natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ti ukrepi, ki so namenjeni spremembi nebistvenih določb te direktive z njenim dopolnjevanjem, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 22(3).
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 22(3).
Komisiji lahko pri izvajanju določb iz točk (a) do (c) tega odstavka pomaga Odbor za politiko radijskega spektra .
In the implementation of the provisions of points (a) to (c) of this paragraph, the Commission may be assisted by the RSPC .
Člen 9 c a (novo)
Article 9c a (new)
Člen 9c a
Article 9c a
Povezava med to direktivo in mednarodnimi sporazumi ter organizacijami
The relationship between this Directive and international agreements and organisations
Komisija spremlja napredek v zvezi z radijskim spektrom v tretjih državah in mednarodnih organizacijah, vključno z ITU, ki lahko vpliva na izvajanje te direktive.
The Commission shall monitor developments regarding radio spectrum in third countries and in international organisations, including the ITU, which may have implications for the implementation of this Directive.
Države članice Komisijo obvestijo o vseh pravnih ali dejanskih težavah pri izvajanju te direktive, ki izhajajo iz obstoječih mednarodnih sporazumov ali sporazumov s tretjimi državami oziroma mednarodnimi organizacijami, vključno z ITU.
Member States shall inform the Commission of any difficulties created, de jure or de facto, by existing international agreements, or agreements with third countries or international organisations, including the ITU, in relation to the implementation of this Directive.
Komisija redno poroča Parlamentu in Svetu o rezultatih uporabe odstavkov 1 in 2 ter lahko po potrebi predlaga ukrepe, da bi zagotovila izvajanje načel in ciljev te direktive.
The Commission shall report regularly on the results of the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 to the Parliament and the Council and may, where appropriate, propose measures with the aim of ensuring the implementation of the principles and objectives of this Directive.
Kadar je potrebno, se sprejmejo skupni politični cilji, s katerimi se zagotovi usklajevanje med državami članicami.
When necessary, common policy objectives shall be agreed to ensure coordination among Member States.
Ukrepi, sprejeti po tem členu, ne posegajo v pravice in obveznosti Skupnosti ter držav članic, ki izhajajo iz veljavnih mednarodnih sporazumov.
Measures taken pursuant to this Article shall be without prejudice to the rights and obligations of the Community and the Member States under relevant international agreements.
Za zagotovitev učinkovite uporabe spektra je bistveno, da operaterji upoštevajo postopke prijave in usklajevanja v skladu z mednarodno zavezujočimi predpisi in postopki ITU ter se lahko nanje zanašajo, da bi zagotovili uspešno usklajevanje in uporabo omrežja ali sistema.
To ensure efficient spectrum use it is essential that operators comply with and can rely on the filing and coordination procedures under the internationally binding rules and procedures of the ITU in order to ensure that a network or system can be successfully coordinated and brought into use.
Člen 1 – točka 11 – točka b
Article 1 – point 11 - point b
Člen 10 – odstavek 4 – pododstavek 2
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Člen 2 – točka 3 – točka a
Article 2 – point 3 - point a
Ti postopki se ne uporabljajo za odstavek 1(b) tega člena.
Those procedures shall not apply to paragraph 1(b) of this Article.
Člen 5 – odstavek 1 – uvodno besedilo
Article 5 – paragraph 1 - introductory wording
Države članice pospešujejo uporabo radijskih frekvenc v skladu s splošno odobritvijo .
Member States shall facilitate the usage of radio frequencies under general authorisation .
Države članice podelijo individualne pravice, da bi :
Member States may grant individual rights in order to:
Čeprav bi bile lahko z razvojem tehnologije za preprečevanje težav z motnjami splošne odobritve dolgoročno uspešna rešitev, pa bi se moralo podeljevanje individualnih pravic ohraniti kot običajen postopek za dodeljevanje spektra.
Although general authorisations might be a viable solution in the long term when technology to prevent interference problems develops, granting individual licences should continue to be the normal procedure for assigning spectrum.
Člen 5 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) izogibanja tveganju škodljivih motenj; ali
(a) avoid the risk of harmful interference; or
Brez poseganja v posebna merila, ki jih države vnaprej opredelijo za podelitev pravic uporabe radijskih frekvenc ponudnikom storitev radijskih ali televizijskih radiodifuzijskih vsebin za izpolnjevanje ciljev splošnega interesa v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, se take pravice uporabe podeljujejo z objektivnimi, preglednimi, nediskriminatornimi in sorazmernimi postopki, v primeru radijskih frekvenc pa v skladu z določbami člena 9 Direktive 2002/21/ES (Okvirna direktiva).
Without prejudice to specific criteria defined in advance by Member States to grant rights of use of radio frequencies to providers of radio or television broadcast content services with a view to pursuing general interest objectives in conformity with Community law, such rights of use shall be granted through objective, transparent, non‑discriminatory and proportionate procedures, and, in the case of radio frequencies, in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive).
Postopki so tudi odprti, razen v primerih, ko je podelitev individualnih pravic uporabe radijskih frekvenc ponudnikom storitev radijskih ali televizijskih radiodifuzijskih vsebin bistvena za izpolnjevanje določene obveznosti, ki jo država članica vnaprej opredeli in je potrebna za doseganje cilja splošnega interesa v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
The procedures shall also be open, except in cases where the granting of individual rights of use of radio frequencies to the providers of radio or television broadcast content services can be shown to be essential for fulfilling a particular obligation defined in advance by the Member State which is necessary to achieve a general interest objective in conformity with Community law.
Brez poseganja v posebna merila in postopke , ki jih države opredelijo za podelitev pravic uporabe radijskih frekvenc ponudnikom storitev radijskih ali televizijskih radiodifuzijskih vsebin za izpolnjevanje ciljev splošnega interesa v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, se take pravice uporabe podeljujejo z objektivnimi, preglednimi, nediskriminatornimi in sorazmernimi postopki, v primeru radijskih frekvenc pa v skladu z določbami člena 9 Direktive 2002/21/ES (Okvirna direktiva).
Without prejudice to specific criteria and procedures defined by Member States to grant rights of use of radio frequencies to providers of broadcast radio or television content services with a view to pursuing general interest objectives in conformity with Community law, such rights of use shall be granted through objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate procedures, and, in the case of radio frequencies, in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive).
Predlog ustreza veljavni direktivi, ki se je izkazala za uporabno in učinkovito.
The proposal corresponds to the directive which is currently into force and which has proved to be functional and efficient.
Vsaka individualna pravica uporabe radijskih frekvenc, ki se podeli za deset let ali več in ki je podjetja v skladu s členom 9b Okvirne direktive ne morejo prenesti ali dati v zakup, je vsakih pet let in prvič pet let po njeni izdaji predmet pregleda, ob upoštevanju meril iz odstavka 1.
Any individual right to use radio frequencies that is granted for ten years or more and that may not be transferred or leased between undertakings as allowed by Article 9b of the Framework Directive shall, every five years and for the first time five years after its issuance, be subject to a review in the light of the criteria in paragraph 1.
Če merila za podelitev individualnih pravic uporabe ne veljajo več, se individualna pravica spremeni v splošno odobritev za uporabo radijskih frekvenc, ob predhodnem obvestilu največ pet let po zaključku pregleda, ali pa pravica postane prosto prenosljiva ali na voljo za zakup med podjetji.
If the criteria to grant individual rights of use are no longer applicable, the individual right of use shall be changed into a general authorisation for the use of radio frequencies, subject to prior notice of not more than five years from the conclusion of the review, or shall be made freely transferable or leasable between undertakings.
Vsaka individualna pravica uporabe radijskih frekvenc, ki se podeli za deset let ali več in ki je podjetja v skladu s členom 9b Okvirne direktive ne morejo prenesti ali dati v zakup, je vsakih deset let in prvič deset let po njeni izdaji predmet pregleda, ob upoštevanju meril iz odstavka 1.
Any individual right to use radio frequencies that is granted for ten years or more and that may not be transferred or leased between undertakings as allowed by Article 9b of the Framework Directive shall, every ten years and for the first time ten years after its issuance, be subject to a review in the light of the criteria in paragraph 1.
Če merila za podelitev individualnih pravic uporabe ne veljajo več, se individualna pravica spremeni v splošno odobritev za uporabo radijskih frekvenc, ob predhodnem obvestilu največ deset let po zaključku pregleda, ali pa pravica postane prosto prenosljiva ali na voljo za zakup med podjetji.
If the criteria to grant individual rights of use are no longer applicable, the individual right of use shall be changed into a general authorisation for the use of radio frequencies, subject to prior notice of not more than ten years from the conclusion of the review, or shall be made freely transferable or leasable between undertakings.
Pri sprejemanju take odločitve se ustrezno upošteva potrebo po omogočanju ustrezne dobe amortizacije za vlaganja.
In taking such a decision, due account shall be taken of the need to allow for an appropriate period for amortization of investment.
Za številne nove platforme in storitve bo amortizacija vlaganj trajala več kot deset let ali, v primeru nične stopnje, pet let.
For many new platforms and services, investment will need to be amortized over a period exceeding ten or, at nay rate, five years.
Uvajanje strogih zahtev za nacionalne regulativne organe za izvedbo formalnega pregleda vseh dovoljenj v oddajnem spektru vsakih pet let ne bi bilo ustrezno.
It would be disproportionate to introduce a rigid requirement for national regulatory authorities to conduct a formal review of all broadcast spectrum licenses every five years.
Člen 6 a – odstavek 1 – uvodno besedilo
Article 6a – paragraph 1 - introductory wording
Za doseganje ciljev iz člena 1 in brez poseganja v člen 5(2) te direktive lahko Komisija sprejme izvedbene ukrepe:
In order to achieve the objectives set out in Article 1, and without prejudice to Article 5 ( 2) of this Directive, the Commission may adopt implementing measures:
Za doseganje ciljev iz člena 1 in brez poseganja v člen 5(1) in (2) te direktive ter člena 8a in 9 Direktive 2002/21/ES (okvirne direktive) lahko Komisija sprejme izvedbene ukrepe::
In order to achieve the objectives set out in Article 1, and without prejudice to Article 5 (1) and (2) of this Directive and Articles 8a and 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) , the Commission may adopt implementing measures:
Člen 6a – odstavek 1 – točka a
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) za opredelitev radiofrekvenčnih pasov, katerih uporaba mora biti predmet splošnih odobritev;
(a) to identify radio frequency bands the use of which is to be made subject to general authorisations;
Vse izvedbene ukrepe v skladu s členom 6a (usklajevanje) bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom.
All implementing measures under Article 6a (harmonisation) should be adopted according to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Uporaba nujnega postopka ni upravičena za sprejemanje takšnih ukrepov.
The urgency procedure is not justified for the adoption of these measures.
Člen 6 a – odstavek 1 – točka c
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point c
Člen 6 a – odstavek 1 – točka d
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) za uskladitev pogojev, določenih v Prilogi II, v zvezi s splošnimi odobritvami ali individualnimi pravicami uporabe radijskih frekvenc ali številk;
(d) to harmonise the conditions specified in Annex II relating to general authorisations or individual rights of use for radio frequencies or numbers;
Člen 6 a – odstavek 1 – točka e
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point e
Člen 6 a – odstavek 1 – točka f
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point f
Člen 6a – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 2
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Ti ukrepi , navedeni v točkah (a) do (d) in (f) , ki so namenjeni spremembam nebistvenih elementov te direktive z njihovo dopolnitvijo, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 14a(3).
The measures listed in points (a) to (d) and (f) , designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 14a(3).
Ukrepi iz prvega odstavka, namenjeni spremembam nebistvenih elementov te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 14a(3).
The measures listed in the first subparagraph , designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 14a(3).
Člen 6 b – odstavek 1
Article 6b - paragraph 1
Člen 6 b – odstavek 2
Article 6b – paragraph 2
Člen 14 a – odstavek 4
Article 14a – paragraph 4
Člen 3 – točka 15
Article 3 - point 15
(15) Doda se nova Priloga II, katere besedilo je določeno v Prilogi k tej direktivi.
(15) A new Annex II, the text of which is set out in the Annex to this Directive, is added.
(d) metoda določitve pristojbin za uporabo za pravico uporabe radijskih frekvenc , se brez poseganja v sisteme držav članic, kjer obveznost plačevanja pristojbin za uporabo nadomesti obveznost izpolnjevanja posebnih ciljev javnega interesa ;
(d) the method of determining usage fees for the right of use of the radio frequencies , without prejudice to systems defined by Member States where the obligation to pay usage fees is replaced by an obligation to fulfil specific general interest objectives ;
Takšni sistemi so običajni na področju kopenskih oddajnih frekvenc, kjer služijo ciljem zagotavljanja medijskega pluralizma.
Such systems are commonplace with regard to terrestrial broadcasting frequencies where they serve of media pluralism objectives.
Namen predloga Komisije je sprememba obstoječega evropskega regulativnega okvira za elektronsko komunikacijo, torej okvirne direktive ter direktiv o odobritvi in dostopu, da bi dosegli resničen notranji trg telekomunikacij.
The Commission proposal seeks to amend the current regulatory framework for electronic communications, consisting of the framework, authorisation and access directives, with a view to securing a genuine internal market in telecommunications.
Osnovni cilji predloga so izboljšanje učinkovitosti elektronskih komunikacij, zagotovitev učinkovitejše in preprostejše ureditve za operaterje in za nacionalne regulativne organe (NRO) in uskladitev pravil Skupnosti, da bi povečali naložbe, inovacije in koristi za potrošnike.
The main objectives of the proposal are to improve the effectiveness of electronic communications, ensure simpler and more efficient regulation for both operators and national regulatory authorities (NRA), and harmonise Community rules, with a view to increasing investment, innovation and consumer benefits.
Glavne spremembe okvirne direktive ter direktiv o odobritvi in dostopu so reforma na področju upravljanja spektra, uvedba funkcionalne ločitve in okrepitev pristojnosti Komisije v odnosu do držav članic.
The main changes to the framework, authorisation and access directives concern the reform of spectrum management, the introduction of and strengthening the powers of the Commission vis-à-vis the Member States.
Pripravljavec mnenja predlaga naslednje predloge sprememb:
The rapporteur suggests the following amendments to the proposal:
● v zadnjem odstavku člena 6 o objavljanju rezultatov postopkov nacionalnih regulativnih organov je treba zagotoviti več zaupnosti pri podatkih, ki jih podjetja posredujejo;
· In the last paragraph of Article 6, which deals with the publication of the results of the consultation procedure by NRAs, greater confidentiality needs to be ensured for the information forwarded by undertakings.
● v členu 19(1) o usklajevalnih ukrepih, ki jih Komisija sprejme, če nacionalni regulativni organi različno izvajajo regulativne naloge, določene v okvirni direktivi in posebnih direktivah, lahko Komisija odloča po lastni presoji pri izbiri med sklepom in priporočilom, pri tem pa regulativni postopek s pregledom uporabi le pri sklepu; ustreznost te določbe je dvomljiva, saj bi bilo tako sodelovanje Parlamenta odvisno od izbire Komisije;
· In Article 19(1), with regard to the harmonisation measures to be adopted by the Commission when there are divergences in the implementation by NRAs of the regulatory tasks specified in the framework directive and in the specific directives, the Commission is given the discretion to choose between a ‘decision’ and a ‘recommendation’, with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny applicable only to the former; there are therefore grounds for wondering whether this provision is appropriate since, ultimately, the extent of Parliament’s participation would depend on the choice made by the Commission.
● v členu 21(2) in (3) o reševanju čezmejnih sporov med strankami v različnih državah članicah je treba dodati, da usklajevanje prizadevanj nacionalnih regulativnih organov pri reševanju sporov lahko privede do sprejetja skupnega sklepa.
· In Article 21(2) and (3), with regard to cross-border disputes between parties in different Member States, it should be specified that the coordination of the efforts by the national regulatory authorities to resolve the dispute could go as far as the adoption of a joint decision.
● v členu 10 o izpolnjevanju pogojev splošne odobritve ali pravic uporabe in posebnih obveznosti je treba dodati odstavek 6a (novo), ki bo določal, da morajo države članice vedno dovoliti sodni nadzor sankcij iz odstavkov 5 in 6 v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
· In Article 10, with regard to compliance with the conditions of the general authorisation or of rights of use and the specific obligations, a new paragraph 6a should be introduced, stipulating that the Member States should always allow the penalties laid down in paragraphs 5 and 6 to be subject to judicial review, in accordance with national law.
Predlog Direktive – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a directive – amending act
(3 a) Če ne obstaja druga bolj specifična pravna podlaga, se upošteva člen 95 Pogodbe o ES, ki omogoča sprejetje splošnih ukrepov za usklajevanje zakonodaje držav članic, katerih namen je vzpostavitev in delovanje notranjega trga, s postopkom soodločanja med Parlamentom in Svetom.
(3a) In the absence of other more specific legal bases, reference should be made to Article 95 of the EC Treaty, which provides for general measures to be adopted by codecision between Parliament and the Council to approximate the laws of the Member States which have as their object the establishment and functioning of the internal market.
Ta člen je pravna podlaga za zakonodajne akte, ki jih spreminja ta predlog, in je razmeroma horizontalne narave, kar upravičuje izbiro.
The article in question is also the legal basis for the legislative acts amended by this proposal which, furthermore, has an essentially horizontal scope, justifying the choice.
Ustanovitev regulativnega organa na evropski ravni pa lahko zahteva uporabo člena 308 Pogodbe o ES kot splošne klavzule, čeprav v skladu s to določbo Evropski parlament izgubi pravico soodločanja.
However, the setting up of a regulatory authority at European level might require the application of Article 308 of the EC Treaty as a general clause, although under this provision the European Parliament does not enjoy power of codecision.
Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo zato zagotoviti celovitost in varnost javnih komunikacijskih omrežij .
National regulatory authorities should therefore ensure the integrity and security of public communications networks are maintained.
Ob upoštevanju, da uspešna uporaba ustrezne varnosti ni enkratno izvajanje, temveč trajen proces izvajanja, pregledov in posodabljanja, je treba zahtevati, da ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev sprejmejo ukrepe za varovanje njihove celovitosti in varnosti v skladu z ocenjenimi tveganji , ob upoštevanju stanja takšnih ukrepov .
Bearing in mind that the successful application of adequate security is not a one-off exercise but a continuous process of implementation, review and updating, the providers of electronic communications networks and services should be required to take measures to safeguard their integrity and security in accordance with the assessed risks , taking into account the state of the art of such measures .
(32) Razpoložljivost elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev je pri nujnih primerih bistvena.
(32) The availability of electronic communications services is essential in cases of emergency.
Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo zato zagotoviti , da se vzdržuje minimalna raven razpoložljivosti omrežja, ki se v izrednih razmerah uporablja za nujne komunikacije.
National regulatory authorities should therefore ensure that a minimum standard of network availability is maintained to support essential communications in emergency situations.
Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo imeti potrebna sredstva za opravljanje svojih dolžnosti, vključno s pooblastili za pridobivanje zadostnih informacij, ki omogočajo oceno ravni varnosti omrežij in storitev, ter izčrpnih in zanesljivih podatkov o dejanskih varnostnih incidentih, ki so močno vplivali na delovanje omrežij ali storitev.
The national regulatory authorities should have the necessary means to perform their duties, including powers to obtain sufficient information to be able to assess the level of security of networks or services as well as comprehensive and reliable data about actual security incidents that have had a significant impact on the operation of networks or services.
Ob upoštevanju, da uspešna uporaba ustrezne varnosti ni enkratno izvajanje, temveč trajen proces izvajanja, pregledov in posodabljanja, morajo ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev sprejeti ukrepe za zagotovitev osnovne razpoložljivosti omrežja v skladu z ocenjenimi tveganji.
Bearing in mind that the successful application of adequate security is not a one-off exercise but a continuous process of implementation, review and updating, the providers of electronic communications networks and services should take measures to ensure essential network availability in accordance with the assessed risks.
Regulativni poseg je upravičen, da se zagotovi razpoložljivost komunikacijskega omrežja za osnovne komunikacije v nujnih primerih, vendar morajo raven varnosti za zaščito običajnih komunikacij v običajnih okoliščinah oblikovati povpraševanje potrošnikov in konkurenca na trgu, ne pa regulativna odredba.
Regulatory intervention is justified to ensure the availability of communications networks for essential communications in case of emergency, but customer demand and market competition rather than regulatory fiat should determine the level of security provided to protect ordinary communications under normal conditions.