natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
IA. ker med institucijami EU obstaja splošno soglasje glede večrazsežnosti, zapletenosti in dolgoročnosti demokracije, vendar Komisija in države članice pri načrtovanju in izvajanju ukrepov za podporo demokraciji niso upoštevale celotnega volilnega cikla,
IA. whereas there is widespread consensus among the EU institutions as to the multi‑dimensional, complex and long-term nature of democracy, but whereas the Commission and the Member States have not taken the full electoral cycle into account when programming and implementing measures in support of democracy,
JA. ker so v državah, v katerih poteka demokratizacija, zlasti ženske in otroci v večji nevarnosti, da zapadejo v trgovino z ljudmi, tudi za namene prostitucije,
JA. whereas in states undergoing democratisation, women and young children are particularly vulnerable to human trafficking, including for purposes of prostitution,
1. meni, da so temelji za uravnotežena strukturna partnerstva med tretjimi državami in EU možni le z demokracijami, ki temeljijo na pravni državi, tudi ob upoštevanju potreb in interesov obeh strani in zadevnega prebivalstva;
Believes that only democracies based on the rule of law can function as a foundation for balanced structural partnerships between third countries and the EU that are also in keeping with the needs and interests of both parties and their respective populations;
3. meni, da se vloga EU kot "mehke sile" v mednarodnem sistemu lahko utrdi le, če varstvo človekovih pravic pomeni resnično prednostno nalogo EU v njeni politiki do tretjih držav;
Considers that the EU’s role as a ‘soft power’ in the international system can only be consolidated if protection of human rights constitutes a real priority for it in its policy towards third countries;
7. poudarja potrebo po paradigmi, ki bo temeljila na resničnem utrjevanju demokracije na podlagi lastnega trajnega in celovitega razvoja, ki koristi prebivalstvu in spoštuje pravno državo ter temeljne človekove pravice in svoboščine; meni, da mora EU spremljati oblikovanje okolja, ugodnega za razvoj demokratične družbe;
Highlights the need for a paradigm shift aimed at genuine consolidation of democracy on the basis of endogenous, sustainable and comprehensive development that benefits the population and respects the rule of law and basic human rights and freedoms; takes the view that the EU must encourage the establishment of an environment conducive to the development of a democratic society;
9. meni, da mora uspešen proces demokratizacije nujno obravnavati družbeni in gospodarski razvoj države, da bi se izpolnile temeljne pravice prebivalcev, kot je pravica do izobraževanja, zdravja in zaposlitve;
Considers that if a democratisation process is to be successful, it is crucial that it should address the social and economic development of the country concerned, in order to ensure that the inhabitants’ basic rights, such as the right to education, health and employment, are met;
14. poudarja pomen neprestanega spremljanja izvajanja sporazumov in glede tega poziva k izvajanju študij vpliva na človekove pravice in demokracijo, poleg študij o trajnostnem razvoju, da bi zagotovila stalno ocenjevanje sporazumov;
Emphasises the importance of constant monitoring of implementation of the agreements, and calls in this respect for the use of impact studies on human rights and democracy in addition to those on sustainable development in order to ensure continuing evaluation of the agreements;
16. obžaluje, da Komisija zelo redko uporablja mehanizme, ki omogočajo preklic preferencialov, ki so bili dodeljeni v okviru splošnega sistema preferencialov +, v primeru kršenja z njim povezanih konvencij; obsoja stališče Komisije, ki kljub skladnim poročilom mnogih mednarodnih organizacij, zavrača začetek preiskav v več državah upravičenkah do splošnega sistema preferencialov +, za katere se sumi, da ne spoštujejo konvencij, katerih podpisnice so;
Deplores the fact that the Commission only very rarely implements mechanisms providing for the withdrawal of GSP+ preferences in the event of breaches of the related agreements; condemns the attitude adopted by the Commission, which, despite mutually corroborating reports from a number of international organisations, is refusing to open investigations into several countries which enjoy GSP+ status and which are strongly suspected of not observing agreements they have signed;
19. meni, da se je treba naučiti iz preteklih izkušenj glede procesov odločanja pri izboljšanju odnosov s partnerskimi državami; poudarja, da se lahko napredni status podeli le, če se v partnerskih državah jasno upoštevajo zahteve glede človekovih pravic in demokracije; ponovno poziva k jasnemu posvetovalnemu mehanizmu, ki bo jamčil, da bo Parlament v celoti obveščen pri vseh fazah pogajanj;
Considers that lessons must be learned from the past as regards the decision-making process on upgrading relations with partner countries; stresses that advanced status must only be granted if clear human rights and democracy requirements are met by partner countries; calls once again for a clear consultation mechanism which guarantees that Parliament will be kept fully informed at all levels of the negotiations;
21. ponovno potrjuje neprestano podporo EU delu visokega komisarja ZN za človekove pravice, Agencije ZN za ženske in Unicefa; odločno poziva Svet, Komisijo in države članice, naj tesno sodelujejo s svetom za človekove pravice;
Reaffirms the continuous support of the EU for the work of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN Women and UNICEF; urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to collaborate closely with the Human Rights Council;
23. ugotavlja, da evropska pomoč, ki se kot proračunska podpora steka v avtoritarne države, ne zagotavlja vedno demokratičnega razvoja ter da se moramo pri oceni učinkovitosti pomoči osredotočiti na rezultate in ne na vložek;
Notes that European aid channelled as budget support to authoritarian states does not always guarantee democratic development and that it is the outputs of aid, rather than the inputs, on which our assessment of aid effectiveness should focus;
26. vendar poudarja, da ta pristop skupaj s prihodnjo revidirano evropsko sosedsko politiko pomeni, da je lahko raznolik pristop dragocen in verodostojen instrument le, če od vseh partnerskih držav evropske sosedske politike zahteva enake cilje na področju človekovih pravic; poudarja, da bi EU ponovno zgubila svojo verodostojnost, če bi razlikovala med minimalnimi standardi, ki jih morajo spoštovati najbolj problematične države, in bolj velikopoteznimi standardi za najbolj napredne države;
Stresses, however, that this approach, together with the upcoming revised European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), implies that the differentiated approach can only be a valuable and credible instrument if it requires the same human rights and democracy objectives for all ENP partner countries; stresses that the EU would lose its credibility once again by making a difference between ‘minimum standards’ to be respected by the most difficult countries and more ambitious standards for the most advanced countries;
28. poziva EU in države članice, naj po potrebi izvajajo pritisk na vlade držav, ki so poznane po svojem slabem spoštovanju človekovih pravic, da bi izboljšale razmere glede njihovega spoštovanja v teh državah in tako pospešile proces demokratizacije;
Calls on the EU and Member States, whenever necessary, to put pressure on the governments of states known for their bad human rights track records, in order to improve the human rights situation in these states and thus accelerate the process of democratisation;
Poglobljena politična razsežnost
Further developing the political dimension
32. zahteva izboljšave pri integraciji človekovih pravic, demokracije, demokratičnega upravljanja in načel pravne države v vse zunanje odnose EU v skladu s sedanjimi in novimi obveznostmi, tako z institucionalnega vidika kot v politiki in zemljepisnih/tematskih instrumentih;
Calls for improvements in the mainstreaming of human rights, democracy, democratic governance and the rule of law in all EU external relations activities, in line with existing and new commitments, both from an institutional perspective and in policy and geographical/thematic instruments;
39. nemudoma poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo sistematično ocenjevanje in vrednotenje politike o enakosti spolov ter spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, zlasti v zvezi s finančno podporo, ki jo daje EU;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that gender equality policy is systematically assessed and evaluated and that human rights and fundamental freedoms are respected, especially in connection with financial assistance given by the EU;
42. poudarja pomen vključevanja politik za demokratizacijo v vsa področja delovanja Evropskega parlamenta in njegovih delegacij; priznava tudi pomen globalnega medparlamentarnega sodelovanja glede politik za demokratizacijo s pomočjo forumov, kot je Parlamentarci za globalno ukrepanje;
Underlines the importance of mainstreaming democratisation policies in all the European Parliament’s work as well as in that of its delegations; also recognises the importance of global interparliamentary cooperation on democratisation policies through fora such as Parliamentarians for Global Action;
45. meni, da je bistveno, da v prihodnje civilna družba neposredno prispeva k procesu dobrega upravljanja in s tem k nadzoru nad izvajanjem sporazumov; v zvezi s tem odločno poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj vzpostavita strukturiran mehanizem za spremljanje mednarodnih sporazumov EU, ki bo vključeval vse elemente civilne družbe tretjih držav, vključno z nedržavnimi akterji in socialnimi partnerji, pri procesu ocenjevanja izvajanja sporazumov;
Considers it essential that, in future, civil society directly contribute to the processes of good governance and thus to supervising the implementation of agreements; urges, in this connection, the Commission and the Council to set up a structured monitoring mechanism of the EU’s international agreements which involves all components of third countries’ civil society, including non-state actors and social partners, in the process of evaluating the implementation of agreements;
48. poudarja, da je enakopravna udeležba žensk in moških na vseh področjih življenja bistven element demokracije in da sodelovanje žensk pri razvoju predstavlja temeljno in univerzalno sprejeto vrednoto ter predpogoj za družbeno-gospodarski razvoj in dobro demokratično vodenje;
Highlights the fact that equal participation by women and men in all spheres of life is a crucial element of democracy and that women’s participation in development constitutes a fundamental and universally accepted value and precondition for socio-economic development and good democratic governance;
63. poudarja pomen procesa politične podpore, ki se ne osredotoča le na obdobje neposredno pred volitvami in po njih, ampak temelji na nadaljevanju; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja dragoceno delo, ki ga opravljajo politične fundacije;
Stresses the importance of a political support process which does not simply focus on the period immediately before and after elections, but is based on continuity; in this connection, applauds the valuable work carried out by political foundations;
Podpora civilni družbi
Supporting civil society
67. predlaga oblikovanje bolj odprte in dejavnejše politike za podpiranje civilne družbe, ki bo spodbujala demokratizacijo in udeležbo državljanov; predlaga spodbujanje vpliva takšnih gibanj in posameznikov s posebnimi programi in z vključevanjem tega koncepta v obstoječe programe;
Proposes that a more open and active policy of supporting civil society be developed, which encourages democratisation and civic participation; suggests that the influence of such movements and individuals be fostered through specific programmes and by incorporating this concept into existing programmes;
71. podpira uveljavljeno prakso iskanja inovativnih načinov za vključitev civilne družbe, političnih strank, medijev in drugih nevladnih političnih akterjev v dialoge med EU in tretjimi državami;
Supports the established practice of looking for innovative ways to involve civil society, political parties, the media and other non-governmental political players in the EU’s dialogues with third countries;
73. poudarja, da je dostop do informacij in neodvisnih medijev ključen za spodbujanje javnih pozivov k demokratičnim reformam, zato poziva k večji podpori na področju spodbujanja svobode "starih"in "novih" medijev, zaščite neodvisnih novinarjev, zmanjšanja digitalne vrzeli in omogočanja dostopa do interneta;
Underlines the fact that access to information and independent media is crucial to fostering public demand for democratic reforms, and therefore calls for increased support in the areas of promoting the freedom of ‘old’ and ‘new’ media, protecting independent journalists, reducing the digital divide and facilitating internet access;
76. priznava pomen sodelovanja med EU in Svetom Evrope glede demokratizacije po svetu; pozdravlja začetek skupnih programov EU in Sveta Evrope v podporo demokraciji, dobremu upravljanju in stabilnosti v državah vzhodnega partnerstva;
Recognises the importance of cooperation between the EU and the Council of Europe on democratisation around the world; welcomes the commencement of joint EU and Council of Europe programmes in support of democracy, good governance and stability in Eastern Partnership countries;
Pripravljavec mnenja: Alf Svensson
Rapporteur: Alf Svensson
6. ugotavlja, da evropska pomoč, ki se kot proračunska podpora steka v avtoritarne države, ne zagotavlja zmeraj demokratičnega razvoja ter da se moramo pri oceni učinkovitosti pomoči osredotočiti na rezultate in ne na vložek;
Notes that European aid channelled as budget support to authoritarian states does not always guarantee democratic development and that it is the outputs of aid, rather than the inputs, that our assessment of aid effectiveness should focus on;
9. meni, da sta neodvisna pravosodni in medijski sistem bistvena za oblikovanje in izvajanje demokratičnega procesa, ki je namenjen krepitvi pravne države, gradnji demokratičnih institucij, vključno z delujočim parlamentom, ki uresničuje politični pluralizem, ter krepitvi vloge civilne družbe;
Considers that an independent judiciary and independent media are essential to shaping and regulating the democratic process with the aim of strengthening the rule of law, building democratic institutions (including a functioning parliament), making political pluralism a reality and strengthening the role of civil society;
11. priznava pomembno vlogo žensk pri demokratizaciji, zlasti v zadnjem času; poziva države članice in EU, naj v sodelovanju s širšo mednarodno skupnostjo podprejo ženske pri njihovem boju za enake pravice, enakost spolov in krepitev njihove moči;
Recognises the important role played by women in democratisation, particularly in recent times; calls on the Member States and the EU, in cooperation with the wider international community, to support women in their struggle for equal rights, gender equality and empowerment;
14. poudarja, kako pomembna je priprava analize lokalnih razmer na področju človekovih pravic, ki mora biti temelj za vsa razvojna posredovanja; poziva Komisijo, naj del o razmerah na področju demokracije in človekovih pravicah vključi v vse strateške dokumente za države in regije ter priskrbi podrobnejše podatke o vplivu pobud za podporo demokracije;
Stresses the importance of drawing up an analysis of the local human rights situation, which should form the basis for all development interventions; calls on the Commission to include a section on the state of democracy and human rights in all Country and Regional Strategy Papers, and to provide more detailed data on the impact of democracy-support initiatives;
1. poudarja, da je enakopravna udeležba žensk in moških na vseh področjih življenja bistven element demokracije in da sodelovanje žensk pri razvoju predstavlja temeljno in univerzalno sprejeto vrednoto ter predpogoj za družbeno-gospodarski razvoj in dobro demokratično vodenje;
Highlights the fact that equal participation by women and men in all spheres of life is a crucial element of democracy and that women’s participation in development constitutes a fundamental and universally accepted value and precondition for socio-economic development and good democratic governance;
Poziva Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj dejavno spodbuja enako zastopanost žensk in moških v institucijah držav po spopadih.
Calls on the European External Action Service to actively promote equal representation of women and men in post-conflict state institutions.
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Edite Estrela, Ilda Figueiredo, Iratxe García Pérez, Zita Gurmai, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Constance Le Grip, Barbara Matera, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Eva-Britt Svensson, Britta Thomsen, Marina Yannakoudakis, Anna Záborská
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Tadeusz Cymański, Edite Estrela, Ilda Figueiredo, Iratxe García Pérez, Zita Gurmai, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Constance Le Grip, Barbara Matera, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Antonyia Parvanova, Eva-Britt Svensson, Britta Thomsen, Marina Yannakoudakis, Anna Záborská
Gabriele Albertini, Pino Arlacchi, Bastiaan Belder, Elmar Brok, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Heidi Hautala, Richard Howitt, Jelko Kacin, Othmar Karas, Ioanis Kasulidis (Ioannis Kasoulides), Tunne Kelam, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Eduard Kukan, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Barry Madlener, Mario Mauro, Kiriakos Mavronikolas (Kyriakos Mavronikolas), Francisco José Millán Mon, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Hannes Swoboda, Inese Vaidere, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala
Gabriele Albertini, Pino Arlacchi, Bastiaan Belder, Elmar Brok, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Heidi Hautala, Richard Howitt, Jelko Kacin, Othmar Karas, Ioannis Kasoulides, Tunne Kelam, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Eduard Kukan, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Barry Madlener, Mario Mauro, Kyriakos Mavronikolas, Francisco José Millán Mon, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Hannes Swoboda, Inese Vaidere, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala
o dejavnostih Odbora za peticije v letu 2010
on the activities of the Committee on Petitions in 2010
– ob upoštevanju členov 24, 227, 258 in 260 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 24, 227, 258 and 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju členov 10 in 11 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Articles 10 and 11 of the Treaty on European Union,
– ob upoštevanju členov 48 in 202(8) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 48 and 202(8) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A7–0232/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0232/2011 ),
A. ker priznava pomen postopka vlaganja peticij in njegove posebne značilnosti, ki bi morale pristojnemu odboru omogočati, da poišče rešitve za državljane EU, ki Parlamentu predložijo peticijo, ter jih zagovarja,
A. bearing in mind the importance of the petitions process and its specific attributes, which should enable the committee responsible to seek and provide solutions and to defend EU citizens who petition Parliament,
B. ker je treba zagotoviti večjo udeležbo državljanov v postopkih odločanja v Evropski uniji, da se okrepita njena legitimnost in odgovornost,
B. whereas it is necessary to increase citizen participation in the EU decision-making process, with a view to reinforcing its legitimacy and accountability,
C. ker Parlament neposredno zastopa državljane Evropske unije, ki jim njihova pravica do vložitve peticije omogoča, da se obrnejo na svoje predstavnike, kadar menijo, da so bile njihove pravice kršene in da je za njihovo pritožbo pristojna Evropska unija,
C. whereas citizens of the EU are directly represented by Parliament, and the right of petition offers them the means to address their representatives if they consider that their rights have been infringed and if the subject of their petition comes within the field of activity of the European Union,
D. ker ima izvrševanje evropske zakonodaje neposredne posledice za državljane in prebivalce EU in ker lahko prav ti najbolje ocenijo njeno učinkovitost in pomanjkljivosti, pa tudi opozorijo na vrzeli, ki jih je treba zapolniti, da se zagotovi čim boljša uporaba zakonodaje Unije v posameznih državah članicah, in ker mora Odbor za peticije postati prednostni sogovornik,
D. whereas the implementation of European legislation has a direct impact on EU citizens and residents, who are the best placed to assess its effectiveness and its shortcomings and to signal remaining loopholes that need to be closed to ensure better implementation of EU legislation by the Member States, and whereas the Committee on Petitions should become a priority contact,
E. ker ima prek Odbora za peticije dolžnost raziskati ta vprašanja in poiskati čim boljše rešitve za državljane in ker v ta namen vse tesneje sodeluje s Komisijo, evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic, drugimi parlamentarnimi odbori in organi, agencijami in evropskimi omrežji ter z državami članicami,
E. whereas Parliament, through its Committee on Petitions, is obliged to investigate such issues and offer citizens the most appropriate remedies, and is therefore stepping up cooperation with the Commission, the European Ombudsman, other parliamentary committees, European bodies, agencies and networks and Member States,
F. ker države članice kljub temu v določenih primerih še vedno niso pripravljene dejavno sodelovati s pristojnim odborom in se na primer ne udeležujejo njegovih sej in ne odgovarjajo na prejeto pošto, kar je dokaz nelojalnosti v sodelovanju z institucijo,
F. whereas, however, in some cases Member States remain reluctant to cooperate actively with the responsible committee, and fail, for example, to attend meetings of the committee or to reply to letters sent to them; whereas this denotes a failure to cooperate with the institution in good faith,
G. ker vseeno priznava, da mnoge države članice z njim dobro sodelujejo in si prizadevajo odgovoriti na skrbi državljanov, ki jih ti izražajo z vlaganjem peticij,
G. recognising, however, that many Member States demonstrate a good level of cooperation and work with Parliament in an effort to respond to the concerns of citizens as expressed through the petitions process,
H. ker priznava prispevek služb Komisije k postopku obravnavanja peticij, saj zagotavljajo predhodne ocene številnih prejetih peticij,
H. recognising the contribution made to the petitions process by the services of the Commission, which provide preliminary assessments of many petitions received,
I. ker je treba zaradi specializiranosti peticij in raznolikosti tem, na katere se nanašajo, tesneje sodelovati z drugimi parlamentarnimi odbori, da jih bo mogoče zaprositi za mnenja, nujno potrebna za ustrezno obravnavo peticij,
I. whereas the degree of specialisation of petitions and the wide variety of issues addressed necessitates closer cooperation with the other parliamentary committees, so that their opinions – which are indispensible in dealing with petitions properly – may be requested,
J. ker se je število peticij, ki jih je Parlament prejel leta 2010, v primerjavi z letom 2009 nekoliko zmanjšalo (1655 v primerjavi s 1924, kar je za 14 % manj),
J. whereas the number of petitions received by Parliament in 2010 was slightly lower than that recorded in 2009 (i.e. 1 655 as compared with 1 924 – a drop of 14 %),