natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
D. ker je učinkovito varstvo morskega okolja in trajnostni ribolov mogoče zagotoviti le s konsenzom in sodelovanjem vseh zainteresiranih držav,
D. whereas effectively protecting the marine environment and practising sustainable fishing are possible only with the consensus and cooperation of all interested States,
E. ker je sistematično zbiranje zanesljivih podatkov temelj za oceno staleža rib in oblikovanje znanstvenega mnenja ter je zato odločilnega pomena za izvajanje skupne ribiške politike in ker Komisija v svojem sporočilu ugotavlja, da ni dovolj podatkov za znanstveno oceno stanja staležev globokomorskih rib ter da obstajajo razhajanja glede njihove opredelitve,
E. whereas the systematic collection of reliable data is the cornerstone of stock assessment and scientific advice, and is therefore of vital importance for the implementation of the common fisheries policy (CFP), and whereas in its Communication the Commission acknowledged the lack of sufficient data to carry out a scientific assessment of the state of deep-sea stocks, and the discrepancies that exist as regards their definition,
F. ker poročilo, ki ga je aprila 2007 objavil svetovalni odbor za ribištvo in ribogojstvo obravnava spremembe časovnega razporeda za predstavitev znanstvenih mnenj in o izboljšanju njihove kakovosti,
F. whereas the report published in April 2007 by the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA) addresses the changing of the timing for the submission of scientific advice and improving its quality,
G. ker je treba sprejeti ustrezne socialno-ekonomske ukrepe za nadomestitev stroškov ribičem zaradi zmanjšanja dejavnosti, povezanih z načrti za obnovitev staležev,
G. whereas appropriate socio-economic measures are necessary to compensate fishermen for the costs of reductions in activity connected with stock recovery plans,
H. ker se je v svoji resoluciji z dne 14. novembra 2006 o tematski strategiji za varstvo in ohranjanje morskega okolja
H. whereas its resolution of 14 November 2006 on a Thematic Strategy on the Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment
131. zavzel za vrsto ukrepov za spodbujanje trajnostne rabe morij in ohranjanje morskih ekosistemov,
131. , advocated a number of measures to promote a sustainable use of the seas and the conservation of marine ecosystems,
3. opozarja, da stalne spremembe predpisov in oblikovanje novih predlogov, še preden so se lahko začeli izvajati obstoječi predlogi in se je lahko obdelalo dobljene informacije, škodi verodostojnosti skupne ribiške politike in da obstoječe omejitve ribolovnega napora nekaterim vrstam bolje ustrezajo kot drugim;
Warns that constant changes in the rules, and the launching of fresh proposals without allowing time to implement existing proposals and adequately process the information obtained, result in a loss of credibility for the CFP and existing effort restrictions have been better suited to some species rather than others;
6. opozarja, da Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike
Notes that Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002) of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy
59. zahteva uporabo previdnostnega pristopa, ki je opredeljen v členu 3 in pomeni, „da odsotnost ustreznih znanstvenih informacij ne sme biti razlog za preložitev ali neukrepanje pri upravljanju za ohranitev ciljnih vrst, z njimi povezanih vrst ali od njih odvisnih vrst in neciljnih vrst ter njihovega okolja“;
59. requires the application of the precautionary approach, defined in Article 3 to mean "that the absence of adequate scientific information should not be used as a reason for postponing or failing to take management measures to conserve target species, associated or dependent species and non-target species and their environment";
8. meni, da mora Komisija v okviru ukrepov za zmanjšanje prilova in prepoved zavržkov uvesti prepoved vseh ribolovnih dejavnosti nad podvodnimi gorami, hidrotermalnimi vrelci in v območju petih milj od vseh identificiranih globokomorskih koral; meni, da je treba prav tako prepovedati ribolov s pridnenimi vlečnimi mrežami pod globino 1000 m, hkrati pa okrepiti postopke za spremljanje in nadzor;
Takes the view that the Commission, within the framework of measures to reduce by-catches and ban discards, should impose a ban on all fishing activity over seamounts, hydrothermal vents and within five miles of all identified cold-water corals; considers that bottom-trawling at depths below 1000m should also be banned, whilst at the same time monitoring and control procedures should be strengthened;
10. poziva Komisijo, naj opravi socialno-ekonomsko oceno globokomorskega ribolova ter analizo vpliva, ki bi ga na ta sektor imelo novo zmanjšanje ribolovnega napora, in vpliva nenehne izčrpanosti staležev rib, od katerih je odvisen ribolov; meni, da je treba nujno najti ravnovesje med socialno-ekonomskimi potrebami in okoljsko trajnostjo;
Calls on the Commission to carry out a socio-economic assessment of deep-sea fisheries and an analysis of the impact that new fishing effort reductions will have on the industry, as well as the impact of continued depletion of the fish stocks that the fisheries depends on; points out that it is crucial to strike a balance between socio-economic needs and environmental sustainability;
15. ponovno poudarja, da je treba prisluhniti ribičem in njihovim organizacijam, ki morajo sodelovati tudi pri oblikovanju ukrepov za varstvo morskega okolja, upravljanje virov in obnavljanje staležev;
Reiterates that fishermen and the associations that represent them must be heard and must be involved in the definition of measures for the protection of the marine environment, the management of resources and stock recovery;
22. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo okolju prijaznejše ribolovne metode, ki niso škodljive za okolje in ekološko raznovrstnost zaradi neželenega prilova ali nepotrebne škode na drugih živih organizmih;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote more environmentally- friendly catching methods which do not harm the environment and ecological biodiversity as a result of unwanted by-catches or unnecessary injury to other living organisms;
Namen sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o pregledu upravljanja staležev globokomorskih rib ( KOM(2007)0030 končno) z dne 29. januarja 2007 je analiza učinkovitosti zakonodaje, veljavne za ribolov vrst, med katerimi so nekatere (ne vse) z nizko rodnostjo in pozno zrelostjo.
The communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the review of the management of deep-sea fish stocks, COM(2007)30 final of 29 January 2007, seeks to analyse the effectiveness of legislation applicable to fishing on these species, some though not all of which are of low productivity and are late-maturing.
Čeprav je ta vrsta ribolova manj razširjena kot priobalni ribolov, ima velik gospodarski pomen za evropsko floto, ki je z njo začela v letih 90, ko so staleži pridnenih vrst, začenši s polenovko, začeli upadati.
Even though these fisheries are small-scale by comparison with shelf fisheries, they are of great economic importance for European fleets, which began fishing these stocks in the 1990s when demersal species, particularly cod, were in decline.
Gre za mešan ribolov, kjer so razmere za večino staležev zelo negotove zaradi premalo razpoložljivih informacij in kjer nekatere vrste, navedene v prilogah, kot so morski pes, oranžna sluzoglavka ali modri leng, niso predmet neposrednega ulova.
These are mixed fisheries where the situation for most stocks is uncertain, given the scant information available, and where several of the species listed in the annexes, such as sharks, orange roughy and blue ling, are not fished directly.
Ker pride včasih do prekrivanja med vodami Skupnosti in območjem upravljanja komisije za ribištvo v severovzhodnem Atlantiku, nastajajo občasno nesporazumi pri oblikah upravljanja.
Since they straddle Community waters and the regulatory area of the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC), disagreements sometimes arise over management arrangements.
Do leta 2003, ko so bile z Uredbo (ES) št. 2340/2002 prvič na podlagi zgodovinskih podatkov dodeljene kvote državam članicam za obdobje 2003-2004, ni veljala nobena posebna ureditev.
There were no specific regulations governing these fisheries until 2003, when quotas were first allocated to Member States for the period 2003-2004, on the basis of historical data, under Regulation (EC) 2340/2002.
Ta dodelitev kvot za ribolovno dejavnost, ki se je že izvajala, je bila zelo sporna, še bolj pa je to postala po spremembi leta 2004, ko so po širitvi dobile svoje kvote tudi nove države članice.
This allocation of quotas in a fishery that was already being exploited proved highly controversial, especially after the 2004 adjustment to cover the enlargement countries.
Problem še zdaleč ni bil rešen ter se je spet pojavil ob nadaljnjem dodeljevanju količine celotnega dovoljenega ulova, kar je privedlo do tega, da nekatere države niso dosegle svojih kvot, druge pa so jih izpolnile že v prvem mesecu v letu.
Instead of being resolved, the problem continued to subsist in subsequent allocations of TACs, with the result that some Member States were not able to use up their quotas whilst others exhausted them in the first months of the year.
Zato da se je upočasnilo razvoj tovrstnega ribolova, je Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2347/2002 uvedla celo vrsto zelo strogih pogojev: posebno ribolovno dovoljenje, omejeno zmogljivost plovil, posebne zahteve glede poročanja in nadzorovanja, obvezne načrte vzorčenja, prisotnost opazovalcev na krovu, zbiranje podatkov ter obvezno iztovarjanje ulova v za to določenih pristaniščih.
Council Regulation (EC) 2347/2002, which aimed to cap the expansion of these fisheries, imposed a series of highly restrictive conditions: the need for special fishing permits, a restriction on vessel capacity and requirements as regards reporting and monitoring, such as compulsory sampling schemes, the presence of observers onboard, the collection of data and the obligation to land catches in designated ports.
Svet je leta 2005 ta odstotek zmanjšal za 10 %, nato zopet za 10 % v letu 2006, da bi omilil družbeno-gospodarske posledice tega ukrepa.
The Council of Ministers cut this percentage to 10% in 2005 plus an additional 10% in 2006 in order to cushion the socio-economic impact of the measure.
Na področju boja proti nezakonitemu ribolovu (neprijavljenemu in neurejenemu) je oktobra 2006 Svet med drugim sprejel predpise, ki prenašajo v pravo Skupnosti sklepe komisije za ribištvo v severovzhodnem Atlantiku o vodah pod njeno pristojnostjo.
As part of the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, in October 2006 the Council also adopted a regulation transposing into Community law the NEAFC’s decisions in waters falling within that RFO's sphere of competence.
Na podlagi novih predpisov plovila, ki bodo opravljala nezakonito dejavnost, ne bodo smela vstopati v pristanišča Skupnosti, ne ribariti v vodah Skupnosti, ter bo prepovedan uvoz rib s teh plovil.
Under the new rules, vessels implicated in illegal activities may not enter Community ports or fish in Community waters, and imports of fish from those vessels are banned.
Države članice ne bodo mogle tem plovilom odobriti, da plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, ter bodo morale uvoznikom, prevoznikom in drugim vključenim sektorjem naročiti, naj ne trgujejo in pretovarjajo rib, ki so jih ujela navedena plovila.
The Member States may not grant them their flag, and they will be obliged to call on importers, transporters and other sectors involved not to handle or tranship any fish caught by them.
Navedeni sklepi, ki zadevajo te vrste rib in so za nekatere vrste zelo strogi, je svet ministrov sprejel v novembru 2006 z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2015/2006, ki določa celotni dovoljeni ulov in kvote za leta 2007 in 2008.
The most recent decisions on these species, which are severely restrictive for some of them, were adopted in the Council of Ministers of November 2006 through Council Regulation (EC) No 2015/2006 setting TACs and quotas for 2007-2008.
Sporočilo želi oceniti učinkovitost ureditve z dveh vidikov: njeno primernost in izvajanje.
The communication aims to assess the effectiveness of the regulations from two points of view: adequacy and implementation.
Ob upoštevanju napredka tovrstnega ribolova in mnogih ukrepov, ki jih že izvaja flota Skupnosti (čeprav ne veljajo za drugo, neevropsko floto, ki ribari na istem območju), ima sporočilo nekoliko alarmantni ton.
Bearing in mind the progress made in these fisheries and the many measures already being implemented by the Community fleet (even though they are not binding on other non-European fleets fishing in the same areas), its tone appears somewhat alarmist.
Očitno je, da je v nekaj zadnjih letih evropsko flota zmanjševala svoj ulov z zniževanjem količine celotnega dovoljenega ulova, z omejevanjem svojih zmogljivosti ter z oblikovanjem varovanih območij.
It is clear that the European fleet has restricted its fishing effort in recent years, through both cuts in TACs and capacity limitation and the creation of protected areas.
Obenem pa imajo nacionalne uprave in pristojni sektor kar nekaj pripomb na ureditev.
At the same time, national administrations and the industry itself have voiced a number of criticisms of the regulations.
Prva pripomba se nanaša na netočnost izraza „globoke vode“.
The first of these concerns the lack of precision of the term ‘deep’ .
Komisija, ki priznava, da o tem ni imela ne bioloških ne znanstvenih informacij, ko je bila ta razvrstitev sprejeta, uporablja ta izraz pri vseh vrstah, ki so ulovljene v globini več kot štiristo metrov, kar vključuje cel spekter vrst, ki nimajo skupne nobene biološke, območne ali morfološke značilnosti.
The Commission, which acknowledges that no biological or scientific information was available on this question when the classification was introduced, applies this term to all species caught at a depth greater than 400 metres, thus merging together a wide range of species which do not have any biological, zonal or morphological characteristics in common.
Zaradi nepoznavanja geografske strukture teh voda in pomanjkanja zanesljivih znanstvenih podatkov so celotni dovoljeni ulov in kvote določeni za upravljanje zelo širokih območij, obenem pa so zelo omejevalni, celo bolj kot določbe, sprejete za vrste, ki spadajo v program za obnovitev staležev.
The lack of knowledge regarding their geographical structure and the lack of reliable scientific data mean that TACs and quotas are not only set for extremely broad management areas but are also highly restrictive, even going beyond the conditions imposed for species subject to recovery plans.
Ker je medtem minilo že kar nekaj časa, bi Komisija morala biti sposobna ločevanja med vrstami , ki so potrebne zaščite zaradi svojih posebnih bioloških značilnosti, od drugih, nepridnenih vrst, v zvezi s katerimi bi bilo potrebno določiti dolgoročne cilje ladjevja.
Given the amount of time that has elapsed, the Commission should be capable of differentiating between species requiring protection owing to their particular biological characteristics and other species that provide an alternative to demersal species and for which long-term fleet objectives should be set.
Komisija je bila že večkrat prisiljena črtati s seznama nekatere vrste in priznati, da gre le za prilov pri globokomorskem ribolovu.
The Commission has already been obliged to withdraw species from the list on more than one occasion and to recognise that they are merely taken as by-catches in shallow-water fisheries.
Poročevalec meni, da mora Komisija nujno odpraviti razlike pri obravnavi različnih vrst, ki niso popolnoma upravičene, ter v najkrajšem možnem času pojasniti nastalo stanje.
In the rapporteur’s view, the Commission should eliminate any differences in treatment for the various species that are not fully justified as a matter of urgency and should clarify the situation as soon as possible.
Jasno je, da kar zadeva primernost sistema celotnega dovoljenega ulova in kvot za upravljanje staležev, pri mešanih vrstah ribolova ni lahko izvajati ukrepov za nadzor nad ulovom ali celotnim dovoljenim ulovom, ki so predpisani le za 9 od 48 vrst iz prilog I in II uredbe.
With regard to the suitability of the TAC and quota system for managing these stocks, it is certainly true that, in mixed fisheries, it is not easy to apply either effort control measures or TACs, which are set for only nine of the 48 species listed in Annexes I and II of the Regulation.
Mnogi opozarjajo na to, da bi se preveliko omejevanje celotnega dovoljenega ulova lahko sprevrglo v povečanje količine zavržkov, zato menijo, da je treba začeti s predhodnimi ocenami in povečanjem nadzora, zlasti nad ladjevjem.
Many people have pointed out that overrestrictive TACs could contribute to a higher number of discards, and they therefore suggest that exploratory assessments should be carried out in advance, in combination with increased monitoring, particularly of fleets.
Omejitve, ki zadevajo modri leng in morski menek, dejansko povzročajo povečanje izvržkov teh vrst kot prilova, ker ti dve vrsti živita v manjših globinah kot druge vrste, na katere se nanaša ta predlog.
The reductions for blue ling, and also for tusk, will indeed result in higher discard rates for these species when taken as by-catches, since these species live closer to the surface than others covered in the proposal.
Drugo pomembno vprašanje je nujna rešitev problema zavržkov oziroma izboljšanje njihovega upravljanja.
A further important issue appears to be the need to tackle the problem of discards , improving management in this area.
Komisija, za katero se zdi, da se želi zadovoljiti s tem, da je sistem obrodil „kakšen učinek“, vendarle priznava potrebo po drugačnih, učinkovitejših ukrepih.
The Commission, which appears to aspire to no more than that the system should have ‘had some effect’, agrees on the need to implement a different and more effective type of measure.
Kar zadeva upravljanje ribolovnega napora z omejevanjem zmogljivosti, Komisija priznava, da je dejstvo, da so med plovila, ki potrebujejo posebna dovoljenja, vključena vsa, ki imajo dovoljenje za ribolov v globokih vodah (ne glede na to, ali bodo lovila v globokih vodah ali ne), povzročilo težave pri nadzoru, obenem pa ni rečeno, da je omejilo dostop plovilom za druge vrste ribolova.
As regards the management of fishing effort through capacity limitation, the Commission recognises that the inclusion of all vessels holding deep-sea licences (whether or not they intend to catch deep-water species) in the definition of vessels requiring special permits has led to control problems whilst at the same time unnecessarily restricting access to other fisheries.
Komisija meni, da je majhna učinkovitost ukrepov za nadzor ribolovnega napora posledica dejstva, da jih nekatere države članice niso upoštevale, kar je privedlo do vprašanj, kakšni ukrepi so bili sprejeti za kaznovanje teh kršitev in zakaj iz spoštovanja do tistih, ki so jih upoštevali, kršitelji niso bili jasno imenovani in kakšni ukrepi so bili zato sprejeti.
The Commission attributes the lack of success achieved by effort control measures to non-compliance by some Member States, which raises the question of what action has been taken in view of this non-compliance and why the offenders have not been clearly identified and corresponding steps taken, given that some Member States have indeed met their commitments.
Kljub nastalim razmeram zbrani podatki o ulovu, ki jih je posredovalo najmanj 10 držav članic, kažejo, da je ulov v letu 2005, v skladu s priporočili komisije za ribištvo v severovzhodnem Atlantiku, predstavljal največ 65 % ulova v letu 2000.
Even so, the data on aggregate effort provided by at least ten Member States indicate that fishing effort in 2005 was at most 65% of that deployed in 2000, in line with the NEAFC recommendations.
Komisija priznava, da bi sedanji nadzor nad mešanimi vrstami ribolova (kljub temu, da so nekatere vrste bolj trajnostne kot druge) moral biti prilagojen vsakemu posameznemu primeru glede na to, ali gre za ribolov določene vrste ali za prilov.
The Commission recognises that current effort controls, which apply to all fisheries combined even though some are more sustainable than others, should be adjusted in each specific case according to the target species and species taken only as a by-catch.
Ni dvoma, da je nujno treba izboljšati količino in kakovost razpoložljivih informacij o različnih vrstah ribolova, zlasti ko gre za vrste iz Priloge II, ter povečati število ljudi in finančna sredstva, namenjena raziskavam.
It is clear that there is an urgent need for more and better information on the various fisheries, especially for the species listed in Annex II, and for more human and financial resources for research.
Kar zadeva prepovedana območja ali ribolovne sektorje, o katerih ni na voljo zanesljivih podatkov, strokovnjaki priporočajo ponovno določitev območij, ki naj bodo manjša, ker bi prepoved na območjih, kjer bi ribolov bil možen, lahko dejansko privedlo do tega, da bi nezakonita plovila lahko nekaznovano ribarila zaradi manjkanja zanimanja zainteresiranih strani, kar bi še bolj zmanjšalo število podatkov, potrebnih za oceno virov na tem območju.
With regard to closed areas, for which no reliable data are available, they advise that these areas should be redefined and made smaller, since closing zones whose exploitation is feasible would lead in practice to illegal vessels fishing with greater impunity, given the lack of fishing interest among the Parties, which would exacerbate the scarcity of data with which to assess stocks in the area.
o upravljanju globokomorskih staležev
on management of deep-sea fish stocks
2. se strinja s Komisijo, da je treba sedanje ravni izkoriščanja globokomorskih staležev nujno zmanjšati in da so se veljavni ukrepi za zaščito teh staležev preslabo izvajali;
Agrees with the Commission that current levels of exploitation of deep-sea stocks must inevitably be reduced and that measures currently in force have been too poorly implemented to have been effective;
6. izraža zaskrbljenost nad neučinkovitostjo in slabim izvajanjem veljavnih uredb; poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša postopke spremljanja in nadzora v državah članicah;
Expresses its concern over the inefficiency and poor implementation of the current Regulations; calls on the Commission to improve monitoring and control procedures in Member States;
11. opozarja na cilje, ki so bili zastavljeni na svetovnem vrhu o trajnostnem razvoju septembra 2002 v Johannesburgu, zlasti ohranjanje ali obnavljanje staležev do stopenj, ki omogočajo največji trajnostni donos, s čimer bi države te cilje čim hitreje dosegle za izčrpane staleže, po možnosti najpozneje do leta 2015;
Recalls the targets established at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg on September 2002, in particular to maintain or restore fish stocks to levels that can produce the maximum sustainable yield with the aim of achieving these goals for depleted stocks on an urgent basis and where possible not later than 2015;
13. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo okolju prijaznejše ribolovne metode, ki niso škodljive za okolje in ekološko raznovrstnost zaradi neželenega prilova ali nepotrebne škode na drugih živih organizmih;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote more environment friendly catching methods which do not harm the environment and the ecological biodiversity as a result of unwanted by-catches or unnecessary injury to other living organisms;
Reformirani Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji naproti
on ‘Towards a reform of the World Trade Organisation’
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................16
OPINION of the Committee on development ......................................................16
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................20
OPINION of the Committee on ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS ............20