natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Odbor mora v zvezi z nalogami upoštevati nekatere postopkovne omejitve :
With respect to the duties, the committee has to respect certain procedural limitations :
Odstavek 2 člena 2 določa, da so zaslišanja in pričanja praviloma javna, vendar imajo priče in izvedenci pravico dajati izjave ali pričati brez navzočnosti javnosti.
Article 2, paragraph 2 provides that Hearings and testimony shall take place in public as a general rule but witnesses and experts shall have the right to make statements or provide testimony in camera.
Seje (sestanki) potekajo brez navzočnosti javnosti, če tako zahteva četrtina članov, nacionalni organi, institucije Skupnosti ali kadar se obravnavajo tajne informacije.
Proceedings (meetings) shall take place in camera if requested by one quarter of the Members, or if requested by national authorities, EC institutions or when dealing with secret documents.
Odstavek 8 člena 176 poslovnika določa, da predsednik poskrbi za spoštovanje tajnosti razprav, odstavek 9 člena 176 poslovnika pa vsebuje navodila za pregledovanje posredovanih tajnih ali zaupnih dokumentov.
Rule 176 paragraph 8 states that the Chairman shall ensure that the confidentiality of deliberations is respected and Rule 176 paragraph 9 provides guidance for the examination of secret or confidential documents forwarded.
Uporablja se del A Priloge VII k poslovniku o obravnavi zaupnih dokumentov, predloženih Parlamentu.
Part A of Annex VII to the Rules of Procedure on the consideration of confidential documents communicated to Parliament would be applicable.
Odstavek 1 člena 4 določa, da se informacije, ki jih začasni preiskovalni odbor pridobi, uporabijo izključno za opravljanje njegovih nalog.
Article 4, paragraph 1 states that the information gathered by the committee shall be used solely for the performance of its duties.
Informacije se ne smejo objaviti, če vsebujejo gradivo tajne ali zaupne narave.
It will not be made public if it contains material of a secret or confidential nature.
Člani odbora so v zvezi s tajnimi informacijami zavezani k molčečnosti; enako velja za osebje Evropske unije in drugo osebje EP ali poslancev.
A duty of confidentiality on Members of the committee in respect of privileged information is established; the same applies for European Union staff and other EP or Members' staff.
Jasno je, da za uslužbence EU veljajo disciplinski ukrepi, če kršijo svojo zavezo k molčečnosti iz tega člena ali Sklepa 95/167.
It is clear that EU officials are subject to disciplinary measures if they break their confidentiality duties as laid down in this Article or in Decision 95/167.
Enako velja za državne uradnike.
The same applies to national officials.
Fizične osebe ali člani odgovarjajo le v smislu nacionalnih sodišč ali parlamentarnih disciplinskih ukrepov za člane (Priloga VII k poslovniku).
For private persons or Members, responsibilities arise only in the context of the relevant national Courts or parliamentary disciplinary measures for Members (Annex VII to the Rules)
Odstavek 7 člena 176 poslovnika določa, da lahko vsakdo, ki nastopi kot priča pred odborom, uveljavlja pravice, ki bi jih imel kot priča pred sodiščem v svoji matični državi in da mora biti o teh pravicah poučen, preden poda odboru izjavo.
Rule 176 paragraph 7 establishes that a person called to give evidence before a committee can claim the same rights they would enjoy if acting as a witness before a tribunal in their country of origin, and they must be informed of these rights before they make a statement to the committee.
Načeloma s tem ne dobijo pravice, da jih spremlja odvetnik, ker priče praviloma nimajo te pravice, razen če se bojijo, da bodo med postopkom obtožene.
In principle, this should not entitle them to be accompanied by a lawyer, because witnesses do not as a rule enjoy this right, except if they fear accusation during the course of a procedure.
Odbor EP za pravne zadeve običajno dovoli, da člane spremljajo odvetniki, vendar ti ne smejo dobiti besede.
The practice at the Legal Affairs Committee of the EP has been to allow Members to come with their lawyers but without allowing the lawyer to take the floor.
To prakso je izbral Odbor.
This has been the practice chosen by the committee.
Končna naloga odbora po zaključku nalog je, da predloži Parlamentu poročilo o rezultatih dela, ki po potrebi vsebuje manjšinska mnenja.
The final duty of the committee, after completion of its tasks, is to submit to Parliament a report on the result of its work, containing if need be minority opinions.
Poročilo se objavi (odstavek 10 člena 176 poslovnika).
The report is published (Rule 176 paragraph .10).
Na podlagi člena 193 Pogodbe o ES in Odločbe 95/167 je Evropski parlament pridobil več nadzornih pooblastil.
Article 193 TCE was definitely a step forward for the European Parliament's supervisory powers, as was Decision 95/167.
Pred sprejetjem teh dokumentov pristojnosti parlamentov večine držav članic za preiskave niso bile tako velike in natančno določene, kot so zdaj.
At that time the powers of inquiry at the Parliaments of most Members States were not as large and detailed as they are now.
Tudi pristojnosti, narava odgovornosti in pooblastila Evropskega parlamenta so bili drugačni od današnjih.
Likewise, the competences, nature of the responsibilities and powers of the European Parliament were not the same as the institution enjoys today.
Politična pomembnost Evropskega parlamenta se je okrepila, vendar so se povečala tudi pričakovanja številnih evropskih državljanov.
The European Parliament's political stature has grown and so have the expectations of many European citizens.
Kot je omenjeno zgoraj, so preiskovalni odbori pomemben del nadzornih pooblastil Parlamenta in jih je zato treba okrepiti.
As said above, the committees of inquiry are an important part of Parliament's supervisory powers and therefore should be reinforced.
Od leta 1995 so bili ustanovljeni samo trije preiskovalni odbori.
Since 1995 only three committees of inquiry have been set up.
Očitno je uporaba te pristojnosti zelo majhna.
It does seem a very moderate use of the prerogative.
Čeprav izvajajo stalni odbori svoje nadzorne pristojnosti zelo zadovoljivo, se na posamezno posebno nalogo osredotočijo preiskovalni odbori, ki jih sestavljajo člani različnih odborov z različnimi izkušnjami in znanjem.
Even if the standing committees accomplish their supervisory responsibilities very satisfactorily, the committees of inquiry are committees focused on one specific task, with Members from different committees bringing different experiences and knowledge.
Smiselno se zdi preučiti možnost nadaljnje uporabe tega pomembnega orodja z izboljšanjem in posodabljanjem njegovih pooblastil, ne da bi ob tem spodbujali zlorabo tega nadzornega mehanizma.
Without pretending to encourage the abuse of this mechanism of control, it seems useful to look into the possibility of exploiting further this important tool by improving and updating its authority.
Preiskovalni odbor ovirajo pri preiskavah številne omejitve, kar se lahko hitro ugotovi iz obstoječih pooblastil, razloženih zgoraj.
This committee of inquiry has been limited in its investigation by a number of restrictions which can be easily inferred from the existing powers as detailed above.
Razen kar zadeva Evropsko komisijo, ima odbor zelo malo pristojnosti: ne more pozvati prič, zavrnitev njihovega sodelovanja v preiskavi nima nobenih posledic, stroškov ali kazni, prav tako pa ni nobenih sankcij za krivo pričanje, zavrnitev udeležbe ali pričanja pred odborom.
Except with regard to the European Commission, the committee has very little power: it cannot summon witnesses, there are no consequences, cost or penalty if a possible witness refuses to cooperate with the inquiry, and there are no sanctions for giving false testimony or for refusing to attend or to give evidence before the committee.
21) Odbor nima v zvezi z nacionalnimi upravami, ali kadar upravni ali zasebni organ odboru ne želi predložiti dokumentacije, nobenih preiskovalnih pooblastil, ki bi bila podobna pooblastilom sodišč.
21) The committee has no investigative powers similar to the Courts in connection with national administrations or when an administrative or private body refuses to deliver documentation to the committee.
Prav tako ne more nacionalnega sodišča zaprositi za pomoč pri preiskavi.
Neither does it have the possibility to ask a national Court for assistance in the course of its investigation.
Ta položaj je spodbudil odbor, da oceni stanje, zato je od Oddelka za politiko zahteval informacije o trenutnem stanju v več nacionalnih parlamentih
This situation has prompted the committee to evaluate the situation, leading it to request from the Policy department information on what is at the present time the situation in a number of National Parliaments
Informacije so zagotovili informatorji Evropskega centra za parlamentarne raziskave in dokumentacijo (ECPRD). .
The information was provided by the correspondents of the European Centre for Parliamentary Research and Documentation (ECPRD). .
Temu delu je priložena priloga s pregledom več vprašanj, ki zadevajo preiskovalni odbor in katerih namen je predložiti več predlogov Parlamentu.
Attached to this Part there is an Annex with an overview on several questions of interest for this committee of inquiry with a view to putting forward a number of suggestions to Parliament.
Splošna ugotovitev je, da so nacionalni parlamenti veliko bolj pripravljeni, kot so bili pred 10 leti, in veliko bolje opremljeni za opravljanje preiskav kot Evropski parlament.
The overall finding is that National Parliaments are much better prepared than 10 years ago and that they are much better equipped for undertaking inquiries than the EP.
Da bi se zbrale primerjalne informacije v zvezi z ustanavljanjem preiskovalnih odborov nacionalnih parlamentov držav članic in njegovih delovnih postopkov, so bili ocenjeni podatki, zbrani v 15 državah članicah in Švici leta 2003.
In order to gather comparative information concerning the setting up and working procedures of the committees of inquiry of national parliaments of the Member States, data collected from 15 Member States and Switzerland in 2003 was evaluated.
Večina držav članic (razen spodnjega doma Združenega kraljestva)ima v zvezi z ustanavljanjem preiskovalnih odborov nacionalnih parlamentov in njihovih delovnih postopkov ustavni sistem, ki skrbi za parlamentarne preiskovalne odbore.
With respect to the setting up of committees of inquiry in national Parliaments and their working procedures, the majority of Member States (except for the House of Commons of the United Kingdom) have a constitutional system that provides for Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry (PCIs).
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da imajo nekateri ožji britanski odbori (v zgornjem in spodnjem domu) na voljo postopke, podobne tistim iz parlamentarnih preiskovalnih odborom v drugih državah, vendar imajo pooblastila za nedoločen čas in stalen seznam dolžnosti (npr. pregled zakonodaje EU).
It should be noted, however, that some of the British Select Committees (both in the House of Commons and the House of Lords) have procedures similar to those of PCIs in other countries, but they have an open-ended mandate and a permanent catalogue of duties (e.g., scrutiny of EU legislation).
V teh državah obstaja pravni okvir za ustanovitev parlamentarnih preiskovalnih odborov.
In these countries there is a legal framework for the creation of PCIs.
Ta pravni okvir vključuje določbe v ustavi, poslovniku Parlamenta ali skupni zakonodaji.
This includes provisions either in the Constitution, the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament, or ordinary law.
V nekaterih državah vključujejo pravne podlage vse tri ravni, medtem ko so v drugih državah ustrezne določbe samo v enem od zgoraj omenjenih kategorij.
In some countries the legal bases encompass all three levels, whereas in others the relevant provisions can be found in just one or two of the categories mentioned above.
Glavni namen parlamentarnih preiskovalnih odborov v večini sistemov je nadzorovanje dejavnosti vlade ali uprave.
The main purpose of PCIs in most systems is supervising the actions of the government or the administration.
V nekaterih državah imajo parlamentarni odbori dodatno nalogo, da zagotavlja spoštovanje ustave ali drugih pravnih določb.
In some states PCIs have the additional duty to ensure respect of the Constitution or other legal provisions.
V večini držav članic imajo parlamentarni preiskovalni odbori preiskovalna pooblastila, podobna tistim, ki jih imajo sodišča, vendar v manjšem obsegu.
In most Member States PCIs have investigative powers similar to those of the courts but to a lesser extent.
V nekaterih primerih (Finska, Irska, Španija, Švedska, zgornji dom Združenega kraljestva) imajo parlamentarni preiskovalni odbori podobna pooblastila kot drugi parlamentarni odbori.
In some cases (Finland, Ireland, Spain, Sweden, UK House of Lords) PCIs have powers similar to those of other parliamentary committees.
Kadar parlamentarni preiskovalni odbori zaključijo svoj mandat, ima to ponavadi politične posledice, pri čemer se včasih izdajo tudi sodni akti in sprožijo postopki.
At the end of the mandate of PCIs there are usually political consequences and sometimes judicial acts or procedures as well.
Primerjalna študija kaže, da lahko ti odbori v vseh državah članicah, ki imajo pravno podlago za parlamentarne preiskovalne odbore (razen Finske), pozovejo priče , kot so vodje javnih organov ali drugi državljani, da predložijo dokaze.
The comparative study indicates that in all Member States which have a legal basis for PCIs (except Finland) there is the possibility for these committees to summon witnesses such as heads of public bodies or other citizens to give evidence.
V primeru neupoštevanja poziva za nastop pred parlamentarni preiskovalnim odborom obstajajo v različnih državah različne sankcije : v Grčiji lahko na primer predsednik parlamentarnega preiskovalnega odbora uveljavi obvezno prisotnost, na Irskem lahko zavrnitev nastopa pred parlamentarnim preiskovalnim odborom povzroči predložitev primera na višje sodišče, ki odredi nastop.
In case of non-compliance with an invitation to appear before a PCI there are different sanctions from country to country: in Greece, for example, the chair of a PCI may enforce the witness's compulsory attendance, whereas in Ireland a refusal to appear before the PCI may lead to presentation of a case to the High Court for an order to appear.
Zavrnitev teh zahtev lahko pomeni tudi kaznivo dejanje.
Refusal to comply may also constitute a criminal offence.
Na Nizozemskem se lahko za priče, ki nočejo nastopiti pred odborom ali ki namerno niso prisotne, odredi celo zaporna kazen.
In the Netherlands, witnesses who refuse to appear before the committee or who deliberately do not attend may even be imprisoned.
Ugotovitve iz primerjalne študije prav tako kažejo, da lahko parlamentarni preiskovalni odbor v večini državi članic, ki so bile pregledane v tej raziskavi, zahtevajo prenos informacij in dokumentacije, za katere meni, da so potrebne pri njegovih preiskavah, od nekega števila upravnih in političnih organov, kot so: vlada, sodni ali upravni organi.
The picture that can be gained from the comparative study also indicates that in most Member States examined in this survey PCIs can require the transmission of information and documentation deemed necessary for the conduct of their investigations from a certain number of administrative or political bodies such as: the government, the judicial authorities, or the administration authorities.
V nekaterih državah lahko parlamentarni preiskovalni odbori zahtevajo od zasebnih organov, da za njih zbirajo informacije.
In a few countries PCIs can also oblige private bodies to collect information for them.
Večina držav članic, ki so bile obravnavane v tej raziskavi, imajo pravila, ki parlamentarnim preiskovalnim odborom zagotavljajo načine za obravnavo takih organov, če ti ne želijo sodelovati.
In most Member States examined in this survey the rules provide PCIs with tools to deal with a refusal of such bodies to collaborate.
Obstaja veliko različnih možnosti, kako se odzvati na take težave, od upravnih glob (npr. v Avstriji) do zaporne kazni (npr. na Nizozemskem).
There is a wide range of possibilities to react to such problems, from administrative fines (e.g., in Austria) to the sanction of being imprisoned (e.g., in the Netherlands).
Prav tako podatki kažejo, da v več državah članicah (npr. v Avstriji, Belgiji, na Finskem, v Italiji, na Švedskem in tudi v Švici) parlamentarni preiskovalni odbori uživajo dodaten privilegij: sodišča lahko zaprosijo za dokumente, Sodišča pa njihove zahteve običajno izpolnijo.
The data also indicate that in several Member States (e.g., Austria, Belgium, Finland, Italy, Sweden, and also in Switzerland) PCIs enjoy a further privilege: they can ask the Courts for documents, and the Courts normally comply with these requests.
Na drugi strani v Franciji, na Irskem, v Grčiji in na Nizozemskem ni sodelovanja med parlamentarnimi preiskovalnimi odbori in sodišči, dvema organoma, ki delata neodvisno brez neposredne odvisnosti.
On the other hand, in France, Ireland, Greece and the Netherlands there is no cooperation between a PCI and the Courts, the two bodies working independently without any direct interaction.
V primerjavi s temi določbami pravila v zvezi z začasnimi preiskovalnimi odbori Evropskega parlamenta še vedno dopuščajo, da se pristojnosti teh organov dodatno okrepijo.
Compared to these provisions, the rules concerning temporary committees of inquiry of the European Parliament still leave some scope for developing further the responsibilities of these bodies.
Koristno bi bilo zlasti poostriti pravila, ki določajo sankcije za osebe ali institucije, ki ne želijo sodelovati.
In particular, making stricter the rules governing sanctions for persons or institutions refusing to cooperate would appear useful.
To bi bilo na primer mogoče doseči s tesnejšim sodelovanjem z nacionalnimi organi.
Closer cooperation with national authorities could be one way of achieving this.
Vendar lahko Evropski parlament prek nacionalnih institucij zaradi velike razlike med sankcijami iz različnih nacionalnih sistemov povzroči diskriminacijo državljanov EU.
However, the wide discrepancies between the sanctions provided for in different national systems could possibly create problems of discrimination in the European Parliament's treatment of EU citizens via national institutions.
V sklepu lahko izpostavimo naslednje ključne točke:
In conclusion we may draw the following key points:
V veliko primerih imajo parlamentarni preiskovalni odbori preiskovalna pooblastila, podobna pooblastilom sodišč, pri čemer je obseg njihovih pooblastil zadosten.
PCIs have in many cases investigative powers similar to the Courts but to a lesser extent, and the scope of their mandate is sufficient.
Parlamentarni preiskovalni odbori lahko na splošno zahtevajo informacije iz javnih – vključno s sodišči – in zasebnih organov, ti organi pa morajo sodelovati, pri čemer veljajo zanje sankcije, če tega ne storijo.
The PCIs are, in general, entitled to request information from public - including Courts- and private bodies and these bodies are obliged to cooperate subject to sanctions if they refuse to comply.
Priče so lahko po splošnem pravilom poklicane pred sodišče, pri čemer veljajo za njih upravne sankcije ali kazenski ukrepi, če ne želijo pričati.
Witnesses may, as a general rule, be summoned and are subject to administrative or even criminal penalties if they refuse to give evidence.
Sodelovanje s sodišči je v večini držav članic zagotovljeno na različne načine.
Collaboration with the Courts is ensured in most Member States and in many different ways.
Sklepi – DEL VI – PREISKOVALNI ODBORI
Conclusions - PART VI, COMMITTEES OF INQUIRY
Preiskovalni odbor na podlagi svojih pooblastil, ki mu dovoljujejo predložitev kakršnega koli predloga, ki se mu zdi potreben, sklepa naslednje:
The Committee of Inquiry, following its mandate which entitles it to put forward any proposal which it deems necessary, draws the following conclusions:
Odbor moti in obžaluje nespoštljivo vedenje številnih prič, ki niso sodelovale pri preiskavi.
The committee expresses irritation and regret at the discourteous conduct of several witnesses who did not cooperate with the Inquiry.
Odbor ugotavlja, da so pristojnosti preiskovalnega odbora, kot jih določata pravilnik in Sklep št. 95/167 Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, zelo omejene in niso v skladu s politično držo, potrebami in pristojnostmi Evropskega parlamenta.
The committee notes that the powers of the Committees of Inquiry, as set in the Rules of Procedure and in Decision 95/167 of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, are very limited and not in line with the political stature, needs and competences of the European Parliament.
DEL VII – PRIPOROČILA
PART VII - RECOMMENDATIONS
of thePreiskovalni odbor o krizi družbe "Equitable Life Assurance Society"
of the report of the Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society
KAZALO Priporočila
INDEX Recommendations
Del IV – Pravna sredstva
B. Part IV - Remedies
Odbor zahteva dodatno krepitev skrbnih in varnih nadzornih in regulativnih standardov v Uniji, vključno z obveznostjo, da se ustvarijo rezerve za obveznosti, kot so bonusi, vključno s končnimi bonusi in zajamčenimi dobički.
The committee demands the further strengthening of prudential supervisory and regulatory standards throughout the Union, including an obligation to reserve for liabilities such as bonuses, including terminal bonuses and guaranteed benefits.
Odbor zahteva, da zakonodaja o finančnih storitvah zagotovi sisteme za preventivno zgodnje opozarjanje, ki bodo lahko učinkovito opozarjali na možne težave, ki nastanejo pri nadzorovanju ali urejanju podjetij, ki izvajajo finančne storitve, zlasti pri čezmejnih finančnih poslih.
The committee requests financial services legislation to provide for preventive early-warning systems that are able efficiently to signal potential problems arising from the supervision or regulation of financial services companies, in particular when cross-border financial operations are involved.
Meni, da mora to zajemati predlog Komisije o projektu plačilne sposobnosti (Solvency II).
The committee believes that this should be encompassed by the Commission's proposal on Solvency II.
Odbor pozdravlja sedanje razprave v zvezi s projektom plačilne sposobnosti (Solvency II) ter uporabo načel in pristopa, ki temelji na tveganju, za izračun skrbnih in varnih zahtev, ki bodo zahtevale , da podjetja zadržujejo kapital v skladu s svojim profilom in ne izpolnjujejo zahteve, ki določa, da ena velikost ustreza vsem.
The committee welcomes current discussions surrounding Solvency II and the use of a principles and risk-based approach in calculating prudential requirements which will require companies to hold capital in line with their particular profile rather than meeting a one size fits all requirement.
Odbor močno priporoča nadaljnje izvajanje naprednejših mehanizmov, ki lahko jamčijo vzorno sodelovanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi, zlasti v okviru mreže Odbora evropskih nadzornikov za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine, da bi ustvarili resnično učinkovit intervencijski sistem, ki se lahko uspešno odzove na nepravilnosti ali motnje na notranjem trgu.
The committee strongly recommends the further implementation of more sophisticated mechanisms which are able to guarantee exemplary co-operation between national regulatory authorities, in particular within the framework of the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) network, in order to create a truly efficient intervention system able to successfully react to anomalies or disruptions within the internal market.
Odbor pozdravlja vključitev Odbora evropskih nadzornikov za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine v delovni program pregledov poslovnikov za leto 2007, ki ga bodo nadzorniki upoštevali pri čezmejnih dejavnostih, kot določa sienski protokol
The committee welcomes CEIOPS’s inclusion in its 2007 Work Programme of a review of rules of procedures to be followed by supervisors in cross-border activities, as set out in the Siena Protocol