natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(14) Aditive za živila bi bilo treba stalno nadzorovati ter jih po potrebi ponovno oceniti glede na spreminjajoče se pogoje uporabe in nove znanstvene informacije.
(14) Food additives should be kept under continuous observation and should be re‑evaluated whenever necessary in the light of changing conditions of use and new scientific information.
(14) Aditive za živila je treba stalno spremljati ter po potrebi ponovno oceniti glede na spremenjene pogoje uporabe in nove znanstvene podatke.
(14) Food additives should be kept under continuous observation and must be re-evaluated whenever necessary in the light of changing conditions of use and new scientific information.
Če obstajajo dokazi, da lahko posamezen aditiv povzroči neželene stranske učinke (npr. azobarvila), mora Komisija po posvetu z državami članicami nemudoma ukrepati in prepovedati to snov.
If there is evidence that a specific additive may cause undesirable side-effects (for example azo-dyes), the Commission, in consultation with the Member States, should take immediate action to ban such a substance.
Vložen je nov predlog spremembe, saj so bile znanstvene informacije univerze v Southamptonu in Evropske agencije za varnost hrane glede nevarnosti azobarvil za zdravje otrok na voljo šele po prvi obravnavi v Evropskem parlamentu.
New amendment tabled as new scientific information from Southampton University and the EFSA regarding the health risks for children with azo-dyes has emerged after EP first reading.
Člen 2 – odstavek 2 – točka b
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) snovi, ki se uporabljajo za varstvo rastlin in rastlinskih proizvodov v skladu s pravili Skupnosti o zdravstvenem varstvu rastlin;
(b) substances used for the protection of plants and plant products in accordance with Community rules relating to plant health;
(b) snovi, ki se uporabljajo za varstvo rastlin in rastlinskih proizvodov v skladu s pravili Skupnosti o zdravstvenem varstvu rastlin razen fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki se po pobiranju pridelka uporabljajo kot konzervansi ;
(b) substances used for the protection of plants and plant products in accordance with Community rules relating to plant health, with the exception of post-harvest plant protection products used as preserving agents ;
Predlog spremembe, o katerem se je Parlament dogovoril v prvi obravnavi (predlog spremembe 10).
Amendment agreed by Parliament at first reading (amendment 10).
Pesticide, kot je metilciklopropen (1-MCP), ki se po žetvi uporabljajo za konzerviranje sadja in zelenjave (zlasti jabolk), je treba vključiti v področje uporabe te uredbe.
Post-harvest pesticides like Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) used for conserving fruit and vegetables (mainly apples) shall fall within the scope of this regulation.
Člen 2 – odstavek 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Ta uredba se ne uporablja za encime za živila, ki spadajo na področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. .../...
This Regulation shall not apply to food enzymes falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No …/…
Ta uredba se ne uporablja za živilske encime, ki spadajo v področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. .../... in začne veljati od datuma začetka uporabe seznama Skupnosti za živilske encime v skladu s členom 17 te uredbe.
This Regulation shall not apply to food enzymes falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No...../... with effect from the date of application of the Community list of food enzymes in accordance with Article 17 of that Regulation.
Ta predlog upošteva dejstvo, ki ni bilo znano v času prve obravnave poročila.
This amendment takes account of a fact that was unknown at the point of the report's first reading.
Preprečevanje začasnega zmanjšanja nadzora nad trenutno nedovoljenimi encimi, ki se uporabljajo kot aditivi, je pravno obvezno.
It is legally necessary to prevent a temporary lowering of controls on currently unauthorised enzymes which have an additive function.
Brez tega predloga spremembe ne bi bila potrebna dovoljenja za te encime do sprejetja seznama Skupnosti za živilske encime.
Without this amendment such enzymes will not require authorisation until adoption of the Community list of enzymes.
Člen 6 – odstavek 1 – uvodni del
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Aditiv za živila se lahko vključi v sezname Skupnosti iz prilog II in III le, če izpolnjuje naslednje pogoje in po potrebi še druge utemeljene dejavnike:
A food additive may be included in the Community lists in Annexes II and III only if it meets the following conditions and, where relevant, other legitimate factors:
Aditiv za živila se lahko vključi v sezname Skupnosti iz prilog II in III le, če izpolnjuje naslednje pogoje in po potrebi še druge utemeljene dejavnike vključno z okoljskimi :
A food additive may be included in the Community lists in Annexes II and III only if it meets the following conditions and, where relevant, other legitimate factors, including environmental factors:
Namen predloga spremembe je olajšati usklajevanje s Svetom.
Aims to facilitate a compromise with the council.
Člen 6 – odstavek 1– točka (b)
Article 6 – paragraph 1– point (b)
(b) zanj obstaja upravičena tehnološka potreba, ki je ni mogoče doseči z drugimi ekonomsko in tehnološko izvedljivimi sredstvi, in in
(b) there is reasonable technological need that cannot be achieved by other economically and technologically practicable means; and
(b) zanj obstaja upravičena tehnološka potreba v smislu koristi potrošnika , ki je ni mogoče doseči z drugimi ekonomsko in tehnološko izvedljivimi sredstvi, in in
(b) there is reasonable technological need , in terms of benefits to the consumer, that cannot be achieved by other economically and technologically practicable means; and
Ponovi se besedilo uvodne izjave 7 iz skupnega stališča Sveta.
Repeating text from recital 7 in the Council common position.
Člen 8 – točka (b)
Article 8 – point (b)
(b) zagotovitev privlačnejše vizualne podobe živila in določitev arom, običajno povezanih z določenimi živili ;
(b) making food more visually appealing and helping to identify flavours normally associated with particular foods ;
(b) zagotovitev privlačnejše vizualne podobe živila;
(b) making food more visually appealing;
Ponovno se vloži predlog Komisije.
Reinstatement of the Commission proposal.
Člen 8 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Vendar ne sme biti nevarnosti, da bi bili potrošniki zaradi aditiva zmotno prepričani, da hrana vsebuje sestavine, ki dejansko niso prisotne.
There must, however, be no risk of the additive misleading the consumer into believing that the food contains ingredients other than those actually present.
Ponovno se vloži predlog spremembe 30 iz prve obravnave.
Reinstatement of amendment 30 from EP first reading.
Spremembe proizvodnega procesa ali vhodnih surovin pri živilskem aditivu, ki je že vključen v seznam Skupnosti
Changes in the production process or starting materials of a food additive already included in a Community list
Kadar je aditiv za živila že vključen v seznam Skupnosti in se znatno spremenijo proizvodne metode, vhodne surovine ali velikost delcev, na primer s pomočjo nanotehnologije, se aditiv za živila, pripravljen s temi novimi metodami ali surovinami, obravnava kot drug aditiv za živila, zato je, preden se da v promet, potreben nov vnos v sezname Skupnosti ali pa je treba spremeniti specifikacije.
When a food additive is already included in a Community list and there is a significant change in the production methods or the starting materials, or a change in particle size, for example through nanotechnology, the food additive prepared by those new methods or materials shall be considered as a different additive, and a new entry in the Community lists or change in the specifications shall be required before it can be placed on the market.
Namen predloga spremembe je olajšati usklajevanje s Svetom glede nanotehnologije.
Aim to faclitate a compromise with the council on nanotechnology.
Aditiv za živila, ki spada na področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003, je lahko vključen v sezname Skupnosti iz prilog II in III v skladu s to uredbo le po odobritvi v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003.
A food additive falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 may be included in the Community lists in Annexes II and III in accordance with this Regulation only when it is covered by an authorisation in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Aditiv za živila, ki spada na področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 in še ni vključen v sezname Skupnosti iz prilog II in III k tej uredbi, se lahko vključi v te sezname v skladu s to uredbo , samo če je bil odobren v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
A food additive falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and not already included in the Community lists in Annexes II and III to this Regulation may be included in those lists in accordance with this Regulation only if it is covered by an authorisation in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Ponovno se vloži predlog spremembe 63 iz prve obravnave.
Reintroduces amendment 63 from the first reading.
Vsak gensko spremenjen proizvod, ki se uporablja za proizvodnjo aditivov, ki je bil že odobren in vključen na seznam odobrenih aditivov, je treba odobriti tudi v skladu z Uredbo št. 1829/2003.
Any GM product used for the production of additives already approved and included in the list of approved additives must also be approved in accordance with Regulation 1829/2003.
Člen 22 – odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Oznaka „živilo, ki vsebuje azobarvila“, vsebuje opozorilo „azobarvila lahko pri otrocih sprožijo alergijsko reakcijo ali hiperaktivnost“.
The labelling of food additives containing azo-dyes shall display the warning "azo-dyes may provoke allergenic effects and hyperactivity in children".
Vloži se nov predlog spremembe o označevanju zaradi dognanj študij univerze v Southamptonu in Evropske agencije za varnost hrane, ki dokazujejo tveganje za zdravje otrok, izpostavljenih azobarvilom.
New amendment on labelling since studies from Southampton University and also the EFSA have shown risks for children's health when they are exposed to azo-dyes.
Okvirna uredba o aditivih za živila je del svežnja pravil o sredstvih za izboljšanje živi, ki ga je Komisija predlagala julija 2006.
The draft regulation on food additives is part of the Food Improvement Agents Package (FIA) which was proposed by the Commission in July 2006.
Zajema predlog skupnega postopka odobritve za aditive za živila, živilske encime in arome za živila, uredbo o aditivih za živila, uredbo o živilskih encimih in uredbo o aromah za živila.
It includes a proposal for a Common Authorisation Procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings, a regulation on food additives, a regulation on food enzymes and a regulation on food flavourings.
Evropski parlament je svoje mnenje v prvi obravnavi sprejel na plenarnem zasedanju 10. julija 2007.
The adoption of the European Parliament's first reading took place during the plenary session on 10 July 2007.
Parlament je v prvi obravnavi podprl poročevalko, ki se zavzema za večjo preglednost pri postopku za odobritev aditivov za živila in za okrepljeno varstvo potrošnikov, zlasti tistih, ki ne prenesejo določenih snovi.
At first reading Parliament supported the rapporteur in striving for greater transparency in the process of approving food additives, as well as strengthening consumer protection and, in particular, the protection of those consumers who are intolerant to certain substances.
Parlament je pozdravil tudi zamisel poročevalke, da se pri odobritvi uporabe določenega aditiva kot pomemben dejavnik upošteva tudi varstvo okolja.
The Parliament also supported the rapporteur in ensuring that environmental protection is one of several factors to be taken into consideration when giving approval to the use of an additive.
Poročevalka je na splošno zadovoljna s skupnim stališčem Sveta.
On the whole, the rapporteur is satisfied with the Council common position.
Od 59 predlogov sprememb, ki jih je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi, je Svet v celoti sprejel 24 predlogov sprememb in dva delno.
Of the 59 amendments adopted by the Parliament at its first reading, 24 amendments were adopted in full and two were partly adopted.
Poročevalka je zlasti vesela, da je Svet sprejel zamisel, da se pojasni pomen zavajanja potrošnikov in da se pri odobritvi uporabe določenega aditiva upošteva tudi varstvo okolja.
In particular, she is pleased to see that the Council has taken on board the idea of clarifying what misleading the consumer entails as well as including environmental protection as a factor to be taken into consideration when approving the use of an additive.
Okrepljeno varstvo potrošnikov in okolja ter poenostavljeni pogoji odobritve aditivov sta prav tako cilja predlogov sprememb, ki so bili vloženi v drugo obravnavo.
The amendments tabled for the second reading, aim at strengthening those very same elements in the text; further strengthening consumer and environmental protection as well as clarifying the conditions for approval of additives.
o načrtu prihodkov in odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2009
on Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2009
–...Predlog načrta prihodkov odhodkov.....................................
–...Draft estimates......................................................................
Del 2 – A6‑0181/2008
Part 2 – A6‑0181/2008
9). , zlasti člena 31,
9). , and particularly Article 31,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. aprila 2008 o smernicah za proračunski postopek za leto 2009 – oddelki I, II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII in IX,
– having regard to its resolution of 10 April 2008 on the guidelines for the 2009 budget procedure – Sections I, II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII and IX
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2008)0115 .
Texts adopted , P6_TA(2008)0115 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila generalnega sekretarja predsedstvu o pripravi predhodnega predloga načrta prihodkov in odhodkov Parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2009,
– having regard to the Secretary-General's report to the Bureau on drawing up Parliament's preliminary draft estimates for the financial year 2009,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga načrta odhodkov, ki ga je pripravilo predsedstvo dne 21. aprila 2008 v skladu s členom 22(6) in členom 73 Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta,
– having regard to the preliminary draft estimates drawn up by the Bureau on 21 April 2008 pursuant to Rules 22(6) and 73 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6-0181/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0181/2008 ),
A. ker je bil sprejet dogovor o poskusnem procesu, po katerem bo v celotnem proračunskem postopku za leto 2009 uporabljeno okrepljeno sodelovanje med predsedstvom in Odborom za proračun ter zgodnje sodelovanje v vseh zadevah s proračunskimi posledicami,
A. whereas a pilot process was agreed in which enhanced cooperation between the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets, and early mutual cooperation on all items with significant budgetary implications, would be applied throughout the 2009 procedure,
B. ker bodo pristojnosti plenarnega zasedanja pri sprejemu proračuna v skladu z določbami Pogodbe in poslovnika Parlamenta v celoti ohranjene,
B. whereas the prerogatives of the plenary in adopting the budget will be fully maintained in accordance with the Treaty provisions and the Rules of Procedure,
C. ker je 16. aprila 2008 potekalo predhodno usklajevalno srečanje delegacij predsedstva in Odbora za proračun, na katerem so bila obravnavana številna bistvena vprašanja,
C. whereas a pre-conciliation meeting between delegations of the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets took place on 16 April 2008 during which a number of key issues were discussed between the two delegations,
– izzivi, povezani z začetkom veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe,
- Challenges related to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty,
3. ugotavlja, da skupni proračun za leto 2009, kot je predlagalo predsedstvo, ne bo presegel običajnega deleža, ki znaša 20 % razdelka 5 (upravni odhodki) večletnega finančnega okvira;
Notes that the overall level of the budget 2009, as suggested by the Bureau, will stay below the traditional voluntary share of 20% of heading 5 (administrative expenditure) of the multi-annual financial framework;
5. poudarja, da je sodelovanje predsedstva in Odbora za proračun pri iskanju takšnih dodatnih pojasnil nov, pozitiven premik; opozarja, da se mora Odbor za proračun vnaprej in pravočasno posvetovati o zadevah s pomembnimi finančnimi posledicami;
Emphasises that the cooperation between its Bureau and Committee on Budgets in jointly seeking such additional clarifications constitutes a new and positive development; underlines the importance of ex-ante and timely consultation of the Committee on Budgets on issues with important financial implications;
7. poudarja, da bo nova lizbonska pogodba prinesla izzive tudi političnim skupinam; priznava, da bodo politične skupine v sklopu okrepitve osrednjih dejavnosti uprave Parlamenta prav tako potrebovale delovne okrepitve, vendar ne v škodo proračunske varčnosti;
Underlines the fact that the new Lisbon Treaty also provides a challenge for political groups; acknowledges that, in line with the reinforcement of the core activities of parliamentary administration, political groups will also need strengthening in terms of staff, while observing budgetary prudence;
11. potrjuje, da namerava še naprej financirati prednostne naloge, opredeljene v proračunu za leto 2008, zlasti izboljšati storitve za poslance, kar zadeva tolmačenje in analitsko službo v knjižnici;
Confirms its intention to continue the financing of priorities established in the 2008 budget, notably to improve services to Members in connection with interpretation and with the analytical service of the library;
14. pričakuje predlog za sistem upravljanja znanja, ki naj bi bil predsedstvu predložen v prihodnjih tednih; znova potrjuje svojo namero, da bo to zadevo pozorno spremljal, in znova priporoča predsedstvu, naj v prvi polovici julija 2008 sprejme potrebne odločitve;
Looks forward to the proposal on a Knowledge Management System that should be presented to the Bureau within the next few weeks; reaffirms its intention to follow this issue closely and its recommendation to the Bureau to take the necessary decisions before the middle of July 2008;
Načrt prihodkov in odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2009
Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2009
o tem, kakšno prihodnost prinaša mladim kmetovalcem sedanja reforma SKP
on the future for young farmers under the ongoing reform of the CAP
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. januarja 2001 o položaju in pričakovanjih mladih kmetovalcev v Evropski uniji
– having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2001 on the situation and perspectives of young farmers in the European Union
UL L 277, 21.10.2005, str.
OJ C L 277, 21.10.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju lizbonske strategije, po kateri naj bi imela Evropa najbolj konkurenčno in najbolj dinamično na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu do leta 2010,
– having regard to the Lisbon Strategy, which is intended to make Europe the most competitive and the most dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world by 2010,
– ob upoštevanju rezultatov javne predstavitve z dne 26. februarja 2008,
– having regard to the outcome of the public hearing it held on 26 February 2008,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0182/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0182/2008 ),
A. ker göteborška strategija postavlja cilje o konkurenčnosti in trajnosti evropskega gospodarstva in ker imajo lahko mladi kmetovalci bistveno vlogo pri teh ciljih,
A. whereas the Gothenburg Strategy establishes priorities regarding the competitiveness and sustainability of the European economy, and young farmers can play an essential role in achieving those objectives,
B. ker bi lahko bil večnamenski model evropskega kmetijstva zaradi številčnosti kmetij vodilo za trajnostni razvoj podeželja,
B. whereas the multifunctional model of European agriculture can be a vector for sustainable development in rural areas, thanks to the widespread presence of farm holdings,
C. ker so se z razvojem reforme skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) vrsti vidikov, povezanih z zagonom dejavnosti mladih kmetovalcev in razvojem njihovih kmetijskih dejavnosti, pridružili novi vidiki, ki pa niso porazdeljeni enakomerno po Evropi, kar ovira strateški pristop Skupnosti,
C. whereas progress with the CAP reform has opened up new opportunities for young people with regard to many aspects of the process of setting up in farming and developing holdings, but those opportunities are not spread evenly across Europe, making a Community strategic approach difficult,
D. ker je po podatkih Eurostata za leto 2003 le 7 % kmetovalcev v Evropski uniji mlajših od 35 let, in ta odstotek pada, medtem ko bo morala prihodnja proizvodnja hrane naraščati, obžaluje, da celostni in posodobljeni statistični podatki o številu mladih kmetovalcev in njihovem statusu v evropskem kmetijstvu niso na voljo,
D. whereas, according to Eurostat data from 2003, the percentage of farmers in the European Union aged under 35 is only 7% and falling, while in future food production will have to continue to rise; deploring the lack of complete and recent statistics on the number of young farmers and their position in European agriculture,
E. ker je prihodnja revizija skupne kmetijske politike (redni pregled) priložnost za izboljšanje posredovanja nepogrešljive podpore mladim kmetovalcem,
E. whereas the forthcoming review of the common agricultural policy (CAP) ('health check') is an opportunity to improve the channelling of support for young farmers which should not be missed,
F. ker morajo mladi kmetovalci ob izzivih varnosti oskrbe s hrano EU, rasti in zaposlenosti na podeželju po vsej Evropi ter trajnostnem dolgoročnem upravljanju podeželja, delati na uspešnih kmetijah in v prijetnem okolju,
F. whereas, with a view to meeting the challenges of EU food and energy security, growth and employment in all rural areas in Europe and sustainable long-term management of rural areas, young farmers need to be set up on viable holdings in a liveable environment,
G. ker je potreben večnamenski pristop in zlasti trdna politika podpore mladim kmetovalcem,
G. whereas a multifunctional approach is required and, in particular, there should be a firm policy of support for young farmers,
H. ker je vključevanje mladih v lastništvo kmetij bistvenega pomena za podeželje, saj tamkajšnje družbeno in gospodarsko tkivo v večini primerov temelji na kmetijstvu,
H. whereas including young people in the ownership of farms is of vital importance for rural areas, since in most rural areas economic activity and the social fabric are still underpinned by agriculture,
I. ker je evropska strategija za spodbujanje poslovnega izobraževanja mladih kmetovalcev nujna,
I. whereas a European strategy to promote business training for young farmers appears imperative,
J. ker se opaža močna dinamika pri sprejemanju odločitev, o čemer pričajo mladi kmetovalci, njihov občutek za tveganje, sposobnost pri iskanju sinergij z dopolnjevanjem, ter pri izvajanju načrtovanja z visoko stopnjo novosti, ki presegajo običajno kmetovanje,
J. whereas young farmers have a highly dynamic approach to decision-making, are willing to take risks, to look for synergies and complementarity and to implement highly innovative planning options over and above normal agricultural practice,
K. ker obnova generacij med lastniki kmetij ostaja izziv za EU kljub različnim politikam, ki so naklonjene mladim kmetovalcem, in ki so dale zagon evropskemu kmetijstvu s spodbujanjem obnove generacij,
K. whereas, even though the various policies in support of young farmers are helping to breathe new life into Europe's farming sector, generation change among farm owners remains a challenge in the EU,