natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlagana pravna podlaga sta člena 133 in 175 v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES.
The legal basis proposed is Articles 133 and 175, read in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300 (3) of the EC Treaty.
Predlagano je bilo, naj odbor spremeni pravno podlago tako, da se bo sklicevala na drugi pododstavek člena 300(3) in ne na prvi pododstavek te določbe.
It has been suggested that the legal basis ought to be amended so as to refer to the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) rather than the first subparagraph of that provision.
Pristojni odbor je za mnenje zaprosil pravno službo, ki podpira to spremembo pravne podlage.
The lead committee has sought the opinion of the Legal Service, which supports this change in the legal basis.
Z izjemo sporazumov iz člena 133(3) sklepa Svet sporazume po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom, tudi kadar sporazum zajema področje, pri katerem je za sprejetje notranjih predpisov potreben postopek iz členov 251 ali 252.
The Council shall conclude agreements after consulting the European Parliament, except for the agreements referred to in Article 133(3), including cases where the agreement covers a field for which the procedure referred to in Article 251 or that referred to in Article 252 is required for the adoption of internal rules.
Evropski parlament poda svoje mnenje v roku, ki ga lahko glede na nujnost zadeve določi Svet.
The European Parliament shall deliver its opinion within a time-limit which the Council may lay down according to the urgency of the matter.
Če ne poda mnenja v tem roku, lahko Svet ukrepa.
In the absence of an opinion within that time-limit, the Council may act.
Naj že v začetku omenimo, da je potrebno glede na uveljavljeno sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča
It is noted, in limine , that it is settled case-law of the Court of Justice
Glej zadevo C-338/01 Komisija proti Svetu [2004] ECR.
1 See Case C-338/01 Commission v. Council [2004] ECR.
Obravnavani predlog vsebuje sedem uvodnih izjav in dva člena, ki podajajo soglasje k sklenitvi mednarodnega sporazuma o tropskem lesu iz leta 2006.
The content of proposal under consideration consists in seven recitals and two articles approving the conclusion of the International Tropical Timber Agreement, 2006.
Glede na uvodno izjavo 4 so cilji sporazuma usklajeni s skupno trgovinsko politiko in z okoljsko politiko.
Recital 4 states that the goals of the Agreement are consistent with both the common commercial policy and the environmental policy.
Glavni cilji sporazuma so določeni v členu 1 sporazuma, in sicer: „spodbujati širjenje in večjo raznolikost mednarodne trgovine s tropskim lesom iz gozdov, ki so trajnostno upravljani in kjer je sekanje legalno, ter spodbujati trajnostno upravljanje z gozdovi, ki proizvajajo tropski les“.
The main objectives of the Agreement are addressed in Article 1 of the Agreement as follows: "to promote the expansion and diversification of international trade in tropical timber from sustainable managed and legally harvested forest and to promote the sustainable management of tropical timber producing forests".
Sporazum ima naslednja poglavja: cilji, opredelitve, organizacija in upravljanje, Mednarodni svet za tropski les, privilegiji in imunitete, financiranje, operativne dejavnosti, statistika, študije in informiranje, razno in končne določbe.
The Agreement is organised in chapters as follows: objectives, definitions, organisation and administration, International Tropical Timber Council, privileges and immunities, finance, operational activities, statistics, studies and information, miscellaneous, and final provisions.
Ugotovljeno je, da pristojni odbor v osnutku poročila z dne 7. novembra 2007 svojo odobritev mednarodnega sporazuma o trgovini s tropskim lesom opredeljuje kot „podporo s pridržki“, saj je sporazum nezadovoljiv.
It is noted that, in its draft report of 7 November 2007, the Committee responsible qualifies its approval of the International Trade Timber Agreement "as a reluctant endorsement of an unsatisfactory agreement".
Poročevalec se pritožuje, da izid sporazuma „ne zadostuje potrebam, ki jih narekuje učinkovito soočanje z izgubo tropskih gozdov“.
The Rapporteur complains that the outcome of the Agreement "falls well short of what is required to address the problem of loss of tropical forest".
Glede na pojem „poseben institucionalni okvir“ v smislu drugega pododstavka člena 300(3) bi veljalo, da mora Sodišče še osvetliti način njegove interpretacije.
As far as the concept of a "specific institutional framework" within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) is concerned, it is observed the Court of Justice has yet to cast any light on how is it to be interpreted.
Zato bi bilo koristno navesti nekaj splošnih premislekov za utemeljitev uporabe postopka privolitve v drugem pododstavku člena 300(2) kot protiuteži postopku posvetovanja, določenem v prvem pododstavku te določbe.
In view of this, it is considered worthwhile setting out some general considerations about the rationale for providing for the use of the assent procedure in the second subparagraph of Article300(2) as opposed to the consultation procedure laid down in the first subparagraph of that provision.
Določba o privolitvi se uporablja pri štirih vrstah dokumentov:
The assent provision is provided for four types of acts:
- sporazumih, ki imajo znatne proračunske posledice za Skupnost,
- agreements having important budgetary implications for the Community;
- sporazumih, ki sprožijo predlog za spremembo dokumenta, sprejetega s postopkom soodločanja,
- agreements entailing amendment of an act adopted under the codecision procedure;
- sporazumih o pridružitvi, ki vključujejo vzajemne pravice in obveznosti, skupne ukrepe in posebne postopke,
- agreements establishing an association involving reciprocal rights and obligations, common action and special procedures;
- sporazumov, ki z uvedbo postopkov sodelovanja vzpostavljajo poseben institucionalni okvir.
- agreements establishing a specific institutional framework by organising cooperation procedures.
Za oblikovanje določbe o postopku privolitve je možno podati razloge, navedene v nadaljevanju.
It may be argued that provision is made for the assent procedure on the following grounds.
Prva dva primera odražata vlogo Parlamenta v proračunskem postopku in postopku soodločanja.
The first two cases reflect Parliament's role in the budgetary procedure and in the codecision procedure, respectively.
Sporazumi iz tretje in četrte alinee imajo en skupen vidik, to je namen vzpostavitve kompleksne stalne strukture, do neke mere neodvisne od udeleženih strani, kar ji omogoča sprejetje pravil, zavezujočih za strani, ki v sam sporazum niso vključene.
For their part, the agreements covered by the third and fourth indents above have one aspect in common, namely the intention of setting up a complex permanent structure having a certain autonomy from the parties under which rules binding on the parties other than those contained in the agreement itself may be adopted.
Če pride do pridružitve, zna biti struktura bolj zapletena kot v primeru, ko se vzpostavi poseben institucionalni okvir z uvedbo postopkov sodelovanja.
Where an association is established, the structure is likely to be more sophisticated than it is where a specific institutional framework is established by organising cooperation procedures.
Zahtevo po privolitvi Parlamenta se lahko pojasni s tem, da je obravnavani sporazum „nepopoln“, ker doseganje njegovih ciljev ni odvisno le od pravil, izrecno določenih v samem besedilu sporazuma.
It may be argued that the assent of Parliament is required because the agreement in question is "incomplete" in the sense that the attainment of its objectives does not depend only on the rules expressly laid down in the text of the agreement itself.
Udeležene strani ne bodo zavezovala le pravila, določena v sporazumu, temveč tudi tista, ki jih bodo narekovali v njem določeni postopki.
The parties will be not bound only by the rules set out in the agreement but also by rules which will be established as the result of the procedures set up in it.
Posledična negotovost glede dejanskih dolžnosti, ki bodo izhajale iz sporazuma, zahteva, da se zagotovi privolitev Parlamenta.
The resulting degree of uncertainty as to what actual duties will arise out of the Agreement requires the guarantee of parliamentary assent.
Zato je treba ugotoviti, ali spada obravnavani sporazum v kategorijo „sporazumov, ki z uvedbo postopkov sodelovanja vzpostavljajo poseben institucionalni okvir“.
The question to be answered, therefore, is whether or not the agreement under consideration falls within the category of "agreements establishing a specific institutional framework by organising cooperation procedures".
Bistveni elementi, ki morajo biti prisotni, če naj bi se uporabljal drugi pododstavek člena 300(3), so funkcionalno povezani: treba je namreč uvesti „postopke sodelovanja“ in potreben je „poseben institucionalni okvir“.
The essential elements which have to be present if the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) is to apply are functionally linked: namely "cooperation procedures" have to be organised and there has to be a "specific institutional framework".
Glavni cilj sporazuma je „spodbujati širjenje in večjo raznolikost mednarodne trgovine s tropskim lesom iz gozdov, ki so trajnostno upravljani in kjer je sekanje legalno, ter trajnostno upravljanje z gozdovi, ki proizvajajo tropski les, spodbujati“ (člen 1).
The main objective of the agreement is "to promote the expansion and diversification of international trade in tropical timber from sustainable managed and legally harvested forest and to promote the sustainable management of tropical timber producing forests" (Article 1).
Da bi to dosegli, ponuja sporazum nekaj učinkovitih orodij.
To achieve this, the Agreement provides for some elaborate tools.
Prvič, člen 3 navaja, da „Mednarodna organizacija za tropski les (...) še naprej obstaja za namen izpolnjevanja določb in nadzora izvajanja tega sporazuma“.
First, Article 3 provides that "The International Tropical Timber Organisation (...) shall continue in being for the purposes of administering the provisions and supervising the operation of this Agreement".
Delovanje organizacije zagotavljajo Svet (člen 6), odbori in druga pomožna telesa (člen 26) ter izvršni direktor in osebje (člen 14).
The functioning of the organisation is to be assured by the Council (Article 6), the committees and other subsidiary bodies (Article 26), the Executive Director and the staff (Article 14).
Svet naj bi veljal za „najvišjo avtoriteto organizacije“, sestavljati pa ga morajo predstavniki vsake članice.
The Council is stated to be the "highest authority of the Organization" and is to consist of representatives of each member.
Ena od najpomembnejših pristojnosti Sveta je, da „sprejema odločitve, ki so potrebne za zagotovitev smotrnega in učinkovitega funkcioniranja in delovanja organizacije“ (člen 7, točka (b)).
One of the Council's most important powers is to "take such decisions as are necessary to ensure the effective and efficient functioning and operation of the Organisation" (Article 7, point (b)).
V ta namen členi 10, 11 in 12 določajo pravila, po katerih poteka sprejemanje odločitev in postopek glasovanja.
To this end, Articles 10, 11 and 12 set out the rules governing the decision-making process and the voting procedure.
Pomembno je omeniti, da sklepov ni nujno sprejemati le s soglasjem.
It is important to note that decisions are not only to be taken by consensus.
Čeprav je predvideno, da „si Svet prizadeva sprejeti vse sklepe in oblikovati vsa priporočila s soglasjem“, drugi odstavek člena 12 navaja, da „Svet, če soglasja ni mogoče doseči, vse sklepe in vsa priporočila sprejme oziroma oblikuje z glasovanjem z navadno večino, razen kadar ta sporazum predvideva posebno glasovanje“.
Even though it is provided that "the Council shall endeavour to take all decisions and to make all recommendations by consensus", the second paragraph of Article 12 provides that "if consensus cannot be reached, the Council shall take all decisions and make all recommendations by a simple distributed majority vote, unless this Agreement provides for a special vote".
Drugo zadevno pravilo je določeno v členu 13, in sicer glede sklepčnosti za sejo Sveta, ker je videti, da za sprejetje sklepov ni potrebna navzočnost vseh predstavnikov.
Another relevant rule is set out in Article 13 concerning the quorum for the meeting of the Council, since it appears that it is not necessary for all representatives to be present in order for decisions to be adopted.
Pomen teh določb se pokaže v povezavi s členom 29, odstavek 2, ki določa, da: „se članice zavezujejo, da bodo sprejemale in izvajale sklepe Sveta na podlagi določb tega sporazuma in se bodo izogibale izvajanju ukrepov, ki bi jih omejevali ali bili v nasprotju z njimi“.
2, which provides that: "Members undertake to accept and carry out the decisions of the Council under the provisions of this Agreement and shall refrain from implementing measures that would have the effect of limiting or running counter to them".
Drugače povedano, sklepi Sveta bodo zavezujoči celo za tiste udeležene strani, katerih predstavniki se niso strinjali s sprejetjem akta ali se seje niso udeležili.
In other words, decisions of the Council will be binding even on those parties whose representatives did not agree with the adoption of the act or who were not present at the meeting.
Poleg tega člen 17 organizacijo opredeljuje kot pravno osebo, ki je sposobna sklepati pogodbe, pridobivati in prodajati premičnine in nepremičnine ter sprožati sodne postopke.
Furthermore, Article 17 confers legal personality to the Organisation and the "capacity to contract, to acquire and dispose of movable and immovable property, and to institute legal proceedings".
In na koncu je treba upoštevati odprtje „upravnega računa, ki je račun za odmerjene prispevke“, „posebnega računa in Partnerskega sklada Bali, ki sta računa za prostovoljne prispevke“, ter „druge račune, za katere bi Svet lahko menil, da so ustrezni in potrebni“ (člen 18), kot tudi pomembne funkcije Sveta v zvezi s članstvom organizacije in obstojem sporazuma (členi 30, 31, 32, 37, 40, 42, 44 in 47).
Finally, account must be taken of the establishment of "the Administrative Account, which is an assessed contribution account", "the Special Account and The Bali Partnership Fund, which are voluntary contribution accounts", and "other accounts that the Council might consider appropriate and necessary" (Article 18) and of the Council's major functions relating to membership of the Organization and the existence of the agreement (arts 30, 31, 32, 37, 40, 42, 44 and 47).
V luči gornje analize naj bi veljalo, da sporazum vzpostavlja „poseben institucionalni okvir“.
In the light of the analysis carried out above, it is considered that the agreement establishes a "specific institutional framework".
Tako je Odbor za pravne zadeve na svoji seji 19. decembra 2007 soglasno
At its meeting of 19 December 2007 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 338/97 o varstvu prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst z zakonsko ureditvijo trgovine z njimi kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila – Prilagoditev regulativnemu postopku s pregledom
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission - Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0104 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0104 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 175(1) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6–0087/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0087/2006 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6–0314/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0314/2008 ),
Varstvo prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst z zakonsko ureditvijo trgovine z njimi kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila – Prilagoditev regulativnemu postopku s pregledom
Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny - protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein
o predlogu odločbe Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o ribolovu za južni Indijski ocean v imenu Evropske skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI.......................................8
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASE................8
– ob upoštevanju predloga odločbe Sveta ( KOM(2007)0831 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0831 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Articles 37 and 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0047/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0047/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve o predlagani pravni podlagi,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal base,
– ob upoštevanju členov 51 in 35 ter člena 83(7) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 51, 35 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6–0315/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0315/2008 ),
Predlog odločbe
Proposal for a Council decision – amending act
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 37 v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) ter prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37 in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 37 v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) ter drugega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37 in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
Leta 2000 so ribiške države južnega Indijskega oceana sprožile pobudo za ustanovitev nove regionalne ribiške organizacije (Sporazum o ribolovu za južni Indijski ocean).
In 2000, the South Indian Ocean fishing states took the initiative to set up a new regional fisheries organisation (Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement).
Po petih medvladnih konferencah (zadnja je bila v Mombasi v Keniji aprila 2005) so zainteresirane strani dosegle sporazum o osnutku ribiškega sporazuma.
After five intergovernmental conferences, the last one held in Mombasa, Kenya, in April 2005, the interested parties reached agreement on a draft fisheries agreement.
Ko je to besedilo pregledala uredniška skupina, je postalo končni dokument, ki je bil sprejet in na voljo za podpis na diplomatski konferenci 7. julija 2006 v Rimu.
This text, after a review by an editorial group, constituted the final text which was adopted and then opened for signature at a diplomatic conference held in Rome on 7 July 2006.
Skupnost ima ribolovne interese v južnem Indijskem oceanu in je tudi obalna država v imenu otoka Reunion.
The Community has fishing interests in the South Indian Ocean and is also a Coastal State on behalf of Réunion.
Skupnost je zato dolžna, da v okviru določb konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu sodeluje z drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi pri upravljanju in ohranjanju regionalnih virov.
The Community is therefore obliged, under the terms of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, to cooperate with other interested parties in the management and conservation of the region's resources.
Skupnost je podpisala Sporazum SIOFA 7. julija 2006 v skladu s Sklepom Sveta št. 2006/496/ES z dne 6. julija 2006.
The Community signed the SIOFA Agreement on 7 July 2006 in conformity with Council Decision 2006/496/EC of 6 July 2006.
21. decembra 2007 je Evropska komisija posredovala Svetu predlog odločbe o sklenitvi sporazuma o ribolovu za južni Indijski ocean v imenu Evropske skupnosti.
On 21 December 2007, the European Commission forwarded to the Council a proposal for a decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement.
Svet se je 30. januarja 2008 odločil, da se o tem sporazumu posvetuje s Parlamentom ter nam posredoval zahtevo za posvetovanje.
The Council decided on 30 January 2008 to consult Parliament on this agreement and sent to us a request for consultation.
3. februarja 2008 je naš odbor od Odbora za pravne zadeve zahteval, da preveri pravno podlago teh dokumentov, saj menimo, da ne gre za posvetovanje, ampak za privolitev (člen 35 poslovnika EP).
On 3 February 2008, our committee called on the Committee on Legal Affairs to verify the legal basis of this dossier, since we considered that it was not a case of consultation, but rather of assent (Rule 35 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure).
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na svoji seji 26. februarja 2008 odgovoril, da gre dejansko za privolitev, saj je za mednarodni sporazum predviden poseben institucionalni okvir (ustanovitev pomožnih organov, ki bodo sprejemali pomembne odločitve).
At the meeting of 26 February 2008, the Committee on Legal Affairs responded to our request stating that it was indeed a case of assent, since a specific institutional framework was being laid down in the international agreement concerned (establishment of subsidiary bodies which will take important decisions).
ČLEN 7 – POMOŽNI ORGANI
ARTICLE 7 – SUBSIDIARY BODIES
Na zasedanju pogodbenic se ustanovi stalni Znanstveni odbor , ki se sestane vsaj enkrat letno, razen če se na zasedanju pogodbenic ne odloči drugače, in po možnosti pred zasedanjem pogodbenic v skladu z naslednjimi določbami:
The Meeting of the Parties shall establish a permanent Scientific Committee , which shall meet, unless the Meeting of the Parties otherwise decides, at least once a year, and preferably prior to the Meeting of the Parties, in accordance with the following provisions:
a) naloge Znanstvenega odbora so:
(a) the functions of the Scientific Committee shall be:
(i) opraviti znanstveno oceno ribolovnih virov in vpliva ribolova na morsko okolje, ob upoštevanju okoljskih in oceanografskih značilnosti območja ter izsledkov ustreznih znanstvenih raziskav;
(i) to conduct the scientific assessment of the fishery resources and the impact of fishing on the marine environment, taking into account the environmental and oceanographic characteristics of the Area, and the results of relevant scientific research;
(ii) spodbujati in pospeševati sodelovanje pri znanstvenih raziskavah za izboljšanje znanja o stanju ribolovnih virov;
(ii) to encourage and promote cooperation in scientific research in order to improve knowledge of the state of the fishery resources;
(iii) zagotoviti znanstvena mnenja in priporočila zasedanju pogodbenic za oblikovanje ukrepov za ohranjanje in upravljanje iz člena 6(1)(d);
(iii) to provide scientific advice and recommendations to the Meeting of the Parties for the formulation of the conservation and management measures referred to in article 6(1)(d);