natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A. ker je v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča načelo nediskriminacije na podlagi starosti, zagotovljeno v členu 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, splošno načelo zakonodaje Skupnosti,
A. whereas according to the Court of Justice the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age as enshrined in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union constitutes a general principle of Community law,
B. ker je različno obravnavanje na podlagi starosti diskriminacija na tej podlagi, razen če je objektivno utemeljeno, uporabljena sredstva pa so ustrezna in potrebna,
B. whereas a difference in treatment on grounds of age constitutes discrimination on those grounds, unless that difference in treatment is objectively justified and the means to achieve it are appropriate and necessary,
C. ker po mnenju varuha človekovih pravic Komisija ni ustrezno upravičila svojega obravnavanja zunanjih pomožnih konferenčnih tolmačev, starejših od 65 let, in še naprej uporablja svojo politiko zaposlovanja teh tolmačev,
C. whereas according to the Ombudsman the Commission has failed to justify adequately its treatment of freelance auxiliary conference interpreters (ACIs) over 65 years of age, and continues to adhere to its current policy on hiring ACIs,
D. ker varuh človekovih pravic meni, da je to primer nepravilnega ravnanja,
D. whereas the Ombudsman considers that this constitutes an instance of maladministration,
2. poziva Komisijo, naj spremeni sedanjo politiko, ki dejansko prepoveduje zaposlovanje pomožnih konferenčnih tolmačev starejših od 65 let; vendar meni, da v teh okoliščinah izplačilo odškodnine ni utemeljeno;
Calls on the Commission to change its current policy of imposing an effective ban on the recruitment of ACIs over 65 years of age; does not, however, consider that compensation is warranted in the circumstances of this case;
16. januarja 2005 je pritožnik iz pritožbe 186/2005/ELB naslovil pritožbo na Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
On 16 January 2005 the complainant in complaint 186/2005/ELB submitted a complaint to the European Ombudsman.
Pritožnik je več kot 35 let delal za Evropske institucije kot zunanji pomožni konferenčni tolmač, prevajal pa je v francoščino iz nizozemščine, angleščine, nemščine, italijanščine in španščine.
The complainant worked for the European institutions for more than 35 years as a freelance auxiliary conference interpreter ('ACI'), translating into French from Dutch, English, German, Italian and Spanish.
Zunanji tolmači se najamejo za strokovne konference in srečanja.
Freelance interpreters are hired for specific conferences and meetings.
Leta 2004, ko je dopolnil 65 let, je nehal dobivati ponudbe za delo od obeh institucij EU, za kateri je prej delal.
In 2004, when he turned 65, he stopped receiving job offers from the two EU institutions.
Komisija je potrdila, da zunanje tolmače, starejše od 65 let, obravnava drugače, ker mora dati priložnost novim, mladim tolmačem.
The Commission confirmed that it treated freelance conference interpreters over 65 differently because it needed to give opportunities to new, young interpreters.
Varuha človekovih pravic niso prepričali.
The Ombudsman was not convinced.
Priznal je, da je drugačno obravnavanje na podlagi starosti včasih možno upravičiti v določenih okoliščinah, na primer, ko je za določen jezik premalo razpoložljivih tolmačev.
He accepted that different treatment on grounds of age can sometimes be justified under specific circumstances, for instance when there is a shortage of interpreters available in any given language.
V tem primeru pa je popolna prepoved dajanja dela tolmačem, starejšim od 65 let, nesorazmerna in v nasprotju z dobro upravno prakso.
In this case, therefore, a complete ban on giving any work to interpreters over 65 is disproportionate and counterproductive to good administrative practice.
V skladu s členom 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah so prepovedane vse oblike diskriminacije na vseh podlagah, tudi diskriminacija na podlagi starosti.
According to Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, any discrimination, based on any ground, such as discrimination based on age, shall be prohibited.
Poleg tega je v skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča načelo nediskriminacije na podlagi starosti iz člena 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah
Moreover, according to the European Court of Justice, the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age, embodied in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
Prepovedana je vsakršna diskriminacija na podlagi spola, rase, barve kože, etničnega ali socialnega porekla, genetskih značilnosti, jezika, vere ali prepričanja, političnega ali drugega mnenja, pripadnosti narodnostni manjšini, premoženja, rojstva, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti. splošno načelo zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited. , constitutes a general principle of Community law.
V skladu z načelom nediskriminacije Komisija državljanov ne sme obravnavati drugače na podlagi njihove starosti, razen, če dokaže, da je tako obravnavanje objektivno utemeljeno, uporabljena sredstva pa so ustrezna in potrebna.
According to the principle of non-discrimination, the Commission may not treat citizens differently on the basis of their age, unless it shows that such treatment is objectively justified and the means to achieve it are appropriate and necessary.
Komisija je zavrnila oceno varuha človekovih pravic, da je izvajala diskriminacijo ter torej zavrnila izvajanje njegovih priporočil.
The Commission rejected the Ombudsman's assessment that it practiced discrimination and therefore refused to implement his recommendations.
Sedaj njegova politika najemanja temelji le na poklicni sposobnosti tolmačev in na zahtevah službe.
It now bases its hiring policy solely on the professional ability of interpreters and the requirements of the service.
Treba je omeniti, da s tako spremembo pravil glede najemanja zunanjih pomožnih konferenčnih tolmačev, starejših od 65 let, institucije niso primorane, da omenjene tolmače najamejo, saj je namen spremembe preprosto odpraviti vse oblike diskriminacije iz postopka najemanja, izvajati splošno načelo prava Evropske unije in zagotoviti kar najboljše storitve tolmačenja v vseh uradnih jezikih EU.
It should be noted that changing the rules for hiring of ACIs over the age of 65 in this sense does not mean that institutions are under an obligation to hire such ACIs, but it should be done to remove any form of discrimination from the hiring process, to implement a general principle of European Union law and to ensure the best possible service of interpretation in all official languages of the EU.
Komisija se še vedno ni strinjala s stališčem varuha človekovih pravic, da je s tem, ko ni najela zunanjih pomožnih konferenčnih tolmačev, starejših od 65 let, kršila načelo nediskriminacije.
The Commission, meanwhile, continued to disagree with the Ombudsman's view that it breached the principle of non-discrimination when it did not recruit ACIs over 65 years of age.
Poudarila je, da se v skladu s členom 119 pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Skupnosti
It pointed out that, according to Article 119 of the CEOS
Pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Skupnosti. delovno razmerje pogodbenega uslužbenca preneha, ko dopolni 65 let.
Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities. the employment of contractual staff shall cease when the agent reaches the age of 65 years.
V teh okoliščinah in izključno iz pravnih razlogov je Komisija izjavila, da ne more spremeniti svoje politike zaposlovanja.
In these circumstances, and for purely legal reasons, the Commission stated that it could not change its recruitment policy.
Ker se Komisija ni pozitivno odzvala na prizadevanja varuha človekovih pravic, je ta potrdil svoja priporočila Komisiji, v katerih je navedel:
As the Commission failed to respond to the Ombudsman's efforts in a positive way, the Ombudsman confirmed his recommendation to the Commission, stating that:
„Komisija mora spremeniti svojo sedanjo politiko prepovedi zaposlovanja zunanjih pomožnih konferenčnih tolmačev, starejših od 65 let, pritožniku pa mora dati nadomestilo za izgube, ki jih je imel, v tem primeru, zaradi izvajanja te politike.“
"The Commission should change its current policy of imposing a ban on the recruitment of ACIs over 65 years of age and should compensate the complainant for the losses he incurred due to the application, in his case, of that policy."
Varuh človekovih pravic meni, da se s tem primerom odpira pomembno načelno vprašanje.
The Ombudsman considers that this case raises an important issue of principle.
Meni, da Komisija z absolutno prepovedjo najemanja zunanjih pomožnih konferenčnih tolmačev, starejših od 65 let, krši načelo nediskriminacije na podlagi starosti.
He takes the view that the Commission infringes the principle of non-discrimination on the basis of age, by imposing an absolute ban on hiring freelance auxiliary conference interpreters over 65 years of age.
Gre za nepravilnost, katere pomen upravičuje predložitev posebnega poročila Parlamentu.
This constitutes an instance of maladministration, the importance of which justifies the submission of a Special Report to Parliament.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o razveljavitvi 14 zastarelih uredb s področja skupne ribiške politike
on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing 14 obsolete regulations in the field of the Common Fisheries Policy
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2009)0089 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2009)0089 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0095/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0095/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0202/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0202/2009 ),
Razveljavitev 14 zastarelih uredb s področja skupne ribiške politike
Repeal of 14 obsolete regulations in the field of the Common Fisheries Policy
Referenčni dokumenti
Refe rences
Datum posvetovanja z EP
Date of consult ing Parliament
Izid končnega glasovanja
Re sult of final vote
o predlogu Odločbe Sveta o razveljavitvi Direktive 83/515/EGS in 11 zastarelih odločb s področja skupne ribiške politike
on the proposal for a Council decision repealing Directive 83/515/EEC and 11 obsolete decisions in the field of the Common Fisheries Policy
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2009)0088 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2009)0088 ),
– ob upoštevanju drugega odstavka in prve alinee tretjega odstavka člena 37 ter člena 300 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerimi se je posvetoval s Svetom ( C6-0094/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 37, Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0094/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 51 in prvega odstavka člena 43 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 51 and Rule 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0203/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0203/2009 ),
Razveljavitev Direktive 83/515/EGS in 11 zastarelih odločb s področja skupne ribiške politike
Repeal of one directive and 11 obsolete decisions in the field of the Common Fisheries Policy
Referenčni dokumenti
R e f e rences
Datum posvetovanja z EP
Date of consultin g P arliament
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 883/2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (14516/4/2008 – C6-0006/2009 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (14516/4/2008 – C6‑0006/2009 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 9.7.2008, P6_TA(2008)0348 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0016 ),
Texts adopted, 9.7.2008, P6_TA(2008)0348 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0016 ),
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2008)0647 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2008)0647 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6-0204/2009 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0204/2009 ),
(6a) Osebe, ki jih zajema ta uredba, bi morale od pristojnega nosilca dobiti pravočasen odgovor na svojo zahtevo.
(6a) The persons covered by this Regulation should receive from the competent institution a timely answer to their requests.
Odgovor bi moral biti zagotovljen najkasneje v roku, določenem z zakonodajo zadevne države članice na področju socialne varnosti, kadar tak rok obstaja.
The answer should be provided at the latest within the time-limits prescribed by the social security legislation of the Member State in question, where such time-limits exist.
Zaželeno je, da države članice, katerih zakonodaja na področju socialne varnosti ne določa tega roka, razmislijo o njegovem sprejetju in o njem ustrezno obvestijo zadevne osebe.
It would be desirable if Member States whose social security legislation does not make provision for such time-limits considered adopting them and making them available to concerned persons as necessary.
(21) Obveščanje zavarovanih oseb o njihovih pravicah in obveznostih je najpomembnejši element zaupanja v odnosih s pristojnimi organi in nosilci socialne varnosti držav članic.
(21) Informing insured persons of their rights and obligations is a crucial component of a relationship of trust with the competent authorities and the Member States’ institutions.
(21) Obveščanje zadevnih oseb o njihovih pravicah in obveznostih je najpomembnejši element zaupanja v odnosih s pristojnimi organi in nosilci socialne varnosti držav članic.
(21) Informing persons concerned of their rights and obligations is a crucial component of a relationship of trust with the competent authorities and the Member States’ institutions.
Te informacije bi morale zajemati smernice o upravnih postopkih.
Information should include guidance on administrative procedures.
Zadevna oseba je lahko glede na razmere zavarovana oseba, njeni družinski člani in/ali njeni preživeli nasledniki ali druge osebe.
Persons concerned may include, depending on the situation, the insured persons, their family members and/or their survivors or other persons.
Po členu 2(1) osnovne uredbe velja izvedbena uredba za zavarovane osebe, njihove družinske člane oziroma njihove preživele naslednike.
According to Article 2.1 of the basic regulation the Regulation applies to insured persons, their family and/or their survivors.
Naloga nosilcev in javnih organov je zagotoviti informacije, ki bodo zadevni osebi omogočile preveriti njene pravice.
The task of the institutions and authorities is to provide information that allows the person concerned to assess his or her rights.
Da bi ustrezno zagotovili pravico do obveščenosti, je treba prilagoditi besedilo.
In order to guarantee the information right of all possible beneficiaries the wording has to be changed.
Člen 3 – odstavek - 1 (novo)
Article 3 – paragraph - 1 (new)
Države članice zagotovijo, da so potrebne informacije na voljo zadevnim osebam, da bi bile te obveščene o spremembah, ki jih prinašata osnovna in izvedbena uredba, in bi lahko tako uveljavljale svoje pravice.
The Member States shall ensure that the necessary information is made available to the persons concerned in order to inform them of the changes introduced by the basic Regulation and by the implementing Regulation to enable them to assert their rights.
Prav tako zagotavljajo storitve, prijazne do uporabnikov.
They shall also provide for user friendly services.
Besedilo o pravici državljanov do obveščenosti je prestavljeno na vidnejše mesto v prvem delu uredbe.
This text on the citizen's right to information has been moved to a more prominent place early on in the regulation.
Glej predlog spremembe 8.
See Amendment 8.
Zadevni nosilci zadevni osebi brez odlašanja posredujejo informacije in izdajo dokumente, kolikor je to potrebno za uporabo osnovne in izvedbene uredbe.
To the extent necessary for the application of the basic Regulation and the implementing Regulation, the relevant institutions shall without delay forward the information and issue the documents to the persons concerned.
Zadevni nosilci nemudoma in v rokih, določenih v zakonodaji zadevne države članice, zadevni osebi posredujejo informacije in izdajo dokumente, kolikor je to potrebno za uporabo osnovne in izvedbene uredbe.
To the extent necessary for the application of the basic Regulation and the implementing Regulation, the relevant institutions shall forward the information and issue the documents to the persons concerned without delay and in any case within any time limits specified under the legislation of the Member State in question .
Vsi nosilci bi morali upoštevati razumno zamudo, da bi preprečili pretirano dolge čakalne dobe za državljane.
A reasonable deadline should be respected by all institutions, in order to avoid excessively long waiting periods for the citizens.
Če v členu 16 izvedbene uredbe ni določeno drugače, delodajalec oziroma zadevna oseba sama, če ne opravlja dejavnosti kot zaposlena oseba, obvesti pristojnega nosilca v državi članici, katere zakonodaja se uporablja, o osebi, ki opravlja svojo dejavnost v državi članici, ki ni pristojna država članica v skladu z naslovom II osnovne uredbe; če je le mogoče, se o tem obvešča vnaprej.
Unless otherwise provided for by Article 16 of the implementing Regulation, where a person pursues his activity in a Member State other than the Member State competent under Title II of the basic Regulation, the employer or, in the case of a person who does not pursue an activity as an employed person, the person concerned shall inform the competent institution of the Member State whose legislation is applicable thereof, whenever possible in advance.
Ta nosilec da informacije v zvezi z zakonodajo, ki se v skladu s členom 11(3)(b) ali členom 12 osnovne uredbe uporablja za zadevno osebo, brez odlašanja na voljo nosilcu, ki ga imenuje pristojni organ države članice, v kateri se opravlja dejavnost.
That institution shall without delay make information concerning the legislation applicable to the person concerned, pursuant to Article 11(3)(b) or Article 12 of the basic Regulation, available to the institution designated by the competent authority of the Member State in which the activity is pursued.
Ta nosilec da informacije v zvezi z zakonodajo, ki se v skladu s členom 11(3)(b) ali členom 12 osnovne uredbe uporablja za zadevno osebo, brez odlašanja na voljo zadevni osebi in nosilcu, ki ga imenuje pristojni organ države članice, v kateri se opravlja dejavnost.
That institution shall without delay make information concerning the legislation applicable to the person concerned, pursuant to Article 11(3)(b) or Article 12 of the basic Regulation, available to the person concerned and to the institution designated by the competent authority of the Member State in which the activity is pursued.
Člen 86 - odstavek 1 - pododstavek 1
Article 86 ‑ paragraph 1 ‑ subparagraph 1
Najpozneje v četrtem celem koledarskem letu po dnevu začetka veljavnosti izvedbene uredbe upravna komisija predloži poročilo o rokih, določenih v členu 67(2), (5) in (6) izvedbene uredbe.
No later than the fourth full calendar year after the entry into force of the implementing Regulation, the Administrative Commission shall present a report on the time limits set out in Article 67(2), (5) and (6) of the implementing Regulation.
Najpozneje v četrtem celem koledarskem letu po dnevu začetka veljavnosti izvedbene uredbe upravna komisija predloži primerjalno poročilo o rokih, določenih v členu 67(2), (5) in (6) izvedbene uredbe.
No later than the fourth full calendar year after the entry into force of the implementing Regulation, the Administrative Commission shall present a comparative report on the time limits set out in Article 67(2), (5) and (6) of the implementing Regulation.
Kot je Svet pravilno ugotovil, je logično določiti roke na podlagi izkušenj in v skladu s tehnološkim napredkom, ki bo verjetno pospešil izmenjave med nosilci, v postopku pregleda pa je smiselno uporabiti tudi dobre prakse iz primerjalnega poročila.
As the Council rightly stated that it is logical to fix the deadlines ‘in the light of the experience and of the technological progress which is likely to make the exchanges between institutions faster’ it is also obvious to use good practices based on a comparative report in the review process.
Člen 86 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 86 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Upravna komisija obenem oceni tudi pravila za pretvorbo dob, določenih v členu 13, zaradi morebitne poenostavitve določb iz tega člena.
At the same time the Administrative Commission shall also assess the rules for conversion of periods set out in Article 13 with a view to their possible simplification.
Člen 89 – odstavek 3
Article 89 – paragraph 3
Države članice zagotovijo, da so potrebne informacije na voljo osebam, ki jih zajema osnovna uredba, da bi bile te obveščene o spremembah, ki jih prinašata osnovna uredba in izvedbena uredba, in bi lahko tako uveljavljale svoje pravice.
The Member States shall ensure that the necessary information is made available to the persons covered by the basic Regulation in order to inform them of the changes introduced by the basic Regulation and by the implementing Regulation to enable them to assert their rights.
Člen 89(3) določa pravico državljanov do obveščenosti.
Art. 89 para 3 asserts the citizen's right to information.
Poročevalka zelo odobrava, ker je Svet uporabil večino predlogov sprememb, zlasti besedilo Parlamenta o načelih v zvezi s sodelovanjem za izvajanje.
The Rapporteur welcomes very much that the Council has taken on board the majority of the amendments, particularly Parliament text concerning the principles underlying the co-operation for implementation.
Poleg tega pozdravlja tudi priznanje potrebe po zagotavljanju dostopnih informacij in omejitvi podatkov zgolj na to, kar je res potrebno.
Also, I welcome the recognition of the need to provide accessible information and to limit data to a minimum of what is really needed.
Vendar bi želeli dodatno pojasniti pravice, ki jih imajo posamezniki in ki so v besedilu večkrat omenjene, vendar niso konsolidirane: odtod poročevalkini predlogi sprememb.
However, we would like to further clarify the rights that individuals have, which are mentioned throughout the text but not consolidated: hence your Rapporteur's proposed amendment.
Kar zadeva čas, ki je potreben za odgovor na posamezne zahteve, še vedno obstajajo nekateri pomisleki, zaradi česar se predlaga nova uvodna izjava 6, členu 86 pa je dodan odstavek.
As concerns the time taken to respond to individual requests there are still concerns which have lead to suggesting a new recital 6 and to adding a paragraph to Article 86.
Razumljivo je, da je potrebno prehodno obdobje za vzpostavitev elektronske izmenjave podatkov in da bi lahko to vplivalo na roke.
It is understandable that there is a need for a transitional period to put electronic data exchange in place and that this might affect deadlines.
Poleg tega načeloma pozdravljamo nov sistem in se zavedamo, da so države članice dosegle velik napredek.
Also, we welcome the new system in principle and appreciate it is a major undertaking on behalf of Member States.