natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3. nima zadostnih informacij o načinu integracije sistema v obstoječi okvir in njegovem delovanju znotraj njega, o morebitnih potrebnih spremembah obstoječih sistemov in o njegovih dejanskih stroških; zato meni, da je dejanska nujnost uvedbe takšnega sistema dvomljiva;
Does not have sufficient information on how this system will be integrated in – and interact with – the existing framework, on the possible changes that might need to be made to existing systems and on the actual costs generated by it; is therefore of the opinion that the absolute need to implement such a system remains doubtful;
Program za registrirane potnike (RTP)
Registered Traveller Programme (RTP)
9. priporoča usklajen pristop, zato Komisijo poziva, naj pospeši postopek na podlagi najboljših praks v državah članicah in zagotovi, da bodo države članice še naprej delovale skladno s pravom Skupnosti;
Advocates a harmonised approach and therefore urges the Commission to speed up the process, on the basis of best practices in Member States, and to make sure that Member States continue to act in conformity with Community law;
Elektronski sistem za odobritev potovanj (ESTA)
Electronic System of Travel Authorisation (ESTA)
14. se zaveda, da so biometrični podatki teoretično učinkoviti osebni identifikatorji, ker naj bi bile merjene značilnosti specifične za vsakega posameznika; vseeno poudarja, da biometrični podatki niso nikoli popolni in ne vedno natančni; zato opozarja, da bi bilo treba vedno poskrbeti za alternativne postopke in bolje oblikovati profile tveganj;
Is aware that biometrics are theoretically effective personal identifiers because the characteristics measured are thought to be unique to each person; however, underlines the fact that the reliability of biometrics is never absolute and that biometrics are not in all cases accurate; therefore points out that fall-back procedures should be provided for at all times and that risk profiles should be better elaborated;
19 prav tako obžaluje, da politika upravljanja meja Unije temelji na načelu, da je vsak potnik lahko osumljenec in mora zato dokazati svojo dobronamernost;
19 Deplores, moreover, the notion that the EU's border management policy should be founded on the idea that all travellers are potentially suspect and have to prove their good faith;
23. izraža dvom glede potrebnosti in sorazmernosti predvidenih ukrepov, saj ti prinašajo visoke stroške in lahko ogrozijo zaščito osebnih podatkov, zato meni, da bi jih bilo treba pred vsakršnim uradnim predlogom oceniti z vidika teh meril;
Expresses doubts concerning the need for, and the proportionality of, the proposed measures, given their expensive nature and the potential risks they pose for data protection; is therefore of the opinion that they should be assessed against those criteria before any formal proposal is envisaged;
Vzpostavitev schengenskega območja je zahtevala ponovni razmislek o konceptu „integriranega upravljanja meja“, ki ga je predlagal Evropski svet v Laeknu decembra 2001 in je kot „integrirani sistem upravljanja zunanjih meja“ dobil konkretnejšo obliko v sporočilu Evropske komisije iz leta 2002
The setting up of the Schengen area has entailed a new reflection on the concept of ‘integrated border management’ put forward by the Laeken European Council of December 2001 and pursued in a Communication of the European Commission from 2002
Na poti k integriranemu upravljanju zunanjih meja držav članic EU. in Haaškem programu.
Towards Integrated Management of External Borders of the Member States of the EU. as well as in the Hague Programme under the format of the ‘integrated management system for external borders’.
V sporočilu iz leta 2002 je bilo poudarjenih pet soodvisnih sestavnih delov, ki naj postanejo osnova za skupno politiko integriranega upravljanja zunanjih meja: (1) skupni korpus zakonodaje, (2) skupni mehanizem usklajevanja in operativnega sodelovanja, (3) skupna integrirana analiza tveganja, (4) osebje, usposobljeno v evropski razsežnosti in na področju medoperativne opreme, (5) delitev bremena med državami članicami glede evropskih mejnih straž.
In the 2002 Communication five mutually interdependent components have been emphasized as the basis of a common policy of integrated management of external borders: (1) common corpus of legislation, (2) common co-ordination and operational co-operation mechanism, (3) common integrated risk analysis, (4) staff trained in the European dimension and inter-operational equipment, (5) burden-sharing between Member States in the run-up to a European Corps of Border Guards.
Glede na to, da je „načrt iz leta 2002 zdaj končan“
The Commission, considering that the 'agenda set out in 2002 has now been completed'
Konsolidirani pravni okvir, poenostavljena pravila za obmejni promet (uredba (ES) št. 1931/2006), ustanovitev agencije FRONTEX, ki pokriva operativno razsežnost, ustanovitev Sklada za zunanje meje, ki zagotavlja finančno podporo državam članicam, ki so odgovorne za zahtevne dele zunanjih meja, in pomoč državam članicam, ki se soočajo z nenadnim in nepredvidljivim povečanjem priseljencev. (ne glede na to, da je še vedno treba sprejeti in/ali izvršiti številne zakonodajne pobude in/ali sisteme
Consolidated legal framework, simplified rules for local border traffic (Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006), establishment of the FRONTEX agency covering the operational dimension, creation of the External Borders Fund providing financial support to Member States with responsibility for long and difficult stretches of the external borders and to help Member States faced with a sudden and unforeseen upsurge of immigrants. (despite the fact that several legislative initiative and/or systems are still to be adopted and/or implemented
Primer: Vizumski zakonik Skupnosti, VIS, SIS II. ) in da „bi lahko razmislili tudi o nadaljnjih ukrepih za uresničitev resnično integriranega upravljanja meja z namenom izpolnitve dveh ciljev, in sicer povečanja varnosti in lajšanja potovanje državljanom tretjih držav“, je Komisija februarja 2008 v ta namen objavila sporočilo.
Ex.: Community Code on Visas, VIS, SIS II. ) and that 'further steps could be considered in order to reach a truly integrated border management with the aim of meeting the two objectives of enhancing security and facilitating travel for third-country nationals', has released a Communication to this aim in February 2008.
V njem je ponudila tri možne rešitve za državljani tretjih držav, ki potujejo v državo članico, vključeno v schengensko sodelovanje, ali državo, ki se je pridružila temu sodelovanju, in sicer: (1) uvedba beleženja vstopa/izstopa, (2) olajšanje prehoda meja za dobroverne potnike in (3) elektronski sistem za odobritev potovanj (ESTA).
Three tools which would apply with regard to third country nationals (TCNs) travelling to a Member State taking part in the Schengen cooperation or to a country associated to this cooperation are outlined in this Communication: (1) introduction of registration of entry/exit, (2) facilitation of border crossing for bona fide travellers and (3) an Electronic System of Travel Authorisation (ESTA).
Leta 2009 in 2010 namerava Komisija predložiti zakonodajne predloge, tako da bi nove ukrepe lahko izvajali med leti 2012 in 2015.
The Commission intends to be ready in 2009-2010 to present the legislative proposals in order to have the new measures on stream between 2012 and 2015.
Poročevalka meni, da bi Evropski parlament moral predstaviti svoje poglede na ta nov sklop ukrepov, ki jih predvideva Komisija, čeprav so šele na stopnji razvoja politike, saj bodo najverjetneje bistveno vplivali na razumevanje načina upravljanja meja, močno pa lahko vplivajo tudi na varstvo podatkov.
Your rapporteur considers that the European Parliament should provide its views on this new block of measures envisaged by the Commission, even if they are still in the policy development stage, as they are likely to bring substantial changes in the way border management is conceived and can have a huge impact in terms of data protection.
Poročilo temelji na okrogli mizi z dne 30. junija 2008 med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti, kjer so obravnavali svobodo in varnost pri integriranem upravljanju meja EU, dalje na srečanjih odbora LIBE o tej temi in stikih s predstavniki Komisije, evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, predstavniki držav članic in ministrstvom ZDA za domovinsko varnost.
The report builds upon the Round Table of 30 June 2008 'European Parliament-National Parliaments: Liberty and Security in the Integrated Management of EU Borders', LIBE meetings on this topic as well as upon contacts with representatives of the Commission, the European Data Protection Supervisor, Member States' representatives and the US Department of Homeland Security.
Mnenje poročevalke
Position of your rapporteur
Načrtovanje prihodnosti ob natančnem opazovanju sedanjosti
Designing the future while carefully observing the present
Glede primerjalnih preglednic je v oceni učinka poudarjeno, da „izhodiščno stanje, za katerega so narejene ocene, predvideva uspešno izvajanje ohranitve sedanjega stanja “.
When referring to the comparative scoreboard, the impact assessment underlines that 'the baseline situation against which the ratings are made assumes the successful implementation of the status-quo '.
Ta vidik je treba poudariti, ker mnogo instrumentov na področju upravljanja meja še ne deluje in tako ni mogoče podati pripomb glede njihove zmogljivosti.
This aspect has to be emphasized as currently in the area of border management several instruments are not yet operational and comments on their performance are therefore not yet possible.
Upravičeno je opozorjeno tudi na to, „da bi nedelovanje sistema VIS za preverjanje identitete na zunanjih mejah EU ter nezmožnost učinkovitega delovanja na vseh mejnih prehodih pomenilo, da bi prednostna možnost bila le delno koristna“, SEC (2008)0153, str.
It is also rightly pointed out that 'the failure of the VIS system for carrying out identity checks at EU external borders, and to operate efficiently and at all border crossing points would render the preferred option of limited benefit.', SEC (2008)0153, p.
Poročevalka prav tako meni, da je pred oblikovanjem kakršnih koli novih predlogov na tem področju nujno treba natančno pregledati in oceniti obstoječe ukrepe.
Your rapporteur also considers that a clear assessment and evaluation of existing measures is absolutely necessary before proceeding to any new proposals in this field.
Posebni ukrepi, primeri iz tujine in prihodnost
The specific measures, the foreign examples and the way forward
Ker je poročevalka določene pripombe že navedla v svojih delovnih dokumentih, bi želela (a) na kratko povzeti svoje poglede na predlagane ukrepe, (b) opozoriti na izkušnje na tem področju iz drugih držav in (c) poudariti nekatere ukrepe, ki jih je treba spodbujati na tem področju.
As specific comments have been already set out in the rapporteur's working documents, your rapporteur would like to (a) briefly summarise her views on the proposed measures, (b) to recall the experiences of other countries in this field and (c) to point out some of the actions that should be encouraged in this field.
Vstop/izstop, RTP, ESTA in razvoj drugod
Entry/Exit, RTP, ESTA and developments elsewhere
Ker ni celovitega osrednjega načrta z jasnimi cilji, zmogljivostmi in sinergijami za obstoječe programe in sisteme ter tiste, ki bodo šele sprejeti ali predlagani, je zelo težko pravilno oceniti, ali so novi sistemi, zlasti pa predlagani sistem vstopa/izstopa, resnično potrebni.
In the absence of a comprehensive master plan, explaining the objectives, the performances and the synergies to be required from the programmes and systems currently in place or to be adopted/proposed, it is rather difficult to correctly assess the absolute necessity of new systems, especially one like the proposed entry/exit system.
Poleg tega je treba tudi natančno opredeliti izraz „oseba, ki je presegla dovoljeno obdobje bivanja“ in poskrbeti za zanesljive podatke glede vzdrževanja takšnega sistema.
Moreover, a clear definition of the concept of 'overstayer' and reliable data to uphold such a system must be provided.
Glede RTP poročevalka načeloma podpira to zamisel, vendar opozarja na terminologijo, ki jo uporablja Komisija, in na to, da je treba zagotoviti natančne kriterije in razloge za beleženje/preklic (vključno z možnostjo pritožbe).
On the RTP your rapporteur supports in principle the concept, but draws the attention on the terminology used in the Communication and on the necessity to provide precise criteria and motifs for registration/revocation (including possibilities for appeal).
Končno predlaga usklajen pristop.
Finally, she advocates a harmonised approach.
V zvezi z zadnjim ukrepom, ki je bil februarja 2008 vključen v sveženj za meje ESTA, poročevalka meni, da je še prezgodaj za podajanje pripomb o koristi ali dodani vrednosti tega sistema.
On the last measure included in the February 2008 border package, ESTA, your rapporteur considers that it is too early to comment on its utility or added value.
Poročevalka pričakuje študijo o politiki in v nadaljevanju tudi tehnično študijo Komisije, v kateri bodo analizirani izvedljivost, praktične posledice in vpliv takšnega sistema.
She looks forward to the policy study, followed by a technical study of the Commission which will analyse the feasibility, the practical implications and the impact of such a system.
Šele takrat bo mogoča nadaljnja razprava o tem ukrepu.
It will only then be possible to further elaborate on this measure.
Poročevalka meni, da je v okviru teh ukrepov treba temeljito preučiti vpliv na pravice posameznikov do zasebnosti, hkrati pa so potrebna tudi tehnična posvetovanja za raziskovanje tehnologij, ki bi manj posegale v zasebnost in s katerimi bi se kar najbolj zmanjšala obdelava osebnih podatkov.
Your rapporteur is of the view that in the context of these measures a thorough reflection on the impact on the privacy rights of individuals must be conducted at the same time as the technical consultations also exploring less invasive technologies which can minimize the processing of personal data.
Ne gre pozabiti, de je treba veliko pozornosti nameniti tudi dejstvu, da bi se novi ukrepi v preveliki meri zanašali na biometrične podatke.
It should also be recalled that the extensive reliance on biometrics which would be entailed by these new measures should be carefully observed.
Primeri iz tujine, kjer so uvedli podobne ukrepe, kot jih predlaga Komisija, zlasti program ZDA za tehnologijo kazalnikov zvezi s statusom obiskovalcev in priseljencev US-VISIT ( United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology ), kažejo, da je pri takšnih ukrepih potrebna previdnost.
When looking at foreign examples which have embarked in similar measures as those put forward in the Communication, especially the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology (US-VISIT) Programme, a cautious approach must be adopted.
Cilj programa US-VISIT je povečati varnost državljanov in obiskovalcev ZDA, olajšati zakonita potovanja in trgovanje, zagotoviti celovitost ameriškega sistema priseljevanja in zaščititi zasebnost obiskovalcev.
The objective of US-VISIT is to enhance the security of US citizens and visitors, to facilitate legitimate travel and trade, to ensure the integrity of the US immigration system, and to protect the privacy of visitors.
Na podlagi teoretične izkušnje in po obisku v Washingtonu poročevalka meni, da program, kot je US-VISIT, dejansko lahko deluje s tehničnega stališča, in da ni nujno ovira pri omogočanju nemotenih tokov potnikov.
After a theoretical and 'on the ground' experience in Washington DC your rapporteur draws the conclusion that a programme like US VISIT can actually work from a technical point and that the programme as such is not by definition an obstacle to smooth travellers' flows.
Poudariti pa je treba, da ima urad ZDA za vladno odgovornost (GAO)
However, it should also be recalled that the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO)
GAO, predstavitev pred pododborom za boj proti terorizmu na mejah, morju in po vsem svetu, odborom za domovinsko varnost, predstavniškim domom z dne 28. junija 2007 z naslovom „ Prospects For Biometric US-VISIT Exit Capability Remain Unclear “, GAO-07-1044T. veliko vprašanj glede stroškovne učinkovitosti sistema.
GAO, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Border, Maritime and Global Counterterrorism, Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives, June 28, 2007, “Prospects For Biometric US-VISIT Exit Capability Remain Unclear”, GAO-07-1044T. raises many questions with regard to the cost-effectiveness of the system.
Kot že omenjeno, poročevalka meni, da bi prvi nujni korak morala biti kritična in podrobna ocena delovanja in učinkovitosti obstoječih sistemov in njihove interakcije, šele potem bi lahko nadaljevali razpravo o novih ukrepih.
As outlined previously your rapporteur considers that a necessary first step should be to critically and thoroughly assess the functioning and effectiveness of existing systems and their respective interactions in order to further discuss the necessity of new measures.
Hkrati bi bilo treba jasno določiti splošni okvir za vse obstoječe ukrepe in predlagane pobude, pa tudi za vprašanje varstva podatkov in potrebnih jamstev, ki naj se kar najhitreje zagotovijo med obdelavo.
At the same time the global framework for all the existing measures and proposed initiatives should be clearly outlined along with the issues on data protection and the necessary safeguards to be provided as soon as possible in the process.
Poročevalka je seznanjena z vprašalnikom o predlaganem sistemu vstopa/izstopa, ki ga je predsedstvo poslalo delegacijam držav članic EU ter Islandiji, Liechtensteinu, Norveški in Švici, in tudi z njihovimi odgovori.
She takes note of the questionnaire sent by the Presidency to the EU Member States' delegations as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland concerning the proposed entry/exit system, including their replies.
Meni, da bi bila o vseh treh ukrepih potrebna obsežnejša razprava, v kateri bi sodelovale vse ustrezne strani, in poudarja potrebo po javnih razpravah na nacionalni in evropski ravni.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that a more in-depth discussion on all three measures should be pursued with all the relevant actors, and stresses the need for public debates at national and European level.
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o strateškem partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Brazilijo
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the European Union-Brazil Strategic Partnership
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU (B6‑0449/2008)..............................................................15
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL (B6‑0449/2008)...............15
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................19
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................18
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................22
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................21
o strateškem partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Brazilijo
on the European Union-Brazil Strategic Partnership
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga je vložila Véronique De Keyser v imenu skupine PSE o strateškem partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Brazilijo ( B6-0449/2008 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Véronique De Keyser on behalf of the PSE Group on the European Union-Brazil Strategic Partnership ( B6‑0449/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji;
– having regard to Title V of the European Union Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sporazuma o sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Federativno republiko Brazilijo
– having regard to the Framework Agreement for Cooperation between the European Community and the Federal Republic of Brazil
UL L 262, 1.11.1995, str.
OJ L 262, 1.11.1995, p.
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sporazuma o medregionalnem sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Južnim skupnim trgom in njegovimi državami članicami na drugi strani
– having regard to the Interregional Framework Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Southern Common Market and its Party States, of the other part
UL L 69, 19.3.1996, str.
OJ L 69, 19.3.1996, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Strateškemu partnerstvu med EU in Brazilijo naproti" ( KOM(2007)0281 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled "Towards an EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership" ( COM(2007)0281 ),
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave s prvega vrha EU–Brazilija v Lizboni 4. julija 2007,
– having regard to the Joint Statement issued by the 1st EU-Brazil Summit in Lisbon on 4 July 2007,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2008 o petem vrhunskem srečanju latinskoameriških in karibskih držav in Evropske unije v Limi
– having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2008 on the Fifth Latin America and Caribbean-European Union Summit in Lima
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0177 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0177 . ,
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije iz Lime s petega vrhunskega srečanja latinskoameriških in karibskih držav in Evropske unije v Limi, Peru, 16. maja 2008,
– having regard to the Lima Declaration issued at the Fifth Latin America and Caribbean-European Union Summit in Lima, Peru, on 16 May 2008,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave z drugega vrha EU–Brazilija v Riu de Janeiru 22. decembra 2008,
– having regard to the Joint Statement issued by the 2nd EU-Brazil Summit in Rio de Janeiro on 22 December 2008,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0062/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0062/2009 ),
A. ker Brazilija postaja vse pomembnejši regionalni in svetovni subjekt in se je izkazala za ključnega sogovornika Evropski uniji,
A. whereas Brazil has become an increasingly significant regional and global player and has emerged as a key interlocutor for the EU,
B. ker sta Brazilija in Evropska unija partnerici z enako vizijo sveta in lahko spodbujata spremembe in iščeta rešitve po svetu,
B. whereas Brazil and the European Union are partners who share the same world vision, and can promote changes and solutions worldwide,
C. ker je prvo vrhunsko srečanje EU-Brazilija sprožilo strateško partnerstvo med EU in Brazilijo na podlagi njunih tesnih zgodovinskih, kulturnih in gospodarskih povezav in je bil na drugem vrhu EU–Brazilija sprejet skupni akcijski načrt, ki bo okvir za dejavnosti njunega strateškega partnerstva v triletnem obdobju,
C. whereas the 1st EU-Brazil Summit launched the EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership, on the basis of the parties' close historic, cultural and economic links, and the 2nd EU-Brazil Summit adopted a Joint Action Plan to be a framework for action in their Strategic Partnership over a three-year period,
D. ker imata partnerici skupne temeljne vrednote in načela, kot so demokracija, pravna država, spodbujanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, tržno gospodarstvo in družbena povezanost, ki so osnovni pogoji za razvoj strateškega partnerstva,
D. whereas the partners share fundamental values and principles such as democracy, the rule of law, and the promotion of human rights and fundamental freedoms, a market economy and social cohesion, which constitute basic pre-conditions for developing the Strategic Partnership,
E. ker so med drugim procesi političnega in gospodarskega povezovanja, vse višja stopnja gospodarske globalizacije in pomembnost razprav o demokraciji, človekovih pravicah in okolju spremenili prednostne naloge v programih obeh regij,
E. whereas priorities on the agendas of both regions have been changed by, inter alia, political and economic integration processes, the increasing rate of economic globalisation and the importance of the debate on democracy, human rights and the environment,