natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(ii) Vprašanja avtorskih pravic, vključno z deli, za katera imetniki pravic niso znani
(ii) Copyright issues, including orphan works
31. poudarja pomen del, ki so zaščitena z avtorskimi pravicami, vendar pa imetniki teh pravic niso znani, ker jih kljub vztrajnemu iskanju ni mogoče izslediti, ter da je treba za vsak posamezni sektor natančno določiti število in zvrst tovrstnih del, da bi lahko našli ustrezne rešitve;
Stresses the importance of orphan works – works which are covered under copyright, but whose rights-holders cannot be determined despite a diligent search – and the need to ascertain precisely, on a sector-by-sector basis, the number and type of such works in order to find appropriate solutions;
33. podpira namero Komisije o vzpostavitvi preprostih in stroškovno učinkovitih sistemov za podeljevanje in plačevanje pravic za digitalizacijo objavljenih del in njihovo dostopnost na internetu, v tesnem sodelovanju z vsemi, ki jih to zadeva;
Endorses the Commission's intention to establish a simple and cost-efficient rights clearance system for the digitisation of published works and their availability on the Internet, working in close cooperation with all the stakeholders involved;
34. zato pozdravlja in podpira pobude, kot je projekt ARROW
34.Therefore, welcomes and supports initiatives, such as the ARROW project
35. poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj vzpostavi evropsko bazo podatkov o delih, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani ali jih kljub dokumentiranemu in resnemu iskanju ni mogoče najti, ki bo omogočala izmenjavo informacij o lastništvu teh pravic in zmanjšala stroške pri podrobnem iskanju imetnikov;
Calls on the Commission to develop a European database of orphan works understood to be protected works whose rightholders are unknown or cannot be located, despite documented serious searches being made which would make it possible to exchange information on the ownership of rights and thereby reduce costs incurred in making diligent searches for rights-holders;
41. priporoča Komisiji, naj vztraja pri standardnem elektronskem formatu digitaliziranih del, da zagotovi združljivost digitaliziranih dokumentov s spletnim vmesnikom in podatkovno bazo;
Recommends to the Commission that it insist on a standard electronic format for the digitised works, so as to ensure that the digitised documents are compatible with the online interface and the database;
Financiranje in upravljanje
Financing and governance issues
(i) Pokroviteljstvo in javno-zasebna partnerstva
(i) Sponsorship and public - private partnerships
47. poudarja, da vključevanje zasebnih partnerjev v postopek digitalizacije ne sme pripeljati do nastanka zasebnih monopolov, ki bi ogrozili kulturno raznolikost in pluralizem, in da je spoštovanje konkurenčnih pravil osnovni pogoj za vključitev zasebnih podjetij;
Recalls that the involvement of private partners in the digitisation process must not lead to the creation of private monopolies, which would threaten cultural diversity and pluralism, and that compliance with the rules of competition is a prerequisite to the involvement of private companies;
(ii) EU in javna finančna podpora
(ii) EU and public financial support
(iii) Obveščanje in osveščanje
(iii) Information and awareness raising
60. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo informacijske kampanje in podobne dejavnosti, namenjene ozaveščanju o Europeani, potekale prek ustreznih partnerskih organizacij v državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that information campaigns and similar awareness-raising activities regarding Europeana are channelled through the relevant partnership organisations in the Member States;
62. meni, da morajo kulturne ustanove še naprej igrati pomembno vlogo pri čim bolj demokratičnem upravljanju projekta Europeana; te ustanove poziva, naj sodelujejo, da se prepreči podvajanje digitalizacije del in racionalizira uporaba virov;
Believes that cultural institutions must continue to play a major role in the governance, which should be as democratic as possible, of the Europeana project; and calls on them to collaborate in order to avoid duplicating works digitised and to rationalise use of resources;
http://www.europeana.eu – evropska spletna knjižnica, muzej in arhiv – je bila odprta novembra 2008 kot del pobude Komisije za digitalne knjižnice: njen namen je vsakomur omogočiti spletni dostop do evropske kulturne in znanstvene dediščine.
http://www.europeana.eu – Europe's online library, museum and archive – opened in November 2008 as part of the Commission's digital libraries initiative: the aim of this initiative is to make Europe's cultural and scientific heritage accessible to all on the internet.
Danes Europeana ponuja 6 milijona digitaliziranih del, vključno z zemljevidi, filmskimi posnetki in fotografijami.
Today, Europeana offers 6 million digitised works, including books, maps, film clips and photographs.
Cilj je doseči 10 milijonov enot do junija 2010, ko je predviden izid nove različice Europeane.
The objective is to reach 10 million objects by June 2010, when a new version of Europeana is supposed to be launched.
V drugi fazi projekta bo leta 2011 objavljena popolnoma delujoča stran Europeana.eu, ki bo bolj večjezična in bo vsebovala značilnosti semantičnega spleta.
The second phase of the project will see the launch in 2011 of a fully operational Europeana.eu, which will be more multilingual in character and will have semantic web features.
Dodatna prednost za uporabnike je ta, da lahko na Europeani najdejo informacije v svojem maternem jeziku.
The additional value to users is that Europeana makes it possible to find information in their own mother tongues.
Europeano financirajo program eContent plus , Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije ter nekatere države članice in kulturne ustanove.
Europeana is funded by the e Content plus programme, by the Competitiveness and Innovation programme, and by some Member States and cultural institutions.
Fundacija za evropsko digitalno knjižnico je bila ustanovljena z namenom omogočiti interdisciplinarni dostop do evropske kulturne dediščine.
The European Digital Library Foundation has been created with a goal to provide cross-domain access to Europe's cultural heritage.
Spletno stran ureja urad Europeane, ki ga gosti Nizozemska narodna knjižnica.
The site is run by the Europeana office, hosted by the Dutch National Library.
Več kot 1000 kulturnih ustanov prispeva vsebine v Europeano (neposredno ali prek zbirnih mest) in več kot 150 ustanov sodeluje v njenem partnerskem omrežju.
More than 1000 cultural institutions contribute content to Europeana (directly or through aggregators) and more than 150 institutions have joined its partner network.
Komisija se zdaj osredotoča na naslednjo stopnjo razvoja Europeane.
The Commission now looks ahead to the next phase of development of Europeana.
Njen namen je z Europeano in povezanimi ukrepi za digitalizacijo, spletno dostopnost in digitalno hrambo zagotoviti evropski kulturi trajno razpoznavnost na internetu ter spremeniti našo skupno in raznoliko dediščino v sestavni del bodoče evropske informacijske infrastrukture.
The aim is to ensure that Europeana and the underlying policies for digitisation, online accessibility and digital preservation, give European culture a lasting visibility on the internet and turn our common and diverse heritage into an integral part of Europe's information infrastructure for the future.
O razvoju Europeane v prihodnosti je potekalo tudi javno posvetovanje.
A public consultation was also launched on the further development of Europeana.
Med drugim so bili obravnavani načini vključevanja zasebnega sektorja prek javno-zasebnih partnerstev v nadaljnji razvoj Europeane in načini iskanja po avtorsko zaščitenih vsebinah prek Europeane.
It dealt amongst other things with the way in which the private sector can be involved in the further development of Europeana through public private partnerships, and how in-copyright content can be made searchable through Europeana.
V svoji resoluciji z dne 27. septembra 2007 o „i2010: na poti do evropske digitalne knjižnice“ je Evropski parlament izrazil močno podporo ideji vzpostavljanja evropske digitalne knjižnice v obliki skupne, večjezične točke dostopa do evropske kulturne dediščine.
In its resolution of 27 September 2007 on "i2010: towards a European digital library", the European Parliament expressed its strong support for the idea of establishing a European digital library in the form of a common, multilingual access point to European cultural heritage.
Zdaj, ko postaja resničnost, pa Europeana potrebuje politično podporo Evropskega parlamenta, saj sta moč in kakovost tega projekta odvisni od oblikovanja trajnostnega modela financiranja in upravljanja, iskanja rešitev za množično digitalizacijo avtorsko zaščitenih gradiv in od ozaveščanja držav članic o pomembnosti tovrstnih prizadevanj.
Now, at a time when Europeana is becoming a reality, it needs clear political backing from the European Parliament, since the staying-power and quality of this project depend on creating a sustainable financing and governance model, on finding solutions for mass-digitizing copyrighted materials, and on raising awareness about the importance of such an endeavour among the Member States.
Glavna vprašanja glede vsebine
Main issues concerning content
Digitalizacija kulturnih izdelkov, vključno s knjigami, je dolgotrajen in drag proces, ki zahteva tesno sodelovanje med imetniki pravic, kulturnimi ustanovami in informacijsko-komunikacijskimi podjetji, pa tudi med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem.
The digitisation of cultural products, including books, is an extensive and expensive undertaking that requires close cooperation between rights-holders, cultural institutions and ICT companies, as well as between the public and private sectors.
Katere vsebine bodo digitalizirane in dodane Europeani, določajo države članice in njihove kulturne ustanove v skladu z njihovimi kulturnimi in/ali informacijskimi politikami.
The selection of content to be digitised and brought into Europeana is determined by the Member States and their cultural institutions, in line with their cultural and/or information policies.
Prispevek različnih držav članic k Europeani je zelo neenak , tako glede števila enot kakor tudi glede vrst gradiv.
The contribution by different Member States to Europeana is very uneven , both in terms of number of objects and types of material.
Zgolj 5 % vseh digitaliziranih knjig je dostopnih na Europeani.
Only 5% of all digital books are available in Europeana.
Skoraj polovica jih je iz Francije.
Almost half of these come from France.
Druge države, ki veliko prispevajo, so Nemčija (16 %), Nizozemska (8%), in Združeno kraljestvo (8 %).
Other big contributing countries are Germany (16%), the Netherlands (8%), and the United Kingdom (8%).
Vse preostale države pa prispevajo po 5 % ali manj.
All other countries provide 5% or less each.
Z naglim razvojem množične digitalizacije drugod po svetu je vedno bolj nujno, da resneje poprimemo za nalogo obsežne digitalizacije evropske kulturne dediščine.
With mass digitisation taking off in other parts of the world, it becomes urgent to engage more seriously with the task of large-scale digitisation of European cultural heritage.
Posebno pozornost je treba posvetiti tistim delom, ki so krhka in bi lahko zelo kmalu propadla, med njimi predvsem avdiovizualnemu gradivu.
Special attention should be paid to those works which are fragile and might cease to exist very soon and, among those, audiovisual materials.
Prvotni namen je bil osredotočiti se na možnosti, ki jih ponuja tekstovno gradivo, pri katerem avtorske pravice ne veljajo več.
The initial aim was to concentrate on the potential provided by out-of-copyright text material.
Zaradi pravnih razlogov Europeana ne vsebuje niti razprodanih knjig ( okrog 90 % vsebine nacionalnih knjižnic) niti del, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani ( približno 10–20 odstotkov avtorsko zaščitenih nacionalnih zbirk), saj njihovih ustvarjalcev ni mogoče določiti.
For legal reasons, Europeana includes neither out-of-print books ( some 90% of the content of national libraries) nor orphan works ( estimated at 10% to 20% of national in-copyright collections), whose authors cannot be identified.
Hkrati pa je jasno, da je treba najti rešitve o načinu vključevanja avtorsko zaščitenega gradiva.
At the same time it is clear that solutions should be found on how to include in-copyright material.
To je zlasti pomembno, če želimo preprečiti nastanek „črne luknje 20. stoletja“, tj. stanje, v katerem je na spletu dostopno veliko kulturnega gradiva izpred leta 1900, vendar zelo malo gradiva iz bližnje preteklosti.
This is especially important in order to avoid a ‘20th century black hole’ - a situation in which much cultural material from before 1900 is accessible on the web, but very little material is available from the more recent past.
Da bi to dosegli, je potrebno tesno sodelovanje med kulturnimi ustanovami in imetniki pravic, pri čemer je treba spoštovati zakonodajo o avtorskih pravicah.
This requires close collaboration between cultural institutions and right holders, in full respect of copyright legislation.
Posebej pereč problem je na področju del,za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, pri katerih je nemogoče ali izjemno težko določiti imetnike pravic.
A particularly acute problem exists in the area of orphan works , i.e. works for which it is impossible or very difficult to trace the rightful holders.
Večina držav članic je od izdaje priporočila Komisije iz leta 2006 o digitalizaciji in digitalni hrambi dosegla le skromen napredek.
Most Member States have made little progress after the Commission issued its 2006 Recommendation on digitisation and digital preservation.
Vprašanju del, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, je bila večja pozornost namenjena zaradi sodne poravnave, dosežene v Združenih državah Amerike v zvezi s projektom Googlov iskalnik knjig, ki zadeva veliko tovrstnih del.
The issue of orphan works has attracted increasing attention as a result of the Google Book Search legal case settlement in the United States of America which concerns many of these works.
(Googlov iskalnik knjig je tržni projekt, ki ga razvija eno izmed največjih podjetij na trgu internetnih storitev.
(Google Books is a commercial project developed by one of the most important players in the Internet services market.
Svojim uporabnikom omogoča, da po vnosu ključnih besed v iskalnik pregleduje prosto dostopne knjige ali odlomke iz avtorsko zaščitenih knjig).
It allows users to view online public domain books or snippets of in-copyright books after having conducted a keyword-based search.)
Poravnava je bila sporazumna rešitev med Googlom ter združenjem ameriških založnikov in ameriškim avtorskim združenjem, s katero se je zaključila tožba zaradi kršitve avtorskih pravic.
This settlement is an agreement between Google and the Association of American Publishers and the Authors’ Guild to settle a legal action for breach of copyright.
Poravnava, sklenjena v ZDA, pa velja le za primere, ko Google uporabi knjige za tržne namene v Združenih državah.
The US settlement only applies to commercial exploitation of books by Google in the United States.
Če pa bodo digitalizirane knjige evropskih avtorjev zaradi te poravnave dostopne samo na ozemlju ZDA, se lahko pojavi vrzel v znanju med Evropo in ZDA.
Nevertheless, it may lead to the creation of a knowledge gap between the Europe and the USA if the digitised books of European authors become available only from the territory of the USA as a consequence of this settlement.
Google bi tako lahko de facto postal monopolist kot edini vir izjemne moči pri iskanju, distribuciji in prodaji knjig.
Google could end up in de facto monopoly position as the sole source of ultimate power in book discovery, distribution and sales.
Komisija mora zato pozorno spremljati razvoj dogodkov.
The Commission therefore needs to have a close look at how the situation develops.
Treba je sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi se izognili novi digitalni razdeljenosti in zaščitili dolgoročne skupne evropske interese.
All necessary steps should be taken so as to avoid a new digital divide and to protect common long-term European interests.
Evropski način se razlikuje od pristopa pri Googlovem iskalniku knjig, saj je Europeana storitev, ki je na voljo povsod po svetu in ki si prizadeva za visoko kakovostne vsebine ter spoštovanje zakonodaje o avtorskih pravicah.
The European way is different from the Google Books approach as Europeana is a service available worldwide, and strives for high-quality content and full respect for copyright legislation.
Tega se moramo zavedati tudi pri iskanju rešitev za večplastne probleme, ki nastajajo v povezavi z zakonodajo o avtorskih pravicah, ki se po posameznih državah članicah EU močno razlikuje .
This should be kept in mind when looking for solutions to the manifold problems which arise around copyright legislations, which happen to differ widely amongst EU Member States.
Trenutne pobude, kot je ARROW (Dosegljivi registri informacij o pravicah in delih, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani), projekt, ki vsakemu uporabniku omogoča, da z uporabo na evropski ravni razvitega vmesnika preveri, ali je neko delo dostopno, poteklo ali pa nima avtorja, ter pridobi informacije o imetnikih avtorskih pravic, so izjemno koristni pripomočki za lajšanje pridobivanja in plačevanja pravic za dela, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani.
At the moment, initiatives such as ARROW (Accessible Registries of Rights Information and Orphan Works), a project which allows any user to verify whether a work is available, expired or orphan by using an interface developed at European level, and to obtain information on copyright holders, are very useful tools in facilitating the rights clearance for orphan works.
Trenutni projekti digitalizacije v Evropi kažejo na vedno bolj prisoten problem s prosto dostopnimi vsebinami po spremembi formata.
Ongoing digitisation projects in Europe show an emerging problem with public domain materials after the format shift.
Ključno je, da knjige, ki so v analognem svetu prosto dostopne, to ostanejo tudi v digitalnem svetu in so na voljo najširšemu možnemu občinstvu.
It is essential that books in the public domain in the analogue world, remain in the public domain in the digital world and that they can be enjoyed by the widest possible audience.
V Evropi obstajajo številni različni pristopi, zaradi katerih se pojavljajo pravna vprašanja o pravicah, izhajajočih iz digitalizacije.
There exists a wide range of approaches in Europe, which raise legal questions about rights created by digitisation.
Med problematičnimi točkami pri prosto dostopnem gradivu je npr. domneva o novem svežnju pravic, ki bi jih ustvarila z digitalizacija, zagotavljanje izključnih pravic do prosto dostopnih del posameznemu podjetju za digitalizacijo, pa tudi ozemeljske omejitve dostopa do kulturnih vsebin, ki se lahko pojavijo med procesom digitalizacije.
Among problematic points for public domain material is, e.g., the assumption of a new layer of rights that would be created by digitization, the granting of exclusive rights on public domain works to the digitizing company, as well as territorial limitations to access cultural content which may accrue during the process of digitisation.
Finančna vprašanja
Financing issues
Model financiranja Evropske digitalne knjižnice se iz prvotnega popolnega financiranja s strani Skupnosti (do leta 2009 preko projekta EDL-net, ki se je sofinanciral preko programa eContentplus) razvil v model, v katerem sredstev ne zagotovi samo Komisija (v okviru Okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije) ampak tudi države članice, nekatere kulturne ustanove in pokrovitelji iz zasebnega sektorja (od leta 2009 do konca leta 2013)
The financing model for the European digital library has evolved from an exclusively Community-funded one (until 2009 through the EDL-net project co-funded by the e Content plus programme) to a model where financing does not come only from the Commission (through the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme) but also from the Member States, some cultural institutions, and from private sector sponsorship (from 2009 until the end of 2013).
Treba je razviti nove metode financiranja, da bo mogoče opredeliti trajnosten model financiranja za obdobje po letu 2013 .
New methods of financing must be developed so as to find a sustainable financing model from 2013 onwards.
Eden od predvidenih načinov je odmik od sedanjega financiranja na osnovi projektov osredotočanje na javno-zasebna partnerstva ter bolj strukturirane prispevke javnih ustanov.
One of the ways envisaged is to move away from the present project-based financing towards public-private partnerships and more structured contributions by public institutions.
Javno-zasebna partnerstva je mogoče razviti v različnih oblikah, kot so zasebno pokroviteljstvo , plačilo povezav, ki jih Europeana posreduje do vsebin organizacij, ki s temi vsebinami služijo, pa tudi daljnosežnejši modeli partnerstva , v katerih bi bil zasebni sektor neposredno vključen v upravljanje Europeane in bi z upravljanjem te strani ustvarjal zaslužek.
Public private partnerships can be developed in various forms, such as private sponsoring, payment for the links provided by Europeana to the content of organisations that generate income from this content, as well as further-reaching partnership models, where the private sector would be directly involved in running Europeana and generating revenues to operate the site.
Vse rešitve pa bi vedno morale temeljiti na jasnih pogojih in skupnih smernicah.
This should be always done on the basis of well-understood conditions and common guidelines.
Modeli javnega financiranja bi morali vključevati povečanje prispevkov držav članic in neprekinjene prispevke Skupnosti po letu 2013 .
Public funding models should include both an increased contribution by the Member States and a continuous Community contribution after 2013.
Kratkoročna naloga bi bila rešitev za dragi proces množične digitalizacije v okviru lizbonske strategije, ki se trenutno odvija.
An immediate task would be to deal with the costly process of mass digitisation under the currently evolving Lisbon strategy.
Eden od načinov bi bil, da se del stroškov digitalizacije krije iz naslednje generacije programov Skupnosti in se to upošteva v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru.
One way forward would be to cover part of the costs of digitisation from the next generation of Community programmes and to take account of this in the next Multiannual Financial Framework.
Trenutna recesija ne more biti razlog za zmanjšanje sredstev, namenjenih informacijski družbi, digitalizaciji in podobnemu.
The current recession cannot be a reason to cut funding for the information society, digitization, and the like.
Potrebna je ustrezna kampanja za bodoče financiranje, vključno z donatorskimi konferencami, da se okrepi zavest o Europeani ter na splošno o ogromnem obsegu dela in prizadevanj, ki so potrebna za doseganje pomembnega napredka pri obsežni digitalizaciji evropske kulturne dediščine.
A proper campaign for future funding is needed, including fund-raising conferences, in order to heighten awareness of Europeana and more broadly, of the sheer volume of work and effort needed to make significant progress in the task of large-scale digitisation of European cultural heritage.
o Europeani – naslednji koraki
on Europeana - the next steps
Pripravljavec mnenja: Ioan Enciu
Rapporteur: Ioan Enciu
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko poziva Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Culture and Education, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker mora biti dostop do kulturnih in izobraževalnih informacij ena od prednostnih nalog, da bi se izboljšali standardi izobraževanja in življenjski standard,
A. whereas access to cultural and educational information must be a priority in order to improve educational and living standards,