natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(a) Premik k „pristopu, ki temelji na znanosti”
a) Moving to a ‘ science-based ’ approach
Odličnost mora biti najpomembnejše gonilo za financiranje raziskav, „pristop, ki temelji na rezultatih”, pa lahko zmanjša znanstvene ambicije raziskovalcev.
Excellence must be the most important driving force for research funding and a ‘result-based’ approach may lower the scientific ambition of researchers.
Posledično poročevalka predlaga sistem financiranja, „ki temelji na znanosti”, namesto pristopa, „ki temelji na rezultatih”.
Consequently, instead of a ‘result based’ approach, the rapporteur proposes a ‘science-based’ funding system.
Ta bo s sabo prinesel poenostavitev nadzora finančne plati, poudarek na znanstveno tehnični plati in medsebojne preglede, ki temeljijo na odličnosti.
This will entail simplification of the control of the financial side, an emphasis on the scientific-technical side and peer review based on excellence.
Povezan, pregleden in usklajen sistem profesionalnega medsebojnega pregleda, ki se opira na odličnost, bi moral biti najpomembnejše merilo za oceno, kot je v primeru sistema ocenjevanja Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta.
Indeed, a coherent, transparent and harmonised professional peer review system that uses excellence should be the most important criterion for evaluation, as is the case with the ERC evaluation system.
Nazadnje je treba uporabo nagrad spodbujati v razumni meri.
Finally, the use of prizes should be encouraged within reason.
Vendar pa uporaba nagrad kot sredstva financiranja raziskav ne sme nadomestiti strukturnega financiranja.
However, the use of prizes as a means of funding research should not take the place of structured financing.
(b) Optimalna izraba časa
b) Optimising Time
Vse stopnje postopka je treba optimizirati, da se izognemo zamudam in spodbudimo stroškovno učinkovitost.
All stages of the process should be optimised to avoid delay and encourage cost effectiveness.
To vključuje dostop do osnutkov delovnih programov, objavo razpisa, oblikovanje osnutka predloga, izbirni postopek in čas, ki je potreben za odobritev in plačilo nepovratnih sredstev.
This involves the access to draft Work Programmes, call publication, drafting the proposal, the selection procedure and the time taken to approve grants and to pay.
Skrajšanje časa za dodelitev bi bilo zelo dobrodošlo.
Reduction in time-to-grant is very much welcome.
Vendar ima poročevalka velike zadržke do predloga Komisije o ukinitvi zahteve, da mora država članica zagotoviti mnenja o odločitvah o izbiri.
However, the rapporteur has strong reservations about the Commission proposal to remove the requirement for Member States to provide opinions on selection decisions.
Pomembno je, da imajo države članice možnost pregleda, zlasti pri raziskavah na področju varnosti in obrambe ter v primerih etičnega ovrednotenja projektov.
It is important that Member States have the power of scrutiny, especially in security and defence research and in cases of ethical evaluation of projects.
Komisija predlaga splošnejšo uporabo dvostopenjskih predlogov.
The Commission proposes a more generalized use of two-stage proposals.
Dvostopenjska vloga bo zmanjšala breme sestavljanja celotnih predlogov, utegne pa tudi povečati trajanje in zapletenost postopka predložitve.
Two-stage submission will reduce the burden of drafting full proposals but may also increase the length and complexity of the submission process.
Zato poročevalka podpira dvostopenjski postopek prijave, če je ocenjevanje na prvi stopnji temeljito, kar bi tudi zmanjšalo stroške prijave.
Therefore, the rapporteur supports the two-stage application procedure provided that evaluation is undertaken thoroughly in the initial stage.
(c) Premik k pristopu, ki je glede dostopnosti usmerjen k uporabniku
c) Shifting to a ‘ user-centred ’ approach in terms of access
Poročevalka meni, da je boljši dostop do programa in podpore uporabnikom mogoče doseči z izboljšanjem gradiva za smernice (manj žargona in bolj dosledna uporaba terminologije).
The rapporteur considers that a better access to the program and user support can be achieved by improving the guidance material (less jargon and more consistency in terminology).
To je mogoče storiti z optimiziranjem sistemov informacijske tehnologije, podpiranjem projektnega upravljanja in posebej prilagojene podpore uradnika EU za projekte (isti uradnik za projekte za ves čas poteka projekta).
This can be done by optimizing the IT-systems, supporting project management and by through personalized support by the EU Project Officer (maintain the same project officer throughout the lifetime of the project).
Isto platformo bi morale uporabljati vse službe in agencije Evropske komisije.
The same platform should be used across all E. C. services and Agencies.
Sinergija programov in instrumentov
Synergy of programmes and instruments
Poročevalka pozdravlja zavzetost Komisije, da zagotovi enotno razlago ter uporabo pravil in postopkov pri vseh programih in instrumentih.
The rapporteur welcomes the commitment of the Commission to ensuring uniform interpretation and application of rules and procedures across all programs and instruments.
Poleg tega se morajo v vseh generalnih direktoratih in agencijah Evropske komisije ter skupnih podjetjih, ki izvajajo skupne tehnološke pobude, pravila izvajati enotno.
Moreover the implementation of the rules across the four European Commission Directorates-General and Agencies as well as the Joint Undertakings implementing the JTIs should be uniform.
Poročevalka pa toplo priporoča različne nize pravil za raziskovalne centre in univerze ter za industrije, pa spet za mala in srednja podjetja.
However, the rapporteur strongly recommends a different set of rules for research centres and universities and then for industry and again for SMEs.
Manj zapleteni programi EU in z njimi povezani instrumenti bodo pripomogli k doseganju optimalne sinergije zaradi vzajemnega delovanja.
The reduction of complexity in EU programs and associated instruments will contribute to achieving optimised of synergies as a result of their combined action.
Zaželeno je tudi, da se oblikuje mehanizem skupnih smernic v Komisiji (usposabljanje uradnikov za projekte ter uvedba mesta mediatorja okvirnega programa).
It is also desirable to construct common guidance mechanism within the Commission (training of project officers and auditors and creation of a FP mediator).
Poročevalka meni, da je poenostavitev upravljanja ena od najbolj prednostnih nalog za prihodnji okvirni program.
The rapporteur considers the simplification of the administration as one of the highest priorities for the forthcoming FP.
Poleg tega so za prestrukturiranje finančnega okvira za raziskave zelo pomembni revizija finančne uredbe, kadrovski predpisi in izvajanje za raziskave specifičnega dopustnega tveganja za napake.
Furthermore, the revision of the Financial Regulation, the Staff Regulation and the implementation of a research-specific Tolerable Risk of Errors (TRE) are of major importance in restructuring the Research financing framework.
Poročevalka obenem poziva Komisijo, naj oceni posamezne instrumente in poveča usklajenost med njimi, hkrati pa ohrani dovolj prilagodljivosti, da ohrani posebnosti projektov, ki izhajajo iz njihovega obsega.
At the same time, the rapporteur invites the Commission to assess individual instruments and to increase the coordination between them, whilst maintaining enough flexibility to accommodate project specificities according to their size.
Poročevalka meni, da so inovacije rezultat učinkovitega in ustrezno financiranega sistema izobraževanja in raziskav skupaj z okvirnimi pogoji, kot so primerna politika pravic intelektualne lastnine, razpoložljivost tveganega kapitala, odprti trgi in pametni predpisi.
The rapporteur considers that innovation is the result of an efficient and appropriately funded education and research system together with framework conditions, such as an adequate IPR policy, the existence of venture capital, open markets and smart regulation.
Zato je pomembno, da se v okvirnem programu upošteva celotna veriga inovacij od pionirskih raziskav do uporabnih raziskav, tehnoloških demonstracijskih projektov, razširjanja in vrednotenja rezultatov.
Therefore, it is important that the Framework Programme takes into consideration the whole chain of innovation from frontier research, to applied research, technological demonstration, dissemination and valorisation of results.
Poročevalka podpira sistem financiranja, ki temelji na znanosti, ter uravnoteženo ločevanje med usmerjanimi raziskavami od zgoraj navzdol, usmerjenimi k učinkom, ter neusmerjanimi raziskavami od spodaj navzgor, usmerjenimi v znanost, kot podlago za osmi okvirni program.
The rapporteur supports a science-based funding system and a well balanced division between directed, top down, impact-driven and non-directed, bottom-up, science-driven research as the basis for FP8.
o poenostavitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov
on simplifying the implementation of framework programmes for research
Odbor za proračunski nadzor poziva odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, kot pristojni odbor, naj v predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgetary Control calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. obžaluje izredno povečanje števila raziskovalnih organizacij, modelov sodelovanja in mehanizmov upravljanja, pa tudi zapletenost, ki izhaja iz tega in proračunskemu organu povzroča težave s preglednostjo ter ustvarja razlike v obravnavanju upravičencev;
Regrets the extreme multiplication of research bodies, cooperation models and management mechanisms and the resultant complexity, which creates problems of transparency in relation to the budgetary authority and differences in the treatment of beneficiaries;
6. vztraja, naj Komisija pri pripravi prihodnjega okvirnega programa predloži ambiciozne predloge za vzpostavitev sistema financiranja, ki bo temeljil na rezultatih in znanstvenih dosežkih, ne pa toliko na vnosih in stroških, pri tem pa zagotovi, da inovativni načini uporabe ne bodo ogroženi; poudarja, da znanstveni pristop ni v nasprotju z zahtevami proračunskega nadzora;
Insists that the Commission, in its preparations for the next FP, should put forward a set of ambitious proposals aimed at establishing a financing system that is based on scientific results and performance, rather than on inputs and costs, whilst ensuring that innovative applications are not deterred; stresses that this science-based approach does not run counter to budgetary control requirements;
Marta Andreasen, Jean-Pierre Audy, Inés Ayala Sender, Zigmantas Balčytis, Luigi de Magistris, Tamás Deutsch, Martin Ehrenhauser, Jens Geier, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ville Itälä, Bogusław Liberadzki, Monica Luisa Macovei, Jan Olbrycht, Aldo Patriciello, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Georgios Stavrakakis (Georgios Stavrakakis), Søren Bo Søndergaard
Marta Andreasen, Jean-Pierre Audy, Inés Ayala Sender, Zigmantas Balčytis, Luigi de Magistris, Tamás Deutsch, Martin Ehrenhauser, Jens Geier, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ville Itälä, Bogusław Liberadzki, Monica Luisa Macovei, Jan Olbrycht, Aldo Patriciello, Theodoros Skylakakis, Georgios Stavrakakis, Søren Bo Søndergaard
Pripravljavec mnenja: Alain Cadec
Rapporteur: Alain Cadec
5. meni, da bi se morali različni instrumenti Evropske unije za kohezijo, raziskave in inovacije v skrbi za večjo učinkovitost izvajati integralno; poudarja, da je med temi instrumenti treba iskati sinergije ter odpraviti ovire za te sinergije, zlasti z uskladitvijo predpisov o revizijskem pregledu in določb o upravičenosti stroškov, da bi upravičencem olajšali njihovo izvajanje;
Is of the opinion that the EU’s various instruments for cohesion, research and innovation should be implemented in an integrated manner with a view to ensuring their effectiveness; emphasises the need to seek synergies between these instruments and to eliminate obstacles to such synergies, in particular by harmonising the rules on audits and eligibility of costs in order to simplify implementation by beneficiaries;
François Alfonsi, Haralampos Angurakis (Charalampos Angourakis), Catherine Bearder, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hjusmenova (Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova), Seán Kelly, Constanze Angela Krehl, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Georgios Stavrakakis, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
François Alfonsi, Charalampos Angourakis, Catherine Bearder, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Seán Kelly, Constanze Angela Krehl, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Georgios Stavrakakis, Csanád Szegedi, Nuno Teixeira, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal
o letnem poročilu o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2009
on the annual report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2009
Poročevalka: Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva)
Rapporteur: Mariya Nedelcheva
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2009,
– having regard to the annual report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2009,
– ob upoštevanju tretjega odstavka člena 24 in člena 228 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
– having regard to Article 24, third paragraph, and Article 228 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. oktobra 2005 z naslovom „Pooblastilo za sprejetje in posredovanje sporočil evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in za nastop javnih uradnikov pred njim” ( SEK(2005)1227 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s communication of 5 October 2005 entitled ‘Empowerment to adopt and transmit communications to the European Ombudsman and authorise civil servants to appear before the European Ombudsman’ ( SEC(2005)1227 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the European Ombudsman’s activities,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A7-0275/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0275/2010 ),
A. ker je bilo letno poročilo o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2009 uradno posredovano predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta dne 19. aprila 2010 in ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamanduros predstavil svoje poročilo Odboru za peticije 4. maja 2010 v Bruslju,
A. whereas the annual report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2009 was formally submitted to the President of Parliament on 19 April 2010 and the Ombudsman, Mr Nikiforos Diamandouros, presented the report to the Committee on Petitions in Brussels on 4 May 2010,
B. ker člen 24 PDEU določa, da se ima vsak državljan Unije „pravico pritožiti pri varuhu človekovih pravic, imenovanem v skladu s členom 228”,
B. whereas Article 24 of the TFEU lays down that ‘every citizen of the Union may apply to the Ombudsman established in accordance with Article 228’,
C. ker ima po členu 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah „vsakdo ... pravico, da institucije in organi Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku”,
C. whereas, under Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, ‘every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union’,
D. ker člen 43 listine določa, da ima vsaka državljanka in vsak državljan Unije ter vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic pravico, da se glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij ali organov Skupnosti obrne na varuha človekovih pravic, razen glede Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje v njuni pravosodni funkciji,
D. whereas Article 43 of the Charter states that ‘any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role’,
E. ker skupna zunanja in varnostna politika in dejavnosti Evropskega sveta z začetkom veljavnosti PDEU sodijo med pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic,
E. whereas, since the TFEU entered into force, the common foreign and security policy and the activities of the European Council have fallen within the remit of the Ombudsman,
F. ker po členu 228 PDEU Evropski parlament varuha človekovih pravic ne imenuje, temveč ga izvoli „po vsakih volitvah v Evropski parlament za mandatno dobo parlamenta”,
F. whereas pursuant to Article 228 of the TFEU the Ombudsman is now ‘elected after each election of the European Parliament for the duration of its term of office’ and no longer ‘appointed’ by the Parliament,
G. ker delo varuha človekovih pravic prispeva k oblikovanju Unije, v kateri se odločitve sprejemajo „v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani”, kot je opredeljeno v členu 1(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
G. whereas the work of the Ombudsman contributes towards a Union ‘in which decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen’, as provided for in Article 1, second paragraph, of the Treaty on European Union,
H. ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2009 zabeležil 3098 pritožb v primerjavi s 3406 pritožbami leta 2008, za 727 pritožb (23 %) v primerjavi s 802 pritožbami v letu 2008 pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile v pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic,
H. whereas the Ombudsman registered 3098 complaints in 2009 compared to 3406 in 2008, and whereas 727 complaints (23 %) compared to 802 in 2008 were found to be within his mandate,
J. ker so v 179 primerih, zaključenih leta 2009 (56 % vseh primerov), zadevne institucije sprejele sporazumno rešitev ali zadevo rešile, kar kaže na veliko pripravljenost institucij in organov Evropske unije, da pritožbe, naslovljene na varuha, vidijo kot priložnost za popravo storjenih napak in sodelovanje z njim v korist državljanov,
J. whereas in 179 cases (56 % of the total) closed in 2009, the institution concerned accepted a friendly solution or settled the matter, which shows a strong willingness on the part of the institutions and bodies to see complaints to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to remedy mistakes that have occurred and to cooperate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of citizens,
K. ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2009 ugotovil nepravilnosti v 12 % primerov (37 preiskav) in izrekel kritično oceno v 35 primerih,
K. whereas in 2009 the Ombudsman found maladministration to have been committed in 12 % of cases (37 inquiries), giving rise to critical remarks in 35 cases,
L. ker je bilo leta 2009 izdanih 15 osnutkov priporočil,
L. whereas 15 draft recommendations were issued in 2009,
M. ker se obtožbe o nepravilnostih najpogosteje nanašajo na pomanjkanje preglednosti, vključno z zavračanjem posredovanja informacij (36 % preiskav), nepravičnost ali zlorabo pooblastil (14 %), nepotrebne zamude (13 %), kršitve postopka (13 %), malomarnost (6 %), neizpolnjevanje dolžnosti Komisije v njeni vlogi varuha pogodb (6 %), pravne napake (6 %) in diskriminacijo (5 %),
M. whereas the most common types of alleged maladministration were lack of transparency, including refusal of information (36 % of inquiries), injustice or abuse of power (14 %), avoidable delays (13 %), procedural errors (13 %), negligence (6 %), failure by the Commission to fulfil its duty to act as the guardian of the Treaties (6 %), legal errors (6 %) and discrimination (5 %),
N. ker se je povprečni čas obravnavanja pritožb skrajšal s 13 mesecev v letu 2008 na 9 mesecev v letu 2009, kar priča o prizadevanjih varuha človekovih pravic za skrajšanje časa preiskav in o duhu sodelovanja med institucijami,
N. whereas the average time taken to consider complaints fell from 13 months in 2008 to 9 months in 2009, which bears witness to the Ombudsman’s efforts to shorten the average length of his inquiries and the spirit of cooperation of the institutions concerned,
O. ker ni bilo v letu 2009 za noben primer nepravilnosti napisano posebno poročilo za Evropski parlament,
O. whereas no case of maladministration led to a special report to the European Parliament in 2009,
P. ker kritične ocene in priporočila varuha človekovih pravic niso pravno zavezujoča, vendar naj bi spodbujala samonadzor institucij in organov Unije, da bi se izognili napakam in neustreznemu delovanju v prihodnje,
P. whereas the critical remarks and recommendations of the Ombudsman are not legally binding but have the aim of encouraging self-monitoring by the institutions and bodies of the European Union and may serve as a basis for avoiding a repetition of errors and malfunctions in future,
Q. ker se je vloga varuha človekovih pravic od njegove ustanovitve do danes razvila zahvaljujoč njegovi neodvisnosti in demokratičnemu nadzoru, ki ga nad njegovimi dejavnostmi izvajata Parlament in Odbor za peticije,
Q. whereas the role of the Ombudsman has evolved since the office was created, thanks to the Ombudsman’s independence and the democratic scrutiny of his activities performed by Parliament and the Committee on Petitions,
R. ker je bistveno, da institucije in organi EU v celoti izkoristijo sredstva, potrebna za izpolnitev svojih obveznosti, zato da dobijo državljani hitre in izčrpne odgovore na svoja vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije,
R. whereas it is essential that the European institutions and bodies make full use of the necessary resources in order to fulfil their obligation to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions,
S. ker je Parlament z resolucijo dne 6. septembra 2001
S. whereas Parliament adopted the Ombudsman’s Code of Good Administrative Behaviour in its resolution of 6 September 2001
T. ker evropska mreža varuhov človekovih pravic omogoča, da se pritožnike napoti na druge varuhe človekovih pravic ali podobne organe, ki bodo lahko na svoji ravni nudili ustreznejšo pomoč, ter omogoča izmenjavo informacij in dobrih praks,
T. whereas the European Network of Ombudsmen makes it possible to redirect complainants to the ombudsmen or other similar bodies which are expected to provide the assistance most appropriate to their level and to exchange information and good practices,
U. ker se dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic in Odbora za peticije dopolnjujejo, s čimer se krepi učinkovitost posameznih nalog,
U. whereas the work of the Ombudsman and that of the Committee on Petitions are complementary and promote greater effectiveness of their respective work,
3. je zadovoljen, da Listina o človekovih pravicah, ki je odslej pravno zavezujoča, z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe uvršča pravico do dobrega upravljanja med temeljne pravice, ki izhajajo iz državljanstva Unije; zato poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj bo pri vsakodnevni obravnavi pritožb pozoren na spoštovanje te listine;
Welcomes the fact that, with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is now legally binding, defines the right to good administration as one of the fundamental rights vested in citizens of the Union; calls therefore on the Ombudsman, in his everyday consideration of complaints, to enforce the Charter of Fundamental Rights;