natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega so podlage za zavrnitev naštete v členu 4.
Moreover, the grounds for refusing the registration are listed in Article 4.
S prilogo se ne bi smelo dodati pogojev.
The Annex shouldn't add to those conditions.
Obrazec izjave o podpori
Statement of support form
Polje 1: (vnaprej izpolni organizator )
Box 1: (to be pre-completed by the organiser )
Evidenčna številka, ki jo dodeli Komisija*:
Commission registration number * :
Datum prijave*:
Date of registration * :
Spletni naslov predlagane državljanske pobude v registru Komisije*:
Web address of the proposed citizens' initiative on the Commission register * :
Polje 2: (vnaprej izpolni organizator )
Box 2: (to be pre-completed by the organiser )
Ime predlagane državljanske pobude*: (največ 100 znakov)
Title of proposed citizens’ initiative * : (maximum 100 characters)
Predmet državljanske pobude*: (predmet mora biti jasen, kot je le mogoče) (največ 200 znakov)
Subject-matter * : (the subject should be as clear as possible) (maximum 200 character)
Opis glavnih ciljev predlagane državljanske pobude*: (največ 500 znakov)
Description of the main objectives of the proposed citizens' initiative * : (maximum 500 characters)
Ime in naslov organizatorja *:
Name and address of organiser* :
Spletna stran predlagane državljanske pobude:
Website of the proposed citizens' initiative:
Polje 3: ( izpolni podpisnik )
Box 3 : (to be completed by signatory )
Ime podpisnika :
Name of signatory:
Naslov elektronske pošte:
E-mail address:
Datum in kraj rojstva*:
Date and place of birth *:
Datum rojstva: Kraj in država:
Date of birth: Place and country:
Osebna identifikacijska številka*:
Personal identification number*:
Vrsta identifikacijske številke / osebnega dokumenta*:
Type of identification number/identity document*:
Nacionalna osebna izkaznica: Potni list: Izkaznica socialnega zavarovanja:
National identity card: Passport: S ocial security:
Država članica, ki je izdala identifikacijsko številko / osebni dokument*:
Member State , which issued the identification number/identity document*:
Potrjujem, da so informacije na tem obrazcu pravilne in da sem to predlagano državljansko pobudo podprl le enkrat*.
I hereby certify that the information provided in this form is correct and that I have only supported this proposed citizens' initiative once*.
Datum in podpis podpisnika* ¨ :………..
Date and signature of the signatory* ¨ : ………..
*: obvezna polja
*: mandatory fields
¨ : podpis ni potreben, če se obrazec pošlje elektronsko
¨ : signature not required when form is submitted electronically
Polje 1: (vnaprej izpolnijo organizatorji )
Box 1: (to be pre-completed by the organisers )
Evidenčna številka, ki jo dodeli Komisija:
Commission registration number:
Datum registracije:
Date of registration:
Spletni naslov predlagane državljanske pobude v registru Komisije:
Web address of the proposed citizens' initiative on the Commission register:
Polje 2: (vnaprej izpolnijo organizatorji )
Box 2: (to be pre-completed by the organisers )
Ime predlagane državljanske pobude: (največ 100 znakov)
Title of the proposed citizens’ initiative: (maximum 100 characters)
Predmet državljanske pobude: (predmet mora biti jasen, kot je le mogoče) (največ 200 znakov)
Subject-matter: (the subject should be as clear as possible) (maximum 200 character)
Opis glavnih ciljev predlagane državljanske pobude*: (največ 500 znakov)
Description of the main objectives of the proposed citizens' initiative*: (maximum 500 characters)
Ime in naslov organizatorjev :
Name and address of the organisers :
Ime in naslov kontaktnih oseb:
Name and address of the contact persons:
Spletna stran predlagane državljanske pobude*:
Website of the proposed citizens' initiative * :
Polje 3: ( izpolnijo podpisniki )
Box 3 : (to be completed by signatories )
Naslov stalnega prebivališča
Address of permanent residence
Datum in kraj rojstva
Date and place of birth
Datum podpisa
Date of signature
Podpisniki lahko posamezno predlagano državljansko pobudo podprejo le enkrat.
Signatories may only support a given proposed citizens’ initiative once!
* Če obstajajo.
* If any.
Na obrazcu mora biti več vrstic za zbiranje podpisov, saj se tako običajno zbirajo v praksi.
The form should contain several rows for the collection of signatures, because that is how signatures are usually collected in practice.
Priloga III– polje 3 – točka 6
Annex III – box 3 – point 6
Osebna identifikacijska številka*:
Personal identification number *:
Nacionalna osebna izkaznica: Potni list: Izkaznica socialnega zavarovanja:
National identity card: Passport: Social security:
Obrazec vloge za presojo dopustnosti predlagane državljanske pobude
Form for the request of a decision on the admissibility of a proposed citizens’ initiative
Ime državljanske pobude*:
Title of citizens’ initiative*:
Evidenčna številka, ki jo dodeli Komisija*:
Commission registration number*:
Datum prijave*:
Date of registration*:
Število prejetih izjav o podpori*:
Number of statements of support received*:
Število podpisnikov iz posamezne države članice*:
Number of signatories per Member States*:
Število podpisnikov
Number of signatories
Izjavljam, da so podatki na tem obrazcu pravilni.
I hereby declare that the information provided in this form is correct.
Datum in podpis organizatorja*:
Date and signature of the organiser*:
Člen 8 se črta.
Article 8 is deleted.
Obrazec za predložitev izjav o podpori pristojnim organom držav članic
Form for the submission of statements of support to the Member States’ competent authorities
Polno ime, poštni naslov in elektronski poštni naslov organizatorja ali, v primeru pravne osebe ali organizacije, njenega zakonitega zastopnika *:
Full name, postal address and e-mail address of the organiser or, in the case of a legal entity or organisation, its legal representative *:
Datum vloge za presojo dopustnosti*:
Date of request for a decision on admissibility*:
Število podpisnikov iz [ime države članice]*:
Number of signatories coming from [name of MS]*:
( Priložite vse izjave o podpori podpisnikov, ki so podrobno navedli osebno identifikacijsko številko, ki jo je izdala ista država članica.
(Include all statements of support from signatories having specified a personal identification number issued by the same Member State .
Po potrebi priložite ustrezna potrdila, ki potrjujejo, da sistem spletnega zbiranja izpolnjuje pogoje iz Uredbe xxxx/xxxx.)
If applicable, include the relevant certificate(s) certifying that the conformity of the online collection system with Regulation xxxx/xxxx)
Datum in podpis organizatorja *:
Date and signature of the organiser *:
Polno ime, poštni naslov in elektronski poštni naslov kontaktnih oseb *:
Full name, postal address and e-mail address of the contact persons *:
(Po potrebi priložite ustrezna potrdila, ki potrjujejo, da sistem spletnega zbiranja izpolnjuje pogoje iz Uredbe xxxx/xxxx.)
(If applicable, include the relevant certificate(s) certifying that the conformity of the online collection system with Regulation xxxx/xxxx)
Datum in podpis organizatorjev *:
Date and signature of the organisers *:
Obrazec za predložitev državljanske pobude Komisiji
Form for the submission of a citizens’ initiative to the Commission
Število prejetih ustreznih izjav o podpori*: (mora biti večje od milijona)
Number of eligible statements of support received*: (must be over 1 million)
Število podpisnikov, ki so jih potrdile države članice*:
Number of signatories certified by Member States*:
Polno ime, poštni naslov in elektronski poštni naslov organizatorja ali, v primeru pravne osebe ali organizacije, njenega zakonitega zastopnika .
Full name, postal address and e-mail address of the organiser or, in the case of a legal entity or organisation, its legal representative.
Izjavljam , da so podatki na tem obrazcu pravilni.
I hereby declare that the information provided in this form is correct.
Polno ime, poštni naslov in elektronski poštni naslov kontaktnih oseb .
Full name, postal address and e-mail address of the contact persons .
Izjavljamo , da so podatki na tem obrazcu pravilni.
We, hereby declare that the information provided in this form is correct.
Priloga VIII – točka 6 a (novo)
Annex VIII – point 6 a (new)
Vsi viri financiranja in podpore pobude, vključno z višino finančne podpore v času predložitve.
All sources of funding and support for the initiative, including the amount of financial support at the time of submission.
Evropska državljanska pobuda bo zelo pomembno orodje pri oblikovanju programov.
The European Citizens' Initiative will be a powerful agenda-setting instrument.
Predstavljena je bila s pogodbo o ustavi za Evropo in nato z Lizbonsko pogodbo, njen cilj pa je državljanom podeliti enako moč pri oblikovanju političnih pobud, kot jo že imata Svet ministrov in Evropski parlament.
It was introduced in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and then in the Lisbon Treaty, with the aim of empowering citizens with the same political initiative powers that the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament already enjoy.
Še zlasti je namenjena temu, da bi prisluhnili državljanom in jim dali na voljo sredstvo za naslovitev nekaterih vprašanj na evropske institucije.
It is in particular meant to provide citizens with a means to be heard by enabling them to refer some issues of interest to the European institutions.
To so lahko težave, s katerimi se srečujejo v vsakdanjem življenju in ki jim po njihovem mnenju sindikati, politične ustanove ali drugi redni sogovorniki institucij ne namenjajo dovolj pozornosti oziroma podpore.
These may include difficulties that they face in their daily lives which they do not feel receive enough attention or support from trade unions, political institutions or any other regular interlocutor of the institutions.
S pobudo se bo resnično vzpostavilo neposredni odnos med državljani in institucijami, jih zbližalo in zagotovilo, da bodo institucije EU obravnavale konkretna vprašanja, ki so za državljane pomembna.
It will indeed establish a direct link between the citizens and the institutions, thus bridging the gap between them and ensuring that the EU institutions will address the concrete problems which are of importance to them.
Drugi cilj evropske državljanske pobude je spodbuditi čezmejne razprave v Evropski uniji.
The other aim of the European Citizens' Initiative is to foster greater cross-border debates within the EU.
Prav zaradi tega sta poročevalca predlagala, da bi se organizatorji evropske državljanske pobude povezali v državljanski odbor, katerega člani bi prihajali iz različnih držav članic.
This is precisely why your rapporteurs have made the suggestion that the organisers of a European Citizens' Initiative should gather into a citizens' committee composed of persons coming from different Member States.
S tem bi zagotovili, da bodo vprašanja, ki se bodo porajala, resnično evropska, hkrati pa bi od samega začetka doprinesli k zbiranju podpisov.
This will ensure that the issues which arise are truly European, all the while having the added value of helping the collection of signatures from the very beginning.
Evropski parlament bo k doseganju teh ciljev lahko prispeval z vsemi sredstvi, ki so mu na voljo za podporo izbranim državljanskim pobudam, zlasti z organizacijo javnih predstavitev in s sprejemanjem resolucij.
The European Parliament will be able to contribute to the achievement of these goals by making use of all the means in its power to support the Citizens' Initiatives of its choice, notably through the organisation of public hearings or the adoption of resolutions.
Državljanska pobuda bo uspela le, če bo urejena na državljanom prijazen način in ne bo vsebovala nadležnih obveznosti, ki bi ustvarjale razočaranje med organizatorji.
The Citizens' Initiative will only succeed if its regulation is citizen-friendly and does not create cumbersome obligations for and frustration among the organisers.
S tem v mislih sta si poročevalca prizadevala za lažjo uporabo tega instrumenta in preprečevanju tega, da bi se državljane vabilo k podpisu pobud, ki ne bi bile dopustne.
In this frame of mind, your rapporteurs have worked to make this instrument easier to use and to guarantee that citizens will not be asked to sign Initiatives which might not be admissible.
S tem bi zagotovili odgovornost pobude in njeno učinkovitost, kar je oboje bistveno za njen uspeh.
These ensure its liability and thus its efficiency, both of which will be the key to its success.
Zato je treba nujno zagotoviti, da je postopek v skladu z zahtevami EU na področju varstva podatkov in da je od začetka do konca popolnoma pregleden.
Hence, it is crucial to ensure that the process is in line with the EU data protection requirements and that it is fully transparent, from the start until the end.
Možnost podpore evropski državljanski pobudi bodo imele vse organizacije, združenja ali politične stranke, v kolikor bo ta podpora podvržena popolni preglednosti, tako da bodo podpisniki, preden se odločijo za podporo neki pobudi, vedeli, kdo stoji za njo.
Indeed, every organisation, association, or even political party, will have the possibility to support the European Citizens' Initiatives of their choice as long as there is a full transparency regarding their support so that the signatories will know who is behind an initiative before they choose to support it or not.
Da bi se izognili razočaranju, ki lahko neposredno sledi visokim pričakovanjem, ki jih ustvarja evropska državljanska pobuda, bi rada poročevalca tudi poudarila, da vsaka uspešna pobuda ne bo pripeljala do tega, da bi Komisija oblikovala zakonodajni predlog.
In order to avoid disappointment and frustration (that might be the direct consequence of the high expectations that surround the European Citizen' Initiative), your rapporteurs would also like to underline that not all successful Initiatives will end up with the Commission putting forward a legislative proposition.
Komisija namreč ohranja monopol pri zakonodajnih pobudah in bo na koncu odločala, kateri koraki bodo po uspešni državljanski pobudi sprejeti.
Indeed, the Commission's monopoly of legislative initiative prevails and, in the end, it will be the one deciding on the follow-up to be given to successful Citizens' Initiatives.
To pa seveda ostalim institucijam EU ne preprečuje, da ne bi o določeni zadevi podale svojega mnenja.
Of course, this does not prevent the other EU institutions from voicing their opinion for or against any given matter.
Nenazadnje bi poročevalca rada tudi poudarila, da je evropska državljanska pobuda novo orodje participativne demokracije na celinski ravni.
Last but not least, they would also like to stress that the European Citizens' Initiative is a new instrument of participatory democracy on a continental scale.
Zaradi tega ta uredba morda ni brez napak, praksa pa lahko prinese snovalcem evropske politike nove izzive.
Therefore, the present regulation may not be flawless and practice may present European decision-makers with new challenges.
Zaradi tega je Komisija zaprošena, da vsaka tri leta predstavi poročilo o izvajanju uredbe in po potrebi predlaga njeno revizijo.
This is the reason why they asked the Commission to present a report on its implementation every three years and, if relevant, to propose a revision of the regulation.
Pripravljavca mnenja(*): Gerald Häfner in
Rapporteurs(*): Gerald Häfner and
(*) Pridruženi odbori – člen 50 poslovnika
(*) Procedure with associated committees – Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
Evropska komisija je konec marca 2010 uradno predložila besedilo osnutka uredbe, ki je od tedaj predmet številnih razprav in predstavitev.
At the end of March 2010 the European Commission officially tabled the text of the Draft Regulation which has formed the basis for the many debates, hearings and discussions which have taken place ever since.
Razprav niso organizirali le pristojni odbori, torej zlasti odbora AFCO in PETI, temveč so potekale tudi na srečanju odborov AFCO-PETI z nacionalnimi parlamenti.
Such debates have not only been conducted in the Committees responsible - notably of course AFCO and PETI, but also during a joint AFCO-PETI meeting with National Parliaments.
Svoje predstavitve na to temo so organizirale tudi skoraj vse politične skupine v Parlamentu in mogoče je trditi, da v dejavnostih Parlamenta doslej še nikoli ni prišlo do tako razširjene in odprte razprave.
Almost all of the political groups in Parliament have also organised their own hearings on the subject and it is probably correct to say that never has there been such widespread and open debate about a Draft Regulation in the history of the Parliament's activities.
Zaradi svoje vsebine – pravice evropskih državljanov ali zakonitih rezidentov, da neposredno vplivajo na razvoj evropske politike in zakonodajne ukrepe – je zadeva zelo pomembna za vse vpletene institucije.
Given the subject however, - the right of European citizens or legal residents to impact directly on the development European policies and legislative measures, much is at stake for all the institutions involved.
Parlament je to potrdil s tem, ko se je strinjal, da bo Odbor za peticije v skladu s členom 50 poslovnika izjemoma vključen v zakonodajni proces, saj imajo njegovo znanje in izkušnje v zvezi s pravicami državljanov, ki so izražene s pravico do peticije, veliko skupnega z državljansko pobudo.
Parliament recognised this when it agreed that, on an exceptional basis, the Petitions Committee would be involved in a legislative process, under the terms of Article 50 of the Rules of Procedure, because of its knowledge and expertise in relation to the rights of citizens as expressed through the right of petition with which the 'Citizens' initiative' has much in common.
To je dejansko prvi primer, ko je Odbor za peticije vključen v kakršnokoli zakonodajno dejavnost.
This is, in fact, the first time the Petitions Committee has been involved in legislative activity of any sort.
Po mnenju Parlamenta je prav tako zaželeno, da se pristojnim odborom omogoči imenovanje soporočevalcev in ne le enega poročevalca, da bi tako zagotovili najširšo osnovo za dogovor o vprašanju.
Parliament also considered it to be desirable to allow the Committees responsible to appoint co-rapporteurs, rather than a single rapporteur, in order to ensure the broadest base for an agreement on the issue.
Tako sta AFCO in nato PETI imenovala svoja dva soporočevalca in vsi štirje so se že večkrat srečali (tudi na srečanjih s pripravljavci mnenj iz drugih odborov), da bi oblikovali enotno, dobro utemeljeno besedilo uredbe, ki bi bila enostavnejša, uporabnikom bolj prijazna, bolj praktična in preglednejša ter bi bila bolj prilagojena sodobnemu okolju, v katerem se razvijajo evropske politike.
Accordingly AFCO, and then PETI, appointed their co-rapporteurs and since then all four have met on a large number of occasions (including meetings with other committee rapporteurs for opinion) in order to deliver a single well-motivated document which represents a more simplified, more user-friendly, more practical and more transparent regulation, better tuned to the contemporary environment within which European politics is evolving.
Kaj bo Lizbonska pogodba pomenila evropskim državljanom, je odvisno od tega, kako bodo ocenili izvajanje državljanske pobude.
If the Lisbon Treaty is to mean anything to European citizens then it is on the basis of the functioning of the Citizens' Initiative that it will be judged.
Kot rezultat obsežnih posvetovanj in razprav je bilo k osnutku Komisije in znanemu stališču Sveta dodanih določeno število pomembnih sprememb.
As a result of extensive consultation and debate, a number of important changes have been introduced compared to the Commission's draft and the known position of Council.
Te vključujejo predvsem spremenjeni postopek prijave (ki je povezana s pogoji in merili dopustnosti) in uvedbo najbolj pomembne spremembe, s katero bo pravica do podpisa podeljena vsem evropskim državljanom, ki že imajo16 let.
These concern above all the modifications to the registration procedure (itself related to the conditions and the criteria for admissibility) and the introduction of a most significant change which will give the 'right to sign' to all European citizens of the age of 16 and above.
Ocenjuje se, da je to bistvenega pomena in da bo med mladimi v šolah in univerzah nedvomno omogočalo boljše in bolj informirane razprave o Evropi in njeni prihodnosti, pomembno pa se bo povečal tudi delež mladih v prihodnjih politikah.
This is considered to be essential and it will inevitably provide a means to generate better and more informed debates about Europe and its future amongst the youth of today in their schools and colleges, and also provide them as well with a potentially important additional stake in tomorrow's policies.
Tretji element je potrditev, da bi morale biti vse uspešne pobude deležne javne predstavitve v institucijah, pri čemer namerava igrati posebno vlogo zlasti Odbor za peticije.
A third element is the affirmation that all successful initiatives should be entitled to be heard by the institutions at a public hearing, where the Petitions Committee in particular, intends to play a major role.
Poročevalci na koncu menijo, da prevelika pozornost, ki jo Komisija in države članice namenjajo preverjanju istovetnosti, preveč ovira uspešno udeležbo, zato je bil predlagan enostavnejši postopek, katerega cilj je posameznikom preprečiti, da bi se podpisali več kot enkrat, pri čemer se ohrani verodostojnost predloga.
Lastly, it is considered most important by the co-rapporteurs, that the excessive attention placed by the Commission and the Member States on identity verification creates too many barriers for effective participation and a more simplified procedure is proposed which concentrates on ensuring that safeguards are introduced to prevent individuals from signing more than once and otherwise ensure that the credibility of the proposal is maintained.
Državljansko pobudo v skladu s pogoji Lizbonske pogodbe državljani naslovijo na Komisijo, ki mora za prevzem novih obveznosti uvesti nekatere pomembne administrativne spremembe.
The Citizens Initiative, under the terms of the Treaty of Lisbon, is addressed by citizens to the Commission which, as a result, must make some important administrative changes to accommodate their new responsibility.
Osnutki sprememb, ki jih predlagajo soporočevalci, bi podelili državljanom enake pravice do pobude, kot jih ima Parlament, ki že ima pravico do pobude v skladu s členom 225 Lizbonske pogodbe in odstavkom 16 okvirnega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
The draft changes proposed by the co-rapporteurs would provide citizens with the same rights of initiative as the Parliament which already enjoys a right of initiative under the terms of Article 225 of the Lisbon Treaty and the Interinstitutional Framework Agreement, paragraph 16.
Treba je razumeti, da daje državljanska pobuda evropskim državljanom pravico do zakonodajnega predloga in se razlikuje od pravice do peticije, ki je bila predpisana v vseh pogodbah EU po Maastrichtu.
It must be understood that the Citizens' Initiative gives the right to Europe's citizens to make a legislative proposal and it is distinct from the right of petition which has been enshrined in all EU Treaties since Maastricht.
Člen 227 Lizbonske pogodbe določa: „Vsi državljani Unije in vse fizične ali pravne osebe s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic imajo pravico, da samostojno ali skupaj z drugimi državljani ali osebami naslovijo na Evropski parlament peticijo glede vprašanj, ki sodijo na področje delovanja Unije in ki jih neposredno zadevajo. ”
In Article 227 of the Lisbon Treaty, it states "Any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its recognised office in a Member State, shall have the right to address, individually, or in association with other citizens or persons, a petition to the European Parliament on a matter which comes within the Union's fields of activity and which affects him, her or it directly."
Peticijo tako državljani ali rezidenti naslovijo na Evropski parlament.
A petition is thus addressed by citizens or residents to the European Parliament.