natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
25. poudarja, da je treba okrepiti sekretariat odbora za izpolnitev potreb po jezikovnem, pravnem in političnem strokovnem znanju, saj bi s tem omogočili krajši odzivni čas, učinkovitejše preiskave in enako dostopnost storitev za vse državljane EU;
Underlines the need to strengthen the Committee's secretariat in order to cover the need for linguistic, legal and political expertise, so that response times may become shorter and investigations more effective, and so that the service which it provides may be equally available to all citizens of the EU;
28. opominja, da Evropski parlament od leta 1998 poziva k reviziji medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o okrepitvi pravice do peticije iz leta 1989
Recalls that, since 1998, the European Parliament has called for a review of the 1989 Interinstitutional Agreement on strengthening the right of petition
UL C 120, 12.4.1989, str.
OJ C 120, 12.4.1989, p.
90. ; ponovno poziva Svet in Komisijo k reviziji tega sporazuma, da se zagotovijo učinkovitejša pravna sredstva ter se določi jasnejši in skladnejši okvir bistvenega sodelovanja med institucijami na zadevnem področju;
90. ; reiterates its urgent requests for the Council and the Commission to undertake that review with a view to establishing a more effective means of redress and defining a clear and coherent framework for essential cooperation between the institutions in the area concerned;
To poročilo obravnava obdobje od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2006 in je bilo sestavljeno v skladu s členom 192 poslovnika, na podlagi katerega mora Odbor za peticije o svojih odločitvah obveščati Parlament.
The current report covers the period from 1 January to 31 December 2006 and has been drawn up pursuant to Rule 192 of the Rules of Procedure requiring the Committee on Petitions to inform Parliament of the outcome of its deliberations.
Kot je bilo dogovorjeno leta 2005, je to prvo poročilo, ki zajema dejavnosti Odbora za peticije v koledarskem letu (2006) in ne v parlamentarnem kot prej.
As agreed in 2005, this report is the first one to cover the activity of the Committee on Petitions during a calendar year (2006) and not a parliamentary one as before.
V poročilu bo torej mogoče oblikovati sklepe na podlagi vseh peticij, prejetih med letom, in tako ponuditi celovitejšo sliko o njihovem številu, vsebini in statusu (dopustne, nedopustne).
The Report will therefore be able draw its conclusions on the basis of all the petitions received during the year, thus offering a more comprehensive image about their number, content and status (admissible or inadmissible).
Statistični podatki kažejo, da se število peticij, prejetih v letu 2006, ni bistveno spremenilo (1032 leta 2005 v primerjavi s 1016 leta 2006), od tega pa je bila približno tretjina označenih za nedopustne.
Statistics shows that the number of petitions received during 2006 remained relatively constant (1032 in 2005 compared to 1016 in 2006), with about one third of them being declared inadmissible.
Glavna problematična področja za vlagatelje peticij so še vedno okolje in prosti pretok blaga, oseb in kapitala.
The main areas of concerns for petitioners remain environment and free movement of goods, persons and capitals.
Sodelovanje s Komisijo pri iskanju ustreznih rešitev glede peticij je še vedno zelo pomembno.
Cooperation with the Commission remains highly important in finding appropriate solutions to petitions.
Komisija v svojem 23. poročilu o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2006)0416 ) priznava pomembno vlogo postopka vlaganja peticij pri ugotavljanju kršitev.
The Commission's 23rd annual report on monitoring the application of Community law ( COM(2006)0416 ) acknowledges the role of the petitions procedure in identifying infringements.
V poročilu je dejansko navedeno, da je bila četrtina do tretjina peticij, ki jih je odbor prejel leta 2005, povezana s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, začetih proti državam članicam po členu 226 Pogodbe o EU.
The report indeed indicates that between one quarter and one third of petitions received by the Committee in 2005 are linked to or have given rise to infringement proceedings, initiated by the Commission against Member States under article 226 of the EU Treaty.
Vendar mine veliko časa od trenutka, ko je peticija poslana Evropski komisiji, do začetka in zaključka postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev, s tem pa se podaljša tudi čas, ko vlagatelj peticije dejansko dobi odgovor.
However, a considerable amount of time passes from the moment the petition is sent to the European Commission till the infringement procedure is initiated and concluded, thus postponing the moment when the petitioner would actually be in a position to obtain redress.
Odbor je nadaljeval dialog z evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic in temeljito obravnaval posebna poročila o evropskih šolah, o preglednosti sej Sveta in o tem, kako Komisija obravnava pritožbe o domnevnih kršitvah.
The Committee has continued its dialogue with the European Ombudsman and thoroughly considered the Special Reports on the European Schools, on the transparency of the Council meetings and on the way in which the Commission is handling complaints alleging an infringement.
Ugotovil je, da je vse večja uporaba posebnih poročil sredstvo za zaključevanje preiskav evropskega varuha človekovih pravic domnevnih nepravilnosti evropskih institucij.
The Committee took note of an increase use of Special Reports as a means by which to finalise European Ombudsman's inquiries into alleged maladministration by European institution.
Posebna pozornost je bila namenjena spremljanju posebnega poročila evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu v skladu z osnutkom priporočila Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam v pritožbi 2485/2004/GG.
Special attention was given to the follow up to the European Ombudsman's Special Report to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the European Anti-Fraud Office in complaint 2485/2004/GG.
Maja 2006 je v Strasbourgu potekala posebna seja.
A special meeting was organised in May 2006, in Strasbourg.
Odbor bo zaprosil za odobritev poročila, takoj ko bo Sodišče evropskih skupnosti izreklo sodbo.
The Committee would request authorisation for a Report as soon as the Court of Justice renders its ruling.
Sodelovanje z državami članicami in Svetom je treba še okrepiti, ker bi lahko bilo njihovo udejstvovanje v dejavnostih Odbora za peticije zelo koristno za lažje iskanje rešitev za peticije in hitrejše odpravljanje težav v posameznih primerih.
Cooperation with the Member States and the Council still needs to be reinforced as their participation in the activity of the Committee on Petitions could be extremely helpful in facilitating solutions to petitions and providing a faster remedy in individual cases.
Odbor in njegov sekretariat nenehno razmišljata o načinu, kako izboljšati kakovost postopkov za vlaganje peticij.
Ways in which to improve the quality of the petition process was, and still is, a constant matter of concern for the Committee and its Secretariat.
Poslanci so izrazili svojo popolno podporo povečanju članstva odbora, kot je bilo predlagano v Cashmanovem poročilu o obravnavah Odbora za peticije ( A6-0178/2006 ).
Members manifested their full support for the increase in the Committee's membership as proposed in the Cashman Report on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0178/2006 ).
Kljub nekaterim težavam se je sistem za e-peticije, namenjen izboljšanju preglednosti in časovnega razporeda v zvezi z upravljanjem peticij, še naprej razvijal in kaže, da se mu v obdobju 2007–2008 obeta nova stopnja.
Despite some difficulties, the E-petition system aimed at improving the transparency and the timing related to the management of petitions continued to develop and looks like entering a new stage in 2007-2008.
In nenazadnje so poslanci popolnoma soglašali, da je treba izvesti revizijo veljavnih pravil za postopek vlaganja peticij, da bi pojasnili, kako poteka ocenjevanje dopustnosti peticij, in okrepili postopke, povezane z varovanjem podatkov in zaupnostjo, ne da bi bila pri tem ogrožena nujna preglednost postopka za vlaganje peticij.
Last but not least, Members are in full agreement on the importance of conducting a review of the current rules governing the petitions procedure in order to provide clarification regarding the assessment of the admissibility of petitions, and to reinforce procedures related to data protection and confidentiality without undermining the essential transparency of the petitions process itself.
Pravica do vlaganja peticij, kot je navedeno v členih 21 in 194 Pogodbe o ES, je pomemben dejavnik evropskega državljanstva, saj vsakemu evropskemu državljanu ali vsaki fizični oziroma pravni osebi s stalnim prebivališčem ali registriranim sedežem v državi članici omogoča, da na Evropski parlament naslovi peticijo o zadevah, ki sodijo na področja delovanja EU.
The right of petitions, as enshrined in the EC Treaty under articles 21 and 194, is a significant feature of the European citizenship as it enables any European Union citizen, any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State to address the European Parliament on matters falling within the EU’s fields of activity.
Peticije se vlagajo brezplačno, in sicer v pisni obliki in v katerem koli uradnem jeziku EU.
Tabling petitions is free of any charge to the petitioner and can be done in writing, in any of the EU official languages via fax, regular mail and internet.
Vsebina tega zagotovila je obsežno opisana v členu 191, v katerem je jasno določeno, da se morajo peticije – da so dopustne – nanašati na vprašanja, "ki sodijo na področje delovanja Evropske unije in ki ga oziroma jo neposredno zadevajo" .
The substance of this guarantee is widely drawn up in Rule 191 which expressly states that to be admissible a petition must concern "a matter which comes within the European Union's fields of activity and which affects him, her or it (i.e. an association) directly" .
Vprašanje dopustnosti ne prejudicira stališča odbora o vsebini peticij in niti izida vsakršne razprave o zadevi.
The question of admissibility does not however prejudge the Committee's view on the substance of the petitions, nor does it prejudge the outcome of any deliberations on the matter.
Vendar pa odpira pot za pripravo razprave o točkah, ki so jih sprožile peticije, ali za vsakršno nadaljnje ukrepanje, za katero bi se odbor utegnil odločiti, kot je zahtevati od Komisije, da izvede predhodno preiskavo o zadevi, ali jo posreduje drugemu pristojnemu odboru za informacijo ali mnenje.
It does however open the way for the organisation of a debate on the points raised by the petition, or for any other alternative course of action which the Committee may decide, such as requesting the Commission to conduct a preliminary investigation into the matter, or forwarding to another competent committee for information or an opinion.
Kot del dela, začetega leta 2006 o pregledu Poslovnika za poenostavitev in pojasnitev nekaterih določb o peticijah, bo upoštevana možnost, da se podrobno opiše način ocenjevanja dopustnosti.
As part of the work initiated in 2006 on the review of the Rules of procedures in order to simplify and clarify certain provisions on petitions, consideration will be given to the opportunity of detailing the way admissibility is assessed.
V letu 2006 je Parlament prejel 1016 peticij, kar pomeni rahlo zmanjšanje v primerjavi z letom 2005, ko jih je bilo vloženih 1032.
During 2006, Parliament received 1016 petitions, a slight decrease compared to 2005 when 1032 petitions were tabled.
Kot leta 2005 je bila tudi leta 2006 tretjina prejetih peticij označena za nedopustne , ker niso sodile na področje delovanja EU.
As in 2005, in 2006 around one third of the petitions received were declared inadmissible , as they fell outside the area of activity of the EU.
Dve leti po širitvi EU na 25 članic kaže, da je število peticij stabilno (nekaj nad 1000), najdejavnejši pa so nemški, britanski, španski, grški, francoski, italijanski in poljski državljani.
Two years after EU enlargement to 25 members, the number of petitions seems to be stable, slightly above 1000 with German, British, Spanish, Greek, French, Italian and Polish nationals being the most active.
Z razširitvijo EU na Romunijo in Bolgarijo leta 2007 bo odbor po vsej verjetnosti prejel precej večje število peticij iz teh držav.
EU enlargement to include Romania and Bulgaria in 2007 will probably result in the Committee receiving a considerable number of petitions from the two countries.
Peticije dajejo pomembno sliko o uporabi evropske zakonodaje in o tem, kako vpliva na posameznike.
Petitions offer an important image about the application of the European legislation and the impact it has on individuals.
S peticijami lahko evropski državljani opozarjajo na pomanjkljivosti in težave pri postopku prenosa in uporabe in tako najbolje spremljajo izvajanje zakonodaje EU na nacionalni ravni.
Through their petitions, European citizens point out the shortcomings and difficulties of the transposition and application process and remain best placed to monitor the implementation of the EU legislation at national level.
Večina peticij opozarja na težave pri izvajanju zakonodaje ES, zlasti o okolju, socialni varnosti, priznavanju diplom in drugih vidikov, povezanih z delovanjem notranjega trga.
Most of the petitions point to difficulties related to the implementation of EC legislation in the fields of environment, social security, recognition of diplomas, and other aspects related to the functioning of the internal market.
Najpomembnejša dela zakonodaje EU sta bila Direktiva 85/337/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z 97/11/ES in 2003/35/ES o oceni vpliva na okolje, in Direktiva 2003/4/ES o dostopu javnosti do informacij o okolju.
The most concerned pieces of EU legislation were Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC on Environmental Impact Assessment and Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information.
Zaradi znatnega števila peticij, prejetih iz Združenega kraljestva, Nemčije in Irske o velikih finančnih izgubah, ki so posledica domnevnega slabega upravljanja družbe „Equitable Life Assurance Society“, je Evropski parlament ustanovil začasni preiskovalni odbor za preiskavo domnevnih kršitev ali nepravilnosti pri izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti (člen 193 Pogodbe o ES).
The significant number of petitions received from United Kingdom, Germany and Ireland on major financial losses incurred following alleged mismanagement at Equitable Life resulted in the European Parliament setting up a temporary committee of inquiry to investigate "alleged contraventions or maladministration in the implementation of Community law" (Article 193 of the EC Treaty).
Člani Odbora za peticije bodo sodelovali pri delu tega odbora, ki bo leta 2007 predstavil poročilo o svojih izsledkih.
Members of the Committee on Petitions will participate the work of the Committee of inquiries which will present a report on its findings in 2007.
Znatno število peticij se nanaša na spoštovanje temeljnih pravic v državah članicah in izraža stališča državljanov o dejavnostih EU.
A significant number of petitions refer to respect of fundamental rights in the Member States and express citizens' views or opinions about EU activities.
Večino vlagateljev peticij se spodbuja, da uporabijo pravna sredstva na nacionalni ravni in da po tem, ko so izrabili vse možnosti za pritožbo, razmislijo o možnosti, da svoj primer predložijo Evropskemu sodišču za človekove pravice v Strasbourgu.
Most of these petitioners are encouraged to avail themselves of the legal remedies existing at national level and after exhausting all ways of appeal to consider the possibility of bringing their case before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
Delež nedopustnih peticij kaže na nenehno potrebo po širjenju javne ozaveščenosti in po učinkovitejšem seznanjanju evropskih državljanov z zakonodajo in politikami EU ter njihovo legitimno pravico do naslavljanja peticij na Evropski parlament.
The proportion of inadmissible petitions indicates a continuous need to raise public awareness and better inform European citizens about EU legislation and policies, as well as about their legitimate right to petition the European Parliament.
Odnosi s Komisijo
Relations with the Commission
Evropska komisija in Odbor za peticije sta zaradi narave svojega dela – odbor kot sredstvo, preko katerega lahko državljani opozorijo na kršitve evropske zakonodaje, ki neposredno zadevajo njihove interese, in Komisija zaradi svoje vloge pri spremljanju prenosa in izvajanja te zakonodaje – naravna partnerja pri obravnavanju tovrstnih primerov.
Given the very substance of the activity of the Committee on Petitions as a vehicle allowing individual citizens to signal breaches of EC legislation directly affecting their interests and the role of the European Commission in monitoring the transposition and implementation of European law, the two remain natural partners in addressing such situations.
Odbor za peticije se zanaša na strokovno znanje Evropske komisije pri raziskovanju potencialnih kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki jih razkrijejo peticije.
The Committee on Petitions relies on the European Commission's expertise in investigating potential breaches of Community legislation brought to light via petitions.
Priporočila Komisije pripomorejo k opredeljevanju najustreznejšega odziva na težave vlagateljev peticij.
Commission's recommendations remain instrumental in defining the most appropriate answer to petitioners' problems.
Vendar odbor vedno spodbuja Komisijo, naj se izogiba standardnim in splošnim odzivom zaradi ozke razlage svojih pristojnosti in informacij, dobljenih od držav članic.
Nevertheless, the Committee kept encouraging the Commission to avoid standard and rather general answers based on a strict interpretation of its competencies and on the information provided by the Member States.
Odbor za peticije poudarja, da je treba peticije vrednotiti problemsko, in poziva Komisijo, naj izvaja neodvisne raziskave, ki bi omogočile skladen pristop k specifičnim vprašanjem.
The Committee on Petitions continued to emphasise the need for more problem-focussed assessments of the petitions and to ask the European Commission to carry out independent investigations which may allow for more a more coherent approach to specific issues.
Po številnih pozivih Komisiji, naj prizna večjo veljavo peticijam pri razkrivanju možnih kršitev, odbor z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je v svojem 23. letnem poročilu o nadzoru nad izvajanjem zakonodaje Skupnosti poročala, da je bila četrtina do tretjina peticij, ki jih je odbor prejel leta 2005, povezana s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, začetih proti državam članicam po členu 226 Pogodbe o EU, ali je do njih privedla.
Following a number of calls on the Commission to better acknowledge the importance of the petitions in revealing potential infringements, the Committee notes with satisfaction that its 23rd Annual report on monitoring the application of Community law, the Commission indicates that between one quarter and one third of petitions received by the Committee in 2005 are linked to or have given rise to infringement proceedings initiated against Member States under article 226 of the EU Treaty.
To zadovoljstvo pa zmanjšujeta dva pomembna pomisleka.
Such satisfaction is however strongly attenuated by two important considerations.
Prvič, do sprožitve postopka po členu 226 je trajalo zelo dolgo – ponavadi cela leta oziroma po besedah Komisije povprečno 35 mesecev.
The first is that to reach the stage of even opening an article 226 procedure an enormous amount of time has been taken up - usually counted in years or as the Commission says, 35 months on average.
Drugič, četudi je postopek za ugotavljanje kršitve uspešen – bodisi zato, ker se država članica prostovoljno odloči v celoti delovati skladno z direktivo, bodisi zaradi odločbe Sodišča evropskih skupnosti –, od tega vlagatelj peticije pogosto nima nobene neposredne koristi.
The second is that even when an infringement case is won - either by the voluntary compliance of the Member State to act in full conformity with a given Directive, or by means of a decision of the European Court of Justice, this is often of no direct benefit to the individual petitioner.
To namreč velja za vlagatelje peticij v zvezi z družbo Lloyd's in lektorji za tuji jezik na italijanskih univerzah, če navedemo samo dva zgleda, omenjena v poročilu Komisije.
This has notably been the case for the Lloyd's Names' Petitioners and the Foreign Language lecturers "lettori" Petitioners, to cite but two examples mentioned in passing in the Commission's report.
Poleg tega Komisija čedalje bolj stremi k temu, kar imenuje „horizontalni“ postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državam članicam.
Moreover, the Commission is increasingly drawn towards using what it has called "horizontal" infringement proceedings against Member States.
Tako napravi zato, da lahko več, včasih na desetine, prijavljenih kršitev spravi v skupen paket, o čemer nato razpravlja z zadevno državo članico, da bi dosegli skladnost.
It does so in order to regroup several, sometimes dozens of infringement cases into a global package which it then discusses with the Member State concerned with a view to obtaining compliance.
V upravnem pogledu je to zelo pripravno, saj je za pogajanja o zadevi nedvomno potrebno dosti manj osebja, vendar za vlagatelja peticije, ki čaka na rešitev svoje težave, takšni horizontalni postopki stvari poslabšujejo, saj kažejo nezmožnost Parlamenta za reševanje problemov in spodkopavajo zaupanje vlagatelja v splošno koristnost EU.
Although this is of course very convenient in administrative terms as it no doubt requires fewer personnel to negotiate such matters, for the petitioner who is awaiting a resolution of his problem such horizontal procedures exacerbate the matter by demonstrating the inability of Parliament to provide a solution and undermining his confidence in the EU's ability to be of any use whatsoever.
Ob upoštevanju omenjenega je odbor v dialogu s Komisijo nenehno poudarjal vlogo peticij pri doseganju skupnega cilja – približati Evropo državljanom – in kljub poznavanju številnih razlogov za zamude pri odzivanju Komisije na peticije vztrajal pri tem, da so potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi za povečanje preglednosti njenih ocen in hitrosti odgovorov na peticije.
Considering all the above, in its dialogue with the European Commission, the Committee has relentlessly underlined the role of petitions in achieving the common goal of bringing Europe closer to citizens and insisted that, although fully aware of the many reasons delaying Commission's replies to petitions, further measures are necessary to improve the transparency of its assessments and the promptness of its answers to petitioners.
Odbor za peticije in evropski varuh človekovih pravic
Committee on Petitions and the European Ombudsman
Odbor za peticije in evropski varuh človekovih pravic sta delovala v konstruktivnem razmerju na podlagi stalnega dialoga in vzajemnega spoštovanja pristojnosti in pravic.
The Committee on Petitions and the European Ombudsman carried on a constructive relationship based on constant dialogue and mutual respect of each other competences and prerogatives.
V Schwabovem poročilu o letnem poročilu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic leta 2005 ( 2006/2117(INI) ) je bila poudarjena vloga varuha človekovih pravic pri spodbujanju odprtosti in odgovornosti v postopkih odločanja in upravljanju Evropske unije ter njegov prispevek k preglednejšemu delu evropskih institucij.
The Schwab Report on the Annual Report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2005 ( 2006/2117(INI) ) points out the role of the Ombudsman in enhancing openness and accountability in the decision-making processes and administration of the European Union and its contribution to the transparency of the work of the European institutions.
Leta 2006 je varuh človekovih pravic odboru predstavil dve novi posebni poročili:
In 2006, the Ombudsman presented two new Special Reports to the Committee: