natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Leta 2008 smo skupaj z Evropsko komisijo in ZN organizirali veliko konferenco ob 60. obletnici Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah in ob 10. obletnici sprejema deklaracije ZN o zagovornikih človekovih pravic.
In 2008, we organised together with the European Commission and the UN, a big conference commemorating the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as well as the 10th Anniversary of the adoption of the UN Declaration on human rights defenders.
Evropski parlament zagotavlja javni dostop do skoraj vseh svojih dejavnosti in s tem platformo za razpravo in javne predstavitve zagovornikov človekovih pravic na srečanjih in predstavitvah.
The European Parliament assures public access to almost all its activities, thereby providing a platform for discussion and public presentations of HRDs in meetings and hearings.
Ta vidnost lahko že sama po sebi zagotovi večjo zaščito, lahko pa tudi izpostavi posameznike večjim tveganjem.
This visibility can in itself give increased protection, but can also expose the individuals to increased risks.
Posledica nastopov v Evropskem parlamentu so bile včasih aretacije, eden od najbolj vidnih primerov je bil morda primer Hu Jia.
Appearances in the European Parliament have sometimes resulted in arrests, Hu Jia maybe being one of the most notable cases.
Tesnejše sodelovanje med institucijami EU, npr. da Evropski parlament vnaprej obvesti Evropsko komisijo o obisku zagovornika človekovih pravic, ali večja pripravljenost za spremljanje varnostnega položaja zagovornika, ki nastopa v Evropskem parlamentu, bi lahko bil eden od načinov, kako se bolje spopadati s temi tveganji.
Increased cooperation between the EU institutions, e.g. the European Parliament notifying the European Commission in advance of visiting HRDs, or increased preparedness to follow up on the security situation for HRDs intervening in the EP, could be one way to better deal with these risks.
Kot v vseh izvoljenih skupščinah so besedila, sprejeta z glasovanjem, v primeru Evropskega parlamenta resolucije, najpomembnejši način sporočanja stališča o raznovrstnih zadevah, med drugim tudi človekovih pravicah.
As for all elected assemblies, texts adopted by vote, resolutions in the case of the European Parliament represent the most significant way of communicating its position on a broad range of subjects, including human rights.
Nujne resolucije, ki zdaj temeljijo na členu 122, so še naprej najpogosteje uporabljena pravna podlaga za obravnavo vprašanj s področja človekovih pravic v Evropskem parlamentu in številne izmed njih zadevajo posamezne primere.
Urgent resolutions, now based on rule 122, remain the most used legal basis to address human rights issues within the EP, and many of them deal with individual cases.
V študiji EUIC, ki jo je naročil EP
In the study of EUIC, commissioned by the EP
Številni posamezni primeri se obravnavajo tudi v korespondenci med npr. predsednikom parlamenta ali parlamentarne delegacije ali pododbora za človekove pravice in zadevnimi oblastmi.
Many individual cases are also raised in correspondence, e.g. by the President of the Parliament or the Chair of a parliamentary delegation or the Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights to authorities involved.
Vsi posamezni primeri, ki so predmet resolucije, so našteti v prilogi k letnemu poročilu EP o človekovih pravicah, včasih tudi z navedbo sprejetih pobud.
All individual cases subject to a resolution are listed in an annex to the EP annual report on human rights, sometimes also indicating further initiatives undertaken.
Pogosto bi bilo mogoče tudi bolj sistematično spremljanje in boljše evidentiranje sprejetih ukrepov.
There is however room for a more systematic follow-up and an improved track record of actions undertaken.
Ena od možnosti bi lahko bilo oblikovanje posebne zbirke podatkov, kakršna se trenutno razvija v okviru Sveta.
One possibility could be to create a specific data base, as is currently being developed within the Council.
To bi lahko tudi olajšalo potrebno povečano izmenjavo podatkov o dejavnostih, ki jih opravljajo različne institucije, kot pogosto zahteva Evropski parlament.
This could also facilitate a necessary increased information exchange on activities carried out by the different institutions, as often requested by the European Parliament.
Evropski parlament od leta 1988 podeljuje nagrado Saharova za svobodo misli, ki jo nagrajenci prejmejo za svoja prizadevanja na področju človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
Since 1988, the European Parliament is awarding the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought to laureates for their efforts on behalf of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Odmevnost nagrade v številnih primerih izboljša položaj prejemnikov.
The visibility the prize gives, in many cases improve the situation of the laureates.
Kot so se številni lahko prepričali na konferenci, organizirani leta 2008 ob 20. obletnici nagrade, prinaša priznanje njihovemu delu, ki ga daje nagrada, dejansko podporo in moralno spodbudo, finančna donacija pa prav tako lahko koristi tako prejemniku kot primeru, za katerega se zavzema.
As many of them have witnessed in the conference organised in 2008 on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the prize, the recognition of their work though the award offers real support and 'moral boosting', while the financial grant can be beneficial, both for the laureate and the cause defended.
Z ustanovitvijo mreže Saharova je mogoče upati, da bo Evropski parlament v smislu trajne podpore lahko izboljšal spremljanje in povezavo s prejemniki nagrade Saharova ter bolje izkoristil možni prispevek in razpoložljivost prejemnikov za različne ukrepe.
By the creation of the Sakharov Network, it is also hoped that the European Parliament can improve the follow-up and connection with Sakharov Prize laureates as part of a sustained support, as well as better capitalise on the possible contribution and availabilities of the laureates for different actions.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno želi poročevalka podati naslednja priporočila za politike EU na področju zagovornikov človekovih pravic:
In light of the above, the rapporteur wishes to make the following recommendations on the EU policies on human rights defender s:
· Lizbonska pogodba je nadalje razvila cilje zunanje politike Unije v členih 3 in 21 in postavila uveljavljanje in varstvo človekovih pravic v središče zunanjepolitičnih ukrepov Unije.
· The Treaty of Lisbon further develop the objectives of the Union's foreign policy in its article 3 and 21 and puts the promotion and protection of human rights at the centre of the Union's external action.
Prednost mora imeti zagotavljanje, da se bo uveljavljanje človekovih pravic kot temeljne vrednote in cilja zunanje politike Unije ustrezno zrcalilo v strukturi Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje, vključno s človeškimi viri.
First priority has to be given to ensure that the promotion of human rights as both basic value and objective of the Union's foreign policy be duly mirrored in the structure of the EEAS, including in the human resources.
· Delegacije komisije v tretjih državah bodo postale delegacije Unije, ta postopek je že v teku, in bodo imele ključno vlogo pri predstavljanju EU in izvajanju politike na področju človekovih pravic, iz tega pa sledi, da bodo morale sistematično vključevati visoko kvalificiranega političnega svetnika o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji.
· Commission delegations in third countries will become Union delegations, a process already underway, and will have to play a crucial role in terms of representation of the EU and the implementation of the human rights policy, thereby the need to systematically include a high qualified political councillor on human rights and democracy.
Imenovanje take osebe bi lahko hkrati okrepilo doslednost in prepoznavnost politike EU na področju človekovih pravic, ta oseba pa bi postala osrednja točka za zagovornike človekovih pravic na terenu.
The appointment of such a person could at the same time reinforce the coherence and the visibility of the EU Human Rights Policy and be considered as a focal point for human rights defenders on the ground.
· Delegacije EU v tretjih državah morajo pravilno in v celoti izvajati smernice EU glede zagovornikov človekovih pravic, do konca leta 2010 pa si bo treba še dodatno prizadevati, da se zagotovi razvoj lokalnih strategij.
· The EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders need to be duly and fully implemented by EU Delegations in third countries and by the end of 2010 increased efforts are needed to make sure that they all develop local strategies.
Zato bi bilo zelo priporočljivo, da podpredsednik/visoki predstavnik institucionalizira izdelavo lokalnih strategij, vključno z rednim ocenjevanjem, da bi tako zagotovili večjo doslednost politike Unije in dejansko izvajanje takih zaščitnih ukrepov.
It would therefore be highly recommended that the elaboration of local strategies, including their regular evaluation, is institutionalised by the VP/HR, so as to ensure greater consistency of the Union's policy and a real implementation of such protecting measures.
Vključevanje zagovornikov človekovih pravic v proces priprave in spremljanja lokalnih strategij bo pogojevalo dejansko vrednost teh strategij.
The involvement of human rights defenders into the drafting and monitoring process of local strategies will condition the effective value of these strategies.
Srečanja zagovornikov človekovih pravic z diplomati, načrtovana vsaj enkrat na leto, lahko jasno prispevajo k vzpostavitvi takega procesa.
The meetings of human rights defenders and diplomats planned at least once a year can clearly contribute to the setting-up of such process.
· Seznam lokalnih strategij bi bilo treba poslati Parlamentu ali ga vsaj vključiti v letno poročilo EU o človekovih pravicah.
· The list of local strategies should be provided to the Parliament or at least in the EU annual report on human rights.
V primeru parlamentarne predstavitve bi moral Parlament od vodij delegacij EU zahtevati, da se, preden jih podpredsednik/visoki predstavnik imenuje, jasno zavežejo podpori temu ukrepu.
A clear commitment in favour of this measure by Heads of EU Delegations should be requested in case of parliamentary hearings by Parliament before their appointment by VP/HR.
· Treba je spremeniti sedanji pristop, po katerem se vprašanja v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami ločujejo od vseh drugih vprašanj.
· The current approach consisting in isolating human rights issues from all others has to be reversed.
Spodbujanje in varstvo zagovornikov človekovih pravic je treba vključiti na vseh ravneh in v vse vidike in instrumente zunanje politike Unije, da bi povečali doslednost, učinkovitost in verodostojnost podpore EU zagovornikom človekovih pravic.
The promotion and protection of human rights defenders have to be integrated at all levels and in all aspects and instruments of the Union's Foreign policy in order to increase coherence, effectiveness and credibility of the EU support for HRD.
Sprejem državne strategije za človekove pravice in demokracijo, ki jo je treba šteti za referenčni dokument, ki bo določal prednostne naloge za posamezne države na tem področju in bo vključen v vse ustrezne zunanje politike in instrumente EU za zadevno tretjo državo, bi lahko znatno prispeval k temu ciljno usmerjenemu pristopu.
The adoption of a Country Strategy on Human Rights and Democracy to be considered as a reference document establishing country-specific priorities in this field and mainstreamed into all relevant external EU policies and instruments with the third country concerned could substantially contribute to this targeting approach.
· Glavni vidiki lokalnih strategij za izvajanje Smernic EU glede zagovornikov človekovih pravic bi se morali odražati v državnih strateških dokumentih, akcijskih načrtih ESP in letnih programih akcijskih načrtov EIDHR.
· Major aspects of local strategies for the implementation of the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders should be reflected in Country Strategy papers, ENP Action Plans and Annual Action Programmes of the EIDHR.
Podpora zagovornikom človekovih pravic in njihova zaščita morata zaradi nujnosti ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti, presegati dialoge o človekovih pravicah in pododbore za človekove pravice ESP ter morata biti sistematično visoko na dnevnem redu političnega dialoga s tretjimi državami, vključno s pridružitvenimi odbori in odbori za sodelovanje ter dvostranskimi vrhi.
The support for and protection of human rights defenders must go beyond human rights dialogues and ENP human rights subcommittees considering the urgent character of actions to be taken and have to be systematically high on the agenda of the political dialogue with third countries, including within Association or Cooperation Councils and bilateral Summits.
· EIDHR, ki je že dokazal, da je sposoben podpirati in spodbujati spoštovanje človekovih pravic in krepiti pravno državo, bi moral še naprej krepiti neposredno podporo zagovornikom človekovih pravic.
· The EIDHR which has already demonstrated its capacity to support and promote the respect for human rights and the strengthening of the rule of law should continue to further enhance the direct support for human rights defenders.
· Treba je zgraditi tesnejšo povezavo med dialogi o človekovih pravicah, organiziranimi pred dvostranskimi vrhi, kot so srečanja z zagovorniki človekovih pravic pred vrhom.
· A closer bridge has to be built up between Human Rights dialogues organised prior to bilateral summits, such as the holding of meetings with human rights defenders prior to the summit.
Taki ukrepi bi lahko premostili sedanje omejitve teh dialogov in zagotovili konkretne rezultate in koristi.
This kind of action could overcome the current limits of these dialogues and provide tangible results and usefulness.
· Zagovorniki človekovih pravic, ki so ogroženi v tretjih državah, zahtevajo zlasti več prepoznavnosti in obveščanja o ukrepih EU za vse vrste težkih razmer, s katerimi se srečujejo, vključno z nadlegovanjem, grožnjami in nepoštenim pridržanjem.
· Human rights defenders at risk in third countries mainly ask for more visibility and publicity of EU actions regarding all of kind of difficult situations they can face, including harassments, threats and unfair detention.
Javne ukrepe opredeljujejo kot zaščitne ukrepe.
Public measures are identified by them as protection measures.
V tem smislu bi bilo priporočljivo, da bi zaupne demarše držav članic EU in v bližnji prihodnosti delegacij EU, postale javne in objavljene na spletni strani delegacij ter Sveta in Komisije.
In this sense, it would be recommended that whenever possible, confidential demarches undertaken by EU Member States and in the near future, by EU Delegations, become public and put on the website of these delegations and on those of the Council and the Commission.
Ta odločitev o javni objavi pa bi morala biti vedno v rokah zagovornika človekovih pravic in njegove družine.
The decision to make it public should however always be in the hand of the human rights defender or of his/her family.
· Podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica bi morala na svojih uradnih obiskih v tretjih državah dati najvišjo prednost srečanjem z zagovorniki človekovih pravic.
· The VP/HR should give top priority to meet with human rights defenders when she officially travels in third countries.
Poleg tega bi moral biti ta vidik nujno vključen v mandat posebnih predstavnikov EU.
In addition, this aspect should be imperatively included in the mandate of EUSR.
Podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica in posebni predstavniki EU morajo odgovarjati Parlamentu za ukrepe v zvezi s tem.
Both VP/HR and EUSR should be accountable before Parliament for their action in this regard.
· Samo izdelava celostnega pristopa glede zagovornikov človekovih pravic lahko poveča verodostojnost in učinkovitost politike EU.
· Only the elaboration of a holistic approach towards human rights defenders can increase the credibility and efficiency of the EU policy.
Ta pristop bi moral torej hkrati vključevati podporne ukrepe za zavarovanje njihovih dejavnosti ter preventivne in varovalne ukrepe, ki omogočajo pravočasno ukrepanje.
This approach should therefore include at the same time support measures to secure their activities, as well as preventive and protection measures so as to be able to act in due time.
Upoštevati je treba kratkoročne in dolgoročne potrebe zagovornikov človekovih pravic.
Both short-term and long-term needs of human rights defenders have to be taken into consideration.
Revidirana strategija za EIDHR in smernice EU glede zagovornikov človekovih pravic bi morale odražati ta uravnoteženi pristop.
The revised Strategy for EIDHR and the EU guidelines on human rights defenders should reflect this balanced approach.
· Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba posvetiti varstvu zagovornikov človekovih pravic ne le v njihovih državah, ampak z izdajo vizumov tudi zagovornikom, ki so ogroženi, in v nujnih primerih.
· A special focus should not only be made on the protection of human rights defenders in their own country, but also by the delivery of visas for human rights defenders at risk and emergency situations.
Izdaja tega posebnega vizuma bi morala biti del vizumskega zakonika Skupnosti.
The issue of this specific visa should be incorporated in the Community Code on visas.
· Nujne vizume bi moral spremljati tudi program mest zatočišč, ki bi dopolnjeval obstoječa sredstva in varstvene mehanizme za zagovornike človekovih pravic.
· Urgency visas should also be accompanied by the launching of a programme of shelters cities so as to complement the existing tools and protection mechanisms for human rights defenders.
· Sedanje sodelovanje med obstoječimi zaščitnimi mehanizmi na evropski in mednarodni ravni je treba podpirati in še okrepiti s sistematično izmenjavo informacij in strategij, da se zagotovi boljše dopolnjevanje med njimi.
· The current cooperation between the existing protection mechanisms at the European and international level have to be supported and further strengthened by systematic exchange of information and of strategy so as to ensure a better complementarity between all of them.
Pozdraviti je treba obstoječi delovni skupini za zagovornike človekovih pravic v okviru delovne skupine Sveta za človekove pravice (COHOM) ter Sveta Evrope, pri čemer je za slednjo pristojen komisar za človekove pravice, ki bi morali pri svojem delu sodelovati.
The existing taskforces on human rights defenders both within the COHOM and the Council of Europe, under the responsibility of the Commissioner on Human Rights, have to be welcomed and should work hand in hand.
· Cilj letnih srečanj v zvezi s spodbujanje aktivizma za človekove pravice, ki jih organizira Svet Evrope, in pobud, ki sta jih je sprejela Observatorij za varstvo zagovornikov človekovih pravic, skupni program Mednarodne zveze za človekove pravice (FIDH) in Svetovne organizacije proti mučenju (OMCT), ter Medameriška komisija za človekove pravice (IACHR), je okrepiti sodelovanje med mednarodnimi in regionalnimi mehanizmi in institucijami za varstvo zagovornikov človekovih pravic.
· The annual meetings related to the promotion of human rights activism organised by the Council of Europe and the initiatives taken by the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a joint programme of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) aim at strengthening the interaction and complementarity between international and regional mechanisms and institutions for the protection of human rights defenders.
Treba je nadalje raziskati vse te inovativne pristope, ki temeljijo na okrepljenem sodelovanju med vsemi mehanizmi in institucijami, da bi dosegli v rezultate usmerjeno strategijo glede zagovornikov človekovih pravic.
All of these innovative approaches based on increased cooperation between all mechanisms and institutions have to be further explored in order to enjoy a result-oriented strategy towards human rights defenders.
· V okviru izvajanja Lizbonske pogodbe bi si morale institucije EU posebej prizadevati za vzpostavitev medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja glede zagovornikov človekovih pravic na podlagi medinstitucionalne mreže, ki bi se lahko redno srečevala.
· In the context of the implementation of the Treaty of Lisbon, EU institutions should make special efforts so as to establish an inter-institutional cooperation on human rights defenders based on an inter-institutional network which could meet on a regular basis.
Oblikovanje take mreže bi lahko olajšala ustanovitev osrednjih točk za zagovornike človekovih pravic v Evropskem parlamentu in v Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje.
The creation of such a network could be eased by the setting up of focal points for human rights defenders in the European Parliament and the EEAS.
Treba je raziskati možnost izdelave mehanizma za opozarjanje, ki bi si ga delile institucije EU in vsi drugi varstveni mehanizmi.
The creation of an alert system mechanism to be shared between EU institutions and all other protection mechanism should be explored.
· Hkrati bi bilo treba še natančneje raziskati možnosti mreže Saharova, ki je bila ustanovljena decembra 2008 ob 20. obletnici nagrade Saharova.
· At the same time, the Sakharov Prize network launched in December 2008 at the occasion of the 20th Anniversary of the Sakharov Prize should be further explored.
· Izmenjavo informacij bi olajšala tudi ustanovitev podatkovnih zbirk ali dnevnikov, ki bi olajšali sledenje dejavnostim v teku, zlasti glede posameznikov.
· Information sharing would also be facilitated by the creation of data bases, or "log books", which would make it easier to keep track on activities undertaken, especially in regard to individuals.
Stališče Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 1/2010 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament
Council's position on Draft amending budget No 1/2010 of the European Union for the financial year 2010, Section I – European Parliament
o stališču Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 1/2010 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament
on the Council's position on Draft amending budget No 1/2010 of the European Union for the financial year 2010, Section I – European Parliament
1. , ter zlasti večletnega finančnega okvira, določenega v delu I sporazuma in priloženega v prilogi I sporazuma,
1. , and in particular the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) provided for in Part I thereof and set out in Annex I thereto,
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, kot je bil dokončno sprejet 17. decembra 2009
– having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010, as finally adopted on 17 December 2009
UL L 64, 12.3.2010. ,
OJ L 64, 12.3.2010. ,
– ob upoštevanju predloga načrta prihodkov in odhodkov, ki ga je Parlament sprejel 25. februarja 2010
– having regard to the draft estimates adopted by Parliament on 25 February 2010
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe proračuna št. 1/2010, ki ga je Komisija pripravila dne 19. marca 2010 ( KOM(2010)0107 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 1/2010 drawn up by the Commission on 19 March 2010 ( COM(2010)0107 ),
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 1/2010, ki ga je Svet sprejel 18. maja 2010 (00000/2010),
– having regard to the Council's position on Draft amending budget No 1/2010 established on 18 May 2010 (00000/2010),
– ob upoštevanju členov 75b in 75e svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 75b and 75e of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0158/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0158/2010 ),