natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parlament ves čas vztraja, da je za začetek veljavnosti splošne prepovedi krmljenja potrebna varna predelava, sterilizacija in odstranjevanje odpadkov iz gostinskih dejavnosti (glej stališče Parlamenta v zakonodajnem postopku o sprejetju Uredbe št. 1774/2002 in njegovo stališče v prvi obravnavi o okvirni direktivi o odpadkih, sprejeti 13. februarja 2007).
Parliament has repeatedly insisted that a safe recovery, sterilisation and disposal of catering waste is needed in order to enforce the general feed ban (See EP position in the legislative procedure establishing Regulation No 1774/2002 and its position in the first reading of the waste framework directive, adopted on 13 February 2007).
Člen 20 – točka (e) – podtočka (ii)
Article 20 – point e – subpoint ii
(ii) v primeru gnoja, vsebine prebavnega trakta, ločene od prebavnega trakta , mleka, proizvodov iz mleka in kolostruma, za katere pristojni organ meni, da ne pomenijo tveganja za širjenje katere koli nevarne transmisivne bolezni, po predhodni predelavi ali brez nje;
(ii) in the case of manure, digestive tract content separated from the digestive tract , milk, milk-based products and colostrum, which the competent authority does not consider to present a risk for the spread of any serious transmissible disease, following or without prior processing;
Očiščen prebavni trakt, iz katerega je ločena vsebina, šteje za snov kategorije 3.
Separated and cleaned, the digestive tract should be classified as category 3 material.
Člen 22 – točka (e)
Article 22 – point e
(e) kadar gre za snovi kategorije 2 in kategorije 3 ter če pristojni organ dovoli:
(e) in the case of Category 2 and Category 3 material and if authorised by the competent authority:
(i) se uporabijo za pripravo biodinamičnih pripravkov za uporabo na zemljišču iz točke 2.3 dela A Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 2092/91;
(i) used for the preparation and application to land of bio-dynamic preparations as referred to in point 2.3 of Part A of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2092/91;
Veljavna Uredba 1774/2002/ES za predelano hrano hišnih živali dovoljuje le snovi kategorije 3.
The current Regulation 1774/2002/EC allows only category 3 material for processed pet food.
Dovoljenje za hranjenje hišnih živali z nepredelanimi snovmi kategorij 2 in 3 je v nasprotju s splošnimi načeli predpisov o živalskih stranskih proizvodih.
The permission to feed pet animals with unprocessed category 2 & 3 material is against the general principles of the animal by-products rules.
Vodi lahko tudi v goljufije, in sicer nenadzorovano usmerjanje teh nepredelanih snovi za nenamerno uporabo.
It is also liable to lead to fraud, i.e. uncontrolled channelling of such unprocessed material into unintended uses.
Namen je odstraniti sklicevanje na uporabo snovi kategorije 1 in 2 kot hrane za hišne živali.
The aim is to remove reference to the use of category 1 and 2 materials as petfood.
(ga) prevoza, predelave, uporabe ali odstranjevanja odpadkov iz gostinskih obratov; do sprejetja takih določb lahko države članice sprejmejo ali ohranijo nacionalna pravila za prevoz, predelavo, uporabo ali odstranjevanje odpadkov iz gostinskih obratov.
(ga) the transport, processing, use or disposal of catering waste; until such provisions are adopted, Member States may adopt or retain national rules on the transport, processing, use or disposal of catering waste.
Pristojni organ lahko z odstopanjem od oddelkov 1 in 2 ter v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v skladu z odstavkom 3 tega člena, dovoli snovi kategorije 1 iz člena 11(b)(ii) za krmljenje živali iz živalskih vrtov in ogroženih ali zaščitenih vrst ptic mrhovinark, ki živijo v svojem naravnem habitatu.
The competent authority may authorise, by way of derogation from Sections 1 and 2, and in accordance with conditions laid down pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article, the feeding of the Category 1 material referred to in Article 11(b)(ii) to zoo animals and to endangered or protected species of necrophagous birds living in their natural habitat.
Pristojni organ lahko z odstopanjem od oddelkov 1 in 2 ter v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v skladu z odstavkom 3 tega člena, dovoli snovi kategorije 1 iz člena 11(b)(ii) za krmljenje živali iz živalskih vrtov in ogroženih ali zaščitenih vrst, ki živijo v svojem naravnem habitatu.
The competent authority may authorise, by way of derogation from Sections 1 and 2, and in accordance with conditions laid down pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article, the feeding of the Category 1 material referred to in Article 11(b)(ii) to zoo animals and to endangered or protected species living in their natural habitat.
Ta oprostitev velja za hrano zaščitenih ali ogroženih vrst, ki jo opredeljujeta pomanjkanje hrane in upad populacij.
This exemption should concern the diet of protected or endangered species characterised by food shortages and falling populations.
Izvedbena pravila in zadevne vrste se opredelijo v skladu s členom 48(4) (Odbor).
The implementing rules and the species concerned shall be determined pursuant to Article 48(4) (Committee).
Člen 27 – odstavek 3 – točka (b) – podtočka (i)
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point b – subpoint i
i) vrste ptic mrhovinark v nekaterih državah članicah, v katerih se lahko krmijo s takšnimi snovmi;
i) the species of necrophagous birds in certain Member States to which such material may be fed;
Člen 28 – odstavek 1 – točka (c)
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) s sežiganjem ali zakopavanjem na kraju samem snovi kategorije 1 iz člena 11(b)(ii), snovi kategorije 2 in snovi kategorije 3 ali na druge načine pod uradnim nadzorom, ki preprečuje prenašanje tveganj v zvezi z javnim zdravjem in zdravstvenim varstvom živali, na območjih, na katerih je dostop praktično nemogoč ali bi bil dostop iz geografskih ali podnebnih razlogov ali zaradi naravne nesreče mogoč le v razmerah, ki pomenijo tveganje za zdravje in varnost osebja, ki bi takšne proizvode zbiralo, ali bi bili zaradi dostopa potrebni nesorazmerni načini predelave;
(c) by burning or burial on site or by other means under official supervision preventing the transmission of risks to public and animal health of Category 1 material referred to in Article 11(b)(ii), Category 2 material, and Category 3 material in areas where access is practically impossible or where access would only be possible under circumstances, related to geographical or climatic reasons or due to a natural disaster, which present risks to the health and safety of the personnel carrying out the collection or where access would necessitate the use of disproportionate means of recovery;
(c) s sežiganjem ali zakopavanjem na kraju samem snovi kategorije 1 iz člena 11(b)(ii), snovi kategorije 2 in snovi kategorije 3 ali na druge načine pod uradnim nadzorom, ki preprečuje prenašanje tveganj v zvezi z javnim zdravjem in zdravstvenim varstvom živali, na območjih, na katerih je dostop praktično nemogoč, kjer bi dostop pomenil nesorazmerno finančno ali upravno breme , ali bi bil dostop iz geografskih ali podnebnih razlogov ali zaradi naravne nesreče mogoč le v razmerah, ki pomenijo tveganje za zdravje in varnost osebja, ki bi takšne proizvode zbiralo, ali bi bili zaradi dostopa potrebni nesorazmerni načini predelave;
(c) by burning or burial on site or by other means under official supervision preventing the transmission of risks to public and animal health of Category 1 material referred to in Article 11(b)(ii), Category 2 material, and Category 3 material in areas where access is practically impossible , where access would impose a disproportionate financial or administrative burden or where access would only be possible under circumstances, related to geographical or climatic reasons or due to a natural disaster, which present risks to the health and safety of the personnel carrying out the collection or where access would necessitate the use of disproportionate means of recovery;
Člen 28 – odstavek 1 – točka (d)
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) z načini, ki niso sežiganje ali zakopavanje na kraju samem, pod uradnim nadzorom, snovi kategorije 2 in kategorije 3, ki ne pomenijo tveganje za javno zdravje in zdravstveno varstvo živali in ki nastanejo v prostorih upravljavcev, ki ravnajo samo z določeno količino takšnih živalskih stranskih proizvodov na teden v skladu s točko (c) prvega pododstavka odstavka 4 , glede na naravo izvajanih dejavnosti in živalske vrste izvora zadevnih živalskih stranskih proizvodov;
(d) by means other than burning or burial on site, under official supervision, of Category 2 and Category 3 materials which do not pose a risk to public and animal health and which arise at the premises of operators handling no more than a volume of such animal by-products arising per week, which is set in accordance with point (c) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 4, in relation to the nature of the activities carried out and the species of origin of the animal by-products concerned;
(d) z načini, ki vključujejo sežiganje ali zakopavanje na kraju samem, pod uradnim nadzorom, snovi kategorije 2 in kategorije 3, ki ne pomenijo tveganje za javno zdravje in zdravstveno varstvo živali in ki nastanejo v prostorih upravljavcev, ki ravnajo samo z določeno količino takšnih živalskih stranskih proizvodov na teden, določijo pa jo pristojni organi držav članic glede na naravo izvajanih dejavnosti in živalske vrste izvora zadevnih živalskih stranskih proizvodov;
(d) by means which include burning or burial on site, under official supervision, of Category 2 and Category 3 materials which do not pose a risk to public and animal health and which arise at the premises of operators handling no more than a volume of such animal by-products arising per week, which is determined by the competent authorities of the Member States, in relation to the nature of the activities carried out and the species of origin of the animal by-products concerned;
Za določitev največje količine za preprostejšo odstranitev so odgovorni pristojni organi držav članic.
The definition of maximum volumes subject to simplified disposal should be done under the responsibility of the competent authorities in the Member States.
Člen 28 – odstavek 1 – točka (e a) (novo)
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) brez poseganja v člen 15(1) lahko pristojni organi odobrijo ukrepe za začasno izoliranje živali in delov živali, ki ustrezajo opredelitvi iz člena 12(f), pod pogoji, ki preprečujejo tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali, pred njihovo odstranitvijo v skladu s členom 20 te uredbe;
(ea) without prejudice to article 15(1) competent authorities may authorise measures for the temporary containment of animals and parts of animals meeting the definition of Article 12(f) under conditions which prevent risks arising to public and animal health prior to their disposal in accordance with Article 20 of this Regulation;
Uvedba izoliranja povečuje prilagodljivost zbiranja živalskih stranskih proizvodov brez ogrožanja javnega zdravja in zdravja živali.
The introduction of containment increases the flexibility for collection of animal by-products without compromising public and animal health.
Ta prilagodljivost bo izboljšala trajnostnost in okoljski profil zbiranja živalskih stranskih proizvodov zaradi manjše pogostosti zbiranja in zbiranja morebiti manjših količin.
This flexibility will improve the sustainability and environmental profile of ABP collection due to reduced frequency of collection and possibly reduced volumes to be collected.
Obseg oddaljenih območij v posamezni državi članici iz odstavka 1(b) ne more preseči odstotka obsega površine njenega kopenskega ozemlja .
The size of the remote areas in a particular Member State referred to in paragraph 1(b) may not exceed a percentage of the size of the surface of its land territory .
Obseg oddaljenih območij v posamezni državi članici iz odstavka 1(b) ne more preseči odstotka, ki se določi na podlagi geografskih meril in števila glav živine na območju .
The size of the remote areas in a particular Member State referred to in paragraph 1(b) may not exceed a percentage, to be determined on the basis of geographical criteria and the area's livestock headcount .
Merilo na osnovi območja ne zadošča za razširitev opredelitve oddaljenih območij.
An area-based criterion is not sufficient for extending the definition of remote areas.
Upoštevati je treba tudi druge vidike, kot so gostota živali in otoška lega.
Other aspects, such as livestock density and island status, should also be taken into account.
(a) pogojev, katerih cilj je zagotoviti nadzor tveganj v zvezi z javnim zdravjem in zdravstvenim varstvom živali, za sežiganje in zakopavanje snovi na kraju samem ter začasno izoliranje živali in delov živali do odstranitve;
(a) conditions aimed at ensuring control of risks to public and animal health for burning and burial of material on site and the temporary containment of animals and parts of animals pending disposal ;
Člen 28 – odstavek 4 – točka (b)
Article 28 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) najvišjega odstotka ozemlja iz odstavka 2;
(b) the maximum percentage of the territory as referred to in paragraph 2;
Člen 28 – odstavek 4 – točka (c)
Article 28 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) količine živalskih stranskih proizvodov v povezavi z naravo dejavnosti in živalskimi vrstami izvora, določenega v odstavku 1(d);
(c) the volume of animal by-products, in relation to the nature of activities and the species of origin, as referred to in paragraph 1(d);
(c) meril za določanje količine živalskih stranskih proizvodov v povezavi z naravo dejavnosti in živalskimi vrstami izvora, določenega v odstavku 1(d);
(c) criteria for setting the volume of animal by-products, in relation to the nature of activities and the species of origin, as referred to in paragraph 1(d);
Vendar mora imeti Komisija možnost oblikovati usklajena merila za določanje teh količin.
However, the Commission should be entitled to develop harmonised criteria for setting these volumes.
Člen 30 – naslov
Article 30 – title
Uradni nadzor in smernice za dobro prakso
Official controls and guides to good practice
Uradni nadzor se izvaja nad celotno verigo živalskih stranskih proizvodov od kraja nastanka do obdelave, uporabe ali odstranjevanja.
The whole chain of animal by-products from the place of generation to treatment, use or disposal shall be subject to official controls.
Komisija zagotovi, da smernice za dobro prakso, oblikovane, potrjene in pregledane v skladu s poglavjem III Uredbe (ES) 183/2005 o zahtevah glede higiene krme, vključujejo praktična navodila glede zahtev te uredbe za zadevni sektor.
The Commission shall ensure that guides to good practice, developed, validated and reviewed in accordance with Chapter III of Regulation (EC) 183/2005 laying down requirements for feed hygiene, include practical guidance on the requirements of this Regulation for the sector concerned.
Smernice, potrjene v okviru uredbe 183/2005/ES, vsebujejo navodila za zadevni sektor in organe nadzora glede zbiranja in razlage zahtev na področju varnosti in analize tveganj in kritičnih nadzornih točk (HACCP) iz različnih zakonodaj EU.
Guides validated under Regulation 183/2005/EC provide guidance for the sector concerned and the control authorities regarding compilation and explanation of safety and HACCP requirements stemming from several EU legislations.
Te smernice so nujne za pravilno izvajanje zakonodaje Skupnosti, zlasti za mala in srednje velika podjetja, in učinkovit načina za samonadzor v obratih.
These Guides are an essential tool, in particular for small and medium sized enterprises, to correctly apply EU legislation and are an efficient tool for auto-control in plants.
The obligation to include the requirements of the animal by-products regulation into these Guides would complete the latter with an essential safety aspect of EU legislation.
The obligation to include the requirements of the animal by-products regulation into these Guides would complete the latter with an essential safety aspect of EU legislation.
Člen 31 – odstavek 1 – točka (b a) (novo)
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) uvede posebne pogoje za objekte in obrate, da se odpravijo obstoječe pomanjkljivosti.
(ba) impose specific conditions on plants and establishments in order to rectify existing deficiencies.
Poleg ustavitve ali umika odobritev morajo imeti pristojni organi tudi pristojnost, da odpravijo pomanjkljivosti in uvedejo pogoje.
In addition to the suspension or withdrawal of approvals, the competent authorities should also be given the power to rectify deficiencies and to impose conditions.
Vsaka država članica pripravi seznam objektov, obratov in uporabnikov, ki so bili odobreni ali registrirani v skladu s to uredbo, in obratov na njenem ozemlju, za katere so bile predložene informacije v skladu s členom 40(3).
Each Member State shall draw up a list of plants, establishments and users which have been approved or registered in accordance with this Regulation and of establishments on which information has been provided in accordance with Article 40(3) within its territory.
Vsaka država članica in podnacionalna vlada s pristojnimi pooblastili pripravi seznam objektov, obratov in uporabnikov, ki so bili odobreni ali registrirani v skladu s to uredbo, in obratov na njenem ozemlju, za katere so bile predložene informacije v skladu s členom 40(3).
Each Member State , and devolved sub-national government with competent powers, shall draw up a list of plants, establishments and users which have been approved or registered in accordance with this Regulation and of establishments on which information has been provided in accordance with Article 40(3) within its territory.
Komisija lahko odobri odstopanja od odstavkov 1 do 4 za odpremo gnoja ali snovi za bioenergijo, ki se prevaža med dvema točkama na isti kmetiji ali med kmetijami v obmejnih regijah držav članic s skupnimi mejami.
Derogations from paragraphs 1 to 4 may be granted by the Commission with respect to the dispatch of manure or material for bioenergy transported between two points located on the same farm or between farms located in the border regions of Member States sharing a common border.
Končni proizvodi se lahko dajo na trg brez omejitev.
Finished products may be placed on the market without restrictions.
Če na eni strani predlog predvideva tako imenovan "konec uporabe" pridobljenih proizvodov, namenjenih za nadaljnjo predelavo, obdelavo ali pretvorbo v specializiranih obratih (npr. kozmetični izdelki, zdravila itd.), bi bilo po drugi strani tako uporabo smiselno predvideti za končne proizvode, ki ne bodo več predelani, obdelani in pretvorjeni, ampak dani na trg v embalaži za prodajo, kot je na primer hrana za hišne živali, pridelana v skladu z varnostnimi zahtevami te uredbe.
Whilst the proposal foresees a so-called 'end of application' for derived products intended for further processing, treatment or transformation in specialized plants (e.g. cosmetic products, medicinal products…), it would only be logic to foresee such end of application for finished products which will not be further treated, transformed or processed, but which are put on the market in ready-to-sale packaging, such as pet food produced according to the safety requirements of the regulation.
o zagotavljanju kakovosti hrane - uskladitev ali vzajemno priznavanje standardov
on ensuring food quality: harmonisation or mutual recognition of standards
Magor Imre Csibi , Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
Magor Imre Csibi , Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
(*) Pridruženi odbor - člen 47 poslovnika
(*) Associated committee - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.....................................................3
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION...............................................3
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane (*) ..............16
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (*) 17
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION
– ob upoštevanju člena 33 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 33 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 15. oktobra 2008 o kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov: proizvodni standardi, zahteve za kmetovanje in sheme kakovosti ( KOM(2008)0641 končno)
– having regard to the Commission's Green Paper of 15 October 2008 on agricultural product quality: product standards, farming requirements and quality schemes ( COM(2008)0641 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. oktobra 1998 o politiki kakovosti kmetijskih in kmetijsko-živilskih proizvodov
– having regard to its resolution of 9 October 1998 on quality policy for agricultural products and agri-foodstuffs
UL C 328, 26.10.1998, str.
OJ C 328, 26.10.1998, p.
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije iz oktobra 2008 o shemah za potrjevanje kakovosti živil,
– having regard to the Commission working document of October 2008 on food quality certification schemes,
– ob upoštevanju pregleda skupne kmetijske politike (SKP),
– having regard to the health check for the common agricultural policy (CAP),
– ob upoštevanju mandata Evropskega sveta Komisiji za pogajanja na področju kmetijstva, ki je podan v predlogu Komisije iz januarja 2003 o postopkih pri pogajanjih v okviru STO na področju kmetijstva (dokument 625/02),
– having regard to the mandate issued by the European Council to the Commission for the negotiations in the field of agriculture, as laid down in the Commission’s Proposal for Modalities in the WTO Agriculture Negotiations (document 625/02) of January 2003,
– ob upoštevanju konference z naslovom „Food Quality Certification – Adding Value to Farm Produce”, ki jo je organizirala Komisija 5. in 6. februarja 2007 v Bruslju,
– having regard to the conference organised by the Commission in Brussels on 5 and 6 February 2007 on the topic of ‘Food Quality Certification – Adding Value to Farm Produce’,
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom ( KOM(2008)0040 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers ( COM(2008)0040 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenja Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6–0088/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0088/2009 ),
A. ker so standardi Evropske unije v zvezi z varnostjo hrane in njeno kakovostjo najstrožji na svetu,
A. whereas the EU has the highest quality and standards for food products in the world,
B. ker ti standardi izpolnjujejo pričakovanja evropskih potrošnikov in so sredstvo za ustvarjanje pomembne dodane vrednosti,
B. whereas these high standards are demanded by Europe's consumers and represent a means of maximising high value added,
C. ker potrošnike poleg varnosti hrane izjemno zanimajo tudi poreklo in metode proizvodnje živil; ker se je Evropska unija že odzvala na te težnje in uvedla štiri oznake kakovosti in porekla živil, in sicer zaščiteno označbo porekla (ZOP), zaščiteno geografsko označbo (ZGO), zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnost (ZTP) in ekološko živilo,
C. whereas there is ever-increasing consumer interest not only in food safety but also in the origins and production methods of food products; whereas the European Union has already responded to this trend introducing four food quality and origin marks, namely Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indication (PGI), Traditional Speciality Guaranteed (TSG) and Organic Farming,
D. ker so kakovostni evropski proizvodi del „žive“ kulturne in gastronomske dediščine Evropske unije in zato pomemben sestavni del gospodarskega in družbenega življenja mnogih evropskih regij, saj omogočajo dejavnosti, ki so zlasti na podeželskih območjih neposredno povezane z lokalnimi razmerami,
D. whereas European quality products constitute a living cultural and gastronomic heritage for the Union, and are an essential component of economic and social activity in many of Europe's regions, bolstering activities directly linked to local realities, especially in rural areas,