natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za opredelitev vloge novih udeležencev smernice iz Osla in smernice MCDA ( sredstva vojaške in civilne obrambe ) poskušajo zagotoviti nepristranskost in nevtralnost humanitarnih dejavnosti, kadar se za podporo humanitarnim operacijam uporabljajo sredstva vojaške in civilne obrambe.
In order to formalise the role of the new actors, the Oslo and MCDA ( Military and Civil Defence Assets ) guidelines are designed to ensure that the impartiality and neutrality of humanitarian activities are preserved when military or civil defence assets are used in support of humanitarian operations.
Smernice iz Osla zadevajo humanitarne operacije ob naravnih nesrečah, medtem ko smernice MCDA obravnavajo zapletene izredne razmere; skupno jim je, da določajo temeljno načelo, v skladu s katerim se lahko sredstva vojaške in civilne zaščite uporabljajo le v „skrajnem primeru“.
The Oslo guidelines concern humanitarian activities in natural disasters, while the MCDA guidelines deal with complex emergencies; both work with the basic principle that military and civil defence resources should only be used as a 'last resort'.
S Fribourškim forumom
With the Fribourg Forum
Izjava in akcijski načrt Fribourškega foruma, Švica, 15. in 16. junij 2000. junija 2000 so Združeni narodi začeli program reform za izboljšanje učinkovitosti in kakovosti humanitarne pomoči.
Communiqué and Framework for Action of the Fribourg Forum, Switzerland, 15-16 June 2000. of June 2000, the United Nations embarked on a reform programme to improve the effectiveness and quality of humanitarian aid.
Med predlaganimi novostmi so oblikovanje področij (tematskih skupin), okrepitev sistemov za usklajevanje humanitarne pomoči in vzpostavitev Osrednjega sklada za hitro odzivanje (CERF) za zagotovitev hitre uporabe sredstev pri operacijah takojšnje pomoči.
Innovations proposed include the formation of 'clusters', enhancing the humanitarian coordination system and setting up a Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) to ensure that funds can be made available rapidly for urgent relief operations.
Reforma je po objavi pregleda humanitarnega odziva za leto 2005 (poročilo o oceni humanitarnih intervencij v letu 2005), ki je bil izveden na zahtevo nekdanjega humanitarnega koordinatorja Združenih narodov Jana Egelanda, dosegla višjo stopnjo.
The reform gained new impetus through the publication of the Humanitarian Response Review 2005 , an evaluation made at the request of Jan Egeland, former UN humanitarian coordinator.
Izzivi, ki jih mora Evropska unija obvladati
The challenges facing the European Union
Evropska unija se srečuje s tremi izzivi, k reševanju katerih mora prispevati evropsko soglasje glede humanitarne pomoči.
The European Union faces three challenges which the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid must help it to deal with.
Prvič, Evropska unija mora opredeliti nov obseg humanitarnega delovanja (kdaj se začne in kdaj se konča) ter ponovno potrditi svojo zavezanost spoštovanju in uveljavljanju spoštovanja temeljnih načel pri svojih humanitarnih akcijah (človeškost, nevtralnost, nepristranskost in neodvisnost), prilagoditi svoje sisteme in sredstva za upoštevanje spreminjajoče se narave oboroženih konfliktov, vse pogostejših naravnih nesreč in pojavljanja novih udeležencev.
Firstly, the EU must define the new boundaries for EU humanitarian action (when should it start and when should it end?), reaffirm its commitment to respect, and ensure that others respect, the basic principles of its humanitarian action (humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence) and adapt its own systems and arrangements to take account of the changing nature of armed conflicts, the increasing frequency of natural disasters and the appearance of new actors.
Drugič, Evropska unija mora opredeliti svoje stališče glede novih mednarodnih pobud in postopka reforme, ki se je začel v Združenih narodih.
Secondly, the European Union must define its position with regard to the new international initiatives and the reform process initiated by the United Nations.
Tretjič, Evropska unija mora natančno določiti, kako je mogoče čim bolje združiti in usklajevati različna sredstva Skupnosti in držav članic za izboljšanje njihove uspešnosti in učinkovitosti.
Thirdly, the European Union must work out how the different resources of the Community and the Member States can best be combined and coordinated so as to optimise their efficiency and effectiveness.
Razen tega mora Evropska unija okrepiti svojo politično vlogo na mednarodnem humanitarnem področju, tako da bo ustrezala njenemu statusu največjega mednarodnega donatorja.
Beyond that, it must strengthen its political role on the international humanitarian scene so as to match its status as the world's leading international donor.
Možnosti Evropske unije niso v celoti izkoriščene.
The potential of the European Union is not fully exploited.
V skladu z nedavno oceno GD ECHO je ECHO glavni humanitarni donator na mednarodni ravni
According to a recent evaluation of DG ECHO, ECHO is a leading humanitarian donor at international level
Ocena GD ECHO za obdobje 2000–2005, 23. junij 2006
Evaluation of DG ECHO 2000 – 2005, 23 June 2006
Kljub temu to poročilo o oceni ter poročilo Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj kažeta določene večje strukturne pomanjkljivosti in protislovja.
However, this evaluation report and that by the OECD highlight some major structural weaknesses and some paradoxes.
Komisija ni uresničila možnosti, ki jih ponuja uredba o humanitarni pomoči, ki ji je dodelila vlogo koordinatorja držav članic.
The Commission has not taken up the possibilities given to it by the Regulation on humanitarian aid which assigned to it a coordinating role amongst the Member States.
Usklajevanje med različnimi generalnimi direktorati, ki posredujejo ob humanitarnih krizah (zlasti GD za okolje in GD ECHO), je kljub prizadevanjem neustrezno.
Coordination between the different DGs active in humanitarian crises (in particular, DG Environment and DG ECHO) is unsatisfactory, even though efforts have been made.
Končno, povezavi med nujnim ukrepanjem, obnovo in razvojem je treba nameniti še večjo pozornost.
Lastly, more attention must be devoted to the link between relief, rehabilitation and development.
Pot naprej
The path to follow
Parlament pozdravlja postopek, ki ga je začela Komisija v sporočilu „K evropskemu soglasju glede humanitarne pomoči“.
Parliament welcomes the process initiated by the Commission in its communication entitled 'Towards a European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid'.
Poleg tega se je zavezal, da bo konstruktivno in dejavno sodeloval pri pogajanjih.
It has committed itself to participate constructively and actively in the discussions.
Soglasje bo prvi skupni dokument o politiki humanitarne pomoči po sprejetju uredbe o humanitarni pomoči leta 1996.
The Consensus will be the first joint document on humanitarian aid policy since the adoption of the regulation on humanitarian aid in 1996.
Skrajni čas je, da se obnovijo sedanji temelji in se sprejmejo skupni ukrepi za
It is high time to renew the existing bases and to reach agreement on a joint approach in order to
o ponovno potrditev zavezanosti Evropske unije humanitarnim načelom in mednarodnemu humanitarnemu pravu;
o reaffirm the attachment of the European Union to humanitarian principles and to international humanitarian law;
o razvoj močne evropske politike v mednarodnih organih glede na dodeljena proračunska sredstva;
o develop a strong European policy in international bodies to match the budgetary resources deployed;
o doseganje nove stopnje kakovosti evropske humanitarne pomoči ob okrepljenem sodelovanju evropskih partnerjev v praksi;
o make a marked advance in the quality of European humanitarian aid, with enhanced cooperation with Europe's partners on the ground;
o ponovno potrditev trajne zavezanosti povezovanju humanitarne in razvojne pomoči, ki jo določa evropsko soglasje o razvoju.
o reaffirm its commitment to link humanitarian aid and development assistance, a commitment previously set out in the EU Development Consensus.
Končno, besedilo mora biti dovolj konkretno in natančno za doseganje teh ciljev.
The final text must be concrete and precise enough to attain these objectives.
Poleg vizije, načel in vrednot je treba vključiti tudi časovni načrt za izboljšanje usklajevanja in zagotovitev učinkovite dobave pomoči ob upoštevanju sedanjih izzivov.
It must incorporate not just a vision, principles and values, but also a roadmap to improve coordination and allow effective delivery of aid in the face of the current challenges.
o Evropski uniji in humanitarni pomoči
on the European Union and humanitarian aid
5. poudarja, da mora biti cilj humanitarne pomoči omogočanje samorazvoja in samooskrbe držav oziroma regij prejemnic pomoči, ne pa njihova prevelika odvisnost od dodatne pomoči ali zunanje podpore;
Stresses that humanitarian aid must take account of self-development and self-sufficiency and must not be geared towards making the countries or regions to which the aid is given too dependent on further aid or external assistance;
10. poudarja, da je treba poskrbeti za varnost prostovoljcev in nasploh vseh humanitarnih delavcev ter zagotoviti, da posredovanje civilne varnosti in vojaških enot v nobenem primeru ne bo oviralo dejavnosti humanitarnih organizacij, temveč jih bo dopolnjevalo in podpiralo;
Points to the need to ensure the safety of aid workers and humanitarian workers as a whole, and to make sure that under no circumstances does the use of civil-defence resources and military capabilities hamper the work of humanitarian organisations, but rather complements and supports that work;
Odbor za razvojno sodelovanje
Committee on Development Cooperation
V imenu Odbora za proračun bi želel izraziti nekaj pripomb v zvezi s proračunskim vidikom navedenega poročila.
On behalf of the Budgets Committee, please allow me to make a few remarks concerning the budgetary aspects of the above-mentioned report.
Odbor za proračun se povsem strinja, da bi bilo treba združiti sredstva, ki jih prispevajo Skupnost in države članice, na tak način, da bodo lahko kar najbolj v pomoč žrtvam humanitarnih nesreč.
Firstly, the Budgets Committee strongly shares the view that there is a need to combine the assets of the EC and the Member States in the best possible way for the benefit of the victims of humanitarian disasters.
Pri tem bo pomembno tudi spremljanje tega procesa, na podlagi česar bo mogoče oceniti napredek v zvezi z zavezami EU za izpolnjevanje ciljev Združenih narodov ter globalnega financiranja razvojne in humanitarne pomoči.
Monitoring this process will also be important to assess progress concerning the EU's commitments with regard to UN goals and global financing levels of development actions and humanitarian aid.
V tem smislu bi rad poudaril, da medinstitucionalni sporazum o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, sprejet 17. maja 2006, in finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013, ki mu je priložen, določata, da je rezerva za nujno pomoč namenjena dogodkom, ki jih ni bilo mogoče predvideti ob pripravi proračuna EU.
In this regard, could I point out that the Inter-institutional agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management of 17 May 2006, and the financial framework 2007-2013 annexed to it, provides for an Emergency Aid Reserve to cater for events that could not be foreseen when the EU budget was established.
Rezerva (221 milijonov EUR ob upoštevanju cen leta 2004) se v proračunu opredeli kot „rezervacija“, s katero bi lahko presegli zgornje meje za izdatke, ki sta jih (na podlagi predlogov Komisije) sporazumno določila Parlament in Svet.
This reserve (fixed at EUR 221 million in 2004 prices) is entered in the budget as a 'provision' and can be mobilised over and above the agreed expenditure ceilings by common accord between Parliament and Council (following proposals from the Commission).
Odbor za proračun meni, da je takšna ureditev, sprejeta na pogajanjih o finančnem okviru 2007–2013, odlična, saj je v veliki meri zmanjšala pritisk na proračun in zato ni nevarnosti, da bi morali v proračunu Skupnosti zmanjšati sredstva za druge zunanjepolitične dejavnosti.
The Budgets Committee considers this an excellent arrangement, consolidated during the negotiations for the financial framework 2007-2013, since it significantly alleviated budgetary pressures that could otherwise, potentially, have lead to reductions for other external actions in the EC budget.
V tem primeru namreč ne moremo zagotovo reči, da bi lahko tovrstne dogodke financirali iz nacionalnih proračunov.
It is not certain that such a development could have been compensated for in national budgets.
Razveseljivo je tudi to, da je bil v zadnjem finančnem obdobju (2000–2006) precej zmanjšan povprečni čas, v katerem so bile obravnavane zahteve za uporabo sredstev iz rezerve.
It is also very positive that the average time for dealing with requests to mobilise the Reserve has been greatly reduced over the last financial period (2000-2006).
Opozoriti bi želel, da je bil v obdobju 2000–2006 iz te rezerve (poleg rednih proračunskih sredstev) za izključno humanitarne namene porabljenih 1 514 000 EUR.
Let me point out that, in the period 2000-2006, an amount of EUR 1 514 million was mobilised through this Reserve for strictly humanitarian purposes in addition to the regular budget appropriations.
Nadaljnjih 408 milijonov EUR je bilo porabljenih za pomoč na „sivem področju“ med humanitarno pomočjo in razvojem, na primer v Palestini in na Balkanu.
A further EUR 408 million was also mobilised for actions in the 'grey area' between humanitarian aid and development, for example in Palestine and the Balkans.
Pri tem pa je treba poudariti, da ni bil izrabljen namenski znesek 615 milijonov EUR, ki bi ga lahko porabili za razvojno in/ali humanitarno pomoč iz evropske perspektive.
Nevertheless, a potential amount of EUR 615 million was never mobilised and, thus, probably never came to benefit the areas of development and/or humanitarian aid as seen from a European perspective.
Razlog za to je, da so morda ta neporabljena sredstva, ki so bila v ta namen rezervirana v nacionalnih proračunih, stekla nazaj v splošne proračune, zato so bila za humanitarno in uradno razvojno pomoč izgubljena.
This is so because those amounts, originally earmarked for that purpose in the national budgets, may have flowed back into the 'general budgets' when not mobilised and may therefore have been lost for the specific purpose of humanitarian aid and official development aid.
Zato se Odbor za proračun zavzema za realističen pristop do vključevanja humanitarne pomoči v proračun, pri čemer je treba seveda vedno zagotoviti, da lahko Komisija hitro in smotrno uporabi rezerve za nujno pomoč.
The Budgets Committee therefore supports a realistic approach to the budgeting of humanitarian aid which must, of course, always ensure that the Commission can act swiftly but, also, one that makes good use of the Emergency Aid Reserve.
Tako mora biti v ospredju skrb za učinkovito usklajevanje in dopolnjevanje, tako v EU kot v povezavi z drugimi partnerskimi mednarodnimi donatorji, da bi zagotovili kar največjo učinkovitost naše pomoči in najboljšo uporabo sredstev, ki so zanjo namenjena.
The issue of effective coordination and complementarity, both within the EU and with the other international donors with which we cooperate, should be at the forefront of our concerns in order to maximise the impact of our aid efforts and to ensure the best possible use of the resources set aside for this purpose.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2100/94 o upravičenosti do vložitve prijave za žlahtniteljsko pravico v Skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards the entitlement to file an application for a Community plant variety right
PE 394.143v01-00
PE 394.143v02-00
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0445 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0445 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 37 in 308 pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0274/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 37 and 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0274/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0373/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0373/2007 ),
Žlahtniteljska pravica v Skupnosti
Community plant variety right
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2006/43/ES o obveznih revizijah za letne in konsolidirane računovodske izkaze, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audit of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta spremembi Direktive 2006/43/ES o obveznih revizijah za letne in konsolidirane računovodske izkaze, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audit of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0903 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0903 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 44(2)(g) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0024/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 44(2)(g) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0024/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0374/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0374/2007 ),
Navedena izjava vsebuje seznam aktov, ki bi jih bilo treba nujno prilagoditi, vključno z Direktivo 2006/43/ES.
That statement indicates a list of instruments which should be adjusted as a matter of urgency, including Directive 2006/43/EC.
(3) V skladu s skupno izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije o Sklepu 2006/512/ES se bo ta novi postopek lahko uporabljal za že veljavne akte, sprejete po postopku iz člena 251 Pogodbe, če bodo prilagojeni v skladu z veljavnimi postopki.
(3) In accordance with the joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Decision 2006/512/EC, for this new procedure to be applicable to instruments already in force adopted pursuant to the procedure under Article 251 of the Treaty, they must be adjusted in accordance with the applicable procedures.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 6, UVODNI DEL Člen 29, odstavek 2, Člen 36, odstavek 7 in Člen 47, odstavka 3 in 5 (Direktiva 2006/43/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6, INTRODUCTORY PART Article 29, paragraph 2, Article 36, paragraph 7 and Article 47, paragraphs 3 and 5 (Directive 2006/43/EC)
Členi 29(2), 36(7) ter 47 (3) in (5) se spremenijo:
Articles 29(2), 36(7) and 47 (3) and (5) are amended as follows:
Členi 29(2), 36(7) ter 47(5) se spremenijo:
Articles 29(2), 36(7) and 47(5) are amended as follows:
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 6 A (novo) Člen 45, odstavek 6 (Direktiva 2006/43/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 A (new) Article 45, paragraph 6 (Directive 2006/43/EC)
(6a) Člen 45(6) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(6a) Article 45(6) shall be replaced by the following:
„Da se zagotovi enotna uporaba odstavka 5(d), oceni Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami enakovrednost iz odstavka 5(d) in jo določi v skladu s postopkom iz člena 48(2).
“In order to ensure uniform application of paragraph 5 (d), the equivalence referred to therein shall be assessed by the Commission in cooperation with Member States and shall be decided upon by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Do take odločitve Komisije lahko države članice ocenijo enakovrednost iz odstavka 5(d), dokler Komisija ne sprejme odločitve v skladu s postopkom iz člena 48(2).
Pending such a decision by the Commission, Member States may assess the equivalence referred to in paragraph 5 (d) as long as the Commission has not taken any decision in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Na tej podlagi Komisija lahko sprejme ukrepe, namenjene določanju splošnih meril enakovrednosti v skladu s pogoji iz členov 22, 24, 25 in 26, ki se uporabljajo za vse tretje države in ki jih države članice uporabljajo za ocenjevanje enakovrednosti na nacionalni ravni.
In this context, the Commission may adopt measures, aimed at establishing general equivalence criteria in accordance with the requirements laid down in Articles 22, 24, 25 and 26, which are applicable to all third countries and which shall be used by Member States when assessing the equivalence at national level.
Merila ne smejo presegati pogojev iz členov 22, 24, 25 in 26.
The criteria may not exceed the requirements laid down in Articles 22, 24, 25 and 26.
Navedeni ukrepi za spremembo nebistvenih določb te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 48(2a).“
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 48(2a).”
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 6 B (novo) Člen 46, odstavek 2 (Direktiva 2006/43/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 B (new) Article 46, paragraph 2 (Directive 2006/43/EC)
(6b) Člen 46(2) se nadomesti z:
(6b)Article 46(2) shall be replaced by the following:
„Da se zagotovi enotna uporaba odstavka 1 tega člena, oceni Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami enakovrednost iz tega odstavka in jo določi v skladu s postopkom iz člena 48(2).
“In order to ensure uniform application of paragraph 1 of this Article, the equivalence referred to therein shall be assessed by the Commission in cooperation with Member States and shall be decided upon by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Države članice lahko ocenijo enakovrednost iz odstavka 1 tega člena ali se zanesejo na ocene drugih držav članic, dokler Komisija ne sprejme odločitve v skladu s postopkom iz člena 48(2).
Member States may assess the equivalence referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article or rely on the assessments carried out by other Member States as long as the Commission has not taken any decision in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Če Komisija odloči, da zahteva po enakovrednosti iz odstavka 1 tega člena ni izpolnjena, lahko zadevnim revizorjem in revizijskim družbam dovoli opravljanje revizijskih dejavnosti v skladu z ustreznimi zahtevami države članice v ustreznem prehodnem obdobju.
If the Commission decides that the requirement of equivalence referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article is not complied with, it may allow the auditors and audit entities concerned to continue their audit activities in accordance with the relevant Member State 's requirements during an appropriate transitional period.
Na tej podlagi Komisija lahko sprejme ukrepe, namenjene določanju splošnih meril enakovrednosti v skladu s pogoji iz členov 29, 30 in 32, ki se uporabljajo za vse tretje države in ki jih države članice uporabljajo za ocenjevanje enakovrednosti na nacionalni ravni.
In this context, the Commission may adopt measures, aimed at establishing general equivalence criteria in accordance with the requirements laid down in Articles 29, 30 and 32, which are applicable to all third countries and which shall be used by Member States when assessing the equivalence at national level.
Merila ne smejo presegati pogojev iz členov 29, 30 in 32.
The criteria may not exceed the requirements laid down in Articles 29, 30 and 32.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 6 C (novo) Člen 47, odstavek 3 (Direktiva 2006/43/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 C (new) Article 47, paragraph 3 (Directive 2006/43/EC)
(6c) Člen 47(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(6c) Article 47(3) shall be replaced by the following:
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s sklepom Komisije.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to comply with the Commission's decision.