natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost letne izmenjave najboljših praks z nacionalnimi parlamenti Unije o njihovem izvajanju obveznosti iz soglasja;
Calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of a yearly exchange of best practices with EU national Parliaments about their implementation of the Consensus commitments;
Humanitarna načela, mednarodno humanitarno pravo in zaščita humanitarnega prostora
Humanitarian principles, international humanitarian law and protecting the ‘ humanitarian space ’
14. pozdravlja revizijo smernic Evropske unije o spodbujanju mednarodnega humanitarnega prava iz decembra 2009 in meni, da imajo Komisija in države članice pomembno politično vlogo pri njihovem izvajanju; želi, naj se v Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje uvede mednarodno humanitarno pravo kot predmet specifičnega usposabljanja;
Welcomes the December 2009 review of the EU Guidelines on promoting compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL) and considers that the Commission and the Member States have a major political role to play in their implementation; hopes, also, that specific training in international humanitarian law will be provided at the EEAS;
16. opozarja, da načela in dobra praksa za humanitarno pomoč, sprejeti v juniju 2003, poudarjajo potrebo po sestavljanju računov in rednem opravljanju ocen mednarodnih odzivov na humanitarne krize, vključno z učinkovitostjo donatorjev, ter vztraja, da se o teh ocenah razpravlja na širših posvetovanjih, zlasti med humanitarnimi akterji;
Recalls that the principles and good practices in the field of humanitarian aid adopted in June 2003 emphasise the need to encourage the rendering of accounts and the regular assessment of international responses to humanitarian crises, including the performance of donors, and stresses that these assessments must be the subject of wider consultation, particularly with humanitarian actors;
Skupni okvir za zagotavljanje pomoči
A joint framework for the delivery of aid
· Kakovost pomoči
· The quality of aid
18. opozarja, da je dejansko in stalno združevanje (in, če je mogoče, sodelovanje) uporabnikov pri upravljanju pomoči temeljni pogoj za kakovosten humanitarni odziv, zlasti v primeru dolgotrajnih kriz;
Recalls that genuine and continuous involvement – and if possible participation – of beneficiaries in the management of aid is one of the essential conditions for the quality of humanitarian responses, particularly in the case of long-term crises;
23. spodbuja Komisijo, naj nadaljuje razmišljanje o morebitnem negativnem vplivu humanitarne pomoči na področjih posredovanja, zlasti v zvezi z možno destabilizacijo gospodarskih in socialnih struktur ter posledicami za naravno okolje, ter jo poziva, naj razvija ustrezne strategije, ki bodo omogočale upoštevanje teh vplivov že v fazi nastajanja projektov;
Encourages the Commission to continue its thinking about the potential negative impact of humanitarian aid on the areas where it is provided – particularly the possible destabilisation of economic and social structures and the impact on the natural environment – and calls on it to devise appropriate strategies to make it possible to take this impact into account from the project design stage;
· Raznolikost in kakovost partnerstev
· Diversity and quality of partnerships
· Usklajevanje na mednarodni in evropski ravni
· I nternational and European-level coordination
29. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj določita natančna in pregledna pravila za sodelovanje in usklajevanje med EEAS in Komisijo pri obvladovanju obsežnejših kriz zunaj ozemlja Evropske unije ter naj si aktivno prizadevata za prepoznavnost virov in zmogljivosti, uporabljenih na terenu;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to introduce precise and transparent rules on cooperation and coordination between the EEAS and the Commission in the management of large-scale crises outside the EU; and to work actively regarding EU’s visibility of those resources and capabilities used on the field;
31. ponovno poudarja, da mora razlikovanje med mandati vojaških in humanitarnih dejavnikov ostati povsem nedvoumno, zlasti na območjih, ki so jih prizadele naravne katastrofe ali oboroženi spopadi, in da je bistveno, da se vojaška sredstva in zmogljivosti uporabijo samo v zelo omejenem obsegu ter zgolj v skrajni sili za podporo operacijam humanitarne pomoči v skladu s smernicami OZN (smernice MCDA in smernice iz Osla)
Reaffirms that a very clear distinction needs to be maintained between the remits of military and humanitarian bodies, particularly in areas affected by natural disasters and armed conflicts, and that it is essential for military resources and capabilities to be used only in a very limited number of cases and as a last resort in support of humanitarian aid operations, in accordance with UN guidelines (the MCDA and Oslo guidelines)
S mernice MCDA : smernice o uporabi vojaških sredstev in virov za civilno zaščito v podporo humanitarnim operacijam Združenih narodov v zapletenih izrednih razmerah, marec 2003.
MCDA Guidelines : Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defence Assets to support United Nations Humanitarian Activities in Complex Emergencies, March 2003.
Smernice iz Osla : smernice o uporabi tujih vojaških in civilnih zmogljivosti pri pomoči ob nesrečah; november 2007. ;
Oslo Guidelines : Guidelines on the Use of Foreign Military and Civil Defence Assets in Disaster Relief, November 2007. ;
34. ponovno poudarja, da mora uporaba zmogljivosti civilne zaščite ob humanitarnih krizah temeljiti na potrebah ter se usklajevati s humanitarno pomočjo in jo dopolnjevati, v primeru naravnih nesreč pa lahko te zmogljivosti v določeni meri prispevajo k humanitarnih dejavnostim, če se jih uporabi v skladu z ustreznimi načeli Medagencijskega stalnega odbora (IASC);
Reaffirms that the use of civil protection resources in humanitarian crises must be needs-based and must complement and be consistent with humanitarian aid, and points out that, in the case of natural disasters, such resources can make a certain contribution to humanitarian action, if employed in line with Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) principles on the subject;
36. meni, da bi evropska civilna zaščita lahko pomenila obvezo nekaterih držav članic, da dajo prostovoljno na voljo osnovne module civilne zaščite, vnaprej določene in takoj pripravljene za posredovanje Unije, v koordinaciji centra za nadzor in informiranje (MIC, Monitoring and Information Centre), ter meni, da bi večina teh modulov, ki so že na voljo na nacionalni ravni, ostala pod njihovim nadzorom, ter da bi uporaba teh modulov "v pripravljenosti" predstavljala temelj civilne zaščite Unije pri odzivanju na nesreče znotraj in zunaj njenih meja;
Considers that the European civil protection force could comprise a commitment by certain Member States to voluntarily make available predetermined essential civil protection modules, which would be ready to intervene immediately for EU operations coordinated by the Monitoring and Information Centre (MIC), and also considers that most of these modules, which are already available at national level, would remain under their control and that the deployment of these modules on a standby basis would form the nucleus of the EU’s civil protection to respond to disasters outside and inside the EU;
Kontinuiteta pomoči
Continuity of aid
37. pozdravlja sprejetje nove evropske strategije za podporo zmanjševanju tveganja nesreč v državah v razvoju, sprejete februarja 2009; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj z nacionalnimi vladami, lokalnimi oblastmi ter organizacijami civilne družbe v državah prejemnicah razvija programe za preprečevanje nesreč in upravljanje odziva nanje, ter poziva k hitremu izvajanju omenjene strategije;
Welcomes the adoption in February 2009 of a new European strategy to support disaster risk reduction in developing countries; urges the Commission in this respect to develop disaster prevention and response management capacity programmes with national governments, local authorities and civil society organisations in beneficiary countries and calls for the strategy to be implemented swiftly;
· Povezava med takojšnjo pomočjo, rehabilitacijo in razvojem
· Linking emergency aid, rehabilitation and development
44. poziva k boljšemu dialogu in usklajevanju med humanitarnimi organizacijami, razvojnimi agencijami na krajih ukrepanja ter pristojnimi službami evropskih institucij in držav članic;
Advocates enhanced dialogue and coordination among humanitarian organisations and development agencies both in the field and in the relevant departments of the EU and Member State institutions;
Evropska unija, vključno z Evropsko komisijo in državami članicami, je največja donatorka humanitarne pomoči na svetu.
The European Union, through the Commission and the Member States combined, is the world’s largest donor of humanitarian aid.
Njen prispevek predstavlja več kot 40% uradne mednarodne humanitarne pomoči.
Its contribution represents more than 40% of all official international humanitarian assistance.
Prek svojega Generalnega direktorata za humanitarno pomoč (GD ECHO) je Komisija v letu 2009 zagotovila humanitarno pomoč za približno 115 milijonov ljudi v več kot 70 državah, skupna vrednost te pomoči pa je znašala 950 milijonov evrov.
In 2009, via its directorate-general for humanitarian aid (DG ECHO), the Commission provided a total of EUR 950 million to approximately 115 million people in more than 70 countries.
S svojo humanitarno politiko Evropska unija konkretno dokazuje svojo zavezo, da bo pomagala ljudem iz tretjih držav, ki potrebujejo pomoč v primerih skrajne ranljivosti.
The Union ’ s humanitarian policy is the practical expression of its commitment to supporting people in third countries in need of assistance when they are at their most vulnerable.
Soglasje poudarja zavezo Evropske unije k tesnemu sodelovanju na tem področju, da bi povečala svojo učinkovitost, branila in spodbujala temeljna humanitarna načela človečnosti, nevtralnosti, nepristranskosti in neodvisnosti ter odločno zagovarjala spoštovanje mednarodnega humanitarnega prava.
The Consensus underscores the will of the EU to cooperate closely in this field in order to be as effective as possible, to defend and promote the basic humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence and actively to advocate the observance of international humanitarian law.
Obveze iz soglasja veljajo za države članice in Komisijo.
The commitments that follow from the Consensus apply to both the Member States and the Commission.
Da bi se spodbudilo izvajanje humanitarnega soglasja, je bil maja leta 2008 pripravljen in sprejet akcijski načrt za petletno obdobje.
In order to promote implementation of the Consensus, a five-year action plan was drawn up and was adopted in May 2008.
Ukrep št. 33 tega načrta izrecno določa, da je treba opraviti vmesni pregled akcijskega načrta, ta pa je tudi predmet tega poročila.
Action no 33 in the action plan specifically provides for a mid-term review – which is the subject of this report.
Predvsem je treba omeniti, da ta analiza ni lahka zaradi pomanjkanja specifičnih informacij o ukrepih, ki so bili izvedeni ali ki jih je treba izvesti.
It should be noted at the outset that, for want of specific information about actions undertaken or yet to be taken, this stock-taking exercise is not easy.
Analiza rezultatov akcijskega načrta je pomanjkljiva tudi zaradi odsotnosti posebnih kazalnikov v nekaterih sektorjih.
A further problem in analysing the results of the action plan is the absence of specific indicators in certain sectors.
Prav tako smo med pripravo tega poročila dobili vtis, da je humanitarno soglasje zunaj kroga humanitarnih partnerjev še vedno premalo znano, da je treba vložiti veliko truda za krepitev njegove prepoznavnosti ter da je treba izboljšati njegovo poznavanje v državah članicah, drugih institucijah in med vojaškimi akterji.
In the course of preparing the report we also realised that, outside the bodies involved in humanitarian work, there is still little awareness of the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid and that a major effort is therefore required to raise the profile of the Consensus and make the Member States, other institutions and military bodies more familiar with it.
Poleg formalnosti nam to poročilo omogoča, da ponovno preučimo ustreznost humanitarne pomoči in bistvene točke soglasja, ki se nam zdijo temeljnega pomena.
This report is not only a formal exercise but also an opportunity to reflect on humanitarian aid today and on key points in the Consensus which we consider to be fundamentally important.
· Evropsko soglasje v kontekstu popolnih sprememb
· The European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid in a context of profound change
Področje humanitarnih dejavnosti se je v zadnjih letih temeljito spremenilo, zaradi česar je še bolj pomembno strogo in okrepljeno izvajanje humanitarnega soglasja.
The humanitarian context has changed profoundly in recent years, making it all the more important that the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid be applied rigorously and energetically.
Glede na spreminjajoče se okolje je treba najprej omeniti znatno povečanje števila in intenzivnosti naravnih nesreč, predvsem zaradi vpliva podnebnih sprememb.
In this changing context, the first factor to highlight is the significant increase in the number and severity of natural disasters caused, particularly, by the impact of climate change.
Zato je treba okrepiti prizadevanja za zmanjševanje tveganja naravnih nesreč in za zagotavljanje – poleg takojšnje pomoči – podpore lastnim zmogljivostim skupnosti za pripravo na nesreče.
This implies a need to invest greater efforts in disaster risk reduction and to provide support – in addition to one-off aid – for communities’ own disaster-preparedness capabilities.
Politične zaveze obstajajo – strategija EU v tej smeri in hjoški akcijski načrt – vendar še vedno obstajajo vrzeli v izvajanju.
Political undertakings to this effect have been made – in the form of the EU strategy and the Hyogo action plan – but their implementation remains incomplete.
Gre za popolno vključitev zmanjševanja tveganja nesreč v politike razvojne in humanitarne pomoči.
Disaster risk reduction needs to be fully integrated into policies for development aid and humanitarian aid.
K temu je treba dodati povečanje števila zapletenih kriz, zlasti notranjih konfliktov in njihove spreminjajoče se narave, saj konflikte pogosto spremlja množično preseljevanje prebivalstva (begunci, notranje razseljene osebe) in povečanje nasilja nad prebivalstvom.
Further factors are the increasing incidence of complex crises, especially internal conflicts, and the changing nature of conflicts, many of which entail the displacement of huge numbers of people (refugees and internally displaced persons), as well as increased violence against civilians.
Čedalje več je kršitev mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, razmere na terenu pa so čedalje slabše.
Violations of international humanitarian law are increasingly common and the situation in the field is deteriorating.
Pri kršitvah mednarodnega humanitarnega prava je zlasti pretresljivo dejstvo, da se spolno nasilje vedno bolj pogosto uporablja kot vojno orožje.
One particularly shocking aspect of such violations is the increasing use of sexual violence as a weapon of war.
Potrebno se je osredotočiti na vključevanje načela enakosti spolov in si prizadevati za zaščito pred spolnim nasiljem v okviru humanitarne dejavnosti.
Major efforts ought to be focused on incorporating gender and protection against sexual violence into humanitarian responses.
Poleg tega so zmožnosti humanitarnih akterjev za dostop do prebivalstva v kriznih razmerah mnogokrat oslabljene, na žalost pa je tudi opaziti veliko krčenje prostora za humanitarno dejavnost.
There are also cases where humanitarian organisations’ access to people in crisis situations is impeded, and the general trend towards erosion of the ‘humanitarian space’ is to be deplored.
Odločno si je treba prizadevati za neprestano varovanje prostora za humanitarno dejavnost.
We must continue doggedly to argue for the preservation of that ‘humanitarian space’.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti najbolj ranljivim skupinam, kot so ženske, otroci in nasilno razseljene osebe (notranje razseljene osebe in begunci).
More specific attention should be directed at the most vulnerable groups of people, including women, children and people who have been forcibly displaced (whether internally or as refugees).
Po podatkih Visokega komisariata Združenih narodov za begunce je bilo v svetu konec leta 2009 kar 43,3 milijona ljudi, prisiljenih k selitvi.
At the end of 2009, according to the UN High Commission for Refugees, there were 43.3 million forcibly displaced persons throughout the world.
Poleg tega po podatkih UNICEF zaradi podhranjenosti in oboroženih konfliktov vsak dan umre več kot 22 000 otrok, mlajših od 5 let, v svetu pa je več kot 1 milijon sirot in otrok, ki so ločeni od svojih družin.
In addition, UNICEF estimates that more than 22 000 children under the age of five die every day as the result of malnutrition and war, and there are more than a million orphans and children separated from their families.
Prav tako je v zadnjih letih mogoče opaziti vedno večje vključevanje nehumanitarnih dejavnikov (vojska, civilna zaščita itd.) v odzive na humanitarne krize.
Recent years have also seen non-humanitarian (e.g. military and civil protection) bodies increasingly involved in the response to humanitarian crises.
Čeprav je to sodelovanje lahko pozitivno v primerih naravnih nesreč velikih razsežnosti, lahko v primeru zapletenih kriz povzroči težave, saj obstaja precejšnja nevarnost prepletanja humanitarnih in političnih ciljev.
While such involvement may be positive in the case of responses to large-scale natural disasters, it can cause problems in the case of complex crises where there is a major risk that political and humanitarian agendas will be confused.
Vendar je civilno-vojaško sodelovanje postalo neizpodbitno, zlasti s širjenjem „integriranih misij“ v okviru Združenih narodov, katerih cilj je izvajanje globalne strategije.
Nonetheless, the civil-military link has become an unavoidable reality, particularly with the increasing number of ‘integrated missions’ under the auspices of the UN, which is concerned with implementing a global strategy.
To mešanje vlog med vojaškimi in humanitarnimi dejavniki prispeva k vse večji negotovosti humanitarnih delavcev in prizadetega prebivalstva.
The confusion of roles between armed forces and humanitarian organisations makes for increasing insecurity on the part of both humanitarian personnel and the populations affected.
Bistveno je, da se politični, vojaški ali humanitarni dejavniki, ki delujejo v istem delovnem okolju, bolje spoznajo in vzdržujejo dia log, spoštujejo vloge in mandate drug drugega ter si ne škodujejo.
It is essential that political bodies and military or humanitarian organisations active in the same working environment should learn more about one another and engage in dialogue, while having regard to – and not compromising – their respective roles and remits.
Nedavne humanitarne katastrofe na Haitiju in v Pakistanu so znova dokazale, da je treba okrepiti zmogljivosti EU za odzivanje na elementarne nesreče z vidika učinkovitosti, usklajenosti in prepoznavnosti.
The recent humanitarian disasters in Haiti and Pakistan demonstrated once again the need to improve the EU’s disaster-response capability in terms of effectiveness, coordination and visibility.
Zato poročilo poziva tudi k oblikovanju evropskih zmogljivosti za hitro odzivanje (evropske enote civilne zaščite); gre za idejo, ki jo je sprožil Michel Barnier po cunamiju v Aziji in ki jo je večkrat ponovil Evropski parlament.
The report therefore advocates the establishment of a European rapid response capability (European civil protection force), a concept launched by Michel Barnier following the 2004 tsunami in south-east Asia and repeatedly urged by Parliament.
To bi morala biti optimizacija razpoložljivih mehanizmov, da bi se povečali učinkovitost in prepoznavnost, pri čemer je cilj, da se z boljšim usklajevanjem doseže takojšnjo mobilizacijo vseh potrebnih sredstev.
This capability should constitute an optimisation of the tools already available, which would become more effective and visible, the aim being to enable, through closer coordination, the immediate mobilisation of all necessary resources.
· Razvoj institucionalnega humanitarnega okvira na evropski ravni
· The changing institutional context of humanitarian work at European level
Od sprejetja akcijskega načrta je v Evropski uniji večkrat prišlo do institucionalnih sprememb, na primer z ustanovitvijo v začetku leta 2009 delovne skupine za humanitarno pomoč in pomoč v hrani v svetu Evropske unije (Cohafa).
Since the action plan was adopted a number of institutional changes have taken place at EU level, including, for example, the establishment in early 2009 of the Council’s Working Party on Humanitarian Aid and Food Aid (COHAFA).
Cohafa je z rednimi izmenjavami mnenj na politični ravni postala pomemben forum in dodatno sredstvo za krepitev institucionalne strukture evropske humanitarne politike.
COHAFA has become a useful forum and an additional tool, strengthening the institutional structure of European humanitarian policy through regular exchanges at political level.
Vendar pa je njeno vlogo treba okrepiti pri uporabi načel in najboljših praks, humanitarnega usklajevanja in izvajanja soglasja.
Its role ought to be reinforced, however, with regard to application of humanitarian principles and good practices as well as coordination and implementation of the Consensus.
Opažamo tudi združitev virov civilne zaščite in humanitarne pomoči v GD ECHO, ki bodo pomagali krepiti splošno koordinacijo in skladnost instrumentov za krizno upravljanje nesreč.
Also noteworthy is the linkage of the civil protection and humanitarian aid portfolios in DG ECHO, a development which will make for closer coordination and better overall consistency in the use of crisis-management tools in response to disasters.
Čeprav poročevalka pozdravlja takšno približevanje, je treba ohraniti jasno razmejitev vlog, pooblastil in proračunskih postavk teh različnih instrumentov, da bi se ohranile njihove identiteta in posebnosti.
While the rapporteur welcomes the linkage, it is nonetheless necessary to maintain a clear demarcation of the roles, remits and budget lines of the respective instruments, in order to preserve their individual identities and specific features.
Uredba Sveta o humanitarni pomoči (ES) št. 1257/96, ki je začela veljati leta 1996, bo v času revizije po postopku soodločanja dobila ustrezno pravno podlago.
Thus, when Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid is revised under the codecision procedure it will have its own legal basis.
Lizbonska pogodba je uvedla tudi evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, o njenem izvajanju pa je v letu 2010 potekalo veliko razprav.
The Lisbon Treaty also provided for the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS), and establishing the service has been the subject of much discussion throughout 2010.
Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za razvoj je med pogajanji zagovarjal neodvisnosti ECHO, tako da ta ni del EEAS, da bi se izognili morebitnim manipulacijam humanitarne pomoči.
During these negotiations, Parliament’s Committee on Development has been concerned to defend the independence of DG ECHO, preventing it from becoming part of the EEAS and thus avoiding any possible instrumentalisation of humanitarian aid.
V tem kontekstu je treba pojasniti delitev nalog med visoko predstavnico EU Catherine Ashton in evropsko komisarko za mednarodno sodelovanje, humanitarno pomoč in krizno odzivanje Kristalino Georgijevo.
In this specific context, the division of tasks between Catherine Ashton, Vice-President of the Commission/ High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and Kristalina Georgieva, the Commissioner responsible for international cooperation, humanitarian aid and crisis response, must be clarified.
· Izzivi in pot naprej
· Challenges and the way ahead