natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I. ker so Evropska unija in 25 od 27 držav članic že podpisale in ratificirale Okvirno konvencijo Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije za nadzor nad tobakom ter je v njeni preambuli navedeno, da obveznost zaščite pred tobačnim dimom izhaja iz temeljnih človekovih pravic in svoboščin, ter je v skladu s členom 8 okvirne konvencije zaščita pred tobačnim dimom temeljna pravica,
I. whereas the European Union and 25 of the 27 Member States have already signed and ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), in the preamble to which it is stated that the obligation to ensure protection from tobacco smoke is rooted in basic human rights and freedoms and Article 8 of which lays down that protection from exposure to tobacco smoke is a fundamental right,
J. ker bo korist za družbo in gospodarstvo največja, če bo nekadilska območja dopolnjevala učinkovita politika za odvajanje od kajenja na ravni EU in/ali držav članic, na primer (a) učinkoviti programi za odvajanje od kajenja v izobraževalnih in zdravstvenih ustanovah, na delovnem mestu in v športnih objektih ter boljši dostop do (vedenjskih in farmakoloških) terapij za opuščanje kajenja pri osebah, ki si želijo prenehati kaditi, (b) diagnosticiranje in zdravljenje odvisnosti od tobaka v nacionalnih zdravstvenih in izobraževalnih programih ter (c) sodelovanje za boljšo možnost in dostopnost zdravljenja, kot določa člen 14 okvirne konvencije,
J. whereas the most benefit for society and the economy will be best achieved when smoke-free areas are complemented with effective smoking cessation policies at EU and/or Member State level, such as a) effective cessation promotion programmes in educational institutions, health care facilities, workplaces and sporting environments and increased access to cessation therapies (both behavioural and pharmacological) for persons who wish to stop smoking, b) diagnosis and treatment of tobacco dependence in national health and education programmes, and c) collaboration to facilitate accessibility and affordability as agreed in Article 14 of the FCTC,
K. ker je dolžnost odgovorne politike, da ustvari okolje, v katerem kajenje ne bo več obravnavano kot nekaj običajnega, ki bo spodbujalo kadilce k omejevanju ali prenehanju kajenja in jih bo pri odvajanju od kajenja podpiralo ter bo otroke in mlade odvračalo od kajenja,
K. whereas a responsible policy has a duty to create an environment in which smoking is no longer seen as normal, that encourages people to cut down on or give up smoking, that supports them in the cessation process and that prevents children and young people from taking up smoking,
L. ker lahko le popolna prepoved kajenja v vseh zaprtih delovnih prostorih, tudi tam, kjer se strežeta hrana in pijača, ter v vseh javnih prostorih in prevoznih sredstvih varuje zdravje delavcev in nekadilcev in ker bodo kadilci tako veliko lažje opustili kajenje,
L. whereas only a full smoking ban in all enclosed workplaces, including catering and drinking establishments, and all public buildings and transport can protect the health of employees and non-smokers and make it considerably easier for smokers to give up,
M. ker ni ugotovljeno, da se je v državah članicah, ki so uvedle popolno prepoved kajenja, zmanjšal promet v gostinstvu,
M. whereas the catering industry has not suffered any noticeable loss in revenue in the countries in which a full smoking ban has been introduced,
N. ker je Svetovna banka v svojem poročilu iz leta 1999 „Zajezitev epidemije: vlade in gospodarski vidiki nadzora nad tobakom” dokazala stroškovno učinkovitost davčnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje povpraševanja po tobačnih izdelkih in skupne porabe tobaka ter je tudi Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija poudarila, da ima obdavčitev največji vpliv,
N. whereas the World Bank has demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of taxation measures to reduce the demand for tobacco products and to reduce overall tobacco consumption, in its 1999 report ‘Curbing the epidemic: Governments and the economics of tobacco control’, and the WHO has also stressed that taxation has the greatest impact,
O. ker evropska strategija Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije na področju odvajanja od kajenja potrjuje, da so ukrepi za prenehanje kajenja (vedenjski in farmakološki) pomembna in stroškovno učinkovita sestavina celovite strategije nadzora nad tobakom, ki bo zdravstvenim sistemom v prihodnje prihranila veliko stroškov,
O. whereas the WHO’s European Strategy for Smoking Cessation Policy affirms that smoking cessation interventions (both behavioural and pharmacological) are an important and cost-efficient component of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy which will save health systems considerable expenditure in the future,
P. ker je znano, da imajo evropska gospodarstva zaradi porabe tobaka več sto milijard škode na leto,
P. whereas it is known that tobacco consumption costs European economies hundreds of billions annually,
Q. ker stroške v zdravstvenem sistemu, ki nastanejo zaradi porabe tobaka, krije celotno prebivalstvo in ne le povzročitelji,
Q. whereas the costs to health systems resulting from tobacco consumption are borne by the population in general and not by those responsible for creating them,
R. ker je nesprejemljivo, da nekatere države članice spodbujajo nakup tobačnih izdelkov z nizkimi davčnimi stopnjami v svojih državah, zato da povečujejo skupne davčne prihodke,
R. whereas it is unacceptable that certain Member States encourage the purchase of tobacco products by low taxation rates in their countries so as to increase their overall tax income,
S. ker je 70 % prebivalcev EU nekadilcev,
S. whereas 70% of the EU population are non-smokers,
T. ker 86 % državljanov EU podpira prepoved kajenja na delovnem mestu, 84 % prepoved kajenja na drugih javnih mestih, 77 % v restavracijah ter 61 % v barih in lokalih,
T. whereas 86% of EU citizens are in favour of a ban on smoking at work, 84% in other public places, 77% in restaurants and 61% in bars and pubs,
U. ker osveščanje ciljnih skupin, zlasti mladih, bodočih mater in staršev, pomaga pri zmanjševanju porabe tobaka,
U. whereas target-group-specific education, particularly of young people, pregnant women and parents, helps to reduce tobacco consumption,
3. ponavlja zahtevo iz resolucije z dne 23. februarja 2005 o evropskem akcijskem načrtu za okolje in zdravje za obdobje 2004–2010
Renews its call to the Commission, as issued in its resolution of 23 February 2005 on the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010
264. , da Komisija tobačni dim v okolju čim prej uvrsti v direktivo o nevarnih snoveh (67/548/EGS) kot rakotvorno snov 1. kategorije, da bo tobačni dim v okolju spadal na področje uporabe direktive o rakotvornih in mutagenih snoveh (2004/37/ES);
264. , to classify environmental tobacco smoke in the Dangerous Substances Directive (67/548/EEC) a class 1 carcinogen as soon as possible so as to bring environmental tobacco smoke under the scope of the Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive (2004/37/EC);
7. poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predlog spremembe okvirne direktive o varnosti in zdravju delavcev pri delu (89/391/EGS) in od vseh delodajalcev zahteva, da zagotovijo, da na delovnem mestu ne bo tobačnega dima;
Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for an amendment of the Framework Directive on Workplace Safety and Health (89/391//EEC) requiring all employers to ensure that the workplace is free from tobacco smoke;
Direktiva 2001/37/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. junija 2001 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o izdelavi, predstavitvi in prodaji tobačnih izdelkov (UL L 194, 18.7.2001, str.
Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products (OJ L 194, 18.7.2001, p.
26). (direktiva o tobačnih izdelkih), ki vključuje najmanj:
26.) on tobacco products, containing at least the following:
· takojšnjo prepoved vseh aditivov, ki povečujejo odvisnost,
· an immediate ban on all addiction-enhancing additives,
· takojšnjo prepoved vseh aditivov, ki so na podlagi dostopnih toksikoloških podatkov rakotvorni, mutageni ali strupeni za razmnoževanje sami po sebi ali ob pirolizi (sežiganje pri 600 do 950 °C), uvedbo natančnega postopka registracije, vrednotenja in odobritve tobačnih aditivov ter popolnega označevanja vseh tobačnih aditivov na embalaži,
· an immediate ban on all additives shown by existing toxicological data to be carcinogenic , mutagenic, or toxic to reproduction as such or upon pyrolysis (burning at a temperature of between 600 and 950°C), introduction of a detailed registration, evaluation and authorisation procedure for tobacco additives, and complete on-pack labelling of all tobacco additives,
· samodejno prepoved vseh aditivov, za katere proizvajalci in uvozniki tobačnih izdelkov do konca leta 2008 ne predložijo popolnih podatkov (med drugim seznam vseh sestavin in količin teh sestavin za vsako blagovno znamko in vsako vrsto posebej ter njihove toksikološke podatke),
· an automatic ban on all additives for which manufacturers and importers of tobacco products do not have complete data sets by the end of 2008 (including lists of all ingredients by brand name and type, along with their quantities and toxicological data),
· obveznost proizvajalcev, da omogočijo javni dostop do vseh obstoječih toksikoloških podatkov o aditivih in snoveh v tobačnem dimu, vključno s produkti pirolize (javne in interne podatke),
· a requirement for manufacturers to make publicly available all existing toxicological data on the additives and ingredients in tobacco smoke, including pyrolysis products (public and in-house data),
· pripravo zbirke tobačnih aditivov in snovi v tobačnem dimu ter obveščanje potrošnikov o tem,
· the development of a compendium of tobacco additives and substances in tobacco smoke and the provision of consumer information in this respect,
· uvedbo sistema financiranja, po katerem vse stroške za vzpostavitev in vzdrževanje ocenjevalnih in nadzornih struktur (npr. neodvisnih laboratorijev, osebja, znanstvenih raziskav) krijejo proizvajalci tobačnih izdelkov,
· introduction of a financing system that makes tobacco product manufacturers liable for all costs of developing and maintaining assessment and supervisory structures (e.g. independent laboratories, staff and scientific investigations),
· določitev, da so za izdelke odgovorni proizvajalci, in uvedbo odgovornosti proizvajalca za financiranje vseh zdravstvenih stroškov, ki jih povzroči poraba tobaka;
· application of product liability in respect of manufacturers and introduction of manufacturer liability for the financing of all health costs arising from tobacco consumption;
· prepoved uporabe tobaka v zasebnih prevoznih sredstvih v navzočnosti mladoletnih v celotni EU,
· an EU-wide ban on the use of tobacco in the presence of minors in private transport ,
· prepoved prodaje tobačnih izdelkov osebam, mlajšim od 18 let, v celotni EU,
· an EU-wide ban on the sale of tobacco products to young people under 18,
· izdajo dovoljenja za namestitev avtomata za cigarete le, če je ta nedostopen mlajšim od 18 let,
· the granting of a permit for the installation of cigarette machines only where the machines will be inaccessible to young people under 18,
· umik tobačnih izdelkov s samopostrežnih polic v trgovinah na drobno,
· the removal of tobacco products from self-service displays in retail outlets,
· preprečitev prodaje tobačnih izdelkov mlajšim od 18 let na daljavo (npr. prek interneta),
· a ban on distance sales of tobacco products to young people under 18 (e.g. over the Internet),
· podporo preventivnim ukrepom in protikadilskim kampanjam za mlade,
· promotion of preventive measures and antismoking campaigns for young people,
· prepoved oglaševanja tobačnih izdelkov na internetu,
· a ban on Internet advertisement of tobacco products,
· spodbujanje držav članic k uvedbi obdavčitve vseh tobačnih izdelkov, na katero inflacija ne bi vplivala,
· encouraging Member States to introduce inflation-proof taxation on all tobacco products,
· visoko najnižjo stopnjo obdavčitve tobačnih izdelkov, ki bi veljala za celotno EU,
· an EU-wide high minimum level of taxation of tobacco products,
· strožji nadzor nad tihotapljenjem tobaka;
· stronger controls against tobacco smuggling;
· povečan dostop do farmakoloških (npr. zdravljenje z nadomeščanjem nikotina) in vedenjskih (svetovanje) terapij za odvajanje od kajenja s pomočjo povračil in dejavnostjo izvajalcev zdravstvenega varstva,
· increased access to cessation therapies - both pharmacological (e.g. nicotine replacement therapy) and behavioural (counselling) - through reimbursement and interventions of healthcare providers;
· večja dostopnost izdelkov za odvajanje od kajenja (npr. nadomestil nikotina) z uvedbo nižje stopnje DDV;
· increased affordability of smoking cessation products (e.g. nicotine replacement products) through a reduced VAT rate;
19. poziva države članice, naj oblikujejo kampanje obveščanja in osveščanja o zdravem načinu življenja, ki bodo prikrojene vsem starostnim in družbenim skupinam, da bodo državljani prevzeli odgovornost zase in po potrebi tudi starševsko odgovornost;
Calls on the Member States to conduct information and education campaigns concerning healthy lifestyles tailored to all age ranges and social groups in order to enable people to shoulder responsibility for themselves and, where applicable, their children;
22. spodbuja Komisijo, naj še naprej izvaja podporne ukrepe na ravni EU, kot so ukrepi ozaveščanja; meni, da je usposabljanje zdravnikov in drugih zdravstvenih delavcev pomembno in mu je zato treba dati prednost;
Encourages the Commission to continue to implement support measures at EU level, e.g. awareness-raising measures; considers that developing the skills of doctors and other health care personnel should be an important field, to which priority is assigned;
24. kot ena od vej proračunskega organa poziva k financiranju takšnih ukrepov ozaveščanja, ki jih zdaj financira Sklad Skupnosti za tobak, tudi po porabi temu namenjenih sredstev sklada;
Calls, as one arm of the budgetary authority, for the financing of these awareness-raising measures, which is currently assured by the Community Tobacco Fund, to continue to be guaranteed when the fund is phased out;
28. ob upoštevanju svoje vloge, da je drugim za vzor, poziva predsedstvo, naj nemudoma prepove kajenje brez izjem v vseh prostorih Evropskega parlamenta; poziva k strogemu izvajanju te prepovedi;
Calls on the Bureau, in the light of its duty to set an example, to adopt a smoking ban with no exemptions in all parts of the European Parliament with immediate effect; calls for a rigorous enforcement of this ban;
Tobačni dim je najpomembnejša in najnevarnejša škodljiva snov v zaprtih prostorih, ki se ji lahko izognemo, ter glavni vzrok za onesnaženost zraka v zaprtih prostorih.
Tobacco smoke is the most significant and dangerous avoidable indoor pollutant and the main cause of indoor air pollution.
Vsebuje na tisoče kemičnih snovi, med njimi več kot 250 rakotvornih in strupenih snovi.
It contains thousands of chemicals, including 250 carcinogenic and toxic substances.
Za večino rakotvornih snovi iz tobačnega dima ni mogoče določiti mejne vrednosti izpostavljenosti, pod katero naj te snovi ne bi škodljivo vplivale na zdravje.
For most of the carcinogens in tobacco smoke there is no exposure threshold below which there are no anticipated health risks.
Tudi najmanjša izpostavljenost rakotvornim snovem, ki jih vsebuje tobačni dim, lahko povzroči razvoj tumorjev.
Even the slightest exposure to the carcinogens present in tobacco smoke can lead to the development of tumours.
Sistem umetnega prezračevanja ne ščiti učinkovito pred tobačnim dimom, saj tudi najmodernejši prezračevalni sistemi ne morejo popolnoma odstraniti škodljivih sestavin iz zraka v prostoru.
Ventilation devices do not offer adequate protection from tobacco smoke, as even the most modern ventilation systems cannot fully remove the dangerous ingredients from the air.
Vse vodilne zdravstvene organizacije, med njimi Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija s svojo Mednarodno agencijo za raziskave raka, so dale jasna priporočila glede politike za zaščito pred kompleksno strupeno mešanico, ki sestavlja tobačni dim.
All leading health organisations, including the World Health Organisation with its International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), have issued clear recommendations for a policy of protection from the complex mixture of toxins of which tobacco smoke consists.
Določile so tudi naslednja načela za dodatne ukrepe: zdravi zaprti prostori so le tisti, ki so popolnoma brez tobačnega dima, noben prezračevalni sistem ne ščiti dovolj pred genotoksičnimi rakotvornimi snovmi, prav tako je neučinkovita določitev prostorov za kadilce.
They lay down the following principles for additional measures: only 100% smoke-free indoor environments are healthy environments; no ventilation system can provide full protection from genotoxic carcinogens, and neither can specific smoking areas.
Vsem ljudem je treba omogočiti, da na svojih delovnih mestih, v zaprtih prostorih in v javnih prostorih delajo v okolju brez tobačnega dima.
Everyone should be able to work in a smoke-free environment, indoors and in public buildings.
Zato je nujno potrebna zakonodaja, saj so se vsi prostovoljni dogovori vedno izkazali za neučinkovite.
Legislation is needed in this respect as all voluntary arrangements have repeatedly proven to be ineffective.
o posledicah pogodbe med državami članicami Skupnosti in podjetjem Philip Morris o stopnjevanju boja proti goljufijam in tihotapljenju cigaret ter napredku, ki je bil dosežen pri izvajanju priporočil parlamentarnega preiskovalnega odbora za tranzit
on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System
– ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila z dne 13. marca 1997
– having regard to its recommendation of 13 March 1997
UL C 115, 14.4.1997, str.
OJ C 115, 14.4.1997, p.
157. , ob odobritvi poročila preiskovalnega odbora Evropskega parlamenta za tranzitni sistem Skupnosti in svojih 38 priporočil,
157. endorsing the report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Community transit system and its 38 recommendations,
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma proti tihotapljenju in ponarejanju, ki so ga Komisija in 10 držav članic sklenile s podjetjem Philip Morris International 9. julija 2004,
– having regard to the anti-contraband and anti-counterfeit agreement between the Commission, 10 Member States and Philip Morris International of 9 July 2004,
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 11/2006 o tranzitnem sistemu Skupnosti z odgovori Komisije
– having regard to the European Court of Auditors' Special report No 11/2006 on the Community transit system, together with the Commission's replies
UL C 44, 27.2.2007, str.
OJ C 44, 27.2.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A6‑0337),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0337/2007 ),
A. ker tranzitni sistem Skupnosti omogoča gibanje blaga Skupnosti in blaga, ki ni iz Skupnosti, ter se uvaža iz tretjih držav ali izvaža vanje, na vsem ozemlju EU z začasno odpravo carin in drugih dajatev pred prihodom blaga v končni namembni kraj,
A. whereas the Community transit system facilitates the movement of Community goods and of non-Community goods imported from or exported to third countries throughout the territory of the EU by temporarily suspending customs duties and other taxes until the goods reach their final destination,
B. ker je Evropski parlament po rezultatih preiskovalnega odbora s podporo Sveta in Evropskega računskega sodišča za preprečevanje goljufij priporočil računalniško voden tranzit, da se pregleda pravni okvir ter da Komisija in države članice izboljšajo fizične preglede, ki temeljijo na skupni analizi tveganja,
B. whereas, following the Committee of Inquiry's results, the European Parliament, supported by the Council and the European Court of Auditors, had recommended that, in order to prevent fraud, transit movements be computerised, the legal framework be revised and the Commission and the Member States improve physical checks based on common risk analysis,
C. ker je ta prvi preiskovalni odbor Evropskega parlamenta uspešno prenesel vprašanje tranzita iz administrativnega zakulisja na politično prizorišče, sprožil hiter odziv zainteresiranih strani in dokazal, da imajo lahko preiskovalni odbori bistveno dodano vrednost v političnem postopku ter da koristijo državljanom EU,
C. whereas this first Committee of Inquiry of the European Parliament succeeded in bringing the issue of transit out of the administrative undergrowth into the political arena, triggered a shift in response from stakeholders and proved that committees of inquiry can have substantial added value in the political process and bring benefit to EU citizens,
2. ugotavlja, da novi računalniški tranzitni sistem (NCTS) kljub znatnim zamudam od januarja 2006 deluje v vseh državah članicah, čeprav se delovanje po posameznih državah članicah razlikuje; meni, da je to velika sprememba v primerjavi s starim postopkom v zastareli papirni obliki; ugotavlja, da je Komisija s tehničnega vidika izvajanje novega računalniškega tranzitnega sistema uspešno usklajevala;
Notes that, despite substantial delays, the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS) has been operational in all Member States since January 2006, although performance varies from Member State to Member State; considers this an enormous change compared to the old archaic paper-based procedure; notes that, from a technical point of view, the Commission coordinated the implementation of the NCTS in the Member States successfully;
4. zaskrbljen je zaradi številnih slabosti, ki jih je Sodišče ugotovilo pri uporabi revidiranega pravnega okvira, zlasti glede preverjanja poenostavitev postopkov, preiskav in izterjav; ugotavlja, da je Sodišče predstavilo podroben seznam pomanjkljivosti in zadevne države članice (glej prilogo 1 posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 11/2006);
Is worried about the numerous weaknesses the Court found in Member States' application of the revised legal framework, in particular with regard to the verification of procedure simplifications, enquiries and recoveries; notes that the Court presented a detailed list of shortcomings and Member States concerned (see Annex 1 of the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No. 11/2006);
6. poziva Komisijo, da sproži postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državam članicam, kadar napake v zvezi z računi B niso enkratne, ampak sistematične in strukturne; je zadovoljen, ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v zadnjih dveh letih po uvedbi postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki jih je sprožila Komisija proti nekaterim državam članicam, izreklo številne pomembne sodbe, ki potrjujejo razlago pravil s strani Komisije; meni, da je treba ustrezno delovanje sistema računov A in B ponovno obravnavati po letu 2009;
Calls on the Commission to start infringement procedures against Member States whenever errors with regard to the B account are not one-off, but systematic and structural; is satisfied that, over the last two years, following infringement procedures brought by the Commission against several Member States, the European Court of Justice has delivered a number of important judgements confirming the Commission's interpretation of the rules; is of the opinion that the proper functioning of the system of A and B accounts needs to be reconsidered after 2009;