natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Inovacije v širšem smislu so tako v lizbonski strategiji kot v kohezijski politiki opredeljene kot glavni instrument za spodbujanje razvoja evropskega ozemlja in krepitev konkurenčne sposobnosti EU ob izzivih globaliziranega sveta.
Both the Lisbon Strategy and the cohesion policy have identified in innovation in its broader sense the main instrument to foster the development of the European territory and potentiate its competitive capacity against the challenges coming from a globalised world.
Posledično so inovacije zavzele osrednje mesto v obeh, njihova strateška vloga pa je dobila tako velik poudarek, kot še nikoli poprej.
As a consequence innovation has been put at the centre of both of them and its strategic role has been emphasised as never before.
Strateške smernice Skupnosti za obdobje 2007–2013 državam EU15 nalagajo uradno obveznost (in državam EU12 priporočilo), da za uresničitev lizbonskih ciljev namenijo vsaj 60 % programskih sredstev v konvergenčnih regijah in 75 % sredstev v regij regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja.
The Community Strategic Guidelines for the period 2007-2013 set a formal requirement for the EU15 (and a recommendation for the EU12) to earmark at least 60% of the Programme allocations in the Convergence regions and 75% in the Competitiveness and Employment regions to the delivery of the Lisbon objectives.
Že v obdobju 2000–2006 je bilo v raziskovalne dejavnosti in inovacije vloženih med 5,5 % in 7,4 % izdatkov strukturnih skladov (skupaj 10,2 milijarde EUR), čeprav tedaj še ni bilo uradne zahteve za dodelitev sredstev.
Actually already in the 2000-2006 period, when no formal earmarking requirement was in place, between 5.5% and 7.4% of all Structural Fund expenditure (€10.2 billion in total) was invested in research and innovation activities.
Doslej razpoložljive naknadne ocene kažejo, da je bila uporaba regionalnih programov za doseganje lizbonskih ciljev bolj izražena v sorazmerno bogatejših regijah in bolj omejena v najmanj razvitih regijah, kjer so bili programi večinoma osredotočeni na osnovno infrastrukturo.
The ex post evaluations available so far highlight that the use of regional programmes to achieve the Lisbon objectives was more evident for the relatively more prosperous regions and more limited for the last developed ones, where the programmes tended to emphasise rather basic infrastructure.
Seveda na vseh področjih ni mogoče uporabiti enotne strategije; kljub temu pa so posebnosti posameznih regij, torej njihova ozemeljska razsežnost, močno vplivale na učinkovitost izvedenih ukrepov.
Obviously no one-size-fits to-all strategy can be applied to all areas; contrariwise specificities of different regions - their territorial dimension - had a great impact on the effectiveness of the implemented measures.
Vključitev regionalnih in lokalnih organov oblasti ne le v izvajanje programov, ampak tudi v samo zasnovo je torej bistvena, saj prav ti akterji najbolje poznajo potrebe svojega območja.
The involvement of regional and local authorities in the design besides than in the implementation of programmes becomes therefore essential as these are the actors best aware of the needs of their respective territory.
Iz analize uporabe programskih sredstev za obdobje 2007–2013 je razvidno, da je namensko dodeljevanje nekoliko preseglo določene pragove.
From the analysis of the Programme allocations for 2007-2013 it results that the earmarking has sensitively overcome the established thresholds.
Za uresničevanje prednostnih ciljev lizbonske strategije je bilo v konvergenčnih regijah namenjenih 65 % sredstev, v regijah iz cilja „konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje“ pa 82 % sredstev.
In particular in the Convergence objective 65% and in Competitiveness regions 82%of the funds have been earmarked to Lisbon-related priorities.
Ti deleži, ki v sedemletnem obdobju skupaj znašajo okrog 228 milijard EUR, veljajo za 27 držav članic EU in kažejo, da so se države EU12 resno zavezale k ustreznemu dodeljevanju sredstev.
These percentages, which together make up a total allocation of approx. €228 billion over the 7-years period, refer to the EU27, showing that also EU12 have seriously committed themselves in the earmarking exercise.
Seveda pa je bilo pričakovati, da bodo v dodelitvah številne razlike tako med državami članicami kot med cilji.
Predictably enough, the allocation varies significantly across Member States and among Objectives.
Zlasti v regijah iz cilja „konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje“ je program močno osredotočen na lizbonske cilje in velik poudarek posvečen inovacijam, znanju in tehnologiji, v konvergenčnih programih pa so prednostne naloge povezane bolj z zaposlovanjem in kažejo, da je reforma sistema izobraževanja in usposabljanja tu ocenjena kot predpogoj za nadaljnji razvoj.
In particular in Competitiveness regions the programming is strongly Lisbon-related with emphasis put on innovation, knowledge and technology, whereas in Convergence programmes the priorities linked to employment are rather privileged showing that a reform of the education and training system here considered as a pre-requisite for further development.
Prvo strateško poročilo z analizo rezultatov uresničevanja teh prednostnih nalog z ustreznimi izdatki po državah članicah v prvih 18 mesecih programa bo Komisija sprejela najkasneje 1. aprila 2010.
A first Strategic report, analysing the results of implementation by the Member States in achieving these priorities through spending in the first 18 months of Programme implementation shall be adopted by the Commission by 1 April 2010 at the latest.
V njem je treba natančno oceniti, v kolikšni meri se te obveznosti odražajo v dejanskih izdatkih na ravni projektov.
What needs to be thoroughly assessed in fact is at which extent these engagements are reflected in terms of actual expenditure at project level.
Žal se zaradi poznejšega zagona programov in posledičnega pomanjkanja podatkov o izdatkih trenutno te usklajenosti ne da preveriti.
Unfortunately due to the delayed start up of the programmes and the subsequent lack of data on expenditure, this correspondence cannot be verified at this stage.
Strateško poročilo Komisije bo, čeprav bo pokrivalo zgolj omejeno obdobje, v tem smislu torej ključni dokument, na podlagi katerega bo potekala medinstitucionalna razprava na visoki ravni, v okviru katere bo opravljena ocena ravni in vrste prispevka strukturnih skladov k uresničevanju lizbonskih ciljev, in ki bo institucije EU in nacionalne institucije, regionalne interesne skupine in civilno družbo spodbudil k premisleku o obliki in vsebini strategije za rast in delovna mesta po letu 2010, imenovane. strategija EU2020.
The Strategic report of the Commission will therefore represent a key document in this sense, despite the limited period covered, on which basis a high level inter-institutional debate will be carried out to assess the level and type of contribution of the Structural Funds to the Lisbon objectives and pave the way to a serious reflection among EU and national institutions, regional stakeholders and the civil society on the shape and contents of the strategy for growth and jobs after 2010, the so called EU2020 Strategy.
Še pomembneje je, da se dolgoročno oceni, kakšen učinek so v državah članicah in regijah imele naložbe, povezane z lizbonskimi cilji in izvedene prek strukturnih skladov.
Even more crucial is to be able to assess in the long term which impact the Lisbon-related investments done through the Structural Funds has actually produced in the Member States and regions.
Če rezultati tega ocenjevanja ne bodo znani, bodo vsi pogovori o prihodnosti neučinkoviti.
Any discussion on the future will not be effective if the results of this assessment are not known.
Čeprav tovrstni podatki zaradi zgodnje stopnje izvajanja programa še niso na voljo, je pomembno pripraviti teren in Komisijo ozavestiti, da je treba nujno razviti instrumente, ki bodo omogočili takšno analizo, npr. usklajene kazalnike, ki jih bo mogoče skozi celotno obdobje povezovati in primerjati med programi in državami članicami, da se preverijo doseženi učinki in opravijo morebitne prilagoditve.
Although these data are not available yet due to the early stage of Programme implementation, it is essential to pave the way and sensitize the Commission on the need to urgently develop the instruments allowing for such analysis, i.e. homogeneous indicators, which can be aggregated and compared across Programmes and Member States during the whole period in order to verify the impacts produced and make the necessary adjustments.
Vloga kohezijske politike v strategiji EU2020
The role of cohesion policy in the EU2020 Strategy
Graditi prihodnost pomeni analizirati preteklost, da bi še povečali dosežene rezultate, unovčili izkušnje in se izognili starim napakam.
Building the future implies analysing the past in order to maximise achieved results, capitalise experiences and avoiding old mistakes.
Zato je pri oblikovanju nove strategije EU2020, ki naj bi se soočila z izzivi prihodnjih desetih let, potreben temeljit premislek o povezavi med kohezijsko politiko in lizbonsko strategijo.
A deep reflection on the relation between cohesion policy and Lisbon Strategy is therefore needed when building the new EU2020 Strategy, which is meant to tackle the challenges of the next ten years.
Kohezijska politika lahko dejansko bolje kot katere koli druge politike uspešno spodbudi naložbe za rast in nova delovna mesta; izkazalo se je tudi, da se ob ustrezni uporabi načela partnerstva in vključitvi lokalnih akterjev kot nosilcev izvajanja prednostnih nalog vzpostavi okrepljen občutek zavezanosti ciljem politik in njenim dosežkom.
The cohesion policy can in fact better than other policies succeed in mobilising investments for growth and jobs; it has also proved that when the partnership principle is correctly applied and regional and local actors are made protagonists of the implementation of priorities a greater sense of ownership towards policies objectives and outputs is engendered.
Predlog Komisije za strategijo EU2020 priznava, da je kohezijska politika ključna politika za uresničitev ciljev EU2020.
The Commission proposal for the EU2020 Strategy recognises the cohesion policy as key policy to deliver the EU2020 goals.
Toda zdi se, da v njem vidi bolj vir stabilnih finančnih sredstev kot pa pomembno referenčno točko, tako zaradi izvajanja načel partnerstva, celostnega pristopa, upravljanja na več ravneh, kot zaradi sposobnosti vključitve regionalnih in lokalnih akterjev.
It seems, however, to consider it more as the source of stable financial allocations than a major reference due to the application of principles such as partnership, integrated approach, multilevel governance as well as for its capacity to mobilise regional and local actors.
Če se ta načela, ki predstavljajo pomemben prispevek kohezijske politike k uspešnemu uresničevanju strategije EU2020, ustrezno ne vključijo v strategijo, je lahko ogrožena celo njena uspešnost.
If these principles, which represent a major contribution of the cohesion policy towards the successful implementation of the EU2020 Strategy, are not duly integrated into it, the successfulness of the Strategy itself can be endangered.
V poročilu so predstavljena nekatera konkretna priporočila, da se zagotovi ustrezno upoštevanje te povezave:
Some concrete recommendations are put forward in the report to ensure that this linkage is duly taken into account:
· Prednostne naloge, ki so opredeljene v strategiji EU2020, morajo biti natančno usklajene s prednostnimi nalogami prihodnje kohezijske politike: potreben je večji poudarek na temeljnih prednostnih nalogah in več dopolnjevanja med njimi, pri čemer pa je treba zagotoviti tudi potrebno prožnost, da se zadostijo regionalne posebnosti.
· the priorities identified in the EU2020 Strategy should be strictly aligned with those of the future cohesion policy: more concentration on core priorities and enhanced complementarities between them are needed, while ensuring the necessary flexibility to accommodate regional specificities.
· Razviti je treba sinergije med nacionalnimi strateškimi referenčnimi okviri in nacionalnimi programi reform ter bolje izkoristiti njihove možnosti tudi prek boljšega usklajevanja na ravni EU, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, da se okrepi upravljanje.
· synergies between the National Strategic Reference Frameworks and the National Reform Programmes should be developed and their potential better exploited also through better administrative coordination at EU, national, regional and local level in order to increase governance.
· Cilji EU2020 morajo biti opredeljeni na ravni Skupnosti, vendar je treba v njihovo izvajanje in vključitev v nacionalne politike v prihodnje vključiti več podnacionalnih organov oblasti.
· The EU2020 objectives must be defined at Community level but their implementation and adaptation into national policies should involve more the sub-national authorities in the future.
Med doslej splošno priznanimi šibkostmi lizbonske strategije izstopata šibko upravljanje na več ravneh ter nezadostna vključitev lokalnih in regionalnih organov oblasti v uresničevanje njenih ciljev, čeprav kar dve tretjini naložb javnega sektorja prihajata z regionalne in lokalne ravni in imajo ti organi pogosto največ pristojnosti na tem področju.
One of the limits broadly recognised so far to the Lisbon Strategy is the weak multi-level governance and the insufficient involvement of local and regional authorities in the implementation of its objectives, despite the fact that 2/3 of the public sector investment comes from the regional and local level and that these authorities often concentrate substantial policy competences.
Nove določbe Lizbonske pogodbe, ki priznava podnacionalno razsežnost subsidiarnosti, zahtevajo, da se v prihodnji strategiji upošteva tudi regionalno razsežnost.
The consideration of the regional dimension in the future Strategy is also required in application to the new provisions of the Lisbon Treaty, which recognises the sub-national dimension of subsidiarity.
S pristopom od spodaj navzgor bo mogoče zagotoviti dejansko zavezanost strategiji in njeno dolgoročno trajnost.
A bottom-up approach will be able to ensure an actual ownership of the Strategy and its sustainability in the long term.
Upravljanje na več ravneh je treba obravnavati tako z vidika vertikalne kot horizontalne razsežnosti, kar pomeni, da je treba razvijati odnose med gospodarskimi in družbenimi akterji na isti ravni.
Multi-level governance needs to be considered not only in its vertical but also in its horizontal dimension, developing relations between economic and social actors of the same level.
· Pri izvajanju prihodnje strategije je treba v celoti upoštevati načelo partnerstva.
· The partnership principle should be fully implemented in the delivery of the future Strategy.
Takšna sprememba pristopa bi lahko zagotovila boljše informiranje o ciljih in dosežkih strategije v civilni družbi, saj je prav pomanjkanje komunikacije ena od največjih slabosti lizbonske strategije.
Such a change in the approach would have the advantage of ensuring a better communication of the Strategy objectives and outputs in the civil society, whose current lack proves to be one of the big weaknesses of the Lisbon Strategy.
· Čeprav Lizbonska pogodba ozemeljsko kohezijo priznava kot cilj Skupnosti, pa je ozemeljska razsežnost v predlogu Komisije preslabo zastopana, kar lahko privede do nevarnosti sektorske delitve politike.
· Although territorial cohesion has been recognised as Community objective by the Lisbon Treaty, the territorial dimension is much too poorly present in the Commission proposal, which may lead to a risk of policy sectorization.
Nasprotno pa je mogoče učinkovite rezultate doseči le s celovitim pristopom in vključitvijo regionalne razsežnosti v strategijo.
On the contrary only an integrated approach through the inclusion of the regional dimension in the Strategy will bring effective results.
V prihodnje je treba okrepiti zlasti sinergije med instrumenti EU za spodbujanje inovacij (strukturni skladi, okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije ter 7. okvirni program) in uskladiti dolžino trajanja teh programov.
In particular synergies between the EU instruments fostering innovation (Structural Funds, CIP, and VII Framework Programme) should be enhanced and the multi-annual programming duration of these instruments kept aligned in the future.
· Zagotoviti je treba ustrezno financiranje kohezijske politike, ki mora zajemati celotno območje Evropske unije, da bi lahko ustrezno podprli uresničevanje nove strategije.
· adequate funding should be ensured to a cohesion policy which must cover the whole territory of the European Union in order to allow effective support in the delivery of the new Strategy;
· Prihodnji regulativni okvir kohezijske politike je treba poenostaviti, da se zmanjša trenutna raven napak in da se zlasti zasebnim partnerjem olajša sodelovanje v projektih.
· the future regulatory framework of the cohesion policy needs to be simplified to reduce the current level of error and facilitate participation in projects especially by the private partners.
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Haralampos Angurakis (Charalampos Angourakis), Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis (Georgios Stavrakakis), Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Mihailis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Viktor Uspaskich, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Charalampos Angourakis, Jean-Paul Besset, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Seán Kelly, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Michail Tremopoulos, Viktor Uspaskich, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller
o kaznih, določenih za resne kršitve socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu
on penalties for serious infringements against the social rules in road transport
Poročevalka: Hella Ranner
Rapporteur: Hella Ranner
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o analizi kazni, določenih za resne kršitve socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu v skladu z zakonodajo držav članic ( KOM(2009)0225 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission analysing the penalties for serious infringements against the social rules in road transport, as provided for in the legislation of the Member States ( COM(2009)0225 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7-0130/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0130/2010 ),
A. ker je Evropska unija v zadnjih letih s sprejetjem Uredbe (EGS) št. 3821/85 in Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 ter Direktive 2006/22/ES vzpostavila sistem socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu, da bi povečala varnost v cestnem prometu in zagotovila pošteno konkurenco,
A. whereas in recent years the European Union has created a system of social rules in road transport by adopting Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 and Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, together with Directive 2006/22/EC, in order to increase safety on the roads and to ensure fair competition,
B. ker so kazenski sistemi v državah članicah Evropske unije nastajali skozi zgodovino in se zato med seboj zelo razlikujejo, pri čemer so lahko kazni v posamezni državi v skrajnih primerih tudi desetkrat višje kakor v drugi državi,
B. whereas the penalty systems in the Member States of the European Union have evolved historically, and therefore show wide disparities, with fines in extreme cases that can be as much as ten times higher in one country than in another,
C. ker so pravni elementi pri mednarodnem prevozu postali težko pregledni za podjetnike in zlasti za voznike in ker se države članice srečujejo z velikimi izzivi pri izvajanju ureditev, sedanje stanje pa ni združljivo z notranjim trgom,
C. whereas the legal position with regard to international transport operations has become very hard for undertakings and especially for drivers to understand; whereas the Member States face major challenges in transposing the regulations as required and whereas the current situation is not compatible with the single market,
D. ker je zaskrbljen zaradi poročil o pomanjkljivostih, ki vplivajo na digitalne tahografe in zaradi katerih je z njimi enostavno manipulirati,
D. concerned at the reports of shortcomings affecting digital tachographs which make them highly vulnerable to tampering,
3. zato poziva Komisijo, naj že leta 2010 predloži posodobljeno in celovito poročilo o izvajanju nove priloge III k Direktivi 2006/22/ES;
Calls therefore on the Commission to submit an updated and complete report on the implementation of the new Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC before the end of 2010;
5. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj naredijo vse, kar je v njihovi moči, za zagotovitev hitrejše izpolnitve ciljev iz člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006, da bodo za prihodnje ukrepe usklajevanja na voljo novejši statistični podatki;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to do their utmost to ensure that the objectives set out in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 are fulfilled more quickly, so that more recent statistics are available for future harmonisation measures;
Velike razlike med državami članicami
Significant differences between Member States
10. obžaluje, da nekatere države članice ne poznajo razlikovanja kazni glede na resnost kršitve; poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo nacionalne predpise, ki bodo imeli dejanski, sorazmeren in odvračilen učinek in bodo upoštevali resnost kršitve;
Regrets that some Member States do not provide for differentiation of penalties according to the seriousness of the infringement; calls on the Member States to adopt national legislation that has an effective, proportionate and dissuasive effect and that takes due account of how serious an infringement is;
Nadaljnje usklajevanje
Further harmonisation
Nadzorni organi morajo to razlago upoštevati;
The inspection bodies should take this interpretation into account;
14. poudarja, da je treba novo prilogo III k Direktivi 2006/22/ES, uvedeno z Direktivo Komisije 2009/5/ES, obravnavati kot temelj enotnega pristopa k razvrstitvi kršitev socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu v skladu z zakonodajo držav članic; odločno poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo potrebne pravne in upravne predpise za hiter prenos Direktive Komisije 2009/5/ES v zakonodajo;
Points out that the new Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC introduced by Commission Directive 2009/5/EC should be evaluated as the foundation for a uniform approach to categorising infringements against the social rules in road transport as laid down in the legislation of the Member States; urges the Member States to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary for rapid transposition of Commission Directive 2009/5/EC;
16. pozdravlja, da je Komisija v skladu s členom 22(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 pripravila „smernice“ kot pomoč posameznim državam članicam pri razlagi in uporabi te uredbe; vseeno ugotavlja, da te smernice niso pravno zavezujoče, zato niso dosegle svojega namena – enotnega izvajanja v državah članicah;
Welcomes the fact that pursuant to Article 22(4) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 the Commission has prepared 'guidelines' to support the Member States in the national interpretation and application of this Regulation; notes, however, that the guidelines are not legally binding and have therefore not achieved their aim of uniform transposition in the Member States;