natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(3c) Da bi zagotovili sorazmeren in prilagojen pristop k različnim konkurenčnim pogojem, morajo biti nacionalni regulativni organi zmožni opredeliti trge na podnacionalni ravni in/ali ukiniti regulativne obveznosti na trgih in/ali geografskih območjih, kjer obstaja učinkovita infrastrukturna konkurenca, četudi le ti niso opredeljeni kot ločeni trgi.
( 3c) In order to ensure a proportional and adapted approach to varying competitive conditions, national regulatory authorities should be able to define markets on a sub-national basis and/or lift regulatory obligations in markets and/or geographic areas where there is effective infrastructure competition, even if they are not defined as separate markets.
(3d) Ključno vprašanje v naslednjih letih za dosego ciljev Lizbonske pogodbe je dajanje primernih spodbud za naložbe v nova visokohitrostna omrežja, ki bodo podpirala inovacije na področju vsebinsko bogatih internetnih storitev in krepila mednarodno konkurenčnost Evropske unije.
(3d) A key issue for the coming years in order to achieve the goals of the Lisbon Agenda is to give appropriate incentives for investments in new high speed networks that will support innovation in content-rich internet services and strengthen international competitiveness of the European Union.
Takšna omrežja imajo izjemen potencial, da lahko koristijo potrošnikom in poslovni dejavnosti po vsej Evropski uniji.
Such networks have enormous potential to deliver benefits to consumers and business across the European Union.
Zato je ključnega pomena, da se zagotovijo trajnostne naložbe v razvoj teh omrežij, hkrati pa se prek regulativne predvidljivosti in doslednosti ščiti konkurenca ter veča izbira za potrošnike.
It is therefore vital to foster sustainable investment in the development of these new networks, while safeguarding competition and boosting consumer choice through regulatory predictability and consistency.
(3e) Komisija v svojem sporočilu „Premoščanje širokopasovne vrzeli“ z dne 20. marca 2006 ugotavlja, da v Evropski uniji obstaja teritorialna vrzel pri dostopu do širokopasovnih storitev z visoko hitrostjo prenosa.
(3e) In its Communication “Bridging the Broadband Gap” of 20 March 2006, the Commission acknowledged that there is a territorial divide in the European Union regarding access to high speed broadband services.
Kljub splošnemu povečanju števila širokopasovnih priključkov pa je dostop v različnih regijah omejen zaradi visokih stroškov, ki so posledica nizke gostote prebivalstva in oddaljenosti.
Despite the general increase in broadband connectivity, access in various regions is limited because of high costs due to low density of population and remoteness.
Spodbujanje komercialnih naložb v širitev širokopasovnih storitev v teh območjih pogosto ne zadostuje.
Commercial incentives to invest in broadband deployment in these areas often turn out to be insufficient.
Po drugi strani pa tehnološke inovacije zmanjšujejo stroške uvajanja.
On the positive side, technological innovation is reducing deployment costs.
Da bi se zagotovilo vlaganje v novo tehnologijo v nerazvitih regijah, mora biti uredba o elektronskih komunikacijah skladna z drugimi že sprejetimi političnimi ukrepi, kot je politika državne pomoči, strukturni skladi in širši cilji industrijske politike.
In order to ensure that investment in new technologies in underdeveloped regions is ensured, electronic communications regulation should be consistent with other policy measures taken, such as state aid policy, structural funds or wider industrial policy aims.
Regulativni okvir mora upoštevati, da je treba zmanjšati regionalne vrzeli v razvoju.
The regulatory framework should also take into account the need for closing regional gaps in development.
Treba je poudariti poseben pomen vzpostavitve širokopasovnosti.
The specific importance of broadband roll out should be emphasised.
(3f) Naložbe v raziskave in razvoj so ključne za razvoj naslednje generacije optičnih omrežij in za doseganje prožnega in učinkovitega radijskega dostopa, kar spodbuja izboljšanje konkurence ter inovativnih aplikacij in storitev v korist potrošnika.
(3f) Investment in R&D is of vital importance for the development of next generation fibre optics networks and for achieving flexible and efficient radio access thereby favouring enhanced competition and innovative applications and services to the benefit of consumers.
Izziv je vzpostavitev naslednje generacije povsod prisotnih in konvergentnih infrastruktur za omrežja in storitve na področju elektronskih komunikacij, informacijske tehnologije in medijev.
The challenge is to deliver the next generation of ubiquitous and converged network and service infrastructures for electronic communications, IT and media.
Ureditev mora spodbujati naložbe v raziskave in razvoj za vzpostavitev naslednje generacije žičnega in brezžičnega omrežja.
Regulation has to favour investment in R&D for developing next generation wireline and wireless networks.
(3g) Javna politika bi morala dopolnjevati učinkovito delovanje trgov elektronskih komunikacij in posredovati med ponudbo in povpraševanjem, da se spodbudi pozitivna dinamika, ki omogoča, da je razvoj boljših vsebin in storitev odvisen od vzpostavljanja infrastrukture in obratno.
(3g) Public policy should play a role in complementing the effective functioning of the electronic communications markets, addressing both the supply and demand side to stimulate the virtuous circle where development of better content and services depends on infrastructure deployment and vice versa.
Poseg javne politike mora biti sorazmeren in ne sme izkrivljati konkurence niti ovirati zasebnih naložb, prav tako mora povečati spodbude za naložbe in znižati vstopne ovire.
Public intervention should be proportionate and should neither distort competition nor inhibit private investment and should increase incentives to invest and lower entry barriers.
V zvezi s tem lahko javne oblasti spodbujajo vzpostavitev visoko zmogljive infrastrukture, ki je usmerjena v prihodnost.
In this respect, public authorities may support the rollout of future-proof high-capacity infrastructure.
Treba je pripraviti nekatere smernice v zvezi z nacionalnimi ali lokalnimi javnimi oblastmi ne glede na to, ali imajo na trgu elektronskih komunikacij izključno podporno vlogo ali so pri tem precej dejavnejše.
Some guidelines are needed regarding national or local public authorities playing a role in the electronic communications market, may it be purely supportive or more engaged.
Uvodna izjava 3 h (novo)
Recital 3 h (new)
(3h) Regulativni okvir mora zajemati tudi dodatne cilje, ki so: spodbujanje varstva potrošnikov v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij z zagotavljanjem točnih in izčrpnih informacij, pri čemer se uporabijo vsa razpoložljiva sredstva, preglednosti in pogojev za pristojbine in dajatve ter visokih stan dardov pri izvajanju storitev; popolno priznavanje vloge združenj za varstvo potrošnikov pri javnih posvetovanjih; omogočanje pristojnim organom, da preprečujejo možne goljufije in učinkovito delujejo proti vsakršni prevari na področju elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
(3h) The regulatory framework should also encompass the additional aims of: promoting consumer protection in the electronic communications sector by providing for accurate and comprehensive information, employing every possible means to that end, for transparency in terms of fees and charges, and for high standards in the delivery of services; fully recognising the role of consumer associations in public consultations; ensuring that the competent authorities are provided with the powers to thwart possible rigging and act with the necessary effectiveness to stamp out any instances of fraud involving electronic communications services.
Namen je poudariti, da mora biti zaščita potrošnikov eden pomembnejših ciljev usklajenega regulativnega okvira.
The idea is to stress that the need to protect consumers should feature prominently among the aims of the harmonised regulatory framework.
Uvodna izjava 3 i (novo)
Recital 3 i (new)
(3i) Komisija mora pri sprejemanju ukrepov v okviru te direktive na podlagi učinkovitega posvetovanja upoštevati stališča nacionalnih regulativnih organov in zainteresiranih skupin v tej panogi, da bi zagotovila preglednost in sorazmernost.
(3i) The views of national regulatory authorities and industry stakeholders should be taken into account by the Commission when adopting measures under this Directive through the use of effective consultation to ensure transparency and proportionality.
Izdati mora tudi podrobne dokumente o posvetovanjih, v katerih bo razložila potek različnih možnih ukrepov, zainteresiranim skupinam pa da dovolj časa za odgovor.
The Commission should issue detailed consultation documents, explaining the different courses of action being considered, and interested stakeholders shall be given a reasonable time in which to respond.
Po posvetovanju in po pregledu odgovorov mora Komisija obrazložiti sprejeto odločitev v izjavi, ki mora vsebovati opis, kako je upoštevala stališča iz odgovorov zainteresiranih skupin.
Following the consultation, after having considered the responses, the Commission should give reasons for the resulting decision in a statement, which should include a description of how the views of those responding have been taken into account.
Pri sprejemanju odločitev na ravni Skupnosti je treba upoštevati mnenja nacionalnih regulativnih organo in interesnih skupin v tej panogi, saj morajo biti te odločitve pregledne in sorazmerne z želenim rezultatom.
It is essential that the views of NRAs and industry stakeholders are taken into account in decisions at Community level, which decisions must be transparent and proportionate to the result to be achieved.
Zato mora med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in interesnimi skupinami potekati celostna in učinkovita razprava.
For this to occur, full and effective consultation with national regulatory authorities and industry stakeholders is necessary.
Sklicevanje na Komisijo se lahko nadomesti s Skupino evropskih regulatorjev, glej obrazložitev predlogov sprememb k uvodni izjavi 3.
Reference to the Commission may be replaced with ERG, see justification for the amendments to Recital (3).
(4a) Brez poseganja v Direktivo 1999/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 1999 o radijski opremi in telekomunikacijski terminalski opremi ter medsebojnem priznavanju skladnosti te opreme je treba pojasniti nekatere vidike uporabe terminalske opreme glede dostopa za uporabnike invalide, da se zagotovi interoperabilnost med terminalsko opremo ter elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami.
(4a) Without prejudice to Directive 1999/5/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity, it is necessary to clarify the application of certain aspects of terminal equipments concerning access for disabled end-users to ensure interoperability between terminal equipments and electronic communications networks and services.
Če za invalidne osebe ne bo zagotovljenega dostopa do terminalske opreme, te osebe ne bodo imele dostopa niti do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev.
If the access to terminal equipments is not assured for people with disabilities, they will not be able to access electronic communications networks and services neither.
Zato je treba zaradi zagotavljanja interoperabilnosti med obema jasno opredeliti, kakšna vrsta terminalske opreme, ki omogoča dostop za uporabnike invalide, se zahteva.
That is why, in order to ensure interoperability between both, a clear mention of what kind of terminal equipments, which are those concerning access for disabled end-users is required.
(5a) Dejavnosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov in Komisije pri okviru za elektronske komunikacije prispevajo k izpolnitvi širših ciljev javne politike na področju kulture, zaposlovanja, varstva okolja, socialne kohezije, regionalnega razvoja ter prostorskega načrtovanja.
(5a) The activities of national regulatory authorities and of the Commission under the framework for electronic communications contribute to the fulfilment of broader public policy objectives in the areas of culture, employment, the environment, social cohesion, regional development and town and country planning.
Regulativni okvir mora upoštevati tudi, da je treba zmanjšati regionalne vrzeli v razvoju in zato spodbujati inovacije in naložbe v vseh regijah EU.
The regulatory framework should also take into account the need for closing regional gaps in development aiming to increase innovation and investment in all regions of the EU.
(11a) Nacionalni trgi elektronskih komunikacij se bodo v Evropski uniji še naprej razlikovali.
(11a) National electronic communications markets will continue to differ within the European Union.
Zato morajo nacionalni regulativni organi in Organ evropskih regulatorjev za telekomunikacije imeti pristojnosti in znanje, da bi na področju elektronskih komunikacijskih trgov in storitev ustvarili konkurenčen „ekosistem“ EU ob upoštevanju nacionalnih in regionalnih razlik ter zahteve po subsidiarnosti.
It is, therefore, essential that national regulatory authorities and the Body of European Regulators in Telecom ("BERT") possess the powers and knowledge in order to build a competitive EU "ecosystem" in electronic communications markets and services while understanding national and regional differences and respecting the requirements of subsidiarity;
(16) Radijske frekvence je treba obravnavati kot redek javni vir, ki ima veliko javno in tržno vrednost.
(16) Radio frequencies should be considered a scarce public resource that has an important public and market value.
V javnem interesu je, da se spekter upravlja kar najbolj učinkovito z gospodarskega, družbenega in okoljskega vidika in da se postopno odpravijo ovire za njegovo učinkovito uporabo.
It is in the public interest that spectrum is managed as efficiently and effectively as possible from an economic, social and environmental perspective and that obstacles to its efficient use are gradually withdrawn.
V javnem interesu je, da se spekter upravlja kar najbolj učinkovito z gospodarskega, družbenega in okoljskega vidika ter da upošteva cilje kulturne raznolikosti in medijskega pluralizma in da se postopno odpravijo ovire za njegovo učinkovito uporabo.
It is in the public interest that spectrum is managed as efficiently and effectively as possible from an economic, social and environmental perspective and taking account of the objectives of cultural diversity and of media pluralism, and that obstacles to its efficient use are gradually withdrawn.
Zagotoviti je treba, da se bo pri upravljanju spektra še naprej upošteval vidik kulturnega in medijskega pluralizma.
It needs to be ensured that spectrum management will continue to take cultural and media pluralism aspects into account.
(16a) Čeprav upravljanje spektra ostaja v pristojnosti držav članic, lahko le koordinacija in, kjer je potrebno, usklajevanje na ravni Skupnosti zagotovita, da uporabniki spektra v celoti izkoristijo notranji trg in so interesi EU učinkovito ubranjeni v svetu.
(16a) Although spectrum management remains within the competence of the Member States , only coordination and, where appropriate , harmonisation at Community level can ensure that spectrum users derive the full benefits of the internal market and that EU interests can be effectively defended world-wide.
Upravljanje spektra mora biti usklajeno s širšo mednarodno agendo usklajevanja, za katero si prizadevata Mednarodna telekomunikacijska zveza in Evropska konferenca poštnih in telekomunikacijskih uprav, če želimo, da bi bilo učinkovito.
Spectrum management to be effective needs to be aligned with the broader international harmonisation agenda pursued by ITU and CEPT.
(16b) Določbe te direktive o upravljanju spektra morajo biti skladne z delom mednarodnih in regionalnih organizacij, ki se ukvarjajo z upravljanjem radijskega spektra, na primer Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze (ITU) in Evropske konference poštnih in telekomunikacijskih uprav (CEPT), da bi se zagotovilo učinkovito upravljanje in usklajevanje uporabe spektra v Skupnosti.
(16b) The spectrum management provisions of this Directive should be consistent with the work of international and regional organisations dealing with radio spectrum management, such as the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT), so as to ensure the efficient management of and harmonisation of the use of spectrum across the Community and globally.
(16c) Da bi prispevali k izpolnitvi ciljev iz člena 8a Direktive 2002/21/ES (Okvirna direktiva), je treba za leto 2010 sklicati srečanje na vrhu,namenjeno razpravi o spektru,ki bi ga vodile države članice in na katerem bi sodelovali Evropski parlament, Komisija in zainteresirane strani.
(16c) In order to contribute to the fulfilment of the objectives laid down in Article 8a of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive), a spectrum-summit should be convened in 2010, driven by Member States, including the European Parliament, the Commission and all stakeholders.
Srečanje na vrhu mora prispevati zlasti k:
The summit should in particular contribute to :
a) zagotavljanju večje doslednosti pri politikah spektra EU na splošno;
a) ensuring greater consistency in EU spectrum policies in general;
b) sprostitvi spektra za nove elektronske komunikacijske storitve po digitalnemu prehodu;
b) freeing spectrum for new electronic communications services once the digital switchover takes place;
c) zagotavljanju usmerjanja v zvezi s prehodom z analogne na digitalno prizemno televizijo.
c) providing guidance regarding the switchover from analogue to digital terrestrial television.
Ker se zdi, da je težko doseči sporazum med vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, bi bilo srečanje na vrhu leta 2010 lahko najboljša priložnost za oblikovanje konsenza.
Since it looks difficult to find common understanding between all interested parties, a summit in 2010 might be the ideal time to build consensus;
(16d) Prehod z analogne na digitalno prizemno televizijo mora zaradi večje učinkovitosti prenosa digitalne tehnologije sprostiti precejšen del spektra v Evropski uniji, t.i. „digitalno dividendo“.
(16d) The switchover from analogue to digital terrestrial television should, as a result of the superior transmission efficiency of digital technology, free up a significant amount of spectrum in the European Union, the so-called "digital dividend".
Države članice morajo čim prej sprostiti digitalno dividendo, da bodo državljani lahko uživali koristi uporabe novih, inovativnih in konkurenčnih storitev.
Member States should release their digital dividends as quickly as possible, allowing citizens to benefit from the deployment of new, innovative and competitive services.
Zato je treba odpraviti ovire na nacionalni ravni za učinkovito (ponovno) dodelitev digitalne dividende ter sprejeti skladnejši in celostnejši pristop za njeno dodeljevanje v Skupnosti.
To this end the obstacles existing at national level for the efficient (re)allocation of the digital dividend should be removed and a more coherent and integrated approach to the allocation of the digital dividend in the Community should be pursued.
(17) Radijske frekvence je treba upravljati, da se prepreči škodljivo motenje.
(17) Radio frequencies should be managed so as to ensure that harmful interference is avoided.
Ta osnovni pojem škodljivih motenj je zato treba pravilno opredeliti, da se zagotovi omejitev regulativnega posega na raven, ki je potrebna za preprečevanje takšnih motenj.
The basic concept of harmful interference should therefore be properly defined to ensure that regulatory intervention is limited to the extent necessary to prevent such interference.
Ta osnovni pojem škodljivih motenj je zato treba pravilno opredeliti ob upoštevanju veljavnih mednarodno sprejetih frekvenčnih načrtov , da se zagotovi omejitev regulativnega posega na raven, ki je potrebna za preprečevanje takšnih motenj.
The basic concept of harmful interference should therefore be properly defined by reference to existing internationally agreed frequency plans to ensure that regulatory intervention is limited to the extent necessary to prevent such interference.
Nacionalni in mednarodni frekvenčni načrti obstajajo predvsem zaradi težav z motnjami.
Interference problems are one of the main reasons for the existence of national and international frequency plans.
Ker frekvence segajo onstran meja EU, je treba spoštovati mednarodno zavezujoče sporazume, da bi se preprečile motnje.
As frequencies cross borders beyond the EU, internationally binding agreements to avoid interference must be respected.
(20) Z odobritvami tehnološke nevtralnosti in nevtralnosti storitev je treba povečati prožnost upravljanja spektra in dostopa do spektra, da bodo lahko uporabniki spektra izbrali najboljše tehnologije in storitve, ki jih bodo uporabljali v frekvenčnem pasu (v nadaljnjem besedilu načelo tehnološke nevtralnosti in nevtralnosti storitev).
(20) Flexibility in spectrum management and access to spectrum should be increased through technology- and service-neutral authorisations to let spectrum users choose the best technologies and services to apply in a frequency band (hereinafter referred to as the ‘principles of technology and service neutrality’).
Upravna določitev tehnologij in storitev mora postati izjema in mora biti jasno utemeljena ter predmet rednega pregleda .
The administrative determination of technologies and services should become the exception and should be clearly justified and subject to regular periodic review .
(20) Z odobritvami tehnološke nevtralnosti in nevtralnosti storitev je treba povečati prožnost upravljanja spektra in dostopa do spektra, da bodo lahko uporabniki spektra izbrali najboljše tehnologije in storitve, ki jih bodo uporabljali v frekvenčnih pasovih, ki so na voljo za storitve elektronske komunikacije, kot so opredeljene v nacionalnih tabelah za dodelitev frekvenc in v pravilniku o radiokomunikacijah Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze (v nadaljnjem besedilu načelo tehnološke nevtralnosti in nevtralnosti storitev).
(20) Flexibility in spectrum management and access to spectrum should be increased through technology- and service-neutral authorisations to let spectrum users choose the best technologies and services to apply in frequency band s available to electronic communications services as identified in national frequency allocation tables and in the ITU Radio Regulations (hereinafter referred to as the ‘principles of technology and service neutrality’).
Upravna določitev tehnologij in storitev bi se morala uporabljati, kadar so ogroženi cilji splošnega interesa .
The administrative determination of technologies and services should apply when general interest objectives are at stake .
S predlogom spremembe se zagotovi pravna usklajenost z opredelitvijo nevtralnosti storitev iz prvega pododstavka četrtega odstavka devetega člena okvirne direktive.
Necessary to ensure legal consistency with the definition of service neutrality proposed under Article 9 paragraph 4 subparagraph 1 of the Framework Directive .
(21) Izjeme od načela tehnološke nevtralnosti morajo biti omejene in utemeljene s potrebo po preprečevanju škodljivih motenj, na primer z uvedbo emisijskih mask in ravni moči, ali s potrebo po zagotovitvi javnega zdravja z omejitvijo izpostavljanja najširše javnosti elektromagnetnim poljem ali po zagotovitvi pravilne souporabe spektra, zlasti tam, kjer je njegova uporaba dovoljena samo s splošnimi odobritvami, ali tam, kjer je nujno potrebna za uskladitev z izjemo od načela nevtralnosti storitev .
(21) Exceptions to the principle of technology neutrality should be limited and justified by the need to avoid harmful interference, for example by imposing emission masks and power levels, or to ensure the protection of public health by limiting public exposure to electromagnetic fields, or to ensure proper sharing of spectrum, in particular where its use is only subject to general authorisations, or where strictly necessary to comply with an exception to the principle of service neutrality .