natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
B. ker je v okolju, zlasti v tleh in vodi, še vedno mogoče najti neželene količine nekaterih pesticidov; ker je v kmetijskih pridelkih še vedno mogoče najti ostanke, ki presegajo regulativne mejne vrednosti,
B. whereas undesirable amounts of certain pesticides can still be found in the environment, in particular in soil and water; whereas residues exceeding regulatory limit values are still found in agricultural produce,
C. čeprav ni mogoče zanikati prednosti uporabe pesticidov in njihove vloge pri zagotavljanju učinkovite in trajnostne konkurenčne kmetijske proizvodnje v Evropi, mora biti širša javnost bolje obveščena o možnih nevarnostih za zdravje in okolje ter kratko- in dolgoročnih škodljivih učinkih zaradi njihove uporabe,
C. whereas although the benefits which derive from the use of pesticides and the role they play in ensuring an efficient and sustainable competitive agricultural production in Europe are undeniable, the general public should be better informed on the possible health and environmental risks and short and long-term adverse effects related to their use;
D. ker bi morala biti nadaljnja uporaba pesticidov mogoča le ob ohranitvi previdnostnega načela glede zdravja ljudi ter varstva vodnega in kopenskega ekosistema; ker to pomeni, da se pesticidi ne bi smeli uporabljati, dokler niso opravljene vse presoje vplivov v zvezi z zdravjem in okoljem; ker bi bilo treba spodbuditi primerjavo podatkov in dobre prakse pri zmanjševanju uporabe v različnih državah članicah ter to upoštevati kot referenčno točko,
D. whereas continued use of pesticides should be possible only if the precautionary principle is upheld with regard to both human health and the protection of the water and land ecosystem; whereas this means that pesticides should not be used before all impact assessments regarding health and the environment have been carried out; and whereas comparing data and best practices in use reduction in the different Member States should be encouraged and taken into account as a point of reference,
E. ker ni preglednega sistema za poročanje in spremljanje uporabe pesticidov in vrednosti njihovih ostankov v proizvodih, ravno tako pa niso določeni ustrezni kazalci,
E. whereas a transparent system for reporting and monitoring of pesticide use and residue levels in products, including the development of appropriate indicators, is lacking;
UL L 123, 24.4.1998, str.
OJ L 123, 24.4.1998, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2006/140/ES (UL L 414, 30.12.2006, str.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2006/140/EC (OJ L 414, 30.12.2006, p.
78). , saj predstavljajo podobno nevarnost za zdravje ljudi in okolje, ter poziva Komisijo, naj v področje tematske strategije čim prej vključi tudi druge biocide;
78). within the scope of the Thematic Strategy, as they pose similar risks to human health and the environment, and urges the Commission to extend the scope of the Thematic Strategy to include other biocides as soon as possible;
8. priporoča, da prodaja in distribucija pesticidov potekata pod nadzorom usposobljenega strokovnjaka ali izvedenca in da se te transakcije vnesejo v register, da se zagotovi ustrezen nadzor nad dajanjem teh proizvodov v promet in njihovo uporabo;
Recommends that the sale and distribution of pesticides be performed under the supervision of a qualified professional or practitioner, and that those transactions be recorded in a register to ensure adequate control of the marketing and use of such products;
11. poudarja pomen vloge medijev pri obveščanju širše javnosti, zlasti pa nepoklicnih uporabnikov pesticidov o vprašanjih s področja pesticidov in predlaga pripravo kampanj za obveščanje in večjo ozaveščenost javnosti;
Emphasises the importance of the media's role in informing the general public, and non-professional users of pesticides in particular, about pesticide issues; and suggests that public information and awareness-raising campaigns be devised;
Evropska strategija o zdravju in okolju, KOM(2003)0338 , str.
European Environment and Health Strategy, COM(2003)0338 , p.
22. poudarja, da so zarodki, dojenčki, otroci in nosečnice, starejši, kronično bolni in tisti z zdravstvenimi težavami bolj kot ostalo prebivalstvo občutljivi za pesticide in jim izpostavljeni, zlasti učinkom kopičenja različnih vrst pesticidov;
Points out that foetuses, infants, children as well as pregnant women, the elderly, the chronically sick and those with pre-existing medical problems are more vulnerable and more exposed to pesticides, especially to cumulative effects of different types of pesticides, than the rest of the population;
26. poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj z državami članicami in industrijo uvede ukrepe proti uvozu in trženju ponarejenih in/ali nedovoljenih fitofarmacevtskih sredstev;
Calls on the Commission, working together with the Member States and the industry, to take measures to prevent the import and marketing of counterfeit and/or unauthorised PPPs;
33. poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši usklajevanje mejnih vrednosti ostankov na ravni Skupnosti, saj sedaj konkurenčni pogoji v EU niso enaki za vse, kar ovira trgovino in bega potrošnike;
Calls on the Commission to speed up Community harmonisation of maximum residue levels, as the current situation means that there is an uneven playing field within the EU, hampering trade and confusing consumers;
39. opozarja, da je treba širiti kmetijske prakse, ki spodbujajo uporabo manjših količin pesticidov (med drugim integrirano pridelavo in ekološko kmetijstvo), kar bo prispevalo k splošnemu zmanjšanju uporabe pesticidov;
Points to the need for the dissemination of farming practices promoting the use of lower pesticide doses (among other things, integrated production and organic farming), which will contribute to an overall decrease in pesticide use;
41. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo dovolj sredstev za raziskave odpornosti, za gojenje in zagotavljanje širokega spektra kulturnih rastlin z različno odpornostjo, za raziskave kolobarjenja in načinov obdelovanja zemlje zaradi zatiranja škodljivcev in rastlinskih bolezni ter za inovacije na področju zatiranja škodljivcev, skupaj z nekemičnimi možnostmi;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make adequate resources available for resistance research, for the cultivation and supply of a wide range of crops with various resistance characteristics, for research into crop rotation and soil cultivation methods to combat pests and plant diseases and for innovations in the area of plant protection, including non-chemical alternatives;
43. poziva k zagotovitvi sredstev Skupnosti za predelavo pesticidov, glede na to, da se v EU še vedno več kot 200 000 ton pesticidov hrani v podzemnih skladiščih ter na odprtih odlagališčih;
Calls for Community funding to be provided for the recycling of pesticides, given that within the EU more than 200 000 tonnes of pesticides are still being stored in both underground dumps and open-air stockpiles;
45. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva izjemno zaskrbljujoče vprašanje umrljivosti domačih čebel; gre za problem, ki je povezan z uporabo nekaterih sistemskih insekticidov (ki vsebujejo aktivni snovi fipronil in imidaclopride) za obdelavo semen sončnic in koruze;
Urges the Commission to take into account the extremely worrying issue of mortality amongst domestic bees - a problem associated with the use of certain systemic insecticides (containing the active substances Fipronil and Imidaclopride) in order to treat sunflower and maize seeds;
Julija 2006 je Komisija Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu predložila tematsko strategijo o trajnostni rabi pesticidov, skupaj s predlogom direktive o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti za doseganje trajnostne uporabe pesticidov ter predlogom uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet.
In July 2006 the Commission submitted a Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides to the Council and the European Parliament, along with a Proposal for a Directive establishing a framework for Community Action to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides and a Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market.
Cilj strategije je zmanjšati celotno tveganje in škodljive učinke na človekovo zdravje in okolje zaradi uporabe pesticidov.
The objective of the strategy is to reduce the overall risks and negative impacts on human health and the environment from the use of pesticides.
Strategija izvira iz šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa (sprejetega julija 2002), ki poziva, naj se pesticidi uporabljajo trajnostno, da se zmanjšajo škodljivi učinki na človekovo zdravje in okolje.
The strategy stems from the Sixth Environment Action Programme, (adopted in July 2002) which calls for pesticides being used in a sustainable way so as to minimise negative impacts for human health and the environment.
Treba je opozoriti, da je najpomembnejši cilj te politike varovanje zdravja in okolja.
It has to be acknowledged that the most important goal of this policy is the protection of health and environment.
Veliko truda je bilo vloženega za zmanjšanje tveganja zaradi uporabe pesticidov, vendar se v tleh in vodi še vedno pojavljajo neželene količine.
Many efforts have been done in order to minimize the risks linked to the use of pesticides but unwanted amounts still occur in soil and water.
Ostanke pesticidov najdemo v vseh habitatih, 44 % vzorcev sadja vsebuje pesticide, pri 5,5 % ostanki presegajo mejno vrednost.
Pesticides residues are present in all habitats, 44% of sampled fruit is contaminated with pesticides, 5,5% above the maximum residue level.
Žalostno je, da se s tem vprašanjem v državah članicah v glavnem ukvarjajo ministrstva za kmetijstvo, ministrstva za okolje pa prispevajo le malo.
It is rather disappointing to see that the subject is mostly dealt with the Ministries for Agriculture in the Member States with very little input from the Ministries for the Environment.
Še vedno je nesporno, da je na področju pesticidov potrebna učinkovita zakonodaja.
The need for an effective legislation in the area of pesticide use remains undisputed.
Tematska strategija zapolnjuje vrzel med dvema fazama, ki sta pravno že urejeni – fazo dajanja na trg in koncem življenjskega cikla (mejne vrednosti ostankov in zakonodaja o odpadkih).
The Thematic Strategy "fills the gap" between two phases which are already regulated- the phase of placing on the market and the end of the life cycle (maximum residue limits and waste legislation).
Tematska strategija ureja obdobje uporabe.
The Thematic Strategy regulates the use phase.
Poročevalka sicer priznava, da je uporaba pesticidov potrebna za kmetijsko produktivnost, vendar meni, da obstajajo drugi načini za zmanjševanje uporabe pesticidov, ne da bi se pri tem zmanjšala produktivnost kmetijskega sektorja.
While acknowledging that pesticides use is necessary for the agricultural productivity, your rapporteur is of the opinion that there are other ways how to reduce the use of pesticides without decreasing the productivity of the agricultural sector.
Druge možnosti bi lahko bile ekološko kmetovanje, kolobarjenje, pletje in morebitna delna ali popolna nadomestitev pesticidov z gensko spremenjenimi organizmi.
Organic farming, crop rotation, weeding or possible substitution/partial substitution of pesticides by GMOs could be alternatives.
Poročevalka ne želi takoj nadomestiti pesticidov z gensko spremenjenimi organizmi.
Your rapporteur does not want to immediately substitute pesticides by GMOs.
Zato bi bile nadaljnje raziskave zelo pomembne.
Therefore, it might be vital to conduct more research.
Naslov Tematska strategija o trajnostni rabi pesticidov je lahko zavajajoč, saj so v strategiji obravnavana le fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki predstavljajo le del skupine pesticidov.
Because the title of the "Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides" might be misleading due to the fact that it only covers plant protection products, which form just part of the pesticides group.
Zato je treba v področje tematske strategije čim prej vključiti tudi biocide.
Therefore, the scope of the Thematic Strategy should be broadened in order to cover biocides as soon as possible.
Temelj celotnega procesa je uvedba nacionalnih akcijskih načrtov.
The cornerstone of the whole process is the introduction of the National Action Plans (NAPs).
Vendar je obžalovanja vredno, da Komisija v nacionalne akcijske načrte ni uvrstila kvantitativnih meril in se je osredotočila samo na zmanjševanje nevarnosti in tveganja zaradi pesticidov ter odvisnosti od njih.
It is, however, regrettable that the Commission opted for the exclusion of the quantitative criteria in the NAPs and concentrated solely on the "reduction of hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides".
To je nejasna opredelitev, ki držav članic ne bo prisilila, da bi zmanjšale količino uporabljenih pesticidov ali nadomestile nevarnejše pesticide z manj nevarnimi.
This is a vague term which will not put pressure on the Member States to lower the amount of pesticides used or to substitute the more dangerous pesticides by less dangerous ones.
Nacionalni akcijski načrti morajo biti konkretni in s pomočjo najbolj primernega kazalnika določiti, kako zmanjšati nevarnosti in tveganja zaradi pesticidov ter odvisnost od njih.
NAPs have to be concrete and specify by the most appropriate indicator how the hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides will be reduced.
Zato poročevalka meni, naj Komisija v nacionalnih akcijskih načrtih združi kvantitativna merila z odpravo nevarnosti in tveganja zaradi pesticidov ter odvisnosti od njih.
Therefore, your rapporteur is of an opinion that the Commission should combine the elimination of hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides with quantitative criteria in the National Action Plans.
Pri tem je za zgled lahko pozitivna izkušnja Danske, kjer uporabljajo indeks pogostosti nanašanja.
In this regards positive experience from Denmark with the use of frequency of application index could be looked at as an example.
Zelo žalostno je, da čeprav je Komisija kot glavni cilj strategije zastavila zmanjšanje negativnih učinkov uporabe pesticidov na človekovo zdravje, v tematski strategiji ni nobenega člena, kjer bi bilo to vprašanje posebej obravnavano, zdravje pa je obravnavano le obrobno.
It is very disappointing to see that even though the Commission recognized the reduction of negative impacts from the use of pesticides on human health as the main objective of the strategy, one doesn't find an article in the thematic strategy specifically dealing with this issue and that health is dealt with only marginally.
Tematska strategija ne obravnava vprašanja, da pesticidi povzročajo različne imunske in nevrotoksične motnje in celo raka.
Thematic strategy fails to address that pesticides cause several immunological defects, neurotoxic disorders or even cancer.
Tudi nosečnice, otroci in nerojeni otroci niso obravnavani kot najbolj ranljive skupine.
It fails to recognize that pregnant women, children and foetuses are the most vulnerable group.
Vendar poročevalka pozdravlja številne ukrepe, ki jih uvaja Komisija, podpira načelo substitucije, prepoved škropljenja z letali, prepoved znižanja stopnje davka na dodano vrednost, večje varstvo vodnega okolja ter opredelitev območij z manjšo ali ničelno uporabo pesticidov.
Your rapporteur, however, welcomes numerous measures introduced by the Commission, supports the substitution principle, ban on aerial spraying, prohibition of reduced VAT rates, enhanced protection of the aquatic environment, designation of zones with reduced or zero pesticide use.
Vendar je treba določiti varovalne pasove, da se javnost zaščiti pred izpostavljenostjo.
However, "buffer zones" should be established in order to protect the general public from the exposure.
o tematski strategiji o trajnostni rabi pesticidov
on the thematic strategy on the sustainable use of pesticides
4. opozarja, da je treba širiti kmetijske prakse, ki spodbujajo uporabo manjših količin pesticidov (med drugim integrirano pridelavo in ekološko kmetijstvo), kar bo prispevalo k splošnemu zmanjšanju uporabe pesticidov;
Points to the need for the dissemination of farming practices promoting the use of lower pesticide doses (among other things, integrated production and organic farming), which will contribute to an overall decrease in pesticide use;
8. poudarja, da zakonodaja Skupnosti ne sme določati količinskih omejitev, saj bi to kmete in druge akterje lahko spodbudilo k uporabi snovi, ki se uporabljajo v manjših količinah, a so nevarnejše;
Emphasises that Community legislation should not set general quantitative restrictions, as this could encourage farmers and other operators to use substances which are less voluminous but more hazardous;
10. poziva, naj predlagani predpisi kmetov še bolj ne obremenijo z nepotrebno birokracijo, ter meni, da je treba obsežni proces harmonizacije izkoristiti kot priložnost za poenostavitev nadzornih postopkov, ne da bi pri tem zmanjšali njihovo učinkovitost;
Urges that the proposed provisions should not increase the burden on farmers by creating unnecessary red tape, but that instead the opportunity offered by the comprehensive harmonisation process should be taken to simplify monitoring procedures without making them less effective;
13. poziva, naj imajo prostovoljni in podporni ukrepi prednost pred obvezujočimi; o pravem razmerju instrumentov naj odločajo države članice, in sicer po analizi lokalnih razmer v okviru nacionalnih akcijskih načrtov;
Urges that voluntary and supportive measures should be employed in preference to binding provisions; it is for the Member States to take a decision on the correct mix of instruments, after analysing the local situation in the context of national action plans;
16. poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši usklajevanje mejnih vrednosti ostankov na ravni Skupnosti, saj sedaj konkurenčni pogoji niso enaki za vse akterje v EU, kar ovira trgovino in bega potrošnike;
Calls on the Commission to speed up Community harmonisation of maximum residue levels, as the current situation means that there is an uneven playing field within the EU, hampering trade and confusing consumers;
19. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo dovolj sredstev za raziskave odpornosti, za gojenje in zagotavljanje širokega spektra kulturnih rastlin z različno odpornostjo, za raziskave kolobarjenja in načinov obdelovanja zemlje zaradi zatiranja škodljivcev in rastlinskih bolezni ter za inovacije na področju zatiranja škodljivcev (skupaj z nekemičnimi možnostmi);
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make adequate resources available for resistance research, for the cultivation and supply of a wide range of crops with various resistance characteristics, for research into crop rotation and soil cultivation methods to combat pests and plant diseases and for innovations in the area of plant protection, including non-chemical alternatives;
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2001/18/ES o namernem sproščanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2001/18/CE concerning the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as regards the implementing powers conferred to the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0920 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0920 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0031/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0031/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0292/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0292/2007 ),
(-1) v odstavku 3 člena 7 se uvodni del nadomesti z naslednjim:
(-1) In Article 7, paragraph 3, the introductory part is replaced by the following:
Komisija odloča o vsakem predlogu.
The Commission shall decide on each proposal.
Ta odločitev se sprejme v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 30(3), saj je namenjena spreminjanju nebistvenih elementov te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo.
This decision shall be taken in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) since it is designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it.
Ta odločitev določa minimalno količino tehničnih informacij iz Priloge III, potrebnih za ovrednotenje kakršnih koli predvidljivih tveganj zaradi sproščanja, še zlasti:“
This decision shall establish the minimum amount of technical information from Annex III necessary for evaluating any foreseeable risks from the release, in particular:"
(1a) v členu 18 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(1a) In Article 18, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Če pristojni organ ali Komisija v skladu s členi 15, 17 in 20 ugovarja in vztraja pri tem, se odločitev sprejme in objavi v 120 dneh.
In cases where an objection is raised and maintained by a competent authority or the Commission in accordance with Articles 15, 17 and 20, a decision shall be adopted and published within 120 days.
Ta odločitev vsebuje enake informacije, kot so naštete v členu 19(3).
This decision shall contain the same information as in Article 19(3).
Sprejme se v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 30(3), saj je namenjena spreminjanju nebistvenih elementov te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo.
It shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) since it is designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it.
Za izračun obdobja 120 dni se ne upošteva obdobja, v katerem Komisija čaka na dodatne informacije, ki jih je morda zahtevala od prijavitelja, ali pa pridobiva mnenje znanstvenega odbora, s katerim se posvetuje po členu 28.
For the purpose of calculating the 120 day period, any period of time during which the Commission is awaiting further information which it may have requested from the notifier or is seeking the opinion of a Scientific Committee which has been consulted in accordance with Article 28 shall not be taken into account.
Komisija v vsaki zahtevi za dodatne informacije navede razloge in pristojne organe obvesti o svojih zahtevah prijavitelju.
The Commission shall state reasons in any request for further information and inform the competent authorities of its requests to the notifier.
Obdobje, v katerem Komisija čaka na mnenje znanstvenega odbora, ne sme presegati 90 dni.
The period of time during which the Commission is awaiting the opinion of the Scientific Committee shall not exceed 90 days.
Čas, ki ga Evropski parlament in Svet potrebujeta za ukrepanje v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 30(3), se ne upošteva.“
The period of time that the European Parliament and the Council take to act in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) shall not be taken into account."
(2a) v členu 21 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(2a) In Article 21, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
Pri proizvodih, namenjenih neposredni predelavi, se odstavek 1 ne uporablja za sledove dovoljenih GSO v deležu, ki ne presega praga 0,9 % ali še manj, pod pogojem, da gre za naključne ali tehnično neizogibne sledove.
For products intended for direct processing, paragraph 1 shall not apply to traces of authorised GMOs in a proportion no higher than 0,9 % or lower thresholds, provided that these traces are adventitious or technically unavoidable.
Komisija določi pragovne vrednosti iz prejšnjega pododstavka.
The Commission shall establish the threshold levels referred to in the previous subparagraph.