natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– nanostrukturnimi materiali, opredeljenimi kot materiali, „ki imajo notranjo ali površinsko strukturo v nanovelikosti“, npr. z vrzelmi majhnih dimenzij,
– nano-structured materials, defined as materials “having an internal or surface structure at the nanoscale”, e.g. exhibiting cavities of small dimensions,
H. ker skoraj neomejena uporaba nanotehnologij v različnih sektorjih, kot so elektronika, tekstil, biomedicina, izdelki za osebno nego, čistila, živilski ali energetski sektor, onemogoča vzpostavitev enotnega ureditvenega okvira na ravni Skupnosti,
H. whereas the almost infinite application of nanotechnologies to such diverse sectors as electronics, textiles, biomedicals, personal care products, cleaning products, food or energy makes it impossible to introduce a single regulatory framework at Community level,
I. ker ni na voljo jasnih informacij o dejanski rabi nanomaterialov v izdelkih za potrošnike, kot v naslednjih primerih:
I. whereas there is no clear information about the actual use of nanomaterials in consumer products, for instance:
– seznami priznanih ustanov navajajo, da je na trgu več kot 800 izdelkov za potrošnike na osnovi nanomaterialov, ki jih kot take navajajo proizvajalci, vendar panožna združenja istih proizvajalcev dvomijo o resničnosti teh navedb, saj naj bi bile pretirane, hkrati pa sami ne navajajo nobenih podatkov,
– while inventories by renowned institutions list more than 800 manufacturer-identified nanotechnology-based consumer products currently on the market, trade associations of the same manufacturers question these figures, on the basis that they are overestimations, without providing any concrete figures themselves,
– podjetja zaradi pozitivnega tržnega učinka izraza „nanomateriali“ brez zadržkov uporabljajo trditve o njihovi uporabi, po drugi strani pa so odločno proti objektivnim zahtevam po označevanju,
– while companies happily use "nano-claims", as the term “nano” seems to have a positive marketing effect, they are strictly opposed to objective labelling requirements,
J. ker bo vprašanje dejanske uporabe nanomaterialov v izdelkih za potrošnike verjetno še naprej ostalo nejasno, če ne bodo uvedene jasne zahteve za obveščanje o uporabi nanomaterialov in če se direktiva 2006/114/ES,
J. whereas the lack of clarity about the actual use of nanomaterials in consumer products is unlikely to change, unless there are clear notification requirements on the use of nanomaterials, as well as full enforcement of Directive 2006/114/EC,
K. ker se v predstavitvah možnih koristi nanotehnologij napoveduje skoraj neskončna raznolikost uporab nanomaterialov v prihodnosti, niso pa predstavljene zanesljive informacije o sedanjih načinih uporabe,
K. whereas presentations about the potential benefits of nanotechnologies predict an almost infinite diversity of future applications of nanomaterials , but fail to provide reliable information about current uses,
L. ker poteka velika razprava o možnosti ocenjevanja varnosti nanomaterialov, ker znanstveni odbori in agencije Evropske unije opozarjajo na velike pomanjkljivosti v ključnih podatkih in celo v metodah pridobivanja takšnih podatkov; ker mora zato Evropska unija bolj vlagati v ustrezneo ocenjevanje nanomaterialov, da bi odpravila vrzeli v znanju ter čim prej v sodelovanju s svojimi agencijami in mednarodnimi partnerji razvila metode za ocenjevanje ter ustrezno in usklajeno meroslovje in nomenklaturo,
L. whereas there is a major debate about the possibility of assessing the safety of nanomaterials; whereas the scientific committees and Agencies of the European Union point to major deficiencies not only in key data, but even in methods of obtaining such data; whereas the European Union thus needs to invest more into adequate assessment of nanomaterials to close the knowledge gaps and to develop and implement as fast as possible, and, in collaboration with its agencies and international partners, methods of evaluation and an appropriate and harmonised metrology and nomenclature,
M. ker je odbor SCENIHR ugotovil nekaj posebnih nevarnosti za zdravje in strupenih učinkov na okoljske organizme pri nekaterih nanomaterialih ter ob upoštevanju, da te ugotovitve kažejo na morebitne nevarnosti, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati,
M. whereas SCENIHR identified some specific health hazards as well as toxic effects on environmental organisms for some nanomaterials, and considered that these observations indicate potential hazards which should be taken into consideration,
N. ker je odbor SCENIHR ugotovil tudi splošno pomanjkanje visokokakovostnih podatkov o izpostavljenosti za ljudi in okolje in pričakuje, da se bodo postopki za ocenjevanje še naprej razvijali, dokler ne bo na voljo dovolj znanstvenih informacij za podroben opis morebitnih škodljivih učinkov za ljudi in okolje, in tako zaključuje, da je treba nadaljevati z razvojem, preverjanjem in standardizacijo znanja o metodologiji za ocene izpostavljenosti in ugotavljanje nevarnosti,
N. whereas SCENIHR furthermore found a general lack of high quality exposure data both for humans and the environment and expects risk assessment procedures to remain under development until there is sufficient scientific information available to characterise the possible harmful effects on humans and the environment, thus concluding that the knowledge on the methodology for both exposure estimates and hazard identification needs to be further developed, validated and standardised,
O. ker so dokazi o nevarnostih pri nekaterih nanomaterialih skupaj s splošnim pomanjkanjem metod za ustrezno oceno tveganj nanomaterialov razlog za zaskrbljenost,
O. whereas the combination of evidence of hazards for certain nanomaterials and the overall lack of methods to properly assess the risks of nanomaterials is a reason for concern,
P. ker so sedanja finančna sredstva, namenjena okoljskim, zdravstvenim in varnostnim vidikom nanomaterialov v sedmem okvirnem programu za raziskave veliko premajhna, ker so tudi ocenjevalna merila za odobritev raziskovalnih projektov za ocenjevanje varnosti nanomaterialov v sedmem okvirnem programu preveč omejevalna (tj. da so ozko usmerjena k inovacijam) in tako ne spodbujajo v zadostni meri nujnega razvoja znanstvenih metod za ocenjevanje nanomaterialov, ker je bistveno, da se nameni dovolj sredstev za financiranje raziskav o varnem razvoju in uporabi nanomaterialov,
P. whereas current funding into the environmental, health and safety aspects of nanomaterials in FP7 is far too low; whereas moreover the evaluation criteria for granting research projects to assess the safety of nanomaterials under FP7 are too restrictive (i.e. they have a narrow innovation bias), and thus do not sufficiently promote the urgent development of scientific methods to assess nanomaterials; whereas it is essential to allocate sufficient resources for research on the safe development and use of nanomaterials,
Q. ker znanje o morebitnih vplivih na zdravje in okolje precej zaostaja za hitrostjo dogajanja na trgu in s tem sproža temeljna vprašanja o tem, ali je s sedanjim modelom upravljanja mogoče obravnavati nove tehnologije v realnem času,
Q. whereas the knowledge about potential health and environmental impacts lags significantly behind the pace of market developments, thus raising fundamental questions about the ability of the current governance model to deal with emerging technologies in "real time",
R. ker je Parlament v skladu s previdnostnim načelom v svoji resoluciji z dne 28. septembra 2006 o nanoznanostih in nanotehnologijah pozval k raziskavi o učinkih nanodelcev, ki niso lahko topni ali biološko razgradljivi, preden se takšni delci začnejo proizvajati in dajati na trg,
R. whereas, in its resolution of 28 September 2006 on nanosciences and nanotechnologies Parliament had called for investigation of the effects of nanoparticles that are not readily soluble or biodegradable, in accordance with the precautionary principle, before such particles are put into production and placed on the market,
S. ker je pomen sporočila Komisije o regulativnih vidikih nanomaterialov zaradi pomanjkanja informacij o posebnih lastnostih nanomaterialov, njihovi dejanski rabi ter možnih tveganjih in koristih relativno omejen, zato je tudi težko presoditi, kakšen je lahko njihov poseben doprinos v primerjavi s konvencionalnimi nanotehnologijami, materiali in snovmi,
S. whereas the value of the Commission Communication on "Regulatory aspects of nanomaterials" is rather limited due to the absence of information about the specific properties of nanomaterials, their actual uses, and potential risks and benefits, which also makes it difficult to judge their specific added value compared to conventional technologies, materials and substances,
T. ker je Komisija predstavila zgolj splošen pregled ustrezne zakonodaje Skupnosti, pri tem pa ni opisala posebnosti nanomaterialov in s tem povezanih izzivov,
T. whereas the Commission presented only a general overview of the relevant Community legislation , without considering the specific nature of nanomaterials and the resulting challenges,
U. ker je iz pregleda Komisije razvidno, da v zakonodaji Skupnosti zaenkrat ni določb, ki bi se specifično nanašale na nanomateriale,
U. whereas the Commission’s overview shows that there are no nano-specific provisions in Community legislation for the time being,
V. ker bi bilo treba nanomateriale vključiti v mnogoteren, diferenciiran in prilagodljiv zakonodajni okvir, ki bi temeljil na previdnostnem načelu ter na načelu odgovornosti proizvajalca, da bi se zagotovila varna proizvodnja, uporaba in odlaganje nanomaterialov pred dajanjem tehnologije na trg, pri čemer se je treba izogniti avtomatskem poseganju po splošni prepovedi ali enakemu obravnavanju različnih načinov uporabe nanomaterialov,
V. whereas nanomaterials should be covered by a multi-faceted, differentiated and adaptive body of law based on the precautionary principle and on the principle of producer responsibility to ensure the safe production, use and disposal of nanomaterials before the technology is put on the market, while avoiding systematic recourse to general moratoria or undifferentiated treatment of different applications of nanomaterials,
W. ker je bilo v okviru uredbe REACH že dogovorjeno, da je potrebno nadaljnje usmerjanje in svetovanje o nanomaterialih, zlasti o prepoznavanju snovi, ter prilagajanje metod ocenjevanja tveganja,
W. whereas, in the context of REACH, it has already been agreed that further guidance and advice on nanomaterials, in particular on substance identification, as well as an adaptation of risk assessment methods is needed,
X. ker natančnejši ogled uredbe REACH razkrije več pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z nanomateriali, na primer:
X. whereas a closer look at REACH reveals several deficiencies to deal with nanomaterials, for example:
– mejne vrednosti za količino morda niso ustrezne, saj lastnosti in možna tveganja nanomaterialov v bolj določajo število delcev, površinska struktura in površinska aktivnost, kot pa njihova količina,
– the tonnage thresholds might not be adequate, as the properties and potential risks of nanomaterial are determined to a greater extent by particle number, surface structure and surface activity than by their tonnage,
– ocena izpostavljenosti je obvezna le za snovi, ki jih proizvajalec proizvaja v količini več kot 10 ton na leto, in če je zanje ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila za razvrstitev kot nevarne v skladu z direktivo 67/548/EGS
– an exposure assessment only becomes mandatory for substances produced by a manufacturer above 10 tonnes/year and if they have been found to meet the criteria for classification as dangerous in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 67/548/EGS z dne 27. junija 1967 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov v zvezi z razvrščanjem, pakiranjem in označevanjem nevarnih snovi (UL 196, 16.8.1967, str.
Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances, OJ 196, 16.8.1967, p.
1). ; vendar lahko glede na sedanje težave pri ugotavljanju nevarnosti do ocene sploh ne pride, ker nevarnosti na podlagi sedanje metodologije niso ugotovljene, čeprav je ocena izpostavljenosti zelo pomembna za pravilno oceno tveganja nanomaterialov,
1. ; however, given the current difficulties with hazard identification, an exposure assessment may well not be provided due to non-identification of hazards on the basis of existing methodology, even though an exposure assessment is crucial for a proper risk assessment of nanomaterials,
– zahteve za obveščanje iz uredbe REACH za snovi v izdelkih se nanašajo le na tiste snovi, ki vzbujajo veliko skrb, ki so na seznamu in kadar so prisotne v koncentracijah nad 0,1 % mase na maso v izdelku, njihova skupna količina v teh artiklih na proizvajalca na leto pa presega eno tono; vendar zdaj na seznamu snovi ni niti enega nanomateriala, izdelava takšnega seznama pa bo glede na težave z ugotavljanjem nevarnosti nanomaterialov težavna in četudi bi bile te težave odpravljene, nanomateriali po vsej verjetnosti ne bi presegli mejnih vrednosti za količino in koncentracijo, tako da je verjetnost, da bo uredba REACH v sedanji obliki privedla do obveščanja o nanomaterialih v artiklih, zelo majhna,
– the REACH notification requirements for substances in articles only concern substances of very high concern that are on the candidate list and when they are present in concentrations above 0,1 % by weight in the article and in a total quantity of over one tonne in those articles per producer per year; however, as not a single nanomaterial is currently on the candidate list, such listing will be difficult in light of the problems with hazard identification of nanomaterials, and even if those problems could be overcome, the nanomaterials would most likely not exceed the tonnage and concentration thresholds, so that it is highly unlikely that REACH in its current form will lead to notification of nanomaterials in articles,
Y. ker v odsotnosti določb, ki bi se nanašale na nanomateriale, obstaja tveganje za nepravilno uporabo zakonodaje o odpadkih, na primer:
Y. whereas waste legislation in the absence of nano-specific provisions may not apply correctly, for example:
– ustrezna obdelava odpadkov je med drugim odvisna od nevarnosti odpadka (npr. merila za sprejem različnih odpadkov na odlagališčih), vendar se ne bo uporabljala za nanomateriale, dokler ne bo na voljo dogovorjene metode za ugotavljanje nevarnosti, kar bo povzročilo nespecifično obdelavo nanomaterialov glede na splošne lastnosti odpadkov, v katerih bodo končali (od komunalnih trdnih odpadkov do nevarnih odpadkov),
– adequate waste treatment depends inter alia on the hazardousness of a waste (e.g. acceptance criteria for different wastes in a landfill), but will not apply for nanomaterials as long as there is no agreed method for hazard identification, thus leading to non-specific treatment of nanomaterials depending on the general nature of the waste they end up in (anything from municipal solid waste to hazardous waste),
– mejne vrednosti emisij za sežig odpadkov se uporabljajo le za nekatera znana onesnaževala, za nanomateriale pa ne, čeprav bi bilo morda treba nekatere razvrstiti kot onesnaževala, ali pa bi zanje morda morale veljati posebne zahteve (npr. ogljikove nanocevi, ki imajo lahko azbestu podobne lastnosti, so stabilne do zelo visokih temperatur),
– emission limit values for waste incineration only apply to certain known pollutants and not for nanomaterials, even though some might have to be classified as pollutants, or might have special requirements (e.g. carbon nanotubes, which can present asbestos-like properties, are stable until very high temperatures),
Z. ker je v številnih predlogih sprememb v zvezi z nanomateriali, ki so bili sprejeti v dogovoru iz prve obravnave med Svetom in Evropskim parlamentom v okviru prenovitve direktive o kozmetičnih izdelkih
Z. whereas the significant amendments concerning nanomaterials adopted in a first reading agreement between the Council and the European Parliament in the context of the recast of the cosmetics directive
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. marca 2009, Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0158 . ter v številnih predlogih spremembe, ki jih je Evropski parlament sprejel na prvi obravnavi v okviru revizije uredbe o novih živilih
Position of the European Parliament of 24 March 2009, Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0158 . , and the significant amendments adopted by the European Parliament in the first reading of the review of the regulation on novel food
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. marca 2009, Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0171 . , poudarjeno, da je treba za ustrezno obravnavo nanomaterialov brez dvoma spremeniti zakonodajo Skupnosti,
Position of the European Parliament of 25 March 2009, Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0171 . , respectively, highlight the clear need to amend Community legislation to address nanomaterials adequately,
Aa. ker je sedanja razprava o regulativnih vidikih nanomaterialov močno omejena na strokovnjake, čeprav lahko zaradi nanomaterialov pride do obsežnih družbenih sprememb, za kar sta potrebna široka javna razprava in polno sodelovanje javnosti pri odločanju,
Aa. whereas the current debate about regulatory aspects of nanomaterials is largely limited to expert circles, even though nanomaterials have the potential to bring about far-ranging societal change, which requires wide-ranging public consultation and full public participation in decision-making,
Ab. ker bi lahko široka uporaba patentov za nanomateriale, visoki stroški za patentiranje in pomanjkanje olajšav da dostop do patentov za zelo mala ter za mala in srednja podjetja zavrla prihodnje inovacije,
Ab. whereas a broad application of patents to nanomaterials, as well as the excessive cost of patenting and the absence of patent access facilities for very small businesses and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), could stifle further innovation,
Ac. ker bo verjetno prišlo do združevanja nanotehnologije z biotehnologijo, biologijo, kognitivnimi vedami in informacijsko tehnologijo, kar odpira resna etična vprašanja ter vprašanja v zvezi z varnostjo in spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic, ki jih je treba analizirati v novem mnenju evropske skupine za etiko v znanosti in novih tehnologijah,
Ac. whereas the likely convergence of nanotechnology with biotechnology, biology, cognitive sciences and information technology raises serious questions relating to ethics, safety, security and respect for fundamental rights that need to be analysed by a new opinion of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies,
Ad. ker je kodeks ravnanja zelo pomemben instrument za varne, celostne in odgovorne raziskave nanomaterialov; ker morajo ta kodeks sprejeti in spoštovati vsi proizvajalci, ki nameravajo proizvajati ali dajati blago v promet,
Ad. whereas the Code of Conduct is an essential instrument for safe, integrated and responsible research in nanomaterials; whereas the Code of Conduct must be adopted and respected by all producers intending to manufacture or place goods on the market,
Ae. ker morajo biti previdnostno načelo, načelo, da plača povzročitelj obremenitve, ter trajnostni cilji osnova za orientacijski in regulativni okvir za nanotehnologije in nanomateriale, ta načela in cilji pa morajo tudi voditi razvoj nanotehnologij in nanomaterialov k večji uporabnosti in koristnosti za družbo,
Ae. whereas the precautionary principle, the polluter-pays principle and sustainability objectives should form the basis of the regulatory and guidance framework for nanotechnologies and nanomaterials, and these principles and objectives should help steer the development of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials towards uses that are of greatest benefit to society,
4. meni, da zgolj z boljšim izvajanjem obstoječe zakonodaje ni mogoče doseči potrebne ravni varnosti, dokler zakonodaja ne vsebuje določb, ki se specifično nanašajo na nanomateriale, niti metod za ustrezno oceno z njimi povezanih tveganj;
Considers that as long as current legislation does not contain any nano-specific provisions, and as long as data and methods to adequately assess the risks of nanomaterials are missing, better implementation of current law alone cannot bring about the necessary level of protection;
8. poudarja, da je pregled nujen že zaradi ustrezne zaščite zdravja ljudi in okolja, pa tudi zaradi zagotavljanja gotovosti in predvidljivosti gospodarskim akterjem in zaupanja javnosti;
Stresses that such review is not only necessary to adequately protect human health and the environment, but also to provide certainty and predictability to economic operators as well as public confidence;
– poenostavljeno registracijo proizvedenih ali uvoženih nanomaterialov (z mejno vrednostjo na podlagi na primer površinske aktivnosti namesto količine) ob zagotavljanju osnovnih podatkov o fizikalno-kemijskih lastnosti ter toksikoloških in ekotoksikoloških učinkih,
– simplified registration for nanomaterials manufactured or imported (with a threshold based on for instance surface activity instead of tonnage), providing core data on physico-chemical properties as well as toxicological and ecotoxicological effects,
– poročilo o kemijski varnosti z oceno izpostavljenosti za vse registrirane nanomateriale, ne glede na ugotovljene nevarnosti,
– a chemical safety report with exposure assessment for all registered nanomaterials irrespective of hazard identification,
– zahteve za obveščanje za vse nanomateriale, dane v promet kot takšne, v pripravkih ali v izdelkih, ne glede na mejne vrednosti za količino in koncentracijo;
– notification requirements for all nanomaterials placed on the market on their own, in preparations or in articles irrespective of tonnage and concentration thresholds;
– poseben vnos za nanomateriale na seznamu odpadkov iz direktive 2000/532/ES
– a separate entry for nanomaterials in the list of waste established by Decision 2000/532/EC
Odločba Komisije z dne 3. maja 2000 o nadomestitvi Odločbe 94/3/ES o oblikovanju seznama odpadkov skladno s členom 1(a) Direktive Sveta 75/442/EGS o odpadkih in Odločbe Sveta 94/904/ES o oblikovanju seznama nevarnih odpadkov skladno s členom 1(4) Direktive Sveta 91/689/EGS o nevarnih odpadkih (UL L 226, 6.9.2000, str.
Commission Decision of 3 May 2000 replacing Decision 94/3/EC establishing a list of wastes pursuant to Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and Council Decision 94/904/EC establishing a list of hazardous waste pursuant to Article 1(4) of Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste, OJ L 226, 6.9.2000, p.
– revizija meril za sprejemanje odpadkov na odlagališčih iz odločbe 2003/33/ES
– a revision of the waste acceptance criteria in landfills in Decision 2003/33/EC
Odločba Sveta z dne 19. decembra 2002 o določitvi meril in postopkov za sprejem odpadkov na odlagališčih v skladu s členom 16 Direktive 1999/31/ES in Prilogo II k tej direktivi (UL L 11, 16.1.2003, str.
Council Decision of 19 December 2002 establishing criteria and procedures for the acceptance of waste at landfills pursuant to Article 16 of and Annex II to Directive 1999/31/EC, OJ L 11, 16.1.2003, p.
– revizija zadevnih mejnih vrednosti emisij za sežiganje odpadkov za dopolnitev meritev na podlagi mase z meritvami na podlagi števila delcev in/ali površine;
– a revision of relevant emission limit values for waste incineration to supplement the mass-based measurements by metrics based on particle number and/or surface;
19. poziva Evropski observatorij za tveganja Agencije za varnost in zdravje pri delu ter države članice, naj si bolj prizadevajo za ozaveščanje javnosti in izmenjavo dobre prakse;
Invites the European Risk Observatory of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work and the Member States to step up their efforts in awareness-raising and the exchange of good practice;