natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· splošna pravila o nepristranskosti in navzkrižju interesov;
· general rules on impartiality and conflicts of interest;
· posebna pravila o nezdružljivosti obveznosti uradnikov s prejšnjimi ali sočasnimi poklicnimi dejavnostmi; omejitve glede poklicnih obveznosti ali drugih nalog po končanju mandata;
· specific rules on incompatibility between office-holders' duties and previous or concurrent professional activities; restrictions on professional commitments or other duties after time in office;
UL C 223, 22.09.07, str.
OJ C 223, 22.9.07, p.
25. se strinja z evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic (primer 3269/2005/TN), da je nujno treba razkriti imena posameznih lobistov, ki se sestajajo s komisarji;
Agrees with the European Ombudsman (case 3269/2005/TN) that the disclosure of the names of individual lobbyists holding meetings with Commissioners is essential;
Izterjatve, odpovedi izterjatev
Recoveries, waivers of recoveries
- izterjava neupravičeno nakazanih zneskov, ki so jih plačale države članice kmetijskim organizacijam ali organom, ki so sodelovali pri strukturnih ukrepih iz malomarnosti ali včasih namernih napak,
- recovery of sums unduly paid by the Member States to agricultural organisations or bodies participating in structural actions, in the wake of diverse errors arising from negligence or which are, occasionally, deliberate in nature,
- izterjava denarnih kazni, ki jih je določila Komisija organizacijam ali državam članicam;
- recovery of fines imposed by the Commission on organisations or Member States,
- izterjava lastnih sredstev od držav članic v okviru običajnega postopka izterjave dolgovanih zneskov,
- recovery of own resources from the Member States, under the normal procedure for recovery of sums due,
27. še vedno obžaluje, da so, kot je navedeno v odstavku 36 resolucije z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o izterjavi sredstev Skupnosti
Reiterates its regret, as expressed in paragraph 36 of its resolution of 24 October 2006 on the recovery of Community funds
125. , ustrezne informacije v zvezi z izterjavo sredstev Skupnosti izključene iz pobude za preglednost v Evropi; poziva Komisijo, da proračunskemu organu in javnosti omogoči dostop do imen upravičencev in zneskov, za katere je predvidena izterjava ali ki so že vknjiženi v proračun EU, ter da pojasni dokončni namen teh sredstev;
125. , that information regarding recoveries of Community funds is excluded from the European Transparency Initiative; calls on the Commission to make available to the budgetary authority and ultimately to the public the names and amounts of recoveries due under or credited to the EU budget, as well as the final destination of these sums;
29. meni, da mora Komisija v rednih časovnih razmikih Parlamentu predložiti pregled še odprtih terjatev, razčlenjenih po skupnem dolgovanem znesku glede na posamezen generalni direktorat in po starosti odprtih terjatev, ter jih, če je to mogoče, objaviti na svoji spletni strani;
Considers that the Commission should submit to Parliament, at regular intervals, and, possibly, publish on its website, an overview of outstanding amounts to be recovered broken down by the total owed per Directorate-General (DG) and the length of time for which each amount has been outstanding;
67–71); ugotavlja, da je bila leta 2006 skupna vrednost izdanih nalogov za izterjavo 634.000.000 EUR; upa, da bo Komisija v prihodnosti te vrstice še izboljšala, da bo povečala preglednost;
Welcomes the publication in the 2006 provisional accounts (volume 1, pp. 67-71) of a chapter on the recovery of expenditure in the notes to the economic outturn account; notes that the total value of recovery orders issued in 2006 was EUR 634 000 000; hopes that the Commission will in future make further improvements along these lines with a view to increasing transparency;
Sestava strokovnih skupin, ki svetujejo Komisiji
Composition of expert groups advising the Commission
34. pozdravlja obveznosti, ki jih je na zahtevo Odbora za proračunski nadzor prevzel podpredsednik Kallas, da bodo od leta 2008 dalje:
Welcomes the undertakings given by Vice-President Kallas at the request of its Committee on Budgetary Control, that with effect from 2008:
· imena vseh članov uradnih in neuradnih skupin objavljena in na razpolago v registru strokovnih skupin Komisije,
· the names of all members of both formal and informal groups will be published and available via the register of expert groups of the Commission,
· za vse strokovnjake in namestnike, pa tudi za opazovalce, ko udeležba vpliva na proračun, v registru strokovnih skupin objavljeni in na razpolago javnosti ime, poklic, spol, država in organ, ki ga predstavljajo, ko je to primerno, razen če so podani upravičeni razlogi,
· for all experts and alternates, as well observers where the participation has a budgetary effect, the name, professional title, gender, country and where applicable the represented body, will be disclosed, unless legitimate compelling grounds are given, and made publicly available via the register of expert groups,
· lahko osebni podatki, ki na tej podlagi ne bodo objavljeni, Evropskemu parlamentu predloženi za vsak posamezen primer, brez poseganja v Uredbo 45/2001
· the personal data not disclosed on this basis can be provided to the European Parliament, on a case by case basis, without prejudice to Regulation 45/2001
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti ter o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 8, 12.1.2001. str.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p.
1). , skladno z ustreznimi določbami priloge I okvirnega sporazuma,
1). under the relevant provisions of Annex I of the Framework Agreement,
· razvili napredni iskalni mehanizem, ki bo omogočil iskanje po ključnih besedah v vseh metapodatkih in na primer tudi iskanje števila strokovnjakov po državi in sestavi;
· an advanced search mechanism will be deployed enabling the viewer to search by key-words in all the metadata and, for instance, to search for the number of experts, by country, by composition;
· neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki Komisiji pomagajo pri izvajanju okvirnih programov za raziskave in razvoj,
· independent experts charged with assisting the Commission in the implementation of framework programmes for research and development,
· sektorskih in medsektorskih odborov za socialni dialog (leta 2005 jih je delovalo približno 70),
· sectoral and cross-industry social dialogue committees (of which about 70 were active in 2005),
· "komitoloških odborov", ki Komisiji pomagajo na političnih področjih, kjer je pooblaščena za izvajanje zakonodaje (leta 2004 je bilo skupaj 250 odborov),
· "comitology committees" assisting the Commission in policy areas where the Commission is empowered to implement legislation (of which there were a total of 250 in 2004),
· skupnih subjektov, ki izhajajo iz mednarodnih sporazumov (leta 2004 jih je bilo dejavnih 170);
· joint entities arising from international agreements (of which there were a total of 170 active in 2004);
Upravljanje znotraj institucij in njihova letna poročila o delu
Governance within the institutions and their annual activity reports
39. čestita Komisiji za objavo letnih poročil o dejavnostih (za leta 2004, 2005, 2006) svojih generalnih direktorjev in drugih služb ter njenega zbirnega poročila o dosežkih politik leta 2006 ( COM(2007)0067 ) na svoji spletni strani
Congratulates the Commission on the publication of the annual activity reports (2004, 2005, 2006) of its Directors-General and other services and the Synthesis Report of the Commission: Policy achievements in 2006 ( COM(2007)0067 ) on its website
V teh poročilih generalni direktorji in Komisija kot kolegij prevzemajo svojo politično odgovornost za upravljanje, zato izrecno poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme stroge ukrepe za popoln vpogled v porabo 80 % sredstev EU (deljeno upravljanje), saj bo drugače njena odgovornost označena za pomanjkljivo;
Notes that according to the Commission, the Synthesis Report and the annual activity reports are the apex and pillars of the Commission's accountability architecture ( COM(2006)0277 ), and, because the Directors-General and the Commission as a college assume their political responsibility for management in these reports, strongly urges the Commission to take serious measures to give a full insight into how 80% of EU funds are used (shared management), as otherwise its own accountability will be deemed deficient;
Zato poziva Komisijo, naj spodbudi države članice, da izdajo nacionalne izjave o zanesljivosti, kar bi ji omogočilo, da sprejme popolno politično odgovornost za celotno finančno poslovodenje EU; prav tako jo poziva, naj se bolje opre na delo nacionalnih revizijskih služb in zunanjih revizij;
Urges therefore the Commission to support the issuing of National Declarations of Assurance by the Member States which would allow it to assume full political responsibility for the whole of the EU's financial management; also urges the Commission to rely more on the work of national audit offices and external audits;
43. meni, da je treba zaradi večje preglednosti letna poročila o dejavnostih drugih institucij, vključno s Svetom in Evropskim parlamentom, objaviti na njihovih javnih spletnih straneh;
Takes the view that the annual activity reports of the other institutions, including the Council and the European Parliament should be placed on their public websites in the interests of greater transparency;
45. ugotavlja, da službe Komisije tega še vedno niso vključile v zeleno knjigo o pobudi za preglednost v Evropi ali v prihodnjem poročilu, čeprav se v svojem delovnem dokumentu ( KOM(2005)1300 ) podrobno ukvarjajo z uvrščanjem goljufov na črni seznam;
Notes that while the blacklisting of fraudsters is dealt with extensively in the Commission's staff working document ( COM(2005)1300 ), it was not included in either the Commission's Green Paper on the European Transparency Initiative or in the follow-up communication;
49. ugotavlja, da zaradi zaščite podatkov, varovanja legitimnih interesov zadevnih subjektov ter zato, ker v finančni uredbi ni določb o odobritvi objave, so vpisi v sistem zgodnjega obveščanja popolnoma zaupni;
Notes that for reasons of data protection, in order to safeguard the legitimate interests of the entities concerned, and in the absence of any provision in the Financial Regulation authorising publication, EWS registrations are strictly confidential;
52. ugotavlja, da morajo države članice odgovornega odredbodajalca obveščati o izključenih kandidatih in ponudnikih; poleg tega ugotavlja, da javnost ne bo imela dostopa do podatkovnih baz, saj bo ta omejen le na institucije EU ter na izvršilne in regulativne agencije (člen 95(2) finančne uredbe);
Notes that the Member States are required to communicate information concerning excluded candidates and tenderers to the competent authorising officer; notes further that access to the database will not be public, being limited to the EU institutions, executive agencies and regulatory agencies (Article 95(2) of the Financial Regulation);
v zvezi s skupnim stališčem Sveta glede sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi carinskega zakonika Skupnosti (posodobljeni carinski zakonik)
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Community Customs Code (Modernized Customs Code)
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi carinskega zakonika Skupnosti (posodobljeni carinski zakonik)
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Community Customs Code (Modernized Customs Code)
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (11272/6/2007 – C6‑0354/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (11272/6/2007 – C6‑0354/2007 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 12.12.2007, P6_TA(2006)0545 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2005)0608 ),
Texts adopted, 12.12.2006, P6_TA(2006)0545 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0608 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6‑0011/2008 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0011/2008 ),
Kot opozorilo, cilj predloga uredbe v zvezi s posodobljenim carinskim zakonikom je doseči splošno prenovitev carinskega zakonika, prvotno sprejetega leta 1992.
The proposal for a regulation on a modernized customs code is intended to overhaul the entire Customs Code originally adopted in 1992.
Namen predloga, ki zadeva vprašanja, povezana z zahtevami carinskega in trgovskega informatiziranega okolja, s poenostavitvijo carinske ureditve in spremembami nalog, ki jih izvajajo carinski organi, je poenostaviti zakonodajne in upravne postopke tako z vidika carinskih organov kot gospodarskih subjektov.
The proposal, covering matters related to the requirements of an electronic customs and trading environment, to the simplification of customs legislation, and to the changing nature of the tasks performed by customs authorities, aims to simplify legislative and administrative procedures from the point of view of both customs authorities and economic operators.
Evropski parlament je sprejel svoje poročilo v prvi obravnavi 12. decembra 2006.
Parliament adopted its report at first reading on 12 December 2006.
Nemško predsedstvo je uspelo doseči politični sporazum 25. junija lani.
The German Presidency managed to secure a political agreement on 25 June 2007.
Evropski parlament je sprejel 51 predlogov sprememb, vloženih v prvi obravnavi, od katerih je 34, večinoma bistvenih, v celoti ali deloma prevzetih v skupnem stališču Sveta.
Parliament adopted 51 amendments to the proposal at first reading, 34 of which, mostly of a substantive nature, have been taken over fully or in part in the Council common position.
Vaša poročevalka torej namerava ponovno obravnavati sporne točke iz prve obravnave in vam pojasniti, zakaj sprejema skupno stališče Sveta.
Your rapporteur therefore intends to look again at the subjects of disagreement at first reading and explain why she accepts the Council’s common position.
Točke so naslednje:
The points concerned are
· pooblaščeni gospodarski subjekt,
· the status of authorised economic operator,
· pravica zastopanja pri carini,
· entitlement to act as a customs representative,
· centralno carinjenje in
· centralised customs clearance, and
1) Pooblaščeni gospodarski subjekt
1) Authorised economic operators
Ta določba je bila uvedena z uredbo 648/2005, imenovano "predlog spremembe o varnosti", da bi se povečale olajšave subjektom kot nadomestilo za nove obremenitve, nastale zaradi vprašanja varnosti.
The status of authorised economic operator was established by Regulation (EC) No 648/2005, known as the ‘security amendment’: the idea was to offer greater facilities to operators and hence offset the new burdens that they had to shoulder in order to cope with security-related aspects.
Svet je v svojem skupnem stališču prevzel predlog spremembe 16 Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi z dvema različnima vrstama pooblastil ­– "carinske poenostavitve" ter "varnost in varovanje" – rešitev, ki upošteva različne potrebe gospodarskih subjektov.
In its common position the Council has taken over Parliament’s Amendment 16, providing for two distinct types of authorisation, namely ‘customs simplification’ and ‘safety and security’: this solution allows for the different needs of economic operators.
V skladu s predlogom spremembe 17 Evropskega parlamenta je bila odpravljena možnost, ki omogoča prosilcu, da zahteva, da je statut gospodarskega subjekta omejen na eno ali več določenih držav članic.
As called for in Parliament’s Amendment 17, an applicant will not now be able to request that authorised economic operator status be limited to one or more specified Member States.
2) Pravica zastopanja pri carini
2) Entitlement to act as a customs representative
V zvezi z zastopnikom pri carini (člen 11 in uvodna izjava 10) je Svet dosegel zelo zanimiv sporazum.
As regards customs representatives (Article 11 and recital 10), the Council has reached quite an interesting compromise.
Svet ni natančno prevzel predlogov Evropskega parlamenta, vendar se je kljub temu oprl na zamisel o združitvi predstavnika pri carini in pooblaščenega gospodarskega subjekta, kakor smo želeli.
It has not reproduced Parliament’s proposals exactly, but has nonetheless proceeded from the premiss that customs representatives and authorised economic operators should interact along the lines that we were calling for.
V skupnem stališču je zastopanje pri carini obravnavano kot storitev v smislu pogodbe.
In the common position, customs representation is deemed to be a service within the meaning of the Treaty and thus falls under freedom of establishment and the provision of services.
Zastopanje pri carini torej krije svobodo ustanavljanja in opravljanje storitev.
The right of establishment is a matter for Member States.
Pravica do ustanavljanja sodi v pristojnost držav članic, opravljanje storitev v Skupnosti pa temelji na merilih pooblaščenega gospodarskega subjekta, opredeljenih v točkah a) do d) člena 14.
The entitlement to provide services within the Community is based on the criteria governing authorised economic operator status as laid down in Article 14(a) to (d).
3) Centralno carinjenje
3) Centralised customs clearance
Svet je uvedel novi člen 106 ob upoštevanju, da bi bilo zaradi logike in preglednosti bolje vključiti v en člen vse določbe zakonika, povezane s pojmom centralnega carinjenja.
The Council has introduced a new Article 106, taking the view that it is more logical and transparent for all of the provisions of the Code related to the concept of centralised clearance to be encompassed within a single article.
V skladu z novim besedilom so lahko vsi gospodarski subjekti upravičeni do centralnega carinjenja na ozemlju iste države članice, vendar morajo izpolnjevati merila za podelitev statuta pooblaščenega gospodarskega subjekta, da bi lahko bili upravičeni do centralnega carinjenja, kadar je udeleženih več držav članic.
According to the new wording, all economic operators may benefit from centralised clearance on the territory of any one Member State, but they have to satisfy the eligibility criteria for authorised economic operator status in cases involving several Member States.
Svet je podal izjavo glede razporeditve stroškov izterjave carinskih dajatev, DDV in statistik pri centralnem carinjenju.
The Council has issued a statement ‘on the sharing of duty collection, on VAT and on statistics under the centralised clearance system’.
Predviden je tudi korekcijski mehanizem razporeditve stroškov izterjave, ki bi moral upoštevati dejansko udeležbo carinskih in davčnih uprav v carinskih dejavnostih, povezanih z uvozom in izvozom blaga.
Collection costs will thus be apportioned according to an adjustment mechanism so as to allow for the actual involvement of customs and tax administrations in customs operations connected with the import and export of goods.
Ta mehanizem bo torej omogočil, da posodobljeni carinski zakonik ne bo sprejet z zamudo, in preprečil vsako večjo motnjo proračunskega upravljanja držav članic.
This arrangement will consequently prevent delay in the adoption of the Modernised Customs Code and avert serious disruption of any kind to the Member States’ budgetary management.
Poleg tega sta Svet in Evropska komisija podala skupno izjavo, saj obe instituciji soglašata, da je treba oceniti delovanje centralnega carinjenja na koncu obdobja treh let od začetka veljavnosti posodobljenega carinskega zakonika.
The Council and Commission have, in addition, produced a joint statement, as both institutions agree that the operation of the centralised clearance system should be assessed three years after the Modernized Customs Code has entered into force.
Službe Komisije bodo torej Svetu in Parlamentu predložile poročilo, Komisija pa bo po potrebi v skladu s tem oblikovala predloge sprememb zakonodaje.
The Commission will accordingly submit a report to the Council and Parliament and draw up such proposals as might be considered necessary to amend the legislation.
Ena pomembnih točk dokumentacije se je nanašala na regulativni postopek s pregledom, ki bi se moral uporabljati le za 28 določb, vendar je Svet razširil ta postopek na 44 določb, kar torej pomeni večjo udeležbo Evropskega parlamenta.
One of the key issues was the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, which was to have applied to just 28 provisions; the Council, however, has broadened it out to cover 44 provisions, thus increasing the extent of Parliament’s involvement.
Zato vaša poročevalka podpira skupno stališče Sveta in vas poziva, da sprejmete osnutek priporočila brez sprememb.
That is why your rapporteur endorses the Council common position and is asking you to adopt her draft recommendation without amendment.
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0669 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0669 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 137(2) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0394/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 137(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0394/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6‑0137/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0012/2008 ),
Direktiva 2004/40/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtevah v zvezi z izpostavljenostjo delavcev tveganjem, ki nastajajo zaradi fizikalnih dejavnikov(elektromagnetnih sevanj)
Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields)
1. popravek: UL L 184, 24.05.2004, str.
Corrigendum: OJ L 184 of 24.05.2004, p.
1. je osemnajsta posamična direktiva v smislu člena 16(1) okvirne direktive 89/391/EGS.
1. is the eighteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of framework Directive 89/391/EEC.
Direktiva je del paketa štirih direktiv o izpostavljenosti delavcev tveganjem, ki nastajajo zaradi fizikalnih dejavnikov, kot so: hrup, vibracije, elektromagnetna in optična sevanja.
This Directive forms part of a "package" of four directives on the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents: noise, vibration, electromagnetic fields and optical radiation.
V njej so predpisani ukrepi za varovanje delavcev pred tveganji, povezanimi z električnimi, magnetnimi in elektromagnetnimi polji.
It provides for measures to protect workers from the risks related to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields.
Ne obravnava pa dolgoročnih učinkov, tudi rakotvornih ne, ki bi jih lahko povzročila izpostavljenost električnim, magnetnim in elektromagnetnim poljem, in za katere ni prepričljivih znanstvenih podatkov, ki bi dokazovali vzročno zvezo.
However, it does not address the long-term effects, including the carcinogenic effects, that could result from exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields, for which there is no conclusive scientific data establishing a causal link.
Predvideni ukrepi ustvarjajo minimalno osnovo za varstvo vseh delavcev v Uniji, državam članicam pa je prepuščena možnost, da ohranijo ali sprejmejo primernejše določbe.
The measures foreseen create a minimum basis of protection for all workers in the Union, leaving the Member States the option of keeping or adopting more favourable provisions.