natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mladi iz držav Zahodnega Balkana običajno potujejo le znotraj svojih ločenih držav (včasih tudi med njimi) in skoraj nimajo možnosti, da bi vstopili v EU.
The young people in the Western Balkans usually only travel within (and sometimes between) their divided countries and are hardly ever able to enter the EU.
O Evropejcih vedo toliko kot o Američanih, predvsem zaradi interneta in televizije.
The youngsters there know as much about Europeans as they do about Americans - mostly from the internet and TV.
EU, ki naj bi postala njihova Unija, ki njihove vlade spodbuja k reformam, ki zanje želi, da bi verjeli v eno evropsko družino, ostaja nekaj abstraktnega.
The EU, which is supposed to become their Union, which pushes their administrations to reform, which wants them to believe that we are one European family, is still something abstract.
Medtem ko si Unija močno prizadeva za svobodo gibanja, opažamo, da imajo prebivalci te regije danes manj pravic do prostega potovanja kot v času nekdanje Jugoslavije.
While our Union strongly advocates the freedom of movement we observe that people in the region enjoy less rights to travel freely today then during the times of the former Yugoslavia.
Ali naše najbližje sosede, ki so prestali vojne, se borili proti revščini in si nadvse prizadevajo, da bi nam ustregli, resnično želimo pustiti pred zaprtimi vrati?
Do we really want to keep the door shut to our close neighbours to the countries, which have experienced wars and the fight against poverty and which do their best to please us?
Ne odločamo o njihovih pravicah do dela ali prebivanja, ampak o temeljni pravici bodočih državljanov EU do potovanja v Unijo.
We are not deciding about granting jobs or residential rights, we are deciding about the basic right of a future EU citizen to travel to the Union.
Strategija Unije za regijo je opredeljena v Solunski agendi, ki prebivalcem Zahodnega Balkana zagotavlja evropsko perspektivo, zlasti pa navaja liberalizacijo vizumskega režima.
The Union's strategy for the region is laid down in the Thessaloniki agenda, which guarantees European perspective to people of the Western Balkans and, in particular, mentions visa liberalisation.
Na začetku leta 2008, pet let po podpisu Solunske agende, je slovensko predsedstvo zadevo umestilo med svoje prednostne naloge, začela pa so se tudi pogajanja.
At the beginning of 2008, five years after signing the Thessaloniki agenda, the Slovenian Presidency made the issue one of its priorities and negotiations were launched.
V priloženem obrazložitvenem memorandumu Komisije so predlagane spremembe k Uredbi ES 539/2001 in opisan način izvajanja procesa.
The Commission's explanatory memorandum attached hereto proposes changes to the EC Regulation 539/2001 and describes how the process was implemented.
Glede na memorandum je vseh pet držav Zahodnega Balkana, ki se pogajajo o liberalizaciji, doseglo pomemben napredek, vendar le tri države lahko pričakujejo liberalizacijo vizumskega režima v prihodnjih mesecih.
It concludes that all five states of the Western Balkans negotiating the liberalisation have made important progress but only three of them can expect to see visa liberalisation in the coming months.
Bosna in Albanija ne izpolnjujeta vseh pogojev.
Bosnia and Albania do not qualify.
Tehnična ocena Komisije je pravilna, vendar vemo, da imajo lahko izključno tehnične odločitve zelo močan politični vpliv.
The technical judgement of the Commission is correct but we all know that purely technical decisions can have a very strong political impact.
Na žalost je v predlogu Komisije tveganje dodatnega razkola v regiji podcenjeno, ta pa ne bi škodoval le regionalnemu sodelovanju, ampak tudi državam samim: Hrvati živijo na Hrvaškem in v Bosni, Srbi v Srbiji in Bosni, Albanci pa v Albaniji, Srbiji in Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji.
Unfortunately, the Commission's proposal underestimates a risk of additional division in the region - damage not only to the regional cooperation but also to these states internally: Croats live in Croatia and Bosnia, Serbs live in Serbia and Bosnia, and Albanians live in Albania, Serbia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Z nagrajevanjem le nekaterih držav destabiliziramo regijo ter politično in etnično sestavljanko trgamo na še manjše koščke.
By prizing only some nations we destabilize the region and cut the political and ethnical puzzles in even smaller pieces.
Podpiram stališče Komisije, da ne bi smeli niti znižati dogovorjenih zahtev niti kaznovati najuspešnejših držav zaradi napak tistih, ki zaostajajo , vendar je mogoč tudi tretji pristop.
I do support the Commission's stand that we should neither lower the requirements which were agreed upon nor should we punish the best for the mistakes of those lingering behind, but there is a third approach.
Predlogi sprememb iz osnutka poročila omogočajo, da Albanija in Bosna dohitita Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Črno goro in Srbijo brez nižanja meril iz časovnih načrtov za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima.
In my draft report, I am proposing the amendments, which without lowering the benchmarks set in the roadmaps for visa liberalisation, leave a path for Albania and Bosnia to catch up with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia.
Rešitev je preprosta: oprostitev vizumske obveznosti za vsako od obeh držav začne veljati takoj, ko ta izpolni vsa merila, ki jih je določila Komisija, in sicer brez potrebe po ponovni spremembi Uredbe.
The deal is very simple: visa requirements for each of the two countries is lifted immediately after one or the other one fulfils all the benchmarks set by the Commission but without again needing to amend the Regulation.
Takšen predlog omogoča, da nobena država ne bo zaostala, hkrati pa ne bomo izgubili dodatnega časa za ponovitev zakonodajnega postopka.
With this proposal, we will not leave any state behind and will not loose additional time for repeated law-making process.
Ker bi dodaten čas močno vplival na politične odločitve v obeh državah, je vredno najti prožno zakonodajno rešitev.
As this extra time would weigh heavily politically in the two states it is worth finding a flexible legislative solution.
Državljanom obeh držav bomo poslali jasno sporočilo – čakamo vas, spodbuditi morate le svojo vlado, da si bo močno prizadevala za odpravo lastnih napak in zamud ter zagotovila enako kakovost kot sosednje države.
We will send a clear signal to the citizens of the two countries - we are waiting for you, you just must mobilize your governments to work hard so they can repair their own mistakes and delays and deliver the same quality as your neighbouring countries.
EU pa dela vse kar je v njeni moči, da bi vam pomagala na tej evropski poti, ne da bi znižala skupne standarde.
And the EU is doing its utmost to help you on that European path, without lowering the standards common to all of us.
Komisija daje prednost rešitvi, po kateri bi obe državi ostali izključeni z belega seznama, dokler ne izpolnita meril, takrat pa bi predložila nove predloge sprememb Uredbe ES 539/2001.
The Commission prefers to exclude the two countries from the white list and until they fulfil the benchmarks, at which time, a new proposal of the amendments to the EC Regulation 539/2001 would be proposed.
Takšen pristop je izrazito tehničen in ustreza zakonodajalcu, vendar pomeni zamudo pri uvrstitvi Albanije in Bosne na beli seznam (v najboljšem primeru za eno leto), medtem ko bodo državljani ostalih treh držav lahko neovirano potovali.
Such an approach is very technical and comfortable for the legislator but delays Albania's and Bosnia's white listing (in the best case for one year) during which the citizens of the other three countries will be able to travel freely.
Brez časovnega okvira vladi obeh držav nimata prave spodbude za izvajanje reform in odpravo lastnih napak.
No timeframe means weak motivation for the two governments to reform and repair their own mistakes.
Menim, da ni treba ponovno opozoriti na politične posledice tega pristopa in na psihološko škodo pri državljanih Bosne in Albanije v odnosu do evropskega povezovanja, ob čemer je treba upoštevati tudi dejstvo, da bi bil iz procesa praktično v celoti izključen le en narod, namreč Bošnjaki (muslimani iz Bosne).
I do not need to repeat the warning about the political repercussions of this approach as well as psychological damage it would cause among the citizens of Bosnia and Albania towards European integration, also taking into account that, in practice only one entire nation – the Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims) - would be left out of the process.
Naj spomnim tudi na to, da za državljane dveh držav iz te regije – Hrvaške in moje države Slovenije – ob njuni osamosvojitvi niso bili uvedeni vizumi.
We must also recall that when two states from the region - Croatia and my own country Slovenia - became independent, visas were not introduced for their citizens
Želela bi poudariti, da umestitev države na beli seznam pod določenimi pogoji ni nikakršna novost ali nenavaden predlog Parlamenta.
I would like to stress that adding a country to a white list under a certain condition is not a novelty or an extravagant proposal of the Parliament.
Pri prejšnji spremembi te uredbe
When this Regulation was amended previously
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1932/2006 z 21. decembra 2006. pred tremi leti so bile v prilogo s seznamom držav brez vizumske obveznosti pogojno dodane države, kot so Antigva, Bahami, Barbados, Mauritius, Saint Kitts in Nevis ter Sejšeli.
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1932/2006 of 21 December 2006. three years ago, countries like Antigua, Bahamas, Barbados, Mauritius, Saint Kitts and Nevis and Seychelles were conditionally added to the annex listing countries for which visas were not required.
Skrajno neprimerno bi bilo, če podobne priložnosti ne bi dobili tudi Albanija in Bosna, ki sta evropski državi in imata možnosti za članstvo v Evropski uniji.
It would be really improper not to give a similar chance to Albania and Bosnia, which are European and have a perspective of the EU membership.
Prepričana sem, da si Albanija in Bosna zaslužita konstruktivni pristop za hitro liberalizacijo vizumskega režima, zlasti ker se liberalizacija odobri šele po izpolnitvi vseh meril Komisije.
I am certain that Albania and Bosnia deserve a constructive approach for rapid visa liberalisation as well; especially when the liberalisation is granted only after all the requirements of the Commission are fulfilled.
Druga tema, ki jo obravnavam v poročilu, je vprašanje Kosova.
The second concern of my report is about Kosovo.
Kosovo je edini del Zahodnega Balkana, ki je popolnoma izključen iz procesa liberalizacije vizumskega režima, predvidena pa ni niti možnost pogovorov.
It is the only part of the Western Balkans, which is completely left out of the visa liberalisation process, not even a perspective of talks is envisaged.
To je seveda poledica razdvojenosti držav članic glede priznanja njegove neodvisnosti.
This is naturally caused by a division among the Member States towards recognizing its independence.
Četudi razumemo politično večplastnost problema, državljanov Kosova ne bi smeli pustiti ujetih v črni luknji, ki je nastala zaradi nesporazumov.
While understanding the political complexity of the problem, the people of Kosovo should not be left in a black hole created by disagreements.
To ne prejudicira statusa Kosova, spodbudilo pa bo potrebne strukturne reforme.
It will push forward the necessary structural reforms.
Mi kot Evropska unija moramo prevzeti politično odgovornost za izvedbo tega procesa.
We, the European Union, have to take our political responsibility to carry out this process.
Gre za ljudi v naši neposredni soseščini, za medčloveške odnose, za kakovost njihovega življenja, tesnejše stike in boljše gospodarsko sodelovanje.
It is about people in our direct neighbourhood, it is about people to people contact, the quality of their lives, closer contacts and better economical cooperation.
Če resnično želimo v Evropsko unijo vključiti vse države Zahodnega Balkana, mora zlasti mlada generacija imeti možnost potovanja v EU, da bi jo lahko spoznala.
If we really want to integrate all the countries of the Western Balkans in the European Union, the younger generation, in particular, has to have a chance to travel, to learn about it.
Predolgo zapiranje vrat samo krepi nacionalizem in poglablja etnične delitve, ki jih pred vojnami praktično ni bilo.
Staying behind closed doors for too long can only strengthen nationalism and deepen ethnical divisions, which, before the wars, were practically non-existent.
Evropski parlament – še zlasti Odbor za zunanje zadeve – močno podpira ukinitev vizumskega režima za države Zahodnega Balkana.
The European Parliament, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs in particular, is a strong supporter of the abolishment of the visa regime for the Western Balkan countries.
Sedanji režim je velik korak nazaj za države bivše Jugoslavije, saj so njihovi državljani v času socializma lahko brez vizumov potovali na zahod, za vizume pa morajo – paradoksalno –prositi zdaj.
The current regime is a huge step backwards for the countries of ex-Yugoslavia, whose citizens could travel without visas to the West during the socialist time, but paradoxically are required to apply for visas now.
Za številne so nedosegljive celo sosednje države, saj se zaradi strogih pogojev zavračajo njihove prošnje za vizume.
Even the neighbouring countries are inaccessible for many as their visa applications are rejected due to stringent conditions.
Takšne razmere pa so ovira in ravno ljudem, za katere bi radi videli, da bi razvijali stike s sogovorniki v EU (pripadniki civilne družbe, podjetniki in akademiki), to preprečujejo.
This situation has hampered the very people whom we would like to see developing contacts with their EU counterparts - civil society, business people, and academics - from doing so.
Še posebej med mladimi ljudmi je presenetljivo visok odstotek tistih, ki nikoli niso imeli možnosti zapustiti svojo državo in odkriti EU, kar poraja občutek izolacije in diskriminacije.
Particularly among young people, the percentage of those who have never had the opportunity to leave their own country and discover the EU is strikingly high, bringing about a sense of isolation and discrimination.
Skrajni čas je, da se to spremeni, saj poznavanje EU omogoča boljše razumevanje in tesnejše sodelovanje ter je predpogoj za oblikovanje dobrih in trajnih odnosov.
It is high time this situation changed - familiarity with the EU allows for better understanding and closer cooperation and it is a prerequisite to building good and sustainable relations.
Olajšanje potovanj je v tako v interesu držav Zahodnega Balkana kot EU.
It is in the interest of both the Western Balkan countries and of the EU to make it easier to travel.
Medtem ko omejitve škodijo običajnim ljudem, pa imajo verjetno le malo vpliva na to, da lahko nemoteno gibanje uživajo nekatere skupine, proti katerim je sistem usmerjen, kot so na primer organizirane kriminalne združbe.
While the restrictions harm ordinary people, they probably have little effect on the ability to achieve free movement of some of the groups at whom the system is targeted, such as organised criminals.
Druga sredstva lahko bistveno bolj prispevajo k boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu, nezakoniti trgovini in tihotapljenju, na primer večanje upravnih zmogljivosti, okrepljeno regionalno sodelovanje policije in sodstva pa tudi poostren nadzor na mejah in izboljšanje usposabljanja in prejemkov osebja.
Other means can contribute much more to the fight against organised crime, trafficking and smuggling e.g. capacity-building of the administrations, enhanced regional cooperation by police and judiciary as well as stepped-up border monitoring and better training and remuneration of staff.
Koraki v smeri sprejetja teh ukrepov so bili že storjeni in dali prve oprijemljive rezultate v regiji.
Steps towards these measures have already begun and have started to deliver tangible results in the region.
Odbor za zunanje zadeve je nenehno pozival k ukinitvi vizumov.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs has continuously called for the abolishment of visas.
Predlog Evropske komisije je zato dobrodošel korak v pravo smer.
The European Commission's proposal is therefore a welcome step in the right direction.
Vseeno bi bilo treba državam, ki so bile izpuščene iz okvira oprostitve vizumov, dovoliti, da se temu pridružijo takoj, ko bodo za to pripravljene.
However, the countries which have been left outside of a visa-free framework should be allowed to join it as soon as they are ready.
Ne bi smeli dopustiti možnosti, da postanejo še bolj izolirane, medtem ko njihove sosede uživajo možnost nemotenega potovanja v EU.
We should not allow the possibility that they become even more isolated, while their neighbours enjoy possibility of obstacle-free travel to the EU.
Seveda morajo biti za to pripravljene in pred sabo imajo še nekaj dela.
Naturally they have to be ready and they still have some work ahead of them.
Komisija pa bi jim morala že sedaj predstaviti to možnost, ki bi jo lahko izkoristile, takoj ko bi izpolnile pogoje iz časovnega načrta, brez odlogov, ki bi jih povzročil proces odločanja v EU.
However, the Commission should already now present them with this opportunity, from which they could benefit as soon as they have fulfilled the conditions of the road map, without the delays caused by the decision-making process in the EU.
Albanija ter Bosna in Hercegovina bi morali zato pridobiti ugodnosti brezvizumske ureditve takoj po tem, ko Komisija oceni, da sta izpolnili vsa merila, ki so določena v časovnem načrtu za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima.
Therefore, Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina should benefit from the visa-free framework immediately after the Commission has assessed that they meet all the benchmarks set in the roadmap for visa liberalisation.
Kosovo ne bi smelo biti izključeno iz procesa, pri katerem sodelujejo druge države Zahodnega Balkana, in Komisija bi morala takoj začeti dialog o vizumskem režimu in oblikovati časovni načrt za liberalizacijo tega režima.
Kosovo should not be excluded from the process enjoyed by the other Western Balkan countries, and the Commission should immediately start a visa dialogue and establish a roadmap for visa liberalisation.
(3) Kar zadeva osebe, ki prebivajo na Kosovu v skladu z RVSZN 1244/99, in osebe, katerih potrdilo o državljanstvu je bilo izdano z veljavnostjo za ozemlje Kosova v skladu z RVSZN 1244/99, bo za zbiranje njihovih vlog za potne liste in izdajanje potnih listov pristojen poseben usklajevalni urad v Beogradu.
(3) For persons residing in Kosovo under UNSCR 1244/99 and persons whose citizenship certificate has been issued for the territory of Kosovo under UNSCR 1244/99, a specific Coordination Directorate in Belgrade will be in charge of collecting their passport applications and the issuance of passports.
Vendar pa bi morali biti imetniki srbskih potnih listov, ki jih izda ta posebni usklajevalni urad (v srbščini: Koordinaciona uprava), izključeni iz brezvizumskega režima, ki bo vzpostavljen s Srbijo.
However, in view of security concerns regarding in particular the potential for illegal migration, the holders of Serbian passports issued by this specific Coordination Directorate (in Serbian : Koordinaciona uprava) should be excluded from the visa free regime for Serbia.
Vendar pa bi morali biti imetniki srbskih potnih listov, ki jih izda ta posebni usklajevalni urad (v srbščini: Koordinaciona uprava), izključeni iz brezvizumskega režima, ki bo vzpostavljen s Srbijo.
However, in view of security concerns regarding in particular the potential for illegal migration, the holders of Serbian passports issued by this specific Coordination Directorate (in Serbian : Koordinaciona uprava) should be excluded from the visa - free regime for Serbia.
Glede na to, da oblasti v Beogradu obravnavajo mejo med Srbijo in Kosovom kot upravno mejo, kar lahko negativno vpliva na učinkovitost nadzora meddržavne meje, bi morala Komisija od vlade v Beogradu zahtevati, naj na tej meji izvaja enake ukrepe in nadzor, kot jih izvaja na vseh drugih mednarodno priznanih mejah.
In view of the fact that the border between Serbia and Kosovo is regarded by the Belgrade authorities as an administrative boundary, which might negatively influence effective inter-state border controls, the Commission should request the Belgrade government to implement at that border/boundary the same measures and controls as it does with all the other internationally recognised borders.
Minister za notranje zadeve Republike Srbije in EULEX sta avgusta podpisala protokol o policijskem sodelovanju, ki ga je Komisija zahtevala kot pogoj, da se za Srbijo odpravijo vizumi za EU.
The Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia and EULEX signed in August a protocol on police cooperation which was requested by the Commission in order for Serbia to be granted the EU Visa Waiver.
Dogovor o sporazumu o carinah še ni bil dosežen.
The agreement on customs has not yet been negotiated.
Srbija bi morala na meji s Kosovom – ne glede na njegov status – uporabljati in izvajati enake standarde nadzora, kot jih običajno na drugih mednarodno priznanih mejah.
Regardless of the status of Kosovo Serbia should apply and implement to the boundary/border with Kosovo the same standard controls it does to all other internationally recognised borders.
(3a) Z namenom nadaljnjega izvajanja Solunske agende bi morala Komisija začeti dialog o vizumskem režimu s Kosovom, da bi se oblikoval časovni načrt za liberalizacijo vizumskega režima, podoben tistim za druge države Zahodnega Balkana.
(3a) With the aim of furthering the implementation of the Thessaloniki agenda, the Commission should start a visa dialogue with Kosovo so as to establish a roadmap for visa liberalisation similar to those established with other Western Balkan countries.
To ne bi smelo vplivati na pristojnost držav članic kar zadeva priznanje Kosova kot neodvisne države.
This should be without prejudice to Member States' competence as regards the recognition of Kosovo as an independent state.
(3b) Z namenom, da se okrepi tudi stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni proces, bodo potovanja brez vizumov izboljšala udeležbo na skupnem trgu, ki se postopoma vzpostavlja z Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Črno goro in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, ter bodo prispevala k trgovini, inovacijam in rasti.
(3b) With the aim also of strengthening the Stabilisation and Association Process, visa-free travel will improve participation in the common market that is gradually being established with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and will thereby contribute to trade, innovation and growth.
Trenutno sta v veljavi stabilizacijsko-pridružitvena sporazuma z Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo (začetek veljavnosti 1. maja 2004) in s Hrvaško (začetek veljavnosti 1. februarja 2005).
Stabilization and Association Agreements are currently in force: with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (entry into force on 1 May 2004) and with Croatia (entry into force on 1 February 2005).
Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum in začasni sporazum s Črno goro sta bila podpisana 15. oktobra 2007 , začasni sporazum pa je začel veljati 1 . januarja 2008.
The SAA and IA with Montenegro were signed on 15 October 2007 and the IA entered into force on 1 January 2008, the agreements with Bosnia and Herzegovina were signed on 16 June 2008 and the IA entered into force 1 July 2008.
Sporazuma z Bosno in Hercegovino sta bila podpisana 16. junija 2008 , začasni sporazum pa je začel veljati 1. julija 2008.
Agreements with Serbia are not yet signed and no interim agreement is in force.
(4) Zato je treba Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Črno goro in Srbijo [slednji morata do dneva sprejetja te uredbe izpolnjevati vsa merila] prenesti v Prilogo II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001.
(4) Therefore the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia [the latter two meeting all the benchmarks by the date of adoption of the present Regulation], should be transferred to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.