natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
88. poudarja, da bo morala EU po letu 2020 okrepiti svoja prizadevanja in da bi zato lahko bilo smiselno oblikovati vmesni cilj, na primer za leto 2030; poziva Komisijo, naj razvije konkretne instrumente za stroškovno kar se da učinkovito doseganje teh ciljev;
Points out that the EU needs to step up its efforts from 2020 onwards and that in this respect it could make sense to identify an intermediate target for 2030, for example; calls on the Commission to develop specific instruments to achieve these goals in the most cost-effective way;
Skupne koristi in učinki
Co-benefits and impacts
94. opaža, da ni na voljo temeljite ocene učinka, ki bi ga prehod na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo imel za zaposlovanje, ki bi zajemal predvsem selitev delovnih mest med panogami, ter da je treba ugotoviti, kdo bi pri takem prehodu pridobil in kdo izgubil;
Notes the lack of a thorough assessment of the impacts on employment caused by the low carbon transition which would primarily entail a shift of jobs across sectors, and that there is a need to identify better the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ of such a transition;
97. opozarja na dejstvo, da je poleg razvoja novih podnebnih tehnologij odločilnega pomena njihovo razširjanje; poziva Komisijo, naj ukrepa tudi na tem področju, na primer z vzpostavitvijo novih možnosti financiranja;
Draws attention to the fact that, in addition to developing new climate technologies, disseminating them is decisive; calls on the Commission to take action in this field too, for example by creating new financing arrangements;
99. ugotavlja, da bi glede na oceno Komisije določitev višjega cilja za zmanjšanje povzročila upad uvoza nafte in plina v višini do 40 milijard EUR do leta 2020 ob predpostavki, da bo cena sodčka nafte leta 2020 znašala 88 USD; pozdravlja dejstvo, da bi bilo odvisnost EU od uvoza energije s tem mogoče zmanjšati za skoraj 56 %; meni, da je ta ocena cene nafte verjetno zelo konzervativna, saj Mednarodna agencija za energijo za leto 2020 napoveduje ceno 108 USD za sodček;
Notes that, according to the Commission’s assessment, setting a higher reduction target would lead to a reduction in oil and gas imports of up to EUR 40 billion by 2020 at an assumed oil price of USD 88 per barrel in 2020; welcomes the fact that the EU’s dependence on energy imports could thus be reduced by up to 56%; considers that this oil price estimate is likely to be very conservative, as the International Energy Agency (2010) predicts an oil price of USD 108 by 2020;
105. je zaskrbljen, ker se inovacije na področju trajnostnih tehnologij iz Evrope že selijo v druge dele sveta, kar Evropo lahko spremeni v neto uvoznico teh tehnologij in povezanih končnih izdelkov; ugotavlja, da ima na podlagi nedavnih raziskav od 50 podjetij, ki so bila opredeljena kot vodilna na področju čiste tehnologije, 24 podjetij svoj sedež v Aziji, 22 v Združenih državah, tri v Evropi in eno v Kanadi; poudarja, da so po podatkih barometra družbe Ernst & Young iz leta 2010 Kitajska in Združene države najprivlačnejše regije na svetu za razvoj obnovljivih virov energije;
Is concerned that a shift in sustainable technology innovation away from Europe to other parts of the world is already occurring, which may turn Europe into a net importer of these technologies and related finished products; states that, according to recent surveys, out of the 50 companies identified as clean technology leaders, 24 were based in Asia, 22 in the United States, three in Europe, and one in Canada; stresses that, according to the Ernst &Young 2010 barometer, China and the US are the most attractive regions of the world for the development of renewable energy sources;·
Načrt do leta 2050, str.
Roadmap 2050, p.
Ocenjevanje tveganja selitve virov CO 2 iz EU
Assessing the risk of carbon leakage
9 najboljša zaščita pred tveganjem selitve industrijskih virov toplogrednih plinov izven EU in da moramo pozorno spremljati dogajanje z namenom, da bi v EU ohranili močne industrijske temelje
9 and that there is a need to remain vigilant in order to maintain a strong industrial base in Europe
120. poudarja, da ne obstaja enotna rešitev za vse gospodarske sektorje, občutljive na selitev virov CO 2 , ter da sta narava proizvoda ali struktura trga bistveni merili za izbiro razpoložljivih sredstev (brezplačna dodelitev kvot, državna pomoč ali poravnave na mejah);
Emphasises that there is no single solution for industrial sectors that are vulnerable to carbon leakage, and that the nature of the product or the structure of the market are essential criteria for choosing between the tools available (free allocation of allowances, State aid or border adjustment measures);
Nadaljnje priložnosti in izzivi
Further opportunities and challenges
128. poziva Komisijo naj po eni strani podpre ukrepe za izpolnitev zahtev trga dela, ki so posledica prehoda v nizkoogljično gospodarstvo, po drugi pa ukrepe za prestrukturiranje za delavce, ki so na voljo v novih sektorjih;
Calls on the Commission to support, on the one hand, measures to meet labour market requirements arising from the change to a low-carbon economy and, on the other, restructuring measures covering workers who become available in the new sectors;
131. v zvezi s tem opozarja na sporočilo Komisije o strategiji EU 2020, ki poziva k prenosu davčnega bremena od dela na energijo; pozdravlja napoved v letnem pregledu rasti, da se bo predlagala prilagoditev evropskega okvira za obdavčitev energije v skladu s cilji EU na področju energije in podnebja;
Recalls, in this context, the Commission’s Communication on the EU2020 strategy calling for a shift in the tax burden from labour to energy; welcomes the announcement in the annual growth survey of a proposal to adapt the European framework for energy taxation in line with the EU energy and climate objectives;
133. poudarja, da mora Evropska unija ohraniti in celo okrepiti potrebni pritisk na tretje države, da dosežejo svoj delež pri globalnem zmanjšanju toplogrednih plinov v prihodnosti; ugotavlja, da bo višja ciljna vrednost zmanjšanja toplogrednih plinov znotraj EU še okrepila položaj in pogajalsko moč EU v pogajanjih v okviru UNFCCC ter spodbudila razprave o mednarodnem sporazumu o podnebnih spremembah; poudarja, da je EU ob številnih preteklih priložnostih uspelo s prevzemanjem vodilne vloge pri uvajanju zakonodaje prepričati ostale države k dvigu njihovih okoljskih zahtev; izpostavlja, da so ukrepi EU v teh primerih dokazali, da je mogoče združiti visoke okoljske zahteve in gospodarsko rast;
133.Emphasises that the European Union must maintain and even reinforce the necessary pressure on third countries to deliver their share of global greenhouse gas reductions in the future; notes that a higher GHG reduction target within the EU will strengthen even further the EU’s position and bargaining power in the UNFCCC negotiations and stimulate the discussions on an international climate change agreement; emphasises that the EU has, on many previous occasions, managed to get other countries to raise their environmental requirements by taking the lead in introducing legislation; points out that EU action in these cases has shown that it is possible to combine high environmental requirements with economic growth;
· oceni učinke domače politike za zmanjšanje emisij na zaposlovanje, vključno z zaposlitvenimi možnostmi, in spodbuja izboljšanje vedenja o nizkih emisijah CO 2 , prekvalificiranje k energijskem sektorju ter potrebe po izpopolnjevanju znanj, izobrazbe in usposabljanja, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja;
· assess the effects of domestic emissions-reduction policies on employment, including job opportunities, and promote the improvement of low-carbon literacy, energy-related reskilling and upskilling needs and education and training, in particular for SMEs,
· analizira, v kolikšni meri države članice izpolnjujejo svojo zavezo, da bodo vsaj 50 % prihodkov od dražbe porabile za ukrepe blažitve in prilagajanja, ter naj po potrebi predlaga ukrepe;
· analyse to what extent Member States meet their commitment to spend at least 50% of the auction revenues on mitigation and adaptation measures, and propose measures, if necessary,
· analizira učinek povečanih ciljev EU glede zmanjšanja emisij na ravni držav članic, kot je navedeno v sklepih Okoljskega sveta z dne 14. marca 2011;
· analyse the impact of the EU’s increased emissions reduction targets at Member State level, as indicated in the Environment Council Conclusions of 14 March 2011,
· pripravi ustrezno financiranje za strateški načrt za energetsko tehnologijo;
· provide proper financing for the SET-Plan,
· spodbuja učinkovito uporabo kohezijskega in strukturnih skladov v državah članicah, zlasti za ukrepe energetske učinkovitosti, hkrati pa opozarja, da morajo taka sredstva v prvi vrsti služiti namenu zmanjševanja ekonomskih in socialnih razlik v EU;
· promote the efficient use of the Structural and Cohesion Funds by the Member States, in particular for energy-efficiency measures, whilst taking full account of the principle that such investments must be regional and reduce economic and social disparities within the EU,
· uvede inovativne finančne mehanizme financiranja (npr. obnavljajoče sheme);
· introduce innovative financing mechanisms (such as revolving schemes),
· nameni dodatna sredstva za šibkejše in prikrajšane regije za ukrepe v sektorjih, ki niso zajeti v sistemu trgovanja z emisijami (gradbeništvo, prevoz, kmetijstvo);
· earmark additional funds for weaker and disadvantaged regions to cover measures in non-ETS sectors (buildings, transport, agriculture),
· v osmem okvirnem raziskovalnem programu nameni prednost raziskavam na področju podnebja in energije, tudi energetske učinkovitosti, in raziskavam vzrokov za podnebne spremembe ter načinov, da se jim prilagodimo;
· give priority to climate and energy research under the Eighth Research Framework Programme, including energy efficiency, and to research into the causes of climate change and adaptation to it,
· preuči, kakšen učinek bi lahko imela enostranska poteza EU, da bi presegla 20-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, za pripravljenost drugih držav, da se pridružijo mednarodnemu sporazumu;
· analyse what impact a unilateral move by the EU beyond 20% greenhouse gas emissions reductions could have on other countries’ willingness to join an international agreement,
· preuči možne negativne posledice v zvezi s selitvijo okolju prijaznih delovnih mest ter zmanjšanjem naložb in konkurenčnosti v okolju prijaznih sektorjih.
· investigate the potential impact in terms of green jobs’ leakage and reduced investments and competitiveness in green sectors;
Grožnja, ki jo za človeštvo predstavljajo podnebne spremembe, se ne zmanjšuje in učinki segrevanja za 2 °C so hujši, kot je bilo predvideno.
The threat to humanity posed by climate change is not decreasing, and the impacts of 2°C warming are rather worse than previously thought.
Čeprav ekstremnih vremenskih dogodkov ni mogoče pripisati globalnemu segrevanju, pa je zelo verjetno, da podnebne spremembe povečujejo pogostost in intenzivnost skrajnosti.
Although it is not possible to pin extreme weather events to global warming, it is very likely that climate change exacerbates the frequency and intensity of the extremes.
To, da mednarodni skupnosti v Københavnu ni uspelo doseči celostne zavezujoče mednarodne pogodbe o podnebju, ne pomeni, da države ne sprejemajo ukrepov.
The inability of the international community to come to a comprehensive binding international climate treaty in Copenhagen does not mean countries are not taking action.
Rezultati srečanja v Cancunu dokazujejo, da države sprejemajo ukrepe, in pogajanja so dobila nov zagon.
Results from Cancun meeting prove that countries are taking action and negotiations have gained new momentum.
Emisije ogljika v Evropi so sedaj za 17,3 % nižje kot leta 1990.
Europe is now 17.3% below 1990 carbon emissions.
Evropska agencija za okolje, oktober 2010 Evropska agencija za okolje pričakuje, da se bodo emisije kljub okrevanju gospodarstva brez nadaljnjih ukrepov ustalile pod ravnjo iz leta 2008
EEA, October 2010 The European Environmental Agency anticipates emissions to stabilise below 2008 levels, even with economic recovery, and without further measures.
Učinkovitost sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami
EU ETS effectiveness
Brez znatne znižanja zgornje omejitve emisij je sistem trgovanja z emisijami v nevarnosti, da bo z vidika spodbujanje vlaganj v zelene tehnologije in inovacije postal odveč.
Without significant tightening of the cap, the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) risks becoming redundant in driving investments in green technologies and innovation.
34. je pokazala, da bo v okviru ciljnega 20-odstotnega zmanjšanja presežek pravic iz sistema trgovanja z emisijami leta 2020 znašal okrog 2,4 milijarde prenesenih pravic in neuporabljenih mednarodnih dobropisov.
34 has shown that under the 20% climate target, the surplus of allowances in the ETS will correspond to around 2.4 billion banked allowances and unused international credits in 2020.
Ta presežek vodi k neučinkovitemu cenovnemu signalu in bo tudi znatno zmanjšal prihodke iz dražb, ki bi jih lahko uporabili za spodbujanje nizkoogljičnih tehnologij in vlaganj v varčevanje z energijo, kar bi ustvarilo milijone novih delovnih mest.
This surplus leads to an inefficient price signal and will also significantly reduce revenues from auctioning that could be used to stimulate climate technologies and investments in energy savings, thereby creating millions of additional jobs.
Predlog poročevalca
The Rapporteur´s proposal
V luči navedenega poročevalec poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej, najkasneje pa do konca leta 2011, pripravi predloge za povečanje evropskih podnebnih ambicij na 30-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov do leta 2020.
In this light, your Rapporteur calls for the Commission to come forward with proposals to increase Europe's climate ambition to a 30% greenhouse gas reduction for 2020 as soon as possible, and at least before the end of 2011.
Predlagani pristop je po mnenju poročevalca dokaj skromen.
The approach suggested is rather moderate in the Rapporteur’s view.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bil s stališča znanosti in cilja ohranjanja podnebnih sprememb v okviru 2 °C, kaj šele 1,5 °C, kar je tudi cilj, ki ga priznava UNFCCC, bolj ustrezen prehod na 40-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov.
Your Rapporteur considers that a move to 40% greenhouse gas reduction would be more appropriate from the point of view of science and the objective of maintaining climate change to 2°C, let alone 1.5°C, an objective also recognised under the UNFCCC.
Poročevalec tudi ne poziva k temu, da bi podnebni cilj EU v celoti dosegli z domačim zmanjšanjem, čeprav bi to povečalo koristi za evropske državljane prek izboljšane kakovosti zraka v Evropi in pritegnilo vlaganja v gospodarstvo EU.
Your Rapporteur has also refrained from calling for full domestic achievement of the EU climate target, although this would increase benefits for European citizens through improved European air quality and drive investments into the EU economy.
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko (*)
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( *)
o analizi možnosti, da se preseže ciljno 20-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, ter o oceni tveganja selitve industrijskih virov toplogrednih plinov izven EU
on analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage
A. ker se bodo po scenarijih Mednarodne agencije za energijo do leta 2035 z energijo povezane svetovne emisije ogljika verjetno povečale za 21 % glede na raven iz leta 2008, če bodo države skrbno izpolnile svoje obveznosti iz københavnskega sporazuma, kar bi onemogočilo omejitev globalnega segrevanja na 2 °C; ker velja, da so države, ki niso članice OECD, odgovorne za celotno pričakovano povečanje svetovnih emisij
A. whereas according to International Energy Agency (IEA) scenarios global energy-related carbon emissions are likely to increase by 21% over 2008 levels by 2035 if countries implement their commitments made in the Copenhagen Accord in a cautious manner, which would then make it impossible to limit further global warming to 2°C; whereas non-OECD countries are deemed to account for all of the projected increase in world emissions
Poročilo Mednarodne agencije za energijo z dne 9. novembra 2010 z naslovom „World Energy Outlook 2010“ ,
Report of the International Energy Agency (IEA) of 9 November 2010, entitled ‘World Energy Outlook 2010’. ,
B. ker je po podatkih Mednarodne agencije za energijo delež EU v svetovnih emisijah CO 2 le 13 %,
B. whereas according to IEA figures the EU accounts for only 13% of global CO 2 emissions,
C. ker bi glede na direktivo o sistemu trgovanja z emisijami ta sistem moral spodbujati stroškovno in ekonomsko učinkovito zmanjševanje emisij toplogrednih plinov,
C. whereas in accordance with the ETS directive the ETS scheme should promote reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and economically efficient manner;
Analiza cilja zmanjšanja emisij za 20 % danes
Analysis of the 20% target today
3. ugotavlja, da po informacijah iz različnih industrijskih panog obstajajo jasni znaki, da obstoječi ukrepi podnebne politike EU, kot je sistem trgovanja z emisijami, že vodijo v selitev proizvodnje, in je zaskrbljen, da bodo višje cene ogljika ta trend še poslabšale;
Notes that according to the information received from various industrial sectors there are clear indications that existing EU climate policy provisions, such as the ETS, are already leading to a relocation of production, and is concerned that higher carbon prices would exacerbate this trend;
8. poziva EU, naj okrepi svoja prizadevanja za povečanje deleža obnovljivih virov energije v proizvodnji električne energije in naj ustvari pogoje za pametna omrežja, da bi se zagotovila vse bolj decentralizirana proizvodnja energije; poudarja, da je za dosego tega treba več vlagati v projekte energetske infrastrukture;
Calls on the EU to make greater efforts to increase the share of renewable energies in the electricity sector and to create the conditions for intelligent networks, in order to guarantee increasingly decentralised energy production; stresses that, if this is to be achieved, more must be invested in energy infrastructure projects;
17. obžaluje, da nekatere države zunaj EU, ki subvencionirajo cene energije in nimajo omejitev ali kvot za emisije CO 2 , pridobivajo primerjalno konkurenčno prednost; poudarja, da bi lahko bile te države manj pripravljene pridružiti se večstranskemu svetovnemu sporazumu o boju proti globalnemu segrevanju, saj njihove emisije CO 2 niso omejene in so zato cenejše;
Deplores the fact that, by subsidising energy prices and applying no restrictions or quotas on CO 2 emissions, certain countries outside the EU are gaining comparative competitive advantages; stresses that, because their CO 2 emissions are unrestricted and thus cheaper, these countries might be less willing to join a multilateral global agreement to fight global warming;
18. poziva k uporabi splošnega načela, da bi EU morala slediti stroškovno najučinkovitejšemu pristopu za zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 , hkrati pa zagotoviti, da bodo obetavne inovativne tehnologije in naložbe, skladne z dolgoročnimi podnebnimi cilji EU, deležne podpore za pravočasno uvedbo na trg; meni, da je treba pri izvajanju tega načela upoštevati načelo subsidiarnosti;
Calls for the application of a general principle that the EU should follow the most cost-effective pathway to reduce CO 2 emissions while supporting the timely deployment of promising innovative technologies and investments which are in line with the EU’s long-term climate target; believes that the subsidiarity principle has to be respected in the implementation of that principle;
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0485 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0485 . ;
24. poudarja, da je po navedbah Komisije skoraj 8 milijard EUR sredstev EU za energetsko učinkovitost neizkoriščenih; zato pozdravlja namero Komisije, da bo olajšala in spodbujala uporabo strukturnih skladov za projekte energetske prenove stavb; pričakuje konkretne pobude, tudi kar zadeva določbe o financiranju;
Points out that according to the Commission nearly €8 billion in EU energy-efficiency funding remains unclaimed; welcomes, therefore, the Commission's intention to facilitate and promote the use of the Structural Funds for energy-related building refurbishment projects; awaits concrete initiatives, including as regards the funding provisions;
28. meni, da bi vključevanje sektorskih pristopov v sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami povečalo splošno gospodarsko učinkovitost vseh sodelujočih držav; poudarja, da je vredno razmisliti o prednostih širitve sektorskih pristopov še na druge sektorje in države;
Considers that integrating sectoral approaches into the EU ETS would increase overall economic efficiency in all participating countries; stresses that it is worth considering the benefits of extending sectoral approaches to cover further sectors and countries;
31. opozarja na prispevek jedrske energije k zmanjševanju emisij CO 2 , saj bi zaprtje jedrskih elektrarn v EU povzročilo 50-odstotno povečanje emisij;
Notes the contribution made by nuclear energy to reducing CO 2 emissions, since closing nuclear power plants operating in the EU would lead to a 50% increase in emissions;
34. poudarja potencial kmetijstva, da pomembno prispeva k preprečevanju podnebnih sprememb, in zlasti potencial uporabe kmetijskih odpadkov pri proizvodnji trajnostne energije, kar pomeni nov vir dohodka za kmete; meni, da bi prihodnja skupna kmetijska politika morala biti orodje, ki bi državam članicam pomagalo doseči cilje na področju podnebnih sprememb, in da bi morala kmetom pomagati pri izkoriščanju prednosti okolju prijazne rasti; meni, da mora biti zeleni element skupne kmetijske politike del ureditve neposrednih plačil v prvem stebru, da bi preprečili zapletene upravne postopke ter zagotovili spodbude za okoljske zaveze kmetov in enotno izvajanje v vseh državah članicah;
Highlights the potential for agriculture to make a major contribution to tackling climate change and, in particular, the potential for using agricultural waste in the production of sustainable energy, thereby creating an additional revenue stream for farmers; believes that the future CAP should be a tool to help Member States reach environmental and climate-change targets and that it should help farmers exploit the benefits offered by green growth; believes that the greening component of the CAP must be a part of the direct payment arrangements under the first pillar, in order to avoid complicated administrative procedures, ensure that farmers' environmental commitments are incentivised and secure uniform implementation across Member States;
37. meni, da bi bili lahko sektorski pristopi z ublažitvijo prehoda na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo in odpiranjem poti globalnemu trgu z ogljikom, v povezavi z omejitvami za vse gospodarstvo v industrializiranih državah, tudi del mednarodnega okvira za podnebne ukrepe po letu 2012;
Considers that by smoothing the transition towards a low-carbon economy and paving the way for a global carbon market, sectoral approaches, combined with economy-wide caps in industrialised countries, might also be part of a post-2012 international framework for climate action;