natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(20) „lokacija“ pomeni določen geografski prostor pod upravljavskim nadzorom organizacije, ki zajema dejavnosti, proizvode ali storitve, vključno z vso infrastrukturo, opremo in materiali;
(20) "site" means a distinct geographic location under the management control of an organisation covering activities, products or services, including all infrastructure, equipment and materials;
Člen 2 – točka 26
Article 2 – point 26
(26) „ akreditacijski organ“ pomeni nacionalni akreditacijski organ v smislu Uredbe (ES) št. xxxx/2008 .
(26) Accreditation Body means a national accreditation body within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No xxxx/2008.
V državah članicah se že več let uporablja delujoč in preverjen sistem akreditacij.
There is a well functioning and tested accreditation system that has been operating in the Member States for a number of years.
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti ga je treba prepustiti državam članicam.
According to the principle of the subsidiarity it should be left to the Member States.
Člen 2 – točka 26 a (novo)
Article 2 – point 26 a (new)
(26a) „znatna sprememba“ pomeni občutno povečanje zmogljivosti ali spremembo narave ali delovanja organizacije.
(26a) " s ubstantial change" means a significant expansion of capacity or change in the nature or functioning of the organisation.
Opredelitev znatnih sprememb je potrebna zaradi določb iz člena 8.
A definition of "substantial change" is needed due to the provisions in Article 8.
Organizacije, ki se želijo prvič registrirati, v skladu s Prilogo I opravijo okoljski pregled vseh okoljskih vidikov organizacije .
Organisations wishing to be registered for the first time shall carry out an environmental review of all environmental aspects of the organisation in accordance with Annex I .
Organizacije, ki se želijo prvič registrirati, razvijejo in izvedejo sistem okoljskega ravnanja .
Organisations wishing to be registered for the first time shall develop and implement an e nvironmental m anagement s ystem.
Ukrepi za dosego tega so opredeljeni v Prilogah od I do IV.
The steps to achieve this are set out in Annexes I to IV.
Najboljša praksa okoljskega ravnanja se upošteva, ko je na voljo, za ustrezne sektorske referenčne dokumente iz člena 46.
Where available, account should be taken of the best environmental management practice included in the relevant sector al reference documents referred to in Article 46 .
Zaradi večje jasnosti se sklicevanje na okoljski pregled premakne na kasnejši odstavek, da bi se prikazal kot le en vidik sistema EMAS.
To create clarity, the reference to an Environmental Review has been moved to a later paragraph to show it is just one aspect of EMAS.
Organizacije , ki imajo certificiran sistem okoljskega ravnanja, priznan v skladu s členom 45(4), ni treba opravili celotnega začetnega okoljskega pregleda, glede na informacije, zagotovljene s priznanim in certificiranim sistemom okoljskega ravnanja .
Organisations which have a certified environmental management system, recognized according to Article 45(4), shall not be obliged to conduct a full initial environmental review, with regard to information provided by the recognised certified environmental management system.
Organizacijam , ki imajo certificiran sistem okoljskega ravnanja, priznan v skladu s členom 45(4), ni treba opraviti tistih delov, ki so priznani kot skladni s to uredbo .
Organisations which have a certified environmental management system recognized according to Article 45(4), shall not be obliged to carry out those parts which have been recogni s ed as equivalent to this R egulation.
V skladu s členom 45 je treba priznati vse bistvene vidike vsakega certificiranega sistema okoljskega ravnanja, ne zgolj okoljski pregled.
All relevant aspects of any certified Environmental Management System, not just the environmental review, should be recognized according to Article 45.
Organizacije na podlagi rezultatov pregleda oblikujejo in izvajajo sistem okoljskega ravnanja, ki zajema vse zahteve iz Priloge II in, če je na voljo, upoštevajo najboljše prakse okoljskega ravnanja za ustrezni sektor iz člena 46.
In the light of the results of the review, organisations shall develop and implement an environmental management system covering all the requirements referred to in Annex II, and, where available, taking into account the best environmental management practice for the relevant sector referred to in Article 46.
V skladu s točko A.3.1 Priloge II o zahtevah za sistem okoljskega ravnanja organizacija opravi začetni okoljski pregled ob upoštevanju zadev iz Priloge I.
In accordance with point A.3.1 of Annex II on the e nvironmental m anagement s ystem requirements , the organisation shall carry out an initial e nvironmental r eview, taking into account the matters set out in Annex I.
V skladu s spremembo odstavka 1 tega člena se sklicevanje na okoljski pregled premakne na ta odstavek, da bi se prikazal kot le en vidik sistema EMAS.
In line with the amendment to paragraph 1 of this article, the reference to an Environmental Review has been moved to this paragraph to show it is just one aspect of an EMAS .
Organizacije opravijo notranjo presojo v skladu z zahtevami iz Priloge III.
Organisations shall carry out an internal audit in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex III.
V skladu s točko A.5.5 Priloge II o zahtevah za sistem okoljskega ravnanja organizacije opravijo notranjo presojo skladu z zahtevami iz Priloge III.
In accordance with point A.5.5 of Annex II on the e nvironment m anagement s ystem requirements , organisations shall carry out an internal audit in line with the requirements set out in Annex III.
Ta sprememba pojasnjuje, da so notranje presoje ena od zahtev za sistem okoljskega ravnanja, ki so navedene v Prilogi II.
This amendment clarifies that internal audits are one of the requirements of the Environmental Management System listed in Annex II.
Člen 4 – odstavek 7 – pododstavek 1
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Organizacije pripravijo okoljsko izjavo v skladu z delom B Priloge IV .
Organisations shall prepare an environmental statement, in accordance with Annex IV Part B .
V skladu s točko A.5.1 Priloge II o zahtevah za sistem okoljskega ravnanja organizacije pripravijo okoljsko izjavo v skladu s Prilogo IV .
In accordance with point A.5.1 of Annex II on the e nvironmental m anagement s ystem requirements , organisations shall prepare an environmental statement, in line with Annex IV.
Ta sprememba pojasnjuje, da so okoljske izjave ena od zahtev za sistem okoljskega ravnanja, ki so navedene v Prilogi II.
This amendment clarifies that Environmental Statements are one of the requirements of the Environmental Management System listed in Annex II.
Člen 4 – odstavek 8
Article 4 – paragraph 8
Registrirana organizacija na tri leta:
A registered organisation shall on a three-yearly basis:
(a) preveri celotni sistem okoljskega ravnanja in program presoje;
(a) have the full environmental management system and audit programme verified,
(b) pripravi okoljsko izjavo v skladu z zahtevami iz delov B in D Priloge IV;
(b) prepare the environmental statement in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex IV, Parts B and D,
(c) pridobi potrditev okoljske izjave;
(c) have the environmental statement validated,
(d) pristojnemu organu posreduje potrjeno okoljsko izjavo;
(d) forward the validated environmental statement to the Competent Body,
(e) pristojnemu organu posreduje izpolnjen obrazec, ki vsebuje vsaj najnujnejše podatke iz Priloge VI.
(e) forward to the Competent Body a completed form, which includes at least the minimum information set out in Annex VI.
Uvajanje dveh ciklusov poročanja in presoje je nepotrebno in lahko povzroči zmedo.
The introduction of two different reporting and auditing cycles is unnecessary and potentially confusing.
Namesto tega je treba oba ciklusa povezati v en letni postopek.
Instead, the two cycles should be combined into one annual procedure.
Registrirana organizacija na eno leto:
A registered organisation shall, on an annual basis:
Registrirana organizacija na eno leto:
A registered organisation shall on an annual basis:
(a) opravi notranjo presojo okoljske uspešnosti in zagotovi izpolnjevanje veljavnih zahtev v zvezi z okoljem v skladu s Prilogo III;
(a) carry out an internal audit of the environmental performance and the compliance with applicable legal requirements relating to the environment in accordance with Annex III,
(b) pripravi poročilo o okoljski uspešnosti v skladu z zahtevami iz delov C in D Priloge IV;
(b) prepare an environmental performance report in accordance with the requirements laid down in Annex IV Parts C and D ,
(b) posodobi okoljsko izjavo in poskrbi za njeno potrditev v skladu z zahtevami iz Priloge IV;
(b) update the e nvironmental s tatement , in accordance with the requirements laid down in Annex IV and have it validated ,
(c) pristojnemu organu posreduje potrjeno poročilo o okoljski uspešnosti ;
(c) forward the validated environmental performance report to the Competent Body,
(c) pristojnemu organu posreduje potrjeno okoljsko izjavo ;
(c) forward the validated environmental statement to the Competent Body,
(d) pristojnemu organu posreduje izpolnjen obrazec, ki vsebuje vsaj najnujnejše podatke iz Priloge VI .
(d) forward to the Competent Body a completed form, which includes at least the minimum information set out in Annex VI.
(d) pristojnemu organu posreduje izpolnjen obrazec, ki vsebuje vsaj najnujnejše podatke iz Priloge VI ;
(d) forward to the Competent Body a completed form, which includes at least the minimum information set out in Annex VI ,
(da) poskrbi za preverjanje celotnega sistema okoljskega ravnanja in programa presoje.
( da ) have the full environmental management system and audit programme verified .
Namesto tega je treba oba ciklusa povezati v letni postopek.
Instead, the two cycles should be combined into one annual procedure.
Pristojni organi na zahtevo majhne organizacije za slednjo podaljšajo triletno osnovo iz člena 6(1) na pet let ali letno osnovo iz člena 6(2) na dve leti, če so izpolnjeni vsi ti pogoji:
Competent Bodies shall, upon request of a small organisation, extend for that organisation, the three-yearly frequency referred to in Article 6(1) up to five years or the annual frequency referred to in Article 6(2) up to two years, provided that all the following conditions are met:
Pristojni organi na zahtevo majhne organizacije za slednjo podaljšajo letno osnovo iz člena 6 na dve leti, če so izpolnjeni vsi ti pogoji:
Competent Bodies shall, upon request of a small organisation, extend for that organisation, the annual frequency referred to in Article 6 up to two years, provided that all the following conditions are met:
(a) ni nobenega okoljskega tveganja;
(a) no environmental risks are present,
(a) je začetni okoljski pregled pokazal, da organizacija nima pomembnih okoljskih vidikov, in
(a) the initial environmental review showed that the organisation has no significant environmental aspects, and
(b) organizacija ne načrtuje nobenih operativnih sprememb svojega sistema okoljskega ravnanja in
(b) the organisation has no operational changes planned to its environmental management system , and
(b) organizacija ne načrtuje nobenih znatnih sprememb , kot so opredeljene v členu 8 .
(b) the organisation has no substantial changes planned, as defined in Article 8 .
(c) ni nobenih pomembnih lokalnih okoljskih problemov .
(c) there exist no significant local environmental problems .
Majhnim organizacijam je treba omogočiti omejeno prilagodljivost.
Limited flexibility should be allowed for small organisations.
Opredelitev okoljskega tveganja se prilagodi opredelitvam iz člena 2.
The definition of environmental risk is brought into line with the definitions in Article 2.
S to spremembo postane točka (c) odvečna.
The amendment makes point (c) superfluous.
Obveznosti za vzdrževanje sistema EMAS povzročajo visoke upravne stroške, ki jih bodo MSP težko krila.
Obligations relating to maintenance of the EMAS system entail high administrative costs which are difficult to bear for an SME.
Za olajšanje dostopa evropskih MSP do sistema je treba zmanjšati take stroške, če organizacija ne predvideva znatnih sprememb proizvodnega sistema in ni razlogov, zaradi katerih bi lahko domnevali, da obstajajo nove grožnje za okolje ali lokalni okoljski problemi.
In order to ease access for European SMEs to the system, such costs should be reduced where the organisation does not plan to make substantial changes to its production system and where there is no reason to expect new environmental dangers or local environmental problems.
Zadevna organizacija mora za podaljšanje iz odstavka 1 pristojnemu organu, ki je organizacijo registriral, poslati prošnjo in zagotoviti dokazila, da so pogoji za odobritev odstopanja izpolnjeni.
In order to obtain the extension referred to in paragraph 1, the organisation concerned shall submit a request to the Competent Body that has registered the organisation and provide evidence that the conditions for derogation are fulfilled.
Predlagani koncept za majhne organizacije glede časovnih intervalov notranjih presoj, poročil o okoljski uspešnosti in okoljskih izjav ni izvedljiv.
The frequency of the audit, the environmental performance report and environmental statement in the scheme proposed for small organisations is unworkable.
Postopek je zapleten in pomeni nepotrebno upravno breme.
The procedure is complicated and will generate excessive administrative costs.
Boljši je koncept, katerega bistveno vsebino je vključevala prva uredba EMAS.
A scheme that was essentially contained in the first EMAS regulation is better.
Ta predvideva, da so majhne organizacije izvzete iz letnih potrditev.
Under this scheme, small organisations are exempted from annual validations.
Tako se je mogoče izogniti postopku, saj nenazadnje pristojni organ odloči, ali bo registracijo izvedel ali ne.
Since it is the Competent Body that ultimately decides whether or not to go ahead with registration, this dispenses with an unnecessary procedure.
Člen 7 – odstavek 3
Article 7 - paragraph 3
Organizacije, upravičene do podaljšanja iz odstavka 1 do dveh let, pristojnemu organu vsako leto, v katerem so opravičene od obveznosti do potrditve poročila o okoljski uspešnosti, pošljejo nepotrjeno poročilo o okoljski uspešnosti.
Organisations benefiting from an extension as referred to in paragraph 1 up to two years shall forward the non-validated environmental performance report to the Competent Body in each year that they are exempt from the obligation to have a validated environmental performance report.
Enoletni ciklus naj bi se načeloma ohranil kot v ISO 14001, dovoljene pa so izjeme v primeru MSP pod zgoraj navedenimi pogoji.
The one year cycle should, in principle, be maintained as in ISO 14001, but exceptions can be made in the case of SMEs under the above mentioned conditions.
Ker okoljski preveritelj odloča o odstopanju od ciklusa preverjanja, ni potrebno pošiljati zahteve pristojnemu organu.
No request is necessary to the competent body as it is up to the environmental verifier to decide about a deviation from the validation cycle.
V primeru znatnih sprememb v registrirani organizaciji organizacija opravi okoljski pregled teh sprememb, vključno z okoljskimi vidiki in vplivi.
In case of substantial changes in a registered organisation , the organisation shall carry out an environmental review of these changes, including their environmental aspects and impacts.
Če registrirana organizacija načrtuje uvedbo znatnih sprememb, organizacija opravi okoljski pregled teh sprememb, vključno z okoljskimi vidiki in vplivi.
Where a registered organisation plans to introduce substantial changes, the organisation shall carry out an environmental review of these changes, including their environmental aspects and impacts.
Sistem EMAS ne sme ovirati tehnološkega razvoja in načrtovanja proizvodnje v podjetju, ampak mora slediti industrijskemu razvoju in zagotavljati okoljske standarde zanj.
The EMAS system should not act as an obstacle to technological development and a firm's production plans, but should follow industrial development and guarantee the environmental standards thereof.
Organizacija posodobi začetni okoljski pregled in ustrezno spremeni okoljsko politiko organizacije .
The organisation shall update the initial environmental review and modify the environmental policy of the organisation accordingly.
Organizacija ustrezno posodobi relevantne dele sistema okoljskega ravnanja .
The organisation shall update the relevant parts of the e nvironmental m anagement s ystem accordingly.
Besedilo pojasnjuje, da je treba spremeniti vse relevantne dele.
The text clarifies that all relevant parts should be modified.
Člen 8 - odstavek 3
Article 8 - paragraph 3
Posodobljeni okoljski pregled in spremenjeno okoljsko politiko je treba preveriti in potrditi.
The updated environmental review and the modified environmental policy shall be verified and validated.
Posodobljeni okoljski pregled in spremenjeno okoljsko politiko je treba preveriti in potrditi po izvedenih spremembah .
The updated environmental review and the modified environmental policy shall be verified and validated following the changes made .
Registrirana organizacija vzpostavi program presoje, ki zagotavlja, da bo v določenem časovnem obdobju, ki ni daljše od treh let, v skladu z zahtevami iz Priloge III opravljena presoja vseh dejavnosti organizacije.
A registered organisation shall establish an audit programme that ensures that over a period of time, not exceeding three years, all activities in the organisation are subject to an audit in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex III.
Registrirana organizacija vzpostavi program presoje, ki zagotavlja, da bo v določenem časovnem obdobju, ki ni daljše od treh let , ob upoštevanju določb člena 7, v skladu z zahtevami iz Priloge III opravljena presoja vseh dejavnosti organizacije.
A registered organisation shall establish an audit programme that ensures that over a period of time, not exceeding three years, subject to the provisions of Article 7, all activities in the organisation are subject to an audit in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex III.
Ta člen je treba uskladiti z določbami člena 7 o izjemah za majhne organizacije.
It is necessary to bring this article into line with the provisions of Article 7 concerning exemptions for small organisations.
Logotip EMAS iz Priloge V lahko uporabljajo samo registrirane organizacije in samo v času trajanja njihove registracije.
The EMAS logo set out in Annex V may be used only by registered organisations and only as long as their registration is valid.
Logotip EMAS iz Priloge V uporabljajo samo registrirane organizacije in samo v času trajanja njihove registracije.
The EMAS logo set out in Annex V shall be used only by registered organisations and only as long as their registration is valid.
Logotip EMAS se lahko uporablja samo v skladu s tehničnimi zahtevami iz Priloge V.
The EMAS logo may only be used in accordance with the technical specifications set out in Annex V.
Logotip EMAS se uporablja samo v skladu s tehničnimi zahtevami iz Priloge V.
The EMAS logo shall only be used in accordance with the technical specifications set out in Annex V.
Besedilo mora biti bolj določno, da bi preprečili možnost napačne razlage.
It is necessary to make the wording more specific to avoid any possibility of misinterpretation.
Logotip se ne uporablja v povezavi s primerjalnimi trditvami o drugih dejavnostih in storitvah ali na način, ki bi lahko ustvaril zamenjavo z oznakami okoljskih proizvodov.
The logo shall not be used in conjunction with comparative claims concerning other activities and services or in a way that may create confusion with environmental product labels.
Logotip se ne uporablja:
The logo shall not be used :
– na proizvodih ali na njihovi embalaži ali
- on products or their packaging , or
– v povezavi s primerjalnimi trditvami o drugih dejavnostih in storitvah ali na način, ki bi lahko ustvaril zamenjavo z oznakami okoljskih proizvodov.
- in conjunction with comparative claims concerning other activities and services or in a way that may create confusion with environmental product labels.
Člen 12 – odstavek 1 – točka (a)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 - point a
(a) obravnavanje ugotovitev zainteresiranih strani, vključno z akreditacijskimi organi in pristojnimi izvršilnimi organi, glede prijavljenih ali registriranih organizacij;
(a) considering observations from interested parties, including Accreditation Bodies and competent enforcement authorities, concerning applicant or registered organisations,
(a) obravnavanje ugotovitev zainteresiranih strani, vključno z akreditacijskimi organi in pristojnimi izvršilnimi organi ter predstavniškimi organi organizacij , glede prijavljenih ali registriranih organizacij;
(a) considering observations from interested parties, including Accreditation Bodies and competent enforcement authorities and the organisations' representative bodies , concerning applicant or registered organisations,
Pristojni organi bi morali sprejemati pripombe registriranih organizacij ali organizacij v postopku registracije, zagotoviti pa je treba tudi mehanizem, s katerim bodo lahko organizacije skupaj prispevale k uspešnemu upravljanju sheme, da se zagotovi uravnoteženo delovanje pristojnih organov.
The Competent Bodies should be able to benefit from the observations of organisations that are registered or in the process of being registered, and provision should be made for a mechanism whereby organisations can contribute collectively to effective management of the scheme, so as to ensure that the competent bodies operate in a balanced manner.
Člen 13 – odstavek 2 – točka (c)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) pristojni organ na podlagi prejetih dokazil ali pozitivnega poročila pristojnega izvršilnega organa ugotovil, da organizacija izpolnjuje veljavne zakonske zahteve.
(c) the Competent Body is satisfied on the basis of material evidence received or through a positive report from the competent enforcement authority of the legal compliance of the organisation;
(c) pristojni organ na podlagi prejetih dokazil ali poročila pristojnega izvršilnega organa ugotovil, da organizacija izpolnjuje veljavne zakonske zahteve.
(c) the Competent Body is satisfied on the basis of material evidence received or through a report from the competent enforcement authority of the legal compliance of the organisation;
Nacionalni regulativni organi običajno potrdijo, da niso našli dokazov o neupoštevanju, raje kot da pripravijo pozitivno poročilo o izpolnjevanju veljavnih zakonskih zahtev.
National Regulators generally confirm that they know of no evidence of non compliance, rather than providing a "positive" report on compliance.
Če pristojni organ od akreditacijskega organa prejme poročilo o nadzoru, ki dokazuje, da dejavnosti okoljskega preveritelja niso bile izvedene dovolj dobro, da bi zagotovile, da prijavljena organizacija izpolnjuje zahteve te uredbe, se njena registracija zavrne.
If a Competent Body receives a supervision report from the Accreditation Body which provides evidence that the activities of the environmental verifier were not performed adequately enough to ensure that the requirements of this Regulation are met by the applicant organisation, it shall refuse to register that organisation.
Pristojni organ pozove organizacijo, naj predloži novo vlogo za registracijo.
The Competent Body shall invite the organisation to submit a new application for registration.
Akreditacijski organ preveri dejavnost okoljskega preveritelja in zadevnemu okoljskemu preveritelju zagotovi možnosti, da poda svoje pripombe.
The Accreditation Body shall conduct a check on the environmental verifier's activities and shall give the environmental verifier concerned an opportunity to express its opinion on the matter.
Če okoljski preveritelj ne predloži zadovoljive obrazložitve, se njegova registracija organa za ugotavljanje skladnosti v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 765/2008 zadrži.
If it does not provide a satisfactory explanation, its accreditation as an assessment body under Regulation (EC) No 765 /2008 shall be suspended.