natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
185. obžaluje, da je Evropsko računsko sodišče v zvezi z letnim poročilom o dejavnostih za GD AIDCO poudarilo, da se "na področju zunanjih ukrepov v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih in izjavi Urada za sodelovanje EuropeAid premalo odražajo s strani Evropskega računskega sodišča ugotovljene pomembne stopnje napak in pomanjkljivosti nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov, zasnovanih za zagotavljanje zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij na ravni organizacij, ki izvajajo projekte" (točka 2.17 in tabela 2.1 letnega poročila);
185.Regrets that, as concerns the annual activity report of DG AIDCO, the ECA stressed that "the material incidence of error and the weaknesses in the supervisory and control systems designed to ensure the legality and regularity of the transactions at the level of project implementing organisations in the area of external actions found by the ECA are not sufficiently reflected in the annual activity report and declaration of Europe Aid Co-operation Office" (point 2.17 and Table 2.1 of the Annual Report);
186. z obžalovanjem ugotavlja tudi, da analize letnih načrtov upravljanja generalnih direktoratov ne vključujejo zunanjih revizorjev projektov, niti posebnih tveganj, povezanih z različnimi vrstami izvajalskih agencij (nevladne organizacije, mednarodne organizacije, vladne ustanove, ipd.) ali metod financiranja (donacija, proračunska podpora, skrbniški sklad, ipd.) (točka 8.28 letnega poročila);
186.Notes also with regret that once again in the analysis of the annual management plans of some Directorates-General there is no indication of project external auditors, nor of the particular risks associated with the different types of implementing organisations (NGO, international organisation, government institution, etc.) and funding methods (grant, budgetary support, trust fund, etc.) (point 8.28 of the Annual Report);
187. zaskrbljeno ugotavlja, da so bile zgoraj navedene ugotovitve Evropskega računskega sodišča enake že v letnem poročilu za leto 2005, namreč neskladnost podatkov iz zunanjih revizij, posredovanih na sedež, pomanjkanje sistematične centralizacije teh podatkov, ki bi omogočala sprejemanje odločitev, in neučinkovito spremljanje; zato poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma ukrepa;
187.Notes with concern that the ECA’s findings referred to above were the same in its 2005 Annual Report, i.e. inconsistency of external audit information submitted to the headquarters, lack of systematic centralisation of this information in order to reach conclusions and insufficient follow up; therefore asks the Commission to react to these findings urgently;
188. obžaluje, da sodeč po letnem poročilu Evropskega računskega sodišča "Oddelek za notranjo revizijo (IAC) trenutno ne zagotavlja letne splošne ocene stanja notranje kontrole v uradu EuropeAid in GD ECHO ...
188.Regrets also that according to the ECA's Annual Report "the Internal Audit Capability (IAC) does not at present provide an annual overall assessment of the state of internal control in Europe-Aid and DG ECHO ...
Čeprav sta bili v oddelku za notranjo revizijo v letu 2006 ustanovljeni dve dodatni delovni mesti, je malo verjetno, da bo s sedanjim številom zaposlenih v predlaganem triletnem ciklu možno zagotoviti pokritost z revizijami, opredeljeno v oceni revizijskih potreb za EuropeAid" (točka 8.30 letnega poročila);
Despite the creation during 2006 of two additional posts in the IAC, it does not seem feasible with the present staff complement to carry out, within the three-year cycle proposed, the full audit coverage identified in the Europe-Aid Audit Needs Assessment" (point 8.30 of the Annual Report);
189. poziva Komisijo, naj poda letno splošno oceno stanja notranje kontrole v GD AIDCO in oceni, ali so za izvedbo te naloge v oddelku za notranjo revizijo potrebna dodatna delovna mesta;
189.Asks the Commission to carry out an annual overall assessment of the state of play of internal control in DG AIDCO and to evaluate whether additional posts are necessary in the IAC service to carry out this task;
190. je seznanjen o razmerah v zvezi z dejavnostmi naknadnega kontroliranja Komisije (točki 8.23 in 8.33 letnega poročila), ki jih kritizira Evropsko računsko sodišče, in poziva Komisijo, naj redno obvešča Odbor za proračunski nadzor o ukrepih, s katerimi namerava izboljšati razmere;
190.Notes the situation criticised by the ECA as regards the Commission's ex post control activities (points 8.23 and 8.33 of the Annual Report), and calls on the Commission to regularly inform its Committee on Budgetary Control of the steps taken to remedy the situation;
191. poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej izboljšuje oceno tveganj GD AIDCO, pri tem pa se naj navezuje na ugotovitve revizorjev na ravni projekta ter razlikuje med različnimi vrstami izvajalskih agencij in metodami financiranja;
191.Invites the Commission to further improve DG AIDCO's risk assessment by making reference to the findings of auditors at project level and by making a distinction according to the different types of implementing organisation and funding method;
192. poziva GD AIDCO, naj izboljša revizijska pooblastila za notranje revizije, tako da bodo vključevala vsa znana področja tveganja, vključno s preverjanjem skladnosti z zahtevami Komisije za postopke sklepanja pogodb in upravičenost odhodkov;
192.Invites DG AIDCO to improve the terms of reference of its external audits to cover all known risk areas, including the verification of compliance with the Commission's requirements regarding contracting procedures and the eligibility of expenditure;
193. poudarja, da so v obdobju med 2000 in 2006 prispevki EU za Združene narode narasli za 700 % (z 200 milijonov EUR v letu 2000 na 1,4 milijarde EUR v letu 2007); ne razume, zakaj nihče ne spremlja sredstev, ki jih Komisija prenese v mednarodne skrbniške sklade;
193.Underlines that in the period 2000 to 2006 EU contributions to the UN have increased by 700% (from EUR 200 million in 2000 to EUR 1,4 billion in 2007); cannot understand the lack of follow up of funds transferred to international trust funds by the Commission;
194. v zvezi s tem izraža zaskrbljenost nad pomanjkanjem osnovnih informacij, na podlagi katerih bi lahko organ, pristojen za podeljevanje razrešnic, podelil razrešnico glede izvrševanja sredstev iz postavke zunanjih ukrepov;
194.In this context, expresses its concern about the lack of basic information necessary for the discharge authority to proceed to a meaningful discharge in respect of the funds implemented under the external action heading;
195. vztraja, da je treba obvezno razviti usklajen informacijski sistem – po možnosti omogočiti bazo podatkov CRIS (skupni informacijski sistem Relex), da bo posredovala tovrstne informacije –, ki bi organu, pristojnemu za podeljevanje razrešnic, pa tudi splošni javnosti nudil pregledno bazo podatkov z nazornim pregledom projektov po vsem svetu, ki se financirajo s sredstvi EU, ter končnimi prejemniki teh sredstev;
195.Insists that a harmonised information system should be urgently developed - preferably the Common Relex Information System (CRIS) database should be enabled to deliver this kind of information - in order to provide the discharge authority in particular, and the public in general, with a fully transparent database containing the full overview of projects financed with EU funds in the world and the final recipients of these funds;
196. opozarja, da bi morala Komisija v skladu s finančno uredbo od maja 2007 imeti možnost, da nemudoma ugotovi, kdo so končni prejemniki in izvršitelji vseh projektov, financiranih ali sofinanciranih s sredstvi EU;
196.Recalls that under the Financial Regulation, the Commission should have been able since May 2007 to immediately identify the final beneficiaries and implementing actors of any project financed or co-financed with EU funds;
197. meni, da bi bilo treba, ko gre za mednarodne skrbniške sklade (kjer je EU največji donator), okrepiti prepoznavnost, politično vodstvo in možnost nadzora Komisije, ne da bi se pri tem zmanjšala učinkovitost ukrepov na tem področju;
197.Considers that the visibility, political guidance and possibility of control by the Commission of international trust funds (where the EU is a major donor) should be strengthened without compromising the effectiveness of action in this field;
198. poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu predloži načrt za še večji nadzor EU nad svojimi zunanjimi ukrepi;
198.Invites the Commission to present to Parliamenta plan to further increase EU ownership of its external actions;
199. izraža zaskrbljenost nad tem, da je Parlament v dveh primerih zahteval seznam projektov, ki se financirajo s sredstvi EU, Komisija pa je šele po dveh mesecih in pol posredovala seznam projektov, ki se financirajo iz programa CARDS (pomoč Skupnosti za obnovo, razvoj in stabilizacijo), in po trinajstih mesecih osnovne informacije o projektih v Iraku, ki se sofinancirajo s sredstvi EU; zahteva, da se nemudoma odpravijo takšne pomanjkljivosti za vsa sredstva, upravljana pod postavko zunanjih ukrepov;
199.Expresses its concern about a situation in which the two cases where Parliament asked for the list of projects financed by EU funds it took the Commission 2 ½ months to deliver the list of projects financed under CARDS (Community assistance for reconstruction, development and stabilisation) and 13 months to provide basic information about the projects co-financed with EU funds in Iraq; insists on the immediate rectification of this situation for all funds managed under external actions;
200. poziva Komisijo, naj z vso resnostjo preuči odkrite pomanjkljivosti glede sklepanja pogodb in upravičenosti odhodkov, hkrati pa globoko obžaluje kritično oceno Evropskega računskega sodišča na tem področju, ki sodi v okvir neposrednega finančnega poslovodenja Komisije;
200.Urges the Commission to address very seriously the detected deficiencies regarding contracting procedures and the eligibility of expenditure, and deeply regrets the critical assessment of the ECA in this area, which is under the Commission's direct financial management;
201. soglaša z Računskim sodiščem, da bi morala Komisija informacije o vseh revizijah projektov vnesti v skupni informacijski sistem Relex (CRIS) in jih bolje povezati z informacijami o vodenju projektov; prav tako poziva sedež EuropeAida pri Komisiji, naj pregleda finančne informacije, ki so jih posredovale delegacije, tudi na podlagi revizij, ki so jih opravili na sedežu, in tako zagotovi celovitost in skladnost informacij;
201.Agrees with the ECA that the Commission should include information on all audits of projects in the CRIS and should better link this information to project management information; also asks the Commission's EuropeAid headquarters to review the financial information provided by the delegations, supported through headquarters' audits, in order to ensure its completeness and consistency;
202. poziva Komisijo, naj poveča preglednost in izboljša dostop do dokumentacije o projektih, ki jih upravljajo agencije Združenih narodov, ter nadaljuje z razvojem jasnih smernic in postopkov v sklopu okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma, sklenjenega med Evropsko skupnostjo in Združenimi narodi (FAFA), ki določa okvir za upravljanje finančnih prispevkov, ki jih Komisija namenja Združenim narodom;
202.Invites the Commission to improve the transparency and access to documentation relating to projects managed by UN agencies and to continue to develop clear guidelines and procedures within FAFA, setting out the framework for managing the financial contributions made by the Commission to the UN;
203. poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu poroča o nadzoru, ki se izvaja v okviru okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Združenimi narodi (FAFA);
203.Invites the Commission to report to it on controls undertaken under FAFA;
204. pozitivno ocenjuje rezultate revizije izvajanja instrumentov Phare in strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju v Bolgariji in Romuniji ter programov pomoči za Turčijo, pri kateri je bila ugotovljena zanemarljiva raven napak; je seznanjen z napakami in pomanjkljivostmi pri izvajanju instrumenta SAPARD v Bolgariji in Romuniji; poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej sodeluje z oblastmi obeh držav, da zagotovi spoštovanje vseh zahtev za javne razpise in dobro finančno poslovodenje ter ustrezne pravilne, redne in upravičene zahtevke za pomoč Skupnosti;
204.Appreciates the results of the audit of implementation of the Phare and ISPA instruments in Bulgaria and Romania and the assistance programme for Turkey, which identified an insignificant level of error; takes note of the errors and weaknesses found in relation to the implementation of the SAPARD instrument in Bulgaria and Romania; calls on the Commission to continue working with the authorities of both countries to ensure that all requirements for public tendering and sound financial management are met and that adequate assurance of the correctness, regularity and eligibility of claims on Community assistance is provided;
205. je seznanjen z oceno Računskega sodišča, da je nacionalni nadzorni sistem, ki je povezan z decentraliziranim izvajalskim sistemom (DIS) Bolgarije, Romunije in Turčije, še vedno šibak;
205.Notes the ECA's assessment that the national supervisory systems linked to the Decentralised Implementation Systems (DIS) of Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey remained weak;
206. ponovno poudarja svojo zaskrbljenost zaradi zamud pri akreditaciji razširjenega decentraliziranega izvajalskega sistema (EDIS) v Bolgariji ter poziva Komisijo in bolgarske oblasti, naj poglobijo sodelovanje in prizadevanja za zagotovitev ustreznih upravljalnih in kontrolnih struktur pa tudi upravnih zmogljivosti, ki bi omogočile učinkovito delovanje sistema EDIS;
206.Reiterates its concern about the delays in the accreditation of the Extended Decentralised Implementation System (EDIS) in Bulgaria, and urges the Commission and the Bulgarian authorities to step up their cooperation and efforts in order to ensure that adequate management and control structures as well as administrative capacities are in place to allow efficient functioning of EDIS;
207. podpira priporočila Računskega sodišča, naj Komisija podrobno spremlja uspešno delovanje nacionalnih nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov, zlasti pripravo in upravljanje javnih razpisov v Turčiji, javnih naročil v okviru sistema EDIS v Bolgariji in Romuniji ter pravočasno izvajanje nacionalnega sofinanciranja; poudarja potrebo po krepitvi upravnih zmogljivosti tistih držav, ki so nedavno pristopile, in tistih, ki so v postopku pristopa;
207.Supports the recommendations of the ECA to the Commission that the Commission closely monitor the effective functioning of national supervisory and control systems, notably the preparation and management of tenders in Turkey, procurement under EDIS in Bulgaria and Romania and the timely delivery of national co-financing; underlines the need to strengthen the administrative capacity of those countries that have recently acceded and those which are in the course of accession;
208. izraža zadovoljstvo glede ocene Računskega sodišča, da je Komisija po posebnem poročilu Računskega sodišča o tesnem medinstitucionalnem sodelovanju iz leta 2003 sprejela več popravnih ukrepov; poziva Komisijo, naj močneje spodbuja vlade držav upravičenk k uporabi rezultatov zaključenih projektov v okviru njihovih reformnih prizadevanj; podpira priporočilo Računskega sodišča, naj Komisija zmanjša stopnjo podrobnosti v pogodbah o tesnem medinstitucionalnem sodelovanju, da omogoči večjo prilagodljivost za projektno upravljanje;
208.Is pleased with the ECA's assessment that several remedial measures were introduced by the Commission in the follow-up to the ECA's special report on twinning from 2003; invites the Commission to motivate beneficiary governments more strongly to make use of the outputs of projects realised in the context of their reform efforts; supports the ECA's recommendation to the Commission that the Commission reduce the level of detail of the twinning contracts in order to allow greater flexibility for project management;
209. je seznanjen z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij na področju zunanjih ukrepov in povezanih nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov; poziva Komisijo, naj izvede vse potrebne sistemske izboljšave, da zagotovi odpravo nepravilnosti, ugotovljenih na ravni organizacije izvajanja projektov v tretjih državah;
209.Notes the ECA's findings as to the legality and regularity of transactions in the field of external actions and of related supervisory and control systems; invites the Commission to undertake all necessary system improvements so as to ensure that irregularities identified at the level of project-implementing organisations in third countries are removed;
210. poziva Komisijo, naj predloži poročilo o tem, kaj natančno je bilo opravljeno za olajšanje razmer iraških beguncev in razseljenih oseb;
210.Invites the Commission to present to it a report on what exactly has been done to alleviate the situation of Iraqi refugees and displaced persons;
211. poudarja svoj interes glede pomoči EU, namenjene Afganistanu, in poziva Komisijo, naj predloži poročilo o stanju izvrševanja skladov EU za Afganistan, in naj izrazi svoje mnenje o izgonu vršilca dolžnosti predstavnika EU iz te države z obrazložitvijo, da je bil v stiku z afganistanskimi talibani;
211.Stresses its interest regarding the EU assistance provided to Afghanistan, and invites the Commission to present to it a report on the state of play of the implementation of EU funds for Afghanistan, and to comment on the expulsion from that country of the acting EU representative on a charge of having communicated with the Afghan Taliban;
212. pričakuje, da bodo predložena letna poročila o pogodbah za izvrševanje proračuna, letni seznami projektov in njihove lokacije ter seznami končnih upravičencev; meni, da mora imeti poročevalec za razrešnice dostop do informacij, ki so zaradi varnostnih razlogov zaupne; pozdravlja zavezo Komisije o ponovnem pogajanju z Združenimi narodi o ustreznih sporazumih o skrbniških skladih, da doseže skupne smernice o poročanju in razkritju končnih upravičencev; pozdravlja tudi zavezo Komisije o organizaciji letnih zasedanj med Parlamentom in višjimi uradniki Združenih narodov, odgovornimi za upravljanje večdonatorskih skrbniških skladov, ter meni, da bi to zagotovilo okvir Združenim narodom za zagotavljanje dodatnih informacij o skladih EU;
212.Expects to receive annual reports on budget implementation contracts, annual list of projects and their location and lists of final beneficiaries; considers that its rapporteur for the discharge should have access to information declared confidential for security reasons; welcomes the Commission's commitment to re-negotiate relevant agreements on trust funds with the UN in order to achieve joint reporting guidelines and disclosure of final beneficiaries; welcomes also the Commission's commitment to organise annual meetings between Parliament and senior UN staff responsible for the management of multi-donor trust funds and considers that this would provide a framework for the UN to provide additional information on EU funds;
Humanitarna pomoč in razvoj
Humanitarian aid and development
213. obžaluje, da je ocena, ki jo je o notranjih revizijah v GD ECHO podalo Računsko sodišče, le "delno zadovoljiva" (priloga 8.2 letnega poročila);
213.Regrets that the ECA's assessment of internal audits in DG ECHO is only "partially satisfactory" (Annex 8.2 to the Annual Report);
214. v celoti podpira zaključke Računskega sodišča glede GD ECHO v letnim poročilu, in sicer: "GD ECHO mora razjasniti pravila o upravičenosti odhodkov, da prepreči dvoumne opredelitve in ravnotežje med revizijami, opravljenimi na sedežu GD ECHO in revizijami izvajalskih partnerjev na terenu, da se pridobi boljši pregled nad resničnostjo odhodkov za projekte" (točki 8.11 in 8.18 letnega poročila);
214.Fully supports the ECA's conclusions concerning DG ECHO in the Annual Report, as follows: “DG ECHO should clarify the rules on eligibility of expenditure to prevent varying interpretations and the balance between DG ECHO's headquarters and field audits of implementing partners should be reviewed, in order to obtain a better view of the reality of project expenditure” (points 8.11 and 8.18 of the Annual Report);
215. obžaluje ugotovitev v točki 2.1 letnega poročila o dejavnostih generalnega direktorata za razvoj (GD DEV), da je "zagotavljanje skladnosti politik Skupnosti z vplivom na države v razvoju pomemben vir tveganja.
215.Regrets the finding set out at point 2.1 of the annual activity report of the Directorate-General for Development (DG DEV) to the effect that "Ensuring the coherence of Community policies with an impact on developing countries, is a major source of risk.
To tveganje je najbolj bistveno za trgovino, zlasti za pogajanja o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
This risk is most relevant to respect to trade, notably Economic Partnerships Agreement (EPA) negotiations.
Predstavlja kritično dimenzijo razvojne politike, je pa zmogljivost na tem področju strnjena v GD za trgovino.
This represents a critical dimension of development policy but the capacity in this area is concentrated in DG Trade.
To tveganje še kar obstaja kljub okrepitvi in koncentraciji odgovornosti, povezanih s trgovino, po reorganizaciji GD DEV julija 2006";
This risk persists in spite of the reinforcement and concentration of the responsibilities related to trade following DEV's reorganisation in July 2006";
216. poziva Komisijo, naj Odboru za proračunski nadzor posreduje svoje predloge o reševanju teh razmer in o ukrepih, sprejetih v letu 2008, za izboljšanje delovanja notranjega kontrolnega sistema v GD DEV glede na raven izvajanja standardov notranje kontrole;
216.Asks the Commission to present to the Committee on Budgetary Control its ideas on how to confront this situation and the measures to be taken in 2008 to improve the functioning of the internal control system in DG DEV with regard to the level of implementation of internal control standards;
217. z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da se je po posebnem poročilu Računskega sodišča št. 5/2006 glede programa MEDA "upravljanje programa MEDA s strani Komisije od prvih let vidno izboljšalo in ga je mogoče šteti za zadovoljivo";
217.Notes with satisfaction that according to the ECA Special Report No 5/2006 concerning the MEDA programme, "the Commission’s management of the MEDA programme has clearly improved since the early years and can be considered as satisfactory";
218. poleg tega ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da so zaradi prenosa nalog delegacije Komisije igrale pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju programa, tako da so pomagale partnerskim državam pri odpravljanju težav postopkovnih vidikov javnih naročil;
218.Notes furthermore, as concluded by the ECA, that, as a result of devolution, EC Delegations played an important role in the implementation of the programme by helping partner countries to deal with the procedural aspects of procurement;
219. poziva Komisijo, naj redno obvešča o izvajanju pregledov na kraju samem, ugotavljanju omembe vrednih primerov suma goljufij ali drugih finančnih nepravilnosti med zadnjim letom izvajanja programa MEDA;
219.Asks the Commission to regularly inform it of the carrying out of on-the-spot checks and inspections, identifying noticeable cases of suspected fraud or other financial irregularities during the last year of implementation of the MEDA programme;
220. pričakuje izboljšanje vidnosti ukrepov, ki jih EU financira z mednarodnimi skrbniškimi skladi, zlasti glede vsot, ki so večje od 1 milijarde EUR in so bile prenesene iz proračuna EU v sklade Združenih narodov in Svetovne banke; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi okrepitev političnega vodstva, vidnosti EU in nadzora nad skladi;
220.Looks forward to an increase in the visibility of actions financed by the EU via international trust funds, in particular in the context of the sums totalling more than EUR 1 billion which have been transferred from the EU budget to the UN and World Bank funds; urges the Commission to ensure that political guidance, EU visibility and the control of the funds used are enhanced;