natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za to poročilo sicer ni bistvenega pomena, ali skupino opredelimo kot manjšino ali kot etnično skupino, saj zakonodaja Evropske unije zagotavlja pravice in varstvo posameznikom na podlagi njihovega pravnega statusa državljanov Evropske unije in ne kot pripadnikov manjšine ali etnične skupine.
However, in view of the aim of this report, it is not so crucial to define a group as a minority or as an ethnic group because the rights and protection of the EU law is conferred upon a person based on his/her legal status as a citizen of the EU and not as a member of a minority or ethnic group.
Zato se poročilo glede tega osredotoči na opredelitev težav, ki jih imajo etnične manjšine in migrantke, in preuči njihov položaj na področju državljanskih pravic, kot je opisano v prvem delu tega delovnega dokumenta: dostop do javnih služb in njihovih storitev, kot so izobraževanje, socialne storitve, zdravstveno varstvo in trg dela, ki močno vplivajo na vključevanje pripadnic etničnih manjšin.
In this regard the report will focus on identify existing problems related to ethnic minorities and female migrants, examining their situation in the sphere of citizen’s rights as outlined in the first part of this working document: access to public services as education, social services, healthcare and to the labour market, which have a great impact on integrating women belonging to ethnic minority.
Pomembno je, da se dilema integracije v Evropski uniji obravnava in se opozori na dejstvo, da biti pripadnica neke etnične skupine v demokratični družbi ni ovira, temveč vse pomembnejša socialno-ekonomska prednost.
It is important to consider the integration dilemma within the European Union and to stress the fact that to be a woman of a particular ethnic group is not a handicap in a democratic society but it plays an increasingly important socio-economic role in the European Union.
Dejanski položaj pripadnic etničnih manjšin je težko preučevati, saj ni dovolj po spolu ločenih statističnih podatkov o družbeni integraciji migrantov in manjšin.
It is difficult to examine the current situation of women belonging to ethnic minorities as gender disaggregated statistics on social integration of migrants and minorities are lacking.
Ženske izkušnje, na primer rasizma in diskriminacije, so pogosto drugačne od moških, saj so ženske in dekleta izpostavljene različnim oblikam diskriminacije, tako na podlagi spola kot etnične pripadnosti.
Women’s experiences of, for example, racism and discrimination often differ from those of men because women and girls may suffer multiple forms of discrimination, both on the grounds of gender and on the basis of ethnic identity.
Zaradi večplastne diskriminacije, ki jo trpijo migrantke in pripadnice manjšin, je treba razviti inovativne načine ozaveščanja o pravicah žensk, pa tudi načine za krepitev vloge žensk in za spodbude ženskam, naj v svojih skupnostih spodbujajo človekove pravice.
The multiple discrimination faced by migrant and minority women makes it necessary to develop innovative ways to raise awareness about women’s rights, to empower women and to inspire them to take on leadership roles in their communities to promote human rights.
Še ena težava pri opredeljevanju skupnih težav v Evropski uniji je velika raznolikost izzivov, s katerimi se soočajo pripadnice manjšin in migrantke v Uniji in ki so posledica posebnosti države članice, kjer živijo, zgodovine migracij v tej državi, veljavne zakonodaje in predpisov, ki urejajo to področje, sposobnosti in pripravljenosti države, da prizna in spoštuje navzočnost manjšin in priseljencev, in odprtosti družbe.
Another difficulty in identifying common problems within the EU is that challenges faced by minority and migrant women in European are very diverse, depending on specificity of the Member State in which the women live, the history of migration in that country, existing legislation and laws governing migration, the ability and willingness of those countries to recognize and respect the presence of minorities and immigrants, and the openness of the society.
Pri obravnavi vloge žensk v integracijskih politikah ne smemo pozabiti vloge moških.
In discussing the role of women in integration policies, the role of men should not be forgotten.
Poročevalka se sprašuje, če za spodbujanje integracije pripadnic manjšin v Evropski uniji ne bi bilo treba obravnavati tudi vloge moških pripadnikov manjšin.
The rapporteur examines if the role of men from ethnic minorities need to be considered in order to promote the integration of women from ethnic minorities in the European Union.
Poročevalka opozori na nekatere pogoje in dejavnike, ki bi lahko družbeno integracijo pripadnic etničnih manjšin ovirali bolj kot integracijo pripadnic večinske družbe.
The rapporteur draws attention to the issue of certain conditions and background factors which could hinder social integration of the women from ethnic minorities more than women belonging to the majority.
To so 1.) izobrazbena stopnja in znanje jezika, 2.) stanovanjski pogoji, 3.) zdravstveno stanje in/ali 4.) enakost pri delu in delovni pogoji.
Those issues are 1) educational level and language knowledge, 2) housing conditions, 3) health condition and/or 4) job quality and working conditions.
Politika Evropske unije za enakost med spoloma mora spodbujati enakost med moškimi in vsemi ženskami, toda ali pripadnice manjšin lahko resnično uživajo koristi teh politik, ker so pač v družbo slabše integrirane?
European Union gender equality policy is meant to promote equality between men and all women, but are women from ethnic minority groups prevented from benefitting from policies because of a lack of social integration?
V poročilu poročevalka preučuje, ali bi bili potrebni posebni, ciljno usmerjeni ukrepi za enakost med spoloma znotraj etničnih manjšin.
In the report the rapporteur examines if there should be specific measures taken to target gender equality among ethnic minorities.
Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Silvia Costa, Edite Estrela, Ilda Figueiredo, Iratxe García Pérez, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Mary Honeyball, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Philippe Juvin, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Barbara Matera, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Frédérique Ries, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Eva-Britt Svensson, Marc Tarabella, Marina Yannakoudakis, Anna Záborská
Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Silvia Costa, Edite Estrela, Ilda Figueiredo, Iratxe García Pérez, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Mary Honeyball, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Philippe Juvin, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Barbara Matera, Antonyia Parvanova, Frédérique Ries, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Eva-Britt Svensson, Marc Tarabella, Marina Yannakoudakis, Anna Záborská
Christa Klaß, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Norica Nicolai, Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli), Joanna Senyszyn
Christa Klaß, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Mariya Nedelcheva, Norica Nicolai, Chrysoula Paliadeli, Joanna Senyszyn
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prostem gibanju delavcev v Uniji (kodificirana različica)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (codified version)
(Redni zakonodajni postopek – kodifikacija)
(Ordinary legislative procedure – codification)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0204 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0204 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 294(2) in 46 Pogodbe o delovanju EU, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7‑0112/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 46 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0112/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne …;
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of …,
UL C 102, 4.4.1996, str.2. ,
OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p.2. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0222/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0222/2010 ),
1. sprejme stališče v prvi obravnavi in podpre predlog Komisije, kakor je bil prilagojen v skladu s priporočili posvetovalne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
V Bruslju, 4 junij 2010
Brussels, 4 June 2010
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prostem gibanju delavcev v Uniji (kodificirana različica)
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (codified version)
KOM(2010)0204 z dne 5. maja 2010 – 2010/0110(COD)
COM(2010)204 of 5 May 2010 – 2010/0110(COD)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem delovnem postopku za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, še posebej s točko 4, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala 12. maja 2010, da bi proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predstavila Komisija.
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 12 May 2010 for the purpose of examining the above proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo 22 uradnih jezikovnih različic, svoje delo pa je opravila na podlagi francoske različice, saj je bila francoščina izvorni jezik delovnega dokumenta. predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki kodificira uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 1612/68 z dne 15. oktobra 1968 o prostem gibanju delavcev v Skupnosti, soglasno ugotovila, da predlog vsebuje le kodifikacijo obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb.
The working party was able to refer to 22 language versions of the proposal and based its proceedings on the French original version of the working document. an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council to codify Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, resulted in the Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, that the proposal was indeed a straightforward codification without substantive changes to the acts to which it related.
ROMERO REQUENAPravni svetovalec
Jurisconsult Director-General
Prosto gibanje delavcev v Uniji - kodificirana različica
Freedom of movement for workers within the Union - codified version
o novinarstvu in novih medijih – oblikovanje javnega prostora v Evropi
on journalism and new media – creating a public sphere in Europe
Poročevalec: Morten Løkkegaard
Rapporteur: Morten Løkkegaard
– ob upoštevanju Naslova II Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Title II of the Treaty on European Union,
– ob upoštevanju členov 11, 41 in 42 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
– having regard to Articles 11, 41 and 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z naslovom „Partnerstvo za komuniciranje o Evropi“, podpisane 22. oktobra 2008
– having regard to the joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission entitled ‘Communicating Europe in Partnership’, signed on 22 October 2008
UL C 13, 20.1.2009, str.
OJ C 13, 20.1.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 2. aprila 2008 z naslovom „Debate Europe – Gradimo na izkušnjah z načrtom D za demokracijo, dialog in debato“ ( KOM(2008)0158 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 2 April 2008 entitled ‘Debate Europe – building on the experience of Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate’ ( COM(2008)0158 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 24. aprila 2008 z naslovom „Komuniciranje o Evropi prek avdiovizualnih medijev“ ( SEC(2008)0506 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 24 April 2008 entitled ‘Communicating Europe through audiovisual media’ ( SEC(2008)0506 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2007 z naslovom „Komuniciranje o Evropi prek interneta – vključevanje državljanov“ ( SEC(2007)1742 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 21 December 2007 entitled ‘Communicating about Europe via the Internet – Engaging the citizens’ ( SEC(2007)1742 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 3. oktobra 2007 z naslovom „Predlog za medinstitucionalni sporazum Partnerstvo za komuniciranje o Evropi“ ( KOM(2007)0569 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document of 3 October 2007 entitled ‘Proposal for an Inter-Institutional Agreement on Communicating Europe in Partnership’ ( COM(2007)0569 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1904/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o uvedbi programa Evropa za državljane za spodbujanje aktivnega evropskega državljanstva za obdobje 2007–2013
– having regard to Decision No 1904/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 establishing for the period 2007 to 2013 the programme Europe for Citizens to promote active European citizenship
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 1. februarja 2006 z naslovom „Bela knjiga o evropski komunikacijski politiki“ ( KOM(2006)0035 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 1 February 2006 entitled ‘White Paper on a European Communication Policy’ ( COM(2006)0035 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. novembra 2006 o beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki
– having regard to its resolution of 16 November 2006 on the White Paper on a European communication policy
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 13. oktobra 2005 z naslovom „Prispevek Komisije k obdobju razmisleka in za vnaprej: Načrt D za demokracijo, dialog in debato“ ( KOM(2005)0494 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 13 October 2005 entitled ‘The Commission’s contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan-D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate’ ( COM(2005)0494 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A7–0223/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A7‑0223/2010 ),
A. ker sta dostop državljanov do informacij in komuniciranje med oblikovalci politik in volivci osrednja elementa naših predstavniških demokratičnih družb in temeljni pogoj za izvajanje pravice javnosti do celostne in ozaveščene demokratične udeležbe v javnem življenju na nacionalni ravni in ravni EU,
A. whereas access to information for citizens and communication between policy-makers and voters are central elements of our representative democratic societies and a fundamental prerequisite for the exercise of the public’s right to full and informed democratic participation in national and EU public life,
B. ker imajo državljani pravico, da so informirani o EU in njenih konkretnih projektih, da izrazijo svoje poglede na EU in da se jim prisluhne; ker je izziv komunikacije ravno v omogočanju tega dialoga,
B. whereas the public have a right to be informed about the EU and its specific projects, to express their views on the EU and to be listened to; whereas for communicators the challenge lies specifically in facilitating that dialogue,
C. ker se na zadnjih evropskih volitvah trend upadanja volilne udeležbe ni obrnil, kar kaže na potrebo po nadaljnjih prizadevanjih za zmanjšanje razkoraka med EU in njenimi državljani,
C. whereas the last European elections did not reverse the trend of declining voter turnout, highlighting the need to continue efforts to overcome the distance between the EU and its citizens,
D. ker je jasno dokazano, da so državljani premalo seznanjeni s politiko in vprašanji EU in da hkrati želijo biti bolje obveščeni, kar so pokazale tudi različne Eurobarometrove ankete; ker izsledki teh anket kažejo, da je pomanjkanje informacij eden izmed glavnih razlogov za volilno neudeležbo in nezaupanje državljanov v institucije EU,
D. whereas there is clear evidence of citizens being under-informed on EU policies and issues and, at the same time, wishing to be better informed, as reflected in the results of various Eurobarometer polls; whereas those polls indicate that this lack of information is one of the main reasons for people deciding not to vote and being reluctant to trust the EU institutions,
E. ker je Lizbonska pogodba Parlamentu podelila večjo moč pri odločanju v EU, zaradi česar je še pomembneje, da se državljani EU zavedajo dela svojih izvoljenih predstavnikov,
E. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon has given Parliament more power in the context of EU decision-making, making it even more important for EU citizens to be aware of their elected representatives’ work,
F. ker Lizbonska pogodba uvaja novo obliko sodelovanja javnosti pri oblikovanju politik EU – pobudo evropskih državljanov; ker je za uspeh pobude evropskih državljanov bistveno, da ima javnost dostop do informacij in jih kritično dojema,
F. whereas the Lisbon Treaty introduces a new form of public involvement in the shaping of EU policies, the European citizens’ initiative; whereas public access to, and critical understanding of, information are of key importance to the success of the European citizens’ initiative,
G. ker lahko javni prostor razumemo kot okolje, kjer lahko vsi državljani EU in vse najrazličnejše skupine prebivalstva bolje razumejo javne politike in kjer se o teh politikah z njimi lahko razpravlja, da bi bolje izpolnili njihova pričakovanja, in ker mora biti javni prostor okolje za obveščanje, širša posvetovanja, ki presegajo meje držav, ter spodbujati oblikovanje zavesti o skupnem javnem interesu v vsej EU,
G. whereas a public sphere can be understood as a space in which public policies may be better understood by, and discussed with, all EU citizens and all sections of the population, in all its diversity, with a view to meeting their expectations more effectively, and whereas it must be a venue both for the provision of information and for wide-ranging consultations transcending national borders and fostering the development of a sense of shared public interest throughout the EU,
H. ker se izraz „novi mediji“ uporablja za opis omrežene digitalne informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije; ker te nove tehnologije pospešujejo širjenje informacij in raznolikost prispevkov ter prispevajo k bolj posvetovalni demokraciji; ker elektronski družbeni mediji ustvarjajo nove vrste javnosti, ki so fizično razpršene, vendar jih povezuje skupni interes za isto temo z možnostjo ustvarjanja novih nadnacionalnih javnih prostorov,
H. whereas the term ‘new media’ is used to describe networked digital information and communication technologies; whereas those new technologies foster the dissemination of information and diversity of input and make for a more deliberative democracy; whereas electronic social media create new forms of public, which are physically dispersed but bound by a shared interest in the same topic, with the potential to create new transnational public spheres,
I. ker se je med evropsko predvolilno kampanjo leta 2009 z uporabo družbenih medijskih platform v Parlamentu uspešno povečalo število aktivnih uporabnikov, zlasti med mladimi,
I. whereas the use of social media platforms by Parliament in the 2009 European election campaign successfully increased the number of active users, especially among young people,
J. ker se je spremenil način, kako mladi dojemajo, uporabljajo in izkoriščajo medije; ker mladi množično uporabljajo nove tehnologije kot sredstvo za komunikacijo,
J. whereas there has been a change in the way young people perceive, use and exploit the media; whereas young people make wide-ranging use of the new technologies as a means of communication,
K. ker je oblikovanje evropskega javnega prostora tesno povezano z obstojem vseevropskih ali nadnacionalnih medijskih struktur; ker za zdaj ni nadrejenega evropskega javnega prostora, obstajajo pa zelo živahni nacionalni javni prostori, med katerimi je treba razviti sinergijo, npr. po vzoru francosko-nemškega televizijskega programa Arte,
K. whereas the creation of a European public sphere is closely related to the existence of pan-European or transnational media structures; whereas there is no overarching European public sphere at present, but whereas there are very lively national public spheres between which synergies should be developed, along the lines of, for example, the Franco-German television channel Arte,
L. ker v skladu s protokolom k Amsterdamski pogodbi o sistemu javne radiotelevizije v državah članicah
L. whereas, pursuant to the Protocol to the Treaty of Amsterdam on the system of public broadcasting in the Member States
109. države članice pristojne za opredelitev in oblikovanje nalog javnih radiotelevizij,
109. , it is up to the Member States to define and organise the remit of public service broadcasting organisations,
M. ker se pravni predpisi o medijskem trgu med posameznimi državami članicami zelo razlikujejo, jih je pa treba spoštovati,
M. whereas legal regulations governing the media market differ widely among individual Member States, and need to be respected,
N. ker imajo nacionalni mediji, zlasti javne radiotelevizijske ustanove posebno odgovornost, da državljane obširno seznanjajo s političnim odločanjem in vodenjem, kar bi se moralo razširiti na zadeve EU,
N. whereas national media, and in particular public service broadcasters, have a special responsibility to inform the public extensively about political decision-making and governance, which should extend to EU affairs,
O. ker je za boljše poznavanje EU med ljudmi nujno, da se učenje o EU vključi v učne načrte,
O. whereas improving people’s knowledge of the EU requires EU studies to be incorporated into the school curricula,
P. ker je novinarstvo pomembno merilo demokracije in mora zagotavljati prost dostop do različnih mnenj; ker imajo novinarji in mediji vodilno vlogo v procesu evropskega združevanja,
P. whereas journalism is an important gauge of democracy and should guarantee free access to a wide range of views; whereas journalists and the media play a leading role in the European integration process,
Q. ker mora Evropska unija v prizadevanju za legitimnost pred državljani držav članic spodbujati nastanek nadnacionalnih medijev, ki lahko Evropi dajo novo demokratično in neodvisno razsežnost, pri čemer je treba okrepiti pravila za zagotavljanje pluralizma in boj proti koncentraciji medijskega lastništva,
Q. whereas, in its search for public legitimacy in the Member States, the EU should foster the establishment of transnational media that can give Europe a new democratic and independent dimension, while tightening up the rules intended to safeguard pluralism and combat concentration of media ownership,
2. odobrava skupno izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z naslovom „Partnerstvo za komuniciranje o Evropi“ in poziva institucije EU, da jo spoštujejo in podpirajo;
Welcomes the joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission entitled ‘Communicating Europe in Partnership’, and urges the EU institutions to respect and uphold this declaration;
7. poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi svojo komunikacijsko politiko in jo uvrsti med najpomembnejše prednostne naloge pri pogajanjih o večletnem finančnem okviru po letu 2013;
Calls on the Commission to strengthen its communication policy and put it high on the list of priorities when the renegotiation of the post-2013 multiannual financial framework is due to start;