natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja vedno večji interes številnih držav članic STO glede sporazuma ACTA, meni, da se je treba truditi za vključitev gospodarstev v vzponu, kot so Kitajska, Indija in Brazilija, ter regionalnih trgovinskih blokov, kot so Mercosur, Karibska skupnost (CARICOM) in ASEAN, v pogajanja o sporazumu ter se že od sedaj naprej obvežejo, da bodo na svojih ozemljih zagotavljale spoštovanje pravic intelektualne lastnine;
Welcomes the growing interest shown by a number of WTO countries in the ACTA, believes that efforts should be made to include emerging economies such as China, India, Brazil as well as regional trade blocs such as Mercosur, CARICOM and ASEAN, in order for them to take part in the negotiations of the agreement, inviting them from now to commit themselves to guarantee IPRs' respect in their territories;
26. s tem v zvezi poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi trajen in pregleden postopek javnega posvetovanja, se zavzema za koristi takega postopka z vsemi pogajalskimi državami ter Evropskemu parlamentu zagotovi redno in izčrpno obveščanje o trenutnem stanju pogajanj;
In this context, calls on the Commission to ensure a continuous and transparent public consultation process, and to support the benefits of such a process with all the negotiating countries, and to ensure that the Parliament is regularly and thoroughly informed about the state of play of the negotiations;
28. v okviru pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA opozarja Komisijo na člen 8 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, ki zadeva varstvo osebnih podatkov, in Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in prostem pretoku takih podatkov
Reminds the Commission of, within the framework of ACTA negotiations, Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which concerns the protection of personal data, and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
43). ne bi smel prevladati nad javnim interesom za razkritje pripravljalnih dokumentov za sporazum ACTA, med katerimi so tudi poročila o napredku, in za razkritje pogajalskega mandata Komisije, ter poziva Svet, naj uveljavi člen 255 Pogodbe ES tako, da se zagotovi čim širši dostop do dokumentov, pod pogojem, da so sprejeti potrebni varnostni ukrepi, kot jih terja zakonodaja o varstvu podatkov;
43). , and urges the Council to enforce Article 255 of the EC Treaty in such a way as to ensure the widest possible access to documents, provided that the necessary security measures are taken as required by data-protection law;
Ukrepi zunanje podpore v boju proti ponarejanju
External support measures in the fight against counterfeiting
Zakonodajna in organizacijska vprašanja
Regulatory and organisational issues
49. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva posebnosti uporabe spleta kot kanala za razpečevanje ponarejenih proizvodov in naj meri njegov vpliv na gospodarstvo držav članic tako, da razvije statistična orodja, ki bodo olajšala usklajen odziv;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the specific aspects of the use of the Internet as a channel for distributing counterfeit products and to measure its impact on the Member States' economies by developing statistical tools that can facilitate a coordinated response;
52. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo pobude za boljšo osveščenost potrošnikov o posledicah kupovanja ponarejenega blaga; poudarja, da mora imeti poslovni sektor v teh pobudah pomembno vlogo;
Asks the Commission and the Member States to encourage initiatives to raise consumer awareness of the consequences of buying counterfeit goods; stresses the important role the business sector has to play in such initiatives;
59. opozarja države članice, da je pomembno imeti patent Skupnosti in sodni sistem za patente, ki bi zagotavljala, da uporabniki na celotnem ozemlju Evropske unije spoštujejo pravice intelektualne lastnine, ter bi tako inovativnim podjetjem omogočila, da izume kar najbolje zaščitijo in unovčijo;
Reminds the Member States of the importance of having a Community patent and a jurisdictional system for patents as a way of ensuring compliance with users’ intellectual property rights throughout the Union, thus permitting innovative businesses to protect their inventions as much as possible and to profit from them to a greater extent;
UL L 196, 2.8.2003, str.
OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, p.7. in all Member States;
67. podpira, kar zadeva področje javnega zdravja, opredelitev Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije o ponarejanju zdravil: „zdravilo, ki je namerno in goljufivo napačno označeno glede identitete in/ali vira.
Supports, as regards the area of public health, the World Health Organisation definition of counterfeit medicine: “a medicine which is deliberately and fraudulently mislabelled with respect to identity and/or source.
Ponarejanje je možno pri izdelkih z blagovno znamko in generičnih izdelkih, ponarejanje izdelkov pa lahko vključuje izdelke s pravimi sestavinami ali napačnimi sestavinami, brez zdravilnih učinkovin ali s ponarejeno embalažo“;
Counterfeiting can apply to both branded and generic products and counterfeit products may include products with the correct ingredients or with the wrong ingredients, without active ingredients, with insufficient active ingredients or with fake packaging”;
Sklepne misli
Final considerations
70. poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja ukrepe, ki dopolnjujejo zakonodajne standarde in naj zlasti spodbuja večjo osveščenost o nevarnostih, ki jih prinaša ponarejanje, kar bi imelo za cilj spremembo odnosa ljudi do ponarejanja in piratstva;
Calls on the Commission to promote measures that are complementary to legislative standards and, in particular, to promote greater European awareness on the dangers of counterfeiting aimed at changing people's attitudes to counterfeiting and piracy;
V sporočilu Komisije Globalna Evropa iz leta 2006 je bilo priznano, da je treba v okviru večstranskih in dvostranskih pobud okrepiti zunanje vidike evropske konkurenčnosti in dati nov zagon boju proti ponarejanju v tretjih državah.
The 2006 Commission Communication ‘Global Europe’ acknowledged that, as far as multilateral and bilateral measures were concerned, the external aspects of European competitiveness needed to be strengthened and fresh momentum given to the fight against counterfeiting in third countries.
Stava v igri ni zanemarljiva.
There is a considerable amount at stake.
Trg ponarejenih izdelkov je vreden približno 500 milijard EUR, kar predstavlja okrog 7–10 % svetovne trgovine.
The counterfeiting market is worth approximately €500 billion, accounting for some 7-10% of world trade.
Evropsko gospodarstvo se je specializiralo na področju visoko-kakovostnih izdelkov z visoko dodano vrednostjo, ki jih pogosto varujejo pravice intelektualne lastnine.
The European economy has specialised in high-end, high value-added products, often protected by IPRs.
Varovanje intelektualne lastnine torej predstavlja nepogrešljiv instrument za podporo zunanji konkurenčnosti evropske industrije in ravno tako pomemben prispevek k uspehu lizbonske strategije.
The defence of IP is therefore an essential tool for bolstering the external competitiveness of European industry and has an equally important contribution to make to the success of the Lisbon strategy.
Vendar pa bi bilo zavajajoče misliti, da bodo nove pobude na področju boja proti ponarejanju vpeljane zgolj v izključnem interesu industrije Skupnosti.
It would, however, be misleading to believe that new anti-counterfeiting measures are being implemented in the sole interest of Community industry.
Poleg resne gospodarske škode, ki jo podjetjem povzročata ponarejanje in piratstvo, te nezakonite prakse vsako leto povzročajo izgubo nekaj sto tisoč kvalificiranih in dobro plačanih delovnih mest v Evropi (ocene kažejo na 200.000 izgubljenih delovnih mest) kot tudi drugje po svetu in lahko, v veliko primerih, ogrozijo zdravje potrošnikov, financirajo kriminalne in teroristične organizacije ter povzročajo veliko okoljsko škodo.
In addition to the serious economic damage caused to companies by counterfeiting and piracy, these unlawful practices are causing the loss of hundreds of thousands of skilled, well-paid jobs in Europe (where an estimated 200 000 jobs have been lost) and in other parts of the world each year and can often endanger consumers’ health, fund criminal and terrorist organisations and cause serious damage to the environment.
Ponarejanje je raznovrsten in spreminjajoč se pojav, ki z različno močjo prizadene skoraj vse gospodarske sektorje.
Counterfeiting is a multiform, diversified phenomenon which, with varying degrees of severity, affects nearly all economic sectors.
Časi, v katerih smo z lahkoto prepoznali okorno ponarejene luksuzne izdelke, so že minili.
The times of crude imitations of easily recognisable luxury products are now over.
Industrija ponarejanja in piratstva se je v zadnjih letih izredno razvila in se sedaj posveča izdelavi igrač, oblek, računalniških programov, zdravil, kozmetike, hrane, cigaret, rezervnih delov za avtomobile in letala.
Over the past few years the counterfeiting and piracy industry has been booming and now devotes itself to producing toys, clothing, computer programmes, medicines, cosmetics, foods, cigarettes and spare parts for cars and aircraft.
Vsi potrošniki se ne zavedajo, da z nakupom izdelkov, katerih izvor je negotov, storijo kaznivo dejanje in prispevajo k podpiranju vzporednih gospodarskih krogov, ki jim gospoduje organiziran kriminal.
Not all consumers realise that by purchasing products of dubious origin they are committing an offence and are helping to support parallel economic circuits dominated by organised crime.
Evropski parlament se je v zvezi s tem že izrekel in je poudaril, da je treba ločevati med neprofitno osebno uporabo in goljufivim in namenskim trženjem ponarejenih in piratskih izdelkov.
This Parliament has already expressed its views on the matter, stressing that personal use that is not for profit should be distinguished from the fraudulent and intentional marketing of counterfeit and pirated products.
Treba bo paziti na to ločevanje in oblikovati kampanje za osveščanje, ki bodo potrošnikom omogočile boljše razumevanje težav, ki jih povzroča njihov nepremišljen nakup.
Care should certainly be taken to make such a distinction, but awareness-raising campaigns should also be held, to give consumers a better understanding of the risks involved in their unwise purchases.
Ponarejanje se pogosto pojavlja v goljufivih in nevarnih oblikah.
Counterfeiting often assumes underhand and dangerous forms.
Predvideva se, da je 10 % zdravil ponarejenih.
For instance, it is calculated that 10% of medicines are counterfeit.
Ti izdelki, kot sicer tudi kozmetika, lahko vsebujejo potencialno nevarne snovi, in lahko povzročijo resno škodo za zdravje nevednega uporabnika.
These products, like cosmetics, may contain potentially harmful substances which can cause serious damage to the health of unaware users.
Kot na primer sirup proti kašlju, ki je vseboval sredstvo proti zmrzovanju, ki je leta 2006 v Panami povzročil smrt 130 oseb.
One example of this is the antifreeze cough mixture which caused more than 130 deaths in Panama in 2006.
Na enak način cvetoči trg kakovostnih prehrambenih ponarejenih izdelkov (med katerimi so vino in likerji), ne povzroča samo ogromne škode nadvse odlični evropski proizvodnji, ampak lahko predstavlja zaskrbljujočo nevarnost za potrošnike, zlasti na trgih, ki niso trg izvora sofisticiranega izdelka.
Likewise, the flourishing market in fake quality food products (including wines and spirits), in addition to causing very serious damage to European products of maximum excellence, may pose a worrying threat to consumers, especially in markets that are different from the market of origin of the adulterated product.
Boj proti ponarejanju pomeni torej zagotoviti, da potrošniki lahko svobodno in popolnoma varno izberejo blago, ki ga želijo kupiti.
Combating counterfeiting thus means ensuring that consumers can choose what they buy freely and in total safety.
Države v razvoju so prve žrtve ponarejanja in le redko razpolagajo s primernimi instrumenti za uspešen boj proti tej nadlogi.
Developing countries are the No 1 victims of counterfeiting and rarely have appropriate instruments with which successfully to combat this scourge.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba sprejeti posebne ukrepe za pomoč tem državam pri učinkovitem boju proti temu pojavu in za preprečevanje oblikovanja prostih con, ki jih nadzoruje organiziran kriminal.
The rapporteur takes the view that specific measures need to be taken to help them combat this phenomenon effectively and prevent the establishment of ‘free zones’ controlled by organised crime.
Zlasti pa je boj proti ponarejanju prehrambenih izdelkov in zdravil v državah v razvoju še vedno ena izmed prednostnih nalog zunanjega delovanja EU na področju boja proti ponarejanju.
In particular, the suppression of the counterfeiting of food products and medicines in developing countries remains one of the priorities of the EU’s external anti-counterfeiting action.
Cilj tega poročila je predstaviti dejanski in dosleden predlog usklajene in strukturirane evropske politike, ki bi obravnavala zunanje vidike boja proti ponarejanju.
The aim of this report is to put forward a concrete, consistent proposal for a coordinated, consistent European policy dealing with the external aspects of the fight against counterfeiting.
Boj proti ponarejanju mora postati ena izmed prednostnih nalog EU, njene posledice pa je treba ustrezno upoštevati pri opredelitvi trgovinske politike EU za naslednje desetletje.
The fight against counterfeiting should become one of the EU’s priorities and its implications should be taken into due consideration when framing the EU’s trade policy for the next decade.
Posodobitev sporazuma TRIPs
Modernising the TRIPS agreement
Ko je sporazum TRIPs postal veljaven, je predstavljal znaten napredek na področju svetovne discipline intelektualne lastnine, vendar pa rezultati niso bili vedno v skladu s pričakovanji, saj številne članice STO niso mogle ali niso hotele zagotoviti njegovega popolnega izvajanja.
When it entered into force, the TRIPS agreement was a firm step towards a world regulation of IP, but the results have not always lived up to expectations, since many WTO members have not been able, or have not wanted, to ensure that it was fully enforced.
Komisija bi zato morala spodbujati primerne diplomatske pobude za zagotavljanje dejstva, da vse članice STO pravilno uporabljajo minimalne standarde iz sporazuma TRIPs.
The Commission should therefore promote appropriate diplomatic initiatives with a view to ensuring that the minimum standards set out in the TRIPS agreement are correctly applied by all WTO members.
Sicer pa ta sporazum ni popoln in bi morali biti določeni deli ponovno pregledani.
On the other hand, the agreement in question is not perfect, and some parts of it should be revised.
Predvsem je treba razširiti področje njegove uporabe na operacije izvoza, tranzita in pretovarjanja kakor tudi na druge kršitve intelektualne lastnine.
In particular, its scope should be extended to export, transit and transhipment operations as well as to other IP infringements.
V primerih resnih kršitev sporazuma TRIPs pa EU ne bi smela oklevati in bi se morala obrniti na organ za reševanje sporov v okviru STO, tako za zagotovitev zaščite vpletenih evropskih strani kot za oblikovanje sodne prakse, ki bi lahko pojasnila vsebino sporazuma, da bi tako postalo njegovo izvajanje lažje in učinkovitejše.
In the event of serious breaches of the TRIPS agreement, the EU should not hesitate to take its case to the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body, both to ensure that the European parties concerned are defended and to build up a body of case-law to clarify the content of the agreement, thereby making it easier and more effective to implement.
Poročevalec je poleg tega prepričan, da je treba spodbujati in olajšati uporabo uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah za evropska podjetja, ki se srečujejo s težavami glede dostopa na zunanje trge zaradi nezakonite in nepravilne uporabe pravic intelektualne lastnine s strani lokalnih operaterjev.
The rapporteur is also convinced that the use of the TBR should be encouraged and facilitated for European companies complaining of problems of access to third-country markets owing to an illegitimate and in any case improper use of their IP rights by local operators.
Trgovinski sporazum proti ponarejanju (ACTA) in drugi dvostranskimi ter regionalnimi ukrepi Evropske unije
ACTA and other bilateral and regional EU initiatives
Tudi če je večstranski okvir STO še vedno glavna prednostna naloga EU pa je jasno, da se brez novih dvostranskih oziroma večstranskih pobud, kot je sporazum ACTA, ne bo moglo na mednarodni ravni učinkovito boriti proti pojavu ponarejanja.
However much the multilateral WTO framework remains the top priority for the EU, it is clear that without any further bilateral or multilateral initiatives such as the ACTA agreement, it will be impossible to combat counterfeiting effectively at the international level.
S tem v zvezi Parlament pričakuje, da bo ustrezno obveščen in da bo lahko prispeval k sporazumu še preden bo uradno predstavljen.
In this regard, Parliament expects to be kept duly informed and to be able to make its own contribution to the agreement in question before it is formally submitted.
Predlog sporazuma ACTA izvira iz potrebe po preseganju sporazuma TRIPs in potrebe po tem, da bi postal boj proti ponarejanju učinkovitejši in skladnejši.
The proposal concerning the ACTA agreement stemmed from the need to move beyond the TRIPS agreement and to make the fight against counterfeiting more effective and consistent.
S tega tališča je gotovo pozitivno dejstvo, da so se zaradi ponarejanja najbolj oškodovane industrializirane države, zlasti EU, ZDA in Japonska, odločile za usklajevanje svojih prizadevanj.
From this point of view, the fact that the industrialised countries that have been the most penalised by counterfeiting, such as the EU, USA and Japan, have decided to coordinate their efforts, is certainly to be welcomed.
Postopek je šele v začetni fazi, vendar pa je treba zagotoviti, da ne o prišlo do prekrivanja s sporazumom TRIPs, in da bodo končni cilji, ki se želijo doseči s sporazumom, zadosti jasni in realistični.
The process is still at the initial stage but care will need to be taken to ensure that it does not overlap with the TRIPS agreement and that the agreement’s ultimate objectives are sufficiently clear and realistic.
Poročevalec meni, da mora Komisija poleg sporazuma ACTA v vse nove sporazume o prosti izmenjavi, o katerih se bo pogajalo v naslednjih letih, vključiti klavzulo za varovanje pravic intelektualne lastnine (ki bo predvidela učinkovit sistem za reševanje sporov).
In addition to ACTA, the rapporteur takes the view that the Commission should include an IPR protection clause (providing for an efficient dispute settlement system) in all the new free trade agreements to be negotiated over the next few years.
Popolno spoštovanje obvez iz sporazuma TRIPs ter ostalih dvostranskih in večstranskih sporazumov bo zahtevalo od tretjih držav, zlasti od držav v razvoju, znatna gospodarska in organizacijska prizadevanja.
Full compliance with the obligations of TRIPS and other bilateral and multilateral agreements will require a substantial economic and organisational effort on the part of third countries, especially developing countries.
Poročevalec meni, da si mora EU vsaj delno prizadevati za reševanje te težave in državam, ki to zahtevajo in si prizadevajo za boj proti ponarejanju, ponuditi ustrezno gospodarsko in tehnično pomoč, tudi z dajanjem prednosti izobraževanju osebja in, kjer je mogoče, s sprejemanjem carinskih postopkov Skupnosti.
The rapporteur believes that the EU should take charge of this problem, at least in part, by providing those states which so request, and which show they are committed to the fight against counterfeiting, with appropriate economic and technical support, encouraging staff training and adopting, where possible, Community customs procedures.
Posebno bo treba poudariti boj proti ponarejanju v državah, kjer poteka tranzit blaga, in proti ponarejevalcem, ki uporabljajo ladje-tovarne, ki se nahajajo v ekstrateritorialnih vodah.
A special anti-counterfeiting effort should be made in countries through which goods transit and against those who use ‘factory ships’ located in extra-territorial waters.
‘Made in...’ and traceability of imported products
‘Made in...’ and traceability of imported products
If adopted, the proposal for a Council Regulation
If adopted, the proposal for a Council Regulation
2005/0254(ACC) introducing compulsory indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from third countries in the EU will not only increase the transparency of the origin of certain categories of product, such as textiles, which are often counterfeited, but will also make an important contribution to the fight against counterfeiting.
2005/0254 (ACC) introducing compulsory indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from third countries in the EU will not only increase the transparency of the origin of certain categories of product, such as textiles, which are often counterfeited, but will also make an important contribution to the fight against counterfeiting.
Poročevalec želi, da bi se premostile nerazumljive prepreke, ki so vse do sedaj upočasnjevale postopek tega predloga, in da bo mogoče hitro sprejeti to besedilo.
The rapporteur thus hopes that the incomprehensible divisions which have hitherto slowed down the procedure relating to this proposal may be overcome and that it may be swiftly adopted.
Istočasno bi bilo primerno, skupaj z zadevnimi industrijskimi sektorji, preučiti načine, ki bi omogočali, da bi carinske službe in končni potrošniki z lahkoto identificirali pristnost izdelkov iz tretjih držav.
At the same time it would also be advisable to look at, together with the industrial sectors involved, methods whereby the authenticity of products from third countries can be easily identified by customs operators, but also by final consumers.
Poročevalec meni, da potrebujemo boljše usklajevanje na ravni Skupnosti, če želimo doseči pomembne rezultate v zunanjem boju proti ponarejanju.
The rapporteur takes the view that better coordination at Community level is necessary in order to achieve major results in the external fight against counterfeiting.
Ne sme se več odlašati z oblikovanjem enotnega evropskega organa, ki bi imel za nalogo boj proti ponarejanju, in bi bil sposoben usklajevati prizadevanja držav članic kot tudi različnih služb Komisije.
The establishment of a single European authority responsible for combating counterfeiting and able to coordinate both the efforts of the Member States and those of the various Commission departments can no longer be postponed.
Temu novemu organu bo treba zagotoviti zadostna sredstva in pristojnosti, da bo lahko izvajal svoj mandat ob spoštovanju pristojnosti držav članic.
This new authority should be guaranteed sufficient resources and powers to be able to fulfil its mandate whilst respecting the competences of the Member States.
Komisija bo med drugim morala zagotoviti, da bodo različne službe, odgovorne za to pomembno področje, delovale na usklajen in harmoničen način.
The Commission should also ensure that, internally, the various departments responsible for this important topic work in a coordinated, harmonious manner.
Eden izmed vidikov boja proti ponarejanju, na katerem bi morale vztrajati tako države članice kot Komisija, je zaščita MSP, tako v Evropi kot v tretjih državah.
One of the aspects of the fight against counterfeiting on which both the Member States and the Commission should insist, is the defence of SMEs, both in Europe and in third countries.