natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Namen tega poročila je prispevati k potekajoči razpravi o pregledu evropskega standardizacijskega sistema.
The purpose of this report is to contribute to the ongoing debate on the review of the European standardisation system.
Evropska komisija pripravlja standardizacijski sveženj, ki bo vključeval zakonodajni predlog, katerega namen bo revizija obstoječega pravnega okvira evropske standardizacije
The European Commission is currently working on a ‘Standardisation Package’, which will include a legislative proposal aimed to revise the existing legal framework on European standardisation
– Sklep Sveta 87/95/EGS z dne 22. decembra 1986 o standardizaciji na področju informacijske tehnologije in telekomunikacij
- Council Decision 87/95/EEC of 22 December 1986 on standardisation in the field of information technology and telecommunications
– Direktiva 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1988 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov
- Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations
– Sklep št. 1673/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o financiranju Evropske standardizacije. , ter krovno sporočilo, s katerim bo določila standardizacijsko politiko v naslednjem desetletju.
- Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 on the financing of European standardisation and an umbrella Communication which will set the standardisation policy for the next decade.
Komisija je pri pripravi svojega standardizacijskega svežnja za strateška priporočila zaprosila ključne strokovnjake.
In preparation of its ‘Standardisation Package’, the Commission has asked key experts to make strategic recommendations.
Ti so se združili v skupino strokovnjakov za pregled evropskega standardizacijskega sistema (EXPRESS), ki je svoja priporočila podala februarja 2010 v obliki priporočila z naslovom „Standardizacija za konkurenčno in inovativno Evropo: vizija za leto 2020“.
These experts have been brought together in the Expert Panel for the Review of the European Standardisation System (EXPRESS) which has delivered its recommendations in February 2010 in the form of a report entitled ‘Standardisation for a competitive and innovative Europe: a vision for 2020’.
Komisija je tudi pripravila javno posvetovanje o pregledu evropskega standardizacijskega sistema (ki je potekalo od 23. marca do 21. maja 2010) in naročila študijo o oceni učinka (9. marca 2010).
The Commission has also undertaken a public consultation on the review of the European standardisation system (held from 23 March to 21 May 2010), and commissioned an Impact Assessment Study (9 March 2010).
Standardizacijski sveženj, ki je v pripravi, bo temeljil tudi na beli knjigi z dne 3. julija 2009 z naslovom „Posodobitev standardizacije IKT v EU – pot naprej“.
The forthcoming ‘Standardisation Package’ will also build on the White Paper of 3 July 2009 on Modernising ICT Standardisation in the EU – The Way Forward.
Splošne pripombe poročevalca
Rapporteur's general remarks
Poročevalec pozdravlja namero Komisije, da opravi pregled evropskega standardizacijskega sistema, zato da bi ohranila številne njegove uspešne sestavine, izboljšala pomanjkljivosti in vzpostavila pravo ravnovesje med evropsko in nacionalno razsežnostjo.
The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission's intention to review the European standardisation system with a view to preserving its many successful elements, improving its deficiencies and striking the right balance between the European and national dimensions.
Treba je poudariti, da bi moral predlagani pregled temeljiti na prednostih obstoječega sistema, ki pomenijo trdno podlago za izboljšanje, pri čemer se je treba vzdržati korenitih sprememb, ki bi spodkopale njegove osrednje vrednote.
It should be emphasised that the proposed review should build on the strengths of the existing system which constitute a solid base for improvement, refraining from any radical changes that would undermine its core values.
V zvezi s tem se poročevalec ne strinja s številnimi možnimi politikami, ki jih vsebuje študija Komisije o oceni učinka, ker bi to pomenilo popolno prenovitev sistema.
In that respect, the Rapporteur does not agree with a number of policy options contained in the Commission's impact assessment study which would result in a complete overhaul of the system.
Pri pripravi tega osnutka poročila je poročevalec upošteval ugotovitve iz poročila skupine strokovnjakov za pregled evropskega standardizacijskega sistema, ki vsebuje številna pomembna priporočila.
In drafting this report, the Rapporteur took into consideration the findings of the EXPRESS Report which contains a number of significant recommendations.
Vendar poročevalec ugotavlja, da tej skupini strokovnjakov ni vedno uspelo pripraviti izvirnih priporočil ali doseči soglasja o ključnih vprašanjih, čemur so pretežno vzrok različna in včasih nasprotujoča si mnenja njenih članov.
The Rapporteur notes, however, that EXPRESS has not always succeeded in producing original recommendations or reaching a consensus on key issues, which is mainly explained by the different, and, at times, conflicting, views reflected in its membership.
Poročevalec je prav tako upošteval odzive na javno posvetovanje Komisije o pregledu evropskega standardizacijskega sistema ter sklepe javne predstavitve o prihodnosti evropske standardizacije, ki jo je odbor IMCO pripravil 23. junija 2010.
The Rapporteur took also into account the responses to the Commission’s public consultation on the review of the European standardisation system, and the conclusions of the Public Hearing on the Future of European Standardisation which was organised by the IMCO Committee on 23 June 2010.
Poročevalec se je tudi imel priložnost sestati s predstavniki mednarodnih organizacij za standardizacijo, in sicer v okviru obiska delegacije odbora IMCO v Ženevi (25. in 26. maja 2010), ter se je obširno posvetoval z evropskimi in nacionalnimi organi za standardizacijo ter ključnimi interesnimi skupinami, vključenimi v postopek razvijanja standardov.
The Rapporteur has had also the opportunity to meet with representatives of international standardisation organisations in the context of an IMCO Delegation visit to Geneva (25-26 May 2010), and has consulted extensively with representatives of European and national standardisation bodies and key stakeholders involved in the standards development process.
Celotnega potenciala enotnega trga ni mogoče uresničiti brez podpore sodobnega standardizacijskega postopka.
The full potential of the single market cannot be released without the support of a modern standardisation process.
Evropski standardizacijski sistem je bil bistvena prvina pri ustvarjanju enotnega trga, zlasti zaradi uporabe standardov na ključnih zakonodajnih področjih na podlagi novega pristopa.
The European standardisation system has been a central element in the delivery of the single market, in particular, through the use of standards in key legislative areas under the ‘New Approach’.
Ta zakonodajna metoda je bila bistvena pri vzpostavljanju inovacijam prijazne pravne ureditve, kjer tehnične specifikacije, ki omogočajo skladnost s pravnimi zahtevami, razvijejo interesne skupine same in jih posodabljajo glede na zadnje stanje tehničnega razvoja.
This legislative technique has been instrumental in putting in place innovation-friendly regulation, where technical specifications allowing compliance with legal requirements are developed by the interested parties themselves and updated according to the ‘state of the art’.
Vzajemno dogovorjeni prostovoljni standardi so omogočili boljšo pravno ureditev, spodbudili konkurenčnost podjetij in odpravili trgovinske ovire.
Mutually agreed voluntary standards have enabled better regulation, stimulated business competitiveness and removed barriers to trade.
Standardizacija ima ključno vlogo pri podpiranju naraščajočih potreb v evropskih politikah in zakonodaji glede standardov, s katerimi bi zagotovili varnost proizvodov, dostopnost, inovacije, medsebojno povezljivost in varstvo okolja.
Standardisation plays a key role in supporting the increasing needs of European policy and legislation for standards capable of ensuring product safety, accessibility, innovation, interoperability and environmental protection.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da se je v zadnjih letih povečalo število standardov v podporo zakonodaji na področjih, ki presegajo tista na podlagi novega pristopa, kar kaže, da je bil ta model sprejet v številnih politikah EU.
The Rapporteur notes that the number of standards supporting legislation beyond the scope of the ‘New Approach’ has increased over the last years, which shows that this model has been adopted across a broad range of EU policies.
Zaželena je razširitev uporabe standardov na druga področja zakonodaje in politik Unije, pri čemer je treba upoštevati posebne značilnosti zadevnih področij v skladu z načeli boljše zakonodaje.
The extension of the use of standards in new areas of Union legislation and policies is desirable, taking into account the specificities of the areas concerned in accordance with the principles of better regulation.
Poročevalec je v ta osnutek poročila vključil številna posebna priporočila, naslovljena na države članice, Evropsko komisijo ter evropske in nacionalne organe za standardizacijo, da bi okrepili sedanji evropski standardizacijski sistem.
The Rapporteur has included in this draft report a number of specific recommendations addressed to Member States, the European Commission and the European and national standardisation bodies, with the view to empowering the current European standardisation system.
Treba je opozoriti, da se veliko teh predlogov nanaša zlasti na usklajene/mandatirane standarde, ki naj bi podprli zakonodajo in politike EU ter so zato bistveni za javni interes.
It should be highlighted that many of these proposals apply in particular to harmonised/mandated standards, which are intended to support EU legislation and policies, and are therefore key to the public interest.
Da bi poročevalec olajšal razpravo v odboru, se želi v tej obrazložitvi osredotočiti na nekatera priporočila iz poročila.
In this explanatory statement, the Rapporteur would like to focus on certain recommendations contained in the report in order to facilitate the discussions in the committee.
Okrepitev načela nacionalnih delegacij
Enhancing the national delegation principle
Čeprav so nacionalni organi za standarde bistveni element evropskega standardizacijskega sistema, obstajajo med njimi številne razlike glede sredstev, strokovnih izkušenj in znanja ter udeleženosti interesnih skupin.
Although National Standards Bodies (NSBs) constitute the backbone of the European standardisation system, there are significant differences among them in terms of resources, technical expertise and stakeholder engagement.
Zaradi teh neenakosti nastaja veliko neravnovesje v njihovi udeležbi v evropskem standardizacijskem sistemu.
These inequalities create a significant imbalance in their participation in the European standardisation system.
Komisija, države članice in evropske organizacije za standardizacijo bi morale sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi šibkejši nacionalni organi za standarde prevzeli dejavnejšo vlogo v standardizacijskem postopku.
The Commission, the Member States and the European Standardisation Organisations (ESOs) should take all necessary measures in order to enable the weaker NSBs to assume a more active role in the standardisation process.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da javni organi v večini držav članic kažejo omejeno zanimanje za udeležbo pri postopku razvijanja standardov, ne glede na pomembnost standardizacije kot orodja za podporo zakonodaji in javnim politikam.
It should be also emphasised that in most Member States public authorities show a limited interest in participating in the standards development process, notwithstanding the importance of standardisation as tool to support legislation and public policies.
Države članice, še posebej pa organi za nadzor trga, bi morali poslati predstavnike, ki bi sodelovali v vseh nacionalnih tehničnih odborih, ki odražajo razvoj standardov v podporo politikam in zakonodaji EU.
Member States, and in particular market surveillance authorities, should send representatives to take part in all national technical committees mirroring the development of standards in support of EU policies and legislation.
Načelo nacionalnih delegacij je temelj evropskega standardizacijskega sistema, zlasti pri postopku razvijanja standardov Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo in Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo v elektrotehniki.
The principle of national delegation is a cornerstone of the European standardisation system, particularly in the standards development process of CEN and CENELEC.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da – kot je bilo potrjeno v študiji o dostopu do standardizacije – v veliki večini evropskih držav socialne interesne skupine pri oblikovanju standardov sodelujejo zelo malo ali pa sploh ne.
It should be, however, emphasised that – as confirmed in the Study on Access to Standardisation – in the vast majority of European countries, the participation of societal stakeholders in the standard-setting process is non-existent or remains at a very low level.
Z redkimi omembe vrednimi izjemami je nacionalno strokovno znanje potrošniških organizacij v standardizaciji ponavadi razdrobljeno med številne organe ali pa ga preprosto sploh ni, medtem ko je v tistih redkih državah, kjer je potrošniško sodelovanje učinkovito na nacionalni ravni, njihovo mnenje pri oblikovanju nacionalnega stališča pogosto prezrto.
With few notable exceptions, national consumer expertise in standardisation is usually fragmented across many bodies or simply does not exist, whereas in those few countries where consumer participation is effective at national level, their view may often be filtered out in the development of the national position.
Položaj je še toliko bolj nezadovoljiv, če pogledamo udeležbo interesnih skupin, ki zastopajo okoljske interese: zaenkrat sta samo dve državi članici, v katerih okoljske organizacije sistematično prispevajo k ustvarjanju standardov.
The situation is even more unsatisfactory when it comes to the participation of stakeholders representing environmental interests: there are currently only two Member States in which environmental organisations contribute systematically to the standard-setting process.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti učinkovito zastopanje vseh pomembnih interesnih skupin v nacionalnih tehničnih odborih, in sicer tako, da vzpostavijo mehanizme za spremljanje in poročanje ter po potrebi zagotovijo finančno podporo za šibkejše socialne interesne skupine, zato da bi jim olajšale udeležbo.
Member States should ensure effective representation of all relevant stakeholders on national technical committees by establishing monitoring and reporting mechanisms and providing, where necessary, financial support to weaker stakeholders in order to facilitate their participation.
Izboljšanje dostopa do standardizacijskega postopka
Improving access to the standardisation process
Udeležba socialnih interesnih skupin – ki zastopajo zdravstvene in varnostne, potrošniške ter okoljske interese – sistemu daje pomemben vidik legitimnosti in odgovornosti ter izboljšuje kakovost soglasja, evropski standardi pa zaradi tega temeljijo na širši zastopanosti.
The participation of societal stakeholders - representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests - offers to the system a significant aspect of legitimacy and accountability, improves the quality of the consensus and renders European standards more representative.
Evropske organizacije, ki zastopajo družbene interese, morajo zaradi tega dobiti močnejšo vlogo znotraj evropskih organizacij za standardizacijo, da bi bolje odražale stališča posameznih interesnih skupin, ki so še vedno šibke na nacionalni ravni.
The European organisations representing societal interests must therefore obtain a stronger role within the European Standardisation Organisations (ESOs) in order to better reflect the views of the respective stakeholders that remain weak at national level.
Med drugim bi jim lahko podelili dejansko članstvo v evropskih organizacijah za standardizacijo, pod pogojem, da so pridružene članice ali sodelujoče partnerice.
This could include providing those organisations with an effective membership in the ESOs on condition they are associate members or cooperating partners.
V tem okviru je pomemben element tudi uvedba alternativnega sistema, s katerim bi zagotovili bolj uravnoteženo zastopanje vseh interesnih skupin v standardizacijskem postopku.
In this context, a vital element is also the introduction of an alternative system which would guarantee a more balanced representation of all stakeholders in the standardisation process.
Poročevalec pozdravlja nedavni razvoj dogodkov v Mednarodni organizaciji za standardizacijo, zlasti model, uporabljen za razvoj standarda ISO 26000 za družbeno odgovornost, v katerem so nacionalni organi za standarde v delovno skupino lahko imenovali samo po enega predstavnika iz vsake od šestih opredeljenih kategorij interesnih skupin.
The Rapporteur welcomes recent developments in the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), in particular the model used to develop the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility, in which national standards bodies were entitled to nominate to the respective working group only one representative from each of six stakeholder categories that were identified.
Podobne postopke z udeležbo več interesnih skupin, pri katerih gre za vnaprej določeno število sedežev za različne organizacije interesnih skupin, bi lahko uporabili kot drugo možnost pri oblikovanju evropskih standardov na področjih izrednega javnega interesa.
Similar multi-stakeholder procedures, establishing a predetermined number of seats for the various stakeholder organisations, could be used as an alternative for the drafting of European standards in areas of exceptional public interest.
Lažji dostop do standardov
Facilitating access to standards
Čeprav so mala in srednja podjetja glavni steber evropskega gospodarstva, njihova udeležba v standardizaciji ni vedno sorazmerna z njihovim gospodarskim pomenom.
Although small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) form the backbone of the European economy, their involvement in standardisation is not always commensurate with their economic importance.
Poleg tega standardi niso vedno zasnovani in sprejeti tako, da se upoštevajo značilnosti in okolje malih in srednjih podjetij, zlasti malih, mikro in obrtnih podjetij.
Moreover, standards are not always designed and adapted to take account of the characteristics and environment of SMEs, in particular small, micro and craft enterprises.
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da so standardi razumljivi in enostavni za uporabo, tako da jih lahko uporabniki bolje izvajajo.
It is necessary, therefore, to ensure that standards are comprehensible and easy to use so that they can be better implemented by all users.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba sprejeti ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da lahko mala in srednja podjetja v celoti sodelujejo pri razvijanju standardov in imajo lažji, pa tudi cenejši dostop do njih.
Measures should be also taken to ensure that SMEs are able to fully take part in the development of standards and have easier, and less costly, access to them.
Standardizacija na področju storitev
Standardisation in the areas of services
Standardi so prispevali k znatnemu izboljšanju kakovosti in varnosti blaga, vendar na področju storitev še zdaleč niso tako številčni, da bi dosegli gospodarski pomen in potencial tega sektorja.
Standards have contributed to a considerable improvement in the quality and safety of goods, but their availability in the area of services lags considerably behind the economic importance and potential of this sector.
Čeprav standardi za storitve pogosto ustrezajo posebnim nacionalnim značilnostim in je njihov razvoj povezan s potrebami trga, bo razvoj evropskih standardov za storitve, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2006/123/ES o storitvah na notranjem trgu, pripomogel k nadaljnji uskladitvi v storitvenem sektorju, povečal preglednost, kakovost in konkurenčnost evropskih storitev ter spodbudil konkurenco, inovacije, odpravo trgovinskih ovir in varstvo potrošnikov.
Although service standards often respond to national specificities and their development is related to the needs of the market, the development of European service standards, as provided for in Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market, will benefit further harmonisation in the services sector, increase the transparency, quality and competitiveness of European services and promote competition, innovation, the reduction of trade barriers and the protection of the consumer.
Standardizacija v podporo inovacijam
Standardisation in support of innovation
Čeprav standardizacija veliko pripomore k izkoriščanju novih tehnologij, obstaja bistven razkorak pri prenašanju rezultatov raziskav in razvoja v razvijanje standardov.
Although standardisation can be a major facilitator for the exploitation of new technologies, there is a significant gap in the transfer of R&D results into the development of standards.
Zato je treba izboljšati vzajemno zavedanje in sodelovanje med standardizacijskimi organi, inovatorji, akademiki in raziskovalnimi skupnostmi.
It is necessary, therefore, to improve mutual awareness and cooperation between standardisers, innovators, academia and the research communities.
Z vključitvijo novega znanja v standarde, zlasti iz raziskovalnih in inovacijskih programov, financiranih z javnimi sredstvi, bi spodbudili inovacije in konkurenčnost.
The inclusion of new knowledge in standards, in particular from publicly-funded research and innovation programmes, will promote innovation and competitiveness.
Poleg tega bi morala Evropa imeti dejavnejšo vlogo pri spodbujanju vseevropskih medsebojno povezljivih standardov za inovativne proizvode in tehnologije, npr. na področju nizkoogljičnih virov ter informacijsko-komunikacijskih storitev in tehnologije.
Europe should also play a more active role in the promotion of EU-wide interoperable standards for innovative products and technologies, such as in the area of low carbon and ICT services and technologies.
Standardizacija v globaliziranem svetu
Standardisation in a globalised world
Evropski standardizacijski sistem priznava prednostni položaj mednarodnih standardov.
The European standardisation system recognises the primacy of international standards.
Toda evropski standardi so potrebni, kadar mednarodnih ni ali kadar ne ustrezajo za izpolnjevanje evropskih potreb, zlasti tistih, ki so opredeljene v evropskih politikah in zakonodaji.
European standards are, however, necessary where international standards do not exist or where they do not adequately serve European needs, in particular those needs determined by European policies and legislation.
Evropa bi morala okrepiti svoj položaj v mednarodnem standardizacijskem okolju, da bi spodbudila razvoj standardov s pravim globalnim pomenom, olajšala trgovino in povečala evropsko konkurenčnost.
Europe should strengthen its position within the international standardisation environment in order to promote the development of standards with genuine global relevance, facilitate trade and increase European competitiveness.
Poleg tega bi lahko Evropa spodbujala metodologijo novega pristopa ali enakovredne, za standarde dovzetne regulativne modele v svojem regulativnem, s trgovino povezanim sodelovanjem s trgovinskimi partnericami EU.
Moreover, Europe could promote the methodology of the ‘New Approach’, or equivalent standards-receptive regulatory models, in its regulatory trade-related cooperation with EU trading partners.