natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0223 . o strategiji EU 2020, svoje resolucije z dne 8. oktobra 2009
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0223 . on the EU 2020 Strategy, its resolution of 8 October 2009
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0028 . o srečanju na vrhu skupine G20 24. in 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu, svoje resolucije z dne 15. junija 2006
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0028 . on the Pittsburgh G-20 Summit of 24 and 25 September 2009, its resolution of 15 June 2006
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0272 . o revidirani strategiji trajnostnega razvoja in svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2008
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0272 . on the revised sustainable development strategy and its resolution of 24 April 2008
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0182 . o zeleni knjigi o tržnih instrumentih za namene okoljske politike in z njo povezanih politik,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0182 . on the Green Paper on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj odborov za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, za razvoj, za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0175/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Development, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0175/2011 ),
A. ker vse mednarodne ustanove vse bolj priznavajo, da je treba izboljšati podatke in kazalnike, ki bi dopolnjevali BDP pri merjenju celotnega družbenega razvoja,
A. whereas the need to improve data and indicators to complement GDP for overall societal development is increasingly recognised by all international institutions,
5. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za predstavitev indeksa obremenitve okolja, ki bi se ga predložilo poleg BDP in ki bo sprva zajemal naslednje glavne sklope okoljske politike: „podnebne spremembe in raba energije“, „narava in biotska raznovrstnost“, „onesnaževanje zraka in vplivi na zdravje“, „poraba vode in onesnaževanje“, „nastajanje odpadkov in raba virov“;
Welcomes the Commission initiative to present an index for environmental pressure, to be submitted alongside GDP, which will initially comprise the following major strands of environmental policy: ‘climate change and energy use’, ‘nature and biodiversity’, ‘air pollution and health impacts’, ‘water use and pollution’, ‘waste generation and use of resources’;
11. poudarja, da je izziv oblikovati jasen in razumljiv niz kazalnikov, ki bodo obenem teoretično skladni, politično ustrezni in empirično izmerljivi ter zagotavljali primerljivost med državami in regijami; poudarja, da je treba to narediti v tesnem sodelovanju z drugimi pomembnimi institucijami in organizacijami;
Emphasises that the challenge is to develop a clear and comprehensible set of indicators that are at the same time theoretically consistent, politically relevant and empirically measurable and ensure comparability between countries and regions; stresses the need for this work to be done in close cooperation with other relevant institutions and organisations;
V teku časa je BDP prevzel vlogo celostnega kazalnika narodnogospodarskega razvoja in splošnega napredka.
GDP has come to take on the role of a comprehensive indicator for overall societal development and progress in general.
Vendar pa ta kazalnik ne omogoča zanesljive podlage za politično razpravo v zvezi z vsemi vprašanji.
However, it does not provide a reliable basis for policy debate on every issue.
Zlasti BDP ne meri trajnostnosti na področju okolja niti socialne vključenosti.
In particular, GDP does not measure environmental sustainability or social integration.
Vedno bolj se uveljavlja spoznanje, da je treba izboljšati podatke in kazalnike za dopolnitev BDP.
There is increasing awareness of the need for improved data and indicators to complement GDP.
To spoznanje je v središču številnih mednarodnih pobud.
This awareness forms the basis of a number of international initiatives.
Novembra 2007 je Evropski parlament (skupaj z Evropsko komisijo, Rimskim klubom, WWF in OECD) organiziral konferenco z naslovom o preseganju BDP.
In November 2007 the European Parliament (together with the European Commission, the Club of Rome, the WWF and the OECD) held a conference entitled ‘Beyond GDP’.
Konferenca je pokazala močno podporo nosilcev političnih odločitev ter strokovnjakov s področij gospodarstva, okolja in civilne družbe razvoju kazalnikov, ki dopolnjujejo BDP in katerih cilj je zagotoviti celovitejše informacije za sprejemanje političnih odločitev.
At this conference there was broad support by policy-makers and experts from the fields of economics, environmental protection and civil society for the development of indicators to complement GDP, providing more comprehensive information to support policy-making.
V sporočilu Komisije „BDP in več – merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja“, so predlagani različni ukrepi, da bi se na ustrezen način dopolnil BDP.
In the Commission communication on ‘GDP and beyond – measuring progress in a changing world’, various measures are suggested as suitable ways to complement GDP.
Gre zlasti za to, da bi se razvili celovitejši kazalniki, ki bi zagotavljali zanesljivejšo bazo znanja.
In particular it focuses on developing more comprehensive indicators that would provide a more reliable knowledge base.
V svojem poročilu želim izrecno podpreti prizadevanja Komisije, da sprejme jasno določen sistem za merjenje, ki presega BDP, v smislu, da ga dopolnjuje v okviru sprejemanja odločitev in ocenjevanja.
In my report I should like basically to support the Commission’s intention to adopt a clearly defined measuring system that would go beyond GDP, in the sense that it complements GDP in the context of decision-making and assessment.
Menim, da cilj tega pristopa v več let potekajočih političnih in znanstvenih razpravah ni sporen.
My impression is that the aim of this approach is not controversial in the political and scientific discussion that has been going on for years.
Bolj vprašljivo je, kako lahko ta pristop uresničimo z uporabo jasno opredeljenih in merljivih kazalnikov.
Rather, the problem is how this approach can be done using clearly defined and quantifiable indicators.
Jasno je, da lahko ta projekt uspe le v primeru, če bo poudaril uporabo zanesljivih podatkov.
It is clear that this project can only succeed, if it emphasizes the use of reliable data.
Pogosto pa manjkajo jasno opredeljene informacije, podatki in kazalniki.
There is often a lack of clearly defined information, data and indicators.
Na ravni Unije in na ravni držav članic so bile predlagane številne pobude za odpravo pomanjkljivosti na teh področjih.
At EU and Member State level there have been many initiatives to fill the gaps in these areas.
Skladno ravnanje pa je žal mogoče zaznati samo deloma.
Unfortunately there are only partial signs of coherent action.
Na področju kazalnikov obstajajo na primer številne dejavnosti na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni, zaradi česar je postalo stanje neobvladljivo in nepregledno.
For example, the proliferation of activities at national and international level in the area of indicators has made the situation unmanageable and murky.
Poleg tega se pri celotni razpravi o kazalnikih ne sme pozabiti, da samo kazalniki ne morejo biti zadostna podlaga za politično razpravo, sprejemanje odločitev in ocenjevanje.
Moreover, in the general debate on indicators it should not be forgotten that indicators alone cannot make a sufficient contribution to policy debate, decision-making and assessment.
Potreben je celovit koncept, ki bo upošteval obstoječe ukrepe in ga bo mogoče uresničevati v praksi.
What is required is a comprehensive concept, taking account of existing measures, which can be implemented in practice.
Pomembno je, da oblikujemo orodje, ki bo dopolnjevalo BDP, pri tem pa upoštevati zahtevo, da bo moralo biti uporabno v praksi ter da mora vsebovati jasno opredeljene kazalnike in uporabljati visoko kakovostne podatke.
It is important that we develop a tool that can complement GDP, taking into account that it has to be done in a way so that it can have practical use and using clearly defined indicators and relying on data of a high quality.
Sporočilo Komisije predlaga vrsto posameznih ukrepov, ki jih je težko oceniti.
The Commission communication proposes a number of individual measures that are hard to assess.
Te pobude bi bilo treba vključiti v obsežnejšo stopnjevano strategijo, ki bi jasno pokazala, na kakšen način bi se lahko uporabil pristop, ki presega okvir BDP.
These initiatives are not integrated into a more comprehensive, tiered strategy that clearly shows how the new ‘Beyond GDP’ approach can be used.
To poročilo poziva Komisijo, naj predloži stopnjevano strategijo za pristop, ki presega okvir BDP, v kateri bo predstavila, kako je mogoče na praktičen način uporabiti novi pristop v vsakdanjem političnem delu.
My report calls on the Commission to submit a tiered strategy for the ‘Beyond GDP’ approach that should show how the new approach can be used pragmatically in day-to-day political work.
Dokler to vprašanje ni dorečeno, menim, da bo v tej razpravi težko doseči napredek.
Unless there is clarity on this issue, I consider that there can be little progress in this debate.
o BDP in več - Merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja
on GDP and beyond - Measuring progress in a changing world
Pripravljavec mnenja: Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis)
Rapporteur(*): Nikolaos Chountis
– ob upoštevanju Istanbulske deklaracije OECD z naslovom Merjenje in pospeševanje napredka družb, sprejete 30. junija 2007,
– having regard to the OECD Istanbul Declaration on ‘Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies’, adopted on 30 June 2007,
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za uredbo o evropskih okoljsko-gospodarskih računih (KOM(2010)132),
– having regard to the Commission proposal for a regulation on European environmental economic accounts (COM(2010)132),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o merjenju gospodarske uspešnosti in družbenega napredka (Stiglitzevo, Senovo in Fitoussijevo poročilo 2008),
– having regard to the report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi report 2008),
3. meni, da bodo nacionalne politike in politike EU ocenjene glede na to, ali so uspešne pri zagotavljanju napredka na področju doseganja socialnih, gospodarskih in okoljskih ciljev ter izboljšanja blaginje Evropejcev, in da kazalnik BDP ni ustrezen za merjenje kompleksne družbeno-gospodarske realnosti nacionalnih in geografskih izzivov; poudarja, da je uporaba novih ter dopolnilnih socialnih in okoljskih kazalnikov popolnoma v skladu s cilji strategije Evropa 2020 in drugih večjih pobud, ki jih ni mogoče doseči zgolj z uporabo kazalnika BDP;
Believes that national and EU policies will be evaluated in the light of whether they are successful in delivering progress in achieving social, economic and environmental goals and improving the well-being of Europeans, and that GDP is not sufficient to record the complex socioeconomic reality of the national and regional challenges; underlines that the use of new and complementary social and environmental indicators is fully in line with the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy and other major initiatives, which cannot be attained by using GDP alone as a yardstick;
5. ugotavlja, da ljudje pri ocenjevanju kakovosti svojega življenja cenijo na primer varno socialno okolje, kjer je lahko najti udobno nastanitev in zaposlitev, kjer je mogoče dobro vzgajati otroke, kjer je dobro poskrbljeno za integracijo tujcev, kjer so zagotovljene socialne storitve in je mogoče uživati v naravi, ki se nahaja v bližini, ter obžaluje, da je težko pridobiti primerljive podatke o teh vprašanjih;
Notes that when people are considering their quality of life they appreciate for example safe social environments where it is easy to find comfortable housing and jobs, which are good places to raise children, where for example integration of foreigners is taken good care of, where social services are provided and one may enjoy nature within reachable distances, and regrets that it is hard to get comparable data on these issues;
7. ugotavlja, da trdni empirični dokazi kažejo, da rast BDP po tem, ko ta doseže določeno vrednost, vedno manj vpliva na vzporedno izboljšanje življenjskega standarda in trajnosti;
Notes that strong empirical evidence shows that there is a threshold beyond which GDP growth is progressively decoupled from a parallel improvement in living standards and sustainability;
12. zato poziva Komisijo, naj ohrani BDP kot ključni kazalnik za načrtovanje ukrepov za povečanje blaginje in gospodarske uspešnosti ter na evropski ravni za ugotavljanje upravičenosti regij do pomoči, pri čemer morajo nacionalni organi ohraniti manevrski prostor, da lahko na ustrezni ravni uporabijo druge socialne, okoljske in infrastrukturne kazalnike, ki omogočajo upoštevanje posebnih okoliščin regij in mest ter uresničevanje ciljev strategije EU 2020;
Calls on the Commission, therefore, to retain GDP as the key indicator when planning measures to enhance prosperity and economic performance and to identify regions eligible for support on that basis at European level, in which connection national authorities must continue to be given the leeway to use other social, environmental and infrastructure-related indicators at the appropriate level, with a view to taking account of the specific circumstances of regions, towns and cities and meeting the objectives of the EU 2020 Strategy;
14. pozdravlja pripravljenost Komisije na sodelovanje z ostalimi vladnimi organizacijami, civilno družbo in raziskovalnimi centri; poudarja pomen vključitve državljanov v to pomembno razpravo in zagotavljanja svobodnih virov informacij, ki so lahko dostopni vsem državljanom, da bodo ti lahko razumeli dejanske vsebine različnih kazalnikov, način njihovega izračuna, njihove medsebojne povezave in kaj sploh merijo ter da bodo lahko spremljali njihov razvoj skozi čas; poziva Evropski parlament, naj skrbno spremlja prihodnji razvoj na tem področju;
Welcomes the willingness of the Commission to work in cooperation with other governmental organisations, civil society and research centres; recalls the importance of citizens’ involvement in this crucial debate and of providing free information sources that are easily available to all citizens so that the actual contents of different indicators, how they have been reached, their interconnections and what they actually measure, can be made understandable and their development over time can be followed; calls for the European Parliament to be closely associated in future developments on this topic;
16. ugotavlja pa, da bo razmislek o primernosti BDP kot edinem statističnem kazalniku in uvedbi dodatnih kazalnikov določil novo smer gospodarske politike na nacionalni ravni in ravni EU ter uvedel nove vidike v zvezi s kakovostjo razvoja in blaginjo za državljane.
Notes, however, that questioning GDP as the sole statistical indicator and introducing supplementary indicators will lead to economic policies at national and European level in new directions and introduce new aspects relating to the quality of development and the prosperity of citizens.
Burkhard Balz, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Elisa Ferreira, Vicky Ford, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Wolf Klinz, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Hans-Peter Martin, Arlene McCarthy, Alfredo Pallone, Ani Podimata (Anni Podimata), Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Burkhard Balz, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Chountis, George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Elisa Ferreira, Vicky Ford, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Wolf Klinz, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Hans-Peter Martin, Arlene McCarthy, Alfredo Pallone, Anni Podimata, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool
BDP in več: merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja
on GDP and beyond – Measuring progress in a changing world
Odbor za razvoj poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. upa, da bo predlog Komisije, da bi poleg čisto ekonomskih kazalnikov merili tudi okoljsko uspešnost, primerljiv in skladen z obstoječimi svetovnimi pobudami, na primer indeksom človeškega razvoja pri OZN;
Hopes that the Commission proposal to measure performance on environmental as well as purely economic indicators will be compatible and consistent with existing global initiatives, such as the UN Human Development Index;
5. pozdravlja pobudo BDP in več, ki so jo sprejele evropske institucije, da ne bodo več omejevale ukrepov v zvezi z bogastvom narodov in blaginjo državljanov;
Welcomes the initiative beyond GPD taken by the European institutions to stop limiting the way in which the wealth of nations and the wellbeing of citizens are measured;
Pripravljavka mnenja: Marian Harkin
Marian Harkin
– ob upoštevanju obstoječih statističnih instrumentov, ki krijejo nekatere razsežnosti socialnega napredka, blaginje in trajnostnega razvoja v Evropi, kot so Statistika Evropske unije o dohodkih in življenjskih pogojih, anketa o delovni sili, raziskave Eurobarometra, anketa o evropskih vrednotah in Evropski družbeni pregled,
– having regard to existing statistical instruments covering some dimensions of social progress, well-being and sustainable development in Europe such as the EU-SILC, the Labour Force Survey (LFS), Eurobarometers, the European Values Survey and the European Social Survey (ESS),
Raziskava o kakovosti življenja krije bistvena področja pojma kakovosti življenja: gospodarski viri, prikrajšanje; zdravje in dostop do zdravstvene nege; zaposlovanje in kakovost delovnih mest; ravnovesje med delom in zasebnim življenjem; družinski odnosi in podpora; socialna vključenost/izključenost (življenje v skupnosti in družbena udeležba); izobraževanje in usposabljanje; kakovost stanovanj in lokalno okolje; družbeni kapital in kakovost družbe; kakovost javnih storitev; subjektivna blaginja (vključno s srečo, zadovoljstvom z življenjem, optimizmom glede prihodnosti); ,
EQLS covers the following core domains of the quality of life concept: economic resources, deprivation; health and access to health care; employment and job quality; work-life balance; family relations and support; social inclusion/exclusion (community life and social participation); education and training; quality of housing and local environment; social capital and quality of society; quality of public services; subjective well-being (including happiness, life satisfaction, optimism about the future). ,
– ob upoštevanju Stiglitzevega poročila (poročilo Komisije za merjenje gospodarske storilnosti in družbenega napredka
– having regard to the Stiglitz Report (Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress
http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf ), ki ponuja pregled sedmih razsežnosti, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri razvoju novih kazalnikov,
http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf ), which provides an overview of the seven dimensions to be taken into account when developing new indicators,
A. ker je bruto domači proizvod (BDP), ki je sicer pomemben kazalnik gospodarske rasti, povsem neustrezno vodilo za politiko, ki želi biti kos izzivom 21. stoletja, je ob njem treba uporabiti še dodatne kazalnike, tudi tiste, ki merijo gospodarsko in socialno kohezijo ter okoljske kazalnike,
A. whereas GDP, while an important indicator of economic growth, is inadequate as a single instrument for guiding policy to meet the challenges of the 21st century, and requires additional indices including those that measure economic and social cohesion and environmental indicators,
B. ker finančna, gospodarska in družbena kriza kaže na to, da gospodarska strategija, ki temelji zgolj na BDP, ne omogoča razvoja trajnega modela, saj so ustrezne in popolne informacije o razvoju realnega dohodka gospodinjstev ter o stopnji gospodarskega razvoja in obstoječega socialnega napredka v gospodarstvi izjemno pomembne,
B. whereas the financial, economic and social crisis demonstrates that an economic strategy based purely on GDP does not make it possible to develop a sustainable model, therefore making it very necessary to have access to relevant and comprehensive information concerning the development of real household incomes,
C. ker revščina in socialna izključenost ogrožata človeško dostojanstvo in glede na trenutno stanje družbenega razvoja v Evropski uniji, pomeni napredek zlasti, da se za vse omogoči individualna in kolektivna politična, družbena in demokratična udeležba tako, da se odpravijo družbene delitve in revščine;
C. whereas, given that poverty and social exclusion are affronts to human dignity, progress at the present stage of social development in the European Union primarily means facilitating individual and collective political, social and democratic participation for all by eliminating social divisions and poverty,
D. ker gospodarska blaginja ni vedno povezana s socialnim napredkom, je za dosledno oblikovanje politike potreben podatkovni okvir, ki zajema bolj vključujoče kazalnike, ki pokrivajo socialne in okoljske pridobitve in izgube, ter indekse za merjenje trajnostnega razvoja in kakovosti življenja,
D. whereas economic wealth is not always related to social development, and therefore coherent policy-making needs a data framework that includes more inclusive indicators that incorporate social and environmental gains and losses alongside indices to measure sustainable development and quality of life,
Glede na zaključke Eurofound je povprečna stopnja splošnega zadovoljstva z življenjem v EU med zadnjim četrtletjem 2007 in septembrom 2009 padla za približno 4 %.
According to Eurofound’s findings, between the last quarter of 2007 and September 2009 the average level of satisfaction with life in general across the EU fell by about 4%.
Vzorec spremembe v zadovoljstvu z življenjem odseva spremembe BDP v državah, kot so baltske države, a ne ustreza relativno majhnim znižanjem BDP držav, kot sta Malta ali Francija.
The pattern of change in life satisfaction reflects changes in GDP in countries such as the Baltic States but does not correspond to the relatively small declines in GDP of countries such as Malta or France.
(Vir: Trends in quality of life in the EU: 2003-2009, Eurofound, 2010).
(Source: Trends in quality of life in the EU: 2003-2009, Eurofound, 2010).
Znotraj držav razlike v prihodkih in zaznana korupcija pomembno vplivajo na zaupanje v politične institucije.
Within countries, income differences and perceived corruption have a considerable impact on trust in political institutions.