natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov in v skladu s členom 6(3) poslovnika ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti zaščiti poslančeve imunitete, Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament ne zaščiti poslanske imunitete Bruna Gollnischa.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 6(3) of the Rules of Procedure, after considering the reasons for and against defending the Member’s immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should not defend the parliamentary immunity of Bruno Gollnisch.
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Brunu Gollnischu
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Bruno Gollnisch
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Brunu Gollnischu, ki so jo 3. novembra 2010 posredovali francoski organi, na plenarnem zasedanju pa je bila razglašena 24. novembra 2010,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Bruno Gollnisch, forwarded by the French authorities on 3 November 2010 and announced in plenary sitting on 24 November 2010,
– ob upoštevanju člena 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije z dne 8. aprila 1965 in člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union of 8 April 1965 , and to Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju 26. člena ustave Republike Francije,
– having regard to Article 26 of the Constitution of the French Republic,
– ob upoštevanju členov 6(2) in 7 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0155/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0155/2011 ),
A. ker je francoski javni tožilec zahteval odvzem poslanske imunitete poslancu Evropskega parlamenta Brunu Gollnischu, da bi omogočili preiskavo v zvezi s tožbo o domnevnem spodbujanju k rasnemu sovraštvu in po potrebi sojenje Brunu Gollnischu pred francoskim sodiščem prve stopnje, višjim sodiščem in kasacijskem sodiščem,
A. whereas a French public prosecutor has requested the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Bruno Gollnisch, a Member of the European Parliament, so that a complaint alleging incitement to racial hatred can be investigated and so that, if appropriate, Bruno Gollnisch can be tried before the French Court of First Instance, the Appeal Court and the Court of Cassation,
B. ker se odvzem imunitete Brunu Gollnischu nanaša na domnevno kaznivo dejanje spodbujanja k rasnemu sovraštvu v sporočilu za javnost, ki ga je 3. oktobra 2008 objavil regionalni odbor stranke Nacionalna fronta v regiji Rhône-Alpe, Bruno Gollnisch pa je bil takrat predsednik odbora,
B. whereas the waiver of the immunity of Bruno Gollnisch relates to an alleged offence of incitement to racial hatred as a result of a press release issued on 3 October 2008 by the Rhône-Alpes Region ‘Front National’ Group, of which Bruno Gollnisch was President,
C. ker v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije med zasedanji Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države; in ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu,
C. whereas, in accordance with Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament; and whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
D. ker se v skladu s 26. členom ustave Francoske republike nobenega poslanca ne sme aretirati zaradi kaznivega dejanja ali prekrška, niti se ga ne sme pripreti ali mu kako drugače omejiti prostost brez dovoljenja skupščine, katere poslanec je, razen v primeru hudega kaznivega dejanja, zagrešenega in flagrante delicto , ali dokončne obsodbe,
D. whereas, in accordance with Article 26 of the Constitution of the French Republic, no Member of Parliament may be arrested or subject to any other measure depriving him or her of freedom or restricting that freedom as a result of criminal or minor offences without the authorisation of the Assembly to which he or she belongs, except if a serious crime has been committed, in the event of flagrante delicto or if a final judgment has been handed down,
E. ker v tem primeru Parlament ni našel dokaza, da naj bi šlo za fumus persecutionis , torej dovolj utemeljen sum, da je bil primer sprožen z namenom, da bi se poslancu politično škodovalo;
E. whereas, in the present case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis , i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the case has been brought with the intention of causing political damage to the Member,
F. ker zahteva francoskih oblasti ne zadeva politične dejavnosti Bruna Gollnischa kot poslanca Evropskega parlamenta; ker namesto tega zadeva dejavnosti Bruna Gollnischa kot člana sveta regije Rhône-Alpes, ki so povsem regionalne in lokalne narave, saj je bil v to funkcijo izvoljen na neposrednih splošnih volitvah, funkcija pa je ločena od mandata poslanca Evropskega parlamenta,
F. whereas the request from the French authorities does not relate to Bruno Gollnisch’s political activities as a Member of the European Parliament; whereas it concerns instead activities of a purely regional and local nature as a Rhône-Alpes regional councillor, a mandate to which Bruno Gollnisch was elected by direct universal suffrage and which is distinct from that of Member of the European Parliament,
G. ker je Bruno Gollnisch pojasnil, zakaj je njegova politična skupina v svetu regije Rhône-Alpes objavila sporočilo za javnost, zaradi katerega je zahteval zaščito imunitete: dejal je, da je sporočilo za javnost napisala ekipa stranke Nacionalna fronta v tej regiji, skupaj z odgovorno osebo za komunikacije, ki je bila „pooblaščena za dajanje izjav v imenu izvoljenih uradnih predstavnikov Nacionalne fronte“; ker bi uveljavljanje parlamentarne imunitete v takšnih okoliščinah pomenilo neustrezno uporabo pravil, katerih namen je preprečiti motnje v delovanju in neodvisnosti Parlamenta ,
G. whereas Bruno Gollnisch has given an explanation as to why the press release which has prompted the request for waiver of immunity was issued by his political group in the Rhône-Alpes Regional Council, stating that it had been written by the Front National team in that region, including its head of communications, who was ‘empowered to speak on behalf of the Front National’s elected officials’; whereas the application of parliamentary immunity to such a situation would constitute an undue extension of those rules, which are intended to prevent any interference with the functioning and independence of Parliament,
H. ker ni naloga Parlamenta, temveč pristojnih sodnih organov, da odločijo, ob spoštovanju vseh demokratičnih jamstev, v kolikšni meri je bila kršena francoska zakonodaja o spodbujanju k rasnemu sovraštvu in kakšne naj bodo pravne posledice,
H. whereas it is not for Parliament but for the competent judicial authorities to decide, whilst respecting all democratic guarantees, to what extent French law on incitement to racial hatred has been broken and what the judicial consequences might be,
I. ker je zato primerno, da se v tem primeru priporoči odvzem imunitete,
I. whereas it is therefore appropriate to recommend a waiver of parliamentary immunity in this instance,
Predsednik je na zasedanju 24. novembra 2010 v skladu s členom 6(2) poslovnika razglasil, da je prejel pismo francoskih organov z dne 3. novembra 2010 z zahtevo za odvzem imunitete Brunu Gollnischu.
At the sitting of 24 November 2010 the President announced, under Rule 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, that he had received a letter sent by the French authorities on 3 November 2010 requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Bruno Gollnisch.
Predsednik je zahtevo v skladu s členom 6(2) poslovnika posredoval Odboru za pravne zadeve.
The President referred the request to the Committee on Legal Affairs under Rule 6(2).
Tožilec na višjem sodišču v Lyonu zahteva od Evropskega parlamenta odvzem imunitete poslancu Brunu Gollnischu v zvezi s kazensko preiskavo, ki poteka na tem sodišču.
The Prosecutor at the Court of Appeal of Lyon is asking the European Parliament to waive the immunity of its Member, Bruno Gollnisch, in connection with a criminal investigation by that court.
Preiskava zadeva tožbo in odškodninski zahtevek ( plainte avec constitution de partie civile ), ki ju je 26. januarja 2009 proti neimenovani osebi zaradi spodbujanja k rasnemu sovraštvu vložila Mednarodna liga za boj proti rasizmu in antisemitizmu (v nadaljevanju MLRA)
The investigation concerns an action and claim for compensation ( plainte avec constitution de partie civile ) brought by the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism (hereinafter, the LICRA) on 26 January 2009 against an unnamed person for incitement to racial hatred
Sporočilo za javnost je sledilo odprtemu pismu predsednika sveta regije Rhône-Alpes Jean-Jacka Queyranna ministrici za notranje zadeve Michèle Alliot-Marie, v katerem je kritiziral anketo med nekaterimi uslužbenci v javni upravi, katere cilj je bil dognati, ali so verujoči uslužbenci, razen kristjanov, zahtevali spremembe delovnega časa ali pogojev zaposlitve, da bi lahko izražali svojo veroizpoved.
The press release followed an open letter from the President of the Rhône-Alpes Regional Council, Jean-Jack Queyranne, to Michèle Alliot-Marie, Minister of the Interior, criticising a survey among certain civil servants, the aim of which was to ascertain whether staff members of religions other than Christianity had asked for their hours of work or conditions of service to be altered to enable them to practise their religion.
Francoski organi trdijo, da je Bruno Gollnisch, ki je navajal svojo imuniteto pred pregonom kot poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, zavrnil poziv preiskovalcev in kasneje preiskovalnega sodnika, ki je želel pripraviti zapis zbranih dokazov v začetni fazi preiskave ( procès-verbal de première comparution ).
The French authorities state that Bruno Gollnisch, citing his immunity from prosecution as a Member of the European Parliament, refused to reply to the summons issued by the investigators and subsequently by the investigating magistrate, who wished to draw up a transcript of evidence in connection with the initial examination proceedings ( procès-verbal de première comparution ).
Državni tožilec zahteva odvzem poslanske imunitete Brunu Gollnischu, da bi omogočili preiskavo tožbe Mednarodne lige proti rasizmu in antisemitizmu in, če to pride v poštev, privedbo Bruna Gollnischa pred sodišče prve stopnje, višje sodišče in kasacijsko sodišče.
The Public Prosecutor is requesting the waiver of Bruno Gollnisch's parliamentary immunity to enable the complaint by the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism to be investigated and, if appropriate, to enable Bruno Gollnisch to be brought before the Court of First Instance, the Appeal Court and the Court of Cassation.
Pripor, druge oblike odvzema ali omejevanja prostosti ali kazensko preganjanje poslanca se ustavi do konca zasedanja, če skupščina, katere poslanec je, tako zahteva.
Detention, measures depriving the Member of his freedom or restricting that freedom or the prosecution of the Member of Parliament shall be suspended during the session if the Assembly of which he is a Member so demands.
Vsaka zahteva za odvzem imunitete poslancu, ki jo na predsednika naslovi pristojni organ države članice, se razglasi v Parlamentu in posreduje pristojnemu odboru. (...)
Any request addressed to the President by a competent authority of a Member State that the immunity of a Member be waived shall be announced in Parliament and referred to the committee responsible. (...)
Kar zadeva člen 9 protokola, je – glede na dejstvo, da se postopek nanaša na domnevno kaznivo dejanje, storjeno v Franciji, katere državljanstvo je imel takrat Bruno Gollnisch – veljaven le sledeči del: „ Med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države” .
Under Article 9 of the Protocol, given that the proceedings concern an offence allegedly committed in France, whose citizenship Bruno Gollnisch enjoyed at the material time, the only applicable part is the one pursuant to which ‘ during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy: a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament ’.
Ustrezen francoski zakonski predpis je 26. člen francoske ustave, zlasti njegov drugi odstavek, ki se glasi:
The applicable French law is Article 26 of the French Constitution, and in particular paragraph 2 thereof which states that:
„Nobenega poslanca se ne sme aretirat i zaradi kaznivega dejanja ali prekrška, niti se ga ne sme pripreti ali mu kako drugače omejiti prostost brez dovoljenja skupščine, katere poslanec je.
"No Member of Parliament may be arrested or subject to any other measure depriving the Member of freedom or restricting that freedom for criminal or minor offences without the authorisation of the Assembly to which he belongs, except in the case of a crime or flagrante delicto or of final sentence."
To dovoljenje ni potrebno v primeru zločina ali kaznivega dejanja, zagrešenega in flagrante delicto, ali v primeru do končne obsodbe.”
The fact that the national law in question does not set out criteria applicable to waiver of immunity does not prevent the Parliament from applying its own consistent principles in deciding whether or not to waive the immunity of a member.
Dejstvo, da zadevni nacionalni predpis ne določa meril za odvzem imunitete, Parlamentu ne preprečuje tega, da bi izvajal svoja dosledna načela o tem, kdaj naj poslancu odvzame imuniteto.
In the present case, the Committee has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis , i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the case has been brought with the intention of causing political damage to the Member.
V tem primeru odbor ni našel dokaza, da naj bi šlo za fumus persecutionis , torej dovolj resen in jasen sum, da je bil primer sprožen z namenom, da bi se poslancu politično škodovalo.
Secondly, the case does not come within the scope of Bruno Gollnisch's political activities as member of the European Parliament.
Drugič, primer ne zadeva političnih dejavnosti Bruna Gollnischa kot poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, temveč zgolj njegove regionalne in lokalne dejavnosti v vlogi člana sveta regije Rhône-Alpes; temveč zgolj regionalne in lokalne dejavnosti Bruna Gollnischa kot člana sveta regije Rhône-Alpes; na to funkcijo je bil izvoljen na neposrednih splošnih volitvah
It concerns instead activities of a purely regional and local nature of Bruno Gollnisch as regional councillor for Rhône-Alpes, a mandate to which he was elected by direct universal suffrage
Uveljavljanje parlamentarne imunitete v takšnih okoliščinah bi pomenilo neustrezno uporabo pravil, katerih namen je preprečiti vmešavanje v delovanje in neodvisnost Parlamenta .
The application of parliamentary immunity to such a situation is considered to constitute an undue extension of those rules, which are intended to avoid any interference with the functioning and independence of the Parliament .
Dodati je treba, da Evropski parlament s svojo odločitvijo o odvzemu poslančeve imunitete pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu omogoča zgolj začetek pregona – glede na to, da nista ogrožena delovanje in neodvisnost institucije – kar pa ne pomeni, da gre za kakršnokoli mnenje o poslančevi krivdi ali o tem, da je treba zadevna dejanja ali mnenja preganjati
It should be noted that by a decision to waive the immunity of a Member, the European Parliament only permits the competent national authority to start a prosecution - considering that neither the functioning nor the independence of the institution are jeopardised-, without such a measure being considered as any form of pronouncement on the Member's guilt or on whether the acts or opinions concerned justify prosecution
Sklep T‑507/10 R Uspaskich, nyr ; glej tudi člen 7(7) poslovnika. .
Order T‑507/10 R Uspaskich, nyr ; see also Article 7, paragraph 7 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure. .
Zato je ustrezno, da se v tem primeru priporoči odvzem imunitete.
It is therefore appropriate to recommend a waiver of parliamentary immunity in this instance.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov in v skladu s členom 6(2) poslovnika ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti odvzemu poslančeve imunitete Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament Brunu Gollnischu odvzame poslansko imuniteto.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after considering the reasons for and against waiving the Member’s immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should waive the parliamentary immunity of Bruno Gollnisch.
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1514/98 o dokazilu o poreklu blaga za nekatere tekstilne izdelke, iz oddelka XI kombinirane nomenklature, sproščene v prosti promet v Skupnosti, ter o pogojih za sprejem takšnega dokazila ter o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3030/93 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov po poreklu iz tretjih držav
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1541/98 on proof of origin for certain textile products falling within Section XI of the Combined Nomenclature and released for free circulation in the Community, and on the conditions for the acceptance of such proof and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3030/93 on common rules for imports of certain textile products from third countries
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0544 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0544 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 207(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7–0316/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0316/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7-0156/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A7-0156/2011 ),
Predlog Komisije o razveljaviti Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1541/98
The Commission’s proposal to repeal Council Regulation (EC) No 1541/98
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1541/98 z dne 13. julija 1998 o dokazilu o poreklu blaga za nekatere tekstilne izdelke, iz oddelka XI kombinirane nomenklature, sproščene v prosti promet v Skupnosti, ter o pogojih za sprejem takšnega dokazila. in o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3030/93
The Council Regulation (EC) No 1541/98 of 13 July 1998 on proof of origin for certain textile products falling within Section XI of the Combined Nomenclature and released for free circulation in the Community, and on the conditions for the acceptance of such proof. and to amend Council Regulation (EEC) No 3030/93
Uredba Sveta št. 3030/93 z dne 12. oktobra 1993 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov po poreklu iz tretjih držav. , kot je bil predložen Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v rednem zakonodajnem postopku, temelji na obvezi politike Evropske unije, ki si prizadeva poenostavitvi veljavno zakonodajo in tako ustvariti boljše in preglednejše razmere na področju zakonodaje za podjetja, zlasti z poenostavitvijo carinskih formalnosti, ki jih opravljajo uvozniki nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov, ki so v prostem prometu v Skupnosti in ki sodijo v Oddelek XI kombinirane nomenklature
The Council Regulation (EEC) No 3030/93 of 12 October 1993 on common rules for imports of certain textile products from third countries. , as presented to the European Parliament and the Council under ordinary legislative procedure is driven by European Union’s policy commitment to simplify the legislation in force in view of creating a better and clearer legislative environment for businesses, mainly with respect to the simplification of customs formalities carried out by importers of certain textile products released for free circulation in the Community, which fall within Section XI of the Combined Nomenclature
Kombinirana nomenklatura je skupna nomenklatura EU.
The Combined Nomenclature (CN) is the common nomenclature of the EU.
Vsebuje podnaslove, sestavljene iz osemmestne številčne oznake, ki se za označevanje različnih vrst blaga uporabljajo na izvoznih deklaracijah in statističnih deklaracijah o notranji trgovini.
It includes 8-digit sub-headings that are used in export declarations and in statistical declarations on internal trade to identify the different categories of goods.
Kombinirana nomenklatura se posodablja vsako leto, nova verzija, ki bo začela veljati na začetku naslednjega leta, pa se najkasneje do konca oktobra letno objavlja v Uradnem listu Evropske unije. in so našteti v Prilogi I k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 3030/93.
The CN is updated every year and the new version that comes into force in the beginning of the following year is published yearly in the Official Journal of the European Union, by the end of October at the latest. , listed in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3030/93.
Področje uporabe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1541/98
Scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 1541/98
Pravni instrument, ki naj bi se razveljavil, zadeva pogoje za sprejetje dokazila o poreklu nekaterega tekstila in tekstilnih izdelkov s poreklom iz tretjih držav, ki spadajo v Oddelek XI kombinirane nomenklature: svila, volna, fina ali groba živalska dlaka, preja in tkanine iz konjske žime, bombaž, druga rastlinska tekstilna vlakna, papirna preja, sintetični ali umetni filamenti, trakovi in podobno iz sintetičnih ali umetnih tekstilnih materialov, umetna in sintetična rezana vlakna, vata, polst in netkane tkanine, specialne preje, vrvi, motvozi, konopci in prameni ter proizvodi iz njih, preproge in druga tekstilna talna prekrivala, specialne tkanine, taftani tekstilni materiali, čipke, tapiserije, pozamentarija, vezenine, impregnirani, prevlečeni, prekriti ali laminirani tekstilni materiali in podobni materiali, primerni za uporabo v industriji, pleteni ali kvačkani tekstilni materiali, oblačilni izdelki in oblačilni dodatki, pleteni ali kvačkani, oblačilni izdelki in oblačilni dodatki, nepleteni ali nekvačkani, drugi gotovi tekstilni izdelki; kompleti, rabljena oblačila in rabljeni tekstilni izdelki in krpe, kot so našteti v Prilogi I k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 3030/93.
The legal instrument to be repealed concerns the conditions of acceptance of proofs of origin for certain textiles and textile articles originating in third countries, and falling within Section XI of the Combined Nomenclature: silk; wool, fine or coarse animal hair, horsehair yarn and woven fabric; cotton; other vegetable textile fibres, paper yarn; man-made filaments, strip and the like of man-made textile materials; man-made staple fibres; wadding, felt and non woven, special yarns, twine, cordage, ropes and cables and articles thereof; carpets and other textile floor coverings; special woven fabrics, tufted textile fabrics, lace, tapes tries, trimmings, embroidery; impregnated, coated, covered or laminated textile fabrics, and textile articles of a kind suitable for industrial use; knitted or crocheted fabrics; articles of apparel and clothing accessories, knitted or crocheted; articles of apparel and clothing accessories, not knitted or crocheted; other made-up textile articles, sets, worn clothing and worn textile articles, rags, as listed in Annex I of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3030/93.
Utemeljitev razveljavitve
Justification for the Repeal
1) Spremembe zakonodajnega okvira
1) Changes in the Regulatory Environment