natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
57. ugotavlja, da bo lizbonska pogodba imela tudi finančni vpliv, sicer omejen, zaradi novih posebnih pristojnosti, ki jih je pridobila Unija; navaja, da je pripravljen analizirati, ko bo za to čas, dejanske posledice izvajanja teh novih pristojnosti; meni, da se teh pristojnosti zagotovo ne bo izvajalo naenkrat in ne takoj po začetku veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe, temveč postopoma, ko bodo pripravljeni zadevni zakonodajni predlogi; vendar meni, da se njihovo financiranje ne sme izvajati na škodo financiranja aktualnih dejavnosti Unije;
Notes that the Lisbon Treaty will also have a financial impact, however limited, by virtue of the new specific competences conferred on the Union; states its willingness to analyse, at the appropriate juncture, the practical implications of the exercise of these new competences; takes the view that these competences will certainly not be implemented en bloc immediately after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, but rather gradually as the relevant legislative proposals are drawn up; takes the view, however, that they must not be funded to the detriment of the Union’s current activities;
59. ugotavlja, da bi letna objava nacionalnih in morebitnih regionalnih proračunskih sredstev vsake od držav članic, ki prispevajo k uresničitvi glavnih ciljev Unije, prispevala koristno pojasnilo za odločitev o razporeditvi odhodkov iz proračuna Unije v zvezi s temi cilji;
Points out that the decision on the apportionment of EU budget expenditure in the light of the EU’s major objectives would be usefully informed by the annual publication, by each Member State, of the appropriations under national and, where applicable, regional budgets that contribute to achieving those objectives;
Lizbonska pogodba uvaja temeljite spremembe v zvezi s financami Unije, zlasti kar zadeva medinstitucionalne odnose in postopke odločanja.
The Treaty of Lisbon makes sweeping changes in the area of the Union’s finances, particularly as regards interinstitutional relations and decision-making procedures.
Vzporedno vzpostavlja jasno hierarhijo med temeljnimi akti finančnega in proračunskega življenja v Uniji, pri čemer si prizadeva za potrebno pojasnitev sistema sprejemanja odločitev.
At the same time, the Treaty establishes a precise hierarchy between the basic acts of the financial and budgetary life of the Union, with the aim of bringing necessary clarification to the decision-making system.
Načelo, ki izhaja iz določb lizbonske pogodbe, je sestavljeno iz štirih glavnih osi:
The principle that derives from the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon is related to four main axes:
– države članice ostajajo temeljne nosilke prihodka proračuna prek lastnih sredstev Unije,
- The Member States basically remain in charge of budget revenue through the Union’s own resources.
– Svet in Evropski parlament se morata nujno, v okviru lastnih sredstev, sporazumeti o načrtovanju odhodkov, ki postanejo pravno zavezujoči,
- The Council and the EP must agree, within the limits of own resources, on the programming of expenditure, which becomes legally binding.
– razlikovanje med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki se odpravi: proračun morata v večletnem finančnem okviru v celoti sprejeti Evropski parlament in Svet.
- The distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure is abolished: the budget as a whole must be adopted jointly by the EP and the Council, in compliance with the multiannual financial framework.
Poleg tega se pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta v postopku sprejetja proračuna okrepijo: noben letni proračun se ne more sprejeti brez soglasja Evropskega parlamenta, tako da lahko ta izsili sprejetje proračuna proti volji Sveta,
In addition, the EP’s powers in the budget adoption procedure are strengthened: no annual budget may be adopted without the EP’s agreement, whereas the EP may force the adoption of a budget against the Council’s wishes.
– odgovornost Parlamenta se poveča na področju proračunske discipline.
- Parliament’s responsibility in the area of budget discipline is increased.
Glede na določbe lizbonske pogodbe bosta finančno uredbo morala sprejeti Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku (člen 279 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije), tj. po postopku soodločanja.
Under the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon (TL), the financial regulation must be adopted by the EP and the Council under the ordinary legislative procedure (Article 279 TFEU), i.e. codecision.
Poročevalka predlaga, da se raziščejo spremembe, ki jih bo povzročilo sprejetje lizbonske pogodbe v zvezi s proračunskim postopkom in pristojnostmi Parlamenta v zvezi s tem.
The rapporteur will explore the changes that would result from adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon as regards the budget procedure and the relevant powers of Parliament.
4. glavne obravnavane teme so povezovanje prihodnjega finančnega okvira in finančne uredbe, kar zadeva določbe, ki so trenutno predvidene v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu; posledice institucionalnih sprememb in novih pristojnosti Unije na proračun.
The main issues covered will be the links between the future financial framework and the Financial Regulation as regards the measures currently provided for in the IIA, the budgetary implications of the institutional changes, and the Union’s new competences.
II – Financiranje Unije (člen 269 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije)
II - Financing of the Union (Article 269 TFEU)
Pogodba ni spremenila pristopa financiranja Unije.
The Treaty has not altered the logic of how the Union is financed.
Temeljna odločitev sistema evropskih sredstev se ohrani v njegovi pristojnosti na ravni držav članic: gre za soglasno sprejet sklep Sveta, ki začne veljati po odobritvi vseh držav članic in glede na njihova ustavna pravila.
The fundamental decision on the system of European resources remains, as before, a matter for the Member States: a decision adopted unanimously by the Council, which does not enter into force until it is approved by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.
Čeprav daje pobudo Komisija, Parlament pa sodeluje pri postopku s predložitvijo svojega mnenja, se ta pristojnost zopet vrne predvsem k državam članicam.
Although the Commission has the initiative and the EP takes part in the process by delivering its opinion, this power essentially rests with the Member States.
Načelo zadostnosti sredstev se je ohranilo, kot je navedeno v veljavnih pogodbah: "Unija si zagotovi sredstva, potrebna za doseganje svojih ciljev in izvajanje svojih politik" (člen 269, prva alineja Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije).
The principle of sufficient resources remains in the same form as it appears in the current Treaties: ‘ The Union shall provide itself with the means necessary to attain its objectives and carry through its policies ’ (first paragraph of Article 269 TFEU).
Tukaj je potrjeno temeljno načelo proračunske discipline, katerega namen je, da "Unija ne sprejme nobenega akta, ki bi utegnil imeti znaten vpliv na proračun, ne da bi zagotovila, da se s tem aktom povezani odhodki lahko financirajo v mejah lastnih sredstev Unije in ob upoštevanju večletnega finančnega okvira po členu 270a" .
Furthermore, this is confirmed by the fundamental principle of budgetary discipline, whereby ‘ the Union shall not adopt any act which is likely to have appreciable implications for the budget without providing an assurance that the expenditure arising from such an act is capable of being financed within the limit of the Union ’ s own resources and in compliance with the multiannual financial framework referred to in Article 270a ’.
Lizbonska pogodba je tako pojasnila nekatere vidike in uvedla začetek "prenosa sistema na raven Skupnosti".
Nevertheless, the TL has at the same time clarified certain aspects and sets in motion the ‘Communitisation’ of the system.
Dejansko prinaša nov element v vsebino sklepa o lastnih sredstvih, pri čemer predvideva možnost, da "lahko uvede tudi nove kategorije lastnih sredstev ali odpravi obstoječe" .
It introduces a new element to the substance of the decision on own resources, making it possible to ‘ establish new categories of own resources or abolish an existing category ’.
Kljub temu je to le potrditev že veljavnega dejstva: tega ne ureja pogodba, temveč se vrste lastnih sredstev, s katerimi razpolaga Unija, določajo s sklepom o lastnih sredstvih.
However, this simply confirms the current reality: as the Treaty does not operate at this level, it is the own-resources decision that establishes the types of own resources available to the Union.
Enako velja za znesek sredstev, kar seveda vključuje možnost njihove spremembe, črtanja ali oblikovanja novih.
The same applies to the amount of such resources, which naturally includes the possibility of amending or abolishing them or creating new ones.
Poročevalka meni, da to sčasoma odpira novo pot za napredek proti sistemu lastnih sredstev, ki je v očeh državljana pravičnejši, preglednejši in vidnejši.
In the rapporteur’s view, this opens the way in future to moving towards a system of own resources that is fairer, more transparent and more visible to the public.
Nova alineja, dodana k členu 269 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, predvideva, da se ukrepi za izvajanje sistema lastnih sredstev sprejmejo z uredbo Sveta, sprejeto s kvalificirano večino in odobritvijo Evropskega parlamenta.
Under a new paragraph added to Article 269 TFEU, measures implementing the own‑resources system will be adopted by a Council regulation adopted by a qualified majority and with the consent of the EP.
Ta določba, kljub omejitvi, po kateri se sprejmejo ukrepi za izvajanje pod pogoji iz sklepa o lastnih sredstvih, odpira novo pot proti večji vlogi Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi z lastnimi sredstvi.
Despite the restriction that the implementing measures are taken within the limits provided for by the own-resources decision, this provision opens the way to a greater role for the EP as regards own resources.
Če želimo na koncu v inovacijah, ki jih prinaša pogodba, zaznati pozitiven razvoj, lahko obžalujemo neizkoriščeno priložnost za bistveno napredovanje, tj. preoblikovanje sistema v prava lastna sredstva Unije, ki bi v postopku ponudila pristno sodelovanje institucijam Unije, Evropskemu parlamentu pa dodelila odločilnejšo vlogo.
In conclusion, while the Treaty takes some steps in the right direction, it is regrettable that the opportunity was missed to make substantial progress, for example by transforming the system into genuine Union own resources, which would allow for genuine participation by the Union’s institutions in the procedure and would give the European Parliament a more influential role.
III – Večletni finančni okvir
III - The multiannual financial framework
Kot je Parlament v preteklosti to večkrat zahteval, se lizbonska pogodba posveča načelu, po katerem bi bil večletni finančni načrt pravno zavezujoči akt
The TL, as Parliament has called for on numerous occasions, lays down the principle that the multiannual financial framework is legally binding
Po mnenju držav članic je bila pravno zavezujoča ureditev potreben prispevek za odpravo razlikovanja med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki, saj je več držav članic menilo, da mora biti razširitev proračunskih pristojnosti EP na vse izdatke Unije določena s strogo proračunsko disciplino.
For the Member States, this legally binding formalisation was the necessary counterbalance to the abolition of the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure, as several Member States felt that extending the EP’s budgetary powers to the Union’s expenditure as a whole should be subject to rigorous budgetary discipline.
Evropski parlament je že več let podpiral ukrep za jasnejšo in preglednejšo proračunsko disciplino, pri čemer se je zavedal ključne vloge, ki jo je ta imela pri pomiritvi nekdanjega proračunskega spora med Svetom in Parlamentom, ter je omogočila uravnotežen in načrtovan razvoj svoje politike. , ki bi temeljil na oblikovanju posebne pravne podlage za sprejetje uredbe, ki vsebuje ta okvir.
The EP had for years been in favour of an approach aimed at making budgetary discipline clearer and more transparent, aware of the essential role that this had played in ending the former budgetary conflict between Council and Parliament, thereby allowing the Union to develop its policies in a balanced and planned way. , which is founded on the establishment of a specific legal base for the adoption of the regulation containing this framework.
Svet mora sprejeti to uredbo po posebnem zakonodajnem postopku, v katerem ima Evropski parlament moč odločanja.
This regulation must be adopted by the Council through a special legislative procedure in which the EP has power to decide.
Člen 270a v odstavku 1 dodeljuje večletnemu finančnemu okviru funkcijo "zagotovi[tve], da se odhodki Unije v okviru njenih lastnih sredstev izvršujejo na urejen način" .
The first subparagraph of Article 270a(1) stipulates that the multiannual financial framework must ‘ ensure that Union expenditure develops in an orderly manner and within the limits of its own resources ’.
V zadnji alineji dodaja, da mora biti "letni proračun Unije [...] pripravljen v skladu z večletnim finančnim okvirom" .
The last subparagraph adds that the ‘ annual budget of the Union shall comply with the multiannual financial framework ’.
Ta alineja, ki dopolnjuje načelo iz člena 269(4) ( "Unija ne sprejme nobenega akta, ki bi utegnil imeti znaten vpliv na proračun, ne da bi zagotovila, da se s tem aktom povezani odhodki lahko financirajo v mejah lastnih sredstev Unije in ob upoštevanju večletnega finančnega okvira iz člena 270a " ), pripravlja podlago za proračunsko disciplino Unije
This paragraph, which complements the principle laid down in Article 269(4) (‘ the Union shall not adopt any act which is likely to have appreciable implications for the budget without providing an assurance that the expenditure arising from such an act is capable of being financed within the limit of the Union ’ s own resources and in compliance with the multiannual financial framework referred to in Article 270a ’), lays the foundations for the Union’s budgetary discipline
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da se načelo iz člena 269(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije v veliki meri prekriva s členom 270 veljavne Pogodbe o ES, vendar z bistveno razliko (z dodatkom v mejah večletnega finančnega okvira), in da se je ta nanašal le na Komisijo, medtem ko se novi člen nanaša na celotno Unijo, torej na vse njene institucije.
It is worth noting that the principle laid down in Article 269(4) TFEU to a large degree corresponds to Article 270 of the current EC Treaty, with the significant difference (as well as the addition of the limit of the multiannual financial framework) that the latter referred only to the Commission while the new article refers to the Union as whole, i.e. to all its institutions.
To pomeni, da lizbonska pogodba obravnava proračunsko disciplino kot pravno obveznost za vse institucije, ki jo bodo torej morale popolnoma izvajati, vsaka na svojem specifičnem področju pristojnosti. .
This means that the TL considers budgetary discipline to be a legal obligation for all institutions and that each of them will have to implement it fully in its specific area of responsibility. .
Vsebina večletnega finančnega okvira
Content of the MFF
Pogodba institucionalizira sedanjo prakso.
The Treaty institutionalises current practice.
Člen 270a določa, da mora večletni finančni okvir " določiti letne zgornje meje glede odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za obveznosti po vrstah odhodkov in letne zgornje meje odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za plačila ".
Article 270a stipulates that the MFF must ‘ determine the amounts of the annual ceilings on commitment appropriations by category of expenditure and of the annual ceiling on payment appropriations. ’
Vendar lizbonska pogodba določa, da " finančni okvir opredeli vse druge določbe, potrebne za nemoten potek letnega proračunskega postopka " (odstavek 3, prva alineja).
It also states that ‘ The financial framework shall lay down any other provisions required for the annual budget procedure to run smoothly ’ (second subparagraph of paragraph 3).
To pomeni, da večletni finančni okvir zajema del vsebine dveh delov veljavnega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o finančni disciplini
This means that the MFF includes some of the substance of both parts of the current interinstitutional agreement on financial discipline
Cilj medinstitucionalnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (UL C 139, 14.6.2006) je izvajanje proračunske discipline.
The objective of the interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (OJ C 139, 14.06.2006) is to put budgetary discipline into practice.
Vključuje vse institucije in se nanaša na vse odhodke, ki jih zajema večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013.
It applies to all institutions and to all expenditure covered by the 2007-2013 multiannual financial framework.
Njegov cilj je izboljšanje poteka letnega proračunskega postopka in medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja na področju proračuna ter omogoča zagotovitev dobrega finančnega poslovodenja. in ne le navedbo o zgornjih mejah odhodkov.
It aims to improve the running of the annual budget procedure and interinstitutional cooperation in the area of the budget and contributes towards ensuring sound financial management. and not only the indication of the expenditure ceilings.
Ta posebni vidik bo obravnavan v poglavju VI.
This particular aspect will be dealt with in Chapter VI.
Večletni finančni okvir je uredba, sprejeta s posebnim zakonodajnim postopkom, za katerega je po odobritvi Evropskega parlamenta potrebno soglasno sprejetje Sveta.
The multiannual financial framework is a regulation adopted by a special legislative procedure which requires that it be adopted unanimously by the Council with the consent of the EP.
Evropski parlament ima torej moč odločanja.
The EP therefore has power to decide.
Treba je opozoriti, da gre za formalizacijo praks medinstitucionalnih sporazumov iz zadnjih let.
This serves to formalise the practice of interinstitutional agreements of recent years.
Poleg tega člen 270a(5) vztraja pri dejstvu, da " Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija uvedejo v postopku sprejemanja finančnega okvira vse ukrepe, potrebne za uspešen zaključek postopka ".
In addition, Article 270(5) stipulates that ‘ Throughout the procedure leading to the adoption of the financial framework, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall take any measure necessary to facilitate its adoption ’.
Cilj te določbe je ločevanje proračunskega postopka od postopka soodločanja in omilitev poteka postopka privolitve.
This provision is intended to differentiate the budget procedure from codecision and to temper the logic of an assent-type procedure.
Začasna rešitev za odpravljanje morebitnih neuspešnih pogajanj
A provisional solution to possible failure of negotiations
Člen 270a(4) odraža možnost pojavljanja težav med pogajanji o vsaki finančni perspektivi in predvideva možnost neuspešnega sporazuma, tj. neuspeha, ki je toliko bolj verjeten, ker se je pravilo soglasnosti v Svetu ohranilo, čeprav je v pogodbi navedena možnost prehoda na kvalificirano večino.
Article 270a(4) reflects the fact that difficulties may arise during the negotiations on each financial perspective and makes provision for the possibility of a failure to reach agreement, which is all the more likely given that the rule of unanimity in the Council has been maintained, although the possibility of moving to a qualified majority is included in the Treaty.
V tem primeru predvideva, da , če se novi večletni finančni okvir " ne sprejme do izteka predhodnega finančnega okvira [...], se zgornje meje in druge določbe, ki ustrezajo zadnjemu letu tega okvira, podaljšajo do sprejetja omenjenega akta ".
If no new financial framework ‘ has been adopted by the end of the previous financial framework, the ceilings and other provisions corresponding to the last year of that framework shall be extended until such time as that act is adopted ’.
Trajanje večletnega finančnega okvira
Duration of the MFF
Lizbonska pogodba predvideva, da večletni finančni okvir traja najmanj pet let.
Under the TL, the multiannual financial framework lasts a minimum of five years.
Cilj tega je čim boljše ujemanje trajanja večletnega finančnega okvira z mandatom Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije, kot to že dolgo zahteva Evropski parlament.
The intention is to make the duration of the MFF coincide as far as possible with the terms of office of the EP and of the Commission, as the EP has long called for.
Sklenitev vsakega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o finančnih perspektivah bi morala predstavljati priložnost za zagon zakonodajnega programa, ki dejansko ustreza političnemu in finančnemu programu.
The conclusion of each interinstitutional agreement on the financial perspective should be the occasion to launch a legislative programme that corresponds in reality to a political and financial programme.
Ta bi moral torej po logiki biti vezan na demokratični mandat izvoljenega Parlamenta in Komisije, ki je pred njim politično odgovorna
The latter should therefore logically be attached to the democratic mandate of the elected Parliament and of a Commission politically responsible to it
V Resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih razširjene Unije 2007–2013 ( 2004/2209(INI) ) Parlament "zaradi demokratične odgovornosti ponovno poudarja svojo podporo vzporednosti med trajanjem finančne perspektive ter petletnima mandatoma Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije" .
In its resolution on policy challenges and budgetary means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 ( 2004/2209(INI) ), Parliament ‘ reiterates, for reasons of democratic responsibility and accountability, its position in favour of a parallelism between the duration of the Financial Perspective and the five-year mandates of the European Parliament and of the Commission ’. .
Praksa okvira finančnih perspektiv je nekaterim zakonodajnim obdobjem Evropskega parlamenta lahko dala povod za "dedovanje" finančnega okvira, na katerega ta niso imela nobenega vpliva
Practice relating to the context of financial perspectives has meant that certain parliamentary terms have ‘inherited’ financial frameworks in which they had had no say
Posledično bi lahko predvideli večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 5 let, ki bi se začel dve ali tri leta po začetku mandata EP in Komisije (5 let od N + 2 ali N + 3, pri čemer je N leto začetka opravljanja mandatov EP in Komisije).
Provision could therefore be made for a five-year MFF beginning two or even three years after the start of the EP’s and the Commission’s terms of office (five years starting from N+2 or N+3, ‘N’ being the year in which the EP’s and Commission’s terms of office begin).
Treba je omeniti, da evropske volitve potekajo junija leta N, Komisija pa začne svoj mandat oktobra/novembra, torej v praksi N+2 pomeni malo več kot leto za pogajanja, kar pa ne zadošča za sprejetje novega večletnega finančnega okvira. .
It should be noted that, since the European elections are held in June of year N and the Commission’s term of office starts in October/November, in practice N+2 means a little more than a year for the negotiations, which cannot be long enough for the adoption of a new MFF. .
Enako velja za Komisijo, ki je včasih prisiljena izvajati finančni okvir, o katerem se je pred tem pogajala prejšnja Komisija.
The same applies to the Commission, which is sometimes obliged to implement a financial framework negotiated by a previous Commission.
Torej je prisiljena sprejeti politične odločitve, ki so jih sprejele predhodne oblasti
It therefore has to take over the political choices made by the previous executive