natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Haiti kot edina najmanj razvita država skupine držav CARIFORUMA ni podpisala sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
Haiti, as the only LDC of the CARIFORUM group, did not sign the EPA.
Kot najmanj razvita država lahko koristi načrt "vse razen orožja" v okviru sistema splošnih tarifnih preferencialov.
As LDC, it can benefit of the Everything But Arms schedule under the General System of Preferences (GSP).
Zaradi tega ni takojšnje potrebe, da se s sporazumom o gospodarskem sodelovanju zagotovi prost dostop do trga EU.
Therefore, the immediate need to secure the free access to the EU market via the EPA does not exist.
Glede na težavno politično in gospodarsko situacijo, ki vlada v državi, se ne sme izvajati pritiska na Haiti, temveč mu je treba pustiti čas, ki ga potrebuje za odločitev.
Given the difficult political and economic situation of the country, Haiti should not be pressed but given the time, it needs to decide.
Sporazum o gospodarskem sodelovanju z državami CARIFORUMA bi lahko ugodno vplival na razvoj karibskih držav.
The EPA with CARIFORUM could have positive impact on the development of the Caribbean countries.
Po mnenju poročevalca sta hitra ratifikacija in hiter proces izvajanja v povezavi z nujnimi reformami pogoja za pozitiven učinek sporazuma o gospodarskem sodelovanju.
In the view of your rapporteur, a swift ratification and implementation process combined with the necessary reforms are conditions to bring about the positive impact of the EPA.
Treba je izpostaviti, da so izboljšani dostop do trga za blago, naložbe in storitve bolj dostopne podjetjem EU v karibskih državah kot karibskim državam v Evropi zaradi pomanjkanja zmogljivosti.
It can not be neglected that the improved market access for goods, investment and services can be more easily seized by EU companies in the Caribbean than by Caribbean companies in Europe due to lack of capacity.
To lahko privede do neskladnega rezultata, močno odvisnega od izvajanja sporazuma.
This may lead to an unbalanced outcome - very much, depending on how the agreement is implemented.
Izvajanje sporazuma o gospodarskem sodelovanju in reforme lahko samo učinkujejo, če sporazum o gospodarskem sodelovanju spremljajo svežnji znatne razvojne pomoči trgovini, s katerimi se krijejo čiste carinske izgube in okrepi gospodarska dejavnost v državah CARIFORUMA.
Implementation of the EPA and reforms can only work properly if the EPA is accompanied by considerable Aid for Trade (AfT) packages to make up for net customs losses and increase the economic activity in the CARIFORUM states.
Vendar pa členi o razvojnem sodelovanju v sporazumu ne zavezujejo EU, da zagotovi dodatno finančno pomoč v zvezi s sporazumom o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
However, articles on development cooperation in the agreement do not bind the EU to provide additional financial assistance in connection to the EPA.
Glavni razlog za odločitev, da se v Sporazum iz Cotonouja vključi člen 36, je bilo dejstvo, da pravila v okviru Pogodb iz Lomeja glede prostega dostopa na trg EU za blago iz vseh držav AKP niso bila skladna s pravili WTO.
The main reason for the decision to include Article 36 in the Cotonou Agreement was the non-compatibility with WTO rules of the free access of goods from all ACP countries to the EU under the Lomé Treaties.
Zaradi tega obravnava največji del sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu promet z blagom.
Therefore, the biggest part of the EPA deals with the trade in goods.
Vsekakor pa so vse strani že od samega začetka naprej pojasnile, da morajo biti cilji sporazuma skladni s cilji Sporazuma iz Cotonouja o partnerstvu, kar je temelj za Sporazum o gospodarskem sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in državami CARIFORUMA.
However, it was made clear from the beginning by all parties that the objectives of the agreement would be in line with the objectives of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement, which is the basis of the EPA EC-CARIFORUM.
Sporazum o gospodarskem sodelovanju v členu 1 navaja prvi cilj, ki je „prispevati k zmanjšanju in končnemu izkoreninjenju revščine z vzpostavitvijo trgovinskega partnerstva, skladnega s ciljem trajnostnega razvoja, Razvojnimi cilji novega tisočletja in Sporazumom iz Cotonouja“, ki mu sledi cilj, to je „spodbujati regionalno povezovanje, gospodarsko sodelovanje in odgovorno vodenje države ter tako vzpostaviti in izvajati učinkovit, predvidljiv in pregleden regulativni okvir za trgovino in naložbe med pogodbenicami in v regiji CARIFORUM“.
The EPA itself (Article 1), formulates the "reduction and eventual eradication of poverty through the establishment of a trade partnership consistent with the objective sustainable development, the Millennium Development Goals and the Cotonou Agreement" as its first objective, followed by "promoting regional integration, economic cooperation and good governance thus establishing and implementing an effective, predictable and transparent regulatory framework for trade and investment between the Parties and the CARIFORUM region."
Sporazum o gospodarskem sodelovanju z državami CARIFORUMA je na različne načine tesno povezan s sporazumom iz Cotonouja.
The EPA with CARIFORUM is linked in different ways closely with the Cotonou agreement.
Ta sporazum je „osnovan na temeljnih načelih ter na bistvenih in temeljnih elementih Sporazuma iz Cotonouja“.
It is "based on the Fundamental Principles as well as the Essential and Fundamental Elements of the Cotonou Agreement".
Sporazum temelji na določbah Sporazuma iz Cotonouja in predhodnih sporazumov o partnerstvu AKP-ES [npr. štirje sporazumi iz Loméja in prejšnji sporazumi iz Yaoundéja] na področju regionalnega sodelovanja in povezovanja ter gospodarskega in trgovinskega sodelovanja.
It shall "build on the provisions of the Cotonou Agreement and the previous ACP-EC Partnership Agreements [i.e. the four Lomé-Agreements and the preceding Yaoundé-Agreements] in the area of regional cooperation and integration as well as economic and trade cooperation.
Sporazum vsebuje podrobna pravila za uvoz in izvoz blaga.
The agreement contains detailed rules for the import and export of goods.
EU je pripravljena, da od 1. januarja 2008 dalje ne uporablja več carin in kvot, večina držav CARIFORUMA bo v naslednjih 25 letih postopoma odprla svoje trge za približno 87% blaga, uvoženega iz EU ter s poreklom v EU.
The EU accepts to apply no customs duties and quotas since 1 January 2008, most CARIFORUM States will gradually open their markets for about 87% of the goods imported from the EU and originating in the EU over the next 25 years.
To bo povzročilo čisto izgubo carinskih prihodkov, vendar imajo države CARIFORUMA čas, da se prilagodijo in bodo tudi deležne podpore v okviru pomoči za trgovino.
This will lead to net-losses in customs revenue, but the CARIFORUM States have time to adjust and will be supported by Aid for Trade.
Pričakuje se, da bo nujna reforma sektorja za davčni in carinski sistem na splošno koristila razvoju sistema javnih financ držav CARIFORUMA.
It is hoped that the necessary reform in the customs and fiscal sector could be of benefit for the development of the public financial system of the CARIFORUM States in general.
Sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu vsebuje določbe o trgovini s storitvami, naložbah, konkurenci, inovacijah, intelektualni lastnini in javnih naročilih.
The EPA contains provisions for Trade in Services, investment, competition, innovation, intellectual property and procurement.
Vsa navedena področja so natančno preučili akterji v državah CARIFORUMA in EU.
All these areas have been examined with some preoccupation by players in the CARIFORUM States and in the EU.
Te določbe predvidevajo velike obveznosti, vendar tudi odpirajo možnosti za gospodarski razvoj.
Considerable obligations derive from these provisions, but they also open opportunities for economic development.
Težko predvidljiv pa je vpliv teh poglavij na razvoj držav CARIFORUMA.
The impact of these chapters on the development of the CARIFORUM States is difficult to predict.
Vendar so v sporazum vključeni zaščitni in spremljevalni ukrepi, ki bodo zagotovili uspešnost določb v smislu razvoja zadevnih držav.
However, safeguards are included as well as accompanying measures in order to make the provisions a success in terms of development of the countries concerned.
EU mora zelo prilagodljiva kar zadeva države CARIFORUM, pri čemer uporabi zaščitne ukrepe, zlasti v zvezi s stroški izvajanja in negotovih razvojnih vplivov.
The EU must show maximum flexibility in view of the CARIFORUM using safeguards especially in the light of implementation costs and the uncertain development impact.
Obstoječe finančne instrumente za razvojno sodelovanje bo uporabila EU kot spremljanje sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu z državami CARIFORUMA.
The available financial instruments for development cooperation will be used by the EU in order to accompany the EPA with CARIFORUM.
Finančna podpora se bo zagotovila iz regionalnih in nacionalnih usmerjevalnih programov evropskega razvojnega sklada kot tudi celovitih programov AKP.
Financial support will come from the Regional and National Indicative Programmes of the EDF as well as from the all-ACP programmes.
Poleg tega bodo države CARIFORUMA letno prejemale svoj delež pomoči, povezane s trgovino, ki znaša eno milijardo evrov in jo je obljubila EU in eno milijardo evrov, ki so jo obljubile države članice.
In addition, CARIFORUM will receive its share of the trade related assistance of annually € 1 billion pledged by the EU and € 1 billion pledged by the Member States.
Vendar pa je zagotovljeno malo dodatne finančne pomoči.
However, little additional finance is guaranteed.
Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in državami CARIFORUMA je bil sklenjen za posebne potrebe in v interesu držav karibskih držav.
The agreement EC-CARIFORUM has been negotiated for the specific needs and interests of the Caribbean ACP countries.
Prihodnji sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu v drugih regijah lahko vsebujejo bistveno drugačne določbe in lahko vključujejo različno število področij, odvisnih od razvoja posamezne regije.
Future EPAs in other regions may include considerable different provisions and could include a different number of areas, depending on the development of each region.
Odbor za razvoj poziva Odbor za mednarodno trgovino, naj kot pristojni odbor predlaga Parlamentu, da poda svoje soglasje za sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ki ga ratificirajo države CARIFORUMA in njihovi parlamenti, če tako določajo njihove ustave.
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament gives its assent to concluding the Economic Partnership Agreement subject to its ratification by CARIFORUM States and their parliaments where their constitutions so require.
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o trgovini z izdelki iz tjulnjev
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning trade in seals products
MNENJE ODBORA ZA OKOLJE, JAVNO ZDRAVJE IN VARNOST HRANE...................32
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY 32
MNENJE ODBORA ZA KMETIJSTVO IN RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA.......................................55
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT...56
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0469 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0469 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in ob upoštevanju členov 95 in 133 Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0295/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 95 and 133 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0295/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju izjave Evropskega parlamenta z dne 26. septembra 2006 o prepovedi proizvodov iz tjulnjev v Evropski uniji
– having regard to the declaration of the European Parliament of 26 September 2006 on banning seal products in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenj Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ter Odbora za kmetijstvo ( A6-0118/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Agriculture ( A6‑0118/2009 ),
(-1) V svoji izjavi z dne 26. septembra 2006 o prepovedi proizvodov iz tjulnjev v Evropski uniji 1 , je Evropski parlament pozval Komisijo, naj nemudoma oblikuje uredbo o prepovedi uvoza, izvoza in prodaje vseh izdelkov iz sedlastih in kapičastih tjulnjev.
(-1) In its declaration of 26 September 2006 on banning seal products in the European Union 1 , the European Parliament requested the Commission to immediately draft a regulation to ban the import, export and sale of all harp and hooded seal products.
V svoji resoluciji z dne 12. oktobra 2006 o akcijskem načrtu Skupnosti za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006 – 2010 2 , je Evropski parlament pozival Komisijo, naj predlaga popolno prepoved uvoza izdelkov iz tjulnjev.
In its resolution of 12 October 2006 on a Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010 2 , the European Parliament called on the Commission to propose a total import ban on seal products.
V svojem priporočilu 1776 (2006) z dne 17. novembra 2006 o lovu na tjulnje je Parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope priporočila, da se pozove države članice Sveta Evrope, ki se ukvarjajo z lovom na tjulnje, k prepovedi vseh krutih načinov lova, pri katerih živali ne umrejo takoj in brez trpljenja, ter prepoved omamljanja živali z instrumenti kot so harpune (hakapik), kiji in pištole, in spodbuja pobude, ki imajo za namen prepoved trgovine z izdelki iz tjulnjev.
In its Recommendation 1776 (2006) on seal hunting of 17 November 2006, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe recommended to invite the Member States of the Council of Europe practising seal hunting to ban all cruel hunting methods which do not guarantee the instantaneous death, without suffering, of the animals, to prohibit the stunning of animals with instruments such as hakapiks, bludgeons and guns, and to promote initiatives aimed at prohibiting trade in seal products.
2 UL C 308 E, 16.12.2006, str.
2 OJ C 308 E, 16.12.2006, p.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o akcijskem načrtu za dobro počutje živali 2006 – 2010 poziva Komisijo, da predlaga popolno prepoved uvoza izdelkov iz tjulnjev in pisna izjava Evropskega parlamenta o prepovedi proizvodov iz tjulnjev v Evropski uniji, ki jo je podpisalo 425 poslancev EP in ki je spodbudila predlagano prepoved trgovine z izdelki iz tjulnjev, ter priporočilo Sveta Evrope pozivata svoje države članice, da spodbujajo pobude, ki imajo za namen prepoved trgovine z izdelki iz tjulnjev, ki je delno spodbudilo predlagano uredbo.
The European Parliament’s Resolution on the Animal Welfare Action Plan 2006 – 2010 calls on the Commission to propose a total import ban on seal products and its Written Declaration Banning Seal Products In The European Union, signed by 425 MEPs and which prompted the proposed prohibition on seal product trade, and the Recommendation of the Council of Europe urged its members to promote initiatives aimed at prohibiting trade in seal products and, in part, prompted the proposed Regulation.
(1) Tjulnji so živali, ki lahko občutijo bolečino, stisko, strah ter druge oblike trpljenja.
(1) Seals are animals that can experience pain, distress, fear and other forms of suffering.
(1) Tjulnji so čuteče živali, ki lahko občutijo bolečino, stisko, strah ter druge oblike trpljenja.
(1) Seals are sentient animals that can experience pain, distress, fear and other forms of suffering.
Uvoz kož nekaterih tjulnjih mladičev (sedlastih in kapičastih tjulnjev) in izdelkov iz njih v države članice je zato prepovedan 1 .
The importation into Member States for commercial purposes of skins of certain seal pups (harp seal and hooded seal pups) and products derived therefrom is prohibited 1 .
1 Direktiva Sveta 83/129/EGS z dne 28. marca 1983 o uvozu kož nekaterih tjulnjih mladičev in izdelkov iz njih v države članice (UL L 91, z dne 9.4.1983, str.
1 Council Directive 83/129/EEC of 28 March 1983 concerning the importation into Member States of skins of certain seal pups and products derived therefrom (OJ L 91, 9.4.1983, p.
(2) Lov na tjulnje se izvaja v Skupnosti in zunaj nje ter se izvaja za pridobivanje izdelkov in proizvodov, kot so na primer meso, olje, mast, kožuhi in izdelki, narejeni iz njih, v komercialni prodaji na različnih trgih, vključno s trgom Skupnosti.
(2) Seals are hunted within and outside the Community and used for obtaining products and articles, such as meat, oil, blubber, fur skins and articles made therefrom, which are sold commercially on different markets, including the Community.
(2) Komercialni lov na tjulnje se izvaja v Skupnosti in zunaj nje za pridobivanje izdelkov in proizvodov, kot so na primer meso, olje, mast, kožuhi in izdelki, narejeni iz njih, v komercialni prodaji na različnih trgih, vključno s trgom Skupnosti.
(2) Commercial seal hunting is conducted within and outside the Community to obtain products and articles, such as meat, oil, blubber, fur skins and articles made therefrom, which are sold commercially on different markets, including the Community market .
(3) Javnost, vlade in Evropski parlament so večkrat izrazili zaskrbljenost glede ustreznosti ravnanja z živalmi pri lovu na tjulnje, saj obstajajo dokazi, da tjulnji niso bili usmrčeni in odrti brez povzročanja nepotrebne bolečine, stiske in drugih oblik trpljenja.
(3) The hunting of seals has led to expressions of serious concerns by members of the public, governments as well as the European Parliament sensitive to animal welfare considerations since there are indications that seals may not be killed and skinned without causing avoidable pain, distress and other forms of suffering.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane je v svoji znanstveni oceni o vidikih ustreznega ravnanja z živalmi pri načinih ubijanja in odiranja tjulnjev ugotovila, da je tjulnje mogoče hitro in učinkovito usmrtiti brez povzročanja nepotrebnih bolečin, stiske in trpljenja in da se v praksi usmrtitve ne izvajajo vedno učinkovito 1 .
The European Food Safety Authority concluded, in its scientific opinion on the Animal Welfare aspects of the killing and skinning of seals, that it is possible to kill seals rapidly and effectively without causing them avoidable pain or distress, whilst also reporting that in practice, effective and humane killing does not always happen 1 .
(3) Javnost, vlade in Evropski parlament so večkrat izrazili zaskrbljenost glede ustreznosti ravnanja z živalmi pri lovu na tjulnje, saj obstajajo jasni dokazi, da tjulnji , ki so bili usmrčeni med komercialnim lovom dosledno trpijo bolečine, stisko in druge oblike trpljenja.
(3) The hunting of seals has led to expressions of serious concerns by members of the public, governments as well as the European Parliament sensitive to animal welfare considerations since there is clear evidence that seals killed in commercial seal hunts consistently suffer pain, distress and other forms of suffering.
1 Znanstveno mnenje Sveta za zdravje in zaščito živali o vidikih ustreznega ravnanja z živalmi glede ubijanja in odiranja tjulnjev, pripravljeno na zahtevo Komisije.
1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission on the Animal Welfare aspects of the killing and skinning of seals.
The EFSA Journal (2007) 610, 1-122.
The EFSA Journal (2007) 610, 1-122.
Evropski državljani so zaskrbljeni zaradi trgovine, ki vključuje trpljenje prostoživečih živali in ne samo nepotrebne bolečine.
The concern of European citizens is about a trade involving suffering of wild animals, not only suffering which is avoidable.
Nepotrebne bolečine so lahko zelo velike.
Unavoidable suffering may be very considerable.
Predlog spremembe ne zadeva vprašanja, ali se teoretično lahko tjulnje usmrti na human način, ampak, če se jih lahko dosledno ubija na human način v okviru področij, kjer poteka lov na tjulnje.
The question is that, regardless of whether some seals can be killed humanely or not, seals cannot be consistently killed humanely in the field environments in which commercial seal hunts occur.
(3a) Leta 2007 je Komisija dala mandat Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane, na podlagi katerega je ocenila najprimernejše oziroma najustreznejše načine ubijanja tjulnjev, ki karseda zmanjšujejo nepotrebne bolečine, stiske ali druge oblike trpljenja, vendar od agencije ni zahtevala, naj oceni, ali je ubijanje med komercialnim lovom dejansko humano, oziroma bi lahko postalo humano, glede na pogoje, v okviru katerih poteka lov.
(3a) In 2007, the Commission gave a mandate to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to assess the most appropriate or suitable killing methods for seals which reduce unnecessary pain, distress and suffering to the greatest extent possible, but did not request that the EFSA evaluate whether the killing in commercial seal hunts is in fact humane or could ever be made humane , given the conditions under which the hunting occurs.
Komisija ni zahtevala, da Evropska agencija za varnost hrane oceni, ali komercialni lovi na tjulnje poteka trenutno na human način, ampak najustreznejše načine ubijanja tjulnjev, ki bi karseda zmanjšali nepotrebne bolečine, stiske ali druge oblike trpljenja.
The Commission did not ask EFSA to assess whether commercial seal hunting is currently conducted in a humane fashion, but rather the most appropriate killing methods for seals to reduce as much as possible unnecessary pain, distress and suffering.
Načini ubijanja, ki so priporočeni v poročilu Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in v predlogu uredbe, ne predpisujejo humanega ubijanja, kot bi to opredelil vsak ugleden veterinarski organ.
The killing methods recommended in EFSA’s report and the draft Regulation do not prescribe humane killing as any reputable veterinary authority would define it.
(3b) Komisija je prejela na tisoče pisem, elektronske pošte in peticij, v katerih državljani EU ogorčeno nasprotujejo trgovini z izdelki iz tjulnjev, ki poteka v neurejenih okoliščinah, ki povzročajo, da je ubijanje samo po sebi nehumano.
(3b) The Commission has received thousands of letters, e-mails and petitions expressing EU citizens’ overwhelming opposition regarding the trade in seal products undertaken in unregulated circumstances which render the killing inherently inhumane.
Ta dodatek beleži nasprotovanje javnosti trgovini z izdelki iz tjulnjev, ki ga odražajo evropski državljani in ostali v zadnjih letih.
This addition records the public opposition to seal product trade reflected by European citizens and others in recent years.
Vzet je iz obrazložitvenega memoranduma, ki spremlja komisijski osnutek uredbe.
It is taken from the Explanatory Memorandum accompanying the Commission’s draft Regulation.
(4) Zaradi zaskrbljenosti glede ustreznega ravnanja z živalmi pri ubijanju in odiranju tjulnjev je več držav članic sprejelo ali namerava sprejeti zakonodajo za ureditev trgovine z izdelki iz tjulnjev s prepovedjo njihovega uvoza in proizvodnje, medtem ko v drugih državah članicah ni nobenih omejitev v trgovini s temi izdelki.
(4) In response to the concern about the animal welfare aspects of the killing and skinning of seals, several Member States have adopted or intend to adopt legislation regulating trade in seal products, by prohibiting their import, and production, while no restrictions are placed on the trade in these products in other Member States.