natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če zadevna država članica ne zaprosi za razpravo v Svetu v roku iz odstavka 2, Komisija utemeljeno odločitev o prošnji države članice predloži v 130 dneh po prejemu uradnega obvestila iz člena 7(1).
If the Member State concerned does not request a debate within the Council within the time limit referred to in paragraph 2 the Commission shall give a reasoned decision on the application of the Member State within 130 days of receipt of the notification referred to in Article 7(1).
Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu uradno obvestilo o svoji odločitvi v 30 dneh po njenem sprejetju.
The Commission shall notify its decision to the European Parliament and to the Council within 30 days of the decision.
Komisiji pomaga odbor, ustanovljen v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. [...] o uvedbi postopka za pogajanja o dvostranskih sporazumih med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, ki so povezani s sektorskimi zadevami in zajemajo pristojnosti, priznavanje in izvrševanje sodnih odločb in sklepov v zakonskih sporih, o starševski odgovornosti in preživninskih obveznostih ter pravo, ki se uporablja v zadevah v zvezi s preživninskimi obveznostmi, ter za njihovo sklenitev.
The Commission shall be assisted by a committee, established under Council Regulation (EC) No [...] establishing a procedure for negotiation and conclusion of bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries concerning sectoral matters and covering jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments and decisions in matrimonial matters, parental responsibility and maintenance obligations, and applicable law in matters relating to maintenance obligations.
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporablja svetovalni postopek, določen v členu 3 Sklepa 1999/468/ES, v skladu s členoma 7 in 8 Sklepa.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, the advisory procedure laid down in Article 3 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, in compliance with Article 7 and Article 8 thereof.
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporablja upravljalni postopek, določen v členu 4 Sklepa 1999/468/ES, v skladu s členoma 7 in 8 Sklepa.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, the management procedure laid down in Article 4 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, in compliance with Article 7 and Article 8 thereof.
Pri uradnem obveščanju Komisije o pogajanjih in njihovem izidu, kot je predvideno v členih 3, 4(3) in 7, države članice Komisijo jasno opozorijo, ali je treba katero koli posredovano informacijo obravnavati kot zaupno in ali jo je mogoče posredovati drugim državam članicam.
In notifying the Commission of negotiations and their outcome as envisaged in Articles 3, 4(3) and 7, Member States shall clearly inform the Commission whether any information therein is to be considered confidential and whether it may be shared with other Member States.
Komisija in države članice zagotovijo, da so vse informacije, opredeljene kot zaupne, obravnavane v skladu s členom 4(1)(a) Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije 1 .
The Commission and Member States shall ensure that any information identified as confidential is treated in accordance with Article 4(1) (a) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents 1 .
Obveščanje držav članic
I nformation to the Member States
Ob spoštovanju zahtev glede zaupnosti Komisija pošlje državam članicam in pristojnemu odboru Evropskega parlamenta uradna obvestila, ki jih prejme v skladu s členoma 3 in 7, po potrebi pa tudi spremljajoče dokumente ter vse svoje utemeljene odločitve v skladu s členi 5, 5a, 7 in 7a.
The Commission shall send to the Member States and the competent committee of the European Parliament the notifications received under Articles 3 and 7 and, if necessary, the accompanying documents, as well as all its reasoned decisions under Articles 5, 5a, 7 and 7a, subject to the requirements of confidentiality.
Komisija najpozneje do 1. januarja 2014 Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru predstavi poročilo o uporabi te uredbe , ki mu lahko priloži ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
No later than the 1st January 2014 the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on application of this Regulation , which may be accompanied by an appropriate legislative proposal.
Komisija najpozneje do 1. januarja 2014 Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru predstavi poročilo o uporabi te uredbe .
No later than 1 January 2014 the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Regulation .
Poročilo vsebuje pozitivno priporočilo bodisi o razveljavitvi te uredbe bodisi o ohranitvi njene veljavnosti do datuma izteka veljavnosti, ki je določen v členu 10a.
The report shall contain a positive recommendation either to abrogate this Regulation or to maintain it in force until the expiry date prescribed in Article 10a.
Če se ohrani veljavnost te uredbe, Komisija najpozneje do 1. januarja 2019 predstavi nadaljnje tovrstno poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru.
If th e Regulation is maintained in force, the Commission shall present a further such report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee no later than 1 January 2019.
Poročilu se lahko priloži ustrezen zakonodajni predlog , zlasti za nadomestitev te uredbe z uredbo, ki ima enako področje uporabe, ali z uredbo, katere področje uporabe je razširjeno na priznavanje in izvrševanje sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah v skladu z uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 1 .
The reports may be accompanied by an appropriate legislative proposal , in particular for the replacement of th e Regulation by a regulation with the same scope or by a regulation with its scope extended to recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters under Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 1 .
Komisija podaljša pregled uredbe št. 44/2001, da bo lahko omenjeno vprašanje celostno obravnavala.
The Commission’s review of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 shall be extended to take this question fully into account.
1 UL L 12, 16.01.2001, str.
1 OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
Ta uredba preneha veljati 31. decembra 2019.
This Regulation shall expire on 31 December 2019.
Če se državi članici dovoli začetek pogajanj v skladu s členom 5 pred iztekom veljavnosti ali razveljavitvijo te uredbe, se dovoli nadaljevanje in dokončanje teh pogajanj v skladu z določbami te uredbe, ne glede na prenehanje veljavnosti te uredbe na ta datum ali njeno razveljavitev v skladu s členom 10.
Notwithstanding the expiry of this Regulation on that date or its abrogation pursuant to Article 10, where authorisation to open negotiations is granted to a Member State pursuant to Article 5 before that expiry or abrogation date , those negotiations shall be allowed to continue and to be completed in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.
Poleg pravnega reda Skupnosti so za področje civilnega pravosodja značilni številni dvostranski sporazumi, ki so jih države članice sklenile s tretjimi državami pred začetkom veljavnosti zadevnih določb Amsterdamske pogodbe ali pred pristopom k Evropski skupnosti.
Apart from the acquis communautaire , the field of civil justice is also characterised by a number of bilateral agreements concluded by Member States with third countries prior to the entry into force of the relevant provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty or prior to their accession to the Community.
Če ti že obstoječi sporazumi vsebujejo določbe, ki niso v skladu s Pogodbo ES, morajo države članice v skladu s členom 307 Pogodbe o ES storiti vse, da neskladnosti odpravijo.
To the extent that such pre-existing agreements contain provisions that are not compatible with the EC Treaty, Member States need to take all steps to eliminate the incompatibilities, pursuant to Article 307 of the EC Treaty.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je potrdilo, da lahko, če je to potrebno, države članice odpovejo sporazume, ki niso v skladu s pravnim redom Skupnosti.
The European Court of Justice has confirmed that, if necessary, Member States are required to denounce agreements that are incompatible with the acquis .
Poleg že obstoječih dvostranskih sporazumov bo morda treba skleniti nove sporazume s tretjimi državami, ki urejajo področja civilnega pravosodja in spadajo pod naslov IV pogodbe o ES.
Apart from pre-existing bilateral agreements, there may also be a need for the conclusion of new agreements with third countries governing areas of civil justice that come within Title IV of the EC Treaty.
Sodišče je v mnenju 1/03 z dne 7. februarja 2006 o sklenitvi nove luganske konvencije
In Opinion 1/03 of 7 February 2006 relating to the conclusion of the new Lugano Convention
[2006] ECR I-1145. potrdilo, da je Skupnost pridobila izključno pristojnost za sklenitev mednarodnih sporazumov s tretjimi državami o zadevah, ki vplivajo na pravila, določena med drugim v uredbi (ES) št. 44/2001 („Bruselj I“), zlasti o pristojnosti ter priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah.
[2006] ECR I-1145. , the Court of Justice held that the Community has acquired exclusive competence to conclude international agreements with third countries, on matters affecting the rules set out inter ali a in Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 ("Brussels I"), in particular on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je analiza določb nove luganske konvencije o pravilih glede pristojnosti pokazala, da določbe vplivajo na enotno in povezano uporabo pravil Skupnosti v zvezi s pristojnostjo sodišč in na dobro delovanje sistema, ki ga pravila uvajajo.
In its opinion the Court found that analysis of the provisions of the new Lugano Convention relating to the rules on jurisdiction showed that those provisions affected the uniform and consistent application of the Community rules on jurisdiction and the proper functioning of the system established by those rules.
Do podobne ugotovitve je Sodišče prišlo v zvezi s pravili, ki jih je konvencija predlagala glede priznanja in izvršitve sodnih odločb.
With regard to the proposed Convention's rules on recognition and enforcement of judgments the Court came to a similar conclusion.
Ugotovilo je, da pravila Skupnosti o priznanju in izvršitvi sodnih odločb niso ločljiva od pravil o pristojnosti sodišč, s katerimi tvorijo splošen in povezan sistem, ter da bi nova luganska konvencija vplivala na enotno in povezano uporabo pravil Skupnosti o pristojnosti sodišč in o priznanju in izvršitvi sodnih odločb, kot tudi na dobro delovanje splošnega sistema, ki ga pravila uvajajo.
It found that the Community rules on the recognition and enforcement of judgments were indissociable from those on the jurisdiction of courts, with which they formed a unified and coherent system, and that the new Lugano Convention would affect the uniform and consistent application of the Community rules as regards both the jurisdiction of courts and the recognition and enforcement of judgments and the proper functioning of the unified system established by those rules.
Zato Komisija meni, da je treba sklepati, da je Skupnost pridobila izključno pristojnost za pogajanje o številnih zgoraj navedenih dvostranskih sporazumih ter za njihovo sklenitev.
Consequently, the Commission considers that it must be assumed that the Community has acquired exclusive competence for the negotiation and conclusion of many of the bilateral agreements referred to above.
Ob tem je treba vseeno opozoriti, da vsi ne soglašajo z mnenjem Sodišča 1/03
It must be noted, however, that not all commentators agree with the view taken by the Court in Opinion 1/03
Glej na primer razlago, ki jo je podal Ulrich G.
See, for instance, the annotation by Ulrich G. Schroeter (Freiburg) in
Prav tako je težko razumeti, kako gre lahko izključna pristojnost Skupnosti skupaj z možnostjo odstopanja, ki jo ima Danska. .
It is also hard to see how exclusive Community competence can be squared with the Danish opt-out. .
Nadalje je zanimivo opozoriti na določbe členov 3
Moreover, it is interesting to note the provisions of Articles 3
Unija ima izključno pristojnost na naslednjih področjih:
The Union shall have exclusive competence in the following areas:
(a) carinska unija,
(a) customs union;
(b) določitev pravil o konkurenci, potrebnih za delovanje notranjega trga,
(b) the establishing of the competition rules necessary for the functioning of the internal market;
(c) monetarna politika držav članic, katerih valuta je euro,
(c) monetary policy for the Member States whose currency is the euro;
(d) ohranjanje morskih bioloških virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike,
(d) the conservation of marine biological resources under the common fisheries policy;
(e) skupna trgovinska politika.
(e) common commercial policy.
Unija ima tudi izključno pristojnost za sklenitev mednarodnega sporazuma, kadar je ta sklenitev predvidena v zakonodajnem aktu Unije ali je potrebna, da se Uniji omogoči izvajanje njene notranje pristojnosti, ali kolikor lahko vpliva na skupna pravila ali spremeni njihovo področje uporabe . (poudarki so dodani) in 4
The Union shall also have exclusive competence for the conclusion of an international agreement when its conclusion is provided for in a legislative act of the Union or is necessary to enable the Union to exercise its internal competence, or in so far as its conclusion may affect common rules or alter their scope . (emphasis supplied) and 4
Unija si deli pristojnost z državami članicami, če ji Pogodbi dodeljujeta pristojnost, ki se ne nanaša na področja iz členov 3 in 6.
The Union shall share competence with the Member States where the Treaties confer on it a competence which does not relate to the areas referred to in Articles 3 and 6.
Deljena pristojnost med Unijo in državami članicami se nanaša na naslednja glavna področja:
Shared competence between the Union and the Member States applies in the following principal areas:
(a) notranji trg,
(a) internal market;
(b) socialno politiko glede vidikov, opredeljenih v tej pogodbi,
(b) social policy, for the aspects defined in this Treaty;
(c) ekonomsko, socialno in teritorialno kohezijo,
(c) economic, social and territorial cohesion;
(d) kmetijstvo in ribištvo, razen ohranjanja morskih bioloških virov,
(d) agriculture and fisheries, excluding the conservation of marine biological resources;
(f) varstvo potrošnikov,
(f) consumer protection;
(h) vseevropska omrežja,
(h) trans-European networks;
(j) območje svobode, varnosti in pravice,
(j) area of freedom, security and justice ;
(k) skupno skrb za varnost na področju javnega zdravja glede vidikov, opredeljenih v tej pogodbi.
(k) common safety concerns in public health matters, for the aspects defined in this Treaty.
Na področjih raziskav, tehnološkega razvoja in vesolja ima Unija pristojnost ukrepanja, zlasti za opredelitev in izvajanje programov, ne da bi izvajanje te pristojnosti oviralo države članice pri izvajanju njihovih pristojnosti.
In the areas of research, technological development and space, the Union shall have competence to carry out activities, in particular to define and implement programmes; however, the exercise of that competence shall not result in Member States being prevented from exercising theirs.
Na področjih razvojnega sodelovanja in humanitarne pomoči ima Unija pristojnost ukrepanja in vodenja skupne politike, ne da bi izvajanje te pristojnosti oviralo države članice pri izvajanju njihovih pristojnosti. (poudarki so dodani) pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
In the areas of development cooperation and humanitarian aid, the Union shall have competence to carry out activities and conduct a common policy; however, the exercise of that competence shall not result in Member States being prevented from exercising theirs. (emphasis supplied) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union.
Komisija meni, da je treba oceniti, ali trenutno obstaja dovolj velik interes Skupnosti, da bi vse tovrstne obstoječe ali predlagane sporazume med državami članicami in tretjimi državami nadomestili s sporazumi Skupnosti.
The Commission takes the view that it is necessary to assess whether there exists a sufficient Community interest for the Community to replace all such existing or proposed agreements between Member States and third countries with Community agreements.
Zato je treba določiti tudi postopek z dvojnim ciljem.
For that reason it is necessary to establish a procedure with a twofold purpose.
Prvi je, da se Skupnosti omogoči oceno, ali obstaja dovolj velik interes Skupnosti za sklenitev nekega sporazuma.
The first is to allow the Community to assess whether there is such a sufficient Community interest in the conclusion of a particular agreement.
Drugi cilj je dovoliti državam članicam, da sklenejo zadevni sporazum, če Skupnost trenutno nima interesa za sklenitev sporazuma Skupnosti.
The second is to authorise Member States to conclude the agreement at issue if there is no current Community interest in the conclusion of a Community agreement.
Poročevalec podpira predlagano uredbo, saj bi lahko delovala kot sredstvo za ublažitev neprožnosti, ki bi ji bile podvržene države članice zaradi doktrine o prednostni pravici na področju zunanjih pristojnosti.
The rapporteur is supportive of the proposed regulation as a potential means of mitigating the inflexibility imposed on Member States by the doctrine of pre-emption in the field of the external competence.
Ta doktrina namreč državam članicam onemogoča sklenitev koristnih dvostranskih in medregionalnih sporazumov z državami nečlanicami, ki sodijo v zunanjo pristojnost.
This doctrine prevents Member States from entering into useful bilateral and intra-regional agreements with non-member countries falling within that competence.
Za odpravo kočljivega položaja ni predvidene druge rešitve, saj Komisija nima na voljo potrebnega osebja in časa, da bi se pogajala o sporazumih Skupnosti, v veliki večini primerov pa dvostranski sporazumi tudi ne zadevajo interesa Skupnosti.
No other solution to this quandary can be envisaged, since the Commission does not have the staff or the time to negotiate Community agreements and moreover in the great majority of cases no Community interest exists in the type of bilateral agreements in question.
Vendar pa je predlog Komisije omejen v svojem obsegu, zato je poročevalec predlagal, da bi klavzula o ponovnem pregledu zajemala tudi možnost prihodnje razširitve pravne pristojnosti ter priznavanja in izvrševanja sodnih določb.
However, what the Commission has proposed is limited in scope and, for this reason, your rapporteur has proposed that the review clause also cover a possible future extension to jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments.
Srečno naključje, da Komisija ravno opravlja pregled uredbe št. 44/2001(ES) („Bruselj 1”), je lahko pri tem v veliko pomoč.
The fortunate fact that the Commission is undertaking a review of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (“Brussels I”) may be of considerable assistance in this regard.
Prav tako je odpravil diskrecijsko pravico Komisije pri izdajanju dovoljenj za sklenitev sporazumov.
He has also removed the Commission’s discretion with regard to authorising the conclusion of an agreement.
Po predlogu Komisije bi namreč ta lahko sklenila, da ne izda dovoljenja za sklenitev dvostranskega sporazuma, čeprav so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za začetno dovoljenje.
As the proposal stood, the Commission could refuse authorisation to conclude a bilateral agreement even if it fulfilled all the conditions required for initial authorisation.
To bi lahko pripeljalo do resnih diplomatskih trenj s tretjimi državami.
This could have caused major diplomatic problems with the third country concerned.
Poročevalec ob koncu še izpostavlja, da so njegovi predlogi sprememb odraženi tudi v osnutku mnenja k vzporednemu predlogu uredbe o uvedbi postopka za pogajanja o dvostranskih sporazumih, ki zajemajo pristojnosti, priznavanje in izvrševanje sodnih odločb in sklepov v zakonskih sporih, o starševski odgovornosti in preživninskih obveznostih ter pravo, ki se uporablja v zadevah v zvezi s preživninskimi obveznostmi, ter za njihovo sklenitev.
Lastly, the rapporteur would note that his amendments are mirrored in his draft opinion on the parallel proposal for a regulation establishing a procedure for negotiation and conclusion of bilateral agreements covering jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments and decisions in matrimonial matters, parental responsibility and maintenance obligations, and applicable law in matters relating to maintenance obligations.
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi postopka za pogajanja o dvostranskih sporazumih med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, ki so povezani s sektorskimi zadevami in zajemajo pravo, ki se uporablja za pogodbena in nepogodbena obligacijska razmerja, ter za njihovo sklenitev
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a procedure for the negotiation and conclusion of bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries concerning sectoral matters and covering applicable law in contractual and non-contractual obligations
V skladu s členom 307 Pogodbe morajo države članice odpraviti vse neskladnosti med pravnim redom Skupnosti in mednarodnimi sporazumi, sklenjenimi med državami članicami in tretjimi državami.
According to Article 307 of the Treaty, Member States are required to eliminate any incompatibility between the Community acquis and the international agreement concluded by that Member State and the third country.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je v svojem Mnenju 1/03 z dne 7. februarja 2006 (Lugano) potrdilo, da je Skupnost pridobila izključno zunanjo pristojnost za pogajanja o mednarodnih sporazumih s tretjimi državami in njihovi sklenitvi v zvezi s številnimi pomembnimi vprašanji iz naslova IV Pogodbe.
The European Court of Justice confirmed in its Opinion 1/03 of 7 February 2006 (Lugano) that the Community has acquired exclusive external competences to negotiate and conclude international agreements with third countries on a number of important matters as referred to in Title IV of the Treaty.
To pristojnost ji nalaga Pogodba in torej ne zadeva vprašanja izvedbenih pooblastil (člen 202 Pogodbe).
This competence is conferred upon it by the Treaty and does therefore not concern a case of implementing powers (as foreseen in article 202 of the Treaty).
Drugi cilj je dovoliti državam članicam, da sklenejo zadevni sporazum , če Skupnost trenutno nima interesa za sklenitev takega sporazuma .
The second is to authorise Member States to conclude the agreement at issue if there is no current Community interest in the conclusion of such an agreement .
Komisija mora oceniti, ali obstaja interes Skupnosti za sklenitev sporazuma med Skupnostjo in določeno tretjo državo .
The Commission should assess whether there is a Community interest in the conclusion of an agreement between the Community and a third country.
(9a) Takšna merila in pogoji bi morali zagotavljati ravnotežje med interesom Skupnosti na eni strani in posebnim interesom zadevne države članice na drugi strani ter ne bi smeli onesposobiti prava Skupnosti ali ogroziti pravilnega delovanja sistema, vzpostavljenega na podlagi njegovih pravil.
(9a) Such criteria and conditions should ensure a balance between, on the one hand, the Community interest, and on the other hand the specific interest of the Member State concerned and should not render Community law ineffective or undermine the proper functioning of the system established by its rules.