natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Soglaša s tem, da bodo po oceni tveganj, ki jo bo pripravila EFSA, na trg dane le tiste arome, ki bodo uvrščene na pozitivno listo Skupnosti.
Your rapporteur supports the provision that, in accordance with the risk assessment to be carried out by the EFSA, only flavourings included on the Community positive list will be placed on the market.
Soglasje velja tudi za uvedbo postopka komitologije, ki bo zamenjal dosedanji postopek soodločanja.
Your rapporteur also agrees with the introduction of the comitology procedure, which will replace the current codecision procedure.
Sprememba je smiselna zlasti spričo novele komitološkega postopka, ki Evropskemu parlamentu odslej daje možnost vpogleda v postopek, če smatra, da je to potrebno.
This is a sensible change as the new comitology procedure now gives the European Parliament the possibility of examining a procedure if it believes that to be necessary.
2a) in dejansko zagotoviti možnost vpogleda Parlamenta v odločanje o vseh zadevah, ki jih navaja predlog Uredbe.
Given that the chemical structure of the molecules is identical, it was sensible to remove the distinction between ‘natural’ and ‘natural identical’ (i.e. synthetic) flavouring substances because as far as human consumption is concerned it is the safety of a substance that is important, not its origin.
Spričo identične kemične sestave molekul je bilo smiselno odpraviti delitev aromatičnih snovi na 'naravne' in 'naravno identične' (sintetične), saj je v človeški prehrani pomembna varnost snovi in ne njihovo poreklo.
However, removing the distinction in terms of the production method (by ‘natural’ process or by chemical synthesis) has not dealt with the ‘political’ question of consumer protection.
Vendar odprava delitve po načinu proizvodnje (z 'naravnim' procesom ali s kemično sintezo) ni odpravila "političnega" vprašanja zaščite potrošnikov.
Consumers want to know what basic ingredients a flavouring is composed of what processes were used to make it.
Slednji želijo vedeti, iz katerih osnovnih surovin so arome proizvedene in po kakšnih postopkih, zato zahtevajo jasno in razumljivo označevanje živil.
Therefore they are calling for clear and understandable food labelling.
Predlog Uredbe je tej zahtevi ugodil v členu 14, kjer je za trženje arome pod oznako 'naravna' določen najmanjši možni odstotek 'naravnih' aromatičnih sestavin, pridobljenih iz navedene večinske izhodne surovine.
The proposed regulation meets this demand in Article 14, which lays down the minimum percentage of ‘natural’ flavouring components obtained from the majority source material referred to in order for a flavouring to be sold with the description ‘natural’.
Zdi pa se, da člen 14 obvisi v zraku, če v členu 3, kjer so podane definicije, ni omenjena razlika med 'naravnimi' in 'naravno identičnimi' aromatičnimi snovmi.
However, Article 14 seems rather to stand in isolation given that there is no mention among the definitions in Article 3 of the difference between ‘natural’ and ‘natural identical’ flavouring substances.
S stališča dolgoročne skrbi za zdravje potrošnikov je relevantno vprašanje smiselnosti uporabe naraščajočega števila dodatkov za živila.
From the point of view of long-term consumer health a relevant question concerns the advisability of using an increasing number of food additives.
Uporaba zelo močnih arom, ki prekrijejo slabšo kvaliteto živil, se zato dotika aktualne strategije EU v boju proti debelosti.
The use of very strong flavourings which mask the poor quality of food touches on the EU’s current strategy to combat obesity.
S kombinacijami arom je mogoče prikriti za zdravje nekoristno sestavo predelanih živil (premastnih, presladkih, preslanih) oziroma slabo kakovost živilskih sestavin.
Using combinations of flavourings can cover up the unhealthy composition of processed foods (too much fat, sugar or salt) or the poor quality of food ingredients.
Okuse in vonje je mogoče poljubno okrepiti, povzročiti celo odvisnost potrošnikov od posameznih močno aromatiziranih proizvodov (oziroma blagovnih znamk) in jih odvrniti od prvotnih, 'naravnih' okusov in vonjev.
Tastes and odours can be strengthened and even make consumers dependent on certain strongly flavoured products (or brands) and turn them away from the original, ‘natural’ tastes and odours.
Vaša poročevalka je mnenja, da pri aromah ni dovolj upoštevati le toksikološke plati varnosti hrane, ki bo v okviru enotnega postopka odobritve zaupana EFSA, temveč je pomembna tudi ocena dejanske potrebe po dodajanju arom živilom.
Your rapporteur believes that in the case of flavourings it is not sufficient just to take into account the toxicological aspect of food safety, which under the standardised approval procedure will be the responsibility of the EFSA, but that it is also important to assess the actual need to add flavourings to food.
Če soglašamo, da obstaja povezava med prehranskimi navadami in vedno močnejšimi okusi in vonji pripravljene hrane, je pomembno opozoriti tudi na nujnost vzgoje potrošnikov.
If we agree that there is a link between eating habits and the increasingly strong tastes and odours of ready-made food, then it is also important to highlight the need to educate consumers.
S stališča zaščite njihovih dolgoročnih interesov je smiselno, da Uredba uvede kriterij prednosti in koristi uporabe arom za potrošnike.
From the point of view of protecting consumers’ long-term interests it is sensible for the regulation to introduce criteria relating to the advantages and benefits to consumers of using flavourings.
Potrošniki bi morali imeti tudi pravico do izbora.
Consumers should also have the right to choose.
Tistim, ki želijo uživati nearomatizirana živila, oziroma želijo uporabljati le arome, pridobljene iz 'naravnih' sestavin, morajo imeti to možnost.
Those who wish to consume unflavoured food, or who wish to use only flavourings obtained from ‘natural’ ingredients, should have the opportunity to do so.
Zagotovimo jo lahko z razumljivim označevanjem živil, ki je podlaga za obveščanje potrošnikov o prednostih manj aromatiziranih živil v povezavi z zdravimi prehranskimi navadami.
That opportunity can be provided by means of easily understandable food labelling, which is the basis for informing consumers about the advantages, in terms of healthy eating habits, of food with less flavouring.
Poročevalka soglaša tudi z uvedbo postopka avtorizacije arom, ki so pridobljene iz gensko spremenjenih organizmov.
Your rapporteur also agrees with the introduction of an authorisation procedure for flavourings obtained from genetically-modified organisms.
Arome in živilske sestavine z aromatičnimi lastnostmi
Flavourings and food ingredients with flavouring properties
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2000/53/ES o izrabljenih vozilih, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, as regards the implementing powers conferred to the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0922 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0922 )
UL C ... / Še ni objavljeno v UL. ,
OJ C... / Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 175(1) pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0006/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0006/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0186/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0186/2007 ),
ČLEN 1, TOČKA (1) (B)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1) (B)
Člen 4, odstavek 2, točka (b), pododstavek 2 (Direktiva 2000/53/ES)
Article 4, paragraph 2, point (b), subparagraph 2 (Directive 2000/53/EC)
Navedeni ukrepi za spremembo nebistvenih določb te direktive se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 11(3).
Those measures, designed to amend non essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 11 (3).
Ukrepi iz točk (i) do (iv) za spremembo nebistvenih določb te direktive se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 11(3).
The measures referred to in points (i) to (iv) , designed to amend non essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 11 (3).
Namen predloga spremembe je razjasniti področje uporabe regulativnega postopka s pregledom v členu 4(2)(b).
The amendment aims at clarifying the scope of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in Article 4 (2), point (b).
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7
ARTICLE 1, POINT (7)
Člen 11, odstavek 3 (Direktiva 2000/53/EC)
Article 11, paragraph 3 (Directive 2000/53/EC)
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporabljata člen 5a(1) do (4) in (5)(b) ter člen 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES ob upoštevanju določb člena 8 Sklepa.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1) to (4) and (5)(b) , and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Pri prilagoditvi direktive o izrabljenih vozilih revidiranemu Sklepu 1999/468/EGS o postopkih komitologije se v celoti upošteva nedavno sprejeti regulativni postopek s pregledom.
The adjustment of the end-of-life vehicles Directive to the revised Comitology Decision 1999/468/EEC shall take fully into account the newly introduced regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Sklicevanje na ta postopek bi moralo biti jasno in ne bi smelo pomeniti skrajšanja rokov v primerjavi z običajnimi roki v regulativnem postopku s pregledom.
The references to this procedure should be clear and not entail any curtailing of time limits compared to the standard time limits of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2000/53/ES o izrabljenih vozilih, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
End-of life vehicles (implementing powers conferred on the Commission
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/95/ES o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, as regards the implementing powers conferred to the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0915 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0915 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 95 pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0021/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0021/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0187/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0187/2007 ),
Člen 5, odstavek 1, pododstavek 2 (Direktiva 2002/95/ES)
Article 5, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 (Directive 2002/95/EC)
Ukrepi iz prvega pododstavka za spremembo nebistvenih določb te direktive se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 7(2).
The measures referred to in the first subparagraph , designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(2).
Ukrepi iz točk (a) do (c) za spremembo nebistvenih določb te direktive se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 7(2).
The measures referred to in points (a) to (c), designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(2).
Namen predloga spremembe je razjasniti področje uporabe regulativnega postopka s pregledom iz člena 5(1).
This amendment aims at clarifying the scope of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in Article 5(1).
Pri prilagoditvi Direktive 2002/95/ES o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi revidiranemu Sklepu 1999/468/EGS o postopkih komitologije se v celoti upošteva nedavno sprejeti regulativni postopek s pregledom.
The adjustment of the Directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment to the revised Comitology Decision 1999/468/EEC shall take fully into account the newly introduced regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Sklicevanje na ta postopek bi moralo biti jasno in vključevati običajne roke.
The references to this procedure should be clear and include the standard time limits.
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/95/ES o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
Hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (implementing powers conferred on the Commission)
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENT A
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/96/ES o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi (OEEO), kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), as regards the implementing powers conferred to the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0914 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0914 )
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija predlog predložila Parlamentu ( C6‑0019/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0019/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0188/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0188/2007 ),
Člen 14, odstavek 3 (Direktiva 2000/96 ES)
Article 14, paragraph 3 (Directive 2000/96/EC)
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporabljata člen 5a(1) do (4) in (5)(a) ter člen 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES, ob upoštevanju določb člena 8 Sklepa.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1) to (4) and (5)(a), and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Pri prilagoditvi direktive o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi revidiranemu Sklepu 1999/468/EGS o postopkih komitologije se v celoti upošteva nedavno sprejeti regulativni postopek s pregledom.
The adjustment of the waste electrical and electronic equipment Directive to the revised Comitology Decision 1999/468/EEC shall take fully into account the newly introduced regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Sklicevanje na ta postopek bi moralo biti jasno in ne bi smelo pomeniti podaljšanja rokov v primerjavi z običajnimi roki v regulativnem postopku s pregledom.
The references to this procedure should be clear and not entail any extension of time limits compared to the standard time limits of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/96/ES o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi (OEEO), kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (implementing powers conferred on the Commission)
o predlogu spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 2/2007 za proračunsko leto 2007
on Draft amending budget No 2/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007
o predlogu spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 2/2007 za proračunsko leto 2007, Oddelek III – Komisija
on Draft amending budget No 2/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007, Section III – Commission
1). zlasti členov 37 in 38 te uredbe,
1). , and in particular Articles 37 and 38 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, kot je bil dokončno sprejet 14. decembra 2006,
– having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007, as finally adopted on 14 December 2006
UL L 77, 16.3.2007.
OJ L 77, 16.3.2007. ,
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju,
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne ... o uporabi sredstev v višini 24.370.114 EUR iz Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije za dodelitev finančne pomoči Madžarski in Grčiji, da bi tema državama pomagali odpraviti veliko škodo, ki so jo povzročile poplave marca in aprila 2006,
– having regard to the decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to the amount of EUR 24 370 114 to grant financial assistance to Hungary and Greece in order to help those countries to cope with the severe damage caused by floods in March and April 2006,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 2/2007 za proračunsko leto 2007, ki ga je Komisija predložila 28. marca 2007 ( KOM(2007)0148 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 2/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007, which the Commission presented on 28 March 2007 ( COM(2007)0148 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe proračuna št. 2/2007, ki ga je Svet pripravil 7. maja 2007 (9254/2007 – C6‑0130/2007 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 2/2007, which the Council established on 7 May 2007 (9254/2007 – C6‑0130/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0189/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0189/2007 ),
A. ker bi morala Evropska unija pokazati solidarnost s prebivalci regij v državah članicah, ki so jih prizadele naravne nesreče, katerih posledice so močno poslabšale življenjske razmere, naravno okolje in gospodarstvo,
A. whereas the European Union should show its solidarity with the population of regions of Member States affected by natural disasters which have serious repercussions on living conditions, the natural environment or the economy,
B. ker so bila ustrezna proračunska sredstva za finančno pomoč Evropske unije uporabljena v skladu z določbami Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije in medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006, ki ureja njegovo financiranje,
B. whereas the appropriate budgetary resources for the European Union's financial assistance have been mobilised in accordance with the provisions of the European Union Solidarity Fund and of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 relating to its financing,
C. ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 2/2007 formalna vključitev teh proračunskih virov v proračun 2007,
C. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 2/2007 is to formally enter these budgetary resources in the 2007 budget,
Marca in aprila 2006 so večji del srednje, jugovzhodne in južne Evrope prizadele hude poplave, ki so v številnih državah povzročile veliko škodo.
In March and April 2006 severe floods hit large parts of central, south-eastern and southern Europe causing severe damage in a number of countries.
Madžarska in Grčija sta zaradi poplav zaprosili za finančno pomoč iz Solidarnostnega sklada EU v predvidenem roku desetih tednov, ki ga določa člen 4 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002.
Hungary and Greece applied for financial assistance from the EU Solidarity Fund relating to the floods within the ten week deadline set by Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (UL L 311, 14.11.2002).
Council Regulation (EC) N° 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (OJ L 311, 14.11.2002). .
Predhodni predlog spremembe proračuna zadeva dva elementa:
This Preliminary Draft Amending Budget concerns two elements:
– a) uporabo Solidarnostnega sklada EU za poplave, ki so prizadele Madžarsko in Grčijo marca in aprila 2006;
– a) The mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund for the floods that hit Hungary and Greece in March and April 2006;
– b) spremembo sestave proračuna za raziskave za leto 2007 zaradi sprejetja sedmega okvirnega programa.
– b) The modification of the structure of the Budget 2007 for Research , following the adoption of the 7th Framework Programme (FP7).
Čeprav se bodo zato odobritve za prevzem obveznosti povečale za 24,4 milijona EUR, se skupni znesek odobritev plačil ne bo spremenil.
While the overall impact on commitment appropriations will be an increase of EUR 24.4 million, the overall level of payment appropriations will not change.
ad a) Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije
ad a) EU Solidarity Fund
V letu 2007 za prejšnje vloge še niso bila namenjena sredstva, zato ostaja na voljo ena milijarda EUR.
In 2007, no resources have yet been earmarked for earlier applications leaving EUR 1 billion available.
Komisija je dodelitev sredstev v okviru sklada utemeljila na podatkih, ki sta jih posredovali prosilki.
The Commission’s proposed allocation under the Fund is based on the information made available by the applicants.
Predlaga dodelitev naslednjih zneskov:
The Commission proposes to grant the following amounts:
Skupni znesek predlagane pomoči
Total amount of aid proposed
Madžarska: Poplave aprila 2006
Hungary: Floods April 2006
Grčija: Poplave marca 2006
Greece: Floods March 2006
Po dodelitvi tega zneska nadomestila bo ostalo na voljo vsaj še 25 % sredstev Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije, ki jih bo mogoče dodeliti v zadnjem četrtletju leta, kakor predvideva člen 4(2) uredbe št. 2012/2002.
This amount of compensation will leave at least 25 % of the European Union Solidarity Fund available for allocation during the last quarter of the year, as required by Article 4(2) of Regulation 2012/2002.
Znesek 24 milijonov EUR bi se torej prerazporedil iz proračunske vrstice 02 04 01 v proračunsko vrstico 13 06 01, da bi se pokrile ustrezne potrebe v zvezi s financiranjem iz Solidarnostnega sklada EU (glej tabelo spodaj).
An amount of EUR 24 million would thus be allocated from budget line 02 04 01 to budget line 13 06 01 to cover the corresponding needs related to the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund (see table below).
ad (b) Sestava proračuna za raziskave za leto 2007
ad b) The structure of the Budget 2007 for Research
Komisija predlaga spremembo sestave proračuna za raziskave za leto 2007 zaradi sprejetja 7. okvirnega programa.
The Commission proposes a modification of the structure of the Budget 2007 for the Research, following the adoption of FP7.
Pravna podlaga za sedmi okvirni program je bila sprejeta konec leta 2006.
The legal base of the 7th Framework Programme (FP7) was adopted at the end of 2006
Sklep št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, UL L 412 z dne 30.12.2006.
Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, OJ L 412 of 30.12.2006. .