natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V skladu s poročanjem je skupaj 63 milijard EUR namenjenih za projekte, predvidene za financiranje v okviru lizbonske strategije , izbiranje teh projektov pa je enako hitro ali malo hitrejše od izbiranja v drugih ukrepih.
A total of 63 billion EUR is reported as allocated to Lisbon earmarking projects and that project selection under Lisbon earmarking is at the same level or slightly faster than selection for other actions.
Zgoraj omenjeni povprečni napredek držav članic je kar zadovoljiv glede na resno poslabšanje socialno-ekonomskih razmer v letih 2008 in 2009, ki ga je povzročila svetovna kriza, vendar tudi zaradi reforme kohezijske politike za obdobje 2007–2013, oba dejavnika sta namreč zelo vplivala na njeno izvajanje.
The abovementioned average progress made by the Member States can be considered rather reasonable given the context of serious deterioration in the socio-economic situation in 2008-2009 due to the global crisis, but also the reform made to the policy for the period 2007-2013, as both of these factors have had strong impact upon implementation.
Dokaze je mogoče najti v pregledu izvajanja ukrepov kohezijske politike, sprejetih za podporo evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva ( delovni dokument služb Komisije Kohezijska politika: odzivanje na gospodarsko krizo ), ki temelji predvsem na podatkih iz nacionalnih strateških poročil.
The evidence is provided in a review of the implementation of cohesion policy measures adopted in support of the European Economic Recovery Plan ( Commission Staff Working Paper ' Cohesion Policy: Responding to the economic crisis) , which draws primarily on the information provided in national strategic reports.
Med manj in visoko razvitimi regijami EU je v mnogih pogledih še vedno očitna razlika, napredek med državami in med temami pa se zelo razlikuje, s splošnimi stopnjami izbiranja projektov nad 40 % v 9 državah članicah in pod 20 % v 4 državah članicah.
There is still an obvious gap between the less developed and highly developed EU regions in many respects and progress varies significantly between countries and across themes, with aggregate selection rates above 40% in the case of 9 Member States and below 20 % for 4 Member States.
Regije, ki zaostajajo, potrebujejo dodatno pomoč pri reševanju socialno-ekonomskih težav.
The lagging-behind regions need further support in their efforts to overcome their socio-economic difficulties.
Poročevalec meni, da so zamude pri izbiranju projektov zlasti velike na nekaterih strateških področjih.
According to the Rapporteur, certain strategic areas are facing particular delays in project selection.
Področja, ki potrebujejo posebno pozornost in za katera bi bilo treba izvesti podrobno analizo vzrokov, so: železniški sektor, nekatere energetske in okoljske naložbe, digitalno gospodarstvo, socialna vključenost, upravljanje in razvoj zmogljivosti.
The areas of special concern, where an in-depth analysis of the reasons should be accomplished, are the following: rail sector, certain energy and environmental investments, digital economy, social inclusion, governance and capacity building.
Zato so potrebna dodatna prizadevanja, da bi se preprečile pretirane zamude, okrepila učinkovitost izvajanja in zagotovila večja finančna disciplina.
Therefore, additional efforts are needed to avoid excessive delays, strengthen performance of the implementation and to ensure higher financial discipline.
Na drugi strani poročevalec izpostavlja večjo absorpcijo pri okoljskih projektih v programih evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja, saj gre za pozitivni razvoj, ki kaže na nedvomno dodano vrednost čezmejnega, nadnacionalnega in medregionalnega sodelovanja.
On the other hand, the Rapporteur highlights higher absorption of environmental projects under European Territorial Cooperation programmes as it is a positive development suggesting a clear added value of cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation.
Strateško poročanje
Strategic Reporting Exercise
Strateško poročanje daje pravočasne dokaze o napredku pri izvajanju v vsej EU-27 in podlago za razpravo na visoki ravni, medsebojne strokovne preglede, učenje politike ter spodbudo za izboljšanje kakovosti izvajanja.
The strategic reporting exercise provides timely evidence of the progress in implementation throughout the EU-27 offering a basis for high-level debate, peer review, policy learning and an incentive to improve the quality of performance.
Kljub temu so bile opažene pomembne omejitve.
Nevertheless, some important limitations have been observed.
Poročevalec meni, da bi morale države članice v naslednjem krogu strateškega poročanja za 2012–2013 uporabljati temeljne kazalnike, kar bi olajšalo primerjavo na ravni EU.
In Rapporteur’s opinion, Member States should use core indicators in the next round of the strategic reporting exercise in 2012-2013 to facilitate comparison at EU level.
Poleg tega bi morale države članice za izboljšanje skladnosti in kakovosti spremljanja napredka povečati strateško vsebino svojih poročil, Komisija pa bi morala pripraviti natančnejše smernice za izboljšanje kakovosti strateškega poročanja.
Furthermore, in order to enhance the coherence and quality of monitoring of the progress, Member States should increase the strategic content of their respective reports and the Commission should provide more detailed guidance to improve the quality of strategic reporting exercise.
S strateškim poročanjem naj bi se povečala odgovornost do javnosti glede dosežkov politike, zato je treba javnost bolj obveščati in ji predstaviti ugotovitve.
Reporting exercise is supposed to increase the accountability to the public on achievements of the policy; therefore presentation of findings needs more publicity.
Treba je tudi spodbujati izmenjavo izkušenj, da bi države članice lahko koristno uporabile dobro prakso, ki je pripomogla k doseganju pozitivnih rezultatov.
Moreover, exchange of experiences should be promoted so that Member States can benefit from good practices that contributed to the delivery of positive results.
Poročevalec opozarja na naslednje primere dobre prakse, ki izboljšujejo kakovost poročanja in povečujejo odgovornosti interesnih skupin v državah članicah:
Rapporteur highlights following good practices that contribute to enhanced quality of the reporting exercise and increased ownership of stakeholders within Member States:
· uporaba temeljnih kazalnikov,
· using core indicators,
· poročanje o učinkih in rezultatih,
· reporting on outputs and results,
· poročanje o sinergijah med nacionalnimi politikami in politikami EU,
· reporting on synergies between national policies and EU policies,
· organiziranje javnih razprav in posvetovanj z interesnimi skupinami,
· organising public debates and consultations with stakeholders,
· posredovanje poročil nacionalnim parlamentom za mnenje ter objava poročil na vladnih spletiščih.
· submitting the reports to national parliaments for opinion, and publishing the reports on governmental websites.
Razmišljanja in sklepi poročevalca
Reflections and Conclusions of the Rapporteur
Kohezijska politika še vedno dokazuje svojo pomembnost, saj znatno prispeva k izboljšanju socialno-ekonomskega okolja.
Cohesion policy continues to prove its relevance as it considerably contributes to the improvement of the socio-economic environment.
Države članice so pozitivno sprejele nove zahteve in napredujejo pri doseganju ciljev kohezijske politike, kar dokazujejo dejstva in podatki iz nacionalnih poročil, čeprav že v osnovi obstajajo razlike med državami in regijami.
The Member States have embraced new requirements in a positive way and they are making progress in delivering cohesion policy objectives, as evidenced by facts and figures provided in national reports - though with certain inherent heterogeneity at the level of states and regions.
Vendar je kohezijska politika dolgoročen mehanizem, kjer se večina rezultatov pokaže proti koncu programskega obdobja.
However, cohesion policy is a long-term mechanism and most of the results are visible later in the programming period.
Celotno sliko programskega obdobja 2007–2013 bomo tako imeli šele 2015, dve leti po drugem strateškem poročilu, saj imajo nekatere države še dve leti po 2013 čas, da porabijo vsa namenska sredstva.
Indeed, the full picture for the 2007 - 2013 programming period will be visible only in 2015, two years after the second Strategic Report, since certain countries have two years after 2013 to use all the committed funding.
Poročevalec poudarja dejstvo, da učinkovito izbiro in izvajanje projektov na nekaterih področjih zavirajo številni dejavniki, na primer pozen zaključek pogajanj o večletnem finančnem okviru in zakonodajnem svežnju za kohezijsko politiko, ki je povzročil zamude pri dokončanju nacionalnih strategij in operativnih programov, spremembe predpisov o finančnem nadzoru, premajhna javna sredstva za sofinanciranje v državah članicah, nejasne nacionalne prednostne naloge na nekaterih področjih delovanja ter pomanjkljiva institucionalna in upravna zmogljivost.
The Rapporteur draws attention to the fact that effective selection and implementation of projects in some areas is hampered by many factors, such as late conclusion of the negotiations on multi-annual financial framework and the legislative package of the policy resulting in belated completion of the national strategies and operational programmes, changes in the rules on financial control, scarce public resources available for co-financing in Member States as well as the lack of clear national priorities for certain areas of intervention, and deficient institutional administrative capacity.
Te dejavnike je treba nemudoma začeti reševati tako na ravni EU kot na ravni držav članic.
These factors need to be promptly addressed at both EU and Member States´ level.
Državam članicam svetujemo tudi, naj pospešijo in poenostavijo uporabo strukturnih skladov na terenu, zlasti naj sprejmejo korektivne ukrepe na področjih, kjer izvajanje ni učinkovito, ter se tako izognejo zamudam pri doseganju dogovorjenih rezultatov.
Member States are also advised to accelerate and facilitate the use of Structural Funds on the ground and especially to take corrective measures in the areas with weak performance to avoid late delivery of agreed results.
Seveda so glavni predpogoji za dosego skupnih ciljev kohezijske politike zdrava finančna disciplina in preglednost pri dodeljevanju sredstev.
Of course, key preconditions for achieving the overall objectives of cohesion policy are sound financial discipline and the transparency in the allocation of funds.
Strateško poročanje je nov instrument, ki pri tem lahko pomaga povečati odgovornost za doseganje ciljev politike.
The strategic reporting as a new instrument can contribute in this sense to increase the accountability in delivering policy objectives.
Še eno pomembno vprašanje, ki zagotavlja kakovost postopka odločanja, strateškega načrtovanja in uspešnost ter učinkovitost izvajanja kohezijske politike, je učinkovitost javne uprave.
Another important issue ensuring quality of the decision-making process, strategic planning as well as the successful and efficient implementation of cohesion policy, is the efficiency of public administration.
Zato je dobro upravljanje na evropski, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni treba dodatno okrepiti v skladu s Pogodbo in načelom partnerstva.
Therefore, good governance at European, national, regional and local level should be further strengthened in accordance with the Treaty and partnership principle.
Poenostavitev upravljanja in izvajanja kohezijske politike je še vedno zelo zaželjena, saj gotovo ne želimo, da bi se zaradi odvečne birokracije ali prezapletenih pravil in postopkov sredstva ne uporabila.
The simplification of the cohesion policy management and implementation remains highly desirable, because it is surely not welcome that due to superfluous bureaucracy, onerous rules and procedures funds remain unused.
Tako se absorpcija sredstev lahko poveča s ciljnim razvojem zmogljivosti in aktiviranjem vseh ustreznih državnih sredstev, da bi se pridobila razpoložljiva sredstva za sofinanciranje iz strukturnih skladov.
In this context, the absorption of the funds can be increased by targeted capacity building and by mobilising all appropriate national resources to obtain the available co-financing from the Structural funds.
Instrumenti finančnega inženiringa lahko prav tako nudijo potrebno podporo.
The instruments of financial engineering can also provide necessary support.
Kohezijska politika skuša zmanjšati neenakosti v razvoju evropskih regij, omogoča lažjo modernizacijo in trajnostno rast ter izkazuje evropsko solidarnost.
Finally, cohesion policy aims at reducing disparities between levels of development of European regions, facilitates the pursuit of modernisation and sustainable growth and demonstrates European solidarity.
S tem dokazuje, da je nujna za napredek evropske integracije, saj vzpostavlja močne sinergije med vsemi evropskimi politikami.
As such, it has proved to be essential to the progress of European integration while establishing strong synergies between all European policies.
Realnost kaže, da se evropske regije še vedno spopadajo z velikimi gospodarskimi, socialnimi in okoljskimi neenakostmi.
Reality shows that European regions are still facing striking economic, social and environmental disparities.
Nekatere so posledica zadnjih dveh širitev (pristop gospodarsko zapostavljenih držav), druge so se okrepile zaradi neposrednega vpliva svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize.
Some of them are consequences of the last two enlargements (accession of economically disadvantaged countries), other have been accentuated by the direct effects of the global financial and economic crisis.
Oblikovanje strukture prihodnje kohezijske politike za obdobje 2014–2020 bo osrednje vprašanje v politični razpravi v naslednjih letih.
The issue of the architecture of the future cohesion policy for the period 2014-2020 will be in the centre of the political debate in the next years.
Obstaja nevarnost, da se bodo pomanjkljivosti lizbonske strategije ponovile pri izvajanju strategije Evropa 2020.
The risk exists that shortcomings of the Lisbon Strategy could repeat themselves in the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy.
Ob bližajočih se pogajanjih za prihodnje programsko obdobje poročevalec ponovno poudarja, da se mora kohezijska politika tudi v prihodnje ukvarjati z vsemi evropskimi regijami in družbenimi izzivi ter hkrati pomagati bolj revnim pri odpravljanju zaostanka in doseči pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast.
The Rapporteur reiterates, in the context of upcoming negotiations for the future programming period, that the cohesion policy should continue to address all European regions and societal challenges, both helping the poorer ones to catch up, and delivering smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Poročevalec je prepričan tudi, da je pri doseganju socialne, ekonomske in teritorialne kohezije zaradi trajnih ozemeljskih neravnovesij in vztrajne krize nujna močna in finančno dobro podprta regionalna politika EU, zato se sredstva, dodeljena kohezijski politiki v naslednjem programskem obdobju definitivno ne smejo znižati.
Your Rapporteur also strongly believes that within the context of persisting territorial imbalances and a lingering crisis, strong and well-financed EU regional policy is a condition sine qua non for achieving social, economic and territorial cohesion, therefore the budget allocated for the cohesion policy in the next programming period should definitely not be decreased.
o poročilu o izvajanju programov kohezijske politike 2007–2013 za leto 2010
on the Report 2010 on the implementation of the Cohesion Policy programmes for 2007-2013
2. opozarja, da je bila z vidika proračuna do 1. julija 2010, ki je na polovici programskega obdobja 2007–2013, opravljena manj kot šestina plačil;
Recalls that, from a budgetary point of view, less than one sixth of the payments only had been made as at 1 July 2010, the midway point of the 2007-2013 programming period;
4. vseeno poudarja, da raven izvajanja še zdaleč ni enotna v vseh državah članicah, na vseh področjih delovanja in v vseh skladih; opozarja, da je konec leta 2010 največja razlika v stopnji plačil med državami članicami za ESRR in EKS skupaj znašala 247 %, za ESS pa 303 %;
Stresses, nevertheless, that the implementation rates are far from homogeneous across Member States, fields of intervention and Funds; recalls that in late 2010, the maximum difference in payment rates between Member States was 247% for the ERDF and the ECF considered together and 303% for the ESF;
6. zato zahteva, da se posebno pozornost usmeri v nadaljnje spodbujanje vzajemnega učenja, izmenjavo najboljše prakse ter krepitev upravnih zmogljivosti v nekaterih državah članicah, ter poziva k nadaljnjem razmisleku o tem, kako združiti različne veljavne zbirke pravil in nadzorne sisteme.
Requests, therefore, that specific attention be granted to the further promotion of mutual learning, exchange of best practices and reinforcement of administrative capacities in certain Member States, and calls for further reflection on how to streamline the various sets of rules and control arrangements applicable.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom Kohezijska politika: Strateško poročilo o izvajanju programov 2007–2013 za leto 2010 (KOM(2010) 110),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions ‘Cohesion policy: Strategic Report 2010 on the implementation of the programmes 2007-2013’ (COM (2010) 110,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu,
– having regard to Council Regulation No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast” KOM(2010)2020 ,
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission ‘Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM (2010) 2020),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o strateškem poročilu Komisije za 2010 o izvajanju programov kohezijske politike, sprejetih na 3023. seji Sveta za zunanje zadeve 14. junija 2010 v Luxembourgu,
– having regard to the Council conclusions on the Strategic Report of 2010 by the Commission on the implementation of the Cohesion Policy Programmes adopted at the 3023rd Foreign Affairs Council meeting in Luxembourg on 14 June 2010,
– ob upoštevanju člena 174 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije o razvoju dejavnosti, ki vodijo h krepitvi ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije Unije;
– having regard to Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the development of actions leading to the strengthening of the Union's economic, social and territorial cohesion,
A. ker je spodbujanje ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije ter solidarnosti med državami članicami med glavnimi cilji Evropske unije, kot je navedeno v členu 3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
A. whereas the promotion of economic, social and territorial cohesion and solidarity among Member States is one of the main objectives of the EU, as stated in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union,
B. ker mora biti kohezijska politika uspešno in učinkovito orodje za odziv na socialno-ekonomske izzive, ki jih je povzročila finančna kriza, ter za zmanjšanje razlik med stopnjami razvoja evropskih regij,
B. whereas cohesion policy needs to be an effective and efficient tool to respond to socio-economic challenges brought about by the financial crisis and to reduce disparities between the levels of development of European regions,
C. ker ima kohezijska politika ključno vlogo na poti k polnemu doseganju ciljev EU 2020, zlasti na področju zaposlovanja in socialnih zadev, na vseh ravneh upravljanja in na vseh geografskih območjih,
C. whereas cohesion policy plays a pivotal role on the way towards full achievement of the EU 2020 goals, in particular in the field of employment and social affairs, at all governance levels and in all geographical areas,
D. ker bi Evropski socialni sklad (ESS) moral zagotavljati polno zaposlenost in zaposlitvene možnosti, med drugim s spodbujanjem vključevanja delavcev na trg dela in krepitvijo socialne vključenosti;
D. whereas the European Social Fund (ESF) should ensure full employment and job opportunities, promoting, among other objectives, the integration of workers into the labour market and reinforcing social inclusion,
2. pričakuje, da bodo učinkovite in merljive pobude držav članic – ki se bodo financirale iz ESS – prispevale k uresničitvi cilja glede revščine v strategiji EU 2020;
Expects that efficient and quantifiable initiatives from the Member States – financed by the ESF – will contribute to the delivery of the poverty goal of the EU 2020 Strategy;
5. se strinja s priporočilom Komisije, da je treba boj proti revščini okrepiti; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je bilo spodbujanje spremljajočih ukrepov v zvezi s prednostno nalogo „vključevanja v družbo“ (člen 3(1)(c)(i) uredbe o ESS) uspešno pri podpori vključevanja posebej prikrajšanih oseb v družbo; zato poziva, naj ti spremljajoči ukrepi še naprej ostanejo ključna prvina Evropskega socialnega sklada;
Endorses the Commission's recommendation that the fight against poverty must be stepped up; points out in this connection that promoting flanking measures relating to the 'social integration' priority (Article 3(1)(c)(i) of the ESF Regulation) has proved effective in supporting the social integration of particularly disadvantaged people; therefore calls for such flanking measures to remain a key element of the European Social Fund;
8. obžaluje, da se v času, ko gospodarska in finančna kriza povečuje socialne razlike, dodeljevanje sredstev iz strukturnih skladov državam članicam zmanjšuje;
Regrets that, at a time when the economic and financial crisis is heightening social inequalities, the allocation of Structural Funds to the Member States is in decline;
15. priznava vlogo ESS pri doseganju socialnih ciljev in poziva Komisijo, naj nadalje spodbuja skladnost in povezave med ESS in različnimi okvirnimi programi, kot sta EQUAL in „Evropa za državljane“, da se vzpostavita boljše usklajevanje in sodelovanje med instrumenti politik EU;
Recognises the role of the ESF in achieving social objectives and asks the Commission to promote further coherence and links between the ESF and various framework programmes, such as EQUAL and ‘Europe for Citizens’, with a view to establishing better coordination and cooperation among EU policy instruments;
20. pričakuje tesnejše sodelovanje med Komisijo in državami članicami za hitrejši in učinkovitejši odziv na spremembe na trgu dela ter izvajanje nujnih, k rezultatom usmerjenih ukrepov;
Expects closer cooperation between the Commission and the Member States in order to react more quickly and efficiently to changes on the labour market and to implement necessary, result-oriented measures;
23. meni, da kohezijske politike ni mogoče imeti preprosto za sredstvo za uresničevanje ciljev drugih sektorskih politik, temveč gre za politiko Unije, ki zagotavlja znatno dodano vrednost in ima lasten smisel: ekonomsko in socialno kohezijo;
Takes the view that cohesion policy must not be seen as merely an instrument for achieving the objectives of other sectoral policies, since it is a Community policy offering substantial value added which has its own raison d'être: economic and social cohesion;
Pripravljavec mnenja: José Manuel Fernandes
Rapporteur: José Manuel Fernandes
2. poudarja, da raven naložb v okoljski sektor ne napreduje v skladu s pričakovanji, na kar kaže število izbranih projektov, ki ne presega 21 % skupnega števila projektov, predvidenega v programih;
Stresses that investment in the environmental sector is not progressing according to plan, as is illustrated by the volume of projects selected, which stands at no more than 21% of the total provided for in the programmes;