natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju ukrepov, ki so namenjeni krepitvi ohranjanja narave in biotske raznovrstnosti ter so del „pregleda stanja SKP“, in priložnosti, ki jih zagotavlja reforma skupne kmetijske politike, ki je predmet sedanjih razprav,
– having regard to the measures aiming at enhancing nature conservation and biodiversity forming part of the ‘Health check of the CAP’ and the opportunities offered by the reform of the CAP currently being discussed,
– ob upoštevanju dejstva, da so Združeni narodi razglasili leto 2010 za leto biotske raznovrstnosti,
– having regard to the fact that the United Nations has declared 2010 the Year of Biodiversity,
– ob upoštevanju izida 15. konference pogodbenic (COP 15) Konvencije o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prostoživečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES), ki je potekala v Dohi v Qatarju od 13. do 25. marca 2010,
– having regard to the outcome of the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which took place in Doha, Qatar, from 13 to 25 March 2010,
– ob upoštevanju prihajajoče pete konference pogodbenic, na kateri se bodo sestale pogodbenice Kartagenskega protokola o biološki varnosti (COP-MOP 5), in konference pogodbenic (COP 10) Konvencije ZN o biološki raznovrstnosti,
– having regard to the upcoming fifth meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (COP-MOP 5) and the Conference of the Parties (COP 10) of the UN Convention on Biodiversity (CBD),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Evropske agencije za okolje št. 4/2009 z naslovom „Progress towards the European 2010 biodiversity target“ (Napredek pri uresničevanju evropskega cilja v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo za leto 2010), zlasti priloge „SEBI 2010 Biodiversity indicator“ (Kazalnik biotske raznovrstnosti SEBI 2010),
– having regard to EEA Report No 4/2009 ‘Progress towards the European 2010 biodiversity target’, in particular the annex ‘SEBI 2010 Biodiversity indicator’,
– ob upoštevanju smernic Komisije z naslovom Smernice za vzpostavitev omrežja Natura 2000 v morskem okolju – uporaba direktive o habitatih in pticah (maj 2007),
– having regard to the Commission Guidance document ‘Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment – Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives’ (May 2007),
– ob upoštevanju strategije EU 2020,
– having regard to the EU 2020 strategy,
– ob upoštevanju tretje napovedi Združenih narodov o svetovni biotski raznovrstnosti,
– having regard to the third United Nations Global Biodiversity Outlook,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za ribištvo in Odbora za peticije ( A7‑0241/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Fisheries and the Committee on Petitions ( A7‑0241/2010 ),
A. ker bi morala evropska zakonodaja vplivati na biotsko raznovrstnost, npr. z okvirno direktivo o vodah (2000/60/ES) ali okvirno direktivo o morski strategiji (2008/56/ES),
A. whereas EU law‑making should have an impact on biodiversity, as was the case with the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2008/56/EC),
B. ker je iz sporočil Komisije postalo jasno, da EU do leta 2010 ni izpolnila cilja v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo,
B. whereas it has become clear from the Commission’s communications that the EU has not met its 2010 biodiversity target,
C. ker pregled vrst in habitatnih tipov, ki so zaščiteni v skladu z direktivo o habitatih, kaže, da je stanje ohranjenosti večine vrst in habitatnih tipov slabo, da je stopnja izumiranja izredno visoka – po nekaterih ocenah se je stopnja biotske raznovrstnosti v zadnjih 40 letih zmanjšala za 30 % – in da dejavnikov izredno visoke izgube biotske raznovrstnosti, kot kaže, ne bo nič manj; ker habitate in vrste, ki so za EU pomembni, potencialno ogrožajo antropogene podnebne spremembe; ker znanstveniki ocenjujejo, da je veliko še neznanih vrst, zaradi česar je nemogoče določiti celoten obseg izgube biotske raznovrstnosti,
C. whereas the health check of species and habitat types protected under the Habitats Directive shows that a majority of species and habitat types have an unfavourable conservation status, that the extinction rate is disturbingly high – according to certain estimates the biodiversity rate has fallen by 30% in the last 40 years – and that the drivers of excessive biodiversity loss show no evidence of declining; whereas habitats and species of EU interest are potentially threatened by anthropogenic climate change; whereas scientists estimate there are many unrecorded species, making it impossible to gauge the full extent of biodiversity loss,
D. ker je več dejavnikov preprečilo, da bi EU dosegla svoj cilj do leta 2010, na primer nezmožnost, da bi priznali in obravnavali gonilne sile, ki povzročajo zmanjšanje biotske raznovrstnosti, nepopolno izvajanje zakonodaje, nepopolno in slabo vključevanje v sektorske politike, nezadostno strokovno znanje in pomanjkljivi podatki, nezadostna politična volja, nezadostno financiranje ter pomanjkanje dodatnih učinkovito usmerjenih instrumentov za reševanje posebnih težav, kot so invazivne tuje vrste,
D. whereas several factors have prevented the EU from achieving its 2010 target, such as the failure to recognise and deal with the driving forces behind the reduction in biological diversity, incomplete implementation of legislation, incomplete and poor integration into sectoral policies, insufficient scientific knowledge and data gaps, lack of political will, insufficient funding, lack of additional efficiently-targeted instruments to tackle specific problems such as invasive alien species,
E. ker je biotska raznovrstnost, ki je naravni svetovni kapital, neposredno in tudi posredno z ekosistemskimi storitvami, ki jih zagotavlja, bistvenega pomena za obstoj človeškega življenja na Zemlji in socialno blaginjo; ker ima biotska raznovrstnost osrednjo vlogo v svetovnem boju proti lakoti in prispeva k zanesljivi preskrbi s hrano; ker sta ohranjanje in trajnostna raba biotske raznovrstnosti eden od pogojev za ublažitev podnebnih sprememb in prilaganje nanje,
E. whereas biodiversity, as the world’s natural capital, is essential to the existence of human life on Earth and societies’ well-being, both directly and indirectly through the ecosystem services it provides; whereas biodiversity plays a central role in the global fight against hunger and in favour of food security; whereas conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity is one prerequisite for mitigation of and adaptation to climate change,
F. ker je biološka biotska raznovrstnost nenadomestljiv temelj, na katerem se je razvilo človeštvo, in ker njena izguba ter spremljajoča izguba naravne dediščine ustvarjata neravnovesje in povzročata znatne gospodarske izgube in zmanjšanje blaginje v enaki razsežnosti kot stroški nedejavnosti na področju podnebnih sprememb,
F. whereas biological biodiversity is the irreplaceable pillar on which mankind has evolved and its loss and that of the natural heritage it brings with it creates disequilibrium and gives rise to substantial economic and welfare losses, of the same order of magnitude as the cost of inaction on climate change,
G. ker po podatkih raziskave o ekonomiki ekosistemov in biotski raznovrstnosti (TEEB) izguba biotske raznovrstnosti povzroča znatne gospodarske izgube in zmanjšanje blaginje,
G. whereas the study on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) also confirms that the loss of biodiversity gives rise to substantial economic and welfare losses,
H. ker nedavna raziskava Eurobarometer kaže, da mnogim državljanom EU niso znani pomen izraza biotska raznovrstnost in posledice izgube biotske raznovrstnosti,
H. whereas a recent study by Eurobarometer shows that EU citizens are largely unfamiliar with the term biodiversity and the consequences of the loss of biodiversity,
I. ker bi lahko izginjanje vrst prekinilo prehranjevalno verigo, ki je ključna za preživetje drugih vrst živali in sort rastlin, ki so bistvene za proizvodnjo živil, prilagajanje podnebnim razmeram, odpornost proti zunanjim vplivom ter ohranjanje genetskih vrednosti,
I. whereas the disappearance of species may break the food chain that is key to the survival of other animal and plant species of vital importance for food production, adaptation to climatic conditions, resistance to external agents and the preservation of genetic values,
1. je zelo zaskrbljen nad zelo hitrimi izgubami biotske raznovrstnosti, ki jih povzroča človek in ki bodo s tempom zadnjih desetletij do leta 2050 zelo osiromašile naravo in ji prizadejale nepopravljivo škodo in poudarja, da je delovanje ekosistemov eden od pogojev za naš obstanek;
Is deeply concerned about the very fast pace of human-induced biodiversity loss which, if it continues as in the last decades, will leave us with a greatly impoverished and irreversibly damaged nature by 2050 and underlines that functioning ecosystems are a prerequisite for our subsistence;
EU in biotska raznovrstnost
The EU and biodiversity
12. poudarja, da se že izvajajo dragocene pobude za obnovitev biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemskih storitev, in meni, da morajo biti tudi te dejavnosti del glavnega cilja za leto 2020;
Points to the valuable initiatives aimed at restoring biodiversity and ecosystem services already taking place and believes that such restoration activities must also be part of the 2020 headline target;
15. poleg tega poudarja, da mora politika, namenjena varstvu in izboljšanju biotske raznovrstnosti, vključevati skupno politiko EU za obravnavanje problematike invazivnih tujih vrst ter poudarja tesno povezavo med prometnimi koridorji in obsežnim vnosom tujih vrst;
Underlines furthermore that, as a part of a policy aimed at protecting and improving biodiversity, a common EU policy to tackle the problem of invasive alien species is necessary, and points out the particularly close link between transport corridors and the large-scale introduction of alien species;
27. opozarja Komisijo in države članice, da direktiva o morski strategiji ne omejuje uporabe zaščitenih morskih območij na Naturo 2000, in zato zahteva, da države članice in Komisija upoštevajo ter medsebojno povežejo vsa zaščitena morska območja, vključno s tistimi, ki jih določajo konvencije o regionalnih morjih, da bi ustvarile povezano in celovito omrežje;
Reminds the Commission and Member States that the Marine Strategy Directive does not limit the use of marine protected areas to Natura 2000, and therefore requests that Member States and the Commission take account of and create linkages between all marine protected areas, including those designated under regional seas conventions, with the aim of creating a coherent and comprehensive network;
29. glede na razlike med državami članicami poziva Komisijo, naj dodatno pojasni direktive ali zagotovi potrebne smernice, pri čemer naj pojasnitev ali smernice po možnosti temeljijo na najboljših praksah in/ali naj jih te odražajo;
Given these differences between Member States, invites the Commission to provide further clarification of the Directives or guidance where necessary, with such clarification or guidance ideally being based on and/or illustrated by best practices;
34. meni, da bi čezmejno sodelovanje lahko pomembno prispevalo k uresničitvi ciljev Natura 2000;
Believes that better cross-border cooperation could have significant benefits for meeting the Natura 2000 objectives;
38. zato poziva Komisijo, naj z namenom vzajemne krepitve zagotovi nadaljnje povezovanje biotske raznovrstnosti z drugimi političnimi področji EU, kot so kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo, ribištvo, regionalna politika in kohezija, promet, turizem, razvojno sodelovanje ter raziskave in inovacije ter naj bolje uskladi sektorske in proračunske politike EU; poudarja obstoj velikih priložnosti, zlasti v skupni kmetijski politiki, regionalni politiki in skupni ribiški politiki, da bi dali biotski raznovrstnosti večji pomen;
Therefore, calls on the Commission to ensure a further mainstreaming of biodiversity into other EU policy areas – such as agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional policy and cohesion, energy, industry, transport tourism, development cooperation, research and innovation – in a mutually reinforcing way and to make the European Union’s sectoral and budgetary policies more consistent; stresses the great opportunities that exist, particularly in the common agricultural policy, regional policy and the common fisheries policy, to give biodiversity a higher priority;
40. meni, da imajo kmetje pomembno vlogo pri uresničevanju cilja EU v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo; poudarja, da je bila leta 1992 dana pobuda za vključitev zaščite biotske raznovrstnosti v skupno kmetijsko politiko in da so bili nato z reformo leta 2003 uvedeni ukrepi, kot so navzkrižna skladnost, enotno plačilo na kmetijo (nevezanost) in razvoj podeželja, ki koristijo biotski raznovrstnosti;
Takes the view that farmers play a vital role in achieving the EU’s biodiversity objective; points out that in 1992 an initial impetus was given to integrating protection of biodiversity into the common agricultural policy (CAP), and that subsequently the 2003 reform has introduced measures such as cross compliance, the single farm payment (decoupling) and rural development which have benefits for biodiversity;
42. poudarja, da je kmetijska in gozdarska dejavnost v Evropi bistveno prispevala k raznovrstnosti vrst in biotopov ter zelo raznoliki kmetijski krajini, ki zdaj veljajo za potrebne zaščite; zato poudarja, da je kmetijsko krajino in biotsko raznovrstnost v Evropi dolgoročno mogoče ohraniti le s kmetijsko in gozdarsko dejavnostjo;
Points out that agricultural and forestry-related activity in Europe has contributed substantially to a diversity of species and biotopes and a varied agricultural landscape now considered in need of protection; underlines, therefore, that in the long term it is only through agricultural and forestry-related activity that the agricultural landscape can be retained and biological diversity conserved in Europe;
48. poudarja, da je pomembno zaustaviti in obrniti upad biotske raznovrstnosti gojenih vrst in sort rastlin, ki vodi v zmanjševanje genetske osnove, na kateri temelji prehrana ljudi in živali; poudarja, da je treba spodbujati uporabo tradicionalnih kmetijskih sort, značilnih za določene regije;
Stresses the importance of halting and reversing the decline in the diversity of cultivated plant species and varieties, which leads to the erosion of the genetic basis on which human and animal nutrition depends; underlines the need to promote the use of traditional agricultural varieties specific to certain regions;
51. ugotavlja, da je bil v okoljski zakonodaji dosežen velik napredek, npr. z uvedbo celostnega zatiranja škodljivcev ter novo zakonodajo EU o pesticidih, ki omogoča posebno varstvo rastlin, pri čemer se zatirajo škodljivci in ščitijo koristni organizmi;
Notes that much progress has been made in environmental legislation, such as the introduction of integrated pest management and the new EU pesticide legislation, which makes it possible for pest management to target harmful organisms, thereby protecting beneficial organisms
55. meni, da so za upravljanje ribiških dejavnosti in zagotavljanje odgovornega ribolova na odprtem morju pristojne regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva; zato ocenjuje, da je nujno okrepiti njihove pristojnosti, zlasti glede nadzora in odvračilnih kazni, ter da morajo zlasti regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva biti odgovorne za upravljanje staležev nekaterih komercialno pomembnih vrst rib in zahtevati uporabo potrdil o ulovu;
Considers that regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) are responsible for the management of fisheries and guarantors of responsible fishing on the high seas; considers that it is therefore essential to strengthen their powers, in particular with regard to controls and deterrent penalties, and that it is first and foremost up to RFMOs to manage the stocks of certain marine species of commercial importance and to require the use of catch certificates;
58. poziva države članice, naj oblikujejo gozdarsko politiko tako, da bo v celoti upoštevala vlogo gozda kot rezerve za biotsko raznovrstnost, ohranjanje in nastajanje tal, skladiščenje ogljika in čiščenje zraka ter za rekreacijo naših državljanov;
Urges Member States to design their forestry policy in a way that takes fully into account the role of forests as a reserve for biodiversity, soil retention and formation, carbon sequestration and air purification characteristics and for purposes of recreation for our citizens;
60. poudarja, da naraščajoče povpraševanje po biogorivih ter posledično povečanje pritiska za njihovo proizvodnjo ogrožata biotsko raznovrstnost, zlasti v državah v razvoju, kar povzroča degradacijo in spreminjanje habitatov in ekosistemov, kot so mokrišča in gozdovi;
Points out that growing demand for agri-fuels and the consequent intensification of pressure for their production are threatening biodiversity, notably in developing countries, owing to the degradation and conversion of habitats and ecosystems such as wetlands and forests, among others;
62. navaja, da Svet v odstavku 8 svojih sklepov z dne 21. oktobra 2009 poziva Komisijo, naj za vsak posamezen sektor nujno pregleda subvencije, ki imajo negativne posledice za okolje; poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma ukrepa v skladu s temi sklepi, da bi se izognili subvencijam za ukrepe, ki imajo negativne posledice za evropsko biotsko raznovrstnost;
Notes that paragraph 8 of the Council conclusions of 21 October 2009 invites the Commission to undertake an urgent sector-by-sector review of subsidies which have an adverse environmental impact; calls on the Commission to act on those conclusions immediately in order to avoid subsidies to policies which have a negative impact on European biodiversity;
64. poudarja velik pomen biotske raznovrstnosti in odpornih ekosistemov za ublažitev podnebnih sprememb in prilagoditev nanje, ob upoštevanju, da kopenski in morski ekosistemi zdaj vsrkavajo približno polovico antropogenih emisij CO 2 ;
Underlines the vital importance of biodiversity and resilient ecosystems for climate change mitigation and adaptation, given the fact that terrestrial and marine ecosystems currently absorb around half of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions;
67. meni, da imajo tla pomembno vlogo pri uresničevanju cilja EU v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo; se zaveda, da ima degradacija tal primarno lokalne in regionalne vzroke in posledice ter da bi bilo posledično treba upoštevati načelo subsidiarnosti; poziva države članice, naj izpolnijo svoje obveznosti glede zagotavljanja kakovosti tal in poskrbijo za dobro stanje tal ter poziva tiste države članice, ki nimajo zakonodaje o varstvu tal, naj prevzamejo svojo odgovornost;
Underlines that soil plays a vital role in achieving the EU’s biodiversity objective; recognises that soil degradation has primarily local and regional causes and impact, and that the principle of subsidiarity should consequently be respected; calls on all Member States to fulfil their obligations in terms of guaranteeing soil quality and keep the soil in good condition and urges those Member States without soil protection legislation to shoulder their responsibilities;
70. poleg tega močno verjame, da so lahko in morajo biti učinkovitost virov, trajnostni gospodarski razvoj in ohranjanje narave usklajeni; zlasti poudarja razvoj ekološkega in kmečkega turizma, kjer se rekreacija in ohranjanje medsebojno krepita;
Furthermore, strongly believes that resource efficiency, sustainable economic development and nature conservation can and should go hand in hand; draws particular attention to the development of eco- and agri-tourism, whereby recreation and conservation are mutually reinforcing;
72. je seznanjen z oceno Komisije iz leta 2004, da bodo letni stroški za upravljanje omrežja Natura 2000 znašali 6,1 milijarde EUR; vendar opozarja, da je v skladu s poročilom TEEB donos naložb v ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti do stokrat višji;
Takes note of the Commission’s estimates in 2004 for the annual cost of managing the Natura 2000 network at EUR 6.1 billion; points out however, that according to the TEEB report, the return on biodiversity conservation investment is up to a hundred times more;
74. meni, da bi morala Skupnost prevzeti večjo odgovornost za zaščito naravnih vrednot v omrežju Natura 2000, zlasti v smislu financiranja;
Believes that the Community should take greater responsibility for safeguarding natural values in the Natura 2000 network, particularly in the context of funding;
78. zato poudarja, da je potreben boljši vpogled v učinkovitost porabe za ohranitev biotske raznovrstnosti, in poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi primere dobre prakse v zvezi z učinkovitostjo in dodano vrednostjo;
Therefore, underlines the need to gain greater insight into the effectiveness of biodiversity spending and calls on the Commission to provide examples of good practice in terms of effectiveness and added value;
80. z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je število projektov, financiranih iz programa LIFE+, v več državah članicah vsako leto pod okvirno dodelitvijo; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni razloge za to nezadostno izvajanje ter po potrebi predlaga spremembe pravil za ta program, zlasti v zvezi z ravnmi financiranja;
Notes with concern that the number of projects financed under the LIFE+ programme each year is below the indicative allocation in various Member States; invites the Commission to assess the reasons for this under-implementation and where necessary to propose changes to the rules governing the programme, particularly as regards co‑financing levels;
Baza podatkov in znanja
D ata and knowledge base
88. glede na trenutno pomanjkljivo poznavanje pomena biotske raznovrstnosti v širši javnosti pozdravlja informativno kampanjo Komisije in poziva države članice, naj bistveno povečajo prizadevanja za večjo ozaveščenost in izmenjavo najboljših praks;
Given the current lack of knowledge among the general public about the importance of biodiversity, welcomes the Commission’s information campaign and calls on the Member States to substantially increase their awareness-raising efforts and best practice exchanges;
91. poziva Komisijo, naj podpre ustanovitev medvladne platforme za politike na področju biotske raznovrstnosti in vede o ekosistemskih storitvah pod okriljem okoljskega programa Združenih narodov ter naj pomaga ustanoviti to platformo;
Urges the Commission to support the creation of an intergovernmental platform for policies in the field of biodiversity and ecosystem services science, under the auspices of the United Nations Environment Programme, and to help create that platform;
93. poudarja, da krčenje gozdov povzroča več emisij CO 2 kot celoten prometni sektor in da je ohranjanje gozdov eden od bistvenih elementov ohranjanja biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemskih storitev na svetovni ravni;
Points out that deforestation accounts for more CO 2 emissions than the whole transport sector and that conservation of forests is one of the core elements for the global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services;
Na eni strani je ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemov ter preprečevanje njihove nadaljnje degradacije neprecenljivega pomena za družbo.
On the one hand, maintaining biodiversity and ecosystems and preventing them from degrading further is invaluable to society.
Zaustavitev izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti ni le naša etična dolžnost – pojem skrbništva nas obvezuje, da ohranjamo planet tak, da bodo lahko na njem živele tudi prihodnje generacije.
Halting the loss of biodiversity is not only our ethical duty – the concept of stewardship obliges us to maintain our planet in such a way that it can also sustain future generations.
Smotrna je tudi v ekološkem in gospodarskem smislu.
It also makes ecological and economic sense.
Zato je varstvo biotske raznovrstnosti tudi iz gospodarskega vidika v našem interesu.
Therefore, also from an economic perspective, protecting biodiversity is in our self-interest.