natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Izbrati je treba bolj uravnoteženo rešitev: namesto da se Komisiji dodeli pravica veta na ukrepe, je treba vzpostaviti „regulativni dialog“ med nacionalnim regulativnim organom, ki ukrep predlaga, in omrežjem nacionalnih regulativnih organov v zvezi z ustreznostjo in učinkovitostjo ukrepa.
A more balanced solution should be chosen: instead of giving the Commission an outright veto over remedies, a "regulatory dialogue" on the appropriateness and effectiveness of the remedy should be setup, involving the national regulatory authority proposing the remedy and the Network of national regulatory authorities.
Cilj tega dialoga, med katerim morajo vsi sodelujoči ustrezno upoštevati mnenja udeležencev na trgu, je oblikovanje skupnega mnenje o najbolj ustreznem in učinkovitem ukrepu.
The objective of this dialogue, during which the views of market participants should be duly taken into account by all participants, is to arrive at a joint view on what would represent the most appropriate and effective remedy.
Člen 7 – odstavek 5 a (novo)
Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new)
V zvezi z ukrepi iz odstavka 4(c) se na podlagi resnih dvomov Komisije vzpostavi regulativni dialog med nacionalnim regulativnim organom in mrežo, da se določi najbolj ustrezen in učinkovit ukrep za rešitev zadevnega problema glede konkurence, pri čemer je treba ustrezno upoštevati stališča udeležencev na trgu in doslednost takšnih ukrepov na notranjem trgu.
In relation to measures referred to in paragraph 4(c), the indication of serious doubts by the Commission shall open a regulatory dialogue between the national regulatory authority and the Network with the objective of identifying the most appropriate and effective measure to remedy the competition problem concerned, while taking due account of the views of market participants and the consistency of such measures in the internal market.
Navedeni regulativni dialog ne sme v nobenem primeru prekoračiti dvomesečnega roka, določenega v odstavku 4.
That regulatory dialogue may under no circumstances exceed the two-month period referred to in paragraph 4.
Če mreža po končanem dialogu z dvotretjinsko večino potrdi ustreznost ukrepa, ga lahko nacionalni regulativni organ sprejme.
If, at the end of the regulatory dialogue, the Network confirms, the appropriateness of the measure with a majority of two-thirds the national regulatory authority may adopt the measure.
Če mreža ne potrdi ustreznosti, lahko Komisija svoje resne dvome izrazi z odločitvijo, s katero od nacionalnega regulativnega organa zahteva umik osnutka ukrepa.
If the Network does not so confirm, the Commission may state its serious doubts by a decision requiring the national regulatory authority to withdraw its draft measure.
Nacionalni regulativni organ ima pravico umakniti osnutek ukrepa kadar koli med regulativnim dialogom.
The national regulatory authority has the right to withdraw the draft measure at any stage of the regulatory dialogue.
V roku treh mesecev od sklepa Komisije v skladu z odstavkom 5 , ki od nacionalnega regulativnega organa zahteva umik osnutka ukrepa, nacionalni regulativni organ osnutek ukrepa spremeni ali umakne.
Within three months of the Commission issuing a decision in accordance with paragraph 5 requiring the national regulatory authority to withdraw a draft measure, the national regulatory authority shall amend or withdraw the draft measure.
V roku treh mesecev od sklepa Komisije v skladu z odstavkom 5 ali 5a , ki od nacionalnega regulativnega organa zahteva umik osnutka ukrepa, nacionalni regulativni organ osnutek ukrepa spremeni ali umakne.
Within three months of the Commission issuing a decision in accordance with paragraph 5 or 5a requiring the national regulatory authority to withdraw a draft measure, the national regulatory authority shall amend or withdraw the draft measure.
Člen 7 – odstavek 8
Article 7 – paragraph 8
Komisija dosledno upošteva mnenje organa, ki je predloženo v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe […/ES], zlasti pri oblikovanju podrobnosti obveznosti, ki jo/jih je treba uvesti.
The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion of the Authority submitted in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation […./EC], in particular in elaborating the details of the obligation(s) to be imposed.
Predlog Komisije bi predstavljal resen precedens za zakonodajo notranjega trga, ker bi organ EU nadomestil sklep nacionalnega organa.
The Commission's proposal would constitute a serious precedent in internal market legislation as an EU body would substitute the decision of a national authority.
To je v popolnem neskladju s sistemom medsebojnega nadzora, določenega v Pogodbi ES, pri čemer nacionalni organi izvajajo zakonodajo Skupnosti ob upoštevanju nadzora Sodišča in morebitnih postopkov Komisije za ugotavljanje kršitev.
This completely undermines the system of checks and balances of the EU Treaty, whereby national authorities implement Community law subject to Court control and possible Commission infringement procedures.
Člen 7a – odstavek 2
Article 7a – paragraph 2
„Nebistveni elementi“ iz odstavka 2 niso jasno opredeljeni.
It remains vague what is meant by 'non-essential elements' in paragraph (2).
Takšni predlagani „izvedbeni ukrepi“ imajo lahko znaten finančni učinek na podjetja.
Such proposed 'implementing measures' might have a considerable financial impact on undertakings.
Vsakršne morebitne spremembe morajo biti namenjene celovitemu pregledu v okviru zakonodajnega postopka na ravni EU ali prepuščene državam članicam.
Any potential changes must be reserved to full scrutiny in a legislative procedure on EU-level or left to Member States.
Člen 1 – odstavek 8 – točka e a (novo)
Article 1 – point 8 – point e a (new)
Nacionalni regulativni organi si morajo prizadevati ustvariti ustrezno regulativno okolje za konkurenčne naložbe v nova dostopna omrežja, ki predstavljajo edinstveno priložnost za inovacije in na platformi temelječo konkurenčnost ter tako utirajo pot deregulaciji.
"4a.The national regulatory authorities shall aim at creating the proper regulatory environment for competitive investment in new access networks, which constitutes a unique opportunity for innovation and for platform-based competition paving the way to deregulation.
Takšno regulativno okolje med drugim mora:
Such a regulatory environment should, inter alia:
(a) biti predvidljivo za obdobje, ki je v skladu s časom, potrebnim za donosnost visokih naložb;
(a) be predictable for a period consistent with the time needed for the profitability of heavy investments;
(b) mora biti usmerjeno v čim večjo geografsko širitev konkurence, ki temelji na platformah;
(b) aim at the maximum geographical reach of platform-based competition;
(c) omogočati ustvarjanje konkurenčne prednosti na podlagi hitrejšega zemljepisnega razvoja; s tem spodbujati razvoj omrežja;
(c) enable competitive advantage to be derived from faster geographical roll out; thus encouraging network deployments;
(d) privabljati sredstva s finančnih trgov za visoke predhodne naložbe v nova dostopovna omrežja; in
(d) attract resources from financial markets for high upfront investments in new access networks; and
(e) omogočati prožne trgovinske sporazume glede naložb in delitve tveganja med operaterji, ki razvijajo nova dostopovna omrežja.“
(e) allow flexible commercial agreements on investments and risk-sharing between new access networks operators."
Veljavni regulativni režim je treba prilagoditi izzivom naložb glede razvijanja dostopovnih omrežij naslednje generacije.
The current regulatory regime must be adapted to the investment challenges regarding the roll-out of Next Generation Access Networks.
Regulativni režim mora akterjem na trgu omogočiti naložbe v dostopovna omrežja naslednje generacije, zato morajo upoštevati tveganja v zvezi s tem.
Regulation must enable market players to invest in NGAs and thus must take into account the risks involved.
Zagotovijo, da nacionalni regulativni organi razporedijo in dodelijo take radijske frekvence na podlagi objektivnih, preglednih, nediskriminacijskih in sorazmernih meril.
They shall ensure that the allocation and assignment of such radio frequencies by national regulatory authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
Pri tem morajo države članice spoštovati mednarodne dogovore, upoštevajo pa lahko tudi javna politična stališča.
In so doing, Member States shall respect international agreements and may take public policy considerations into account.
Države članice pospešujejo usklajevanje uporabe radijskih frekvenc v Skupnosti skladno s potrebo po zagotovitvi njihove dejanske in učinkovite uporabe , ki lahko prispeva k uresničitvi gospodarskih meril in interoperabilnosti storitev v dobro potrošnika, ter na podlagi Odločbe št. 676/2002/ES (Odločba o radijskem spektru).
Member States shall promote the harmonisation of use of radio frequencies across the Community, consistent with the need to ensure effective and efficient use thereof , which can contribute to realisation of economy scales and the interoperability of services for the consumer benefit and in accordance with Decision No 676/2002/EC (Radio Spectrum Decision).
Člen 9 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 1
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Razen če ni drugače določeno v drugem pododstavku ali v ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9c , države članice zagotovijo , da se v radiofrekvenčnih pasovih, ki so odprti za elektronske komunikacijske storitve, uporabljajo vse vrste tehnologije radijskega omrežja ali tehnologije za brezžični dostop.
Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph or in the measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c , Member States shall ensure that all types of radio network or wireless access technology may be used in the radio frequency bands open to electronic communications services.
Razen če ni drugače določeno v drugem pododstavku ali v ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členoma 9c in 9d , države članice v okviru svojih zmožnosti omogočijo , da se v skladu z nacionalnim načrtom dodeljevanja frekvenc in pravilnikom o radiokomunikacijah Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze (ITU) v radiofrekvenčnih pasovih, ki so predvideni za elektronske komunikacijske storitve, uporabljajo vse vrste tehnologije radijskega omrežja ali tehnologije za brezžični dostop.
Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph or in the measures adopted pursuant to Articles 9c and 9d , Member States shall , insofar as possible, facilitate the use of all types of radio network or wireless access technology in the radio frequency bands allocated to electronic communications services , in accordance with their respective national fr equency plan and the ITU Radio Regulations .
Sklici na odločbo ES o radijskem spektru iz leta 2002 in pravilnika o radiokomunikacijah Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze so bistvenega pomena, saj zagotavljajo skladnost znotraj predpisov EU ter skladnost med predpisi EU in mednarodnimi predpisi, navedenimi v nacionalnih tabelah za dodelitev frekvenc.
References to the 2002 EC Spectrum Decision and the ITU Radio Regulations are essential to ensure consistency between EU rules, and compliance of EU rules with international rules reflected in national frequency allocation tables.
Za učinkovito upravljanje spektra so odgovorni nacionalni regulativni organi, ki morajo upoštevati postopke Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze.
The effective management of spectrum is the responsibility of the NRA and requires compliance with ITU procedures.
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) upoštevanja zahtev iz mednarodnega sporazuma v zvezi z uporabo radijskih frekvenc ali pravilnika o radiokomunikacijah Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze,
(c) comply with an obligation under an international agreement relating to the use of frequencies or the ITU Radio Regulations,
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) zaščite učinkovite uporabe spektra ali
(ca) safeguard efficient use of spectrum, or
Splošna filozofija politike spektra mora biti usmerjena k zagotavljanju učinkovite uporabe spektra.
The general philosophy of spectrum policy should strive at ensuring efficient use of the spectrum.
Razen če ni drugače določeno v drugem pododstavku ali v ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9c , države članice zagotovijo , da se v radiofrekvenčnih pasovih, odprtih za elektronske komunikacije, nudijo vse vrste elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph or in the measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c , Member States shall ensure that all types of electronic communications services may be provided in the radio frequency bands open to electronic communications.
Vendar pa države članice zagotovijo sorazmerne in nediskriminatorne omejitve za vse vrste ponujenih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
The Member States may, however, provide for proportionate and non‑discriminatory restrictions to the types of electronic communications services to be provided.
Razen če ni drugače določeno v drugem pododstavku, države članice v okviru svojih zmožnosti spodbujajo, da se v radiofrekvenčnih pasovih, odprtih za elektronske komunikacije, uporabljajo vse vrste elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev v skladu z nacionalnim načrtom dodeljevanja frekvenc in pravilnikom o radiokomunikacijah Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze .
Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph, Member States shall, insofar as possible, facilitate the use of all types of electronic communications services in the radio frequency bands open to electronic communications , in accordance with their respective national fr equency plan and the ITU Radio Regulations .
Vendar pa države članice zagotovijo sorazmerne in nediskriminatorne omejitve za vse vrste ponujenih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
The Member States may, however, provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of electronic communications services to be provided.
Omejitve, ki zahtevajo, da se storitev zagotovi v določenem pasu, so upravičene z namenom, da zagotovijo izpolnitev cilja splošnega interesa v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, kot je varstvo človekovega življenja, spodbujanje socialne, regionalne ali teritorialne kohezije, preprečevanje neučinkovite uporabe radijskih frekvenc ali spodbujanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter medijskega pluralizma, kot je opredeljeno v nacionalni zakonodaji v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti .
Restrictions that require a service to be provided in a specific band shall be justified in order to ensure the fulfilment of a general interest objective in conformity with Community law, such as safety of life, the promotion of social, regional or territorial cohesion, the avoidance of inefficient use of radio frequencies , or , as defined in national legislation in conformity with Community law , the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism.
Omejitve, ki zahtevajo, da se elektronska komunikacijska storitev zagotovi v določenem pasu, so upravičene z namenom, da zagotovijo izpolnitev cilja splošnega interesa v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, kot je varstvo človekovega življenja, zagotavljanje univerzalnih ali javnih storitev, spodbujanje socialne, regionalne ali teritorialne kohezije, učinkovita uporaba radijskih frekvenc in učinkovito upravljanje spektra ob upoštevanju mednarodnih obveznosti in praks ali spodbujanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter medijskega pluralizma.
Restrictions that require an electronic communications service to be provided in a specific band shall be justified in order to ensure the fulfilment of a general interest objective in conformity with Community law, such as safety of life, the provision of universal or public services, the promotion of social, regional or territorial cohesion, the efficient use of radio frequencies and the effective management of spectrum to take into account international commitments and practices or the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism.
Omejitev, ki prepoveduje zagotavljanje katere koli druge storitve v določenem pasu, se uporablja samo, če je upravičena s potrebo po varstvu človekovega življenja.
A restriction which prohibits the provision of any other service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services.
Omejitev, ki prepoveduje zagotavljanje katere koli druge elektronske komunikacijske storitve v določenem pasu, se uporablja samo, če je upravičena s potrebo po varstvu človekovega življenja, ali da se zagotovi doseganje splošnega interesa, kakor je opredeljeno v nacionalni zakonodaji v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, kot je spodbujanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter medijskega pluralizma.
A restriction which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services or to ensure the fulfilment of a general interest as defined in national legislation in conformity with Community law, such as the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism .
Za opredelitev obsega in narave vseh izjem so pristojne države članice.
It lies within the competence of the Member States to define the scope and nature of any exception.
Opredelitev kulturnih in medijskih politik sodi med pristojnosti držav članic, zato je treba to v zadostni meri upoštevati.
Definition of cultural and media policies are national competences and this needs to be taken into account sufficiently.
člen 9a se črta
Article 9a deleted
Izsiljen pregled obstoječih pravic naj bi vpeljal večjo poslovno negotovost in ne upošteva poslovne resničnosti številnih operaterjev, katerih naložbe temeljijo na pravicah uporabe radijskih frekvenc in pokrivajo obdobja 15 in več let.
The forced review of existing rights is likely to introduce major business uncertainty and does not take into account the commercial reality of many operators whose investments based on frequencies usage rights cover periods of 15 years or more.
Article 9b – paragraph 1
Article 9b – paragraph 1
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko podjetja prenesejo ali dajo v zakup drugim podjetjem individualne pravice uporabe radijskih frekvenc v pasovih, za katere je to določeno v izvedbenih ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9c, brez predhodnega soglasja nacionalnega regulativnega organa .
Member States shall ensure that undertakings may transfer or lease to other undertakings individual rights to use radio frequencies in the bands for which this is provided in the implementing measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c without the prior consent of the national regulatory authority .
Če je mogoče, države članice zagotovijo, da lahko podjetja prenesejo ali dajo v zakup drugim podjetjem individualne pravice uporabe radijskih frekvenc v pasovih, za katere je to določeno v izvedbenih ukrepih v skladu z nacionalnimi postopki.
Where appropriate, Member States shall ensure that undertakings may transfer or lease to other undertakings individual rights to use radio frequencies in the bands for which this is provided in the implementing measures in accordance with national procedures .
Za trgovanje s spektrom velja načelo subsidiarnosti, zato je treba zadevo obravnavati v skladu z nacionalnimi predpisi.
Spectrum trading falls under subsidiarity and thus should be dealt with according to national provisions.
Člen 9b – odstavek 2
Article 9b – paragraph 2
Države članice zagotovijo, da je namera podjetja, da prenese pravice uporabe radijskih frekvenc, priglašena nacionalnemu regulativnemu organu, ki je odgovoren za razporejanje spektra, ter da se ta namera objavi.
Member States shall ensure that an undertaking’s intention to transfer rights to use radio frequencies is notified to the national regulatory authority responsible for spectrum assignment and is made public.
Države članice zagotovijo, da sta namera podjetja, da prenese pravice uporabe radijskih frekvenc, in dejanski prenos, priglašena pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu, ki je odgovoren za razporejanje spektra, ter da se objavita.
Member States shall ensure that an undertaking’s intention to transfer rights to use radio frequencies as well as the effective transfer is notified to the competent national authority responsible for spectrum assignment and is made public.
Pristojni organ ni vedno nacionalni regulativni organ, kot je opredeljeno v okvirni direktivi.
The competent authority is not always the same authority as the national regulatory authority as defined in the Framework Directive.
Article 9c – paragraph 1– points from a to d
Article 9c – paragraph 1– points from a to d
(a) opredelitev in priporočitev pasov, za katere je dovoljen prenos ali dajanje v zakup pravice uporabe med podjetji, vključno s frekvencami, ki jih države članice načrtujejo za določene storitve, ki bodo zaradi tehnološkega razvoja izrabile celoten potencial digitalne dividende, z izjemo frekvenc, ki jih države članice načrtujejo za radiodifuzijske storitve ;
(a) identify and recommend the bands for which usage rights may be transferred or leased between undertakings , including frequencies planned by Member States for certain services which, as a result of technological development, will make full use of the digital dividend but excluding frequencies planned by Member States for broadcasting services ;
(b) uskladitev pogojev, povezanih s takšnimi pravicami, ter pogojev, postopkov, rokov, omejitev, umikov in prehodnih določb, ki veljajo za takšne prenose ali dajanje v zakup;
(b) harmonise the conditions attached to such rights and the conditions, procedures, limits, restrictions, withdrawals and transitional rules applicable to such transfers or leases;
(c) uskladitev posebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev poštene konkurence, kjer so individualne pravice prenesene;
(c) harmonise the specific measures to ensure fair competition where individual rights are transferred;
(d) določitev izjeme od načela nevtralnosti storitev ali tehnološke nevtralnosti, pa tudi za uskladitev obsega in narave katere koli izjeme od teh načel v skladu s členom 9(3) in (4), razen tistih, ki so namenjene zagotavljanju spodbujanja kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter medijskega pluralizma.
(d) create an exception to the principle of service or technology neutrality, as well as to harmonise the scope and nature of any exceptions to the principle of service or technology neutrality in accordance with paragraphs Article 9(3) and (4) other than those aimed at ensuring the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism.
(d) določitev izjeme od načela nevtralnosti storitev ali tehnološke nevtralnosti, pa tudi za uskladitev obsega in narave katere koli izjeme od teh načel v skladu s členom 9(3) in (4), razen tistih, ki so namenjene zagotavljanju spodbujanja kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter medijskega pluralizma , vključno z radiodifuzijskimi storitvami, in glede na to, da je treba vsem državljanom olajšati dostop do informacijske družbe .
(d) create an exception to the principle of service or technology neutrality, as well as to harmonise the scope and nature of any exceptions to the principle of service or technology neutrality in accordance with paragraphs Article 9(3) and (4) other than those aimed at ensuring the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism including broadcasting services and having regard to the need for better access to the information society for all citizens .
Ukrepi, ki bodo predvidoma sprejeti v okviru postopka komitologije, so precej več kot zgolj „nebistveni elementi“ direktive.
The measures which are proposed to be adopted in comitology are much broader than just ‘non-essential elements of the Directive.
Zaradi tega je treba v členu črtati točki b in c.
Therefore b and c of the article should be deleted.
Oblikovanje medijske politike sodi v skladu z uvodno izjavo 23 med pristojnosti držav članic.
Referring to recital 23 it lies within the competence of the Member States to define media policies.
Article 9c – paragraph 2
Article 9c – paragraph 2