natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(m) za vse dejavnosti profiliranja bi bilo treba vzpostaviti vrsto meril za ocenjevanje učinkovitosti, legitimnosti in skladnosti z vrednotami Evropske unije; treba je pregledati obstoječo in predlagano nacionalno in evropsko zakonodajo na področju uporabe profiliranja, da bi se prepričali, da izpolnjuje pravne zahteve zakonodaje Evropske unije in mednarodnih pogodb; treba je razmisliti o zakonodajni reformi EU, da bi oblikovali obvezujoča pravila, s katerimi bi se izognili kršitvam temeljnih pravic, ob upoštevanju pričakovanega priporočila Sveta Evrope o profiliranju;
(m) a set of criteria should be established for assessing the effectiveness, legitimacy and consistency with European Union values of all profiling activities; existing and proposed national and EU legislation relating to the use of profiling should be reviewed in order to ascertain that it meets legal requirements under European law and international treaties; and EU law reform should be considered if necessary, to produce binding rules which avoid any infringement of fundamental rights taking into account the anticipated Council of Europe recommendation on profiling;
(n) treba bi bilo pregledati obseg, v katerem direktiva 2000/43/ES prepoveduje ali ureja ukrepe in prakse o profiliranju, ter preučiti reformo, da bi se izključitev letališč in pristanišč črtala iz področja uporabe direktive;
(n) there should be an examination of the extent to which Directive 2000/43/EC prohibits or regulates profiling measures and practices, and consideration of reform to remove the exclusion of airports and ports from its scope;
(o) Svet bi moral naročiti študijo na podlagi ustreznega okvira in sedanjih praks, za pripravo bi bila odgovorna Komisija, ob posvetovanju z agencijo za temeljne pravice in evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, kakor bi bilo primerno, ter ob posvetovanju z organi kazenskega pregona in obveščevalnimi službami, študija pa bi obsegala dejansko in morebitno uporabo tehnik profiliranja, njihovo učinkovitost pri identificiranju osumljencev in skladnost z državljanskimi svoboščinami, človekovimi pravicami in zahtevami glede zasebnosti; države članice bi bilo treba pozvati, naj predložijo podatke o prijetju in preiskovanju ter drugih ukrepih, ki izhajajo iz tehnik profiliranja;
(o) the Council should commission a study, based on the relevant framework and current practices, to be conducted under the responsibility of the Commission, with the consultation of the Fundamental Rights Agency and the European Data Protection Supervisor, as appropriate, and in consultation with law enforcement and with intelligence agencies, covering the actual and potential application of profiling techniques, their effectiveness in identifying suspects and their compatibility with civil liberties, human rights and privacy requirements; Member States should be asked to supply figures on stop-and-search and other interventions which result from profiling techniques;
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA ( B6‑0483/2007 )
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION ( B6‑0483/2007 )
v skladu s členom 114(1) Poslovnika
under Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure
ki ga predlaga Sarah Ludford
by Sarah Ludford
o problematiki profiliranja, zlasti na podlagi narodnosti in rase, pri protiterorističnih dejavnostih, izvrševanju predpisov, priseljevanju, carinskem in mejnem nadzoru
on the problem of profiling, notably on the basis of ethnicity and race, in counter-terrorism, law enforcement, immigration, customs and border control
- ob upoštevanju mednarodnih, evropskih in nacionalnih instrumentov za človekove pravice, kot sta Evropska konvencija o človekovih pravicah in Listina o temeljnih pravicah, ter ob upoštevanju pravic in zagotovil, ki jih imajo posamezniki na področju zasebnosti, varstva podatkov in nediskriminacije, in s tem povezane sodne prakse,
- having regard to international, European and national human rights instruments, such as the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and having regard to the rights and guarantees provided to individuals in the field of privacy, data protection and non-discrimination, as well as the related case law,
- ob upoštevanju evropskih instrumentov na področju boja proti terorizmu, vključno s policijskim in pravosodnim sodelovanjem in izmenjavo podatkov in obveščevalnih podatkov med državami članicami, kot so Sklep Sveta 2005/671/PNZ o izmenjavi informacij in sodelovanju na področju terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, Okvirni sklep Sveta 2006/960/PNZ o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona držav članic Evropske unije, zlasti kar zadeva huda kazniva dejanja in teroristična dejanja, ter Sklepa Sveta o okrepitvi čezmejnega sodelovanja, zlasti na področju boja proti terorizmu, čezmejnemu kriminalu in nezakonitemu preseljevanju (vključitev Prümske pogodbe v pravni red Unije),
- having regard to European instruments in the field of the fight against terrorism, including police and judicial cooperation and exchange of information and intelligence between Member States, such as Council Decision 2005/671/JHA on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences, Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union, in particular as regards serious offences including terrorist acts, and the Council Decision on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (Integration of the Prüm Treaty into the Union Legal Order),
- ob upoštevanju sporazuma med EU in ZDA in predloga Evropske komisije o uporabi evidence podatkov o potnikih ( KOM(2007)0654 ),
- having regard to the EU-US PNR Agreement and the Commission's EU PNR proposal ( COM(2007)0654 ),
- ob upoštevanju jamstev o varstvu podatkov, zlasti direktive 95/46/ES o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov in predloga okvirnega sklepa Sveta o zaščiti osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah,
- having regard to data protection guarantees, in particular Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data, and the proposed Council Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters,
- ob upoštevanju protidiskriminacijske politike EU, zlasti direktive 2000/43/ES o rasni enakopravnosti in direktive 2000/78/ES o enakopravnosti pri zaposlovanju,
- having regard to the EU anti-discrimination policies, and notably to Race Equality Directive 2000/43/EC and Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC,
- ob upoštevanju člena 114(1) svojega poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 114(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
A. ker se zaveda, da je učinkovitost sodelovanja med organi kazenskega pregona pri boju proti kaznivim dejanjem in terorizmu v veliki meri odvisna od njihove sposobnosti pravočasnega pridobivanja in izmenjave podatkov in obveščevalnih podatkov,
A. recognising that the effectiveness of cooperation between law enforcement authorities in combating crime and terrorism depends to a large extent on their ability to obtain and exchange information and intelligence in good time,
B. ker so podatki o narodnosti, veri in državi porekla občutljivi osebni podatki, ki jih evropski predpisi strogo varujejo, vendar prav ti podatki včasih veljajo za pomembne v kazenskih preiskavah in pri preprečevanju terorizma, medtem ko raziskave nevladnih organizacij nakazujejo, da je profiliranje na področju kazenskega pregona in policijskega dela vedno bolj razširjeno, usmerjeno pa je na specifične narodnostne, rasne in verske skupine, pa tudi na protestnike in ljudi, ki potujejo,
B. whereas data on ethnicity, religion and national origin is sensitive personal data that is strictly protected under European regulations, but this information is sometimes considered relevant to criminal investigations and prevention of terrorism, and research by NGOs suggests that profiling is growing as a practice in the field of law enforcement and policing, targeting specific ethnic, race and religious groups, as well as protestors and travellers,
C. ker se zaveda, da je prizadevanje za pridobivanje podatkov v skupnostih bistveno za uspešen boj proti kaznivim dejanjem in terorizmu in ga pomanjkanje zaupanja v organe kazenskega pregona, še zlasti strah pred diskriminacijo, lahko resno ogrozita,
C. conscious that the effort to acquire information from communities that is vital to success in combating crime and terrorism can be seriously undermined by a lack of trust in law enforcement, and in particular the fear of a discriminatory impact,
D. ker je posledično zaskrbljen, da bi predlog Komisije za sistem podatkov o potnikih Evropske unije (PNR), namenjen zbiranju osebnih podatkov o potnikih, ki potujejo v EU, lahko služil kot podlaga za profiliranje, tudi na podlagi rase ali narodnosti, saj predvideva „preverjanje evidence podatkov o potnikih za skupek lastnosti in vedenjskih značilnosti z namenom presoje tveganja“ in navaja, da „ko je za potnika ocenjena določena stopnja tveganja, se ga lahko označi za potnika z visokim tveganjem“,
D. concerned, therefore, that the Commission's proposal for an EU PNR system providing for the collection of personal data of passengers travelling to the EU could provide a basis for profiling, including on the basis of race or ethnicity, since it envisages 'running the PNR data of passengers against a combination of characteristics and behavioural patterns, aimed at creating a risk-assessment' and states that 'when a passenger fits within a certain risk-assessment, then he could be identified as a high-risk passenger',
E. ker je zaskrbljen, da so nekatere države članice in Komisija naznanile načrte, da bodo zbirale in hranile podatke o potnikih, ki vstopajo ali odhajajo, kar prav tako lahko vodi do izdelave profilov na podlagi občutljivih osebnih podatkov,
E. concerned that some Member States and the Commission have announced plans to collect and retain data concerning travellers entering or leaving, which may also lead to the creation of profiles based on personal, including sensitive, data,
F. ker mreža neodvisnih strokovnjakov za temeljne pravice v svojem mnenju št. 4/2006 navaja, da mora narodnostno ali rasno profiliranje v vsakršnih okoliščinah veljati za nezakonito,
F. whereas the Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights advises in its Opinion 4/ 2006 that ethnic or racial profiling should be considered unlawful under any circumstances,
G. ker je v pravu in politikah glede varnosti in kazenskega pregona bistveno spoštovati človekove pravice in svoboščine, kot sta pravica do zasebnosti in prepoved diskriminacije,
G. whereas it is essential to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms, such as the right to privacy and the prohibition of discrimination, in laws and policies on security and law enforcement,
H. ker obžaluje, da še vedno niso bili ustrezno obravnavani večkrat izraženi pomisleki Parlamenta v zvezi z rasnim, narodnostnim in vedenjskim profiliranjem v okviru varstva podatkov, sodelovanja pri kazenskem pregonu, izmenjave podatkov in obveščevalnih podatkov, pri varnosti v letalstvu in prometu, priseljevanju in nadzorovanju mej ter protidiskriminacijskih ukrepih, da bi dosegli sporazum o legitimni praksi in bi se opredelile pravne praznine,
H. regretting that repeated concerns raised by Parliament in connection with racial, ethnic and behavioural profiling in the context of data protection, law enforcement cooperation, exchange of data and intelligence, aviation and transport security, immigration and border management and anti-discrimination measures have not so far been adequately addressed in order to reach agreement on legitimate practice and identify any legal gaps,
(a) dejavnosti kazenskega pregona se morajo vedno izvajati ob ustreznem upoštevanju varstva podatkov, temeljnih pravic in načela nediskriminacije;
(a) law enforcement must always be conducted with due respect for data protection, fundamental rights and the principle of non-discrimination;
(b) trenutne prakse kazenskega pregona in varnostnih dejavnosti, katerih del so rasno, narodnostno in vedenjsko profiliranje in ocena tveganja, je treba raziskati, analizirati in o njih politično razpravljati, utemeljitve za to početje in njegove prednosti pa primerjati s škodljivimi posledicami;
(b) current law enforcement and security practices which entail racial, ethnic and behavioural profiling and risk assessment should be subjected to research, analysis and political discussion, with the justification and benefits weighed against the harm from these practices;
(c) obstoječe zakone je treba preučiti z vidika obravnavanja profiliranja ter po potrebi preučiti reformo zakonodaje, ki bo zagotovila, da zaradi njega ne prihaja do diskriminacije;
(c) existing laws should be examined for the scope they give for profiling, and consideration given to law reform if necessary to ensure that discriminatory impact is avoided;
(d) treba je jasno opredeliti zakonito in nezakonito rabo občutljivih osebnih podatkov na področju varnosti in spodbujati sodelovanje med ustreznimi varnostnimi agencijami pri razumevanju in obravnavanju profiliranja, hkrati pa pri teh prizadevanjih delovati skupaj z ustreznimi skupnostmi;
(d) there is a need to establish a clear definition of legitimate versus illegal uses of sensitive personal data in the security field and to encourage greater cooperation between relevant security agencies in understanding and addressing profiling, and working with relevant communities in this effort;
5. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi poročilo o obstoječi nacionalni in evropski zakonodaji na področju uporabe profiliranja in se tako prepriča, da izpolnjuje pravne zahteve zakonodaje Evropske unije in mednarodnih pogodb; poziva Komisijo, naj naroči poglobljeno študijo v zvezi s preiskovalnimi postopki v Evropski uniji, da bi tako ovrednotili vrednost profiliranja in tveganje za njegovo zlorabo.
Calls on the Commission to commission a review of existing national and European legislation relating to the use of profiling, in order to ascertain that it meets legal requirements under EU law and international treaties; calls on the Commission to commission an in-depth study with regard to investigative practices in the European Union, in order to assess the value of, and the risk of misuse associated with, profiling.
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov glede tržnih standardov za perutninsko meso
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets as regards the marketing standards for poultrymeat
absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta za zavrnitev ali spremembo skupnega stališča
majority of Parliament ' s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta, razen v primerih, navedenih v členih 105, 107, 161 in 300 Pogodbe ES in členu 7 Pogodbe EU
majority of Parliament ' s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
OBRAZLOŽITVENI MEMORANDUM..................................................................................10
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................10
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2008)0336 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2008)0336 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0247/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0247/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in mnenja Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane (A6–0000/2009),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0223/2009 ),
(5) Izključni sklic na obdelavo s hladom v opredelitvi " perutninsko meso " je preveč omejevalen glede na tehnološki razvoj.
(5) The exclusive reference to cold treatment in the definition of ' poultrymeat ' is too restrictive in view of technological developments.
Zato je treba to opredelitev spremeniti.
That definition should therefore be adapted.
S predlogom Komisije se želi spremeniti opredelitev za perutninsko meso, da bi se dovolila prodaja tega mesa, ki je bilo protimikrobno obdelano zato, da bi se odpravila površinska kontaminacija trupov perutnine.
The Commission proposal aims at altering the definition of poultrymeat with a view to authorising the marketing of such meat where it has received anti-microbe treatment against the surface contamination of poultry carcasses.
Evropski parlament je 16. junija 2008 sprejel resolucijo, v kateri je izrazil svojo zaskrbljenost, ker tak predlog ne ustreza zahtevam evropskih državljanov o varnosti in higieni živil.
On 16 June 2008, Parliament adopted a resolution expressing its concern at this measure, since the proposal does not meet the requirements of EU citizens as regards food hygiene and safety.
(6a) Obvezna navedba porekla ali izvora mesa omogoča potrošniku ozaveščeno izbiro.
(6a) Compulsory indication of the origin or source of the meat enables consumers to make a properly informed choice.
Nedavna študija kaže, da tri četrtine evropskih potrošnikov meni, da je označba in zlasti navedba izvora prednostni element pri odločitvi o nakupu proizvoda.
A recent study has suggested that 75% of consumers in the EU respond to the labelling of a product, and in particular the denomination of origin, as a crucial factor when deciding whether to buy.
(6b) Da se potrošnikom zagotovijo najboljše informacije, bi bilo treba pri označevanju vseh proizvodov perutninskega mesa obvezno navesti datum zakola živali.
(6b) So as to provide optimal information to consumers, indicating the date of slaughter of the bird should be mandatory where the labelling of all poultrymeat products is concerned.
V skladu z obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti, katere cilj ni zavajanje potrošnikov, se bodo z obvezno oznako datuma zakola na vseh proizvodih perutninskega mesa potrošniku zagotovile najboljše informacije, s katerimi lahko oceni, kako svež je proizvod.
In line with existing Community legislation where the goal is not to mislead the consumer, the mandatory marking of the date of slaughter on all poultrymeat products will serve to provide consumers with optimal information so as to determine the ' freshness ' of a product.
Priloga XIV – del B – del II – točka 1
Annex XIV – part B — part II —point 1
1."perutninsko meso": podobne užitne dele perutnine z oznako KN 0105.
1. 'poultrymeat' means the edible parts of farmed birds falling within CN code 0105 .
1. "perutninsko meso" pomeni perutninsko meso, primerno za prehrano ljudi, ki ni bilo obdelano drugače kot s hladom.
1. 'poultrymeat' means poultrymeat which is suitable for human consumption and has undergone no treatment other than refrigeration .
Priloga XIV – del B – del II – točka 2
Annex XIV – part B – part II – point 2
2. "sveže perutninsko meso" pomeni perutninsko meso, ki ni otrdelo zaradi postopka hlajenja preden se je stalno hranilo na temperaturi nad – 2 °C in pod 4 °C; vendar pa lahko države članice za krajše obdobje popravijo različne temperaturne zahteve za razsek in skladiščenje svežega perutninskega mesa v maloprodajnih trgovinah ali obratih neposredno ob prodajnih mestih, kjer se razsek in skladiščenje izvajata le za namene oskrbe potrošnikov neposredno na kraju samem.
2. 'fresh poultrymeat' means poultrymeat which has not been stiffened at any time by the cooling process prior to being kept at a temperature not below -2°C and not higher than +4°C. However, Member States may lay down different temperature requirements for a short period for the cutting and storage of fresh poultrymeat performed in retail shops or in premises adjacent to sales points, where the cutting and storage are performed solely for the purpose of supplying the consumer directly on the spot.
Navedba datuma zakola mora biti obvezna na vseh proizvodi h perutninskega mesa.
The date of slaughter of a product should be mandatory for all poult r ymea t products.
S tem lahko potrošnik ozaveščeno presodi, katero meso je dejansko sveže.
If provided with the date of slaughter, the consumer is able to make an informed choice of what can realistically be deemed as fresh.
Poleg določil Komisije v njenem predlogu je treba označevanje proizvodov perutninskega mesa razumeti kot dopolnjevanje predlagane opredelitve Komisije v prilogi, del II, odstavek 2.
In addition to what is set out by the Commission in its proposal, date of slaughter labelling on a poultrymeat product should be seen as complementary to the Commission ' s proposed definition in the Annex, Part II, paragraph 2.
Tehnologije, ki se jih uporablja, kot je temperiranje, vključujejo hlajenje mesa za razrez (na primer za ražnjiče in majhne zrezke) oziroma mletje (na primer za sesekljane zrezke).
Existing technologies which have to be used, such as tempering, involve stiffening the meat with a view to its being cut (as with kebabs or cutlets) or shaped (as with hamburgers).
Glede na to mesnih pripravkov, čeprav so iz mesa, ki ni bilo nikoli zamrznjeno ali globoko zamrznjeno, ne bi bilo več mogoče opredeliti kot " sveže " , saj je bilo meso obdelano s postopkom hlajenja.
On this basis, meat preparations, even where obtained from meat which has never been frozen or deep-frozen, could no longer be classified as ' fresh ' from the fact of having been stiffened.
Priloga – točka 3 a (novo)
Annex – point 3 a (new)
Priloga XIV – del B – del III a (novo)
Annex XIV– part B – part III a (new)
Ime živila na etiketi katerega koli proizvoda iz perutninskega mesa vključuje navedbo:
The name of the food in the labelling of any poultrymeat product shall include an indication of:
a) vseh dodanih sestavin drugačnega živalskega izvora od preostalega mesa in
(a) any added ingredient of a different animal origin to the rest of the meat; and
b) dodano vodo, ki predstavlja več kot 5 % teže proizvoda."
(b) any added water making up more than 5 % of the weight of the product "
Določbe za označevanje pri trženju mesa goveda starega 12 ali manj mesecev so bile že vključene v uredbo 1234/2007 (glej Prilogo XIa- del IV).
Concerning the marketing of meat of bovine animals aged 12 months or less, labelling provisions have already been added to Regulation 1234/2007 (see Annex XIa - part IV).
Tudi za perutnino je treba uvesti določbe za označevanje, saj ni neobičajno, da se različnim vrstam dodajajo voda ali živalski dodatki (kot so hidrolizriana govedina ali prašičje beljakovine).
As for poultry, it is necessary to also include labelling provisions, as it is not unusual to add water or animal ingredients of a different species (such as hydrolysed beef or pork proteins) to meat, e.g. to chicken breast.
Da bi se izognili zavajanju potrošnikov in da bi se jim ponudila možnost, da se odločijo, da ne bodo kupili teh proizvodov (na primer zaradi verskega prepričanja) je bistveno, da se ta praksa objavi.
In order not to mislead the consumers and in order to give them the possibility to avoid such products (e.g. on religious grounds), is essential that such practices are declared.
Ta določba je zakonsko že veljavna v Veliki Britaniji in bo zagotovila, da bo ime proizvoda odražalo njegove prave lastnosti, tako da bodo potrošniki ustrezno obveščeni in ne bo zavajanja pri oznakah na primer med piščančjim prsnim filejem in piščančjim prsnim filejem z dodano vodo.
This provision is already effective law in the UK and shall ensure that the name of the food reflects its true nature, so that consumers are accurately informed and not misled (e.g. 'chicken breast fillet' versus 'chicken breast fillet with added water').
Priloga – točka 3 b (novo)
Annex – point 3 b (new)
Priloga XIV – del B – del III b (novo)
Annex XIV– part B – part III b (new)