natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalec zato predlaga, da se tabela „Vitamini in minerali, ki se lahko navedejo, ter njihovi priporočeni dnevni vnosi (PDV)“, ki jo predlaga Komisija, nadomesti s tisto iz Direktive 2008/100, da bi se upoštevala veljavna zakonodaja.
The rapporteur is thus suggesting that the table headed 'Vitamins and minerals which may be declared and their recommended daily allowances (RDAs)' proposed by the Commission should be replaced by that in Directive 2008/100/EC, for the sake of consistency in the legislation in force.
Vrednosti priporočenih dnevnih vnosov je treba prilagoditi novim referenčnim vrednostim v skladu s spremembami v Direktivi 2008/100/ES o označevanju hranilne vrednosti živil (UL L 285, str.
The RDA values should be brought into line with the new reference values in accordance with the modification of the Nutrition Labelling Directive, 2008/100/EC (OJ L 285, p.
Priloga XI – del A – odstavek 2
Annex XI – part A – paragraph 2
Pri določitvi znatne količine je praviloma treba upoštevati 15 % priporočenega vnosa, navedenega v točki 1, na 100 g ali 100 ml ali na paket, če ta vsebuje en sam obrok.
As a rule, 15 % of the recommended allowance specified in point 1 supplied by 100 g or 100 ml or per package if the package contains only a single portion should be taken into consideration in deciding what constitutes a significant amount.
Pri določitvi znatne količine je praviloma treba upoštevati
As a rule,
– 15 % PDV na 100 g ali porcijo za trdna živila; ali
- 15 % of RDA per 100g or serving for solids ; or
– 7,5 % PDV na 100 ml ali porcijo za tekočine; ali
- 7,5 % of RDA per 100ml or serving for liquids ; or
– 5 % PDV na 100 kcal (12 % PDV 1 MJ); ali
- 5 % of RDA per 100kcal (12 % of RDA 1 MJ) ; or
– količino, določeno na podlagi odstopanj v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 1925/2006 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o dodajanju vitaminov, mineralov in nekaterih drugih snovi živilom; ali
- an amount provided for by derogations granted in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods ; or
– na paket, če ta vsebuje en sam obrok.
- per package if the package contains only a single portion should be taken into consideration in deciding what constitutes a significant amount.
Sedanji predlog za znatno količino v višini 15 % PDV na 100 g ali 100 ml je obvezna raven, ki izključuje obveznost navedbe določenih vitaminov in mineralov na oznaki večine osnovnih živil, na primer sadja, zelenjave, krompirja, kruha in mleka.
The current proposal for significant amount of 15% of the RDA per 100g or 100ml is an arbitrary level that excludes most of the basic foodstuffs like fruits, vegetables, potatoes, bread and milk from declaring certain vitamins and minerals on the label.
Osnovne skupine živil najbolj prispevajo k vnosu vitaminov in mineralov ter so priporočene v prehranskih smernicah v državah EU.
These basic food groups are a major contributor to the vitamin and mineral intake, and are recommended in dietary guidelines in EU countries.
Sedanji predlog daje prednost živilom, ki niso osnovna, z dodanimi vitamini in minerali pred osnovnimi živili, v katerih so vitamini in minerali naravno prisotni.
The current proposal favours non-basic food stuffs with added vitamins and minerals over basic food groups with naturally present vitamins and minerals.
Poleg tega gre predlog v škodo tekočim živilom t nizko vsebnostjo suhe snovi in nizko kaloričnostjo.
In addition, the proposal penalises liquid foods with a low content of dry matter and a low energy density.
Zlasti to velja za pijače, kot so konzumno mleko in tekoči mlečni proizvodi.
This is especially the case for beverages such as consumption milk and liquid milk products.
Ta predlog spremembe bo določbe uskladil z zbirko standardov za živila (Codex Alimentarius).
Finally, this amendment will bring the provisions in line with the Codex Alimentarius.
Priloga XI – del B – naslov
Annex XI – part B – Title
Priporočeni vnosi energije in izbranih hranilnih snovi razen vitaminov in mineralov (odrasli)
Reference intakes for energy and selected nutrients other than vitamins and minerals (adults)
Priporočeni dnevni vnosi energije in izbranih hranilnih snovi razen vitaminov in mineralov (odrasli)¹
Reference daily intakes for energy and selected nutrients other than vitamins and minerals (adults) 1
1 Priporočeni vnosi energije so okvirni, natančneje pa jih mora določiti Evropska agencija za varnost hrane.
1 The reference intakes are indicative values; they will be laid down more precisely by the European Food Safety Authority.
Priporočeni vnosi energije so okvirni, natančneje pa jih mora določiti Evropska agencija za varnost hrane.
The reference intakes are indicative values; they will be laid down more precisely by the European Food Safety Authority.
Priloga XI – del B – tabela – vrstica 1
Annex XI – part B – table – row 1
8400 kJ ( 2000 kcal )
8400 kJ (2000 kcal)
Navedene morajo biti tudi beljakovine kot življenjsko pomembne hranilne snovi, ki prispevajo k vnosu energije.
Given that it constitutes an essential nutrient, which also contributes to energy intake, protein must also be indicated.
Posebna navedba sladkorjev ni potrebna, saj so ogljikovi hidrati navedeni skupaj.
A separate indication for sugars is not relevant, as total carbohydrates are indicated.
Energijska vrednost se navaja samo v kilokalorijah, saj potrošnik ta podatek razume in uporablja.
The energy content should be indicated only in kilo-calories, as this is the information which consumers understand and may use.
Priloga XI – del B – tabela – vrstica 1 a (novo)
Annex XI – part B – table – row 1 a new
Priloga XII – tabela
Annex XII – table
ogljikovi hidrati (razen poliolov)
carbohydrate (except polyols)
6 kcal/g — .
6 kcal/g —.
organska kislina
organic acid
Izračun z dvema različnima enotama privede do nasprotujočih si rezultatov zaradi neskladnih faktorjev pretvorbe.
The calculation with two different units leads to contradictory results because of inconsistent conversion factors.
Ker potrošniki bolje razumejo mersko enoto „kcal“ kot pa „kJ“, je treba navedbo podati samo v „kcal“.
Since 'kcal' is a measurement unit more easily understood by consumers than the 'kJ' unit, the indication should be given solely in 'kcal'.
Priloga XIII – del C – tabela
Annex XIII – Part C – table
kJ in kcal
kJ and kcal
od tega
of which
vitamini in minerali
vitamins and minerals
enote, opredeljene v točki 1 dela A Priloge XI
the units specified in point 1 of Part A of Annex XI
druge snovi
other substances
enote, ki ustrezajo posameznim zadevnim snovem
units as appropriate for the individual substances concerned
Združitev delov A do C v priloge XIII.
Condensed version of Parts A to C in Annex XIII.
Potrošniki imajo pravico vedeti, kakšna je sestava njihovih živil.
Consumers have a right to know what their food contains.
Zaradi tega so informacije o sestavi in hranilni vrednosti živil nujno potrebne, saj jim omogočajo ozaveščeno odločitev za nakup.
For that reason, information on the composition and nutritional value of foods is essential, since only on that basis can consumers make selective purchasing decisions.
Pravo Skupnosti vsebuje sicer vrsto uredb in direktiv o sestavinah in označevanju živil, vendar do sedaj še ni obsežnejših obveznosti glede označevanja.
Although Community law contains a series of regulations and directives dealing with food ingredients and food labelling, as yet it lays down no comprehensive rules on compulsory labelling.
Poleg dejstva, da je množica splošnih in specifičnih pravnih predpisov Skupnosti glede informacij o živilih komaj pregledna ter pogostokrat povzroči pravno negotovost, vodijo dodatni predpisi na ravni držav članic do izkrivljanja konkurence in ovirajo trgovino na notranjem trgu Evropske unije.
Quite apart from the fact that the range of general and specific Community legal provisions on food information has now expanded so much as to become simply confusing, thus giving rise to legal uncertainty, additional national rules are creating distortions of competition and barriers to trade in the European Union's internal market.
Te nepravilnosti lahko odpravi samo usklajeno označevanje živil, ki bo enotno v vsej Evropski uniji.
Only uniform EU rules on food labelling can remedy these problems.
Stopnje postopka
Procedural stages
Komisija je konec januarja 2008 Parlamentu in Svetu predložila predlog za preoblikovanje pravil EU o označevanju živil.
In late January 2008 the Commission submitted to Parliament and the Council a proposal for a revision of the EU rules on food labelling.
Evropski parlament je konec avgusta 2008 imenoval poročevalko.
Towards the end of August 2008 the European Parliament appointed its rapporteur.
Njeno poročilo o predlogu Komisije je bilo v začetku decembra 2008 predstavljeno in obravnavano v pristojnem Odboru Evropskega parlamenta za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane (ENVI).
Her report on the Commission proposal was presented and debated in the committee responsible, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, at the beginning of December 2008.
Po izteku roka za vložitev predlogov sprememb je pristojni odbor sredi februarja 2009 ponovno obravnaval poročilo, in sicer je bilo vloženih skupno 1332 predlogov sprememb.
After the deadline for tabling amendments had expired, the committee responsible again considered the report in mid-February 2009, giving particular consideration to the fact that 1332 amendments had now been tabled.
Zaradi velikega števila predlogov sprememb in bližajočih se evropskih volitev je pristojni odbor 16. marca 2009 sklenil, da bo dokumentacijo v skladu s členom 185(5) Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta prenesel v novo zakonodajno obdobje.
Because so many amendments had been tabled and in view of the impending European elections, the committee responsible decided on 16 March 2009 to hold consideration of the proposal over until the next parliamentary term, pursuant to Rule 185(5) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament.
Poročevalka Parlamenta je s tem dobila nalogo, da predloži nov osnutek poročila, v katerem bo upoštevala čim več predlogov sprememb.
Your rapporteur was thus asked to submit a new draft report, taking into account as many as possible of the amendments tabled.
To poročilo je zdaj pred vami.
This new report is the one before you.
Za vložitev predlogov sprememb k temu osnutku bo določen nov rok.
A new deadline will be set for amendments to this draft.
Namen predloga Komisije za preoblikovanje pravil EU o označevanju živil je boljša pravna ureditev, kar pomeni poenostavitev obstoječega pravnega okvira za označevanje živil, združil in nadomestil pa naj bi sedem direktiv in eno uredbo.
The Commission proposal for the reformulation of the EU's provisions on food labelling is intended to meet the requirements of better law-making (in the case of the legal framework on food labelling) by combining and replacing seven directives and a regulation.
Poleg tega naj bi zmanjšal birokracijo, ustvaril večjo pravno varnost za udeležence živilske verige, povečal konkurenčnost evropske živilske industrije, zagotovil varnost hrane, potrošniku omogočil informacije o živilih ter spodbudil zdravo prehrano kot del strategije Evropske unije proti debelosti.
In addition, it is designed to reduce red tape, offer stakeholders in the food chain a greater degree of legal certainty, improve the competitiveness of the European food industry, guarantee food safety, ensure that consumers are provided with comprehensive information about foods and promote healthy eating as part of the European Union's strategy against obesity.
Osnutek uredbe vsebuje naslednje osrednje predloge:
The proposal for a regulation contains the following key proposals:
Obvezne navedbe
Mandatory particulars
Za označevanje živil predvideva osnutek Komisije vrsto novih obveznih navedb (člen 9).
The Commission proposal lays down a series of new mandatory particulars to be included on food labels (Article 9).
K tem med drugim spada razširjeno označevanje alergenov na nepredpakiranih živilih (člen 22) in natančna označba hranilne vrednosti.
It extends mandatory allergen labelling to non-prepacked foods (Article 22) and provides for a comprehensive nutrition declaration.
Komisija predlaga, da morajo biti vse obvezne navedbe navedene v najmanjši dovoljeni velikosti črk, ki znaša 3 mm.
The Commission proposes a minimum font size of 3 mm for all mandatory labelling elements.
Izjeme glede obveznega označevanja so predvidene za alkoholne pijače, to je za vino, pivo in žgane pijače.
In the case of alcoholic drinks, particularly wine, beer and spirits, the Commission proposes derogations from the labelling requirements.
Navedba in prikaz hranilnih vrednosti
Indication and presentation of nutritional values
V nadaljevanju predlaga Komisija, da se na glavnem vidnem polju embalaže natančno navede hranilna vrednost (členi od 29 do 34).
In addition, the Commission is proposing the introduction of a comprehensive nutrition declaration which is to be placed in the 'principal field of vision' of the packaging (Articles 29 to 34).
Obvezni podatki o energijski vrednosti živila in hranilnih snovi, kot so maščobe, nasičene maščobne kisline, ogljikovi hidrati, sladkor in sol (člen 29(1)), morajo biti navedeni v ustreznem vrstnem redu na prednji strani embalaže in so izraženi v količinah na 100 g ali 100 ml ali na obrok.
Mandatory particulars relating to the energy value of the food and the nutrients fat, saturates, carbohydrates, sugar and salt (Article 29(1)) must be given in the appropriate order on the front of the package, expressed per 100 g or 100 ml or per portion.
Ostale navedbe (člen 29(2)) se navedejo drugje na embalaži, vendar morajo biti navedene v obliki tabele hranilnih vrednosti (člen 34(2)).
Details of other particulars (Article 29(2)) may be given elsewhere on the packaging, but must at all events be set out in table format, in a 'nutrition box' (Article 34(2)).
Vse navedbe se nanašajo na 100g/100ml ali – v primeru hrane, pakirane v posamezne obroke – na obrok in so za posamezno hranilno snov izražene z deležem priporočenega dnevnega vnosa (člen 31).
All particulars must relate to standard amounts of 100 g/100 ml or – in the case of food packaged in portions – to a portion and must be expressed as a percentage of the recommended daily intake of the given nutrient (Article 31).
Nacionalni sistemi označevanja
National labelling systems
Osnutek predloga Komisije dopušča državam članicam široke zakonodajne možnosti.
The Commission proposal allows the Member States considerable scope to adopt national labelling rules.
V skladu s poglavjema VI in VII lahko države članice v posebnih primerih sprejmejo pravne predpise za posamezne kategorije živil in smejo poleg predpisane predstavitvene oblike razviti dodatne nacionalne sisteme označevanja (člen 44(3) in člen 34(5)).
Pursuant to Chapters VI and VII, in exceptional cases Member States would be able to adopt legal provisions governing specific categories of food and, in addition to the mandatory forms of expression, develop national labelling systems (Articles 44(3) and 34(5)).
Poleg tega je v pristojnosti držav članic, da za nepredpakirana živila, na primer pekovske in mesne izdelke ter za pripravo in dostavo hrane iz restavracij in velikih gostinskih obratov itd., sprejmejo nacionalne predpise glede prikaza navedb oziroma se odločijo, da ne bodo zahtevale navedbe določenih podatkov (člen 41) – z izjemo označevanja alergenov.
In addition, in the case of non-prepacked food, e.g. bakery and processed meat products, and food prepared in the context of mass catering in restaurants, large-scale kitchens, etc., Member States would be able to lay down national rules governing the manner in which particulars are to be shown or – with the exception of allergen labelling – decide not to require the provision of certain particulars (Article 41).
Pripombe poročevalke
Rapporteur’s remarks
Poročevalka na splošno pozdravlja predlog uredbe Komisije, saj je treba uvesti enotno označevanje živil v vsej Evropi.
In principle, your rapporteur welcomes the Commission's proposal for a regulation.
Takšna nova in obsežna uredba o označevanju živil lahko potrošnikom tudi pomaga, da se bodo pri nakupu odločali namensko ter svojo prehrano prilagodili svojim potrebam in željam.
A new, comprehensive food labelling regulation of this kind can also help consumers to make selective purchasing decisions and so tailor their own diets to their individual needs and wishes.
Glede na skupni notranji trg je izredno pomemben tudi vidik usklajevanja označevanja živil, saj dosedanji nacionalni dodatni predpisi in različni načini, kako države članice razlagajo zakonodajo Skupnosti o živilih, ovirajo trgovino ter konkurenco.
The harmonisation of food labelling is also of enormous relevance to the internal market, since at present additional national rules and differing Member State interpretations of existing Community food legislation are giving rise to barriers to trade and competition-related problems.
Odprava teh nepravilnosti lahko zniža stroške za proizvajalce in trgovce živil in navsezadnje tudi za potrošnike.
Remedying this state of affairs can serve to reduce costs for food producers and traders and thus, ultimately, for consumers as well.
Oblikovanje vseevropskega označevanja živil, ki ga predvideva predlog uredbe, po mnenju poročevalke ni primerno za zmanjšanje birokracije, ne bi poenostavilo zakonodaje in ne bi zagotovilo boljših informacij o živilih potrošnikom.
However, the EU labelling system outlined in the proposal for a regulation does not strike your rapporteur as one suited either to reducing red tape and simplifying legislation or to helping consumers obtain better food information.
Komisija jemlje nekatere točke preveč z lahkoto.
In some areas, the Commission has made it much too easy for itself.
Poleg tega kratko malo pozablja na posebne oblike trženja oziroma ponudb živil, kot so neposredno trženje kmetijskih proizvodov, oskrba s hrano pri prevozu potnikov, prostocarinska območja ali upravljanje z avtomati.
Moreover, special ways of marketing or delivering food, such as direct marketing by farmers, catering services to passengers in transit, duty-free sales or sales from vending machines, are simply forgotten.
Prav tako niso upoštevani posebni proizvodi, na primer jedilni zlati lističi ter živila – barvila in inovativna živila.
Special products, such as culinary gold leaf, and colouring and innovative foods, are likewise disregarded.
Nekatere zahteve predloga so neuresničljive in bi med drugim povzročile znatne stroške za proizvajalce in trgovce živil, tako da bi se morale zaradi novih pravil o označevanju povišati cene živil.
Some of the provisions contained in the proposal are unrealistic and would, in addition to creating other problems, generate substantial additional costs for food manufacturers and traders, so that food prices would have to be raised merely on account of new labelling regulations.
Te pomanjkljivosti v predlogu Komisije ogrožajo preživetje malih in srednje velikih podjetij v živilskem sektorju.
These shortcomings in the Commission proposal jeopardise the survival of many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the food industry.
Kar se tiče potrošnikov, lahko sklepamo, da bi predlagana velika količina in prikaz obveznih informacij prej povzročila zmedo kot pa prispevala k ozaveščenosti potrošnika.
As far as consumers are concerned, they would be more likely to find the proposed plethora of mandatory information, and the forms in which it is to be conveyed, confusing than enlightening.
Povsem nerazumljiv pa je namen, da se državam članicam priznajo lastne obsežne zakonodajne možnosti, kar bi dodatno razdrobilo notranji trg na področju živil, zadevni osnutek uredbe pa bi postal absurden.
What is more, the proposal to grant Member States considerable leeway to adopt their own rules seems completely incomprehensible: it would further fragment the internal market in the food sphere and render the proposal for a regulation under consideration here absurd.
Predlog Komisije je v nasprotju z njeno lastno namero, ki je navedena v obrazložitvi pod točko 5 in jo je na tem mestu vredno citirati: „Uporaba uredbe kot pravnega instrumenta podpira cilj poenostavitve, ker zagotavlja, da morajo vsi udeleženci hkrati upoštevati ista pravila.“
The Commission's proposal contradicts its own stated intention, as indicated in Point 5 in its Explanatory Memorandum, which is worth quoting here: 'The use of a Regulation as the legal instrument supports the objective of simplification because it guarantees that all actors have to follow at the same time the same rules.'
Med drugim ni jasno, do kdaj mora Komisija predložiti osnutek, saj se je šele avgusta 2008 začela do sedaj edina znanstvena raziskava, ki poteka v vseh državah članicah in preučuje, kako označevanje živil vpliva na potrošnikovo odločitev za nakup.
What is more, it is mystifying that the Commission should have chosen to submit its proposal now, since the very first EU-wide scientific study into the influence of food labelling on consumers' purchase decisions began only in August 2008.
Za zdaj lahko nova zakonodaja o označevanju upošteva kvečjemu predvidevanja in lastne izkušnje udeležencev, zaradi česar lahko osnutek Komisije operira zgolj z domnevami glede želja in potreb potrošnikov.
As things stand, therefore, the new food labelling legislation can at best draw on conjecture and the subjective experiences of the groups and individuals involved, so that the Commission proposal is likewise based only on assumptions concerning consumers' wishes and needs.
Nihče ne more oceniti, ali bo končna uredba dejansko ustrezala povprečnemu potrošniku v vsej EU, in ali je v nekaj letih ne bo treba bistveno spremeniti zaradi novih rezultatov raziskave.
No one can say whether the regulation which is ultimately adopted will in fact serve the interests of average consumers throughout the EU, or whether, on the basis of new research findings, it will have to be substantially revised in only a few years' time.
Omenjeno je še toliko bolj pomembno, ker lahko domnevamo, da bo imela nova ureditev znaten finančni vpliv na proizvajalce in trgovce z živili.
This point is particularly significant, because it is likely that the new rules will have a very considerable financial impact on food manufacturers and traders.
Vendar Komisija tudi v zvezi s tem nima nobenih podatkov; opozoriti pa je treba tudi na stališče, razvidno iz njenega osnutka, da posvetovanje z zunanjimi strokovnjaki ni bilo potrebno.
Yet the Commission, whose proposal contains the remarkable revelation that it saw no need to consult outside experts when drafting the text, is silent on this issue as well.
Najmanjša dovoljena velikost črk 3 mm v celotnem besedilu v praksi dejansko ni izvedljiva.
An across-the-board requirement that information must be printed with a font size of at least 3 mm is not workable.
To velja zlasti za izdelke z večjezičnimi oznakami, vendar ne samo zanje.
This applies in particular, but not exclusively, to products whose packaging carries information in several languages.
Obvezna velikost črk 3 mm bi pomenila večjo embalažo, dodatno odpadno embalažo in morebitne večje obroke.
A mandatory minimum font size of 3 mm would result in bulkier food packaging, more packaging waste and possibly even larger portions.
Poleg tega pa sama velikost črk ni odločilna za čitljivost.
What is more, legibility is not solely contingent on font size.
Poročevalka zato podaja opredelitev pojma „čitljivost“ informacij o živilih in predlaga, da se v okviru posvetovalnega postopka razvijejo smernice za izvajanje pravil glede čitljivosti.
For that reason, your rapporteur provides a definition of the concept of the 'legibility' of food information and proposes that a consultation process should take place with a view to developing guidelines for implementing the rules relating to legibility.
Komisija utemeljuje to, da je državam članicam priznala razvoj lastnih sistemov označevanja, z načelom subsidiarnosti.
The Commission justifies its proposal to allow Member States to develop their own labelling systems by invoking the subsidiarity principle.