natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(4) Ni razloga, da se zahteva takšna proučitev za delničarje s strani neodvisnega strokovnjaka, če se vsi delničarji strinjajo, da je ne potrebujejo.
(4) There is no reason to require such an examination by an independent expert for the shareholders if all the shareholders agree that it may be dispensed with.
Nobena sprememba direktiv 78/855/EGS in 82/891/EGS, ki dovoljuje take dogovore delničarjev, ne bi smela posegati v sisteme varovanja interesov upnikov vključenih družb, ki jih vzpostavijo države članice v skladu s tema direktivama, ali v predpise, ki zagotavljajo obveščanje zaposlenih v vključenih družbah.
Any modification of Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC allowing such agreement by shareholders should be without prejudice to the systems of protection of the interests of creditors of the companies involved, to be established by Member States in accordance with those Directives, as well as to any rules aimed at ensuring the provision of information to the employees of the companies involved.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 31. julija 2008.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 July 2008 at the latest.
Komisiji takoj posredujejo besedila teh predpisov in korelacijsko tabelo med temi predpisi in direktivo.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 31. decembra 2008.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 2008 at the latest.
Poročevalka podpira cilj Komisije, da se olajšajo nacionalne združitve ali delitve.
The rapporteur supports the Commission in its aim of easing domestic mergers or divisions.
Predlog je del širšega prizadevanja za zmanjšanje upravne obremenitve, ki naj bi prispevalo k uresničevanju ciljev lizbonske strategije, zlasti povečanju gospodarske rasti in ustvarjanju številnejših in boljših delovnih mest s sproščanjem in preusmerjanjem podjetniških virov in s tem večanjem konkurenčnosti gospodarstva EU.
The proposal is part of the wide ranging administrative burden reduction exercise contributing to the goals of the Lisbon strategy, in particular the improvement of economic growth and the creation of more and better jobs, by freeing up and redirecting business resources and thus enhancing the competitiveness of the EU's economies.
Direktiva Sveta 78/855/EGS in direktiva Sveta 82/891/EGS določata, da en ali več strokovnjakov, ki delujejo neodvisno, vendar v imenu vsake od delniških družb, ki se združujejo ali delijo, in ki ga/jih imenuje ali potrdi sodni ali upravni organ, pregleda načrt združitve in pripravi poročilo za delničarje.
Council Directive 78/855/EEC and Council Directive 82/891/EEC, state that one or more experts, acting independent but on behalf of each of the merging public limited liability companies or the dividing public limited liability company, appointed or approved by a judicial or administrative authority, shall examine the draft terms of merger or division and draw up a written report to the shareholders.
Poročilo mora pojasniti načrt združitve ali delitve ter njegov pravni in gospodarski temelj, zlasti pa metode, ki so bile uporabljene pri izračunu predlaganega menjalnega razmerja delnic.
This report must explain the draft terms of merger or division and their legal and economic ground, especially the method(s) used to calculate the share exchange ratio proposed.
V primeru združitve je to poročilo v skladu z direktivo 78/855/EGS obvezno.
In case of a merger this report is mandatory according to Directive 78/855/EEC.
Za delitve je poročilo v skladu z direktivo 82/891/EGS obvezno, če zadevna država članica ni uporabila možnosti, da dovoli oprostitev obveznosti izdelave poročila, in kadar se s tem strinjajo vsi delničarji in imetniki drugih vrednostih papirjev, ki dajejo pravico do glasovanja, vseh družb, vključenih v delitev.
Under Directive 82/891/EEC concerning divisions the report is mandatory if the Member State in question has not used the option to permit non-application of the provision requiring the report if all the shareholders and the holders of other securities giving the right to vote of the companies involved in the division have so agreed.
Stroški teh poročil po danskih ocenah upravnega bremena znašajo približno 3.500 EUR na združitev ali delitev.
The costs of these reports are estimated to approximately EUR 3.500 per merger or division, according to figures from the Danish measurement exercise.
Poročilo zlasti pri malih in srednje velikih podjetjih, v katerih je v upravljanje vključeno le omejeno število delničarjev, ne vsebuje dodatnih informacij.
In particular when SMEs with a limited number of shareholders who are involved in the management are concerned, this report gains no additional information.
Med možnostma, ki sta na voljo, namreč (1) odprava obveznosti izdelave poročila, razen če delničarji ne zaprosijo zanj, in (2) odprava te obveznosti, kadar se vsi delničarji strinjajo, da poročilo ni potrebno, je druga možnost tista, ki najbolje usklajuje obstoječe interese.
Among the available options of (1) abolition of the requirement unless shareholders ask for it and (2) abolition of the requirement in cases where all the shareholders agree that it is not needed, the second option balances the interests in question at best.
Obe možnosti lahko prineseta korist družbam, ki teh poročil ne potrebujejo, saj bo njihova izdelava odslej prostovoljna.
Both options might lead to benefits for companies not in need for these reports by making them voluntarily.
Če je poročilo potrebno in koristno, se ne bodo več kot zdaj izgubljale koristne informacije.
In case where a report is needed and useful no information will be lost compared to the current situation.
Poleg tega druga možnost usklajuje direktive s členom 8(4) direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/56/ES o čezmejnih združitvah kapitalskih družb.
Furthermore, option 2 brings the Directives in line with Article 8 (4) of the Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies.
Poročevalka zato v celoti soglaša s predlogom Komisije.
The rapporteur therefore fully agrees with the Commission proposal.
Poudarja, da se predlogi sprememb predlagane direktive nanašajo le na določbe o varovanju delničarjev.
She emphasises that the provisions subject to the amendments by the proposed Directive concern only the field of shareholder protection.
Drugi interesi, kot je denimo varovanje upnikov, ostajajo nespremenjeni.
Other interests, e.g. creditor protection, are not affected.
Združitev in delitev delniških družb
Mergers and divisions of public limited liability companies
Odbori, ki niso podali mnenja
Not delivering opinion
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o notranjem prevozu nevarnega blaga
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inland transport of dangerous goods
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0852 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0852 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 71 pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0012/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 71 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0012/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0253/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0253/2007 ),
(6a) Določbe te direktive se ne bi smele nanašati na prevoz nevarnega blaga, ki ga neposredno opravijo ali nadzirajo oborožene sile.
(6a) The provisions of this Directive should not apply to the transport of dangerous goods under the direct and physical responsibility or supervision of the armed forces.
Vseeno pa bi moral biti v direktivi zajet prevoz nevarnega blaga, ki ga opravijo komercialni izvajalci, ki delajo za oborožene sile, razen če pri opravljanju pogodbenih obveznosti neposredno sodelujejo ali jih nadzorujejo oborožene sile.
The transport of dangerous goods carried out by commercial contractors working for the armed forces should, however, fall within the scope of this Directive unless their contractual duties are exercised under the direct and physical responsibility or supervision of the armed forces .
(6b) Za države članice, ki železniškega sistema nimajo in v bližnji prihodnosti tudi ne predvidevajo njegove vzpostavitve, bi bila obveznost prenosa in izvajanja določb direktive, ki zadevajo železniški prevoz, nesorazmerna in nesmotrna.
(6b) A Member State which has no railway system, and no immediate prospect of having one, would be under a disproportionate and pointless obligation if it had to transpose and implement the provisions of this Directive in respect of rail.
Zato je treba države članice brez vzpostavljenega železniškega sistema izvzeti iz obveznosti prenosa in izvajanja direktive, kar zadeva železniški prevoz.
Therefore, such a Member State should be exempted, for as long as it has no railway system, from the obligation to transpose and implement this Directive in so far as rail is concerned.
(7a) Brez poseganja v pravo Skupnosti in določbe poglavja 1.9 prilog I.1, II.1 in III.1 bi moralo biti državam članicam omogočeno, da zaradi prometne varnosti ohranjajo ali oblikujejo določbe na področjih, ki jih ta direktiva ne zajema.
(7a) Without prejudice to Community law and the provisions of Chapter 1.9 of Annexes I.1, II.1 and III.1, it should be possible for Member States, for reasons of transport safety, to maintain or establish provisions in areas not covered by this Directive.
Te določbe morajo biti specifične in jasno opredeljene.
These provisions should be specific and clearly defined.
(7b) Vsaka država članica bi morala ohraniti pravico do urejanja ali prepovedi prevoza nevarnega blaga na svojem ozemlju izključno iz razlogov, ki niso varnostnega značaja, kot na primer zaradi nacionalne varnosti ali varovanja okolja.
( 7b) Each Member State should maintain the right to regulate or prohibit the transport of dangerous goods within its territory, strictly for reasons other than safety, such as reasons of national security or environmental protection.
(8) Prevoznim sredstvom, ki so registrirana v tretjih državah, je dovoljeno izvajati mednarodni prevoz nevarnega blaga na ozemljih držav članic, vendar morajo biti ta prevozna sredstva v skladu z ustreznimi določbami ADR, RID ali ADN.
(8) Means of transport registered in third countries should be allowed to perform the international transport of dangerous goods within the territories of the Member States subject to compliance with the relevant provisions of the ADR, RID or ADN.
(8) Prevoznim sredstvom, ki so registrirana v tretjih državah, je dovoljeno izvajati mednarodni prevoz nevarnega blaga na ozemljih držav članic, vendar morajo biti ta prevozna sredstva v skladu z ustreznimi določbami ADR, RID ali ADN in v skladu s to direktivo .
(8) Means of transport registered in third countries should be allowed to perform the international transport of dangerous goods within the territories of the Member States subject to compliance with the relevant provisions of the ADR, RID or ADN and this Directive.
(9) Vsaka država članica mora ohraniti pravico do urejanja ali prepovedi, izključno iz razlogov, ki niso varnostni, notranjega prevoza nevarnega blaga.
(9) Each Member State should maintain the right to regulate or prohibit, strictly for reasons other than safety, the national transport of dangerous goods.
Prestavljeno v uvodno izjavo 7b.
Moved to recital 7b.
(10) Vsaka država članica mora imeti možnost, da za notranji prevoz, ki ga izvajajo vozila, registrirana ali dana v uporabo na njenem ozemlju, uporabi strožje predpise.
(10) Each Member State should be able to apply more stringent rules to national transport operations performed by vehicles registered or put into circulation within its territory.
(10) Vsaka država članica mora imeti možnost, da za notranji prevoz, ki ga opravijo prevozna sredstva , registrirana ali dana v uporabo na njenem ozemlju, uporabi strožje predpise.
(10) Each Member State should be able to apply more stringent rules to national transport operations performed by means of transport registered or put into circulation within its territory.
(11) Uskladitev pogojev, ki se uporabljajo za notranji prevoz nevarnega blaga, ne sme preprečiti upoštevanja določenih nacionalnih okoliščin.
(11) The harmonisation of the conditions applying to the national transport of dangerous goods should not prevent specific national circumstances from being taken into account.
Ta direktiva mora zato državam članicam omogočiti, da dovolijo določena odstopanja pod določenimi prepoznanimi pogoji.
This Directive should therefore provide Member States with the possibility of granting certain derogations under certain identified conditions.
Taka odstopanja morajo biti v tej direktivi navedena kot „ dodatne nacionalne določbe “.
Such derogations should be listed in this Directive as " additional national provisions ".
Taka odstopanja morajo biti v tej direktivi navedena kot „nacionalna odstopanja “.
Such derogations should be listed in this Directive as "national derogations ".
(11a) V nenavadnih in izjemnih razmerah bi morale imeti države članice pravico, da izdajo posamezna dovoljenja za prevoz nevarnega blaga na njihovem ozemlju, ki ga sicer ta direktiva prepoveduje.
( 11a) In order to address unusual and exceptional situations, Member States should have the right to issue individual authorisations allowing the transport of dangerous goods within their territory, which would otherwise be prohibited by this Directive.
(12) Glede na višino naložb, potrebnih v tem sektorju, je treba državam članicam dovoliti, da začasno obdržijo posebne nacionalne določbe v zvezi z zahtevami glede izdelave prevoznih sredstev ali opreme, prevozom skozi Rokavski predor ter prevozom med državami članicami in državami, ki so pogodbenice Organizacije za sodelovanje železnic (OSJD) .
(12) In view of the level of investment required in this sector, Member States should be permitted to retain on a temporary basis certain specific national provisions concerning the construction requirements of the means of transport or equipment, transport through the Channel Tunnel and transport between Member States and States which are parties to the Organisation for Cooperation of Railways (OSJD).
Take določbe morajo biti v tej direktivi navedene kot „dodatne prehodne določbe“.
Such provisions should be listed in this Directive as “additional transitory provisions” .
(12) Glede na višino naložb, potrebnih v tem sektorju, je treba državam članicam dovoliti, da začasno obdržijo posebne nacionalne določbe v zvezi z zahtevami glede izdelave prevoznih sredstev ali opreme in prevozom skozi Rokavski predor.
(12) In view of the level of investment required in this sector, Member States should be permitted to retain on a temporary basis certain specific national provisions concerning the construction requirements of the means of transport or equipment and transport through the Channel Tunnel.
Dokler ne bodo usklajena pravila iz Priloge II k Sporazumu o mednarodnem železniškem tovornem prometu (SMGS) in določbe iz priloge II.1 in posledično pravilnika RID, se državam članicam omogoči, da ohranijo in oblikujejo odločbe za železniški prevoz nevarnega blaga med državami članicami in državami, ki so pogodbenice Organizacije za sodelovanje železnic (OSJD).
Member States should also be permitted to maintain and develop provisions for the transport of dangerous goods by rail between Member States and States which are contracting parties to the Organisation for Cooperation of Railways (OSJD) until the rules of Annex II to the Agreement concerning International Freight Traffic by Rail (SMGS) and the provisions of Annex II.1 and thereby the RID have been harmonised.
Komisija v desetih letih po začetku veljavnosti te direktive oceni učinke določb in po potrebi predloži ustrezne predloge.
Within 10 years after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission should assess the consequences of these provisions and, if necessary, submit appropriate proposals.
Take določbe morajo biti v tej direktivi navedene kot „dodatne prehodne določbe“.
Such provisions should be listed in this Directive as “additional transitory provisions”.
(13) Potrebna je hitra prilagoditev prilog k tej direktivi znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku, vključno z razvojem novih tehnologij za sledenje in zasledovanje, predvsem za upoštevanje novih določb, ki so vključene v ADR, RID in ADN.
(13) It is necessary to be able rapidly to adapt the Annexes to this Directive to scientific and technical progress including the development of new technologies for tracking and tracing, in particular to take account of new provisions incorporated into the ADR, RID and ADN.
Predlogi sprememb k ADR, RID in ADN ter ustrezne prilagoditve prilog morajo začeti veljati sočasno.
The amendments to the ADR, RID and ADN and the corresponding adaptations to the Annexes should enter into force simultaneously.
Komisija mora državam članicam po potrebi nuditi finančna sredstva za prevod ADR, RID in ADN ter njihovih sprememb v njihove uradne jezike .
The Commission should provide Member States with financial support, as appropriate, for the translation of the ADR, RID and ADN and their modifications into their official language .
(14) Komisija mora biti tudi zmožna revidirati seznam dodatnih nacionalnih določb in se odločiti glede uporabe in izvajanja nujnih ukrepov v primeru nesreč in nezgod.
(14) The Commission should also be able to revise the lists of additional national provisions and to decide upon the application and implementation of emergency measures in the event of accidents or incidents.
(14) Komisija mora biti tudi zmožna revidirati seznam nacionalnih odstopanj in se odločiti glede uporabe in izvajanja nujnih ukrepov v primeru nesreč in nezgod.
(14) The Commission should also be able to revise the lists of national derogations and to decide upon the application and implementation of emergency measures in the event of accidents or incidents.
(22a) Za uporabo določb te direktive v zvezi s celinskimi plovnimi potmi mora biti državam članicam omogočeno prehodno obdobje dveh let, da bi tako zagotovili dovolj časa za sprejetje nacionalnih določb, oblikovanje zakonskega okvira in usposabljanje osebja.
(22a) Member States should be granted a transitional period of up to two years for the application of the provisions of this Directive in respect of inland waterways so as to allow sufficient time for the adaptation of national provisions, the establishment of legal frameworks and the training of personnel.
Za vsa dovoljenja za ladje in osebje, izdana pred ali med prehodnim obdobjem za uporabo določb te direktive v zvezi s celinskimi plovnimi potmi, bi moralo veljati prehodno obdobje petih let, razen če je na dovoljenju naveden krajši čas veljavnosti.
A general transitional period of five years should be granted for all ship and personnel certificates issued prior to or during the transitional period for the application of the provisions of this Directive in respect of inland waterways, unless a shorter period of validity is indicated in the certificate.
(23a) V skladu z odstavkom 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 1 se države članice spodbuja, da za svoje potrebe in v interesu Skupnosti izdelajo in objavijo lastne tabele, ki bodo čim bolj nazorno prikazovale korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos v nacionalno pravo.
(23a) In accordance with paragraph 34 of the Interinstitutional agreement on better law-making 1 , Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interest of the Community, their own tables, which will, as far as possible, illustrate the correlation between the Directive and the transposition measures and to make them public.
UL C 321, 31.12.2003, str.
OJ C 321 du 31.12.2003, p.
Z dodanimi določbami naj bi se izboljšal proces priprave zakonodaje in spremljanje izvajanja te direktive .
Added provisions should improve law-making proces and monitoring implementation of this directive.
Člen 1, odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 1, paragraph 1a (new)
Za države članice, ki nimajo železniškega sistema, določbe iz priloge II.1 ne veljajo, vse dokler na njihovem ozemlju takšnega sistema ni.
The provisions of Annex II.1 shall not apply to Member States which do not have a railway system, for as long as no such system is established within their territory.
Nekatere države članice Unije nimajo železniškega sistema.
Some EU Member States have no railways..
Ta direktiva ne vpliva na pravico države članice, da določi posebne varnostne zahteve za notranji in mednarodni prevoz nevarnega blaga na svojem ozemlju , če te zahteve niso zajete v to direktivo .
This Directive shall not affect the Member State ’s right to lay down specific safety requirements for the national or international transport of dangerous goods within their territories , in so far as they are not covered by this Directive .
Države članice lahko določijo posebne varnostne zahteve za notranji in mednarodni prevoz nevarnega blaga na svojem ozemlju v povezavi s:
Member States may lay down specific safety requirements for the national and international transport of dangerous goods within their territory as regards :
(a) prevozom nevarnega blaga z vozili, vagoni in plovili, namenjenimi plovbi po celinskih plovnih poteh, ki ni vključen v to direktivo;
(a) the transport of dangerous goods performed by vehicles, wagons and inland waterway vessels not covered by this Directive;
(b) uporabo predpisanih poti;
(b) the use of prescribed routes
(c) posebnimi pravili za prevoz nevarnega blaga na potniških vlakih.
(c) special rules for the transport of dangerous goods in passenger trains.
Komisija je o teh določbah obveščena in o njih obvesti tudi druge države članice.
The Commission shall be informed of such provisions and it shall inform the other Member States accordingly.
Države članice lahko urejajo ali prepovejo prevoz nevarnega blaga na svojem ozemlju in sicer izključno iz razlogov, ki niso povezani z varnostjo med prevozom.
Member States may regulate or prohibit, strictly for reasons other than safety during transport, the transport of dangerous goods within their territory.
Določba se lahko uporablja le, če pristojni organ dokaže, da so ukrepi nujni.
Application of this provision presupposes that the competent authority should provide evidence of the need for measures.
Države članice, ki nameravajo uvesti prevozne omejitve, morajo najprej dokazati, da so takšni ukrepi nujni.
Member States intending to impose transport restrictions should provide evidence of the need for measures in advance.
S predlogom spremembe se poskuša zagotoviti skladnost s členoma 1.9.3. in 1.9.4.
The amendment aims to guarantee coherence with 1.9.3. and 1.9.4.
RID za primere, ko države članice urejajo ali prepovejo prevoz nevarnega blaga na svojem ozemlju iz razlogov, ki niso povezani z varnostjo, da bi tako zagotovili zanesljivost načrtovanja.
RID in cases where Member States regulate or prohibit the transport of dangerous goods for reasons other than safety within their territory to assure planning reliability.
(4) „vozilo“ pomeni vsako motorno vozilo, namenjeno za uporabo na cesti, z vsaj štirimi kolesi in največjo konstrukcijsko določeno hitrostjo 25 km/h, ter njihove priklopnike, razen tirnih vozil ter kmetijskih in gozdarskih traktorjev z največjo konstrukcijsko določeno hitrostjo 40 km/h ter delovnih strojev ;
(4) ‘vehicle` means any motor vehicle intended for use on the road, having at least four wheels and a maximum design speed exceeding 25 km/h, and its trailers, with the exception of vehicles which run on rails, agricultural and forestry tractors having a maximum design speed not exceeding 40 km/h and mobile machinery ;