natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Generalni direktor Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču v okviru postopka dogovarjanja iz člena 11a redno poroča o ugotovitvah preiskav, ki jih izvaja urad, sprejetih ukrepih in težavah, s katerimi se srečuje, pri čemer mora spoštovati zaupnost teh preiskav, zakonite pravice vpletenih oseb in po potrebi nacionalne določbe, ki veljajo za sodne postopke.
The Director General shall report regularly to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors , in the context of the concertation procedure referred to in Article 11a, on the findings of investigations carried out by the Office, the action taken and the problems encountered, whilst respecting the confidentiality of the investigations, the legitimate rights of the persons concerned and, where approp ria te, national provisions applicable to judicial proceedings.
Zgornje institucije zagotovijo spoštovanje zaupnosti preiskav, ki jih vodi urad, ter zakonite pravice vpletenih oseb in, če se uvede sodni postopek, spoštovanje vseh nacionalnih določb, ki veljajo za takšne postopke. “
The above institutions shall ensure that the confidentiality of the investigations conducted by the Office is respected, together with the legitimate rights of the persons concerned, and, where judicial proceedings have been instituted, that all national provisions applicable to such proceedings have been adhered to. ”
Med drugim mora Urad zainteresiranim institucijam razložiti tudi, kakšne ukrepe je sprejel na podlagi preiskav ter na kakšne težave je pri tem naletel.
The subjects to be reported on to the institutions concerned should include the action taken following investigations carried out by the Office and the problems encountered.
Člen 1 – točka 12 d
Article 1 - point 12 d
Člen 12 – odstavek 4 – alinea 1
Article 12 - paragraph 4 - subparagraph 1
Pred sprejetjem morebitnih disciplinskih ukrepov zoper generalnega direktorja se Komisija posvetuje z nadzornim odborom na srečanju s predstavniki drugih institucij v okviru strukturiranega dialoga .
Before adopting any disciplinary sanction against the Director General, the Commission shall consult the Supervisory Committee, meeting with the representatives of the other institutions in the context of the structured dialogue .
Pred sprejetjem morebitnih disciplinskih ukrepov zoper generalnega direktorja se Komisija posvetuje z nadzornim odborom na srečanju s predstavniki Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v okviru postopka dogovarjanja iz člena 11a .
Before adopting any disciplinary sanction against the Director General, the Commission shall consult the Supervisory Committee, meeting with representatives of the European Parliament and of the Council in the context of the concertation procedure foreseen in Article 11a .
Postopek dogovarjanja Komisiji nudi institucionalni okvir za razpravo o morebitnih disciplinskih ukrepih zoper generalnega direktorja.
The concertation procedure provides the Commission with the institutional framework for debating any disciplinary measures against the Director General.
Glede na pomen ukrepa, ki naj se sprejme, je treba zagotoviti, da se o teh ukrepih ne razpravlja samo z nadzornim odborom, ampak tudi z drugimi zainteresiranimi institucijami.
In view of the importance of the measure to be taken, it is desirable to ensure that these measures are discussed not only with the Supervisory Committee but also with the other institutions concerned.
Treba je jasno določiti, da Evropski parlament in Svet enakopravno sodelujeta v disciplinskem postopku proti generalnemu direktorju.
In the case of a potential disciplinary sanction against the Director General, it must be made clear that the European Parliament and the Council are fully involved in the procedure.
Člen 1 – točka 12 d a (novo)
Article 1 - point 12 d a
Člen 12 – odstavek 4 a (novo)
Article 12 - paragraph 4 a (new)
Člen 1 – točka 12 a (novo)
Article 1 – point 12 a (new)
Generalni direktor Urada lahko nastopi v zadevah, povezanih z dejavnostmi Urada, ki potekajo pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti, in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pred nacionalnimi sodišči.
The Director General of the Office may intervene in cases, in connection with the conduct of the Office’s activities, brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities and, in accordance with national law, before the national courts.
Preden nastopi pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti ali nacionalnimi sodišči, generalni direktor zaprosi za mnenje nadzornega odbora.“
Before intervening before the Court of Justice of the European Communities or the national courts, the Director General of the Office shall seek an opinion of the Supervisory Committee.”.
V skladu z zamislijo iz člena 12 te uredbe, da se generalnemu direktorju Urada omogoči, da pravno oceni, ali določen ukrep zbuja dvom o njegovi neodvisnosti, je tudi primerno, da ima pravico vključiti se v postopek pred Sodiščem in podpreti neko stranko pri vprašanjih v zvezi z opravljanjem njegove preiskovalne funkcije.
In line with the idea contained in Article 12 of this Regulation that the Director General of OLAF should be empowered to arrange for any measures which call its independence into question to be examined by a court, it is also worthwhile to give him a power to intervene in support of a party before the Court where the exercise of its investigative function is at issue.
To pravico se lahko razširi tudi na postopke pred nacionalnimi sodišči.
This right of intervention may also be extended to include intervention before national courts.
Nadzorni odbor da svoje mnenje.
The Supervisory Committee must deliver its opinion.
Revizijski svetovalec
Review adviser
Nadzor nad zakonitostjo preiskav Urada
Review of legality of the Office’s investigations
Generalni direktor Urada na predlog nadzornega odbora imenuje revizijskega svetovalca, njegov mandat traja pet let in ni obnovljiv.
The Director General of the Office, acting on a proposal from the Supervisory Committee, shall appoint a Review Adviser for a non-renewable term of five years.
Predlog odbora temelji na seznamu kandidatov, ki se sestavi po razpisu.
The Supervisory Committee shall base its proposal on a list of several candidates drawn up following a call for applications.
Cilj nadzora zakonitosti preiskav Urada je spoštovanje postopkovnih jamstev in temeljnih pravic oseb, ki jih zadeva preiskava Urada.
The review of legality of the Office’s investigations shall concern respect for the procedural guarantees and fundamental rights of the people involved in an Office investigation.
Revizijski svetovalec je pri opravljanju svojih nalog popolnoma neodvisen.
The Review Adviser shall act in complete independence.
Pri opravljanju svojih nalog ne zahteva in ne sprejema navodil od nikogar.
He shall neither seek nor take instructions from anyone in the performance of his duties.
Znotraj Urada ne opravlja nobene funkcije razen spremljanja skladnosti s postopki.
He shall perform no functions within the Office other than those related to monitoring compliance with procedures.
Nadzor zakonitosti se opravlja pred začetkom in pred zaključkom preiskave, pred vsakim posredovanjem podatkov zadevnim pristojnim organom držav članic iz členov 9 in 10 ter v zvezi z oceno popolne tajnosti preiskave.
The review of legality shall be carried out before the opening and after the close of an investigation, before any forwarding of information to the competent authorities in the Member States concerned within the meaning of Articles 9 and 10, and in connection with an evaluation of the absolute confidentiality of the investigation.
Pred sprejetjem kakršnih koli disciplinskih ukrepov zoper revizijskega svetovalca se generalni direktor Urada posvetuje z nadzornim odborom.
Before adopting any disciplinary measure concerning the Review Adviser, the Director General of the Office shall consult the Supervisory Committee.
Nadzor nad zakonitostjo preiskav izvajajo pravni izvedenci in strokovnjaki na področju preiskovalnega postopka Urada, ki so usposobljeni za opravljanje sodne funkcije v državi članici.
The review of legality of investigations shall be carried out by Office experts in law and investigative procedure who are qualified to exercise judicial office in a Member State .
Njihovo mnenje se priloži končnemu poročilu o preiskavi.
Their opinion shall be appended to the final investigation report.
Katera koli oseba, ki je osebno vpletena v preiskavo v teku, lahko prosi revizijskega svetovalca za mnenje v zvezi s postopkovnimi jamstvi, predvidenimi v členu 6(5) in členu 7a.
Anyone personally implicated by an investigation may ask the Review Adviser to give an opinion regarding the procedural guarantees provided for in Article 6(5) and Article 7a.
Revizijski svetovalec lahko izda mnenja o teh zadevah na lastno pobudo.
The Review Adviser may also issue opinions of his own motion on those matters.
Postopkovna pravila iz člena 15a podrobno določajo postopek za nadzor zakonitosti.
The procedural code referred to in Article 15a sets out the procedure for the legality review.
Revizijski svetovalec prejme primere, za katere se zahteva mnenje, od generalnega direktorja Urada v okoliščinah iz člena 6(7) in tretjega pododstavka člena 7a(2).
Cases shall be referred for the opinion of the Review Adviser by the Director General of the Office in the circumstances referred to in Article 6(7) and the third subparagraph of Article 7a(2).
Generalni direktor Urada lahko predloži revizijskemu svetovalcu vsak zahtevek v zvezi s pregledom preiskav.
The Director General of the Office may also submit any request to the Review Adviser in connection with the review of investigations.
Revizijski svetovalec o svojih dejavnostih redno poroča nadzornemu odboru; nadzornemu odboru in Komisiji pošilja redna statistična in analitična poročila o vprašanjih, ki zadevajo trajanje preiskav in postopkovna jamstva.
The Review Adviser shall report regularly to the Supervisory Committee on his activities; he shall present it, and the Commission, with regular statistical and analytical reports on questions related to the duration of investigations and procedural guarantees.
Dovoljeno je, da se poročila revizijskega svetovalca ne nanašajo na posamezne primere v preiskavi. “
The Review Adviser’s reports may not refer to individual cases under investigation.
Poleg nadzora nacionalnih sodišč in Sodišča nad zakonitostjo preiskav Urada je treba pojasniti operativno prakso urada OLAF na tem področju.
In addition to a review of the legality of OLAF's investigations by national courts and the Court of Justice, it is desirable to clarify the operational practices of OLAF in this field.
Nadzor nad zakonitostjo, ki ga izvaja Urad, zagotavlja spoštovanje postopkovnih jamstev in temeljnih pravic oseb, ki jih zadevajo preiskave.
The legality review by OLAF ensures respect for procedural guarantees and the fundamental rights of the persons concerned.
Ta praksa temelji na znanju, ki ga imajo „sodni svetovalci“ urada OLAF o pravu Skupnosti v zvezi s preiskavami ter o nacionalnem pravu in postopku.
This practice is based on the knowledge which OLAF's 'Review Advisers' possess of Community law concerning investigations and national law and procedure.
Vložitev pritožb oseb, ki jih zadevajo preiskave Urada
“Article 14 a Filing of complaints by persons concerned by Office investigations
Katera koli oseba, ki jo preiskava v teku osebno zadeva, lahko vloži pritožbo pri nadzornem odboru, v kateri navaja kršitev svojih postopkovnih ali človekovih pravic med tekom preiskave.
Any person personally concerned by an investigation may lodge a complaint with the Supervisory Committee alleging a violation of his procedural or human rights in the course of the investigation.
Če nadzorni odbor prejme pritožbo, jo nemudoma posreduje revizijskemu svetovalcu.
Following reception of a complaint, the Supervisory Committee shall transmit without any delay the complaint to a Review Adv iser.
Predlog nadzornega odbora temelji na seznamu kandidatov, ki se sestavi po razpisu.
The Supervisory Committee shall base its proposal on a list of several candidates drawn up following a call for applications.
Pri opravljanju svojih nalog ne zahteva in ne sprejema navodil od nikogar.
He/she shall neither seek nor take instructions from anyone in the performance of his duties.
Znotraj Urada ne opravlja nobene funkcije razen spremljanja skladnosti s postopki.
He/she shall perform no functions within the Office other than those related to monitoring compliance with procedures .
Revizijski svetovalec je prav zato pristojen za obravnavo pritožb informatorjev, vključno z osebami iz člena 22 Kadrovskih predpisov uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti.
The Review Adviser is also competent for dealing with the complaints of the informants, including persons falling under A rticle 22 of the Staff Regulation s of the Community institutions.
Revizijski svetovalec predloži svoje mnenje pritožniku, nadzornemu odboru in generalnemu direktorju v roku 30 delovnih dni po predložitvi pritožbe.
The Review Adviser within no more than 30 working days of the forwarding of the complaint shall give the complainant, the Supervisory Committee and the Direc tor Gen eral his/her opinion.
Revizijski svetovalec o svojih dejavnostih redno poroča nadzornemu odboru.
The Review Adviser shall report regularly to the Supervisory Committee on his activities.
Nadzornemu odboru in Komisiji pošilja redna statistična in analitična poročila o vprašanjih, ki zadevajo pritožbe.
He/she shall present it, and the Commission, with regular statistical and analytical reports on questions related to complaints.
15) Člen 15 se črta.
(15) Article 15 is deleted.
15) Člen 15 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(15) Article 15 is replaced by the following:
„V četrtem letu po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe Komisija pošlje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o izvajanju te uredbe , priloži pa mu mnenje nadzornega odbora [...].
“ During the fourth year following the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall transmit to the European Parliament and the Council a […] report on the application of this Regulation, together with an opinion by the Supervisory Committee […].
V tem poročilu je določeno, ali je potrebna sprememba te uredbe.
The report shall state whether there is a need to amend this Regulation.
V vsakem primeru je treba to uredbo spremeniti po ustanovitvi Evropskega javnega tožilstva.“
In any event, this Regulation shall be amended after the creation of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office.”
Treba je ohraniti možnost Komisije, da predloži poročilo o izvajanju te uredbe.
There is a need to preserve the opportunity for the Commission to report on the application of this regulation.
Predvideti je treba tudi možnost spremembe te uredbe zavoljo upoštevanja zaključkov poročila.
It is also desirable to provide for the option of amending the regulation to take account of that report.
Zaradi vpliva, ki ga bo imelo evropsko javno tožilstvo na boj proti goljufijam, je treba po njegovi ustanovitvi obvezno spremeniti to uredbo.
In view of the impact of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office on the fight against fraud we need to specify that the regulation should be amended as soon as that office is set up.
Izvedbeni ukrepi za uporabo postopkovnih jamstev v upravnih preiskavah, ki jih opravlja Urad, kakor je predvideno v tej uredbi, se sprejmejo z regulativnim postopkom iz člena 15b(2).
Implementing measures relating to the application of procedural guarantees in administrative investigations by the Office as provided for by this Regulation shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 15b(2).
Urad sprejme „Postopkovna pravila za preiskave urada OLAF“, ki vključujejo pravna in zlasti postopkovna načela, ki jih določa ta direktiva.
The Office shall adopt a ‘procedural code for OLAF investigations’ incorporating the judicial and procedural principles adopted under the present regulation.
Upošteva operativno prakso Urada.
It shall take account of the Office’s operational practices.
Postopkovna pravila natančno določajo prakse pri izvajanju mandata in poslovnika Urada, splošna načela, ki urejajo preiskovalni postopek, različne stopnje in poglavitna dejanja postopka, zakonite pravice oseb, ki jih preiskava zadeva, postopkovna jamstva, določbe v zvezi z varstvom podatkov ter politiko sporočanja in dostopanja do dokumentov, določbe v zvezi nadzorom nad zakonitostjo ter pravna sredstva oseb, ki jih preiskava zadeva.
The procedural code shall set out the practices to be observed in implementing the mandate and statute of the Office, general principles governing investigative procedures, as well as the main investigative acts, the legitimate rights and procedural guarantees of the persons concerned, provisions relating to data protection and policies on communication and access to documents, provisions on review of legality and the means of redress open to the people concerned.
Pred sprejetjem postopkovnih pravil se za mnenje zaprosi Evropski parlament, Svet, Komisijo in nadzorni odbor Urada.
Before adoption of the procedural code, the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Office’s Supervisory Committee shall be consulted.
Nadzorni odbor zagotavlja neodvisnost Urada v postopku sprejemanja postopkovnih pravil.
The Supervisory Committee shall ensure the independence of the Office in adopting the procedural code.
Pravila se lahko posodobijo na predlog generalnega direktorja Urada.
The code may be updated on a proposal from the Director General of the Office.
V tem primeru se uporabi postopek sprejemanja iz tega člena.
In this case the adoption procedure referred to in the present article shall be applied.
Postopkovna pravila, ki jih sprejme Urad, se objavijo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The procedural code adopted by the Office shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Treba je ustvariti pravno podlago, ki bo uradu OLAF omogočila sprejetje postopkovnih pravil, ki bodo zagotavljala večjo preglednost njegovega delovanja.
It is desirable to create a legal basis to allow OLAF to adopt a procedural code for its investigations, in order to ensure greater transparency of OLAF's operations.
Člen 15 b
Article 15 b
Rok iz člena 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES je tri mesece.
The period referred to in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be three months.
Zaradi predlaganih sprememb, kot so določbe v zvezi s preverjanjem zakonitosti in postopkovnimi jamstvi na eni strani in določbe v zvezi z določitvijo postopka dogovarjanja na drugi strani, ta odbor postane nepotreben.
In view of the amendments proposed, such as, firstly, the provisions on review of legality and procedural guarantees, and secondly, the provisions on the establishment of a concertation procedure, this committee becomes superfluous.
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1073/1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti‑Fraud Office (OLAF)
Komisija je 24. maja 2006 odobrila nov predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1073/1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF)
On 24 May 2006, the Commission approved a new proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
Spremembe, ki v veliki meri povzemajo vsebino predloga iz leta 2004 in jo želijo izboljšati, se osredotočajo predvsem na naslednje elemente:
The proposal, which draws considerably on, and is intended to enhance, the content of the 2004 proposal, centres on the following points:
· odnose med nadzornim odborom, uradom OLAF, institucijami ter drugimi organi oziroma uradi in agencijami;
· relations between the supervisory committee, OLAF and the institutions and other bodies, offices and agencies;
· pravice oseb, ki so vpletene v preiskave;
· the rights of persons implicated in investigations;
· oblikovanje mesta za revizijskega svetovalca;
· the introduction of a Review Advisor;
· izboljšanje izmenjave informacij med uradom OLAF, evropskimi institucijami in organi, državami članicami in informatorji;
· improving the information flow between OLAF, the European institutions and bodies, the Member States and ‘whistleblowers’;
· mandat generalnega direktorja;
· the term of office of the Director General;
· financiranje Urada.
· the funding of the Office.
Gledano v celoti, se zdi predlog Komisije primeren in uravnotežen.
Overall, the Commission proposal appears to be reasonable and balanced.
Vendar pa poročevalec meni, da je treba predlagati določena spremembe besedila, da se tako izboljša njegova učinkovitost, ob upoštevanju namena reforme predloga.
However, your rapporteur would suggest certain changes to make the proposal more effective, given that its objective is reform.
Zlasti je treba pri prvem pododstavku člena 5(2) pojasniti, da o začetku zunanje preiskave odloča generalni direktor, preiskave pa se ne sprožijo samo na zahtevo države članice ali Komisije ampak tudi na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta.
In particular, the first subparagraph of Article 5(2) should make clear that the Director General may open an external investigation at the request of the European Parliament as well as at the request of a Member State or the Commission.
Nasprotno pa bi bilo treba tretji pododstavek člena 5(2), ki predvideva prepoved opravljanja vzporedne notranje preiskave s strani urada OLAF in upravne preiskave s strani zadevnih institucij ali organov, ponovno oblikovati, da bi se omogočilo sočasnost preiskav in istočasno kar največjo mero sodelovanja.
Contrariwise, the third subparagraph of Article 5(2), which provides that while the Office is conducting internal investigations, the institutions or bodies concerned may not open a parallel investigation, should be reworded so as to accept that such investigations may be conducted at the same time and ensure that there is the greatest possible cooperation between them.
Na eni strani se dejansko ne more prepovedati instituciji, da bi sama izvedla upravno preiskavo v okviru svojih notranjih nadzornih pristojnosti, na drugi strani pa bi bila zahteva za sodelovanje v popolnem soglasju s strukturnim dialogom med Uradom in institucijami, ki je predviden v členu 11a predloga Komisije.
For it is not possible to prohibit an institution from exercising its own powers of exercising internal control by conducting an internal investigation, and requiring cooperation in such cases would fully accord with the 'structured dialogue' between the Office and the institutions referred to in Article 11a of the Commission proposal.
Treba bi bilo okrepiti postopkovna jamstva, predvidena v členu 7a, da se zadevni osebi omogoči primerno izvajanje obrambe.
The procedural guarantees set out in Article 7a should be strengthened to ensure the person concerned is fully able to defend himself.
Še zlasti bi bilo treba preoblikovati člen 7a(4), da postopkovna jamstva, predvidena v isti določbi, ne izključujejo širše zaščite, ki trenutno izhaja iz Pogodbe, Listina o temeljnih pravicah in iz drugih veljavnih določb, vključno z nacionalnimi.
Article 7a(4) should be reworded to ensure that the procedural guarantees provided for in that article do not preclude the more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the treaties, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and any other applicable provisions, including national provisions.
Zato je treba spremeniti uvodno izjavo 5, ki se nanaša na to določbo.
Recital 5, which relates to that provision, should be amended accordingly.