natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročevalec pozdravlja prizadevanja za poenostavitev na tem področju.
The rapporteur welcomes the efforts at simplification which have been made in this area.
Za pravilno ovrednotenje dejavnikov dela in zaposlitve predlaga, da se varnost pri delu doda med že določene predpisane zahteve na področju upravljanja.
For the purpose of giving adequate prominence to the Work and Employment factors the rapporteur considers that Safety at Work should be added to the legal management requirements which have already been laid down.
Modulacija je utemeljena kot finančni instrument drugega stebra.
Modulation is justifiable as a second-pillar financing instrument.
Postopna modulacija je popolnoma utemeljena v primeru, da morajo največji prejemniki tudi največ prispevati k temu cilju.
Progressive modulation is also fully justified on the grounds that it is right that the beneficiaries who receive most should contribute most to that objective.
Zaradi enakih razlogov je treba ohraniti izvzetje za zneske manjše ali enake 5 000 EUR, pri čemer se uporaba tega ukrepa oprosti pri mnogih malih prejemnikih (več kot 80 % vseh prejemnikov).
For the same reasons it is justified that EUR 5000 should be retained and that a large number of small beneficiaries (over 80% of the total number thereof) should be exempted from application of this measure.
Kljub temu, da je poročevalec naklonjen višji stopnji modulacije, priznava, da je treba upoštevati sklep Evropskega parlamenta, sprejet marca 2008 v Goepelovem poročilu (5 % obvezne modulacije za vse prejemnike zneskov večjih od 5 000 EUR, dodaten 1 % za zneske med 10 000 EUR in 99 999 EUR, dodatna 2 % za zneske od 100 000 EUR do 199 999 EUR, dodatne 3 % za zneske od 200 000 EUR do 299 999 EUR ter dodatne 4 % za zneske 300 000 EUR in več).
Despite the fact that the rapporteur is personally in favour of a higher modulation percentage, he considers that he should abide by the decision approved by Parliament in March 2008 in connection with the Goepel report (5% of compulsory modulation for all beneficiaries above EUR 5000 + 1% for those between EUR 10 000 and EUR 99 999, + 2% for the EUR 100 000-199 999 bracket, + 3% for the EUR 200 000-299 999 bracket and + 4% for amounts in excess of EUR 300 000).
Poleg tega ni smiselno predlagati, da se ta ukrep uporablja za nove države članice, saj so te do leta 2013 v prehodnem obdobju glede plačil iz prvega stebra.
Furthermore, he does not consider that application of this measure to the new Member States should be proposed, on the grounds that until 2013 they will be in a phasing-in period as regards first-pillar payments.
V zvezi s prerazporeditvijo (predpis 80–20) nič ne opravičuje uporabe drugačnega pravila za zneske, določene z novo shemo postopne modulacije, od tistega, ki velja za obvezno modulacijo.
As regards redistribution (Rule 80-20), it is not considered justifiable that the amounts governed by the new progressive modulation should be subject to a different rule from the one which is already applied to compulsory modulation.
c) Omejevanje ali zgornja meja
(c) Maximum ceiling
Da bi se nadomestilo zmanjšanje prenosov finančnih sredstev v drugi steber zaradi predlaganih nizkih stopenj modulacije ter da bi bil postopek enak za vse in pravičen, je treba določiti zgornjo mejo za dodeljevanje neposrednih pomoči na znesek 500 000 EUR.
In order to compensate for the reduction in the transfer of financial resources to the second pillar (which stems from the low rates of modulation proposed) and for reasons of fairness and justice, it is considered that a ceiling for the allocation of direct aid should be set at EUR 500 000.
Ob upoštevanju pomena, ki se ga namerava dodeliti zaposlovanju na kmetijah in podeželju, ter pomembne vloge, ki jo imajo na tem področju številna kmetijska podjetja in zlasti zadruge, poročevalec predlaga, da se zgornja meja, uporabljena za vsakega od teh velikih prejemnikov, določi na 500 000 EUR, doda pa se jim še splošni znesek, letno namenjen za plače.
In view of the boost which is to be given to agricultural and rural employment and the important role which many agricultural businesses play in this area (in particular cooperatives), it is proposed that the maximum ceiling to be applied to each of these major beneficiaries should be EUR 500 000, increased by the total amount spent each year on wages.
Poročevalec ob upoštevanju zelo neenake razporeditve teh velikih prejemnikov v različnih državah članicah predlaga, da se zneski, pridobljeni s prej omenjenim ukrepom, dodelijo zadevni državi članici.
In view of the fact that these major beneficiaries are very unevenly distributed amongst the Member States, it is proposed that the amounts stemming from this measure should be paid to the Member State concerned.
d) Spodnje meje
(d) Minimum limits
Komisija predlaga uvedbo spodnje meje 250 EUR na leto ali 1 ha, nad katero mali kmetje ne bodo mogli prejeti neposrednih pomoči zaradi visokih stroškov in zapletenih upravnih postopkov v zvezi z obravnavo pomoči.
The Commission is proposing to establish a minimum limit of EUR 250 per year or of one hectare, under which small farmers will be prevented from receiving direct support on account of the high cost and the bureaucracy associated with the processing of support.
Po mnenju poročevalca ta predlog kaže na veliko socialno neobčutljivost in bi, če bi obveljal, povzročil nasprotovanje številnih kmetov pa tudi izničil koristne učinke njihovega prispevka.
In the rapporteur’s view, such a proposal reveals a woeful lack of social sensitivity.
Te kmete je treba obravnavati kot zaveznike ter jih ne podcenjevati pri izpolnjevanju ciljev izvajanja dobrih kmetijskih praks in praks za varovanje okolja.
If it were to be applied it would contribute not only to turning many farmers against the CAP, it would also cancel out the positive effects of the contribution made by those farmers (allies who should not be underestimated for the purpose of achieving the objectives of applying good agricultural and environmental practices).
Treba je poudariti, da štejejo kmetje, ki prejemajo do 250 EUR, skoraj 31 % celotnega prebivalstva, ki prejema le 0,84 % plačil.
It should be borne in mind that farmers who receive up to EUR 250 represent nearly 31% of the total but receive a mere 0.84% of payments.
Zato poročevalec predlaga, naj se zavrne predlog Komisije.
On these grounds the rapporteur is recommending rejection of the Commission proposal.
Kljub temu se strinja z razlogi za zmanjšanje zapletenih upravnih postopkov v zvezi z izplačili teh pomoči ter predlaga, da se zneski, ki so enaki ali nižji od 500 EUR na leto, lahko izplačajo vsake dve leti s plačilom v prvem letu.
However, being sensitive to the arguments relating to the need for the bureaucracy associated with the payment of such aid to be reduced, the rapporteur is proposing that amounts of EUR 500 per year or less may be paid every two years, starting in the first year.
e) Dodatna plačila (člen 68)
(e) Additional payments (Article 68)
Da bi se v največji meri izkoristile možnosti, ki jih ponuja ta instrument, poročevalec predlaga:
With a view to making better use of the potential offered by this policy instrument, the rapporteur is proposing;
– razveljavitev financiranja, predvidenega za sistem za upravljanje tveganj in kriz v okviru člena 68, kar bo povečalo finančne zmožnosti za druge predvidene ukrepe;
- to withdraw funding for the Article 68 system for risk- and crisis-management, thereby releasing more funding for the other measures envisaged;
– uvedbo novega člena 68a, ki bo državam članicam omogočal uporabo do 5 % zneskov, ki presegajo njihove nacionalne zgornje meje, za financiranje zavarovanja letine in vzajemnih skladov, ter posledično omogočal ustrezno financiranje sistema upravljanja tveganj in kriz; glede vprašanj v zvezi z upravljanjem in organiziranjem trgov je treba te instrumente za delovanje vključiti le v okvir Svetovne trgovinske organizacije in ne v predpise za sheme neposredne pomoči kmetom;
- to create a new Article 68a allowing the Member States to use up to 5% of their national ceilings in order to finance crop insurance and mutual funds, so as to ensure that the risk and crisis system is adequately funded; since these are matters relating to the management and organisation of markets, these instruments should be brought into use within the single COM and not in the framework of the rules relating to schemes providing direct support for farmers;
– prenos neporabljenih zneskov iz členov 68 in 68a v drugi steber za tiste države članice, ki to želijo, ter njihova poraba za okrepitev programov za razvoj podeželja brez sofinanciranja, da bi se tako nadomestilo zmanjšanje zneskov, prenesenih v drugi steber, zaradi znižanja stopnje modulacije, ki se predlaga kot nadomestna rešitev predloga Komisije;
- to allow the possibility (for Member States which so desire) to transfer unused amounts relating to Articles 68 and 68a to the second pillar, in which case the Member States would be able to use those amounts (without resorting to co-financing) in order to strengthen their rural-development programmes, thereby compensating for the reduction in transfers to the second pillar which stems from the reduction in the modulation rate proposed as an alternative to the Commission proposal;
– ukinitev zgornje meje 2,5 %, ki se bo lahko določila pozneje in nepristransko na podlagi predlogov, sprejetih v tem sklopu in v skladu s klavzulo „de minimis“ in „zeleno škatlo“ iz kmetijskega sporazuma, h kateremu se je zavezala EU pri Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji, ter ob upoštevanju mandata kroga pogajanj iz Dohe.
- to abolish the 2.5% ceiling which will subsequently be determined objectively on the basis of the proposals adopted in this context and in accordance with the de minimis clause and the Agricultural Agreement’s ‘blue’ box, as accepted by the EU within the WTO and in accordance with the Doha negotiating mandate.
f) Nevezana podpora
(f) Decoupled aid
Poročevalec pozdravlja predlog Komisije o postopnem uvajanju osnovnih ozemeljskih meril za dodelitev pomoči kmetom.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal concerning the progressive introduction of land-based criteria for the allocation of aid to farmers.
Vendar se zaveda, da je (ob upoštevanju dejstva, da priložnost za obsežnejšo razpravo o vprašanju ni več aktualna) prilagodljivost, dodeljena državam članicam, sicer možna rešitev, vendar lahko povzroči uvedbo tudi do 27 različnih modelov.
However, he is also aware that, since the opportunity for a more detailed debate on the topic has been wasted, the flexibility granted to the Member States is a possible solution but one which will ultimately result in 27 different models.
Ob upoštevanju sedanjega stanja na trgih, zlasti njegovih posledic na vzrejo, bi bilo treba:
Given the current state of the markets and in particular the implications thereof as regards farm production, the following action should be taken:
– ohraniti vezano pomoč, zlasti pri zakolu telet;
- in the case of the slaughter of calves, coupled aid should be maintained
– omogočiti ohranitev vezane pomoči do razmerja 100 % za sektorja ovčjereje in kozjereje;
- in the case of the sheep and goat sector, retaining up to 100% coupled aid should be permitted;
– ohraniti vezano pomoč za suho krmo in beljakovinske rastline za kulture, ki so neposredno namenjene za živinorejo, ter da bi se spodbudila ponudba krmil v gospodarskih razmerah, ki jih zaznamujejo veliko povpraševanje in visoke cene;
- for crops more closely related to animal production and in order to encourage a greater supply of animal feed against a background of high demand and high prices, coupled aid for dry forage and protein crops should be maintained;
– ohraniti veljavno shemo do leta 2012/2013 za majhne skupne ureditve trgov;
- for small COMs the current scheme should remain in force until 2012/2013;
– ohraniti veljavno shemo do leta 2012/2013 za tobak v skladu s sklepom, ki ga je večinsko sprejel Evropski parlament.
- in the case of tobacco and in accordance with the European Parliament’s majority decision, the current scheme should remain in force until 2012/2013.
Uredba Sveta o spremembah skupne kmetijske politike s spremembo uredb (ES) št. 320/2006, (ES) št. 1234/2007, (ES) št. 3/2008 in (ES) št. […]/2008
COUNCIL REGULATION ON MODIFICATIONS TO THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY BY AMENDING REGULATIONS (EC) NO 320/2006, (EC) NO 1234/2007, (EC) NO 3/2008 AND (EC) NO […]/2008
a) Upravljanje tveganj in kriz
(a) Risk- and crisis-management
Kljub velikemu pomenu sistema upravljanja tveganj in kriz, ki ga predlaga Komisija, ter njegovemu preprečevanju tveganj na ravni posameznih primerov in dejstvu, da je oblikovan na osnovi zavarovanja letine in vzajemnih skladov, ta sistem ni sposoben nuditi rešitev za velike sistemske krize, kot so nekatere od tistih, s katerimi smo se soočali v bližnji preteklosti, na primer za pojav bolezni norih krav.
The risk and crisis scheme proposed by the Commission on the basis of crop insurance and mutual funds is important on account of its preventive nature in response to individual risks but it is insufficient as a response to major systemic crises such as some which have occurred in the recent past (BSE, for example).
Zato se predlaga ohranitev člena 44.
Consequently it is proposed that Article 44 should remain.
Predlaga se tudi povišanje finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za 70 % (+ 30 % zneska, ki ga predlagajo stare države članice) za nove države članice, ki so v prehodnem obdobju in se soočajo s težavami sofinanciranja sistema upravljanja tveganj in kriz.
It is also proposed that the Community share should be increased to 70% (+ 30% more than what is proposed for the old Member States) in the case of the new Member States once they enter a transitional stage and have problems with the co-financing of the risk- and crisis-management scheme.
Poleg tega je treba združenjem kmetov in/ali medpanožnim organizacijam dodeliti dejavnejšo vlogo pri preprečevanju tveganj in kriz ob upoštevanju možnosti, ki jih ponujajo za širjenje boljšega poznavanja trgov.
Furthermore, it is considered that a more active role should be conferred on farmers’ organisations and/or interbranch organisations as regards the prevention of risks and crises, in view of the fact that such organisations have the potential to promote a better knowledge of the markets.
b) Mehanizmi tržne intervencije
(b) Market-intervention mechanisms
– Navadna pšenica
- Soft wheat
Predlaga se ohranitev mehanizma intervencije ob omejitvi časovnega razporeda na zadnje tri mesece tržnega leta, da bi se upoštevalo njegovo delovanje „varnostne mreže“ in izognilo špekulaciji.
It is proposed that the intervention mechanism should continue to operate, although the timetable for the last three months of the marketing year should be shortened so that it can perform its role as a safety net and prevent speculation.
Poleg tega se mehanizem razpisa, ki ga predlaga Komisija, zavrne zaradi možnosti povzročitve spiralnega padca cen.
On the other hand the award mechanism proposed by the Commission is rejected on the grounds that it would cause prices to enter a downward spiral.
– Sektor prašičereje
- Pigmeat sector
Ob upoštevanju previdnostnega načela se predlaga ohranitev ničnega mehanizma intervencije.
Pursuant to the precautionary principle it is proposed that the zero-quantity intervention mechanism should continue to operate.
– Sektor mleka
- Dairy sector
Predlaga se ohranitev pomoči za prevzem proizvodnje izključno za neprofitne organizacije.
It is proposed that aid for the relief of surpluses should be retained, although exclusively for non-profit-making organisations.
c) Zasebno skladiščenje
(c) Private storage
Predlaga se, da se govedina vključi v mehanizem zasebnega skladiščenja takoj, ko je izpostavljena enakim tveganjem kot druge vrste mesa.
It is proposed that veal should be included in the private-storage mechanism, since it is exposed to the same uncertainties as other kinds of meat.
d) Izvozna nadomestila za žita
(d) Export refunds for cereals
Komisija se je obvezala, da ukine ta mehanizem takoj, ko bo končan krog pogajanj iz Dohe v okviru skupne ureditve trgov.
The Commission has given an undertaking that this mechanism will be abolished when the WTO Doha Round is concluded.
e) Sektor mleka
(e) Dairy sector
Reforma sektorja mleka je eden izmed najtežavnejših delov „sistematskega pregleda“, o katerem se stališča najbolj razhajajo zaradi velikih razlik med pogoji proizvodnje na celotnem ozemlju Unije.
Reform of the dairy sector is one of the most sensitive aspects of the ‘health check’ and the one which give rise to the widest variety of opinions, in view of the huge differences in production conditions throughout the EU.
Ker je treba doseči zadovoljiv dogovor ob upoštevanju hitrega spreminjanja cen, ki so v bližnji preteklosti zaznamovale trg mleka, se predlaga sprejetje previdnejšega pristopa od tistega, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, in sicer:
In the search for a satisfactory compromise and in view of the price fluctuations which have characterised the dairy market in the recent past, it is proposed that a rather more cautious approach should be adopted than the one contained in the Commission proposal, on the following terms:
– povečanje kvot za mleko za 1 % za tržni leti 2009/2010 in 2010/2011;
- 15% increase in dairy quotas for the 2009/10 and 2010/11 marketing years;
– načrtovanje predčasnega sprejetja sklepov v letu 2010 o prihodnosti sektorja ob upoštevanju ustrezne ocene obdobja treh predhodnih tržnih let;
- Decisions concerning the future of the sector to be brought forward to 2010, taking into account an adequate assessment of the period corresponding to the three previous marketing years;
Uredba Sveta (ES) o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) ter Sklep Sveta o spremembi Sklepa 2006/144/ES o strateških smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja (programsko obdobje 2007–2013)
COUNCIL REGULATION AMENDING REGULATION (EC) NO 1698/2005 ON SUPPORT FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT BY THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL FUND FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT (EAFRD) AND COUNCIL DECISION AMENDING DECISION 2006/144/EC ON THE COMMUNITY STRATEGIC GUIDELINES FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PROGRAMMING (period 2007 to 2013)
Poročevalec se sicer strinja z oceno Komisije, da je treba v program za razvoj podeželja vključiti nove izzive, zlasti boj proti podnebnim spremembam, obnovljive vire energije, upravljanje vode in ohranjanje biološke raznovrstnosti, vendar ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti večjo možnost prilagajanja.
- The rapporteur agrees with the Commission’s analysis as regards the need for new challenges to be included in rural-development programmes with particular reference to climate change, renewable energy sources, water management and the protection of biodiversity, although he considers that the Member States should be allowed greater flexibility.
Komisija je za soočanje s temi izzivi sicer izbrala bolj prilagodljiv pristop na podlagi seznama številnih ukrepov, ki bi jih lahko izvajale države članice, vendar pa je tudi predlagala, da se ti ukrepi v celoti financirajo z dodatnimi sredstvi, ki se pridobijo iz novega sistema modulacije.
Although on the one hand the Commission – in order to take such challenges into account – opts for a flexible approach when drawing up a non-exhaustive list of possible measures to be applied by the Member States, it stipulates on the other hand that such measures must be fully financed from the additional funds stemming from the new modulation.
Poročevalec predlaga, da se ta obveznost omeji na 50 % dodatnih sredstev, kar bi državam članicam omogočilo večjo prožnost pri uporabi finančnih sredstev, prenesenih v drugi steber ter pridobljenih iz novega sistema modulacije, z določanjem zgornje meje in novim mehanizmom „premostitvene klavzule“ iz člena 68, za tiste ukrepe, ki se izvajajo v sklopu „novih izzivov“, ali za okrepitev programov držav članic za razvoj podeželja.
The rapporteur suggests that this obligation should be restricted to 50% of the additional funds, which will allow the Member States greater flexibility as regards the use of the financial resources transferred to the second pillar and stemming from the new modulation, the ceiling and the new passerelle mechanism incorporated into Article 68, both for actions to be implemented in the context of the ‘new challenges’ and for the purpose of strengthening the Member States’ rural-development programmes.
Med drugim se predlagajo dodatni ukrepi v zvezi z
Also proposed are additional measures relating to:
– uporabo sončne, vetrne in geotermične energije;
- the use of solar, wind and geothermic energy,
– izboljšanjem upravljanja odpadkov in ponovno uporabo materialov;
- improved management of waste and the recycling of materials,
– obvladovanjem poplavne ogroženosti.
- flood-risk management.
Predlaga se razširitev področja uporabe tega instrumenta prek preglednosti stroškov, povezanih z ukrepi za spodbujanje inovacij in prenosa znanj, ki niso le prispevek področja kmetijstva in razvoja podeželja k lizbonski pogodbi, temveč tudi orodje za iskanje boljših rešitev za nove izzive, zlasti za vprašanja v zvezi z novimi viri energije in bojem proti podnebnim spremembam, z ohranjanjem biološke raznovrstnosti ter upravljanjem vodnih virov.
- It is proposed that the scope for this instrument should be enlarged in order to extend eligibility to expenditure relating to specific measures intended to promote innovation and knowledge-transfer, not only as a contribution to agriculture and rural development under the Lisbon Strategy but also in order to enable a more effective response to be made to the new challenges, in particular matters relating to new energy sources and action to combat climate change, biodiversity and the management of water rouses.
Ob upoštevanju vprašanja staranja kmetov in izseljevanja s podeželja je treba povečati pomoč pri namestitvi mladih kmetov s 55 000 EUR na 75 000 EUR.
In view of the pre-existing problem of an ageing agricultural workforce and rural exodus, greater support should be provided for the initial establishment of young farmers, with the payment being increased from EUR 55 000 to EUR 75 000.
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja predlog Komisije za nadaljevanje reforme SKP, ki bo kmetom omogočila bolj hiter in prilagodljiv odziv na razmere na trgu in jih pripravila na soočanje z novimi izzivi, kot so podnebne spremembe, upravljanje z vodami, bioenergija in dvig cen hrane.
Your draftsman welcomes the Commission proposals to continue the CAP reform, to allow the farmers to respond quicker and more flexible to the market signals and to prepare them to face the new challenges such as climate change, water management, bio-energy and food price rise.
Poudariti želi, da mora biti vpliv predlogov, povezanih s sistematskim pregledom, na proračun EU za leto 2009 in na finančno perspektivo (2010–2013) proračunsko nevtralen.
He wishes to point out that the impact of the Health Check proposals on the EU budget 2009 and on the financial perspective (2010-2013) has to be budgetary neutral.
Finančni tokovi med stebrom I (neposredna plačila kmetom) in stebrom II (razvoj podeželja) v proračunski postavki 2 (naslov 05) bi morali biti proračunsko nevtralni.
The financial flows between Pillar I (direct payments to farmers) and Pillar II (rural development) within Heading 2 (Title 05), should be by design budgetary neutral.
Tudi vsaka sprememba v predlogih Komisije bi morala ohraniti nevtralnost.
Any change of the Commission's proposals should also remain neutral.
Po drugi strani pa je zelo težko predvideti končne zneske, potrebne za neposredna plačila v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo.
On the other hand, it is very difficult to foresee the final amounts needed for direct payments according to the legislation in force.
Skupna pravila za sheme neposrednih plačil – predlogi sprememb o novi predlagani uredbi (predlog Komisije, del 2008/103(CNS))
Common rules for direct support schemes - Amendments concerning the new regulation proposed (CNS 2008/103 part of the Commission proposal)