natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
8 KOM(2010)0073 z dne 3. marca 2010. samo obrobno spreminja postopek za uporabo sredstev ESPG s tem, da v skladu s prakso vrača postopek fakultativnega trialoga; ker ta sprememba ne rešuje zapletenosti in počasnosti postopka,
8 COM(2010)0073 of 3 March 2010. alters the procedure for mobilising the EGF only slightly, by making the trilogue procedure optional, in line with standard practice; whereas this change is unlikely to make the procedure any less slow and cumbersome,
J. ker je, v skladu z vmesnim poročilom o delovanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma Komisije
J. whereas, according to the Commission's interim report on the functioning of the IIA
KOM(2010)0185 z dne 27. aprila 2010. , eden izmed dejavnikov, ki upočasnjujejo postopek, potreba po specifični odločitvi obeh vej proračunskega organa za uporabo sredstev ESPG; ker to ne bi smelo preprečiti pospeševanja in poenostavitve sprejemanja sklepov glede uporabe sredstev ESPG,
COM(2010)0185 of 27 April 2010. , the need for the two arms of the budgetary authority to take a specific decision to mobilise the EGF is one of the factors behind the slowness of the procedure; whereas this should not prevent speeding up and simplification of decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF,
K. ker zanesljivi in skladni podatki o izvajanju ESPG, vse od spremembe po letu 2009, še niso na voljo, in ob strogem upoštevanju dejstva, da je treba določiti obveznosti na področju preglednosti in rednega poročanja,
K. whereas reliable and consistent data on the implementation of the EGF since its modification after 2009 is not yet available and taking the strong view that transparency and regular reporting duties need to be established,
L. ker je bilo vseh 27 odločb, ki so bile sprejete med letom 2007 in aprilom 2010, v svojem znesku pozitivnih in skladnih s predlogi Komisije,
L. whereas the 27 decisions taken between 2007 and April 2010 were all favourable and the amounts authorised were the same as those proposed by the Commission,
M. ker bodo pojav globalizacije in učinki gospodarske krize na zaposlovanje obstajali tudi po letu 2013, in ker je posledično mogoče, da se tendenca povečanja števila vlog v naslednjih letih lahko še okrepi, in ker sklad ne želi biti nadomestek za pomanjkanje inovacij,
M. whereas the globalisation phenomenon and the effects of the economic crisis on employment will persist beyond 2013 and, as a consequence, it is probable that the tendency for the number of applications to rise will increase in the next years; whereas, however, the intention of the fund is not to be a substitute for lack of innovation,
(a) stopnja uspeha ponovnega vključevanja in ocena strokovnega izpopolnjevanja upravičencev;
(a) the rate of success in reintegration and assessment of the upgrading of the skills of the beneficiaries;
(b) komparativna analiza financiranih ukrepov kot odziv na vsako vlogo za uporabo sredstev iz ESPG in rezultati na osnovi ponovnega vključevanja;
(b) a comparative analysis of the measures financed in response to each EGF application and results on the basis of reintegration;
(c) spoštovanje merila nediskriminacije glede na pogodbene razmere odpuščenih delavcev in delavcev, ki uveljavljajo svojo pravico do prostega gibanja znotraj EU;
(c) compliance with the non-discrimination criterion with reference to the contractual position of the workers made redundant and to workers who make use of their right to free movement within the EU;
(d) postopki posvetovanja s socialnimi partnerji, ki so bili, oziroma niso bili uporabljeni pri pripravi vlog, in pregledi glede njihovega izvajanja;
(d) the procedures for consulting the social partners that were or were not used when preparing applications and the checks carried out on their implementation;
(e) vpliv ESPG na mrežo njegovih upravičencev in na mala in srednja podjetja, ki bi jih lahko prizadel načrt odpuščanja presežnih delavcev, in delavci katerih bi lahko koristili sklad;
(e) the impact of the EGF on its beneficiaries' network and on the small and medium-sized enterprises potentially affected by the redundancy plan and whose employees could profit from the fund;
(f) analiza posledic različnih kandidatur za ESPG pri nacionalnih institucijah, ki so pristojne za njihovo upravljanje;
(f) an analysis of the implications of the different EGF candidatures in terms of the national institution in charge of their management;
(g) vpliv prispevkov iz ESPG po starostni skupini v upravičenih državah članicah in sektorjih;
(g) the impact of contributions from the EGF by age group in benefiting Member States and sectors;
(a) z razlogi za večje razlike med sredstvi, ki so bila zahtevana iz ESPG, in zneski, ki so jih vrnile države članice upravičenke, ko se je pomoč že zaključila;
(a) the reasons for the large disparity between the resources requested from the EGF and the amounts reimbursed by the beneficiary Member States when the assistance is already concluded;
(b) s primeri, kjer so države članice že izvedle vračilo, kjer financirani programi in ukrepi niso bili izvedeni;
(b) in the cases where Member States have made reimbursements, which were the financed programmes and measures not executed;
(c) z razlogi za velike razlike med državami članicami glede financiranja na delavca v različnih vlogah za ESPG;
(c) the reasons for the large disparities between Member States in terms of the funding provided per worker in the different EGF applications;
(d) z analizo usklajevanja med različnimi programi, ki jih financira Evropa (vključno s pomočjo ESS), ki so bili dodeljeni isti regiji, kjer se vloge za ESPG obravnavajo in/ali so bile že obravnavane;
(d) an analysis of coordination between the various European-financed programmes (including ESF assistance) which have been allocated to the same region where EGF applications are being considered and/or their consideration has been concluded;
(e) z analizo razmerja celotnega financiranja, ki ga je Komisija namenila v odnosu do drugih nacionalnih ali podjetjem lastnih podpornih ukrepov;
(e) an analysis of the proportion of overall funding that the Commission accounted for in relation to other national and company-specific support measures;
(a) države članice pripravijo vlogo za uporabo sredstev iz ESPG že ob napovedi namena kolektivnega odpuščanja in ne šele po njegovi uresničitvi;
(a) applications for mobilisation of the EGF should be drawn up by Member States as soon as a collective redundancy has been announced, and not after it has taken place,
(b) Komisija obvesti države članice, da mora biti vloga predložena od prvega dne dalje, ko so merila za pomoč izpolnjena;
(b) the Commission should inform Member States that an application could be presented from the first day when the intervention criteria have been fulfilled;
(c) vsa sredstva bi morala biti na voljo za zagotovitev hitre in okrepljene komunikacije z državami članicami, ki sodelujejo v tem procesu;
(c) all means should be made available to ensure swift and enhanced communication with the Member State concerned in this process;
(d) vloge držav članic v svojem jeziku in v enem izmed delovnih jezikov evropskih institucij bi lahko službi Komisije, ki je zadolžena za pregled vlog, omogočila takojšen začetek dela;
(d) applications by Member States in their own language and one of the European institutions' working languages could help the Commission department responsible for scrutinising applications to do so without delay;
(e) Komisija bi morala imeti potrebne človeške vire in tehnične zmožnost, ob spoštovanju načel proračunske nevtralnosti, za učinkovito in hitro obravnavo vlog, ki so jih predložile države članice;
(e) the Commission should have the necessary human and technical capacities, respecting the principles of budgetary neutrality, to effectively and swiftly process the applications submitted by Member States;
(f) Komisija bi morala odločiti o uporabi sredstev iz ESPG v obdobju treh, štirih mesecev po prejetju vloge, vključno z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, iz države članice; v primerih, kjer presoja vloge lahko traja več kot štiri mesece, pa bi morala Komisija čim prej obvestiti Evropski parlament in navesti razloge za takšno zamudo;
(f) the Commission should take decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF within 3-4 months after having received the application, including all necessary information, from the Member State; in cases where the assessment of an application might take longer than 4 months, the Commission should inform the EP as soon as possible and state the reasons for such a delay;
10. zahteva, da države članice ob posvetovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti s socialnimi partnerji, vzpostavijo komunikacijsko in upravno strukturo za ESPG na nacionalni ravni in izmenjajo najboljše prakse na evropski ravni, kar bo ESPG omogočilo hitro in učinkovito ukrepanje v primerih množičnega odpuščanja;
Requests the Member States to put in place a communication and administration structure for the EGF at national level, in consultation with all stakeholders, particularly the social partners, and to exchange good practice at European level, which will allow the EGF to take rapid and effective action in cases of large-scale redundancies;
(a) mora Komisija upoštevati časovni razpored Evropskega parlamenta, tako glede sej parlamentarnega odbora kot glede delnih zasedanj, in pravočasno predložiti svoje predloge, da se tako pospeši postopek odločanja;
(a) the Commission must take due account of the EP calendar, with regard to the parliamentary committee meetings as well as the part-sessions, submitting its proposals in due time, in order to speed up the decision-making procedure;
(b) mora Komisija pravočasno obvestiti Evropski parlament o težavah in/ali ovirah, na katere je naletela pri presoji vlog držav članic;
(b) the Commission must inform the EP in due time on difficulties and/or blockages encountered while assessing the Member States' applications;
(c) bosta na drugi strani Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbor za proračun naredila vse, kar je v njuni moči, da zagotovita sprejemanje sklepov na plenarnem zasedanju, ki bo sledilo sprejetju v odboru;
(c) on the other hand, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Budgets will do everything they can to ensure that decisions are taken at the next plenary session following adoption in committee;
16. poudarja, da bo prihodnost ESPG določena v okviru pogajanj o naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru; meni, da je treba zato preučiti več možnosti; meni, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti preučitvi možnosti oblikovanja neodvisnega sklada z lastnimi sredstvi za obveznosti in plačila, in poziva Komisijo, da predstavi predloge za financiranje takšnega sklada; verjame, da bo vsaka prihodnja reforma ESPG ohranila njegovo prilagodljivost, ki trenutno predstavlja primerljivo prednost v odnosu do strukturnih skladov EU;
Stresses that the future of the EGF will be determined in the framework of negotiations on the next MFF; considers that for this purpose several options could be examined; considers that particular attention should be given to examining the option of establishing an independent fund with its own commitment and payment appropriations and calls on the Commission to come forward with proposals for resourcing such a fund; believes that any future reform of the EGF should maintain its flexibility, which currently represents a comparative advantage in relation to the EU Structural Funds;
20. poziva Komisijo, da izboljša svoje poročanje o uporabi ESPG s tem, da znatno obogati svoja letna sporočila in redno posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu informacije o tem, na kakšen način države članice izvajajo finančne prispevke;
Calls on the Commission to improve its reporting on the use of the EGF by substantially fleshing out its annual reports and regularly forwarding to Parliament information on Member States' implementation of financial contributions;
To samoiniciativno poročilo je bilo pripravljeno skoraj tri leta po izvajanju ESPG, na podlagi uredbe z dne 20. decembra 2006, ki je bila znatno spremenjena z uredbo z dne 18. junija 2009
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. , as substantially amended by the regulation of 18 June 2009
Uredba (ES) št. 1927/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji. .
Regulation (EC) No 546/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. .
Glede na izkušnje, ki so bile pridobljene v tem obdobju in na podlagi mnenja nacionalnih strokovnjakov, ki so bili zaslišani 28. aprila 2010, se oblikuje ocena financiranja in delovanja sklada pred in po pregledu njegove pravne podlage.
Drawing on the experience gained over that period and on the opinions of national experts heard on 28 April 2010, it reviews the funding and functioning of the fund before and after the revision of its legal basis.
Ob upoštevanju strukturnega porasta brezposelnosti in večanja primerov kolektivnega odpuščanja v Evropski uniji priporoča, da se sklad spremeni v stalni instrument za solidarnost z delavci, ki so bili žrtve kolektivnega odpuščanja, in to od prihodnjega večletnega finančnega okvira dalje.
In view of the structural increase in unemployment and the rise in the number of collective redundancies in the European Union, it recommends that, from the start of the next multiannual financial framework, the fund be made a permanent means of providing support for workers affected by collective redundancies.
Kratkoročno se predlagajo spremembe manjšega obsega, s katerimi bi se odplavilo najbolj očitne pomanjkljivosti.
It also proposes that, in the more immediate future, less far-reaching changes be made with a view to remedying its most obvious faults.
Zato se od Komisije zahteva, da preloži datum te ocene na 31. julij 2011.
To that end, the Commission is asked to bring the date of that evaluation forward to 31 July 2011.
Pristop, ki je povzet v nadaljevanju, temelji na podrobni analizi pravnih pogojev za uporabo sredstev ESPG (I) in dejanski uporabi sredstev med letom 2007 in aprilom 2010 (II).
The approach outlined above is based on a detailed analysis of the legislation governing mobilisation of the EGF 1 and of its actual mobilisation between 2007 and April 2010 2 .
· Materialni pogoji
· Basic conditions
ESPG je imel na začetku za cilj samo omilitev negativnih posledic globalizacije za najbolj ranljive in najmanj kvalificirane delavce nekaterih sektorjev, ki so izgubili svojo zaposlitev zaradi večjih sprememb svetovne trgovine, ki so vodile v težko ekonomsko motnjo.
The EGF was initially intended solely as a means of countering the adverse impact of globalisation on the most vulnerable and least qualified workers in certain sectors who lose their jobs as a result of major changes in world trade patterns that cause severe economic disruption.
Od junija 2009 je bilo njegovo področje delovanja razširjeno na delavce, ki so izgubili svojo zaposlitev neposredno zaradi gospodarske in finančne krize, in tudi za vloge, ki so bile vložene med 1. majem 2009 in 31. decembrom 2011.
In June 2009 its scope was extended to include workers who lose their jobs as a direct result of the economic and financial crisis, in respect of whom applications may be made for support between 1 May 2009 and 31 December 2011.
Ali je treba spremeniti cilj ESPG ob upoštevanju strukturnega porasta brezposelnosti in večanja primerov kolektivnega odpuščanja v Evropski uniji?
Should the purpose of the EGF be rethought in view of the structural rise in unemployment and the increase in the number of collective redundancies in the European Union?
Ali je odstopanje, ki je bilo uvedeno junija 2009, zadostno za soočanje s krizo?
Is the derogation included in June 2009 an adequate response to the crisis?
Države članice lahko zaprosijo za prispevek iz ESPG, če je izpolnjeno eno od naslednjih treh meril za pomoč :
Member States may apply for a contribution under the EGF in cases where one of the following three intervention criteria is met :
– vsaj 500 presežnih delavcev (1.000 pred letom 2009) v obdobju 4 mesecev v podjetju v državi članici, vključno z delavci, ki postanejo presežni pri dobaviteljih ali proizvajalcih na nižji stopnji (člen 2a))
– at least 500 (1000 prior to 2009) redundancies over a period of four months in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers or downstream producers (Article 2(a))
Členi, na katere se sklicuje, so členi Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006. ;
The articles quoted appear in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. ;
– vsaj 500 presežnih delavcev v obdobju 9 mesecev (1.000 pred letom 2009), zlasti v malih in srednje velikih podjetjih, v sektorju NACE 2 v eni regiji ali dveh sosednjih regijah po ravni NUTS II (člen 2b));
– at least 500 (1000 prior to 2009) redundancies, over a period of nine months, particularly in small or medium-sized enterprises, in a NACE 2 sector in one region or two contiguous regions at NUTS II level (Article 2(b));
– na majhnih trgih dela ali v izrednih okoliščinah, kadar odpuščanje delavcev resno vpliva na zaposlenost in lokalno gospodarstvo, tudi če prejšnji pogoji niso v celoti izpolnjeni (člen 2c)).
– redundancies with a serious impact on employment and the local economy, even if neither of the above criteria are met, in small labour markets or in exceptional circumstances that are duly substantiated (Article 2(c)).
Ali je zmanjšanje ravni s 1.000 na 500 delavcev zadostno?
Is it enough to lower the threshold from 1000 to 500 workers?
Ali so roki in geografska območja vknjižbe teh odpuščanj primerni?
Are the time periods and geographical parameters used in determining eligibility appropriate?
ESPG prispeva k financiranju aktivnih ukrepov na trgu dela, ki so lahko del usklajenega svežnja prilagojenih storitev, namenjenih ponovni vključitvi presežnih delavcev, ki so izgubili zaposlitev, na trg dela.
The EGF helps to fund active labour market measures that form part of a coordinated package of personalised services designed to re-integrate redundant workers into the labour market.
Ti aktivni ukrepi so, na primer, pomoč pri iskanju zaposlitve, usposabljanje, dodatki za spodbujanje mobilnosti oziroma ukrepi, s katerimi se spodbuja zlasti prikrajšane ali starejše delavce, da ostanejo ali se vrnejo na trg dela.
These active measures include assistance in seeking employment, training, travel allowances and incentives for disadvantaged or elderly workers to remain on or return to the labour market.
Nasprotno pa se ukrepi pasivnega socialnega varstva ne financirajo iz ESPG.
Passive social protection measures are not funded under the EGF.
Na kakšen način se lahko ohrani inovativni pristop ESPG, ki temelji na vrednotenju sposobnosti in želja vsakega delavca, ki se mu je pomagalo, ob podpiranju širjenja pristopa na druge instrumente?
How is the EGF's innovative approach, which focuses on the abilities and wishes of each worker in receipt of support, to be maintained and carried over to other measures?
Prispevek ESPG dopolnjuje ukrepe, ki jih izvajajo države članice, in jih ne nadomešča.
EGF support is intended to complement, rather than take the place of, action by Member States.
Ta zahteva po dopolnjevanju narekuje določitev najvišje stopnje sofinanciranja, ki lahko znaša 50 % stroškov za predvidene ukrepe, ta stopnja pa je bila v letu 2009 povečana na 65 % za vloge, predložene pred 31. decembrom 2011.
In view of this complementarity requirement, co-financing covers no more than 50% of the cost of the proposed measures; in 2009 that rate was raised to 65% for applications submitted before 31 December 2011.
Ali je začasno povečanje stopnje sofinanciranja ESPG zadostno?
Is this temporary increase in the EGF co-financing rate sufficient?
Delovanje ESPG mora biti usklajeno z ukrepi drugih politik Evropske unije.
Action under the EGF must be coordinated with action under other EU policies.
Ta potreba po usklajevanju pomeni prepoved vsakega sofinanciranja stroškov ukrepov, ki jih predvidevajo drugi finančni instrumenti Evropske unije.
In view of this coordination requirement, no measures receiving a contribution under the EGF may receive assistance under other EU financial instruments.
Glede tega je pomembno, da države članice še zlasti pazijo, da ukrepi, ki jih podpira ESPG, ne koristijo že financiranja iz ESS, vedoč, da ima ena izmed smernic ESS namen, " izboljšati prilagodljivost delavcev in podjetij ter prožnost trgov dela .
In this connection, Member States must ensure, in particular, that measures supported under the EGF are not also in receipt of funding under the ESF, given that one of the guidelines applying to the ESF provides for improving the 'adaptability of workers and enterprises and the flexibility of the labour markets'
Sklep Sveta št. 2006/702/ES z dne 6. oktobra 2006 o strateških smernicah Skupnosti o koheziji. "
Council Decision 2006/702/EC of 6 October 2006 on Community strategic guidelines on cohesion. .
Ali je zahteva po usklajevanju v celoti upoštevana?
Is the coordination requirement fully met?
· Postopkovni pogoji
· Procedural conditions
ESPG je dodeljen najvišji letni znesek 500 milijonov EUR, ki se črpa iz katere koli razpoložljive razlike do skupne zgornje meje odhodkov iz prejšnjega leta oziroma iz zapadlih odobritev za prevzem obveznosti iz prejšnjih dveh let, razen tistih, povezanih z razdelkom 1b finančnega okvira.
The EGF has a maximum annual amount of EUR 500 million, drawn either from any margin existing under the global expenditure ceiling of the previous year or from cancelled commitment appropriations from the previous two years, excluding those relating to heading 1b of the financial framework.
Proračunska sredstva so vključena v splošni proračun Evropske unije kot rezervacija (vrstica 40 02 43) z običajnim proračunskim postopkom, takoj ko Komisija opredeli zadostna sredstva v okviru razlik do zgornje meje in/ali zapadle obveznosti.
Commitment appropriations are entered in the general budget of the European Union as a provision (line 40 02 43) under the normal budgetary procedure as soon as the Commission has identified sufficient margins and/or cancelled commitments.
Ustrezne odobritve plačil se lahko vpišejo v rezervo, pridejo iz proračunskih postavk, ki so predmet premajhne porabe, ali se vpišejo na vrstico ESPG (04 05 01).
The corresponding payment appropriations may be entered in the reserve, drawn from under-utilised budget lines or entered against the EGF budget line (04 05 01).
Ali mora ESPG ostati sklad brez sredstev?
Should the EGF remain an unfunded fund?
Postopek uporabe sredstev ESPG je sestavljen iz štirih faz :
There are four stages in the EGF mobilisation procedure :
– država članica vlogo za prispevek iz ESPG predloži Komisiji v roku 10 tednov od datuma, ko so izpolnjeni pogoji za pridobivanje pomoči ESPG, to vlogo država članica lahko dopolni naknadno;
– a Member State submits an application for an EGF contribution to the Commission within a period of 10 weeks from the date on which the EGF intervention conditions are met; the application may be supplemented subsequently by the Member State;
– Komisija presodi vlogo ob posvetovanju z državo članico; temu sledi začetek proračunskega postopka s predlogom sklepa za uporabo sredstev ESPG, s katerim se določi znesek finančnega prispevka, ki se dodeli, in tudi zahteva pa prerazporeditev zneska tega prispevka;
– the application is scrutinised by the Commission, in consultation with the Member State, following which, if necessary, the budgetary procedure is initiated by means of a proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, stipulating the size of the financial contribution to be made, and a request for the transfer of the relevant amount is drawn up;
– obe veji proračunskega organa preučita predlog sklepa za uporabo sredstev ESPG in zahtevo za prenos, čemur sledi sprejetje z ali brez predlogov sprememb;
– the proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF and the request for transfer is considered by the two arms of the budgetary authority; where appropriate, they are adopted with or without amendments;