natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
b) zagotavljanjem ustreznih pogojev za dojenje in dobro počutje novorojene živali v primeru, da samica skoti;
b) providing appropriate conditions for suckling and the welfare of the newborn animal in the case of a female having given birth;
c) zagotavljanjem vode za živali, ki prispejo v zabojnikih.
c) providing water in the case of animals delivered in containers.
Ker je prevoz živali pod temi pogoji v nasprotju z veljavnimi uredbami, tega ni treba vključiti v predlog o zakolu.
Since the transport of animals in these conditions contravenes the regulations in force, this aspect should not be included in a proposal concerning slaughter.
Priloga III – točka 1.7 – točka (c)
Annex III – point 1.7 – point c
c) dvigovati ali vleči živali za glavo, ušesa, rogove, noge, rep ali kožuh ali ravnati z njimi na način, ki bi jim lahko povzročil nepotrebne bolečine ali trpljenje;
c) lift or drag the animals by the head, ears, horns, legs, tail or fleece, or handle them in such a way as to cause them avoidable pain or suffering;
c) dvigovati ali vleči živali za glavo, ušesa, rogove, noge (razen nog perutnine ali lagomorfov) , rep ali kožuh ali ravnati z njimi na način, ki bi jim lahko povzročil nepotrebne bolečine ali trpljenje;
c) lift or drag the animals by the head, ears, horns, legs (with the exception of the feet of poultry and lagomorphs) , tail or fleece, or handle them in such a way as to cause them avoidable pain or suffering;
Perutnina in zajci se običajno ujamejo in držijo za noge.
Poultry and rabbits are usually caught by the legs and held by the feet.
Z obstoječo tehnologijo je skoraj nemogoče ujeti perutnino na drugi način.
It is practically not feasible to catch poultry in a different way under the existing technology.
Priloga III – točka 1.8 a (novo)
Annex III – Point 1.8 a (new)
Ta določba je v obstoječi direktivi (Priloga B, točka 4), a ni vključena v predlagano uredbo.
This provision is included in the current Directive (Annex B, point 4) but is excluded from the proposed Regulation.
Uporabna je pri preprečevanju zlorab električne opreme za omamljanje in bi zato morala biti vključena v uredbo.
It is helpful in preventing abuse of electrical stunning equipment and accordingly should be included in the Regulation.
Priloga III – točka 1.8 b (novo)
Annex III – Point 1.8 b (new)
1.8b Živali, ki ne morejo hoditi, se ne sme vleči na mesto zakola, ampak jih je treba ubiti na mestu, kjer se nahajajo.
Animals which are unable to walk must not be dragged to the place of slaughter, but must be slaughtered where they lie.
Vlečenje živali, ki ne morejo hoditi, na mesto zakola povzroča veliko trpljenje.
Substantial suffering is caused when animals that are unable to walk are dragged to the place of slaughter.
Usmrtiti bi jih bilo treba na mestu, kjer se nahajajo, ne da bi jih premikali.
They should be killed where they lie without being moved.
Podobna določba je v obstoječi direktivi, a je bila izključena iz predloga uredbe.
A similar provision is included in the current Directive but has been omitted from the proposed Regulation.
Priloga III – točka 2.1
Annex III – point 2,1
Vsaka žival ima dovolj prostora, da vstane, leže in se obrača.
Each animal shall have enough space to stand up, lie down and turn around.
Vsaka žival ima dovolj prostora, da vstane, leže in se obrača, razen velikega goveda, ki se za razumno kratek čas nahaja v individualnih boksih.
Except in the case of large bovine animals kept in individual pens for a period which does not exceed a reasonable limit, each animal shall have enough space to stand up, lie down and turn around.
Bivanje v boksih, kot to predvidevajo veljavne določbe, omogoča, da se govedo ne rani in je zaščiteno.
Keeping large bovine animals in pens in accordance with the rules currently in force makes it possible to ensure that they are not jostled and remain protected.
Če je omejeno na razumno kratek čas, ne ogroža dobrega počutja živali.
This is not detrimental to their welfare provided the period for which they are penned does not exceed reasonable limits.
Priloga III – točka 2 a (novo)
Annex III – Section 2 a (new)
(2a) Strelna naprava
Captive bolt stunning
Ustrelitev goveda v zatilje se prepove.
In particular, the shooting of cattle in the poll position shall be prohibited.
Ovce in koze se lahko ustrelijo v zatilje, če prisotnost rogov preprečuje temenski strel.
Sheep and goats may be shot in the poll position if the presence of horns prevents use of the crown position.
2.a2 Pri uporabi penetr ir nega klina mora operater preveriti, da se klin po vsakem strelu v celoti vrne v prvotni položaj.
When using a captive bolt instrument, the operator must check to ensure that the bolt retracts to its full extent after each shot.
Če se to ne zgodi, se klin ne sme več uporabljati, dokler ni popravljen.
If it does not so retract, the instrument must not be used again until it has been repaired.
Te določbe so v obstoječi direktivi, a so izključene iz predloga uredbe.
These provisions are in the current Directive but are excluded from the proposed Regulation.
Uporabne so pri zagotavljanju učinkovite uporabe strelne naprave in bi zato morale biti vključene v uredbo.
They are helpful in ensuring that captive bolt stunning is carried out effectively and accordingly should be included in the Regulation.
Priloga III – točka 2 b (novo)
Annex III – Point 2 b (new)
(2b) Omejitev premikanja živali
Restraint of animals
Žival se ne zapira v zaboj za omamljanje, prav tako se njena glava ne umešča v napravo, ki omejuje gibanje, razen če je oseba, ki bo žival omamila, pripravljena to storiti takoj, ko se žival zapre v zaboj za omamljanje ali ko se njena glava pritrdi.
An animal shall not be placed in a stunning box nor shall its head be placed in a device to restrict its movement unless the person who is to stun the animal is ready to do so as soon as the animal is placed in the stunning box or its head is fastened.
Priloga III – točka 3.1
Annex III – point 3,1
Kadar je ena sama oseba odgovorna za omamljanje, pritrjevanje na obešala, dvigovanje in izkrvavitev živali, mora navedena oseba zaporedoma opraviti vse navedene postopke na eni sami živali, preden katerega koli od teh postopkov opravi na drugi.
Where one person is responsible for the stunning, shackling, hoisting and bleeding of animals, that person must carry out all those operations consecutively on one animal before carrying out any of them on another animal.
Ta zahteva ne velja pri skupinskem omamljanju.
This requirement shall not apply when group stunning is used.
Ta zahteva ni praktična za obrate za skupinsko omamljanje ali relativno počasne obrate, kjer se omamljanje opravlja v enem koraku.
This requirement is not practical for plants with group stunning or relatively low speed plants where the stunning is performed in one step.
Postopek, ki omogoča najkrajši časovni razmik od omamljanja do zakola, je bistveno boljši.
The procedure which allows for the shortest stun-stick interval is significantly better.
Priloga III – točka 3.1 a (novo)
Annex III – Point 3.1 a (new)
3.1a Izkrvavitev se mora začeti takoj po omamlj e nju in se jo izpelje tako, da je hitra, obilna in popolna.
Bleeding must be started without delay after stunning and be carried out in such a way as to bring about rapid, profuse and complete bleeding.
Bistveno je, da se izkrvavitev izpelje takoj po omamljenju, da bi se zmanjšala nevarnost, da bi se živali pred smrtjo povrnila zavest.
It is essential that bleeding is performed without delay after stunning to reduce the danger of animals regaining consciousness before death.
Ta določba je v obstoječi direktivi, a je izključena iz predloga uredbe.
This provision is included in the current Directive but it has been excluded from the proposed Regulation.
Predlog spremembe ponovno vlaga to določbo.
The proposed amendment restores this provision.
Priloga III – točka 3.2 a (novo)
Annex III – Point 3.2 a (new)
3.2a Po rezu krvnih žil se na živalih ne smejo izvajati nikakršni nadaljnji obdelovalni postopki ali električna stimulacija, dokler se izkrvavitev ne zaključi, in nikakor pred potekom:
After incision of the blood vessels, no further dressing procedures nor any electrical stimulation may be performed on the animals before the bleeding has ended and, in any event, not before the expiry of—
a) najmanj 120 sekund pri puranu ali gosi;
a) in the case of a turkey or goose, a period of not less than 120 seconds;
b) najmanj 90 sekund pri kateri koli drugi ptici;
b) in the case of any other bird, a period of not less than 90 seconds;
c) najmanj 30 sekund pri omamljenem govedu;
c) in the case of stunned bovine animals, a period of not less than 30 seconds;
d) najmanj 120 sekund pri govedu, ki ni bilo omamljeno;
d) in the case of bovine animals that have not been stunned, a period of not less than 120 seconds;
e) najmanj 20 sekund pri ovcah, kozah, prašičih in srnjadi.
e) in the case of sheep, goats, pigs and deer, a period of not less than 20 seconds.
Bistveno je, da se pripravljalni postopki in električna simulacija ne opravljajo na živalih, dokler so žive.
It is important that dressing procedures and electrical stimulation are not performed on animals until they are dead.
Takšna določba je v obstoječi direktivi, a je izključena iz predloga uredbe.
The current Directive includes such a provision but it has been excluded from the proposed Regulation.
Večina podrobnih podatkov temelji na zakonodaji Velike Britanije.
Most of the detailed figures are based on UK legislation.
Priloga III – točka 3.3
Annex III – point 3.3
Ptice se ne zakoljejo z avtomatskimi noži za rezanje vratu, razen če se lahko ugotovi, ali ti noži pravilno prerežejo krvne žile ali ne.
Birds shall not be slaughtered by means of automatic neck cutters unless it can be ascertained whether or not the neck cutters have effectively severed the blood vessels.
Kadar avtomatski noži ne režejo pravilno, se ptica takoj usmrti .
When neck cutters have not been effective the bird shall be killed immediately.
Kadar avtomatski noži ne režejo pravilno, se ptica takoj zakolje .
When neck cutters have not been effective the bird shall be slaughtered immediately.
Te živali bodo še vedno namenjene za prehrano ljudi.
The animals will still be intended for human consumption.
Priloga IV – točka (f a) (novo)
Annex IV – point (f a) (new)
(fa) zakol kožuharjev
f a.) the killing of fur animals
Praktični vidiki ravnanja z živalmi in omejitve premikanja.
Practical aspects of handling and restraining animals.
Praktični vidiki tehnik omamljanja.
Practical aspects of stunning techniques.
Rezervne metode omamljanja in/ali zakola.
Back-up stunning and/or slaughter methods.
Vzdrževanje opreme za omamljanje in/ali zakola.
Maintenance of stunning and/or slaughter equipment.
Spremljanje učinkovitosti omamljanja.
Monitoring the effectiveness of stunning.
Pomembno je, da se opredelijo dejavnosti, pri katerih je nujna usposobljenost izvajalcev zakola živali na kmetijah, na katerih se pridobiva krzno.
It is important to specify the operations in which those involved in killing animals on fur farms must be competent.
Obvladovanje nalezljivih bolezni prav tako lahko zahteva zakol na milijone živali.
The control of contagious diseases may also require the killing of millions of animals.
Ravnanje z velikim številom živali tem povzroča nepotrebno trpljenje, ne zgolj med rejo in prevozom, ampak tudi v času zakola ali usmrtitve ter z njimi povezanimi dejavnostmi.
Many farm animals are subject to treatment which involves unnecessary suffering, not only during their rearing and transport, but also at the time of slaughter or killing and related operations.
Skrb za izboljšanje dobrega počutja živali v evropski družbi se izboljšuje tako med potrošniki kot med proizvajalci.
There are growing concerns for improving animal welfare in European society among consumers and producers.
Direktiva 92/119/ES ureja zaščito dobrega počutja živali v času zakola ali usmrtitve ter med z njimi povezanimi postopki.
Animal welfare protection at the time of slaughter or killing or during related processes is governed by Directive 92/119/EC.
Poleg tega je bila leta 2004 sprejeta nova zakonodaja, poimenovana "higienski sveženj", ki je klavnicam naložila odgovornost za kakovost živil.
In addition, new legislation was adopted in 2004 with the 'hygiene package', which made operators responsible for the quality of foodstuffs.
Direktiva 93/119/ES ni bila spremenjena, odkar je začela veljati, čeprav je v tem času prišlo do tehnološkega napredka pri načinih omamljanja, zakola in usmrtitve živali.
Since it came into force, Directive 93/119/EC has not been amended, although in the meantime there have been technological advances in methods of stunning, slaughter and killing of animals.
Cilj in področje uporabe predloga Komisije
Aim and scope of the Commission proposal
Glavni cilj predloga Komisije je izboljšanje dobrega počutja živali med usmrtitvijo na kmetijah za živali za potrošniške namene, kožuharje ter živali, usmrčenih v primeru izbruha nalezljive bolezni, drugih groženj javnemu zdravju ali zaradi okoljskih razlogov.
The main aim of the Commission proposal is to improve animal welfare during the killing of farm animals intended for consumption, fur animals, and animals slaughtered in the event of the outbreak of contagious diseases, other threats to public health, or on environmental grounds.
Predlog Komisije tudi spodbuja inovacije pri načinih omamljanja, zakola in usmrtitve ter večjo usklajenost na notranjem trgu.
The Commission proposal also seeks to promote innovation in methods of stunning, slaughter and killing and to improve harmonisation in the internal market.
Med glavnimi spremembami predložene zakonodaje je prehod z zakonodajnega temelja direktive na uredbo, kar bo izboljšalo poenotenje zakonodaj držav članic, krepitev konkurenčnosti na notranjem trgu in pospeševanje sprejemanja novih načinov omamljanja, zakola in usmrtitve.
One of the main changes in the proposed legislation is the switch from a directive to a regulation as the legal basis, allowing for improved harmonisation of the Member States' laws, enhancing competition in the internal market and speeding up the adoption of new methods of stunning, slaughter and killing.
Po novi zakonodaji so nosilci dejavnosti odgovorni za dobro počutje živali, hkrati pa se jim omogoča velika prožnost pri izvajanju novih standardov na tem področju.
The new legislation makes operators responsible for animal welfare, at the same time giving them greater flexibility in implementing new standards in this area.
Klavnice morajo razviti in izvajati standardne operativne postopke, imenovati pristojno osebo za dobro počutje živali, zagotoviti, da so delavci, ki izvajajo omamljanje, zakol in usmrtitev, ustrezno usposobljeni, saj jih morajo izobraziti, jim izdati spričevala o usposobljenosti ter opravljati preverjanje in spremljanje učinkovitosti postopkov omamljanja.
Operators are required to develop and implement standard operating procedures, appoint an animal welfare officer, ensure that workers responsible for killing and related operations are properly qualified by requiring them to undergo training and obtain certificates of competence, and carry out checks and monitoring of the effectiveness of stunning processes.
Za majhne klavnice je dodana določba z oprostitvami.
Provision is made for derogations for small operators.
Predlog vsebuje določbo, ki predvideva nadzor klavnic in izdajanje dovoljenj s strani pristojnega organa države članice.
The proposal makes provision for the operators' activities to be monitored and authorised by the competent authorities of the Member States.
Predlog predvideva tudi vzpostavitev nacionalnih referenčnih centrov, ki bodo ponujali znanstveno in tehnično strokovno podporo za dobro počutje živali, izvajali ocenjevanje novih načinov omamljanja in ponujali podporo pri izvajanju uredbe.
The proposal provides for the setting up of national reference centres to provide scientific and technical expertise relating to animal welfare, carry out assessments of new stunning methods and provide support for the implementation of the regulation.
V predlogu je tudi seznam načinov omamljanja in usmrtitve živali ter podrobne informacije o specifikacijah in zahtevah.
The proposal includes a list of methods for the stunning and killing of animals, together with detailed information regarding specifications and requirements.
Nova zasnova zaščite dobrega počutja živali v času zakola predvideva osnovno načelo, da morajo biti živali pri zakolu omamljene.
The new concept of animal welfare protection at time of slaughter incorporates the basic principle that animals should be stunned when they are killed.
V predlogu je predvideno, da morajo proizvajalci opreme za omejevanje gibanja in omamljanje živali poskrbeti za navodila za uporabo in vzdrževanje te opreme, da bi se zagotovili kar najboljši pogoji za dobro počutje živali med njeno uporabo.
The proposal requires producers of equipment for the restraining and stunning of animals to provide instructions for the use and maintenance of such equipment in order to ensure optimum animal welfare conditions during its use.
Upoštevajoč temeljne pravice državljanov predlog Komisije predvideva izjeme za primere, v katerih je zakol živali opravljen v skladu z verskim obredom.
Bearing in mind the basic rights of citizens, the Commission proposal provides for derogations for cases in which animals are slaughtered in accordance with religious rites.
Poročevalec pozdravlja predlog Komisije in izraža zadovoljstvo, ker se Komisija uspešno sooča z izzivom izboljšanja standardov za dobro počutje živali v času zakola in usmrtitve ter med z njima povezanimi postopki.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal and is pleased that it is meeting the challenge of raising animal welfare standards at the time of slaughter or killing and during related processes.
Predlog je skladen s cilji in načeli akcijskega načrta Skupnosti o protokolu o zaščiti in dobrem počutju živali ter strategiji za zdravje živali.
The proposal is consistent with the aims and principles of the Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals and the Animal Health Strategy.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba množičen zakol živali izvajati ob upoštevanju čim višjih meril humanosti, kar se da omejiti fizično in duševno trpljenje živali ter odpraviti nepotrebno krutost.
The rapporteur believes that the large-scale slaughter of animals should be carried out with due regard for the highest possible humanitarian standards, limiting as far as possible the physical and mental suffering experienced by animals and seeking to eliminate unnecessary cruelty.
Zmanjšanje trpljenja živali za zakol bi lahko predstavljalo pomemben kulturni in moralni izziv evropski civilizaciji, saj se zavedamo, da so živali čuteča bitja, ki občutijo bolečino in strah, zato jih ne smemo obravnavati kot predmete.
Limiting the suffering of animals for slaughter should be seen as an important cultural and moral challenge to European civilisation, bearing in mind the principle that animals are sentient beings capable of feeling pain and fear and cannot be treated as objects.
V civilizirani evropski kulturi ne moremo ostati neprizadeti ob trpljenju živali.
In a civilised European culture we cannot remain indifferent to the suffering of animals.
Sprejetje uredbe, s katero se poskuša zmanjšati trpljenje živali za zakol, bi bila dobrodošla pobuda.
The introduction of a regulation seeking to reduce the suffering of slaughtered animals is a welcome initiative.
Obstoječe določbe EU iz leta 1993 so v obliki direktive in so neprimerne, saj ne zagotavljajo poenotenega pristopa Evropske unije in posameznih držav članic.
The existing EU provisions from 1993 are in the form of a directive and are inadequate since they fail to ensure a uniform approach throughout the European Union and in individual Member States.
Predlog, da se jih zamenja z novo neposredno izvedljivo uredbo, je povsem upravičen.
The proposal to replace them by a new and directly applicable regulation is fully justified.
Uredba zadeva zaščito pri zakolu in usmrtitvi za živali, ki so bile vzrejene za proizvodnjo živil, volne, kože, krzna ali drugih proizvodov.
The regulation concerns protection at the time of killing or slaughter of farm animals for the production of food, wool, skin, fur or other products.
Ne pokriva usmrtitve živali v primeru lova, kulturnih ali športnih dejavnosti, veterinarskih posegov znotraj njihove zdravniške prakse, ali perutnine in lagomorfov, ki jih njihovi lastniki usmrtijo izven klavnic, za lastne potrebe.
It does not cover the killing of animals performed as part of hunting, cultural or sporting activities, performed by veterinarians in the framework of their medical practice, or the killing of poultry and lagomorphs slaughtered outside of a slaughterhouse by their owner for his or her personal consumption.
Obstoj teh izjem je opravičljiv, vendar je treba pripraviti posebno direktivo za usmrtitev živali, ki se ne redijo na kmetijah v gospodarske namene.
While the justification for such exemptions can be recognised, there is a need for separate regulation by means of a directive for the killing of animals other than farm animals for economic purposes.
Tak predpis bi pokrival tudi usmrtitev laboratorijskih in drugih živali iz zgoraj omenjenih kategorij, kot tudi domačih in potepuških živali.
Such regulation should also cover the killing of animals used for experiments and others mentioned above, as well as domestic and stray animals.
Pri usmrtitvi teh živali je treba kar se da upoštevati potrebo, da se trpljenje živali zmanjša.
The killing of such animals should take account as far as possible of the need to minimise suffering.
Poročevalec poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi ustrezno direktivo na tem področju.
The rapporteur calls on the Commission to draw up an appropriate directive in this area.
Poročevalec v celoti podpira vzpostavitev splošnega načela, da je treba živalim prihraniti nepotrebno bolečino, stisko ali trpljenje v času usmrtitve in ob sorodnih dejavnostih.
The rapporteur fully supports the establishment of a general rule that animals should be spared all unnecessary pain, anxiety or suffering at the time of killing and related operations.
Poziva, naj se sprejmejo ukrepi za zagotovitev upoštevanja tega načela.
He urges that the measures be taken that will ensure compliance with this rule.
Poročevalec meni, da je prav, da se opredeli, da morajo metode za zakol imeti za rezultat takojšnjo smrt ali omamljenost živali.
The rapporteur believes that it is right to stipulate that methods of killing must result in the immediate death or stunning of the animals concerned.
Poročevalec priznava, da obredni zakol predstavlja problem, saj zaradi verskih razlogov živali ne smejo biti omamljene pred usmrtitvijo.
The rapporteur recognises the problem posed by ritual slaughter, which for religious reasons does not allow animals to be rendered unconscious before killing.
Primerna rešitev bi bila, da se prepusti nacionalnim zakonodajalcem, da presodijo o nedopustnosti obrednega zakola.
An appropriate solution would be to leave it to the national legislators to rule on the inadmissibility of ritual slaughter.
Hkrati je treba vzpostaviti dialog z verskimi skupnostmi, ki izvajajo obredne zakole, da bi se sprejeli ukrepi, s katerimi bi se trpljenje tako usmrčenih živalih kar se da zmanjšalo.
At the same time, there is a need for dialogue with religious communities practising ritual slaughter with a view to taking possible measures to reduce the suffering of animals killed in this way.
Poudariti je treba, da meso obredno zaklanih živali pogosto pride do potrošnikov, ki niso člani skupnosti, ki opravljajo tovrstne usmrtitve.
It should be pointed out that meat from animals killed by ritual slaughter to a large extent finds its way to consumers who do not belong to the communities which practise this kind of killing.