natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročilo Huguesa Martina ( A5-0448/2002 , 2002/2058(INI) ), sprejeto na plenarnem zasedanju 16. januarja 2003. predložil zakonodajno resolucijo, zagotovo ni prispevalo k izboljšanju preglednosti zakonodajnega okvira.
Hugues Martin report ( A5-0448/2002 , 2002/2058(INI) ), adopted in plenary on 16.01.2003. , has failed to increase the transparency of the regulatory framework.
Ravno obratno, Komisija in Svet sta (pogosto s postopkom komitologije
On the contrary, the Commission and Council have continued to adopt, often via the comitology procedure
Na primer Uredba (ES) 710/2009, objavljena v UL ES 5. avgusta 2009, ki spreminja uredbo 834/2007. ) nadaljevala s sprejemanjem izvedbenih ukrepov za ribogojni sektor (ekološki ali neekološki), o katerih Evropski parlament do sedaj ni mogel neposredno izraziti svojega mnenja.
e.g. Regulation (EC) 710/2009, published in the OJ of 5 August 2009 and amending Regulation 834/2007. , detailed rules applicable to aquaculture (organic and otherwise), in respect of which Parliament has had no opportunity whatsoever to voice a direct opinion.
Nedavno sporočilo Komisije iz aprila 2009, na podlagi katerega je nastalo to poročilo, daje novo pobudo za preučitev možnosti za poseben okvir Skupnosti za ribogojni sektor, končni cilj pa ostaja strukturiran razvoj evropskega trajnostnega ribogojstva, ki bo upošteval okoljsko ravnovesje, dal večjo ekonomsko vrednost izvajalcem v sektorju in njihovim lokalnim skupnostim ter večje jamstvo potrošnikom.
The recent Commission communication of April 2009 which forms the subject of this report therefore provides the chance to assess the appropriateness of introducing a specific EU framework for the aquaculture sector, with the ultimate objective remaining the structured development of a sustainable European aquaculture industry which respects environmental balances, increases the economic worth of aquaculture operators and their local communities and offers consumers more guarantees.
Med oblikovanimi predlogi za ribogojni sektor in okvirom nove skupne ribiške politike za obdobje po letu 2012, ki je v fazi oblikovanja, bo treba tudi oceniti ustrezne sinergije na zakonodajni in operativni ravni.
It will also be appropriate to assess the relevant synergies - at both legislative and operational level - between the proposals formulated by the aquaculture industry and the framing of the new CFP which is currently being developed for the period post-2012.
o novi pobudi za strategijo za trajnostni razvoj evropskega ribogojstva
on a new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture
A. ker morajo biti vse oblike ribogojstva trajnostne in družbeno pravične, kar pomeni, da se ne sme povzročati škoda ekosistemom zaradi večje koncentracije naravnih snovi in snovi, ki jih proizvaja človek, kot so nerazgradljive kemikalije in ogljikov dioksid, ali zaradi fizičnih motenj,
A. whereas all forms of aquaculture must be sustainable and socially just and, consequently, no harm must be done to ecosystems through an increase in the concentrations of natural substances and in the concentrations of substances produced by humans, such as non‑degradable chemicals and carbon dioxide, and through physical disturbance,
B. ker okoljsko trajnostne oblike ribogojstva lahko pozitivno prispevajo k varstvu okolja in so alternativen način, kako v veliki meri zadostiti povpraševanju po ribiških proizvodih,
B. whereas environmentally sustainable forms of aquaculture could make a positive contribution to environmental protection as well as providing an alternative way of meeting much of the demand for fisheries products,
C. ker se zaradi ribogojstva in z njim povezanih proizvodnih objektov ljudi ne sme sistematično prikrajšati pri zadovoljevanju osnovnih potreb po hrani, vodi in bivališčih,
C. whereas aquaculture and the associated production facilities must not lead to people being systematically deprived of what they need to meet their basic needs with regard to food, water and housing,
D. ker ribe lahko občutijo bolečino in stres, veliko oblik ribogojstva pa ne izpolnjuje zahtev Evropske unije za dobro počutje živali, in ker ustrezno upoštevanje in izvajanje standardov o dobrem počutju živali lahko prinese precejšnje koristi, kot so bolj kakovostni proizvodi in manjša škoda za okolje,
D. whereas fish can suffer pain and stress and many forms of aquaculture do not meet the EU's requirements for animal welfare, and whereas proper consideration and implementation of animal welfare standards can result in significant benefits, such as improved product quality and less environmental damage,
E. ker je Evropska unija neto uvoznica proizvodov iz ribogojstva in ker je treba uvesti zanesljiv sistem certificiranja proizvodov iz ribogojstva,
E. whereas the EU is a net importer of aquaculture products; whereas, furthermore, a reliable certification system for aquaculture products is needed,
F. ker se z ribogojstvom ustvarja vedno več novih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst za prehrano,
F. whereas more and more new animal breeds and plant varieties are being produced for consumption by means of aquaculture,
G. ker je Evropska komisija nedavno objavila sporočilo o Strategiji za trajnostni razvoj evropskega ribogojstva
G. whereas the Commission recently published a Communication on 'A Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture'
KOM(2009)0162 konč., Izgradnja trajnostne prihodnosti ribogojstva: Nova pobuda za Strategijo za trajnostni razvoj evropskega ribogojstva. ,
COM(2009) 162 final, Building a sustainable future for aquaculture: A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture. ,
2. poziva Komisijo, naj v strategiji trajnostnega ribogojstva bolj upošteva dobro počutje rib (in pri tem upošteva, da so domnevno zmožne misliti in čutiti) in naj poleg tega izvede raziskavo o kazalnikih dobrega počutja, načinih omamljanja in poboja ter načinih prevoza rib;
Calls on the Commission to take greater account of the welfare of fish (having regard to their putative ability to think and feel) in its sustainable aquaculture strategy and, further, to carry out research into welfare indicators, stunning and slaughtering methods and transport mechanisms for fish;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj neposredno razišče načine proizvodnje na ribjih farmah izven Evropske unije ter naj poroča o nevarnostih za zdravje;
Calls on the Commission to investigate at first hand production methods on fish farms outside the European Union and report on any health hazards;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj nujno pripravi posebna merila in smernice za sektor ribogojstva o razlaganju in izvajanju direktiv EU o presoji vplivov na okolje; poudarja, da ta prizadevanja ne bi smela ovirati nacionalnih vlad in lokalnih oblasti pri določanju lastnih meril in smernic, kjer bodo upoštevane posebne lokalne razmere;
Calls on the Commission to draw up, as a matter of urgency, specific criteria and guidelines for the aquaculture sector dealing with the interpretation and implementation of EU directives on environmental impact assessments; stresses that this effort should not undermine the ability of national governments and local authorities to set their own criteria and guidelines, taking site-specific conditions into account;
11. poziva Komisijo, naj določi smernice za reševanje sporov glede dejavnosti ribogojstva, ki nastajajo ob izvajanju okvirne direktive o vodah; vendar poudarja, da te smernice ne smejo ogroziti splošnega cilja dobrega stanja voda, določenega v okvirni direktivi o vodah
Calls on the Commission to issue guidance on the resolution of conflicts arising out of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive regarding aquaculture activities; stresses, however, that this guidance should not jeopardise the overall objective of good water status, as set out in the Water Framework Directive
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike, UL L 327, 22.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, OJ L 327, 22.12.2000. ;
Sporočilo Komisije KOM(2007)0575 konč. – Celostna pomorska politika za Evropsko unijo. spodbuja razvoj pomorskega prostorskega načrtovanja kot načina za usklajevanje ukrepov Skupnosti na povezanih področjih, vključno z ribogojstvom;
Commission Communication COM(2007) 575 final - 'An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union'. as a way of coordinating Community action in related fields, including aquaculture;
o novostih na področju javnih naročil
on new developments in public procurement
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................26
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................29
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti s posebnim poudarkom na spremembah, ki jih je uvedla Lizbonska pogodba,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, with particular reference to the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju direktiv 2004/18/ES in 2004/17/ES o javnih naročilih ter Direktive 2007/66/ES o pravnih sredstvih pri javnih naročilih,
– having regard to Directives 2004/18/EC and 2004/17/EC on procedures for the award of public contracts and Directive 2007/66/EC on review procedures concerning the award of public contracts,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. novembra 2009 „Aktiviranje zasebnih in javnih naložb za oživitev gospodarstva in dolgoročne strukturne spremembe: razvijanje javno-zasebnih partnerstev“ (KOM(2009) 615),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 19 November 2009 entitled ‘Mobilising private and public investment for recovery and long term structural change: developing Public Private Partnerships’ ( COM(2009)0615 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. maja 2009 „Prispevek k trajnostnemu razvoju: vloga pravične trgovine in nevladnih sistemov zagotavljanja trajnosti, povezanih s trgovino“ (KOM(2009) 215),,
– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 May 2009 entitled ‘Contributing to Sustainable Development: The role of Fair Trade and non-governmental trade-related sustainability assurance schemes’ ( COM(2009)0215 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. julija 2008 „Javna naročila za boljše okolje“ ( KOM(2008)0400 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 16 July 2008 entitled ‘Public procurement for a better environment’ ( COM(2008)0400 ),
– ob upoštevanju razlagalnega sporočila Komisije z dne 5. februarja 2008 „o uporabi zakonodaje Skupnosti v zvezi z javnimi naročili in koncesijami za institucionalizirana javno-zasebna partnerstva“ C(2007)6661,
– having regard to the Commission interpretative communication of 5 February 2008 on the application of Community law on Public Procurement and Concessions to Institutionalised Public-Private Partnerships (IPPP) (C(2007)6661),
– ob upoštevanju navodil dobrega ravnanja za boljši dostop malih in srednjih podjetij do javnih naročil (delovni dokument služb Komisije ( SEC(2008)2193 )),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled ‘European Code of Best Practices Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts’ ( SEC(2008)2193 ),
– ob upoštevanju razlagalnega sporočila Komisije z dne 1. avgusta 2006 o zakonodaji Skupnosti, ki velja za oddajo javnih naročil, ki niso zajeta ali so samo delno zajeta v direktivah o javnih naročilih
– having regard to the Commission interpretative communication of 1 August 2006 on the Community law applicable to contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the Public Procurement Directives
UL C 179, 1.8.2006, str.
OJ C 179, 1.8.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju naslednjih sodb Sodišča:
– having regard to the following judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU):
– z dne 19. aprila 2007, C-295/05, Tragsa,
– of 19 April 2007 in Case C-295/05 (Tragsa),
– z dne 18. decembra 2007, C-532/03, Komisija proti Irski, Irish rescue services,
– of 18 December 2007 in Case C-532/03, Commission v Ireland (Irish rescue services),
– z dne 13. novembra 2008, C-324/07, Coditel Brabant,
– of 13 November 2008 in Case C-324/07 (Coditel Brabant),
– z dne 9. junija 2009, C-480/06, Komisija proti Nemčiji, Stadtwerke Hamburg,
– of 9 June 2009 in Case C-480/06, Commission v Germany (Stadtwerke Hamburg),
– z dne 10. septembra 2009, C-206/08, Eurawasser,
– of 10 September 2009 in Case C-206/08 (Eurawasser),
– z dne 9. oktobra 2009, C-573/07, Sea Srl,
– of 9 October 2009 in Case C-573/07 (Sea s.r.l.),
– z dne 15. oktobra 2009, C-196/08, Acoset,
– of 15 October 2009 in Case C-196/08 (Acoset),
– z dne 15. oktobra 2009, C-275/08, Komisija proti Nemčiji, Datenzentrale Baden-Württemberg,
– of 15 October 2009 in Case C-275/08, Commission v Germany (Datenzentrale Baden- Württemberg),
– z dne 25. marca 2010, C-451/08, Helmut Müller,
– of 25 March 2010 in Case C-451/08 (Helmut Müller),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 10. februarja 2010 „Prispevanje k trajnostnemu razvoju: vloga pravične trgovine in nevladnih sistemov zagotavljanja trajnosti, povezanih s trgovino“ (RELEX-IV-026),
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 10 February 2010 on ‘Contributing to Sustainable Development: The role of Fair Trade and non-governmental trade-related sustainability assurance schemes’ (RELEX-IV-026),
– ob upoštevanju naslednjih študij:
– having regard to the following studies:
– ‘Evaluation of Public Procurement Directives: Markt/2004/10/D Final Report’, Europe Economics, 15. september 2006,
– ‘Evaluation of Public Procurement Directives: Markt/2004/10/D Final Report’, Europe Economics, 15 September 2006,
– ‘The Institutional Impacts of EU Legislation on Local and Regional Governments: A Case Study of the 1999/31/EC Landfill Waste and 2004/18/EC Public Procurement Directives’, European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), september 2009,
– ‘The Institutional Impacts of EU Legislation on Local and Regional Governments: A Case Study of the 1999/31/EC Landfill Waste and 2004/18/EC Public Procurement Directives’, European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), September 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 3. februarja 2009 o predkomercialnih naročilih: spodbujanje inovacij za zagotavljanje visokokakovostnih trajnostnih javnih storitev v Evropi
– having regard to its resolution of 3 February 2009 on pre-commercial procurement: driving innovation to secure sustainable high-quality public services in Europe
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. junija 2007 o specifičnih težavah pri prenosu in izvajanju zakonodaje o javnih naročilih in odnosu do Lizbonske agende
– having regard to its resolution of 20 June 2007 on specific problems in the transposition and implementation of public procurement legislation and its relation to the Lisbon Agenda
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2006 o javno-zasebnih partnerstvih in zakonodaji Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil in koncesij
– having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2006 on public-private partnerships and Community law on public procurement and concessions
UL C 313E, 20.12.2006, str.
OJ C 313E, 20.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2006 o pravični trgovini in razvoju
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2006 on Fair Trade and development
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0320 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0320 .
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov in mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0151/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0151/2010 ),
A. ker se je v gospodarski in finančni krizi pokazalo, kako velik gospodarski pomen imajo javna naročila, ker so vplivi krize na lokalne oblasti že jasno vidni in ker lahko državni organi svoje naloge dobro izpolnijo v korist vseh samo, če imajo ustrezno pravno varnost in postopki niso preveč zapleteni,
A. whereas the economic and financial market crisis has highlighted the vital economic importance of public procurement, whereas the effects of the crisis on local authorities are already clearly evident, and whereas at the same time public authorities can perform their tasks properly in the public interest only if they can count on the requisite legal certainty in this area and if procurement procedures are not too complex,
B. ker je dobro delujoč trg javnih naročil bistvenega pomena za notranji trg zaradi spodbujanja čezmejne konkurence, inovacij in nizkoogljičnega gospodarstva ter doseganja optimalne vrednosti za javne organe,
B. whereas a well-functioning procurement market is essential for the internal market, in order to encourage cross-border competition, stimulate innovation, promote a low-carbon economy and achieve optimal value for public authorities,
C. ker je namen zakonodaje o javnih naročilih zagotavljati, da se javna sredstva pametno in učinkovito upravljajo, in nuditi zainteresiranim družbam priložnost, da dobijo naročila v okviru pravične konkurence,
C. whereas public procurement law serves to ensure that public funds are managed soundly and efficiently and to give interested companies the opportunity to be awarded public contracts in a context of fair competition,
D. ker je bil namen revizije direktiv o javnih naročilih iz leta 2004 doseči poenostavitev, posodobitev in večjo prožnost ter pravno varnost,
D. whereas the 2004 revision of the public procurement directives was intended to simplify and modernise the relevant procedures, make them more flexible and establish greater legal certainty,
E. ker je bila z Lizbonsko pogodbo v primarni zakonodaji Evropske unije prvič priznana pravica do samouprave regionalnih in lokalnih organov, bilo je okrepljeno načelo subsidiarnosti, pravica do vlaganja tožb na Sodišče EU pa je bila uvedena tako za nacionalne parlamente kot Odbor regij,
E. whereas the Lisbon Treaty has incorporated into European Union primary law the first acknowledgement of the right to regional and local self-government, consolidated the concept of subsidiarity and granted both the national parliaments and the Committee of the Regions the right to bring actions before the CJEU,
F. ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti obravnavalo nesorazmerno število primerov kršitev na tem področju, kar kaže, da imajo številne države članice težave pri izpolnjevanju direktiv o javnih naročilih,
F. whereas the European Court of Justice has examined a disproportionate number of infringement cases in this area, indicating that many Member States have struggled to comply with the public procurement directives,
G. ker Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije vključuje pojem socialnega tržnega gospodarstva, socialno klavzulo in protokol o storitvah splošnega pomena, ki opredeljuje vrednote, skupne vsej Uniji, da bi zagotovila, da se evropska politika razvija tako, da izpolnjuje hotenja evropskih državljanov,
G. whereas, with a view to ensuring that European policies develop in such a way as to meet the aspirations of Europe’s citizens, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union incorporates the notion of a social market economy, a social clause and a protocol on services of general interest defining the shared values of the Union,
H. ker konvencija 94 Mednarodne organizacije dela določa, da morajo splošna javna naročila vsebovati klavzule, ki zagotavljajo pravično plačilo in delovne pogoje, ki niso slabši od tistih, ki so dogovorjeni denimo v kolektivnih pogodbah,
.H. whereas ILO Convention 94 stipulates that general public contracts shall contain clauses ensuring equitable remuneration, and labour conditions which are not less favourable than those laid down in collective agreements, for example,
Splošne opombe in priporočila
General remarks and recommendations
3. opozarja, da mora zaradi tega razvoja javni naročnik pogosto pred političnimi potrebami prednostno upoštevati pravno varnost, zaradi pritiska na javne proračune pa mora naročilo ali storitev pogosto oddati najcenejšemu namesto ekonomsko najugodnejšemu ponudniku; se boji, da bo to ošibilo inovacijsko osnovo in globalno konkurenčnost EU; poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša to stanje in oblikuje strateške ukrepe za spodbujanje javnih naročnikov k oddajanju naročil ponudnikom z najgospodarnejšo in najkvalitetnejšo ponudbo;
Points out that as a result of this development public procurers often have to prioritise legal certainty above policy needs and, given the pressure on public budgets, frequently have to award the contract or service in question to the cheapest offer rather than the most economically advantageous tender; is afraid that this will weaken the EU’s innovative base and global competitiveness; urges the Commission to remedy this situation and to develop strategic measures to encourage and empower public procurers to award contracts to the most economical, highest-quality offers;
6. meni, da bi morala biti javna naročila pregledna in odprta za javni nadzor, saj zadevajo javna sredstva; prosi Komisijo za pojasnilo, da se zagotovi pravna varnost lokalnim in drugim javnim organom in da lahko ti svoje državljane obvestijo o svojih pogodbenih obveznostih;
Takes the view that, since public contracts concern public funds, they should be transparent and open to public scrutiny; asks the Commission for clarification with a view to ensuring legal certainty for local and other public authorities and enabling them to inform citizens of their contractual obligations;
Javno-javno sodelovanje
Public-public c ooperation
– namen partnerstva je opravljanje nalog javnih storitev v pristojnosti vseh udeleženih lokalnih oblasti,
– the purpose of the partnership is the provision of a public-service task conferred on all the local authorities concerned,
– naloga se opravlja samo prek javnih organov, torej brez udeležbe zasebnikov, in
– the task is carried out solely by the public authorities concerned, i.e. without the involvement of private individuals or undertakings, and
– dejavnost se v glavnem opravlja v imenu udeleženih javnih organov;
– the activity involved is essentially performed on behalf of the public authorities concerned;
11. poudarja, da zaključki ne le, da Sodišča Evropske unije v omenjeni sodbi veljajo neposredno za sodelovanje med lokalnimi organi, pač pa je njihova veljavnost splošna, kar pomeni, da jih je mogoče uporabljati za sodelovanje med drugimi javnimi naročniki;
Points out that the CJEU’s conclusions in the aforementioned judgment not only apply directly to cooperation between local authorities but are generally valid, with the result that they can be applied to cooperation between other public contracting authorities;