natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
F. ker je krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja temelj pri oblikovanju skupnega azilnega sistema in ker praktično in redno sodelovanje med različnimi upravnimi ravnmi v državah članicah, ki opravljajo podobne naloge, ki se izvajajo pregledno in z ustreznimi funkcijami za poročanje, vključno s poročanjem Evropskemu parlamentu, predstavlja najboljšo možnost vzpostavitve takšnega zaupanja; ker je krepitev vzajemnega zaupanja potrebno za zagotavljanje kakovosti in povečanje zaupanja javnosti v upravljanje na azilnem področju, s čimer se omogoči manj kontradiktoren in učinkovitejši postopek,
F. whereas strengthening mutual trust is a cornerstone of the process of establishing a common asylum system, and whereas practical and regular cooperation between the various administrative levels in the Member States which have similar responsibilities, conducted in a transparent manner with the right reporting functions, including reporting to the European Parliament, is the best method of establishing such trust; whereas strengthening mutual trust is necessary to ensure quality and also to increase public confidence in the management of asylum, thereby facilitating a less adversarial and more efficient process,
G. z izrecnim poudarkom, da je učinkovito izvajanje azilne politike odvisno od prizadevanj za dosego več ciljev, ki se med seboj dopolnjujejo, kot so boljša kakovost odločanja, hitra in varna obdelava prošenj za zaščito, kot tudi organizacija informacijskih kampanj v državah izvora in tranzita, ki pojasnjujejo obseg zakonitega priseljevanja, dogovore o zagotavljanju statusa begunca ali humanitarne zaščite, nevarnosti trgovine z ljudmi, zlasti ženskami in mladoletniki brez spremstva, ter posledice nezakonitega priseljevanja in nepriznavanja statusa begunca,
G. whereas the effective implementation of asylum policy is contingent on efforts to achieve a number of complementary objectives, such as improving the quality of decision-making, the prompt and secure processing of applications for protection and the organisation of information campaigns in countries of origin and transit which make clear the scope for legal immigration, the arrangements for securing refugee status or humanitarian protection, the dangers involved in trafficking in human beings, in particular women and unaccompanied minors, and the consequences both of illegal immigration and of denial of refugee status,
H. ker bi se lahko bilo smiselno, za boljšo kakovost pri obdelavi prošenj za azil in s tem za zmanjšanje števila sodnih postopkov in postopkovnih zamud, opreti na zadevne organizacije, recimo UNHCR, ki je razvila metodo podpore oblasti pri njihovih prizadevanjih za boljšo kakovost odločanja (Quality Initiative),
H. whereas, with a view to improving the processing of asylum applications, and thus reducing the number of court proceedings and procedural delays, it may make sense to draw on support from relevant organisations, for example UNHCR, which has developed a method intended to support authorities in their efforts to improve the quality of their decision-making (Quality Initiative),
I. ker je treba, kot je izjavil Svet za pravosodje in notranje zadeve 27. in 28. aprila 2006, podpreti uveljavitev enotnega postopka, da bi se izognili zamudam in s tem konkretno prispevali k večji učinkovitosti postopkov,
I. whereas, as the Justice and Home Affairs Council stated on 27 and 28 April 2006, efforts must be made to introduce a uniform procedure with a view to preventing delays and thus making a practical contribution to improving the effectiveness of the procedures,
J. ker kljub skupnim temeljnim ukrepom, ki so bili sprejeti na področju azila od začetka veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe naprej, države članice na nacionalni ravni še naprej izvajajo ukrepe in sprejemajo sklepe, ki vplivajo na druge države članice, zlasti v zvezi z zagotavljanjem mednarodne zaščite,
J. whereas, despite the existence of a common set of basic asylum-related measures adopted since the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, at national level the Member States continue to implement measures or take decisions which have implications for the other Member States, in particular as regards the granting of international protection,
K. ker člen 29 Direktive 2005/85/ES določa pripravo minimalnega skupnega seznama tretjih držav, ki veljajo za varne države izvora, in ker je obžalovanja vredno, da ta seznam še vedno ni pripravljen in da Svet pri sprejemanju te direktive ni upošteval mnenja Parlamenta, zaradi česar je sedaj v teku postopek za razveljavitev Direktive 2005/85/ES pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti; ker bi bil takšen seznam, ki bi ga bilo treba sprejeti s postopkom soodločanja, ključni dejavnik pri uvedbi skupnega azilnega sistema in pri hitrih sklepih glede statusa; ker uvrstitev države na ta seznam ne pomeni, da bodo prosilci za azil iz te države avtomatično zavrnjeni, temveč, da bo v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo z dne 28. julija 1951 o statusu beguncev, kot jo je spremenil newyorški protokol z dne 31. januarja 1967 (Ženevska konvencija), vsaka prošnja obravnavana individualno,
K. whereas Article 29 of Directive 2005/85/EC provides for the drawing-up of a minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin, and whereas it is unfortunate on the one hand that this list has still not been drawn up and on the other hand that the Council did not take into account Parliament's opinion when adopting that Directive, for which reason an action for annulment of Directive 2005/85/CE is now pending before the Court of Justice of the European Communities (the Court of Justice); whereas such a list, which should be adopted under the codecision procedure, would clearly be a key factor in the introduction of a common asylum system and in prompt status decisions; whereas the inclusion of a country on that list does not mean automatically that asylum seekers from that country will be basically refused asylum, but rather that, according to the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the status of refugees, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (Geneva Convention), there is an individual assessment of every single application,
L. ker je obžalovanja vredno, da se Svetu ni zdelo potrebno pri pripravi seznama varnih držav izvora uporabiti postopek soodločanja, in z zanimanjem pričakujoč sodbo, ki jo bo o tem vprašanju sprejelo Sodišče,
L. whereas it is a matter for regret that the Council did not see fit to employ the codecision procedure in connection with the drawing-up of the list of safe countries of origin, and whereas the judgment which the Court of Justice will hand down on this issue is awaited with interest,
M. ker morajo imeti države članice na voljo kakovostne informacije o trenutnih nevarnostih v državah izvora, če naj zagotovijo zanesljivost in pravičnost postopkov, ki zagotavljajo spoštovanje pravic prosilcev za azil,
M. whereas the Member States must have high-quality information about current dangers in countries of origin at their disposal if they are to guarantee reliable and fair procedures which ensure that asylum seekers’ rights are respected,
N. ker se z nasiljem nad ženskam in grožnjami z nasiljem krši pravico do življenja, varnosti, svobode, dostojanstva in telesne in duševne integritete ter resno ogroža telesno in duševno zdravje žrtev,
N. whereas violence and the threat of violence against women constitute a breach of the right to life, safety, freedom, dignity and physical and emotional integrity, as well as being a serious threat to the physical and mental health of the victims of such violence,
O. ker je navkljub tehničnim in političnim težavam, ki ovirajo skupno uporabo občutljivih informacij o državah izvora, vzpostavitev skupne zbirke podatkov o državah izvora dolgoročno nujna, da se bodo lahko vse pristojne osebe pri obravnavi posameznih prošenj oprle na iste informacije,
O. whereas although there are technical and political problems which hamper the sharing of sensitive information about countries of origin, a joint database on countries of origin must surely ultimately be set up, so that all persons, involved in the proceedure can rely on the same information when dealing with an individual application,
P. ker je za izboljšanje postopkov odločanja treba povišati raven usposabljanja javnih uslužbencev, ki sprejemajo te odločitve,
P. whereas if decision-making procedures are to be improved the level of training of the civil servants who take the decisions will have to be raised,
Q. ker je najprimernejši postopek, ki Sodišču omogoča zagotavljanje enotnosti prava Skupnosti, v členu 234 PES predvideni postopek za predhodno odločanje, in ker je pomemben del tega postopka tudi načelo, da lahko vsako nacionalno sodišče stopi v stik s Sodiščem; ker pa je na podlagi odstopanja od tega načela v skladu s členom 68 PES Sodišče na žalost pristojno za razlago določb na področju azila le takrat, kadar mu vprašanje predloži nacionalno sodišče zadnje stopnje,
Q. whereas the procedure best suited to enabling the Court of Justice to guarantee the unity of Community law is the preliminary ruling procedure laid down in Article 234 of the EC Treaty, and whereas a key component of that procedure is the principle that any national court may ask the Court of Justice for a ruling; whereas, however, on the basis of the derogation from that principle laid down in Article 68 of the EC Treaty the Court of Justice is unfortunately empowered to interpret asylum-related provisions only if consulted by the national court of final instance,
2. ponovno poudarja potrebo po proaktivni skupni azilni politiki EU na podlagi obveznosti o sprejemu prosilcev za azil ter ob upoštevanju načela nevračanja; v zvezi s tem opozarja na temeljno vlogo močne skupne zunanje in varnostne politike, ki spodbuja in varuje demokracijo ter temeljne pravice;
Reaffirms the need for a proactive common EU asylum policy, based on the obligation to admit asylum seekers and on respect for the principle of non-refoulement; recalls, in this respect, the fundamental role of a strong Common Foreign and Security Policy, promoting and safeguarding democracy and fundamental rights;
5. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj si prizadevata za uvedbo enotnega postopka v vseh državah članicah, saj bo tako sprejemanje odločitev pravično in učinkovito, da se zagotovi, da je status begunca čim prej odobren vsem osebam, ki so do njega upravičene;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to work to bring about the introduction in all Member States of a single procedure which makes for fair and effective decision-making, in order to ensure that refugee status is granted as quickly as possible to all those who are entitled to it;
7. izrecno opozarja, da je eden od ciljev sprejetih inštrumentov, povezanih z azilom, omejiti t.i. "drugotna" gibanja; države članice poziva, naj si že zdaj konkretno prizadevajo za čim večje zbliževanje svojih azilnih politik;
Emphasises that one of the objectives of the asylum-related instruments adopted is to curb so-called 'secondary' movements; urges the Member States to take practical steps now to achieve the highest possible degree of convergence among their respective asylum policies;
9. meni, da je treba biti pozoren na dejstvo, da morajo biti javni uslužbenci, ki so pristojni za odločanje o dodelitvi statusa begunca, primerno usposobljeni na podlagi evropskega učnega načrta z možnostjo uvedbe obvezne kvalifikacije ali obvezne stopnje kvalifikacije;
Considers that due note should be taken of the fact that civil servants responsible for decisions granting refugee status must have proper training on the basis of a European curriculum, with the possibility of obligatory qualifications or an obligatory level of qualification being introduced;
11. poziva – potem ko so bila uporabljena vsa pravna sredstva – k pravičnemu in hitremu izvajanju ukrepov glede ljudi, ki jim ni bil dodeljen status begunca ali jim je bil ta status odvzet, ob polnem spoštovanju človekovega dostojanstva in temeljnih pravic oseb, ki jih je treba vrniti; nadalje s tem v zvezi poziva k čimprejšnji uvedbi postopka EU za vračanje;
Calls - once judicial remedies have been exhausted - for measures applicable to persons who have not been granted refugee status or whose refugee status has been revoked, to be implemented quickly and fairly with full respect for the human dignity and fundamental rights of the persons who have to be repatriated; calls furthermore in this respect for the establishment in the shortest possible term of a EU repatriation procedure;
13. poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej odpravi tehnične in politične ovire pri uvedbi enotne zbirke podatkov o državah izvora; meni, da bi morala zbirka podatkov EU delovati kot odprt sistem, da se bodo lahko vse pristojne osebe pri obravnavi posameznih prošenj oprle na iste informacije; upa, da se bo za problem večjezičnosti našla praktična rešitev;
Calls on the Commission to overcome as quickly as possible the technical and political problems involved in introducing a joint database containing information about countries of origin; considers that an EU database should work as an open system, so that all personsinvolved in the proceedure can rely on the same information when dealing with an individual application; hopes that a pragmatic solution can be found to the problem of multilingualism;
16. poziva države članice k polnemu sodelovanju z UNHCR, k ustrezni podpori tega organa in k uvedbi pobude "Quality Initiative" ter k objavi rezultatov te pobude, tako da bodo najboljše prakse pri obdelavi prošenj za mednarodno zaščito postale znane in da se bo spodbujala njihova raba;
Calls on the Member States to cooperate fully with UNHCR, to provide it with the appropriate support and to carry out a ‘Quality Initiative’ exercise and publish the results of that initiative, so as to familiarise people with and encourage the use of best practices with regard to the processing of applications for international protection;
18. pozdravlja ukrepe, ki jih namerava sprejeti Komisija za podporo tistim državam članicam, ki so zelo obremenjene, da bodo te države lahko rešile težave v zvezi s sprejemanjem prosilcev za azil in preverjanjem prošenj za azil, zlasti pozdravlja predlog za pošiljanje strokovnih ekip , ki vključujejo strokovnjake iz različnih držav članic;
Welcomes the measures planned by the Commission to support those Member States which are under severe pressure, so that they can cope with problems relating to the reception of asylum seekers and the assessment of asylum applications; welcomes, in particular and above all, the proposal to send teams of experts comprising members from different Member States;
Dokument Sveta 13272/06. ter spodbuja razpravo o potrebi po določitvi postopka, prilagojenega posebnim značilnostim zadev na področju azila in priseljevanja;
Council Document 13272/06. and encourages discussion on the need for a procedure that is adapted to the specific nature of cases in the field of asylum and immigration;
Prvi del uvedbe skupnega azilnega sistema se je zaključil 1. decembra 2005 s sprejetjem štirih instrumentov, predvidenih v členu 63(1) PES.
The first phase of the introduction of the common asylum system was completed with the adoption, on 1 December 2005, of the four instruments provided for in Article 63(1) of the EC Treaty.
Sedaj gre torej za utrditev uvedenih struktur, da bi lahko prešli na drugi del sistema, ki predvideva uvedbo skupnega azilnega sistema in enoten status oseb, ki so priznane za begunce ali ki jim je dodeljena subsidiarna zaščita.
The aim now, therefore, must be to consolidate the arrangements which have been introduced so that the transition can be made to the second phase of the system, which will involve the introduction of a common asylum system and uniform status for those persons who are recognised as refugees or who are granted subsidiary protection.
V Haaškem programu, sprejetem 4. in 5. novembra 2005, je Evropski svet opozoril, da bi se morala azilna politika sedaj opreti na tri glavne stebre, in sicer uvedbo enotnega postopka, skupno uporabo podatkov o državah izvora in krepitev sodelovanja med državami članicami, zlasti da bi pomagali tistim državam članicam, ki so zaradi svoje geografske lege zelo obremenjene, bolje obvladovati te obremenitve.
In the Hague Programme of 4 and 5 November 2005 the European Council pointed out that asylum policy should now have three main components, namely the introduction of a uniform procedure, the sharing of information about countries of origin and closer cooperation among the Member States, in particular in order to help those Member States which are under particular pressure, by virtue of their geographical situation, to cope more effectively with that pressure.
Da bi dosegli te cilje in prešli na drugi del uvedbe azilnega sistema, je treba podpirati predvsem praktično sodelovanje med državami članicami, s končnim ciljem doseči večjo kakovost odločanja, ki bi moralo biti po mnenju poročevalca hitrejše, pravičnejše in zanesljivejše.
If these objectives are to be achieved, and the transition to the second phase of the asylum system is to be made, above all there is a need to foster practical cooperation among the Member States, with the ultimate objective of improving the quality of decision-making, which, in your rapporteur's view, should be quicker, fairer and more reliable.
Krepitev tega praktičnega sodelovanja je predmet sporočila Komisije, na katero se nanaša to poročilo.
Stepping up this practical cooperation is the subject of the Commission communication dealt with in this report.
S tem v zvezi se je poročevalec lotil nekaterih vidikov, ki bi lahko pomenili odločilen prispevek k boljšemu sodelovanju in s tem tudi odločanju na področju azilne politike.
In that connection, your rapporteur has identified a number of aspects which could make a decisive contribution to improving cooperation and, hence, decision-making in the sphere of asylum policy.
Ti vidiki so navedeni v nadaljevanju.
Those aspects are set out in the following paragraphs.
Enoten postopek
Uniform procedure
Z enotnim postopkom bi bilo sprejemanje odločitev hitrejše, zato bi bilo treba podpreti njegovo uvedbo.
A uniform procedure will speed up decision-making and its introduction should therefore be encouraged.
V večini držav članic je že uveden enoten postopek, ki na enem mestu zbere preverjanje meril za dodelitev statusa begunca in meril za dodelitev subsidiarne zaščite.
In most Member States a uniform procedure has already been introduced which combines in one operation the assessment of applications of the basis of the criteria for granting refugee status and those for granting access to subsidiary protection.
To je pohvalno, saj je praviloma le malo verjetno, da bo za osebo, ki je vložila prošnjo za dodelitev mednarodne zaščite, mogoče presoditi, ali je njena prošnja v skladu z merili Ženevske konvencije ali drugih oblik mednarodne zaščite.
This is entirely laudable, in that as a rule a person who has submitted an application to be granted international protection is hardly likely to be in a position to determine whether his or her application is consistent with the criteria laid down in the Geneva Convention or those governing other forms of international protection.
Ta pristop je tudi racionalnejši, saj odločitev sprejme le en organ, ki pri tem preveri izpolnjevanje vseh meril za dodelitev mednarodne zaščite, s čimer se prepreči potreba po vložitvi več prošenj pri različnih organih, ki bi presojali podobne stvari.
This approach is also more rational in that one single body takes a decision and, in so doing, assesses compliance with all the criteria governing the granting of international protection, thereby sparing the applicant the need to submit applications to several bodies which all then assess the same basic set of facts.
Skupna zbirka podatkov
A joint database
Kakovost odločitev, sprejetih na prvi stopnji, je odvisna od kakovosti informacij, na katere so te odločitve oprte.
The quality of the decisions taken at first instance depends on the quality of the information on which such decisions are based.
Zaradi tega je treba izboljšati zbiranje informacij o državah izvora, da pa bi čim bolj uskladili merila držav članic za odločanje, je treba paziti, da imajo vse države članice na voljo iste informacije.
The way in which information about countries of origin is compiled must therefore be improved and, with a view to harmonising as far as possible the decision-making criteria employed by the Member States, care must be taken to ensure that all Member States have the same information at their disposal.
Skupna uporaba dosegljivih informacij o državah izvora je še nujnejša zaradi razlik v metodah posameznih držav članic pri zbiranju teh informacij.
The sharing of available information about countries of origin is made all the more necessary by the fact that the means used to compile such information differ from one Member State to the next.
Nekatere države so na tem področju sestavile visoko razvite zbirke podatkov, ki so na voljo pristojnim osebam, medtem ko druge nimajo na voljo svojih virov podatkov in se zato zanašajo na zunanje vire, npr. na nevladne organizacije in na UNHCR.
Some have created sophisticated databases to be used by their decision-makers, others do not have their own sources of information and therefore rely on outside providers, e.g. non-governmental organisations and the UNHCR.
Da bi zagotovili večjo doslednost odločitev, bi bilo brez dvoma nujno opreti odločitve na iste podatke.
In order to guarantee more consistent decision-making, however, decisions should ideally be based on identical information.
Pri tem bi šlo namreč za to, kakor predlaga tudi Komisija, da bi pristojne nacionalne oblasti pripravile skupne smernice za zbiranje in analizo informacij, tako da bi lahko vzpostavili evropsko zbirko podatkov o državah izvora na podlagi enotnih standardov Skupnosti.
As the Commission suggests, the aim would be to draw up joint guidelines for the collection and analysis of information by the relevant national authorities so that a European database containing information about countries of origin can be set up on the basis of joint Community standards.
Usposabljanje javnih uslužbencev
Training for civil servants
Če je cilj boljše odločanje, je treba jasno paziti, da imajo osebe, ki so pristojne za sprejemanje sklepov, zahtevane veščine in znanja, torej da so visoko usposobljene.
If the aim is to improve decision-making, care must naturally be taken to ensure that the persons actually responsible for that decision-making have the requisite skills and are provided with high-quality training.
V tem oziru je treba pozdraviti dejstvo, da so nekatere države, kot sta recimo Združeno kraljestvo in Avstrija, prevzele pobudo in se obrnile na organ, ki je specializiran za področje azila, UNHCR, ter ga prosile za pomoč pri presoji vsakodnevne prakse obdelave prošenj za azil in za konkretne predloge, kako izboljšati vodenje.
In that connection, it is welcome that some countries, such as the United Kingdom and Austria, have taken the initiative and turned to a body with specialist knowledge in the asylum sphere, the UNHCR, asking it to help them by assessing the practices they employ in the day-to-day processing of asylum applications and making practical proposals for improvements.
Tu bi lahko šlo za zgled, ki bi lahko pripeljal do izdelave vodnika o "zanesljivih metodah".
This is an example which might be followed and which could lead to the drafting of a manual of ‘proven methods’.
Poročevalec pozdravlja različne ukrepe, sprejete v okviru Eurasila
Your rapporteur welcomes various measures taken under the auspices of Eurasil
Mreža EU za javne uslužbence, ki se ukvarjajo z azilom, je bila ustanovljena leta 2002. , ki si prizadevajo za uskladitev kvalifikacij javnih uslužbencev, ki se ukvarjajo s področjem azila, in podpira širšo uveljavitev teh ukrepov.
The EU network for asylum practitioners was set up in 2002. to harmonise the qualifications which civil servants working in the asylum sphere must have and calls for these measures to be more broadly implemented.