natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisijo poziva, naj prispeva k sedanji reformi finančne uredbe, ki ima naslednje cilje: povečanje skladnosti v sedanjem pravnem okviru, zmanjšanje določb; jasnost, nedvoumnost in izvedljivost; v ta namen poziva k vključitvi pravil o sodelovanju v glavni del finančne uredbe;
Calls on the Commission to contribute to the present reform of the Financial Regulation, which pursues the following aims: increase of coherence in the present legal framework; reduction of provisions; clarity, unambiguousness and manageability; to this end, calls for the incorporation of the Rules for Participation into the body of the Financial Regulation;
6. ugotavlja, da zasebni sektor zaradi zapletenih in dolgotrajnih pravil o sodelovanju, visokih stroškov za osebje in pretirane birokracije le malo sodeluje v okvirnih programih;
Notes that the participation of the private sector in the FP remains low due to complex and time-consuming rules governing participation, high personnel costs and excessive red tape;
pragmatični premik k upravni in finančni poenostavitvi
A pragmatic shift towards administrative and financial simplification
10. meni, da se morata spremljanje in finančni nadzor EU, ki ju izvajata Komisija in urad OLAF, usmeriti predvsem na varovanje javnih sredstev ter boj proti goljufijam, pri tem pa jasno razlikovati med goljufijo in napakami; v zvezi s tem meni, da je nujno treba oblikovati jasnejšo definicijo napak v vseh zavezujočih pravnih dokumentih, vključno z mehanizmi za ugotavljanje napak, da ne bi prihajalo do različnih razlag; zato poziva k podrobni analizi in sporočanju o napakah ter k ukrepom za odpravo slednjih;
Considers that EU monitoring and financial control carried out by the Commission and OLAF should be primarily aimed at safeguarding public funds and combating fraud, whilst distinguishing clearly between fraud and errors; in that regard considers it necessary to establish a clearer definition of 'errors' in all binding legal documents, including the mechanisms for the establishment of errors as opposed to differing interpretations; calls, therefore, for thorough analysis and communication of errors and remedial actions relating thereto;
13. zahteva, da se upravičence, ki prejmejo nepovratna sredstva v okviru OP, obvesti o zadevnih revizijskih strategijah Komisije; priporoča, da se te strategije razširjajo prek nacionalnih kontaktnih oseb in da vključijo v Cordis;
Requests that beneficiaries who receive grants under FP should be informed about the Commission’s relevant audit strategies; recommends disseminating these strategies via the National Contact Points and including them in Cordis;
Poziva Komisijo, naj si dejavno prizadeva za zahteve Parlamenta, opredeljene v sklepih o razrešnici za leti 2007 in 2008, zlasti glede oblikovanja konkretnih predlogov o poenostavitvi izračuna povprečnih stroškov za osebje in uporabe teh predlogov v praksi;
Urges the Commission to actively pursue Parliament's requests as raised in its discharge decisions for the years 2007 and 2008, in particular for concrete proposals to be made on simplifying the calculation of average personnel cost and for these proposals to be applied;
20. priznava, da zmanjšanje velikosti na manjše konzorcije, kjer je to mogoče, prispeva k poenostavitvi postopkov, skrajšuje časovni obseg projektov ter zmanjšuje upravne stroške;
Acknowledges that reducing the size to smaller consortia, whenever possible, contributes to simplifying the process , shortening the calendar of the projects and reducing administrative costs;
29. poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi natančnejši, skladnejši in preglednejši poslovnik za revizije, vključno s pravili in načeli za zagotovitev spoštovanja pravic pregledanih subjektov in mnenja vseh strani, in poroča o razmerju med stroški in koristmi pregledov;
Asks the Commission to present more precise, consistent and transparent rules of procedure for audits, including rules and principles ensuring that the rights of the audited body are respected and that all parties are heard, and to report on the cost/benefit ratio of the audits;
31. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi pravno varnost, tako da ne uporablja strožje definicije pravil o sodelovanju za nazaj in da od sodelujočih ne zahteva ponovnega izračunavanja izkazov stroškov, ki so jih službe Komisije že odobrile, ter tako zmanjša potrebo po naknadnih pregledih in popravke za nazaj; poziva Komisijo, naj hitro in premišljeno razreši prejšnje situacije, ki so nastale pri potekajočih pregledih, ter pri tem spoštuje načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja; priporoča, da bi spore glede prejšnjih situacij razrešili z dogovorom med vsemi stranmi, ki bi na primer temeljil na neodvisni ponovni reviziji in/ali s posredovanjem neodvisnega ad hoc posrednika;
Calls on the Commission to provide legal certainty by refraining from applying a stricter definition of the rules for participation retroactively and by refraining from asking recipients to recalculate financial statements already approved by Commission services, hence reducing the need for ex-post audits and retroactive corrections; asks the Commission rapidly to resolve prior situations arising from inspections in progress, acting with discernment and respect for the principles of sound financial management; recommends that disputes regarding such prior situations be resolved by agreement between all parties, based for example on an independent re-audit and/or with the intervention of an ad hoc independent mediator;
KORENIT PREMIK K IZBOLJŠANJU KAKOVOSTI, DOSTOPNOSTI IN PREGLEDNOSTI
A radical shift towards improv ing quality, accessibility and transparency
(a) Premik k „pristopu, ki temelji na znanosti”
( a) Moving to a ‘ science-based ’ approach
(b) Optimalna izraba časa
( b) Optimising time
39. ga skrbi, da sedaj obdobje od predlaganega roka do podpisa pogodbe (čas pred pogodbo) v povprečju še vedno predolgo traja, med različnimi službami Komisije pa so neskladnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj skrajša čas do pogodbe največ na 6 mesecev in določi ustrezne roke za ocenjevanje in pogajanje o pogodbi na podlagi sistema referenčnih vrednosti;
Expresses its concern that current average time from proposal deadline to signed contract (time-to-contract) is still too long, with discrepancies within different services of the Commission; calls on the Commission to shorten time-to-contract to maximum 6 months and to set appropriate deadlines for evaluation and contract negotiation, based on a benchmark system;
(c) Premik k pristopu, ki je glede dostopnosti usmerjen k uporabniku
( c) Shifting to a ‘ user-centred ’ approach in terms of access
51. pozdravlja pilotni projekt Komisije o odprtem dostopu, katerega namen je izboljšanje dostopa do rezultatov raziskav prek sistema Cordis in spodbujanja znanstvenikov, da svoje raziskave shranijo v arhivu;
Welcomes the Commission’s Open Access Pilot, which aims at improving access to the results of research both through the Cordis system and through encouraging scientists to register their research in a repository;
Sinergije programov in instrumentov
Synergies of programmes and instruments
56. obžaluje izredno povečanje števila raziskovalnih organizacij, modelov sodelovanja in mehanizmov upravljanja, pa tudi zapletenost, ki izhaja iz tega in proračunskemu organu povzroča težave s preglednostjo ter ustvarja razlike v obravnavanju upravičencev;
Regrets the extreme multiplication of research bodies, cooperation models and management mechanisms and the resultant complexity, which creates problems of transparency in relation to the budgetary authority and differences in the treatment of beneficiaries;
Česa se je mogoče naučiti za prihodnji, OSMI OKVIRNI PROGRAM
Lessons to be drawn for the future FP8
62. poziva Komisijo, naj oceni učinkovitost vsakega posameznega instrumenta znotraj vsakega programa glede na doseganje specifičnih političnih ciljev, in poziva k zmanjšanju raznolikosti instrumentov, če ni jasnega dokaza za njihovo učinkovitost ali njihov posebni prispevek, hkrati pa ohrani dovolj prilagodljivosti, da ohrani posebnosti projektov;
Invites the Commission to assess the effectiveness of each individual instrument, within each programme, towards the achievement of specific policy goals, and calls for a reduction in the diversity of instruments whenever effectiveness or distinctive contribution is not clearly demonstrated, whilst maintaining enough flexibility to accommodate projects’ specificities;
64. meni, da bi bilo treba v osmem okvirnem programu dati prednost pionirskim raziskavam obenem pa upoštevati celotno verigo inovacij prek pionirskih raziskav, tehnološkega razvoja, predstavitev, razširjanja, vrednotenja rezultatov in hitrega prenosa rezultatov raziskav na trge;
Believes that FP8 should focus on frontier research while taking into consideration the whole chain of innovation through frontier research, technological development, demonstration, dissemination, valorisation of results and rapid integration of research results into markets;
66. poziva Komisijo, naj objavi analizo ravni sodelovanja različnih držav članic v sedmem okvirnem programu in upošteva zaključke, da bi zagotovila uravnotežen razvoj raziskav v vseh državah članicah v osmem;
Asks the Commission to publish an analysis of the participation levels of different Member States in FP7 and to take the conclusions into account in order to ensure a balanced research development across the Member States in FP8;
Znanost, izobraževanje in inovacije so stebri gospodarske rasti in ustvarjanja delovnih mest.
Science, education and innovation are pillars of economic growth and job creation.
Evropa mora vlagati v inovacije, če naj razvija nove proizvode in storitve.
Europe must invest in innovation if it is to develop new products and services.
Ti bodo ustvarili nove vire zaposlitve in rasti, kar bo pripomoglo, da bo Evropa postala konkurenčnejša in bo izboljšala kakovost življenja svojih državljanov.
These will create new sources of employment and growth, something that will both render Europe more competitive and improve its quality of life.
Za inovacije pa so potrebne raziskave.
Innovation, however, requires research.
Raziskave in inovacije so v osrčju pobude Evropske unije Evropa 2020.
Research and innovation are at the heart of the European Union’s Europe 2020 initiative.
Obseg evropskih raziskovalnih in inovacijskih programov, zlasti okvirnega programa za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti, se je z leti povečal tako glede števila prijav kot velikosti proračunov.
The European Research and Innovation programmes, in particular the Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities, have grown in scope over the years both in terms of their applications and the size of their budgets.
Hkrati z večjim številom prijav za financiranje so se, da bi se zagotovila pravilna uporaba sredstev EU, povečali tudi nadzorni mehanizmi.
The increase in the number of applications for funding has been met with a parallel growth in control mechanisms in an attempt to ensure the proper use of EU funds.
Več pravil in upravnih postopkov pa pomeni, da se je vedno težje z zaupanjem lotiti postopka.
More rules and administrative procedures, however, have meant that it is increasingly difficult to approach the process with confidence.
Zlasti je spoprijemanje s to zapletenostjo težavno za manjše organizacije – mala in srednja podjetja, novoustanovljena podjetja s področja visoke tehnologije, univerze in raziskovalni centri,
It is particularly difficult for smaller organisations – SMEs, high tech start ups and smaller institutes, universities and research centres – to cope with this complexity.
Skupnost raziskovalcev nujno poziva k usklajevanju pravil in postopkov ter splošni poenostavitvi zahtev o finančni odgovornosti.
The research community urgently calls for a harmonization of the rules and procedures and a general simplification of the financial accountability requirements.
Nedavno je 13.000 raziskovalcev podpisalo peticijo, s katero so zahtevali bolj poenostavljeno in zaupanja vredno financiranje raziskav v EU.
Recently, 13.000 researchers put their name to a petition requiring more simplification and trust in EU research funding.
Med raziskovalci, akademiki in predstavniki industrije je to splošna sodba.
This is a generalized feeling amongst researchers, academics and industry members.
Prav gotovo je treba poenostaviti mehanizme, ki se uporabljajo v okvirnih programih za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti, sedmega in osmega okvirnega programa ter vseh znanstvenih in inovacijskih programih Skupnosti.
It is certainly necessary to simplify the mechanisms involved in the Framework Programmes for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities, FP7 and FP8 and all the European Commission Science and Innovation programmes.
Sedanji sistem bi bilo treba nadomestiti s sistemom, ki prosilcem namenja več zaupanja.
The current system should be replaced by a system that places greater trust in the applicants.
Možno bi bilo poenostaviti spremljanje finančnih in upravnih vidikov za projekte ob hkratnem povečanju postopka znanstvenega in tehnološkega ocenjevanja.
A way ahead would be to simplify the monitoring of financial and administrative aspects to projects whilst reinforcing the scientific and technological assessment process.
Ob tem bi bilo treba predvideti medsebojni pregled ter uporabo ocenjevalnih meril na podlagi odličnosti.
This supposes peer review and, with it, the application of excellence based criteria to assessment.
Seveda so vse finančne transakcije do neke mere tvegane, a prekomerna zaskrbljenost zaradi nadzora nad tveganjem prek upravnega nadzora lahko dejansko poveča skupne stroške postopka.
Of course, all financial transactions involve a degree of risk but excessive concern about controlling this risk through administrative supervision can actually increase the overall cost of the process.
Možno bi torej bilo, prvič, dopustiti višjo raven tveganja (in tako racionalizirati upravni nadzor), medtem ko bi, drugič, namenili več zaupanja znanstvenikom in poslovni skupnosti.
It should be possible to, firstly, tolerate higher levels of risk (thus streamlining bureaucratic control) whilst, secondly, placing more confidence in the scientific and business community.
Uravnotežiti je treba zaupanje in nadzor – med tveganjem in nevarnostmi, ki jih to pomeni – ter zagotoviti dobro finančno upravljanje sredstev EU za raziskave.
It is necessary to strike a balance between trust and control – between risk taking and the dangers that risk involves – in ensuring the sound financial management of EU research funds.
Obstaja resnična zahteva po izboljšanju in poenostavitvi financiranja in upravljanja raziskav.
There is a real demand for improvement and streamlining of research funding and administration.
Pravila in postopki za različne instrumente okvirnega programa za različne vrste institucij (univerze, raziskovalni centri, industrija ter mala in srednja podjetja) in za različne vrste dejavnosti (npr. upravljanje, raziskave, predstavitvene dejavnosti) so sedaj različni.
At present, there are different rules and procedures for different instruments of the Framework Programme, for different kinds of institution (universities, research centres, industry and SMEs) and for different types of activity (e.g. management, research, demonstration).
Ta trirazsežnostna matrica (instrumenti, institucije in dejavnosti) je zajeta v številnih koncentričnih plasteh pravil in postopkov.
This three-dimension matrix (instruments, institutions and activities) is contained within a number of concentric layers of rules and procedures.
Te plasti so sestavljene iz pravil za sodelovanje, specifičnih programov, finančne uredbe, dopustnega tveganja za napake ter kadrovskih pravil, ki neposredno ali posredno vplivajo na okvirni program.
This layers are made up of rules of participation, specific programmes, financial regulation, tolerable risk of error and staff regulation that directly or in an indirectly influence the Framework Programme.
Poročevalka pozdravlja sporočilo „Poenostavitev izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov”.
The rapporteur welcomes the communication ‘Simplifying the Implementation of the Research Framework Programmes’.
To določa resen in ustvarjalen načrt za reformo, ki se odziva na težave, pred katerimi se znajdejo sodelujoči v raziskovalnih okvirnih programih.
This sets out a serious and creative plan for a reform addressing many of the difficulties experienced by participants in the research Framework Programs.
Vendar je odnos med predlaganimi spremembami in sedanjo finančno uredbo nejasen.
However, the relation of the proposed changes to the existing financial regulation is unclear.
Nekateri ukrepi, ki jih predlaga Komisija, zahtevajo spremembe finančne uredbe.
Some of the measures proposed by the Commission require changes in the financial regulation.
Za druge so potrebne spremembe pravil za sodelovanje ali pravil specifičnih programov okvirnega programa.
Others require changes in the rules for participation or in the rules of the specific programmes of the Framework Programme.
Nazadnje, za nekatere ukrepe so potrebne vsesplošne spremembe ali pa sploh niso potrebne.
Finally, some measures require changes across the board or no changes at all.
Drugič, poročevalka je zaskrbljena zaradi povezave med financiranjem in rezultati.
Secondly, the rapporteur is concerned about the link between funding and results.
Po eni strani se ceni odprtost Evropske komisije, da pretehta pravila financiranja svojih raziskovalnih programov.
On the one hand, the openness of the European Commission to reconsidering the funding rules of its research programs is appreciated.
Vendar je treba spremembe obravnavati skrbno in premišljeno ter upoštevati finančne in upravne nagibe upravičencev in posledice zanje, pa tudi morebiten vpliv na kakovost raziskav in inovacij.
However, changes are to be considered carefully and thoughtfully, taking into account not only financial and administrative motives and consequences for beneficiaries, but also the possible impact on quality of research and innovation itself.
Poročevalka je tudi zaskrbljena, da bi izbira financiranja, ki temelji na rezultatih, lahko privedla do manj tveganih projektov in se približala tržnim raziskavam.
The rapporteur is also concerned that the option for result-based funding might lead to less risky projects and more close to market research.
Evropa potrebuje več inovacij, kot podlago zanje pa je treba ohraniti pionirske raziskave.
Europe needs more innovation but we have to maintain frontier research as the basis for innovation.
Poleg tega brez odličnosti v raziskavah ni inovacij.
Moreover without excellence in research there is no innovation.
Poročevalka vztrajno poziva k poenostavitvi dostopa do financiranja raziskav.
The rapporteur strongly urges the simplification of access to funding for research.
Treba je razviti kulturo vzajemnega zaupanja pri vseh zainteresiranih straneh.
It is necessary to develop a culture of reciprocal confidence involving all stakeholders.
To bo okrepilo raziskave in inovacije ter pripomoglo, da bo Evropa privlačnejša za življenje in delo.
This will enhance research and innovation whilst making Europe a more attractive place to live and work
Posledično je to poročilo resnično zelo pomembno in nujno.
As a result, this report has genuine relevance and urgency.
Še posebej ob pravem času prihaja, saj smo tik pred začetkom vmesne ocene sedmega okvirnega programa in začetka priprav na osmi okvirni program.
It is particularly timely, given that we are now just about to begin the interim evaluation of the FP7 and to start on the preparation for the FP8.
Namen poročila je zagotoviti trdno podlago, na kateri lahko nato gradimo.
The report is intended to provide a firm foundation upon which we can subsequently build.
Zmanjšanje zapletenosti in poenostavitev financiranja raziskav v EU bi morali pozitivno vplivati predvsem na zainteresirane strani.
The reduction of the complexity and simplification of the EU research funding landscape should have a positive impact mainly on the stakeholders.
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji o razrešnici za leto 2007 opozoril na povečanje raznolikosti.
The European Parliament, in its discharge resolution for 2007, drew attention to the increase in diversity.
Pozval je tudi k oceni težav, ki jih imajo upravičenci, med katerimi je pomanjkanje preglednosti.
It also called for an assessment of the problems for the beneficiaries, including lack of transparency.
Postopek poenostavitve bi moral udeležencem omogočiti stabilnost in pravno varnost.
The simplification process should provide stability and legal certainty for the participants.
Zato je za poenostavitev zahtev o finančni odgovornosti potreben pristop z večjim zaupanjem, ki dopušča večjo stopnjo tveganja, v financiranju evropskih raziskav.
Therefore, the simplification of financial accountability requires a more trust-based and risk-tolerant approach in European research funding.
To pomeni tudi sprejetje običajnih računovodskih in upravljavskih načel in praks upravičenca, če so v skladu z nacionalnimi organi in so jih ti potrdili.
This involves acceptance of the usual accounting and management principles and practices of the beneficiary provided they are in accordance with and certified by national authorities.
Za vsak ukrep je treba določiti, ali je treba spremeniti finančno uredbo, pravila za sodelovanje ali specifične programe ali ne.
For each measure, it is necessary to stipulate whether a change in the financial regulation or in the rules for participation or in the specific programmes is required or not.
Poleg tega se je treba dogovoriti, če bodo ukrepi veljali za sedmi okvirni program ali samo za osmega.
Moreover it is necessary to stipulate if the measures are to be applied to FP7 or only to FP8.
Poročevalka se pri sedmem okvirnem programu zavzema za postopno uvedbo teh sprememb, da bi se izognili nenadnim ostrim spremembam v enem okvirnem programu.
For FP7, the rapporteur is in favour of phasing these changes in gradually in order to avoid sudden drastic changes in direction within the same framework program.
Poročevalka tudi podpira zamisel o zmanjšanju kombiniranja metod izračunavanja stopenj financiranja in posrednih stroškov povprek v finančnih shemah.
The rapporteur also supports the idea of reducing the combination of funding rates and indirect costs calculation methods across financing schemes.
Vendar bi morali biti modeli za izračunavanje stopenj financiranja in posrednih stroškov različni za univerze, raziskovalne organizacije in industrije.
However, the funding rates and indirect costs calculation models should be different for universities, research organizations and industry.
Razlog pa je, da se stroški med temi različnimi subjekti znatno razlikujejo.
The reason for this is that costs differ considerably between these kinds of entities.
Stopnje financiranja bi morale biti različne za različne vrste dejavnosti.
Funding rates should be different for different types of activities.
Usklajevanje pravil bi moralo biti usmerjeno predvsem na različne instrumente.
Harmonisation of rules should be mainly targeted at the different instruments.
Poleg tega poročevalka meni, da bodo manjši konzorciji in uporaba preprostejših osrednjih mehanizmov poenostavili postopke.
Furthermore, the rapporteur is of the opinion that smaller consortia and the use of simpler central mechanisms will lead to simplified procedures.
Jasno je treba opredeliti tudi terminologijo, ki se uporablja za kompleksne koncepte, kot so pavšalni zneski in upravičeni stroški, da se izognemo različnim razlagam.
Also the terminology in use on complex concepts such as lump sums and eligible costs should be clearly defined so as to avoid different interpretations.
Pojasnitev upravičenih stroškov, kot so davki, je izredno pomembna.
Clarification on the eligible costs such as taxes is of utmost importance.
Prav tako je pomembno dosledno izvajanje pravil v vseh službah Evropske komisije in pri različnih pregledih.
So too is consistency in the application of rules across the European Commission services and in different audits.
KORENIT PREMIK K IZBOLJŠANJU KAKOVOSTI, DOSTOPNOSTI IN PREGLEDNOSTI
A radical shift towards the improvement of quality, accessibility and transparency