natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
11. opozarja na obstoječe možnosti kombiniranega financiranja; vendar poudarja, da mešano financiranje med strukturnimi skladi in okvirnimi programi ni dovoljeno; poudarja, da je mogoče instrumente kombinirati, da krijejo dopolnjujoče se, vendar ločene dejavnosti, denimo pri raziskovalni infrastrukturi, ali zaporedne dele sorodnih projektov, kot je razvoj nove raziskovalne ideje in dejavnosti v nadaljevanju, ter tudi projekte v istem omrežju ali grozdu;
Notes the existing possibilities of combined funding; stresses, however, that mixed financing is not allowed between Structural Funds and the framework programmes; stresses that the instruments can be combined to cover either complementary but separate activities, as in the case of research infrastructure, or consecutive parts of related projects, such as the development and follow-up of a new research idea, as well as projects within the same network or cluster;
18. poudarja pomen analiziranja, izmenjave in povezovanja najboljše prakse o sinergijah med instrumenti politike; v zvezi s tem odobrava prizadevanja Komisije za izboljšanje sodelovanja med oddelki ter jo poziva, naj okrepi analizo raziskovalnih in inovacijskih možnosti in potreb na regionalni ravni, zlasti glede zbiranja razpoložljivih kvalitativnih podatkov ter analizo medsebojnih odnosov z drugimi instrumenti v ocenjevalni študiji katerega koli od treh instrumentov financiranja, da bi zagotovili skupne smernice;
Highlights the importance of analysing, sharing and integrating best practices concerning synergies between the policy instruments; in this context, welcomes the efforts made by the Commission to improve inter-departmental cooperation and calls on it to step up regional-level analysis of research and innovation potential and needs, in particular as regards the collection of available qualitative data, as well as analysis of the interrelations with other instruments in the evaluation studies on either of the three financing instruments, in order to be able to provide joint guidance;
22. spodbuja Komisijo, naj nadaljuje svoje dejavnosti za spodbujanje sinergije ter Evropski parlament obvešča o njihovem napredku, zlasti o vertikalnem sodelovanju med EU ter nacionalnimi in regionalnimi subjekti;
Encourages the Commission to continue its activities aimed at fostering synergy, and to keep the European Parliament informed on their evolution, particularly on the situation of vertical cooperation between the EU and national and regional entities;
Priporočila glede naslednjega programskega obdobja
Recommendations with a view to the next programming period
27. podpira tri vodilne pobude strategije EU 2020 za doseganje pametne rasti: „Unija inovacij“, „Mladi in mobilnost“ in „Evropski program za digitalne tehnologije“, pri izvajanju katerih bodo igrali ključno vlogo strukturni skladi;
Supports the three flagship initiatives of the EU 2020 Strategy for achieving intelligent growth, namely ‘Innovation Union’, ‘Youth on the move’ and ‘A digital agenda for Europe’, in whose implementation the Structural Funds will have a key role to play;
30 meni, da so strukturni skladi primeren instrument za podpiranje lokalnih in regionalnih organov pri njihovem prizadevanju za spodbujanje domiselnosti in inovativnosti; poudarja potrebo po večji prilagodljivosti, da bi zagotovili hitro uporabo teh finančnih sredstev za spodbujanje inovativnih podjetniških pobud; v zvezi s tem poudarja dodano vrednost kohezijske politike, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja v širokem obsegu, saj nudi lahko dostopno podporo in zagotavlja boljši dostop do uporabnih raziskav, prenosa tehnologije in inovacij;
30 Considers that the Structural Funds are the appropriate instrument for supporting local and regional authorities in their endeavours to promote creativity and innovation; underlines the need for greater flexibility to ensure the swift use of this funding for purposes of promoting innovative business initiatives; underlines in this context the added value of cohesion policy, particularly to small and medium-sized enterprises on a wide scale, by offering easily accessible support and providing improved access to research and the transfer of technology and innovation, oriented towards practical application;
34. poudarja, da so raziskave in inovacije, zlasti za doseganje nizkih ali ničnih emisij ogljika ter prihranek energije, zelo pomembne za spoprijemanje z globalnimi izzivi, kot so podnebne spremembe in zanesljiva oskrba z energijo, pa tudi za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti na regionalni in lokalni ravni;
Points out that research and innovation, in particular as regards the development of low or zero carbon emissions and energy savings, are of critical importance for addressing global challenges, such as climate change and security of energy supplies, and also for improving competitiveness at regional and local level;
38. poziva Komisijo, naj analizira vpliv že sprejetih poenostavitvenih ukrepov za upravljanje strukturnih skladov, da bi bilo mogoče pripraviti prihodnji zakonodajni okvir;
Calls on the Commission to analyse the impact of simplification measures already taken on the management of the Structural Funds with a view to preparing the future legislative framework;
41. ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj razvije posebna merila ocenjevanja za inovativne projekte ter premisli o tem, da bi predlagala prihodnje ureditvene pobude za uresničevanje inovativnih ukrepov;
Reiterates its call on the Commission to develop specific evaluation criteria for the assessment of innovative projects, and to consider proposing future regulatory incentives for implementing innovation measures;
43 vztraja, da je treba upoštevati enake možnosti pri ocenjevanju primernosti projektov in določanju dostopa do financiranja iz strukturnih skladov in drugih instrumentov Skupnosti;
43 Insists on the importance of taking account of equal opportunities when assessing the suitability of projects and determining access to funding from the Structural Funds and other Community instruments;
45. meni, da mora velike raziskovalne infrastrukture, ki jih sofinancirajo strukturni skladi, podrobneje oceniti mednarodni organ za medsebojni pregled, kar bo pozitivno vplivalo na učinkovito porabo namenskih strukturnih skladov;
Believes that large research infrastructures cofinanced by Structural Funds should be subject to a higher evaluation by an international peer review board, which will have a positive effect on the efficient spending of earmarked Structural Funds;
47. znova poudarja, da bi bilo treba neformalne mehanizme, ki urejajo teritorialno kohezijo in prostorsko načrtovanje v Svetu, zamenjati z bolj formalnimi strukturami; zavzema stališče, da bo razvoj, ki ga spremlja ustvarjanje in krepitev povezanih in medsektorskih struktur, pripeljal do boljšega usklajevanja politik;
Reiterates that the informal mechanisms governing territorial cohesion and spatial planning in the Council should be replaced by more formal structures; takes the view that this development accompanied by the creation and reinforcement of integrated and cross-theme structures will result in a better coordination of policies;
Vsak parlamentarni odbor lahko sestavi tako imenovano poročilo o izvajanju, to je poročilo o prenosu zakonodaje EU v nacionalno zakonodajo ter njenem izvajanju in izvrševanju v državah članicah.
Each parliamentary committee may draw up an implementation report, which is a report on the transposition of EU legislation into national law and the implementation and enforcement thereof in Member States.
V primeru kohezijske politike sestavljajo zakonodajni okvir uredbe, ki se uporabljajo neposredno, izvedbene ukrepe zanje pa zagotavljajo uredba Komisije in odločbe Komisije, ki se ne posredujejo v Parlament.
In the case of cohesion policy the legislative framework consists of directly applicable regulations, the implementation measures of which are covered by a Commission regulation and Commission decisions which are not submitted to Parliament.
Odbor za regionalni razvoj je presodil, naj v kontekstu trenutne razprave o prihodnosti kohezijske politike poročilo o izvajanju vključuje analizo, ali države članice pravilno uporabljajo zakonodajo.
The Committee on Regional Development took the view that in the context of the unfolding debate on the future of cohesion policy a report on the implementation should analyse whether legislation has been properly applied by the Member States.
Samoiniciativno poročilo ima dvojni cilj. prvič, analizira, kako so države članice in regije spoštovale orientacijski okvir Strateških smernic Skupnosti 2007–2013 in še posebej smernico 1.2 o izboljšanju znanja in inovativnosti za rast v nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirjih (NSRO) in operativnih programih.
The own-initiative report has a two-fold aim: first, it analyses how the indicative framework of the Community Strategic Guidelines 2007-2013, and in particular the Guideline 1.2 on Improving Knowledge and Innovation for Growth, was followed by the Member States and Regions in their National Strategic Reference Frameworks (NSRF's) and Operational Programs.
Drugič, poročilo analizira sinergije med kohezijsko, raziskovalno in inovacijsko politiko ter njihovimi instrumenti (strukturni skladi, Sedmi okvirni program za RTR in Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost).
Second, the report analyses the synergies between cohesion, research and innovation policies and their instruments (Structural Funds, Seventh Framework programme for RTD and Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme).
Omeniti je treba, da je obseg poročila omejen, ker je bilo sestavljeno na začetku leta 2010 pred objavo strateškega poročila Komisije.
It has to be noted, that the report is limited in its scope since it was drawn up in the beginning of 2010 before the publication of the Commission’s Strategic Report.
Evropski, nacionalni in regionalni programi financiranja ostajajo včasih neusklajeni.
EU, national and regional funding schemes sometimes remain uncoordinated.
Vendar pa je treba upoštevati, da tako kohezijska politika EU kot tudi politike na področju raziskav in razvoja ter inovacij služijo istemu namenu, in sicer soočanju s ključnimi izzivi Evropske unije in ohranjanju modela EU, ki temelji na gospodarski rasti, družbeni odgovornosti in trajnostnem razvoju.
However, it has to be noted that both EU cohesion policy and R&D and Innovation policies serve the same cause: addressing major challenges of the European Union and upholding an EU model based on economic growth, social responsibility and sustainable development.
Spodbujanje trajnostne gospodarske rasti in ustvarjanja novih delovnih mest je čedalje bolj odvisno od zmožnosti regionalnih gospodarstev za inovacije, v luči svetovne gospodarske krize pa je ta vidik postal še pomembnejši, kar potrjuje tudi vloga kohezijske politike v evropskem načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva.
Fostering sustainable economic growth and job creation is more and more dependant on the capacity of regional economies to innovate and in the context of the global economic crisis this aspect became even more important, also confirmed by the role given to cohesion policy in the European Economic Recovery Plan.
Na evropski ravni je jasno, da so za pospešitev prestrukturiranja in naložb ter ustvarjanje novih poslovnih priložnosti nujno potrebne politike, ki krepijo konkurenčnost in inovativnost.
It is clear at the European level that policies which enhance competitiveness and innovation are urgently needed to speed up restructuring and investment and to create new business opportunities.
Poleg tega mora Parlament predstaviti svoj pogled v razpravi o prihodnosti kohezijske politike.
Furthermore, Parliament needs to present its point of view in the discussion on the future of cohesion policy.
Razpravljati mora o možnih izboljšavah na podlagi ocen.
It has to discuss the possible improvements on the basis of evaluation.
Kohezijska politika ima vse od začetka tega programskega obdobja tri prednostne naloge; ena od njih je spodbujanje inovativnosti, podjetništva in rasti gospodarstva znanja z raziskovalnimi in inovacijskimi zmogljivostmi, vključno z novimi informacijskimi in komunikacijskimi tehnologijami.
Since the very beginning of the current programming period, cohesion policy seeks to target three priorities, one of them being encouraging innovation, entrepreneurship and the growth of the knowledge economy, by research and innovation capacities, including new information and communication technologies.
Raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije lahko Evropski uniji pomagajo pri doseganju ciljev rasti.
R&D and innovation can help the European Union to achieve its growth objectives.
Zato je kohezijska politika usmerjena v vlaganja, ki krepijo dolgoročno konkurenčnost EU, na primer podjetništvo, dostop do financiranja za mala in srednja podjetja, človeški kapital, informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije, zelene tehnologije ter energijsko učinkovitost.
That is why cohesion policy also targets investments that strengthen the long term competitiveness of the EU, such as entrepreneurship, access to finance for SMEs, human capital, ICT, green technology and energy efficiency.
Tako so se za obdobje od 2007 do 2013 dodeljena finančna sredstva znotraj kohezijske politike EU za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije potrojila v primerjavi s prejšnjim programskim obdobjem, saj je bilo za te vrste izdatkov namenjenih več kot 85 milijard EUR (skoraj 25 % skupnega zneska), skupaj z vključevanjem
Consequently, between 2007 and 2013, EU cohesion policy tripled its financial allocation to R&D and innovation compared to the previous programming period, earmarking more than €85 billion (almost 25% of the total) to these categories of expenditure, including the mainstreaming of
inovativnih ukrepov in eksperimentov.
innovative actions and experimentation.
Od tega skupnega zneska:
Out of this total,
· je bilo 50,5 milijarde EUR dodeljenih razvoju in raziskavam ter inovacijam v ožjem smislu ,
· €50.5 billion was allocated to R&D and innovation in the narrow sense,
· 8,3 milijarde EUR podjetništvu ,
· €8.3 billion to entrepreneurship ,
· 13,2 milijarde EUR inovativnim informacijskim in komunikacijskim tehnologijam za spodbujanje povpraševanja po IKT ,
· €13.2 billion to innovative information and communication technologies to foster the demand side of ICT,
· 14,5 milijarde EUR človeškemu kapitalu .
· €14.5 billion to human capital.
Učinkovita analiza postopka izvajanja 246 nacionalnih ali regionalnih operativnih programov, v katerih so inovacije pomembna sestavina, je pravzaprav nemogoča do objave strateškega poročila Evropske komisije: spodbujanje razprave EU o koheziji (najverjetneje aprila 2010).
An effective analysis of the implementation process of the 246 national or regional Operational Programmes, within which innovation is a relevant component, is not really possible until the publication by the European Commission (most probably in April 2010) of the Strategic Report: promoting an EU debate on cohesion.
Poročilo bo opredelilo tudi primere dobre prakse v državah članicah.
The report will also identify examples of good practices in the Member States.
Zaradi kompleksnosti današnjih izzivov za EU je potrebna kombinacija politik, da se okrepi vpliv posameznih politik in poveča učinkovitost pri porabi razpoložljivih sredstev.
The complexity of the challenges the EU faces today calls for an integrated mix of policies; so as to reinforce the impact of individual policies and increase efficiency in spending available resources.
Strateške smernice Skupnosti potrjujejo, da je sinergija med kohezijsko politiko in okvirnimi programi nujna, in dodajajo, da mora kohezijska politika v zvezi s tem igrati dve vlogi: omogočanje izvajanja regionalnih inovacijskih strategij in akcijskih načrtov ter prispevanje k izgradnji inovacijskih in raziskovalnih zmogljivosti v regijah.
The Community Strategic Guidelines confirm that synergy between cohesion policy and framework programmes is essential and add that in this context cohesion policy has two roles to play: facilitating the implementation of regional innovation strategies and action plans; and contributing to building up innovation and research capacity in the regions.
Med splošnimi ugotovitvami analize zdajšnje strukture instrumentov kohezijske, raziskovalne in inovacijske politike je treba navesti, da nekateri elementi, denimo isti časovni okvir in usklajenost z lizbonsko strategijo, omogočajo sinergijo.
As a general conclusion of the analysis of the current architecture of cohesion, research and innovation policy instruments, it has to be noted, that some elements, such as the same time frame and alignment with the Lisbon agenda allow for synergies.
Vendar še vedno obstajajo pomembne razlike, denimo različna pravna podlaga ter vključenost različnih upravnih ravni in organov v postopek izvajanja.
However, there are still significant differences, such as different legal basis, and the involvement of different administrative levels and authorities in the implementation process.
Te razlike onemogočajo, da bi bili upravičenci seznanjeni z različnimi možnostmi financiranja.
These differences make it difficult for beneficiaries to be well informed about the diverse funding opportunities.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da se organi, ki sodelujejo pri upravljanju sedmega okvirnega programa, programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost ter strukturnih skladov, zavedajo možnosti, ki jih ponuja vsak od teh instrumentov.
In this respect, it would be necessary to ensure that bodies involved in managing FP7, CIP and the Structural Funds are aware of the possibilities offered by each of these instruments.
Čeprav sinergije med politikami presegajo financiranje dopolnjujočih se projektov, se je nujno zavedati možnosti kombiniranja obstoječih instrumentov.
Even though synergies between policies go beyond complementary project funding, it is important to understand the possibilities to combine existing instruments.
V zvezi s tem poročevalec odobrava nastanek Praktičnih navodil glede možnosti financiranja raziskav in inovacij v EU.
In this respect the Rapporteur welcomes the creation of the Practical Guide to EU funding opportunities for Research and Innovation.
Ta navodila navajajo nekaj zanimivih primerov kombiniranja različnih instrumentov.
This guide gives some interesting examples of combining the different instruments.
Skladno s členom 54(5) splošne uredbe izdatek, ki ga sofinancirajo skladi, ne prejema pomoči od nobenega drugega finančnega instrumenta Skupnosti, torej je mešano financiranje prepovedano.
According to Article 54(5) of the General Regulation an expenditure co-financed by the Funds cannot receive further co-financing from another Community instrument, thus mixed financing is prohibited.
Vendar pa obstaja možnost za kombiniranje instrumentov v podporo: dopolnjujočih se, vendar ločenih dejavnosti (npr. razvoj večjih razvojnih infrastruktur, pri katerem sedmi okvirni program krije pripravljalno fazo, strukturni skladi pa gradbena dela), zaporednih delov sorodnih projektov (npr. različne faze razvoja tehnologije skozi čas: temeljne raziskave, uporabne raziskave, prikazi ali predkonkurenčna uvedba na trg) ali projektov v istem omrežju ali grozdu .
There is however the possibility to combine the instruments to support: complementary but separate activities (e.g. developing major research infrastructures, with FP7 covering the preparatory phase and construction works covered by Structural Funds), consecutive parts of related projects (e.g. different phases of the development of a technology over time: basic research, applied research, demonstration or pre-competitive market introduction) or projects within the same network/cluster.
Navsezadnje je treba omeniti, da morajo poleg oblikovanja navodil vse ravni, regionalna, nacionalna in EU, okrepiti in uskladiti svoja prizadevanja za izboljšanje komunikacije ter izmenjavo najboljše prakse tako znotraj svojih organov (ministrstev, generalnih direktoratov) ter s potencialnimi upravičenci.
Finally, it has to be noted that besides creating guidance notes, all levels, regional, national and EU have to step up and coordinate their efforts to improve communication and to share best practices both within their respective bodies (ministries, directorate generals) and towards potential beneficiaries.
Sklepi in prva priporočila poročevalca
Reflections and first recommendations of the Rapporteur
Priporočila poročevalca se po eni strani usmerjajo na strateške cilje, po drugi pa na konkretne cilje in ukrepe za večjo sinergijo med kohezijsko, raziskovalno in inovacijsko politiko.
The Rapporteur's recommendations are focusing on one hand on strategic goals, on the other hand on concrete objectives and actions with a view to enhance synergy between cohesion, research and innovation policy.
V predvideni reviziji finančnega okvira in trenutni razpravi o prihodnosti kohezijske politike je zelo pomemben osnutek strategije EU 2020, ki ga je predlagala Komisija.
In the upcoming review of the financial framework and the unfolding discussion on the future of cohesion policy, the draft EU2020 Strategy proposed by the Commission proved to be of major importance.
Predlagana strategija ni bila podrobno analizirana, poročevalec se je skliceval samo na vidike, pomembne za obseg tega poročila o izvajanju.
No detailed analysis was made of the proposed EU2020 strategy, the rapportuer only made references to aspects relevant for the scope of the present implementation report.
Kot pozitivno se ocenjuje, da osnutek poudarja soodvisnost med politikami ter potrebo po boljših sinergijah in močnejšem partnerstvu pri zasnovi in izvajanju javnih politik.
It is assessed as a positive element that the draft puts emphasis on the interdependence between policies and the need for better synergies and stronger partnership in the design and delivery of public policies.
Treba je omeniti, da so potrebo po boljšem usklajevanju politik na terenu jasno izrazili tudi številne regije in regionalni akterji v Evropi.
It is important to note, that the necessity to better coordinate policies on the ground is also a clear message formulated by many regions, regional actors in Europe.
Poročevalec meni, da je regionalna politika močno prispevala in še prispeva k odgovoru na osrednje izzive EU: zmanjšanje strukturnih razlik med regijami, izboljšanje konkurenčnosti EU, izravnava posledic svetovne gospodarske krize, omejevanje posledic demografskih ali podnebnih sprememb.
The Rapporteur takes the view that regional policy had and has a major contribution in responding to central EU challenges: reducing structural disparities between regions, improving EU competitiveness, counterbalancing the effects of the global economic crisis, limiting the impact of demographic or climate change.
Zato je trdna in finančno dobro podprta politika nujen pogoj za dosego ciljev EU do leta 2020 ter za spodbujanje ciljev socialne, ekonomske in teritorialne kohezije.
For these reasons, a strong and well financed policy is considered to be a pre-requisite for the achievement of the EU 2020 goals and for promoting the objectives of social, economic and territorial cohesion.
Čeprav poročevalec s tem poročilom ni nameraval predlagati opredelitve ali razviti razprave o pojmu teritorialne kohezije, vseeno poudarja, da se poročilo usmerja tudi na usklajevanje politik, ki imajo pomemben teritorialni vpliv, da bi v celoti izkoristili regionalni potencial ter povečali njihov vpliv na terenu.
Without aiming to propose a definition or to develop a debate in the context of this report on the concept of territorial cohesion, Your Rapprteur highlights that it also targets the coordination of policies that have an important territorial impact, in order to fully use the regional potential and increase their impact on the ground.
Zato bi bilo v prizadevanjih za dosego bolj usklajenega, trajnostnega teritorialnega razvoja v Evropski uniji treba preučiti in izkoristiti potencial „koncentracije, povezovanja in sodelovanja“ kot koordinat teritorialne kohezije.
Therefore, the potential of "concentration, cooperation, connection", as coordinates of territorial cohesion, should be considered and exploited in the efforts to reach a more balanced, sustainable territorial development within the European Union.