of a European Industrial Initiative would seem logical, specifically in the transition to a low carbon economy in fossil fuel use.
· Tretjič, znotraj načrta SET bi bilo treba večji pomen pripisati sprejemanju s strani javnosti.
· Thirdly, more emphasis should be given to public acceptance within the SET Plan.
Če naj bi te tehnologije uporabili, morajo biti sprejemljive za javnost.
If technologies are to be deployed, they will need to be acceptable to the public.
To vprašanje zadeva vse ključne tehnologije dobave – še zlasti jedrsko.
This is an issue which affects all the key supply technologies - but particularly Nuclear.
Potrebo po boljšem zagotavljanju informacij in vključitvi javnosti je treba upoštevati v novi krovni usmerjevalni skupini Evropske skupnosti in Evropski zvezi organizacij za energetske raziskave ter v posameznih evropskih industrijskih pobudah.
The need for better information provision and public engagement needs to be considered both within the new overarching European Community Steering Group and European Energy Research Alliance, and within individual European Industrial Initiatives.
o evropskem strateškem načrtu za energetsko tehnologijo
on the European strategic energy technology plan
A. ker bo morala Evropska unija pred drugo polovico 21. stoletja temeljito spremeniti svoj odnos do energetskih virov, njihove razpoložljivosti in načina uporabe; ker so za uspeh te spremembe ob sprejemljivih stroških za družbo na področju novih virov energije in tehnologij potrebna zelo dosledna raziskovalna prizadevanja, naložbe in razvoj proizvodov, treba pa si je tudi prizadevati, da se nove tehnologije in priložnosti, ki jih ponujajo, približajo državljanom,
A. Whereas, by the middle of the 21st century, we will experience a fundamental change in our approach to energy, its availability and how it is used; whereas, if this change is to be effected successfully at a socially acceptable cost, dedicated research, investment and product development in the field of new energy sources and technologies are needed and an effort must also be made to make new technologies and their possibilities easier for people to grasp,
B. ker je energetska tehnologija temeljni steber evropske energetske politike in politike podnebnih sprememb ter prispeva k vzpostavitvi enotnega energetskega trga,
B. Whereas energy technology forms a fundamental pillar of Europe’s energy and climate change policies and contributes to the establishment of a common market in energy,
C. ker je izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti eden izmed stroškovno najučinkovitejših ukrepov za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov,
C. Whereas improving energy efficiency is one of the most cost-effective means of cutting greenhouse gas emissions,
D. ker lahko boljša sinergija v prihodnjih raziskavah EU na področju energetske tehnologije samo spodbudi trajnostno gospodarsko rast, prispeva k primerjalnim prednostim evropskega gospodarstva, izboljša zaposlovanje ter tako pripomore k uresničitvi ciljev lizbonske strategije in boju proti podnebnim spremembam,
D. Whereas better synergy in future European energy technology research cannot help but stimulate sustainable economic growth, contribute to the comparative advantages of the European economy, improve employment and thus help achieve the objectives of the Lisbon strategy and combat climate change,
E. ker so javne in zasebne naložbe v razvojno-raziskovalne dejavnosti na področju energetske tehnologije bistvenega pomena; ker so se zasebna in javna sredstva, vložena v energetske raziskave v EU, izrazito znižala od zadnje naftne krize,
E. Whereas public and private investment in research and development work on energy technologies is of key importance; whereas, however, public and private finance dedicated to energy research in the EU has fallen substantially since the last oil crisis,
6. poziva k okrepljenemu prenosu tehnologije z državami v razvoju in k vzpostavitvi znanstvenega sodelovanja s temi državami za razvoj novih energetskih tehnologij;
Calls for enhanced technology transfer with the developed countries and for the establishment of scientific cooperation with those countries for the development of new energy technologies;
11. meni, da je treba finančna sredstva in človeške vire bolje uporabljati in jih v celoti povečati, da bi pospešili razvoj in uvajanje čistih tehnologij prihodnosti; meni, da bi morale države članice uskladiti prizadevanja tako, kot so to storile v odzivih na energetske krize v 80. letih;
Considers that better and greater use should be made of both financial and human resources to speed up the development and deployment of clean future technologies; takes the view that the Member States should step up their efforts to at least the same level as that of their response to the energy crises of the 1980s;
o Beli knjigi o zdravstvenih vprašanjih v zvezi s prehrano, prekomerno telesno težo in debelostjo
on the White Paper on nutrition-, overweight- and obesity-related health issues
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...22
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................26
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...26
– ob upoštevanju Bele knjige Komisije o strategiji za Evropo glede vprašanj v zvezi s prehrano, prekomerno telesno težo in debelostjo ( KOM(2007)0279 ),
– having regard to the Commission's White Paper on a Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity related health issues’ ( COM(2007)0279 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. februarja 2007 o spodbujanju zdrave prehrane in telesne dejavnosti
– having regard to its resolution of 1 February 2007 on promoting healthy diets and physical activities
UL C 250 E, 25.10.2007, str.93. ,
OJ C 250 E, 25.10.2007, p.93. ,
– ob upoštevanju drugega evropskega akcijskega načrta Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije (SZO) o politiki na področju hrane in prehranjevanja za obdobje 2007–2012, ki ga je sprejel regionalni odbor SZO za Evropo v Beogradu od 17. do 20. septembra 2007, in Evropske listine o boju proti debelosti, ki jo je sprejel regionalni urad SZO leta 2006,
– having regard to the Second World Health Organization (WHO) European Action Plan for Food and Nutrition Policy 2007-2012, adopted by the WHO Regional Committee for Europe in Belgrade, 17‑20 September 2007, and the European Charter on Counteracting Obesity, adopted by the WHO Regional Office in 2006,
– ob upoštevanju ciljev evropske ministrske konference SZO, ki je potekala v Istanbulu od 15 do 17. novembra 2006, in Evropske listine o boju proti debelosti,
– having regard to the objectives set by the WHO European Ministerial Conference held in Istanbul on 15-17 November 2006, with the European Charter on Counteracting Obesity,
– ob upoštevanju globalne strategije o prehrani, telesni dejavnosti in zdravju, ki jo je sprejela 57. generalna skupščina Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije 22. maja 2004,
– having regard to the Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health, adopted by the 57th World Health Assembly on 22 May 2004,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za zaposlovanje, socialno politiko, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov z dne 2. in 3. junija 2005 o debelosti, prehranjevanju in telesni dejavnosti,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council of 2 and 3 June 2005 concerning obesity, nutrition and physical activity ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za zaposlovanje, socialno politiko, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov z dne 5. in 6. decembra 2007 o „začetku izvajanja strategije EU o vprašanjih v zvezi s prehrano, prekomerno telesno težo in debelostjo“,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council of 5 and 6 December 2007 entitled "Putting an EU strategy on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity related Health Issues into operation",
– ob upoštevanju sklepov zasedanja regionalnega urada SZO v Kopenhagnu leta 2006 na temo Telesna dejavnost in zdravje v Evropi: dokazi za ukrepanje,
– having regard to the conclusions of the WHO Regional Office meeting in Copenhagen 2006 about ‘Physical activity and health in Europe: evidence for action’,
– ob upoštevanju Bele knjige Komisije o športu ( KOM(2007)0391 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s White Paper on sport ( COM(2007)0391 ),
– ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije „Za novo kulturo mobilnosti v mestih“ ( KOM(2007)0551 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Green Paper entitled "Towards a new culture for urban mobility" ( COM(2007)0551 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov (A6-0000/2008),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (A6‑0000/2008),
A. ker prekomerna telesna teža in debelost ter s prehrano povezane bolezni dosegajo epidemične razsežnosti in spadajo med glavne vzroke smrtnosti in bolezni v Evropi,
A. whereas overweight and obesity and diet-related disease are becoming growing epidemics and are major contributors to the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in Europe,
B. ker je znanstveno dokazano, da je učinek in stopnja nevarnosti bolezni, vezanih na prehranjevanje, različna pri moških in ženskah,
B. whereas it is scientifically proven that the incidence rate and the gravity of the nutrition-related diseases affect men and women differently,
C. ker ima po podatkih Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije več kot 50 % odraslega prebivalstva v Evropi prekomerno telesno težo ali je debelih,
C. whereas, according to the WHO, more than 50% of the European adult population are overweight or obese,
D. ker je debelih več kot 5 milijonov otrok in jih ima prekomerno telesno težo skoraj 22 milijonov, te številke pa hitro naraščajo in glede na napovedi naj bi imelo do leta 2010 vsako leto dodatnih 1,3 milijona otrok prekomerno telesno težo ali naj bi postalo predebelih,
D. whereas more than 5 million children are obese and almost 22 million are overweight and these figures are rising rapidly, so that by 2010 a further 1,3 million children per year are predicted to become overweight or obese,
E. ker države EU za bolezni, ki jih lahko povežemo z debelostjo, vsako leto porabijo do 7 % svojih proračunskih sredstev za zdravstvo,
E. whereas up to 7% of national health budgets in the EU is spent each year on diseases that can be linked to obesity,
F. ker naj bi se 6 % vladnih izdatkov za zdravstveno varstvo po vsej Evropi namenjalo za bolezni, povezane z debelostjo in prekomerno telesno težo; ker so posredni stroški, na primer zaradi zmanjšane produktivnosti in bolniških dopustov, bistveno višji;
F. whereas obesity and overweight-related diseases are thought to take up 6% of government health care expenditure throughout Europe; whereas the indirect costs of those conditions, through reduced productivity and sick leave for example, are considerably higher,
G ker je znanstveno dokazano, da je trebušna debelost eden od glavnih kazalcev številnih, s težo povezanih bolezni, kot so bolezni srca in ožilja ter sladkorna bolezen tipa 2,
G. whereas abdominal obesity is scientifically recognised as one of the main predictors of several weight-related diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes,
H ker se prehranske navade, pridobljene v otroštvu, pogosto prenesejo v odraslo dobo ter so raziskave pokazale, da je bolj verjetno, da bodo debeli otroci postali debeli odrasli,
H. whereas eating habits established in childhood often endure into adulthood and research has shown that obese children are more likely to become obese adults,