natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pomanjkanje rezervnih delov ne more biti veljavna podlaga, da se upraviči trgovčeva nezmožnost odpraviti neskladnosti v razumnem času ali brez nesorazmernega truda.
The lack of spare parts should not be a valid ground to justify the trader's failure to remedy the lack of conformity within a reasonable time or without a disproportionate effort.
(40) Potrošnik mora najprej imeti možnost, da od trgovca zahteva popravilo ali zamenjavo blaga, razen če bi bila ta sredstva nemogoča ali nesorazmerna.
(40) The consumer should in the first instance have the option of requiring the trader to repair the goods or to replace them unless those remedies are impossible or disproportionate.
Treba je objektivno določiti, ali je sredstvo nesorazmerno.
Whether or not a remedy is disproportionate should be determined objectively.
(41) Potrošnik ne sme imeti nobenih stroškov za odpravo neskladnosti, zlasti stroškov poštnine, dela in materialov.
(41) The consumer should not bear any costs for remedying the lack of conformity, particularly the cost of postage, labour and materials.
Poleg tega potrošnik trgovcu ne sme plačati nadomestila za uporabo blaga z napako.
Furthermore, the consumer should not compensate the trader for the use of the defective goods.
Potrošnik bi moral imeti pravico, da v skladu z določbami veljavnega nacionalnega prava zahteva odškodnino za kakršno koli neizpolnjevanje prodajne pogodbe, ki ga trgovec ne odpravi.
The consumer should be entitled to claim damages, in accordance with provisions of applicable national law, for any loss resulting from lack of conformity with the sales contract and not remedied by the trader.
Treba je omogočiti, da taka odškodnina vključuje nedenarno izgubo, če tako določa veljavno nacionalno pravo.
It should be possible for such damages to include non-pecuniary damages where applicable national law so provides .
(42) Ko trgovec odkloni odpravo neskladnosti ali več kot enkrat ne odpravi neskladnosti, mora imeti potrošnik pravico do svobodne izbire katerega koli razpoložljivega pravnega sredstva.
(42) When the trader has either refused or has more than once failed to remedy the lack of conformity the consumer should be entitled to choose freely any of the available remedies.
Trgovčeva zavrnitev zahteve je lahko eksplicitna ali implicitna , kar v slednjem primeru pomeni , da se trgovec ne odziva na zahteve potrošnika, naj neskladnost odpravi, ali pa te zahteve ignorira .
The trader's refusal can be either explicit or implicit, meaning in the latter case that the trader does not respond or ignores the consumer's request to remedy the lack of conformity.
(42) Potrošnik bi moral imeti pravico do svobodne izbire katerega koli razpoložljivega pravnega sredstva , če nima pravice do popravila ali zamenjave .
(42) The consumer should be entitled to choose freely any of the available remedies if he is not entitled to have the goods repaired or replaced .
Da bi zagotovile višjo raven varstva potrošnikov , bi morale imeti države članice možnost , da sprejmejo ali ohranijo nacionalne pravne predpise o svobodni izbiri pravnih sredstev pri neskladnosti .
It should be possible for Member States to adopt or maintain provisions of national law on the free choice of remedies in the event of lack of conformity , in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection.
(42a) Opredeliti je treba, da je lahko trgovec v nekaterih primerih odgovoren za neskladnost, ki obstaja že ob prenosu tveganja na potrošnika, čeprav postane očitna šele kasneje.
(42a) It should be stipulated that in certain cases the trader may be held liable for a lack of conformity that existed at the time the risk was transferred to the consumer, even if the lack of conformity becomes apparent only subsequently.
Uvodna izjava 42 b (novo)
Recital 42 b (new)
(42b) Če je trgovec kot končni prodajalec odgovoren potrošniku zaradi ravnanja ali opustitve dejanja proizvajalca, je treba določiti, da lahko trgovec kot končni prodajalec uveljavlja regresno pravico do odgovornega ali odgovornih v pogodbeni verigi.
(42 b ) Where the trader, as final seller, is liable to the consumer because of an act or omission by the producer, it should be ensured that the trader, as final seller, can pursue remedies against the person or persons liable in the contractual chain.
V ta namen morajo nacionalni predpisi držav članic opredeliti odgovorne osebe ter postopke in dejanja.
To this end, Member States' national provisions should determine the person or persons liable, together with the relevant actions and procedure.
Uvodna izjava 42 c (novo)
Recital 42 c (new)
(42c) Potrošniku mora za pogodbene nepravilnosti pripadati obdobje odgovornosti dveh let.
(42c) With regard to lack of conformity, the consumer should be entitled to a two-year liability period.
V njegovo korist je treba ovrgljivo domnevati, da so nepravilnosti, ki so nastopile v šestih mesecih po prenosu tveganja, obstajale že ob trenutku prenosa tveganja.
There should be a rebuttable presumption in the consumer's favour that any lack of conformity which has become apparent within six months after the risk passed to the consumer already existed when the risk passed.
Da bi zagotovile višjo raven varstva potrošnikov, morajo imeti države članice možnost, da sprejmejo ali ohranijo nacionalne pravne predpise o obdobju odgovornosti, trajanju obrnitve dokaznega bremena ali posebnih pravilih za resnejše neskladnosti, ki se pojavijo po preteku obdobja odgovornosti.
It should be possible for Member States to adopt or maintain provisions of national law on liability periods, duration for reversal of the burden of proof or specific rules on significant lack of conformity which becomes apparent after the liability period, in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection.
(43) Direktiva 1999/44/ES je državam članicam omogočila določitev obdobja najmanj dveh mesecev, v katerem je moral potrošnik obvestiti trgovca o morebitni neskladnosti.
(43) Directive 1999/44/EC allowed the Member States to set a period of at least two months during which the consumer was to inform the trader of any lack of conformity.
Različna zakonodaja o prenosu je ustvarila ovire za trgovanje.
The diverging transposition laws have created barriers to trade.
Zato je treba to zakonodajno možnost odstraniti in izboljšati pravno varnost tako, da se potrošnikom naloži obveznost, da trgovca obvestijo o neskladnosti v dveh mesecih od datuma ugotovitve neskladnosti.
Therefore, it is necessary to remove this regulatory option and improve legal certainty by obliging consumers to inform the trader of the lack of conformity within two months from the date of detection.
(44) Nekateri trgovci ali proizvajalci potrošnikom ponujajo tržne garancije.
(44) Some traders or producers offer consumers commercial guarantees.
Za zagotovitev, da se potrošniki ne zavajajo, morajo tržne garancije vsebovati nekatere informacije, vključno s trajanjem, področjem ozemeljske uporabe in izjavo, da tržna garancija ne vpliva na zakonske pravice potrošnika.
In order to ensure that consumers are not misled, the commercial guarantees should include certain information, including their duration, territorial scope and a statement that the commercial guarantee does not affect the consumer's legal rights.
Za zagotovitev, da se potrošniki ne zavajajo, morajo tržne garancije vsebovati nekatere informacije, vključno s trajanjem, področjem ozemeljske uporabe in izjavo, da tržna garancija ne vpliva na zakonske pravice potrošnika v skladu z veljavnimi nacionalnimi določbami in določbami iz te direktive .
In order to ensure that consumers are not misled, the commercial guarantees should include certain information, including their duration, territorial scope and a statement that the commercial guarantee does not affect the consumer's legal rights under the national provisions in force and those laid down in this Directive .
(45a) Usklajeni zakonodajni vidiki zadevajo le pogodbe med podjetji in potrošniki.
(45a) The harmonised regulatory aspects concern only contracts concluded between businesses and consumers.
Določbe o nepoštenih pogodbenih pogojih zato ne bi smele vplivati na nacionalno zakonodajo na področju pogodb o zaposlitvi, pogodb o dednih pravicah, pogodb na področju družinskega prava ter pogodb o ustanovitvi in organizaciji podjetij ali sporazumih o partnerstvu in pogodbenih pogojih.
Therefore, the provisions on unfair contract terms should not affect national law in the area of contracts relating to employment, contracts relating to succession rights, contracts relating to family law and contracts relating to the incorporation and organisation of companies or partnership agreements and bond terms.
(46) Določbe o nepoštenih pogodbenih pogojih se ne smejo uporabljati za pogodbene pogoje, ki neposredno ali posredno odražajo obvezne zakonske ali regulativne določbe držav članic, ki so v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti .
(46) Provisions on unfair contract terms should not apply to contract terms, which directly or indirectly reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions of the Member States which comply with Community law.
Za Pogoje, ki izražajo načela ali določbe mednarodnih konvencij, katerih podpisnica je Skupnost ali država članica, zlasti na področju prevoza, prav tako ni treba opraviti preskusa nepoštenosti.
Similarly terms which reflect the principles or provisions of international conventions to which the Community or the Member States are party, particularly in the transport area, should not be subject to the unfairness test.
(46) Določbe o nepoštenih pogodbenih pogojih se ne smejo uporabljati za pogodbene pogoje, ki neposredno ali posredno odražajo zakonske ali regulativne določbe ali določbe o javnem redu držav članic, ki so v skladu z zakonodajo Unije .
(46) Provisions on unfair contract terms should not apply to contract terms, which directly or indirectly reflect statutory , regulatory or public policy provisions of the Member States which comply with Union law.
Podobno naj bi pogodbeni pogoji odražali načela in določbe Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Similarly , contract terms should reflect the principles and provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Za pogoje, ki izražajo načela ali določbe mednarodnih konvencij, katerih podpisnica je Unija ali država članica, zlasti na področju prevoza, prav tako ni treba opraviti preskusa nepoštenosti.
Terms which reflect the principles or provisions of international conventions to which the Union or the Member States are party, particularly in the transport area, should not be subject to the unfairness test.
(47) Potrošniške pogodbe morajo biti čitljive ter napisane v preprostem in razumljivem jeziku.
(47) Consumer contracts should be drafted in plain, intelligible language and be legible .
Trgovci morajo imeti možnost, da prosto izbirajo vrsto ali velikost pisave, v kateri so napisani pogodbeni pogoji.
Traders should be free to choose the font type or size in which the contract terms are drafted.
Pred sklenitvijo pogodbe mora biti potrošniku dana možnost, da pogoje prebere.
The consumer should be given an opportunity to read the terms before concluding the contract.
To možnost je treba potrošniku zagotoviti tako, da se mu pogoji predložijo na zahtevo (za pogodbe, sklenjene v poslovnih prostorih) ali se mu dajo na voljo kako drugače (na primer na spletni strani trgovca za pogodbe na daljavo), ali pa se standardni pogoji priložijo naročilnici (za pogodbe, sklenjene zunaj poslovnih prostorov).
This opportunity could be given to the consumer by providing him with the terms on request (for on-premises contracts) or making those terms otherwise available (e.g. on the trader's website in respect of distance contracts) or attaching standard terms to the order form (in respect of off-premises contracts).
Trgovec mora od potrošnika pridobiti izrecno soglasje za kakršno koli plačilo poleg plačila za glavno pogodbeno obveznost trgovca.
The trader should seek the consumer's express consent to any payment in addition to the remuneration for the trader's main contractual obligation.
Pridobivanje privolitve z uporabo zavrnilnih sistemov, kot so vnaprej izbrana polja na spletu, je treba prepovedati.
Inferring consent by using opt-out systems, such as pre-ticked boxes online should be prohibited.
(47) Vsi pogodbeni pogoji bi morali biti izraženi na jasen in razumljiv način.
(47) All contract terms should be expressed in a clear and comprehensible manner.
Če je pogodbeni pogoj zapisan, bi moral biti vedno napisan v preprostem in razumljivem jeziku.
If a contract term is in writing, it should always be drafted in plain, intelligible language.
(47a) Trgovci bi morali imeti prosto izbiro glede načina obveščanja o pogodbenih pogojih, na primer o vrsti in velikosti črk, s katerimi so napisani pogodbeni pogoji.
(47a) Traders should be free to choose the way in which contract terms are communicated, for example the font type or size in which the contract terms are drafted.
Države članice se morajo vzdržati vseh predstavitvenih zahtev, razen zahtev, povezanih z invalidi, ali kadar lahko blago ali storitve pomenijo posebno tveganje za zdravje in varnost potrošnika ali tretje osebe.
Member States should refrain from imposing any presentational requirements, except for those related to persons with disabilities or where the goods or services may present a particular risk to the health and safety of the consumer or a third person.
Države članice lahko tudi naložijo dodatne zahteve, kadar zaradi zapletenosti pogodb za to blago ali storitve obstaja tveganje, da bi utegnil biti potrošnik oškodovan – to zajema tudi vprašanja glede konkurence v zadevnem sektorju.
Member States may also seek to impose additional requirements where due to complexities inherent in contracts for those goods or services, there is a risk of consumer detriment including issues arising which relate to competition in that sector.
To se lahko nanaša na primer na pogodbe v zvezi s finančnimi storitvami, plinom, elektriko in vodo, telekomunikacijami ter nepremičninami.
This may apply, for example, to contracts relating to financial services, gas, electricity and water, telecoms and immovable property .
Vendar to ne velja za oblikovne nacionalne zahteve v zvezi s sklenitvijo pogodbe ali druge oblikovne zahteve, kot je na primer jezik, v katerem so pogoji napisani, zahteve v zvezi z vsebino pogojev ali formulacijo nekaterih pogodbenih pogojev za specifične sektorje.
However, this should not apply to formal national requirements concerning the conclusion of the contract or other formal requirements such as for instance the language of the terms, requirements on the content of the terms or the formulation of certain contract terms for specific sectors.
Ta direktiva naj ne usklajuje jezikovnih zahtev, ki veljajo za potrošniške pogodbe.
This Directive should not harmonise language requirements applicable to consumer contracts.
Zato bi morale države članice ohraniti ali uvesti v svoje nacionalne zakonodaje pravne zahteve v zvezi z jezikom, v katerem so napisani pogodbeni pogoji.
Therefore, Member States should be able to maintain or introduce in their national law linguistic requirements relating to the contractual terms.
(49) Za namene te direktive se ne sme ocenjevati niti pravičnosti pogojev, ki opisujejo glavni predmet pogodbe, niti razmerja med kakovostjo in ceno dobavljenega blaga ali izvedenih storitev, razen če ti pogoji ne izpolnjujejo zahtev po preglednosti.
(49) For the purposes of this Directive, neither the fairness of terms which describe the main subject matter of the contract, nor the quality/price ratio of the goods or services supplied should be assessed unless these terms did not meet transparency requirements.
Glavni predmet pogodbe in razmerje med kakovostjo in ceno pa je treba kljub temu upoštevati pri ocenjevanju pravičnosti drugih pogojev.
The main subject matter of the contract and the price/quality ratio should nevertheless be taken into account in assessing the fairness of other terms.
Na primer, v zavarovalniških pogodbah pogoji, ki jasno opredeljujejo ali opisujejo zavarovano tveganje in obveznost zavarovalnice, ne smejo biti predmet take ocene, če se te omejitve upoštevajo pri izračunu premije, ki jo plača potrošnik.
For example, in insurance contracts, the terms which clearly define or circumscribe the insured risk and the insurer's liability should not be subject to such an assessment since these restrictions are taken into account in calculating the premium paid by the consumer.
Ta izključitev ne velja za plačilo, predvideno za trgovca pri pomožnih ali kontingentnih stroških, določenih v pogodbi, vključno s provizijami ali stroški za kršitev katerega koli pogodbenega pogoja, ki bi morala biti v celoti predmet preskusa poštenosti.
This exclusion does not apply to the remuneration foreseen for the trader from ancillary or contingent charges set out in the contract, including fees or charges for breaching any of the terms of the contract, which should be fully subject to the fairness test.
(50) Direktiva za zagotovitev pravne varnosti in izboljšanja delovanja notranjega trga mora vsebovati dva seznama nepoštenih pogojev.
(50) In order to ensure legal certainty and improve the functioning of the internal market, the Directive should contain two lists of unfair terms.
Priloga II vsebuje seznam pogojev, ki morajo v vseh okoliščinah veljati za nepoštene.
Annex II contains a list of terms which should in all circumstances be considered unfair.
Priloga III vsebuje seznam pogojev, ki morajo veljati za nepoštene, razen če trgovec dokaže nasprotno.
Annex III contains a list of terms which should be deemed unfair unless the trader proves otherwise.
Ta seznama se morata uporabljati v vseh državah članicah.
These same lists should apply in all Member States.
(50) Direktiva za zagotovitev pravne varnosti in izboljšanja delovanja notranjega trga mora vsebovati dva neizčrpna seznama nepoštenih pogojev.
(50) In order to ensure legal certainty and improve the functioning of the internal market, the Directive should contain two non-exhaustive lists of unfair terms.
(51) Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje te direktive, je treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil.
(51) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission.
(52) Zlasti je treba Komisijo pooblastiti, da spremeni Prilogi II in III o pogodbenih pogojih, ki se obravnavajo kot nepošteni ali se zanje domneva, da so nepošteni.
(52) In particular, the Commission should be empowered to amend Annexes II and III on contract terms to be considered or presumed unfair.
(53) Pooblastila Komisije za spremembo prilog II in III je treba uporabljati za zagotavljanje doslednega izvajanja pravil o nepoštenih pogojih tako, da se ti prilogi dopolnita s pogodbenimi pogoji, ki veljajo za nepoštene v vseh okoliščinah ali ki veljajo za nepoštene, razen če trgovec dokaže drugače.
(53) The Commission's power to amend Annexes II and III should be used to ensure consistent implementation of the rules on unfair terms by supplementing those Annexes with contractual terms, which should be considered unfair in all circumstances or which should be deemed unfair unless the trader has proved otherwise.
Uvodna izjava 55 a (novo)
Recital 55 a (new)
(55a) Države članice morajo zagotoviti ustrezno stopnjo sodelovanja med njihovimi nacionalnimi organi in mrežo evropskih centrov za varstvo potrošnikov, da bi se lahko odzvali v čezmejnih primerih, posebej v nerešenih primerih evropskih centrov za varstvo potrošnikov.
(55a) The Member States should ensure that their national authorities have the necessary level of cooperation with the European Consumer Centre (ECC) network, so as to react in cross-border cases, especially on pending requests at ECCs.
(60) Evropska komisija bo preučila najprimernejši način za zagotovitev, da so vsi potrošniki seznanjeni s svojimi pravicami na prodajnem mestu.
(60) The European Commission will look into the most appropriate way to ensure that all consumers are made aware of their rights at the point of sale.
(60) Komisija bo po posvetovanju z državami članicami in zainteresiranimi stranmi preučila najprimernejši način za zagotovitev, da so vsi potrošniki in trgovci seznanjeni s svojimi pravicami na prodajnem mestu.
(60) The Commission , following consultation with the Member States and stakeholders, will look into the most appropriate way to ensure that all consumers and traders are made aware of their rights at the point of sale.
Komisija bi morala uporabiti zlasti načine, ki jih nudijo orodja informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije in javni mediji.
The Commission should avail itself especially of the means provided by information and communication technology tools and public media.
(61a) Da bi države članice zagotovile višjo raven varstva potrošnikov, je treba predvideti proces vzajemnega ocenjevanja, v okviru katerega morajo države članice v roku za prenos te direktive najprej pregledati svoje pravne predpise, da bi ugotovile, katere strožje predpise, ki so v skladu s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije, bodo sprejele ali ohranile v svojem pravnem sistemu.
(61a) Provision should be made for a mutual evaluation process in which, during the transposition period for this Directive, Member States would first have to screen their legislation in order to ascertain what stricter provisions, which are compliant with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, are to be maintained or adopted in their legal system in order to ensure a higher level of protection for the consumer.
Države članice morajo do konca obdobja prenosa te direktive pripraviti poročilo o rezultatih tega pregleda.
By the end of the transposition period for this Directive, Member States should draw up a report on the results of this screening.
Vsako poročilo je treba posredovati vsem ostalim državam članicam in zainteresiranim stranem.
Each report should be submitted to all other Member States and stakeholders.
Države članice bodo imele na voljo šest mesecev za predložitev pripomb v zvezi s temi poročili.
Member States would then have six months in which to submit their observations on these reports.
Komisija mora najkasneje eno leto po preteku roka za prenos te direktive in potem vsaka tri leta pripraviti splošno poročilo, ki po potrebi vsebuje zakonodajne predloge.
Not later than one year after the end of the transposition period for this Directive, and every three years thereafter, the Commission should draw up a summary report, accompanied where appropriate by legislative proposals.
Komisija mora po potrebi podpreti države članice pri pripravi skupne metodologije.
If necessary, the Commission could assist the Member States in devising a common method.
(61b) Da bi zagotovili visoko raven varstva potrošnikov v vseh državah članicah, je treba osebe in organizacije, ki imajo upravičen interes za varstvo potrošnikov, spodbujati, da države članice in Komisijo obveščajo o svojih ocenah in pripravljajo nezavezujoča priporočila, da bi jih lahko upoštevali pri pregledu te direktive.
(61b) To ensure a high level of consumer protection in all Member States, persons and organisations with a legitimate interest in consumer protection should be encouraged to notify the Member States and the Commission about their evaluations and issue non-binding recommendations so that they can be taken into account when this Directive is reviewed.
(63) Primerno je to direktivo pregledati, če se ugotovijo ovire za notranji trg.
(63) It is appropriate to review this Directive if some barriers to the internal market were identified.