natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega bo vrsta dvanajstih temeljnih pravic iz uredbe veljala tudi za potnike, ki potujejo na krajših relacijah.
In addition, a series of twelve basic rights of the Regulation will apply also to passengers travelling over shorter scheduled distances.
Te pravice se nanašajo zlasti na potrebe invalidov in oseb z omejeno mobilnostjo, kot je nediskriminacijski dostop do prevoza, pravica do povračila za izgubo invalidskih vozičkov ali druge opreme za mobilnost oziroma za škodo na njih, oddaja in obravnava pritožb, usposabljanje osebja o vprašanjih o ravnanju z invalidi, informacije, posredovane med potjo itd.
These rights focus in particular on the needs of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility such as non-discriminatory access to transport, the right to compensation for loss of, or damage to, wheelchairs or other mobility equipment, submission and handling of complaints, disability-related training of staff of buses or coaches, information to be provided during the journey etc.
Začasni odlog izvajanja
Time derogations
Z izjemo teh osnovnih pravic lahko države članice domače ponudnike linijskih prevozov oprostijo izvajanja uredbe za obdobje, ki ne presega štiri leta, podaljša pa se lahko enkrat.
With the exception of these basic rights Member States may exempt domestic regular services from the application of the Regulation for a period no longer than four years, renewable once.
Država članica lahko oprosti določene ponudnike za obdobje, ki ne presega štiri leta, podaljša pa se lahko enkrat, če se velik del njihovih storitev opravlja zunaj Unije.
Member States may also exempt particular services because a significant part of such services is operated outside the Union for a period no longer than four years, renewable once.
Odškodnina in pomoč v primeru nesreč
Compensation and assistance in the event of accidents
Potniki imajo pravico do odškodnine v primeru smrti, vključno s poravnavo pogrebnih stroškov v razumnih mejah, ali za telesno poškodbo, kot tudi za izgubo prtljage ali škodo na njej, ki je nastala zaradi nesreče.
Passengers are entitled to compensation for death, including reasonable funeral expenses, or personal injury as well as to loss of or damage to luggage due to accidents.
Zgornje meje za te odškodnine v nacionalnem pravu ne smejo biti nižje od najnižjih vsot, določenih v uredbi, kar pomeni 200.000 EUR za potnika in 1200 EUR za kos prtljage.
The ceilings for such compensation under national law must not be lower than the minimum amounts laid down in the Regulation, that is, EUR 220.000 per passenger and EUR 1200 per item of luggage.
Škodo na medicinsko-tehničnih pripomočkih, kot so invalidski vozički, je treba nadomestiti v celoti.
Damage to assistive devices such as wheelchairs has to be compensated entirely.
V primeru nesreče imajo potniki po potrebi pravico do pomoči za kritje svojih takojšnjih potreb, na primer hrane in oblačil, prevoza, prve pomoči in namestitve v vrednosti do 80 EUR na noč za potnika za največ dve noči.
Moreover, in the event of an accident passengers are entitled to assistance to cover their immediate practical needs, including, where necessary, provision of food and clothes, transport, facilitation of first assistance, and accommodation of up to EUR 80 per night and per passenger for a maximum of two nights.
Pravice potnikov v primeru odpovedi ali zamude potovanja
Rights of passengers in the event of cancellations or delays
Če je avtobusni prevoz odpovedan, zamuja več kot 120 minut, ali ima preveliko število rezervacij, se potnikom nemudoma ponudi možnost, da izberejo med nadaljevanjem poti in preusmeritvijo potovanja do svojega cilja brez dodatnih stroškov ali povračil cene vozovnice; če prevoznik ne ponudi te možnosti, imajo potniki poleg povračila cene vozovnice pravico tudi do odškodnine v višini do 50 % vrednosti vozovnice, .
Where a bus or coach service is cancelled or delayed for more than 120 minutes or overbooked, passengers shall immediately be offered the choice between continuation of the journey or re-routing to their final destination at no additional cost or reimbursement of the ticket price; if the carrier fails to offer this choice, passengers shall have the right to compensation amounting to 50% of the ticket price, in addition to the reimbursement of the ticket price.
Če se avtobus pokvari med vožnjo, prevoznik poskrbi za nadaljevanje poti z drugim vozilom ali potnike prepelje do ustreznega čakališča ali terminala, od koder bodo lahko nadaljevali svojo pot.
Where the bus or coach becomes inoperable during the journey, the carrier shall provide either the continuation of the service with another vehicle or transport to a suitable waiting point or terminal from where the continuation of the journey becomes possible.
Potnikom se v primeru odpovedi ali zamude nudijo ustrezne informacije; te informacije se, kjer je to možno, posredujejo v elektronski obliki vsem potnikom, tudi tistim, ki ne začenjajo poti s terminala, če so to zahtevali in prevozniku posredovali ustrezne kontaktne podatke.
In the event of cancellation or delay passengers shall be provided with all necessary information; where feasible, this information shall be provided by electronic means to all passengers, including those not departing from terminals, if the passenger has requested this and has provided the necessary contact details to the carrier.
Pravice invalidov in oseb z omejeno mobilnostjo
Rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility
Ponudnikih avtobusnih prevozov so dolžni nuditi pomoč invalidom in osebam z omejeno mobilnostjo, če potnik obvesti podjetje o svojih potrebah vsaj 36 ur pred odhodom.
Bus and coach companies are required to provide assistance to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility, provided that the passenger informs the company of his/her needs at the latest 36 hours before departure.
Če ponudnik ne more poskrbeti za ustrezno pomoč, lahko potnika z omejeno mobilnostjo brezplačno spremlja oseba, ki jo sam izbere.
If the operator is unable to provide suitable assistance, the passenger with reduced mobility may be accompanied at no extra cost by a companion of his/her choice.
Ponudnik, upravno telo ali pristojna postaja mora povrniti stroške ob izgubi invalidskih vozičkov ali škodi na njih oziroma na drugi pomožni opremi.
Any loss of or damage to wheelchairs or other assistance equipment must be compensated by the company or the management body of the station responsible.
Končno besedilo je zelo zadovoljujoče in uravnoteženo, saj potnikom jamči njihove pravice, hkrati pa prevoznikom, ki so večinoma mala ali srednja podjetja, ne vsiljuje velikega bremena.
The final text can be regarded as a very satisfactory and well balanced compromise as it manages to secure the rights of passengers without at the same time imposing a heavy burden on carriers, most of which are small and medium sized enterprises.
Za Evropski parlament je zlasti uspešen izid spravnega postopka, saj:
In particular the outcome of the conciliation procedure can be regarded as successful for the European Parliament considering that:
a) je Svet na začetku predvideval področje uporabe do 500 km, sporazumno pa je bila določena meja 250 km,
a) on the scope the initial Council negotiating position foresaw 500 km and the compromise reached is 250 km;
b) je Svet na začetku med temeljne pravice potnikov ne glede na razdaljo vključil samo tri pravice, končni sporazum pa jih predvideva dvanajst, s posebnim poudarkom na potrebah invalidov in oseb z omejeno mobilnostjo,
b) as regards the basic rights of passengers independent of distance, the initial Council position included only three such rights and the final compromise twelve, with special focus on the needs of disabled persons and persons of reduced mobility;
c) je Svet pri odlogu izvajanja predvidel obdobje 15 let za domače storitve in nedoločen čas za mednarodne storitve, sporazum pa predvideva največ osem let v obeh primerih (obdobje štirih let, ki se lahko enkrat podaljša),
c) with regard to exemptions, the Council sought periods of up to 15 years for domestic services and of an indefinite time for international services, whereas the final compromise foresees a maximum of eight years in both cases (a period of four years, renewable once);
d) ima vsak potnik pravico, da v primeru nesreče, odpovedanega ali odloženega odhoda za več kot devetdeset minut, po potrebi koristi nastanitev v hotelu za skupno vrednost do 80 EUR na noč za največ dve noči, Svet pa je sprva predvidel vsoto 50 EUR,
d) in the event of an accident or a cancelled or a delayed departure for more than ninety minutes every passenger shall have the right, if necessary, to hotel accommodation for a total cost of EUR 80 per night and for a maximum of two nights whereas the initial Council position foresaw EUR 50;
e) imajo v primeru nesreče potniki pravico do takojšnje pomoči, tudi nastanitve (glej zgoraj), hrane, oblek, prevoza in nudenja prve pomoči,
e) in the event of an accident passengers shall have the right to immediate assistance, including accommodation (see above), food, clothes, transport and the facilitation of first assistance;
f) imajo potniki v primeru odpovedi, zamude več kot 120 minut ali prevelikega števila rezervacij pravico do odškodnine v vrednosti do 50 % cene vozovnice, poleg pravice, da pot nadaljujejo ali da do cilja potujejo po drugi poti, ali da izberejo povrnitev cene vozovnice,
f) in the event of a cancellation, a delay for more than 120 minutes or overbooking, passengers shall have the right to compensation amounting to 50% of the ticket price, in addition to the right of continuation or re-routing to the final destination or reimbursement of the ticket price;
g) sporazum predvideva takojšnje posredovanje posodobljenih informacij potnikom po elektronskih medijih.
g) the agreement foresees the provision of updated information to passengers in real time by electronic means.
Delegacija Parlamenta v Spravnem odboru zato priporoča, naj se skupno besedilo odobri v tretji obravnavi.
The Parliament Delegation to the Conciliation Committee therefore recommends that the joint text be approved at third reading.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravicah potnikov v avtobusnem prevozu in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004
Proposal for a Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council concerning the rights of passengers in bus and coach transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004
Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou)
Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou
Osnutek akta, obravnavan v prvi obravnavi
Draft act considered at first reading
Datum 1. obravnave EP – številka P
Date of first reading – P number
Stališče Sveta iz prve obravnave
Council position at first reading
Stališče Komisije (člen 294(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije)
Commission position (Article 294(6), Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)
Mnenje Komisije (člen 294(7)(c) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije)
Commission opinion (Article 294(7)(c), Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)
Navzoči namestniki (člen 187(2) poslovnika)
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the vote
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva
on the proposal for a Council decision authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva ( KOM(2010)0790 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection ( COM(2010)0790 ),
– ob upoštevanju prošnje za odobritev, ki jo je Svet podal v skladu s členom 329(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (C7–xxxxxx),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 329(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7‑xxxxxx),
– ob upoštevanju členov 74g in 81(1) Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 74g and 81(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7–0021/2011 )
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0021/2011 ),
A. ker je Komisija leta 2000 sprejela predlog uredbe Sveta o patentu Skupnosti ( KOM(2000)0412 ); ker je imel predlog šest poglavij: (i) Poglavje I o splošnih določbah, Poglavje II o patentnem pravu, (iii) Poglavje III o podaljšanju, prenehanju veljavnosti in neveljavnosti patenta Skupnosti, (iv) Poglavje IV o pristojnosti in tožbenem postopku v zvezi s patentom Skupnosti, (v) Poglavje V o učinku na nacionalno pravo in (VI) Končne določbe,
A. whereas in 2000 the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent ( COM(2000)0412 ); whereas that proposal contained six chapters: (i) Chapter I on general provisions, (ii) Chapter II on patent law, (iii) Chapter III on renewal, lapse and invalidity of the Community patent, (iv) Chapter IV on jurisdiction and procedure in legal actions relating to the Community patent, (v) Chapter V on impact on national law and (vi) final provisions,
B. ker je predlog temeljil na členu 308 Pogodbe ES, ki je določal posvetovanje s Parlamentom in soglasno sprejetje v Svetu,
B. whereas that proposal was based on Article 308 of the EC Treaty, which required consultation with Parliament and a unanimous vote in the Council,
C. ker je v skladu s postopkom posvetovanja Parlament 10. aprila 2002
C. whereas on 10 April 2002
D. ker je hitro postalo jasno, da imajo nekatere države članice določene težave, zaradi katerih niso mogle sprejeti predlagane uredbe; ker zlasti nekatere države članice niso mogle sprejeti ureditve prevajanja za patent Skupnosti, zaradi česar je Svet sklepal, da zaradi vprašanja prevajanja ne more doseči političnega sporazuma o predlogu Komisije, saj zanj ni soglasja,
D. whereas it had quickly become clear that some Member States had specific problems which made it impossible for them to accept the proposed regulation; whereas, in particular, some Member States were unable to accept the translation arrangements for the Community patent, which led the Council to conclude that, on account of the translation regime issue, the Council was unable to reach a political agreement on the Commission proposal, due to the lack of a unanimous consensus,
E. ker je Komisija 9. januarja 2006 začela posvetovanja o prihodnji patentni politiki v Evropi, na kar se je Parlament odzval s sprejetjem resolucije 12. oktobra 2006
E. whereas on 9 January 2006 the Commission launched a consultation on future patent policy in Europe to which Parliament responded by adopting a resolution on 12 October 2006
F. ker so se posvetovanja v Svetu znova začela aprila 2007, po sprejetju sporočila Komisije o izboljšanju patentnega sistema v Evropi
F. whereas discussions in the Council were re-launched after the adoption in April 2007 of the Commission Communication on enhancing the patent system in Europe
G. ker je 4. decembra 2009 Svet sprejel sklepe o glavnih značilnostih prihodnjega patentnega sistema, ki bo temeljil na dveh stebrih: (i) oblikovanju enotnega sistema reševanja patentnih sporov in (ii) oblikovanju patenta EU – pravnega instrumenta, ki bo jamčil veljavnost patentov po celotni EU; ker Svet meni, da morajo biti ti sklepi del skupnega končnega sporazuma o svežnju ukrepov za izboljšanje patentnega sistema v Evropi, ki zajemajo ustanovitev sodišča za evropske patente in patente EU, uvedbo patenta EU, vključno s posebno ureditvijo prevajanja, okrepljeno partnerstvo med Evropskim patentnim uradom in osrednjimi uradi držav članic za industrijsko lastnino in, v potrebnem obsegu, spremembe Evropske patentne konvencije,
G. whereas on 4 December 2009 the Council adopted conclusions on the main features of the future patent system based on two pillars: (i) the creation of a unified patent litigation system, and (ii) the creation of an EU patent – a legal instrument for granting patents valid across the EU as a whole; whereas the Council considered that those conclusions should form part of the overall final agreement on a package of measures for an Enhanced Patent System in Europe comprising the creation of a European and EU Patents Court (EEUPC), an EU patent, including the separate regulation on the translation arrangements, an Enhanced Partnership between the European Patent Office and central industrial property offices of Member States and, to the extent necessary, amendments to the European Patent Convention,
H. ker se je z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2009 z uvedbo člena 118 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) spremenila pravna podlaga za uvedbo patenta EU, in sicer je v tem členu navedeno: „Pri vzpostavitvi ali delovanju notranjega trga Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku določita ukrepe za uvedbo evropskih pravic intelektualne lastnine, da se zagotovi enotno varstvo pravic intelektualne lastnine v vsej Uniji in vzpostavi centralizirana ureditev na ravni Unije na področju potrjevanja, usklajevanja in nadzorovanja.“;
H. whereas the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009 brought about a change of the legal basis for the creation of the EU patent by introducing Article 118 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU"), according to which: “In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish measures for the creation of European intellectual property rights to provide uniform protection of intellectual property rights throughout the Union and for the setting up of centralised Union-wide authorisation, coordination and supervision arrangements.”
I. ker je v skladu s prvim odstavkom člena 118 PDEU patent EU kot evropska pravica intelektualne lastnine lahko uveden po rednem zakonodajnem postopku; ker mora v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 118 PDEU Svet po posebnem zakonodajnem postopku in soglasno odločiti o jezikovni ureditvi za te pravice,
I. whereas in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 118 TFEU the EU patent as a European intellectual property right can be established under the ordinary legislative procedure; whereas, however, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 118 TFEU a special legislative procedure requiring unanimity within the Council must be followed for the establishment of the language arrangements for such rights,
J. ker je po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe Komisija potrdila svoj predlog iz leta 2000
J. whereas following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon the Commission confirmed its 2000 proposal
KOM(2009)0665 . ; ker je Parlament na prvi obravnavi 5. maja 2010
COM(2009)0665 . ; whereas in order to accelerate the procedure and allow the Council to formally transpose its political conclusions of 4 December 2009 into a Council position, which would be the next step in the ordinary legislative procedure, Parliament on 5 May 2010
K. ker je Komisija 30. junija 2010 sprejela predlog Uredbe Sveta o ureditvi prevajanja za patent Evropske unije
K. whereas on 30 June 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent
KOM(2010)0350 . , ki nadgrajuje obstoječi jezikovni sistem Evropskega patentnega urada,
COM(2010)0350 . , which built on the existing language regime of the European Patent Office,
L. ker je bilo kljub nekaj krogom pogajanj, ki jih je leta 2010 pripravil Svet, na seji Sveta za konkurenčnost dne 10. decembra 2010 potrjeno, da so težave nepremostljive, zaradi česar soglasje o ureditvi prevajanja za patent Evropske unije ni možno niti sedaj niti v bližnji prihodnosti, in da z uporabo ustreznih določb pogodb ni bilo mogoče v razumnem času doseči ciljev predlaganih uredb za vzpostavitev enotnega patentnega varstva po vsej Evropski uniji,
L. whereas despite several rounds of negotiations undertaken by the Council in 2010, it was confirmed at the Competitiveness Council meeting on 10 December 2010 that insurmountable difficulties existed making a decision on the translation arrangements requiring unanimity impossible now and in the foreseeable future and that the objectives of the proposed Regulations to establish unitary patent protection in the entire European Union could not be attained within a reasonable period by applying the relevant provisions of the Treaties,
M. ker je več držav članic nakazalo, da so pripravljene obravnavati možnost vzpostavitve enotnega patenta v sklopu okrepljenega sodelovanja,
M. whereas several Member States indicated their readiness to consider the possibility of establishing a unitary patent within the framework of enhanced cooperation,
N. ker je z naslovitvijo prošnje na Komisijo v skladu s členom 329(1) PDEU več kot devet držav članic sporočilo, da nameravajo vzpostaviti medsebojno okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva, nato pa je Komisija predložila predlog sklepa Sveta o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva,
N. whereas more than nine Member States have indicated their intention to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection by addressing a request to the Commission in accordance with Article 329(1) TFEU, and subsequently the Commission has presented a proposal for a Council decision authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection,
O. ker je Parlament preveril skladnost člena 20 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členov 326 do 334 PDEU,
O. whereas Parliament has verified compliance with Article 20 of the Treaty on European Union ("TEU") and Articles 326 to 334 TFEU,
P. ker je v skladu s členom 20 PEU za vzpostavitev medsebojnega okrepljenega sodelovanja, ki ni na področju izključne pristojnosti Unije, potrebnih najmanj devet držav članic, pri čemer lahko v mejah in v skladu s postopki ter pod pogoji, določenimi v tem členu in v členih 326 do 334 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, uporabijo njene institucije in izvajajo te pristojnosti ob pravno dosledni uporabi določb Pogodb;
P. whereas, according to Article 20 TEU, a minimum of nine Member States may establish enhanced cooperation between themselves within the framework of the Union's non-exclusive competences, while using its institutions and exercising those competences by applying the provisions of the Treaties in a legally consistent manner, subject to the limits and in accordance with the arrangements laid down in that Article and in Articles 326 to 334 TFEU,
Q. ker uvedba enotnega patentnega varstva ni na seznamu področij v izključni pristojnosti Unije, določenih v členu 3(1) PDEU; ker je pravna podlaga za uvedbo evropskih pravic intelektualne lastnine člen 118 PDEU, ki posebej navaja vzpostavitev in delovanje notranjega trga, ki je v skladu s členom 4 PDEU v deljeni pristojnosti Unije; ker torej spada uvedba enotnega patentnega varstva, vključno z ustrezno ureditvijo prevajanja, v področje, ki ni v izključni pristojnosti Unije,
Q. whereas the creation of unitary patent protection is not included in the list of areas of exclusive competence of the Union set out in Article 3(1) TFEU; whereas the legal basis for the creation of European intellectual property rights is Article 118 TFEU, which makes a specific reference to the establishment and functioning of the internal market, one of the shared competences of the Union according to Article 4 TFEU; whereas the creation of unitary patent protection, including applicable translation arrangements, therefore falls within the framework of the Union's non-exclusive competence,