natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
88. poziva k poenostavitvi načrtovanja in upravljanja programov v drugem stebru na vseh ravneh, da bi povečali učinkovitost; poziva k še bolj preprostim, učinkovitim in uspešnim sistemom za spremljanje, ocenjevanje in poročanje ukrepov navzkrižne skladnosti; meni, da je treba s podobnimi predpisi in postopki uskladiti nadzor in spremljanje za prvi in drugi steber ter ju bolj povezati, da bi zmanjšali celotno breme nadzora za kmete; poziva k bolj prožnemu upravljanju petletnega ciljnega obdobja za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe;
Calls for a simplification at all levels of programme planning and management in the second pillar in order to boost efficiency; calls further for simplified, effective and efficient systems for the monitoring, evaluation and reporting of cross-compliance measures; believes that checks and monitoring for the first and second pillars should be harmonised and made more coherent, with similar rules and procedures, to reduce the overall burden of checks on farmers; calls for more flexible operation of the five-year commitment period for agri-environmental measures;
91. pozdravlja premik v smeri večjega usklajevanja na ravni EU zlasti med programi za razvoj podeželja in kohezijsko politiko, da bi preprečili podvajanje, protislovne cilje in prekrivanje; vendar opozarja, da je obseg projektov v okviru kohezijske politike EU in programov za razvoj podeželja različen, in zato priporoča, da ostanejo sredstva ločena in da programi za razvoj podeželja ohranijo poudarek na podeželskih skupnostih in se ohranijo kot politično neodvisni instrumenti;
Welcomes the move towards greater coordination at EU level between rural development programmes and cohesion policy in particular, with a view to avoiding duplication, contradictory objectives and overlapping; recalls, however, that the scale of the projects under EU cohesion policy and rural development programmes is different and therefore advocates that the funds remain distinct and that rural development programmes maintain their focus on rural communities and be preserved as politically autonomous instruments;
93. poudarja pomen politik za spodbujanje čezmejnega sodelovanja med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, da bi uvedli prakse za varovanje okolja in zagotovili trajnost naravnih virov v primerih, ko imajo kmetijske dejavnosti, predvsem poraba vode, čezmejne posledice;
Stresses the importance of policies designed to encourage cross-border cooperation between Member States and third countries with a view to the adoption of practices to protect the environment and ensure the sustainability of natural resources in cases where farming activities, in particular the use of water, have cross-border implications;
Pripravljavec mnenja: Kriton Arsenis
Rapporteur: <Depute>Kriton Arsenis
A. ker 40 % svetovnih emisij toplogrednih plinov nastane v kmetijskem sektorju; ker je kmetijstvo glavni vir metana in dušikovega oksida, oba toplogredna plina pa imata veliko večji potencial za segrevanje ozračja kot ogljikov dioksid; in ker podnebne spremembe prizadenejo zlasti revne ljudi v državah v razvoju in zmanjšujejo možnosti za kmetovanje,
Recital A. Whereas 40% of the global greenhouse gases are emitted in the agriculture sector; whereas agriculture is the main source of methane and nitrous oxide, and both of these greenhouse gases have a much larger warming potential than carbon dioxide; and whereas climate change affects especially poor people in developing countries and diminish farming opportunities;
B. ker 70 % do 80 % podhranjenega prebivalstva predstavljajo podeželski prebivalci v državah v razvoju; in ker je izkoreninjenje skrajne revščine in lakote odvisno od izboljšanja življenjskih pogojev kmetov in kmetijskih delavcev v državah v razvoju,
Recital B. Whereas rural inhabitant in developing countries account for between 70% and 80% of the undernourished; and whereas eradicating extreme poverty and hunger is dependent on improving the living conditions of farmers and agricultural workers in developing countries;
C. ker poročilo posebnega poročevalca ZN za pravico do hrane „Agroekologija in pravica do hrane“ kaže, da lahko agroekologija v desetih letih podvoji proizvodnjo hrane v celotnih regijah ter istočasno ublaži podnebne spremembe in zmanjša revščino na podeželju; priznava, da sta dolgoročna produktivnost in prehranska varnost, zlasti odpornost kmetijskih sistemov na podnebne motnje, odvisni od skrbi za naravne vire, predvsem prst, rabo vode in biološko raznolikost;
Recital C. Whereas the report by the UN special rapporteur for the right to food "Agroecology and the Right to Food” shows that agroecology can double food production in entire regions within 10 years while mitigating climate change and alleviating rural poverty; recognizes that long term productivity and food security, especially resilience of agricultural systems to climatic disturbances, depends on due care for natural resources, particularly soil, water use and biodiversity;
2. poziva EU, naj zagotovi skladnost skupne kmetijske politike in svoje razvojne in trgovinske politike; zlasti poudarja potrebo po zaščitnih klavzulah v trgovinskih sporazumih in pravico držav v razvoju, da zaščitijo svoje kmetijske trge;
Calls for the EU to ensure consistency between the CAP and its development and trade policies; in particular underlines the need for safeguard clauses in trade agreements and the right for developing countries to protect their agricultural markets;
5. meni, da ima SKP pomembno vlogo v zvezi z razvojno politiko, predvsem na področju zanesljivosti preskrbe s hrano; opozarja, da lahko SKP prispeva k obvladovanju povečanega svetovnega povpraševanja po živilih;
Considers that the CAP plays an important role in relation to development policy, particularly in the area of food security; points out that the CAP has a contribution to make to meeting increased world demand for food;
9. z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je odvisnost EU od uvožene živalske krme, zlasti soje, prispevala k rastočemu povpraševanju po zemlji v tujini, kar vodi v krčenje gozdov, preseljevanje skupnosti in širitev genetsko spremenjene soje v Južni Ameriki; v skladu s tem poziva Komisijo, naj zmanjša odvisnost od uvožene beljakovinske krme, in sicer z razvojem in širitvijo sonaravnih stročnic v EU, kar je ena od njenih glavnih prednostnih nalog;
Notes with concern that EU dependence on imported animal feed, particularly soy, has contributed to the growing demand for land abroad, leading to deforestation, the displacement of communities and an expansion of genetically modified soy in South America; accordingly, calls on the Commission to make the reduction of dependency of imported protein feed, i.e. through development and expansion of sustainable protein crops in the EU, one of its main priority;
12. poziva Komisijo, naj izvede podrobno oceno učinka vseh trgovinskih pogajanj, ki so v teku, zlasti Pridružitvenega sporazuma EU-Mercosur, ki ne sme negativno vplivati na države v razvoju in ovirati učinkovitosti SKP proti letu 2020;
Asks the Commission to provide a detailed impact assessment on all ongoing trade negotiations, in particular the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement, which should not negatively affect the developing countries and hinder the effectiveness of the CAP towards 2020.
14. poziva Evropsko unijo, naj zagotovi skladnost skupne kmetijske politike z razvojnimi in trgovinskimi politikami ob upoštevanju potreb in težav kmetov v državah članicah EU in v državah v razvoju ter hkratnem spoštovanju načela skladnosti politik za razvoj.
Calls for the European Union to ensure consistency between the CAP and its development and trade policies, while taking into account the needs and concerns of farmers in the EU Member States and in developing countries whilst respecting the principle of Policy Coherence for Development
Thijs Berman, Corina Creţu, Véronique De Keyser, Nirj Deva, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Ivo Vajgl, Anna Záborská, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
Thijs Berman, Corina Creţu, Véronique De Keyser, Nirj Deva, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Theocharous, Ivo Vajgl, Anna Záborská, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
Pripravljavka mnenja: Karin Kadenbach
Rapporteur: Karin Kadenbach
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Agriculture, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. meni, da je nujno najti pravo ravnovesje med potrebo po povečani produktivnosti, ki zahteva intenzivne metode proizvodnje, in potrebo po ohranjanju in trajnostni uporabi virov, ki spoštuje okolje, javno zdravje in dobro počutje živali;
Considers it necessary to strike the correct balance between the need for increased productivity requiring intensive production methods and the need for the conservation and sustainable use of resources, showing due regard for the environment, public health and animal welfare;
21. pozdravlja možnost Komisije, da politično odgovori na ekonomske, okoljske in socialne izzive EU ter poveča prispevek kmetijstva in podeželja k cilju Evrope 2020 za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast;
Welcomes the Commission’s policy option, which would address the EU’s economic, environmental and social challenges and strengthen the contribution of agriculture and rural areas to the Europe 2020 objective of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth;
23. poudarja, da je kmetijski sektor le eden izmed sektorjev, ki prispevajo h gospodarskemu razvoju podeželskih območij; zato poziva k širši uporabi kmetijskih skladov, da bi se preprečila osiromašenost podeželskih območij; poudarja, da lahko tudi sama narava pospeši gospodarski razvoj, na primer s privabljanjem turizma;
Points out that the agricultural sector is only one of the sectors which contributes to the economic development of rural areas; calls, therefore, for a broader use of agricultural funds in order to combat the impoverishment of rural areas; points out that nature can also boost economic development, for instance by attracting tourism;
25. meni, da morajo ukrepi za razvoj podeželja dopolnjevati dobre kmetijske prakse, ki so podprte v okviru prvega stebra, in spodbujati prakse, ki dosledno prispevajo k ciljem boja proti podnebnim spremembam in dobrega upravljanja z naravnimi viri, kot je varovanje biotske raznovrstnosti, vode in prsti;
Considers that rural development measures must complement the good agricultural practices supported under the first pillar and promote practices which contribute consistently to the objectives of the fight against climate change and the sound management of natural resources, such as the protection of biodiversity, water and soil;
31. poudarja pomen politik za spodbujanje čezmejnega sodelovanja med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, da bi se sprejele prakse za varovanje okolja in zagotovila trajnost naravnih virov v primerih, ko imajo kmetijske dejavnosti, predvsem poraba vode, čezmejne posledice;
Stresses the importance of policies designed to encourage cross-border cooperation between Member States and third countries with a view to the adoption of practices to protect the environment and ensure the sustainability of natural resources in cases where farming activities, in particular the use of water, have cross-border implications;
34. meni, da bi morala sedanji sistem nadomestiti enostavna in posebna shema pomoči za male kmetije, da bi se tako povečala njihova konkurenčnost in priznal njihov prispevek k vitalnosti podeželskih območij in k varstvu okolja;
Considers that a simple and specific support scheme for small farms should replace the current regime in order to enhance their competitiveness and acknowledge their contribution to the vitality of rural areas and to environmental protection;
41. meni, da bi morala skupna kmetijska politika izvesti splošno okoljsko presojo, s katero bi bilo mogoče določiti ključne težave, ki jih je treba spremeniti z namenom varovanja voda, vključno z učinkom odvečnega fosforja, ki povzroča evtrofikacijo in povečano nagnjenost k evtrofikaciji v vodnih ekosistemih, kot je Baltsko morje;
Considers that the CAP should undergo a general environmental assessment, through which the key issues which need to be changed in order to protect bodies of water could be determined, including the role of excess phosphorous triggering eutrophication and increased susceptibility to eutrophication in aquatic ecosystems such as the Baltic;
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Sophie Auconie, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sergio Berlato, Milan Cabrnoch, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Esther de Lange, Anne Delvaux, Bas Eickhout, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Julie Girling, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Gilles Pargneaux, Antonija Parvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Bogusław Sonik, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Salvatore Tatarella, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Sophie Auconie, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sergio Berlato, Milan Cabrnoch, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Esther de Lange, Anne Delvaux, Bas Eickhout, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Julie Girling, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Gilles Pargneaux, Antonyia Parvanova, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Theodoros Skylakakis, Bogusław Sonik, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Salvatore Tatarella, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils
Margrete Auken, Tadeusz Cymański, Matthias Groote, Riikka Manner, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bart Staes, Marianne Thyssen, Michailis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Anna Záborská
Margrete Auken, Tadeusz Cymański, Matthias Groote, Riikka Manner, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bart Staes, Marianne Thyssen, Michail Tremopoulos, Anna Záborská
Pripravljavec mnenja: Jens Rohde
Rapporteur: Jens Rohde
2. poudarja, da kmetijski, gozdarski in ribiški sektor prispevajo 355 milijard EUR v gospodarstvo EU in predstavljajo 8,6 % vseh delovnih mest v EU, saj ti sektorji zagotavljajo hrano, obenem pa imajo pomembno vlogo kot vir nemineralnih surovin, ki so potrebne za delovanje številnih industrijskih panog; ugotavlja, da je to prva reforma skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) v EU s 27 državami članicami in da je pomembna za spodbujanje ohranitve kmetijstva po različnih evropskih državah in ozemljih, pri tem pa se je treba izogniti poskusom ponovne nacionalizacije skupne politike; poudarja, da mora nova SKP vzpostaviti pošteno in uravnoteženo porazdelitev med državami članicami;
Emphasizes that the agricultural, forestry and fisheries sector contributes with 355 billion euros to the EU economy and represents 8.6 percent of the total EU employment as the sector is not only providing foods, but also plays an important role as a source of non-mineral raw materials necessary for the functioning of many industries; notes that this is the first CAP reform in an EU of 27 Member States and that it is important, in order to encourage the continuance of agriculture in the various European countries and territories, whilst avoiding any attempt to renationalise what is a common policy; stresses that the new CAP must create a fair and balanced distribution among the Member States;
4. poudarja, da je treba v prihodnjem programskem obdobju opredeliti finančna sredstva, ki bodo ustrezala novim ciljem SKP, ali vsaj obdržati sedanji proračun;
Stresses the need to establish an appropriate level of funding commensurate with the new CAP objectives, or at least maintain current budget appropriations for the next programming period;
6. v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da je biotehnologija nove generacije že na voljo; zatorej poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru reforme SKP oblikuje medsektorsko politiko za biomaso za biotehnologijo nove generacije, vključno s trajnostnimi merili za biomaso, da bo omogočila razvoj trajnostnega trga za biomaso iz kmetijstva, živilsko-predelovalnih podjetij in gozdarstva, in sicer tako, da spodbuja zbiranje razpoložljivih ostankov za proizvodnjo bioenergije, hkrati pa preprečuje porast emisij in izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti;
In this regard notes that next-generation bio-technology is ready now and therefore urges the Commission to develop a cross-sectoral biomass policy for next-generation bio-technology including sustainability criteria for biomass as part of the reform of the CAP to enable the development of a sustainable market for biomass from agriculture, agro industrial enterprises and forestry by incentivising the collection of available residue for bioenergy production, whilst preventing an increase in emissions and a loss of biodiversity;
10. predlaga, da bi bilo treba zeleno komponento zasnovati tako, da bodo kmetje upravičeni do dodatne podpore, če ponujajo okoljske javne dobrine, ki pomenijo dodano vrednost za EU in ki so pomembne za vse države članice, vendar zanje niso poplačani s strani trga, na primer travna ruša, kolobarjenje in določitev območij brez škropljenja; poudarja, da mora zelena komponenta kmetom zagotoviti prožnost in izbiro, da bo ohranjen njen namen v smislu zagotavljanja poslovnih priložnosti in spodbud;
Suggests that the greening component should be designed in a way where farmers will be entitled to additional support if they provide environmental public goods that constitute added value for the EU and that are relevant in all Member States but for which they are not rewarded by the market such as green cover, crop rotation and establishment of no-spray zones; highlights the necessity of the greening component to provide flexibility and choice for the farmer to ensure its purpose as a business opportunity and incentive-tool;
13. poudarja, da mora zelena komponenta upoštevati različne potrebe, izzive in izhodiščne točke držav članic, da bodo vsem kmetom zagotovljene enake možnosti koriščenja zelene komponente; zato meni, da bi bilo treba omogočiti, da bodo že izvajani zeleni elementi upoštevani;
Stresses that the greening component must take the different needs, challenges and starting points of the Member States into account to ensure that all farmers will have equal opportunities of receiving the greening component; therefore already initiated greening elements should be allowed to be taken into account;
16. poudarja, da SKP ne bi smela ustvarjati razlik med spoloma ter da bi morala imeti oba zakonca pri delu v podjetju enake pravice; poudarja, da je od 26,7 milijona oseb, ki redno delajo v kmetijskem sektorju v Evropski uniji, 42 % žensk, da pa zgolj eno od petih kmetijskih gospodarstev (okrog 29 %) vodi ženska;
Stresses that the CAP should be gender neutral and that both spouses should be provided with the same rights when working in the business; highlights the fact that about 42% of the 26.7 million people working regularly in agriculture in the European Union are women, but that only one holding in five (around 29%) is managed by a woman;
18. v skrbi za socialno učinkovitost poziva k omejevanju pomoči glede na površino kmetij, da ne bi ovirali mehanizmov, ki spodbujajo prevzem starih in ustanavljanje novih kmetij.
Wishes a ceiling to be introduced for aid, based on the area of a holding, in the interests of social efficiency and in order to avoid counteracting schemes which assist the taking over of farms and start-ups by new farmers.
o skupni kmetijski politiki proti letu 2020: odziv na prihodnje izzive, povezane s hrano, naravnimi viri in ozemljem
on the CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future
3. pozornost namenja ugotovitvi, da pomenijo ukrepi za razvoj podeželja gospodarsko, socialno in infrastrukturno izboljšanje podeželja v celostnem smislu, zato jih ne smemo obravnavati na sektorski ravni;
Considers it important to state that rural development measures must be understood in a comprehensive rather than a sector-based way, as embracing the economic, social and infrastructural improvement of rural areas;
8. meni, da je zaradi trajnosti proizvodnih sistemov, proizvodnih sektorjev in območij, ki so strukturno najbolj prikrajšana in/ali jih je razvoj trga in politik najbolj prizadel, treba nujno zagotoviti ustrezno prožnost pri uporabi sistema neposrednih plačil s strani držav članic;
Considers it essential, in order to ensure the sustainability of production systems, productive sectors and the territories most affected by structural disadvantages and/or market and policy developments, to allow a degree of flexibility in the application of direct payments by the Member States;
10. ugotavlja, da so občinski organi z dejanskimi pristojnostmi na lokalni ali nadlokalni ravni jamstvo za uspešno vključevanje lokalne civilne družbe v smislu pristopa LEADER; opaža, da so lokalni organi v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije prva državna raven, s katero prihajajo v stik državljani, zato poziva, naj se z ukrepi za razvoj podeželja krepi sposobnost mestnih in podeželskih občin ter da bodo lahko ustrezni regionalni organi dejavno prispevali k razvoju na lokalni in nadlokalni ravni;
Points out that municipal authorities with real powers at local level or supra-local level provide a guarantee of successful participation by local civil society, in keeping with the Leader approach; notes that, in all the EU Member States, local authorities are the first tier of the state with which citizens come into contact and calls, therefore, for rural development measures to include provision for strengthening the capacity of urban and rural municipalities and for the relevant regional bodies actively to shape development at the local and supra-local levels;
12. meni, da je izredno pomembno čim bolj zmanjšati izkrivljanje konkurence na notranjem trgu, ki ga povzročajo neposredna plačila, ne le s čim obsežnejšim ločevanjem neposrednih plačil od obsega proizvodnje, ampak tudi z izenačevanjem stopenj izplačila med posameznimi regijami in državami članicami EU, zlasti za območja s podobno ali enako proizvodnjo;
Believes that it is extremely important to minimise the distorting effects of direct payments on competition in the single market, not merely by decoupling direct payments from production volumes as far as possible, but also by aligning payment rates between individual EU regions and Member States, and particularly between areas with similar or identical types of production;
16. meni, da je treba državam članicam omogočiti znižanje neposrednih plačil glede na velikost kmetij ali višino plačil, ki jih prejme kmetija, ter pri tem upoštevati prednosti, povezane z obsegom proizvodnje;
Considers that the Member States should have the possibility to reduce direct payments in line with farm size or the level of payments received by a given farm, taking into account the benefits resulting from the scale of production;