natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Člen 3(3) in (4) določa, da Svet v ta namen sprejme sklep, s katerim določi datum začetka veljavnosti teh konvencij za Bolgarijo in Romunijo, ter sprejme vse potrebne prilagoditve k tem konvencijam, ki so potrebne zaradi pristopa teh dveh novih držav članic (ki v vsakem primeru vključujejo sprejetje konvencij v bolgarskem in romunskem jeziku, da lahko ti različici veljata za enako verodostojni).
Article 3(3) and 3(4) of the Act of Accession provide that, to that effect, the Council shall adopt a decision in order to determine the date on which these conventions shall enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania and to make all the necessary adjustments to these conventions required by reason of the accession of the two new Member States (which would include, in any event, the adoption of the conventions in the Bulgarian and Romanian languages, so that these versions can be "equally authentic").
Svet sprejme sklep na podlagi priporočila Komisije po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
The Council shall act on a recommendation of the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament.
Priloga I k aktu o pristopu vsebuje seznam sedmih konvencij in protokolov na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev.
Annex I to the Act of Accession gives the list of the seven conventions and protocols concerned in the Justice and Home Affairs area.
Seznam zajema tudi konvencijo o boju proti korupciji uradnikov Evropskih skupnosti ali uradnikov držav članic Evropske unije z dne 26. maja 1997, sestavljeno na podlagi člena K.3(2)(c) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
The list includes the Convention of 26 May 1997, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union, on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union.
Namen priporočila Komisije za sklep Sveta je prilagoditev navedene konvencije zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije v skladu s členom 3(4) akta o pristopu.
This Commission Recommendation for a Council Decision is intended to make the adjustments required by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the aforementioned Convention, in accordance with Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession.
Pristop Bolgarije in Romunije h Konvenciji z dne 26. maja 1997 o boju proti korupciji uradnikov Evropskih skupnosti ali uradnikov držav članic Evropske unije
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 26 May 1997 on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union
o boljši pravni ureditvi v Evropski uniji
on Better Regulation in the European Union
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................15
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............16
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................18
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 20
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................24
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2000 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu: „Boljša priprava zakonodaje 1998 – skupna odgovornost (1998)“ in „Boljša priprava zakonodaje 1999“
– having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2000 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled “Better lawmaking 1998 – A shared responsibility (1998)” and “Better lawmaking 1999”
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 29. novembra 2001 o beli knjigi Komisije o evropskem javnem upravljanju
– having regard to its resolution of 29 November 2001 on the Commission White Paper on European governance
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 8. aprila 2003 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu z naslovom „Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2000“ in „Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2001“
– having regard to its resolution of 8 April 2003 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled “Better lawmaking 2000” and “Better lawmaking 2001”
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 26. februarja 2004 o poročilu Komisije z naslovom „Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2002“
– having regard to its resolution of 26 February 2004 on the Commission report entitled “Better Lawmaking 2002”
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 9. marca 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o poenostavitvi in izboljšanju zakonodajne dejavnosti Skupnosti
– having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2004 on the Commission communication on simplifying and improving the Community’s regulatory activity
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o oceni učinka zakonodaje Skupnosti in postopkov posvetovanja
– having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on assessment of the impact of Community legislation and the consultation procedures
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o strategiji poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2004: Uporaba načela subsidiarnosti — Dvanajsto letno poročilo
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on Better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity – 12th annual report
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o izidu pregleda zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo zakonodajalca
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z dne 14. novembra 2006 z naslovom Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0689 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 14 November 2006 entitled "A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union" ( COM(2006)0689 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0273/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0273/2007 ),
A. ker je uspeh pri uresničevanju cilja boljše pravne ureditve ena glavnih prednostnih nalog Evropske unije, saj bi povečanje koristi sodobne, razumne in učinkovite zakonodaje s čim manjšimi stroški zagotovilo najvišjo raven produktivnosti, rasti, sprejetosti in končno zaposlovanja v Evropi ,
A. whereas succeeding in attaining the objective of "Better Regulation" constitutes one of the main priorities for the European Union, as maximising the benefits of modern, rational and effective legislation whilst minimising its costs would ensure the highest level of productivity, growth , acceptance and, ultimately, employment throughout Europe,
B. ker Komisija v navedenem sporočilu z dne 14. novembra 2006 analizira napredek, dosežen na področju boljše pravne ureditve, in navaja prihodnje glavne izzive, pri čemer poudarja napredek, ki je potreben na evropski ravni in na ravni držav članic, ter s tem razvija splošen pristop za enostavnejšo ter zato cenejšo uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti in nacionalne zakonodaje,
B. whereas the Commission, in its above-mentioned communication of 14 November 2006, analyses progress achieved in the area of better regulation and maps out the main challenges ahead, pointing out the progress to be made both at European level and at the level of the Member States and thus developing an overall approach aimed at making Community and national legislation easier to apply and hence less costly,
C. ker ta pristop, ki za Komisijo, Svet in Evropski parlament pomeni uporabno orodje za uresničevanje ciljev lizbonske strategije, zahteva tesno partnerstvo na tem področju, najprej med evropskimi institucijami ter nato med evropskimi institucijami in nacionalnimi organi,
C. whereas this approach, constituting for the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament a useful tool for achieving the aims of the Lisbon strategy, requires a close partnership in this area, first between the European institutions and then between the latter and the national authorities,
D. ker v navedenem sporočilu Komisija predlaga povečano spremljanje ocen učinka z uvedbo neodvisnega odbora za oceno učinka pod vodstvom predsednika Komisije ter se zavezuje, da bo sprejela bolj preventivne ukrepe in države članice že od vsega začetka spremljala, da se omogoči pravilen prenos ključnih direktiv,
D. whereas, in the above-mentioned communication, the Commission proposes to reinforce the scrutiny of impact assessments through the creation of an independent Impact Assessment Board under the authority of the Commission's President, and commits itself to taking more preventive action, following up with Member States at an early stage so as to facilitate the correct transposition of key directives,
E. ker bi morala po mnenju Komisije Evropski parlament in Svet zagotoviti bolj sistematične ocene učinka glavnih predlogov sprememb k njenim predlogom ter dati večjo prednost predlogom za poenostavitev, ki so v obravnavi, kodifikaciji in razveljavitvi zastarele zakonodaje,
E. whereas, in the Commission's view, the European Parliament and the Council should provide more systematic impact assessments of major amendments to its proposals and give higher priority to pending simplification proposals, to codification and to the repeal of obsolete legislation,
F. ker Komisija predlaga, da bi morale države članice nato razviti in izvrševati mehanizme posvetovanja in programe poenostavitve, kjer jih ni, ter bi morale spodbujati bolj sistematično oceno gospodarskih, socialnih in okoljskih učinkov, skupaj z izboljšano uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti,
F. whereas the Commission proposes that Member States should in turn develop and enforce consultation mechanisms and simplification programmes, where these are missing, and should foster a more systematic assessment of economic, social and environmental impacts, along with an improved application of Community law,
G. ker boljša pravna ureditev ni izključno zmanjševanje birokracije, zmanjševanje upravnega bremena in poenostavljanje veljavne zakonodaje ali deregulacija, ampak tudi zagotavljanje, da v zakonodajnem postopku sodelujejo vsi pomembni vladni in nevladni akterji na vseh ravneh ter da se vzpostavi tesno partnerstvo med evropskimi institucijami ter nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi z namenom, da se zagotovi kakovostna pravna ureditev ;
G. whereas better regulation is not exclusively about cutting red tape, reducing the administrative burden, simplifying existing legislation or deregulation but also involves ensuring that the legislative process is engaged with by all relevant governmental and non-governmental actors at all levels and that a close partnership is established between the European institutions and the national, regional and local authorities in order to deliver high-quality regulation,
H. ker mora biti vsaka raven upravljanja zavezana k boljši pravni ureditvi, da se zmanjša upravno breme,
H. whereas every level of governance must be committed to better regulation in order to achieve any reduction in the administrative burden,
I. ker se lokalni in regionalni organi pogosto srečujejo z nalogo izvajanja in zagotavljanja izvrševanja zakonodaje EU,
I. whereas local and regional authorities often face the task of implementing and enforcing EU law,
1. odločno podpira postopek boljše pravne ureditve, namenjene izboljšanju uspešnosti, učinkovitosti, skladnosti, odgovornosti in preglednosti zakonodaje EU; vendar poudarja, da mora tak postopek temeljiti na nekaterih predpostavkah, kot so:
Strongly supports the process of Better Regulation with a view to strengthening the effectiveness, efficiency, coherence, accountability and transparency of EU law; stresses, however, that such a process needs to be based on a number of preconditions:
i) celovita in skupna vključenost Sveta, Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta;
(i) full and joint involvement of the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament;
ii) obširno in jasno posvetovanje z vsemi pomembnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, vključno z nevladnimi organizacijami;
(ii) wide and transparent consultation of all relevant stakeholders, including non-governmental organisations;
iii) krepitev odgovornosti organov Skupnosti za zakonodajni proces in splošne preglednosti tega postopka zlasti z odprtjem sej Sveta za javni pregled, kadar Svet deluje v svoji zakonodajni vlogi;
(iii) strengthening of the accountability of Community bodies for the regulatory process, and of the general transparency of that process, in particular by opening Council meetings to public scrutiny when the Council is acting in its legislative capacity;
iv) vsaka ocena, namenjena poenostavitvi, mora enakovredno upoštevati gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike ter ne sme biti omejena na kratkoročno presojo;
(iv) any assessment aimed at simplification must consider economic, social, environmental and health aspects on an equal footing and should not be limited to short-term considerations;
v) postopek poenostavitve ne sme pod nobenim pogojem pomeniti zniževanje meril, ki jih vsebuje veljavna zakonodaja;
(v) the simplification process must under no circumstance entail lowering the standards contained in current legislation;
4. poziva Komisijo, da se bolj posveča izvajanju, zagotavljanju izvrševanja in ocenjevanju zakonodaje Skupnosti kot bistvenemu delu postopka za boljšo pravno ureditev;
Urges the Commission to place greater emphasis on the implementation, enforcement and evaluation of Community legislation, as an essential part of the Better Regulation process;
7. meni, da je potrebno, da odbor za oceno učinka zamči za izvrševanje skupne metodologije za vse ocene učinka, da se preprečijo protislovni pristopi in olajša primerljivost;
Considers it necessary that the Impact Assessment Board should guarantee the application of a common methodology for all impact assessments, so as to avoid contradictory approaches and to facilitate comparability;
11. zahteva od Komisije, da se pri pripravi ocene učinka posvetuje z vsemi zadevnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti z nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, da se lahko ustrezno upoštevajo lokalne ali regionalne različice, ter da dovolj zgodaj obvesti Parlament, Odbor regij ter vse zadevne regionalne in lokalne vladne organe o rezultatih ocene;
Requests the Commission to consult all relevant stakeholders, and in particular national, regional and local authorities, when preparing an impact assessment so that the local or regional variations can be properly taken into account, and to notify the results of the impact assessment in good time to Parliament, to the Committee of Regions and to all relevant regional and local governmental bodies;
15. vztraja, da države članice zagotovijo oceno učinka za svoje pobude na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, v skladu s členom 34(2) Pogodbe EU; meni, da se morajo države članice zavezati k priznavanju resnične obveznosti v zvezi s tem;
Insists that Member States provide an impact assessment for their initiatives in the area of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, pursuant to Article 34(2) of the EU Treaty; considers that Member States should commit themselves to recognising a real obligation in this respect;
21. poudarja, da je treba poenostaviti tudi stike med Komisijo in državljani, to je na področjih javnih naročil, finančnih storitev, raziskovalnih programov, predpisov o državni pomoči in prošenj za subvencije.
Underlines that simplification is also required in the Commission's interaction with citizens, e.g. in the areas of procurement, financial services, research programmes, State aid rules and grant applications;
27. v celoti podpira vsa prizadevanja Komisije za splošno krepitev izvrševanja zakonodaje Skupnosti z bolj preventivnimi ukrepi in spremljanjem držav članic od začetka, da se omogoči pravilen prenos ključnih direktiv, ter priporoča Evropskemu parlamentu, da ustrezno sodeluje pri takšnih pobudah;
Fully supports any efforts on the part of the Commission aimed at the general strengthening of the enforcement of Community law through more preventive action, coupled with a process of following matters up with Member States at an early stage so as to facilitate the correct transposition of key directives, and recommends that Parliament be duly associated with such initiatives;
29. meni, da poudarjanje pomena ocene učinka ne bi smelo voditi do situacije v Komisiji, ko bi se sredstva, namenjena nadzorovanju pravilnemu prenosu prava Skupnosti in za obravnavanje primerov kršitev, prerazporedila za ocene učinka; poudarja potrebo, da se povečajo sredstva za zagotavljanje, da se učinkovito nadzoruje izvrševanje prava Skupnosti;
Considers that the emphasis placed on the importance of impact assessments should not lead to a situation within the Commission whereby resources intended for monitoring the correct transposition of Community law and for processing cases of infringement are re-allocated to impact assessments; stresses the need to increase resources aimed at ensuring that the application of Community law is effectively monitored;
33. poziva Komisijo, naj si pri oblikovanju boljše pravne ureditve prizadeva, da bodo novi predpisi in njihovo izvajanje skladni, upravičljivi, pregledni in razumljivi za zainteresirane strani in upravičence;
Calls upon the Commission to ensure, while developing better regulation, that new regulations and their enforcement are consistent, justifiable, transparent and comprehensible for stakeholders and for beneficiaries;
36. spodbuja Komisijo, naj preuči alternative k zakonodaji za izboljšanje delovanja notranjega trga, vključno s samoregulacijo in z medsebojnim priznavanjem nacionalnih predpisov , pri tem pa poudarja, da to ne sme ovirati demokratičnega nadzora, ki ga izvajajo Evropski parlament in parlamenti držav članic; poudarja, da je treba na pravno ureditev Skupnosti gledati v okviru mednarodne konkurence in svetovnih trgov;
Encourages the Commission to investigate alternatives to legislation with a view to improving the functioning of the internal market, including self-regulation and the mutual recognition of national rules, while stressing that this should not impede democratic scrutiny by the European Parliament and by Member States' parliaments; underlines that Community regulation must be seen in the context of international competition and global markets;
Inštitut za evropsko okoljsko politiko (2004): Trajnostni razvoj v integrirani presoji vpliva Evropske komisije za leto 2003.
Institute for European Environment Policy (2004): Sustainable Development in the European Commission's Integrated Impact Assessments for 2003.
Inštitut za evropsko okoljsko politiko (2005): V dobro ali slabo – Agenda EU o boljši pravni ureditvi in okolje.
Institute for European Environment Policy (2005): For better or for worse - The EU's 'Better Regulation' Agenda and the environment.
- da vsaka ocena učinka enako upošteva gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike, tako kratkoročno kot dolgoročno;
- that impact assessments consider economic, social, environmental and health aspects on an equal footing, both in the short and the longer term;
- da ocene učinka ne upoštevajo zgolj stroškov ukrepov, ampak tudi stroške, ki nastanejo pri neobravnavanju vprašanj v zvezi z okoljem, javnim zdravjem in hrano;
- that impact assessments consider not only the costs of measures but also the costs of not addressing the environmental, public health or food issues;
- da so ocene učinka dovolj obsežne in upoštevajo različne nacionalne okoliščine v državah članicah.
- that the impact assessments are broad enough in scope and that they take into account the different national circumstances in the Member States;
Se zaveda, da bi lahko ocene učinka imele ključno vlogo pri predlogih sprememb Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta in k tem morebitno bistveno prispevale;
recognises that impact assessments could also play an essential role in the case of amendments proposed by the European Parliament or the Council having potentially significant impacts;
- uporaba informacijske tehnologije za zmanjšanje upravne obremenitve;
- the use of information technology to reduce the administrative burden;
- poenostavitev in povezovanje sistemov za izdajanje dovoljenj in licenc, pri tem pa ohranjati okoljske in zdravstvene standarde;
- the simplification and integration of permit schemes and licensing, while safeguarding environmental and health standards;
45. poziva države članice, da med zakonodajnim postopkom oblikujejo in izvajajo mehanizme posvetovanja z regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, upoštevajo njihovo zaskrbljenost med ministrskimi pogajanji ter okrepijo njihovo vlogo v postopku prenosa in izvajanja zakonodaje EU;
Calls upon the Member States to develop and to implement consultation mechanisms with the regional and local authorities during the legislative process, to take into account their concerns during ministerial negotiations and to reinforce their role during the process of transposition and implementation of EU legislation;
48. spodbuja organe v državah članicah, da pripravijo formalne strategije za prenos, da se jasno določijo vloge in odgovornosti regionalnih in nacionalnih vlad za boljši in hitrejši prenos;
Encourages authorities in the Member States to draw up formal transposition strategies, in order to clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the regional and national governments for better and faster transposition;
50. poziva Komisijo, da pospeši dokončanje obsežne in prosto dostopne javne zbirke podatkov o nacionalnih izvedbenih zakonih, vključno z nacionalnimi različicami, kadar je to primerno;
Calls upon the Commission to speed up the completion of a comprehensive, freely accessible public database of national implementing laws, including regional variations where appropriate;
53. poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša zagotavljanje informacij o prenosu in postopkih za ugotavljanje kršitev, da bodo te informacije javne in lahko dostopne na spletnih straneh Komisije;
Requests the Commission to improve the provision of information about transposition and infringement proceedings, and to make this information public and easily accessible on the Commission's website.
V zadnjih letih je Evropska komisija vedno bolj zaskrbljena zaradi kakovosti zakonodaje Skupnosti glede jasnosti in dostopnosti na eni strani ter glede njene učinkovitosti in pozitivnega učinka na državljane in podjetja na drugi strani.
In recent years, the European Commission has become more and more concerned about the quality of Community legislation, both in terms of clarity and accessibility, on the one hand, and of effectiveness and positive impact on citizens and businesses, on the other.
Komisija se običajno sklicuje na te cilje kot na boljšo pravno ureditev ali boljšo pripravo zakonodaje.
The Commission usually refers to all these goals as to "Better Regulation" or "Better Lawmaking".
Cilj boljše pravne ureditve je dejansko povečati koristi sodobne, razumne in učinkovite zakonodaje s čim manjšimi stroški, da se lahko v Evropski uniji zagotovi najvišja raven produktivnosti, rasti in nazadnje zaposlovanja.
As a matter of fact, Better Regulation aims at maximising the benefits of a modern, rational and effective legislation whilst minimising its costs, so that productivity, growth and, ultimately, employment can be ensured at the highest level throughout the European Union.
V zvezi s področjem uporabe boljša pravna ureditev zajema oblikovanje politike od njene začetne zasnove do izvajanja in izvrševanja, pri čemer se skrbno uporablja načelo subsidiarnosti.
As for its scope, Better Regulation covers policy making, from its initial conception through to implementation and enforcement starting with the careful application of the principle of subsidiarity.