natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pomorsko načrtovanje naj bi bil osnovni mehanizem za uravnotežen razvoj vseh dejavnosti ICZM, vključno z ribogojstvom.
Marine planning is expected to constitute a basic tool for the balanced development of all ICZM activities, including aquaculture.
Kar zadeva financiranje, bi lahko Evropski sklad za ribištvo pripomogel k povezavi ribogojstva z ICZM, saj omogoča zbiranje kvalitativnih podatkov, da bi tako izdelali načrte ICZM.
As regards funding, the EFF can help link aquaculture with ICZM, since it provides the possibility of collecting qualitative data so as to draw up Integrated Coastal Zone Management Plans.
Poleg tega prednostna os II Evropskega sklada za ribištvo podpira razvoj metod za zmanjšanje vseh vplivov proizvodnje na morsko okolje.
Furthermore, EFF priority axis II supports the development of methods to reduce any impact of production on the marine environment.
Sklepne ugotovitve – pripombe poročevalca
Conclusions - your rapporteur’s comments
Poročevalec meni, da bi politika za celostno upravljanje obalnih območij lahko bila primeren okvir za trajnostni razvoj obalnih območij in uspešen razvoj dejavnosti, ki se izvajajo na teh območjih.
Your rapporteur takes the view that the policy for Integrated Coastal Zone Management may constitute a suitable framework for the sustainable development of coastal zones and the viable development of activities pursued in these zones.
Prav tako vztraja, da bi bilo treba ribolovu in ribogojstvu posvetiti posebno pozornost, saj gre za dejavnosti, ki sta neposredno odvisni od obalnih območij, in poudarja, da bo vključitev regionalnega pomorskega načrtovanja v ICZM prispevala k uravnoteženemu razvoju dejavnosti, ki se na teh območjih izvajajo, kar bo spodbudilo razvoj ribogojstva.
He also maintains that special weight should be given to fishing and aquaculture, since they are activities which are directly dependent on coastal zones and stresses that the integration of marine regional planning in ICZM will contribute to the balanced development of activities pursued there, thereby giving an impetus to the development of aquaculture.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da je potrebno dolgoročno načrtovanje z udeležbo predstavnikov vseh sektorjev z obalnih območij.
Your rapporteur argues firstly that, long-term planning involving representatives of all sectors in coastal zones is needed.
Organi, ki se ukvarjajo z upravljanjem teh območij, morajo biti učinkovito usklajeni.
Secondly, there must be effective coordination of the bodies involved in managing these zones.
Če se bodo tudi pri naslednjem poročilu o oceni izvajanja ICZM pokazale pomanjkljivosti na področju usklajevanja, bi bilo treba ponovno preučiti predlog za ustanovitev organa v ta namen.
In the event that the next assessment report on the implementation of ICZM also finds shortcomings in coordination, the proposal to establish a body for this purpose should be re-examined.
Ti podatki bi morali vključevati tudi podatke o stanju biološke raznovrstnosti na obalnih območjih, vključno z ribolovnimi viri.
These data should also include data on the state of the biodiversity in coastal zones, including fisheries resources.
Informiranje in izmenjave podatkov bi morali potekati tudi na regionalni ravni in s tretjimi državami, saj je regionalno sodelovanje ključnega pomena za obravnavo čezmejnih vprašanj v zvezi z obalnimi območji.
Information and exchanges of data should also take place at regional level and with third countries, since regional cooperation is of key importance for addressing cross-border issues relating to coastal zones.
S finančnega vidika želi poročevalec opozoriti na prispevek Evropskega sklada za ribištvo pri vključevanju ribolova in ribogojstva v ICZM.
From the financial point of view, your rapporteur wishes to stress the contribution of the European Fisheries Fund in including fishing and aquaculture in ICZM.
Na koncu poročevalec meni, da bi morala Komisija po posvetovanju z državami članicami določiti jasen časovni okvir za spremljanje napredka pri izvajanju celostnega upravljanja obalnih območij v Evropski uniji.
Finally, your rapporteur takes the view that, after consulting Member States, the Commission should, after consulting Member States, draw up a clear timetable for examining progress in implementing Integrated Coastal Zone Management in the European Union.
o oceni dublinskega sistema
on the evaluation of the Dublin system
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003 z dne 18. februar 2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države („dublinska uredba“)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national ('the Dublin Regulation')
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2725/2000 z dne 11. decembra 2000 o vzpostavitvi sistema „Eurodac“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe dublinske konvencije
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention
UL L 316, 15.12.2000, str.
OJ L 316, 15.12.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite
– having regard to Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted
18. („direktiva o sprejemu“),
18. ('the Reception Directive'),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 862/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o statistikah Skupnosti o selitvah in mednarodni zaščiti ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 311/76 o zbiranju statističnih podatkov o tujih delavcih
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on Community statistics on migration and international protection and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 311/76 on the compilation of statistics on foreign workers
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o dostopu policijskih organov in organov kazenskega pregona držav članic ter Europola
– having regard to the Council Conclusions on access to Eurodac by Member States’ police and law enforcement authorities as well as Europol
2807. zasedanje Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve v Luksemburgu, 12. in 13. junij 2007. do sistema Eurodac,
2807th Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting in Luxembourg, 12 and 13 June 2007. ,
– ob upoštevanju Odločbe št. 573/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 v okviru splošnega programa Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov in razveljavitvi Odločbe Sveta 2004/904/ES
– having regard to Decision No 573/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows and repealing Council Decision 2004/904/EC
UL L 144, 6.6.2007, str.
OJ L 144, 6.6.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2006 o položaju beguncev na Malti
– having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2006 on the situation with refugee camps in Malta
– ob upoštevanju svojih poročil o obiskih odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve v centrih za pridržanje v več državah članicah,
– having regard to its reports on the visits by its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs to detention centres in several Member States,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. junija 2007 o azilu: sodelovanje v praksi in kakovost odločanja na področju skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema
– having regard to its resolution of 21 June 2007 on asylum: practical cooperation, quality of decision-making in the common European asylum system
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2007)0286 . ,
Texts adopted , P6_TA(2007)0286 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. januarja 2008: Strategiji EU o otrokovih pravicah naproti
– having regard to its resolution of 16 January 2008: Towards an EU strategy on the rights of the child
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2008)0012 . ,
Texts adopted , P6_TA(2008)0012 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. marca 2008 o primeru iranskega državljana Sejeda Mehdija Kazemija
– having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2008 on the case of the Iranian citizen Seyed Mehdi Kazemi
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2008)0107 . ,
Texts adopted , P6_TA(2008)0107 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0287/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0287/2008 ),
A. ker ima vsak prosilec za azil pravico, da se njegova prošnja preuči posamično in temeljito,
A. whereas every asylum seeker is entitled to a full, individual examination of his or her claim,
B. ker se zakonodaja o azilu in praksa v posameznih državah še vedno zelo razlikujeta in so zaradi tega prosilci za azil v posameznih državah članicah v okviru dublinskega sistema različno obravnavani,
B. whereas asylum legislation and practice still vary widely from country to country and that, as a result, asylum-seekers receive different treatment from one Dublin State to another,
C. ker dublinski sistem temelji na vzajemnem zaupanju in zanesljivosti in ker je zaradi neizpolnjenosti teh pogojev, tj. v primeru resnih pomanjkljivosti pri zbiranju podatkov in neskladnosti v procesu odločanja v določenih državah članicah, ogrožen celoten sistem,
C. whereas the Dublin system is rooted in such premises as mutual trust and reliability and that if these prerequisites are not fulfilled, i.e. if there are serious gaps in data collection or inconsistencies in the decision-making process in certain Member States, the whole system suffers,
D. ker obstajajo dokazi, da nekatere države članice ne zagotavljajo dejanskega dostopa do postopka za določanje statusa begunca,
D. whereas there is evidence that some Member States do not guarantee effective access to a procedure for determining refugee status,
E. ker nekatere države članice direktive o sprejemu ne uporabljajo učinkovito ne za prosilce za azil, ki čakajo na predajo v drugo državo v skladu z dublinsko uredbo, ne ob njihovi vrnitvi v odgovorno državo članico,
E. whereas some Member States do not apply the Reception Directive effectively, either to asylum applicants awaiting transfer to another Member State under the Dublin Regulation, or at the point of return to the Member State responsible,
F. ker nekatere države članice sistematično pridržujejo osebe, ki spadajo pod dublinski sistem,
F. whereas some Member States systematically place persons subject to the Dublin system in detention,
G. ker visoko število večkrat vloženih prošenj in nizko število opravljenih predaj kažeta na pomanjkljivost dublinskega sistema in nujno potrebo po vzpostavitvi skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema,
G. whereas the high level of multiple requests and the low level of effected transfers are indicators of the deficiencies of the Dublin system and of the need to establish a common European asylum system,
H. ker lahko pravilno izvajanje dublinske uredbe povzroči neenakomerno porazdelitev odgovornosti za osebe, ki iščejo zaščito, v škodo nekaterih držav članic, ki so zaradi geografske lege zlasti izpostavljene migracijskim tokovom,
H. whereas a correct implementation of the Dublin Regulation may well result in the unequal distribution of responsibility for persons seeking protection, to the detriment of some Member States particularly exposed to migration flows simply on the grounds of their geographical location,
I. ker ocena Komisije kaže, da je moralo leta 2005 13 držav članic na zunanjih mejah Unije obravnavati vedno večje izzive, ki so posledica dublinskega sistema,
I. whereas the Commission's evaluation reveals that, in 2005, the thirteen Member States at the borders of the Union had to deal with increasing challenges raised by the Dublin system,
J. ker morajo južne države članice sprejemati prošnje za azil nezakonitih priseljencev, ki jih rešijo, ko na poti v Evropo zaidejo v težave,
J. whereas southern Member States are having to accept asylum applications from irregular immigrants who are rescued when in distress whilst they are on their way to Europe,
K. ker morajo južne države članice sprejemati prošnje za azil nezakonitih priseljencev, katerim tretje države ne zagotavljajo pomoči, čeprav so temu zavezane v skladu z mednarodnim pravom,
K. whereas southern Member States are having to accept asylum applications from irregular immigrants who are not assisted by third countries which are obliged to provide such assistance under international law,
L. ker morda izpolnjevanje obveznosti glede evidentiranja nezakonitih priseljencev v zbirko podatkov Eurodac ni v interesu držav članic, ker se zaradi tega lahko poveča število prošenj za azil, ki jih bodo morale obravnavati,
L. whereas Member States may have no interest in complying with the obligation of registering illegal entrants in the Eurodac database, as this may result in increasing the number of applications for asylum which they will have to deal with,
M. ker dublinska uredba uvaja sistem, ki je namenjen določitvi države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, vendar na začetku ni bil vzpostavljen kot mehanizem za porazdelitev bremena, zato tudi temu ne služi,
M. whereas the Dublin Regulation establishes a system which is designed to determine the Member State responsible for dealing with a claim, but it was not originally put in place for, and therefore fails to serve as, a burden-sharing mechanism,
N. ker mora kakršna koli ocena dublinskega sistema vključevati konkreten, trajen, pravičen in funkcionalen mehanizem za porazdelitev bremena,
N. whereas it is essential that any evaluation of the Dublin system is accompanied by a concrete, permanent, fair and functional burden-sharing mechanism,
O. ker je načelo države prvega vstopa v okviru dublinskega sistema zelo pritiskalo na države članice na zunanjih mejah,
O. whereas the Dublin system's first-country-of-entry criteria put a lot of pressure on the border Member States,
P. ker se v posameznih državah članicah stopnje priznavanja kandidatov za status begunca za nekatere državljane tretjih držav razlikujejo od približno 0 % do 90 %,
P. whereas recognition rates of candidates for refugee status vary for certain third-country nationals from approximately 0% to 90% within Member States,
Q. ker je bistveno, da so posamezniki, ki vlagajo prošnje, v celoti seznanjeni z dublinskim postopkom in njegovimi možnimi posledicami v jeziku, ki ga razumejo,
Q. whereas it is essential that individuals lodging claims are fully apprised of the Dublin process, in a language which they understand, and its possible consequences,
R. ker člen 24 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah določa, da morajo javni organi ali zasebne ustanove pri ukrepanju v zvezi z otroki vedno upoštevati predvsem koristi otroka,
R. whereas Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states that in all actions relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the child's best interests must be a primary consideration,
S. ker čeprav dublinska uredba kot prvo merilo, ki ga je treba uporabiti, navaja enotnost družine, se ta določba pogosto ne uporablja,
S. whereas although family unity is mentioned first in the hierarchy of criteria applied in the Dublin Regulation, that provision is not often applied,
T. ker so statistični podatki o predajah očitno pomanjkljivi, saj na primer ne vključujejo informacij o številu zahtev za sprejema prosilca za azil zaradi nezakonitega prehoda meje, ali deleža 'sprejemov' v primerjavi z deležem 'ponovnih sprejemov',
T. whereas there is an obvious lack of accuracy in statistical data on transfers, as they do not indicate, for instance, the rate of requests for taking charge of an asylum applicant based on an irregular crossing of the border, or the proportion of 'taking charge' versus 'taking back' requests,
U. ker je leta 2005 devet od novih držav članic objavilo, da so zabeležile več predaj v državo v okviru izvajanja dublinske uredbe, in ker so države članice, ki nimajo zunanje kopenske meje Unije, objavile, da so zabeležile več predaj iz države,
U. whereas in 2005 nine of the new Member States stated that they were registering more ‘incoming’ transfers under the Dublin Regulation and Member States with no external land border of the Union stated that they were registering more ‘outgoing’ transfers,
V. ker Komisija ni uspela oceniti stroškov sistema in je ta podatek pomemben, da se lahko oceni njegovo učinkovitost,
V. whereas the Commission has been unable to evaluate the cost of the system and whereas that information is important to be able to assess its effectiveness,
W. ker je Svet za pravosodje in notranje zadeve na zasedanju v Luksemburgu 12. in 13. junija 2007 Komisijo pozval, da čim prej predloži predlog spremembe k uredbi Eurodac, da se policijskim organom in organom kazenskega pregona držav članic ter Europolu pod določenimi pogoji omogoči dostop do zbirke podatkov Eurodac, ki je bila prvotno vzpostavljena kot orodje za izvajanje dublinske uredbe,
W. whereas the Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting in Luxembourg on 12 and 13 June 2007 invited the Commission to present as soon as possible an amendment to the Eurodac Regulation with the aim of enabling Member States' police and law-enforcement authorities, as well as Europol, to have access under certain conditions to Eurodac, a database which was conceived originally as a tool for implementing the Dublin Regulation,
Učinkovitost sistema in porazdelitev odgovornosti
Eff iciency of the system and responsibility sharing
5. poziva Komisijo, da predloži predloge za uvedbo mehanizmov za porazdelitev bremena, ki lahko pomagajo ublažiti nesorazmerno obremenitev določenih držav članic, zlasti držav članic na zunanjih mejah, vendar ne sodijo v dublinski sistem;
Asks the Commission to bring forward proposals for burden-sharing mechanisms which could be put in place in order to help alleviate the disproportionate load which could fall on certain Member States, in particular the border Member States , but do not fit into the Dublin system;
8. poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi pomembne dvostranske delovne odnose s tretjimi državami, kot je Libija, da se olajša sodelovanje in zagotovi izpolnjevanje mednarodnih zakonskih obveznosti s strani teh tretjih držav;
Calls upon the Commission to establish meaningful bilateral working relations with third countries such as Libya, in order to facilitate cooperation and ensure that such third countries meet their international legal obligations;
10. poziva Komisijo, da spremeni člena 19 in 20 dublinske uredbe v zvezi s sprejemom in ponovnim sprejemom tako, da se prosilcem zagotovi avtomatična pravica do pritožbe z odložilnim učinkom zoper odločitev o prenosu odgovornosti na drugo državo v skladu z dublinsko uredbo;
Asks the Commission to amend Articles 19 and 20 of the Dublin Regulation on 'taking charge and taking back', so as to provide applicants with an automatic suspensory right of appeal against a decision to transfer responsibility to another Member State under the Dublin Regulation;
Ponovna združitev družine in načelo največje koristi otroka
Family reunification and the principle of the best interest of the child
17. pozdravlja namen Komisije, da razširi obseg uporabe dublinske uredbe na subsidiarno zaščito ter s tem omogočila prosilcem za subsidiarno zaščito, da se ponovno združijo z družinskimi člani, ki jim je bila tovrstna zaščita odobrena ali so zaprosili zanjo v drugi državi članici;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to extend the scope of the Dublin Regulation to include subsidiary protection, as this should enable applicants for subsidiary protection to be reunited with family members who were granted this type of protection or are asking for it in another Member State;
20. meni, da humanitarna določba iz člena 15 dublinske uredbe dublinskemu sistemu zagotavlja znatno prožnost, vendar jo je treba uporabljati širše, da družine ne bi trpele zaradi ločenosti;
Considers that the humanitarian clause contained in Article 15 of the Dublin Regulation gives considerable flexibility to the Dublin system, but that it should be applied more widely, so as to avoid undue hardship to families as a result of separation;
23. pozdravlja namen Komisije, da se podrobneje opredelijo okoliščine in postopki za uporabo določbe o prenosu suverenosti, zlasti zato, da se uvede zahteva o soglašanju prosilca za azil;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to better specify the circumstances and procedures for applying the Sovereignty clause, notably in order to introduce the condition of the asylum-seeker's consent;
Zbiranje podatkov in Eurodac
Data-collection and Eurodac
28. poudarja, da obstaja nevarnost, da bi se z razširitvijo dostopa do sistema Eurodac za policijske organe in organe kazenskega pregona ter Europol informacije posredovale tretjim državam, kar bi lahko imelo negativne posledice za prosilce za azil in njihove družine; je prepričan, da bi se s tem povečalo tveganje za zaznamovanost prosilcev za azil;
Stresses that extending access to the Eurodac database to Member States' police and law-enforcement authorities as well as Europol entails the risk that information may pass to third countries, which could have negative repercussions for asylum seekers and their families; is convinced that this would also increase the risk of asylum seekers being stigmatised;
Izpostavitev glavnih določb iz uredbe Dublin II
R eminder of the main provisions laid down in the Dublin I I Regulation
Svet je 18. februarja 2003 sprejel Uredbo (ES) št. 343/2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, skupaj z njeno izvedbeno uredbo
On 18 February 2003 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application, which – together with its implementing regulation
Uredba (ES) št. 1560/2003 Komisije z dne 2. septembra 2003, UL L 222, 5.9.2003. in uredbo „EURODAC“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 of 2 September 2003, OJ L 222, 5.9.2003. and the Eurodac regulation
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2725/2000 z dne 11. decembra 2000 o vzpostavitvi sistema „Eurodac“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Dublinske konvencije. , tj. dublinski sistem.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention. – constitutes the 'Dublin system'.
Ta sistem se zdaj uporablja v 27 državah članicah ter na Norveškem in v Islandiji ter se bo kmalu uporabljal tudi v Švici in Lihtenštajnu.
This system currently applies to the 27 Member States and to Norway and Iceland, and it is soon to be extended to Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
Namen tega sistema, s katerim naj bi se zagotovilo, da je vedno neka država članica (le ena) odgovorna za obravnavanje prošenj, je zlasti preprečiti pojav „tavajočih beguncev“, sekundarnega preseljevanja in večkratnih prošenj (kar skupaj imenujemo „izbiranje države azila“).
The system (which is supposed to ensure that there is always one Member State – and one only – responsible for considering any given application) is designed in particular to curb the phenomenon of 'refugees in orbit', secondary migration and multiple applications (what is commonly known as 'asylum-shopping').
Temelji na hierarhiji meril (poglavje III), ki so:
It is based upon the following hierarchy of criteria (Chapter III):