natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pripravljavka mnenja se strinja s splošnim pristopom predloga in osnovno idejo, da bi moralo biti imetniku dokumenta, na podlagi katerega je lahko zakonito prisoten na ozemlju ene od držav članic, omogočeno potovanje po schengenskem območju za namene krajšega prebivanja za tri mesece v roku pol leta.
Your rapporteur agrees with the general approach of the proposal, and its underlying philosophy that people should be able to travel around the Schengen area for short stays for three months in any ha1f year with the document on the basis of which they are legally present in a Member State.
Nesprejemljivo je, da državljani tretjih držav z dokazili o zakonitem prebivanju v eni od držav članic ne morejo izkoristiti enake stopnje prostega gibanja, kot ga omogoča dovoljenje za prebivanje.
It is unacceptable that third-country nationals able to prove that they are legally resident in a Member State cannot benefit from a level of freedom of movement which would accompany a residence permit.
Imetniki takšnih vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje bi lahko bili študenti ali učenci, ki želijo na ekskurzijo v drugo državo članico
Such long-stay visa holders could for example be students or schoolchildren wanting to go to a field trip in another Member State
Direktiva Sveta 2004/114/ES z dne 13. decembra 2004 o pogojih za sprejem državljanov tretjih držav za namene študija, izmenjav učencev, neplačanega usposabljanja ali prostovoljnega dela, UL L 375, str.
Council Directive 2004/114/EC of 13 December 2004 on the conditions of admission of third-country nationals for the purposes of studies, pupil exchange, unremunerated training or voluntary service, OJ L 375/12. , scientists
Direktiva Sveta 2003/86/ES z dne 22. septembra 2003 o pravici do ponovne združitve družine , UL L 251, 3.10.2003, str.
Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification, OJ L 251, 3.10.2003, p.
12–18. in državljanov Unije
12–18. and Union citizens
Direktiva Sveta 2003/109/ES z dne 25. novembra 2003 o statusu državljanov tretjih držav, ki so rezidenti za daljši čas, UL L 16, 23.1.2004, str.
Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, OJ L 16, 23.1.2004, p.
Pripravljavka mnenja je prepričana, da bi zagotovitev takega prostega gibanja in zmanjšanje birokracije pomagala privabiti študente, znanstvenike in podjetja v Evropo.
Guaranteeing this freedom of movement and cutting red tape would also, in the view of your rapporteur, contribute to attracting students, scientists and businesses to Europe.
Ker gre za nujno in hitro rešitev kompleksnega problema, pripravljavka mnenja poleg tega meni, da bi lahko predlog dolgoročno imel neželene posledice, zlasti če se bodo vizumi za dolgoročno prebivanje urejali na ravni Unije.
Furthermore, your rapporteur also considers that the proposal, as it is an urgent solution to a complex problem, may have unintended consequences in the long term, particularly in the event that long-term visas are to be regulated at Union level.
Zato je bila dodana klavzula o pregledu in poročanju, v skladu s katero mora Komisija predložiti poročilo o uporabi uredbe najpozneje do 5. aprila 2012.
A reporting and review clause has therefore been inserted, requiring the Commission to submit a report on the application of the Regulation no later than 5 April 2012.
Pripravljavka mnenja meni, da je v tem predlogu poseben poudarek namenjen tudi uporabi prava Unije, in sicer v zvezi s tem, da veliko državam članicam ne uspe izdati dovoljenj za prebivanje v določenem roku, čeprav zakon določa, da je to obvezno.
Your rapporteur considers that the application of Union law is also at the heart of this proposal, namely the failure of many Member States to issue residence permits within certain time-limits, even when this is set out in mandatory terms in legislation.
Zato poziva Komisijo, naj preuči stanje v posameznih državah članicah in po potrebi sproži postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, da zagotovi spoštovanje zakonitosti.
For this reason, your rapporteur calls on the Commission to examine individual situations in the Member States, and where possible, start infringement procedures to ensure that legality is respected.
Komisija bi se morala opreti na že dolgo veljavno sodno prakso, v skladu s katero lahko celo razmeroma nepomembne, vendar splošne in vztrajno ponavljajoče se upravne prakse predstavljajo kršitev, kljub formalno pravilnemu prenosu prava v pravo držav članic
The Commission should base itself on long-standing case-law according to which even relatively minor but general and persistent administrative practices many constitute an infringement, despite formally correct transposition by the Member State
Glej na primer zadevo C-494/01 Komisija proti Irski , 26. april 2005, veliki senat. .
For instance, see Case C-494/01 Commission v. Ireland , 26 April 2005, Grand Chamber. .
Treba je jasneje poudariti, da sedanja predloga držav članic nikakor ne odvezujeta od obveznosti izdajanja dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki so določene v različnih instrumentih Skupnosti.
It should also be made clearer that the present proposals in no way excuse the Member States from their obligations, provided in various Community instruments, to issue residence permits.
Glede na nujnost tega dokumenta si pripravljavka mnenja pridržuje možnost dopolnitve tega osnutka mnenja, ko bo postopek napredoval skozi institucije in glede na začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe
Given the urgency of the file, your rapporteur reserves the possibility to complete this draft opinion, as the procedure progresses through the institutions, and in the light of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon
Glej zlasti člen 77(2)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki določa redni zakonodajni postopek. , in sicer z vložitvijo dodatnih predlogov sprememb po običajnem postopku.
See in particular Article 77(2)(a) TFEU which provides for the ordinary legislative procedure. , by tabling further amendments as per the usual procedure.
Ta pravni in praktični položaj ima pomembne negativne posledice glede gibanja na schengenskem območju za državljane tretjih držav, ki na podlagi vizuma za dolgoročno prebivanje zakonito prebivajo v eni od držav članic.
This legal and practical situation has important negative consequences on third-country nationals legally staying in a Member State on the basis of a long-stay visa regarding their circulation in the Schengen area .
Vendar pa vedno večje število držav članic ne nadomešča vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje z dovoljenji za prebivanje ali pa to počno s precejšnjimi zamudami po prihodu državljanov tretjih držav na njihovo ozemlje.
However, long-stay visas are not replaced with residence permits by an increasing number of Member States or are replaced only with considerable delays after the entry of third-country nationals into their territory.
Ta pravni in praktični položaj ima pomembne negativne posledice za gibanje na schengenskem območju za državljane tretjih držav, ki na podlagi vizuma za dolgoročno prebivanje zakonito prebivajo v eni od držav članic.
This legal and practical situation has important negative consequences for the circulation in the Schengen area of third-country nationals legally staying in a Member State on the basis of a long-stay visa.
Jezikovna pojasnitev.
Linguistic clarification
(6) Ta uredba ni namenjena spodbujanju držav članic k temu, da ne bi izdajale dovoljenj za prebivanje, in ne bi smela vplivati na obveznost držav članic, da izdajajo dovoljenja za prebivanje nekaterim kategorijam državljanov tretjih držav, kakor je določeno v drugih instrumentih Skupnosti.
(6) This Regulation does not aim at encouraging Member States not to issue residence permits and it should not affect the obligation of Member States to issue residence permits for certain categories of third-country nationals set out by other Community instruments.
(6) Ta uredba ni namenjena temu, da bi države članice odvrnila od izdajanja dovoljenj za prebivanje, in ne bi smela vplivati na obveznost držav članic, da izdajajo dovoljenja za prebivanje nekaterim kategorijam državljanov tretjih držav, kakor je določeno v drugih instrumentih Skupnosti.
(6) This Regulation does not aim to discourage Member States from issuing residence permits and it should not affect the obligation on Member States to issue residence permits for certain categories of third-country nationals set out by other Community instruments.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na obveznost držav članic, da izdajajo dovoljenja za prebivanje državljanom tretjih držav, kakor je določeno v drugih instrumentih prava Skupnosti.
This Regulation shall not affect the obligation for Member States to issue residence permits to third-country nationals as provided by other instruments of Community law.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na obveznost držav članic, da izdajajo dovoljenja za prebivanje državljanom tretjih držav ob upoštevanju rokov , kakor je določeno v drugih instrumentih prava Skupnosti , zlasti v
This Regulation shall not affect the obligation for Member States to issue residence permits to third-country nationals in compliance with time-limits and as provided by other instruments of Community law , in particular
– Direktivi Sveta 2005/71/ES,
– Council Directive 2005/71/EC,
– Direktivi Sveta 2004/114/ES,
– Council Directive 2004/114/EC,
– Direktivi Sveta 2003/86/ES,
– Council Directive 2003/86/EC,
– Direktivi Sveta 2004/38/ES in
– Council Directive 2004/38/EC, and
– Direktivi Sveta 2003/109/ES .
– Council Directive 2003/109/EC .
Komisija najpozneje do 5. aprila 2012 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o uporabi te uredbe in Uredbe [200X/0000] o gibanju oseb z vizumom za dolgoročno prebivanje.
Not later than 5 April 2012 , the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of this Regulation and of Regulation [200X/0000] on movement of persons with a long-stay visa .
Poročilu po potrebi priloži predloge za prilagoditev te uredbe.
If necessary, the report shall be accompanied by proposals to adapt this Regulation.
Ker gre za nujno in hitro rešitev kompleksnega problema, bi lahko obe uredbi dolgoročno imeli neželene posledice, zlasti če se bodo po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe vizumi za dolgoročno prebivanje urejali na ravni Unije .
As an urgent solution to a complex problem, both Regulations may have unintended consequences in the long term, particularly in the event that long-term visas are to be regulated at Union level following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma v zvezi z vizumi za dolgoročno prebivanje in razpisi ukrepov v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement as regards long stay visa and alerts in the Schengen Information System
Pripravljavec mnenja: Piotr Borys
Rapporteur: Piotr Borys
To, da imetniki vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje uživajo manj svobode gibanja v schengenskem območju kot imetniki vizumov za kratkoročno prebivanje, se utegne zdeti nekoliko protislovno.
It may seem somewhat paradoxical that many holders of long-stay visas enjoy less freedom of movement in the Schengen area than holders of short-stay visas.
Možna rešitev za odpravo tega protislovja je predlagana v dveh tesno povezanih predlogih Komisije; eden se obravnava po postopku posvetovanja
Two closely related Commission proposals, one under the consultation procedure
Pravna podlaga: člen 63(3)(a) ES. , drugi pa po postopku soodločanja
Legal basis: Article 63(3)(a) EC. and the other under the codecision procedure
Pravna podlaga: člen 62(2)(a) in (3) ES. .
Legal basis: Articles 62(2)(a) and (3) EC. , attempt to provide a solution to this paradox.
Če bosta sprejeta, bosta imetnikom vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje omogočila, da se enako kot imetniki vizumov za kratkoročno prebivanje prosto gibljejo v schengenskem območju.
If adopted, they would enable holders of long-stay visas to move freely throughout the Schengen area in an equivalent way to holders of short-stay visas.
Rešitev, ki jo predlaga Komisija, zaobide praktične pomanjkljivosti in zamude, povezane z izdajanjem dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki jih imetniki vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje opažajo v številnih državah članicah.
The solution proposed by the Commission side-steps the practical disadvantages and delays observed in many Member States by long-stay visa holders concerning the issuing of residence permits.
Ureditev, ki se uporablja sedaj
The arrangement which is currently applicable
Zato je ta zadeva postala precej nujna.
This has rendered the question rather urgent.
Stališče pripravljavca mnenja
Position of the rapporteur
Pripravljavec mnenja se strinja s splošnim pristopom predloga in njegovo osnovno idejo, da bi moralo biti imetniku dokumenta, na podlagi katerega je lahko zakonito prisoten na ozemlju ene od držav članic, omogočeno potovati po schengenskem območju za namene krajšega prebivanja za tri mesece v vsakem polletnem obdobju.
Your rapporteur agrees with the general approach of the proposal, and its underlying philosophy that people should be able to travel around the Schengen area for short stays for three months in any half year with the document on the basis of which they are legally present in a Member State.
Nesprejemljivo je, da državljani tretjih držav z dokazili o zakonitem prebivanju v eni od držav članic ne morejo izkoristiti enake stopnje prostega gibanja kot ga omogoča dovoljenje za prebivanje.
It is unacceptable that third-country nationals able to prove that they are legally resident in a Member State cannot benefit from a level of freedom of movement which would accompany a residence permit.
Imetniki vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje so lahko na primer študenti ali šolarji, ki se želijo udeležiti ekskurzije v drugo državo članico
Such long-stay visa holders could for example be students or schoolchildren wanting to go to a field trip in another Member State
12–18). , državljani Unije
12–18. and Union citizens
Da bi takšen sistem deloval in da se prepreči „trgovanje z vizumi“ (ang. visa shopping), kjer se lahko osebe izognejo zavrnitvi izdaje vizuma v eni državi članici tako, da zaprosijo za izdajo v drugi, je treba uvesti preverjanje, ki bo takšno, kot že obstaja na drugih področjih, da se zagotovi ustrezna komunikacija med državami članicami in skladnost pri izdajanju vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje in dovoljenj za prebivanje ter razpisovanju ukrepov v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu.
However, in order for such a system to function, and in order to avoid "visa shopping" whereby persons are able to circumvent the refusal of a visa by one Member State by applying to another, checks equivalent to those existing in other areas must be put in place in order to ensure proper communication between Member States and consistency between the issuing of long-stay visas, residence permits and alerts in the SIS.
Ker gre za nujno rešitev kompleksnega problema, pripravljavec mnenja tudi meni, da bi lahko predlog dolgoročno imel neželene posledice, zlasti če se bodo vizumi za dolgoročno prebivanje urejali na ravni Unije.
Furthermore, your rapporteur also considers that the proposal, as it is an urgent solution to a complex problem, may have unintended consequences in the long term, particularly in the event that long-term visas are to be regulated at Union level.
Zato je bila dodana klavzula o pregledu in poročanju.
A reporting and review clause has therefore been inserted.
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da je bistvo tega predloga tudi uporaba prava Unije, saj več državam članicam ne uspe izdati dovoljenj za prebivanje v določenem roku, čeprav zakonodaja to določa kot obvezno.
Your rapporteur considers that the application of Union law is also at the heart of this proposal, namely the failure of many Member States to issue residence permits within certain time-limits, even when this is set out in mandatory terms in legislation.
Upoštevati je treba, da tudi tretje države opažajo te razmere.
It must be borne in mind that third countries also witness this state of affairs.
Unija bi morala zato storiti kar največ, da zagotovi skladnost postopkov, ki se uporabljajo v različnih državah članicah.
The Union should therefore do its utmost to ensure that the procedures applying in different Member States are consistent.
Pripravljavec mnenja zato poziva Komisijo, naj preuči stanje v posameznih državah članicah in kjer je to mogoče sproži postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, da zagotovi spoštovanje zakonitosti.
For this reason, your rapporteur calls on the Commission to examine individual situations in the Member States, and where possible, start infringement procedures to ensure that legality is respected.
Komisija se mora opreti na uveljavljeno sodno prakso, v skladu s katero lahko za kršitev veljajo tudi sorazmerno nepomembne, ampak splošno uveljavljene in ponavljajoče se upravne prakse, čeprav jih je država članica uradno pravilno prenesla
The Commission should base itself on long-standing case-law according to which even relatively minor but general and persistent administrative practices many constitute an infringement, despite formally correct transposition by the Member State
Glej na primer zadevo C-494/01 Komisija proti Irski, 26. april 2005, veliki senat. .
For instance, see Case C-494/01 Commission v. Ireland , 26 April 2005, Grand Chamber. .
Bolj jasno bi moralo biti tudi, da pričujoča predloga nikakor ne odvezujeta držav članic od obveznosti izdajanja dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki so določene v različnih instrumentih Skupnosti.
It should also be made clearer that the present proposals in no way excuse the Member States from their obligations, provided in various Community instruments, to issue residence permits.
Upoštevati je treba tudi, da je pričujoči predlog neločljivo povezan s predlogom Komisije o gibanju oseb z vizumom za dolgoročno prebivanje (KOM(2009)091) in bi ju bilo treba zato obravnavati skupaj.
It must also be kept in mind that the present proposal is inextricably linked and should therefore be read together with the Commission proposal on the movement of persons with a long-stay visa (COM(2009)091).
Po mnenju pripravljavca mnenja bi morala pravica do prostega gibanja, kot je določena v členu 21(1) Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma, ki jo omenjeni predlog spreminja, veljati tudi za državljane tretjih držav z veljavnim vizumom za dolgoročno prebivanje, ki ga je izdala ena od držav članic, kakor je določeno v členu 18 Konvencije, to pa bi moralo biti ustrezno navedeno na vizumski nalepki, in sicer z opredelitvijo ozemelj, kamor lahko imetnik vizuma potuje.
In your rapporteur’s opinion, the right to free movement as laid down in the Article 21(1) of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement, amended in the latter proposal, should also apply to third-country nationals who hold a valid long-stay visa issued by one of the Member States as provided for in Article 18 of the Convention and should be indicated accordingly on the visa sticker by a specification of the territory in which visa holder is entitled to travel .
Pripravljavec mnenja nazadnje opozarja na skrajno nujnost, da schengenski informacijski sistem II in vizumski informacijski sistem začneta delovati čim prej.
Finally, your rapporteur recalls the absolute necessity of SIS II and VIS starting operations as soon as possible.
Meni, da bo schengenski informacijski sistem II prinesel znatne izboljšave in nove funkcije, kot so uvedba biometričnih podatkov in medsebojna povezanost razpisov ukrepov, kar bo prispevalo k boljšemu nadzoru zunanjih meja in okrepljeni varnosti.
He considers that SIS II will bring considerable improvements and new functionalities such as the introduction of biometric data and the interlinking of alerts, which will contribute to better control of external borders and strengthened security.
Zamude pri uvajanju teh dveh sistemov bodo vplivale tudi na učinkovitost zakonodaje, ki je s tem povezana.
The delayed timetable in the implementation of both systems is also prejudicial to the effectiveness of related legislation.
Glede na nujnost dokumenta si pripravljavec mnenja pridržuje možnost, da med postopkom v institucijah in ob upoštevanju začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe ta osnutek mnenja dopolni z vložitvijo novih predlogov sprememb po običajnem postopku
Given the urgency of the file, your rapporteur reserves the possibility to complete this draft opinion by tabling further amendments as per the usual procedure, as the procedure progresses through the institutions, and in the light of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon
Glej zlasti člen 77(2)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki določa redni zakonodajni postopek. .
See in particular Article 77(2)(a) TFEU which provides for the ordinary legislative procedure. .
Konvencija o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma
The Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement
Člen 25 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Kadar pogodbenica obravnava izdajo dovoljenja za prebivanje, sistematično opravi iskanje v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu.
Where a Contracting Party considers issuing a residence permit, it shall carry out a search in the Schengen Information System.
Kadar pogodbenica obravnava izdajo dovoljenja za prebivanje tujcu, za katerega je bil razpisan ukrep zavrnitve vstopa, se najprej posvetuje s pogodbenico, ki je ukrep razpisala, in upošteva njene interese; dovoljenje za prebivanje se izda samo iz utemeljenih razlogov, če ima zadevna država članica znatne potrebe, da to stori , kakor so humanitarni razlogi ali mednarodne obveznosti.“
Where a Contracting Party considers issuing a residence permit to an alien for whom an alert has been issued for the purposes of refusing entry, it shall first consult the Contracting Party issuing the alert and shall take account of its interests; the residence permit shall be issued only for substantive reasons and where there is a substantial need for the Contracting Party concerned to do so , notably on humanitarian grounds or by reason of international commitments."
Ta predlog spremembe je treba brati skupaj s členom 1(2) iz predloga Komisije, ki med drugim razširja zgornji odstavek na vizume za dolgoročno prebivanje.
This amendment has to be read in combination with Article 1(2) of the Commission's proposal which inter alia extends the above paragraph to long-stay visas.
Predlog spremembe zahteva, da pristojni organi pred izdajo dovoljenja za prebivanje ali vizuma za dolgoročno prebivanje sistematično opravijo iskanje v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu in s tem zagotovijo, da ne bo prišlo do dodatnega tveganja za varnost.
The amendment requests that the responsible authorities check SIS systematically before issuing residence permits or long-stay visas, thereby clarifying that there will be no extra security risk.
V praksi bi to pomagalo v boju proti tako imenovanemu „trgovanju z vizumi“ (ang. visa shopping).
In practice, this would help to combat the practice known as "visa shopping".
(1b) V členu 25 se vstavi naslednji odstavek:
(1b) In Article 25, the following paragraph is inserted:
Pred razpisom ukrepa za zavrnitev vstopa pogodbenice preverijo svoje nacionalne evidence izdanih vizumov za dolgoročno prebivanje ali dovoljenj za prebivanje.“
Prior to issuing an alert for the purposes of refusing entry, the Contracting Party shall check its national records for issued long-stay visa or residence permits."
Predlog spremembe poskuša zagotoviti, da so podatki, shranjeni v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu, skladni z izdanimi vizumi za dolgoročno prebivanje ali dovoljenji za prebivanje.
The amendment seeks to ensure that the information recorded in the SIS is coherent with the long-stay visas or permits issued.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na obveznost držav članic, da izdajajo dovoljenja za prebivanje državljanom tretjih držav v skladu z roki in kakor je določeno v drugih instrumentih prava Skupnosti, zlasti v
This Regulation shall not affect the obligation on Member States to issue residence permits to third-country nationals in compliance with time-limits and as provided for by other instruments of Community law, in particular