natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sistematična izključitev pravnih oseb iz tega pojma je upravičena zaradi cilja jasnosti.
The systematic exclusion of legal persons from this definition is justified in the interests of clarity.
Sprejeti je treba čim bolj objektivna merila: „velikost“ podjetja je pojem, ki se pogosto zelo različno razume.
Criteria should be adopted which are as objective as possible: company ‘size’ is a concept that is too open to interpretation.
Poročevalka daje prednost negativnemu pristopu k cilju sporazuma, ker ta prevladuje v pravu Skupnosti in nacionalnih zakonodajah.
Your rapporteur favours the negative approach of the purpose of the agreement, as that seems to prevail in both Community law and national legislation.
Ker je potrošnik zaščiten le, če sklene pogodbo s poslovnim subjektom, poročevalka priporoča preprosto in jasno opredelitev tega pojma, ki bo odpravila veliko število uporabljanih izrazov (prodajalec, dobavitelj, distributer).
As the consumer is only protected when he enters into a contract with a professional, your rapporteur recommends a simple and clear definition of this concept, and ending the use of multiple terms (seller, supplier, distributor, etc.).
V tem smislu ni treba razlikovati glede na vrsto izvajane dejavnosti (trgovinska, industrijska, obrtna, svobodna), če se ta dejavnost izvaja poslovno.
It is then not necessary to make distinctions based on the nature of the activity pursued (commercial, industrial, craft, professional); it is sufficient that it is exercised on a professional basis.
Jasno je, da je lahko poslovni subjekt fizična ali pravna oseba.
Obviously the professional can be a natural or legal person.
Zdaj se določbe o nepravičnih pogodbenih pogojih uporabljajo le za pogoje, ki niso bili individualno dogovorjeni.
Currently the provisions on unfair contractual terms only apply to terms that have not been individually negotiated.
Poročevalka ocenjuje, da je v nekaterih primerih potrošnika treba nujno zavarovati, kar zadeva pogoje, ki so bili individualno dogovorjeni.
Your rapporteur considers that, in certain cases, it could be necessary to protect consumers even where terms have been individually negotiated.
Pogodbena svoboda mora nedvomno ostati temeljna, vendar potrošnik ne more vedno oceniti pomena svojih obveznosti do poslovnega subjekta, ki ima tehnično znanje.
Obviously the principle of contractual freedom must be maintained, but the consumer is not always able judge the effect of his commitments faced with a professional having technical expertise.
Seznam, ki je priložen sedanji direktivi, je izključno okviren in ga torej države članice različno razumejo.
The list annexed to the current directive is purely indicative and is consequently subject to differing interpretations by the Member States.
Za okrepitev zaupanja potrošnikov v notranji trg poročevalka priporoča uvedbo prožnega instrumenta, ki bo potrošnike bolje zaščitil:
In order to enhance consumer confidence in the internal market, your rapporteur recommends establishing a flexible arrangement providing greater protection.
– Prepovedani pogoji: kratek seznam pogojev, ki so značilni za najpomembnejša pogodbena neravnotežja.
- Banned terms: a short list of terms characterising the most important contractual imbalances;
– Domnevno nepravični pogoji: seznam pogojev, pri katerih bi lahko poslovni subjekt dokazal pravičnost.
- Terms presumed to be unfair: a list of terms which the professional could demonstrate not to be unfair;
– Ostali pogoji: vsi ostali pogoji, katerih nepravičnost bi lahko potrošnik dokazal s tožbo na sodišču.
- Other terms: all other terms which the consumer could demonstrate to be unfair by means of legal action.
Obseg preskusa nepravičnosti
Scope of the unfairness test
Poročevalka priporoča razširitev preskusa nepravičnosti na vse bistvene pogoje pogodbe, vključno s tistimi, ki zadevajo glavno vsebino in predvideno ceno.
Your rapporteur recommends widening the unfairness test to all the core terms of a contract, including the main subject matter of the contract and the assessment of the price.
Nekatere zavarovalne pogodbe na primer vključujejo pogoje izključitve garancije, katerih nepravičnost je mogoče ugotoviti na podlagi sedanjih določb, ker ta garancija dejansko pomeni predmet pogodbe.
Certain insurance contracts, for example, contain terms on exclusion of guarantee which under the current provisions cannot be deemed unfair because it is precisely the guarantee which is the subject of the contract.
Pravica do odstopa od pogodbe
Right of withdrawal
Trajanje in načini izračuna
Duration and calculation method
Poročevalka priporoča poenotenje načinov izračuna obdobja ter podpira koledarski način določitve (ki vključuje praznike, če se med državami članicami razlikujejo).
Your rapporteur recommends standardising the methods for calculating the duration by opting for a calendar-based calculation (including public holidays because they differ in each of the Member States).
Jasno je treba določiti tudi začetno točko obdobja.
The start of the period should also be fixed unequivocally.
Poročevalka predlaga, da se za to začetno točko obdobja določi trenutek, ko lahko potrošnik poda svobodno in utemeljeno soglasje, in sicer, ko potrošnik fizično prevzame blago.
Your rapporteur proposes fixing that starting point at the moment when the consumer is able to give free and informed consent, i.e. when he is in possession of the goods.
V nasprotju s tem poročevalka ocenjuje, da trajanje obdobja ne more biti enotno.
However, your rapporteur does not consider that the period can be made uniform.
Države članice imajo na tem področju različne tradicije, katerim so naklonjene.
This is an area in which Member States have different traditions to which they are attached.
Razen tega so obdobja v skladu z različnimi cilji, ki zagotovo upravičujejo različna trajanja.
In addition, these periods correspond to different objectives which certainly justify variable durations.
Na področju prodaje na daljavo je treba potrošniku omogočiti, da se odloča glede blaga, ki ga ob sklenitvi pogodbe še ni fizično prevzel, medtem ko gre pri predpostavki o prodaji od vrat do vrat za odobritev spremembe odločitve, ki bi se lahko sprejela nepričakovano.
As regards distance selling, it is a matter of allowing the consumer to make up his mind about an item which he did not have in his possession at the moment the contract was concluded, while in the case of doorstep selling it is a matter of authorising the consumer to change a decision which may have been taken hurriedly.
Način izvajanja
Method of exercising the right
Med državami članicami in direktivami obstajajo pomembne razlike (preprost dopis, priporočeno pismo, vračilo blaga).
Major divergences exist between the Member States and between the directives (simply in writing, by registered letter, return of goods).
Razen tega se razvijajo nekatere prakse, ki ovirajo izvajanje pravice do odstopa od pogodbe (obveznost pridobitve številke vračila pred vračanjem izdelkov, obveznost pošiljanja v nepoškodovani originalni embalaži ...)
Moreover, certain practices which hinder the right of withdrawal (obligation to obtain a return number before sending the items back, obligation to return an item in the original, undamaged packing, etc.) are tending to emerge.
Končno, razvoj novih tehnologij povzroča, da preprosta elektronska pošta zadostuje za obveščanje o odstopu od pogodbe.
What is more, the development of new technologies provides an argument for a simple e-mail to be sufficient to indicate withdrawal.
Poročevalka meni, da se bo zaupanje potrošnikov v notranji trg znatno okrepilo, če bo horizontalni akt določil, da lahko potrošnik odstopi od pogodbe na kakršen koli način, pri čemer mora predložiti dokaz o odstopu.
In the opinion of your rapporteur, consumer confidence in the internal market will be greatly enhanced if the horizontal instrument permits withdrawal by any means, it being the consumer’s responsibility to provide proof of his withdrawal.
Prodaja potrošniškega blaga
Consumer sales
Opredelitev pojma dostave in zakonodaje o prenosu tveganja
Definition of delivery and rules on passing of risk
Vprašanje, kdo prevzame tveganje in stroške zaradi okvare prodanega blaga, je zdaj v državah članicah urejeno na različne načine.
Currently, the question of who assumes the risk and the cost of any deterioration of the goods sold is regulated differently depending on the Member State concerned.
V nekaterih se tveganje prenese na kupca ob sklenitvi pogodbe, v drugih pa se prenos tveganja zgodi v trenutku dostave.
In some Member States, the risk passes to the buyer at the moment the contract is concluded, while in others the risk passes at the moment of delivery.
Poročevalka predlaga hkratno vključitev obeh vprašanj v horizontalni akt.
Your rapporteur proposes including these two issues jointly in the horizontal instrument.
Neposredna odgovornost prodajalca za neskladnost
Direct producers’ liability for non-conformity
Poročevalka ocenjuje, da v horizontalni akt ni treba vključiti neposredne odgovornosti proizvajalcev za neskladnost.
Your rapporteur does not consider it appropriate for the horizontal instrument to introduce direct producers’ liability for non-conformity.
Direktiva o nekaterih vidikih prodaje potrošniškega blaga in z njim povezanih garancij se je nedavno prenesla v zakonodajo nekaterih držav članic, vendar na voljo ni bilo dovolj časa za presojo ustreznosti možnih sprememb.
The directive on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees has very recently been transposed in certain Member States and it is too early too assess the appropriateness of any modifications.
Razen tega se zdi, da uvedba neposredne odgovornosti proizvajalca povzroča več pravnih težav, med katerimi nekatere temeljijo na pogodbenem pravu (kot je dvom glede pravnih razmerij med neposrednimi stranmi v pogodbi).
MOREOVER, INTRODUCING DIRECT PRODUCERS’ LIABILITY FOR NON-CONFORMITY WOULD APPEAR TO RAISE A NUMBER OF LEGAL DIFFICULTIES, SOME OF WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF CONTRACT LAW (E.G. CHALLENGING THE PRINCIPLE OF PRIVITY OF CONTRACTS).
o zeleni knjigi o pregledu pravnega reda o varstvu potrošnikov
on Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis
– pripraviti letno poročilo o pritožbah in zahtevkih na tem področju,
- drawing up an annual report on complaints and claims by users in this area,
– izvesti programe usposabljanja in programe za spodbujanje finančne kulture;
- carrying out education programmes and programmes to promote a financial culture;
UL L 278, 11.10.1988, str.
OJ L 278, 11.10.1988, p.
33. ni bilo mogoče doseči usklajenega sistema na ravni EU;
33. has failed to achieve a harmonised system at EU level;
8. pozdravlja namero Komisije, da poenostavi in posodobi sedanji pravni red o varstvu potrošnikov ter tako olajša čezmejno trgovanje in poveča zaupanje potrošnikov;
Welcomes the Commission's ambition to simplify and modernise the existing consumer acquis, thus facilitating cross-border trade and strengthening consumer confidence;
13. opozarja na razpravo o skupni odškodnini in meni, da si ne glede na nacionalne razlike pri izvajanju pravil poslovanja zasluži nadaljnjo obravnavo; zahteva od Komisije, da predloži znanstveno in pravno oceno skupne odškodnine;
Recalls the discussion on collective redress and believes it deserves further consideration, despite national differences in the conduct of business rules; requests the Commission to submit a scientific and legal assessment of collective redress;
16. poziva države članice, da skladno izvajajo Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/65/ES z dne 23. septembra 2002 o trženju finančnih storitev potrošnikom na daljavo
Calls on all Member States to implement Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services
16. , da bi povečale zaupanje državljanov v čezmejne finančne storitve.
16. in a coherent way, in order to increase public confidence in cross-border financial services products.
Zelena knjiga o pregledu pravnega reda o varstvu potrošnikov
Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis
o zeleni knjigi o pregledu pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov
on Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. poudarja, da mora usklajevanje voditi k primerljivi ravni varstva potrošnikov v vseh državah članicah brez nepotrebnega usklajevanja vseh nacionalnih določb;
Points out that harmonisation should lead to a comparable level of consumer protection in all Member States without unnecessarily harmonising all national arrangements;
8. predlaga, da morajo za zagotavljanje pravne usklajenosti medsektorske določbe horizontalnega akta temeljiti na načelu ciljne popolne uskladitve;
Suggests that cross-cutting provisions of the horizontal instrument should be based on the principle of targeted full harmonisation, in order to ensure legal coherence;
11. meni, da se tako zaupanje potrošnikov in čezmejna trgovina lahko podpreta z razvojem sistema "modre zastave", ki bi stranem omogočal, da izberejo eno izmed več možnih standardnih pogojev za poslovanje, odobrenih v EU, ter da se več pozornosti nameni tem praktičnim rešitvam.
Considers that both consumer confidence and cross-border trade could be assisted by the development of a ‘blue flag’ system allowing parties to opt for one of a number of possible EU-approved standard terms and conditions of business, and that more effort could be directed towards such practical solutions.
Zelena knjiga o pregledu pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov
Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis
Zelena knjiga o pregledu pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov
on the Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Substitutes(s) present for the final vote
o predlogu Direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2001/114/ES o nekaterih vrstah delno ali v celoti dehidriranega konzerviranega mleka za prehrano ljudi
on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2001/114/EC relating to certain partly or wholly dehydrated preserved milk for human consumption
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0058 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0058 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0083/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0083/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0282/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0282/2007 ),
Evropska komisija
The European Commission
Predlog Komisije je omejen izključno na spremembe Priloge I Direktive 2001/114/ES.
The Commission proposal confines itself to amending Annex I to Directive 2001/114/EC.
Komisija predlaga, da se dovoli standardizacija vsebnosti beljakovin v Skupnosti v skladu s standardi Codexa Alimentariusa (najmanjša vsebnost beljakovin je 34 %, izražena v nemastni suhi snovi).
The Commission proposes allowing standardisation of protein content in the Community and bringing it into line with the standard of the Codex Alimentarius (a minimum protein content of 34%, expressed in fat-free dry matter).
Standardizacija vsebnosti beljakovin trenutno ni dovoljena.
Standardisation of protein content is not currently allowed.
Naravno vsebnost beljakovin zbranega mleka je treba ohraniti tudi v konzerviranem mleku.
The natural protein content of collected milk must be maintained in preserved milk.
Naravna vsebnost beljakovin v mleku v prahu je trenutno med 31 in 37 %.
The natural protein content of milk powder is currently between 31 and 37%.
Evropska mlečna industrija ter izvozniki mleka v prahu in kondenziranega mleka (za mleko v prahu in kondenzirano mleko bo v nadaljevanju uporabljen izraz konzervirano mleko) že dolgo zahtevajo uskladitev pravil Skupnosti o vsebnosti beljakovin v teh proizvodih z mednarodnimi standardi (Codex).
The European milk industry and exporters of milk powder and condensed milk (‘preserved milk’ means milk powder and condensed milk) have long been calling for the Community rules on protein content for these products to be brought into line with international standards (Codex).
Predlagana odobritev standardizacije z najmanjšo vsebnostjo beljakovin 34 %, izraženo v nemastni suhi snovi, bo evropskim proizvajalcem omogočila, da s svojimi konkurenti iz tretjih držav konkurirajo pod enakimi pogoji.
The proposed authorisation of standardisation at a minimum protein content of 34% expressed in fat-free dry matter makes it possible for European manufacturers to compete with manufacturers in third countries under the same conditions.
Konkurenti iz tretjih držav so lahko že do sedaj proizvajali v skladu s pravili Codexa in bili zato gospodarsko v prednosti.
Competitors from third countries are already allowed to produce in accordance with the Codex rules, putting them at an economic advantage.
Intervencijska cena za posneto mleko v prahu trenutno temelji na vsebnosti beljakovin 35,6 %.
The intervention price for skimmed milk powder (SMP) is currently based on a protein content of 35.6%.
Komisija pa sedaj predlaga uskladitev intervencijskega standarda z vrednostjo za standardizacijo vsebnosti beljakovin v višini 34 %, kar bo nujno privedlo do prilagoditev intervencijske cene za posneto mleko v prahu.
The Commission now proposes aligning the intervention standard with the value for protein standardisation of 34%, which will inevitably bring adjustments of the intervention price for SMP in its wake.
Predlog za znižanje intervencijske cene za posneto mleko v prahu je del predloga za spremembo skupne organizacije trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov (sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1255/1999), ki ga Evropski parlament obravnava v posebnem poročilu.
The proposal to lower the intervention price for SMP is part of the proposal to amend the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999), which is the subject of a separate European Parliament report.
Evropska komisija pričakuje, da bo standardizacija pri 34 % povzročila prihod znatnih količin beljakovin na trg EU.
The European Commission expects standardisation at 34% to mean that significant quantities of protein will come onto the EU market.
Evropska komisija glede na veliko povpraševanje pričakuje, da Skupnost zaradi povečane razpoložljivosti ne bo imela omembe vrednih dodatnih stroškov, oziroma da do teh sploh ne bo prišlo.
The Commission expects, in view of the high demand, that the increased availability will not lead to significant, if any, additional costs for the Community.
Zaradi standardizacije konzerviranega mleka ob istočasnem znižanju intervencijske cene za posneto mleko se bo verjetno nekoliko povečala proizvodnja posnetega mleka v prahu, medtem ko se bo večji del dodatne količine beljakovin, pridobljenih zaradi standardizacije, porabil pri večji proizvodnji sira in svežih mlečnih proizvodov.
Standardisation of preserved milk coupled with a lowering of the intervention price for SMP will probably lead to a slight increase in SMP production, while the bulk of the supplementary quantity of proteins obtained through standardisation will be absorbed by increased production of cheese and fresh dairy products.
Komisija obenem pričakuje, da bo to privedlo do večje rabe maščob v teh proizvodih ter sorazmerno s tem manjšo proizvodnjo masla in manjši izvoz masla.
The Commission expects, in turn, that that increase will generate a higher fat use in those products and correspondingly lower butter production and butter exports.
Evropska komisija meni, da bodo znižanje intervencijske cene za posneto mleko v prahu za 2,8 % od leta 2008 dalje in pričakovani nižji izdatki za izvoz masla omogočili proračunske prihranke.
In the view of the European Commission, the lowering of the intervention price for SMP by 28% as of 2008 and the expected lower expenditure on butter exports will lead to budgetary savings.
Poročevalka pozdravlja standardizacijo vsebnosti beljakovin, saj evropskim proizvajalcem omogoča konkuriranje z uvoženimi proizvodi na enaki ravni in poenostavlja mednarodno trgovino.
The rapporteur welcomes the standardisation of protein content, since it offers European manufacturers the chance to compete on an equal footing with imported products, as well as simplifying international trade.
Poročevalka zato podpira predlog Evropske komisije in ne predlaga nobenih nadaljnjih predlogov sprememb.
The rapporteur therefore supports the Commission’s proposal, suggesting no further amendments.
Vendar pa je treba poudariti, da bo Evropski parlament s predlogom o standardizaciji povezan predlog o znižanju intervencijske cene za posneto mleko v prahu (predlog za spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1255/1999 o skupni organizaciji trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov) obravnaval v posebnem poročilu.
It must, however, be stressed that the related proposal to lower the intervention price for SMP (proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products) will be the subject of a separate report by the European Parliament.
Poročevalka želi tudi opozoriti, da Evropska komisija zaradi standardizacije pričakuje nižje izdatke za izvoz masla in znižanje intervencijske cene za posneto mleko v prahu ter posledične proračunske prihranke.
The rapporteur also wishes to point out that the European Commission expects lower expenditure on butter exports and a lowering of the intervention price for SMP as a result of the standardisation, with consequent budgetary savings.
Poročevalka v okviru svojega mnenja o spremembi skupne organizacije trga za mleko in mlečne izdelke in ne v povezavi s tu obravnavanim predlogom priporoča oblikovanje programa prestrukturiranja sklada za mleko.
In the context of her opinion on the modification of the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products, and not in connection with the proposal being dealt with here, the rapporteur has recommended setting up a milk fund restructuring programme.
Program prestrukturiranja sklada za mleko bi se lahko uporabljal za ukrepe za podporo trgu in izobraževanje o prehranjevanju za sektor mleka, pomoč pri zagotavljanju "mehkega pristanka" za proizvajalce mleka pri bližajočem se pregledu (Health Check) ali za podporo pri morebitnih spremljevalnih ukrepih, ki bi lahko bili potrebni v sektorju mleka do leta 2013.
The milk fund restructuring programme could be used for market promotion and nutrition education measures for the milk sector, assistance towards ensuring a soft landing for milk producers in the forthcoming Health Check or support for any accompanying measures that may be needed in the milk sector between now and 2013.
Nekatere vrste delno ali v celoti dehidriranega konzerviranega mleka za prehrano ljudi (sprememba Direktive 2001/114/ES)
Certain partly or wholly dehydrated preserved milk for human consumption (amendment of Directive 2001/114/EC)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1255/1999 o skupni organizaciji trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products
**I Postopek sodelovanja (prva obravnava) večina oddanih glasov
**I Cooperation procedure (first reading)
***I Postopek soodločanja (prva obravnava) večina oddanih glasov
***I Codecision procedure (first reading)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0058 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0058 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0084/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0084/2007 ),