natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija pregleda izvajanje te direktive , zlasti glede možne enotne uporabe inšpekcijskega režima Skupnosti, najpozneje v 18 mesecih od ….
The Commission shall review the implementation of this Directive , in particular with a view to a uniform application of the Community inspection regime, no later than 18 months from ....
Pomembno je, da se v pregled izvajanja vključi enotna uporaba in da je izčrpen.
It is important that the review of implementation considers uniform application and is comprehensive.
Člen 35 – odstavek 1
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, do ….
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by … .
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s členi […] in točkami […] iz prilog [….] [členi ali podrazdelki te direktive in točke prilog, ki so se v primerjavi s prejšnjo direktivo vsebinsko spremenili] najkasneje 18 mesecev po datumu iz člena 37.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles […] and points […] of Annexes [….] [articles or subdivisions thereof, and points of Annexes which have been changed as to their substance by comparison with the earlier Directive] not later than 18 months after the date fixed in Article 3 7 .
Komisiji takoj sporočijo besedilo teh predpisov in korelacijsko tabelo med temi predpisi in to direktivo.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive .
Tabele ujemanja so potrebne za ustrezno izvajanje direktive.
Correlation tables are necessary to ensure proper implementation of the Directive.
Člen 37 – pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 37 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Členi […] in točke […] iz prilog […] [členi ali podrazdelki te direktive in točke prilog, ki se v primerjavi s prejšnjo direktivo niso spremenili,] se uporabljajo od… * .
Articles […] and points […] of annexes […] [articles or subdivisions thereof, and points of annexes which are unchanged by comparison with the earlier Directive] shall apply from ... * .
* Datum začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
* Date of entry into force of this Directive.
Uskladitev besedila s predlogom spremembe 38.
Brings the text in line with Amendment 38.
Priloga I – del II – točka 1 – alineja 3
Annex I – part II – point 1 – indent 3
Priloga I, del II, točka 1
Annex I part II point 1
– Kateri koli malo rizični ladji, ki v preteklih 36 mesecih ni bila pregledana v pristanišču Evropske unije ali na območju podpisnic Pariškega MOU.
- Any ship with a low risk profile which has not been inspected in a port of the EU or of the Paris MOU region during the last 36 months .
Malo nevarne ladje so primerne za inšpekcijski pregled od 24 meseca dalje.
Low risk ships become eligible for inspection as from the 24th month.
– Kateri koli malo rizični ladji, ki v preteklih 30 mesecih ni bila pregledana v pristanišču Evropske unije ali na območju podpisnic Pariškega MOU.
- Any ship with a low risk profile which has not been inspected in a port of the EU or of the Paris MOU region during the last 30 months .
Tri leta med posameznimi pregledi je predolgo.
Three years is too long a period between inspections.
Priloga I – del II – točka 2 A – alinej 3 a (novo)
Annex I – part II – point 2 A – indent 3 a (new)
– Ladje, ki niso izpolnile ustreznih zahtev glede obveščanja, navedenih v členu 8 te direktive, v Direktivi 2000/59/ES, Direktivi 2002/59/ES in, če je primerno, Uredbi (ES) št. 725/2004.
- Ships which have failed to comply with the relevant notification requirements referred to in Article 8 of this Directive, in Directive 2000/59/EC, Directive 2002/59/EC and if appropriate in Regulation (EC) N o 725/2004.
Za take ladje bi moralo veljati, da so potrebni dodatni pregledi.
Such ships should be subject to additional inspections.
Priloga I – del II – točka 2 A – alineja 3 b (novo)
Annex I – part II – point 2 A – indent 3 b (new)
– Ladje, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene izrazite pomanjkljivosti, razen tistih, pri katerih so bile pomanjkljivosti odpravljene pred izplutjem.
- Ships which have been reported with outstanding deficiencies, except those for which deficiencies had to be rectified before departure.
Priloga I – del II – točka 3 B
Annex I – part II – point 3 B
Inšpekcijski pregledi ladij iz prednostne skupine II se lahko opravijo, kot sledi :
Priority ships may be inspected as follows :
Če pristojni organ ladjo iz prednostne skupine II določi za pregled, se uporabi naslednji sistem izbire :
If the competent authority selects a Priority II ship for inspection, the following selection scheme shall apply :
(a) Razširjen inšpekcijski pregled se lahko opravi na:
(a) An expanded inspection may be carried out on:
(a) Razširjeni inšpekcijski pregled se opravi na:
(a) An expanded inspection shall be carried out on:
– vseh zelo rizičnih ladjah, ki niso bile pregledane v zadnjih 5 mesecih,
- any ship with a high risk profile not inspected in the last five months,
– vseh potniških ladjah, tankerjih za prevoz nafte, tankerjih za prevoz kemikalij, tankerjih za prevoz plina in ladjah za prevoz razsutega tovora, starejših od 12 let, ki so običajno rizične in v zadnjih 10 mesecih niso bile inšpekcijsko pregledane, ali
- any passenger ship, oil tanker, gas or chemical tanker or bulk carrier, older than 12 years of age, with a standard risk profile not inspected in the last 10 months, or
– vseh potniških ladjah, tankerjih za prevoz nafte, tankerjih za prevoz kemikalij, tankerjih za prevoz plina in ladjah za prevoz razsutega tovora, starejših od 12 let, ki so malo rizične in v zadnjih 24 mesecih niso bile inšpekcijsko pregledane.
- any passenger ship, oil tanker, gas or chemical tanker or bulk carrier, older than 12 years of age, with a low risk profile not inspected in the last 24 months.
(b) Prvi ali podrobni inšpekcijski pregled se lahko opravi na:
(b) An initial or a more detailed inspection, as appropriate, may be carried out on:
(b) Prvi ali podrobni inšpekcijski pregled se opravi na:
(b) An initial or a more detailed inspection, as appropriate, shall be carried out on:
– vseh drugih ladjah, ki niso potniške ladje, tankerjih za prevoz nafte, tankerjih za prevoz kemikalij, tankerjih za prevoz plina ali ladjah za prevoz razsutega tovora, starejših od 12 let, ki so običajno rizične in v zadnjih 10 mesecih niso bile inšpekcijsko pregledane, ali
- any ship other than a passenger ship, an oil tanker, a gas or chemical tanker or a bulk carrier, older than 12 years of age, with a standard risk profile not inspected in the last 10 months, or
– vseh drugih ladjah, ki niso potniške ladje, tankerjih za prevoz nafte, tankerjih za prevoz kemikalij, tankerjih za prevoz plina ali ladjah za prevoz razsutega tovora, starejših od 12 let, ki so malo rizične in v zadnjih 24 mesecih niso bile inšpekcijsko pregledane.
- any ship other than a passenger ship, an oil tanker, a gas or chemical tanker or a bulk carrier, older than 12 years of age, with a low risk profile not inspected in the last 24 months.
(c) V primeru nepričakovanih okoliščin:
(c) In case of an unexpected factor:
– Podrobni ali razširjeni inšpekcijski pregled se po strokovni presoji inšpektorja lahko opravi na vseh zelo rizičnih ladjah in na vseh potniških ladjah, tankerjih za prevoz nafte, tankerjih za prevoz kemikalij, tankerjih za prevoz plina in ladjah za prevoz razsutega tovora, starejših od 12 let,
- a more detailed or an expanded inspection according to the professional judgement of the inspector, may be carried out on any ship with a high risk profile or any passenger ship, oil tanker, gas or chemical tanker or bulk carrier, older than 12 years of age,
– Podrobni ali razširjeni inšpekcijski pregled se po strokovni presoji inšpektorja opravi na vseh zelo rizičnih ladjah in na vseh potniških ladjah, tankerjih za prevoz nafte, tankerjih za prevoz kemikalij, tankerjih za prevoz plina in ladjah za prevoz razsutega tovora, starejših od 12 let,
- a more detailed or an expanded inspection according to the professional judgement of the inspector, shall be carried out on any ship with a high risk profile or any passenger ship, oil tanker, gas or chemical tanker or bulk carrier, older than 12 years of age,
– Podrobni pregled se lahko opravi na vseh drugih ladjah, ki niso potniške ladje, tankerjih za prevoz nafte, tankerjih za prevoz kemikalij, tankerjih za prevoz plina ali ladjah za prevoz razsutega tovora, starejših od 12 let.
- a more detailed inspection may be carried out on any ship other than a passenger ship, an oil tanker, a gas or chemical tanker or a bulk carrier, older than 12 years of age.
– Podrobni pregled se opravi na vseh drugih ladjah, ki niso potniške ladje, tankerjih za prevoz nafte, tankerjih za prevoz kemikalij, tankerjih za prevoz plina ali ladjah za prevoz razsutega tovora, starejših od 12 let.
- a more detailed inspection shall be carried out on any ship other than a passenger ship, an oil tanker, a gas or chemical tanker or a bulk carrier, older than 12 years of age.
Za smiselne in dejansko predpisane obveznosti inšpekcije.
Makes inspection obligations clever and mandatory.
(iz člena 8(1))
(referred in Article 8(1))
(iz člena 8(1))
(referred to in Article 8(1))
Informacije, ki jih je treba predložiti v skladu s členom 8(1):
Information to be provided in accordance with Article 8(1):
Če se pričakuje, da bo vožnja trajala manj kakor tri dni, se vsaj tri dni pred načrtovanim vplutjem v pristanišče ali pred izplutjem iz prejšnjega pristanišča predložijo pristaniškemu organu ali telesu ali za ta namen določenemu organu ali telesu naslednji podatki:
The information listed below shall be submitted to the port authority or body or to the authority or body designated for that purpose at least three days before the expected time of arrival in the port or before leaving the previous port if the voyage is expected to take fewer than three days:
Če se pričakuje, da bo vožnja trajala manj kakor tri dni, se vsaj tri dni pred načrtovanim vplutjem v pristanišče ali sidrišče ali pred izplutjem iz prejšnjega pristanišča predložijo pristaniškemu organu ali telesu ali za ta namen določenemu organu ali telesu naslednji podatki:
The information listed below shall be submitted to the port authority or body or to the authority or body designated for that purpose at least three days before the expected time of arrival in the port or anchorage or before leaving the previous port if the voyage is expected to take fewer than three days:
(b) predvideno trajanje postanka;
(b) planned duration of the call;
(b) predvideno trajanje postanka in seznam pristanišč Skupnosti, v katera ladja zaporedno pripluje na tej poti ;
(b) planned duration of the call and list of Community ports successively visited on the same voyage ;
(i) oblika: enojni trup, enojni trup s SBT, dvojni trup;
(i) configuration: single hull, single hull with SBT, double hull;
(ii) stanje cistern za tovor in balast: polne, prazne, inertne;
(ii) condition of the cargo and ballast tanks: full, empty, inerted;
(d) načrtovani postopki v namembnem pristanišču (natovarjanje, raztovarjanje, drugo);
(d) planned operations at the port of destination (loading, unloading, other);
d a) pristanišča ali sidrišča pristanka v Skupnosti, v katera ladja zaporedno pripluje na tej poti;
d a) ports of call or anchorage in the Community subsequently reached during the same voyage;
(e) načrtovani predpisani inšpekcijski pregledi in večja vzdrževalna dela ter popravila, ki se bodo izvedla v namembnem pristanišču;
(e) planned statutory survey inspections and substantial maintenance and repair work to be carried out whilst in the port of destination;
(e) načrtovani predpisani inšpekcijski pregledi in večja vzdrževalna dela ter popravila, ki se bodo izvedla v namembnem pristanišču ali sidrišču ;
(e) planned statutory survey inspections and substantial maintenance and repair work to be carried out whilst in the port or anchorage of destination;
(f) datum zadnjega razširjenega inšpekcijskega pregleda na območju podpisnic Pariškega MOU.
(f) date of last expanded inspection in the Paris MOU.
Priloga IV – točka 41 a (novo)
Annex IV – point 41 a (new)
Spričevala, ki se zahtevajo v skladu z Direktivo 2008/XX/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne... [o spremembi Direktive 2002/59/ES o vzpostavitvi sistema spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet ter režima civilne odgovornosti in finančnega jamstva lastnikov ladij].
Certificates required under Directive 2008/XX/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of … [amending Directive 2002/59/EC establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system and a regime for civil liability and financial guarantees for shipowners].
Po mnenju poročevalke pa so še druga bistvena vprašanja, ki presegajo tehnično usklajevanje in zahtevajo temeljit premislek.
In your rapporteur's view there are nevertheless other, more substantive policy issues which go beyond technical alignment and need careful consideration.
Parlament se je z njimi že ukvarjal med prvo obravnavo zadeve.
These were, of course, taken into consideration in Parliament's First Reading.
Poleg tega se poročevalka dobro zaveda, da je direktiva o pomorski inšpekciji države pristanišča tista iz paketa sedmih, zdaj osmih zakonodajnih predlogov, ki bo na skupno varnost na morju bolj vplivala kot druge direktive iz paketa skupaj.
In addition your rapporteur is conscious of the fact that the Directive on Port State Control is one of a package of seven, now eight legislative proposals, whose impact on maritime safety, taken as a whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
Prav zaradi tega na tej stopnji ne more priporočiti sprejema skupnega stališča Sveta in tam, kjer se predlogi sprememb vežejo na ključna politična področja, predlaga obnovitev stališča Parlamenta iz prve obravnave.
For these reasons your rapporteur cannot at this stage recommend adoption of the Council's Common Position and proposes the reinstatement of the Parliament's First Reading position where amendments relate to key policy areas.
Člani odbora se bodo spomnili, da je Parlament predlog direktive v prvi obravnavi sprejel aprila 2007, Svet pa je Parlament o svojem skupnem stališču obvestil junija 2008.
As members will recall Parliament adopted its first Reading on the proposed Directive in April 2007 and Council finally advised Parliament of its Common Position in June 2008.
V vmesnem času je delo v okviru Pariškega memoranduma o načinih izvajanja inšpekcijskega režima Svet navedlo na to, da je predlagal spremembe na nekaterih področjih, kot so, denimo, določila o prenosu podatkov ali merilih za klasifikacijo ladij.
In this intervening period work within the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on the modalities of the inspection regime has resulted in Council proposing changes in areas such as arrangements for the transmission of information or criteria for the classification of ships.
Poleg tega bodo morale države članice pripraviti tabele ujemanja med njihovimi ukrepi za prenos in direktivo.
In addition Member States should draw up tables which correlate their transposition measures with the Directive.
Večja razhajanja s Svetom
Major Differences with Council
Do bistvenih razlik med zaključki prve obravnave Parlamenta in skupnim stališčem Sveta prihaja na treh področjih.
There are three areas of significant difference between the Parliament's First Reading and the Council's Common Position.
Podstandardne ladje lahko tako kot v pristaniščih pristajajo tudi na sidriščih.
Sub standard vessels can as easily call at anchorages as at ports.
Določbe direktive bi zato morale veljati za ladje, ki pristajajo na sidriščih in v pristaniščih.
The provisions of the directive should apply to ships calling at anchorages as well as at ports.
To stališče je v svojem predlogu zagovarjala tudi Komisija.
This was the position of the Commission in its proposal.
Poleg tega se ne zdi ravno smiselno sprejeti ukrep, ki bo pod določenimi pogoji omejil dostop do evropskih pristanišč, a bo hkrati omogočal, da iste ladje pristanejo na sidriščih.
Moreover there seems little point in adopting a measure which restricts access to Europe's ports under certain conditions but allows the same vessels to call at its anchorages.
Zaradi tega predlagamo spremembe, ki v direktivo ponovno vnašajo sidrišča tam, kjer jih je Svet odstranil.
Amendments are therefore proposed which restore anchorages to the Directive where Council has removed them.
S tem ostajamo dosledni v primerjavi z besedilom iz prve obravnave Parlamenta.
This is consistent with the Parliament's First Reading.
Neopravljeni inšpekcijski pregledi
Missed inspections
Svet je v predlog vnesel določbo, po kateri imajo države članice nekaj manevrskega prostora pri „neopravljenih inšpekcijskih pregledih“.
Council has amended the proposal to include a provision which allows Member States a margin of "missed inspections".
Ta prostor je preveč velikodušen in bi lahko onemogočil ustrezne napore za strog inšpekcijski režim v tistih pristaniščih, kjer pristaja nadpovprečno število problematičnih plovil.
The margin is too generous and could discourage adequate efforts to ensure the inspection regime is rigorous in those ports where a higher than average number of problem vessels call.
Svet na primer predlaga, da država članica izpolnjuje določbe direktive že, če inšpekcijskega pregleda ne opravi na 5 % ladij iz prve prednostne skupine z visokim profilom tveganja.
For example the Council proposes that a Member State is in compliance with the Directive if 5% of priority 1 vessels with a high risk profile calling at its ports are not inspected.
Poleg tega Svet predlaga, da te ladje pristanejo ponoči (opredeljeno kot obdobje, ki ni krajše od 7 ur in vključuje čas med polnočjo do 5. uro zjutraj).
Moreover the Council proposes that ships calling at night time (defined as any period of not less than 7 hours including the period from midnight to 5 am).
Glede na predlog Sveta bi lahko sklepali, da se dokončno ne prepove nobene ladje.
Under the Council's proposal it could be that no ship is definitively banned.
Parlament pa zastopa stališče, da je ladji mogoče prepovedati vplutje, če ji je bila trikrat izdana odločitev o zavrnitvi vstopa.
The Parliament position is that a ship may be banned if it has been subject to three refusals of access orders.
Da se ladji izda odločitev o zavrnitvi vstopa, mora biti na črnem ali sivem seznamu in je bila v zadnjih 36 mesecih vsaj trikrat zadržana.
To be subject to a refusal of access order a ship must be on the black or grey list, been detained at least three times in the preceding 36 months.
Glede na stališče Parlamenta bodo lastniki imeli ustrezno možnost, da ladje stalno vzdržujejo po veljavnih standardih.
Parliament's position therefore allows owners adequate opportunity to bring the vessel permanently up to standard.
Prepoved kot skrajno svarilo je potrebna, da bi preprečili pristajanje zarjavelih razbitin v naših pristaniščih.
Banning, as an ultimate deterrent, is necessary to ensure rust buckets no longer call at our ports.
Potrebno je torej še dodatno delo, poročevalka pa predlaga, da se osredotočimo na bistvena vprašanja, opisana zgoraj.
There is therefore work to be done and your rapporteur proposes focussing on the substantive issues as described above.
Predlagani pristop je uravnotežen, saj sprejema stališče Sveta povsod tam, kjer predlagane tehnične spremembe očitno krepijo inšpekcijski režim, hkrati pa ohranja tiste sestavine stališča Parlamenta, s katerimi bo režim učinkovitejši.
The suggested approach is a balanced one, taking on board the Council's position where manifestly the technical changes it proposes strengthen the inspection system but retaining those elements of the Parliament's position which will ensure the system will be effective.
Pomorska inšpekcija (predelava)
Port State control (recast version)
o odločitvah odbora za peticije v parlamentarnem letu 2007
on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the parliamentary year 2007
o odločitvah odbora za peticije v parlamentarnem letu 2007
on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during 2007
– ob upoštevanju svojih preteklih resolucij o posvetovanjih z odborom za peticije, zlasti tiste z dne 21. junija 2007 o rezultatih misije za ugotavljanje dejstev v španskih regijah Andaluzija, Valencija in Madrid na pobudo odbora za peticije
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions, notably its resolution of 21 June 2007 on the results of the fact-finding mission to the regions of Andalucía, Valencia and Madrid conducted on behalf of the Committee on Petitions
UL C 146 E, 12.06.08, str.
OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6‑0336/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0336/2008 ),
A. priznava edinstven pomen procesa vlaganja peticij, ki posameznikom omogoča, da Evropski parlament opozorijo na specifična vprašanja s področja delovanja Unije, ki jih neposredno zadevajo,
A. recognising the singular importance of the petitions process in allowing individuals the opportunity to draw to the attention of the European Parliament specific issues which are of direct concern to them covering the area of activity of the Union,
B. ker si mora Odbor za peticije vedno prizadevati za svojo večjo učinkovitost, da bi bolje služil državljanom EU in izpolnjeval njihova pričakovanja,
B. whereas the Committee on Petitions should always strive to improve its efficiency in order to better serve EU citizens and meet their expectations,
C. upošteva dejstvo, da kljub pomembnemu napredku pri razvoju struktur in politik Unije, doseženem v tem obdobju, državljani pogosto opažajo številne pomanjkljivosti pri uporabi politik in programov Unije, saj ti neposredno vplivajo nanje,
C. mindful of the fact that, in spite of considerable progress in the development of the structures and policies of the Union during this period, citizens often remain conscious of many shortcomings in the application of the policies and programmes of the Union as they affect them directly,
D. ker imajo v skladu s Pogodbo o ES državljani EU pravico naslavljati peticije na Evropski parlament, vendar pa lahko svoje pritožbe pošiljajo tudi drugim institucijam ali organom EU, zlasti Komisiji,
D. whereas, in accordance with the EC Treaty, EU citizens have the right to petition the European Parliament but they may also channel their complaints to other EU institutions or organs, notably the Commission,
E. ker ostajajo na nacionalni ravni prizadevanja za spodbujanje in zagotavljanje informacij o javni pravici do naslavljanja peticij na Parlament ključnega pomena, da se zbudi zanimanje javnosti in še zlasti prepreči zmeda glede različnih pritožbenih postopkov,
E. whereas efforts to promote and provide information on the public right to petition Parliament remain vital at national level, so as to awaken public interest and, in particular, prevent confusion over the various complaints procedures,
F. ker so za uporabo uredb in direktiv Skupnosti pristojne države članice, to pristojnost pa lahko, odvisno od svoje ustavne ureditve, prenesejo na regionalne ali lokalne politične organe,
F. whereas it is the responsibility of the Member States to apply Community regulations and directives, a responsibility which they may delegate to regional or local political authorities depending upon their own constitutional arrangements,
G. ker Parlament ob upoštevanju pomembnega načela subsidiarnosti legitimno izvaja demokratični pregled in nadzor politik Unije, da bi zagotovil pravilno izvajanje in razumevanje predpisov Unije ter doseganje namena, s katerim so pristojne institucije Unije o njih razpravljale in za katerega so jih oblikovale in sprejele,
G. whereas it is legitimate for Parliament to exercise democratic oversight and supervision of Union policies, bearing in mind the important principle of subsidiarity, in order to ensure that Union laws are properly implemented and understood and that they fulfil the purpose for which they were designed, debated and adopted by the competent institutions of the Union,