natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Natančneje se prosi Komisijo, naj v zvezi s tem prednostno preuči evropski postopek za spore majhne vrednosti, evropski nalog za izvršbo in alternativno reševanje sporov, da bi državljanom in podjetjem omogočili neposreden dostop do njih na spletu.
More specifically, the Commission is asked in this context to examine as a priority the European small-claims procedure, the European enforcement order and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) so as to permit citizens and businesses to have direct access to them on-line.
Podobno bi bilo treba ponovno pregledati uredbo o vročanju listin
Similarly, the Service of Documents Regulation
37). in uredbo o civilnem dokaznem gradivu
37). and the Civil Evidence Regulation
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 z dne 28. maja 2001 o sodelovanju med sodišči držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah (UL L 174, 27.6.2001, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p.
Cilj bi moral biti zagotoviti celovit nabor učinkovitih in enostavnih instrumentov, ki so za običajne državljane in majhna podjetja koristni ter jih lahko uporabljajo, ne pa sistem, ki je naklonjen le gospodarskim subjektom v sodnih sporih za reševanje sporov velike vrednosti.
The aim should be to provide a panoply of effective, simple instruments which are useful to and useable by ordinary citizens and small businesses, not a system which only favours commercial litigants processing bulk claims.
Ukrepi za civilne postopke
Action on civil procedure
Komisija in Svet bi morala ob upoštevanju razvoja na področju informacijske tehnologije Evropskemu parlamentu poročati o reformi in usklajevanju procesnega prava in zakonodaje o dokazovanju v čezmejnih zadevah in zadevah pred Sodiščem evropskih Skupnosti.
The Commission and the Council should report to the European Parliament on the reform and harmonisation of procedural law and the law of evidence in cross-border cases and cases before the Court of Justice, having regard to developments in the field of information technology.
Cilj bi morali biti enostavnejši, cenejši in hitrejši civilni postopki v čezmejnih zadevah.
The aim should be simpler, cheaper and faster civil proceedings in cross-border cases.
Ukrepi za pogodbeno pravo in pravo varstva potrošnikov
Action on the law of contract and consumer law
Na tem področju bi moral biti poudarek na preventivni zakonodaji z zagotavljanjem večje preglednosti in enostavnosti ter z izogibanjem pastem, težavam in stroškom, ki jih zlasti predstavlja mednarodno zasebno pravo.
Here the emphasis should be on preventive law by providing for greater clarity and simplicity and avoiding the pitfalls, problems and expense posed in particular by private international law.
V zvezi s tem se poziva Komisijo, naj začne delo na področju splošnih veljavnih pogojev za elektronsko poslovanje.
In this context, the Commission is asked to get to work on standard terms and conditions for electronic commerce.
To bi elektronskim trgovcem omogočilo, da ponudijo „modri gumb“, s katerim bi lahko potrošniki (ali seveda drugi trgovci) sprejeli uporabo standardnega evropskega pogodbenega prava za svoje transakcije.
Ultimately, this would allow electronic traders to offer a "blue button" whereby consumers (or indeed other traders) could accept the application of standard European contract law to their transactions.
Omenjeno bi lahko dopolnjeval spletni sistem za pritožbe in dostop do odobrenega spletnega alternativnega reševanja sporov.
This could be coupled with an on-line complaints system and access to approved on-line ADR.
Ukrepi glede jezikov, večjezičnosti in interoperabilnosti
Action on languages, multilingualism and interoperability
Začeti bi bilo treba program, s katerim bi preučili, kako najbolje zagotoviti spletno prevajanje za portale evropskega e-pravosodja.
A programme should be launched to examine how best to provide on-line translation facilities for the European e-Justice portals.
Vzporedno s tem bi bilo treba ustanoviti delovno skupino za poenostavitev in standardizacijo terminologije.
In parallel, a working group should be set up on simplification and standardisation of terminology.
Vsaka država članica bi morala zagotoviti zbirko podatkov o pravnih prevajalcih in tolmačih.
Each Member State should provide a database of legal translators and interpreters.
Ukrepi glede evropskih portalov e-pravosodja
Action on European e-Justice portals
O vseh omenjenih ukrepih bi morala biti obveščena enota za usklajevanje in upravljanje, ki bi bila odgovorna tudi za usklajevanje prispevkov raznih držav članic in zagotavljanje njihove interoperabilnosti.
All the above actions should feed into a coordinating and management unit, responsible also for coordinating the contributions of the various Member States and ensuring that they are interoperable.
Enota za usklajevanje in upravljanje bi morala biti odgovorna tudi za zasnovo in delovanje evropskega portala e-pravosodja, ki bi moral ponuditi prostor za državljane, ljudi iz pravne stroke ter za sodne in javne uslužbence, in poročati komisarju za pravosodje, svobodo in varnost, Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The coordinating and management unit should also bear responsibility for the design and operation of the European e-Justice portal, which should provide areas for citizens, legal professionals and the judiciary and civil servants, and report to the Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security, the European Parliament and the Council.
V letu 2011 bi bilo treba začeti študijo izvedljivosti o platformi za virtualne izmenjave.
The feasibility study for a virtual exchange platform should begin in 2011.
Pri izvedbi teh študij bi bilo treba upoštevati delo, ki ga je na tem področju že opravila notarska stroka (prepoznavanje podpisov, e-notariat, register oporok itd.).
In carrying out these studies, account should be taken of the work already carried out by the notarial profession in this field (recognition of signatures, e-Notary, register of wills, etc).
Namen tega je zagotoviti uporabniku prijazna orodja za državljane, podjetja, ljudi, ki opravljajo določene poklice, sodstvo in uradnike, odgovorne za pravosodje.
The aim is to secure user-friendly tools for citizens, businesses, practitioners, the judiciary and officials responsible for the administration of justice.
(a) Evropski portal e-pravosodja za državljane
(a) The European e-Justice Portal for Citizens
Ta večjezični portal bi moral biti oblikovan tako, da bi zagotavljal podporo državljanom in podjetjem, ki iščejo pravno pomoč in začetno pravno svetovanje o čezmejnih pravnih težavah.
This multilingual portal should be designed to afford every assistance to citizens and businesses seeking legal assistance and initial legal advice about cross-border legal problems.
Poleg dostopa do pravnih zbirk podatkov in elektronskih pravnih sredstev (spori majhne vrednosti, plačilni nalogi), spletnih sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov (vključno z omrežjem SOLVIT) in varuha človekovih pravic bi moral vključevati inteligentne sisteme, zasnovane za pomoč državljanom, ko ti iščejo načine za reševanje pravnih težav.
Apart from access to legal databases and electronic remedies (small claims, order for payment) on-line ADR schemes (including SOLVIT) and ombudsmen, it should incorporate intelligent systems designed to help citizens to find out how to deal with legal problems.
Tovrstni sistemi bi morali usmerjati ljudi pri (a) iskanju pravnika v drugi državi članici, ki govori njihov jezik, (odvetnik, notar, pravni zastopnik itd.) ter pojasnjevati, kakšne so njihove funkcije, (b) ugotavljanju, kakšna pravna pomoč, če sploh, je na voljo in (c) odločanju o tem, kako ukrepati, da bi opravili nekatere formalne postopke v posameznih državah članicah (npr. kako ustanoviti podjetje, voditi računovodstvo, oblikovati oporoko, kupiti/prodati hišo itd.).
Such systems should guide people on how (a) to find a lawyer in another Member State who speaks their language (advocate, notary, solicitor, etc), explaining their respective functions, (b) to ascertain what legal aid, if any, is available and (c) to determine what steps to take in order to carry out certain formalities in the different Member States (e.g. how to set up a company, file accounts, draw up a will, buy/sell a house, etc).
Morali bi imeti tudi možnost usmerjanja glede vrste težav, vrste postopkovnih ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti in tako dalje.
They should also be able to give a guide as to what the type of problem is, what procedural steps have to be taken and so on.
Kjer je to mogoče, bi morala biti zagotovljena brezplačna pravna pomoč po elektronski pošti, in sicer prek nacionalnih strokovnih organov in pod njihovim nadzorom.
Where possible, initial free legal advice by e-mail should be provided through, and under the supervision of, national professional bodies.
Na voljo bi morali biti vsaj imeniki pravnikov, notarjev, sodnih izvršiteljev in dostavljavcev sodnih pozivov, revizorjev, nacionalno odobrenih izvedencev ter pravnih prevajalcev in tolmačev v vsaki državi članici, skupaj s povezavami pristojnih poklicnih organov.
At the very least, directories of lawyers, notaries, bailiffs and process-servers, auditors, nationally licensed experts and legal translators and interpreters in each Member State should be available, together with links to the competent professional body.
Dosegljivi bi morali biti tudi enostavni vodniki po pravnih sistemih vseh držav članic.
Plain guides to the legal system of each Member State should also be to hand.
Omogočen bi moral biti tudi hiter dostop do nujne pravne pomoči in policije.
Rapid access to emergency legal assistance and the police should also be possible.
Poleg tega bi moral portal dovoljevati tudi dostop do različnih registrov in omogočati objavljanje nacionalnih uradnih objav.
In addition, the portal should also afford access to various registers and allow the publication of national Official Notices.
(b) Varen evropski portal e-pravosodja
(b) The secure European e-Justice Portal
Ta portal bi moral biti oblikovan tako, da bi ga kot orodje uporabljali sodniki, sodni uradniki, uradniki nacionalnih pravosodnih ministrstev in odvetniki, njegovo varnost pa bi zagotovili z različnimi pravicami glede dostopa.
This portal should be designed for use as a tool by judges, court officials, officials of the national Ministries of Justice and practising lawyers with security ensured by the provision of different access rights.
Poleg zagotavljanja dostopa do pravnih in zakonodajnih zbirk podatkov ter do največjega mogočega obsega nacionalnih registrov bi moral omogočati tudi varno komuniciranje, video-konference in izmenjavo dokumentacije med sodišči ter med sodišči in strankami v postopkih (dematerializacija postopkov).
Apart from providing access to legal and legislative databases and the fullest possible range of national registers, it should also permit secure communication, video-conferencing and document exchange between courts and between courts and parties to proceedings (dematerialisation of proceedings).
Zato bi moral dovoljevati tudi preverjanje elektronskih podpisov in predvideti ustrezne sisteme preverjanja.
To this end, it should also enable verification of electronic signatures and make provision for appropriate verification systems.
Portal bi moral dati na voljo tudi sredstva za izmenjavo informacij, na primer glede oseb, za katere je prepovedano delo z otroki ali delovanje v vlogi direktorjev podjetij.
The portal should also afford a means of exchanging information about, for instance, persons who are debarred from working with children or acting as company directors.
Kontaktne točke evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in trgovskih zadevah v državah članicah bi bilo treba spodbuditi k aktivni vlogi pri razvoju evropskega e-pravosodja, da bi prispevale k oblikovanju in zasnovi prihodnjih portalov, med njimi portala e-pravosodje za državljane kot dela politike Skupnosti s področja e-pravosodja, ki je zasnovana prav z namenom omogočanja državljanom, da neposredno dostopajo do pravosodja.
The contact points of the European Judicial Network in Civil and Commercial Matters in the Member States should be encouraged to play an active role in the development of European e-Justice by contributing to the conception and design of the future portals, including the citizens' e-Justice portal, as part of the Community's e-Justice policy, designed in particular to afford direct access to justice for citizens.
Kot začetni korak bi naj internetne strani nacionalnih ministrstev za pravosodje ponudile povezavo do strani evropske pravosodne mreže.
As an initial step, the Internet sites of the national Ministries of Justice should include a link to the site of the European Judicial Network.
Portal naj bi nudil državljanom EU informacije o kazenskopravnem sistemu držav članic, zlasti glede njihovih pravic, vključno s praktičnimi informacijami o tem, na kateri organ se lahko obrnejo in kako ter kako naj si priskrbijo obrazce, z informacijami o pravni pomoči in s seznami pravnikov, ki lahko sprejemajo tuje stranke.
The portal should give EU citizens information on the criminal justice system of the Member States, in particular regarding their rights, and should include practical information on what authority to address and how, on how obtain forms and on legal aid, as well as lists of lawyers able to deal with foreign clients.
Prek portala naj bi pravosodni delavci dostopali do zakonodaje EU ter ustrezne zakonodaje držav članic.
The portal should also provide legal practitioners with EU legislation and with relevant legislation of the Member States.
Spletne strani Usposabljanja v evropskem sodstvu (EJT), Evropske pravosodne mreže (EJN) za civilne in kazenske zadeve, Evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje (EJTN) in drugih ustanov že ponujajo veliko koristnih informacij.
The websites of European Judicial Training (EJT), the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters (EJN), the European Judicial Training Network (EJTN) and other bodies already offer much useful information.
Res pa je, da so te informacije razdrobljene in da jih ni lahko najti.
Nevertheless, this information is fragmentary and not easy to find.
Pomembne sodne odločbe bi morali biti dostopne.
Relevant judicial decisions should be made available.
Vse te informacije bi morale biti na voljo na spletu in drugače, posebno pozornost pa je treba posvetiti mehanizmom za sinhronizacijo, ki ponujajo posodobljene informacije (RSS-feed).
All this information should be available on-line and off-line, and particular attention must be paid to synchronisation mechanisms offering updated information (RSS-feed).
Sodniško usposabljanje
Judicial training
Da bi se širila evropska pravosodna kultura in da bi dosegli čim več sodnih uradnikov že v trenutku začetka njihovega delovanja, bi moral vsak novo imenovani sodni uradnik prejeti neke vrste „opremo za preživetje“ v obliki CD-ja ali ključa USB, ki bi vseboval pogodbo o EU, pogodbo o ES, temeljna besedila o pravosodnem sodelovanju ter informacije o pravosodnih sistemih drugih držav članic.
In order to spread the European judicial culture and with a view to reaching as many members of the judiciary as possible from the very first moment they join the judiciary, a sort of “survivor” kit in the form of a CD or USB key containing the EU Treaty and the EC Treaty, as well as the basic texts on judicial cooperation and information on the other Member States' judicial systems, should be given to any newly appointed member of the judiciary.
Razmisliti bi bilo treba tudi o izdaji publikacij EU, ki bi bile namenjene državljanom in bi vsebovale praktične informacije o pravosodnem sodelovanju v EU in kazenskopravnih sistemih drugih držav članic.
Consideration should also be given to EU publications addressed to citizens who provide practical information on EU judicial cooperation and the criminal justice systems of other Member States.
Komisija in Svet bi morala ustrezno pozornost nameniti tudi elektronskim orodjem za usposabljanje, ki jih daje na voljo Evropska mreža za sodniško usposabljanje, v kateri so zastopane vse šole za usposabljanje sodstva v EU.
In addition, electronic training tools offered by the EJTN, which represents judicial training schools all over the EU, should be given adequate attention and support by the Commission and the Council.
Preprečevanje mednarodnega kriminala in boj proti njemu
Preventing and fighting transnational crime
Najbolj pomemben primer uporabe e-sodstva v kazenskem pravosodju doslej je bila vzpostavitev evropskega informacijskega sistema kazenskih evidenc.
So far, the most important application of e-Justice in the context of criminal justice is the creation of the European Criminal Records Information System.
Da bi bil ta sistem učinkovit, ga je treba podpreti z elektronsko strukturo, ki bi bila sposobna povezati vse nacionalne kazenske evidence
To be effective, this system needs to be supported by an electronic structure able to interconnect all national criminal registers
Drug pomemben primer uporabe informacijske tehnologije na področju pravosodja in varnosti je schengenski informacijski sistem, obsežna zbirka podatkov, ki omogoča ustreznim organom v državah članicah izmenjavo podatkov in sodelovanje na različne načine, tudi z varnim in izredno hitrim posredovanjem evropskih nalogov za prijetje.
Another IT application of relevance to the area of justice, freedom and security is the Schengen Information System (SIS), a large-scale database enabling the relevant authorities in the Member States to exchange information and cooperate in many ways, including by transmitting, in a secure and extremely fast way, European arrest warrants.
Kot je razvidno iz resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2008
As reflected in Parliament's resolution of 2 September 2008
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2008 o pobudi Kraljevine Belgije, Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Kraljevine Španije, Republike Francije, Republike Italije, Velikega vojvodstva Luksemburg, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Avstrije, Republike Poljske, Republike Portugalske, Republike Slovenije, Republike Slovaške in Kraljevine Švedske za sprejetje Sklepa Sveta o okrepitvi Eurojusta in spremembi Sklepa 2002/187/PNZ ( P6_TA(2008)0384 ). , je Eurojust ključni akter v boju proti mednarodnem kriminalu na ravni EU.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 September 2008 on the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a Council Decision on the strengthening of Eurojust and amending Decision 2002/187/JHA ( P6_TA(2008)0384 ). , Eurojust is a key player in the fight against transnational crime at EU level.
Njegovo usklajeno delovanje je temeljnega pomena pri obravnavi težjih kaznivih dejanj, pri katerih prihaja do vse večje uporabe tehnoloških sredstev.
Its coordination action is fundamental to tackling serious crime phenomena which increasingly use technological means.
Število primerov, ki jih je v letu 2008 vodil Eurojust, se je tudi zahvaljujoč njegovemu inovativnemu sistemu obdelave podatkov (sistem E-POC) povzpelo na 1 000.
Thanks also to its innovative data-processing system (the E-POC system), the number of cases managed by Eurojust in 2008 reached the threshold of 1 000.
Te primere je treba pomnožiti in jih financirati s finančnimi sredstvi EU.
These examples must be multiplied and funded with EU financial resources.
Z evropsko konvencijo o vzajemni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah iz leta 2000 so bila določena pravila glede zaslišanja prič, obdolžencev in izvedencev z uporabo videokonference.
The 2000 European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters lays down rules on the hearing of witnesses, accused persons and experts by video-conference.
Doslej je konvencijo ratificiralo 24 držav članic.
It has now been ratified by 24 Member States.
Evropski parlament poziva države članice, naj čim prej zaključijo postopek ratifikacije.
The European Parliament calls on Member States to complete the ratification process as soon as possible.
Za sedaj še ni na voljo statističnih podatkov o praktični uporabi videokonferenc.
No statistics are yet available on the practical application of video-conferences.
Še vedno se namreč zdi, da ta način ni v celoti izkoriščen, eden od razlogov za to pa je pomanjkanje potrebne elektronske podpore.
It appears that video-conferencing is still not being fully exploited, one of the reasons being the lack of the requisite electronic support.
Podporo in finančno pomoč EU je treba zagotoviti čim prej
Support and financial assistance by the EU must be delivered as soon as possible.
Krepitev temeljnih pravic in postopkovnih jamstev
Enhancing fundamental rights and procedural safeguards
Tehnološki napredek je dobrodošel, če le ne ogroža temeljnih pravic.
Any technological progress is welcome in so far as it does not jeopardise fundamental rights.
Ob upoštevanju tega je treba pri pripravi in izvajanju strategije in akcijskega načrta veliko pozornosti nameniti spoštovanju temeljnih pravic ter zlasti postopkovnih jamstev in varstva podatkov, pri čemer je treba državljanom EU omogočiti dostop do informacij, ki jih hranijo ter si jih med seboj izmenjujejo ustrezni organi, seznaniti pa jih je treba tudi z razpoložljivimi pravnimi sredstvi.
Bearing this in mind, in drafting and implementing the strategy and the Action Plan, attention must be devoted to respect for fundamental rights and notably procedural safeguards and data protection, giving EU citizens the right to access the information stored and shared by the relevant authorities and informing them of the available remedies.
Strategija e-pravosodja ne more delovati brez uskladitve postopkovnih jamstev in ustreznih varoval za varstvo podatkov v okviru kazenskopravnega sodelovanja.
A real e-jjustice strategy cannot function without harmonisation of procedural safeguards and adequate data-protection safeguards applying to cooperation in criminal justice matters.
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve (*)
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (*)
s priporočilom Komisiji v zvezi z e-pravosodjem
with recommendations to the Commission on e-Justice
(Pobuda – člen 39 Poslovnika)
(Initiative - Rule 39 of the Rules of Procedure)
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker so elektronske tehnologije prisotne v številnih vidikih vsakdanjega življenja ljudi in bi lahko dejansko izboljšale učinkovitost nacionalnega in nadnacionalnega sodstva; ker bi se moral pravni okvir območja svobode, varnosti in pravice odražati v elektronski evropski virtualni razsežnosti, kjer bi bila pravna besedila zaradi čim bolj obsežnega oblikovanja spletnih povezav lahko razumljiva, prevedena in dostopna vsem zainteresiranim porabnikom, vključno z navadnimi državljani,
A. whereas electronic technologies have entered many aspects of our daily life and might be effective in improving the efficiency of domestic and transnational justice, and whereas the European area of justice, freedom and security legal framework should be mirrored in an electronic European virtual dimension where legal texts should be easily understandable, translated and accessible to any interested users, including ordinary citizens, by developing as far as possible on-line interactions,