natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovijo, da se vsaka kršitev te uredbe, zlasti vsaka zloraba podatkov, predloženih za izdajo vizuma, kaznuje, tudi z administrativnimi in/ali kazenskimi sankcijami v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki so učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne.
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that any breach of this Regulation, in particular any misuse of data submitted for a visa application is punishable by penalties, including administrative and/or criminal penalties in accordance with national law, that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Ta predlog spremembe nadomesti predlog spremembe 29 iz osnutka poročila.
This amendment replaces Amendment 29 of the draft report.
Doda se nov del s splošno odgovornostjo za države članice, ki se zdi nujno potreben za delovanje VIS.
A new part is added with general responsibilities for Member States which seem indispensable for the functioning of the VIS.
Določba glede statusa dokumentov, podatkov in biometričnih identifikatorjev je pomembna, da se zagotovi, da so pod konzularnim varstvom.
A provision on the status of documents, data and biometric identifiers is important in order to ensure that they will benefit from consular protection.
Določba o usposabljanju je potrebna, ker registriranje biometričnih podatkov zahteva posebno strokovno znanje.
A provision on training is necessary, given the specific expertise the enrolment of biometrics requires.
Pravila o odgovornosti in kaznih so potrebne zaradi morebitne škode, ki izhaja iz dejanj, s katerimi se krši ta uredba.
Rules on liability and penalties are necessary in view of potential damage resulting from acts violating this Regulation.
Besedilo je bilo prečiščeno, da se uskladi z besedilom v Uredbi VIS.
The wording has been clarified to bring it into conformity with the wording in the VIS Regulation.
Komisija predloži poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o izvajanju te uredbe dve leti po začetku njene veljavnosti .
The Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of the present regulation two years after its entry into force .
Komisija , tri leta po začetku delovanja VIS in za tem vsaka štiri leta, predložiti poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o izvajanju te uredbe , v katerega je vključeno izvajanje registracije biometričnih identifikatorjev, primernost izbranega standarda Mednarodne organizacije za civilno letalstvo, spoštovanje pravil o varstvu podatkov, izkušnje s zunanjimi ponudniki storitev s posebno navedbo o zbiranju biometričnih podatkov, načelo „prve vloge“ ter organizacija sprejema in obravnavanja vlog za izdajo vizuma.
The Commission shall present , three years after the VIS is brought into operation and every four years thereafter, a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Regulation, including the implementation of the enrolment of biometric identifiers, the approp ria teness of the ICAO standard chosen, compliance with data protection rules, experience with external service providers with specific reference to the collection of biometric data, the principle of the “first application” and the organisation of the reception and the processing of visa applications .
Poročilo na podlagi člena 17(12), (13) in (14) ter člena 50(4) Uredbe VIS vključuje tudi primere, v katerih ni mogoče dejansko zabeležiti prstnih odtisov ali njihova predložitev ni zahtevana zaradi pravnih razlogov, v primerjavi s številom primerov, ko so prstni odtisi zabeleženi.
The report shall also include, on the basis of Article 17 (12), (13) and (14) and of Article 50(4) of the VIS Regulation, the cases in which fingerprints could factually not be provided or were not required to be provided for legal reasons compared with the number of cases in which fingerprints are taken.
Poročilo vključuje podatke o primerih, v katerih se osebi, ki prstnih odtisov dejansko ni mogla priskrbeti, zavrne izdaja vizuma.
The report shall include information on cases in which a person who could factually not provide fingerprints was refused a visa.
Poročilu se, kadar je potrebno, priložijo ustrezni predlogi za spremembo te uredbe.
The report shall be accompanied, where necessary, by approp ria te proposals to amend this Regulation.
Ta predlog spremembe združuje predlog spremembe 56 poročevalke, predlog spremembe 55 poslanke Sylvie-Yvonne Kaufmann in predlog spremembe 36 poslanke Martine Roure.
This compromise amendment combines Am 56 of the rapporteur, Am 55 of Mrs. Kaufmann and Am 36 of Mrs. Roure.
Pričujoči predlog je četrti element paketa VIS.
The present proposal is the 4th element of the VIS package.
S spremembo obstoječih skupnih konzularnih navodil
In modifying the existing Common Consular Instructions
Kljub temu, da je z vizumskim zakonikom
Although a complete revision of the visa rules is foreseen with the Visa Code
KOM(2006)403; poročilo pripravil Henrik Lax. predvidena popolna revizija vizumskih pravil, je Komisija ta predlog pripravila ločeno.
COM(2006)403; Report Lax the Commission has made this specific proposal separately.
Sklepanje v podlagi tega pristopa je, da bo za sprejetje vizumskega zakonika verjetno potrebno več časa kot za pričujoči predlog, katerega sprejetja bi lahko omogočilo začetek delovanja VIS
The underlying rationale of this approach is that the adoption of the Visa Code is likely to take longer than the present proposal of which the adoption could allow the VIS to start operating.
S tehničnega vidika bo predlog vključen v vizumski zakonik, ko bo o tem dosežen dogovor, kot je bilo žigosanje potnih listin (Ur.
Technically it will be inserted in the visa code once this is agreed like was the case for the stamping of documents (Reg.
2133/2004) vključeno v Zakonik o schengenskih mejah (Ur.
2133/2004) which was introduced in the Schengen Borders Code (Reg.
Poročevalka poudarja pomen zagotavljanja skladnosti med dvema predlogoma.
The rapporteur stresses the importance of ensuring coherence between the two proposals.
Uvod v tematska področja, ki so zajeta v tem predlogu, je poročevalka podala v dveh sočasnih delovnih dokumentih.
An introduction into the subject areas covered by the present proposal was given by the rapporteur in two simultaneous working documents.
PE 386.565v01-00, 386.717v01-00, predstavljena v Odboru LIBE 10.4. in 8.5.2007.
PE 386.565v01-00, 386.717v01-00 presented in LIBE on 10.4. and 8.5.2007.
V teh dokumentih, ki sta bila podlaga za več razprav, so bila opredeljena politično občutljiva vprašanja.
Those documents identified the politically sensitive questions and were the basis for several discussions.
Poročevalka je za pripravo tega osnutka poročila upoštevala tudi zelo koristni mnenji, ki sta ju predstavila Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov
For the preparation of this draft report the rapporteur also took into consideration the very helpful opinions presented by the European Data Protection Supervisor
Mnenje z dne 27.10.2006, UL C 321 z dne 29.12.2006, str.
Opinion of 27.10.2006, OJ C 321 of 29.12.2006, p.
38. in delovna skupina iz člena 29
38 and the Article 29 Working Party.
Mnenje 3/2007 z dne 1.3.2007 (WP 134). .
Opinion 3/2007 of 1.3.2007 (WP 134)
II.1 Prstni odtisi
II.1 Fingerprints
Poročevalka predlaga, da se na začetku oprostijo obveznosti dajanja prstnih odtisov osebe, mlajše od 14 in starejše od 79 let, po treh letih in po izvedbi natančne študije pa se ti starostni meji pregleda.
The rapporteur proposes to initially exempt persons below the age of 14 and over 79 from the obligation to provide fingerprints, with a review of these age limits after three years following a detailed study.
Izbira teh starostnih meja mora biti na tej stopnji politična in ni utemeljena na tehničnih smernicah iz enostavnega razloga, ker ni na voljo objektivnega in neodvisnega svetovanja.
The choice of these age limits have to be essentially a policy choice at this stage rather than one based on technical guidance, for the simple reason that objective, independent advice is lacking.
Komisija svojemu predlogu ni priložila presoje vpliva, kar je – glede na njene obljube in zaveze o boljši pravni ureditvi – vredno globokega obžalovanja in dokaj osupljivo.
There was no impact assessment accompanying the proposal from the Commission, which considering its promises and commitments on better regulation is deeply regrettable and pretty shocking.
Kaže, da je Komisija zgolj pripravila predlog, ki odraža zlasti razprave z državami članicami v Svetu.
The Commission seems just to have put forward a proposal largely reflecting discussions which took place with the Member States in the Council.
Poleg tega ni na voljo obsežnih izkušenj glede jemanja prstnih odtisov otrokom, mlajšim od 14 let, ali starejšim osebam.
In addition, there exists no large-scale experience of fingerprinting children under 14 or elderly persons.
Poročevalka zato meni, da je v odsotnosti verodostojnih strokovnih smernic v začetni fazi pametno uporabiti starostne omejitve, ki so zagotovo uporabne, ter se s tem izogniti nepotrebnemu tveganju, da bi projekt VIS postal velik eksperiment.
Thus in the absence of credible technical guidance the rapporteur believes that it is wise in the initial stage to adopt age limits which we are sure will be workable, thereby avoiding unnecessary risks of turning the VIS project into a big experiment.
Ker sta trenutno edini primerljivi obsežni uporabi prstnih odtisov tisti v okviru Eurodac (najnižja starost 14 let) in US-Visit (14 do 79 let), bi bilo treba ti starostni omejitvi uporabiti tudi v začetni fazi VIS.
Since the only currently comparable large-scale applications of fingerprints are Eurodac (minimum age 14 years) and US-Visit (14 to 79 years) those age limits should also be used for an initial period for the VIS.
A četudi bi obstajala preizkušena tehnologija odvzemanja prstnih odtisov otrokom v zelo zgodnji starosti, bi bilo treba dvakrat razmisliti in se vprašati o primernosti, potrebnosti in sorazmernosti tega.
But even if there was proven technology to fingerprint children of a very low age one should think twice and ask about how appropriate, necessary and proportionate that would be.
Takšne celovite analize tu ni mogoče izvesti, čeprav poročevalka meni, da bi nadaljnji razmislek zaslužile vsaj točke, ki jih navaja v nadaljevanju.
Such a full analysis cannot be done here, although the rapporteur believes that at least the following points would deserve further reflection.
Kot prvo je treba razmisliti, ali je jemanje prstnih odtisov otrokom, mlajšim od 14 let, potrebno za doseganje ciljev VIS, ki so navedeni v členu 1a dogovorjenega besedila.
Firstly, it has to be considered whether the taking of fingerprints of children below the age of 14 is necessary to achieve the objectives of the VIS as laid down in Article 1a of the agreed text.
Za prvi cilj – poenostavitev postopka za pridobitev vizumov – prstni odtisi majhnih otrok niso potrebni.
For the first objective, facilitating the visa application procedure, fingerprints of young children are not necessary.
Nasprotno, to bi zapletlo postopek predložitve vloge za vizum, saj bi otrok moral priti na konzulat, da se mu vzame prstne odtise.
On the contrary, this would complicate the application for a visa through the child having to come to the consulate to provide their fingerprints.
Ker se prstni odtisi otrok spreminjajo, si lahko predstavljamo nesmiseln položaj, ko bi bilo treba jemati prstne odtise otrok na primer vsake dve leti, prstne odtise staršev pa vsaka štiri leta ali vsakih pet let.
Since the fingerprints of children are subject to change, we could see the absurd situation where fingerprints of children would have to be taken for example every two years while those of the parents were taken every four or five years.
Za drugi cilj VIS – preprečevanje trgovanja z vizumi – so nižje starostne omejitve prav tako nepotrebne, saj majhni otroci običajno potujejo s svojimi starši, njihovi dokumenti za pridobitev vizuma pa so vezani na dokumente staršev, kot določa člen 5(4) Uredbe VIS.
For the second VIS objective, the prevention of visa shopping, younger age limits are also unnecessary since usually young children travel with their parents with whose application files their own are linked according to Article 5(4) of the VIS Regulation.
Za tretji cilj – olajšanje boja proti goljufijam – na splošno velja, da bi biometrični podatki lahko otežili ponarejanje vizumov.
For the third objective, the facilitation of the fight against fraud, it is generally considered that biometrics could make visas more difficult to forge.
Vendar pa ni na voljo podatkov, ali obstaja tudi težava s ponarejenimi vizumi otrok.
There is, however, no information available whether there is a problem of forged visas of children.
Kar zadeva četrti cilj – olajšanje nadzora na mejah – bi biometrični podatki omogočili, da se na meji preveri istovetnost navzoče osebe s tisto osebo, kateri je bil izdan vizum.
In case of the fourth objective - the facilitation of border control - biometrics would allow a check at the border as to whether the person present is the same person to whom the visa was issued.
Čeprav ne gre za izrecen cilj VIS, bi bilo teoretično to lahko pomembno pri boju proti trgovini z otroci, saj bi lahko preverjali, ali je na meji isti otrok, kot je bil tisti na konzulatu v spremstvu staršev.
Though it is not an explicit VIS objective, this could in theory be relevant to the fight against child trafficking through a check on whether the child at the border it is the same child as the one at the consulate with the parents.
Vendar vprašanje, ali gre pri "družini", ki se predstavi na konzulatu, za resnično družino, presega področje skupnih konzularnih navodil in VIS.
But the question of whether the 'family' presenting itself at the consulate is indeed a family is outside the realm of the CCI and the VIS.
Resnično pa obstaja tveganje, da bi zanašanje na zanesljivost VIS v resnici pomenilo zmanjšanje verjetnosti, da bi skupino ljudi na meji izprašali o tem, ali so družina.
There is indeed a risk that reliance on VIS certainty would actually mean a reduction in the likelihood of border questioning over whether a group constitutes a family.
Pomembno je tudi opozoriti, da Uredba VIS predvideva prehodno obdobje treh let po začetku delovanja VIS, v katerem državam članicam na meji ne bo treba preverjati prstnih odtisov (člen 16(1a)).
It is also important to recall that the VIS Regulation provides for a transitional period of three years after the start of VIS operations during which Member States do not have to check fingerprints at the border (Art. 16(1a)).
Poročevalka meni, da je nesorazmerno zahtevati prstne odtise otrok, če se teh sistematično ne preverja na meji.
The rapporteur considers it disproportionate to require fingerprints from young children while they are not systematically checked at the border.
Meni tudi, da bi bilo treba triletno obdobje uporabiti za izvedbo obširne študije o starostnih omejitvah pri jemanju prstnih odtisov, da bi lahko po koncu tega obdobja na podlagi boljše obveščenosti sprejeli odločitev o spremembi starostnih omejitev.
She believes that that this three year period should be used for an extended study on age limits for fingerprints so that at the end of the period any decision to change age limits could be made on a better-informed basis.
Za peti cilj VIS – pomoč pri identifikaciji oseb brez dokumentov – so prstni odtisi otrok enako nepotrebni, saj, kot priznava Komisija, niso primerne kakovosti, da bi jih lahko uporabili za identifikacijo.
For the fifth VIS objective, to assist in the identification of undocumented persons, fingerprints of young children are equally unnecessary since they are not of adequate quality to use for identification as the Commission acknowledges.
Za šesti cilj – poenostavitev izvajanja uredbe Dublin II
For the sixth objective, facilitating the application of the Dublin II Regulation
343/2003; glej člen 1a(f) Uredbe VIS. – se zdi jemanje prstnih odtisov otrok, mlajših od 14 let, v nasprotju z najnižjo starostjo v uredbi Eurodac , s pričujočim besedilom pa te omejitve ni mogoče spremeniti.
343/2003; see Art. 1a(f) of the VIS Reg. , taking fingerprints of children below 14 seems in contradiction with the minimum age in the Eurodac Regulation and the present text could not change that limit.
Steve Peers: „Biometrics and Visa Applications“; predstavitveni dokument, str.5.
Briefing Paper "Biometrics and Visa Applications" by Steve Peers, p.5
Nazadnje je vprašljivo tudi, ali bi lahko prstni odtisi otrok, mlajših od 14 let, prispevali k preprečevanju groženj notranji varnosti.
Finally, it is also doubtful whether the fingerprints of children below 14 would contribute to the prevention of threats to internal security.
Čeprav si je mogoče predstavljati, da so v zelo redkih primerih otroci vpleteni v teroristična dejanja ali druga resna kazniva dejanja, obstajajo pomisleki, če bi to opravičevalo jemanje prstnih odtisov tako velikemu številu otrok.
While it is imaginable in very rare cases that children are involved in terrorist acts or other serious crimes there are doubts as to whether this would justify taking fingerprints of so many children.
Poročevalka meni, da je enako pomembna zgornja starostna meja 79 let, kakršna je v US-Visit .
The rapporteur believes that an upper age limit of 79 as in US-Visit is equally important.
Zelo malo verjetno je, da osebe, starejše od 79 let, predstavljajo tveganje priseljevanja ali terorizma.
Persons over 79 are very unlikely to be an immigration or terrorism risk.
Zdi se nesorazmerno obremenjevati jih z obveznostjo, da obiščejo konzulat in morebiti večkrat čakajo v vrsti pred njim.
It seems disproportionate to burden them with the obligation to travel to a consulate and possibly queue several times outside.
Če zanje obveznost odvzema prstnih odtisov ne velja, lahko uporabijo običajne načine, kot so potovalne agencije.
Without the obligation to provide fingerprints they could use traditional methods like a travel agency.
Poleg tega se s staranjem zmanjšuje točnost prstnih odtisov.
In addition, the accuracy of fingerprints decrease as people grow older.
To pomeni, da bil lahko na konzulatu ali na meji naleteli na neupravičene težave.
This means that they might encounter unjustified problems at the consulate or at the border.
Stari ljudje tudi veliko teže oddajo prstne odtise, če so neodločni ali ne razumejo tehnologije.
It is also much more difficult for old people to give fingerprints if they are hesitant or do not understand the technology.
Poročevalka ne bi želela, da se EU pred zunanjim svetom predstavlja kot nespoštljiva do starejših oseb.
The rapporteur would not want the EU to give the image to the outside world of failing to respect older people.
II.2 Fotografije
II.2 Photographs
Komisija ne predlaga nobenih starostnih izjem za fotografije in poročevalka se s tem strinja.
The Commission does not propose any age exemption for photographs and the rapporteur agrees with this.
Odprto pa pušča vprašanje, ali naj se uporabljajo skenirane fotografije ali fotografije, posnete na konzulatu.
The Commission leaves open the question of whether scanned photographs are used or photographs taken at the consulate.
Poročevalka meni, da bi bilo treba za osebe, ki so izvzete iz jemanja prstnih odtisov, praviloma uporabljati skenirane fotografije, da jim ne bi bilo treba obiskati konzulata le zaradi fotografiranja.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that for persons exempted from fingerprinting, as a rule scanned photographs should be used to avoid them having to come to the consulate just for the taking of a photograph.
II.3 Pogostost zbiranja podatkov
II.3 Frequency of collection
Komisija predlaga, da se od prosilca zahteva osebna navzočnost pri registraciji prve vloge in da se prepiše te podatke pri vsaki naslednji vlogi v obdobju 48 mesecev.
The Commission proposes to require the applicant to appear in person for enrolment for the first application and to copy that data for any subsequent application within a period of 48 months.
Poročevalka predlaga, da se to obdobje podaljša na 59 mesecev, kar še vedno zagotavlja, da bodo podatki v VIS razpoložljivi skladno z obdobjem hrambe 5 let.
The rapporteur proposes to extend this period to 59 months which still guarantees that the data is available in the VIS in conformity with its retention period of 5 years.
To podaljšanje obdobja ne vpliva na varnost vizumskega postopka, naredi pa ga uporabniku bolj prijaznega.
This prolongation of the period does not affect the security of the visa process and increases its user-friendliness.
Poročevalka predlaga tudi predlog spremembe, ki pojasnjuje, da je treba po 59 mesecih vzeti nove biometrične podatke, saj je predlog Komisije možno razumeti tako, da oseba lahko celo življenje uporablja iste biometrične podatke, če redno (v obdobju 48 mesecev) vlaga prošnje za vizum.
The rapporteur also proposes an amendment clarifying that after 59 months new biometric data must be taken, since the Commission proposal seemed to imply that if a person regularly applies for a visa (within the period of 48 months) the same biometric data could be used for a lifetime.
Končno bi poročevalka rada poudarila, da je izbira 14 let kot starostne meje za jemanje prstnih odtisov povezana s pogostostjo zbiranja podatkov.
Lastly, the rapporteur would like to point out that the choice of 14 as the age limit for fingerprints is linked to the frequency of collection.
Če bi starostno mejo znižali, bi bilo treba prstne odtise otrok jemati pogosteje, saj se ti stalno spreminjajo.
If the age limit was lowered, than the fingerprints of children would have to be taken more often since they constantly change.
Sprejem vlog za izdajo vizuma
Reception of visa applications
III.1 Zunanje izvajanje
III.1 Outsourcing
Poročevalka se strinja s splošno zasnovo zunanjega izvajanja, v kolikor to izboljša storitev za prosilce za vizum in če to poteka v pogojih, ki zagotavljajo neoporečnost postopka izdajanja vizumov.
The rapporteur agrees with the general concept of outsourcing in so far as it improves the service for visa applicants and as long as it takes place under conditions which ensure the integrity of the visa issuing process.
Ti bistveni pogoji so, da se zunanje izvajanje uporabi resnično le v skrajni sili, da ponudnik storitev deluje v zgradbi, ki je pod diplomatsko zaščito, da so konzularni uslužbenci prisotni in natančno nadzirajo osebje ponudnika storitev ter da se okrepi pogodbene klavzule, ki predvidevajo nadzor izvajalca.
These essential conditions are that outsourcing is indeed only used as a last resort that the service provider operates in a building under diplomatic protection, that consular officials are present to closely supervise the staff of the service provider and that the contractual clauses providing for the oversight of the contractor are reinforced.
III.2 Skupni prijavni centri
III.2 Common Application Centres (CACs)
Poročevalka meni, da bi morali biti skupni prijavni centri – enako kot zunanje izvajanje – nameščeni v poslopjih pod diplomatsko zaščito.
As in the cases of outsourcing the rapporteur is of the opinion that CACs should only be established in a building enjoying diplomatic protection.
o upravljanju premoženja II
on Asset Management II
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................18
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................18
- ob upoštevanju bele knjige o izboljšanju okvira enotnega trga za investicijske sklade ( KOM(2006)0686 ),
- having regard to the White Paper on enhancing the single market framework for investment funds ( COM(2006)0686 ),
- ob upoštevanju direktiv Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/107/ES
- having regard to Directives 2001/107/EC
UL L 41, 13.02.2002, str.
OJ L 41, 13.2.2002, p.
35. z dne 21. januarja 2002, ki spreminjata Direktivo Sveta 85/611/EGS
35. of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 January 2002, both amending Directive 85/611/EEC