natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prostovoljstvo podpira lizbonske cilje s:
Volunteering supports the Lisbon Objectives by:-
l) spodbujanjem zaposljivosti
1) Promoting employability
Prostovoljstvo ima pomembno vlogo pri pridobivanju znanja in izboljševanju zaposljivosti prostovoljca.
Volunteering plays an important role in gaining skills, and improving the employability of the volunteer.
Prostovoljci si pridobijo številne spretnosti in znanja.
Volunteers gain a very wide range of skills and competences.
Glede na zadnje sporočilo Komisije o spodbujanju polne udeležbe mladih v izobraževanju, zaposlovanju in družbi
According to the Commission in its most recent communication on promoting young peoples full participation in education, employment and society
KOM(2007)498 prostovoljne dejavnosti omogočajo koristno neformalno izkustveno učenje, ki mladim daje možnost, da pridobijo znanja, ki jim olajšajo prehod iz izobraževanja v zaposlitev.
COM(2007)498 , voluntary activities provide a valuable non formal learning experience which enables young people to acquire skills and facilitate their transition from education to employment.
Treba je opozoriti, da se prostovoljstvo, kljub temu da je pomemben instrument pri spodbujanju zaposljivosti, ne sme uporabljati kot alternativen ukrep zaposlovanja.
It is important to note that while volunteering is an important instrument to promote employability, it must not be exploited as an alternative employment measure.
Prostovoljstvo pomeni tudi vseživljenjsko učenje.
Volunteering is also a means of life long learning.
Preko prostovoljstva najbolj ogrožene skupine pridobijo moč za spremembo svojega življenja, se dejavno vključijo v družbo ter s pridobljenimi spretnostmi in znanjem dobijo dostop do bolje plačane zaposlitve ali se vrnejo k izobraževanju.
Through volunteering the most vulnerable groups in society are empowered to transform their lives, get actively involved in society and through acquired skills and competences, get access to better paid jobs or find a path back to education.
2) spodbujanjem socialne vključenosti
2) Promoting social inclusion
Kot priložnostno in neformalno izkustveno učenje prostovoljstvo ponuja dejanske možnosti tistim, ki so izključeni iz formalnega izobraževalnega sistema in so dolgotrajno brezposelni.
As an informal and non-formal learning experience volunteering offers real opportunities to those excluded from the formal education system and also the long term unemployed.
Razpoložljivi podatki raziskav kažejo, da je manj verjetno, da bodo ljudje, ki se ukvarjajo s prostovoljstvom, brezposelni
Available research data suggests that people who have been involved in volunteering are less likely to be unemployed.
Končno poročilo generalne skupščine Evropskega centra prostovoljcev, 23.3.2007 (Pariz, Francija) .
Final Report CEV General Assembly 23.03.07.
Ker skoraj eden od šestih mladih v EU prezgodaj opusti šolanje in eden od štirih mladih odraslih (v starosti od 25 do 29 let) ni dokončal srednje šole
(Paris, France) Given that nearly one- in- six young people in the EU are early school leavers and one- in- four young adults(ages 25-29) has not completed upper secondary education level,
KOM(2007)498 , se lahko znanja, ki jih pridobijo prostovoljci, izkažejo za izredno koristna pri dostopu do zaposlitve in spodbujanju socialne vključenosti.
COM(2007) 498 the skills obtained by volunteers can prove to be extremely valuable in accessing employment and promoting social inclusion.
Glede na poročilo univerze Johna Hopkinsa z naslovom „Measuring Civil Society and
The Economic Value of Volunteering
Volunteering“, ki je bilo objavljeno 25. septembra 2007
According to the John Hopkins University Report, 'Measuring Civil Society and
To pomeni, da v državah, ki so bile predmet študije, predstavlja 5–7 % BDP.
This means that it accounts for 5-7% of the GDP in the countries surveyed.
Te ugotovitve izhajajo iz podatkov, ki so jih zbrale uradne statistične agencije v osmih državah (v Avstraliji, Belgiji, Kanadi, Češki republiki, Franciji, na Japonskem, Novi Zelandiji in v Združenih državah).
These findings emerge from data generated by official statistical agencies in eight countries, (Australia, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, France, Japan, New Zealand and the United States).
Treba je omeniti, da se je 20 dodatnih razvitih držav in držav v razvoju obvezalo k uvedbi teh satelitskih računov, nekaj drugih držav pa bo v kratkem začelo z njihovim izvajanjem.
It is worth noting that twenty additional countries, both developed and developing, have committed to issuing these satellite accounts and a number of others are about to begin implementation.
To jasno kaže, da vse več držav prepoznava pomen vključevanja prostovoljstva v nacionalne račune.
This clearly indicates that more and more countries are recognising the importance of including volunteering in their National Accounts.
Prispevek prostovoljstva k družbeni koheziji
Contribution of Volunteering to Social Cohesion.
Prostovoljstvo ima pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju družbene kohezije.
Volunteering plays a major role in promoting social cohesion.
Na evropski ravni prostovoljstvo prenaša v prakso evropske vrednote, kot so solidarnost, družbena kohezija in vključenost.
At a European level volunteering translates European Values such as solidarity, social cohesion and inclusiveness into practice.
Prostovoljno udejstvovanje ljudem omogoča, da ponovno najdejo smisel in občutek za odgovornost ter si uredijo življenje.
Engagement in volunteering enables people to regain a sense of purpose and responsibility and structure in their lives.
Prostovoljstvo povečuje povezanost mladih ljudi s skupnostjo.
Volunteering across the generations.
Z zaupano odgovornostjo mladi dobijo priložnost, da naredijo nekaj zase.
Volunteering increases the connectedness of young people to their community By handing back responsibility to young people - it allows young people to do something for themselves..
Starejši prostovoljci lahko prispevajo s svojimi izkušnjami in strokovnim znanjem.
Older people who volunteer can make a contribution drawing on their experience and expertise.
Zaradi demografskih sprememb je prostovoljstvo starejših ogromen neizkoriščen vir v naših skupnostih.
Due to demographic changes, elder volunteering is a huge untapped resource residing in our communities.
Prostovoljstvo v ločenih družbah
Volunteering in divided societies.
Na Severnem Irskem so prostovoljci, ki so bili mnogokrat financirani iz programa Peace ali pobude Interreg, igrali ključno vlogo pri spravi in vzpostavitvi miru.
In Northern Ireland volunteers in many cases supported by PEACE or INTEREG funding have played a key role in reconciliation and peace building.
Prostovoljci iz različnih socialnih in političnih okolij ter z različnim verskim ozadjem so sodelovali pri konkretnih projektih in so s temi dejavnostmi pomagali ponovno vzpostaviti zaupanje med ločenimi skupnostmi.
Volunteers from different social and political traditions and religious backgrounds have worked together on concrete projects and through these activities have helped to rebuild bonds of trust between divided communities.
Podobno je bilo tudi na Cipru in v baltskih državah.
Similar outcomes have occurred in Cyprus and the Baltic States.
Prostovoljstvo lahko spodbuja vključevanje in medkulturni dialog
Volunteering can promote integration and intercultural dialogue.
Prostovoljstvo pospešuje vključevanje migrantov in državljanov tretjih držav v lokalne skupnosti.
Volunteering facilitates migrants and third country nationals to become involved in local communities.
Omogoča tudi medkulturni dialog in izmenjavo izkušenj ter je lahko instrument, s katerim mladi, ki so prostovoljci v tujini, pridobijo pozitivne izkušnje z raznolikostjo ter tako prispevajo k preprečevanju diskriminacije in predsodkov.
It also facilitates intercultural dialogue and exchange of experience and can also be an instrument whereby young people who volunteer abroad gain a positive experience of diversity and therefore contribute to the prevention of discrimination and prejudice.
Prostovoljci neposredno prispevajo h kulturnemu razvoju
Volunteers contribute directly to cultural development.
Prostovoljna dejavnost zagotavlja večje število priložnosti za kulturno izražanje in sodelovanje.
Voluntary activity ensures an increased number of opportunities for cultural expression and participation.
Končne opombe
Final Comment
Vloga Parlamenta je, da doda vrednost kvalitetnemu delu v državah članicah, kjer je to mogoče.
In the Parliament our role should be to add value where possible to the good work already underway in Member States.
Zagotoviti moramo spoštovanje politike Skupnosti, postopkov itd., da bi ustvarili sinergije, ki bodo zagotovile dodano vrednost.
We need to ensure that Community policies, procedures etc are observed to create the synergies that will give added value.
Spodbujati moramo razvoj civilne družbe in participativne demokracije, saj s tem omogočamo državljanom, da postanejo del tega procesa in posledično dajemo pravi pomen cilju približevanja Evrope njenim državljanom.
We should encourage the development of civil society and of participative democracy thereby facilitating citizens to become part of that process and consequently giving real meaning to the aim of bringing Europe closer to its citizens.
Spodbujanje, podpora in omogočanje prostovoljstva in prostovoljnega delovanja se bo, skupaj z rastjo družbenega kapitala, izkazalo za neprecenljivo orodje za doseganje takšnih rezultatov.
The promotion, support and facilitation of volunteering and voluntary action, accompanied by the growth of social capital will prove to be an invaluable tool in achieving those outcomes.
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Hans-Petra Martina
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................10
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................10
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Hans-Petra Martina, ki jo je 24. septembra 2007 posredoval stalni predstavnik Republike Avstrije, na plenarnem zasedanju pa je bila razglašena 27. septembra 2007,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin, forwarded by the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Austria on 24 September 2007, and announced in plenary sitting on 27 September 2007,
– po zagovoru Hans-Petra Martina, v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Hans-Peter Martin in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
Zadeva 101/63 Wagner proti Fohrmannu in Krieru [1964] ECR 383, in zadeva 149/85 Wybot proti Faureju in drugim [1986] ECR 2391. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– ob upoštevanju člena 57 avstrijskega zveznega ustavnega zakona,
– having regard to Article 57 of the Austrian Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz,
– ob upoštevanju člena 6(2) in člena 7 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0071/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0071/2008 ),
Dopis stalnega predstavnika vsebuje pismi avstrijskega zveznega ministrstva za pravosodje in dunajskega okrožnega kazenskega sodišča.
The letter from the Permanent Representative encloses a letter from the Austrian Federal Ministry for Justice and a letter from the Vienna Regional Criminal Court.
Medtem ko se pismo pravosodnega ministrstva nanaša na odvzem imunitete poslanca Martina v skladu s členom 10 protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah, se pismo okrožnega kazenskega sodišča nanaša na odvzem imunitete, ki se za poslance Evropskega parlamenta vzpostavi na podlagi člena 9 tega protokola.
Whereas the letter from the Ministry for Justice refers to waiver of Mr Hans-Peter Martin’s immunity under Article 10 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities, the letter from the Regional Criminal Court refers to waiving the immunity conferred on Members of the European Parliament by Article 9 of the Protocol.
Glede na to, da ni mogoče odvzeti imunitete, ki se vzpostavi na podlagi člena 9, je treba sklepati, da se zahteva za odvzem nanaša na člen 10.
Since the immunity conferred by Article 9 of the Protocol cannot be waived, it must be assumed that the request for waiver relates to Article 10.
Zasebni tožnik Merkur Treuhand Wirtschaftstreuhand- und Steuerberatungs GmbH meni, da te navedbe škodijo njegovemu poslovnemu ugledu, saj je ime Christopha Matznetterja – ta je bil več let partner in direktor uprave v podjetju, katerega pravni naslednik je tožnik – neločljivo povezano s tožnikom in sta torej v navedbah poslanca Martina tako Christoph Matznetter kot tožnik predstavljena kot strokovno nesposobna, kar po mnenju tožnika njegove stranke napeljuje na sklep, da zagotavlja slabe podporne in svetovalske storitve.
The private plaintiff, Merkur Treuhand Wirtschaftstreuhand- und Steuerberatungs Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, regards those claims as constituting commercial defamation, since the name Christoph Matznetter, who for years was a partner in, and managing director of, the plaintiff’s predecessor in law, is inextricably linked with the plaintiff and both Mr Matznetter and the plaintiff are held up to be professionally incompetent in Mr Martin’s remarks, which, according to the plaintiff, suggests to its clients that it provides poor support and consultancy services.
Zasebni tožnik navaja, da je ena od njegovih dolgoletnih strank zaradi tega že prekinila svojo pogodbo.
The private plaintiff states that a client of many years’ standing had already terminated its contract for that reason.
2008, SJ-0066/08. kazensko sodišče lahko izreklo tudi kazni, predvidene v členu 152 avstrijskega kazenskega zakonika, in sicer zaporno kazen do šestih mesecev ali denarno kazen.
Legal Opinion of 25.02.08, SJ-0066/08. , whereas the remedies sought by the complainant are publication of the judgment, taking down material from websites and the costs, the Criminal Court could still impose the penalties provided for in § 152 of the Austrian Criminal Code, namely a term of imprisonment of up to six months or fine.
Takšna sodba pa ne bi vplivala na mandat poslanca Martina, saj v skladu z zadevno avstrijsko zakonodajo poslanec Evropskega parlamenta izgubi mandat le, če je obsojen na zaporno kazen vsaj enega leta.
Such a sentence would, however, not affect Mr Martin’s mandate, since under the relevant Austrian legislation an MEP loses his seat only if he is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one year or more.
Hans-Peter Martin je bil obdolžen v skladu z naslednjimi določbami:
Mr Martin has been charged under the following provisions:
Avstrijski kazenski zakonik
Austrian Criminal Code:
Člen 152 (1) Kdor o kom trdi kaj neresničnega, kar lahko škoduje njegovemu ugledu, sredstvom preživljanja ali strokovnemu napredovanju, ali jih ogrozi, se kaznuje z zaporom do šestih mesecev ali z denarno kaznijo do višine 360 dnevnih plač.
(1) Any person making false assertions injurious to or endangering the reputation, livelihood or professional advancement of another person shall be liable to a term of imprisonment of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 days’ pay.
Zaporna in denarna kazen sta lahko izrečena hkrati.
A term of imprisonment and a fine may be imposed concurrently.
(2) Kršitelja se preganja le na zahtevo oškodovane stranke.
(2) An offender shall be prosecuted only at the request of the aggrieved party.
Člen 33 (1) Na podlagi zahteve tožnika se v sodbi o medijski kršitvi razsodi, da se umakne gradivo, ki je bilo namenjeno za razširjanje, ali izbriše spletno vsebino ali vsebine, ki predstavljajo kršitev.
(1) Upon application by the plaintiff, in a judgment on a media offence a ruling shall be made for withdrawal of the material intended to be circulated or for deletion of the website item or items which constitute the offence.
Enako velja za oprostitve v skladu s členom 29(3), ne da bi to posegalo v člen 446 zakona o kazenskem postopku.
Without prejudice to Section 446 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the same shall apply to acquittals under Section 29(3).
(2)Na podlagi zahteve tožnika ali osebe, ki je upravičena ukrepati, se sprejme razsodba o umiku v postopkih, katerih namen ni doseči obsodbo posameznika, če je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v določenem mediju prišlo do kršitve, vendar kazenski pregon določene osebe ni izvedljiv ali ni bil zahtevan ali za to ni bil začet postopek ali obsodba ni mogoča, ker je zaradi okoliščin kaznovanje izključeno.
(2) Upon application by the plaintiff or the person entitled to bring an action, a withdrawal ruling shall be made, in proceedings not seeking conviction of an individual if it has been established that, within a medium, an offence has been committed and prosecution of a specific person is not feasible, or has not been applied for or has not been maintained or a conviction is not possible because circumstances preclude punishment.
Če kršitelja ni mogoče kaznovati, tudi po tem, ko je bilo ugotovljeno dejansko stanje, se dokazi o tem dajo na voljo tudi lastniku medijske ustanove kot zainteresirani stranki, v skladu s členom 29 (člen 41(6)).
If the offender would not be punishable if the defence of justification were established, such evidence shall be made available to the media outlet owner, pursuant to Section 29, as an interested party (Section 41(6)).
(2a) Umik je nedopusten, če gre za posredovanje komentarja tretje strani v smislu oddelka 6(2)(4).
(2a) Withdrawal shall be inadmissible where, within the meaning of Section 6(2)(4), a comment by a third party has been reproduced.
(3) Pravica stranke, ki je upravičena do sprožitve zasebnega sodnega pregona, da zaprosi za umik v postopku, katerega namen ni obsodba posameznika, zastara po šestih tednih od dne, ko se je stranka seznanila s kršitvijo in z dejstvom, da za to ni mogoče sodno preganjati in obsoditi nobenega določenega posameznika.
(3) The right of the party entitled to bring a private prosecution to apply for withdrawal in proceedings not seeking conviction of an individual shall lapse after a period of six weeks from the day on which the party has become aware of the offence and of the fact that no specific individual can be prosecuted or convicted.
(4) Namesto umika se lastnika medijske ustanove na njegovo zahtevo pozove, naj v ustreznem roku zagotovi – bodisi s skrajšanjem ali prekritjem besedila bodisi na kakršen koli drugačen način – da se v primeru nadaljnjega razširjanja gradiva, vsebina ali vsebine, ki predstavljajo kršitev, ne posredujejo več.
(4) Instead of withdrawal, the media outlet owner shall be directed, at his request, to ensure within an appropriate period – either through abridgement or by masking text or in any other appropriate manner – that, should the material continue to be circulated, the item or items constituting the offence are no longer communicated.
(5) Če se razsodi za umik v postopku, katerega namen ni obsodba posameznika, stroške tega postopka nosi lastnik medijske ustanove.
(5) If a ruling is made for withdrawal in proceedings not seeking conviction or an individual, the costs of those proceedings shall be borne by the media outlet owner.
Objava sodb
Publication of judgments
Deli sodbe, ki jih je treba objaviti, se navedejo v sodbi.
The parts of the judgment to be published shall be cited in the judgment itself.
V zvezi s tem lahko sodišče skrajša dele sodbe, v kolikor je to potrebno, da bi bila njena vsebina lažje razumljiva, ali da bi omejilo obseg besedila, ki ga je treba objaviti.
In this connection, the court may abridge parts of the judgment in so far as this appears necessary for easier comprehension of the substance of the judgment or for limiting the volume of text to be published.
(2) V primeru obrekovanja ali podobnega kaznivega dejanja, ki škoduje ugledu nekoga, ali kjer je drugo kaznivo dejanje povezano z okoliščinami ali dejstvi, povezanimi z zasebnim ali družinskim življenjem nekoga, se lahko razsodba o objavi sodbe sprejme le ob pristanku oškodovane strani, četudi se za sodni pregon tega kaznivega dejanja ne zahteva privolitev ali je ta že bila dana.
(2) In the case of defamation or a similar offence injuring a person’s reputation, or where another punishable offence relates to circumstances or facts in connection with a person’s private or family life, a ruling to publish a judgment may be made only with the consent of the aggrieved party, even where, in order to prosecute the offence concerned, authorisation is not required or has already been given.
(3) Na prošnjo tožnika ali strani, ki je upravičena sprožiti sodni pregon, se sprejme razsodba o objavi sodbe v postopkih, katerih namen ni obsodba posameznika, če je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo v medijski ustanovi storjeno kaznivo dejanje, vendar kazenski pregon določene osebe ni izvedljiv ali ni bil zahtevan ali za to ni bil začet postopek ali obsodba ni mogoča, ker okoliščine preprečujejo kaznovanje.
(3) Upon application by the plaintiff or the party entitled to bring a prosecution, a ruling shall be made to publish the judgment in proceedings not seeking conviction of an individual, if it has been established that, within a medium, an offence has been committed and prosecution of a specific person is not feasible or has not been applied for or has not been maintained or a conviction is not possible because circumstances preclude punishment.
Uporabi se člen 33(2), drugi stavek, in (3).
Section 33(2), second sentence, and (3) shall apply.
(3a) Objava sodbe je nedopustna, če gre za posredovanje komentarja tretje strani v smislu člena 6(2)(4).
(3a) Publication of a judgment shall be inadmissible where within the meaning of Section 6(2)(4), a comment by a third party has been reproduced.
(4) Če je bilo storjeno medijsko kaznivo dejanje v periodični publikaciji, se sodba v skladu s členom 13 ustrezno objavi v tem mediju; rok za objavo se začne takoj, ko je sodba pravnomočna in so bile stranke o njej obveščene.
(4) If a media offence has been committed within a periodical medium or media publication, the judgment shall be published pursuant to Section 13, mutatis mutandis, in that medium; the publication period shall commence as soon as the judgment has become unappealable and has been notified.
Kar zadeva izvršitev se ustrezno uporablja člen 20.
As regards enforcement, Section 20 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
(5) Sprejme se razsodba o objavi sodbe v drugi periodični publikaciji, če periodična publikacija, v kateri je bilo storjeno medijsko kaznivo dejanje, ne obstaja več ali če je bilo kaznivo dejanje storjeno v neperiodičnem ali tujem mediju ali medijski publikaciji.
(5) A ruling shall be made for publication within another periodical medium or media publication if the periodical medium or media publication in which the media offence was committed no longer exists or if the offence was committed in a non-periodical or foreign medium or media publication.
Stroški objave sodbe se vključijo v stroške postopka.
The cost of publishing judgments shall be included in the costs of the proceedings.
Kar zadeva izvršitev se uporablja člen 46.
As regards enforcement, Section 46 shall apply.
(6) Če se naloži objava sodbe v postopkih, katerih namen ni obsodba posameznika, stroške postopka krije lastnik medijske ustanove (izdajatelj).
(6) If a ruling is made for publication of a judgment in proceedings not seeking conviction of an individual, the cost of those proceedings shall be borne by the media outlet owner (publisher).
Uporabljajo se naslednje določbe, ki se nanašajo na parlamentarno imuniteto:
The following provisions relating to parliamentary immunity are relevant:
Protokol o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti
Protocol on privileges and immunities of the European Communities
Med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi člani:
During the sessions of the European Parliament, its members shall enjoy:
(a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane članom parlamenta te države;
(a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;