natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– po sprejetju sklepa o uporabi sredstev iz ESPG se izplača finančni prispevek zadevni državi članici v enkratnem znesku, načeloma v 15 dneh.
– following the budgetary authority's adoption of the decision to mobilise the EGF, the financial contribution granted to the Member State is paid in a single instalment, in principle within 15 days.
Ali je vedno nujen sklep za uporabo sredstev, ki ga proračunski organ izda za vsak primer posebej?
Is it always essential for the budgetary authority to take mobilisation decisions on a case-by-case basis?
Ali so predvideni roki potrebni in/ali upoštevani?
Are the deadlines necessary and/or met?
Na kakšen način bi za države članice ti pregledi vlog, ki jih izvede Komisija, postali bolj predvidljivi?
How could the scrutiny of applications by the Commission be made more predictable for Member States?
Postopek izvajanja ESPG pa se lahko razčleni v tri faze :
There are three stages in the EGF implementation procedure :
– država članica uporabi finančni prispevek v roku 24 mesecev od datuma vloge ali datuma sprejetih ukrepov, če so se začeli izvajati v teku treh mesecev od datuma vloge (v roku 12 mesecev od datuma vloge pred letom 2009);
– the Member State must use the financial contribution within 24 months of the date on which the application was made or the date on which the measures covered began, provided that the latter date is no later than three months after the date on which the application was made (within 12 months of that date prior to 2009);
– država članica predloži poročilo o izvrševanju finančnega prispevka v roku 6 mesecev od konca določenega datuma uporabe;
– the Member State must submit a report on the implementation of the financial contribution no later than six months after the expiry of the designated utilisation period;
– Komisija poravna finančni prispevek v roku 6 mesecev od prejetja poročila o izvrševanju finančnega prispevka.
– the Commission winds up the financial contribution no later than six months after the implementation report has been received.
Ali je zadostna podvojitev roka uporabe finančnega prispevka za državo članico?
Is the doubling of the period during which the financial contribution may be used by the Member State sufficient?
Ali je nadzorni postopek Komisije za uporabo finančnega prispevka optimalen?
Is the procedure for verification by the Commission of the use made of the financial contribution as effective as it could be?
UPORABA SREDSTEV ESPG MED LETOM 2007 IN APRILOM 2010
MOBILISATION OF THE EGF BETWEEN 2007 AND APRIL 2010
· Analiza sklepov in vlog za uporabo sredstev ESPG
· Analysis of EGF mobilisation decisions and applications
Število vlog in zahtevanih prispevkov je koncentrirano v omejenem številu držav članic, brez povezave z razlikami v bogastvu in stopnjo brezposelnosti .
The number of applications submitted and the size of the contributions requested are not linked to the relative wealth of or unemployment rate in the Member States that have applied for funding, of which there has been only a limited number .
Med letom 2007 in aprilom 2010 je bilo sprejetih 27 sklepov za uporabo sredstev ESPG, sprejetih in obdržanih po je bilo 58 vlog.
Between 2007 and April 2010, 27 EGF mobilisation decisions were adopted, and 58 applications were submitted.
Pet držav članic, ki je predstavilo vloge za najvišje prispevke (Francija, Italija, Španija, Irska in Nemčija), je zahtevalo približno 70 % vseh zahtevanih sredstev, medtem ko je pet držav članic, ki je predstavilo zahteve za najnižje prispevke (Republika Češka, Poljska, Malta, Finska, Litva), zaprosilo za približno 2 % te celote.
The five Member States that requested the highest contributions (France, Italy, Spain, Ireland and Germany) accounted for around 70% of the total appropriations requested, while the five Member States that requested the lowest contributions (Czech Republic, Poland, Malta, Finland and Lithuania) accounted for some 2%.
Sklepi za uporabo sredstev ESPG so zadevali regije na ravni NUTS 2, pri katerih povprečni BND na prebivalca znaša 109,3 % povprečja Evropske unije in pri katerih je povprečna stopnja brezposelnosti samo 5,9 %
The EGF mobilisation decisions covered NUTS II regions with an average per capita GNI of 109.3% of the EU average and an average unemployment rate of no more than 5.9%
Vir: Eurostat, podatki iz leta 2007 za BND na prebivalca in iz leta 2008 za stopnjo brezposelnosti. .
Source: Eurostat – 2007 per capita GNI figures and 2008 unemployment figures. .
Zakaj imajo od ESPG korist predvsem regije, v katerih je BDP na prebivalca večji od povprečja Evropske unije in katerih stopnja brezposelnosti ostaja zmerna, in na kakšen način se lahko reši to razliko?
Why does the bulk of EGF contributions go to regions with a per capita GNI that is higher than the EU average and with a relatively low unemployment rate, and how can this situation be remedied?
Število vlog in zahtevanih prispevkov je predmet vedno večje uporabe sredstev, ampak je omejeno glede na razpoložljiva sredstva .
Although increased use is being made of the EGF, the overall amounts involved account for only a limited proportion of the appropriations available .
Pred revizijo junija 2009 je bilo sprejetih samo 16 sklepov v korist 8 držav članic in v skupnem znesku 80 milijonov EUR.
Only 16 decisions were adopted prior to the June 2009 revision; these concerned eight Member States, and the overall amount mobilised was EUR 80 million.
Primerjava različnih proračunskih let kaže, da je prišlo do povečanja stopnje uporabe, kar je povezano predvsem z večjo prožnostjo načinov uporabe ESPG, ki je bila vpeljana leta 2009, ter z gospodarsko in finančno krizo.
However, a comparison of the figures for the financial years to date shows that increased use is being made of the EGF, owing in particular to the relaxation of the eligibility requirements in 2009 and to the economic and financial crisis.
Stopnja uporabe sredstev se je s 3,7 % v letu 2007 (18,6 milijonov EUR) povečala na 9,8 % v letu 2008 (49 milijonov EUR) in na 10,5 % v letu 2009 (52 milijonov EUR).
The rate of utilisation of appropriations rose from 3.7% in 2007 (EUR 18.6 million) to 9.8% in 2008 (EUR 49 million) and 10.5% in 2009 (EUR 52 million).
Zdi se, da se ta težnja nadaljuje tudi v letu 2010.
This trend would appear to have continued into 2010.
Med junijem 2009 in aprilom 2010 je bilo sprejetih, pregledanih ali vloženih 42 vlog, ki so zadevale 36.712 novih delavcev in 9 dodatnih držav članic, skupni znesek pa je znašal 197 milijonov EUR.
Between June 2009 and April 2010, 42 applications were approved, scrutinised or submitted; these covered 36 712 more workers and nine more Member States, and the overall amount involved was EUR 197 million.
Ali veliko povečanje vlog in zahtevanih prispevkov predstavlja stalen značaj, in če je to tako, na kakšen način lahko to razložimo in se s tem učinkovito soočamo?
Is this substantial increase in the number of applications and the size of the contributions requested likely to continue, and if so, what are its causes and what is the appropriate response?
Prispevek, ki se zahteva na delavca, se zelo razlikuje od ene do druge države članice .
The size of the contributions requested varies sharply from Member State to Member State .
Sprejeti sklepi zadevajo 29.292 odpuščenih delavcev, vložene vloge pa so identificirale 54.867 delavcev, ki jim je treba pomagati.
The decisions adopted cover 29 292 workers made redundant and the applications submitted cover 54 867 workers requiring support.
Zahtevani prispevek predstavlja v povprečju 5.253 EUR na delavca.
The average contribution requested stands at EUR 5 253 per worker.
Obstaja razmerje 1 proti 40 med najnižjim (511 EUR)
There is a ratio of around 1 to 40 between the lowest contribution requested per worker (EUR 511)
ESPG/2010/010, Unilever (Republika Češka). in najvišjim (22.031 EUR)
EGF/2010/010, Unilever (Czech Republic). and the highest (EUR 22 031)
Ali so razlike, ki obstajajo glede finančnega prizadevanja na delavca glede na države članice, v celoti utemeljene in če ne, na kakšen način se to lahko reši?
Are the differences between the Member States in terms of the funding provided per worker fully justified, and if not, what should be done about it?
Vloge za uporabo sredstev ESPG so odvisne od vseh meril za pomoč, ampak v razmerjih, ki niso uravnotežena .
The applications for EGF support are based on all three intervention criteria, although the breakdown between them is uneven .
Države članice se sklicujejo na merilo za pomoč iz člena 2(b) uredbe o ESPG v 57,7 % primerov, na merilo iz člena 2(a) v 36,5 % primerov in na merilo iz člena 2(c) v 5,8 % primerov.
The Member States base their applications on the intervention criterion laid down in Article 2(b) of the EGF Regulation in 57.7% of cases, on the Article 2(a) criterion in 36.5% of cases and on the Article 2(c) criterion in 5.8% of cases.
Samo ena država članica (Litva) se sklicuje na vsa tri merila za pomoč vsaj v eni izmed svojih vlog.
Only one only Member State (Lithuania) has used all three different criteria in its applications.
Od junija 2009 se na merilo za pomoč iz člena 2(b) sklicuje več, kot v preteklem obdobju (v približno 60 % vlog v primerjavi s 50%).
Since June 2009, the Article 2(b) criterion has been cited more often than during the previous period (60% of applications as against 50% previously).
Kako razložiti razlike med državami članicami, kadar gre za uporabo meril?
What are the reasons for the differences between Member States in terms of the criteria cited?
Prispevek ESPG je bil do danes dodeljen le za nekaj gospodarskih sektorjev, čeprav njihovo število sedaj narašča .
To date, EGF contributions have been granted in respect of only a small number of economic sectors, although that number is now growing .
Medtem ko je 16 sklepov, ki so bili sprejeti na podlagi prvotne uredbe, zadevalo izključno tekstilni (50 %), avtomobilski (31 %) sektor in sektor mobilne telefonije (19 %), pa so vloge, predložene na podlagi spremenjene uredbe, odprte za nove sektorje, kot so na primer mehanski, elektronski, tiskarski in gradbeni sektor.
While the 16 decisions adopted under the original regulation were confined to textiles (50%) motor vehicles (31%) and mobile telephony (19%), applications submitted under the amended regulation have covered new sectors such as the mechanical, electronics, printing and construction sectors.
Ali je sektorski vidik vedno utemeljen z upoštevanji, ki so povezana z globalizacijo ali z gospodarsko in finančno krizo?
Are all of the sector-specific applications warranted on the basis of factors relating to globalisation or the economic and financial crisis?
· Analiza postopka za uporabo sredstev in izvajanje ESPG
· Analysis of the EGF mobilisation and implementation procedure
Če ESPG vse do sedaj ni imel lastnih odobritev plačil, pa se bodo lahko razmere spremenile od leta 2011 dalje .
Although, to date, the EGF has not been allocated its own payment appropriations, that situation could change in 2011 .
Vse odobritve plačil, ki so bile uporabljene za soočanje z obveznostmi, so bile vzete iz proračunskih postavk, za katere se je dala predvideti premajhna poraba.
All of the payment appropriations used to meet commitments have been drawn from budget lines likely to be under-utilised.
Potrebe so bile pokrite v višini 97,6 % iz proračunskih vrstic, ki se nanašajo na ESS, preostanek sredstev pa je bil vzet iz proračunske vrstice "Kazensko in civilno pravosodje".
97.6% of requirements have been met using appropriations from ESF budge lines, with the remaining appropriations being drawn from the budget chapter 'Justice in criminal and civil matters'.
Če možnost za vpis odobritev plačil v rezervo poleg odobritev za prevzem obveznosti še ni bila uporabljena, pa predlog proračun za leto 2011 prvič predvideva možnost povečanja vrstice ESPG na 50 milijonov EUR za odobritve plačil.
Although the option of entering payment appropriations in the reserve alongside the corresponding commitment appropriations has not yet been taken up, the draft budget for 2011 provides for the first time for the entry of EUR 50 million in payment appropriations against the EGF budget line.
Kakšne posledice bo imel vpis odobritev plačil na proračunsko vrstico ESPG glede rokov za uporabo sredstev?
What impact will the entry of payment appropriations against the EGF budget line have on mobilisation times?
Trajanje postopka za uporabo sredstev ESPG je predolgo, kar škodi njegovi učinkovitosti in interesu za države članice .
The EGF mobilisation procedure is excessively long, which makes the scheme less effective and less attractive to Member States .
Rok, ki traja od predstavitve vloge za prispevek iz ESPG do nakazila dodeljenega finančnega prispevka v povprečju presega devet mesecev.
On average, following the submission of an application for a financial contribution under the EGF, it takes more than nine months for the contribution to be paid.
Ta rok se lahko razčleni tako:
That time period may be broken down as follows:
– šest mesecev med predstavitvijo vloge države članice in sprejetjem predloga sklepa za uporabo sredstev ESPG s strani Komisije;
– six months between the submission of the application by the Member State and the adoption by the Commission of the proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF;
– dva mesecev med sprejetjem predloga sklepa za uporabo sredstev ESPG s strani Komisije in njenega sprejetja s strani proračunskega organa;
– two months between the adoption by the Commission of the proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF and its adoption by the budgetary authority;
– en mesec in en teden med sprejetjem sklepa za uporabo sredstev ESPG s strani proračunskega organa in nakazilom finančnega prispevka s strani Komisije
– one month and one week between the adoption by the budgetary authority of the decision to mobilise the EGF and the payment of the financial contribution by the Commission
Celotni rok in rok za nakazilo dodeljenega prispevka zadevata samo 15 prvih sklepov za uporabo sredstev ESPG zaradi pomanjkanja informacij glede naknadnih sklepov.
The figures given for the overall time period and the time taken to pay the contribution granted are based on the first 15 EGF mobilisation decisions, since no information on later decisions is available.
Druga dva roka sta izračunana na podlagi vseh sprejetih sklepov. .
The two other time periods were calculated on the basis of all the decisions adopted. .
To zmanjšuje privlačnost ESPG v očeh držav članic, saj te vnaprej financirajo aktivne ukrepe trga dela, ne da bi poznale izid postopka.
This makes the EGF less attractive to Member States, because they are obliged to pre-finance active labour market measures before the outcome of the procedure is known.
To delno razloži razlike, ki so bile ugotovljene med številom delavcev, za katere je bil zahtevan prispevek iz ESPG, in številom delavcev, ki so prejeli pomoč, saj se lahko odpuščeni delavci odločijo za umik s trga dela ali med tem obdobjem že dobijo zaposlitev.
This goes some way towards explaining the disparity between the number of workers for whom an EGF contribution is requested and the number of workers that actually receive support, given that some of the workers made redundant may decide to leave the labour market altogether or may find a new job during that period.
V skrajnem primeru te razlike lahko prisilijo države članice, da v celoti vrnejo dodeljena sredstva, če merilo glede števila delavcev naknadno ni več izpolnjeno.
Such disparities can even result in Member States being required to reimburse all of the contribution they have been granted, because the criterion relating to the number of workers is no longer met by the time the procedure has been completed.
Na kakšen način se lahko zmanjša trajanje postopka za uporabo sredstev ESPG, da bi bil za države članice privlačnejši?
How can the EGF mobilisation procedure be shortened in order to make the fund more attractive to Member States?
(*) Postopek s pridruženim odborom: člen 50 poslovnika
(*) Procedure with associated committees: Article 50 Rules of Procedure
A. ker Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji (ESPG) državam članicam ne določa aktivnih ukrepov na trgu dela, ki bi jih morale izvesti v okviru vloge za uporabo sredstev sklada, pač pa zahteva, da oblikujejo usklajen sveženj posameznikom prilagojenih storitev za ponovno vključitev delavcev na delovni trg v skladu s členom 3 uredbe ESPG
A. whereas the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) does not impose any active labour market measures on a Member State that have to be implemented in the framework of an application for the fund but requires the putting in place of a coordinated package of personalised services designed to reintegrate workers into the labour market in accordance with Article 3 of the EGF regulation
Uredba (ES) št. 1927/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 546/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. junija 2009. , ki v celoti ohranja prožnost držav članic glede prilagajanja ukrepov, namenjenih presežnim delavcem, na lokalne in posamezne potrebe vsake vloge,
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2009 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund as amended by regulation (EC) No 546/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009. which preserves fully the flexibility of the Member States to adapt the measures targeting the redundant workers to the local and individual needs of each application,
3. poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj predlaga spremembe uredbe ESPG za čimprejšnjo pospešitev postopka vlog na kratki rok ter si prizadeva za to, da bi bila sredstva na razpolago v šestih mesecih po odpuščanju, tudi z obravnavo razpoložljivih načinov za sprožitev postopka vloge takoj, ko so odpuščanja napovedana, ne pa ko so že izvedena, ter s čim večjo poenostavitvijo odločanja Evropske komisije in standardizacijo postopkov; prav tako poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj razvije zamisli za naslednji finančni okvir, da bi na eni strani uresničili cilje v zvezi s sodelovanjem z državami članicami ter omogočili v prihodnost usmerjene temeljne spremembe za trajnostno gospodarstvo in delovni trg, na drugi strani pa olajšali hitro in prožno pomoč za presežne delavce zaradi nepredvidenih pretresov v gospodarstvu;
Calls on the European Commission to propose changes to the EGF regulation to speed up the application procedure as much as possible in the short term, working towards the goal of making the funds available within 6 months after redundancy, including by looking into possible ways to start the application procedure the moment the redundancies are announced instead of when they are already effected and by streamlining decision-making of the European Commission as much as possible and to standardise procedures; furthermore calls on the European Commission to develop ideas for the next financial framework to achieve the goals of on the one hand cooperating with Member States to facilitate future-oriented fundamental changes towards a sustainable economy and labour market, and on the other hand facilitating rapid and flexible assistance for redundant workers due to unexpected shocks to the economy;
9. zahteva, da države članice ob posvetovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti s socialnimi partnerji, vzpostavijo komunikacijsko in upravno strukturo za ESPG na nacionalni ravni in izmenjajo najboljše prakse na evropski ravni, kar bo ESPG omogočilo hitro in učinkovito intervencijo v primeru množičnega odpuščanja;
Requests the Member States to put in place a communication and administration structure for the EGF at national level, in consultation with all stakeholders, particularly the social partners, and to exchange good practice at European level, which will allow the EGF to take rapid and effective action in cases of large-scale redundancies;
11. poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predlog, kako bi spremenili uredbo ESPG, da bi v vseh sektorjih in regijah omogočili vključitev vseh delavcev, ki so bili odpuščeni na podlagi enega dogodka;
Asks the Commission to present a proposal on how the EGF regulation should be amended in order to allow the inclusion, across sectors and regions, of all workers made redundant because of the same event;
19. opozarja podjetja, da so družbeno odgovorna narediti vse, kar je v njihovi moči, da že pred začetkom brezposelnosti delavcem zagotovijo potrditev pridobljenih izkušenj in usposabljanj, da bo tako njihovo preusposabljanje kolikor mogoče natančno in hitro, da lahko najdejo novo, dobro, stalno in perspektivno zaposlitev v sektorju, ki se bo obdržal pri življenju;
Reminds undertakings of their social responsibility to do all they can to ensure that, before the start of their period of unemployment, workers can authenticate their experience and training acquired, so as to ensure that their retraining is as specific and as rapid as possible and that they obtain new, ‘good’ stable jobs with a promising future in a sector which will remain viable;
25. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi skladnost politik in instrumentov, s čimer prepreči možnost, da bi prišli cilji s področja rasti in konkurenčnosti v navzkrižje s cilji zaposlovanja, kohezije in socialnega vključevanja;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that its policies and instruments are coherent, in order to preclude the possibility that the growth and competitiveness objectives might conflict with objectives of employment, cohesion and social inclusion;
Edit Bauer, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marije Cornelissen, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Nadja Hirsch, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Jean Lambert, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Rovana Plumb, Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Licia Ronzulli, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Elisabeth Schroedter, Georgios Stavrakakis, Jutta Steinruck
Edit Bauer, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marije Cornelissen, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Nadja Hirsch, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Jean Lambert, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Rovana Plumb, Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Elisabeth Schroedter, Georgios Stavrakakis, Jutta Steinruck
4. poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda merila za upravičenost do sredstev iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji pod zgoraj navedenimi pogoji ter po potrebi občutno poenostavi postopke prijave;
Calls on the Commission to review the criteria for the mobilisation of the EGF, in keeping with the above-mentioned conditions, and to simplify, where necessary, the application procedures significantly;
o vlogi žensk v starajoči se družbi
on the role of women in an ageing society
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 29. aprila 2009 z naslovom „Obvladovanje vpliva staranja prebivalstva v EU (Poročilo o staranju prebivalstva 2009)“ ( KOM(2009)0180 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 29 April 2009 on ‘Dealing with the impact of an ageing population in the EU (2009 Ageing Report)’ ( COM(2009)0180 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 11. maja 2007 z naslovom „Demografska prihodnost Evrope: dejstva in podatki“ ( SEC(2007)0638 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document of 11 May 2007 on ‘Europe’s demographic future: facts and figures’ ( SEC(2007)0638 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. maja 2007 z naslovom „Spodbujati solidarnost med generacijami“ ( KOM(2007)0244 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 10 May 2007 on ‘Promoting solidarity between the generations’ ( COM(2007)0244 ),