natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Po tej novi določbi je „jedrska varnost”, torej predmet direktive, opredeljena s sklicevanjem na „varstvo delavcev, prebivalstva ter zraka, vode in prsti pred nepotrebnimi nevarnostmi sevanja iz jedrskih objektov”.
Under this new provision, "nuclear safety", namely the object of the Directive, is defined by reference to the “protection of workers, general public and the air, water and soil from undue radiation hazards arising from nuclear installations”.
Toda varstvo okolja ni zajeto v člen 31 Pogodbe Euratom.
Yet the protection of the environment is not covered by Article 31 EURATOM.
Zrak, voda in zemlja so omenjeni v členih 37 in 38 te pogodbe, vendar te določbe ne predstavljajo nikakršne pravne podlage za sprejetje zakonodajnih ukrepov, ampak omogočajo le zbiranje podatkov in sprejemanje priporočil.
Air, water and soil are referred to in Articles 37 and 38 EURATOM but those provisions provide no legal basis whatsoever for adopting legislative measures, just for data collection and recommendations.
Nasprotno, se navaja, je varstvo okolja po členu 175 Pogodbe o ES v (deljeni) pristojnosti Evropske skupnosti in je treba to določbo zato uporabiti kot dodatno pravo podlago.
Instead, it is argued, environmental protection is a (shared) competence of the European Community under Article 175 EC and hence that provision should be used as an additional legal basis.
Za razliko od člena 31 Pogodbe Euratom, ki zagotavlja zgolj posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom, je v členu 175 Pogodbe ES določeno njegovo soodločanje.
Unlike Article 31 EURATOM, which provides for mere consultation of the European Parliament, Article 175 EC requires codecision.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da predlog (za razliko od prejšnjih dveh predlogov) ne zahteva več rednega poročanja Evropskemu parlamentu o uporabi direktive ter jedrski varnosti v ES.
It is observed in this connection that the proposal no longer requires regular reporting to the European Parliament on the status of the application of the Directive and nuclear safety in the EC (unlike the previous two proposals).
Poudarja se, da so se direktive, ki so (tudi) urejale jedrske objekte, nekoč že opirale na Pogodbo o ES; najbolj znan primer je direktiva Sveta 85/337/EGS o oceni vplivov določenih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje.
It is pointed out that directives which (also) regulated nuclear installations have already been based on the EC Treaty, the most prominent example being Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment.
Ta se je opirala izključno na Pogodbo o ES, bolj natančno na določbo o varstvu okolja.
This was exclusively based on the EC Treaty, and more particularly the provision on environmental protection.
Navaja se, da bi bilo treba kot alternativo in v skrajnem primeru uporabiti kot privzeto pravno podlago člen 203 Pogodbe Euratom (izključno ali kot drugo pravno podlago), zato da se zajamejo zgoraj navedeni tehnološki in okoljski vidiki.
It is argued that, in the alternative and as a last resort, the default legal basis of Article 203 EURATOM should be used (either exclusively or as a second legal basis) to cover the technological and environmental aspects adverted to above.
Komisija meni, da je treba sistem za zaščito pred sevanjem, določen na osnovi obstoječih temeljnih varnostnih standardov, nadalje dopolniti, kljub temu da zagotavlja visoko raven varstva zdravja prebivalstva, saj je le tako mogoče zagotoviti vzdrževanje, razvoj in stalno izboljševanje visoke ravni varstva jedrskih objektov.
The Commission considers that although the system of radiation protection established by the existing basic safety standards ensures a high level of protection for the health of the population, it should be further supplemented to ensure that a high level of safety of nuclear installations is maintained, developed and continuously improved.
Zato je zdaj predložila ta zakonodajni predlog v skladu s členoma 31 in 32 Pogodbe Euratom.
For this reason it is now submitting the present legislative proposal, under Articles 31 and 32 EURATOM.
Zato je po našem mnenju ugotovitev pravne službe, da sta člena 31 in 32 Pogodbe Euratom primerna kot pravna podlaga in se ni potrebno sklicevati na člen 203 Pogodbe Euratom, glede na podrobno razčlenitev cilja in vsebine predlagane direktive, pravilna.
It is therefore considered, in the light of a detailed analysis of the aim and content of the proposed directive, that the Legal Service’s analysis that Articles 31 and 32 EURATOM constitute an appropriate legal basis and that there is no need to have recourse to Article 203 EURATOM is correct.
To stališče se z uvedbo priloge o varnostnih načelih ne spremeni, saj priloga ne spreminja predmeta predlaganega instrumenta.
This position is not altered by the introduction of an annex containing safety principles, since it does not alter the object of the proposed instrument.
Stališče bi se spremenilo, če bi Skupnost na osnovi načela 8 izdelala specifično zakonodajo, namenjeno denimo zaščiti ekosistemov v človekovem okolju pred škodljivimi vplivi zaradi izpostavljenosti sevanju, in bi bil člen 175(1) Pogodbe o ES potem nedvomno primeren kot pravna podlaga.
However, the position would be altered were the Community to develop principle 8 in specific legislation relating, say, to the protection of ecosystems in the human environment against harmful effects of radiation exposure, when there would be little doubt that the proper legal basis would be Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty.
Če bo dokončno potrjeno, da Komisiji pred predložitvijo novega predloga dejansko ni uspelo pridobiti novega mnenja o osnovnih standardih od skupine oseb, ki jih je določil znanstveni in tehnični odbor, potem to po mnenju pravne službe šteje za kršitev ene temeljnih zahtev v postopku, kar je v skladu s členom 230 (drugi pododstavek) razlog za revizijo tako sprejetega akta.
The Legal Service finds that, if it is definitely confirmed, the Commission’s apparent failure to obtain a new opinion on the basic standards from a group of persons appointed by the Scientific and Technical Committee before presenting its new proposal would constitute an infringement of an essential procedural requirement which, pursuant to Article 230 (second subparagraph) EC, constitutes a ground of review of the act thus adopted.
To stališče se zdi pravno osnovano.
This position seems to be correct in law.
Priporočamo, da pristojni odbor uredi to zadevo na zadovoljiv način z Evropsko komisijo.
It is recommended that the main committee clarify this matter to its full satisfaction with the Commission.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na svoji seji 31. marca 2009 ob upoštevanju, da Komisiji pred predložitvijo novega predloga očitno ni uspelo pridobiti novega mnenja o osnovnih standardih od skupine oseb, ki jih je določil znanstveni in tehnični odbor, kar šteje za kršitev ene temeljnih zahtev v postopku, kar je v skladu s členom 230 (drugi pododstavek) razlog za revizijo tako sprejetega akta, s 13 glasovi za, 6 glasovi proti in brez vzdržanih glasov
At its meeting of 31 March 2009, while noting that the Commission’s apparent failure to obtain a new opinion on the basic standards from a group of persons appointed by the Scientific and Technical Committee before presenting its new proposal would constitute an infringement of an essential procedural requirement which, pursuant to Article 230 (second subparagraph) EC, constitutes a ground of review of the act thus adopted, the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, by 13 votes in favour, 6 votes against and no abstentions
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Rainer Wieland (podpredsednik), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (podpredsednica), Francesco Enrico Speroni (podpredsednik), Monica Frassoni (poročevalka), Carlo Casini, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine, Neena Gill, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Véronique Mathieu, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Hartmut Nassauer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Eva-Riitta Siitonen, Jacques Toubon, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka. sklenil, da kot primerno pravno podlago priporoči člena 31 in 32 Pogodbe Euratom.
The following were present for the final vote: Giuseppe Gargani (Chair), Rainer Wieland (Vice-Chair), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (Vice-Chair), Francesco Enrico Speroni (Vice-Chair), Monica Frassoni (rapporteur), Carlo Casini, Bert Doorn, Nicole Fontaine, Neena Gill, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Véronique Mathieu, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Hartmut Nassauer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Eva-Riitta Siitonen, Jacques Toubon, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka. , to recommend that the appropriate legal basis is Articles 31 and 32 of the EURATOM Treaty.
o predlogu direktive Sveta (Euratom) o vzpostavitvi okvira Skupnosti za jedrsko varnost
on the proposal for a Council directive setting up a Community framework for nuclear safety
Predlog Komisije je tretji poskus v zadnjih desetih letih, da bi se uvedla nova pravila o jedrski varnosti.
The Commission proposal is the third attempt within a decade to introduce new rules on nuclear safety.
V prvem predlogu novembra 2002 je bilo zapisano:
The first, in November 2002, stated that:
Za dosego (...) ciljev Skupnosti glede varstva pred sevanjem, je pomembno najprej določiti temeljne obveznosti in splošna načela varnosti jedrskih objektov (...).
“In order to attain the Community objectives regarding radioprotection (...), it is essential as a first stage to define the basic obligations and general principles on the safety of nuclear installations (...).
Ti bodo kasneje dopolnjeni z vzpostavitvijo skupnih standardov in nadzornih mehanizmov za zagotovitev visoke ravni varnosti (...).
This will at a later stage be complemented by the establishment of common standards and control mechanisms in order to guarantee a high level of safety (...)”.
Zdi pa se, da je to, kar se je leta 2002 zdelo bistveno, danes nepomembno.
However, what in 2002 was seen as essential now seems unimportant.
Iz pregledov iz leta 2003 je bila umaknjena zahteva za uvedbo osnovnih obveznosti in skupnih standardov, nadomestili so jo mehanizmi Skupnosti za zagotavljanje spoštovanja skupnih načel jedrske varnosti, vključno s programom Skupnosti za preverjanje.
In the 2003 revisions the requirement for introducing basic obligations and common standards was removed and replaced by Community mechanisms to ensure adherence to common nuclear safety principles, notably including a Community verification scheme.
Vendar je iz zadnjega predloga direktive ta mehanizem izvzet in preverjanja na ravni Skupnosti ne bo.
However, the latest proposal for a Directive has now excluded this mechanism and there will be no Community verification.
Namesto tega osnutek direktive zgolj uveljavlja zahteve iz Konvencije o jedrski varnosti Mednarodne agencije za atomsko energijo.
Instead the draft directive will only enforce the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Convention on Nuclear Safety (CNS).
V skladu s konvencijo je potrebna zgolj objava letnega poročila o stanju v jedrskem sektorju in strokovni pregled poročila s strani drugih podpisnic konvencije.
This requires only the publication of an annual report on the status of the nuclear sector and subjecting the report to peer review by other contracting parties of the Convention.
Vse države članice, ki upravljajo jedrske elektrarne so že podpisnice konvencije.
All Member States that operate nuclear power plants are already contracting parties to the Convention.
Komisija ne navaja primerov, ko država članica EU ne bi spoštovala konvencije.
The Commission supplies no examples of where an EU Member State has failed to comply with the Convention.
Glavna kritika sedanjega osnutka je, da predlaga zakonodajo zgolj zaradi sprejemanja zakonodaje, ne prinaša pa nobenih dodatnih varnostnih zahtev.
The main criticism of the current draft is that it is proposing legislation only for the sake of legislating, and that it will bring no additional safety requirements.
To je bilo tudi stališče odbora Komisije za presojo vpliva, ki je dvakrat izrazil pomisleke o pomanjkljivi dodani vrednosti direktive.
This view was even raised by the Commission’s Impact Assessment Board, which twice voiced concerns over the lack of added value of the directive.
Zaskrbljenost glede standardov in praks jedrske varnosti, ki se izvajajo v EU, je resnična in utemeljena.
There are real and justified concerns over nuclear safety standards and practices being deployed in the EU.
Splošen trend je, da se meje varnosti v jedrskih objektih nižajo, kadar se ti bližajo koncu življenjske dobe.
As a general trend the safety margins of nuclear facilities decrease as they approach the end of their design lives.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno, se za veliko število sedaj delujočih obratov v EU njihova prvotno predvidena življenjska doba izteče pred 2030.
As noted ‘a large number of currently operating plants in the EU will come to the end of their originally foreseen lifetimes before 2030’.
Namesto, da se z osnutkom direktive uvaja mehanizem izvajanja, ki bo imel za obstoječo mednarodno konvencijo vprašljivo vrednost, je treba v njem ponuditi mehanizem za oblikovanje in uvedbo skupnih varnostnih standardov, ki zahtevajo najnovejšo oziroma najboljšo razpoložljivo tehnologijo, praks ter regulativnih ureditev, ki naj se uvedejo v vse delujoče jedrske objekte v EU.
Rather than introduce an enforcement mechanism of questionable value for an existing international convention the draft directive must propose a mechanism which will introduce and enforce common safety standards that require state of the art or best available technology, practices and regulatory regimes are introduced to all nuclear facilities in operation in the EU.
Zgolj takrat bodo državljani EU lahko prepričani, da je bilo storjeno vse, kar je mogoče, da bi se zmanjšalo tveganje za jedrske nesreče.
Only then can EU citizens be confident that all that can be done is done, in order to reduce the risk of nuclear accidents.
Direktiva ne bi smela biti sprejeta, če se to ne doseže.
Unless this is achieved the directive should not be adopted.
(12a) Za dosego ciljev Skupnosti glede jedrske varnosti iz člena 1(1) je treba najprej določiti osnovne obveznosti in splošna načela varnosti jedrskih objektov v tej okvirni direktivi.
(12a) In order to attain the Community objectives regarding nuclear safety mentioned in Article 1(1), it is essential as a first stage to define the basic obligations and general principles on the safety of nuclear installations in this framework Directive.
Pozneje jih je treba dopolniti s sprejetjem skupnih standardov in nadzornih mehanizmov, razvitih v Združenju zahodnoevropskih upravnih organov za jedrsko varnost v tesnem sodelovanju z evropsko skupino na visoki ravni za
This should at a later stage be complemented by the adoption of common standards and control mechanisms, to be developed by the Western European Nuclear Regulators' Association (WENRA) and in close collaboration with the European High Level Group on
jedrsko varnost in ravnanje z odpadki ob posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom, da se zagotovi najvišja raven varnosti, ki upošteva najnovejši tehnološki razvoj in se lahko opredeli kot najvišja možna raven varnosti.
Nuclear Safety and Waste Management in consultation with the European Parliament, in order to guarantee the highest level of safety, which takes into account the latest technological developments and which can be defined as ‘state of the art’.
Z namenom doseči najvišjo raven varnosti jedrskih objektov ta direktiva določa osnovne obveznosti in splošna načela, na podlagi katerih bodo ob pregledu te okvirne direktive v dveh letih po začetku njene veljavnosti sprejeti skupni varnostni standardi.
In order to achieve the highest level of safety of nuclear installations, this framework Directive aims at setting out basic obligations and general principles, on the basis of which common safety standards will be adopted upon review of this Directive within two years from its entry into force.
Namen te direktive je doseganje, vzdrževanje in stalno izboljševanje jedrske varnosti v Skupnosti ter izboljšanje vloge nacionalnih upravnih organov z določitvijo osnovnih obveznosti in splošnih načel za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varnosti jedrskih objektov ter oblikovanjem potrebnega okvira za sprejetje skupnih varnostnih standardov .
This Directive aims at achieving, maintaining and continuously improving nuclear safety in the Community and to enhance the role of the national regulatory bodies by setting out the basic obligations and general principles guaranteeing a high level of safety of nuclear installations, and creating the necessary framework for the adoption of common safety standards .
Uporablja se za načrtovanje, izbiro lokacije, gradnjo, vzdrževanje, delovanje in razgradnjo jedrskih objektov, za katere zakonodajni in regulativni okvir zadevnih držav članic , zakonodaja EU ter Konvencija o jedrski varnosti zahtevajo upoštevanje varnosti.
It shall apply to the design, siting, construction, maintenance, operation and decommissioning of nuclear installations, for which consideration of safety is required under the legislative and regulatory framework of the Member State concerned , EU law and the Convention on Nuclear Safety .
Učinkovita varnost se lahko doseže z usklajenimi zavezujočimi ukrepi in varnostnimi standardi.
The effective safety can be achieved through harmonized binding measures and safety standards.
Varnostne ukrepe in kontrole, ki jih je treba izvajati v jedrskem objektu, na podlagi standardov EU in mednarodnih standardov ter najboljše razpoložljive tehnologije določi upravni organ, izvaja pa jih imetnik dovoljenja.
The safety measures and controls to be implemented in a nuclear installation shall be decided on the basis of EU and international standards and the best available technology by the regulatory body and applied by the licence holder.
Učinkovita varnost se lahko doseže z usklajenimi zavezujočimi ukrepi in varnostnimi standardi, vsaka država članica pa mora uporabiti najboljšo razpoložljivo tehnologijo.
The effective safety can be achieved through harmonized binding measures and safety standards and the best available technology should be applied by each Member State.
Države članice vzpostavijo in vzdržujejo zakonodajni in regulativni okvir , ki temelji na najboljših razpoložljivih praksah EU in mednarodnih praksah, za upravljanje varnosti jedrskih objektov.
Member States shall establish and maintain a legislative and regulatory framework , based on EU and international best available practices, to govern the safety of nuclear installations.
Da bi dosegli resnično varnost v celotni Evropi, je treba uskladiti zahteve in ukrepe za izpolnjevanje teh zahtev, hkrati pa mora vsaka država članica uporabiti najboljše razpoložljive prakse.
In order to achieve real safety in the whole Europe, the requirements and measures for their obeying have to be harmonized and BAP should be applied by every Member State.
Države članice zagotovijo, da je upravni organ resnično neodvisen od vseh organizacij, katerih naloga je spodbujati, upravljati jedrske objekte ali utemeljevati družbene koristi, ter ne sme biti pod nobenim vplivom, zaradi katerega bi bila lahko ogrožena varnost.
Member States shall ensure that the regulatory body is effectively independent of all organisations whose task is to promote, operate nuclear installations or justify societal benefits and free from any influence that may affect the safety.
Države članice zagotovijo, da je upravni organ resnično neodvisen od vseh organizacij, katerih naloga je spodbujati, načrtovati, graditi, upravljati jedrske objekte ali bogatiti gorivo, skladiščiti izrabljeno gorivo ali uporabljati postopek ponovne predelave ali utemeljevati družbene koristi, ter ne sme biti pod nobenim vplivom, zaradi katerega bi bila lahko ogrožena varnost.
Member States shall ensure that the regulatory body is effectively independent of all organisations whose task is to promote, design, construct , operate nuclear installations or deal with fuel enrichment, spent fuel storage or reprocessing ; or justify societal benefits and free from any influence that may affect the safety.
Zagotoviti je treba vse predpogoje za neodvisno odločanje.
All prerequisites for an independent decision should be ensured.
Upravni organ in nacionalni regulativni sistem sta vsaj vsakih pet let predmet mednarodnega strokovnega pregleda, katerega cilj je stalno izboljševanje regulativne infrastrukture.
At least every five years the regulatory body shall submit itself and the national regulatory system to an international peer review aimed at continuously improving the regulatory infrastructure.
Jedrska tehnologija se hitro razvija, zato je, kar zadeva zagotavljanje jedrske varnosti, obdobje 10 let predolgo.
Nuclear technology develops fast and 10 years is too long a period in terms of ensuring nuclear safety.
Zlasti zagotovijo, da se izvajajo vsa veljavna načela, določena v varnostnih temeljih IAEA, da se zagotovi visoka raven varnosti jedrskih objektov, vključno z, med drugim, učinkovitimi ureditvami proti možnim radiološkim nevarnostim, preprečevanjem nesreč in odzivom nanje, obvladovanjem staranja, dolgoročnim ravnanjem z vsemi proizvedenimi radioaktivnimi snovmi ter obveščanjem prebivalstva in organov sosednjih in drugih, potencialno ogroženih držav.
They shall in particular ensure that the applicable principles laid down in the IAEA safety fundamentals are implemented to ensure a high level of safety in nuclear installations, including inter alia effective arrangements against potential radiological hazards, accident prevention and response, ageing management, long term management of all produced radioactive materials and information of the population and the authorities of neighbouring and other potentially endangered States.
Države, ki jih doseže radioaktivni oblak ali vodni tok kot posledica nesreče pri uporabi tehnologije, so lahko bolj ogrožene kot sosednje države (kar je odvisno od vremenskih razmer).
States that happen to be in the range of radioactive cloud or water stream resulting from a technological hazard may be more endangered (depending on meteorological conditions), than neighbouring countries.
Kar zadeva varnost novih jedrskih reaktorjev, si države članice prizadevajo za razvoj dodatnih varnostnih zahtev v skladu s stalnim izboljševanjem varnosti na podlagi varnostnih ravni, razvitih v Združenju zahodnoevropskih upravnih organov za jedrsko varnost in v tesnem sodelovanju z evropsko skupino na visoki ravni za jedrsko varnost in ravnanje z odpadki.
As regards the safety of new nuclear power reactors Member States shall aim to develop additional safety requirements, in line with the continuous improvement of safety on the basis of the safety levels developed by the Western European Nuclear Regulators' Association (WENRA) and in close collaboration with the European High Level Group on Nuclear Safety and Waste Management.
Kar zadeva varnost delujočih in novih jedrskih reaktorjev ter jedrskih reaktorjev s podaljšano življenjsko dobo , si države članice prizadevajo za razvoj dodatnih varnostnih zahtev v skladu s stalnim izboljševanjem varnosti na podlagi varnostnih ravni, razvitih v Združenju zahodnoevropskih upravnih organov za jedrsko varnost in v tesnem sodelovanju z evropsko skupino na visoki ravni za jedrsko varnost in ravnanje z odpadki.
As regards the safety of working, life-extended and new nuclear power reactors Member States shall aim to develop additional safety requirements, in line with the continuous improvement of safety on the basis of the safety levels developed by the Western European Nuclear Regulators' Association (WENRA) and in close collaboration with the European High Level Group on Nuclear Safety and Waste Management.
Varnostni ukrepi bi morali biti obvezni ne le za nove jedrske elektrarne, temveč predvsem za obstoječe jedrske elektrarne in tiste s podaljšano življenjsko dobo, saj te običajno delujejo s starejšo tehnologijo.
Safety measures should be compulsory not only for new nuclear power plants but foremost for existing and life extended plants, since they normally operate with older technology.