natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Danes je sektor telekomunikacijskih storitev hitro rastoč visokotehnološki sektor z veliko stopnjo inovacij ter obsežnimi naložbami in produktivnostjo, njegova povprečna dobičkonosnost pa občutno presega nefinančno poslovno ekonomijo.
Today, the telecom services sector is a fast growing high-technology sector, with high innovation, considerable investments and productivity, and profitability has often averaged significantly above the non-financial business economy.
Zaradi tega je to odločilen del nefinančnega poslovnega sektorja, za katerega je Eurostat izračunal povprečno dodano vrednost 3,5 % za EU s 27 državami članicami leta 2005.
This makes it a crucial part of the non-financial business economy with Eurostat calculating an average of 3.5% of value added for the EU of 27 Member States in 2005.
Glede konkurenčnosti v primerjavi s konkurenti so naložbe v tem sektorju presegle naložbe Združenih držav in azijske pacifiške regije leta 2005.
In terms of competitiveness vis-à-vis its competitors, investment in this sector overtook that of the US and the Asia Pacific Region in 2005.
Tega leta je evropski trg z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi storitvami obsegal okoli 273 milijard EUR.
This same year, Europe's market for electronic communications services amounted to some 273 billion Euros.
Potrošniki so jasno občutili učinke tega dogajanja.
The effects have been clearly felt by the consumer.
Konkurenca med telekomunikacijskimi operaterji je v zadnjih 20 letih povzročila občutno znižanje stroškov za telefonske klice.
Competition amongst telecoms operators has drastically cut the cost of making phone calls over the past 20 years.
Med letoma 2000 in 2006 se je tehtano povprečje EU za stroške triminutnega klica znižalo za 65 %, za stroške desetminutnega pa za 74 %.
Between 2000 and 2006, the EU weighted average charge of a three minute call fell by 65% and the cost of a ten minute call fell by 74%.
Čeprav je bila liberalizacija doslej uspešna, je še vedno naša odgovornost, da kot zakonodajalci zagotovimo, da bomo našim podjetjem še naprej omogočali najboljše razmere, zlasti zato, ker želimo Evropo preoblikovati v gospodarstvo znanja in ker je telekomunikacijski sector pri doseganju tega cilja pomemben.
Whilst liberalisation has been a success story thus far, we still have the responsibility to ensure that we as policy makers continue to provide the best conditions for our companies, especially in light of our aspirations to transform Europe into a knowledge economy and the importance of the telecoms sector in meeting this objective.
Zato ne moremo počivati na lovorikah.
To this end, we cannot sit on our laurels.
Na poti k integriranemu trgu je še vedno nekaj ozkih grl.
There are still bottlenecks that remain in the way of our creation of an integrated market place.
Še vedno so vprašanja prehajanja meja in razlik med državami članicami glede širokopasovnega dostopa, digitalizacije in storitev.
There still exist cross-boarder issues and disparities between Member States as regards to broadband access, digitalisation and services.
Če želimo zagotoviti skupni trg, je ta vprašanja treba rešiti.
These need to be resolved if we are to guarantee a truly common market.
Predlog Komisije o ustanovitvi organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij: glavni problemi
The ECCMA Commission Proposal: Key Problems
V sedanjem pregledu okvira evropskih telekomunikacij je Komisija predlagala ustanovitev organa za trg evropskih elektronskih komunikacij (EECMA) ( KOM(2007)0699 ; 2007/0249(COD) .
In the current review of the framework for European telecommunications, the Commission has proposed the establishment of the European Electronic Communications Market Authority (EECMA) ( COM(2007)0699 ; 2007/0249(COD) ).
Poročevalka meni, da je predlog o ustanovitvi EECMA sicer dobronameren, vendar se pod površjem skriva nekaj hudih težav.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that the EECMA proposal, however well intended, under the surface reveals several difficulties.
Poleg tega je predlog tudi v nasprotju z načelom subsidiarnosti, saj državam članicam in nacionalnim regulativnim organom s tega področja jemlje pristojnosti.
Moreover, in so doing, it also counters the principles of subsidiarity, taking power away from Member States and NRAs who are on the field.
Ta organ bi bil nepotrebno oddaljen od trgov, ki naj bi jih urejal, saj bi deloval ločeno od vsakdanjega poznavanja teh trgov.
It would be unnecessarily remote from the very markets it is designed to regulate, operating in isolation from those with day-to-day knowledge of those markets.
Njegov obstoj in delovanje bi bil v nasprotju z dolgoročnim ciljem, da bi nadomestili ureditev ex ante s konkurenčno zakonodajo, tako da bi ureditvena gotovost postala manj gotova, evropska ureditev pa manj predvidljiva.
Its existence and operation contradicts the long-term goal to replace ex-ante regulation by competition law, making regulatory certainty less certain and European regulation less predictable.
Komisija na ta način ne more bistveno zmanjšati upravnih stroškov, pač pa bi delovanje agencije preusmerila z njene osrednje usmeritve na dodatna področja, ki so povezana z ENISO.
The Commission does not stand o cut much in terms of administration costs and would only undermine the central focus of the agency, by tagging on unrelated issues of ENISA.
Nazaj k osnovam: organ BERT
Back to Basics: BERT
Poročevalka trdi, da ne bi smeli prehitro opustiti pozitivnih lastnosti sedanje skupine evropskih regulatorjev za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, čeprav opaža, da je za njeno prihodnjo uspešnost potrebna reforma.
The rapporteur argues that we should not be too quick to discard the positive qualities found in the current European Regulators Group for electronic communications networks and services (ERG), although notes that some reform is needed for its future success.
Ugotavlja, da je v predlogu Komisije o ustanovitvi EECMA podanih nekaj odgovorov, vendar ne želi ustanoviti odvečne nove evropske agencije.
She notes that a few of the answers are found in the Commissions EECMA proposal, although stops short of creating a cumbersome European agency.
Zato poročevalka predlaga ustanovitev organa evropskih regulatorjev za telekomunikacije (BERT), ki bi prevzel številne funkcije EECMA, ne pa tudi narave težke agencije, in bi temeljil na dobri praksi skupine evropskih regulatorjev ter poenostavil njeno delovanje in delovne metode, pa tudi okrepil obveznost Komisije, da se posvetuje s tem organom in čim bolj upošteva njegova stališča.
Thus, the rapporteur proposes BERT, (the Body of European Regulators in Telecommunications), which would take on many of the functions of the EECMA without taking on the nature of a heavy agency and would be based upon the good practice of the (ERG) whilst streamlining its functioning and working methods, and strengthening the Commission’s obligation to consult this new body and take the utmost account of its views.
Ustanovitev organa BERT na podlagi člena 95 pogodbe o ES bi zajela sedanjo skupino evropskih regulatorjev v evropsko zakonodajo, saj bi pomenila formalno oblikovanje organa, katerega funkcije in pristojnosti so podeljene z uredbo.
The establishment of BERT, based on Article 95 of the EC Treaty, would embed today’s ERG into European law by formally constituting an advisory body whose functions and responsibilities are expressly attributed to it by a regulation.
Tako bi organu BERT zagotovili večjo učinkovitost in legitimnost, kot jo ima skupina evropskih regulatorjev, pri tem pa ohranili učinkovito sodelovanje nacionalnih regulativnih organov in njihove dragocene izkušnje.
This would provide BERT with a greater degree of efficiency and legitimacy than the ERG has today, whilst safeguarding the effective participation of the National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs), and their invaluable on the ground experience.
Kaj naj bi organ BERT opravljal?
What would BERT do?
Gre za neodvisen strokovni svetovalni organ za Komisijo, ki bi bil neodvisen tako od vlad kot od gospodarstva.
BERT would be an independent expert advisor to the Commission and would remain independent both from the governments and from the industry.
Tako kot EECMA bi BERT deloval kot glavno svetovalno telo za Komisijo, pa tudi za posamezne nacionalne regulativne organe, da bi se po vsej Evropski uniji spodbujal usklajen regulativni pristop.
As EECMA, BERT would act as the main advisory body to the Commission, but also to the individual NRA's in order to promote a consistent regulatory approach across the European Union.
Organ BERT bi izražal svoja stališča prosto, ne na zahtevo Komisije, in bi nadalje razvijal današnja poglobljena skupna stališča skupine evropskih regulatorjev o prednostih trgih, vzpostavil program za skladnost za spremljanje delovanja nacionalnih regulativnih organov ter prepoznaval neupravičena odstopanja.
BERT would express its views freely and not only upon the request of the Commission and would further develop today's ERG detailed common positions on priority markets, establish a compliance programme to track NRA action and identify any unjustified divergences.
Za sedanje usklajevalno razmerje na podlagi načela subsidiarnosti obstaja neki raison d'être , notranji trg pa je v resnici še vedno nabor številnih različnih manjših trgov s svojimi značilnostmi in lastno dinamiko.
The current balance of coordination, based on the subsidiary principle, has its particular raison d'être and the reality of the internal market is that it is still a collection of many different sub-markets, with their own particular characteristics and dynamics.
Zato skladnost v regulativnih posegih dejansko pomeni zagotavljanje, da urejanje poteka sorazmerno in da se pri tem obravnavajo posebna konkurenčna vprašanja, ki se porajajo v nekem času in kraju; za to so najbolj pristojni tamkajšnji nacionalni regulativni organi.
Coherence in regulatory intervention therefore actually means ensuring that regulation is applied proportionately, whilst addressing the specific competition issues that arise at a particular place and time, and the best placed to do so are the NRAs who are on the ground.
Seveda naloge ENISE ne bi bile zajete v področje delovanja organa BERT, ne samo zaradi premajhne sinergije med njunimi pristojnostmi, pač pa zato, ker bi to oviralo njegovo nedovisnost.
The tasks of the ENISA would of course not be included in BERT's remit, not only due to the lack of synergy between their respective responsibilities, but moreover as such a move might hamper its independence.
Politika spektra, sestava in pristojnosti različnih nacionalnih regulativnih organov se med državami članicami razlikujejo, saj vsi nacinoalni regulativni organi nimajo pristojnosti s tega področja.
Spectrum policy, the composition and competences of the different NRAs vary from one Member State to another as not all NRAs have competence in this area.
Organ BERT bo v celoti odgovoren in pregleden za pristojne Evropske institucije.
BERT shall be fully accountable and transparent to the relevant European institutions.
Sestavljali ga bodo predstavniki vseh nacionalnih regulativnih organov držav članic, kar zdaj velja za sestavo evropske skupine regulatorjev.
BERT will be composed of the representatives of each of the Member States’ NRAs as is currently the set-up in the ERG.
Njegova sestava bo dosti lažja kot sestava EECMA, vseeno pa bo imel lastno osebje, s čimer bo zagotovljena njegova nedovisnost od Komisije in držav članic.
It will have a much lighter structure than EECMA, but will have its own staff in order to guarantee its independence from both the Commission and from Member States.
Odbor regulatorjev bodo sestavljali predstavniki 27 nacionalnih regulativnih organov.
The Board of Regulators will be composed of the representatives of the 27 NRAs.
Da bi okrepili odgovornost, preglednost in prepoznavnost organa BERT, bo vzpostavljeno tudi mesto generalnega direktorja.
In order to enhance the accountability, transparency and visibility of BERT, the post of a Managing Director would be created.
Evropski parlament bi ga lahko povabil k sodelovanju v razpravah, poslance pa bi lahko obveščal o delu in napredku organa BERT.
The European Parliament could invite the director to participate in its debates and inform the Members about the work and progress made in BERT.
Dajal bi tudi najnovejše informacije o dogajanju na evropskem trgu elektronskih komunikacij.
He would also give updated information on the development of the European market in electronic communications.
Financiranje in preglednost
Financing and Transparency
Države članice bodo nacionalnim regulativnim organom s predpisi zagotovile zadostna sredstva za ustrezne prispevke za BERT.
Provisions shall be made in each of the Member States to ensure that NRAs have sufficient funding to be able to contribute properly to BERT.
Vključitev organa BERT v sistem Skupnosti zagotavlja njegovo odgovornost in preglednost.
Bringing BERT into the Community system gives assurances as to its accountability and transparency.
Da bo prejemal sredstva evropskih skupnosti, bo moral izpolnjevati nekatere evropske zahteve in financerjem utemeljevati svoje račune.
BERT will have to meet certain European requirements in order to keep receiving funding from the European Communities and will have to explain its accounts to its financers.
Skupno financiranje bo organu BERT zagotovilo večjo neodvisnost in učinkovitost, kot jo ima sedaj skupina evropskih regulatorjev, spodbudilo pa bo tudi nacionalne regulativne organe, da mu bodo nudili visokokakovostno pomoč, saj bodo prispevali k njegovemu delovanju.
Co-funding provides a greater assurance of BERTs independence and effectiveness than that currently enjoyed by the ERG and encourages NRAs to provide high quality assistance to BERT as they contribute to its functioning.
Ko je bilo že omenjeno, bo BERT odgovoren za svoje delovanje.
As mentioned above, BERT will be accountable for its actions.
Pripravil bo letno poročilo o svojih dejavnostih, ki bo objavljeno.
BERT will produce a comprehensive annual report on its activities, which shall be made publicly available.
Njegove račune bo nadzoroval odbor za proračunski nadzor.
BERTs accounts will be subject to the scrutiny of the budgetary control committee.
Da se zagotovi preglednost, bo generalni direktor vsako leto dal izjavo o svojih interesih.
In order to guarantee transparency, the Managing Director will give an annual account of his interests.
Generalnega direktorja bo izbral odbor regulatorjev, postopek pa bosta nadzorovala tudi Evropska komisija in Evropski parlament, ki sta zadolžena za dajanje nezavezujočih mnenj o predlaganem kandidatu.
Whilst the selection of a Managing Director shall be made by the Board of Regulators, the process will also be overseen by the European Commission and the European Parliament, who are charged with the task of issuing non binding opinions on the proposed candidate.
Poleg tega bo lahko Evropski parlament zahteval od generalnega direktorja in/ali drugih članov odbora regulatorjev informativna poročila ali navzočnost pri predstavitvah.
Furthermore, the European Parliament shall be able to request that the Managing Director and/or any other Member of the Board of Regulators present it with informed briefings or attend hearings.
Jasna naloga: jasen časovni okvir
A Clear Mission : A Clear Timeframe
Ne smemo pozabiti, da je potreba po nekem organu le začasna.
The temporality of a need for a body should not be forgotten.
BERT bi bil prehoden organ, ki bi obstajal le toliko časa, da se konkurenčna zakonodaja in trgi razvijejo do te mere, da urejanje ex-ante ne bo več potrebno.
BERT would be a transitory body that would exist until competition law and markets evolve to the point where ex-ante regulation is no longer needed.
Ker bi torej tovrstno telo imelo kratko življenjsko dobo, je bolj smiselno opraviti to nalogo s prožnim organom BERT kot težkokategornim komisijskim aparatom v obliki organa EECMA.
Considering that this entity should thus have a short life-span, it makes more sense to travel this route with a flexible BERT rather than with a heavy piece of Commission apparatus in the form of EECMA.
Njegova naloga ne sme biti dvoumna: popolnoma jasno mora biti, da je njegova naloga zgolj vzpostaviti osnovne pogoje za telekomunikacijski trg, tako da bo ta slej ko prej lahko deloval zgolj po splošni konkurenčni zakonodaji.
There should be no doubt as to its mission: it should be absolutely clear that it has no other purpose than to develop prime conditions for the telecom market so that the latter may as soon as possible operate solely under general competition law.
Komisija predlaga ustanovitev novega neodvisnega organa, ki bo deloval v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in Komisijo.
The Commission is proposing a new independent Electronic Communications Market Authority working in close cooperation with the national regulatory authorities and the Commission.
Kot je mogoče razbrati iz predloga, naj bi novi organ vključeval odbor regulatorjev, sestavljen iz vodij nacionalnih regulativnih organov vseh držav članic EU, in naj bi nadomestil Skupino evropskih regulatorjev (SER).
According to the proposal, the new Authority will include a board of regulators comprising the heads of the national regulatory authorities of all EU Member States and will replace the European Regulators Group.
Komisija predlaga, da naj bi nova agencija zagotavljala strokovno svetovanje Komisiji, zlasti pri pripravi regulativnih sklepov, pospeševala notranji trg z večjo doslednostjo pri uporabi pravil ter delovala kot center strokovnega znanja za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve na ravni EU.
The Commission proposes that the new agency will provide it with expert advice, notably to prepare regulatory decisions, and to further the internal market by improving consistency in the application of EU rules, and will act as a centre of expertise for electronic communication networks and services at EU level.
Prevzela naj bi tudi naloge Evropske agencije za varnost omrežij (ENISA) in tako odpravila veliko težav, ki so bile odkrite pri delovanju te agencije.
The new Authority would also take over the functions of the European Network Security Agency (ENISA), thereby overcoming many of the problems that have been identified in the operation of ENISA.
Glavne naloge novega organa
Main tasks of the new Authority
Organ bi na evropski ravni dopolnjeval ( ne podvajal, kot poudarja Komisija) regulativne funkcije, ki jih na nacionalni ravni izvajajo regulativni organi, tako da bi:
The Authority would complement (and not duplicate , as the Commission stresses) at European level the regulatory tasks performed at national level by the regulatory authorities by:
Ø zagotavljal okvir za sodelovanje nacionalnih regulatorjev,
Ø Providing a framework for national regulators to cooperate
Ø izvajal regulativni nadzor na področju opredelitve trga, analize in uporabe popravljalnih ukrepov,
Ø Regulatory oversight of market definition, analysis and the implementation of remedies
Ø poskrbel za opredelitev nadnacionalnih trgov,
Ø Definition of trans-national markets
Ø svetoval glede usklajevanja radijskih frekvenc,
Ø Advice on radio frequency harmonisation
Ø imel pooblastila za odločanje o upravljanju številčenja in svetoval glede prenosljivosti številk,
Ø Decision powers on numbering administration and advice on number portability
Ø Varnost omrežij in informacij
Ø Network and information security
Ø opravljal splošne informativne in svetovalne funkcije.
Ø General informational and advisory functions
Stroški za novi telekomunikacijski organ naj bi v obdobju 2010–2013 po oceni Komisije znašali 88,3 milijona EUR, od tega naj bi odhodki iz poslovanja znašali 34 milijonov EUR in upravni odhodki 54,3 milijona EUR (od tega 39,2 milijona EUR za človeške vire in 15,1 milijona EUR za druge upravne odhodke).
For the full period 2010 - 2013 the cost of the new Telecom Authority as proposed by the Commission will be EUR 88,3m, of which EUR 34m will be operational expenditure and EUR 54,3m administrative expenditure (EUR 39,2m for human resources and EUR 15,1m for other administrative expenditure).
Letni proračun je ocenjen na 10 milijonov EUR v prvem letu, s tretjim letom pa naj bi se povečal na 28 milijonov EUR.
The annual budget is estimated at EUR 10m in the first year, rising to EUR 28m from year 3 onwards.
Organ naj bi se poleg prispevkov Skupnosti financiral tudi s pristojbinami in dajatvami za nekatere storitve.
In addition to the Community contribution, the Authority may collect fees and charges for some services.
Prihodki organa od opravljenih storitev naj bi se porabili za financiranje njegove dejavnosti.
It is estimated that the Authority will expand up to a permanent staff of 134 once fully established.
Ko bo organ dokončno vzpostavljen, naj bi se število stalno zaposlenih povečalo na 134, pri čemer je že upoštevan prevzem nalog in virov agencije ENISA leta 2011.
This includes taking over the tasks and resources of ENISA in 2011.
Ko opozarja Komisija, je treba od teh stroškov odšteti prihranke, ki bodo doseženi z vključitvijo agencije ENISA v predlagani organ.
Against these costs, as the Commission remarks, should be set the savings achieved by incorporating ENISA into the proposed Authority.
Trenutni letni proračun agencije ENISA znaša približno 8 milijonov EUR.
The current annual budget of ENISA is around EUR 8m.
Kljub pričakovanim prihrankom zaradi zaprtja agencije ENISA je Komisija v finančnem poročilu že opozorila, da bo predlog za novo agencijo zahteval ponovno programiranje ustreznega razdelka v finančni perspektivi.
Despite these expected savings due to the closing down of ENISA the Commission already notes in the financial statement that the current proposal for the new agency will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the financial perspective.
S proračunskega stališča pripravljavka mnenja priporoča, da se ustanovitvi organa za trg elektronskih komunikacij nasprotuje zaradi negotovosti glede njegovega financiranja.
From a budgetary point of view , your draftswoman recommends to object to the setting-up of the new Electronic Communications Market Authority on grounds of uncertainties regarding its financing.
Do te ugotovitve je prišla iz naslednjih razlogov:
She has come to this conclusion for the following reasons:
1) Novi organ za trg elektronskih komunikacij se mora financirati iz podrazdelka 1a večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje od 2007 do 2013, v katerem so rezerve zdaj še posebej omejene.
1) The new Electronic Communications Market Authority has to be financed under subheading 1a of the multiannual financial framework 2007 - 2013 where margins have become particularly limited.
Komisija je v finančnem poročilu že nakazala, da bo zaradi vzpostavitve telekomunikacijske agencije potrebno reprogramiranje v podrazdelku 1a,
And indeed, the Commission already indicated in the financial statement of its proposal that the setting-up of the Telecom Agency will require a re-programming in subheading 1a.
vendar ni navedla podrobnosti o tem.
However, no further details of this exercise have been provided.
Financiranje nove agencije za telekomunikacije ni vključeno ne v zadnji finančni načrt Komisije z dne 31. januarja 2008 ne v tabele, priložene letni strategiji politik za 2009, v katerih je navedeno zgolj, da se bo ta organ „financiral delno s prerazporeditvijo v okviru področja informacijske družbe, delno pa s povečanjem v višini 37,5 milijona EUR za obdobje 2009–2013“ .
The financing of the new Telecom Agency is included neither in the Commission's last financial programming of 31 January 2008 nor in the tables annexed to the APS for 2009, in which it is simply stated that the agency, to be created in 2010, " will be financed through partial redeployment within the information society policy area and partly by an increase of EUR 37,5m for the period 2009-2013. "
2) S tem v zvezi je treba znova poudariti, da agencije, kot je nova agencija iz tega predloga, izvajajo tudi upravne naloge.
2) In this context, it has to be pointed out once more that agencies such as the new agency proposed here also fulfil administrative tasks.