natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· sklicevanje na konvencijo Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu: sporna uvodna izjava, ki se je nanašala na konvencijo Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu, se je črtala, saj sta tako Parlament kot Komisija menila, da slabi uredbo.
· Reference to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea : A controversial recital referring to UNCLOS was deleted, as both Parliament and the Commission felt this would weaken the Regulation.
· Ocena kakovosti in izdajanje potrdil prek skupnega telesa: to telo se bo obravnavalo kot neodvisni organ za oceno kakovosti in izdajanje spričeval, kar je sporazumna rešitev, ki zadovolji željo Parlamenta, da se poudari neodvisnost organa, in željo Sveta, ki želi prepustiti končno obliko organizacijam.
· Quality assessment and certification via a joint body: The body will be referred to as an "Independent Quality Assessment and Certification Entity", a compromise that both satisfied Parliament's desire to underline the independence of the Entity, and Council's wish that the final form be left to the organisations themselves.
Dogovor, dosežen v spravnem postopku, obravnava bistvena vprašanja, zajeta v predlogih sprememb Parlamenta iz druge obravnave.
The agreement reached at the end of the conciliation procedure includes the main points in the amendments adopted by Parliament at second reading.
Delegacija zato Parlamentu predlaga, naj Parlament v tretji obravnavi skupno besedilo sprejme.
The delegation accordingly recommends that Parliament approves the joint text at third reading.
Skupno besedilo Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij (prenovitev), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations (recast)
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pomorski inšpekciji države pristanišča (prenovitev), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on port State control (recast)
Predsednica delegacije:
Delegation chair
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3721/2008 – C6‑0044/2009 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3721/2008 – C6‑0044/2009 ),
584. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0588 ),
584. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0588 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0466 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(0466)2008 . on the Council common position
UL C 198 E, 05.08.08, str.
OJ C 198 E, 5.8.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2008)0830 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2008)0830 ))
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6‑0099/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0099/2009 ),
S sedmimi predlogi, ki ga sestavljajo, naj bi preprečili nesreče (z večjo kakovostjo evropskih zastav, revizijo predpisov o pomorski inšpekciji in spremljanju ladijskega prometa ter boljšimi pravili za klasifikacijske zavode) in omogočili učinkovit odziv v primeru nesreče (z usklajenim okvirom za preiskavo nesreč, novimi pravili o nadomestilih za potnike v primeru nesreče in novimi pravili o odgovornosti lastnikov ladij in obveznem zavarovanju).
Its seven proposals aim at preventing accidents (by improving the quality of European flags, reviewing the legislation on port state control and vessel traffic monitoring and by improving the rules relating to classification societies) and ensuring an effective response in case of an accident (by developing a harmonised framework for accident investigation, introducing rules on compensation of passengers in case of an accident and by introducing rules on ship-owners' liability coupled with a mandatory insurance scheme).
I.2 Ta predlog
I.2 This proposal
Glavni cilj predloga Komisije je bil pregled obstoječe zakonodaje o pomorski inšpekciji države pristanišča, da bi pojasnili in okrepili njene določbe ter zagotovili učinkovitejšo uporabo sistema nadzora v pristaniščih in sidriščih Evropske unije.
The main aim of the Commission proposal was to review existing legislation on Port State control, with a view to clarification or reinforcement of its provisions and to ensure a more effective application of the system of control in ports and anchorages in the European Union.
V predlogu Komisije je dodanih tudi nekaj novih določb za področja, ki jih pomorska inšpekcija ne pokriva, kot je npr. pomorska varnost, da bi se upošteval nedavni razvoj v mednarodnem pravu in pravu Skupnosti.
The Commission proposal also added a number of provisions, in areas which were not covered by port State control, such as maritime safety, in order to take account of recent developments in international and Community law.
Natančneje je predlog Komisije med drugim vseboval:
More specifically, the Commission proposal included, inter alia:
· vzpostavitev novega sistema inšpekcijskih pregledov,
· the establishment of a new inspection regime;
· podkrepljeno obveznost, da pomorski pilot javlja okvare,
· a reinforced obligation on pilots to report defects;
· razširitev in poenostavitev ukrepov za zavrnjen dostop,
· the extension and simplification of access refusal measures;
· strožje zahteve glede nacionalnih uprav, pristojnih za inšpekcije,
· stricter requirements for national administrations responsible for inspections;
· večjo transparentnost in razširjanje informacij glede ladij in upravljavcev.
· and an increased transparency and wider dissemination of information on ships and operators
Številne določbe, predvsem tiste opisane v prilogah predloga, temeljijo na Pariškem memorandumu o soglasju glede nadzora, ki ga opravlja inšpekcija za varnost plovbe (pariški MoU), ki določa pravni okvir za sodelovanje na mednarodni ravni.
Many provisions, especially those described in the annexes of the proposal, are based on the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control (Paris MoU), which sets out the legal framework for cooperation at international level.
Sočasno so se pogajanja o šestih predlogih v drugi obravnavi nadaljevala brez uspeha.
In parallel negotiations on the six files in 2nd reading continued unsuccessfully.
Usoda „manjkajočih dveh“, pa tudi težave pri nekaterih drugih predlogih so pripeljale do odločitve, da v drugi obravnavi ne bo dogovora o nobenem predlogu.
The fate of the "missing two" as well as difficulties in some files led to a decision not to reach a second reading agreement on any file.
Ta predlog v prvi in drugi obravnavi
This proposal in 1st and 2nd reading
V prvi obravnavi je Parlament sledil splošnim smernicam predloga Komisije, vendar je vložil nekaj predlogov sprememb o:
In its 1st reading, Parliament followed the general lines of the Commission's proposal but introduced a number of amendments on:
· vključitvi temeljitejših in pogostejših inšpekcijskih pregledov za ladje z večjim tveganjem,
· the inclusion of more thorough and frequent inspections for high-risk vessels;
· odstopanju za države članice brez morskih pristanišč pod posebnimi pogoji,
· a derogation for Member States without seaports under specific conditions;
· posebnih določbah o skupnem številu inšpekcijskih pregledov posameznih ladij s strani držav članic,
· specific provisions on the total annual number of inspections of individual ships by Member States;
· oblikovanju inšpekcijske baze podatkov Skupnosti za regije EU in pariškega MoU,
· the establishment of a Community inspection database for both the EU and Paris MoU region;
· uvedbi kazni v državah članicah, ki omogočajo enotno uporabo sistema inšpekcijskih pregledov v vsej Skupnosti.
· and the introduction of penalties by Member States which allow for uniform application of the inspection regime throughout the Community.
Svet je v skupnem stališču uvedel cilj skupnih inšpekcijskih pregledov za celotno Skupnost, ki temelji na pravični delitvi števila inšpekcijskih pregledov med državami članicami, vendar je upošteval tudi praktične težave nekaterih držav članic v smislu finančnih in človeških virov.
The Council in its Common Position introduced a collective inspection objective for the whole Community based on a fair share of the number of inspections among Member States, but took also into account practical difficulties of some Member States in terms of financial and personal resources.
Podstandardne ladje bodo praviloma pregledane pogosteje, da bi zmanjšali breme inšpekcijskih pregledov za kakovostna plovila.
As a general rule, substandard vessels shall be checked more often to reduce the burden of inspections for quality vessels.
Svet je spremenil tudi določbe o zavrnitvi dostopa in črtal možnost trajne prepovedi ter uvedel možnost odprave prepovedi po 36 mesecih v skladu z nekaterimi pogoji.
The Council changed also the provisions on access refusal, deleting the possibility for a permanent ban and introducing the possibility to lift the ban after 36 months under a number of conditions.
Svet je državam članicam dovolil tudi uporabo 36 mesečnega obdobja prenosa za začetek uporabe novega sistema inšpekcijskih pregledov.
Finally, Council allowed Member States to use a transposition period of 36 months to apply the new inspection regime.
V drugi obravnavi je Parlament ponovno vložil večino predlogov sprememb iz prve obravnave, s čimer je okrepil besedilo skupnega stališča Sveta, in nekaj tehničnih predlogov sprememb, da bi se odrazile razprave na ravni Pariškega MoU, kot je bilo dogovorjeno s Komisijo.
In 2nd reading , the Parliament reintroduced most of its first reading agreements, strengthening the Council common position text, and a number of technical amendments to reflect discussions at Paris MOU level as agreed with the Commission.
Po neformalnem srečanju Sveta, kjer so o vprašanju razpravljali ob navzočnosti predsednika odbora TRAN Paola Coste, je bil 9. oktobra 2008 dosežen politični dogovor o obeh predlogih.
Following an informal Council meeting which discussed the issue in the presence of the TRAN Chair Paolo Costa, political agreements were reached on both files on 9.10.2008.
Dogovor o zadnjih nerešenih vprašanjih najtežjega predloga (Paola Coste) je bil dosežen 8. decembra.
Agreement on the last outstanding issues of the most difficult dossier (of Mr. Costa) was reached on 8.12.
Komisijo je zastopal podpredsednik Antonio Tajani.
Vice-President Tajani represented the Commission.
Vseeno pa se je v posebnih okoliščinah pomorskega paketa izkazalo, da ni najbolje, če je isto predsedstvo odgovorno za pogajanja v drugi in tretji obravnavi.
The special circumstances of the Maritime Package showed, however, that it is not an ideal situation when the same Presidency is responsible for negotiations in 2nd and 3rd reading.
III.2 Ta predlog v spravnem postopku
III.2 This proposal in conciliation
· razširitev področja uporabe, da se vključijo tudi ladje, ki pristajajo na sidriščih: Parlament je uspel ponovno uvesti pristajanje na sidriščih (na morju zunaj pristanišč) iz obveznosti glede inšpekcijskih pregledov iz direktive, ki ga je Svet v skupnem stališču izključil,
· Extension of scope to also include vessels calling at anchorages: Parliament managed to reintroduce vessels calling at anchorages (off shore from the port) from the inspection requirements of the Directive, which had been excluded from Council in its Common position.
· trajna prepoved za ladje pod določenimi pogoji : glede zavrnitve dostopa je Svet na koncu sklenil slediti predlogu Parlamenta in ponovno uvesti določbe o trajni prepovedi pod določenimi pogoji.
· Permanent banning of vessels under certain conditions : On access refusal, Council accepted finally to follow Parliament's position and to reintroduce provisions related to permanent banning under specific conditions.
Skupno besedilo Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pomorski inšpekciji države pristanišča (prenovitev), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on port State control (recast)
o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/59/ES o vzpostavitvi sistema spremljanja in obveščanja za ladijski promet, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/59/EC establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3722/2008 – C6‑0045/2009 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3722/2008 – C6‑0045/2009 ),
533. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0589 ),
533. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0589 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0443 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0443 . on the Council common position
UL C 184 E, 22.7.2008, str.
OJ C 184 E, 22.7.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2008)0829 ),
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2008)0829 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6‑0100/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0100/2009 ),
S sedmimi predlogi, ki ga sestavljajo, naj bi preprečili nesreče (z večjo kakovostjo evropskih zastav, revizijo predpisov o pomorski inšpekciji in spremljanjem ladijskega prometa ter boljšimi pravili za klasifikacijske zavode) in omogočili učinkovit odziv v primeru nesreče (z usklajenim okvirom za preiskavo nesreč, novimi pravili o nadomestilih za potnike v primeru nesreče ter novimi pravili o odgovornosti lastnikov ladij in obveznem zavarovanju).
Its seven proposals aim at preventing accidents (by improving the quality of European flags, reviewing the legislation on port state control and vessel traffic monitoring and by improving the rules relating to classification societies) and ensuring an effective response in case of an accident (by developing a harmonised framework for accident investigation, introducing rules on compensation of passengers in case of an accident and by introducing rules on ship-owners' liability coupled with a mandatory insurance scheme).
Cilj predloga je upoštevati tehnološki razvoj pri spremljanju ladij in izboljšati postopke za sprejem ladij v pribežališča. kar je že dolgo politična prioriteta Parlamenta.
Its objective is to reflect technological developments for the monitoring of ships and to improve the procedures for the accommodation of ships in “places of refuge”.
Zaporedne in skorajšnje nesreče so opozorile na to, da je bilo pogosto porabljenega preveč časa, ker ni bilo jasno, kdo je za kaj odgovoren, ali ker so pristojni za sprejemanje odločitev morali čakati na pomoč strokovne skupine, ki je bila pogosto ustanovljena ad hoc .
The successive disasters and near-disasters had shown that much time is often wasted because it was not clear who was responsible for what or because those competent to take a decision had to call on the expertise of a team which often had to be set up on an ad hoc basis.
Zaradi tega se je Parlament v resoluciji, ki jo je pripravil odbor MARE, zavzel za ustanovitev neodvisnih organov, ki bi imeli pooblastila in ustrezno strokovno znanje za sprejem zavezujočih odločitev o pribežališču.
In the resolution prepared by MARE, Parliament had therefore called for independent authorities with the powers and expertise to take binding decisions on a place of refuge.
Prva obravnava vseh sedmih predlogov je bila marca in aprila 2007.
The 1st reading on the seven proposals took place in March/April 2007.
Nazadnje je Parlament na tak potek pristal, da obravnava ne bi obstala v celoti.
Parliament eventually agreed to this approach in order to make progress.
Usoda „manjkajočih dveh“, pa tudi težave pri nekaterih drugih predlogih so pripeljale do odločitve o tem, da v drugi obravnavi ne bo dogovora o nobenem predlogu.
The fate of the "missing two" as well as difficulties in some files led to a decision not to reach a second reading agreement on any file.
Ti so zadevali:
These concerned:
· neodvisne strokovnjake in naloge pristojnih organov pri sprejemu ladij v stiski,
· the independence of experts and the tasks of the authorities responsible for the accommodation of ships in distress;
· izvajanje smernic Mednarodne pomorske organizacije o pravičnem obravnavanju pomorščakov v primeru nezgod,
· the implementation of IMO guidelines for the fair treatment of seafarers in case of an accident;
· sprejem nezavarovanih ladij v pribežališča,
· the obligation to accommodate also uninsured ships in places of refuge;
· informacije, ki jih mora posredovati vkrcevalec za vsako plovilo, za katerega je odgovoren in ki vpluje v evropsko pristanišče,
· the information to be provided by the shipper under his responsibility for every vessel entering a European port;
· povračilo škode pristaniščem in pribežališčem,
· the compensation for ports and places of refuge for damage;
· zahteve po zaupnosti podatkov o prometu.
· confidentiality requirements in respect of traffic data.
Glede obvezne vgradnje identifikacijskih sistemov se je Parlament zavzel za večjo prožnost in predlagal, da se zahteva ne uporablja za plovila, krajša od 24 metrov.
Regarding the obligation to equip fishing vessels with identification systems Parliament sought greater flexibility by excluding vessels of less than 24 metres.
Ker je Svet splošni pristop opredelil že nekaj mesecev pred prvo obravnavo Parlamenta in zato ni upošteval njegovih stališč in predlogov sprememb, poleg tega pa je opustil še številne predloge Komisije, je poročevalec pri drugi obravnavi priporočil praktično polno obnovitev stališča Parlamenta po prvi obravnavi.
Because the Council had adopted its general approach months before the Parliament's 1st reading, and had as a consequence not even considered Parliament’s views and amendments and had, in addition, abandoned a number of Commission proposals, your rapporteur recommended for 2nd reading an almost full return to Parliament’s position in 1st reading.
Precejšen napredek je bil dosežen s pogajanji ob drugi obravnavi, ko je bila rešena večina težav.
Much progress was then made during negotiations in 2nd reading during which most of the problems could be solved.
V središču pozornosti so bila zlasti vprašanja v zvezi s pristojnim organom za sprejetje ladij v stiski v pribežališče.
This concerned, in particular, all the aspects of the authority deciding on the accommodation of ships in distress.
Predlog je šel v spravni postopek s precej manj odprtimi točkami in več predlogi sprememb z navedbo na „manjkajoča dva“ in njuno vsebino.
The dossier then went to conciliation with a limited number of open points and several amendments reinstating references to and content of the "missing two".
Parlament in Svet sta se sešla na dveh tristranskih srečanjih (4. novembra in 2. decembra) in enem neformalnem srečanju, o najtežjih predlogih pa sta razpravljala pred srečanjem spravnega odbora 8. decembra, s katerim so se pogajanja zaključila.
Parliament and Council held two trialogues (on 4.11. and 2.12.) and one informal meeting on the most difficult dossiers to run up to the conciliation committee on 8.12 which concluded the negotiations.
Tega večera je Parlament tudi predsedstvu izročil pisma, v katerih je potrdil svojo pripravljenost za sklenitev dogovora o „manjkajočih dveh“ v zgodnji fazi druge obravnave, kar bi Svetu omogočilo, da svoji skupni stališči sprejme na zasedanju 9. decembra.
On that evening Parliament also gave the Presidency letters confirming its willingness to conclude early 2nd reading agreements on the "missing two" thereby allowing the Council to adopt its two common positions at its meeting on 9.12.
V spravnem odboru je Svet zastopal predsedujoči Svetu in francoski državni sekretar za promet Dominique Bussereau, Komisijo pa podpredsednik Tajani.
At the conciliation committee the Council was represented by Mr. BUSSEREAU, President-in-Office of the Council and Secretary of State for Transport of France.
Ponovno se je izkazalo, da sodelovanje najvišje politične ravni pri zelo težkih pogajanjih in dinamika spravnega večera lahko vplivata na dosego dogovora.
This demonstrated once more that in the case of very difficult negotiations the involvement of the highest political level and the dynamics of a conciliation evening can make a difference in reaching agreement.
Po pogajanjih ob drugi obravnavi so ostala tri odprta vprašanja:
Following the 2nd reading negotiations there were only three outstanding issues:
· povračilo škode pristaniščem za morebitno škodo, če ne morejo sama sprejeti odločitve o tem, ali bodo sprejela ladjo v stiski ali ne, ampak je zanjo pristojen organ, ki odločitve sprejema neodvisno,
· the compensation of ports for potential damage when they loose the decision-making power whether to accommodate a ship in distress or not to an authority taking independent decisions;
· vprašanje, kako ob nesreči zagotoviti pravično obravnavanje pomorščakov, da posadka ladje v stiski nemudoma poišče pomoč ne glede na to, v čigavih ozemeljskih vodah je, in
· the question of how to ensure the fair treatment of seafarers in case of an accident in such a way that the crew of a ship in distress seeks immediate assistance independent of the territorial waters they are in; and
· kakšne količine goriv ni treba prijaviti.
· the amount of bunker oil which would not have to be declared.
Glavne točke dogovora
Key points of the agreement reached
· Imenovanje neodvisnega pristojnega organa
· Designation of an independent competent authority
Parlamentu je uspelo Svet prepričati v jasnejšo definicijo pristojnega organa za sprejem odločitve ob nesreči.
Parliament succeeded in convincing Council to clarify the definition of the authority competent to take decisions in case of a disaster.
Poročevalec Parlamenta od držav članic ni zahteval, naj povsem opustijo svoje notranje strukture, pač pa je želel, da bi pristojni organ imel potrebno neodvisno (pomorsko) strokovno znanje, da bi se lahko neodvisno odločil o najustreznejšem ukrepanju, da se nesreča prepreči ali se vsaj v kar največji meri omejijo njene posledice.
Your rapporteur did not require the Member State to abandon totally their internal structure, but wanted to ensure that the competent authority has the necessary independent (maritime) expertise to be able to decide independently on the best course of action to avoid or limit a disaster as far as possible.
Pri tem je bilo pomembno vztrajanje, da bi bil organ stalen.
The permanent character of the authority was in that respect an important element.
· Koncept ladje, ki potrebuje pomoč, v nasprotju z ladjo v stiski
· The concept of a ship in need of assistance as opposed to a ship in distress
Komisija, ki jo je podprl Parlament, je uporabila izraz „ladja v stiski“.
The Commission, supported by the Parliament, used the expression ‘ship in distress’.
Izhajajoč iz smernic Mednarodne pomorske organizacije glede sprejema ladij, ki potrebujejo pomoč, je Svet uporabil izraz „ladje, ki potrebujejo pomoč“.
Basing itself on IMO guidelines for the accommodation of ships in need of assistance, the Council used the expression ‘ship in need of assistance’.
Poročevalec se je sicer s Svetom strinjal, a ni bil zadovoljen z njegovo opredelitvijo, ki naj ne bi upoštevala pomena človeških življenj pri sprejemu ladij v težavah.
Your rapporteur could agree with the Council but was dissatisfied with the Council’s definition, which appeared to disregard the importance of human lives in accommodating ships in difficulties.