natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če bi predlagane spremembe k modulaciji privedle do zmanjšanja sredstev, namenjenih programom za razvoj podeželja v eni ali več državah članicah, bi bilo to nesmiselno, saj je glavni cilj povečanje razpoložljivih sredstev zaradi soočanja z novimi okoljskimi izzivi.
It would be perverse if the proposed changes to modulation led to a funding cut in the rural development programmes of one or more Member States, when the overriding objective was to increase the amount of available funds to address the new environmental challenges.
Ta varovalna klavzula je torej potrebna zaradi vseh parametrov, ki določajo skupni donos modulacije.
This safeguard is therefore necessary given the complex set of parameters which determine the overall modulation yield.
Člen 133 a (novo)
Article 133 a (new)
Člen 133 a
Article 133a
Študija o stroških usklajevanja zakonodaje
Study on costs of compliance
Komisija izvede študijo, ki ocenjuje sedanje stroške kmetov, ki izhajajo iz usklajevanja z zakonodajo EU na področju okolja, dobrega počutja živali in varne hrane, ter ki presegajo standarde, določene za uvožene proizvode.
The Commission shall execute a study assessing the actual costs for farmers stemm ing from complying with Community legislation in the fields of environment, animal welfare and food safety, and which go beyond the standards that import products are subject to.
Ta zakonodaja med drugim zadeva uredbe in direktive iz priloge II, ki so osnova sistema navzkrižne skladnosti, ter standarde iz priloge III, ki določajo dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje, ki so tudi del sistema.
This legislation concerns among others the regulations and directive s of Annex II underpinning the cross-c ompliance system, as we ll as the standards defined as good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC) in Annex III which is also part of the cross c ompliance requirements.
Le Parlement européen a affirmé à plusieurs reprises sa position (T6-0598/2007 et T6‑0093/2008) selon laquelle les paiements directs devraient être rationalisés encore davantage après 2013 en subordonnant leur volume aux coûts réels exposés pour se conformer à la législation de l'Union européenne, plus stricte que les normes s'appliquant aux produits importés.
The European Parliament repeatedly voiced its position (T6-0598/2007and T6-0093/2008) that direct payments should be further rationalised after 2013 by making the height of these payments dependent on the actual costs of compliance with EU legislation that goes beyond the standards that import products are subject to.
Les conclusions de l'étude pilote peuvent servir de base à la mise en œuvre d'une rationalisation des paiements agricoles après 2013.
The results of the pilot can serve as a basis for putting into practice a rationalisation of agricultural payments after 2013.
Par ailleurs, ces conclusions permettront à l'Union européenne de justifier ses paiements agricoles dans le cadre de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce, ainsi que vis-à-vis de ses propres citoyens.
Moreover, the results will help the EU to justify its agricultural payments within the framework of the WTO, as well as to its own citizens.
Priloga I – Stročnice – stolpec "Pravna podlaga"
Annex I – Protein crops – ‘Legal base’ column
Naslov IV, poglavje 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003
Title IV, Chapter 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003
Naslov IV, poglavje 1 oddelek 1a te uredbe
Title IV, Chapter 1, Section 1a of this Regulation
Priloga II – točka A – podtočka 4
Annex II – point A – subpoint 4
Direktiva Sveta 91/676/EGS z dne 12. decembra 1991 o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov (UL L 375, 31.12.1991, str.
Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p.
Člena 4 in 5
Articles 4 and 5
Priloga II – točka A a (novo)
Annex II – point A a (new)
Varnost pri delu
Workplace safety
Direktiva Sveta 89/391/EGS z dne 12. junija 1989 o uvajanju ukrepov za spodbujanje izboljšav varnosti in zdravja delavcev pri delu (UL L 183, 29.6.1989, str.
Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p.
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/54/ES z dne 18. septembra 2000 o varovanju delavcev pred tveganji zaradi izpostavljenosti biološkim dejavnikom pri delu (sedma posebna direktiva v smislu člena 16(1) Direktive 89/391/EGS) (UL L 262, 17.10.2000, str.
Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work (seventh individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (OJ L 262, 17.10.2000, p.
Členi 3, 6, 8 in 9
Articles 3, 6, 8 and 9
Direktiva Sveta 94/33/ES z dne 22. junija 1994 o varstvu mladih ljudi pri delu (UL L 216, 20.8.1994, str.
Council Directive 94/33/EC of 22 June 1994 on the protection of young people at work (OJ L 216, 20.8.1994, p.
Členi 3 in 4 do 12
Article 3 and 4 to 12
To je zgolj posledica vključitve varnosti pri delu med predpisane zahteve ravnanja.
Simple consequence of the inclusion of workplace safety among the statutory management requirements.
Priloga III – stolpec 2 – naslov
Annex III – column 2 – heading
Primeri ustreznih zahtev
Examples of relevant requirements
Standardni bi morali biti le smernice in ne bi smeli predstavljati obveznosti za države članice, da bi se ohranila določena fleksibilnost na nacionalni in regionalni ravni.
Standards should only serve as guidelines and should not be proposed to the Member States as binding requirements, since national and regional flexibility is essential.
Priloga III – vrsta 4 – stolpec 2 – alinea 3
Annex III – line 4 – column 2 – indent 3
– Ohranjanje krajinskih značilnosti, vključno, če je potrebno, z živimi mejami, ribniki, jarki, drevesi (v vrsti, skupini ali posamično) in poljskimi mejnimi pasovi,
- Retention of landscape features, including, where appropriate, hedges, ponds, ditches, trees in line, in group or isolated and field margins,
– Ohranjanje krajinskih značilnosti
- Retention of landscape features,
Priloga III – vrsta 4 – stolpec 2 – alinea 5
Annex III – line 4 – column 2 – indent 5
– Vzdrževanje oljčnih nasadov in trte v dobrem rastnem stanju
- Maintenance of olive groves and vines in good vegetative condition
– Vzdrževanje oljčnih nasadov v dobrem rastnem stanju
- Maintenance of olive groves in good vegetative condition
Priloga III – vrsta 5 – stolpec 2 – alinea 1
Annex III – line 5 – column 2 – indent 1
– Vzpostavitev varovalnih pasov vzdolž vodnih tokov
– Establishment of buffer strips along water courses,
– Vzpostavitev varovalnih pasov vzdolž vodnih tokov skladno z ustrezno skupno zakonodajo o varstvu površinskih voda
– Establishment of buffer strips along water courses in accordance with relevant common legislation on the protection of surface water ,
v milijonih evrov
million EUR
Prilogo je treba revidirati zaradi upoštevanja predlogov sprememb Evropskega parlamenta.
This annex must be revised in the light of Parliament’s amendments.
2016 in naslednja leta
2016 and subsequent years
Preglednica 2 *
Table 2 *
* Zgornje meje so izračunane ob upoštevanju razporeda povečanj iz člena 110.
*Ceilings calculated taking account of the schedule of increments provided for under Article 110 .
Preglednica 2
Table 2
Priloga X – del I – alinea 2
Annex X – part I – indent 2
– od leta 2010 premija za stročnice iz poglavja 2 naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003;
– from 2010, the protein crop premium provided for in Chapter 2 of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003;
Z ukinitvijo vezane pomoči bi tvegali še večje zmanjšanje površin, na katerih se pridelujejo stročnice, kar lahko povzroči motnje v njihovi razpoložljivosti za živalsko krmo.
Abolishing coupled aid might speed up even further the reduction in the areas used to cultivate protein crops, possibly leading to shortages for animal feedingstuffs.
Priloga X – del I – alinea 3
Annex X – part I – indent 3
– od leta 2010 posebno plačilo za riž iz poglavja III naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in oddelka 1 poglavja 1 naslova IV te uredbe v skladu s časovnim razporedom iz člena 72(2) te uredbe;
– from 2010 the crop specific payment for rice provided for in Chapter III of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Section 1 of Chapter 1 of Title IV of this Regulation, in accordance with the time schedule provided for in Article 72(2) of this Regulation;
– od leta 2013 posebno plačilo za riž iz poglavja III naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in oddelka 1 poglavja 1 naslova IV te uredbe v skladu s časovnim razporedom iz člena 72(2) te uredbe;
– from 2013 the crop specific payment for rice provided for in Chapter III of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Section 1 of Chapter 1 of Title IV of this Regulation, in accordance with the time schedule provided for in Article 72(2) of this Regulation;
Vključitev v shemo enotnega plačila je možna šele od leta 2013 dalje.
Integration into the single payment scheme should take place as from 2013, and not before.
Priloga X – del I – alinea 5
Annex X – part I – indent 5
– od leta 2011 pomoč za predelavo posušene krme iz pododdelka I oddelka I poglavja IV naslova I dela II Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007;
– from 2011 the aid for processing dried fodder provided for in Subsection I of Section I of Chapter IV of Title I of Part II of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007;
Posušena krma spada v okvir skupne ureditve trga, ki je v postopku presoje, katere rezultati še niso znani.
Dried fodder is governed by a COM which is currently undergoing an assessment, whose results are not yet known.
Če se mora sektor prestrukturirati, da bi preživel, se v trenutnem kriznem položaju živalske proizvodnje zdi primerno zagotoviti, da se ohrani ponudba beljakovinsko bogatih proizvodov.
Although the sector needs to restructure in order to survive, given the current crisis in livestock production a supply of protein-rich products needs to be guaranteed.
Priloga X – del I – alinea 6
Annex X – part I – indent 6
– od leta 2011 pomoč za predelavo lanu, gojenega za vlakna, iz pododdelka II oddelka I poglavja IV naslova I dela II Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 v skladu s časovnim razporedom iz navedenega pododdelka;
– from 2011 the aid for processing flax grown for fibre in Subsection II of Section I of Chapter IV of Title I of Part II of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, in accordance with the time schedule provided for in that subsection;
– od leta 2013 pomoč za predelavo lanu, gojenega za vlakna, iz pododdelka II oddelka I poglavja IV naslova I dela II Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 v skladu s časovnim razporedom iz navedenega pododdelka;
– from 2013 the aid for processing flax grown for fibre in Subsection II of Section I of Chapter IV of Title I of Part II of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, in accordance with the time schedule provided for in that subsection;
Komisija sama izvaja zelo pozitivno študijo skupne ureditve trga za lan in konopljo, torej ni razloga, da bi ta mehanizem zdaj ukinili.
The Commission itself has carried out a study which gives a very favourable assessment of the COM for flax and hemp, so that there is no reason to abolish the arrangement immediately.
Priloga X – del I – alinea 7
Annex X – part I – indent 7
– od leta 2011 premija za krompirjev škrob iz člena [95a] Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2004 in v skladu s časovnim razporedom iz člena 75 te uredbe, pomoč za škrobni krompir iz navedenega člena.
– from 2011 the potato starch premium provided for in Article [95a] of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2004 and, in accordance with the time schedule of Article 75 of this Regulation, the aid for starch potato provided in that Article.
– od leta 2013 premija za krompirjev škrob iz člena [95a] Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2004 in v skladu s časovnim razporedom iz člena 75 te uredbe, pomoč za škrobni krompir iz navedenega člena.
– from 2013 the potato starch premium provided for in Article [95a] of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2004 and, in accordance with the time schedule of Article 75 of this Regulation, the aid for starch potato provided in that Article.
Priloga X – del I a (novo)
Annex X – part I a (new)
Od leta 2010 za države članice, ki ne bodo pred tem sprejele odločitve iz člena 64(1) te uredbe:
From 2010, where a Member State does not take the decision re ferred to in Article 64(1) of this Regulation:
– premija za stročnice iz poglavja 2 naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003;
- the protein crop premium provided for in Chapter 2 of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003;
– posebna pomoč za riž iz poglavja 3 naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in oddelka 1 poglavja 1 naslova IV te uredbe v skladu s časovnim razporedom iz člena 72(2) te uredbe;
- the crop specific payment for rice provided for in Chapter III of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Section 1 of Chapter 1 of Title IV of this Regulation, in accordance with the time schedule provided for in Article 72(2) of this Regulation;
– pomoč za predelavo posušene krme iz pododdelka 1 oddelka 1 poglavja IV naslova I dela II Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007;
- the aid for processing dried fodder provided for in Subsection I of Section I of Chapter IV of Title I of Part II of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Priloga XI – razpredelnica "Posušena krma"
Annex XI – ‘Dried fodder’ table
Razpredelnica "Posušena krma" v celoti
‘Dried fodder’ table
Priloga XI – razpredelnica "Stročnice"
Annex XI – ‘Protein crops’ table
Razpredelnica "Stročnice" v celoti
‘Protein crops’ table
Priloga XI – razpredelnica "Riž"
Annex XI – ‘Rice’ table
stolpec 2010
Column 2010
stolpec 2011
Column 2011
stolpec 2012
Column 2012
Priloga XI – razpredelnica "Lan z dolgimi vlakni"
Annex XI – ‘Long fibre flax’ table
Priloga XI – razpredelnica "Pomoč za predelavo krompirj a v škrob"
Annex XI – ‘Potato starch processing aid’ table
Priloga XI – razpredelnica "Pomoč za pridelovalce krompirjevega škroba"
Annex XI – ‘Potato starch aid for growers’ table
SISTEMATSKI PREGLED: OZADJE
THE ORIGINS OF THE ‘HEALTH CHECK’
Reforma iz leta 2003, ki je bila potrebna zaradi neizogibne širitve proti Vzhodu in Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, je najbolj temeljita reforma skupne kmetijske politike do sedaj.
The 2003 reform (which was dictated essentially by the inevitability of eastward enlargement and by the WTO) was the most thorough one to which the CAP has so far been subjected.
Reforma, ki je bila na začetku zasnovana kot preprost pregled, opravljen na polovici izvajanja veljavnih mehanizmov za državno posredovanje v kmetijstvu, je resnično spremenila skupno kmetijsko politiko in uvedla številna nova načela:
The reform was originally intended merely as a mid-term review of the existing mechanisms for public intervention in agriculture but it ended up as an in-depth reform involving the introduction of a set of new principles:
– nevezanost pomoči na proizvedene količine, da bi se kmetije lažje usmerile glede na trg ter da bi se zmanjšalo izkrivljanje proizvodnje in trgov kmetijskih proizvodov;
- the principle of decoupling aid from the quantity produced with a view to improving market guidance for farmers and reducing distortions in agricultural production and trade;
– navzkrižna skladnost, ki nevezana plačila pogojuje s številnimi merili na področju okolja, javnega zdravja in dobrega počutja živali itd.;
- the principle of conditionality, pursuant which to which the coupled payments must comply with a list of requirements relating to the environment, public health, animal welfare and so on;
– skladnost s pravili Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, ker je končni cilj nevezanosti pomoči, da se omogoči vključitev spremenjene sheme plačila v "zeleno škatlo" kmetijskega sporazuma;
- the principle of compatibility with the WTO, insofar as the ultimate objective of aid-decoupling was to ensure that it was included in the Agricultural Agreement's ‘green box’;
– ponovna javna razdelitev pravic do plačila, ki ima posledice na dveh področjih: pri nevezanih enotnih plačilih in prenosu med dvema stebroma skupne kmetijske politike (med prvim stebrom – pomoči in trgi – v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) ter drugim stebrom – razvoj podeželja – v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP));
- the principle of public redistribution of payment entitlements, which has effects at two levels: within decoupled single payments and as a transfer between the two pillars of the CAP (aid and the markets, first pillar, covered by the EAGGF; rural development, second pillar, covered by the EAFRD):
– bolj prilagodljivo upravljanje skupne kmetijske politike z možnostjo, da države članice na različne načine uporabijo številne kazalce nove skupne kmetijske politike;
- the principle of flexibility in the running of the CAP, whereby the Member State are able to vary the way in which a set of parameters relating to the new CAP are applied;
– finančna disciplina – načelo, ki v prihodnje velja v finančnih perspektivah za obdobje 2006–2013, v skladu s katerim se je zaradi širitve zamrznil kmetijski proračun ter so se določile obvezne letne zgornje meje z možnostjo nadaljnjega linearnega zmanjševanja veljavne pomoči za ta namen;
- the principle of financial discipline (subsequently enshrined by means of the 2007-2013 Financial Perspective), pursuant to which – in response to the challenge of enlargement – the agricultural budget was frozen and annual ceilings were imposed, with the possibility of linear reductions in grant aid with a view to meeting that challenge;
– postopnost: reforma iz leta 2003 je bil prvi korak postopka z več stopnjami; ko so se določila osnovna načela (nevezanost, finančna disciplina in prilagodljivo upravljanje), je bila reforma referenca za nove sektorske spremembe od reform sredozemskega svežnja do reforme vinskega sektorja in pred kratkim celo sektorja bombaža.
- finally, the principle of progressivity: 2003 constituted the first decision concerning an open reform in stages, since once the basic principles had been launched (decoupling, financial discipline and the application of management flexibility) it provided reference for further sectoral changes (from the reforms to the so-called Mediterranean package to the reform of the wine sector and more recently the cotton sector).
Sistematski pregled je zadnja stopnja tega postopka reforme.
The ‘Health Check’ constitutes the final stage in the reform process.
POTREBA PO SKUPNI KMETIJSKI POLITIKI
THE NEED FOR A COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY
Skupna kmetijska politika je najbolj trajnostna, najbrž najbolje izpeljana in zagotovo najbolj kritizirana politika EU.
The CAP is paradoxically the most durable, probably the most successful and certainly the most criticised of European policies.
Zasnovana je bila pred skoraj 50 leti in sposobna, kot nobena druga, izpolnjevati cilje, ki so bili zastavljeni ob njenem nastanku.
It was devised almost half a century ago and more than any other policy it has been able to pursue the objectives which it was intended to meet.
Vendar pa so nadaljnje družbene, gospodarske, politične in okoljske spremembe v Evropi in po svetu zahtevale prilagoditve, ki so jo naredile vse bolj nerazumljivo v nekaterih družbenih sektorjih, kar je povezano predvsem z nepravičnostjo, ki jo je povzročila med kmeti, regijami in državami članicami, ko se je EU širila na vse bolj raznolika kmetijsko-podeželska območja;
However, on account of the successive social, economic, political and environmental changes which have occurred in Europe and the world, the policy has had to adapt to new circumstances and it has become increasingly misunderstood by certain sectors of society, particularly in view of the injustices to which it has given rise amongst farmers, regions and Member States as the EU has progressively expanded and encompassed increasing heterogeneous agricultural and rural areas.
Poročevalec ocenjuje, da nadaljnja skupna kmetijska politika ni le zaželena, temveč tudi nepogrešljiva za zagotavljanje konkurenčnosti evropskega kmetijstva na svetovnem trgu, varnosti dobave, kakovosti živil, trajnostnega varovanja okolja, rešitev za nove izzive, zlasti za podnebne spremembe in obnovljive vire energije, ter dinamičnega in raznolikega gospodarstva na podeželskih območjih v skladu s cilji, ponovno izrečenimi v lizbonski pogodbi.
The rapporteur takes the view that the continuation of a common agricultural policy is not only desirable; it is also a necessary condition for safeguarding the competitiveness of European agriculture on the global market, maintaining security of supply and food quality, achieving environmental sustainability, responding to new challenges (in particular those relating to climate change and renewable energy sources) and supporting a dynamic, diversified economy in rural areas, in line with the objectives restated in the Lisbon Treaty.
Sistematski pregled bi se lahko (po mnenju poročevalca pa bi se moral) obsežneje lotiti razprave o opredelitvi modela kmetijske politike, ki se bo uporabljal v obdobju po letu 2013.
The ‘Health Check’ could (and, in the rapporteur’s view, should) have dwelt more on the debate concerning the drawing up of an agricultural-policy model for the post-2013 period.
Žal se ta priložnost ni izkoristila.
The waste of such an opportunity is to be regretted.
Okvir, v katerem je želela Komisija oblikovati razpravo o sistematskem pregledu, iz katerega je izključila zlasti vprašanja o upravičenosti pomoči in opredelitvi meril za model nevezanih plačil, ki bi bil čim bolj usklajen, možnosti prilagoditve, ki bi se dodelila državam članicam, modulacija ali sofinanciranje, možnost „enotnega stebra“ pa tudi prostor za ureditev trgov v novi skupni kmetijski politiki bodo še toliko bolj otežili razpravo in sprejemanje odločitev v času reforme leta 2013, o kateri bo zagotovo tekla razprava od leta 2010/2011.
The boundary which the commission wished to place around the debate on the ‘health check’ (leaving out in particular topics such as the legitimacy of aid and the setting of parameters for as common a model as possible of decoupled payments, the degree of management flexibility which should be granted to the Member States, modulation vs co-financing, the possibility of a ‘single pillar’ and the role of market regulation within the new CAP) will complicate the debate and the decisions concerning the 2013 reform, discussions on which will have to begin in 2010/2011.
PRED L OGI POROČEVALCA
THE RAPPORTEUR’S PROPOSALS
Evropski parlament je težavam na področju kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja namenil posebno pozornost ter se zavezal k številnim pobudam in oblikoval več predlogov, katerih dober del je bil sprejet nedavno in za katere se zdi poročevalcu etično, da jih spoštuje v njihovih bistvenih vidikih.
The European Parliament has over time devoted particular attention to matters relating to agriculture and rural development, the outcome being countless initiatives and a multitude of proposals (many of which have very recently been adopted) which the rapporteur has the ethical duty to honour in essence.
Med najnovejšimi stališči Evropskega parlamenta o temah, ki so neposredno povezane s sistematskim pregledom, je treba omeniti naslednja poročila: Goeplovo poročilo o temi, obravnavani v tem mnenju
Prominent amongst the most recent expressions of the European Parliament’s views concerning matters directly related to the ‘health check’ are the Goepel report on the same topic
P6_TA(2008)093. , Jegglovo poročilo o mleku
P6_TA(2008) 093 , the Jeggle report on milk
P6_TA(2008)092. , Veraldijevo poročilo o mladih kmetih
P6_TA(2008) 092 , the Veraldi report on young farmers
P6_TA(2008)258. , Aylwardovo poročilo o sektorju ovčjereje in kozjereje
P6_TA(2008) 258 , the Aylward report on the sheep and goat sector
P6_TA(2008)310. ter Berlatovo poročilo o Skladu Skupnosti za tobak
P6_TA(2008) 310 and the Berlato report on the Community Tobacco Fund
Ob upoštevanju zgornjega besedila poročevalec predlaga Evropskemu parlamentu, naj predloge Komisije o sledečih uredbah spremeni na naslednji način.
In this connection the rapporteur is proposing that the European Parliament should adopt the following main amendments to the Commission proposals relating to: