natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- ob upoštevanju obiska preiskovalne delegacije Odbora za proračunski nadzor na Kosovu
- having regard to the visit of a fact-finding delegation of its Committee on Budgetary Control to Kosovo
V skladu z resolucijo Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1244/1999. od 22. do 25. junija 2008 in ustreznega poročila o misiji
Under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244/1999. from 22 to 25 June 2008, and to the relevant mission report
1. , zlasti člena 53 te uredbe, ter njenih izvedbenih pravil,
1. , and in particular Article 53 thereof, and to its implementing rules,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0181/2009 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0181/2009 ),
A. ker je instrument za predpristopno pomoč nov finančni instrument, ki bo nadomestil instrumente in programe za države kandidatke in potencialne kandidatke, kot so Phare, SAPARD, ISPA, predpristopna finančna pomoč za Turčijo in CARDS, ter na prožen način prilagodil sklade EU posebnim potrebam in upravni zmogljivosti teh držav,
A. whereas the IPA is the new financial instrument that replaces the instruments and programmes for candidate and potential candidate countries, namely Phare, SAPARD, ISPA, pre-accession financial assistance for Turkey, and CARDS, and aims to streamline EU funds in a flexible way to the specific needs and management capacity of these countries,
B. ker je instrument za predpristopno pomoč sestavljen iz naslednjih petih sestavnih delov, ki zajemajo prednostne naloge, opredeljene v skladu s potrebami držav upravičenk, zlasti:
B. whereas the IPA consists of the following five components covering priorities defined according to the needs of the beneficiary countries, namely:
I. pomoč pri prehodu in vzpostavljanje institucij,
I. Transition Assistance and Institution Building,
IV. razvoj človeških virov,
Human Resources Development,
V. razvoj podeželja,
V. Rural Development,
C. ker je instrument za predpristopno pomoč osrednji dejavnik za izboljšanje kakovosti življenja državljanov, socialnih standardov, infrastrukture ter regionalnega in čezmejnega sodelovanja, in za spodbujanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic v državah kandidatkah in potencialnih državah kandidatkah,
C. whereas the IPA is a key factor for improving the quality of life of citizens, social standards, infrastructure and regional and cross-border cooperation, and for promoting respect for human rights in candidate and potential candidate countries,
D. ker namen parlamentarnega nadzora nad izvajanjem proračuna na področju širitve ni le zagotoviti porabo sredstev EU v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi in politikami EU, pač pa tudi oceniti, ali so bila sredstva učinkovito dodeljena prednostnim nalogam, opredeljenim v strategiji in poročilih o napredku za države upravičenke, in ali so dosegle želene rezultate glede skupnih interesov EU,
D. whereas the purpose of parliamentary control over the implementation of the budget in the area of enlargement policy is not only to ensure that EU funds have been used in accordance with the governing provisions and with the policies of the EU, but also to assess whether they have been effectively allocated to the priorities identified in the strategy and progress reports for the beneficiary countries and whether they have achieved the desired results in view of common EU interests,
E. ker je bistveno, da se izjemno natančno in v zgodnji fazi preveri izvajanje instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, s čimer se preprečijo težave, ki so bile prepozno odkrite med izvajanjem prejšnjih instrumentov za predpristopno pomoč, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se bodo nepravilnosti, ki niso bile pravočasno upoštevane, pomnožile in da jih bo kasneje zelo težko obravnavati, saj bodo postale stalne malomarnosti,
E. whereas it is vital to examine rigorously and at an early stage the implementation of the IPA so as to avoid the problems that were identified belatedly in the implementation of previous pre-accession instruments, bearing in mind that irregularities not taken into consideration in due time will multiply and that it will be very difficult to deal with them later as they will assume the form of permanent malpractices,
F. ker boj proti korupciji in sektorske reforme (pravosodje, policija in javna uprava) ne vplivajo le na dobro vodenje in načela pravne države, ampak tudi na splošno poslovno ozračje,
F. whereas the fight against corruption and the sectoral reforms (judicial, police and public administration) have a bearing not only on good governance and the rule of law but also on the general business climate,
G. ker instrument za predpristopno pomoč zlasti po zaslugi pregleda dokumentov večletnega orientacijskega načrtovanja nudi precejšnjo prilagodljivost in ga je mogoče prilagoditi razvijajočim se potrebam in upravni zmogljivosti držav upravičenk,
G. whereas the IPA, notably through the review of Multi-annual Indicative Planning Documents (MIPDs), offers considerable flexibility allowing for adaptation to the evolving needs and managing capacity of the beneficiary countries,
H. ker mora Komisija v skladu s členom 27 Uredbe (ES) št. 1085/2006 (uredba o IPA) Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu do 31. decembra 2010 predložiti vmesno ocenjevalno poročilo o izvajanju instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, po potrebi skupaj z zakonodajnim predlogom za spremembo te uredbe,
H. whereas, under Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 (IPA Regulation), the Commission is obliged to submit to the European Parliament and the Council, by 31 December 2010, a mid-term evaluation report on the implementation of the IPA, accompanied if appropriate by a legislative proposal to amend that Regulation,
I. ker je Komisija na zahtevo Parlamenta že leta 2009 začela izvajati vmesni pregled svežnja instrumentov za zunanjo pomoč, vključno z instrumentom za predpristopno pomoč,
I. whereas, further to Parliament’s request, the Commission has undertaken to carry out already in 2009 a mid-term review of the package of external aid instruments, including the IPA,
J. ker bi moral Parlament od sedaj dalje komunicirati z nacionalnimi parlamenti držav upravičenk v okviru instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč,
J. whereas the Parliament should, from now on, communicate with the national parliaments of the beneficiary countries under the IPA,
1. pozdravlja strukturiran dialog s Komisijo o izvajanju instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč in v zvezi s tem opozarja na svoje stališče, da je zlasti treba vsem državam upravičenkam omogočiti enak dostop do vseh političnih orodij, ki so razpoložljiva v instrumentu, dati ustrezno prednost boju proti korupciji in organiziranemu kriminalu ter posvetiti večjo pozornost vzpostavljanju institucionalnih zmogljivosti, zlasti parlamentarnih, razvoju organizacij civilne družbe, ukrepom za spodbujanje strpnosti in nediskriminacije, človekovemu razvoju in regionalnemu sodelovanju na ključnih političnih področjih;
Welcomes the structured dialogue established with the Commission on the implementation of the IPA, and recalls its position in this respect, notably the need to grant all beneficiary countries equal access to the full range of policy tools available under the instrument, to give adequate priority to the fight against corruption and organised crime and to pay increased attention to institutional capacity-building, particularly at parliamentary level, development of civil society organisations, measures to promote the principle of tolerance and non-discrimination, human development and regional cooperation in key policy areas;
4. meni, da je bila povezanost med nacionalnimi programi IPA v letu 2007 in predpristopno politiko EU zadostna, saj je bila večina v programih določenih ciljev v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami, opredeljenimi v ustreznih poročilih Komisije o napredku;
Considers that there was satisfactory coherence between the 2007 IPA national Programmes and the EU pre-accession policy, as most of the objectives set out in the Programmes were in line with the priorities identified in the respective Commission Progress Reports;
9. poudarja, da je uporaba instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč deljena odgovornost med Komisijo in nacionalnimi vladami držav kandidatk in potencialnih držav kandidatk; poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša sodelovanje in komunikacijo med njenimi delegacijami in zadevnimi organi, vzpostavi stalno kontrolo izvedbenih postopkov projektov in si prizadeva za skupne ukrepe za izboljšanje upravne zmogljivosti držav upravičenk;
Emphasises that the use of the IPA is a shared responsibility between the Commission and the national governments of the candidate and potential candidate countries; calls on the Commission to improve the cooperation and communication between its delegations and the respective authorities, to establish permanent control over the project implementation procedures and to work towards common measures for improving the administrative capacity of beneficiary countries;
12. ugotavlja, da horizontalna vprašanja, kot so presoja vpliva na okolje, dobro vodenje, udeležba civilne družbe, enake možnosti in nediskriminacija, v projektih IPA v letu 2007 niso dovolj prisotna in prepoznavna; poziva Komisijo, naj razvije predvsem regionalne ali horizontalne programe z več upravičenci, zlasti v zvezi z bojem proti korupciji in organiziranemu kriminalu, medkulturnim dialogom in enakostjo spolov;
Notes that horizontal issues, such as environmental impact assessment, good governance, civil society involvement, equal opportunities and non-discrimination, are not sufficiently present and visible in the 2007 IPA projects; invites the Commission to develop, in particular, multi-beneficiary regional or horizontal programmes, notably on the fight against corruption and organised crime, intercultural dialogue and gender equality;
Ugotovitve, ki se nanašajo na posamezne politike in države
Policy and country specific observations
Projekt 2007/19300: Boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in korupciji.
Project 2007/19300: Fight against organised crime and corruption.
Cilj tega projekta je boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu s povečanjem učinkovitosti organov pregona in izboljšanjem sodelovanja med njimi.
This project aims to combat organised crime and corruption by improving the performance and cooperation of the various law enforcement agencies involved.
Projekt je del obsežnejšega akcijskega načrta in strategije vlade za boj proti korupciji.
It is linked to the wider Government Anti-Corruption Strategy and Action Plan.
Za ta projekt je predvidenih 3.000.000 EUR. , in poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s tem oblikuje skladnejšo strategijo, pri tem pa se opira na izkušnje, pridobljene ob prejšnjih širitvah;
EUR 3 000 000 have been earmarked for this project. and calls on the Commission to develop a more coherent strategy in this context, building upon the lessons learnt from the last enlargement rounds;
Iz Resolucije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1244/1999 ; od novega mehanizma za spodbujanje razvoja civilne družbe pričakuje, da se bo spopadel z več težavami s področja raznolikosti, kompleksnosti in razpršenosti programov EU;
Under UNSCR 1244/1999. ; expects the new Civil Society Facility to tackle many of the problems with regard to the diversity, complexity, and fragmentation of EU programmes;
18. meni, da ni bilo ustrezne obravnave izobraževanja in zaposlovanja mladih kot predpogojev za dolgoročno stabilnost in razvoj; poudarja potrebo po boju proti brezposelnosti, zlasti brezposelnosti mladih in dolgoročni brezposelnosti, ki je izjemno pomembno medsektorsko vprašanje; v zvezi s tem predlaga, da Komisija preuči možnosti za boljšo uporabo prilagodljivosti, ki jo nudi IPA, da bo mogoče po potrebi iz prvih dveh komponent financirati tudi ukrepe, povezane s komponentami III-V;
Considers that education and youth employment as preconditions for long-term stability and development have not been adequately addressed; highlights the need to combat unemployment, especially youth and long-term unemployment, as a cross-cutting issue of great importance; suggests in this regard that the Commission examines the possibility of making greater use of the flexibility provided for in IPA so as to allow funding, where appropriate, of measures related to components III-V through the first two components;
Pravna podlaga in cilj
Legal base and objective
Instrument za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) je bil vzpostavljen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1085/2006 z dne 17. julija 2006 in je nadomestil prejšnje finančne instrumente in programe za predpristopno pomoč (Phare, SAPARD, ISPA, CARDS in predpristopna finančna pomoč za Turčijo).
The Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA) was established by Council Regulation (EC) N° 1085/2006 of 17 July 2006 and replaced the former pre-accession financial instruments and programmes (Phare, SAPARD, ISPA, CARDS and pre-accession financial assistance for Turkey).
Njegov cilj je zagotoviti usmerjeno pomoč državam kandidatkam in državam potencialnim kandidatkam, tako da se skladi EU na prožen način prilagodijo posebnim potrebam in upravni zmogljivosti teh držav.
Its aim is to provide targeted assistance to candidate and potential candidate countries, by streamlining in a flexible way the EU funds to their specific needs and management capacity.
Pomoč pri prehodu in vzpostavljanje institucij: namenjena financiranju ukrepov za izgradnjo institucij in s tem povezanim naložbam.
I. Transition Assistance and Institution Building, aimed at financing institution building measures and associated investment.
Čezmejno sodelovanje: namenjena podpori čezmejnega sodelovanja na mejah med državami kandidatkami in potencialnimi državami kandidatkami ter na mejah med njimi in državami EU.
Cross-Border Co-operation (CBC), to support cross-border cooperation at borders between candidate/potential candidate countries and between them and the EU countries.
Iz te komponente je mogoče financirati tudi sodelovanje držav upravičenk v nadnacionalnih programih sodelovanja v strukturnih skladih in programih morskih bazenov v okviru evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta.
It may also fund participation of beneficiary countries in Structural Funds' trans-national co–operation programmes and the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) Sea Basins programmes, as appropriate.
Regionalni razvoj: omogoča financiranje investicij in s tem povezane tehnične podpore na področjih, kot so transport ter okoljska in regionalna konkurenčnost.
Regional Development, which can finance investments and associated technical assistance in areas such as transport, environment and regional competitiveness.
Razvoj človeških virov: komponenta, predvidena za krepitev človeškega kapitala in pomoč pri boju proti izključenosti.
Human Resources Development, designed to strengthen human capital and help combat exclusion.
Zamude pri vpeljavi in izvajanju instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč
Delays in the introduction and implementation of IPA
Uredba o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč in Uredba o izvajanju instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč sta bili sprejeti dokaj pozno, in sicer 17. julija 2006 ter 12. junija 2007.
Both the IPA Regulation and implementing Regulation were adopted rather late, on 17 July 2006 and 12 June 2007 respectively.
Poleg tega zaradi dodatnih zamud pri sporazumu o novem finančnem okviru 2007–2013 ni bil predstavljen večletni orientacijski finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2009, prvi večletni orientacijski finančni okvir v okviru instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, ki pokriva obdobje 2008–2010 pa je bil sprejet 6. novembra 2007.
In addition, due to further delays in the agreement of the new Financial Framework for 2007-2013, there was no Multi-annual indicative Financial Framework (MIFF) presented for 2007-2009, and the first MIFF under IPA, which covers 2008-2010, was adopted on 6 November 2007.
Zaradi tega so bili dokumenti večletnega orientacijskega načrtovanja in nacionalni programi IPA 2007 sprejeti šele ob koncu leta 2007, izvedeni pa leta 2008.
Subsequently, the Multi-annual Indicative Planning Documents (MIPDs) and the IPA 2007 national programmes were only adopted at the end of 2007 and implemented in 2008.
Posledično sta bila nadzor in vrednotenje programov in projektov IPA v letu 2007 zelo omejena in še nista prinesla rezultatov, kakor je navedeno v skopih informacijah, ki so na voljo o letnem poročilu Evropske komisije o instrumentu za predpristopno pomoč za leto 2007.
As a consequence, the monitoring and evaluation of IPA programmes and projects carried out in 2007 was very limited and has not yet yielded results, as illustrated in the limited information available on the European Commission's 2007 annual IPA report.
Omeniti velja, da iz naslova komponente II instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč v letu 2007 ni bilo izvršenih plačil, za Albanijo, Hrvaško, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Črno Goro, Srbijo in Turčijo pa sploh ni bilo izvršenih nikakršnih plačil.
It is worth noting that there were no payments executed in 2007 under the IPA component II and no payments whatsoever were executed for Albania, Croatia, fYROM, Montenegro, Serbia or Turkey.
Prehod s prejšnjih finančnih instrumentov za predpristopno pomoč na IPA
Transition from former pre-accession financial instruments to IPA
Odbor za proračunski nadzor Evropskega parlamenta se jasno zaveda težav, do katerih je prihajalo pri izvajanju prejšnjih instrumentov za predpristopno pomoč (še posebej programov Phare in SAPARD v sedanjih državah članicah Bolgariji in Romuniji), pa tudi strukturnih izzivov, s katerimi se še zmeraj soočajo države kandidatke in potencialne kandidatke (glej poročilo preiskovalne misije odbora CONT na Kosovu)
The Committee on Budget Control of the European Parliament is acutely aware of the problems faced in the implementation of previous pre-accession instruments (especially Phare and SAPARD in current Member States Bulgaria and Romania), but also of the structural challenges that the candidate and potential candidate countries still face (cf. the report of the CONT fact finding mission in Kosovo
Iz Resolucije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1244/1999 (UNSCR 1244/1999). .
Under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244/1999 (UNSCR 1244/1999). ).
Zaradi tega je bistvenega pomena natančno in dovolj zgodaj preučiti izvajanje instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč ter tako aktivno preprečiti, da bi se navedene težave ponovile.
It is therefore vital to examine rigorously and already at an early stage the implementation of IPA, so as to proactively prevent that these problems occur again.
Ključno vprašanje pri tem je, kako najti pravilno razmerje med učinkovito zaščito finančnih interesov EU ter zmanjšanjem potrebe po naknadnem umiku podelitve upravnih pooblastil organom v državah upravičenkah, če jih ti ne uspejo učinkovito izvajati.
The key issue at stake is how to strike a balance between effectively safeguarding the EU's financial interests and minimizing the need to withdraw ex-post the conferral of management powers to the authorities of the beneficiary countries, in case that the latter fail to exercise effectively these powers.
Ocenjevanje in pregled instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč
Evaluation and review of IPA
Glede na zgoraj navedene podatke in z ozirom na to, da je IPA v svoji zasnovi in strukturi izjemno prilagodljiv finančni instrument, ki omogoča pogoste preglede programov in dokumentov večletnega orientacijskega načrtovanja, pa tudi vmesno ocenjevanje same Uredbe o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, je bistvenega pomena, da Parlament redno nadzira izvajanje instrumenta IPA, pri tem pa se zanaša na izkušnje, pridobljene med izvajanjem prejšnjih instrumentov ter izvajanjem trenutnega instrumenta IPA, ter zagotovi, da bodo izkoriščene vse možnosti, ki jih ponuja.
In view of the above, and given that IPA is in its conception and structure a very flexible financial instrument, providing for frequent review of the programmes and MIPDs as well as a mid-term evaluation of IPA Regulation itself, it is vital that Parliament regularly monitors the implementation of IPA, so as to build upon the lessons learnt from the previous instruments and current implementation of IPA and ensure that its full potential will be developed.
V prvem letu priprav in izvajanja je IPA, kot kaže, dovolj osredotočen na prednostne naloge, opredeljene v poročilih o napredku v državah upravičenkah in celotni strategiji širitve.
In its first year of programming and implementation, IPA appears to be sufficiently focused on the priorities identified in the progress reports of the beneficiary countries and the overall enlargement strategy.
Kljub temu pa se je treba z večjo učinkovitostjo lotiti nekaterih vprašanj, kot so boj proti korupciji in organiziranemu kriminalu, brezposelnost ter pravice žensk, in jih sistematično vključiti v vse dejavnosti, tako na nacionalni kot na regionalno-horizontalni ravni.
Nevertheless, certain issues, such as the fight against corruption and organized crime, unemployment and women's rights, need to be addressed more effectively and mainstreamed, both at the national level and at the regional-horizontal level.
Prav tako je treba dodatno razviti komponento čezmejnega sodelovanja, pa tudi regionalne in horizontalne programe z več upravičenci.
Furthermore, the cross-border cooperation component as well as the multi-beneficiary regional and horizontal programmes need to be developed further.
V spodnji tabeli so navedena sredstva v milijonih evrov, dodeljena v okviru instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč v letu 2007, razvrščena po državi in komponenti, pa tudi sredstva za regionalne in večdržavne programe, kakor so bila posodobljena v večletnem orientacijskem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2008–2010 (KOM(2007)689, sprejet 6. novembra 2007).
The following table provides the 2007 IPA allocations in million euros by country and by component, as well as for the regional and multi-country programmes as updated in the 2008-2010 MIFF (COM(2007)689 adopted on 6 November 2007).
Komponenta IPA
Component IPA
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija
former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Regionalni in horizontalni programi
Regional & Horizontal programmes
Komponenta I
Component I
Komponenta II
Component II
Komponenta III
Component III
Komponenta IV
Component IV
Komponenta V
Component V
Del IV: finančni podatki iz priloge k poročilu IPA 2007 so navedeni spodaj:
Part IV: Financial Data, from the annex to the IPA 2007 report, is reproduced here:
Leta 2007 je bilo iz proračuna EU za operativne programe v okviru instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč namenjenih 1218,4 milijona EUR.
In 2007, € 1218.4 million was allocated from the EU budget to operational programmes under the Instrument for Pre-Accession assistance.
Skupna stopnja uporabe je bila 100-odstotna, čeprav je bilo 50,2 milijona EUR (4 %) prenesenih v proračun za 2008, zanje pa so bile prevzete obveznosti do marca 2008.
Overall the execution rate was 100 %, although € 50.2 million (4 %) of this was carried forward to the 2008 Budget and committed by March 2008.
Do tega je prišlo zaradi 8 programov
This related to 8 programmes
Preneseni so bili naslednji programi: čezmejno sodelovanje Madžarska-Hrvaška; čezmejno sodelovanje Slovenija-Hrvaška; čezmejno sodelovanje Madžarska-Srbija; čezmejno sodelovanje Romunija-Srbija; čezmejno sodelovanje Bolgarija-Srbija; čezmejno sodelovanje Jadran; SIGMA 2007; dodatna sredstva za sodelovanje pri Evropskem skladu za jugovzhodno Evropo. in priprav nanje, ki so šele konec leta prešle v zaključno fazo, zaradi česar je zmanjkalo časa za sprejetje še v 2007.
Programmes carried-forward were: CBC Hungary-Croatia; CBC Slovenia-Croatia; CBC Hungary-Serbia; CBC Romania-Serbia; CBC Bulgaria-Serbia; CBC Adriatic; SIGMA 2007; additional funds for participation in the European Fund for Southeast Europe. for which preparations were finalised towards the very end of the year following which there was no time for adoption in 2007.
Ker je bila večina programov IPA sprejeta šele ob koncu leta, je bila poraba sredstev za plačila nižja od napovedi v PPP 2007.
Due to the adoption of most of the IPA programmes late in the year, the consumption of payment credits was lower than the forecasts made in the PDB 2007.