natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Računsko sodišče in Evropski parlament imata enake pravice kot Komisija, zlasti pravico do dostopa.
The Court of Auditors and the European Parliament shall enjoy the same rights, especially of access, as the Commission.
Komisija zagotovi izvajanje te uredbe ter v rednih časovnih presledkih poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall report at regular intervals to the European Parliament and the Council.
Komisija opravi vmesni pregled, kakor je določeno v členu 3(3).
It shall carry out a mid-term review , as provided for in Article 3(3).
Komisija zagotovi izvajanje te uredbe ter v rednih časovnih presledkih poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi sredstev in izvedenih dejavnostih.
The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall report at regular intervals to the European Parliament and the Council on the use of funds and the activities carried out .
Komisija opravi vmesno in naknadno vrednotenje , kakor je določeno v členu 3(3), ter o obeh poroča Evropskemu parlamentu .
It shall carry out a mid-term evaluation and an ex-post evaluation , as provided for in Article 3(3) and report on them both to the European Parliament .
Naknadno vrednotenje vsebuje popoln in natančen proračun stroškov za razgradnjo jedrske elektrarne, da se lahko načrtujejo stroški prihodnjih razgradenj.
The ex-post evaluation shall contain a complete and precise budget of the costs for decommissioning a nuclear power plant so as to plan for future decommissioning expenditure.
Analizira tudi ekonomske, socialne in okoljske stroške, pri tem pa se osredotoči na vpliv prostega preostalega sevanja in posledice za zanesljivo dobavo.
It shall also analyse the economic, social and environmental costs, focusing on the impact of residual free-radiation and consequences for security of supply.
Komisija pred podpisom sporazuma o podpori opravi oceno ustreznosti v skladu z mednarodno sprejetimi standardi vsaj za računovodstvo, pregledovanje, notranji nadzor in postopke javnega naročanja Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj (EBOR).
The Commission shall perform a compliance assessment, in line with the internationally accepted standards of, at least, the EBRD accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures, before the signing of the contribution agreement.
Poleg finančne uredbe in pravil o izvajanju lahko Komisija izvaja svoj proračun skupaj z mednarodnimi organizacijami, če te izpolnjujejo merila, s katerimi so njihova zagotovila enakovredna mednarodno sprejetim standardom vsaj na področju računovodstva, pregledovanja, notranjega nadzora in postopki javnih naročil.
Further to the Financial Regulation and Implementing Rules, the Commission is entitled to implement its budget by joint management with international organisations if these organisations apply standards which offer guarantees equivalent to internationally accepted standards, in, at least, their accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures.
S pristopom srednje- in vzhodnoevropskih držav sta postala njihova uporaba jedrske energije in ravnanje z radioaktivnimi odpadki pomembna tudi za Evropsko unijo.
In connection with the accession of Central and Eastern European countries, the use of nuclear power there and the handling of radioactive waste have become matters for consideration in the European Union.
Objektivno nižji standardi varnosti v državah pristopnicah so bili razlog za ukrepanje in finančno podporo za boljše varstvo ljudi in okolja.
The objectively lower safety standards in the accession countries led to pressure being brought to bear, and financial assistance provided, to increase protection of human beings and the environment.
V zvezi z razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn so države pretežno šele po svojem pristopu začele uveljavljati pravne in tehnične predpise za razgradnjo.
As regards the decommissioning of nuclear facilities, it was mostly only after these States had acceded that a start was made there on the introduction of legal and technical rules on decommissioning.
Zmogljivosti za ravnanje z odpadki, ki nastanejo pri razgradnji, so še vedno omejene.
Capacities for handling the waste arising from decommissioning are still only available to a limited extent.
V teh državah prav tako ni nobenih obvezujočih načrtov za ravnanje z bolj dolgoživimi nizko in srednje radioaktivnimi odpadki.
Nor do the countries have any binding plans for dealing with relatively long-lived low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste.
S tem se glavna obremenitev ljudi in okolja, ki izhaja iz ravnanja z najnevarnejšim proizvodom uporabe jedrske energije, prenese v državo, ki ni članica EU.
As a result, the main hazards to human beings and the environment which are involved in handling the most hazardous product of the use of nuclear energy are displaced into a non-EU member state.
Predelava na eni strani pomeni veliko verjetnost nevarnosti (zelo visoke radioaktivne emisije ob normalni uporabi in možnost resnih nesreč), na drugi strani pa se skriva velika nevarnost širjenja in s tem uporabe jedrske energije za vojne namene.
Reprocessing on the one hand entails a very serious potential for safety hazards (very high radioactive emissions during normal operation and possible serious accidents) and on the other hand entails a major danger of proliferation and hence of the use of nuclear energy for belligerent purposes.
Predelava kot način odstranitve izrabljenega goriva ni sprejemljiva.
Reprocessing is not an acceptable method of disposing of irradiated fuel elements.
Zgoraj opisane pomanjkljivosti zadevajo tudi varnostne interese Evropske unije.
The above shortcomings also affect security interests of the European Union.
Zato je v srednje- in vzhodnoevropskih državah zelo zaželen hiter napredek pri odlaganju izrabljenega goriva in visoko radioaktivnih odpadkov.
It is therefore highly desirable that rapid progress should be made on the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
V sporočilu KOM(2009)0581 Komisija predlaga uredbo o zagotovitvi finančne pomoči za razgradnjo enot 1–4 jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj v Bolgariji ter ravnanju z radioaktivnimi snovmi, ki nastanejo pri razgradnji.
The proposal for a regulation submitted by the Commission in COM(2009)0581 is intended to provide financial assistance for the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 at Kozloduy nuclear power plant in Bulgaria and ensure that the resultant radioactive materials are dealt with.
Komisija svoj predlog utemeljuje z dejstvom, da v Republiki Bolgariji zaradi zgodovinskih razlogov niso zagotovili dovolj sredstev za pokritje stroškov razgradnje reaktorjev, pa tudi z obveznostmi v pristopnem aktu glede predčasnega zaprtja reaktorjev 1–4 v Kozloduju.
The Commission justifies its proposal by pointing to the fact that, for historical reasons, insufficient appropriations have been set aside in Bulgaria to cover the costs of dismantling reactors and that commitments were entered into in the Act of Accession in connection with the early closure of Units 1-4 at Kozloduy.
Poročevalka pritrjuje tej utemeljitvi in poudarja, da se morata obe strani držati določb pristopnega akta glede razgradnje reaktorjev 1–4 v Kozloduju.
The rapporteur endorses this justification and stresses that the provisions of the Act of Accession concerning decommissioning of Units 1-4 at Kozloduy must be complied with by both parties.
Brez finančne podpore EU bi po mnenju Komisije lahko prišlo do manjše varnosti na lokaciji in ponovnega začetka obratovanja enot 3 in 4, kar je treba preprečiti.
The possible deterioration of safety at the site and resumed operation of Units 3 and 4, which could result from failure to provide EU financial assistance, must be avoided.
Odločitev za razgradnjo enot 1–4 v Kozloduju temelji na mednarodno priznanem dejstvu, da kaže zasnova reaktorjev vrste WWER 440/230 resne varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ki jih ni mogoče odpraviti učinkovito in z zmernimi stroški.
The basis for the decision to decommission Kozloduy Units 1-4 is the internationally recognised fact that Type WWER 440/230 reactors have serous design faults which affect their safety and cannot be effectively remedied at reasonable cost.
V Kozloduju so z namenom razgradnje zaprli enoti 1 in 2 konec leta 2002, enoti 3 in 4 pa konec leta 2006.
Units 1 and 2 at Kozloduy were closed with a view to decommissioning at the end of 2002 and Units 3 and 4 at the end of 2006.
V obeh enotah, ki sta bili zaprti leta 2002, se lahko razgradnja nadaljuje takoj, brez prekinitve.
In the two units closed in 2002, the decommissioning measures with a view to immediate dismantling can be continued without interruption.
V enotah 3 in 4 so mogoči le omejeni ukrepi za razgradnjo, saj je v njunih skladiščih še vedno izrabljeno gorivo.
In Units 3 and 4, decommissioning measures are only possible to a limited extent, as the storage ponds still contain irradiated fuel elements.
Za večjo varnost objekta in preprečitev morebitnega ponovnega začetka obratovanja obeh enot je treba gorilne elemente čim prej premestiti v zunanje skladišče in takoj začeti z razgradnjo.
In order to improve safety at the plant and prevent the potential restarting of these two units, the fuel elements should be transferred as soon as possible to the external temporary storage facility and dismantling should begin at once.
Iz primerjave stroškov, navedenih za Greifswald, lahko za štiri reaktorje, ob upoštevanju deloma drugačnih pogojev, dobimo znesek 1780 milijonov EUR
The costs stated for Greifswald make it possible to calculate a figure of EUR 1780 m for four reactors, albeit under partially different conditions.
Vlada Republike Bolgarije je za naslednjo fazo razgradnje štirih reaktorjev na začetku zahtevala 202 milijona EUR.
The Government of the Republic of Bulgaria originally called for EUR 202 m to be provided for the next stage of decommissioning of the four reactors.
Financiranje, ki ga predlaga Komisija za razgradnjo v obdobju 2010–2013, znaša 180 milijonov EUR.
The financing proposed by the Commission for the decommissioning between 2010 and 2013 is EUR 180 m.
Mednarodna skupnost (predvsem EU) je do leta 2006 zagotovila 340 milijonov EUR (PHARE), v letih 2007 in 2008 253 milijonov EUR (EBOR) in za leto 2009 89,5 milijona EUR.
The international community (mainly the EU) provided EUR 340 m (PHARE) up to 2006, EUR 253 m (EBRD) from 2007 to 2008 and EUR 89.5 m for 2009.
Če upoštevamo delež, ki ga bo prispevala Bolgarija, lahko znesek 180 milijonov EUR, ki ga je za nadaljnjo razgradnjo predlagala Komisija, štejemo kot primernega.
If a contribution to be made by Bulgaria itself is taken into account, the EUR 180 m proposed by the Commission for the remainder of the decommissioning may be regarded as appropriate.
Zgoraj omenjena zahteva po financiranju v višini 1800 milijonov EUR ne vključuje stroškov projekta odlaganja gorivnih elementov, kakor tudi ne finančna pomoč 300 milijonov EUR, ki jo je predlagala Komisija.
The above-mentioned financing requirement of EUR 1800 m does not include the costs of a project for final disposal of the fuel elements; nor does the financial assistance of EUR 300 m proposed by the Commission.
Sedanja strategija Bolgarije, se pravi predelava zunaj Evropske unije, kot je omenjeno že zgoraj, ni sprejemljiva zaradi pomanjkljive varnosti in zaščite.
As noted above, the strategy of reprocessing outside the European Union which is currently being adhered to in Bulgaria for this purpose is unacceptable on safety and security grounds.
V tretjem poročilu Skupne konvencije sta kot razloga za odločitev za predelavo namesto direktnega odlaganja navedena nezadostna finančna sredstva in preprečevanje nevzdržne obremenitve bodočih generacij.
The third report on the Joint Convention states as grounds for the decision to opt for reprocessing rather than direct final disposal that inadequate funds are available and there is a desire to avoid imposing an unreasonable burden on future generations.
Argument o obremenitvi bodočih generacij ne prepriča.
The argument concerning the burden on future generations does not hold water.
Pri predelavi se ne uniči nobena od snovi, ki nastanejo pri uporabi jedrske energije, torej se ohranja tudi za bodoče generacije.
Reprocessing does not involve destruction of any of the materials created by using nuclear power, which means that they will still be left for future generations to deal with.
EU bi morala zagotoviti manjkajoča sredstva, da bi se predelava kar najhitreje končala.
The funds which are lacking should be provided by the EU in order to ensure that reprocessing is terminated as soon as possible.
Iz proračuna 120 milijonov EUR, ki je na voljo do leta 2013 za upravljanje z izrabljenim gorivom, se bodo financirali ukrepi za pospeševanje razpoložljivosti vseh zmogljivosti skladiščenja in hitro izvedbo postopka za izbiro lokacije za odlagališče, kot tudi ukrepi za preučitev geološke ustreznosti.
Measures to accelerate the availability of the overall temporary storage capacity and to rapidly carry out a procedure to select a final disposal site, as well as measures to survey its geological suitability, should be funded from the budget of EUR 120 m which is being made available for the handling of irradiated fuel elements until 2013.
Predlog Komisije za uredbo o finančni pomoči v okviru Programa Kozloduj vključuje tudi podporo energetskim projektom, kar poročevalka zavrača.
The Commission proposal for a regulation on financial assistance to the 'Kozloduy Programme' also provides for the promotion of energy projects.
Po podatkih Komisije gre predvsem za podpiranje večje energetske učinkovitosti in uporabe obnovljivih virov energije.
According to Commission figures, this funding was mainly used to improve energy efficiency and promote the use of renewable energy.
KOM(2009)0581 končno To je Bolgariji omogočilo, da je zmanjšala emisije CO 2 pri proizvodnji električne energije, ki je bila na splošno bolj prijazna okolju.
2 This enabled Bulgaria to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from its power plants and more generally to improve their environmental performance.
Bolgarija pa se je na drugi strani odločila, da bo svoje zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo električne energije širila s pomočjo jedrske energije.
Yet Bulgaria has for its part decided to expand its generating capacity by using nuclear power.
To bi lahko sicer ob hkratnem prenehanju uporabe premoga v omejenem obsegu zmanjšalo emisije CO 2 , vendar bi pomenilo večjo obremenitev ljudi in okolja z radioaktivnostjo kot tudi večje tveganje zaradi možnosti motenj.
Although this could reduce carbon dioxide emissions to a small extent if the country simultaneously refrained from using coal, it means increased exposure of people and the environment to radioactivity and increased safety risks because of the possibility of incidents occurring.
Ker pa vsak euro, vložen v energetsko učinkovitost, precej hitreje in večkratno zmanjša emisije toplogrednih plinov, kot pa euro, vložen v izgradnjo jedrske energije, vztrajanje pri jedrski energiji dejansko vodi k višjim emisijam kot druge strategije.
As, however, each euro invested in energy efficiency far more quickly reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and by many times more, than each euro invested in expanding nuclear power, the insistence on clinging to a nuclear strategy de facto leads to higher emissions than other strategies.
Enoti 1 in 2 sta bili zaprti pred osmimi leti, enoti 3 in 4 pred več kot tremi leti, zgolj 5 let pred predvidenim koncem obratovanja.
Units 1 and 2 were closed fully eight years ago, and Units 3 and 4 more than three years ago, only five years before the end of their design life.
Za načrtovanje in izgradnjo nadomestnih zmogljivosti je bilo torej dovolj časa, zaradi finančne podpore EBOR pa tudi dovolj možnosti.
Thus sufficient time was available in which to plan and build replacement capacity, and thanks to the financial assistance from the EBRD, funding was also available for the purpose.
V Bolgariji po letu 2007 (po zaprtju enot 1–4 jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj) ni bilo težav s preskrbo z električno energijo.
Electricity continued to be supplied in Bulgaria after 2007 (after Units 1-4 of Kozloduy nuclear power plant had been closed) without any problem 3 .
ENTSOE 2009 Nadomestitev proizvodnih zmogljivosti za ohranjanje zanesljivosti preskrbe z energijo v Bolgariji torej ni potrebna.
There is therefore no need to replace production capacity in order to maintain security of supply in Bulgaria.
Če naj se termin „regija“ v predlogu Komisije nanaša tudi na območja zunaj Bolgarije, bi bilo treba najprej preučiti preskrbo teh držav z energijo.
If the term 'region' in the Commission proposal also applies to areas outside Bulgaria, it would initially be necessary to examine the supply of these countries.
Ker sosednje države z izjemo Romunije in Grčije niso članice EU, bi bilo treba tudi preveriti, koliko se sme na ta način podpirati njihovo preskrbo s sredstvi EU.
As the neighbouring countries - with the exception of Romania and Greece - are not EU Member States, it would also be necessary to check the extent to which it is permissible to assist their energy supplies with EU funding in this way.
Poleg tega prejemajo bolgarski upravljavci obratov za preskrbo z električno energijo prihodke iz izvoza.
Moreover, Bulgarian electricity generators derive revenue from exports.
Ta izvoz se ne sme financirati s sredstvi EU.
These exports must not be paid for using EU funds.
Ob upoštevanju zagotovitve 120 milijonov EUR za nadaljnje upravljanje z izrabljenim gorivom se zdi predlog Komisije v zvezi z razgradnjo ustrezen.
Taking into account the provision of EUR 120 m for the further processing of irradiated fuel elements, the text proposed by the Commission regarding decommissioning seems appropriate:
Nadaljevanje podpore iz proračuna EU ustreza interesom EU glede varnosti uporabe jedrske energije.
The continued funding from the EU budget accords with the EU's interest in maintaining safety of nuclear power use.
Dodelitev podpornih sredstev prek EBOR je ustrezna.
The allocation of the funds via the EBRD is appropriate.
Brez te podpore ni mogoče izključiti ponovnega začetka obratovanja reaktorjev 3 in 4 v Kozloduju, kar bi pomenilo veliko nevarnost motenj.
Without this support, it is not impossible that Reactors 3 and 4 at Kozloduy might be restarted, which would entail substantial risks of incidents.
Težje motnje ne bi prizadele le Republike Bolgarije.
Serious incidents would not only affect the Republic of Bulgaria.
Republika Bolgarija do sedaj ni zagotovila zadostnih sredstev za razgradnjo.
So far, no adequate reserves exist in the Republic of Bulgaria to pay for decommissioning.
Brez sredstev EU najbrž ni nobenega zagotovila, da se bodo ukrepi razgradnje za varstvo ljudi in okolja nadaljevali v potrebnem obsegu.
Without EU funding there is probably no guarantee that the decommissioning measures to protect human beings and the environment will continue to the requisite extent.
Ker zaenkrat ni dovolj finančnih sredstev, sredstva EU prispevajo k temu, da se pri ukrepih za razgradnjo dosega visoka raven varnosti za varstvo ljudi in okolja.
Because of the current lack of funding, the EU funds will help to ensure that a high standard of safety is attained in the decommissioning work in order to protect human beings and the environment.
Uporabo sredstev EU je treba omejiti na razgradnjo reaktorjev 1–4 v Kozloduju in pri tem na točno določene projekte, kot tudi na hitro izgradnjo suhega skladišča in odlagališča gorilnih elementov.
The use of EU funds must be confined to the decommissioning of Kozloduy Units 1 to 4 and, in that context, to the projects for which it is earmarked, as well as for the rapid organisation of temporary dry storage and final disposal of the fuel elements.
Spremembe in prilagoditve uvodnih izjav in členov natančneje določajo uporabo zagotovljenih sredstev in jih vežejo na prednostne cilje EU, ki so ohranitev visokih standardov varnosti pri razgradnji in uvedbi liberaliziranega trga z energijo prek preprečevanja dolgoročnejših izkrivljanj konkurence.
The proposed amendments/additions to the recitals and articles define more precisely the use to be made of the funding and link it to the priority objectives of the EU: upholding high safety standards in the decommissioning and creation of the liberalised energy market by avoiding longer-term distortions of competition.
Člen 6 uredbe naj bi omogočil učinkovit nadzor nad uporabo sredstev EU in nad časovno primernostjo te uporabe.
Article 6 of the regulation is intended to facilitate effective monitoring of the use made of the EU funds and of whether they are used at the right time.
Tu pride prav obveščenost o aktualnem stanju postopka za izdajo dovoljenj.
For this purpose, a knowledge of the current state of the permit procedure is helpful.
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o finančni pomoči Skupnosti v zvezi z razgradnjo enot 1 do 4 jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj v Bolgariji „Program Kozloduj”
on the proposal for a Council regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria -'Kozloduy programme'
Litva, Slovaška in Bolgarija prejemajo finančno pomoč Skupnosti, ki pomeni podporo prizadevanjem teh držav pri uveljavljanju njihove zaveze za zaprtje prve generacije jedrskih reaktorjev.
Financial Community assistance is provided to Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria to support the efforts in implementing their commitment of closing down first generation nuclear reactors.
Pomoč Bolgariji ureja pristopna pogodba in naj bi se končala leta 2009, pomoč Litvi in Slovaški pa se bo nadaljevala do leta 2013.
The support to Bulgaria has been governed by the Accession Treaty and it has been due to end in 2009, while support to Lithuania and Slovakia will continue until 2013.
Finančna pomoč, dodeljena do leta 2009, je bila namenjena predvsem pripravam na razgradnjo.
The financial support provided until 2009 for decommissioning was mainly dedicated to preparation works.
Predlaga se podaljšanje podpore Bolgariji za spremljanje in zagotavljanje varnega vzdrževanja in razgradnje jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj v skladu s sprejetim načrtom.
The proposal for the continuation is to extend the support to Bulgaria to accompany and to ascertain the safe maintenance and decommissioning of the Kozloduy power plant according to an approved plan.
Predlog tudi vsebuje nadaljnje blažilne ukrepe na energetskem področju.
The proposal also provides for further mitigation measures in the energy sector.
Potreben finančni prispevek Skupnosti bo skupaj 300 milijonov EUR v letih 2010–2013.
The financial contribution required from the Community will be EUR 300 million in total in 2010-2013.
Pomoč bo na razpolago kot prispevek Skupnosti Mednarodnemu podpornemu skladu za razgradnjo jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj, ki ga upravlja Evropska banka za obnovo in razvoj.
The assistance will be made available as a Community contribution to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support fund managed by the EBRD.
Komisija je svoj predlog za nadaljevanje pomoči za razgradnjo jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj predstavila oktobra 2009, v času proračunskega postopka za leto 2010.
The Commission presented its proposal for the continuation of support for the decommissioning of Kozloduy in October 2009, in the middle of the budget procedure for 2010.
Proračunski predlog za leto 2010 je bil vključen v pisni predlog spremembe predhodnega proračuna 2.
The budgetary proposal concerning the year 2010 was included in Amending Letter 2.
Ker je predlog prispel zelo pozno, je proračunski organ postavil pred velik izziv, saj bi morale proračunske zahteve za razgradnjo jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj spadati v razdelek 1a, tako kot evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva, za katerega sta bili leta 2010 potrebni skoraj 2 milijardi EUR.
Arriving very late, the proposal placed the budgetary authority before a considerable challenge, since the budgetary needs of the decommissioning of Kozloduy were due to fall under Heading 1a, just like the European Recovery Plan, which required financing for almost 2 billion euro in 2010.