natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropska komisija je seznanjena z mnenjem Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, da je treba pri uradnih obvestilih o delegiranih aktih – razen v primerih, ko zakonodajni akt predpisuje nujni postopek – upoštevati obdobja počitnic institucij (zimske in poletne počitnice, evropske volitve), in tako zagotoviti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu možnost, da izvajata svoja pooblastila v rokih, določenih v ustreznih zakonodajnih aktih, ter je pripravljena ravnati v skladu s tem.
The European Commission takes note that except in cases where the legislative act provides for an urgency procedure, the European Parliament and the Council consider that the notification of delegated acts shall take into account the periods of recess of the institutions (winter, summer and European elections), in order to ensure that the European Parliament and the Council are able to exercise their prerogatives within the time limits laid down in the relevant legislative acts, and is ready to act accordingly.
Prevoz tlačne opreme, kot so cisterne, posode in jeklenke, zdaj ureja
The transport of pressure equipment, such as tanks, receptacles and cylinders is presently governed by
Direktiva 1999/36/ES .
Directive 1999/36/EC .
V njej so določene varnostne zahteve za cestni in železniški prevoz.
The Directive lays down safety requirements for transport by road and by rail.
Poleg tega ta direktiva z enotnimi normativi za načrtovanje, izdelavo in preverjanje med uporabo zagotavlja prost pretok te opreme v Skupnosti, vključno z njenim dajanjem v promet.
Furthermore, the Directive ensures the free movement of such equipment within the Community, including its placing on the market, by establishing common norms for the design, construction and subsequent checks.
Nekatere tehnične določbe obstoječe direktive so v nasprotju z mednarodnimi predpisi glede prevoza nevarnega blaga, ki so z nedavno sprejeto Direktivo 2008/68/ES o prevozu nevarnega blaga po cestah, železnicah in celinskih plovnih poteh postali del zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Some technical provisions of the existing Directive conflict with international rules on the transport of dangerous goods, which moreover have been extended to Community legislation by the recently adopted Directive 2008/68/EC on the transport of dangerous goods by road, rail and inland waterways.
Komisija je zato predložila predlog za revidirano direktivo, ki bi razveljavil obstoječo direktivo o premični tlačni opremi in številne druge s tem povezane direktive.
The Commission have therefore put forward a proposal for a revised Directive, which would repeal the existing Directive on transportable pressure equipment and a number of other related Directives.
Predlog ne prinaša bistvenih sprememb obstoječega regulativnega okvira glede področja uporabe in glavnih določb.
The proposal does not entail any substantial changes to the existing regulatory framework as regards the scope and the main provisions.
Najpomembnejši cilj predloga je odpraviti zgoraj omenjene nedoslednosti z uskladitvijo tehničnih zahtev z mednarodnimi predpisi glede prevoza nevarnega blaga.
Its most important objective is to remove the above-mentioned inconsistencies by bringing technical requirements in line with international rules on the transport of dangerous goods.
Nadaljnji cilj predloga sta poenostavitev in posodobitev nekaterih določb, zlasti določb v zvezi s postopki ugotavljanja skladnosti.
Furthermore, it aims to simplify and streamline some provisions, in particular those relating to conformity assessment procedures.
Nazadnje pa predlog glede uporabe opreme pri prevozih na notranjem trgu vključuje določbe t. i. uredbe novega zakonodajnega okvira (765/2008/ES), ki določa splošni okvir za trženje proizvodov na enotnem evropskem trgu.
Finally, as regards the use of the equipment for transport operations in the internal market, the proposal incorporates provisions of the so-called "New Legislative Framework Regulation" (765/2008/EC).
Delovna skupina Sveta, ki je predlog preučila večkrat, je pripravila osnutek, ki se v glavnem ujema s predlaganim besedilom Komisije in prinaša le nekaj sprememb.
Having considered the proposal on various occasions, the Council Working Group produced a draft text, which broadly corresponds to the text proposed by the Commission, introducing only a few modifications.
Te se med drugim nanašajo na:
They concern among others:
· pojasnitev opredelitve „premične tlačne opreme“;
· A clarification of the definition of "transportable pressure equipment";
· vključitev potrebnih sklicevanj na „vmesne inšpekcijske preglede“;
· The inclusion of necessary references to "intermediate inspections";
· pojasnitve v zvezi s ponovnim ugotavljanjem skladnosti obstoječe premične tlačne opreme, za katero ugotavljanje skladnosti še ni bilo opravljeno v skladu z obstoječo direktivo;
· Clarifications on the reassessment of conformity of existing transportable pressure equipment not previously assessed under the existing Directive;
· možnost, da države članice omejijo ali prepovejo dajanje opreme v promet in njeno uporabo, kadar je zaradi nje v nekaterih okoliščinah ogrožena varnost;
· The possibility for Member States to limit or prohibit the placing on the market and use of equipment in cases where it presents a risk to safety in certain circumstances;
· določbo, na podlagi katere za zasebnike ne veljajo obveznosti lastnikov premične tlačne opreme, če se ta uporablja zasebno ali za prostočasne dejavnosti.
· A provision exempting private individuals from the obligations of owners of transportable pressure equipment as far as it is used privately or for leisure activities;
Svet je poleg tega spremenil postopek za prilagoditev prilog, da bi jih uskladili z novimi določbami o komitologiji po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe (delegirani akti).
In addition, the Council modified the procedure for the adaptation of the Annexes in order to bring them in line with the new provisions on comitology following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty ("delegated acts").
Poročevalec podpira cilje revizije direktive o premični opremi in meni, da bo predlog, ko bo sprejet, zagotavljal visoko raven varnosti za premično tlačno opremo in njene uporabnike.
Your rapporteur supports the objectives pursued through the revision of the Transportable Equipment Directive (TPED) and believes that the proposal will, once adopted, ensure a high level of safety for transportable pressure equipment and its users.
Poročevalec razen določb o komitologiji pozdravlja omenjene pojasnitve, ki jih predlaga Svet in ki se zato tudi odražajo v predlogih sprememb v osnutku njegovega poročila.
Furthermore, with the exception of the provisions on comitology, the rapporteur welcomes the above clarifications suggested by the Council, which are thus reflected by the amendments proposed in his draft report.
Predlogi sprememb torej ustrezajo osnutku besedila Sveta, razen v naslednjih treh točkah:
Hence, the amendments correspond to the Council's draft text except with regard to the following three points:
· Predlagana je prilagoditev besedila uvodne izjave 13 o ponovnem ugotavljanju skladnosti z vstavitvijo sklicevanja na „prosto uporabo“, s katero se pojasni, da ponovno ugotavljanje ni potrebno, če se obstoječa oprema uporablja na povsem nacionalni ali regionalni osnovi (gl. predlog spremembe 4).
· Firstly, it is proposed to adjust the wording of Recital 13 on the reassessment of conformity by inserting a reference to "free use" in order to clarify that a reassessment is not necessary in cases where existing equipment is used on a purely national or regional basis (see amendment 4).
· Poročevalec predlaga novo uvodno izjavo 18a, s katero se Komisijo poziva, naj pripravi smernice za lažjo praktično izvajanje določb, kakor je že predvideno v obstoječi direktivi.
· Secondly, your rapporteur proposes a new Recital 18a which calls on the Commission to produce guidelines that facilitate the practical implementation of the provisions, as is already foreseen under the existing Directive.
· V zvezi z novimi določbami o komitologiji pa je poročevalec na podlagi horizontalnega nasveta pravne službe Parlamenta uvedel spremembe, katerih namen je ohranitev pristojnosti Parlamenta in izpolnitev njegovih postopkovnih zahtev tako glede preklica prenosa pristojnosti Komisiji kot glede ugovorov zoper delegirane akte.
· Finally, as far as the new provisions on comitology are concerned, your rapporteur introduced modifications following horizontal advice from Parliament's legal services, which aim at preserving Parliament's prerogatives and meeting its procedural requirements as regards both the revocation of the delegation of powers to the Commission and objections to delegated acts.
Poročevalec ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba do horizontalne medinstitucionalne rešitve glede besedila novih določb komitologije obravnavano vprašanje čim prej končati s sporazumom v prvi obravnavi.
The rapporteur estimates that pending a horizontal solution between the institutions regarding the wording of the new comitology provisions, the dossier should be concluded as quickly as possible with an agreement in first reading.
Odbor je zato pozvan, naj poročilo sprejme brez dodatnih predlogov sprememb, poročevalcu pa podeli mandat za pogajanja s Svetom na tej podlagi.
The Committee is therefore invited to adopt the report without additional amendments and mandate the rapporteur to enter into negotiations with Council on this basis.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembah direktiv 2003/71/ES o prospektu, ki se objavi ob javni ponudbi ali sprejemu vrednostnih papirjev v trgovanje in 2004/109/ES o uskladitvi zahtev v zvezi s preglednostjo informacij o izdajateljih, katerih vrednostni papirji so sprejeti v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2003/71/EC on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0491 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0491 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in členov 44 in 95 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerimi je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7‑0170/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 44 and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0170/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in členov 50 in 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and Articles 50 and 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske centralne banke
– having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank
UL C19, 26.1.2010, str.
OJ C19, 26.1.2010, p.
Mnenje z dne 18. februarja 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu). ,
Opinion of 18.2.2010 (not yet published in the OJ). ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A7‑0102/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A7‑0102/2010 ),
(4a) Po zaključku poročila visoke skupine za finančni nadzor v EU (Larosièrova skupina) je Komisija 23. septembra 2009 predstavila konkretne zakonodajne predloge za vzpostavitev evropskega sistema finančnih nadzornih organov, ki vključuje mrežo nacionalnih finančnih nadzornih organov, ki delujejo skupaj z novimi evropskimi nadzornimi organi.
(4a) Following the conclusions of the report of the High Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU (the d e Larosière group ) , the Commission put forward concrete legislative proposals on 23 September 2009 in order to establish a European System of Financial Supervisors (ESFS) co mprising a network of national financial supervisors working in tandem with new European Supervisory Authorities.
Poleg tega bo novo ustanovljeni Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge (ESMA) nadomestil Odbor evropskih zakonodajalcev za vrednostne papirje (CESR).
Moreover, t he newly created European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is to replace the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR).
(6) Investicijske družbe in kreditne institucije morajo biti za namene zasebnih prodaj vrednostnih papirjev upravičene do tega, da kot dobro poučene vlagatelje obravnavajo tiste fizične ali pravne osebe, ki jih štejejo za poklicne stranke ali s katerimi ravnajo kot s poklicnimi strankami, ali tiste, ki so priznane kot primerne pogodbene stranke v skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih finančnih instrumentov in o spremembah direktiv Sveta 85/611/EGS, 93/6/EGS in Direktive 2000/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter o razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 93/22/EGS .
(6) For the purposes of private placements of securities, investment firms and credit institutions should be entitled to treat as qualified investors those natural or legal persons that are considered to be or that they treat as professional clients, or that are recognized eligible counterparties in accordance with Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC .
V tem smislu bi z uskladitvijo ustreznih določb direktiv 2003/71/ES in 2004/39/ES zmanjšali zapletenost in znižali stroške investicijskih družb v primeru zasebnih prodaj, saj bi družbe lahko opredelile osebe, na katere je prodaja naslovljena, na podlagi svojega seznama poklicnih strank in primernih pogodbenih strank.
An alignment of the relevant provisions of Directives 2003/71/EC and 2004/39/EC in this sense would reduce complexity and costs for investment firms in the event of private placements because the firms would be able to define the persons to whom the placement is to be addressed relying on their own list of professional clients and eligible counterparties.
Opredelitev dobro poučenih vlagateljev iz Direktive 2003/71/ES je zato treba razširiti tako, da bo vključevala navedene osebe.
Therefore, the definition of qualified investors in Directive 2003/71/EC should be widened to include those persons.
(6) Investicijske družbe in kreditne institucije morajo biti za namene zasebnih prodaj vrednostnih papirjev upravičene do tega, da kot dobro poučene vlagatelje obravnavajo tiste fizične ali pravne osebe, ki jih štejejo za poklicne stranke ali s katerimi ravnajo kot s poklicnimi strankami, ali tiste, ki so priznane kot primerne pogodbene stranke v skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih finančnih instrumentov.
(6) For the purposes of private placements of securities, investment firms and credit institutions should be entitled to treat as qualified investors those natural or legal persons that are considered to be or that they treat as professional clients, or that are recognized eligible counterparties in accordance with Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments.
Izdajatelju bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se zanese na seznam poklicnih strank in primernih pogodbenih strank, ki je bil pripravljen v skladu s Prilogo II Direktive 2004/39/ES.
The issuer should be able to rely on the list of professional clients and eligible counterparties that has been drawn up in accordance with Annex II of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Opredelitev dobro poučenih vlagateljev iz Direktive 2003/71/ES je zato treba razširiti tako, da bo vključevala navedene osebe in ne bo treba ohranjati ločenega registra .
Therefore, the definition of qualified investors in Directive 2003/71/EC should be widened to include those persons and no separate register should be maintained .
Jasno bi moralo biti, da izdajatelj ne more preverjati pravilnosti razvrstitve za poklicno stranko ali primerno pogodbeno stranko.
It should be clear that the issuer is not in the position to check the correctness of a classification as a professional client or eligible counterparty.
Zaradi tega ne bi smel odgovarjati za napačno razvrstitev.
It should hence not incur liability for any misclassification.
(7) Za povečanje učinkovitosti in prožnosti izdajanja dolžniških instrumentov v Skupnosti bi bilo treba ukiniti omejitev o določitvi matične države članice za izdajo nelastniških vrednostnih papirjev z nominalno vrednostjo manj kot 1 000 EUR.
(7) In order to increase the efficiency and flexibility of the issuance of debt in the Community, the limitation on the determination of the home Member State for issues of non-equity securities with a denomination below EUR 1.000 should be removed.
Poleg tega je treba ustrezno spremeniti tudi mehanizem za določanje matične države članice in države članice gostiteljice iz Direktive 2004/109/ES.
The mechanism for the determination of the home and the host Member States in Directive 2004/109/EC should also be amended accordingly.
Z odpravo praga 1000 EUR, na podlagi katerega lahko izdajatelji nelastniških vrednostnih papirjev izberejo svoj pristojni organ, bi oslabili zaščito vlagateljev, zlasti malih vlagateljev, saj bi okrepili možnost, da se izdajatelji odločijo za regulativno arbitražo v škodo najbližjemu organu.
The removal of the €1000 threshold from which issuers of non-equity securities can choose their competent authority is likely to weaken investor protection, particularly the protection of retail investors, by enhancing the possibility for the issuer to engage in regulatory arbitration to the detriment of the closest authority.
(8) V veljavnem prospektu, ki ga pripravi izdajatelj ali ponudnik in je javnosti dostopen pri končni prodaji vrednostnih papirjev prek finančnih posrednikov ali pri kateri koli naslednji nadaljnji prodaji vrednostnih papirjev, je vlagateljem predstavljenih dovolj informacij za sprejetje informiranih naložbenih odločitev.
(8) A valid prospectus, drawn up by the issuer or the offeror and available to the public at the time of the final placement of securities through financial intermediaries or in any subsequent resale of securities, provides sufficient information for investors to make informed investment decisions.
Finančni posredniki, ki prodajajo ali nadaljnje prodajajo vrednostne papirje, morajo biti zato upravičeni do tega, da se zanašajo na prvotni prospekt, ki ga izda izdajatelj ali ponudnik, dokler je ta prospekt veljaven in ustrezno dopolnjen v skladu s členoma 9 in 16 Direktive 2003/71/ES ter se izdajatelj ali ponudnik, odgovoren za pripravo takega prospekta, strinja z njegovo uporabo.
Therefore, financial intermediaries placing or subsequently reselling the securities should be entitled to rely upon the initial prospectus published by the issuer or the offeror as long as this is valid and duly supplemented in accordance with Article 9 and Article 16 of Directive 2003/71/EC and the issuer or the offeror responsible for drawing up such prospectus consents to its use.
V tem primeru se ne sme zahtevati noben drug prospekt.
In this case no other prospectus should be required.
Če se izdajatelj ali ponudnik, odgovoren za pripravo takega prvotnega prospekta, ne strinja z njegovo uporabo, je treba od finančnega posrednika zahtevati objavo novega prospekta.
However, in case the issuer or the offeror responsible for drawing up such initial prospectus does not consent to its use, the financial intermediary should be required to publish a new prospectus.
Finančni posredniki, ki prodajajo ali nadaljnje prodajajo vrednostne papirje, morajo biti zato upravičeni do tega, da se zanašajo na prvotni prospekt, ki ga izda izdajatelj ali ponudnik, dokler je ta prospekt veljaven in ustrezno dopolnjen v skladu s členoma 9 in 16 Direktive 2003/71/ES ter se izdajatelj ali ponudnik, odgovoren za pripravo takega prospekta, in kateri koli drug subjekt, ki je v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo odgovoren za točnost vsebine določenega dela takega prospekta, strinja z njegovo uporabo.
Therefore, financial intermediaries placing or subsequently reselling the securities should be entitled to rely upon the initial prospectus published by the issuer or the offeror as long as this is valid and duly supplemented in accordance with Articles 9 and 16 of Directive 2003/71/EC and the issuer or the offeror responsible for drawing up such prospectus and any other entity which, pursuant to national law, is liable for the accuracy of a specific part of the content of such prospectus consents to its use.
Izdajatelju ali ponudniku je treba omogočiti, da lahko postavi pogoje za svojo privolitev.
The issuer or the offeror should be able to attach conditions to his or her consent.
Če je bila dana privolitev za uporabo prospekta, mora biti izdajatelj ali ponudnik, odgovoren za pripravo prvotnega prospekta, odgovoren tudi za v njem navedene informacije in se ne sme zahtevati noben drug prospekt.
In the event that consent to use the prospectus has been given, the issuer or the offeror responsible for drawing up the initial prospectus should be liable for the information stated therein and no other prospectus should be required.
Če je treba ne glede na dogovor posodobiti končne pogoje prospekta s specifičnimi informacijami glede nadaljnje prodaje, je za dodatne informacije odgovoren finančni posrednik, ki uporabi prospekt.
Where, notwithstanding such consent, the final terms of the prospectus have to be updated with specific information relating to a resale, the financial intermediary making use of the prospectus should be liable for such additional information.
Če se izdajatelj ali ponudnik, odgovoren za pripravo takega prvotnega prospekta, ne strinja z njegovo uporabo, je treba od finančnega posrednika zahtevati objavo novega prospekta.
However, where the issuer or the offeror responsible for drawing up such initial prospectus does not consent to its use, the financial intermediary should be required to publish a new prospectus.
Če se finančni posrednik odloči, da bo uporabil prvotni prospekt brez privolitve, mora biti posrednik odgovoren tudi za informacije, navedene v prvotnem prospektu.
Where the financial intermediary chooses to use the initial prospectus without consent, the intermediary should be liable for the information stated in the initial prospectus.
Izrecno je treba navesti, da mora posrednik odgovarjati za nespoštovanje pogojev, ki so povezani s privolitvijo izdajatelja ali ponudnika.
It should be explicit that the intermediary makes itself liable in case he does not respect the conditions attached to the consent of the issuer or offeror.
(8a) Da se omogoči učinkovita uporaba Direktive 2003/71/ES), Direktive 2004/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. decembra 2004 o uskladitvi zahtev v zvezi s preglednostjo informacij o izdajateljih, katerih vrednostni papirji so sprejeti v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu 1 (direktive o preglednosti) in Direktive 2003/6/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2003 o trgovanju z notranjimi informacijami in tržni manipulaciji (zloraba trga) 2 (direktiva o zlorabi trga) ter razjasnijo zadevne težave z diferenciacijo in prekrivanjem, bi morala Komisija pripraviti opredelitev „primarnega trga“, „sekundarnega trga“ in „javne ponudbe“.
(8a) In order to allow for the efficient application of Directive 2003/71/EC, Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market 1 (the Transparency Directive) and Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) 2 (the Market Abuse Directive) and to clarify underlying problems of differentiation and overlaps, the Commission sh ould put forward a definition of 'primary market', 'secondary market' and 'public offer'.
2 UL L 96, 12.4.2003, str.
2 OJ L 96, 12.4.2003, p.