natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ob tem omenja sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, po kateri se koncesija podeli z obvezno zahtevo po preglednosti in konkurenčnosti in se preveri, če so bili postopki oddaje nepristranski/nevtralni.
In this connection, it mentions the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, under which concessions are subject to transparency and competition requirements when they are granted and award procedures may be checked for impartiality/neutrality.
Zaradi konkurence je trajanje koncesij treba določiti tako, da ne omejuje odprte konkurence.
Competition in this area requires that the duration of concessions should be fixed so as not to restrict free competition.
Kljub temu je koncesionarju treba omogočiti, da amortizira svoje tveganje in ima primeren donos.
Nevertheless, a concessionaire should be able to pay off his investment and secure a reasonable return on it.
Pomembno je vprašanje podaljšanja koncesij.
The question of the renewal of concessions is an important one.
To ustreza potrebi po konkurenčnosti, a povsem naravno je, da bodo pristaniške oblasti zaključeno koncesijo želele podaljšati s poenostavljenim upravnim postopkom.
Of course there is a need for competition, but port authorities would naturally like to renew an expired concession under a simplified administrative procedure.
Poleg tega Komisija želi pomagati razširjati najboljše prakse glede preglednosti pristaniških pristojbin in pripraviti seznam težav, s katerimi se evropska pristanišča srečujejo zaradi pristanišč tretjih držav.
In addition, the Commission wishes to help disseminate best practice as regards the transparency of port charges and take stock of problems encountered by European ports with third country ports.
Že prej smo omenili, da za pristanišča sosednjih držav pogosto ne veljajo ista pravila in zahteve kot za evropska pristanišča, kar lahko pomeni njihovo prednost pred evropskimi pristanišči.
As mentioned above, ports in neighbouring countries are frequently not subject to the same rules and requirements as European ports, which can give them an advantage over the latter.
Peti del obravnava odnose med pristanišči in mesti.
The fifth part of the communication deals with relations between ports and cities.
Preverila bo vire financiranja za boljše povezovanje pristanišč z mesti, katerih del so.
The Commission will examine possible sources of finance for improving the integration of ports with the cities to which they are linked.
Namerava še opraviti oceno učinka sedanjih varnostnih ukrepov, da bi bili čim bolj združljivi z dostopnostjo pristaniških območij.
It also plans to assess the impact of current safety measures and strike a balance between the need for such measures and the need to keep port areas accessible.
Zadnji del sporočila Komisija nameni delu v pristaniščih.
Finally, in the last part of the communication, the Commission examines work in ports.
Spodbuditi namerava ustanovitev evropskega odbora za sektorski socialni dialog v pristaniščih.
It plans to encourage the setting up of a European sectoral dialogue committee for ports.
Pripraviti namerava tudi medsebojno priznan okvir o usposabljanju pristaniških delavcev.
It will also draw up a mutually recognisable framework for the training of port workers.
Glede varnosti in zdravja pri delu Komisija opozarja na veljavna pravila in že objavljana druga sporočila na to temo.
With regard to health and safety at work, the Commission points to the existing rules in this area and its previous communications on the subject.
Pozorno bo spremljala upoštevanju obstoječih pravil in statistične podatke v zvezi z nesrečami, ki jih zbira Eurostat.
It will ensure that existing rules are monitored and that accident statistics are collected by Eurostat.
Mnenje poročevalca – Ključne točke
Rapporteur's Opinion - Key Points
Poročevalec pozitivno sprejema sporočilo Komisije.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission communication.
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta zlasti opozarja na pomen pristanišč v Evropi in na njihovo različnosti.
The European Parliament's motion for a resolution highlights both the importance of this sector to Europe and its diversity.
Ob napovedani izdaji smernic o uporabi okoljske zakonodaje Skupnosti za pristanišča poročevalec opozarja na velik pomen skupne okoljske perspektive in pristopa k razvoju pristanišč.
With regard to the publication of guidelines for the implementation of Community environment legislation in this sector, the report underlines the importance of taking a common approach to the environment and port development.
Ko se kot zakonodajalec lotevamo okoljske politike, moramo nujno upoštevati specifično naravo pristanišč.
The specific nature of the port sector needs to be taken into account by the legislator when considering environment policy.
Povezave z zaledjem so velikega pomena za pristanišča in njihov razvoj.
Hinterland connections are of considerable importance to ports and their development.
Pristanišče z ugodno lego ne bo moglo razviti svojega potenciala, če ne bo imelo dobrih povezav.
In addition, maritime transport must be treated in the same way as other transport modes.
Poleg tega mora biti ladijski promet deležen iste obravnave kot drugi načini prevoza, zato poročevalec Komisijo poziva, naj s predlogom o skupnem evropskem pomorskem prostoru brez ovir vzpostavi enake pogoje za vsa pristanišča.
Your rapporteur therefore calls on the Commission to ensure equal conditions for the sector in its proposal on maritime transport without barriers.
Kratki ladijski promet v Evropi ne sme biti v slabšem položaju, zato v Evropi ne bi smel veljati carinski nadzor za carinjeno blago s strani Skupnosti.
Short-sea shipping in Europe should not be placed at a disadvantage and Community-cleared goods should not be subject to further customs inspection in Europe.
Poročilo opozarja na pomembno vlogo novih tehnologij v sektorju.
The report highlights the important role of new technologies in this sector.
Z novimi tehnologijami bi se pristanišča lahko zoperstavila pritiskom zaradi konkurence tretjih držav in pomanjkanju prostora za njihov razvoj, s čimer bi se povečala njihova učinkovitost in donosnost.
These technologies can help ports to overcome competitive pressures from third countries and the lack of space for expansion and thus enhance their efficiency and profitability.
Konkurenca pristanišč tretjih držav je zelo zaskrbljujoča, saj za ta pristanišča ne veljajo iste obveznosti in pravila, zato so zaradi bolj permisivne zakonodaje glede državne pomoči ali okolja v boljšem položaju.
Competition with third country ports is a source of concern, since the latter are not subject to the same obligations and rules as those in the Union and may therefore enjoy an advantage as a result of less stringent provisions on state aids or the environment.
5. opozarja, da so glavna pristanišča Unije v splošnem dobro opremljena in učinkovita, da pa ostajajo precejšnje razlike med pristanišči novih in starih držav članic, kar zadeva opremo in tehnologijo;
Recalls that the EU's main ports are generally well equipped and efficient but that there remain nevertheless considerable differences in terms of equipment and technology between the ports of the new and the old Member States;
8. pozdravlja predlog Komisije, katerega namen je na ravni Skupnosti opredeliti vrsto skupnih zahtev v zvezi s poklicnim usposabljanjem pristaniških delavcev, da se ob vzajemnem priznavanju njihovih kvalifikacij in usklajenem razvoju pristanišč poveča njihova mobilnost;
Welcomes the Commission proposal to establish, at Community level, a series of common requirements as regards professional training for port workers with a view to enhancing their mobility by means of the mutual recognition of their qualifications and the harmonious development of ports;
10. poudarja, da morajo pristaniški in lokalni organi sodelovati pri pripravi načrtov za upravljanje povodij in morskih pristanišč v zvezi s kakovostjo voda, kot to določa direktiva 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike
Underlines the need to involve port and local authorities in drawing up plans to manage the water quality of river basins and maritime ports in accordance with Framework Directive 2006/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for a Community policy in the field of water
UL L št. 327, 22.12.2000, str.
OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
1. ; poudarja, da se morajo tudi regionalni in lokalni organi pridružiti naporom za zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 iz plovil in drugih kopenskih in zračnih prevoznih sredstev ter pripraviti načrte za upravljanje kakovosti zraka v skladu s konvencijo Marpol in direktivo 96/62/ES Sveta z dne 27. septembra 1996 o ocenjevanju in upravljanju kakovosti zunanjega zraka
1. ; draws attention to the need for regional authorities to support the efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from ships and from land and air transport by laying down air quality management plans and conforming to the Marpol Convention and to Framework Directive 96/62/EC of the Council of 27 September 1996 concerning the evaluation and management of the quality of the ambient air
UL L št. 296, 21.11.1996, str.
OJ L 296, 21.11.1996, p.
Organizacija za črnomorsko gospodarsko sodelovanje), naj sprejmejo združljive postopke in prakse za pospeševanje regionalne trgovine in zmanjšanje stroškov;
Calls for the establishment of an EU-wide network for the exchange of best practices among EU ports; calls upon regional organisations that include EU and non-EU members, such as the Organisation of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC), to adopt compatible procedures and practices in order to facilitate regional trade and save costs;
o oceni sankcij EU kot delu dejavnosti in politik EU na področju človekovih pravic
on the evaluation of EU sanctions as part of the EU’s actions and policies in the area of human rights
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................21
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................21
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................29
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................29
– ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah,
– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
– ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah ter njegovih dveh izbirnih protokolov,
– having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the two optional protocols thereto,
– ob upoštevanju Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov, zlasti njenih členov 1 in 25 ter členov 39 in 41 poglavja VII te listine,
– having regard to the Charter of the United Nations and specifically Articles 1 and 25 and, in Chapter VII, Articles 39 and 41 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in njenih protokolov,
– having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights and the protocols thereto,
– ob upoštevanju Pariške listine za Novo Evropo,
– having regard to the Charter of Paris for a New Europe,
– ob upoštevanju Helsinške sklepne listine,
– having regard to the Helsinki Final Act,
– ob upoštevanju členov 3, 6, 11, 13, 19, 21, 29 in 39 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter členov 60, 133, 296, 297, 301 in 308 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
– having regard to Articles 3, 6, 11, 13, 19, 21, 29 and 39 of the Treaty on European Union and Articles 60, 133, 296, 297, 301 and 308 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
OJ L 303, 14.12.2007, p.
OJ C 303, 14.12.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o razmerah na področju človekovih pravic v svetu,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation with regard to human rights in the world,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. septembra 1996 o sporočilu Komisije o vključitvi spoštovanja demokratičnih načel in človekovih pravic v sporazume med Skupnostjo in tretjimi državami ( KOM(1995)0216 )
– having regard to its resolution of 20 September 1996 on the Communication of the Commission on the inclusion of respect for democratic principles and human rights in agreements between the Community and third countries ( COM(1995)0216 )
OJ L 320, 28.10.1996, p.
OJ C 320, 28.10.1996, p.
– ob upoštevanju mednarodnih obveznosti Evropske skupnosti in njenih držav članic, vključno s tistimi iz sporazumov STO,
– having regard to the international obligations of the European Community and its Member States, including those contained in WTO Agreements,
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisanega v Cotonouju dne 23. junija 2000 (sporazum iz Cotonouja)
– having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (the Cotonou Agreement)
3. , ter zlasti členov 8, 9, 33, 96 in 98 tega sporazuma in njegovega ponovnega pregleda
3. , specifically Articles 8, 9, 33, 96 and 98 thereof, and to the revision of that Agreement
OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p.
OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta z naslovom „Ustanovitev formacije za sankcije Delovne skupine svetovalcev za zunanje odnose (RELEX/sankcije)“ z dne 22. januarja 2004
– having regard to the document entitled ‘Establishment of a ‘Sanctions’ formation of the Foreign Relations Counsellors Working party (RELEX/Sanctions)’ of 22 January 2004
– ob upoštevanju „Osnovnih načel o uporabi omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij)“ Evropske unije z dne 7. junija 2004
– having regard to the European Union’s ‘Basic Principles on the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)’ of 7 June 2004
– ob upoštevanju „Smernic za izvajanje in ocenjevanje omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij) v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike EU“, ki jih je pripravila Evropska unija in so bile nazadnje pregledane 2. decembra 2005
– having regard to the European Union’s ‘Guidelines on implementation and evaluation of restrictive measures (sanctions) in the framework of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy’, last reviewed on 2 December 2005
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta z naslovom „Najboljše prakse EU za učinkovito izvajanje omejevalnih ukrepov“ z dne 9. julija 2007
– having regard to the document entitled ‘EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures’ of 9 July 2007
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča 96/697/SZVP o Kubi
– having regard to Common Position 96/697/CFSP on Cuba
OJ L 322, 12.12.1996, p.
OJ L 322, 12.12.1996, p.
1. , ki je bilo sprejeto 2. decembra 1996,
1. , adopted on 2 December 1996,
– ob upoštevanju skupnih stališč Sveta 2001/930/SZVP o boju proti terorizmu
– having regard to Council Common Positions 2001/930/CFSP on combating terrorism
OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p.
OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p.
90. in 2001/931/SZVP o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu
90. and 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism
93. z dne 27. decembra 2001 ter Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2580/2001 z dne 27. decembra 2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu
93. , both of 27 December 2001, and Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism
– ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta 2002/402/SZVP o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Osami bin Ladnu, članom organizacije Al-Kaida in talibanom ter drugim osebam, skupinam, podjetjem in entitetam v zvezi z njimi
– having regard to Council Common Position 2002/402/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Osama bin Laden, members of the Al-Qaeda organisation and the Taliban and other individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them
OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p.
OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p.
4. ter Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z Osama bin Ladnom, mrežo Al-Kaida in talibani
4. , and Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban
9. , ki sta bila sprejeta 27. maja 2002,
9. , both of 27 May 2002,
– ob upoštevanju Skupnega seznama vojaškega blaga Evropske unije
– having regard to the Common Military List of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 25. aprila 2002 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o vlogi Evropske unije pri spodbujanju človekovih pravic in demokratizacije v tretjih državah ( KOM(2001)0252 )
– having regard to its resolution of 25 April 2002 on the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the European Union’s role in promoting human rights and democratisation in third countries ( COM(2001)0252 )
OJ L 131 E, 5.6.2003, p.
OJ C 131 E, 5.6.2003, p.
OJ L 290 E, 29.11.2006, p.
OJ C 290 E, 29.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju vseh sporazumov, sklenjenih med Evropsko unijo in tretjimi državami ter klavzul o človekovih pravicah iz teh sporazumov,
– having regard to all the agreements concluded between the European Union and third countries and the human rights clauses contained in these agreements,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. oktobra 1982 o pomenu gospodarskih sankcij, zlasti trgovskega embarga in bojkotiranja, ter njihovih učinkih na zunanje odnose Evropske gospodarske Skupnosti
– having regard to its resolution of 11 October 1982 on the significance of economic sanctions, particularly trade embargoes and boycotts, and their consequences for the EEC’s relations with third countries
OJ L 292, 8.11.1982, p.
OJ C 292, 8.11.1982, p.
– ob upoštevanju resolucije o učinku sankcij in zlasti embargov na prebivalstvo držav, proti katerim so uvedeni ti ukrepi
– having regard to the resolution on the impact of sanctions and, in particular, of embargoes on the people of the countries on which such measures are imposed
AKP-EU 3201/A/01/končno, UL C 78, 2.4.2002, str.
ACP-EU 3201/A/01/fin., OJ C 78, 2.4.2002, p.
32 , ki jo je Skupna parlamentarna skupščina AKP-EU sprejela 1. novembra 2001 v Bruslju (Belgija),
32. , adopted by the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly on 1 November 2001 in Brussels (Belgium),
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA (2007)0381. ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA (2007)0381. ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije 1597 (2008) in priporočila 1824 (2008) o črnih seznamih Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov in Evropske unije, ki jo je sprejela parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope,
– having regard to Resolution 1597 (2008) and Recommendation 1824 (2008) on United Nations Security Council and European Union blacklists, adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe,
– ob upoštevanju lizbonske pogodbe, ki spreminja Pogodbo o Evropski uniji in Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ki je bila podpisana 13. decembra 2007 v Lizboni
– having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007
OJ C 306, 17.12.2007, p.
OJ C 306, 17.12.2007, p.
1. in ki naj bi začela veljati 1. januarja 2009,
1. , which is expected to enter into force on 1 January 2009,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj in Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6-0309/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on International Trade ( A6-0309/2008 ),
A. ker člen 11(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji priznava spoštovanje človekovih pravic kot enega od ciljev skupne zunanje in varnostne politike ter ker novi člen 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, kot ga uvaja člen 1(24) lizbonske pogodbe, priznava, da „Unijo pri njenem delovanju na mednarodni ravni vodijo načela, ki so bila podlaga njenega nastanka, razvoja in širitve ter ki jih želi s svojim delovanjem tudi spodbujati v svetu: demokracija, pravna država, univerzalnost in nedeljivost človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva, enakost in solidarnost ter spoštovanje načel Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov in mednarodnega prava“,
A. whereas Article 11(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) recognises respect for human rights as one of the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), and whereas the new Article 21 of the TEU, as introduced by Article 1(24) of the Treaty of Lisbon, recognises that ‘the Union’s action on the international scene shall be guided by the principles which have inspired its own creation, development and enlargement, and which it seeks to advance in the wider world: democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law’,
B. ker se uporabljajo sankcije za dosego ciljev skupne zunanje in varnostne politike iz člena 11 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki med drugim vključujejo spodbujanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic, demokracije, pravne države in dobrega upravljanja,
B. whereas sanctions are applied in pursuit of specific CFSP objectives set out in Article 11 of the Treaty on European Union, which include, but are not limited to, promoting respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, democracy, the rule of law and good governance,
C. ker Osnovna načela o uporabi omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij) iz leta 2004 predstavljajo prvi pragmatičen dokument, ki določa okvir, v katerem EU izreka sankcije; čeprav EU te dejansko izvaja že od začetka osemdesetih let 20. stoletja in zlasti po začetku veljave Pogodbe o Evropski uniji leta 1993; ker ta dokument uradno določa sankcije kot instrument skupne zunanje in varnostne politike in posledično predstavlja izhodišče evropske politike na področju sankcij,
C. whereas the 2004 Basic Principles on the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions) are the first pragmatic document defining the framework within which the EU imposes sanctions; whereas, however, the EU has in practice been doing so since the early 1980s and, in particular, following the entry into force of the TEU in 1993; whereas that document formally establishes sanctions as an instrument of the CFSP and, as a result, represents the starting point for a European sanctions policy,
E. ker se krepi mednarodno soglasje, da vsaka huda in namerna škoda, povzročena okolju, ogroža svetovni mir in varnost ter predstavlja kršitev človekovih pravic,
E. whereas international consensus is growing that any serious and voluntary damage caused to the environment undermines world peace and security and constitutes a violation of human rights,
F. ker je EU zavezana k sistematičnemu izvajanju sankcij, ki jih je v Poglavju VII listine ZN določil Varnostni svet ZN, in ker hkrati uvaja avtonomne sankcije v odsotnosti mandata Varnostnega sveta ZN v primerih, ko Varnostni svet ZN nima pooblastil za sprejemanje ukrepov ali pa mu je to preprečeno zaradi nesoglasja med njegovimi člani, ker v zvezi s tem poudarja obveznost ZN in EU, da uvajata sankcije v skladu z mednarodnim pravom,
F. whereas the EU is committed to the systematic implementation of sanctions decided on by the UN Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter and at the same time imposes autonomous sanctions in the absence of a UN Security Council mandate, in cases where the UN Security Council is not empowered to take action or is prevented from doing so by a lack of agreement amongst its members; stressing in this regard the obligation incumbent on both the UN and the EU to impose sanctions in conformity with international law,