natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(5) Zato je primerno, da pristojni organi uporabijo fleksibilnost iz Uredbe (ES) št. 852/2004, zlasti člen 5(2)(g) in (5) te uredbe, da bi se izognili nepotrebnemu obremenjevanju malih nosilcev dejavnosti.
(5) It is appropriate therefore that the competent authorities apply the flexibility provided for in Regulation (EC) No 852/2004, in particular Article 5(2)(g) and (5) thereof, in order to avoid undue burdens for small businesses.
(6) Ker se tako s spremembami Uredbe (ES) št. 852/2004 kot s spremembami Uredbe št. 11 namerava zmanjšati upravne obremenitve za nosilce dejavnosti, ne da bi se pri tem spremenil temeljni namen navedenih uredb, je primerno te spremembe združiti v eno samo uredbo –
(6) As the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 and that of Regulation No 11 have the common aim of reducing administrative burdens on businesses, without changing the underlying purpose of those Regulations, it is appropriate to combine these amendments in a single Regulation.
Uredba št. 11
Regulation No. 11
Člen 5 in člen 6 – odstavki 1, 2 in 3
Article 5 and Article 6 - paragraphs 1, 2 and 3
Uredba št. 11 se spremeni:
Regulation No 11 is amended as follows:
(1) Člen 5 se črta.
(1) Article 5 is deleted.
(2) Člen 6 se spremeni:
(2) Article 6 is amended as follows:
(a) v odstavku 1 se črtata peta in šesta alinea;
(a) In paragraph 1 the fifth and sixth indents are deleted;
(b) v odstavku 2 se črta tretji stavek;
(b) In paragraph 2, the third sentence is deleted.
(c) Odstavek 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(c) Paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
Od prevoznikov se ne zahtevajo novi dokumenti, kadar so v obstoječih dokumentih, kot so tovorni listi ali kateri koli drugi prevozni dokumenti, na voljo vsi podatki iz odstavka 1 in kadar ti obstoječi dokumenti v povezavi s sistemi evidentiranja in računovodskimi sistemi prevoznika omogočajo popolno kontrolo nad prevozninami in pogoji za prevoz, tako da se oblike diskriminacije iz člena 75(1) Pogodbe lahko odpravijo ali razveljavijo.“
Where existing documents such as consignment notes or any other transport document give all the details specified in paragraph 1 and, in conjunction with carriers’ recording and accounting systems, enable a full check to be made of transport rates and conditions, so that the forms of discrimination referred to in Article 75(1) of the Treaty may be thereby abolished or avoided, carriers shall not be required to introduce new documents."
Uredba št. 852/2004
Regulation No 852/2004
Člen 5 – odstavek 3
Article 5 - paragraph 3
Brez poseganja v druge zahteve te uredbe se odstavek 1 ne uporablja za nosilce dejavnosti , ki so mikropodjetja v smislu Priporočila Komisije 2003/361/ES z dne 6. maja 2003 , in katerih dejavnosti pretežno obsegajo neposredno prodajo živil končnemu potrošniku.
Without prejudice to the other requirements of this Regulation, paragraph 1 shall not apply to businesses which are micro-enterprises within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 and the activities of which consist predominantly in the direct sale of food to the final consumer.
Nosilci živilske dejavnosti so lahko brez poseganja v druge zahteve te uredbe oproščeni zahteve, da uvedejo, izvajajo in vzdržujejo stalen postopek ali postopke, ki temeljijo na načelih HACCP.
Without prejudice to the other requirements of this Regulation, food business operators may be exempted from the requirement to put in place, implement and maintain a permanent procedure or procedures based on the HACCP principles.
To bi moralo veljati samo za nosilce dejavnosti v smislu Priporočila Komisije 2003/361/ES z dne 6. maja 2003 (s posebnim poudarkom na mikropodjetjih), katerih dejavnosti pretežno obsegajo neposredno prodajo živil končnemu potrošniku , in pod pogojem, da pristojni organ na podlagi redne analize tveganj meni, da tveganja, ki bi jih bilo treba preprečiti, odpraviti ali zmanjšati na sprejemljivo raven, ne obstajajo ali da so ugotovljena tveganja v zadostni meri in redno nadzorovana z izvajanjem splošnih in posebnih zahtev v zvezi s higieno živil, določenih v členu 4(2) do (6).
This shall apply only to businesses within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 ( with a particular focus on micro-enterprises) and the activities of which consist predominantly in the direct sale of food to the final consumer, and provided the competent authority considers, on the basis of a regular hazard analysis, that either there are no hazards that must be prevented, eliminated or reduced to acceptable levels, or that identified hazards are sufficiently and regularly controlled through the implementation of general and specific food hygiene requirements laid down in Article 4(2) to (6).
Ko pristojni organ zahteva dokaze o izpolnjevanju zahtev iz člena 4(2) do (6), ustrezno upošteva naravo in velikost nosilca živilske dejavnosti.
In requiring evidence of compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 4(2) to (6), the competent authority shall take due account of the nature and size of the food business.
Postopkovni vidiki
Procedural aspects
– Predlog spada med tako imenovane hitre ukrepe, ki so bili vključeni v sporočilo o akcijskem programu za zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji (KOM(2007)23).
- This proposal forms part of the so-called 'fast track actions' which were included in the Communication on the Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union (COM(2007)23).
– Značilnost tega predloga je, da obsega dvoje povsem različnih področij, namreč lajšanje upravnih nalog pri prevozninah in pogojih za prevoz na eni ter določbe o izvzetju mikropodjetij od temeljnih obveznosti analize tveganj in kritičnih kontrolnih točk na drugi strani.
- A characteristic feature of the proposal is the fact that it covers two completely different areas, namely, on the one hand, alleviation of the administrative burden in the area of transport rates and conditions and, on the other, provisions exempting micro‑enterprises from basic HACCP obligations.
– Zato je konferenca predsednikov 5. julija 2007 sklenila, da na zahtevo predsednika odbora za promet Paola Coste in predsednika odbora za okolje Miroslava Ouzkýja obema odboroma dovoli pripravo zakonodajnega poročila.
- For that reason the Conference of Presidents decided on 5 July 2007, at the request of the chairman of the Transport Committee, Mr Costa, and of the chairman of the Environment Committee, Mr Ouzký, to authorise both committees to draw up a legislative report.
– Medtem ko naj bi se za del predloga, ki se navezuje na higieno živil (za kar je pristojen odbor ENVI) uporabil postopek soodločanja, se za del predloga v zvezi s prometom ne zahteva niti posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom (čeprav se zahteva posvetovanje z Ekonomsko-socialnim odborom).
- Whilst the part of the proposal relating to the hygiene of foodstuffs (for which ENVI is the committee responsible) is subject to the normal codecision procedure, the part of the proposal relating to transport does not even require Parliament to be consulted (although the Economic and Social Committee is required to be consulted).
Dejstvo, da je vendarle prišlo do posvetovanja z Evropskim parlamentom, je potemtakem mogoče razumeti kot prostovoljni postopek posvetovanja brez kakršnega koli vpliva na zakonodajni postopek.
The fact that Parliament is nonetheless being consulted may be considered a voluntary consultation process without any influence on the legislative procedure.
– Komisija pri tem zakonodajnem predlogu nima namena ponovno obravnavati temeljnih načela obeh dosjejev, pač pa omejiti obravnavane vidike na zmanjševanje upravnih bremen.
- The Commission's intention in this legislative proposal is to confine the aspects dealt with to reducing administrative burdens, without reopening the two dossiers in terms of their basic principles.
– Tudi Svet je sklenil, da bo oba dela predloga obravnaval ločeno.
- The Council has also decided to consider the two parts of the proposal separately.
– Kar se postopka tiče, bi moral odbor ENVI ravnati v skladu z običajnim postopkom soodločanja.
- The ENVI Committee should follow the normal codecision procedure.
Potreba po predpisih za oprostitev nekaterih nosilcev dejavnosti postopkov analize tveganj in kritičnih kontrolnih točk
Necessity for rules exempting certain businesses from HACCP procedures
Uvedba, izvajanje in vzdrževanje sistema analize tveganj in kritičnih kontrolnih točk (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point – HACCP) je nujna.
The putting in place, implementing and maintaining of a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system is essential.
Pri obravnavi paketa o higieni živil se je Evropski parlament ukvarjal predvsem z zagotavljanjem čim višje ravni varnosti živil in sočasno vzpostavitvijo izvedljivega in prožnega nadzornega mehanizma.
When considering the food hygiene package, Parliament was above all concerned to ensure the highest possible level of food safety and at the same time to establish a practicable and flexible control mechanism.
- Politika na ravni Skupnosti, zlasti živilska zakonodaja, mora zagotavljati visoko raven zaščite za življenje in zdravje ljudi ter interese potrošnikov.
- Policy at Community level, and in particular food law, must ensure a high level of protection of human life and health and of the interests of consumers.
Tega cilja ni mogoče uresničiti s popolno odpravo postopka analize tveganj in kritičnih kontrolnih točk, saj ta instrument nosilcem živilske dejavnosti pomaga dosegati višji standard varnosti živil.
This objective would not be achieved if the HACCP procedure was completely abolished, as this instrument helps food business operators to achieve a higher standard of food safety.
- Izkušnje kažejo, da so ti predpisi in postopki trdna podlaga za zagotavljanje varnosti živil.
- Experience has shown that these rules and procedures constitute a sound basis for ensuring food safety.
- Odgovornost nosilcev živilske dejavnosti se je krepila in se še krepi s splošnim izvajanjem postopkov, ki se opirajo na načela analize tveganj in kritičnih kontrolnih točk.
- General implementation of procedures based on HACCP principles has led to, and is continuing to lead to, greater responsibility on the part of food business operators.
- Da se ohrani in utrdi zaupanje potrošnikov, trgovskih partnerjev in drugih udeležencev v živilskem sektorju, je potrebna jasna in zavezujoča ureditev.
- Clear, binding rules are needed in order to maintain and ensure confidence on the part of consumers, trading partners and other parties in the food sector.
- Enake konkurenčne pogoje in prosto gibanje živil in krmil v Skupnosti je mogoče zagotoviti le, če zahteve po varnosti živil in krmil v posameznih državah članicah ne bodo pretirano odstopale druga od druge.
- A level playing field in terms of competition and free movement of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs within the Community can only be ensured if food and feed safety requirements in individual Member States do not significantly differ from each other.
- Poročevalec izrecno podpira vodilno misel predloga Komisije o nadaljnjem zmanjševanju birokracije.
- Your rapporteur expressly supports the key concern in the Commission proposal to reduce red tape.
V tem trenutku je ni smiselno spreminjati.
It does not make sense to amend it at the present time.
Poleg tega je za uredbo (ES) št. 852/2004 v letu 2009 predvidena revizija.
In addition, Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 provides for a review to be carried out in 2009.
Dokler ne bodo znani njeni dokončni rezultati, pa ni priporočljivo vlagati predlogov sprememb.
It would not be advisable to introduce amendments before the final results of the review have been published.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe št. 11 o odpravi diskriminacije pri prevozninah in pogojih za prevoz po členu 79(3) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske gospodarske skupnosti in Uredbe št. 852/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o higieni živil ( KOM(2007)0090 – C6 0211/2007 – 2007/0037B(COD) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation No 11 concerning the abolition of discrimination in transport rates and conditions, in implementation of Article 79(3) of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community and Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council on the hygiene of foodstuffs ( COM(2007)0090 – C6‑0211/2007 – 2007/0037B(COD) ).
Odbor za pravne zadeve se je na seji dne 19. decembra 2007 v skladu s členom 35(3) poslovnika na lastno pobudo odločil preveriti točnost in primernost pravne podlage omenjenega predloga Komisije.
At its meeting of 19 December 2007 the Committee on Legal Affairs decided on its own initiative, pursuant to Rule 35(3), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Odbor je omenjeno vprašanje nadalje obravnaval na seji dne 14. januarja 2008.
The committee continued its consideration of the above question at its meeting of 14 January 2008.
Evropska komisija je v skladu s postopkom soodločanja Parlamentu predložila Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe št. 11 o odpravi diskriminacije pri prevozninah in pogojih za prevoz po členu 79(3) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske gospodarske skupnosti in Uredbe (ES) št. 852/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o higieni živil ( KOM(2007)0090 ).
The European Commission submitted to Parliament under the codecision procedure a Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Regulation No 11 concerning the abolition of discrimination in transport rates and conditions, in implementation of Article 79(3) of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community and Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council on the hygiene of foodstuffs ( COM(2007)0090 ).
Kot je razvidno iz naslova predloga, je bil namen Komisije predložiti eno samo uredbo na podlagi členov 75(3), 95 in 152(4)(b) Pogodbe ES, ki bi spremenila uredbo št. 11 o odpravi diskriminacije pri prevozninah in pogojih za prevoz , ki temelji na sedanjem členu 75(3), in uredbo št. 852/2004 o higieni živil, ki temelji na členih 95 in 152(4)(b) pogodbe.
As appears from the title of the proposal, the Commission's intention was to propose a single regulation, based on Article 75(3), Article 95 and Article 152(4)(b) of the EC Treaty, which would amend Regulation No 11 concerning the abolition of discrimination in transport rates and conditions, based on what is now Article 75(3), and Regulation No 852/2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs, based on Articles 95 and 152(4)(b) of the Treaty.
Za ta predlog naj bi se uporabil postopek soodločanja v skladu s členoma 95 in 152(4)(b).
That proposal was subject to the codecision procedure as provided for in Articles 95 and 152(4)(b).
Ker pa člen 75(3), na katerem temelji uredba št. 11, sploh ne predvideva posvetovanja s Parlamentom (čeprav se je Svet v praksi redno posvetoval s Parlamentom
However, given that Article 75(3) - on which Regulation No 11 is based - does not even provide for consultation of Parliament
Člen 75
Article 75
da lahko to pravilo v celoti izkoristijo. o instrumentih, ki temeljijo na tej določbi), je Komisija omogočila postopek soodločanja za svoje predloge spremembe k uredbi št. 11 in uredbi št. 852/2004, in sicer tako, da je predlagala instrument, ki bi spremenil obe uredbi – uredbo št. 11 in uredbo št. 852/2004.
The Council may in particular lay down the provisions needed to enable the institutions of the Community to secure compliance with the rule laid down in paragraph 1 and to ensure that users benefit from it to the full. (although it appears that in practice the Council has regularly consulted Parliament on instruments based on that provision), the Commission made the codecision procedure available for its amendments to Regulation No 11 as well as for the amendments to Regulation No 852/2004 by proposing one instrument amending both Regulation No 11 and Regulation No 852/2004.
5. julija 2007 je konferenca predsednikov pooblastila Odbor za okolje in Odbor za promet, da pripravita vsak svoje poročilo na podlagi predloga Komisije.
On 5 July 2007, the Conference of Presidents authorised the Committee on the Environment and the Committee on Transport to draw up one report each on the basis of the Commission proposal.
13. decembra 2007 je bilo ugotovljeno, da je COREPER odobril razdelitev izvirne sestavljene uredbe v dve ločeni uredbi.
On 13 December 2007, it appears that COREPER approved splitting the original "omnibus regulation" into two separate regulations.
19. decembra 2007 je Odbor za promet sprejel poročilo, v katerem je iz predloga izločil dele, ki spreminjajo uredbo 11, ter spremenil pravno podlago, ki je odslej le člen 75(3).
On 19 December 2007, the Transport Committee adopted a report in which it separated out from the proposal for a regulation those parts amending Regulation 11 and changed the legal basis to Article 75(3) alone.
19. decembra 2007 je poročevalec Odbora za okolje predstavil osnutek poročila, katerega namen je izločiti predlog uredbe o spremembi uredbe št. št. 852/2004 o higieni živil in to uredbo utemeljiti na podlagi členov 95 in 152(4)(b) Pogodbe ES.
On 19 December 2007, the rapporteur for the Environment Committee presented a draft report, which purports to split off the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation No 852/2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs and to base that regulation on Articles 95 and 152(4)(b) of the EC Treaty.
Če povzamemo, je trenutno stanje tako, da Odbor za okolje tisti del izvirnega predloga uredbe, katerega namen je bil spremeniti uredbo št. 852/2004 o higieni živil, preučuje kot ločen predlog uredbe.
To summarise, the present position is that the Environment Committee is dealing with the part of the original proposal for a regulation which sought to amend Regulation No 852/2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs as a separate proposal for a regulation.
Na podoben način Odbor za promet kot ločen predlog uredbe preučuje del originalnega predloga, katerega namen je bil spremeniti uredbo št. 11.
Likewise, the Transport Committee is dealing with the part of the original proposal for a regulation which sought to amend Regulation No 11 as a separate proposal for a regulation.
Če se bo postopek nadaljeval v tej smeri, bosta nastali dve ločeni uredbi, uredba o higieni živil, ki bo sprejeta s postopkom soodločanja, in uredba o prometu, ki bo sprejeta s postopkom, ki ne zahteva niti posvetovanja s Parlamentom.
If the procedure goes through in this way, the upshot will be two separate regulations, a food hygiene regulation adopted under the codecision procedure and a transport regulation adopted under a procedure not requiring even the consultation of Parliament.
Predlog, ki obravnava higieno živil, očitno odpira politična vprašanja občutljive narave, zato se Odboru za okolje ne mudi z glasovanjem.
As far as the proposal dealing with food hygiene is concerned, it appears to raise delicate political problems and the Environment Committee is in no hurry to vote.
Predlog, povezan s prometom, pa je v nasprotju s tem zajet v postavki „hitro ukrepanje“, glede katere je Evropski svet od Parlamenta zahteval, naj da zadevnim točkam prednost, da bi lahko bile sprejete čimbolj zgodaj v letu 2007.
In contrast, the transport proposal falls under the heading of "fast track action" for which the European Council has called on Parliament to give the items concerned special priority with a view to their adoption as soon as possible in 2007.
Zato Odbor za promet ne predlaga nobenih predlogov spremembe k določbam, ki jih Komisija predlaga glede uredbe 11, in je tudi že sprejel svoje poročilo, ki bo obravnavano na plenarnem zasedanju.
For this reason, the Transport Committee is not proposing any amendment to the provisions proposed by the Commission for Regulation No 11, has already adopted its report and is going to this plenary session.
Komisija je pripravljena sprejeti tak pristop.
The Commission is prepared to accept this approach.
Ker gre nedvomno za spremembo pravne podlage prvotnega predloga Komisije, se je Odbor za pravne zadeve na svoji seji 19. decembra 2007 odločil, da se v skladu s členom 35(3) Poslovnika na lastno pobudo loti tega vprašanja.
Given that what is involved is undoubtedly a change in the legal basis of the Commission's original proposal, the Legal Affairs Committee considered at its meeting of 19 December 2007 that it should take this question up on its own initiative pursuant to Rule 35(3) of the Rules of Procedure.
Odbor in njegov poročevalec sta imela malo časa za obravnavo zadeve, zato je odbor na seji 19. decembra 2007 menil, da je priporočljivo odložiti sprejetje mnenja o tem vprašanju, vse dokler ne bi imel čas za razmislek in posvetovanje z Odborom za pravne zadeve.
In view of the short amount of time which the committee and its rapporteur had had to consider this matter, at its meeting of 19 December 2007 the committee considered it advisable to postpone adopting its opinion on this question until it had had time to reflect and to seek the opinion of the Legal Service.
Mnenje, ki ga je pripravila pravna služba Sveta:
According to an opinion prepared by the Council's Legal Service:
„Po temeljiti preučitvi predloga je pravna služba Sveta ugotovila, da te tri pravne podlage predvidevajo različne postopke za obravnavo predloga: člen 75(3) predvideva posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom
"Following a further examination of the proposal by the Legal Service of the Council it appears that the different legal bases foresee different procedures for the handling of the proposal: the Article (75(3)) foresees a consultation of the European Parliament
Člen 75(3) dejansko ne predvideva posvetovanja s Parlamentom.
In fact, Article 75(3) does not provide for consultation of Parliament.
V praksi pa se Svet posvetuje s Parlamentom glede ukrepov, predlaganih v skladu s to določbo. , člena 152(4)(b) in 95 pa postopek soodločanja.
In practice, however, the Council does consult Parliament on measures proposed under this provision. , whereas the Articles 152 (4)b and 95 imply a codecision procedure.
Zaradi različnih pravnih podlag je treba predlog razdeliti na predlog o prevozninah in predlog o higieni živil.“
Due to these differences of the legal bases, it is necessary to split the proposal into two separate proposals, one covering transport rates and the other food hygiene."
In dalje, ker so izvirna uredba št. 11 in naknadni predlogi spremembe k tej uredbi temeljili na sedanjem členu 75(3) Pogodbe ES, ter ob upoštevanju podrobnega mnenja pravne službe Parlamenta, velja, da je člen 75(3) primerna pravna podlaga za novo uredbo, ki bo spremenila uredbo št. 11.
Moreover, having regard to the fact that the original Regulation No 11 and subsequent amendments thereto were all based on what is now Article 75(3) of the EC Treaty and to the detailed opinion of Parliament's Legal Service, it is considered that the proper legal basis for the new regulation amending Regulation No 11 is Article 75(3).
Kar zadeva pravno podlago za uredbo, ki bo spremenila uredbo št. 852/2004 o higieni živil (člena 95 in 152(4)(b)), velja, da je sprejemljiva, saj se člen 75(3) ne nanaša na higieno živil.
As for the legal basis for the regulation amending Regulation No 852/2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (Articles 95 and 152(4)(b)), it is considered that this is acceptable, since Article 75(3) has no bearing on food hygiene.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na seji 14. januarja 2008 ustrezno sprejel soglasno odločitev
At its meeting of 14 January 2008 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously