natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
O. ker mora reforma kohezijske politike okrepiti to politiko, tako da na osnovi potreb in ciljev Evropske unije v smislu trajnostnega razvoja izboljša primerljivost, usklajenost in sinergijo evropskih politik, ne da bi se katera od njih podrejala drugi,
O. whereas the reform of cohesion policy needs to enhance that policy through better correlation and better coordination and synergy among European policies, without subordinating any one policy to another, on the basis of the Union’s needs and objectives in terms of sustainable development,
P. ker se vključenost lokalnih in regionalnih udeležencev v kohezijsko politiko odraža v njihovih regionalnih in lokalnih strategijah za napredek gospodarskega razvoja in socialne vključenosti,
P. whereas the involvement of local and regional actors in cohesion policy is reflected in their regional and local strategies to advance economic development and social inclusion,
Q. ker gospodarsko konkurenčnost regij, ki zaostajajo v razvoju svojih zmogljivosti, podpira razvoj raznovrstne infrastrukture, ki omogoča dostop do izobraževanja, raziskav in inovacij,
Q. whereas the economic competitiveness of regions that are lagging behind is being bolstered by the development of their capacities , including the development of infrastructure of all types, enabling access to education, research and innovation,
R. ker nekateri elementi teh instrumentov, denimo isti časovni okvir in usklajenost z lizbonsko strategijo, sicer omogočajo sinergijo, vendar so še vedno razlike, denimo različne pravne podlage, vsebinska oziroma območna usmerjenost in deljeno oziroma centralizirano upravljanje,
R . whereas, while some elements of the architecture of these instruments, such as a common time frame and alignment with the Lisbon agenda, allow for synergies, there remain differences, such as different legal bases, thematic versus territorial focus, and shared versus centralised management,
3. poudarja, da je s povečanjem koncentracije sredstev kohezijske politike mogoče zagotoviti, da ta politika pomembno prispeva h krepitvi konkurenčnosti, inovacij in zaposlovanja v EU;
Stresses that enhancing the concentration of cohesion - policy resources can ensure that this policy makes a significant contribution to fostering competitiveness, innovation and employment in the EU;
5. poudarja, da je gospodarska konkurenčnost regij EU tesno povezana z ustrezno stopnjo zaposlenosti, izobraženo in usposobljeno delovno silo, socialno varnostjo ter dostopom do javnih storitev; v zvezi s tem podpora socialni koheziji v okviru kohezijske politike povečuje pomen te politike za splošno regionalno konkurenčnost na svetovni ravni;
Underlines the fact that the economic competitiveness of the EU regions is closely linked to the existence of adequate level s of employment, educated and ski lled wor k force s , social security and access to public services; notes, in this regard , that the support for social cohesion provided by the cohesion policy increases the importance of this policy in terms of overall regional competitiveness on a global scale;
Teritorialna kohezija – razmislek o vplivu politik EU na lokalno raven
Territorial cohesion – a reflec tion of the local - l evel impact of EU policies
10. meni, da imajo zlasti obmejna ozemlja težave, s katerimi se Evropska unija srečuje pri odpiranju mej, dokončni uvedbi enotnega trga in globalizaciji; poudarja, da so ta ozemlja lahko manj konkurenčna zaradi davčne in socialne konkurence, zapletenih upravnih postopkov in ter medregionalnih meddržavnih selitvenih tokov; poudarja, da je pomembno razviti čezmejno sodelovanje in upravljanje na več ravneh, ter poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja izmenjavo informacij in najboljše prakse;
Takes the view that border territories , in particular , highlight the problems that the EU faces in connection with the challenges of opening up borders, completing the internal market and globalisation; emphasises that the competitiveness of such territories may be undermined by the need to cope with competing fiscal and welfare systems, complex administrative arrangements and migratory flows between regions and states; stresses the importance of developing the tools needed for cross-border cooperation and multi-level governance and calls on the Commission to encourage exchanges of information and best practice;
12. poudarja, da načelo upravljanja na več ravneh prenaša odgovornost za programe, kar omogoča boljši izkoristek zmogljivosti za ozemeljsko sodelovanje, in da bi zato Evropska unija z usklajenimi in k rezultatom usmerjenimi ukrepi ter z določanjem regionalnih in lokalnih prednostnih nalog lahko sledila skupnim ciljem;
Stresses that multi - level governance entails the devolution of responsibilit y for program me s, allowing for better exploitation of the potential of territorial cooperation , and that, therefore, in order for the Union to be able to pursue common objectives , using coherent and result - oriented measures while establishing specific regional and local priorities, the principles of multi-level governance should be implemented;
Večanje vpliva kohezijske politike za povečanje gospodarske konkurenčnosti
Maximiz ing the impact of cohesion policy to increase economic competitiveness
15. opozarja, da je temeljno načelo dobrega upravljanja kohezijske politike sofinanciranje; poziva, naj se ga kljub omejevanju javnih sredstev zaradi gospodarske krize ohrani;
Points out that co-financing is a principle fundamental to the sound management of cohesion policy; calls for its continued application despite the restrictions on public spending which the economic crisis has brought about;
19. poudarja, da je treba zavoljo odprave razlik tudi v prihodnje zagotavljati podporo predvsem projektom, namenjenim regijam, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, da se bo ohranil pričakovani učinek v tem programskem obdobju in bo v skladu s prvotnimi ocenami; izboljšanje dostopnosti in infrastrukture bo prispevalo h konkurenčnosti regij, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, na notranjem trgu, s tem pa tudi k zunanji konkurenčnosti EU kot celote; meni, da bi se z ukinitvijo te podpore zmanjšal učinek pozitivnih začetnih rezultatov;
Stresses the importance, in the interests of eliminating disparities , of continuing to provide support primarily for projects aimed at regions that are lagging behind, so that the impact expected in this programming period can be maintained and will be in line with initial estimates; notes that improving accessibility and infrastructural facilities will help to make those regions which lag behind in the internal market more competitive , and will thus contribute to the external competitiveness of the EU as a whole; takes the view that withdrawing this support would reduce the impact of the positive initial results;
21. meni, da mora BDP ostati glavno merilo za določanje, ali je pomoč iz kohezijske politike potrebna regiji, lahko pa se dodajo drugi merljivi kazalniki, če se izkažejo za pomembne, kar bi nacionalnim organom omogočilo, da na ustrezni ravni odločanja zaprosijo za upoštevanje drugih kazalnikov, s katerimi se lahko upoštevajo posebne značilnosti regij in mest;
Takes the view that GDP must remain the principal criterion for determining the eligibility of regions for cohesion- policy assistance , while other measurable indicators might be added if proven to be relevant, leaving room for national authorities to apply, at the appropriate level of decision making, other indicators which take into account the specific attributes of regions and cities;
23. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči načine, na katere lahko nove tehnike finančnega inženiringa izboljšajo učinkovitost in vpliv kohezijske politike, da bi se dosegli najboljši možni rezultati pri izbranih projektih;
Invites the Commission to study ways in which new techniques in financial engineering can improve the effectiveness and impact of the cohesion policy , with a view to obtaining the best possible results in the projects chosen;
Kohezijska politika kot najpomembnejša politika za obdobje po letu 2013
Cohesion policy as a key policy for the post ‑ 2 013 period
27. poudarja, da je treba ohraniti prehodne ureditve za utrditev in izboljšanje sedanje stopnje razvoja, ki bi se lahko znižala, če bi se po izpolnitvi zastavljenega cilja zmanjšalo financiranje; poudarja, da bi se s tem zagotovilo enako obravnavanje regij, ki so v enakem položaju, kar bi omogočilo učinkovito organizacijo programov;
Stresses the need to keep transitional arrangements in place to consolidate and improve the current level of development, which could fall if financing is significantly reduced once a given objective is met; points out that this would ensure equal treatment for regions in similar situation s , which would in turn lead to the efficient organisation of programmes;
31. meni, da je treba del sredstev, dodeljenih za raziskave, razvoj in inovacije v okviru kohezijske politike, nameniti za doseganje in ohranjanje vodilne svetovne vloge v sektorjih, kjer Evropa že ima konkurenčno prednost ter v sektorjih, kjer ima priložnost postati vodilna svetovna sila;
Takes the view that some of the funding allocated to research, development and innovation under the cohesion policy should be used to attain and maintain the role of world leader in sectors where Europe already has a competitive advantage and in those where it has a fresh opportunity to become a world leader;
34. meni, da mora kohezijska politika še naprej spodbujati ukrepe, ki bodo ustvarili čim večje število delovnih mest, s čimer bo mogoče uporabiti lokalne človeške vire in zagotoviti njihov stalni razvoj, da bi se zagotovila visoka storilnost;
Takes the view that the cohesion policy should continue promoting measures that will generate the greatest possible number of jobs, making it possible to harness local human resources and ensure their ongoing development so as to guarantee high productivity;
Glavni razlog za javno podporo procesu evropske integracije je boljša kakovost življenja z varnimi in bolj kakovostnimi delovnimi mesti in zagotavljanjem dostopa do vseh vrst infrastrukture, najsibo prometna, socialna ali izobraževalna najsibo povezana z raziskavami, razvojem in inovacijami.
An improved quality of life through the creation of secure and better‑quality jobs and ensuring access to infrastructure of all types – be this transport, social or educational or relating to research, development and innovation – has been the main reason for the public supporting the process of European integration.
Kohezijska politika lahko s svojimi specifičnimi cilji in instrumenti zagotovi skladen razvoj Evropske unije in tako zadovolji ekonomske in socialne potrebe evropske javnosti.
Cohesion policy can ensure the cohesive development of the EU through its specific objectives and instruments, hence satisfying the economic and social needs of the European public.
Hkrati se države članice EU, vključno s tistimi v vzhodni in jugovzhodni Evropi, neposredno soočajo z učinki globalizacije.
At the same time, the EU Member States, including those of eastern and south‑east Europe, are being directly confronted with the effects of globalisation.
Kako posamezna država članica izkorišča možnosti, ki izhajajo iz pripadnosti enotnemu evropskemu trgu, je odvisno od njene zrelosti in s stopnje razvoje, ki se od države do države razlikujeta.
The manner in which each Member State harnesses the opportunities provided by belonging to the single European market depends on its maturity and level of development, which differ from one country to the next.
Iz tega sledi, da je vsaka država članica odgovorna za določitev najbolj učinkovitih ukrepov, ki bodo njenemu gospodarstvu omogočili, da deluje v tem globalnem sistemu.
It follows that each Member State is responsible for pinpointing the most effective measures for enabling its economy to function within this global system.
Namen tega poročila z naslovom Doseganje dejanske ozemeljske, socialne in gospodarske kohezije v EU – nujen pogoj za globalno konkurenčnost? je spodbuditi med poslanci v Evropskem parlamentu razpravo o medsebojni odvisnosti in dopolnilni naravi ukrepov, ki se sprejemajo na evropski in nacionalni ravni, da bi se uresničili cilji politik EU, kamor spada tudi povečanje svetovne gospodarske konkurenčnosti.
This report, entitled Achieving real territorial, social and economic cohesion within the EU – a sine qua non for global competitiveness? is intended to spur debate among the Members of the European Parliament on the interdependence and complementary nature of the measures adopted at European and national level to fulfil the objectives of EU policies, including that of increasing global economic competitiveness.
Poročilo si prizadeva zagotoviti okvir, v katerem je poudarjeno, da ima kohezijska politika povezovalno vlogo in prispeva h krepitvi konkurenčnosti EU v svetu.
The report seeks to provide a framework highlighting the integrating role of cohesion policy and the contribution it makes to increasing the EU’s global competitiveness.
Pristop poročevalca
Rapporteur’s approach
Zaradi izzivov, s katerimi se soočajo, najsibo glede podnebnih sprememb, staranja prebivalstva, socialne migracije ali energije ali izzivov, ki so posledica gospodarske in finančne krize, katere učinek se kaže na lokalni ravni, so regije v svetovnem in evropskem kontekstu stopile v ospredje.
The global and European context has pushed the regions to the fore owing to the challenges that confront them, be these in the field of climate change, ageing of the population, social migration or energy, or the challenges arising from the economic and financial crisis, whose impact is being felt at local level.
Poročevalec meni, da je kohezijska politika najpomembnejša politika EU, ki lahko regijam omogoči, da se bodo čim bolje spopadle s temi izzivi in tako prispevale k svetovni gospodarski konkurenčnosti EU, tako da bodo:
Your rapporteur takes the view that cohesion policy is the EU’s key policy for enabling the regions to face these challenges as best as possible and hence to help increase the EU’s global economic competitiveness, by:
– zagotavljale enak življenjski standard za vse državljane EU ter
- ensuring common living standards for all EU citizens; and
– podpirale razvoj s izkoriščanjem lokalnih in regionalnih posebnosti, pri tem pa ustvarile dodano vrednosti in gospodarsko produktivnost.
- supporting development by harnessing local and regional specificities, thereby generating added value and economic productivity.
Kohezijska politika je veliko prispevala k uresničevanju ciljev iz lizbonske strategije, vendar poročevalec meni, da so za utrditev ustvarjenih rezultatov in njihovega pričakovanega učinka potrebne nadaljnje naložbe v vse vrste infrastrukture, kot osnove za povečanje gospodarske konkurenčnosti.
Cohesion policy has made a major contribution to meeting the Lisbon Strategy objectives, but to consolidate the results obtained and their expected impact, your rapporteur considers that continued investment needs to be made in infrastructure of all types, as a basis for increasing economic competitiveness.
Infrastruktura – bistveni dejavnik za povečanje svetovne konkurenčnosti
Infrastructur e – a fundamental factor in increasing global competitiveness
Infrastruktura je eden glavnih stebrov, ki se mednarodno ocenjujejo, da bi se določila gospodarska konkurenčnost; z njo je mogoče odpraviti učinke oddaljenosti in zagotovitev mobilnosti naložb in delovne sile.
Infrastructure is one of the main pillars assessed internationally to ascertain levels of economic competitiveness; it makes it possible to cancel out the effect of distances and ensure the mobility of investment and of the workforce.
Cilj za leto 2020, da EU postane konkurenčno, povezano in zeleno gospodarstvo, se lahko doseže s posodabljanjem in medsebojnim povezovanjem infrastrukture ter podpiranjem naložbenih načrtov in razvojnih projektov, ki so usklajeni s posebnimi značilnostmi posamezne regije.
The EU 2020 objective of a competitive, connected and greener economy can be achieved by modernising and interconnecting infrastructure and supporting investment plans and development projects that are in tune with the specific characteristics of each region.
Z uporabo inovativnih metod in instrumentov je mogoče ta pristop uspešno izvajati.
That approach can be viably implemented by using innovative methods and instruments.
Poročevalec meni, da je teritorialna kohezija nujna, ker se na teritorialni ravni vidi:
Your rapporteur considers it essential to achieve territorial cohesion, since it is at a territorial level that one can see the extent to which:
– koliko so se pri načrtovanju procesa regionalnega razvoja upoštevale potrebe in posebne zmogljivosti nekega območja,
- programming of the regional development process was in keeping with the needs and specific potential of an area;
– ali imajo vključeni partnerji na voljo dovolj institucionalnih zmogljivosti, da bi lahko zagotovili najboljšo možno absorpcijo finančnih sredstev EU,
- the partners involved enjoy sufficient institutional capacities to ensure the best possible rate of absorption of EU funding;
– ali je podpora EU dolgoročna in se opira na rezultate, dobljene z izvajanjem projektov, ki jih EU financira, ter ali zagotavlja trajnost.
- the support provided by the EU is long‑term support that builds on the results obtained through the implementation of EU‑funded projects and ensures sustainability.
Zaradi razlik med ravnmi decentralizacije in večplastnimi sistemi upravljanja prihaja do situacij, ki so najbolj očitne na lokalni in regionalni ravni, zato sta prav zagotavljanje, da so javno financirani ukrepi na evropski ali nacionalni ravni dopolnilne narave, in preprečevanje dvojnega financiranja izziva, ki ju je treba obravnavati na lokalni ravni.
Disparities in levels of decentralisation and multi‑layered systems of government create situations that are most clearly visible at local and regional level, and ensuring that measures funded publicly – at European or national level – are complementary while avoiding any overlapping of financing are genuine challenges that need to be addressed at local level.
Treba je zagotoviti horizontalno in vertikalno uskladitev različnih ravni upravljanja ter področij dejavnosti in vrst posegov.
There is a need to ensure horizontal and vertical coordination between different levels of government, and between fields of activity and types of intervention.
Zagotovitev enotnih razvojnih standardov, doseženih z ekonomsko, socialno in teritorialno kohezijo, zlasti v mejnih regijah, terja:
Ensuring common standards in the development achieved via economic, social and territorial cohesion, particularly in border regions, calls for:
– kakovostno načrtovanje na osnovi vključevanja udeležencev z vseh zadevnih ravni in iz vseh zadevnih sektorjev,
- high‑quality programming based on involvement of the stakeholders from all the relevant levels and sectors;
– uporabo ustreznih in enotnih statističnih podatkov in kazalnikov na stopnji načrtovanja in izvajanja,
- utilisation of relevant and uniform statistics and indicators at both the programming and implementation stages;
– izvajanje sistema nadzora, naravnanega posebej na določanje in analizo cele vrste kazalnikov in učinkov;
- implementation of a monitoring system specifically scaled to enable a whole range of indicators and impacts to be observed and analysed;
– širjenje rezultatov ocen na vse ravni upravljanja in regionalne sektorje dejavnosti.
- dissemination of the results of evaluations to all levels of government and regional sectors of activity.
Glede na to, da so strukturni skladi in kohezijski sklad glavni finančni instrumenti, ki podpirajo uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev, določenih na regionalni ravni, bi bilo zaželeno povečati dodano vrednost, ki jo ustvarjajo s:
In view of the fact that the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund are the main financial instruments in support of achieving the development objectives set at regional level, it would be desirable to maximise the added value they generate by:
– podpiranjem prizadevanj lokalnih in regionalnih organov, da bi razvili upravne zmogljivosti, saj dokazano obstaja potreba po strokovnem znanju o načrtovanja in njegovi kakovosti.
- bolstering the efforts made by the local and regional authorities to develop administrative capacity, as there is a proven need for planning expertise and quality.
Države članice in Komisija morajo zagotavljati kakovostno tehnično podporo in postopek izvajanja ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije na lokalni in regionalni ravni se mora okrepiti,
The Member States and the Commission must guarantee quality technical assistance and the process of implementing economic, social and territorial cohesion must be enhanced at local and regional level;
– poenostavitvijo postopkov dodeljevanja strukturnih in kohezijskih sredstev,
- simplifying the procedures for the allocation of structural and cohesion funding;
– razvojem okvira, potrebnega za javno-zasebna partnerstva, da bi postal vzdržna in uresničljiva možnost za regije.
- developing the framework needed for public-private partnerships to be a viable and realistic option for regions.
V mnogih državah članicah, kjer sicer menijo, da so javno-zasebna partnerstva ena od drugačnih možnosti, ni dovolj jasnega pravnega okvira in znanja na regionalni ravni, ki bi omogočal tak pristop.
There are many Member States in which, despite public-private partnerships being considered an alternative, there is no sufficiently clear legal framework and know‑how at the regional level to enable such an approach.
Evropska investicijska banka bi morala na primer zagotoviti organom tehnično podporo, ki jo potrebujejo za oblikovanje takih partnerstev.
It is necessary, for example, for the EIB to provide the requisite technical assistance to the authorities so that they can form such partnerships.
Upoštevati je treba vse točke, da bodo lahko regije v naslednjem programskem obdobju v splošnem okviru ciljev EU 2020 same prispevale k trajnostnemu razvoju in zagotavljale, da se izpolnjujejo skupni življenjski standardi.
All the points have to be taken into consideration, so that in the next programming period, under the overarching framework of the EU 2020 objectives, the regions can make their own contributions to sustainable development and ensure that common living standards are met.
Po letu 2013 mora postati kohezijska politika nosilna politika, kar se tiče njene odločilne vloge pri zmanjševanju razlik v razvoju med evropskimi regijami.
After 2013, cohesion policy has to become a mainstay policy, in view of its decisive role in reducing the disparities in development between European regions.
Res je, da bi lahko nastop gospodarske in finančne krize izzval nekatere spremembe, vendar bo mogoče z zrelostjo in prožnostjo zadovoljiti različne potrebe regij.
It is true that the onset of the economic and financial crisis may trigger certain changes, but with maturity and flexibility it will be possible to satisfy the very differing needs of the regions.
To je eden od razlogov, zakaj poročevalec meni, da je potreben tristranski sporazum/zaveza med Komisijo, državami članicami in regijami, ki bo natančno določal(-a) vlogo vsake pri poskusu uresničevanja ciljev, ki so bili določeni.
This is one reason why your rapporteur considers that a tripartite agreement/commitment is needed between the Commission, Member States and the regions which clearly sets out the roles each is to play in seeking to achieve the objectives set.
Podpori raziskavam, razvoju in inovacijam ter omogočanju izobrazbe in sposobnosti, ki so potrebne za zagotovitev vključujočega trga dela, bodo sledile politike in ukrepi na regionalni ravni.
Support for research, development and innovation, and the development of education and the skills needed to ensure an inclusive job market will be followed up by regional‑level policies and measures.
Z zagotavljanjem enotne ravni razvoja in dostopa do osnovne infrastrukture in kakovostnih storitev se poveča možnost za obvladovanje večjih izzivov.
Ensuring a common level of development and access to basic infrastructure and quality services increases the ability to withstand major challenges.
Svetovno gospodarsko konkurenčnost podpira ta zmožnost odziva na globalizacijo.
Global economic competitiveness is bolstered by this ability to respond to globalisation.