natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glede na nedavne poskuse, da bi se precejšnji zneski iz proračunske postavke 2 prenesli v proračunsko postavko 4, pripravljavec mnenja predlaga dve spremembi, ki opozarjata na določbe medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju.
In the context of recent attempts to shift significant amounts from Heading 2 to Heading 4, your draftsman proposes two amendments reminding provisions of the Inter-institutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and sound financial management.
Pripravljavec mnenja glede besedila podpira predlog Komisije, da se sistem modulacije ne sme uporabljati za kmete v novih državah članicah, dokler raven neposrednih plačil, ki se uporabljajo v teh državah članicah, ne bo enaka ravni, ki se uporablja v drugih državah članicah.
Concerning the text itself, your draftsman supports the Commission's proposal that the system of modulation should not be applied to farmers in the new Member States until the level of direct payments applicable in those Member States is equal to the level applicable in the other Member States.
Poročevalec iz pristojnega odbora prav tako podpira to zamisel in zato spreminja člena 7 in 10 nove uredbe.
The Rapporteur in the lead committee also supports this idea and therefore is modifying Article 7 and 10 of the new regulation.
Upati je, da bo s tem prag za enakost plačil v starih in novih državah članicah dosežen šele leta 2013, ne pa – kot je predlagala Komisija – bolj zgodaj (zaradi nove sheme modulacije).
By doing so it is to hope that the threshold of equality of payments in old and new Member States will arrive only in 2013, not as proposed by the Commission, earlier (because of the new modulation scheme).
Te predlagane spremembe predloga (predlogi sprememb AGRI 28–42) se lahko podprejo, vendar ni potrebno, da so predmet predlogov sprememb Odbora za proračun.
These proposed changes to the proposal, (AGRI amendments 28 - 42) can be endorsed, but do not have to be subject of amendments in the Budgets Committee.
Posebne točke
Specific points
Pripravljavec mnenja meni, da je predlog Komisije, da se ukine posebna pomoč za energetske poljščine, neustrezen za nove države članice, zlasti za države z neuporabljenimi kmetijskimi zemljišči (uvodna izjava 38).
Your draftsman is of the opinion that the Commission's proposal to eliminate the specific support for energy crops is not appropriate for the new Member States, particularly the countries with unused agricultural land (recital 38).
Zato bi se v novo uredbo s predlogom spremembe lahko ponovno uvedel naslov IV, poglavje 5 iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003, s čimer bi se v novih državah članicah ohranil sedanji sistem.
Therefore, an amendment taking up Title IV, chapter 5 of regulation 1782/2003 and re-introducing it into new regulation could be tabled, thus maintaining the current system for New Member States.
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja predloge iz sistematskega pregleda za ukinitev prahe in mlečnih kvot kot instrumenta za nadzor ponudbe.
Welcomes the Health Check proposals to abolish of set aside and to end the milk quota as an instrument of supply control.
Strinja se z uporabo intervencijskih cen za žita zgolj kot varnostne mreže.
Appreciates the use of intervention prices for cereals only as a safety net.
Enako načelo intervencije bi moralo veljati za svinjsko meso, namesto da se intervencija odpravi (uvodna izjava 5).
The same principle of intervention should be applied for pig meat instead to abolish it (recital 5).
To bi bilo tudi skladno s poročilom AGRI, vendar bi bilo treba vložiti predlog spremembe k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007 (uvodna izjava 5 in predlog spremembe 14 ter po možnosti tudi 18), ki Odboru za proračun ni bil predložen.
This would also be in line with AGRI report, but an amendment should be tabled to regulation 1234/2007 (recital 5 and amendments 14, and possibly 18) which has not been referred to the Budgets committee.
V zvezi z razvojem podeželja in strateškimi smernicami zanj pripravljavec mnenja podpira predloge Komisije.
Concerning rural development and strategic guidelines for it, your draftsman supports the Commission's proposals.
( 1a ) opozarja na izjavo št. 3, ki je priložena medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju z dne 17. maja 2006
Recalls Declaration 3 annexed to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
1. , ki predvideva finančno revizijo vseh vidikov porabe EU, vključno s skupno kmetijsko politiko;
1. , which provides for financial revision of all aspects of EU spending including the Common Agricultural Policy;
( 1b ) opozarja, da se bo letni znesek določil v letnem proračunskem postopku;
Recalls that the annual amount will be decided within the annual budgetary procedure;
Namen predloga spremembe je opozoriti, da za ta predlog, ki je del skupne kmetijske politike, ne velja zgolj vmesni pregled večletnega finančnega okvira, predviden v izjavi št. 3 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 in sklepih Evropskega sveta („celovit in obsežen pregled, ki bo zajemal vse vidike porabe EU, vključno s skupno kmetijsko politiko“), ampak tudi v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka.
This amendment aims to recall that the proposal, being part of the CAP, it is not only subject to the mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial Framework foreseen in Declaration 3 of the IIA of 17 May 2006 and the conclusions of the European Council (‘full, wide-ranging review covering all aspects of EU spending, including the CAP’), but also subject to scrutiny within the annual Budget Procedure
(a) spremembe najvišjih zneskov, ki se lahko odobrijo v skladu z neposrednimi plačili,
(a) modifications to maximum amounts that may be granted in accordance with the direct payments;
(b) spremembe prostovoljne modulacije iz Uredbe (ES) št. 378/2007,
(b) modifications to the voluntary modulation referred to in Regulation (EC) No 378/2007;
(c) strukturne spremembe kmetijskih gospodarstev.
(c) structural changes of the holdings.
(c) strukturne spremembe kmetijskih gospodarstev ;
(c) structural changes of the holdings,
ter o tem obvesti Evropski parlament .
and shall inform the European Parliament thereof .
Ker je težko napovedati dejanske finančne potrebe za neposredna plačila, se predlaga, naj Komisija letno pregleda zgornje meje za neposredna plačila državam članicam in jih primerja z dejanskimi potrebami.
As it is difficult to foresee the real financial needs for direct payments, it is proposed that the Commission should review annually the ceilings for Members States' direct payments and compare them to actual needs.
Podpora za ukrepe iz odstavka 1(b) se lahko odobri samo:
Support for measures referred to in paragraph 1(b) may only be granted:
(a) po popolni izvedbi sheme enotnega plačila v zadevnem sektorju v skladu s členi 54, 55 in 71.
(a) upon full implementation of the single payment scheme in the sector concerned in accordance with Articles 54, 55 and 71.
(b) do potrebne mere, da se ustvari spodbuda za ohranjanje trenutnih ravni pridelave.
(b) to the extent necessary to create an incentive to maintain current levels of production.
Nadaljevanje predlogov sprememb k členu 68(1).
Following amendments on Article 68, paragraph 1.
Člen 68 – odstavek 4
Article 68 – paragraph 4
Predlog spremembe se opusti, če ti predlogi sprememb ne bodo sprejeti.
The amendment should fall if these amendments are not adopted.
Prenos pravic do plačila s povečanimi zneski na enoto in prenos dodatnih pravic do plačila iz odstavka 5(c) se lahko dovoli le, če prenesene pravice vključujejo prenos enakovrednega števila hektarjev.
The transfer of payment entitlements with increased unit values and of additional payment entitlements referred to in paragraph 5(c) may only be allowed if the transferred entitlements are accompanied by the transfer of an equivalent number of hectares.
Člen 132 a (novo)
Article 132 a (new)
Člen 132a
Article 132a
Komisija izvede študijo, ki ocenjuje dejanske stroške kmetov, ki izhajajo iz usklajevanja z zakonodajo EU na področju okolja, dobrega počutja živali in varnosti hrane, ki določa standarde, ki presegajo tiste za uvožene proizvode.
The Commission shall undertake a study assessing the actual costs for farmers which result from complying with EU legislation in the fields of the environment, animal welfare and food safety, which provides for standards going beyond those to which import products are subject.
Ta zakonodaja med drugim vključuje uredbe in direktive iz Priloge II, ki podpirajo sistem navzkrižne skladnosti, ter standarde, opredeljene kot dobri kmetijski in okoljski pogoji iz Priloge III, ki so prav tako del zahtev navzkrižne skladnosti.
Such legislation includes, inter alia, the regulations and directives listed in Annex II which underpin the cross-compliance system, as well as the standards defined as good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC) in Annex III which are also part of the cross-compliance requirements.
Študija na omenjen način ocenjuje stroške usklajevanja v vseh državah članicah, ki se morda razlikujejo med državami članicami in celo med njihovimi regijami zaradi razlik v podnebnih, geoloških, gospodarskih in družbenih značilnostih ter značilnostih proizvodnje.
The study shall assess the compliance costs as described above in all Member States, which might vary between Member States and even between regions within Member States depending on differences in climatic, geological, economic, social and production features.
Evropski parlament je večkrat izrazil mnenje (T6-0598/2007 in T6-0093/2008), da bi bilo treba nadaljevati z racionalizacijo neposrednih plačil po letu 2013 tako, da bi bila višina teh plačil odvisna od dejanskih stroškov usklajevanja z zakonodajo EU, ki presega standarde, določene za uvožene proizvode.
The European Parliament has repeatedly voiced its position (T6-0598/2007and T6-0093/2008) that direct payments should be further rationalized after 2013 by making the height of these payments dependent on the actual costs of compliance with EU legislation that goes beyond the standards that import products are subject to.
(29a) Sistem navzkrižne skladnosti in skupna kmetijska politika bosta v prihodnosti verjetno zahtevala dodatno prilagajanje, saj se zdi, da raven plačil zdaj ni vedno sorazmerna s prizadevanji zadevnih kmetov za skladnost, ker so plačila še vedno zelo odvisna od pretekle porabe.
(29a) The cross-compliance system and the common agricultural policy (CAP) will probably require further adjustment in the future, as the level of payments currently does not always seem proportionate to the compliance efforts made by the farmers concerned, because payments still depend to a large extent on historic spending.
Zlasti zakonodaja o dobrem počutju živali je za živinorejce očitno najbolj obremenjujoča, kar se ne odraža pri višini njihovih plačil.
In particular, animal welfare legislation is obviously most burdensome for livestock farmers, which is not reflected in the level of their payments.
Komisija si mora zato prizadevati za priznanje netrgovinskih vprašanj kot uvoznih meril pri pogajanjih v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
The Commission should therefore strive for recognition of non-trade concerns as import criteri a within the World Trade Organis ation negotiations.
Ponovno se vloži predlog spremembe, ki ga je Evropski parlament sprejel v okviru poročila T6 - 0598/2007 11. decembra 2007 z naslovom „SKP: Skupna pravila za sheme neposrednih podpor in nekatere sheme podpore za kmete ter podpora za razvoj podeželja“.
Reinstatement of amendment adopted by the European Parliament as part of report T6 - 0598/2007 on 11 December 2007 entitled "CAP: common rules for direct support schemes and certain support schemes for farmers and support for rural development".
Evropski kmetijski sektor se sooča s pomembnimi izzivi, kot so podnebne spremembe in pomanjkanje vode, to pa se bo nadaljevalo tudi v prihodnosti.
The European agricultural sector is facing big challenges, such as climate change and water scarcity, and it will continue to do so.
Zato je bistveno, da se skupna kmetijska politika prilagodi tem izzivom.
It is of big importance that the Common Agricultural Policy is adapted to those challenges.
V evropskem kmetijstvu se še vedno porabi veliko vode, pesticidov, gnojil in energije, ta količina pa se brez potrebnih ukrepov ne bo zmanjšala.
European agriculture still uses a lot of water, pesticides, fertilizers and energy, and without the necessary measures it will keep doing so.
Težko je pojasniti javnosti, da Evropska unija daje neposredna plačila velikim kmetijam, ki se ukvarjajo z intenzivnim kmetijstvom, na podlagi donosa v preteklosti ali lastništva zemlje, ne da bi od kmetov zahtevala zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov ter porabe vode, pesticidov, gnojil in energije.
It is difficult to explain to the public that the European Union is giving direct payments to large, intensive farms, on the basis of historic yields or landownership, without asking farmers to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and their use of water, pesticides, fertilizers and energy.
Plačevanje javnih storitev
Paying for public services
Neposredna plačila naj bi se znatno zmanjšala, da bi se s tem povečale koristi za okolje in zaposlovanje.
Direct payments were supposed to be substantially cut in favour of strengthening environmental and employment benefits.
Žal je Komisija v svojih zakonodajnih predlogih, predstavljenih maja letos, le malo zmanjšala neposredna plačila.
Unfortunately, the Commission just marginally cut the direct payments in its legislative proposals, presented in May of this year.
Kmetje ne bi smeli prejemati plačil na podlagi donosa v preteklosti ali lastništva zemlje, temveč na podlagi javnih storitev, kot so spodbujanje biotske raznovrstnosti in upravljanje vode, ter za dosežke na področju varovanja okolja, dobrega počutja živali in varnosti hrane, ki presegajo zakonske obveznosti.
Farmers should not be paid for historic yields or landownership, but for the public services that they deliver, such as enhancing biodiversity, and water management, and for achievements in the fields of environment, animal welfare and food safety, that go further than the legal obligations.
Pripravljavka mnenja zato predlaga postopno odpravo vseh veljavnih neposrednih plačil do leta 2020.
The rapporteur therefore proposes to phase out all current direct payments by 2020.
Proračunsko načelo skupne kmetijske politike bi moralo biti „poraba javnega denarja za plačilo javnih storitev“.
The budgetary principle in the Common Agricultural Policy should be 'using public money to pay for public services'.
Merila navzkrižne skladnosti
Cross- compliance criteria
Vsakršno javno financiranje kmetijstva mora biti pogojeno s spoštovanjem zakonodaje o varovanju okolja in narave ter dobrem počutju živali.
Any form of public funding for farming must be conditional on respect for environmental, nature and animal welfare legislation.
To se ureja z merili navzkrižne skladnosti.
This is regulated through the cross-compliance criteria.
Pripravljavka mnenja predlaga okrepitev teh meril ter vključitev dodatnih določb o porabi vode in emisijah toplogrednih plinov v merila navzkrižne skladnosti.
The rapporteur proposes to strengthen these criteria and to include additional provisions on water use and greenhouse gas emissions in the cross-compliance criteria.
Izkušnje kažejo, da je treba okrepiti nadzor in povečati kazni za nespoštovanje meril navzkrižne skladnosti.
Experience has shown the necessity of strengthening controls and increasing penalties for not respecting the cross-compliance criteria.
Pripravljavka mnenja za zagotovitev okrepitve nadzora predlaga vzpostavitev najmanjšega obsega nadzora.
To ensure that controls will be strengthened, the rapporteur proposes to set a minimum amount of controls.
Pristojni organi držav članic bi morali letno nadzirati vsaj 5 % vseh kmetij.
The competent authorities in Member States should annually control at least 5% of all farms.
Ukinitev obvezne prahe
Abolition of mandatory set aside
Komisija predlaga ukinitev obvezne prahe.
The Commission proposes to abolish mandatory set aside.
To bo povzročilo nadaljnje izginjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, zlasti ptic, ter izgubo drugih bistvenih koristi za okolje.
This will cause a further loss of biodiversity, of birdlife in particular, and of other significant environmental benefits.
Teh koristi z ukinitvijo prahe ne bo več, zato bi se morala ta izguba nadomestiti s ciljnimi ukrepi v okviru navzkrižne skladnosti in politike za razvoj podeželja.
This loss should be compensated through targeted measures within cross-compliance and within the Rural Development policy.
Poleg tega se na mejah polj vzpostavijo varovalni pasovi z naravnim in cvetočim rastlinjem ter s posevki ekstenzivne pridelave, pri kateri se ne uporabijo pesticidi ali gnojila.
Furthermore buffer strips, with natural and blooming vegetation and extensively managed crops, in which no pesticides or fertilizers are used, shall be set along field borders.
To ni le dober ukrep za spodbujanje biotske raznovrstnosti, ampak tudi za čistejšo zemljo ter zlasti za čistejšo podzemno in površinsko vodo.
This is not only a good measure to enhance biodiversity, but it also leads to a cleaner soil and especially to cleaner ground- and surface water.
Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba nameniti intenzivni živinoreji, ki povzroča približno 18 % vseh svetovnih emisij CO2.
Special attention should be paid to intensive livestock farming, which causes about 18% of the global CO2 emissions.
Sredstva skupne kmetijske politike se v nobenem primeru ne bi smela uporabljati za spodbujanje porabe mesa, kar se zdaj še dogaja.
In any case CAP money should not be used to promote meat consumption, which is still being done at this moment.
Vrsta in količina porabe sta svobodni izbiri vsakega posameznika, vendar pa se javna sredstva ne bi smela uporabljati za spodbujanje porabe proizvodov, ki imajo škodljiv učinek na podnebne spremembe, pomanjkanje vode in svetovno pomanjkanje hrane.
What and how much you consume is a free, individual choice, but public money should not be used to promote the consumption of products that have a negative impact on climate change, water scarcity and world hunger.
Za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v vsem kmetijskem sektorju bo Komisija v letu 2009 predlagala zavezujoče zakonodajne predloge, namenjene zmanjšanju emisij toplogrednih plinov iz kmetijskega sektorja za vsaj 30 % do leta 2020 ter za vsaj 80 % do leta 2050.
To reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the whole agricultural sector, the Commission shall propose binding legislative proposals in 2009, aiming at reducing the greenhouse gas emissions by the agricultural sector with at least 30% by 2020, and with at least 80% by 2050.
Dobro počutje živali
Animal welfare
Treba je bistveno izboljšati dobro počutje živali v kmetijskem sektorju.
Animal welfare should be substantially improved in the agricultural sector.
Komisija bi morala v letu 2009 predlagati zavezujoče zakonodajne predloge za izboljšanje dobrega počutja živali v Evropski uniji.
The Commission should propose binding legislative proposals in 2009, aiming at improving animal welfare in the European Union.
Ti predlogi bodo vključevali postopno odpravo industrijske vzreje.
These proposals will include the phasing out of factory farming.
Leta 2007 je večina članov Parlamenta glasovala za odpravo vseh subvencij za živinorejce bikov za bikoborbe.
In 2007 a majority of the Parliament voted in favour of abolishing all subsidies that are given to the breeders of bullfighting bulls.
Žal Komisija in Svet nista upoštevala tega jasnega poziva Parlamenta.
Unfortunately the Commission and the Council ignored this clear call of the Parliament.
Bikoborba je krut šport, ki ga Evropska unija ne bi smela podpirati.
Bullfighting is a cruel sport and should not be supported by the European Union.
Pripravljavka mnenja zato ponavlja poziv Parlamenta k odpravi plačil za živinorejce bikov za bikoborbe.
The rapporteur therefore repeats the call of the Parliament and asks for the abolishment of payments given to the breeders of bullfighting bulls.
Izvozne subvencije
Export subsidies
(1) Izkušnje, pridobljene pri izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete ter o spremembi uredb (EGS) št. 2019/93, (ES) št. 1452/2001, (ES) št. 1453/2001, (ES) št. 1454/2001, (ES) št. 1868/94, (ES) št. 1251/1999, (ES) št. 1254/1999, (ES) št. 1673/2000, (EGS) št. 2358/71 in (ES) št. 2529/2001, kažejo, da je treba nekatere elemente mehanizma podpor prilagoditi.
(1) Experience drawn from the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 shows that certain elements of the support mechanism need to be adjusted.
Zlasti je treba razširiti proizvodno nevezanost neposredne podpore in poenostaviti delovanje sheme enotnega plačila.
In particular the decoupling of direct support should be extended and the functioning of the Single Payment Scheme should be simplified.
Prav tako je treba poudariti, da je bila Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003 od začetka veljavnosti znatno spremenjena.
It should also be noted that Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 has been substantially amended since its entry into force.
Ob upoštevanju tega razvoja in zaradi jasnosti jo je treba razveljaviti in nadomestiti z novo uredbo.
In the light of these developments and in the interest of clarity it should be repealed and replaced by a new Regulation.
Zlasti je treba zelo razširiti proizvodno nevezanost neposredne podpore s ciljem popolne nevezanosti in poenostaviti delovanje sheme enotnega plačila.
In particular the decoupling of direct support should be strongly extended with the aim of full decoupling and the functioning of the Single Payment Scheme should be simplified.
Za dosego okoljskih ciljev, vključno z novimi izzivi, je treba veliko denarja prenesti iz prvega v drugi steber.
In order to reach the environmental ambitions, including the new challenges, we need a big amount of money to be shifted from the first to the second pillar.
Ukinitev obvezne prahe v okviru sheme enotnega plačila ima lahko v nekaterih primerih škodljive posledice za okolje, zlasti glede nekaterih krajinskih značilnosti .
The abolition of compulsory set aside within the single payment scheme may in certain cases have adverse effects for the enviro n ment, in particular as regards certain landscape features.
Zato je primerno okrepiti obstoječe določbe Skupnosti, katerih cilj je varovanje , če ustreza, navedenih krajinskih značilnosti.
It is therefore appropriate to reinforce the existing Community provisions aiming at protecting , where a p propriate, specified landscape features.
Ukinitev obvezne prahe v okviru sheme enotnega plačila bo povzročila nadaljnje izginjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, zlasti ptic, ter izgubo drugih bistvenih koristi za okolje.
The abolition of compulsory set aside within the single payment scheme will cause a further loss of biodiversity, of bird life in particular, and of other significant environmental benefits.
Zato je treba omogočiti primerno nadomestilo, katerega cilj je varovanje in spodbujanje biotske raznovrstnosti, vključno z varovanjem in ponovno vzpostavitvijo navedenih krajinskih značilnosti.
It is therefore necessary to provide for an appropriate compensation aiming at protecting and enhancing biodiversity , including , protecting and re-establishing specified landscape features.
To bi bilo treba doseči z okrepitvijo obstoječih določb Skupnosti in tudi z novimi nadomestnimi ukrepi.
This should be achieved by reinforcing the existing Community provisions, but also by introducing new compensatory measures.