natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V skladu s členom 3(6) je Komisija pripravila predlog, da se na seznam doda Konvencija o pristopu Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike h Konvenciji o uporabi prava v pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih, ki je bila dana v podpis v Rimu dne 19. junija 1980, in k Prvemu in Drugemu protokolu o njeni razlagi s strani Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 3, paragraph 6, the Commission has drawn up a proposal with a view to adding to this list the Convention on the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980, and to the First and Second Protocols on the interpretation thereof by the Court of Justice of the European Communities.
Namen tega priporočila Komisije za sklep Sveta je prilagoditev navedenih konvencij in protokolov zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije v skladu s členom 3(4) Akta o pristopu.
This recommendation for a Council decision put forward by the Commission seeks to make the adjustments required by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the above‑mentioned conventions and protocols, in accordance with Article 3, paragraph 4, of the Act of Accession.
Posledica tega je, da se ne uporablja postopek privolitve, temveč se s Parlamentom le posvetuje.
As a result, the assent procedure does not apply, and Parliament is merely consulted.
Posledice pristopa
Consequences of accession
Posledice pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije h konvenciji je mogoče povzeti takole:
The consequences of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention may be summarised as follows:
a) Besedila rimske konvencije iz leta 1980 in protokolov v bolgarskem in romunskem jeziku bodo verodostojna pod enakimi pogoji kot besedila teh instrumentov v drugih jezikih Evropske unije.
(a) the text of the 1980 Rome Convention and the protocols in Bulgarian and Romanian shall be authentic under the same conditions as the texts and instruments in the other languages of the Union;
b) Sodišča novih držav članic lahko na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti naslovijo vprašanje v predhodno odločanje glede razlage določb rimske konvencije iz leta 1980 ali njenih protokolov.
(b) the courts of the new Member States may refer to the Court of Justice a question for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of the provisions of the 1980 Rome Convention or the protocols;
c) V skladu s členoma 23 in 24 rimske konvencije lahko nove države članice zahtevajo posvetovanje o izbiri novega kolizijskega pravila, ki ga želi sprejeti neka pogodbenica, ali o večstranskih konvencijah o pravilih mednarodnega zasebnega prava v zvezi z zadevami, ki jih ureja rimska konvencija.
(c) in accordance with Articles 23 and 24 of the Rome Convention, the new Member States may request that consultations be held on any new choice of law rule which a contracting party wishes to adopt or on multilateral conventions laying down rules of private international law concerning any of the matters governed by the Rome Convention;
d) Nove države članice lahko zahtevajo posvetovanje v skladu s členom 25 rimske konvencije.
(d) the new Member States may request that consultations be arranged in accordance with Article 25 of the Rome Convention;
d) Na podlagi člena 26 lahko nove države članice zahtevajo tudi revizijo rimske konvencije.
(e) under Article 26, new Member States may also ask for the revision of the Rome Convention;
f) Zaradi splošnega področja uporabe konvencije se s pristopom Bolgarije in Romunije ne spremeni razmerje med državami članicami in Evropsko unijo, kar zadeva veljavno pravo.
(f) in view of the universal scope of the Convention, the accession of Bulgaria and Romania does not change the situation between EU Member States as regards the applicable law.
Poročevalec opozarja, da bo rimska konvencija tudi po začetku veljavnosti uredbe o veljavnem pravu za obveznosti, ki je trenutno v prvi obravnavi postopka soodločanja, še naprej veljala za Dansko in po možnosti za Združeno kraljestvo, ter poziva k čimprejšnjemu sprejetju predloga sklepa Sveta, da bosta lahko novi državi članici svojo zakonodajo prilagodili pravu Skupnosti.
While recalling that, even after the entry into force of the regulation on the law applicable to obligations which is at first reading in the codecision procedure, the Rome Convention will remain in force for Denmark and, possibly, also for the UK, your rapporteur recommends the adoption of the recommendation for a Council decision at the earliest opportunity in order to allow the two new Member States to bring their legislation into line with Community law.
Pristop Bolgarije in Romunije h Konvenciji o uporabi prava v pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih, ki je bila dana v podpis v Rimu dne 19. junija 1980
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980
o predlogu sklepa Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic Evropske unije, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o sklenitvi Sporazuma o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Združenimi državami Amerike na drugi
on the proposal for a decision of the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the conclusion of the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other hand
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic Evropske unije, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta ( KOM(2006)0169 )
– having regard to the proposal for a decision of the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Members States of the European Union, meeting within the Council ( COM(2006)0169 )
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic Evropske unije, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o podpisu in začasni uporabi Sporazuma o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Združenimi državami Amerike na drugi, ki vsebuje osnutek sporazuma, ki sta ga podpisali delegaciji EU in ZDA 30. aprila 2007 (8044/3/2007),
– having regard to the Decision of the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Members States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the signature and provisional application of the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Members States, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other hand, containing the draft agreement as signed between the EU and US delegations on 30 April 2007 (8044/3/2007),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. januarja 2006 o razvijanju agende zunanje letalske politike Skupnosti
– having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2006 on developing the agenda for the Community's external aviation policy
UL C 287 E, 24.11.2006, str.
OJ C 287 E, 24.11.2006, p.84. ,
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0071 . ,
Texts adopted , P6_TA(2007)0071 . ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 80(2) in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe o ES,
– having regard to Articles 80(2) and 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0210/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0210/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6–0320/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0320/2007 ),
Letalskemu sporazumu EU–ZDA naproti
Towards an EU-US aviation agreement
Ti dvostranski sporazumi vsebujejo določbe, za katere je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti novembra 2002 razsodilo, da so nezdružljive z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
These bilateral agreements contain provisions that the European Court of Justice ruled in November 2002 to be incompatible with Community law.
Zato je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se oblikuje nov pravni okvir za odnose EU-Združene države na področju letalstva, pogajanja o Sporazumu o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Združenimi državami Amerike na drugi pa je vodila Evropska komisija na podlagi pooblastila, ki ji ga je junija 2003 dal Svet.
Therefore it was decided to create a new legal framework for UE-US aviation relations and negotiations on an Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other hand, were conducted by the European Commission under a mandate received from the Council in June 2003.
V tem pooblastilu je določen cilj, da je treba vzpostaviti odprt zračni prostor (OAA) med EU in ZDA, s čimer bi se oblikoval enotni trg za zračni promet med EU in Združenimi državami, na katerem bi se naložbe lahko prosto pretakale in na katerem bi lahko letalski prevozniki EU in ZDA zagotavljali storitve zračnega promet brez kakršnihkoli omejitev, tudi na domačih trgih obeh pogodbenic.
This mandate set the objective of establishing an Open Aviation Area (OAA) between the EU and US, creating a single market for air transport between the EU and US in which investment could flow freely and in which European and US airlines would be able to provide air services without any restriction, including in the domestic markets of both parties.
Uresničitev pooblastila v celoti bi zahtevala bistvene zakonodajne spremembe v Združenih državah, zlasti pri odpravi sedanjih pravnih omejitev za tuje lastništvo in nadzor letalskih prevoznikov ZDA ter pri kabotaži.
Achievement of the mandate in full would require significant legislative changes in the United States, in particular to remove the existing legal restrictions on foreign ownership and control of US airlines and on cabotage.
Ta vprašanja so v ZDA še vedno politično izredno občutljiva.
These issues remain extremely politically sensitive in the US.
Zato je pooblastilo priznalo možnost izvajanja sporazuma po stopnjah, če so podana jamstva za napredovanje v naslednje stopnje.
For this reason, the mandate recognised the possibility of implementing an agreement in a staged approach, provided that guarantees for progression to subsequent stages are given.
EU je med pogajanji pristala na to, da kabotaže ni mogoče vključiti v sporazum na prvi stopnji, vendar je Združenim državam dala jasno vedeti, da bi bil sporazum na prvi stopnji za EU sprejemljiv le, če bi bil dosežen pomemben napredek pri umiku omejitev za lastništvo in nadzor letalskih prevoznikov ZDA.
The EU accepted during the negotiations that cabotage could not be included in a first-stage agreement, but made clear to the US that a first-stage agreement would be acceptable to the EU only if meaningful progress was made towards the removal of restrictions on ownership and control of US airlines.
Ameriško ministrstvo za promet je novembra 2005 kot odgovor izdalo obvestilo o predlaganem oblikovanju predpisov, ki bi drugače razlagali zakonsko zahtevo, da letalske prevoznike ZDA „dejansko nadzorujejo“ državljani Združenih držav, s čimer bi se razširile možnosti, da bi tuji državljani vlagali v letalske prevoznike ZDA in sodelovali pri njihovem upravljanju.
In response to this the US Department of Transportation (DOT) issued a "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" (NPRM) in November 2005 that would re-interpret the statutory requirement for US airlines to be under the "actual control" of US citizens so as to expand opportunities for foreign citizens to invest in and participate in the management of US airlines.
S tem ukrepom bi bila EU zadovoljna, če bi se obvestilo o predlaganem oblikovanju predpisov sprejelo kot končni predpis, ki bi pomenil jasne, pomembne in korenite spremembe politike ZDA glede lastništva in nadzora.
This step was sufficient for the EU, provided that the NPRM would be adopted as a final rule that would constitute clear, meaningful and robust changes to US policy on ownership and control.
Vendar se je ameriško ministrstvo za promet po pregledu velikega števila javnih komentarjev, vključno s tistimi, ki jih je podal kongres ZDA, decembra 2006 odločilo umakniti obvestilo o predlaganem oblikovanju predpisov.
The DOT however decided in December 2006 to withdraw the NPRM, after reviewing a multitude of public comments, including those received from the US Congress.
To je pripeljalo do novega kroga pogajanj o osnutku sporazuma, ki so bila potrebna, da bi bil ta drugače sprejemljiv za EU.
This made a new round of negotiations on the draft agreement necessary, to make it in another way acceptable for the EU side.
Rezultat pogajanj je bil nov osnutek sporazuma z dne 2. marca 2007, ki je bil podpisan na vrhu EU-ZDA 30. aprila 2007.
These resulted in a new draft agreement on 2 March 2007, which was signed at the EU-US summit of 30 April 2007.
Svet je potrdil osnutek sporazuma in se odločil, da ga začne začasno uporabljati s 30. marcem 2008.
The Council endorsed the draft agreement and decided to apply it provisionally as from 30 March 2008.
Prva presoja Parlamenta
Parliament's first appreciation
Parlament se je hitro odzval na nov osnutek sporazuma s svojo resolucijo z dne 14. marca 2007 o sklenitvi sporazuma o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Združenimi državami Amerike na drugi (T6-0071/2007).
Parliament responded swiftly to the new draft agreement by means of its Resolution of 14 March 2007 on the conclusion of the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other hand (T6-0071/2007).
Sporazum na prvi stopnji je Parlament pozdravil kot pomemben korak v smeri vzpostavitve povezanega čezatlantskega letalskega trga, ki bo koristil potrošnikom.
It welcomed the first-stage Agreement as an important step towards an integrated transatlantic aviation market that will be to the benefit of consumers.
Čeprav bi bila za Parlament bolj zaželena sklenitev enega samega uravnoteženega splošnega sporazuma, je lahko sprejel pristop po stopnjah, ker so v členu 21 osnutka sporazuma navedene vsebinske postavke in jasen časovni razpored pogajanj o sporazumu na drugi stopnji, vključno z določbami, ki strankam omogočajo, da zamrznejo pravice, določene v sporazumu na prvi stopnji, če 30 mesecev po začetku pogajanj o sporazumu na drugi stopnji, še vedno ni bil dosežen takšen sporazum.
Although it would have preferred the conclusion of one balanced overall agreement, it could accept the phased approach, because in Article 21 of the draft agreement an agenda and a clear timetable for negotiations on a second-stage agreement is given, including provisions allowing other parties to suspend rights specified in the first-stage agreement, if 30 months after the start of negotiations on a second-stage agreement no such agreement has been reached.
Sporazum na drugi stopnji mora obravnavati vprašanja, kot so kabotaža, pravica do ustanavljanja, lastništvo in dejanski nadzor ter državna pomoč.
A second-stage agreement should deal with issues as cabotage, right of establishment, ownership and de facto control and state aid.
Parlament je tudi opazil, da se v osnutku sporazuma le delno obravnava razvoj regulativnega približevanja in je to v veliki meri prepuščeno skupnemu odboru.
Parliament also noted that the development of regulatory convergence is only partially dealt with in the draft agreement and is left to a large extent to the joint committee.
Kljub temu je Parlament pozdravil sodelovanje med organi EU in ZDA, ki so pristojni za varnost na področju letalstva.
Nevertheless, Parliament welcomed cooperation between the EU and US authorities responsible for the field of aviation safety.
V zvezi z varnostjo je priznal pomembnost varnostnih ukrepov za letalstvo, ti pa bi morali temeljiti na ustrezni oceni tveganja in ne bi smeli biti pretirani ali neusklajeni.
As for security, the importance of security measures for aviation was recognised but they should be based on a proper risk assessment and not be excessive or uncoordinated.
ZDA in Komisija bi morale ponovno preveriti učinkovitost dodatnih ukrepov, ki so bili uvedeni po letu 2001, da se odpravijo podvajanja in šibki členi v varnostni verigi.
The efficiency of additional measures introduced since 2001 should be reviewed by the US and the Commission, so as to eliminate overlapping and weak links in the security chain.
Parlament je zagovarjal koncept „enkratnega varnostnega pregleda“, in sicer pregleda potnikov in prtljage le na začetku njihovega potovanja ter ne ponovno ob vsakem prestopanju.
The concept of 'one stop security', checking passengers and luggage only at the start of their journey and not again at every transfer, was advocated.
Pri izmenjavi osebnih podatkov potnikov med EU in ZDA bi bilo treba spoštovati zasebnost evropskih državljanov in državljanov ZDA.
The privacy of European and US citizens should be respected when personal passenger data are exchanged between the EU and the US.
Parlament se je poleg tega strinjal, da ima letalski sektor več negativnih učinkov na okolje, zlasti kot vir hrupa in ker prispeva k podnebnim spremembam, ter da se bodo z rastjo letalskega prometa ti učinki povečevali.
Furthermore is was recognised that the aviation sector has several negative environmental effects, in particular as a source of noise and as a contributor to climate change, and that these effects will increase with the growth of aviation.
Poudaril je, da morata tako EU kot ZDA sprejeti učinkovite ukrepe za zmanjšanje negativnega vpliva letalstva na okolje.
The need for both the EU and the US to take effective measures to reduce the negative environmental impact of aviation was underlined.
V zvezi s tem je Parlament pozdravil predlog Komisije o vključitvi letalstva v evropski sistem trgovanja z emisijami, poudaril pa je tudi, da bodo že v zgodnji fazi potrebni pogovori z ZDA o vključitvi čezatlantskega zračnega prometa v evropski sistem trgovanja z emisijami do leta 2012.
In that respect it welcomed the Commission proposal to include aviation in the European emissions trading system, but also pointed out that talks will need to be held with the US at an early stage with a view to encompassing transatlantic air traffic within the European emissions trading system by 2012.
Končno morajo vse interesne skupine EU in ZDA s področja letalstva uvesti stalni dialog o družbenih standardih, katerega cilj je spodbujanje medsebojnega razumevanja, enakih konkurenčnih pogojev in ugodnih socialnih standardov, pri čemer se mora uporabljati mednarodna socialna zakonodaja.
Finally, US and EU aviation stakeholders should enter into a continuous dialogue on social standards, with the aim of promoting mutual understanding, a level playing field and high social standards at the same time and international social legislation should be applied.
Parlament je pozval Komisijo, naj zagotovi popolno obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta in posvetovanje z njim pred in med pogajanji na drugi stopnji, ter pozdravil redna srečanja poslancev Evropskega parlamenta in kongresa ZDA, da bi razpravljali o vseh pomembnih vprašanjih v zvezi z letalskim sporazumom med EU in ZDA .
Parliament called on the Commission to ensure full information and consultation of the European Parliament before and throughout second-stage negotiations and welcomed regular meetings between Members of the European Parliament and the US Congress to discuss all relevant issues concerning an EU-US aviation agreement.
Poročevalec si bo zato prizadeval za bolj sistematičen dialog in izmenjavo informacij neposredno z vlado in kongresom ZDA, da se izboljša spremljanje izvajanja veljavnega sporazuma in priprave sporazuma na drugi stopnji.
The Rapporteur will, therefore, look for a more systematic dialogue and exchange of information directly with the US Administration and Congress with a view to better monitor the implementation of the current agreement and the preparation of the second-stage agreement.
Dodatne opombe
Additional remarks
Svet je s pismom z dne 7. junija 2007 zaprosil Parlament za mnenje o osnutku sporazuma.
The Council has asked Parliament by letter of 7 June 2007 to give its opinion on the draft Agreement.
Z istim pismom je Svet obvestil Parlament, da se bo sporazum začel začasno uporabljati s 30. marcem 2008.
In the same letter, the Council informed Parliament that the Agreement will be applied provisionally as from 30 March 2008.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih ugotovitev o tem, kako je bil dosežen ta sporazum, in resolucije Parlamenta z dne 14. marca 2007 poročevalec predlaga odobritev sporazuma.
In the light of the remarks above on the way to this Agreement and Parliament's Resolution of 14 March 2007, your Rapporteur proposes to approve the Agreement.
Hkrati poudarja, da je treba vsa vprašanja, ki niso zadostno vključena v ta sporazum na prvi stopnji, obravnavati v sporazumu na drugi stopnji.
At the same time, he underlines the need to address all the issues not included sufficiently in this first-stage agreement to be dealt with in the second-stage agreement.
Sporazum o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo Združenimi državami Amerike
Air Transport Agreement between the EC and the USA
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor .............................................................25
OPINION of the Committee on Budgetary Control ........................................27
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN O FINANČNI SKLADNOSTI...................................35
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS ON FINANCIAL COMPATIBILITY.....38
o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0122 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0122 )
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0116/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0116/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenj odbora za proračun in odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6‑0321/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0321/2007 ),
(10) Ker ni potrebe, da bi države članice Komisijo obvestile, kako so se odločile ali kako nameravajo ponovno uporabiti ukinjena sredstva in spremeniti finančni načrt za zadevni program razvoja podeželja, se drugi pododstavek člena 33(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 črta.
(10) Since there is no need for Member States to inform the Commission on the way they have decided or plan to reuse the cancelled funds and to amend the financing plan for the rural development programme concerned, the second subparagraph of Article 33(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 should be deleted.
(12) Treba je pojasniti pravno podlago za sprejetje podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
(12) It is necessary to clarify the legal basis for the adoption of detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.