natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Določbe iz uvodne izjave 19 – „V skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1560/2003 z dne 2. septembra 2003 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta št. 343/2003 se lahko predaja v odgovorno državo članico izvede prostovoljno v obliki nadzorovanega odhoda ali v spremstvu.
The provisions included in r ecital 19 [ "In accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 of 2 September 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003, transfers to the Member State responsible may be carried out on a voluntary basis, by supervised departure or under escort.
Države članice bi morale spodbujati prostovoljne predaje in zagotoviti, da se nadzorovane predaje ali predaje v spremstvu izvajajo na human način ob popolnem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in človeškega dostojanstva.“ – bi morale biti prisotne tudi v zavezujočem delu besedila.
Member States should promote voluntary transfers and should ensure that supervised or escorted transfers are undertaken in a human manner, in full respect for fundamental rights and human dignity" ] should be echoed in the binding part of the text.
Če Komisija meni, da lahko splošne razmere v neki državi članici privedejo do ravni zaščite prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, ki ni v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti z Direktivo […/…/ES] o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil in Direktivo 2005/85/ES, se lahko v skladu s postopkom iz odstavka 4 odloči, da se v skladu s to uredbo vse predaje prosilcev v zadevno državo članico odložijo.
When the Commission considers that the circumstances prevailing in a Member State may lead to a level of protection for applicants for international protection which is not in conformity with Community legislation, in particular with Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers and with Directive 2005/85/EC, it may decide in conformity with the procedure laid down in paragraph 4, that all transfers of applicants in accordance with this Regulation to the Member State concerned be suspended.
Če Komisija meni, da lahko splošne razmere v neki državi članici privedejo do ravni zaščite prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, ki ni v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti z Direktivo […/…/ES] o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil, Direktivo 2005/85/ES in Direktivo 2004/83/ES , se lahko v skladu s postopkom iz odstavka 4 odloči, da se v skladu s to uredbo vse predaje prosilcev v zadevno državo članico odložijo.
When the Commission considers that the circumstances prevailing in a Member State may lead to a level of protection for applicants for international protection which is not in conformity with Community legislation, in particular with Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers , Directive 2005/85/EC and Directive 2004/83/EC , it may decide in conformity with the procedure laid down in paragraph 4, that all transfers of applicants in accordance with this Regulation to the Member State concerned be suspended.
Direktiva Sveta 2004/83/ES (o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite) je glavni instrument zakonodaje EU na področju azila, zato bi bilo treba vključiti izrecno sklicevanje nanjo.
The Qualification Directive 2004/83/EC (on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted) is the core instrument of the EU asylum acquis and, therefore, an explicit reference should be included.
Če državo članico skrbi, da splošne razmere v drugi državi članici lahko privedejo do ravni zaščite prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, ki ni v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti z Direktivo […/…/ES] o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil in Direktivo 2005/85/ES, lahko zahteva odložitev vseh predaj prosilcev v skladu s to uredbo v zadevno državo članico.
When a Member State is concerned that the circumstances prevailing in another Member State may lead to a level of protection for applicants for international protection which is not in conformity with Community legislation, in particular with Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers and with Directive 2005/85/EC, it may request that all transfers of applicants in accordance with this Regulation to the Member State concerned be suspended.
Če državo članico skrbi, da splošne razmere v drugi državi članici lahko privedejo do ravni zaščite prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, ki ni v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti z Direktivo […/…/ES] o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil, Direktivo 2005/85/ES in Direktivo 2004/83/ES , lahko zahteva odložitev vseh predaj prosilcev v skladu s to uredbo v zadevno državo članico.
When a Member State is concerned that the circumstances prevailing in another Member State may lead to a level of protection for applicants for international protection which is not in conformity with Community legislation, in particular with Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers , Directive 2005/85/EC and Directive 2004/83/EC , it may request that all transfers of applicants in accordance with this Regulation to the Member State concerned be suspended.
Zahtevo naslovi na Komisijo.
The request shall be addressed to the Commission.
V zahtevi navede razloge, na katerih temelji, in vanjo vključi zlasti podrobne informacije o razmerah v zadevni državi članici, ki kažejo na morebitno pomanjkanje skladnosti z zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti z Direktivo […/…/ES] o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil in Direktivo 2005/85/ES.
It shall indicate the grounds on which it is based and shall in particular include detailed information on the situation in the concerned Member State pointing to a possible lack of conformity with Community legislation, in particular Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers and Directive 2005/85/EC.
V zahtevi navede razloge, na katerih temelji, in vanjo vključi zlasti podrobne informacije o razmerah v zadevni državi članici, ki kažejo na morebitno pomanjkanje skladnosti z zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti z Direktivo […/…/ES] o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil, Direktivo 2005/85/ES in Direktivo 2004/83/ES .
It shall indicate the grounds on which it is based and shall in particular include detailed information on the situation in the concerned Member State pointing to a possible lack of conformity with Community legislation, in particular Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers , Directive 2005/85/EC and Directive 2004/83/EC .
Glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe 20.
See justification Amendment 2 0 .
Člen 31 – odstavek 4 – točka d a (novo)
Article 31 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new)
(da) navedbo meril, referenčnih vrednosti in časovnih razporedov, ki jih je treba določiti za oceno napredka glede odpravljanja razmer iz točke (a) tega odstavka.
(da) indicia of measures, benchmarks and timetables to be established in order to assess progress toward resolution of the circumstances identified pursuant to point (a) of this paragraph.
Člen 31 – odstavek 7 a (novo)
Article 31 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Država članica iz odstavkov 1 in 3 učinkovito in hitro ukrepa, da odpravi razmere, ki so privedle do začasne odložitve predaj.
A Member State as referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 shall take effective and timely steps to remedy the situation that led to the temporary suspension of transfers.
Člen 31 – odstavek 8
Article 31 – paragraph 8
Predaje se lahko odložijo za največ šestmesečno obdobje.
Transfers may be suspended for a period which cannot exceed six months.
Če po šestih mesecih še vedno obstajajo razlogi za ukrepe, se lahko Komisija na zahtevo zadevne države članice iz odstavka 1 ali na lastno pobudo odloči za podaljšanje uporabe ukrepov za nadaljnjih šest mesecev.
Where the grounds for the measures still persist after six months, the Commission may decide, upon a request from the Member State concerned referred to paragraph 1 or upon its own initiative, to extend their application for a further six months period.
Za to se uporabi odstavek 5 .
Paragraph 5 applies .
Če po šestih mesecih še vedno obstajajo razlogi za ukrepe, se lahko Komisija na zahtevo zadevne države članice iz odstavka 1 ali na lastno pobudo odloči za podaljšanje uporabe ukrepov za nadaljnjih šest mesecev.
Where the grounds for the measures still persist after six months, the Commission may decide, upon a request from the Member State concerned referred to in paragraph 1 or upon its own initiative, to extend their application for a further six months period.
Uporabljajo se tudi določbe odstavka 5 .
The provisions of paragraph 5 shall also be applicable .
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
Linguistic amendment.
Člen 31 – odstavek 9 a (novo)
Article 31 – paragraph 9 a (new)
Na predlog Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ter v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe se določijo instrumenti, zavezujoči za vse države članice, za učinkovito podporo tistim drža v am članicam, katerih nacionalni sistemi so izpostavljeni specifičnim in nesorazmernim pritiskom, predvsem zaradi geografskih ali demografskih razmer.
On a proposal by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, and acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty , instruments shall be enacted , binding on all Member States, in order to provide effective support to those Member States which are faced with specific and disproportionate pressures on their national systems due, in particular, to their geographical or demographic situation.
Ti instrumenti začnejo veljati najkasneje 31. decembra 2011, v vsakem primeru pa določajo:
Those instrument s shall enter into force no later than 31 December 2011 and in any event make provision for the following :
(a) napotitev uradnikov iz drugih držav članic pod pokroviteljstvom Evropskega urada za podporo azilu [.../.../ES], ki pomagajo tistim državam članicam, ki so izpostavljene specifičnim pritiskom in v katerih prosilci nimajo na voljo zadostnih standardov zaščite;
( a ) t he secondment of officials from other Member States, under the aegis of the European Asylum Support Office [.../.../EC], who assist those Member States which are faced with specific pressures and where the applicants cannot benefit from adequate standards of protection;
(b) sistem za prerazporeditev upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite iz držav članic, ki so izpostavljene specifičnim in nesorazmernim pritiskom, v druge države članice, po posvetovanju z uradom visokega komisarja Združenih narodov za begunce in ob hkratnem zagotavljanju, da se med prerazporeditvijo spoštuje vnaprej določena, pregledna in nedvoumna pravila.
( b ) a scheme to reallocate beneficiaries of international protection from Member States which are faced with specific and disproportionate pressures to others, in consultation with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, while ensuring that the reallocation follows non-discretionary, transparent and unequivocal rules.
Člen 31 – odstavek 9 b (novo)
Article 31 – paragraph 9 b (new)
Ta člen preneha veljati takoj, ko začnejo veljati instrumenti iz odstavka 9a, v vsakem primeru pa najkasneje 31. decembra 2011.
This Article shall cease to apply as soon as the instrum ents referred to in paragraph 9a have entered into force, and in any event on 31 December 2011 at the latest.
Glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe 23.
See justification Amendment 23.
Člen 31 – odstavek 9 c (novo)
Article 31 – paragraph 9 c (new)
Kot del spremljanja in ocenjevanja, omenjenega v členu 41, Komisija pregleda izvajanje tega člena in poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu najkasneje do 30. junija 2011.
As part of the monitoring and evaluation referred to in Article 41, the Commission shall review the application of this Article and report to the European Parliament and the Council no later than 30 June 2011.
V poročilu Komisija presodi, ali obstaja utemeljena potreba, da bi izvajanje tega člena podaljšali po 31. decembru 2011.
In its report, the Commission shall assess whether there is a justified need to extend the application of this Article beyond 31 December 2011.
Če Komisija meni, da je to primerno, predlog za takšno podaljšanje predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe.
If the Commission considers it appropriate, it shall submit a proposal for such an extension to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty.
Člen 32 – odstavek 9 – pododstavek 2
Article 32 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
Če ugotovi, da so bili podatki obdelani tako, da je bila kršena ta uredba ali Direktiva 95/46/ES , zlasti če so podatki nepopolni ali netočni, ima pravico, da se na njegovo zahtevo popravijo ali izbrišejo .
If he finds that this information has been processed in breach of this Regulation or of Directive 95/46/EC, in particular because it is incomplete or inaccurate, he is entitled to have it corrected or erased .
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice).
Amendment in view of a harmonised wording throughout the text.
Člen 35 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Postopek poravnave se začne s prošnjo ene od držav članic v sporu predsedniku odbora iz člena 40 .
The conciliation procedure shall be initiated by a request from one of the Member States in dispute to the Chairman of the Committee set up by Article 40.
Prizadete države članice se s privolitvijo uporabe postopka poravnave obvežejo, da bodo v največji možni meri upoštevale predlagano rešitev.
By agreeing to use the conciliation procedure, the Member States concerned undertake to take the utmost account of the solution proposed.
Člen 41 – pododstavek 1
Article 41 – subparagraph 1
Najpozneje tri leta po datumu iz prvega odstavka člena 44 Komisija poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te uredbe in, kjer je ustrezno, predlaga potrebne spremembe.
At the latest three years after the date mentioned in the first paragraph of Article 44, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation and, where appropriate, shall propose the necessary amendments.
Države članice Komisiji posredujejo vse informacije, potrebne za pripravo navedenega poročila, najpozneje šest mesecev pred iztekom navedenega roka.
Member States shall forward to the Commission all information appropriate for the preparation of that report, at the latest six months before that time limit expires.
Najpozneje tri leta po datumu iz prvega odstavka člena 44 in brez poseganja v člen 31(9c) Komisija poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te uredbe in, kjer je ustrezno, predlaga potrebne spremembe.
At the latest three years after the date mentioned in the first paragraph of Article 44, and without prejudice to Article 31 (9c), the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation and, where appropriate, shall propose the necessary amendments.
V skladu s predlogi o členu 31.
In line with the proposals on Article 31.
Komisija je v poročilu
The Commission's report
13. o oceni dublinskega sistema (t.i. tehnična ocena) zaključila, da so bili splošno gledano cilji sistema, se pravi zagotoviti jasen in delujoč mehanizem za določitev odgovornosti za obravnavanje prošenj za azil, v veliki meri doseženi, nekatera vprašanja glede praktičnega izvajanja in uspešnosti sistema pa vseeno ostajajo.
13. on the evaluation of the Dublin system (the so-called technical evaluation) concluded that 'overall, the objectives of the system, notably to establish a clear and workable mechanism for determining responsibility for asylum applications, have, to a large extent, been achieved' .
Poleg tega je v odzivih na zeleno knjigo
Some concerns nevertheless remained, both on the practical application and the effectiveness of the system.
Komisija se je za odpravo omenjenih slabosti odločila predložiti prenovitev Uredbe Sveta (ES) št 343/2003 z dne 18. februarja 2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dublinska uredba).
Therefore, and with the aim to address the above-mentioned deficiencies, the Commission decided to put forward the proposal for a recast of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003/EC of 18 February 2003 on the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national (hereafter: the Dublin Regulation).
Predlog ohranja temeljna načela dublinske uredbe, namreč da bi morala biti država članica, ki je imela največjo vlogo pri vstopu prosilca na njeno ozemlje ter njegovem bivanju v njej, odgovorna tudi za obravnavanje njegove prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, z nekaj izjemami zaradi varstva enotnosti družine in specifičnih humanitarnih določb.
The proposal retains the same underlying principles as in the existing Dublin Regulation, namely that responsibility for examining an application for international protection lies primarily with the Member State which played the greatest part in the applicant's entry into or residence on the territories of the Member States, subject to exceptions designed to protect family unity and specific humanitarian clauses.
Treba je omeniti, da je Evropski parlament večkrat izrazil svoje mnenje in v svoji resoluciji o oceni dublinskega sistema s septembra 2008 pripravil vrsto priporočil
It should be mentioned that the European Parliament has expressed its opinion on several occasions and put forward a series of recommendations in its September 2008 resolution on the evaluation of the Dublin system
Komisija je večino teh priporočil upoštevala.
Most of these recommendations have been taken into account by the Commission.
Ker je zdajšnja dublinska uredba, kot del prve faze skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, nastala kot rezultat občutljivega političnega kompromisa, ki ga je Svet sprejel s soglasjem, je bilo končno besedilo polno dvoumnosti in zakonskih vrzeli.
The fact that the current Dublin Regulation, as part of the first stage of the CEAS, was the result of a sensitive political compromise, adopted by unanimous vote in the Council, meant that the final text contained many ambiguities and legislative gaps.
Poročevalka se tako strinja z izjavo Komisije, da je obstoječi instrument mogoče še precej izboljšati.
Your rapporteur therefore agrees with the Commission's statement that 'there is still much scope for improving the existing instrument'.
Cilji in vsebina predloga
Objectives and content of the proposal
Komisija želi dopolniti zdajšnji dublinski sistem z:
The Commission wishes to amend the current Dublin system by:
Razširitev področja uporabe uredbe na prosilce za subsidiarno zaščito (ali upravičence do subsidiarne zaščite)
Extending the scope of the application of the Regulation in order to include applicants for (and beneficiaries of) subsidiary protection
Zdajšnji dublinski sistem ne velja za prosilce za subsidiarno zaščito (ali upravičence do subsidiarne zaščite), saj koncept subsidiarne zaščite ob sprejetju sistema še ni bil del zakonodaje o azilu.
The current Dublin system does not apply to applicants for (and beneficiaries of) subsidiary protection, as at the time of its adoption, the concept of subsidiary protection was not yet part of the asylum acquis.
Koncept je bil uveden ob sprejetju direktive 2004/83/ES.
However, this concept was incorporated with the adoption of the Qualification Directive 2004/83/EC.
Čeprav trenutno stanje ne bi takoj pripeljalo do velikih težav v praksi, kot je izpostavljeno v oceni učinkov
Although the current status quo would not immediately lead to enormous difficulties in practice, as highlighted in the impact assessment
SEC(2008)2962 . , bi lahko pripeljalo do situacij, ko se prosilec za azil ne bi mogel ponovno združiti z družinskim članom, ki bi bil upravičen do subsidiarne zaščite v drugi državi članici.
SEC(2008)2962 . , we could end up with a situation in which an asylum-seeker cannot be reunited with a family member who is beneficiary of subsidiary protection in another Member State.
Razširitev področja uporabe je torej potrebna zato, da bi zagotovili skladnost z veljavnim pravnim redom EU in preprečili ločevanje družinskih članov v praksi.
The extension of the scope is thus a necessary modification in order to ensure consistency with current EU acquis and in order to prevent that, in practice, family members are separated.
Bolj na splošno predlog usklajuje izrazje in opredelitve, uporabljene v uredbi, s tistimi v drugih instrumentih s področja azila.
More generally this proposal aims to align the terminology and definitions used in the Regulation with those contained in the other asylum instruments.
Zavoljo večje doslednosti in boljše priprave zakonodaje poročevalka v celoti podpira spremembe, ki jih predlaga Komisija.
With a view to more consistency and better law making your rapporteur fully supports the modifications as proposed by the Commission.
Izboljšanje učinkovitosti zdajšnjega sistema
Enhancing the efficiency of the current system
· Uvedeni so roki, ki bodo poskrbeli za večjo učinkovitost in hitrost postopkov določanja odgovornosti (npr. roki za predložitev zahtev za ponovni sprejem, krajši roki za odgovor na zahteve po informacijah, roki za odgovor na zahteve na podlagi humanitarnih razlogov ter pojasnilo, da se lahko zahteve na podlagi humanitarnih razlogov vložijo kadar koli).
· Introduction of deadlines to ensure that the responsibility determination procedure will become more efficient and rapid (e.g. deadlines for submitting take back requests, shorter deadlines for replying to requests for information, deadlines for replying to requests on humanitarian grounds as well as clarifying that requests on humanitarian grounds can be made at any time);
· Pojasnjeno je prenehanje odgovornosti (npr. v katerih okoliščinah se lahko uporabijo klavzule o prenehanju, katera država članica mora predložiti dokaze).
· Clarification of the cessation of responsibility (e.g. under which circumstances should the cessation clauses apply, which Member State bears the burden of proof);
· Pojasnjene so okoliščine in postopki za uporabo diskrecijske klavzule (iz humanitarnih razlogov ali zaradi neodvisnosti).
· Clarification of the circumstances and procedures for applying the discretionary clauses (humanitarian and sovereignty);
· Razširjen je obstoječi mehanizem za reševanje sporov (tako, da lahko zajema sporne zadeve v zvezi z uporabo celotne uredbe).
· Extension of the existing dispute settlement mechanism (to cover matters of dispute on the application of the entire Regulation);
· Dodana so pravila za predaje (npr. pravila o predajah, ki so izvedene pomotoma, ter o stroških predaj, kot tudi nova določba o skupni uporabi informacij pred izvedbo predaj).
· Addition of rules on transfers (e.g. rules on erroneous transfers and costs for transfers as well as a new provision on the sharing of relevant information before transfers are carried out);
· Vključena je določba o organizaciji obveznega razgovora (da se zberejo vse potrebne informacije, ki so potrebne za določitev odgovorne države članice, in da se ustno obvesti prosilce glede uporabe uredbe).
· Insertion of a provision on the organisation of a compulsory interview (to gather all necessary information in view of identifying the Member State responsible and to inform orally the applicant about the application of the Regulation).
Zagotovitev celovitega obravnavanja potreb prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito in zadostnih pravnih zaščitnih ukrepov v dublinskem postopku
Ensuring that the needs of applicants for international protection are comprehensively addressed and that adequate legal safeguards are foreseen under the