natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija je z namenom analize napredka, doseženega na tem področju, in navedbe prihodnjih glavnih izzivov 14. novembra 2006 sprejela sporočilo Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o Strateškem pregledu boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0689 končno)
On 14 November 2006, with a view to analysing progress achieved in this area and to mapping out the main challenges ahead, the Commission adopted a Communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning a "Strategic Review of Better Regulation in the European Union" (COM(2006) 689 final)
Sporočilu sta priložena dva dokumenta o poenostavitvi zakonodajnega okolja (KOM(2006) 690 končno) in o merjenju upravnih stroškov in zmanjšanju upravnih obremenitev (KOM(2006) 691 končno), ki bosta predmet dveh ločenih poročil na lastno pobudo. ,
The Communication is accompanied by two documents on the simplification of the regulatory environment (COM(2006) 690 final) and on measuring and reducing administrative costs (COM(2006) 691 final) which will be the object of two separate own-initiative reports. .
Po opisu sedanjega položaja dokument poudarja napredek, ki ga je treba doseči na evropski ravni in na ravni držav članic.
After describing the current situation, the document points out the progress to be made both at European level and at level of Member States.
Zlasti mora Evropska komisija zagotoviti posodobljen program poenostavitve s ciljem zmanjšati upravne obremenitve in krepiti spremljanje ocen učinka z uvedbo neodvisnega odbora za oceno učinka pod vodstvom predsednika Komisije.
In particular, the European Commission should provide an updated simplification programme, aimed at reducing administrative burdens and reinforcing the scrutiny of impact assessments through the creation of an independent Impact Assessment Board under the authority of the President.
Komisija bo prav tako začela splošno krepitev izvrševanja zakonodaje Skupnosti z bolj preventivnimi ukrepi in države članice od vsega začetka spremljala, da se omogoči pravilen prenos ključnih direktiv.
The Commission will also embark on a general strengthening of the enforcement of Community law through more preventive action, following-up with Member States at an early stage so as to facilitate the correct transposition of key directives.
Svet in Evropski parlament bi morala zagotoviti bolj sistematične ocene učinka glavnih predlogov sprememb k predlogom Komisije ter dati večjo prednost predlogom za poenostavitev, ki so v obravnavi, kodifikaciji in razveljavitvi zastarele zakonodaje.
The Council and the European Parliament should provide more systematic impact assessments of major amendments to Commission proposals and give higher priority to pending simplification proposals, to codification and to repeal of obsolete legislation.
Države članice bi morale razviti in izvrševati mehanizme posvetovanja in programe poenostavitve, kadar manjkajo, ter bi morale spodbujati bolj sistematično oceno gospodarskih, socialnih in okoljskih učinkov, skupaj z izboljšano uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Member States should develop and enforce consultation mechanisms and simplification programmes, where missing, and foster a more systematic assessment of economic, social and environmental impacts, along with an improved application of Community law.
Končno, Evropska unija in države članice morajo začeti ambiciozno strategijo za zmanjšanje upravnih obremenitev.
Finally, both the European Union and Member States should embark on an ambitious strategy for reducing administrative burdens.
Ker upravne obremenitve izhajajo iz evropske in nacionalne zakonodaje, Komisija predlaga, da Evropski svet spomladi 2007 določi, da mora biti skupni cilj zmanjšanja upravnih obremenitev v višini 25 % dosežen do leta 2012.
Given that administrative burdens originate both in European and national legislation, the Commission proposes that the Spring 2007 European Council fix a joint reduction target for administrative burdens of 25%, to be achieved by 2012.
Medtem morajo države članice sprejeti podobne ukrepe na nacionalni ravni.
Member States should, in the meanwhile, take similar actions at national level.
Ključne točke osnutka poročila
Key points of the draft report
Sporočilo daje Parlamentu dobro priložnost, da poudari nekatere ključne točke v zvezi z izvajanjem boljše pravne ureditve v celoti.
The Communication gives the Parliament a good opportunity to highlight some key points concerning the whole exercise of Better Regulation.
Kot izhodišče za prihodnji osnutek poročila se lahko upošteva naslednje:
The following might be taken into consideration as a starting point for the draft report to come:
· o oceni učinka z uvedbo odbora za oceno učinka : zelo pomembno je, da ta organ, ki bo svetoval in zagotavljal podporo pri razvijanju kulture visokokakovostne ocene učinka znotraj Komisije, deluje neodvisno od služb, ki so odgovorne za oblikovanje politike.
· on impact assessment through the creation of an Impact Assessment Board : it is of the utmost importance that this body, which will offer advice and support in developing a culture of high-quality impact assessment inside the Commission, acts independently of the policy making departments.
Vendar to ne pomeni, da morajo oceno učinka obvezno opraviti zunanji strokovnjaki, ki niso zaposleni v institucijah
However, this does not necessarily mean that impact assessments must be carried out by external experts who do not belong to the Institutions
Glej zasedanje Evropskega sveta, 8. in 9. marca 2007, Sklepi predsedstva, točka 21. .
But see European Council, 8-9 March 2007, Presidency Conclusions, point 21. .
Prav tako je pomembno, da odbor za oceno učinka pomaga razviti skupno metodologijo za vse ocene učinka;
It is also necessary that the Impact Assessment Board helps develop a common methodology for all impact assessments;
· o oceni učinka v zvezi s pobudami znotraj tretjega stebra : namesto, da bi se preprosto pričakovalo od držav članic, da zagotovijo oceno učinka za svoje pobude na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah (glej člen 34(2) Pogodbe EU), je treba v ta namen jasno določiti obveznost (čeprav Komisija uradno ne more držav članic obvezati k temu);
· on impact assessment related to initiatives within the third pillar : instead of simply expecting Member States to provide an impact assessment for their initiatives in the area of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (see Article 34(2) of EU Treaty), a clear obligation should be laid down to this end (even though formally the Commission cannot oblige Member States);
· o jezikovni jasnosti : pri predstavitvi zakonodajne pobude se mora Komisija izogibati nejasnim in odvečnim izrazom ter raje uporabljati preprost in razumljiv jezik, pri čemer ohrani terminološko natančnost in pravno gotovost; predvsem se je treba izogniti zlorabi nerazumljivih kratic in opustiti preveč nepotrebnih uvodnih izjav;
· on language clarity : when presenting a legislative initiative, the Commission should avoid unclear and redundant expressions and have preferably recourse to a plain and understandable language, whilst keeping terminological precision and legal certainty; in particular, the abuse of incomprehensible acronyms and the overabundance of needless recitals must be abandoned;
· o ravni varstva : v zvezi z izvajanjem boljše pravne ureditve je treba zagotoviti ustrezno raven varstva in pravno gotovost.
· on the level of protection : in the context of the exercise of Better Regulation an appropriate level of protection and legal certainty shall be ensured.
Predvideni namen pravil in uredbe je treba upoštevati skupaj z vrednotenjem njihovih stroškov;
The intended purpose of rules and regulation has to be taken into account alongside with the evaluation of their costs;
· o vlogi Evropskega parlamenta : ponovno je treba poudariti, da mora boljša pravna ureditev vedno pomeniti polno sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta v medinstitucionalnih razpravah in, kot sozakonodajalca, pri sprejemanju zakonodaje, ki je predmet takšnega postopka; upoštevati je treba, da lahko Evropski parlament vedno obravnava primernost izbire pravnega instrumenta, ki ga je treba sprejeti (uredba, direktiva ali sklep);
· on the role of the European Parliament : it should be reaffirmed that Better Regulation must always imply the full involvement of the European Parliament both in the inter-institutional debate and, as a co-legislator, in the adoption of the legislation subject to such a process; it should also be taken into account that the European Parliament can always consider the appropriateness of the choice of the legal instrument to be adopted (regulation, directive or decision);
· o vlogi Evropske komisije: pri spremljanju uporabe zakonodaje EU s strani držav članic: Komisija mora od držav članice zahtevati (in jih ne le pozvati), da pripravijo primerjalne tabele, zlasti za preprosto preverjanje posameznega nacionalnega postopka prenosa direktiv; zato bi lahko Komisija pozvala države članice k sprejetju skupne referenčne metodologije;
· on the role of Commission: when monitoring the application of EU law by the Member States: the Commission should oblige (and not only invite) Member States to produce "correlation tables", especially with a view to easily checking each national process of transposition of directives; to this end, the Commission could call on Member States to adopt a common reference methodology;
· o razvoju komitologije : nova pravila o komitologiji
· on the developments of comitology: the new rules on comitology
Glej Sklep Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2006/512/ES z dne 17. julija 2006. , ki krepijo spremljanje izvršilnih pooblastil Komisije s strani Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, pomenijo dodaten način za poenostavitev zakonodaje Skupnosti, ker dopuščajo prenos številnih zakonodajnih pooblastil v zvezi z nepomembnimi in tehničnimi podrobnostmi na Komisijo ter tako Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu dovoljujejo, da svojo zakonodajno dejavnost osredotočita na pomembnejše določbe.
See Council decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 as amended by Council Decision 2006/512/EC of 17 July 2006. , which reinforce the scrutiny of the European Parliament and the Council on the implementing powers conferred on the Commission, constitute a further way of simplifying Community legislation in so far as it allows to transfer large regulatory powers to the Commission as for non-essential and technical details and thus permits the European Parliament and the Council to concentrate their legislative activity on more essential provisions.
14. vztraja, da mora biti Parlament redno obveščen o odločitvah, ki jih sprejme odbor za oceno učinka pod nadzorom predsednika Komisije, da se zagotovi pregleden dialog med tema dvema institucijama.
Insists that Parliament be informed periodically of the decisions adopted by the Impact Assessment Board under the supervision of the President of the Commission with a view to ensuring a transparent dialogue between the two institutions.
Boljša pravna ureditvi v Evropski uniji
Better Regulation in the European Union
o strateškem pregledu boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji
on "Better Regulation in the European Union"
iii) krepitev odgovornosti organov Skupnosti za zakonodajni proces in splošne preglednosti tega postopka zlasti z odprtjem sej Sveta za javni pregled, kadar Svet deluje v svoji zakonodajni vlogi;
(iii) strengthening of the accountability of Community bodies for the regulatory process,and of the general transparency of that process, in particular by opening Council meetings to public scrutiny when the Council is acting in its legislative capacity;
iv) vsaka ocena poenostavitve mora enakovredno upoštevati gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike ter ne sme biti omejena na kratkoročno presojo;
(iv) any assessment for simplification has to consider economic, social, environmental and health aspects on an equal footing and should not be limited to short-term considerations;
(v) postopek poenostavitve ne sme pod nobenim pogojem pomeniti zniževanje meril, ki jih vsebuje veljavna zakonodaja;
(v) the simplification process must under no circumstance entail lowering the standards contained in current legislation;
5. poziva Komisijo, da se bolj posveča izvajanju, izvrševanju in ocenjevanju zakonodaje Skupnosti kot bistvenemu delu postopka za boljšo pravno ureditev;
Urges the Commission to put more emphasis on implementation, enforcement and evaluation of Community legislation, as an essential part of the Better Regulation process;
1P/A/ENVI/ST/2006-45. , ki jo je naročil Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane Evropskega parlamenta;
1P/A/ENVI/ST/2006-45. , in its further work on better regulation;
Inštitut za evropsko okoljsko politiko (2005): V dobro ali slabo – Agenda EU o boljši pravni ureditvi in okolje.
Institute for European Environment Policy (2005): For better of for worse - The EU's 'Better Regulation' Agenda and the environment.
8. podpira zaključke študije o poenostavitvi okoljske politike EU, ki potrjuje, da so lahko presoja vpliva ključnega pomena pri zagotavljanju boljše pravne ureditve in da je treba kakovost nekaterih teh presoj izboljšati.
Supports the conclusion from the study "Simplifying EU Environmental Policy" that Impact Assessments can play an essential role in ensuring better regulation and that the quality of some of these Assessments needs to be improved.
Poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi:
Urges the Commission to ensure:
- da vsaka presoja vpliva enako upošteva gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike, tako kratkoročno kot dolgoročno;
- that impact assessments consider economic, social, environmental and health aspects on an equal footing, both in the short and the longer term;
- da presoje vpliva ne upoštevajo zgolj stroškov ukrepov, ampak tudi stroške, ki nastanejo pri neobravnavanju vprašanj v zvezi z okoljem, javnim zdravjem in hrano;
- that impact assessments consider not only the costs of measures but also the costs of not addressing the environmental, public health or food issues;
- da se presoje vpliva nanašajo na več področij in da upoštevajo različne nacionalne okoliščine v državah članicah.
- that the impact assessments are broad enough in scope and take into account the different national circumstances in the Member States.
9. poziva Komisijo, da v državah članicah še naprej spodbuja izmenjavo informacij o najboljših praksah za poenostavitev okoljske politike EU, kot so:
Calls on the Commission to further promote exchange of information on the best practices on simplification of EU environmental policy in the Member States, such as:
- poenostavitev ter povezovanje sistemov za izdajanje dovoljenj in licenc ob sočasni ohranitvi okoljskih in zdravstvenih standardov;
- the simplification and integration of permit schemes and licensing, while safeguarding the environmental and health standards;
10. se zaveda dejstva, da se lahko zakonodajno delo znotraj Unije opravlja na bolj sistematičen način; zato poziva Komisijo, da ponovno pregleda svoje delovne metode in način organizacije ter tako omogoči obravnavo različnih vprašanj na bolj horizontalen način, glavni nameni tega pa so zagotavljanje večje skladnosti, razvijanje potencialnih sinergij in preprečevanje neskladnosti.
Is conscious of the fact that the legislative work within the Union could be undertaken in a more systemic way; therefore calls on the Commission to reconsider its working methods and the way it is organised so as to be able to address various issues in a more horizontal manner, the main purpose being to ensure greater coherence, to build on possible synergies as well as to avoid inconsistencies.
Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji
Better Regulation in the European Union
Odbor za regionalni razvoj poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker boljša pravna ureditev ni izključno zmanjševanje birokracije, zmanjševanje upravnega bremena in poenostavljanje veljavne zakonodaje ali deregulacija, ampak tudi zagotavljanje, da v zakonodajnem postopku sodelujejo vsi zadevni vladni in nevladni akterji na vseh ravneh ter da se vzpostavi tesno partnerstvo med evropskimi institucijami ter nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi z namenom, da se zagotovi kakovostna pravna ureditev,
A. Whereas better regulation is not exclusively about cutting red tape, reducing administrative burden, simplifying existing legislation or de-regulation but ensuring that the legislative process is engaged with by all relevant governmental and non-governmental actors at all levels and that a close partnership is established between the European institutions and the national, regional and local authorities in order to deliver quality regulation,
B. ker mora biti vsaka raven upravljanja zavezana k boljši pravni ureditvi, da se zmanjša upravno breme,
B. Whereas every level of governance must be committed to better regulation in order to achieve any reduction in the administrative burden,
2. poziva države članice, da med zakonodajnim postopkom oblikujejo in izvajajo mehanizme posvetovanja z regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, upoštevajo njihovo zaskrbljenost med ministrskimi pogajanji ter okrepijo njihovo vlogo v postopku prenosa in izvajanja zakonodaje EU;
Calls upon the Member States to develop and to implement consultation mechanisms with the regional and local authorities during the legislative process , to take into account their concerns during ministerial negotiations and to reinforce their role during the transposition and implementation process of the EU legislation;
4. poziva Komisijo, naj si pri oblikovanju boljše pravne ureditve prizadeva, da bodo novi predpisi in njihovo izvajanje skladni, odgovorni, pregledni in razumljivi za zainteresirane strani in upravičence;
Calls upon the Commission to ensure, while developing better regulation, that new regulations and their enforcement are consistent, accountable, transparent and comprehensible for the stakeholders and the beneficiaries;
6. spodbuja organe v državah članicah, da pripravijo formalne strategije za prenos, da se jasno določijo vloge in odgovornosti regionalnih in nacionalnih vlad za boljši in hitrejši prenos;
Encourages authorities in the Member States to draw up formal transposition strategies, in order to clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the regional and national governments for a better and faster transposition;
8. poziva Komisijo, da pospeši dokončanje obsežne in prosto dostopne javne zbirke podatkov o nacionalnih izvedbenih zakonih, vključno z nacionalnimi različicami, kadar je to primerno;
Calls upon the Commission to speed up the completion of a comprehensive, freely accessible public database of national implementing laws, including regional variations where appropriate;
14. poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša zagotavljanje informacij o prenosu in postopkih za ugotavljanje kršitev, da bodo te informacije javne in lahko dostopne na spletnih straneh Komisije.
Requests the Commission to improve the provision of information about transposition and infringement proceedings, to make this information public and easily accessible on the Commission's website.
Boljša pravna ureditev v Evropski uniji
Better Regulation in the European Union
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o podpisu in začasni uporabi Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Ljudsko demokratično republiko Alžirijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Madžarske, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2006)0765 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0765 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 75, člena 83(7) in člena 43(1) Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6‑0274/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0274/2007 ),
Sklenitev Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko skupnostjo in Alžirijo zaradi upoštevanja širitve 1. maja 2004
Conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the EC and Algeria to take account of the enlargement of 1 May 2004
o zniževanju z zakonodajo predpisanih upravnih stroškov
on minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation
PE 374.082v01-00
PE 374.082v04-00
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................10
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS..............10
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................14
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS......................................................14
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o bolje oblikovanih predpisih za rast in delovna mesta v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2005)0097 ) in sporočila Komisije o skupni metodologiji EU za presojo administrativnih stroškov, ki izhajajo iz zakonodaje ( KOM(2005)0518 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union ( COM(2005)0097 ) and the communication from the Commission on an EU common methodology for assessing administrative costs imposed by legislation ( COM(2005)0518 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta osebja Komisije z naslovom Priloga k sporočilu o skupni metodologiji za presojo administrativnih stroškov, ki izhajajo iz zakonodaje: Okvir predlagane skupne metodologije EU in poročilo o pilotni fazi (april–september 2005), ( SEC(2005)1329 ),
– having regard to the Commission Staff Working Document entitled 'Annex to the communication on an EU common methodology for assessing administrative costs imposed by legislation: Outline of the proposed EU common methodology and Report on the Pilot Phase (April – September 2005)' ( SEC(2005)1329 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije spomladanskemu Evropskemu svetu "Čas za višjo prestavo – Novo partnerstvo za rast in delovna mesta" ( KOM(2006)0030 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Spring European Council-'Time to move up a gear - The new partnership for growth and jobs' ( COM(2006)0030 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o presoji vplivov zakonodaje Skupnosti in postopka posvetovanja
– having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on assessment of the impact of Community legislation and the consultation procedures
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2004 ( KOM(2005)0098 ),
– having regard to the Report from the Commission - 'Better Lawmaking 2004' ( COM(2005)0098 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za konkurenčnost z dne 13. marca 2006, na osnovi sporočila Komisije z dne 15. novembra o politiki Skupnosti za pomoč MSP,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Competitiveness Council of 13 March 2006, on the basis of the Commission’s communication of 15 November on Community policy supporting SMEs,