natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog Uredbe – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Priloga – oddelek 3.7 – točka 1a (novo)
Annex – section 3.7 – point 1a (new)
Direktiva 2003/37/ES
Directive 2003/37/EC
Člen 19 – odstavek 2
Article 19 – paragraph 2
Člen 19(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 19(2) is replaced by the following:
Komisija prilagodi priloge pri uvedbi novih predpisov ali sprememb obstoječih predpisov, ki jih je sprejela Skupnost, na podlagi Sklepa 97/836/ES [...].
The Commission shall adapt the Annexes if [...] pursuant to Decision 97/836/EC, new regulations or amendments to existing regulations which the Community has accepted are introduced [...].
Navedeni ukrepi, ki so namenjeni spremembi nebistvenih določb te direktive, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 20(3).“
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 20(3)."
V predlogu Komisije so določbe o komitologiji iz direktive 2003/37/ES le deloma prilagojene postopku RPP, za uporabo členov 15(2) in 19(2) pa se uporablja (stari) regulativni postopek.
The Commission proposal only partially aligns the comitology provisions of the Directive 2003/37/EC to the RPS procedure and maintains the (old) regulatory procedure for the application of Articles 15(2) and 19(2).
Prva opomba zadeva zaščitne klavzule posameznih držav članic, druga pa prilagoditev prilog.
Whereas the former concerns safeguard clauses of individual Member States, the latter concerns adaptation of the Annexes.
Podobno kot v primeru člena 39 nedavno sprejete direktive 2007/46 o homologaciji vozil bi moral za takšne določbe veljati regulativni postopek s pregledom.
Similarly to Article 39 of the recently adopted Directive 2007/46 on type-approval of vehicles, such provisions should come under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Priloga – oddelek 5.8 – točka 3a (novo)
Annex – section 5.8 – point 3a (new)
(3a) Člen 7 se črta.
(3a) Article 7 shall be deleted.
Predlog Komisije sploh ne spreminja člena 7 uredbe (ES) št. 1161/2005, čeprav že drugič omenja pooblastila, ki so že podeljena v členih 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) in 6(1), ter zanje v členu 8(2) določi (stari) regulativni postopek.
Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1161/2005 is not modified at all by the Commission proposal, although it refers for a second time to the powers already conferred in Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1), and submits them via Article 8(2) to the (old) regulatory procedure.
Poleg tega spremenjene določbe členov 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) in 6(1) za ta ista pooblastila določajo regulativni postopek s pregledom iz novega člena 8(3).
Moreover, modified provisions of Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1) submit the same powers to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in the new Article 8(3).
Obenem člen 7 ne omenja člena 3(4), za katerega ostaja veljaven regulativni postopek.
At the same time, Article 7 does not contain a reference to Article 3(4), for which the regulatory procedure remains.
Zato je treba člen 7 črtati.
Article 7 should therefore be deleted.
Priloga – oddelek 6.2 – točka 1
Annex – section 6.2 – point 1
Člen 3 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) določi merila in postopek za imenovanje Registra; ta ukrep za spremembo nebistvenih elementov te uredbe z njeno dopolnitvijo se sprejme v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 6(4); v nujnih primerih lahko Komisija uporabi nujni postopek iz člena 6(5);
(a) establish the criteria and the procedure for the designation of the Registry; this measure, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 6(4); on imperative grounds of urgency, the Commission may use the urgent procedure referred to in Article 6(5);
(a) določi merila in postopek za imenovanje Registra; ta ukrep za spremembo nebistvenih elementov te uredbe z njeno dopolnitvijo se sprejme v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 6(4);
(a) establish the criteria and the procedure for the designation of the Registry; this measure, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 6(4);
Možnost uporabe nujnega postopka ni upravičena, zato jo je treba črtati.
The possibility to use the urgency procedure is not justified and should be deleted.
Priloga – oddelek 6.2 – točka 2
Annex – section 6.2 – point 2
Člen 5 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Po posvetovanju z Registrom Komisija sprejme pravila javnega reda v zvezi z izvajanjem in funkcijami .eu TLD in načela javnega reda glede registracije.
After consulting the Registry, the Commission shall adopt public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the .eu TLD and the public policy principles on registration.
Navedeni ukrepi za spremembo nebistvenih določb te uredbe z njeno dopolnitvijo se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 6(3).
Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 6(3).
V nujnih primerih lahko Komisija uporabi nujni postopek iz člena 6(5).
On imperative grounds of urgency, the Commission may use the urgent procedure referred to in Article 6(5).
Priloga – oddelek 6.2 – točka 3
Annex – section 6.2 – point 3
Člen 6 – odstavek 5
Article 6 – paragraph 5
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporabljata člen 5a(1), (2), (4) in (6) ter člen 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES, ob upoštevanju določb člena 8 Sklepa.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1), (2), (4) and (6) and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Člen 6(5) postane nepotreben, če se sprejmeta predloga spremembe 3 in 4 iz poročila.
If amendments 3 and 4 of the Report are adopted, Article 6(5) becomes obsolete.
Priloga – oddelek 7.1 – točka 15
Annex – section 7.1 – point 15
Direktiva 2005/36/ES
Directive 2005/36/EC
Člen 58 – odstavek 2
Article 58 – paragraph 2
Rok iz člena 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES je dva meseca.
The period provided for in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at two months.
Člen 58(2) postane nepotreben, če se sprejme predlog spremembe člena 61(2).
If amendment to Article 61(2) is adopted, Article 58(2) becomes obsolete.
Priloga – oddelek 7.1 – točka 15a (novo)
Annex – section 7.1 – point 15a (new)
Člen 61 – odstavek 2
Article 61 – paragraph 2
V členu 61 se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
The second paragraph of Article 61 is replaced by the following:
„Kadar je to primerno, Komisija […] sklene državi članici dovoliti, da v omejenem obdobju odstopa od teh določb.
" Where appropriate, the Commission shall decide [...] to permit the Member State in question to derogate from the provision in question for a limited period.
Navedeni ukrepi, ki so namenjeni spremembi nebistvenih določb te direktive, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 58(3).“
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 58(3)."
V predlogu Komisije le člen 61 ni prilagojen postopku RPP.
Only Article 61 is not aligned to the RPS procedure in the Commission proposal.
Ta člen vsebuje splošno klavzulo za odstopanje držav članic, pri čemer se lahko Komisija precej svobodno odloča.
This article provides for a general derogation clause for Member States and the Commission's margin of discretion is large.
Takšno odstopanje je lahko opredeljeno kot začasna prilagoditev področja uporabe direktive, kot tako (v skladu s pravno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, ki je v primeru C-168/93 pokazalo, da so odstopanja od osnovnega akta sama po sebi ukrepi splošnega obsega) pa bi moralo biti prilagojeno regulativnemu postopku s pregledom.
Such derogation can be regarded as a temporary modification of the Directive's scope of application, and as such (in line with the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice that indicated in Case C-168/93 that derogations to a basic act are in themselves measures of general scope) should also be adapted to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
UL C 203, 17.07.99, str.
OJ C 203, 17.7.1999, p.
UL L 200, 22.07.06, str.
OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p.
KOM(2007) 0740. , je Evropska komisija med drugim pripravila predlog, po katerem se z novim regulativnim postopkom s pregledom (RPP) prilagodi 59 zakonodajnih aktov.
COM(2007)0740 . , the European Commission presented inter alia this proposal, covering 59 legislative acts to be adapted to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS).
Poročevalec je drugim odborom predlagal, da se čim hitreje določijo paketi za prilagoditev, da bi se regulativni postopek s pregledom lahko začel uporabljati za obstoječi acquis še pred začetkom veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe (v kateri so pomembne določbe o delegiranih aktih, ki bodo nadomestile regulativni postopek s pregledom, a ne bodo kar takoj sprejeti s soodločanjem).
The Rapporteur proposed to other committees that the alignment packages should be adopted as soon as possible, in order for the RPS procedure to start applying to the existing acquis before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon (which contains important provisions on delegated acts, which will replace RPS, but which will take time to be adopted via codecision).
Pričujoče poročilo vsebuje omejeno število predlogov sprememb, ki so jih drugi odbori predlagali v svojih mnenjih, ki so bila prejeta v obliki pisem.
The present Report contains a limited number of amendments that were suggested by other committees in their opinions, received in form of letters.
Eden od predlogov sprememb je tehnične narave in je namenjen črtanju odvečnega člena v eni od uredb.
One amendment is of a technical character, aiming at deletion of a superfluous Article in one of the regulations.
Giuseppe Gargani,
Mr Giuseppe Gargani
Spoštovani gospod Gargani
Dear Mr Gargani,
Skupinski predlog („omnibus“) – I. del
Regarding Omnibus - Part I
Uredba (ES) št. 184/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. januarja 2005 o statistiki Skupnosti glede plačilne bilance, mednarodne trgovine s storitvami in neposrednih tujih naložb – COM(2007)0741 – 2007/0262 (COD)
Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 on Community statistics concerning balance of payments, international trade in services and foreign direct investment COM(2007)0741 – 2007/0262 (COD)
Uredba 184/2005 predvideva tri primere, v katerih se uporablja komitologija.
Regulation 184/2005 has three instances whereby comitology is used.
V skupinskem predlogu („omnibus“) je Komisija predlagala, da se v dveh od omenjenih primerov uporablja regulativni postopek s pregledom, in sicer pri določanju standardov kakovosti za statistiko na tem področju ter vsebine in pogostosti poročil o kakovosti ter pri posodabljanju zahtev za podatke in opredelitev.
In the Omnibus proposal, the Commission proposes the regulatory procedure with scrutiny for two of those instances, namely when setting of quality standards of statistics in the field, as well as the content and periodicity of the quality reports and when updating of data requirements and updating of definitions.
Regulativni postopek (brez pregleda, člen 5 sklepa o komitologiji) pa bo še naprej veljal za opredeljevanje oblike in postopka za prenos podatkov, ki jih države članice posredujejo Komisiji.
The regulatory procedure (without scrutiny, article 5 of the comitology decision) will continue to apply with regard to establishing the format and procedure for the transmission of data from the Member States to the Commission.
Edinega primera, kjer se ne bo uporabljal regulativni postopek s pregledom, si ni mogoče razlagati kot ukrep splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb te uredbe ali njeno dopolnitev, saj zadeva samo odločitve o obliki in prenosu podatkov.
The only instance whereby the regulatory procedure with scrutiny will not apply cannot be considered to be a measure of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of the Regulation or to supplement it since it only concerns decisions on "format" and "transmission" of data.
PISMO ODBORA ZA EKONOMSKE IN MONETARNE ZADEVE
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS
József Szájer, poslanec
Mr. József Szájer, MEP
Spoštovani poročevalec
Dear Rapporteur,
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve (ECON) je pregledal prve tri predloge „omnibus“
The Economic and monetary affairs committee (ECON) has looked at the three first "omnibus proposals
Opazili smo, da le prvo besedilo ( KOM(2007)0741 ) v točkah 5.1 in 5.8 zadeva nekatere izmed naših pristojnosti.
We have noted that only the first text ( COM(2007)0741 ) deals with some of our competencies in the points 5.1 and 5.8.
Točka 5.1 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 696/93 z dne 15. marca 1993 o statističnih enotah za opazovanje in analizo gospodarstva v Skupnosti
Point 5.1 Council regulation (EEC) No 696/93 of 15 March 1993 on statistical units for the observation and analysis of the production system in the Community
Na splošno se zdi, da je predlog skladen s Sklepom 1999/468/ES, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2006/512/ES.
In general the proposal appears to be compatible with Decision 1999/468/EC as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC.
Natančneje, s predlogom se doseže potrebna prilagoditev, s tem ko se upravljalni postopek v členu 6, kar zadeva prilagoditev prilog, nadomesti z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom.
More precisely the proposal does the necessary adaptation by replacing the management procedure with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in Article 6 concerning the adaptation of annexes.
Obseg pristojnosti v členu 5 ni povsem jasen in bi ga bilo treba v idealnih razmerah pojasniti, da se zagotovi, da se ne spremenijo nobeni elementi temeljnega instrumenta.
The scope of the power in Article 5 is not entirely clear and should in an ideal situation be clarified in order to make sure no amendment of any elements of the basic acts are modified.
Glede na zelo stroge roke, ki se uporabljajo za pričujoči predlog, pa se to ne zdi neobhodno.
However, in view of the very strict deadlines applicable to the present proposal, this does not seem indispensable.
Točka 5.8 Uredbe (ES) št. 1161/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. julija 2005 o sestavljanju četrtletnih nefinančnih računov po institucionalnih sektorjih
Point 5.8 regulation (EC) No 1161/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 on the compilation of quarterly non-financial accounts by institutional sector
Tudi v tem primeru se zdi, da je predlog – z opazno izjemo člena 7 – skladen s Sklepom 1999/468/ES, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2006/512/ES.
In this case also, the proposal seems to be compatible with Decision 1999/468/EC as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC with the notable exception of Article 7.
Členi 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) in 6(1) vsi vsebujejo določbe, ki bi spremenile obveznosti držav članic iz uredbe, ki so nebistveni elementi temeljnega instrumenta.
Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1) all contain provisions that would modify the obligations of the member States under the Regulation, constituting non essential elements of the basic instrument.
Zato je upravičen regulativni postopek s pregledom.
The regulatory procedure with scrutiny is thus justified.
Predlaga se, da pristojnosti, podeljene Komisiji v členu 3(4), ostanejo v okviru (navadnega) regulativnega postopka.
It is proposed that the power conferred on the Commission in Article 3(4) remain under the (normal) regulatory procedure.
Te pristojnosti za določen čas omogočajo nekatera odstopanja od obveznosti držav članic, če nacionalni statistični sistemi zahtevajo večje prilagoditve.
This power allows certain derogations for a limited time to the obligations of the Member States if national statistical systems require major adaptation.
Dovoljeni ukrepi so torej začasni in prehodni.
The measures allowed are thus temporary and transitional.
Na osnovi tega je mogoče trditi, da ne spreminjajo nobenega nebistvenega elementa v smislu člena 2(2) Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
On this basis it is possible to argue that they do not modify any non essential element in the sense of Article 2(2) of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Zdi pa se, da je bila storjena napaka v zvezi s členom 7 uredbe (ES) 1161/2005.
However, a mistake appears to have been made in respect of Article 7 of regulation (EC) 1161/2005.
Po predlogu, kakršen je zdaj, se ta člen sploh ne spremeni.
This Article is not modified at all as the proposal stands.
Ta člen že drugič omenja pooblastila, ki so že podeljena s členi 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) in 6(1).
This article refers a second time to the powers already conferred in Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1).
Zato bi se utegnil zdeti odvečen.
It could therefore seem to be superfluous.
Še pomembneje je ugotoviti, da člen 7 določa urejanje teh pristojnosti v skladu s členom 8(2), ki se nanaša na (navaden) regulativni postopek.
More important is to note that Article 7 submits these powers to Article 8(2) which refers to the (normal) regulatory procedure.
Člen 7 bi bilo treba črtati.
Article 7 should be deleted.
Če o tem ni mogoče doseči dogovora je nujno, da se v členu 7 spremeni vsaj sklicevanje s člena 8(2) na člen 8(3).
If that would not be agreed upon, it is indispensable to at least change the reference in Article 7 from Article 8(2) to Article 8(3).
Zato prosimo, naj vaš odbor vnese predlog spremembe, s katerim se črta člen 7.
We consequently request your committee to introduce an amendment deleting article 7.
Seveda sem na voljo, da o tem vprašanju podrobneje razpravljam z vami.
I am obviously available to further discuss the issue with you.
PISMO ODBORA ZA ZAPOSLOVANJE IN SOCIALNE ZADEVE
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
Mnenje Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve za Odbor za pravne zadeve o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prilagoditvi nekaterih aktov, za katere se uporablja postopek iz člena 251 Pogodbe, Sklepu Sveta 1999/468/ES, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2006/512/ES, glede regulativnega postopka s pregledom ( KOM(2007)0741 konč. – 2007/0262(COD) )
Opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs for the Committee on Legal Affairs on the Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny( COM(2007) 741 final – 2007/0262 (COD))
Spoštovani gospod predsednik
Dear Mr Gargani,
Na plenarnem zasedanju 15. januarja 2008 je predsednik Evropskega parlamenta razglasil zgoraj navedeni predlog Komisije.
On 15 January 2008, the President announced in plenary that he had received the above Commission proposal.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je bil imenovan kot pristojni odbor za celotni predlog Komisije, Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve pa je bil zaprošen za mnenje o naslednjih točkah iz priloge: točka 2.1, točka 2.2, točka 2.3, točka 2.4, točka 2.5 točka 2.6 in točka 5.4.
The proposal as a whole was referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, while our Committee on Employment and Social Affairs was asked to deliver an opinion on the following parts of the Annex: point 2.1, point 2.2, point 2.3, point 2.4, point 2.5 point 2.6 and point 5.4.
Omenjene točke iz priloge k predlogu Komisije se navezujejo na prilagoditev naslednjih zakonodajnih aktov:
These points of the Annex to the Commission proposal relate to the adjustment of the following legislative instruments:
Priloga 2.1: Direktiva Sveta 89/391/EGS z dne 12. junija 1989 o uvajanju ukrepov za spodbujanje izboljšav varnosti in zdravja delavcev pri delu
Annex 2.1: Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work;
Priloga 2.2: Direktiva Sveta 92/29/EGS z dne 31. marca 1992 o minimalnih varnostnih in zdravstvenih zahtevah za izboljšanje medicinske oskrbe na ladjah
Annex 2.2 : Council Directive 92/29/EEC of 31 March 1992 on the minimum safety and health requirements for improved medical treatment on board vessels;
Priloga 2.3: Direktiva 2002/44/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. junija 2002 o minimalnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtevah glede izpostavljenosti delavcev tveganjem iz fizikalnih dejavnikov (vibracij) (šestnajsta posebna direktiva v smislu člena 16(1) Direktive 89/391/EGS)
Annex 2.3 : Directive 2002/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (vibration) (sixteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Priloga 2.4 : Direktiva 2003/10/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. februarja 2003 o minimalnih zahtevah za varnost in zdravje v zvezi z izpostavljenostjo delavcev fizikalnim dejavnikom (hrup) (sedemnajsta posebna direktiva v smislu člena 16(1) Direktive 89/391/EGS)
Annex 2.4: Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise) (Seventeenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Priloga 2.5: Direktiva 2004/40/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtevah v zvezi z izpostavljenostjo delavcev tveganjem, ki nastajajo zaradi fizikalnih dejavnikov (elektromagnetnih sevanj) (osemnajsta posebna direktiva v smislu člena 16(1) Direktive 89/391/EGS)
Annex 2.5: Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Priloga 2.6: Direktiva 2006/25/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2006 o minimalnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtevah v zvezi z izpostavljenostjo delavcev tveganjem, ki nastanejo zaradi fizikalnih dejavnikov (umetnih optičnih sevanj) (devetnajsta posebna direktiva v smislu člena 16(1) Direktive 89/391/EGS)
Annex 2.6: Directive 2006/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (artificial optical radiation) (19th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Priloga 5.4: Uredba (ES) št. 1177/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. junija 2003 o statistiki Skupnosti o dohodku in življenjskih pogojih (EU-SILC)
Annex 5.4: Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC).
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve je 23. januarja 2008 za pripravljavca mnenja imenoval svojega predsednika Jana Anderssona.
On 23 January 2008, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs appointed the undersigned, its chairman, as draftsman of the opinion.
V skladu s sklepom konference predsednikov z dne 12. decembra 2007 ter sklepom konference predsednikov odborov z dne 15. januarja 2008 je 31. januarja 2008 potekal usklajevalni sestanek odborov, ki jih tematika zadeva.
In accordance with the decisions of the Conference of Presidents of 12 December 2007 and the Conference of Committee Chairmen of 15 January 2008, a coordination meeting of the committees concerned took place on 31 January 2008.
Na sestanku se je večina odborov strinjala, da mnenja pripravijo v obliki pisma.
In the course of that meeting, most of the committees agreed to deliver their respective opinions in the form of a letter.