natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(g) izboljšanje preglednosti in odgovornosti v odnosih med institucijami EU in državljani, civilno družbo, političnimi strankami in nacionalnimi parlamenti.
(g) improving transparency and accountability in the relations between the EU institutions and individual citizens, civil society, political parties and national parliaments.
V tem pogledu je velikega pomena posebna ureditev, ki je bila vzpostavljena za vrednotenje politik, ki se nanašajo na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, v EU, ker bo na pregleden način vključila Komisijo, nacionalne vlade, Evropski parlament in nacionalne parlamente.
In this regard, the fact that, for policies related to the area of freedom, security and justice, a specific regime has been established whereby the Commission, Member State governments and the European and national parliaments are to be involved in assessing the impact of these policies within the EU is extremely beneficial.
Parlament glede dobrega upravljanja v EU poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj pospešita posvetovanje o praktičnem izvajanju načrtovanega evropskega javnega tožilstva, kot glavnega pogoja za uresničevanje ciljev iz prvega stavka te točke;
As regards good governance within the EU, Parliament calls on the Commission and the Council to speed up the deliberations on the practical implementation of the plan to establish a European Public Prosecutor's Office, as a main prerequisite for the realisation of the goals set out in the first sentence of this point;
(a) v skladu s členom 10 protokola o prehodnih določbah pogodbe bodo ukrepi, sprejeti v okviru tretjega stebra, še pet let od začetka veljavnosti pogodbe pod nadzorom Komisije in Sodišča.
(a) according to Article 10 of the Protocol on transitional provisions to the Treaty, the measures adopted under the third pillar regime will, for a period of five years after the entry into force of the new Treaty, remain beyond the control of the Commission and, moreover, of the Court of Justice.
Nerazumljivo je, zakaj so se države odločile, da bodo za tako dolgo obdobje podaljšale stanje, ki ga same priznavajo za nezakonitega.
It is hard to understand why the Member States decided to protract for such a long period a situation which they themselves recognised as being legally flawed.
Vprašanje je, kako čim bolj zmanjšati negativni vpliv na državljane EU:
The question is now how to minimize the negative impact for EU citizens:
- prvi odgovor daje že protokol, ki določa, da za spremenjene akte prehodno obdobje ne velja.
- an initial answer to this is to be found in the aforesaid Protocol, which provides that, where an act is amended, the transitional period will no longer apply to the amended act.
Institucije bi se morale vprašati, ali ne bi bilo bolje takoj po začetku veljavnosti nove pogodbe spremeniti nekatere obstoječe, manj zadovoljive ukrepe tretjega stebra;
The institutions should now decide whether it may not be better immediately after the entry into force of the new Treaty to amend some of the pre-existing, less satisfactory third-pillar measures;
- drugi odgovor bi lahko bil, da se uradno sprejetje ukrepov, ki temeljijo na tretjem stebru in lahko vplivajo na temeljne pravice državljanov, preloži na obdobje med 1. januarjem in majem 2009.
- a further solution could be to postpone until the period from 1 January to May 2009 the formal adoption of measures which are currently founded on the third pillar and which may affect the fundamental rights of citizens.
Nekaj mesecev zamude bo za državljane EU razumljivo, če bodo nova pravila izvršljiva pred evropskim sodiščem;
A few months' delay will be easily comprehensible to EU citizens if the new rules will be enforceable before the European judicature;
(b) uvedene so bile dokaj zapletene določbe za primer, ko država članica meni, da bi osnutek direktive prizadel temeljne vidike njenega kazenskopravnega sistema, ali ko ni mogoče doseči soglasja (policijsko sodelovanje).
(b) somewhat complex new provisions are introduced to cater for the situation where a Member State considers that a draft directive would affect fundamental aspects of its criminal justice system or where it is not possible to reach unanimity (police cooperation).
V takšnih okoliščinah lahko država članica zahteva, da se predlog direktive predloži Evropskemu svetu.
In those circumstances, the Member State in question may request that the draft directive be referred to the European Council.
Prvi razlog je popolnoma razumljiv in celo upravičen, ker bi veljal tudi za položaj, ko bi država članica tvegala znatno zmanjšanje varstva temeljnih pravic, drugi pa je bolj problem ravnovesja moči.
The first reason is perfectly understandable and even justifiable, as would be the case also for other situations where a Member State is confronted by the risk of a substantial reduction in the protection of fundamental rights; the second one is more a problem of a balance of powers.
V teh primerih se „redni“ zakonodajni postopek prekine za štiri mesece.
In these cases, the "ordinary" legislative procedure will be suspended for four months.
Če sporazuma ni mogoče doseči in če želi najmanj devet držav članic na podlagi zadevnega osnutka direktive vzpostaviti okrepljeno sodelovanje, se šteje, da je pooblastilo za nadaljevanje okrepljenega sodelovanja dano (zato soglasje Parlamenta, kot zahteva člen 280 Pogodbe o ES, ni potrebno).
In case of disagreement, and if at least nine Member States wish to establish enhanced cooperation on the basis of the draft directive concerned, the authorisation to proceed on the basis enhanced cooperation will be deemed to have been granted (and so would not need Parliament's consent, as required by Article 280 of the EC Treaty).
Če se uporablja redni postopek, je treba poudariti, da bo moral biti ukrep vseeno sprejet v postopku soodločanja s Parlamentom;
However, where the ordinary procedure applies, it is important to stress that the adoption of the measure itself would still require codecision in conjunction with Parliament;
(c) sistem vključitve in zavrnitve bo postal še bolj zapleten.
(c) the system of opt-ins and opt-outs will become even more complex.
Čeprav nove določbe o okrepljenem sodelovanju ne bodo veljale za ukrepe, ki gradijo na schengenskem pravnem redu, bo schengenska ureditev spremenjena (glej spodaj).
Although the new provisions on enhanced cooperation will not apply to measures which build on the Schengen acquis , the Schengen regime will be modified (see below).
Poleg tega se bodo druge možnosti zavrnitve, ki veljajo za ukrepe v zvezi s schengenskim pravnim redom, na primer pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah, razširile na pravosodno in policijsko sodelovanje (glej spremembe k schengenskim protokolom ter stališče Združenega kraljestva, Irske in Danske);
Furthermore, the other opt‑outs which apply to non-Schengen related measures, such as judicial cooperation in civil matters, will be extended to apply to police and judicial cooperation (see the modifications to the protocols on Schengen and the position of the United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark);
(d) glede posebnega položaja Združenega kraljestva in Irske je treba opozoriti, da Evropski parlament ni bil zaprošen za mnenje, ko je bil v letih 2000 in 2001 sprejet poseben položaj za ti dve državi v schengenski ureditvi.
(d) as far as the particular situation of the United Kingdom and Ireland is concerned, it must be recalled that Parliament was not formally consulted when a separate regime was decided for those countries in the Schengen regime in 2000 and 2001.
Zdaj mora Združeno kraljestvo sodelovati na področjih, kjer je vključeno v schengenski pravni red, na področjih, kjer ni, pa mu ni treba.
The current situation is that, where the United Kingdom has opted into the Schengen acquis , it must participate, and where it has not opted in, it may not participate
Svet zato Združenemu kraljestvu ni dovolil sodelovanja pri vzpostavitvi Frontexa in sprejetju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2252/2004 z dne 13. decembra 2004 o standardih za varnostne značilnosti in biometrične podatke v potnih listih in potovalnih dokumentih, ki jih izdajo države članice, Združeno kraljestvo pa je vložilo tožbi proti Svetu (zadevi C-77/05 – Združeno kraljestvo proti Svetu [2007] ECR I-0000 in C-137/05 – Združeno kraljestvo proti Svetu [2007] ECR I-0000).
As a result, the Council has not permitted the UK to participate in the creation of Frontex and in the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 2253/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States, and the UK has brought two actions against the Council (Cases C-77/05 United Kingdom v Council [2007] ECR I-0000 and C-137/05 United Kingdom v Council [2007] ECR I-0000). .
Sprememba schengenskega protokola tega vidika ne bo spremenila, Združenemu kraljestvu in Irski pa bo omogočila, da ne bosta sodelovala pri ukrepu, ki temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu in v katerega sta se že vključila.
The modifications to the Schengen protocol will not change this aspect, but will add the possibility for the United Kingdom and Ireland to decline to participate in a measure building on the Schengen acquis in respect of which they have already opted in.
To bo verjetno povzročilo nadaljnjo razdrobljenost pravil.
This is likely to cause further fragmentation of the rules.
Parlament ne bo zaprošen za mnenje glede sodelovanja pri ukrepu in glede vpliva na schengenski pravni red.
Parliament will not be consulted in relation to participation in a measure and the effect on Schengen acquis .
Kljub temu bo treba ukrep še vedno sprejeti s soodločanjem, kjer je ta postopek predpisan;
None the less, the actual measure will still need to be adopted by codecision, where the codecision procedure applies;
(e) poleg tega bosta lahko Združeno kraljestvo in Irska zavrnila sodelovanje pri predlogih za spremembo ukrepov iz naslova IV, čeprav sta se prej že odločila za sodelovanje, in ju ne bodo zavezovala nova pravila o varstvu podatkov, ki so bila sprejeta na osnovi določbe nove pogodbe, po kateri Združeno kraljestvo in Irska nista zavezana vsebinskim pravilom o policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah;
(e) Furthermore, the UK and Ireland will be able to opt out of proposals to amend Title IV measures in respect of which they have previously opted in, and they will not be bound by new data protection rules adopted on the basis of the new treaty provision exempting the UK and Ireland from the substantive rules on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters;
Institucije EU bi morale narediti vse, kar je v njihovi moči, da bodo novo pogodbo vse države članice uspešno ratificirale, ter:
The EU institutions should now do their utmost to secure the successful ratification of the new Treaty by the Member States.
(b) vključiti nacionalne parlamente v opredelitev prihodnjega večletnega programa v območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, meni, da bi lahko ta vključitev najustrezneje potekala prek
(b) associate the national parliaments in the definition of the next multi-annual programme in the area of freedom, security and justice; this association could most appropriately take place through:
- neformalnih forumov (kakor je skupina Future, ki se bo redno sestajala med predsedstvi Sveta v letih 2008 in 2009);
- informal fora (such as the "Future" Group which will meet periodically during the four Council Presidencies in 2008 and 2009);
- formalnega, rednega in pravočasnega posredovanja vseh pripravljalnih besedil zakonodajnih aktov, od začetnih zakonodajnih predlogov, da bi se izognili diskriminaciji med nacionalnimi poslanci in evropskimi državljani;
- the formal, regular and timely transmission of all legislative preparatory texts, from the original legislative proposals onwards, in order to avoid discrimination between national parliamentarians and between European citizens;
(c) v letu 2008 voditi pogajanja o sprejetju vseh potrebnih ukrepov v začetku leta 2009, ki bodo potrebni za uspešen začetek novega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki ga bo razglasil novoizvoljeni Parlament v letu 2010; ob upoštevanju nacionalnih in/ali parlamentarnih zadržkov, izraženih glede števila zakonodajnih postopkov, poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj z vidika nove pravne podlage, ki jo uvaja lizbonska pogodba, in rezultatov politične razprave ponovno preučita naslednja zakonodajna besedila:
(c) conduct in 2008 the negotiations for the adoption at the beginning of 2009 of all the necessary measures needed for the successful launch by the new elected Parliament, commencing in 2010, of the new area of freedom, security and justice; bearing in mind the national and/or parliamentary reservations expressed in respect of a number of legislative procedures, invites the Commission and the Council to re-examine, from the perspective of the new legal bases introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon and taking stock of the political debate, the following legislative texts;
Splošne pravice
General rights
- okvirni sklep o procesnih pravicah ( 2004/0113(CNS) ),
- Framework Decision on procedural rights ( 2004/0113(CNS) )
- okvirni sklep o varstvu podatkov v varnostne namene (se vključi v revizijo direktive 95/46) ( 2005/0202(CNS) ) (parlamentarni pridržki Danske, Irske, Nizozemske, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva),
- Framework Decision on data protection for security purposes (to be integrated into the revision of Directive 95/46/EC) ( 2005/0202(CNS) ) (parliamentary reservations from DK, IE, NL, SE and UK)
- okvirni sklep o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji ( 2007/2067(CNS) ) (parlamentarni pridržki Švedske, Nizozemske, Danske, Irske in Latvije),
- Framework Decision on racism and xenophobia ( 2007/2067(CNS) ) (parliamentary reservations from SE, NL, DK, IE and LV)
- okvirni sklep o sklepih „v odsotnosti“ (še ni predložen),
- Framework Decision on decisions adopted "in absentia"(still to be submitted)
- okvirni sklep o evropskem dokaznem nalogu ( 2003/0270(CNS) ) (parlamentarni pridržki Švedske in Danske),
- Framework Decision on the European evidence warrant ( 2003/0270(CNS) ) (parliamentary reservations from.
- okvirni sklep o nalogih za nadzor v predsodnih postopkih ( 2006/0158(CNS) ),
- Framework Decision on supervision orders in pre-trial procedures ( 2006/0158(CNS) )
- okvirni sklep o izmenjavi podatkov iz kazenskih evidenc ( 2005/0267(CNS) ) (parlamentarni pridržki Švedske, Finske, Nizozemske, Irske, Grčije in Danske),
- Framework Decision on the exchange of information extracted from criminal records ( 2005/0267(CNS) ) (parliamentary reservations from SE, FI, NL, IE, EL and DK)
- okvirni sklep o Eurojustu (še ni predložen),
- Framework Decision on EUROJUST (still to be submitted)
- okvirni sklep o boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu (parlamentarni pridržek Švedske),
- Framework Decision on fighting organised crime (parliamentary reservation from SE)
- okvirni sklep o dostopu do vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS) v varnostne namene (se vključi kot predlog spremembe uredbe o VIS) ( 2005/0232(CNS) ),
- Framework Decision on access to VIS data for security purposes (to be integrated as an amendment to the VIS Regulation) ( 2005/0232(CNS) )
- okvirni sklep o dostopu do Eurodaca v varnostne namene (se vključi kot predlog spremembe uredbe o VIS) ( 2006/0310(CNS) ),
- Framework Decision on access to EURODAC for security purposes (to be integrated as an amendment to the VIS regulation) ( 2006/0310(CNS) )
5. pozdravlja izjavo konference glede člena 10 protokola o prehodnih določbah (izjava 39a) in poziva Komisijo, naj začne že v letu 2008 pripravljati predlog spremembe ali nadomestitve pravnih aktov, ki so se že pokazali kot nezadovoljivi ali neučinkoviti (na primer konvencije o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah ali drugih besedil, pri katerih izkušnja kaže, da jih je treba izboljšati);
Welcomes the Conference Declaration concerning Article 10 of the Protocol on transitional provisions (Declaration 39a), and invites the Commission to start work, as early as 2008, on the amendment or replacement of legal acts which already appear unsatisfactory or ineffective (such as the Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters or other texts which experience shows should be improved);
Alexander Alvaro, Roberta Angelilli, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giuseppe Castiglione, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Armando França, Urszula Gacek, Kinga Gál, Roland Gewalt, Ewa Klamt, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Sarah Ludford, Viktória Mohácsi, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu, Martine Roure, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Vladimir Uručev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Alexander Alvaro, Roberta Angelilli, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giuseppe Castiglione, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Armando França, Urszula Gacek, Kinga Gál, Roland Gewalt, Ewa Klamt, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Sarah Ludford, Viktória Mohácsi, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu, Martine Roure, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Vladimir Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
o evropski trajnostni prometni politiki ob upoštevanju evropskih energetskih in okoljskih politik
on sustainable European transport policy, taking into account European energy and environment policies
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................16
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 15
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................20
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............19
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................24
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................23
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva po zasedanju Evropskega sveta 8. in 9. marca 2007 v zvezi s sprejetjem evropskega akcijskega načrta (2007–2009) Evropskega sveta z naslovom "Energetska politika za Evropo" (7224/1/07),
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions issued following the European Council of 8 and 9 March 2007, relating to the European Council’s adoption of a ‘European Council Action Plan (2007-2009)’ entitled ‘Energy policy for Europe’ (7224/1/07),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "Sporočilo o politiki evropskih pristanišč" ( KOM(2007)0616 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Communication on a European ports policy’ ( COM(2007)0616 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "K železniškemu omrežju, namenjenemu predvsem tovornemu prometu" ( KOM(2007)0608 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Towards a rail network giving priority to freight’ ( COM(2007)0608 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Akcijski načrt za logistiko tovornega prometa" ( KOM(2007)0607 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Freight Transport Logistics Action Plan’ ( COM(2007)0607 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Agenda EU za tovorni promet: Izboljšanje učinkovitosti, povezanosti in trajnosti tovornega prometa v Evropi" ( KOM(2007)0606 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘The EU's freight transport agenda: Boosting the efficiency, integration and sustainability of freight transport in Europe’ ( COM(2007)0606 ),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z naslovom "Za novo kulturo mobilnosti v mestih" ( KOM(2007)0551 ),
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper entitled ‘Towards a new culture for urban mobility’ ( COM(2007)0551 ),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije o tržnih instrumentih za namene okoljske politike in z njo povezanih politik ( KOM(2007)0140 ),
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes ( COM(2007)0140 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Konkurenčen ureditveni okvir za avtomobilsko industrijo v 21. stoletju – Stališče Komisije o končnem poročilu skupine na visoki ravni CARS 21 – Prispevek k strategiji EU za rast in delovna mesta" ( KOM(2007)0022 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘A Competitive Automotive Regulatory Framework for the 21 st Century – Commission’s position on the CARS 21 High Level Group Final Report – A contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy’ ( COM(2007)0022 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Rezultati pregleda strategije Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 iz osebnih vozil in lahkih tovornih vozil" ( KOM(2007)0019 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Results of the review of the Community Strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles’ ( COM(2007)0019 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Omejevanje globalnih podnebnih sprememb na 2 stopinji Celzija – Pot do leta 2020 in naprej" ( KOM(2007)0002 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 degrees Celsius – The way ahead for 2020 and beyond’ ( COM(2007)0002 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Energetska politika za Evropo" ( KOM(2007)0001 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘An Energy Policy for Europe’ ( COM(2007)0001 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Časovni načrt obnovljive energije - Obnovljiva energija v 21. stoletju: izgradnja trajnejše prihodnosti" ( KOM(2006)0848 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Renewable Energy Road Map – Renewable energies in the 21 st century: building a more sustainable future’ ( COM(2006)0848 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "Poročilo o napredku na področju biogoriv: Poročilo o napredku pri uporabi biogoriv in drugih obnovljivih goriv v državah članicah Evropske unije" ( KOM(2006)0845 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Biofuels Progress Report: Report on the progress made in the use of biofuels and other renewable fuels in the Member States of the European Union’ ( COM(2006)0845 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Akcijski načrt za energetsko učinkovitost: uresničitev možnosti" ( KOM(2006)0545 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Action Plan for Energy Efficiency: Realising the Potential’ ( COM(2006)0545 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Naj Evropa ostane v gibanju – Trajnostna mobilnost za našo celino – Vmesni pregled bele knjige Evropske komisije o prometu iz leta 2001" ( KOM(2006)0314 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Keep Europe moving – Sustainable mobility for our continent – Mid-term review of the European Commission’s 2001 Transport White Paper’ ( COM(2006)0314 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. oktobra 2007 o strategiji Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisijo CO 2 iz osebnih vozil in lahkih tovornih vozil
– having regard to its resolution of 24 October 2007 on the Community Strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2007)0469 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2007)0469 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. septembra 2007 o logistiki tovornega prometa v Evropi – ključu do trajnostne mobilnosti
– having regard to its resolution of 5 September 2007 on freight transport logistics in Europe – the key to sustainable mobility
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2007)0375 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2007)0375 . ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 12. julija 2007 z naslovom "Naj Evropa ostane v gibanju – Trajnostna mobilnost za našo celino"
– having regard to its resolution of 12 July 2007 on keeping Europe moving – sustainable mobility for our continent
Sprejeta besedila , P6–TA(2007)0345. ,
Texts Adopted , P6-TA(2007)0345 . ,