natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Standardi so kmetom v pomoč pri proizvajanju kakovostnih proizvodov, ki izpolnjujejo pričakovanja potrošnikov in preprečujejo njihovo razočaranje, ter omogočajo primerjavo cen med proizvodi različnih stopenj kakovosti.
The objectives should be to assist farmers in delivering quality products that meet consumers' expectations, to avoid consumer disappointment, and to facilitate price comparison over a range of product quality.
Predlaga tudi načine poenostavitve oblikovanja standardov s skrajšanjem postopkov Komisije, prenosom njenih obveznosti na tem področju na druge organe ali upoštevanjem mednarodnih standardov.
In addition, she proposes means of simplifying the process of establishing standards: shorter procedures in the Commission, transfer of responsibilities to other bodies, and reference to international standards.
Pri tej poenostavitvi je treba upoštevati tudi upravno breme za javne organe ali druge zadevne akterje.
She believes that any simplification must take account of the administrative tasks proper to the public authorities and the interested parties.
Poleg tega so tržni standardi zaradi razvoja potreb trga in tehnologij lahko delno zastareli ter jih je zato treba posodobiti.
Given changing market trends and technological advances, marketing standards may become partially obsolete and may have to be updated.
Poročevalka je naklonjena tudi obvezni uvedbi navedbe kraja porekla primarnih proizvodov v obliki navedb „proizvedeno v Evropski uniji“ ali „proizvedeno zunaj Evropske unije“.
Secondly, your rapporteur believes it should be made mandatory to indicate the place of origin of primary products, on the basis of the labels 'made in the EU' or 'non-EU'.
Ta sistem bi bilo treba razširiti na predelane živilske proizvode tako, da bi se upoštevalo poreklo glavnih sestavin in surovin ter da bi se povezala njihov kraj porekla in kraj, kjer je bil proizvod nazadnje predelan.
This system should be extended to processed food products, which should indicate the origins of the main ingredients and raw materials used, thus linking place of origin and place of final processing.
Evropski potrošniki ne dobijo dovolj informacij v zvezi s prehranjevalno verigo, zlasti kar zadeva poreklo proizvodov in surovin, pa tudi kraj predelave končnih proizvodov.
Consumers in the EU are not given enough information on the food chain, and this applies in particular to the origins of products and raw materials and to the place of processing of the final product.
Zato je treba ukrep glede navedbe kraja porekla izvajati skupaj z obveščevalno kampanjo za državljane, ki naj jo podpre Evropska unija.
The measures on indication of origin must therefore be accompanied by public information campaigns with EU backing.
Tudi druge pomembne trgovinske partnerice Evropske unije, kot so Združene države ali Nova Zelandija, uporabljajo podobne sisteme označevanja.
In addition, your rapporteur considers that the optional reserved terms should be promoted as an alternative to compulsory marketing standards.
Poročevalka še meni, da je treba bolj spodbujati neobvezne rezervirane navedbe kot pa obvezne tržne standarde ter da ni nujno, da Evropska unija oblikuje svojo opredelitev teh navedb, če so te del zakonodajnih sistemov držav članic in se načelo države porekla lahko uporablja za vzajemno priznavanje teh standardov, ne da bi prišlo do izkrivljanja skupnega trga.
She does not find it necessary for the Union to create its own definition of 'optional reserved terms', given that the Member States' own legislation codifies those aspects and that the country of origin principle can be applied for the mutual recognition of the standards concerned without distorting the common market.
Poročevalka tudi meni, da je treba spodbujati koregulacijo v okviru običajnega postopka za sprejetje evropske zakonodaje o tej zadevi.
She further considers that joint regulation should be promoted as the standard means of adopting EU legislation in the field.
Poročevalka opozarja na predhodne resolucije Parlamenta in želi, da bi se na podlagi že obstoječih modelov izvedla podrobna analiza možnosti uvedbe označevanja kakovostnih evropskih proizvodov .
In line with Parliament's previous resolutions on the subject, your rapporteur favours detailed consideration of the option of a European quality product label , on the basis of the existing models.
Zato poziva Komisijo, naj oceni in predlaga uporabo evropske oznake kakovosti, ki bi dopolnjevala obstoječe nacionalne in regionalne oznake.
The Commission is accordingly called on to examine and propose the launching of a European quality mark to complement the existing national and regional marks.
Potrebno je poudariti, da bi morala ta oznaka zagotavljati predvsem pravično obravnavo vseh akterjev na trgu, ki so vključeni v proizvodnjo in distribucijo proizvodov, in varovanje okolja.
It is also important to stress that such a label should also guarantee fair treatment for all market players at all stages of the production and distribution chain, in an environment-friendly context.
Po mnenju poročevalke bi se evropska oznaka kakovosti lahko oblikovala na osnovi nacionalnih oznak in bi dopolnjevala že uporabljane instrumente v državah članicah, da bi se izognili nezdružljivosti ravni Skupnosti in nacionalne ravni.
With regard to the national quality marks already existing in Europe, your rapporteur believes that there should be the possibility of applying for the European mark as well: it would supplement the instruments already known in the Member States in such a way that no incompatibilities arose.
Poročevalka meni, da bi bilo treba mednarodno razsežnost zaščite geografskih označb obravnavati v okviru mednarodnih trgovinskih pogajanj, in Komisijo poziva, naj to točko uvrsti na dnevni red razprav v okviru STO, da bi to razsežnost priznali vsi mednarodni partnerji.
With regard to the international dimension of the protection of geographical indicators, your rapporteur believes that this should be examined in the context of the international trade negotiations, and calls on the Commission to ensure that the subject is included on the agenda of the WTO talks and is recognised as such by all international partners.
Poročevalka predlaga, naj se za izvajanje sistemov ZGO (zaščitene geografske označbe), ZOP (zaščitene označbe porekla) in ZTP (zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti) v državah članicah zagotovi tehnična pomoč Skupnosti, pa tudi za vrednotenje proizvodov, ki jo prejmejo.
With regard to PGIs (protected geographical indications), PDOs (protected designations of origin) and GTSs (guaranteed traditional specialities), your rapporteur proposes Community technical assistance for the implementation of the above systems in the Member States and the related evaluation of the products concerned, and considers that the European quality systems need to obtain wider recognition in European consumer circles.
Evropski potrošniki morajo precej bolje prepoznavati evropske sisteme priznavanja kakovosti, zato je treba z evropsko finančno pomočjo okrepiti dejavnosti obveščanja in popularizacije v zvezi s temi sistemi na enotnem trgu, pa tudi v tretjih državah.
She therefore advocates further action to disseminate information on these systems and popularise them, with Community financial support, both within the single European market and in third countries.
V ta namen je treba podpreti pobudo za vzpostavitev evropske službe za kakovost proizvodov, ki bi tesno sodelovala z Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane in s službami Komisije, pristojnimi za zaščito kakovosti živil.
It is also important to support the proposal for a European Office for Product Quality, which would work closely with the European Food Safety Authority and the Commission's units responsible for food quality.
Na področju ekološke pridelave poročevalka pozdravlja vzpostavitev služb za tradicionalne in ekološke proizvode ter spodbuja vzpostavitev tovrstnih javnih ali zasebnih organov.
On the subject of organic farming, your rapporteur welcomes the creation at Member State level of offices for traditional and organic products, and encourages the spread of such bodies, whether public or private.
Poročevalka v splošnem meni, da je treba v državah članicah spodbujati sisteme za zagotavljanje kakovosti , ki jih evropski potrošniki večinoma že poznajo, in da jih ni zaželeno poenotiti ali združiti v enega samega.
Your rapporteur believes that, in general, those quality systems in the Member States which already enjoy widespread recognition among European consumers should continue, and that there is no need to standardise the systems or to merge all quality systems into a single structure.
Za zagotovitev minimalnih standardov Skupnosti za potrjevanje kakovosti je treba te standarde tudi ocenjevati in priznati na ravni Skupnosti.
To ensure that there are minimum common European standards for quality certification, there needs to be evaluation at European level and acceptance of the standards.
Pri Komisiji je treba zato vzpostaviti službo, pristojno za potrjevanje in odobritev uporabe tovrstnih sistemov na ravni Skupnosti ter za zagotavljanje enotnega in učinkovitega nadzora na ravni Skupnosti in na nacionalni ravni.
At Commission level, there needs to be an authority responsible for certifying and authorising the use of such systems on a European scale and ensuring that there are uniform and effective controls at both national and Community level.
o zagotavljanju kakovosti hrane - uskladitev ali vzajemno priznavanje standardov
on ensuring food quality - Harmonisation or mutual recognition of standards
1. poudarja, da morajo sistemi kakovosti hrane potrošnikom ponujati informacije in jamstvo o pristnosti lokalnih sestavin in proizvodnih postopkov; zato meni, da je treba takšne sisteme izvajati in upravljati z okrepljenim nadzorom in sistemi sledljivosti;
1. underlines that food quality systems should provide information and offer a guarantee for consumers of the authenticity of local ingredients and production techniques; considers therefore that such schemes need to be implemented and operated with reinforced controls and traceability systems;
2. meni, da je označevanje glavne(ih) sestavin(e) živil s krajem porekla zaželeno, če glavna sestavina ne prihaja z območja „zaščitenih geografskih označb“ ali „zaščitenih označb porekla“, ter da je glavno sestavino treba razumeti kot sestavino, ki predstavlja več kot 50 % živila; poleg tega poudarja, da je treba takšne sisteme označevanja uporabljati prostovoljno;
2. considers that labelling the main ingredient(s) of food products with the place of origin is desirable if the main ingredient does not come from a "Protected Geographical Indication" (PGI) or "Protected Designation of Origin" (PDO) area; considers that the main ingredient should be interpreted as the ingredient that constitutes more than 50 % of the food product; stresses furthermore that such labelling schemes should be used on a voluntary basis;
3. poziva k dodatni poenostavitvi tržnih standardov z razjasnitvijo osnovnih meril, ki jih je treba uporabljati; poziva k oblikovanju smernic EU o uporabi splošnih rezerviranih pojmov, kot so „z manj sladkorja“, „nizkoogljičen“, „dietičen“ ali „naraven“, za preprečevanje zavajajočih praks;
3. calls for further simplification of marketing standards by clarifying the main criteria to be applied; calls for the development of EU guidelines on the use of general reserved terms, such as “low in sugar”, "low carbon", “dietary” and "natural", in order to avoid misleading practices;
4. poudarja potrebo po spodbujanju ekoloških proizvodov in kmetijstva kot vira visokokakovostne hrane ter katalizatorja za zaščito okolja in dobrega počutja živali; poziva k poenostavitvi sistema certificiranja za nadaljnji razvoj trga ekoloških proizvodov ter k takojšnji uvedbi obveznega logotipa EU kot sredstva za nadaljnje povečanje osveščenosti potrošnikov in njihovega prepoznavanja ekoloških proizvodov;
4. stresses the need to promote organic products and farming as a source of high-quality food and a catalyst for environmental and animal welfare protection; calls for a simplification of the certification system so as to further develop the market for organic products and the introduction, without further delay, of a compulsory EU logo as a means to further increase consumer knowledge and recognition of organic products;
5. priznava, da imajo potrošniki vedno večje zahteve glede kakovosti hrane in živil, ne zgolj v smislu varnosti, temveč tudi v smislu etičnih vprašanj, kot so okoljska trajnost, zaščita dobrega počutja živali in tehnologije gensko spremenjenih organizmov (GSO); poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi merila za pobude za kakovost, kot so prostovoljni sistemi označevanja proizvodov brez GSO, ki bodo potrošnikom zagotovili jasno izbiro.
5. recognises that consumers have ever growing demands concerning the quality of food and food products, not only in terms of safety, but also in terms of ethical concerns, such as environmental sustainability, animal welfare protection and genetically modified organisms (GMO) technologies; calls on the Commission to provide criteria for quality initiatives such as voluntary GMO-free labelling schemes which will provide consumers with a clear choice.
o zdravstvenih vprašanjih v zvezi z elektromagnetnimi sevanji
on health concerns associated with electromagnetic fields
– ob upoštevanju členov 137, 152 in 174 Pogodbe ES, katerih cilj je zagotavljanje visoke ravni zdravja ljudi, varovanja okolja ter varnosti in zdravja pri delu,
– having regard to Articles 137, 152, and 174 of the EC Treaty, seeking to promote a high level of human health, environmental protection and workers' health and safety protection,
– ob upoštevanju Priporočila Sveta 1999/519/ES z dne 12. julija 1999 o omejevanju izpostavljenosti splošne javnosti elektromagnetnim poljem
– having regard to Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields
UL L 199, 30.7.1999, str.
OJ L 199, 30.7.1999, p.
59. in poročil Komisije o izvajanju tega priporočila z dne 1. septembra 2008 (KOM(2008)532 konč.),
59. and the related Commission implementation report of 1 September 2008 ( COM(2008)0532 ),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/40/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtevah v zvezi z izpostavljenostjo delavcev tveganjem, ki nastajajo zaradi fizikalnih dejavnikov (elektromagnetnih sevanj)
– having regard to Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields)
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 1999/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 1999 o radijski opremi in telekomunikacijski terminalski opremi ter medsebojnem priznavanju skladnosti te opreme
– having regard to Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity
10. ter ob upoštevanju posameznih usklajenih varnostnih standardov za mobilne telefone in bazne postaje,
10. and to the respective harmonised safety standards for mobile phones and base stations,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o uskladitvi zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z električno opremo, konstruirano za uporabo znotraj določenih napetostnih mej
– having regard to Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2008 o vmesnem pregledu Evropskega akcijskega načrta za okolje in zdravje 2004–2010
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2008 on the mid-term review of the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0410 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0410 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 1999 o predlogu priporočila Sveta o omejevanju izpostavljenosti javnosti elektromagnetnim poljem (0 Hz do 300 GHz)
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 1999 on the proposal for a Council Recommendation on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields 0 Hz – 300 GHz
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0089/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0089/2009 ),
A. ker so elektromagnetna polja tudi v naravi ter so bila torej na Zemlji vedno prisotna; ker pa je v zadnjih desetletjih izpostavljenost okolja elektromagnetnim poljem, ki jih povzroča človek, stalno naraščala zaradi povpraševanja po električni energiji, vse naprednejših brezžičnih tehnologij in sprememb v družbeni organiziranosti; ker je sedaj vsak državljan doma in na delovnem mestu izpostavljen raznovrstnim električnim in magnetnim poljem različnih frekvenc,
A. whereas electromagnetic fields (EMFs) exist in nature and have consequently always been present on earth; whereas, however, in recent decades, environmental exposure to man-made sources of EMFs has risen constantly, driven by demand for electricity, increasingly more specialised wireless technologies, and changes in the organisation of society; whereas the end effect is that every individual is now being exposed to a complex mixture of electric and magnetic fields of different frequencies, both at home and at work,
B. ker brezžična tehnologija (mobilni telefon, WiFi, WiMAX, Bluetooth, telefon z bazno postajo DECT) ustvarja elektromagnetna polja, ki lahko škodljivo vplivajo na zdravje ljudi,
B. whereas wireless technology (mobile phones, Wi-Fi/WiMAX, Bluetooth, DECT landline telephones) emits EMFs that may have adverse effects on human health,
C. ker večina evropskih državljanov, zlasti mladih v starosti med 10 in 20 let, uporablja mobilni telefon, ki je uporaben predmet in modni dodatek, in ker ostaja negotovost glede morebitnih tveganj za zdravje, zlasti za mlade, katerih možgani se še razvijajo,
C. whereas most European citizens, especially young people aged from 10 to 20, use a mobile phone, an object serving a practical purpose and as a fashion accessory, and whereas there are continuing uncertainties about the possible health risks, particularly to young people whose brains are still developing,
D. ker se je polemika v znanstveni skupnosti o morebitnih tveganjih za zdravje zaradi elektromagnetnih polj od 12. julija 1999 okrepila, ko si bile s priporočilom 1999/519/ES določene mejne vrednosti izpostavljenosti javnosti elektromagnetnim poljem (0 Hz do 300 GHz),
D. whereas the dispute within the scientific community regarding the potential health risks arising from EMFs has intensified since 12 July 1999, when exposure limits for fields in the 0 Hz to 300 GHz range were laid down in Recommendation 1999/519/EC,
E. ker so, čeprav znanstvena skupnost ni dosegla natančnih sklepov, nekatere nacionalne ali regionalne vlade v najmanj 9 državah članicah Evropske unije, pa tudi na Kitajskem, v Švici in Rusiji, določile tako imenovane preventivne mejne vrednosti izpostavljenosti, torej nižje od vrednosti, ki jih zagovarjata Komisija in njen neodvisni znanstveni odbor, Znanstveni odbor za nastajajoča in na novo ugotovljena zdravstvena tveganja,
E. whereas the fact that the scientific community has reached no definite conclusions has not prevented some national or regional governments, in China, Switzerland, and Russia, as well as in at least nine EU Member States, from setting what are termed ‘preventive’ exposure limits, that is to say, lower than those advocated by the Commission and its independent scientific committee, the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR)
H. ker kljub temu kaže, da so nekatera dognanja enotna, zlasti da posamezniki različno reagirajo na izpostavljenost mikrovalovom, opozorilo, da je treba prednostno izvesti preskuse izpostavljenosti v dejanskih pogojih, da bi ocenili netermične učinke, povezane z radiofrekvenčnimi polji, ter posebna občutljivost otrok pri izpostavljenosti elektromagnetnim poljem
H. whereas, however, there are some points that appear to be the subject of general agreement, in particular the idea that reactions to microwave exposure vary from one person to another, the need, as a matter of priority, to conduct exposure tests under actual conditions in order to assess the non-thermal effects associated with radio-frequency (RF) fields, and the fact that children exposed to EMFs are especially vulnerable
Študija STOA iz marca 2001 o fizioloških in okoljskih učinkih neionizirajočih elektromagnetnih sevanj, PE št. 297.574. ,
March 2001 STOA study on ‘The physiological and environmental effects of non-ionising EMR’, PE297.574. ,
I. ker je Evropska unija določila mejne vrednosti izpostavljenosti za zaščito delavcev pred učinki elektromagnetnih polj; ker bi bilo treba na podlagi previdnostnega načela take ukrepe sprejeti tudi za skupine prizadetega prebivalstva, kot so okoliški prebivalci in potrošniki,
I. whereas the EU has laid down exposure limits to protect workers from the effects of EMFs; whereas on the basis of the precautionary principle such measures should also be taken for the sections of population concerned, such as residents and consumers,
J. ker posebno poročilo Eurobarometra o elektromagnetnih poljih (št. 272a, junij 2007) kaže, da večina državljanov meni, da jih javni organi ne obveščajo ustrezno o ukrepih za zaščito pred elektromagnetnimi polji,
J. whereas the Special Eurobarometer report on Electromagnetic Fields (No 272a of June 2007) indicates that the majority of citizens do not feel that the public authorities inform them adequately on measures to protect them from EMFs,
K. ker je nujno nadaljevati raziskave vmesnih in zelo nizkih frekvenc, da bi lahko prišli do zaključkov glede njihovega vpliva na zdravje,
K. whereas it is necessary to continue investigations into intermediate and very low frequencies so that conclusions can be drawn as to their effects on health,
L. ker Direktiva 2004/40/ES ne sme ogroziti slikanja z uporabo magnetne resonance, saj je to vrhunska tehnologija za raziskave, diagnostiko in zdravljenje bolezni, ki ogrožajo življenja evropskih pacientov,
L. whereas the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) must not be threatened by Directive 2004/40/EC as MRI technology is at the cutting edge of research, diagnosis and treatment of life-threatening diseases for patients in Europe,
M. ker varnostni standard za magnetno resonanco IEC/EN 60601-2-33 določa mejne vrednosti za elektromagnetna polja tako, da izključuje vsakršno nevarnost za paciente in delavce,
M. whereas the MRI safety standard IEC/EN 60601-2-33 establishes limit values for EMFs which have been set so that any danger to patients and workers is excluded.
2. poziva, naj se ob ocenjevanju možnih vplivov elektromagnetnega sevanja na zdravje posebej preučijo biološki učinki, zlasti ker so nekatere študije odkrile, da so najškodljivejši učinki na najnižjih stopnjah; poziva k dejavnim raziskavam, ki bodo za potencialne zdravstvene težave razvile rešitve za izničenje ali zmanjšanje pulziranja in amplitudne modulacije frekvenc, ki se uporabljajo za prenos;
Calls for particular consideration of biological effects when assessing the potential health impact of electromagnetic radiation, especially given that some studies have found the most harmful effects at lowest levels; calls for active research to address potential health problems by developing solutions that negate or reduce the pulsating and amplitude modulation of the frequencies used for transmission;