natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
J. ker v skladu s členom 295 Pogodba o ES „v ničemer ne posega v lastninskopravno ureditev v državah članicah“; ker glede na sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti ta določba zgolj priznava pristojnost držav članic, da opredeljujejo pravila o lastninskopravnem sistemu in ker je sodna praksa Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti potrdila, da se mora pristojnost držav članic v tej zvezi vedno uporabljati v povezavi s temeljnimi načeli prava Skupnosti, kot so prosti pretok blaga, oseb, storitev in kapitala (glej sodbo z dne 22. junija 1976 v zadevi C-19/75 Terrapin proti Terranova [1976] Zbirka odločb sodne prakse 1039),
J. whereas according to Article 295, the EC Treaty “shall in no way prejudice the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership”; whereas, according to the case-law of the Court of Justice, that provision merely recognises the power of Member States to define the rules governing the system of property ownership; and whereas the case-law of the Court of Justice has confirmed that the competence of Member States in this respect must always be applied in conjunction with the fundamental principles of Community law, such as the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital (see the judgment of 22 June 1976 in Case C-119/75 Terrapin v Terranova [1976] ECR 1039),
K. ker pa Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti dosledno potrjuje, da čeprav je lastninska pravica sestavni del splošnih načel prava Skupnosti, ni absolutna pravica in jo je treba razumeti v povezavi z njeno družbeno funkcijo in se torej njeno izvajanje lahko omeji, pod pogojem, da se omejitve dejansko skladajo s cilji splošnega interesa, za katere se zavzema Skupnost, ter ne povzročajo prekomernega in nedopustnega posega, ki bi ogrožal samo bistvo zagotovljenih pravic (glej sodbo z dne 10. decembra 2002 v zadevi C-491/01 British American Tobacco (Investments) in Imperial Tobacco [2002] Zbirka odločb sodne prakse I11453),
K. whereas, however, the Court of Justice has consistently held that, whilst the right to property forms part of the general principles of Community law, it is not an absolute right and must be viewed in relation to its social function and whereas, consequently, its exercise may be restricted, provided that those restrictions in fact correspond to objectives of general interest pursued by the Community and do not constitute a disproportionate and intolerable interference, impairing the very substance of the rights guaranteed (see the judgment of 10 December 2002 in Case C-491/01 British American Tobacco (Investments) and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I‑11453),
L. ker ne glede na to, da sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča dosledno potrjuje, da kjer nacionalne določbe ne spadajo v področje prava Skupnosti, ta ni pristojna za oceno skladnosti ter določb s temeljnimi pravicami, katerih spoštovanje Sodišče zagotavlja (gl. na primer sklep z dne 6. oktobra 2005 v zadevi C-328/04 Vajnai [2005] Zbirka odločb sodne prakse I-8577), odstavka 12 in 13),
L. whereas, notwithstanding that case-law, the Court of Justice has consistently held that, where national provisions fall outside the scope of Community law, there is no Community jurisdiction to assess the compatibility of those provisions with the fundamental rights whose observance the Court ensures (see, for instance, the order of 6 October 2005 in Case C-328/04 Vajnai [2005] ECR I-8577, paragraphs 12 and 13),
M. ker prvi odstavek člena 1 prvega dodatnega protokola k EKČP pravi, da ima „vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba […] pravico do spoštovanja svojega premoženja“ in da „nikomur ne sme biti lastnina odvzeta, razen če je to v javnem interesu v skladu s pogoji, ki jih določa zakon, in ob spoštovanju splošnih načel mednarodnega prava“; ker drugi odstavek tega člena pravi, da se „pravica držav, da uveljavijo zakone, za katere menijo, da so potrebni“, lahko uporablja samo „za nadzor nad uporabo premoženja v skladu s splošnim interesom ali za zagotovitev plačila davkov, drugih prispevkov ali denarnih kazni“; in ker je Španija v času ratifikacije omenjenega protokola izrazila zadržek o členu 1 ob upoštevanju člena 33 španske ustave, ki določa: "Priznava se pravica do zasebne lastnine in dedovanja.
M. whereas the first paragraph of Article 1 of the first Additional Protocol to the ECHR declares that “[e]very natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions” and that “[n]o one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law”; whereas the second paragraph of that article states that “[t]he preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties”; and whereas, at the time of ratification of the said Protocol, Spain expressed a reservation in respect of Article 1 in the light of Article 33 of the Spanish Constitution, which provides as follows: “The right to private property and inheritance is recognised.
Družbena vloga teh pravic določa njun obseg njihove vsebine v skladu z zakoni.
The social function of these rights shall determine the limits of their content in accordance with the law.
N. ker Parlament meni, da je obveznost odstopitve zakonito pridobljene zasebne lastnine brez predpisanega postopka in ustreznega nadomestila in obveznost plačila samovoljnih stroškov za nezahtevan in pogosto nepotreben razvoj infrastrukture, kršitev temeljnih pravic posameznika na podlagi EKČP in sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice (glej na primer Aka proti Turčiji
N. whereas Parliament considers that the obligation to cede legitimately acquired private property without due process and proper compensation and the obligation to pay arbitrary costs for unrequested and often unnecessary infrastructure development constitute a violation of an individual's fundamental rights under the ECHR and in the light of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (see, for instance, Aka v. Turkey
Sodba z dne 23. septembra 1998; glej tudi resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. junija 2007 o rezultatih misije za ugotavljanje dejstev, opravljene v imenu Odbora za peticije v pokrajinah Andaluzija, Valencia in Madrid (UL C 146 E, 12.6.2008, str.
Judgment of 23 September 1998; see also Parliament's resolution of 21 June 2007 on the results of the fact-finding mission to the regions of Andalucía, Valencia and Madrid conducted on behalf of the Committee on Petitions (OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p.
O. ker so leta 2008 španski organi lansko leto objavili tolmačenje za uporabo zakona o obalnih območjih iz leta 1989, ki se ga dolga leta ni spoštovalo, v tem času pa je bila na obalnih območjih Španije povzročena huda okoljska škoda; ker celo to tolmačenje ne določa jasnih izvedbenih ukrepov, ki naj bi jih upoštevali zadevni lokalni in regionalni organi, ter ker številne nove peticije pričajo o retroaktivnosti teh navodil, samovoljnem uničevanju in rušenju zakonito pridobljenih nepremičnin posameznikov, njihovih pravic do te lastnine in njihove zmožnosti, da bi te pravice z dedovanjem prenašali naprej,
O. whereas in 2008 the Spanish authorities issued instructions regarding the application of the 1988 Coastal Law, which had been neglected for many years during which time extensive environmental damage was done to coastal areas in Spain; whereas even the current instructions do not provide for clear implementing measures to be followed by the local and regional authorities involved, and whereas many new petitions received bear witness to the retroactive contents of the instructions and the arbitrary destruction and demolition of individuals' legitimately acquired property, their rights to such property and their ability to transfer their rights by means of inheritance,
P. ker so prizadeti zaradi dejanskega poteka razmejitvene črte dobili vtis, da gre za namerno obremenjevanje nepremičnin, ki so v lasti tujcev, kot na primer na otoku Formentera,
P. whereas, in view of the actual course of the demarcation line, those affected have formed the strong impression that it has been defined arbitrarily at the expense of foreign owners, for example on the island of Formentera,
Q. ker zakon o obalnih območjih nesorazmerno vpliva na lastnike posameznih nepremičnin, katerih pravice bi morale biti v celoti spoštovane, obenem pa nezadostno vpliva na dejanske krivce za uničevanje obalnih območij, ki so bili v številnih primerih odgovorni za čezmeren urbani razvoj ob obali, vključno s počitniškimi kraji, in ki so se prav gotovo dobro zavedali, da ravnajo v nasprotju z zakonom,
Q. whereas the Coastal Law impacts disproportionately on individual property owners who should have their rights fully respected, and at the same time insufficiently on the real perpetrators of coastal destruction, who have in many instances been responsible for excessive urban developments along the coasts, including holiday resorts, and who had good grounds for knowing that they were invariably acting contrary to the provisions of the law in question,
R. ker je v tem mandatu Parlamenta Odbor za peticije na podlagi velikega števila prejetih peticij opravil podrobno preiskavo, trikrat poročal o obsegu kršitev zakonitih pravic državljanov EU do njihove zakonito pridobljene lastnine v Španiji in tudi natančno opisal skrbi v zvezi z ogrožanjem trajnostnega razvoja, varstva okolja, kakovosti in preskrbe z vodo, postopki javnih naročil v zvezi z urbanističnimi pogodbami ter nezadostnim nadzorom nad postopki urbanizacije pri številnih lokalnih in regionalnih organih v Španiji,
R. whereas in the course of the current parliamentary term the Committee on Petitions, acting in response to the very large number of petitions received, has conducted detailed investigations, has reported three times on the extent of the abuse of the legitimate rights of EU citizens to their legally acquired property in Spain, and has also detailed its concerns in relation to the undermining of sustainable development, environmental protection, water quality and provision, procedures concerning public procurement with regard to urbanisation contracts and insufficient control of urbanisation procedures by many local and regional authorities in Spain
S. ker je veliko primerov, ko so pristojni organi na vseh ravneh, tako osrednji, avtonomni kot lokalni, odgovorni za uvedbo modela netrajnostnega razvoja, ki je imel zelo hude okoljske, pa tudi socialne in gospodarske posledice,
S. whereas there are many examples of cases where every level of authority, from central to autonomous and local, has been responsible for setting in motion a model for unsustainable development that has had extremely serious environmental consequences, as well as economic and social repercussions,
T. ker je Parlament prejel številne peticije od posameznikov in različnih organizacij, ki zastopajo državljane EU, v katerih so se pritožili nad različnimi vidiki urbanistične dejavnosti, ter je ugotovil, da pri številnih problemih, ki so bili v njih navedeni, ne gre za kršenje prava Skupnosti, kot izhaja iz sporočil državam članicam, rešiti pa bi jih bilo treba po pravni poti zadevne države članice,
T. whereas Parliament has received many petitions from private individuals and from various organisations representing EU citizens, complaining about different aspects of urbanisation, and whereas it has noted that many of the issues raised in the petitions submitted in relation to urban expansion do not constitute infringements of Community law, as is evidenced by the communications to the Member States, and should be settled by exhausting the legal remedies available in the Member States concerned,
U. ker obstaja vedno več dokazov, da so se pravosodni organi v Španiji začeli odzivati na problem pretirane urbanizacije v številnih obalnih območjih, zlasti s preiskavami in z obtožnicami proti nekaterim podkupljivim lokalnim uradnikom, ki so s svojimi dejanji omogočili neurejen urbani razvoj brez primere in s tem kratili pravice državljanov EU ter nepopravljivo poškodovali biotsko raznovrstnost in celovitost okolja v številnih regijah v Španiji; ker pa je Parlament na podlagi teh obtožnic ugotovil, da so postopki še naprej nezaslišano počasni in da sodb, izrečenih v številnih primerih, ni mogoče izvršiti na način, ki bi zadovoljil žrtve takih zlorab, zaradi česar se je pri številnih prizadetih državljanih EU, ki niso državljani Španije, pojavil občutek nedejavnosti ali pristranskosti španskih sodišč; ker pa je treba opozoriti, da je potem, ko so izrabljene vse možnosti pravnih sredstev v domači državi, ustrezen naslov za pritožbe Sodišče za človekove pravice,
U. whereas there is growing evidence that the judicial authorities in Spain have begun to respond to the challenge resulting from excessive urbanisation in many coastal areas, in particular by investigating and bringing charges to bear against certain corrupt local officials who, by their actions, have facilitated unprecedented and unregulated urban developments to the detriment of the rights of EU citizens, thereby damaging irretrievably the biodiversity and environmental integrity of many regions of Spain; whereas Parliament has observed, however, in response to such charges, that procedures remain outrageously slow and that the sentences handed down in many of these cases are incapable of being enforced in a way which provides any satisfaction to the victims of such abuse, and whereas this has strengthened the impression shared by many non-Spanish EU citizens affected regarding the inactivity and/or partiality of Spanish justice; whereas it is noteworthy, however, that there is also an avenue of appeal to the European Court of Human Rights, once domestic remedies have been exhausted,
V. ker je tako razširjen pojav, ki ga podpira neodgovorno ravnanje lokalnih in regionalnih organov z neprimerno in včasih neutemeljeno zakonodajo, ki je v številnih primerih v nasprotju s cilji več evropskih zakonodajnih aktov, zelo škodljiv za podobo Španije in za njene širše gospodarske in politične interese v Evropi, enako pa velja za nepravilno izvajanje urbanistične in okoljske zakonodaje v španskih avtonomnih pokrajinah pri nekaterih urbanističnih dejavnostih ter pojav nekaterih primerov hude korupcije, ki izhajajo iz take zlorabe,
V. whereas such widespread activity, supported by irresponsible local and regional authorities through inadequate and sometimes unjustified legislation which in many cases runs counter to the objectives of several European legislative acts, has been most damaging to the image of Spain and to its broader economic and political interests in Europe, as have the lax application of the urban planning and environmental laws in force in the Spanish autonomous communities to certain urban development operations, as well as the emergence of major cases of corruption stemming from such abuse,
W. ker so regionalni varuhi človekovih pravic v zelo težkih okoliščinah pogosto ukrepali za varovanje interesov državljanov EU v primerih, povezanih z zlorabami na področju urbanizacije, čeprav regionalni organi v nekaterih avtonomnih pokrajinah včasih niso upoštevali njihovih prizadevanj,
W. whereas regional ombudsmen have frequently acted, in very difficult circumstances, to defend the interests of EU citizens in cases related to urbanisation abuses, although in some autonomous communities regional governments have on occasion been able to pay no heed to their efforts,
X. ker se člen 33 španske ustave sklicuje na pravice posameznikov do svoje lastnine in ker obstajajo tudi drugačne razlage navedenega člena, zlasti kar zadeva družbeno lastnino v nasprotju s pravico posameznikov do njihovih zakonito pridobljenih domov in stanovanj, ker v pokrajini Valencia ni bila izrečena sodba glede uporabe zemljiškega prava,
X. whereas Article 33 of the Spanish Constitution makes reference to the rights of individuals to their property, and whereas there have been different interpretations of that article, notably as regards the provision of property for social use as opposed to the rights of individuals to their legally acquired homes and dwellings; whereas no ruling on the application of the land laws in the Valencian region has been given,
Y. ker člen 47 španske ustave določa, da imajo vsi Španci pravico do dostojnega in primernega stanovanja, in obvezuje javne organe, da spodbujajo vzpostavitev ustreznih pogojev in oblikujejo ustrezne standarde za dejansko izpolnjevanje te pravice ter uredijo rabo zemljišč v skladu s splošnim interesom, da se preprečijo špekulacije,
Y. whereas Article 47 of the Spanish Constitution provides that all Spaniards have the right to enjoy decent and adequate housing, and tasks the public authorities with promoting the requisite conditions and establishing the relevant rules to make that right effective, and with regulating land use in the general interest in order to prevent speculation,
Z. ker je nacionalna vlada v Španiji dolžna izvajati Pogodbo o ES in varovati ter zagotavljati uporabo evropske zakonodaje na svojem ozemlju, ne glede na notranjo organizacijo političnih organov, kot je določeno z ustavo Kraljevine Španije,
Z. whereas the national government in Spain has a duty to apply the EC Treaty and to defend and ensure the full application of European law on its territory, irrespective of the internal organisation of the political authorities as established by the Constitution of the Kingdom of Spain,
Aa. ker je Komisija v skladu s pooblastili, ki jih ima na podlagi člena 226 Pogodbe o ES, pred Sodiščem sprožila postopek proti Španiji v zvezi z zlorabami zaradi prekomerne urbanizacije, ki se dogaja v Španiji in neposredno zadeva izvajanje direktive o javnih naročilih s strani organov oblasti v Valencii
Aa. whereas the Commission, acting pursuant to the powers conferred on it by Article 226 of the EC Treaty, has brought proceedings against Spain before the Court of Justice in a case involving the excessive urbanisation abuses which have occurred in Spain which directly concerns the implementation by the Valencian authorities of the Directive on Public Procurement
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/18/ES z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev (UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str.
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p.
Ab. ker je Komisija na zahtevo Odbora za peticije sprožila preiskavo več kakor 250 urbanističnih projektov, ki so prejeli negativno mnenje od pristojnih organov za vodo in organov za povodje in ker lahko na podlagi te preiskave projekti kršijo direktivo o vodah, zlasti v Andaluziji, Castilla-la-Manchi, Murcii in Valencii,
Ab. whereas the Commission, at the request of the Committee on Petitions, has launched an investigation into more than 250 urbanisation projects which have received a negative opinion from the competent water authorities and river basin authorities and which may therefore place the projects in contravention of the Water Framework Directive
Ad. ker v številnih dokumentiranih primerih težav na področju urbanizacije v Španiji Komisija ni ukrepala dovolj odločno, ne samo v zvezi z izvajanjem previdnostnega načela okoljske zakonodaje ampak tudi zaradi ohlapne razlage dejanj pristojnih lokalnih ali regionalnih organov, ki imajo zavezujoč pravni učinek, kot je „začasna odobritev“ integriranega urbanističnega razvojnega načrta s strani lokalnega organa,
Ad. whereas in many documented cases of urbanisation problems in Spain the Commission has failed to act sufficiently forcefully, not only as regards enforcement of the precautionary principle of environmental law but also because of its lax interpretation of acts by competent local or regional authorities which have binding legal effect, such as the “provisional approval” of an integrated urban development plan by a local authority,
Ae. ker je cilj direktive o strateški presoji vpliva na okolje
Ae. whereas the objective of the Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/42/ES z dne 27. junija 2001 o presoji vplivov nekaterih načrtov in programov na okolje (UL L 197, 21.7.2001, str.
Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p.
30). , katere člen 3 izrecno pokriva turizem in urbanizacijo, zagotoviti visoko raven varstva okolja ter prispevati k vključevanju okoljskih vprašanj v pripravo in sprejem načrtov in programov za spodbujanje trajnostnega razvoja, in ker okvirna direktiva o vodah od držav članic zahteva, da preprečijo slabšanje svojih voda in spodbujajo trajnostno rabo sladkovodnih virov,
30. , Article 3 of which explicitly covers tourism and urbanisation, is to provide for a high level of protection of the environment and to contribute to the integration of environmental considerations into the preparation and adoption of plans and programmes with a view to promoting sustainable development; and whereas the Water Framework Directive requires Member States to prevent the deterioration of their waters and to promote the sustainable use of their fresh water resources,
Af. ker so obiski Odbora za peticije, namenjeni ugotavljanju dejstev, ki so sledili, pokazali, da si nekateri lokalni in regionalni organi te cilje očitno pogosto razlagajo napačno (ne samo v obalnih regijah), kadar predlagajo obsežne urbanistične programe ali se z njimi strinjajo; ker številni urbanistični načrti, ki jim peticije nasprotujejo, zadevajo spremembo namembnosti kmetijskih zemljišč v zemljišča, namenjena urbanizaciji, ki urbanističnim agentom in gradbenim podjetjem prinašajo velike ekonomske koristi; in ker se v številnih primerih spremeni namembnost zaščitenih zemljišč ali zemljišč, ki bi morala biti zaščitena zaradi svoje občutljive biotske raznovrstnosti, in se ta zemljišča umaknejo s seznama, ali pa na seznam sploh niso uvrščena prav z namenom, da se omogoči urbanizacija zadevnega območja,
Af. whereas successive fact-finding visits by the Committee on Petitions have shown that these objectives seem to be frequently misunderstood by some local and regional authorities (not just in the coastal regions) when proposing or agreeing to extensive urbanisation programmes; whereas most urbanisation plans contested by petitions involve the reclassification of rural land into land zoned for urbanisation – to the considerable economic benefit of the urbanisation agent and the developer; and whereas there are also many instances of protected land, or land which should be protected because of its sensitive biodiversity, being de-listed and reclassified, or not being listed at all, precisely to allow for urbanisation of the area concerned,
Ag. ker ta vprašanja stopnjujejo zlorabo, ki jo občuti na tisoče državljanov EU, ki zaradi načrtov urbanističnih agentov niso samo izgubili svoje zakonito pridobljene lastnine, ampak so tudi prisiljeni plačevati samovoljne stroške nezaželenih, pogosto nepotrebnih in neupravičenih infrastrukturnih projektov, ki neposredno vplivajo na njihove lastninske pravice, katerih končni rezultat je finančna in čustvena katastrofa za številne družine,
Ag. whereas such considerations compound the abuse which is felt by thousands of EU citizens who, as a result of the plans of the urbanisation agents, have not only lost their legitimately acquired property but have been forced to pay the arbitrary cost of unwanted, often unnecessary and unwarranted infrastructure projects directly affecting their property rights, the end result of which has been financial and emotional catastrophe for many families,