natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 23. januarja 2006 o akcijskem načrtu Skupnosti za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010 ( COM(2006)0013 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 23 January 2006 on a Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010 ( COM(2006)0013 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. oktobra 2006 o akcijskem načrtu Skupnosti za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010
– having regard to its resolution of 12 October 2006 on a Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010
UL C 308E, 16.12.2006, str.
OJ C 308 E, 16.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. maja 2008 o novi strategiji za zdravstveno varstvo živali za Evropsko unijo (2007–2013)
– having regard to its resolution of 22 May 2008 on a new animal health strategy for the European Union 2007-2013
UL C 279E, 19.11.2009, str.
OJ C 279 E, 19.11.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. maja 2009 o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o zaščiti živali pri usmrtitvi
– having regard to its resolution of 6 May 2009 on the proposal for a Council Regulation on the protection of animals at the time of killing
UL L 303, 18.11.2009, str.
OJ L 303, 18.11.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 13 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim je treba pri oblikovanju in izvajanju politik Unije na področju kmetijstva, ribištva, prometa, notranjega trga, raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja ter vesolja v celoti upoštevati zahteve po dobrem počutju živali kot čutečih bitij, pri čemer je treba spoštovati zakonodajne ali upravne določbe in ustaljene običaje držav članic zlasti glede verskih obredov, kulturnih tradicij in regionalne dediščine,
– having regard to Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which lays down that, in formulating and implementing the Union’s agriculture, fisheries, transport, internal market, research and technological development and space policies, the Union and the Member States shall, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals, while respecting the legislative or administrative provisions and customs of the Member States relating in particular to religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 28. oktobra 2009 o možnostih označevanja dobrega počutja živali in vzpostavitvi evropske mreže referenčnih centrov za zaščito in dobro počutje živali ( COM(2009)0584 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 28 October 2009 on options for animal welfare labelling and the establishment of a European Network of Reference Centres for the protection and welfare of animals ( COM(2009)0584 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 28. oktobra 2009 o bolje delujoči verigi preskrbe s hrano v Evropi ( COM(2009)0591 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 28 October 2009, ‘A better functioning food supply chain in Europe’ ( COM(2009)0591 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0053/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7‑0053/2010 ),
A. ker so standardi zdravstvenega varstva živali bistvenega pomena za evropsko živinorejo, saj imajo vse večji vpliv na raven konkurenčnosti kmetij,
A. whereas animal health standards are of vital importance for the management of European livestock farming, as they are having an increasing impact on the level of competitiveness of farms,
B. ker je treba ob vsakem usklajevanju zaščite rejnih živali v Uniji sprejeti tudi enake predpise glede uvoza, s čimer se zagotovi ohranjanje konkurenčnosti evropskih proizvajalcev na evropskem trgu,
B. whereas any harmonisation of the protection of livestock in the Union must be accompanied by rules on imports with the same aim, in order to avoid placing European producers at a disadvantage on the European market,
C. ker bi morala vsaka dejavnost za zaščito in dobro počutje živali temeljiti na načelu, da so živali čuteča bitja, katerih posebne potrebe bi bilo treba upoštevati, in da je dobro počutje živali v 21. stoletju izraz človečnosti in izziv za evropsko civilizacijo in kulturo ter mora načelno veljati za vse živali,
C. whereas every activity to protect and ensure the well-being of animals must be based on the principle that animals are sentient beings whose specific needs must be taken into account, and whereas animal welfare in the 21st century is an expression of our humanity and a challenge to European civilisation and culture and must, as a matter of principle, apply to all animals,
D. ker mora biti cilj strategije za dobro počutje živali zagotoviti, da se višji stroški za dobro počutje živali primerno upoštevajo, ter ker lahko je ambiciozna politika za dobro počutje živali brez dialoga na evropski in svetovni ravni ter brez agresivne politike obveščanja doma in po svetu o prednostih strožjih standardov za dobro počutje živali le delno uspešna, če jo enostransko razvija le Evropska unija,
D. whereas the goal of an animal welfare strategy must be to ensure that proper account is taken of the increased costs which animal welfare generates, and whereas an ambitious animal welfare policy can only be partially successful without European and worldwide dialogue and without an aggressive policy of raising awareness and providing information inside and outside Europe about the advantages of high animal welfare standards, i.e. if it is developed unilaterally by the European Union,
E. ker je treba za nadaljnji razvoj zaščite živali v Skupnosti okrepiti prizadevanja na področju raziskav ter upoštevati zaščito živali pri vseh pomembnih presojah vpliva, kakor tudi vključiti vse interesne skupine v postopek odločanja; ker so preglednost, sprejemanje ter enotna uporaba in nadzor obstoječih predpisov na vseh ravneh predpogoj za uspešno strategijo zaščite živali v Evropi,
E. whereas, in order to further develop animal protection in the Community, it is necessary to step up research efforts and to integrate animal protection into all relevant impact assessments, as well as to involve all interest groups in the decision-making process; whereas the transparency, acceptance and uniform application of, and monitoring of compliance with, existing provisions at all levels are a prerequisite for a successful animal protection strategy in Europe,
F. ker je Evropa v zadnjih letih sprejela raznotero zakonodajo na področju dobrega počutja živali in je dosegla eno najvišjih ravni dobrega počutja živali na svetu,
F. whereas in recent years Europe has enacted a wide range of animal welfare laws and achieved one of the world’s highest levels of animal welfare,
G. ker je Parlament v svoji resoluciji leta 2006 pozval Komisijo, naj predloži poročilo o napredku pri politiki dobrega počutja živali, preden predstavi naslednji akcijski načrt, ter naj dobro počutje živali vključi v vsa področja svojega načrta za mednarodna pogajanja,
G. whereas, in its resolution of 2006, Parliament asked the Commission to submit a report on the development of animal welfare policy before it presented the next Action Plan and to include animal welfare in all fields of its international negotiation agenda,
H ker je Parlament že leta 2006 poudaril, da je treba izboljšati obveščanje državljanov o področju dobrega počutja živali in prizadevanjih naših proizvajalcev, da bi spoštovali ustrezna pravila,
H whereas, back in 2006, Parliament highlighted the need to improve information to citizens on animal welfare and on the efforts made by our producers to comply with the rules,
I. ker dobrega počutja živali ne gre zanemarjati, saj lahko predstavlja konkurenčno prednost Evropske unije, vendar samo v primeru, če Unija na odprtem trgu zagotovi, da isti pogoji glede dobrega počutja živali veljajo tudi za vse živali in meso, ki se vanjo uvozijo iz tretjih držav,
I. whereas animal welfare must not be neglected, as it may constitute a comparative advantage for the European Union, on condition, however, that the Union ensures, in an open market, that all animals and meat imported from third countries meet the same welfare requirements as apply within the Union,
J. ker si mora Unija v času ocenjevanja in pregleda akcijskega načrta Skupnosti za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010 prizadevati, da se standardi dobrega počutja živali priznajo v kmetijskem delu naslednjega sporazuma STO pred končno sklenitvijo splošnega sporazuma,
J. whereas at the time of the assessment and review of the Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010 the European Union must commit itself to securing recognition of animal welfare standards in the agricultural section of the next WTO Agreement, before the final conclusion of a general agreement,
K. ker so dobro počutje živali, njihovo zdravje in varnost proizvodov povezani, višja raven dobrega počutja živali od vzreje do zakola pa lahko pozitivno vpliva na varnost in kakovost proizvodov,
K. whereas there is a link between animal welfare, animal health and product safety, and whereas a high level of animal welfare from breeding to slaughter can improve product safety and quality,
L ker določena kategorija potrošnikov sprejema višje cene za proizvode, ki so skladni z višjimi standardi dobrega počutja živali, medtem ko velika večina potrošnikov še vedno izbira cenejše proizvode,
L whereas a certain category of consumers accepts higher prices for products meeting higher animal welfare standards, while the vast majority of consumers still choose lower-priced products,
M. ker je v omenjeni resoluciji iz leta 2006 zahteval, naj oblikovanje pravil, standardov in kazalnikov temelji na najnovejših tehnoloških in znanstvenih dosežkih, ter poudaril, da je treba upoštevati tudi ekonomske vidike, saj zlasti visok standard dobrega počutja živali evropskim kmetom nalaga operativno, finančno in upravno breme, ker nespoštovanje načela vzajemnosti ogroža pošteno konkurenco nasproti proizvajalcem, ki niso iz Skupnosti,
M. whereas in its above-mentioned resolution of 2006 the European Parliament insisted that the rules, standards and indicators adopted should be based on the latest technology and science and stressed that economic aspects must also be taken into account, since a high standard of animal welfare in particular also entailed operating, financial and administrative costs for the EU’s farmers; whereas failure to respect the principle of reciprocity poses a risk to fair competition vis-à-vis non-Community producers,
N. ker mora Evropska Unija ob pregledu tega akcijskega načrta Skupnosti za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010 in prvega premisleka o SKP za čas po letu 2013 sprejeti uravnoteženo stališče o dobrem počutju živali, ob hkratnem upoštevanju gospodarskih posledic v smislu dodatnega stroška za rejce živali ter ustrezne dohodkovne podpore s pomočjo cenovne ter tržne politike in/ali neposrednih pomoči,
N. whereas at the time of this review of the Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010 and on the eve of the first reflections on the CAP for the period after 2013, the European Union must adopt a balanced position on welfare, taking into account the economic consequences in terms of additional costs for livestock producers, linked to adequate income support for them through policy on prices and markets and/or direct aid,
O. ker je pomembno, da evropsko politiko za zaščito živali spremlja skladna trgovinska politika, ki mora temeljiti na dejstvu, da vsem prizadevanjem EU navkljub niti v okvirnem sporazuma iz julija 2004 niti v katerem koli drugem ključnem dokumentu kroga pogajanj v Dohi ni upoštevan pomen dobrega počutja živali; ker torej uvajanje nadaljnjih standardov dobrega počutja živali, ki negativno vplivajo na mednarodno konkurenčnost proizvajalcev, ne more biti uspešno, dokler glavni trgovinski partnerji v STO korenito ne spremenijo svojega odnosa,
O. whereas it is essential that European animal protection policy be accompanied by a coherent trade policy, which must be based on the fact that, in spite of the efforts of the EU, animal welfare concerns are not addressed by either the July 2004 Framework Agreement or by any other key documents of the Doha Round; whereas, therefore, until there is a fundamental change in the attitude of the main trading partners in the WTO, it is not viable to introduce further animal welfare standards which have negative effects on the international competitiveness of producers,
P. ker se dobro počutje živali ponavadi opredeljuje kot rezultat uporabe standardov in norm v zvezi z dobrim počutjem in zdravjem živali, zasnovanih tako, da izpolnjujejo inherentne potrebe vsake posamezne vrste in potrebe po dolgoročni skrbi, ker Svetovna organizacija za zdravje živali (OIE) priznava, da so med osnovnimi zahtevami za dobro počutje živali hrana in voda, možnost naravnega vedenja ter zdravstveno varstvo,
P. whereas animal welfare is commonly understood to mean the result of the application of standards and norms relating to the well-being and health of animals which are designed to meet their inherent species-specific needs and long-term welfare needs; whereas the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) recognises the following as being among the essential requirements for animal welfare: food and water, the opportunity to exhibit natural behaviour, and health care,
Q. ker je v sporočilu Komisije z naslovom „Bolje delujoča veriga preskrbe s hrano v Evropi“ z oktobra 2009 zapisano, da „v verigi preskrbe s hrano pogosto nastanejo velika neravnovesja pogajalske moči med pogodbenimi strankami“ in da ta neravnovesja „negativno vplivajo na konkurenčnost verige preskrbe s hrano, saj so lahko majhni, a učinkoviti akterji prisiljeni v delovanje z zmanjšano donosnostjo, kar omejuje njihovo sposobnost in spodbude za vlaganje v izboljšanje kakovosti proizvodov in inovativnost proizvodnih procesov“,
Q. whereas the Commission communication of October 2009 entitled ‘A better functioning food supply chain in Europe’ indicates that ‘significant imbalances in bargaining power between contracting parties are a common occurrence’ and that they ‘have a negative impact on the competitiveness of the food supply chain as smaller but efficient actors may be obliged to operate under reduced profitability, limiting their ability and incentives to invest in improved product quality and innovation of production processes’,
R. ker lahko omenjeno zvišanje stroškov privede do selitve proizvodnje na območja, na katerih je raven zaščite živali nižja,
R. whereas the aforementioned cost increases may lead to production being moved to regions with lower levels of animal protection,
1. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije, da se z večletnim akcijskim načrtom za dobro počutje živali osredotoči na nekaj osrednjih področij ter nato na teh področjih ukrepa;
Welcomes the Commission’s decision to focus, in a multiannual action plan for animal welfare, on a few essential fields of action and then take action in these fields;
5. ceni vloženi trud pri iskanju nadomestnih metod za poskuse na živalih vendar obžaluje dejstvo, da še vedno ni bilo storjeno dovolj za zagotovitev uporabe takšnih nadomestnih metod, kadar so na voljo, kot to določa pristojna zakonodaja EU;
Appreciates the work which has been done to develop alternatives to animal testing, but deplores the fact that not enough has yet been done to ensure that such alternatives are used if they are available, as required by the relevant EU legislation;
7. poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, koliko napredka je bilo doseženega v pogajanjih v okviru STO glede priznavanja tako imenovanih netrgovinskih vprašanj, kamor sodi tudi dobro počutje živali, ter v kolikšni meri se vprašanja in standardi dobrega počutja živali upoštevajo v krogu pogajanj STO v Dohi;
Calls on the Commission to outline what progress has been made in WTO negotiations towards securing acknowledgment of non-trade-related concerns, which include animal welfare, as well as the extent to which animal welfare issues and standards are being taken into account in the Doha round of WTO negotiations;
9. priznava, da je treba nadgraditi obstoječa pravila za prevoz živali v državah članicah EU ter zagotoviti njihovo izvajanje, zlasti pa se je treba posvetiti vprašanju razvoja satelitskega sistema za sledenje prevozu živali; odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v preostalem času pred iztekom akcijskega načrta izpolni svoje obveznosti na tem področju ter predstavi študijo, ki jo je zahteval Evropski parlament in je omenjena v členu 32 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2005; zahteva, naj se pred uveljavitvijo vsakih novih pravil izvede ocena ekonomskih vplivov na živinorejo, ki bi morala temeljiti na znanstveno dokazanih in objektivnih kazalnikih
Recognises that there is a need to follow up and ensure proper implementation of the existing rules on animal transport in the EU Member States, with particular reference to the issue of developing a satellite system to monitor such transport, and urges the Commission, in the time still remaining before the action plan expires, to discharge its responsibilities in this field and to present the study requested by Parliament and referred to in Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005; requests an economic impact analysis on livestock farming to be conducted before any new rules, which should be based on scientifically proven and objective indicators, are implemented;
UL L 94, 9.4.1999, str.
OJ L94, 9.4.1999, p.
13. poleg tega Komisijo odločno poziva, naj zagotovi, da se bo v državah članicah pravočasno izvajala prepoved neurejenih kletk brez gnezd za kokoši nesnice, ki začne veljati leta 2012, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj storijo vse potrebno za zagotovitev, da bo lahko sektor izpolnil te obveznosti, ter spremljajo izvajanje v državah članicah; vztraja, da morajo za jajca, uvožena v EU, veljati isti proizvodni pogoji kakor za jajca domačih proizvajalcev;
Urges the Commission likewise to ensure that the ban on systems lacking cages with nests for laying hens, which enters into force in 2012, is fully complied with, and calls on the Commission and Member States to introduce the necessary measures to make sure that the sector is able to comply with this obligation and to monitor the process of implementation in the Member States; maintains that imports of eggs into the EU must likewise comply with the production conditions imposed on European producers;
22. poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi učinke standardov za dobro počutje živali ter naj v celoti upošteva medsebojne vplive različnih dejavnikov, kot so dobro počutje živali, trajnost, zdravstveno varstvo živali, okolje, kakovost proizvodov in gospodarnost;
Calls on the Commission to demonstrate the impact of animal welfare standards and to take full account of the way different factors, such as animal welfare, sustainability, animal health, the environment, product quality and economic viability, interrelate;
24. poziva Komisijo, naj z ozirom na člen 13 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi študije vplivov in po posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi stranmi najpozneje do leta 2014 poda utemeljen predlog splošne zakonodaje EU za dobro počutje živali, ki bo na podlagi znanstvenih spoznanj in izkušenj, ki so na voljo, prispevala k enotnemu pojmovanju dobrega počutja živali, s tem povezanih stroškov in veljavnih temeljnih določb;
Calls on the Commission, in the light of Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to submit, no later than 2014 and on the basis of an impact study and after consulting stakeholders, a reasoned proposal for general animal welfare legislation for the EU, which, on the basis of the available science and proven experience, should contribute to a common understanding of the concept of animal welfare, the associated costs and the fundamental conditions applicable;
32. priporoča, naj bodo informacije na etiketi natančne in jasne ter naj opozarjajo na skladnost z visokimi standardi, ki jih EU zahteva glede dobrega počutja živali; trdi, da bi morala Komisija poskrbeti, da so državljanom na voljo potrebne informacije o evropskem sistemu za dobro počutje živali in se tako zagotovijo objektivne informacije;
Recommends that the information given on the label should be precise and direct and should make reference to compliance with the high animal welfare standards demanded by the EU; maintains that it should be the task of the Commission to provide citizens with the necessary information on the European animal welfare system, so as to ensure that they receive objective information;
Evropska mreža referenčnih centrov za dobro počutje živali
A European network of reference centres for animal welfare
37. meni, da je treba v primerni in resni obliki javnosti posredovati informacije o potrebah živali in ravnanju z njimi na podlagi znanstvenih spoznanj; meni, da bi morala evropska mreža referenčnih centrov skrbeti za izobraževanje in informiranje, saj je posredovanje znanja na podlagi standardiziranih meril kakovosti bistveno za preprečevanje skrajnih stališč;
Takes the view that, on the basis of scientific findings, the public should be provided with information about animals’ needs and the correct ways of dealing with animals and that this should be done in an appropriate, serious-minded manner; considers that a European network of centres of reference should be responsible for implementing education and information measures, since imparting knowledge on the basis of standardised quality criteria is fundamental if people are to be prevented from developing extreme views;
Boljše izvajanje obstoječe zakonodaje
Better enforcement of existing legislation
43. poudarja, da je treba na ravni Evropske unije še naprej izboljševati in krepiti konkurenčnost kmetijskega sektorja s spodbujanjem veljavnih predpisov o dobrem počutju živali in skladnosti z njimi, pa tudi v skladu z zahtevami za varstvo okolja;
Stresses that the competitiveness of the farming sector should continue to be improved and strengthened through the promotion of and compliance with the animal welfare rules in force, and also in accordance with environmental protection requirements;
46. pozdravlja bistveno zmanjšanje uporabe antibiotikov za živali v državah članicah, odkar je bila v EU prepovedana njihova uporaba za spodbujanje rasti, medtem ko so še vedno dovoljeni v ZDA in nekaterih drugih državah; pričakuje pa, da bodo Komisija in države članice odgovorno obravnavale rastoče težave z odpornostjo na antibiotike pri živalih; poziva Komisijo, naj zbira in analizira podatke o uporabi veterinarskih proizvodov, vključno z antibiotiki, da bi zagotovila učinkovito uporabo takšnih proizvodov;
Welcomes the considerable reduction in the use of antibiotics for animals in the Member States since their use as a growth promoter was banned in the EU, while still being allowed in the US and some other countries; expects, however, the Commission and the Member States to address the growing problem of antibiotic resistance in animals in a responsible way; calls on the Commission to collect and analyse data on the use of animal health products, including antibiotics, with a view to ensuring the effective use of such products;
Kazalniki in nove metode
Indicators and new techniques
49. poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi končnega poročila projekta „Animal Welfare Quality Project“ predlaga preskusno dobo za oceno počutja živali v Evropski uniji z metodami, določenimi v okviru tega projekta;
Calls on the Commission, on the basis of the final report of the Animal Welfare Quality Project, to propose a trial period for the assessment of animal welfare within the European Union using the methods developed in the Animal Welfare Quality Project;
Dobro zdravstveno varstvo živali in dobra živinoreja imata ključen pomen za našo družbo, ne le zaradi dobrega počutja živali, temveč zaradi zdravja vseh ljudi, našega gospodarstva in evropske konkurenčnosti.
Good animal health and good livestock farming are of decisive importance to our society, not only in the interests of animal welfare but for the sake of public health as a whole, our economy and Europe’s competitiveness.