natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: predsednik Klaus-Heiner Lehne, podpredsednik Luigi Berlinguer , podpredsednica Evelyn Regner, poročevalka Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Françoise Castex, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Cecilia Wikström, Jiří Maštálka, Kurt Lechner, Angelika Niebler, Jan Philipp Albrecht, Eva Lichtenberger, Sajjad Karim. odločil, da vam priporoči, naj bo podlaga za predlog člen 192(1) PDEU.
The following were present for the final vote: Klaus-Heiner Lehne (Chair), Luigi Berlinguer (Vice-Chair), Evelyn Regner (Vice-Chair), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (Rapporteur), Tadeusz Zwiefka, Françoise Castex, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Cecilia Wikström, Jiří Maštálka, Kurt Lechner, Angelika Niebler, Jan Philipp Albrecht, Eva Lichtenberger, Sajjad Karim. to recommend that the proposal should be based on Article 192(1) TFEU.
Pripravljavec mnenja: George Lyon
Rapporteur: George Lyon
Pripravljavec mnenja bi rad kot podlago za razpravo povzel nekaj dejstev in številk v povezavi s pridelavo gensko spremenjenih organizmov (GSO):
Your Rapporteur would like to recall some facts and figures on GMO cultivation as a basis for discussion:
– v EU sta trenutno za gojenje odobreni dve vrsti GSO: koruza MON810 in krompir Amflora
- 2 GMO crops are currently authorised for cultivation in the EU: MON810 maize and Amflora potato
– 17 vrst GSO čaka na odobritev za gojenje v EU
- 17 GMOs are awaiting authorisation for cultivation in the EU
– v celoti je bila leta 2009 v petih državah članicah koruza MON810 posajena na 94.800 hektarjih (Španija, Češka republika, Portugalska, Romunija in Slovaška), od tega 80 % v Španiji (v primerjavi s 107.700 hektarji leta 2008, preden je Nemčija prekinila pridelavo).
- A total of 94,800 ha. of MON810 maize were grown in 5 Member States in 2009 (Spain, Czech Republic, Portugal, Romania and Slovakia), 80% of which were in Spain (compared to 107,700 ha. in 2008, before Germany discontinued cultivation).
Krompir Amflora trenutno pridelujejo tri države članice: Švedska, Nemčija in Češka republika.
Amflora potato is currently cultivated in 3 Member States: Sweden, Germany and Czech Republic.
Leta 2009 je 14 milijonov kmetov na svetu nasadilo 134 milijonov hektarjev GSO
In 2009, 14 million farmers worldwide planted 134 million ha. of GMOs
Podatki za koruzo, sojo, bombaž in repično seme. , od tega je bilo 64 milijonov hektarjev v ZDA, več kot 21 milijonov hektarjev v Braziliji in Argentini ter več kot 8 milijonov hektarjev v državah, kot sta Kanada in Indija.
Records are taken for maize, soybean, cotton and rapeseed , with 64 million ha. planted in the USA, over 21 million ha. in Brazil and Argentina respectively, and over 8 million ha. in countries such as Canada and India.
Te številke kažejo na trenuten zastoj v zvezi z odločanjem o GSO v EU in na pomanjkanje odgovorov na utemeljene skrbi kmetov in potrošnikov.
These figures illustrate the current deadlock surrounding the decision-making on GMOs in the EU and the lack of answers to genuine concerns expressed by farmers and consumers.
Znanstveni pristop k novi tehnologiji
A science-based approach to new technology
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da bi morali biti najboljši znanstveni nasveti in pristop, ki temelji na oceni tveganja, podlaga za ugotavljanje varnosti novih tehnologij.
Your Rapporteur believes that best scientific advice and a risk-based approach should be the key principles in determining the safety of new technologies.
Brez znanstvenih nasvetov za potrjevanje odločitev o varnosti novih metod in praks obstaja tveganje, da bodo odločitve sprejete glede na popularnost in ne glede na varnost.
Without the bedrock of scientific advice to anchor decisions on safety of new methods and practices, society runs the risk of decisions being taken on the basis of what is popular rather than what is safe.
Drugi elementi, kot so družbenoekonomska vprašanja ali etične dileme, ne morejo nadomestiti na znanosti temelječih odločitev o varnosti.
Other elements such as socio-economic concerns or ethical considerations cannot substitute for science-based decisions on safety.
Pripravljavec mnenja priznava, da predlog Komisije v sedanji obliki ne ogroža skupnega evropskega znanstvenega postopka za odobritev GSO.
Your Rapporteur recognises that the Commission's proposal as it stands does not undermine the common scientific GMO authorisation procedure in Europe.
Namen predloga
Purpose of the proposal
Komisija navaja, da želi poleg oblikovanja celovitega pravnega okvira za odobritev proizvodov, sestavljenih ali pridobljenih iz GSO, s predlogom zagotoviti lažje odločanje in upoštevanje vseh pomembnih dejavnikov, državam članicam pa omogočiti dovolj prilagodljivosti za odločanje o gojenju GSO po njihovi odobritvi na ravni EU.
According to the Commission, in parallel to the comprehensive legal framework for the authorisation of products consisting of or derived from GMOs, the proposal seeks to "facilitate decision making", "take into account all relevant factors" and "grant Member States sufficient flexibility to decide on GMO cultivation after they have been authorised at EU level".
Medtem ko so pravne službe Sveta in Parlamenta izrazile resno zaskrbljenost glede pravne gotovosti, morebitne grožnje enotnemu trgu in neskladnosti s Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo, Pripravljavec mnenja po preučitvi vseh argumentov ugotavlja, da bi, gledano v celoti, Komisija s predlogom lahko uresničila svoje cilje in zagotovila priložnosti za napredek pri sprostitvi zastoja pri odločanju o GSO v EU.
While serious concerns have been raised by the Council and European Parliament legal services respectively regarding legal certainty, potential threats to the Single Market and WTO incompatibilities, your Rapporteur has come to the conclusion after weighing up all the arguments, that on balance, the proposal may deliver the Commission's objectives and provide some opportunities for progress in unlocking the deadlock on the decision-making surrounding GMOs in the EU.
Pripravljavec mnenja želi predvsem okrepiti predlog Komisije na področju odziva na zaskrbljenost glede notranjega trga in skladnosti s Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo.
The general approach taken by your Rapporteur is to strengthen the Commission's proposal in response to concerns about Internal Market and WTO-compliance.
Predlaga tudi zahtevo po spoštovanju načela sorazmernosti in svobodne izbire potrošnikov in kmetov.
Your Rapporteur has also introduced a requirement to respect the principle of proportionality and the freedom of choice for consumers and farmers.
Prav tako želi bolj zaščititi tiste kmete, ki želijo pridelovati brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov, in večjo pravno varnost državam članicam, ki želijo to prožnost izkoristiti.
He has also sought to give greater protection to those farmers who wish to cultivate GM-free and greater legal certainty to Member States using this flexibility.
Po mnenju pripravljavca mnenja bi bilo treba od držav članic zahtevati, naj v primeru, da se odločijo izkoristiti to novo pristojnost, zagotovijo, da se omejitve sprejemajo za vsak pridelek posebej.
Your Rapporteur believes that Member States should be required to adopt a case-by case approach when deciding to use this new power to ensure the restrictions are crop specific.
S tem bi priznali dejstvo, da GSO različnim regijam prinašajo različne grožnje in koristi, zato jih je treba ocenjevati posamično, da bi zagotovili, da države članice spoštujejo načelo sorazmernosti.
This would recognise the fact that different GMOs bring both different threats and benefits to different regions, and therefore should be assessed individually to make sure Member States respect the principle of proportionality.
Da bi spoštovali možnost svobodne izbire, kot je priznana v sklepih Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2008 in v mnenju Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 9. decembra 2010 (NAT 480 – CESE 1623/2010), je treba zagotoviti, da bodo države članice imele trdna pravila o soobstoju na njihovem ozemlju.
In order to respect the freedom of choice, as recognised in the Council conclusions of 4th December 2008 and the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 9th December 2010 (NAT 480 - CESE 1623/2010), it is necessary to ensure that Member States have robust co-existence rules in place on their territory.
Zato je treba predlagati spremembe člena 26a Direktive 2001/18/ES, da bi pridelovalcem gensko nespremenjenih proizvodov in potrošnikom, ki želijo pridelovati in kupovati proizvode brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov, zagotovili, da bodo njihove pravice spoštovane.
This requires an amendment to Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC to give reassurance to non-GM growers and consumers who wish to grow and purchase GM-free products that their right to do so will be respected.
Pripravljavec mnenja prav tako meni, da bi morale države članice pred sprejemom dodatnih omejitvenih ukrepov v skladu s predlaganim členom 26b v celoti izrabiti prožnost, ki jo omogočata člen 26a in novo priporočilo Komisije o soobstoju.
Your Rapporteur also believes that Member States should make full use of the flexibility granted under Article 26a and the Commission's new Recommendation on guidelines for co-existence before adopting further restrictive measures under the proposed Article 26b.
Vzporedno z ukrepi soobstoja in da bi pridelovalce gensko nespremenjenih proizvodov zaščitili pred gospodarsko izgubo zaradi naključne prisotnosti GSO na njihovih poljih in v njihovem semenu, pripravljavec mnenja poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predlog o tehničnih pragovih za označevanje sledi GSO v konvencionalnih semenih, kjer bodo vrednosti čim nižje, hkrati pa še vedno izvedljive, sorazmerne in funkcionalne za vse gospodarske subjekte, kot je pozval Svet v sklepih z dne 4. decembra 2008.
In parallel to the co-existence measures, and in order to protect non-GM growers from economic loss due to the adventitious presence of GMOs in their fields and in their seeds, your Rapporteur also asks the Commission to draw up a proposal on technical thresholds for labelling GMO traces in conventional seeds at the lowest practicable, proportionate and functional levels for all economic operators, as asked by the Council Conclusions of 4th December 2008.
Medtem ko je treba zagotoviti, da bodo omejitveni ukrepi sorazmerni in da bodo vsi potrebni praktični ukrepi sprejeti za spoštovanje svobodne izbire kmetov in potrošnikov, pripravljavec mnenja v kontekstu tega predloga predlaga okrepitev pravne gotovosti za kmete.
Finally, while ensuring that restrictive measures are proportionate and that all necessary practical measures are taken to respect the freedom of choice of farmers and consumers, your Rapporteur proposes to reinforce legal certainty for farmers in the context of this proposal.
Da bi dosegli ta cilj, morajo države članice z uporabo nove pristojnosti iz člena 26b Direktive 2001/187ES načrtovane omejitve objaviti in jih začeti izvajati vsaj tri mesece pred začetkom rastne sezone, da bi kmetom omogočili bolj gotovo vnaprejšnje načrtovanje.
To achieve this goal, Member States must publicise and implement the restrictions they plan to take using this new power under Article 26b of Directive 2001/187EC at least three months prior to the start of the growing season, so that farmers can plan ahead with some certainty.
Pripravljavec mnenja je zato pripravljen podpreti ta predlog, če bodo sprejeti dodatni zaščitni ukrepi iz tega mnenja.
Your Rapporteur is therefore ready to grant support to this proposal provided the additional safeguards proposed in this opinion are adopted.
(2) Na podlagi tega sklopa zakonodaje se bo za vsak GSO za gojenje posebej ocenilo tveganje, preden bo odobren za dajanje na trg Unije , pri tem pa se bodo v skladu s prilogo II Direktive 2001/18/ES upoštevali neposredni in posredni učinki, takojšni učinki in učinki z zakasnitvijo ter kumulativni dolgoročni učinki na zdravje ljudi in okolje .
(2) Under this set of legislation, GMOs for cultivation shall undergo an individual risk assessment before being authorised to be placed on the Union market , taking into account, in accordance with Annex II of Directive 2001/18/EC, the direct, indirect, immediate and delayed effects, as well as the cumulative long-term effects, on human health and the environment .
V nasprotju z vprašanji pri dajanju na trg in uvozu GSO, ki jih je treba še naprej urejati na ravni EU zaradi ohranitve notranjega trga, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je gojenje GSO vprašanje z izrazito lokalno/regionalno /teritorialno razsežnostjo in s posebnim pomenom za samoodločbo držav članic .
Contrary to issues related to the placing on the market and the import of GMOs, which should remain regulated at EU level to preserve the internal market, cultivation has been acknowledged as an issue with a strong local/regional /territorial dimension , and as one of particular importance for the self-determination of Member States .
V skladu s členom 2(2) PDEU je zato treba državam članicam dati možnost, da sprejmejo zavezujoče pravne predpise za učinkovito gojenje GSO na svojem ozemlju po tem, ko je bil GSO zakonito odobren za dajanje na trg EU.
In accordance with Article 2(2) TFEU Member States should therefore be entitled to have a possibility to adopt binding legislative provisions concerning the effective cultivation of GMOs in their territory after the GMO has been legally authorised to be placed on the EU market.
(6) Pri tem se zdi primerno, da se državam članicam v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti prizna več svobode pri odločanju, ali želijo na svojem ozemlju gojiti gensko spremenjene pridelke ali ne, ne da se s tem spremeni sistem Unije za odobritve GSO, in neodvisno od ukrepov , ki jih lahko države članice sprejmejo na podlagi člena 26a Direktive 2001/18/ES za preprečevanje nenamerne prisotnosti GSO v drugih proizvodih.
(6) In this context, it appears appropriate to grant to Member States, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, more freedom to decide whether or not they wish to cultivate GMO crops on their territory without changing the system of Union authorisations of GMOs and independently of the measures that Member States are entitled to take by application of Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in other products.
(6) Pri tem se zdi primerno, da se državam članicam v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti prizna več prožnosti pri odločanju, ali želijo na svojem ozemlju gojiti gensko spremenjene pridelke ali ne, ne da se s tem spremeni sistem Unije za odobritve GSO, in vzporedno z ukrepi , ki jih morajo države članice sprejeti na podlagi člena 26a Direktive 2001/18/ES , kot ga spreminja ta uredba, za preprečevanje nenamerne prisotnosti GSO v drugih proizvodih.
(6) In this context, it appears appropriate to grant to Member States, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, more flexibility to decide whether or not they wish to cultivate GMO crops on their territory without changing the system of Union authorisations of GMOs and in parallel with the measures that Member States must take by application of Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC, as amended by this Regulation, to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in other products.
(7) Zato je treba državam članicam dovoliti, da sprejmejo ukrepe za omejitev ali prepoved gojenja vseh ali nekaterih GSO na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu, ter te ukrepe spremenijo, kot se jim zdi ustrezno, na vseh stopnjah odobritve ali ponovne odobritve zadevnih GSO ali njihovega umika s trga .
(7) Member States should therefore be authorised to adopt measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation of all or particular GMOs in all or part of their territory, and respectively amend those measures as they deem appropriate, at all stages of the authorisation, re-authorisation or withdrawal from the market of the concerned GMOs.
Podobno ne smejo vplivati na gojenje gensko nespremenjenih sort semen in razmnoževalnega materiala rastlin, v katerih se ugotovijo naključne ali tehnično neizogibne sledi GSO, odobrenih v EU.
Similarly they should not affect the cultivation of non genetically modified varieties of seed and plant propagating material in which adventitious or technically unavoidable traces of EU authorised GMOs are found.
(7) Zato je treba državam članicam dovoliti, da sprejmejo ukrepe za omejitev ali prepoved gojenja nekaterih GSO , skupin GSO, opredeljenih kot sorte pridelkov, ali vseh GSO na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu, če so bili ti ukrepi predhodno predmet presoje vplivov in javnega posvetovanja ter so sprejeti in javno dostopni vsem nosilcem dejavnosti, tudi pridelovalcem, najmanj dvanajst mesecev pred začetkom setve.
(7) Member States should therefore be authorised to adopt measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation of particular GMOs, a group of GMOs defined by the crop variety, or all GMOs in all or part of their territory, provided those measures have been subject to prior impact assessment and public consultation, and as long as those measures are adopted and made publicly available to all operators concerned, including growers, at least twelve months prior to the start of sowing .
Ta izbira, ki je prepuščena državam članicam, je neposredno povezana z njihovo suverenostjo pri teritorialnem upravljanju in razvoju ter rabi zemljišč in s potrebo po ohranjanju raznolikosti ekosistemov.
This choice left to Member States is directly linked to their sovereignty on territorial management and development, land use and the need to preserve the diversity of ecosystems.
Vendar lahko države članice ukrepe za omejitev ali prepoved gojenja vseh ali nekaterih GSO na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu sprejmejo na podlagi drugačnih razlogov javnega interesa, kot so že obravnavani v usklajenem sklopu pravil EU , ki že določajo postopke za upoštevanje tveganja za zdravje in okolje, ki jih lahko povzroči uporaba GSO za gojenje.
However Member States may adopt measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation of all or particular GMOs in all or part of their territory on the basis of grounds relating to the public interest other than those already addressed by the harmonised set of EU rules which already provide for procedures to take into account the risks that a GMO for cultivation may pose on health and the environment.
Poleg tega morajo biti ti ukrepi v skladu s Pogodbama, zlasti glede načela nerazlikovanja med nacionalnimi in tujimi proizvodi ter členov 34 in 36 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, in z ustreznimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi Unije, zlasti v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji.
Those measures should furthermore be in conformity with the Treaties, in particular as regards the principle of non discrimination between national and non national products and Articles 34 and 36 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as well as with the relevant international obligations of the Union, notably in the context of the World Trade Organisation.
(8) V skladu s pravnim okvirom za odobritev GSO država članica ne more spremeniti ravni zaščite zdravja ljudi ali živali in okolja v Uniji in tak položaj je treba ohraniti.
(8) According to the legal framework for the authorisation of GMOs, the level of protection of human/animal health and of the environment chosen in the Union cannot be revised by a Member State and this situation must not be altered.
Vendar lahko države članice ukrepe za omejitev ali prepoved gojenja nekaterih GSO , skupin GSO, opredeljenih kot sorte pridelkov, ali vseh GSO na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu sprejmejo na podlagi drugačnih ustrezno utemeljenih razlogov javnega interesa, kot so že obravnavani v usklajenem sklopu pravil Unije , ki že določajo postopke za upoštevanje tveganja za zdravje in okolje, ki jih lahko povzroči uporaba GSO za gojenje.
However Member States may adopt measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation of particular GMOs , a group of GMOs defined by the crop variety, or all GMOs in all or part of their territory on the basis of duly justified grounds relating to the public interest other than those already addressed by the harmonised set of Union rules which already provide for procedures to take into account the risks that a GMO for cultivation may pose on health and the environment.
Jasno opredeljen pojem obvladovanja tveganja v Uredbi ES št. 178/2002 pa bi lahko uporabili kot osnovo za utemeljitev teh ukrepov.
The distinct notion of 'risk management', as established in Regulation EC No 178/2002 could be used, however, as a basis to justify those measures.
Utemeljijo se lahko na podlagi splošnih ciljev politike, kot so:
Such measures may be justified on the basis of general policy objectives such as:
– potreba po ohranjanju posebnih vrst kmetijstva, na primer ekološkega kmetovanja ali kmetovanja visoke naravne vrednosti,
- The need to preserve specific types of agriculture such as organic or high nature value farming, as well as traditional types of farming,
– razlogi, povezani z varstvom raznolikosti kmetijske proizvodnje,
- Grounds related to the protection of the diversity of agricultural production,
– varstvo območij brez GSO, če veljavni ukrepi za soobstoj ne zagotavljajo zadostnega varstva,
- The protection of GMO-free areas provided that co-existence measures in place are not sufficient to protect,
– nemožnost soobstoja zaradi posebnih geografskih razmer (na primer majhni otoki, hribi, majhno državno ozemlje),
- The impossibility to implement co-existence due to specific geographical conditions (e.g. small islands, mountains, small national territory),
– družbenoekonomski razlogi, na primer varstvo specifičnih hribovskih proizvodov in politika ali označbe za kakovost proizvodov,
- Socio-economic grounds such as the protection of specific mountain products, product quality policy or labels,
– širši cilji okoljske politike, na primer posebni habitati, ekosistemi, biotska raznovrstnost, pojav odpornosti in ohranjanje krajinskih značilnosti,
- Wider environmental policy objectives such as specific habitats, ecosystems, biodiversity, emergence of resistance and landscape features preservation,
– upravljanje ozemlja ali načrtovanje rabe zemljišč,
- Territorial management or land use planning,
– drugi upravičeni razlogi v javnem interesu ali ki obravnavajo pomisleke javnosti ter so ustrezno utemeljeni, sorazmerni in nediskriminatorni.
- Other legitimate grounds in the public interest or addressing public concerns, duly justified, proportionate and non-discriminatory,
Poleg tega morajo biti ti ukrepi v skladu s Pogodbama, zlasti glede načela nerazlikovanja med nacionalnimi in tujimi proizvodi , načela sorazmernosti ter členov 34 in 36 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, in z ustreznimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi Unije, zlasti v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji.
Those measures should furthermore be in conformity with the Treaties, in particular as regards the principle of non discrimination between national and non national products , the principle of proportionality and Articles 34 and 36 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as well as with the relevant international obligations of the Union, notably in the context of the World Trade Organisation.
Ukrepi bi morali zagotoviti tudi ustrezno spoštovanje načela svobodne izbire kmetov in potrošnikov.
Those measures should also ensure that the freedom of choice of farmers and consumers is duly respected.
(9) V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti namen te uredbe ni usklajevanje pogojev za gojenje v državah članicah, ampak priznanje svobode državam članicam, da se pri prepovedi gojenja GSO na svojem ozemlju sklicujejo na druge razloge , kot je znanstvena ocena tveganja za okolje in zdravje.
(9) On the basis of the subsidiarity principle, the purpose of this Regulation is not to harmonize the conditions of cultivation in Member States but to grant freedom to Member States to invoke other grounds than scientific assessment of health and environmental risks to ban cultivation of GMOs on their territory.