natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na evropski ravni se še nismo poenotili glede tega, katere ozemeljske značilnosti privedejo do slabših pogojev, ki so lokalno, regionalno in socialno pogojeni, in zlasti do družbene segregacije.
The territorial characteristics which bring about local, regional and social disadvantages - especially segregation - have not been introduced uniformly on European level yet.
Socialno in geografsko obrobna območja znotraj regij
Intra-regional social and geographical peripheries
Za obvladovanje težav na območni ravni je nujen celovit pristop
Integrated approach is needed to tackle the problem on territorial level
Če izhajamo iz zgoraj predstavljene analize, vidimo, da za reševanje težav ranljivih skupin horizontalni pristop ni dovolj.
Based on the analysis above, the horizontal approaches are not sufficient to solve the problems of vulnerable groups.
Pri obravnavi položaja teh ranljivih skupin je nujen območni pristop, s katerim bi se lahko lokalno odzvali na kompleksne težave posameznih območij.
In order to tackle the situation of these vulnerable groups a territorial approach is needed, which would address to the complexity of the problems locally, in the concerned areas.
Dejansko potrebujemo mikroregionalen pristop, ki se bo osredotočil na razlike znotraj regij in na najobčutljivejša območja.
There is a genuine need for a micro-regional based approach focusing on intra-regional disparities and on the most sensitive areas.
V nasprotnem primeru se lahko proces polarizacije še okrepi, zlasti če bodo gospodarski in socialni ukrepi osredotočeni na dinamična središča, položaj izključenih območij pa se lahko še poslabša.
If not, the polarization processes can deepen - especially if the economic and social interventions will be concentrated around the dynamic centres - and the excluded areas will further decline.
Pri obvladovanju teh težav bi bilo treba večjo pozornost nameniti prostorskemu načrtovanju in celostnemu prostorskemu razvoju.
When tackling this problem, greater emphasis should be laid on spatial planning and the integrated spatial development.
Ozemeljska izključenost znotraj regij
Intra-regional territorial exclusion
Neenake možnosti, koncentracija socialnih konfliktov, zlasti zaradi družbene segregacije in z njo povezane koncentracije ranljivih skupin, se lahko pojavijo v različnih okoliščinah.
The lack of equal opportunities, the concentration of social conflicts, with special regard to segregation resulting in the concentration of the vulnerable groups, can occur in several situations.
Gre za dobro znano težavo mest, ki pa je glede na izkušnje novih držav članic pojavlja zlasti območno pogojena.
It is a well-known urban problem, but on the basis of the experience gained by new member states it appears mostly on a territorial basis.
Na najbolj nerazvitih območjih obstaja nevarnost ozemeljske izključenosti
The most underdeveloped areas are at a risk of territorial exclusion
Ranljive skupine od večinske družbe ne ločuje le razdalja v prostoru, pač pa tudi socialne razlike.
There is both spatial and social distance between the vulnerable group and the majority of the society.
Vzroki za izključenost izvirajo zlasti iz geografskega položaja izključene skupine.
The causes of exclusion root mostly the location of the excluded group.
Geografski položaj lahko bistveno vpliva na neugoden položaj z naslednjimi dejavniki:
Location can mean serious disadvantages according to the following factors:
Dejavniki, vezani na geografski položaj :
· Location features :
o dostopnost delovnih mest,
o Accessibility of workplaces
o oddaljenost od mestnih središč,
o Distance of city centres
o slaba ali sorazmerno draga prometna infrastruktura,
o The poor transport infrastructure or its relative high expenditure
o nizek dohodek,
o Low income
Dejavniki, vezani na notranje značilnosti območja:
· Internal features of the area
o dejstvo, da ni uspešnih podjetij, ki bi delovala na določenem prostoru,
o Lack of presence of successfully operating entrepreneurships
o nizka stopnja zaposlenosti,
o Low employment rate
o nizka stopnja izobrazbe,
o Low rate of qualification
o človeški viri (v smislu zdravja, izobrazbe, blaginje)
o Human resources (in terms of health, qualification, well-being)
o stanje grajenega okolja,
o The state of the built environment
o napetosti med različnimi socialnimi skupinami, rasizem in družbena segregacija,
o Tensions between the different social groups, racism and segregation
o pomanjkanje javnih storitev ali njihova slaba kakovost.
o Lack or low quality of public services
Ozemeljska izključenost na splošno ni običajna težava nerazvitih območij in se ne pojavlja le na podeželskih območjih, ampak je zlasti značilna za obrobna območja in mikroregije, ki so v globoki krizi.
Territorial exclusion is not generally the typical problem of the underdeveloped areas, and not only the rural areas, but it is specially the feature of the peripheries, micro-regions being in deep crisis.
Običajno se javlja v naslednjih oblikah, ki so pogosto splet številnih ozemeljskih značilnostih hkrati:
Territorial exclusion has the following generic types, often resulting in a whole range of different territorial features present at the same time:
– periferna lokacija,
- Peripheral location;
– koncentracija izključenih socialnih skupin (t.i. socialna periferija),
- Concentration of excluded social groups - "social periphery";
– koncentracija socialnih konfliktov zaradi gospodarske in strukturne preobrazbe.
- Concentration of social conflicts as a result of economic and structural transformation.
Večje ozemeljske enote zakrivajo težave izključenih ozemelj
Larger territorial units hide the problems of excluded territories
Eden od vzrokov za odsotnost prepoznavnosti nerazvitih in zaostajajočih območij je ozemeljsko združevanje.
One of the problems of the lack of visibility of underdeveloped and lagging behind areas lies in the territorial aggregation.
Če statistika prikazuje podatke za večje ozemeljske enote, razlike znotraj ozemeljskih enot niso več vidne.
If the statistics show the data of bigger territorial units, the differences within the territorial units disappear.
Z osnovno mersko enoto kohezijske politike EU – NUTS 2 – se primerjajo socialni in gospodarski dejavniki teh ozemeljskih enot v različnih državah.
The available basis unit of measurement of the EU cohesion policy (NUTS 2) makes the social and economic factors of these territorial units of the different countries comparable.
Ta pristop je treba še naprej uporabljati za razdeljevanje sredstev iz kohezijske politike med regije in države .
For the division of the resources of cohesion policy between regions and countries it is this approach that should be further applied.
Vendar z vidika razlage ozemeljske kohezije poteka več prostorskih procesov, ki jih socialno-ekonomski kazalniki, opredeljeni na ravni NUTS 2, ne dokazujejo, zato ostajajo zakriti.
However, from the point of view of the interpretation of territorial cohesion, there are several spatial processes under way which do not appear through the socio-economic indicators identified on NUTS 2 level, and therefore remain hidden.
Ozemeljska koncentracija ranljivih skupin na obrobnih območjih regij
The territorial concentration of vulnerable groups on the regions’ peripheries
Poleg potreb mest in njihovih širših okoliških podeželskih območij je glavni razlog za resne razvojne vrzeli znotraj regij, zlasti na vzhodu Srednje Evrope, pomanjkanje infrastrukture.
Beside the needs of the cities and their wider surrounding rural areas, it is the lack of infrastructure which is the main reason for the serious development gaps within the regions, especially in Eastern Central Europe.
Ker so trgi dela organizirani lokalno in ker primanjkuje prometnih ali informacijskih povezav, prebivalci na podeželju zaradi manjše mobilnosti nimajo dostopa do ugodnosti, ki jih ponujajo razvitejša mesta.
Due to the local territorial organisation of the labour market, the lack of transport or information connections; the rural inhabitants with their lower mobility can not access the advantages offered by more developed cities.
Zato ima privlačnost mest negativni vpliv, zaradi revščine in neustrezne dostopnosti infrastrukture pa je vse manj zaznaven potencial podeželskih območij.
Consequently, the attraction impact of the cities is not crowned with success, and due to the poverty and the insufficient availability of infrastructure the potential of rural areas is less and less recognized.
V novih državah članicah, kjer so pritiski zaradi priseljevanja v mesta manjši, se socialno ločevanje in odsotnost enakih možnosti pojavlja zlasti na teh podeželskih območjih.
In the new member states, where the tensions coming from the immigration concentrated in cities are less present, social segregation and the equal opportunities shortcomings appear mostly in these rural areas.
Gre za izziv, ki je vsaj podobno zahteven.
It is at least a challenge of similar scale.
Ozemeljska izključenost presega socialne težave
Territorial exclusion is beyond the social problems
Medtem ko revščino povzroča nezadosten prihodek, pa ozemeljsko pogojeno izključenost sproža več dejavnikov, ker ljudje, ki živijo v oddvojenih naseljih in območjih, posledično izgubijo tudi veliko drugih možnosti, denimo za izobraževanje ali glede dostopa do infrastrukture in storitev.
Moreover, while poverty is basically a result of insufficient income, territorial exclusion goes beyond this, since those living in segregated settlements and areas lose consequently a lot more opportunities: learning opportunities, access to infrastructure and services.
Etnične razlike – koncentracija priseljencev v mestnih getih in močnejša segregacija romskega prebivalstva v novih državah članicah – so vir še večjih težav za zaostajajoča območja, ker je njihovo vključevanje še bolj zapleteno.
The ethnic differences - concentration of immigrants in urban ghettos and enhanced segregation of the Roma population in the new member states - make the problems of lagging behind areas even more serious, since their integration is even more challenging.
Končno, verjetno je, da najbolj ranljive skupine ne bodo izključene le iz pozitivnega širjenja socialno-ekonomskega razvoja, ampak tudi iz procesov odločanja.
Finally, most vulnerable groups are likely while being excluded from the positive spill-over of socio-economic development to be as well excluded from decision-making processes.
Omejeno zbiranje in obdelava območnih podatkov v evropskih raziskavah
Limited territorial data collection and processing in the European research
Evropska statistika socialnih težav ne prikazuje ustrezno.
The social problems are not visible enough through the European statistics.
Da bomo razpolagali s primerljivimi ozemeljskimi enotami, moramo različne ozemeljske ravni in podatke iz različnih držav izbrati tako, da bodo razlike glede velikosti ozemeljskih enot čim manjše.
In order to get comparable territorial units, we need to select the different territorial levels and data from the different countries in such a way that the variation of size of territorial units will be as small as possible.
Poleg težav ozemeljskega združevanja so na voljo le omejeni socialni kazalniki v teritorialni členitvi, zato se evropske prostorske raziskave manj osredotočajo na socialne težave.
Beyond territorial aggregation problems, there are only limited social indicators at our disposal in territorial breakdown and therefore the European spatial research focus less on the social problems.
Na voljo je nekaj študij primerov, ki kažejo na pojav segregacije in ozemeljske izključenosti, bolj verodostojne vseevropske analize pa še nimamo.
There are some case studies which show the phenomena of segregation and territorial exclusion, but no Europe-wide analysis having higher level validity has been prepared yet.
Kazalniki, ki jih je mogoče uporabljati na območni ravni, so:
The indicators which can be applied territorially are as follows:
– stopnja aktivnosti,
- Activity rate
– stopnja zaposlenosti,
- Employment rate
– stopnja dolgotrajne brezposelnosti,
- Long-term unemployment rate
– stopnja visokošolske izobrazbe,
- Higher education rate
– indeks človeškega razvoja (HDI),
- Human development index (HDI)
– nevarnost zdrsa pod prag revščine,
- Risk of poverty
– pričakovana življenjska doba,
- Life expectancy
– delež oseb z največ osnovnošolsko izobrazbo.
- Proportion of those having maximum primary school qualification
Načini obvladovanja revščine in socialne izključenosti se med državami razlikujejo.
The way how poverty and social exclusion risks are tackled varies country by country.
Sistemi držav članic se ne razlikujejo le glede razpoložljivih sredstev, ampak tudi glede mehanizmov dodeljevanja.
The systems of the member states differ not only in their available resources but also in the mechanisms of allocation.
Razen nacionalnih razlik je treba za dejansko reševanje težav zaostajajočih in oddvojenih ozemelj priznati, da sta revščina in socialna izključenost ozemeljski vprašanji, ki ju je treba obravnavati z območnim pristopom in z dovolj sredstvi, ki bodo dejansko namenjena najbolj prikrajšanim območjem.
Besides national differences if we really want to solve the problems of lagging behind and segregated territories, we need to admit that the problems of poverty and social exclusion are territorial issues that need to be addressed through a spatial approach with sufficient resources concretely targeting the most disadvantaged areas.
Ti viri bi morali omogočiti, da se z ustreznim upoštevanjem izzivov in možnosti zaostajajočih in oddvojenih ozemelj odpre prosta pot njihovemu konkurenčnemu potencialu, da bodo ta območja lahko nadoknadila zaostanek in bomo ustvarili teritorialno in socialno bolj povezano Unijo.
These resources should help to unlock the potentials of competitiveness of lagging behind and segregated territories taking into account their challenges and opportunities and make them able to catch up in order to create a territorially and socially more cohesive EU.
o vplivu kohezijske politike na vključevanje ranljivih skupnosti in skupin
on the impact of cohesion policies on the integration of vulnerable communities and groups
Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja poziva Odbor za regionalni nadzor kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. poudarja, da sezonsko delo danes opravljajo predvsem delovni migranti, čeprav so sezonski delavci vedno veljali za najbolj ranljive skupine na podeželju; meni, da si je treba prizadevati za to, da bi bili ti delavci upravičeni do podobnih pogodb in delovnih pogojev, kot jih imajo delavci s stalnim prebivališčem;
Points out that, although seasonal workers have always been one of the most vulnerable groups in rural areas, seasonal work is these days largely in the hands of migrant workers; hence, considers that such workers should have the benefit of employment contracts and working conditions similar to those of resident workers;
5. poziva k nadaljnjemu opravljanju donosnih dejavnosti na podeželskih območjih, za kar je treba posebno pozornost nameniti družinskim ter malim in srednjim kmetijam, zlasti na podlagi revizije skupne kmetijske politike, da bi postala pravičnejša, pa tudi nekmetijskim podjetniškim dejavnostim, ki zagotavljajo blago in storitve, da bi prebivalci ostali na podeželju in se naselili novi;
Calls for income-generating activities to continue in rural areas, for which purpose particular attention should be devoted to family farming and to small and medium-sized farmers, with the CAP being revised in order to make it fairer, as well as to non-agricultural entrepreneurial activities which supply goods and services that are essential to maintaining the population and welcoming new arrivals;
9. meni, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti novim državam članicam, ker bi se lahko kljub temu, da so bili zanje v obdobju prehoda k tržnemu gospodarstvu značilni neto migracijski tokovi na podeželje, ta težnja v prihodnosti spremenila, s tem pa bi se povečale težave glede obubožanja, in sicer ne le na podeželju, temveč tudi v mestnih središčih;
Considers that particular attention should be devoted to the new Member States, since although those countries experienced net migration to the countryside during the period of transition to a market economy, that trend could go into reverse in the future, thus aggravating the problems of impoverishment not only in the countryside but also in urban areas;
Emmanouil Angelakas, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Victor Boştinaru, Wolfgang Bulfon, Bairbre de Brún, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Zita Gurmai, Gábor Harangozó, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Florencio Luque Aguilar, Sérgio Marques, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Wojciech Roszkowski, Elisabeth Schroedter, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Emmanouil Angelakas, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Victor Boştinaru, Wolfgang Bulfon, Bairbre de Brún, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Zita Gurmai, Gábor Harangozó, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Florencio Luque Aguilar, Sérgio Marques, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Wojciech Roszkowski, Elisabeth Schroedter, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o odprtju in upravljanju avtonomnih tarifnih kvot Skupnosti za uvoz nekaterih ribiških proizvodov na Kanarske otoke
on the proposal for a Council regulation opening and providing for the administration of autonomous Community tariff quotas on imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2008)0129 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2008)0129 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 299(2) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0153/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0153/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6‑0213/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0213/2008 ),
Od leta 1991 je Evropska unija popolnoma ali delno ukinila dajatve skupne carinske tarife pri uvozu nekaterih ribiških proizvodov na Kanarske otoke.
Since 1991 the European Union has suspended, partially or in full, the Common Customs Tariff duties on imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands.
Izjemen zemljepisni položaj Kanarskih otokov pomeni dodatne stroške za ta sektor pri oskrbi z nekaterimi ribiškimi proizvodi, ki so bistveni za domačo porabo.
The exceptional geographical situation of the Canary Islands in relation to the sources of supply of certain fishery products which are essential for domestic consumption entails additional costs for this sector.
To naravno oviro je mogoče odpraviti, med drugim z začasno opustitvijo carin pri uvozu zadevnih proizvodov iz tretjih držav znotraj tarifnih kvot Skupnosti ustreznega obsega.
This natural handicap can be remedied, inter alia, by temporarily suspending customs duties on imports of the products in question from third countries within Community tariff quotas of an appropriate volume.
Predlog za odprtje in upravljanje brezcarinskih tarifnih kvot je skladen s členom 299(2) Pogodbe o ES, ki določa posebne ukrepe za pomoč najbolj oddaljenim regijam.
The proposal for the opening and provision of duty-free tariff quotas is in line with Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty providing for specific measures to assist the outermost regions.
Omeniti je treba, da obstoječe določbe na področju, na katero se nanaša predlog (Uredba (ES) št. 704/2002), od 31. decembra 2006 ne veljajo več.
It is important to mention that the existing provisions in the area of the proposal, Regulation (EC) No 704/2002, expired on 31 December 2006.
Zato od 1. januarja 2007 obstaja pravna vrzel, zaradi katere se plačila jamstev na španski meji kopičijo in dosegajo zneske, ki kličejo po takojšnji rešitvi.
In consequence, a juridical gap has existed since 1st January 2007, during which the payments of guarantees at the Spanish customs have been accumulating, reaching amounts that need to be settled as soon as possible.
Po posvetovanjih z zainteresiranimi stranmi in uradni prošnji španskih organov oblasti se je torej treba dogovoriti o odprtju dveh brezcarinskih tarifnih kvot pri uvozu nekaterih ribiških proizvodov na Kanarske otoke v obdobju 2007–2013.
Consequently, following the consultations with the stakeholders and the formal request introduced by the Spanish authorities, it should be agreed to open two duty-free tariff quotas on imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands for the period 2007-2013.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o predložitvi statističnih podatkov o nominalnem ulovu držav članic, ki ribarijo v severovzhodnem Atlantiku (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the submission of nominal catch statistics by Member States fishing in the north-east Atlantic (recast)
(prenovitev – člen 80a Poslovnika)
(Recast – Rule 80a of the Rules of Procedure)
MNENJE Odbora za ribištvo ..........................................................................................7
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ..................................................................7
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB V OBLIKI PISMA.11
ANNEX: OPINION IN LETTER FORM OF THE LEGAL SERVICES' CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY 11
(Postopek soodločanja: prenovitev)
(Codecision procedure – recast)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0763 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0763 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 285(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0440/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0440/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 80a in 51 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 80a and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za ribištvo( A6‑0214/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0214/2008 ),
2. poziva Komisijo, naj zadevo ponovno predloži Parlamentu, če namerava svoj predlog bistveno spremeniti ali nadomestiti z drugim besedilom;
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
Sklep Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji
Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission
1. podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil je bil spremenjen s sklepom 2006/512/ES Sveta z dne 17. julija 2006
1. was amended by Council Decision 2006/512/EC of 17 July 2006
S členom 5a spremenjenega sklepa 1999/468/ES je bil uveden nov regulativni postopek s pregledom, ki naj bi se uporabljal za ukrepe splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb temeljnega akta, sprejetega s postopkom soodločanja, vključno s črtanjem nekaterih takšnih določb ali z dopolnitvijo akta z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb.
Article 5a of amended Decision 1999/468/EC introduced the new 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny' (RPS) for 'measures of a general scope which seek to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with codecision, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements' .