natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
B. ker številna digitalizirana dela, ki jih zdaj hranijo razne knjižnice, niso na voljo javnosti zaradi nezdružljivosti digitalnih formatov, in ker so knjižnice zaradi svojega osebja ustanove, ki so najbolj usposobljene za nadzor in upravljanje procesa digitalizacije del,
B. whereas large numbers of digitised works currently held by various libraries have not been made publicly available owing to incompatibilities between digital formats, and whereas, thanks to their staff, libraries are the institutions most qualified to supervise and manage the process of digitising works,
2. poudarja, da je treba zaradi koristi, ki jih bodo imeli vsi državljani EU od dostopa do Europeane, čim prej zagotoviti njeno razpoložljivost;
Emphasises that, in view of the benefits for all EU citizens of accessing ‘Europeana’, its availability in all the official languages should be envisaged as soon as possible;
5. spodbuja k objavi javnega razpisa, da se čim bolj učinkovito uskladi upravljanje Europeane, k določitvi jasnih in stvarnih ciljev ter po potrebi ponovni oceni tega postopka;
Suggests issuing a public call for tenders with a view to coordinating the administration of ‘Europeana’ as effectively as possible, defining clear, realistic objectives and re-evaluating the operation if necessary;
7. poziva Komisijo, naj določi pravila za standardni postopek objave nekega dela in posredovanje njegove digitalne različice nacionalnim arhivom, takoj ko gre delo v tisk, pri čemer nacionalni arhivi to vsebino ob doslednem spoštovanju avtorskih pravic dodajo v podatkovno bazo Europeana;
Asks the Commission to establish rules for a standard procedure for publishing a work and forwarding its digital version to the national archives at the same time as the work goes to the printers, with the national archives adding the content to the ‘Europeana’ database on a basis of strict respect for copyright;
10. priporoča Komisiji, naj preuči možnost, da bo v prihodnje ob upoštevanju vseh omejitev, ki izhajajo iz pravic intelektualne lastnine, obvezno dopolniti digitalno knjižnico z vsemi digitalnimi viri, nastalimi pri bodočih raziskovalnih razvojnih projektih, ki jih bo sofinancirala Evropska unija;
Recommends to the Commission that, in the future, it consider the option of making it a requirement that all digital resources developed under future research and development projects co-funded by the European Union be submitted to the ‘Europeana’ digital library, taking into account any restrictions arising from intellectual property rights;
13. poziva Komisijo in upravo, ki ima trenutno sedež na Nizozemskem, naj poskrbita za bistvene tehnične in estetske izboljšave Europeane ter pri tem preučita tudi težave s pridobivanjem in zagotavljanjem sredstev, ki jih knjižnice potrebujejo za izvajanje potrebnih digitalnih operacij;
Calls on the Commission and the current Dutch-based administration to make extensive technical and aesthetic improvements to ‘Europeana’, including an analysis of the difficulties involved in identifying and securing funds to enable libraries to carry out the necessary digitising operations;
16. priporoča Komisiji, naj razišče možnost ustanovitve evropskega organa, ki bi usklajeval sodelovanje nacionalnih organov pri spremljanju procesa digitalizacije, izplačevanje nadomestil za pravice avtorjem in druge pomembne vidike v zvezi s projektom Europeana;
Recommends to the Commission that it research the possibility of establishing a European body to coordinate the involvement of national authorities in monitoring the digitisation process, copyright payments to authors and other issues relevant to the ‘Europeana’ project;
19. priporoča Komisiji, naj vztraja pri standardnem elektronskem formatu digitaliziranih del, da zagotovi združljivost digitaliziranih dokumentov s spletnim vmesnikom in podatkovno bazo;
Recommends to the Commission that it insist on a standard electronic format for the digitised works, so as to ensure that the digitised documents are compatible with the online interface and the database;
o Europeani – naslednji koraki
on ‘Europeana – the next steps’
Pripravljavka mnenja: Marielle Gallo
Rapporteur: Marielle Gallo
5. poudarja, da je treba razmisliti, kako spodbuditi kulturne institucije, da na podlagi načrta za digitalizacijo z imetniki avtorskih pravic sklenejo sporazume o dostopnosti del za več ozemelj, in kako s sodelovanjem spletnih knjigotržcev podpirati razvoj konkurenčnega okolja, da se omogoči širjenje evropske kulturne dediščine po vsej celini;
Stresses the need to consider ways of encouraging cultural institutions, once they have drafted a digitisation plan, to conclude agreements with rights-holders to make works accessible on a multiterritory basis and to foster the development of a competitive environment with the participation of online booksellers, thus helping to spread Europe’s cultural heritage throughout the continent;
o politiki kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov: katera strategija je prava?
on Agricultural product quality policy: what strategy to follow?
Poročevalec: Giancarlo Scotta'
Rapporteur: Giancarlo Scotta'
OBRAZLOŽITVENA IZJAVA.................................................................................................14
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................14
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 28. maja 2009 o politiki kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov ( KOM(2009)0234 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission of 28 May 2009 on agricultural product quality policy ( COM(2009)0234 ),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 15. oktobra 2008 o kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov: proizvodni standardi, zahteve za kmetovanje in sheme kakovosti ( KOM(2008)0641 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s green paper of 15 October 2008 on agricultural product quality: product standards, farming requirements and quality schemes ( COM(2008)0641 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2009 o zagotavljanju kakovosti hrane, vključno z uskladitvijo ali vzajemnim priznavanjem standardov
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2009 on ensuring food quality including harmonisation or mutual recognition of standards
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije iz oktobra 2008 o shemah za potrjevanje kakovosti živil,
– having regard to the Commission staff working document of October 2008 on food quality certification schemes,
– ob upoštevanju sistematskega pregleda skupne kmetijske politike (SKP),
– having regard to the health check for the common agricultural policy (CAP),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenj Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0029/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinions of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7‑0029/2010 ),
A. ker ima Evropska unija najvišje standarde kakovosti živilskih proizvodov na svetu ter ker ti visoki standardi izpolnjujejo pričakovanja evropskih potrošnikov in so sredstvo za ustvarjanje večje dodane vrednosti,
A. whereas the European Union has the highest quality standards for food products in the world and these high standards are demanded by Europe’s consumers and represent a means of maximising added value,
B. ker se s podpiranjem malih in srednjih kmetij, ki s svojo proizvodnjo in porabo zadovoljujejo lokalne potrebe, podpirajo tradicionalne in empirične metode pridelovanja ter zagotavlja njihovo izvajanje v skladu z najvišjimi standardi kakovosti in varnosti;
B. whereas support for small and medium-sized farms, whose production and consumption levels meet local requirements, sustains both traditional and empirical farming methods and ensures they are applied in accordance with the highest standards of quality and safety,
C. ker so kakovostni evropski proizvodi del žive kulturne in gastronomske dediščine Evropske unije in so zato pomemben sestavni del gospodarskega in družbenega življenja mnogih evropskih regij, saj omogočajo dejavnosti, ki so zlasti na podeželskih območjih neposredno povezane z realnim stanjem lokalnih skupnosti,
C. whereas European quality products constitute a living cultural and gastronomic heritage for the Union and are an essential component of economic and social activity in many of Europe’s regions, bolstering activities directly linked to local realities, especially in rural areas,
D. ker obstoječa politika glede distribucijske verige vpliva na možnosti malih proizvajalcev za doseganje široke ciljne skupine;
D. whereas existing policy concerning the distribution chain affects small producers’ chances of reaching a wide target group,
E. ker potrošnike poleg varnosti hrane vedno bolj zanimajo tudi poreklo in metode proizvodnje živil; ker se je EU že odzvala na ta trend ter uvedla štiri sheme kakovosti in porekla živil, in sicer zaščiteno označbo porekla (ZOP), zaščiteno geografsko označbo (ZGO), zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnost (ZTP) in ekološko pridelano živilo,
E. whereas there is ever-increasing consumer interest not only in food safety but also in the origins and production methods of food products; whereas the EU has already responded to this trend by introducing four food quality and origin schemes, namely Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indication (PGI), Traditional Speciality Guaranteed (TSG) and Organic Farming,
F. ker potrošniki povezujejo te sheme potrjevanja z jamstvom za višjo kakovost,
F. whereas consumers associate these certification schemes with a guarantee of higher quality,
G. ker je nove tehnologije mogoče uporabiti za navedbo podrobnih informacij o poreklu in značilnostih kmetijskih in živilskih proizvodov,
G. whereas new technologies can be employed for providing detailed information on the origins and characteristics of agricultural and food products,
2. obžaluje, da sporočilo Komisije zaradi prizadevanja za poenostavitev, ki bi lahko delovala zaviralno, le deloma upošteva zahteve, ki so jih zainteresirani sektorji izrazili po objavi zelene knjige;
Regrets the fact that, on grounds of a simplification which could prove counterproductive, the Commission communication has only partially taken on board the requirements specified by the sectors concerned following the publication of the green paper;
5. poziva h krepitvi politike kakovosti EU, saj je ta za evropske proizvajalce pomembna spodbuda pri izboljšanju njihovih prizadevanj za kakovost, varnost hrane in varstvo okolja; meni, da lahko ta politika prispeva k bistvenemu povečanju dodane vrednosti evropske kmetijsko-živilske proizvodnje na vedno bolj globaliziranem trgu;
Calls for the strengthening of the EU quality policy, since it represents a significant incentive for producers in the Union to improve their efforts in terms of quality, food safety and respect for the environment; believes this policy can help to boost substantially the added value of the Union’s agricultural and food production in an ever more globalised market;
8. meni, da je na vedno bolj odprtem trgu nujno, da Unija pri pogajanjih v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji (STO) brani načelo o učinkoviti zaščiti kakovostnih proizvodov prek sistema varstva intelektualne lastnine;
Considers that, given the increasingly open market, it is essential that the EU uphold, in the WTO negotiations, the principle of quality products being protected effectively through the safeguard arrangements for intellectual property;
12. poudarja, da je treba določiti standarde kakovosti, ki zagotavljajo učinkovito komunikacijo s potrošniki o načinu pridobivanja proizvodov spodbujajo izboljšave teh standardov, s čimer prispevajo k doseganju širših ciljev politike EU;
Stresses the need for quality standards that ensure effective communication with consumers about the way that products have been produced and that offer incentives for improving these standards, thus contributing to wider EU policy objectives;
14. poudarja, da mora raznolikost ostati bogastvo Evrope ter da je treba priznati in zaščititi vse kakovostne proizvode, ki ustrezajo merilom, ki jih opredeli Unija; meni, da mora da SKP po letu 2013 podpirati politiko kakovosti in zlasti prizadevanja proizvajalcev za spodbujanje okolju prijaznejših načinov proizvodnje; ugotavlja, da so regije partnerice SKP ter da tudi sofinancirajo in upravljajo razvoj podeželja; dodaja, da so zaradi svoje zemljepisne bližine regije tudi partnerice proizvajalcev, zlasti proizvajalcev tradicionalnih in ekoloških proizvodov; meni, da bi se regije morale vključiti v proces priznavanja in spodbujanja proizvodov z označbo ter tradicionalnih in ekoloških proizvodov;
Stresses that diversity should continue to be Europe’s fundamental asset and that all quality products that meet the criteria laid down by the EU should be recognised and protected; considers that after 2013 the CAP should support the quality policy and, in particular, producers’ efforts to promote more environment-friendly production methods; points out that regions are the CAP’s partners and that they co-finance and manage rural development; adds that, by virtue of their geographical proximity, regions are the partners of producers and, in particular, producers of traditional and organic products; takes the view that regions should be involved in the recognition and promotion of products that carry an indication, traditional products and organic products;
Zahteve za kmetovanje in tržni standardi EU
EU farming requirements and marketing standards
17. meni, da kmetijski proizvodi Evropske unije sami po sebi izpolnjujejo standard kakovosti, saj se proizvajajo v skladu z zakonodajnimi določbami EU za kakovost proizvodov, trajnostno proizvodnjo ter okoljska in sanitarna merila (navzkrižna skladnost); poleg tega meni, da se s pridelavo kmetijskih proizvodov ohranjajo evropske kulturne krajine; trdi, da bi morala glede na to obstajati možnost uporabe oznake kakovosti „pridelano [proizvedeno, izdelano] v Evropi“;
Considers that EU agricultural products meet a quality standard in themselves, since they are produced in accordance with EU legislative provisions concerning product quality, sustainable production and environmental and health criteria (cross-compliance); in addition, the cultural landscapes of Europe are preserved through the cultivation of agricultural products; given these requirements, a ‘grown [produced or made] in Europe’ quality label should be a possibility;
21. meni, da je treba spodbujati prostovoljno označevanje okolju in živalim prijaznih načinov proizvodnje, kot so „integrirana pridelava“, „pašna reja“ in „hribovsko kmetijstvo“;
Believes it is necessary to promote the voluntary labelling of other environment-friendly and animal-friendly production methods, such as ‘integrated production’, ‘outdoor grazing’ and ‘hill farming’;
23. poziva Komisijo, naj začne preučevati možnost uvedbe kazalcev kakovosti v zvezi s socialnimi pogoji za proizvodnjo, npr. dohodki proizvajalcev in pogodbenimi obveznosti med proizvajalci, predelovalci in trgovci;
Calls on the Commission to launch a reflection process on the possibility of introducing quality indicators related to the social conditions of production, e.g. producers’ incomes and contractual relations between producers, processors and marketers;
26. opozarja, da so dodatne in specifične informacije prostovoljne ter da celotna označba ne sme biti prenatrpana; meni, da bi morala biti zlasti oznaka kakovosti EU v prvi vrsti jasno prepoznavna;
Points out that supplementary and specific information is voluntary and that the total labelling content must not be overloaded; takes the view that the EU quality label should remain clearly recognisable as a priority;
29. zahteva, naj poenostavitev standardov in krepitev verodostojnosti logotipa kakovosti EU dopolnita že obstoječe certifikate ter oznake lokalnega, regionalnega in nacionalnega porekla v državah članicah;
Requests that the simplification of standards and the enhancement of the credibility of the EU quality logo should complement already-existing certificates or designations of local, regional or national origin in the Member States;
Geografske označbe in tradicionalne posebnosti
Geographical indications and traditional special i ties
Ni treba ustvarjati novih vzporednih nacionalnih ali regionalnih sistemov, saj bi s tem nastale različne ravni zaščite; meni, da ni treba uvesti dodatnega sistema certificiranja živil na ravni Skupnosti, saj bi to razvrednotilo obstoječe sisteme in zmedlo potrošnike;
Believes that the current EU system for the protection of GI products should be maintained and that protection at EU level should be accorded to all GIs; also considers that parallel national or regional systems of recognition should not be established, as they could result in differing levels of protection; Takes the view that there is no need to introduce further Community-wide foodstuff certification systems, as this would devalue the existing systems and confuse consumers;
38. meni, da pri nobenem od teh dveh instrumentov ne bi smeli uvesti dodatnih meril v postopku registracije, temveč je treba stremeti k poenostavitvi; ugotavlja, da so trenutni postopki za registracijo zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb zapleteni in dolgotrajni.
Considers that no additional criteria should be added to the registration process for any of those instruments, but rather that the aim should be simplification; notes that the current procedures for registration of PDOs and PGIs are complex and lengthy; urges the Commission to find ways by which this process could be speeded up;39.
41. meni, da mora biti v primeru, ko se proizvod, ki je zaščiten z geografsko označbo, uporabi kot sestavina, organ, odgovoren za to označbo, ali drugi pristojni organ sposoben opredeliti pravila uporabe tega imena v prodajnih označbah predelanih proizvodov in da mora biti pooblaščen za izvajanje posebnih pregledov, ali so značilnosti, videz ali ugled proizvoda z geografsko označbo ostali nespremenjeni; meni, da mora Komisija oblikovati jasne smernice glede uporabe imen proizvodov z geografsko označbo, ki se uporabijo kot sestavine, na oznakah predelanega proizvoda, da bi se izognili vsakršnemu zavajanju potrošnika;
Considers that, where a product protected by a GI is used as an ingredient, the body responsible for the GI or the competent authority should be able to lay down rules governing the use of its name in the sales names of processed products, and should be authorised to carry out specific checks to verify that the GI product’s characteristics, image and reputation have not been adulterated; considers that the Commission should establish clear guidelines regarding use of the names of GI products used as ingredients on the labels of processed products, so as to avoid consumers being misled; 42.
44. zahteva, da temeljita zaščita geografskih označb po uradni dolžnosti postane obveznost upravnih organov v vseh državah članicah; izraža željo, da bi se to vprašanje posebej obravnavalo z revizijo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila
Further demands thorough ex-officio protection of GIs, as an obligation for authorities in all Member States; wishes to see this specifically addressed through a revision of Regulation (EC) 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
46. meni, da bi morala Komisija pretehtati možnost ustanovitve evropske baze znanja o starih receptih in zgodovinskih načinih priprave jedi, da bi preprečili izginjanje znanja o tradicionalnih jedeh in načinih priprave, ki se je prenašalo iz roda v rod;
Considers that, in order to prevent the disappearance of knowledge about traditional food and how it has been prepared for generations, the Commission should consider creating a European knowledge bank for old recipes and historical food preparation methods;
- v STO, s hkratno razširitvijo zaščite iz člena 23 sporazuma TRIPS na vse geografske označbe in z vzpostavitvijo pravno obvezujočega večstranskega registra geografskih označb; in
- in the WTO, both by extending protection under Article 23 of the TRIPS agreement to all GIs and by establishing a legally binding multilateral register for GIs, and
- v tretjih državah, s sklenitvijo dvostranskih sporazumov, zlasti z ekonomsko pomembnimi državami;
- in third countries, by negotiating bilateral agreements, in particular with economically significant countries;
- podpira namero Komisije, da geografske označbe vključi v trgovinski sporazum za boj proti ponarejanju in v delo prihodnje evropske opazovalne skupine za ponarejanje in piratstvo; ter
- supports the Commission’s aim to include geographical indications within the scope of the ‘Anti-counterfeiting trade agreement’ and in the work of the future ‘European observatory on counterfeiting and piracy’; and
- meni, da mora Komisija pred pričetkom trgovinskih pogajanj in med samimi pogajanji tesneje sodelovati z organi, ki predstavljajo proizvajalce izdelkov z geografsko označbo;
- considers that the Commission should work more closely with bodies representing GI producers prior to the launch of trade negotiations and during the negotiating process;
- meni, da je resničen napredek v zvezi z geografskimi označbami glavni pogoj za uravnotežen sporazum v okviru kmetijskih pogajanj pri STO;
- considers genuine progress regarding geographical indications to be an essential precondition for balanced agreement in the context of WTO agricultural negotiations; 50.
50. meni, da bi bilo treba okrepiti obveščanje in spodbujanje posebnega sistema zaščite geografskih označb; želi, da se Komisija še naprej zavzema za spodbujanje koncepta geografskih označb v tretjih državah, zlasti z večjo tehnično podporo v sodelovanju z evropskimi proizvajalci izdelkov z geografsko označbo in/ali organizacijami, ki jih predstavljajo;
Believes that it is essential to intensify information and promotion campaigns regarding the sui generis protection of GIs; calls on the Commission to continue to promote the GI concept with third countries, particularly by stepping up technical assistance missions in conjunction with European GI producers and/or their representative organisations;
Integrirana pridelava
Integrated production
56. poudarja, da imajo države članice in tudi EU dolžnost spodbujati kakovostne proizvode in jih zaščititi na mednarodni ravni; v zvezi s tem meni, da je treba strožje nadzirati ekološke proizvode iz tretjih držav zaradi poštene konkurence med ekološkimi proizvodi iz EU in iz tretjih držav;
Stresses that both the Member States and the EU have the duty to promote quality products and their protection at international level; believes, in this connection, that more stringent controls are needed on organic products from third countries, in the interests of fair competition between EU and third-country organic products;
– zagotoviti, da ekološki proizvodi iz tretjih držav izpolnjujejo enake zahteve kakor ekološki proizvodi iz Evropske unije ter da se pospeši nadzor nad izpolnjevanjem zahtev;
– ensure that organic products from third countries fulfil the same requirements as organic products from the EU and that monitoring for this is stepped up,
- navesti državo porekla na svežih in predelanih ekoloških proizvodih, uvoženih iz tretjih držav ne glede na to, ali se uporabi tudi logotip Skupnosti za ekološke proizvode,
- register the country of origin in the case of fresh and processed organic products imported from third countries, independently of whether the Community organic product logo is used,
- okrepiti verodostojnost evropskega logotipa s programi za spodbujanje prodaje ekoloških proizvodov, in
- enhance the credibility of the European logo by means of a programme to promote organic products, and
- jasno razločevati označevanje nekmetijskih proizvodov, ki se nanaša na metodo ekološke pridelave, od označevanja kmetijskih proizvodov ekološke pridelave;
- designate non-agricultural products referred to in connection with organic production methods in a manner distinct from the designation of organic agricultural products;