natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(o) zagotovi naj, da države članice, ki prestrezajo in nadzirajo podatkovni promet, ne glede na to, ali ta zadeva njihove državljane ali podatkovni promet iz tujine, to počnejo v skladu s strogimi pogoji in jamstvi, ki jih predvideva zakon; pozove naj države članice, da zagotovijo, da se preiskave na daljavo, če jih nacionalna zakonodaja predvideva, izvajajo na podlagi veljavnega naloga za preiskavo, ki ga izda pristojni sodni organ; upošteva naj, da poenostavljeni postopki za izvajanje preiskav na daljavo v primerjavi z neposrednimi raziskavami niso sprejemljivi, saj kršijo vladavino prava in pravico do zasebnosti;
(o) ensure that Member States that intercept and monitor data traffic, regardless of whether that applies to their own citizens or to data traffic from abroad, do so under the strict conditions and safeguards provided by law; call on Member States to ensure that remote searches, if provided for by national law, are conducted on the basis of a valid search warrant issued by the competent judicial authorities; note that simplified procedures for conducting remote searches in comparison with direct searches are unacceptable, as they infringe the rule of law and the right to privacy;
(p) prizna naj nevarnost nekaterih načinov internetnega spremljanja in nadzorovanja, ki so namenjeni tudi sledenju vseh posameznikovih digitalnih korakov, da bi oblikovali uporabniške profile in dodelili točke; pojasni naj, da morajo takšne tehnike biti vedno ocenjene glede na njihovo nujnost in sorazmernost z vidika zastavljenih ciljev; poudari naj tudi, da sta potrebna večja ozaveščenost in prostovoljno soglasje uporabnikov glede njihovih računalniških dejavnosti, ki vključujejo izmenjavo osebnih podatkov (kot v primeru družbenih omrežij);
(p) recognise the danger of certain forms of Internet surveillance and control aimed also at tracking every ‘digital’ step of an individual, with the aim of providing a profile of the user and of assigning 'scores'; make clear the fact that such techniques should always be assessed in terms of their necessity and their proportionality in the light of the objectives they aim to achieve; emphasise also the need for an enhanced awareness and informed consent of users with respect to their e-activities involving the sharing of personal data (for instance in the case of social networks);
(q) države članice naj pozove, da prepoznajo vse subjekte, ki uporabljajo nadzor interneta, in pripravijo javno dostopna letna poročila o nadzoru interneta in hkrati zagotovijo zakonitost, sorazmernost in preglednost;
(q) urge the Member States to identify all entities which use Net Surveillance and to draw up publicly accessible annual reports on Net Surveillance ensuring legality, proportionality and transparency;
(r) preuči in predpiše naj omejitve glede soglasja uporabnikov o razkritju dela zasebnosti, ki ga lahko zahtevajo in pridobijo vlade ali zasebna podjetja, saj obstaja očitno nesorazmerje med pogajalsko močjo in poznavanjem med posameznimi uporabniki in takšnimi institucijami;
(r) examine and prescribe limits to the ‘consent’ that can be requested of and extracted from users, whether by governments or by private companies, to relinquish part of their privacy, as there is a clear imbalance of negotiating power and of knowledge between individual users and such institutions;
(s) strogo naj omeji, opredeli in regulira primere, v katerih se od zasebnega internetnega podjetja lahko zahteva, da vladnim organom razkrije podatke, ter naj poleg tega zagotovi, da za vlade veljajo najstrožji standardi varovanja podatkov pri uporabi teh podatkov; vzpostavi naj učinkovit nadzor in ocenjevanje tega procesa;
(s) strictly limit, define and regulate the cases in which a private Internet company may be required to disclose data to government authorities, and further ensure that the use of that data by governments is subject to the strictest data protection standards; establish effective control and evaluation of that process;
(t) poudari naj, da je pomembno, da lahko internetni uporabniki razširijo svojo pravico doseči trajen izbris svojih osebnih podatkov, ki se nahajajo na spletnih straneh ali na nosilcih za shranjevanje podatkov katere koli tretje strani; zagotovi naj, da ponudniki internetnih storitev, spletni trgovci in ponudniki storitev informacijske družbe spoštujejo takšno odločitev uporabnikov; zagotovi naj, da države članice zagotavljajo učinkovito izvajanje pravice državljanov do dostopa do svojih osebnih podatkov, vključno z izbrisom tovrstnih podatkov ali njihovim umikom s spletnih strani, kjer je to primerno;
(t) stress the importance of Internet users being able to enhance their right to obtain the permanent deletion of their personal data located on Internet websites or on any third party data storage medium; ensure that such a decision by users is respected by Internet service providers, e-commerce providers and information society services; ensure that Member States provide for the effective enforcement of the citizens' right of access to their personal data, including, as appropriate, the erasure of such data or its removal from web sites;
(u) obsodi naj vladno cenzuro vsebine, ki jo je mogoče poiskati na internetu, zlasti ko lahko takšne omejitve negativno vplivajo na politično izražanje;
(u) condemn government-imposed censorship of the content that may be searched on Internet sites, especially when such restrictions can have a 'chilling effect' on political speech;
(v) države članice naj pozove, naj zagotovijo, da ne bo prišlo do poljubnega omejevanja svobode izražanja s strani javne in/ali zasebne sfere, in se izognejo vsem zakonskim ali upravnim ukrepom, ki bi negativno vplivali na vse vidike svobode izražanja;
(v) call on the Member States to ensure that freedom of expression is not subject to arbitrary restrictions from the public and/or private sphere and to avoid all legislative or administrative measures that could have a "chilling effect" on all aspects of freedom of speech;
(w) upošteva naj, da mora prenos osebnih podatkov tretjim državam – med drugim – potekati v skladu z določbami iz direktive 95/46/ES in okvirnega sklepa 2008/977/PNZ;
(w) recall that transfer of personal data to third countries must take place in accordance with the provisions laid down in, inter alia, Directive 95/46/EC and in Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA;
(x) opozori naj na dejstvo, da razvoj „interneta stvari“ in uporaba sistemov za radiofrekvenčno identifikacijo (RFID) ne bi smela obiti varstva podatkov in državljanskih pravic;
(x) draw attention to the fact that the development of the 'Internet of things' and the use of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems should not sidestep the protection of data and of citizens' rights;
(y) države članice naj pozove, da pravilno uporabljajo direktivo 95/46/ES o osebnih podatkih v povezavi z internetom; države članice naj opozori, da ta direktiva, zlasti njen člen 8, velja ne glede na tehnologijo, ki se uporablja za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, in da njene določbe od držav članic zahtevajo, da zagotovijo pravico do pravnega sredstva in nadomestila v primeru njihove kršitve (členi 22, 23 in 24);
(y) call on the Member States to apply Directive 95/46/EC on personal data in relation to the Internet correctly; remind the Member States that this Directive, especially Article 8, applies regardless of the technology used for the processing of personal data and that its provisions call for Member States to provide the right to a judicial remedy and compensation for their infringement (Articles 22, 23, and 24);
(z) spodbuja naj vključitev osnovnih načel „Listine o temeljnih pravicah na internetu“ v proces raziskav in razvoja instrumentov in aplikacij, povezanih z internetom, ter pospeševanje načela spoštovanja zasebnosti že pri načrtovanju ( ang. privacy by design ), v skladu s katerim je zahteve za varovanje zasebnosti in podatkov treba čim prej vključiti v življenjski ciklus novih tehnoloških razvojev, kar zagotavlja državljanom uporabniku prijazno okolje;
(z) encourage the incorporation of fundamental principles of the “Internet Bill of Rights” into the research and development process of Internet-related instruments and applications and the promotion of the “privacy by design” principle according to which privacy and data protection requirements should be introduced as soon as possible in the life cycle of new technological developments, assuring citizens a user-friendly environment;
(za) podpira in zahteva naj dejavno vključevanje Evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov in delovne skupine iz člena 29 v razvoj evropske zakonodaje, ki obravnava internetne dejavnosti z možnim vplivom na varstvo podatkov;
(za) support and request the active involvement of the European Data Protection Supervisor and of the Article 29 Working Party in the development of European legislation dealing with Internet activities with a potential impact on data protection;
(zb) Komisijo naj pozove, naj izvede poglobljeno študijo o vidikih zasebnosti pri spletnem oglaševanju;
(zb) call on the Commission to carry out an in-depth study of the privacy aspects of online advertising;
Mednarodne obveze
International undertakings
(zc) vse internetne akterje naj opozarja, da se udeležijo potekajočega procesa za „listino temeljnih pravic na internetu“, ki gradi na obstoječih temeljnih pravicah, spodbuja njihovo uveljavljanje in pospešuje priznavanje novih načel; v zvezi s tem mora glavno vlogo imeti dinamična koalicija za listino temeljnih pravic na internetu;
(zc) exhort all Internet players to engage in the on-going process of “Internet Bill of Rights,” which builds on existing fundamental rights, promotes their enforcement, and fosters the recognition of emerging principles; in this respect the dynamic coalition on the Internet Bill of Rights has a leading role to play;
(zd) v zvezi s tem naj zagotovi, da bosta pri določitvi in zaščiti pravic internetnih uporabnikov upoštevani večstranska pobuda na več ravneh, ki je usmerjena na proces, in kombinacija globalnih in lokalnih pobud, in na ta način zagotovi legitimnost, odgovornost in sprejemljivost procesa;
(zd) ensure that, in this context, a multi-stakeholder, multi-level, process-oriented initiative and a mix between global and local initiatives are considered in order to specify and protect the rights of Internet users and thereby ensure the legitimacy, accountability and acceptance of the process;
(ze) prizna naj, da globalna in odprta narava interneta zahteva globalne standarde za varstvo podatkov, varnost in svobodo govora; države članice in Komisijo naj v zvezi s tem pozove, da prevzamejo pobudo za pripravo tovrstnih standardov; pozdravi naj resolucijo o nujni potrebi po varovanju zasebnosti v svetu brez meja in oblikovanju skupnega predloga za vzpostavitev mednarodnih standardov za varovanje zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov s 30. mednarodne konference pooblaščencev za področje zasebnosti in varstva podatkov, ki je potekala od 15. do 17. oktobra 2008 v Strasbourgu; pozove naj vse interesne skupine v EU (tako javne kot zasebne), naj pričnejo z razmislekom o tem;
(ze) recognise that the global and open nature of the Internet requires global standards for data protection, security and freedom of speech; in this context call on Member States and the Commission to take the initiative for the drawing up of such standards; welcome the resolution on the urgent need for protecting privacy in a borderless world, and for reaching a Joint Proposal for setting International Standards on Privacy and Personal Data Protection of the 30th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners held in Strasbourg, on 15–17 October 2008; urge all EU stakeholders (public as well as private) to engage in this reflection;
(zf) poudari naj pomembnost razvijanja pravih spletnih forumov, kjer bodo državljani Unije lahko sodelovali v bolj interaktivnih razpravah z oblikovalci politike in drugimi institucionalnimi interesnimi skupinami;
(zf) stress the importance of developing a real Web E-agora where Union citizens can have a more interactive discussion with policy makers and other institutional stakeholders;
(zg) spodbuja naj dejavno sodelovanje EU na različnih mednarodnih forumih, na katerih se obravnavajo svetovni in lokalni vidiki interneta, kot je forum o upravljanju interneta;
(zg) encourage the active participation of the EU in different international fora dealing with global and localised aspects of the Internet, such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF);
(zh) z drugimi pomembnimi akterji EU naj sodeluje pri vzpostavitvi evropskega foruma za upravljanje interneta, ki bi povzel izkušnje, pridobljene na nacionalnih forumih za upravljanje interneta, deloval kot regionalni pol in učinkoviteje posredoval vseevropske zadeve, stališča in skrbi na prihodnjih mednarodnih forumu za upravljanje interneta;
(zh) take part together with all the relevant EU actors in the establishment of a European IGF that would take stock of the experience gained by national IGFs, function as a regional pole, and relay more efficiently Europe-wide issues, positions and concerns in the upcoming international IGFs;
Temeljne pravice na internetu - okrepljene in hkrati ogrožene
Fundamental Rights on the Internet – enhanced and endangered at the same time
Živimo v dobi, ko vsi, od vlad do policije, zasebnih podjetij in celo zločincev, poskušajo pridobiti čim širši dostop do naših zasebnih elektronskih podatkov.
We live in an age where everyone, from governments to police, private companies and even criminals, seek the greatest possible access to our private electronic data.
Zaščita temeljne pravice do zasebnosti na internetu je tako postala ena najbolj perečih nalog, s katero se moramo spoprijeti kot zakonodajalci.
Therefore, ensuring the protection of the fundamental right to privacy on the Internet is one of the most urgent tasks that we as legislators face.
Je tudi eden izmed najbolj zapletenih etničnih, pravih, tehnoloških in političnih izzivov, s katerimi se je doslej srečala naša družba.
It is also one of the thorniest ethical, legal, technological, and political challenges our societies ever have confronted.
Vsakemu je jasno, da je lahko internet orodje za razširitev naših temeljnih pravic, saj nam nudi brezmejne podatke ter nas povezuje s posamezniki in skupnostmi po vsem svetu.
It is clear to everyone that the Internet can be a tool to expand our fundamental rights, empowering us with boundless information and connecting us with individuals and communities around the world.
Manj pa se govori o tem, da internet v tem procesu predstavlja tudi veliko nevarnost za naše temelje pravice, saj nas lahko izpostavi nevarnemu nadzorovanju ali služi kot orodje zločincem in tudi teroristom.
It is somewhat less well acknowledged that, in the process, the Internet also poses a profound danger to our fundamental rights, potentially exposing us to pernicious surveillance, while serving as a tool for criminals and even terrorists.
Najmanj očitno pa je, kako bi se dalo internet urediti na način, da bi nam prinašal koristi, hkrati pa bi nas obranil pred resno nevarnostjo zlorabe.
And least clear of all is how we can regulate the Internet in such a way that allows us to draw on its benefits, while limiting the very real and serious dangers of abuse.
Ta razmislek je še toliko bolj zapletena zaradi svojevrstne narave interneta, ki je decentralizirano omrežje, ki ga usmerjajo uporabniki, ki ni pod nadzorom nobene vlade in ki prečka skoraj vse meje.
This calculus is made all the more complicated by the inherent nature of the Internet — a decentralized, user-driven network that is under the control of no government and that transcends nearly all borders.
Poročilo je torej namenjeno temu, da bi ugotovili, kako najbolje zaščititi in krepiti temeljne svoboščine posameznikov v spletnem svetu.
This report, therefore, aims to highlight how we can best protect and promote the fundamental freedoms of individuals in an online environment.
Glavni elementi pri obravnavi tega vprašanja bi med drugim morali:
Among the essential elements of our response should be to:
– vključevati vse zainteresirane strani;
– Involve all stakeholders;
– delovati na različnih ravneh in pri tem uporabljati obstoječe nacionalne, regionalne in mednarodne instrumente ter upoštevati, kako se uporabljajo v sodobni zakonodajni praksi;
– Act at different levels, making use of existing national, regional, and international instruments and observing how they are applied in today's legislative practice;
– izmenjevati najboljšo prakso; ter
– Exchange best practices; and
– odgovarjati na potrebe in probleme različnih skupin internetnih uporabnikov ter številnih vrst spletnih dejavnosti (ki se neprestano razvijajo).
– Respond to the needs and problems of various types of Internet users and of many (and constantly evolving) kinds of online activities.
Naš osrednji cilj je poiskati ustrezno ravnotežje med zasebnostjo in varnostjo.
Striking an appropriate balance between privacy and security is at the heart of our mission.
Pri tem je potrebna stalna opreznost in preverjanje stanja, tako da bomo lahko sledili nezaustavljivemu pohodu tehnologije.
It will demand constant vigilance and recalibration, so that we stay in sync with technology’s irrepressible march.
Pazljivo moramo preučiti vse vrste varnostnih vprašanj, kot so nacionalna varnost, varnost in zanesljivost naših mrež ter osebna varnost posameznikov, ki izmenjuje podatke na spletu.
We must carefully consider security concerns of all kinds, from questions of national security, to the security and reliability of our networks, to the personal security of individuals as they share their data online.
Če je zagotavljanje varnejšega interneta zakonit cilj naše družbe, potem moramo obravnavati in omejiti tehnologije spremljanja in nadzorovanja, ki lahko ogrozijo naše temelje svoboščine, še posebej, ko se pojavljajo dvomi glede potrebe, sorazmernosti in učinkovitosti spremljanja ali nadzorovanja.
If ensuring a safer Internet is a legitimate objective for our societies, then we must address and constrain the use of surveillance and monitoring techniques that might threaten our fundamental freedoms—especially when their necessity, proportionality, and efficiency are in question.
Prožnost, prilagodljivost in odgovornost morajo biti merila za vso zakonodajo in programe, ki jih oblikujemo, da bomo lahko na ta način ostali korak pred razvijajočo se tehnologijo.
Flexibility, adaptability, and accountability must be the hallmarks of any legislation and programs we develop, so that we are able to stay one step ahead of evolving technologies.
Internet lahko zelo okrepi naše temeljne svoboščine, kot so svoboda govora, političnega delovanja in združevanja , hkrati pa jih lahko z lahkoto spodkopava.
The Internet also can greatly enhance other fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech, of political action, and of association — but it just as easily can also undermine them.
Eden nedavnih primerov, povezanih s to razpravo, je bila zakonodajna pobuda za nadzorovanje govora na internetu, da bi na ta način preprečili teroristične napade.
One recent instance of this debate was the legislative initiative for monitoring of speech on the Internet in order to prevent terrorist attacks.
To je zelo tipičen primer zakonodaje, ki lahko, če ni zelo natančno omejena za doseganje posameznega cilja, privede do vsesplošnega nadzorovanja in posameznikom onemogoči politično izražanje, kar je osrednje načelo demokratične družbe.
This is a classic example of legislation that, unless very narrowly tailored to achieve its goals, could open up the door to massive surveillance, thus "chilling" the political speech of individuals — which is at the heart of a democratic society.
Določitev ustreznega ravnotežja pri teh vprašanjih je torej ključnega pomena.
Finding the right balance on points such as this is crucial.
Nedvomno je, da nudi internet zločincem izreden niz novih orodij, prav tako pa je jasno, da je teroristom treba preprečiti uporabo interneta za načrtovanje in izvajanje napadov.
There is no question that the Internet has bestowed on criminals a powerful new set of tools, and it goes without saying that terrorists should be prevented from using the Internet to plan and execute attacks.
Naša družba nadalje upravičeno zahteva, da na internetu preprečimo otroško pornografijo.
Likewise, our societies rightly demand that we thwart child pornographers on the Internet.
Ti zločinci, ki predstavljajo resno grožnjo, omejujejo odpor državljanov, kadar pride do pozivov policije za razširjen nadzor nad internetom, ki je po svoji naravi neotipljiv.
Such criminals, in posing tangible threats, lower resistance among our citizens to police calls for widespread monitoring of the Internet — which, by its nature, is "intangible".
Vendar se je treba temu trendu upreti.
We must resist this tendency.
Malo ljudi bi se na primer strinjalo s tem, da lahko policija ali podjetja za trženje odprejo vsako pismo, ki je poslano prek pošte, in preverijo njegovo vsebino.
For example, few people would accept the notion that the police or marketing companies might open up every letter sent via the post office to check its content.
Podobna opreznost je potrebna pri zaščiti vsebine elektronskih sporočil.
Similar vigilance is required when protecting the content of electronic communications.
Vendar za omejevanjem govora in poseganjem v zasebnost ne stojijo vedno oblasti, ki preganjajo zločince, temveč tudi zasebna internetna podjetja, ki želijo zaslužiti.
But speech may be chilled and privacy invaded not only by government authorities in pursuit of criminals, but also by private Internet companies in pursuit of profit.
Najnovejši trend, kadar je takšen primer razkrit - torej ponavadi takrat, ko je podjetje zaloteno pri zbiranju, shranjevanju in uporabi podatkov o nas brez naše privolitve -, je, da se zaprosi za „soglasje” uporabnika (na osnovi privolitve ali zavrnitve sodelovanja) za uporabo njegovih podatkov.
The newest tendency when this transpires – and usually only after companies are caught red-handed collecting, storing, and using our data without authorization -- is to demand the "consent" of the user (either on an opt-in or an opt-out basis) for the use of his or her data.
Vprašati se moramo, kje so meje takšnega soglasja .
We must ask ourselves, “What are the limits of consent?”
Vprašanje se postavlja, za kakšno razkritje lahko podjetje prosi uporabnika in do kakšne mere sme posameznik razkriti svojo zasebnost in se odpovedati drugim temeljnim svoboščinam, da bi lahko uporabljal določene internetne storitve ali ugodnosti.
This question applies both to what a company can ask a user to disclose, and to what an individual should be allowed to cede of his privacy and other fundamental rights in order to receive certain Internet services or privileges.
Odgovori na ta vprašanja niso jasni.
The answers to these questions are not so straightforward.
Na drugih področjih, kot je na primer delovna zakonodaja, se je naša družba sporazumela o omejitvah, kar zadeva soglasje državljanov v zvezi z njihovim zasebnim življenjem.
In another domain — that of labor legislation — our societies have agreed that there are limits to citizens’ consent over their private lives.
Delovna zakonodaja in sporazumi o kolektivnem pogajanju v večini držav članic na primer predpisujejo najvišje število delovnih ur, minimalno plačo in druge delavske pravice, o katerih se posamezniki ne morejo pogajati s svojimi delodajalci.
Labor law and collective bargaining agreements in most member states determine, for example, maximum working hours, minimum wages, or other labor rights, which individuals cannot be asked to "negotiate away" with their employers.
Namen omenjene zakonodaje je prav tako preprečiti, da bi bile delavske pravice izpostavljene „tekmovalnosti za vsako ceno”, kar bi pripeljalo do tega, da bi bilo posameznim delavcem dovoljeno oziroma bi bilo prisiljeni v to, da se odpovejo nekaterim svojim pravicam.
Another reason is that we have also decided that we must prevent a "race to the bottom" upon the whole body of labor rights, which could ensue if some individual workers were allowed or "forced" to negotiate away some of their rights.