natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To skupaj z določbami o okrepljenem in strukturnem sodelovanju kaže na to, da je pristop k Uniji in razvoju njenih politik dejanje svobodne izbire, ki temelji na resnični politični zavezanosti.
When taken together with the provisions on enhanced and structured cooperation, this clearly demonstrates that involvement in the Union and in the furtherance of its policies is something that must be chosen freely on the basis of a genuine political commitment.
Začetek veljavnosti nove pogodbe
Entry into force of the new Treaty
Nova pogodba nadaljuje tradicijo pogodb, ki spreminjajo veljavne pogodbe, pri čemer bodo te še naprej obstajale kot spremenjene, in ker jih ne namerava nadomestiti ali razveljaviti v celoti, so pravila glede začetka veljavnosti te pogodbe običajna pravila za začetek veljavnosti novih pogodb.
Since the new Treaty continues the tradition of treaties amending treaties already in force, and which will continue to exist in amended form, and since it does not seek to repeal and replace the current Treaties in their entirety, the rules governing its entry into force are those customarily applied in such cases.
Tako lizbonska pogodba sama določa (člen 6(2)) svoj začetek veljavnosti 1. januarja 2009, če bodo deponirane vse listine o ratifikaciji, ali prvi dan meseca, ki sledi deponiranju zadnje listine o ratifikaciji.
Accordingly, the Treaty of Lisbon itself provides (Article 6(2)) for its entry into force on 1 January 2009, if all the ratification instruments have been deposited by that date, or, failing that, on the first day of the month following the deposit of the final ratification instrument.
Protokol (št. 10) o prehodnih določbah določa morebitne nujne prilagoditve v prehodnem obdobju.
The protocol (No 10) concerning the transitional provisions provides for any adjustments which may be required during the transitional period.
Skupna ocena
Overall assessment/recommendation to approve the new Treaty
Glede na zgornjo analizo, je skupna ocena Odbora za ustavne zadeve, ki temelji na rezultatih medvladne konference, zaključene oktobra 2007, in na lizbonski pogodbi odločno pozitivna.
In the light of the preceding analysis, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs' overall assessment of the outcome of the IGC which completed its work in October 2007 and the Treaty of Lisbon can only be resolutely positive.
Tako je bilo namreč omogočeno Evropi, da se premakne iz zaskrbljujočega zastoja, v katerem se je znašla.
First and foremost, it enabled Europe to overcome the extremely worrying impasse in which it found itself.
Sprejetje pogodbe bo odprlo možnost za ponovni začetek postopka ratifikacije v Franciji in na Nizozemskem in bo olajšajo uporabo parlamentarne metode z namenom, da novo besedilo prične veljati.
Its adoption will clear the way for a resumption of the ratification process in France and the Netherlands and will facilitate the use of the parliamentary method with a view to bringing the new text into force.
Seveda gre za kompromis, ki za Parlament predstavlja huda popuščanja: opustili so se ideja o ustavi in nekateri elementi, ki so bili zapisani v ustavni pogodbi; predvidevajo se obžalovanja vreden odlog za začetek veljavnosti nekaterih elementov in posebni ukrepi, oblikovani za izpolnitev zahtev nekaterih držav članic.
Of course, the new Treaty is a compromise, one involving concessions which are difficult for Parliament to accept: the abandonment of the very idea of a Constitution and of certain provisions laid down in the Constitution; regrettable postponements of the entry into force of certain provisions and specific measures to satisfy the demands of a few Member States.
Vendar je to politična cena, ki jo je treba plačati za izhod iz krize, ki jo je v Uniji povzročila zavrnitev ustavne pogodbe na referendumih v Franciji in na Nizozemskem.
This was the political price to be paid to find a way out of the crisis into which the 'no' votes in the French and Dutch referendums had plunged Europe.
Zlati je treba poudariti, da nova pogodba prinaša več demokracije v Evropsko unijo, ji omogoča večjo učinkovitost pri sprejemanju odločitev, zagotavlja določeno jasnost in boljše razumevanje vlog posameznih organov znotraj Unije ter stopnjo odgovornosti Unije na eni strani in držav članic na drugi.
Above all, however, the new Treaty enhances democracy in the European Union, fosters more effective decision-making and clarifies to some extent who does what in the Union and the competences allocated to the Union, on the one hand, and to the Member States, on the other.
Dodatne pripombe soporočevalca Íñiga Méndeza de Viga
Additional remarks by Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, co-rapporteur
Ponovno so se pokazale omejitve medvladnega pristopa k spreminjanju pogodb.
The intergovernmental approach to Treaty revision has once again shown its limitations.
Storjen ni bil niti en sam bistven korak naprej v primerjavi z ustavno pogodbo, veliko pa je bilo izpuščenega.
Not a single substantive step forward has been made with respect to the Constitutional Treaty, while much has been removed.
Na kratko, načelo je bilo rezati raje kot ustvarjati.
In short, the instinct was to cut rather than to create.
Še več, z očitnim preziranjem doseženih sporazumov je nekaterim vladam uspelo, da so razdrle prejšnje dogovore in so si zagotovile posebne izjeme ali razlage, ki se ujemajo z njihovimi interesi.
What is more, with manifest disdain for the compromises reached, some governments have succeeded in unravelling earlier agreements and securing special exemptions or interpretations that fit in with their own interests.
Najboljši primer za to je sprejetje omejitev, ki jih je določila vlada Združenega kraljestva Tonyja Blaira.
The prime example of this is the acceptance of the 'red lines' set out by Tony Blair's UK Government.
Nikoli ni bilo bolj očitno pomanjkanje vizije in ambicij, ki so ga pokazali evropski nacionalni voditelji, lizbonska pogodba pa je jasen odraz občutka boječnosti - in celo naravnost nezaupanja - v zvezi z Unijo in njenimi institucijami.
The lack of vision and ambition shown by national leaders in the European arena has never been so obvious, and the Lisbon Treaty is a clear reflection of a feeling of diffidence towards – and even downright mistrust of – the Union and its institutions.
Zato tudi ni presenetljivo, da so številni Evropejci vidno presenečeni nad usodo ustavne pogodbe - presenečenje, ki je podobno tistemu, ki ga je čutil Altiero Spinelli, ko je primerjal Pogodbo o Evropski uniji, ki jo je sprejel Evropski parlament, z Enotnim aktom, ki ga je sprejel Svet.
It is therefore no surprise that many Europeans are visibly dismayed at the fate of the Constitutional Treaty – a dismay similar to that felt by Altiero Spinelli when he compared the Treaty on European Union adopted by the European Parliament with the Single Act adopted by the Council.
Treba pa je povedati, da so številne napredne ideje, ki jih je vseboval v osnutek, sedaj v veljavi.
It must be said, however, that many of the advances contained in that draft are today in force.
Nekaj podobnega se bo zgodilo, ko bo lizbonska pogodba začela veljati: napredek, ki ga je doprinesla ustavna pogodba, bo del primarnega prava Skupnosti.
Something similar will happen when the Lisbon Treaty enters into force: the advances brought by the Constitutional Treaty will form part of Community primary law.
Ko bo prišel ta trenutek, bomo morali koristno uporabiti institucionalne določbe pogodbe in njen potencial ter udejanjiti njene instrumente, da bo Unija postala še bolj sestavni del vsakdana evropskih državljanov.
When that moment comes, we will need to make good use of the Treaty's institutional provisions and its potential and to flesh out its instruments in order to make the Union a more integral part of the daily lives of European citizens.
Evropa se bo morala spopasti z vedno večjo strateško grožnjo, ki jo predstavljata terorizem in širjenje jedrskega orožja, ter z novimi svetovnimi razmerami, ki sta jih povzročili globalizacija in tehnološka revolucija.
Europe will need to face up to the growing strategic threats posed by terrorism and nuclear proliferation and to the new world situation created by globalisation and the technological revolution.
Glede na velikost izzivov, ki jo čakajo, Evropa ne more skriti svoje glave v pesek: če ne bo v celoti podprla gospodarsko rast, reformo trga in večjo konkurenčnost, se ne bo mogla uspešno zoperstaviti moči gospodarstva Združenih držav in novim vetrovom, ki pihajo iz držav, kot so Kitajska in Indija.
Given the scale of the challenges facing it, Europe cannot bury its head in the sand: unless it throws its weight behind economic growth, market reform and greater competitiveness, it will be unable successfully to face up to the might of the US economy and the new winds blowing from countries such as China and India.
Unija se mora strniti v bran načelom in vrednotam, ki združujejo evropejce in mora nastpiti kot zaščitnik socialnega modela, ki ima, kljub svojim napakam, neštete prednosti.
The Union must rally around the principles and values that unite Europeans and must stand as the guardian of a social model that, for all its imperfections, has countless advantages.
Evropa se bo morala soočiti tudi z vprašanjem sosedskih odnosov.
Europe will also need to address the issue of neighbourly relations.
Lizbonska pogodba daje potrebno pravno podlago na tem področju, ki je tesno povezano z vprašanjem meja Unije.
The Treaty of Lisbon provides us with the necessary legal basis in this area, which is closely linked with the issue of the Union's boundaries.
Čeprav je iz lizbonske pogodbe odstranjen, bi moral moto pogodbe o ustavi, "združeni v raznolikosti", služiti kot vodilo EU pri njenih prizadevanjih, da se ljudi pouči o naši zgodovinski dediščini in se jo zaščiti.
Although no longer to be found in the Lisbon Treaty, the Constitutional Treaty's motto 'Unity in Diversity' should serve to guide the EU in its efforts to educate people about and protect our historical heritage.
Evropa mora raziskati nove oblike upravljanja, ki bodo zagotavljale večjo vključitev javnosti v evropska vprašanja, vključno z več posvetovalne demokracije na lokalni ravni, e-demokracijo, sodelovanjem državljanov pri načrtovanju proračuna ter arbitražo za rešitev sporov.
Europe needs to explore new forms of governance that will ensure greater public engagement with European issues, including more deliberative democracy at local level, e-democracy, participatory budgeting and arbitration to settle disputes.
Nadalje mora biti gospodarsko upravljanje, zlasti odnosi med evro skupino in Evropsko centralno banko, središče poglobljene razprave z namenom, da se preneha z besednimi boji, ki so vse bolj pogosti.
Furthermore, economic governance, with particular reference to relations between the Eurogroup and the European Central Bank, needs to be the focus of an in-depth debate aimed at putting an end to the dialectical skirmishes that are becoming increasingly common.
Vsi se moramo zavedati dejstva, da bo težko, da bi vseh 27 držav napredovalo skupaj.
We must be aware of the fact that it will be difficult for all 27 Member States to move forward together.
Če naj Unija doseže svoje cilje, se Evropa ne more premikati s hitrostjo najpočasnejšega člena.
If the Union is to achieve its goals, the European convoy cannot sail at the speed of the slowest ship.
Zato bo v prihodnje treba večkrat uporabiti okrepljeno sodelovanje.
Greater use will therefore need to be made of enhanced cooperation in the future.
Evropa si ne sme - in ne more - dovoliti, da se vdaja introspekciji in lastnim krizam ter nato pričakovati, da se bo svet ustavil za čas, ki je potreben, da razreši svoje dvome in oklevanja.
Europe must not – and cannot – allow itself to indulge in introspection, to wallow in its own crises and expect the world simply to stop long enough for it to sort out its doubts and hesitancy.
Vendar zdaj se lahko Evropa pri ureditvi svojih zadev zanese na lizbonsko pogodbo in na napredek, ki ga prinaša.
However, in order to set its house in order, Europe can now rely on the Lisbon Treaty and the advances it brings.
Pogodba je edina pot, ki prinaša upanje za prihodnost, saj je evropsko povezovanje postopek, ki, kot je Paul Valéry rekel za poezije, ni nikoli končan, le opuščen.
The Treaty represents the one and only path of hope for the future, because European integration is a process that, as Paul Valéry said of poems, is 'never finished, only abandoned'.
In Parlament bo tisti, ki bo vodil po tej poti.
And it will be Parliament that leads the way along that path.
PRILOGA I: Pristojnosti Unije
ANNEX 1: The competences of the Union
Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije navaja tudi skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko ter usklajevanje ekonomske politike in politike zaposlovanja, ki ju zaradi njune specifične narave ne moremo uvrstiti pod nobeno od naštetih pristojnosti v tej preglednici.
The TFEU also refers to the common foreign and security policy and the coordination of economic and employment policies , which, because of their specific nature, do not come under any of the three categories in this table.
Našteta področja pristojnosti, ki so podčrtana, so področja, kjer zaenkrat ni posebnih predpisov v Pogodbah, vendar je na njih Unija že ukrepala, predvsem z rabo predpisov, povezanih z notranjim trgom ali z uporabo člena 308 Pogodbe o ES.
The areas of competence underlined in each of the columns are areas for which there are currently no specific provisions in the Treaties but in which the Union has already taken action, in particular using the provisions relating to the internal market or Article 308 TEC.
Vrsta pristojnosti
Type of competence
(Popoln seznam)
(full list)
Poleg naštetih pristojnosti ima Unija tudi izključno pristojnost za sklenitev mednarodnih sporazumov, kadar je sklenitev predvidena v zakonodajnem aktu Unije ali je potrebna, da se Uniji omogoči izvajanje njene notranje pristojnosti, ali kadar lahko sklenitev sporazuma vpliva na skupna pravila ali spremeni njihovo področje uporabe.
In addition to these competences, the Union also high as an exclusive competence for the conclusion of international agreements when this is provided for in a legislative act of the Union, when it is necessary to enable the Union to exercise its internal competence or when it is likely to affect common rules or adversely affect their scope.
(Nepopoln seznam)
(non-exhaustive list)
Čeprav Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije obravnava in izvaja področja, ki so zapisana s poševno pisavo v členu 4, v zvezi z deljeno pristojnostjo, izvajanje teh pristojnosti ne ovira držav članic pri izvajanju njihovih pristojnosti.
Although the TFEU deals with the policies indicated in italics in this column in the article relating to shared competences, they are sectors in which Union action does not have the effect of preventing the exercise of national competences.
Le Unija lahko sprejema pravno zavezujoče akte; države članice lahko ukrepajo le, če jih Unija za to pooblasti ali za izvajanje aktov Unije.
Only the Union can adopt legally binding acts; the Member States cannot intervene unless authorised to do so by the Union, or to implement measures taken by the latter.
Unija in države članice lahko sprejemajo pravno zavezujoče akte; države članice izvajajo svojo pristojnost, kadar Unija svoje pristojnosti ne izvaja.
The Union and the Member States can adopt legally binding acts, the Member States being able to do so insofar as the Union has not done so.
Unija je pristojna le za podporo ukrepov držav članic (zlasti prek finančnih prispevkov); lahko izdaja predpise, a ne more usklajevati nacionalne zakonodaje in pravil.
The Union can intervene only to support action by Member States (primarily through financial contributions); it may legislate but not harmonise national legislation and regulations.
Carinska unija
Customs Union
Določitev pravil o konkurenci, potrebnih za delovanje notranjega trga
Establishing competition rules required for operation of the internal market
Denarna politika držav članic, katerih valuta je euro
Monetary policy for Member States whose currency is the euro
Ohranjanje morskih bioloških virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike
Conservation of the biological resources of the sea under the fisheries policy
Skupna trgovinska politika
Common commercial policy
Gospodarska, socialna in teritorialna kohezija
Economic, social and territorial cohesion
Kmetijstvo in ribištvo (razen ohranjanja morskih bioloških virov)
Agriculture and fisheries (excluding conservation of the biological resources of the sea)
Vseevropska omrežja
TransEuropean networks
Skupna skrb za varnost na področju javnega zdravja
Common safety concerns in the public health sphere
Raziskovanje in tehnološki razvoj
Research and technological development
Politika o vesolju
Space policy
Razvojno sodelovanje
Development cooperation
Varovanje in izboljšanje človekovega zdravja
Protection and improvement of human health
I - Obstoječe pravne podlage, na katerih se bo glasovalo s kvalificirano večino
I - Existing legal bases which move to qualified majority voting
[na prvem mestu so navedene številke členov Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki so ostale v lizbonski pogodbi; med [...] so številke, ki jih bodo členi dobili v konsolidirani različici Pogodb (v skladu s preglednico, priloženo lizbonski pogodbi); veljavni postopek je prikazan v oklepaju s poševno pisavo]
[the numbers of the articles in the TEU and TFEU indicated first refer to those given in the Treaty of Lisbon; the numbers in [...] are those the articles will have in a future consolidated version of the Treaties (in accordance with the table annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon); the current procedure is indicated in brackets in italics]
Člen 9(3) [16] Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in člen 201(b) [236] (b) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: Zaporedje predsedovanja Svetu – sklep Evropskega sveta brez predloga Komisije (člen 203 Pogodbe o ES – Svet odloča soglasno)
Art. 9 [16], paragraph 3, TEU and Art. 201b [236], paragraph (b), TFEU: Order of Presidencies of the Council – decision of European Council, without a Commission proposal (Art. 203 TEC – Council decides unanimously)
Člen 42 [48] Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: prosto gibanje delavcev, socialni prejemki – redni zakonodajni postopek
Art. 42 [48] TFEU: free movement of workers, social benefits – ordinary legislative procedure
Ta postopek predvideva mehanizem „zasilne zavore“: ko država članica meni, da bi takšni ukrepi lahko prizadeli „temeljne vidike njenega sistema socialnega varstva, predvsem uporabo, njegove stroške ali finančno strukturo, ali bi ogrozili njegovo finančno ravnovesje“, lahko zahteva, da se zadeva predloži Evropskemu svetu (zaradi česar se odloži zakonodajni postopek).
This procedure has an 'emergency brake' mechanism: where a Member State considers that the measures concerned 'would affect fundamental aspects of its social security system, including its scope, cost or financial structure, or would affect the financial balance of that system', it may request that the matter be referred to the European Council (thus automatically suspending the legislative procedure).
Člen 47[53] (1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: svoboda ustanavljanja, začetek in opravljanje dejavnosti samozaposlenih oseb – redni zakonodajni postopek, kadar izvajanje ustreznih ukrepov vključuje spremembo v zakonodajnih načelih države članice (člen 47(2) Pogodbe o ES – soodločanje – soglasna odločitev Sveta)
Art. 47 [53], paragraph 1, TFEU: freedom of establishment, taking-up and pursuit of activities as self-employed persons – ordinary legislative procedure when the implementation of the relevant directives involves a change in the legislative principles in a Member State (Art. 47, paragraph 2, TEC: codecision – Council acts unanimously)
Člen 61 G [74] Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: upravno sodelovanje na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice – uredba Sveta, posvetovanje z EP (člen 66 Pogodbe o ES in člen 34(1) PEU: postopek je določen v členu 67(1) in (2) Pogodbe o ES: soglasje v Svetu po posvetovanju z EP – Svet lahko soglasno odloči, po posvetovanju z EP, da preide na glasovanje s kvalificirano večino)
Art. 61 G [74] TFEU: administrative cooperation in the area of freedom, security and justice – Council regulation, consultation of EP (Art. 66 TEC and Art. 34, paragraph 1, TEU: procedure laid down in Art. 67, paragraphs 1 and 2, TEC: unanimity in Council after consulting EP – Council may decide unanimously, after consulting EP, to move to qualified majority voting)
Člen 62 [77](2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: mejna kontrola – redni zakonodajni postopek (člen 62 Pogodbe o ES: postopek je določen v členu 67 Pogodbe o ES: soglasje v Svetu po posvetovanju z EP; Svet lahko soglasno odloči, po posvetovanju z EP, da preide na glasovanje s kvalificirano večino)
Art. 62 [77], paragraph 2, TFEU: border checks – ordinary legislative procedure (Art. 62 TEC: procedure laid down in Art. 67 TEC: unanimity in Council after consulting EP – Council may decide unanimously, after consulting EP, to move to qualified majority voting)
Člen 63 [78] Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: azil in zaščita beguncev ter razseljenih oseb – redni zakonodajni postopek (člen 63(1) in (2) Pogodbe o ES: postopek je določen v členu 67(5) Pogodbe o ES: soglasje in po posvetovanju z EP v nekaterih vidikih; Svet lahko soglasno odloči, po posvetovanju z EP, da preide na glasovanje s kvalificirano večino)
Art. 63 [78] TFEU: asylum and protection of refugees and displaced persons – ordinary legislative procedure (Art. 63, paragraphs 1 and 2, TEC: procedure laid down in Art. 67, paragraph 5, TEC: unanimity and consultation of EP on certain aspects – Council may decide unanimously, after consulting EP, to move to qualified majority voting)
Člen 63 a [79] Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: priseljevanje – redni zakonodajni postopek (člen 63(3) in (4) Pogodbe o ES: postopek je določen v členu 67 Pogodbe o ES: soglasje v Svetu po posvetovanju z EP; Svet lahko soglasno odloči, po posvetovanju z EP, da preide na glasovanje s kvalificirano večino)
Art. 63a [79] TFEU: immigration – ordinary legislative procedure (Art. 63, paragraphs 3 and 4, TEC: procedure laid down in Art. 67 TEC: unanimity in Council after consulting EP – Council may decide unanimously, after consulting EP, to move to qualified majority voting)
Člen 65 [81](2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: Pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah (razen družinskega prava)
Art. 65 [81], paragraph 2, TFEU: judicial cooperation in civil matters (excluding family law)
Točke e), g) in h) drugega odstavka vsebujejo novo pravno podlago; druge točke so že pokrite s členom 65 Pogodbe o ES.
Points (e), (g) and (h) of paragraph 2 of that article contain new legal bases; the other points were already covered by Article 65 TEC.
Člen 69 A [82](1) in (2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah – redni zakonodajni postopek
Art. 69 A [82], paragraphs 1 and 2, TFEU: judicial cooperation in criminal matters – ordinary legislative procedure
Za nadaljevanje postopka lahko Evropski svet v roku štirih mesecev zadevo predloži Svetu ali zahteva, da Komisija ali skupina držav, ki so oblikovale pobudo, predstavi nov zakonodajni predlog.
The European Council must, within four months, either refer the matter back to the Council so that the procedure continues, or request the Commission or the group of Member States from which the initiative originates to submit a new proposal.
Prav tam. člen 31(1)(e) PEU – soglasje v Svetu in posvetovanje EP)
(Art. 31, paragraph 1, point (e), TEU – unanimity in Council and simple consultation of EP)
Člen 69 D [85] Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: Eurojust – redni zakonodajni postopek ( člen 31(2) PEU – soglasje v Svetu in posvetovanje z EP)
Art. 69 D [85] TFEU: Eurojust – ordinary legislative procedure (Art. 31, paragraph 2, TEU – unanimity in Council and simple consultation of EP)
Člen 69 F [87](2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije: neoperativno policijsko sodelovanje – redni zakonodajni postopek (člen 30(1) PEU – soglasje v Svetu in posvetovanje z EP)
Art. 69 F [87], paragraph 2, TFEU: non-operational police cooperation – ordinary legislative procedure (Art. 30, paragraph 1, TEU – unanimity in Council and simple consultation of EP)