natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Proizvajalci električne energije, ki imajo najboljši pregled nad stroški in prednostmi posameznih virov energije, lahko sami izberejo vir energije pri gradnji novih zmogljivosti.
Which source of fuel is chosen when building new capacity must, however, be left up to the electricity producers, who have the best overview of the costs and advantages of the various energy sources.
Prizadevanja za varstvo podnebja zaradi varnosti oskrbe ne smejo povzročiti zapostavljanja določenega vira energije.
For reasons of security of supply, efforts to combat climate change must not lead to any one energy source being put at a disadvantage.
To velja zlasti za premog, čigar svetovne rezerve zdaj zadostujejo še za najmanj 200 let.
This is particularly true of coal, worldwide reserves of which are sufficient for at least another 200 years.
Premog je namreč najbolj razširjeno fosilno gorivo na svetu.
Coal is thus the globally most widespread fossil fuel.
26 % vseh rezerv je v ZDA, dodatnih 23 % pa je na območju nekdanje Sovjetske zveze.
26% of these reserves are in the USA, another 23% on the territory of the former Soviet Union.
V EU imata Nemčija (7 %) in Poljska (2 %) znatni delež svetovnih rezerv.
Within the EU, Germany (7%) and Poland (2%) possess a significant proportion of global reserves.
Pomembno je, da je večina rezerv v politično stabilnih državah, zato je v nasprotju z nafto in plinom možnost nestabilnih cen zelo majhna.
The crucial factor is that most of these reserves are to be found in politically stable countries and that, unlike oil and gas, the price volatility of coal is extremely low.
Prav zaradi tega je premog nujno potrebno fosilno gorivo v EU.
This in particular makes coal an indispensable fossil fuel for the EU.
Tudi glede tehnologije se premog ne sme zapostavljati.
For technological reasons, too, coal should not be neglected.
Le če se bo premog v EU še naprej uporabljal za proizvodnjo energije, lahko evropska podjetja dosežejo tehnološki napredek in tehnologije izvozijo v države v vzponu, kot sta Kitajska in Indija, ki imata tudi sami dovolj rezerv premoga.
Only if it continues to be used for power production within the EU will it be possible for European businesses to make technological advances in this area and export them to emerging countries such as China and India, which also have large coal reserves.
To v EU zagotavlja delovna mesta in pomembno prispeva k svetovnemu varstvu podnebja.
This will secure jobs in the EU and will at the same time make a significant contribution to protecting the world’s environment.
Uspeh evropskih podjetij je viden pri tem, da so se emisije CO 2 pri proizvodnji električne energije kljub očitnemu povečanju povpraševanja po električni energiji od leta 1990 le zmerno povečale.
The degree of success achieved by European firms in this respect can be seen from the fact that, in spite of a significant increase in demand for electricity since 1990, there has been only a moderate increase in CO2 emissions from power production.
Kljub temu se je znatno povečal delež evropskih emisij CO 2 v prometu.
Conversely, the proportionate contribution of transport to European CO2 emissions has risen considerably.
Prizadevanja za zmanjšanje izpusta CO 2 morajo tako zajeti vse vire energije.
Efforts to reduce CO2 emissions must thus apply to all sources of energy.
Pri sekvestraciji CO 2 , ki se načeloma pozdravlja, je treba upoštevati, da bo ta tehnologija pri termoelektrarnah na premog zagotovo povzročila zmanjšanje učinkovitosti za 14 %.
In the case of CO2 sequestration, which is a welcome development in principle, it needs to be remembered that this technology inevitably leads to a 14% loss of efficiency in coal-fired power stations.
To vpliva tudi na prihodnjo varnost oskrbe s fosilnimi viri energije, v ospredje pa postavlja tudi okoljska vprašanja.
This has an impact on future security of supply of fossil fuels and also raises environmental problems.
Poleg tega je treba dokončno pojasniti tehnična in pravna vprašanja o sproščanju in shranjevanju CO 2 .
Furthermore, there are still technical and legal issues to be clarified in relation to CO2 capture and storage.
Vloga jedrske energije
The role of nuclear energy
Jedrske elektrarne z deležem 31 % pri proizvodnji energije v EU pomembno prispevajo k osnovni oskrbi.
With a share of 31% of power production in the EU, nuclear power plants supply a significant proportion of the base load.
Poleg njihovega osrednjega prispevka k varnosti oskrbe, ki izkazuje njihovo konkurenčnost, veliko prispevajo k varstvu okolja.
In addition to their crucial contribution to security of supply, which proves their competitiveness, they also provide an important benefit to the environment.
Gradnji pete jedrske elektrarne na Finskem je povzročila zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 za 15 %.
Thus the building of a fifth nuclear power plant in Finland engenders a 15% reduction in the country’s CO2 emissions.
Samo v Nemčiji prispevajo obstoječe jedrske elektrarne k zmanjšanju 160 milijonov ton emisij CO 2 , v svetovnem merilu to pomeni celo 700 milijonov ton.
In Germany alone, the existing nuclear power plants account for a saving of 160 million tonnes of CO2 emissions; globally, the saving is 700 million tonnes.
Evropski svet je 8. in 9. marca upravičeno ugotovil, da jedrska energija že pomembno prispeva k varnosti oskrbe in zmanjšanju emisij CO 2 .
On 8-9 March 2007 the European Council correctly noted that nuclear energy makes an important contribution to security of supply and helps the reduction of CO2 emissions.
Povezava med visokim deležem jedrske energije in nizkimi emisijami CO 2 na področju energetike je poudarjena tudi v zadnjem poročilu Mednarodne agencije za energijo za leto 2006.
The link between a high proportion of nuclear energy and low CO2 emissions in the energy economy is also stressed by the IEA in its most recent report for 2006.
Tako so emisije CO 2 v Nemčiji, ki ima 17 jedrskih elektrarn, okoli šestkrat večje od emisij CO 2 v Franciji, ki ima 59 delujočih reaktorjev.
For example, CO2 emissions in Germany, with its 17 nuclear power plants, are some six times higher than in France, where 59 nuclear reactors are in operation.
Okoli 50 zdaj načrtovanih jedrskih elektrarn ali jedrskih elektrarn v gradnji bo tako dodatno prispevalo k varstvu podnebja in varnosti oskrbe.
The 50 nuclear power plants which are currently planned or being built worldwide will thus make a further important contribution to combatting climate change and to security of supply.
To dejstvo so poudarili tudi mednarodni strokovnjaki za podnebje v zadnjem poročilu Medvladnega foruma o podnebnih spremembah.
This is also stressed by international climatologists in the most recent IPCC report on climate change.
Ta prispevek bo še večji, ker je najnovejša generacija elektrarn učinkovitejša, obratovalni stroški nižji, okoljska bilanca pa se povečuje.
This contribution will be all the greater since the latest generation of nuclear power plants are more efficient, thus cutting operating costs and boosting environmental performance.
Poleg tega so največje rezerve urana v politično stabilnih državah, kot sta Avstralija in Kanada.
Furthermore, the largest uranium reserves are to be found in politically stable countries such as Australia and Canada.
Visoka raven recikliranja goriva sodobnih elektrarnah bistveno prispeva k varnosti oskrbe, zlasti ker bi se lahko obdobje, v katerem bi rezerve urana pošle (zadostujejo za več generacij), z uporabo najnovejših generacij elektrarn znatno podaljšalo.
The high level of fuel recycling in modern power stations also significantly contributes to security of supply, particularly since uranium reserves, which will suffice for several generations, can be significantly stretched by the deployment of the latest generation of nuclear power plants.
Poleg tega ta visoka kvota recikliranja prispeva k preprečevanju nastanka visokoradioaktivnih odpadkov.
At the same time this high level of recycling helps the avoidance of high-level radioactive waste.
Poudariti je treba, da je vprašanje končnega odlaganja radioaktivnih odpadkov mogoče rešiti.
It should be stressed that the issue of the final disposal of radioactive waste can be resolved.
Pogosto je končno odlaganje ovirano zaradi političnih in ne znanstvenih vzrokov.
Final disposal is often blocked not for scientific but for political reasons.
Komisija in države članice morajo v zvezi s tem končno predložiti in sprejeti jasen načrt končnega odlaganja.
In this connection the Commission and the Member States should finally submit and adopt a clear-cut overall plan for final disposal.
Zviševanje cen urana v nasprotju z zviševanjem cen nafte in zemeljskega plina prav tako ne povzroča skrbi, ker obratovalni stroški jedrske elektrarne znašajo le 5 % skupnih stroškov.
Neither should the rise in uranium prices give any cause for concern, unlike rises in the price of oil and gas, since the operating costs of a nuclear power station account for only 5% of its total costs.
Tako je zagotovljena popolna neodvisnost od nihanja cen.
This guarantees a large degree of independence from price fluctuations.
Poleg tega je proizvodnja električne energije iz jedrske energije že danes znatno ugodnejša od proizvodnje električne energije iz fosilnih goriv in obnovljivih virov energije.
At the same time, it already costs significantly less to produce electricity from nuclear power than from fossil fuels and renewables.
Tako so sodobne jedrske elektrarne konkurenčne že pri ceni nafte od 40 do 45 dolarjev na sod oziroma 4,7 do 5,7 dolarja na MBTU zemeljskega plina.
Consequently modern nuclear power plants can compete with oil from a price of USD 40 to 45 per barrel and with gas from a price of USD 5.70 per MBtu.
K varstvu okolja in varnosti oskrbe bi lahko dodatno prispevala tudi jedrska fuzija.
Nuclear fusion could make a further contribution to the environment and to security of supply.
Postavitev mednarodnih termonuklearnih poskusnih reaktorjev ob ključnem sodelovanju EU je pomemben korak za prihodnjo varnost oskrbe z energijo.
The creation of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, in which the EU is a controlling participant, is an important step towards securing future energy supplies.
V proračunu EU za leto 2007 je za raziskovanje fuzije že namenjenih 6 % raziskovalnih sredstev.
In the EU's 2007 budget, 6% of the research allocations are already set aside for fusion research.
V okviru energetskega proračuna EU se tako 27 % sredstev uporablja za jedrsko energijo, največji del pa tradicionalno za jedrsko varnost.
In addition, in the context of the EU’s energy budget, 27% of appropriations are spent on nuclear energy, most of it traditionally on nuclear safety.
Ustrezno visoki so varnostni standardi evropskih jedrskih elektrarn.
The safety standards of European nuclear power plants are correspondingly high.
Zaradi svetovnega preporoda jedrske energije mora EU poskrbeti, da se bodo tudi po svetu uporabljali strogi evropski varnostni standardi.
In view of the worldwide resurgence of nuclear energy, the EU must ensure that the strict European safety standards are also applied globally.
Tako lahko EU bistveno prispeva h globalni varnosti oskrbe in varstvu podnebja po svetu.
In this way the EU can make a significant contribution to global security of supply and environmental protection.
Poleg tega se vzpostavlja pomemben trg za evropsko vrhunsko tehnologijo, kar zagotavlja delovna mesta v EU.
This will also create an important market for European high technology, which will secure jobs in the EU.
Odbor za regionalni razvoj poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. ugotavlja, da je povečan dostop do trajnostne energije bistven za uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja v državah v razvoju.
Notes that increased access to sustainable energy is key to developing countries achieving their Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
Po sedanjih ocenah ima dve milijardi ljudi omejen dostop do energije ter zaradi tega manjše možnosti za gospodarski razvoj in izboljšanje življenjskega standarda;
It is estimated that 2 billion people currently suffer from energy constraints that limit their opportunities for economic development and improved standards of living;
6. poziva k nadaljnjim izboljšavam mehanizma čistega razvoja iz kjotskega protokola, da bi mogel izpolniti svoj namen kot možnost za prenos učinkovite, čiste in ustrezne energetske tehnologije v države v razvoju;
Calls for further improvements to be made to the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) so that it can fulfil its purpose as an opportunity to transfer efficient, clean and appropriate energy technologies to developing countries;
9. vendar meni, da so v prehodnem obdobju za zadovoljevanje upravičenih potreb držav v razvoju nujna tudi fosilna goriva, in poziva k ukrepom za boljšo trajnostno rabo lokalnih virov na najbolj energetsko učinkovit način; ugotavlja, da biogoriva ogrožajo biološko raznolikost in varnost preskrbe s hrano v državah v razvoju;
Considers, however, that fossil fuels for a transitional period are also needed in order to meet the legitimate demands of developing countries, and calls for measures to improve the sustainable use of local resources in the most energy-efficient manner; notes the threat that agro fuels constitute for biodiversity and food security in developing countries;
12. podpira spodbujanje projektov in tehnologij, ki izboljšujejo energetsko učinkovitost in varnost v državah v razvoju ter so prilagojeni zlasti potrebam in pogojem v teh državah, kot je izobraževanje ljudi, kako proizvajati energetsko učinkovite peči, kar lahko pripomore k ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest ter preprečuje nadaljnje suše in podnebne spremembe kot tudi izboljšuje zdravje.
Supports the promotion of projects and technologies that improve energy efficiency and energy security in developing countries and that are adjusted specifically to the needs and conditions in those countries, such as teaching people how to produce their own energy-efficient stoves, which can help both to create employment and to combat further desertification and climate change and improve health.
Konvencionalni viri energije in energetske tehnologije
Conventional energy sources and energy technology
Nadomeščeni pripravljalec(-ka) mnenja
Previous drafts(wo)man
o konvencionalnih virih energije in energetski tehnologiji
on conventional energy sources and energy technology
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
6. je seznanjen z izsledki študije Mednarodne agencije za energijo iz leta 2005, ki kažejo na to, da bi lahko bilo širjenje nekaterih tehnologij v države, ki niso članice OVSE, stroškovno učinkovitejše in še posebej pomembno tam, kjer obstajajo večje razlike v geološki sestavi in naravnih virih teh držav; meni, da bi v takšnem primeru države lahko razmislile o finančni podpori državam v razvoju in jim tako pomagale doseči nacionalne cilje, povezane z uporabo omenjenih tehnologij; poudarja, da bi možnost čezmejnega trgovanja z instrumenti uporabe izboljšala učinkovitost in zagotovila, da bi uporaba potekala tam, kjer je to stroškovno najbolj učinkovito;
Notes the findings of a 2005 International Energy Agency (IEA) study which identified that deployment of some technologies within non-OECD countries could prove much more cost-effective and could be particularly significant where there are major differences between countries' geology and natural resources; considers that, where this is the case, countries could consider including financial support for developing countries to help them meet national deployment targets; stresses that the ability to trade deployment instruments across borders would therefore improve efficiency, ensuring that deployment takes place where it is most cost-effective;
8. poziva Komisijo, naj podpre napore Svetovne banke in regionalnih razvojnih bank za vzpostavitev takšnega okvira za naložbe v energijo, ki bo obravnaval stroške, tveganje ter institucionalne in informacijske ovire za povečanje števila javno-zasebnih partnerstev, ki podpirajo tehnologije brez oziroma z nizko vsebnostjo ogljika; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni različne mehanizme, ki naj bi omogočali sodelovanje pri raziskavah in razvoju ter druge cilje prenosa energije, kot so azijsko-pacifiško partnerstvo za čisti razvoj in vodstveni forum za sekvestracijo ogljika; poziva Komisijo, naj razvije merila ocenjevanja za mednarodno financiranje, izmenjavo informacij, mehanizme raziskav in razvoja, in sicer na podlagi njihove zmožnosti prispevati k dolgoročnemu tehnološkemu razvoju brez ali z nizkimi emisijami ogljika;
Calls on the Commission to support the World Bank's and the Regional Development Banks' efforts to create an energy investment framework, addressing cost, risk and the institutional and information barriers to scaling up public-private-partnerships supporting low carbon and carbon free technology; calls on the Commission to evaluate the various mechanisms designed to facilitate research and development collaboration and other technology transfer objectives, such as the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate and the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF); calls on the Commission to develop assessment criteria for international financing, information sharing, research and development mechanisms, based on their ability to contribute to long-term, low-carbon and carbon free technological development;
Konvencionalni viri energije in energetski tehnologiji
Conventional energy sources and energy technology
o konvencionalnih virih energije in energetskih tehnologijah
on conventional energy sources and energy technology
2. poudarja, da so potrebni ukrepi za varnost in raznovrstnost dobave energije za Evropo, in hkrati poudarja, da bi morali biti takšni ukrepi v celoti usklajeni s strategijo trajnostnega razvoja in cilji politike podnebnih sprememb;
Stresses that action is needed concerning the security and diversification of energy supply for Europe and, at the same time, underlines that such action should be fully in line with the sustainable development strategy and climate change policy objectives;
5. v zvezi s pregledom sistema trgovanja z emisijami v EU priporoča javno dražbo za začetno dodelitev kvot za sektor proizvodnje električne energije, da se zunanji stroški emisij CO2 bolje vračunajo in oblikujejo odločnejše spodbude za naložbe v bolj učinkovito proizvodnjo električne energije;
Recommends, for the review of the EU emissions trading scheme, full auction of initial allocations to the electricity generation sector in order to better internalise the external cost of CO 2 emissions and to establish stronger incentives for investments in more efficient electricity production;
7. poudarja, da mora bistveno zmanjševanje emisij toplogrednih plinov ostati temelj politike EU v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami, kot je bilo poudarjeno v sklepih Evropskega sveta marca 2007, ker se bo tehnologije čistega premoga v industriji uporabljalo vsaj še desetletje;
Underlines that, as the industrial application of "clean coal" technologies will take at least another decade, substantial reduction of greenhouse gas emissions must remain a cornerstone of the EU's climate change policy, as outlined by the Conclusions of the March 2007 European Council;
21. poziva Komisijo, naj natančno razišče možne ukrepe, s katerimi bi dosegli predstavitev trajnostne rabe fosilnih goriv, zlasti tehnologij za zgorevanje premoga z nizkimi emisijami ogljika;
Calls on the Commission to intensively examine possible measures for achieving the demonstration of Sustainable Fossil Fuels, and particularly technologies for coal combustion with low carbon emissions;
3. poudarja poseben strateški pomen premoga in jedrske energije (ki predstavljata 29 odstotkov oziroma 31 odstotkov proizvodnje energije v EU) v sedanji in prihodnji evropski mešanici energetskih virov; opaža zelo visoko raven odvisnosti od uvoza energije iz regij izven Skupnosti, ki imajo težave na področju varnosti;
Stresses the particular strategic importance of coal and nuclear energy (accounting, respectively, for 29 % and 31 % of electricity production in the EU) in the present and future European energy mix; notes the extremely high level of dependency on energy imports from regions with problematic security situations outside the Community;
5. poziva države članice ter regionalne in lokalne organe k diverzifikaciji in decentralizaciji proizvodnje energije z uporabo najustreznejših virov v različnih regijah celotne EU in z upoštevanjem posebnih regionalnih značilnosti;
Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to diversify and decentralise energy generation using the most appropriate resources in the various regions throughout the EU and taking account of specific regional characteristics;
Sprejeta besedila , P6(2006)0603. , ki določa cilj, da mora do leta 2020 25 odstotkov porabe energije izhajati iz obnovljivih virov, ter poziva države članice, naj pri izdelavi in izvajanju nacionalnih načrtov za uresničitev tega ambicioznega cilja tesno sodelujejo z lokalnimi in regionalnimi organi;
Texts Adopted , P6(2006)0603. , which sets a target of 25 % of energy consumption to come from renewable sources by 2020 and calls on the Member States to work in close collaboration with regional and local authorities in drawing up and implementing national plans serving to meet that ambitious target;
10. ugotavlja, da ima proizvodnja energije iz biomase kot del energetske mešanice EU znaten potencial in bi lahko tudi prispevala k ustvarjanju številnih delovnih mest na podeželskih območjih; opozarja Komisijo in države članice, da se pri proizvodnji energije iz biomase kot tudi iz fosilnih goriv sproščajo znatne količine CO 2 in da bi morale države članice, kjer je to mogoče, uporabljati tudi tehnologijo zajemanja ogljika; meni, da bi morali vsako obsežno proizvodnjo biomase izvajati na trajnosten način brez škodovanja okolju znotraj EU ali v tretjih državah;
Notes that energy generation from biomass as part of the EU's energy mix has significant potential and could, moreover, help to create many jobs in rural areas; reminds the Commission and the Member States that producing energy from biomass, as well as from fossil fuels, releases significant amounts of CO 2 and that the Member States should also utilise carbon capture technology where possible; notes that any extensive production of biomass should be carried out in a sustainable manner without causing harm to the environment either within the EU or in third countries;
19. ugotavlja, da bo tretjina termoelektrarn na premog v Evropski uniji zaključila svoje obratovanje, še preden bodo tehnologije „trajnostne rabe fosilnih goriv” ekonomsko upravičene, in poziva k prehodnim rešitvam v obliki okoljske zakonodaje in finančnih ukrepov, skladnih z okoljskimi in gospodarskimi zahtevami;
Notes that one third of the coal-fired power plants in the EU will reach the end of their useful life before ‘sustainable coal’ technologies become commercially viable and calls for transitional solutions in the form of environmental legislation and financial measures which are compatible with environmental and economic requirements;
22. poudarja pomen obveščanja prebivalcev področij s termoelektrarnami na premog o obstoječih nevarnostih in izpostavlja pomen objave načrtov za posodobitev obstoječih elektrarn in izboljšanje njihovega vpliva na okolje;
Stresses the importance of informing the inhabitants of areas with coal-fired plants of their inherent dangers and points out the value of publishing plans to modernise existing power plants and improve their environmental impact;
o zmogljivosti, učinkovitosti in varnosti letališč v Evropi: učinkovitejši politiki naproti
on Airport capacity and ground handling: towards a more efficient policy