natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju poročila Evropskega centra za upravljanje razvojne politike (ECDPM) z naslovom „Mehanizmi institucij Evropske unije in držav članic za spodbujanje usklajenosti politik za razvoj: končno poročilo“,
– having regard to the 2007 report by the ECDPM entitled ‘The EU institutions & Member States’ mechanisms for promoting policy coherence for development: final report’,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj in mnenja Odbora za mednarodno trgovino (A7 0140/2010),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade ( A7‑0140/2010 ),
A. ker je OECD predlagal, da se opredeli koncept usklajenosti politik za razvoj, kar pomeni „prizadevanje, da druge politike vlade, ki imajo posledice za države v razvoju, ne škodijo ciljem in rezultatom razvojnih politik iste vlade in da te druge politike podpirajo razvojne cilje, kjer je to mogoče“
A. whereas the OECD has proposed defining the concept of policy coherence for development (PCD), which means ‘working to ensure that the objectives and results of a government’s development policies are not undermined by other policies of that government, which impact on developing countries, and that these other policies support development objectives, where feasible’
„Usklajenost politik za razvoj: institucionalni pristopi: tehnična delavnica“: Delavnica OECD, ki je potekala 13. oktobra 2003 v Parizu. ,; ker je Evropska unija izdelala koncept usklajenosti razvojnih politik za okrepitev sinergij med politikami Unije in ker odsotnost političnega delovanja lahko negativno vpliva na pričakovane rezultate razvojnega sodelovanja,
‘Policy Coherence for Development: Institutional Approaches: Technical Workshop’: OECD workshop held in Paris on 13 October 2003. ; whereas the EU has developed a concept of PCD aimed at building synergies between EU policies, and whereas lack of political action to this end may have a negative impact on the expected result of development cooperation,
B. ker se je Evropska unija zavezala, da bo sprejela ukrepe za spodbujanje usklajenosti razvojnih politik skladno s sklepi Evropskega sveta iz leta 2005
B. recalling the European Union’s commitment to taking measures to encourage policy coherence for development, in accordance with the conclusions of the European Council in 2005
Člen 35 skupne izjave Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki se sestajajo znotraj Sveta, ter Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije o razvojni politiki Evropske unije: „Evropsko soglasje“ (2006/C 46/01). ,
Article 35 of the Joint statement by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European Union Development Policy: ‘The European Consensus’ (2006/C 46/01). ,
C. ker obstaja razlika med usklajenostjo politik (izogibanje navzkrižjem med različnimi področji zunanje politike) in usklajenostjo politik za razvoj (obveznost, da vse politike EU, ki vplivajo na države v razvoju, upoštevajo razvojne cilje);
C. whereas there is a difference between consistency among policies (avoiding contradictions among different external policy areas) and coherence for development (the obligation for all EU policies that impact on developing countries to take development objectives into account);
D. ker člen 208 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije opredeljuje zmanjševanje in v končni fazi izkoreninjenje revščine kot poglavitni cilj razvojne politike EU; ker se z usklajenostjo politik za razvoj z vsemi politikami EU želijo doseči cilji razvojnega sodelovanja Unije,
D. whereas Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union establishes the reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty as the primary objective of EU development policy; whereas PCD works towards the Union’s development cooperation objectives though all its policies,
E. ker obstaja očitna neskladnost v politikah EU na področju trgovine, kmetijstva, ribištva, podnebja, pravic intelektualne lastnine, migracij, financ, orožja in surovin; in ker lahko usklajenost politik za razvoj z vzpostavljanjem temeljnih sinergij med politikami EU omogoči zmanjšanje revščine,
E. whereas there are clear incoherencies in the EU’s trade, agriculture, fisheries, climate, intellectual property rights, migration, finance, arms and raw materials policies; and whereas PCD can lead to poverty reduction by finding fundamental synergies among EU Policies,
F. ker usklajenost politik za razvoj ovirajo pomanjkanje politične volje, nezadostna sredstva, odsotnost tako učinkovitih orodij in kazalnikov za spremljanje kot tudi odsotnost dajanja prednosti usklajenosti politik za razvoj pred navzkrižnimi interesi,
F. whereas constraints for PCD are lack of political support, unclear mandates, insufficient resources, absence of effective monitoring tools and indicators, as well as the lack of prioritisation of PCD over conflicting interests,
G. ker finančna nadomestila, ki jih EU izplačuje v okviru partnerskega sporazuma o ribištvu, niso prispevala k utrditvi ribiških politik v partnerskih državah, kar je v veliki meri posledica nespremljanja izvajanja sporazumov, počasnosti pri zagotavljanju pomoči in včasih celo neuporabe teh sredstev,
G. whereas the financial contributions paid by the EU within the framework of Fisheries Partnership Agreements (FPAs) have not helped to consolidate the fisheries policies of partner countries, largely owing to a lack of monitoring of the implementation of these agreements, the slow payment of assistance, and sometimes even the failure to use this assistance,
H. ker je prvi razvojni cilj tisočletja do leta 2015 za polovico zmanjšati število oseb, ki trpijo za lakoto, vendar vsak dan skoraj milijarda ljudi še vedno živi v pomanjkanju hrane, čeprav je na svetu proizvedemo dovolj, da bi lahko zadostili potrebam vsega prebivalstva,
H. whereas the first Millennium Development Goal aims to reduce by half the proportion of people who suffer from hunger by 2015, yet whereas nearly a billion people still lack food on a daily basis, even though the planet provides enough food to meet the needs of its entire population,
I. ker izvozne subvencije Evropske unije za evropske kmetijske izdelke zelo škodijo varnosti preskrbe s hrano in razvoju vzdržljivega kmetijskega sektorja v državah v razvoju,
I. whereas EU export subsidies for European agricultural products have a disastrous effect on food security and the development of a viable agricultural sector in developing countries,
J. ker se je EU zavezala, da bo do leta 2015 dosegla cilj ZN in za uradno razvojno pomoč namenila 0,7 % bruto nacionalnega dohodka (BND) in da je začasni cilj glede pomoči EU 0,56 % do leta 2010,
J. whereas the EU is committed to reaching the UN target of giving 0.7% of gross national income (GNI) in official development assistance (ODA) by 2015, and the interim aid target for the EU collectively is 0.56% by 2010,
K. ker je Sodišče Evropske unije novembra 2008 odločilo, da morajo biti postopki Evropske investicijske banke v državah v razvoju prednostno usmerjeni v razvoj pred drugimi gospodarskimi ali političnimi cilji,
K. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment in November 2008 whereby European Investment Bank (EIB) operations in developing countries must prioritise development over any economic or political objective,
L. ker je kriza pokazala, da je uradna razvojna pomoč edinstvena po osredotočenju na najrevnejše države in zagotavljanju razvojnega kapitala na bolj predvidljiv in zanesljivejši način kot drugi finančni tokovi,
L. whereas the crisis has shown that ODA is unique in targeting the poorest countries and providing development finance in a more predictable and reliable way than other financial flows,
1. pozdravlja povečano zanimanje in zavezanost Komisije, Sveta in držav članic za usklajenost politik za razvoj, kar se odraža v dveletnem poročanju;
Welcomes the increased attention and commitment to PCD by the Commission, the Council and the Member States, as demonstrated by the biennial reporting;
10. opozarja na dejstvo, da singapurska vprašanja, denimo liberalizacija storitev, naložbe in javna naročila, uvedba pravil o konkurenci in doslednejše uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine, niso namenjena izpolnitvi osmih razvojnih ciljev tisočletja;
Underlines the fact that the so-called 'Singapore issues', such as liberalisation of services, investment and government procurement, the introduction of competition rules and stronger enforcement of intellectual property rights, do not serve the aim of achieving the eight Millennium Development Goals;
12. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pripravijo celovito oceno sporazumov o ribištvu s tretjimi državami, kar bi zunanji politiki Unije na področju ribištva omogočilo popolno usklajenost z razvojno politiko, partnerske države Unije pa bi lahko okrepile svoje zmogljivosti za zagotovitev trajnostnega ribolova v svojih vodah, kar bi povečalo varnost preskrbe s hrano in lokalno zaposlovanje v tem sektorju;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to give an overall assessment of the fisheries agreements with third countries, so as to ensure that the European Union's external policy in the field of fisheries is completely consistent with its development policy, while strengthening European Union partner countries' capacity to guarantee sustainable fishing in their waters, enhancing food security and local employment in the sector;
15. opozarja, da 75 % revnejšega prebivalstva sveta živi na podeželju, da pa so kmetijstvu namenjeni le 4 % uradne razvojne pomoči; zato poziva Komisijo, države članice in države v razvoju, naj vprašanju kmetijstva v svoji razvojni politiki namenijo osrednjo vlogo;
Recalls that 75 % of the world’s poor population lives in rural areas, but that only 4 % of ODA is dedicated to agriculture; calls on the Commission, Member States and developing countries, therefore, to put the issue of agriculture at the top of their development agendas;
17. pozdravlja priporočilo iz sklepa Sveta z dne 14. maja 2008, po katerih naj bi v trgovinske sporazume vključili določbo o dobrem davčnem upravljanju, saj gre za prvi korak v boju proti davčnim določbam in praksam, ki spodbujajo davčne goljufije in utaje; poziva Komisijo, naj v pogajanja o prihodnjih trgovinskih sporazumih nemudoma vključi takšno določbo;
Welcomes the recommendation contained in the conclusions of the Council meeting of 14 May 2008 to include a clause on good governance in the tax area in trade agreements, since this constitutes the first step in the fight against fiscal measures and practices that encourage tax evasion and fraud; asks the Commission to include such a clause immediately in its negotiations on future trade agreements;
19. naroča Svetu, naj čim hitreje sprejme čim boljši dogovor o predlogu za revizijo direktive o obdavčevanju dohodka od prihrankov in zlasti glede držav, ki so navedene v Prilogi 1 te direktive in so prejemnice evropskih sredstev za razvoj;
Urges the Council to reach a rapid, comprehensive agreement on the proposal for amendment of the directive on taxation of savings income, particularly in relation to the countries listed in Annex 1 to this legislative proposal which receive European development funds;
22. poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja ukrepe pomoči za razvoj, ki lahko ob učinkih finančne krize preprečijo povečanje negotovosti in konfliktnosti, svetovne politične in gospodarske nestabilnosti ter povečanje prisilne migracije (begunci zaradi lakote);
Invites the Commission to promote development assistance actions that, taking account of the effects of the financial crisis, can prevent a rise in insecurity and conflict, global political and economic instability, and an increase in forced migration (‘refugees from hunger ’);
26. poudarja, da je pristop k usklajenosti politik za razvoj dolgoročna naloga ključnega pomena, da bi se ji tako zagotovila trajna podpora; poudarja pomen pravočasne ocene politik za preprečitev negativnih vplivov na države v razvoju; v ta namen zahteva, da se preveri vpliv dejavnosti evropskih in neevropskih zasebnih akterjev, s posebnim poudarkom na multinacionalkah;
Underlines the crucial need to approach PCD as a long-term endeavour so as to secure lasting support for PCD; stresses the importance of a timely assessment of policies to avoid negative impacts on developing countries; to this end, asks for the impact of the activities of European and non-European private players to be assessed, paying particular attention to multinationals;
32. poziva Komisijo, naj dodatno pojasni pristop celotne Unije in njen vpliv na razvojno politiko EU; je zaskrbljen, da bi lahko bil tak pristop vključen v naslednjo finančno perspektivo;
Asks the Commission to further clarify the whole-of-the-Union approach and its impact on the EU’s development policy; expresses concern that this approach could be integrated into the next Financial Perspective;
34. priznava, da je izjemno pomembno izpolniti zaveze glede uradne razvojne pomoči, vendar to še vedno ne zadošča za reševanje nujnega vprašanja o razvoju, zato ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma opredeli dodatne inovativne vire za financiranje razvoja ter predstavi predloge za uvedbo davka na mednarodne finančne transakcije, da se ustvarijo dodatni viri za premagovanje najhujših posledic krize in prizadevanje za uresničitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja;
Recognises that the fulfilment of the ODA commitments is imperative but still not sufficient to tackle the development emergency, and reiterates its call upon the Commission to identify as a matter of urgency additional innovative sources of finance for development, and to present proposals for the introduction of an international financial transaction tax to generate additional resources in order to overcome the worst consequences of the crisis and to keep on track towards the achievement of the MDGs;
37. opozarja, da v skladu z institucionalnim okvirom EU predlaga imenovanje stalnega poročevalca za „usklajenost politik za razvoj”, ki bo imel nalogo spremljati neskladnosti politik EU in o tem obveščati Odbor za razvoj;
Recalls that, in accordance with the EU institutional framework, it proposes to appoint a standing rapporteur for 'policy coherence for development', with the mandate of following up, and informing the DEVE Committee of, incoherencies in EU policies;
42. opozarja, da mora biti trgovinska politika usklajena z drugimi politikami (okoljskimi in socialnimi), predvsem pri trgovinskih sporazumih s spodbudami za proizvodnjo biogoriv v državah v razvoju;
Reiterates the need for coherence between trade policy and other (environmental and social) policies, notably in regard to trade agreements containing incentives for the production of biofuels in developing countries;
46. poziva Komisijo, naj ustrezno upošteva predpogoje Parlamenta za soglasje k sklenitvi trgovinskih sporazumov, da se generalnemu direktoratu za trgovino zagotovi skladen mandat za trgovinska pogajanja;
Calls on the Commission, in order to ensure that DG Trade has a coherent mandate for trade negotiations, to take due account of Parliament's preconditions for giving its consent to the conclusion of trade agreements;
30) obveznosti EU do držav AKP v okviru te pomoči zmanjšale z 2.975 milijonov EUR leta 2005 na 2.097 milijonov EUR leta 2007, da je delež celotnih obveznosti iz naslova pomoči za trgovino, ki so ga prejele AKP, v istem obdobju padel s 50 % na 36 % ter da to ni v skladu z danimi obljubami, da bosta prednostna cilja izkoreninjenje revščine in razvoj;
30), the EU's AfT commitments to the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States fell from €2975 million in 2005 to €2097 million in 2007, that the ACP's share of the EU's overall AfT commitments fell from 50% to 36% over the same period, and that this is not consistent with prior promises to prioritise poverty eradication and development;
54. znova poudarja, da bi morala EU podpirati države v razvoju, ki uporabljajo prilagodljivost iz sporazuma TRIPS, da lahko v okviru domačih programov javnega zdravja zagotavljajo najnujnejša zdravila po dostopni ceni;
Reiterates that the EU should support those developing countries which use the 'flexibilities' built into the TRIPS Agreement in order to be able to provide medicines at affordable prices under their domestic public health programmes;
56. obžaluje, da so v sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu CARIFORUM-ES in v sporazumu z državami Andske skupnosti, ki je tik pred sklenitvijo, vključene določbe TRIPS+, saj gre za določbe, ki ustvarjajo prepreke pri dostopu do nujnih zdravil;
Deplores the TRIPS+ provisions included in the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement, and in the agreements that are being negotiated with the countries of the Andean Community and Central America, provisions which create barriers to access to essential medicines;
61. pozdravlja nedavne odgovore Komisije, da bo ponovno preučila Uredbo (ES) št. 1383/2003, ki je imela nenamerne posledice na tranzit generičnih zdravil prek Evropske unije, katerih končni cilj so države v razvoju;
Welcomes the Commission's recent comments to the effect that it will look again at Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003, which has had unintended consequences for the transit through the EU of generic medicines which were ultimately destined for developing countries;
64. pozdravlja odgovore Komisije v smislu, da bi Evropska unija lahko znižala tarife za okolju prijazno blago s podobno mislečimi državami, če v organizaciji WTO ne bi mogli doseči dogovora;
Welcomes the Commission's comments to the effect that the EU could lower tariffs on environment-friendly goods with like-minded countries in the event that an agreement cannot be found within the WTO;
66. priznava gospodarski pomen denarnih pošiljk državam v razvoju, vendar poudarja, da je treba pri izvajanju dvostranskih trgovinskih sporazumov obravnavati vprašanje bega možganov, zlasti v zdravstvenem sektorju;
Acknowledges the economic importance of remittances to developing countries, but stresses the need to address the issue of 'brain drain' in the implementation of bilateral trade agreements, in particular within the health sector;
70. poziva Komisijo, naj v trgovinske sporazume, ki jih sklepa Evropska unija, sistematično vključuje pravno zavezujoče socialne in okoljske standarde, s čimer bo spodbujala cilj trgovine v službi razvoja;
Asks the Commission to include legally binding social and environmental standards systematically in trade agreements negotiated by the European Union, in order to promote the objective of trade working for development;
76. poziva Komisijo, naj komisarju za razvoj podeli izključno pristojnost za dodeljevanje po različnih državah, za državne, regionalne in tematske strateške dokumente, za letne akcijske programe in za izvrševanje programov pomoči v vseh državah v razvoju v tesnem sodelovanju z visoko predstavnico in komisarjem za človekoljubno pomoč, da se preprečijo neusklajeni pristopi v kolegiju komisarjev in v Svetu;
Calls on the Commission to give the Commissioner for Development sole responsibility for country allocations, Country, Regional and Thematic Strategy papers, National and Multiannual Indicative Programmes, Annual Action programmes and the implementation of aid in all developing countries, in close cooperation with the High Representative and the Humanitarian Aid Commissioner, in order to avoid incoherent approaches within the College and the Council;
80. predlaga Svetu, naj izboljša delovanje sedanjih struktur za skladnejše delovanje politik za razvoj, na primer z več skupnimi sejami delovnih skupin in javno dostopnim delovnim programom;
Suggests that the Council improve the work of existing structures for enhancing PCD, for example by having more joint meetings of the working groups and making the work programme publicly accessible;
Usklajenost politik pomeni, da morajo biti vsa področja politik EU oblikovana tako, da podpirajo razvojne potrebe držav v razvoju.
Policy coherence implies that all EU policy areas must be designed to support developing countries’ development needs.
Čeprav je EU zavezana k usklajenosti politik za razvoj, pa spodnji primeri kažejo, da njene politike na različne načine onemogočajo razvojne cilje.
Despite the EU’s commitment to PCD, its policies undermine development objectives in several ways, for example:
− Trgi držav v razvoju so preplavljeni z močno subvencioniranimi evropskimi izdelki, kar slabi njihovo gospodarsko in socialno infrastrukturo, zaostruje podhranjenost in pomanjkanje hrane, krajevne kmete pa izpostavlja strukturni revščini ter vedno večji odvisnosti od zunanje pomoči.
− In developing countries, markets are flooded by heavily subsidised European products, which contribute to the weakening of these countries’ economic and social infrastructure, exacerbating malnutrition and famine and exposing local farmers to structural poverty and accelerated dependence on external aid;
− Več držav, med njimi tako Malezija, Indonezija in Kolumbija kot tudi številne afriške države, je velike površine svojih kmetijskih zemljišč namenilo proizvodnji biogoriva, da bi zadostile potrebam EU po obnovljivi energiji, na račun varne preskrbe s hrano in biotske raznovrstnosti.
− Several countries, such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Colombia, as well as a number of African countries, have set aside large parts of their farmland for agrofuel production to meet the EU’s renewable energy need at the expense of food security and biodiversity;
− Množično prisvajanje zemljišč za biogorivo resno ogroža preživetje malih kmetov.
− A massive land grab for agrofuel constitutes a serious threat to the livelihood of small farmers.
V severni Gani so za plantaže jatrofe posekali prek 10.000 hektarjev; v Tanzaniji so za proizvodnjo biogoriva namenili 60 % rodovitne zemlje; v Senegalu potekajo pogajanja za 50.000–200.000 hektarjev, čeprav vse te države ne proizvedejo dovolj hrane za kritje lokalnih potreb potrošnikov.
Over 10,000 hectares have been cleared for jatropha plantation in Northern Ghana; up to 60% of fertile land has been allocated for agrofuel in Tanzania; 50,000 to 200,000 hectares are under negotiation in Senegal, and yet all these countries are not self sufficient in producing food to cover local consumption;
− Dokument „Globalna Evropa: Konkurenca v svetu“ s trgovinsko strategijo EU kaže, da dvostranske in regionalne strategije politike proste trgovine pospešujejo dostop EU do trgov surovin držav v razvoju, vključno s kmetijskimi proizvodi s tem, ko jih odpirajo velikim evropskim podjetjem v škodo malih kmetov in mlade gospodarske panoge.
− The document ‘Global Europe: competing in the World’ containing the EU’s trade strategy shows that the bilateral and regional free trade policy strategies foster the EU’s access to developing countries’ raw materials markets, including agricultural commodities, by opening them to EU large companies at the expense of small scale farmers and infant industry;
− Dostop do trgov EU je za države v razvoju v praksi omejen na izvoz surovin, ki so manj obdavčene v primerjavi s predelanim blagom.
− The EU market access for developing countries is in practice relegated to raw material export, which is less taxed compared to processed goods.
Ta politika ohranja države v razvoju v njihovi vlogi dobaviteljev surovin za industrijo EU.
This policy perpetuates developing countries in their role as providers of raw materials for EU industry;
− Finančna liberalizacija, vključno s špekulativnimi in nestabilnimi finančnimi tokovi, nad katerimi države v razvoju skoraj nimajo nadzora, je ustvarila precejšnjo nestabilnost na mednarodni ravni in ima uničujoč učinek na gospodarstva držav v razvoju.
− Financial liberalisation, including speculative and volatile financial flows, over which the developing countries have little control, has generated significant instability at international level with disastrous impacts on developing countries’ economies;