natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V nekaterih državah je starost sklenitve zakonske zveze zelo nizka, vendar to nima nikakršne zveze s stopnjo zrelosti ali samostojnosti mladoletnika.
In some countries the marriageable age may be very low, but this has no bearing on the degree of maturity or independence of the minor concerned.
(a) če se z mladoletnikom brez spremstva opravlja osebni razgovor v zvezi z njegovo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito , kot je urejen v členih 13, 14 in 15, ta razgovor vodi oseba, ki razpolaga s potrebnim znanjem o posebnih potrebah mladoletnikov;
(a) If an unaccompanied minor has a personal interview on his/her application for international protection as referred to in Articles 13, 14 and 15 that interview is conducted by a person who has the necessary knowledge of the special needs of minors;
(a) če se z mladoletnikom brez spremstva opravlja osebni razgovor v zvezi z njegovo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito , kot je urejen v členih 13, 14 in 15, ta razgovor vodi oseba, ki razpolaga s potrebnim znanjem o posebnih potrebah in pravicah mladoletnikov;
(a) If an unaccompanied minor has a personal interview on his/her application for international protection as referred to in Articles 13, 14 and 15 that interview is conducted by a person who has the necessary knowledge of the special needs and rights of minors;
Člen 21 – odstavek 3 – točka b
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) uradna oseba, ki razpolaga s potrebnim znanjem o posebnih potrebah mladoletnikov, pripravi odločbo organa za presojo v zvezi s prošnjo mladoletnika brez spremstva.
(b) an official with the necessary knowledge of the special needs of minors prepares the decision by the determining authority on the application of an unaccompanied minor.
(b) uradna oseba, ki razpolaga s potrebnim znanjem o posebnih potrebah in pravicah mladoletnikov, pripravi odločbo organa za presojo v zvezi s prošnjo mladoletnika brez spremstva.
(b) an official with the necessary knowledge of the special needs and rights of minors prepares the decision by the determining authority on the application of an unaccompanied minor.
Mladoletnikom brez spremstva je ob upoštevanju pogojev iz člena 18 zagotovljena brezplačna pravna pomoč v zvezi z vsemi postopki iz te direktive .
Subject to the conditions set out in Article 18, unaccompanied minors shall be granted free legal assistance with respect to all procedures provided for in this Directive .
Mladoletnikom brez spremstva in imenovanemu zastopniku je ob upoštevanju pogojev iz člena 18 zagotovljeno brezplačno svetovanje o postopkovnih in pravnih vidikih ter brezplačno pravno zastopanje .
Subject to the conditions set out in Article 18, unaccompanied minors together with their appointed representative shall , with respect to all procedures provided for in this Directive, be granted free legal advice on procedural and legal aspects and free legal representation .
Člen 21 – odstavek 5 – pododstavek 1
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Države članice lahko za določitev starosti mladoletnikov brez spremstva v okviru obravnavanja prošnje za mednarodno zaščito opravijo zdravniške preglede , če imajo države članice po splošnih izjavah mladoletnika ali na podlagi drugih zadevnih dokazov še vedno pomisleke glede njegove starosti .
Member States may use medical examinations to determine the age of unaccompanied minors within the framework of the examination of an application for international protection , where, following his/her general statements or other relevant evidence, Member States still have doubts concerning his/her age.
Države članice lahko za določitev starosti mladoletnikov brez spremstva v okviru obravnavanja prošnje za mednarodno zaščito opravijo zdravniške preglede , če imajo države članice po splošnih izjavah mladoletnika ali na podlagi drugih zadevnih dokazov še vedno pomisleke glede njegove starosti .
Member States may use medical examinations to determine the age of unaccompanied minors within the framework of the examination of an application for international protection, where, following his/her general statements or other relevant evidence, Member States still have doubts concerning his/her age.
Če ti pomisleki po zdravniškem pregledu ostajajo, se vse odločitve vedno sprejmejo v prid mladoletnika brez spremstva.
If those doubts persist after the medical examination, any decision shall always be for the benefit of the unaccompanied minor.
Člen 21 – Odstavek 5 – Pododstavek 2
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Vsi zdravniški pregledi se izvajajo ob spoštovanju posameznikovega dostojanstva in z izbiro tistih pregledov, ki najmanj posegajo v zasebnost.
Any medical examination shall be performed in full respect of the individual’s dignity, selecting the less invasive exams.
Ne zadeva slovenske različice.
Does not affect the English version .
Ne zadeva slovenske različice.
Linguistic amendment to the German version, bringing it closer to the English ( ‘ less invasive ’ ) .
Vsi zdravniški pregledi se izvajajo ob spoštovanju posameznikovega dostojanstva in z izbiro tistih pregledov, ki najmanj posegajo v zasebnost.
Any medical examination shall be performed in full respect of the individual's dignity, selecting the less invasive exams.
Vsi zdravniški pregledi se izvajajo ob spoštovanju posameznikovega dostojanstva in z izbiro tistih pregledov, ki so najbolj zanesljivi in najmanj posegajo v zasebnost, opravljajo pa jih usposobljeni in nepristranski zdravstveni delavci .
Any medical examination shall be performed in full respect of the individual's dignity, selecting the most reliable and the less invasive exams and carried out by qualified and impartial medical experts .
Člen 21 – odstavek 5 – pododstavek 3 – točka a
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 – point a
(a) se mladoletnike brez spremstva pred obravnavanjem njihove prošnje za mednarodno zaščito obvesti o možnosti določitve starosti z zdravniškim pregledom, in sicer v jeziku, ki ga razumejo.
(a) unaccompanied minors are informed prior to the examination of their application for international protection , and in a language which they understand, of the possibility that their age may be determined by medical examination.
Obvestilo vključuje podatke o načinu pregleda in o možnih posledicah rezultata zdravniškega pregleda za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito ter tudi o posledicah, če mladoletnik brez spremstva odkloni takšen zdravniški pregled;
This shall include information on the method of examination and the possible consequences of the result of the medical examination for the examination of the application for international protection , as well as the consequences of refusal on the part of the unaccompanied minor to undergo the medical examination;
(a) se mladoletnike brez spremstva pred obravnavanjem njihove prošnje za azil obvesti o možnosti določitve starosti z zdravniškim pregledom, in sicer v jeziku, za katerega se lahko upravičeno domneva , da ga razumejo.
(a) unaccompanied minors are informed prior to the examination of their application for international protection, and in a language which they may reasonably be supposed to understand, of the possibility that their age may be determined by medical examination.
Obvestilo vključuje podatke o načinu pregleda in o možnih posledicah rezultata zdravniškega pregleda za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito ter tudi o posledicah, če mladoletnik brez spremstva odkloni takšen zdravniški pregled;
This shall include information on the method of examination and the possible consequences of the result of the medical examination for the examination of the application for international protection, as well as the consequences of refusal on the part of the unaccompanied minor to undergo the medical examination;
Iz praktičnih razlogov in težavnosti dokazovanja znanja jezika se daje prednost besedilu veljavne direktive.
For practical reasons and in view of the difficulty of proving language proficiency, the wording of the current Directive is preferable.
Člen 21 – odstavek 5 – pododstavek 3 – točka c
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 – point c
(c) odločba o zavrnitvi prošnje za mednarodno zaščito mladoletnika brez spremstva, ki je odklonil takšen zdravniški pregled, ne temelji izključno na tej odklonitvi.
(c) the decision to reject an application for international protection from an unaccompanied minor who refused to undergo this medical examination shall not be based solely on that refusal.
(c) odločba o zavrnitvi prošnje za mednarodno zaščito mladoletnika brez spremstva, ki je odklonil takšen zdravniški pregled, ne temelji na tej odklonitvi.
(c) the decision to reject an application for international protection from an unaccompanied minor who refused to undergo this medical examination shall not be based on that refusal.
Razlogi, zakaj mladoletnik brez spremstva odkloni zdravniški pregled, so lahko številni in nepovezani z njegovo starostjo ali prošnjo za zaščito.
A minor’s refusal to undergo this medical examination may be based on a variety of reasons not connected with his or her age or the grounds for his or her application for protection.
Pridržanje mladoletnikov
Detention of minors
Pridržanje mladoletnikov je v vsakem primeru strogo prepovedano.
The detention of minors shall be strictly prohibited in all circumstances.
Če nacionalno pravo države članice dopušča možnost izrecnega umika prošnje, države članice v primeru, da prosilec izrecno umakne svojo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito , zagotovijo, da organ za presojo izda sklep o ustavitvi postopka ali odločbo o zavrnitvi prošnje .
Insofar as Member States provide for the possibility of explicit withdrawal of the application under national law, when an applicant explicitly withdraws his/her application for international protection, Member States shall ensure that the determining authority takes a decision to either discontinue the examination or reject the application .
Če nacionalno pravo države članice dopušča možnost izrecnega umika prošnje, države članice v primeru, da prosilec izrecno umakne svojo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito, zagotovijo, da organ za presojo izda sklep o ustavitvi postopka in prosilcu razloži posledice umika prošnje .
Insofar as Member States provide for the possibility of explicit withdrawal of the application under national law, when an applicant explicitly withdraws his/her application for international protection, Member States shall ensure that the determining authority takes a decision to discontinue the examination , and explain to the applicant the consequences of the withdrawal .
Izrecnemu umiku prošnje bi morala slediti ustavitev postopka in ne zavrnitev prošnje.
Explicit withdrawal of an application should result in closure of the procedure and not rejection of the application.
Odločba o zavrnitvi prošnje je lahko sprejeta le zatem, ko je bila prošnja temeljito preučena.
A decision to reject an application should only be taken after consideration of its substance.
Države članice zagotovijo, da sme prosilec, ki se ponovno javi pristojnemu organu po izdaji sklepa o ustavitvi postopka iz odstavka 1 tega člena, zahtevati ponovno obravnavanje.
Member States shall ensure that the applicant who reports again to the competent authority after a decision to discontinue as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article is taken, is entitled to request that his/her case be reopened .
Med azilnim postopkom je mogoče zahtevo za ponovno obravnavanje vložiti le enkrat.
Only one request for a case to be reopened may be submitted during an asylum procedure.
Člen 26 – točka b
Article 26 – point b
(b) ne pridobivajo nikakršnih podatkov od zatrjevanih subjektov preganjanja ali subjektov, ki jim lahko resno škodujejo, tako, da bi bili ti subjekti neposredno obveščeni, da je zadevni prosilec vložil prošnjo za azil, kar bi ogrozilo telesno integriteto prosilca in nepreskrbljene osebe ali svobodo in varnost njegovih družinskih članov, ki še vedno živijo v izvorni državi.
(b) obtain any information from the alleged actor(s) of persecution or serious harm in a manner that would result in such actor(s) being directly informed of the fact that an application has been made by the applicant in question, and would jeopardise the physical integrity of the applicant and his/her dependants, or the liberty and security of his/her family members still living in the country of origin.
(b) ne pridobivajo nikakršnih podatkov od zatrjevanih subjektov preganjanja ali subjektov, ki jim lahko resno škodujejo, tako, da bi bili ti subjekti obveščeni, da je zadevni prosilec vložil prošnjo za azil, kar bi ogrozilo telesno integriteto prosilca in nepreskrbljene osebe ali svobodo in varnost njegovih družinskih članov, ki še vedno živijo v izvorni državi.
(b) obtain any information from the alleged actor(s) of persecution or serious harm in a manner that would result in such actor(s) being informed of the fact that an application has been made by the applicant in question, and would jeopardise the physical integrity of the applicant and his/her dependants, or the liberty and security of his/her family members still living in the country of origin.
V skladu z zahtevo iz odstavka (a) tega člena.
In the interests of consistency with the requirement laid down in point (a) of the same article.
Če odločitev ni sprejeta v rokih iz odstavka 3, se posledice za to določijo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom .
The consequences of failure to adopt a decision within the time limits provided for in paragraph 3 shall be determined in accordance with national law .
Če odločitev ni sprejeta, mora po koncu obdobja, določenega v odstavku 3, dokaze za izpodbijanje priznanja zaščite prosilcu predložiti organ za presojo .
At the end of the period referred to in paragraph 3, in the event of failure to adopt a decision , the burden of proof for challenging the granting of protection to an applicant shall be on the determining authority .
Da bi omejili različne razlage in uporabe postopkov, ki bi bile v nasprotju s ciljem uskladitve skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, je treba določiti, kakšne bodo posledice, kadar odločitev ne bo sprejeta v predpisanem roku.
In order to prevent differences of interpretation and application, which would run counter to the objective of harmonising the common European asylum system, the consequences of failure to adopt a decision within the time limits provided for must be determined.
Člen 27 – odstavek 5 – uvodni del
Article 27 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Države članice lahko v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II prednostno obravnavajo posamezno prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito :
Member States may prioritise an examination of an application for international protection in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II:
Organi za presojo lahko v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II prednostno obravnavajo posamezno prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito:
The determining authorities may prioritise an examination of an application for international protection in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II:
(b) če gre za prosilca s posebnimi potrebami;
(b) where the applicant has special needs;
(b) če gre za prosilca s posebnimi potrebami, zlasti za mladoletnike brez spremstva ;
(b) where the applicant has special needs , in particular unaccompanied minors ;
Člen 27 – odstavek 6 – točka d a (novo)
Article 27 – paragraph 6 – point d a (new)
(da) so bile prosilčeve navedbe očitno nekonsistentne, protislovne, malo verjetne, nezadostne ali lažne, zaradi česar je njegova prošnja očitno neprepričljiva glede trditve, da je prosilec žrtev preganjanja v smislu Direktive […./../ES][direktive o zahtevanih pogojih]; ali
(da) the applicant has made clearly inconsistent, contradictory, improbable, insufficient or false representations which make his/her claim clearly unconvincing in relation to his/her having been the object of persecution referred to in Directive […./../EC] [the Qualification Directive]; or
Prav je, da se člen 23(4)(g) Direktive 2005/85/ES ohrani.
Article 23(4)(g) of Directive 2005/85/EC should be maintained.
Možnost za zavrnitev v postopku pospešenega obravnavanja je treba določiti tudi za primere, ko so navedbe prosilca za zaščito očitno neverodostojne in neverjetne.
The possibility of rejecting an application in an accelerated procedure should also be provided for cases in which the submissions made by persons seeking protection are clearly unreliable and unbelievable.
Člen 27 – odstavek 6 – točka e
Article 27 – paragraph 6 – point e
(e) je prošnjo vložil neporočen mladoletnik, za katerega se uporablja člen 6(7)(c), potem ko je bila prošnja staršev ali starša, ki zanj odgovarja(-ta), zavrnjena, in v njej ni navedel nikakršnih novih pomembnih elementov o okoliščinah, ki ga zadevajo, ali o razmerah v njegovi izvorni državi; or
(e) the application was made by an unmarried minor to whom Article 6 (7) (c) applies, after the application of the parents or parent responsible for the minor has been rejected and no relevant new elements were raised with respect to his/her particular circumstances or to the situation in his/her country of origin; or
Glej obrazložitev predloga spremembe 9.
See justification to Amendment 9.
Člen 27 – odstavek 6 – točka f c (novo)
Article 27 – paragraph 6 – point f c (new)
(fc) prosilec zaradi resnih razlogov lahko predstavlja grožnjo za nacionalno varnost države članice ali če je bil prosilec zaradi resnih razlogov javne varnosti in javnega reda po nacionalnem pravu prisilno izgnan.
(fc) the applicant may for serious reasons be considered a danger to the national security of the Member State , or the applicant has been forcibly expelled for serious reasons of public security and public order under national law.
Prav je, da se člen 23(4)(m) Direktive 2005/85/ES ohrani.
Article 23(4)(m) of Directive 2005/85/EC should be maintained.
Možnost takojšnje odstranitve oseb, ki predstavljajo grožnjo za varnost, je nujno potrebna v času, ko teroristične mreže delujejo na globalni ravni.
The possibility of ordering the immediate removal of persons posing a risk to security is urgently necessary in an age when terrorist networks operate globally.
Člen 27 – odstavek 9
Article 27 – paragraph 9
Dejstvo, da je bila prošnja za mednarodno zaščito vložena po nezakonitem vstopu na ozemlje ali na meji, vključno s tranzitnimi območji, ter odsotnost dokumentov ali uporaba ponarejenih dokumentov sami po sebi ne pomenijo samodejne uporabe postopka pospešenega obravnavanja.
The fact that an application for international protection was submitted after an irregular entry into the territory or at the border, including in transit zones, as well as the lack of documents or use of forged documents, shall not per se entail an automatic recourse to an accelerated examination procedure.
Dejstvo, da je bila prošnja za mednarodno zaščito vložena po nezakonitem vstopu na ozemlje ali na meji, vključno s tranzitnimi območji, ter odsotnost dokumentov pri vstopu ali uporaba ponarejenih dokumentov sami po sebi ne pomenijo samodejne uporabe postopka pospešenega obravnavanja.
The fact that an application for international protection was submitted after an irregular entry into the territory or at the border, including in transit zones, as well as the lack of documents on entry or the use of forged documents, shall not per se entail an automatic recourse to an accelerated examination procedure.
Prosilci za azil so lahko prisiljeni k uporabi lažnih ali ponarejenih potnih listin za izstop iz države, kjer so preganjani.
Asylum seekers may find themselves obliged to use forged travel documents in order to leave the country of persecution.
Vsekakor pa morajo pri vstopu organom za presojo razkriti svojo pravo identiteto.
They must however reveal their true identity to the determining authority after entry.
Posameznikovo zgodbo o preganjanju je mogoče ugotoviti le, če sta znana identiteta in državljanstvo prosilca.
An individual case history of persecution can only be established if the identity and nationality of the applicant are known.
Če je posameznikom, katerih identiteta ni znana zaradi zavračanja sodelovanja, dovoljeno ostati, to predstavlja veliko grožnjo za varnost.
It is a major security risk to allow persons to remain whose identity has not been established due to a refusal on their part to cooperate.
Ne glede na člen 23 države članice štejejo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito za neutemeljeno le, če je organ za presojo ugotovil, da prosilec ne izpolnjuje pogojev za mednarodno zaščito v skladu z Direktivo […./../ES] [direktiva o zahtevanih pogojih].
Without prejudice to Article 23, Member States shall only consider an application for international protection as unfounded if the determining authority has established that the applicant does not qualify for international protection pursuant to Directive […./../EC] [the Qualification Directive].
Države članice štejejo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito za neutemeljeno le, če je organ za presojo ugotovil, da prosilec ne izpolnjuje pogojev za mednarodno zaščito v skladu z Direktivo […./../ES] [direktiva o zahtevanih pogojih].
Member States shall only consider an application for international protection as unfounded if the determining authority has established that the applicant does not qualify for international protection pursuant to Directive […./../EC] [the Qualification Directive].
Prošnja za mednarodno zaščito je lahko obravnavana kot neutemeljena le, če je organ za presojo ugotovil, da prosilec ne izpolnjuje pogojev za zaščito.
An application for international protection should be considered unfounded if, and only if, the determining authority has established that the applicant does not meet the necessary conditions.
Države članice prosilcem omogočijo, da predstavijo svoje mnenje v zvezi z uporabo razlogov iz člena 29 v okoliščinah, ki jih zadevajo, preden sprejmejo sklep o nedopustnosti prošnje.
Member States shall allow applicants to present their views with regard to the application of the grounds referred to in Article 29 in their particular circumstances before a decision to consider an application inadmissible is taken.
Zato države članice opravijo osebni razgovor o dopustnosti prošnje.
To that end, Member States shall conduct a personal interview on the admissibility of the application.
Države članice lahko predvidijo izjemo le v skladu s členom 36 za naknadne prošnje.
Member States may make an exception only in accordance with Article 36 in cases of subsequent applications.
Zato organ za presojo opravi osebni razgovor o dopustnosti prošnje.
To that end, the determining authority shall conduct a personal interview on the admissibility of the application.
Države članice poskrbijo, da uradnik organa za presojo, ki bo opravil razgovor o dopustnosti prošnje, ne nosi uniforme.
Member States shall ensure that the member of staff of the determining authority who conducts the interview on the admissibility of the application does not wear a uniform.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti mora predpis o prepovedi nošenja uniforme, ki velja za osebje, ki opravlja razgovor o vsebini prošnje, upoštevati tudi osebje, ki opravlja razgovor o dopustnosti prošnje.
In the interests of consistency, a requirement similar to that prohibiting the wearing of a uniform by the staff conducting an interview on the substance of an application should also apply to staff conducting an interview on the admissibility of an application.
Nošenje uniforme bi namreč lahko zmedlo prosilca glede tega, kaj točno je vloga njegovega sogovornika, in bi ogrozilo zaupnost in nepristranskost, ki sta bistveni za uspešen potek razgovora.
The wearing of a uniform may generate confusion on the part of the applicant as to the exact function of the interviewer and undermine the sense of confidentiality and impartiality which is vital if the interview is to proceed smoothly.
Člen 31 – odstavek 1 – točka b
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) sicer v tej državi uživa zadostno zaščito, vključno z načelom nevračanja,
(b) he/she otherwise enjoys sufficient protection in that country, including benefiting from the principle of non-refoulement;
(b) sicer v tej državi uživa dejansko zaščito, vključno z načelom nevračanja,
(b) he/she otherwise enjoys effective protection in that country, including benefiting from the principle of non-refoulement;