natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In končno, treba bo najti ustrezno ravnotežje med razširitvijo referenčne poročevalske populacije in zmanjšanjem bremena poročanja.
Finally, a good balance will have to be struck between the extension of the reference reporting population and the reduction of the reporting burden.
Določbe o zaupnosti
Confidentiality regimes
Varovanje zaupnih podatkov bi moralo biti v središču obstoječe uredbe tako kot v prihodnji uredbi o evropski statistiki.
As with the forthcoming regulation on European Statistics, the protection of confidential data should be at the core of the present regulation.
Nedvomno je varovanje zaupnosti posebnega pomena zlasti v zvezi z zaupnimi podatki v finančnem sektorju.
Undoubtedly, confidentiality safeguards are of particular importance when it comes to confidential data in the financial sector.
Neprimerna uporaba podatkov ali odtekanje podatkov bi lahko imelo resne posledice za stabilnost finančnih trgov.
Improper use of data or data leakages could have severe consequences for the stability of financial markets.
Zato poročevalec pozdravlja uvedbo določb o zaupnosti pri izmenjavi informacij znotraj Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in med njim ter Evropskim statističnim sistemom, ki odražajo določbe prihodnje uredbe o evropski statistiki.
Therefore, your rapporteur welcomes the introduction of confidentiality provisions for the exchange of information within the ESCB and between the ESCB and the ESS, mirroring the provisions of the forthcoming regulation on European Statistics.
Za utrditev ureditve zaupnosti Evropskega sistema centralnih bank bi se lahko razmislilo tudi o razširitvi okvira ECB o kakovosti statistike na celoten Evropski sistem centralnih bank.
In order to strengthen the ESCB confidentiality regime, it could also be envisaged to extend the ECB's Statistical Quality Framework to the whole of the ESCB system.
Evropski statistični sistem in Evropski sistem centralnih bank imata vsak svojo ureditev zaupnosti.
The ESS and the ESCB currently both have their own confidentiality regimes.
Poročevalka temu ne nasprotuje, saj to odraža njuni strukturi upravljanja in institucionalno neodvisnost ECB.
Your rapporteur has no objections to this situation as it reflects the respective governance structures and the institutional independence of the ECB.
Vendar je za preprečevanje težav v operativnem upravljanju potrebna bolj jasna razmejitev med njima.
However, in order to avoid difficulties in operational management, a clearer distinction should be made between them.
Dolgoročno pa bi si morala Evropski sistem centralnih bank in Evropski statistični sistem prizadevati za čim večjo uskladitev ureditev zaupnosti.
Furthermore, in the long run, the ESCB and ESS should strive to align their confidentiality regimes as much as possible.
Prav tako bi morala ureditev zaupnosti Evropskega sistema centralnih bank zagotoviti, da se izmenjava statističnih podatkov izvaja samo za statistične namene.
Finally, the ESCB confidentiality regime should also ensure that exchanged statistical information is only used for statistical purposes.
V tem kontekstu bi bila zaželena jasna razmejitev med uporabo statistike s strani Evropskega sistema centralnih bank za statistično poročanje na eni strani in za namene nadzora varnega in skrbnega poslovanja na drugi strani.
In this context a clear distinction seems desirable between the use of statistics by the ESCB for statistical reporting on the one hand and for purposes of prudential supervision on the other hand.
Četudi naj bi zaupnost ostala eno od osrednjih načel spremenjenega predloga, poročevalka meni, da sta transparentnost in javna dostopnost podatkov prav tako pomembni vprašanji.
However, even if confidentiality should remain one of the core principles of the amended proposal, your rapporteur considers that transparency and public availability of data are important issues as well.
Zato poročevalka meni, da je treba najti ustrezno ravnotežje med varovanjem zaupnosti in razkritjem podatkov raziskovalcem ali splošni javnosti.
Your rapporteur considers, therefore, that a good balance needs to be found between confidentiality safeguards and disclosure of data to researchers or to the general public.
Sodelovanje med Evropskim statističnim sistemom in Evropskim sistemom centralnih bank
Cooperation ESS/ESCB
V skladu s prihodnjo uredbo o evropski statistiki, katere cilj je okrepljeno sodelovanje med Evropskim statističnim sistemom in Evropskim sistemom centralnih bank, naj bi sodelovanje zagotovilo stroškovno učinkovitost, odpravilo podvajanje zbiranja podatkov in zmanjšalo splošno breme poročanja odgovornih.
As laid down in the forthcoming regulation on European statistics, which aims at a strengthened cooperation between the systems of the ESS and of the ESCB, this cooperation should ensure cost-efficiency, avoid the duplication of data collection and minimise the overall reporting burden on respondents.
Zato naj bi oba sistema izvajala statistična načela, kot je določeno v prihodnji uredbi o evropski statistiki, ter jih prilagodila ustreznim strokovnim funkcijam in področjem.
Therefore, both the ESS and the ESCB should implement the statistical principles as laid down in the forthcoming regulation on European statistics, adapting them to their respective functions and areas of expertise.
Prav tako bi si morala oba sistema prizadevati za obsežnejše skupno načrtovanje in določanje strateških ciljev za pripravo, razvoj ali razširjanje evropske statistike.
Also, both systems should aim at enhanced common programming and the setting of strategic objectives for the production, development and dissemination of European statistics.
Poročevalka predlaga vključitev sklicevanja na Okvir o kakovosti statistike v obstoječem osnutku uredbe.
Finally, your rapporteur recommends the introduction of a reference to the Statistical Quality Framework in the present draft regulation.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/15/ES o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/15/EC on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem .....................................................................8
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/15/ES o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0650 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0650 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 71 ter členov 137(2) in 251(2) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0354/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 71 and 137(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0354/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0120/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0120/2009 ),
(i) Direktiva 2002/15/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2002 o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu
(i) Directive 2002/15/ΕC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities
Direktiva 2002/15/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2002, ki je začela veljati 23. marca 2005, je pomenila pomemben napredek pri izboljšanju varovanja zdravja in varnosti voznega osebja v cestnoprometnem sektorju.
Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002, which entered into effect on 23 March 2005, was an important step towards improving health and safety protection of mobile workers in the road transport sector.
Ta direktiva je lex specialis direktive 2003/88/ES o delovnem času in dopolnjuje uredbo (ES) št. 561/2006 (UL E 102, 11.4.2006), ki določa skupna pravila o času vožnje in dolžini odmorov za voznike.
It is a lex specialis to the general Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC and supplements Regulation (EC) No. 561/2006 (OJ E 102, 11.4.2006) laying down common rules on driving times and rest periods for drivers.
Komisija je v skladu z direktivo 2002/15/ES, zlasti določbe, da bi se od 23. marca 2009 uporabljala za samozaposlene voznike, Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložila poročilo (KOM(2007)266 končno) o možnih posledicah vključitve oziroma izvzetja samozaposlenih voznikov s področja uporabe te direktive.
In accordance with Directive 2002/15/ΕC and in particular the provision that it would apply to self-employed drivers from 23 Μarch 2009, the Commission submitted to the European Parliament and the Council a report (CΟΜ (2007) 266 final) presenting the likely consequences of the inclusion or exclusion of self-employed drivers from the scope of the directive.
V tem poročilu so obravnavane tudi posledice izvajanja določb te direktive o nočnem delu.
The report also assesses the consequences of implementing its night-time provisions.
Poleg tega so obravnavane bolj splošne posledice izvajanja te direktive na cestnoprometno varnost, konkurenčni pogoji, struktura poklica in socialni vidiki.
Furthermore, it investigates the more general effects of the implementation of the directive on road safety, the conditions of competition, the structure of the profession and social aspects.
Ugotovitve so naslednje:
It found that:
(a) Ni bilo tehtnega primera za vključitev samozaposlenih voznikov v področje direktive.
(a) There was not a decisive case for including self-employed drivers in the scope of the directive.
(b) Razlika med samozaposlenimi vozniki in voznim osebjem je bila nejasna, zaradi česar je bila večja možnost pojava „lažnih“ samozaposlenih voznikov, ki niso vezani na delodajalca s pogodbo o zaposlovanju, zato da ne spadajo v področje uporabe direktive, vendar ne morejo imeti poslovnih stikov z več strankami.
(b) The distinction between self-employed drivers and mobile workers was unclear, and this increased the risk of the phenomenon of ‘false’ self-employed drivers, who, in order not to fall within the scope of the Directive, are not tied to an employer by an employment contract, but do not have the freedom to have relations with several customers.
Komisija meni, da je ta predlog ekonomsko in socialno nesorazmeren ter nepotreben.
According to the Commission, this proposal is economically and socially disproportionate and unnecessary.
(IΙ) Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktive 2002/15/ES o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu (KOM(2008)650).
(IΙ) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/15/EC on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (COM(2008)650).
Po posvetovanjih z zainteresiranimi stranmi in oceni učinka, da bi se izognili upravnim obremenitvam ter obenem spodbujali uresničevanje ciljev prometne politike, se je izkazalo, da je najboljša politična opcija obravnavani predlog o spremembi direktive 2002/15/ES.
After stakeholder consultations and an impact assessment with a view to avoiding unnecessary administrative burden and at the same time promoting the EU transport policy objectives, the proposal under review amending Directive 2002/15/ΕC was considered the best policy option.
Po mnenju Komisije ostaja splošni cilj direktive nespremenjen – varovanje zdravja in varnosti delavcev v cestnem prometu, izkrivljanje konkurence ter upravni in ekonomski stroški za države članice pa so manjši.
According to the Commission, there has been no change in the overall purpose of the directive, namely protection of the health and safety of road transport workers, while distortions in competition and administrative and economic costs for Member States are reduced.
(a) Pojasnitev področja uporabe
(a) Clarification of scope
– Izključi se resnično samozaposleno vozno osebje (črtanje člena 3(e)).
- Εxclusion of genuinely self-employed mobile workers (deletion of Article 3(e));
– Direktiva velja za vso vozno osebje in tiste delavce, ki ne morejo sami urejati svojih poklicnih dejavnosti, namreč za „lažne“ samozaposlene voznike (člena 2(1) in 3(d)).
- Application of directive to all mobile workers and those who are not free to organise their working activities, namely the ‘false’ self-employed drivers (Article 2, paragraph 1, Article 3, paragraph (d));
– Črta se opredelitev delovnega časa za samozaposlene voznike in doda se natančnejša opredelitev voznega osebja.
- Deletion of the definition of ‘working time’ for self-employed drivers and a more precise definition of ‘mobile workers’ is added.
(b) Nočno delo (člen 3(i))
(b) Night work (Article 3, (i))
– Predlaga se opredelitev nočnega dela, za katero Komisija navaja, da velja v praksi: ponovno se uvede dve uri kot minimalno trajanje nočnega dela.
- A definition of night work is proposed which, according to the Commission, is applicable in practice: two hours as the minimum period of night work is reinserted.
– Člen 11(a) (novo) uvaja skupna načela za zagotavljanje boljše preglednosti in učinkovitosti izvrševanja v državah članicah.
- Article 11(a) (new) introduces common principles designed to ensure greater transparency and effectiveness of national enforcement regimes.
– Poziva se k tesnejšemu sodelovanju med izvršnimi organi držav članic.
- Closer cooperation is called for between Member States’ enforcement authorities.
– Predlaga se tudi podpora Komisije za spodbujanje dialoga med pristojnimi organi.
- Commission support is also proposed to facilitate the dialogue between the bodies concerned.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta
Position of European Parliament
– Poleg ukrepov za strukturno posodobitev poročevalka priznava, da obstaja nevarnost pojava lažnih samozaposlenih voznikov zaradi različne razlage direktive 2002/15/ES.
- Apart from structural updating measures, your rapporteur recognises a danger that the phenomenon of ‘false’ self-employed mobile workers will arise owing to differing interpretations of Directive 2002/15/ΕC.
– Poročevalka tudi meni, da so odnosi med lažnimi samozaposlenimi delavci in strankami poslovni.
- Your rapporteur defines relations between ‘false’ self-employed workers and customers as commercial.
– Združuje opredelitev nočnega dela in nadomestilo za skupno število delovnih ur ter ne podpira opredelitve dveh ur kot minimalnega časa nočnega dela v skladu s členom 7(1), ki določa, da vozniki, ki opravljajo nočno delo, ne smejo delati več kot deset od 24 ur.
- She combines a definition of night work and compensation for overall working hours and does not accept the definition of two hours as the minimum period of night work, as provided for in Article 7(1), which provides that drivers performing night work may not work more than ten hours per 24 hour period.
– Meni, da vzpostavitev sistemov izmenjave informacij ni v skladu s cilji te direktive.
- She takes the view that the establishment of systems of exchange of information are disproportionate compared to the objectives of the directive.
– Poziva k olajšanju in izboljšanju dostopa do informacij o socialni zakonodaji na področju cestnega prometa.
- She calls for the facilitation and improvement of access to information concerning social legislation in the field of road transport.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/15/ES o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/15/EC on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities
Direktiva 2002/15/ES ureja delovni čas oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu.
Directive 2002/15/EC regulates the working hours of people performing mobile road transport activities.
V glavnem obravnava vozne delavce, ki so zaposleni v podjetjih, od 23. marca 2009 pa bo veljala tudi za samozaposlene voznike podjetnike, razen če bo pred tem datumom sprejeta odločitev, da se slednja kategorija izvzame s področja uporabe direktive.
It primarily concerns mobile workers employed by undertakings, but from 23 March 2009 will also concern self-employed drivers, who are entrepreneurs in their own right, unless it is decided before that date to exclude the latter category from the scope of the Directive.
Poleg določb o času vožnje in počitka za voznike iz uredbe št. 561/1006 (prej 3820/85) so v direktivi navedene tudi določbe, ki se nanašajo na delovni čas.
The provisions concerning working hours contained in this Directive are additional to the provisions concerning driving hours and rest periods of mobile road transport workers laid down in Regulation 561/1006 (previously 3820/85).
Ločevanje med voznimi delavci in samozaposlenimi vozniki je v praksi povzročilo težave zaradi „lažnih“ samozaposlenih voznikov.
The distinction between mobile workers and self-employed drivers has caused problems in practice, because of the emergence of 'false' self-employed drivers.
Gre za osebe, ki so uradno registrirane kot samozaposleni podjetniki in tudi opravljajo dejavnost samozaposlenega voznika, v resnici pa delajo samo za eno drugo podjetje.
These are people who are formally registered as self-employed entrepreneurs and operate as self-employed drivers but de facto work for only one other undertaking.
V resnici delujejo, kot da bi bili zaposleni v tem podjetju.
In reality they function as if they were employees of this other undertaking.
Za rešitev tega problema Komisija v svojem predlogu KOM(2008)0650 predlaga spremembo opredelitve „voznega delavca“, da bi v prihodnosti bili vključeni tudi „lažni“ samozaposleni vozniki, ki bi prav tako morali delovati v skladu z določbami o delovnem času.
In order to solve this problem, the Commission proposes in its proposal COM(2008)0650 that the definition of 'mobile worker' be amended so as in future also to include 'false' self-employed drivers, so that they would likewise have to comply with the provisions concerning working hours.
Komisija meni, da v področje uporabe direktive ni treba vključiti resnično samozaposlenih voznikov.
The Commission concludes that it is not worthwhile also to include genuinely self-employed drivers within the scope of the Directive.
– ne morejo svobodno organizirati svojega dela ali– njihov dohodek ni neposredno odvisen od dobička ali
- who do not have the freedom to organise their work, or- whose income does not depend directly on the profits made, or
– ne morejo delati za več strank.
- who cannot work with several customers.
Kot drugo, Komisija predlaga obsežnejšo opredelitev pojma „nočno delo“.
Secondly, the Commission proposes interpreting the term 'night work' more broadly.
Komisija zdaj predlaga, da bi delo bilo opredeljeno kot nočno delo samo, ko dejansko opravljanje dela traja vsaj dve uri v tem obdobju.
The Commission now proposes that work be defined as night work only if actual work has been performed for at least two hours during that period.
Kot tretje, Komisija predlaga nov člen o izvrševanju.
Thirdly, the Commission proposes inserting a new article on enforcement.
Pri tem je treba upoštevati, da se pravila o delovnem času izvršujejo pristojni inšpektorati v državi, kjer ima podjetje svoj sedež.
Here it should be borne in mind that enforcement of working hours regulations is carried out in the country of establishment by the competent inspectorate based there.
Delovni čas zato ne bo nadzorovan v sklopu cestnih inšpekcij, ki se lahko izvajajo tudi v drugih državah članicah, ampak samo v državi s sedežem podjetja.
Working hours will therefore not be monitored as part of roadside inspections, which may also be performed in other Member States, but only in the country of establishment.
Stališče in predlogi sprememb pripravljavca mnenja
Rapporteur's standpoint and amendments
Pripravljavec mnenja se na splošno strinja s predlogom Komisije.
By and large, your rapporteur endorses the Commission proposal.
Obravnavanje „lažnih“ samozaposlenih voznikov kot zaposlenih oseb, za katere veljajo omejitve glede njihovega delovnega časa, ker so tudi dejansko zaposleni v drugem podjetju, predstavlja pozitiven razvoj.
It is a positive development for 'false' self-employed drivers to be treated as employees with restrictions on their working hours, as they are also de facto working as employees for another undertaking.
Pripravljavec mnenja podpira tudi stališče Komisije, da ta direktiva naj ne bi veljala za resnično samozaposlene voznike.
Your rapporteur also supports the Commission's view that genuinely self-employed drivers should not fall under this Directive.
Zato je prav, da Komisija v ta namen predlaga spremembo člena 2(1).
It is therefore right that the Commission proposal amends Article 2(1) to this effect.
Pripravljavec mnenja vseeno globoko obžaluje, da je bil predlog Komisije objavljen tako pozno.
Nonetheless, your rapporteur deeply deplores the fact that this Commission proposal has been published so late.
Tudi če bi Evropski parlament in Svet dosegla sporazum med hitro prvo obravnavo, spremenjena direktiva ne bi začela veljati pred 23. marcem 2009.
Even if the European Parliament and the Council were to reach agreement in the course of a rapid first reading, the amended Directive could not enter into force before 23 March 2009.
Pripravljavec mnenja države članice poziva, naj tudi po tem roku izvajajo obstoječo direktivo, dokler ne bo začela veljati spremenjena direktiva.
Pending the entry into force of the amended Directive, your rapporteur calls upon the Member States to continue implementation in the spirit of the existing Directive after 23 March 2009 until the amended Directive enters into force.
V zvezi z nočnim delom se pripravljavec mnenja strinja s Komisijo, da je potrebna večja prilagodljivost, kakor jo dopušča obstoječa direktiva.
With regard to night work, your rapporteur agrees with the Commission that greater flexibility is required than permitted by the existing Directive.
Glede na sedanjo direktivo ni nujno, da je ta daljši od štirih ur, kar pomeni, da bi bil pri prekoračiti za dve uri nočni čas dejansko skrajšan na dve uri.
As the Directive currently stands, it need be no longer than four hours, which means that with an overrun of two hours it may de facto be reduced to two hours.
Kot zadnje, pripravljavec mnenja meni, da bi za uravnovešeno razporeditev delovnega časa in časa počitka čez teden bilo primerno spremeniti opredelitev pojma „teden“.
Lastly, your rapporteur considers that, in the interests of a balanced distribution of working hours and rest periods over the week, it would be desirable to amend the definition of 'week'.
Da bi vzpostavili določen čas za počitek, ki bi pripomogel k boljšemu delu, varnosti v cestnem prometu in bil koristen za javno blaginjo, bi bilo iz opredelitve treba izključiti večji del nedelje.
In order to create a fixed rest period which will be of benefit to the quality of work, road safety and public well-being, the greater part of Sunday should be excluded from this definition.
(1a) Vozni delavci, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006, spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive.
(1a) Mobile workers who do not fall under the scope of application of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 should fall within the scope of application of this Directive.