natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
H. ker previdnostno načelo, določeno v členu 174(2) Pogodbe o ES, zahteva, da vse interesne skupine opravijo vse potrebno za presojo vpliva novih odločitev ali začetka del na okolje ter sprejmejo ustrezne preventivne ukrepe, ker obstaja razumna verjetnost ogrožanja okolja,
H. whereas the precautionary principle laid down in Article 174(2) of the EC Treaty requires all stakeholders to make the necessary efforts to assess the environmental impact that new decisions or the commencement of works may have and to take appropriate preventive action where there is a reasonable likelihood of a threat to the environment,
I. ker je treba – v skladu z načelom, da se zahteve glede varstva okolja vključijo v sektorske politike – take zahteve ustrezno upoštevati pri izvajanju vseh dejavnosti Skupnosti in pri izpolnjevanju vseh njenih ciljev,
I. whereas, in accordance with the principle that environmental protection requirements must be integrated into sector-specific policies, due account should be taken of such requirements in the conduct of all Community activities and the pursuit of all Community goals,
J. ker člen 194 prihodnje Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, kot je bil vstavljen z lizbonsko pogodbo, izrecno navaja, da je treba energetsko politiko EU izvajati v duhu solidarnosti med državami članicami ter ob upoštevanju potrebe po ohranitvi in izboljšanju okolja,
J. whereas Article 194 of the future Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as inserted by the Lisbon Treaty, explicitly states that EU energy policy should be conducted in a spirit of solidarity between Member States and with regard to the need to preserve and improve the environment,
K. ker je Mednarodna pomorska organizacija potrdila posebno ranljivost Baltiškega morja na okoljske nevarnosti in ga priznala kot „zelo ranljivo območje“,
K. whereas the particular vulnerability of the Baltic Sea to environmental threats has been confirmed by the International Maritime Organization, which has recognised it as an ‘extremely vulnerable area’,
L. ker je Baltiško morje danes eno od najbolj onesnaženih morskih območij na svetu ter ker je zlasti koncentracija nevarnih snovi v vodi in živih organizmih še vedno nenaravno visoka,
L. whereas the Baltic Sea is today one of the world’s most polluted maritime areas and whereas, in particular, the concentration of hazardous substances both in its waters and in its living organisms remains unnaturally high,
M. ker je Baltiško morje značilno celinsko morje in plitvo morsko območje ter ima, skupaj s Črnim morjem, najdaljši krog izmenjave vode s svetovnim oceanom, ki je približno 30 let,
M. whereas the Baltic Sea is a typical inland sea as well as a shallow sea area and, together with the Black Sea, has the longest cycle of water exchange with the global ocean, at approximately 30 years,
N. ker je življenjska doba plinovodov ocenjena na petdeset let, za razgradnjo plinovodnega sistema pa bo potrebno skoraj toliko dela kot za njegovo postavitev; ker je pri obravnavi vpliva tega projekta na okolje in gospodarstvo ta vidik treba presoditi glede na čas, ki je potreben za popolno vzpostavitev prvotnega stanja, kar zadeva živalstvo in rastlinstvo,
N. whereas the lifetime of the gas transmission pipeline is estimated at 50 years and the magnitude of the work involved in decommissioning the pipeline system will be similar in scale to that of the planned installation; whereas this aspect should be weighed against the time needed for the complete restoration of flora and fauna to their original state when considering the environmental and economic impact of the project,
O. ker izpostavljenost težkim kovinam, onesnaževalcem in drugim škodljivim snovem povzroča tveganje za zdravje in vpliva na prehrambeno verigo, kar je treba preučiti,
O. whereas exposure to heavy metals, contaminants and other harmful substances entails health risks and food-chain implications that need to be examined,
P. ker je Baltiško morje zaradi številnih dejavnikov, vključno z dolgimi obdobji zadrževanja vode, stratificiranim vodnim stolpom, industrializiranim povodjem in predvsem s krepitvijo kmetijstva na območju Baltiškega morja, še posebej okoljsko ranljivo,
P. whereas a number of factors, including long water retention times, the stratified water column, the extensive, industrialised catchment area and the particular intensification of farming in the Baltic Sea area, make the Baltic Sea especially environmentally vulnerable,
Q. ker bo izvajanje del pri posebnih pogojih v Baltiškem morju povzročilo nenadno povečanje populacije alg, kar bo ogrozilo zlasti Finsko, Švedsko in Nemčijo,
Q. whereas the performance of works under the special conditions obtaining in the Baltic Sea will result in a sudden increase in the algae population, posing a particular risk to Finland, Sweden and Germany,
R. ker je približno 80.000 ton streliva, ki je bilo odvrženo po drugi svetovni vojni na morsko dno Baltiškega morja in vsebuje strupene snovi, kot so iperit, žveplov iperit, dušikov iperit, luzit, Clark I, Clark II in adamzit, dodaten, pomemben dejavnik tveganja za okolje, saj predstavlja nevarnost za morsko okolje Baltiškega morja ter življenje in zdravje človeka,
R. whereas a further significant environmental risk factor is the existence of approximately 80 000 tonnes of munitions dumped on the Baltic seabed after World War II, containing toxic substances such as mustard gas, sulphur yperite, nitrogen yperite, lewisite, Clark I, Clark II and adamsite, which represent a hazard both to the Baltic marine environment and to human life and health,
S. ker je več držav od leta 1945 do poznih šestdesetih let še naprej odlagalo zabojnike s strelivom v morje,
S. whereas munitions containers continued to be dumped by a number of states from 1945 until the late sixties,
T. ker so poleg tega zabojniki s strelivom v kritičnem stanju in ker je bila njihova korozija ocenjena na 80 %, njihove točne lokacije pa ni vedno mogoče ugotoviti,
T. whereas, moreover, the munitions containers are in a critical condition, their corrosion having been estimated at 80%, and whereas their exact location cannot always be determined,
U. ker akcijski načrt za Baltsko morje, sprejet 15. novembra 2007 v Krakovu, zahteva, da države, ki mejijo na Baltik, zagotovijo varno skladiščenje starih zalog kemikalij in naprav, ki vsebujejo nevarne snovi,
U. whereas, at the same time, the Baltic Sea Action Plan adopted on 15 November 2007 in Krakow requires states bordering on the Baltic to ensure safe storage of old stocks of chemicals and devices containing hazardous substances,
V. ob upoštevanju možnega vpliva plinovoda na morsko okolje Baltiškega morja in države, ki mejijo na Baltik,
V. taking account of the potential impact of the gas pipeline on the Baltic marine environment and on states bordering on the Baltic,
W. ob upoštevanju povečanega prometa v smislu potniških ladij in naftnih tankerjev v Baltiškem morju ter morebitne nevarnosti požara in tveganja izgube plovnosti in potopa plovil zaradi okvare plinovoda v fazi izgradnje, namestitve in delovanja ter možnih vplivov na ljudi, gospodarstvo in okolje,
W. having regard to the increased traffic in terms of seafarers and oil tankers in the Baltic Sea and the potential fire hazard, the risk of loss of buoyancy and sinking of vessels resulting from a breakdown of the gas pipeline during its construction, installation and operation, and the potential human, economic and environmental impact thereof,
X. ker bo izgradnja severnoevropskega plinovoda povzročila tehnogen vpliv na podmorski pas v dolžini 1.200 km in v širini približno 2 km, na površini 2.400 km2; to bo največja podmorska struktura na svetu,
X. whereas the construction of the North European Gas Pipeline will result in a technogenic impact on an undersea lane 1 200 km long and approximately 2 km wide, with an area of 2 400 km², which will thus become the largest undersea construction site in the world,
Y. ker bodo izgradnja, namestitev in delovanje projekta negativno vplivali na ribištvo, turizem in pomorstvo, kar bo občutno ogrozilo gospodarstvo obalnih regij,
Y. whereas fishing, tourism and shipping will be adversely affected by the construction, installation and operation of the project, resulting in a substantial threat to the economy of coastal regions,
Z. ker člen 123 Konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem pravu, ki je sestavni del pravnega reda Evropskih skupnosti, zahteva od držav, ki mejijo na polzaprta morja, da med seboj sodelujejo pri uveljavljanju svojih pravic in opravljanju svojih dolžnosti ter usklajujejo izvajanje pravic in dolžnosti ob upoštevanju varstva in ohranjanja morskega okolja,
Z. whereas Article 123 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which forms an integral part of the acquis communautaire , requires states bordering semi-enclosed seas to cooperate with each other in the exercise of their rights and in the performance of their duties and to coordinate the implementation of their rights and duties with respect to the protection and preservation of the marine environment,
AA. ker člen 2(1) konvencije iz Espooja zahteva, da njene pogodbenice na podlagi predlaganih dejavnosti posamezno ali skupaj sprejmejo vse ustrezne in učinkovite ukrepe za preprečitev, zmanjšanje in nadzor bistvenih škodljivih čezmejnih okoljskih vplivov,
AA. whereas Article 2(1) of the Espoo Convention requires the parties thereto, either individually or jointly, to take all appropriate and effective measures to prevent, reduce and control significant adverse transboundary environmental impact from proposed activities,
AB. ker se lahko v skladu s členom 5(a) konvencije iz Espooja pri posvetovanju s pogodbenicami, ki so izpostavljene škodljivim vplivom čezmejnih projektov, obravnavajo nadomestne možnosti za predlagan projekt, vključno z njegovo opustitvijo,
AB. whereas under Article 5(a) of the Espoo Convention consultations with parties exposed to the harmful effects of transboundary projects may cover possible alternatives to a proposed project, including its abandonment,
AC. ker člen 12 helsinške konvencije zahteva, da njene pogodbenice sprejmejo vse ukrepe za preprečitev onesnaževanja morskega okolja območja Baltiškega morja, ki so posledica raziskovanja ali izkoriščanja morskega dna ali s tem povezanih dejavnosti,
AC. whereas Article 12 of the Helsinki Convention requires the parties thereto to take all measures in order to prevent pollution of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area resulting from exploration or exploitation of the seabed or from any associated activities,
AD. ker bo predlagana smer severnoevropskega plinovoda prečkala območja, ki so vključena v program NATURA 2000 in jih direktiva 92/43/EGS opredeljuje kot posebna ohranitvena območja,
AD. whereas the proposed route of the North European gas pipeline will traverse areas which are included in the Natura 2000 programme and which Directive 92/43/EEC classifies as special areas of conservation,
AE. ker člen 6(2) direktive 92/43/EGS zahteva, da države članice storijo vse potrebno, da na posebnih ohranitvenih območjih preprečijo slabšanje stanja naravnih habitatov in habitatov vrst,
AE. whereas Article 6(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC requires Member States to take appropriate steps to avoid the deterioration of natural habitats and the habitats of species in special areas of conservation,
AF. ker člen6(3) direktive 92/43/EGS zahteva, da države članice izvedejo ustrezno presojo vpliva vsakega načrta ali projekta, ki ni neposredno povezan z upravljanjem območja ali zanj potreben, vendar bi lahko nanj pomembno vplival glede na cilje za njegovo ohranitev,
AF. whereas Article 6(3) of Directive 92/43/EEC requires Member States to undertake an appropriate assessment of the implications of any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary for the management of a conservation site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, in view of the site’s conservation objectives,
AG. ker se v skladu s členom 6(3) direktive 92/43/EGS pristojni nacionalni organi strinjajo z načrtom ali projektom le glede na ugotovitve navedene presoje in po tem, ko se prepričajo, da ta ne bo škodoval celovitosti zadevnega območja, in, če je primerno, ko pridobijo mnenje javnosti,
AG. whereas under Article 6(3) of Directive 92/43/EEC, in the light of the conclusions of the above assessment the competent national authorities shall agree to the plan or project only after having ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned and, if appropriate, after having obtained the opinion of the general public,
AH. ker bi bil predlagani plinovod najdaljši dvojni podmorski plinovod na svetu in tudi zelo plitvo zakopan, zaradi česar bi bil še posebej izpostavljen morebitnim poškodbam,
AH. whereas the proposed gas pipeline would be the longest dual subsea gas pipeline in the world, as well as the shallowest one, which makes it especially vulnerable to potential damage,
AI. ker odločba 1364/2006/ES uvršča severnoevropski plinovod med prednostne projekte evropskega interesa,
AI. whereas Decision 1364/2006/EC includes the North European gas pipeline among priority projects of European interest,
AJ. ker je treba vsako večjo gradbeno strukturo v morju zaradi z njo povezanih tveganj posebej temeljito in izčrpno analizirati ter podati presojo vpliva na okolje, ki mora za pridobitev zanesljivih rezultatov zajemati vsaj eno rastno sezono v celoti, kar bi v primeru nekaterih vrst trajalo dve leti, to pa močno presega obdobje polletne študije, ki jo predlaga vlagatelj,
AJ. whereas every large-scale engineering structure erected in sea waters must, due to the associated risks, be subject to a particularly thorough and comprehensive analysis and environmental impact assessment which, if it is to produce reliable results, must cover at least one full growing season which in the case of some species could be as long as two years – a much longer period than the six-month study period proposed by the investor,
AK. ker bi bilo treba v skladu s konvencijo iz Espooja pred vsakim tovrstnim projektom opraviti analizo nadomestnih možnosti, vključno s stroški izvajanja in varstvom okolja, v tem primeru pa analizo kopenskih poti za plinovod,
AK. whereas, pursuant to the Espoo Convention, every project of this kind should be preceded by an analysis of its alternatives, covering in particular implementation costs and environmental safety, in this case an analysis of overland routes for the gas pipeline,
AL. ker člen 1 aarhuške konvencije zahteva, da vsaka njena pogodbenica zagotavlja pravico do dostopa do informacij, do udeležbe javnosti pri odločanju in do dostopa do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah,
AL. whereas Article 1 of the Aarhus Convention requires each party thereto to guarantee the rights of access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters,
AM. ker se je treba zavedati pravnih zahtev v zvezi s pripravo točne presoje vpliva na okolje, pri čemer se upoštevajo vsa navedena tveganja,
AM. whereas the legal requirements relating to the preparation of an accurate environmental impact assessment must be borne in mind and must take into account all the above hazards,
AN. ker je treba analizirati tudi teroristične grožnje in zmožnost za učinkovito preprečevanje,
AN. whereas, furthermore, it is necessary to analyse the terrorist threat and the capability for effective counteraction,
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0413 . ; poudarja, da odločba 1364/2006/ES (ki vključuje smernice TENE-E) priznava, da je Severni tok projekt evropskega interesa, ki bi pomagal pokrivati prihodnje potrebe EU po energij; poudarja, da je treba ta projekt, skupaj z drugimi dopolnilnimi plinovodi, kot sta Yamal II in Amber, načrtovati v duhu skupne evropske zunanje energetske politike ter pri tem v celoti upoštevati njihov vpliv na okolje in na varnost držav članic EU;
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0413 . ; underlines that Decision 1364/2006/EC (incorporating the TEN-E guidelines) recognises Nord Stream to be a project of European interest that would help to meet the EU’s future energy needs; stresses that this project, together with other complementary pipelines, such as the Yamal II and Amber, should be planned in the spirit of a common European foreign policy on energy and should take fully into account their impact on the environment and on the security of the EU Member States;
3. podpira predlog iz predhodno navedene resolucije Parlamenta z dne 14. novembra 2006, da mora prihodnja morska strategija EU prinesti zavezujoče nadnacionalne obveznosti, ki lahko vključujejo skupne zaveze v tretjih državah;
Supports the proposal, contained in Parliament’s above-mentioned resolution of 14 November 2006, that the EU’s future marine strategy must result in binding supranational obligations which may involve common commitments in third countries;
5. obžaluje obrobno vlogo EU pri tem projektu, zlasti vlogo Komisije; poudarja, da bi večje vključevanje EU zmanjšalo negotovost veliko držav članic v zvezi s projektom plinovoda Severni tok;
Regrets the marginal role played by the EU in this project, in particular that of the Commission; points out that greater EU involvement would reduce the uncertainty felt by many Member States about the Nord Stream project;
10. poudarja, da dolgoročna trajnostna rešitev zahteva polno preglednost za vse strani v fazah gradnje in obratovanja ter da se bo zaupanje v ta pomemben projekt povečalo, če bodo lahko države ob Baltiškem morju spremljale delo;
Emphasises that a long-term sustainable solution requires full transparency for all parties during both the construction and operating phases, and that confidence in this major project will be increased if the states bordering the Baltic Sea can monitor the work;
12. zato poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj si intenzivno prizadevata za analizo vpliva gradnje severnoevropskega plinovoda na okolje, zlasti v primerih, ki vključujejo ugotovitve, za katere je potrebno mnenje Komisije, kot določa člen 6(4) direktive 92/43/EGS;
Calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Council to make a full commitment to analysing the environmental impact of the construction of the North European gas pipeline, particularly in situations involving considerations which require a Commission opinion, as specified in Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC;
17. poudarja, da so zaradi dela na območju do 2.400 km2, ki bo trajalo več mesecev in za katerega je potrebnih veliko plovil in druge opreme, resno ogroženi biotska raznovrstnost in številni habitati ter varnost in nemoteno delovanje ladijskega prometa v regiji;
Points out that dozens of months' work in an area of up to 2 400 km², requiring the use of a large number of vessels and other equipment, represents a serious threat to biodiversity and to the number of habitats, as well as to the safety and smooth operation of shipping, in the region;
21. poziva projektanta, naj zagotovi, da izgradnja in delovanje plinovoda ne bosta ogrozila številnih vrst rib in ptic ter obstoja populacije 600 pliskavk, ki so edinstvene vrste tega geografskega območja;
Calls on the developer to ensure that the construction and operation of the pipeline does not endanger the many species of fish and birds as well as the existence of a population of porpoises numbering only 600, which are a species unique to this geographical region;
24. poudarja, da ni strategije, ki bi obravnavala strukturne pomanjkljivosti in zunanje grožnje varnosti plinovoda; poudarja, da je treba jasno opredeliti vse vidike varnosti in ukrepanja za primer nesreče, vključno s finančnimi viri, akterji, odgovornostmi in postopki;
Points out the absence of any strategy to address structural failure and external threats to the security of the pipeline; emphasises the need to clearly define all aspects related to security and emergency response, including financial resources, actors, roles and procedures;
26. poudarja, da mora biti vprašanje gospodarskega nadomestila za kakršne koli napake ali škodo popolnoma razjasnjeno, preden se sploh lahko začne z delom; poudarja, da lahko večja napaka na plinovodu povzroči težave za države, ki mejijo na Baltik. meni, da mora družba Nord Stream v celoti prevzeti odgovornost za nadomestilo;
Stresses that the issue of economic compensation for any failures or damage must be perfectly clear before work can even begin; points out that a major failure in the pipeline can lead to complications for the states bordering the Baltic Sea and would be devastating for the marine environment; considers that Nord Stream should assume full liability for compensation;
– odločitev švedske vlade z dne 12. februarja 2008, s katero so zavrnili podelitev dovoljenja družbi Nord Steam za izgradnjo plinovoda zaradi znatnih postopkovnih in vsebinskih pomanjkljivosti, zlasti ker ni predložila nobene študije o nadomestnih poteh ali možnosti opustitve izgradnje plinovoda;
– the Swedish Government’s decision of 12 February 2008 refusing to grant Nord Stream permission to build the gas pipeline due to significant procedural and substantive shortcomings and in particular the lack of an analysis of an alternative route and of the option of abandoning the construction of the pipeline;
– stališče litovskega parlamenta z dne 27. marca 2007, v katerem je poudaril, da je treba odložiti izvajanje obsežnih infrastrukturnih projektov v Baltiškem morju, dokler ne bo izvedena podrobna analiza nadomestnih rešitev skupaj s samostojnimi in obsežnimi presojami vplivov na okolje;
– the position of the Lithuanian Parliament of 27 March 2007 pointing to the need to suspend the implementation of large-scale infrastructure projects in the Baltic Sea pending an in-depth analysis of alternative solutions together with independent and comprehensive environmental impact assessments;
– odločitev estonske vlade z dne 21. septembra 2007, da ne bo dala dovoljenja za podvodne študije v estonski izključni ekonomski coni, zaradi dvomov o področju njihove uporabe in obsegu;
– the Estonian Government's decision of 21 September 2007 not to grant permission for underwater studies to be conducted in Estonia's exclusive economic zone, owing to doubts about the scope and scale of those studies;
33. poudarja pomen priprave pregledne komunikacijske strategije o ukrepih glede rezultatov presoje vplivov na okolje in pomena dejavnega sporočanja teh rezultatov vsem državam članicam EU, zlasti baltskim obalnim državam;
Points out the importance of conducting a transparent communication strategy on steps concerning the results of the environmental impact assessment, and of communicating those results actively to all EU Member States, especially the Baltic littoral states;
35. meni, da mora smer severnoevropskega plinovoda izpolnjevati strateške in gospodarske cilje iz odločbe 1364/2006/ES, pri čemer se prepreči velika okoljska škoda;
Notes that routing the North European gas pipeline should meet the strategic and economic objectives set out in Decision 1364/2006/EC whilst avoiding extensive environmental damage;
38. poziva zlasti Komisijo, naj sprejme odločne ukrepe v skladu z načelom dobrega upravljanja, na podlagi katerega morajo organ odločanja z obširnimi pooblastili izvesti pravočasne analize dejanskega stanja zadev in po potrebi pridobiti izvedensko mnenje za preprečitev sprejetja samovoljne odločitve;
Calls on the Commission in particular to take resolute action in line with the principle of good governance, which recognises that decision-making bodies enjoying a wide discretion are required to carry out a timely analysis of the actual state of affairs and, where necessary, to obtain expert opinion to prevent an arbitrary decision from being made;
40. predlaga uvedbo sistema za skupni nadzor nad plinovodom, ki bo vključeval vse države v regiji Baltiškega morja; poleg tega predlaga, da je za plačilo nadomestila za okoljsko škodo odgovorna izključno družba Nord Stream;
Suggests the establishment of a system of common supervision of the pipeline, to include all countries in the Baltic Sea region; further suggests that the obligation to pay compensation for environmental damage should lie solely with Nord Stream;