natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija v poročilu navede tudi predloge za uskladitev opreme za nadzor na podlagi meril Skupnosti in uskladitev nadzornih postopkov na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu.
In the same report the Commission shall put forward proposals to harmonise checking equipment on the basis of Community criteria and road safety checking procedures.
Nadalje Komisija v poročilu oceni, v kolikšni meri so države članice prostovoljno sledile smernicam iz člena 2a, in preuči, ali naj ta priporočila postanejo obvezna.
In the report the Commission shall further assess how the Member States have, on a voluntary basis, implemented the guidelines referred to in Article 2a and shall consider whether those recommendations should be made mandatory.
Komisija po potrebi predloži predlog za spremembo direktive.
If necessary, the Commission may submit a proposal amending this Directive.
Komisija dve leti po začetku veljavnosti direktive predloži poročilo o tem, kako države članice izvajajo direktivo in kakšen je njen uspeh pri zniževanju števila smrtnih žrtev na cestah po EU.
Two years after the directive has entered into force, the Commission should submit a report on its implementation and its effectiveness in terms of the goal of reducing the number of fatalities on the EU’s roads.
V poročilu bi moral biti prav tako obravnavan uspeh direktive ob dejstvu, da je osebo, ki je storila prekršek in ki ni imetnik potrdila o registraciji, težko identificirati.
One specific point that the report should address is the implications for the effectiveness of the directive entailed in the fact that the person driving at the time of an offence can be difficult to identify when he or she is not the holder the registration certificate.
Priloga –stran 2 – pododstavek 6
Annex – page 2 – subparagraph 6
Če ne plačate te denarne kazni, morate izpolniti priloženi obrazec za odgovor (stran 4) in ga poslati na navedeni naslov.
If you do not pay this financial penalty, you are obliged to complete the attached reply form (page 4) and send it to the address shown.
Ta obrazec za odgovor lahko pošlje [pristojni organ države prekrška] [pristojnemu organu države registracije] za izvršbo odločbe o sankciji.
This reply form may be transmitted by [the competent authority of the State of offence] to [the competent authority of the State of residence] for implementation of the sanction decision.
Prilogo je treba spremeniti, da se imetnika potrdila o registraciji seznani s tem, da se o njegovi zavrnitvi plačila lahko obvesti organe države registracije za boljše obravnavanje kršitev in odločb o sankcijah.
The annex must be amended so that it informs the holder of the offence certificate that his or her payment refusal may be transmitted to the authorities of his State of residence in order to allow a better follow-up of offences and sanction decisions.
Priloga – stran 2 – pododstavek 6 a (novo)
Annex – page 2 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
Primer bo obravnaval pristojni organ države, v kateri je bil storjen prekršek.
This case will be examined by the competent authority in the State where the offence has been committed.
Če postopek ne bo sprožen, boste o tem obveščeni v 60 dneh po prejemu obrazca za odgovor.
If this case is not pursued, you will be informed within 60 days from receipt of the reply form.
Če bo postopek sprožen, bo potekal na sledeč način:
If this case is pursued, the following procedure applies:
[Izpolni država prekrška: kakšen bo potek postopka, vključno s podrobnostmi o možnostih in postopku pritožbe zoper odločitev o pregonu tega primera.
[to be filled in by the State of offence - what the further procedure will be, including details of the possibility and procedure of appeal against the decision to pursue the case.
Podrobnosti v vsakem primeru vključujejo naslednje: naziv in naslov organa, pristojnega za pregon primera; rok za plačilo; naziv in naslov pristojnega pritožbenega organa; rok za pritožbo.]
These details shall in any event include: Name and address of the authority in charge of pursuing the case; deadline for payment; name and address of the relevant appeal body; deadline for appeal].
Enaka obrazložitev kot v prejšnjem predlogu spremembe.
The information on the holder’s rights must be placed at the beginning of the offence notification in order to provide better information.
Priloga – stran 4 – zadnji pododstavek
Annex – page 4 – last subparagraph
Ta primer bo obravnaval pristojni organ države, v kateri je bil storjen prekršek.
This case will be examined by the competent authority in the State where the offence has been committed.
Če primer ne bo preganjan, boste o tem obveščeni v 60 dneh po prejemu obrazca za odgovor.
If this case is not pursued, you will be informed within 60 days after receipt of the reply form.
Če bo primer preganjan, bo uporabljen naslednji postopek:
If this case is pursued, the following procedure applies:
[izpolni država prekrška – kakšen bo potek postopka, vključno s podrobnostmi o možnostih in postopku pritožbe zoper odločitev o pregonu tega primera.
[to be filled in by the State of offence - what the further procedure will be, including details of the possibility and procedure of appeal against the decision to pursue the case.
Te podrobnosti v vsakem primeru vključujejo naslednje: naziv in naslov organa, pristojnega za pregon tega primera; rok za plačilo; naziv in naslov zadevnega pritožbenega organa; pritožbeni rok].
These details shall in any event include: Name and address of the authority in charge of pursuing the case; deadline for payment; name and address of the body of appeal concerned; deadline for appeal].
Priloga - obrazec obvestila o prekršku - stran 4
Annex - form for the offence notification - page 4
Obrazec za odgovor
Reply form
(izpolnite z velikimi tiskanimi črkami in ustrezno označite)
(please complete using block capitals and mark the applicable option)
Ste vi vozili vozilo v času storitve prekrška? (da/ne)
Were you the driver of the vehicle at the time of the commission of the offence (yes/no)
Če da, prosimo izpolnite naslednje:
If yes, please complete the following:
– Priimek in ime:
- Name and first name:
– Kraj in datum rojstva:
- Place and date of birth:
– Številka vozniškega dovoljenja: ... izdanega
- Number of driving licence:...delivered
Ali lahko navedete identiteto voznika, če niste vi vozili vozila v času storitve prekrška? (da/ne)
If you were not the driver of the vehicle at the time of the commission of the offence, are you able to indicate the identity of the driver (yes/no)
Če da, prosimo izpolnite naslednje podatke o vozniku:
If yes, please complete the following in respect of the driver :
(1) Ali je vozilo znamke … z registrsko številko … registrirano na vaše ime?
(1) Is the vehicle, make... registration number...registered in your name?
Če ni, navedite imetnika potrdila o registraciji:
If not, the holder of the registration certificate is:
(2) Ali se strinjate, da ste storili prometni prekršek?
(2) Do you acknowledge that you committed the offence?
(3) Če se ne strinjate, navedite razloge zakaj:
(3) If you do not acknowledge this, please explain why:
(3) Če se ne strinjate, med drugim na primer, če niste želeli navesti identitete voznika, navedite razloge zakaj:
(3) If you do not acknowledge this, including refusing to reveal the identity of the driver, please explain why:
Izpolnjeni obrazec v 60 dneh po datumu tega obvestila pošljite na naslednji organ:
Please send the completed form within 60 days from the date of this notification to the following authority:
na naslednji naslov:
at the following address
Predlogi sprememb se morajo upoštevati v obrazcu.
The amendments proposed in the text must be reflected in the form.
Nov pravni instrument za zmanjšanje števila smrtnih žrtev na cestah do leta 2010 za polovico
A new legal instrument to reduce by 50% the number of persons killed on European roads by 2010
V letu objave bele knjige je bilo število smrtnih žrtev v 25 državah članicah 54 000
When the White Paper was issued in a Europe of 25 Member States, the number of road traffic fatalities was 54 000
Vir: CARE (zbirka podatkov Skupnosti o prometnih nesrečah) ali nacionalne objave. .
Source: Care (EU database on road accidents) or national publications. .
Od takrat je bil dosežen velik napredek, saj je bilo ugotovljeno zmanjšanje tega števila.
Since then significant progress has been made, and there has been a general downward trend in road deaths.
Napredek je bil viden predvsem v prvi polovici desetletja.
However, this progress took place mostly during the first half of the decade.
Od leta 2005 naprej je bilo namreč mogoče opaziti, da se število žrtev znižuje počasneje.
Since 2005 the reduction in the number of road deaths has been slowing down.
Leta 2007 je na cestah po Evropski uniji umrlo več kot 40 000 oseb, kar pomeni, da se je v celotnem obdobju število smrtnih žrtev na cestah zmanjšalo za 20 %.
In 2007 over 40 000 people were killed in the European Union: this represents a fall in the number of road deaths by some 20% over the entire period.
Glede na cilj, ki je bil zastavljen za leto 2010, rezultat ni zadovoljiv, saj bi se moralo v tem obdobju število smrtnih žrtev zmanjšati za 37 %.
This result falls far short of the target fixed for 2010 which required a reduction of 37% over the same period.
Rezultati pa so bili še slabši leta 2007, ko se število smrtnih žrtev sploh ni zmanjšalo.
Even more seriously, the number of road traffic deaths did not fall in 2007.
V istem obdobju so študije, ki jih je izvedla Evropska komisija, pokazale, da je delež nerezidentov, ki so storilci prometnih prekrškov, večji kot delež rezidentov, zlasti na področju prekoračitev dovoljene hitrosti.
Over the same period, studies commissioned by the Commission show that non-residents account for a disproportionately high number of road traffic accidents, particularly as regards speeding.
Pojav je delno povezan s povečano mobilnostjo v Evropski uniji in odpravo meja med državami članicami.
This phenomenon is partly linked to increased mobility within the European Union and the opening of borders between Member States.
Vendar se prekrškov, storjenih na ozemlju držav članic, kjer voznik nima stalnega prebivališča, najpogosteje ne kaznuje.
However, sanctions imposed for offences committed on the territory of Member States other than the driver's country of residence are most frequently not enforced.
To so zlasti prekrški, ki se odkrijejo z avtomatskimi merilniki hitrosti, katerih število se je povečalo z množičnim nameščanjem avtomatskih radarskih naprav na evropske ceste.
This is particularly the case for automatically recorded offences, which have greatly increased with the widespread installation of automatic radar systems on European roads.
Ta sorazmerna nekaznovanost ogroža cilje glede varnosti v cestnem prometu, saj voznike navaja h kršenju nacionalnih prometnih predpisov zaradi občutka, da ne bodo kaznovani.
This relative impunity undermines the objectives of road safety and encourages drivers not to respect road traffic rules in other Member States because they feel that sanctions will not be enforced.
Nekaznovanost zmanjšuje tudi legitimnost nadzora v očeh evropskih državljanov, ki bi lahko podvomili v njegovo ustreznost glede na to, da je treba rezidente in nerezidente obravnavati enako.
But it also undermines the legitimacy of these controls in the eyes of European citizens generally who could call them into question, arguing that residents and non-residents must be treated equally.
Cilj predloga torej je, da se ta dvojna težava odpravi po več pobudah Komisije, kot je priporočilo z dne 6. aprila 2004 o izvajanju predpisov s področja varnosti v cestnem prometu(2004/345/ES).
The objective of the proposal under review is therefore to address these two concerns, coming, as it does, in the wake of a number of initiatives launched by the Commission, such as the recommendation of 6 April 2004 on enforcement in the field of road safety (2004/345/CE).
Evropski parlament je prek članov Odbora za promet in turizem večkrat zahteval, da se pripravi zakonodaja na področju čezmejnega izvajanja sankcij v povezavi z varnostjo v cestnem prometu.
The European Parliament, through members of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, demanded on a number of occasions that legislation be introduced on the cross-border enforcement of sanctions linked to road safety.
Predlog direktive Komisije
The Commission's proposal for a directive
Komisija želi pospešiti izvajanje sankcij za voznike, ki so storili prekrške v zvezi s prekoračitvijo hitrosti, vožnjo pod vplivom alkohola, neuporabo varnostnega pasu ali vožnjo skozi rdečo luč v drugi državi članici.
The Commission seeks to facilitate the enforcement of penalties against drivers who have committed offences relating to speeding, drink-driving, a failure to wear a seatbelt or failure to stop at red lights in a Member State other than their own.
Komisija se je namerno odločila, da področje uporabe direktive omeji na štiri prekrške (člen 1), ki povzročajo največ nesreč s smrtnim izidom na cesti, kar je nov pristop na področju evropske politike varnosti v cestnem prometu.
The Commission deliberately chose to limit the scope of the Directive, which marks a new approach in European road safety policy - to the four offences (Article 1) which are responsible for most fatalities in the EU.
Tem prekrškom je skupno tudi to, da so kvalificirani kot prekrški v vseh 27 državah članicah Evropske unije.
Furthermore, they are all considered offences in the 27 EU Member States.
Cilj tega predloga je vzpostaviti postopek izmenjave informacij med državami članicami (člen 3) z omrežjem za izmenjavo elektronskih podatkov (člen 4), ki omogočajo identifikacijo vozila, ki je bilo udeleženo pri prekršku.
The proposal seeks to establish a procedure for exchanging information between Member States (Article 3) through an electronic data exchange network (Article 4) to identify a vehicle which has committed an offence.
Po identifikaciji uprava države, kjer je bil prekršek storjen, imetniku potrdila o registraciji (člen 5) pošlje obvestilo o prekršku, s katerim ga obvesti o podrobnostih prekrška, višini denarne kazni, ki jo mora plačati, postopkih plačila – ti postopki morajo čim bolj olajšati čezmejne bančne transakcije – in o pravnih sredstvih.
Following identification, an offence notification is sent by the relevant authority in the State of offence to the holder of the registration certificate of the vehicle concerned (Article 5) which describes the details of the offence, the amount of the financial penalty that the holder is required to pay, the payment procedures - these procedures must facilitate as far as possible crossborder banking transactions - and appeals procedures.
Nadaljnja obravnava sankcij pomeni drugo fazo obravnavanja prekrškov, ki je zagotovljena z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2005/214/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni.
As far as follow-up is concerned, this constitutes the second phase of the treatment of the penalty under Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of the Council on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties.
Poleg tega predlog direktiva predvideva zagotovila o varstvu osebnih podatkov (člen 7), pri čemer se sklicuje na direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov.
The proposal for a directive also provides personal data protection safeguards (Article 7), referring in this connection to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.
Predlog prav tako uvaja ukrepe komitologije (člen 8) v zvezi z opredelitvijo skupnih pravil za vzpostavitev električnega omrežja ali spremembo obrazca obvestila o prekršku.
Finally, the proposal introduces comitology measures (Article 8) concerning the drawing up of common rules for the establishment of the electronic network or the adjustment of the offence notification model.
Stališče poročevalca v zvezi s predlogom Komisije
The rapporteur's position on the Commission proposal
Soglašam s cilji Komisije glede varnosti v cestnem prometu in menim, da je to primeren pristop za zmanjšanje števila prekrškov na evropskih cestah.
Your rapporteur shares the Commission's objectives as regards road safety and takes the view that the approach adopted will indeed reduce the number of offences on European roads.
Zlasti podpiram prednostno nalogo Evropske komisije glede štirih prekrškov iz člena 1 predloga direktive, da se poudari prekrške v zvezi z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, ki povzročajo največ smrtnih žrtev.
She supports in particular the priority given by the Commission to the four offences referred to in Article 1 of the proposal for a directive, the purpose being to concentrate on those road safety offences that are responsible for most fatalities.
Vendar je za izboljšanje predloga ali odpravo pomanjkljivosti v njem treba obravnavati več točk.
However, a number of points should be addressed with a view to making improvements or overcoming certain shortcomings in the proposal.
1) V zvezi s prekrški bi želel opozoriti, da jih je treba v čim večji meri obravnavati na podlagi okvirnega sklepa 2005/214/PNZ.
1) The follow-up of offences : your rapporteur reiterates that this should take place, as far as possible, through Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA.
Vendar, da bi se upoštevale nacionalne pravne posebnosti na področju izvajanja sankcij za prometne prekrške, je bilo treba zagotoviti, da so poleg okvirnega sklepa na voljo tudi druga zagotovila za izvrševanje sankcij, kadar okvirnega sklepa ni mogoče uporabiti.
However, in order to take into account differences between national legislations as regard road traffic sanction decisions, your rapporteur would also like enforcement safeguards to be provided where the framework decision is not applicable.
Dejansko imajo nekatere države članice Evropske unije sistem sankcij, ki temelji na upravnih, ne na kazenskih prekrških.
For in some EU Member States sanctions are an administrative rather than criminal matter.
Da bi se te posebnosti upoštevale, sem predlagal dodatek, ki omogoča obravnavanje odločb o sankcijah in njihov prenos organom države registracije osebe, ki je storila prekršek.
In order to take into account these specific national features, your rapporteur has proposed an addition allowing the penalty decision to be transmitted to and followed up by the authorities of the State of residence of the person having committed the offence.
2) V zvezi s praksami nadzora varnosti v cestnem prometu si prizadevam za to, da bi države članice nadzor okrepile tako, da vzpostavijo minimalna merila, ki so primerljiva prek smernic.
2) Road safety control practices : your rapporteur would like Member States to strengthen these practices by establishing minimum comparable criteria by means of guidelines.
3) V zvezi z varstvom osebnih podatkov sem povzel določeno število pomislekov, ki jih je izrazil Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov v svojem poročilu z dne 8. maja 2008.
3) Personal data protection : your rapporteur has taken on board a number of concerns voiced by the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) in his opinion of 8 May 2008.
Predloženi predlogi tako omogočajo, da se upoštevajo tehnični ukrepi iz postopka komitologije o upravljanju elektronskega omrežja za izmenjavo podatkov ter se v direktivi in obvestilu o prekršku iz priloge zagotovi določeno število pravic iz direktive 95/45/ES.
The proposals that have been made will thus allow the technical measures taken in comitology on the management of the electronic data exchange network to be incorporated and safeguard a number of rights provided by Directive 95/45/EC to be enshrined in the body of the directive and in the offence notification contained in the Annex.
4) Obveščanje evropskih voznikov: Evropski vozniki morajo biti obveščeni o izvajanju direktive, zlasti pri prehodu iz ene države članice v drugo.
4) Informing European drivers : European drivers must be informed of the implementation of this directive, in particular when they cross from one Member State to another.
5) Poročilo in ocena direktive: Predlagam, da se v direktivo vključi določba o tem, da mora Evropska komisija dve leti po začetku veljavnosti direktive pripraviti poročilo o njenem izvajanju in o izkušnjah, pridobljenih po tej oceni.
5) Report and evaluation of the directive : your rapporteur proposes inserting in the directive an obligation for the Commission to report, two years after the entry into force of the directive, on its implementation and experience gathered following this evaluation.
Na podlagi tega poročila mora Komisija predložiti predloge o spremembi direktive, zlasti glede učinkovitosti njenega izvajanja, področja uporabe, nadzornih praks in standardizacije opreme za nadzor.
On the basis of this report, the Commission will be required to proposals for amending the directive, in particular as regards the effectiveness of implementation, its scope, the control practices and the standardisation of control equipment.
Pravila v predlogu so namenjena lažjemu izvajanju sankcij, predvidenih za prometne prekrške (ne glede na razvrstitev na kazniva dejanja ali upravne prekrške), pri katerih storilec ne more biti takoj identificiran, na primer, ker je bil prekršek ugotovljen z uporabo elektronskih naprav, ali pri katerih je storilec identificiran takoj, vendar je potrebna nadaljnja preiskava, kot v skladu s predlogom velja v primeru vožnje pod vplivom alkohola.
Rules set in the proposal are intended to facilitate the enforcement of sanctions provided for traffic offences (irrespective of their qualification as criminal or administrative offences) where the offender cannot be immediately identified, for instance because the offence was detected by means of electronic devices, or the offender is immediately identified but further investigation is required as, according to the proposal, it is the case for drink-driving.
Področje predloga je dokaj ozko in obsega štiri cestnoprometne prekrške: prekoračitev dovoljene hitrosti, vožnjo pod vplivom alkohola, neuporabo varnostnega pasu in vožnjo skozi rdečo luč.
The scope of the proposal is rather narrow and covers four road traffic offences, meaning: speeding, drink-driving, non-use of seat-belt and failing to stop at a red traffic light.
Predlog povzroča nekaj skrbi glede varstva temeljnih pravic.
The proposal raises some concern from the point of view of the protection of fundamental rights.
V zvezi s prekrškom vožnje pod vplivom alkohola je treba opozoriti, da po členu 2 (f) vožnja pod vplivom alkohola pomeni „vožnjo s koncentracijo alkohola v krvi, ki presega najvišjo koncentracijo, ki je dovoljena v državi prekrška“.
With regard to the offence of drink-driving, it must be noted that according to Article 2 (f) drink-driving means "driving with a blood alcohol level higher then the maximum level in force in the State of offence".
To pomeni, da predlog ne upošteva možnosti odkrivanja vožnje pod vplivom alkohola na način, ki ne vključuje odvzema vzorca krvi osumljencu, čeprav obstajajo manj nadležni načini za odkrivanje vožnje pod vplivom alkohola, kot je na primer merjenje alkohola v izdihanem zraku.
This means that, irrespective from the fact that there are other less intrusive ways to detect drink driving, such as the breathalyzer, the proposal does not take into consideration the option of detecting drink-driving in a way which does not imply taking a blood sample from the suspect.
To bi lahko močno posegalo v temeljne pravice, saj nobena od določb v direktivi ne opisuje, da nikomur ni treba dati vzorca krvi v ta namen in da bi bilo treba vožnjo pod vplivom alkohola vedno najprej odkrivati z merjenjem alkohola v izdihanem zraku.
This might deeply affect fundamental rights as far as no provision in the Directive clearly states that nobody can be obliged to provide a blood sample for this purpose and that drink-driving should in first instance always be detected by means of a breathalyzer.