natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A. ker so štiri države članice (Islandija, Lihtenštajn, Norveška in Švica) Evropskega združenja za prosto trgovino (Efta) veliki trgovinski partnerji EU – Švica in Norveška sta po obsegu četrti oziroma peti najpomembnejši trgovinski partner EU,
A. whereas the four European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Members States (Iceland, Lichtenstein, Norway and Switzerland) constitute major trade partners of the European Union (EU), Switzerland and Norway being respectively the fourth and the fifth most important EU trade partners by volume,
B. ker odnosi med EU in tremi državami članicami Efte (Islandija, Lihtenštajn in Norveška) temeljijo na Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (EGP), ki zagotavlja polno sodelovanje na notranjem trgu s sporazumom EGP, katerega upravljanje in spremljanje poteka v visoko institucionaliziranem okviru,
B. whereas relations between the EU and three EFTA Member States (Iceland, Lichtenstein and Norway) are based on the European Economic Area (EEA) which provides for full participation in the internal market with the EEA Agreement managed and monitored in a highly institutionalised framework,
1. meni, da je sporazum EGP ključno gonilo gospodarske rasti; pozdravlja splošno dobre rezultate držav EGP/Efte pri izvajanju zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga, ki jih izkazuje pregled notranjega trga; ugotavlja, da odnosi med EU in Švico pomenijo veliko več izzivov pri izvajanju sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb;
Considers the EEA agreement as a key driver for economic growth; welcomes the overall good track record of the EEA EFTA States in implementing internal market legislation, as demonstrated by the EEA EFTA States Internal Market Scoreboard; notes that relations between the EU and Switzerland pose far more challenges as far as the implementation of the Free Movement of Persons Agreement (FMPA) is concerned;
4. ugotavlja, da se je z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe pojavila negotovost, katera zakonodaja je veljavna za EGP; meni, da bi to lahko povzročilo počasnejše izvajanje zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga v državah EGP/Efte; poziva Komisijo, naj poda oceno stanja;
Notes that with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty uncertainty exists as to which EU legislation is EEA relevant; considers that this might lead to slower implementation of the internal market legislation in the EEA EFTA States; urges the Commission to provide an assessment of the situation;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj formalizira postopek priglasitve novih predpisov in zakonodaje EU, ki sodijo v področje sporazuma EGP, ter tako skrajša obdobje med sprejemom nove zakonodaje in njenim morebitnim prevzemom v državah EGP/Efte;
Calls on the Commission to formalise the notification process of new EU rules and legislation that fall within the scope of the EEA Agreement in order to decrease the gap between the adoption of new legislation and potential take-up by EEA EFTA States;
9. ugotavlja, da so trenutno v razpravi drugi pomembni predlogi zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga, vključno s predlogom direktive o pravicah potrošnikov, ki ga je pripravila Komisija; poziva Komisijo, naj poveča vključenost držav članic EGP/Efte v te razprave;
Notes that other important Internal Market legislation proposals are currently under discussion, including the Commission's proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights; calls on the Commission to increase the involvement of EEA EFTA Member States in those discussions;
Izvajanje predpisov na področju notranjega trga: Švica
Implementation of internal market rules: Switzerland
12. poudarja, da so zlasti naslednji podporni ukrepi nesorazmerni, kar zadeva sporazum o prostem gibanju, in otežujejo malim in srednjim podjetjem opravljanje storitev v Švici; obveznost zagotavljanja predhodnega obvestila z osemdnevno čakalno dobo, zahteva o prispevku za stroške delovanja tristranskih komisij ter prestrogo izvrševanje; v zvezi s tem tudi poziva švicarske organe, naj razveljavijo predpise, ki tuja podjetja, ki zagotavljajo čezmejne storitve, obvezujejo k vložitvi jamstva o finančni integriteti;
Points out that the following supporting measures in particular are disproportionate as regards the agreement on freedom of movement and make it difficult for SMEs to provide services in Switzerland: the obligation in force in Switzerland to provide prior notification with an 8-day waiting period, the requirement to contribute to the enforcement costs of tripartite commissions, and excessively strict enforcement; in this context, also urges the Swiss authorities to repeal regulations which oblige foreign enterprises providing cross-border services to place a guarantee of financial probity;
21. pozdravlja neodvisni trend švicarskih organov, da upoštevajo sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije po podpisu sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb; pozdravlja nedavni sprejem švicarske zakonodaje, ki upošteva načelo iz zadeve „Cassis de Dijon“;
Welcomes the independent trend for Swiss authorities to consider EU Court of Justice case-law that has been handed down after the signing of the FMPA; welcomes the recent adoption of the Swiss legislation to take into account the Cassis de Dijon principle;
24. poziva Komisijo in Švico, naj v kratkem roku poskusita poiskati horizontalne rešitve nekaterih institucionalnih težav, tako da bi se zmanjšala razdrobljenost in povečala preglednost v sistemu odločanja, izboljšala komunikacija med skupnimi odbori, ter pretehtata uvedbo učinkovitega mehanizma reševanja sporov;
Calls on the Commission and Switzerland in the short run to look into ways of finding horizontal solutions to certain institutional issues, to decrease fragmentation and enhance transparency in the decision-making system, to enhance communication between the Joint Committees and to consider the introduction of an effective dispute settlement mechanism;
Štiri države članice (Islandija, Lihtenštajn, Norveška in Švica) Evropskega združenja za prosto trgovino (Efta) so pomembni trgovinski partnerji EU – Švica in Norveška sta po obsegu četrti oziroma peti najpomembnejši trgovinski partner EU.
The four European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Members States (MS) (Iceland, Lichtenstein, Norway and Switzerland) constitute major trade partners of the European Union (EU), Switzerland and Norway being respectively the fourth and the fifth most important EU trade partners by volume.
Poročevalec meni, da so štiri države članice Efte in države članice EU enako pomembne članice skupnega kulturnega prostora, kar zadeva skupne temeljne vrednote ter kulturno in zgodovinsko dediščino.
He considers that the four EFTA MS and the EU MS equally importantly belong to a common cultural area in terms of sharing core values and a cultural and historical heritage.
Odnosi med EU in državami članicami Efte
Relations between the EU and the EFTA MS
Obsega iste „štiri svoboščine“ kot Evropska skupnost, a državam EGP/Efte omogoča tudi sodelovanje v nekaterih spremljajočih politikah, na primer varstvu potrošnikov in okoljski politiki.
It covers the same "four freedoms" as the European Community, but also enables the EEA EFTA countries to participate in certain flanking policies, such as consumer protection and environmental policy.
Sporazum temelji na načelu homogenosti, kar pomeni, da mora biti zakonodaja EGP na področjih, ki sodijo v okvir sporazuma, kar najbliže pravnemu redu EU.
The agreement is based on the principle of homogeneity which means that the EEA legislation in the domains covered by the agreement should be as close as possible to the acquis.
Zelo pomembno je tudi, da se članice EGP/Efte vključijo v razprave o prihodnjih pomembnih aktih v okviru zakonodaje EU, na primer predlogu direktive o pravicah potrošnikov.
It is also of particular importance to engage EEA EFTA members in discussions on the upcoming major pieces of EU legislation, like e.g. the proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights.
Odnose med Švico in EU nadalje urejajo številni dvostranski sporazumi z Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami.
Relations between Switzerland and the EU have been further arranged basing on a number of bilateral agreements with the EC and its MS.
Institucionalni okvir: dva modela gospodarskega povezovanja brez pristopa
Institutional framework: Two different models of economic integration without
Sestavljajo ga veleposlaniki držav EGP/Efte pri EU ter predstavniki Evropske komisije in držav članic EU.
It is made up of ambassadors to the EU from the EEA/EFTA States, representatives of the European Commission and EU MS.
Upravljanje sporazuma EGP poteka v visoko institucionaliziranem okviru: sekretariat Efte je odgovoren za dnevno upravljanje sporazuma EGP.
The EEA agreement is managed in a highly institutionalized framework: The EFTA Secretariat is responsible for the day-to-day management of the EEA Agreement.
Za upravljanje odnosov med EU in Švico takega celovitega institucionalnega okvira ni.
There exists no such comprehensive institutional framework for managing EU-Swiss relations.
Običajno vsak dvostranski sektorski sporazum upravlja posebni skupni odbor, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki pogodbenic.
Each bilateral sectoral agreement is generally managed by a separate Joint Committee composed of representatives of the contracting parties.
Na strani EU glavno vlogo igra Evropska komisija.
On the side of the EU, the key role is played by the European Commission.
Tako sporazum EGP kot tudi dvostranski sporazumi predvidevajo poseben postopek za upoštevanje novega pravnega reda EU.
Both the EEA Agreement and the bilateral Agreements provide for a specific procedure to take into account the new acquis.
Ko je sprejet nov ukrep, ki velja za EGP, sekretariat Efte pripravi sklep skupnega odbora za spremembo priloge ustreznega sporazuma, ki ga skupni odbor običajno pozneje sprejme.
Whenever a new measure with EEA relevance is adopted, the EFTA Secretariat drafts a Joint Committee decision to amend the annex of the respective agreement, which is normally adopted later by the Joint Committee.
Če ustave držav EGP/Efte zahtevajo potrditev v parlamentu ali na referendumu, lahko začne sklep veljati šele, ko je izpolnjen ta pogoj.
If the EEA EFTA countries' constitutions require an approval by the parliament or by referendum, the entry into force is possible only after the fulfilment of this requirement.
Kar zadeva dvostranske sporazume, ustrezne sklepe po pogajanjih med pogodbenicama pripravi pristojni skupni odbor Švica-EU.
As regards the bilateral Agreements the corresponding decision is made by the competent Swiss-EU Joint Committee, following negotiations between the contracting parties.
Skupni odbori lahko spreminjajo samo priloge sporazumov ali njihove dodatke, če so ti tehnične narave.
Joint Committees can only change annexes to the agreements or their appendices in so far as these are of a technical nature.
Razen ene izjeme pa ne morejo spreminjati glavnih določb sporazumov.
Besides one exception, however, they can not change the main provisions of the agreements.
Glavne ugotovitve osnutka poročila
Main findings of the Draft Report
Sporazum EGP in izvajanje predpisov na področju notranjega trga
EEA Agreement and implementation of internal market rules
Sporazum EGP je učinkovito zagotovil sodelovanje Islandije, Norveške in Lihtenštajna na notranjem trgu.
The EEA agreement has effectively ensured the participation in the internal market by Iceland, Lichtenstein and Norway.
V več kot 15 letih delovanja je bil sporazum EGP ključno gonilo gospodarske rasti v obojestransko korist držav EGP/Efte in držav članic EU.
During its more than 15 years of functioning, the EEA Agreement has been a key driver for economic growth to the mutual benefit of the EEA EFTA countries and the EU MS.
Glede na široko področje uporabe sporazuma EGP poročevalec priznava, da je njegov osnutek poročila omogočil le splošno oceno stanja izvajanja zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga v državah EGP/Efte brez poglobljene študije področij različnih politik.
Given the wide scope of the EEA Agreement, your Rapporteur acknowledges that his draft report enabled only an overall assessment of the state of the implementation of the internal market legislation in the EEA EFTA countries without going in-depth into different policy fields.
Poročevalec meni, da je trenutno stanje izvajanja predpisov na področju notranjega trga v državah EGP/Efte na splošno dobro, kar kaže pregled notranjega trga v državah EGP/Efte v letu 2009.
Your Rapporteur takes the view that the state of play of the implementation of the internal market rules in the EEA EFTA states is overall good, as demonstrated by the EEA EFTA states Internal Market Scoreboard 2009.
Z 0,7 % je povprečni primanjkljaj pri prenosu na Islandiji, v Lihtenštajnu in na Norveškem enak kot v večini držav članic EU.
At 0.7%, the average transposition deficit of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway is the same as most of the EU MS'.
Meni, da je za institucije EU in države članice EGP/Efte pomembna izmenjava najboljših praks pri izvajanju predpisov na področju notranjega trga.
He proposes that it is important for the EU institutions and EEA EFTA MS to engage in exchanging best practices in the implementation of internal market rules.
V zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da je projekt vseevropskih javnih naročil prek spleta (PEPPOL), ki ga usklajuje Norveška in ki naj bi subjektom javnega sektorja v vseh evropskih državah olajšal izvajanje čezmejnega naročanja, primer dobrega sodelovanja in izmenjave najboljših praks v okviru EGP.
In this context, he notes that the Pan European Public Procurement OnLine (PEPPOL) project coordinated by Norway which shall make it easier for public sector entities in all European countries to conduct cross border procurement is an example of good cooperation and exchange of best practices within the EEA framework.
Še en primer uspešnega projekta je izvajanje skupnega nadzora trga in izvrševanja na področju davkov, pristojbin, stroškov in doplačil letalskih družb, ki je bil izveden pod norveškim vodstvom.
Another example of a successful project is the joint market surveillance and enforcement exercise on the Airlines’ Taxes, Fees, Charges, and Surcharges which was carried out under Norway leadership.
Poročevalec meni, da začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe pomeni dva nova izziva za sporazum EGP na institucionalni ravni.
Your Rapporteur considers that the entering into force of the Lisbon Treaty entails two new challenges for the EEA Agreement at the institutional level.
Prvič, ker sporazum EGP temelji na stebrni strukturi EU, ki jo Lizbonska pogodba opušča, se pojavlja negotovost, katera zakonodaja EU velja za EGP.
Firstly, since the EEA agreement is based on the pillar structure of the EU which is abandoned in the Lisbon Treaty, there exists uncertainty as to which EU legislation is EEA relevant.
Ta negotovost bi lahko povzročila počasnejši prenos zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga v državah EGP/Efte.
This uncertainty might lead to a slower implementation of the internal market legislation in the EEA EFTA states.
Poročevalec meni, da bi Evropska komisija morala podati oceno stanja.
Your Rapporteur considers that the European Commission should provide an assessment of the situation.
Drugič, Lizbonska pogodba povečuje vlogo nacionalnih parlamentov v odločanju v EU.
Secondly, the Lisbon Treaty enhances the role of national parliaments in EU decision-making.
Poročevalec meni, da bi podobno tudi parlamenti držav EGP/Efte morali biti bolj vključeni v zakonodajne postopke EU pri predlogih, ki veljajo za EGP.
The Rapporteur considers that, by analogy, parliaments of the EEA EFTA states should be more involved in the EU legislative process as regards to the EEA relevant proposals.
Predlaga, naj Evropska komisija nacionalnim parlamentom držav EGP/Efte z namenom posvetovanja pošilja zakonodajne predloge, ki jih pošilja nacionalnim parlamentom držav članic EU.
He proposes that the European Commission should provide the national parliaments of the EEA EFTA states with legislative proposals which are sent to the national parliaments of the EU MS for consultation.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da v državah EGP/Efte poteka postopek izvajanja direktive o storitvah.
Your Rapporteur notes that the EEA EFTA states are in the process of implementing the Services Directive.
Države EEA/Efte spodbuja, naj namenijo ustrezna sredstva za izvajanje direktive o storitvah in zlasti za vzpostavitev enotnih kontaktnih točk.
He encourages the EEA EFTA states to allocate adequate resources for implementing the Services Directive and for setting up the single points of contact in particular.
Poleg tega države EGP/Efte spodbuja, naj izvajanje direktive o storitvah izkoristijo kot priložnost za razvoj storitev e-uprave.
He furthermore encourages the EEA EFTA states to use the implementation of the Services Directive as an opportunity to develop their e-government services.
Sporazum o prostem pretoku oseb/odnosi med EU in Švico
Free Movement of Persons Agreement/Relations between the EU and Switzerland
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da Švica na svoj način prispeva k razvoju notranjega trga.
Your Rapporteur notes that Switzerland contributes in its own way to development of the Internal Market.
Evropska unija je s Švico sklenila več kot 120 dvostranskih in sektorskih sporazumov, najpomembnejši med njimi pa so sporazum o prosti trgovini, podpisan leta 1972, sedem sporazumov imenovanih „dvostranski sporazumi I“ (prost pretok oseb, kopenski in zračni promet, tehnične ovire v trgovini, javna naročila, raziskave, kmetijstvo), sklenjeni leta 1999, in „dvostranski sporazumi II“, ki so bili sklenjeni leta 2004 (schengenski in dublinski sporazumi, boj proti goljufijam, obdavčenje prihrankov, statistika, predelani kmetijski proizvodi, pokojnine, okolje, programi Media in skupna izjava o nameri glede pridruževanja izobraževalnim programom).
The EU has concluded more than 120 bilateral and sectoral agreements with Switzerland, the most important of which is are the Free Trade Agreement signed in 1972, the 7 agreements of the so-called "Bilaterals I" (free movement of persons, land and air transport, technical barriers to trade, public procurements, research, agriculture) concluded in 1999 and the "Bilaterals II" concluded in 2004 (Schengen-Dublin Treaties, fight against fraud, taxation of savings, statistics, processed agricultural products, pensions, environment, Media and a common declaration of intent regarding the association to the Education Programmes).
Osnutek poročila je osredotočen na delovanje sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb med EU, njenimi državami članicami in Švico, ki je bil sklenjen v okviru „bilateralnih sporazumov I“.
The draft report focuses on the functioning of the Free Movement of Persons Agreement (FMPA) between the EU, it MS and Switzerland which was concluded as part of the "Bilaterals I".
Prvič, poročevalec ugotavlja, da ima sporazum o prostem pretoku oseb pozitivne učinke, o katerih priča stalno povečevanje števila napotenih delavcev in samozaposlenih ponudnikov storitev iz EU, ki delujejo v Švici, med letoma 2005 in 2009, kar prispeva k nadaljnjemu poglabljanju gospodarskih vezi med EU in Švico.
Firstly, your Rapporteur observes that the FMPA has had significant positive effects as witnessed by constant increases in numbers of posted workers and self-employed service providers from the EU operating in Switzerland from 2005 to 2009, contributing thus to a further deepening of economic links between the EU and Switzerland.
Približno 200.000 čezmejnih migrantov iz držav EU ali Efte dnevno hodi na delo v Švico.
There are approximately 200.000 cross-border commuters from EU or EFTA countries, who go to Switzerland every day to work.
Kljub temu pozitivnemu razvoju dogodkov poročevalec meni, da so pri izvajanju sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb še vedno številne težave, ki jih je treba odpraviti.
Notwithstanding these positive developments, your Rapporteur considers that there also exist a number of issues to be addressed as regards to the implementation of the FMPA.
Na težave so opozorili tako ponudniki storitev iz EU kot tudi švicarski organi.
Issues have been raised both by EU’s service providers as well as by the Swiss authorities.
Podjetja iz EU so izpostavila več ovir za izvajanje sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb, zlasti zahtevo, da morajo podjetja iz EU, ki v Švici želijo opravljati storitve, priglasitev poslati osem dni pred začetkom del, in zahtevo po prispevku za stroške delovanja tristranskih komisij.
The EU's businesses have pointed out several obstacles to the implementation of the free movement of persons agreement, including notably the 8-days notification requirement for undertakings from the EU wishing to provide services in Switzerland and a requirement to contribute to enforcement costs of tripartite commissions.
V odziv na te kritike je švicarska vlada izboljšala dostopnost ustreznih informacij za podjetja, zlasti s spletno stranjo z informacijami o plači in delovnih pogojih v Švici.
As a reaction to these criticisms the Swiss government has improved the availability of relevant information for undertakings, notably through a website that provides information on salary and working conditions in Switzerland.
Podjetja pa so poročevalca tudi opozorila na zakonodajo, ki tuja podjetja, ki opravljajo čezmejne storitve, obvezuje k vložitvi jamstva o finančni integriteti.
However, businesses have also drawn attention of the Rapporteur to regulations which oblige foreign enterprises providing cross-border services to place a guarantee of financial probity.
Ti predpisi se zdijo nesorazmerni glede na sporazum o prostem pretoku, saj številna podjetja ne morejo zbrati dovoljšnjega zneska, da bi vstopila na švicarski trg.
Such provisions seem to be disproportionate in light of the FMPA, as a considerable number of enterprises are not in a position to mobilise such an amount to enter the Swiss market.
Poročevalec z obžalovanjem ugotavlja, da nedavna odločitev Švicarskega zveznega sodišča, s katero je bil ta ukrep zavrnjen, izpodbija kanton Basel, ki je proti tej odločitvi vložil pritožbo.
The Rapporteur notes with great regret that the recent decision of the Swiss Federal Tribunal rejecting this measure has been questioned by the canton of Basel, which placed an appeal against it.
Poročevalec tudi v zvezi s tem razume pomisleke in sprašuje, ali so takšni ukrepi sorazmerni.
Again, understanding the misgivings the Rapporteur asks if measures of that sort are proportionate.
Švicarski ponudniki storitev so se med drugim pritožili zaradi zahteve v nemški zakonodaji o napotitvi delavcev za opravljanje dela v Nemčiji, da morajo švicarska gradbena podjetja plačevati prispevke v nemški sklad za dopuste tudi tedaj, ko morajo v sklad za dopuste plačevati že v Švici.
Swiss service providers have complained about, inter alia, the requirement of the German legislation, on the secondment of workers to conduct business in Germany, Swiss construction companies are obliged to contribute to the German leave fund even if they already have to provide paid leave in Switzerland.
Druga težava, ki so jo omenila švicarska podjetja, je povezana z obveznim desetletnim jamstvom za vsako delo, povezano s stavbami v Franciji.
Another issue that has been mentioned by Swiss companies is related to the obligatory ten years guarantee for all works related to buildings in France.
Vsa gradbena podjetja morajo skleniti ustrezno zavarovanje s francosko zavarovalnico.
All constructors must subscribe to a respective insurance with a French insurance company.
Švicarski organi trdijo, da švicarska podjetja zelo težko pridobijo tako zavarovanje.
Swiss authorities claim that it is very difficult for Swiss companies to obtain this insurance.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da je tako obvezno plačevanje prispevkov v nemški sklad za dopuste, kot tudi obvezno desetletno jamstvo, mogoče obravnavati kot oviro svobode opravljanja storitev, vendar pa se zdi, da ukrepa nista diskriminatorna za Švico, saj se enako uporabljata tudi znotraj EU.
Your Rapporteur observes that both the obligation to contribute to the German leave fund as well as the obligatory ten years guarantee might be considered as obstacles to the freedom to provide services, however, they appear to be non-discriminatory as regards to Switzerland since they equally apply within the EU.