natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalec soglaša z glavnim ciljem predloga Komisije o zagotovitvi višjih standardov obravnavanja prosilcev za azil v zvezi s pogoji za sprejem, ki bi v skladu z mednarodnim pravom zagotavljali dostojen življenjski standard.
Your rapporteur identifies wholeheartedly with the basic aim of the Commission proposal, namely ‘to ensure higher standards of treatment for asylum-seekers with regard to reception conditions that guarantee a dignified standard of living, in line with international law'.
Zaveda se, da je za številne pomanjkljivosti pogojev sprejema prosilcev za azil kriva različna razlaga in uporaba standardov v državah članicah, zato podpira okrepitev nadzornih pooblastil Komisije.
Aware that many of the shortcomings in the reception conditions for asylum-seekers are due to disparities in interpretation and application between the different Member States, your rapporteur supports the stepping up of the Commission’s monitoring powers.
Izmenjava dobre prakse med državami članicami bi morala torej prispevati k približevanju uporabe standardov sprejema.
The exchange of good practice between Member States should likewise contribute to greater convergence in the way these reception standards are applied.
Parlament bi moral prek odbora LIBE določiti koledar obiskov centov za pridržanje.
Parliament, through its LIBE Committee, should establish a timetable for visiting detention centres.
Humanitarna večina v Parlamentu, katere cilj je izboljšanje besedila, bi morala zavrniti vse predloge za omejitev jamstev, ki jih je predstavila Komisija, in jamstev iz predlogov sprememb poročevalca.
Any proposal seeking to limit the guarantees put forward by the Commission and those contained in the amendments put forward by your rapporteur should be rejected by a humanitarian majority within Parliament; the goal is to improve the text.
Poročevalec se zaveda, da bi prizadevanja za privilegirano obravnavo prosilcev za azil v primerjavi s priseljenci, ki želijo vstopiti v EU, lahko povečala število neutemeljenih prošenj.
Your rapporteur is aware that enhancing the privileged treatment of asylum-seekers vis-à-vis immigrants wishing to enter the EU may give rise to multiple applications without any grounds whatever.
Osebe, ki svetujejo prosilcem za azil, morajo prenesti načelo dobre vere v postopku.
Those who assess asylum-seekers should endeavour to put across the principle of procedural good faith.
To bi učinkovito in posredno prispevalo k čim boljšemu reševanju utemeljenih prošenj za azil.
This would also contribute effectively if indirectly to swifter processing of well-founded applications for asylum.
Poleg tega pa nova sodna praksa potrjuje trditev iz predloga Komisije o ustreznosti hkratne obravnave prosilcev za azil in za subsidiarno zaščito.
Recent case-law, moreover, confirms the thesis put forward in the Commission proposal as to the appropriateness of simultaneously dealing with individuals seeking asylum and those seeking subsidiary protection.
Emine Bozkurt, Mihael Brejc, Michael Cashman, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Armando França, Kinga Gál, Roland Gewalt, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Vladimir Uručev
Emine Bozkurt, Mihael Brejc, Michael Cashman, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Armando França, Kinga Gál, Roland Gewalt, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Vladimir Urutchev
o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete poslanca Alda Patriciella
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Aldo Patriciello
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Alda Patriciella za zaščito njegove imunitete v zvezi s preiskavo, ki jo vodi državno tožilstvo pri okrožnem sodišču Isernia, razglašene na plenarnem zasedanju 9. marca 2009,
– having regard to the request by Aldo Patriciello for defence of his immunity in connection with an investigation which is currently being carried out by the Public Prosecutor's Office attached to the Isernia District Court, announced in plenary sitting of 9 March 2009,
Primer 101/63 Wagner proti Fohrmannu in Krierju [1964] Poročila sodišča Evropskih skupnosti (ECR) 195, primer 149/85 Wybot proti Faureju in drugim [1986] ECR 2391 in združena primera C-200/07 in C-201/07 Marra proti De Gregorio in Clemente , ki jih poročila Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti še ne navajajo. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and Others [1986] ECR 2391 and Joined Cases C-200/07 and C-201/07 Marra v De Gregorio and Clemente , not yet reported in the European Court Reports. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0286/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0286/2009 ),
Zahteva se nanaša na preiskavo proti Aldu Patriciellu v zvezi s kaznivim dejanjem po členu 61(10) in členu 368 italijanskega kazenskega zakonika.
The request relates the investigation concerning Mr Aldo Patriciello in connection with an indictable offence pursuant to Article 61 (10) and 368 of the Italian Criminal Code, which in pending before the Isernia District Court's Public Prosecutor's Office
Za državnega tožilca sodišča v Isernii (Italija) je Aldo Patriciello med razpravo, ki je potekala v navzočnosti višjega podčastnika Gaetana Pirozzija, višjega štabnega vodnika Enza Valenteja, štabnega vodnika Luigija Ponzetta in orožnika Massima Santantonia, vseh razporejenih v orožniško četo pri centrali Venafro in po uradni dolžnosti obvezanih, da prijavijo kazniva dejanja, ki so se odzivali na obvestila o prekrških cestno prometnih predpisov, katere je občinska redarka v Petrilli Stefania Di Clemente izdala določenemu številu motoristov, ki so svoja vozila parkirali blizu nevrološkega intštituta Neuromed (Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo), izjavil, da je redarka [Stefania Di Clemente] ponarejala ure na obvestilih, čeprav pravno gledano v resnici ni prišlo do nobenega ponarejanja, kar pomeni, da jo je obtožil kršitve ponarejanja javnih listin, kljub temu, da je vedel, da je bila nedolžna.
Massimo Santantonio all serving with the company of Carabinieri stationed at Venafro HQ and all duty-bound to report criminal offences, who were responding to reports of a violation of the Highway Code issued by Stefania Di Clemente, a municipal police officer serving with the Municipality of Petrilli, concerning a number of motorists who had parked their vehicles near the ‘Neuromed’(Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo) facility, he stated that the latter [Stefania Di Clemente] had forged the times on the said report while in fact no forgery had legally occurred, thereby accusing her of the offence of forging public documents even though he knew she was innocent.
Aldo Patriciello se sklicuje na prvi odstavek člena 68(1) italijanske ustave, ki navaja, da: „Od poslancev ni mogoče zahtevati, da odgovarjajo za izraženo mnenje ali glas pri opravljanju svoje funkcije“.
Mr Patriciello calls for the application of the first paragraph of Article 68(1) of the Italian Constitution, which provides that: “Members of Parliament cannot be held accountable for the opinions expressed or votes cast in the performance of their function”.
Dejansko je Patriciello v svojih izjavah zgolj komentiral javna dejstva o pravicah državljanov do enostavnega dostopa do bolnišnice in zdravstvenih storitev, kar je pomembno za vsakodnevno življenje njegovih volivcev.
As a matter of fact, in his statements, Mr Patriciello merely commented on facts in the public domain, the rights of the citizens to have an easy access to a Hospital and to the healthcares, which had an important impact on the daily life of his constituents.
Poslanec Aldo Patriciello ni deloval v lastnem interesu, ni želel žaliti javnega uslužbenca, pač pa je v okviru svoje politične dejavnosti deloval v splošnem interesu svojih volivcev.
Mr Aldo Patriciello did not act for his own interest, he did not want insult the public official but he act for general interest of his electorate in the framework of his political activity.
Pri tem je opravljal dolžnost poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, tako da je pred svojimi volivci izrazil mnenje o zadevi javnega interesa.
In so doing he was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament in expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti zaščiti imunitete Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament zaščiti poslansko imuniteto Alda Patriciella.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Aldo Patriciello be defended.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o podpisu in začasni uporabi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in vlado Mongolije o nekaterih vidikih zračnega prevoza
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Mongolia on certain aspects of air services
(Poenostavljen postopek – člen 46(1) Poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure - Rule 46(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta (KOM2007)0731),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0731 ),
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0001/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0001/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 55, 90(8) in 46(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 55, 90(8) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7–0001/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7‑0001/2009 ),
Kot je razsodilo Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, ima Skupnost izključno pristojnost v zvezi z različnimi vidiki zunanje letalske politike, ki so jih običajno urejali dvostranski sporazumi o zračnem prevozu med državami članicami in tretjimi državami.
As ruled by the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the Community has exclusive competence with respect to various aspects of external aviation which were traditionally governed by bilateral air services agreements between Member States and third countries.
Komisija je tako na pogajanjih z mongolsko vlado dosegla sporazum, ki nadomešča nekatere določbe v obstoječih dvostranskih sporazumih o zračnem prevozu med državami članicami in Mongolijo.
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with the Government of Mongolia that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Mongolia.
Člen 4 (obdavčitev letalskega goriva): Običajni dvostranski sporazumi letalsko gorivo načeloma izvzemajo iz obdavčenja, direktiva Sveta 2003/96/ES, ki spreminja okvir Skupnosti na področju obdavčevanja energentov in električne energije, pa takšno obdavčenje na ozemlju Skupnosti dovoljuje.
Article 4 (taxation of aviation fuel): Whereas traditional bilateral agreements tend to exempt aircraft fuel in general from taxation, Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity permits such taxation for operations within the territory of the Community.
Člen 5 (določanje cen): Sporazum določa, da se za tarife, ki jih zaračunajo letalski prevozniki, kot jih določi Mongolija, uporablja pravo Evropske skupnosti za prevoz, ki se v celoti odvija znotraj Evropske skupnosti.
Article 5 (pricing): The agreement stipulates that tariffs to be charged by the air carriers designated by Mongolia for carriage wholly within the European Community shall be subject to European Community law.
Člen 6 (konkurenca): Ta člen usklajuje določbe dvostranskih sporazumov, ki so očitno protikonkurenčne, s konkurenčnim pravom EU.
Article 6 (competition): Brings provisions in bilateral agreements which are clearly anti-competitive in line with EU competition law.
Prilogi 1 in 2 vsebujeta seznam dvostranskih sporazumov in njihovih členov, ki so navedeni v členih 1 do 6 predlaganega sporazuma; to so sporazumi Mongolije z Avstrijo, Dansko, Finsko, Nemčijo, Madžarsko, Luksemburgom, Nizozemsko, Poljsko, Romunijo, Švedsko in Združenim kraljestvom.
Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements and their articles which are referred to in Articles 1 to 6 of the proposed Agreement; these are the agreements between Mongolia and Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Sweden and United Kingdom.
V Prilogi 3 so navedene ostale države iz člena 2: Islandija, Liechtenstein in Norveška, za katere velja sporazum o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, ter Švica, za katero velja sporazum o zračnem prevozu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo.
Annex 3 lists the other states referred to in Article 2: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway -which fall under the Agreement on the European Economic Area- and Switzerland falling under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport.
Predlagani sklep Sveta pooblašča predsednika Sveta, da določi pristojno osebo ali osebe, ki v imenu Skupnosti obvestijo Mongolijo o dokončanju notranjih postopkov, potrebnih za začetek veljavnosti sporazuma.
The proposed Council Decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person or persons competent to notify Mongolia that the internal procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement have been completed.
Parlament ima pravico, da predloži svoje mnenje o tem sporazumu v okviru postopka posvetovanja v skladu s členom 90(8) poslovnika (mednarodni sporazumi), ki navaja:
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement under the consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 90 'International agreements', paragraph 8, which reads as follows:
Sporazum ES/Mongolija o nekaterih vidikih zračnega prevoza
Agreement between the EC and Mongolia on certain aspects of air services
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola o spremembi Sporazuma o pomorskem prevozu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter vlado Ljudske republike Kitajske na drugi strani
on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Protocol amending the Agreement on Maritime Transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the People’s Republic of China, of the other part
(Poenostavljeni postopek – člen 46(1) poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure - Rule 46(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
- ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2008)0405 ),
- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2008)0405 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta (8127/2009),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( - 8127/2009),
– ob upoštevanju protokola o spremembi sporazuma o pomorskem prevozu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Vlado Ljudske republike Kitajske na drugi strani (13698/2009)
– having regard to the Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part (13698/2009)
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0030/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0030/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7–0002/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7‑0002/2009 ),
Bolgarija in Romunija sta 1. januarja 2007 pristopili k Evropski uniji.
Bulgaria and Romania acceded to the European Union on 1 January 2007.
V skladu s členom 6(2) akta o pogojih pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji mora biti pristop teh dveh držav k sporazumu o pomorskem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter vlado Ljudske republike Kitajske na drugi strani odobren s sklenitvijo protokola o spremembi tega sporazuma.
Under Article 6(2) of the Act concerning the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, their accession to the Agreement on Maritime Transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People’s Republic of China, of the other part, must be approved by the conclusion of a Protocol amending this Agreement.
Protokol mora skleniti Svet Evropske unije, ki odloča soglasno v imenu držav članic, s poenostavljenim postopkom, ki ga prav tako določa člen 6(2) akta o pristopu.
This Protocol must be concluded by means of a simplified procedure, as provided for in that same Article 6(2) of the Accession Act, by the Council of the European Union, acting unanimously on behalf of the Member States.
Komisija in kitajski predstavniki so 28. februarja 2008 v Pekingu parafirali osnutek protokola.
The draft Protocol was initialled by the Commission and the Chinese representatives in Beijing on 28 February 2008.
Protokol določa tehnične in jezikovne prilagoditve sporazuma zaradi pristopa dveh novih držav članic.
The Protocol provides for the necessary technical and linguistic adaptations of the Agreement that ensue from the accession of the two new Member States.
Parlament ima pravico podati mnenje o tem protokolu v okviru postopka posvetovanja v skladu z osmim odstavkom člena 90 poslovnika z naslovom„Mednarodni sporazumi“, ki se glasi:
Parliament has the right to deliver an opinion on the Protocol under the consultation procedure, pursuant to Rule 90, 'International agreements', paragraph 8, of its Rules of Procedure, which reads:
„Parlament da svoje mnenje ali privolitev za sklenitev, obnovo ali spremembo mednarodnega sporazuma ali finančnega protokola s strani Evropske skupnosti z enim samim glasovanjem z večino oddanih glasov, pri čemer niso dopustne spremembe besedila sporazuma ali protokola.“
'Parliament shall give its opinion on, or its assent to, the conclusion, renewal or amendment of an international agreement or a financial protocol concluded by the European Community in a single vote by a majority of the votes cast without amendments to the text of the agreement or protocol being admissible.'
Protokol je bil podpisan 31. marca 2009 v Bruslju.
The protocol in question was signed in Brussels on 31 March 2009.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega in ob upoštevanju tehnične narave zadevnega dokumenta poročevalec predlaga, da odbor TRAN poda pozitivno mnenje o sklenitvi protokola.
On the basis of the above and taking account of the technical nature of the document in question, your rapporteur proposes that the TRAN Committee deliver a favourable opinion on the conclusion of this protocol.
Pomorski promet med ES Kitajsko
Maritime transport between the EC and China
o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 6/2009 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, Oddelek III – Komisija
on Draft amending budget No 6/2009 of the European Union for the financial year 2009, Section III – Commission
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2009 za proračunsko leto 2009, ki ga je Komisija predložila dne 18. junija 2009 ( KOM(2009)0288 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 6/2009 of the European Union for the financial year 2009, which the Commission presented on 18 June 2009 ( COM(2009)0288 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe proračuna št. 6/2009, ki ga je Svet pripravil dne 13. julija 2009 (11888/2009 – C7‑0098/2009 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 6/2009, which the Council established on 13 July 2009 (11888/2009) – C7‑0098/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 75 in Priloge V svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 75 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7‑0003/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7‑0003/2009 ),
A. ker predhodni predlog spremembe proračuna št. 6/2009 zajema popravek napovedi tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev ter osnov za DDV in BND, vključitev ustreznih popravkov za Združeno kraljestvo in njihovega financiranja v proračun ter popravek financiranja znižanj iz naslova BND za Nizozemsko in Švedsko za leto 2009,
A. whereas the Preliminary draft amending budget No 6 to the budget for 2009 covers the revision of the forecast of Traditional Own Resources, VAT and GNI bases, the budgeting of the relevant UK corrections as well as their financing and the revision of financing of GNI reductions in favour of the Netherlands and Sweden in 2009,
B. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 6/2009 uradna vključitev teh proračunskih sprememb v proračun za leto 2009,
B. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 6/2009 is to formally enter these budgetary adjustments into the 2009 budget,
Predhodni predlog spremembe proračuna št. 6 k proračunu za leto 2009 (PPSP št. 6/2009) zajema popravek napovedi tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev (TLS, tj. carin in prelevmanov na sladkor) ter osnov za DDV in BND, vključitev ustreznih popravkov za Združeno kraljestvo in njihovega financiranja v proračun ter popravek financiranja znižanj iz naslova BND za Nizozemsko in Švedsko za leto 2009, kar bo spremenilo porazdelitev prispevkov iz lastnih sredstev v proračun EU med državami članicami.
The Preliminary Draft Amending Budget No 6 to the Budget for 2009 (PDAB 6/2009) covers the revision of the forecast of Traditional Own Resources (TOR, i.e. customs duties and sugar levies), VAT and GNI bases, the budgeting of the relevant UK corrections as well as their financing and revision of financing of GNI reductions in favour of the Netherlands and Sweden in 2009, resulting in a change in the distribution between Member States of their own resources contributions to the EU budget.
Popravek napovedi tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev ter osnov za DDV in BND je predvsem tehničen in temelji na osnovi nedavnih gospodarskih napovedih, ki so bile sprejete na seji Svetovalnega odbora za lastna sredstva.
The revision of the forecast of Traditional Own Resources, VAT and GNI basis is eminently technical and provides readjustments based on more recent economic forecasts, adopted at a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Own Resources.
Popravek proračunskih neravnovesij v korist Združenega kraljestva (popravek za Združeno kraljestvo), ki se vključi v PPSP št. 6/2009, zadeva leti 2005 in 2008.
The correction of budgetary imbalances in favour of the United Kingdom (UK correction), to be budgeted in the PDAB 6/2009, concerns years 2005 and 2008.
Ker je treba popravek za Združeno kraljestvo za določeno leto financirati naslednje leto, pri financiranju tega popravka za leto 2008 sodeluje vseh 27 držav članic.
As the UK correction of a certain year is to be financed in the following year, all 27 Member States participate in the financing of the 2008 UK correction.
Financiranje popravka za Združeno kraljestvo za leto 2005 pa zadeva samo tistih 25 držav, ki so bile države članice leta 2006.
The financing of the 2005 UK correction does, however, only concern the 25 countries that were Member States in 2006.
Bruto znižanje plačil iz BND za Nizozemsko in Švedsko za leto 2009 je bilo določeno v SP št. 3/2009.
The gross reductions in the GNI payments of the Netherlands and Sweden for 2009 were established in AB 3/2009.
Ti zneski so bili prilagojeni sedanjim cenam z uporabo deflatorja BDP za EU, izraženega v EUR, ki ga je določila Komisija v spomladanskih gospodarskih napovedih leta 2008, kar pomeni, da so bile na voljo ob pripravi predhodnega predloga proračuna za leto 2009.
The amounts were adjusted to current prices by applying the GDP deflator for the EU expressed in EUR, as provided by the Commission in the 2008 Spring Economic Forecast, i.e. that were available when the preliminary draft budget 2009 was drawn up.