natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- v skladu z načelom relativne stabilnosti presoja družbeno-ekonomskih vplivov, ki bi jih povečan ribolovni napor in uporaba nekaterih pripomočkov na plovilih z večjo zmogljivostjo v izključnih ekonomskih conah v bližini najbolj oddaljenih regij imel za trajnostnost zadevnih lokalnih skupnosti;
- evaluating, on the basis of the principle of relative stability, the socio-economic impact of an increased fishing effort and the use of certain tackle by vessels with greater fishing capacity in the EEZs adjoining the outermost regions in terms of the sustainability of the local communities concerned;
- zagotovitev pomoči Skupnosti za prenovo in posodobitev ribiških flot najbolj oddaljenih regij, zlasti flot za mali priobalni ribolov, je nujen pogoj za izboljšanje pogojev konzerviranja rib in pogojev dela pa tudi varnosti zaposlenih v ribištvu v najbolj oddaljenih regijah;
- ensuring Community support for the renewal and modernisation of the ORs' fishing fleets, and especially the traditional fleet, since this is a sine qua non for improving the conditions of conservation of fish and safety standards for fisheries workers in those regions;
- okrepitev pomoči Skupnosti znanstvenim raziskavam na področju ribolova in za zbiranje podatkov, ki mora omogočiti spodbujanje zaščite in obnove ribolovnih virov in biološke raznovrstnosti najbolj oddaljenih regij, zlasti s priznanjem specifičnosti tej regij v programih, povezanih s sedmim okvirnim programom za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti
- reinforcing Community support for scientific fisheries research and the gathering of information, in such a way as to promote the protection and recovery of fish stocks and the biodiversity of the outermost regions, while paying special attention to the specific characteristics of those regions in the context of the programmes under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities;
- izboljšanje ribolovnega orodja in prepoved uporabe ribolovnega orodja, ki uničuje morske ekosisteme;
- improving fishing gear and banning the use of fishing gear that destroys marine ecosystems;
- uvedba družbeno-ekonomskih ukrepov za kompenzacijo vpliva ukrepov ( prostovoljnih ali neprostovoljnih), namenjenih ohranjanju ribolovnih virov;
- introducing socio-economic measures to compensate fishermen for the impact of measures, voluntary or otherwise, to conserve fishery resources;
- oblikovanje programa Skupnosti za pomoč malemu priobalnemu ribolovu, ki upošteva njegove posebnosti in družbeno-ekonomski pomen za te regije;
- creating a Community programme to support small-scale inshore and artisanal fishing, taking account of its specific characteristics and its social and economic importance in the regions concerned;
- pomoč pri izobraževanju in strokovnemu usposabljanju, izboljšanju pogojev dela (vključno s higienskimi razmerami, varnostjo in udobjem) ter gospodarskega položaja ribičev, ki spodbujajo pomladitev sektorja;
- supporting improvements to professional training and qualification, working conditions (including conditions ensuring hygiene, safety and comfort) and the economic situation for fishermen, with a view to renewing the industry's age profile;
- povečanje pomoči, namenjene predelavi, trženju in promociji ribolovnih proizvodov najbolj oddaljenih regij;
- boosting support for the processing, marketing and promotion of fish products from the ORs;
- posodobitev in izgradnja infrastrukture in pristaniške opreme za pomoč ribolovu, ki trenutno ne zadostuje za zadovoljitev potreb ribiškega sektorja v nekaterih najbolj oddaljenih regijah;
- modernising and creating port infrastructure and facilities to support fishing, recalling that these are now insufficient to meet the needs of the fisheries sector in certain outermost regions;
- okrepitev trajnostne razvojne pomoči za ribogojstvo v skladu s posebnostmi posamezne najbolj oddaljene regije;
- boosting support for the sustainable development of aquaculture and aquaculture production, in the context of the specific needs of each of the ORs concerned;
6. pozdravlja oblikovanje ločene skupine za otoke v regionalnem posvetovalnem svetu za jugozahodne vode, ki bo lahko bolj objektivno obravnaval specifično ribištvo najbolj oddaljenih regij.
Welcomes the creation of an island subdivision under the umbrella of the South Western Waters Regional Advisory Council, in the interests of a more objective treatment for the particular fisheries of the outermost regions.
o napredku EU na področjih enakih možnosti in nediskriminacije (prenos Direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES)
on progress made in equal opportunities and non-discrimination in the EU (the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC)
PE 398.471v02-00
PE 398.471v03-00
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 11
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 12
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o nediskriminaciji in enakih možnostih za vse – okvirna strategija ( KOM(2005)0224 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication on non-discrimination and equal opportunities for all - A framework strategy ( COM(2005)0224 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 13 Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 13 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost
– having regard to Council Directive 2000/43/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o uporabi Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost ( KOM(2006)0643 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication on the application of Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin ( COM(2006)0643 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije iz julija 2007 o oblikovanju protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje v Evropi – primerjava 25 držav članic EU,
– having regard to the Commission report on Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe: The 25 EU Member States compared of July 2007,
– ob upoštevanju nacionalnih poročil o izvajanju protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje in tematskih poročil mreže pravnih strokovnjakov za boj proti diskriminaciji, ki jo je ustanovila Komisija, da bi ji pomagala pri njenem delu ter zagotovila neodvisne informacije in nasvete o napredovanju v državah članicah,
– having regard to the national reports on the implementation of anti-discrimination legislation and the thematic reports produced by the network of legal experts in anti-discrimination to support its work set up by the Commission in order to provide independent information and advice on relevant developments in the Member States,
– ob upoštevanju mednarodne konvencije ZN o odpravi vseh oblik rasne diskriminacije,
– having regard to the UN's International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov,
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Peoples with Disabilities,
– ob upoštevanju evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter protokola številka 12 k tej konvenciji,
– having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Protocol No12 thereto,
– ob upoštevanju posebne raziskave Eurobarometra iz januarja 2007 o diskriminaciji v Evropski uniji, ki jo je naročila Komisija,
– having regard to the Commission's Special Eurobarometer Survey on Discrimination in the European Union, of January 2007,
– ob upoštevanju, da je bilo leto 2007 razglašeno za evropsko leto enakih možnosti za vse, leto 2008 pa za evropsko leto medkulturnega dialoga,
– having regard to the designation of 2007 as European Year of Equal Opportunities for All and 2008 as European Year of Intercultural Dialogue,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0159/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0159/2008 ),
A. ker je v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji zapisano, da Evropska unija temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države, na načelih, ki so skupna vsem državam članicam, in ker je pomembno, da političnim izjavam o boju proti diskriminaciji sledi postopen napredek in pravilno izvajanje zakonodaje in politike, zlasti direktiv o prepovedi diskriminacije in projektov, ki spodbujajo enakost,
A. whereas Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union provides that the European Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States and it is important that political declarations on the fight against discrimination are matched by the progressive development and full and correct implementation of legislation and policies, notably as regards the directives prohibiting discrimination and projects promoting equality,
B. ker je v členu 6 Pogodbe o EU tudi zapisano, da Unija spoštuje temeljne pravice, kakršne zagotavlja evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, in ker je v skladu s členom 13 Pogodbe o ES spodbujanje enakosti in nediskriminacije prednostna naloga zakonodaje in politike Evropske unije,
B. whereas Article 6 of the EU Treaty also provides that the Union shall respect fundamental rights as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the promotion of equality and non-discrimination in accordance with Article 13 of the EC Treaty should be a priority of the European Union's laws and policies,
C. ker je zaposlovanje eden osnovnih zahtev za socialno vključevanje, stopnja nezaposlenosti v številnih skupinah, zlasti med ženskami, migranti, invalidi, etničnimi manjšinami, starostniki in mladimi ter tistimi s posameznimi in nepriznanimi spretnostmi, pa ostaja nesprejemljivo visoka; ker je nezaposlenost med osebami, ki so izpostavljene večvrstni diskriminaciji, še višja,
C. whereas employment is one of the basic requirements for social inclusion but levels of unemployment among many groups, in particular women, migrants, people with disabilities, ethnic minorities, older and younger people and those with isolated or unrecognised skills, remain unacceptably high; whereas unemployment among persons suffering from multiple discrimination is even higher,
D. ker pravo Skupnosti trenutno ne pokriva diskriminacije v večini področij pristojnosti Skupnosti in ker obstajajo različne stopnje zaščite v Direktivi 2000/78/ES in Direktivi 2000/43/ES, ki povzročajo vrzeli pri zaščiti pred diskriminacijo, ki vpliva na zaposlovanje,
D. whereas Community law does not currently cover discrimination in most areas of Community competence and whereas Directive 2000/78/EC and Directive 2000/43/EC provide different levels of protection, which create gaps in protection against discrimination that impacts on employment,
E. ker pregled Komisije o razvoju protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje v Evropi potrjuje, da na ravni držav članic obstaja "kolaž" zakonodajnih aktov, ki ščitijo pred diskriminacijo na različne načine, pogosto pa ni skupne metode izvajanja, zaradi česar izvajanje direktiv ni usklajeno in se ljudje ne zavedajo dovolj svojih pravic,
E. whereas the Commission's mapping survey on Developing Anti-Discrimination law in Europe confirms that at Member State level there is a patchwork of legislation across Member States, protecting against discrimination in different ways and often lacking a common method of implementation, which has led to a lack of harmony in the implementation of directives and a situation in which people are not sufficiently aware of their rights,
F. ker neskladnost izvajanja politike nediskriminacije v državah članicah prispeva k pomanjkljivemu izvajanju direktiv Skupnosti o prepovedi diskriminacije, kar je razvidno iz poročil, kot je poročilo evropske skupine strokovnjakov za boj proti diskriminaciji na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti pri zaposlovanju: zakonodaja v petnajstih državah članicah EU,
F. whereas the inconsistent application of non-discrimination policies in Member States contributes to the lack of implementation in practice of Community directives prohibiting against discrimination, as is reflected in reports such as that of the European Group of Experts on Combating Sexual Orientation Discrimination on Combating sexual orientation discrimination in employment: legislation in fifteen EU member states,
G. ker je Svet v svoji resoluciji z dne 26. novembra 2007 o nadaljnjem spremljanju evropskega leta enakih možnosti za vse (2007)
G. whereas in its resolution on the Follow-up of the European Year of Equal Opportunities fo All (2007) of 26 November 2007
15383/07. pozval države članice in Komisijo, naj v skladu s svojimi pristojnostmi ohranijo in okrepijo uvajanje vprašanj invalidnosti v vse ustrezne politike,
15383/07. , the Council invited Member States and the Commission, in accordance with their respective competences, to sustain and reinforce the mainstreaming of issues relating to disability into all relevant policies,
H. ker je Komisija zato upravičeno pričela postopke proti številnim državam članicam in mora tako še naprej ravnati, kadar je potrebno,
H. whereas the Commission has therefore justly commenced procedures against several Member States, and needs to continue doing so when necessary,
7. poudarja, da imajo javni organi bistveno vlogo pri spodbujanju enakosti in preprečevanju diskriminacije, prek svojih politik, zagotavljanja storitev in prakse zaposlovanja;
Emphasises that public authorities have a key role to play in promoting equality and preventing discrimination, through their policies, their provision of services and their employment practices;
9. poziva k učinkovitemu, sorazmernemu in odvračalnemu kaznovanju kršenja nacionalnih določb, sprejetih ob prenosu direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES;
Urges that sanctions applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive;
12. meni, da zaradi odsotnosti določbe o potrebni široki opredelitvi invalidnosti v Direktivi 2000/78/ES nekatere kategorije invalidov v tej direktivi nimajo pravnega varstva; zato poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj se nemudoma dogovorijo o tej široki opredelitvi invalidnosti, da bi omogočile uskladitev s protidiskriminacijsko zakonodajo, ki bi lahko temeljila na Konvenciji o pravicah invalidov;
Believes that the absence of a provision in Directive 2000/78/EC indicating the necessity for broad definitions of disability has excluded some categories of disabled people from the legal protection of the Directive; therefore invites Member States and the Commission to agree such broad definitions of disability urgently, in order to facilitate the harmonisation of anti-discrimination legislation, which could be based on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;
13. meni, da so zaradi neopredeljenega roka za vložitev tožbe zaradi diskriminacije v nekaterih državah roki zelo kratki, kar lahko žrtve ovira pri vložitvi tožbe;
13. believes, that the undefined time limit for filing action against discrimination has lead in some Member States to very short time limits, which might hinder victims in filing action;
16. je zaskrbljen zaradi nizke stopnje osveščenosti glede protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje med državljani v državah članicah in poziva Komisijo, države članice, sindikate in delodajalce, naj okrepijo prizadevanja za njeno povečanje; opozarja, da direktive državam članicam nalagajo obvezo širjenja informacij v javnosti o ustreznih določbah teh direktiv z vsemi ustreznimi sredstvi;
Is concerned about the low level of awareness of anti-discrimination legislation among citizens in the Member States and calls on the Commission, the Member States, trade unions and employers to step up their efforts to raise that level of awareness; recalls that the Directives impose an obligation on Member States to disseminate information to the public on the relevant provisions of the Directives by all appropriate means;
23. priporoča, naj države članice za zagotavljanje učinkovitejše stopnje zaščite pooblastijo združenja, organizacije in druge pravne subjekte za sodelovanje v sodnih postopkih, tudi v imenu katere koli žrtve ali v njeno podporo;
Recommends that, in order to provide a more effective level of protection, Member States should empower associations, organisations and other legal entities to engage in legal proceedings, including on behalf or in support of any victim;
25. predlaga, naj države članice zagotovijo, da lahko združenja, organizacije in drugi pravni subjekti v imenu enega ali več pritožnikov sodelujejo v vseh sodnih postopkih za izvajanje direktiv;
Recommends that Member States ensure that associations, organisations and other legal entities may engage on behalf of one or more complainants in any judicial proceedings for the enforcement of the Directives;
29. pozdravlja zanimanje Komisije za problematiko večvrstne diskriminacije in začetek njene študije na to temo; poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme uravnoteženo širšo opredelitev večvrstne diskriminacije ter preuči in priskrbi podatke o njej in o zločinih iz sovraštva; poziva jo tudi, naj vključi določbe, oblikovane posebej za boj proti večvrstni diskriminaciji, do katere lahko pride iz enega ali kombinacije več razlogov, v celotno prihodnjo zakonodajo, sprejeto v skladu s členom 13 Pogodbe o ES;
Welcomes the Commission's interest in multiple discrimination, including its launch of a study on this subject; calls on the Commission to adopt a balanced broad concept of multiple discrimination and for the Commission to examine and supply data on multiple discrimination and hate crimes, calls on the Commission to include provisions explicitly designed to combat multiple discrimination in any future legislation adopted under Article 13 of the EC Treaty, which can be invoked on either one or a combination of more than one of the grounds;
33. poudarja, da mora Komisija oblikovati skupno stališče EU glede pomena pozitivnih ukrepov ali si mora vsaj prizadevati za soglasje o njih; tako bi prekinila mite o njihovem pomenu in izvajanju v nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti glede njihove učinkovitosti v boju proti diskriminaciji in vzpostavljanju enakosti rezultatov v nekaterih državah članicah;
Stresses that the Commission must produce a common, EU-wide definition of, or at least work towards a consensus about, the meaning of positive action, thereby dispelling the myths surrounding its meaning and its application in some Member States, particularly given its effectiveness for successfully tackling discrimination and producing equality of outcomes in some Member States;
40. , da bo skladna z zaščito drugih skupin pred diskriminacijo;
40. so that it is consistent with the protection of discrimination against the other groups;
39. meni, da lahko različna obravnava na podlagi državljanstva ali jezika, ki ni objektivno in razumno utemeljena z zakonitim ciljem niti dosežena z ustreznimi in potrebnimi sredstvi, predstavlja posredno diskriminacijo na podlagi rase ali narodnosti, ki je v nasprotju z Direktivo 2000/43/ES;
Takes the view that differences in treatment based on nationality or language, which are neither objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim nor achieved by appropriate and necessary means, may constitute indirect discrimination on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin contrary to Directive 2000/43/EC;
41. meni, da manjšinske skupnosti, zlasti romska skupnost, potrebujejo posebno socialno zaščito, saj so se njihove težave v zvezi z izkoriščanjem, diskriminacijo in izključevanjem s širitvijo na področju izobraževanja, zdravja, nastanitve, zaposlovanja in pravic žensk še zaostrile;
Considers that minority communities, and in particular the Roma community, need specific social protection, since their problems of exploitation, discrimination and exclusion have become even more acute in the areas of education, health, housing, employment and women's rights further to enlargement;
43. poudarja, da je zakonodaja učinkovita le, če se državljani zavedajo svojih pravic in imajo lahek dostop do sodišč; zato meni, da je treba v novem predlogu direktive za boj proti diskriminaciji v smislu člena 13 Pogodbe o ES obravnavati tudi pravna sredstva in izvrševanje, ter priporoča, da države članice ustanovijo enega ali več neodvisnih in učinkovitih organov za spodbujanje enakopravnega obravnavanja in boj proti različnim oblikam diskriminacije s pooblastili za obravnavanje vseh razlogov za diskriminacijo v skladu s členom 13 in delovanje na vseh področjih, ki jih zajema Direktiva 76/207/EGS; meni, da bi morala pristojnost teh organov vključevati zagotavljanje neodvisne pomoči žrtvam diskriminacije pri vlaganju pritožb glede diskriminacije, opravljanje neodvisnih raziskav o izvajanju protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje in oblikovanje predlogov glede vprašanj, povezanih s tovrstno diskriminacijo;
Emphasises, that legislation is effective only when citizens are aware of their rights and have easy access to the courts; therefore believes that the new proposal for a directive to combat discrimination within the meaning of Article 13 of the EC Treaty must also address remedies and enforcement and recommends the establishment by Member States of one or more independent and effective bodies for the promotion of equal treatment and for combating the various forms of discrimination, with a remit to cover all grounds of discrimination under Article 13, and all areas covered by Directive 76/207/EEC; believes that the competence of those bodies should include providing independent assistance to the victims of discrimination in order to enable them to pursue their complaints about discrimination, conducting independent surveys about the application of non-discrimination legislation and making recommendations on any issue relating to such discrimination;
46. z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je Protokol št. 12 k evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin podpisalo 19 držav članic, ratificiralo pa ga je le pet;
Notes with concern that while 19 Member States have signed Protocol No12 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, only 5 have ratified that Protocol;
48. poudarja pomen horizontalnega izvajanja in vključevanja načela nediskriminacije iz lizbonske pogodbe, ko ta prične veljati, kar Evropsko unijo zavezuje, da se pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju svojih politik in dejavnosti usmeri k boju proti diskriminaciji na podlagi spola, rase ali narodnosti, vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti;
Stresses the importance of horizontal implementation and mainstreaming of the non-discrimination clause of the Treaty of Lisbon after it comes into force, which commits the European Union to aim to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation in defining and implementing its policies and activities;
o napredku EU na področjih enakih možnosti in nediskriminacije (prenos direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES)
on the progress made in equal opportunities and non-discrimination in the EU (the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC)
1. poziva države članice, naj v svoji zakonodajni praksi ustrezno upoštevajo različne razloge za diskriminacijo iz člena 21 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije;
Calls on the Member States to take due account in their legislative practice of the various grounds for discrimination set out in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;