natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· Podrobno so določeni vsebina, oblika in čas, v katerem je treba prosilcem za mednarodno zaščito priskrbeti informacije, vključno s sprejetjem skupne informativne brošure.
· Detailed specification of the content, form and timing for providing information to applicants for international protection, including the adoption of a common information leaflet;
· Pravica do pritožbe zoper odločitev o predaji, vključno s pravico do pravne pomoči/zastopanja, skupaj z obveznostjo pristojnih organov, da se odločijo, ali bi bilo treba njeno izvršitev odložiti ali ne, ter pravica zadevne osebe, da ostane na ozemlju med obravnavo njene pritožbe.
· Right to appeal against a transfer decision, including the right to legal assistance/representation along with the obligation of competent authorities to decide whether or not the transfer should be suspended and the right of the person concerned to remain on the territory pending such a decision;
· Vključena je nova določba, ki opozarja na načelo, da oseb ni dovoljeno pridržati zgolj zato, ker zaprosijo za mednarodno zaščito.
· Inclusion of a provision recalling the principle that a person should not be held in detention for the sole reason that he/she is seeking international protection;
· Pojasnjenih je več določb za zagotovitev spoštovanja načela učinkovitega dostopa do azilnega postopka.
· Clarification of several provisions in order to guarantee respect for the principle of effective access to the asylum procedure;
· Razširjena je pravica do ponovne združitve družine na družinske člane, ki so deležni subsidiarne zaščite in ki bivajo v drugi državi članici
· Extension of the right to family reunification to include family members who are beneficiaries of subsidiary protection and who reside in another Member State (s
(glej 2.1).
ee 2.1. );
· Obvezna je ponovna združitev nepreskrbljenih sorodnikov.
· Reunification of dependent relatives is made compulsory;
Zaščita, ki so je deležni mladoletniki brez spremstva, je razširjena tako, da se med drugim dovoli ponovna združitev ne le z ožjimi družinskimi člani, temveč tudi z drugimi sorodniki, ki so prisotni v drugi državi članici.
· Enlargement of the protection afforded to unaccompanied minors by, inter alia, allowing reunification not only with the nuclear family but also with other relatives present in another Member State;
· Dodana je nova določba, ki obravnava jamstva za mladoletnike.
· Introduction of a new provision dealing with guarantees for minors;
· Razširjena je opredelitev „družinskih članov“ v zvezi z mladoletniki, da bi zagotovili boljše varstvo „največje koristi otroka“.
· Extension of the definition of 'family members' as far as minors are concerned, in order to ensure better protection of the 'best interests of the child';
· V določenih primerih je izključena možnost vrnitve prosilca, za katerega se lahko uporabi eno izmed meril enotnosti družine.
· Exclusion, under certain circumstances, of the possibility of sending back an applicant for whom one of the family unity criteria can apply;
· Zaradi jasnosti sta v poglavju „diskrecijska klavzula“ združeni določba „o prenosu suverenosti“ in „humanitarna“ določba.
· For reasons of clarity, the 'sovereignty' and the 'humanitarian' clauses are brought together under the same Chapter, called 'discretionary clauses';
· Ohranjena je obveznost pridobitve soglasja prosilca, da bi se izognili uporabi določbe „o prenosu suverenosti“ proti prosilcu.
· Obligation to obtain the consent of the applicant is retained in order to avoid that the 'sovereignty clause' works against the applicant;
Reševanje primerov, ko se države članice srečujejo s posebnim pritiskom na svoje sprejemne zmogljivosti in azilne sisteme, ter primerov, ko prosilci za mednarodno zaščito niso deležni ustrezne ravni zaščite
Addressing situations of particular pressure on Member States' reception capacity facilities and asylum systems, as well as situations where there is an inadequate level of protection for applicants for international protection
Zdajšnji dublinski sistem ne predvideva mehanizma, ki bi v primerih, ko se pod posebnim pritiskom znajde država članica z omejenimi sprejemnimi in absorpcijskimi zmogljivostmi, omogočal odložitev predaj na podlagi dublinske uredbe, če bi tovrstne predaje za to državo članico pomenile dodatno breme.
The current Dublin system does not foresee a mechanism that would, in cases of particular pressure on a Member State with limited reception and absorption capacities, allow for the suspension of Dublin transfers if these Dublin transfers would add to the burden on that Member State.
To velja tudi v primerih, ko obstaja skrb, da bi imele predaje na podlagi dublinske uredbe za posledico neustrezne standarde zaščite za prosilce v odgovorni državi članici, zlasti glede pogojev za sprejem in dostopa do azilnega postopka.
The same goes for cases where there are concerns that Dublin transfers could result in applicants not benefiting from adequate standards of protection in the responsible Member State, in particular in terms of reception conditions and access to the asylum procedure.
Zelo je na primer zaskrbljena zaradi razlik v sklepih za sprejem ali zavrnitev prošenj za azil, ki jih vlagajo prosilci iz iste države izvora.
In fact, she is (for example) seriously concerned about the differences in decisions to recognise or reject asylum requests from applicants from the same countries of origin.
Kot je zapisala Komisija v Načrtu politike azila
As observed by the Commission in the Policy Plan on Asylum
Končni cilj na ravni EU je vzpostavitev enakih konkurenčnih pogojev in sistema, ki osebam, ki res potrebujejo zaščito, zagotavlja dostop do visoke ravni zaščite pod enakovrednimi pogoji v vseh državah članicah, obenem pa pravično in učinkovito obravnava tiste, za katere se ugotovi, da ne potrebujejo zaščite.
The ultimate objective pursued at EU level is to establish a level playing field and a system, which guarantees that persons genuinely in need of protection have access to a high level of protection under equivalent conditions in all Member States, while, at the same time, dealing fairly and efficiently with those found not to be in need of protection.
Kot je Komisija poudarila v svojem sporočilu o krepitvi sodelovanja v praksi
As highlighted in the Commission's Communication on strengthened practical cooperation
Tako je partnerstvo in sodelovanje odločilnega pomena pri obvladovanju dotoka oseb, ki prosijo za azil ali subsidiarno ali začasno zaščito.
Partnership and cooperation for the purpose of managing inflows of people applying for asylum or subsidiary/temporary protection is therefore crucial.
Čeprav poročevalka načeloma podpira določbe o „začasni odložitvi predaje“ (člen 31), mora biti jasno, da ni bil dublinski sistem nikoli mišljen kot instrument za porazdelitev bremena.
Although your rapporteur supports the provisions on the 'temporary suspension of transfers' (Article 31) as a matter of principle, it must be clear that the Dublin system was never devised as a burden sharing instrument.
Poleg tega bi rada poudarila, da dublinski sistem sam po sebi ni vir posebnega azilnega pritiska ali čezmerne obremenitve držav članic, kot je zapisano tudi v oceni učinkov
In addition, she would like to stress the fact that the Dublin system in itself, as spelled out in the Impact assessment
Zatorej se boji, da se bodo te določbe izkazale za politično izjavo, ne pa za uspešen instrument za izboljšanje standardov in/ali za resno podporo držav članic, ki se v posebej nujnih razmerah srečujejo z izjemno težkim pritiskom na svoje sprejemne zmogljivosti, azilni sistem ali infrastrukturo.
She therefore fears that these provisions will turn out to be a political statement rather than an effective instrument to improve standards and/or to seriously support a Member State that faces a particularly urgent situation which places an exceptionally heavy burden on its reception capacities, asylum system or infrastructure.
V Načrtu politike azila je Komisija zapisala, da „se visoka raven solidarnosti ne bo najbolje zagotovila s sprejetjem novega poglavitnega instrumenta, temveč tako, da se državam članicam dajo na razpolago številni mehanizmi, ki jim bodo pomagali obvladovati različne izzive, s katerimi se srečujejo“
In its Policy Plan on Asylum the Commission stated that 'the best way to ensure a high degree of solidarity is not to adopt a new overarching instrument, but to put at the disposal of Member States a series of mechanisms, which will help them cope with the variety of challenges they are faced with'
Poročevalka se strinja, vendar le do neke mere.
Your rapporteur agrees, but just to a certain extent.
Meni namreč, da se je v zadnjih letih pokazalo, da obstoječe oblike praktičnega sodelovanja med državami članicami (da bi uskladile svojo interpretacijo načela solidarnosti in poštene delitve odgovornosti) nikakor ne zadostujejo za izboljšanje standardov in/ali reševanje problemov, s katerimi se številne države članice spopadajo zaradi npr. geografske lege in/ali demografskih razmer.
She is of the opinion that the past years have shown that the existing forms of practical cooperation among Member States (in order to align their interpretation of the principle of 'solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility') are not in any way sufficient to improve standards and/or to address the problems that a number of Member States are facing because of, for example, their geographical position and/or demographic situation.
2. uvedba sistema prerazporeditve, ki bi osebam, deležnim mednarodne zaščite, omogočil sprejem v drugi državi članici in ne v državi, ki jim je to zaščito odobrila.
Setting up a reallocation scheme to enable beneficiaries of international protection to be received by a Member State other than the country which has granted them the benefit of that protection.
Poleg tega od Komisije zahteva, da uporabi vse možnosti, ki jih ima na voljo za sprožitev postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, če se bo neupoštevanje prava Skupnosti nadaljevalo (zlasti glede dostopa do azilnega postopka in ustreznih pogojev za sprejem).
In addition the Commission is requested to make full use of its possibilities to start up infringement procedures if non-compliance with community law persists (in particular with regard to access to the asylum procedure and adequate reception conditions).
Poročevalka seveda meni, da solidarnost ne more biti omejena le na dodelitev finančnih sredstev.
Clearly, your rapporteur is of the opinion that solidarity cannot be confined to the granting of financial resources only.
Vendar nedvomno pozdravlja namen Komisije, da v letu 2009 začne študijo, da bi proučila možne metode izboljšanja vpliva finančne solidarnosti EU, vključno z Evropskim skladom za begunce, ter ocenila, ali obstoječi finančni instrumenti učinkovito pomagajo državam članicam pri obvladovanju močnih nezakonitih migracijskih pritiskov.
However, she does (of course!) welcome the Commission's intention to launch a study in the course of 2009 to evaluate possible methods of improving the impact of EU financial solidarity (including the European Refugee Fund) and to assess whether the existing financial instruments provide effective support to the challenges Member States face in addressing strong irregular migratory pressures.
Nekaj opomb
Some remarks
S političnega zornega kota je očitno, da je državam članicam težko uspešno uskladiti standarde kakovosti in deliti odgovornost.
From a political point of view it is apparent that Member States find it difficult to effectively harmonise quality standards as well as to share responsibility.
Do sedaj dogovorjeni standardi se precej razlikujejo od visokih ambicij, ki so bile prvič izražene leta 1999.
Standards agreed upon so far are in great contrast with the high ambitions as first expressed in 1999.
S tega vidika je jasno, da zaželena uskladitev ni uspela.
In this respect the desired harmonisation clearly failed.
Poleg tega so uspešno usklajeni pogoji za sprejem bistveni, če se želimo izogniti sekundarnemu gibanju.
Furthermore, if secondary movements are to be avoided, effective harmonised reception conditions are of utmost importance.
Najkljub direktivi o pogojih sprejema tudi tu precejšnje razlike preprečujejo želeni učinek uskladitve.
However, despite the Reception Conditions Directive, here also the wide margins result in negating the desired harmonisation effect.
Žal isto velja za merila o izpolnjevanju pogojev za dodelitev statusa zaščite.
Unfortunately the same applies to the eligibility criteria for granting a protection status.
Tako je bistvenega pomena, da izboljšamo pogoje, v katerih lahko osebe, ki prosijo za zaščito v EU, uspešno predstavijo svoje zahteve in dosežejo njihovo izpolnitev, da povečamo zmogljivosti vseh zainteresiranih strani za izboljšanje splošne kakovosti, in da nacionalne azilne organe opremimo z ustreznimi orodji za uspešno upravljanje azilnih tokov in hkratno preprečevanje prevar in zlorab.
It is therefore essential to improve the conditions under which persons seeking protection in the EU can effectively present and pursue their claims, to boost the capacity of all stakeholders involved in order to improve the overall quality and to provide national asylum administrations with adequate tools enabling them to efficiently manage asylum flows and at the same time prevent fraud and abuse.
Dejstvo, da boljša kakovost skupaj z večjo doslednostjo in solidarnostjo ne koristi le prosilcem za azil, temveč tudi državam članicam samim, očitno (še?) ni jasno.
The fact that improving quality, in combination with more consistency and solidarity, is not only in the interest of the asylum seekers but also in the interest of the Member States themselves does not (yet?) seem to get through.
Boljša kakovost sprejemanja odločitev bo zmanjšala število izpodbijanj zavrnitev, kar bo privedlo do precejšnjih prihrankov pri stroških in času.
Better quality decision-making, however, will reduce the number of challenges to negative decisions resulting in vast cost and time savings.
Poleg tega je pri praksi držav članic potrebna večja usklajenost, če želimo uspešno rešiti sekundarno gibanje v EU.
Furthermore, greater coherence in Member States’ practices is necessary in order to effectively address secondary movement within the EU.
Veliko državam članicam je kljub vsem obljubam in sporazumom neznansko težko izpolniti svoje obljube.
Despite all promises and agreements many Member States have enormous difficulties with living up to their promises.
Niti prenos zdajšnjih štirih glavnih pravnih instrumentov v nacionalno pravo ni potekal gladko v smislu časovne usklajenosti in natančnosti, tolmačenja pravnih instrumentov pa se med državami članicami precej razlikujejo.
Even the transposition of the current four main legal instruments into national law did not go smoothly in terms of timing and accuracy and the interpretations of the legal instruments differ significantly between the Member States.
Daleč od sprejemanja evropske perspektive – države članice zaradi politične občutljivosti azila in preseljevanja ostajajo pri nacionalnih politikah odvračanja in preusmerjanja.
Far from taking a European perspective, the political sensitivities around asylum and migration are such that Member States remain wedded to national policies of deterrence and deflection.
Boljši in bolj usklajen standard zaščite, dosežen z nadaljnjim prilagajanjem in uveljavljanjem zakonov držav članic, je prava (v bistvu edina) pot naprej.
A better and more harmonised standard of protection through further alignment , as well as enforcement, of Member States' laws is the right (in fact: the only) way forward.
Za dosego tega cilja Komisija ni predlagala le prenovitve dublinske uredbe, temveč tudi prenovitev direktive o pogojih sprejema in uredbe Eurodac.
In order to achieve this aim the Commission has not only proposed the recast of the Dublin Regulation, but also the recast of the Reception Conditions Directive as well as the EURODAC Regulation.
Komisija bo predloge za spremembe direktive o pogojih (2004/83/ES) in direktive o azilnih postopkih (2005/85/ES) pripravila v letu 2009.
The Commission's proposals amending the Qualification Directive (2004/83/EC) and the Asylum Procedures Directive (2005/85/EC) will be submitted in 2009.
Prav tako bo Komisija predlagala ustanovitev evropskega urada za podporo azilu, ki bo zagotavljal praktično pomoč državam članicam pri sprejemanju odločitev o prošnjah za azil.
In addition, the Commission will propose the establishment of a European Asylum Support Office (providing practical assistance to Member States in taking decisions on asylum claims).
Končno želi poročevalka izraziti še pomislek glede vrstnega reda predložitve zgoraj omenjenih predlogov Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu.
As a final remark your rapporteur wishes to express some concerns on the order of the above-mentioned Commission's proposals being submitted to Parliament and Council.
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, zlasti s točko 9 tega sporazuma, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 21. januarja 2009, da bi med drugim proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 21 January 2009 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Na tem sestanku
At that meeting
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna jezikovna različica obravnavanega besedila. je posvetovalna delovna skupina po preučitvi predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenovitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003 z dne 18. februarja 2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države, soglasno zaključila, kot sledi.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
1) 1) V členu 11(1) se pojavi besedilo „prisotnega v drugi državi članici“/„prisoten v drugi državi članici“ (ki je prečrtano z dvojno črto in osenčeno s sivo).
1) In Article 11(1), the wording " present in another Member State " (identified with double strikethrough and grey shaded type) occurs twice.
To besedilo, ki ga v obstoječem besedilu člena 15(2) Uredbe (ES) št 343/2003 ni, ne bi smelo biti vključeno v predlagano besedilo člena 11(1).
That wording, which does not appear in the existing text of Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 343/2003, should not have been introduced into the proposed text for Article 11(1).
2) V tretjem pododstavku člena 17(2) začetno besedilo „Država članica, na katero je zahteva naslovljena,“, ki je že vključeno v obstoječe besedilo člena 13(3) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1560/2003, ne bi smelo biti predstavljeno med puščicama, ki označujeta spremembo.
2) In Article 17(2), third subparagraph, the initial words " The requested Member State shall carry out ", which are already present in the existing text of Article 13(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003, should not have been presented between adaptation arrows.
3) V črtanem delu besedila, ki stoji med členoma 24 in 25, besedilo člena 20(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 343/2003 („Pravila za dokaze in posredne okoliščine in njihovo tolmačenje ter za pripravo zahtev in postopki za njihov prenos se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 27(2)“) ne bi smelo biti osenčeno s sivo.
3) In the deleted part of text appearing between Article 24 and Article 25, the wording of Article 20(3) of Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 (" The rules of proof and evidence and their interpretation, and on the preparation of and the procedures for transmitting requests, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 27(2) ") should have been presented without grey shaded type.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers (recast)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0815 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0815 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 63(1)(b) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0477/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 63(1)(b) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0477/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za pravne zadeve z dne 25. februarja 2009, naslovljenega na Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve v skladu z odstavkom 3 člena 80a poslovnika,
– having regard to the letter of 25 February 2009 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs in accordance with Rule 80a(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0285/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0285/2009 ),
(11) Ob upoštevanju ravni socialne pomoči, ki je na voljo državljanom v državi članici gostiteljici, je treba določiti minimalne standarde za sprejem prosilcev za azil, ki zadoščajo, da se jim zagotovi dostojen življenjski standard in primerljivi življenjski pogoji v vseh državah članicah.
(11) Minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers that will suffice to ensure them a dignified standard of living and comparable living conditions in all Member States taking into consideration the level of social assistance available for nationals in the hosting Member State, should be laid down.
(11) Treba je določiti minimalne standarde za sprejem prosilcev za azil, ki načeloma zadoščajo, da se jim zagotovi dostojen življenjski standard in primerljivi življenjski pogoji v vseh državah članicah.
(11) Minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers that will normally suffice to ensure them a dignified standard of living and comparable living conditions in all Member States should be laid down.
(16) Pridržanje prosilcev za azil bi bilo treba uporabljati v skladu z osnovnim načelom, da se osebe ne sme pridržati samo zato, ker je zaprosila za mednarodno zaščito, zlasti v skladu s členom 31 Ženevske konvencije o statusu beguncev z dne 28. julija 1951.
(16) Detention of asylum seekers should be applied in line with the underlying principle that a person should not be held in detention for the sole reason that he/she is seeking international protection, notably in accordance with Article 31 of the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951.
Države članice prosilcem za azil zlasti ne bi smele nalagati kazni zaradi nezakonitega vstopa ali prisotnosti in kakršnih koli omejitev gibanja, ki niso potrebne.
In particular Member States should not impose penalties on asylum seekers on account of illegal entry or presence and any restrictions to movement should be necessary.