natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog vsebuje tudi pomembne spremembe pravil o tem, katero pravo se uporabi v pogodbi o zaposlitvi.
The proposal also covers important changes in the rules of applicable law to the contract of employment.
Ta osnutek mnenja obravnava nedoslednosti in pravne tehnične elemente, ki se jih lahko razjasni in tako izboljša uredbo.
This draft opinion addresses inconsistencies and legal technical elements that can be clarified in order to improve the Regulation.
Splošna namera je izboljšanje pravne varnosti za pravo, ki se uporabi v pogodbi o zaposlitvi.
The overall ambition is to provide greater legal certainty for the law applicable to employment contracts.
(11) Kar zadeva individualno pogodbo o zaposlitvi, mora pravilo o izbiri prava omogočati opredelitev težišča delovnega razmerja ob upoštevanju več kot samo videza.
(11) Regarding individual employment contracts, the conflict rule should make it possible to identify the centre of gravity of the employment relationship, looking beyond appearances.
To pravilo ne posega v uporabo prisilnih določb države napotitve, predvideno v Direktivi 96/71/ES z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev.
This rule does not prejudge the application of the mandatory rules of the country to which a worker is posted in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.
Ta uredba ne posega v uporabo prisilnih določb države napotitve, predvideno v Direktivi 96/71/ES z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev.
This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of the mandatory rules of the country to which a worker is posted in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.
Odnos do Direktive 96/71/ES in njena omemba v uredbi morata biti jasna.
The relationship and reference to Directive 96/71/EC in the Regulation must be clear.
Pravilo, določeno v prvem stavku, ni edini element, zaradi katerega uredba ne bi smela posegati v direktivo o napotitvi delavcev.
The rule laid down in the first sentence is not the only element for which the regulation should be without prejudice to the Posting Directive.
Besedilo "prejudge" se zdi dvoumno in se nadomesti z "without prejudice", kar ne zadeva slovenske različice.
The wording "prejudge" also seem ambiguous and is changed to "without prejudice".
Ta predlog spremembe pojasnjuje Direktivo 96/71/ES in je z njo usklajen.
The amendment gives clarification and consistency in relation to Directive 96/71/EC.
(11a) Uredba 96/71ES z dne 16. decembra 1996 določa minimalna pravila, ki se uporabljajo za zaščito delavcev, napotenih na ozemlje države članice, ki ni država, v kateri običajno delajo, in državam članicam ne preprečuje, da določijo druge pogoje zaposlitve, navedene v splošno uporabnih kolektivnih sporazumih, niti da določijo druge pogoje zaposlitve, če so to določbe o javnem redu.
(11a) Directive 96/71/EC lays down minimum rules for the protection of workers applicable to posted workers on the territory of a Member State other than the State in which they normally work and does not prevent Member States from imposing other terms and conditions of employment laid down in collective agreements, nor from imposing other employment conditions where these are public policy provisions.
UL L 18, 21.1.1997, str.
OJ L 18, 21.1.97, p.
Ta nova uvodna izjava pojasnjuje posebno naravo pravil iz Direktive 96/71 ES, ki državam članicam ne preprečujejo sprejetja bolj zaščitnih ukrepov na nacionalni ravni z določanjem drugih pogojev zaposlitve v primeru določb o javnem redu.
This new recital clarifies the specific nature of the rules set out in Directive 96/71/EC which does not prevent Member States from adopting more protective measures at national level for instance by imposing other employment conditions in case of public policy provisions.
Ne zadeva slovenske različice.
This discrepancy is somewhat ambiguous.
Ne glede na določbe člena 4 se v primeru, da pogodbeni stranki v skladu s členom 3 ne izbereta prava, za individualno pogodbo o zaposlitvi uporablja:
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 4, an individual contract of employment shall, in the absence of choice in accordance with Article 3, be governed:
Besedilo "ne glede na določbe člena 4", ki se pojavlja v Konvenciji, je Komisija zbrisala.
The wording “notwithstanding the provisions of Article 4” appearing in the Convention has been deleted by the Commission.
Spet smo ga dodali zavoljo jasnosti in doslednosti.
This text is reintroduced due to clarity and consistency.
Če delavec začasno opravlja svoje delo v drugi državi, se to ne šteje za spremembo običajnega kraja opravljanja dela.
The place of performance shall not be deemed to have changed if he is temporarily employed in another country.
(a) pravo države, v kateri delavec v izpolnjevanju pogodbe običajno opravlja svoje delo.
(a) by the law of the country in which the employee habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract.
Vendar pa se za pogoje njegovega dela in plačila uporablja pravo države, v kateri začasno opravlja svoje delo.
However, his employment and pay conditions shall be subject to the law of the country in which he is temporarily employed.
Opravljanje dela v drugi državi velja za začasno, če se pričakuje, da bo delavec ponovno prevzel svoje delo v državi izvora, ko bo opravil svoje specifične naloge v tujini.
Work carried out in another country shall be regarded as temporary if the employee is expected to resume working in the country of origin after carrying out his specific tasks abroad.
Besedila "opravljanje dela v drugi državi velja za začasno, če se pričakuje, da bo delavec ponovno prevzel svoje delo v državi izvora, ko bo opravil svoje naloge v tujini" ni najti v Konvenciji.
The text "work carried out in another country shall be regarded as temporary if the employee is expected to resume working in the country of origin after carrying out his tasks abroad" did not appear in the Convention.
S tem besedilom tvegamo široko interpretacijo "nalog".
It carries a risk of a broad interpretation of "tasks".
Kaj pa, če je naloga delavca recimo predstavljati dejavnosti delodajalca s sedežem v državi članici X v državi članici Y?
What if the task of the worker is, e.g. to represent the employer established in Member State X for his activities in Member State Y?
Kdaj je takšna naloga "opravljena"?
When is such a task "carried out"?
Lahko bi šlo za zelo dolgo obdobje.
It could potentially be a very long period.
Vključitev besede "specifične" nakazuje, da gre začasne dejavnosti v drugi državi interpretirati ozko.
The inclusion of "specific" points out that the temporary activity in another country should be interpreted narrowly.
V Konvenciji se to besedilo ni pojavilo.
The text did not appear in the Convention.
V sporu med lokalnim delodajalcem in delojemalcem mora biti edini ustrezen kraj dela v državi napotitve.
In a conflict between the local employer and the employee the only relevant place of work must be in the country of posting.
Uporabi se lahko drugo pravo, vendar le z uporabo klavzule o izjemi iz sekcije 3.
Another law might be applied, but only through the escape clause of Section 3.
Ta novi dodatek širi in s tem zamegljuje pomen kraja dela kot običajnega povezovalnega dejavnika.
This new addition extends and thereby obscures the meaning of the place of work as the regular connecting factor.
To pravilo bi lahko tudi spodbudilo trend podpisovanja pogodb o zaposlitvi zgolj kot krinke za pravo pogodbo.
Moreover, this rule could also stimulate that employment contracts are signed only as cover for the real contract.
To pravilo bi zatorej moralo biti zbrisano.
This rule should therefore be deleted.
Besedna zveza "iz katere" je zelo dvoumna.
The terms ‘from which’ are highly ambiguous.
Namen predloga spremembe je preprečiti redno napotitev na delo iz države članice, v kateri je delovno pravo manj razvito kot v državi napotitve.
The amendment aims to prevent regular posting from a Member State where employment law is less developed than in the country of posting.
Člen 6, odstavek 2, točka (a a) (novo)
Article 6, paragraph 2, point (a a) (new)
(aa) pravo države, iz katere delavec običajno izpolnjuje delovno obveznost iz pogodbe, če delavec običajno ne opravlja svojega dela samo v eni državi;
(aa) if the employee does not habitually carry out his work in any one country, by the law of the country from which the employee habitually caries out his wok in performance of the contract ;
razen če iz vseh okoliščin izhaja, da je pogodba o zaposlitvi tesneje povezana z drugo državo; v tem primeru se za pogodbo uporablja pravo te druge države.
unless it appears from the circumstances as a whole that the contract is more closely connected with another country, in which case the contract shall be governed by the law of that country .
Pravo iz odstavka 2 se lahko zavrne, kadar iz vseh okoliščin izhaja, da je pogodba o zaposlitvi tesneje povezana z drugo državo; v tem primeru se za pogodbo uporablja pravo te druge države.
The law designated by paragraph 2 may be excluded where it appears from the circumstances as a whole that the contract is more closely connected with another country, in which case the contract shall be governed by the law of that country
Klavzula o prožnosti naj bi se uporabljala le v izjemnih primerih, na primer za delavce na letalih, ladjah in naftnih ploščadih.
This flexibility clause should be reserved for exceptional cases, such as that of employees required, for instance, to work in aircraft, on ships or on oil rigs.
Zato jo je bolje vključiti v člen, ki izrecno obravnava to vprašanje.
For this reason it is preferable to include the clause in the paragraph dealing specifically with that issue.
Za namene tega člena je prisilna določba določba, katere upoštevanje je po mnenju države potrebna za zaščito delavcev ali za zaščito njene politične, družbene ali gospodarske organizacije do take mere, da se uporaba te določbe zahteva v vsakem primeru, ki spada na njeno področje uporabe, ne glede na to, katero pravo se sicer uporablja za pogodbo na podlagi te uredbe.
For the purposes of this Article, mandatory rules are rules the respect for which is regarded as necessary by a country for protecting workers or for safeguarding its political, social or economic organisation to such an extent that they are applicable to any situation falling within their scope, irrespective of the law otherwise applicable to the contract under this Regulation.
Besedilo "za namene tega člena" je dodano zaradi jasnosti in doslednosti.
The text “for the purpose of this article” is added for the sake of clarity and consistency.
Prisilne določbe se pojavljajo v različnih členih te uredbe, vendar je tudi njihov pomen različen.
Mandatory requirements occur in different articles of the Regulation, but also with different meanings.
Zato se je treba dogovoriti, da opredelitev prisilnih določb v členu 8 velja samo v smislu tega specifičnega člena za pogodbe o zaposlitvi .
It is therefore important to settle that the definition of mandatory rules in Article 8 is only for the purpose of that specific article to contract of employment.
Besedi "odločilnega pomena" se nadomesti z besedo "potrebno".
The word ”crucial” is replaced by “necessary”.
Direktiva o napotitvi delavcev na delo temelji na možnosti države članice gostiteljice, da v primeru napotitve odstopa od prava države članice izvora.
The Posting of workers Directive (POW) is based on the possibility for the host MS to derogate from the law of the MS of origin in case of posting.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi prava v pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih (Rim I)
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)
o osnutku Sklepa Sveta o spremembi Poslovnika Sodišča v zvezi z obravnavanjem predlogov za sprejetje predhodnih odločb, ki se nanašajo na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice
on the draft Council decision amending the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice with regard to the treatment of questions referred for a preliminary ruling concerning the area of freedom, security and justice
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (11824/2007),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (11824/2007),
– ob upoštevanju člena 245 (2) Pogodbe ES in člena 160 Pogodbe Euratom, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom (C6 0292/2007),
– having regard to Article 245 (2) of the EC Treaty and Article 160 of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0292/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6–0451/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0451/2007 ),
Iz najnovejšega letnega poročila Sodišča je razvidno, da se delovna obremenitev Sodišča nenehno povečuje, pri čemer najpomembnejši del predstavljajo predhodne odločbe
It appears from the Court of Justice's latest Annual Report that the Court's workload is constantly increasing, with preliminary rulings still constituting the most important part of the its work
Leta 2006 je Sodišče obravnavalo 731 primerov.
In 2006, 731 cases were pending before the Court of Justice.
V 266-ih primerih od 546-ih, zaključenih leta 2006, je šlo za predhodne odločbe, v 251-ih od 537-ih novih primerov pa za sklicevanje na predhodne odločbe. .
266 out of 546 cases completed in 2006 were preliminary rulings, whilst 251 out of 537 new cases were references for a preliminary ruling. .
Poleg tega ni mogoče predvideti, kako bo povečana dejavnost iz naslova VI Pogodbe o EU in naslova IV Pogodbe o ES učinkovala na obremenitev Sodišča, saj je Sodišče zavezano, da odloča o vsakem prejetem veljavnem sklicu.
In addition to this, the Court being bound to give a ruling on each valid reference received, it is impossible to predict the impact that increased activity under Title VI EU and Title IV EC will have on the case-load of the Court.
Vseeno pa sedanje številke kažejo na občutno povečanje števila primerov glede območja svobode, pravice in varnosti ter pravosodja in notranjih zadev
Nevertheless, current figures show a clear increase in cases concerning both the Area of freedom, justice and security, and Justice and home affairs
Leta 2006 je bilo izdanih 9 sodb o območju svobode, varnosti in pravice, 8 sodb in 5 nalogov pa je v obravnavi.
In 2006, 9 judgments were handed down in the Area of freedom, security and justice, whereas 8 judgments and 5 orders are pending.
Na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev je Sodišče izdalo 1 sodbo in 1 nalog, 1 sodba in 1 nalog pa sta v obravnavi. .
In the field of Justice and home affairs, the Court handed down 1 judgment and 1 order, and 1 judgment and 1 order are pending. .
Čeprav še ni veliko sklicev iz držav članic, ki so k Skupnosti pristopile leta 2004 in 2007
Furthermore, although the number of references from the Member States having acceded to the Community in 2004 and 2007 is not yet significant
Novi sklici leta 2006: Češka (3) Litva (1), Madžarska (4), Poljska (2), Slovaška (1); sedem drugih „novih“ držav članic (0). , pa ni mogoče izključiti nepričakovanega povečanja, saj so sodišča v teh državah članicah vse bolj seznanjena s pravom Skupnosti.
New references in 2006: CZ (3) LT (1), HU (4), PL (2), SK (1); seven other "new" Member States (0). , an unexpected rise cannot be excluded as courts in those Member States become increasingly familiar with Community law.
V tem okviru si Sodišče prizadeva skrajšati čas, ki je potreben za sklice za predhodne odločbe, za katerega se pogosto zdi, da je čezmeren, vendar pa je s sedanjimi 19,8 meseci na najnižji točki v preteklih desetih letih.
In this context, the Court has striven to reduce the time taken by references for a preliminary ruling which, although often perceived as excessive, currently stands at 19.8 months, its lowest point in at least ten years.
K skrajšanju je verjetno prispevalo tudi večje število zaposlenih na Sodišču kot rezultat pete in šeste širitve Unije.
The increase in the Court's judicial manpower as a result of the fifth and sixth enlargements of the Union may also have contributed to this reduction in timescale.
Pogodba iz Nice je uvedla več novih mehanizmov, zlasti „hitre“ in „pospešene“ postopke,
A number of new mechanisms were introduced by the Treaty of Nice, notably the "accelerated" and "expedited" procedures.
Členi 62a, 104a in 118 Poslovnika Sodišča. katerih pa Sodišče ne uporablja prav pogosto
Articles 62a, 104a and 118 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice.
Od leta 2000 je bilo v okviru sklicev za predhodno odločanje 31 zahtev za pospešene in hitre postopke, od tega je bila le ena odobrena. .
In the context of references for a preliminary ruling, there have been 31 requests for an expedited or accelerated procedure since 2000, with only one having been granted. .
Se pa Sodišče že dlje časa zaveda posledic svoje pristojnosti glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
The Court had however been conscious for some time of the implications of its jurisdiction over the Area of freedom, security and justice.
25. septembra 2006 je Sodišče s pismom predsednika začelo dialog s Svetom, katerega rezultat so bili vloženi predlogi spremembe k Statutu in Poslovniku z namenom, da se ustvari nov, „nujni postopek“ za predhodne odločbe.
On 25 September 2006, by letter from its President, the Court started a dialogue with the Council that resulted in proposed amendments to its Statute and Rules of Procedure with a view to creating a new "urgent procedure" for a preliminary ruling.
Cilj tega postopka je uravnotežiti pravice posameznikov, ki jih ogrožajo morebitni dolgotrajni postopki Sodišča (zlasti na področju azila, priseljevanja, zakonskih sporov in starševske odgovornosti) s pravico vseh zainteresiranih strani, da sodelujejo pri postopkih.
This procedure aims to balance individual rights put at risk by the possible length of the Court's procedure (in particular in the areas of asylum, immigration, matrimonial matters and parental responsibility) with the right for all interested parties to be heard and to contribute to the proceedings.
Predlagani nujni postopek bo Sodišču tudi omogočil, da upošteva kratke roke, ki jih določajo nekateri deli zakonodaje Skupnosti in nacionalne zakonodaje.
The proposed urgent procedure will also enable the Court to comply with the tight time-limits imposed by certain pieces of Community and national legislation.
Poročevalka želi podati štiri pripombe glede novega postopka.
Your rapporteur would like to make four comments in relation to this new procedure.
Najprej bi izrazila skrb nad dejstvom, da predlagani nujni postopek ne vključuje pisnih in posredovanih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca, čeprav bo med posvetovanji še vedno ustno svetoval senatu.
First of all, concern is expressed at the fact that the proposed urgent procedure will not include any written and reported submissions from the Advocate General, although he or she will still advise the Chamber orally in the course of its deliberations.
Poročevalka meni, da objava „mnenja“ generalnega pravobranilca ali povzetka ustnih argumentov, podanih brez navzočnosti javnosti, ne bi povzročila nesorazmernega dodatnega dela, niti ne bi vplivala na dolžino postopka pred Sodiščem.
Your rapporteur believes that the publication of the Advocate General's "opinion" or a synopsis of the arguments delivered orally in camera would not entail disproportionate additional work, nor would it affect the length of the procedure before the Court.
Nasprotno, lahko bi bila v veliko pomoč Sodišču in drugim nacionalnim sodiščem, saj bi jim pomagala pojasniti pravo Skupnosti in potencialno zmanjšati potrebo po nadaljnjih sklicih.
On the contrary, it could be of great benefit to the referring court, as well as other national courts by helping them to clarify Community law, thus potentially reducing the need for further references.
Drugič, za Sodišče je pomembno, da ima zadostno diskrecijo, da se samo odloča, katere primere bo obravnavalo po nujnem postopku.
Second, it is important for the Court to have sufficient discretion to decide for itself which cases will be dealt with under the urgent procedure.
Če bi se čezmerno število primerov obravnavalo po tem postopku, bi druge kategorije primerov neupravičeno zamujale, zlasti primeri kršitev, za katere se zdi Parlamentu posebno pomembno, da so rešeni hitro.
Indeed, if an excessive number of cases were to be dealt with under this procedure, other categories of cases could be unduly delayed, in particular infringement cases, the speedy resolution of which the Parliament considers particularly important.
Sodišče, ki nima skoraj nikakršnega nadzora nad prihajajočim obsegom dela, potrebuje določeno mero prilagodljivosti in samostojnosti, da se lahko sooča z nihanji v številu primerov.
The Court, having virtually no control over its incoming workflow, needs a degree of flexibility and autonomy in order to deal with fluctuations in its caseload.
Tretjič, poročevalka je nekoliko presenečena nad tem, da je samostojnost Sodišča pri reševanju vprašanj glede lastnega postopka omejena do tolikšne mere, da je trajalo čezmerno dolgo, da se je našlo rešitev glede obravnavanega postopka
Third, your rapporteur is somewhat surprised that the Court's autonomy to solve issues concerning its own procedure is curtailed to the extent that it has taken an excessive amount of time to arrive at a solution concerning the procedure under discussion
Za spremembo Statuta Sodišča je potrebno soglasje v Svetu (člen 245 ES), medtem ko je za odobritev spremembe Poslovnika Sodišča potrebna kvalificirana večina (člen 223 ES, 6. alinea). .
Unanimity in Council is required to amend the Court's Statute (Article 245 EC) whereas a qualified majority is necessary to approve a change in the Court's Rules of Procedure (Article 223 EC, 6th indent). .
Razumljivo je, da države članice želijo obdržati svojo pravico, da učinkovito sodelujejo v primerih pred Sodiščem, vendar je treba poiskati rešitev za to, da se bo Sodišče v prihodnje lahko hitreje in samostojneje prilagajalo spremembam.
Whilst understanding that Member States wish to preserve their right to participate effectively in cases before the Court, a way has to be found for the Court to be able to adapt more swiftly and independently to change in the future.
Poročevalka tudi meni, da je sedaj pravi trenutek, da se začne dolgoročno razmišljati o organizacijski strukturi in sestavi Sodišča (tukaj mišljeno v najširšem smislu, vključno s Sodiščem prve stopnje in Sodiščem za uslužbence).
Finally, your rapporteur considers that the moment is now ripe to start considering the organisational structure and composition of the Court (here understood in the widest sense, including the Court of First Instance and the Staff Tribunal) in the longer term.
Ti sta od nastanka Skupnosti ostali večinoma nespremenjeni.
These have remained largely unchanged since the inception of the Communities.
Če se nujni postopek izkaže za uspešnejšega od „hitrega“ in „pospešenega“, bi to lahko še bolj povečalo potrebo po reformi, saj nacionalna sodišča nujna vprašanja vse pogosteje naslavljajo na Sodišče.
Moreover, should the urgent procedure prove more successful than its "accelerated" and "expedited" counterparts, this could further increase the need for reform as national courts increasingly refer urgent questions to the Court of Justice.
Obravnavanje predlogov za sprejetje predhodnih odločb, ki se nanašajo na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice
Treatment of questions referred for a preliminary ruling concerning the area of freedom, security and justice –
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o zagotovitvi makrofinančne pomoči Skupnosti Libanonu
on the proposal for a Council decision providing Community macro-financial assistance to Lebanon
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................20
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................20