natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Čeprav se tak primer še ni pojavil, Sodišče meni, da je treba njegov statut spremeniti, da bi se lahko jezikovna ureditev uporabljala za novi revizijski postopek.
Although this possibility has not yet arisen, the Court of Justice has nevertheless taken the view that its Rules of Procedure need to be amended to enable it to apply its language arrangements to the new review procedure.
Sprememba poslovnika z uvedbo člena 123a v Naslov IVa določa, da revizijski postopek poteka v jeziku odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje, ki je predmet postopka.
The amendment to the Rules of Procedure, in the form of an Article 123a to be inserted in Title IVa, stipulates that proceedings will be conducted in the language of the particular decision (i.e. of the Court of First Instance) being reviewed.
Predlagana določba je tako skladna z določbo iz člena 110 poslovnika Sodišča o pritožbah zoper odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje.
The provision being proposed is thus similar to the provision set out in Article 110 of the Rules of Procedure concerning appeals against decisions of the Court of First Instance.
Zato poročevalka odobri predlog sklepa Sveta.
That being the case, the rapporteur endorses the draft Council decision.
Predlog sklepa Sveta o spremembi poslovnika Sodišča za določitev jezikovne ureditve, ki se uporablja za revizijski postopek
Amendment of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice to specify the language rules which are to apply to the review procedure
o vplivu kohezijske politike na vključevanje ranljivih skupnosti in skupin
on the impact of cohesion policy on the integration of vulnerable communities and groups
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................12
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT...13
– ob upoštevanju členov 87(3), 137 in 158 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Articles 87(3), 137 and 158 of the EC Treaty,
UL L 239, 01.09.2006, str.
OJ L 239, 1.9.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. julija 2005 z naslovom „Kohezijska politika za podporo rasti in novim delovnim mestom: strateške smernice skupnosti za obdobje 2007–2013 ( KOM(2005)0299 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 July 2005 entitled Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013 ( COM(2005)0299 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 9. februarja 2005 o socialni agendi ( KOM(2005)0033 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 9 February 2005 on the Social Agenda ( COM(2005)0033 )
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 17. maja 2005 z naslovom „Tretje poročilo o napredku glede kohezije: k novemu partnerstvu za rast, delovna mesta in kohezijo“ ( KOM(2005)0192 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 17 May 2005 entitled Third progress report on cohesion: Towards a new partnership for growth, jobs and cohesion ( COM(2005)0192 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 12. junija 2006 z naslovom „Strategija za rast in delovna mesta ter reforma evropske kohezijske politike: četrto poročilo o napredku glede kohezije“ ( KOM(2006)0281 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 12 July 2006 entitled 'The Growth and Jobs Strategy and the Reform of European Cohesion Policy: Fourth progress report on cohesion' ( COM(2006)0281 ),
– ob upoštevanju teritorialne agende EU in leipziške listine o trajnostnih evropskih mestih ter prvega akcijskega programa za izvajanje teritorialne agende Evropske unije,
– having regard to the Territorial Agenda of the EU, the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities, and the First Action Programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju, da Komisija pripravlja zeleno knjigo o ozemeljski koheziji,
– having regard to the preparation by the Commission of the Green paper on Territorial Cohesion,
– ob upoštevanju poročila evropskega omrežja za spremljanje prostorskega razvoja (ESPON) z naslovom „Prihodnost ozemlja – teritorialni scenariji za Evropo“ in poročila Evropskega parlamenta „Regionalna neskladja in kohezija: strategije za prihodnost?“,
– having regard to the report by the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) entitled Territorial Futures – Spatial scenarios for Europe and that of the European Parliament entitled Regional Disparities and Cohesion: what Strategies for the Future?
– ob upoštevanju členov 3, 13 in 141 Pogodbe ES, ki države članice zavezujejo, da zagotavljajo enake možnosti za vse državljane,
– having regard to Articles 3, 13 and 141 of the EC Treaty, which require the Member States to ensure equal opportunities for all citizens,
– – ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 31. januarja 2008 o evropski strategiji za Rome
– having regard to its resolution of 31 January 2008 on a European strategy on the Roma
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2008)0035 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0035 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenja Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0212/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6-0212/2008 ),
A. ker člen 158 Pogodbe ES določa, da je cilj Skupnosti med drugim pospešiti skladni ekonomski in socialni razvoj v vsej Skupnosti ter zmanjšati družbeno-gospodarsko neskladje med posameznimi regijami,
A. whereas one of the Community's goals, as laid down in Article 158 of the EC Treaty, is to promote harmonious economic and social development across the whole of the Community and reduce socio-economic disparities between individual regions,
B. ker se neskladje lahko pojavi v regijah in med njimi,
B. Whereas disparities may arise within as well as between regions,
C. ker je obravnava družbenih, gospodarskih in ozemeljskih neskladij med uspešnejšimi in najrevnejšimi regijami še vedno prednostni cilj kohezijske politike in ker njen obseg ne bi smel biti omejen zgolj na podporo pri doseganju ciljev drugih strategij, saj bi to oviralo ekonomsko, socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo,
C. whereas addressing social, economic and territorial disparities between the more prosperous and the poorest regions remains the underlying objective of cohesion policy and whereas its scope should therefore not be reduced to supporting other strategies' objectives, which could hamper economic, social and territorial cohesion,
D. ker je bil prispevek kohezijske politike do sedaj uspešen, saj je pomagala najrevnejšim regijam pri zmanjševanju razkoraka v družbeno-gospodarskem razvoju,
D. whereas, cohesion policy has, up to now, made an effective contribution in helping the poorest regions to reduce the gap in terms of socio-economic development,
E. ker se cele države še vedno spoprijemajo s precejšnjimi izzivi pri svojem razvoju in ni verjetno, da bo do konvergence prišlo v sedanjem okviru 2007–2013,
E. whereas entire countries still face considerable challenges to their development and convergence is unlikely to occur within the current framework 2007-2013,
F. ker je v nekaterih državah članicah gospodarska rast najizrazitejša v okolici glavnih mest in velikih urbanih središč držav in regij, zaradi česar se druga območja srečujejo z neenakomernim družbeno-gospodarskim razvojem ter se veča ranljivost družbenih skupnosti in skupin na teh območjih,
F. whereas in some Member States economic growth is concentrated around national and regional capital cities and large urban centres, leaving other areas with uneven socio-economic development and aggravating the vulnerability of social communities and groups within these areas,
G. ker lizbonska pogodba ozemeljsko kohezijo navaja kot enega od ciljev Evropske unije, pri čemer je pristojnost na tem področju razdeljena med Unijo in države članice,
G. whereas the Lisbon Treaty lists territorial cohesion as one of the EU's objectives and provides for shared competence between the Union and the Member States in this area,
H. ker je pojem „ranljive skupnosti“ zelo širok in ni jasnih meril, po katerih bi ga opredelili,
H. whereas the concept of "vulnerable community" is very broad and there are no clear criteria for defining it,
I. ker številni predeli še vedno čudijo negativne posledice zaradi oddaljenosti in neugodnega geografskega položaja ter nimajo potrebne infrastrukture za resnične razvojne možnosti, s katerimi bi dosegle povprečno stopnjo razvoja v Evropski uniji,
I. whereas many territories still suffer the ill effects of remoteness and of their geographical disadvantages and lack the necessary infrastructure for real development opportunities for catching up with the average level of development in the EU,
J. ker bo izboljšanje prometne infrastrukture in dostopa do prevoza pomagalo povečati dostop do odročnih regij, obenem pa omiliti izključenost skupnosti in skupin na teh odročnih območjih, in ker se bo z izboljšanjem storitev splošnega interesa, zlasti izobraževanja, izboljšalo življenje ranljivih skupin in skupnosti,
J. whereas improving transport infrastructure and access to transport will help to make isolated regions more accessible, while also alleviating the exclusion of communities and groups living in these remote areas, and whereas improving services of general interest, particularly education, will improve the lives of vulnerable groups and communities,
K. ker najrevnejše države in regije nimajo potrebnih finančnih virov, da bi zagotovile lasten prispevek k sredstvom Skupnosti, do katerih so upravičene, in ker poleg tega na teh območjih zelo pogosto ni upravnih zmogljivosti in človeških virov za učinkovito uporabo dodeljenih sredstev,
K. whereas the poorest countries and regions lack the necessary financial resources to provide their own contribution to the Community funding for which they are eligible and, moreover, most often lack the administrative capacity and human resources to make good use of the funding granted,
L. ker politika za razvoj podeželja močno vpliva na ozemlje in bi jo bilo zato treba bolje uskladiti z regionalno politiko, da bi spodbudili njuno sinergijo in dopolnjevanje ter upoštevali prednosti in slabosti ponovne vključitve teh politik,
L. whereas, due to its strong territorial impact, it is necessary to better coordinate rural development policy with regional policy in order to foster synergies and complementarities between these policies and to consider the advantages and disadvantages of reintegrating these policies,
M. ker ni ustreznih in primerljivih mikroregionalnih statističnih podatkov za regije Evropske unije, v katerih živijo ranljive skupnosti in skupine,
M. whereas there is a lack of available and comparable micro-regional statistical data for the regions of the EU where vulnerable communities and groups live,
N. ker je za revščino in izključenost značilna močna ozemeljska pogojenost,
N. whereas poverty and exclusion have a strong territorial character,
O. ker se večina najbolj zapostavljenih mikroregionalnih območij srečuje s zapletenimi večdimenzionalnimi težavami zaradi njihove obrobne lege, slabe dostopnosti, pomanjkanja osnovne infrastrukture, nezadostnega družbeno-gospodarskega razvoja, trenda propadanja industrije, nizke stopnje izobrazbe in usposobljenosti, pomanjkanja upravnih zmogljivosti, visoke stopnje brezposelnosti, vse slabših stanovanjskih in življenjskih pogojev, težke dostopnosti storitev splošnega pomena, pomanjkljivih pogojev za tehnološki razvoj in napredek ter velikega števila pripadnikov oddvojenih manjšin in ranljivih skupin,
O. whereas most of the least favoured micro-regional territories are facing complex multi-dimensional problems relating to their peripheral location, reduced accessibility, lack of basic infrastructure, socio-economic under-development, tendency to de-industrialisation, low levels of education and training, lack of administrative capacity, high levels of unemployment, deteriorating housing and living conditions, difficult access to services of general interest, lack of conditions for technological development and progress and large populations of segregated minorities and vulnerable groups,
1. poudarja, da sta ozemeljska koncentracija ranljivih skupnosti in skupin ter socialna izključenost, ki prizadene najmanj razvite regije, vse večji izziv za kohezijo v Evropski uniji; poleg tega poudarja, da tega pojava ne najdemo le med regijami v nerazvitih območjih, temveč v veliki meri tudi znotraj regij, na razvitih in razvijajočih se območjih, ter da zahteva posebno pozornost, saj ranljive skupnosti in skupine pogosto niso opazne v splošnejši, ugodni širši sliki;
Stresses that the territorial concentration of vulnerable communities and groups and the social exclusion affecting the most underdeveloped regions is an increasing challenge to cohesion in the EU; emphasises, moreover, that this phenomenon is not only inter-regional in underdeveloped areas but also intra-regional, to a significant extent, in both developing and developed areas, and requires particular attention because such vulnerable communities and groups tend to lose visibility within a more general, favourable picture;
6. v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da je ranljive skupine mogoče najti v vseh regijah, celo v uspešnejših, in da bi jih bilo treba upoštevati pri celostnem pristopu;
Notes, in this regard, that vulnerable groups may exist in all regions, even the more prosperous ones, and that an integrated approach should take such groups into account;
11. poziva, da je treba nadaljevati dejavnosti ustvarjanja dohodka na podeželju in posebno pozornost nameniti družinskim ter malim in srednjim kmetijam – pri čemer bi bilo treba pregledati skupno kmetijsko politiko in jo oblikovati pravičneje – ter nekmetijskim podjetniškim dejavnostim, ki zagotavljajo blago in storitve, bistvene za ohranjanje prebivalstva in privabljanje novih prebivalcev;
Calls for the continuance of income-generating activities in rural areas, for which purpose particular attention should be devoted to family farming and to small and medium-sized farmers, with the CAP being revised in order to make it fairer, as well as to non-agricultural entrepreneurial activities which supply goods and services that are essential to maintaining the population and welcoming new arrivals;
14. poziva Komisijo, naj v zeleni knjigi o ozemeljski koheziji, ki je v pripravi, predstavi cilj in jasno definicijo ozemeljske kohezije, merila, ki jo določajo, in njene instrumente, vključno s sredstvi za doseganje ozemeljskih ciljev;
Calls on the Commission to present, in the framework of the forthcoming Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, an objective for and a clear definition of territorial cohesion, the criteria determining it, its instruments and the means available for achieving territorial targets;
17. poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru zelene knjige o ozemeljski koheziji preuči, ali je raven NUTS 4 primerna za izvajanje diferenciranih političnih ukrepov za dosego cilja ozemeljske kohezije;
Urges the Commission to examine, in the framework of the Green Paper on territorial cohesion, whether the NUTS 4 level would be appropriate for pursing a differentiated policy to achieve the objective of territorial cohesion;
20. poudarja, da bi bilo treba po letu 2013 ohraniti strukturne politike, poleg tega pa pregled izvrševanja proračuna uporabiti kot možnost, da bodo v prihodnje zagotovljena potrebna sredstva za ekonomsko, socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo med regijami in državami Evropske unije;
Stresses that not only structural policies should be retained after 2013, but that the budgetary review should be used as an opportunity to ensure that the necessary resources are made available in order to guarantee economic, social and territorial cohesion among regions and countries in the EU in the future;
Kohezijska politika je ena od najpomembnejših prednostnih nalog Evropske unije.
Cohesion policy is one of the most important priorities of the European Union.
Cilj te politike, katere finančni okvir znaša eno tretjino proračuna EU in ki bolj kot katera koli druga politika temelji na načelu solidarnosti, je zmanjševanje gospodarskih, socialnih in ozemeljskih razlik med državami članicami in njihovimi 268 regijami.
With a financial envelop amounting 1/3 of the EU budget, this policy based more than any other policy on the principle of solidarity is intended to reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the Member States and their 268 regions.
Kljub temu so te razlike še vedno pomembne.
Nevertheless, those disparities still remain important.
Upoštevati je treba, da je v vsaki četrti regiji BDP na prebivalca nižji od 75 % povprečja Evropske unije in da se tudi znotraj regij pojavljajo znatna neravnovesja.
We have to bear in mind that one region in four has a GDP per inhabitant under 75% of the average of the European Union and that there are also important imbalances appearing within regions.
Več evropskih analiz, rezultati programa ESPON 2006, kohezijska poročila in strateške pobude opozarjajo na dejstvo, da je socialna izključenost prostorsko osredotočena na najbolj nerazvitih območjih.
Several European analyses, the results of the ESPON 2006 programme, the Cohesion Reports and the strategic initiatives draw attention to the fact that social exclusion is concentrated spatially in the most underdeveloped areas.
S tem poročilom bi radi opozorili, da je družbena segregacija ranljivih skupin povezana s prostorskimi pogoji, in poudarili, kako pomembno je te procese odkriti in jih obravnavati z ustreznim območnim pristopom.
The aim of the report is to draw the attention to the spatial inter-linkage system of segregation, vulnerable groups and to underline the importance of the identification and territorial approach-based treatment of these processes.
To pomeni, da moramo vprašanje ranljivih skupnosti in skupin obravnavati kot del ozemeljske kohezije.
Therefore, the issue of vulnerable communities and groups should be addressed in the context of the territorial cohesion.
Namen tega poročila je poudariti, da bomo ozemeljsko pogojeno izključenost obvladali samo, če bomo doumeli in si priznali, da glavne težave izvirajo iz mikroozemeljskega razvoja.
The document intends to highlight that in order to cope with territorial exclusion it is necessary to identify and recognize that the main problems are rooted in micro-territorial development.
Kljub temu pa ugotavljamo, da je v opravljenih ozemeljskih analizah na evropski ravni in v sedanjem evropskem statističnem sistemu komaj najti kakšen ustrezen podatek.
However, there is hardly any information on European level to be found in territorial analyses prepared so far and in the current European system of statistics.
Prehod od revščine k izključenosti
Shift from poverty to exclusion
Ranljive skupine se srečujejo z večdimenzionalnimi težavami, ki še povečujejo revščino ter sprožajo izključenost in vse večjo segregacijo.
Vulnerable groups are facing multi-dimensional problems through which poverty deepens and it takes up the form of exclusion and increasing segregation.
Daljša neaktivnost in dolgotrajna brezposelnost še zmanjšujeta možnosti vseh prizadetih, da bi obvladali socialno izključenost in gospodarske težave, v katerih so se znašli.
Prolonged inactivity and long-term unemployment reduces the capacity of those affected to overcome their social exclusion and economic difficulties.
Izključenost je močno prostorsko pogojena
Exclusion has a strong spatial character
Izključenost iz procesa gospodarskega in družbenega razvoja je večinoma prostorsko pogojena in vezana na izključenost določenega ozemlja, zaradi česar ranljive skupine lahko le omejeno dostopajo do dela in storitev.
Exclusion from the flow of economic and social development mostly appears spatially and is inter-related with territorial exclusion; therefore the access of the vulnerable groups to work and services is lower.
Življenjske možnosti družbenih skupin so vezane na prostor, v katerem te skupine bivajo, tj. od regij ali mikroregij, oziroma, splošno rečeno, od življenjskega okolja.
The living prospects of social groups are determined by their geographical location: regions, micro-regions concerned and most generally by their living environment.
Vpliv prostora na izključenost je torej zelo velik.
The spatial determination of the risk of being excluded is therefore very strong.
Pojav na mikroregionalni ravni
The phenomenon appears on micro-regional level
Poudarimo naj, da se ta družbeno in gospodarsko ogrožena območja pojavljajo zlasti na obrobnih območjih znotraj regij ali v zaostajajočih mikroregijah ter jih v večini primerov ni mogoče zaznati na ravni NUTS 2.
It is important to highlight that these social and economic crises areas are mostly emerging in peripheral intra-regional areas or in micro-regions lagging behind and in most of the cases they can not be grasped at NUTS 2 level.
Prav bi torej bilo, da se pojav prostorsko pogojenih ranljivih skupnosti preuči – če uporabimo terminologijo Unije – ne na ravni NUTS 2, pač pa na ravneh LAU 1 in LAU 2.
Therefore, the emergence of spatially determined vulnerable communities should be examined - relying on EU terminology - not on NUTS 2 levels, but on LAU1 and LAU 2 levels.
Družbena segregacija tudi na podeželskih območjih
Segregation also in rural areas
V mestih so procesi družbene segregacije povezani z nastajanjem predmestij, kar povzroča propadanje tradicionalnih mestnih središč in nekdaj industrializiranega obrobja.
In urban areas the segregation processes are inter-related with the flow of suburbanization which results in the decline of traditional city centres and desindustrialized peripheries.
Ob mestnih getih pa sočasno prihaja do koncentracije družbenih napetosti na tistih podeželskih območjih, kjer zaostajajo za razvojem.
Meanwhile, beside urban ghettos, in rural areas lagging behind, social tensions are much more concentrated in lagging behind rural areas.
V vse bolj neugodnem položaju je podeželsko prebivalstvo v novih državah članicah, kjer je gospodarska tranzicija še poglobila razlike znotraj regij.
Rural population suffers from a very disadvantaged situation in the new member states where the economic transition has strengthened the intra-regional disparities.
Težava je prikrita: manjkajoči instrumenti
The problem is hidden: Missing instruments
Pojava ozemeljske izključenosti pa ustrezno ne obravnava niti evropska statistika niti politični instrumenti.
The phenomenon of territorial exclusion here is neither sufficiently covered by European statistics, nor by policy instruments.
Družbene skupine, ki so prizadete tudi zaradi ozemeljsko pogojene izključenosti, so v prostorski analizi, načrtovanju ukrepov in pri oblikovanju politike prikrite.
Those groups of society affected also by territorial exclusion are hidden for the spatial analysis, action planning and decision-makers as well.
Proces namreč poteka na nižji ravni manjših ozemeljskih enot, zato jih s sedanjimi načini spremljanja na ravni NUTS 2, npr. z zbiranjem podatkov s strani Eurostata ali sistematično analizo na podlagi programa ESPON, na evropski ravni ni mogoče zaznati.
These processes happen at lower territorial levels; this is why the present observatory means at NUTS 2 level, such as data collection by EUROSTAT or the systematic analyses of the ESPON programme are not capable of identifying them on a European scale.
Splošno uporabljeni in ustrezni ozemeljski kazalniki niso na voljo.
There are no generally applied, suitable territorial indicators.
Kot je razvidno iz analize, predstavljene v tem poročilu, s sedanjim statističnim sistemom ni mogoče opraviti takšne analize razlik znotraj regij NUTS 2, ki bi bila primerljiva po vsej Uniji.
As the results of our analysis presented in this report, the current system of statistics is not capable of producing an analysis of intra-regional disparities within NUTS 2 regions that would be comparable EU-wide.
Kazalniki, ki merijo razlike med statističnimi teritorialnimi enotami, niso sposobni pokazati dejanskih razlik znotraj regij.
Indicators measuring disparities of the territorial statistical units are not able to show the real intra-regional disparities at all.