natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A. ker prizadevanja Komisije in Parlamenta za določitev pravno zavezujočega okvira za evropske regulativne agencije niso obrodila sadov,
A. whereas the efforts of the Parliament and the Commission to establish a legally binding framework for the operation of the European regulatory agencies have proved fruitless,
B. ker kljub osnutku medinstitucionalnega sporazuma iz leta 2005 ni bilo mogoče opaziti znatnega napredka, saj mu je Svet nasprotoval na institucionalni in politični ravni, Komisija pa se je odločila, da predlog umakne in ga nadomesti z vabilom k sodelovanju v medinstitucionalnem dialogu, ki bo privedel do skupnega pristopa,
B. whereas the draft interinstitutional agreement of 2005 has made no substantial progress owing to the Council's institutional and political opposition, and whereas the Commission decided to withdraw the proposal for an interinstitutional agreement and to replace it with an invitation to take part in an interinstitutional dialogue, which will result in a common approach,
C. ker imajo regulativne agencije, čeprav so na prvi pogled podobne „mikroinstitucijam“, velik vpliv na evropsko upravljanje,
C. whereas, although at first sight the regulatory agencies appear to be 'micro-institutions', they nevertheless have a 'macro-impact' at the level of European governance,
D. ker je treba še opredeliti vsaj bistvene strukturne značilnosti regulativnih agencij, če naj bi bile te priznan parainstitucionalen parameter Evropske unije,
D. whereas there is still a need to define at least the fundamental structural characteristics of the regulatory agencies, in so far as they have become an accepted para-institutional component of the European Union,
E. ker Komisija predlaga ustanovitev medinstitucionalne delovne skupine, katere naloga bo opredeliti skupni okvir regulativnih agencij in pristojnosti vseh organov Evropske unije v zvezi s temi agencijami,
E. whereas the Commission proposes the setting-up of an interinstitutional working group to draw up a common framework for the regulatory agencies and to define the competence of each of the institutions of the European Union vis-à-vis those agencies,
F. ker mora Komisija izvesti horizontalno oceno regulativnih agencij do konca obdobja 2009–2010 in Parlamentu in Svetu čim prej predložiti poročilo o njenih zaključkih,
F. whereas the Commission is to carry out a horizontal evaluation of the regulatory agencies by 2009-2010 and is to submit a report on the conclusions of that evaluation as soon as possible to Parliament and the Council,
G. ker je treba pozdraviti odločitev Komisije, da ne bo predlagala ustanovitve novih agencij, dokler medinstitucionalna delovna skupina ne bo dokončala svojega dela,
G. whereas the Commission's decision not to propose setting up any new agencies until the interinstitutional working group has completed its work is to be welcomed,
ker se Komisija ne bi smela oddaljiti od smernic osnutka medinstitucionalnega sporazuma iz leta 2005 o spremembah temeljnih aktov, ki urejajo obstoječe regulativne agencije, da bi se te lahko prilagodile novemu pristopu,
H. whereas the Commission should not depart from the guiding principles of the draft interinstitutional agreement of 2005 concerning amendments to the basic instruments governing the existing regulatory agencies, so that they are consistent with the new approach,
I. ker že obstaja skupni okvir
I. whereas there is already a common regulatory framework
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 58/2003 z dne 19. decembra 2002 o statutu izvajalskih agencij, pooblaščenih za izvajanje nekaterih nalog pri upravljanju programov Skupnosti (UL L 11, 16.1.2003, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ L 11, 16.1.2003, p.
1). za izvajalske agencije, ki jim je bila zaupana naloga upravljanja programov Skupnosti za omejeno obdobje,
1). for executive agencies which are entrusted with the management of Community programmes for a specific period of time,
– izjavo o področjih, na katera mora biti osredotočena horizontalna ocena, ki jo mora Komisija zaključiti do konca leta 2009,
– a statement of the areas on which the horizontal evaluation to be carried out by the Commission by the end of 2009 is to focus,
– določitev objektivnih meril, s katerimi bo mogoče oceniti potrebo po obstoju agencij, ob upoštevanju mogočih nadomestnih rešitev,
– the setting of objective criteria for assessing the need for the agencies, taking into account possible alternative solutions,
– redno ter usklajeno in jasno oceno dela agencij in njihovih rezultatov, vključno z zunanjo oceno, zlasti prek analiz stroškov in koristi,
– an assessment, regularly and in a coordinated and coherent manner, of the work and the performance of the agencies, including an external assessment, in particular by means of cost-benefit analyses,
– oceno, ali je stroškovno učinkovitejše, če določene naloge namesto služb Komisije opravljajo agencije,
– evaluation of whether the agency option is more cost-effective than having the relevant tasks performed by the Commission departments themselves,
– oceno o izgubljenih koristi, ker so nekatere dejavnosti izvajale posebne regulativne agencije in ne službe Komisije,
– assessment of possible benefits lost through having certain activities performed by the regulatory agencies instead of by the Commission's departments,
– sprejetje ukrepov za večjo preglednost agencij, zlasti prek približevanja njihovih temeljnih strukturnih značilnosti,
– the taking of measures to increase the transparency of the agencies, in particular through approximation of their fundamental structural characteristics,
– opredelitev meja glede avtonomije agencij in nadzora, ki se nad njimi izvaja, ter zlasti opredelitev oblike in obsega dolžnosti Komisije glede dejavnosti teh agencij, seveda ob upoštevanju dejstva, da Komisija nosi le toliko odgovornosti, kolikor lahko dejansko vpliva na dejavnosti agencij,
– the setting of boundaries in relation to the independence and supervision of the agencies, particularly the nature and extent of the Commission's responsibility for their activities, taking account of the fact that the degree of accountability of the Commission cannot exceed the degree to which it exerts actual influence over the activities of the agencies as such,
– imenovanje predstavnikov v mehanizme nadzora, ki ga Svet in Komisija izvajata nad agencijami, ter razgovore s kandidati pred pristojnim odborom Parlamenta,
– appointment of representatives to the supervisory bodies for the agencies from the Council and the Commission and interviewing of candidates by the competent parliamentary committee,
– imenovanje izvršnih organov agencij, zlasti njihovih direktorjev, ter določitev vloge Parlamenta v zvezi s tem;
– appointment of the executive bodies of the agencies, in particular their director, and defining the role of Parliament in this respect,
– potreben enoten pristop agencij glede predstavitve njihovih dejavnosti med obravnavanim proračunskim letom ter predstavitve računov in poročil o proračunskem in finančnem upravljanju;
– the need for a standard approach among the agencies with regard to the presentation of their activities during the financial year in question, and of their accounts and reports on budgetary and financial management,
– enotno zahtevo za direktorje vseh agencij, da pripravijo in podpišejo izjavo o zanesljivosti, vključno s pridržki, če je to potrebno,
– a standard requirement for directors of all agencies to draw up and sign a statement of assurance, including reservations where necessary,
– usklajen model, ki bi ga uporabljale vse agencije ter vsi decentralizirani organi in ki bi jasno razlikoval med
– a harmonised model applicable to all agencies and satellite bodies clearly distinguishing between
- letnim poročilom o poslovanju, delu in dosežkih organa, ki bi bil namenjen splošni javnosti,
- an annual report intended for a general readership on the body's operations, work and achievements,
- finančnimi izkazi in poročilom o izvrševanju proračuna;
- financial statements and a report on the implementation of the budget,
- poročilom o dejavnosti v skladu s poročili o dejavnosti generalnih direktorjev Komisije;
- an activity report along the lines of the activity reports of the Directors-General of the Commission,
- izjavo o zanesljivosti, ki jo podpiše direktor organa, skupaj z vsemi pridržki ali pripombami, za katere direktor meni, da je treba nanje opozoriti organ za podelitev razrešnice;
- a declaration of assurance signed by the body's director, together with any reservations or observations which the director considers it appropriate to draw to the attention of the discharge authority,
– opredelitev načel za ugotavljanje, ali in v kolikšni meri so plačila vir financiranja za agencije.
– definition of the principles for determining whether and to what extent fees and payments should be a source of funding for agencies,
– izvajanje rednih preverjanj, ali so obstoječe agencije potrebne, in določitev meril za ugotavljanje, kdaj je regulativna agencija izpolnila svoj namen in se jo lahko razpusti;
– provision of a rolling review of the need for existing agencies, and the establishment of criteria to determine when a regulatory agency has achieved its purpose and can be wound up;
8. meni, da je treba zagotoviti preglednost regulativnih agencij, zlasti glede njihovega delovanja, zagotavljanja in dostopnosti informacij ter načrtovanja in odgovornosti njihovih ukrepov;
Is of the view that the transparency of the regulatory agencies must be ensured, in particular as regards their functioning, the disclosure and accessibility of information, and the programming and accountability of their actions;
14. bo preučil, ali odločitev Komisije, da ne podpre predlogov za ustanovitev novih regulativnih agencij, velja tudi za dva predloga, ki se še obravnavata v sektorjih energije in telekomunikacij;
Will examine whether the Commission's undertaking to defer any proposal to set up new regulatory agencies should also cover the two proposals currently in abeyance in the fields of energy and telecommunications;
– agencije Parlamentu predložijo letno poročilo,
– submission to Parliament of the annual report by the agencies themselves,
– se direktorja vsake agencije pred njegovim imenovanjem morda povabi pred pristojni odbor Parlamenta, in da
– possibly inviting the director of each agency to appear before the competent parliamentary committee during the appointment process and,
– Parlament podeli razrešnico za izvrševanje proračuna agencij, ki prejemajo finančna sredstva Skupnosti;
– Parliament granting discharge for the execution of the budgets of those agencies which receive Community funding;
Vplivi na proračun
Budgetary considerations
Uredba Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 357, 31.12.2002, str.
Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 23 December 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p.
23. podpira namen Komisije, da ne bo predlagala novih decentraliziranih agencij, dokler postopek ocenjevanja ni končan, zlasti ker bi bilo zaradi meja sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira brez temeljitega ponovnega načrtovanja trenutno izredno težko financirati nove organe Skupnosti;
Supports the Commission's intention not to propose any new decentralised agencies until the evaluation process is completed, especially against the background that margins in the current Multiannual Financial Framework would make it extremely difficult, for the time being, to finance any new Community body without serious re-programming;
Oblikovanje opredelitve agencij
Establishment of an Agencies' definition
Nove agencije – povezava med zakonodajnimi postopki in proračunskimi pristojnostmi
New agencies - Link between legislative procedures and budgetary prerogatives
28. poudarja, da je Parliament že leta 2005 pozval, da je treba, preden se predlaga ustanovitev nove agencije, opraviti analizo stroškov in koristi, ki bi se morala osredotočiti zlasti na vprašanje, ali „je agencija (vključno z morebitnimi stroški za spremljanje in usklajevanje) bolj stroškovno učinkovita, kot če bi zadevne naloge opravile same službe Komisije“, pa tudi na vprašanja, kot so mandat in delovne metode agencije ali stopnja njene neodvisnosti od Komisije, saj je to za zakonodajalca pogosto še posebej pomembno;
Recalls that as early as 2005 Parliament called for compulsory cost-benefit assessments before a new agency was proposed which should, in particular, concentrate on the question whether "the agency option (including the likely costs of monitoring and coordination) is more cost-effective than having the relevant tasks performed by the Commission departments themselves," but also on issues such as the mandate and working methods of the agency or its degree of independence from the Commission as it is often of particular interest to the legislator;
Obstoječe agencije – spremljanje
Existing agencies - Monitoring
– Ustreznost: V kolikšni meri so cilji, začrtani v ustanovitveni uredbi agencije, ustrezali ravni javne porabe, odobrene v proračunu?
– Relevance: to what extent were the objectives foreseen by the founding regulation of an agency relevant for the level of public spending authorised in the budget?
– Uspešnost: Kakšen učinek (vpliv) je imela dejavnost agencije?
– Effectiveness: what effects (impact) have been achieved by the activity of the agency?
– Učinkovitost (stroškovna učinkovitost): Kako ekonomično so se posamezni vnosi pretvorili v donose in rezultate?
– Efficiency (cost-effectiveness): how economically have the various inputs been converted into output and results?
Ali so bili (pričakovani) učinki doseženi ob sprejemljivih stroških, zlasti glede vključenega osebja in notranje organizacije?
Were the (expected) effects achieved at a reasonable cost, in particular with regard to the staff deployed and the internal organisation?
Splošni skupni okvir
General common framework
33. opozarja, da morajo biti dejavnosti agencij urejene z jasno določenimi zahtevami glede odgovornosti, v skladu z določbami finančne uredbe; poudarja obveznosti agencij v zvezi s postopkom podelitve razrešnice;
Recalls that the agencies' actions need to be governed by clear lines of accountability, in line with the provisions of the Financial Regulation; highlights the agencies' obligations concerning the discharge procedure;
36. vztraja, da mora biti postopek revizije/razrešitve v sorazmerju s celotnim proračunom agencij; zlasti ugotavlja, da se sredstva, ki so na voljo Evropskemu računskemu sodišču, niso povečala v skladu s številom agencij v zadnjih letih;
Insists that the auditing/discharge process must be proportionate to the overall budget of the agencies; notes in particular that the resources available to the European Court of Auditors have not increased in line with the number of agencies in recent years;
38. meni, da bi morale vse agencije skupaj z organizacijsko shemo predložiti pregled stalnega in začasnega osebja ter nacionalnih strokovnjakov ter navesti spremembe glede na prejšnji dve leti;
Is of the opinion that all agencies should, together with their establishment plan, give an overview of their permanent and temporary staff and national experts, as well as indicate any changes in relation to the previous two years;
Uredba Sveta (ESPJ, EGS, Euratom) št. 259/68 z dne 29. februarja 1968 o Kadrovskih predpisih za uradnike in pogojih za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti ter o posebnih ukrepih institucij, ki se začasno uporabljajo za uradnike Komisije (UL L 56, 4.3.1968, str.
Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p.
Uvodne opombe
Introductory remarks
Zadnje čase je mogoče opaziti veliko povečanje števila regulativnih agencij na evropski in nacionalni ravni.
There has been a significant increase in recent times in the number of regulatory agencies at both European and national level.
Med obema ravnema obstajajo podobnosti, pa tudi razlike.
There are similarities but also differences between the two levels of reference.
Strukturna in funkcijska raznolikost teh agencij na evropski in nacionalni ravni sproža tudi zapletena vprašanja glede regulativnih parametrov, dobrega upravljanja in institucionalnega približevanja v smislu centralizacije-decentralizacije.
The structural and operational diversity of these agencies at European and at national level raises serious questions concerning regulatory parameters, good governance and institutional relations in terms of centralisation – decentralisation.
Ena bistvenih razlik med nacionalnimi in evropskimi regulativnimi agencijami je obseg parlamentarnega nadzora: v prvem primeru je ta okrepljen, v drugem pa pomanjkljiv.
One of the fundamental differences between the national and European regulatory agencies consists in the extent of parliamentary legitimisation, which for the former is enhanced and for the latter deficient.
V Evropskem parlamentu so se večkrat pojavila institucionalna (v zvezi s tem glej mnenje pridruženih odborov, in sicer Odbora za proračun in Odbora za proračunski nadzor), finančna in postopkovna vprašanja, ki jih sproža delovanje evropskih agencij.
The European Parliament has repeatedly considered the institutional, financial (see in this respect the opinions of the associated Committees on Budgets and Budgetary Control) and procedural questions raised by the operation of the European agencies.
Po tem, ko Svet ni sprejel pravno zavezujočega akta in ko je zavrnil predlog za sprejetje medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (pismo, ki ga je 22. junija 2007 predsedujoči Svetu poslal predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta), se je Komisija odločila, da pripravi nadomestni predlog, pri čemer je uporabila svojo pravico do pobude.
Following the Council's refusal to accept a legally binding instrument and the rejection of the proposal to conclude an interinstitutional agreement (letter of 22 June 2007 from the President-in-Office of the Council to the President of the European Parliament), the Commission used its right of initiative to present an alternative proposal.
Odločila se je, da umakne osnutek medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, in namesto tega predlagala, da se vzpostavi medinstitucionalna delovna skupina, katere naloga bo opredeliti skupni okvir regulativnih agencij ter pristojnosti vseh organov Evropske unije v zvezi s temi agencijami.
Specifically, the Commission decided to withdraw the draft interinstitutional agreement, proposing instead to set up an interinstitutional working group tasked with drawing up a common framework for the regulatory agencies and defining the competence of each of the European institutions vis-à-vis those agencies.
Razvrstitev evropskih regulativnih agencij
Categorisation of the European regulatory agencies
Evropsko institucionalno okolje vključuje veliko decentraliziranih organov ali organov, ki delujejo na kvaziavtonomen način, in so opredeljeni kot „regulativne agencije“.
The European institutional landscape comprises a large number of decentralised or quasi-autonomous bodies grouped together under the heading 'regulatory agencies'.
Če povzamemo, ima 29 evropskih agencij (glej prilogo, ki vključuje natančen seznam evropskih regulativnih agencij) kljub temu, da so na prvi pogled podobne „mikroinstitucijam“, očitno velik vpliv.
The 29 European agencies (see the attached annex with the detailed list of European regulatory agencies) constitute what at first sight appear to be 'micro-institutions' but which, in essence, have an obvious 'macro-impact'.
Evropske agencije se delijo v dve kategoriji: „regulativne agencije“ in „izvajalske agencije“.
The European agencies are divided into two categories: 'regulatory' and 'executive'.
Naloga prvih je določena od primera do primera glede na njihovo pravno podlago, in sicer glede na njihov sektorski regulativni okvir (treba je omeniti, da je pravna podlaga 12 od 23 agencij, ustanovljenih s pogodbo o ES, člen 308).
The task of the former is determined on a case by case basis on their own legal basis, i.e. their own sectoral regulatory framework (it should be noted that 12 of the 23 agencies whose authority is enshrined in the EC Treaty, take Article 308 as their legal basis).
Nasprotno imajo izvajalske agencije nalogo, da prispevajo k upravljanju programov Skupnosti v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 58/2003 z dne 19. decembra 2002, torej v skladu s skupno pravno podlago.
The executive agencies are entrusted with a specific task which principally consists in assisting with the management of Community programmes pursuant to Council Regulation No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002, i.e. in accordance with a common legal basis.
Treba je obravnavati vprašanje vmesnega pregleda dela obeh kategorij agencij in njihovih rezultatov.
For both categories of agency, the question arises of the need for an interim review of their work and performance.
Koristnost ustanavljanja in delovanja regulativnih agencij je mogoče oceniti le glede na posamezen primer.
The usefulness of setting up and operating a regulatory agency can only be assessed on a case by case basis.
V zvezi z naravo pristojnosti, dodeljenih tem agencijam, njihovimi potrebami glede človeških virov in želenim obsegom pristojnosti pri sprejemanju odločitev bi morala biti izvedena ocena stroškov in koristi, zlasti zunanja ocena.
The nature of the responsibilities conferred on these agencies, their needs in terms of human resources and the extent to which it is desirable to confer decision-making powers on them should be subject to a cost-benefit analysis, including an external assessment.
Pred vsakršno razpravo o ustanovitvi novih agencij, vključno z dvema predloga, ki se še obravnavata, je treba izvesti pozitivne, izmerljive in pregledne ocene glede centraliziranega in decentraliziranega upravljanja obstoječih agencij.
Any discussion about setting up new agencies, including the two proposals currently in abeyance, presupposes positive, measurable and transparent assessment of already existing agencies in terms of administrative and financial governance.
V vsakem primeru bo do ustanovitve novih agencij časovno prišlo po koncu tekočega obdobja financiranja, kar je po letu 2013, ob upoštevanju zaključkov horizontalne ocene, izvedene v obdobju 2009–2010.
In any event, setting up new agencies should be scheduled for after the expiry of the current financial period, i.e. after 2013, taking account of the conclusions of the 2009-2010 horizontal evaluation.
Položaj evropskih regulativnih agencij v evropskem institucionalnem okolju
The position of the European regulatory agencies in the European institutional landscape
Delovanje evropskih regulativnih agencij je tesno povezano z evropskim upravljanjem na več ravneh in tudi z evropsko strategijo o boljši pripravi zakonodaje.
The operation of the European regulatory agencies is closely linked to the various levels of European governance but also the European strategy to improve legislation.
Koncept in funkcionalnost, na katerih temeljijo regulativne agencije Evropske unije, zaznamuje precejšnja raznolikost.
The conceptual approach and modus operandi of the regulatory agencies in the EU are diverse in nature.
Posledice čezmernega povečanja števila regulativnih agencij so bile brez dvoma pretirano povečanje evropskega regulativnega posredovanja, razpršitev evropskih politik in zmanjšanje njihove preglednosti ter, v širšem pomenu, težje funkcionalno usklajevanje.
The excessive increase in the number of regulatory agencies has undoubtedly resulted in inflated European regulatory intervention, the fragmentation of and a lack of transparency in European policies and, by extension, has made operational coordination more difficult.