natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
M. ker so splošni predpisi o strukturnih skladih in začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe bistveno povečali pomen teritorialnega sodelovanja,
M. whereas the basic regulation governing the Structural Funds and the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty have considerably increased the importance accorded to territorial cooperation,
N. ker je naknadno vrednotenje programov INTERREG III za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 jasno dokazalo dodano vrednost tega cilja za evropski projekt,
N. whereas the ex-post evaluation of the INTERREG III programmes for the 2000-2006 programming period offers conclusive proof of the added value of this objective for the European project,
Krepiti cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja
Strengthening the ‘territorial cooperation’ objective
3. poudarja, da cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja, ki temelji na načelu gospodarske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije, zadeva vse regije EU, saj prispeva k spodbujanju usklajenega razvoja Unije kot celote;
Stresses that the objective of territorial cooperation, based on the principle of economic, social and territorial cohesion, concerns all the EU's regions in that it helps to promote the harmonious development of the Union as a whole;
6. meni, da je treba v primeru nadaljnje ločitve med čezmejnim sklopom (sklop A), ki je vezan na lokalne potrebe življenja ob meji, in transnacionalnim sklopom (sklop B), vključno s t. i. makroregionalno razsežnostjo, ki omogoča sodelovanje na širših strateških osnovah, izboljšati usklajevanje med obema sklopoma;
Considers that, if a distinction should continue to be made between the cross-border component (component A), which meets the local needs of cross-border population catchment areas, and the transnational component (component B), including the so-called macroregional scale, which facilitates cooperation over wider strategic areas, better coordination between the two components is needed;
8. kljub temu meni, da vključevanje tovrstnih regij in njihova odprtost proti geografskim območjem izven EU ni in ne sme biti zgolj vprašanje njihove geografske oddaljenosti, saj jim bogastvo zgodovinskih, jezikovnih in kulturnih vezi z različnimi deli sveta dodeljuje privilegiran položaj na področju poglabljanja tovrstnih odnosov, kar je v korist globalni prisotnosti EU;
Considers, nonetheless, that the integration of such regions with and their opening up to geographical areas outside the EU is not and cannot be simply a function of their geographical remoteness, as the wealth of historical, linguistic and cultural bonds linking them to various parts of the world gives them a key role to play in the deepening of such relations, to the benefit of the EU's global presence;
10. poziva, naj se sredstva za vsak posamezen program teritorialnega sodelovanja dodeljujejo na podlagi usklajenih meril, da bi zagotovili strateški in celovit odziv na potrebe in posebnosti vsakega ozemlja in območja sodelovanja; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o drugih ustreznih, strateških in merljivih merilih, ki bi lahko odražala potrebe ozemlja, ne da bi zmanjšali težo najpomembnejšega, tj. demografskega merila;
Calls for funds to be allocated for each programme of territorial cooperation on the basis of harmonised criteria so as to provide a strategic, integrated response to the needs and specificities of each territory or area involved; invites in this respect the Commission and the Member States to consider other relevant, strategic and measurable criteria that could reflect the needs of territories without undermining the most important criterion: demography;
Člen 37(6)(b). ; priporoča, naj medregionalni sklop cilja 3 pokriva tudi usklajevanje in izvajanje teh projektov, ovrednotenje znanja in izmenjavo dobrih praks;
Article 37(6)(b) ; advocates, therefore, that the ‘interregional’ component of Objective 3 should also cover the coordination and running of such projects, the pooling of know-how and the exchange of good practices;
15. se veseli uspeha programa URBACT na področju trajnostnega urbanega razvoja in poziva k njegovemu podaljšanju ter razširitvi v pomembno in široko dostopno pobudo, ki bi zagotavljala možnosti za skupno učenje in prenosljivost v zvezi z lokalnimi urbanimi izzivi;
Welcomes the success of the URBACT sustainable urban development programme and calls for its renewal and expansion into a significant and widely accessible initiative to offer opportunities for shared learning and transferability with regard to local urban challenges;
Uskladiti teritorialno sodelovanje
Mainstreaming territorial cooperation
19. spodbuja države članice in regije, naj oblikujejo večregionalne operativne programe, prilagojene skupnim ozemeljskim problematikam, kot je skupno gorovje ali povodje, ki ozemlju dajejo skupen značaj;
Encourages the Member States and regions to set up multi-regional operational programmes to address common territorial problems; such as the presence of a mountain range or a river basin which characterises the territory;
Sprejeti teritorialni pristop za druge politike Skupnosti
Adopting a territorial approach in implementing other EU polic ie s
24. zahteva, naj Komisija natančno preuči rezultate izvajanja prvih makroregionalnih strategij; meni, da je postopek vzbudil interes, ki ga je treba izkoristiti in pridobljene izkušnje uporabiti pri izvajanju novih makroregionalnih strategij;
Asks the Commission to conduct an in-depth study of the results of the first macro-regional strategies implemented; believes that the process has met with a level of interest that should be built on, with lessons being learnt for the implementation of future new macro-regional strategies;
29. meni, da mora vsaka nadnacionalna strategija v svoja stališča vključiti možnost usklajevanja s smernicami vseevropskih prometnih omrežij ter s strategijami v okviru celostne pomorske politike;
Believes that any transnational strategy must take due account of the scope of coordination with the trans-European transport network guidelines and the strategies pursued under the integrated maritime policy;
32. poziva k izvajanju Akcijskega načrta za širše sosedstvo za najbolj oddaljene regije EU, kot je napovedala Komisije v svojem sporočilu KOM(2004)0343 ; poudarja, da je v tem smislu potrebno skladno večsektorsko delovanje v politikah Unije, ki zadevajo najbolj oddaljene regije, zlasti boljše usklajevanje med zunanjim in notranjim sklopom, in sicer s sprejetjem območne strategije;
Calls for implementation of the Wider Neighbourhood Action Plan for the EU’s outermost regions, announced in Commission Communication COM(2004) 343; stresses, therefore, the need for coherent multisectoral action in areas of EU policy concerning the outermost regions and, in particular, for internal and external components to be coordinated more effectively by means of a catchment area strategy;
Spodbujati ustanovitev evropskih združenj za teritorialno sodelovanje (EZTS)
Facilitating the establishment of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs)
– pojasnil status EZTS v pravnih sistemih držav članic, da bi lahko v zvezi s tem dosegli ustrezno pravno usklajenost;
– clarifying the status of EGTC under the legal systems of the Member States in order to achieve an appropriate legal alignment in this respect,
– omogočilo ustanavljanje EZTS med zainteresiranimi stranmi v državi članici in tretji državi;
– allowing EGTCs to be established by stakeholders based in a Member State and in a third country,
– preoblikoval člen 4(3), da bi se strogo spoštoval trimesečni rok za obravnavo vlog za ustanovitev EZTS;
– redrafting Article 4(3) to ensure stricter compliance with the three-month deadline for the processing of applications to set up an EGTC,
– poenostavili kadrovski predpisi;
– simplifying the laws governing staffing,
– zagotovilo, da davčna ureditev za EZTS ne bi bila slabša kot za druge pravne statuse v okviru izvajanja projektov ali programov sodelovanja;
– ensuring that the tax rules for EGTCs are no less favourable than other legal arrangements governing the implementation of cooperation projects or programmes;
Poenostaviti izvajanje
Simplifying implementation
47. obžaluje, ker teritorialno sodelovanje ni dovolj znano na ravni nacionalnih in lokalnih uprav ter med državljani, zato poziva k bolj učinkovitemu obveščanju o zaključenih projektih;
Deplores the low profile of territorial cooperation, in the eyes of both national and local authorities and the general public, and therefore calls for more effective communication on completed projects;
51 . poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju med upravnimi organi in obstoječimi čezmejnimi institucijami, kot so evroregije, ob izvajanju čezmejnih programov, da bi zagotovili projekte visoke kakovosti, ki bodo pregledni in blizu državljanom;
Calls for better coordination between managing authorities and already existing cross-border institutions like Euroregions during the implementation of cross-border programmes so as to guarantee for projects a high level of quality, transparency and closeness to the citizen;
V zadnjih petih letih so splošni predpisi o strukturnih skladih in začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe bistveno povečali pomen teritorialnega sodelovanja.
Over the last five years, changes to the basic regulation governing the Structural Funds and the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty have substantially enhanced the importance of territorial cooperation.
Finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 je cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja označil za enega izmed treh stebrov politične kohezije Evropske unije, ki je nasledil nekdanjo pobudo Skupnosti INTERREG.
The multiannual financial framework for the period 2007-2013 turned the 'territorial cooperation' objective into one of the three pillars of the EU's cohesion policy, replacing the INTERREG Community initiative.
Pozneje je teritorialna kohezija, skupaj s socialno in ekonomsko, v členu 174 Pogodbe postala eden izmed treh sestavnih delov kohezijske politike.
Since then, 'territorial cohesion' has become, under Article 174 of the Treaty, one of the three components of cohesion policy, alongside economic and social cohesion.
S tem se je utrdil njen položaj kot ene glavnih prednostnih nalog Evropske unije.
'Territorial cohesion' is now firmly established as one of the European Union's main priorities.
Cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja je po mnenju poročevalke odstraniti fizične, upravne in zakonodajne ovire med območji in regijami ter zmanjšati učinek meja, da bi se regijam omogočilo skupno odzivanje na skupne izzive, ki so lahko teritorialni (storitve, infrastruktura, prostorsko načrtovanje in urejanje), globalni (globalizacija, podnebne spremembe), ekonomski ali socialni.
In your rapporteur's view, the aim of 'territorial cooperation' is to do away with physical, administrative and regulatory obstacles to cohesion and to reduce the 'border effect' between territories and regions in order to enable them to address their shared challenges together, whether those challenges are territorial (services, infrastructure, urban and regional planning), global (globalisation, climate change), economic or societal.
V njem se skriva konkurenčnost, ki ni še dovolj izkoriščena, ter sodeluje pri vse tesnejši povezanosti med narodi.
'Territorial cooperation' represents a source of competitiveness which has not yet been properly exploited, one which can help us achieve the objective of 'an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe'.
Poročilo o naknadnem vrednotenju INTERREG III (2000-2006) jasno dokazuje dodano vrednost tega cilja za evropski projekt ter navaja nekaj uspešnih primerov: 1030 projektov za infrastrukture ter več kot 18 000 km novih cest ali cest, za katere so bila dodeljena sredstva, 115 200 novih delovnih mest, 5800 na novo zagnanih in drugih neposredno ali posredno ustanovljenih ali ohranjenih podjetij, skoraj 12 000 oblikovanih omrežij in struktur sodelovanja ter več kot 544 000 ljudi (vključno s študenti), ki so se udeležili tečajev, usposabljanj, seminarjev, delavnic, srečanj in drugih izobraževalnih dejavnosti
The INTERREG III ex-post evaluation report for the period 2000-2006 offers convincing evidence of the added value which that objective generates for the European integration process and gives some examples of its successes: 1030 infrastructure projects and more than 18 000 km of roads built or funded, 115 200 job opportunities created, 5800 start-ups and businesses directly or indirectly established or safeguarded, almost 12 000 cooperation networks and structures brought into being, and attendance by more than 544 000 persons (including students) at courses, training programmes, seminars, workshops, meetings or other educational activities
Pobuda Skupnosti INTERREG III (2000–2006); naknadno vrednotenje (št. 2008.CE.16.0.AT.016) .
INTERREG III Community Initiative (2000-2006) Ex-Post Evaluation (No 2008.CE.16.0.AT.016). .
Krepiti cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja
Strengthening the 'territorial cooperation' objective
Ambiciozen proračun
An ambitious budget
Poročevalka meni, da mora biti cilj 3 v skladu s stališčem Evropskega parlamenta, izraženim v njegovi resoluciji z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o kohezijski in regionalni politiki Evropske unije po letu 2013, stališčem Evropske komisije, razvidnim iz sklepov petega poročila o kohezijski politiki, priporočili Odbora regij ter sklepi neformalnega Sveta ministrov, zadolženih za regionalno politiko, v Liègu 22. in 23. novembra 2011, močno okrepljen.
In keeping with the position adopted by Parliament in its resolution of 7 October 2010 on the European Union's cohesion policy and regional policy after 2013, with the standpoint expressed by the Commission in the conclusions contained in the fifth report on cohesion policy, with the recommendations of the Committee of the Regions, and with the conclusions of the informal Council of Ministers for Regional Policy held in Liege on 22 and 23 November 2010, your rapporteur takes the view that 'Objective 3' must be substantially strengthened.
Sedanji večletni finančni okvir namenja temu cilju 8,5 milijard EUR (kar je le 2,5 % strukturnih odhodkov EU).
The current multiannual financial Framework allocates EUR 8.5 billion to that objective (a figure which represents only 2.5% of total EU structural spending).
Med pogajanji za prejšnje programsko obdobje je Komisija zahtevala, naj bo cilju 3 namenjenih najmanj 5 % proračuna za kohezijsko politiko.
During the negotiations concerning the previous programming period, the Commission had called for Objective 3 to account for at least 5% of the cohesion policy budget.
Leta 2013 bo ta cilj dozorel.
In 2013, that objective will reach maturity.
Zahteva po sodelovanju je močna, potrebe pa zelo velike.
The demand for cooperation is strong and the needs are immense.
Poročevalka meni, da mora Evropski parlament podpreti ambicije akterjev teritorialnega sodelovanja tako, da ponovno zahteva za ta cilj najmanj 7 % celotnega proračuna za kohezijsko politiko.
Your rapporteur takes the view that Parliament must support the ambitions of territorial cooperation stakeholders by urging once again that this objective should account for at least 7% of the overall cohesion policy budget.
Stabilna struktura
A stable architecture
Mnenje poročevalke je, da mora struktura tega cilja ohraniti tri sklope, saj ima vsak svojo logiko in uporabnost.
In your rapporteur's view, this objective must continue to be split into three components, each with its own logic and value.
Čezmejno sodelovanje (73 % proračuna) financira izvajanje skupnih strategij za regije ob notranjih mejah (včasih tudi zunanjih) držav članic (ki med seboj niso oddaljene več kot 150 kilometrov).
Cross-border cooperation (73% of the budget) provides funding for the implementation of joint strategies for the regions which are situated along the Member States' internal (and sometimes external) borders and not at a distance of more than 150 km from each other.
To izvajanje je omejeno na ozemlje na ravni NUTS 3 in ustreza lokalnim potrebam obmejnih območij.
Its implementation is 'territorialised' at NUTS 3 level and meets the local needs of cross-border regions.
Poročevalka meni, da bi razprava o upravičenem prenosu na raven NUTS 2, kot to zahtevajo nekateri akterji, lahko ogrozila to lokalno razsežnost čezmejnega sodelovanja.
Your rapporteur takes the view that a debate on a transfer of eligibility to NUTS 2 level, as called for by certain stakeholders, might undermine the local dimension to cross-border cooperation.
Glede na potrebe projektov pa izkoriščanje možnosti, ki jih daje člen 21 uredbe o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj glede lokacije projekta v okviru čezmejnega in transnacionalnega sodelovanja, omogoča fleksibilnost, ki jo je treba spodbujati.
However, depending on the nature of the projects concerned use of the scope offered by Article 21 of the ERDF Regulation as regards the location of cross-border and transnational cooperation activities offers a degree of flexibility which should be encouraged.
V nekaterih utemeljenih primerih ta člen omogoča financiranje izdatkov zunaj območja upravičenosti programa.
In duly substantiated cases, that article provides for the funding of expenditure incurred outside the area eligible under the programme.
Transnacionalno sodelovanje (20 % proračuna) na širši ravni je namenjeno spodbujanju sodelovanja med sosednjimi regijami, ki pripadajo istemu geografskem območju, pri strateških prednostnih nalogah Unije, kot so raziskave in razvoj, informacijska družba, okolje, visokošolsko izobraževanje, mobilnost in trajnostni urbani razvoj ter upravljanje naravnih nesreč.
Transnational cooperation (20% of the budget), which is carried out on a larger scale, seeks to promote cooperation between neighbouring regions belonging to the same geographical area with the aim of achieving the Union's strategic priorities in areas such as research and development, the information society, the environment, higher education, mobility, sustainable urban development and the management of natural disasters.
Medregionalno sodelovanje (4 % proračuna) obsega sodelovanje med vsemi regijami 27 držav članic ne glede na njihov geografski položaj in je namenjeno izmenjavi informacij, izkušenj ter dobrih praks.
Finally, interregional cooperation (4% of the budget) concerns cooperation among all the regions of the 27 Member States, regardless of their geographical location, and focuses on exchanges of information, experience and good practices.
Ta razkorak lahko povzroči dodatno administrativno breme za upravni organ ter malodušnost in razočaranje med kandidati.
This mismatch can create an excessive administrative workload for the managing authority and leave candidates feeling discouraged and frustrated.
Da bi varčevali ter povečali kakovost projektov, bi lahko predvideli ponovni premislek o zgornji meji deleža sofinanciranja EU za sodelujoče iz regij, katerih cilj je konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje.
With a view to making savings and improving the quality of projects, a reconsideration of the EU co-financing rate limit could be envisaged for participants from 'competitiveness and employment' regions.
Medregionalni sklop cilja "teritorialno sodelovanje" lahko služi kot opora, pomaga pri usklajevanju, pri najboljšem možnem izkoristku, izmenjavi dobrih praks in strateškem širjenju tako izvajanih projektov.
The interregional component of the 'territorial cooperation' objective can provide support, coordination, pooling of know-how, exchanges of good practices and strategic back-up for projects implemented in this way.
INTERACT bi postal bolj učinkovit, če bi bil bolj prilagojen in tesneje povezan s tem sklopom.
INTERACT would gain in effectiveness if it were involved more closely with the implementation of this component.
URBACT II (izmenjava informacij, ki spodbujajo trajnostni urbani razvoj) je kar uspešen in zasluži podaljšanje.
URBACT II (which concerns exchanges of information with a view to fostering sustainable urban development) has been fairly successful and should be continued.
Poleg tega bi bilo (v povezavi z razpravo o Erasmusu za lokalne politike) treba razširiti mrežo za izmenjavo politikov (medregionalno sodelovanje/INTERACT in URBACT), da bi ta izmenjava postala bolj prepoznavna in bi jim dala politični zagon.
In addition, in the context of the debate on the Erasmus programme for local councillors, these exchange networks (INTERACT/interregional cooperation and URBACT) should involve such representatives more closely, with a view to raising the profile of and lending fresh political impetus to these exchanges.
To bi lahko bil prvi korak k izvajanju projekta Erasmus za predstavnike, izvoljene na lokalnih in regionalnih volitvah.
This could be a first step to implement the Erasmus project for local and regional elected representatives;
Program ESPON, ki daje na voljo študije in baze podatkov o teritorialnem sodelovanju in obmejnih območjih, je učinkovit instrument.
The ESPON programme, which deals with the provision of studies and databases on territorial cooperation and border areas, is an effective instrument.
Vendar si je treba prizadevati za boljši dostop in večjo prepoznavnost njegovih rezultatov med vsemi akterji sodelovanja.
However, efforts are needed to make its results more visible and more accessible to all cooperation stakeholders.
Bolj strateško in celostno vključevanje teritorialnega sodelovanja
More strategic, mainstreamed territorial cooperation
Razmerja med temi tremi sklopi je v splošnem mogoče ohraniti, vendar mora biti organizacija bolj strateška in vključena v vse faze načrtovanja.
Although the current distribution of funding between the three components can essentially be maintained, programming must be more strategic and take place at all planning stages.
Poročevalka bi rada, da so vsi ukrepi sodelovanja na vseh ravneh upravljanja usklajeni ter povezani s strategijo Evropa 2020, ki je prilagojena potrebam ozemlja, ter z drugimi obstoječimi teritorialnimi strategijami (evropski okraji, evroregije, makroregije,...).
Your rapporteur would like to see cooperation measures coordinated at all levels of governance, in conjunction with a ‘Europe 2020’ strategy geared to the needs of territories and with the other existing territorial strategies (euro districts, Euroregions, macro-regions, etc.).
Teritorialno sodelovanje včasih ovirajo nacionalni finančni interesi ter sindrom „I want my money back“, v skladu s katerim si države članice in izvajalci razdelijo sredstva, dodeljena za projekte na njihovem ozemlju, brez dejanskega sodelovanja ali evropske dodane vrednosti.
Territorial cooperation is sometimes hampered by national considerations which reflect the ‘I want my money back’ syndrome: Member States and stakeholders share funding for projects on their territory, but without genuine cooperation or genuine European added value.
Poročevalka torej predlaga, naj se sredstva dodeljujejo za vsak program teritorialnega sodelovanja posebej, da se celovito zadovolji potrebam vsakega območja sodelovanja.
Your rapporteur is proposing, therefore, that budgets should be allocated for each territorial cooperation programme, with a view to meeting the needs of the area concerned in an integrated manner.
Kljub ohranitvi demografije kot glavnega merila lahko Komisija razmisli o drugih strateških, merljivih in ustreznih merilih, ki bodo odražala potrebe ozemlja, ne da bi ogrozila demografijo kot najpomembnejše merilo.
Whilst retaining the main criterion (demography), the Commission might consider other strategic, measurable and relevant criteria which would reflect the needs of territories and without undermining the most important criterion: demography.
Dodatni kazalci bi lahko upoštevali specifične težave teritorialnega sodelovanja, kot so povezljivost, dostop do infrastrukture, ali nekatere od kazalcev, vezane na strategijo Evropa 2020.
The additional indicators could take account of issues specific to territorial cooperation, such as connectivity and access to infrastructure, also to indicators linked to the Europe 2020 strategy.