natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
17. poziva k ohranjanju finančne podpore za ukrepe v državah v razvoju in sosednjih državah, da se spodbuja enakost med spoloma in pravice žensk, kakor so podrobno opredeljene v Pekinški deklaraciji in izhodiščih za ukrepanje ter v Konvenciji ZN o odpravi vseh oblik diskriminacije žensk.
Calls for the maintenance of financial support for actions in developing countries and in Europe’s neighbouring countries to promote gender equality and women’s rights as detailed in the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action and the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 708/2007 o uporabi tujih in lokalno neprisotnih vrst v ribogojstvu
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 708/2007 concerning the use of alien and locally absent species in aquaculture
Poročevalec: João Ferreira
Rapporteur: João Ferreira
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2009)0541 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2009)0541 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 in člena 299(2) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7–0272/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 37 and Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0272/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3), člena 43(2) in člena 349(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) , Article 43(2) and Article 349, first paragraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A7–0184/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A7‑0184/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ter zlasti člena 37 in člena 299(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community , and in particular Article 37 and Article 299(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 43(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , and in particular Article 43(2) thereof,
Glede na mnenje, ki ga je Odbor za pravne zadeve podal v skladu s členom 37 poslovnika EP, poročevalec meni, da je člen 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju EU edina primerna pravna podlaga.
In line with the opinion delivered by the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 37 of the EP’s Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur considers the appropriate legal basis to be Article 43(2) TFEU only.
(5a) Komisija bi morala imeti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe sprejema delegirane akte glede okvirnih smernic iz člena 6, postopkov in najnujnejših podatkov, ki se preučijo pri oceni tveganja za okolje, predvideni v členu 9, pogojev za karanteno iz člena 15, seznama vrst iz člena 2(5), določenega v prilogah I, II, III in IV, ter za določanje pogojev iz člena 24(2), ki so potrebni za dodajanje vrst v prilogo IV.
(5a) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty in respect of the indicative guidelines referred to in Article 6, the procedures and minimum elements to be addressed in an environmental risk assessment as provided for in Article 9, the conditions of quarantine as provided for in Article 15, the list of species referred to in Article 2(5), as laid down in Annexes I, II, III and IV and for the purpose of specifying the conditions necessary for adding species to Annex IV, as referred in Article 24(2).
Še zlasti je pomembno, da se Komisija med pripravljalnim delom ustrezno posvetuje, tudi na ravni strokovnjakov.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at experts’ level.
Predlog spremembe je namenjen uskladitvi osnovnega zakonodajnega akta s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Amendment to bring the basic legislative act into line with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Člen 2 – odstavek 7 – pododstavek 2
Article 2 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Države članice v skladu z opredelitvijo iz člena 3(3) oblikujejo seznam zaprtih ribogojskih objektov na svojem ozemlju in ga redno posodabljajo.
Member States shall set up a list of closed aquaculture facilities in their territory complying with the definition of the Article 3(3) and update that list regularly.
Seznam se objavi na spletni strani, vzpostavljeni v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 535/2008.
The list shall be published on the website set up in accordance with Article 4(2) of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 535/2008.
Države članice v skladu z opredelitvijo iz člena 3(3) oblikujejo seznam zaprtih ribogojskih objektov na svojem ozemlju in ga redno posodabljajo.
Member States shall set up a list of closed aquaculture facilities in their territory complying with the definition in Article 3(3) and update that list regularly.
V šestih mesecih od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe se seznam objavi na spletni strani, vzpostavljeni v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 535/2008.
Within six months of the date of entry into force of this Regulation , the list shall be published on the website set up in accordance with Article 4(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 535/2008.
Po predlogu Komisije seznama ni potrebno objaviti na določen dan, vendar se zdi priporočljivo, če ne kar bistveno določiti rok.
The Commission proposal does not require the list to be published on a set date, but it would be advisable, not to say essential, to specify a deadline.
Šestmesečni časovni okvir, ki ga je predlagal Svet, se zdi primeren.
The six-month time-frame being proposed by the Council seems reasonable.
Člen 1 – točka 2 – točka (a)
Article 1 – point 2 – point a
Člen 3 – točka 3 – uvodni del
Article 3 – point 3 – introductory part
Da pri izvajanju uredbe ne bi prihajalo do morebitnih nejasnosti, je treba razložiti, da se zaprti ribogojski objekti obravnavajo kot takšni samo, če se nahajajo na kopnem (pri tem se ohrani opredelitev, določena v projektu IMPASSE).
To avoid possible ambiguities when the regulation is implemented, it should be made clear that closed aquaculture facilities will be treated as such if, and only if, they are situated on land (in keeping with the definition established by the IMPASSE project).
Člen 3 – točka 3 – točka (a)
Article 3 – point 3 – point a
(a) v katerem se ribogojstvo opravlja v vodnem gojišču, ki vključuje ponovno kroženje vode in izpust(-e), ki ni(-so) nikakor povezan(-i) z odprtimi vodami, preden se preventivno pregleda(-jo) , filtrira(-jo) ali precedi(-jo) in prečisti(-jo) za preprečevanje izpusta trdnih odpadkov v vodno okolje in pobega gojenih vrst in negojenih vrst, ki bi lahko preživele in se naprej razmnoževale, iz objektov,
(a) where aquaculture is conducted in an aquatic medium, which involves recirculation of water and with a discharge(s) that does not connect in any way to open waters prior of being screened, filtered or percolated and treated to prevent the release of solid waste to the aquatic environment and the escape of the farmed species and of non-target species from the facility that might survive and subsequently reproduce;
(a) v katerem se ribogojstvo opravlja v vodnem gojišču, ki vključuje ponovno kroženje vode in izpust(-e), ki ni(-so) nikakor povezan(-i) z odprtimi vodami, preden se preventivno pregleda(-jo) in filtrira(-jo) ali precedi(-jo) in prečisti(-jo) za preprečevanje izpusta trdnih odpadkov v vodno okolje in pobega gojenih vrst in negojenih vrst, ki bi lahko preživele in se naprej razmnoževale, iz objektov,
(a) where aquaculture is conducted in an aquatic medium, which involves recirculation of water and with a discharge(s) that does not connect in any way to open waters prior of being screened and filtered or percolated and treated to prevent the release of solid waste to the aquatic environment and the escape of the farmed species and of non-target species from the facility that might survive and subsequently reproduce;
Beseda „in“ je dodana zaradi jasnejše navedbe različnih nujnih elementov v postopku čiščenja vode.
Addition of the word " and " to spell out more the various mandatory elements of the water cleaning process.
To je hkrati v skladu z osnutkom stališča Sveta.
This is also in line with the draft Council position.
Člen 3 – točka 3 – točka (b)
Article 3 – point 3 – point b
(b) ki preprečuje izgube na gojiščih zaradi okoljskih dejavnikov, kot so poplave , plenilci (npr. ptice), kraje in vandalizem, ter zagotavlja ustrezno odstranjevanje mrtvih organizmov;“
(b) which prevents farm losses due to environmental factors , such as flooding , predators (e.g. birds), theft and vandalism and ensures appropriate disposal of dead organisms;
(b) ki preprečuje izgube gojenih osebkov ali biološkega materiala, vključno s patogeni, zaradi dejavnikov, kot so poplave – zaradi katerih mora biti objekt na varni razdalji od odprtih voda – in plenilci (npr. ptice), ter na ustrezen način preprečuje izgube zaradi kraj in vandalizma, hkrati pa zagotavlja ustrezno odstranjevanje mrtvih organizmov;
(b) which prevents losses of reared specimens or biological material, including pathogens, due to factors such as flooding – for which reason the facility must be situated at a safe distance from open waters – and predators (e.g. birds) and, in a reasonable way , prevents losses due to theft and vandalism, while ensuring appropriate disposal of dead organisms;
V besedilu je treba določiti obe vrsti izgub, do katerih lahko pride, in značilnost dejavnikov, ki lahko k temu prispevajo; poleg tega je zelo težko zagotoviti, da sploh ne bi prišlo do kraj in vandalizma.
The text should specify both the kinds of losses that might occur and the nature of potential contributory factors, furthermore, it would be extremely difficult to provide a foolproof guarantee of protection against theft and vandalism.
(1a) V členu 4 se doda naslednji odstavek:
( 1 a) T he following paragraph is added to Article 4:
„Pristojni organi v državah članicah so odgovorni za spremljanje in nadzor, ki zagotavljata, da zaprti ribogojski objekti ustrezajo zahtevam iz točke 3 člena 3, in jamčita, da se prevoz iz takega objekta ali v njega izvaja v skladu s pogoji, ki so takšni, da preprečujejo pobeg eksotičnih ali neciljnih vrst.”
"The competent authorities in the Member States shall be responsible for monitoring and supervising so as to ensure that closed aquaculture facilities comply with the requirements laid down in point 3 of Article 3, and also for ensuring that transport from or to those facilities takes place in conditions that are such as to prevent the escape of exotic or non-target species."
Omogočanje postopka vnosa eksotičnih vrst je treba dopolniti s potrebnimi ukrepi za nadzor objektov, ki ga morajo izvajati pristojni organi države članice, da se zagotovi učinkovito izpolnjevanje vseh tehničnih zahtev, ki so jih predlagali strokovnjaki (zlasti v okviru projekta IMPASSE).
The facilitation of the process of introduction of exotic species needs to be complemented by the necessary measures for supervising the facilities on the part of the competent Member State authorities, the aim being to ensure effective compliance with all technical requirements put forward by the specialists (especially in the context of the IMPASSE project).
V primeru rutinskega vnosa je izpust vodnih organizmov v ribogojski objekt dovoljen brez karantene ali poskusnega izpusta, razen če v izjemnih primerih pristojni organ na podlagi izrecnega mnenja svetovalnega odbora ne odloči drugače.
In the case of routine introductions, the release of aquatic organisms into aquaculture facilities shall be allowed without quarantine or pilot release, unless, in exceptional cases, the competent authority decides otherwise on the basis of specific advice given by the advisory committee.
Premiki iz zaprtega ribogojskega objekta v odprt ribogojski objekt se ne štejejo za rutinske .
Movements from a closed aquaculture facility to an open aquaculture facility shall not be regarded as routine .
Premiki iz zaprtega ribogojskega objekta v odprt ribogojski objekt se obravnavajo kot rutinski ali nerutinski premiki v skladu z določbami členov 6 in 7 .
Movements from a closed aquaculture facility to an open aquaculture facility shall be considered as routine or non-routine movements in accordance with the provisions of Articles 6 and 7 .
Člen 1 – točka 3 a (novo) – točka (a)
Article 1 – point 3 a (new) – point a
(3a) Člen 24 se spremeni kot sledi:
(3a) Article 24 is amended as follows:
Komisija lahko na podlagi delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 24a in pod pogoji iz členov 24b in 24c sprejme spremembe prilog I, II, III in IV te uredbe, da bi jih prilagodila tehničnemu in znanstvenemu napredku, ter zahteve za pogoje iz odstavka 2, ki so potrebni za dodajanje vrst v prilogo IV.”
The Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 24a and subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 24b and 24c, amendments to Annexes I, II, III and IV to this Regulation in order to adapt them to technical and scientific progress as well as specifications for the conditions necessary for adding species to Annex IV, as provided for in paragraph 2. ”
Člen 1 – točka 3 a (novo) – točka (b)
Article 1 – point 3 a (new) – point b
Člen 24 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 24 – paragraph1 a (new)
(b) Doda se nov odstavek:
(b) A new paragraph is inserted as follows:
Komisija pri sprejemanju takšnih delegiranih aktov ravna v skladu z določbami te uredbe.
When adopting such delegated acts, the Commission shall act in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.”
Člen 1 – točka 3 a (novo) – točka (c)
Article 1 – point 3 a (new) – point c
(c ) Odstavek 3 se črta.
( c ) Paragraph 3 is deleted.
Člen 1 – točka 3 a (novo) točka (d)
Article 1 – point 3 a (new) – point d
Člen 24 – odstavek 4 – prvi stavek
Article 24 – paragraph 4 – sentence 1
(d) Prvi stavek odstavka 4 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(d) The first sentence of paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
„Države članice lahko od Komisije zahtevajo, da po postopku iz odstavka 1 dodaja vrste v prilogo IV.“
“ Member States may request the Commission to add species to Annex IV using the procedure referred to in paragraph 1. ”
(3b) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(3b) The following Article is inserted:
„Člen 24a
“Article 24a
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 24 se Komisiji podeli za obdobje petih let po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Article 24 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years following the entry into force of this Regulation.
Komisija najpozneje šest mesecev pred iztekom petletnega obdobja pripravi poročilo glede prenesenih pooblastil.
The Commission shall make a report in respect of the delegated powers at the latest 6 months before the end of the 5 - year period.
Prenos pooblastil se samodejno podaljša za enako dolgo obdobje, razen če ga Evropski parlament ali Svet prekličeta v skladu s členom 24b.
The delegation of powers shall be automatically extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council revokes it in accordance with Article 24b.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov se Komisiji dodeli pod pogoji iz členov 24b in 24c.“
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 24b and 24c.”
(3c) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(3c) The following Article is inserted:
„Člen 24b
“Article 24b
Prenos pooblastila iz člena 24 lahko kadar koli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet.
The delegation of powers referred to in Article 24 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Institucija, ki je začela notranji postopek o morebitnem preklicu prenesenih pooblastil, o tem obvesti drugo institucijo in Komisijo v razumnem času pred sprejetjem končnega sklepa, pri čemer navede prenesena pooblastila, ki bi lahko bila preklicana, ter morebitne razloge za preklic.
The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of powers shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated powers which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation.
Odločitev se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.“
It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.”
Člen 1 – točka (3 d) (novo)
Article 1 – point 3 d (new)
(3d) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(3d) The following Article is inserted:
„Člen 24c
“Article 24c
Če do izteka tega roka niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu, se ta objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati na tam navedeni datum.
If, on expiry of that period, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the date stated therein.
Če Evropski parlament in Svet obvestita Komisijo, da ne nameravata ugovarjati zoper delegirani akt, se ta objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati že pred iztekom tega obdobja.
The delegated act shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force before the expiry of that period if the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission of their intention not to raise objections.
Institucija, ki nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu, navede razloge za svoje nasprotovanje.“
The institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.”
Ta uredba začne veljati na dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
V tem primeru nujnost ni dokazana.
There is no proven urgency in this case.
Spremembe uredbe, ki jih je predlagala Komisija, temeljijo na rezultatih projekta IMPASSE, skupnega ukrepa, ki se osredotoča na okoljske učinke tujih vrst v ribogojstvu.
The Commission’s proposed amendments to the regulation are based on the outcome of the IMPASSE project, a concerted action focusing on environmental impacts of alien species in aquaculture.
Pri tem projektu je nastala operativna opredelitev zaprtega ribogojskega objekta, ki je poostrila in poglobila trenutno uporabljeno opredelitev in obsega pristop, po katerem bi bilo mogoče bistveno (po možnosti na sprejemljivo raven) zmanjšati stopnjo tveganja, povezano s tujimi vrstami, če bi se upoštevale možnosti za pobeg ciljnih in neciljnih organizmov med prevozom in s primerno opredeljenimi protokoli v sprejemnem objektu.
This project has produced an operational definition of a closed aquaculture facility – tightening up and enlarging upon the definition currently in use – embodying an approach whereby ‘the degree of risk associated with alien species could be reduced considerably, possibly to an acceptable level, if the potential for escape of target and non-target organisms is addressed during transportation and by well-defined protocols at the receiving facility’.
Glede na zgornje rezultate Komisija predlaga, da se vnosi in prenosi, ki vključujejo uporabo zaprtih ribogojskih objektov, izvzamejo iz zahtev za pridobitev dovoljenja in tako upravljavcem ne bo treba opravljati te formalnosti.
In the light of the above results the Commission is proposing that introductions and translocations involving the use of closed aquaculture facilities be exempted from the permit requirement, thus dispensing operators from that administrative formality.
Vnos tujih vrst je med glavnimi razlogi za večjo zmedo v ekosistemih in skupaj z uničenjem naravnih habitatov med dejavniki, ki najbolj prispevajo k izgubljanju svetovne biotske raznovrstnosti.
The introduction of alien species is one of the main reasons why ecosystems are being thrown out of kilter and, along with the destruction of natural habitats, one of the biggest contributory factors implicated in global biodiversity loss.
Kot ugotavlja Komisija, so za vnos tujih vrst v evropska obalna morja in celinske vode pogosto krive ribogojske prakse in prakse dopolnjevanja staležev.
As the Commission notes, the introduction of alien species into Europe’s coastal seas and inland waters is due in a great many cases to ‘aquaculture and stocking practices’.
Sprostitev postopka vnosa tujih vrst v ribogojstvu mora iti z roko v roki z natančno opredelitvijo zahtev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati zaprti ribogojski objekti (upoštevaje rezultate projekta IMPASSE), in potrebnim nadzorom objektov, da se zagotovi ustrezno upoštevanje in spoštovanje tehničnih zahtev, ki so jih predlagali strokovnjaki.
The relaxation in the introduction procedure for alien species in aquaculture must go hand in hand with an exact definition of the requirements with which closed aquaculture facilities will have to comply (in keeping with the outcome of the IMPASSE project) and with the necessary supervision of the facilities, the aim being to ensure that the technical requirements proposed by specialists will all be properly taken into account and observed.
Bistveni povratni ukrep je tudi previdnost pri prevozu ciljnih in neciljnih vrst v ribogojske objekte in iz njih.
Another essential quid pro quo is the care to be taken when target and non-target species are being transported to or from aquaculture facilities.
Trajnostni razvoj evropskega ribogojstva terja močno podporo znanstvenim raziskavam in tehnološkemu razvoju za namene gojenja avtohtonih vrst, da bi se omogočila večja raznovrstnost proizvodnje in dobave živil ter izboljšala njihova kakovost, hkrati pa povečala okoljska varnost.
The sustainable development of European aquaculture demands substantial support for scientific research and technological development for the purpose of farming native species, so as to enable production and the supply of foodstuffs to be diversified and their quality improved while also making for greater environmental security.
Da bi to dosegli, je treba predlagano zakonodajno pobudo močno podpreti.
The proposed legislative initiative accordingly needs to be backed up by strong encouragement, to bring this about.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 708/2007 z dne 11. junija 2007 vsebuje različne določbe o komitologiji, ki niso združljive s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije.
Council Regulation (EC) No 708/2007, of 11 June 2007 contains various ‘comitology’ provisions that are now incompatible with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Zato je poročevalec vložil vrsto predlogov sprememb, s katerimi bi se osnovni akt lahko uskladil z novo pogodbo, zlasti njenim členom 290.
The rapporteur is therefore tabling a set of amendments to bring the basic act into line with the new Treaty, and in particular Article 290 thereof.
Poročevalec predlaga tudi spremembo pravne podlage glede na predlog Komisije v skladu z mnenjem, ki ga je Odbor za pravne zadeve podal v skladu s členom 37 Poslovnika Parlamenta.
The rapporteur is, in addition, tabling an amendment concerning the Commission’s proposed legal basis in line with the opinion delivered by the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 37 of the Rules of Procedure.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi za uporabo tujih in lokalno neprisotnih vrst v ribogojstvu (sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 708/2007) ( KOM(2009)0541 – C7–0272/2009 – 2009/0153(COD) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the use of alien and locally absent species in aquaculture (amendment of Regulation (RC) No 708/2007) ( COM(2009)0541 – C7‑0272/2009 – 2009/0153(COD) )
V pismu z dne 18. marca 2010 ste Odbor za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 37(2) poslovnika zaprosili za mnenje o pravilnosti in primernosti pravne podlage navedenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 18 March 2010 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant or Article 37 of the Rules of Procedure to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Na seji 28. aprila 2010 je odbor preučil:
At its meeting of 28 April 2010, the committee considered:
· ali je člen 43(2) edina ustrezna pravna podlaga
· whether Article 43(2) constitutes the sole appropriate legal basis;