natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Obveznosti kreditnih institucij in drugih institucij, ki opravljajo razvrščanje in distribucijo eurobankovcev in eurokovancev, je treba razlikovati od obveznosti institucij, od katerih je mogoče zahtevati le, naj ravnajo z vso potrebno skrbnostjo – to je primer malih in srednje velikih trgovcev, ki si ne bi mogli privoščiti stroška nakupa naprav za preverjanje.
The obligations incumbent upon credit institutions and other institutions engaged in the sorting and distribution of euro notes and coins must be distinguished from the obligations incumbent upon institutions which can only be required to act with due diligence - this being the case with small and medium-sized traders, who could not afford the expense of acquiring testing machines.
Poleg tega je treba oblikovati postopek preverjanja v državah članicah, ki sprejemajo euro kot valuto za transakcije, čeprav same niso v območju eura.
Furthermore, a verification procedure must be established in the Member States which, although they do not belong to the euro area, nonetheless accept euros as a transaction currency.
Prevozniki denarja morajo preveriti pristnost prevzetega denarja samo, če imajo do njega neposreden dostop, da ne bi dodatno zapletli postopkov v njihovi dejavnosti na ravni Skupnosti.
Cash transporters will not be required to verify the authenticity of the money they transport unless they have direct access thereto, in order to avoid a procedural complication of their activity at Community level.
Postopki, ki so povezani s prevozom denarja, pogosto določajo, da se gotovina prevaža med nacionalnimi bankami in bančnimi podružnicami v zavarovanih blagajnah, ki jih prevozniki ne morejo odpreti.
Cash-transport procedures often involve the transfer of cash between national banks and the branches of individual banks in sealed boxes which the transporters are unable to open.
Treba je pojasniti, da mora ECB za izpolnjevanje svoje pristojnosti glede izdajanja bankovcev zagotoviti celovitost in ohranjanje eurobankovcev v obtoku in s tem zaupanje javnosti v eurobankovce.
It should be made clear that, in order to fulfil its mandate concerning the issuance of banknotes, the ECB needs to ensure the integrity and preservation of euro banknotes in circulation and, accordingly, the public's trust in euro banknotes.
Sama možnost izdajanja priporočila Komisiji bi v tej povezavi resno ogrozila neodvisnost ECB.
The mere possibility of issuing a recommendation to the Commission would seriously undermine the independence of the ECB in this regard.
Člen 1 – točka 3 – točka b
Article 1 – point 3 – point b
„Z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka odstavka 3 se zakoni, uredbe in upravne določbe za uporabo prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 tega člena sprejmejo najpozneje do 31. decembra 2009 .
“By way of derogation from the first subparagraph of paragraph 3, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions for applying the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted by 31 December 2009 at the latest.
Države članice o tem nemudoma obvestijo Komisijo in Evropsko centralno banko.“
They shall forthwith inform the Commission and the European Central Bank thereof.”
„Z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka odstavka 3 se zakoni, uredbe in upravne določbe za uporabo prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 tega člena sprejmejo najpozneje do 31. decembra 2011 .
“By way of derogation from the first subparagraph of paragraph 3, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions for applying the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted by 31 December 2011 at the latest.
Določiti je treba rok, v katerem bodo morale vse države članice izpolnjevati določbe te uredbe.
A deadline must be set within which all the Member States will be required to comply with the provisions of this Regulation.
Rok, ki ga je sprva predlagala Komisija, državam članicam pušča malo manevrskega prostora za pravočasno sprejetje postopkov preverjanja, ki sta jih določili Evropska centralna banka in Komisija.
The deadline initially proposed by the Commission leaves the Member States little scope for adopting in good time the verification procedures laid down by the ECB and the Commission itself .
Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – alinea 3 a (novo)
Article 7 - paragraph 2 - indent 3 a (new)
(3a) V odstavek 2 člena 7 se vstavi naslednja točka:
(3a) The following indent shall be added to Article 7(2):
„– oblikovanju in spodbujanju izobraževalnih in informativnih dejavnosti (informativnih brošur, izobraževalnih seminarjev), ki so namenjene državljanom in potrošnikom, o nevarnostih v zvezi s ponarejanjem denarja, osnovnih zaščitnih elementih na eurobankovcih in eurokovancih ter pristojnih organih, ki jih je treba obvestiti v primeru posedovanja bankovcev in/ali kovancev, ki bi lahko bili ponarejeni.
"- devising and promoting training and information activities (information booklets, training seminars) for citizens and consumers concerning the risks posed by counterfeiting, the basic security measures incorporated into euro notes and coins and the appropriate authorities to be contacted by those who come into possession of suspected counterfeit notes and/or coins.
Poleg tega finančne institucije in katere koli druge ustanove, ki opravljajo razvrščanje bankovcev in kovancev ter njihovo distribucijo v javnosti kot poklicno dejavnost, vključno z ustanovami, katerih dejavnost vključuje menjavo bankovcev in kovancev različnih valut, kot so menjalnice, javno razstavijo informativne brošure (ki jih priskrbijo pristojni nacionalni organi, Evropska komisija in Evropska centralna banka) o nevarnostih, ukrepih in navedenih organih, ki so potrošnikom na razpolago.“
Furthermore, financial institutions and any other institution involved in the sorting and distribution to the public of notes and coins as a professional activity (including establishments whose activity consists in exchanging notes and coins of different currencies, such as bureaux de change) shall display and make available to consumers information booklets (supplied by the relevant national authorities, the Commission and the European Central Bank) dealing with the above-mentioned risks, measures and authorities"
Zaščita eura ima dve razsežnosti: politično in finančno.
Protection of the euro has a dual dimension: political and financial.
Finančna razsežnost je očitna, vendar ima tista politična nemara pomembnejšo vlogo.
The financial dimension is obvious but the political one perhaps plays a more significant role.
Euro je treba zaščititi kot enega izmed simbolov evropske identitete.
As one of the symbols of European identity, the euro needs to be protected.
Ukrepi, potrebni za zaščito eurobankovcev in eurokovancev pred ponarejanjem, so določeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1338/2001 z dne 28. junija 2001.
The measures required in order to protect euro notes and coins against counterfeiting are laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 of 28 June 2001.
V tej uredbi se predlaga, da bi morale kreditne institucije in druge ustanove, ki opravljajo razvrščanje gotovine in njeno distribucijo v javnosti, iz obtoka umakniti vse eurobankovce in eurokovance za katere vedo ali imajo zadostne razloge, da domnevajo, da so ponarejeni, pri tem pa ni navedena poprejšnja in nujna naloga odkrivanja in prepoznavanja.
In that Regulation it is proposed that credit institutions and other establishments involved in the sorting and distribution to the public of cash should withdraw from circulation any euro notes or coins which they know or have sufficient reason to believe to be counterfeit, although no reference is made to the prior and necessary task of detection and identification.
Z drugimi besedami, uredba nalaga implicitno obveznost (namreč, ravnanje z vso potrebno skrbnostjo), ne pa neposredne obveznosti opravljanja preverjanj.
In other words the Regulation imposes an implicit obligation (namely, to act with ‘due diligence’) but not a direct obligation to carry out checks.
Odsotnost navedbe o nalogi prepoznavanja je mogoče pripisati dejstvu, da v tistem času ni obstajal dogovor o tem, kateri so najučinkovitejši načini za prepoznavanje ponarejenih bankovcev in kovancev v velikem obsegu.
The lack of reference to identification tasks is attributable to the fact that, at the time, there was no agreement on what were the most effective methods for the large-scale identification of false notes and coins.
Sedaj, ko sta Komisija in Evropska centralna banka dokončno določili postopke za prepoznavanje ponarejenih eurobankovcev in eurokovancev, imajo ustanove, ki opravljajo distribucijo gotovine v javnosti, potrebna orodja za izvajanje naloge prepoznavanja pristnosti bankovcev in kovancev, katere dajejo v obtok – zaradi tega je predlog spremembe uredbe 1338/2001 utemeljen.
Now that the Commission and the European Central Bank have laid down the definitive procedures for the detection of false euro notes and coins, establishments involved in the distribution of cash to the public have the tools they need in order to perform the task of authentifying the notes and coins which they put into circulation - the reason which justifies the amendment made to Regulation 1338/2001.
Ta predlog spremembe bi moral med drugim omogočiti razlikovanje med različnimi vrstami ustanov, ki dajejo v obtok našo skupno valuto.
Amongst other things that amendment should enable the necessary distinction to be made between the various types of establishment which place our common currency into circulation.
Na eni strani gre za velike kreditne, finančne, gospodarske in trgovinske organizacije ter organizacije za prevoz denarja, za katere bi veljala neposredna obveznost, da opravljajo preverjanje pristnosti.
On the one hand there are the major credit, financial, economic, commercial and cash-transport organisations to which the direct obligation to carry out authentification would apply.
V posebnem primeru velikih nakupovalnih središč bi zahteva po opravljanju preverjanja pristnosti preprečila, da večina središč prek svojih bankomatov daje v obtok bankovce in kovance, ki niso bili preverjeni in zato utegnejo biti ponarejeni.
In the particular case of large shopping complexes the requirement to carry out authentification would prevent most complexes from distributing via their automatic cash dispensers notes and coins which have not been checked and may as a consequence be false.
Na drugi strani bi bili mali trgovci, od katerih bi zaradi očitnih razlogov zahtevali le, naj ravnajo z vso potrebno skrbnostjo – tj., da umaknejo iz obtoka vse eurobankovce in eurokovance, za katere vedo ali imajo zadostne razloge, da domnevajo, da so ponarejeni .
On the other hand there would be small traders who for obvious reasons would be required only to proceed with ‘due diligence ’ - i.e. to withdraw any euro notes and coins which they know or have sufficient reason to believe to be counterfeit .
Odtod bo treba izpeljati opredelitev ustanov, za katere bo veljala obveznost preverjanja pristnosti eurobankovcev in eurokovancev, ki jih dajejo javnosti.
Hence a definition of the establishments which will be obliged to check the authenticity of the euro note and coins which they deliver to the public will have to drawn up.
Postopki za prepoznavanje in ugotavljanje pristnosti bankovcev in kovancev se izvajajo z opremo, ki jo je treba kalibrirati in prilagajati z uporabo tako ponarejenih kot pristnih primerkov eura.
Procedures for the detection and authentification of notes and coins are carried out by means of equipment which has to be calibrated and adjusted through the use of both false and genuine examples of euros.
Če naj se nadzornim središčem dostavljajo primerki ponarejenih eurov, mora biti omogočen prenos teh primerkov med pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi ter med institucijami in organi Evropske unije.
If control centres are to be supplied with examples of false euros, it must be possible for those examples to be transported between the competent national authorities and between EU bodies and institutions.
Za kalibracijo opreme za preverjanje pristnosti in odkrivanje ponaredkov je treba pristojnim nacionalnim organom predati ustrezno število primerkov ponarejenih eurov (tudi v primerih, ko ti predstavljajo dokazno gradivo v kazenskih postopkih), pod pogojem, da zasežena količina bankovcev in kovancev to dovoljuje.
For the purpose of calibrating authentification and detection equipment, an adequate number of examples of false euros (even when these constitute evidence in criminal procedures) must be delivered to the competent national authorities, provided that the quantity of notes and coins seized so permits.
To je zapleten predlog zaradi dejstva, da zakonodaja o kazenskem postopku v večini držav članic določa, da mora biti vse dokazno gradivo, povezano s kazenskim postopkom, na voljo ves čas trajanja tega postopka.
This is a complex proposal owing to the fact that under most of the Member States’ laws on criminal prosecution, all the evidence relating to criminal proceedings must be available for the entire duration of those proceedings.
Zato je treba oblikovati mehanizem, ki bo pravosodnim organom omogočal, da dostavijo ustrezno število ponarejenih eurobankovcev in eurokovancev organom za preverjanje pristnosti, ne da bi porušili ravnotežje med izpolnjevanjem temeljnih pravnih/postopkovnih načel ter tehničnimi zahtevami, povezanimi z odkrivanjem ponarejene valute.
Hence a mechanism must be devised which will enable the judicial authorities to supply an adequate number of false euro notes and coins to the verification authorities without destroying the balance between the observance of basic legal/procedural principles and the technical requirements relating to the detection of counterfeit currency.
Še posebej pomembno je vprašanje zagotavljanja pristnosti eura po celotni EU, zlasti v državah članicah, ki niso v območju eura, vendar za transakcijske namene sprejemajo skupno valuto.
A matter of particular importance is the question of guaranteeing the authenticity of the euro throughout the EU, particularly in the Member States which do not belong to the euro area but which accept the single currency for transaction purposes.
Temeljito bi bilo treba razmisliti o sklicevanju Evropske centralne banke na časovni okvir, v katerem bi države članice morale izvršiti obveznost po ugotavljanju pristnosti.
Much thought should be given to the ECB’s reference to the timescales within which the Member States must enforce the authentification requirement.
S stališča Evropske centralne banke bi bilo treba časovni okvir določiti v skladu s postopki, ki jih podrobneje opredelita Komisija in sama banka, saj sta ti dve instituciji odgovorni za pravila za razvrščanje, ki se nanašajo tako na preverjanje ustreznosti kot na preverjanje pristnosti valute.
From the ECB’s point of view the timescales should be laid down in accordance with the procedures specified by the Commission and the ECB itself, since those two institutions are responsible for the classification rules relating both to suitability checks and to the checks on currency authenticity.
Predlog Evropske centralne banke pa bi bilo mogoče uporabljati le v državah območja eura in ne v drugih državah članicah, v katerih euro ni uradna valuta.
However, the ECB proposal would be applicable only in the euro area countries and not in the other Member States in which the euro is not the official currency.
Preverjanje pristnosti bi se v primeru držav članic, ki niso prevzele skupne valute, lahko opravljalo (I) z uporabo ustanov z opremo za preverjanje, ki lahko prepozna ponaredke pri izbiranju bankovcev in kovancev, ter (II) z zagotavljanjem primernega usposabljanja za blagajniško osebje.
In the case of Member States which have not adopted the single currency, authenticity checks could be carried out (I) through the use by establishments of tested equipment capable of detecting counterfeits when notes and coins are being selected and (II) by providing suitable training for cashiers.
Zaradi tega in da se zagotovi učinkovitost nadzornih mehanizmov je še posebej pomembno, da uredba vsebuje določen datum, s katerim bi se začeli uporabljati postopki preverjanja pristnosti izven območja eura.
For this reason and in order to ensure that control mechanisms are effective, it is particularly important that the Regulation should contain a specific date with effect from which authentification procedures will be applied outside the euro area.
Nazadnje bo treba revidirati nekatere jezikovne različice predloga uredbe Sveta, saj – vsaj pri španski različici – predlagani predlog spremembe naslova člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1338/2001 vključuje spremembo izvirnega naslova „Obveznost prenosa ponarejenih kovancev za prepoznavanje“ v „Obveznost prenosa ponarejenih bankovcev“ , dejansko pa bi bilo treba naslov spremeniti v „Obveznost prenosa ponarejenih kovancev“ .
Lastly, the various language versions of the proposal for a Council Regulation will have to be revised, since - at least in the Spanish version - the proposed amendment to the title of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) 1338/2001 involves changing the original title ‘ Obligation to transmit counterfeit coins for identification ’ to ‘ Obligation to transmit counterfeit notes ’, when in fact the title should be changed to ‘ Obligation to transmit counterfeit coins ’.
V letu 2007 je skupno število ponarejenih bankovcev, ki so bili umaknjeni iz obtoka, znašalo 561.000, medtem ko je število umaknjenih ponarejenih kovancev znašalo 211.100.
In 2007, the total number of counterfeit banknotes withdrawn from circulation was 561,000, while the number of counterfeit coins removed from circulation was 211,100.
Te številke so v primerjavi s skupnim številom pristnih bankovcev in kovancev eura, ki so v obtoku (prvih je 11,4 milijarde, drugih pa 75 milijard), nizke.
These numbers are marginal compared to the total number of genuine euro banknotes and coins in circulation (11.4 billion and 75 billion respectively).
Velika večina (96 %) ponarejenih bankovcev, ki so bili vzeti iz obtoka v drugi polovici leta 2007, je bila odkritih v državah območja eura (približno 3,5 % jih je bilo najdenih v državah članicah EU, ki niso v območju eura, 0,5 % pa v drugih delih sveta).
The overwhelming majority (96%) of counterfeit banknotes recovered in the second half of 2007 were found in euro area countries (approximately 3.5% in EU Member States outside the euro area, around 0.5% in other parts of the world).
Vzporedna uredba (1339/2001), ki temeljni na členu 308 pogodbe o ES, pa razširja določbe uredbe 1338/2001 na države članice, ki eura kot enotne valute niso uvedle.
A parallel regulation (1339/2001), based on Article 308 of the EC Treaty, extends the provisions of the regulation 1338/2001 to those Member States which have not adopted the euro as a single currency.
Uredba 1338/2001 poskuša zagotoviti visoko raven zaščite pred prenarejanjem in ponarejanjem.
Regulation 1338/2001 aims to ensure a high level of protection against counterfeiting and falsification.
Vključuje obdelavo tehničnih in statističnih podatkov v zvezi s ponarejenimi bankovci in kovanci (načini in tehnične lastnosti postopka izdelave, zasežene količine itd.), obdelavo operativnih in strateških podatkov ter sodelovanje in medsebojno pomoč med državami članicami EU, organi in institucijami, tretjimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami (še zlasti Europolom).
It covers the processing of technical and statistical information relating to counterfeit notes and coins (methods and technical features of the manufacturing process, amounts seized etc.), the processing of operational and strategic data, and co-operation and mutual assistance between the EU Member States, bodies and institutions, third countries and international organisations (Europol in particular).
V skladu s pogoji te uredbe morajo kreditne institucije in vse druge institucije, ki opravljajo razvrščanje bankovcev in kovancev ter njihovo distribucijo , iz obtoka umakniti vse eurobankovce in eurokovance, ki so jih prejele in za katere vedo ali imajo zadostne razloge, da domnevajo, da so ponarejeni.
Under the terms of the regulation, credit institutions, and any other institution engaged in the sorting and distribution to the public of notes and coins, shall be obliged to withdraw from circulation all euro notes and coins received by them which they know or have sufficient reason to believe to be counterfeit.
Bankovce in kovance takoj predajo pristojnim nacionalnim organom.
They shall immediately hand them over to the competent national authorities.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovi, da za ustanove, ki ne izpolnjujejo svojih obveznosti, veljajo učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne sankcije.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the establishments which fail to discharge their obligations shall be subject to effective, proportionate and deterrent sanctions.
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1338/2001 o določitvi ukrepov, potrebnih za zaščito eura pred ponarejanjem (KOM(2007)525)
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (COM(2007)525)
Predlog za spremembo uredbe 1338/2001 vključuje:
The proposal to amend Regulation 1338/2001 comprises
– posebno dovoljenje za prevoz ponarejenih eurobankovcev (člen 4) in eurokovancev (člen 5) zaradi prilagoditev opreme, ki se uporablja za preverjanje pristnosti, saj za to na ravni EU sedaj ni pooblastil;
- a specific permission to transport counterfeit euro notes (Article 4) and coins (Article 5) for the purpose of adjustment of the equipment used for authenticity checks, as this is presently not authorised at EU level;
– črtanje obveznosti Evropskega tehničnega in znanstvenega centra (ETSC), da posreduje podatke Komisije, saj je ETSC, ki je začasno izvrševal svoje naloge v francoski kovnici, sedaj dokončno vzpostavljen znotraj urada Komisije za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) (člen 5);
- a deletion of the obligation of the European Technical and Scientific Centre (ETSC) to communicate data to the Commission, as the ETSC, which had been carrying out its task on a temporary basis at the French Mint, is now permanently established within the Commission's Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) (Article 5);
– izrecno obveznost kreditnih ustanov in drugih zadevnih ustanov, da preverjajo pristnost eurobankovcev in eurokovancev, ki so jih prejele in dale ponovno v obtok, v skladu s postopki za eurobankovce, ki jih je določila ECB, in postopki za eurokovance, ki jih je določila Komisija (člen 6).
- an explicit obligation for credit and other relevant institutions to check the authenticity of euro notes and coins which they have received and put back into circulation, in line with procedures defined by the ECB for notes and the Commission for coins (Article 6).
Ta zahteva je bila vključena že v prvotni predlog Komisije za uredbo 1338/2001, vendar na koncu ni bila sprejeta, predvsem zaradi pomanjkanja dogovorjenih enotnih in učinkovitih načinov za preverjanje ponaredb.
Such an obligation had been already included in the initial Commission proposal for Regulation 1338/2001, but was finally not adopted mainly due to the lack of agreed uniform and effective methods for the detection of counterfeits.
Določbe, ki določajo predlagane obveznosti, morajo biti sprejete najkasneje do 31. decembra 2009, da bi kreditnim in drugim zadevnim ustanovam omogočili prilagoditev njihovih notranjih postopkov in posodobitev opreme.
The provisions that impose the proposed obligations shall be adopted by 31 December 2009 at the latest, in order to allow the credit and other relevant institutions to adapt their internal proceedings and upgrade their equipment.
Člen 106(1) pogodbe dodeljuje pristojnost za opredelitev takih standardov za eurobankovce Evropski centralni banki.
Article 106(1) of the Treaty assigns competence to define such standards for euro notes to the European Central Bank.
Glede eurokovancev je podobne pristojnosti na podlagi člena 211 pogodbe dobila Komisija.
With regard to euro coins, related competences have been conferred on the Commission pursuant to Article 211 of the Treaty.
Člen 1 – odstavek 3 – točka a
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point a