natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· posebno poročilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu po osnutku priporočila Svetu Evropske unije glede pritožbe št. 1487/2005/GG z vprašanjem, kateri jeziki naj bi se uporabljali za spletne predstavitve predsedstva EU - odbor je sklenil o tem pripraviti poročilo (poročevalec Rainer Wieland);
· Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the Council of the European Union in complaint 1487/2005/GG the question as to the languages that should be used for the internet presentations of the Presidency of the EU - on which the Committee decided to draft a report (Rapporteur Rainer Wieland).
· posebno poročilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu po osnutku priporočila Evropski Komisiji glede pritožbe št. 289/2005/(WP)GG o tem, kako Komisija obravnava pritožbe o domnevnih kršitvah.
· Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the European Commission in complaint 289/2005/(WP)GG on the way in which the Commission is handling complaints alleging an infringement.
Odbor za peticije je 15. maja 2006 ob spremljanju posebnega poročila evropskega varuha človekovih pravic o pritožbi št. 2485/2004/GG glede priporočil evropskemu uradu za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) pripravil posebno sejo, na kateri sta sodelovala evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamanduros in Franz-Hermann Brüner.
On May 15 2006, in a follow up to the Special Report of the European Ombudsman on the Complaint 2485/2004/GG concerning recommendations to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the Committee on Petitions held an extraordinary meeting with the participation of Nikiforos Diamandouros, the European Ombudsman, and Franz-Hermann Brüner.
Odbor za peticije namerava zaprositi tudi konferenco predsednikov, naj pripravi poročilo o posebnem poročilu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
The Committee on Petitions intends to make a further request to the Conference of Presidents to prepare a report on the European Ombudsman's Special Report.
Sodelovanje s Svetom in državami članicami
Relations with Council and the Member States .
Peticije že po naravi osvetljujejo številne probleme v zvezi s prenosom ali izvajanjem evropske zakonodaje v državah članicah.
By their very nature the petitions process brings to light a number of problems with the transposition or implementation of the European legislation by the Member States.
Svet se na nenehne pozive, naj sodeluje pri dejavnostih odbora, ni odzval.
Repeated calls for the Council to get more involved into the work of the Committee remain unanswered.
Odnosi med odborom za peticije in državami članicami se nenehno razvijajo.
Relations between the Committee on Petitions and Member States have continued to develop.
Vendar bi si bilo treba za sodelovanje prizadevati na pozitiven način, da bi državljanom lahko ponudili najboljše rešitve problemov.
Nevertheless, more steps should be taken towards working together in a positive manner in order to provide citizens with the best solutions to their problems.
Države članice pri dejavnostih odbora sodelujejo v zvezi s posameznimi zadevami, vendar njihovi odnosi z odborom še veljajo za napete.
Member States have participated in the activity of the Committee on case by case basis, but relations between the two are still perceived as rather conflictual.
Ta pogled pojasni že narava peticij – to so pritožbe o tem, da nacionalni ali regionalni organi domnevno niso izvajali evropske zakonodaje.
The very nature of the petitions - complaints about alleged failures of national or regional bodies in applying European legislation - explains this situation.
Treba pa je poudariti, da poglavitni namen odbora za peticije ni kritizirati države članice, pač pa pomagati državljanom pri reševanju njihovih težav.
However, it is important to emphasize that the main goal of the Committee on Petitions is not to criticize Member States, but to assist citizens in solving their problems.
Če bomo uspeli doseči sodelovanje namesto oviranja, bo veliko zadev rešenih prej in v najboljšem interesu vseh strani.
Co-operation rather than hindrance should result in many cases being solved faster and in the best interest of all parties.
Odbor za peticije že od leta 2002 zahteva zanesljiv sistem za razdeljevanje dela in bazo podatkov, da bi lahko učinkovito deloval in obravnaval vse več zahtevkov – sistem, ki bi povečal preglednost dejavnosti odbora, kar je v javnem interesu.
Since 2002 the Committee on Petitions continuously required a trustworthy work-flow system and database in order to function effectively and manage the increasing demands made upon it; a system that enhances the transparency of the work of the Committee in the public interest.
Delovanje sedanjega sistema za e-peticije je bilo v prvi polovici leta 2006 deležno izboljšav, v drugo fazo postopka za e-peticije pa je bilo vloženih več mesecev podrobnega pripravljalnega dela.
The improvement in the functions of the current e-petition system continued during the first half of 2006, with detailed preparatory work being carried out for several months on the second phase of the e-Petitions process.
Pri tem je imela prednost vključitev funkcij programa Geda v sistem za e-peticije, da bi ga izboljšali in poenostavili.
Priority was given to incorporate the functions of Geda in e-Petition, to improve and simplify the system.
Poleti 2006 je direktorat za informacijsko tehnologijo iz dveh razlogov ustavil razvoj druge faze sistema za e-peticije.
During the summer of 2006, the Directorate of Information Technology (DIT) stopped the development of phase 2 of e-petition for two reasons.
Prvič, zaradi vrste tehničnih in licenčnih zapletov se je odločil opustiti programsko opremo Documentum.
Firstly, the DIT decided to abandon the use of Documentum software, following a series of technical and licensing difficulties.
Drugič, sredstva za razvoj računalniških aplikacij za to leto so bila že porabljena.
Secondly, the budget for IT applications development had been virtually exhausted for the year.
Nadomestilo za Documentum je bilo potrjeno konec leta 2006, tako da sta bila analiza in načrt za prenos e-peticij (in drugih aplikacij iz druge faze) mogoča komaj v začetku leta 2007.
The substitute for Documentum was validated by the end of 2006, so the analysis and the planning of the migration of e-petition (and the other 2 applications concerned) could only start at the beginning of 2007.
Učinek te odločitve na delo odbora je bil, da bodo dodatne funkcije, za katere smo zaprosili, razvite v procesu prenosa in bodo začele delovati šele konec leta 2007, torej dosti kasneje, kot je bilo načrtovano.
The impact of the DIT decision for Committee on Petitions was that the additional functions which we previously asked for would be developed as part of the migration process and would be launched at the end of 2007, much later than planned.
Obiski za ugotavljanje dejstev
Fact-finding visits
Odbor je uporabil možnost iz člena 192 in leta 2006 izvedel več obiskov za ugotavljanje dejstev, da bi na kraju samem proučil nekaj problematičnih peticij.
Availing itself of the possibility granted under Rule 192, the Committee on Petitions conducted in 2006 several fact-finding missions aiming to investigate some problematic petitions 'in situ'.
Obiski so bili organizirani po tem, ko je odbor zadevo ustrezno obravnaval in jasno določil njihov namen.
The visits were organised once the issues had been properly debated in Committee and their objectives clearly defined.
Tovrstni obiski občutno povečajo zmožnost odbora, da razume različne vidike peticij in poišče rešitve kompleksnih problemov v sodelovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi.
Such visits substantially enhance the committee's ability to understand the different aspects of the petitions and to seek solutions to complex problems in cooperation with all interested parties.
Hkrati pa je to priložnost za neposreden stik z evropskimi državljani in nacionalnimi oblastmi, kar prispeva k splošnemu prizadevanju za ozaveščanje o dejavnostih odbora.
At the same time, they occasion a direct contact with European citizens and national authorities contributing to the general effort to raise awareness about the activity of the Committee.
Organizirani so bili štirje tovrstni obiski: na Malti (9.–11. maja 2006), v Španiji (25. in 26. junija 2006), na Poljskem (11.–14. julija 2006) in v Združenem kraljestvu (5. in 6. decembra 2006).
Four such fact-finding missions were organised: in Malta (9-11 May 2006), Spain (25-26 June 2006), Poland (11-14 July 2006) and United Kingdom (5-6 December 2006).
Namen obiska na Malti, ki ga je opravil predsednik odbora, je bil deloma predstaviti delo odbora malteškim oblastem, pa tudi srečanje z državljani z otokov, ki so dotlej vložili peticije.
The object of the visit to Malta, which was undertaken by the Chairman of the Committee, was in part to introduce the work of the Committee to the Maltese authorities and to meet some of the citizens from the islands who have petitioned the Committee so far.
Predsednik je tudi razpravljal o dejavnostih odbora z malteškim varuhom človekovih pravic in poslanci.
The Chairman also held useful discussions on the activity of the Committee with the Maltese Ombudsman and members of the House of Representatives.
Glavni del obiska je omogočil poglobljeno preučitev domnev o tem, kako se direktiva o pticah uporablja v zvezi s pticami selivkami.
The key part of the visit allowed an in-depth investigation into the allegations which have been made concerning the way in which the Directive on Birds is applied in relation to migratory bird species.
Obisk je sledil peticijam, ki jih je vložilo več združenj in oseb, o premajhnem nadzoru nad lovom na zaščitene ptice in možno kršitvijo evropske zakonodaje, zapisane v direktivah o pticah in habitatih.
The visit followed petitions submitted by several associations and persons claiming insufficient controls of hunting of protected birds and possible infringement of EU legislation as set out in the Birds and Habitats Directives.
V Španiji se je delegacija odbora osredotočila na preučitev domnev številnih vlagateljev peticij v zvezi z gradnjo avtoceste M30 v Madridu in okoli njega.
In Spain, the Committee's delegation focussed on investigating the allegations made by a number of petitioners concerning the ongoing construction of the M30 motorway project in and around Madrid.
Evropska komisija je 4. aprila z ločeno odločbo pričela postopek za ugotavljanje kršitve.
The European Commission, in a separate decision, opened infringement proceedings on April 4th.
Člani delegacije so se med svojim obiskom srečali z organi oblasti, lokalnimi prebivalci, ki jih je projekt zadeval, in drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi.
The members of the fact-finding visit met with public authorities, local residents affected by the project and other interested parties during the course of their visit.
Poslanci naj bi na obisku na Poljskem (Varšava in Poznanj) dobili pregled nad ukrepi, ki jih je poljska vlada sprejela glede evropskega povezovanja, ter nad trenutnim stanjem.
The visit to Poland (Warsaw and Poznan) was intended to give Members an overview of the measures taken by the Polish government concerning European integration as well as the current state of affairs.
Člani delegacije so se srečali z novima predsednikoma odborov za evropske zadeve v senatu in parlamentu, pa tudi s predsednikom poljskega parlamenta (sejma).
Members of the delegation had the possibility to meet the new Chairmen of the Senate's and the Sejm's Committees on European Affairs, as well as the president (Marshal) of the Polish Parliament (Sejm).
V Poznanju so se poslanci udeležili seminarja na temo „Evropski sistem varovanja človekovih pravic“ na univerzi Adama Mickiewicza, na katerem so sodelovali tudi njen rektor, red. prof. dr.
In Poznan Members took part in the Seminar on "European System of Human Rights Protection" in the Adam Mickiewicz University with the participation of the Rector, Prof. dr. hab.
Stanislaw Lorenc, evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamanduros, red. prof. dr.
Stanislaw Lorenc, the European Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros, Prof. dr. hab.
Pawel Bortkiewicz in predsednik Marcin Libicki.
Pawel Bortkiewicz and Marcin Libicki , chairman.
Med obiskom v Varšavi so se srečali tudi z vlagatelji peticij o prometnem koridorju „Via Baltica“, zahodnovaršavskem cestnem obroču, vzpenjači Kuznice–Kasprowy Wierch v območju Natura 2000 v Tatrah in okoljskem vplivu baltskega plinovoda.
A meeting with petitioners, who had submitted petitions on respectively the transport corridor "Via Baltica", the Eastern Warsaw Ring Road, the cableway "Kuznice-Kasprowy Wierch" in the Nature 2000 site "Tatry" and the environmental impact of the Baltic Sea gas pipeline took place during the stay in Warsaw.
Glavna točka na dnevnem redu obiska v Združenem kraljestvu je bilo srečanje v uradu Evropskega parlamenta v Londonu, da bi ugotovili, zakaj je Odbor za peticije zaprl Lloydove peticije, se posvetovali z enoto za peticije v premierjevem uradu in z vlagatelji peticij razpravljali o vprašanjih multiple skleroze.
The agenda of the visit to the United Kingdom had as main points a meeting in the European Parliament Office in London in order to explain the reasons which led the Committee on Petitions to close the Lloyd's petitions, consultations in the Petitions Unit of the Prime Minister's Office and discussion of the Multiple Sclerosis matters with petitioners.
Ker je odbor prejel številne nove peticije v zvezi z multiplo sklerozo in ker je pomembno nadaljevati od poročila odbora leta 2003, ker je odbor o tej temi poglobljeno razpravljal na novembrski seji, kjer so sodelovali tudi nekdanja poročevalka Parlamenta Uma Aaltonen, predstavniki nevladne organizacije European Multiple Sclerosis Platform, pa tudi združenj za multiplo sklerozo iz večine držav EU.
Given a number of new petitions related to Multiple Sclerosis and the importance to follow-up to the Committee's December 2003 Report, the Committee had re-discussed the issue in-depth during its November meeting with the participation of Parliament's former Rapporteur, Uma Aaltonen, of representatives of the European Multiple Sclerosis Platform as well as those of the Multiple Sclerosis societies from most EU countries.
Komisija in finsko predsedstvo sta predstavila izjavi o napredku glede kodeksa dobrega ravnanja, k čemur je Parlament pozval v svoji resoluciji.
The Commission and the Finnish Presidency made statements on the progress toward a Code of Good Practice which Parliament called for in its resolution.
To poročilo vsebuje pregled glavnih točk iz dejavnosti odbora za peticije v letu 2006, pri čemer so poudarjeni njegovi dosežki in področja, kjer bi bil potreben še dodaten napredek.
The current report offers an overview of the main elements characterizing the activity of the Committee on Petitions in 2006, pointing out its achievements and areas where further progress is needed.
Odbor se je pri svojem delu osredotočil na to, da bi vlagateljem peticij zagotovil najustreznejši odgovor.
The work of the Committee focussed on providing petitioners with the most appropriate redress.
Pri izpolnjevanju tega cilja je odbor deloval tako, da je zagotavljal pregledno in učinkovito obravnavanje peticij ter da so državljani dobili izčrpne odgovore na svoja vprašanja.
In pursuing this objective the Committee has worked towards ensuring that petitions are managed in a transparent and effective way and that citizens do obtain comprehensive answers to the issues they raise.
Pri tem je bilo poglavitno sodelovanje z drugimi evropskimi institucijami, zlasti z Evropsko komisijo.
In doing so, relations with other European institutions and bodies and, in particular, the European Commission remains very important.
Podrobnosti iz posameznih zadev, poročil, mnenj in dokumentov s sej Odbora za peticije so na voljo na njegovi spletni strani.
Details of specific cases, Reports, Opinions and documents of the meetings of the Committee on Petitions are available on its website page .
PRILOGA I: Peticije, ki jih je prejel Parlament
ANNEX I: Petitions received by Parliament
PRILOGA II: Statistika peticij, prejetih leta 2006, razdeljena po jeziku
ANNEX II - Statistics of the petitions received in 2006 based on the language of the petitions
nemščina 274
German 274
angleščina 177
English 177
španščina 127
Spanish 127
francoščina 69
French 69
grščina 68
Greek 68
italijanščina 68
Italian 68
poljščina 56
Polish 56
nizozemščina 20
Dutch 20
portugalščina 18
Portuguese 18
švedščina 11
Swedish 11
madžarščina 7
Hungarian 7
finščina 5
Finnish 5
slovaščina 4
Slovak 4
češčina 4
Czech 4
danščina 3
Danish 3
slovenščina 2
Slovenian 2
latvijščina 1
Latvian 1
estonščina 1
Estonian 1
PRILOGA III: Korespondenca, ki jo je prejel odbor
ANNEX III: Correspondence received by the Committee
Prejeti dopisi
Received letters
Poslani dopisi
Sent letters
PRILOGA IV: Peticije, obravnavane v odboru leta 2006 (točke A)
ANNEX IV: Petitions discussed in the Committee in 2006 (A points)
o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi Solidarnostnega sklada EU v skladu s točko 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund according to point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
Odbor za ustavne zadeve
Committee on Budgets
PRILOGA: SKLEP EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA Error!
ANNEX: DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL.........4
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0526 - C6-0286/2007 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council ( COM(2007)0526 - C6-0286/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0393/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0393/2007 ),
1. ter zlasti točke 26 sporazuma,
1. , and in particular point 26 thereof,
UL C […], […], str.[…]. ,
OJ C […], […], p. […] ,
(1) Evropska unija je ustanovila Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije („Sklad“), da bi pokazala svojo solidarnost prebivalstvu območij, ki so jih prizadele nesreče.
(1) The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the "Fund") to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(2) Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 omogoča uporabo Sklada do letne zgornje meje 1 milijarde EUR.
(2) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
(3) Uredba (ES) št. 2012/2002 vsebuje določbe, v skladu s katerimi se sklad lahko uporabi.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.
(4) Nemčija in Francija sta posredovali vloge za uporabo Sklada v zvezi z dvema nesrečama, ki sta ju povzročila hudo neurje oziroma tropski ciklon –
(4) Germany and France submitted applications to mobilise the Fund, concerning two disasters caused by a major storm and a tropical cyclone respectively,
Komisija predlaga uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v korist Nemčije in Francije (Reunion) na osnovi točke 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Solidarity Fund in favour of Germany and France (La Réunion) on the basis of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
Nemčija in Francija sta zaprosili za pomoč iz Sklada po naravni katastrofi, ki je povzročila veliko škodo, zlasti januarja in februarja letos.
Germany and France applied for assistance from the Fund, following natural disasters that caused serious damage, respectively in January and February of this year.
Komisija predlaga uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada EU za skupni znesek v višini 172 195 985, ki se dodeli v okviru razdelka 3b finančnega okvira.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the EU solidarity Fund for a total amount of EUR 172 195 985, to be allocated under heading 3b of the Financial Framework.
Odbor za regionalni razvoj, zaprošen za mnenje, je 3. oktobra sklenil, da v zvezi s tem predlogom ne bo ukrepal, da ne bi upočasnil postopka dodeljevanja.
The Regional Affairs Committee, asked for an opinion, decided on 3 October to take no action on this proposal, in order not to slow down the allocation process.
Povzetek zneska za škodo in pomoč, ki jo predlaga Komisija:
The amount of damage and the aid proposed by the Commission can be resumed as follows:
Predlagana pomoč
Aid Proposed
vihar Kyrill
storm Kyrill
Francija/Reunion, ciklon Gamede
France/La réunion, cyclone Gamede
Poročevalec predlaga odobritev predloga Komisije.
The Rapporteur recommends approval of the Commission proposal.
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU ( 1 )
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................21
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................21
MNENJE Odbora za peticije ...........................................................................................23
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions ...............................................................23
Del 2 - A6‑0000/2007
Part 2 - A6-0000/2007
- ob upoštevanju člena 272 Pogodbe ES,
- having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta 2000/597/ES, Euratom z dne 29. septembra 2000 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti
- having regard to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources
Uredba, spremenjena z Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 1995/2006 (UL L 390, 30.12.2006, str.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p.
- ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
Sporazum, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/708/ES (UL L 269, 14.10.2005, str.
Agreement as last amended by Decision 2005/708/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 269, 14.10.2005, p.
24). , zlasti pa točke 26 tega sporazuma,
24). , and in particular point 26 thereof,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. marca 2007 o smernicah za proračunski postopek za leto 2008 - Oddelki II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII in IX - in predhodnega predloga načrta odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta (Oddelek I) za proračunski postopek za leto 2008
- having regard to its resolution of 29 March 2007 on the guidelines for the 2008 budget procedure - Sections II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII and IX and on the European Parliament's preliminary draft estimates (Section I) for the 2008 budget procedure
Sprejeta besedila s tem datumom, P6_TA(2007)0099 . ,
Texts adopted of that date , P6_TA(2007)0099 . ,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. junija 2007 o načrtu prihodkov in odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2008
- having regard to its resolution of 7 June 2007 on Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2008
Sprejeta besedila s tem datumom, P6_TA(2007)0237 . ,
Texts adopted of that date , P6_TA(2007)0237 . ,