natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Po poročanju združenja "Lietuvos Sajūdis" naj bi se med sestankom politične skupine EKR 7. septembra 2009 v Evropskem parlamentu Valdemar Tomaševski Joséju Manuelu Barrosu, predsedniku Evropske komisije, pritožil nad položajem Poljakov v Litvi.
According to Lietuvos Sajūdis , at an ECR Group meeting in the European Parliament on 7 September 2009, Valdemar Tomaševski complained about the situation of Poles in Lithuania to José Manuel Barroso, President of the Commission.
Poleg tega naj bi se pred uradnim obiskom predsednika Evropskega parlamenta Jerzyja Buzeka v Litvi z drugimi poslanci Evropskega parlamenta poljske narodnosti nanj obrnil s prošnjo, naj pozove, da se zaščitijo domnevno kršene pravice manjšine poljske narodnosti.
Together with other Polish Members of the European Parliament, he also allegedly spoke to Jerzy Buzek, President of the European Parliament, prior to the latter’s official visit to Lithuania, raising the issue of the protection of the rights of the Polish minority, which he claims are being infringed.
Ta sklep, objavljen na spletni strani
This decision, published on the internet site of the Lithuanian Chief Official Ethics Commission,
www.vtek.lt glavne komisije za uradno etiko Republike Litve, je dokončen in zoper njega ni možna pritožba.
www.vtek.lt , is final and not subject to appeal.
Pravna podlaga tega sklepa je naslednja:
The legal bases for the decision are:
· člen 17, točka 4 zakona o glavni komisiji za uradno etiko (N.X-1777),
· Article 17(4) of Law No X-1777 establishing the Chief Official Ethics Commission;
· členi 6(2), 9(1)(2) in 9(3) kodeksa ravnanja političnih predstavnikov Republike Litve (N.X-816).
· Articles 6(2), 9(1)(2) and 9(3) of Law No X-816 laying down the Code of Conduct for State Politicians.
OBRAZLOŽITEV PREDLAGANE ODLOČITVE
JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSED DECISION
Glavna komisija za uradno etiko Republike Litve je s svojim sklepom Valdemarja Tomaševskega „javno opozorila“ na podlagi kodeksa ravnanja za politične predstavnike države, ki je bil uveden z litvanskim zakonom z 19. septembra 2006 (N.X-816), zaradi izjav tega evropskega poslanca v okviru njegove poslanske dejavnosti.
The decision of the Lithuanian Chief Official Ethics Commission publicly admonished Valdemar Tomaševski on the basis of the Code of Conduct established by Lithuanian Law No X-816 of 19 September 2006, for opinions expressed by the Member of the European Parliament in the course of his parliamentary activities.
Glede na to, da omenjena komisija ni sodišče in ker ni mogoče razumeti, da zoper Valdemarja Tomaševskega teče sodni postopek v smislu člena 8 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije, pri teh dogodkih ne gre za primer poslanske imunitete.
Given that the Chief Official Ethics Commission is not a court of law, and that Mr Tomaševski is therefore not facing legal proceedings within the meaning of Article 8 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, this case does not concern parliamentary immunity.
Vendar statut poslancev v členu 2 določa, da „Poslanci so svobodni in neodvisni“.
However, Article 2 of the Statute for Members provides that ‘Members shall be free and independent’.
Člen 3 določa tudi, da: „1.
Furthermore, Article 3 states that ‘1.
Poslanci glasujejo posamezno in osebno.
Members shall vote on an individual and personal basis.
Dogovori o načinu izvrševanja mandata so nični.“
Agreements concerning the way in which the mandate is to be exercised shall be null and void.’
Torej je naloga Evropske komisije kot varuhinje pogodb in edinega organa, pooblaščenega, da začne postopek zaradi kršitve, da zoper Republiko Litvo začne tak postopek na podlagi člena 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The Commission, as guardian of the Treaties and sole body competent to initiate infringement proceedings, should therefore initiate such proceedings against the Republic of Lithuania under Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča torej, da se pozove Evropsko komisijo, naj pri litvanskih oblasteh posreduje, da doseže spoštovanje prava Evropske unije, in naj po potrebi začne postopek zaradi kršitve prava Unije, ki ga določa člen 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The Committee on Legal Affairs therefore recommends that the Commission should intervene with the Lithuanian authorities in order to enforce European Union law and, if necessary, initiate Union law infringement proceedings under Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da se pozove Evropsko komisijo , naj pri litvanskih oblasteh posreduje, da doseže spoštovanje prava Evropske unije, in naj po potrebi začne postopek zaradi kršitve prava Unije, ki ga določa člen 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
In view of the above , the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends calling on the Commission to intervene with Lithuanian authorities in order to enforce European Union law and, if necessary, initiate Union law infringement proceedings under Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
o boljši pripravi zakonodaje –15. letno poročilo Evropske komisije o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti v skladu s členom 9 Protokola
on better lawmaking – 15th annual report from the Commission pursuant to Article 9 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve ........................................................................15
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ................................14
Boljša priprava zakonodaje –15. letno poročilo Evropske komisije o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti v skladu s členom 9 Protokola
on better lawmaking – 15th annual report from the Commission pursuant to Article 9 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality
– ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega skupnega pristopa k oceni učinkov iz novembra 2005,
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment of November 2005,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo za naslednje zakonodajno obdobje
– having regard to its resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission for the next legislative term
Sprejeta besedila s tega dne, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0009 ,
Texts adopted of that date, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0009 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. oktobra 2008 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2006 v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti (14. letno poročilo)
– having regard to its resolution of 21 October 2008 on ‘Better lawmaking 2006’ pursuant to Article 9 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality (14th annual report)
Sprejeta besedila s tega dne, P6_TA(2008)0493 . ,
Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2008)0493 . ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucij o 24. in 25. letnem poročilu Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti
– having regard to its resolutions on the 24th and 25th annual reports from the Commission on monitoring the application of Community law
Sprejeta besedila s tega dne, P6_TA(2008)0494 in P6_TA-PROV(2009)0335 . ,
Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2008)0494 and P6_TA-PROV(2009)0335 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti (Petnajsto poročilo o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, 2007) ( KOM(2008)0586 ),
– having regard to the Commission report on subsidiarity and proportionality (15 th report on Better Lawmaking, 2007) ( COM(2008)0586 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti (Šestnajsto poročilo o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, 2008) ( KOM(2009)0504 ),
– having regard to the Commission report on subsidiarity and proportionality (16 th report on Better Lawmaking, 2008) ( COM(2009)0504 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije „Tretji strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji“ ( KOM(2009)0015 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission entitled ‘Third Strategic Review of Better Regulation in the European Union’ ( COM(2009)0015 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije "Zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji – Poročilo o napredku 2008 in napovedi za leto 2009" ( KOM(2009)0016 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document entitled ‘Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union’ – 2008 progress report and 2009 outlook’ ( COM(2009)0016 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije „Tretje poročilo o napredku strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja“ ( KOM(2009)0017 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document entitled ‘Third progress report on the strategy for simplifying the regulatory environment’ ( COM(2009)0017 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Akcijski program za zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev v EU – načrti za zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev za posamezna področja in ukrepi za leto 2009” ( KOM(2009)0544 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission entitled ‘Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU – Sectoral Reduction Plans and 2009 Actions’ ( COM(2009)0544 ),
– ob upoštevanju notranjih smernic Evropske komisije o izvajanju ocen učinka ( SEC(2009)0092 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Impact Assessment Guidelines ( SEC(2009)0092 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila sveta o ocenah učinka iz leta 2008 ( SEC(2009)0055 ),
– having regard to the Impact Assessment Board Report for 2008 ( SEC(2009)0055 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila sveta o ocenah učinka iz leta 2009 ( SEC(2010)1728 ),
– having regard to the Impact Assessment Board Report for 2009 ( SEC(2010)1728 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila skupine neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani na visoki ravni za upravne obremenitve z dne 17. septembra 2009,
– having regard to the report of 17 September 2009 of the High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za konkurenčnost z dne 4. decembra 2009,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Competitiveness Council of 4 December 2009,
– ob upoštevanju zaključnega poročila delovne skupine za parlamentarno reformo 2007–2009,
– having regard to the final report of the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform 2007-2009,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Konference predsednikov odborov „Ocena učinka: izkušnje Evropskega parlamenta”,
– having regard to the Conference of Committee Chairs working document entitled ‘Impact Assessment: The European Parliament’s Experience’,
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije o uredbi o državljanski pobudi ( KOM(2010)0119 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal for a regulation on the citizens' initiative ( COM(2010)0119 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 48 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 48 of the Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A7-00215/2010 ),
– having regard to the report by the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A7‑0215/2010 ),
A. ker je pravilna uporaba načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti potrebna za pravilno delovanje Evropske unije in ustrezno prilagoditev dejavnosti njenih institucij pričakovanjem državljanov, podjetij na skupnem trgu ter nacionalnih in lokalnih uprav; ker je treba zagotoviti, da se odločitve sprejemajo v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani,
A. whereas correct application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality is essential for the proper functioning of the European Union and for its institutions’ activities to meet the expectations of its citizens, companies operating in the internal market and national and local government, and to ensure that decisions are taken as closely as possible to the citizen,
B. ker je boljša priprava zakonodaje postala nujen pogoj za učinkovito delovanje Evropske unije in lahko bistveno prispeva k premagovanju gospodarske krize in k rasti gospodarstva,
B. whereas better lawmaking has become a prerequisite for the effective functioning of the European Union and can play an important role in ending the economic crisis and achieving economic growth,
C. ker je treba problematiko boljše priprave zakonodaje obravnavati ne le v okviru programa Komisije, ki je namenjen izboljšanju predpisov, ampak tudi pod širšim zornim kotom, povezanim z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe,
C. whereas the issue of better lawmaking should be considered not only in the context of the Commission programme on better regulation, but also in a wider sense, in connection with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty,
D. ker je z Lizbonsko pogodbo Parlament postal enakovreden Svetu v procesu sprejemanja zakonodaje po rednem zakonodajnem postopku,
D. whereas the Lisbon Treaty places Parliament on an equal footing with the Council in lawmaking under the ordinary legislative procedure,
E. ker Lizbonska pogodba predvideva formalno vključitev nacionalnih parlamentov v nadzor nad uporabo načela subsidiarnosti,
E. whereas the Lisbon Treaty provides for the formal involvement of national parliaments in monitoring the application of the principle of subsidiarity,
F. ker je bila boljša priprava zakonodaje prednostna naloga prejšnje Komisije in bi morala biti tudi osnovno načelo sedanje,
F. whereas better lawmaking was a matter of priority for the previous Commission and should also be a task of primary importance for the new Commission,
G. ker zajema izboljšanje predpisov v Uniji vrsto elementov, kot so na primer ocena učinka, zmanjšanje upravnih bremen ter poenostavitev in kodifikacija obstoječe zakonodaje,
G. whereas better regulation in the Union covers a range of matters, such as carrying out impact assessments, reducing administrative burdens and simplifying and codifying existing legislation,
H. ker je bistvenega pomena, da se pri pripravi zakonodajnih aktov (vključno z ocenami učinka) opravijo posvetovanja z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti s socialnimi partnerji,
H. whereas consultations with all interested parties, in particular social partners, are of fundamental importance in the preparation of draft legislation (including impact assessments),
I. ker člen 225 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) dovoljuje Parlamentu, da od Komisije zahteva predložitev ustreznih predlogov glede vprašanj, o katerih meni, da je za izvajanje pogodb treba sprejeti akt Unije,
I. whereas, under Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Parliament may request the Commission to submit any appropriate proposal on matters on which it considers that a Union act is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties,
J. ker je cilj programa za zmanjšanje upravnih bremen, izhajajočih iz zakonodaje Evropske unije, ki se izvaja od leta 2005, zmanjšati bremena za 25 % do leta 2012,
J. whereas a programme aimed at reducing the administrative burdens arising from European Union legislation has been in place since 2005 and seeks to reduce those burdens by 25% by 2012,
K. ker je eden od ključnih delov tega programa referenčna meritev upravnih stroškov, ki temelji na tako imenovanem modelu standardnih stroškov,
K. whereas one of the key elements of the programme is the baseline measurement of administrative costs based on a standard cost model,
L. ker tehnike prenovitve in kodifikacije, namenjene poenostavitvi in kodifikaciji veljavne zakonodaje, omogočajo boljšo razumljivost in večjo skladnost sprememb, ki se izvajajo,
L. whereas the use of recasting and codification to simplify and codify existing legislation ensures greater clarity and consistency as regards the changes made,
M. ker je bistvenega pomena, da države članice pravilno in pravočasno izvajajo direktive Evropske unije, in ker se pri izvajanju še vedno pojavljajo odvečni predpisi (po ang. „goldplating“), ki uvajajo bremena, ki presegajo zahteve evropske zakonodaje,
M. whereas correct and timely implementation by Member States is of crucial importance as regards European Union directives, as is the ongoing problem of the ‘gold-plating’ of legislation, i.e. the inclusion of obligations going beyond the requirements of European law,
N. ker je Lizbonska pogodba nadomestila sistem izvedbenih ukrepov (komitologije) z novo razdelitvijo na delegirane in izvedbene akte,
N. whereas the Lisbon Treaty has replaced the comitology system by a new distinction between delegated and implementing acts,
O. ker je bila z Lizbonsko pogodbo uvedena evropska državljanska pobuda, ki je eden od novih instrumentov, ki državljanom omogoča vplivanje na zakonodajo, oblikovano v Evropski uniji,
O. whereas the Lisbon Treaty has introduced a European citizens’ initiative, which is a new instrument allowing citizens to influence European Union law,
P. ker Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih človekovih pravicah med državljanskimi pravicami navaja pravico do dobre uprave, ki lahko deluje le, če temelji na pregledni zakonodaji, ki je državljanom razumljiva,
P. whereas the citizens’ rights set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union include the right to good administration, which cannot be achieved without clear laws that the general public can understand,
Glavne ugotovitve
Basic c omments
3. poudarja, da morajo vsi osnutki zakonodajnih predpisov vključevati razloge, iz katerih je možno sklepati, da bi bili za dosego cilja boljši ukrepi EU, in biti utemeljeni s kakovostnimi in po možnosti s količinskimi kazalniki v skladu z omenjenim protokolom;
Stresses that all draft legislation must include reasons for concluding that the objective can be better achieved by EU action, substantiated by qualitative and, wherever possible, quantitative indicators, in accordance with the above-mentioned protocol;
7. je seznanjen z udeležbo Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij v razpravi o izboljšanju zakonodajnega okolja in zmanjšanju upravnih bremen ter pričakuje plodno sodelovanje na tem področju;
Notes the participation of the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions in discussions on better regulation and the reduction of administrative burdens, and hopes to see fruitful cooperation in this area;
9. vztraja, da mora Komisija v skladu s političnim dogovorom na podlagi resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu med Parlamentom in Komisijo storiti vse, da bosta Parlament in Svet enakovredno obravnavana v zakonodajnemu procesu in bo tako izvajano temeljno načelo enake obravnave Parlamenta in Sveta, kot ga določa Lizbonska pogodba, še posebno z istočasnim in obsežnim obveščanjem obeh institucij o vseh dogodkih, ki vplivajo na zakonodajni postopek, in o njegovem napredku ter z zagotovitvijo enakovrednega dostopa obeh do sej in posredovanja prispevkov ali drugih informacij;
Urges the Commission, on the basis of the political agreement embodied in the resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission, to make every effort to ensure that Parliament and the Council are treated as equals in the lawmaking process, thus implementing the principle of equal treatment between Parliament and the Council deriving from the Lisbon Treaty, in particular by simultaneously and comprehensively notifying both institutions of all events and developments affecting that process and ensuring equal access to meetings and to proposals or other information;
18. zlasti poudarja potrebo po ustrezni analizi družbenih učinkov zakonodajnih predlogov, med drugim njihovih posledic za evropski trg dela in življenjski standard; spet poudarja, da je treba natančno preučiti učinek zakonodaje na podjetja;
Stresses, in particular, the need to examine the social effects of legislative proposals, including their impact on the European labour market and living standards; underlines once again the necessity to examine carefully the impact of legislation on businesses;
21. meni, da so nepristranske ocene učinka izjemno pomembno orodje za ocenjevanje predlogov Komisije, in se zato zavzema, da bi izvajanje ocene učinka preverjal zunanji, neodvisni organ, ki pa bi moral biti odgovoren Parlamentu;
Believes that objective impact assessments are an extremely important tool for assessing Commission proposals and calls, therefore, for scrutiny of the conduct of impact assessments by an independent body, which should, however, be accountable to Parliament;
23. pozdravlja nove smernice Komisije za ocene učinka, zlasti vključitev vprašanj, ki zadevajo načelo subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti; pričakuje, da bodo nove smernice bistveno prispevale k optimizaciji izvajanja ocen učinka in s tem k izboljšanju zakonodajnih predlogov;
Welcomes the Commission’s new guidelines on carrying out impact assessments and, in particular, the inclusion therein of a set of questions concerning the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; hopes that the new guidelines will lead to a significant improvement in the carrying-out of impact assessments and a subsequent improvement in the quality of legislative proposals;
26. poziva Komisijo, naj sistematično izvaja naknadno vrednotenje sprejete zakonodaje, da bo lahko, v skladu z možnostmi, med drugim preverila točnost ustreznih ocen učinka;
Calls on the Commission systematically to carry out ex-post assessments of adopted legislation in order, among other things, to verify insofar as possible the accuracy of the relevant impact assessments;
Zmanjševanje upravnih bremen
Reducing administrative burdens
29. pozdravlja rezultate dosedanjega dela Komisije v obliki priprave predlogov, ki po njihovem sprejetju omogočajo zmanjšanje upravnih bremen za celo 33 % do leta 2012, kar presega predhodno zavezo k zmanjšanju za 25 %; ugotavlja, da bi tako lahko dosegli prihranke, večje od 40 milijard EUR
Welcomes the results of the Commission’s work to date in drafting proposals which, once adopted, will enable administrative burdens to be reduced by as much as 33% by 2012, an improvement on the earlier commitment to a 25% reduction; notes that savings generated in this way could amount to more than EUR 40 billion
31. ugotavlja, da se je referenčni program za izračun upravnih bremen izkazal za koristno, vendar drago metodo; spodbuja Komisijo, naj upošteva nadomestne metode za izračun upravnih bremen, kot so na primer posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi, kar v konkretnih primerih omogoča hitro odpravo bremen;
Notes that the baseline programme for the measurement of administrative burdens has proved to be a useful but costly method; encourages the Commission to consider alternative methods of measuring administrative burdens, such as consultation with interested parties, which would allow the prompt removal of burdens in specific cases;
34. se strinja s Komisijo, da so elektronska sredstva komunikacije odličen instrument za zmanjševanje upravnih bremen, in jo spodbuja, naj uresniči smernice sporočila „e-Komisija 2006–2010“ in „Strategije i2010“, ki stremijo k posodobitvi evropske uprave;
Shares the Commission’s opinion that electronic communication constitutes an excellent tool for reducing administrative burdens and encourages it to realise the ideas set out in the e-Commission 2006-2010 framework and the i2010 strategy aimed at modernising administration in Europe;
37. opozarja, da državljani niso sposobni razlikovati med upravnimi bremeni, ki izhajajo iz evropske zakonodaje, in tistimi, ki jih nalaga nacionalna zakonodaja, ter da nacionalna upravna bremena prispevajo k negativni podobi Evropske unije;
Points out that citizens are not able to distinguish between administrative burdens resulting from European law and those imposed by national law and that national administrative burdens play a part in creating a negative image of the European Union;