natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj .................................................................65
OPINION Committee on Regional Development ................................................64
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ...................................70
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...70
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ................................................74
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ................................74
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...............................79
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ...79
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU..................................................................84
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................84
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti njenega člena 312,
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular Article 312 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. marca 2007 o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev Evropske unije,
– having regard to its resolution of 29 March 2007 on the future of the European Union’s own resources
17. in njegovih izvedbenih pravil,
17. and its implementing rules,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o pregledu proračuna EU ( KOM(2010)0700 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission on the EU Budget Review ( COM(2010)0700 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega sklepa z dne 16. junija 2010 o ustanovitvi posebnega odbora za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013
– having regard to its decision of 16 June 2010 setting up a special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0225 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0225 . ,
– ob upoštevanju prispevkov iz avstrijskega parlamenta ( Nationalrat ), češke parlamentarne zbornice, danskega parlamenta ( Folkentinget ), estonskega parlamenta ( Riigikogu ), nemškega zveznega parlamenta ( Deutscher Bundestag ), nemškega zveznega sveta ( Deutscher Bundesrat ), irskega parlamenta ( Oireachtas ), litvanskega parlamenta ( Seimas ), latvijskega parlamenta ( Saeima ), portugalskega parlamenta ( Assembleia da República ) nizozemskega spodnjega doma ( Tweede Kamer ) in švedskega parlamenta ( Riksdagen ),
– having regard to the contributions from the Austrian Nationalrat , the Czech Chamber, the Danish Folkentinget , the Estonian Riigikogu , the Deutscher Bundestag , the Deutscher Bundesrat , the Irish Oireachtas , the Lithuanian Seimas , the Latvian Saeima , the Portuguese Assembleia da República , the Dutch Tweede Kamer , and the Swedish Riksdagen ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 184 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 184 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Posebnega odbora za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013 ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za promet in turizem, Odbora za regionalni razvoj, Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ter Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov( A7-0193/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Special committee on the Policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Transport and Tourism, the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, the Committee on Culture and Education and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ( A7-0193/2011 ),
A. ker se je Parlament odločil, da ustanovi posebni odbor z naslednjimi pooblastili:
A. whereas the Parliament decided to set up a special committee with the following mandate:
(a) opredeliti politične prednostne naloge Parlamenta za večletni finančni okvir po letu 2013 z zakonodajnega in proračunskega vidika,
(a) to define the Parliament’s political priorities for the post-2013 MFF both in legislative and budgetary terms,
(b) oceniti finančna sredstva, ki jih Unija potrebuje za dosego svojih ciljev in izvedbo politik v obdobju, ki se začne s 1. januarjem 2014,
(b) to estimate the financial resources necessary for the Union to attain its objectives and carry out its policies for the period starting 1 January 2014,
(c) določiti trajanje naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira,
(c) to define the duration of the next MFF,
(d) predlagati strukturo prihodnjega večletnega finančnega okvira v skladu s temi prednostnimi nalogami in cilji, ki bo izkazoval glavna področja dejavnosti Unije,
(d) to propose, in accordance with those priorities and objectives, a structure for the future MFF, indicating the main areas of Union activity,
(e) pripraviti smernice za okvirno razporeditev sredstev med različne razdelke odhodkov večletnega finančnega okvira in znotraj njih v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami in predlagano strukturo;
(e) to submit guidelines for an indicative allocation of resources between and within the different headings of expenditure of the MFF in line with the priorities and proposed structure,
(f) opredeliti povezavo med reformo sistema financiranja proračuna EU in pregledom odhodkov, ki bo Odboru za proračun zagotovila dobro podlago za pogajanja o novem večletnem finančnem okviru;
(f) to specify the link between a reform of the financing system of the EU budget and a review of expenditure to provide the Committee on Budgets with a sound basis for negotiations on the new MFF,
B. ker bi posebni odbor moral svoje končno poročilo predstaviti preden Komisija predloži svoje predloge za naslednji večletni finančni okvir,
B. whereas the special committee should present its final report before the Commission submits its proposals on the next MFF,
C. ker začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe krepi politike Unije in ustvarja nova področja pristojnosti, kar bi se moralo odražati v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru,
C. whereas the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon strengthens Union policies and creates new fields of competence which should have a reflection in the next MFF,
D. ker izzivi, s katerimi se soočajo Unija in njeni državljani, kot so na primer svetovna gospodarska kriza, hitra rast gospodarstev v vzponu, prehod v trajnostno družbo in gospodarstvo, ki učinkovito izkorišča vire, spopadanje s podnebnimi spremembami, demografski izzivi, vključno z vključevanjem priseljencev in zaščito prosilcev za azil, sprememba globalne porazdelitve proizvodnje in prihrankov h gospodarstvom v vzponu, boj proti revščini ter grožnje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek, terorizma in organiziranega kriminala, zahtevajo odločen odziv Unije in njenih držav članic,
D. whereas the challenges faced by the Union and its citizens, such as the global economic crisis, the rapid rise of emerging economies, the transition to a sustainable society and resource efficient economy, tackling climate change, demographic challenges, including the integration of immigrants and the protection of asylum seekers, the shift in the global distribution of production and savings to emerging economies, the fight against poverty, as well as the threats of natural and man-made disasters, terrorism and organised crime, require a strong response from the Union and its Member States,
E. ker ima EU na mednarodni ravni večjo težo kot vse države članice skupaj, če bi nastopale posamezno,
E. whereas the European Union carries more weight at international level than the sum of its individual Member States,
F. ker mora biti glavni cilj kohezijske politike EU zmanjšanje še vedno prisotnih socialnih, gospodarskih in ozemeljskih razlik v Uniji, in ker ima prepoznavna in uspešna kohezijska politika že sama po sebi evropsko dodano vrednost in bi morala koristiti vsem državam članicam EU,
F. whereas the main target of EU cohesion policy should continue being the reduction of still existing social, economic, and territorial disparities across the Union, and whereas a visible and successful cohesion policy has a European Added Value by itself and should benefit all EU Member States,
G. ker državljani EU od Unije zahtevajo več in ker so bolj kritični do njenega delovanja ter ker se bo javnost z Unijo ponovno poistovetila šele, ko bodo njeni državljani prepričani, da Unija bolje streže njihovim vrednotam in interesom,
G. whereas EU citizens have become more demanding of the Union and also more critical of its performance; and whereas public ownership of the Union will only return when its citizens are confident that their values and interests are better served by the Union,
H. ker bi strategija Evropa 2020 z ustvarjanjem delovnih mest ter pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rastjo Evropi morala pomagati, da iz krize izide močnejša; ker ta strategija temelji na petih krovnih ciljih Unije glede spodbujanja zaposlovanja, izboljšanja pogojev za inovacije, raziskave in razvoj, doseganja ciljev na področju podnebnih sprememb in energije, izboljšanja ravni izobrazbe ter spodbujanje socialne vključenosti, zlasti z zmanjševanjem revščine,
H. whereas the Europe 2020 strategy should help Europe recover from the crisis and emerge stronger, through job creation and smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; whereas this strategy is based on five Union headline targets on promoting employment, improving the conditions for innovation, research and development, meeting climate change and energy objectives, improving education levels and promoting social inclusion, in particular through the reduction of poverty,
I. ker je proračun Unije močno sredstvo za reformo, in ker se njegov vpliv lahko poveča, če pritegne dodatne vire zasebnega in javnega financiranja za podporo vlaganj in tako deluje kot katalizator za multipliciranje porabe Unije; ker t.i. načelo „pravičnega povračila“ (juste retour) ni ekonomsko utemeljeno, saj ne upošteva evropske dodane vrednosti, učinkov prelivanja in potrebe po solidarnosti med državami EU,
I. whereas the Union budget is a powerful agent for reform; and whereas its impact can be magnified if it mobilises additional sources of private and public finance to support investment, acting thus as a catalyst in the multiplying effect of Union spending; whereas the so-called ‘just retour’ principle has no economic rationale, since it does not take due account of European Added Value, spill-over effects and the need for solidarity between EU countries,
J. ker v skladu s členom 3 Pogodbe o EU trajnostni razvoj Evrope temelji na uravnoteženi gospodarski rasti in stabilnosti cen, izjemno konkurenčnem socialnem tržnem gospodarstvu, katerega cilj sta polna zaposlenost in socialni napredek, ter visoki ravni varstva okolja in izboljšanju njegove kakovosti,
J. whereas, according to Article 3 TEU, sustainable development of Europe should be based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment,
K. ker je načelo dobrega finančnega upravljanja eno temeljnih načel za izvajanje proračuna Unije, ker številne države članice v nacionalnih proračunih izvajajo zahtevne fiskalne prilagoditve, in ker je dobro finančno upravljanje – učinkovito, uspešno in ekonomično – vse pomembnejše na področju javne porabe tako na ravni Unije kot tudi na ravni držav članic,
K. whereas the principle of sound financial management is one of the basic principles for the implementation of the Union budget; and whereas many Member States are making difficult fiscal adjustments to their national budgets; and whereas sound financial management -efficiency, effectiveness, economy- have become increasingly important in public spending, both at Union and Member State levels,
L. ker so se predpisi za periodično prilagajanje programov odhodkov spremembam potreb in okoliščin izkazali za nezadostne in ker je zapletena narava predpisov in pravil eden od razlogov za nezadostno uspešnost sistemov upravljanja in nadzora,
L. whereas the provisions for the periodic adjustment of expenditure programmes to changing needs and circumstances have been insufficient; and whereas the complex nature of regulations and rules has been one of the reasons for underperforming management and control systems,
M. ker so prva štiri leta obstoječega večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013 jasno pokazala meje zmogljivosti finančnega okvira pri odzivanju na nova dogajanja in nove prednostne naloge brez ogrožanja obstoječih; ker se obstoječi večletni finančni okvir ni bil sposoben hitro odzvati na nove zaveze, kot so Galileo, mednarodni termonuklearni poskusni reaktor, instrument za hrano ali evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva,
M. whereas the first four years of the current 2007-2013 MFF have clearly illustrated the limits of the capacity of the financial framework to accommodate new developments and priorities without jeopardising existing ones; and whereas the current MFF has been incapable of responding rapidly to new commitments such as Galileo, ITER, the Food Facility or the European Economic Recovery Plan,
N. ker naj bi uvedba vira na podlagi BND v sistem financiranja EU leta 1988 le začasno dopolnila nižja lastna sredstva, vendar je bila njegova uporaba podaljšana in z leti še okrepljena, tako da je danes glavna sestavina proračunskih virov EU; ker je ta prevlada okrepila težnjo držav članic, da izračunavajo svojo neto bilanco, posledica tega pa so številni rabati, popravki, izvzetja in kompenzacije, zaradi česar je trenutni sistem lastnih sredstev pretirano zapleten, nepregleden, nezadostno povezan z obstoječimi politikami Unije ter nepravičen, zato ni sposoben zagotoviti preglednega in učinkovitega financiranja politik EU v evropskem interesu, poleg tega pa je povsem nerazumljiv evropskim državljanom,
N. whereas the introduction of the GNI resource in 1988 in the EU financing system was supposed to temporarily complement a decrease in own resources, but was prolonged and reinforced over the years and is today the main component of EU budgetary resources; whereas this predominance has emphasized Member States’ tendency to calculate their net balance, the consequence of which is a series of rebates, corrections, exemptions and compensations which renders the current system of own resources excessively complex, opaque, with insufficient links to existing Union policies and lacks fairness and is therefore incapable to ensure a transparent and efficient financing of Union policies in the European interest, and is finally totally incomprehensible to the European citizens,
Del I: Ključni izzivi
Part I: Key challenges
3. meni, da „trajnostna sredstva za Evropsko Unijo“ pomenijo predvsem, da si je treba na novo zamisliti „sistem virov“ za proračun EU, da bi tako trenutne nacionalne prispevke nadomestili z resnično evropskimi viri;
Considers that ‘Sustainable resources for the European Union’ means first and foremost to rethink the ‘resource system’ of the EU-Budget in order to replace the current national contributions with genuinely European resources;
Gradnja družbe znanja
Building a knowledge -based society
7. meni, da je eden od velikih izzivov Evropske unije ohranjanje konkurenčnosti, povečanje rasti in boj proti visoki brezposelnosti, za izboljšanje zaposlovanja pa je bistvenega pomena osredotočenost na ustrezno delujoče trge dela in socialne pogoje, spodbujanje dostojnega dela, zagotavljanje pravic delavcev po vsej Evropi ter izboljšanje delovnih pogojev in zmanjševanje revščine;
Considers that one of the great challenges facing the European Union is that of maintaining its competitiveness, increasing growth, combating high unemployment, focusing on properly functioning labour markets and on social conditions to improve employment performance, promoting decent work, guarantee workers’ rights throughout Europe as well as working conditions and reducing poverty;
Demografski izziv
The challenge of demography
9. izraža zaskrbljenost, ker bo povečanje števila svetovnega prebivalstva s 6 na 9 milijard zaostrilo svetovno konkurenco za naravne vire in dodatno obremenilo globalno in lokalno okolje; ugotavlja, da se bo povpraševanje po hrani do leta 2050 verjetno povečalo za 70 % in da negospodarna in netrajnostna uporaba ter upravljanje surovin in potrošnih dobrin državljane izpostavlja škodljivi konkurenci med hrano, ohranjanjem narave in proizvodnjo energije kot tudi dragim cenovnim pretresom; to ima lahko resne posledice za industrijo, kar zadeva poslovne priložnosti, vključno z omejenim dostopom do surovin, kar ogroža ekonomsko varnost in vpliva na podnebne spremembe; zato poudarja, da mora EU takoj sprejeti ukrepe in voditi proces prehoda na gospodarstvo, ki bo temeljilo na trajnostnih virih;
Is concerned that the expansion of the world population from 6 to 9 billion will intensify global competition for natural resources and put additional pressure on the global and local environment; notes that demand for food is likely to grow by 70 % by 2050 and that the inefficient and unsustainable use and management of raw materials and commodities exposes citizens to harmful competition between food, nature preservation and energy production, as well as costly price shocks; it can have also severe consequences for industry with regard to business opportunities, including restrictions on access to raw materials, threatening economic security and contributing to climate change; stresses therefore the need for the EU to immediately take action and lead the process towards an economy based on sustainable use of resources;
11. podpira idejo, da bi vse financiranje EU skupaj moralo pripeljati do izboljšanja splošnega stanja evropskega okolja in v njegovem okviru do zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki bi vsaj ustrezalo ciljem sedanje zakonodaje EU; zato predlaga, da se pozitivni in negativni učinki porabe sredstev EU za podnebje in okolje analizirajo zbirno;
Supports the idea that the ensemble of all EU funding taken together should lead to an improvement in the general state of the European environment hereunder a reduction in GHG emissions that at least corresponds to the objectives in the present EU legislation; proposes therefore that positive and negative climate and environment effects of the spending of EU-funds should be analysed on aggregated levels;
Notranja in zunanja varnost ter osebne svoboščine
Internal and external security and personal freedoms
Evropa v svetu: prodoren igralec
Europe in the world: becoming an assertive player
Dobro upravljanje
Delivering good governance
Del II: Optimizacija učinka: vloga proračuna EU
Part II: Optimising delivery: the role of the EU budget
16. meni, da je skupaj s preverjanjem subsidiarnosti v nacionalnih parlamentih, ki je predvideno z Lizbonsko pogodbo, treba v okviru najboljše prakse za vsak zakonodajni predlog, ki je povezan s proračunom, opraviti oceno evropske dodane vrednosti; vendar vztraja pri dejstvu, da je za oceno evropske dodane vrednosti potreben pristop, ki presega preglednice, in da je s politično oceno treba preučiti, ali bo načrtovani ukrep učinkovito in uspešno prispeval k skupnim ciljem EU ter ali bo ustvaril javne dobrine EU; ugotavlja, da glavnih in najpomembnejših elementov evropske dodane vrednosti, kot so mir, stabilnost, svoboda, prost pretok ljudi, blaga, storitev in kapitala, ni mogoče oceniti s številkami;
Considers that, alongside the subsidiarity check through the national parliaments anchored in the Treaty of Lisbon, an assessment of the EAV must be undertaken for each legislative proposal with budgetary relevance as a matter of best practice; insists, however, on the fact that the assessment of EAV needs more than a ‘spreadsheet’s approach’ and that a political evaluation needs to examine whether the planned action will contribute efficiently and effectively to common EU objectives and whether it will create EU public goods; notes that the main and most important elements of the EAV, such as peace, stability, freedom, freedom of movement of people, goods, services and capital, cannot be assessed in numerical terms;
Učinkovit proračun
An efficient budget
21. poudarja, da bi bilo za optimalne rezultate za trajnostno rast in razvoj na terenu, solidarnost in kohezijo treba dati prednost izboljšanju sinergij med vsemi skladi iz proračuna EU, ki vplivajo na gospodarski razvoj, in celostnemu pristopu med različnimi sektorji, razvoju ciljno usmerjenih politik ter, kadar je to primerno, uporabi pogojev, načela "neškodovanja" in "onesnaževalec plača", dejavnikov uspeha in kazalnikov učinkovitosti ter rezultatov;
Stresses that in order to achieve optimal results for sustainable growth and development on the ground, solidarity and cohesion; priority should be given to the improvement of synergies between all funds of the EU budget that have an impact on economic development and to an integrated approach between different sectors, the development of result-oriented policies and, where appropriate, the use of conditionalities, the ‘do no harm’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles, success factors and performance and outcome indicators;
Uporaba proračuna za spodbujanje naložb
Using the budget to leverage investment
25. zato poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga ukrepe za širitev sistema inovativnega financiranja, ki bi sledili njegovemu podrobnemu pregledu in natančni oceni potreb po javnih in zasebnih vlaganjih, kot tudi metodologijo za usklajevanje financiranj iz različnih virov; poziva države članice, naj poskrbijo, da bo njihov nacionalni pravni okvir omogočal izvajanje teh sistemov; zato poziva k vsebinski okrepitvi regulativnega, proračunskega in operativnega okvira teh mehanizmov, da bi se zagotovila njihova učinkovitost glede spodbujanja naložb, trajnosti, ustrezne uporabe sredstev EU ter ustrezen nadzor, poročanje in odgovornost; poleg tega poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti količinsko opredelitev in ustrezno upoštevanje povezanih tveganj;
Calls therefore on the Commission to propose measures to extend the system of innovative financing, after its detailed examination and following a precise assessment of public and private investment needs as well as a methodology for the coordination of funding from different sources; calls on Member States to ensure that their national legal framework enables the implementation of these systems; calls, therefore, for substantive strengthening of the regulatory, budgetary and operational framework of these mechanisms, in order to ensure their effectiveness in terms of leveraging investment, sustainability, proper use of EU resources and to guarantee adequate monitoring, reporting and accountability; insists moreover on the need to ensure that underlying risks are quantified and duly taken into account;
28. poudarja potrebo po zagotovitvi čim večje preglednosti, odgovornosti in demokratičnega nadzora inovativnih finančnih instrumentov in mehanizmov, ki zadevajo proračun EU; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga okvir za izvajanje in upravičenost projektov, določen z običajnim zakonodajnim postopkom, ki bo zagotovil stalen pretok informacij in sodelovanje proračunskega organa glede uporabe teh instrumentov v Uniji, tako da bo lahko Parlament preveril, ali so bile izpolnjene njegove politične prednostne naloge, kot tudi okrepljen nadzor nad temi instrumenti s strani Evropskega računskega sodišča;
Reiterates the need to ensure utmost transparency, accountability and democratic scrutiny for innovative financial instruments and mechanisms that involve the EU budget; calls on the Commission to propose an implementation and project eligibility framework -to be decided through the ordinary legislative procedure- that would ensure a continuous flow of information and participation of the budgetary authority regarding the use of these instruments across the Union, allowing Parliament to verify that its political priorities are met, as well as a strengthened control on such instruments from the European Court of Auditors;