natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pritožbene postopke morajo zagotoviti tako izvajalec (-ci) univerzalne storitve kot podjetja, ki zagotavljajo druge poštne storitve.
Complaining procedures should be made available both by universal service provider(s) and by undertakings providing other postal services.
ČLEN 1 TOČKA 16 Člen 19, odstavek 4 (Direktiva 97/67/EC)
ARTICLE 1 POINT 16 Article 19, paragraph 4 (Directive 97/67/EC)
Brez poseganja v druge možnosti pritožbe ali sredstva uveljavljanja odškodnin po nacionalni zakonodaji ali zakonodaji Skupnosti države članice zagotovijo uporabnikom, da lahko individualno ali, če to dovoljuje nacionalna zakonodaja, skupaj z organizacijami, ki zastopajo interese uporabnikov in/ali potrošnikov, primere, v katerih njihove pritožbe glede podjetij, ki nudijo storitve v okviru univerzalne storitve, niso bile zadovoljivo rešene, posredujejo v reševanje pristojnemu državnemu organu.
Without prejudice to other possibilities of appeal or means of redress under national and Community legislation, Member States shall ensure that users, acting individually or, where permitted by national law, jointly with organisations representing the interests of users and/or consumers, may bring before the competent national authority cases where users' complaints to undertakings providing services within the scope of the universal service have not been satisfactorily resolved.
Brez poseganja v druge možnosti pritožbe ali sredstva uveljavljanja odškodnin po nacionalni zakonodaji ali zakonodaji Skupnosti države članice zagotovijo uporabnikom, da lahko individualno ali, če to dovoljuje nacionalna zakonodaja, skupaj z organizacijami, ki zastopajo interese uporabnikov in/ali potrošnikov, primere, v katerih njihove pritožbe glede izvajalca (-ev) univerzalne storitve ali podjetij, ki nudijo storitve v okviru univerzalne storitve, niso bile zadovoljivo rešene, posredujejo v reševanje pristojnemu državnemu organu.
Without prejudice to other possibilities of appeal or means of redress under national and Community legislation, Member States shall ensure that users, acting individually or, where permitted by national law, jointly with organisations representing the interests of users and/or consumers, may bring before the competent national authority cases where users' complaints to universal service provider(s) or to undertakings providing services within the scope of the universal service have not been satisfactorily resolved.
Pritožbeni postopki ali druga pravna sredstva morajo biti dostopni, če pritožba na izvajalca (-e) univerzalne storitve ali podjetja, ki nudijo storitve v okviru univerzalne storitve, ni bila zadovoljivo rešena.
Appeal procedures or other means of redress must be available should a complaint to (a) universal service provider(s) or to undertakings providing services within the scope of the universal service have not been satisfactorily resolved.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 21 Člen 23 (Direktiva 97/67/EC)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 21 Article 23 (Directive 97/67/EC)
Brez poseganja v člen 7 vsaka tri leta in prvič najpozneje do 31. decembra 2011 Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o uporabi te direktive, vključno z ustreznimi podatki o razvoju v poštnem sektorju, še zlasti o gospodarskih, družbenih in zaposlitvenih vzorcih in o tehnoloških vidikih ter o kakovosti storitev.
Without prejudice to Article 7, every three years, on the first occasion no later than 31 December 2011, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive, including the appropriate information about developments in the sector, particularly concerning economic, social, employment patterns and technological aspects, as well as about quality of service.
Poročila iz tega člena ne posegajo v možnostno študijo in poročilo, ki ju mora v skladu s členom 7 pripraviti Komisija.
The reports in this article are without prejudice to the prospective study and the report to be prepared by the Commission, both provided for in Article 7.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 21 A (novo) Člen 23 a (novo) (Direktiva 97/67/ES)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 21 A (new) Article 23 a (new) (Directive 97/67/EC)
(21a) Vstavi se naslednji člen 23a:
(21a) The following Article 23a is inserted:
'Člen 23a
'Article 23a
Določbe te direktive ne posegajo v pristojnost držav članic v zvezi z delovnim pravom, vključno s katero koli pravno ali pogodbeno določbo, ki jo države članice uporabljajo skladno z nacionalno zakonodajo in zakonodajo Skupnosti in se nanaša na pogoje zaposlitve, delovne razmere, zdravje in varnost pri delu ter odnose med delodajalci in delavci.
The provisions of this Directive shall be without prejudice to Member States’ competence in relation to labour law, including any legal or contractual provision concerning employment conditions, working conditions, health and safety at work and the relationship between employers and workers, which Member States apply in accordance with national law in compliance with Community law.
Zato lahko države članice sprejmejo ukrepe za zagotavljanje dostojnih delovnih razmer v poštnem sektorju.'
Accordingly Member States may take measures to provide for decent working conditions in the postal sector.'
Ker so delovne razmere za zaposlene v poštnem sektorju pomembne, da se prepreči resno poslabšanje delovnih razmer je ustrezno poudariti, da ta direktiva ne ovira držav članic, da ne bi v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo dejavno urejale in ščitile delovne razmere, vključno z delovnimi razmerami za zaposlene v poštnem sektorju.
Given the importance of working conditions for those employed in the postal sector and the need to avoid a serious decrease in the working conditions, it is appropriate to underline that this Directive does not hinder Member States to actively regulate and safeguard the working conditions including those of the employees in the postal sector in accordance with their national legislation.
Poleg tega je treba pojasniti, da obveznost Komisije, da v poročilo iz člena 23 vključi družbene in zaposlitvene vzorce, ne ustvarja pristojnosti Skupnosti v tem sektorju.
It should also be clarified that the obligation of the Commission to include in its report under Article 23 social and employment patterns does not create a Community competence in this specific sector.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 22
ARTICLE 1, POINT 22
Člen 26 (Direktiva 97/67/EC)
Article 26 (Directive 97/67/EC)
(22) Člen 26 se črta.
(22) Article 26 is deleted.
Ker je bila brez poseganja v bolj liberalne ukrepe, ki so jih ohranile ali uvedle države članice v skladu s členom 26, obveznost dokončne liberalizacija preložena na poznejši datum, je primerno, da se ta člen ohrani.
Given that, without prejudice to more liberal measures maintained or introduced by Member States as provided for in Article 26, compulsory full liberalisation has been postponed to a later date, it is appropriate to maintain this Article.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 23 Člen 27 (Direktiva 97/67/EC)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 23 Article 27 (Directive 97/67/EC)
(23) Člen 27 se črta.
(23) Article 27 is deleted.
(23) Člen 27 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(23) Article 27 is replaced by the following:
„Člen 27
'Article 27
Določbe iz te direktive z izjemo člena 26 prenehajo veljati 31. decembra 2011, če ni v skladu s členom 7(3) sklenjeno drugače.
The provisions of this Directive, with the exception of Article 26, shall expire on 31 December 2011 unless otherwise decided in accordance with Article 7(3).
Na postopke za odobritev, opisane v členu 9, ta datum ne vpliva.“
The authorisation procedures described in Article 9 shall not be affected by this date.'
Novi datum zapadlosti predvideva časovni okvir, v katerem mora Komisija pripraviti možnostno študijo in naknadno poročilo, Evropski parlament in Svet pa sprejeti odločitev glede popolne liberalizacije poštnega sektorja, enako tisti v izvirni direktivi.
The new expiration date foresees a time-frame for the Commission to prepare the prospective study and the subsequent report and for the European Parliament and for the Council to take a decision on full liberalisation of the postal sector which is identical to that included in the original Directive.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 97/67/ES glede popolnega izoblikovanja notranjega trga poštnih storitev v Skupnosti
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 97/67/EC concerning the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services
Sedanje pravno stanje, po katerem za poštne storitve veljajo izključne in posebne pravice, je po mnenju številnih državljanov ter malih in srednje velikih podjetij ustrezno zagotovilo za kakovostne poštne storitve.
The present legal situation with exclusive and special rights in the postal services is for many citizens and SME´s an appropriate solution for postal services of high quality.
Če bomo storili še en korak v smeri liberalizacije, potem ga je treba narediti previdno, po temeljitih pripravah na nacionalni ravni in pod vodstvom Evropske komisije.
If another step in liberalisation is taken it must be taken with care and only after thorough preparation on the national level and under guidance by the EU-Commission.
Po mnenju poročevalca je treba standarde poštnih storitev ohraniti na sedanji ravni, brez sprememb, ki bi negativno vplivale na potrošnika.
In the opinion of the draftsman it is necessary to keep postal services standards at the same level without negative changes that could affect individual consumers.
Visoki standardi poštnih storitev so temeljnega pomena za vse gospodarske in socialne dejavnosti na notranjem trgu.
High standards of postal services are essential to all economic and social activities within internal market.
Pripravljavec mnenja se zavzema za to, da se na eni strani univerzalna poštna storitev ohrani in pozitivno razvija dalje, na drugi strani pa, da se izboljša kakovost same storitve, kar pomeni tudi njeno hitrost in zanesljivost.
The draftsman supports securing the maintenance and positive evolution of the universal postal service on the one hand and the improvement of the quality of the service on the other, including speed and reliability.
Za državljane in podjetja po vsej Evropski uniji je treba zagotoviti kar najboljše in najučinkovitejše poštne storitve.
It is necessary to ensure the best and most cost effective postal services for citizens and business throughout the European Union.
Zaradi tega se zdi, da je prenagljeno stremeti k dokončnemu oblikovanju notranjega trga poštnih storitev z letom 2009, kot to sedaj predvideva direktiva.
Therefore, the target date (2009) envisaged in the original directive is not appropriate.
Pripravljavec osnutka mnenja zato predlaga, da se ta datum prestavi na 1. januar 2011.
The draftsman proposes to defer total postal market liberalisation until 1 January 2011.
Umestneje je namreč prestaviti izvajanje direktive za dve leti, kot se držati strogega urnika, saj bi to lahko imelo za posledico, da določene države članice ne bodo pripravljene na njeno izvajanje in torej ne bodo mogle dejansko zagotoviti prave univerzalne storitve.
It is more appropriate to postpone the implementation of the directive for the period of two years rather than keep the very tight timetable which could raise the risk that some Member States will not be able to comply with it and guarantee a viable universal service.
Če se bo celotni proces sprožil kasneje, bo to pomenilo več časa za boljšo prilagoditev tako na predlagane spremembe kot na potrebe potrošnikov in uporabnikov.
Delaying the process will give more time to adapt better to the proposed changes and consumers' and users' needs.
Za ohranitev kakovostne univerzalne storitve, ki ustreza zahtevanim standardom, pripravljavec mnenja predlaga, da države članice do 31. decembra 2008 pripravijo podrobno študijo o njenem financiranju.
In order to maintain the universal service provisions at the high level and to ensure that it is consistent with the required standards, the draftsman proposes that each Member State should establish by 31 December 2008 with a detailed study fully describing financing of the universal service.
Podrobno izdelan načrt vsake posamezne države članice naj bi bil osnovni pogoj za polno odprtje poštnega trga.
The detailed plan presented by each Member State should be a precondition of fully opening up the postal market.
V načrtu naj države članice predstavijo predvidene ukrepe za neprekinjeno izvajanje univerzalne storitve, za ohranitev kakovosti storitev in za financiranje obveznosti univerzalne storitve.
It should include adequate measures which each Member State plans to take, how the Member State will secure the continuity of the universal service by maintaining the quality of services and how the universal service obligations will be financed.
Vključijo naj tudi ukrepe za prestrukturiranje delovnih mest tradicionalnih poštnih operaterjev po liberalizaciji.
Each Member state should also present restructuring measures affecting employment in traditional postal operators following full liberalisation.
Glede na predlog Komisije lahko države članice izbirajo med različnimi načini financiranja obveznosti univerzalne storitve.
The Commission proposal gives Member States a choice regarding the means to finance universal service obligations.
Izbirajo lahko med državno pomočjo, javnimi naročili, kompenzacijskim skladom in delitvijo stroškov.
Member States should decide which model best suits their needs among: state aid, public procurement, compensation fund and cost sharing.
V ta namen je prav, da države članice v študiji predstavijo, za katero od danih možnosti so se odločile in ali so se odločile za še kakšne druge finančne ukrepe, ki so možni v skladu s predpisi ES.
In the study to be delivered by each Member State the choices among those proposed by the Commission and other financing measures in compliance with EC law should be presented and explained in details.
Na osnovi nacionalnih načrtov in ob upoštevanju razmer na poštnem trgu v državah članicah, kjer bo trg že odprt, bo Komisija pripravila lastno študijo, v kateri bo ocenila vpliv dokončnega oblikovanja notranjega trga poštnih storitev leta 2011.
Based on the national plans and taken into account the situation of the postal market in Member State where the market is already open, the Commission shall carry out a study which will assess the impact of the full accomplishment of the postal internal market in 2011.
Komisija naj bi Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložila tudi poročilo v zvezi s tem, ali je leto 2011 pravi datum za dokončno oblikovanje notranjega trga poštnih storitev.
The Commission should also submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council if the 2011 is appropriate date for a full accomplishment of the postal internal market.
Če se bi izkazalo, da datum ni ustrezen, bo morala Komisija skupaj s poročilom predložiti še ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
If the date is not appropriate, the Commission should submit, together with the report, the relevant legislative proposal.
Glede na to, da so delovanju tržnih sil najbolj izpostavljeni potrošniki ter mala in srednje velika podjetja, je treba oblikovati ustrezno zaščitno klavzulo, kot je denimo uporaba enotnih tarif.
Individual consumers and SMEs are the most vulnerable segment to market forces; therefore it is important to include a safeguard clause for them and one of them could be the maintenance of the uniform tariff system.
Naloga držav članic je, da bdijo nad tem, da so cene poštnih storitev dostopne, za kar poskrbijo preko obveznosti univerzalne storitve.
It is necessary that Member States ensure the affordability of postal costs guaranteed by the universal services obligations.
Države članice morajo tudi poskrbeti, da se za pošiljke, ki so za potrošnika posebnega pomena, ohrani enotna tarifa ne glede na oddaljenost naslovnika.
It is also necessary that Member States maintain the single tariff which is equal irrespective of distance of the addressee for items of particular importance for individual consumers' interest.
Enotne tarife prispevajo k socialni in gospodarski koheziji.
The maintenance of the single tariffs contributes to social and economical cohesion.
Za podeželska in oddaljena območja je zelo pomembno zagotovilo, da ne bodo nosila bremena velikih stroškov zaradi odprtega poštnega trga.
It is important that rural and remote areas will not be negatively affected by significant changes brought by an open postal market.
Zbiranje in raznašanje pošte mora v teh predelih potekati nemoteno.
Mail must be collected and delivered to these areas without interruption.
Univerzalna storitev za izvajalce predstavlja obveznost, lahko celo breme, zato so nujni ustrezni ukrepi, s katerimi bodo za državljane zagotovljene kakovostne univerzalne storitve.
Universal service is an obligation and might be a burden for universal service providers; therefore it is necessary to apply adequate measures to ensure high level universal service to citizens.
Poleg tega morajo države članice izbrati najboljši in zanje najustreznejši način financiranja, ki bo združeval možnosti, ki jih vsebuje predlog Komisije, in druge vire financiranja v skladu s predpisi ES.
It is also important for Member States to choose the best way of financing which is most appropriate for them including the ones proposed by the Commission proposal as well as other ways of financing in compliance with EC law.
UVODNA IZJAVA 3 A (NOVO)
RECITAL 3 A (NEW)
(3a) Posebni evrobarometer št. 219 iz oktobra 2005 je poudaril pozitivno vlogo storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena in pokazal, da so med temi poštne storitve tiste, ki jih uporabniki po vsej Evropski uniji najbolj cenijo, saj je 77 % vprašanih odgovorilo pozitivno.
(3a) The positive role of services of general economic interest is emphasised by Special Eurobarometer 219 of October 2005, which indicates that postal services are the services of general economic interest that are the most appreciated by users throughout the European Union, with 77% of people questioned responding positively .
Ker se obveznosti univerzalne storitve po posameznih državah članicah pogosto zelo različno razvijajo, je Evropski parlament Komisijo pozval, naj pri izvajanju možnostne študije svoja prizadevanja osredotoči na kakovost zagotovljenih univerzalnih storitev in njihovega prihodnjega financiranja ter naj v okviru študije predlaga opredelitev, obseg in primeren način financiranja univerzalne storitve.
In view of the sometimes very divergent development of universal service obligations in the Member States, the European Parliament has requested the Commission to concentrate its efforts, when drawing up its prospective study, on the quality of universal service provision and its future financing, and as part of the study to propose a definition of universal service, its scope and approp ria te financing.
Ko Komisija začenja z izvajanjem možnostne študije, ne smemo pozabiti na zelo natančne zahteve, ki jih je nanjo naslovil Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji o izvajanju poštne direktive z dne 2. februarja 2006.
It is necessary to keep in mind Parliament’s very precise requests to the Commission in its resolution of 2 February 2006 on the implementation of the postal directive as the Commission begins work on its prospective study.
Vendar pa je za resnično razumevanje vseh posledic, ki jih bo imelo popolno izoblikovanje notranjega trga za zaposlovanje ter za socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo, potrebno obširnejše posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi.
However, in order to reach a full understanding of all the consequences of the full accomplishment of the postal internal market for employment and social and territo ria l cohesion broader consultation of interested parties is needed.
Zaradi posledic, ki jih bo imelo popolno odprtje trga v poštnem sektorju, mora Komisija izvesti temeljito študijo o vplivu liberalizacije na zaposlovanje ter socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo.
Given the implications of the full market opening in the postal sector, the Commission should make a thorough study if the impact of liberalisation on employment and social and territorial cohesion.
(8) Glede na možnostno študijo je osnovni cilj zaščite trajnostnega zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve, ki ustreza standardu kakovosti, ki so ga države članice določile v skladu z Direktivo 97/67/ES, mogoče zagotoviti po vsej Skupnosti do leta 2009 brez potrebe po rezerviranem področju .
(8) According to the prospective study the basic aim of safeguarding the sustainable provision of a universal service matching the standard of quality defined by the Member States in accordance with Directive 97/67/EC, can be secured throughout the Community by 2009 without the need for a reserved area.
(8) Glede na možnostno študijo, zlasti na razvojne dosežke pri alternativnih načinih financiranja, osnovnega cilja zaščite trajnostnega zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve, ki ustreza standardu kakovosti, ki so ga države članice določile v skladu z Direktivo 97/67/ES, ni mogoče zagotoviti po vsej Skupnosti do leta 2009 brez rezerviranega področja za države članice, v katerih je to financiranje še vedno potrebno .
(8) According to the prospective study , in particular the developments in alternative financing methods, the basic aim of safeguarding the sustainable provision of a universal service matching the standard of quality defined by the Member States in accordance with Directive 97/67/EC, cannot be secured throughout the Community by 2009 without a reserved area for those Member States where this financing is still necessary .
Rezerviranega področja se ne sme izključiti iz financiranja obveznosti univerzalne storitve, dokler Komisija ne opravi popolne študije o načinih financiranja.
The reserved area should not be excluded of the financing of the universal service obligations as long as the Commission has note made a complete study in the financing methods.
Države članice lahko izkoristijo priložnost, ki jim jo ponuja obdobje prevzema, in čas , ki je potreben za uvedbo učinkovite konkurence, ter po potrebi nadaljujejo s posodobitvijo in prestrukturiranjem izvajalca(-ev) univerzalne storitve.
Member States may furthermore avail themselves of the opportunity offered by the period of transposition, as well as the substantial time necessary for the introduction of effective competition, to proceed with further modernisation and restructuring of the universal service providers as necessary .
(9) Postopno odpiranje poštnega trga ni dalo vsem izvajalcem univerzalne storitve dovolj časa za uvedbo ukrepov posodobitve in prestrukturiranja, ki so potrebni za zagotavljanje dolgoročne sposobnosti preživetja pod novimi tržnimi pogoji in poleg tega ni vsem državam članicam omogočilo, da prilagodijo svoje regulativne sisteme bolj odprtemu okolju.
(9) The progressive and gradual opening of postal markets to competition has not provided all universal service providers with sufficient time to put in place the necessary modernisation and restructuring measures required to ensure their long-term viability under the new market conditions, and has not enabled all Member States to adapt their regulatory systems to a more open environment.
Glede na čas, ki je potreben za uvedbo enakih možnosti in nadaljnjo posodobitev in prestrukturiranje izvajalca(ev) univerzalne storitve , lahko države članice izkoristijo priložnost, ki jim jo ponuja preložitev datuma za popolno izoblikovanje notranjega trga .
Given the time necessary for the introduction of a level playing field and for proceeding with further modernisation and restructuring of the universal service providers , Member States may avail themselves of the opportunity offered by a postponement of the date of full accomplishment of the internal market .
Vseeno ostaja dejstvo, da je stopnja pripravljenosti v državah članicah zelo različna, to pa zaradi kompleksne narave procesa, na katerega vplivajo tržni, socialni in kohezijski vidiki, razmere na trgu delovne sile, pa tudi precejšnje razlike, ki med državami članicami obstajajo zaradi zemljepisnih in tržnih pogojev ter načina obravnave potrošnikov.
Due to the complexity of this process, which has market, social, cohesion and employment aspects and must also address substantial geographic, market and consumer-related differences among Member States, the level of preparedness by Member States still varies significantly.