natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Letno pregledovanje vsakega posebej bi zahtevalo poln delavni čas organa za etično presojo in toliko časa, da dogovorjeni člani tega organa ne bi mogli izpolnjevati glavnih nalog – kar bi negativno vplivalo na dobro počutje živali in znanost.
To review each one every year would be a full-time task for the ethical review body, requiring so much time that the stipulated members of that body would be unable to carry out their main jobs – which would have a harmful effect both on animal welfare and science.
Člen 26 – odstavek 1 – točka d – alinea 2 a (novo)
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point d – indent 2a (nouveau)
– znanstveni napredek projekta
- the scientific progress of the project
Države članice zagotovijo, da se hranijo zapisi o vseh nasvetih, ki jih je stalni odbor za etično presojo dal enoti, in odločitve v zvezi s temi nasveti.
Member States shall ensure that the records of any advice given to the establishment by the permanent ethical review body and decisions taken regarding that advice are kept.
Zapisi se na zahtevo predložijo pristojnemu organu.
The records shall be submitted to the competent authority upon request.
Zapisi so na zahtevo razpoložljivi pristojnemu organu.
The records shall be made available to the competent authority upon request.
Države članice so zlasti pozorne pri zbiranju, primerjanju in objavljanju evidenc, povezanih s projekti z oznako „hudi“ ali s projekti na primatih razen človeka, da bi zagotovile informacije, ki lahko izboljšajo dobro počutje živali in spodbudijo izpolnjevanje načela nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja.
Member States shall pay particular attention to the collection, collation and publication of records relating to projects classified as " severe " or those on non-human primates in order to provide information which can improve animal welfare and further the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement .
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo enote za vzrejo in dobavo primatov razen človeka vzpostavljeno strategijo za povečevanje deleža živali, ki so potomke primatov razen človeka, vzrejenih v ujetništvu.
Member States shall ensure that breeding and supplying establishments of non-human primates have a strategy in place for increasing the proportion of animals that are the offspring of non-human primates that have been bred in captivity.
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo enote za vzrejo in dobavo primatov razen človeka v EU vzpostavljeno strategijo za povečevanje deleža živali, ki so potomke primatov razen človeka, vzrejenih v ujetništvu.
Member States shall ensure that EU breeding and supplying establishments of non-human primates have a strategy in place for increasing the proportion of animals that are the offspring of non-human primates that have been bred in captivity.
Kadar je odobrena uporaba primatov razen človeka, Komisija in države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev ustreznih pogojev pri prevozu.
Where the use of non-human primates is authori s ed, the Commission and the Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure appropriate transport conditions.
EU nima pristojnosti za nadzorovanje dobaviteljev izven EU.
The EU has no jurisdiction to control non-EU suppliers.
Poleg tega lahko prevoz primatov razen ljudi vzbudi skrbi; zato mora Evropska unija podpirati prevoz zadevnih vrst v najugodnejših pogojih.
In addition the transport of non-human primates can raise concerns; therefore the European Union should bring its support to the transport, in optimal conditions of concerned species.
Poleg tega bi skupna strategija za zagotavljanje potrebnega razvoja primatov razen ljudi na evropskem ozemlju povečala učinkovitost te direktive.
Moreover, a common strategy to ensure an indispensable development of non-human primates on the European territory would a plus of efficiency for this text.
Enote, ki pridobivajo primate razen človeka, pristojnemu organu na zahtevo predložijo dokaze, da ima enota, iz katere so bile živali pridobljene, vzpostavljeno strategijo za vzrejo.
Establishments acquiring non-human primates shall supply proof to the competent authority, on request, that the establishment from which animals have been acquired have a breeding strategy in place.
Enote EU , ki pridobivajo primate razen človeka, pristojnemu organu na zahtevo predložijo dokaze, da ima enota, iz katere so bile živali pridobljene, vzpostavljeno strategijo za vzrejo.
EU establishments acquiring non-human primates shall supply proof to the competent authority, on request, that the establishment from which animals have been acquired have a breeding strategy in place.
Člen 29 – odstavek 1 – uvodni del
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Države članice zagotovijo, da vse vzrejne, dobavne in uporabniške enote hranijo dokumentacijo o:.
Member States shall ensure that all breeding, supplying and user establishments keep records of the following:
Države članice , kjer je to mogoče, zagotovijo, da vse vzrejne, dobavne in uporabniške enote hranijo dokumentacijo o:
Member States shall where possible ensure that all breeding, supplying and user establishments keep records of the following:
To bi bilo precej težko za vsako žival, na primer pri glodavcih.
Quite difficult for each animal, in the case of rodents, for instance.
Člen 29 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) številu in vrstah živali , ki so bile vzrejene , pridobljene , dobavljene , spuščene ali znova nastanjene v domovih;
(a) the number and the species of animals bred, acquired, supplied, released or re-homed;
(a) številu in vrstah vretenčarjev , ki so bili vzrejeni , pridobljeni , dobavljeni , spuščeni ali znova nastanjeni v domovih;
(a) the number and the species of vertebrate animals bred, acquired, supplied, released or re-homed;
Nemogoče bi bilo vključiti vse spolno zrele in nezrele nevretenčarje ustreznih redov.
The inclusion of all mature and immature invertebrates of the relevant orders would be simply impossible to fulfil.
Člen 29 – odstavek 1 – točka (e)
Article 29 – paragraph 1 –point e
(e) imenu in naslovu prejemnika živali;
(e) the name and address of the recipient of animals;
(e) imenu in naslovu enote, ki prejme živali;
(e) the name and address of the the establishment receiving the animals;
Člen 30 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Vsak primat ima osebno kartoteko o zgodovini, v kateri živali se sledi skozi vse njeno življenje.
Each non-human primate shall have an individual history file, which follows the animal throughout its life.
Vsak pes, mačka in primat ima osebno kartoteko o zgodovini, v kateri se živali sledi skozi vse njeno življenje.
Each dog, cat and non-human primate shall have an individual history file, which follows the animal throughout its life.
Države članice morajo zagotoviti primerno in skladno izvajanje te direktive.
The Member States must ensure the adequa te and consisten t implementation of this Directive.
Člen 30 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 2
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Kartoteka se ustvari ob rojstvu in vsebuje podrobne reproduktivne, medicinske in socialne podatke o posamezni živali.
The file shall be established at birth and shall cover detailed reproductive, medical and social information on the individual animal.
Kartoteka se ustvari ob rojstvu in vsebuje vse pomembne reproduktivne, medicinske in socialne podatke o posamezni živali.
The file shall be established at birth and shall cover any relevant reproductive, medical and social information on the individual animal.
Člen 32 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) vse živali imajo zagotovljeno namestitev, okolje, vsaj nekaj svobode gibanja, hrano, vodo in oskrbo, ki so primerne njihovemu zdravju in dobremu počutju;
(a) all animals are provided with accommodation, an environment, at least some freedom of movement, food, water and care which are appropriate to their health and well-being;
(a) vse živali imajo zagotovljeno namestitev, okolje, svobodo gibanja, hrano, vodo in oskrbo, ki so primerne njihovemu zdravju in dobremu počutju in ki jim omogočajo, da zadovoljijo svoje etološke in telesne potrebe ;
(a) all animals are provided with accommodation, an environment, freedom of movement, food, water and care which are appropriate to their health and well-being and which allow them to satisfy their ethological as well as physical needs ;
Člen 32 – odstavek 1 – točka (d)
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) dobro počutje in zdravstveno stanje živali nadzoruje pristojna oseba, da se preprečijo bolečine ali trpljenje, stiska ali trajne poškodbe, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti;
(d) the well-being and state of health of animals are observed by a competent person to prevent pain or avoidable suffering, distress or lasting harm;
(d) dobro počutje in zdravstveno stanje živali vsaj enkrat dnevno nadzoruje pristojna oseba, da se preprečijo bolečine ali trpljenje, stiska ali trajne poškodbe, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti;
(d) the well-being and state of health of animals are observed by a competent person at least once a day to prevent pain or avoidable suffering, distress or lasting harm;
Člen 32 – odstavek 1 – točka (e)
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) zagotovi se, da se morebitne odkrite napake ali trpljenje kar najhitreje odpravijo.
(e) arrangements are made to ensure that any defect or suffering discovered is eliminated as quickly as possible.
(e) zagotovi se, da se morebitne odkrite napake ali trpljenje , ki jih je mogoče preprečiti, kar najhitreje odpravijo.
(e) arrangements are made to ensure that any avoidable defect or suffering discovered is eliminated as quickly as possible.
Države članice lahko zaradi dobrega počutja živali dovolijo izjeme od določb odstavka 2.
Member States may allow exemptions to paragraph 2 for animal welfare reasons.
Države članice lahko zaradi dobrega počutja živali ter upravičenih znanstvenih ali veterinarskih razlogov dovolijo izjeme od določb odstavka 2.
Member States may allow exemptions to paragraph 2 for justified scientific reasons, veterinary reasons or animal welfare reasons.
Odstopanja od odstavka 2 so možna zaradi dobrega počutja živali, pa tudi zaradi znanstvenih in/ali veterinarskih razlogov.
The exemptions to paragraph 2 must be assessed with regard not only to animal welfare considerations but also to scientific and/or veterinary reasons.
Člen 33 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Nacionalne preglede izvaja pristojni organ najmanj dvakrat na leto.
National inspections shall be carried out by the competent authority at least twice a year.
Nacionalne preglede izvaja pristojni organ povprečno enkrat na leto , pri čemer pristojni organ prilagodi pogostost pregledov analizi tveganja za vsako enoto .
National inspections shall be carried out by the competent authority on average once a year , with the competent authority adapting the frequency of inspection on the basis of a risk analysis for each establishment .
Obveznost dveh pregledov na leto v posamezni enoti, od katerih je eden nenapovedan, ni niti izvedljiva niti zaželena.
The obligation to have establishments inspected twice a year, one of which would be unannounced, is neither feasible nor desirable.
Kot na drugih področjih pregledov je primerneje zahtevati, naj pristojni organ prilagodi pogostost pregledov analizi tveganja.
As in other areas of inspection, it would be more appropriate to require the competent authority to adapt the frequency of inspection on the basis of a risk analysis.
Države članice zagotovijo, da sta pogostost in obseg pregledov primerna glede na število in vrsto nastanjenih živali, spoštovanje te direktive v enoti v preteklosti ter pri uporabniški enoti glede na število in vrste projektov, ki se izvajajo v teh enotah.
Member States shall ensure that the frequency and the extent of inspections are adequate to the number and species of animals housed, to the compliance record of the establishment with this Directive and, in the case of user establishments, to the number and types of projects carried out in those establishments.
Države članice sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe, zato da inšpekcije ne ogrozijo znanstvene kakovosti projektov in dobrega počutja živali ter da ne potekajo v pogojih, ki niso v skladu z drugimi veljavnimi predpisi.
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the inspections do not jeopardise the scientific quality of the projects and the welfare of the animals, and do not take place under conditions that fail to comply with the other regulations in force.
Dokumentacija o vseh pregledih se hrani najmanj pet let.
Records of all inspections shall be kept for at least five years.
Poleg tega pristojni organ vsake države članice hrani dokumentacijo o pregledih, vključno z dokumentacijo o kakršnem koli nespoštovanju zahtev iz te direktive.
In addition , inspection records shall be kept by each Member S tate's competent authority , including records detailing any failure to meet the requirements of this Directive.
Komisija lahko nadzoruje infrastrukturo in delovanje nacionalnih pregledov v državah članicah.
The Commission may undertake controls of the infrastructure and operation of national inspections in Member States.
Komisija lahko nadzoruje infrastrukturo in delovanje nacionalnih pregledov v državah članicah ter zagotovi, da se razvrščanje glede na težo posledic postopkov pravilno in enotno izvaja na celotnem ozemlju EU .
The Commission may undertake controls of the infrastructure and operation of national inspections in Member States and to ensure that severity classifications are applied correctly and uniformly with in the territory of the EU .
Pregledana direktiva mora vsebovati načeli preglednosti in odgovornosti.
The revised Directive must enshrine the principles of transparency and accountability.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se projekti ne izvajajo brez predhodne odobritve pristojnega organa.
Member States shall ensure that projects are not carried out without a prior authorisation by the competent authority.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se projekti z oznako „hudi“ ali projekti, ki vključujejo primate razen človeka, ne izvajajo brez predhodne odobritve pristojnega organa.
Member States shall ensure that projects classified as “severe” or any projects involving non-human primates are not carried out without a prior authorisation by the competent authority.
Pristojni organ je po etični presoji stalnega organa za etično presojo ustanove vnaprej obveščen o vseh drugih projektih.
All other projects shall be notified in advance to the competent authority following ethical review by the institution's permanent ethical review body.
Predhodna odobritev bi morala biti omejena samo na projekte z resnejšimi oznakami glede na težo posledic ali projekte s primati razen človeka.
Prior authorisation should be restricted to projects involving higher severity classifications or NHP.
Člen 35 – odstavek 2
Article 35 – paragraph 2
Za izdajo odobritve je potrebna ugodna etična ocena pristojnega organa.
Granting of authorisation shall be subject to favourable ethical evaluation by the competent authority.
Za izdajo odobritve je potrebna ugodna neodvisna etična in znanstvena ocena pristojnega organa.
Granting of authorisation shall be subject to favourable independent ethical and scientific evaluation by the competent authority.
Znanstvena in etična utemeljitev projekta sta tesno povezani, tako da organ za presojo ne more ustrezno oceniti etičnih vidikov brez znanstvenih.
The scientific justification and ethical justification for a project are so closely linked that a review body could not properly and evaluate the ethical considerations without the scientific considerations.
Zato je pomembno, da ima organ za presojo strokovno znanje na obeh področjih ter ju obravnava skupaj.
It is important therefore that the review body have expertise in both areas and considers both jointly.
Člen 36 – odstavek 1 – uvodni del
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Uporabniška enota predloži vlogo za odobritev projekta, ki vključuje:
The user establishment shall submit an application for the project authorisation, which shall include the following:
Uporabniška enota ali oseba, ki je znanstveno odgovorna za projekt, na zahtevo predloži vlogo za odobritev projekta, ki vključuje:
When required , the user establishment or the person scientifically responsible for the project shall submit an application for the project authorisation, which shall include the following:
Predlog Komisije ni primeren za akademsko raziskovanje, kjer večino projektov izvajajo splošne enote in znanstveniki, odvisni od vrste različnih ustanov.
The proposal of the commission does not fit for academic research where most projects are performed in common establishments by scientists depending from an array of different institutions.
Za razliko od industrije enota ni nujno odvisna od istega organa.
In contrasts to what happens in industry, the establishment does not necessary depend on the same authority.
Poleg tega se zaradi tehničnih razlogov veliko projektov izvaja v različnih enotah.
In addition many projects are performed, for technical reasons in different establishments.
Člen 36 – odstavek 1 – točka (c a) (novo)
Article 36 –paragraph 1 – point ca (new)
(ca) znanstveno utemeljeno obrazložitev, da je raziskovalni projekt nujen in etično sprejemljiv ter da njegovega namena ni mogoče doseči z drugimi metodami ali postopki.
(ca) a scientifically justified statement that the research project is indispensable and ethically defensible and that the purposes of the project cannot be achieved using other methods or procedures.
Te informacije so bistvene za preučitev vloge za odobritev.
This information is essential in order to examine the application for authorisation.
(a) projekt je znanstveno utemeljen ali pa se zahteva z zakonodajo ;
(a) the project is scientifically justified or required by law;
(a) projekt je znanstveno utemeljen , nujen in etično sprejemljiv ;
(a) the project is scientifically justified , indispensable and ethically defensible ;
Etično presojo je treba opraviti pred odobritvijo projekta, s čimer bi zagotovili, da se poskusi na živalih izvajajo samo, če so nujno potrebni, etično sprejemljivi in so edina možnost.
In order to ensure that animal experiments are conducted only if they are indispensable, ethically defensible and represent the only alternative, there must be an ethical evaluation prior to a project being authorised.
Države članice bi morale biti odgovorne za pripravo podrobnosti pri postopkih.
Member States should be responsible for drawing up the procedural details.
Člen 37 – odstavek 1 – točka b
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) nameni projekta upravičujejo uporabo živali;
(b) the purposes of the project justify the use of animals;
(b) nameni projekta upravičujejo uporabo živali in jih ni mogoče doseči z drugimi metodami ali postopki ;
(b) the purposes of the project justify the use of animals and cannot be achieved through other methods or procedures ;
Člen 37 – odstavek 1 – točka c
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point c
(g) projekt je zasnovan tako, da omogoča najbolj humano in okoljsko občutljivo izvajanje postopkov .
( g) the project is designed so as to enable procedures to be carried out in the most humane and environmentally sensitive manner.
(c) projekt je zasnovan tako, da se pri izvajanju postopkov v največji možni meri upoštevajo zaščita živali in okoljski vidiki .
(c) the project is designed so as to enable procedures to be carried out with maximum respect for animal welfare and in the most environmentally sensitive manner.
Člen 37 – odstavek 2 – točka (d)
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) analizo škode in koristi projekta, da se oceni, ali škodo, povzročeno živalim s trpljenjem, bolečino in stisko, ter kadar je to ustrezno, okolju upravičijo pričakovani napredek znanosti, ki nazadnje koristi ljudem, živalim ali okolju;
(d) a harm-benefit analysis of the project, to assess whether the harm to the animals in terms of suffering, pain and distress, and to the environment, where appropriate, is justified by the expected advancement of science that ultimately benefits human beings, animals or the environment;
(d) analizo škode in koristi projekta, da se oceni, ali je škoda , povzročeno živalim s trpljenjem, bolečino in stisko, ter kadar je to ustrezno, okolju , etično sprejemljiva glede na pričakovani napredek znanosti, ki lahko nazadnje koristi ljudem, živalim ali okolju;
(d) a harm-benefit analysis of the project, to assess whether the harm to the animals in terms of suffering, pain and distress, and to the environment, where appropriate, is ethically defensible in light of the expected advancement of science that may ultimately benefit human beings, animals or the environment;
Analiza škode in koristi na podlagi objektivnih, znanstveno priznanih meril ni izvedljiva in ne upošteva narave znanosti.
It is impossible to carry out a harm-benefit analysis on the basis of objective, scientifically recognised criteria, and such a requirement disregards the nature of science.
Z znanstvenimi poskusi pridobljenega znanja se ne da predhodno napovedati, saj se je v preteklosti pokazalo, da se določeni rezultati šele čez nekaj let izkažejo za koristne pri razvoju posebnih uporab za človeka, živali ali okolje.
The knowledge gained from a scientific experiment cannot be foreseen in advance, and history shows that in many cases the usefulness of certain results for the development of specific applications for human beings, animals or the environment does not become clear until years later.
Pri etičnem vrednotenju je zato treba preveriti etično sprejemljivost.
The ethical assessment should therefore examine whether the project is ethically defensible.
Člen 37 – odstavek 3 – uvodni stavek
Article 37 – paragraph 3 – introductory sentence
Pristojni organ, ki izvaja etično vrednotenje, vključi strokovnjake zlasti z naslednjih področij:
The competent authority carrying out the ethical evaluation shall consider experts in particular in the following areas:
Pristojni organ, ki izvaja etično vrednotenje, vključi ustrezno strokovno znanje zlasti z naslednjih področij:
The competent authority carrying out the ethical evaluation shall consider corresponding expertise in particular in the following areas:
Etično vrednotenje bi moralo temeljiti na neodvisnem strokovnem znanju.
The ethical evaluation should draw on independent expertise.
Sedanji predlog Komisije ne upošteva, da bi lahko bilo to strokovno znanje na voljo tudi v Odboru za etiko in da je treba zagotoviti zaupnost ustreznih informacij.
So far, the Commission proposal does not take into account the fact that this expertise may also be available within the Committee on Ethics and that the confidentiality of the corresponding information must be guaranteed.
Etièno vrednotenje se izvaja pregledno z vkljuèevanjem mnenj neodvisnih strani .
Ethical evaluation shall be performed in a transparent manner , by integrating the opinion of independent parties .
Etièno vrednotenje se izvaja pregledno z vkljuèevanjem neodvisnega strokovnega znanja, ob varovanju intelektualne lastnine in zaupnih informacij ter varnosti za blago in ljudi .
Ethical evaluation shall be performed in a transparent manner by integrating independent expertise whilst safeguarding intellectual property and confidential information as well as the safety of goods and persons .
Člen 38 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Z etičnim vrednotenjem na podlagi analize škode in koristi iz točke (d) člena 37(2) se določi, ali naj pristojni organ naknadno oceni projekt, ko je končan.
The ethical evaluation shall determine, on the basis of the harm-benefit analysis referred to in point (d) of Article 37(2), whether the project should, once it has been completed, be assessed retrospectively by the competent authority .
Pristojni organ, ki izvaja etično vrednotenje, na podlagi analize škode in koristi iz točke (d) člena 37(2) določi, ali je treba naknadno oceniti projekt, ko je končan.
The competent authority carrying out the ethical evaluation shall determine, on the basis of the harm-benefit analysis referred to in point (d) of Article 37(2), whether the project should, once it has been completed, be assessed retrospectively.