natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pokazalo se je tudi, da nekatere države članice nimajo zadostnih in ustreznih predelovalnih zmogljivosti, v nekaterih primerih pa kolektivni sistemi zbiranja odpadkov ovirajo konkurenco.
It has also become clear that certain Member States do not have enough appropriate recycling facilities and, in some cases, collective schemes for waste collection get in the way of free competition.
Prikazani stroški
Costs shown to the consumer
Pavšalni stroški ne odražajo niti dejanskih stroškov na koncu uporabnega cikla proizvoda niti njegovega okoljskega vpliva.
Flat rates reflect neither the actual costs of a product at the end of its service life nor its environmental impact.
Pri teh stroških tudi niso upoštevane naprave, ki imajo na koncu uporabnega cikla pozitivno vrednost.
Nor do the costs as shown take account of appliances that have a positive value at the end of their service life.
Pravni instrument se je tukaj pokazal za neučinkovitega v tem smislu, da bi potrošnike informiral o možnostih za recikliranje proizvodov.
The existing provisions have thus proved ineffective in informing consumers about products’ recycling potential.
Namen predlaganih sprememb je, da bi povečali stopnjo ločenega zbiranja, zmanjšali izgubljanje odpadne opreme v „sistemu“ za OEEO, pa tudi preprečili nezakonite pošiljke ter zagotovili ustrezno in visokokakovostno obdelavo OEEO.
The proposed amendments are designed to increase the rate of separated collection, to reduce loss of waste equipment within the ‘WEEE system’, while preventing illegal shipment, and also to ensure that WEEE receives appropriate, high-quality treatment.
Obenem je treba zmanjšati dosedanjo birokracijo na nacionalni ravni in s tem odpraviti ovire za notranji trg.
In addition, red-tape at national level should be reduced, thus removing impediments to the internal market.
predsednik Odbora za okolje,
Chair of the Committee on Environment,
Zadeva : Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi (prenovitev)
Subject : Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste electrical and electronic equipment (recast)
Razloga morata biti navedena v pisni obrazložitvi predlogov sprememb.“
Such reasons must be stated in a written justification to the amendments".
Poleg tega je Odbor za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 80a(2) in členom 80(3) ugotovil, da so tehnične prilagoditve, ki jih je v svojem mnenju predlagala zgoraj omenjena delovna skupina, potrebne za zagotovitev skladnosti predloga s pravili prenovitve.
Furthermore, pursuant to Rules 80a(2) and 80(3), the Committee on Legal Affairs considered that the technical adaptations suggested in the opinion of the abovementioned Working Party were necessary in order to ensure that the proposal complied with the recasting rules.
Potem ko je Odbor za pravne zadeve 31. marca 2009 na seji proučil zadevo in o njej glasoval s 17 glasovi za in brez vzdržanih glasov
In conclusion, after discussing it at its meeting of 31 March 2009, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 17 votes in favour and no abstentions
Prisotni so bili naslednji poslanci: Giuseppe Gargani (predsednik), Carlo Casini, Bert Doorn, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hartmut Nassauer, Eva-Riitta Siitonen, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Neena Gill, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Monica Frassoni, Jacques Toubon, Véronique Mathieu. , vašemu odboru kot pristojnemu odboru priporoča, naj predlog prouči ob upoštevanju njegovih predlogov in v skladu s členom 80a.
The following Members were present: Giuseppe Gargani (Chairman), Carlo Casini, Bert Doorn, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hartmut Nassauer, Eva-Riitta Siitonen, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Neena Gill, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Monica Frassoni, Jacques Toubon, Véronique Mathieu. , recommends that your Committee, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in keeping with its suggestions and in accordance with Rule 80a.
Priloženo je mnenje posvetovalne delovne skupine.
Encl.: Opinion of the Consultative Working Party.
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste electrical and electronic equipment
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, zlasti s točko 9, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 16. in 17. decembra 2008, da bi med drugim proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 16 and 17 December 2008 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna različica obravnavanega besedila. preučila predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenovitvi Direktive 2002/96/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. januarja 2003 o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi, in v medsebojnem soglasju prišla do naslednjih sklepov:
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
2) Naslednji deli besedila prenovljenega predloga bi morali biti osenčeni s sivo barvo, ki se ponavadi uporablja za označitev bistvenih sprememb:
2) The following parts of the text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes:
– v uvodni izjavi 13 predlagane nadomestitve izraza „ the precondition “ z izrazom „ a precondition “ (Ne zadeva slovenske različice, op. prev.);
- in recital 13, the proposed replacement of the words " the precondition " with the words " a precondition ";
– v členu 3(j)(ii) izraz „ ime “;
- in Article 3( j )(ii), the word " name ";
– v členu 4 izraz „ ponovna uporaba “ (v prenovljeni različici je med puščicama, ki označujeta spremembo);
- in Article 4, the word " re-use " (having been presented in the recast text between adaptation arrows);
– cela prva in druga poved člena 5(4) Direktive 2002/96/ES, ki sta dvojno prečrtani in sta v predlogu za prenovitev med členoma 5 in 6;
- the entire wordings of the first and second sentence of Article 5(4) of Directive 2002/96/EC, having been identified with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of Articles 5 and 6 in the recast proposal;
– v členu 8(3) beseda „zbiranje“ ;
- in Article 8(3), the word " collection ";
– cela druga poved člena 12(1): „ Države članice, kadar je to primerno, spodbujajo proizvajalce k financiranju vseh stroškov, nastalih zaradi zbiranja OEEO iz zasebnih gospodinjstev “;
- the entire wording of the second sentence of Article 12(1), which reads " Member States, where appropriate, shall encourage producers to finance all the cost occurring for collection facilities for WEEE from private households ";
– v členu 15(2) predlagana nadomestitev povedi „ Komisija v ta namen spodbudi pripravo evropskih standardov .“ s povedjo „ Evropski standard EN 50419 se uporablja v ta namen. “;
- in Article 15(2), the proposed replacement of the sentence " The Commission shall promote the preparation of European standards for this purpose " with the sentence " The European Standard EN 50419 shall be applied for this purpose ";
– v členu 16(5) izraz „ ločeno “ (v prenovljeni različici je med puščicama, ki označujeta spremembo);
- in Article 16(5), the word " separately " (having been presented in the recast text between adaptation arrows).
3) Naslednji deli prenovljenega besedila ustrezajo delom veljavnega besedila Direktive 2002/95/ES, v zvezi s katerimi očitno ni predlagana nobena sprememba in zatorej ne bi smeli biti osenčeni s sivo barvo:
3) The following parts of the recast text correspond to parts of the currently applicable text of Directive 2002/95/EC in respect of which no change is apparently being proposed, and which therefore should have not been marked with grey-shaded type:
– v uvodni izjavi 19 predlagani izbris besede „ torej “;
- in recital 19, the proposed deletion of the word " therefore ";
– v členu 2(2) beseda „zahteve“ ;
- in Article 2(2), the words " requirements of ";
– v členu 3(k) besede „fizično ali pravno“ ;
- in Article 3(k), the words " natural or legal ";
– v členu 5 izraz „ v obliki“ .
- in Article 5, the expression " in the form of ".
4) V prilogi II, točka 1 bi bilo treba sklic na „ člen 4 Direktive Sveta 75/442/EGS “ v zadnji povedi prilagoditi v sklic na „ člen 4 Direktive 2006/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta “.
4) In Annex II, point 1, the reference to " Article 4 of Council Directive 75/442/EEC " contained in the final sentence should be adapted so as to read as a reference to " Article 4 of Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ".
Jurisconsult Jurisconsult generalni direktor
Jurisconsult Jurisconsult Director General
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Anne Delvaux, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Julie Girling, Nick Griffin, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Gilles Pargneaux, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Oreste Rossi, Richard Seeber, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Bogusław Sonik, Catherine Soullie, Salvatore Tatarella, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Anne Delvaux, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Julie Girling, Nick Griffin, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Gilles Pargneaux, Antonyia Parvanova, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Oreste Rossi, Richard Seeber, Theodoros Skylakakis, Bogusław Sonik, Catherine Soullie, Salvatore Tatarella, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
o stališču Sveta v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zaščiti živali, ki se uporabljajo v znanstvene namene
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta v prvi obravnavi (06106/2010 – C7–0147/2010 ),
– having regard to the Council position at first reading (06106/2010 – C7‑0147/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0543 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0543 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 95(1) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0391/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0391/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom „Posledice začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja“ ( KOM(2009)0665 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication to Parliament and the Council entitled 'Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures' ( COM(2009)0665 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 294(7) in 114(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(7) and Article 114(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
UL C 277, 17.
OJ C 277, 17.
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7–0230/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7‑0230/2010 ),
Datum razglasitve prejetja stališča Sveta iz prve obravnave na zasedanju
Receipt of Council position at first reading announced in plenary
Luís Paulo Alves, Marian Harkin, Giovanni La Via, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov)
Luís Paulo Alves, Marian Harkin, Giovanni La Via, Dimitar Stoyanov
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o podpisu sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation
MANJŠINSKO MNENJE..........................................................................................................8
MINORITY OPINION...............................................................................................................8
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (8793/2009),
– having regard to the draft agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (8793/2009),
– ob upoštevanju člena 63(1)(3)(b) in prve povedi člena 300(2)(1) ter člena 300(3)(1) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7–264/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 63, first paragraph, point 3, point (b) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence and Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0264/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 79(3) in 218(6)(2)(a)(v) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 79(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), point (v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0231/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7‑0231/2010 ),
Svet je 18. septembra 2000 Komisijo pooblastil za pogajanja o sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Pakistanom o ponovnem sprejemu.
On 18 September 2000 the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a readmission agreement between the European Community and Pakistan.
Po številnih krogih pogajanj so sporazum 9. septembra 2008 parafirali na ravni pogajalcev.
Following several rounds of negotiations the agreement was initialled at the negotiators' level on 9 September 2008.
Svet je sprejel sklep o podpisu 4. junija 2009, sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Pakistanom pa je bil podpisan 26. oktobra 2009 v Bruslju.
The Council adopted the decision to sign the agreement on 4 June 2009 and the agreement was signed by the European Community and Pakistan in Brussels on 26 October 2009.
Evropska unija je zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2009 nadomestila in nasledila Evropsko skupnost.
As consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community.
Postopke, ki ji mora upoštevati Unija za sklenitev sporazuma, ureja člen 218(6)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki določa, da sklep o sklenitvi sporazuma sprejme Svet.
The procedures to be followed by the Union in order to conclude the Agreement are governed by Article 218(6) (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) which states that the Council shall adopt a decision concluding the agreement.
Z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe mora Evropski parlament odobriti sklenitev predlaganega sporazuma.
With the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament has to give its consent to the proposed agreement.
Pristojni odbor je Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, mnenje pa poda Odbor za zunanje zadeve.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) is the lead committee and the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) gives an opinion.
Namen sporazuma je okrepiti sodelovanje med upravami držav prosilk in zaprošene države, da bi pospešili postopek ponovnega sprejema.
The aim of the Agreement is to enhance the cooperation between the administrations of the requesting and requested States in order to render the readmission process swifter.
Zato sporazum na popolnoma vzajemni podlagi določa obveznost ponovnega sprejema lastnih državljanov, pod določenimi pogoji pa tudi državljanov tretjih držav in oseb brez državljanstva, ter potrebne tehnične določbe o postopku ponovnega sprejema (prošnja za ponovni sprejem, dokazna sredstva, roki, načini premestitve in vrste prevoza).
To that effect, the Agreement sets out the obligation, on a fully reciprocal basis, to readmit own nationals, and, under certain conditions, third country nationals and stateless persons as well as the necessary technical provisions regarding the readmission procedure (readmission application, means of evidence, time limits, transfer modalities and modes of transportation).
Cilj sporazuma je, da postane pomembno orodje v boju proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju v Evropsko unijo ter okrepi varnost na njenem ozemlju.
The Agreement aims to be an important instrument in the fight against illegal migration into the European Union and would enhance security in its territory.
Pakistan je pomembna država izvora in tranzita za migrante, ki ne izpolnjujejo ali ne izpolnjujejo več veljavnih pogojev za prisotnost na ozemlju države članice Evropske unije ali prebivanje v njej (podatki Komisije za EU-27 za leto 2008: 13348 prijetih oseb, 17016 odločitev o vrnitvi, 4424 odstranitev, od tega je bilo 3667 oseb vrnjenih v tretjo državo)..
Pakistan is an important country of origin or transit of migrants who do not, or who no longer fulfil the conditions in force for entry to, presence in, or residence on, the territory of an EU Member State (according to Commission data in 2008 EU-27: 13.348 apprehended, 17.016 return decisions, 4.424 removals, whereof 3.667 returned to a third country).
Sporazum s Pakistanom je pomemben tudi z regionalnega vidika, saj bo podprl prizadevanja Evropske unije, da okrepi sodelovanje z drugimi državami na območju.
The agreement with Pakistan is also relevant from a regional point of view and will support EU efforts to enhance cooperation with other countries in the region.
Sporazum vsebuje klavzulo o nevplivanju na druga pravila mednarodnega prava in varovanja podatkov.
The Agreement contains a clause of non-affection in respect of other international law and data protection rules.
Dejanska fizična vrnitev oseb je popolnoma v pristojnosti organov države članice in Pakistana.
The actual physical return of the person entirely rests in the competent authority in a Member State and Pakistan.
Ti morajo izpolnjevati ustrezne zahteve mednarodnega prava, kot so na primer načelo nevračanja, za izgone pa so odgovorne pred svojimi nacionalnimi sodišči.
They have to comply with relevant obligations arising from international law, such as the principle of non-refoulement and they will be held liable for expulsions before their national courts.
Načelo nevračanja ima tudi postopkovne posledice, saj morajo države pripraviti oceno tveganja, da bo prišlo do grdega ravnanja, in to tudi v primerih posrednih odstranitev v vmesno državo.
The principle of non-refoulement also has procedural implications, since States are required to conduct an assessment of the risk of ill-treatment, including in cases of indirect removal to an intermediary country.
Vse države članice so podpisnice Konvencije o statusu beguncev in Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in morajo zato te obveznosti izpolnjevati.
All Member States are parties to the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the European Convention of Human Rights and must therefore comply with these obligations.
S Sporazumom se ustanovi Skupni odbor za ponovni sprejem, ki lahko sprejme svoj poslovnik.
The Agreement establishes a Joint Readmission Committee which may adopt its rules of procedure.
Glede na to, da je Evropska komisija edina evropska institucija, ki sodeluje v tem skupnem odboru, bi jo Evropski parlament moral zaprositi, naj ga redno obvešča o dejavnostih odbora.
Having regard to the fact that in the Joint Readmission Committee out of the European institutions only the European Commission takes part, the European Parliament should request the Commission to provide regular information on the activity of the Committee.
Ozemeljska veljavnost
Territorial application
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, je Združeno kraljestvo podalo uradno obvestilo, da želi sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi tega sklepa.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the United Kingdom has notified its wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Decision.
Irska se je v skladu s tem Protokolom odločila, da ne bo sodelovala pri sprejetju tega sklepa.
Ireland, in accordance with the same Protocol, has decided not to participate in the adoption of this Decision.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Začetek veljavnosti, trajanje in prenehanje
Entry into force, duration and termination
Sporazum bo začel veljati prvi dan drugega meseca po datumu, ko se pogodbenici uradno obvestita, da so končani potrebni ratifikacijski postopki.
The Agreement will enter into force on the first day of the second month following the date on which the Parties notify each other that the procedures of ratification have been completed.
Člen 20(3) vsebuje klavzulo, ki določa, da se sporazum ne uporablja za nazaj, kar pomeni, da se ne bo uporabljal za pakistanske državljane, ki so na ozemlje držav članic prispeli pred začetkom veljavnosti pogodbe.
Article 20 (3) contains a clause which renders the agreement non-retroactive, which means that the agreement will not apply to those Pakistani nationals which have arrived in the territory of the Members States before the entry into force of the agreement.