natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prav je, da se v uredbi jasno zapiše, kateri organi lahko dostopajo do podatkov.
It should be clearly laid down in the legal text which authorities will have access to the data.
Nepooblaščeno dostopanje ni sprejemljivo iz naslova zaščite zasebnosti.
Unauthorised access is not acceptable from a privacy point of view.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 5 A (novo) Člen 4 b, odstavek 2 (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 1030/2002)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5 A (new) Article 4 b, paragraph 2 (new) (Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002)
Biometričnih podatkov, zapisanih v nosilec za shranjevanje podatkov, ne sme spreminjati ali brisati noben organ.
The biometric data recorded on the storage medium may not be modified or erased by any authority.
Kadar je treba spremeniti ali izbrisati podatke, se izda novo dovoljenje za bivanje.
Where such a need arises, a new residence permit shall be issued.
Zagotoviti je treba, da po izdaji dovoljenja za prebivanje na nosilec za shranjevanje podatkov ni možno dodajanje novih podatkov.
It is important to guarantee that once the residence permit is issued, no other information will be added in the storage medium.
Če se izkaže, da so spremembe nujne, se izda novo dovoljenje za prebivanje, kar imetniku omogoča, da je s spremembami seznanjen.
If the need arises to make any changes, a new residence permit will be issued to make the holder aware of those changes.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 5 A (novo) Člen 4 b, odstavka 3 in 4 (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 1030/2002)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5 A (new) Article 4 b, paragraphs 3 and 4 (new) (Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002)
Odločitve s pomembnimi posledicami za varstvo podatkov, kot so odločitve o registriranju podatkov in o dostopu do njih, o njihovi kakovosti, tehnični skladnosti nosilca za shranjevanje podatkov in o zaščiti biometričnih identifikatorjev, se sprejemajo s predpisom ob polni udeležbi Evropskega parlamenta.
Decisions having substantial data protection implications, such as decisions on entering and accessing data, on the quality of data, on the technical compliance of storage media and on security measures for the protection of the biometric features shall be made by way of regulation with the full involvement of the European Parliament.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov ima pri vseh odločitvah s posledicami za varstvo podatkov posvetovalno vlogo.
The European Data Protection Supervisor shall have an advisory role in all cases having data protection implications.
Evropskemu parlamentu bi morala biti omogočena ustrezna vloga pri vseh odločitvah v zvezi z varstvom in zaščito podatkov, da se zagotovi strožji demokratični nadzor in zakonitost obdelave podatkov.
An adequate role should be given to Parliament in all and any decision concerning data security and data protection, thus allowing for better democratic control and ensuring the lawfulness of data processing.
Poročevalec tudi meni, da bi moral svoje mnenje o sprejetih odločitvah izraziti evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov, saj je to jamstvo, da se z odločitvami polno spoštujejo načela glede varstva podatkov.
The rapporteur also considers that the EDPS should have the possibility to advice on the choices made, in order to ensure that they completely respect the data protection principles.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 6 A (novo) Člen 9, odstavek 4 a (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 1030/2002)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 A (new) Article 9, paragraph 4 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002)
(6a) V člen 9 se doda naslednji odstavek 4a:
(6a) In Article 9, the following paragraph 4a is added:
Zelo pomembno je, da obstaja sistem učinkovitega nadzora, kar bo spodbudilo zaupanje v biometrijo.
It is very important to have an effective control network in place in order to increase trust in the concept of biometrics.
Z namenom uskladiti različne oblike dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki jih države članice izdajajo državljanom tretjih držav, je bila 13. junija 2002 sprejeta Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1030/2002 o enotni obliki dovoljenja za prebivanje za državljane tretjih držav.
With the intention of harmonising the format of residence permits issued by Member States to third-country nationals, on 13 June 2002 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) 1030/2002 laying down a uniform format for residence permits for third-country nationals.
24. septembra 2003 je Komisija predstavila predlog spremembe te uredbe.
On 24 September 2003, the Commission presented a proposal amending Council regulation (EC) 1030/2002.
Predlog je bil vezan na predlog o spremembi uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1683/95 o enotni obliki za vizume.
This proposal was linked to another proposal concerning the amendment of Council Regulation 1683/95 establishing a uniform format for visas.
Vseeno so pri tehničnih vprašanjih nastopile težave zaradi možne nezdružljivosti brezžičnih čipov pa tudi glede možne oblike (nalepka ali ločena kartica).
However, when it came to dealing with the technicalities some problems arose concerning potential collisions between contact-less chips and which kind of format should have been used, namely a sticker or a standalone card.
V obeh primerih je obravnava uredb stekla po postopku posvetovanja, kar je pomenilo, da je bil Parlament vključen v obravnavo.
At that time, consultation was the procedure to follow for both kinds of regulation and Parliament was consulted accordingly.
Poročevalec, ki je že tedaj dobil nalogo, da preuči oba predloga, je takoj izrazil določeno zadržanost.
The rapporteur, who had at the time also been designated as responsible for examining those proposals, expressed doubts about both proposals.
Komisija se je odločila, da enega od predlogov umakne in se je zavezala, da bo spremenjeno različico predloga o enotni obliki dovoljenja za prebivanje za državljane tretjih držav predložila, ko bodo odpravljene tehnične nejasnosti.
The Commission decided to withdraw one of them, undertaking to submit a modified version on a uniform format for residence permits for third-country nationals as soon as all the technical uncertainties had been resolved.
Enotna oblika vizuma je tesno povezana z vzpostavitvijo sistema VIS, tj. sistema za izmenjavo podatkov o vizumih med državami članicami na skupni tehnični platformi s schengenskim informacijskim sistemom druge generacije, in bo torej obravnavana znotraj njega.
The uniform format for visas is closely linked to the development of VIS, i.e. a system for the exchange of visa data between Member States on a common technical platform with the Schengen Information System II, and it will be dealt with in the framework of the VIS system.
Kar zadeva enotno obliko dovoljenja za prebivanje za državljane tretjih držav, je Komisija 13. marca 2006 predstavila spremenjeni predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi uredbe (ES) št. 1030/2002.
As far as a uniform format for residence permits for third-country nationals is concerned, on 13 March 2006 the Commission submitted a modified proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) 1030/2002.
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Skupnih konzularnih navodil o vizumih za diplomatska in konzularna predstavništva glede uvedbe biometričnih podatkov, vključno z določbami o organizaciji sprejema in obravnavanja vlog za izdajo vizuma, KOM(2006)269 konč. , v drugem primeru pa za pripravo enotne oblike dovoljenja za prebivanje za državljane tretjih držav v Evropski uniji.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Common Consular Instructions on visas for diplomatic missions and consular posts in relation to the introduction of biometrics including provisions on the organisation of the reception and processing of visa applications, COM(2006) 269 . and the latter being to establish a common format for residence permits for third-country nationals in the EU.
Pregled predloga
The current proposal
Novi predlog obravnava uvedbo biometričnih podatkov (podoba obraza in dve podobi prstnih odtisov imetnika) v dovoljenje za prebivanje.
This new proposal refers to the introduction of biometric data (facial image and two fingerprint images of the holder) in the residence permit which will be produced as a standalone card and must be machine readable.
Dovoljenje za prebivanje v obliki nalepke se bo izdajalo v obdobju največ dveh let po sprejetju tehničnih zahtev
The residence permit will still be issued within a period up to two years after the adoption of the technical specifications
Točka 1 a) priloge h KOM(2006)110. .
Point (1)(a) in Annex to COM (2006) 110 , in a sticker form.
Države članice, ki nameravajo v dovoljenje za prebivanje vključiti kontaktni čip za e-storitve, to lahko storijo na natančno določenem mestu, in sicer na točki 16, ki jo določa priloga k predlogu
Furthermore, Member States which intend to insert in the residence permit a contact chip to be used in the context of e-services are allowed to do so in a defined area, i.e. Zone 16 as described in the annex to the proposal
Glej točko 16 priloge k uredbi (KOM(2006)110).
See Point 16 in the Regulation's Annex, COM (2006) 110.
Predlog za vgradnjo kontaktnega čipa za uporabo novih tehnologij, kot je e-uprava ali digitalni podpis, je bil dodan na prošnjo estonske vlade, ki želi enakovredno obravnavati svoje državljane in državljane tretjih držav na njenem ozemlju tako, da vsem izdaja osebne izkaznice in dovoljenja za prebivanje, ki jim omogočajo dostop do e-storitev. .
This proposal of inserting a contact chip to allow the use of new technologies such as e-government, digital signatures, etc was introduced following the reasoning of the Estonian government wishing to treat their citizens and third-country residents on an equal basis giving them access to e-services via ID cards and residence permits. .
S tem, ko bi države članice v dovoljenje za prebivanje lahko vključile dodatni nosilec za shranjevanje podatkov za nacionalno uporabo, bi jim bilo omogočeno, da upoštevajo doseženo stopnjo razvoja glede potrjevanja verodostojnosti, certificiranja, digitalnega podpisa in storitev e-uprave za državljane tretjih držav, ki zakonito prebivajo na ozemlju ene izmed držav članic.
The possible insertion of an additional storage medium for national use in the residence permit would allow taking into account any national developments in the field of authentication, certification, digital signature and e-government services for third-country nationals living legally in EU territory.
Seveda je uporaba kontaktnega čipa
However, the use of this contact chip
Poročevalec novi predlog pozdravlja kot pozitivno prizadevanje za uskladitev različnih oblik dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki jih države članice izdajajo državljanom tretjih držav.
First of all, the rapporteur welcomes the new proposal, which represents a good effort towards the harmonisation of the format of residence permits issued by Member States to third-country nationals.
Zelo pozitivno je tudi dejstvo, da so vizumi in dovoljenja za prebivanje v nasprotju s prvim predlogom Komisije iz leta 2003
He also highly appreciates the fact that visa and residence permits are no longer linked as they were in the Commission's first proposal of 2003,
KOM (2003)558. obravnavani ločeno, saj smo v prvem delu tega poročila ugotovili, da gre za dve različni področji.
COM (2003) 558 since they serve two different goals, as is clarified in the first part of this report.
Drugič, poročevalec želi poudariti, da dovoljenje za prebivanje ni dokument za potovanje in da ga je treba obravnavati kot osebni dokument, ki se bo lahko uporabljal na schengenskem območju.
Secondly, the rapporteur would like to stress that the residence permit in itself is not a travel document but will be considered as a 'species' of' ID document to be used in the Schengen area.
To pomeni, da bi bila znotraj tega območja istovetnost vseh državljanov tretjih držav, ki na ozemlju Evropske unije bivajo zakonito in so torej imetniki dovoljenja za prebivanje, lahko ugotovljena na enak način.
This will imply that all third- country nationals legally residing in the EU and therefore possessing a residence permit can be identifiable in the same way inside the Schengen area.
To tudi pojasnjuje, zakaj naj bi za dovoljenje za prebivanje (ki se torej obravnava kot običajni osebni dokument) veljale enako stroge zahteve, ki glede varnosti veljajo za nacionalne osebne izkaznice, ne da bi se bilo treba prilagoditi zahtevam iz dokumenta ICAO št. 9303 o strojno berljivih vizumih.
This consideration makes it possible to clarify that, like a simple ID card, the residence permit should respect the same high security standards as are defined for national ID cards, without any need to follow the specifications set out in the ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable visas.
Nenazadnje se morajo te zahteve uporabljati zgolj in samo za potne listine, sam dokument pa je bil že večkrat spremenjen s postopkom, ki ni pregleden in demokratično legitimen.
Those standards should apply only to travel documents proper, and in addition that document has been the object of successive alterations made via a process lacking in transparency or democratic legitimacy.
Sklicevanje na standarde ICAO v tretji uvodni izjavi novega predloga in njegovi prilogi je treba nadomestiti z visokimi varnostnimi zahtevami, opredeljenimi glede na posebne cilje, za katere se bo uporabljalo dovoljenje za prebivanje.
The reference made in the third recital of the new proposal and in its Annex to the ICAO standards should therefore be replaced by more rigorous security specifications defined according to the specific goals the residence permit will be used for.
Bistvo predloga je uvedba biometričnih identifikatorjev, tj. radiofrekvenčnega čipa (RFID), ki bo vseboval podobo obraza (v dveh letih od sprejetja tehničnih ukrepov) in prstne odtise v interoperabilnih oblikah (v treh letih).
The core of the proposal lies in the introduction of biometric identifiers, i.e. a Radio Frequency Chip (RFID) containing a facial image (within two years of the adoption of technical measures) and fingerprints in interoperable formats (within three years).
Poročevalec se načeloma strinja z namenom predloga, tj. uporabo biometričnih podatkov za večjo varnost imetnikov dovoljenj za prebivanje.
As a matter of principle, the rapporteur agrees with the intention of the proposal, i.e. to use biometrics in order to strengthen the security of residence permits.
Uvedba biometričnih podatkov bo dejansko prispevala k preprečevanju njihove zlorabe, saj bo onemogočeno ponarejanje in izrabljanje istovetnosti nekoga drugega.
The introduction of biometrics will in fact help combat document fraud, thus preventing falsification and identity theft.
Pomembna prednost uporabe biometričnih elementov je tudi vzpostavitev zanesljivejše povezave med dovoljenjem za prebivanje in imetnikom.
Furthermore, the major advantage of the use of biometrics is to create a more reliable link between the residence permit and its holder.
Vseeno pa je treba skupaj z uvedbo in obdelovanjem biometričnih podatkov za osebne dokumente poskrbeti za solidna in resna jamstva v zvezi z načinom njihovega zbiranja in uporabe.
Nevertheless, the introduction and processing of biometric data for identity documents needs to have particularly consistent and serious safeguards, especially regarding the way they are collected and used.
Biometrični podatki v dovoljenjih za prebivanje naj bi se uporabljali samo za preverjanje verodostojnosti dokumenta in istovetnosti imetnika z neposredno razpoložljivimi primerljivimi značilnostmi.
Biometric features stored in residence permits should only be used for verifying the authenticity of the document and the identity of the holder by means of directly available comparable features.
Kot je pravilno opozoril nekdanji evropski komisar za pravosodje in notranje zadeve Antonio Vitorino, biometrični podatki, podobno kot vsa druga tehnologija, niso nevarni sami po sebi, temeljne pravice lahko ogrozi le njihova uporaba
As the former European Justice and Home Affairs Commissioner Antonio Vitorino has rightly pointed out, biometrics, 'like any other technology, is not dangerous in itself, but it is the use one makes of it that might endanger fundamental rights'
Mnenje evropskega komisarja za pravosodje in notranje zadeve Antonia Vitorina na javni predstavitvi, ki jo je pripravil Evropski parlament 2. marca 2004. .
Opinion expressed by European JHA Commissioner Antonio Vitorino at a public hearing at the EP on 2 March 2004. .
V novem predlogu je vendarle nekaj vprašanj, ki jih je treba dodatno pojasniti, zlasti kar zadeva zbiranje biometričnih podatkov.
There are some issues in the new proposal that need further clarification, above all as far as the means of collection of biometric data is concerned.
Države članice bi morale pripraviti seznam skupnih obveznosti ali zahtev, s katerimi bi se upošteval posebni značaj teh podatkov.
A list of common obligations or requirements to follow should be drafted for Member States taking into account the specificity of such data.
Poleg tega bi bilo za lažjo uporabo biometričnega dovoljenja za prebivanje primerno opredeliti skupno metodologijo in najboljše prakse za države članice.
Moreover, in order to facilitate the implementation of the biometric residence permit it would be useful to provide Member States with a common methodology and best practices.
Poročevalec žal ugotavlja, da v predlogu ni določb v zvezi z zbiranjem biometričnih podatkov pri otrocih.
The rapporteur notes with disappointment that nothing is foreseen in the current proposal on which we are consulted as regards the collection of biometrics as far as children are concerned.
Dodatna pojasnila o tem vprašanju bi bila dobrodošla.
Further clarification on this matter will be welcome.
Poročevalec opozarja tudi na to, da predlog ne navaja nadomestnih postopkov za osebe, ki zaradi fizičnih razlogov, npr. deformacije ali nesreče, ne morejo zagotoviti uporabnih prstnih odtisov ali podobe obraza.
The rapporteur is also concerned about the lack of fallback procedures for those people who cannot provide usable fingerprints or facial scanning because of physical reasons such as a disability or an accident.
Zato je ob določbi o obvezni podobi obraza in prstnih odtisov treba predvideti izjemo za vse osebe, ki biometričnih podatkov ne morejo dati zaradi telesnih poškodb, in tako zavarovati njihovo dostojanstvo.
A general obligation to provide facial scanning and fingerprints should be accompanied by the exemption from this obligation for any person unable to provide biometric data because of physical incapacities in order to respect that person's dignity.
Izjema glede odvzema prstnih odtisov ne sme vplivati na varnost, ki jo nudi dovoljenje za prebivanje, niti ne sme stigmatizirati posameznikov z nečitljivimi prstnimi odtisi.
This exemption from providing fingerprints should neither decrease the security level of the residence permit nor stigmatise those individuals with unreadable fingerprints.
Razlog za izjemo se lahko shrani v čip v dovoljenju za prebivanje.
The reason for the exemption could be stored in the chip of the residence permit.
Kot smo že navedli, je z dostopom do e-storitev (e-uprava, zdravje, ugotavljanje istovetnosti itd.) z osebnimi izkaznicami in dovoljenji za prebivanje ter vključitvijo dodatnega čipa povezanih več pomembnih vprašanj.
As already pointed out, the question of allowing access to e-services (e-government, health, identification, etc) via ID cards and residence permits and the insertion of an additional chip raises several concerns.
V ugotovitvah, ki jih je odbor iz člena 6 sprejel februarja 2007, so nakazani možni odgovori glede tehničnih možnosti v zvezi z združljivostjo različnih vrst čipov
The Article 6 Committee's conclusions of February 2007 try to give answers as regards the various technical possibilities concerning compatibility between different kinds of chips
Predstavljene so tri možnosti: 1) brezkontaktni čip za biometrične podatke in kontaktni čip za nacionalno uporabo; 2) en sam brezkontaktni čip tako za nacionalne podatke kot za biometrične identifikatorje z jasno ločeno zgradbo in dostopom; 3) en sam čip z dvojnim vmesnikom, tj. brezkontaktnim za biometrične podatke in kontaktnim za nacionalne podatke. , na katerih bi bili shranjeni tako biometrični podatki kot nacionalne značilnosti.
Three options are to be considered: 1) a contactless chip for biometrics and a contact chip for national uses; 2) a single contactless chip for both national data and biometric identifiers, with clearly separated architecture and access; 3) a single chip with a dual interface, i.e. contactless for biometrics data and with contact for national data. storing both biometrics and national data.
Poročevalec se zaveda pomena tehničnih vprašanj, a vseeno želi izraziti obžalovanje nad tem, da besedilo ne obravnava vprašanja varnosti v sistemu, ki je sestavljen iz različnih delov.
The rapporteur recognises the importance of technical issues, but would like to stress his disappointment at the lack of any reference to the security level of a system that is made up of different parts.
Ne glede na tip čipa, ki bo izbran, in posledice, ki jih bo to imelo s tehničnega vidika
Independently of the choice made regarding the type of chip to be used and the technical implications
Denimo rok za sprejetje in izvedbo tehničnih specifikacij, zmogljivost shranjevanja, stroški izdelave in trajnost. , je enako pomembno, da bo izbrana rešitev zagotavljala visoko stopnjo varnosti občutljivih podatkov (kot so biometrični podatki).
Such as the deadline for adoption and implementation of the technical specifications, the storage capacity, the production costs and the durability. related to it, it is equally important to guarantee that any choice ensures a high level of security as far as sensitive data (e.g. biometrics) are concerned.
Ali bo v nasprotju s trenutnim stanjem možno zagotoviti, da se bodo storitve e-uprave izvajale v sorazmerno „varnem“ okolju?
Contrary to the current situation, can the use of e-government services be implemented in a relatively 'safe' environment?
Dokler na to vprašanje ne dobimo zadovoljivega odgovora, bi morali vprašanje vnosa podatkov za e-storitev v tej točki skrbno pretehtati, saj si ne smemo dovoliti prenagljenih rešitev, za katere bi morali kasneje priznati, da niso bile dovolj premišljene, da so bile predrage ali tehnološko zastarele, ali celo, da bi lahko ogrozile varnost občutljivih podatkov.
Until there is a satisfactory answer to this question, we should think carefully as regards the possibility of introducing e-services data at this point, since we cannot risk rushing into solutions which could force us to admit later on that we were not properly prepared, or that a given solution was in fact too expensive or technologically out-of-date or could compromise the security of sensitive data.
Pri vsem skupaj gre za zaupanje, ki ga imajo ljudje v uporabo biometrije.
Any such action would undermine the trust of all in biometrics.
Pripraviti bi bilo treba seznam meril, ki bi morala biti izpolnjena še pred uvedbo možnosti shranjevanja podatkov za e-storitve, denimo seznam z natančno opredeljenimi načini uporabe in podatki, ki se bodo hranili.
In fact, we should establish a list of criteria that should be met before introducing the possibility of storing e-services data - for instance, a limited list of purposes and data which will be stored.
Kot je navedeno v prvi uvodni izjavi predloga, je eden od ciljev amsterdamske pogodbe na Evropsko komisijo prenesti pravico do pobude z namenom sprejemanja ustreznih ukrepov na področju usklajene politike priseljevanja.
As was recalled in the first recital of the proposal, one of the aims of the Treaty of Amsterdam is to confer the right of initiative on the Commission for proposing necessary and relevant measures for a harmonised immigration policy.
Zato mora Evropska komisija jasno opredeliti, kateri organi bodo pristojni za izvajanje pregledov dovoljenj za prebivanje.
In order to do so, the Commission should provide Member States with a clear definition of which authorities will be competent for carrying out checks on residence permits.