natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Delegacija Evropskega parlamenta v spravnem odboru
European Parliament delegation to the Conciliation Committee
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6–0105/2007 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 ),
451. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0621 )
451. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0621 )
Sprejeta besedila , 24.10.2006, P6_TA(2006)0431 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts Adopted, 24.10.2006, P6_TA(2006)0431 . on the Council common position
UL C 238 E, 3.10.2006, str.
OJ C 238 E, 3.10.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2006)0759
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2006)0759 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(5) pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Article 251(5) of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v spravnem odboru ( A6‑0180/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0180/2007 ),
Cilj uredbe o finančnem instrumentu za okolje (LIFE+), ki temelji na členu 175(1) pogodbe, je uvesti enotni finančni instrument za okolje, ki bo spodbujal zlasti prednostne naloge šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa.
The Aim of the Regulation concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+), which is based on Article 175(1) of the Treaty, is to introduce a single financial instrument targeting the environment to support in particular the priorities of the 6th Environment Action Programme.
Ta program, ki bo veljal za obdobje 2007-2013, bo v krajši in poenostavljeni obliki pokrival večino že obstoječih programov generalnega direktorata za okolje, kot so program LIFE III, program za trajnostni razvoj naselij, program nevladnih organizacij in program Forest Focus.
This programme, which will run from 2007 until 2013, will cover most of the ongoing programmes currently managed by DG Environment, such as the LIFE III programme, the sustainable urban development programme, the NGO programme and Forest Focus in a streamlined and simplified manner.
Parlament je na drugi obravnavi 24. oktobra 2006 sprejel 31 predlogov sprememb k skupnemu stališču Sveta.
At second reading, on 24 October 2006, the Parliament adopted 31 amendments to the Council's common position.
Večina 31 predlogov sprememb Parlamenta iz druge obravnave se je nanašala na vodenje proračuna programa LIFE+, kar je bilo tudi najspornejše vprašanje.
Most of the Parliament's 31 second-reading amendments were related to the management of LIFE+ budget which was also the most controversial issue.
Svet je v skupnem stališču predlagal sistem prenesenega upravljanja programa, kjer naj bi z 80 % sredstev upravljale države članice.
The Council Common position proposed a system of delegated management of the Programme, under which 80% for the funds were to be managed by Members States.
Evropski parlament je vztrajal pri osrednji vlogi Komisije in se torej zavzemal za sistem centralnega upravljanja.
The EP insisted on the central role of the Commission and therefore supported a system of central management.
Druga sporna vprašanja med Parlamentom in Svetom so se nanašala zlasti na proračun (med drugim financiranje programa Natura 2000), uvedbo novega postopka komitologije in ukrepe, upravičene do sredstev.
Other issues at stake between Parliament and Council concerned mainly budgetary questions (including the financing of Natura 2000), the introduction of the new Comitology procedure, and the measures eligible for funding.
Spravni postopek
The Conciliation procedure
Svet je nato dal neuradno vedeti, da vseh predlogov sprememb Parlamenta ne bo mogel sprejeti in da bo potreben spravni postopek.
The Council subsequently indicated informally that it would be unable to accept all of the Parliament's amendments and that consequently a conciliation procedure would be necessary.
Ustanovitvena seja delegacije Parlamenta v spravnem odboru je potekala 28. novembra 2006 v Bruslju.
The constituent meeting of Parliament's delegation to the Conciliation Committee was held on 28 November 2006 in Brussels.
Sledile so tri razprave (1. februarja, 13. februarja in 1. marca), pogajalska skupina je delegaciji Parlamenta poročala 13. februarja in 15. marca.
Three trialogues were held (on 1 February, 13 February and 1 March), with the negotiating team reporting back to the EP delegation (on 13 February and 15 March).
V prvem krogu pogajanj je Svet sprejel stališče Parlamenta o centralnem neposrednem upravljanju.
During this first phase of negotiations, the Council accepted the EP position on central direct management.
Pri drugih vprašanjih, kot so možnost držav članic za določanje prednostnih nalog, sodelovanje javnosti in tehnične določbe, je prišlo do razumnega napredka.
Reasonable progress was made on other issues such as the possibility for Member States to set national priorities, public participation and some technical provisions.
Vendar pa so druga pomembna vprašanja, kot na primer celoten proračun, izvrševanje proračuna, delež proračuna, namenjen projektom narave in biološke raznovrstnosti, ter potreba po boljših projektih mednarodnega sodelovanja, ostala nerešena.
However, other key points of difference remained unresolved, namely: the total budget, implementation of the budget, the proportion of the budget dedicated to "nature and biodiversity" projects, and the need to enhance transnational cooperation projects.
Spravni odbor se je sestal 27. marca 2007 zvečer.
The Conciliation Committee met in the evening of 27 March 2007.
Evropski parlament so zastopali podpredsednica Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, predsedujoči pristojnega odbora Miroslav Ouzký in poročevalka Marie Anne Isler Béguin.
The EP was represented by Vice-President Mrs. Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, the Chair of the Committee responsible, Mr. Miroslav Ouzký, and the rapporteur, Mrs. Marie Anne Isler Béguin.
Svet je zastopal nemški okoljski minister Gabriel, Komisijo pa komisar Dimas.
The Council was represented by Mr. Gabriel, German Federal Minister of the Environment, and the Commission by Commissioner Dimas.
Odbor je lahko dosegel končni dogovor malo pred polnočjo, po tem ko je delegacija Evropskega parlamenta soglasno sprejela predlagani kompromisni paket.
Shortly before midnight, the Committee was able to reach a final agreement after the delegation of the European Parliament had accepted unanimously the proposed compromise package.
Glavne točke sporazuma je mogoče povzeti v naslednjih točkah:
The key points of the agreement reached may be summarised as follows:
Celoten proračun za LIFE+: Evropskemu parlamentu je uspelo zagotoviti dodatnih 40 milijonov EUR glede na znesek, predlagan v skupnem stališču Sveta.
LIFE+ total budget: The EP succeeded in securing an increase of EUR 40 million above the amount provided for in the Council Common Position.
Proračun za LIFE+ torej znaša 1894 milijonov EUR.
The budget for LIFE+ has now been set at some 1894million Euro.
Izvrševanje proračuna LIFE+: Svet je predlagal, da se 79 % proračunskih sredstev LIFE+ nameni projektom, kar pomeni, da za stroške Komisije ostane 1 %.
Implementation of the LIFE+ budget: The Council had proposed that 79% of the budgetary resources for LIFE+ will be used for project actions, leaving the Commission 1% for other expenses.
Evropski parlament je vztrajal, da je treba Komisiji zagotoviti ustrezna sredstva za upravne izdatke pri postopkih izbire projektov in druge ustrezne dejavnosti, kot so informacijske kampanje, kampanje ozaveščanja in zeleni tedni.
The EP insisted on the need to provide the Commission with the necessary resources to finance the administrative expenditure for the project selection procedure as well as for other relevant activities, such as information and awareness campaigns and Green Weeks.
Dokončni dogovor je, da se 78 % proračunskih sredstev LIFE+ uporabi za projekte, Komisija pa bo za druge stroške imela na voljo 2 % proračuna.
It was finally agreed that 78% of the budgetary resources for LIFE+ will be used for project actions and the Commission will be provided with 2% of the budget for other expenses.
Delež proračuna LIFE+, namenjen projektom za varstvo narave in biološke raznovrstnosti: Evropski parlament je zagotovil, da se bo vsaj polovica proračunskih sredstev LIFE+ namenila projektom za spodbujanje varstva narave in biološke raznovrstnosti.
Proportion of the LIFE+ budget dedicated to "nature and biodiversity" projects: The EP has ensured that at least 50% of the budget resources of LIFE+ will be dedicated to project action grants for measures to support the conservation of nature and biodiversity.
Svet je v skupnem stališču predlagal, da se tem projektom nameni 40 % celotnega proračuna.
In its common position, the Council had proposed dedicating 40% of the whole budget to such projects.
Med zasedanjem spravnega odbora je komisar Dimas prebral izjavo, da bo Komisija pred revizijo finančnega načrta pripravila pregled obvezne in načrtovane porabe za upravljanje omrežja Natura 2000, tako na nacionalni kot evropski ravni.
During the Conciliation Committee meeting, Mr Dimas read out a declaration that, before the review of the Financial Framework, the Commission will undertake a review of committed and planned spending, both at national and EU level, on the management of the Natura 2000 networks.
Ta pregled bo služil pri prilagajanju instrumentov Skupnosti, zlasti LIFE+, in zagotavljanju visoke stopnje sofinanciranja.
This overview will be used with a view to adapting community instruments, in particular LIFE+, and to ensuring a high level of co-financing.
Dogovor, dosežen v spravnem postopku, obravnava bistvena vprašanja, zajeta v predlogih sprememb Parlamenta iz druge obravnave.
The agreement reached in the course of the conciliation procedure addresses the key issues covered by the Parliament's second-reading amendments.
Poleg tega so zaključki dogovora bolj zadovoljivi kot bi lahko bil kakršen koli dogovor, sklenjen v začetni stopnji zakonodajnega postopka.
It is also much more satisfactory than any agreement which could have been concluded at an earlier stage of the legislative procedure.
Evropskemu parlamentu je zlasti uspelo doseči, da Evropska komisija ohrani osrednjo vlogo pri upravljanju programa.
In particular, the EP succeeded in ensuring that the European Commission will remain the key player in the management of the programme.
Delegacija zato Parlamentu predlaga, da v tretji obravnavi skupno besedilo sprejme.
The delegation accordingly recommends that Parliament approve the joint text at third reading.
Skupno besedilo uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o finančnem instrumentu za okolje (LIFE+), ki ga je odobril spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+)
Pristojni odbor Predsednik/-ca
Committee responsible Chairman:
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o finančnem instrumentu za okolje (LIFE+) – KOM(2004)0621 – C6‑0127/2004
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) – COM(2004)0621 – C6‑0127/2004
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 577/98 o organizaciji vzorčne raziskave delovne sile v Skupnosti
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0565 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0565 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 285(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0326/2006 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0326/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6‑0181/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0181/2007 ),
( 4a) Ukrepe, ki so potrebni za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 577/98 o organizaciji vzorčne raziskave delovne sile v Skupnosti 1 je treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil 2 .
(4a) The measures necessary for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community 1 should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission 2 .
1 UL L 77, 14.3.1998, str.
1 OJ L 77, 14.3.1998, p.3.
Sklep, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom 2006/512/ES (UL L 200, 22.7.2006, str.
Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p.
člen 4, odstavek 2, pododstavek 2, uvodni del (Uredba (ES) št. 577/98)
Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, introductory part (Regulation (EC) No 577/98)
V členu 4(2) se uvodni del pododstavka 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Article 4, paragraph 2, the introductory part of subparagraph 2 shall be replaced by the following:
„Vsako leto se v skladu z regulativnim postopkom, iz člena 8(2) sestavi večletni program ad hoc modulov:“
"A programme of ad hoc modules covering several years shall be laid down annually in accordance with the regulatory procedure specified in Article 8(2):"
člen 4, odstavek 3 (Uredba (ES) št. 577/98)
Article 4, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC) No 577/98)
V členu 4 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim :
In Article 4, paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following:
Opredelitve, nadzorni predpisi, kodifikacija spremenljivk, prilagajanje seznama spremenljivk raziskovanja, ki je potrebno zaradi razvoja tehnik in konceptov, ter seznam načel za oblikovanje vprašanj v zvezi z delovnim statusom se določijo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 8(2).“
The definitions, edits to be used, codification of variables, adjustment of the list of survey variables made necessary by the evolution of techniques and concepts, and a list of principles for the formulation of the questions concerning the labour status, shall be laid down in accordance with the regulatory procedure specified in Article 8(2)."
člen 6, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 577/98)
Article 6, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 577/98)
Podatki, ki ustrezajo parametru raziskave „plača za glavno delo“, se Eurostatu lahko pošljejo v roku osemnajstih mesecev od konca obdobja opazovanja, če se za predložitev teh informacij uporabljajo administrativni podatki.“
Data corresponding to the survey characteristic 'wages from the main job' can be forwarded to Eurostat within eighteen months of the end of the reference period when administrative data are used to supply this information.
Podatki, ki ustrezajo parametru raziskave „plača za glavno delo“, se Eurostatu lahko pošljejo v roku enaindvajsetih mesecev od konca obdobja opazovanja, če se za predložitev teh informacij uporabljajo administrativni podatki.“
Data corresponding to the survey characteristic 'wages from the main job' can be forwarded to Eurostat within twenty-one months of the end of the reference period when administrative data are used to supply this information.
Vzorčna raziskava delovne sile v Skupnosti
Labour force sample survey in the Community
o azilu: sodelovanje v praksi in kakovost odločanja na področju skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema
on asylum: practical cooperation, quality of decision-making in the common European asylum system
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.....................................................3
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...............................................................3
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................12
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...13
– ob upoštevanju člena 63(1) in (2) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
– having regard to Article 63(1) and (2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2005/85/ES z dne 1. decembra 2005 o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah
– having regard to Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status
UL L 326, 13.12.2005, str.
OJ L 326, 13.12.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite
– having regard to Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003 z dne 18. februarja 2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2003/9/ES z dne 27. januarja 2003 o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil
– having regard to Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers
– ob upoštevanju Haaškega programa, sprejetega 4. in 5. novembra 2004,
– having regard to the Hague Programme of 4 and 5 November 2004,
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča o spremenjenem predlogu Direktive Sveta o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah z dne 27. septembra 2005
– having regard to its position on the amended proposal for a Council directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status of 27 September 2005
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "o krepitvi sodelovanja v praksi: nove strukture, novi pristopi: izboljšanje kakovosti odločanja na področju skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema" ( KOM(2006)0067 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on strengthened practical cooperation: new structures, new approaches: improving the quality of decision-making in the common European asylum system ( COM(2006)0067 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o prilagoditvi določb iz naslova IV Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti v zvezi s pristojnostmi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti za zagotovitev učinkovitejšega sodnega varstva ( KOM(2006)0346 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on adaptation of the provisions of Title IV of the Treaty establishing the European Community relating to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice with a view to ensuring more effective judicial protection ( COM(2006)0346 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6-0182/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6-0182/2007 ),
A. ker se je s sprejetjem štirih inštrumentov, predvidenih v členu 63(1) PES, zaključil prvi del vpeljave skupnega azilnega sistema; ker bo treba premagati tako politične kot tehnične težave pred začetkom drugega dela vpeljave evropskega azilnega sistema, katerega cilj je uvedba skupnega azilnega postopka in enotnega statuta za osebe, ki imajo pravico do azila ali subsidiarne zaščite, in v upanju, da bo pri tem upoštevan predvideni rok – leto 2010,
A. whereas the first phase of the introduction of the common asylum system was completed with the adoption of the four instruments provided for in Article 63(1) of the EC Treaty; whereas there are both political and technical difficulties which will have to be overcome before the second phase of the system can be launched, the aim of which is to introduce a common asylum procedure and a uniform status for persons entitled to asylum or subsidiary protection; and whereas it is to be hoped that the deadline for completing this phase, 2010, will be met,
B. ker je podprl opredelitev izraza 'begunec' že v Direktivi Sveta 2004/83/ES, zato je ta opredelitev pomembna tudi za to resolucijo,
B. whereas it had already lent its backing to the definition of 'refugee', when it appeared in Council Directive 2004/83/EC and that definition is therefore also valid for this resolution,
C. ker je sprejemanje direktiv pri vzpostavljanju skupnih standardov le prvi korak, in ker mora tej fazi nujno slediti primeren prenos določb, sprejetih na ravni Skupnosti, v vseh državah članicah; ker je nadzor tega prenosa s strani Komisije zelo pomemben in ker morajo biti zato za to nalogo pripravljena primerna sredstva,
C. whereas, when it comes to implementing joint standards, the adoption of directives is only a first step, and whereas this phase must necessarily be followed by the proper implementation in all Member States of the provisions adopted at Community level; whereas scrutiny of that implementation process by the Commission constitutes a highly significant task for which appropriate resources must therefore be made available,
D. ker so do sedaj sprejeti instrumenti na področju azila določili le minimalne standarde in ob upoštevanju, da je treba preseči težnjo po dogovoru o najmanjšem skupnem imenovalcu, da bi se izognili negativni tekmi, ki bi zmanjšala zaščito in kakovost sprejemanja, postopkov ter zaščite,
D. whereas the instruments adopted thus far in the area of asylum policy have only set minimum standards, and bearing in mind that the tendency to agree on a lowest common denominator must be overcome in order to avoid a race to the bottom, lowering the protection and the quality of reception, of procedures, and of protection,
E. ker je Evropski svet v Haaškem programu, sprejetem 4. in 5. novembra 2004, Svet in Komisijo pozval k vzpostavitvi ustreznih struktur, ki bi vključevale nacionalne službe držav članic, pristojne za vprašanja azila, z namenom olajšanja sodelovanja v praksi, in ker je krepitev tega praktičnega sodelovanja, izmenjave informacij in izmenjave zanesljivih postopkov med državami članicami pomembna za uresničitev cilja skupnega azilnega postopka in enotnega statusa,
E. whereas in the Hague Programme of 4 and 5 November 2004, the European Council called on the Council and the Commission to establish suitable structures involving the national asylum services of the Member States, with a view to facilitating practical cooperation, and whereas stepping up this practical cooperation and exchanges of information and details of proven procedures between the Member States represents an important means of achieving the goal of a common asylum procedure and a uniform status’,