natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Niti proračunska podpora niti motivacijski delež ne smeta biti uporabljena za postavljanje novih pogojev, večje vmešavanje donatorjev v proračun in nacionalne politike ter omejevanje političnega prostora držav AKP.
Budgetary support and the ‘incentive tranche’ must not be used to introduce new conditionalities or provide donors with a means of interfering in the budget or national policies and reducing ACP countries’ political leeway.
Strog nadzor tega instrumenta je torej potreben, da se zagotovi:
Stringent control of this instrument is therefore essential to guarantee:
– da bodo ti pogoji izpolnjeni in se bodo preprečili odkloni, na katere je EP opozoril v zadnjem poročilu o razrešnici ERS,
- that these conditions are met and thus to avoid abuses highlighted by the EP in its latest report on the EDF discharge,
– da bo ta pomoč res prispevala k doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja,
- that this aid actually contributes to achieving the MDGs,
– da je udeležba nacionalnih parlamentov in civilne družbe učinkovita.
- that the national parliaments and civil societies are genuinely involved.
Motivacijski delež
The incentive tranche
Načeloma se z zamislijo o premiji za dobro upravljanje strinjamo, saj lahko okrepi politični dialog med EU in partnerskimi državami AKP v duhu 8. člena sporazuma iz Cotonouja.
In principle, we endorse the idea of a good governance ‘premium’, aimed at strengthening political dialogue between the EU and ACP partners in accordance with Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement.
Vendar v zvezi s tem obstaja veliko nejasnosti:
However, there is much uncertainty with regard to this provision:
Proces odločanja ni jasen.
The decision-making process is unclear.
EP, nacionalni parlamenti, nevladni akterji ali skupna parlamentarna skupščina nimajo nikakršnega nadzora in niso obveščeni.
No provision is made for scrutiny by or even provision of information to the EP, the parliaments, NSAs or the JPA.
Možno je le naknadno spremljanje na podlagi načrtov upravljanja, objavljenih v prilogi strateških dokumentov.
Monitoring is only possible a posteriori on the basis of the ‘governance plans’ published as a annex to the strategy papers.
Nekatera merila profilov upravljanja oziroma njihova razlaga so problematični.
Some of the criteria governing the ‘governance profiles’ or their interpretation raise problems.
Komisija je na seznam dodala merila, ki ne izhajajo neposredno iz dobrega upravljanja ali ki postavljajo v ospredje interese severa, na primer: liberalizacija trgov, boj proti terorizmu, delovanje proti orožju za množično uničenje, izvajanje obveznosti ponovnega sprejema migrantov itd.
The Commission has added to the list a number of criteria which do not relate directly to good governance, or primarily reflect the interests of the North, such as the liberalisation of markets, the fight against terrorism, commitments on weapons of mass destruction, implementation of the obligation to readmit migrants, etc.
Samo zunanji nadzornik načina in pogojev izplačila motivacijskega deleža, ki ni del Komisije (EP, nacionalni parlamenti, Skupna parlamentarna skupščina, nevladni akterji), bo zagotovil, da ne bo več dvoumnosti.
The only way to remove any ambiguity would be to provide for scrutiny outside the Commission (EP, Parliaments, JPA, NSA) of procedures and requirements for payment of the incentive tranche.
Tak nadzor je treba izrecno predvideti za izvajanje ERS.
This should be explicitly provided for in the implementation of the EDF.
Sofinanciranje in skladnost z drugimi instrumenti
Co-financing and consistency with other instruments
Še ena novost te uredbe: možnost sofinanciranja razvojnih projektov z državami članicami ali drugimi donatorji.
Another novel aspect of this regulation is the possibility of co-financing development projects with the Member States or other donors.
To je razvoj v pozitivni smeri ter odziv na pričakovanja institucij in nevladnih organizacij s področja razvoja.
This is a positive step, in line with the demands of the institutions and development NGOs.
V tem poročilu je poudarjeno, da je sofinanciranje lahko vzvod za krepitev partnerske politike med EU in državami AKP v skladu s smernicami nove strategije EU-Afrika.
This report stresses that co-financing should act as a means of strengthening the political partnership between the EU and the ACP countries, in keeping with the guidelines contained in the new EU-Africa strategy.
Priporočamo razširitev postopka sofinanciranja na druge finančne instrumente EU, da bi oblikovali vseafriški razvojni sklad, ki bi se financiral iz ERS in instrumenta sosedstva.
It recommends extending the co-financing procedure to other EU financial instruments in order to create a 'pan-African development fund' jointly funded from the EDF and the neighbourhood instrument.
Regionalno povezovanje, pomoč za trgovino in sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu
Regional integration, aid for trade and EPS
Evropska unija se je konec leta 2005 zavezala, da bo svojo pomoč za trgovino do leta 2010 zvišala na dve milijardi evrov (ena milijarda od Komisije, ena milijarda od držav članic).
At the end of 2005 the European Union undertook to increase its aid for trade by EUR 2 billion per year by 2010 (one billion from the Commission and one billion from the Member States).
Svet se je zavezal, da bo 50 % te dodatne pomoči namenil državam AKP.
The Council undertook to devote 50% of this additional aid to ACP countries.
To zavezo je treba izpolniti.
This commitment must be met.
Komisija je občutno povečala ta sredstva za rastoče potrebe na tem področju, pa tudi za financiranje prilagoditvenih ukrepov v gospodarstvu držav AKP, povezanih s sklenitvijo sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
The Commission has significantly increased these funds to meet the growing needs in this area, as well as to finance measures for the adjustment of ACP economies in connection with the conclusion of the EPAs.
Pri tej točki poročila vztraja pri dveh odločnih zahtevah EP:
On this point, the report stresses two major EP demands:
Čeprav EP politično podpira to obliko pomoči, je dolžan zastaviti vprašanje njenega financiranja.
While giving its political support to the introduction of this facility, the EP must raise the issue of its funding.
Predvideno je, da se bo ta instrument skupne zunanje in varnostne politike v obdobju 2008–2010 financiral iz sredstev ERS.
This instrument, which comes under the CFSP, is due to be financed from EDF appropriations for the period 2008-2010.
Ta odločitev ni sprejemljiva in ponovno dokazuje preusmerjanje sredstev za razvojno politike EU za druge cilje.
This decision is unacceptable and is a further demonstration of the way in which EU development policy resources are being diverted to serve other objectives.
S tem poročilom pozivamo, naj se postopek preuči znova ob pregledu financiranja te pomoči leta 2010.
This report calls for the procedure to be reconsidered following the review of the facility's funding in 2010.
o načrtovanju izvedbe 10. evropskega razvojnega sklada
on Programming Implementation of the 10th European Development Fund
A. ker je Komisija 21. februarja 2005 na Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti proti Svetu vložila tožbo v zadevi C-91/05 v zvezi z ukrepom skupne zunanje in varnostne politike o lahkem orožju in orožju majhnega kalibra v okviru Ekonomske skupnosti zahodnoafriških držav,
A. Having regard to Case C-91/05 brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 21 February 2005 by the Commission against the Council, concerning the CFSP action on Small Arms and Light Weapons in the framework of ECOWAS,
B. ker lahko sodba, ki jo bo sodišče izreklo o tej zadevi, postane mejnik za pojasnitev dolgotrajnega prizadevanja Sveta in Komisije za pristojnost na prekrivajočih se področjih razvoja in ukrepov skupne zunanje in varnostne politike,
B. Considering that the judgment to be delivered by the Court in this matter has the potential to become a landmark case for the clarification of the long-standing struggle between the Council and the Commission over competences in the overlapping fields of development and CSDP action,
3. opozarja, da je mirovna pomoč za Afriko še eden od primerov, pri katerem je mogoče dvomiti o „razvoju“ kot glavnem cilju te 250 milijonov EUR vredne finančne podpore; zato poziva, naj se pretehta možnost drugih virov za prihodnje dopolnjevanje mirovne pomoči za Afriko, na primer instrument stabilnosti;
Draws attention to the fact that the African Peace Facility (APF) represents another case in which "development" is disputed as the primary goal of this EUR 250 million financial envelope; urges, therefore, that a different sourcing be considered for the future replenishment of the AFP, such as the Stability Instrument;
6. obžaluje, da so postopki Skupnosti in Evropskega razvojnega sklada le delno usklajeni, v nasprotju s sklepom iz mednarodnega sporazuma med predstavniki vlad držav članic, da bodo te postopke kolikor je mogoče uskladili; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je prejel nacionalna in regionalna ocenjevalna poročila v vednost, obenem pa želi še posebej poudariti svojo željo, da se ga prav tako obvešča o poteku priprave strateških dokumentov, njihovem izvajanju in vmesnem pregledu.
Regrets that, contrary to the decision contained in the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States to harmonise Community and EDF procedures as far as possible, such harmonisation takes place only to a limited degree; in particular, whilst welcoming the fact of receiving the country and regional evaluation reports for information, underlines its wish to be kept equally informed about the process of preparing the strategic documents, their implementation and their mid-term review.
Odbor za proračun poziva Odbor za razvoj kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Development, as the committee responsible, to take account of the following remarks:
Prvič, Odbor za proračun je podpiral vključitev evropskega razvojnega sklada v splošni proračun na podlagi načela enotnosti proračuna in zaradi preglednosti, odgovornosti in učinkovitega izvrševanja.
Firstly, the Budgets Committee has supported the integration of the EDF into the general budget on the basis of the principle of unity of the budget and for reasons of transparency, accountability and effective implementation.
Sedanja razdrobljenost finančnih virov, ki so na voljo za zunanje odnose Unije, to zelo otežuje.
The current fragmentation of financial resources available for the external relations of the Union makes this much more difficult.
Poleg tega je odbor, da bi spodbudil učinkovito uporabo finančnih virov, poudaril, da bi bilo mogoče to nezadovoljivo stanje zaradi obstoja različnih finančnih uredb in različnih izvedbenih pravil, popraviti z vključitvijo v proračun.
The committee has also, in order to promote effective implementation of financial resources, underlined that, through budgetisation, the unsatisfactory situation of having different financial regulations and different implementing rules could be overcome.
Kljub temu sta odbor in Parlament kot celota poudarila, da vključitev v proračun ne sme finančno ogrožati drugih politik in bi jo torej bilo treba obravnavati znotraj finančnega okvira, ki bi ga bilo treba prilagoditi tako, da se v splošni proračun vključijo ustrezni dodatni viri.
Nevertheless, the committee as well as the Parliament as a whole, have also pointed out that budgetisation should not jeopardise other policies financially and would therefore have to be considered in the context of the financial framework, which would need to be adjusted so as to bring the corresponding additional resources into the general budget.
Glede na ravnanje Sveta je še prezgodaj, da bi bilo mogoče stvarno trditi, kdaj bi bilo to mogoče doseči za evropski razvojni sklad.
It is too early to say, realistically, when this might be achievable for the EDF given the attitude of the Council.
Naj izkoristim priložnost, da opozorim na uspešno sodelovanje med našima odboroma v zvezi z združevanjem zakonodajnih in proračunskih pristojnosti za dosego razvojnih ciljev.
Let me take the opportunity to recall the successful cooperation between our committees as concerns the combination of legislative and budgetary powers to achieve development objectives.
Zelo koristno orodje je uporaba proračuna v strateških primerih, kot sta vprašanje primerjalnih analiz ciljev Komisije in zadostna udeležba Parlamenta pri opredeljevanju strateških dokumentov.
The use of the budget, in strategic cases such as the issue over benchmarking targets for the Commission and sufficient involvement of the Parliament in the definition of strategic documents, has been a very useful tool.
Nedvomno podpiramo vaša prizadevanja za dosego podobnih smernic in parlamentarnega nadzora tudi za sredstva evropskega razvojnega sklada.
We are certainly supportive of your efforts to achieve similar guidelines and parliamentary scrutiny also for EDF funds.
Tudi v evropskem razvojnem skladu je Evropska komisija v zadnjih desetih letih vedno pogosteje uporabljala neposredno proračunsko pomoč kot mehanizem zagotavljanja sredstev EU, ki se mu daje prednost.
Also in the EDF, the Commission has over the last 10 years increasingly used direct budgetary aid as a preferred delivery mechanism for EU funds.
Odbor za proračun je poudaril, da je to lahko koristno, na primer v zvezi s „pooblastitvijo“ v razvojnem procesu v partnerskih državah in pri usklajevanju proračunov med donatorji.
The Budgets Committee has pointed out that this can have benefits, for example as regards "empowerment" of the development process in partner countries and in donor coordination of budgets.
Kljub temu smo vztrajno poudarjali, da je ta instrument treba uravnotežiti glede na to, če v zadevnih partnerskih državah obstajajo dovolj razviti sistemi finančnega in proračunskega upravljanja.
Nevertheless, we have also consistently pointed out that this instrument needs to be balanced against whether sufficiently developed budgetary and financial management systems are present in the partner countries concerned.
Odbor meni, da bi moral biti ta dejavnik nujno odločilen pri načrtovanju 10. evropskega razvojnega sklada, saj sta v mnogih državah AKP sistem finančnega in proračunskega upravljanja še vedno nezadostna.
The committee is of the opinion that this should necessarily be a key factor in the programming of the 10th EDF, as many ACP countries still have poor public financial management and budgetary systems.
Zato menimo, da je pri postopku načrtovanja potrebna večja stopnja individualnosti, da se čim bolj zmanjša tveganje in da se mehanizmi dodeljevanja ustrezno prilagodijo vsakemu primeru.
We therefore believe that a high degree of individuality is needed in the programming process to ensure that risk is minimised and that the appropriate delivery mechanisms are carefully tailored.
Pri tem upamo, da bo mogoče razvojne cilje Unije učinkovito dosegati v okviru 10. evropskega razvojnega sklada, obenem pa ohranjati zadovoljivo raven nadzora in odgovornosti porabe EU.
In doing so, we are hopeful that the Union's development objectives can be effectively pursued under the 10th EDF while maintaining a satisfactory level of supervision of and accountability of EU spending.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Združenimi arabskimi emirati o nekaterih vidikih zračnega prevoza
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the United Arab Emirates on certain aspects of air services
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2007)0134 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0134 )
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0472/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0472/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 51, 83(7) 43(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0043/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0043/2008 ),
Komisija je tako na pogajanjih z Združenimi arabskimi emirati izposlovala sprejetje sporazuma, ki nadomešča nekatere določbe v obstoječih dvostranskih sporazumih o zračnem prevozu med državami članicami in Združenimi arabskimi emirati.
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with the United Arab Emirates that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and the United Arab Emirates.
Po členu 4 določbe direktive 2003/96/ES prav tako veljajo za letala določenih letalskih prevoznikov Združenih arabskih emiratov, ki delujejo na ozemlju Skupnosti.
Under Article 4, the provisions of Directive 2003/96/EC likewise apply to aircraft of designated air carriers of the United Arab Emirates operating within the territory of the Community.
Poleg tega imajo Združeni arabski emirati pravico, da uvedejo davke na gorivo, dobavljeno na njihovem ozemlju za uporabo v letalu določenega letalskega prevoznika države članice, ki deluje na ozemlju Združenih arabskih emiratov.
Furthermore the United Arab Emirates is entitled to impose taxes on fuel supplied in its territory for use in aircraft of a designated air carrier of a Member State operating within the territory of the United Arab Emirates.
V prilogah 1 in 2 so navedeni dvostranski sporazumi in njihovi členi, na katere se sklicujejo členi 1 do 5 predlaganega sporazuma; to so sporazumi med Združenimi arabskimi emirati in Avstrijo, Belgijo, Bolgarijo, Ciprom, Češko, Dansko, Finsko, Francijo, Grčijo, Irsko, Italijo, Latvijo, Litvo, Luksemburgom, Malto, Nemčijo, Nizozemsko, Poljsko, Portugalsko, Slovenijo, Španijo, Švedsko in Združenim kraljestvom.
Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements and their articles which are referred to in Article 1 to 5 of the proposed Agreement; these are the agreements between the United Arab Emirates and Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
V prilogi 3 so naštete druge države, na katere se sklicuje člen 2; Islandija, Lihtenštajn in Norveška, za katere velja sporazum o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, ter Švica, za katero velja sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo.
Annex 3 lists the other states referred to in Article 2: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway - which fall under the Agreement on the European Economic Area - and Switzerland falling under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation.
Predlagani sklep Sveta pooblašča predsednika Sveta, da določi pristojno osebo ali osebe, ki obvestijo Združene arabske emirate o dokončanju notranjih postopkov, potrebnih za začetek veljavnosti sporazuma.
The proposed Council Decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person or persons competent to notify the United Arab Emirates that the internal procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement have been completed.
Sporazum med ES in Združenimi arabskimi emirati o nekaterih vidikih zračnega prevoza
Agreement between the EC and the United Arab Emirates on certain aspects of air services
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode ("Uredba o enotni SUT")
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (‘Single CMO Regulation’)
(Poenostavljeni postopek - člen 43 (1) poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure – Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta, razen v primerih, navedenih v členih 105, 107, 161 in 300 Pogodbe ES in členu 7 Pogodbe EU
majority of Parliament's component Members, except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
***II Postopek soodločanja (druga obravnava)
***II Codecision procedure: (second reading)
***III Postopek soodločanja (tretja obravnava)
***III Codecision procedure: (third reading)
večina oddanih glasov za odobritev skupnega besedila
majority of the votes cast to approve the joint text
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0854 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0854 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 36 in 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0033/2008 ),
– having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0033/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0044/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0044/2008 ),
Predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode ("Uredba o enotni SUT")
Common organisation of agricultural markets (amendment of the Single CMO Regulation)
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode ("Uredba o enotni SUT")
on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)
(Poenostavljeni postopek – člen 43(1) poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure – Rule 43 (1) of the Rules of Procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2008)0027 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2008)0027 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 36 in 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0061/2008 ),
– having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0061/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 51 in člena 43(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 43 (1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0045/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0045/2008 ),
Predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode ("Uredba o enotni SUT")
Common organisation of agricultural markets (Single CMO Regulation)
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št.1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode („Uredba o enotni SUT“) glede nacionalnih kvot za mleko
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (single CMO Regulation) as regards the national quotas for milk
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0802 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0802 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0015/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0015/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6–0045/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0046/2008 ),