natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega Evropska centralna banka ob konsolidiranem tedenskem finančnem poročilu objavlja številne druge publikacije v zvezi s svojimi nalogami, vključno s polletnim poročilom o finančni stabilnosti in letnim poročilom o finančnem povezovanju.
Finally, apart from the consolidated Weekly Financial Statement, the ECB publishes a range of other task-related publications, including its bi-annual Financial Stability Report and its annual Financial Integration Report.
Kako ocenjujete postopek zamenjave članov odbora ECB?
How do you judge the procedure used to replace ECB board members?
Ali naj ne bi predvidena demokratična odgovornost in preglednost pomenili, da Evropski parlament dobi vsaj formalno možnost, da se mu predstavi več možnih kandidatov in poda svoje mnenje, preden se Svet dokončno odloči o imenovanju?
Should ex ante democratic accountability and transparency not imply that the European Parliament at least be formally given the possibility to hear several potential candidates and give its opinion before Council makes the final decision about the nomination?
Postopek izbora članov izvršilnega odbora ECB je določen v členu 283 Pogodbe in členu 11 statuta ESCB in ECB.
The procedure to select members of the ECB Executive Board is set out in Article 283 of the Treaty and Article 11 of the ESCB and ECB Statute.
V zadnji reviziji Pogodbe so se o njem sporazumeli vsi podpisniki in je del veljavne evropske zakonodaje.
It has been agreed by all signatories in the most recent Treaty revision and is effective European law.
Kot kandidat za izvršilni odbor ECB sem predmet tega postopka in ne zdi se mi primerno ocenjevati njegovo ustreznost.
As a candidate for the ECB Executive Board I am subject to that procedure and do not consider it appropriate to comment on its suitability.
Kakšen je vaš sklep, če primerjate politiki preglednosti, ki jima sledita Ameriška centralna banka in ECB?
What conclusions do you draw from the comparison between the transparency policies followed by the Federal Reserve Bank and by the ECB?
Kateri od obeh možnosti dajete prednost: objavi zapisnikov dva tedna po sprejetju odločitev o monetarni politiki, kot to prakticirata Fed in Bank of England, ali tiskovni konferenci, ki takoj sledi odločitvam o monetarni politiki, skupaj s takojšnjo objavo obrazložitve teh odločitev na internetu, kot to izvaja ECB?
Which alternative would you prefer: the publication of the minutes two weeks after monetary policy decisions were taken, such as practiced by the Fed and the Bank of England, or the press conference that immediately follows monetary policy decisions in addition to the instant publication on the internet of the reasoning behind the decision, such as done by the ECB?
Primerjava različnih pristopov je zahtevno početje.
A comparison across different approaches is a complex undertaking.
Eden od razlogov za to je, da lahko imajo centralne banke zaradi svojih značilnih zgodovin in kultur, ciljev politike in ostalih elementov v institucionalnih okvirih različne potrebe.
One of the reasons is that central banks may have different needs owing to their specific histories and cultures, their policy objectives and other elements in their institutional frameworks.
Iz raziskav, ki so na voljo, kot grob zaključek sledi, da je način, kako centralne banke danes sprejemajo odločitve o monetarni politiki, veliko jasnejši in bolj pregleden kot v prejšnjih desetletjih.
As a robust conclusion from available research, it has emerged that the way in which central banks nowadays take monetary policy decisions is much clearer and more transparent than in previous decades.
S tem se je učinkovitost monetarne politike na globalni ravni zvečala.
Thereby, effectiveness of monetary policy has been enhanced on a global scale.
Obstajajo različne možnosti, kako biti pregleden.
There are different ways of being transparent.
Zaradi naslednjih razlogov sem prepričan, da je pristop ECB eden od najnaprednejših na svetu.
For the following reasons I am convinced that the ECB’s approach is one of the most advanced in the world.
Prvič, zelo je pregleden glede povezanosti med strategijo monetarne politike in razlogi za ukrepe.
First, it is very transparent regarding the link between its monetary policy strategy and the reasons for its actions.
Drugič, tiskovna konferenca in uvodna izjava sta koristni orodji za širjenje pomembnih informacij med raznoliko poslušalstvo.
Second, the Press Conference and the Introductory Statement are useful tools to disseminate important information to a heterogeneous audience.
Zainteresiranim stranem (npr. splošni javnosti, medijem in opazovalcem finančnih trgov) nudita razumljiv izbor relevantnih informacij o odločitvah ECB o monetarni politiki.
They provide interested parties (e.g. the general public, the media, and financial market observers) with a comprehensive set of relevant information on the ECB’s monetary policy decisions.
Prizadevata si pojasniti skupno stališče Sveta ECB o naravnanosti monetarne politike.
They aim at explaining the collective view of the Governing Council on the monetary policy stance.
Tretjič, uvodna izjava in vprašanja ter odgovori na tiskovni konferenci so objavljeni v realnem času.
Third, the Introductory Statement and the Questions and Answers at the press conference are published in real-time.
To v primeru objave zapisnikov ne bi bilo dosegljivo.
This feature would not be achievable with the publication of minutes.
Gledano v celoti, se mi zdi praksa ECB zahtevna za vse člane Sveta ECB.
Overall, I regard the ECB’s practice as demanding for all members of the Governing Council.
Prav tako menim, da je do danes pristop ECB že široko razumljen in da je objava zapisnikov, ki se je poslužujejo druge centralne banke, zanje prav tako popolnoma smiselna.
I also believe that the ECB’s approach is widely understood by now, and that the publication of minutes by other central banks makes perfect sense for them as well.
Kakšno je vaše mnenje o četrtletnem monetarnem dialogu med Evropskim parlamentom in predsednikom ECB?
What’s your opinion of the quarterly Monetary Dialogue between the European Parliament and the ECB President?
Vidite kakšne možnosti za izboljšanje monetarnega dialoga?
Do you see any room for improvement in the Monetary Dialogue?
Ali pogoste razprave v zvezi s politikami ECB z drugimi političnimi akterji škodijo neodvisnosti banke?
Do the frequent discussions concerning the ECB’s policies with other political actors harm the bank’s independence?
Redni dialog z Evropskim parlamentom je del demokratične odgovornosti Evropske centralne banke evropskim državljanom in njihovim neposredno izvoljenim predstavnikom.
The regular dialogue with the European Parliament is part of the democratic accountability of the European Central Bank to the European citizens and their directly elected representatives.
V skladu s tem predstavljajo četrtletna srečanja med predsednikom ECB in Odborom za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve zelo pomemben prispevek k sprejetosti monetarne politike ECB v javnosti.
In this context, the quarterly meetings between the President of the ECB and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs represent a very important contribution to the public acceptance of the ECB’s monetary policy.
Skupaj z dodatnimi nastopi, tudi drugih članov izvršilnega odbora, ta medsebojni vpliv prispeva k poglobljeni in produktivni izmenjavi mnenj.
Together with additional appearances, also by other Executive Board Members, this interaction contributes to a deep and productive exchange of views.
ECB tudi zagotavlja zelo dragocen forum za razlaganje svoje monetarne politike in sprejemanje povratnih informacij.
It also provides the ECB with a very valuable forum to explain its monetary policy and to receive feedback.
To velja tudi za plenarna zasedanja Evropskega parlamenta, kjer predsednik ECB med drugim predstavi letno poročilo Banke.
This extends to the EP Plenary where, inter alia, the ECB President presents the Bank’s Annual Report.
Kakovost dialoga med ECB in Evropskim parlamentom je na zelo visoki ravni.
The quality of the dialogue between the ECB and the EP is of a very high standard.
To sta obe instituciji v preteklosti že večkrat potrdili.
This has been acknowledged by both institutions on several occasions in the past.
Redno izmenjavo informacij z ostalimi političnimi akterji razumem kot zelo pomemben element našega okvira politike v EMU.
I consider the regular exchange of information with other policy actors as a very important element of our policy framework in EMU.
V skladu s tem ECB redno vzajemno sodeluje s številnimi evropskimi institucijami.
In this context, the ECB interacts with a number of European institutions on a regular basis.
ECB je denimo vabljena na srečanja Euroskupine in Ekonomsko-finančnega sveta.
For example, the ECB is invited to the meetings of the Eurogroup and the ECOFIN Council.
Redno se udeležuje srečanj makroekonomskega dialoga.
It regularly participates in the meetings of the Macroeconomic Dialogue.
Potekajo tudi medsebojna sodelovanja na tehnični ravni s Komisijo in nacionalnimi vladami, na primer v Ekonomsko-finančnem odboru in v Odboru za ekonomsko politiko Evropske unije.
Interaction at technical level with the Commission and national governments also take place, for example, in the Economic and Financial Committee and the Economic Policy Committee of the EU.
Vse te izmenjave mnenj potekajo v skladu z določili Pogodbe ter tako zagotavljajo in vedno upoštevajo popolno neodvisnost Evropske centralne banke in hkrati podpirajo ustrezno delovanje EMU.
All these exchanges of views take place according to the provisions of the Treaty, thereby ensuring and always respecting the full independence of the ECB while at the same time supporting the proper functioning of EMU.
Tako so nujne in zaželene natanko zato, ker prepoznavajo neodvisnost ECB.
They are therefore necessary and desirable precisely because they recognise the independence of the ECB.
Bi morala biti ECB podvržena celovitim pregledom Evropskega računskega sodišča, usmerjenim tudi v področja zunaj koncepta „učinkovitosti“ (člen 27.2 statuta ESCB in ECB)?
Should the ECB be subject to a full scrutiny of the European Court of Auditors going beyond the concept of “operational efficiency” (Article 27.2 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB)
Upravljanje ECB je podvrženo celostnemu okviru zunanjih in notranjih nadzorov, katerih večina elementov je po naravi določena s statutom.
The ECB’s corporate governance is subject to a comprehensive framework of external and internal controls most elements of which are statutory in nature.
Pregled učinkovitosti upravljanja ECB, ki ga izvaja Računsko sodišče, je eden od pomembnih elementov tega nadzornega okvira.
The examination of the operational efficiency of the management of the ECB by the Court of Auditors is one important element of this control framework.
V ta okvir spada še obveznost rednega poročanja Evropskemu parlamentu in splošni javnosti kot tudi sodni nadzor, ki ga izvaja Sodišče Evropske unije.
This framework is complemented by regular reporting obligation to the European Parliament and the general public as well as judicial control by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Vsi ti elementi so bili oblikovani tudi v luči zagotavljanja neodvisnosti Centralne banke.
All these elements have been set up also in the light of the guarantee of central bank independence.
Neodvisnost ECB se nanaša tudi na njena finančna sredstva.
The independence of the ECB extends also to its financial resources.
Iz tega sledi, da ni potrebe, da bi se nadzor s strani Računskega sodišča razširil na področja zunaj koncepta učinkovitosti.
From this it follows that there is no need to extend the control by the Court of Auditors beyond the concept of operational efficiency.
Katera so po vašem mnenju najpomembnejša tveganja in izzivi, ki čakajo ECB?
What do you see as the most important risks and challenges facing the ECB?
Kar zadeva poglavitne izzive in tveganja, s katerimi se sooča ECB, naj se na tem mestu omejim na tri:
As regards main challenges and risks facing the ECB, let me restrict myself here to three of them:
izvajanje naše izhodne strategije je izziv brez primere, s potrebo po zagotavljanju postopnosti pri odpravi nestandardnih ukrepov ECB.
The implementation of our exit strategy is an unprecedented challenge, with a need to ensure gradualism in the withdrawal of the ECB non-standard measures.
Prevladujoča negotovost na trgu pa pomeni, da je izbira ustrezne hitrosti in obsega izhoda še naprej zahtevna naloga.
Prevailing market uncertainty, however, means that determining the appropriate pace and scale of the exit continues to be a demanding task.
Menim, da so bili ukrepi izhodne strategije, ki jih je ECB izvedla doslej, popolnoma ustrezni in utemeljeni z oceno razmer na ekonomskem in finančnem trgu.
I feel that the exit strategy measures taken to date by the ECB have been fully appropriate and justified by the assessment of economic and financial market conditions.
V prihodnje bo potrebna velika mera pazljivosti, saj je zgodovina okrevanj po hudih bančnih in gospodarskih krizah pokazala, da nas lahko napake zelo veliko stanejo.
Great care is needed going ahead, as the costs of errors can be very high, as the history of recovering from severe banking and economic crises has shown.
Drug izziv, ki bi ga želel osvetliti, je ustanovitev in delovanje Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja, ki mu bo ECB nudila podporo.
Another challenge I would like to highlight is the establishment and operation of the ESRB, for which the ECB will offer support.
Ta naloga je intelektualno zahtevna, saj bo treba razviti nova orodja za oceno makro-bonitetnega tveganja, medtem ko se v ta namen lahko uporabljajo tudi že obstoječa orodja.
Intellectually, this task is challenging as new tools need to be developed for the assessment of macro-prudential risk, while existing tools can also be used for this purpose.
Nadalje moramo zaradi prekrivanj med Generalnim svetom in Svetom ECB na eni in novim generalnim odborom Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja na drugi strani, kar zadeva sestavo obeh teles, zagotoviti zadostno in dosledno komunikacijo.
Furthermore, given overlaps between the ECB’s General and Governing Councils and the new General Board of the ESRB as regards the composition of the both bodies, we need to ensure adequate and consistent communication.
Še posebej je treba poudariti, da ne obstaja kompromis med ciljem stabilnosti cen in podporo, ki jo lahko ECB nudi pri izpolnjevanju drugih ciljev, vključno s finančno stabilnostjo.
In particular, it needs to be emphasised that there is no trade-off between the objective of price stability and the support that the ECB can lend to other goals including financial stability.
Nazadnje so tu še na primer organizacijska vprašanja, kot je to, kako v trenutno organizacijo ECB vključiti funkcijo njene podpore Evropskemu odboru za sistemska tveganja.
Finally, there are, for instance, organisational issues, such as how to embed the ESRB support function in the ECB’s current organisation.
Kot zadnjega naj omenim izziv, ki izvira iz pritiskov zaradi neravnovesij v številnih državah članicah.
Finally, let me mention the challenge stemming from the pressures created by the existing imbalances in several member countries.
Ta je naloga držav samih in vseh evropskih institucij z odgovornostmi pri upravljanju monetarne unije, vendar mora vključevati tudi aktivno vlogo ECB.
This is a problem for the countries themselves and for all European institutions with responsibilities in the management of monetary union but must involve also an active role for the ECB.
Kot sem opozoril že prej, obstaja samo ena monetarna politika za euroobmočje kot celoto, vendar je tu tudi poslanstvo ECB, da prispeva k analizi konkurenčnosti in razlik znotraj območja, kar državam samim pomaga pri oblikovanju in izvajanju ustreznih politik.
As I recalled before, there is only one monetary policy for the euro area as a whole, but there is also a mission for the ECB in contributing to the analysis of competitiveness and divergences within the area helping the countries themselves to device and implement the appropriate policies.
Članstvo v Evropski uniji pomeni za zadevne države ugodnosti, a tudi obveznosti.
Being member of the European Union creates benefits for the countries concerned but also obligations.
To še toliko bolj velja za člane euroobmočja.
For members of the euro area, this applies even more so.
Da bi od ekonomske in monetarne unije v Evropi kar največ pridobili, morajo te odgovornosti upoštevati vsi.
These responsibilities need to be respected by all, to benefit the most from economic and monetary union in Europe.
Politično delovanje mora biti v skladu z evropskimi zahtevami.
Policy actions need to be in line with European requirements.
Pri tem ne mislim samo upoštevanja davčnih predpisov znotraj Pakta za stabilnost in rast, ampak tudi vodenje takšnih strukturnih politik, zaradi katerih je Evropa bolj produktivna in zato bolj prilagodljiva.
By this, I do not only mean living up to the fiscal rules in the Stability and Growth Pact, but also conducting structural policies that make Europe more productive, and hence more flexible.
Podobno morajo zasebniki paziti na uravnovešenost med gibanjem stroškov in določanjem plač.
Likewise, private agents need to observe balanced behaviour in their cost and wage-setting behaviour.
Nezadostna napredek in poenotenje na teh področjih me ne skrbita samo kot navdušenega podpornika Evrope, ampak tudi kot oblikovalca monetarne politike, saj prav tako vplivata na okolje, v katerem deluje ECB.
Insufficient progress and convergence in these areas not only concerns me as an enthusiastic supporter of Europe, it also affects the environment in which the ECB operates, and therefore is also a concern to me as monetary policy-maker.
o kmetijstvu EU in podnebnih spremembah
on EU agriculture and climate change
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................21
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................17
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije "Prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam: izziv za evropsko kmetijstvo in podeželje"( SEC(2009)0417 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled ‘Adapting to climate change: the challenge for European agriculture and rural areas’ ( SEC(2009)0417 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije "Vloga evropskega kmetijstva pri ublažitvi podnebnih sprememb"( SEC(2009)1093 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled ‘The role of European agriculture in climate change mitigation’ ( SEC(2009)1093 ),
UL C 282E, 6.11.2008, str.
OJ C 282E, 6.11.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. marca 2008 o trajnostnem kmetijstvu in bioplinu: potreba po spremembi zakonodaje EU
– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2008 on sustainable agriculture and biogas: a need for review of EU legislation
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. februarja 2009 o 2050: prihodnost se začenja danes - priporočila za prihodnjo celovito politiko EU o podnebnih spremembah
– having regard to its resolution of 4 February 2009 entitled ‘2050: The future begins today – recommendations for the EU’s future integrated policy on climate change’
UL C 67 E, 18.3.2010, str.
OJ C 67 E, 18.3.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. marca 2009 o problematiki slabšanja stanja kmetijskih površin v EU in zlasti v južni Evropi: odziv prek instrumentov kmetijske politike EU
– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2009 on ‘the challenge of deterioration of agricultural land in the EU and in particular in southern Europe: the response through EU agricultural policy instruments’
Sprejeta besedila tega dne, P6_TA(2009)0130 . ,
Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2009)0130 . ,
Sprejeta besedila tega dne, P7_TA(2009)0089 . ,
Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2009)0089 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o mednarodni oceni agronomske znanosti in tehnologije za razvoj (IAASTD), ki sta ga pripravili Organizacija združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo ter Svetovna banka in ki ga je podpisalo 58 držav;
– having regard to the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology (IAASTD) report drawn up by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation and the World Bank and signed by 58 countries,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7‑0060/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7‑0060/2010 ),
A. ker so podnebne spremembe, ki so posledica dolgotrajnega kopičenja toplogrednih plinov v ozračju, znanstveno potrjeno dejstvo in imajo lahko hude posledice za ekosisteme,
A. whereas the climate change caused by the historical build-up of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere is a scientifically established fact that may have a serious impact on ecosystems,
B. ker kmetijstvo spada med gospodarske dejavnosti, ki upravljajo naravne vire v korist človeštva in ga te posledice neposredno zadevajo,
B. whereas agriculture is directly affected, since it is one of the many economic activities that manage natural resources for the benefit of humankind,
C. ker so podnebne spremembe ena najhujših groženj za okolje, pa tudi za družbeni in gospodarski red, produktivnost kmetijskih kultur pa se zaradi močne občutljivosti na skrajna vremenska nihanja iz leta v leto spreminja, kar posredno vpliva na vse gospodarske sektorje, med katerimi je kmetijstvo najbolj občutljivo,
C. whereas climate change poses one of the most serious threats not only to the environment, but to the economy and society as well, with crop yields fluctuating from one year to the next, heavily influenced by the variation in extreme climate conditions, which has an implicit impact on every sector of the economy, although agriculture remains the most vulnerable,
D. ker kmetijstvo prispeva k podnebnim odklonom, saj je eden glavnih virov dveh pomembnih toplogrednih plinov (dušikovega oksida in metana), ki se sproščata pri različnih bioloških procesih kmetijske pridelave, obenem pa je izpostavljeno usodnim posledicam teh odklonov,
D. whereas agriculture, as one of the main sources of two major GHGs (nitrous oxide and methane) which are generated by various biological processes linked to agricultural production is contributing to climate change while also being very vulnerable to its adverse impact,
E. ker so se emisije toplogrednih plinov iz kmetijstva (vključno z živinorejo) v obdobju 1990–2007 v EU-27 zmanjšale za 20 % in ker je v Uniji delež kmetijstva pri emisijah toplogrednih plinov padel z 11 % v letu 1990 na 9,3 % v letu 2007, zlasti zaradi povečane učinkovitosti EU kmetijstva, stalnih inovacij in uporabe novih tehnik, učinkovitejše uporabe gnojil in zadnjih reform SKP,
E. whereas GHG emissions from agriculture (including livestock farming) declined by 20% in the EU-27 between 1999 and 2007 and the proportion of the Union’s GHG emissions produced by agriculture dropped from 11% in 1990 to 9.3% in 2007, inter alia as a result of the increased efficiency of EU agriculture, constant innovations and the use of new techniques, the more effective use of fertilisers and the recent reforms of the CAP,
F. ker sta kmetijstvo in gozdarstvo glavna gospodarska sektorja, ki lahko zajemata CO 2 , ki nastaja zaradi človekovih dejavnosti, ter ga shranjujeta in skladiščita v zemlji zahvaljujoč se njuni sposobnosti zbiranja ter ga prek fotosinteze fiksirata v rastlinah; ker imata ta dva sektorja velike možnosti za pozitivno sodelovanje pri prizadevanjih za zmanjšanje segrevanja,
F. whereas agriculture and forestry are the main economic sectors able to capture the CO 2 produced by human activities, to accumulate and store it in the soil by acting as sinks, and to fix it in plants through photosynthesis; whereas these sectors consequently have considerable potential to make a positive contribution to global warming mitigation efforts,