natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o navajanju porabe energije in drugih virov izdelkov, ki vplivajo na rabo energije, s pomočjo nalepk in standardiziranih podatkov o izdelku
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products
KOM(2008) 778 končno z dne 13.11.2008 – 2008/0222 (COD)
COM(2008) 778 final of 13.11.2008 - 2008/0222 (COD)
V skladu z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematični uporabi prenovitve pravnih aktov in zlasti točko 9 Sporazuma se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 26. novembra in 4. decembra 2008, da bi med drugim proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je vložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 26 November and 4 December 2008 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je na teh sestankih
At those meetings
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to izvirna jezikovna različica obravnavanega besedila. po preučitvi predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prenovitvi Direktive Sveta 92/75/EGS z dne 22. septembra 1992 o navajanju porabe energije in drugih virov gospodinjskih aparatov s pomočjo nalepk in standardiziranih podatkov o izdelku soglasno ugotovila, kot sledi:
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Directive 92/75/EEC of 22 September 1992 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by household appliances resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
(1) Naslednji deli besedila prenovljenega predloga bi morali biti osenčeni s sivo barvo za označitev bistvenih sprememb:
1) The following parts of the text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes:
– v členu 2 celotno besedilo pete alinee;
- in Article 2, the entire text of the fifth indent;
– v členu 3(1)(b) beseda „ potrošnike “ (ki je prečrtana z dvojno črto) in izraz „ končne uporabnike “ (ki je predstavljen med puščicama, ki označujeta spremembo);
- in Article 3(1)(b), the word " consumers " (having been marked with double strikethrough) and the expression " end-users " (having been presented between adaptation arrows);
– v členu 5(6) zadnja poved „ Uporabljeni standardni podatki o izdelku morajo biti v vseh pogledih skladni s to direktivo in z izvedbenimi direktivami “ (ki je prečrtana z dvojno črto);
- in Article 5(6), the final sentence " The fiches used shall in all respects comply with this Directive and with the implementing directives " (marked with double strikethrough);
– v členu 7 besedi „ kupca “ in „ kupci “ (ki sta prečrtani z dvojno črto) ter izraza „ končnega uporabnika “ in „ končni uporabniki “ (ki sta predstavljena med puščicama, ki označujeta spremembo);
- in Article 7, the words " customer " and " customers " (marked with double strikethrough) and the expressions " end-user " and " end-users " (presented between adaptation arrows);
– v členu 11(4), uvodno besedilo, beseda „ predvsem “ (ki je predstavljena med puščicama, ki označujeta spremembo);
- in Article 11(4), introductory wording, the words " in particular " (presented between adaptation arrows).
Zaradi sprejetja tega novega akta o spremembah bi se morali ustrezni deli prenovljenega besedila glasiti, kot sledi:
By virtue of the adoption of that new amending act, the relevant parts of the recast text should have been presented as follows:
– med odstavkoma 2 in 3 člena 1 bi se moralo besedilo člena 1(2) Direktive 92/75/EGS, ki ga zadeva predlog za črtanje, glasiti „ Seznam v tem členu se lahko razširi z dodatnimi tipi gospodinjskih aparatov .
- between paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 1, the wording of Article 1(2) of Directive 92/75/EEC, in respect of which a deletion is being proposed, should have read " Further types of household appliance may be added to the list in this Article.
Ti ukrepi, namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 10(2). “;
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 10(2) ";
– med odstavkoma 1 in 2 člena 4 bi se moralo besedilo člena 2(2) Direktive 92/75/EGS, ki ga zadeva predlog za črtanje, glasiti „ Podrobnosti v zvezi z nalepko in standardnimi podatki o izdelku se določijo z direktivami v zvezi z vsakim tipom aparata, ki se sprejmejo v skladu s to direktivo .
- between paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 4, the wording of Article 2(2) of Directive 92/75/EEC, in respect of which a deletion is being proposed, should have read " Details relating to the label and the fiche shall be defined by directives relating to each type of appliance adopted pursuant to this Directive.
Ti ukrepi, namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive z njenim dopolnjevanjem, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 10(2). “;
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 10(2) ";
– besedilo člena 9 Direktive 92/75/EGS, ki ga zadeva predlog za popolno črtanje, bi se moralo glasiti:
- the wording of Article 9 of Directive 92/75/EEC, for which a complete deletion is being proposed, should have read as follows:
„ Komisija z izvedbenimi direktivami in dodajanjem nadaljnjih gospodinjskih aparatov v seznam iz člena 1(1), kadar se lahko dosežejo znatni energetski prihranki, sprejme in tehničnemu napredku prilagodi ukrepe v zvezi z uvedbo in delovanjem sistema.
" The Commission shall adopt, and adapt to technical progress, measures relating to the establishment and operation of the scheme by way of implementing Directives and by way of the addition of further household appliances to the list in Article 1(1) where significant energy savings are likely to be achieved.
Ti ukrepi, namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive, med drugim z dopolnjevanjem, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 10(2). “
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, inter alia, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 10(2) .".
(3) V delu B Priloge I je treba poleg številke pravnega akta „ 92/75/EGS “ navesti rok za prenos, 1. julij 1993, in rok za začetek uporabe, 1. januar 1994.
3) In Annex I, Part B, in correspondence with the act number " 92/75/EEC " a deadline for transposition of 1 July 1993 and a deadline for application of 1 January 1994 should be indicated.
Navedbo „ 2009/[*]/ES “ je treba odstraniti.
The indication " 2009/[*]/EC " should be removed.
O navajanju porabe energije in drugih virov izdelkov, ki vplivajo na rabo energije, s pomočjo nalepk in standardiziranih podatkov o izdelku (prenovitev)
Labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products (recast)
o osnutku okvirnega sklepa Sveta o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb o nadzornih ukrepih med državami članicami Evropske unije kot alternativi začasnemu priporu
on the draft Council Framework Decision on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention
(ponovno posvetovanje)
(Renewed consultation)
– ob upoštevanju osnutka Sveta (17002/2008),
– having regard to the Council draft (17002/2008),
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0468 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0468 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 7. novembra 2007
– having regard to its position of 7 November 2007
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0551 . ,
Adopted texts, P6_TA(2007)0551 . ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom (C-6-0038/2009),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C-6-0009/2009),
– ob upoštevanju členov 93 in 51 ter člena 55(3) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 93, 51 and 55(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0147/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0147/2009 ),
5. je odločen, da bo v primeru, če osnutek ne bo sprejet pred začetkom veljavnosti lizbonske pogodbe, vsak prihodnji predlog obravnaval po nujnem postopku v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti;
Should that draft not be adopted prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, is determined to consider any future proposal by urgent procedure, in close cooperation with the national parliaments;
Osnutek okvirnega sklepa
Draft Framework Decision
(13a) V primeru kršitve evropskega nadzornega ukrepa lahko organ, ki ga je izdal, sklene, da bo izdal evropski nalog za prijetje, da se osumljenca privede v državo izdaje.
(13a) In the event of a breach of a European supervision measure, the issuing authority may decide to issue a European arrest warrant for the purpose of transferring the suspect to the issuing State.
V teh okoliščinah, ki bi morale biti strogo omejene le na izvrševanje tega okvirnega sklepa, okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/584/PNZ s 13. junija 2002 zajema vsa kazniva dejanja, v zvezi s katerimi je mogoče izdati evropski nadzorni ukrep.
In such circumstances, which should be strictly limited to the application of this Framework Decision, Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 covers all offences in relation to which a European supervision measure may be issued.
Namen predloga spremembe je doseči skladnost z novim naslovom osnutka Sveta.
In order to be consistent with the new title wording of the Council draft.
(17a) Enoten niz postopkovnih jamstev je nujni pogoj za zagotovitev pravične in učinkovite uporabe ukrepov v zvezi s pravosodnim sodelovanjem v kazenskih zadevah; ob ustreznem upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta mora Svet nemudoma sprejeti pravni instrument o postopkovnih jamstvih, ki temelji na načelu domneve nedolžnosti, ki mora vsebovati najmanj odobritev pravosodnega organa za vsako omejitev ali odvzem prostosti, pravico do „obvestila o pravicah“, do pravnega svetovanja, do dokazov, do obveščenosti o naravi in vzrokih za obtožbo ter o razlogih za sum, pravico do dostopa do vseh zadevnih dokumentov v jeziku, ki ga osumljenec/obtoženec razume in pravico do tolmača;
(17a) A uniform common set of procedural guarantees is a necessary prerequisite to ensuring a fair and effective application of measures concerning judicial cooperation in criminal matters; taking into due consideration the opinion of the European Parliament, the Council should without delay adopt a legal instrument on procedural safeguards in criminal proceedings, based upon the principle of presumption of innocence, which should include at least the authorization by the judicial authority for any restriction or deprivation of freedom, the right to a "Letter of Rights", to legal advice, to evidence, to be informed on the nature and reasons of the charges and of the grounds for suspicion , the right to access to all relevant documents in a language the suspect/defendant understands and to an interpreter;
V tem okvirnem sklepu je kot nerezident opredeljena oseba, ki ima zakonito in običajno stalno prebivališče v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri poteka postopek.
For the purpose of this Framework Decision, a person is considered as non resident when his/her lawful and ordinary residence is fixed in a Member State different from the Member States where the proceeding is going on.
Primerno je, da se pojasni opredelitev stalnega prebivališča.
It appears appropriate to clarify the definition of the residence.
Člen 4 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Article 4 - paragraph 1 - point a
a) "odločba o nadzornih ukrepih" pomeni izvršljivo odločbo pristojnega organa države izdaje, sprejeto med kazenskim postopkom v skladu z njenim nacionalnim pravom in postopki, s katero se fizični osebi, kot alternativa začasnemu priporu, izreče eden ali več nadzornih ukrepov;
a) "decision on supervision measures" shall mean an enforceable decision taken in the course of criminal proceedings by a competent authority of the issuing State in accordance with its national law and procedures and imposing on a natural person, as an alternative to provisional detention, one or more supervision measures;
a) "odločba o nadzornih ukrepih" pomeni izvršljivo odločbo pristojnega pravosodnega organa države izdaje, sprejeto med kazenskim postopkom v skladu z njenim nacionalnim pravom in postopki, s katero se fizični osebi, kot alternativa začasnemu priporu, izreče eden ali več nadzornih ukrepov;
a) "decision on supervision measures" shall mean an enforceable decision taken in the course of criminal proceedings by a competent judicial authority of the issuing State in accordance with its national law and procedures and imposing on a natural person, as an alternative to provisional detention, one or more supervision measures;
Eno najpomembnejših postopkovnih jamstev je, da samo pravosodni organi lahko sprejmejo odločbe v zvezi z osebno prostostjo.
One of the most important procedural safeguards is that decisions involving personal freedom should be adopted only by judicial authorities.
V predlogu Komisije je upoštevan enak pristop.
The same approach was followed in the Commission's proposal.
Člen 4 – odstavek 1 – točka d a (novo)
Article 4 - paragraph 1 - point d a (new)
(da) "pristojni organ v državi izdaje" pomeni sodišče, sodnika, preiskovalnega sodnika ali javnega tožilca, ki je v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo pristojen za izdajo odločbe o nadzornih ukrepih;
( d a ) “ competent authority in the issuing State ” shall mean a court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor, with competence under national law to issue a decision on supervision measures;
Člen 4 – odstavek 1 – točka d b (novo)
Article 4 - paragraph 1 - point d b (new)
(db) "pristojni organ v državi izvršitve" pomeni sodišče, sodnika, preiskovalnega sodnika ali javnega tožilca, ki je v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo pristojen za izvršitev in spremljanje odločbe o nadzornih ukrepih;
( db ) “ competent authority in the executing State ” shall mean a court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor, with competence under national law to execute and monitor decision on supervision measures
Eno najpomembnejših postopkovnih jamstev je, da samo pravosodni organi oz. sodniki, preiskovalni sodniki in javni tožilci lahko izdajajo, izvajajo in nadzorujejo odločbe v zvezi z osebno prostostjo.
One of the most important procedural safeguards is that decisions involving personal freedom should only be issued executed and monitored by the judicial authorities, or in other words judges, investigating magistrates and public prosecutors.
V predlogu Komisije je upoštevan enak pristop.
The same approach was followed in the Commission's proposal .
Obdelovanje osebnih podatkov za namene tega okvirnega sklepa je v skladu vsaj z osnovnimi načeli, določenimi z okvirnim sklepom 2008/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah 1 , in Konvencijo Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov in poznejšimi protokoli.
The processing of personal data for the purposes of this Framework Decision shall comply with at least the basic principles laid down in Framework Decision 2008/ 977 / JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters 1 and in the Council of Europe Convention nr 108 of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of individuals with regard to Automated Processing of their personal data and the subsequent protocols.
1 UL L 350, 30.12.2008, str.
1 OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 in brez poseganja v odstavek 3 lahko države članice imenujejo nepravosodne organe kot pristojne organe za odločanje na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa pod pogojem, da so ti organi v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom in postopki pristojni za sprejemanje podobnih odločb.
As an exception to paragraph 1 and without prejudice to paragraph 3, Member States may designate non-judicial authorities as the competent authorities for taking decisions under this Framework Decision, provided that such authorities have competence for taking decisions of a similar nature under their national law and procedures.
To določbo je treba črtati, da se doseže skladnost s predlogi sprememb člena 4.
This provision should be deleted in the interests of consistency with the amendments concerning Article 4.
Člen 8 – odstavek 1 – točka f a (novo)
Article 8 - paragraph 1 - point f a (new)
fa) obveznost depozita določenega denarnega zneska ali zagotovitve drugega jamstva bodisi v določenem številu obrokov bodisi v enkratnem znesku.
fa) an obligation to deposit a certain sum of money or to give another type of guarantee, which may either be provided through a specific number of instalments or entirely at once .
V odstavek tega člena o obveznostih je treba vključiti denarno ali drugo jamstvo.
Monetary or other type of guarantee should be included in the obligatory paragraph of this article.
Tovrstni nadzorni ukrep je mogoče preprosto opredeliti in uporabiti.
This kind of supervision measure is easy to define and apply.
Prav tako ga je mogoče preprosto in cenovno ugodno spremljati, poleg tega pa ne prinaša dodatnih stroškov.
It is also easy and affordable to monitor and does not involve any supplementary cost.
Člen 8 – odstavek 2 – točka c
Article 8 - paragraph 2 - point c
c) obveznost depozita določenega denarnega zneska ali zagotovitve drugega jamstva bodisi v določenem številu obrokov bodisi v enkratnem znesku.
c) an obligation to deposit a certain sum of money or to give another type of guarantee, which may either be provided through a specific number of instalments or entirely at once;
Besedilo je črtano zaradi skladnosti s predlogom spremembe 21.
Is deleted in the interests of consistency with Amendment 21
Odločitev o nadzornih ukrepih se lahko posreduje pristojnemu organu države članice, v kateri ima oseba zakonito običajno prebivališče, in sicer v primerih, ko oseba, potem ko je bila obveščena o zadevnih ukrepih, privoli v vrnitev v to državo.
A decision on supervision measures may be forwarded to the competent authority of the Member State in which the person is lawfully and ordinarily residing, in cases where the person, having been informed about the measures concerned consents to return to that State.
Odločitev o nadzornih ukrepih se lahko posreduje pristojnemu organu države članice, v kateri ima oseba zakonito običajno prebivališče, in sicer v primerih, ko oseba, potem ko je bila natančno obveščena o zadevnih ukrepih v jeziku, ki ga razume, privoli v vrnitev v to državo.
A decision on supervision measures may be forwarded to the competent authority of the Member State in which the person is lawfully and ordinarily residing, in cases where the person, having been accurately informed about the measures concerned in a language which he/she understands , consents to return to that State.
Do sprejetja daljnosežnega instrumenta na področju postopkovnih jamstev bi bilo primerno, da bi vzpostavili vsaj minimalna postopkovna jamstva glede izvajanja nadzornih ukrepov in zlasti pravico osumljenca, da je natančno obveščen v jeziku, ki ga razume.
Pending the adoption of a far‑reaching instrument in the field of procedural safeguards, it would be appropriate to establish, at the least, minimum procedural safeguards concerning the execution of supervision measures and notably the right for the suspect to be accurately informed in a language he/she understands
Člen 13 – odstavek 2
Article 13 - paragraph 2
Prilagojeni nadzorni ukrep ni strožji od prvotno izrečenega nadzornega ukrepa.
The adapted supervision measure shall not be more severe than the supervision measure which was originally imposed.
Prilagojeni nadzorni ukrep je zgolj tehnične narave in ne določa dodatnih obveznosti za zadevno osebo; ni strožji od prvotno izrečenega nadzornega ukrepa.
The adapted supervision measure shall be of a technical nature only and shall not of itself impose additional obligations on the person concerned .
Pojasniti je treba, da organ izvršitve ne more dodati nobenih obveznosti tistim, ki jih je določil organ izdaje.
It should be made clear that the executing authority cannot add any obligations to those which are imposed by the issuing authority.
Brez ugotavljanja identitete norme se pod pogoji tega okvirnega sklepa priznava odločba o nadzornih ukrepih za naslednja kazniva dejanja, kot so opredeljena po pravu države izdaje, če je v tej državi zanje zagrožena kazen zapora ali ukrep, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti do najmanj treh let:
The following offences, if they are punishable in the issuing State by a custodial sentence or a measure involving deprivation of liberty for a maximum period of at least three years, and as they are defined by the law of the issuing State, shall, under the terms of this Framework Decision and without verification of the double criminality of the act, give rise to recognition of the decision on supervision measures :
– sodelovanje v hudodelski združbi,
− participation in a criminal organisation,
– trgovina z ljudmi,
− trafficking in human beings,
– spolno izkoriščanje otrok in otroška pornografija,
− sexual exploitation of children and child pornography,
– nedovoljena trgovina s prepovedanimi drogami in psihotropnimi snovmi,
− illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances,
– nedovoljena trgovina z orožjem, strelivom in razstrelivi,
− illicit trafficking in weapons, munitions and explosives,
– goljufije, vključno z goljufijo, ki škodi finančnim interesom Evropskih skupnosti v smislu Konvencije z dne 26. julija 1995 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti,
− fraud, including that affecting the financial interests of the European Communities within the meaning of the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests 1,
– pranje premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem,
− laundering of the proceeds of crime,
– ponarejanje denarja, vključno z eurom,
− counterfeiting currency, including of the euro,
- kibernetski kriminal,
− computer-related crime,
– kazniva dejanja zoper okolje, vključno z nedovoljeno trgovino z ogroženimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami;
− environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties,
– omogočanje prepovedanega prehoda čez državno mejo in bivanja v državi,
− facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence,
– umor, huda telesna poškodba,
− murder, grievous bodily injury,
– nedovoljena trgovina s človeškimi organi in tkivi,
− illicit trade in human organs and tissue,
– ugrabitev, protipraven odvzem prostosti in jemanje talcev,
− kidnapping, illegal restraint and hostage-taking,