natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2. naroči svojemu predsedniku, da ta sklep in poročilo pristojnega odbora Parlamenta nemudoma posreduje pristojnim italijanskim organom.
Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of the committee responsible, immediately to the competent Italian authorities.
Državno tožilstvo v Milanu je v pismu z dne 28. maja 2008, naslovljenem na predsednika Evropskega parlamenta Hansa-Gerta Pötteringa, prosilo za dovoljenje za uporabo „posrednih“ telefonskih pogovorov med preiskovano osebo in nekdanjim evropskim poslancem Massimom D'Alemo v kazenskem postopku.
By letter of 28 May 2008 to Hans-Gert Pöttering, President of the European Parliament, the Public Prosecution Service at the Court of Milan applied for authorisation to use in criminal proceedings 'indirect' telephone conversations between an individual under investigation and the former Member of the European Parliament, Massimo D'Alema .
Gre za primer kazenskega postopka št. 19195/2005 v zvezi s poskusom prevzema banke Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, v okviru katerega sta bila uvedena preiskava in kazenski postopek zoper skupino oseb, osumljenih kršitve italijanske zakonodaje, ki na podlagi členov 185 in 184 uredbe z zakonsko močjo št. 58 iz leta 1998 (enotno besedilo finančne policije) kaznuje kazniva dejanja zlorabe trga in trgovanja na podlagi notranjih informacij.
The criminal proceedings in question (19195/2005) concern the attempted takeover of the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, in connection with which a group of persons suspected of having violated Italian legal provisions laying down penalties for the offences of market manipulation and insider trading, as established in Articles 185 and 184 of Decree Law No 58, 1998 (Consolidated Law on Finance), have been placed under investigation and brought to trial.
V okviru predhodne preiskave so bili v skladu z določbami italijanskega Zakona o kazenskem postopku opravljeni telefonski prisluhi.
During the preliminary investigations, telephone intercepts were carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.
Nekateri posnetki prestreženih telefonskih pogovorov vsebujejo pogovore med preiskovanci in nekaterimi nacionalnimi poslanci, med drugim s poslancem Massimom D'Alemo, ki je bil v zadevnem obdobju poslanec Evropskega parlamenta.
The calls intercepted included conversations between the persons under investigation and a number of Italian members of parliament, including Massimo D'Alema, who was a Member of the European Parliament at the time.
Gre torej za posredne prisluhe poslancem, ki se pogovarjajo s telefonskimi uporabniki, ki se jim redno prisluškuje.
They thus constituted 'indirect' intercepts of conversations between members of parliament and individuals whose calls were being lawfully intercepted.
Člen 4 zakona 140/2003 določa, da mora neposredne prisluhe nacionalnim poslancem predhodno odobriti italijanski parlament.
Article 4 of Italian Law 140/2003 provides that direct intercepts of conversations involving members of the Italian Parliament require prior authorisation by that parliament.
Glede posrednih prisluhov pa v skladu s prvim odstavkom 6. člena zakona 140/2003 preiskovalni sodnik tudi na zahtevo strank ali zadevnega poslanca odredi uničenje teh posnetkov, v kolikor presodi, da so za kazenski postopek nepomembni.
As regards indirect intercepts , Article 6(1) of Law 140/2003 provides that the examining magistrate shall, including on application by the parties or the member of parliament concerned, order their destruction where he or she considers them not to be relevant to the criminal proceedings.
Če pa na zahtevo stranke v postopku sodnik presodi, da je uporaba posnetkov teh prisluhov potrebna in pomembna, zaprosi za dovoljenje zbornico, kateri poslanec pripada ali je pripadal, v skladu z drugim odstavkom istega člena .
Where, however, on application by a party to the proceedings, the magistrate deems their use to be relevant and necessary, he or she must seek authorisation from the House in which the member of parliament sits or sat , as established in Article 6(2) of the above law .
20. julija 2007 je preiskovalna sodnica Clementina Forleo zaprosila poslansko zbornico (za poslance D'Alemo , Fassina, Cicuja) in senat (za senatorja La Torreja in Cominciolija) za dovoljenje za uporabo zadevnih prisluhov.
On 20 July 2007 the examining magistrate, Clementina Forleo, applied to the Chamber of Deputies (in respect of the members D'Alema , Fassino and Cicu) and to the Senate (in respect of senators La Torre and Comincioli) for authorisation to use the aforementioned intercepts.
Oktobra 2007 je poslanska zbornica izjavila, da v primeru poslanca Massima D'Aleme ni pristojna, saj je bil v času prestrezanja telefonskih pogovorov poslanec Evropskega parlamenta.
In October 2007, the Chamber of Deputies stated that it was not competent to deal with the matter relating to Massimo D'Alema in that , when the conversations were intercepted, Mr D'Alema was a Member of the European Parliament .
Na podlagi te odločitve poslanske zbornice se je Državno tožilstvo v Milanu obrnilo na Evropski parlament in zahtevalo dovoljenje za posnetke posrednih prisluhov poslancu Massimu D'Alemi .
Further to that decision of the Chamber of Deputies, the Milan Public Prosecution Service has applied to the European Parliament for authorisation to use the indirect intercepts involving Massimo D'Alema .
PRAVO IN SPLOŠNE UGOTOVITVE GLEDE IMUNITETE POSLANCEV EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE IMMUNITY OF MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
Člena 9 in 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti
Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities (PPI)
Protokoli, priloženi pogodbam, so del primarnega prava Skupnosti in imajo enak pravni status kot pogodbe.
The protocols annexed to the Treaties form part of Community primary law and have the same legal status as the Treaties proper.
Sodba, izrečena v pravdni zadevi, povezani z odgovornostjo uslužbencev Skupnosti glede davka na nepremičnine, jasno določa, da je kršitev določb Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti enakovredna kršitvi obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz pogodb (sodba z dne 24. februarja 1988, Komisija proti Belgiji , zadeva št. 260/86, ECR). določata:
A Court of Justice judgment in a case concerning the liability of Community officials in respect of property tax clearly provides that any violation of the PPI is equivalent to a violation of the obligations deriving from the Treaties (judgment of 24 February 1988, Commission v Belgium, Case 280/86 [1988], ECR 955). read:
Zoper člana Evropskega parlamenta se ne sme začeti preiskava, ne sme biti priprt niti se zoper njega ne sme začeti sodni postopek zaradi mnenja ali glasu, ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti.
Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties .
Kadar je poslanec zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja, sklicevanje na imuniteto ni mogoče in Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu poslancu.
Immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is found in the act of committing an offence and shall not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members .
Postopek v Evropskem parlamentu urejata člena 6 in 7 Poslovnika.
The procedural arrangements within the European Parliament are governed by Rules 6 and 7 of the Rules of Procedure.
Ustrezne odločbe so naslednje:
The relevant provisions are:
Člen 6 - Odvzem imunitete
Rule 6 – Waiver of immunity
Vsaka zahteva za zaščito privilegijev in imunitet, ki jo na predsednika naslovi poslanec ali nekdanji poslanec, se razglasi v Parlamentu in posreduje pristojnemu odboru.
Any request addressed to the President by a Member or a former Member to defend privileges and immunities shall be announced in Parliament and referred to the committee responsible .
Člen 7 - Postopki v zvezi z imuniteto
Rule 7 – Procedures on immunity
Prvi in drugi odstavek 68. člena italijanske ustave določata:
Article 68, first and second paragraph of the Italian Constitution reads:
Poslanci niso odgovorni za izražena mnenja ali izrečene glasove med mandatom.
Members of parliament may not be called to answer for opinions expressed or votes cast in the performance of their duties .
Noben član parlamenta ne more biti brez dovoljenja senata, ki mu pripada, podvržen osebni preiskavi oziroma preiskavi doma, ne more mu biti odvzeta prostost ali kakorkoli odvzeta svoboda gibanja oziroma ne more biti priprt, razen ob izvršitvi pravnomočne obsodbe ali če je zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja, za katerega je obvezen odvzem prostosti.
Members of parliament may not be subjected to searches of their person or premises without prior authori s ation from their House , nor arrested or otherwise deprived of their personal freedom, nor held in detention, except pursuant to a non-appealable judgment or where found in the act of committing a n offence in respect of which arrest is mandatory.
(objavljen v italijanskem Uradnem listu št. 142 z dne 21. junija 2003)
Law No 140 of 20 June 2003 (published in Official Journal No 142 of 21 June 2003)
Kadar je treba pri poslancu Parlamenta opraviti osebno ali hišno preiskavo, osebni pregled, katero koli obliko prisluha pogovorov ali telefonskih pogovorov, zaseg pisanja, ali pridobiti izpise telefonskih pogovorov, ali kadar je treba izvršiti pridržanje, izvajati ukrepe za zagotovitev obdolženčeve navzočnosti, za odpravo ponovitvene nevarnosti in za uspešno zagotovitev kazenskega postopka ter varnostne ukrepe, ali izvršiti prisilno privedbo ali varnostne ali preprečevalne ukrepe osebne narave ter vse druge ukrepe odvzema osebne svobode, pristojni organ zaprosi neposredno za dovoljenje zbornice, ki ji poslanec pripada.
Where it is necessary to subject a member of parliament to searches of their person or premises , inspections, any form of interception of conversations or communications or seizure of correspondence, or to obtain call logs, or where it is necessary to subject the member to arrest or to implementation of preventive coercive measures or injunctions or the enforcement of summonses, security or prevention measures or any other measure involving the deprivation of personal freedom , the competent authority shall apply directly to the House in which the member sits for authorisation to take such action .
Zadovoljenje se ne zaprosi, če je bil poslanec Parlamenta zaloten pri kaznivem dejanju, za katerega je predpisana kazen zapora, ali kadar gre za izvrševanje pravnomočne obsodilne sodbe.
Authorisation shall not be required where the member of parliament is found in the act of committing an offence in respect of which arrest is mandatory, or where a non-appealable judgment is being executed.
Če pride do razpustitve zbornice, ki ji poslanec pripada, postane prošnja za dovoljenje z dnevom začetka naslednjega zakonodajnega obdobja neveljavna in se jo lahko obnovi in predloži pristojni zbornici na začetku zakonodajnega obdobja.
Where the House in which the member sits is dissolved, the application for authorisation shall lapse at the start of the next parliamentary term, and a new application may be made to the House at the start of th e new parliamentary term.
Kadar poleg primerov, predvidenih v 4. členu, preiskovalni sodnik tudi na zahtevo stranke ali zainteresiranega poslanca presodi, da so zapisniki in posnetki pogovorov ali sporočanja, prestreženi v kateri koli obliki med postopki v zvezi s tretjimi osebami, pri katerih so sodelovali poslanci Parlamenta, ali izpisi telefonskih pogovorov, ki so bili pridobljeni v okviru istih postopkov, za namen postopka v celoti ali delno nepomembni, po zaslišanju strank za zaprtimi vrati v skladu z drugim in tretjim odstavkom 269. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku zaradi varovanja zaupnosti odredi njihovo uničenje v celoti oziroma tistih delov, o katerih je presodil, da so nepomembni.
Outside the circumstances referred to in Article 4, where the examining magistrate s, including on application by the parties or the member of parliament concerned, deems irrelevant to the proceedings all or some of transcripts and recordings of conversations or communications intercepted in any form during proceedings concerning third parties in which members of parliament took part, or call logs obtained during the course of those proceeding s, he shall, having heard the parties and in accordance with the principle of confidentiality, decide in camera to have the items deemed irrelevant destroyed in accordance with Article 269(2) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Če na zahtevo stranke v sodnem postopku po zaslišanju drugih strank v skladu z roki in načini iz šestega odstavka 268. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku preiskovalni sodnik presodi, da je nujno uporabiti posnetke prestreženih pogovorov in izpise iz prvega odstavka, odloči z odredbo in v naslednjih desetih dneh zaprosi za dovoljenje zbornice, ki ji poslanec Parlamenta pripada ali je pripadal v času, ko so bili pogovori ali sporočanje prestreženi.
Where, on application by a party to the proceedings, and having heard the other parties within the time limits and in accordance with the procedures provided for in Article 268(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he deems it necessary to use the intercepts or logs referred to in paragraph 1, the examining magistrate s shall issue an order thereon and shall, within a period of ten days, apply for authorisation therefor to the House in which the member of parliament sits or sat when the conversations or communications were intercepted.
Prošnja za dovoljenje se posreduje neposredno zadevni zbornici.
The application for authorisation shall be forwarded directly to the relevant House.
V njej preiskovalni sodnik navede dejstva, zaradi katerih poteka postopek, zakonske določbe, ki so bile domnevno kršene, ter elemente, na katerih temelji zahteva; k temu priloži tudi izvod zapisnikov, posnetkov in izpisov telefonskih pogovorov v celoti.
In that application, the examining magistrate s shall set out the facts giving rise to the proceedings in progress, state which legal provisions are deemed to have been breached, and set out the grounds for the application , enclosing full copies of the transcripts, recordings and call logs.
Če pride do razpustitve zbornice, ki ji poslanec pripada, postane prošnja za dovoljenje z dnevom začetka naslednjega zakonodajnega obdobja neveljavna in se jo lahko obnovi in predloži pristojni zbornici na začetku zakonodajnega obdobja.
Where the House in which the member sits is dissolved, the application for authorisation shall lapse at the start of the next parliamentary term, and a new application may be made to the House at the start of the new parliamentary term.
Če zbornica dovoljenja ne izda, se dokumentacija prisluhov nemudoma uniči, v vsakem primeru pa v petih dneh od sporočila o zavrnitvi.
Where authorisation is denied, the documentation relating to the intercepts shall be destroyed immediately or no more than ten days after the date of notification of the denial of authorisation.
Sodnik mora vse zapisnike, posnetke in izpise telefonskih pogovorov, ki so bili pridobljeni v nasprotju z določbami tega člena, razglasiti za neuporabne v vseh fazah in stopnjah postopka.
All transcripts, recordings and call logs obtained in breach of the provisions of this article shall be declared unusable at all stages and levels in the proceedings.
UTEMELJITEV PREDLAGANEGA SKLEPA
GROUNDS FOR THE PROPOSED DECISION
Glede posrednih telefonskih prisluhov poslancem člen 6(2) italijanskega zakona 140/2003 določa naslednje: „ Če na zahtevo stranke v sodnem postopku po zaslišanju drugih strank v skladu z roki in načini iz šestega odstavka 268. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku preiskovalni sodnik presodi, da je nujno uporabiti posnetke prestreženih pogovorov in izpise iz prvega odstavka, odloči z odredbo in v naslednjih desetih dneh zaprosi za dovoljenje zbornico, ki ji poslanec Parlamenta pripada ali je pripadal v času, ko so bili pogovori ali sporočanje prestreženi. “
With reference to indirect telephone intercepts concerning a member of parliament, Article 6(2) of Italian Law No 140/2003 stipulates that on application by a party to the proceedings, and having heard the other parties within the time limits and in accordance with the procedures provided for in Article 268(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he deems it necessary to use the intercepts or logs referred to in paragraph 1, t he examining magistrates shall issue an order thereon and shall, within a period of ten days, apply for authorisation therefor to the House in which the member of parliament sits or sat when the conversations or communications were intercepted ' .
Opozoriti je treba, da člen 10 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti med drugim določa, da „ med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo: a. na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane članom parlamenta te države.“
Article 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities (PPI) stipulates, inter alia, that 'during the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members shall enjoy: (a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament (...)' .
Glede na te določbe in na dejstvo, da je bil poslanec Massimo D'Alema v času zadevnih dogodkov poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, je Evropski parlament v zadevi pristojen.
On the basis of the above provisions and of the fact that Massimo D'Alema was a Member of the European Parliament when the above events took place, the European Parliament is competent to deal with the matter.
Zato je s tega vidika prošnja milanskega državnega tožilstva brezpredmetna.
Accordingly, in this respect the application made by the Milan Public Prosecution Service is groundless.
Na podlagi prejšnjih premislekov Odbor za pravne zadeve odloči, da ne odobri uporabe zadevnih posnetkov telefonskih prisluhov in da ne odvzame imunitete poslancu Massimu D'Alemi.
On the above basis, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that use of the telephone intercepts in question should not be authorised and that Massimo D'Alema's immunity should not be wa i ved.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o pooblastitvi držav članic, da v interesu Evropske skupnosti ratificirajo Konvencijo o delu na področju ribolova Mednarodne organizacije dela iz leta 2007 (Konvencija 188)
on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Member States to ratify, in the interests of the European Community, the Work in Fishing Convention, 2007, of the International Labour Organisation (Convention 188)
MNENJE Odbora za ribištvo ..........................................................................................8
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ..................................................................8
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2008)0320 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2008)0320 )
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije št. 188 Mednarodne organizacije dela o delu na področju ribolova, ki je bila sprejeta 14. junija 2007
– having regard to Convention No 188 of the International Labour Organisation on work in the fishing sector, adopted on 14 June 2007
ILO, Mednarodna konferenca dela, Začasno poročilo, Šestindevetdeseto zasedanje, Ženeva, 2007, št. 12 in št. 25. ,
ILO, International Labour Conference, Provisional Record, Ninety-sixth Session, Geneva, 2007 No 12 and No 25. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 42 in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 42 and to Article 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0218/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0218/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0423/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0423/2008 ),
Razlogi za predlog in njegovi cilji
Grounds for and objectives of the proposal
Komisija je kot enega od razlogov za predlog navedla potrebo po zagotovitvi izvajanja konvencije št. 188, ki jo morajo države članice ratificirati.
In the section setting out the grounds for the proposal, the Commission refers to the importance of ensuring the implementation of Convention No 188, which requires its ratification by the various member States.
Konvencija št. 188 Mednarodne organizacije dela o delu na področju ribolova (v nadaljevanju konvencija ILO) je bila sprejeta junija 2007 na šestindevetdesetem zasedanju Mednarodne konference dela.
Convention No.188 on work in the fishing sector of the International Labour Organisation (hereinafter called the ILO) was adopted in June 2007 by the ninety-sixth session of the International Labour Conference.
Leta 2003 so začeli urad ILO in tripartitne delegacije (vlade, delodajalci in delavci) pripravljati posodobljene in usklajene mednarodne standarde dela za področje ribolova, ki bi glede na posebno naravo ribiškega sektorja ter delovne in življenjske razmere v njem zagotavljali ustrezno zaščito za ribiče po vsem svetu.
In 2003, the ILO Office and the ILO tripartite constituents (governments, employers, workers) began working in 2003 on an updated and comprehensive international labour standard for the fishing sector that would provide appropriate protection for fishers around the globe, in view of the special nature of the sector and the specific living and working conditions of fishermen, which call for special protection.
Cilj konvencije 188 je vzpostavitev minimalnih mednarodnih standardov v ribiškem sektorju, zato revidira konvencijo o minimalni starosti (ribiči) iz leta 1959 (št. 112), konvencijo o zdravniškem pregledu ribičev iz leta 1959 (št. 113), konvencijo o pogodbi o zaposlitvi ribičev iz leta 1959 (št. 114) in konvencijo o prostorih za posadko na ribiških ladjah iz leta 1966 (št. 126).
Convention 188 is aimed at establishing minimum international standards for the fishing sector.
Zajema tudi druga pomembna vprašanja, kot so zdravje in varnost pri delu, število članov posadke in čas počitka, seznam posadke, vrnitev, zaposlitev in namestitev ter socialna varnost.
Therefore it revises the Minimum Age (Fishermen) Convention, 1959 (No. 112), the Medical Examination (Fishermen) Convention, 1959 (No. 113), the Fishermen's Articles of Agreement Convention, 1959 (No. 114), and the Accommodation of Crews (Fishermen) Convention, 1966 (No. 126); it also covers other important issues such as health and safety at work, manning and hours of rest, crew list, repatriation, recruitment and placement and social security.
H tej konvenciji je priloženo priporočilo 199 o delu na področju ribolova, ki ga je Mednarodna konferenca dela sprejela junija 2007.
Convention 188 is accompanied by Recommendation 199 on work in the fishing sector, which was adopted by the International Labour Conference of June 2007.
Končni cilj konvencije iz leta 2007 je doseči in ohraniti enake pogoje delovanja na področju ribolova s spodbujanjem dostojnih življenjskih in delovnih razmer za ribiče ter pravičnejših pogojev konkurence v svetu ter s tem prispevati k množičnejši ratifikaciji vrste konvencij s področja dela v pomorstvu.
The ultimate aim of the 2007 Convention is to achieve and maintain a level playing field in the fishing sector by fostering the promotion of decent living and working conditions for fishers and fairer conditions of competition in the world and thereby to remedy the low rate of ratification of many conventions in the field of maritime labour.