natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Namenjen je združevanju prijave in dopustnosti v enem koraku.
It is intended to reduce registration and admissibility in one step.
Zato člen 8 ni potreben, saj se s prijavo in dopustnostjo ukvarja člen 4.
Therefore Article 8 is not necessary as Article 4 is dealing with registration and admissibility.
Na podlagi zbranega ustreznega števila izjav podpisnikov o podpori v skladu s členoma 5 in 7 in pod pogojem, da je Komisija v skladu s členom 8 odločila, da je predlagana državljanska pobuda dopustna, organizator izjave o podpori v papirni ali elektronski obliki predloži pristojnim organom iz člena 14 v preverjanje in potrditev.
After having collected the necessary statements of support from signatories in accordance with Articles 5 and 7, and provided that the Commission has decided that a proposed citizens' initiative is admissible in accordance with Article 8 , the organiser shall submit the statements of support, in paper or in electronic form, to the relevant competent authorities provided for in Article 14 for verification and certification.
Na podlagi zbranega ustreznega števila izjav podpisnikov o podpori v skladu s členoma 5 in 7 in pod pogojem, da je Komisija v skladu s členom 4 odločila, da je predlagana državljanska pobuda dopustna, organizator izjave o podpori v papirni ali elektronski obliki predloži pristojnim organom iz člena 14 v preverjanje in potrditev.
After having collected the necessary statements of support from signatories in accordance with Articles 5 and 7, and provided that the Commission has decided that a proposed citizens' initiative is admissible in accordance with Article 4 , the organiser shall submit the statements of support, in paper or in electronic form, to the relevant competent authorities provided for in Article 14 for verification and certification.
Organizator predloži izjave o podpori državi članici, v kateri imajo podpisniki stalno prebivališče .
The organiser shall submit statements of support to the Member State where the signatories have their permanent residence .
Ko imajo podpisniki stalno prebivališče v tretji državi, organizator predloži izjave o podpori državi članici, katere državljani so podpisniki.
Where signatories have their permanent residence in a third country, the organiser shall submit statements of support to the Member State of which they are nationals.
Pristojni organi v roku, ki ni daljši od treh mesecev, na podlagi vzorca preverijo predložene izjave o podpori in organizatorju izdajo potrdilo v skladu z vzorcem iz Priloge VII, ki potrjuje število veljavnih izjav o podpori za navedeno državo članico.
The competent authorities shall, within a period that shall not exceed three months, verify the statements of support provided on the basis of sample checks, and deliver to the organiser a certificate in accordance with the model set out in Annex VII, certifying the number of valid statements of support for that Member State.
Odstotek neveljavnih podpisov v vzorcu se odšteje od skupnega števila izjav o podpori.
The percentage of invalid signatures in the sample will be deducted from the overall number of statements of support.
Potrdilo se izda samo, če preostalo število izjav o podpori presega en milijon.
A certificate will only be issued if the remaining number of statements of support exceeds one million.
Namen tega člena je pospešiti preverjanje.
This article aims to make verification faster.
Če na primer državljanska pobuda zbere 1,5 milijona podpisov, lahko organ za preverjanje preveri 5000 naključnih vzorcev, vzetih iz celote.
If for example an ECI raises 1.5 million signatories the verifying authority may randomly check 5000 samples taken form the whole.
Če iz teh 5000 izhaja, da jih je 500 (ali 10 %) napačnih, nepopolnih ali nepreverljivih, potem je to mogoče ekstrapolirati na vse zbrane podpise, pri čemer se domneva, da je 10 % od 1,5 milijona podpisov napačnih.
If it results from those 5000 that 500 (or 10%) are false, incomplete or non-verifiable, then it may be extrapolated onto the entire collection of signatures, assuming that 10% of the 1.5 million signatories are false.
Zraven tega takšen sistem za popravek s preverjanjem vzorcev nasprotuje argumentu Komisije, da je za temeljito preverjanje veljavnosti podpisnikov potrebna identifikacijska številka.
Moreover, such a sample-check correction system also counters the argument put forth by the Commission that the ID number is needed for a thorough check of validity of the signatories.
a. državljansko pobudo brez odlašanja objavi na svoji spletni strani v vseh uradnih jezikih Unije ;
a. publish the citizens' initiative without delay on its website , in all the official languages of the Union ;
Vsi državljani EU bi morali imeti možnost razumeti vsebino predlagane državljanske pobude, da bi jo lahko podprli, potem ko jo odobri Evropska komisija.
All the EU citizens should be able to understand the content of the proposed citizens' initiative in order to support it, after its approval by the European Commission.
To se lahko doseže samo, če se pobude ob objavi na spletni strani Evropske komisije prevedejo v vse uradne jezike Evropske unije.
This could be achieved only if the initiatives are translated to all the official languages of the European Union, upon publication on the website of the European Commission.
b. prouči državljansko pobudo in v štirih mesecih v sporočilu izda svoje zaključke v zvezi s pobudo , morebitne ukrepe , ki jih namerava izvesti, in jih obrazloži.
b. examine the citizens' initiative and, within 4 months , set out in a communication its conclusions on the initiative, the action it intends to take, if any, and its reasons for doing so .
b. prouči državljansko pobudo in v treh mesecih v sporočilu izda svoje zaključke v zvezi s pobudo ter ustrezen predlog o zadevi, pri kateri so državljani navedli, da je potreben pravni akt .
b. examine the citizens' initiative and, within three months , set out in a communication its conclusions on the initiative, as well as the appropriate proposal on the matter where citizens have indicated that a legal act is required.
Če se Komisija odloči za kakšne druge ukrepe , ali da ne bo ukrepala, obrazloži svojo odločitev v sporočilu .
Should the Commission decide to take some alternative action , or not to take any action , it shall state its reasons for its decision in a communication .
Zato, da se Komisijo trdneje obveže nadaljnji obravnavi državljanskih pobud.
In order to create a stronger duty for the Commission to give a follow up to citizens' initiatives.
Komisija o sporočilu iz odstavka 1(b) uradno obvesti organizatorja državljanske pobude, Evropski parlament in Svet ter ga javno objavi.
The communication referred to in paragraph 1(b) shall be notified to the organiser of the citizens' initiative as well as to the European Parliament and the Council and shall be made public.
Komisija o seznamu predloženih državljanskih pobud ter sporočilu iz odstavka 1(b) uradno obvesti organizatorja državljanske pobude, Evropski parlament in Svet ter ga javno objavi.
The list of citizens' initiatives tabled, as well as the communication referred to in paragraph 1(b) , shall be notified to the organiser of the citizens' initiative as well as to the European Parliament and the Council and shall be made public.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži javno letno poročilo o izvajanju državljanskih pobud, v katerem je med drugim navedeno število predloženih pobud, njihova dopustnost in nadaljnja obravnava Komisije za vsako pobudo.
The Commission shall deliver a public annual report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of citizens' initiatives, indicating inter alia the number of initiatives submitted, their admissibility and the follow-up given by the Commission to each initiative.
In order to create a stronger duty for the Commission to give a follow up to citizens' initiatives.
In order to create a stronger duty for the Commission to give a follow up to citizens' initiatives.
Člen 11 – odstavek 2 b (novo)
Article 11 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Evropski parlament lahko glede državljanskih pobud, za katere je bilo zbranih milijon izjav o podpori, kadar koli pozove Komisijo, naj pojasni ukrepe, ki jih predvideva, oziroma, kar je tudi mogoče, odločitev, da ne bo ukrepala, in razloge za takšno odločitev.
With regard to citizens' initiatives in respect of which one million statements of support have been collected, the European Parliament can at any time call on the Commission to explain the actions it intends to take or, as the case may be, the decision not to take any action, and the reasons for doing so.
Pri izvajanju svojih pooblastil lahko Evropski parlament kadar koli pripravi predstavitve z organizatorji ali sprejme resolucijo.
In exercising its powers the European Parliament can at any time hold hearings of the organisers or adopt a resolution.
Organizatorji lahko Evropskemu parlamentu predložijo tudi peticijo o zadevi, če so izpolnjeni pogoji za to.
The organisers may also present a petition to the European Parliament on the subject, if the criteria for doing so are met.
Da bi se odzvali na pričakovanja državljanov in se izognili težavam, je pomembno, da Evropski parlament nudi druge možnosti in sodeluje pri razpravi ter tako pojasni sklep Komisije.
In order to respond to citizens' expectation and avoid frustration, it is important that the European Parliament offers other options and take a debate to clarify the Commission decision.
Člen 13 – točka (b)
Article 13 – point b
b. neizpolnjevanje pogojev za sisteme spletnega zbiranja;
b. non-conformity with the requirements for online collection systems;
Podpiramo zamisel o enem samem osrednjem spletnem mestu, ki bi ga vodila Komisija namesto spletnih mest, ki bi jih vzpostavljali posamezni pobudniki; tako bodo vedno upoštevani predpisi o varstvu podatkov.
We support the idea of one single, central website operated by the Commission instead of websites set up by each initiator; like this data protection regulations will always be met.
Komisija lahko z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členi 16, 17 in 18 sprejme spremembe prilog k tej uredbi.
The Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Articles 16, 17 and 18, amendments to the Annexes of this Regulation.
Komisija lahko z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členi 16, 17 in 18 sprejme spremembe prilog k tej uredbi , razen k prilogama II in III .
The Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Articles 16, 17 and 18, amendments to all the Annexes to this Regulation apart from Annexes II and III .
Komisija o njih obvesti države članice in Evropski parlament.
The Commission shall inform the other Member States and the European Parliament thereof.
Pričakovati, da bodo državljani, ki bodo sprožili pobudo, poznali pravno podlago iz Pogodb, ki Komisiji omogoča ukrepanje, ni realistično.
Expecting citizens launching an initiative to know the legal base of the Treaties which would allow the Commission to act is not realistic.
Ravno obratno, Komisija mora pregledati pobudo in njeno skladnost s pogodbami ter organizatorje seznaniti o njeni dopustnosti, utemeljiti svoj odgovor in ga objaviti.
On the contrary, it is the Commission’s job to examine an initiative and its compatibility with the Treaties and then to inform the organisers as to its admissibility, giving them precise reasons for its decision and publishing it.
Priloga III – polje 2 – točka 5 a (novo)
Annex III – Box 2 – point 5 a (new)
Prejeta finančna in politična podpora glede predlagane državljanske pobude*:
Financial and political support received in respect of the proposed citizens initiative*:
Priloga III – Polje 3
Annex III – Box 3
Polje 3: (izpolni podpisnik)
Box 3: (to be completed by signatory)
Vrsta identifikacijske številke / osebnega dokumenta*:
Type of identification number/identity document:
Datum in podpis podpisnika*: ………..
Date and signature of the signatory* ♦: ………..
Datum in podpis podpisnika* ♦: ………..
Date and signature of the signatory* ♦: ………..
Obrazec, ki potrjuje skladnost sistema spletnega zbiranja z Uredbo xxxx/xxxx
Certificate confirming the conformity of an online collection system with Regulation xxxx/xxxx
[….] [….] (ime pristojnega organa) iz [.…] (ime države članice) potrjuje, da sistem spletnega zbiranja [….] (spletni naslov), uporabljen za elektronsko zbiranje izjav o podpori državljanske pobude z evidenčno številko [….], izpolnjuje pogoje iz ustreznih določb Uredbe xxxx/xxxx.
[….] (name of competent authority) of [….](name of Member State ), hereby certifies that the online collection system [….] (website address) used for the electronic collection of statements of support for citizens' initiative having the registration number [….] complies with the relevant provisions of Regulation xxxx/xxxx.
Datum, podpis in žig pristojnega organa:
Date, signature and official stamp of the competent authority:
Predlog Komisije o tem, naj vsak pobudnik vzpostavi lastno spletno mesto, bi dodatno obremenil ne le pobudnike, ampak tudi države članice, ker bi te morale preverjati, ali so sistemi spletnega zbiranja v skladu s predpisi Komisije, izdati pa bi morale tudi potrdilo o skladnosti vsake spletne strani.
The Commission's proposal that each initiator should set up his/her own website would place an extra burden not only on the initiators, but on Member States as well, as they should verify the conformity of the online collection systems with the regulations set out by the Commission, and they should also issue a certificate confirming the conformity concerning each website.
Za odpravo takšne obremenitve smo prepričani, da bi Komisija morala vzpostaviti osrednje spletno mesto, kjer bi se hranile vse pobude.
To avoid this burden, we believe that the Commission should launch a central website to store all the initiatives.
Polno ime, poštni naslov in elektronski poštni naslov organizatorja ali, v primeru pravne osebe ali organizacije, njenega zakonitega zastopnika* :
Full name, postal address and e-mail address of the organiser or, in the case of a legal entity or organisation, its legal representative *:
Polno ime, poštni naslov in elektronski poštni naslov organizatorja.
Full name, postal address and e-mail address of the organiser *:
(Priložite vse izjave o podpori podpisnikov, ki so podrobno navedli osebno identifikacijsko številko, ki jo je izdala ista država članica.
(Include all statements of support from signatories having specified a personal identification number issued by the same Member State .
Po potrebi priložite ustrezna potrdila, ki potrjujejo, da sistem spletnega zbiranja izpolnjuje pogoje iz Uredbe xxxx/xxxx.)
If applicable, include the relevant certificate(s) certifying that the conformity of the online collection system with Regulation xxxx/xxxx )
(Priložite vse izjave o podpori podpisnikov)
(Include all statements of support from signatories)
Nekatere države članice EU svojim državljanom ne izdajajo osebnih izkaznic, zato bi bila uporaba državljanstva bolj primerna.
Some EU Member States do not issue identity cards for their citizens, therefore, the usage of citizenship would be more suitable.
Ker pa naj bi Komisija vzpostavila in vodila osrednje spletno mesto, državam članicam ne bo več treba preverjati skladnosti.
Moreover, since the Commission should set up and manage a central website, the verification of conformity by Member States is no longer required.
Polno ime, poštni naslov in elektronski poštni naslov organizatorja.
Full name, postal address and e-mail address of the organiser.
Sonia Alfano, Rita Borsellino, Emine Bozkurt, Simon Busuttil, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Salvatore Iacolino, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Nuno Melo, Louis Michel, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Carmen Romero López, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Valdemar Tomaševski, Wim van de Camp, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Sonia Alfano, Rita Borsellino, Emine Bozkurt, Simon Busuttil, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Salvatore Iacolino, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Nuno Melo, Louis Michel, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolaou, Carmen Romero López, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Valdemar Tomaševski, Wim van de Camp, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Alexander Alvaro, Edit Bauer, Andrew Henry William Brons, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Nadja Hirsch, Monika Hohlmeier, Ádám Kósa, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Jean Lambert, Stavros Lambrinidis, Petru Constantin Luhan, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Joanna Senyszyn, Cecilia Wikström
Alexander Alvaro, Edit Bauer, Andrew Henry William Brons, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Nadja Hirsch, Monika Hohlmeier, Ádám Kósa, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Jean Lambert, Stavros Lambrinidis, Petru Constantin Luhan, Mariya Nedelcheva, Joanna Senyszyn, Cecilia Wikström
Andrew Henry William Brons, Andrew Duff, Ashley Fox, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Zita Gurmai, Gerald Häfner, Stanimir Ilčev (Stanimir Ilchev), Constance Le Grip, Morten Messerschmidt, Potito Salatto, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, József Szájer, Indrek Tarand, Rafał Trzaskowski
Andrew Henry William Brons, Andrew Duff, Ashley Fox, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Zita Gurmai, Gerald Häfner, Stanimir Ilchev, Constance Le Grip, Morten Messerschmidt, Potito Salatto, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, József Szájer, Indrek Tarand, Rafał Trzaskowski
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0625 – C7‑0360/2010 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0625 – C7‑0360/2010 ),
1. (uredba ESPG),
1. , (EGF Regulation),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7‑0351/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7‑0351/2010 ),
C. ker mora biti finančna pomoč Evropske unije za odpuščene delavce dinamična ter na voljo čim hitreje in na najučinkovitejši način v skladu s skupno izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sprejeto na usklajevalnem sestanku 17. julija 2008, in ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 glede sprejetja sklepov za uporabo sredstev ESPG,
C. whereas the Union’s financial assistance to workers made redundant should be dynamic and made available as quickly and efficiently as possible, in accordance with the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008, and having due regard for the IIA of 17 May 2006 in respect of the adoption of decisions to mobilise the EGF,
D. ker je Španija zahtevala pomoč za 508 presežnih delavcev v podjetju Lear Automotive (EEDS) Spain, S.L. Sociedad Unipersonal, ki deluje v avtomobilskem sektorju,
D. whereas Spain has requested assistance in respect of cases concerning 508 redundancies in the enterprise Lear Automotive (EEDS) Spain, S.L. Sociedad Unipersonal, which operates in the automotive sector,
o uporabi Evropskega sklada za prilagajanje globalizaciji v skladu s točko 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/023 ES/Lear from Spain)
(4) Španija je 23. julija 2010 vložila vlogo za uporabo sredstev ESPG v zvezi s presežnimi delavci v podjetju Lear, do 10. avgusta 2010 pa jo je dopolnila z dodatnimi informacijami.
(4) Spain submitted an application to mobilise the EGF in respect of redundancies in the enterprise Lear on 23 July 2010 and supplemented it by additional information on 10 August 2010.
Komisija zato predlaga uporabo zneska v višini 382.200 EUR.
The Commission, therefore, proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 382 200.
(5) Zato je treba uporabiti sredstva ESPG, da se zagotovi finančni prispevek za vlogo, ki jo je vložila Španija.
(5) The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application submitted by Spain.
V okviru splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010 se iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (ESPG) uporabi vsota 382.200 EUR za sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in sredstva za plačila.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 382 200 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Komisija je 5. novembra 2010 sprejela nov predlog za sklep o uporabi sredstev sklada v korist Španije, da bi podprla ponovno vključevanje delavcev, ki so postali presežni zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize, na trg dela.
On 5 November 2010 the Commission has adopted a new proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Spain in order to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant due to the global financial and economic crisis.
To je trideseta vloga, ki jo je treba preučiti v okviru proračuna za leto 2010, in zadeva uporabo skupnega zneska v višini 382.200 EUR iz ESPG za Španijo.
This is the thirtieth application to be examined under the budget 2010 and refers to the mobilisation of a global amount of EUR 382.200 from the EGF for Spain.
Nanaša se na 515 presežnih delavcev (od katerih je za 508 predvidena pomoč) v podjetju Lear Automotive (EEDS) Spain, ki deluje v avtomobilskem sektorju v Kataloniji, in sicer za štirimesečno referenčno obdobje od 14. januarja do 14. maja 2010.
It concerns 515 redundancies (of which 508 targeted for assistance) in the enterprise Lear Automotive (EEDS) Spain, which operates in the automotive sector in Catalonia, during the fourth-month reference period from 14 January to 14 May 2010.
Ta vloga (zadeva EGF/2010/023 ES/Lear) je bila predložena Komisiji 23. julija 2010 in je bila do 10. avgusta 2010 dopolnjena z dodatnimi informacijami.
The application, case EGF/2010/023 ES/Lear was submitted to the Commission on 23 July 2010 and supplemented by additional information up to 10 August 2010.
Temeljila je na merilu za pomoč iz člena 2(a) uredbe ESPG, v skladu s katerim mora biti v obdobju štirih mesecev v podjetju, vključno z njegovimi dobavitelji in proizvajalci v poproizvodni fazi, odpuščenih vsaj 500 presežnih delavcev, in je bila predložena v roku 10 tednov (člen 5 te uredbe).
It was based on the intervention criterion of Art. 2 (a) of the EGF Regulation, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise, including its suppliers and downstream producers, and was submitted within the deadline of 10 weeks (Art. 5 of the Regulation).
Za uporabo sredstev sklada je Komisija proračunskemu organu predložila vlogo za prerazporeditev (DEC 45/2010) skupnega zneska 382.200 EUR iz rezerve za ESPG (40 02 43) za prevzem obveznosti ter iz proračunske vrstice „Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije – program za podjetništvo in inovacije“ (01 04 04) za plačila v proračunske vrstice ESPG (04 05 01).
In order to mobilise the Fund, the Commission has submitted to the Budget Authority a transfer request (DEC 45/2010) for a global amount of EUR 382.200 from the EGF reserve (40 02 43) in commitments and from the budget line "Competitiveness and innovation Framework Programme - Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme" (01 04 04) in payments to the EGF budget lines (04 05 01).