natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(2c) Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 3. septembra 2008 o kloniranju živali za preskrbo s hrano 1 pozval Komisijo, naj predstavi predloge, s katerimi se za preskrbo s hrano prepove (i) kloniranje živali, (ii) vzreja kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev, (iii) dajanje na trg mesa ali mlečnih izdelkov, pridobljenih iz kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev, ter (iv) uvoz kloniranih živali, njihovih potomcev, semena in zarodkov kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev, ter mesa ali mlečnih izdelkov, pridobljenih iz kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev.
(2c) The European Parliament called on the Commission, in its resolution of 3 September 2008 on the cloning of animals for food supply 1 , to submit proposals prohibiting for food supply purposes (i) the cloning of animals, (ii) the farming of cloned animals or their offspring, (iii) the placing on the market of meat or dairy products derived from cloned animals or their offspring and (iv) the importing of cloned animals, their offspring, semen and embryos from cloned animals or their offspring, and meat or dairy products derived from cloned animals or their offspring.
Predlog spremembe 5 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 5.
(2d) Znanstveni odbor Komisije za nastajajoča in na novo ugotovljena zdravstvena tveganja (ZONNUZT) je v svojem mnenju z dne 28. in 29. septembra 2005 ugotovil, "da obstajajo precejšne vrzeli v znanju, ki je potrebno za oceno tveganja.
(2d) The Commission's Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) adopted on 28-29 September 2005 an opinion which concluded that there are ‘major gaps in the knowledge necessary for risk assessment.
Predlog spremembe 6 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 6.
(3) Pravila Unije za nova živila so določena z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. januarja 1997 v zvezi z novimi živili in novimi živilskimi sestavinami in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1852/2001 z dne 20. septembra 2001 o podrobnih pravilih o dostopnosti določenih podatkov javnosti in varstvu podatkov, predloženih na podlagi Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 258/97.
(3) The Union's rules on novel foods were established by Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients and by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001 of 20 September 2001 laying down detailed rules for making certain information available to the public and for the protection of information submitted pursuant to European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 258/97 .
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 in Uredbo (ES) št. 1852/2001 razveljaviti, Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 pa nadomestiti s to uredbo.
For the sake of clarity, Regulation (EC) No 258/97 and Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001 should be repealed and Regulation (EC) No 258/97 should be replaced by this Regulation.
Priporočilo Komisije 97/618/ES z dne 29. julija 1997 o znanstvenih vidikih in predstavitvi informacij, potrebnih za podporo vlogam za dovoljenja za dajanje na trg novih živil in sestavin novih živil in pripravo poročil o začetni presoji v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta bi moralo postati neuporabno v zvezi z novimi živili.
Commission Recommendation 97/618/EC of 29 July 1997 concerning the scientific aspects and the presentation of information necessary to support applications for the placing on the market of novel foods and novel food ingredients and the preparation of initial assessment reports under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council should therefore become obsolete as regards novel foods .
(3) Pravila Unije za nova živila so določena z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. januarja 1997 v zvezi z novimi živili in novimi živilskimi sestavinami1 in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1852/2001 z dne 20. septembra 2001 o podrobnih pravilih o dostopnosti določenih podatkov javnosti in varstvu podatkov, predloženih na podlagi Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 258/972.
(3) The Union's rules on novel foods were established by Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients 1 and by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001 of 20 September 2001 laying down detailed rules for making certain information available to the public and for the protection of information submitted pursuant to European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 258/97 2 .
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 razveljaviti in nadomestiti s to uredbo.
For the sake of clarity, Regulation (EC) No 258/97 should be repealed and replaced by this Regulation.
Ta uredba mora vključevati ukrepe, ki jih sedaj ureja Uredba (ES) št. 1852/2001, in jo je treba razveljaviti.
Th is Regulation should include measures currently governed by Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001 and that Regulation should be repealed .
Uvodna izjava 3 iz dokumenta Komisije.
Recital 3 from the Commission document.
(5) Uporablja se Uredba (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane.
(5) Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety applies.
Obstoječo opredelitev novega živila bi bilo treba pojasniti in posodobiti ter nadomestiti obstoječe skupine in pri tem navesti sklic na splošno opredelitev živila iz navedene uredbe.
The existing definition of novel food should be clarified and updated by replacing the existing categories with a reference to the general definition of food in that Regulation.
(5) Obstoječo opredelitev novega živila bi bilo treba pojasniti z razlago meril za novost in posodobiti ter nadomestiti obstoječe skupine in pri tem navesti sklic na splošno opredelitev živila iz Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 .
(5) The existing definition of novel food should be clarified, with an explanation of the criteria for novelty, and updated by replacing the existing categories with a reference to the general definition of food in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 .
Predlog spremembe 8 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 8.
(5a) V skladu z opredelitvijo te uredbe se za nova štejejo živila z novo ali namenoma spremenjeno prvotno molekulsko strukturo, živila, ki jih sestavljajo mikroorganizmi, glive ali alge ali so iz njih pridobljena, novi sevi mikroorganizmov brez preteklih izkušenj o varni uporabi, pa tudi koncentrati snovi, ki se naravno pojavijo v rastlinah.
(5a) Foods with a new or intentionally modified primary molecular structure, foods consisting of, or isolated from, micro-organisms, fungi or algae, new strains of micro-organism with no history of safe use and concentrates of substances that naturally occur in plants should be considered as novel foods as defined in this Regulation.
Predlog spremembe 9 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 9.
(6) Treba bi bilo tudi pojasniti, da se mora živilo šteti za novo, če se proizvaja s tehnologijo, ki prej še ni bila uporabljena za proizvodnjo živil v Uniji .
(6) It should also be clarified that a food is to be considered as novel when a production technology which was not previously used for food production in the Union is applied to that food.
V uredbi bi morale biti zajete zlasti najnovejše tehnologije pri postopkih gojenja in proizvodnje živil, ki vplivajo na živila in bi zato lahko vplivale na njihovo varnost.
In particular, emerging technologies in breeding and food production processes which have an impact on food, and thus might have an impact on food safety, should be covered by this Regulation.
Med nova živila bi morali zato šteti živila iz živali in njihovih mladičev , proizvedena z netradicionalnimi tehnikami vzreje, in živila iz rastlin, proizvedena z netradicionalnimi tehnikami gojenja, ter živila, proizvedena z novimi proizvodnimi postopki, ki bi lahko vplivali na živila , in živila, ki vsebujejo ali so sestavljena iz namensko proizvedenih nanomaterialov .
Novel food should therefore include foods derived from animals produced by non-traditional breeding techniques and from their offspring , foods derived from plants produced by non-traditional breeding techniques, foods produced by new production processes which might have an impact on food, and foods containing or consisting of engineered nanomaterials.
Živila iz novih rastlinskih sort ali živalskih pasem, proizvedena s tradicionalnimi tehnikami gojenja ali vzreje, se ne bi smela šteti za nova živila.
Foods derived from new plant varieties or animal breeds produced by traditional breeding techniques should not be considered as novel foods.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se živila, ki izvirajo iz tretjih držav in ki so nova v Uniji, lahko štejejo za tradicionalna le, če so pridobljena v primarni proizvodnji, kakor je opredeljena v Uredbi (ES) št. 178/2002, bodisi da so predelana, ali nepredelana (npr. sadje, marmelada, sadni sok).
Furthermore, it should be clarified that foods from third countries which are novel in the Union can be considered as traditional only when they are derived from primary production as defined in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, whether they are processed or unprocessed (e.g. fruit, jam, fruit juice).
Vendar pa živila, ki so pridobljena na tak način, ne bi smela vsebovati živil, proizvedenih iz živali ali rastlin, za katere se je uporabljala netradicionalna tehnika vzreje ali gojenja ali živil, proizvedenih iz mladičev takih živali, ter živil, za katera se uporablja nov proizvodni postopek.
However, foods thus obtained should neither include foods produced from animals or plants to which a non-traditional breeding technique was applied or foods produced from the offspring of such animals, nor foods to which a new production process is applied.
(6) Treba bi bilo tudi pojasniti, da se mora živilo šteti za novo, če se proizvaja s tehnologijo, ki prej še ni bila uporabljena za proizvodnjo živil , ki se tržijo in uporabljajo .
(6) It should also be clarified that a food should be considered as novel when a production technology which was not previously used for the production of foods to be marketed and consumed is applied to that food.
V uredbi bi morale biti zajete zlasti najnovejše tehnologije pri postopkih gojenja in proizvodnje živil, ki vplivajo na živila in bi zato lahko vplivale na njihovo varnost.
In particular, emerging technologies in breeding and food production processes, which have an impact on food and thus might have an impact on food safety, should be covered by this Regulation.
Med nova živila bi morali zato šteti živila iz rastlin in živali, proizvedena z netradicionalnimi tehnikami gojenja in vzreje, in živila, spremenjena z novimi proizvodnimi postopki, kot sta nanotehnologija in nanoznanost , ki bi lahko vplivali na živila.
Novel food should therefore include foods derived from plants and animals, produced by non-traditional breeding techniques, and foods modified by new production processes, such as nanotechnology and nanoscience, which might have an impact on food.
Živila iz novih rastlinskih sort ali živalskih pasem, proizvedena s tradicionalnimi tehnikami gojenja ali vzreje, se ne bi smela šteti za nova živila.
Foods derived from new plant varieties, or animal breeds produced by traditional breeding techniques, should not be considered as novel foods.
Uvodna izjava 6 iz dokumenta Komisije.
Recital 6 from the Commission document.
(6a) Kloniranje živali ni v skladu s točko 20 Priloge Direktive Sveta 98/58/ES z dne 20. julija 1998 o zaščiti rejnih živali 1 , ki določa, da metode ekstenzivne ali intenzivne reje, ki povzročajo ali lahko povzročijo trpljenje ali poškodbo katere koli zadevne živali, niso dovoljene.
(6a) The cloning of animals is incompatible with Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes 1 , point 20 of the Annex of which states that natural or artificial breeding procedures which cause , or are likely to cause , suffering or injury to any of the animals concerned must not be practised.
Živila, pridobljena iz kloniranih živali ali njihovih potomcev, se tako ne smejo uvrstiti na seznam Unije.
Food from cloned animals or their descendants must therefore not be placed on the Union list.
Predlog spremembe 11 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 11.
(7) Ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske skupine za etiko v znanosti in novih tehnologijah, ustanovljene s Sklepom Komisije z dne 16. decembra 1997, z dne 16. januarja 2008 in mnenja Evropske agencije za varnost hrane, sprejetega 15. julija 2008, imajo tehnike kloniranja živali, kot denimo prenos jedra somatske celice, posebne značilnosti, kar pomeni, da ta uredba ne more urejati vseh vidikov kloniranja .
(7) However, in the light of the opinion of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, established by Commission Decision of 16 December 1997 , issued on 16 January 2008 and of the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority adopted on 15 July 2008, techniques for the cloning of animals, such as somatic cell nuclear transfer, have specific characteristics such that this Regulation cannot address all the issues of cloning.
Zato bi morala v primerih živil, proizvedenih iz živali s tehniko kloniranja in iz njihovih mladičev, Komisija posredovati poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, čemur bi po potrebi sledil zakonodajni predlog.
Therefore, food produced from animals obtained by using a cloning technique and from the offspring thereof should be subject to a report submitted by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, followed, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
Če se sprejme posebna zakonodaja, bi bilo treba ustrezno prilagoditi področje uporabe te uredbe.
If specific legislation is adopted, the scope of this Regulation should be adapted accordingly.
(7) Evropska skupina za etiko v znanosti in novih tehnologijah, ustanovljene s Sklepom Komisije z dne 16. decembra 1997, v svojem mnenju št. 23 z dne 16. januarja 2008 o etičnih vidikih kloniranja živali za preskrbo s hrano navedla, da „ni prepričljivih dokazov, ki bi upravičili proizvodnjo hrane iz klonov in njihovih potomcev“ .
(7) The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, stablished by Commission Decision of 16 December 1997, stated in its Opinion (No. 23) of 16 January 2008 on ethical aspects of animal cloning for food supply that it ‘does not see convincing arguments to justify the production of food from clones and their offspring’.
Znanstveni odbor Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA) v svojem mnenju z dne 15. julija 2008 o kloniranju živali1 ugotavlja, da sta "zdravje in dobro počutje precejšnjega dela klonov ... zelo in pogosto življenjsko ogrožena".
The Scientific Committee of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded in its Opinion of 15 July 2008 on animal cloning 1 that ‘ the health and welfare of a significant proportion of clones … have been found to be adversely affected, often severely and with a fatal outcome’.
Predlog spremembe 12 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 12.
(7a) Samo nanomateriali na seznamu odobrenih snovi so lahko prisotni v embalaži živila, skupaj z mejno količino teh snovi, ki lahko preide v ali na živilske proizvode v tovrstni embalaži.
(7a) Only nanomaterials entered in a list of approved substances should be present in food packaging, accompanied by a limit on migration into or onto the food products contained in such packaging.
Predlog spremembe 13 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 13.
(7b) Vendar bi morala biti živila, pridobljena iz kloniranih živali in njihovih potomcev, izvzeta iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
(7b) Foods derived from cloned animals and their descendants should, however, be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Obravnavati jih je treba v posebni uredbi, sprejeti po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, ne pa po enotnem postopku odobritve.
They should be dealt with in a specific regulation, adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, and not be subject to the common authorisation procedure.
Komisija bi morala pred datumom začetka uporabe te uredbe predložiti ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
Before the date of application of this Regulation, the Commission should put forward a corresponding legislative proposal.
Dokler ne začne veljati uredba o kloniranih živalih, je treba uvesti moratorij za dajanje na trg živil, proizvedenih iz kloniranih živali in njihovih potomcev.
Pending the entry into force of a regulation on cloned animals, a moratorium should be imposed on the placing on the market of foods manufactured from cloned animals and their descendants .
Predlog spremembe 14 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 14.
(8) Treba bi bilo sprejeti izvedbene ukrepe, da se določijo merila za lažjo oceno, ali so se živila uporabljala v pomembnem obsegu za prehrano ljudi v Uniji pred 15. majem 1997.
(8) Implementing measures should be adopted to provide for criteria to facilitate the assessment of whether a food was used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before 15 May 1997.
Če se je živilo pred tem datumom uporabljalo izključno kot prehransko dopolnilo ali njegova sestavina, kot je opredeljeno v Direktivi 2002/46/ES, bi se moralo dovoliti, da se to živilo po tem dnevu daje na trg v Uniji za isto uporabo in se ne šteje za novo živilo.
If, prior to that date , a food was used exclusively as, or in, a food supplement, as defined in Directive 2002/46/EC , it should be allowed to be placed on the market within the Union after that date for the same use without being considered a novel food.
Vendar se uporaba živila kot prehranskega dopolnila ali v prehranskem dopolnilu ne bi smela upoštevati pri oceni o tem, ali se je živilo uporabljalo v pomembnem obsegu za prehrano ljudi v Uniji pred 15. majem 1997.
However, that use as, or in, a food supplement should not be taken into account for the assessment of whether the food was used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before 15 May 1997.
Zato bi bilo treba v skladu s to uredbo odobriti tudi druge načine uporabe zadevnega živila in ne le kot prehransko dopolnilo ali njegova sestavina.
Therefore, uses of the food concerned other than in, or as , a food supplement should be authorised in accordance with this Regulation.
(8) Treba bi bilo sprejeti izvedbene ukrepe, da se določijo dodatna nadaljnja merila za lažjo oceno, ali so se živila uporabljala v pomembnem obsegu za prehrano ljudi v Uniji pred 15. majem 1997.
(8) Implementing measures should be adopted to provide for further criteria in order to facilitate the assessment of whether a food was used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before 15 May 1997.
Če se je živilo uporabljalo izključno kot prehransko dopolnilo ali njegova sestavina, kot je opredeljeno v Direktivi 2002/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. junija 2002 o približevanju zakonodaj držav članic o prehranskih dopolnilih 1 , pred tem datumom , se lahko to živilo po tem dnevu daje na trg za isto uporabo in se ne šteje za novo živilo.
If a food was used exclusively as, or in, a food supplement, as defined in Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to food supplements 1 , prior to that date , it can be placed on the market after that date for the same use without being considered as a novel food.
Vendar se uporaba živila kot prehranskega dopolnila ali v prehranskem dopolnilu ne bi smela upoštevati pri oceni o tem, ali se je uporabljalo v pomembnem obsegu za prehrano ljudi v Uniji pred 15. majem 1997.
However, that use as, or in, a food supplement should not be taken into account for the assessment of whether it was used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before 15 May 1997.
Zato je treba v skladu s to uredbo odobriti tudi druge načine uporabe zadevnega živila, in sicer ne le uporabo kot prehransko dopolnilo.
Therefore, other uses of the food concerned , namely other than food supplement uses , have to be authorised in accordance with this Regulation.
Predlog spremembe 15 iz prve obravnave EP.
EP first reading amendment 15.
(9) Uporaba namensko proizvedenih nanomaterialov v proizvodnji živil se lahko z nadaljnjim razvojem tehnologije poveča.
(9) The use of engineered nanomaterials in food production might increase with the further development of technology.
Da bi zagotovili visoko stopnjo zaščite zdravja ljudi, prosti pretok blaga in pravno varnost za proizvajalce, je treba razviti skupno opredelitev namensko proizvedenih nanomaterialov na mednarodni ravni .
In order to ensure a high level of protection of human health, free movement of goods and legal certainty for manufacturers, it is necessary to develop a uniform definition for engineered nanomaterial at international level.
Unija naj si prizadeva doseči dogovor o opredelitvi na ustreznih mednarodnih forumih.
The Union should endeavour to reach an agreement on a definition in appropriate international fora.
Če bo tak dogovor dosežen, bi se morala opredelitev namensko proizvedenih nanomaterialov v tej uredbi ustrezno prilagoditi.
Should such an agreement be reached, the definition of engineered nanomaterial in this Regulation should be adapted accordingly
Da bi zagotovili visoko stopnjo zaščite zdravja ljudi, je treba razviti skupno opredelitev namensko proizvedenih nanomaterialov.
In order to ensure a high level of protection of human health, it is necessary to develop a uniform definition for engineered nanomaterial s .
(10) Živilski proizvodi, proizvedeni iz sestavin živil, ki jih ta uredba ne ureja, zlasti s spremembo sestavin živil, spremembo njihove sestave ali količine se ne bi smeli šteti za nova živila.
(10) Food products produced from food ingredients that do not fall within the scope of this Regulation , in particular by changing the ingredients of the food, their composition or amount, should not be considered as novel food.
Vendar pa bi morale modifikacije sestavin živil, kot so npr. selektivni ekstrakti ali uporaba tistih delov rastline, ki se do zdaj v Uniji še niso uporabljali za prehrano ljudi, še naprej spadati v področje uporabe te uredbe.
However, modifications of a food ingredient, e.g. selective extracts or the use of other parts of a plant, that have so far not been used for human consumption within the Union, should still fall within the scope of this Regulation .
(10) Preoblikovani živilski proizvodi, proizvedeni iz obstoječih sestavin živil, ki so na voljo na trgu Unije , zlasti živilski proizvodi, preoblikovani s spremembo sestave ali količin teh sestavin , se ne bi smeli šteti za nova živila.
(10) Reformulated food products produced from existing food ingredients available on the market within the Union , in particular those reformulated by changing the composition or amounts of those food ingredients , should not be considered as novel food.
Uvodna izjava 8 iz dokumenta Komisije.
Recital 8 from Commission document.
(13) Živila, ki so namenjena tehnološki uporabi ali so gensko spremenjena, ne bi smela soditi v področje uporabe te uredbe.
(13) Foods which are intended for technological uses or which are genetically modified should not fall within the scope of this Regulation.