natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5. je zaradi teh podatkov še vedno prepričan, da so nujno potrebne pravne prilagoditve; zaradi Direktive 2006/22/ES
Considers that these figures confirm once again its view that there is an urgent need for legal adjustments; is confident, therefore, in the light of Directive 2006/22/EC
Direktiva 2006/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o minimalnih pogojih za izvajanje uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 3820/85 in (EGS) št. 3821/85 o socialni zakonodaji v zvezi z dejavnostmi v cestnem prometu (UL L 102, 11.4.2006, str.
Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities (OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p.
35). , ki je začela veljati maja 2006, in Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006
35). , which entered into force in May 2006, and Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
6. v okviru komitološkega postopka iz Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 poziva Komisijo, naj do oktobra 2008 predlaga smernice za enotno opredelitev in razvrstitev kršitev;
Calls on the Commission, under the comitology procedure set out in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, to propose guidelines for the uniform definition and classification of infringements by October 2008;
8. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev ustreznih naložb v razvoj infrastrukture cestnega prometa, pri čemer je treba dati prednost izgradnji varnih parkirišč;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to take the necessary measures to ensure adequate investment for road transport infrastructural development; in this context, the construction of secure parking facilities should be a priority;
o letnem poročilu o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2007
on the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2007
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2007,
– having regard to the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2007,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. marca 1994 o pravilih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic1
– having regard to Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. septembra 2001, ki spreminja člen 3 pravil in splošnih pogojev, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic
– having regard to its resolution of 6 September 2001 amending Article 3 of the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sporazuma o sodelovanju, sklenjenega 15. marca 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom in varuhom človekovih pravic, ki je začel veljati 1. aprila 2006,
– having regard to the framework agreement on cooperation concluded between the European Parliament and the Ombudsman on 15 March 2006, which entered into force on 1 April 2006,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. oktobra 2005 v zvezi s pooblastilom za sprejetje in posredovanje sporočil evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in za nastop javnih uradnikov pred njim ( SEC(2005)1227 ),
– having regard to the Commission's communication of 5 October 2005 entitled 'Empowerment to adopt and transmit communications to the European Ombudsman and authorise civil servants to appear before the European Ombudsman' (SEC (2005)1227),
– ob upoštevanju pisma z julija 2006, ki ga je evropski varuh človekovih pravic poslal predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta, da bi se začel postopek za spremembo statuta varuha človekovih pravic,
– having regard to the letter of July 2006 sent by the European Ombudsman to the President of the European Parliament with a view to initiating the procedure for the revision of the Ombudsman's Statute,
– ob upoštevanju svojega osnutka sklepa z dne 22. aprila 2008
– having regard to its draft decision of 22 April 2008
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0129 . in svoje resolucije z dne 18. junija 2008 o sprejetju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta, ki spreminja sklep Evropskega parlamenta 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom z dne 9. marca 1994 o predpisih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha človekovih pravic
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0129 . and its resolution of 18 June 2008 on the adoption of a decision of the European Parliament amending its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0301 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0301 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the European Ombudsman's activities,
– ob upoštevanju druge in tretje povedi člena 195(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 195(2), second and third sentences, of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za peticije ( A6‑0358/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0358/2008 ),
A. ker je bilo letno poročilo o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2007 uradno posredovano predsedniku Parlamenta dne 10. marca 2008 in ker je evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamandouros predstavil svoje poročilo odboru za peticije dne 19. maja 2008 v Strasbourgu,
A. whereas the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2007 was formally submitted to the President of Parliament on 10 March 2008 and whereas the Ombudsman, Mr Nikiforos Diamandouros, presented the report to the Committee on Petitions in Strasbourg on 19 May 2008,
B. ker so Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, ki je bila prvič razglašena decembra 2000, podpisana 12. decembra 2007, predsedniki Parlamenta, Komisije in Sveta pa so jo ponovno potrdili in ker je zaveza o pravno zavezujoči Listini, zapisana v lizbonski pogodbi, za katero poteka ratifikacijski postopek, izraz naraščajoče zavesti, da morajo biti državljani v središču prizadevanj pregledne, dostopne in dosegljive Evrope, ki se zaveda vprašanj, ki jih tarejo,
B. whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, originally proclaimed in December 2000, was signed on 12 December 2007, and reconfirmed by the Presidents of Parliament, of the Commission and of the Council, and whereas the commitment to a legally binding Charter, contained in the Treaty of Lisbon, which is in the process of ratification, reflects a growing awareness that citizens should be placed at the centre of a transparent, accessible and contactable Europe which is aware of the concerns of its citizens,
C. ker je v členu 41 Listine določeno: "Vsakdo ima pravico, da institucije in organi Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku",
C. whereas Article 41 of the Charter states: 'Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union',
D. ker je v členu 43 Listine določeno: "Vsaka državljanka in vsak državljan Unije ter vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic ima pravico, da se glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij ali organov Skupnosti obrne na varuha človekovih pravic, razen glede Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje v njuni pravosodni funkciji",
D. whereas Article 43 of the Charter states: 'Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role',
E. ker je bistveno, da institucije in organi Skupnosti v celoti izkoristijo potrebna sredstva za izpolnitev svojih obveznosti, zato da dobijo državljani hitre in celovite odgovore na svoja vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije,
E. whereas it is essential that the European institutions and bodies make full use of the necessary resources in order to fulfil their obligation to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions,
F. ker kljub temu, da je preteklo že sedem let od sprejetja navedene resolucije Parlamenta z dne 6. septembra 2001, s katero je bil potrjen kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev, ki ga je pripravil varuh človekovih pravic, druge glavne institucije še vedno niso upoštevale nujnega poziva Parlamenta, naj delujejo v skladu z določbami tega kodeksa,
F. whereas, although seven years have passed since the adoption of Parliament's above-mentioned resolution of 6 September 2001 approving the Ombudsman's Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, the other main institutions have not yet complied with Parliament's urgent request that they bring their practice into line with the provisions of that code,
G. ker je bilo leta 2007 prejetih približno 16 % manj pritožb kot leta 2006, medtem ko se je število dopustnih pritožb povečalo tako absolutno kot relativno, in sicer s 449 (12 % skupnega števila) v letu 2006 na 518 (16 % skupnega števila) v letu 2007,
G. whereas about 16% fewer complaints were received in 2007 than in 2006 but the number of admissible complaints increased in both absolute and relative terms from 449 (12% of the total) to 518 (16% of the total) in 2007,
H. ker rezultati 348 opravljenih preiskav, od katerih jih je bilo 341 povezanih s pritožbami, sedem pa jih je bilo opravljenih na pobudo varuha človekovih pravic, kažejo, da v 95 primerih (kar je 25,7 % obravnavanih pritožb) niso bile ugotovljene nepravilnosti,
H. whereas the findings of the 348 completed inquiries, of which 341 were linked to complaints and 7 were own-initiative investigations, show that in 95 cases (corresponding to 25.7% of the complaints investigated) no maladministration could be ascertained,
I. ker se je leta 2007 podvojilo število primerov, ko so institucije ali organi na podlagi pritožbe varuhu človekovih pravic sami odpravili nepravilnosti (129 zadev), kar kaže na njihovo vedno večjo pripravljenost, da pritožbe, naslovljene na varuha, vidijo kot priložnost za popravo storjenih napak in sodelovanje z varuhom v korist državljanov,
I. whereas the year 2007 saw a doubling of the number of cases of maladministration settled by the institution or body itself following a complaint to the Ombudsman (129 cases), which reflects a growing willingness on the part of the institutions and bodies to see complaints to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to put right mistakes that have occurred and to cooperate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of citizens,
J. ker je bilo leta 2007 pet primerov sporazumno rešenih in ker je bilo konec leta 2007 v obravnavi še vedno 31 predlogov za sporazumno rešitev,
J. whereas 5 cases were closed in 2007 after an amicable resolution had been achieved, and at the end of 2007 31 proposals for amicable resolutions were still under consideration,
K. ker je leta 2007 varuh človekovih pravic začel pogosteje uporabljati neformalne postopke za prožno reševanje problemov in bo imel tak pristop tudi v prihodnosti, kar dokazuje, da uživa veliko spoštovanje in da so institucije pripravljene pomagati državljanom,
K. whereas in 2007 the Ombudsman began to make wider use of more informal procedures to help resolve problems in a flexible way and will continue to develop this approach in the future, which proves the extent to which the Ombudsman is respected and demonstrates the institutions' readiness to help citizens,
L. ker je leta 2007 varuh človekovih pravic zaključil 55 preiskav s kritično oceno in ker ta pritožniku potrdi, da je njegova pritožba upravičena, zadevni instituciji ali organu pa nakaže, kje je storil napako, kar pripomore k preprečevanju nepravilnosti v prihodnje,
L. whereas in 2007 the Ombudsman closed 55 inquiries with critical remarks and whereas a critical remark confirms to the complainant that his or her complaint is justified and indicates to the institution or body concerned what it has done wrong, so as to help it avoid maladministration in the future,
M. ker je bilo leta 2007 podanih osem osnutkov priporočil, za sedem iz leta 2006 je bil sprejet sklep, enkrat pa je bilo Evropskemu parlamentu predloženo posebno poročilo,
M. whereas eight draft recommendations were made in 2007, seven draft recommendations from 2006 led to a decision in 2007 and one case led to a special report to the European Parliament,
N. ker kritične ocene v sklepih, s katerimi se zaključijo nerazrešljive zadeve o nepravilnostih, niti priporočila ali posebna poročila varuha človekovih pravic niso zavezujoči, saj mu njegova pooblastila ne omogočajo, da bi neposredno rešil tovrstne dogodke, marveč so mu podeljena za spodbujanje samoregulacije v institucijah in organih Evropske unije,
N. whereas neither the critical remarks contained in decisions closing irremediable cases of maladministration, nor recommendations or special reports by the Ombudsman, have binding effect, as his powers do not extend to directly remedying instances of maladministration but are intended to encourage self-regulation on the part of the European Union's institutions and bodies,
O. ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2007 Evropskemu parlamentu predložil eno posebno poročilo in ker je predložitev posebnega poročila Parlamentu pomembno sredstvo, s katerim varuh človekovih pravic pri nekaterih peticijah zaprosi za politično podporo Parlamenta in njegovega odbora za peticije, kadar gre za urejanje zadev državljanov, katerih pravice so bile kršene, in izboljšanje upravnih standardov v Evropski uniji,
O. whereas the Ombudsman submitted one special report to the European Parliament in 2007 and whereas submitting a special report to Parliament represents a valuable means by which the Ombudsman can seek the political support of Parliament and its Committee on Petitions in order to bring satisfaction to citizens whose rights have been infringed, as well as promoting the improvement of standards of EU administration,
P. ker ima Parlament od začetka veljavnosti pogodbe iz Nice enake pravice kot države članice, Svet in Komisija, da vloži tožbo pri Sodišču Evropske unije zaradi nepristojnosti, bistvene kršitve postopka, kršitve pogodbe o ES ali katerega koli pravnega pravila, ki se nanaša na njeno uporabo, ali zaradi zlorabe pooblastil,
P. whereas, since the entry into force of the Treaty of Nice, Parliament has enjoyed the same right as the Member States, the Council and the Commission to bring an action before the Court of Justice of the European Union on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the EC Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers,
Q. ker lahko institucionalni in drugi organi EU na podlagi kritičnih pripomb glede slabega upravljanja, ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic navedel v svojem poročilu za leto 2007 (kritične ocene, osnutki priporočil in posebno poročilo), izvajajo ustrezne ukrepe, da se napake in slabo delovanje v prihodnosti ne bi ponavljali,
Q. whereas the critical comments regarding maladministration voiced by the Ombudsman in the 2007 report (critical remarks, draft recommendations and special report) may serve as a basis for avoiding a repetition of errors and malfunctions in future by the implementation of appropriate measures by the institutional and other bodies of the EU,
R. ker sodelovanje, ki ga je vzpostavil varuh človekovih pravic v okviru evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic, že več kot deset let deluje kot prožen sistem za izmenjavo informacij in dobre prakse ter kot sredstvo za usmerjanje pritožnikov na varuhe človekovih pravic ali podobne organe, ki jim lahko najbolj pomagajo,
R. whereas the cooperation established by the Ombudsman within the European Network of Ombudsmen has functioned for over ten years as a flexible system for exchanging information and best practice and as a means of directing complainants to the ombudsmen or other similar bodies most able to assist them,
S. ker se je vloga varuha človekovih pravic pri zaščiti državljanov EU v dvanajstih letih od ustanovitve njegove funkcije okrepila, zahvaljujoč neodvisnosti varuha in demokratičnemu nadzoru njegovih dejavnosti, ki ga izvaja Parlament,
S. whereas the role of the Ombudsman in protecting EU citizens has evolved in the 12 years since the office was created, thanks to the Ombudsman's independence and Parliament's democratic scrutiny of the transparency of his activities,
T. ker morajo dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic in Odbora za peticije ostati ločene in ker morata zadeve, ki jih obravnavata, praviloma predložiti drug drugemu, da se izogneta sporom glede svojih pravic,
T. whereas the activities of the Ombudsman and of the Committee on Petitions must remain separate and, as a general rule aimed at avoiding conflicts as regards their respective prerogatives, should include reciprocal definitive referral of their respective files,
2. poziva, naj vse institucije in organi EU prejmejo proračunska sredstva in kadre, ki jih potrebujejo, da bi lahko državljanom dali hitre in vsebinske odgovore na njihova vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije;
Calls for all EU institutions and bodies to be given the necessary budgetary and human resources to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions;
11. pozdravlja splošno konstruktivno sodelovanje varuha človekovih pravic z institucijami in organi EU ter potrjuje njegovo vlogo zunanjega nadzornega mehanizma in dragocenega vira za nenehno izboljševanje evropske uprave;
Welcomes the generally constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU institutions and bodies and endorses him in his role of external control mechanism and, in addition, as a valuable source of ongoing improvement to European administration;
13. meni, da lahko Parlament, če katera institucija noče ravnati v skladu s priporočilom iz posebnega poročila varuha človekovih pravic, kljub temu da ga je odobril Parlament, legitimno uporabi svoja pooblastila, da vloži tožbo pri Sodišču zaradi dejanj ali opustitve dejanj, ki so bila predmet varuhovega priporočila;
Considers that, if an institution refuses to follow a recommendation contained in a special report by the Ombudsman despite Parliament having approved that recommendation, Parliament could legitimately use its powers to bring an action before the Court of Justice in respect of the act or omission which was the subject of the Ombudsman's recommendation;
15. meni, da bi lahko varuh človekovih pravic in odbor za peticije, kadar v okviru svojih nalog in pristojnosti preiskujeta vprašanja, ki se prekrivajo – npr. na eni strani način, kako Komisija obravnava kršitve, in na drugi strani kršitve same –, s tesnim sodelovanjem dosegla zelo koristno sinergijo;
Considers that, when the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions, acting within their respective mandates and competences, investigate overlapping issues, such as, respectively, the manner in which the Commission has conducted infringement proceedings and the alleged infringement itself, they can achieve useful synergy through close cooperation;
18. pozdravlja pobude evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, da širši javnosti predstavlja svoje delo in delo nacionalnih varuhov, ter varuhu priporoča, naj si še naprej prizadeva za večjo ozaveščenost državljanov;
Welcomes the European Ombudsman's initiatives to advertise widely both his own work and the work carried out by national ombudsmen, and recommends that the Ombudsman further pursue his efforts to raise citizens' awareness;
21. ker ima vsaka institucija svojo spletno stran, na kateri je mogoče vložiti pritožbe ipd., in ker imajo državljani preglavice z razlikovanjem različnih institucij, pozdravlja razvoj interaktivnega priročnika za pomoč državljanom pri prepoznavanju najustreznejše institucije za reševanje njihovih težav;
Given that each institution has its own web site enabling complaints, petitions, etc. to be lodged, and given that this frustrates citizens in distinguishing between the various institutions, welcomes the development of an interactive manual designed to assist citizens in identifying the most suitable forum for resolving their problems;
23. predlaga, naj varuh človekovih pravic sprejme ukrepe za zmanjšanje števila pritožb (skupaj 1021), v zvezi s katerimi sploh ni ukrepal;
Proposes that the Ombudsman take measures to reduce the number of complaints (a total of 1 021) in relation to which no steps have been taken by him at all;
Predsednik Evropskega parlamenta Hans-Gert Pöttering je 10. marca 2008 uradno prejel letno poročilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2007, evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamandouros pa svoje poročilo dne 19. maja 2008 predstavil odboru za peticije.
The annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2007 was formally submitted to the President of the European Parliament, Hans-Gert Pöttering, on 10 March 2008 and the European Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros presented his report to the Committee on Petitions on 19 May 2008.
Poročilo nudi dober povzetek dejavnosti evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v minulem letu.
The report provides a good overview of the European Ombudsman's activities over the last year.
Različne ugotovitve preiskav so predstavljene jasno, s primeri in po kategorijah, kot so vrste domnevne nepravilnosti ali zadevne institucije.
The various inquiry findings are presented clearly using examples and are broken down by categories such as nature of alleged maladministration or institution concerned.
Čeprav drži, da so v prilogi seznami skupnih števil in odstotkov, je mogoče statistične razpredelnice še izboljšati, saj znajo biti razmerja v njih dokaj nejasna.
While it is true that the annex does list both absolute figures and percentages, there can nevertheless still be made improvements for the statistical tables, where the mix of figures and percentages can be confusing.
Poleg tega je bilo leta 2007 manj nedopustnih primerov kot leta 2006.
Furthermore, the number of inadmissible cases was lower in 2007 than in 2006.
Leta 2007 je varuh izvedel 641 preiskav.
The total numbers of inquiries dealt with by the Ombudsman in 2007 was 641.
Od tega se jih je 64 % nanašalo na Evropsko komisijo, 14 % na EPSO, 9 % na Evropski parlament in 1 % na Svet Evropske unije.
Of these, 64% concerned the European Commission, 14% concerned EPSO, 9% the European Parliament and 1% the Council of the European Union.
Glavne vrste domnevnih nepravilnosti so pomanjkanje preglednosti, vključno z zavračanjem posredovanja informacij, krivičnost in zloraba moči, nezadovoljivi postopki, neupravičene zamude, diskriminacija, malomarnost, pravne napake in neizpolnjevanje dolžnosti.
The main types of alleged maladministration were lack of transparency, including refusal of information, unfairness and abuse of powers, unsatisfactory procedures, avoidable delay, discrimination, negligence, legal errors and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations.
Leta 2007 je bilo s sklepom zaključenih 348 preiskav, vključno s sedmimi na lastno pobudo, kar je 40 % več v primerjavi z letom 2006.
348 decisions closing inquiries were made in 2007, including 7 own-initiative inquiries, which represents a 40% increase compared with 2006.
V 95 primerih je preiskava pokazala, da ni bilo nepravilnosti, kar ni vedno negativno za pritožnika, saj mu je posredovana celostna obrazložitev zadevne institucije ali organa, to pa je lahko priložnost za opredelitev, kako izboljšati kakovost upravnih storitev, ki jih izvaja.
In 95 cases the inquiry revealed no maladministration, a finding which is not always negative for the complainant, since he or she gets a full explanation from the institution or body concerned, and there may be an opportunity to identify a potential improvement in the quality of administration provided by an institution or body.
V letu 2007 so zadevne institucije ali organi v prid pritožnika rešile 129 primerov.
During 2007, 129 cases were settled to the satisfaction of the complainant by the institution or body concerned.