natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
„(ca) vozni park, ki je del kulturne dediščine, in obratuje v nacionalnih omrežjih, če je skladen z nacionalnimi varnostnimi pravili in predpisi;
"(ca) heritage rolling stock that runs on national networks providing that it complies with national safety rules and regulations;
(cb) železnice, ki so del kulturne dediščine, ter muzejske in turistične železnice, ki obratujejo v lastnih omrežjih, vključno z delavnicami ali voznimi sredstvi, ki so v lasti ali v uporabi takšnih železnic, in z osebjem, ki je tam zaposleno.”
(cb) heritage, museum and tourist railways that operate on their own network, including workshops or rolling stock that are owned by or based on such a railway or staff who are based on that railway."
Za ohranitev doslednosti s stališčem Parlamenta do direktive o interoperabilnosti železniškega sistema, ki je bilo sprejeto na prvi obravnavi, je treba pojasniti, da so vlaki, ki so del kulturne dediščine, in muzejski vlaki izvzeti iz te direktive, pod pogojem, da so skladni z nacionalnimi varnostnimi predpisi in da obratujejo v lastnih omrežjih.
In order to remain consistent with the Parliament's approved 1st reading position on the railway interoperability directive, it must be made clear that heritage and museum railways are exempt from this directive provided they comply with national safety rules or are operating on their own network.
Člen 1 – točka 5 – točka a a (novo)
Article 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Člen 7– odstavek 3 – pododstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 7– paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
(aa) v členu 3 se doda naslednji pododstavek:
(aa) in paragraph 3, the following subparagraph shall be added:
„Pred osnutkom ali spremembo SVC mora analiza stroškov in koristi pokazati, da pričakovani učinki razvoja SVC izboljšujejo raven varnosti prevoza in zagotavljajo čim boljšo uporabo železniškega sistema.“
"Before drafting or revising CSTs, a cost-benefit analysis must demonstrate that the expected effects of the development of CSTs shall improve the level of transport safety and the optimum use of the railway system.";
To besedilo spet uvaja predlog spremembe 14 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta glede razvoja skupnih varnostnih ciljev (SVC).
The text restores the amendment 14 of Parliament's first reading regarding the development of the common safety targets (CSTs).
Člen 1 – točka 7
Article 1 – point 7
"Člen 14
"Article 14
Vzdrževanje vozil
Maintenance of vehicles
Vsakemu vozilu se pred začetkom obratovanja oziroma pred uporabo v omrežju dodeli subjekt, ki je odgovoren za njegovo vzdrževanje, in ki se ga vnese v nacionalni register vozil (NRV).
Before it is placed in service or used on the network, each vehicle shall have an entity in charge of maintenance assigned to it and this entity shall be registered in the NVR in accordance with Article 33 of the Railway Interoperability Directive.
Vsakemu vozilu se pred začetkom obratovanja oziroma pred uporabo v omrežju dodeli subjekt, ki je odgovoren za njegovo vzdrževanje, in ki se ga vnese v nacionalni register vozil (NRV).
Each vehicle, before it is placed in service or used on the network, shall have an entity in charge of maintenance assigned to it and this entity shall be registered in the NVR in accordance with Article 33 of the Railway Interoperability Directive.
Subjekt, odgovoren za vzdrževanje, je lahko železniško podjetje, upravljavec infrastrukture ali imetnik.
A railway undertaking, an infrastructure manager or a keeper may be an entity in charge of maintenance.
Zadevni nacionalni varnostni organi lahko v izjemnih primerih, a le v okviru svojih omrežij, določijo odstopanja od obveznosti iz odstavka 1.
The relevant National Safety Authorities may, in exceptional cases and restricted to their respective networks, decide on derogations from the obligation provided for in paragraph 1.
Vsak subjekt, odgovoren za vzdrževanje, potrdilo pridobi v skladu z odstavkom 6.
Each entity in charge of maintenance shall be certified pursuant to paragraph 6.
Brez poseganja v pristojnosti železniških podjetij in upravljavcev infrastrukture, kakor je to določeno v členu 4, subjekt, odgovoren za vzdrževanje, z ustreznim sistemom vzdrževanja zagotovi, da vozila varno obratujejo.
Without prejudice to the responsibility of the railway undertakings and infrastructure managers as provided for in Article 4, the entity in charge of maintenance shall ensure that vehicles are in a safe state of running by means of a system for maintenance.
Če je subjekt, odgovoren za vzdrževanje, železniško podjetje oziroma upravljavec infrastrukture, se sistem iz odstavka 3 tega člena vzpostavi prek sistema varnega upravljanja iz člena 9.
Where the entity in charge of maintenance is a railway undertaking or an infrastructure manager the system referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article shall be established through the safety management system set out in Article 9.
Subjekt, odgovoren za vzdrževanje, izvaja vzdrževanje sam ali za to uporablja pogodbene vzdrževalne delavnice .
The entity in charge of maintenance shall carry out the maintenance itself or make use of contracted maintenance workshops .
Če pa subjekt, odgovoren za vzdrževanje, ni železniško podjetje oziroma upravljavec infrastrukture, lahko potrdilo pridobi v skladu z odstavkom 6.
If the entity in charge of maintenance is not a railway undertaking or an infrastructure manager it may be certified pursuant to paragraph 6.
Komisija na podlagi priporočila Agencije do ….* sprejme ukrep, s katerim uvede izdajanje potrdil za subjekte, odgovorne za vzdrževanje, kar zadeva njihov sistem vzdrževanja.
Based on a recommendation by the Agency, the Commission shall, by ..*.  , adopt a measure establishing certification of the entity in charge of maintenance with regard to its maintenance system.
Ta ukrep, namenjen spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive z njenim dopolnjevanjem, se sprejme v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 27(2a).
This measure, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 27(2a).
Navedeni ukrep vključuje zahteve v zvezi z izdajo potrdil subjektom, odgovornim za vzdrževanje, in sicer na podlagi odobritve njihovega sistema vzdrževanja, oblike in veljavnosti potrdil ter v zvezi z organom oziroma organi, pristojnimi za njihovo izdajanje, in ustreznimi nadzornimi postopki, ki so nujni za delovanje sistema izdajanja potrdil.
The measure shall include the requirements for the certification of the entity in charge of maintenance based on the approval of its maintenance system, the format and validity of the certificate and the body or bodies responsible for issuing it, and the controls necessary for the functioning of the certification system.
Komisija na podlagi priporočila Agencije najkasneje eno leto po začetku veljavnosti te direktive sprejme ukrep, s katerim uvede obvezno izdajanje potrdil za subjekte, odgovorne za vzdrževanje, kar zadeva njihov sistem vzdrževanja.
Based on a recommendation by the Agency, the Commission shall , at the latest one year after the entry into force of this Directive , adopt a measure establishing mandatory certification of the entity in charge of maintenance with regard to its maintenance system.
Navedeni ukrep vključuje zahteve v zvezi z izdajo potrdil subjektom, odgovornim za vzdrževanje, in sicer na podlagi odobritve njihovega sistema vzdrževanja , oblike in veljavnosti potrdil ter v zvezi z organom oziroma organi, pristojnimi za njihovo izdajanje, in ustreznimi nadzornimi postopki, ki so nujni za delovanje sistema izdajanja potrdil.
The measure shall include the requirements for the certification of the entity in charge of maintenance based on the approval of its maintenance system , the format and validity of the certificate and the body or bodies responsible for issuing it, and the controls necessary for the functioning of the certification system.
S potrdili, izdanimi v skladu z odstavkom 6 tega člena, se potrjuje skladnost z zahtevami iz odstavka 3 tega člena in veljajo po vsej Skupnosti.
The certificates granted in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article shall confirm compliance with the requirements referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article and shall be valid throughout the Community.
Če subjekt, odgovoren za vzdrževanje, potrdila nima, železniško podjetje oziroma infrastrukturni upravljavec s svojim sistemom varnega upravljanja iz člena 9 zagotovi, da se ustrezno uporabljajo vsi relevantni postopki vzdrževanja.";
If the entity in charge of maintenance is not certified, a railway undertaking or an infrastructure manager shall ensure, through its safety management system set out in Article 9, that all relevant maintenance procedures are adequately applied.";
S potrdili, izdanimi v skladu z odstavkom 6 tega člena, se potrjuje skladnost z zahtevami iz odstavkov 3 in 4 tega člena in veljajo po vsej Skupnosti.
The certificates granted in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article shall confirm compliance with the requirements referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article and shall be valid throughout the Community.
Agencija oceni proces izdajanja obveznih potrdil, ki se izvaja v skladu z odstavkom 6, in Komisiji posreduje poročilo najkasneje tri leta po začetku veljavnosti ustreznega ukrepa.
The Agency shall evaluate the mandatory certification process implemented pursuant to paragraph 6 by submitting a report to the Commission, no later than three years after the entry into force of the relevant measure.
Kjer se na podlagi poročila Agencije in po posvetovanju s zainteresiranimi strani izkaže, da so potrebne izboljšave, lahko Komisija pripravi ustrezne zakonodajne predloge.“;
Where it appears, on the basis of the report of the Agency and after consulting stakeholders that improvements are necessary, the Commission may bring forward appropriate legislative proposals.";
* Eno leto po začetku veljavnosti te direktive.
* One year after the entry into force of this Directive.
Besedilo obnovi predlog spremembe 21 iz prve obravnave Parlamenta, tj. obvezni sistem izdajanja potrdil o vzdrževanju, obenem pa upošteva nove elemente in besedilo skupnega stališča Sveta.
The text restores the amendment 21 of Parliament's first reading, i.e. mandatory maintenance certification system, while at the same time takes into account new elements and wording of Council's Common position.
Komisija je 13. decembra 2006 Parlamentu in Svetu posredovala predlog o spremembi Direktive 2004/49/ES o varnosti na železnicah Skupnosti (direktiva o varnosti na železnicah)
On 13 December 2006 the Commission submitted to Parliament and the Council a proposal for the revision of Directive 2004/49/EC on safety on the Community’s railways (Railway Safety Directive)
Komisija je ta predlog predstavila skupaj z dvema drugima, t.j. z novo direktivo o interoperabilnosti ter spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 881/2004 o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za železniški promet.
The proposal was presented by the Commission together with other two legislatives proposals, i.e., the new Interoperability directive and the revision of the Regulation (EC) N° 881/2004 establishing a European Railway Agency.
Trije predlogi, vloženi v postopek soodločanja skupaj s sporočilom za izboljšanje prostega pretoka lokomotiv v EU, so sestavljali paket Komisije za izboljšanje vzajemnih odobritev železniškega voznega parka.
The three proposals submitted under codecision procedure together with the Communication aiming at the facilitation of the free movement of locomotives across the EU, was considered as being part of the Commission's package on cross acceptance of the rolling stock.
Evropski parlament je 29. decembra 2007 pripravil mnenje v prvi obravnavi kot del postopka soodločanja ter sprejel poročilo, v katerem je predlagal 27 sprememb besedila Komisije
On 29 of December 2007 the European Parliament issued an Opinion at first reading as part of the co-decision procedure and adopted a report in which it proposed 27 amendments to the Commission text
o vlogi državnih sodnikov v evropskem sodnem sistemu
on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system
– ob upoštevanju člena 61 Pogodbe ES, ki zagotavlja postopno vzpostavljanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, vključno z ukrepi na področju sodnega sodelovanja v civilnih in kazenskih zadevah,
– having regard to Article 61 of the EC Treaty, which provides for the progressive establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice including measures in the field of judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters,
– ob upoštevanju Haaškega programa za krepitev svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji
– having regard to the Hague Programme for strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union
1. , ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet v Bruslju 5. novembra 2004, in sporočila Komisije z dne 10. maja 2005 „Haaški program: Deset prednostnih nalog za naslednjih pet let“ ( KOM(2005)0184 ),
1. , adopted by the Brussels European Council on 5 November 2004, and to the Commission’s communication of 10 May 2005 on "The Hague Programme: Ten priorities for the next five years" ( COM(2005)0184 ),
– ob upoštevanju poziva z dne 14. in 15. decembra 2001 na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Laeknu za evropsko mrežo za spodbujanje hitre uvedbe usposabljanja za sodstvo, da se pomaga razviti zaupanje med vpletenimi v sodno sodelovanje,
– having regard to the call, made on 14-15 December 2001 by the Laeken European Council, for a European network to encourage the rapid setting-up of training for the judiciary, with a view to helping to develop trust between those involved in judicial cooperation,
– ob upoštevanju resolucij z dne 10. septembra 1991 o financiranju Akademije za evropsko pravo za Evropsko skupnost
– having regard to its resolutions of 10 September 1991 on the founding of an Academy of European Law for the European Community
33. in z dne 24. septembra 2002 o evropski mreži za usposabljanje sodstva
33. and of 24 September 2002 on the European Judicial Training Network
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije z dne 29. junija 2006 o usposabljanju na področju pravosodja v Evropski uniji (K OM(2006)0356) , z dne 5. septembra 2007 o Evropi rezultatov: uporaba prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2007)0502 ) in z dne 4. februarja 2008 o ustanovitvi foruma za razpravo o politikah in praksah EU na področju pravosodja ( KOM(2008)0038 ),
– having regard to the Commission's communications of 29 June 2006 on judicial training in the European Union ( COM(2006)0356 ) , of 5 September 2007 on a Europe of results: applying Community law ( COM(2007)0502 ) , and of 4 February 2008 on the creation of a Forum for discussing EU justice policies and practice ( COM(2008)0038 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2008/79/ES, Euratom, z dne 20. decembra 2007 o spremembi Protokola o statutu Sodišča
– having regard to Council Decision 2008/79/EC, Euratom of 20 December 2007 amending the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice
UL L 24, 29.1.2008, str.
OJ L 24, 29.1.2008, p.
42. in naslednjih sprememb Poslovnika Sodišča, ki uvajajo obvezen postopek predhodnega odločanja,
42. , and the consequent modifications of the Court of Justice's Rules of Procedure introducing an urgent preliminary ruling procedure,
– ob upoštevanju členov 81(2)(h) in 82(1)(c) prihodnje pogodbe o delovanju Unije, kot jo uvaja lizbonska pogodba, ki bi zagotovila pravno podlago za ukrepe, namenjene podpori za usposabljanje sodstva in sodnega osebja,
– having regard to Articles 81(2)(h) and 82(1)(c) of the future Treaty on the Functioning of the Union, as inserted by the Treaty of Lisbon, which would provide a legal basis for measures aimed at providing support for the training of the judiciary and judicial staff,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0224/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0224/2008 ),
A. ker je raziskava, ki je bila opravljena za namene te resolucije v drugi polovici leta 2007, poudarila:
A. whereas a survey carried out for the purposes of this resolution during the second half of 2007 highlighted:
– velike razlike pri državnih sodnikih glede poznavanja prava Skupnosti
– significant disparities in national judges' knowledge of Community law
Za namene te resolucije se pri sklicevanjih na pravo Skupnosti razume, kot da vključuje tudi pravo Unije. v Evropski uniji, pri čemer je to včasih zelo omejeno,
For the purposes of this resolution, references to Community law should be understood as also including Union law. across the European Union, with awareness of it being sometimes very limited,
– nujnost izboljšanja splošnega znanja tujih jezikov pri državnih sodnikih,
– the urgent need to enhance the overall foreign language skills of national judges,
– težave državnih sodnikov, s katerimi se srečujejo pri dostopanju do specifičnih in posodobljenih informacij o zakonodaji Skupnosti,
– the difficulties experienced by national judges in accessing specific and up-to-date information on Community law,
– potrebo po izboljšanju ter krepitvi začetnega in vseživljenjskega usposabljanja državnih sodnikov o zakonodaji Skupnosti,
– the need to improve and intensify the initial and life-long training of national judges in Community law,
– sorazmerno pomanjkanje znanja sodnikov o postopku predhodnega odločanja ter potrebo po krepitvi dialoga med državnimi sodniki in Sodiščem,
– the judges' relative lack of familiarity with the preliminary ruling procedure, and the need to reinforce the dialogue between national judges and the Court of Justice,
– dejstvo, da številni sodniki zakonodajo Skupnosti obravnavajo kot preveč zapleteno in nerazumljivo,
– the fact that Community law is perceived by many judges as excessively complex and opaque,
– potrebo po zagotavljanju, da je zakonodaja Skupnosti primernejša za uporabo pri državnih sodnikih,
– the need to ensure that Community law lends itself better to application by national judges,
B. ker so za usposabljanje sodstva, vključno z evropsko razsežnostjo, še vedno najodgovornejše države članice; ker zgoraj omenjeni Haaški program vsebuje izjavo Evropskega sveta, da naj se „prispevek EU sistematsko vključi v usposabljanje pravosodnih organov“
B. whereas the primary responsibility for judicial training, including its European dimension, rests with the Member States; whereas the above-mentioned Hague programme contains a statement by the European Council that "an EU component should be systematically included in the training of judicial authorities"
C. ker se zakonodaje Skupnosti ne sme obravnavati kot področja, ki je rezervirano za elitni organ strokovnjakov, in ker priložnosti za usposabljanje na tem področju ne smejo biti omejene na sodnike višjih sodišč, temveč enakomerno razširjene za sodnike na vseh ravneh sodnega sistema,
C. whereas Community law must not be perceived as an area reserved for an elite body of specialists, and whereas training opportunities in this area must not be confined to judges of the higher courts, but rather extended equally to judges at all levels of the judicial system,
D. ker so nekateri organi, ki jih finančno podpira Skupnost, vse uspešnejši ter že usposabljajo več sodnikov in državnih tožilcev,
D. whereas certain bodies supported financially by the Community are increasingly successful, and already train judges and state prosecutors in large numbers,
E. ker je znanje tujih jezikov bistveno za zagotovitev ustreznega sodnega sodelovanja, zlasti v civilnih in komercialnih zadevah, na področjih, na katerih je poskrbljeno za neposreden stik med sodniki, in za zagotovitev dostopa do programov izmenjave za sodnike,
E. whereas knowledge of foreign languages is crucial in ensuring proper judicial cooperation, in particular in civil and commercial matters, in areas where direct contact between judges is provided for, and in ensuring access to exchange programmes for judges,
F. ker zdaj postopek predhodnega odločanja kljub stalnemu prizadevanju Sodišča povprečno traja zelo dolgo in močno zmanjšuje privlačnost za državne sodnike,
F. whereas the current average duration of the preliminary ruling procedure, despite constant efforts on the part of the Court of Justice, remains excessively long and considerably reduces the attractiveness of this procedure for national judges,
G. ker je Sodišče določilo, da morajo države članice oblikovati sistem pravnih sredstev in postopkov, ki zagotavljajo spoštovanje pravice do učinkovitega sodnega varstva pravic, ki izhajajo iz prava Skupnosti
G. whereas the Court of Justice has held that it is for the Member States to establish a system of legal remedies and procedures which ensure respect for the right to effective judicial protection of rights derived from Community law
Zadeva C-50/00 P UPA [2002] ECR I-6677, odstavek 41. ,
Case C-50/00 P UPA [2002] ECR I-6677, at paragraph 41. ,
H. ker se nič iz te resolucije ne sme obravnavati kot element, ki vpliva na neodvisnost sodnikov in nacionalnih pravnih sistemov v skladu s priporočilom št.
H. whereas nothing in this resolution should be taken as affecting the independence of judges and of the national legal systems, in accordance with Recommendation No.
R(94)12 Odbora ministrov Sveta Evrope in evropsko listino iz leta 1998 o statutu za sodnike,
R(94)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe and the 1998 European Charter on the statute for judges,
Državni sodnik kot prvi sodnik zakonodaje Skupnosti
The national judge as first judge of Community law
Sodba Sodišča z dne 23. aprila 1986 v zadevi 294/83 „Les Verts“ proti Evropskemu parlamentu [1986] PSES 1339, odstavek 23. ; ugotavlja, da zakonodaja Skupnosti ostaja mrtva črka na papirju, če je države članice ne uporabljajo pravilno, vključno z državnimi sodniki, ki so zato osnova sodnega sistema Evropske unije in ki imajo osrednjo in nepogrešljivo vlogo pri ustanavljanju enotnega evropskega pravnega reda, nenazadnje glede na nedavne dosežke zakonodajalcev Skupnosti
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 23 April 1986 in Case 294/83 ‘ Les Verts’ v European Parliament [1986] ECR 1339, at paragraph 23. ; notes that Community law remains a dead letter if it is not properly applied in the Member States, including by national judges, who are therefore the keystone of the European Union judicial system and who play a central and indispensable role in the establishment of a single European legal order, not least in the light of the recent achievements by the Community legislature
Glej na primer Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o izvajanju pravil konkurence iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES (UL L 1, 4.1.2003, str.
See for example Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p.
1). , da se jih bolj dejavno vključi v izvajanje prava Skupnosti in se jim dodeli večja odgovornost;
1). to involve them more actively in, and accord them greater responsibility for, the implementation of Community law;
Vprašanja v zvezi z jezikom
Issues relating to language
4. opozarja, da je uporaba prava Skupnosti velik izziv za državne sodnike, zlasti za tiste v državah članicah, ki so se Evropski uniji pridružile maja 2004 in kasneje, zaradi česar je bilo treba okrepiti ukrepe za spodbujanje poklicnega usposabljanja za sodnike v teh državah članicah;
Notes that the application of Community law by national judges is a complex challenge for national judges, particularly for those in the Member States which joined the European Union in May 2004 and subsequently, making it necessary to step up measures to promote professional training for judges in those Member States;