natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1). in ne posega vanjo,
1). and is without prejudice to it,
H. ker so omejitve temeljnih svoboščin po Pogodbi o ES možne, če je njihov namen doseganje zakonitih ciljev v skladu s Pogodbo, če so upravičene z obveznim razlogom javnega interesa, če so primerne za uresničitev zastavljenih ciljev in če obsegajo le, kar je za to nujno potrebno; ker se smejo v skladu s členom 52 Listine temeljnih pravic vse omejitve uveljavljanja pravic in svoboščin, ki jih priznava ta listina, sprejeti samo, če so sorazmerne in potrebne ter če resnično izpolnjujejo cilje splošnega interesa, ki jih priznava Unija, ali izpolnjujejo potrebo po zaščiti pravic in svoboščin drugih,
H. whereas restrictions on fundamental freedoms are possible under the EC Treaty, if they pursue legitimate aims compatible with the Treaty, are justified by an overriding reason of public interest, are suitable to attain the objectives pursued and do not go beyond what is necessary to attain them; whereas at the same time, according to Article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, any limitations on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by that Charter may be made only if they are proportional and necessary and if they genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others,
I. ker ima Sodišče pristojnost, da razlaga pravo Skupnosti glede na temeljne pravice in svoboščine in zagotovi upoštevanje prava pri razlagi in uporabi Pogodbe o ES,
I. whereas it is the role of the Court of Justice to interpret Community law in the light of fundamental rights and freedoms and to ensure that in the interpretation and application of the EC Treaty the law is observed,
J. ker je v pristojnosti nacionalnih sodišč, da za vsak primer posebej preverijo, ali so izpolnjena merila, ki omogočajo omejitev temeljnih svoboščin skladno s pravom Skupnosti,
J. whereas it is up to the national courts to ascertain, on a case-by-case basis, whether the criteria for regarding the restriction of fundamental freedoms as compatible with Community law are fulfilled,
K. ker je enotna uporaba in uveljavljanje določb direktive o napotitvi delavcev bistvena za zagotavljanje njenih ciljev, zlasti upoštevanje veljavne ureditve kolektivnih pogajanj v državah članicah,
K. whereas uniform application and enforcement of the provisions of the PWD are essential in order to ensure its objectives, and in particular respect for collective bargaining arrangements existing in the Member States,
L. ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da so znotraj Sodišča in med Sodiščem ter njegovimi generalnimi pravobranilci v različnih zadevah obstajala različna stališča in razlage direktive o napotitvi delavcev na delo, zlasti v zadevi C-341/05 Laval
L. whereas it has been noted that differing views and interpretations existed within the Court of Justice and between the Court and its Advocates-General in the various cases relating to the PWD, in particular in Case C-341/05 Laval
Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 18. decembra 2007 v zadevi C-341/05, Laval un Partneri Ltd [2007] ECR I 11767 (zadeva Laval). in zadevi C-346/06 Rüffert
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 December 2007 in Case C-341/05 Laval un Partneri Ltd [2007] ECR I‑11767 (the Laval case). and Case C-346/06 Rüffert
9). ; ker bi bila ob takšnem razhajanju stališč in razlag morda potrebna jasnejša opredelitev glede ravnotežja med temeljnimi pravicami in svoboščinami,
9). ; whereas when such views and interpretations differ, there may be a case for clarification in the light of the balance between fundamental rights and freedoms,
2. poudarja, da v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča države članice ne smejo predpisati minimalnih standardov v zadevah, ki niso predvidene v direktivi o napotitvi delavcev, in da njihove vsebine ne sme določati vir, ki ni predviden v direktivi;
Underlines that, according to the case-law of the Court of Justice, Member States may not impose minimum standards in matters other than those provided for in the PWD and the content of such minimum standards may not be determined by a source which is not provided for by that directive;
8. v zvezi s tem pozdravlja Priporočilo Komisije z dne 3. aprila 2008
Welcomes in that respect the Commission’s Recommendation of 3 April 2008
UL C 85, 4.4.2008, str.
OJ C 85, 4.4.2008, p.
1 in UL C 89, 10.4.2008, str.
1 and OJ C 89, 10.4.2008, p.
18. in Sklepe Sveta z dne 9. junija 2008
18. and the Council Conclusions of 9 June 2008
Sklepi še niso bili objavljeni v UL. o okrepljenem upravnem sodelovanju na področju napotitve delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev;
Not yet published in the OJ. on enhanced administrative cooperation in the context of the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services;
A. ker se pravica do kolektivnega ukrepanja priznava kot temeljna pravica v splošnih načelih prava Skupnosti in ker je to pravico potrdilo Evropsko sodišče,
A. whereas the right to take collective action is recognized as fundamental right in the general principles of Community law, and whereas this right has been confirmed by the European Court of Justice,
1. poudarja, da je treba ohraniti ravnotežje med svobodo zagotavljanja storitev in svobodo ustanavljanja ter zagotavljanjem regulativnega okvira za varstvo delavcev;
Underlines the need to maintain the balance between the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establishment and guaranteeing a regulatory framework for the protection of workers;
1. , ali prisila ponudnikov storitev, da se začnejo pogajati o teh delovnih pogojih s sindikati, povzroča neupravičeno omejevanje svobode zagotavljanja storitev; zato meni, da ne sme biti namen kolektivnega ukrepanja, da bi določalo delovne pogoje, ki presegajo direktivo 96/71/ES in niso dovolj natančni in dosegljivi;
1. , or forcing service providers to enter into negotiations on such working conditions with trade unions, leads to an unjustified restriction on the freedom to provide services; is of the opinion, therefore, that collective actions must not aim at imposing working conditions which go beyond Directive 96/71/EC and which are not sufficiently precise and accessible;
5. poudarja, da člen 3(7) direktive 96/71/ES omogoča napotenim delavcem, da imajo korist od ugodnejših pogojev iz lastne države med svojo napotitvijo v državo gostiteljico;
Points out that Article 3(7) of Directive 96/71/EC enables posted workers to benefit from the home country's more advantageous conditions during their posting in the host country;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi jasno stališče o pravici držav članic, da lahko presežejo trdno jedro minimalnih delovnih pogojev, če se ti višji standardi v splošnem uporabljajo na ozemlju, kjer se izvaja delo.
Calls on the Commission to make a clear statement with regard to the right of Member States to go beyond the hard core of minimum labour standards as long as these higher standards are generally applicable within the territory where the work is carried out.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o lažjem čezmejnem pregonu na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council facilitating cross-border enforcement in the field of road safety
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve Error!
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 31
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0151 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0151 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 71(1)(c) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0149/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251, paragraph 2 and Article 71, paragraph 1(c) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0149/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ter mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (A6 - 0371/2008),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0371/2008 ),
(5) Ta sistem bi moral zajemati vrste prometnih prekrškov, s katerimi se resno ogroža varnost v cestnem prometu, in tiste, ki so opredeljeni kot prometni prekrški v zakonodajah vseh državah članicah.
(5) The types of road traffic offences to be covered by this system should reflect their seriousness in terms of endangering road safety and should cover offences which are qualified as traffic offences in the laws of all Member States.
V skladu s tem bi bilo ustrezno sprejeti določbe za prekoračitev dovoljene hitrosti, vožnjo pod vplivom alkohola, neuporabo varnostnega pasu in vožnjo skozi rdečo luč.
It is accordingly appropriate to make provision in relation to speeding, drink-driving, non-use of a seat-belt, and failing to stop at a red traffic light.
Komisija bo spremljala razvoj po EU v zvezi z drugimi cestno prometnimi prekrški z resnimi posledicami za varnost v cestnem prometu in lahko po potrebi predlaga spremembe direktive , da bi jih vključila v njeno področje uporabe, recimo vožnjo pod vplivom mamil, uporabo mobilnega telefona med vožnjo in vožnjo brez obveznega avtomobilskega zavarovanja .
The Commission will continue to monitor developments across the EU in respect of other road traffic offences with serious implications for road safety and if appropriate will consider proposing a revision of the Directive in order to cover them within its scope, such as driving under the influence of drugs, use of mobile phones while driving and uninsured driving.
Komisija bo spremljala razvoj po EU v zvezi z drugimi cestno prometnimi prekrški z resnimi posledicami za varnost v cestnem prometu .
The Commission will continue to monitor developments across the EU in respect of other road traffic offences with serious implications for road safety .
Po preložitvi poročila o izvajanju direktive dve leti po začetku njene veljavnosti bo Komisija po potrebi predlagala spremembo direktive za povečanje področja njene uporabe, da bi vanjo vključili tudi druge prometne prekrške .
Following the submission of a report on the implementation of this Directive two years after it s ent ry into force, the Commission will, if appropriate , propose a revision of the Directive regarding the possibility of extending its scope to include any other categories of road traffic infringements .
Obstajati mora možnost, da se direktiva v srednjeročnem obdobju spremeni, da se vanjo vključijo nove vrste prekrškov, kot so vožnja pod vplivom drog ali brez vozniškega dovoljenja.
It must be possible to revise the Directive in the medium term with a view to including new types of offence, such as driving under the influence of drugs and driving without a licence.
Da bi bilo to mogoče, mora Komisija pripraviti poročilo o izvajanju direktive.
In order to do so, the Commission must submit a report on the implementation of the Directive.
(5a) Za zagotovitev zadostne stopnje varnosti v cestnem prometu in sorazmernost kazni, ki se uporabljajo, bi morala Komisija z državami članicami razpravljati o uvedbi usklajenega sistema fiksnih kaznih za prometne prekrške ter bi morala države članice spodbujati k izmenjavi najboljših praks.
(5a) To guarantee a sufficient degree of road safety and to ensure that the penalties applicable are proportionate , the Commission should hold discussions with the Member States on the introduction of harmonised fixed penalties for road traffic infringements and should also encourage the exchange of best practices between Member S t ates .
Čezmejno izvrševanje kazni za prometne prekrške mora temeljiti na enotnem sistemu fiksnih kazni, saj je to edini način za preprečitev določanja nesorazmerno visokih kazni.
Cross-border penalising of traffic offences must be based on a single schedule of fixed penalties, since that is the only way to prevent disproportionately high penalties from being set.
(6) Zaradi zagotavljanja učinkovitosti sistema pregona bi ta moral zajemati obdobje od ugotovitve prekrška do pošiljanja obvestila o prekršku, izdelanega v skladu s standardnim obrazcem, imetniku potrdila o registraciji zadevnega vozila.
(6) In order to ensure its effectiveness, the system of enforcement should cover the phases between the detection of an offence and the sending of an offence notification, based on a standard model, to the holder of the registration certificate of the vehicle concerned.
Po sprejetju dokončne odločbe se uporablja Okvirni sklep Sveta 2005/214/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni.
Once a final decision has been taken, the Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties applies .
Po sprejetju dokončne odločbe se lahko uporablja Okvirni sklep Sveta 2005/214/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni.
Once a final decision has been taken, the Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties may apply.
V primeru, ko se okvirni sklep ne more uporabljati, če na primer odločbe o sankcijah ne sodijo na področje kazenskega prava, se mora učinkovitost sankcij zagotoviti z drugimi ukrepi za njihovo izvrševanje.
Where that Framework Decision cannot be applied, for example because sanction decisions do not fall within the scope of criminal law, the effectiveness of the sanctions should nevertheless be ensured by other sanction enforcement measures.
Za obvestila o prekrških, vključno z obvestili glede odgovora, bi bilo treba določiti minimalne standarde in bolj usklajene metode pošiljanja, da bi čezmejni pregon postal zanesljivejši in učinkovitejši.
A minimum standard ought to be introduced for offence notifications, including response notices, and for more compatible methods of sending them so that cross-border enforcement becomes more reliable and more effective .
Učinkovitost sankcij, ki se prenašajo med državami članicami, je zagotovljena z okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2005/214/PNZ za odločbe, ki izhajajo iz kaznivega dejanja.
The effectiveness of sanctions transmitted between Member States is ensured by Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA for decisions involving criminal offences.
Ker pa ta okvirni sklep ne zajema vseh primerov v Evropski uniji, je treba za njegovo dopolnitev vzpostaviti druge načine uporabe sankcij, zlasti kadar se o sankcijah odloča na upravni ravni.
However, this Decision does not cover all such cases within the European Union; other means of sanction enforcement must therefore be established in order to complete the framework agreement, particularly where sanction decisions are taken by administrative authorities.
(7) Čezmejna izmenjava informacij bi morala potekati hitro z elektronskimi sredstvi.
(7) Further, the cross-border exchange of information should be carried out rapidly by electronic means.
V ta namen bi bilo treba vzpostaviti elektronsko omrežje EU .
To this end , an EU electronic network should be set up .
V ta namen bi bilo zaželeno, da se vzpostavijo varna elektronska omrežja Skupnosti, ki bi omogočala varno izmenjavo informacij in zagotavljala zaupnost posredovanih podatkov.
To this end, it is desirable that secure Community electronic networks be set up , enabling the exchange of information in secure conditions and ensuring the confidentiality of the data transmitted .
Tako vzpostavljena elektronska omrežja morajo zagotavljati varnost in zaupnost podatkov.
The electronic networks thus created must ensure data security and confidentiality.
(8) Ker so podatki v zvezi z identifikacijo storilca prekrška osebni, bi morale države članice sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev skladnosti z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov.
(8) Since the data relating to the identification of an offender is personal, Member States must take the measures necessary to ensure that Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data is complied with.
Storilcu prekrška se v obvestilu o prekršku posreduje tudi informacije o njegovih pravicah glede dostopa do podatkov, njihovih popravkov in izbrisa ter o najdaljšem zakonitem roku njihove hrambe.
The offender shall be informed accordingly, when notified of the offence, of his or her rights regarding access to, rectification of and deletion of data and of the maximum legal period for which the data can be kept.
Glede na pomen varstva osebnih podatkov je bistveno, da se zadevno osebo obvesti o njenih pravicah glede dostopa, popravka in izbrisa podatkov o njej ter o najdaljšem zakonitem roku njihove hrambe.
In view of the importance of personal data protection, it is essential that the person concerned should be made aware of his rights regarding access to, rectification of and deletion of the data on him and of the maximum legal period for which such data can be kept.
(8a) Podatki, zbrani v okviru te direktive, se ne glede na njihovo začasno hrambo v nobenem primeru ne uporabljajo v druge namene, kot so tisti, ki omogočajo obravnavanje prekrškov v cestnem prometu.
(8a) Apart from the temporary nature of their storage, data collected under this Directive should not, under any circumstances, be used for purposes beyond what is required in order to follow up road safety offences.
Komisija in države članice morajo zato zagotoviti, da se pri obravnavanju osebnih podatkov in upravljanju omrežja izogne temu, da bi se zbrani podatki uporabljali v druge namene, kot je varnost v cestnem prometu.
The Commission and the Member States should accordingly ensure that the processing of personal data and the management of the Community electronic network will serve to prevent any data collected from being used for purposes other than those specifically related to road safety.
Pri obravnavanju osebnih podatkov in upravljanju omrežja je treba vzpostaviti varovala, da se izogne temu, da bi se zbrani podatki uporabljali v druge namene, kot je varnost v cestnem prometu.
Safeguards should be built into the processing of personal data and the management of the Community electronic network so as to prevent any data gathered from being used for purposes other than those specifically related to road safety.
(8b) Na področju nadzora cestnega prometa države članice uskladijo svoje metode, da so njihove prakse primerljive na ravni Unije.
( 8b ) As far as road safety controls are concerned, Member States should harmonise their methods so that their practices are comparable at EU level.
Vsaka država članica torej oblikuje minimalne standarde za izvajanje nadzora.
Minim um standards on control practices should thus be developed in each Member State.
Prakse glede nadzora varnosti v cestnem prometu v državah članicah je treba uskladiti, da se doseže boljše usklajevanje politik na tem področju na evropski ravni.
Road safety control practices should be harmonised between Member States in order to achieve a better coordination of policies in this area at EU level.
(8c) Tehnično opremo za nadzor varnosti v cestnem prometu je prav tako treba uskladiti, da se zagotovi skladnost ukrepov nadzora med državami članicami.
( 8c ) Technical equipment for r oad safety controls should also be harmonised in future in order to ensure the convergence of control measures between Member States.
Takšno tehnično uskladitev predlaga Komisija pri reviziji, ki jo predvideva člen 8a.
Technical harmonisation of this kind should be proposed by the Commission during the revision referred to in Article 8(a).
Komisija v okviru svojega poročila o izvajanju direktive predloži predloge za standardizacijo tehnične opreme, ki se uporablja na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu, na evropski ravni.
In its report on the implementation of the Directive, the Commission must make proposals with a view to standardising road safety equipment at European level.
(8d) Evropska komisija in države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za obveščenost in ozaveščenost državljanov EU glede izvajanja direktive.
( 8d ) The European Commission and Member States should take whatever measures are necessary to inform , and raise the awareness of , E U citizens as regards the implementation of this Directive.
Primerne informacije o posledicah neupoštevanja pravil na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu imajo lahko preventivni učinek.
Appropriate information on the consequences of a failure to comply with road safety rules may thus have a deterrent effect upstream on the commission of road traffic offence s . .
Obveščanje voznikov je osrednji element politike varnosti v cestnem prometu, ki mora delovati preventivno in odvračati voznike od tega, da storijo prometne prekrške.
Driver information is a key plank of road safety policy which must play a preventive and deterrent role as regards the commission of offences.
(8e) Komisija bi se morala v prihodnje osredotočiti na poenostavitev čezmejnega pregona v primerih resnih prometnih nesreč.
( 8 e ) The Commission should focus in the future on facilitating cross-border enforcement of road traffic infringements, in particular those related to serious traffic accidents.
Sedanji predlog vključuje le razmeroma lažje prekrške.
The current proposal only focuses on offences which, by and large, are of a relatively minor nature.
Predlog bi bilo treba razširiti, da bi se poenostavil pregon v primerih, ko so vozniki povzročili resne poškodbe ali škodo.
The proposal should be widened to enable easier enforcement of incidents involving drivers where serious injury or damage is caused.
(a) „imetnik“ pomeni imetnika potrdila o registraciji zadevnega vozila;
(a) "holder" means the holder of the registration certificate of the vehicle concerned;
(a) „imetnik“ pomeni imetnika potrdila o registraciji zadevnega vozila , vključno z motornimi kolesi ;
(a) "holder" means the holder of the registration certificate of the vehicle concerned, including motorcycles ;
(d) „pristojni organ“ pomeni organ, ki je pristojen za nacionalno zbirko podatkov o dokumentih za registracijo vozil ;
(d) "competent authority" means the authority in charge of the national database on the registration documents for vehicles.
(d) „pristojni organ“ pomeni eno kontaktno točko v vsaki državi članici, ki je odgovorna za olajšano izvajanje te direktive ;
(d) "competent authority" means a single contact point in each Member State responsible for facilitating the implementation of this Directive .
(da) „osrednji organ“ pomeni organ, ki je odgovoren za zagotavljanje varstva podatkov v vsaki državi članici;
(da) “central authority” means the authority responsible for ensuring data protection in each Member State;
(db) „končna upravna odločba“ pomeni vsako odločbo, v kateri se zahteva plačilo denarne kazni in ni končna odločba, ki sodi v okvir opredelitve iz člena 1 okvirnega sklepa 2005/214/PNZ;
(db) “Final Administrative Decision” means any final decision requiring a financial penalty to be paid, other than a final decision falling within the definition of Article 1 of Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA;
Za izvajanje politike varnosti v cestnem prometu, katere namen je visoka raven zaščite vseh uporabnikov cest v EU, in ob upoštevanju velike raznolikosti razmer v EU bi morale države članice brez poseganja v strožje politike in zakonodaje sprejeti ukrepe za oblikovanje najosnovnejšega niza smernic za varnost v cestnem prometu na področju uporabe te direktive.
With a view to pursuing a road safety policy aiming for a high level of protection for all road users in the EU and taking into account the widely differing circumstances within the EU, Member States should act, without prejudice to more restrictive policies and laws, in order to provide for a minim um set of road safety guidelines in the scope of this Directive.