natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3) zagotavljanje, da zasebni in javni subjekti, telesa ter organi dejansko upoštevajo določbe (izvrševanje).
3) ensuring the actual respect of the provisions by private and public entities, bodies and authorities (enforcement).
Ob upoštevanju teh meril je preiskovalni odbor pridobil dokaze od Komisije.
It is with these benchmarks in mind that the EQUI Committee took evidence from the Commission.
Komisija, ki jo je zastopal vodja enote za zavarovalništvo Elmer TERTAK, je bila navzoča na zaslišanju preiskovalnega odbora 23. marca 2006 (ustni dokazi H1).
Firstly, the Commission, represented by Insurance unit Director Elmer TERTAK, attended the EQUI hearing of 23 March 2006 (oral evidence H1).
Sledile so tudi pisne izmenjave.
Further written exchanges also took place.
Komisar za notranji trg Charlie McCREEVY je dal izjavo 23. novembra 2006 (ustni dokazi H8).
Secondly, the Internal Market Commissioner, Charlie McCREEVY, gave evidence on 23 November 2006 (oral evidence H8).
Med temi izmenjavami je Komisija odgovorila na vprašanja članov in predložila zahtevane dokaze o prenosu zadevnih direktiv in njihovi uporabi s strani pristojnih organov v referenčnem obdobju ter o ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela Komisija v zvezi s spremljanjem izvajanja.
During all these exchanges, the Commission responded to questions asked by Members and presented evidence requested from it on the transposition of the relevant Directives and their application by competent authorities during the reference period, as well as on action taken by the Commission with regard to monitoring implementation.
Ti dokazi vključujejo študijo o izvajanju tretje direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju, ki jo je pripravila odvetniška družba iz Združenega kraljestva Wilde Sapte (WE 20), seznam postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev (WE 19) in seznam vseh dokumentov, povezanih z družbo ELAS, ki jih je imela Komisija, vključno s pismi, elektronsko pošto in raznimi drugimi dokumenti (WE 39).
This evidence includes the implementation study on the 3LD by the UK law firm Wilde Sapte (WE 20), a list of infringement procedures (WE 19) and a list of all documents related to ELAS in the Commission's possession, including letters, e-mails and other miscellaneous documents (WE 39).
Komisija je pripravila tudi dokument o zadevah domačih/tujih držav (WE 41).
A paper on home/host issues was also prepared by the Commission (WE 41).
Zaupni pisni dokazi WE Conf-11 so vključevali tudi dodatne informacije: pregled študije o izvajanju, informacije o identiteti vodilnih uslužbencev v tistem času, informacije o odgovornih osebah v družbi Wilde Sapte in druga vprašanja.
Further information was received in WE Conf-11: the review of the implementation study, information on the identity of officials in charge at the time, information on responsible people at the Wilde Sapte firm, and other issues.
Povzetek tem, ki izhajajo iz ustnih in pisnih dokazov
Summary of themes arising from oral and written evidence
Pravilno in pravočasno izvajanje tretje direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju
Correct and timely implementation of 3LD
Direktor finančnih institucij generalnega direktorata Komisije za notranji trg in storitve Elmér TERTAK je navedel, da je v skladu z zbranimi dokazi „ Združeno kraljestvo tretjo direktivo o življenjskem zavarovanju izvedlo pravočasno in pravilno “ (H1).
Mr. Elmér TERTAK, Director for Financial Institutions in the Internal Market and Services Directorate-General of the Commission, claims that, according to the evidence in his possession, " the UK implemented the 3LD in time and correctly " (H1).
To je dokazalo dejstvo, da je ta država članica „ obvestila generalnega sekretarja Komisije o izvajanju tretje direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju s pismom iz dne 29. junija 1994 “.
This was proven by the fact that that Member State "notified the Secretary-General of the Commission of its implementation of the 3LD by letter dated 29 June 1994 .”
V tem pismu je Združeno kraljestvo navedlo, da bodo izvedbene določbe „ začele veljati 1. julija 1994, ki je rok, naveden v direktivi.
In this letter the UK specified that the implementing provisions “ would enter into force on 1 July 1994, the deadline laid down in the Directive.
Združeno kraljestvo je torej upoštevalo rok za začetek veljavnosti, ki je določen v direktivi, in je pravilno ravnalo pri obveščanju ter predložilo kopije izvedbene zakonodaje.
The UK thus respected the deadline for entry into force laid down in the Directive, and followed the correct practice in its notification and provided copies of the implementing legislation. ”
“ Komisija je skupaj z zunanjimi svetovalci, ki so izdelali poročilo o izvajanju in natančno korelacijsko tabelo, preverila, ali so države članice izpolnile zahteve.
The Commission checked Member States' compliance in conjunction with outside consultants who produced an implementation report and detailed correlation table.
Študijo, ki zajema prenos tretje direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju in direktive o neživljenjskem zavarovanju, je izvedla odvetniška družba Wilde Sapte.
The study covering the transposition of both the 3LD and the non-life Directives was carried out by the law firm Wilde Sapte.
Grčija in Španija vanjo nista bili vključeni.
Greece and Spain were not included.
TERTAK je izjavil, da poročilo ter pregled poročila in izvedbene zakonodaje Združenega kraljestva s strani služb Komisije „ nista pokazala večje vrzeli ali težav v zvezi z izvajanjem v Združenem kraljestvu “ (H1).
Mr TERTAK claims that the report and the Commission services' examination of it and of the UK implementing legislation " did not point to any major gaps or problems as regards UK implementation " (H1).
Komisar McCREEVY je v H8 potrdil, da „ smo ugotovili, da je Združeno kraljestvo pravilno preneslo tretjo direktivo o življenjskem zavarovanju v svojo nacionalno zakonodajo “.
Commissioner McCREEVY in H8 reiterates that "our conclusion was that the UK had correctly transposed the Third Life Assurance Directive into its national legislation."
TERTAK je pojasnil, da Komisija „ nima neposredne vloge pri nadzorovanju posameznih zavarovalnic v državah članicah, da direktive EU o zavarovanju Komisiji ne dodeljujejo posebnih nadzornih pooblastil in da Komisija ne pooblašča ali nadzoruje podjetij, ki se želijo ukvarjati z življenjskim zavarovanjem, temveč da je posamezna država članica odgovorna za to, da organizira in izvaja to nacionalno nadzorno odgovornost “ (H1).
Mr TERTAK clarified that the Commission " has no direct role in the supervision of individual insurance undertakings in Member States and that EU insurance directives do not confer specific supervisory powers upon the Commission, nor does the Commission authorise and supervise undertakings wishing to write insurance business, and that it falls to the responsibility of each Member State to organise and effect this national supervisory responsibility " (H1).
Naloga Komisije je zagotoviti, da države članice pri izvajanju teh nadzornih pooblastil upoštevajo svoje obveznosti v skladu z zadevnimi direktivami ES in ne ovirajo pravilnega delovanja notranjega trga.
The task of the Commission is to ensure that, in exercising these supervisory powers, Member States respect their obligations under the relevant EC directives and do not hinder the proper functioning of the internal market.
Komisija lahko začne uradni postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev le v primeru neizpolnjevanja teh obveznosti v skladu s Pogodbo.
Only where there is a failure to fulfil these obligations under the Treaty is the Commission allowed to open formal infringement proceedings.
Komisar McCREEVY je opisal težave, ki jih ima včasih Komisija (H8): „ Preverjanje izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti s strani držav članic težka naloga.
Commissioner McCREEVY describes the difficulties the Commission faces sometimes (H8): "Checking Member States’ implementation of Community legislation is a difficult exercise.
Zahteva veliko časa in sredstev.
It is time and resource-intensive.
Obstajajo jezikovne težave.
There are linguistic problems.
Prevodi niso vedno na voljo.
Translations are not always available.
To je naloga nacionalnih organov.
That is the job of the national authorities.
Prav tako ne moremo nadzorovati nacionalnih nadzornikov in zagotavljati, da pravilno opravljajo svoje delo.
Nor can we stand behind the national supervisors to make sure they are doing their job properly.
Kot smo s sodelavci že navedli, Komisija ni in ne more biti nadzornica nadzornikov.“
As I and my officials have stated before, the Commission is not and cannot be the supervisor of the supervisors."
Postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev: manjši postopki so bili sproženi, vendar so zdaj zaključeni
Infringement procedures: minor ones were launched but are now closed
TERTAK je v H1 izjavil, da Komisija trenutno ni seznanjena z nobeno kršitvijo direktiv EU o zavarovanju v zvezi z družbo ELAS ter da ne more zavzeti dokončnega stališča o tem, ali je pri dejanskem izvajanju direktive v primeru ELAS prišlo do kršitev; čeprav bi lahko zavzela takšno stališče in bi bila prepričana, da je dejansko prišlo do kršitve, ne bi mogla začeti postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev na Sodišču zaradi vloge Komisije in narave postopka za ugotavljanje kršitve v skladu s pogodbo, kot jo razlaga Sodišče.
Mr. TERTAK claims in H1 that at the present time, the Commission is not aware of any infringement of the EU insurance directives in connection with ELAS and that they are not in a position to take a definitive view on whether there might have been an infringement in the practical application of the directive in the case of ELAS and, even if they were able to take such a view and were convinced that there had been an infringement in practice, it would not be able to take infringement proceedings before the Court, on account of the Commission's role and of the nature of infringement proceedings under the Treaty as interpreted by the Court of Justice.
TERTAK je rekel tudi, „ da večina kršitev na ravni GD za notranji trg in storitve, kolikor mi je znano, obstaja ker (...) tisti, ki menijo, da nekaj ne poteka pravilno, pridejo na Komisijo ter nas s tem seznanijo .
Mr TERTAK expanded by saying " that most of infringements at DG Markt level, to my best knowledge are there because (…) those who believe that something is derailing from the line are coming to the Commission, bringing to our knowledge that something is going wrong.
Seveda takoj, ko dobimo dokaze in pojasnilo, da kršitve pravil dejansko obstajajo, sprejmemo ukrepe; vendar po drugi strani nismo upravičeni do tega, da skrbimo za red poleg tega za nas veljajo omejitve, kot jih je navedlo Sodišče, in znotraj teh omejitev moramo delovati. “
Of course, the minute we do get evidence and a clarification that there indeed there is a breach of the rules, we are taking actions; but on the other hand we are not entitled to be a police and we do have the limitation I quoted from the Court and within that boundaries we have to act. "
BEVERLY iz Komisije je pojasnil, da kršitev „ ni le prestopek, ampak prestopek, ki je povezan s kršitvijo zakonodaje Skupnosti, vendar je to spet nekaj, za kar so potrebni dokazi.
Mr. BEVERLY from the Commission clarifies that infringement " is not a simply wrongdoing, but if this wrongdoing is really related to breach of Community law and this is however again something which needs evidence.
Če povzamemo, kolikor mi je bilo takrat znano, nismo imeli nobenih dokazov, da bi lahko začeli kakršne koli postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, in kolikor nam je bilo takrat znano, nismo prejeli nobenih pritožb, ki bi k temu kazale, da je treba začeti postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev proti Združenemu kraljestvu, ker v zvezi z družbo Equitable Life ni ravnalo v skladu s pravili iz tretje direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju. “
To summarize, we did not have any evidence to my best knowledge at that time, that we could have started any infringement procedures and we didn't receive any complaints, again to our best of knowledge at that time, which would have initiated that any infringements procedures should have been started against the UK for not complying in relation with Equitable Life with the prescription of the Third Life Directive. "
Vendar je Komisija odboru poslala seznam postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev (WE 19), ki so se začeli zoper države članice glede tretje direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju.
However, the Commission sent the committee a list of the infringement procedures (WE 19) that had been opened with Member States with regards to the 3LD.
Na tem seznamu je navedeno, da „ se je proti več državam članicam, vključno z Združenim kraljestvom, začel postopek zaradi nepravilne uporabe v zvezi s posebnimi vidiki njihovih nacionalnih ukrepov.
This list states that " proceedings for incorrect application were launched against a number of Member States, including the UK , with regard to specific aspects of their national measures.
Pomanjkanje pritožb Komisiji pred letom 2001 – Komisija ne more ukrepati proti domnevnim preteklim kršitvam, ki so bile odpravljene
Absence of complaints to the Commission before 2001 - The Commission cannot act against alleged past infringements that have been corrected
TERTAK je na zaslišanju pojasnil, da dejstva ne obstajajo formalno, če se ne predložijo Komisiji pravočasno.
Mr. TERTAK, under questioning, clarified that when facts are not brought to the Commission's attention in due time, formally they do not exist.
To velja za primer ELAS, o katerem takrat nihče ni obvestil Komisije.
This applies to the ELAS case, where, at the time, no-one notified the Commission.
Vendar je treba upoštevati, da lahko Komisija pridobi informacije na drug način.
However, it should be borne in mind that the Commission can obtain information in other ways.
Glede korespondence v zvezi z ELAS, ki jo ima Komisija, je TERTAK v H1 izjavil, da „ je prva korespondenca, ki se pojavi v dokumentih Komisije, iz začetka leta 2001, in sicer pisma poslancev Evropskega parlamenta Jamesa Ellesa in Roya Perryja.
On the issue of correspondence on ELAS in the Commission's possession, Mr TERTAK claims in H1 that " the earliest correspondence that appears on the Commission's files dates from early 2001, with letters from Mr James Elles MEP and Mr Roy Perry MEP.
Perry je ponovno pisal komisarju Bolkesteinu julija 2001 po razpadu družbe Independent Insurance Company in po odločitvi družbe Equitable Life, da bo za 16 % zmanjšala vrednost pokojninskih polic.
Mr Perry wrote again to Commissioner Bolkestein in July 2001 following the collapse of the Independent Insurance Company and following Equitable Life's decision to cut pension policy values by 16%.
Perry je Komisijo vprašal, ali je prepričana, da so bile v teh zadevah upoštevane evropske direktive.
Mr Perry asked the Commission whether it was satisfied that the European directives had been adhered to in these matters. "
“ TERTAK je dodal, da bo Komisija v arhivskem gradivu še naprej iskala izmenjave pred tem datumom.
Mr. TERTAK then went on to say that the Commission will continue to search in its historical archives for exchanges prior to that date.
Komisar McCREEVY je v H8 izpostavil naslednja dejstva: „Komisija ni izvedela za težave družbe Equitable Life do začetka leta 2001, ko so nas poslanci parlamenta začeli obveščati v imenu volivcev, ki so bili zavarovanci družbe Equitable Life.
Commissioner McCREEVY, in H8, reiterates these facts: "The Commission did not become aware of the problems of Equitable Life until early 2001, when Members of this Parliament began to contact us on behalf of their constituents who were Equitable policyholders.
Zagotovili smo vam celoten seznam vseh naših dokumentov o družbi Equitable Life.
We have provided you with a full list of all our documents on Equitable Life.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so se po krizi družbe Equitable Life in prenehanju sklepanja novih poslov hitro odzvali.
The UK authorities reacted quickly following the Society’s crisis and closure to new business.
Na podlagi Bairdovega poročila in Tinerjevih reform je Združeno kraljestvo temeljito spremenilo pravila o življenjskem zavarovanju na splošno, zlasti za police za življenjsko zavarovanje s klavzulo o soudeležbi pri dobičku zavarovalnice, o vzajemnih družbah in vlogi aktuarja.
On the basis of the Baird Report and the Tiner Reforms, the United Kingdom has radically changed its rules on life assurance in general, on with-profits policies in particular, on mutuals and on the role of the actuary.
Mislim, da lahko zagotovo rečemo, da ureditev, ki je veljala pred krizo družbe Equitable Life, ne obstaja več.“
I think one can safely say that the regime that applied prior to the crisis at Equitable Life no longer exists."
V zvezi z vprašanjem vključenosti Komisije je Clive MAXWELL v H4 izjavil, da v zvezi z „ vključenostjo Komisije v nadaljnje spremljanje družbe Equitable Life pred seboj nimam nobenih podrobnosti o kakršni koli vključenosti Evropske komisije v prevzemanje posameznih primerov “.
With regard to the issue of Commission involvement, Clive MAXWELL in H4 states that on the issue of "the involvement of the Commission in the follow-up to Equitable Life, I have no details in front of me of any involvement of the European Commission in taking up individual cases".
V zvezi s podobnim vprašanjem je Komisija vztrajala, da ne more izraziti mnenja ali raziskati kršitev, ki so jih zadevne države članice odpravile.
On a related point, the Commission insisted that it could not express an opinion or investigate infringements that have been remedied by the Member State concerned.
Razlog za to je narava postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, katerih cilj je le zagotoviti skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
This was due to the nature of infringement proceedings, whose objective was merely to ensure compliance with EU law.
Žrtve preteklih kršitev bi lahko še vedno preverile skladnost ravnanja držav članic na nacionalnih sodiščih.
Victims of past infringements could still test the compatibility of the Member State's conduct through national courts.
Člani so izrazili začudenje nad tem, da ni nobene možnosti za ponoven začetek postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev ali preiskavo preteklih kršitev, zlasti ko je negativen vpliv teh kršitev ugotovljen šele pozneje.
Members expressed astonishment that there is no way to reopen infringement cases or investigate past infringements, especially when the detrimental effect of those infringements is only revealed at a later stage.
Končno, Alan BEVERLY iz Komisije je v H7 zagovarjal dejanja ustanove in ponovno navedel mnenje TERTAKA, saj je izjavil, da „ ni vloga Komisije, da nadzoruje nadzornike.
Finally, Alan BEVERLY from the Commission, in H7, defends his institution's actions, reiterating Mr TERTAK's views, by saying that the "the role of the Commission is not to be a supervisor of the supervisors.
To ni naš mandat in tega preprosto ne moremo storiti.
It is not our mandate and we cannot possibly do that.
Že prej smo povedali, da smo, potem ko se preveri, da je v državah članicah izvajanje opravljeno, dejansko odvisni od pritožb ali pisem državljanov, saj na ta način izvemo, da nekaj poteka narobe.
We have said to you before that, having checked that implementation has been carried out in Member States, we are then virtually dependent on complaints or letters from citizens to have an idea of whether something is going wrong.
Kot smo vam sporočili, nismo bili obveščeni o nobenih težavah pred prvimi prejetimi pismi, ki so bila poslana leta 2001 po prenehanju sklepanja novih poslov [...]
Again, as we have informed you, we were not informed of any problems before the earliest letters we received, which were sent in 2001, after the closure to new business [...]
Zakaj o tem nismo slišali nič pred letom 2001?
Why did we not hear anything before 2001?
Najbrž zato, ker so v devetdesetih letih 20. stoletja tisti, ki so zapustili družbo Equitable Life, odšli z dobrim plačilom in niso imeli nobenega razloga, da bi se pritožili.“
It was probably because in the 1990s people leaving Equitable Life left with generous payments and had no reason whatsoever to complain".
Poročila o izvajanju, ki jih je sestavila družba iz Združenega kraljestva
Implementation reports done by UK firm
Komisija je na zahtevo članov odbora zagotovila t.i. poročila o izvajanju tretje direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju.
At the request of committee members, the Commission provided the so-called implementation reports of the 3LD.
Poročilo je sestavila zasebna odvetniška družba iz Združenega kraljestva Wilde Sapte.
The report was produced by a UK private law firm called Wilde Sapte.
Poročilo vsebuje celoten povzetek in devet korelacijskih poročil posameznih držav.
The report includes an overall summary as well as nine individual country correlation reports.
Komisija je navedla, da se je direktiva v dveh državah izvajala prepozno, da bi lahko bilo to vključeno v poročilo.
The Commission states that the Directive was implemented too late in two countries to be caught by the report.
VAN HULLE iz Komisije je razložil, da je potekal običajen javni razpis za izbiro družbe in da je bila družba izbrana za pripravo študije o celotni EU, kar vključuje tudi Združeno kraljestvo; na žalost je prišlo do take povezave, vendar med izvajanjem študije zadeva ELAS še ni bila ugotovljena.
Mr. VAN HULLE from the Commission, explained that the usual public tender was followed in order to select the firm, and that it was selected to do a study on the whole of the EU, which also includes the UK; it is unfortunate that there was such a linkage, but at the time that the study was carried out the ELAS affair had not arisen.
Komisija „ponavadi poskuša izbrati družbo, ki ima stike v vseh državah članicah“ (H1), za kar se je treba zelo potruditi.
The Commission " tries to select usually a firm which has contacts in all the Members States " (H1), a difficult endeavour.
Komisar MCCREEVY (H8) je poleg tega pojasnil, „ kako smo preverili izvajanje tretje generacije direktiv o življenjskem zavarovanju v letih 1994–1995, pri čemer smo delno uporabili študijo, ki smo jo naročili pri znani odvetniški družbi.
Commissioner MCCREEVY (H8) also explained how " how we checked the implementation of the third generation of insurance directives back in 1994-95 using in part a study commissioned from a well-known law firm.
Na voljo smo dali poročila o študiji in lastne notranje dokumente, ki jasno kažejo, s kakšnimi težavami smo se srečevali.
We have made available to you the study reports and our own internal papers which show clearly the problems encountered.
Ti dokumenti kažejo tudi veliko prizadevanje uradnikov Komisije, da bi dosegli cenovno primernost in najboljše možne rezultate.“
Those papers also show the considerable efforts of Commission officials to achieve value for money and obtain the best possible result."
Prenos: Komisija lahko vidi le trenutno stanje
Transposition: Commission can only view a 'snapshot'
TERTAK je na zaslišanju priznal, da lahko pri analizi prenosa direktive „ dobiš le vpogled v trenutno stanje v določenem trenutku, kar ne zajema samodejno tega, kaj se bo zgodilo pozneje (…).
Mr. TERTAK, under questioning, admitted that when analysing the transposition of a directive " you can just get a snapshot of any given time which not automatically covers what will happen afterwards (…).
Ne smemo pozabiti, da nacionalni parlamenti izvajajo tudi določen nadzor nad vsemi institucijami, zlasti tistimi, ki imajo nadzorna pooblastila, in bi lahko pričakovali, da demokratičen parlament zadošča za pregled delovanja institucij in njihovih meja ter pregled, ali ta zakon izpolnjujejo, saj direktive prenašajo njihovi nacionalni zakoni.
We should not forget that above all institutions, especially those which do have supervisory powers, the National Parliaments are also exercising a certain supervision, and one would expect the democratic Parliament is sufficient to overview institutional acting in their boundaries, and whether they are fulfilling that law, since the directives are being transposed by their national laws. "