natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kot določa okvirni sklep Sveta o preprečevanju trgovine z ljudmi in boju proti njej ter varstvu žrtev, ki razveljavlja Okvirni sklep 2002/629/PNZ, mora vsako ukrepanje Unije na tem področju spoštovati temeljne pravice in upoštevati načela, uveljavljena zlasti z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (Listina EU) ter Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP), še zlasti človekovo dostojanstvo.
As mentioned in the Council Framework Decision on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting victims, repealing Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA, ‘any action of the Union in this field must respect fundamental rights and observe the principles recognized in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (EU Charter) and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (EHCR), notably human dignity’.
Prav tako je rečeno, da bi morala biti vsaka odločba, ki je namenjena pomoči žrtvam pri konkretnem uveljavljanju njihovih pravic v kazenskem postopku, kot so ukrepi pomoči, psihološka pomoč in pravno svetovanje, položaj žrtev okrepiti in bolj prispevati k spoštovanju njihovega dostojanstva.
It is also mentioned that every provision aimed at supporting victims in the concrete exercise of their rights in criminal proceedings, such as assistance measures, psychological assistance and legal counselling, should empower them and contribute to strengthening respect for their dignity.
Poročevalca menita, da je nujno zagotoviti zaščito žrtev, ki bi jim povrnila dostojanstvo in spoštovanje, kadar se odločijo za selitev v drugo državo ali ko v drugi državi članici že bivajo.
The rapporteurs consider it imperative to include protection for victims that aims to restore their dignity and the respect due to them as human beings, whenever they have decided to move to another country or are already living in another Member State.
Direktiva ščiti osebe, ki so bile žrtve ravnanja ene osebe.
The directive protects victims who have been mistreated by one single person.
Primeri pa kažejo, da žrtvi pogosto grozi ali škoduje več oseb.
Reality, however, shows that more than one person could threaten or harm another person.
Če se sodno preganja skupino oseb in so bili uvedeni zaščitni ukrepi, mora evropska odredba o zaščiti, če je bila izdana, zajemati tudi zaščito pred nasiljem več oseb.
If a judicial court is prosecuting a group of people and protective measures have been imposed, the European protection order, if it has been issued, should also cover protection against violence committed by a group of people.
V pobudi skupine držav članic ni predvidena moralna podpora, ki bi morala biti vsebovana v direktivi.
This initiative from a group of Member States fails to provide for moral assistance, which should be included in the directive.
Žrtve, ki so zaradi nasilja utrpele moralno škodo, morajo imeti na voljo ustrezne informacije in pomoč, da si bodo lahko ustvarile novo življenje, pri čemer jih bodo še naprej varovali uvedeni zaščitni ukrepi, omenjeno pa jim je treba zagotoviti, še preden se odločijo za selitev v drugo državo članico.
Victims who have been morally damaged through violence of any kind whatsoever need to be provided with the right information and assistance on how they can start a new life while not losing the protection measures which have been imposed, even before they have the idea of moving to another Member State.
Pomoč jim je treba zagotavljati v celotnem procesu.
Throughout the process this assistance should be considered.
Poročilo je delo dveh poročevalcev, ki sta skušala zagotoviti, da bo postala evropska odredba o zaščiti trdno orodje, ki bo nudilo varno zatočišče žrtvam nasilja prek meja v vseh državah članicah.
This report is the result of two rapporteurs working to ensure that the European protection order is a strong instrument in providing a safer haven for victims of violence across Member States’ borders.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi o pobudi za direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o evropski odredbi o zaščiti (00002/2010 – C7‑0006/2010 – 2010/0802(COD) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis for the Initiative for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Protection Order (00002/2010 – C7‑0006/2010 – 2010/0802(COD) )
Spoštovana kolegica, spoštovani kolega,
Dear Colleagues,
Predlog evropske odredbe o zaščiti temelji na skupni pobudi za direktivo dvanajstih držav članic EU
The proposal for a European protection order is based on a joint initiative of twelve EU Member States
Te države članice so Belgija, Bolgarija, Estonija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Madžarska, Poljska, Portugalska, Romunija, Finska in Švedska. , predloženi januarja 2010
The Member States concerned are Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, Spain, France, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Finland and Sweden. for a directive, presented in January 2010
Glej dokument PE-CONS 2/10 z dne 22. januarja 2010. .
See document PE-CONS 2/10 of 22 January 2010. .
Cilj direktive je olajšati in okrepiti zaščito žrtev kaznivih dejanj ali morebitnih žrtev kaznivih dejanj, ki se selijo iz ene države EU v drugo, zlasti pri kaznivih dejanjih, kjer je ogroženo življenje žrtve, njena telesna in duševna celovitost, spolna nedotakljivost ali osebna svoboda.
The aim of the directive is to facilitate and enhance the protection granted to victims of crime, or possible victims of crime, who move between EU Member States, in particular crimes which may endanger the victims' life, physical, psychological and sexual integrity or their personal liberty.
Končni cilj je preprečiti nova kazniva dejanja in ublažiti posledice prejšnjih kaznivih dejanj.
The ultimate goal is to avoid new acts of crime and to mitigate the consequences of previous acts of crime.
Predlagana pravna podlaga za osnutek direktive je člen 82(1)(d) PDEU o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah.
The legal basis proposed for the draft directive is Article 82(1)(d) TFEU, relating to judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
Na Odbor za pravne zadeve ste 7. oktobra 2010 naslovili pismo, v katerem ste zaprosili za mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga.
By letter of 7 October 2010, you asked the Legal Affairs Committee to give its opinion on the legal basis of the proposal.
Z Lizbonsko pogodbo je bil odpravljen sistem stebrov in se sedaj praktično vsa zakonodaja, ki sodi v področje svobode, varnosti in pravice, vključno s členom 82 PDEU o sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah iz poglavja 4 naslova V, sprejema po rednem zakonodajnem postopku.
The Lisbon Treaty did away with the former pillar system and now virtually all legislation coming within what is now the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, including Article 82 TFEU on cooperation in criminal matters in Chapter 4 of Title V, has to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure.
Na tem področju ostaja omejena izjema k splošnemu pravilu, da zgolj Komisija podaja zakonodajne pobude, v členu 76 PDEU, v skladu s katerim lahko četrtina držav članic poda zakonodajno pobudo na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah in policijskega sodelovanja (ter na področju upravnega sodelovanja, povezanega s tema področjema).
In this field there remains a limited exception to the general rule that the Commission has the sole right to initiate legislation, namely under Article 76 TFEU, which provides that a quarter of the Member States may initiate legislation in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation (and in the field of administrative cooperation relating thereto).
Svet je svoj prvi predlog direktive o evropski odredbi o zaščiti žrtev predstavil 5. januarja 2010
The Council presented its first proposal for a directive for a European protection order for victims on 5 January 2010
Glej dokument 17513/09 z dne 5. januarja 2010. .
See document 17513/09 of 5 January 2010. .
Velik del vsebine in sestave pravne podlage predloga Sveta temelji na vprašalniku, na katerega je oktobra 2009 odgovorilo dvajset držav članic EU
Much of the content and the construction of the legal basis of the Council’s proposal were based on a questionnaire which was answered in October 2009 by 20 EU Member States
Glej dokument 5002/10 z dne 6. januarja 2010. .
See document 5002/10 of 6 January 2010. .
S pobudo naj bi se oblikovala evropska odredba o zaščiti žrtev nasilja, s katero bi zaščitne ukrepe, sprejete v eni državi članici priznavala, določala in izvajala sodišča druge države članice.
The initiative seeks to create a European Protection Order for victims of violence whereby protective measures adopted in one Member State can be recognised, administered and enforced by the courts of a second Member State.
S takim sistemom zaščiteni osebi ne bi bilo treba začeti vzporednih postopkov v državi članici, v katero se oseba (žrtev) namerava preseliti ali se je preselila.
Such a system would obviate any need for a protected person to take parallel proceedings in a Member State to which that person (the victim) moves or has moved.
Osnova predloga je, da se poleg pravice do spoštovanja, nadomestila za povzročeno škodo in kaznovanja storilca na podlagi pravičnega sojenja za vse udeležene strani, žrtvi kaznivega dejanja prizna tudi pravica do zaščite pred tem, da postane žrtev novega kaznivega dejanja, zlasti s strani istega storilca.
The rationale of the proposal is that victims of crime not only have a right to respect, to compensation for the damage caused to them and to see the perpetrator punished on the basis of a fair trial fully guaranteeing the rights of all parties, but are also entitled to be protected from being victims of another offence, particularly by the same person.
V skladu s tem bi morali biti na razpolago ustrezni mehanizmi za preprečevanje ponavljajočih se kaznivih dejanj ali drugih, morda celo bolj resnih kaznivih dejanj, ki jih storilec zagreši nad isto žrtvijo.
Accordingly, there should be appropriate mechanisms designed to prevent a repeat offence or a different, perhaps more serious offence, by the same offender against the same victim.
Taka ponavljajoča se kazniva dejanja so zlasti pogosta na področju nasilja na podlagi spola, čeprav se pojavljajo tudi v drugih oblikah kriminala, na primer pri trgovini z ljudmi ali spolnem izkoriščanju mladoletnih oseb.
Such repeat offences are particularly frequent in the case of gender-based violence, although they also occur in other forms of crime such as human trafficking or sexual exploitation of minors.
V vseh državah članicah so predvideni ukrepi za zaščito življenj žrtev, njihove telesne in duševne celovitosti, spolne nedotakljivosti ter osebne svobode, vendar so zaenkrat ti ukrepi učinkoviti zgolj na ozemlju države članice, ki jih je sprejela, zato so žrtve brez zaščite, če zapustijo državo.
All the Member States provide for measures to protect victims' lives, physical, mental and sexual integrity and freedom, but at present such measures are effective only on the territory of the State which adopted them and they leave victims unprotected when they cross borders.
Zato zaščita, ki jo država članica nudi žrtvi kaznivega dejanja, ne bi smela biti omejena zgolj na njeno ozemlje, temveč bi morala žrtev imeti možnost, da jo uveljavlja kjerkoli v EU.
The protection which a Member State affords to crime victims should therefore not be confined to its territory but should apply to victims wherever they go in the EU.
Razpoložljivi podatki (zgolj za kazniva dejanja zaradi spola) kažejo, da so bili za več kot 100.000 žensk, ki prebivajo v EU, izdani različni zaščitni ukrepi, ki so jih sprejele države članice kot odgovor na nasilje na podlagi spola.
On the basis of the figures available, purely for gender-based offences, it would seem that over 100 000 women residing in the EU are covered by protective measures of various kinds adopted by Member States in response to gender-based violence.
V podatkih niso upoštevane žrtve trgovine z ljudmi in drugih kaznivih dejanj.
These figures do not take account victims of human trafficking and other offences.
Glede na dejstvo, da se storilci kaznivih dejanj brez težav gibljejo po EU, je prav in ustrezno omogočiti, da se obseg zaščitnih ukrepov, sprejetih v eni državi članici, razširi, da bi ščitili žrtev, ki želi uveljavljati pravico do prostega gibanja.
Given the ease with which perpetrators of crime can move within the EU, it would seem only right and proper that it should be possible to enable the scope of protective measures adopted in one Member State to be extended so as to protect a victim who wishes to exercise her right of free movement.
Če te možnosti ne bo, bodo žrtve postavljene pred težko izbiro med uveljavljanjem pravice državljanov Unije do prostega gibanja in pravice žrtve do zaščite.
Failing such action, victims would face a stark choice between forgoing their right of free movement as Union citizens or forgoing their right to protection.
Parlament je večkrat pozval države članice, naj opravijo pregled zakonodajnih postopkov in ukrepajo za odpravo ovir, zaradi katerih ženske ne morejo pridobiti pravnega varstva
Parliament has repeatedly called on the Member States to review the administration of legal procedures and take action to remove barriers which prevent women from obtaining legal protection.
Glej resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. septembra 1997 o potrebi, da se na celotnem območju Evropske unije sproži kampanjo za nično stopnjo strpnosti do nasilja nad ženskami (UL C 304, 6.10.1997, str.
See Parliament’s resolution of 16 September 1997 on the need to establish a European Union-wide campaign for zero tolerance of violence against women (OJ C 304, 6.10.1997, p.
Poudarjamo tudi, da je bil zakonodajalec EU na področju zaščite žrtev aktiven.
It is further pointed out that the EU legislator has not been inactive in the sphere of victim protection.
UL L 82, 22.3.2001, str.
OJ L 82, 22.03.2001, p.1. and
Pravna služba Sveta je na zahtevo Sveta 17. februarja 2010 izdala mnenje
On 17 February 2010, the Council’s Legal Service delivered an opinion
Glej dokument Sveta 6516/10 z dne 17. februarja 2010. , v katerem je ugotovila, da se člen 82(1)(d) PDEU lahko uporabi kot pravna podlaga za osnutek direktive, vendar bi bilo treba pobudo ustrezno priznati kot instrument priznavanja sodnih odločb, za pravno podlago pa uporabiti tudi člen 82(1)(a) PDEU.
See Council document 6516/10 of 17 February 2010. , at the Council’s request, in which it concludes that Article 82(1)(d) TFEU can be relied upon as legal basis for the draft Directive, but that in order to give the initiative its due as an instrument of recognition of judicial decisions, it would be appropriate to refer also to also 82(1)(a) TFEU.
Stališče pristojnih odborov
The position of the competent committees
Na omenjeni skupni seji Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ter Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve dne 29. septembra 2010 so bili po orientacijskem glasovanju o pooblastilu poročevalcem za pogajanja s Svetom, da bi se dosegel kompromis ob prvi obravnavi, sprejeti številni predlogi sprememb k predlagani direktivi.
At the above-mentioned joint meeting of 29 September 2010 of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, a large number of amendments to the proposed directive were adopted following an orientation vote to establish the rapporteurs' mandate for negotiating with the Council with a view to reaching a compromise in first reading.
S prvim od obravnavanih predlogov sprememb bi se člen 82(1)(a) PDEU o priznavanju vseh oblik sodb in sodnih odločb dodal kot dodatna pravna podlaga.
Amendment 1 of the amendments in question would add Article 82(1)(a) TFEU, concerning the recognition of all forms of judgments and judicial decisions as an additional legal basis.
Seveda se to nanaša na sodbe in sodne odločbe v kazenskih zadevah.
Clearly this refers to judgments and judicial decisions in criminal matters.
Istočasno sta bila sprejeta dva druga predloga sprememb (18 in 84), ki izrecno določata, da predlagana direktiva ne bo vplivala na izvajanje že obstoječih instrumentov vzajemnega priznavanja v civilnih zadevah, jih ne bo spreminjala ali nadomestila.
At the same time, other amendments (Amendments 18 and 84) were adopted which explicitly state that the proposed directive will not affect the application of, nor amend or replace, existing mutual recognition instruments in civil matters.
V obrazložitvenem memorandumu k osnutku poročila z dne 20. maja 2010 sta poročevalca izjavila, da „se na splošno strinjata s predlogom Sveta“, poudarila pa sta, da je področje uporabe te pobude namenoma široko in da bi se zato evropska odredba o zaščiti morala uporabljati za vse žrtve kaznivih dejanj, kot so žrtve trgovine z ljudmi, pohabljanja ženskih spolnih organov, prisilnih porok, zločinov iz časti in incesta, nasilja na podlagi spola, priče in žrtve terorizma ter organiziranega kriminala, ne glede na njihovo starost ali spol, kadar je napadalec znan.
In the explanatory memorandum to the draft report of 20 May 2010 the rapporteurs state that they "largely agree with the Council’s proposal", while emphasising that the scope of the initiative is deliberately wide and that a European protection order "should be applicable to all victims of crime, such as victims of human trafficking, victims of female genital mutilations, forced marriages, honour killings, incest, gender violence, witnesses, victims of terrorism and victims of organised crime, regardless of the age or sex of the victim, where there is an identified aggressor".
Prav tako je v osnutku poročila zapisano, da so predlogi sprememb namenjeni izboljšanju predlaganega besedila z zagotavljanjem neprekinjene pravne zaščite in omejevanjem razlogov za nepriznavanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti ali njeno zavrnitev.
It is further stated that the proposed amendments aim at improving the proposed text by "ensuring continuity of legal protection" and "limiting the reasons for refusal to recognise, or rejection of, a European protection order".
V direktivi je predlagana pravna podlaga člen 82(1)(d) PDEU.
The legal basis put forward for the proposed directive is Article 82(1) point (d) of the TFEU.
Pristojna odbora predlagata, da se pravni podlagi doda točka (a) istega člena.
The competent committees propose adding point (a) of the same article to the legal basis.
Člen 82 PDEU
Article 82 TFEU
(a) določitev pravil in postopkov za zagotovitev priznavanja vseh oblik sodb in sodnih odločb v celotni Uniji ;
( a ) lay down rules and procedures for ensuring recognition throughout the Union of all forms of judgments and judicial decisions ;
(b) preprečevanje in reševanje sporov o pristojnosti med državami članicami;
(b) prevent and settle conflicts of jurisdiction between Member States;
(c) spodbujanje usposabljanja sodnikov in sodnega osebja;
(c) support the training of the judiciary and judicial staff;
(d) lažje sodelovanje med sodnimi ali drugimi enakovrednimi organi držav članic pri kazenskih postopkih in izvrševanju odločb .
(d) facilitate cooperation between judicial or equivalent authorities of the Member States in relation to proceedings in criminal matters and the enforcement of decisions .
Analiza cilja in vsebine
Analysis of aim and content
Sodišče Evropske unije potrjuje
As the Court of Justice has confirmed,
Sodba z dne 3. septembra 2009 v zadevi Parlament proti Svetu (C-166/07, še neobjavljena v ZOdl). , da mora izbira pravne podlage ukrepa temeljiti na objektivnih dejavnikih, ki vzdržijo sodno presojo, med katerimi sta zlasti cilj in vsebina ukrepa.
Judgment of 3 September 2009 in Case C-166/07 Parliament v. Council , not yet reported in the ECR. the choice of the legal basis for a measure must rest on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review, including, in particular, the aim and the content of the measure.
Vprašanje, na katerega je treba odgovoriti, je obsežno, zato se ga je treba lotiti z analizo, na kakšen način naj bi evropska odredba o zaščiti delovala.
Given the scope of the question which has to be answered, it is necessary to approach this question by analysing how the European Protection Order is intended to work.
Kaj je evropska odredba o zaščiti?
What is a European Protection Order?
Evropska odredba o zaščiti je sodna odločba v zvezi z zaščitnimi ukrepi, ki jo izda država članica, in katere cilj je drugi državi članici olajšati, da v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo po potrebi sprejme zaščitne ukrepe za zaščito življenja, telesne in duševne celovitosti, osebne svobode ali spolne nedotakljivosti osebe
A European Protection Order (hereinafter “EPO”) is a judicial decision relating to a protection measure issued by a Member State and aiming at facilitating the taking by another Member State, where appropriate, of a protection measure under its own national law with a view to safeguarding the life, physical and psychological integrity, freedom or sexual integrity of a person
Člen 1 predloga direktive. .
Article 1 of the proposed directive. .
Torej se evropska odredba o zaščiti lahko izda zgolj, če je država izdajateljica že izdala zaščitni ukrep.
Consequently, an EPO may be issued only where the issuing State has already issued a protection measure.
Zaščitni ukrep je odločba, ki jo sprejme pristojni organ države članice, in ki za povzročitelja nevarnosti uvaja eno ali več obveznosti ali prepovedi iz člena 2(2), pod pogojem, da kršitev teh obveznosti ali prepovedi predstavlja kaznivo dejanje po zakonodaji zadevne države članice oziroma se lahko kaznuje z odvzemom prostosti v tej državi članici.
A protection measure is a decision adopted by a competent authority of a Member State imposing on a person causing danger one or more of the obligations or prohibitions referred to in Article 2(2), provided that the infringement of such obligations or prohibitions constitutes a criminal offence under the law of the Member State concerned or may otherwise be punishable by a deprivation of liberty in that Member State.
Prepovedi in obveznosti iz člena 2(2) so naslednje:
The prohibitions and obligations set out in Article 2(2) are as follows:
(a) obveznost, da v nekatere kraje ali opredeljena območja, kjer zaščitena oseba prebiva ali jih obiskuje, ne sme vstopiti;
(a) an obligation not to enter certain localities, places or defined areas where the protected person resides or that he visits;
(b) obveznost, da po potrebi ob določenem času ostane na določenem kraju;
(b) an obligation to remain in a specified place, where applicable during specified times;
(c) obveznost, ki zajema omejitve glede zapustitve ozemlja države izdajateljice;
(c) an obligation containing limitations on leaving the territory of the issuing State;
(d) obveznost izogibanja zaščitenim osebam; ali
(d) an obligation to avoid contact with the protected person; or
(e) prepoved približevanja zaščiteni osebi na krajšo razdaljo od predpisane.
(e) a prohibition on approaching the protected person closer than a prescribed distance.
Izdaja evropske odredbe o zaščiti
Issue of an EPO
Evropska odredba o zaščiti se lahko izda kadarkoli, ko namerava zaščitena oseba zapustiti državo izdajateljico, oziroma jo je zapustila in namerava oditi v drugo državo članico, oziroma je tja odšla.
An EPO may be issued at any moment when the protected person intends to leave or has left the issuing State for another Member State.
Izdaja evropske odredbe o zaščiti je odvisna od predhodnega sprejetja zaščitnega ukrepa v državi izdajateljici.
The issue of an EPO is conditional upon the prior adoption of a protection measure in the issuing State.
Evropsko odredbo o zaščiti lahko izda zgolj sodni organ ali drugi pristojni organ
An EPO may be issued only by a judicial or other competent authority
V skladu s členom 4 morajo države članice obvestiti generalni sekretariat Sveta o svojih organih, pristojnih za izdajo ali priznavanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
Under Article 4, Member States have to notify the General Secretariat of the Council of their authority or authorities competent to issue and recognise EPOs.