natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V zvezi s tem zagovarja večjo neodvisnost in večja pooblastila za regulatorje, zahteve po večji preglednosti na trgu, izboljšan okvir za sodelovanje na evropski ravni med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in upravljavci prenosnega sistema, več pozornosti nadaljnjemu razvijanju zmogljivosti medsebojnega povezovanja med državami članicami in predlogu o ločevanju lastništva kot najučinkovitejši, vendar ne edini način, da se spodbujajo vlaganja in prepreči diskriminacija za nove udeležence.
In this sense, he agrees with the inclusion of stronger and more independent powers for the regulators, the increased requirements for transparency in the market, the improved framework for cooperation at European level between national regulators as well as between Transmission Systems Operators, the emphasis given to the further development of interconnection capacity between Member States and the proposal of ownership unbundling as the most effective, but not the only, mean to encourage investments and avoid discrimination towards new entrants.
Poročevalec se prav tako zavzema za predlagano vzpostavitev agencije evropskih regulativnih organov, kljub temu da izraža pomisleke o njeni sedanji strukturi in pristojnosti za odločanje.
He also shares the proposed creation of an Agency of European Regulators although he has reservations on the present structure and decision-making power of this new body.
Glede uredbe o čezmejni izmenjavi električne energije poročevalec meni, da je glavni problem zakonodajnega predloga trenutna delitev pristojnosti med različnimi akterji, kar vodi v nejasen in okoren postopek odločanja.
Regarding the Regulation on the electricity cross-border exchanges, the Rapporteur thinks that the main problem with the legislative proposal lies in the current division of competences between the different actors which leads to a confused and somehow cumbersome decision-making process.
V tem dokumentu bo poročevalec predstavil glavne pomisleke glede tega posebnega predloga.
This document will highlight the main concerns of the Rapporteur with regards to this particular proposal.
Struktura odgovornosti
Structure of responsibilities
Kot že uvodoma omenjeno, poročevalec meni, da je ključna težava predmetne zadeve v trenutni strukturi pristojnosti, ki jo predstavlja predlog uredbe Komisije o čezmejni izmenjavi električne energije in ni v skladu z dejansko in običajno delitvijo pristojnosti na nacionalni ravni, saj se upravljavcem prenosnih omrežij podeljuje status, podoben regulativnemu organu, medtem ko bi se naj regulativna agencija omejila na vlogo svetovalnega organa.
As stated above, the Rapporteur considers that the key problem in this dossier is that the current structure of responsibilities presented in the Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on the electricity cross-border exchanges does not correspond to the actual and natural division of competences at national level as the Transmission System Operators are given a quasi-regulatory status while the Regulatory Agency seems to be reduced to the role of an advisory body.
Poročevalec zlasti meni, da bi morale biti nekatere izmed enajstih nalog, ki jih izvajajo upravljavci prenosnih omrežij, v pristojnosti regulativnih organov.
In particular, he believes that several of the eleven tasks that Transmission System Operators (TSOs) have to fulfil should be in the hands of the regulatory authorities instead.
Seveda poročevalec podpira predlog Komisije, da se za razvoj tehničnega kodeksa vzpostavi pristop od spodaj navzgor, saj so za to najprimernejši upravljavci prenosnih omrežij in imajo neposreden interes, da se na evropski ravni takšna pravila poenostavijo in uskladijo, vendar meni, da morajo drugi kodeksi, kot sta na primer kodeksa o trgovanju in preglednosti trga, slediti drugemu pristopu, kjer je agencija kot neodvisni organ v tesnem sodelovanju z udeleženci na trgu in, seveda ni treba posebej poudarjati, upravljavci prenosnih omrežij pristojna za oblikovanje smernic ter za njihovo sprejemanje.
Indeed, while the Rapporteur shares the Commission’s idea of establishing a bottom-up approach in what regards the development of technical codes since the TSOs are best suited to do so and have a direct interest in simplifying and harmonising such rules at European level, he believes that other codes such as those relating to trading and market transparency should follow a different approach where the Agency, as an independent authority, should be responsible for drafting the guidelines in close cooperation with market participants and, needless to say, TSOs, and for adopting them.
Ker izvajanje zgoraj navedenih kodeksov in pravil temelji na prostovoljni osnovi, se nadalje pojavlja vprašanje po dodatni koristi za trenutno obstoječi sistem sodelovanja med upravljavci prenosnih omrežij na evropski ravni.
Furthermore, the voluntary nature of the implementation of the above mentioned codes and rules raises some questions as to whether there is any added value to the current system of TSO cooperation at European level.
Poročevalec je trdno prepričan, da bi nekatera pravila in kodeksi, ki bodo izhajali iz izvajanja te uredbe, morala biti obvezujoča.
The Rapporteur firmly believes that some rules and codes that will derive from the implementation of this Regulation should have a compulsory nature.
Poleg tega poročevalec meni, da bi v skladu s pooblastili nalog agencije, ki je pristojna za izdelavo ter sprejetje tržnih kodeksov, in glede na prakso izvajanja na nacionalni ravni regulativni organ moral biti pristojen za posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi namesto upravljavcev prenosnih omrežij.
Finally, the Rapporteur thinks that, in line with the attribution to the Agency of drafting and adopting market codes, this regulatory authority should be in charge of carrying out the stakeholder consultation instead of the TSOs, according to the process carried out at national level.
Poročevalcu so omejitve pristojnosti agencije evropskih regulatorjev, ki jih je podala pravna služba Komisije, znane.
The Rapporteur is aware of the limitations the Commission’s legal service opinion has placed on the powers given to the Agency of European Regulators.
Vendar je prepričan, da večina negotovosti in nejasnosti glede strukture pristojnosti izhaja ravno zaradi pomanjkanja pristojnosti.
However, he is of the opinion that most of the uncertainties and confusion in the structure of powers derives precisely from this lack of competences.
Zaradi tega poročevalec izraža željo, da odbor zaprosi pravno službo Parlamenta, naj preuči, ali je možna razširitev pristojnosti agencije na tak način, da bo v skladu z resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta junija 2007 o liberalizaciji energetskih trgov lahko podala končne regulativne odločitve.
For this reason, the Rapporteur would like the Committee to ask the Parliament’s legal service to study whether the Agency’s powers could be extended to be able to deliver final regulatory decisions, in accordance with the European Parliament’s resolution of June 2007 on the liberalisation of the energy markets.
V primeru, da to ne bo možno, poročevalec meni, naj Parlament razmisli, če bi predstavljen model morebiti rešil trenutne težave med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi za dosego skupnega stališča in če bi lahko služil kot vmesni korak na poti do dejanskega evropskega regulativnega organa.
Should that not be possible, then the Rapporteur believes that Parliament should reflect on whether the proposed model would answer the problems to reach a common view that arise at present between national regulators and if it could be acceptable as an intermediary step towards a true European Regulator.
Evropski parlament je nedavno izrazil željo, da se vzpostavi evropski organ nacionalnih regulativnih organov, ki bi imel pristojnost za odločanje pri čezmejnih vprašanjih med državami članicami, medtem ko bi nacionalni regulativni organi ostali pristojni za odločanje pri zadevah na svojem ozemlju.
The European Parliament expressed in the recent past its wish to establish a European body of national regulators that would be granted decision-making powers for cross-border issues between Member States while the national regulators would remain responsible for decisions of matters within their national territory.
S svojim stališčem je Parlament nameraval prekiniti trenutno prevladujoče mirovanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi; zaradi tega obstoječi predlog Komisije podeljuje agenciji pooblastila, da reši trenutne in morebitne težave.
The Parliament's position intended to put an end to the situations of deadlock between national regulators we see at the present time; that is why the Commission's proposal as it stands today does give the Agency the competence of solving this current and potential difficulties.
Poročevalec meni, da bi neodvisna agencija z ustreznimi pristojnostmi za čezmejne zadeve spodbudila, da se učinkoviteje in bolj pregledno razvije resnično reguliranje evropskega energetskega trga.
The Rapporteur believes that an independent Agency, with the adequate competences for cross border issues, would promote the development of a true EU energy regulation, more efficiently and with more transparency.
Poročevalec izraža pomisleke glede razpustitve obstoječega evropskega regulativnega organa na področju elektrike in plina (ERGEG) in posledic, ki jih razpustitev lahko ima na neodvisnost, saj bo agencija, kot je predlagano, močno odvisna od Evropske komisije.
The Rapporteur is also concerned by the dissolution of the existing ERGEG and the implications it might have in terms of independence since the Agency as currently proposed will be excessively dependent on the European Commission.
Pravila o ločevanju v okviru evropskega omrežja upravljavcev prenosnega omrežja
Unbundling requirements under the European Network of Transmission System Operators
Poročevalec pozdravlja predlog Komisije o formalizaciji obstoječega okvira sodelovanja med upravljavci prenosnih omrežij, kar bo spodbudilo vključevanje na evropski ravni in polno usklajevanje tehničnih pravil med 27 državami članicami.
The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s proposal to formalise the existing cooperation framework of Transmission System Operators so as to promote integration at European level and to develop full harmonisation of technical rules between the 27 Member States.
Za ustrezno delovanje evropskega omrežja upravljavcev prenosnega omrežja in ne glede na stopnjo ločevanja, ki jo zahteva država članica (to pomeni ločene upravljavce prenosnega omrežja ali neodvisne upravljavce), poročevalec meni, da je treba vsakega člana evropskega omrežja upravljavcev prenosnega omrežja obravnavati enakovredno glede na svoje obveznosti kot upravljavec omrežja in zagotavljanje nediskriminacijskega pristopa do omrežja.
In order to make the ENTSO model work properly, and regardless of the level of unbundling required in each Member State – that is, unbundled TSO or ISO -, the Rapporteur believes that every Transmission System Operator within ENTSO should be treated equally in what concerns their obligations as system operator and in ensuring non-discriminatory access to the grid.
Vsekakor je pomembno, da regulativni organ sprejme ta načrt in ga ne prejme samo v pregled.
However, it is important that this plan is adopted by the regulatory body and not just submitted for review.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da bi moral regulativni organ v sodelovanju z upravljavci prenosnih omrežij razviti pravila za preglednost, ki pa jih ne pregleda samo agencija.
The Rapporteur is convinced that rules on transparency should be developed, in consultation with the TSOs, by the regulatory body and not only reviewed by the Agency.
Poročevalec sicer pozdravlja razvijanje smernic na evropski ravni, vendar upa, da bodo postale zavezujoče za najpomembnejše elemente.
While he welcomes the development of guidelines at EU level, he would prefer to see these guidelines become binding on the most important elements.
Prav tako poudarja, da se preglednost na posameznih mestih uredbe napačno pojmuje v smislu spremljanja in poročanja, zato bo v svojem poročilu ta mesta ustrezno ločil.
He would also like to point out that in some parts of the Regulation, transparency seems to be mistaken with monitoring and reporting, so he would like to differentiate these parts accordingly in his report.
Poročevalec meni, da usklajevanje ni poudarek predloga.
The Rapporteur believes that harmonisation is not being put at the forefront of the proposal.
Obstoj 27 različnih regulativnih okvirov je ena izmed glavnih težav pri povezovanju energetskih trgov.
The existence of 27 different regulatory frameworks is one of the main obstacles to integration of the energy markets.
Zaradi tega poročevalec meni, da prostovoljno usklajevanje tržnih in tehničnih pravil ne bo zadostno, da bi premagali obstoječe ovire pri čezmejnem trgovanju med državami članicami, ki izhajajo iz nezadostnega povezovanja.
Therefore, the Rapporteur believes that the voluntary nature of the harmonisation of technical and market rules will not be sufficient to overcome the existing barriers to cross-border trade between Member States derived from insufficient integration.
Zato je prepričan, da bi osrednji cilj paketa moralo biti usklajevanje tehničnih kodeksov in regulativnega okvira.
For this reason, he thinks that harmonisation of technical codes as well as of the regulatory framework should be one of the core objectives of the package.
Regionalni trgi
Regional markets
Poročevalec pozdravlja vključevanje razvoja regionalnih trgov v uredbe in direktive kot pozitiven korak na poti k povezovanju.
The Rapporteur welcomes the inclusion in the Regulations and Directives of the development of regional markets as a positive step towards integration.
Nedavni napredek na tem področju in že uspešno vzpostavljeni trgi, na primer nordijski trg, bi lahko služili kot trdna podlaga za primerjanje različnih modelov in morebitno uporabo nekaterih izmed izkušenj na evropski ravni.
Indeed, the recent progress in this field, as well as already well established ones such as the Nordic market, could provide a solid basis to compare different models and to possibly extrapolate some of these experiences at an EU level.
Ravni medsebojne povezanosti
Interconnection levels
Poročevalec pozdravlja imenovanje posebnih koordinatorjev, da bodo pospešili razvoj štirih glavnih projektov medsebojne povezanosti med državami članicami, ki so v mirovanju.
The Rapporteur welcomes the appointment of special Coordinators to speed the development of the main four interconnection projects between Member States that have been stalling.
Prepričan je, da bodo koordinatorji s svojim posredovanjem med vsemi akterji in zainteresiranimi stranmi lahko pozitivno vplivali na pospeševanje teh postopkov.
He believes that they can have a positive influence in speeding up these processes by mediating between all actors and interested parties.
Ti posamezni primeri so sicer pomembni, vendar predstavljajo samo majhen del problema, saj pri projektih za povečanje zmogljivosti medsebojnega povezovanja med državami članicami še vedno ostajajo številne politične, tehnične in upravne ovire znotraj Evropske unije, kljub temu da je veliko teh projektov gospodarsko in tehnično izvedljivih.
However, these individual cases, while important in nature, are only a small part of the problem and many political, technical and administrative obstacles still remain throughout the European Union to increasing interconnection capacity between Member States even where these projects are economically and technically viable.
Predlog Evropske komisije za tretji zakonodajni sveženj o energetski liberalizaciji se osredotoča na povezovanje in dokončanje konkurenčnega, preglednega ter na solidarnosti temelječega in nediskriminacijskega enotnega energetskega trga EU.
The proposal of the European Commission for a third legislative liberalization energy package focuses on the integration and completion of a competitive, transparent, solidarity-based and non-discriminatory single EU energy market.
Za dosego teh ciljev, bi morale vse zainteresirane strani skrbno preučiti vse ovire ter jih odstraniti, da bi pospešile proces povezovanja in usklajevanja.
To achieve these goals all impediments should be approached with due care and by all stakeholders and be removed to speed up the process of integration and harmonization.
Predvideva se, da bosta koncepta ločevanja lastništva in neodvisnega upravljavca omrežja kot nadomestni možnosti prispevala k boljšemu okolju za konkurenco in zmanjšanje cen energije, pa tudi k lažjemu prihodu novih subjektov na trg – ta skupek dejavnikov je bistven za koristi potrošnikov in gospodarstva.
The concepts of Ownership Unbundling and Independent System Operator as an alternative are supposed to contribute to a better environment for competition and reduction of energy prices as well as easier entrance of new players on the market – this complex of factors being crucial for the benefit of consumers and economies.
Rešitve bi bilo treba pripraviti ob upoštevanju razpoložljivosti veljavnih pravnih okvirov 27 držav članic in ovir, ki izhajajo iz tega stanja, ter bi morale temeljiti na empirično preverljivih podatkih.
Solutions should be elaborated taking into consideration the availability of the current legal frameworks of 27 Member States and the obstacles stemming from this status-quo and should be based on empirically verifiable data.
Nadalje bi bilo treba spodbujati bistvene možnosti, da se okrepi regionalno sodelovanje ter naložbene ocene in načrtovanje.
Vital options should furthermore be promoted for enhancing regional cooperation and investment estimations and planning.
Kar zadeva optimalno uporabo infrastrukture in povezovalnih zmogljivosti je treba upoštevati, da so dodatne naložbe v omrežje v nekaterih primerih v veliki meri odvisne od poprejšnjih naložbenih portfeljev.
For the optimal use of the infrastructure and interconnection capacity it has to be taken into account that in some cases further network investment considerably depends on previous investment portfolio.
Predlog uredbe o konkurenčnih energetskih trgih bi moral biti bolj uravnotežen, kar zadeva ne-kršenje temeljnih tržnih načel, ter ne bi smel imeti nasprotnega učinka in škodovati likvidnosti na trgu in pa naložbenim nameram.
The proposal for a regulation of competitive energy markets should be more balanced in terms of non-infringement of the fundamental market principles and not turn out to be counter-productive and damage market liquidity as well as investment intentions.
Nadzorni mehanizmi že obstajajo, s čimer je mišljena zakonodaja o konkurenci, ki so jo sprejeli organi na nacionalni in evropski ravni.
The control mechanisms are already in place considering the competition law that has been enacted by the authorities on a national and European level.
Pristojnosti regulatorjev v določeni meri ne bi smele posegati v tržne mehanizme in bi morale zagotavljati učinkovit nadzor nad stroški podjetij v korist potrošnikov.
The power of the regulators should be to an extent of non-intervention in market mechanisms and provide for effective control of the costs of the enterprises for the benefit of consumers.
Poročanje podjetij bi utegnilo biti koristno za nadaljnji razvoj trga, pa tudi za zagotavljanje preglednosti.
Reporting of the companies might be beneficial to further market development as well and ensure transparency.
Potrebna so pravila za sodelovanje med nacionalnimi regulatorji ter za uskladitev njihovih pristojnosti in pa okrepitev neodvisnosti na ravni držav.
Rules are needed for the cooperation among the national regulators and the harmonization of their powers as well as enhanced independence on a national level.
Prestrukturiranje energetskega trga na nacionalni ravni kot enega od vidikov predvideva popolno neodvisnost in avtonomnost upravljavcev prenosnih omrežij, s čimer se zagotovi prost in nediskriminacijski dostop do omrežja za vse udeležence na trgu.
The restructuring of the energy market on a national level envisages full independence and autonomy of Transmission System Operators (TSOs) as an aspect of the process thus ensuring the free and non-discriminatory access to the grid of all market participants.
Zelo pomembno je nepristransko obravnavanje upravljavcev prenosnih omrežij, ki so v javni in zasebni lasti.
Equal treatment of publicly and privately held TSOs is of considerable importance.
Poleg tega je v okviru evropskega omrežja upravljavcev prenosnega omrežja potrebno tesnejše sodelovanje upravljavcev prenosnih omrežij.
Furthermore, a stronger TSO cooperation is needed in the framework of the European Network of Transmission System Operators (ENTSO).
Širjenje ali izboljšanje čezmejne infrastrukture in pa nadaljnje povezovanje evropskih energetskih trgov bi bilo mogoče doseči prek podlage za usklajevanje sedanjih in prihodnjih naložb v omrežje, s katero bi regionalni trgi postali bolj skladni.
The expansion or improvement of cross-border infrastructure as well as further integration of the European energy markets might be achieved via such an appropriate base for coordination of current and future network investments to make regional markets more coherent.
Upoštevati je treba, da se prihodki iz upravljanja prezasedenosti pretežno uporabljajo za zmanjševanje nacionalnih tarif.
It has to be taken into consideration that the income from congestion management is predominately used to reduce national tariffs.
Verjetno bi vsaka sprememba tega postopka utegnila povzročiti skokovito povišanje omrežnih tarif.
Presumably, any change of this procedure might result in grid tariffs jumping up.
Če se za proizvodnjo oblikuje preudarna shema dodeljevanja, bi bilo mogoče prihraniti finančna sredstva, ki jih ne bi bilo treba nameniti za krepitev omrežja.
An important focus of decision-making should be the fact that there is a fundamental lack of allocation of generation capacity all over Europe.
Upoštevati je treba, da se prihodki iz upravljanja prezasedenosti pretežno uporabljajo za zmanjševanje nacionalnih tarif.
If a clever allocation scheme for generation is devised, financial resources might be saved from directing them to strengthen the grid.
Rešiti bi bilo mogoče prezasedenost in nacionalna gospodarstva bi utegnila uživati uspešnejši razvoj.
Congestions might be solved, and national economies might enjoy a more viable development.
Člen 2c – odstavek 1 – uvodni del
Article 2c – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Evropsko omrežje upravljavcev prenosnega omrežja za električno energijo:
The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity shall:
Direktiva daje evropskemu omrežju upravljavcev prenosnega omrežja za električno energijo preširoka pooblastila, s tem, ko predvideva, da sprejme tehnični in tržni kodeks.
The Directive gives too broad powers to ENTSO in providing that it adopts technical and market codes.
Pred tem je vseeno treba opraviti široka posvetovanja, da se zagotovi primerno upoštevanje stališč zainteresiranih strani na trgu.
However before adopting them, extensive consultations have to be conducted to ensure that the positions of Market Stakeholders are duly taken into consideration.
Člen 2c – odstavek 1 – točka (a)
Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (a)
(a) po posvetovanju z zadevnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi pripravi in predlaga tehnični in tržni kodeks na področjih iz odstavka 3;
(a) prepare and propose the technical and market codes in the areas mentioned in paragraph 3 , following consultation of the relevant stakeholders ;
Člen 2c – odstavek 1 – točka (b)
Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (b)
(b) sprejme orodja za skupno upravljanje omrežij in načrte raziskav;
(b) adopt common network operation tools and research plans;
Člen 2c – odstavek 1 – točka (c)
Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (c)
(c) sprejme in objavi 10-letni naložbeni načrt, vključno z napovedjo glede zadostnosti proizvodnje, in sicer vsako drugo leto;
(c) adopt and publish a 10-year investment plan, including a generation adequacy outlook, every two years;
Člen 2c – odstavek 1 – točka (d)
Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (d)
(d) sprejme letni delovni program;
(d) adopt an annual work programme;
Člen 2c – odstavek 1 – točka (e)
Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (e)
(e) sprejme letno poročilo;
(e) adopt an annual report;
Člen 2c – odstavek 1 – točka (f)
Article 2c – paragraph 1 – point (f)