natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Uporabljati bi se morali taki postopki, ki omogočajo hiter sprejem ustreznih odločitev na podlagi strokovnega znanja in zadostnih informacij, ki jih ima na voljo pristojni organ.
The applicable procedures should ensure that an appropriate decision can be taken quickly on the basis of expertise and adequate information available to the competent authority.
Uporabljati bi se morali taki postopki, ki omogočajo hiter sprejem ustreznih odločitev na podlagi posebnega pomorskega strokovnega znanja o ravnanju pri dogodkih, kjer se lahko pričakujejo resne škodljive posledice, in zadostnih informacij, ki jih ima na voljo pristojni organ.
The applicable procedures should ensure that an appropriate decision can be taken quickly on the basis of specific maritime expertise in handling incidents where serious harmful consequences can be expected and adequate information available to the competent authority.
Predlog spremembe 6 (prva obravnava v EP).
Amendment 6 (EP, first reading).
(17b) Odsotnost finančnih jamstev ali zavarovanja države članice ne oprosti dolžnosti, da nudi pomoč ladji v stiski in da jo sprejme v pribežališče, če s tem lahko zmanjša nevarnost za posadko in za okolje.
(17b) The absence of financial guarantees or insurance does not exonerate a Member State from its obligation to assist a ship in distress and to accommodate it in a place of refuge if by doing so it can reduce the risks to the crew and the environment.
Kljub temu, da lahko pristojni organi pred sprejetjem odločitve preverijo, če ladjo krije zavarovanje ali drugo finančno jamstvo, ki omogoča ustrezno nadomestilo stroškov in škode, povezanih z njenim sprejemom v pribežališče, zahteva po teh podatkih ne sme odložiti reševalne akcije.
Though the competent authorities may verify whether the ship is covered by insurance or some other financial guarantee permitting appropriate compensation for costs and damages associated with its accommodation in a place of refuge, the act of requesting this information must not delay the rescue operation.
Predlog spremembe 8 (prva obravnava v EP).
Amendment 8 (EP, first reading).
Svet je izpustil oba predloga sprememb EP in predloge Komisije, ki zadevajo finančna jamstva.
The Council has omitted both the amendments of the EP and the proposals of the Commission regarding financial guarantees.
Poročevalec jih je tukaj spet vključil.
Your rapporteur has reinstated them here.
S predlogom spremembe se poskuša poudariti, da odsotnost zavarovanja sama po sebi države ne oprosti dolžnosti, da sprejme ladjo v stiski.
The amendment seeks to emphasise that the absence of insurance does not in itself exonerate the Member State from its duty to accommodate a ship in distress.
Nezavarovano ladjo v težavah ob evropski obali, ki ji grozi katastrofa, pa je treba sprejeti kot vsako drugo ladjo.
An uninsured ship in difficulties off a European coast and threatened with disaster must be accommodated like any other ship.
Uvodna izjava 17 c (novo)
Recital 17 c (new)
(17c) Pristanišča, ki sprejmejo ladjo, ki potrebuje pomoč, morajo imeti možnost, da se zanesejo na hitro povračilo stroškov in kritja vsake škode, ki bi nastala iz te akcije.
(17c) Ports which accommodate a ship needing assistance must be able to rely on prompt reimbursement in respect of costs and any damage arising from the operation.
Zato je pomembno, da se ne izvajajo le določbe direktive 2007/.../ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne ... [o civilni odgovornosti in finančnih jamstvih lastnikov ladij ter mednarodni sklad za škodo zaradi onesnaženja z nafto], temveč, da se uporabljajo tudi Mednarodna konvencija iz leta 1996 o odgovornosti in nadomestilu škode v zvezi s prevozom nevarnih in zdravju škodljivih snovi po morju ("konvencija HNS"), Mednarodna konvencija iz leta 2001 o civilni odgovornosti za škodo, nastalo zaradi onesnaženja z gorivom iz ladijskih rezervoarjev, ("konvencija o gorivih") ter Konvencija o odstranitvi razbitin (konvencija o razbitinah) iz leta 2007.
To that end, it is important that the provisions of not only Directive 2007/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of ...[on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners] and the International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds, but also the International Convention of 1996 on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea (the ‘ HNS ’ Convention), the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001 (the Bunker Oil Convention) and the Wreck Removal Convention (the Wreck Convention) of 2007 be applied.
Zato morajo države članice te konvencije čim prej ratificirati.
Member States must therefore ratify these conventions as soon as possible.
V izjemnih primerih države članice zagotovijo nadomestilo stroškov in gospodarske škode, ki jih utrpi pristanišče zaradi sprejema ladje, predvsem če finančna jamstva lastnikov ladij in drugi obstoječi mehanizmi za nadomestilo ne krijejo omenjenih stroškov in gospodarske škode.
In exceptional cases Member States shall ensure the reimbursement of costs and economic damage suffered by a port as a result of accommodating a ship, particularly if such costs and economic damage are not covered by the financial guarantees of the shipowners and other existing compensation mechanisms.
Pristanišče, ki sprejme ladjo v stiski, lahko v skladu s konvencijo HNS (sprejeto leta1996, ratificirale so jo le 3 države članice), konvencijo o gorivih (ratificiralo jo je 12 držav članic), prihodnjo konvencijo o razbitinah ter s pomočjo mednarodnega sklada za škodo zaradi onesnaženja z nafto prejme delno nadomestilo za utrpelo škodo.
A port which accommodates a ship in distress may receive compensation for some of the damage suffered under the HNS Convention (1996, ratified by only three Member States), the Bunker Convention (ratified by 12 Member States), the IOPC Fund and the recently approved Wreck Convention.
Kljub izvajanju teh konvencij pa se določene gospodarske izgube (denimo zaradi zasedbe pristana ali omejenega dostopa do pristanišča) ne povrnejo.
Even if these conventions are applied, however, certain economic losses (resulting for example from occupation of a quay or restricted access to the port) are not recovered.
V teh primerih bi se morala vključiti zadevna država članica in dodeliti nadomestilo vsem, ki so utrpeli škodo, kasneje pa bi lahko od odgovornih iztržila povračilo tega zneska.
In such cases the Member State in question should intervene as a stop-gap to compensate those who have suffered damage and may subsequently recover the amount in question from those responsible.
(19) Države članice in Komisija so v skladu z Direktivo 2002/59/ES dosegle precejšen napredek na področju uskladitve elektronske izmenjave podatkov, zlasti v zvezi s prevozom nevarnega ali onesnaževalnega blaga.
(19) In accordance with Directive 2002/59/EC, Member States and the Commission have made substantial progress towards harmonising electronic data exchange, in particular as regards the transport of dangerous or polluting goods.
SafeSeaNet, ki se razvija od leta 2002, bi moral danes biti vzpostavljen kot referenčna mreža na ravni Skupnosti.
SafeSeaNet, in development since 2002, should now be established as the reference network at Community level.
Predlog spremembe 12 (prva obravnava v EP).
Amendment 12 (EP, first reading).
SafeSeaNet je pomemben korak naprej, vendar je bistveno zagotoviti komercialno zaupnost in usklajenost z mednarodnimi predpisi, pa tudi izogniti se pretiranim bremenom za industrijo.
SafeSeaNet is an important step forward but it is essential to ensure commercial confidentiality and conformity with international rules as well as to avoid excessive burdens for the industry.
(20) Napredek, dosežen pri novih tehnologijah in zlasti njihovih vesoljskih aplikacijah, kot so naprave za spremljanje ladij z radijskimi signali , slikovni sistemi ali globalni navigacijski satelitski sistem (GNSS) , danes omogočajo razširitev spremljanja pomorskega prometa dlje od obale in tako boljše pokrivanje evropskih voda , tudi s sistemom dolgega dometa za prepoznavanje in sledenje ladjam (LRIT) .
(20) The progress made in the new technologies and in particular in their space applications, such as beacon-based ship monitoring systems, imaging systems or Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) , now makes it possible to extend traffic monitoring further offshore and thereby to ensure better coverage of European waters , including by Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) systems.
Da bi zagotovili polno vključitev teh sredstev v sistema spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet iz Direktive 2002/59/ES, je treba pri tem zagotoviti polno sodelovanje v Skupnosti.
There will have to be full cooperation within the Community on this work if these tools are to become an integral part of the vessel traffic monitoring and information system established by Directive 2002/59/EC .
(20) Napredek, dosežen pri novih tehnologijah in zlasti v njihovih vesoljskih aplikacijah, kot so naprave za spremljanje ladij s sateliti , slikovni sistemi ali Galileo , danes omogočajo razširitev spremljanja pomorskega prometa dlje od obale in tako boljše pokrivanje evropskih voda.
(20) The progress made in the new technologies and in particular in their space applications, such as satellite-based ship monitoring systems, imaging systems or Galileo , now makes it possible to extend traffic monitoring further offshore and thereby to ensure better coverage of European waters .
Poleg tega je Mednarodna pomorska organizacija spremenila Mednarodno konvencijo za varnost in zaščito in za pomorske okoljevarstvene namene SOLAS z namenom razviti svetovni sistem dolgega dometa za prepoznavanje in sledenje ladjam (LRIT).
Furthermore, the IMO has amended the SOLAS Convention for Maritime Safety and Security and Maritime Environment Purposes with a view to developing systems for global long-range identification and tracking of ships (LRIT).
V skladu z zgradbo, ki jo je potrdila IMO, ki predvideva možnost vzpostavitve regionalnih podatkovnih centrov LRIT, in ob upoštevanju izkušenj, pridobljenih s projektom SafeSeaNet, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti evropski podatkovni center LRIT za zbiranje in upravljanje s podatki LRIT.
In accordance with the architecture approved by the IMO which provides for the possibility of setting up regional LRIT data centres and taking into account the experience gained from the SafeSeaNet project, a LRIT European Data Centre should be set up for the collection and management of LRIT information.
Za pridobivanje podatkov LRIT bodo morale biti države članice povezane z evropskim podatkovnim centrom LRIT.
In order to retrieve LRIT data, Member States will need to be connected to the LRIT European data centre .
Predlog spremembe 13 (prva obravnava v EP).
Amendment 13 (EP, first reading).
(20a) Podatki iz sistema AIS bi morali biti vključeni v sistem LRIT, da se omogoči zmanjšanje stroškov in izogne nepotrebni vgradnji opreme na ladje, ki plujejo v pomorskih območjih, katera pokrivajo spremljevalne postaje sistema AIS.
(20a) In order to enable cost saving and avoid unnecessary fitting of equipment on board ships sailing in maritime areas within the coverage of AIS monitoring stations, AIS data should be integrated into the LRIT system.
Zato bi morale države članice in Komisija prevzeti vse potrebne pobude, zlasti v okviru Mednarodne pomorske organizacije.
To this end, Member States and the Commission should take any appropriate initiatives, in particular within the IMO.
Predlog spremembe je povezan s predlogom spremembe 14 (prva obravnava v EP), vendar v večji meri upošteva dejansko stanje.
The amendment relates to amendment 14(EP, first reading), but takes more account of the actual situation.
Obvezna vgradnja sistema LRIT ni smiselna v primeru plovil, ki plujejo zgolj na območjih, v celoti pokritih s sistemom AIS.
There is no point in making the fitting of LRIT systems compulsory on vessels which navigate only within areas fully covered by the AIS.
(22a) Podatke, pridobljene na podlagi te direktive, se lahko razširi in uporabi le za preprečitev položajev, ki ogrožajo varnost človeškega življenja na morju in za zaščito morskega okolja.
(22a) Information gathered pursuant to this directive may only be disseminated and used to prevent situations which threaten the safety of human life at sea and the protection of the marine environment.
Zato je zaželeno, da Komisija v sodelovanju z Evropsko agencijo za varnost omrežij in informacij razišče možnosti za reševanje težav glede varnosti omrežij in informacij.
It is therefore desirable that the Commission, in cooperation with European Network and Information Security Agency, investigate how to tackle any network and information security problems.
Predlog spremembe 15 (prva obravnava v EP – spremenjen).
Amendment 15 (EP, first reading – modified).
Določbe glede sistemov AIS in SafeSeaNet zbujajo številna vprašanja glede zaupnosti vpletenih, ki se bojijo, da podatki, preneseni preko teh omrežij, niso dovolj zaščiteni pred komercialno zlorabo in vohunstvom.
The provisions concerning AIS and SafeSeaNet will give rise to a considerable number of confidentiality issues for those affected who fear that the information transmitted via these networks is not sufficiently protected against commercial abuse and espionage.
Poročevalec si želi, da bi Komisija dodatno preučila ta problem.
Your rapporteur wishes for the Commission to examine this problem further.
(25b) Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje te direktive, bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil.
(25b) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission.
Komisija bi morala imeti zlasti pooblastila, da glede na pridobljene izkušnje spremeni priloge I, III in IV, določi zahteve glede vgradnje opreme za sistem LRIT na ladje, ki plujejo na območjih, katera pokrivajo fiksne bazne postaje sistema AIS držav članic, določi politična pravila in načela, ki urejajo dostop do podatkov v evropskem podatkovnem centru LRIT, ter spremeni opredelitve, sklicevanja ali priloge, da jih uskladi z zakonodajo Skupnosti ali mednarodnim pravom.
In particular, the Commission should be empowered to amend Annexes I, III and IV in the light of experience gained, lay down requirements for regarding the fitting of LRIT equipment on board ships sailing within the coverage of AIS fixed-based stations of Member States lay down policy rules and principles governing access to information in the LRIT European Data Centre and amend the definitions, references or annexes so as to bring them into line with Community or international law.
Ker gre za ukrepe splošnega obsega, ki so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb direktive, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Since such measures are of a general nature amending non-essential parts of the directive they must be adopted in accordance with regulatory procedures with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Predlog spremembe 57 (prva obravnava v EP); navedba novega regulativnega postopka s pregledom.
Amendment 57 (EP, first reading); reference to new regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
(28) V skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje se države članice spodbuja, da za svoje potrebe in v interesu Skupnosti izdelajo in objavijo lastne tabele, ki naj kolikor nazorno je to mogoče prikažejo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos v nacionalno pravo.
(28) In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Community, their own tables illustrating, as far as possible, the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public.
Kot je prvotno predlagala Komisija, bi za države članice morale veljati obveznost, da pripravijo korelacijske tabele, v katerih natančno prikažejo, s katerimi določbami so posamezne zahteve iz direktive prenesene v nacionalno zakonodajo.
As originally proposed by the Commission, there should be an obligation for Members States to draw up correspondence tables, which indicate exactly by which provisions each of the requirements laid down in the Directive are transposed into national legislation.
Direktiva 2002/59/ES
Directive 2002/59/EC
(-1) Naslov se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(-1) The title is replaced by the following:
„Direktiva 2002/59/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. junija 2002 o vzpostavitvi sistema spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet ter režima civilne odgovornosti in finančnega jamstva lastnikov ladij ter o razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 93/75/EGS“
“ Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a Community vessel monitoring and info rmation system and rules governing ship owners ’ civil liability and financial guarantee and repealing Council Directive 93/75/EEC ”
Predlogi Komisije o sistemu Skupnosti za spremljanje prometa ter civilni odgovornosti lastnikov ladij predstavljajo dva elementa „tretjega paketa s področja varnosti na morju“ in oblikujejo celoto medsebojno povezanih predlogov.
The Commission proposals concerning the Community traffic-monitoring system and ship owners’ civil liability are two of the constituent parts of the ‘Third Maritime Safety Package’ and they constitute a set of interconnected proposals.
V skladu z odstavkom 2 člena 62 poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta ta predlog spremembe upošteva zlasti nov pravni položaj, ki je nastal po prvi obravnavi, in sicer zaradi sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 24. junija 2008 v zadevi C-188/07.
Pursuant to Rule 62(2) of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, the purpose of this amendment is to take into account in particular a new legal situation which has arisen since first reading – namely, the judgment issued by the European Court of Justice on 24 June 2008 in Case C-188-07.
Člen 1 – točka -2 (novo)
Article 1 – point -2 (new)
(-2) V členu 1 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(- 2 ) In Article 1, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
„Namen te direktive je v Skupnosti vzpostaviti sistem spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet z namenom izboljšanja varnosti in učinkovitosti pomorskega prometa, pristaniške in pomorske varnosti, odziva oblasti na dogodke, nesreče ali morebitne nevarne situacije na morju, vključno z iskalnimi in reševalnimi akcijami, ter prispevanja k uspešnejšem preprečevanju in odkrivanju onesnaženja z ladij.”
“ The purpose of this Directive is to establish in the Community a vessel traffic monitoring and information system with a view to enhancing the safety and efficiency of maritime traffic, port and maritime security, improving the response of authorities to incidents, accidents or potentially dangerous situations at sea, including search and rescue operations, and contributing to better prevention and detection of pollution by ships. ”
Predlog spremembe 16 (prva obravnava v EP).
Amendment 16 (EP, first reading).
Člen 1 – točka -3 (novo)
Article 1 – point -3 (new)
Člen 1 – pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(-3) V členu 1 se za prvim odstavkom doda naslednji odstavek:
(-3) In Article 1 the following subparagraph is added after the first subparagraph:
„Ta direktiva določa tudi pravila za nekatere vidike obveznosti izvajalcev v verigi pomorskega prometa glede civilne odgovornosti ter uvaja prilagojeno finančno varstvo za pomorščake v primeru razpustitve.“
“ This Directive shall also lay down rules applicable to certain aspects of the obligations on operators in the maritime-transport chain as regards civil liability and shall introduce suitable financial protection for seafarers in the event of abandonment. ”
(-1a) V členu 2 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(-1a) In Article 2, paragraph1 is replaced by the following text:
Ta direktiva se uporablja za:
This Directive shall apply:
– ladje z bruto tonažo 300 ton in več, razen , če je določeno drugače, in
– to ships of 300 gross tonnage and upwards (unless otherwise stated) and
– za pomorska območja pod jurisdikcijo držav članic v skladu z mednarodnim pravom.“
– pursuant to international law, to maritime areas under the Member States ’ jurisdiction. ”
(1a) V členu 2(2) se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
(1a) In Article 2, paragraph 2, letter (c) shall be replaced by the following:
„(c) ladijska skladišča in opremo za uporabo na ladjah.“
“ (c) ships ’ stores and equipment for use on board ships. ”
Predlog spremembe 62 (prva obravnava v EP).
Amendment 62 (EP, first reading).
Ladijski tanki do 5000 ton morajo biti prav tako vključeni v področje uporabe te direktive.
Bunker fuels up to 5000 tonnes must also be included in the scope of this Directive.
Člen 1 – točka 2 a) i a) (novo)
Article 1 – point 2 a) i a) (new)
Člen 3 – točka a – alinea (novo)
Article 3 – point a – indent (new)
(ia) za četrto alinejo se doda naslednja alineja:
(ia) the following indent is inserted after the fourth indent:
„–"konvencija iz leta 1996" pomeni besedilo, ki povzema Konvencijo iz leta 1976 o omejitvi odgovornosti za pomorske zahtevke, sprejeto v okviru Mednarodne pomorske organizacije, kakor je bila spremenjena s protokolom iz leta 1996;“
“ – ‘ 1996 Convention ’ means the summary of the 1976 Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims as adopted by the International Maritime Organisation and as amended by the 1996 protocol; ”
Člen 1 – točka 2 a) i b) (novo)
Article 1 – point 2 a) i b) (new)
(ib) V členu 3(a) se vstavi naslednja alineja:
(ib) In Article 3(a) the following inden t is inserted :
„–"resolucija IMO 930(22)" pomeni resolucijo skupščine Mednarodne pomorske organizacije in upravnega odbora Mednarodne organizacije dela z naslovom „Smernice za zagotavljanje finančnega jamstva v primeru razpustitve pomorščakov“.“
“ – ‘ IMO Resolution A 930(22) ’ means the resolution of the International Maritime Organisation ’ s Assembly and the International Labour Office ’ s Governing Body entitled ‘ Guidelines on provision of financial security in case of abandonment of seafarers ’ . ”
Člen 1 – točka 2 – točka (a) – točka (ii)
Article 1 – point 2 – point (a) – point (ii)
Člen 3 – točka (a) – alinea (novo)
Article 3 – point (a) – indent (new)
V členu 3(a) se doda naslednja nova alineja:
In Article 3(a) the following new indent is added :
„– Resolucija LEG.
“ – Resolution LEG.
3(91) pravnega odbora Mednarodne pomorske organizacije z dne 27. aprila 2007 o sprejetju smernic o pravičnem obravnavanju pomorščakov v primeru pomorskih nezgod;“
3(91) of the IMO Legal Committee of 27 April 2006 on the adoption of Guidelines on the fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident; ”
Predlog spremembe 18 (prva obravnava v EP) (posodobljen).
Amendment 18 (EP, first reading) (updated).
Vedno večja nagnjenost k obravnavanju ladijskih posadk kot zločincev ne vodi k varnosti ladij.
The growing tendency to treat ships’ crews as criminals is not conducive to ships’ safety.
Poveljniki ladij pogosto ne poiščejo pomoči, da bi se izognili aretaciji, s čimer pa utegnejo na ladji povzročiti večjo škodo in povečati tveganje pomorske nesreče.
In order to avoid arrest, ships’ masters frequently refrain from seeking assistance, possibly causing greater damage to the ship and increasing the risk of a maritime disaster.
Člen 1 – točka 2 b a) (novo)
Article 1 – point 2 b a) (new)
Člen 3 – točka k a (novo)
Article 3 – point k a (new)
(ba) doda se naslednja točka:
(ba) the following point is inserted: