natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
113. poudarja, da je bila celovita metodologija EU, ki zajema ves volilni cikel ter vključuje pomoč pri volitvah in njihovo spremljanje, zelo uspešna za EU, ki je tako postala vodilna mednarodna organizacija za spremljanje volitev;
Stresses that the comprehensive EU methodology, which covers the whole electoral cycle and includes both electoral assistance and election observation, has been very successful for the EU, transforming it into a leading international election observation organisation;
115. poziva k večji pozornosti v zvezi z merili za izbor držav, v katerih se bo izvajala pomoč na volitvah/opazovanje volitev, ter v zvezi s skladnostjo z metodologijo in pravili, določenimi na mednarodni ravni, zlasti glede neodvisne narave misije;
Calls for increased vigilance with regard to the criteria for selection of the countries in which electoral assistance/election observation is to take place, and for compliance with the methodology and rules set up at international level, particularly concerning the independent nature of the mission;
Ekonomske, socialne in kulturne pravice
Economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights
125. ponovno poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj na mednarodni ravni sprožita pobude EU za boj proti preganjanju in diskriminaciji zaradi spolne usmerjenosti in spolne identitete, na primer s podporo resoluciji o teh vprašanjih na ravni Združenih narodov ter podporo nevladnim organizacijam in akterjem, ki podpirajo enakopravnost in nediskriminacijo;
Once again calls on the Council and the Commission to take EU initiatives at international level with a view to fighting persecution and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, e.g. by promoting a resolution on this issue at United Nations level and granting support to NGOs and actors who promote equality and non-discrimination;
Učinkovitost posredovanja Evropskega parlamenta v primerih, povezanih s človekovimi pravicami
Effectiveness of the European Parliament ’ s interventions in human rights cases
129. pozdravlja vzpostavitev mreže Saharova, razglašene ob praznovanju 20. obletnice nagrade Saharova; meni, da bi morala hitro odločiti o načinu svojega delovanja in zagotoviti sredstva, potrebna za doseganje svojih ciljev;
Welcomes the setting-up of the Sakharov Network, as announced on the 20th anniversary of the Sakharov Prize; believes that it should quickly decide on its operating arrangements and put in place the resources necessary to achieve its objectives;
Izhodišče tega besedila Evropskega parlamenta je letno poročilo o človekovih pravicah v svetu za leto 2008, ki ga je pripravil Svet Evropske unije
The starting-point of this EP text is the Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2008, drawn up by the Council of the European Union
Dokument Sveta št. 14146/1/08 Rev.1 .
Council document 14146/1/08 Rev.1 .
Gre za deseto letno poročilo Unije o stanju na področju človekovih pravic v svetu, ki v enem dokumentu zajema obdobje od 1. julija 2007 do 30. junija 2008, Svet pa ga je pripravil po posvetovanju z drugimi institucijami Unije.
This is the Union’s tenth annual report on the state of human rights in the world, covering the period from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 in a single text and drawn up with the Council after consultations with the other Union institutions.
Prvo takšno poročilo je bilo predstavljeno leta 2000.
The first of these reports was presented in 2000.
Od takrat so poročila postala obsežnejša, izboljšala pa se je kakovost informacij in ocen.
Since then, the reports have become bulkier and the quality of their information and evaluations has improved.
To ni le posledica zrelosti tega letnega opravila, ki je bila s stalnimi popravki, širjenjem ter izboljšavo strukture in vsebine naravno dosežena v teh letih, vendar tudi in predvsem zato, ker odraža razvoj ukrepov EU na področju človekovih pravic v tem obdobju.
This is not only because, as is natural, this annual exercise has matured over the years, with progressive corrections, extensions and improvements to its structure and content, but also and above all because this annual report reflects the development over time of the EU’s actions in the field of human rights.
Širitev ukrepov EU, v količinskem in kakovostnem smislu, za zagotavljanje, zaščito in spodbujanje človekovih pravic v svetu se je odrazila v letnem poročilu, ki ocenjuje ta neizogibno zapleten proces, v katerem ne manjka protislovij.
The EU’s action in affirming, defending and promoting human rights in the world has expanded both quantitatively and qualitatively, and the Annual Report has reflected and evaluated that process, which is inevitably complex and cannot be totally free of contradictions.
Cilji in posledice poročila
Objectives and repercussions of the report
Cilja tega poročila sta v osnovi dva.
The objectives of the report are essentially twofold.
Prvi namen poročila je zagotoviti referenčni dokument, ki bo omogočil zavedanje in razpravo o letnih ukrepih ter njihovo oceno, ter po potrebi njihovo izboljšanje, popravek in razširitev glede na prihodnje operacije.
Firstly, it is intended to supply a documentary reference basis making possible awareness, discussion and evaluation of the year’s actions, with the aim where relevant of improvement, correction and expansion in respect of future operations.
V zvezi s tem natančen pregled poročila v Parlamentu predstavlja ključen trenutek sedanje razprave za določanje prednostnih nalog, opredelitev vprašanj, ki zahtevajo ukrepe na ravni EU, ter ohranjanje seznama stanj, ki zahtevajo posebno pozornost, in sicer z rednimi ocenami.
In this connection, the detailed examination of the report in Parliament represents a key moment, in the context of the ongoing debate aimed at setting priorities, identifying issues which require action at EU level, and maintaining, with periodic evaluation, a list of situations calling for especial vigilance.
Kot je poudarjeno v samem poročilu, je njegov drugi namen „obveščanje najširše javnosti v Evropi in zunaj meja Unije o ukrepih EU za uveljavljanje človekovih pravic po vsem svetu“.
Secondly, it is intended, as the report itself stresses, to ‘inform the widest possible audience, both in Europe and beyond the frontiers of the Union, of the EU’s actions to promote human rights worldwide’;
Poročilo je torej letni referenčni dokument, ki je namenjen vsem tistim, katerih delovanje neposredno ali posredno vpliva na sedanje dejansko stanje na področju človekovih pravic v svetu, ter tistim, ki so žrtve posledic slabih razmer: javno mnenje, vlade, parlamenti in uprave ter nacionalne in multilateralne institucije, nevladni in nedržavni akterji na splošno v vlogi elementov v razvijajoči se svetovni civilni družbi.
It is thus an annual reference document, addressed to all those whose actions in one way or another, directly or indirectly, influence the configuration of the existing concrete situation concerning human rights in the world, as also to those who suffer from a hostile situation: public opinion; governments, parliaments and administrations, and national and multilateral institutions; and NGOs and non-state actors in general, in their capacity as elements of an embryonic global civil society;
Letna objava tega poročila bi morala biti pomemben dogodek.
The yearly publication of this report should be considered an important event.
Leta 2008 beležimo 60. obletnico splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah in v tem letu ima EU ključno vlogo, prav tako pa mora opraviti bilanco napredka in nazadovanja na področju človekovih pravic v svetu.
2008 marks the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in such a year, including as it does a balance-sheet on the state of advances and setbacks for human rights in the world, the EU has a crucial role to play.
Kot je zapisano v uvodu poročila, je uveljavljanje človekovih pravic postalo eden najbolj razvitih vidikov zunanjih odnosov Evropske unije.
In the words of the preface to the report, ‘promotion of human rights is now one of the most highly-developed facets of the European Union’s external relations’.
Letno poročilo opisuje in analizira celotno delovanje Unije na področju spodbujanja človekovih pravic po vsem svetu, poleg tega pa ponuja povzetek stanja na tem področju v različnih državah in regijah.
The Annual Report does not only describe and analyse the entirety of the Union’s action to promote human rights worldwide: it also offers a summing-up of the concrete state of human rights in different countries and regions.
Njegov učinek bi zato moral biti velik, njegova objava pa bi morala biti pozdravljena kot dogodek, ki zasluži posebno oglaševanje in zanimanje.
Its impact should therefore be substantial, and its publication should be greeted as an event meriting particular publicity and interest.
Po objektivnih in racionalnih ocenah, ki ne odražajo le želja, to zaenkrat še ni uresničeno ali vsaj ne v potrebni meri.
However, that is still not the case, or at least not to the extent that it should be - and that on purely objective and rational grounds that have nothing to do with wishful thinking.
Prepoznavnost letnega poročila je treba znatno izboljšati.
The visibility of the Annual Report is in need of considerable improvement.
Parlament je to v zadnjih letih večkrat ponovil, zdaj pa je čas za pobudo za dvig prepoznavnosti letnih poročil EU o človekovih pravicah v svetu.
Parliament has made this point repeatedly over the past few years, and it is now high time for an initiative for raising the profile of the EU’s Annual Reports on human rights in the world.
Med neštetimi dejavnostmi, pobudami, smernicami, poročili in dokumenti zelo raznolike narave, ki prihajajo iz institucij Unije, mora letno poročilo še doseči prepoznavnost in odmevnost, ki ju zasluži.
Among the seemingly endless activities, initiatives, declarations, guidelines, reports and documents of the most varied nature that emanate from the Union institutions, the Annual Report has yet to achieve the profile and resonance due to it.
To je še posebej obžalovanja vredno, če upoštevamo ključno vlogo komunikacije z aktivnimi in pasivnimi subjekti problematike človekovih pravic v boju za spodbujanje in zaščito človekovih pravic.
This is particularly unfortunate if we consider the absolutely crucial role played in the fight to promote and defend human rights by communication with the people who affect or are affected by human rights issues.
To je še bolj očitno v svetu, kjer javno mnenje vedno bolj opredeljuje medsebojna komunikacija in vpliv sredstev komuniciranja.
This should be ever more obvious in a world where public opinion is increasingly characterised by intercommunication and influenced by the communications media.
Učinek letnega poročila je odvisen predvsem od dejavnika, ki ni povezan s pripravo poročila ali s samim razvojem posegov EU na področju človekovih pravic v svetu.
In the first place, the impact of the Annual Report depends on a factor which has nothing to do with its preparation, or, indeed, with the state of the EU’s human rights interventions in the world.
Ta razvoj, posledično pa vsebina in vpliv tega poročila, ki opisuje in ocenjuje, je odvisen predvsem od notranjih politik Unije na področju človekovih pravic.
What happens over human rights, and, consequently, the content and authority of the report describing and evaluating what happens, is essentially dependent on the Union’s own internal human rights policies.
Uspeh EU pri spodbujanju človekovih pravic zunaj svojih meja bo vedno odvisen od zgleda, ki ga daje znotraj Unije.
The EU’s success in promoting human rights outside its borders will at all moments be conditional on how far it sets an example by doing the same at home.
Vpliv Unije pri obrambi, zaščiti in širjenju človekovih pravic po svetu bo imel vrednost le, če bo postavila zgled s svojimi notranjimi politikami.
The Union will only be able to wield influence regarding the defence, protection and expansion of human rights worldwide if it sets an example in its own internal policies.
Po besedah poročila gre za vprašanje verodostojnosti delovanja Unije na mednarodnem prizorišču.
In the words of the report, this is a basic matter of ‘credibility on the international stage’.
V tem smislu je treba posebno pozornost posvetiti dvema ključnima področjema, saj sta za obsežne sektorje javnega mnenja merilo evropske verodostojnosti na področju človekovih pravic.
Here, two key aspects require priority attention, given their touchstone status for large sectors of public opinion worldwide as regards Europe’s credibility on human rights issues.
To sta politika priseljevanja in protiteroristična politika, ki se morata ves čas izvajati ob strogem spoštovanju posameznika in zakonodaje.
These are immigration policy and anti-terrorist policy, both of which must at all moments be conducted on a basis of rigorous respect for human beings and for the law.
Kar zadeva njegovo vsebino bi moralo letno poročilo biti čimbolj jasno in po potrebi vsebovati samokritiko in kritiko.
The Annual Report should, as far as its content is concerned, be as clear as possible and should include self-criticism and criticism where necessary.
Njegov vpliv, sloves in sposobnost vplivanja bodo odvisni predvsem od natančnosti in odkritosti pri pripravi.
Its authority, prestige and capacity to influence will depend essentially on the rigour and honesty with which it is drawn up.
Obliko poročila je treba poenostaviti, da se omogoči lažje komuniciranje, ravnanje z njim in branje: uvod in sklepi bi morali biti daljši, da bi dosegli ravnovesje z dolgoveznimi analitičnimi deli.
The report’s form needs to be simplified for maximum ease of communication, handling and reading: the introduction and conclusions should be longer, so as to strike a better balance with the more long-winded analytic parts.
Potrebni so izvlečki ali povzetki, ki bi bili za medije in javnost sprejemljivejši.
There should be abstracts or executive summaries, which would be more digestible for the media and the public.
Javno predstavitev letnega poročila je treba obravnavati kot slovesno priložnost.
The public presentation of the Annual Report should be treated as a solemn occasion.
Objavo je treba organizirati na podlagi tiskovnih in komunikacijskih načrtov, s posebnimi programi, ki bi jih usklajevale različne institucije EU.
Its publicisation should be organised on a basis of press and communication plans, with specific programmes coordinated by the various EU institutions.
Pri teh programih je treba posebej poudariti močno in interaktivno prisotnost na internetu.
These programmes should particularly stress a powerful and interactive Internet presence.
Redno je treba izvajati tudi empirične študije o naravi učinka in sprejemu letnih poročil EU o človekovih pravicah v svetu, v medijih, na mednarodni politični sceni, pri nacionalnih in mednarodnih organih ter organizacijah v za človekove pravice in v javnosti.
There should also be regular empirical studies of the nature of the impact and reception of the EU’s annual reports on human rights in the world, covering the media, the international political scene, national and international human rights bodies and organisations, and public opinion.
Položaj žensk, stanje na področju nasilja nad ženskami in umori žensk
Situation of women, violence against women and feminicides
Kar zadeva vprašanja pravic žensk, je poročilo lahko le odraz stanja, ki je še vedno zelo različno in nezadovoljivo.
Concerning women’s rights issues, the report can only be the reflection of a situation which is still fragmentary and unsatisfactory.
Prednostna področja, ki jih je določila EU, skupaj z ustreznimi smernicami (smrtna kazen, mučenje, zagovorniki človekovih pravic, otroci vojaki, pravice otrok, spodbujanje mednarodnega humanitarnega prava itd.), ne odražajo podrejenega položaja žensk v številnih delih sveta (kar močno vpliva na človekove pravice) in krutega ter zelo razširjenega pojava nasilja nad ženskami ali grozljivih primerov umorov žensk v nekaterih državah, prav tako pa ta vprašanja niso ustrezno izpostavljena in določena kot prednostna.
The priority areas defined by the EU, with their corresponding guidelines (the death penalty, torture, human rights activists, child soldiers, rights of the child, promotion of international humanitarian law, etc) highlight neither the subaltern condition of women in many parts of the world (which impacts severely on their human rights), nor the grave and widespread phenomenon of violence against women or the appalling cases of feminicide in certain countries - or, at least, these issues are not stressed or prioritised as they should be.
To je v nasprotju z obstoječim splošnim soglasjem, da so skoraj povsod po svetu ženske prve žrtve diskriminacije, neenakosti, nadlegovanja in nasilja.
This is in contradiction to the general consensus to the effect that, almost everywhere in the world, the first victims of discrimination, inequality, harassment and violence are women.
To ne zadostuje za promocijo pristopov integracije načela enakosti in kampanj na področju človekovih pravic : potrebno je oblikovanje prodorno zasnovanih, specifičnih pristopov in usmerjenih ukrepov.
Here, it is not enough to promote mainstreaming approaches and campaigns in the human rights field: what is needed is a matter of firmly conceived specific approaches and targeted actions.
Na področju oblikovanja posebnih politik in ukrepov EU za človekove pravice žensk smo priča vrzeli, ki jo je treba zapolniti.
There is a gap which has to be filled in terms of the development of specific EU policies and actions for the human rights of women.
Ta vrzel se odraža v poročilu, katerega tematske analize ne vsebujejo veliko konkretnih informacij ali analiz na tem področju.
This gap is reflected in the report, whose thematic analyses do not contain much concrete information or analysis in that area.
V zvezi s tem je treba pozdraviti nov prednostni status, ki ga je v drugi polovici leta 2008 francosko predsedstvo dodelilo vprašanjem žensk v okviru ukrepov EU na področju človekovih pravic, pri tem pa je treba poudariti potrebo po obravnavanju tragičnega pojava nasilja nad ženskami in umorov žensk.
In this context, it is important to welcome the new priority status given by the French presidency in the second half of 2008 to women’s issues in the context of the EU’s action in the field of human rights, stressing, in particular, the need to tackle the tragic phenomena of violence against women and feminicide;
Evropski parlament mora biti posebej pozoren in pazljiv pri zagotavljanju prenosa teh dobrih namenov v resnična dejanja, saj bo s tem omogočil, da bo v prihodnjih poročilih o človekovih pravicah zaznan znaten napredek EU na področju človekovih pravic žensk.
The EP must be particularly attentive and alert with a view to ensuring that these good intentions are translated into real actions, thus enabling future annual human rights reports to register significant progress by the EU on the human rights of women.
Takšen pristop mora vsebovati reformo jezika, katere pomena ne smemo podcenjevati, da bi odstranili vse seksistične konotacije; v jezikih, kjer je zaradi zgodovinskih razlogov to razločevanje še prisotno, bi bilo treba izraze, kot je na primer angleški „rights of man“, nadomestiti z izrazi, kot je „human rights“.
One component - not to be undervalued - of such an approach should be a reform of language so as to remove all sexist connotations; for example, wherever possible expressions of the type ‘rights of man’ should be replaced by ‘human rights’ in those Union languages where, for historical reasons, such a distinction persists.
Ukinitvi smrtne kazni po vsem svetu naproti
Towards abolition of the death penalty worldwide
Današnja generacija mora doseči dokončno odpravo barbarskega, nevzdržnega in zastarelega pojava, kot je smrtna kazen, po vsem svetu.
Those alive today need to seek the final abolition everywhere in the world of the barbarous, intolerable and archaic phenomenon that is the death penalty.
Kot so bili naši predniki uspešni pri odpravi suženjstva skoraj povsod, se moramo danes boriti za odpravo smrtne kazni v svetu, saj je to cilj, ki je zdaj zgodovinsko mogoč in dosegljiv.
Just as our forbears succeeded in eradicating slavery almost everywhere, today we must fight to put an end to capital punishment worldwide, as a goal that is historically possible and achievable in our time.
V tej sodobni bitki mora EU še naprej delovati v ospredju z vso obstoječo politično voljo in svežim zagonom na podlagi smernic za politiko EU v zvezi s tretjimi državami in smrtno kaznijo, ki so bile sprejete leta 1998 in spremenjene leta 2008
In this latter-day struggle, it is for the EU to keep up its vanguard action, with all possible political will and fresh impetus, on the basis of the EU policy guidelines concerning third countries and the death penalty, adopted in 1998 and revised in 2008
V letu, obravnavanem v poročilu, so bili narejeni pomembni koraki na poti k uresničitvi svetovnega cilja dokončne odprave smrtne kazni.
Over the year covered by the report, significant steps were taken as regards the global objective of ending the death penalty forever.
Kljub spreminjajočim se rezultatom je EU vztrajno nadaljevala s predstavitvami na to temo v 47 državah, kjer žal še obstaja smrtna kazen
Persistently albeit with varying results, the EU has continued to make representations on the subject, with the 47 countries that unfortunately still have capital punishment
Afganistan, Belorusija, Brunej, Burundi, Čad, Egipt, Ekvatorialna Gvineja, Etiopija, Fidži, Gana, Grenada, Gvatemala, Gvineja Bissau, Indija, Irak, Iran, Japonska, Jemen, Južna Koreja, Kanada, Kazahstan, Kenija, Kirgizistan, Kongo (Brazzaville), Kuvajt, Liberija, Libija, Madagaskar, Malavi, Maroko, Namibija, Niger, Papua Nova Gvineja, Palau, Rusija, Saudova Arabija, Sirija, Sudan, Tajvan, Tanzanija, Togo, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Zambija, ZDA in Združeni arabski emirati. .
Afghanistan, Belarus, Brunei, Burundi, Canada, Chad, Congo (DRC), Congo (Brazzaville), Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, India, Iran, Iraq, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Morocco, Namibia, Niger, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Sudan, Syria, Taiwan, Tanzania, Togo, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, the US, Uzbekistan, Yemen, and Zambia. .
Prav tako je na to temo podala številne uradne izjave, predvsem po objavi usmrtitve mladoletnikov v Iranu.
A number of public statements were also made on the issue, notably following the announcement of executions of minors in Iran.
Maja 2008 je EU izrazila zaskrbljenost zaradi novega vala usmrtitev v ZDA in pozvala k takojšnji obnovitvi dejanskega moratorija.
In May 2008 the EU expressed its consternation at the renewed wave of executions in the US and called for the immediate restoration of a de facto moratorium there.
Pozdravila je objavo odprave smrtne kazni v Ruandi in Uzbekistanu (2008) ter v ameriški zvezni državi New Jersey (2007).
It welcomed the announced abolition of the death penalty in Rwanda and Uzbekistan (2008), and in the American state of New Jersey (2007).
Na plenarnem zasedanju generalne skupščine Združenih narodov 18. decembra 2007 je bila sprejeta resolucija, ki poziva k moratoriju na smrtno kazen in je rezultat dela medregijske koalicije držav članic Združenih narodov, kjer je EU predstavljala Portugalska.
The plenary of the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution calling for a moratorium on the death penalty at its session of 18 December 2007, following the work of an interregional coalition of UN member states, within which the EU was represented by Portugal.
To je zelo pomemben napredek; kot je poudarjeno v letnem poročilu, predstavlja vrhunec dolgotrajnih prizadevanj EU in pomeni preobrat v svetovni kampanji Združenih narodov proti smrtni kazni.
This is a development of major importance; as the Annual Report stresses, it represents the culmination of prolonged efforts by the EU and is also a turning-point in the worldwide campaign against capital punishment at the UN.
Doseženi napredek na poti k odpravi smrtne kazni sicer še ni zadovoljiv
The progress achieved towards abolition of the death penalty, though not sufficient to satisfy us