natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Lizbonska pogodba v primerjavi s sedanjimi pogodbami vključuje veliko pomembnih sprememb in izboljšav.
The Treaty of Lisbon incorporates a large number of significant reforms and improvements to the current Treaties.
Ponovna uporaba tradicionalne revizije pogodb in opustitev ideje o ustavi
The return to the traditional approach of revising Treaties and the abandonment of the idea of a Constitution
S ponovno uporabo tradicionalne metode za revizijo pogodb, ko se sprejme nova pogodba, ki uvaja spremembe sedanjih, še vedno veljavnih, pogodb, je bila opuščena ideja o ustavi in torej eni sami konsolidirani pogodbi, ki bi v celoti nadomestila sedanje pogodbe.
The return to the traditional method of revising the Treaties, through the adoption of a new Treaty amending the current Treaties, which themselves remain in force, implies the abandonment of the Constitution as a single, consolidated Treaty which would replace the current Treaties in their entirety.
Tako je vprašanje, ali gre dejansko za ustavo ali pogodbo, ki je bilo v zadnjih letih tako sporno, postalo brezpredmetno.
As a result, the question which has proved so controversial, that of whether the document was really a Constitution or a Treaty, is no longer relevant.
S tem se izognemo brezplodni razpravi o vprašanju, ki to sploh ni: nikoli ni bilo dvoma o tem, da je formalno to pogodba, ki bo sprejeta in ratificirana po pravilih, ki veljajo za spreminjanje pogodb.
A sterile debate on an issue which is nothing more than a red herring has thus been avoided: there was never any doubt that, in formal terms, the document was a Treaty which would have to be adopted and ratified in accordance with the rules in force governing the revision of Treaties.
Drugače tudi ne bi moglo biti.
There was no other possible procedure.
Vendar je res tudi, da je bila ustavna pogodba zaradi svoje narave in vsebine bolj nedvoumno „ustavodajna“.
However, it is also true that, by virtue of its nature and substance, the Constitutional Treaty established a more recognisable ‘constitution’.
S ponovno uporabo tradicionalne metode se opušča poimenovanje „ustava“, kar politično odpravlja sporno vprašanje.
The return to the traditional method involves the abandonment of the very term 'Constitution', so that the controversy has been settled politically.
Ta pristop pomeni tudi, da se odpravlja enotnost besedila in se zavrača tudi zamisel enotnega besedila ustavne narave, ki jo mnogi obravnavajo kot preveč povezano z državnostjo, da bi se lahko uporabljala v Uniji.
This approach also involves a splitting of the text and a rejection of the very idea of a single text of a constitutional nature, one which some regarded as being too close to State practice to be applicable to the Union.
Kljub temu nova pogodba v veliki meri pojasnjuje opredelitev vrednot, načel in ciljev, ki vodijo dejavnost Evropske unije (EU), opisuje pristojnosti Unije, vzpostavlja njene institucije, predstavlja postopke odločanja, natančno določa akte, opredeljuje pravice državljanov v odnosu do EU in med drugim predvideva pravila za svojo revizijo.
However, the new Treaty substantially clarifies the definition of the values, principles and objectives which guide the actions of the European Union (EU); it describes the Union’s competences; it lays down what institutions the EU will have, outlines its decision-making procedures, and stipulates what form its acts will take; it defines citizens' rights vis-à-vis the EU; it lays down the rules governing its own revision, etc.
V tem smislu bi lahko rekli, da pogodbe, na katerih temelji Unija, skupaj sestavljajo nekakšno „ustavo“, saj opredeljujejo ustroj Unije.
In that respect, it could be said that the Treaties on which the Union is founded in some way establish its 'constitution', taking the word 'constitution' in its material sense.
Končno je vloga ustave prav določiti pogoje in meje izvrševanja oblasti znotraj političnega subjekta in državljanom jamčiti pravice, kar je tudi vloga nove pogodbe.
After all, the role of a constitution is precisely that of laying down the conditions governing, and the limits to, the exercise of power in the context of a political entity and safeguarding citizens’ rights, something which the new Treaty does.
Vendar dejstvo, da je bil poskus formalno opredeliti ustroj Unije zavrnjen, pomeni, da Uniji nismo želeli dodeliti „ustave“ v formalnem ali slovesnem smislu, torej v najpogostejšem političnem smislu.
However, the very fact that the attempt to give that material concept practical form was rejected signifies that there was no desire to endow the Union with a ‘Constitution’ in the formal sense, i.e. the most commonly used political sense, of the term.
To je torej bistvena razlika v primerjavi z ustavno pogodbo.
This represents a difference by comparison with the Constitutional Treaty.
Ko pogodbe poenostavimo in jim damo razumljivejšo strukturo, naredimo pomemben korak k razjasnitvi sistema, ki v očeh državljana postane preglednejši in razumljivejši.
By simplifying those Treaties, by giving them a more readily comprehensible structure, a vital step has been taken towards clarifying the system and making it more transparent and understandable for the public.
Vendar postane zaradi izbrane metode, pogodbe, ki vključuje spremembe dveh veljavnih pogodb, besedilo za državljane neberljivo.
However, the method chosen – a Treaty containing amendments to the two Treaties in force – makes the text unreadable for ordinary citizens.
Nujno je pripraviti prečiščeno besedilo.
A consolidated version is now a necessity.
Očitno je, da so države članice želele odpraviti tudi najbolj neutemeljene dvome, da bi sprejetje ustave za Unijo pomenilo začetek nastajanja centralizirane „naddržave“ in s tem neizogiben konec nacionalnih držav, kar bi spremenilo naravo Evropske unije.
It is clear, therefore, that the Member States wanted to dispel any fear, however unfounded, that endowing the Union with a Constitution would represent the first step towards the creation of a centralised 'superstate' which would inevitably sound the death knell for national States and change the nature of the European Union.
Parlament, ki si je od začetka postopka prizadeval za „konstitucionalizacijo“ Unije, se zaveda, da ti dvomi dejansko ne upoštevajo pomena ustave kot temeljnega akta, ki ureja izvajanje oblasti v celotnem političnem subjektu (razen če se želi zanikati „politična“ narava Unije).
Parliament, which has been campaigning from the start of the process for the 'constitutionalisation' of the Union, is aware of the fact that this fear fails to take proper account of the significance of a constitution as a fundamental act governing the exercise of power in a political entity (unless the aim is to deny the 'political' nature of the Union).
Veliko je primerov mednarodnih organizacij, katerih ustanovne listine se imenujejo ustave, kot v primeru Mednarodne organizacije dela, Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije ali Svetovne poštne zveze.
Moreover, there are many examples of international organisations whose constituent act is rightly termed a constitution, including the International Labour Organisation (ILO), the World Health Organisation (WHO), or the Universal Postal Union (UPU).
Tako zasnovan pojem „ustave“ pomeni tudi uradno jamstvo za države članice in državljane pred morebitnimi napakami pri dejavnostih Unije.
Seen in this way, a 'constitution' could even be said to offer the Member States and Union citizens formal safeguards against unwelcome Union action.
Tako lahko Evropski parlament kljub priznanju, da je zaradi političnega položaja v državah članicah prav to pomenilo izhod iz institucionalne slepe ulice, le obžaluje opuščanje ustavnega pristopa.
On that basis, whilst acknowledging that the political situation in the Member States made such a step the only way out of the institutional impasse which had been reached, the EP can only regret the abandonment of the constitutional approach.
Soporočevalca prav tako obžalujeta, da simboli Unije (zastava, himna, geslo, euro in dan Evrope), navedeni v ustavni pogodbi, niso našli mesta v novi pogodbi.
By the same token, your co-rapporteurs can only deplore the fact that the new Treaty makes no reference to symbols of the Union – the flag, the anthem, the motto, the euro, and Europe Day – as the Constitutional Treaty did.
Čeprav to ne pomeni, da simboli ne obstajajo več – obstajali so že dolgo pred tem, a nikoli niso bili kot taki navedeni v pogodbah, in tako bodo obstajali tudi v prihodnje – pa bi bilo povsem logično, da jih omenjajo besedila, ki opredeljujejo pravno-politični status Unije.
Although this does not mean that these symbols no longer exist – they had already existed for a long time without ever being mentioned as such in the Treaties and will continue to exist in the same way – it would only be logical for texts which define the legal and political status of the Union to refer to them.
Njihovo opustitev so zahtevale nekatere države članice, češ da bi priznanje simbolov v pogodbah lahko vodilo v zmotno mišljenje o „državnem“ značaju Unije.
This abandonment of the symbols was forced through by certain Member States on the pretext that recognising them in the Treaties would enable people to claim erroneously that the Union was in fact a 'State-like' structure.
Soporočevalca zato z velikim zadovoljstvom sprejemata pobudo Odbora za ustavne zadeve, ki pripravlja poročilo o uporabi simbolov Unije s predlogi sprememb poslovnika EP, s katerimi bi Parlament te simbole uporabljal v večji meri.
Accordingly, your co-rapporteurs can only welcome with enthusiasm the initiative taken by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, which is in the process of preparing a report on the use of the Union's symbols which will propose changes to Parliament's Rules of Procedure designed to ensure that Parliament makes more systematic use of those symbols
Kljub ohranjanju dveh ločenih pogodb je v smislu preglednosti in razumevanja evropske realnosti pri državljanih zelo pomemben napredek združitev različnih subjektov, ki se delno prekrivajo (Evropska unija, Evropska skupnost), v en subjekt, Evropsko unijo
Despite the retention of two separate Treaties, a crucial step forward, in terms of transparency and understanding by citizens of the nature of the European project, has been taken by merging several overlapping entities (European Union, European Community) into a single entity, the European Union
Nova pogodba ne zadeva Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo (Euratom), ki vzporedno še vedno velja, čeprav protokol o spremembi pogodbe Euratom spreminja nekatere njene določbe, da bi se ujemale z novim besedilom.
The Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC/Euratom) will not be affected by the new Treaty, however, and will thus remain in force in parallel, although some of its provisions are altered by the Protocol amending the Euratom Treaty in order to bring them into line with the new text.
Vendar so Nemčija, Irska in Avstrija v izjavi št. 54 priloge sklepne listine medvladne konference izrazile željo za čim hitrejši sklic medvladne konference za revizijo pogodbe Euratom.
However, Germany, Ireland and Austria have expressed the wish, in Declaration No 54 annexed to the Final Act of the IGC, that an Intergovernmental Conference should be convened as quickly as possible to revise the Euratom Treaty.
Formalno morajo te protokole ratificirati tudi vse države članice in imajo enako pravno moč kot pogodba.
Since they have the same legal force as the Treaty, these protocols must also be ratified by all the Member States.
Nasprotno pa izjave niso pravno obvezujoče in ni potrebno, da jih ratificirajo države članice, lahko pa se uporabijo za razlago pogodb. , ki se ji dodeli status pravne osebe.
The same is not true of the declarations, which are not legally binding, but which may be used as aids to interpreting the Treaties. , endowed with legal personality.
To bi povečalo tudi učinkovitost in preglednost delovanja Unije na mednarodnem področju z odpravljanjem nejasnih okoliščin, v katerih Evropsko unijo vsi priznavajo kot skupen subjekt, medtem ko ima Evropska skupnost, ki zajema le del funkcij Unije, status pravne osebe
This will also increase the effectiveness and visibility of Union action in the international arena, bringing an end to a confusing situation in which the European Union is universally recognised as the common entity, whereas it is the European Community, which covers only some of the Union's functions, which has explicit legal personality
Čeprav je sporno, ali Evropska unija nima statusa mednarodne pravne osebnosti, ne glede na to, da ji je pogodbe ne dodeljujejo. .
Although it could be argued that the European Union as such has international legal personality, even though this is not conferred on it by the Treaties. .
To pomeni tudi, da Pogodba o Evropski skupnosti zdaj postaja Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije.
A further result is that the Treaty establishing the European Community now becomes the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Tako se obe pogodbi zdaj nanašata na isti politični subjekt: Evropsko unijo.
The two Treaties thus now serve the same political entity: the European Union.
Prva pogodba se osredotoča na načela, vrednote in temeljne organizacijske vidike Unije.
The first focuses on the principles, values and fundamental organisational aspects of the Union.
Druga pogodba podrobno obravnava organizacijo in delovanje Unije ter opredeljuje načela in cilje, ki vodijo delovanje Unije v vsaki od njenih sektorskih politik s podrobno opredelitvijo obsega in omejitev pristojnosti Unije na vsakem od njenih področij delovanja.
The second deals with the nuts and bolts of organisation and functioning of the Union and the definition of the principles and objectives which guide Union action in the area of each of its sectoral policies, specifying in detail the scope of and limits to the Union's competences in each of its areas of action.
Izjema, ki dejansko pomeni znatno odstopanje od logike ločevanja obeh pogodb, je dejstvo, da Pogodba o Evropski uniji vključuje celotno poglavje o zunanjem delovanju Unije, ki podrobno obravnava vse v zvezi s skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko.
The exception, which represents a major break with the logic of the separation between the two Treaties, stems from the fact that the TEU contains an entire title dealing with the Union's external action, which deals in detail with every aspect of the common foreign and security policy.
Združevanje v en subjekt spremlja odprava strukture treh stebrov [skupna zunanja in varnostna politika, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in Evropska skupnost], ki se združijo v enotno telo Unije z enim samim institucionalnim okvirom in posplošitvijo metode Skupnosti, edina izjema je skupna zunanja in varnostna politika (vključno z obrambo), za katero so še vedno predvideni posebni postopki odločanja, kot to zahteva posebna narava tega področja.
This merger into a single entity has been accompanied by the abolition of the three-pillar structure [common foreign and security policy (CFSP), justice and home affairs (JHA) and European Community]; all three have been merged into the single corpus of the Union, with a single institutional framework and the across-the-board application of the Community method, the sole exception being the area of the CFSP (including defence), where specific decision-making procedures remain in force, as warranted by the particular nature of that policy area.
Jasna opredelitev vrednot, načel in ciljev Unije
A clear definition of the Union ’s values, principles and objectives
Nova pogodba predvideva, da se bo Pogodba o Evropski uniji začela s členi, ki opredeljujejo naravo, vrednote in načela, na katerih temelji Unija, ter cilje, ki naj bi jih uresničevala s svojo dejavnostjo.
The new Treaty provides that the TEU will open with articles defining the nature of the Union and the values and principles on which it is founded and the objectives which it is supposed to pursue by means of its action.
V prvem členu spremenjene Pogodbe o Evropski uniji so določeni temelji evropskega povezovanja: Unijo opredeljuje kot Unijo, ki jo ustanovijo države članice in na katero „prenašajo pristojnosti za uresničevanje svojih skupnih ciljev“ .
The very first article of the amended TEU lays down the basis on which the European integration process is founded: it defines the EU as a Union established by the Member States ‘on which the Member States confer competences to attain objectives they have in common’.
Ta opredelitev se tako razlikuje od opredelitve iz ustave, ki je vsebovala dvojno legitimnost Unije, temelječo na volji državljanov in držav.
This definition departs from that set out in the Constitution, which enshrined the dual legitimacy of the Union reflecting the will of the citizens and States of Europe.
Čeprav se to uradno priznanje dvojne legitimnosti Unije odpravlja, se v praksi pojavlja na številnih mestih v besedilu pogodb in odraža razvoj, ki traja že najmanj od splošnih volitev v Evropski parlament.
However, although that formal recognition of the Union’s dual legitimacy has disappeared, practical expressions of that legitimacy appear at various points in the text of the Treaties, in keeping with a development which has been continuing at least since the election of the European Parliament by universal suffrage.
Evropska unija mora biti trdno zasidrana na vrednotah, na katerih je bila osnovana in ki naj vodijo vsa dejanja institucij Unije.
This European Union must be firmly anchored to the values on which it is founded and which guide every action taken by its institutions.
V skladu s členom 2 spremenjene Pogodbe o Evropski uniji so vrednote, na katerih temelji vse evropsko povezovanje, človekovo dostojanstvo, svoboda, demokracija, enakost, pravna država, človekove pravice, vključno s pravicami pripadnikov manjšin.
In accordance with Article 2 of the revised TEU, these values, on which the entire European integration process is founded, are respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.
Te vrednote so tudi referenčno merilo za prihodnje pristope k Uniji in so lahko temelj za uporabo sankcij za države članice, ki te vrednote grobo in vztrajno kršijo.
Moreover, these values represent the reference criteria governing future accessions to the Union and may serve as the basis for imposing sanctions on any Member States which violate them on a serious, persistent basis.
Isti člen opredeljuje tudi načela, ki usmerjajo delovanje Unije: pluralizem, nediskriminacijo, strpnost, pravico, solidarnost in enakost med ženskami in moškimi.
This article also defines the principles which guide the Union’s action: pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men.
Poudariti je treba, da se je na tem področju lizbonska pogodba držala ustavne pogodbe, saj se glede skupnih temeljnih vrednot, na katerih temelji Unija, države članice v večinoma strinjajo in se jim med celotnim postopkom razprave o prihodnosti Unije dejansko ni nasprotovalo.
In this respect, the Treaty of Lisbon closely mirrors the Constitutional Treaty, given that there is a fairly broad consensus among the Member States regarding the set of common values on which the Union is founded, a consensus which was not seriously challenged at any stage in the discussions on the future of the Union.
Konkretno podobo dobijo v tretjem členu Pogodbe o Evropski uniji s političnimi, gospodarskimi in socialnimi cilji v Uniji in v njenih zunanjih odnosih.
They are fleshed out, in Article 3 of the TEU, in political, economic and social objectives to be pursued within the Union and in the sphere of external relations.
Unija tako na notranji ravni svojim državljanom ponuja območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, v katerem zagotavlja prosto gibanje oseb, ki ga spremljajo ustrezni ukrepi glede kontrole zunanjih meja, azila, priseljevanja in preprečevanja kriminala ter boja proti temu pojavu .
Accordingly, at an internal level the Union is to offer its citizens an area of freedom, security and justice, in which the free movement of persons is guaranteed, a freedom which is to be accompanied by appropriate measures concerning checks at external borders, asylum, immigration and the prevention of and fight against crime.
Vzpostavlja notranji trg
It is to establish an internal market
V skladu s francoskim predlogom ugotavljamo, da se je v tem členu opustil sklic na pošteno konkurenco, na kateri naj bi v skladu z besedilom ustave temeljil notranji trg.
Due note should be taken of the deletion, further to a French proposal, of the reference in that article to fair competition, the basis, according to the text of the Constitution, for the internal market.
Opustitev je bila upravičena s tem, da naj bi bila poštena konkurenca le eno od sredstev za vzpostavitev notranjega trga, ki je pravi cilj Unije.
That deletion was justified to the extent that ‘fair competition’ represents only one of the means to establish that internal market, the Union’s actual objective.
Sicer pa opustitev nima pravnih posledic za vlogo konkurence, kot to dokazuje Protokol (št. 6) o notranjem trgu in konkurenci. .
Moreover, that deletion has no legal implications concerning the role of competition, as demonstrated by the Protocol (No 6) on the internal market and competition. .
Prizadeva si za trajnostni razvoj Evrope na podlagi uravnotežene gospodarske rasti in stabilnosti cen, za zelo konkurenčno tržno socialno gospodarstvo, ki vodi v polno zaposlenost in socialni napredek, za visoko raven varstva in izboljšanja kakovosti okolja.
It is to work for the sustainable development of Europe, on the basis of balanced economic growth and price stability; to develop a highly competitive social market economy aiming at full employment and social progress; and to secure a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment.
Spodbuja znanstveni in tehnološki napredek.
It is to promote scientific and technological advance.
Bori se proti socialni izključenosti in diskriminaciji, spodbuja socialno pravičnost in varstvo, enakost med moškimi in ženskami, solidarnost med generacijami in varstvo otrokovih pravic.
It is to combat social exclusion and all forms of discrimination and is to promote social justice and protection, equality between men and women, solidarity between generations and the protection of the rights of the child.
Spodbuja gospodarsko, socialno in teritorialno povezanost ter solidarnost med državami članicam.
It is to promote economic, social and territorial cohesion and solidarity among the Member States.
Spoštuje bogato kulturno in jezikovno raznolikost ter skrbi za varovanje in razvoj evropske kulturne dediščine.
It is to respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity and ensures that Europe's cultural heritage is safeguarded and enhanced.
Nazadnje, vzpostavlja ekonomsko in monetarno unijo (katere valuta je euro).
Finally, it is to establish an economic and monetary union, whose currency is the euro.
Ti cilji sestavljajo osnovni politični program, iz katerega izvira ustanovitev Unije.
These objectives thus make up a basic political programme which was the well-spring for the establishment of the Union.
Njena naloga je, da cilje uresničuje z ustreznimi sredstvi ob uporabi pristojnosti, ki so ji dodeljene v pogodbah.
It is incumbent on the Union to pursue these objectives by appropriate means, using the competences conferred on it in the Treaties.