natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V svojem sporočilu za Evropski parlament in Svet z naslovom „Evropske agencije – smernice za prihodnost“ " [ KOM(2008)0135 končno, Bruselj z dne 11. marca 2008] je Komisija sama priznala, da je treba „jasno opredeliti vlogo in mehanizme delovanja teh javnih organov, da se tako zagotovi njihova odgovornost“.
The Commission itself in its communication to the European Parliament and the Council 'European agencies – the way forward' (COM(2008)135 final, Brussels, 11 March 2008) recognises the need 'to have clarity about their role, and about the mechanisms to ensure the accountability of these public bodies' (page 2).
Treba je določiti minimalna skupna pravila in načela glede upravnih struktur, delovanja in nadzora regulativnih agencij, da bi te lahko usklajeno sprejele temeljna načela, ki izhajajo iz pogodb.
What is required is a minimum total of common principles and rules relating to the structure, operation and control of the regulatory agencies so that they integrate harmoniously within the framework of fundamental principles which derive from the Treaties.
Obstaja več različnih upravnih struktur.
There is in fact a multiplicity of structures.
Upravni odbor je običajno sestavljen najmanj iz enega predstavnika iz vsake države članice, izvršnega direktorja agencije pa v večini primerov na predlog Komisije imenuje upravni odbor, v ostalih primerih pa ga na predlog upravnega odbora imenuje Komisija ali Svet na podlagi seznama kandidatov, ki ga oblikujeta upravni odbor ali Komisija.
While the management board usually consists of at least one representative of each Member State, the executive director of the agency is, in the majority of cases, appointed by the management board on a proposal from the Commission, in other cases by the Commission on a proposal by the management board, or by the Council on the basis of a list of candidates which is drawn up either by the management board or by the Commission.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba opredeliti skupno medinstitucionalno usmeritev, ki bi organom Evropske unije omogočala sodelovanje, pri čemer bi se dosledno upoštevale vloge in pristojnosti, ki so jim bile dodeljene.
In this respect, it would be useful to draw up common interinstitutional guidelines to enable the EU institutions to collaborate, while strictly respecting each other's tasks and competences.
Prav tako bi bilo treba institucionalizirati okvir za uskladitev delovanja evropskih regulativnih agencij in zagotoviti, da delujejo v skladu z demokratičnimi načeli.
It would also be useful not only to adopt a framework designed to harmonise the operation of the European regulatory agencies but also to effect that on the basis of democratic principles.
Zato je Parlament večkrat pozval Svet, da konstruktivno prispeva k vzpostavitvi enotnega stališča in skladnega političnega pristopa evropskih regulativnih agencij, ki imajo pomemben položaj v verigi institucionalnih mehanizmov Evropske unije.
This is why Parliament has called on the Council on several occasions to make a constructive contribution to developing a common understanding and a congruent approach to policy by the European regulatory agencies, which occupy an important place in the chain of institutional mechanisms of the EU.
Pravna narava evropskih regulativnih agencij sui generis
The sui generis legal nature of the European regulatory agencies
Izvirnost pravne narave regulativnih agencij je v tem, da se jim dodeljujejo pristojnosti, ki se približujejo regulativni vlogi uprave (zlasti v primeru sprejemanja pravno zavezujočih odločitev v zvezi s tretjimi osebami) ter tudi vlogi pravosodnih organov, tj. določanju sankcij.
The particular legal nature of the regulatory agencies consists in the fact that they are assigned competences which resemble not only the regulatory role played by the administration (particularly in the case of legally binding decisions in respect of third parties) but also the role of the judicial authorities in imposing penalties.
Razen tega so agencije pri organizaciji in na finančnem področju delujejo samostojno, njihovim članom pa je pogosto zagotovljena osebna in/ali funkcijska neodvisnost.
Furthermore, the agencies are organisationally and financially autonomous and their members often have guarantees of personal and/or operational independence.
Zaradi omenjenih elementov agencije ne morejo biti razvrščene v tradicionalne pravne kategorije, čeprav že tvorijo parainstitucionalen parameter Evropske unije.
The aforementioned points prevent the agencies being classified in the traditional legal categories despite the fact that they already constitute an accepted para-institutional component of the EU.
V tem primeru evropske regulativne agencije, zlasti tiste, ki so urejene s pogodbo o ES, nimajo „izvršilne funkcije“.
In the present case, the European regulatory agencies, in particular those governed by the EC Treaty, are ‘executive bodies’.
Treba je natančneje navesti, da izraz „regulativne“ ne pooblašča agencij, da sprejemajo splošne regulativne ukrepe, temveč samo, da sprejemajo posamezne odločitve v okviru jasno opredeljene zakonodaje Skupnosti, da se zaščiti načelo institucionalnega ravnovesja. ki izhaja iz člena 7 Pogodbe o ES.
It should be clarified that the term ‘regulatory’ does not imply that the agencies have the authority to take regulatory measures with general effect; they only have the power to issue individual decisions within the framework of clearly defined Community legislation in order to safeguard the principle of institutional balance laid down by Article 7 of the EC Treaty.
Znano je, da je Sodišče v zvezi s tem izdalo sodbo (odločitev na podlagi sodbe Meroni; zadeva 98/80, Romano).
The Court of Justice has issued a judgment on this subject (the Meroni doctrine, Case 98/80, Romano).
Poleg tega lahko zakonodajalec Skupnosti na podlagi pobude Komisije med rednim zakonodajnim postopkom soodločanja vedno presodi o koristnosti ustanavljanja posebne regulativne agencije in objave posebnega regulativnega akta, ki bo urejal organizacijo te agencije, njeno delovanje in odnose z določenimi institucijami in organi.
Moreover, the Community legislator retains the power, on the Commission's initiative, to judge in each case during the normal codecision legislative procedure, whether it is appropriate to set up a specific regulatory agency by publishing a specific regulatory act to govern the organisation, operation and relations of that agency with the institutions and other bodies concerned.
Prav tako lahko zakonodajalec Skupnosti vedno odloči o tem, ali je določeno agencijo koristno ohraniti.
The Community legislator likewise retains the power to decide whether it is appropriate to retain a particular agency or not.
Vprašanje preglednosti in demokratičnega nadzora
The question of transparency and democratic control
Namen v čim večji meri skupnega pristopa, opredeljenega glede strukture in delovanja omenjenih agencij, je zmanjšati administrativna bremena, da bodo te agencije lahko pravilno in učinkovito opravljale svojo regulativno vlogo, da jih bo v prihodnje mogoče nadzorovati ter da se bo lahko vsaj delno izpolnila potreba po nadzoru (reviziji) in sprejemanju odgovornosti, ki je potrebna v tem času.
The proposed approach – a common approach as far as possible – to the structure and operation of the agencies concerned seeks to restrict bureaucratic rigidity so that they can play their regulatory role correctly and effectively and can be supervised and so that the current requirements for auditing and accountability can, at least partially, be satisfied.
Zagotavljanje parlamentarnega nadzora, ki se izvaja nad strukturo in delovanjem regulativnih agencij poteka v skladu s klasičnim demokratičnim načelom, ki določa povečanje politične odgovornosti vseh organom z izvršilno oblastjo.
The establishment of parliamentary control over the structure and the work of the regulatory agencies is consistent with the classic democratic principle requiring political responsibility of any body wielding executive power.
Možnost Evropskega parlamenta, da dodeli politično odgovornost omenjenim agencijam, je povezana z osrednjim načelom predstavniške demokracije, ki vključuje nadzor nad zakonitostjo in utemeljenostjo odločitev izvršilne oblasti.
The possibility of the European Parliament assigning political responsibility to the agencies concerned touches on a core principle of representative democracy, which consists in examining the legality and expediency of the choices made by the executive power.
Skupen medinstitucionalni okvir mora predvideti institucionalno komunikacijo med Evropskim parlamentom in regulativnimi agencijami, komunikacijo, ki bo temeljila predvsem na predstavitvi letnega poročila agencij v Evropskem parlamentu, na možnosti, da se direktorja agencije pred njegovim imenovanjem pozove pred pristojni odbor Evropskega parlamenta, in na tem, da Evropski parlament podeli razrešnico za izvrševanje proračuna agencij, ki prejemajo finančna sredstva Skupnosti.
A common framework for an interinstitutional approach should provide for institutional communication between the European Parliament and the regulatory agencies, which should principally consist in the submission of an annual report by each agency to the European Parliament, the possibility of inviting the director of the agency to appear before the competent European Parliament committee during the appointment procedure and, finally, the granting of discharge by Parliament for the execution of the budgets of those agencies which receive Community funding.
Področja, nad katerimi se bo izvajal parlamentarni nadzor, bi lahko bila jasneje in učinkoviteje opredeljena.
The areas subject to parliamentary control could be defined more clearly and more effectively.
Mogoče bi bilo na primer določiti obvezne razprave o letnih poročilih evropskih regulativnih agencij na plenarnem zasedanju v Evropskem parlamentu, da bi se na podlagi tega postopka zagotovile informacije državljanom.
Provision could be made, for example, for mandatory debate of the annual reports of the European regulatory agencies in the plenary of the European Parliament, making the information available to the public through that procedure.
Skupnemu okviru za medinstitucionalni nadzor naproti
Towards a common framework for interinstitutional control
Poročevalec meni, da je predlog Komisije o skupnem okviru, ki ureja medinstitucionalni dialog za določitev skupnega pristopa, pod pričakovanji glede sklenitve medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
Your rapporteur considers that the Commission’s proposal ‘Towards a common framework’ for interinstitutional dialogue, which will lead to a ‘common approach’, falls short of the European Parliament’s expectations of achieving an interinstitutional agreement.
Prav tako meni, da je skupni pristop vmesna stopnja na poti do sprejetja pravno zavezujočega besedila.
Furthermore, it considers the common approach to be an interim step towards the adoption of a legally binding text.
Vendar razume, da Komisija želi najti izhod iz te že dolgo trajajoče pasivnega medinstitucionalnega položaja.
Nevertheless, it appreciates the Commission's wish to find a way out of a situation of protracted interinstitutional inertia.
Skupni okvir za evropske regulativne agencije, ki ga je predlagala Komisija ( KOM(2008)0135 ), bi lahko nedvomno bil popolnejši.
The operating framework for the European regulatory agencies submitted by the Commission ( COM(2008)0135 ) could undoubtedly be more complete.
Vendar ga je mogoče obravnavati kot konstruktivno izhodiščno točko za dialog.
However, it is possible to consider it as a constructive starting point for dialogue.
Med drugim poročevalec meni, da je dobrodošla ustanovitev medinstitucionalne delovne skupine, ki bo obravnavala podrobne skupne rezultate izkušenj, ki izhajajo iz dejavnosti regulativnih agencij, in ki bo morala odločiti o položaju, ki ga bodo te agencije imele v evropskem upravljanju na več ravneh.
Furthermore, your rapporteur welcomes the setting up of an interinstitutional working group which will carry out a collective policy review of the experience gained from the activities of the regulatory agencies and whose mandate will be to clarify their position in the multilevel system of European governance.
Vaš poročevalec prav tako meni, da je prednostna naloga pri iskanju skupnega okvira glede medinstitucionalnega sporazuma in pristopa na splošno optimizirati dodano vrednost regulativnih agencij v evropskih upravnih strukturah s tem, da se kot pogoji določijo večja preglednost, jasen demokratični nadzor in okrepljena učinkovitost.
Moreover, your rapporteur believes that the priority of seeking a ‘common framework’ for an interinstitutional understanding and approach lies in maximising the added value of the regulatory agencies in the European structures of governance in general by creating greater transparency, visible democratic control and improved efficiency.
PRILOGA – SEZNAM AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE IN PREGLEDNA TABELA O DOLŽNOSTIH EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
ANNEX - LIST OF EUROPEAN UNION AGENCIES AND SUMMARY OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES
(Vir: Generalni direktorat – Notranja politika, zakonodajno usklajevanje in oddelek za spravni postopek)
(source: Directorate General for Internal Policies, Legislative Coordination and Conciliation Unit)
Regulativna agencija
Regulatory agency
Leto ustanovitve
Year of creation
Soodločanje na dan ustanovitve/
Codecision at the time of creation/
Posebni pristojni odbor
Specialised committee responsible
Število članov upravnega odbora, ki jih določi EP
Nominees on the Board
Razgovor pred imenovanjem izvršnega direktorja
Hearing before the nomination of the Executive Director
Evropski center za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja (Cedefop),
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)
Evropska fundacija za izboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih razmer (EUROFOUND)
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND)
Evropska agencija za okolje (EEA)
European Environment Agency (EEA)
Evropska fundacija za usposabljanje (ETF)
European Training Foundation (ETF)
Evropski center za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami (EMCDDA)
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
Evropska agencija za zdravila (EMEA)
European Medicines Agency (EMEA)
Evropska agencije za varnost in zdravje pri delu (EU-OSHA)
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA)
Prevajalski center za organe Evropske unije (CdT)
Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT)
Evropska agencija za obnovo (EAR)
European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR)
Evropska agencija za varno hrano (EFSA)
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Posvetovanje s Parlamentom o 14 članih, ki jih imenuje Svet
Parliament consulted on the 14 members appointed by the Council
Evropska agencija za pomorsko varnost (EMSA)
European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA)
Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu (EASA)
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Evropski center za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni (ECDC)
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
Evropska železniška agencija (ERA)
European Railway Agency (ERA)
Nadzorni organ za evropski GNSS (GSA)
European GNSS Supervisory Authority (GSA)
Evropska agencija za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic (Frontex)
European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex)
Agencija Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva (CFCA)
Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA)
Evropska agencija za kemikalije (ECHA)
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
Agencija Evropske unije za temeljne pravice (FRA, ki nadomešča EMCDDA)
European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA), replacing the EUMC
Agencije za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko (drugi steber)
Common Foreign and Security Policy Agencies (second pillar):
Decentralizirana agencija
Decentralised Agency
Inštitut Evropske unije za varnostne študije (ISS)
European Union Institute for security studies (ISS)
Satelitski center Evropske unije (EUSC)
European Union Satellite Centre (EUCS)
Evropska obrambna agencija (EDA)
European Defence Agency (EDA)
Agencije za pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah (tretji steber)
Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters agencies (Third pillar):
Leto ustanovitve
Year of Creation
Evropski policijski urad (Europol)
European Police Office (Europol)
European Evropska policijska akademija (CEPOL)
European Police College (CEPOL)
Urad za evropsko pravosodno sodelovanje (Eurojust)
European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust)
* Pristojni odbor v skladu s prilogo VI Poslovnika.
* Committee responsible as set out in Annex VI to the Rules of Procedure.
MNENJE Odbora za proračun (*)
Rapporteur for opinion (*):
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – Člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committee - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
2. pozdravlja namen Komisije, da bo začela s podrobnim horizontalnim ocenjevanjem regulativnih agencij, s katerim se bodo preučile resnične posledice njihove ustanovitve in delovanja v Uniji; meni, da je treba v tem okviru oblikovati skladna pravila ocenjevanja;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to launch a thorough horizontal evaluation of the regulatory agencies, examining the real implications of their creation and operation in the Union; believes that, in that framework, coherent evaluation rules need to be established;
5. zato meni, da je odločitev Komisije, da umakne svoj predlog za medinstitucionalni sporazum, pragmatičen korak, ki bi lahko hkrati ustvaril priložnost za iskanje drugih rešitev, ki so nujno potrebne; je prepričan, da je zaradi preglednosti potreben nekakšen horizontalni okvir za agencije, kljub njihovemu različnemu značaju;
Considers, therefore, the Commission's decision to withdraw its proposal for this IIA a pragmatic step that might at the same time create an opportunity to search for other solutions which need to be found as a matter of urgency; is convinced that, for the sake of transparency, some kind of a horizontal framework is necessary for the agencies, despite their variation in character;
7. želi poudariti, kako pomembno je, da se na sistematični osnovi na medinstitucionalni ravni zagotovi uporaba postopka, določenega v točki 47 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
Wishes to reiterate the importance of securing on a systematic basis at interinstitutional level the application of the procedure laid down in Point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
9. poleg tega vztraja, da je treba obstoječe agencije redno in usklajeno ocenjevati glede na to, ali je možnost z agencijo stroškovno učinkovitejša, kot če ustrezne naloge opravljajo službe Komisije;
Insists that, in addition, for the agencies already in existence, regular evaluation has to be carried out, in a coordinated and coherent manner, on whether the agency option is more cost-effective than having the relevant tasks performed by the Commission departments themselves;
11. podpira namen Komisije, da ne bo predlagala novih decentraliziranih agencij, dokler postopek ocenjevanja ni končan, zlasti ker bi bilo zaradi meja sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira brez temeljitega ponovnega načrtovanja trenutno izredno težko financirati nove organe Skupnosti;
Supports the Commission's intention not to propose any new decentralised agencies until the evaluation process is completed, especially against the background that margins of the current Multiannual Financial Framework would make it extremely difficult, for the time being, to finance any new Community body without serious re-programming;
16. poudarja, da je Parliament že leta 2005 pozval, da je, preden se predlaga ustanovitev nove agencije, obvezna analiza stroškov in koristi, ki bi se morala osredotočiti zlasti na vprašanje, ali „je agencija (vključno z morebitnimi stroški za spremljanje in usklajevanje) bolj stroškovno učinkovita, kot če bi zadevne naloge opravile same službe Komisije“, pa tudi na vprašanja, kot so mandat in delovne metode agencije ali stopnja njene neodvisnosti od Komisije, saj je to za zakonodajalca pogosto še posebej pomembno;
Recalls that as early as 2005 Parliament called for compulsory cost-benefit assessments before a new agency was proposed which should, in particular, concentrate on the question whether "the agency option (including the likely costs of monitoring and coordination) is more cost-effective than having the relevant tasks performed by the Commission departments themselves" but also on issues such as the mandate and working methods of the agency or its degree of independence from the Commission as it is often of particular interest to the legislator;
- Ustreznost: V kolikšni meri so cilji, začrtani v ustanovitveni uredbi agencije, ustrezali ravni javne porabe, odobrene v proračunu?
- Relevance: To what extent were the objectives foreseen by the founding regulation of an agency relevant for the level of public spending authorised in the budget?
- Uspešnost: Kakšen učinek (vpliv) je imela dejavnost agencije?
- Effectiveness: Which effects (impact) have been obtained by the activity of the agency?
- Učinkovitost (stroškovna učinkovitost): Kako ekonomično so se posamezni vnosi pretvorili v donose in rezultate?
- Efficiency (cost-effectiveness): How economically have the various inputs been converted into outputs and results?
Ali so bili (pričakovani) učinki doseženi ob sprejemljivih stroških, zlasti glede vključenega osebja in notranje organizacije?
Were the (expected) effects obtained at a reasonable cost, in particular with regard to the staff deployed and to the internal organisation?
21. opozarja, da morajo biti dejavnosti agencij urejene z jasno določenimi zahtevami glede odgovornosti, v skladu z določbami finančne uredbe; poudarja obveznosti agencij v zvezi s postopkom podelitve razrešnice;
Recalls that the agencies' actions need to be governed by clear lines of accountability, in line with the provisions of the Financial Regulation; highlights the agencies' obligations concerning the discharge procedure;
4. poudarja, da pomen agencij v upravnem okviru Evropske unije poziva k skupnemu razumevanju namena in vloge agencij pri institucijah EU, ki zdaj ni dovolj prisotno;
Stresses that the importance of agencies in the EU's administrative framework calls for a common understanding between the EU institutions of the purpose and role of agencies, which, at the present time, is lacking;
· umakne svoj predlog o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu;
· withdraw its proposal for an interinstitutional agreement;
· opravi horizontalno ocenjevanje regulativnih agencij do konca leta 2009 ter o rezultatih čim prej poroča Parlamentu in Svetu;
· undertake a horizontal evaluation of the regulatory agencies by the end of 2009, and to report as soon as possible to Parliament and the Council on the results;
· ne predlaga novih regulativnih agencij, dokler to ocenjevanje ni končano;
· propose no new regulatory agencies until this evaluation has been completed;
· opravi pregled svojih notranjih sistemov, ki urejajo odnose z agencijami, in tudi metodologije za izvedbo ocene učinka agencij;
· undertake a review of its own internal systems governing relations with agencies, as well as the methodology for conducting impact assessments of agencies;
7. vztraja, da mora biti postopek revizije/razrešitve v sorazmerju s celotnim proračunom agencij; zlasti ugotavlja, da se sredstva, ki so na voljo Evropskemu računskemu sodišču, niso povečala v skladu s številom agencij v zadnjih letih;
Insists that the auditing/discharge process must be proportionate to the overall budget of the agencies; notes in particular that the resources available to the European Court of Auditors have not increased in line with the number of agencies in recent years;
9. meni, da bi morale vse agencije skupaj z organizacijsko shemo predložiti pregled stalnega in začasnega osebja ter nacionalnih strokovnjakov, skupaj s spremembami glede na prejšnji dve leti;
Is of the opinion that all agencies should give, together with their establishment plan, an overview of their permanent and temporary staff and national experts, together with changes in relation to the previous two years;