natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na podlagi take domneve bi lizbonska pogodba lahko začela veljati na začetku leta 2010.
Under such hypothesis, the Lisbon Treaty could enter into force at the beginning of 2010.
Zadevajo predvsem razdelke 1a (politika vesolja in raziskav, mladina, šport, javno zdravje), 3b (pravosodno sodelovanje) in 4 (človekoljubna pomoč, Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje).
They concern mainly headings 1a (Space and research policy, youth, sport, public health), 3b (judicial cooperation) and 4 (humanitarian aid, European External Action Service).
Za dva razdelka (1a in 4) je bilo že dokazano, da s sedanjim večletnim finančnim okvirom nimata zadostnega financiranja.
Two of these headings (1a and 4) have already proved to be under-financed under the current MFF.
Zaključki in možnosti
Conclusions and options
Poročevalec meni, da so številne negotovosti, povezane s sedanjimi političnimi, gospodarskimi in institucionalnimi okoliščinami, kot so:
The rapporteur considers that a number of uncertainties linked to the current political, economic and institutional context such as
- evropske volitve,
- the European elections;
- imenovanje nove Komisije,
- the nomination of the new Commission;
- pripravljalna stopnja novega irskega referenduma, izid ratifikacijskega postopka,
- the preparatory phase of the new Irish referendum: outcome of the ratification process;
- možen začetek veljave nove pogodbe in proračunske posledice, če ratifikacije ne bo,
- the possible entry into force of the new Treaty and the budgetary consequences of a non-ratification;
- politični vpliv finančne in gospodarske krize ter možne posledice na proračun EU na letni in večletni ravni
- the political impact of the financial and economic crisis and the possible consequences on the EU budget on an annual and multiannual basis;
velik izziv, ki onemogoča sprejetje podrobnih stališč, usmerjenih k ambicioznemu pregledu, v času ko mora biti predloženo samoiniciativno poročilo.
are major challenges which do not allow to take detailed positions aiming at an ambitious review at the time the initiative report has to be presented.
Vendar poročevalec meni, da je ta Parlament vložil ogromno, predvsem z delom začasnega odbora za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva, ter z letnimi proračuni in zakonodajnim delom, ki je temu sledilo.
However, he considers that this Parliament has made a huge investment, notably through the work of its Temporary Committee on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means, as well as the annual budgets and the legislative work which followed.
Zato mora samoiniciativno poročilo odražati tudi dosedanje dosežke in poudariti pomanjkljivosti, ki še vedno obstajajo, kot zapuščina tega Parlamenta naslednjemu.
Therefore, the INI report should also reflect the achievements made so far and highlight the deficits still existing, as a legacy from this Parliament to the next one.
· Možnosti za samoiniciativno poročilo
· Possible options for the INI report
Poročilo bi lahko:
The report could:
- predvidelo vpliv lizbonske pogodbe na politike EU, vključno s količinsko opredeljenimi vidiki, in opredelilo potrebe za ambiciozen pregled v sedanjem večletnem finančnem okviru;
- anticipate the impact of the Lisbon Treaty on EU policies, including quantified aspects and identify the needs for an ambitious review within the current MFF;
- oblikovalo politične zaključke konference o proračunskem pregledu ter omogočilo prihodnje predloge Komisije z iskanjem rešitev za težave, ki jih je treba rešiti v sedanjem finančnem okviru in po njem ;
- draw political conclusions from the Budget Review Conference and pave the way for the Commission proposals to come, finding solutions to problems to be solved within the current MFF and after ;
- na podlagi izkušenj podalo politični pogled, kako bi lahko bil oblikovan naslednji večletni finančni okvir.
- give a political vision of what could be the next MFF, based on the past experience.
- opisalo sedanje politične in institucionalne okoliščine;
- take note of the current political and institutional context;
- predvidelo, da bi predlogi na tej stopnji lahko dosegli nasprotni učinek od zaželenega;
- consider that making proposals at this stage could be counter-productive;
- počakalo, da bo novi Parlament preučil predlog Komisije.
- wait for the Commission proposals to be examined by the new Parliament.
Poročilo bi lahko razvilo pristop s tremi koraki:
The report could develop a three-step approach:
Prvi korak:
1st step:
- opozorilo, da sedanji večletni finančni okvir ni bil tako ambiciozen, kot je morda pričakoval Parlament;
- recall that the current MFF was not as ambitious as the Parliament could have expected;
- opozorilo, da je bila zakonodaji EU omogočena neprekinjenost, saj bo vmesno vrednotenje izvedeno kasneje (2010–2011);
- recall that it has allowed for a continuity of EU legislation whose mid-term assessment will only be made later (2010-2011);
- poudarek, da je pregled iz deklaracije št. 3 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma neprekinjen proces, ker medinstitucionalni sporazum vsebuje potrebne določbe za prilagoditev večletnega finančnega okvira, kadar je ta potrebna (prožnost, pregled, dodatna sredstva) in da so bili ti instrumenti uporabljeni, vedno ko je bilo to potrebno (Galileo, Instrument za hrano, načrt za obnovitev?);
- stress that the review foreseen by the Declaration n° 3 of the IIA is an ongoing process since the IIA contains the necessary provisions to adjust the MFF when necessary (flexibility, revision, top-up) and that these instruments have been activated every time needed (Galileo, Food Facility, Recovery Plan ?)
- navedba nekaterih glavnih načel, ki bi bila lahko uporabljena za delovno osnovo novega Parlamenta, kot:
- indicate some major principles which could be taken over as a working basis by the new Parliament, such as:
- izogibanje pristopa »«božično drevo«;
- avoid the "Christmas tree approach";
- osredotočiti porabo na nekatera glavna področja pod sedanjimi zgornjimi mejami;
- concentrate the spending on a few main areas under the current ceilings;
- uporaba meril evropske dodane vrednosti v skladu z načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti;
- apply the criteria of the European added value, in line with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;
- večje zmožnosti delovanja, predvsem prožnosti znotraj razdelkov in med njimi.
- increase the functioning capacities, notably flexibilities within and across headings.
Lahko bi se uporabile tudi možnosti iz deklaracije št. 1 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (glej spodaj) za zagotovitev večje prožnosti, ki bi omogočila financiranje nekaterih pomembnih političnih prednostnih nalog (energija, širokopasovni dostop).
An option could be to use the possibilities offered by Declaration n° 1 of the IIA (see below) to provide more flexibility to allow the financing of some high political priorities (energy, broadband).
Ta možnost pa bi Evropskemu parlamentu dala priložnost, da prevzame nekatere pobude in predvidi nadaljnje predloge Komisije.
This option would, moreover, give the European Parliament the opportunity to take some initiative and to anticipate further Commission proposals.
»V zvezi s točko 7 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma Komisija pripravi poročilo o delovanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma do konca leta 2009 in mu po potrebi priloži ustrezne predloge.«
"In relation to Point 7 of the Interinstitutional Agreement, the Commission will prepare a report on the functioning of the Interinstitutional Agreement by the end of 2009 accompanied, if necessary, by relevant proposals."
Drugi korak:
2nd step:
- V primeru ratifikacije lizbonske pogodbe se predlagajo prilagoditve, povezane z izzivi in novimi politikami iz pogodbe.
- In case of the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, proposing adjustments linked to the challenges and new policies foreseen by the Treaty
Tretji korak:
3rd step:
- Priprava pogajanj o naslednjemu večletnemu finančnemu okviru (v rokah novega Parlamenta), s sprejetjem okvira iz veljavnih pogodb ter izida vmesnega vrednotenja zakonodajnih programov.
- Prepare the negotiations on the next MFF (in the hands of the new Parliament), taking on board the framework of the existing Treaty as well as the result of the mid-term evaluations of the legislative programmes.
o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira 2007-2013
on the Mid-Term Review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework
4. poudarja svoj namen, da se osredotoči na potrebo po iskanju kratko- in dolgoročnih rešitev za razdelek 4 v okviru imenovanja in potrditve nove Komisije;
Stresses its intention to concentrate on the need to find short- and long-term solutions for Heading 4 in the context of the appointment and the approval of the new Commission;
7. poudarja, da je potrebno preseči razhajanje med osredotočenostjo finančnega instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje na pomoč za razvoj in razvojne cilje tisočletja na eni strani, ter potrebo, na drugi strani, po podpori sodelovanju s tretjimi državami izven obsega uradne razvojne pomoči; zato poziva Komisijo, naj predloži zadevne predloge sprememb sedanje zakonodaje ter v okviru prihodnjega VFO predvidi vir stalnega in ustreznega financiranja za sodelovanje z državami v razvoju, ki so zunaj obsega uradne razvojne pomoči;
Points to the need to close the gap between the current focus of the financing instrument for development cooperation (DCI) on development assistance and the Millennium Development Goals, on the one hand, and the need to support cooperation with third countries outside the ambit of official development assistance (ODA), on the other; therefore calls on the Commission to propose relevant amendments to the current legislation and to envisage, within the next MFF, a resource of permanent and adequate funding for non-ODA cooperation with development countries;
o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira 2007–2013
on Mid-term Review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework
4. opozarja, da se je v postopku demokratičnega nadzora pokazala potreba po novem finančnem instrumentu ali po spremembi obstoječega instrumenta z dodatnimi finančnimi sredstvi, da bi poleg uradne razvojne pomoči v državah, vključenih v instrument za razvojno sodelovanje, zajemal tudi druge ukrepe, vendar je to mogoče ustrezno doseči le s povečanjem zgornje meje postavke 4.
Points out that the process of democratic scrutiny has revealed the need for a new financing instrument, or modification of an existing instrument, with additional financial resources, to cover actions other than Official Development Assistance in countries covered by the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), and that this may only be adequately achieved by an increase in the ceiling of heading 4.
o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira 2007–2013
on the mid-term review of the 2007-2013 financial framework
Odbor za proračunski nadzor poziva Odbor za proračun kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Budgetary Control calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. pozdravlja pojem „dopustno tveganje napake“, ki ga je uvedlo Evropsko računsko sodišče v svojem mnenju št. 2/2004
Welcomes the introduction by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) of the notion of 'tolerable risk of error' in its Opinion No 2/2004
UL C 107, 30.04.2004, str.
OJ C 107, 30.4.2004, p.
1. ; poziva Komisijo, naj proračunskim organom predstavi različne možnosti, ki razlagajo stroške kontrol za različne ravni stopnje napake; meni, da bo treba „dopustno tveganje napake“ razločiti glede na naravo, zapletenost in metode upravljanja programov;
1. ; invites the Commission to present to the budgetary authorities the various options detailing the cost of controls for different levels of error rate; believes that a 'tolerable risk of error' will have to be differentiated according to the nature, complexity and management methods of programmes;
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko poziva Odbor za proračun kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. poudarja, da glavni energetski izzivi EU in podjetniški cilji zniževanja emisij po vsem svetu zahtevajo razvoj dostopnih tehnologij obnovljivih virov energije z nizko vsebnostjo ogljika; v zvezi s tem meni, da je treba v proračunu predvideti zadostna finančna sredstva za doseganje ciljev evropskega strateškega načrta za energetsko tehnologijo; ugotavlja, da se ne ga sme financirati s prerazporejanjem sredstev, namenjenih programom Skupnosti za razvoj in inovacije;
Stresses that the main energy challenges facing the EU as well as the firm objective to cut worldwide emissions necessitate the development of affordable, low-carbon and renewable energy technologies; in this respect believes that the budget should allow for sufficient financial means to reach the goals in the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan; notes that it should not be financed through redeployment of funds made available for Community programmes for research and innovation;
(i) razvoj potrebne omrežne infrastrukture za izkoriščanje potencialov energije priobalnega vetra in morja;
(i) the development of the necessary network infrastructure to develop off-shore wind and marine energy potentials;
(ii) razvoj povezovalnih vodov s sredozemskimi državami, da bi v celoti izrabili velik potencial vetrne in solarne termalne energije na jugu EU in v sosednjih državah;
(ii) the development of interconnectors with Mediterranean countries in order to fully exploit the vast potential of wind and solar thermal electricity potential in southern EU and neighbouring countries;
(iii) uvedbo omrežij daljinskega ogrevanja in hlajenja na podlagi biomase v kombinaciji z obsežnejšim programom za naknadno opremljanje obstoječega stavbnega fonda;
(iii) the take-up of biomass based district heating and cooling networks in combination with a major programme of retrofitting of the existing building stock;
9. meni, da raziskave najvišje znanstvene kakovosti vse bolj zahtevajo naložbe v raziskovalno infrastrukturo; meni, da proračun sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskovalno infrastrukturo v obdobju 2007–2013 ne ustreza ne potrebam ne možnostim evropskih raziskav; je prepričan, da bi moral biti ta sektor pomembna prednostna naloga ob vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira;
Believes that research of the highest scientific quality increasingly requires investment in research infrastructure; takes the view that the seventh framework programme's budget for research infrastructure during the 2007-2013 period matches neither the needs nor potential of European research; believes that this sector must become an important priority ahead of the mid-term review of the financial framework;
12. poudarja, da so energetska učinkovitost in podnebne spremembe temeljne prednostne naloge Evropske unije, vendar pa niso zadostno in jasno razvidne v proračunu EU; meni, da bi bilo to stanje mogoče izboljšati z uvedbo posebne proračunske vrstice ali podpostavke, namenjene naložbam v omilitev podnebnih sprememb in prilagoditev nanje, poleg vključitve ciljev na področju podnebnih sprememb v obstoječe programe;
Points out that energy efficiency and climate change are considered to be key priorities for the EU but are not sufficiently and coherently reflected in the EU budget; considers that the creation of a dedicated budget line or specific sub-headings for investments in climate change mitigation and adaptation would be a possible improvement, in addition to integrating climate change objectives into existing programmes;
14. ugotavlja, da je treba dati prednost učinkovitemu upravljanju porabe sredstev EU; nadalje ugotavlja, da je zlasti pomembno, da dodeljevanje sredstev temelji na objektivnih merilih in stalnem vrednotenju njihove uspešnosti; ocenjuje, da naj se zato spodbuja tesno in uspešno javno-zasebno partnerstvo;
Notes that high priority should be given to an effective management of EU spending; notes further that it is particularly important that allocations of funds are based on objective criteria and on a continuous evaluation of their performance; considers that strong and efficient Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) should be fostered in this respect;
16. poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti finančna sredstva za regulatorja EU, ki skrbi za jedrsko varnost in zaščito ter določa in nadzoruje poenotena pravila, postopke in standarde za ravnanje z jedrskimi snovmi in za posledične nesreče;
Stresses the need for financial resources to be deployed for an EU regulator that deals with nuclear security and safety and establishes and monitors unified rules, processes and standards for the handling of nuclear materials and consequential accidents;
Manuel António dos Santos, Juan Fraile Cantón, Neena Gill, Pierre Pribetich, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Uručev
Manuel António dos Santos, Juan Fraile Cantón, Neena Gill, Pierre Pribetich, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Urutchev
o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira 2007–2013
on the Mid-term Review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework
A. ker ostaja kohezijska politika Unije osnovni steber v procesu evropske integracije in ima dejavno vlogo pri zmanjševanju neenakosti in razvojnih zaostankov;
A. whereas EU cohesion policy remains a crucial pillar in the process of European integration, and plays an active role in reducing inequalities and development deficits;
6. poudarja, da kohezijske politike ni mogoče imeti le za sredstvo uresničevanja ciljev drugih sektorskih politik, temveč gre za samostojno politiko Skupnosti, ki zagotavlja znatno dodano vrednost;
Stresses that cohesion policy must not be seen as merely an instrument for achieving the objectives of other sectoral policies, since it is a Community policy in its own right offering substantial value added;
9. poudarja, da je končni namen financiranja EU izboljšati kakovost življenja državljanov Unije in zato poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo optimalno upravljanje sredstev EU; ob upoštevanju tega opozarja na potrebo po dobrem upravljanju in pomen boja proti goljufijam, korupciji in organiziranemu kriminalu, ki neposredno kršijo načela, na katerih temelji proračun EU; zato pozdravlja prizadevanja urada OLAF s tem v zvezi;
9.Stresses the fact that the ultimate purpose of EU funding is to improve the quality of life of Union citizens and thus calls upon the Member States to ensure optimal management of EU funds; with this in mind, recalls the need for good governance and the importance of combating fraud, corruption and organised crime, which directly violate the principles underpinning the EU budget; therefore welcomes the efforts of OLAF in this regard;
13. poudarja pozitivne učinke novih pobud Jessica, Jaspers in Jeremie, ki jih financirajo Evropska investicijska banka in druge ustanove, ter poziva, da se v naslednjem finančnem okviru te pobude še razširijo;
Emphasises the positive effects of the new initiatives Jessica, Jaspers and Jeremie that are financed by the European Investment Bank and other institutions and calls for the extension of these initiatives in the next financial framework;
o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira 2007–2013
on Mid-term review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework
4. poudarja, da tisti, ki opozarjajo na razmeroma visok delež izdatkov za kmetijstvo v proračunu Unije, zavajajo javnost, saj pomoč za kmetijstvo predstavlja zanemarljivo majhno vsoto glede na celotni BDP držav članic;
Stresses that those who draw attention to the relatively large proportion of the EU budget which is spent on agriculture mislead public opinion, as farm subsidies account for a negligible amount in relation to the total GDP of the Member States;
6. poudarja, da so cene kmetijskih pridelkov v zadnjem času močno nihale, ter ugotavlja, da so se motili tisti, ki so zaradi naglo rastočih cen živil v preteklih letih menili, da pomoč v kmetijstvu ni več potrebna in da lahko že same cene kmetom zagotovijo predvidljiv dohodek;
Stresses that farm prices have fluctuated considerably recently and that those commentators are mistaken who, because of the substantial rise in food prices in recent years consider that there is no longer any need for farm subsidies and that sales of produce are, by themselves, capable of providing farmers with a stable, predictable income;
8. obžaluje zvišane stopnje modulacije, o katerih so se dogovorile države članice med pregledom skupne kmetijske politike, in zahteva, naj Komisija med pregledom finančnega okvira zagotovi dodatna sredstva za razvoj podeželja, da bo mogoče zadostiti potrebam drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike;
Regrets the high modulation rates agreed by the Member States in the 'CAP Health Check' and calls on the Commission, with a view to the revision of the financial framework, to propose an increase with 'fresh' money in the rural development funds in order to cope with the requirements of this second pillar of the CAP;
10. poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej obvesti Parlament o dodatnih sredstvih, ki bodo predvidoma potrebna na področju kmetijstva, če se bodo Hrvaška ali druge države pridružile EU v obdobju do leta 2013 oziroma če bi v smernicah za kmetijstvo predvideli nove izdatke;
Calls on the Commission to inform Parliament as soon as possible about the additional funding which it expects will be needed in the field of agriculture if Croatia or other States were to join the EU before 2013 or if fresh expenditure were envisaged within the agricultural guidelines;
ZDA s kmetijskim zakonom);
Draws attention to the fact that, in recent times, other major participants in world trade in farm products have stepped up their agricultural policies (e.g. the USA with its Farm Bill);
15. poudarja, da ima kmetijska proizvodnja izjemno veliko dodatno vrednost, saj dobavlja surovine za predelovalni sektor in tako prispeva h gospodarski in družbeni povezanosti prostora kot tudi k uravnoteženemu razvoju Evropske unije; opozarja, da je treba pomoč, ki jo dobivajo kmetje, ohraniti in po potrebi povišati, saj spodbuja povečanje kmetijske proizvodnje;
Stresses that the added value of agricultural production is extremely high since it also supplies the processing sector, thereby contributing to economic and social cohesion in the regions and to the EU's balanced development; points out that it is therefore necessary to maintain and where appropriate step up the support received by farmers, since it provides an incentive to increase agricultural production;
18. svari pred nevarnostmi zaradi morebitne uvedbe sofinanciranja prvega stebra, saj njegovega obveznega značaja najverjetneje ne bo mogoče zagotoviti, če kateri od nacionalnih parlamentov ne bo odobril sredstev za nacionalno sofinanciranje, kar bi pomenilo močno izkrivljanje konkurence in dejanski poseg v skupno kmetijsko politiko, kot je navedeno v pismu Evropske komisije z dne 9. junija 2008;
Warns against the threats posed by a possible introduction of co-financing for the first pillar, since its compulsory character can most likely not be guaranteed if one of the national parliaments is unwilling to authorise the funds for national co-financing, resulting in considerable distortion of competition and a de-facto dismantling of the CAP, as mentioned in the letter of the European Commission of 9 June 2008;