natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pravna gotovost vseeno ostaja relativen pojem, dokler prehodno obdobje režima za zaščito naložb ne bo končano in glede na pogoje veljavnosti obstoječih dvostranskih sporazumov o naložbah držav članic v skladu z mednarodnim javnim pravom.
Legal certainty remains, however, a relative term as long as the transition of the investment protection regime is not completed, and given validity terms of existing BITs of Member States under international public law.
Poročevalec želi razjasniti pravno gotovost pod pogoji potrebnega prehodnega obdobja z dvema skupinama predlogov sprememb:
Your rapporteur is intended to clarify legal certainty under the conditions of a necessary time span of transition, through two sets of amendments:
1) Uvedba časovnega razporeda za prehod
1) Introducing a timeline for the transition
Parlament bi moral vztrajati pri tem, da se z uredbo določi časovni razpored prehoda.
Parliament should insist that the Regulation sets a timeline for the transition.
Brez časovnega razporeda bi uredba dovoljevala pojav vzporednih, potencialno nezdružljivih naložbenih režimov in s tem pripomogla k pravni negotovosti.
Without a timeline, the Regulation would allow the emergence of parallel, potentially incompatible investment regimes, thus adding to legal uncertainty.
Čeprav je brez dvoma potrebno dovolj dolgo prehodno obdobje, bi bila časovno neomejena dvojnost naložbene politike EU za Parlament nesprejemljiva, saj člen 207(1) PDEU jasno navaja, da je naložbena politika pristojnost Unije.
While a sufficiently long transition is surely needed, an open-ended duality in the EU investment policy should be unacceptable for Parliament, given that Article 207(1) of the TFEU clearly states that investment policy is the competence of the Union.
V tem oziru bi bilo mogoče enako izpodbijati podaljšano obdobje neizvajanja sporazuma, kar bi prav tako privedlo do pravne negotovosti.
In this sense, an extended period of not implementing the Treaty could equally be challenged, again adding to legal uncertainty.
Določbe o pregledu v členih 5 in 12 predloga uredbe, ki navajajo, da bo Komisija najpozneje 5 let po začetku veljavnosti uredbe ocenila potrebe po nadaljnji uporabi možnosti držav članic, da se spustijo v ponovna pogajanja o dvostranskih sporazumih o naložbah ali pa začnejo nova, niso zadovoljive.
The review provisions in Art. 5 and 12 of the draft regulation - no later than 5 years after the entering into force of the Regulation the Commission will assess the need for a continued application of the possibility of Member States to re-negotiate BITS or enter into new ones - are not satisfactory.
Parlament bi moral pojasniti, da je zanj soobstoj dvostranskih sporazumov o naložbah in pojavljajočih se mednarodnih sporazumov EU o naložbah izjema, ki je začasno opravičljiva le z nadaljnjim zagotavljanjem pravne gotovosti.
Parliament should make clear that it regards the co-existence of BITs with the emergence of EU international investment treaties as an exception, justified temporarily only for the reason of providing continued legal certainty.
2) Razjasnitev pogojev za odvzem dovoljenja
2) Clarifying the conditions for withholding authorization
Predlog uredbe predlaga ločevanje med tremi kategorijami vzrokov za odvzem dovoljenja za dvostranski sporazum o naložbah.
The draft Regulation suggests a distinction between three categories of reasons to withhold an authorization for a BIT.
K negotovosti po nepotrebnem prispeva zlasti razlikovanje med „ni v nasprotju z zakonodajo Unije“ (točka a) ter med „se sporazum deloma ali v celoti prekriva z veljavnim sporazumom Unije z navedeno tretjo državo in to prekrivanje v slednjem sporazumu ni obravnavano“ (točka b).
Particularly, the distinction between "conflict with the law of the Union" (point a) and "overlap, in part or in full, with an agreement in force with that third country and this specific overlap is not addressed in the latter agreement" (point b) unnecessarily adds to uncertainty.
Predlaga namreč, da se prihodnji sporazumi EU s tretjimi državami ne bi mogli posvetiti prekrivanju ali dopuščati vzporednih režimov, kar pa načeloma ni sprejemljivo.
It suggests that a future EU agreement with a third country could not address the overlap or allow for parallel regimes, which should not be accepted as a matter of principle.
Še več, razlikovanje je odveč, ker so veljavni sporazumi EU s tretjimi državami del zakonodaje Unije, vsak dvostranski sporazum o naložbah, priglašen v skladu s členom 2, pa se samodejno odobri v okviru člena 3, zato ni nezdružljiv z delitvijo pristojnosti.
Moreover, the distinction is redundant since EU agreements in force with third countries are part of the law of the Union, and any BIT notified under Article 2 is automatically authorised under Article 3 and therefore not incompatible with the allocation of competences.
Poročevalec predlaga, da se ti dve kategoriji združita v jasnem sklicevanju na navzkrižja z zakonodajo EU.
Your rapporteur suggests to move these two categories together in a clear reference to conflicts with the EU law.
Po drugi strani pa predlog uredbe v tretji kategoriji ne pojasnjuje vzrokov za odvzem dovoljenja za dvostranski sporazum o naložbah (točka c), namreč kaj je tisto, kar bi lahko „oviralo razvoj in izvajanje naložbenih politik Unije, zlasti skupne trgovinske politike“.
On the other hand, the draft Regulation fails to make clear under the third category of reasons to withhold an authorization for a BIT (point c) what it is that may "constitute an obstacle to the development and the implementation of the Union's policies relating to investment".
Ker se nanaša na politiko, ki se šele oblikuje, to prispeva k negotovosti.
Since it refers to a policy in the making, also this adds to uncertainty.
Poročevalec Komisiji predlaga, da se obrne na organ za razvoj mandatov za pogajanja o naložbah s tretjimi državami in na temeljna koherenčna načela v členu 3(5) Lizbonske pogodbe, 6(1) Pogodbe o EU ter naslovu II delu 1 PDEU.
Your rapporteur suggests referring to the developing body of mandates for investment negotiations with third countries to the Commission and the basic coherence principles in the Lisbon Treaty under Art. 3(5) and 6(1) of the TEU and Title II of Part I of the TFEU.
V zvezi z razvojem nove naložbene politike EU poročevalec priporoča tudi, da je treba države članice v primeru ponovnega pogajanja o obstoječih ali pogajanja o novih dvostranskih sporazumih o naložbah zavezati k zagotovitvi mehanizmov za reševanje sporov, ki bi zagotovili, da lahko Komisija sodeluje v postopkih vsaj kot amicus curiae in da se odpravijo zahteve po zaupnosti, da bo lahko Komisija posredovala v tej zadevi.
In the context of the developing new EU investment policy, the Rapporteur further suggests to add an obligation to Member States in the case of the re-negotiation of existing BITs or the negotiation of new BITs to provide for a dispute settlement mechanism ensuring that the Commission is allowed to participate in the proceedings at least as an amicus curiae and that confidentiality requirements are lifted so as to allow the Commission to intervene in this quality.
To mora biti nepogrešljiv element nove naložbene politike EU in prehoda proti njej.
This should be seen as an indispensable element of the new EU investment policy and the transition towards it.
V zvezi s prakso, vzpostavljeno v okviru Sporazuma o severnoameriškem prostotrgovinskem območju (NAFTA), je splošno znano, da bi pomanjkanje preglednosti v mehanizmih za reševanje sporov, vzpostavljenih za večino obstoječih dvostranskih sporazumov o naložbah držav članic Unije, povzročilo nezdružljivost z zakonodajo Unije.
In reference to the practices established under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), it is widely acknowledged that the lack of transparency in the dispute settlement mechanisms established in most of the existing BITs of the Member States of the Union would constitute as such an incompatibility with Union law.
Zaradi tega je to vidik, ki ga morajo države članice upoštevati pri pogajanjih o novih dvostranskih sporazumih o naložbah.
This is, hence, a dimension Member States need to take into account in their negotiations of new BITs.
V tem oziru poročevalec predlaga, da se vključi sklicevanje na Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije.
In this regard, your rapporteur suggests to include a reference to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
Uvodna izjava 2 a (novo)
Rectial 2 a (new)
(2a) Komisija je v sporočilu z dne 7. julija 2010 z naslovom „Za dosego celovite evropske mednarodne naložbene politike“ ( KOM(2010)0343 ) preučila, kako bi lahko Unija razvila politiko mednarodnih naložb, ki bo povečala konkurenčnost EU ter tako prispevala k pametni, trajnostni in vključujoči rasti.
(2a) In its Communication of 7 July 2010 entitled 'Towards a comprehensive European international investment policy' ( COM(2010)0343 ), the Commission "explores how the Union may develop an international investment policy that increases EU competitiveness and thus contributes to the objectives of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth".
(3) Ob začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe so države članice Unije ohranile veliko število dvostranskih sporazumov o neposrednih tujih naložbah s tretjimi državami.
(3) At the time of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, Member States of the Union maintained a significant number of bilateral agreements with third countries relating to foreign direct investment.
Pogodba ne vsebuje nobenih izrecnih prehodnih določb za take sporazume, ki so zdaj v izključni pristojnosti Unije.
The Treaty does not contain any explicit transitional provisions for such agreements which have now come under exclusive Union competence .
Navedeno razmerje se bo razvijalo hkrati z izvajanjem pristojnosti Unije.
That relationship will develop further as the Union exercises its competence.
(4) Čeprav so po javnem mednarodnem pravu dvostranski sporazumi za države članice še vedno zavezujoči in jih bodo v prihodnosti postopoma nadomestili sporazumi Unije, ki se nanašajo na isto zadevo, se zahteva ustrezno izvajanje pogojev za njihov obstoj in razmerje do politik Unije glede neposrednih tujih naložb , zlasti skupne trgovinske politike.
(4) Although bilateral agreements remain binding on the Member States under public international law and will be progressively replaced by future agreements of the Union relating to the same subject matter, the conditions for their continuing existence and their relationship with the Union's policies relating to foreign direct investment, including in particular the common commercial policy, require appropriate management.
(5) V interesu investitorjev EU in njihovih naložb v tretje države ter v interesu držav članic gostiteljic tujih investitorjev in naložb morajo dvostranski sporazumi, ki določajo in zagotavljajo investicijske pogoje, ostati veljavni .
(5) In the interest of EU investors and their investments in third countries, and of Member States hosting foreign investors and investments, bilateral agreements that specify and guarantee the conditions of investment should be maintained in force .
(5) V interesu investitorjev EU in njihovih naložb v tretje države ter v interesu držav članic gostiteljic tujih investitorjev in naložb morajo dvostranski sporazumi, ki določajo in zagotavljajo pogoje neposrednih tujih naložb , ostati zavezujoči v okviru mednarodnega javnega prava, brez poseganja v pravico Komisije, da obstoječe sporazume o neposrednih tujih naložbah postopoma nadomesti z novimi sporazumi, ki državam članicam zagotavljajo enake ali ugodnejše pogoje .
(5) In the interest of EU investors and their investments in third countries and of Member States hosting foreign investors and investments, bilateral agreements that specify and guarantee the conditions of foreign direct investment remain binding under public international law without prejudice to the right of the Commission to replace progressively existing direct foreign investment agreements with new agreements offering equal or better conditions to Member States .
(6) Ta uredba določa pogoje, pod katerimi je treba državam članicam dovoliti, da ohranijo ali sprejmejo veljavnost mednarodnih sporazumov o neposrednih tujih naložbah.
(6) This Regulation lays down the conditions under which Member States should be authorised to maintain in force or to permit to enter into force international agreements relating to foreign direct investment.
(7) Ta uredba določa pogoje, pod katerimi se države članice lahko pooblastijo, da spremenijo ali sklenejo mednarodne sporazume o naložbah.
(7) This Regulation lays down the conditions under which Member States are empowered to amend or conclude international agreements relating to investment.
(7) Ta uredba določa pogoje, pod katerimi se države članice lahko pooblastijo, da spremenijo ali sklenejo mednarodne sporazume o neposrednih tujih naložbah.
(7) This Regulation lays down the conditions under which Member States are empowered to amend or conclude international agreements relating to foreign direct investment.
(8) Ker je dovoljenje za ohranitev, spremembo ali sklenitev sporazumov, zajetih v tej uredbi, izdano na področju izključne pristojnosti Unije, ga je treba šteti za izjemni ukrep.
(8) As the authorisation to maintain, amend or conclude agreements covered by this Regulation is granted in an area of exclusive Union competence, it must be regarded as an exceptional measure.
(8) Ker je dovoljenje za ohranitev, spremembo ali sklenitev sporazumov o neposrednih tujih naložbah , zajetih v tej uredbi, izdano na področju izključne pristojnosti Unije, ga je treba šteti za izjemni ukrep.
(8) As the authorisation to maintain, amend or conclude foreign direct investment agreements covered by this Regulation is granted in an area of exclusive Union competence, it must be regarded as an exceptional measure.
(9a) Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da so dvostranski sporazumi o naložbah povsem združljivi z načelom Unije za skladnost razvojnih politik.
(9a) Member States should ensure that bilateral investment treaties are fully compatible with the Union principle of policy coherence for development.
Komisija je v obrazložitvi svojega predloga povsem jasna.
The Commission is very clear in the explanatory memorandum of its proposal.
Ker je za neposredne tuje naložbe izključno pristojna EU, se postopek, uveden s tem predlogom, šteje za izjemni prehodni ukrep.
Given that the EU is exclusively competent for Foreign Direct Investment, the procedure established by the proposal must be regarded as an exceptional transitional measure.
Države članice so upravičene do ponovnih pogajanj o priglašenih dvostranskih sporazumih o naložbah, če v celoti izpolnjujejo obveznosti iz predloga uredbe.
Member States are entitled to renegotiate the notified Bilateral Investment Treaties if they fulfil the obligations set out in the Draft Regulation.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da so dvostranski sporazumi o naložbah, ki jih sklenejo z državami v razvoju, povsem združljivi z načelom EU za skladnost razvojnih politik.
Member States should make sure that Bilateral Investment Treaties between them and developing countries are fully compatible with the EU principle of policy coherence for development.
(10) Komisiji mora biti omogočeno, da odvzame dovoljenje, če je sporazum v nasprotju z zakonodajo Unije, razen neskladnosti zaradi delitve pristojnosti med Unijo in njenimi državami članicami.
(10) The Commission should be able to withdraw the authorisation if an agreement conflicts with the law of the Union other than the incompatibilities arising from the allocation of competence between the Union and its Member States.
Dovoljenje se prav tako lahko odvzame , če veljaven sporazum Unije s tretjo državo vsebuje določbe o naložbah, podobne tistim iz sporazuma države članice.
The authorisation may also be withdrawn if an agreement of the Union in force with a third country contains investment provisions similar to those of a Member State agreement.
Za zagotovitev, da sporazumi držav članic ne ogrožajo razvoja in izvajanja naložbenih politik Unije, zlasti avtonomnih ukrepov skupne trgovinske politike, se dovoljenje lahko odvzame.
In order to ensure that agreements of Member States do not undermine the development and implementation of the Union's policies relating to investment, including in particular of autonomous measures of common commercial policy, authorisation may be withdrawn.
(10) Komisiji mora biti omogočeno, da odvzame dovoljenje, če je sporazum o neposrednih tujih naložbah v nasprotju z zakonodajo Unije , med drugih z zahtevami za spoštovanje človekovih pravic ter s socialno in okoljsko zakonodajo , razen neskladnosti zaradi delitve pristojnosti med Unijo in njenimi državami članicami.
(10) The Commission should be able to withdraw the authorisation if a foreign direct investment agreement conflicts with the law of the Union , including respect for the protection of human rights and social and environmental legislation, save where the incompatibilities arise from the allocation of competence between the Union and its Member States.
Takšno dovoljenje se odvzame samo, če Komisija prej od države članice zahteva, naj se znova pogaja o sporazumu o neposrednih tujih naložbah, s katerim je kršila zakonodajo Unije.
Such authorisations should be withdrawn only following a request by the Commission for the Member State to renegotiate the foreign direct investment agreement with which the Member State has failed to comply.
Prav tako bi moralo biti mogoče odvzeti dovoljenje, če veljaven sporazum Unije o neposrednih tujih naložbah s tretjo državo vsebuje določbe o naložbah, vsebinsko enakovredne tistim iz sporazuma države članice o neposrednih tujih naložbah .
It should also be possible to withdraw the authorisation if a foreign direct investment agreement of the Union in force with a third country contains investment provisions that are equivalent in substance to those of a Member State foreign direct investment agreement.
(11) Dovoljenje za spremembo ali sklenitev sporazumov iz te uredbe državam članicam zlasti omogoča, da obravnavajo kakršno koli neskladnost med svojimi mednarodnimi sporazumi o naložbah in zakonodajo Unije, razen neskladnosti zaradi delitev pristojnosti med Unijo in njenimi državami članicami, ki so obravnavane v tej uredbi.
(11) The authorisation to amend or conclude agreements provided for by this Regulation notably allows Member States to address any incompatibilities between their international agreements relating to investment and the law of the Union, other than incompatibilities arising from the allocation of competences between the Union and its Member States, which are addressed in this Regulation.
(11) Dovoljenje za spremembo ali sklenitev sporazumov o neposrednih tujih naložbah iz te uredbe državam članicam zlasti omogoča, da obravnavajo kakršno koli neskladnost med svojimi mednarodnimi sporazumi o neposrednih tujih naložbah in zakonodajo Unije, razen neskladnosti zaradi delitev pristojnosti med Unijo in njenimi državami članicami, ki so obravnavane v tej uredbi.
(11) The authorisation to amend or conclude foreign direct investment agreements provided for by this Regulation notably allows Member States to address any incompatibilities between their international agreements relating to foreign direct investment and the law of the Union, other than incompatibilities arising from the allocation of competences between the Union and its Member States, which are addressed in this Regulation.
(12) Komisija najpozneje pet let po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi poročilo o uporabi poglavij II in III te uredbe.
(12) No later than five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission should present to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of Chapters II and III of this Regulation.
V tem poročilu je med drugim treba pregledati potrebo po nadaljnji uporabi teh poglavij.
This report should, inter alia, review the need for the continued application of these chapters.
Kadar poročilo priporoča prenehanje uporabe določb teh poglavij ali kadar predlaga spremembo teh določb, mu je treba priložiti ustrezni zakonodajni predlog.
Where the report recommends to discontinue the application of the provisions of these Chapters or where it would propose to modify these provisions, it should be accompanied by an appropriate legislative proposal.
Dvostranski sporazumi, sklenjeni med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, so po javnem mednarodnem pravu za pogodbenice še vedno zavezujoči, razen če jih ne nadomesti sporazum Unije o naložbah ali kako drugače prenehajo veljati.
Unless replaced by an agreement of the Union concerning investment, or otherwise terminated, bilateral agreements concluded by Member States with third countries remain binding on the parties under public international law.
Dvostranski sporazumi o neposrednih tujih naložbah , sklenjeni med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, so po javnem mednarodnem pravu za pogodbenice še vedno zavezujoči, razen če jih ne nadomesti sporazum Unije o neposrednih tujih naložbah ali kako drugače prenehajo veljati.
Unless replaced by an agreement of the Union concerning foreign direct investment, or otherwise terminated, bilateral foreign direct investment agreements concluded by Member States with third countries remain binding on the parties under public international law.
Določiti bi bilo treba okvirno obdobje, v katerem bi se upoštevalo, kdaj bi se lahko končal prehod od obstoječih dvostranskih sporazumov držav članic o naložbah na mednarodne sporazume Unije o naložbah.
An indicative timeline should be set that contemplates when the transition from the existing bilateral investment treaties of Member States to Union international investment treaties might be completed.
(13) Sporazumi, ki se dovolijo v skladu s to uredbo, ali dovoljenja za začetek pogajanj za spremembo obstoječega ali sklenitev novega dvostranskega sporazuma s tretjo državo ne smejo v nobenem primeru ovirati izvajanja naložbenih politik Unije, zlasti skupne trgovinske politike.
(13) Agreements authorised under this Regulation or authorisations to open negotiations to amend an existing or to conclude a new bilateral agreement with a third country should not in any case be allowed to constitute an obstacle to the implementation of the Union's policies relating to investment, in particular common commercial policy.
(13) Sporazumi o neposrednih tujih naložbah , ki se dovolijo v skladu s to uredbo, ali dovoljenja za začetek pogajanj za spremembo obstoječega ali sklenitev novega dvostranskega sporazuma s tretjo državo ne smejo v nobenem primeru ovirati izvajanja politik Unije glede neposrednih tujih naložb , zlasti skupne trgovinske politike
(13) Agreements on foreign direct investment authorised under this Regulation or authorisations to open negotiations to amend an existing or to conclude a new bilateral agreement with a third country should not in any case be allowed to constitute an obstacle to the implementation of the Union's policies relating to foreign direct investment, in particular common commercial policy.
(15) Sporazumi o naložbah, sklenjeni med državami članicami, ne smejo biti zajeti v tej uredbi.
(15) Agreements between Member States relating to investment should not be covered by this Regulation.
Ta uredba določa določila, pogoje in postopke, s katerimi se državam članicam dovoli ohranitev, spremembe ali sklenitev dvostranskih sporazumov o neposrednih tujih naložbah s tretjimi državami.
This Regulation establishes the terms, conditions and the procedure under which Member States are authorised to maintain in force, amend or conclude bilateral agreements with third countries relating to foreign direct investment ('FDI') .