natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
6. čestita varuhu človekovih pravic za jasno in obsežno predstavitev svojih dejavnosti; vendarle predlaga, da naj bo v prihodnjih poročilih v povzetku dejavnosti in vsebinski analizi več poudarka na strukturnih problemih in transverzalnih težnjah;
Congratulates the Ombudsman on the clear and comprehensive presentation of his work; suggests, nonetheless, that in future reports the summary of activities and thematic analysis should place greater emphasis on structural problems and general trends;
8. pozdravlja izredno dobre odnose med varuhom človekovih pravic in Odborom za peticije znotraj institucionalnega okvira, ko gre za medsebojno spoštovanje posameznih pristojnosti; spodbuja prakso, da je na vseh sejah Odbora za peticije navzoč predstavnik varuha človekovih pravic, ki jo je varuh že uvedel;
Welcomes the excellent relationship between the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions within the institutional framework as regards reciprocal respect for their competences; favours the continuation of the practice already established by the Ombudsman of sending a representative to each meeting of the Committee on Petitions;
12. je prav tako zadovoljen s prizadevanji varuha človekovih pravic, da skrajša povprečno trajanje svojih preiskav na devet mesecev; poziva k temu, da vse institucije in organi EU prejmejo proračunska sredstva in osebje, ki ga potrebujejo za hitro obravnavo pritožb in peticij;
Welcomes the Ombudsman’s endeavours which resulted in his shortening the average length of his inquiries to nine months; calls for all EU institutions and bodies to be given the necessary budgetary and human resources to ensure that rapid action is taken in response to complaints and petitions;
17. obžaluje število pritožb, povezanih z nepotrebnimi zamudami pri beleženju pritožb, njihovi obravnavi in sprejetju sklepov; predlaga, da bi v okviru revizije finančne uredbe predvideli odškodnine za primere očitnih in daljših zamud;
Deplores the number of complaints concerning avoidable delays in registering requests, handling cases and taking decisions; proposes that the revision of the Financial Regulation should include provision for financial compensation in the event of manifest and prolonged delays;
21. poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj nacionalne varuhe človekovih pravic spodbuja k rednemu sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti, po vzoru sodelovanja med evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic in Parlamentom;
Calls on the Ombudsman to encourage national ombudsmen to hold regular exchanges of views with their national parliaments, modelled on those which have been established between the European Ombudsman and Parliament;
Predsednik Evropskega parlamenta Jerzy Buzek je 19. aprila 2010 uradno prejel letno poročilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2009, evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamanduros pa je svoje poročilo 4. maja 2010 predstavil Odboru za peticije.
The annual report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2009 was formally submitted to the President of the European Parliament, Jerzy Buzek, on 19 April 2010, and the European Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros, presented his report to the Committee on Petitions on 4 May 2010.
Poročilo je pregled dejavnosti evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v minulem letu.
The report provides an overview of the European Ombudsman’s activities over the last year.
Različne ugotovitve preiskav so predstavljene po kategorijah glede na vrsto nepravilnosti ali institucijo.
The various inquiry findings are broken down by categories such as nature of alleged maladministration or institution concerned.
Objavljen je bil tudi povzetek na šestih straneh.
A six-page Overview has also been produced.
V njem so zabeleženi najpomembnejši rezultati v zvezi s pritožbami in izpostavljena glavna vprašanja, obravnavana v preteklem letu.
This publication records the most important results obtained for complainants and highlights the main problems dealt with over the past year.
Za 727 pritožbi je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile v pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic.
727 complaints were found to be covered by the Ombudsman’s mandate.
Večina preiskav varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2009 je zadevala Evropsko komisijo (56 %).
Most inquiries opened by the Ombudsman in 2009 concerned the European Commission (56 %).
Pritožbe so zadevale tudi upravo Evropskega parlamenta (11 %), Evropski urad za izbor osebja (9 %), Svet (4 %) in Sodišče Evropske unije (3 %).
Complainants also targeted the administration of the European Parliament (11 %), the European Personnel Selection Office EPSO (9 %), the Council (4 %) and the Court of Justice (3 %).
V 59 preiskavah (17 %) je bilo obravnavanih še 23 drugih institucij in organov EU.
23 other EU institutions and bodies were the subject of a further 59 inquiries (17 %).
Leta 2009 je bilo zaključenih 318 preiskav.
The number of inquiries closed in 2009 was 318.
Večina je bila zaključenih v manj kot letu dni (70 %), več kot polovica (55 %) pa v treh mesecih.
Most were closed within less than a year (70 %) and more than half (55 %) within three months.
311 preiskav je bilo začetih na podlagi pritožb, sedem pa jih je varuh človekovih pravic izvedel na lastno pobudo.
Of these, 311 were linked to complaints and 7 were own-initiative inquiries.
V 58 primerih je preiskava pokazala, da ni bilo nepravilnosti, kar ni nujno negativen izid za pritožnika, saj mu je posredovana celostna obrazložitev pristojnih institucij ali organov, za slednje pa je to priložnost za izboljšanje kakovosti upravnih storitev.
In 58 cases the inquiry revealed no maladministration, a finding which is not necessarily a negative outcome for the complainant, since he or she gets a full explanation from the institution or body concerned, and there may be an opportunity to identify a potential improvement in the quality of administration provided by an institution or body.
V letu 2009 so zadevne institucije ali organi v prid pritožnika rešili 166 primerov (56 %).
During 2009, 166 cases (56 %) were settled to the satisfaction of the complainant by the institution or body concerned.
Te primere je rešila institucija ali pa je bila dosežena sporazumna rešitev.
These cases were either settled by the institution or a friendly solution was agreed.
To odraža vse večjo pripravljenost institucij in organov, da pritožbe, naslovljene na varuha, vidijo kot priložnost za popravo napak in da sodelujejo z varuhom v korist evropskih državljanov.
This reflects a growing willingness to regard complaints made to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to correct mistakes and to cooperate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of European citizens.
V svojem letnem poročilu je varuh človekovih pravic izpostavil devet primerov 1 , ki so bili primeri dobre prakse.
In his Annual Report the Ombudsman highlights 9 cases 1 which constitute illustrative examples of best practice.
Ko sporazumna rešitev ni možna, varuh človekovih pravic primer zaključi s kritično oceno ali pa pripravi osnutek priporočila.
When a friendly solution is not possible, the Ombudsman closes the case with critical remarks, or makes a draft recommendation.
Kritična ocena pritožniku potrdi, da je njegova pritožba upravičena, zadevni instituciji ali organu pa nakaže, kje je storil napako, kar naj bi pripomoglo k izogibanju nepravilnostim v prihodnje.
Critical remarks confirm to the complainant that his or her complaint is justified and indicate to the institution or body concerned what it has done wrong, so as to help it avoid maladministration in the future.
Leta 2009 je varuh s kritično oceno zaključil 35 preiskav.
In 2009, the Ombudsman closed 35 inquiries with critical remarks.
Varuh človekovih pravic je zato, da bodo institucijam in organom napake v poduk in da se bodo v prihodnje izognili nepravilnostim, na svoji spletni strani objavil študijo o ukrepih, ki so jih institucije sprejele na podlagi kritičnih ocen in dodatnih pripomb iz leta 2008.
It is with a view to ensuring that the institutions and bodies learn from their mistakes and that maladministration is avoided in future that the Ombudsman has published on his website a study of the follow-up undertaken by the institutions involved to all critical remarks and further remarks issued in 2008.
Treba je pripomniti, da je bila zabeležena 79 - odstotna raven zadovoljstva z ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti na podlagi kritičnih ocen.
It is worth noting that the level of satisfaction with the action taken in response to these critical remarks was 79 %.
Leta 2009 je bilo oblikovanih 15 osnutkov priporočil.
During 2009, 15 draft recommendations were made.
Poleg tega je bilo v letu 2009 dokončanih sedem osnutkov priporočil iz leta 2008 in zaključena dva primera v zvezi z osnutki priporočil iz leta 2007.
In addition, 7 draft recommendations made in 2008 received responses in 2009, and two cases were closed as a result of draft recommendations made in 2007.
Varuh ni v letu 2009 Parlamentu poslal nobenega posebnega poročila.
In 2009, the Ombudsman did not submit any special reports to Parliament.
Varuh človekovih pravic je začel tudi štiri preiskave na lastno pobudo.
The Ombudsman also launched four inquiries on his own initiative.
Te so zadevale uporabo pooblastila varuha človekovih pravic, da na lastno pobudo sproži preiskavo, namenjeno reševanju očitno sistematičnih težav znotraj institucij, kot je bila na primer preiskava proti Komisiji v zvezi z dostopom do dokumentov, povezanih s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev.
These involved the use of the Ombudsman’s own-initiative power to tackle what appeared to be a systemic problem within the institutions, such as that raised at the Commission regarding access to documents relating to infringement proceedings.
Cilj teh preiskav je bil zagotoviti, da so državljani seznanjeni s tem, kako pridobiti dostop do dokumentov v zvezi s kršitvami in, če jim je bil dostop zavrnjen, kako ugotoviti, ali za zavrnitvijo stoji Komisija ali država članica oziroma ali zavrnitev temelji na nacionalnem pravu ali pravu Evropske unije.
The aim was to ensure that members of the public knew how to gain access to documents relating to infringements and, if they were denied access, that they could determine whether it was the Commission or the Member State that was responsible for the denial and whether it was based on national or EU law.
Glavna prednostna naloga evropskega varuha človekovih pravic je zagotoviti, da se spoštujejo pravice državljanov iz prava Evropske unije na vseh ravneh Unije in da institucije in organi Evropske unije delujejo po najvišjih upravnih standardih.
The main priorities of the European Ombudsman are to ensure that citizens’ rights under EU law are respected at every level in the Union and that EU institutions and bodies conform to the highest standards of administration.
Varuh si nenehno prizadeva za izboljšanje kakovosti podatkov, ki so na voljo državljanom in morebitnim pritožnikom v zvezi z njihovimi pravicami iz prava Evropske unije, zlasti prek evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic.
The Ombudsman has continued his efforts to improve the quality of information provided to citizens and potential complainants concerning their rights under EU law, especially through the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Mrežo, v kateri je tudi Odbor za peticije, sestavlja približno 94 uradov v 32 državah.
The Network, which includes the Committee on Petitions, consists of roughly 94 offices in 32 countries.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v 977 primerih, ki jih je obravnaval leta 2009, pritožbe, ki jih prejel, posredoval enemu izmed članov evropske mreže.
In 977 cases handled in 2009, the Ombudsman forwarded the complaint which had been referred to him to a member of the European Network: he advised 792 complainants to turn to a national or regional ombudsman, and 185 complainants were referred to the Committee on Petitions.
Varuh človekovih pravic je okrepil tudi sodelovanje s centrom Europe Direct.
The Ombudsman also stepped up his cooperation with Europe Direct.
Varuh si prizadeva, da bi bile institucije in organi Evropske unije pri svojem delovanju osredotočene na državljane, tako da skuša pritožnikom dati vse možnosti za dosego sporazumne rešitve in da sproži več preiskav na lastno pobudo, da bi prepoznal težavo in spodbujal najboljšo prakso.
The Ombudsman strives to make certain that the EU institutions and bodies adopt a citizen-centred approach in all their activities, by seeking every opportunity to achieve friendly solutions to complaints and by launching more inquiries on his own initiative in order to identify problems and encourage best practice.
Varuh človekovih pravic in njegovi sodelavci se zavedajo, kako pomembno je, da so tisti, ki naletijo na težave z upravo Evropske unije, seznanjeni s svojo pravico do pritožbe pri varuhu, zato so v letu 2009 pripravili 145 predstavitev na konferencah, seminarjih in srečanjih.
In the light of the importance of ensuring that those who might have problems with the EU administration know about their right to complain to the Ombudsman, 145 presentations were made by the Ombudsman and his staff at conferences, seminars and meetings during 2009.
Varuh je obiskal Ciper, Slovaško, Češko, Finsko, Estonijo in Italijo, da bi v teh državah razširil osveščenost med državljani o njegovi vlogi.
The Ombudsman also made information visits to Cyprus, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Finland, Estonia and Italy with a view to promoting awareness of his role in these countries.
Mreža varuha človekovih pravic redno objavlja glasilo z novicami in je za svoje člane vzpostavila tudi spletni forum za razprave.
The Ombudsman’s network regularly publishes a newsletter and has established an electronic discussion forum for its members.
Med najzanimivejšimi publikacijami, ki so bile napisane in objavljene v letu 2009, sta letno poročilo in nov dokument, ki nudi povzetek za leto 2008.
Amongst the particularly interesting publications produced and distributed in 2009 were the Annual Report and the new ‘2008 Overview’.
Nova spletna stran varuha človekovih pravic, ki je začela delovati 5. januarja 2009, se redno posodablja, nove storitve, namenjene državljanom, pa se nenehno razvijajo.
The Ombudsman’s new website, launched on 5 January 2009, is regularly updated.
Treba je poudariti poseben pomen interaktivnega vodiča, ki naj bi pomagal državljanom ugotoviti, kateri organ je za reševanje njihove pritožbe najustreznejši.
This new service to citizens is constantly evolving.
Leta 2009 je odgovore na svoja poizvedovanja na straneh interaktivnega vodiča našlo 26 000 oseb.
Of particular interest is the interactive guide, whose purpose is to help members of the public to identify the most appropriate institution to complain to; in 2009, 26 000 people received replies using the interactive guide.
Večina bralcev teh spletnih strani je prihajala iz Španije, sledili pa so bralci iz Italije, Nemčije, Francije in Belgije.
The country from which the largest number of visitors to the website come is Spain, followed by Italy, Germany, France and Belgium.
Odbor za peticije spodbuja varuha, naj si v sodelovanju z institucijami še naprej prizadeva za širjenje dobrega upravljanja in kulturo storitev ter okrepljeno komuniciranje, da bi bili državljani, ki morda potrebujejo njegove storitve, pravilno seznanjeni, kako to storiti.
The Committee on Petitions encourages the Ombudsman to continue to work with the institutions to promote good administration and service culture and to increase the communication efforts, so that citizens who might need to make use of his services are properly informed of how to do so.
Odbor za peticije varuha človekovih pravic spodbuja, naj zadeve rešuje s sporazumnimi rešitvami.
The Committee on Petitions encourages the Ombudsman to seek amicable solutions to cases.
To odraža vse večjo pripravljenost institucij, da pritožbe, naslovljene na varuha, vidijo kot priložnost za popravo napak in sodelovanje z varuhom.
This reflects a growing willingness to regard complaints made to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to correct mistakes and shows that the institutions are willing to cooperate with the Ombudsman.
Odbor za peticije varuha spodbuja, naj uporabi svojo pooblastila za sprožitev preiskav na lastno pobudo, da bi razrešili sistematične težave znotraj institucij, kot je odbor to storil leta 2008 v zvezi z vprašanjem pomanjkanja preglednosti in zavračanja posredovanja informacij.
The Committee on Petitions encourages the Ombudsman to use his own-initiative power to tackle systemic problems within the institutions, as he did in 2009 regarding a lack of transparency and refusal to provide information.
Z izraženo podporo varuhu človekovih pravic sta Evropski parlament in Odbor za peticije pokazala svoje zaupanje v njegovo delo in napore za izboljšanje storitev, ki jih lahko nudi državljanom, s čimer krepi njihovo zaupanje v Evropsko unijo in njene institucije ter njihovo podobo.
By supporting the Ombudsman, the European Parliament and its Committee on Petitions have demonstrated their confidence in his work and his efforts to improve the service that he can provide for citizens, thus strengthening their trust in the European Union and its institutions and improving their image of them.
o prihodnosti evropske standardizacije
on the future of European standardisation
Poročevalec: Edvard Kožušník
Rapporteur: Edvard Kožušník
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................23
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............23
– ob upoštevanju javne razprave o prihodnosti evropske standardizacije, ki jo je 23. junija 2010 pripravil Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov,
– having regard to the public hearing on the future of European standardisation held by its Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection on 23 June 2010,
– ob upoštevanju odzivov na javno posvetovanje Komisije o pregledu evropskega standardizacijskega sistema (ki je potekalo od 23. marca do 21. maja 2010),
– having regard to the responses to the Commission’s public consultation on the review of the European standardisation system (held from 23 March to 21 May 2010),
– ob upoštevanju študije o oceni učinka na temo „standardizacijskega svežnja“, ki jo je izvedel generalni direktorat Komisije za podjetništvo in industrijo (9. marca 2010),
– having regard to the impact assessment study on the ‘Standardisation Package’ carried out for the Commission Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry (9 March 2010),
– ob upoštevanju poročila skupine strokovnjakov za pregled evropskega standardizacijskega sistema (EXPRESS) z naslovom „Standardizacija za konkurenčno in inovativno Evropo: vizija za leto 2020“ (iz februarja 2010),
– having regard to the report of the Expert Panel for the Review of the European Standardisation System (EXPRESS) entitled ‘Standardisation for a competitive and innovative Europe: a vision for 2020’ (February 2010),
– ob upoštevanju poročila profesorja Maria Montija predsedniku Komisije z naslovom „Nova strategija za enotni trg“ z dne 9. maja 2010,
– having regard to Professor Mario Monti’s report of 9 May 2010 to the President of the Commission entitled ‘A New Strategy for the Single Market’,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 3. marca 2010 z naslovom „Evropa 2020: strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 3 March 2010 on ‘Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
– ob upoštevanju študije o dostopu malih in srednjih podjetij do evropske standardizacije iz avgusta 2009, ki sta jo naročila Evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN) ter Evropski odbor za standardizacijo v elektrotehniki (CENELEC), pri čemer gre za omogočanje malim in srednjim podjetjem, da bi imela večjo korist od standardov in udeležbe v standardizaciji,
– having regard to the study on SME access to European standardisation, entitled ‘Enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to achieve greater benefit from standards and from involvement in standardisation’, commissioned by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) and the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation (CENELEC) (August 2009),
– ob upoštevanju študije o dostopu do standardizacije, ki jo je izvedel generalni direktorat Komisije za podjetništvo in industrijo (10. marca 2010),
– having regard to the study on access to standardisation carried out for the Commission Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry (10 March 2009),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2009 o izvajanju Direktive 98/34/ES v obdobju 2006–2008 ( KOM(2009)0690 ) ter priloženega delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije ( SEC(2009)1704 ),
– having regard to the Commission report of 21 December 2009 on the operation of Directive 98/34/EC from 2006 to 2008 ( COM(2009)0690 ) and to the accompanying Commission staff working document ( SEC(2009)1704 ),
– ob upoštevanju bele knjige z dne 3. julija 2009 z naslovom „Posodobitev standardizacije IKT v EU – pot naprej“ ( KOM(2009)0324 ),
– having regard to the white paper of 3 July 2009 on ‘Modernising ICT Standardisation in the EU – The Way Forward’ ( COM(2009)0324 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 25. septembra 2008 o standardizaciji in inovacijah,
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 25 September 2008 on standardisation and innovation,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. junija 2008 z naslovom „Najprej pomisli na male – Akt za mala podjetja za Evropo“ ( KOM(2008)0394 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 25 June 2008 entitled ‘Think Small First’ - A ‘Small Business Act’ for Europe’ ( COM(2008)0394 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. marca 2008 z naslovom „Za večji prispevek standardizacije k inovacijam v Evropi“ ( KOM(2008)0133 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 11 March 2008 entitled ‘Towards an increased contribution from standardisation to innovation in Europe’ ( COM(2008)0133 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 18. oktobra 2004 o vlogi evropske standardizacije v okviru evropskih politik in zakonodaje ( KOM(2004)0674 ) ter priloženega delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o izzivih evropske standardizacije,
– having regard to the Commission communication of 18 October 2004 on the role of European standardisation in the framework of European policies and legislation ( COM(2004)0674 ) and the accompanying Commission staff working document entitled ‘The challenges for European standardisation’,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. februarja 2004 o vključevanju okoljskih vidikov v evropsko standardizacijo ( KOM(2004)0130 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 25 February 2004 entitled ‘Integration of Environmental Aspects into European Standardisation’ ( COM(2004)0130 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 26. julija 2001 o načelih evropske politike o mednarodni standardizaciji ( SEC(2001)1296 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document of 26 July 2001 on ‘European Policy Principles on International Standardisation’ ( SEC(2001)1296 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. februarja 1999 o poročilu Komisije o učinkovitosti in odgovornosti na področju evropske standardizacije v okviru novega pristopa
– having regard to its resolution of 12 February 1999 on the Commission report on efficiency and accountability in European standardisation under the New Approach
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 13. maja 1998 o učinkovitosti in odgovornosti na področju evropske standardizacije v okviru novega pristopa ( KOM(1998)0291 ),
– having regard to the Commission report of 13 May 1998 on efficiency and accountability in European standardisation under the New Approach ( COM(1998)0291 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1673/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o financiranju evropske standardizacije
– having regard to Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 on the financing of European standardisation
UL L 315, 15.11.2006, str.
OJ L 315, 15.11.2006, p.