natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
— ukrepov sodelovanja, tudi na področju zakonodajnega dela, in ukrepov v zvezi z dokumentacijo, analizami ter informacijami, vključno s tistimi ukrepi, ki jih izvaja Evropski center za parlamentarne raziskave in dokumentacijo (ECPRD).
— cooperation measures, including those linked to legislative work, and measures linked to documentation, analysis and information, including those carried out by the ECPRD.
Člen 3 2 5 – Odhodki za informacijske pisarne
Article 3 2 5 — Expenditure relating to Information Offices
Sredstva so namenjena vsem izdatkom (pisarniške potrebščine, telekomunikacije, stroški dobave, vodenje, prevoz, drugi manjši izdatki), povezanih z informacijskimi pisarnami Evropskega parlamenta.
This appropriation is intended to cover all expenditure (office supplies, telecommunications, delivery charges, handling, transport, miscellaneous incidental expenditure) linked to the Information Offices of the European Parliament.
Poglavje 4 0 – POSEBNI ODHODKI NEKATERIH INSTITUCIJ IN ORGANOV
Chapter 4 0 — EXPENDITURE RELATING TO CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES
Pravilnik, ki ga je 1. februarja 2001 s sklepom sprejelo predsedstvo in ki je bil nazadnje spremenjen 20. septembra 2010.
Rules adopted by the Bureau decision of 1 February 2001, as last amended on 20 September 2010.
Pogodba o Evropski uniji, člen 10(4).
Article 10(4) of the Treaty on European Union.
Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije, člen 224.
Article 224 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sklep predsedstva Evropskega parlamenta z dne 29. marca 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2004/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o predpisih, ki urejajo delovanje političnih strank na evropski ravni, in pravilih glede njihovega financiranja.
Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 29 March 2004 laying down the procedures for implementing Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding.
Člen 4 0 3 – Prispevek evropskim političnim ustanovam
Article 4 0 3 — Contributions to European political foundations
Poglavje 4 2 – ODHODKI ZA PARLAMENTARNO POMOČ
Chapter 4 2 — EXPENDITURE RELATING TO PARLIAMENTARY ASSISTANCE
Postavka 4 2 2 0 – Parlamentarna pomoč
Item 4 2 2 0 — Parliamentary assistance
Poglavje 4 4 – SREČANJA IN DRUGE DEJAVNOSTI SEDANJIH IN NEKDANJIH POSLANCEV
Chapter 4 4 — MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES OF CURRENT AND FORMER MEMBERS
Sredstva so namenjena stroškom sej združenja nekdanjih poslancev Evropskega parlamenta in morebitnim drugim, s tem povezanim stroškom.
This appropriation is intended to cover the cost of meetings of the association of former Members of the European Parliament plus any other associated costs, if appropriate.
Opremljanje prostorov
Fitting-out of premises
Varnost in nadzor stavb
Security and surveillance of buildings
Poglavje 10 1 – REZERVA ZA NEPREDVIDENE IZDATKE
Chapter 10 1 — CONTINGENCY RESERVE
Poglavje 10 5 – ZAČASNA SREDSTVA ZA NEPREMIČNINE
Chapter 10 5 — PROVISIONAL APPROPRIATION FOR BUILDINGS
RAZPORED DELOVNIH MEST
ESTABLISHMENT PLAN
Funkcionalna skupina in razred
Function group and grade
Od tega je bilo petim zaposlenim odobreno napredovanje ad personam (trije AD14 v AD15, en AST10 v AST11 in en AST4 v AST5), ki se v izjemnih primerih podeli zaslužnim uradnikom.
Of which five ad personam promotions (three AD 14 to AD 15, one AST 10 to AST 11, and one AST 4 to AST 5) granted in exceptional cases to deserving officials.
Od tega 4 delovna mesta AD za polovični delovni čas (jezikovni učitelji) in eno delovno mesto AD10 za 5 let (GD IPOL).
Of which four half-time AD (language teachers) and one AD 10 (DG IPOL) limited to five years.
Od tega pet napredovanj "ad personam" (trije AD 14 v AD 15, en AST 10 v AST 11 ter en AST 4 v AST 5), odobrenih v izjemnih primerih za zaslužne uradnike.
Of which five ad personam promotions (three AD 14 to AD 15, one AST 10 to AST 11, and one AST 4 to AST 5) granted in exceptional cases to deserving officials.
Eno delovno mesto AD5 in štiri delovna mesta AST3 (poklicno usposabljanje) ter dve delovni mesti AD5 in dve delovni mesti AST1 (prevajanje) so v razporedu delovnih mest razvrščena v rezervo brez dodeljenih sredstev.
One AD 5 and four AST 3 (professional training) plus two AD 5 and two AST 1 (translation) ) have been entered in the establishment plan with no allocation of appropriations.
Prihodki od dobave blaga drugim institucijam ali organom
Proceeds from the supply of goods to other institutions or bodies
Prihodki od opravljenih storitev in del za druge institucije ali organe, skupaj z nadomestili stroškov službenih potovanj, ki so bila plačana v imenu drugih institucij ali organov
Proceeds from the supply of services and works for other institutions or bodies, including refunds by other institutions or bodies of mission allowances paid on their behalf
Prihodki od tretjih oseb za storitve ali gradbena dela, opravljena na njihovo zahtevo
Revenue from third parties in respect of services or work supplied at their request
Prihodki iz vračila nepravilno izplačanih zneskov
Revenue arising from the repayment of amounts wrongly paid
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek II – Svet
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2009, Section II – Council
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009
– having regard to the European Union general budget for the financial year 2009
– ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009 ( SEC(2010)0963 – C7-0213/2010 )
– having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2009 ( SEC(2010)0963 – C7‑0213/2010 )
UL C 308, 12.11.2010, str.
OJ C 308, 12.11.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Sveta organu za podeljevanje razrešnice o notranjih revizijah, opravljenih leta 2009,
– having regard to the Council's annual report to the discharge authority on internal audits carried out in 2009,
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2009, skupaj z odgovori institucij
– having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2009, together with the institutions' replies
– ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo je Računsko sodišče pripravilo v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije
– having regard to the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0088/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0088/2011 ),
s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek II – Svet
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2009, Section II – Council
1. , zlasti njenih členov 50, 86, 145, 146 in 147,
1. , and in particular Articles 50, 86, 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
A. ker "imajo državljani pravico vedeti, kako se porabijo njihovi davki in kako se uporabljajo pristojnosti, ki so zaupane političnim organom"
A. whereas "citizens have the right to know how their taxes are being spent and how the power entrusted to political bodies is handled"
Evropska pobuda za preglednost. ,
The European Transparency Initiative. ,
B. ker je bilo v sklepih Evropskega sveta iz Kölna z dne 3. in 4. junija 1999 predvideno, da se Svetu dodelijo operativne zmogljivosti na področju okrepljene skupne evropske varnostne in obrambne politike,
B. whereas the conclusions of the European Council of Cologne of 3 and 4 June 1999 envisaged giving operational capacities to the Council in the field of a strengthened common European security and defence policy,
C. ker je bil s Sklepom Sveta 2004/197/SZVP
C. whereas Council Decision 2004/197/CFSP
68. z dne 23. februarja 2004 vzpostavljen mehanizem ATHENA za upravljanje financiranja skupnih stroškov operacij Evropske unije, ki so vojaškega ali obrambnega pomena, in ker ta sklep skupaj s Sklepom 2004/582/ES predstavnikov vlad držav članic z zasedanja Sveta z dne 28. aprila 2004 o privilegijih in imunitetah, zagotovljenih mehanizmu ATHENA
68. of 23 February 2004 established a mechanism to administer the financing of the common costs of European Union operations having military or defence implications, called ATHENA, and whereas that Decision, together with Decision 2004/582/EC of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 28 April 2004 concerning privileges and immunities granted to ATHENA
D. ker Sklep Sveta 2000/178/SZVP z dne 28. februarja 2000 o pravilih za domače izvedence na vojaškem področju, dodeljene generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta, v začasnem obdobju
D. whereas Council Decision 2000/178/CFSP of 28 February 2000 on the rules applicable to national experts in the military field on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council during the interim period
2. meni, da imajo institucije Unije, v skladu s členom 335 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, določeno upravno samostojnost pri svojem delovanju, ta samostojnost pa vključuje zadevno stopnjo odgovornosti in zanesljivosti; ker je Parlament edini neposredno izvoljeni organ, in ker je ena od njegovih nalog, da na priporočilo Sveta poda sklep o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije, se je odločil, da bo to samostojnost odrazil v postopku razrešnice in ločil razdelke splošnega proračuna, ki jih samostojno upravlja vsaka druga institucija Unije, in da podeli razrešnico vsaki od teh institucij;
Believes that since Article 335 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union recognises that Union institutions possess a certain administrative autonomy in their operation, this autonomy implies a corresponding degree of responsibility and accountability; whereas Parliament is the sole directly elected body, and one of its tasks is, acting on the Council's recommendation, to give discharge in respect of the implementation of the Union general budget, Parliament has decided to reflect this autonomy in the discharge procedure, and to set apart the sections of the general budget which are autonomously administered by each of the other Union institutions, and to give discharge to each of those institutions;
24. o razrešnici za Svet za proračunsko leto 2008, zlasti poziva Svet, da skupaj s Parlamentom oblikuje letni postopek znotraj postopka razrešnice, da se ponudijo vse informacije, potrebne za izvrševanje proračuna Sveta;
24. on the Council discharge for the financial year 2008, in particular, its call on the Council to establish together with Parliament an annual procedure within the discharge procedure with a view to providing all the information needed as regards the execution of the Council budget;
– poročilo o izvrševanju proračuna za predhodno proračunsko leto,
– accounts of the preceding financial year relating to the implementation of the budget,
– izkaz stanja sredstev in obveznosti,
– a financial statement of the assets and liabilities,
– letno poročilo o dejavnostih glede njihovega proračunskega in finančnega upravljanja,
– annual activity report on their budget and financial management,
– letno poročilo notranjega revizorja,
– annual report of the internal auditor,
kot tudi ustno predstavitev, ki poteka na seji odbora, pristojnega za postopek razrešnice";
as well as an oral presentation given in the meeting of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure";
8. se seznanja z dobro voljo madžarskega predsedstva in z doseženim napredkom; za izboljšanje izmenjave informacij pri postopku razrešnice predlaga, da je treba slediti istim postopku, ki mu sledijo ostale institucije, glavni elementi katerega naj bi bili:
Notes the goodwill of the Hungarian Presidency and the progress achieved; proposes, in order to facilitate the exchange of information in the discharge procedure, to follow the same approach as the rest of the other institutions, the fundamental elements of which should be:
– potek uradnega srečanja med predstavniki Sveta in parlamentarnim odborom, pristojnim za postopek razrešnice, na katerem bi sodelovali generalni sekretar Sveta in predsedujoči Svetu, predsedstvo odbora, pristojnega za postopek razrešnice, poročevalec in poslanci, ki predstavljajo politične skupine (koordinatorji in/ali poročevalci v senci), da se priskrbijo vse potrebne informacije o izvrševanju proračuna Sveta;
– that a formal meeting be held between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, to be attended by the Secretary-General of the Council and the Presidency in office, the bureau of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, the rapporteur and the members representing political groups (coordinators and/or shadow rapporteurs) in order to provide all the necessary information on the implementation of the Council budget,
– generalni sekretar Sveta bi moral odgovoriti na vprašanja, ki jih je Svetu predložil odbor, pristojen za postopek razrešnice; ter
– that the Secretary-General of the Council answer questions submitted to the Council by the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure; and
– priprava časovnega razporeda za racionalizacijo in okrepitev te začasne rešitve;
– that a timetable be established so as to streamline and stabilise this interim solution;
zato meni, da je ideja o sklenitvi medinstitucionalnega sporazuma s Svetom o razrešnici Sveta nepotrebna;
thus considers the idea of concluding an interinstitutional agreement with the Council on the Council's discharge to be unnecessary;
(a) Svet ni sprejel nobenega poziva, naj se uradno in formalno sestane z odborom Parlamenta, pristojnim za postopek razrešnice, ali z njegovim poročevalcem, da bi razpravljali o izvrševanju proračuna Sveta za leto 2009,
(a) the Council has not accepted any invitation to officially and formally meet Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure or its rapporteur to discuss matters concerning the Council budget execution for 2009,
(b) Svet ni želel podati pisnega odgovora, v katerem bi Parlamentu zagotovil informacije in dokumente, ki so jih od Sveta zahtevali v prilogi pisma z dne 14. decembra 2010, ki ga je podpisal poročevalec,
(b) the Council refused to provide a written answer providing Parliament with the information and documents requested from the Council in the annex to a letter of 14 December 2010 signed by the rapporteur,
(c) Parlament ni od Sveta prejel temeljnih dokumentov, na primer popolnega seznama proračunskih prerazporeditev;
(c) Parliament has not received fundamental documents from the Council, such as the full list of budgetary transfers;
Nadaljnji ukrepi, ki jih mora sprejeti Svet
Further actions to be taken by the Council
(a) Glede prejšnje razprave o razrešnici Svetu v odboru Parlamenta, pristojnem za postopek razrešnice, se Svet teh sej ni redno udeleževal, vendar pa velja, da je udeležba Sveta bistvenega pomena, da bi odgovoril na vprašanja članov odbora o razrešnici Svetu.
(a) with regard to previous Council discharge debates in Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, the Council did not attend these meetings regularly, however, it is considered of utmost importance that the Council attends in order to reply to committee members' questions referring to the Council discharge.
Ali se Svet strinja s tem, da se bo v prihodnje udeleževal razprav o razrešnici Svetu, ki potekajo v odboru Parlamenta, pristojnem za postopek razrešnice?
Does the Council agree to attend future debates in Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure on the Council discharge?
(b) Zakaj Svet vsako letos spremeni predstavitev/format notranje revizije?
(b) why does the Council change the presentation/the format of the internal audit every year?
Zakaj je slednja vsako leto tako kratka, splošna in nejasna?
Why is the internal audit so short, generic and unclear every year?
Ali Svet lahko za razrešnico za leto 2010 in v prihodnje predloži notranjo revizijo še v kakem drugem jeziku (jezikih) kot v francoščini?
Will the Council for the 2010 discharge onwards please present the internal audit in (a) language(s) other than French?
(c) Ali je bila opravljena zunanja revizija?
(c) has an external audit been carried out?
Če je bila, ali jo lahko vidi odbor Parlamenta, pristojen za postopek razrešnice?
If so, may Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure see it?
Če zunanje revizije ni bilo, zakaj se Svet ni odločil zanjo?
If an external audit does not exist, why has the Council chosen not to make one?
(d) Do sedaj so dejavnosti Sveta pomenile sofinanciranje s Komisijo, ki se je po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe povečalo.
(d) until now, the activity of the Council implied co-financing with the Commission, which has experienced an increase after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Kateri revizijski in nadzorni sistemi so se oblikovali, da bi zagotovili popolno preglednost?
What audit and control systems have been put in place to ensure full transparency?
Glede na to, da se je z Lizbonsko pogodbo povečalo sofinanciranje s Komisijo, kako Svet razume "odgovarjati na primerne poizvedbe"?
Given that the Treaty of Lisbon increased the co-financing with the Commission, what is the Council's understanding of "respond to the appropriate enquiries"?
(e) Računsko sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za 2009 ugotovilo, da v dveh od šestih revidiranih postopkov javnih naročil Svet ni upošteval pravil finančne uredbe glede objave izida postopka.
(e) the Court of Auditors, in its Annual Report 2009, found that in two out of six procurement procedures audited, the Council did not respect the rules of the Financial Regulation for the publication of the outcome of the procedure.
Ali je Svet temeljito preučil dodatne primere podobnih naročil?
Has the Council scrutinised more samples of similar procurements?
Ali se je notranji postopek poenotil, da v prihodnje ne bi več prihajalo do podobnih primerov?
Has the internal procedure been streamlined in order to avoid similar cases in the future?
(f) Za osebje posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije: Prosim navedite število zaposlenih (vse osebje, kadrovski načrt in preostalo) – število delovnih mest, stopnje – za osebje posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije v Svetu v letu 2009.
(f) staff of European Union Special Representatives (EUSRs): Please indicate the staff (all staff, establishment plan and others) – number of posts, grade – for the EUSRs in the Council for 2009.
Kako in kdaj se bodo kadrovska mesta za osebje posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije porazdelila med Svetom in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje (ESZD)?
In which way and when will the EUSRs-staff posts be allocated between the Council and the European External Action Service (EEAS)?
Koliko je znašal proračun za potovanje za osebje posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije?
What was the travel budget for each of the EUSRs?
Koliko ljudi iz osebja posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije je bilo 1. januarja 2011 premeščenih v ESZD?
How many of the EUSRs' staff were transferred on 1 January 2011 to the EEAS?
Koliko jih bo ostalo pri Svetu in zakaj?
How many will remain with the Council and why?
(g) Svet proračunska vprašanja, povezana s posledicami Lizbonske pogodbe, izpostavlja v točki 2.2. poročila o finančnih dejavnosti – 11327/10, FIN 278.
(g) the Council highlights budgetary questions concerning the consequences of the Treaty of Lisbon in point 2.2 in the financial activity report – 11327/10, FIN 278.
Kateri del odhodkov spada pod proračun Sveta in kateri pod proračun Komisije?
What part of the expenditures falls under the Council budget and what part falls under the Commission budget?
(h) Kakšni so bili odhodki iz poslovanja, upravni odhodki, odhodki za osebje, stavbe, itd., ki jih je Svet načrtoval za leto 2009, da bi uvedel mesto visokega predstavnika/podpredsednika Komisije?
(h) what were the operational expenditures, administrative expenditures, staff, buildings, etc envisaged by the Council for 2009 in order to set up the High Representative/Vice President of the Commission (HR/VP)?
(i) Visoka predstavnica/podpredsednica Komisije je funkcijo prevzela 1. decembra 2009.
(i) the HR/VP came into office on 1 December, 2009.
Kako so bili porazdeljeni stroški med Svetom in Komisijo (za osebje, potovanja, itd.)?
How was the cost distributed between the Council and the Commission (for staff, travel, etc.)?
Kako je Svet pripravil proračun za visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico Komisije za leto 2010?
How did the Council prepare the budget for the HR/VP for 2010?
Katere proračunske vrstice in zneski so namenjeni njenim dejavnostim?
Which budget lines and sums were reserved for her activities?
(j) Kako bodo pisarniški prostori, ki so se sprostili s premestitvijo osebja v ESZD, vplivali na načrte Sveta glede stavb?
(j) how will office space released in the process of staff transfer to the EEAS influence Council's plans on buildings?
Ali so bili sprejeti dogovori za nadaljnjo rabo teh prostorov?
Have arrangements been made for the subsequent use of such office space?
Kakšni so načrtovani stroški selitve?
What is the anticipated cost for the removals?
Kdaj so bili objavljeni javni razpisi za selitve (če so bili)?
When were calls for tenders for the removals (if any) published?
(k) Kakšni so bili upravni odhodki in odhodki iz poslovanja, povezani z nalogami skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP)/skupne varnostne in obrambne politike (SVOP), ki so se vsaj delno financirale iz proračune Unije za leto 2009?
(k) what was the administrative and operational expenditure related to the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)/Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) tasks, which were at least part-financed from the Union budget in 2009?
Kakšen je celotni znesek za odhodke SZVP v letu 2009?
What was the total amount of CFSP expenditure in 2009?
Ali lahko Svet navede vsaj glavne naloge in njihove stroške v letu 2009?
Could the Council identify at least the main missions and their cost in 2009?
(l) Kakšen je bil strošek srečanj delovnih skupin Sveta za SZVP/SVOP v Bruslju in drugod in kje so ta srečanja potekala?
(l) what was the cost of meetings for Council working groups on CFSP/CSDP in Brussels and elsewhere and where did these meetings take place?
(m) Kakšni so bili upravni odhodki za izvajanje vojaških operacij v okviru skupne varnostne in obrambne politike (SVOP)?
(m) what was the administrative expenditure relating to the implementation of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP)/CSDP military operations?
Kakšen del skupnega zneska odhodkov za vojaške operacije je bil plačan iz proračuna Unije?
What share of the total amount of expenditures arising from military operations has been charged to the Union budget?
(n) Kakšni so bili administrativni odhodki, porabljeni za delovanje mehanizma ATHENA, ter koliko delovnih mest je bilo potrebnih za ta mehanizem, in ali se bo katero od njih preneslo na ESZD?
(n) what was the administrative expenditure implemented for the operation of the "ATHENA" mechanism, how many posts were needed for that mechanism, will any of the posts in question be transferred to the EEAS?
Komu bodo ta delovna mesta podrejena?
To whom will the postholders report?
(o) Stopnja zasedenosti delovnih mest v kadrovskem načrtu Sveta je nizka (91 % leta 2009 in 90 % leta 2008).
(o) there is a low occupation rate of posts in the Council's establishment plan (91 % in 2009, 90 % in 2008).
Ali ima ta stalna nizka stopnja negativne posledice na delovanje generalnega sekretariata Sveta?
Does this consistently low rate cause any repercussions on how the Council's General Secretariat (CGS) functions?