natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(26) Z odobritvijo tehnološke nevtralnosti in nevtralnosti storitev bi bilo treba povečati prožnost upravljanja spektra in dostopa do spektra, da bodo lahko uporabniki spektra izbrali najboljše tehnologije in storitve, ki jih bodo uporabljali v frekvenčnih pasovih, ki so na voljo za zagotavljanje elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev v ustreznih nacionalnih načrtih za dodeljevanje frekvenc v skladu s pravom Skupnosti ("načeli tehnološke nevtralnosti in nevtralnosti storitev").
(26) Flexibility in spectrum management and access to spectrum should be increased through technology and service-neutral authorisations to allow spectrum users to choose the best technologies and services to apply in frequency bands declared available for electronic communications services in the relevant national frequency allocation plans in accordance with Community law (the "principles of technology and service neutrality").
Upravna določitev tehnologij in storitev bi se morala uporabljati, ko gre za cilje splošnega interesa, in morala bi biti jasno utemeljena, treba pa bi jo bilo tudi redno pregledovati.
The administrative determination of technologies and services should apply when general interest objectives are at stake and should be clearly justified and subject to regular periodic review.
(27) Omejitve načela tehnološke nevtralnosti bi morale biti ustrezne in utemeljene s potrebo po preprečevanju škodljivega motenja, na primer z uvedbo emisijskih mask in ravni moči, po zagotovitvi varovanja javnega zdravja z omejitvijo izpostavljenosti javnosti elektromagnetnim poljem, pravilnega delovanja storitev z ustrezno ravnjo tehnološke kakovosti storitev, pri čemer ni nujno izključena možnost uporabe več kot ene storitve v istem frekvenčnem pasu, pravilne souporabe spektra, zlasti tam, kjer je njegova uporaba dovoljena samo na podlagi splošnih odobritev, in učinkovite uporabe spektra, ali s potrebo po uresničitvi cilja splošnega interesa v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
(27) Restrictions on the principle of technology neutrality should be appropriate and justified by the need to avoid harmful interference, for example by imposing emission masks and power levels, to ensure the protection of public health by limiting public exposure to electromagnetic fields, to ensure the proper functioning of services through an adequate level of technical quality of service, while not necessarily precluding the possibility of using more than one service in the same frequency band, to ensure proper sharing of spectrum, in particular where its use is only subject to general authorisations, to safeguard efficient use of spectrum, or to fulfil a general interest objective in conformity with Community law.
(28) Uporabnikom spektra bi morali omogočiti tudi svobodno izbiro storitev, ki jih želijo ponuditi prek spektra in za katere veljajo prehodni ukrepi zaradi uskladitve s predhodno pridobljenimi pravicami.
(28) Spectrum users should also be able to freely choose the services they wish to offer over the spectrum subject to transitional measures to cope with previously acquired rights.
Po drugi strani bi morali biti dopuščeni ukrepi , za katere je potrebna zagotovitev posebne storitve, da izpolnijo jasno opredeljene cilje splošnega interesa, kot sta varovanje življenja, potreba po spodbujanju socialne, regionalne in teritorialne kohezije ali preprečevanje neučinkovite uporabe spektra.
On the other hand, measures should be allowed which require the provision of a specific service to meet clearly defined general interest objectives such as safety of life, the need to promote social, regional and territorial cohesion, or the avoidance of the inefficient use of spectrum to be permitted where necessary and proportionate.
Med temi cilji bi morali biti spodbujanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter pluralnosti medijev, kot so jih opredelile države članice v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
Those objectives should include the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism as defined by Member States in conformity with Community law.
Razen kadar je to nujno za varovanje življenja ali izjemoma zaradi izpolnjevanja drugih ciljev splošnega interesa, kakor jih opredelijo države članice v skladu s pravom Skupnosti , odstopanja ne bi smela povzročiti izključne uporabe nekaterih storitev, temveč bi morala dajati prednost, tako da lahko druge storitve ali tehnologije hkrati obstajajo v istem pasu, če je to mogoče.
Except where necessary to protect safety of life or , exceptionally, to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States in accordance with Community law , exceptions should not result in certain services having exclusive use, but should rather grant them priority so that, insofar as possible, other services or technologies may coexist in the same band
(29) Za opredelitev področja uporabe in narave vsakega odstopanja za spodbujanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti in pluralnosti medijev so pristojne države članice.
(29) It lies within the competence of the Member States to define the scope and nature of any exception regarding the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism.
(30) Ker je razporeditev spektra posameznim tehnologijam ali storitvam odstopanje od načel tehnološke nevtralnosti in nevtralnosti storitev ter zmanjšuje svobodo izbire ponujenih storitev ali uporabljenih tehnologij, bi moral biti vsak predlog za tako razporeditev pregleden, poleg tega pa bi se bilo treba o njem javno posvetovati.
(30) As the allocation of spectrum to specific technologies or services is an exception to the principles of technology and service neutrality and reduces the freedom to choose the service provided or technology used, any proposal for such allocation should be transparent and subject to public consultation.
(31) Zaradi prožnosti in učinkovitosti nacionalni regulativni organi lahko uporabnikom spektra dovolijo, da prosto prenašajo ali dajo v zakup svoje pravice uporabe tretjim osebam.
(31) In the interests of flexibility and efficiency, national regulatory authorities may allow spectrum users freely to transfer or lease their usage rights to third parties.
To bi omogočilo tržno ovrednotenje spektra.
This would allow spectrum valuation by the market.
Glede na njihovo pristojnost za zagotovitev učinkovite uporabe spektra bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi ukrepati z namenom, da zagotovijo, da trgovanje ne povzroča izkrivljanja konkurence, kjer je spekter neizkoriščen.
In view of their power to ensure effective use of spectrum, national regulatory authorities should take action so as to ensure that trading does not lead to a distortion of competition where spectrum is left unused.
(32) Za uvedbo tehnološke nevtralnosti in nevtralnosti storitev ter trgovanja z obstoječimi pravicami uporabe spektra bodo morda potrebne prehodne določbe, vključno z ukrepi za zagotovitev poštene konkurence, saj lahko nov sistem nekaterim uporabnikom spektra da pravico, da začnejo konkurirati tistim uporabnikom spektra, ki so pravice do spektra pridobili pod težjimi pogoji.
(32) The introduction of technology and service neutrality and trading for existing spectrum usage rights may require transitional rules, including measures to ensure fair competition, as the new system may entitle certain spectrum users to start competing with spectrum users having acquired their spectrum rights under more burdensome terms and conditions.
Nasprotno pa se v primerih, ko so bile pravice podeljene kot odstopanje od splošnih pravil ali v skladu z merili, ki niso objektivna, pregledna, sorazmerna in nediskriminacijska, in da bi se dosegli cilji splošnega interesa, položaj imetnikov takšnih pravic ne bi smel neupravičeno biti v škodo njihovih novih konkurentov in ne bi smel presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje takih ciljev splošnega interesa ali ciljev splošnega interesa, ki so z njimi povezani.
Conversely, where rights have been granted as a derogation from the general rules or according to criteria other than those which are objective, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory with a view to achieving a general interest objective, the situation of the holders of such rights should not in an unjustified manner be to the detriment of their new competitors beyond what is necessary to achieve such general interest objective or another related general interest objective.
(33) Da bi se spodbudilo delovanje notranjega trga in podprl razvoj čezmejnih storitev, bi bilo treba Komisijo pooblastiti, da sprejme tehnične izvedbene ukrepe na področju oštevilčenja.
(33) In order to promote the functioning of the internal market and to support the development of cross-border services, the Commission should be given the power to adopt technical implementing measures in the field of numbering.
(34) Dovoljenja, izdana podjetjem, ki ponujajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, ki jim omogočajo dostop do javne ali zasebne lastnine, so ključni dejavniki za vzpostavitev elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ali novih omrežnih elementov.
(34) Permits issued to undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services allowing them to gain access to public or private property are essential factors for the establishment of electronic communications networks or new network elements.
Nepotrebna zapletenost in zamude v postopkih podeljevanja pravic do poti lahko zato pomenijo pomembno oviro za razvoj konkurence.
Unnecessary complexity and delay in the procedures for granting rights of way may therefore represent important obstacles to the development of competition.
Zato bi bilo treba poenostaviti način, na katerega pooblaščena podjetja pridobivajo pravice do poti.
Consequently, the acquisition of rights of way by authorised undertakings should be simplified.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti možnost, da usklajujejo pridobivanje pravic do poti in na svojih spletnih straneh omogočiti dostop do ustreznih informacij.
National regulatory authorities should be able to coordinate the acquisition of rights of way, making relevant information accessible on their websites.
(35) Treba je okrepiti pristojnosti držav članic do imetnikov pravic do poti, da bi se na pošten, učinkovit in okoljsko odgovoren način ter neodvisno od obveznosti operaterja s pomembno tržno močjo zagotovila uvedba ali vzpostavitev novega omrežja, ki bo zagotovilo dostop do njegovega elektronskega komunikacijskega omrežja.
(35) It is necessary to strengthen the powers of the Member States as regards holders of rights of way to ensure the entry or roll-out of a new network in a fair, efficient and environmentally responsible way and independently of any obligation on an operator with significant market power to grant access to its electronic communications network.
Izboljšanje souporabe infrastrukture lahko občutno izboljša konkurenčnost podjetij in zniža njihove skupne finančne in okoljske stroške postavitve elektronske komunikacijske infrastrukture, zlasti novih dostopovnih omrežij.
Improving facility sharing can significantly improve competition and lower the overall financial and environmental cost of deploying electronic communications infrastructure for undertakings, particularly of new access networks.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali biti pooblaščeni, da lahko od imetnikov pravic za vgradnjo naprav na javnem ali zasebnem zemljišču, nad ali pod njim, po primerno dolgem javnem posvetovanju, v katerem bi morale imeti vse zainteresirane stranke priložnost izraziti svoje stališče, zahtevajo souporabo naprav ali zemljišč (vključno s fizično kolokacijo), s čimer spodbudijo učinkovito vlaganje v infrastrukturo in podpirajo inovacije.
National regulatory authorities should be empowered to require that the holders of the rights to install facilities on, over or under public or private property share such facilities or property (including physical co-location) in order to encourage efficient investment in infrastructure and the promotion of innovation, after an appropriate period of public consultation, during which all interested parties should be given the opportunity to state their views.
Taka ureditev souporabe ali usklajevanja lahko vključuje pravila za razdelitev stroškov za souporabo zmogljivosti ali zemljišč in zagotovitev, da se tveganje ustrezno porazdeli med zadevna podjetja.
Such sharing or coordination arrangements may include rules for apportioning the costs of the facility or property sharing and should ensure that there is an appropriate reward of risk for the undertakings concerned.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi zlasti lahko odredili souporabo omrežnih elementov in pripadajočih naprav, kot so cevni vodi, kanali, drogovi, vstopni jaški, priključne omarice, antene, stolpi in druge podporne konstrukcije, zgradbe ali vhodi v zgradbe, ter boljše usklajevanje javnih del.
National regulatory authorities should in particular be able to impose the sharing of network elements and associated facilities, such as ducts, conduits, masts, manholes, cabinets, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, buildings or entries into buildings, and a better coordination of civil works.
Pristojni organi, zlasti lokalni organi, bi morali v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi vzpostaviti tudi ustrezne postopke usklajevanja v zvezi z javnimi deli ter drugimi zmogljivostmi ali zemljišči; ti lahko vključujejo postopke, s katerimi se zagotovi, da imajo zainteresirane stranke dostop do informacij o ustreznih javnih zgradbah ali zemljiščih ter javnih delih, ki so v teku oziroma načrtovana, da so pravočasno obveščene o teh delih ter da je souporaba omogočena v največji možni meri.
The competent authorities, particularly local authorities, should also establish appropriate coordination procedures, in cooperation with national regulatory authorities, with respect to public works and other appropriate public facilities or property which may include procedures that ensure that interested parties have information concerning appropriate public facilities or property and on-going and planned public works, that they are notified in a timely manner of such works, and that sharing is facilitated to the maximum extent possible.
(36) Zanesljivo in varno sporočanje informacij po elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežjih je vse bolj pomembno za celotno gospodarstvo in družbo nasploh.
(36) Reliable and secure communication of information over electronic communications networks is increasingly central to the whole economy and society in general.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali zato zagotoviti integriteto in varnost javnih komunikacijskih omrežij.
National regulatory authorities should therefore ensure that the integrity and security of public communications networks are maintained.
Agencija za varnost omrežij in informacij (ENISA)
The European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA)
Uredba (ES) št. 460/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 77, 13.3.2004, str.
Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p.
1). bi morala prispevati k višji ravni varnosti elektronskih komunikacij, med drugim z zagotavljanjem strokovnega znanja in svetovanja ter spodbujanjem izmenjave najboljših praks.
1). should contribute to the enhanced level of security of electronic communications by, among other things, providing expertise and advice, and promoting the exchange of best practices.
ENISA in nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti potrebna sredstva za opravljanje svojih nalog, vključno s pooblastili za pridobivanje zadostnih informacij, da bi lahko ocenili raven varnosti omrežij ali storitev, ter izčrpne in zanesljive podatke o dejanskih z varnostjo povezanih dogodkih, ki so pomembno vplivali na delovanje omrežij ali storitev.
Both ENISA and the national regulatory authorities should have the necessary means to perform their duties, including powers to obtain sufficient information in order to assess the level of security of networks or services as well as comprehensive and reliable data about actual security incidents that have had a significant impact on the operation of networks or services.
Ob upoštevanju, da je ustrezno varnost mogoče uspešno zagotoviti le na podlagi nenehnega procesa izvajanja, pregledov in posodabljanja in ne le enkratnega posega, bi morali ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev sprejeti ukrepe za varovanje integritete in varnosti omrežij v skladu z ocenjenimi tveganji, ob upoštevanju trenutnega stanja na področju razvoja takšnih ukrepov.
Bearing in mind that the successful application of adequate security is not a one-off exercise but a continuous process of implementation, review and updating, the providers of electronic communications networks and services should be required to take measures to safeguard their integrity and security in accordance with the assessed risks, taking into account the state of the art of such measures.
(36a) Države članice bi morale omogočiti ustrezno obdobje za javno posvetovanje pred sprejetjem posebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev, da podjetja, ki nudijo javna komunikacijska omrežja ali javno dostopne elektronske komunikacijske storitve, sprejmejo ustrezne tehnične in organizacijske ukrepe za ustrezno upravljanje tveganja v zvezi z varnostjo omrežij in storitev ali zagotovijo celovitost svojih omrežij.
(36a) Member States should allow for an appropriate period of public consultation before the adoption of specific measures to ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage risk to security of networks and services or to ensure the integrity of their networks.
(37) Če obstaja potreba po dogovoru glede skupnih varnostnih zahtev, bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti pristojnosti za sprejetje tehničnih izvedbenih ukrepov za doseganje ustrezne ravni varnosti elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev na notranjem trgu.
(37) Where there is a need to agree on a common set of security requirements, power should be conferred on the Commission to adopt technical implementing measures to achieve an adequate level of security of electronic communications networks and services in the internal market.
ENISA bi morala prispevati k usklajevanju ustreznih tehničnih in organizacijskih varnostnih ukrepov tako, da Komisiji nudi strokovne nasvete.
ENISA should contribute to the harmonisation of appropriate technical and organisational security measures by providing expert advice.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali biti pooblaščeni za izdajo zavezujočih navodil v zvezi s tehničnimi izvedbenimi ukrepi, sprejetimi v skladu z Okvirno direktivo.
National regulatory authorities should have the power to issue binding instructions relating to technical implementing measures adopted pursuant to the Framework Directive.
Da lahko opravljajo svoje dolžnosti, bi morali biti pooblaščeni za preiskovanje in nalaganje kazni v primerih neskladnosti.
In order to perform their duties, they should have the power to investigate cases of non-compliance and to impose penalties.
(37a) Da se zagotovi, da konkurenca na trgih elektronskih komunikacij ni izkrivljena ali omejena, bi nacionalni regulativni organi morali imeti možnost, da naložijo ukrepe, katerih namen je preprečiti premik znatne tržne moči z enega trga na drugega, ki je s prvim trgom tesno povezan.
(37a) For the purposes of ensuring that there is no distortion or restriction of competition in the electronic communications markets, national regulatory authorities should be able to impose remedies aimed at preventing leverage of significant market power from one market to another, closely related, market.
Jasno bi moralo biti, da bo podjetje, ki ima veliko tržno moč na prvem trgu, imelo veliko tržno moč na drugem trgu le, če so vezi med obema trgoma take, da omogočajo premik tržne moči s prvega na drugi trg, in če je drugi trg dovzeten za ex ante ureditev v skladu z merili iz priporočila o upoštevnih trgih izdelkov in storitev
It should be clear that the undertaking which has significant market power on the first market may be designated as having significant market power on the second market only if the links between the two markets are such as to allow the market power held in the first market to be leveraged into the second market and if the second market is susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with the criteria defined in the Recommendation on relevant product and service markets
Priporočilo Komisije z dne 11. februarja 2003 o upoštevnih trgih proizvodov in storitev v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij, ki so lahko predmet predhodnega urejanja v skladu z Direktivo 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (UL L 114, 8.5.2003, str.
Commission Recommendation of 11 February 2003 on Relevant Product and Service Markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communication networks and services ( OJ L 114, 8.5.2003, p.
(38) Da se akterjem na trgu zagotovi predvidljivost regulativnih pogojev, je treba določiti roke za preglede trga.
(38) In order to provide market players with certainty as to regulatory conditions, a time limit for market reviews is necessary.
Analizo trga je treba izvajati redno ter v razumnem in ustreznem časovnem okviru.
It is important to conduct a market analysis on a regular basis and within a reasonable and appropriate timeframe.
Ta časovni okvir bi moral upoštevati, ali je bil določen trg že predmet analize trga in ustrezno priglašen.
The timeframe should take account of whether the particular market has previously been subject to market analysis and duly notified.
Če nacionalni regulativni organ trga ne uspe analizirati v roku, lahko to ogrozi notranji trg, običajni postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev pa morda ne bodo pravočasno prinesli želenega učinka.
Failure by a national regulatory authority to analyse a market within the time limit may jeopardise the internal market, and normal infringement proceedings may not produce their desired effect on time.
Po drugi strani pa bi moral zadevni nacionalni regulativni organ imeti možnost, da od organa BEREC zahteva pomoč pri dokončni pripravi analize trga.
Alternatively, the national regulatory authority concerned should be able to request the assistance of BEREC to complete the market analysis.
Ta pomoč je na primer lahko tudi v obliki posebne delovne skupine, v kateri so predstavniki drugih nacionalnih regulativnih organov.
For instance, this assistance could take the form of a specific task force composed of representatives of other national regulatory authorities.
(39) Zaradi visoke ravni tehnoloških inovacij in zelo dinamičnih trgov v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij bi morali na ravni Skupnosti ureditev hitro in usklajeno prilagoditi, saj izkušnje kažejo, da bi razlike med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi pri izvajanju regulativnega okvira EU lahko ovirale razvoj notranjega trga.
(39) Due to the high level of technological innovation and highly dynamic markets in the electronic communications sector, there is a need to adapt regulation rapidly in a coordinated and harmonised way at Community level, as experience has shown that divergence among the national regulatory authorities in the implementation of the EU regulatory framework may create a barrier to the development of the internal market.
(40) Ena od pomembnih nalog, dodeljenih organu BEREC , je sprejemanje mnenj o čezmejnih sporih.
(40) One important task assigned to BEREC is to adopt opinions in relation to cross‑border disputes where appropriate.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi zato v takih primerih morali upoštevati morebitna mnenja organa BEREC .
National regulatory authorities should therefore take account of any opinions of BEREC in such cases.