natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5. poudarja, da je treba vidik spola kot pomemben element vključiti v mirovne raziskave, v preprečevanje in reševanje konfliktov, mirovne operacije ter sanacijo in obnovo po konfliktih, v finančne instrumente, strateške dokumente o državah in regijah ter v načrtovanje vseh zunanjih posredovanj;
Points out the need to mainstream a gender perspective into peace research, conflict prevention and resolution, peacekeeping operations, post-conflict rehabilitation and reconstruction, financial instruments, Country/Regional Strategy Papers and in the planning of all external interventions;
9. vztraja, da je treba zagotoviti, da bodo ženske po koncu spora končale in nadaljevale izobraževanje in usposabljanje; zato meni, da je treba pri obnovi države dejavno spodbujati ponovno vzpostavitev poučevanja;
Stresses the need for women to resume or further their education and training post-conflict; considers, in this connection, that the resumption of teaching should be actively promoted during nation-building processes;
12. poudarja, da je boj proti pojavu otrok vojakov ter novačenju deklet v vojsko, kjer so žrtve spolnega zlorabljanja, povezan z bojem za izboljšanje vsakdanjega življenja žensk, ki živijo na območjih, na katerih potekata utrjevanje miru in obnova države v pokonfliktnih razmerah;
Stresses that action to combat the use of child soldiers and the recruitment of girls into the armed forces and their subsequent subjection to sexual abuse ties in with action to improve the daily lives of women living in regions in which post-conflict peace-building and nation-building are in progress;
Mary Honeyball, Marusja Ivanova Ljubčeva, Maria Petre, Petja Stavreva
Mary Honeyball, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Maria Petre, Petya Stavreva
o razvojnih možnostih pri vzpostavljanju miru in izgradnji države v pokonfliktnih razmerah
on development perspectives on peace-building and nation building in post-conflict situations
3. poudarja tudi potrebo po uporabi socialnih in ekonomskih ukrepov za odpravo revščine ter pospešitev ekonomskega in socialnega razvoja, ki lahko ustvari okolje, v katerem konflikti ne bodo znova izbruhnili;
Points out also the need to employ social and economic measures aimed at eliminating poverty and fostering economic and social development that can create the environment required to prevent the resurgence of conflict;
6. poudarja vlogo nadregionalnega sodelovanja pri medsektorskih vprašanjih in na področjih, ki segajo prek političnih meja; poziva Komisijo in Svet, da sprejmeta regionalni pristop k reševanju razmer v posameznih državah;
Highlights the role of transregional cooperation in cross-cutting issues and in areas that transcend political borders; calls on the Commission and the Council to adopt a regional approach to tackling the situation in individual countries;
8. spodbuja EU k oblikovanju najboljših praks glede vprašanj, ki zahtevajo tesno sodelovanje političnih, vojaških, humanitarnih in razvojnih akterjev na področju preprečevanja konfliktov, mediacije, ohranjanja miru, spoštovanja človekovih pravic, vladavine prava, humanitarne pomoči ter dolgoročne obnove in razvoja;
Encourages the EU to develop best practices for issues that require broad cooperation among political, military, humanitarian and developmental actors in the areas of conflict prevention, mediation, peacekeeping, respect for human rights, the rule of law, humanitarian assistance and long-term reconstruction and development;
12. poudarja bistveno potrebo po nadaljnji krepitvi vojaških zmogljivosti EVOP, da bodo Evropska unija in njene države članice bolje usposobljene za prispevanje k stabilizaciji in razvoju pokonfliktnih družb;
Stresses the essential need to continue to develop the military capacity of the ESDP in order for the European Union and its Member States to be better able to contribute to the stabilisation and development of post-conflict societies;
17. potrjuje bistveni pomen pravičnih migracijskih politik v odnosu do držav v razvoju; opozarja, da je migracije mogoče spremeniti v pozitivno silo v procesu razvoja, zlasti z nakazili, ki jih pošiljajo v EU živeči migranti, z omejevanjem bega možganov, lajšanjem povratne migracije in preprečevanjem trgovine z ljudmi;
Affirms the vital importance of fair migration policies towards developing countries; notes that migration can be turned into a positive force in the development process, notably by means of remittances sent by migrants living in the EU, by curtailing the brain drain, by facilitating return migration and by preventing trafficking in human beings;
19. poudarja, da mora ustrezna strategija doseganja sprave upoštevati vlogo žensk v procesih vzpostavljanja miru; poudarja, da morajo programi za doseganje sprave upoštevati posebne okoliščine otrok, prizadetih zaradi oboroženih konfliktov;
Stresses that a suitable reconciliation strategy needs to take account of the role of women in peace consolidation processes; emphasises that reconciliation programmes must incorporate the specific circumstances of children affected by armed conflict;
22. poudarja potrebo po pomoči lokalnim organom z zagotavljanjem ustreznega usposabljanja in izmenjavo izkušenj; v zvezi s tem opozarja na zavezanost Parlamenta načelom in praksam parlamentarne demokracije;
Stresses the need to aid local authorities, providing suitable training and sharing experiences; recalls, in this connection, Parliament's commitment to the principles and practices of parliamentary democracy;
Carlo Fatuzzo, Patrick Gaubert, Tunne Kelam, Nikolaj Mladenov, Jean Spautz, Johan Van Hecke
Carlo Fatuzzo, Patrick Gaubert, Tunne Kelam, Nickolay Mladenov, Jean Spautz, Johan Van Hecke
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................15
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 15
o poročilu o zavajajočih podjetjih za imeniške storitve (peticije št. 0045/2006, 1476/2006, 0079/2003, 0819/2003, 1010/2005, 0052/2007, 0306/2007, 0444/2007, 0562/2007 in druge)
on the Misleading Directory Companies report (Petitions 0045/2006, 1476/2006, 0079/2003, 0819/2003, 1010/2005, 0052/2007, 0306/2007, 0444/2007, 0562/2007 and others)
– ob upoštevanju peticij št. 0045/2006, 1476/2006, 0079/2003, 0819/2003, 1010/2005, 0052/2007, 0306/2007, 0444/2007, 0562/2007 in drugih,
– having regard to Petitions 0045/2006, 1476/2006, 0079/2003, 0819/2003, 1010/2005, 0052/2007, 0306/2007, 0444/2007, 0562/2007 and others,
– ob upoštevanju prejšnjih razprav odbora za peticije o peticiji št. 45/2006 in drugih peticijah,
– having regard to previous deliberations of the Committee on Petitions on Petition 45/2006 and others,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/114/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju (kodificirano besedilo)
– having regard to Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (codified version)
21. , ki je nadomestila Direktivo 84/450/EGS
21. , which replaced Directive 84/450/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 84/450/EGS z dne 10. septembra 1984 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o zavajajočem oglaševanju (UL L 250, 19.9.1984, str.
Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning misleading advertising (OJ L 250, 19.9.1984, p.
17). , kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/55/ES
17). as amended by Directive 97/55/EC
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu (direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah)
– having regard to Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (“Unfair Commercial Practices Directive”)
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov (uredba o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov)
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation)
UL L 364, 9.12.2004, str.
OJ L 364, 9.12.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 98/27/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 1998 o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov
– having regard to Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests
– ob upoštevanju študije z naslovom Zavajajoče prakse podjetij za imeniške storitve v okviru sedanje in prihodnje tržne zakonodaje za zaščito potrošnikov ter malih in srednjih podjetij (IP/A/IMCO/FWC/2006-058/LOT4/C1/SC6), ki jo je naročil odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov,
– having regard to the study entitled “Misleading practices of ‘directory companies’ in the context of current and future internal market legislation aimed at the protection of consumers and SMEs” (IP/A/IMCO/FWC/2006-058/LOT4/C1/SC6), commissioned by its Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection,
– ob upoštevanju člena 192(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 192(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6-0446/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions and the opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0446/2008 ),
A. ker je Parlament prejel več kot 400 peticij, kar je le del malih podjetij, ki trdijo, da so žrtve zavajajočega oglaševanja podjetij za imeniške storitve in so zato doživela psihološko obremenitev, občutek krivde, zadrego, razočaranje ter so imela finančno izgubo,
A. whereas Parliament has received more than 400 petitions from small businesses (reflecting only a fraction of their number) who claim to have fallen victim to misleading advertising by business-directory companies and to have suffered, in consequence, psychological stress, feelings of guilt, embarrassment, frustration and financial loss,
B. ker te pritožbe kažejo na razširjenost in usklajen vzorec zavajajočih poslovnih praks, ki jih uporabljajo nekatera podjetja za imeniške storitve in imajo posledice za tisoče podjetij, ki so organizirana prek meja in vključujejo dejavnosti v dveh ali več državah članicah v Evropski uniji in zunaj nje, ter imajo zanje velike finančne posledice, ter ker ni upravnega mehanizma ali pravnega instrumenta, ki bi nacionalnim organom pregona omogočil smotrno in učinkovito čezmejno sodelovanje,
B. whereas these complaints reflect a widespread and concerted pattern of misleading business practices on the part of certain business-directory companies affecting thousands of businesses that are organised across frontiers and thus involve activity in two or more Member States within the European Union and beyond, with a significant financial impact on such businesses, and whereas there is no administrative mechanism or legal instrument enabling the national law-enforcement agencies to work together across borders efficiently and effectively,
C. ker zavajajoča narava teh praks postane očitnejša, ko so v elektronski obliki in se razširjajo z uporabo spleta (glej peticijo št. 0079/2003),
C. whereas the misleading character of these practices becomes more obvious when they are of an electronic nature and are spread using the Internet (see Petition No 0079/2003),
D. ker poslovne prakse, na katere se nanašajo pritožbe, navadno vključujejo ponudbo podjetij za imeniške storitve, navadno po pošti, drugim podjetjem, naj izpolnijo ali posodobijo podrobnosti o svoji firmi in kontaktnih podatkih, pod lažnim vtisom, da bodo v poslovnem imeniku navedena brezplačno, podpisniki pa pozneje odkrijejo, da so pravzaprav nenamerno podpisali pogodbo o vpisu v poslovni imenik z letno članarino približno 1000 EUR, ki jih navadno zavezuje za najmanj tri leta,
D. whereas the business practices complained of typically consist of an approach made, usually by mail, by a business-directory company to businesses inviting them to complete or update their business name and contact details and giving them the false impression that they will be listed in a business directory free of charge; whereas signatories later discover that they have, in fact, unintentionally signed up to a contract, normally binding them for a minimum of three years, to be listed in a business directory at a yearly charge of some EUR 1 000,
E. ker so obrazci, ki se uporabljajo pri takem početju, navadno dvoumni in težko razumljivi ter napeljujejo na zmotno prepričanje o brezplačnem vpisu v poslovni imenik, v resnici pa podjetja zavežejo k neželenim pogodbam za oglaševanje v tovrstnih imenikih,
E. whereas the forms used in such practices are usually ambiguous and difficult to understand, inducing the erroneous idea of a free listing in a business directory but in fact entrapping businesses into unwanted contracts for advertising in business directories,
F. ker v državah članicah ne obstaja posebna zakonodaja EU niti nacionalna zakonodaja v zvezi s podjetji za imeniške storitve in odnosi med podjetji, ter ker so države članice pristojne, da uvedejo celovitejšo in daljnosežnejšo zakonodajo,
F. whereas neither specific EU legislation nor national legislation exists in Member States concerning directory companies in business-to-business relationships, and whereas Member States have a discretion to introduce more comprehensive and far-reaching legislation,
G. ker se Direktiva 2006/114/ES uporablja tudi za poslovanje med podjetji in „zavajajoče oglaševanje“ opredeljuje kot „vsako oglaševanje, ki na kateri koli način, vključno s predstavitvijo, zavaja ali bi utegnilo zavajati osebe, ki jim je namenjeno, ali osebe, ki jih doseže, in ki bi zaradi svoje zavajajoče narave verjetno vplivalo na ekonomsko obnašanje oseb ali ki iz enakih razlogov škodi ali bi utegnilo škoditi konkurentom“; ker pa so različne razlage tega, kaj je zavajajoče, očitno največja praktična ovira v boju proti takemu ravnanju podjetij za imeniške storitve v odnosih med podjetji,
G. whereas Directive 2006/114/EC also applies to business-to-business transactions and defines “misleading advertising” as “any advertising which in any way, including its presentation, deceives or is likely to deceive the persons to whom it is addressed or whom it reaches and which, by reason of its deceptive nature, is likely to affect their economic behaviour or which, for those reasons, injures or is likely to injure a competitor”; whereas, however, different interpretations of what is “misleading” seem to be a major practical impediment in combating such practices of directory companies in business-to-business relationships,
H. ker Direktiva 2005/29/ES prepoveduje „v tržno gradivo vključiti račun ali podoben zahtevek za plačilo, ki daje potrošniku vtis, da je že naročil izdelek, ki se oglašuje, čeprav tega ni storil“; ker pa se ta direktiva ne uporablja za zavajajoče prakse med podjetji in se zato nanjo v sedanji obliki ni mogoče sklicevati za pomoč vlagateljem peticije, ker pa ta direktiva ne izključuje sistema nacionalnih pravil o nepoštenih trgovskih praksah, ki bi v vseh okoliščinah veljala za potrošnike in podjetja,
H. whereas Directive 2005/29/EC prohibits the practice of “including in marketing material an invoice or similar document seeking payment which gives the consumer the impression that he has already ordered the marketed product when he has not”; whereas, however, that Directive does not apply to business-to-business misleading practices and therefore, in its current form, cannot be relied upon to help the petitioners; whereas, however, that Directive does not preclude a system of national rules on unfair commercial practices that is equally applicable under all circumstances to consumers and enterprises,
I. ker Direktiva 2005/29/ES državam članicam ne preprečuje, da njene uporabe ne bi z nacionalno zakonodajo razširile tudi na podjetja; vendar bi to privedlo do različne ravni zaščite podjetij, ki so žrtve zavajajočega ravnanja podjetij za poslovne imenike v različnih državah članicah,
I. whereas Directive 2005/29/EC does not preclude Member States from extending its application also to businesses through national law, whereas, however, this leads to differing levels of protection for businesses which are victims of misleading practices by business-directory companies in different Member States,
J. ker po uredbi (ES) št. 2006/2004 „kršitev znotraj Skupnosti“ pomeni „vsakršno dejanje ali opustitev v nasprotju z zakonodajo o varstvu interesov potrošnikov iz (a), ki škoduje ali bi utegnila škodovati kolektivnim interesom potrošnikov, ki prebivajo v drugi državi članici ali drugih državah članicah, kot je tista, iz katere izvira ali v kateri je prišlo do storitve dejanja ali opustitve, ali v kateri ima odgovorni prodajalec ali dobavitelj svoj sedež; ali v kateri so na voljo dokazi ali sredstva, ki se nanašajo na dejanje ali opustitev“; ker pa se ta direktiva ne uporablja za zavajajoče prakse med podjetji in se zato nanjo v tej obliki ni mogoče sklicevati niti z njo pomagati vlagateljem peticije,‑
J. whereas Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 defines “intra-Community infringement” as “any act or omission contrary to the laws that protect consumers’ interests … that harms, or is likely to harm, the collective interests of consumers residing in a Member State or Member States other than the Member State where the act or omission originated or took place; or where the responsible seller or supplier is established; or where evidence or assets pertaining to the act or omission are to be found”; whereas, however, that Directive does not apply to business-to-business misleading practices and therefore, in its current form, cannot be relied upon either to help the petitioners,
K. ker večina podpisnikov peticij navaja poslovni imenik European City Guide (proti katerega dejavnostim so bili že sproženi pravni in upravni ukrepi), omenjena pa so še nekatera podjetja za imeniške storitve, na primer Construct Data Verlag, Deutscher Adressdienst GmbH in NovaChannel; druga podjetja za imeniške storitve pa uporabljajo zakonite poslovne prakse,
K. whereas most petitioners name the business directory known as “European City Guide” (the activities of which directory have been the subject of legal and administrative action), but other business-directory companies such as “Construct Data Verlag”, “Deutscher Adressdienst GmbH” and “NovaChannel” are also mentioned; whereas, however, other business-directory companies engage in legitimate business practices,
L. ker so te zavajajoče poslovne prakse v glavnem usmerjene na mala podjetja, vendar so med njimi tudi posamezniki in celo nepridobitni subjekti, kot so nevladne in dobrodelne organizacije, šole, knjižnice in krajevna društva, denimo klubi v društvenih prostorih,
L. whereas the targets of these misleading business practices are, in the main, small businesses but also include professionals and even non-profit making entities such as non-governmental organisations, charities, schools and libraries and local social clubs such as band clubs,
M. ker imajo podjetja za imeniške storitve pogosto sedež v drugi državi članici kot žrtve, zaradi česar te težje poiščejo zaščito nacionalnih organov zaradi različnih razlag tega, kaj je zavajajoče; ker žrtvam pogosto ne pomagajo niti nacionalni zakonodajni okviri in organi za varstvo potrošnikov, češ da je zakon namenjen varstvu potrošnikov, ne podjetij; ker so žrtve večinoma mala podjetja, ki nimajo zadostnih sredstev za uporabo učinkovitih pravnih sredstev s sodnimi postopki, mehanizmi samoregulacije za imenike pa niso pomembni, ker jih tisti, ki so udeleženi v zavajajočem oglaševanju, ne upoštevajo,
M. whereas the business-directory companies are often established in a Member State other than the victim's, making it difficult for victims to turn to national authorities for protection due to the existence of different interpretations in Member States of what is considered misleading; whereas victims also often find no redress from national legislative frameworks and consumer protection authorities because they are told that the law is intended to protect consumers and not businesses; whereas, being small businesses, most victims often lack the resources to pursue an effective remedy through litigation, and whereas self-regulatory mechanisms for directories are of little relevance as they are disregarded by those that engage in misleading advertising,
N. ker podjetja za imeniške storitve ali njihovi izterjevalci dosledno terjajo plačilo od žrtev takšnega ravnanja; ker se žrtve pritožujejo nad stisko in ogroženostjo zaradi takega pristopa in mnogi pa nazadnje proti svoji volji plačajo, da bi se izognili nadaljnjemu nadlegovanju,
N. whereas victims of these practices are rigorously pursued to pay up by the business-directory companies themselves or even by debt-collection agencies engaged by them; whereas victims complain that they feel distressed and threatened by these approaches and many of them often end up paying unwillingly in order to avoid further harassment,
O. ker so se žrtve, ki zavrnejo plačilo, – z nekaj izjemami – redko znašle pred sodiščem,
O. whereas victims who refuse to pay have – with a few exceptions – seldom been pursued in court,
P. ker je več držav članic sprejelo pobude za obravnavo tega problema, predvsem v povezavi z ozaveščanjem v podjetjih, ki bi lahko bila prizadeta, in ker to vsebuje izmenjavo informacij, svetovanje, obveščanje organov kazenskega pregona in v nekaterih primerih vodenje registra pritožb,
P. whereas a number of Member States have adopted initiatives, notably of an awareness-raising nature, among potentially affected companies and whereas this includes information-sharing, advice, alerting state enforcement authorities and in some cases maintaining a complaints register in order to tackle this problem,
Q. ker je Avstrija po letu 2000 spremenila nacionalni zakon o nepoštenih trgovskih praksah, ki zdaj v oddelku 28a navaja, da je: „v okviru poslovanja in z namenom konkurence prepovedano oglaševati vpis v imenike, kot so rumene strani, telefonski imenik ali podobni seznami, s plačilnim nalogom, nakazilom, fakturo, ponudbo za popravek ali na drug podoben način ali neposredno ponujati tak vpis, ne da bi nedvoumno in tudi z jasnimi grafičnimi sredstvi poudarili, da je tak oglas le ponudba za sklenitev pogodbe“,
Q. whereas Austria has since 2000 changed its national Unfair Commercial Practices Law, and whereas Section 28a thereof now states: “It shall be prohibited to advertise, in the scope of business and for the purpose of competition, for registration in directories, such as yellow pages, telephone directory or similar lists, by way of payment form, money order form, invoice, offer of correction or similar manner or to offer such registrations directly without unequivocally and also by clear and graphic means pointing out that such advertisement is solely an offer for a contract”,
R. ker se take prakse uporabljajo že vrsto let in so zato povzročile veliko število žrtev ter bistveno oškodovale in izkrivile notranji trg,
R. whereas such practices have been applied for a number of years, creating numerous victims and significantly damaging and distorting the internal market,
4. obžaluje, da kljub razširjenosti teh praks zakonodaja EU in nacionalna zakonodaja očitno ne zagotavljata ustrezne zaščite in učinkovitega pravnega varstva ali pa se na nacionalni ravni ne izvajata ustrezno; obžaluje, da očitno tudi nacionalni organi ne morejo zagotoviti pravnega varstva;
Regrets that, despite the widespread nature of these practices, EU and national legislation does not appear to be adequate when it comes to providing a significant means of protection and an effective remedy, or is not being adequately enforced at national level; regrets that national authorities also seem to be unable to provide a remedy;