natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
DEC 32/2009 z dne 18. septembra 2009. posebnih sredstev za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila v proračun za leto 2009, kot zahteva točka 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006.
DEC 32/2009 of 18 September 2009 in order to enter specific commitment and payment appropriations in the 2009 budget, as required in Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
V skladu z notranjim dogovorom z odborom za zaposlovanje in socialne razmere mora ta sodelovati pri procesu, da bi konstruktivno podprl uporabo Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji.
According to an internal agreement with the Employment and Social Affairs Committee (EMPL), this committee should be associated to the process, in order to provide constructive support and contribution to the implementation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.
Po oceni vlog je odbor Evropskega parlamenta za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve podal stališče o uporabi sredstev sklada, kot je navedeno v priloženem poročilu.
Following the assessment of the requests, the EMPL committee of the European Parliament gave its view on the mobilisation of the Fund, as expressed in the opinion attached to the present report.
Predsednik odbora za proračun
President of the Committee on budgets
Zadeva: Mnenje o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v primerih EGF/2009004 BE/Oost en West Vlaanderen textiles, EGF/2009/005 BE/Limburg textiles in EGF/2009/008 IE/Dell (KOM(2009)515 konč.)
Subject: Opinion on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) for the cases EGF/2009004 BE/Oost en West Vlaanderen textiles, EGF/2009/005 BE/ Limburg textiles and EGF/2009/008 IE/Dell (COM(2009)515 final)
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve in njegova delovna skupina, zadolžena za Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji, sta preučila uporabo sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v primerih EGF/2009/004 BE/Oost en West Vlaanderen textiles, EGF/2009/005 BE/Limburg textiles in EGF/2009/008 IE/Dell 14. in 29. septembra, 20. oktobra ter 3. in 4. novembra 2009.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL) as well as its Working Group on the EGF examined the mobilisation of the EGF for the cases EGF/2009/004 BE/Oost en West Vlaanderen textiles, EGF/2009/005 BE/Limburg textiles and EGF/2009/008 IE/Dell on 14 and 29 September, on 20 October as well as on 3 and 4 November 2009.
Po natančnem pregledu je Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve sprejel naslednje mnenje:
Following this thorough examination, EMPL adopted the following opinion:
Splošna opomba
General remark
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve želi najprej poudariti, da možnost združevanja predlogov sklepa o uporabi sredstev sklada v svežnje (člen 12(3)) ogroža pravico proračunskega organa, da na podlagi lastnih meril preuči posamezno vlogo.
First of all, the EMPL committee would like to stress that the possibility to group proposals for decision on the mobilisation of the fund together into badges (Art. 12§3) puts into jeopardy the right of the budgetary authority to examine each application on the basis of its own merits.
- Zato odbor EMPL poziva Komisijo, naj odslej predloge za odobritev proračunskih sredstev in zahteve za prerazporeditev zneskov v proračunsko vrstico Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji predloži posebej za vsako vlogo.
- Therefore, EMPL asks the Commission to submit from now on the proposals to authorise appropriations and the requests for the transfer of the amount to the EGF budget line separately for every single application.
Odbor EMPL in njegova delovna skupina, zadolžena za ESPG, se v zvezi z zahtevo Belgije strinjata z uporabo sredstev sklada.
EMPL and its Working Group on the EGF are in favour of the mobilisation of the Fund concerning the Belgian request.
Odbor EMPL kljub temu predstavlja nekaj zadržkov, ki pa ne ogrožajo predvidene prerazporeditve sredstev.
Nevertheless, the EMPL committee presents some remarks without, however, putting into question the transfer of the payments.
Premisleki odbora EMPL temeljijo na naslednjem:
The deliberations of the EMPL Committee are based on the following considerations:
- ker gre za prve zahteve, vložene v okviru nove uredbe št. 546/2009, ki spreminja uredbo št. 1927/2006;
- Whereas these requests are the first ones presented under the new Regulation 546/2009 amending Regulation 1927/2006;
- ker scenariji o potrebah po veščinah, predstavljeni v študiji sektorja tekstila, oblačil in usnjenih izdelkov v Evropski uniji, napovedujejo precejšnje znižanje števila zaposlenih v tem sektorju do leta 2020;
- Whereas the skills scenarios presented in the study of the textiles, wearing apparel and leather products sector in the European Union predict a considerable loss of jobs in this sector until 2020;
- ker ni na voljo podrobnih informacij o sodelovanju drugih evropskih skladov pri teh primerih.
- Whereas no detailed information is available on the participation of other European Funds in the cases at hand.
1. pozdravlja vzorno sodelovanje med belgijsko vlado in socialnimi partnerji pri prizadevanjih za pridobitev sredstev iz ESPG in poziva druge države članice k oblikovanju tristranskih delegacij, s katerimi bi skupaj izpopolnili in predložili vloge;
Welcomes the good example of co-operation between the Belgian government and the Social Partners in order to obtain a contribution of the EGF and encourages other Member States to set up tripartite delegations that will elaborate and submit the applications together.
3. ugotavlja, da bi morala Belgija za lažjo predstavo posredovati dodatne informacije o ukrepih, sprejetih za delavce v sektorjih prometa, vzdrževanja in gostinstva, ki so izgubili službo zaradi zmanjšanja števila zaposlenih v tekstilni industriji.
Notes that to complete the overall picture, Belgium should provide additional information on the measures put in place for those workers made redundant in the transport, maintenance and catering sectors following the job losses in the textile industry.
Odbor EMPL in njegova delovna skupina, zadolžena za ESPG, se v zvezi z zahtevo Irske strinjata z uporabo sredstev sklada.
EMPL and its Working Group on the EGF are in favour of the mobilisation of the EGF concerning the Irish request.
V zvezi s tem odbor EMPL predstavlja nekaj zadržkov, ki pa ne ogrožajo predvidene prerazporeditve sredstev.
In this respect, the EMPL Committee presents some remarks without, however, putting into question the transfer of the payments.
Premisleki odbora EMPL temeljijo na naslednjem:
The deliberations of the EMPL committee are based on the following considerations:
- ob upoštevanju odgovorov komisarjev Neelie Kroes in Vladimirja Špidle na pismo v zvezi z zahtevo Irske, ki jima ga je posredovala predsednica Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve;
- Having regard to the reply by Commissioners Neelie Kroes and Vladimir Špidla to the letter concerning the Irish request addressed to them by the Chairwoman of the EMPL Committee.
- ker vloga ne vsebuje informacij o morebitnem prispevku podjetja Dell ali strukturnih skladov k ukrepom v korist odpuščenih delavcev;
- Whereas the application does not include any information about a possible contribution of the company Dell or of the Structural Funds to the measures in favour of the redundant workers.
- ker je zaradi tega okrog ustanovitve Dellove tovarne na Poljskem, odpuščanj na Irskem in povezave s finančno in gospodarsko krizo precej nejasnosti;
- Whereas, consequently, there is a lack of clarity concerning the establishment of Dell in Poland, the redundancies in Ireland and the link thereof with the financial and economic crisis.
- ker Dell sedaj kupuje konkurenčno podjetje za 3,9 milijarde dolarjev;
- Whereas Dell is presently buying a competitor for 3.9 billion dollars.
- ker ni pojasnjeno, ali je Dell ob naselitvi v Limericku prejel državno pomoč;
- Whereas it has not been clarified whether Dell received state aid from Ireland when settling in Limerick.
- ker ni jasno, ali je Komisija preverila, da je Poljska v izogib ponovitvi te podjetniške strategije zahtevala jamstvo, ki bi dokazovalo, da je bila na Poljskem opravljena trajnostna naložba.
- Whereas it is not clear whether the Commission verified that Poland, in order to avoid a repetition of this corporate strategy, asked for guarantees proving that a sustainable investment in Poland was made.
Zaradi tega Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za proračun, naj kot pristojni odbor v svoj predlog resolucije v zvezi z irskim primerom vključi naslednje pobude:
Therefore, EMPL calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution concerning the Irish case:
3. poudarja, da se ob tej vlogi vzbujajo resnični dvomi o doslednosti okvira za industrijsko politiko v Evropski uniji, ki na več načinov vpliva na izvrševanje Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji;
Underlines that this application provokes serious doubts about the consistency of the framework for industrial policy in the European Union which affects in many ways the implementation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.
Opombe k vsem vlogam:
Remarks on all applications:
V zvezi s tem poslanci niso zadovoljni z enostavno potrditvijo Belgije, da predlagani ukrepi dopolnjujejo druge dejavnosti, ki se sofinancirajo iz strukturnih skladov.
In this respect, Members are not satisfied with the simple confirmation of Belgium that the proposed measures complement other actions co-financed by the Structural Funds.
o prehodnih postopkovnih smernicah za proračunske zadeve zaradi začetka veljave Lizbonske pogodbe
on transitional procedural guidelines on budgetary matters in view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
– having regard to the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community,
– ob upoštevanju Lizbonske pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon (TL),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. maja 2009 o finančnih vidikih Lizbonske pogodbe
– having regard to its resolution of 7 May 2009 on the financial aspects of the Treaty of Lisbon
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0374 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0374 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. marca 2009 o vmesnemu pregledu finančnega okvira 2007–2013
– having regard to its resolution of 25 March 2009 on the Mid-Term Review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0174 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0174 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0045/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7‑0045/2009 ),
A. ker Lizbonska pogodba uvaja pomembne spremembe na finančnem in proračunskem področju, predvsem bo večletni finančni okvir postal pravno zavezujoč akt in bo moral biti upoštevan pri letnem proračunu, odpravljena bo razlika med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki, proračunski postopek pa bo precej poenostavljen,
A. whereas the TL introduces important modifications in financial and budgetary matters, notably by rendering the multiannual financial framework (MFF) a legally binding act with which the annual budget has to comply, by suppressing the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure and by substantially simplifying the budgetary procedure,
B. ker bodo s temi spremembami nekatere določbe medinstitucionalnega sporazuma in finančne uredbe zastarele,
B. whereas these modifications render obsolete some of the provisions of the IIA and of the Financial Regulation,
C. ker bo z njeno veljavo treba hitro sprejeti več pravnih aktov, potrebnih za izvajanje nove "finančne ustave" Unije, predvsem:
C. whereas its entry into force will thus require the rapid adoption of several legal acts necessary to put into practice the new “financial constitution” of the Union, notably:
- sprejeti novo uredbo z večletnim finančnim okvirom;
- the adoption of the new regulation containing the MFF;
- prilagoditi finančno uredbo novim načelom za sprejetje in izvrševanje proračuna;
- the adaptation of the Financial Regulation to the new principles on how to adopt and implement the budget;
- potrditi novi medinstitucionalni sporazum, ki bo vseboval predvsem pravila o sodelovanju institucij med letnim proračunskim postopkom, ki ne bodo vključena v omenjena pravna instrumenta,
- the approval of a new IIA containing mainly rules on the collaboration of the institutions during the annual budgetary procedure that are not included in the two mentioned legal instruments,
D. ker bodo, tudi če bo sprejetje novih instrumentov potekalo nemoteno, potrebna dolga pogajanja, kar lahko traja več mesecev po začetku veljave Lizbonske pogodbe,
D. whereas even if the procedures to adopt these new instruments run smoothly, they will require long negotiations and may last for several months after the entry into force of the TL,
E. ker je priporočljivo, da se za zagotovitev ustrezne uporabe načel Lizbonske pogodbe institucije dogovorijo glede začasnih smernic o izvrševanju proračuna, sprejetju nujnih sprememb proračuna in praktičnih načinih medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja med proračunskim postopkom za leto 2011,
E. whereas in order to ensure the appropriate application of the principles of the TL, it would be advisable for the institutions to agree on some provisional guidelines allowing for the implementation of the budget, for the adoption of amending budgets if it proves indispensible to do so and on the practical modalities of interinstitutional collaboration in the framework of the budgetary procedure for 2011,
F. ker morajo biti te prehodne smernice pripravljene v začetku leta 2010, mora biti dogovor o njih sklenjen na proračunskem spravnem srečanju pred drugo obravnavo Sveta, ki je predvidena za 19. november 2009
F. whereas these transitional guidelines should be in place at the beginning of 2010, which would require them to be agreed at the budgetary conciliation before the second reading of the Council, scheduled for 19 November 2009,
G. ker je parlamentarna delegacija ena od vej proračunskega organa in ker za zagotovitev svojega trdnega položaja v prihodnjih pogajanjih potrebuje jasna navodila na podlagi mandata, ki ga potrdi Parlament,
G. whereas in order to ensure that Parliament's delegation - representing one branch of the budgetary authority - has a solid position for the future negotiations it should be given clear orientations based on a mandate endorsed by Parliament,
2. meni, da se morata obe veji proračunskega organa dogovoriti o prehodnih smernicah za izvrševanje proračuna, predvsem glede sprejetja prerazporeditev, odobritev sprememb proračuna in načel za praktično sodelovanje institucij med letnim proračunskim postopkom, in ki bi bile v uporabi do sprejetja pravnih aktov, nujnih za zagotovitev izvajanja novih pravil, ki jih bo uvedla Lizbonska pogodba;
Considers it necessary for both branches of the budgetary authority to agree on transitional guidelines for the implementation of the budget, notably the adoption of transfers, on the approval of amending budgets and on principles for practical interinstitutional collaboration during the annual budgetary procedure, which would be applicable until the adoption of the legal acts necessary to ensure the implementation of the new rules introduced by the TL is complete;
4. meni, da se prehodni ukrepi v nobenem primeru ne smejo oddaljiti od splošnih načel iz nove pogodbe in prav tako ne smejo vnaprej določati prihodnjih zakonodajnih postopkov, temveč morajo omogočiti obema vejama proračunskega organa pripravo potrebne praktične ureditve do sprejetja zakonodaje;
Considers that in any case transitional measures may neither diverge from the general principles set by the new Treaty nor prejudge the forthcoming legislative procedures, but that they should allow the two arms of the budgetary authority to find the necessary practical arrangements pending the adoption of the legislation;
7. poudarja, da je sedanje število sprememb proračuna preveliko in ga je treba zmanjšati kolikor je to mogoče, da bodo upoštevani pogoji iz člena 37 finančne uredbe glede njihove vložitve; priporoča, da se institucije dogovorijo za določena obdobja v letu, ko se lahko vložijo spremembe proračuna, razen v nujnih primerih;
Stresses that the current number of amending budgets is excessive and should be reduced as much as possible, in order to comply with the conditions set out in Article 37 of the Financial Regulation in respect of their presentation; considers it desirable for the institutions to agree on some periods of the year on which amending budgets should be presented, except in very urgent circumstances;
10. meni, da mora biti morebitni dogovor o prerazporeditvah namenjen izogibanju sporov med obema vejama proračunskega organa, ki imata enako pravico do izražanja svojega mnenja, izogibanju zapletov običajnega upravljanja zadevnih služb in usklajevanju koledarja za morebitno izogibanje sklica spravnih struktur brez ogrožanja sedanje stopnje posredovanja Parlamenta pri sprejetju prerazporeditev; priporoča, da bi prag za prerazporeditve ostal trajen;
Considers that a possible agreement on transfers shall aim at avoiding conflicts between the two branches of the budgetary authority, which are both entitled to pronounce themselves on an equal footing, avoiding complicating usual management by the relevant services, and harmonising the calendar in order to possibly avoid the convocation of conciliation structures, without putting into question the current level of intervention of Parliament in the adoption of transfers; considers it desirable that the threshold for transfers remains constant;
Začasne dvanajstine
Provisional Twelfths
16. spominja, da je v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo za sprejetje nove uredbe z večletnim finančnim okvirom nujna odobritev Parlamenta in da bodo spremembe finančne uredbe spadale pod redni zakonodajni postopek (soodločanje);
Recalls that, according to the TL, the consent of Parliament is required for the adoption of the new regulation containing the MFF and that the modifications of the Financial Regulation will fall under the ordinary legislative procedure (co-decision);
Odboru za proračun podeljuje mandat, da se na proračunskem spravnem srečanju novembra 2009 pogaja in doseže dogovor o zahtevanih prehodnih smernicah glede zadevnih vprašanj, in sicer z omejitvami in pogoji, ki so navedeni v tej resoluciji;
Confers a mandate on the Committee on Budgets to negotiate and agree at the budgetary conciliation of November 2009 on the required transitional guidelines on the issues mentioned above within the limits and under the conditions set out in this resolution;
Z Lizbonsko pogodbo bodo uvedene pomembne spremembe v številnih vidikih "finančne ustave" EU.
The Treaty of Lisbon will introduce substantial modifications in various aspects of the so called “financial constitution" of the EU.
Najbolj pomembne naj bi bile:
The most relevant of these can be considered to be:
- odprava razlikovanja med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki, kar pomeni, da bosta Parlament in Svet enako odgovorna za vse odhodke EU,
- the suppression of the distinction between compulsory and non compulsory expenses, implying that EP and Council are equally responsible for the whole expenditure of the EU
- priznanje večletnega finančnega okvira kot pravno zavezujočega akta, ki ga mora upoštevati letni proračun, tega pa bo sprejel Svet s soglasjem po odobritvi Parlamenta (z večino svojih poslancev),
- the recognition of the MFF as a legally binding act with which the annual budget must comply, which will be adopted by the Council deciding by unanimity after obtaining the consent of the EP (by the majority of its members)
- pomembna poenostavitev proračunskega postopka, ki bo imel v prihodnosti le eno obravnavo v vsaki instituciji na podlagi predloga Komisije; v primeru, da Evropski parlament in Svet ne bosta uspela doseči popolnega dogovora, bo sklican spravni odbor, ki naj bi dosegel skupno besedilo v 21 dneh; to besedilo bo obravnavano kot sprejeto, razen če bi ga ena od institucij izrecno zavrnila
- the substantial simplification of the budgetary procedure, which will in the future have one reading in each institution, based on proposal from a Commission, after what, if EP and Council do not come to a complete agreement, a conciliation committee will be called with view of reaching a joint text in 21 days; this joint text will be considered adopted unless one of the institutions expressly rejects it
Teoretično naj bi bilo stališče Parlamenta močnejše od stališča Sveta, kajti če Svet zavrne skupno besedilo, medtem ko ga Parlament odobri, ta še vedno lahko uveljavi spremembe, ki jih je predlagal v svoji obravnavi s kvalificirano večino treh petin oddanih glasov ter absolutno večino svojih poslancev. , v tem primeru (in tudi, ko spravni odbor ne bo dosegel skupnega besedila) se bo postopek ponovno začel z novim predlogom Komisije.
In fact the position of the EP is theoretically stronger than that of Council, for if only this institution rejects the joint text while the EP adopts it, EP can still impose the amendments it had proposed on its reading by a qualified majority of three fifths of the votes cast and the absolute majority of its component Members. , in which case (as well as when no joint text is reached by the conciliation committee) the procedure will start fresh with a new proposal of the Commission.
Po začetku veljave Lizbonske pogodbe, ki je predviden za začetek naslednjega leta, bodo nekatera pravila medinstitucionalnega sporazuma ali finančne uredbe zastarela.
As a consequence of the entry into force of the TL - foreseen until the beginning of next year - some rules of the IIA or of the Financial Regulation will become obsolete.
Da bi preprečile kakršno koli morebitno pravno praznino, bodo institucije morale precej hitro
Therefore, in order to avoid any possible legal vacuum, the institutions will need, rather quickly
- sprejeti novo uredbo z večletnim finančnim okvirom (ki bo dejansko nadomestil veljavni medinstitucionalni sporazum); za to bo potrebna soglasna odobritev Sveta po potrditvi Evropskega parlamenta;
- to adopt the new regulation containing the MFF (which will in fact replace the current IIA); this requires unanimous approval by the Council after obtaining the consent of the EP;
- prilagoditi finančno uredbo novim pravilom Lizbonske pogodbe (z uporabo soodločanja);
- to adapt the Financial Regulation to the new rules of the TL (co-decision will apply);
- doseči dogovor o novem in skrajšanem medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, ki bo vseboval nekatera pravila ali načela o sodelovanju med institucijami, ki ne bodo vključena v nova instrumenta.
- to agree on a new and reduced IIA which will contain some needed rules or principles on collaboration between the institutions that will not find its place in those two new instruments.
Vsi novi instrumenti se morajo začeti uporabljati čim prej, da bo proračunski postopek za leto 2011 potekal s popolnoma jasnim pravnim okvirom.
All these new instruments should be in place the soonest possible, in order to allow for the budgetary procedure for 2011 to run in a perfectly clear legal framework.
Vendar pa so lahko postopki, kljub njihovemu tekočemu poteku, sprejeti nekaj mesecev po začetku veljave Lizbonske pogodbe.
But even if the procedures run rather smoothly, it may take some months after the entry into force of the TL before they are adopted.
Institucije pa bodo verjetno morale obravnavati izvrševanje proračuna, sprejemati spremembe proračuna in nadaljevati proračunski postopek za leto 2011 še pred začetkom veljave omenjenih novih instrumentov.
However, the institutions may need to deal with the implementation of the budget, adopt amending budgets and proceed with the budgetary procedure for 2011 even before the new instruments identified above are in place.
Zato se morajo dogovoriti o skupnih smernicah, ki bodo omogočale
For this, they need to agree on some common guidelines that allow them, notably, to
- izvrševanje proračuna, predvsem sprejem prerazporeditev,
- - implement the budget, notably adopting transfers
- sprejetje potrebnih sprememb proračuna,
- - adopt amending budgets if necessary,