natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Upravni odbor Mednarodnega denarnega sklada je po uresničitvi predhodno dogovorjenih ukrepov 8. julija 2009 odobril posojilo v višini 1,15 milijarde EUR za tri leta.
After prior action agreed with the IMF had been taken, the IMF Board approved on 8 July 2009 the EUR 1.15 billion loan for a three-year period.
Prvi obrok, približno 203 milijonov EUR, je bil izplačan takoj po odobritvi.
The first instalment of around EUR 203 million was disbursed immediately.
Znesek pomoči Skupnosti ustreza 77 % preostalih potreb Bosne in Hercegovine po financiranju za leto 2010 v okviru programa Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, ki presegajo makroekonomsko podporo Mednarodnega denarnega sklada in Svetovne banke.
The amount of Community assistance corresponds to 77% of the residual financing needs of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the year 2010 in the context of the IMF programme, over and above macro-economic support provided by the IMF and the World Bank.
Preostali del (30 milijonov EUR) se bo pokril z odlogom dolga do Londonskega kluba.
The remaining part (EUR 30 million) will be covered by London Club debt deferment.
Pri tej precejšnji delitvi bremena s Skupnostjo so upoštevane trenutne izjemne razmere, saj širjenje gospodarske krize močno negativno vpliva na gospodarstvo Bosne in Hercegovine.
This high burden sharing by the Community takes account of the current exceptional juncture, as the unfolding of the economic crisis is having a severe effect on Bosnia and Herzegovina's economy.
Predlog dopolnjuje evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva in stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni proces.
The proposal is complementary to the European Economic Recovery Programme and the Stabilisation and Association Process.
Potem ko je natančno preučil navedene možnosti in glede na strateško pomembnost, ki jo EU pripisuje Bosni in Hercegovini kot morebitni kandidatki za vstop v EU, poročevalec predlaga, da se sedanji predlogi izjemoma sprejmejo brez sprememb s poenostavljenim postopkom, še preden začne veljati Lizbonska pogodba.
Having carefully considered these options and considering Bosnia and Herzegovina 's strategic importance to the EU as a potential candidate country for EU accession, your rapporteur suggests adopting the current proposal exceptionally without amendments under the 'simplified procedure' before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Tak časovni razpored v zakonodajnem postopku ni sprejemljiv in ga ne gre obravnavati kot izjemo od institucionalnih pooblastil, vendar je, kot kaže, edina sprejemljiva možnost za pravočasni prenos sredstev ES v Bosno in Hercegovino.
Such timetable is not acceptable in a legislative procedure and it should not be seen as an exception to institutional powers, but it seems as the only viable option for ensuring transfer of EC funds to Bosnia and Herzegovina in due time.
Makrofinančna pomoč Bosni in Hercegovini
Macro-financial assistance for Bosnia and Herzegovina
o osnutku Sklepa Sveta o sprejetju izvedbenih pravil za analitične delovne datoteke Europola
on the draft Council decision adopting the implementing rules for Europol analysis work files
– ob upoštevanju besedila Sveta (11947/2009),
– having regard to the text of the Council (11947/2009),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2009/371/PNZ z dne 6. aprila 2009 o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (Europol)
– having regard to Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol)
– ob upoštevanju členov 39(1) in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0108/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0108/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7‑0068/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0068/2009 ),
Izvedbena pravila za Europolove delovne datoteke za analizo
Implementing rules for Europol analysis work files
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o določitvi seznama tretjih držav in organizacij, s katerimi Europol sklene sporazume
on the draft Council decision determining the list of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements
Poročevalec: Jan Philipp Albrecht
Rapporteur: Jan Philipp Albrecht
– ob upoštevanju besedila Sveta (11946/2009),
– having regard to the text of the Council (11946/2009),
– ob upoštevanju členov 39(1) in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0107/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0107/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7‑0069/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0069/2009 ),
Seznam tretjih držav in organizacij, s katerimi Europol sklene sporazume
List of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktiv 2002/21/ES o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, 2002/19/ES o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju in 2002/20/ES o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services
Predsednik delegacije:
Delegation chair:
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3677/2009 – C7‑0273/2009 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3677/2009 – C7‑0273/2009 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0449 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0697 ),
Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0449 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0697 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 6.5.2009, P6_TA(2009)0361 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 6.5.2009, P6_TA(2009)0361 . on the Council common position
UL C 103 E, 5.5.2009, str.
OJ C 103 E, 5.5.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2009)0420 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2009)0420 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A7‑0070/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A7‑0070/2009 ),
Predstavila ga je skupaj s predlogom direktive o spremembi direktive o univerzalnih storitvah in direktive o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah (Poročilo HARBOUR, 2007/0248(COD) ) ter predlogom uredbe o ustanovitvi evropskega organa za trg elektronskih komunikacij (kasneje preimenovanega v organ evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije, krajše organ BEREC) (poročilo DEL CASTILLO, 2007/0249(COD) ).
It was presented together with the proposal for a directive amending the universal service directive and the e-privacy directive (Report HARBOUR, 2007/0248(COD) ) and the proposal for a regulation establishing the European electronic communications market authority (later the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications - BEREC; Report DEL CASTILLO, 2007/0249(COD) ).
Prva obravnava v Parlamentu je bila 24. septembra 2008, Svet pa je novembra 2008 dosegel politični dogovor.
The first reading of Parliament took place on 24 September 2008 and Council reached a political agreement in November 2008.
Pogajanja o dogovoru v drugi obravnavi so se odvijala med češkim predsedovanjem od januarja 2009.
Negotiations in view of reaching a 2nd reading agreement took place under the Czech Presidency since January 2009.
Po intenzivnih pogajanjih s Svetom so bili v drugi obravnavi doseženi dogovori o treh poročilih iz telekomunikacijskega svežnja.
Following intensive negotiations, 2nd reading agreements were reached with Council on the three reports of the telecom package.
6. maja 2009 je bilo na plenarnem zasedanju glasovanje o treh poročilih iz telekomunikacijskega svežnja.
On 6 May 2009 the Plenary voted the three reports of the Telecom Package.
Na plenarnem zasedanju sta bila izglasovana dogovora o poročilih HARBOUR in DEL CASTILLO.
The plenary confirmed the agreement reached in case of the reports HARBOUR and DEL CASTILLO.
V zvezi s poročilom TRAUTMANN pa je bil sprejet dodaten predlog spremembe, ki ni bil del dogovora, doseženega s Svetom v drugi obravnavi.
In the case of the TRAUTMANN report, however, one amendment which was not part of the overall agreement reached with Council in 2nd reading was also adopted.
Ta predlog spremembe (t. i. predlog spremembe 138) od nacionalnih regulativnih organov zahteva spodbujanje interesov državljanov Evropske unije med drugim tako, da „jih vodi načelo, da nobeno omejevanje temeljnih pravic in svoboščin končnih uporabnikov ne sme biti sprejeto brez predhodnega sklepa pravosodnega organa, zlasti v skladu s členom 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije o svobodi izražanja in informiranja; v primeru ogrožanja javne varnosti pa je lahko sklep pravosodnega organa naknaden“ .
This amendment (so called amendment 138) required national regulatory authorities to promote the interests of the citizens of the European Union by inter alia " applying the principle that no restriction may be imposed on the fundamental rights and freedoms of end-users, without a prior ruling by the judicial authorities, notably in accordance with Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on freedom of expression and information, save when public security is threatened in which case the ruling may be subsequent."
Majsko zasedanje je bilo zadnje pred evropskimi volitvami junija, zato je bilo mogoče nadaljevati s postopkom šele septembra.
Since the May plenary had been the last plenary before the June European elections the procedure could only be resumed in September.
Delegacija Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru se je prvič sestala 28. septembra.
The constituent meeting of the EP delegation to the Conciliation Committee took place on 28 September.
Na tej seji je delegacija odločila, da se v pogajanjih osredotoči na vprašanje predloga spremembe 138.
At that meeting the delegation decided to focus the negotiations on the issues of the amendment 138.
Delegacija je imenovala pogajalsko skupino, ki jo sestavljajo Alejo Vidal-Quadras (podpredsednik in predsednik delegacije), Catherine Trautmann (poročevalka) in Herbert Reul (predsednik Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko).
The delegation appointed the negotiating team composed of Mr Vidal-Quadras, Vice-President and Chair of the delegation, Mrs Trautmann, rapporteur, and Mr Reul, Chair of the ITRE Committee.
Na prvem trialogu 29. septembra je predsedstvo pojasnilo, zakaj Svet ne more sprejeti predloga spremembe 138.
In the 1st trilogue which took place on 29 September the Presidency explained why the Council was not in a position to accept amendment 138.
Stališče sveta je imelo predvsem pravne temelje.
The Council’s position was mainly based on legal grounds.
V primeru razširjanja otroške pornografije po internetu, na primer, o tem odloča tožilec, pri čemer za njegove odločitve velja sodni nadzor in varovalni mehanizmi, ki so v celoti skladni z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah.
For example, in a case involving dissemination of child pornography material through the Internet, in many Member States this is up to a prosecutor, whose decisions are of course subject to judicial review and safeguards in full compliance with the European Convention of Human Rights.
Delegacija EP je obravnavala utemeljitev Sveta na svoji drugi seji 7. oktobra.
The arguments brought forward by the Council were discussed at a 2nd meeting of the EP delegation on 7 October.
Pravno službo Parlamenta je pozvala k pripravi pravnega mnenja, v katerem je bila ugotovljena trdna podlaga za pomislek, da sprememba 138 presega pristojnosti Skupnosti iz člena 95 Pogodbe ES.
Parliament's Legal Service was also invited to prepare a legal opinion which found serious grounds for considering that the amendment 138 goes beyond the competence of the Community as laid down in Article 95 of the EC Treaty.
Sledila sta dva trialoga 13. oktobra in 22. oktobra ter seja delegacije 20. oktobra, nakar je bila 4. novembra sklicana seja Spravnega odbora za.
Following two further trilogues on 13 October and 22 October as well as a delegation meeting on 20 October the Conciliation Committee was convened for 4 November.
Spravna pogajanja 4. novembra so se začela s sejo delegacije EP.
The evening of the Conciliation negotiation of 4 November started with a meeting of the EP delegation.
Delegacija je obravnavala najnovejši kompromisni predlog Sveta, ki je nastal na zasedanju Coreperja 28. oktobra.
The delegation discussed the latest Council compromise proposal resulting from Coreper of 28 October.
Najpomembnejša zahteva delegacije je bila, da se besedilu „ pravičen in nepristranski postopek “, ki mu je treba slediti pred sprejetjem ukrepov v zvezi z dostopom uporabnikov, ki bi lahko omejili njihove temeljne pravice, doda beseda „ predhoden “.
The most important request of the delegation was the addition of the word " prior " to the wording " fair and impartial procedure " which needs to be followed before measures regarding users' access liable to restrict their fundamental rights are taken.
Seji delegacije je sledil trialog.
Following the delegation meeting a trilogue took place.
Svet je zastopala Åsa Torstensson, švedska ministrica za komunikacije, Evropsko komisijo pa komisar Reding.
The Council was represented by Åsa Torstensson, Swedish Minister for Communication, and Commissioner Reding represented the European Commission.
Na tem trialogu, ki je trajal več kot dve uri in je bil večkrat dalj časa prekinjen zaradi usklajevanja kompromisnega besedila znotraj skupin, je bila dosežena kompromisna rešitev.
A compromise solution was found in this trilogue which went on for more than two hours and was in large parts interrupted by a more restricted meeting trying to establish the compromise text.
Nato se je sestala delegacija EP.
The EP delegation met subsequently.
Kompromis je bil po intenzivni razpravi in prekinitvi zaradi posvetovanja političnih skupin sprejet.
The compromise was accepted by unanimity following an intensive discussion and an interruption of the meeting to allow political groups to consult.
Spravni odbor v celoti se je sestal ob 0:30, da bi zapečatili dogovor.
The full Conciliation Committee met at 00.30 a.m. to seal the agreement.
Na tej seji je komisar Reding oznanil tudi, da bo Komisija podala izjavo o „ nevtralnosti omrežja “.
At that meeting Commissioner Reding also announced that the Commission will make a declaration on " net-neutrality ".
Dogovorjeno je bilo, da se besedilo kompromisa vstavi v člen 1 okvirne direktive.
It was agreed to include the text of the compromise in Article 1 of the Framework Directive.
S tem postane zavezujoče za celoten ureditveni okvir.
It becomes therefore an obligation for the whole regulatory framework.
Dogovorjeno besedilo zagotavlja, da se lahko ukrep omejitve dostopa do interneta uporabniku „ naloži le, če je primeren, sorazmeren in potreben znotraj demokratične družbe “.
The text agreed provides that restrictions on a user's internet access may " only be imposed if they are appropriate, proportionate and necessary within a democratic society".
Takšni ukrepi so lahko sprejeti samo „ ob ustreznem upoštevanju načela o predpostavljanju nedolžnosti in pravice do zasebnosti “ ter po „ predhodnem, pravičnem in nepristranskem postopku “, ki uporabniku zagotavlja „ pravico do zaslišanja (...) in pravico do učinkovitega in pravočasnega sodnega sodnega nadzora “.
Such measures may be taken only "with due respect for the principle of presumption of innocence and the right to privacy" and as a result of "a prior, fair and impartial procedure" guaranteeing "the right to be heard (...) and the right to an effective and timely judicial review."
Parlament je s tem, ko je s Svetom dosegel dogovor o kompromisnem besedilu, dosegel svoj cilj, da v to zakonodajo vključi takšne določbe (ki jih Komisija ni predlagala in ki jih skupno stališče Sveta ni vsebovalo) ter da uporabnikom interneta zagotovi kar največja jamstva, ki jih še dopušča pravna podlaga.
By reaching an agreement with Council on the compromise text Parliament achieved its objective of including such provisions in this legislation (which had not been proposed by the Commission and which were also not included in the common position of Council) and by laying down the maximum of guarantees for internet users possible on the legal basis.
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktiv 2002/21/ES o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, 2002/19/ES o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju in 2002/20/ES o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to and interconnection of electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services
o pobudi Kraljevine Švedske in Kraljevine Španije za sprejetje okvirnega sklepa Sveta o akreditaciji dejavnosti forenzičnih laboratorijev
on the initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Spain for adoption of a Council framework decision on accreditation of forensic laboratory activities
– ob upoštevanju pobude Kraljevine Švedske in Kraljevine Španije (11419/2009)
– having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Spain (11419/2009)
– ob upoštevanju členov 39(1) in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0100/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0100//2009),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7‑0071/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0071/2009 ),
A. ker se v povezavi z osnutkom pobude Kraljevine Švedske in Kraljevine Španije (11419/2009) postavlja vprašanje pravilne pravne podlage,
A. Whereas the draft initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Spain (11419/2009) raises issues in terms of the correct legal basis;
o pobudi Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Češke, Zvezne republike Nemčije, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Republike Madžarske, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Slovaške, Republike Finske, Kraljevine Švedske in Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska za sprejetje sklepa Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropske mreže za preprečevanje kriminala (EUCPN) in razveljavitvi sklepa 2001/427/PNZ
on the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland with a view to the adoption of a Council Decision setting up a European Crime Prevention Network (EUCPN) and repealing Decision 2001/427/JHA
Poročevalka: Sonia Alfano
Rapporteur: Sonia Alfano
– ob upoštevanju pobude Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Češke, Zvezne republike Nemčije, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Republike Madžarske, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Slovaške, Republike Finske, Kraljevine Švedske in Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska (11421/2009),
– having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (11421/2009),
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) in člena 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0109/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7-0109/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7‑0072/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7‑0072/2009 ),
1. zavrne pobudo Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Češke, Zvezne republike Nemčije, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Republike Madžarske, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Slovaške, Republike Finske, Kraljevine Švedske in Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska;
Rejects the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
4. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Češke, Zvezne republike Nemčije, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Republike Madžarske, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Slovaške, Republike Finske, Kraljevine Švedske in Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Evropska mreža za preprečevanje kriminala
European Crime Prevention Network
Evropska mreža za preprečevanje kriminala je bila ustanovljena leta 2001 na podlagi Sklepa Sveta 2001/427/JHA
The European Crime Prevention Network (EUCPN) was set up in 2001 on the basis of Council Decision 2001/427/JHA
2001/427/PNZ: Sklep Sveta z dne 28. maja 2001 o vzpostavitvi Evropske mreže za preprečevanje kriminala, glej
2001/427/JHA: Council Decision of 28 May 2001 setting up a European crime prevention Network, see
V Sklepu je navedeno, da so naloge mreže
The decision states that the EUCPN shall be responsible for:
– pospeševanje sodelovanja, izmenjave informacij in izkušenj na nacionalni in evropski ravni na področju preprečevanja kriminala,
- facilitating cooperation and exchanges of information and experience at national and European level in respect of crime prevention;
– zbiranje in ocenjevanje ustreznih informacij zaradi izmenjave dobrih praks,
- collecting and analysing information on the subject and exchanging best practices;
– organiziranje konferenc, seminarjev, srečanj, pobud in dejavnosti, ki pospešujejo in olajšujejo izmenjavo izkušenj in dobrih praks,
- organising conferences, seminars, meetings and other activities designed to encourage and promote exchanges of experience and best practices;
– zagotavljanje strokovnega znanja Svetu in Komisiji na področju preprečevanja kriminala.
- provide its expertise in the area of crime prevention to the Council and to the Commission.