natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija je mnenja, da bi morala imeti možnost, da sprejme odločitev o vnovični preučitvi zgornje meje, potem ko prejme mnenji Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora o nujni potrebi za tako preučitev ter o novi zgornji meji, ki bi jo bilo treba uvesti.
The Commission finds that it should be have the possibility to decide a revision of the ceiling, after having received the opinion of the Economic and Financial Committee (EFC) on both the urgent need to do it and the new ceiling to introduce.
Poročevalec meni, da je zgornjo mejo smiselno povišati na 25 milijard EUR.
Your rapporteur considers that it is reasonable to raise the ceiling to 25 billion.
Ni pa potrebe po oblikovanju posebnega postopka, ki bi Komisiji omogočal vnovični pregled zgornje meje zunaj običajnih postopkov za sprejemanje odločitev.
However, there does not seem to be any need to establish a specific procedure for allowing the Commission to revise the ceiling outside the normal decision making procedures.
Kljub temu pa je morda ustrezno potrditi, da se želijo institucije hitro odzvati, kadar obstaja potreba po tem.
Nevertheless, it might be appropriate to confirm that the institutions are willing to act fast when necessary.
Mehanizem za zagotavljanje finančne podpore plačilnim bilancam držav članic
A facility providing financial assistance for Member States’ balances of payments
s priporočili Komisiji o evropskih javnih listinah
with recommendations to the Commission on the European Authentic Act
(Pobuda - člen 39 Poslovnika)
(Initiative – Rule 39 of the Rules of Procedure)
PRILOGA K PREDLOGU RESOLUCIJE: PODROBNA PRIPOROČILA O VSEBINI ZAHTEVANEGA PREDLOGA 7
ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION: DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED 7
– ob upoštevanju primerjalne študije o javnih listinah, ki jo je opravil Odbor za pravne zadeve,
– having regard the comparative study on authentic instruments conducted for the Committee on Legal Affairs,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0451/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0451/2008 ),
A. ker je v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu o haaškem programu Komisija kot eno prednostnih nalog navedla, da je treba zajamčiti resnični evropski prostor za civilno pravosodje, še zlasti kar zadeva priznavanje in izvrševanje sodnih odločb; ker je s ciljem večjega vzajemnega zaupanja v Evropski uniji program kot osrednjo prednostno nalogo za prihajajoča leta opredelil nadaljnje izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja kot konkretne oblike varstva pravic državljanov in načina za njihovo uporabo tudi v drugih državah članicah,
A. whereas in its aforesaid Communication on the Hague Programme, the Commission singled out, as one of its priorities, the need to guarantee an effective European area of civil justice, not least as regards the recognition and enforcement of judicial decisions; whereas, with the aim of strengthening mutual trust within the European Union, this programme stated that continued implementation of the principle of mutual recognition was a main priority in the coming years, as mutual recognition is a specific means of protecting the rights of citizens and guaranteeing their application across borders in Europe,
B. ker haaški program predvideva, da je nadaljnje izvajanje programa vzajemnega priznavanja osrednja prednostna naloga in da je program treba dokončno izvesti do leta 2011,
B. whereas the Hague Programme lays down that continued implementation of the programme of mutual recognition is a main priority and that this should be completed by 2011,
C. ker je pretok državljanov po Evropski uniji vedno večji; ker zaradi tega prihaja do pravnih položajev, ki zadevajo dve državi članici ali več,
C. whereas there is a steady increase in the movement of citizens within the European Union; whereas there is therefore a development in the number of legal situations concerning two or more Member States,
D. ker je Komisija v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu o haaškem programu priznala, da je v civilnem pravosodju temeljnega pomena, da se vzpostavi priznavanje javnih dokumentov; ker je zaradi tega absolutno treba dati prednost priznavanju in izvrševanju javnih listin, kot so opredeljene v sodbi Unibank
D. whereas, in its aforesaid Communication on the Hague Programme, the Commission recognised that in the field of civil justice one key aspect that needs to be addressed is the recognition of public documents; whereas, in this respect, there is an urgent need to promote the recognition and enforcement of authentic acts, as defined in the Unibank judgment
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. junija 1999 v zadevi C–260/97, Zbirka 1999, str.
Judgment of the Court of 17 June 1999 in Case C-260/97, ECR 1999, p.
E. ker sektorski in neusklajeni pristop k skupni zakonodaji na tem področju ni zadovoljiv
E. whereas the sectoral and inconsistent approach by Community legislation in this field is not satisfactory
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 Sveta (UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
1); Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 Sveta (UL L 338, 23.12.2003, str.
1); Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p.
1); Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 805/2004 Sveta (UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str.
1); Council Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 (OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
F. ker je treba evropske državljane zaščititi pri njihovih družinskih in dednih čezmejnih odnosih,
F. whereas there is a need to protect European citizens in their cross-border family and property relationships,
G. ker imajo podjetja vse več ustanov v tujini in se njihova dejavnost odvija znotraj Skupnosti, zaradi česar javne listine o njihovi ustanovitvi in delovanju krožijo vse pogosteje,
G. whereas businesses have more and more branches abroad and intra-Community activities that result in the greater movement of authentic acts relating to the setting up and operation of businesses,
H. ker je temeljnega pomena, da se v Uniji vzpostavi jasen in celovit pravni okvir, ki bo državljanom in gospodarskim subjektom jamčil varen in predvidljiv pravni položaj ter postopke, ki jih izvajajo pooblaščenci javnih organov,
H. whereas it is essential to establish a clear and comprehensive legal framework for the Union that guarantees citizens and economic operators the certainty and predictability of legal situations and transactions drawn up by those delegated with public authority,
I. ker je oblikovanje učinkovitega evropskega pravosodnega prostora v sodnih postopkih odvisno od čezmejnega priznavanja sodnih odločitev določenega sodišča ali upravnega organa, v izvensodnih postopkih pa od čezmejnega priznavanja javnih listin, ki jih je overil sodni organ ali javni uslužbenec oziroma oseba javnega zaupanja, imenovana z nalogo overjanja listin,
I. whereas the creation of a genuine European legal area is based, in the field of litigation, on the cross-border recognition of legal decisions made by a court or administrative authority and, in non judicial matters, on the cross-border recognition of authentic acts drawn up or registered by a judicial authority or by public officials appointed to authenticate legal acts,
J. ker se za javne listine, ki jih izdajo javni organi, uporabljajo uredbe s področja vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločitev,
J. whereas the existing regulations on the mutual recognition of legal decisions apply to authentic acts when these emanate from the public authorities,
K. ker je bistvena značilnost javne listine njena večja dokazna moč v primerjavi z zasebno listino in ker ta njena dokazna moč, ki je za sodnika prvenstvena, v zakonodaji držav članic normalno izvira iz zaupanja, ki ga uživajo listine, ki jih v okviru pravnih poslov v ta namen sestavijo pooblaščeni javni uslužbenci, osebe javnega zaupanja ali javni organi
K. whereas the key characteristic of the authentic act is that it has a greater probative value than a private agreement and that this probative value, which must be accepted by the judge, is regularly conferred on it in Member State legislation on account of the trust placed in acts drawn up, in the context of legal transactions, by a public officer appointed for this purpose or by a public authority
Ugotovitve generalnega pravobranilca La Pergole z dne 2. februarja 1999 v zadevi Unibank, točka 7. ,
Conclusion of Advocate-General La Pergola of 2 February 1999 in the aforementioned Unibank Case, point 7. ,
L. ker je osnovni pogoj za dokazno moč javne listine priznavanje njene verodostojnosti in ker jo je v tem smislu izdal javni uslužbenec ali oseba javnega zaupanja, pooblaščena za overjanje listin, ali drug javni organ; ker vzajemno zaupanje v pravosodju držav članic upravičuje, da se postopki preverjanja pristnosti listine v prihodnje uporabljajo samo ob resnem dvomu glede njene verodostojnosti,
L. whereas the prerequisite for the probative value of an authentic act is recognition of its authenticity, in that it emanates from a public official vested with the power to draw up authentic acts or from a public authority; whereas mutual trust in the legal systems of the Member States justifies making authenticity verification procedures only applicable in future when serious doubts arise as to the veracity of the document,
M. ker upoštevanje zakonodaje države članice, na čigar ozemlju se mora listina predložiti z namenom njene uporabe, vseeno predpostavlja gotovost, da priznavanje dokazne moči ne pomeni, da tuja javna listina zaradi priznavanja v državi članici, v kateri se mora predložiti, uživa večjo dokazno moč kot javne listine v tej državi članici; ker bi materialno področje uporabe zahtevane uredbe moralo zajemati bistveni del civilnega in gospodarskega prava, z izjemo nekaterih natančno opredeljenih zadev,
M. whereas respect for the legislation of the Member State upon whose territory the act is to be produced for use nevertheless entails the certainty that recognition of the probative value does not mean that the foreign authentic act enjoys a greater probative value than national authentic acts in that Member State by virtue of its recognition in the Member State in which it is to be produced; whereas the material scope of the Regulation requested should cover an essential part of civil and commercial law, with the exception of certain clearly defined matters,
N. ker razlike v strukturi in organizaciji sistemov javnih registrov s področja lastnine nepremičnin, pa tudi razlike v značaju in stopnji javnega zaupanja vanje, narekujejo izključitev prenosa stvarnih nepremičninskih pravic iz prihodnjega instrumenta Skupnosti, in sicer zaradi precejšnje soodvisnosti med načinom izdajanja javnih listin na eni strani in vpisa v javni register na drugi;
N. whereas differences in the structure and organisation of public registry systems in the field of property ownership, as well as differences concerning the nature and scale of the public confidence placed in them, mean that the transfer of immovable property rights has to be excluded from a future Community instrument, given the close correlation between the method of drawing up an authentic act and entry into the public register,
O. ker za priznavanje sodnih odločb po Evropski uniji takšna izključitev pomeni, da so za pritožbe v zvezi s stvarnimi nepremičninskimi pravicami izključno pristojna sodišča, na območju katerih leži nepremičnina, za pritožbe v zvezi z veljavnostjo vpisa v javni register pa sodišča, na ozemlju katerih se javni register vodi
O. whereas, as regards the recognition of legal decisions across the Union, this exclusion corresponds to attributing exclusive competence to the courts where the property is situated for all appeals relating to immovable property rights and to the courts on the territory where the public register is kept for all appeals relating to the validity of entries in the public register
2. poziva Komisijo, naj mu na osnovi člena 65, točke (a), in člena 67, odstavka 5, druge alineje, pogodbe o ES predloži zakonodajni predlog o vzpostavitvi vzajemnega priznavanja in izvrševanja javnih listin;
Requests the Commission to submit to Parliament, on the basis of Article 65(a) and the second indent of Article 67(5) of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on establishing the mutual recognition and enforcement of authentic acts;
5. poudarja, da se zahtevana uredba ne sme uporabljati za vprašanja v zvezi s predpisi, ki se uporabljajo za vsebino javne listine, niti za vprašanja v zvezi s pristojnostjo, organiziranostjo in strukturo organov, javnih uslužbencev ali oseb javnega zaupanja, vključno s postopkom overjanja;
Specifies that the Regulation requested should not apply either to matters relating to the law applicable to the subject of the authentic act or to questions relating to the competence, organisation and structure of public authorities and officials, including the authentication procedure;
Vzajemno zaupanje v pravosodju znotraj Skupnosti upravičuje, da se v prihodnje odpravijo postopki, vezani na preverjanje verodostojnosti javnih listin v čezmejnih zadevah.
Mutual trust in the field of law within the Community justifies the future abolition of procedures for checking the accuracy of authentic acts in cross-border matters.
Priznavanje javne listine za namene njene uporabe v zaprošeni državi članici se lahko zavrne samo v primeru resnega in utemeljenega dvoma glede njene verodostojnosti ali če je priznavanje v nasprotju z javnim redom zaprošene države članice.
This recognition of an authentic act for the purpose of its use in the requested Member State can only be refused in the case of serious and substantiated doubts as to its authenticity, or if recognition is contrary to public policy in the Member State requested.
Parlament poziva Komisijo, naj mu na osnovi člena 65, točke (a), in člena 67, odstavka 5, druga alineje, pogodbe o ES predloži zakonodajni predlog o vzpostavitvi vzajemnega priznavanja in izvrševanja javnih listin.
Parliament requests the Commission to submit to it, on the basis of Article 65(a) and the second indent of Article 67(5) of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on establishing the mutual recognition and enforcement of authentic acts.
4 Akt iz tega zakonodajnega predloga se mora uporabljati za vse javne listine v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, razen tistih, ki se nanašajo na nepremičnine in morajo biti ali so lahko predmet vpisa ali zaznamka v javni register.
4 The act that is the subject of the legislative proposal should apply to all authentic acts on civil and commercial matters except those that relate to property and should or may be subject to entry or mention in a public register.
Ne sme uporabljati za vprašanja v zvezi s predpisi, ki se uporabljajo za vsebino javne listine, in ne za vprašanja v zvezi s pristojnostjo, organiziranostjo in strukturo organov, javnih uslužbencev ali oseb javnega zaupanja, vključno s postopkom overjanja.
It should not apply either to matters relating to the law applicable to the subject of the authentic act or to questions relating to the competence, organisation and structure of public authorities and officials, including the authentication procedure.
Evropa se širi, Evropejce pa se spodbuja k vse večji mobilnosti v prostoru, katerega meje se nenehno širijo.
Europe is growing and Europeans are required to be more and more mobile within this area whose borders are constantly expanding.
Vendar pa je gibanje državljanov po Evropi ovirano zaradi preprek v zvezi z javnimi listinami.
The movement of citizens within the European Union is, however, impeded by problems with the movement of authentic acts.
Javne listine obstajajo v večini držav članic.
The concept of the authentic act exists in most Member States.
Države na evropski celini, ki poznajo sistem civilnega prava, izhajajo iz sistema dveh stebrov.
Member States on the European continent with a civil law jurisdiction have a two-pillar system.
V nasprotju z državami z anglosaškim in skandinavskim pravom v zvezi s sodnimi odločitvami ne ukrepajo le ex post (postopki za reševanje sporov), temveč pravne akte, ki nosijo precejšnje osebne ali premoženjske posledice, podvržejo obvezni preventivni kontroli njihove zakonitosti prek overjanja pravnih aktov, ki ga opravi javni uslužbenec, oseba javnega zaupanja ali javni organ (preventivni sodni ukrepi; pristojnost sodišča, da z namenom preprečevanja sporov preveri določene pravne akte).
In contrast to countries with Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian laws, the State is not just involved ex post as regards judicial decisions (" the administration of contentious justice "), but submits legal acts with major consequences in terms of personal or property rights to mandatory preventive scrutiny of their legality through authentication of the legal act by a public official or public authority (" administration of preventive justice " ; " voluntary jurisdiction ").
Postopki preverjanja torej potekajo samostojno ob postopkih za reševanje sporov.
The administration of pr e ventive justice is thus separate from contentious justice .
Javne listine so namenjene preprečevanju kasnejših sporov glede temeljnega pravnega akta ter v primeru sodnega postopka sodniku olajšujejo odločitev, saj imajo zavezujočo dokazno moč.
The authentic act is intended to avert future litigation relating to the basic legal act whilst making it easier for the judge to take decisions in the case of legal proceedings by virtue of the binding probative value attached to the authentic act.
Danes so se v zvezi s priznavanjem javnih listin, ki prihajajo iz drugih držav članic, vzpostavile zelo različne razmere.
To date, the recognition of authentic acts from other Member States has been handled in very diverse ways across the Union.
Državljan z javno listino, ki jo želi imeti priznano v drugi državi, kot tisti, ki jo je izdala, je lahko soočen z različnim: z obveznostjo potrditve, ki jo narekuje haaška konvencija z dne 5. oktobra 1961, ali z oprostitvijo potrditve v skladu z dvostranskimi sporazumi.
A citizen in possession of an authentic act which he wants recognised in a Member State other than the one which issued it, may face various options: an apostille under the Hague Convention of 5 October 1961 or dispensation from an apostille under bilateral agreements.
Kar zadeva dokazno moč in izvrševanje javne listine v drugi državi kot je država prejemnica, v nekaterih državah tuj akt ni izvršljiv, razen če ga nacionalno sodišče razglasi za izvršljivega, potem ko preveri pristojnosti tujega organa, pravo, ki se uporablja, ter postopkovno in vsebinsko skladnost odločbe z mednarodnim javnim redom.
With respect to the probative value and enforcement of the authentic act in a Member State other than the recipient Member State, a foreign act is only enforced in some Member States if it has been declared enforceable by a national court after the latter has verified the competence of the foreign authority, the law applied and the conformity of the decision with substantive and procedural international public policy.
Res je, da obstaja določeno število instrumentov Skupnosti (Bruselj I, Bruselj IIa, uredba o evropskem nalogu za izvršbo), nekaj pa se jih trenutno oblikuje (preživninske obveznosti, dedovanje in premoženjske pravice), vendar ta sektorski pristop ne zadostuje.
Whilst a certain number of Community instruments do exist (Brussels I, Brussels IIa, the Regulation on the European Enforcement Order) or are being drawn up (the work on maintenance obligations or on succession and matrimonial arrangements), this is a rather unsatisfactory sectoral approach.
Poleg tega postopki, ki so bili doslej uvedeni z uredbami Skupnosti, niso enaki.
Furthermore, the procedures introduced to date by Community regulations are not identical.
Takšno pomanjkanje skladnosti je v škodo evropskih državljanov in podjetij, saj je težko z gotovostjo določiti, iz katere vrste postopka javna listina izhaja, in posledično ugotoviti, katera sredstva je treba uporabiti za njeno izvršitev v tujini.
This lack of harmonisation is damaging for European citizens and businesses as it is difficult to determine with any certainty which procedure applies and thus to know what needs to be done for the authentic act to be enforceable abroad.
Zaradi pomanjkanja homogenosti je pretok javnih listin danes težaven in omejen, tako kar zadeva njihovo število kot vrsto.
The de facto result of this lack of uniformity is that the movement of authentic acts is currently difficult and limited, both in number and in type of act.
Državljani in akterji v gospodarstvu pričakujejo izboljšanje njihovega pretoka kot zagotovilo za povečano varnost transakcij.
Citizens and economic operators are therefore hoping that the better movement of authentic acts will guarantee that their transactions are more secure.
Od reforme se pričakuje troje koristi: prihranek časa, nižje stroške in poenostavitev postopkov.
The benefits expected from the reform would be threefold: time savings, lower costs, and simplified procedures.
Uvedba vzajemnega priznavanja in izvrševanje javnih listin
The introduction of mutual recognition and the enforcement of authentic acts
Z vzpostavitvijo skupnega režima vzajemnega priznavanja in ustreznim izvrševanjem javnih listin, ki bi bile skupne vsem državam članicam, bi premostili nacionalne okvire ter državljanom in podjetjem olajšali vsakdanjik, in sicer še zlasti z ukinitvijo pravnih formalnosti, z odpravo potrditve ter s poenostavitvijo postopka izvršitve.
The introduction of a common system for the mutual recognition and enforcement of authentic acts that applies to all Member States will help transcend the national dimension and make life easier for citizens and businesses, mainly by dispensing with the formalities on legalisation and apostilles and simplifying the exequatur procedure.
Javne listine se v pravu Skupnosti pojavljajo v poročilu Jenard-Möller o luganski konvenciji
The authentic act was defined by Community law in the Jenard-Möller Report on the Lugano Convention
UL C 189, 28.7.1992, str.
OJ C 189, 28 July 1992, p.
57, točka 72. , to opredelitev pa je potrdilo sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v sodbi Unibank
57, point 72. , a definition confirmed by the ECJ's Unibank judgment
Iz omenjenih besedil izhaja, da so javne listine akti, katerih verodostojnost mora na prvem mestu potrditi sodni organ, javni uslužbenec ali oseba javnega zaupanja, kor drugo pa je treba preveriti ne le pristnost podpisov, temveč tudi verodostojnost vsebine.
These texts state that the authentic act is an instrument whose authenticity should have been established by a public authority or by public officials and which should relate to the content of the instrument and not only the signature.
Izvršljive javne listine morajo sicer biti v državi, v kateri so bile izdane, neposredno izvršljive.
It also has to be enforceable in itself in the State in which it originates.
Ob vzajemnem zaupanju znotraj Skupnosti bi bilo upravičeno, da se v prihodnje ukinejo postopki, vezani na preverjanje verodostojnosti javnih listin pri čezmejnih zadevah.
Mutual trust within the Community justifies the future abolition of procedures for checking the accuracy of the authentic act in cross-border matters.
Ta ukinitev pa ne sme veljati za listine, ki se nanašajo na nepremičnine, in sicer tako zaradi pravila locus regit actum, kot tudi zaradi postopkovnih pravil, ki urejajo vpise v zemljiško knjigo.
This abolition cannot extend to acts relating to property, because of the ' locus regit actum ' rule and procedural rules governing entries in public land registers.
Razlike v strukturi in organizaciji sistemov javnih registrov s področja nepremičninskega premoženja, pa tudi razlike v značaju in stopnji javnega zaupanja vanje, narekujejo izključitev nepremičninskega prava iz prihodnjega instrumenta Skupnosti, in sicer zaradi precejšnje soodvisnosti med načinom overjanja listin na eni strani in vpisa v javni register na drugi.
Differences in the structure and organisation of public registry systems in the field of property ownership, as well as differences concerning the nature and scale of the public confidence placed in them, mean that the field of property law has to be excluded from a future Community instrument, given the close correlation between the method of drawing up an authentic act and entry into the public register.