natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7-0044/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0044/2011 ),
Mednarodne odnose na področju letalstva med državami članicami in tretjimi državami običajno urejajo dvostranski sporazumi o zračnih prevozih.
International aviation relations between Member States and third countries have traditionally been governed by bilateral air services agreements.
Evropsko sodišče je leta 2002 razsodilo, da so običajne klavzule o določitvi, ki jih države članice uporabljajo v bilateralnih sporazumih na področju letalstva, v nasprotju s pravnim redom EU.
The EU Court of Justice ruled in 2002 that traditional designation clauses in Member States’ bilateral air services agreements infringe EU law.
Tretji državi omogočajo, da zavrne, odvzame ali začasno prekliče dovoljenja ali pooblastila letalskega prevoznika, ki ga je določila država članica, vendar ki ni v pretežni lasti in pod dejanskim nadzorom navedene države članice ali njenih državljanov.
They allow a third country to reject, withdraw or suspend the permissions or authorisations of an air carrier that has been designated by a Member State but that is not substantially owned and effectively controlled by that Member State or its nationals.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da to pomeni diskriminacijo prevoznikov EU, ki imajo sedež na ozemlju države članice, vendar so v lasti in pod nadzorom državljanov drugih držav članic.
This has been found to constitute discrimination against EU carriers established in the territory of a Member State but owned and controlled by nationals of other Member States.
To je v nasprotju s členom 49 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki državljanom držav članic, ki so uveljavili svojo pravico do ustanavljanja, zagotavlja, da bodo v državi članici gostiteljici enako obravnavani kot njeni državljani.
This is contrary to Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union which guarantees nationals of Member States who have exercised their freedom of establishment the same treatment in the host Member State as that accorded to nationals of that Member State.
Obstajajo še druga področja, kot je konkurenca, kjer je treba skladnost s pravnim redom EU zagotoviti tako, da se spremenijo ali dopolnijo obstoječe določbe iz dvostranskih sporazumov o zračnem prometu med državami članicami in tretjimi državami.
There are also further issues, such as competition, where compliance with EU law should be ensured through amending or complementing existing provisions in bilateral air services agreements between Member States and third countries.
Zato je Komisija s pogajanji uskladila sporazum, ki nadomešča nekatere določbe obstoječih 17 dvostranskih sporazumov o zračnem prevozu, ki so jih države članice EU sklenile z Vietnamom.
Thus, the Commission has negotiated the Agreement that replaces certain provisions in the existing 17 bilateral air services agreements concluded between EU Member States and Vietnam.
Glavni vidiki sporazuma
Main aspects of the Agreement
Člen 2 (Klavzula o določitvi): da bi se preprečila diskriminacija med letalskimi prevozniki EU, se običajne klavzule o določitvi, ki veljajo za letalske prevoznike države članice, ki je pogodbenica dvostranskega sporazuma, nadomestijo s klavzulo EU, ki se nanaša na vse letalske prevoznike EU.
Article 2 (designation clause): To avoid discrimination between EU air carriers, the traditional designation clauses, referring to air carriers of the Member State party to the bilateral agreement, are replaced by an EU designation clause, referring to all EU carriers.
Cilj je omogočiti vsem letalskimi prevoznikom EU nediskriminacijski dostop do zračnih poti med Evropsko unijo in Vietnamom.
The objective is to give all EU air carriers non-discriminatory access to routes between the European Union and Vietnam.
Člen 3 (Varnost): ta določba zagotavlja, da določbe o varnosti iz dvostranskih sporazumov veljajo tudi za primere, ko predpisanega nadzora nad letalskim prevoznikom ne izvaja država članica, ki je letalskega prevoznika določila.
Article 3 (safety): This provision ensures that safety provisions in bilateral agreements are applicable to situations when regulatory control over an air carrier is exercised by Member State other than Member State that designated that air carrier.
Člen 4: (Skladnost s pravili o konkurenci): ta člen prepoveduje nelojalno konkurenco.
Article 4: (Compatibility with competition rules) This Article prohibits anti-competitive practices.
Sporazum je bil podpisan 4. oktobra 2010.
The Agreement was signed on 4 October 2010.
Za njegovo sklenitev potrebuje Svet odobritev Evropskega parlamenta.
To conclude the Agreement, the Council needs the consent of the European Parliament.
V skladu s členom 81 poslovnika Parlament sprejme sklep z enim glasovanjem, predlogov sprememb sporazuma pa ni mogoče vložiti.
In accordance with Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure the Parliament shall take a decision by means of a single vote, and no amendments to the agreement itself may be tabled."
Na podlagi navedenega poročevalec predlaga, naj Odbor za promet in turizem poda pozitivno mnenje o sklenitvi tega sporazuma.
On the basis of the above-mentioned your Rapporteur suggests that the TRAN committee should give a favourable opinion on the conclusion of this Agreement.
Georges Bach, Antonio Cancian, Saïd El Khadraoui, Carlo Fidanza, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Kumucakos (Georgios Koumoutsakos), Eva Lichtenberger, Hella Ranner, Olga Sehnalová, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Keith Taylor, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Peter van Dalen, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Georges Bach, Antonio Cancian, Saïd El Khadraoui, Carlo Fidanza, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Eva Lichtenberger, Hella Ranner, Olga Sehnalová, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Keith Taylor, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Peter van Dalen, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Philip Bradbourn, Frieda Brepoels, Spiros Danelis (Spyros Danellis), Ádám Kósa, Janusz Władysław Zemke
Philip Bradbourn, Frieda Brepoels, Spyros Danellis, Ádám Kósa, Janusz Władysław Zemke
o osnutku sklepa Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic Evropske unije, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o sklenitvi Sporazuma o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kanado na drugi
on the draft decision of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council on the conclusion of the Agreement on Air Transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Canada, of the other part
o osnutku sklepa Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic Evropske unije, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o sklenitvi Sporazuma o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kanado na drugi
on the draft decision of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union , meeting within the Council on the conclusion of the Agreement on Air Transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Canada, of the other part
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta (15380/2010),
– having regard to the draft decision of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council (15380/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kanado na drugi (08303/10/2009),
– having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Community and its Member States and Canada on air transport (08303/10/2009),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet predložil v skladu s členom 100(2), točko (a)(v) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) in prvim pododstavkom člena 218(8) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0386/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2), Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(8) first subparagraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0386/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7–0045/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0045/2011 ),
Lizbonska pogodba, ki je začela veljati 1. decembra 2009, je povečala število področij, na katerih je za sklenitev mednarodnega sporazuma potrebno odobritev Parlamenta.
The Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, extended the circumstances in which Parliament’s consent was required for the conclusion of an international agreement.
Prej se je Svet o takih sporazumih zgolj posvetoval s Parlamentom.
Previously Parliament had only been consulted on such agreements.
Kljub dolgoletnim političnim in gospodarskim vezem med EU in Kanado je bilo letalstvo pred tem sporazumom predmet dvostranskih sporazumov z 19 državami članicami EU.
Although the EU and Canada have long-standing economic and political ties, prior to the current Agreement, aviation was the subject of bilateral agreements with 19 of the EU Member States.
Številni med njimi so bili omejevalni in niso omogočali popolnega dostopa do trgov.
Many of these agreements were restrictive and did not offer full access to the respective markets.
Novembra 2002 je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti razsodilo, da so nekatere določbe v teh dvostranskih sporazumih nezdružljive s pravom Skupnosti.
In November 2002, the European Court of Justice ruled that certain provisions in these bilateral agreements were incompatible with Community law.
Zato je oktobra 2007 Svet Komisijo pooblastil za pogajanja o celovitem sporazumu o letalstvu, ki bi nadomestil veljavne dvostranske sporazume.
The Council therefore gave the Commission a mandate, in October 2007, to negotiate a comprehensive aviation agreement in place of the existing bilateral agreements.
V tem letu je med EU in Kanado potovalo devet milijonov ljudi.
In that year nine million people were travelling between the EU and Canada.
V pooblastilu za pogajanja je bil določen cilj vzpostaviti odprti zračni prostor (OAA) med EU in Kanado.
The negotiating mandate set the objective of establishing an Open Aviation Area (OAA) between the EU and Canada.
Tako bi se oblikoval enotni trg za zračni promet, na katerem bi se naložbe lahko prosto pretakale in na katerem bi lahko letalski prevozniki EU in Kanade zagotavljali zračni prevoz brez omejitev, tudi na domačih trgih obeh pogodbenic.
This would create a single market for air transport in which investment could flow freely and where European and Canadian airlines would be able to provide air services without any restriction, including in the domestic markets of both parties.
Za popolno uresničitev pooblastila bi bile potrebne bistvene zakonodajne spremembe v Kanadi, zlasti pri odpravi sedanjih pravnih omejitev za tuje lastništvo in nadzor kanadskih letalskih prevoznikov ter za kabotažo.
Achievement of the mandate in full would require significant legislative changes in Canada, in particular to remove the existing legal restrictions on foreign ownership and control of Canadian airlines and on cabotage.
Zato je bila v pooblastilu izrecno predvidena možnost izvajanja sporazuma po stopnjah.
For this reason, the mandate explicitly recognised the possibility of implementing an agreement in a phased approach.
EU se je med pogajanji strinjala, da popolnega odprtja za naložbe ne bi bilo možno zagotoviti že na začetku, ampak bi ga uvajali postopno na različnih stopnjah med prehodnim obdobjem.
The EU accepted during the negotiations that full investment opening could not be achieved from the start, but would be gradually introduced in different phases during a transitional period.
Sporazum o zračnem prometu EU–Kanada je bil parafiran 30. novembra 2008, potrjen je bil na vrhu EU–Kanada 6. maja 2009, podpisan pa 17. in 18. decembra 2009.
The EU-Canada Air Transport Agreement was initialled on 30 November 2008, endorsed by the EU-Canada summit on 6 May 2009 and signed on 17-18 December 2009.
Vsebina sporazuma
Content of the Agreement
Sporazum zajema postopno uvedbo prometnih pravic, naložbenih priložnosti in daljnosežnega sodelovanja v zvezi s številnimi vprašanji, ko so varnost, zaščita, socialne zadeve, interesi potrošnikov, okolje, upravljanje zračnega prometa, državne pomoči in konkurenca.
The Agreement includes a gradual phasing-in of traffic rights and investment opportunities, as well as far reaching cooperation on a number of issues including safety, security, social matters, consumer interests, environment, air traffic management, state aids and competition.
Vsi letalski prevozniki iz EU bodo lahko opravljali direktne lete v Kanado od koder koli v Evropi.
All EU airlines will be able to operate direct flights to Canada from anywhere in Europe.
Sporazum odpravlja vse omejitve glede prog, cen ali števila tedenskih letov med Kanado in EU.
The Agreement removes all restrictions on routes, prices, or the number of weekly flights between Canada and the EU.
Letalski prevozniki bodo lahko prosto sklepali komercialne dogovore, na primer o poletih pod skupno oznako, ki so pomembni za tiste letalske prevoznike, ki letijo na številna letališča, in določali cene v skladu s konkurenčnim pravom.
Airlines will be free to enter into commercial arrangements such as code-share agreements, which are important for airlines serving a large number of destinations, and to establish their tariffs in line with competition law.
Sporazum vsebuje določbe za postopno odpiranje trga, povezano z zagotavljanjem večje naložbene svobode na obeh straneh.
The Agreement contains provisions for the phased market opening linked to the granting of greater investment freedoms by both sides:
Prva stopnja velja, kadar je tuje lastništvo letalskega prevoznika omejeno na 25 %, kakor je veljalo v času, ko so se pogajanja o sporazumu zaključila.
Phase one applies where the foreign ownership of airlines is limited to 25 per cent, as was the case when the negotiations on the agreement were completed.
Letalski prevozniki imajo neomejeno svobodo pri opravljanju direktnih letov med katero koli točko v Evropi in katero koli točko v Kanadi.
Airlines have unlimited freedom to operate direct services between any point in Europe and any point in Canada.
Število letalskih prevoznikov, ki letijo med EU in Kanado, in število prevozov, ki jih letalski prevoznik opravi, ni več omejeno.
There will no longer be limitations on the number of airlines flying between the EU and Canada nor on the number of services operated by any airline.
Tovorni letalski prevozniki imajo pravico do letenja v tretje države.
Cargo airlines will have the right to fly onward to third countries.
Druga stopnja se začne, takoj ko Kanada sprejme ukrepe, ki evropskim vlagateljem omogočajo do 49-odstoten delež lastništva kapitala z glasovalno pravico v kanadskih letalskih prevoznikih.
Phase two starts as soon as Canada has taken the steps necessary to enable European investors to own up to 49% of a Canadian carriers' voting equity.
To pomeni nekatere dodatne pravice, vključno s pravico tovornih letalskih prevoznikov do letov v tretje države brez povezave z njihovim krajem izvora (tako imenovane pravice iz „sedme svoboščine“).
This means certain additional rights, including the right for cargo operators to provide services to third countries from the other party without connection to their point of origin (so called "7th freedom" rights) will be available.
Kanada je to možnost uvedla marca 2009.
In fact, Canada introduced this possibility in March 2009.
Tretja stopnja se začne, ko obe strani vlagateljem omogočita vzpostavitev novih letalskih prevoznikov na trgih partnerice in nadzor nad njimi.
Phase three begins once both sides enable investors to set up and control new airlines in each others' markets.
Potniški letalski prevozniki imajo možnost letenja v tretje države.
Then passenger airlines will be able to fly onward to third countries.
Četrta stopnja je zadnji korak s polnimi pravicami do letov med obema trgoma, na in zunaj njih, tudi med točkami na ozemlju druge partnerice (kabotaža).
Phase four is the final step with full rights to operate between, within and beyond both markets, including between points in the territory of the other party (cabotage).
Ta stopnja bo zagotovljena, ko bosta obe pogodbenici izvedli ukrepe, ki bodo državljanom druge pogodbenice omogočali polno lastništvo njihovih letalskih prevoznikov in nadzor nad njimi.
It will be granted once both sides complete steps to allow the full ownership and control of their carriers by nationals of the other party.
Obe pogodbenici sta se dogovorili, da bosta tesno sodelovali pri blažitvi posledic podnebnih sprememb.
Both sides agreed to cooperate closely in order to mitigate the effects of aviation on climate change.
Na področju varovanja in varnosti sporazum predvideva vzajemno priznavanje standardov in enkratne varnostne preglede (npr. transferni potniki, prtljaga in tovor bi bili izvzeti iz dodatnih varnostnih ukrepov).
In the field of safety and security, the agreement envisages mutual recognition of standards and "one-stop security" (i.e. transfer passengers, luggage and cargo would be exempted from any additional security measures).
Posebne določbe so namenjene tudi povečanju interesov potrošnikov, vključno z zavezo o posvetovanju, da bi se dosegel kar se da skladen pristop pri vprašanjih, kot so odškodnine za zavrnjeno vkrcanje, ukrepi za dostopnost in povračilo stroškov potnikom.
There are also specific provisions to improve consumer interests including a commitment to consult, with a view to achieving compatible approaches so far as this is possible, on issues such as compensation for denied boarding, accessibility measures and passenger refunds.
Besedilo določa močan mehanizem, ki bo preprečeval diskriminacijo letalskih prevoznikov pri dostopu do infrastrukture ali državnih subvencijah.
The text provides for a strong mechanism to ensure that airlines cannot face discrimination in terms of access to infrastructure or state subsidies.
Sporazum lahko upravičeno opišemo kot najambiciozneje zastavljen sporazum o zračnem prometu med EU in eno pomembnejših svetovnih partneric.
This Agreement can fairly be described as the most ambitious air transport agreement between the EU and a major world partner.
Sporazum bo zelo izboljšal povezanost obeh trgov in medosebne stike, s postopno liberalizacijo pravil o tujem lastništvu pa bo ustvaril tudi nove možnosti za letalski sektor.
It will significantly improve both the connections between respective markets and people-to-people links, as well as creating new opportunities for the airline sector through a gradual liberalisation of foreign ownership rules.
Je zlasti ambicioznejši in natančnejši od sporazuma med EU in ZDA na področju prometnih pravic, lastništva in nadzora, tudi glede na začasno uporabo spremembe protokola („druga stopnja“).
In particular, it is more ambitious and specific than the EU-US Agreement with regard to traffic rights, ownership and control, even following the provisional application of the amending Protocol ("2nd stage").
Študija, ki jo je sprožila Komisija, kaže, da bi s prostim sporazumom s Kanado v prvem letu pridobili dodatnega pol milijona potnikov, v nekaj letih pa lahko pričakujemo, da bo priložnosti, ki jih ponuja tak sporazum, izkoristilo dodatnih 3,5 milijona potnikov.
According to a study launched by the Commission, an open agreement with Canada would generate an additional half million passengers in its first year and, within a few years, 3.5 million extra passengers might be expected to take advantage of the opportunities such an agreement could offer.
Sporazum bi lahko prinesel za vsaj 72 milijonov EUR koristi za potrošnike zaradi nižjih prevoznin, ustvaril pa bi tudi nova delovna mesta.
The Agreement could generate consumer benefits of at least €72 million through lower fares and would also create new jobs.
Čeprav je ambicioznejši od sporazuma z ZDA na področju dostopa do trgov, je manj neposreden pri priznavanju pomena socialne razsežnosti.
Although this Agreement is more ambitious than that with the US regarding market access, it is less explicit when it comes to recognising the importance of the social dimension.
Obe pogodbenici sicer lahko zahtevata sestanek skupnega odbora za preučitev vpliva sporazuma na delo, zaposlovanje in delovne pogoje, vendar sporazum ne vsebuje izrecne izjave, da „priložnosti, ki jih ustvarja Sporazum, nimajo namena ogrožati standardov dela“
While either party may request a meeting of the Joint Committee to consider the Agreement's effects on labour, employment and working conditions, there is no explicit statement that "the opportunities created by the Agreement are not intended to undermine labour standards"
Primerjaj s členom 17(a) sporazuma EU-ZDA , skupnemu odboru pa tudi ni treba upoštevati „socialnih posledic Sporazuma, kakor se izvaja, ter [razvijati] ustreznih odzivov na utemeljene pomisleke“
Compare Article 17(b) of the EU-US Agreement nor is the Joint Committee required to consider "the social effects of the Agreement as it is implemented and [develop] appropriate responses to concerns found to be legitimate"
Člen 18(4)(b) po spremembi protokola. .
Article 18(4)(b) following amendment by the Protocol .
Zato je pomembno, da Komisija sporazum, zlasti pa sklicevanje na skupni odbor, uporabi za spodbujanje skladnosti z ustrezno mednarodno zakonodajo o socialnih pravicah, zlasti delovnih standardov, vsebovanih v temeljnih konvencijah Mednarodne organizacije dela (ILO 1930–1999), smernic OECD za večnacionalna podjetja (1976, dopolnjenih 2000) in Rimske konvencije o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja (1980).
It is therefore important that the Commission uses the Agreement and, in particular, the possibility of reference to the Joint Committee, to promote compliance with relevant international legislation on social rights, in particular the labour standards embodied in the fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO 1930-1999), the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976, revised 2000) and the Rome Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations of 1980.
Nedvomno je potrebno okrepljeno posvetovanje in sodelovanje na področju zaščite, zlasti glede na sedanje mednarodne razmere.
Increased consultation and cooperation on security is undoubtedly needed, particularly in the light of the current international situation.
Vendar zaradi tega ne bi smelo prihajati do pretiranih ali neusklajenih ukrepov, ki ne temeljijo na ustreznih ocenah tveganja.
However, this should not lead to excessive or uncoordinated measures that lack a proper risk assessment.
Zato bi bilo dobrodošlo, če bi Komisija in Kanada preverili učinkovitost dodatnih varnostnih ukrepov, sprejetih od leta 2001 dalje, ter odstranili prekrivajoče se in šibke člene v varnostni verigi.
It would therefore be desirable that the Commission and Canada review the efficiency of the additional security measures adopted since 2001 so as to eliminate overlapping and weak links in the security chain.
Pri tem je treba pozdraviti cilj sporazuma o enkratnem varnostnem pregledu namesto ponovnega pregleda potnikov in prtljage ob vsakem prestopanju.
In this context, the Agreement's objective of "one-stop security", rather than rechecking passengers and luggage at every transfer, is to be welcomed.