natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog Komisije prispeva k oblikovanju strukturne politike v manj razvitih državah.
The Commission proposal makes a contribution to the development of the policy infrastructure in less developed countries.
To bi lahko preprečilo neodgovorno uporabo kemikalij, ki bi škodilo okolju, gospodarstvu ali delovnim razmeram.
This could combat irresponsible use of chemicals which would otherwise damage ecology, the economy and working conditions.
Poročevalec sprejema večino sprememb.
Your rapporteur can accept most of the changes.
Nasprotuje le spremembi določb o izrecni odobritvi za dovoljenje izvoza.
Only the amendment of the provisions on explicit authorisation to permit exports meets with objections.
Prav tako predlog ni skladen z uredbo REACH v celoti.
The proposal also does not entirely correspond to the REACH Regulation.
Zdaj zahteva EU (tj. v skladu z uredbo, ki se uporablja zdaj) za te snovi izrecno odobritev držav uvoznic.
The EU so far (i.e. under the Regulation as it currently stands) unilaterally requires explicit authorisation from importing countries for these substances.
Izvozniki iz držav, ki niso članice EU, lahko te snovi uvažajo brez predhodne odobritve države uvoznice.
Exporters from non-EU countries can supply these substances without obtaining prior authorisation from the importing country.
Predlog Komisije omogoča začasni izvoz, če ni prejeta izrecna odobritev.
The Commission proposal allows exports to proceed temporarily if no explicit authorisation is received.
Zato lahko evropski izvozniki kemikalij, ki so strogo omejene v Evropi, te snovi izvažajo lažje.
Consequently, European exporters of chemicals which are severely restricted in Europe can export these substances more easily.
Če država uvoznica ne predloži odgovora v zvezi z izvozom v 90 dneh, lahko izvoznik snovi v to državo izvaža 12 mesecev.
If an importing country is unable to give an export response within 90 days, exports may proceed for 12 months.
Po 12 mesecih je treba ponovno zahtevati odobritev.
After this, authorisation must again be sought.
Slabost tega bolj prilagodljivega pristopa je, da država, ki ni sposobna odgovoriti v 90 dneh, ne bo mogla uživati nobene zaščite v zvezi z uvozom zadevne snovi, ki je v EU natančno urejen s predpisi.
The disadvantage of this more flexible approach is that a country which is unable to respond within 90 days will no longer enjoy any protection against imports of the substance in question, which is strictly regulated in the EU.
Z vidika okolja je to nezaželena in nenamerna posledica.
From the environmental point of view, this is undesirable and is not the intended outcome.
Vendar je treba upoštevati dejstvo, da je bil cilj zaščititi najmanj razvite države.
However, the point of departure should be that account is to be taken of protection of the least developed countries.
Utemeljeni sta dve merili, na podlagi katerih se lahko pristojni organi v državah članicah po preteku obdobja, v katerem niso odgovorili, odločijo za dovoljenje za izvoz: obstoj ocene in odobritev snovi v državi uvoznici ali dejstva, da je država uvoznica, članica Organizacije za ekonomsko sodelovanje in razvoj.
Two criteria on the basis of which the competent authorities in the Member States can decide after a non-response period to allow exports are defensible: the existence of an assessment and authorisation of the substance in the importing country or the fact that the importing country is an OECD country.
Vendar poročevalec ne more sprejeti utemeljitve, da se snovi lahko izvažajo, če so te iste snovi predhodno že bile uvožene v zadevno državo in ta država ni sprejela nobenih regulativnih in zakonodajnih ukrepov.
However, the argument that substances can be exported if the same substances have previously been imported into the country in question without that country's having taken any regulatory action is not one which your rapporteur can accept.
Cilj te zakonske ureditve je vzpodbuditi upravne ukrepe v manj razvitih državah.
The aim of the legislation is after all to encourage administrative measures in less developed countries.
3.2 Povezava z drugo zakonodajo Pomembno je, da se v to uredbo ustrezno vključijo prepovedi ali omejitve uporabe kemikalij, ki temeljijo na novih ali spremenjenih direktivah in uredbah.
3.2 Connection with other legislation It is important to adequately incorporate into this Regulation prohibitions of or restrictions on the use of chemicals arising from new or amended directives and regulations.
Seznam kemikalij mora biti popoln.
The lists of chemicals must be complete.
V primeru naslednjih uredb in direktiv EU je zlasti pomembno, da se določi, ali je treba zadevne kemikalije dodati v priloge te uredbe:
In the case of the following EU legislation, in particular, it is important to ascertain whether relevant chemicals should be added to the annexes to this Regulation:
· Uredba (ES) št. 850/2004 o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih, Priloga IV;
· POP Regulation (EC) No 850/2004, Annex IV
· Uredba (ES) št. 1907/2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH), Priloga XVII;
· REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XVII
Direktiva 67/548/EGS, Priloga I.
· Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex I.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals
Opozoriti je treba, da je Sodišče v vzporedni sodbi iz enakih razlogov razveljavilo Sklep Sveta 2003/106/ES z dne 19. decembra 2002 o odobritvi Konvencije v imenu Evropske skupnosti.
It should be noted that "in a parallel judgment, the Court annulled for the same reasons Council Decision 2003/106/EC of 19 December 2002 on the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Convention.
Zato je v obravnavanem predlogu navedena dvojna pravna podlaga, člena 133 in 175(1), kot je predlagalo Sodišče.
Hence, the proposal under consideration proposes a dual legal basis : Articles 133 and 175(1), as suggested by the Court.
a) izvajanje rotterdamske konvencije o postopku soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju (postopek PIC);
(a) Implement the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure (PIC);
b) izdelava postopka za obveščanje o izvozu tistih kemikalij, ki ne spadajo pod rotterdamsko konvencijo in soglasje po predhodnem obveščanju, vendar so v EU prepovedane ali pa zanje veljajo omejitve;
(b) Establish the procedure for export notification for those chemicals which do not fall under the Rotterdam Convention and the PIC but which are forbidden or restricted within the EU;
c) spodbujanje deljene odgovornosti in tvornega sodelovanja v mednarodnem prometu z nevarnimi kemikalijami;
(c) Promote shared responsibility and cooperative efforts in the international movement of hazardous chemicals;
d) prispevek k ekološko sprejemljivi uporabi teh kemikalij;
(d) Contribute to their environmentally sound use;
e) uporaba določb Skupnosti glede razvrščanja, pakiranja in označevanja kemikalij, nevarnih za človeka ali okolje, kadar se te kemikalije izvažajo iz držav članic v druge države pogodbenice ali druge države.
(e) Apply the Community provisions concerning classification, packaging and labelling of chemicals dangerous to man or to the environment to all such chemicals when they are exported from the Member States to other parties or other countries.
Rotterdamska konvencija
The Rotterdam Convention
Obravnavani predlog uvaja rotterdamsko konvencijo o postopku soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju za nekatere nevarne kemikalije in pesticide v mednarodni trgovini.
The proposal under consideration implements the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade.
Rotterdamska konvencija je bila sprejeta septembra 1998, veljati pa je začela 24. februarja 2004.
The Rotterdam Convention was adopted in September 1998.
Osnovni namen rotterdamske konvencije je preprost: pomagati želi državam pogodbenicam poglobiti znanje o lastnostih potencialno nevarnih kemikalij in pesticidnih pripravkov.
The underlying logic of the Rotterdam Convention is simple: 'help participating countries learn more about the characteristics of potentially hazardous chemicals and pesticide formulations'.
Državam zagotavlja informacije in sredstva za preprečevanje nezaželenega uvoza strupenih kemikalij.
It provides countries with the information and the means to stop the unwanted imports of toxic chemicals.
Konvencija od izvoznikov zahteva, da obveščajo o izvozu nevarnih snovi, država izvoznica pa je dolžna izpolnjevati odločitve držav uvoznic ter držav tranzita, kjer naj bi potekal prevoz odpadkov.
The Convention puts the requirement on the exporter to advise of an export of hazardous substances and an onus on the exporting country to comply with the decisions of importing countries and those transit countries through whose territory the waste will pass.
Pričujoči predlog presega zahteve Konvencije.
The proposal in question goes beyond the requirements of the Convention.
Komisija je v obrazložitvenem memorandumu povzela razlike:
The Commission memorandum summarised the differences:
„– pravila veljajo za izvoze v vse države, ne glede na to, ali so pogodbenice Konvencije ali ne;
"- The rules apply to exports to all countries, whether or not they are Parties to the Convention;
– letna poročila o izvozu so potrebna za širši nabor kemikalij;
- A wider range of chemicals are subject to annual export notification.
– kemikalij PIC in kemikalij, ki so v eni od kategorij uporabe v Konvenciji v Skupnosti prepovedane ali je njihova uporaba strogo omejena, ni mogoče izvoziti brez izrecnega soglasja držav uvoznic;
- PIC chemicals and chemicals that are banned or severely restricted in the Community in a Convention use category cannot be exported without the explicit consent of importing countries;
– izvoz nekaterih izdelkov in kemikalij (kot so kemikalije, ki so tudi predmet stockholmske konvencije o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih) je prepovedan;
- Certain articles and chemicals (such those chemicals that are subject also to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants) are banned for export;
– vse nevarne kemikalije, ki se izvažajo v tretje države, morajo biti označene in pakirane tako kot v Skupnosti (KOM (2006) 745, stran 3).
- All dangerous chemicals exported to third countries have to be labelled and packaged in the same way as they must be within the Community " (COM (2006) 745, page 3).
Tehnične prilagoditve, predlagane v tej novi uredbi
Those adjustments are based on the experience in implementing the annulled Reg.
Prilagoditve temeljijo na izkušnjah pri izvajanju razveljavljene uredbe 304/2003, njihov namen pa je izboljšati učinek predloga.
304/2003 and are meant to improve the functioning of the proposed proposal.
V nadaljevanju so navedene pripombe pripravljavke mnenja.
Your Draftswoman has the following comments to make:
Opredelitev izvoznika je pravilna in upošteva tudi pomisleki Evropskega parlamenta, da bi morala imeti fizična ali pravna oseba, v imenu katere se odda izvozna deklaracija in ki mora obvestiti imenovani nacionalni organ države članice, sedež v tej državi članici (člen 3(15)).
The definition of the exporter is correct and takes account of the EP concerns that the natural or legal person on whose behalf an export declaration is made and is required to notify the Designated National Authority of a Member State should be established in the said Member State (Article 3(15)).
Opredelitev pripravka (to je zmesi ali raztopine, sestavljene iz dveh ali več snovi) je sprejemljiva in pomeni obvezno označevanje, če to zahteva Direktiva 1999/45/ES o razvrščanju, pakiranju in označevanju (člena 3(2) in 1(2)).
The definition of the preparation (i.e. a mixture or a solution composed of two or more substances) is acceptable and means compulsory labelling if required by Directive 1999/45/EC on classification, packaging and labelling (Articles 3(2) and 1(2)).
Postopek izrecnega soglasja iz člena 13(6) predloga je dobrodošel, a je povzročil zaskrbljenost pri trgovcih EU.
The explicit consent procedure under Article 13.6 of the proposal is welcomed but has caused anxiety to the EU traders.
Namen člena 13 je pravilen, saj je določeno, da se kemikalij iz dela 3 Priloge I tega predlogu ne sme izvoziti brez izrecnega soglasja države uvoznice.
The logic of Article 13 is correct because it says that chemicals listed in part 3 of Annex I of the said proposal should not be exported without the explicit consent of the importing country.
Enak pristop velja za vse kemikalije, ki so v Skupnosti prepovedane ali je njihova uporaba omejena in izpolnjujejo pogoje za obveščanje PIC.
The same approach is applied to any chemical that is banned or restricted within the Community and qualifies for PIC notification.
EU in države članice si nenehno prizadevajo za poostritev carinskega nadzora nad izvoženimi in uvoženimi kemikalijami.
The strengthening of customs controls of exported and imported chemicals has been a constant concern in both the EU and its Member States.
Carinski organi držav članic imajo pomembno vlogo, saj so odgovorni za izpolnjevanje takih uredb.
The role of the customs authorities of Member States is important because they are responsible for ensuring compliance with regulations of this type.
Predlagana uredba v členu 17 navaja več ukrepov, kot sta klasifikacija kemikalij s številčnimi kodami v izvoznih deklaracijah in vzpostavitev zbirke podatkov EDEXIM pri Komisiji.
The proposed regulation entails in Article 17 several actions, such as classification of chemicals carrying a "code number" in their export declarations and development of the Commission's EDEXIM database.
Oba ukrepa bosta vnesla več jasnosti v dodatne zahteve, ki jih je EU predvidela za postopek PIC.
Both measures will help to bring light into the additional requirements foreseen by the EU for the PIC.
Še vedno pa ostaja odprto vprašanje, ali se bo s predlagano uredbo zmanjšalo upravno breme za carino in izvoznike.
But a question remains still on the table: unclear is whether this proposed regulation would reduce the administrative burden both for customs and exporters.
Namen predlaganih sprememb
Logic of amendments proposed
Imenovani nacionalni organ izvoznika lahko, v posvetovanju s Komisijo, odloči, da se izvoz lahko nadaljuje, kadar kljub vsem razumnim naporom odgovor na zahtevo za izrecno soglasje v skladu z odstavkom 6(a) ni prejet v obdobju naslednjih rokov:
The Designated National Authority of the exporter may, in consultation with the Commission, decide that the export may proceed if , after all reasonable efforts, no response to a request for explicit consent pursuant to paragraph 6(a) has been received within either of the following time-limits:
Imenovani nacionalni organ izvoznika lahko, v posvetovanju s Komisijo, odloči, da se izvoz lahko nadaljuje, kadar odgovor na zahtevo za izrecno soglasje v skladu z odstavkom 6(a) ni prejet v obdobju naslednjih rokov:
The Designated National Authority of the exporter may, in consultation with the Commission, decide that the export may proceed if no response to a request for explicit consent pursuant to paragraph 6(a) has been received within either of the following time-limits:
Prvotno besedilo je nejasno, saj se lahko razlage "razumnih naporov" razlikujejo.
The original wording is too vague since the interpretation of ‘reasonable efforts’ can vary.
Člen 13, odstavek 7, točki (a) in (b)
Article 13, paragraph 7, points (a) and (b)
(a) 60 dni , če obstajajo dokazi uradnih virov v pogodbenici uvoznici ali drugi državi uvoznici, da je kemikalija v času uvoza licencirana, registrirana ali odobrena, ali če se je pred kratkim uporabljala v pogodbenici uvoznici ali drugi državi uvoznici oziroma je bila v njo uvožena in ni bil sprejet noben ureditveni ukrep za prepoved njene uporabe;
(a) 60 days , where there is evidence from official sources in the importing Party or importing other country that the chemical, at the time of importation, is licensed, registered or authorised or that it has recently been used in, or imported into, the importing Party or importing other country and no regulatory action has been taken to prohibit its use;
(a) 30 dni po datumu prvotne zahteve , če obstajajo dokazi uradnih virov v pogodbenici uvoznici ali drugi državi uvoznici, da je kemikalija v času uvoza licencirana, registrirana ali odobrena, ali če se je pred kratkim uporabljala v pogodbenici uvoznici ali drugi državi uvoznici oziroma je bila v njo uvožena in ni bil sprejet noben ureditveni ukrep za prepoved njene uporabe;
(a) 30 days after the date of the original request , where there is evidence from official sources in the importing Party or importing other country that the chemical, at the time of importation, is licensed, registered or authorised or that it has recently been used in, or imported into, the importing Party or importing other country and no regulatory action has been taken to prohibit its use;
(b) 90 dni , v vseh drugih primerih.
(b) 90 days , in all other cases.
(b) 60 dni po datumu prvotne zahteve , v vseh drugih primerih.
(b) 60 days after the date of the original request , in all other cases.
Ni jasno, kdaj začne teči rok.
It is unclear with which action the time-limit is launched.
Krajši roki pospešujejo trgovino in preprečujejo, da bi bila evropska podjetja v slabšem konkurenčnem položaju v primerjavi z neevropsko industrijo.
Shorter time-limits facilitate trade and will help prevent European companies being put at a competitive disadvantage compared to non-European industry.
Člen 13, odstavek 8, pododstavek 1, točke (a), (b) in (c)
Article 13, paragraph 8, subparagraph 1, points (a), (b) and (c)
(a) za vsako izrecno soglasje, pridobljeno v skladu z odstavkom 6(a), se do konca petega koledarskega leta po letu, ko je bilo soglasje dano, zahteva novo izrecno soglasje, razen če pogoji tega soglasja zahtevajo drugače;
(a) for each explicit consent obtained pursuant to paragraph 6(a) a new explicit consent shall be required by the end of the fifth calendar year after the consent was given, unless the terms of that consent require otherwise;
(b) vsak odstop, odobren v skladu z odstavkom 7(a), velja največ dve koledarski leti , po preteku katerih se zahteva izrecno soglasje, razen če je bil vmes prejet odgovor na zahtevek;
(b) unless a response to a request has been received in the meantime, each waiver granted pursuant to paragraph 7(a) shall be for a maximum period of two calendar years , upon expiry of which explicit consent shall be required;
(b) vsak odstop, odobren v skladu z odstavkom 7(a), velja največ štiri koledarska leta , po preteku katerih se zahteva izrecno soglasje, razen če je bil vmes prejet odgovor na zahtevek;
(b) unless a response to a request has been received in the meantime, each waiver granted pursuant to paragraph 7(a) shall be for a maximum period of four calendar years , upon expiry of which explicit consent shall be required;
vsak odstop, odobren v skladu z odstavkom 7(b), velja največ 12 mesecev , po preteku katerih se zahteva izrecno soglasje, razen če je bil vmes prejet odgovor na zahtevek.
(c) unless a response to a request has been received in the meantime, each waiver granted pursuant to paragraph 7(b) shall be for a maximum period of 12 months , upon expiry of which explicit consent shall be required.
(c) vsak odstop, odobren v skladu z odstavkom 7(b), velja največ 2 leti , po preteku katerih se zahteva izrecno soglasje, razen če je bil vmes prejet odgovor na zahtevek.
(c) unless a response to a request has been received in the meantime, each waiver granted pursuant to paragraph 7(b) shall be for a maximum period of 2 years , upon expiry of which explicit consent shall be required.
Uvedba rednih pregledov povzroča pravno negotovost in upravno breme.
The introduction of a periodical review leads to legal uncertainty and administrative burden.
Ko je pridobljeno izrecno soglasje, se veljavnost ne sme izteči prehitro.
Once an explicit consent has been obtained, its validity should not expire too quickly.
Člen 13, odstavek 8, pododstavek 3
Article 13, paragraph 8, subparagraph 3
V primeru iz točke (c) se izvozi ne smejo nadaljevati po preteku zadevnega roka, razen če je prejeto izrecno soglasje ali če so , po novem zahtevku za izrecno soglasje, izpolnjeni pogoji iz odstavka 7(a).
In the case referred to in point (c), exports may not continue beyond the expiry of the relevant period unless explicit consent is obtained or the conditions of paragraph 7(a) are met following a new request for explicit consent.
V primeru iz točke (c) se izvozi ne smejo nadaljevati po preteku zadevnega roka, razen če je prejeto izrecno soglasje ali če je , po novem zahtevku za izrecno soglasje, izpolnjen kateri koli pogoj, naveden v odstavku 7(a) , ali če pogodbenica uvoznica v 30 dneh ni odgovorila na nov zahtevek za izrecno soglasje .
In the case referred to in point (c), exports may not continue beyond the expiry of the relevant period unless explicit consent is obtained or any of the conditions referred to in paragraph 7(a) is met following a new request for explicit consent or the importing Party has not responded within 30 days to a new request for explicit consent .
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi okvira Skupnosti za zbiranje, upravljanje in uporabo podatkov v sektorju ribištva in podporo znanstvenemu svetovanju v zvezi s Skupno ribiško politiko
on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and supporting scientific opinions on the Common Fisheries Policy
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi okvira Skupnosti za zbiranje, upravljanje in uporabo podatkov v sektorju ribištva in podporo znanstvenemu svetovanju v zvezi s Skupno ribiško politiko
on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and supporting scientific opinion on the Common Fisheries Policy
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0196 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0196 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0152/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0152/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6‑0407/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0407/2007 ),
(6) Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1543/2000 z dne 29. junija 2000 o vzpostavitvi okvira Skupnosti za zbiranje in upravljanje podatkov, ki so potrebni za vodenje skupne ribiške politike je treba spremeniti tako, da se upošteva pristop k upravljanju ribištva na osnovi flote, potreba po vzpostavitvi ekosistemskega pristopa, potreba po izboljšani kakovosti, popolnosti in širšem dostopu do ribiških podatkov, učinkovitejša podpora nudenja znanstvenega svetovanja in spodbujanje sodelovanja med državami članicami.
(6) Council Regulation (EC) No 1543/2000 of 29 June 2000 establishing a Community framework for the collection and management of the data needed to conduct the common fisheries policy needs to be reviewed in order to take due consideration of a fleet based approach towards fisheries management, the need to develop an ecosystem approach, the need for improved quality, completeness and broader access to fisheries data, more efficient support for provision of scientific advice and the promotion of cooperation among Member States.