natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog spremembe ponovno vključuje besedilo prve obravnave Parlamenta, njegov namen pa je zagotoviti pravico identificirane osebe do popravka osebnih podatkov, če so ti netočni.
This amendment reintroduces the first reading of the Parliament and aims to guarantee the right of the person identified to correct the personal data in the case where they would be inaccurate.
Države članice uporabnikom cest zagotovijo potrebne informacije o ukrepih izvajanja te direktive, in sicer v sodelovanju z organizacijami, kot so organi za varstvo v cestnem prometu, nevladne organizacije, dejavne na področju cestne varnosti, ali avtomobilski klubi.
Member States shall provide road users with the necessary information about the measures implementing this Directive in association with, among other organisations, road safety bodies, non-governmental organisations active in the field of road safety or automobile clubs.
Države članice zlasti zagotovijo, da so predpisi o omejitvah hitrosti predstavljeni na prometnih znakih povsod, kjer avtoceste prečkajo njihove meje.
In particular, Member States shall ensure that the rules on speed limits are displayed on signs erected on every motorway crossing their borders.
Na Komisijo se prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 8b o spremembi Priloge Ia, ki določa zahteve za izvajanje avtomatiziranih iskanj.
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 8b concerning the modification of Annex Ia setting out the requirements to be respected when conducting automated searches , in accordance with Article 4(1) .
Novi člen vključuje postopek delegiranega akta za spremembo priloge, ki vsebuje tehnične zahteve.
This new article inserts the procedure of delegated act for the modification of the annex containing the technical requirements.
Pooblastila iz člena 4(1) se na Komisijo prenesejo za obdobje petih let od začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 4(1) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from the date of entry into force of th is Directive.
Evropski parlament ali Svet lahko kadarkoli prekličeta pooblastilo iz člena 4(1).
The delegation of power referred to in Article 4(1) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Odločitev začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ali na dan, določen v njej.
It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein.
Odločitev ne vpliva na veljavnost delegiranih aktov, ki so že v veljavi.
It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
Delegirani akt, sprejet v skladu s členom 4(1), začne veljati le, če mu v roku dveh mesecev od uradnega sporočila o aktu Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ne nasprotujeta Evropski parlament ali Svet ali če pred iztekom omenjenega roka Evropski parlament in Svet seznanita Komisijo, da aktu ne nameravata nasprotovati.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 4(1) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
Novi člen vključuje postopek delegiranega akta za spremembo priloge, ki vsebuje tehnične zahteve, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri izmenjavi podatkov.
This new article inserts the procedure of delegated act for the modification of the annex containing the technical requirements to be respected for the exchange of data.
Komisija v šestdesetih mesecih Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o uporabi te direktive s strani držav članic , oceni, ali bi bilo treba v členu 2 dodati druge prometne prekrške, povezane z varnostjo v cestnem prometu , in po potrebi pripravi predlog.
By sixty months after the entry into force of this Directive the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive by the Member States , assess whether other road safety related traffic offences should be added to Article 2 and, if appropriate, make a proposal .
V šestintridesetih mesecih po začetku veljavnosti te direktive Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o uporabi te direktive s strani držav članic .
By thirty-six months after the entry into force of this Directive the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive by the Member States .
Komisija se v svojem poročilu osredotoči zlasti na naslednje vidike in predstavi predloge za obravnavo teh vidikov:
In its report, the Commission shall focus in particular on the following aspects and shall make proposals to cover those aspects:
– oceno, ali bi bilo treba na področje uporabe te direktive dodati druge prometne prekrške, povezane z varnostjo v cestnem prometu ;
- The assessment of whether other road safety related traffic offences should be added to the scope of th is Directive ;
– oceno učinkovitosti te direktive pri zmanjševanju števila smrtnih žrtev na cestah Unije, zlasti pa, ali geografski obseg uporabe direktive vpliva na njeno učinkovitost;
- The assessment of the effectiveness of th is Directive on the reduction in the number of fatalities on Union roads, in particular whether its effectiveness is affected by the geographical coverage of th is Directive;
– oceno, ali je treba uskladiti opremo in postopke za avtomatski nadzor.
- The assessment of the necessity to harmonise automatic checking equipment and procedures.
Komisijo se s tem v zvezi poziva, naj v okviru skupne prometne politike na ravni Unije oblikuje smernice za varnost v cestnem prometu, da bi s primerljivimi metodami in praksami zagotovili večje zbliževanje glede izvrševanja cestnoprometnih predpisov, ki ga izvajajo države članice.
In this context, the Commission is invited to develop at Union level road safety guidelines within the framework of the common transport policy in order to ensure greater convergence of the enforcement of road traffic rules by Member States through comparable methods and practices.
Smernice lahko zajemajo vsaj neupoštevanje omejitev hitrosti, vožnjo pod vplivom alkohola, neuporabo varnostnega pasu in vožnjo skozi rdečo luč.
These guidelines may cover at least the non-respect of speed limits, drink-driving, non-use of seat belts and failure to stop at a traffic red light.
Komisija upošteva usmeritve glede smernic, ki so omenjene v delu I Priloge Ib;
The Commission shall take into account the orientations for guidelines mentioned in Annex Ib Part I;
– oceno, ali je treba v okviru skupne prometne politike z usklajenimi nadaljnjimi postopki v primeru neplačanih denarnih kazni okrepiti pregon prometnih prekrškov, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu.
- The assessment of the need to strengthen the enforcement of road safety related traffic offences through their harmonised follow-up procedures in the case of non-payment of a financial penalty, within the framework of the common transport policy.
Komisija upošteva merila, navedena v delu II Priloge Ib;
The Commission shall take into account the criteria listed in Annex Ib Part II;
– oceno možnosti, da se po potrebi cestnoprometni predpisi uskladijo na ravni Unije;
- The assessment of the possibilit y to harmonise traffic rules at Union level where appropriate;
– oceno programskih aplikacij, navedenih v členu 4(4), da se zagotovi ustrezno izvajanje te direktive, hkrati pa tudi učinkovita, hitra, varna in zaupna izmenjava specifičnih podatkov iz registrov vozil (VRD).
- The assessment of the software application s as referred to in Article 4 (4) , with a view to ensuring proper implementation of th is Directive as well as guaranteeing an effective, expeditious, secure and confidential exchange of specific VRD.
Člen o reviziji direktive mora predstaviti možnosti za napredek na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu v prihodnosti, zlasti pri usklajevanju postopkov izvrševanja, obveznem nadzoru in cestnoprometnih predpisih.
This article on the revision of the Directive should give a perspective to further progress in the field of road safety, especially on the harmonisation of enforcement procedures, of the controls to be made and of traffic rules.
Komisija se pri pripravi pregleda te direktive posvetuje z vsemi ustreznimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, dejavnimi v varnosti v cestnem prometu, zlasti z združenji žrtev, organi za varnost v cestnem prometu ter organi pregona (TISPOL), strokovnjaki itd.
In preparing the review of this D irective, the Commission shall consult all the relevant road-safety stakeholders, especially victims associations, road safety and law enforcement authorities (TISPOL), experts, etc.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, v štiriindvajsetih mesecih .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by twenty-four months after the entry into force of this Directive.
O tem takoj obvestijo Komisijo .
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje osemnajst mesecev po začetku njene veljavnosti .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by eighteen months after the entry into force of this Directive.
Komisiji nemudoma pošljejo besedilo navedenih predpisov ter korelacijsko tabelo med navedenimi predpisi in to direktivo .
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive .
Rok za prenos bi bilo treba skrajšati, saj se rok dveh let za upoštevanje obveznosti uporabe sistema EUCARIS, ki je že v veljavi, ne zdi potreben.
The time for transposition should be shortened, as it does not seem necessary to have two years to comply with the obligation to use the EUCARIS system, which is already in force.
Podatki glede poizvedbe iz člena 4
Data elements related to the search - referred to in Article 4
M = obvezno, če je na voljo v nacionalnem registru, O = poljubno.
M = mandatory when available in national register, O = optional.
2 Usklajena okrajšava dokumentov, glej Direktivo Sveta 1999/37/ES z dne 29.4.1999.
2 Harmonised document abbreviation, see Council Directive 1999/37/EC of 29.4.1999.
Podatki o vozilu
Data relating to the vehicle
Država registracije
Member State of registration
Registrska številka
Licence number
Podatki o prekršku
Data relating to the offence
Država prekrška
Member State of the offence
Referenčni datum prekrška
Reference date of the offence
Referenčni čas prekrška
Reference time of the offence
Namen poizvedbe
Purpose of the search
Koda za vrsto prekrška, navedenega v členu 2 direktive
Code indicating the type of offence as listed in Article 2 of the Directive
3 = Neuporaba varnostnega pasu
3 = Non use of seat belt
4 = Vožnja skozi rdečo luč
4 = Failing to stop at red traffic light
5 = Uporaba prepovedanega voznega pasu
5 = Use of forbidden lane
10 = Vožnja pod vplivom mamil
10 = Driving under the influence of drugs
11 = Vožnja brez zaščitne čelade
11 = Failing to wear a safety helmet
12 = Nezakonita uporaba prenosnega telefona ali druge komunikacijske naprave med vožnjo
12 = Illegally using a mobile phone or any other communication devices while driving
Posredovani podatki iz člena 4
Data elements provided - referred to in Article 4
Številka šasije/VIN
Chassis number/VIN
Država registracije
Country of registration
Trgovska vrsta vozila
Commercial type of the vehicle
Kategorijska oznaka EU
EU Category Code
Podatki o imetnikih ali lastnikih vozila
Data relating to holders or owners of the vehicle
Podatki o imetnikih vozila
Data relating to holders of the vehicle
Usklajena okrajšava dokumentov, glej Direktivo Sveta 1999/37/ES z dne 29.4.1999. )
Harmonised document abbreviation, see Council Directive 1999/37/EC of 29.4.1999. )
Podatki se nanašajo na imetnika določenega potrdila o registraciji.
The data refer to the holder of the specific registration certificate.
Ime imetnikov (podjetja) registracije
Registration holders' (company) name
Za priimek, medpone, naziv itd. se uporabijo ločena polja, ime pa se sporoči v natisljivi obliki.
separate fields shall be used for surname, infixes, titles, etc., and the name in printable format shall be communicated
Za ime(na) in začetnice se uporabijo ločena polja, ime pa se sporoči v natisljivi obliki.
separate fields for first name(s) and initials shall be used, and the name in printable format shall be communicated
Za ulico, hišno številko, poštno številko, kraj bivanja, državo bivanja itd. se uporabijo ločena polja , naslov pa se sporoči v natisljivi obliki.
separate fields shall be used for Street, House number and Annex, Post code, Place of residence, Country of residence, etc., and the Address in printable format shall be communicated
Pravni status
Legal entity
Kraj rojstva
Place of Birth
Identifikacijska številka
ID Number
Identifikator, ki na edinstven način identificira osebo ali družbo.
An identifier that uniquely identifies the person or the company.
Podatki o lastniku vozila
Data relating to owners of the vehicle
(C.2) Podatki se nanašajo na lastnika vozila
(C.2) The data refer to the owner of the vehicle.
Pri odpadnih vozilih, ukradenih vozilih ali registrskih tablicah ali pri poteklih avtomobilskih registracijah se podatki o lastniku/imetniku ne vpišejo.
In case of scrap vehicles, stolen vehicles or number plates, or outdated vehicle registration no owner /holder information shall be provided.
Namesto tega se pošlje sporočilo „podatek ni razkrit“.
Instead, the message "Information not disclosed" shall be returned.
Nova priloga je vključitev točke 1.2.2 poglavja 3 priloge k Sklepu 2008/616/PNZ z nekaterimi prilagoditvami.
This new annex is the insertion of the Point 1.2.2 of Chapter 3 of the Annex to Decision 2008/616/JHA with some adaptations.
Priloga - I b (novo)
Annex I b (new)
Priloga Ib
Annex Ib
Del I: Usmeritve glede smernic za varnost v cestnem prometu
Part I: orientations for guidelines for road safety policies
Smernice je treba predlagati na ravni Unije, da bi s primerljivimi metodami, praksami, standardi in pogostostjo nadzora zagotovili večje zbliževanje pri izvrševanju cestnoprometnih predpisov, ki ga izvajajo države članice.
Guidelines should be proposed at the Union level in order t o ensure greater convergence in the enforcement of road traffic rules by Member States through comparable methods, practices, standards and frequency of control s .
Države članice bi morale spodbujati uporabo avtomatske opreme za nadzor hitrosti na avtocestah, stranskih cestah in mestnih ulicah, zlasti na odsekih cestnega omrežja, kjer so nesreče zaradi prekoračitve hitrosti pogostejše od povprečja.
The use of automatic checking equipment for speed on motorways, secondary roads and urban roads should be encouraged by Member States in particular on those sections of the road network where the number of accidents caused by speeding is higher than average.
Opremo bi bilo treba uporabiti na celotnem ozemlju držav članic.
This use should try to ensure good geographical coverage of the territory of each Member State .
Posebej si je treba prizadevati glede števila kontrol hitrosti z avtomatsko opremo v državah članicah, kjer je število smrtnih žrtev v nesrečah nad povprečjem Evropske unije ali kjer se število smrtnih žrtev od leta 2001 zmanjšuje manj od povprečja EU.
Specific efforts should be made regarding the number of speed checks using automatic equipment in Member States where the number of road fatalities is above the EU average or the fall in the number of road fatalities is below the EU average since 2001.
Glede vožnje pod vplivom alkohola bi bilo treba države članice spodbujati, naj v prvi vrsti izvajajo naključne kontrole na mestih in v času pogostih kršitev predpisov in ko se poveča tveganje za nesreče.
As regards drink-driving, Member States should be encouraged to carry out random tests as a priority in places where, and at times when, non-compliance is frequent and the risk of accidents increases.
Vsako leto bi bilo treba testirati pomemben delež voznikov.
A significant proportion of drivers should be tested annually.
Glede uporabe varnostnih pasov se v državah članicah, kjer pomemben delež uporabnikov cest ne uporablja varnostnega pasu, v določenem letnem obdobju izvaja intenziven nadzor, še zlasti na mestih in v času, kjer in ko so kršitve pogoste.
As regards the use of seat belts, intensive checking operations should be conducted during determined period of time in any one year by Member States where a significant proportion of road users do not wear seat belts, in particular in places where, and at times when, non-compliance is frequent.
Glede vožnje skozi rdečo luč je avtomatsko opremo za nadzor treba uporabljati predvsem na križiščih, kjer so kršitve predpisov pogoste in kjer nadpovprečno pogosto prihaja do nesreč zaradi vožnje skozi rdečo luč.
As regards failure to stop at a red traffic light, automatic checking equipment should be used primarily for junctions where the rules are often breached and a higher than average number of accidents occur as a result of driving through a red traffic light.
Del II: Merila za postopke izvršitve
Part II: criteria for enforcement procedures
Pri nadaljnjih postopkih v primeru neplačila denarne kazni bi morale države članice upoštevati skupna merila ne glede na upravno ali kazensko naravo kazni ter ob spoštovanju zakonodaje in postopkov držav članic.
Common criteria for follow-up procedures should be followed by Member States in the case of non-payment of a financial penalty irrespective of the administrative or penal nature of the sanction and respect ing Member States ' laws and procedures.
Merila bi morala zlasti upoštevati:
Such criteria should focus in particular on:
– prenos končne odločbe med različnimi pristojnimi organi držav članic prekrška in držav članic registracije;
- the transmission of the final decision between the different competent authorities of the Member States of the offence and the Member States of residence;
– priznavanje in izvrševanje končnih odločb ali neizvrševanje odločb;
- the recognition and the enforcement of the final decision; or non-enforcement of the decision.
– obveščanje ustreznih organov o odločbah za izvršitev.
- the information of the respective authorities on the decision of enforcement .
Nova priloga ponovno vključuje glavne elemente prve obravnave Parlamenta: smernice za varnost v cestnem prometu in splošna merila za postopke izvrševanja.
This new annex reinserts the main elements of the first reading of the Parliament: the road safety guidelines and general criteria for the enforcement procedures.
Te elemente mora Komisija preučiti v prihodnjem predlogu o varnosti v cestnem prometu.
These elements have to be examined by the European Commission in a future proposal on road safety.
Predlog Komisije za nov pravni instrument
The Commission's proposal for a new legal instrument
V beli knjigi o evropski prometni politiki, ki je bila objavljena leta 2001, si je Evropska unija zadala ambiciozen cilj, da do leta 2010 zmanjša število smrtnih žrtev na cestah za polovico.
The White Paper on European transport policy published in 2001 contained the ambitious objective of reducing by 50% the number of persons killed on the roads by 2010 for the European Union.
Napredek pa je bil viden predvsem v prvi polovici desetletja.
But this progress took place mostly during the first half of the decade.
Od leta 2005 se namreč število žrtev na cestah znižuje počasneje.
Since 2005 the reduction in the number of road deaths has been slowing down.
Glede na podatkovne zbirke o kazalnikih prometnih nesreč (CARE) se je število smrtnih žrtev leta 2009 še najprej znižalo za 11 %.
According to the Community database on road accidents (CARE) indicators, in 2009, the number of fatalities continued to decrease by 11%.
V skupnem se je v desetletju od 2001 do 2009 število smrtnih žrtev zmanjšalo za 36 %, kar žal ne dosega cilja iz bele knjige.
Overall the decade from 2001 until 2009 the number of fatalities decreased by 36%, which is unfortunately below the objective of the White Paper.
Predlog Komisije je sprva temeljil na študijah, ki so pokazale, da nerezidenti povzročijo nesorazmerno velik delež prometnih nesreč na cestah, zlasti s prekoračitvijo dovoljene hitrosti.
The origin of the proposal by the Commission came from studies showing the evidence that non-residents account for a disproportionately high number of road traffic accidents, particularly as regards speeding.
Ta relativna nekaznovanost spodkopava cilj varnosti na cestah in zmanjšuje legitimnost nadzora v očeh evropskih državljanov, kar govori v prid temu, da je treba rezidente in nerezidente obravnavati enako.
This relative impunity undermines the objectives of road safety and undermines the legitimacy of these controls in the eyes of European citizens, arguing that residents and non-residents must be treated equally.
Komisija namerava olajšati izvrševanje sankcij za voznike, ki so storili prekrške glede prekoračitve hitrosti, vožnje pod vplivom alkohola, neuporabe varnostnega pasu ali vožnje skozi rdečo luč v drugi državi članici.
The Commission intended to facilitate the enforcement of penalties against drivers who have committed offences relating to speeding, drink-driving, a failure to wear a seatbelt or failure to stop at red lights in a Member State other than their own.
Komisija se je namerno odločila, da področje uporabe direktive omeji na štiri prekrške, ki so vzrok največ nesreč s smrtnim izidom na cesti in se v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije obravnavajo kot prekrški.
The Commission deliberately chose to limit the scope of the Directive to the four offences, which are responsible for most fatalities and are all considered offences in all Member States of the European Union.
Predlog določa postopek izmenjave informacij med državami članicami prek omrežja za izmenjavo elektronskih podatkov, kar omogoča identifikacijo vozila, ki je bilo udeleženo pri prekršku.
The proposal established a procedure for exchanging information between Member States through an electronic data exchange network to identify a vehicle, which has committed an offence.
Po identifikaciji ustrezni organ države prekrška pošlje imetniku potrdila o registraciji vozila obvestilo o prekršku.
Following identification, an offence notification would have been sent by the relevant authority in the State of offence to the holder of the registration certificate of the vehicle concerned.
Prva obravnava v Parlamentu
Parliament's first reading
Evropski parlament je 17. decembra 2008 z veliko večino sprejel stališče na prvi obravnavi, ki predlog okrepi.
The European Parliament adopted on 17 December 2008 by a very large majority its position at first reading reinforcing the proposal.
Vključil je predvsem vseevropske smernice za prometno varnost, da bi z določitvijo minimalnih primerljivih meril okrepil nadzorne prakse na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu za prekoračitev dovoljene hitrosti, vožnjo pod vplivom alkohola, uporabo varnostnega pasu in vožnjo skozi rdečo luč.
Parliament inserted in particular EU-wide road safety guidelines aiming to strengthen road safety control practices for speeding, drink-driving, use of seatbelts and the failure to stop at red traffic light by establishing minimum comparable criteria.
Parlament je vključil tudi člen, ki države članice in Evropsko komisijo zavezuje, da uporabnikom cest zagotovijo potrebne informacije o ukrepih za izvajanje te direktive.
Parliament also inserted an Article forcing Member States and European Commission to provide road users with the necessary information about the measures implementing the Directive.