natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(g) Komisija vsako leto poroča Parlamentu in Svetu o oceni učinka in učinkovitosti Evropske investicijske banke in Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj pri financiranju operacij ter njunem prispevku k izpolnjevanju ciljev zunanje politike Evropske unije ter o njunem medsebojnem sodelovanju in o sodelovanju z drugimi finančnimi institucijami ter
(g) the Commission report annually to Parliament and the Council on the assessment of the impact and effectiveness of EIB and EBRD financing operations as well as their respective contribution to the fulfilment of the external policy objectives of the European Union, and on their mutual cooperation as well as with other financial institutions; and
(h) se v Parlamentu organizira letna predstavitev predsednikov obeh bank skupaj s komisarjem za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve;
(h) annual hearings of the Presidents of both banks together with the Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs be organised in Parliament.
28. opominja na pomembnost sporazuma, doseženega v „Evropskem soglasju“, ki določa, da naj bi se krepile sinergije med programi, ki jih financira EIB in druge finančne institucije, ter programi, ki jih financira Skupnost, da bi zagotovili maksimalen učinek za države prejemnice; poudarja potrebo, da je treba pri tem posebej upoštevati interese prejemnikov;
Recalls the importance of the agreement stipulated in the "The European Consensus", which provides that there should be a strengthening of the synergies between the programmes supported by the EIB and other financial institutions and those financed by the Community in order to guarantee a maximum impact for the beneficiary countries; stresses the need to take particular account of the interests of the beneficiaries when so doing;
30. ugotavlja, da večnacionalne razvojne banke in institucije pozitivno vplivajo na svet v razvoju; meni, da je treba nadaljevati z analizo tega vpliva in preučiti nadaljnje aktivnosti v zvezi s cilji in operacijami Evropskega razvojnega sklada; predlaga, da bi bilo lastništvo zemljišč lahko upravičeno do financiranja pod pogoji, povezanimi z okoljskimi in socialnimi cilji, v okviru zunanjega mandata Evropske investicijske banke, saj je ključnega pomena za endogen razvoj, predvsem v afriških državah.
Notes that multinational development banks and institutions have a positive impact on the developing world; considers it to be necessary to further analyse their impact and to consider further activities in the context of the objectives and operations of the European Development Fund (EDF); suggests that the financing of land ownership conditional on environmental and social objectives could be an eligible investment cost under the EIB external mandate, as is key for endogenous development, especially in African countries.
31. poudarja pomembno vlogo, ki jo je EIB pridobila z evropskim načrtom za oživitev gospodarstva, zlasti kar zadeva okrepljeno financiranje za mala in srednje velika podjetja, obnovljive vire energije in čisti promet; pozdravlja odločitev o povečanju obsega posojil EIB v letu 2009 in 2010 za 30 % (15 milijard EUR) in odločitev o povečanju vpisanega kapitala EIB za 67 milijard EUR na 232 milijard EUR, v skladu z lizbonsko strategijo; poudarja, da bi morala biti dodatna sredstva namenjena doseganju dolgoročnih učinkov; meni, da večje pristojnosti narekujejo tako ustrezne človeške kot tudi finančne vire ter povečano transparentnost in odgovornost operacij EIB;
Stresses the important role which the European Economic Recovery Plan has assigned to the EIB, especially with regard to the enhanced financing for SMEs, energy from renewable sources, and clean transport; welcomes the decision to increase EIB lending volume by 30 % (EUR 15 billion) in 2009 and 2010 and the decision to increase the subscribed capital of the EIB by EUR 67 billion to EUR 232 billion, in line with the Lisbon Strategy; stresses those additional funds should aim to achieve long-term effects; considers that enlarged responsibilities necessitate both adequate human and financial resources and increased transparency and accountability of the EIB´s operations;
33. meni, da bi morali EIB in Komisija pospešiti izvajanje projektov v državah članicah ter v sektorjih, ki jih je kriza najbolj prizadela; s tega vidika meni, da je pomembno, da se uporabi strokovno znanje programov tehnične pomoči, kot so Jaspers, Jeremie, Jessica in Jasmine, da bi pospešili razdelitev strukturne pomoči;
Is of the opinion that the EIB and the Commission should accelerate the implementation of projects in the Member States as well as in the sectors which are most severely affected by the crisis; with that respect considers important to mobilise the expertise of the technical assistance programmes like Jaspers, Jeremie, Jessica and Jasmine, in order to speed up the distribution of structural aid;
36. ugotavlja, da se je najemanje in dajanje posojil s strani EIB tako znotraj kot zunaj Evropske unije postopoma povečalo in danes predstavlja glavno sredstvo za najemanje in posojanje na ravni EU; nadalje ugotavlja, da obstaja veliko povpraševanje, vključno z Azijo, po obveznicah Evropske investicijske banke; zato poziva EIB in njene guvernerje, da čim bolj povečajo možnosti najemanja posojil z izdajanjem obveznic, zlasti obveznic, ki se glasijo na euro, na globalnem trgu, da bi kot banka, ki sledi javni politiki, podprla dolgoročne cilje in ublažila posledice pešanja gospodarske rasti tako znotraj Evropske unije kot tudi v sosednjih državah;
Calls on Member States fully to exploit the instruments of venture capital, global loans, and micro credit facilities offered by the EIB programs and facilities;36.
39. poudarja, da je v sedanjem obdobju slabih kreditnih pogojev vloga obeh bank pomembna v Evropski uniji in zunaj nje; poziva obe banki, da še naprej izpolnjujeta svoje obveznosti do tretjih držav, tudi v gospodarsko težavnem obdobju;
Stresses that in the current period of tight credit conditions the role of the two banks is highlighted both inside and outside the European Union; calls on both banks to keep their commitments with regard to third countries even in economic difficult times;
Posledice sodbe Sodišča o zunanjem mandatu Evropske investicijske banke
The implications of the ruling of the Court of Justice on the external mandate of the EIB
45. predlaga, da usmerjevalni odbor svoje delo konča zgodaj v letu 2010, in poziva predsednika odbora, naj o sklepih kmalu za tem poroča Parlamentu in Svetu; pričakuje sklepe usmerjevalnega odbora in poziva odbor, da upošteva priporočila iz te resolucije in prejšnjih resolucij Parlamenta; poziva usmerjevalni odbor, da redno obvešča Parlament o svojem napredku;
Recommends that the Steering Committee finalise its work in early 2010 and invites the Chairman of the Committee to report on its conclusions to Parliament and the Council soon thereafter; looks forward to the conclusions of the Steering Committee and requests the committee to take into account the recommendations included in this resolution and in Parliament's earlier resolutions; requests that the Steering Committee inform Parliament regularly of its progress;
To je prvi primer, ko je Parlament pripravil skupno poročilo o dejavnostih Evropske investicijske banke in Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj.
This is the first time that the Parliament has drafted a report on the activities of the EIB and the EBRD concurrently.
Ker je Evropska investicijska banka institucija iz Pogodbe, Parlament vsako leto sprejme poročilo o njenih dejavnostih, za Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj pa poročilo objavi le občasno, kot na primer leta 2002.
As the EIB is a Treaty based institution, the Parliament adopts a report on its activities annually whereas a report is only adopted occasionally on the EBRD, as in 2002.
Obstajajo trije glavni razlogi, zakaj je treba sprejeti skupno poročilo za obe banki:
There are three main reasons as to the importance of adopting a report on the two banks concurrently:
1) Večje prekrivanje finančnih dejavnosti Evropske investicijske banke in Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj
1) Increasing overlaps in financing activities of the EIB and the EBRD
Evropska investicijska banka in Evropska banka za obnovo in razvoj vse pogosteje financirata dejavnosti na istih geografskih območjih zunaj EU, na primer v vzhodni Evropi, na južnem Kavkazu, v Rusiji, na zahodnem Balkanu, v bližnji prihodnosti pa tudi v Turčiji.
The EIB and the EBRD are increasingly financing operations in the same geographical regions outside the EU, for example in Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus, Russia, Western Balkans, and in the near future also in Turkey;
Naslednji podatki prikazujejo posojila Evropske investicijske banke zunaj EU v letu 2007: Azija in Latinska Amerika 925 milijonov EUR, vzhodna Evropa, južni Kavkaz in Rusija 230 milijonov EUR, države sredozemskega partnerstva 1438 milijonov EUR, predpristopne države 2870 milijonov EUR, države AKP 756 milijonov EUR in Južna Afrika 113 milijonov EUR.
The following figures represent EIB lending outside the EU in 2007: Asia and Latin America EUR 925 million, Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus and Russia EUR 230 million, Mediterranean Partner Countries EUR 1438 million, Pre-Accession Countries EUR 2870 million, ACP Countries EUR 756 million and South Africa EUR 113 million.
Letni poslovni obseg Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj je leta 2007 znašal 5,6 milijard EUR.
The annual business volume of the EBRD amounted to EUR 5.6 billion in 2007.
Zajemal je 353 projektov v 29 državah v srednji Evropi in v baltskih državah, v jugovzhodni Evropi, v zahodnem delu Skupnosti neodvisnih držav ter na Kavkazu, v Rusiji in v srednji Aziji.
This comprised 353 projects in 29 countries of operation in Central Europe and the Baltic States, South-eastern Europe, Western CIS and the Caucasus, Russia and Central Asia.
Sodelovanje med obema bankama se je razvilo na regionalni osnovi, način sodelovanja pa je različno organiziran glede na regijo.
The co-operation between the two banks has developed on a regional basis, thus, the way they co-operate is organised differently according to region.
V državah, kjer banki običajno delujeta, obstajajo trije načini sodelovanja med njima: memorandum o soglasju za vzhodno Evropo, kjer ima glavno vlogo Evropska banka za obnovo in razvoj, glavno pravilo pa so skupne naložbe, primer zahodnega Balkana, kjer je prišlo do prehoda s tekmovanja/vzporednih operacij do novega načina sodelovanja z zbiranjem sredstev in nedavno sprejet sporazum na podlagi opredelitve specifičnih in skupnih področij pristojnosti in prožnih načinov sodelovanja kot v primeru operacij financiranja v Turčiji.
In countries of common operation, there are three different methods of cooperation between the EIB and the EBRD; the MoU for Eastern Europe with the EBRD in the lead and joint investment as a general rule; the Western Balkans where there is a move from "competition"/parallel operations to new ways of cooperation by pooling of funds; and recently to an agreement based on the definition of specific and common areas of competence and flexible ways of cooperation as in the case of financing operations in Turkey.
Tak razvoj ni zadovoljiv.
This is not a satisfactory development.
Bolj praktično bi bilo organizirati celovit pregled, kjer bi obravnavali načine za izboljšanje sodelovanja med bankama in drugimi zadevnimi stranmi, pri tem pa upoštevali interese EU in držav prejemnic.
Instead, it would be more useful if a comprehensive review was organised, underlying how the cooperation between the two banks and other relevant parties could be improved, taking into account the interests of the EU and the beneficiary countries.
Že od začetka je jasno, da so cilji, strokovno znanje in način delovanja bank različni.
It is clear from the outset that the objectives, expertise and modus operandi of the two banks are different.
Poleg tega delitve dela in sodelovanja med obema bankama ni mogoče upravljati zgolj na regionalni osnovi ali z ločevanjem med posojili javnemu in privatnemu sektorju.
Furthermore the division of labour and cooperation between the two banks cannot simply be managed on a regional basis or by drawing a line between lending to the public sector and the private sector.
To poročilo je namenjeno opredelitvi področij, kjer bi banki lahko učinkoviteje sodelovali, da bi za svoje delničarke, zainteresirane strani in države prejemnice ustvarili večjo dodano vrednost.
This report is focussed on identifying areas where the two banks could work more efficiently together in order to give greater value-added to their shareholders, stakeholders and beneficiary countries.
Sledijo konkretna priporočila glede okrepljenega sodelovanja:
The following are concrete recommendations made in respect of increased cooperation:
(a) instituciji morata izboljšati funkcionalno delitev dela, da bi dosegli večjo specializacijo in se osredotočili na svoje sposobnosti in krepke točke, kot so zmožnost obsežnega financiranja pri Evropski investicijski banki ter prisotnost in znanje na lokalni ravni pri Evropski banki za obnovo in razvoj;
(a) the two institutions to have an improved functional division of labour in a path towards greater specialisation, to focus on their respective skills and strengths, such as large-scale financing capacities by EIB and local level presence and knowledge by EBRD;
(b) Evropska investicijska banka se mora specializirati za financiranje obsežnejših javnih in zasebnih infrastruktur ter projektov, vključno z naložbami v javno-zasebna partnerstva ter tujimi neposrednimi naložbami iz podjetij EU; Evropska banka za obnovo in razvoj pa naj se specializira za naložbe manjšega obsega, izgradnjo institucij, privatizacijo, trgovinske olajšave, finančne trge in neposredne kapitalske naložbe za spodbujanje standardov upravljanja podjetij;
(b) EIB to specialise more in financing of larger scale private and public infrastructures and projects, including public-private-partnership (PPP) investments as well as foreign direct investments from EU companies; EBRD to specialise more in smaller scale investments, institution building, privatisation, trade facilitation, financial markets, and direct equity investments to promote corporate governance standards;
(d) izvajanje kulture sodelovanja v obeh institucijah, tako od vrha navzdol kot na nižjih ravneh;
(d) the implementation of a culture of cooperation in both institutions, both top-down and on the ground.
(e) banki naj pripravita splošen predlog o doslednejšem sodelovanju, vključno z razmislekom o skupnih standardih, v korist delničark, zainteresiranih strani in držav prejemnic;
(e) the two banks to come up with a global proposal on more consistent cooperation, including a reflection on common standards, to the benefit of their shareholders, stakeholders and beneficiary countries,
(f) banki naj o sodelovanju redno poročata Komisiji;
(f) the two banks to regularly report to the Commission on their cooperation;
(g) Komisija naj vsako leto poroča Parlamentu in Svetu o oceni učinka in učinkovitosti Evropske investicijske banke in Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj pri financiranju operacij ter njunem prispevku k izpolnjevanju ciljev zunanje politike EU ter o njunem medsebojnem sodelovanju in o sodelovanju z drugimi finančnimi institucijami ter
(g) the Commission to report annually to the Parliament and the Council on the assessment of the impact and effectiveness of EIB and EBRD financing operations as well as their respective contribution to the fulfilment of the external policy objectives of the EU, and on their mutual cooperation as well as with other financial institutions; and
(h) v Parlamentu je treba organizirati letno predstavitev predsednikov obeh bank skupaj s komisarjem za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve.
(h) to organise annual hearings in the European Parliament of the Presidents of the two banks together with the Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs,
2) Zaradi kreditne krize je delo obeh bank še pomembnejše
2) The credit crisis makes the work of the two banks even more important
V sedanjem obdobju kreditne krize so finančne operacije obeh bank in njuno medsebojno sodelovanje še pomembnejše za zagotavljanje kreditov, ki jih javni in zasebni sektor močno potrebujeta.
In the current period of tight credit conditions, the financial operations and mutual cooperation of the two banks is of even greater significance, in terms of providing much needed credit to the public and private sector.
Financiranje malih in srednje velikih podjetij je na primer odločilnega pomena v EU in zunaj nje.
For example, the financing of SMEs is critical both inside and outside the EU.
Bančni sektor v sosedskih regijah EU se sooča z velikimi težavami.
For example, the banking sector is now seriously squeezed in the EU neighbourhood regions.
Prav tako je pomembno, da banki dejavno spodbujata projekte za boj proti podnebnim spremembam in uporabo obnovljivih virov energije.
It is also important that the two banks are active in promoting projects aimed at combating climate change and fostering renewable energy sources.
3) Izvajati je treba sodbo Sodišča o mandatu Evropske investicijske banke za zunanje posojanje
3) T he ruling of the Court Of Justice on the external lending mandate of the EIB needs to be implemented
Sodba Sodišča z dne 6. novembra 2008 o pravni podlagi Sklepa Sveta 2006/1016/ES ustrezno kaže na pomembno vlogo, ki jo bo Parlament imel v postopkih soodločanja glede mandata Evropske investicijske banke za zunanja posojila.
The ruling of the Court of Justice of 6 November 2008 on the legal basis of the Council Decision 2006/1016/EC is a timely indication of the important role that the Parliament will have in the co-decision procedure of the external lending mandate of the EIB.
Sklep Sveta 2006/1016/ES, ki obravnava jamstva za finančne operacije Evropske investicijske banke v državah v razvoju in ostalih tretjih državah temelji zgolj na členu 181a Pogodbe o ES (gospodarsko sodelovanje s tretjimi državami).
The Council Decision 2006/1016EC which covers guarantees to the EIB for financial operations in developing countries and other third countries is based on Article 181a EC (economic cooperation with third countries) alone.
Evropski parlament je ta sklep spodbijal, saj bi bilo po njegovem mnenju treba dodati člen 179 Pogodbe o ES (razvojno sodelovanje) kot drugo pravno podlago.
The European Parliament challenged this Decision as in its view Article 179 EC (development cooperation) should be added as a second legal basis.
To vprašanje je pomembno za sodelovanje Parlamenta, saj člen 179 določa postopek soodločanja, medtem ko člen 181 določa le postopek posvetovanja.
The issue at stake is of importance for the involvement of Parliament, as Article 179 EC provides for the co-decision procedure whilst Article 181a EC only provides for consultation.
Sodišče je bilo mnenja, da sklep, prek finančnega sodelovanja z državami v razvoju, teži tudi k doseganju socioekonomskih ciljev iz člena 177 Pogodbe o ES.
The Court considered that the Decision, through financial cooperation with developing countries, also pursues the socio-economic objectives referred to in Article 177 EC.
Kadar sklep zadeva države v razvoju iz Naslova XX Pogodbe o ES, spada pod ta naslov in se zanj uporablja člen 179.
Therefore, as far as the Decision concerns developing countries, within the meaning of Title XX EC Treaty, it falls under that title and thus under Article 179 EC.
Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi, da se naslova XX in XXI Pogodbe ter posledično njena člena 179 in 181 dopolnjujeta in da postopkov, določenih s temi določbami, ne moremo obravnavati kot nezdružljive.
Finally, the Court held that a complementary relationship exists between Titles XX and XXI of the treaty, and thus between Articles 179 and 181a EC respectively and that the procedures laid down in these provisions cannot be classified as incompatible.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da se uporablja postopek soodločanja.
The court ruled that the co-decision procedure should apply.
To je zelo pomembno za Evropski parlament, saj ima zdaj mnogo večjo vlogo pri odločanju o zunanjem mandatu Evropske investicijske banke.
This has very significant implications for the European Parliament as it now has a much greater role to play in deciding upon the external mandate of the EIB.
Parlament ima tako potrebno pravno podlago za usklajevanje s Svetom glede načina delovanja Evropske investicijske banke zunaj EU.
It gives the Parliament the necessary legal basis to co-ordinate with the Council as to how the EIB should operate outside the EU.
To je zelo dobrodošel napredek.
This is a very necessary development.
Sodišče je odločilo, da se učinek sklepa 2006/1016/ES ohrani le za določbe Evropske investicijske banke o financiranju, ki so začele veljati v 12 mesecih od datuma sodbe Sodišča.
The Court ordered that the effects of the Decision 2006/1016/EC be maintained only for EIB finance arrangements entered into force within a period of 12 months from the date of the ruling of the court.
Izvajanje tega časovnega razporeda bo predstavljalo velik izziv, prav tako pa je zelo nenavadno, da Sodišče takšno odredbo vključi v svojo sodbo o postopku soodločanja med institucijami.
This timetable will be very challenging to implement in practice and it is very rare that the Court includes such an order in its ruling relating to the co-decision procedure between the institutions.
Izziv je še večji, če upoštevamo parlamentarne volitve, ki bodo prihodnje leto.
This is even more challenging when taking into account the Parliament elections next year.
o letnih poročilih Evropske investicijske banke ter Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj za leto 2008
on 2007 Annual Reports of the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Odbor za proračunski nadzor poziva Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgetary Control calls on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
a. upravni mehanizem izključitve za podjetja, pri katerih EIB in druge multilateralne razvojne banke ugotovijo korupcijo,
a. an administrative debarment mechanism for companies found guilty of corruption by the EIB and other multilateral development banks;
b. politika zašite notranjih informatorjev ter
b. a whistleblower protection policy; and
c. okrepitev preiskovalne funkcije EIB ter izboljšanje funkcije za preprečevanje in odkrivanje;
c. the reinforcement of its investigative function and the enhancement of the preventive and detective role of this function;
4. je zadovoljen, da je upravni odbor EIB odobril politiko EIB o mehanizmu za pritožbe; kljub temu ponovno poziva EIB, naj pregleda svoj notranji mehanizem za pritožbe in izda nove smernice zanj, razširjene na vse dejavnosti, ki jih financira EIB;
Is satisfied with the approval by the EIB Management Committee of the EIB Complaints Mechanism Policy; reiterates however its call on the EIB to review its internal grievance mechanism and to issue new appeal mechanism guidelines extended to all EIB-financed operations;
Uredba št. 1367/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2006 o uporabi določb aarhuške konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah v institucijah in organih Skupnosti ( UL L 264, 25.9.2006, str.
Regulation No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies (OJ L 264, 25.9.2006, p.
13). pozdravlja objavo poročila EIB o oceni poslovanja za leto 2007 in spodbuja EIB, naj še nadalje razvija dejavnosti svojega oddelka za oceno poslovanja;
13). ; welcomes the publication of its Operations Evaluations Overview report 2007 and encourages the EIB to further develop the activities of its Operations Evaluation department;