natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(g) Države članice preverijo dokazila o podpornih izjavah ter organizatorkam in organizatorjem državljanske pobude v roku dveh mesecev posredujejo uradno potrdilo o številu podpornih izjav, podanih v skladu s pravili, ki morajo biti razvrščene glede na državljanstvo podpornika.
(g) Within two months and after verifying the details of the statements of support, the Member States shall provide the organisers of citizens’ initiatives with official confirmation of the number of lawful statements of support, listed by nationality of the supporting persons.
Z ustreznimi ukrepi zagotovijo, da vsako podporno izjavo potrdi le ena od držav članic, in učinkovito preprečijo, da bi posamezno podporno izjavo potrdilo več držav članic ali več uradov znotraj posamezne države članice.
They shall take appropriate steps to ensure that every statement of support is confirmed only once by one of the Member States and that multiple confirmations by different Member States or different agencies of the same Member State are effectively prevented.
Sodelujoči uradi držav članic morajo upoštevati zakonodajo o varstvu osebnih podatkov.
The personal data is subject to data protection requirements, for which the relevant authorities of the Member States are held accountable.
Tretja stopnja državljanske pobude se začne, ko organizatorke in organizatorji vložijo državljansko pobudo pri Komisiji, konča pa z uradno odločitvijo Komisije o uspehu vložitve.
The third stage of the citizens’ initiative begins when the organisers presenting the citizens’ initiative to the Commission and ends with the Commission’s formal decision on whether presentation of the initiative has succeeded.
(a) Organizatorke in organizatorji morajo državljansko pobudo v skladu s predpisi vložiti pri Komisiji.
(a) A citizens’ initiative must be lawfully presented by the organisers to the Commission.
Ob vlogi je treba predložiti potrdila držav članic o številu podanih podpornih izjav.
The Member States’ confirmations on the number of statements of support must be submitted at the time of presentation.
(b) Komisija preveri reprezentativnost vložene državljanske pobude.
(b) The Commission verifies the representativeness of the citizens’ initiative as presented.
Državljanska pobuda je reprezentativna, ko
A citizens’ initiative is representative if:
· jo podpira vsaj milijon državljank in državljanov Unije,
· it is supported by at least one million Union citizens,
· ko so ti državljani iz vsaj četrtine držav članic,
· who are nationals of at least one quarter of the Member States,
· ko število državljanov posamezne države članice predstavlja vsaj 1/500 njenega prebivalstva.
· with the number of nationals of each Member State concerned amounting to at least 1/500 of that Member State’s population.
(c) V roku dveh mesecev od vložitve državljanske pobude mora Komisija odločiti, ali je bila vložitev pobude uspešna.
(c) Within two months of presentation of the citizens’ initiative the Commission must decide whether presentation of that initiative has been successful.
To mora vključevati tudi izjavo o tem, ali je državljanska pobuda reprezentativna ali ne.
The decision must include a statement on whether or not the initiative is representative.
Vložitev je mogoče zavrniti le iz pravnih razlogov in nikakor ne iz političnih razlogov.
Presentation of the initiative may be rejected only on legal grounds and not, on any account, on grounds of political expediency.
(f) Komisija na svojih spletnih straneh vodi javno dostopen seznam vseh uspešno vloženih državljanskih pobud.
(f) The Commission provides on its website, accessible to the public, an index of all successfully presented citizens’ initiatives.
Na četrti stopnji državljanske pobude Komisija podrobno obravnava vsebino pobude, stopnja pa se konča z uradno opredelitvijo stališča Komisije do zahteve državljanske pobude, naj Komisija poda zakonodajni predlog.
The fourth stage of the citizens’ initiative covers the Commission’s detailed consideration of the matters raised in the initiative and ends with the Commission’s formal statement of its position on the request in the initiative for it to submit a proposal for a legal act.
(a) Uspešno vložena državljanska pobuda Komisijo zavezuje, da se loti vsebinske obravnave državljanske pobude.
(a) A successfully presented citizens’ initiative obliges the Commission to look into the content of the matters raised by the initiative
(b) V okviru vsebinske obravnave Komisija prisluhne organizatorkam in organizatorjem državljanske pobude in jim ponudi možnost, da izčrpno predstavijo zadevo.
(b) To that end the Commission invites the initiative’s organisers to a hearing and gives them an opportunity to explain in detail the matters raised in the initiative.
(c) Komisija mora v treh mesecih sprejeti odločitev glede zahteve v državljanski pobudi.
(c) The Commission must take a decision on the request by the initiative within three months.
Če Komisija ne namerava podati predloga, svojo odločitev obrazloži Parlamentu ter organizatorkam in organizatorjem.
If it does not intend to submit a proposal it shall explain to Parliament and to the organisers its reasons for not doing so.
(e) Če Komisija ne sprejme sklepa o zahtevi, predloženi v državljanski pobudi, morata imeti Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti in evropski varuh človekovih pravic možnost, da preverita zadevo v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi EU.
(e) If the Commission fails to take any decision on the request submitted by the citizens' initiative, this is subject to the judicial scrutiny of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Ombudsman in accordance with the relevant provisions of EU law.
Načelo preglednosti
The principle of transparency
Organizatorke in organizatorji uspešno prijavljene državljanske pobude morajo po koncu postopka v ustreznem roku Komisiji predložiti poročilo o financiranju pobude, tudi o finančnih virih (poročilo o preglednosti).
The organisers of a successfully registered citizens’ initiative shall be required, within an appropriate period of time after the conclusion of the procedure, to present to the Commission a report on the funding of the initiative, including the sources of funding (transparency report).
Komisija pregleda poročilo in ga skupaj z mnenjem objavi.
The report shall be examined by the Commission and published together with an opinion.
Komisija mora praviloma vsebino zahteve državljanske pobude začeti obravnavati šele po predložitvi ustreznega poročila o preglednosti.
As a general rule the Commission should begin to address the content of a citizens’ initiative only after a transparency report has been presented in due form.
Pobuda evropskih državljanov je popolnoma novo orodje za krepitev demokracije v Evropski uniji in prvi korak k razvoju neposredne demokracije na nadnacionalni ravni.
The ECI represents a completely new instrument to strengthen democracy in the European Union.
Njena uvedba pa bi dolgoročno lahko prispevala k spodbujanju razvoja evropske javnosti.
Its introduction is a first step towards the development of supranational direct democracy and its implementation can help to promote the development of a European public space in the longer term.
Pravna podlaga za evropsko državljansko pobudo sta člen 11(4) prihodnje Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in člen 24(1) prihodnje Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The legal bases for the ECI can be found in the future Article 11(4) of the Treaty on European Union (EU Treaty, new version – EU Treaty n.v.) and in the future Article 24(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (FEU Treaty).
Pogoji in postopki, ki bodo zanjo veljali, bodo določeni z uredbo, sprejeto po rednem zakonodajnem postopku.
The conditions and procedures for the ECI are to be laid down by means of a regulation adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure.
Ko bo začela veljati lizbonska pogodba, bosta vse zakonodajne akte Evropske unije, bodisi v obliki uredbe, direktive ali sklepa, sprejemala Evropski parlament in Svet skupaj, in sicer na podlagi predloga Komisije, prim. člen 289 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, all European Union legislative acts, whether regulations, directives or decisions, will as a matter of principle be adopted jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal (see Article 289 FEU Treaty).
Pravni akti Unije se torej praviloma sprejemajo le na predlog Komisije, prim. člen 17(2) Pogodbe EU (nova različica).
In other words, in almost all cases the submission of a Commission proposal is a prerequisite for the adoption of a European legislative act (see Article 17(2) EU Treaty n.v.).
O vsebini pravice do pobude evropskih državljanov
As regards the substance of the right to participate in the ECI
V skladu s členom 11(4) Pogodbe EU (nove različice) se lahko državljani Unije odločijo za državljansko pobudo.
In accordance with Article 11(4) EU Treaty (n.v.), Union citizens may take a citizens' initiative.
Namen te določbe, kot posebne izpeljave pravice do demokratičnega sodelovanja v skladu s členom 10(3) Pogodbe EU (nova različica), je utemeljiti osebne pravice državljanov Unije do sodelovanja pri evropski državljanski pobudi.
As a specific consequence of the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union laid down in Article 10(3) EU Treaty (n.v.), this provision seeks to establish the individual right of each Union citizen to take part in the ECI.
Državljani EU lahko pri državljanski pobudi sodelujejo na dva načina: pobudo lahko organizirajo, lahko pa jo podprejo.
There are two ways in which Union citizens can take part in an ECI: as organisers, or as supporters.
Organizacija državljanske pobude vključuje prijavo in vložitev državljanske pobude Komisiji, organiziranje kampanj za pridobivanje podpornikov ter po potrebi – glede na oblikovanje postopka v državah članicah – zbiranje podpornih izjav, pa tudi predstavitev vsebine pobude Komisiji.
The work of organising an ECI involves submitting an application for registration of the initiative to the Commission, conducting publicity campaigns and, if necessary depending on how Member States design the procedures, gathering statements of support and explaining the nature of the initiative to the Commission.
Podporo državljanski pobudi oseba izrazi z ustrezno izjavo, da se strinja z vsebino pobude in podpira z njo povezano zahtevo Komisiji.
Union citizens can support an ECI by making a formal statement that they endorse the aim of the initiative and the corresponding request being made to the Commission.
Pravica do sodelovanja pri državljanski pobudi vključuje pravico do njene organizacije in podpore.
The right to participate in the ECI thus embraces both the right to organise and the right to support an ECI.
O razlikovanju med pobudo evropskih državljanov in peticijo Evropskemu parlamentu
As regards the differences between the ECI and a petition to the European Parliament
Glede na člen 24(2) skupaj s členom 227 Pogodbe o delovanju EU (sedaj člen 21(1) skupaj s členom 194 sedanje Pogodbe ES) kot tudi na člen 44 Listine o temeljnih pravicah EU imajo vsi državljani Unije in vse fizične ali pravne osebe s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v Uniji pravico, da na Evropski parlament naslovijo peticijo.
Pursuant to Article 24(2) in conjunction with Article 227 FEU Treaty (currently Article 21(1) in conjunction with Article 194 EC Treaty) and pursuant to Article 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, every Union citizen, every natural person resident in the Union and every legal person with a registered office in the Union has the right to address a petition to the European Parliament.
Pravica do sodelovanja pri državljanski pobudi v skladu s členom 11(4) Pogodbe EU (nova različica) se torej dotika evropske pravice do peticije in jo dopolnjuje, vendar je ne nadomešča in ji ni enaka.
The right to participate in the ECI, pursuant to Article 11(4) EU Treaty (n.v.), thus supplements and complements the European right to submit a petition; however, it does not replace it and is not identical to it.
Očitna je že razlika v naslovniku.
The difference in the addresses is immediately obvious.
Medtem ko je peticija naslovljena na Evropski parlament, je državljanska pobuda naslovljena na Komisijo.
Whereas petitions are addressed to the European Parliament, ECIs are addressed to the Commission.
Pravica do evropske peticije nagovarja neposredno osebo, ki je naslovila peticijo, kot neposredno ali posredno podvrženo pristojnosti Evropske unije ter ji nudi možnost, da se kot takšna neposredno obrne na Evropski parlament, da ga obvesti o določenih okoliščinah in tako zahteva spremembo takšnih okoliščin.
The European right of petition is granted to Union citizens in their capacity as persons directly or indirectly affected by the exercise of the European Union's sovereign powers and offers them the possibility, in that capacity, to address Parliament directly in order to inform it about a given state of affairs and call for that state of affairs to be remedied.
Nasprotno pa državljani Unije z državljansko pobudo prvič neposredno sodelujejo pri izvajanju pristojnosti Evropske unije, s tem ko jim omogoča, da kakor Svet in Evropski parlament od Komisije zahtevajo predložitev zakonodajnega predloga.
In contrast, for the first time the ECI enables Union citizens to participate directly in the exercise of the European Union's sovereign powers by giving them the possibility, like the Council or the European Parliament, to request the Commission to submit a legislative proposal.
Posledično so tudi pogoji obeh pravnih instrumentov različni.
As a result, the conditions governing the use of these two legal instruments also differ.
Tako je pravica do peticije omejena na zadeve, ki osebo, ki je naslovila peticijo, neposredno zadevajo, medtem ko takšna omejitev ne velja, niti ne bi bila smiselna, za sodelujoče v evropski državljanski pobudi.
The right of petition is restricted to matters which directly affect the petitioner or petitioners, whereas no such restriction applies to the participants in an ECI, and nor would such a restriction make sense.
Nasprotno pa se od udeležencev evropske državljanske pobude pričakuje, da spodbujajo evropski splošni interes in ravnajo v skladu z evropskim pravom, kot to velja za vse osebe, ki izvršujejo evropske pristojnosti.
Instead, like all persons exercising European powers, the participants in an ECI are required to foster the European general interest and to comply with European law.
Prav slednje po drugi strani ni pogoj za peticijo.
No such requirement must be met when submitting a petition.
Pri oblikovanju pogojev in postopkov, ki veljajo za evropsko državljansko pobudo, je vsekakor mogoče upoštevati podobnosti s peticijo, naslovljeno na Evropski parlament.
The similarities between the ECI and a petition to the European Parliament can certainly be taken into account when drawing up the conditions and procedures governing the initiative.
Vendar pa nikakor ni dopustno zabrisati vsebinske razlike med njima.
On no account, however, should the intrinsic differences be allowed to become blurred.
O najmanjšem številu držav članic
As regards the minimum number of Member States
V skladu s členom 11(4) Pogodbe EU (nova različica) morajo biti podporniki državljanske pobude državljani večjega števila držav članic.
Pursuant to Article 11(4) EU Treaty (n.v.), the Union citizens who support a European Citizens' initiative (ECI) must be nationals of a significant number of Member States.
Vsekakor se mora pri tej določitvi upoštevati cilj zahteve.
The purpose of this stipulation should, however, influence the figure established.
To je tudi razlog, da ima Komisija načeloma monopol nad podajanjem predlogov.
For that reason, the exclusive right to propose legislation rests, as a matter of principle, with the Commission.
V skladu s členom 76 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije je pravne akte s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice seveda mogoče sprejemati tudi na pobudo ene četrtine držav članic.
However, pursuant to Article 76 FEU Treaty legal acts dealing with matters relating to the area of freedom, security and justice may also be adopted on the initiative of a quarter of the Member States.
Že sama pogodba torej nakazuje število držav članic, ki naj bi predvidoma v zadostni meri upoštevalo interese za splošno evropsko blaginjo.
Accordingly, the Treaty itself gives a clue as to the number of Member States whose involvement would be sufficient to meet the requirement that the European general interest has been properly taken into account.
Pri oblikovanju državljanske pobude zakonodajalec ne bi smel nasprotovati tej oceni.
When laying down provisions governing the implementation of the ECI, the legislator should take care not to contradict this interpretation.
Seveda je namen zahteve, da so podporniki državljanske pobude državljani velikega števila držav članic, dosežen le takrat, ko je hkrati izpolnjena zahteva po najmanjšem številu podpornikov iz vsake posamezne države članice.
Admittedly, the requirement that the supporters of an ECI should be nationals of a substantial number of Member States makes little sense if it is not combined with a requirement stipulating the minimum number of supporters who must come from each of those Member States.
Smiselno usmeritev pri tem zagotavlja sam člen 11(4) Pogodbe EU, ki predpisuje milijon državljanov Unije, iz česar je mogoče razbrati, da se 1/500 prebivalstva zdi v zadostni meri reprezentativna.
Valuable guidance in this matter is provided by Article 11(4) EU Treaty itself, which, by setting a figure of one million Union citizens, contains an interpretation to the effect that 1/500 of the population should be regarded as sufficiently representative.
O postopku pobude evropskih državljanov
V. As regards the procedure for the ECI
Uredba mora poleg najmanjšega števila držav članic, iz katerih morajo biti podporniki pobude, določiti tudi postopek državljanske pobude.
In addition to the minimum number of Member States from which the supporters of an ECI must come, the regulation also has to govern the procedure for the ECI.
Postopek ima izključno praktičen namen; zagotoviti mora, da se lahko pravica posameznika do sodelovanja pri državljanski pobudi izvaja kar najbolj učinkovito in da demokratični značaj državljanske pobude v celoti učinkuje kot oblika neposrednega izvajanja vladnih pooblastil.
The procedure has a purely practical function, which is to ensure that the individual right to take part in an ECI can be exercised as effectively as possible and that full use is made of the democratic nature of the ECI as a form of direct exercise of public authority.
Postopek državljanske pobude bi bilo treba razčleniti na štiri stopnje, ki izhajajo neposredno iz člena 11(4) Pogodbe EU (nova različica): prijava – zbiranje – vložitev – opredelitev stališča.
The ECI procedure should be broken down into four stages that derive directly from Article 11(4) EU Treaty (n.v.): registration – gathering – submission – consideration.
Na prvi stopnji („prijava“) se Komisijo obvesti o vsebini in organizatorjih državljanske pobude.
In the first stage ("registration"), the Commission is informed about the content and the organisers of an ECI.
Potem se na tretji stopnji („vložitev“) Komisijo obvesti o ugotovitvah, do katerih so prišle države članice, na četrti stopnji („opredelitev stališča“) pa Komisija zavzame stališče do zahteve državljanske pobude.
In the third stage ("submission"), the Commission is then informed of the Member States' findings, and in the final stage ("consideration") the Commission adopts a position on the matters raised by the ECI.
Preden Komisija zavzame stališče do državljanske pobude, mora preveriti, če so v posameznem primeru dejansko izpolnjene pravne zahteve iz člena 11(4) Pogodbe EU (nova različica), torej dopustnost in reprezentativnost pobude.
Before adopting a position on an ECI, the Commission must check in particular whether the legal requirements of Article 11(4) EU Treaty (n.v.) have been met in the case in question, i.e. the admissibility and representativeness of the initiative.
To se zaradi preglednosti ne sme zgoditi v okviru politične ocene Komisije o vsebini državljanske pobude, temveč prej, da bi se izognili sumu, da so na odločitev vplivali politični razlogi.
For reasons of transparency, this should not be done as part of the Commission's political appraisal of the ECI, but should happen at an earlier stage in order to avoid any suspicion of being swayed by political considerations.
Preverjanje, če je državljanska pobuda dovolj reprezentativna (najmanj milijon podpornikov iz večjega števila držav članic), torej logično lahko poteka samo na tretji stopnji odločanja o uspehu vložitve državljanske pobude.
The sufficient representativeness of the ECI (at least one million supporters from a significant number of Member States) can thus only logically be checked during the third stage as part of the decision on the success of the presentation of the initiative.
Preverjanje dopustnosti državljanske pobude, torej, če vsebina pobude izpolnjuje pravne zahteve, pa mora potekati čim bolj na začetku postopka, da se tako organizatorjem državljanske pobude kot državam članicam, ki so pristojne za zbiranje podpornih izjav, zagotovi pravna varnost v zvezi s tem.
The admissibility of the ECI - i.e. whether its contents satisfy the legal requirements - should, on the other hand, be checked at as early a stage in the procedure as possible, in order to ensure legal certainty on this point both for those organising an ECI and for the Member States which are responsible for collecting the statements of support.
To preverjanje bi moralo zaradi tega potekati že na prvi stopnji kot del odločanja o uspehu prijave državljanske pobude.
This examination should thus already be conducted during the first stage as part of the decision on whether the ECI has been successfully registered.
Vsaka stopnja postopka se mora končati z uradno odločitvijo, ki jo organizatorji vsakokrat lahko sodno izpodbijajo.
Each stage of the procedure must end with a formal decision, each of which can be legally challenged by the organisers.
Poleg tega morajo biti odločitve Komisije o uspehu prijave in vložitve državljanske pobude, pa tudi potrdila držav članic o posameznih podpornih izjavah, po potrebi sodno preverljivi.
Both the Commission's decisions on the success of the application and the submission, and the Member States' confirmations of the individual expressions of support must also, if required, be subject to legal review.
s priporočili Komisiji o smernicah za predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvajanju državljanske pobude
with recommendations to the Commission on guidelines for a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the Citizen's Initiative
A. ker je pomembno upoštevati določbe, ki jih vsebuje lizbonska pogodba glede državljanske pobude in ki so namenjene temu, da omogočijo evropskim državljanom pomembnejšo neposredno vlogo pri oblikovanju evropskih zakonodajnih aktov, ki so potrebni za izvajanje pogodb,
A. whereas it is important to have regard to the provisions contained in the Lisbon Treaty relating to the Citizens' Initiative, which are designed to enable European citizens to play a more significant direct role in influencing European legislative acts which are required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties,
1. zahteva uredbo o izvajanju državljanske pobude, ki bo določala pogoje za uresničevanje te pravice ter bo jasna, enostavna in uporabnikom prijazna, vključevati pa mora tudi praktične elemente v zvezi z opredelitvijo državljanske pobude, da je ne bi zamenjevali s pravico do peticije;
Calls for the regulation on the implementation of the Citizens' Initiative, laying down the conditions for the exercise of the right in that regard, to be clear, simple and user-friendly, incorporating practical elements related to the definition of a Citizens Initiative in order that it should not be confused with the right of petition;