natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Opozarja na možnost, da se z mehanizmom od spodaj navzgor razvijejo inovativne rešitve glede označevanja.
It claims that bottom-up mechanisms of this kind may lead to the development of innovative labelling solutions.
Glede na dejstvo, da večina nosilcev živilske dejavnosti v EU trži svoje izdelke v več državah članicah, bi bilo treba proizvesti specifično embalažo in predvsem zagotoviti ustrezne skladiščne zmogljivosti.
Given the fact that a majority of food enterprises in the EU market their products in far more than one Member State, specific packaging would have to be produced and above all appropriate storage capacity would have to be built up in accordance with the specific rules in force in each country.
Dodatne stroške v višini nekaj milijard evrov bi živilski sektor, v katerem prevladujejo mala in srednje velika podjetja, težko prenesel, in bi bili nenazadnje naloženi potrošnikom.
The additional costs involved, which would run to many billions of euros, would impose a severe burden on the food sector, which consists largely of small- and medium-sized firms, and would ultimately be passed on to consumers.
Navsezadnje pa k absurdnosti te namere pripomore še dejstvo, da bi se morda v prihodnje postopoma uvedlo 27 različnih in dopolnjujočih se sistemov označevanja in povrh vsega še v različnih časovnih obdobjih.
The mere idea that in future a possible 27 additional, different labelling systems would be introduced, and what is more at different junctures, is enough to demonstrate the absurdity of this plan.
Poročevalka zato predvideva črtanje ustreznih členov.
Accordingly, your rapporteur is proposing amendments deleting the articles in question.
Vendar to ne pomeni, da se že obstoječi, prostovoljni sistemi označevanja trgovine ali nekaterih proizvajalcev živil v prihodnje prepovedo.
This does not mean, however, that existing, voluntary labelling systems introduced by the food sector or by groups of food manufacturers will in future be banned.
Nasprotno: poleg obveznih navedb je vsekakor tudi dovoljeno, da se ne glede na obliko prikaza navedbe ponovijo na drugem mestu na embalaži oziroma se dodajo še dodatni podatki.
Quite the reverse: in addition to indicating the mandatory particulars, it should be perfectly possible to repeat particulars elsewhere on the packaging, in whatever form, or to provide additional particulars.
To pa seveda ne sme vplivati na čitljivost obveznih navedb ali otežiti njihovega iskanja.
Of course this should not detract from the visibility and legibility of the mandatory particulars.
Treba je preprečiti zavajanje potrošnikov z obliko embalaže živil.
The legislation must ensure that consumers are not misled by the presentation of food packagings.
Slikovne in/ali besedilne predstavitve ne smejo zavajati glede izvora proizvoda, sestave ali vsebnosti hranilnih snovi v živilu.
Pictorial representations or texts must not mislead the consumer as to the true origin, composition or nutrition content of the food.
Poročevalka zato predlaga ustrezne dopolnitve osnutka predloga Komisije.
Accordingly, your rapporteur is proposing amendments which supplement the provisions of the Commission proposal.
Ker je bila prisotnost cenovno ugodnih imitacij živil, ki jih povprečen potrošnik ne prepozna kot take, nedavno v središču javne razprave, se zdi smiselno, da se ustrezni proizvodi jasno označijo na sprednji strani embalaže.
As public debate has recently focused on the existence of cheap imitation foods, which the average consumer does not recognise as such, it seems worthwhile to label such products clearly on the front of the packaging.
Poročevalka meni, da se ob prepolni prednji strani embalaže, ki bi vsebovala preveč informacij o živilu oziroma hranilni vrednosti, informacije pa bi se nanašale na 100 g ali 100 ml ali obrok ali bi bile celo sestavljene iz več navedb, na primer poleg količine v gramih še delež v odstotku dnevne potrebe določene skupine prebivalstva, te informacije navsezadnje sploh ne bi upoštevale.
In your rapporteur’s view, however, cramming an excessive amount of nutritional information, expressed per 100 g or 100 ml or per portion, or even consisting of several different particulars, for example expressed in grams and as the percentage of the recommended daily intake for a given population group, onto the front of food packages would ultimately result in the information in question being ignored.
Nenazadnje potrošnik pri nakupu nima na izbiro samo enega izdelka, ampak mu je na policah v trgovinah z živili na voljo vrsta proizvodov.
After all, when shopping, consumers are not faced with just one package, but rather with whole rows of packages on supermarket shelves.
Ker dosedanje ugotovitve kažejo, da se večina potrošnikov, ki skrbijo za svojo prehrano, zanima predvsem za energijsko vrednost posameznega živila, bi morala obvezna navedba energijske vrednosti v kcal, ki se zaradi primerljivosti z drugimi proizvodi nanaša na 100 g ali 100 ml, na prednji strani embalaže zadostovati.
Since current findings suggest that the overwhelming majority of those consumers who give thought to their food are mainly interested in the energy content of foods, the mandatory indication of the energy content, in kilocalories per 100 g or 100 ml, in the interests of comparability, on the front of the package should be sufficient.
Informacije o energijski vrednosti hranilnih snovi, ki sestavljajo določen proizvod, pa so razvidne iz obveznih navedb v tabeli hranilnih vrednosti drugje na embalaži.
Consumers can then discover which nutrients account for the energy content of the product by reading the mandatory particulars in the 'nutrition box' elsewhere on the packaging.
Če vsebuje embalaža samo en obrok, morajo biti navedbe o hranilnih snoveh za ta obrok obvezno dodatno navedene.
If a packaging contains only one portion, it should, in addition, be mandatory to indicate the nutrition information for this portion.
Če bi s potrošniškimi raziskavami v prihodnje ugotovili drugačne želje potrošnikov, bi lahko trgovina in/ali industrija dodatno in prostovoljno navedli želene informacije.
Should consumer surveys in future arrive at different findings concerning consumer wishes, the trade and/or industry can, as already outlined, provide additional particulars voluntarily.
V zvezi s tem pa je ponovno treba predpisati določeno referenčno vrednost in njeno jasno razlago potrošnikom, da bi preprečili arbitrarnost pri navajanju dodatnih podatkov.
However, in this case it would again be necessary to lay down fixed reference amounts and to explain them clearly to consumers in order to avoid arbitrariness in the additional information provided.
Živilska obrt, na primer peki, slaščičarji, mesarji, restavracije itd., prodaja predvsem nepredpakirano blago oziroma blago za neposredno prehrano.
Specialist food traders and manufacturers, e.g. bakers, confectioners, butchers, restaurants, etc., mainly offer non-prepacked goods for sale or immediate consumption.
Tovrstni proizvodi praviloma niso standardizirani, zato lahko njihova sestava in prodajna teža nihata, kar pa je pogojeno s proizvodnim postopkom.
As a rule, these products are not standardised, but are subject to variations in composition and weight which are contingent on the production process.
Treba je upoštevati, da ravno živilska obrt zagotavlja ohranjanje in raznolikost regionalnih specialitet v Evropski uniji.
It should also be borne in mind that specialist food traders and manufacturers in particular are guarantors of the survival and diversity of regional specialities in the European Union.
Zato mora zadevna uredba upoštevati te posebne okoliščine.
The regulation under consideration here must take account of these specific circumstances, therefore.
Predlog Komisije predvideva, da so za urejanje označevanja živil v primeru nepredpakiranih proizvodov zadolžene države članice, ki ne določijo samo oblike prikaza navedb, ampak lahko opredelijo tudi izjeme glede obveznih navedb.
The Commission proposal makes the Member States responsible for laying down food labelling rules in respect of non-prepacked products: they would be able to adopt decisions specifying the form of presentation and, where appropriate, lay down derogations from the rules on mandatory particulars.
Če države članice ne določijo izjem ali s tovrstno posebno ureditvijo odlašajo, morajo ponudniki nepakiranega blaga dati na razpolago vse v uredbi določene navedbe.
However, should Member States not lay down derogations or be slow in adopting special rules, suppliers of non-prepacked goods would be required to provide all the particulars stipulated in the regulation.
To pa bi zaradi opisanih posebnosti živilske obrti spet vodilo v pomanjkanje pravne varnosti in bi še zlasti ogrozilo obstoj malih podjetij.
In the light of the special circumstances outlined above, this would in turn undermine legal certainty in the specialist food sector and, in particular, jeopardise the survival of small businesses.
Za mala podjetja je skorajda nemogoče, da bi zagotovila obsežno označbo hranilne vrednosti.
Firms such as these are hardly in a position to provide a comprehensive nutrition declaration.
Zato poročevalka meni, da bi bilo treba nepredpakirano blago v glavnem izvzeti iz te uredbe.
For that reason, your rapporteur takes the view that non-prepacked goods should be largely excluded from the scope of the regulation.
Izjema so informacije o alergenih, ki jih lahko posreduje tudi živilska obrt.
One provision which should apply, however, is that concerning information on allergens, which can also be provided by specialist food traders and manufacturers.
V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da Uredba (ES) št. 1924/2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih že izvzema takšne proizvode, ki se zapakirajo šele ob prodaji.
In that connection, it should be pointed out that products which are packaged only at the time of sale are already excluded from the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods.
Zaradi prilagoditve obravnavani uredbi je treba Uredbo (ES) št. 1924/2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih revidirati.
In order to bring it into line with the present regulation, Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods needs to be revised.
Poročevalka priporoča, da se v celoti črta njen člen 4, ker je bilo medtem ugotovljeno, da tam opisanih profilov hranil ni mogoče znanstveno utemeljiti, temveč da jih Evropska komisija arbitrarno določi.
At the same time, your rapporteur recommends deleting entirely Article 4 of the latter Regulation, as it has become clear in the meantime that the nutrition profiles described there could not be based on scientific findings but only set arbitrarily by the Commission.
Arbitrarnost zakonodaje o živilih pa bi povečala birokracijo, pravno negotovost in neravnovesje v konkurenci ter ogrozila uravnoteženo prehrano evropskega prebivalstva.
Arbitrary legislation on food would mean more red tape, legal uncertainty and distortions of competition, as well as jeopardising the balanced nutrition of the population of Europe.
Podoben učinek pa bi imelo obvezno barvno označevanje živil po „modelu semaforja“, ki ga zdaj uporablja nekaj nosilcev živilske dejavnosti za končne proizvode in polproizvode (tako imenovane „prikladne proizvode“).
A compulsory system of colour coding of food using the 'traffic light' model, which a few food companies are currently using for ready-made and partially ready-made products ('convenience products'), would have similar effects.
Mejne vrednosti za razdelitev med tri barve, tj. rdečo, rumeno in zeleno, se arbitrarno določijo, razpon med posameznimi barvami pa je prevelik.
The limit values for classification using the three traffic light colours, red, amber and green, are set arbitrarily, and the range within any one of these colours is too big.
Ob upoštevanju, da je cilj zadevnega osnutka uredbe usklajeno obvezno označevanje, ki se uporablja za vsa živila in brezalkoholne pijače, se barvno označevanje osnovnih živil zapostavlja, prednost pa daje na primer prej manjvrednim imitacijam živil, kot je živilo z umetnimi namesto naravnimi sestavinami.
As the proposal for a regulation is intended to establish uniform mandatory labelling applicable to all foods and soft drinks, colour coding would discriminate against basic foods and, for example, create a privileged status for imitation foods, which if anything tend to be inferior, and for artificial as opposed to natural ingredients.
S tem bi se povečale možnosti oblikovanja pogojev za nepravilno in pomanjkljivo prehrano velikega dela prebivalstva.
It is very likely that this would be a recipe for a wrong diet and malnutrition among large sections of the population.
Zato niti Komisija niti poročevalka ne priporočata takšne komponente obveznega označevanja živil.
Therefore neither the Commission nor your rapporteur is recommending such a component for mandatory food labelling.
Zadevna uredba mora določiti označevanje živil, veljavno v vsej Evropi, ki bi se razen z nekaj izjemami uporabljala za vse proizvode nosilcev živilske dejavnosti in ne samo za nekatere kategorije živil.
The aim of the regulation under consideration here is to lay down food labelling rules which would be valid throughout the EU and which would apply – with a small number of exceptions - to all food industry products, i.e. not just to specific categories of foods.
Poudariti je treba, da takšna ureditev lahko ustreza samo povprečnemu potrošniku, to pomeni povprečno izobraženemu, obveščenemu in zdravemu potrošniku, z izjemo alergikov na nekatera živila pa ta ureditev ne ustreza posebnim skupinam bolnikov.
It must be emphasised that such rules can only seek to serve the interests of the average consumer, i.e. normally educated, informed and healthy members of the public, but not persons with food allergies or special categories of patients.
Obvezno označevanje živil omogoča, da se polnoletni državljani pri odločitvi za nakup odločajo odgovorno, namensko in ozaveščeno.
Mandatory labelling of foods should help responsible members of the public make well-informed, targeted purchasing decisions.
Vendar tega cilja ni mogoče doseči z zelo zapletenim osnutkom Komisije iz 53 večinoma zelo pomembnih členov in 13 prilog.
However, the highly complex and complicated Commission proposal, comprising 53 articles, most of which are very relevant, and 13 annexes, will not make it possible to achieve this objective.
Predlagani prikaz obveznih navedb spominja bolj na izobraževanje potrošnika kot pa na njegovo obveščanje: Komisija želi z zakonodajo uvesti „zdravo“ prehrano potrošnikov.
The proposed rules governing the indication of mandatory particulars smack of an effort to educate, not inform, consumers: the Commission wants to compel consumers by law to eat 'healthily’.
Osnutek Komisije je tudi vsebinsko pomanjkljiv.
The Commission proposal also displays substantive shortcomings.
Nekatere zahteve temeljijo na domnevah glede želja in potreb potrošnikov, predlagane referenčne vrednosti pa so vprašljive.
A number of requirements are based on assumptions about consumers' wishes and needs, and proposed reference amounts are of dubious quality.
Namen usklajevanja, ki je v interesu evropskega notranjega trga, bi z načrtom, ki dovoli posebna nacionalna pravila, postal absurden.
The aim of harmonising labelling rules in keeping with internal market principles would be rendered absurd by the proposal to allow Member States to adopt special national provisions.
Veliko predlogov Komisije poleg tega ogroža obstoj malih in srednje velikih podjetij.
Moreover, many of the Commission's proposals are liable to jeopardise the survival of SMEs.
Osnutek Komisije s tem nasprotuje „Aktu za mala podjetja“.
In this way, the Commission proposal contravenes the Small Business Act.
Poleg tega je omembe vredno in zaskrbljujoče dejstvo, da je Komisija pripravila osnutek uredbe, ne da bi se posvetovala s stroko.
What is more, the fact that the Commission drew up the proposal for a regulation without consulting outside experts is both remarkable and alarming.
Prav tako bega tudi dejstvo, da je osnutek predlagan v obdobju, ko so sicer na voljo posamične znanstvene raziskave, obsežna študija, ki bo pokrila vse države članice, pa se je šele začela.
It is also mystifying that the proposal should have been submitted at a time when, although the results of piecemeal scientific research are available, a broad-based study covering all the Member States has only just been started.
Poročevalka zato predlaga temeljit pregled smeri, ki jo je predlagala Komisija.
Your rapporteur is therefore proposing a comprehensive revision of the approach suggested by the Commission.
Opozarja, da lahko načrtovano obvezno označevanje živil zaradi pomanjkanja obsežnih znanstvenih ugotovitev o tem, kako informacije o živilih vplivajo na vedenje potrošnikov v 27 državah članicah EU, vključuje le bistvene osnovne informacije.
She points out that, in the absence of comprehensive scientific findings on the impact of food information on consumer behaviour in the 27 EU Member States, the proposed mandatory labelling of foods should only encompass basic information.
Poleg tega lahko zakonodajalec zagotovi čitljiv in razumljiv prikaz obveznih navedb ter prepreči zavajanje potrošnikov.
In addition, the legislator can ensure that the mandatory particulars are provided in a legible and understandable form and that consumers are not misled.
V primeru novih ugotovitev bi se lahko nosilci živilskih dejavnosti na predlog poročevalke hitro odzvala na želje in potrebe potrošnikov z dodatnimi prostovoljnimi informacijami.
Should new findings about consumer wishes and needs be published in the future, food businesses could then respond quickly, in accordance with the proposals made by your rapporteur, by providing additional information voluntarily.
Le ena takšna ureditev zagotavlja zadostno prožnost in lahko ustreza vsem udeležencem.
Only in this way can sufficient flexibility be guaranteed and sufficient account be taken of the interests of all stakeholders.
Na koncu je treba opozoriti, da je označevanje živil le eden izmed številnih vidikov obveščanja potrošnikov glede prehrane.
Finally, it should be pointed out that food labelling is only one of many aspects of nutrition-related information.
Označevanje lahko le dopolni ozaveščanje prebivalstva o razmeroma zdravem načinu življenja, na primer s kampanjami in izobraževalnimi ukrepi v državah članicah, ne more pa ga nadomestiti.
It can supplement, but not replace, efforts to make the public aware of what constitutes a relatively healthy lifestyle, for example by means of campaigns and education measures.
Navsezadnje zakoni v našem družbenem sistemu ne morejo in tudi ne smejo odvzeti državljanom odgovornosti za lastna dejanja oziroma odgovornosti, ki jo imajo starši do svojih otrok.
What is more, in our society laws cannot and must not release members of the public from responsibility for their own actions or release parents from responsibility for their children.
Tokrat Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov že drugič obravnava predlog Komisije o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom.
It is the second time the Committee for Internal Marked and Consumer Protection considers the Commission proposal on Food Information to Consumers.
Pripravljavka mnenja priznava, da je prejšnji odbor vložil veliko dela v mnenje, ki ga je pripravila Bernadette Vergnaud.
The Rapporteur acknowledges the great amount of work the previous Committee put into the Opinion, drafted by Ms. Bernadette Vergnaud.
Odločila se je, da ne bo odprla Pandorine skrinjice in ne bo vložila številnih novih predlogov sprememb.
The Rapporteur has decided not to open up the Pandora's Box by tabling a large quantity of new amendments.
Namesto tega je sklenila, da bo vključila glavni del mnenja, ki je dobil večino glasov v prejšnjem odboru.
Instead the Rapporteur chose to include the main part of the opinion that reached a majority in the previous Committee.
Odločitev je bila sprejeta na podlagi dejstva, da je prejšnji odbor opravil ogromno delo in da je potreben kompromis za oblikovanje trajnostnega označevanja živil v Evropi.
This decision was led by the acknowledgement on the one hand of the great amount of work done by the previous committee and on the other hand of the need to reach compromises in order to attain sustainable food labelling in Europe.
Pripravljavka mnenja ugotavlja, da je bila razprava o označevanju živil pomembno vprašanje med kampanjo za spomladanske za volitve v Evropski parlament.
The Rapporteur recognizes that the debate on food labelling was an important issue during the campaign for the elections of the European Parliament this spring.
Zaradi tega je treba obravnavati nekatere pomisleke v predlogu Komisije.
That is why there is a need to discuss certain concerns contained in the Commission proposal.
Namen tega mnenja je isti kot pri mnenju, ki ga je Bernadette Vergnaud pripravila februarja 2009.
The aim of this Opinion is the same as Ms. Vergnaud Opinion adopted in February 2009.
Potrošniki morajo imeti možnost, da na podlagi informacij izberejo neko živilo.
Consumers need to have the possibility to make a well-informed choice concerning their selection of food.
Ta ozaveščena odločitev bi med drugim pripomogla k reševanju vedno večjih težav glede debelosti v Evropi.
And this well-informed choice should - among other things - assist in solving the increasing problem of obesity in Europe.
Informacije o živilih morajo zato natančno navesti vsebino določenega živila, ki ga potrošnik želi kupiti, obenem pa omogočiti hiter pregled, ali je živilo z vidika zdrave prehrane primerno ali ne.
Food information therefore has to give a thorough introduction to the content of the specific food the consumer is buying as well as give a quick overview of whether the food is suitable or not while making a healthy choice of foods.
Zaradi tega se je pripravljavka mnenja odločila, da bo vključila številne predloge sprememb iz mnenja prejšnjega odbora.
Consequently the Rapporteur has chosen to include many of the amendments from the prior Committee opinion.
Pripravljavka mnenja je kot glavno točko ohranila obvezno vsebino v označbi hranilne vrednosti, kot je priporočil prejšnji odbor.
As a main point the Rapporteur has chosen to keep the mandatory content in the nutrient declaration as the previous Committee recommended.
Vključila je osem pomembnih hranilnih snovi (vse so navedene na 100 g ali 100 ml), ki morajo biti v istem vidnem polju na embalaži.
The Rapporteur has included the big 8 nutrients - all of them indicated by 100 g or 100 ml - to be present in the same field of vision on the package.
Ni pa nujno, da so navedene v glavnem vidnem polju na sprednji strani embalaže.
The presentation does not have to be in the main field of vision or in the front of pack.
Pripravljavka mnenja predlaga, da bi na sprednji strani embalaže omogočili hiter pregled.
The Rapporteur suggests that the front of pack should be used to give a quick overview.
Zaradi tega meni, da bi bilo energijsko vrednost (kalorično vrednost) primerno navesti na sprednji strani embalaže.
That is why the Rapporteur proposes that the energy value (calorific value) should be on the front of pack.
Ta podatek bi dopolnili z barvno kodo, iz katere bi bilo razvidno, ali je energijska vrednost živila velika, srednja ali majhna.
This information should be supplemented by a colour code which would indicate whether the food has a high, medium, or low value in energy.
Drugi dodatek je povezan s predlogom pripravljavke mnenja, da bi morale biti označene vse vrste alkohola.
Another addition regards the Rapporteur suggestion that all types of alcohol should be labelled.
Alkohol vsebuje veliko kalorij, ki lahko izrazito vplivajo na dnevno porabo energije.
Alcohol contains large amounts of calories which can have a huge influence on the daily consumption of energy.
Pripravljavka mnenja ugotavlja, da bi morali imeti potrošniki te informacije na voljo v istem času, ko analizirajo podatke o živilu.
The Rapporteur states that the consumer should have this information at the same time as he or she analyzes the food information.