natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(2) poziva, naj se jasno opredelijo poštena in objektivna merila za razporeditev sredstev z namenom razvoja podeželja,
(2) Calls for fair and objective criteria to be clearly defined for the allocation of funds for rural development objectives;
69. opredeljuje potrebo po osrednjih ključnih gradnikih – varnost preskrbe s hrano in poštena trgovina, trajnost, kmetijstvo v vsej Evropi, kakovost živil, biotska raznovrstnost in varstvo okolja ter zelena rast – da se zagotovi pravična in trajnostnejša SKP; meni, da je treba ohraniti strukturo dveh stebrov, vendar se je pri tem treba izogniti podvajanju ciljev in instrumentov politike in upoštevati vsebino tukaj opredeljenih gradnikov;
Identifies the need for central key building blocks – Food Security and Fair Trade, Sustainability, Agriculture across Europe, Food Quality, Biodiversity and Environmental Protection, and Green Growth – to achieve a fair and more sustainable CAP; considers that the two-pillar structure should be maintained, but that it should avoid duplication of policy objectives and instruments as well as reflecting the content of the building blocks identified here;
Varnost preskrbe s hrano in poštena trgovina
Food security and fair trade
72. poziva k absolutni zahtevi, da se nagrajuje samo aktivno kmetijsko proizvodnjo tako, da se v pravila o navzkrižni skladnosti vključi minimalna dejavnost v zameno za plačilo in da postane sorazmernost ključno načelo pri izvrševanju pravil;
Calls for an absolute requirement that only active agricultural production be rewarded, whereby minimum activity requirements would be included in the cross-compliance rules as a precondition for payments, and for proportionality to be the key principle applied when enforcing the rules;
Kmetijstvo po Evropi
Agriculture across Europe
77. opozarja na posebno vlogo kmetov na obmestnih območjih, kjer je pritisk na podeželske in kmetijske vire lahko precejšnji; poudarja, da je treba ohraniti to proizvodnjo hrane in javnih dobrin blizu mestnega prebivalstva;
Draws attention to the particular role played by farmers in peri-urban areas, where there can be intensive pressures on rural and agricultural resources; stresses that this production of food and public goods near urban populations should be maintained;
Kakovost živil
Food Quality
Biotska raznovrstnost in varstvo okolja
Biodiversity and environmental protection
Zelena rast
Green g rowth
– razvoja lokalnih dinamičnih orodij, kot so lokalno trženje, lokalna predelava in podpora projektom, v katerih sodelujejo vse zainteresirane strani v lokalnem kmetijskem sektorju
- the development of local dynamic tools such as local marketing, local processing, and support for projects involving all stakeholders from the local farming sector;
– razvoja proizvodnje energije iz biomase, bioloških odpadkov, bioplina in, v manjšem obsegu, drugih obnovljivih virov energije ter spodbujanja proizvodnje biogoriv druge generacije, kmetijskih materialov in proizvodov zelene kemije
- the development of biomass, bio-waste, bio-gas and small-scale renewable energy production, as well as encouraging the production of second-generation biofuels, agro-materials and green-chemistry products,
– vlaganja v posodobitve in inovacije ter nove tehnike raziskav in razvoja za prilagoditev podnebnim spremembam in njihovo ublažitev,
- investing in modernisation and innovation, as well as new research and development techniques for adaptation to, and mitigation of, climate change,
82. poziva, naj bodo ti ukrepi podprti z instrumenti za pomoč pri zmanjšanju nestanovitnosti in zagotavljanje stabilnih pogojev za kmetijske dejavnosti in načrtovanje; v zvezi s tem meni, da je treba obravnavati tudi nova inovativna gospodarska in finančna orodja, kot so splošne zavarovalne police za pridelek, terminski trgi in vzajemni skladi, za zaščito proti skrajnim tržnim ali podnebnim razmeram, ne da bi to negativno vplivalo na zasebne sheme, ki se trenutno razvijajo;
Calls for these measures to be backed by instruments designed to help reduce volatility and provide stable conditions for agricultural business and planning; in this context, takes the view that new innovative economic and financial tools such as across-the-board harvest risk insurance policies, futures markets and mutualisation funds should also be considered as a way of dealing with extreme market or climate conditions, without disturbing any private schemes that are being developed;
88. meni, da mora skupna kmetijska politika vsem potrošnikom, zlasti najrevnejšim, omogočiti bolj zdrav način prehranjevanja z raznovrstnimi proizvodi po dostopnih cenah; v boju proti revščini in za boljše zdravje je treba nadaljevati s programi pomoči za najrevnejše v družbi ter razširiti programe za spodbujanje porabe sadja in zelenjave v šolah;
Takes the view that the common agricultural policy must enable a healthier diet to be made available to all consumers, particularly the poorest among them, on the basis of a more varied, accessibly priced range of products; in order to combat poverty and improve health, aid programmes for the poorest in society must be continued, and programmes to boost consumption of fruit and vegetables in schools extended;
SKP ter večletni finančni okvir in letni proračunski postopek
The CAP in the multi-annual financial framework and annual budgetary procedure
92. poudarja, da pravno zavezujoča narava večletnega finančnega okvira zahteva uvedbo prožnejših določb o izvajanju, da se bo lahko Unija dovolj prožno in učinkovito odzivala na nepredvidene dogodke;
Emphasises that the legally binding nature of the MFF necessitates the introduction of more flexible implementing arrangements so that the Union can respond sufficiently flexibly and effectively to unforeseen events;
94. ponovno opozarja, da so se pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi, ki jih je uvedel Evropski parlament, razvili v pomembna orodja za oblikovanje prednostnih nalog politike in uvedbo novih pobud, ki so se pogosto prenesle v dejavnosti in programe EU, tudi na področju kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja; meni, da bi bili lahko pilotski projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi v prihodnje podlaga za preizkušanje novih idej za reforme;
Recalls that Pilot Projects (PP) and Preparatory Actions (PA) introduced by the European Parliament have evolved into important tools for the formulation of political priorities and the introduction of new initiatives that often turned into EU activities and programmes, including in the field of agriculture and rural development; believes that pilot projects and preparatory actions could also in the future be a platform for testing new ideas for reforms.
Skupna kmetijska politika je uspešno izpolnjevala cilje, ki so bili zastavljeni v prvotni rimski pogodbi.
The Common Agricultural Policy has been successful in fulfilling the objectives as set out in the original Treaty of Rome.
SKP je v preteklih 50 letih izboljšala produktivnost, prispevala k primernemu življenjskemu standardu kmečkega prebivalstva, stabilizirala trge, zagotovila nemoteno preskrbo in potrošnikom zagotovila kakovostno hrano po zmernih cenah.
Over the past 50 years, the CAP has increased productivity, contributed to a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, stabilised markets, secured the availability of supplies and provided consumers with quality food at reasonable prices.
Prihodnja SKP se bo morala spoprijeti z novimi in težkimi izzivi ter bo morala zagotoviti okvir za prihodnost na temeljih stabilnosti, predvidljivosti in prilagodljivosti v kriznih časih.
The CAP of the future will have to face new and pressing challenges and has to provide a framework for the future based on stability, predictability and flexibility in times of crisis.
Ozadje reforme so gospodarska kriza in resne finančne težave, s katerimi se soočajo države članice, davkoplačevalci, kmetje in potrošniki, zato moramo oblikovati skladno in verodostojno podlago za SKP po letu 2013.
The background to the reform is one of economic crisis and serious financial difficulties facing member States, taxpayers, farmers and consumers and, therefore, we must set out a coherent and credible way forward for the CAP post-2013.
SKP se bo morala prilagoditi spremenjenim evropskim in svetovnim razmeram.
The CAP will have to adapt to a changing European and global context.
Evropsko kmetijstvo mora v prvi vrsti potrošnikom zagotoviti varnost preskrbe s hrano in pomagati nahraniti vedno številčnejše svetovno prebivalstvo.
First and foremost, European agriculture must ensure food security to its own consumers and contribute to feeding a steadily growing world population.
Vendar zdaj prvič ne moremo le „odpreti ventila“ in proizvesti več hrane z večjo uporabo energije in večjimi sredstvi.
For the first time, however, we just cannot ‘turn on the tap’ and produce more food through the use of extra energy and extra inputs.
Obstajata dva glavna razloga: prvič, energetska kriza, višji stroški energije in potreba po zmanjšanju emisij toplogrednih plinov predstavljajo veliko omejitev za povečanje proizvodnje.
There are two main reasons: firstly, the energy crisis, the rising cost of energy and the need to reduce GHG emissions will act as major constraints to increased production.
Drugič, učinek podnebnih sprememb bo onemogočil uporabo velikih predelov dodatnih površin za kmetijsko proizvodnjo.
Secondly, the impact of climate change will close off the option of bringing large tracts of extra land into production.
Podnebne spremembe bodo povzročile tudi pomanjkanje vode in suše, zaradi česar bo spet omejeno povečanje proizvodnje.
Climate change will also cause water shortages and droughts which again will act as a break on increasing production.
Kmetijstvo v EU in po celem svetu bo moralo tako zagotoviti več hrane z manj zemlje, manj vode in manj energije.
As a result, EU and worldwide agriculture will have to produce more food with less land, less water and less energy.
Temeljni kamen SKP mora biti še vedno zagotovitev konkurenčnosti evropskega kmetijstva v primerjavi z dobro subvencioniranimi trgovinskimi partnerji, kot so Združene države, Japonska, Švica ali Norveška, kar bo kmetom v EU zagotovilo poštene trgovinske pogoje.
The foundation stone of the CAP should still be to ensure that European agriculture is competitive against well-subsidised trading partners such as the US, Japan, Switzerland or Norway, providing EU farmers with fair trade conditions.
Še naprej je treba spodbujati kmetijsko dejavnost v celotni Evropi, da se zagotovi lokalna proizvodnja hrane in uravnotežen ozemeljski razvoj.
It must also continue to support agricultural activity across Europe, with the view of ensuring local food production and a balanced territorial development.
Poleg tega je zelo pomembno, da današnje kmetijstvo pokaže, da je na dobri poti, da bo znatno prispevalo k oblikovanju novih prednostnih nalog v okviru strategije EU 2020 za obravnavanje podnebnih sprememb in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest z zeleno rastjo ter hkrati še naprej zagotavljalo varnost preskrbe s hrano za evropske potrošnike s proizvodnjo varnih in visokokakovostnih proizvodov.
In addition, it is very important for today’s agriculture to demonstrate that it is well placed to make a major contribution to delivering the new EU 2020 Strategy priorities of tackling climate change, innovating, and creating new jobs through green growth, whilst at the same time continuing to provide food security for European consumers by producing safe and high quality food products.
Evropski kmetje in SKP morajo pokazati, da lahko ponudijo nekaj odgovorov na izzive 21. stoletja ter da so del rešitve in ne del težave.
European farmers and the CAP must show that they have some of the answers to the 21st century challenges, and that they are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
Z razširitvijo EU na 27 držav članic je pomembno, da bodo končno izpolnjena pričakovanja novih držav članic po pravični obravnavi.
With the expansion of the EU to 27 member States, it is vital that new member States’ expectations for fair treatment are eventually honoured.
Da se izpolnijo nove prednostne naloge in pričakovanja vseh držav članic EU, je treba v okviru novih finančnih perspektiv ohraniti proračunski znesek SKP vsaj na ravni leta 2013.
To meet the new priorities and the expectations of all EU member States, the CAP budget amount needs to be at least maintained at 2013 levels in the context of the new financial perspectives.
V poročilu sem opredelil prednostne naloge skupne in verodostojne večnamenske kmetijske politike preskrbe s hrano, ki bo zagotovila podporo kmetom v korist širše družbe.
In the report, I have set out the priorities for a common and credible multi-functional agricultural food policy which will deliver support to farmers for the benefit of the wider society.
Opredelil sem pet ključnih stebrov, in sicer varnost preskrbe s hrano in poštena trgovina, trajnost, kmetijstvo v vsej Evropi, biotska raznovrstnost in varstvo okolja ter zelena rast , da se zagotovi pravičnejša, bolj zelena in trajnostnejša prihodnja SKP.
I have set out five key building blocks namely; Food Security and Fair Trade, Sustainability, Agriculture across Europe , Biodiversity and Environmental Protection , and Green Growth , to deliver a fairer, greener and more sustainable CAP for the future.
V okviru izvajanja določb nove Lizbonske pogodbe mora Evropski parlament resno prevzeti nove odgovornosti kot sozakonodajalec na področju kmetijstva.
In the context of the implementation of the new Lisbon Treaty provisions, the European Parliament must take its new responsibilities as co-legislator in agricultural matters seriously.
Komisija in Svet morata pri tej zadevi bolj neposredno, enakopravno in v dobri veri sodelovati s poslanci.
The Commission and Council should work more directly, equally and in good faith with Parliamentarians on this particular dossier.
V ta namen bom čim bolj učinkovito uporabil možnosti, ki jih zagotavlja nov institucionalni okvir.
To that aim, I intend to use as efficiently as possible the possibilities offered by the new institutional context.
Zagovarjal bom ključno vlogo Parlamenta ob hkratnem sprejemanju prožnega pristopa k oblikovanju politike, s posebnim poudarkom na sorazmernosti in subsidiarnosti.
I will defend the key role to be played by Parliament, whilst adopting a flexible approach to policy making, with particular emphasis on proportionality and subsidiary.
Prihodnost skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013
on the future of the CAP after 2013
Poročevalec: Giovanni La Via
Rapporteur: Giovanni La Via
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije šteje večletni finančni okvir za pravno zavezujoč akt, s katerim mora biti usklajen letni proračun,
A. whereas the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union renders the multiannual financial framework (MFF) a legally binding act with which the annual budget has to comply,
B. ker je Evropski parlament z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe pridobil pristojnost za oblikovanje kmetijske politike Unije ne le pri večletnih kmetijskih programih, ampak tudi s spreminjanjem letnega proračuna za kmetijstvo, kar mu nalaga odgovornost, da zagotovi pošteno in trajnostno skupno kmetijsko politiko,
B. whereas, with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament has gained the power to shape the Union’s agricultural policy, not only as regards multiannual agricultural programmes but also by amending the annual budget for agriculture, thus giving Parliament responsibility for ensuring a fair and sustainable common agricultural policy,
C. ker se bo morala nova skupna kmetijska politika soočiti z novimi in zahtevnimi izzivi, pri čemer bo morala z ustreznimi kakovostnimi proizvodi zadostiti potrebam evropskih državljanov po hrani, odgovoriti na težave pri zanesljivosti preskrbe s hrano v svetu, zagotoviti delovanje kmetijskih trgov in podpirati prihodek kmetijskega sektorja, pa tudi varovati okolje povsod po Evropi in se odzivati na podnebne spremembe,
C. whereas the new CAP will have to face new and demanding challenges with a view not merely to meeting the food consumption needs of European citizens with adequate quality products, addressing the difficulties relating to world food security, ensuring the functioning of the agricultural markets and supporting the income of the agricultural sector but also preserving the environment in all parts of Europe and responding to climate change,
D. ker odhodki za kmetijstvo predstavljajo zgolj 0,49 % celotnega BDP Evropske unije (podatek za leto 2008), s čimer je Evropska unija glede na znesek finančne podpore kmetom na prebivalca primerljiva s svojimi velikimi trgovinskimi partnericami, kot so Združene države Amerike,
D. whereas agricultural expenditure only accounts for 0.49% of total EU GDP (2008 figure), which, when converted into per capita financial support to farmers, puts the European Union level of support on a par with that of its main trading partners, such as the USA,
E. ker odhodki za neposredno pomoč predstavljajo 0,38 % BDP Evropske unije (podatek za leto 2008),
E. whereas expenditure in the form of direct aid accounts for 0.38% of EU GDP (2008 figure),
F. ker odhodki za politiko za razvoj podeželja predstavljajo 0,11 % BDP Evropske unije,
F. whereas expenditure linked to the rural development policy accounts for 0.11% of EU GDP,
G. ker od leta 2007 mehanizmi prostovoljne modulacije omogočajo prerazporeditev finančne pomoči med neposrednimi plačili in razvojem podeželja, kar pa ni povečalo preglednosti in legitimnosti pri finančnih sredstvih za kmetijstvo ali jih poenostavilo,
G. whereas, since 2007, voluntary modulation mechanisms have allowed the redeployment of financial aid between direct payments and rural development, without however improving the transparency, legitimacy and simplification of the financial resources allocated to agriculture,
2. poudarja, da pravno zavezujoča narava večletnega finančnega okvira zahteva uvedbo prožnejših določb o izvajanju, da se bo lahko Unija dovolj prožno in učinkovito odzivala na nepredvidene dogodke;
Emphasises that the legally binding nature of the MFF necessitates the introduction of more flexible implementing arrangements so that the Union can respond sufficiently flexibly and effectively to unforeseen events;
7. ponovno opozarja, da so se pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi, ki jih je uvedel Evropski parlament, razvili v pomembna orodja za oblikovanje prednostnih nalog politike in uvedbo novih pobud, ki so se pogosto prenesle v dejavnosti in programe EU, tudi na področju kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja; meni, da bi bili lahko pilotski projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi v prihodnje podlaga za preizkušanje novih idej za reforme.
Recalls that Pilot Projects (PP) and Preparatory Actions (PA) introduced by the European Parliament have evolved into important tools for the formulation of political priorities and the introduction of new initiatives that often turned into EU activities and programmes, including in the field of agriculture and rural development; believes that pilot projects and preparatory actions could also in the future be a platform for testing new ideas for reforms.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES v zvezi s kapitalskimi zahtevami za trgovalno knjigo in za dodatna listinjenja ter v zvezi z nadzorniškim pregledom politik prejemkov
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC as regards capital requirements for the trading book and for re-securitisations, and the supervisory review of remuneration policies
Morebitni izbrisi tovrstnega besedila so označeni z [...] .
Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make in passages of this kind are indicated thus: [...] .
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................82
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............84
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve .........................................................................102
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ....................................................106
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES v zvezi s kapitalskimi zahtevami za trgovalno knjigo in za dodatna listinjenja ter v zvezi z nadzorniškim pregledom politik prejemkov
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC as regards capital requirements for the trading book and for re-securitisations, and the supervisory review of remuneration policies
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0362 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0362 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 47(2) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7‑0096/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 47(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0096/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 294(3) in 53 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 53 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske centralne banke z dne 12. novembra 2009
– having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank of 12 November 2009
UL C 291, 1.12.2009, str.
OJ C 291, 1.12.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 20. januarja 2010
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 20 January 2010
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbora za pravne zadeve (A7‑0000/2010),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0205/2010 ),
(1) Pretirano in nepreudarno tveganje v bančnem sektorju je privedlo do propada posameznih finančnih institucij ter sistemskih težav v državah članicah in v svetu.
(1) Excessive and imprudent risk-taking in the banking sector has led to the failure of individual financial institutions and systemic problems in Member States and globally.
Razlogi za takšno tveganje so številni in zapleteni, vendar med nadzorniki in regulativnimi organi, vključno z G20 in Odborom evropskih bančnih nadzornikov, obstaja soglasje, da so k temu prispevale tudi neprimerne strukture prejemkov nekaterih finančnih institucij.
While the causes of such risk-taking are many and complex, there is agreement by supervisors and regulatory bodies, including the G20 and the Committee of European Banking Supervisors, that the inappropriate remuneration structures of some financial institutions have been a contributory factor.
Politike prejemkov, ki pospešujejo tveganja, ki presegajo splošno raven tveganj, sprejemljivih za institucijo, lahko ogrozijo premišljeno in učinkovito obvladovanje tveganja ter spodbudijo pretirano tvegano ravnanje.
Remuneration policies which give incentives to take risks that exceed the general level of risk tolerated by the institution can undermine sound and effective risk management and exacerbate excessive risk-taking behaviour.
Zato so še posebej pomembna mednarodno dogovorjena in podprta načela odbora za finančno stabilnost glede premišljene prakse nadomestil.
T he internationally agreed and endorsed p rinciples of the Financial Stability Board for sound compensation practices are therefore of particular importance.