natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kandidati morajo imeti lastnosti in sposobnosti, potrebne za učinkovito izvajanje nalog izvršnega direktorja agencije, zlasti glede finančnih pravil, ki se uporabljajo za agencijo.
The candidates shall have the qualities and skills required to effectively perform the duties of Executive Director of the Agency, particularly with regard to the financial rules applicable to the Agency.
Usklajeno s členom 14(3).
Consistency with Article 14(3).
Vsaka država članica, vsaka država, ki se je pridružila izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda in ukrepov, povezanih z EURODAC, ter Komisija v vsako svetovalno skupino imenujejo enega člana za triletno obdobje, ki se lahko podaljša.
Each Member State , each country associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis and the EURODAC related measures as well as the Commission shall appoint one member to each of the Advisory Groups for a three-year term, which may be renewed.
Vsaka svetovalna skupina ima deset članov.
Each Advisory Group shall have 10 members.
Komisija imenuje enega člana, Svet pa ostalih devet članov za posamezno skupino.
Nine members of each Advisory Group shall be appointed by the Council.
Člani se imenujejo za triletno obdobje, ki se lahko podaljša.
All members shall be appointed for a three-year term, which may be renewed.
Svetovalni organi bi morali po možnosti doseči soglasje glede stališč, vendar preveliko število članov tega ne spodbuja.
Given that advisory bodies should make every effort to achieve consensus in their opinions, overly large bodies are not conducive to reaching an opinion.
Preveliki svetovalni organi bi lahko po nepotrebnem otežili delo agencije.
Overly large advisory bodies may therefore make the Agency's work unnecessarily more difficult.
Poglavje IV – Naslov
Chapter IV – Title
Nov naslov za določbe o osebju.
A new title on staff provision.
Zaposlovanje začasnega osebja za opravljanje občutljivih finančnih nalog bi lahko vplivalo na uspešnost agencije zaradi nekvalificiranega/neusposobljenega/nemotiviranega osebja.
Recruiting interim staffs to perform sensitive financial duties could affect the agency's performance due to unqualified/ not trained staff/not motivated staff.
Zaradi tega utegne biti agencija izpostavljena finančnim goljufijam, saj je na začasno osebje, ki želi pridobiti podaljšanje pogodbe, lažje vplivati.
This could also expose the agency to financial fraud as the interim staff is more exposed to be influenced in order to get a renewal of his/her contract.
Glej tudi resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o razrešnici za leto 2008: uspešnost, finančno poslovodenje in nadzor agencij EU (odstavek 7) (sprejeta besedila, 5. maj 2010, P7_TA(2010)0139 ).
See also the EP Resolution on "The 2008 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies" paragraph 7(Texts adopted of 5 May 2010, P7_TA(2010)0139 ).
Če Komisija ugotovi, da je prišlo do večkratnih kršitev kadrovskih predpisov ali pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev in da upravni odbor agencije na tem področju ne izpolnjuje dodeljene nadzorne funkcije, lahko zahteva, da v okviru svoje nadzorne funkcije na področju upravljanja s kadri ukrepa namesto agencije.
If the Commission establishes that there have been repeated infringements of the Staff Regulations or the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants and that the Agency's Management Board is not fulfilling the monitoring role assigned to it in this area, the Commission may demand, in the context of its supervisory role, to take action itself in the area of staff management in place of the Agency.
V preteklosti se je pri drugih agencijah izkazalo, da upravni odbori niso imeli ustreznega nadzora nad pristojnostmi izvršnega direktorja na področju upravljanja s kadri.
In the past, in the case of other agencies, the powers of the Executive Director have proved not to be subject to adequate monitoring by the Management Board in the area of personnel management.
Tudi v primerih večkratnih očitnih kršitev kadrovskih predpisov so upravni odbori v drugih agencijah le z odporom izpolnjevali svojo nadzorno funkcijo.
Even when there have clearly been repeated infringements of the Staff Regulations, management boards in other agencies have been reluctant to fulfil their monitoring role.
Namen predloga spremembe je, da se Komisiji zagotovi skrajno sredstvo v okviru njene vloge nadzornika.
This amendment is intended to give the Commission a last resort option within the context of its supervisory role.
Člen 20 iz predloga Komisije postane člen 17 a (novo).
Article 20 of the Commission proposal is now moved to Article 17 a (new).
Poglavje IV a (novo) – pred členom 18
Chapter IV a (new)– before Article 18
POGLAVJE IVa
CHAPTER IVa
Novo poglavje.
New Chapter.
V ta namen vsako leto dajo pisno izjavo o zavezanosti.
For this purpose, they shall make, annually and in writing, a statement of commitment.
Člen 19 – naslov
Article 19 – Title
Sporazum o sedežu
Headquarters Agreement
Sporazum o sedežu in pogoji delovanja
Headquarters Agreement and Operating Conditions
Sprememba naslova.
Change in the Title.
Zaradi predloga spremembe 11 postane odveč.
Redundancy due to amendment 11.
Upravni nadzor
Administrative controls
Dejavnosti agencije nadzoruje evropski varuh človekovih pravic v skladu s členom 228 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The activities of the Agency shall be subject to the scrutiny of the European Ombudsman in accordance with Article 228 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union .
Člen 27 – naslov
Article 27 – Title
Upoštevati bi bilo treba tudi možnost pregledov.
Possibilities of review should also need to be taken into account.
V treh letih po začetku izvajanja nalog agencije in vsakih pet let po tem upravni odbor naroči neodvisno zunanjo oceno izvajanja te uredbe na podlagi navodil, ki jih po posvetovanju s Komisijo izda upravni odbor.
Within three years from the date of the Agency having taken up its responsibilities, and every five years thereafter, the Management Board shall commission an independent external evaluation of the implementation of this Regulation on the basis of terms of reference issued by the Management Board after consultation with the Commission.
V treh letih po začetku izvajanja nalog agencije in vsaka tri leta po tem upravni odbor naroči neodvisno zunanjo oceno izvajanja te uredbe na podlagi navodil, ki jih po posvetovanju s Komisijo izda upravni odbor.
Within three years from the date of the Agency having taken up its responsibilities, and every three years thereafter, the Management Board shall commission an independent external evaluation of the implementation of this Regulation on the basis of terms of reference issued by the Management Board after consultation with the Commission.
Oceni se tudi ustreznost upravljavske strukture za izvajanje nalog agencije.
That evaluation shall also look at whether the management structure is appropriate for carrying out the Agency's tasks.
Ta ocena se posveti tudi vprašanju, ali je upravljavska struktura ustrezna za izvajanje nalog agencije.
This evaluation shall also look at whether the management structure is appropriate for carrying out the Agency's tasks.
Upravni odbor prejme rezultate ocenjevanja in predloži priporočila v zvezi s spremembami te uredbe, agencije in njenega načina dela Komisiji, ki jih skupaj z lastnim mnenjem in ustreznimi predlogi pošlje Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu.
The Management Board shall receive the evaluation and issue recommendations regarding changes to this Regulation, the Agency and its working practices to the Commission, which shall forward them, together with its own opinion as well as appropriate proposals, to the Council and the European Parliament.
Po potrebi se vključi delovni načrt s časovnim razporedom.
An action plan with a timetable shall be included, if appropriate.
Ocena in priporočila se objavijo.
Both the evaluation and the recommendations shall be made public.
Časovni razpored prihodnjih ocenjevanj, pri katerem se upoštevajo ugotovitve ocenjevalnega poročila iz odstavka 2, bi bilo treba obravnavati v ločenem in bolj podrobnem odstavku.
The timing of future evaluations, taking into account the findings of the evaluation report referred to in paragraph 2 should be treated in a separate and more detailed paragraph.
Glej predlog spremembe 21.
See amendment 21 below.
Člen 27 – odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Upravni odbor v soglasju s Komisijo določi časovni razpored prihodnjih ocenjevanj, pri čemer upošteva ugotovitve iz ocenjevalnega poročila iz odstavka 2.
The Management Board, in agreement with the Commission, shall decide the timing of future evaluations, taking into account the findings of the evaluation report referred to in paragraph 2.
Glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe 20.
See the justification of the amendment 20.
Člen 28 – odstavek 6 – točka a
Article 28 – paragraph 6 – point a
Člen 28 – odstavek 6 – točka (b a) (novo)
Article 28 – paragraph 6 – point b a (new)
(ba) svoj posodobljen večletni delovni program;
(ba) its updated multi-annual work programme;
Izvršni direktor proračunskemu organu letno posreduje vse podatke, pomembne za rezultat postopkov ocenjevanja .
The Executive Director shall forward annually to the budgetary authority any information relevant to the outcome of the evaluation procedures.
Izvršni direktor proračunskemu organu v skladu s členom 72(5) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 1 letno posreduje poročilo o številu in vrsti notranjih revizij, ki jih je opravil notranji revizor, njegovih priporočilih in ukrepih, sprejetih na podlagi teh priporočil .
The Executive Director shall forward annually to the budgetary authority a report summarising the number and type of internal audits conducted by the internal auditor, the recommendations made and the action taken on those recommendations, in accordance with Article 72(5) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 1 .
Zahteve, ki jih mora v skladu z finančnimi pravili izpolnjevati izvršni direktor, je treba natančno opredeliti.
The requirements made of the Executive Director pursuant to the financial regulation should be specified.
Člen 32 – naslov
Article 32 – Title
Začetek dejavnosti agencije
Start of the Agency's Activities
Sprememba naslova.
Change the title.
Člen 34 – naslov
Article 34 – Title
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, baronica Sarah Ludford (Baroness Sarah Ludford), Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolaou, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Ioan Enciu, Heidi Hautala, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Norica Nicolai, Zuzana Roithová, Michèle Striffler, Cecilia Wikström
Edit Bauer, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Ioan Enciu, Heidi Hautala, Mariya Nedelcheva, Norica Nicolai, Zuzana Roithová, Michèle Striffler, Cecilia Wikström
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Adrianu Severinu
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Adrian Severin
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Adrianu Severinu, ki jo je predložil romunski nacionalni protikorupcijski urad (urad tožilca na romunskem vrhovnem kasacijskem sodišču) 5. aprila 2011 in je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 6. aprila 2011,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Adrian Severin, forwarded by the National Anti-Corruption Department (Prosecutor's Office of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania) on 5 April 2011 and announced in plenary sitting on 6 April 2011,
– po zaslišanju Adriana Severina 23. maja 2011 v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Adrian Severin on 23 May 2011 in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju člena 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965, pa tudi člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Article 9 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
Zadeva št. 101/63, Wagner/Fohrmann in Krier, ECR 1964, str.
Case 101/63, Wagner/Fohrmann and Krier , ECR 1964, p.
195; Zadeva št. 149/85, Wybot/Faure in drugi, ECR 1986, str.
195; Case 149/85, Wybot/Faure and others , ECR 1986, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 72(2) romunske ustave,
– having regard to the provisions of Article 72(2) of the Romanian Constitution,
– ob upoštevanju člena 11 romunskega kazenskega zakonika, ki določa, da se romunsko kazensko pravo uporablja za kazniva dejanja, storjena zunaj romunskih meja, kadar je zadevno dejanje kaznivo tudi po kazenskem zakoniku države, v kateri je bilo storjeno,
– having regard to the provisions of Article 11 of the Romanian Criminal Code, according to which Romanian criminal law is applied to criminal offences committed outside Romanian borders where the act in question is an offence also under the criminal code of the country in which the act was committed,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0242/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0242/2011 ),
A. ker je romunski nacionalni protikorupcijski urad zahteval odvzem imunitete poslancu Evropskega parlamenta Adrianu Severinu, s čimer je romunskemu tožilcu omogočil, da uvede potrebne preiskave in sproži sodni postopek zoper Adriana Severina, zahteva preiskavo njegovega doma in pisarne in opravi pregled računalnika ali po potrebi drugih elektronskih naprav in začne kazenski postopek zoper poslanca Severina zaradi pasivne korupcije in/ali trgovanja z vplivom ali druge pravne opredelitve domnevnega kaznivega dejanja ali kaznivih dejanj pred pristojnim kazenskim sodiščem,
A. whereas Romania's National Anti-Corruption Department has requested the waiver of immunity of Adrian Severin, Member of the European Parliament, in order to enable the Romanian Prosecutor's Office to conduct the necessary investigations and to take legal action against Adrian Severin, to call for a search of his house or offices and to carry out computer checks or any other electronic searches which might be necessary, to initiate criminal proceedings against Mr Severin on the grounds of passive corruption and/or influence peddling or any other legal description that might be given to the alleged offence(s) before the criminal courts having jurisdiction,
B. ker je odvzem imunitete Adrianu Severinu povezan z domnevnimi koruptivnimi kaznivimi dejanji iz člena 6 romunskega zakona št. 78/2000 v povezavi s členom 254 (korupcija) in členom 257 (trgovanje z vplivom) kazenskega zakonika ter členom 81(b) zakona št. 78/2000,
B. whereas the waiver of the immunity of Adrian Severin concerns alleged corruption offences covered by Article 6 of Romanian Law No 78/2000 in conjunction with Article 254 (corruption) and Article 257 (influence peddling) of the Criminal Code and with Article 81(b) of Law No 78/2000,
C. ker Evropski parlament ni pristojen za izražanje mnenja glede krivde ali nekrivde poslanca niti glede tega, ali je zaradi dejanj, ki mu jih pripisujejo, kazenski pregon utemeljen,
C. whereas it is not the European Parliament's responsibility to express an opinion on the guilt or otherwise of the Member nor on whether or not the acts attributed to him warrant prosecution,
D. ker je zato primerno, da se v tem primeru priporoči odvzem poslanske imunitete,
D. whereas it is therefore advisable to recommend that parliamentary immunity be waived in the case in question,
2. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in poročilo pristojnega odbora nemudoma posreduje ustreznim organom Republike Romunije in Adrianu Severinu.
Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of the committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authorities of the Republic of Romania and to Adrian Severin.
Na plenarnem zasedanju z dne 6. aprila 2011 je predsednik skladno s členom 6(2) Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta sporočil, da je 5. aprila 2011 prejel pismo romunskega nacionalnega protikorupcijskega urada (urada tožilca na vrhovnem kasacijskem sodišču Romunije) z zahtevo, da se Adrianu Severinu odvzame poslanska imuniteta.
In the plenary sitting of 6 April 2011, the President announced, in accordance with Rule 6(2) of the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure, that he had received a letter from the National Anti-Corruption Department (Prosecutor's Office of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania) on 5 April 2011 requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Adrian Severin.
Predsednik je pismo v skladu s členom 6(2) Poslovnika posredoval pristojnemu odboru.
The President referred the request to the committee responsible, pursuant to Rule 6(2).
Romunski nacionalni protikorupcijski urad je 21. marca 2011 začel postopek zoper poslanca Evropskega parlamenta Adriana Severina na podlagi informacij, v skladu s katerimi naj bi poslanec Severin med decembrom 2010 in marcem 2011 izkoristil svoj položaj poslanca Evropskega parlamenta in domnevno sprejel ponudbo predstavnikov samooklicane lobistične družbe, ki se je predstavljala pod imenom Taylor Jones Public Affairs, o plačilu 100.000 EUR v zameno za njegovo podporo osnutku spremembe k Direktivi št. 94/19/ES o sistemih zajamčenih vlog, ki se je nanašala na časovni rok za povračilo deponentom v primeru propada banke v Evropskem parlamentu.
On 21 March 2011 the Romanian National Anti-Corruption Department instituted proceedings against Adrian Severin, Member of the European Parliament, on the basis of information according to which between December 2010 and March 2011 Mr Severin, exploiting his position as Member of the European Parliament, allegedly accepted an offer of payment of €100 000 from representatives of a self-styled lobbying company which presented itself under the name of 'Taylor Jones Public Affairs', in exchange for his support in the European Parliament for a draft amendment to Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes concerning the time limit for the reimbursement of depositors in the case of a bank failure.
Po trditvah romunskih organov obstajajo po opravljenih predhodnih preverjanjih (zlasti glede trditve nekega drugega poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, kopije računa in zvočnega posnetka, ki so ga posredovali mediji) resni razlogi za sum, da je poslanec Severin po doseženem dogovoru s predstavniki samooklicane lobistične družbe stopil v stik (osebno in prek svojega sekretariata) z vsaj enim poslancem Evropskega parlamenta, da bi poizvedel, ali je bil predlog spremembe v zvezi s časovnim rokom za povračilo deponentom v primeru propada banke vložen za razpravo v Odboru za pravne zadeve.
According to the Romanian authorities, the preliminary checks carried out (relating, in particular, to a statement by another Member of the European Parliament, a copy of the invoice and the audio recordings supplied by the media) have resulted in the serious suspicion that, after making a deal with the representatives of the self-styled lobbying company, Mr Severin contacted – both personally and through his secretariat – at least one other Member of the European Parliament with the aim of discovering whether an amendment had been tabled for discussion in the Committee on Legal Affairs concerning the time limit for the reimbursement of depositors in the case of a bank failure.
Potem ko je „predstavnikom lobistične družbe“ zagotovil, da je njihov predlog spremembe vložil v razpravo v Odboru za pravne zadeve drug romunski poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, Sebastian Bodu, jim je poslanec Severin obljubil, da bo podprl predlog spremembe in za opravljeno storitev zahteval plačilo začetnega obroka 12.000 EUR, kar potrjuje izdani račun.
After having assured the 'representatives of the lobbying company' that their amendment had been tabled for discussion in the Committee on Legal Affairs by another Romanian Member of the European Parliament, Sebastian Bodu, Mr Severin promised them he would support the amendment and requested payment of an initial instalment of €12 000 for services rendered – a sum for which an invoice was issued.
Po trditvah poslanca Severina mu je fiktivna družba Taylor Jones Public Affair, ki so si jo izmislili pri britanskem časopisu Sunday Times, obljubila plačano funkcijo člana v svoji mednarodni svetovalni skupini.
According to Mr Severin, Taylor Jones Public Affairs, a fake society created by the British newspaper 'Sunday Times', promised him a paid role as a member of its International Advisory Board.
V tej funkciji poslanec Severin, kot je zapisano tudi v predpogodbi, ne bi bil vključen v pripravo predlogov spremembe ali v promoviranje oziroma spreminjanje zakonodaje.
According to this role, as described also in the preliminary contract, Mr Severin would not be involved in the drafting of amendments or in promoting or changing legislation.
Po poslančevih besedah mu je bilo zagotovljeno, da je pogodba pravno neoporečna in da ne povzroča navzkrižja interesov z njegovo poslansko funkcijo.
According to Mr Severin, he was assured that this contract was legally above board and did not create any conflict of interest with his parliamentary duties.
Tudi račun, ki ga je predložil, se je nanašal na svetovalne storitve.
Moreover, the invoice he submitted had been for consultancy services.
Poslanec Bodu je vložil predlog spremembe, podoben tistemu, ki ga je zahtevala domnevna družba, vendar on sam ni imel nič s tem.
A similar amendment to that requested by the alleged company had been tabled by Mr Bodu and had nothing to do with him.
Poslanec Severin trdi, da je imel stike s fiktivno družbo in da je bil ogoljufan.
Mr Severin maintains that he had had relations with a fake company and had been deceived.
Trdi tudi, da to ni imelo pravnih posledic in da sam vsekakor nikoli ni opravljal svoje poslanske funkcije v zameno za denar.
He also maintains that this does not have any legal consequences and that, in any case, he has never carried out his parliamentary duties in exchange for money.
Poslanec Severin skratka izjavlja, da sta bila družba in pogodba fiktivni.
In short, according to Mr Severin, the company and contract were fake.
Nikoli ni lobiral, škode in bilo in izmenjanega denarja tudi ne, pa tudi nobenih sprememb zakonodaje.
He never did any lobbying, no damage was done and no money exchanged, and no amendments to legislation were made.
Opozoriti je treba, da so romunski organi svojo zahtevo utemeljili z danimi izjavami in zvočnimi posnetki, ki jih je posredovala družba, ki jo je ustvaril Sunday Times.
It should be noted that the Romanian authorities have based their request on the statements given and the audio recordings supplied by the company created by the Sunday Times.
Ta dokumentacija je rezultat manipulacije novinarjev Sunday Timesa, ki so vstopili v Parlament z uporabo lažne identitete in z namenom, da izvedejo goljufijo.
This documentation is the result of manipulation by Sunday Times reporters, who entered Parliament under a false identity and with the intention of committing fraud.