natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ko se je v Hongkongu uporaba kartice Octopus, prvotno namenjene za plačilo prevoza, razširila tudi na plačilo izdelkov v kioskih (na primer časopisov, sendvičev itd.) v podzemni železnici, se je promet v trgovinah na postajah podzemne železnice povečal za 30 %.
In Hong Kong, when the "Octopus" card, used originally for transport payments, was expanded to include payments for products from kiosks in the underground, such as newspapers, sandwiches, etc., there was a 30% increase in turnover in station shops.
V okviru trenutne direktive o elektronskem denarju Oyster Card London nima dovoljenja za ponujanje takšne storitve.
Under the current e-money directive, Oyster Card London is not permitted to provide such a service.
Novi predlog ukinja določbo o izključnosti, kar naj bi spodbudilo rast in širitev uporabe elektronskega denarja.
The new proposal takes away this "exclusivity" provision, which should encourage e-money growth and expansion.
Vsekakor je pomembno, da imajo institucije še naprej ustrezen nadzor in kapital za katerekoli storitve, ki jih želijo ponujati.
It is important, however, that the institution continues to have the controls and capital appropriate for whatever other service it chooses to branch out into.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba določiti mejo za zneske elektronskega denarja, da bi se preprečila njihova uporaba za podpiranje drugih sorodnih storitev.
Also the e-money funds should be ring-fenced to prevent leakage into support of any associated services.
Zahteve v zvezi s tekočim kapitalom
Ongoing capital requirements
Sedanja direktiva o elektronskem denarju določa znesek tekočega kapitala kot fiksno stopnjo v višini 2 % tekočega zneska ali kot spremenljivo stopnjo.
The current e-money directive requires ongoing capital to be at a flat 2% of the current amount, or "float".
Predlog Komisije predvideva različne metode za izračun te ravni, da bi se dosegla uskladitev z metodami A,B in C kot tudi z novo metodo D v členu 8 direktive o plačilnih storitvah.
The Commission proposal suggests a variety of methods for calculating this level, in an effort to bring it into line with PSD Article 8 with its methods A, B & C as well as a new method "D".
Vsi pristopi predvidevajo postopne kapitalske zahteve, ki so regresivne in zapostavljajo najmanjša podjetja, v katerih so mejni stroški najvišji (na primer 5 % za prvih 5 milijonov EUR v skladu z metodo D v členu 7 novega predloga).
These approaches all set graded capital requirements which are regressive and which penalise the smallest firms, where the marginal cost of capital is at its highest (e.g. 5% for the first €5 million under Method D in Article 7 of the new proposal).
Vsekakor se narava storitev elektronskega denarja precej razlikuje od narave plačilnih storitev.
However, the nature of e-money services is quite different to that of payment services.
Zato se ne zdi smiselno prenašati metod izračuna, zlasti ker ni bil ocenjen njihov vpliv in so bile posledica kompromisne rešitve, ki je vključevala metode izračuna večine držav članic.
Therefore it does not make sense to import these calculation methods, particularly as they were not impact-assessed and were the result of a compromise solution incorporating most member states' capital calculation methods.
Po drugi strani pa bi vrnitev k prejšnjemu sistemu izračuna za zahteve v zvezi s tekočim kapitalom (lastna sredstva), ki ni bil deležen veliko kritik, omogočila institucijam, da nadaljujejo z uporabo metode, ki jo poznajo, kar bi poenostavilo izvajanje tega ukrepa.
Alternatively, reverting back to the previous calculation system for ongoing capital requirements ("own funds"), which received very little criticism, would allow institutions to continue to use a method with which they are familiar, and simplify the implementation of this measure.
Poročevalec meni, da je fiksna stopnja v višini 1,5 % za metodo D sprejemljiv kompromis, pri čemer bi bilo treba izvzeti družbe mobilne telefonije, ki ne morejo izračunavati spremenljive stopnje, saj se dobroimetje strank lahko uporablja za telefonske storitve ali pa kot elektronski denar.
Your rapporteur considers a flat 1.5% level for method D as a reasonable compromise, with a carve-out for mobile phone companies that are unable to calculate "float" due to the fact that customers' pre-paid accounts can be used for both phone-related services as well as e-money.
V predlogu Komisije je prav tako predvideno, da lahko države članice zvišajo ali znižajo kapitalske zahteve do 20 %.
In the Commission proposal, Member States are also permitted to raise or lower the capital requirement by up to 20%.
Poročevalec meni, da to v usklajenem predlogu ni smiselno in bi samo vodilo v neenake konkurenčne pogoje.
However, in a harmonised proposal, the rapporteur considers this makes no sense, and would only result in a very uneven playing field if used.
Unovčenje sredstev
Redemption of funds
Potrošniki bi morali imeti pravico, da kadarkoli brezplačno unovčijo sredstva.
Consumers should have the right to redeem their funds at any time with no charge.
To je bilo predvideno tako v prvotni direktivi kot tudi v novem predlogu.
This was included in both the original Directive and in the new proposal.
V večini držav članic, čeprav ne v vseh
In most Member State markets (though not all
Želeli bi se izogniti stroškom unovčenja, vendar pa bi sprejeli tudi pravico pogodbenih strank, da se pogodbeno sporazumejo, če to želijo, kar bi lahko vključevalo pogoje unovčenja in stroške, če je to jasno določeno v pogodbi in se uporabnik s tem izrecno strinja.
We would prefer to see no redemption charges but also accept the right of parties to agree a contract (if they so wish), which may include redemption conditions and fees, so long as this is clearly detailed and is agreed expressly by the user.
Zaščita sredstev
Safeguarding of funds
Nedvomno je, da je najbolj zapleten del predloga zagotoviti, da je izdajatelj elektronskega denarja v vsakem trenutku sposoben povrniti denarne zneske vseh svojih strank.
Easily the most complicated section of the proposal is the clear aim to ensure that an e-money issuer will always be able to redeem the funds of all its customers at any point in time.
Zaščita sredstev je pri tem bistvena.
The safeguarding of these funds is essential for this.
Vendar pa je metoda in raven zaščite predmet razprave.
However, the method and level of safeguarding is under dispute.
Pri tem se sklicuje na člen 9 direktive o plačilnih storitvah, ki zahteva od plačilnih institucij, da zaščitijo sredstva na bančnem računu ali jih vložijo v „varna, likvidna sredstva z nizkim tveganjem, kakor jih opredelijo pristojni organi...“ in „so sredstva v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ... izvzeta...v primeru nesolventnosti“.
Reference is made to the PSD Article 9, which requires payment institutions to safeguard these funds in a bank account or invest them in "secure, liquid, low-risk assets as defined by the competent authorities…" and "insulated in accordance with national law…in the event of insolvency".
To je razumljivo za institucije, ki ponujajo številne storitve: plačila, elektronski denar itd. (na primer mešane institucije).
This is understandable for institutions that provide multiple services - payments, e-money, etc. (i.e. "hybrid" institutions).
Poročevalec meni, da je zaželeno, da bi vsi izdajatelji elektronskega denarja, vključno s tistimi, ki izdajajo samo elektronski denar, zagotovili osnovno zaščito.
However, your rapporteur considers it desirable that all e-money issuers, including those that only do e-money, should provide this basic safeguard.
Kot že enkrat omenjeno, novi predlog Komisije samodejno izvzema izdajatelje elektronskega denarja, ki delujejo lokalno (na primer izdajatelje darilnih bonov, ki jih je možno unovčiti samo v trgovinah ali v verigi trgovin, kjer so bili kupljeni), znotraj omejenega omrežja (na primer samo v javnem prometu nekega mesta ali nekega podjetja) ali ponujajo omejeno število izdelkov ali storitev.
As mentioned earlier, the new Commission proposal automatically exempts e-money issuers which operate locally (e.g. issuers of gift vouchers that can only be redeemed in the shop or chain of shops they were bought in), within a "limited" network (e.g. only in public transport in one city, or from one company) or range of goods or services.
Člen 10 uvaja dodatne izjeme za institucije do določene velikosti, ki jih države članice lahko uporabijo.
Article 10 introduces an additional waiver for institutions under a certain size, which Member States may implement.
Še enkrat pa je treba poudariti, da je uporabljeno besedilo iz direktive o plačilnih storitvah, ki je bolj primerna za plačilne institucije, saj vrednotenje poteka na podlagi opravljenih plačil.
However, once again, it uses text from the PSD which is much more suited to payment institutions, as it measures according to payments made.
Ker institucije za izdajo elektronskega denarja razpolagajo z denarjem v imenu strank, se zdi bolj smiselno, da je ureditev izjem odvisna od denarnih zneskov, ki jih ima institucija.
As e-money institutions hold money on behalf of a customer, it makes more sense to base the waiver on the money held by the institution.
Poročevalec meni, da je besedilo te de minimis ureditve izjem, ki se nahaja v stari oziroma obstoječi direktivi o elektronskem denarju, bolj primerno za institucije za izdajo elektronskega denarja.
Your rapporteur considers that the text for this de minimis waiver from the old/current e-money directive is more suited to e-money institutions.
Prav tako je bil znižan prag, da bo večje število izdajateljev elektronskega denarja zmožnih pridobiti status pooblaščenih institucij, ki bodo lahko izkoristile znižanje zahtevanega ustanovnega kapitala.
The threshold has also been lowered as more e-money issuers will be able to become authorised institutions as they will benefit from the reduced initial capital charge.
To je pomembno tudi z vidika varstva potrošnikov.
This is also important in terms of consumer protection.
o smernicah za proračunski postopek 2010
on the guidelines for the 2010 budget procedure
o smernicah za proračunski postopek 2010, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament, Oddelek II – Svet, Oddelek IV – Sodišče, Oddelek V – Računsko sodišče, Oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, Oddelek VII – Odbor regij, Oddelek VIII – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, Oddelek IX – Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov
on the guidelines for the 2010 budget procedure, Section I – European Parliament, Section II – Council, Section IV – Court of Justice, Section V – Court of Auditors, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII – Committee of the Regions, Section VIII – European Ombudsman, Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor
- ob upoštevanju člena 272 Pogodbe o ES,
- having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty,
- ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2000/597/ES, Euratom z dne 29. septembra 2000 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti
- having regard to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources
- ob upoštevanju petega poročila generalnih sekretarjev institucij o razvojnih smernicah razdelka 5 finančne perspektive iz maja 2006,
- having regard to the fifth report by the Secretaries-General of the institutions on trends in heading 5 of the financial perspective of May 2006,
A ker Evropski parlament na tej stopnji letnega postopka čaka na načrte odhodkov drugih institucij in predloge svojega predsedstva za proračun za leto 2010,
A. whereas, at this stage of the annual procedure, the European Parliament is awaiting the other institutions' estimates and its own Bureau's proposals for the 2010 budget,
B. ker je bilo predlagano, da se poskusni projekt okrepljenega sodelovanja in odnosov med predsedstvom in Odborom za proračun nadaljuje tudi v drugem letu, skozi ves proračunski postopek za leto 2010,
B. whereas it has been proposed to continue the pilot exercise on enhanced cooperation and relations between the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets, for a second year, throughout the 2010 budget procedure,
D. ker proračun Evropskega parlamenta za leto 2009 znaša 1.529.970.930 EUR, kar je 19,67 % razdelka 5 za to leto,
D. whereas the European Parliament's budget for 2009 amounts to EUR 1 529 970 930, representing 19.67 % of heading 5 this year,
Splošni okvir
General f ramework
4. poudarja, da bo 2010 leto stalnega prilagajanja Parlamenta v smislu boljših delovnih metod in posodobitev, ki so skladne z njegovimi političnimi in zakonodajnimi pristojnostmi, ter nizu večjih večletnih pobud, ki so se začele v zadnjih nekaj letih;
Points out that 2010 will be a year of continued adaptation for the Parliament as concerns the improvement of its working methods and modernisation, which go hand in hand with its political and legislative responsibilities, and as concerns a series of major multi-annual initiatives launched during the past few years;
7. pričakuje, da bo predsedstvo predložilo realistične zahteve pri predstavitvi izračunov, in je njegove predloge pripravljen preučiti skrbno in v celoti na osnovi potreb, da se zagotovi ustrezno in učinkovito delovanje institucij;
Is expecting the Bureau to submit realistic requests when presenting the estimates, and is ready to examine its proposals on a fully needs-based and prudent basis in order to ensure an appropriate and efficient functioning of the institution;
9. je prepričan, da bo treba v primeru prihodnje ratifikacije lizbonske pogodbe obravnavati potrebne prilagoditve povezane s proračunskimi izdatki v skladu z veljavnimi proračunskimi postopki;
Believes that, in the event of a future ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, any necessary adaptations requiring budget expenditure would have to be dealt with at that time according to the budgetary procedures in force;
Enak dostop do jezikovnih storitev za poslance Evropskega parlamenta
Equal access to language facilities for Member s of the European Parliament
15. prav tako meni, da je treba uporabiti vsa sredstva za povečanje prilagodljivosti tolmačenja kot ključnega koraka za zagotovitev dobrih delovnih praks, in ugotavlja, da bi v številnih primerih lahko preprečili težave in razsipavanje sredstev, če bi bilo mogoče v kratkem času zamenjati jezike glede na dejansko, ne pa načrtovano prisotnost na zasedanjih;
Is also of the opinion that all means must be sought to increase the flexibility of interpretation as a crucial step to ensure good working practices and notes that, in many instances, problems and financial wastage could be avoided if there were a possibility to swap languages at short notice depending on the actual attendance at meetings rather than the planned attendance;
Optimalna raba virov za izboljšanje zakonodajnega dela Evropskega parlamenta
Optimal use of resources to improve the European Parliament's legislative work.
18. ponovno opozarja, da je bilo za leto 2009 dogovorjeno bistveno povečanje števila zaposlenih, čeprav je bilo hkrati dogovorjeno, da so kadrovski viri po obsežnemu povečanju števila zaposlenih z nedavnimi širitvami sedaj v fazi konsolidacije in da bi bilo treba stalno izvajati prerazporeditve; ponovno poziva vse službe in politične skupine, naj zagotovijo celovite obrazložitve za svoje zahteve že v začetku postopka;
Recalls that a significant increase of staffing levels was agreed for 2009 although, at the same time, it was generally agreed that staff resources had now entered a phase of consolidation and that redeployment should be a continuous process following the very significant increases made with the recent enlargements; renews its call on all services and the political groups to provide full justifications for their requests from the outset of the procedure;
22. opozarja predsedstvo na delovne pogoje oseb, zaposlenih pri pogodbenih partnerjih Parlamenta; s tem v zvezi poziva predsedstvo, naj zagotovi, da bodo ta podjetja v celoti poslovala v skladu z veljavno delovno zakonodajo;
Draws the Bureau's attention to the working conditions of the persons employed by the contractors operating in Parliament; calls on the Bureau, in this connection, to make sure that those firms fully comply with the applicable labour legislation;
Razširjanje informacij med poslanci
Dissemination of information to Members
24. meni, da je za postopek 2010 pomembno razjasniti razmere v korist vseh poslancev, vključno s tistimi, ki so povezani s proračunskimi vidiki, da bi jasneje določili različne odgovornosti in način za najbolj učinkovito organizacijo teh pobud; zato bi pozdravil posvetovanje Odbora za proračun o načinu njihove uporabe, aktualno razmišljanje v zvezi z različnimi elementi in kako naj bi bili medsebojno povezani; vztraja, da uprava novoizvoljenim poslancem posreduje izčrpne informacije, tudi o storitvah, do katerih so upravičeni;
Considers it important for the 2010 procedure to clarify the situation for the benefit of all Members, including those dealing with the budgetary aspects, in order to define more clearly the different responsibilities and how to best arrange these initiatives in the most efficient way; would therefore welcome a hearing of the Committee on Budgets on how these are to be used, the current thinking with regard to the different elements, and how these will relate to each other; insists that the administration should also ensure exhaustive information to the newly elected Members concerning the services to which they are entitled;
Obveščanje državljanov o Parlamentu
Communicating Parliament to citizens
26. je seznanjen s sklepom predsedstva v zvezi s hišo evropske zgodovine in poudarja potrebo po polnem in preglednem posvetovanju s pristojnimi odbori o konceptu, vsebini in proračunskih vidikih v skladu s poskusnim procesom okrepljenega sodelovanja med predsedstvom in Odborom za proračun;
Takes note of the Bureau's decision concerning the "House of European History" and emphasises the need for a full and transparent consultation with the competent Committees on its concept, contents and budgetary aspects in line with the pilot procedure on enhanced cooperation between the Bureau and Committee on Budgets;
28. v zvezi s tem ponovno poziva k vpogledu v posebno poročilo in priporočila v zvezi z nepotrebno visokimi stroški vzdrževanja, obnove in nakupa stavb EU, vključno s stavbami Parlamenta; še vedno želi, naj to poročilo zajame široko paleto področij, da bo mogoče odkriti glavne vzroke, naj bodo ti povezani s tržnimi omejitvami, bremeni, ki jih nalagajo finančna uredba in javni razpisi, ali katerim drugim bistvenim dejavnikom; želi potrditev, da se izvaja pravilo o oblikovanju črnega seznama podjetij, ki so predložila nepotrebno visoke stroške;
In this regard, reiterates its call to see a specific report and any possible recommendations concerning unnecessarily high maintenance, renovation and purchase costs relating to EU buildings, including the Parliament's; still wishes this to be a cross-cutting effort in order to establish the root causes, whether linked to a restricted market in any way, to burdens imposed by the Financial Regulation and public tendering, or to any other relevant factor; requests confirmation that the rule requiring the blacklisting of firms that have put forward unnecessarily high costs should be enforced;
Nadaljevanje različnih vidikov iz postopka za leto 2009
Continuation of various aspects from the 2009 procedure
33. pozdravlja dejstvo, da so okoljski cilji omenjeni v dokumentu predsedstva, ter po predhodnem postopku EMAS in preučevanju emisij ogljika meni, da bo leto 2010 resnično nudilo priložnost za nadaljevanje teh prizadevanj, med drugim s predvidenim akcijskim načrtom za CO2, ki naj bi ga sprejelo predsedstvo;
Welcomes the fact that environmental goals are mentioned in the Bureau's document and, following the previous "EMAS process" and work on the "carbon footprint", considers that 2010 will indeed provide an opportunity to continue these efforts inter alia by the forthcoming adoption of a CO 2 action plan by the Bureau;
Druge institucije
Other i nstitution s
35. želi še podrobneje preučiti možnost boljše izmenjave razpoložljivih virov med vsemi institucijami, zlasti če so proste zmogljivosti na področju, ki bi bile lahko z ustrezno organizacijo koristno uporabljene na drugem področju in/ali v instituciji,
Wishes to explore still further the possibility of better sharing the available resources between all Institutions, especially when there might be free capacity in one area which, if organised properly, could be taken advantage of and used in another area and/or institution;
Smernice za proračunski postopek 2010, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament, Oddelek II – Svet, Oddelek IV – Sodišče, Oddelek V – Računsko sodišče, Oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, Oddelek VII – Odbor regij, Oddelek VIII – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, Oddelek IX – Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov
Guidelines for the 2010 budget procedure, Section I – European Parliament, Section II – Council, Section IV – Court of Justice, Section V – Court of Auditors, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII – Committee of the Regions, Section VIII(A) – European Ombudsman, Section VIII(B) – European Data Protection Supervisor
o sodelovanju med sodišči držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah
on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o uporabi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 z dne 28. maja 2001 o sodelovanju med sodišči držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah ( KOM(2007)0769 ),
– having regard to the Commission's report on the application of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters ( COM(2007)0769 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6–0058/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0058/2009 ),
A. ker se uredba (ES) št. 1206/2001 ni izvajala tako učinkovito, kot bi bilo mogoče, in je zato treba sprejeti nadaljnje ukrepe, da bi se izboljšalo sodelovanje med sodišči držav članic na področju pridobivanja dokazov in povečala učinkovitost uredbe,
A. whereas Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 has not been enforced as effectively as it might have been, and further action is therefore needed in order to improve cooperation between the Member States’ courts for the purposes of taking evidence and enhancing the efficiency of the regulation,
B. ker se z uredbo (ES) št. 1206/2001 želi izboljšati, poenostaviti in pospešiti sodelovanje med sodišči pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah,
B. whereas Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 sets out to improve, simplify and accelerate cooperation between courts on the taking of evidence in civil and commercial matters,
C. ker je Komisija sicer na koncu leta 2006 in v začetku leta 2007 poskrbela za razdelitev skupno 50 000 izvodov praktičnega vodnika državam članicam, vendar je bilo to storjeno veliko prepozno in je zato treba sprejeti več dodatnih ukrepov, da bi bili udeleženi v postopkih, zlasti sodišča in pravniki, bolje obveščeni o uredbi,
C. whereas the Commission admittedly arranged for the distribution of a total of 50 000 copies of the practice guide to Member States in late 2006/early 2007, but this was done much too late, and other steps accordingly need to be taken in addition so as to enable those involved in proceedings, especially courts and practitioners, to be better informed about the Regulation,
D. ker je Komisija vseeno ugotovila, da je 90-dnevni rok za izpolnitev zaprosil za pridobivanje dokazov iz člena 10(1) uredbe prekoračen v znatnem številu primerov ter da je v "nekaterih primerih [...] potrebnih celo več kot 6 mesecev";
D. whereas the Commission finds nevertheless that the 90-day time-limit for complying with requests for the taking of evidence laid down in Article 10(1) of the Regulation is exceeded in a “significant number of cases” and that “in some cases even more than 6 months are required”,