natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pri drugem pododstavku člena 8a, ki določa, da se generalnemu direktorju dovoli, da zaključkov in priporočil, ki so bili sprejeti ob koncu preiskave, ne pošlje zadevni osebi, je treba pojasniti, da se to lahko zgodi samo po prejetju mnenja revizijskega svetovalca, čigar vloga je ta, da spremlja nadzor nad postopkovnimi jamstvi sodelovanja vpletenih strani.
In the second subparagraph of Article 8a, which allows the Director General to opt not to send the person concerned the conclusions and recommendations adopted on completion of the investigation, it should be made clear that such a decision may only be reached after consulting the Review Advisor, whose role is to ensure compliance with the procedural guarantees provided for those concerned in the investigation.
Zato je treba na ta način spremeniti člen 14(4) predloga.
Article 14(4) of the proposal should be amended accordingly.
Tretji pododstavek člena 10(2) je treba spremeniti, da se tako pojasni, da ima oseba, ki je vpletena v preiskavo, možnost, da izrazi svoje mnenje o zadevi vsaj v pisni obliki , in da se to mnenje posreduje zadevni državi članici, skupaj z ostalimi podatki, ki so bili pridobljeni med preiskavo.
The last subparagraph of Article 10(2) should be amended to stipulate that the person implicated by the investigation should have the opportunity to comment at least in writing on the matters concerning him and that his comments should be forwarded to the Member State concerned together with the other information obtained in the course of the investigation.
Samo tako se lahko zadevnim nacionalnim organom ponudi popolno in do državljanov spoštljivo predstavitev dejstev.
This is the only way of ensuring that the national authorities concerned receive a full account of the facts while upholding the principle that both sides should have the opportunity to put their case.
Nadalje bi se lahko spremenilo tudi člen 15a in člen 15b, da se tako upošteva novi regulativni postopek s pregledom, ki je bil uveden s Sklepom Sveta z dne 17. julija 2006 o spremembi Sklepa 1999/468/ES o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil (komitologija).
Finally, Articles 15a and 15b could be amended to take account of the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny introduced by the Council decision of 17 July 2006 amending Council Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (commitology).
Zlasti bi bilo treba nadomestiti sklicevanje na člen 5 tega sklepa s sklicevanjem na člen 5a, da se tako začne uporabljati novi postopek in se omogoči Evropskemu parlamentu, da ima pri teh zadevah vidnejšo vlogo.
In particular, the reference to Article 5 of the decision should be replaced by a reference to Article 5a of that decision, to enable the new procedure to be applied, thereby enabling the European Parliament to play a greater role.
V ta namen se doda nova uvodna izjava 17.
To that end, a new Recital 17 is proposed.
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
To ne vpliva na morebitno širšo zaščito, ki bi lahko bila na voljo na podlagi pravil Pogodb, Kadrovskih predpisov in katerih koli ustreznih nacionalnih predpisov.
That does not affect any more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties, the Staff Regulations and any relevant national provisions.
To ne vpliva na morebitno širšo zaščito, ki bi lahko bila na voljo na podlagi pravil Pogodb, vključno s Protokolom o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti, Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah, Statuta poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti in katerih koli drugih veljavnih nacionalnih predpisov.
That does not affect any more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties, including the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and any other relevant national provisions .
Posebej je treba poudariti poseben značaj Statuta poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, ki so del organa Evropske unije, pristojnega za izvajanje.
There is a need to highlight the specific nature of the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, as part of the institution responsible for the executive power of the European Union.
(5a) Preiskava zadeve evropskega poslanca s strani Urada lahko – poleg spreminjanja običajnega zaporedja izvajanja nadzora zakonodajalca – nepopravljivo škoduje zadevnemu poslancu; zato je treba vsako tako preiskavo opraviti le pod pogoji, določenimi v Statuta poslancev Evropskega parlamenta.
(5a) An investigation by the Office into the affairs of a Member of the European Parliament may – in addition to subverting the normal order for the exercise of scrutiny by the legislature – irreparably harm the Member concerned; consequently, any such investigation should be carried out only under the terms and conditions laid down in the Statute for Members of the European Parliament.
Treba je preprečiti, da upravni postopek škoduje moralni integriteti poslanca.
There is a need to avoid administrative procedures occasioning prejudice to Members’ moral integrity.
Treba je tudi vzpostaviti sodelovanje med nadzornim odborom in Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo, tako da se nadzornemu odboru brez poseganja v neodvisni status članov omogoči, da v okviru strukturiranega dialoga sprejme predstavnike navedenih institucij.
It is also necessary to establish cooperation between the Supervisory Committee and the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, by enabling the Supervisory Committee, without affecting the independence of its members, to meet representatives of those institutions in the context of a structured dialogue.
Treba je tudi vzpostaviti sodelovanje med nadzornim odborom in Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo, tako da se nadzornemu odboru brez poseganja v neodvisni status članov omogoči, da v okviru strukturiranega dialoga sprejme predstavnike navedenih institucij ob polnem spoštovanju neodvisnosti institucij v pravnem okviru Evropske unije .
It is also necessary to establish cooperation between the Supervisory Committee and the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, by enabling the Supervisory Committee, without affecting the independence of its members, to meet representatives of those institutions in the context of a structured dialogue and with full respect for the institutions' independence within the European Union's legal framework.
Neodvisnost organov Skupnosti je treba ohraniti in se jih ne sme podvreči kontroli upravne instance, kot je urad OLAF.
There is a need to preserve the independence of the Community institutions, which cannot be subject to control by an administrative body such as OLAF.
(16a) Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje te uredbe, bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil 1 .
(16a) The measures required to implement this Regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission 1 .
Komisiji bi bilo treba podeliti pooblastila zlasti za sprejetje posebnih ukrepov za izvajanje te uredbe, predvsem na področju postopkovnih jamstev v upravnih preiskavah, ki jih opravlja Urad.
In particular, power shall be delegated to the Commission to adopt specific measures for the implementation of this Regulation, particularly with regard to the application of procedural guarantees in administrative investigations by the Office.
Treba je pojasniti referenčni ureditveni okvir ukrepov za izvajanje te uredbe.
The legal framework for measures to implement this regulation should be clearly specified.
Navedena odločitev upošteva tudi potrebo po učinkoviti uporabi sredstev Urada ter sorazmernost uporabljenih sredstev.
That decision shall also take account of the need for efficient utilisation of the Office’s resources and for proportionality in the means deployed.
Upoštevane bodo tudi anonimne prijave, če je sum v zadostni meri utemeljen.
Anonymous information may also be taken into account if it constitutes sufficiently strong grounds for suspicion.
Dodatek pojasnjuje, da se lahko preiskava uvede na podlagi anonimne prijave.
The addition is intended to clarify the point that an investigation can be opened on the basis of anonymous information.
Zaradi učinkovitega boja proti goljufiji in korupciji anonimnost ne more biti razlog za izključitev, saj bi strah pred razkritjem imena prijavitelja lahko le-tega odvrnil od prijave.
Against a background of effective action to combat fraud and corruption, anonymity must not be made a reason to reject information, since otherwise there is a danger that people will not come forward with information for fear of their name being made public.
Člen 5 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Odločitev o začetku zunanje preiskave sprejme generalni direktor Urada na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo zadevne države članice ali Komisije.
The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director‑General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or the Commission.
Odločitev o začetku zunanje preiskave sprejme generalni direktor Urada na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo zadevne države članice , Komisije ali Evropskega parlamenta .
The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director‑General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or the Commission or the European Parliament .
S predlogom spremembe se želi natančno določiti, da o začetku zunanje preiskave odloča generalni direktor, preiskave pa se ne sprožijo samo na zahtevo države članice ali Komisije ampak tudi na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta.
It should be clear that the Director General may open external investigations in response to requests by the European Parliament as well as a Member State or the Commission.
Člen 5 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 3
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Dokler Urad opravlja notranjo preiskavo v smislu te uredbe, institucije, organi, uradi ali agencije ne začnejo opravljati vzporedne preiskave istih dejanj.
While the Office is conducting an internal investigation within the meaning of this Regulation, the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies shall not open a parallel investigation into the same facts.
Tudi kadar Urad opravlja notranjo preiskavo v smislu te uredbe, institucije, organi, uradi ali agencije lahko začnejo opravljati vzporedne preiskave istih dejanj , ki imajo za namen širše sodelovanje z uradom OLAF .
Even if the Office is conducting an internal investigation within the meaning of this Regulation, the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies may open a parallel investigation into the same facts , which should be conducted on the basis of the fullest possible cooperation with OLAF .
Jasno je, da se na eni strani namreč ne more prepovedati instituciji, da bi sama izvedla upravno preiskavo v okviru svojih notranjih nadzornih pristojnosti, na drugi strani pa bi bila zahteva za sodelovanje v popolnem soglasju s strukturnim dialogom med uradom OLAF in institucijami, ki je predviden v členu 11a predloga Komisije.
It is obvious that it is impossible to forbid an institution to conduct an investigation in connection with its internal oversight powers and that, this being so, requiring cooperation between the different investigations fully accords with the 'structural dialogue' between OLAF and the institutions referred to in Article 11a of the Commission proposal.
Člen 1 –točka 5
Article 1 – point 5
Člen 7a – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 7a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Če preiskava pokaže , da bi lahko bil član, vodilni delavec, uradnik ali drugi uslužbenec ali oseba v službi institucije, organa, urada ali agencije ali gospodarskega subjekta vpleten v zadevo, se zadevna oseba obvesti , pod pogojem, da to ne ovira poteka preiskave.
As soon as an investigation reveals that a member, manager, official or other servant or a person serving an institution, body, office or agency or an economic operator may be implicated in a matter, the person concerned shall be informed, provided that this does not prejudice the conduct of the investigation.
Če obstajajo trdni dokazi , da bi lahko bil član, vodilni delavec, uradnik ali drugi uslužbenec ali oseba v službi institucije, organa, urada ali agencije ali gospodarskega subjekta osebno vpleten v zadevo, se zadevna oseba obvesti prek ustreznega sporočila, ki jasno navaja dejanje, ki ga je zadevna oseba domnevno zagrešila, na kakšen način je oseba vpletena, katera postopkovna jamstva so predvidena njej v prid, in zlasti, na kakšen način lahko predstavi pripombe in ustrezne dokumente, za katere meni, da so pomembni.
As soon as there is solid evidence that a member, manager, official or other servant or a person serving an institution, body, office or agency or an economic operator may be personally implicated in a matter, the person concerned shall be informed by means of an approp ria te communication giving precise details of the action he is alleged to have committed, the capacity in which he is involved in the matter, what procedural guarantees are provided for his benefit and, in particular, how he can submit any observations and documents which he considers relevant.
Kadar se presodi, da bi pošiljanje tega obvestila oviralo potek preiskave , se lahko naredi izjemo .
Where it is deemed that the despatch of such a communication would prejudice the conduct of the investigation , exceptions may be made .
Zadevna oseba se obvesti s sporočilom, če obstajajo resni znaki za vpletenost.
The person concerned should be informed in a communication that there is solid evidence of their involvement.
Sporočilo mora vsebovati zgoraj navedeno vsebino, da bi zadevni osebi omogočili ustrezen odziv.
The communication should include the abovementioned information so as to enable the person concerned to react appropriately.
Vendar pa se lahko sprejme sklep, da se to poročilo ne pošlje, če se presodi, da bi to lahko škodovalo preiskavi.
A decision not to send such a communication can, of course, be taken if it is deemed that to do so would be detrimental to the investigation.
Člen 7 a – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 2
Article 7 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Vpletena oseba mora skupaj s povabilom, naj odda pripombe, prejeti povzetek takih zadev.
That person must be given a summary of such matters in the invitation to comment.
Vpletena fizična ali pravna oseba ima pravico, da se izogne samoobtožbi .
A person implicated personally shall be entitled to avoid self ‑incrimination .
Vpletena fizična ali pravna oseba ima pravico, da ne priča proti sami sebi .
A person implicated personally shall be entitled not to testify against himself.
Pisni postopek je bistveno jamstvo v državah Evropske unije in pravica, da ne pričaš proti samemu sebi je širša od pravice „izogniti se samoobtožbi“.
The right not to testify against oneself is broader than the right to avoid self-incrimination.
Člen 7a – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 3
Article 7a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
V primerih, ko je treba zaradi preiskave ohranjati strogo tajnost in ko je treba uporabljati preiskovalne metode, ki spadajo v pristojnost nacionalnih sodnih organov ali, v primeru zunanje preiskave, pristojnega nacionalnega organa, lahko generalni direktor Urada odloči, da bo odložil izpolnjevanje obveznosti, da vpleteni osebi da možnost predstaviti svoje mnenje.
In cases requiring absolute secrecy to be maintained for the sake of the investigation and entailing use of investigative proceedings falling under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority or, in the case of an external investigation, that of a competent national authority, the Director‑General of the Office may decide to defer fulfilment of the obligation to ask the person implicated to make his views known.
Najprej bo obvestil revizijskega svetovalca, ki bo predložil mnenje v skladu s členom 14(3).
He shall first notify the Review Adviser, who shall give an opinion in accordance with Article 14(3).
V primeru notranje preiskave generalni direktor sprejme odločitev sporazumno z institucijo, organom, uradom ali agencijo, kateri pripada zadevna oseba.
In the case of an internal investigation, the Director‑General of the Office shall take his decision in agreement with the institution, body, office or agency to which the person concerned belongs.
V primerih, ko obstaja potreba po zaupnosti preiskave in ko je treba uporabljati preiskovalne metode, ki spadajo v pristojnost nacionalnih sodnih organov ali, v primeru zunanje preiskave, pristojnega nacionalnega organa, lahko generalni direktor Urada odloči, da bo odložil izpolnjevanje obveznosti, da bo poslal obvestilo iz odstavka 2 vpleteni osebi ali od nje zahteval, da predstavi svoje mnenje.
In cases where the investigation needs to be conducted on a confidential basis and entailing use of investigative proceedings falling under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority or, in the case of an external investigation, that of a competent national authority, the Director‑General of the Office may decide to defer fulfilment of the obligation to send the communication referred to in the second paragraph or to ask the person implicated to make his views known.
Omejitve pravic in jamstev preiskovane osebe, ki so predvidene v tem členu, so dovoljene samo, če je to skladno z mnenjem, ki ga je predhodno sprejel revizijski svetovalec v skladu s členom 4(3).
Restricting the rights of the person implicated by the investigation and the guarantees afforded him as provided for in this Article shall be permissible only if such restrictions are in accordance with the opinion adopted beforehand by the Review Adviser pursuant to Article 4(3).
S predlogom spremembe se želi pojasniti, da so omejitve pravic in jamstev preiskovane osebe, predvidene v členu 7a zaradi potrebe po zaupnosti preiskave ali vpletenosti nacionalnih organov, dovoljene samo, če je to skladno z mnenjem, ki ga je predhodno sprejel revizijski svetovalec v skladu s členom 14(3).
The wording should make it clear that the restrictions provided for in Article 7a of the rights of the person under investigation and the guarantees afforded him on the grounds of confidentiality or the involvement of national authorities may be imposed only if they conform with the opinion adopted beforehand by the Review Adviser in accordance with Article 4(3) .
Člen 7a – odstavek 3
Article 7a – paragraph 3
Povabilo na razgovor, s pričo ali z osebo, ki je vpletena v smislu odstavka 2, mora biti poslano vsaj osem delovnih dni vnaprej; ta rok se lahko skrajša s soglasjem osebe, ki prihaja na razgovor.
The invitation to any interview, whether with a witness or with a person implicated personally within the meaning of paragraph 2, must be sent with at least eight working days’ notice; the period of notice may be shortened with the agreement of the person to be interviewed.
Če se med razgovorom izkaže, da bi lahko bila oseba, ki je prišla na razgovor kot priča , vpletena v dejstva, ki so predmet preiskave, se takoj začnejo uporabljati postopkovna pravila iz odstavka 2.
When, in the course of the interview, evidence emerges that the person interviewed as a witness may be involved in the facts under investigation, the procedural rules provided for in paragraph 2 shall apply at once.
Poleg tega je treba, od trenutka, ko v preiskavo osebno vpletena oseba že koristi takšna jamstva, pojasniti, da je samo oseba, ki je zaslišana kot priča, obravnavana kot vpleteno v zadevna dejanja, in da se uporabljajo jamstva, predvidena v členu 7a(2).
Also, as procedural guarantees already apply to persons implicated personally, the wording should make it clear that the procedural guarantees provided for in Article 7a(2) apply only to persons interviewed as witnesses who could be regarded as involved in the facts under investigation.
Člen 7a – odstavek 4
Article 7a – paragraph 4
a) v morebitno širšo zaščito, ki bi lahko bila na voljo na podlagi pravil Pogodbe in katerih koli ustreznih nacionalnih predpisov;
(a) to more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties or any relevant national provisions;
a) v morebitno širšo zaščito, ki bi lahko bila na voljo na podlagi pravil Pogodbe , Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije in katerih koli drugih ustreznih nacionalnih predpisov ali predpisov Skupnosti, vključno s Protokolom o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti ;
(a) to more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties , the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union or any other relevant national or Community provisions , including the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities ;
b) v pravice in obveznosti iz Kadrovskih predpisov poslancev Evropskega parlamenta oziroma uradnikov Evropskih skupnosti .
(b) to rights and obligations conferred by the Statute for Members of the European Parliament or the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities .
Z večjo natančnostjo je treba navesti, kateri so viri širših jamstev, ki se nanašajo na osebe, ki so vpletene v preiskavo.
The possible sources of more extensive guarantees for persons implicated in investigation should be indicated in greater detail.
Generalni direktor Urada lahko odloči, da ne bo poslal obvestila iz prvega pododstavka v primerih, ko je nujno treba ohraniti popolno tajnost in uporabiti preiskovalne ukrepe, ki so v pristojnosti nacionalne sodne oblasti.
The Director‑General of the Office may decide not to make the communication referred to in the first subparagraph in cases requiring the maintenance of absolute secrecy and use of investigative measures that fall under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority.
V primeru notranje preiskave sprejme odločitev sporazumno z institucijo, organom, uradom ali agencijo, kateri pripada zadevna oseba.
In the case of an internal investigation he shall decide in agreement with the institution, body, office or agency to which the person concerned belongs.
Generalni direktor Urada lahko odloči, da ne bo poslal obvestila iz prvega pododstavka v primerih, ko obstaja potreba po zaupnosti preiskave in je treba uporabiti preiskovalne ukrepe, ki so v pristojnosti nacionalne sodne oblasti , vendar samo če je ta odločitev v skladu z mnenjem, ki ga je v ta namen izdal revizijski svetovalec .
The Director‑General of the Office may decide not to make the communication referred to in the first subparagraph in cases where the investigation needs to be conducted on a confidential basis and entailing the use of investigative measures that fall under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority , but only if that decision accords with the opinion delivered by the Review Adviser in that connection .
Treba je pojasniti, da se zadevno obvestilo lahko opusti samo, če je to skladno z mnenjem revizijskega svetovalca, čigar vloga je ta, da spremlja nadzor nad postopkovnimi jamstvi sodelovanja zadevnih strani.
It should be made clear that the communication may be dispensed with only in accordance with the opinion of the Review Adviser, whose role is to ensure compliance with the procedural guarantees applicable to the persons involved in the investigation.
Člen 1 –točka 9
Article 1 – point 9
Člen 10 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
To mnenje se posreduje zadevni državi članici in organu, skupaj s podatki iz pododstavka 1.
Those comments shall be sent to the Member State concerned together with the information referred to in paragraph 1.