natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
D. ker mora Parlament še naprej sodelovati s Svetom Evrope v zvezi z varstvom človekovih pravic,
D. whereas Parliament should continue to cooperate with the Council of Europe on the protection of human rights,
2. poziva Svet, naj svojo ad hoc delovno skupino za temeljne pravice in državljanstvo preoblikuje v stalno delovno skupino, ki bi lahko delovala vzporedno z delovno skupino za človekove pravice (COHOM), ter poziva Komisijo, da dodeli resor človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin enemu komisarju;
Urges the Council to transform its ad hoc working group on fundamental rights and citizenship into a standing Working Party, which could work in parallel with the Working Party on Human Rights (COHOM), and urges the Commission to assign a portfolio on human rights and fundamental freedoms to a single Commissioner;
4. poziva institucije EU in države članice, naj začnejo izvajati priporočila iz resolucije z dne 14. februarja 2007 o domnevi, da je Cia uporabljala evropske države za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje zapornikov
Urges the EU institutions and the Member States to implement the recommendations contained in its resolution of 14 February 2007 on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners
309. , katerih namen je pojasniti vlogo držav članic pri nezakonitem ravnanju izredne izročitve in zagotoviti, da Unija in države članice v prihodnje ne bodo več vpletene v podobne kršitve človekovih pravic;
309. , which are aimed at unravelling the role of the Member States in the illegal practice of extraordinary rendition and ensuring that the Union and the Member States will no longer be involved in similar breaches of human rights in future;
7. spodbuja EU, da še naprej krepi skupno področje varnosti, svobode in pravice, s čimer bo mogoče, prek skupne politike priseljevanja, doseči optimalno varstvo pravic državljanov iz tretjih držav, ki prihajajo na ozemlje EU, ter ugotavlja, da v nekaterih državah članicah določbe o območju varnosti, svobode in pravice niso obvezujoče;
Encourages the EU to continue strengthening the single area of security, freedom and justice, through which it will be possible, with a single immigration policy, to achieve the optimum protection of the rights of third country nationals arriving on EU territory, and notes that, in some Member States, the provisions concerning the area of security, freedom and justice are not binding;
10. poziva države članice, da v celoti zagotovijo spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin prosilcev za azil in priseljencev, ne glede na njihov pravni status na območju EU, kar je pogoj za zagotavljanje verodostojnega obravnavanja človekovih pravic v EU in zunaj nje;
Asks the M ember States to ensure full respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of asylum-seekers and immigrants, regardless of their legal or illegal status on EU soil, which is a precondition for ensuring a credible EU human rights policy both inside a nd outside the EU;
1. in Direktivi Sveta št. 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali apatridi, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite
1. and Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted
Alexander Alvaro, Philip Bradbourn, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Armando França, Urszula Gacek, Patrick Gaubert, Lilli Gruber, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Ewa Klamt, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Sarah Ludford, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu, Inger Segelström, Vladimir Uručev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber
Alexander Alvaro, Philip Bradbourn, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Armando França, Urszula Gacek, Patrick Gaubert, Lilli Gruber, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Ewa Klamt, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Sarah Ludford, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu, Inger Segelström, Vladimir Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law
Dan Jørgensen , Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
Dan Jørgensen , Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
(*) Pridruženi odbor – Člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Procedure with associated committees – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane (*) ..............31
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (*) 33
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on protection of the environment through criminal law
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0051 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0051 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 175(1) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C6‑0063/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0063/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0154/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0154/2008 ),
(4a) Jasno je,da bo uspeh prizadevanj za reševanje okoljskega kriminala v čezmejnem okviru odvisen od ustrezne vloge organov, ki usklajujejo mednarodne predhodne postopke (Europol, Eurojust, skupne preiskovalne enote), in večje učinkovitosti teh organov v zvezi s pristojnostmi in organizacijo.
(4a) It is clear that the success of efforts to tackle environmental crime in a cross-border context will depend on an appropriate role for bodies coordinating international pre-trial proceedings (Europol, Eurojust, joint investigation teams) and greater effectiveness of those bodies in terms of competences and organisation.
(5) Ker je bila naloga nalaganja sankcij namesto upravnim organom zaupana sodnim organom, so za preiskave in izvajanje okoljskih predpisov odgovorni organi, neodvisni od organov, ki izdajajo dovoljenja in pooblastila.
(5) By entrusting judicial authorities, rather than administrative authorities, with the task of imposing sanctions, responsibility for investigating and enforcing the respect of environmental regulations falls to authorities which are independent of those which grant exploitation licences and discharge authorisations.
Namesto načela „lojalnega sodelovanja“ in ustaljenega načela „effet utile“ (načela učinkovitosti).
Superseding the principle of ‘loyal cooperation’ and the established legal principle of ‘effet utile’.
Poleg tega člen 10 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti določa, da države članice sprejemajo vse ustrezne ukrepe, splošne ali posebne, da bi zagotovile izpolnjevanje obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz te pogodbe ali so posledica ukrepov institucij Skupnosti.
Moreover, Article 10 of the Treaty establishing the European Community provides that ‘Member States shall take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of this Treaty or resulting from action taken by the institutions of the Community.
Tako olajšujejo izpolnjevanje nalog Skupnosti.
They shall facilitate the achievement of the Community's tasks’.
(6) Za učinkovito varstvo okolja so zlasti potrebne bolj odvračilne sankcije za dejavnosti, ki obremenjujejo okolje in ponavadi povzročajo ali je verjetno, da bodo povzročile dejansko škodo ozračju, stratosferi, zemlji, vodi, živalim ali rastlinam, vključno z ohranjanjem vrst.
(6) In order to achieve effective protection of the environment, there is a particular need for more dissuasive sanctions for environmentally harmful activities, which typically cause or are likely to cause substantial damage to the air, including the stratosphere, soil, water, animals or plants, including to the conservation of species.
(6) Za učinkovito varstvo okolja so zlasti potrebne bolj odvračilne sankcije za dejavnosti, ki obremenjujejo okolje in ponavadi povzročajo ali je verjetno, da bodo povzročile dejansko škodo krajini, ozračju, stratosferi, živi skali, zemlji, vodi, živalim ali rastlinam, vključno z ohranjanjem vrst.
(6) In order to achieve effective protection of the environment, there is a particular need for more dissuasive sanctions for environmentally harmful activities, which typically cause or are likely to cause substantial damage to the landscape, the air, including the stratosphere , bedrock , soil, water, animals or plants, including to the conservation of species.
V zvezi z dejavnostmi, ki škodujejo okolju, ni bila omenjena živa skala (litosfera).
In connection with environmentally harmful activities, no mention is made of bedrock (the lithosphere).
Prst, tam kjer je, predstavlja le zunanjo plast, ki je globoka do 1,5 metra in se tvori na matični kamnini.
Soil (where it exists) is merely an outer layer – up to 1.5 metres deep – which forms on the parent rock.
Odlagališča smeti in skladišča odpadkov, ki morda vsebujejo nevarne ali radioaktivne snovi, je mogoče najti v starih rudnikih ali kamnolomih, torej v živi skali.
Rubbish dumps and waste stockpiles (which may contain hazardous or radioactive waste) can be found in old mines or quarries (and therefore in the bedrock itself).
Kopenske ekosisteme lahko ogrožajo še zlasti dnevni kopi, ki lahko povzročijo veliko škode.
Open-cast mining in particular can disrupt land ecosystems, causing major damage.
(6a) Zakonodaja iz prilog k tej direktivi obsega določbe, za katere naj bi veljali kazenskopravni ukrepi, da bi tako zagotovili popolno učinkovitost pravil, določenih za varstvo okolja.
(6a) The legislation listed in the Annex to this Directive contains provisions which should be subject to measures which relate to criminal law, in order to ensure that the rules on environmental protection are fully effective.
(6b) Obveznosti, ki so določene po tej direktivi, se nanašajo le na določbe zakonodaje iz prilog k tej direktivi, ki za države članice pomenijo, da morajo pri izvajanju te zakonodaje določiti ukrepe prepovedi.
(6b) The obligations imposed by this Directive relate only to the provisions of the legislation listed in the Annex hereto which entail an obligation for Member States, when implementing that legislation, to provide for prohibitive measures.
(9a) Ta direktiva zavezuje države članice, da v svojo nacionalno zakonodajo vključijo kazenske sankcije za hude kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti o varstvu okolja.
(9a) This Directive obliges the Member States to include in their national legislation criminal sanctions for serious violations of Community environmental protection law.
Ne ustvarja obveznosti v zvezi z izvajanjem teh sankcij ali drugih pravnih instrumentov, ki so na voljo, v posameznih primerih.
It does not create obligations with regard to the implementation of such sanctions or of other available legal instruments in individual cases.
V skladu s sodbo Sodišča z dne 23. oktobra 2007 (C-440/05) zakonodajalec Skupnosti lahko od držav članic zahteva, da predvidijo sankcije takšne vrste, da se zagotovi, da so zakoni, ki jih sprejema v specifičnem sektorju, popolnoma učinkoviti, čeprav načeloma kazensko pravo in pravila kazenskega postopka ne spadajo v pristojnost Skupnosti.
Pursuant to the Court of Justice judgment of 23 October 2007 (C-440/05), although in principle criminal law and the rules of criminal procedure do not fall within Community competence, the Community legislator can require the Member States to make provision for sanctions of this kind to ensure that the laws that it enacts in a specific sector are fully effective.
(11) Prav tako je treba zaradi bistvenih razlik v ravni sankcij v državah članicah v določenih okoliščinah predvideti približevanje teh ravni v sladu z resnostjo kaznivega dejanja.
(11) Furthermore, the significant differences in the level of sanctions in the Member States make it necessary to foresee, under certain circumstances, an approximation of those levels corresponding to the seriousness of the offence.
Posledica Sodbe Sodišča z dne 23. oktobra 2007 (C-440/05), po kateri določevanje načina in obsega uporabljenih kazenskih sankcij ni v pristojnosti Skupnosti (glej odstavek 70).
Consequence of the ruling handed down by the Court of Justice on 23 October 2007 (C‑440/05) to the effect that determination of the type and level of the criminal penalties to be applied does not fall within the Community’s sphere of competence (see paragraph 70).
(12) Tako približevanje je posebej pomembno, če imajo kazniva dejanja hude posledice ali je kaznivo dejanje strojeno v okviru kriminalnih združb, ki v okoljskem kriminalu igrajo pomembno vlogo.
(12) Such an approximation is particularly important where the offences have serious results or the offences are committed in the framework of criminal organisations which play a significant role in environmental crime.
(12a) Kjer se po določenem času izkaže, da stalna dejavnost povzroča okoljsko škodo, kar potem lahko vodi do kazenske odgovornosti po tej direktivi, bi se moralo na vprašanje, ali je povzročitelj škode deloval namerno ali iz malomarnosti, odgovoriti glede na čas, ko je storilec izvedel ali bi moral izvedeti za dejstva, ki predstavljajo kaznivo dejanje, in ne na čas, ko je storilec začel z dejavnostjo.
(12a) Where a continuing activity proves after a lapse of time to give rise to environmental damage which may in turn give rise to criminal liability under this Directive, the question whether or not the perpetrator of the damage acted intentionally or negligently should be determined by reference to the time when the perpetrator became aware, or should have been aware, of the facts constituting the offence and not to the time when the perpetrator commenced its activity.
V zvezi s tem je treba upoštevati, da predhodna izdaja pooblastila, dovoljenja ali koncesije v takšnih okoliščinah ne bi smela pomeniti zaščite.
It should be borne in mind in this connection that the prior grant of an authorisation, licence or concession should not constitute a defence in such circumstances.
(12b) Subjektivni element za kazniva dejanja, ki jih določijo države članice po tej direktivi, bi moral biti naklep ali vsaj huda malomarnost.
(12b) The mental element for the criminal offences to be created by the Member States pursuant to this Directive should be intention or at least serious negligence.
V skladu s tem bi morali organi kazenskega pregona in sodišča v državah članicah imeti prosto presojo, da ne preganjajo kaznivih dejanj v zvezi z zaščitenimi prosto živečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami ali njihovimi deli ali iz njih izdelanimi izdelki, če sporno ravnanje zadeva zanemarljivo količino primerkov in ima zanemarljiv učinek na stanje ohranjenosti vrste ter ta oseba ali te osebe niso vedele, da so te prosto živeče živali in rastline zaščitene.
Accordingly, the prosecuting authorities and the courts in the Member States should have a discretion not to prosecute for offences concerning protected wild fauna and flora species, or parts or derivatives thereof, where the conduct complained of concerns a negligible quantity of specimens and has a negligible impact on the conservation status of the species concerned and where the person or persons concerned were unaware of the protected status of the wild fauna or flora concerned.
(13) Ker ta direktiva predvideva minimalne predpise, lahko države članice sprejmejo ali ohranijo strožje predpise glede učinkovitega kazenskopravnega varstva okolja.
(13) As this Directive provides for minimum rules, Member States are free to adopt or maintain more stringent provisions regarding the effective criminal law protection of the environment.
(13a) Pogodba Euratom in sekundarna zakonodaja, sprejeta na podlagi le-te, urejata varstvo okolja v zvezi z jedrsko dejavnostjo.
(13a) The Euratom Treaty and the secondary legislation enacted pursuant thereto regulate environmental protection with regard to nuclear activity.
Zatorej se nezakonitost dejanj, ki vplivajo na okolje kot posledica jedrskih dejavnosti, lahko določi le v skladu s Pogodbo Euratom in sekundarno zakonodajo, sprejeto na njeni podlagi.
As a result, the unlawfulness of actions which affect the environment as a result of nuclear activities can be defined only by reference to the Euratom Treaty and the secondary legislation enacted pursuant thereto.
Poglavje III Pogodbe Euratom je pravna osnova za dejavnosti Skupnosti na področju varstva okolja, kadar gre za jedrsko dejavnost.
Chapter III of the Euratom Treaty is the legal basis for Community action in the area of environmental protection where nuclear activity is involved.
Izredno pomembno, da se besedilo uskladi, tako da se posebno poudari, da Pogodba Euratom ostaja osnova za vprašanja, povezana z jedrsko energijo.
It is most important that the text be brought into line by specifying that the Euratom Treaty remains the basis for nuclear-related issues.
Posledično se vsaka kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti na podlagi pogodbe, če izvira iz jedrske dejavnosti, šteje za nezakonito.
Consequently, any infringement of Community legislation passed on the basis of the Treaty must, if it stems from nuclear activity, be considered unlawful.
(15) Ker države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči ciljev predlaganih ukrepov, namreč zagotoviti učinkovitejše varstvo okolja in jih je zato laže doseči na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, kot je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe.
(15) Since the objectives of the action to be taken, namely to ensure a more effective protection of the environment, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega okvira, ki je potreben za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
(15) Ker države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči ciljev predlaganih ukrepov, namreč zagotoviti učinkovitejše varstvo okolja , na primer z bojem proti obsežnemu organiziranemu kriminalu, ki povzroča veliko okoljsko škodo, in jih je zato laže doseči na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, kot je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe.
(15) Since the objectives of the action to be taken, namely to ensure a more effective protection of the environment, for example by combating large-scale organised crime which causes serious environmental damage, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ta direktiva določa ukrepe na področju kazenskega prava za bolj učinkovito varstvo okolja.
This Directive establishes measures relating to criminal law in order to protect the environment more effectively.
Direktiva zadeva le kazensko odgovornost in ne posega v pravo Skupnosti ali nacionalno pravo ter predpise, ki izhajajo iz njiju, v zvezi s civilno odgovornostjo za okoljsko škodo.
It concerns criminal liability only and is without prejudice to Community or national law, and to any rules derived therefrom, with respect to civil liability for environmental harm.
Treba je zagotoviti, da kazenski pregon hkrati ne preprečuje izvajanja zakonodaje o okoljski odgovornosti, ki je osredotočena na odpravo škode.
It is important to ensure that a criminal prosecution does not preclude at the same time the application of environmental liability legislation, which is focused on damage repair.
Člen 2, točka (a)
Article 2, point a
(a) „nezakonit“ pomeni kršenje zakonodaje Skupnosti ali zakona, upravnega predpisa ali odločitve pristojnega organa v državi članici, ki so namenjeni varstvu okolja ;
(a) “unlawful” means infringing Community legislation or a law, an administrative regulation or a decision taken by a competent authority in a Member State aiming at the protection of the environment .
a) „nezakonit“ pomeni kršenje v prilogi A navedene zakonodaje Skupnosti ali zakona, upravnega predpisa ali odločitve pristojnega organa v državi članici, ki so namenjeni izvajanju te zakonodaje Skupnosti ;
(a) “unlawful” means infringing a Community act listed in Annex A hereto or a law, an administrative regulation or a decision taken by a competent authority in a Member State intended to transpose Community legislation .
V zvezi z dejavnostmi iz pogodbe Euratom pomeni kršitev katere koli zakonodaje Skupnosti, navedene v prilogi B;
As regards activities covered by the Euratom Treaty, it means infringing any Community act listed in Annex B hereto;
Člen 2, točka a a (novo)
Article 2, point a a (new)
(aa) „zaščitene divje živalske in rastlinske vrste“:
(aa) "protected wild fauna and flora species" means:
(i) za kazniva dejanja iz člena 3(g) tiste, ki so navedene v:
(i) for the offence referred to in Article 3(g), those listed in:
– prilogi IV Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst;
– Annex IV to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora 1 ;
– prilogi I in členu 4(2) Direktive Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic 2 ; in
– Annex 1 to, and referred to in Article 4(2) of, Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds 2 ; and
(ii) za kaznivo dejanje v zvezi s trgovino iz člena 3(ga) tiste, ki so navedene v:
(ii) for the trade-related offence referred to in Article 3(ga), those listed in:
– prilogah A ali B k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 338/97 z dne 9. decembra 1996 o varstvu prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst z zakonsko ureditvijo trgovine z njimi 3 ;
– Annexes A or B to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein 3 ;
1 UL L 206, 22.07.1992, str.
1 OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
2 UL L 103, 25.04.1979, str.
2 OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2006/105/ES (UL L 363, 20.12.2006, str.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/105/EC (JO L 363, 20.12.2006, p.
3 UL L 61, 03.03.1997, str.
3 OJ L 61, 3.3.1997, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1332/2005 (UL L 215, 19.8.2005, str.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1332/2005 (OJ L 215, 19.8.2005, p.
Člen 2, točka a b (novo)
Article 2, point a b (new)