natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Posledično bodo potrebne nujne in bistvene mehanske spremembe traktorjev, da bo vanje mogoče vgraditi nove motorje.
Tractors too will therefore require substantial mechanical modifications in order to accommodate the new engines.
Tehnološke rešitve, ki omogočajo spoštovanje omejitev na tej stopnji še niso dokončne, zanje pa bodo potrebna nadaljnja in pomembna prizadevanja na področju raziskav;
The technological solutions which will make it possible to comply with the limits imposed during the current stage are not yet final and require further significant research efforts.
Po informacijah panožnega združenja (Evropski odbor združenj proizvajalcev kmetijskih strojev – CEMA) se je promet v letu 2009 znižal za 20–25 % v primerjavi z letom 2008, medtem ko podatki za prvo trimesečje leta 2010 kažejo 22-odstotni upad glede na leto 2009.
According to the organisation representing the industry (CEMA), turnover decreased by 20-25% between 2008 and 2009, while figures for the 1st quarter of 2010 show a fall of 22% compared to 2009.
Direktiva ne bo vplivala na proračun, pravna podlaga zanjo pa je, ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti, člen 114 Pogodbe.
The Directive will not have any budgetary impact and, with due regard for the subsidiarity principle, is based on Article 114 of the Treaty.
Predlog direktive Komisije je brez dvoma treba sprejeti.
The Directive proposed by the Commission is certainly to be welcomed.
Je v skladu s cilji okoljskega varstva, ki si jih je že pred časom zastavila EU.
It respects the environmental protection objectives adopted some time ago by the EU.
Glede na hudo gospodarsko krizo bi lahko predlagala korenitejše spremembe, na primer moratorij na direktivo, začasno spremembo stopenj ali višji odstotek prožnosti.
In view of the serious economic crisis, the Commission might have made more radical proposals, such as a moratorium on the Directive, a change in the timing of the stages or an even higher percentage of flexibility.
Vendar se je Komisija odločila uvesti preprost, učinkovit in pravočasen ukrep, ki bo omogočil:
However, the Commission has opted to introduce a measure which is simple, effective and timely and which will make it possible:
(a) proizvajalcem v EU, da prodajajo traktorje, prebrodijo sedanje čase gospodarske krize, poiščejo nove vire za raziskave in upoštevajo omejitve evropske zakonodaje za varstvo okolja;
(a) for manufacturers in the EU to sell tractors, overcome the current difficult economic crisis, find new resources for research and comply with the limits laid down by European law for environmental protection purposes;
(b) kmetom, da bodo zamenjali starejše traktorje z novimi, ki bodo opremljeni z manj onesnažujočimi motorji.
(b) for farmers to replace their oldest tractors with new ones whose engines will be less polluting.
Če predlagana sprememba ne bo sprejeta, bomo, protislovno, dosegli nasproten rezultat od zastavljenega.
If the proposed amendment were not adopted, we would paradoxically end up with a result opposite to that which we all seek to bring about.
Dejansko bi mnogi kmetje, soočeni z možnostma, ali ohraniti starejše, bolj onesnažujoče traktorje ali pa kupiti nove, mnogo dražje, ki delujejo po tehnologiji, ki je še negotova ali pomanjkljiva, utegnili izbrati prvo možnost, še posebej če upoštevamo še sedanje gospodarske težave, in tako poslabšati evropsko okolje, namesto da bi ga izboljšali.
Many farmers, faced with a choice between keeping old tractors which are more highly polluting and buying new ones which are considerably more expensive and based on technology which is still uncertain and precarious, might prefer the first option, particularly bearing in mind the current economic difficulties, and this would damage, rather than improve, Europe’s environment.
Po oceni Skupnega raziskovalnega centra za Komisijo bi ocenjeni učinek tako spremenjenega sistema prožnosti znesel le 0,3 % skupnih emisij vse necestne mobilne mehanizacije.
According to an assessment by the JRC for the Commission, the estimated impact of the flexibility scheme as modified by this proposal would amount to only 0.3% of total emissions from all non-road mobile machinery in use in the first year.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2000/25/ES glede določb za traktorje, dane na trg v okviru sistema prožnosti
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/25/EC as regards the provisions for tractors placed on the market under the flexibility scheme
Direktiva 2000/25/ES ureja najvišje dovoljene emisije izpušnih plinov ogljikovega oksida (CO), ogljikovodikov (HC), dušikovih oksidov (NOx) in trdnih delcev (PM) iz dizelskih motorjev, vgrajenih v kmetijske in gozdarske traktorje, in je v celoti skladna z Direktivo 97/68/ES o emisijah v necestni mobilni mehanizaciji.
Directive 2000/25/EC regulates the maximum exhaust emissions of carbon oxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) from diesel engines installed in agricultural and forestry tractors and is in fully line with Directive 97/68/EC on emmissions of non-road mobile machinery.
Te veljavne mejne vrednosti (stopnje III A) se od 1. januarja 2011 postopoma nadomeščajo s strožjimi mejnimi vrednostmi stopnje III B.
Currently valid limits (Stage III A) are being replaced by the more stringent Stage III B limits progressively as of 1 st January 2011.
Direktiva 2005/13/ES je uvedla tako imenovani sistem prožnosti za olajševanje prehoda med različnimi stopnjami emisij.
Directive 2005/13/EC introduced the so-called flexibility scheme to facilitate the transition between the different emission stages.
Sistem prožnosti proizvajalcem traktorjev dovoljuje, da v obdobju med dvema zaporednima stopnjama mejnih vrednosti emisij izpušnih plinov dajo na trg omejeno število traktorjev, v katere so vgrajeni motorji, ki so skladni le z mejnimi vrednostmi emisij prejšnje stopnje.
The flexibility scheme allows the tractor manufacturers to place on the market, during the period between two successive stages of exhaust emissions limit values, a limited number of tractors fitted with engines that still comply with the exhaust emission limits of the previous stage.
Proizvajalci traktorjev imajo pravico, da dajo na trg (1) za vsako kategorijo moči motorja omejeno število traktorjev, ki ne presega 20 % letne prodaje mehanizacije proizvajalca ali (2) vnaprej določeno število traktorjev.
A tractor manufacturer is entitled to place on the market either (1) for each engine power category a limited number of tractors not exceeding 20% of the manufacturer's annual sales or (2) a fixed number of tractors.
Druga možnost je namenjena manjšim podjetjem, ki proizvajajo manjše količine motorjev.
This second option is intended to be used by smaller enterprises producing lower volumes of tractors.
Ekonomski vidiki
Economic aspects
Podobno kot proizvajalci necestne mobilne mehanizacije se tudi proizvajalci traktorjev spopadajo z izzivom, da mora naslednja generacija motorjev doseči zmanjšanje emisij PM in NOx , ki bo primerljivo z zahtevanim in uveljavljenim zmanjšanjem pri cestnih motorjih in vozilih (tovornjaki, avtobusi itd.).
In analogy with the situation for non-road mobile machinery manufacturers, the technological challenge for tractor manufacturers is that the next generation of engines must achieve emission reductions in PM and NOx comparable to those required and deployed in on-road engines and vehicles (trucks, buses etc.).
V EU deluje približno 40 proizvajalcev traktorjev, ki proizvajajo številne tipe teh vozil, ki morajo biti v skladu z omejitvami emisij, določenimi v tej direktivi, medtem ko motorje proizvaja samo nekaj velikih družb (približno 10 proizvajalcev v EU in 20 družb po vsem svetu).
There are approximately 40 tractor manufacturers in the EU producing a wide variety of tractors that have to comply with the emission limits laid down in the Directive, while the engines are produced by only a few large companies (approximately 10 manufacturers in the EU and 20 companies worldwide).
Vozila lahko prilagodijo samo proizvajalci traktorjev po zaključku konfiguracije motorja, saj tega postopka preoblikovanja ni mogoče opraviti vzporedno (razen če proizvajalci traktorjev sami proizvajajo motorje).
The adaptation of the vehicles can only be done by the tractor manufacturers after the finalisation of the configuration of the engine, since this redesigning procedure cannot be done in parallel (except for tractor manufacturers producing their own engines).
Na svetovni ravni imajo le Evropska unija, Združene države Amerike, Kanada in v manjšem obsegu Japonska podobne cilje v zvezi z zakonodajo o emisijah motorjev v sektorju necestne mobilne mehanizacije in traktorjev.
World-wide, only the EU, the U.S., Canada and to a lesser degree Japan have similar ambitions with regard to engine emission legislation for the non-road mobile machinery sector and tractors.
Na drugih pomembnih območjih, kot so Kitajska, Indija, Rusija ali Latinska Amerika, teh ciljev bodisi ni bodisi zaostajajo za več stopenj.
In other important geographical areas like China, India, Russia or Latin-America these requirements do not exist or are lagging stages behind.
Glavni geografski trg je čezatlantski trg, kjer delujejo glavni proizvajalci motorjev in traktorjev in kjer so tudi glavni kupci.
The main geographical market is the transatlantic market hosting the key manufacturers of engines and tractors, but also the main customers.
Glede na oceno učinka Komisije znašajo emisije PM10 v sektorju necestne mobilne mehanizacije za EU27 predvidoma 7 % v primerjavi s 13 % v cestnem prometu.
According to the Commission's impact assessment the estimated PM10 emissions from the non-road mobile machinery (NRMM) sector for EU27 are 7% compared to 13% for road transport.
Leta 2005 je prispevek traktorjev k celotnim emisijam PM necestne mobilne mehanizacije znašal 43 % ali 57 kt na leto za EU-15.
In 2005, the contribution of tractors to all NRMM PM emissions was 43% or 57 kt per year for EU15.
Leta 2005 je prispevek traktorjev v celotnih emisijah NOx necestne mobilne mehanizacije znašal 36 % ali 539 kt na leto za EU-15.
In 2005, the contribution of tractors to all NRMM NOx emissions was 36% or 539 kt per year for EU15.
Po mnenju Komisije znaša ocenjeni vpliv razširjene sheme prilagodljivosti (50 % v primerjavi s trenutno stopnjo 20 %) 0,3 % vseh emisij (PM in NOx) vse delujoče necestne mobilne mehanizacije prvem letu.
According to the Commission the estimated impact of an enlarged flexibility scheme (50% compared to currently 20) is 0,3% of the overall emissions (both of PM and NOx) of all NRMM in use, in the first year.
Komisija zato predlaga:
The Commission therefore propose:
1) povečanje odstotka števila motorjev, danih na trg v okviru sistema prožnosti v vsaki kategoriji motorjev, z 20 % na 50 % letne prodaje opreme proizvajalca traktorjev, ali
1) An increase of the percentage of the number of engines placed on the market under the flexibility scheme in each engine category from 20% to 50% of the tractor manufacturer's annual sales of equipment, or
2) kot alternativno možnost, prilagoditev največjega števila motorjev, ki se lahko dajo na trg v okviru sistema prožnosti;
2) as an optional alternative, an adaptation of the maximum number of engines that may be placed on the market under the flexibility scheme.
3) ti ukrepi naj prenehajo veljati 31. decembra 2013.
3) These measures will expire on 31 December 2013.
Stališče pripravljavke mnenja
Rapporteur's point of view
Pripravljavka mnenja meni, da je treba skrbeti tako za razvoj in konkurenčnost industrije na eni strani kot tudi za varstvo okolja na drugi strani, s ciljem zavarovati gospodarski razvoj industrije in traktorjev, ter obenem čim bolj omejiti negativne vplive na okolje, ki so posledica poznejše nadomestitve določenega števila motorjev, ki še niso v skladu z novimi strožjimi omejitvami emisij.
The Rapporteur considers that it is necessary to safeguard both development and competiteveness of the industry on the one side and environmental protection on the other side, aiming at safeguarding economic development of the tractors industry and, at the same time, limiting as much as possible negative environmental impacts stemming from a later replacement of a defined number of existing engines that do not yet comply with the new more stricter emission limit.
Nenavadno je, da je bila skupina proizvajalcev traktorjev izvzeta iz predloga spremembe Direktive 97/68/ES o emisijah necestne mobilne mehanizacije in se obravnava posebej, saj je po mnenju Komisije predlagana rešitev za traktorje popolnoma v skladu z Direktivo 97/68/ES.
It is questionable, why the group of tractor producers was taken out from the proposal amending Directive 97/68/EC on emissions of non-road mobile machinery and is dealt with separately when the solution proposed for the tractors is, according to the Commission, fully in line with Directive 97/68/EC.
Pripravljavka mnenja bi rada prosila za več informacij, ki bodo temeljile na študijah, opravljenih posebej za proizvajalce traktorjev, namesto da se zanaša zgolj na podatke, ki temeljijo na oceni, opravljeni za celotni sektor necestne mobilne mehanizacije, in bi bila zelo hvaležna, če bi imela na voljo več raziskav in delovnih študij neodvisnih strokovnjakov, da bi lahko podrobno ocenila kratkoročne in predvsem dolgoročne vplive predlogov sprememb.
The Rapporteur would like to ask for more information based on studies carried out separately for tractors producers, rather than relying solely on data based on assessment carried out for the non-road mobile machinery sector as a whole, and would appreciate more third-party researches and working studies in order to be able to asses in detail both, short-term and especially long-term impacts of the proposes changes.
Hkrati pa bi želela opomniti, da je Komisija zaradi zamud pri pripravljalnih delih svoj predlog predstavila v času, ko se postopoma uvajajo nove in strožje omejitve emisij.
At the same time, the Rapporteur would like to recall that due to delays in the preparatory works, the Commission presented its Proposal in a period, when the new, more stringent emissions limits, are being progressively introduced.
S tem se nekako zmanjšuje pomen predloga.
This somehow decreases relevance of the proposal.
Zato meni, da bi se morali posvetiti celovitejšemu pregledu Direktive 97/68/ES, ki bi ga morala v tem letu predložiti Komisija.
Therefore, the Rapporteur believes that we should draw our attention on a more comprehensive review of Directive 97/68/EC which should be presented by the Commission later this year.
Pripravljavka mnenja izrecno priznava, da so te določbe o prožnosti potrebne za male in srednje proizvajalce, da bi zmanjšali stroške njihovega usklajevanja z novimi standardi.
At the same time, the Rapporteur specifically acknowledges the need of such flexibility provisions for small and medium size manufacturers in order to reduce the compliance costs with new standards.
Obstajajo pa tudi proizvajalci, ki so že vložili v raziskave in razvoj, tako da ta predlog ne bi smel zmanjšati njihove konkurenčnosti na trgu.
On the other hand there are also producers that already made investments in research and development and the Proposal should not decrease their competitivness at the market.
(4) Člen 4(8) Direktive 2000/25/ES od leta 2005 predvideva oceno možne potrebe po dodatni prožnosti v zvezi z mejnimi vrednostmi stopenj III B in IV.
(4) Since 2005, Directive 2000/25/EC foresees in Article 4(8) the evaluation of the possible need for additional flexibilities in relation to Stage III B and IV limit values.
Za začasno razbremenitev industrije pri prehodu na naslednjo stopnjo je treba prilagoditi pogoje za uporabo sistema prožnosti.
In order to provide a temporary relief to industry when moving to the next stage, it is necessary to adapt the conditions for applying the flexibility scheme.
Za začasno razbremenitev malih in srednjih podjetij v industriji in kmetijstvu, na katere te spremembe vplivajo, je treba pri prehodu na naslednjo stopnjo prilagoditi pogoje za uporabo sistema prožnosti
In order to provide a temporary relief to small and medium-sized undertakings in the industrial and agricultural sectors which are affected by these changes when moving to the next stage, it is necessary to adapt the conditions for applying the flexibility scheme.
Priloga IV – oddelek 1 – odstavek 1.4
Annex IV – section 1 – point 1.4.
Priloga IV – oddelek 1 – odstavek 1.5
Annex IV – section 1 – point 1.5.
Philip Bradbourn, Spiros Danelis (Spyros Danellis), Isabelle Durant, Tanja Fajon, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Dominique Riquet, Alfreds Rubiks, Sabine Wils, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Philip Bradbourn, Spyros Danellis, Isabelle Durant, Tanja Fajon, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Dominique Riquet, Alfreds Rubiks, Sabine Wils, Corien Wortmann-Kool
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Julie Girling, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Linda McAvan, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Gilles Pargneaux, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Sirpa Pietikäinen, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Bogusław Sonik, Salvatore Tatarella, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Julie Girling, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Linda McAvan, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Gilles Pargneaux, Antonyia Parvanova, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Theodoros Skylakakis, Bogusław Sonik, Salvatore Tatarella, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
Jutta Haug, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bill Newton Dunn, Bart Staes, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Thomas Ulmer, Marita Ulvskog, Anna Záborská
Jutta Haug, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bill Newton Dunn, Bart Staes, Eleni Theocharous, Thomas Ulmer, Marita Ulvskog, Anna Záborská
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zavornih napravah kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev na kolesih (kodificirano besedilo)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on braking devices of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (codified text)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0729 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0729 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7‑0421/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0421/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7‑0092/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0092/2011 ),
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zavornih napravah kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev na kolesih (kodificirano besedilo)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on braking devices of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (codified text)
KOM(2010)0729 z dne 10.12.2010 – 2010/0349(COD)
COM(2010)0729 of 10.12.2010 – 2010/0349(COD)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, še zlasti z odstavkom 4, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala dne 16. decembra 2010, da bi proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 16 December 2010 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo 22 jezikovnih različic predloga in je delala na podlagi angleške različice, ki je izvirna jezikovna različica obravnavanega besedila. predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kodifikaciji Direktive Sveta 76/432/EGS z dne 6. aprila 1976 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavornih napravah kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev na kolesih, soglasno ugotovila, da predlog vsebuje le kodifikacijo obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal 22 language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council codifying Council Directive 76/432/EEC of 6 April 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the braking devices of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s concluding, without dissent, that the proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts, without any change in their substance.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dovoljeni ravni hrupa in izpušnem sistemu motornih vozil (kodificirano besedilo)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the permissible sound level and the exhaust system of motor vehicles (codified text)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0508 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0508 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7‑0288/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0288/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7‑0093/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0093/2011 ),
V Bruslju, 15. novembra 2011
Brussels, 15 November 2011
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dovoljeni ravni hrupa in izpušnem sistemu motornih vozil (kodificirano besedilo)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the permissible sound level and the exhaust system of motor vehicles (codified text)
KOM(2010)0508 z dne 27.9.2010 – 2010/0261(COD)
COM(2010)508 of 27.9.2010 – 2010/0261(COD)