natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropska unija ne pozna ne v svoji zakonodaji in ne v praksi skupne, vse splošno priznane opredelitve civilnega dialoga.
There is no single and universally applied definition of civil dialogue , either in EU law or in EU administrative practice.
Z izjemo nekaterih dokumentov Evropske komisije o posvetovanju in komunikacijski politiki v Uniji
With the exception of a few Commission documents on consultation and communication policy in the EU
Glej dokumente Komisije: Bela knjiga o evropski komunikacijski politiki (KOM(2006) 35); Načrt D za demokracijo, dialog in debato (KOM(2005) 494); Akcijski načrt za izboljšanje komunikacijske strategije v Evropi (SEC(2005) 985); Predlog sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi programa „Državljani za Evropo“ za spodbujanje dejavnega evropskega državljanstva za obdobje 2007-2013 ( KOM(2005)0116 ); „Krepitev kulture posvetovanja in dialoga – splošna načela in minimalni standardi za posvetovanje Komisije z zainteresiranimi stranmi““ ( KOM(2002)0704 ); Bela knjiga o upravljanju, 2001. ne obstajajo nobeni predpisi, ki bi določali strukturo, okvir ali načine civilnega dialoga.
See the following Commission documents: White Paper on a European communication policy ( COM(2006)0035 ); Plan-D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate ( COM(2005)0494 ); Action plan to improve communicating Europe by the Commission ( SEC(2005)0985 ); Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2007-2013 the programme “Citizens for Europe” to promote active European citizenship ( COM(2005)0116 ); Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue – General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission ( COM(2002)0704 ); White Paper on governance, 2001. , there are no rules governing the organisation of or the framework and methods for civil dialogue.
Razumevanje tega, kaj naj bi bil civilni dialog, prav tako prispeva k razdrobljenosti pristopov posameznih evropskih institucij.
The fact that the European institutions have different approaches to civil dialogue makes it even more difficult to pin the concept down.
Resni zadržki so bili izraženi v zvezi z zastopstvom nevladnih organizacij, povabljenih k sodelovanju v dialogu, s hermetičnim značajem, ki ga evropski državljani vidijo v delovanju Sveta, in s preveliko svobodo (ki naj bi si jo dovoljevala predvsem Komisija) pri organizaciji dialoga.
In this connection, major reservations have been express about, for instance, the representativeness of the non-governmental organisations invited to take part in the dialogue, the lack of public access to Council proceedings, and the excessive amount of freedom enjoyed, in particular, by the Commission as regards the manner in which the dialogue is conducted.
Poročevalka meni, da je bistvenega pomena, da se določi (ali predstavi) sam koncept civilnega dialoga na evropski ravni ter oblikuje predpise glede zastopstva civilne družbe, ki je udeležena v dialogu.
The rapporteur therefore considers it essential for the concept of civil dialogue to be defined (or described) at EU level and for rules governing the representativeness of civil society participants to be laid down.
Da bi se načelo zastopstva civilne družbe resnično začelo izvajati, je treba v dialog vključiti organizacije, s katerimi se državljani poistovetijo in ki najbolje, torej v največji meri in na najbolj usposobljen način, predstavljajo njihove interese.
The principle of representativeness could best be satisfied by involving in civil dialogue those civil society organisations with which the public identify and which best – i.e. most fully and competently – represent their interests.
Uspeh civilnega dialoga bo odvisen prav od zastopstva, ali drugače rečeno, od udeležbe vseh glavnih strani, ki jih tema dialoga zanima (institucije Unije; nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne oblasti; evropske politične stranke; nevladne organizacije in drugi predstavniki civilne družbe).
The success of civil dialogue will hang precisely on this principle of representativeness; in other words on the involvement of all key stakeholders in the areas covered by the dialogue (EU institutions; national, regional and local authorities; European political parties; non-governmental organisations and other civil society representatives).
Civilni dialog je že po svoji naravi dvostranski in vzajemen.
Civil dialogue is, by its very nature, two-sided and reciprocal.
Zato ne zadostuje, da se državljane obvesti o dejavnostih Unije, temveč jim je treba tudi prisluhniti.
So it is not enough for the EU simply to provide the public with information on its activities; it also needs to find the time to listen to what the public are saying.
Prav tako jim je treba dati zagotovila, da evropske institucije resno obravnavajo njihove zamisli in strahove, ki jih izražajo.
They must also be given the assurance that their ideas and concerns will be treated with respect and taken into account by the EU institutions.
V skladu z načelom vzajemnosti morajo udeleženci prejeti povratne informacije, torej morajo biti seznanjeni, kaj se je zgodilo s predlogi, ki so bili dani v dialogu.
Furthermore, the principle of reciprocity requires participants to be given feedback on the action taken on the proposals put forward during the dialogue.
Ali ne bi bilo treba prav tako okrepiti vpliv, ki ga imajo na odločanje v Uniji socialni partnerji?
This should give the social partners greater influence over the decisions taken within the EU.
Poleg prave izbire partnerjev je treba zagotoviti ravnovesje med zasebnim in javnim sektorjem in poskrbeti za enakopravno obravnavo predstavnikov družbenih organizacij in strokovnjakov.
What is more, with a view to the selection of partners, a balance needs to be struck between the public and private sectors and representatives of social organisations and experts need to be afforded equal treatment.
Načelo preglednosti.
Principle of transparency.
Evropske institucije morajo pri izbiri strank, ki jih povabijo k dialogu, zagotavljati največjo možno mero preglednosti.
When selecting the parties to be invited to take part in the dialogue, the EU institutions should act with the utmost transparency .
Zato poročevalka med drugim predlaga sistematično objavo seznamov organizacij, ki so sodelovale v posvetovanjih ter predstavile svoje stališče in predloge.
With a view this, the rapporteur proposes that, among other things, lists of the organisations that have been involved in consultations and have submitted their views and suggestions should be systematically published.
Takoj na začetku posvetovanja ali dialoga bi morala Unija imenovati osebo, ki bi bila pristojna za odnose s predstavniki civilnih družbenih organizacij.
When consultations are opened, the Union should appoint an EU contact person for civil society organisation representatives.
Načela civilnega dialoga
Rules governing the conduct of civil dialogue
Primerno je opozoriti na sporočilo Komisije o krepitvi kulture posvetovanja in dialoga (2002), ki opredeljuje temeljna načela v zvezi s posvetovanji, ki jih opravi Komisija.
Reference should be made here to the Commission's 2002 communication on a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue, which lays down basic principles for the conduct of public consultations by the Commission.
Načela iz sporočila se v glavnem osredotočajo na kakovost procesa posvetovanja in dialoga, ne govorijo pa o njegovem okviru in postopkih.
These principles primarily concern qualitative aspects of the consultation and dialogue process, but no mention is made of the framework and procedures for dialogue.
Zato poročevalka upa, da jih bo Komisija znova preučila in jih prilagodila sedanjim potrebam tako, da bodo lahko postala skupna vsem institucijam.
The rapporteur would therefore like the Commission to have another look at the principles and to tailor them to current requirements, with a view to them becoming common principles for all the institutions.
Ni dvoma, da igrajo nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi najpomembnejšo vlogo pri podpori in razvoju civilnega dialoga ter še zlasti pri vključevanje državljanov vanj.
National, regional and local authorities unquestionably have the most important role to play in supporting and fostering civil dialogue, in particular in involving the public in that dialogue.
Posvetovanje z državljani bi moralo potekati na vseh treh ravneh, njihovo mnenje, še posebej v zvezi z evropskimi vprašanji, pa bi moralo biti posredovano evropskim institucijam.
The public should be consulted at these three levels, and their views – particularly on European issues – should be forwarded to the EU institutions.
Poročevalka zato predlaga, da bi postali nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi zadolženi za spodbujanje civilnega dialoga in da bi se morali k njemu zateči čim pogosteje.
Accordingly, the rapporteur proposes that national, regional and local authorities be required to publicise civil dialogue and to have recourse to it wherever possible.
Evropski državljani se s tem, ko postanejo ena izmed strani v dialogu, seznanijo s praktičnimi dejavnostmi pri participativnem oblikovanju politike in lahko tako resnično uveljavljajo svoje pravice.
By becoming parties to such dialogue, EU citizens will become accustomed to the practice of participative democracy and will have a genuine opportunity to exercise their rights.
V luči začetka veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe je treba še posebej poudariti pobudo državljanov, imenovano „milijon podpisov”, ki je sedaj v obliki zakonodajnega predloga, predstavljenega Komisiji.
With a view to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, particular attention should be drawn to the citizens' initiative (one million signatures) provisions, under which a proposal for legislation may be submitted to the Commission.
Zahvaljujoč tej pobudi bodo imeli vsi akterji v demokratičnem življenju Unije (državljani in nevladne organizacije) možnost, da jasno izrazijo svoja pričakovanja do Unije in jih tudi uradno zabeležijo.
These provisions will enable anyone involved in the democratic life of the EU (individual citizens and non-governmental organisations) clearly and formally to tell the Union what they expect of it.
V duhu izboljšanja učinkovitosti civilnega dialoga želi poročevalka opozoriti na sledeče točke:
With a view to ensuring more effective civil dialogue , the rapporteur would also draw attention to the following:
Odpiranje Sveta Evropske unije: Olajšanje in poenostavitev dostopa do dokumentov Sveta sta bistvena pogoja za uspešnost dialoga s civilno družbo.
Openness on the part of the Council: enhanced, streamlined access to Council documents is of key importance to effective dialogue with civil society.
Poleg tega bi morale biti informacije v zvezi z delom posebnih delovnih skupin v večji meri dostopne Evropskemu parlamentu in civilni družbi.
Furthermore, information on the work of the various working parties should be made more readily available to the European Parliament and civil society.
V zvezi z mediji pa želi poročevalka opozoriti na veliki napredek, ki je bil dosežen na tem področju, še posebej začetek oddajanja programa "Europe by Satellite".
Significant progress has been made in this respect as regards the media, with, among other things, the launch of the Europe by Satellite channel.
Da bi lahko predvideli in razumeli javno mnenje (katerega značaj je še posebej zapleten, saj odraža nacionalne želje in politične izbire), je treba razviti tudi mehanizme, na primer ustanoviti evropske skupine strokovnjakov, za preučevanje pričakovanj in teženj evropskih državljanov.
Furthermore, with a view to predicting how the European public will react (which is a particularly complex matter, in view of the influence of national outlooks and political beliefs) and to understanding public reactions once they have happened, mechanisms such as European think tanks need to be put in place with a view to analysing public expectations and public opinion trends.
Poročevalka opozarja na uredbo Skupnosti v zvezi s političnimi strankami in fundacijami, ki izhaja iz prvega dela načrta D in naj bi pomembno prispevala k vključevanju državljanov v stalni in resnični dialog, ki bo dobro zabeležen.
In this connection, the rapporteur would draw attention to the EU regulation on political parties and foundations, which is the outcome of the first stage of Plan D and which has an important role to play in involving citizens in ongoing, genuine and substantive dialogue.
Še zlasti med kampanjo za evropske volitve 2009 bi bilo treba obravnavati evropska vprašanja.
During the 2009 European election campaign in particular, attention needs to be drawn to European issues.
Evropske državljane je treba prepričati, da jim bo udeležba na volitvah prek izvoljenih predstavnikov zagotovila večji vpliv pri sprejemanju odločitev na evropski ravni, še zlasti pri odločitvah, ki vplivajo na vsakdanje življenje.
EU citizens must be confident that voting in the elections will (through the Members that they elect) give them a significant say in EU decision-making, in particular in decisions that affect their daily lives.
Prav tako morajo biti državljani z gotovostjo prepričani, da evropske institucije ne bodo sprejele nobene odločitve, ki jih zadeva, brez posvetovanja z njim, torej brez predhodnega civilnega dialoga.
They also need to be safe in the belief that, in matters affecting them, the European institutions will not take any decisions without first consulting them (i.e. without engaging in civil dialogue).
Zaradi omenjenega ni dvoma, da bodo evropska sredstva, ki so namenjena za volitve 2009, ogromno prispevala k razvoju participativnega oblikovanja politike.
The EU funding earmarked for the 2009 elections therefore clearly represents an excellent investment in the expansion of participative democracy.
Kar zadeva nacionalni okvir (navade, izkušnje in nacionalne organizacijske sposobnosti), lahko vsakršna finančna podpora (tudi če je omejena), ki je namenjena dejavnim nevladnim organizacijam na nacionalni ravni, pomembno okrepi mehanizme civilnega dialoga.
All financial support – however limited it may be – for non-governmental organisations operating at national level can, depending on the national context (with particular reference to national traditions, experiences and organisational capacities), significantly strengthen civil dialogue mechanisms.
Ob koncu želi poročevalka spodbuditi k široki podpori pobudam, sproženim v okviru civilnega dialoga, ki so obrodile sadove in so bile uspešno vključene v evropski prostor (na primer Agora, ki je kraj, kjer mnenja izmenjujejo državljani in Parlament), ter k izvajanju novih skupnih medinstitucionalnih projektov in dejavnosti v okviru evropske komunikacijske politike.
Lastly, the rapporteur would urge that broad support be provided for those civil dialogue measures that have been a success and have become firmly established on the European scene (for example, the Agora, a forum for dialogue between citizens and Parliament), and would also call for new common, interinstitutional measures and projects in the field of European communication policy.
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 80/181/EGS o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic, ki se nanaša na merske enote
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 80/181/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (11915/3/2008 – C6‑0425/2008 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (11915/3/2008 – C6‑0425/2008 ),
UL C 297 E, 20.11.2008, str.
OJ C 297 E, 20.11.2008, p.
105. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0510 ),
105. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0510 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6‑0476/2008 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0476/2008 ),
Potem ko je Parlament v prvi obravnavi brez predlogov sprememb odobril predlog Komisije, je Svet sprejel skupno stališče, s katerim se dodajo nadaljnje določbe, ki odražajo spremembe v sistemu mednarodnih standardov in določajo, da mora Komisija deset let po začetku veljavnosti direktive o spremembi poročati o dogajanju v zvezi z direktivo 80/181/EGS, zlasti glede nemotenega delovanja notranjega trga in mednarodne trgovine.
Following the Parliament's approval of the Commission's proposal without amendment in First Reading, the Council adopted a Common Position which adds further provisions to reflect changes to the International Standards (SI) system and to provide for a Commission report-back on developments in relation to Directive 80/181/EEC, in particular as concerns the smooth functioning of the internal market and international trade, ten years after the entry into force of this amending directive.
S skupnim stališčem se torej vstavi nov člen 6b o poročilu Komisije o tem dogajanju in doda ustrezna nova uvodna izjava (4).
Accordingly, the Common Position has inserted a new Article 6b on the Commission report on these effects, and added a corresponding new recital (4).
Obenem Svet z novo uvodno izjavo (5) opozarja, da je treba na trgih tretjih držav bolj uveljaviti proizvode, označene zgolj v enotah mednarodnih standardov.
The Council has also drawn attention to the need to further the acceptance in third country markets of products labelled only in SI units, with a new recital (5).
Spremembe predloga Komisije so tehnične narave in s tem, ko se sklicujejo na dodatne nove merske enote (kelvin) ter opredeljujejo enoti „radian“ in „steradian“ za brezdimenzionalni, odražajo najnovejše dosežke v okviru sistema mednarodnih standardov, izpostavljene v resoluciji generalne konference za uteži in mere iz leta 2007.
The changes to the Commission proposal are technical and reflect developments within the SI system singled out in the resolution of the 2007 General Conference on Weights and Measures, by making reference to additional new units of measurement (kelvin), and by making the "radian" and "steridian" dimensionless.
Predsednik zato v imenu Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter v skladu s sklepom koordinatorjev z dne 24. junija 2008 priporoča, da Evropski parlament sprejme skupno stališče v drugi obravnavi brez predlogov sprememb.
On behalf of the Committee of Internal Market and Consumer Protection and pursuant to the Coordinator's decision of 24 June 2008, the Chair accordingly recommends the approval by the European Parliament of the Common position in second reading without amendment.
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu v zvezi z nekaterimi projekti, ki ustvarjajo dohodek
on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, in respect of certain revenue-generating projects
Postopek soodločanja (tretja obravnava)
***III Codecision procedure (third reading)
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ....................................7
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ................7
– ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta ( KOM(2008)0558 –13874/2008),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation ( COM(2008)0558 - 13874/2008),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za privolitev Parlamenta na podlagi prvega odstavka člena 161 Pogodbe ES ( C6-0387/2008 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 161, first paragraph, of the EC Treaty ( C6‑0387/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6-0477/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0477/2008 ),
Določbe člena 55 Uredbe št. 1083/2006 se nanašajo na projekte, ki ustvarjajo dohodek, pri njihovi uporabi pa so se pokazale težave glede učinkovitosti pri izvajanju.
The provisions of article 55 of Regulation No 1083/2006 refer to ‘revenue-generating project’ and its application revealed difficulties in an efficient implementation.
Pravzaprav so v primeru manjših operacij, sofinanciranih v skladu s temi določbami, ali v primeru manjših projektov, ki jih sofinancirata Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijski sklad, oziroma operacij, ki jih sofinancira Evropski socialni sklad, postopki spremljanja, ki jih je treba upoštevati – prihodki se lahko upoštevajo največ tri leta po zaključku operativnega programa – nesorazmerno upravno breme v primerjavi z zneski, in pomemben dejavnik tveganja pri izvajanju programov.
In fact, in the case of small operations co-financed by of those provisions in the case of small projects co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund or operations co-financed by the European Social Fund (ESF) or, the follow-up procedures to be complied with — revenue may be taken into account for up to three years after winding-up of the operational programme — would seem to be a disproportionate administrative burden compared with the amounts concerned, and an important risk factor in programme implementation.
Zato Komisija po posvetovanju z državami članicami ocenjuje, da je treba sprejeti spremembo Uredbe št. 1083/2006, in sicer samo člena 55(5), ki vsebuje samo dve točki: izključitev operacij, ki jih sofinancira ESF, iz določb člena 55 in določitev praga, pod katerim bodo projekti, sofinancirani iz ESRR ali Kohezijskega sklada, izključeni iz istega člena za izračun najvišjih upravičenih stroškov in spremljanja.
Therefore, following consultations with Member States, the Commission considers it necessary to adopt an amendment to Regulation No 1083/2006 limited to Article 55(5) and comprising only two points: exclusion of operations co-financed by the ESF from the scope of Article 55, and establishing of a threshold below which projects co-financed by the ERDF or Cohesion Fund would be similarly be excluded from the scope of Article 55, both for the purposes of calculating maximum eligible expenditure and for monitoring.
Druge določbe člena 55 ostanejo nespremenjene.
The other provisions of Article 55 remain unchanged.
Poleg tega je bila vključena klavzula, ki določa, da revidirani člen prične veljati za nazaj, in sicer od 1. avgusta 2006, saj je pomembno zagotoviti skupna izvedbena pravila za zadevne projekte v celotnem programskem obdobju.
Furthermore, as it is essential to guarantee common implementation rules for the projects concerned during the whole programming period, a retroactive clause has been included in order for the revised article to enter into force from 1 August 2006.
Tehnična revizija bi, kolikor je to mogoče, poenostavila upravljanje projektov, ki ustvarjajo dohodek, in sicer z zmanjšanjem upravnega bremena z upoštevanjem sorazmernosti.
This technical revision would simplify as much as possible the management of revenue-generating projects by lowering the administrative burden in the spirit of proportionality.
Poleg tega bo spremenjeni člen 55 nedvomno olajšal izvajanje in spremljanje pomembnih srednje velikih operacij na občutljivih političnih področjih, kot so okolje, socialno vključevanje, raziskave, konkurenčnost in energija, na ta način pa se bo izboljšala tudi učinkovitost strukturnih skladov.
Moreover, the so amended article 55 will undoubtedly facilitate both the implementation and the monitoring of significant medium-sized operations in sensible policy fields such as the environment, social inclusion, research, competitiveness, innovation and energy, thus improving the use and the effectiveness of Structural Funds.