natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja za pristojbine, obračunane za plačilo preletnih storitev in navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa na terminalih v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) 1794/2006 o določitvi skupne ureditve pristojbin za navigacijske službe zračnega prometa ali za pristojbine, obračunane za plačilo storitev zemeljske oskrbe iz Priloge k Direktivi Sveta 96/67/ES o dostopu do trga storitev zemeljske oskrbe na letališčih Skupnosti.
This Directive shall not apply to the charges collected for the remuneration of en-route and terminal air navigation services in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) 1794/2006 laying down a common charging scheme for air navigation services , or to the charges collected for the remuneration of groundhandling services referred to in the Annex of Council Directive 96/67/EC on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports .
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja za pristojbine, obračunane za plačilo preletnih storitev in navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa na terminalih v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) 1794/2006 o določitvi skupne ureditve pristojbin za navigacijske službe zračnega prometa ali za pristojbine, obračunane za plačilo storitev zemeljske oskrbe iz Priloge k Direktivi Sveta 96/67/ES o dostopu do trga storitev zemeljske oskrbe na letališčih Skupnosti.
This Directive shall not apply to the charges collected for the remuneration of en‑route and terminal air navigation services in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) 1794/2006 laying down a common charging scheme for air navigation services, or to the charges collected for the remuneration of groundhandling services referred to in the Annex of Council Directive 96/67/EC on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports
Ta direktiva ne posega v pravico vsake države članice, da določi dodatne ureditvene ukrepe, ki niso v nasprotju s to direktivo ali drugimi ustreznimi določbami prava skupnosti v zvezi s katerim koli upravnim organom letališča na njenem ozemlju.
This Directive is without prejudice to the right of each Member State to apply additional regulatory measures that are not incompatible with this Directive or other relevant provisions of Community law with regard to any airport managing body established in its territory.
To lahko vključuje zlasti odobritev sistemov obračunavanja pristojbin in/ali raven pristojbin na podlagi konkurenčnega prava.
This may include in particular the approval of charging systems and/or the level of charges based on competition law.
(ea) "potrošnik" je vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, ki od uporabnika letališča kupi prevozno storitev.
(ea) 'consumer' means any natural person or legal entity that purchases a transport service from an airport user.
Države članice zagotovijo, da pri letaliških pristojbinah ni razlik med uporabniki letališč ali letalskimi potniki.
Member States shall ensure that airport charges do not discriminate among airport users or air passengers.
Države članice zagotovijo, da pri letaliških pristojbinah ni razlik med uporabniki letališč ali letalskimi potniki , ki uporabljajo enako storitev .
Member States shall ensure that airport charges do not discriminate among airport users or air passengers using the same service.
Če uporabniki letališč uporabljajo različno letališko infrastrukturo in storitve, je lahko stopnja letaliških pristojbin različna.
In case airport users use different airport infrastructure and services the level of airport charges can be different.
Ne sme pa se med uporabniki letališč ali letalskimi potniki delati razlik, ko gre za isto storitev.
For the same service there must be no discrimination among airport users or air passengers.
Tako posvetovanje se opravi , kadar je predvidena revizija ali uvedba novih pristojbin in v vsakem primeru vsaj vsaki dve leti .
Such consultation shall take place when a revision of charges or the imposition of new charges is contemplated, and in any event at least once every two years.
S predlogom spremembe se poskuša preprečevati upravna bremena s posvetovanji glede letaliških pristojbin le, kadar za to obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi.
The purpose of the amendment is to eliminate administrative burdens by holding consultations over airport charges issues in case there is a ground for discussion.
Predlog tudi upošteva, da so bile cene med letališči in letalskimi prevozniki ponekod dogovorjene za več let.
It also takes into account the situation where prices have been agreed between airports and airlines for several years.
Upravni organ letališča svojo končno odločitev objavi najkasneje šest mesecev pred začetkom veljavnosti.
The airport managing body shall publish its final decision no later than 6 months before it enters into force.
Merila za objavo določi regulativni organ.
The criteria for publication shall be defined by the regulatory authority.
Obdobje dveh mesecev je prekratko in bi lahko negativno vplivalo na regije, odvisne od turizma.
This period of 2 months is to short.
Organizatorji potovanj namreč potrebujejo več časa za prilagoditev odločitvi, saj se morajo o izvajanju storitev pogosto dogovoriti znatno vnaprej.
Regions that depend on tourism could be greatly affected as tour operators need more time to accommodate to the decision because they often have reach agreements to provide services way before.
Države članice zagotovijo, da upravni organ letališča vsakemu uporabniku letališča ali zastopnikom ali združenjem uporabnikov letališč enkrat na leto posreduje informacije o elementih, ki so podlaga za določanje ravni vseh pristojbin, ki se zaračunavajo na letališču.
Member States shall ensure that the airport managing body provides each airport user, or the representatives or associations of airport users, once a year with information on the components serving as a basis for determining the level of all charges levied at the airport.
Te informacije morajo vključevati vsaj:
This information shall at least include:
Ob reviziji pristojbin ali predvideni uvedbi novih pristojbin države članice zagotovijo, da upravni organ letališča vsakemu uporabniku letališča ali zastopnikom ali združenjem uporabnikov letališč posreduje informacije o elementih, ki so podlaga za določanje ravni vseh pristojbin, ki se zaračunavajo na letališču.
Member States shall ensure that, when a revision of charges or the imposition of new charges is contemplated, the airport managing body provides each airport user, or the representatives or associations of airport userswith information on the components serving as a basis for determining the level of all charges levied at the airport.
V skladu s členom 4(1).
In line with Article 4 paragraph 1 .
Države članice zagotovijo, da uporabniki letališč upravnemu organu letališča redno posredujejo informacije, zlasti o:
Member States shall ensure that airport users submit information to the management body on a regular basis , concerning in particular:
Ob reviziji pristojbin ali predvideni uvedbi novih pristojbin države članice zagotovijo, da uporabniki letališč upravnemu organu letališča posredujejo informacije, zlasti o:
Member States shall ensure that airport users submit information to the management body when a revision of charges or the imposition of new charges is contemplated , concerning in particular:
V skladu s členom 4(1).
In line with Article 4 paragraph 1.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se upravni organ letališča pred dokončanjem načrtov za nove infrastrukturne projekte posvetuje z uporabniki letališča.
Member States shall ensure that the airport managing body consults with airport users before plans for new infrastructure projects are finalised .
Merila za uvedbo novih pristojbin morajo upoštevati glavne dejavnosti letališča, ki lahko vplivajo na uporabnike letališč in potrošnike.
The criteria for introducing new charges should reflect the core operations of the airport that might affect airport users and consumers. .
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko v primeru, ko ni dosežen sporazum o ravneh storitev, vsaka stran zaprosi za posredovanje neodvisen regulativni organ.
Member States shall ensure that, in the event no agreement on service levels is reached, either party may seek intervention of the independent regulatory authority.
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko v primeru, ko ni dosežen sporazum o ravneh storitev, vsaka stran zaprosi za posredovanje neodvisen regulativni organ.
Member States shall ensure that, in the event that no agreement on service levels is reached, either party may seek the intervention of the independent regulatory authority.
Države članice opredelijo natančne pogoje, pod katerimi lahko vsaka stran zaprosi za posredovanje neodvisnega regulativnega organa.
Member States shall define the precise conditions under which either party may seek the intervention of the independent regulatory authority.
Zagotoviti je treba, da se na neodvisni regulativni organ obrne le, ko so vse druge možnosti za dogovor izčrpane in ko za pritožbo obstajajo tehtni razlogi.
It should be ensured the parties only turn to the independent regulatory authority when all dialogue possibilities have been exhausted and only if there are serious grounds that justify an appeal.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, s katerimi upravnemu organu letališča omogočijo, da spreminja kakovost in obseg posebnih letaliških storitev, terminalov ali delov terminalov, z namenom opravljati prilagojene storitve ali zagotoviti namenski terminal ali del terminala ter izpolniti obveznost javnega interesa .
Member States shall take the necessary measures to allow the airport managing body to vary the quality and scope of particular airport services, terminals or parts of terminals, with the aim of providing tailored services or a dedicated terminal or part of a terminal and to the extent necessary to ensure compliance with public service obligations .
Raven letaliških pristojbin se lahko razlikuje v skladu s kakovostjo in obsegom takih storitev , v primeru regij iz člena 299(2) Pogodbe ES pa lahko vsem potrošnikom omogoči splošni dostop do storitev .
The level of airport charges may be differentiated according to the quality and scope of such services and, in the case of the regions mentioned in Article 299(2) of the Treaty, enable all consumers to benefit from universal access to the services provided .
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo uporabniki letališča, ki želijo uporabljati prilagojene storitve ali namenski terminal ali del terminala, dostop do teh storitev in terminala ali dela terminala.
Member States shall ensure that any airport user wishing to use the tailored services or dedicated terminal or part of a terminal, shall have access to these services and terminal or part of terminal.
Države članice zagotovijo nediskriminacijo, tako da imajo uporabniki letališča, ki želijo uporabljati prilagojene storitve ali namenski terminal ali del terminala, dostop do teh storitev in terminala ali dela terminala.
Member States shall ensure non-discrimination so that any airport user wishing to use the tailored services or dedicated terminal or part of a terminal, shall have access to these services and terminal or part of terminal.
Če se hoče upravni organ letališča ali uporabnik letališča pritožiti glede katere koli zadeve, ki spada na področje uporabe te direktive, lahko brez poseganja v obstoječe mehanizme za reševanje sporov in v predpisan prizivni postopek pod pogoji, ki jih določi zadevna država članica, pritožbo predloži neodvisnemu regulativnemu organu, ki deluje kot organ za poravnavo sporov; sklep izda v dveh mesecih po prejemu pritožbe.
Without prejudice to existing dispute resolution mechanisms or statutory appeal procedures, where an airport managing body or an airport user has a complaint with regard to any matter falling within the scope of this Directive, it may , on conditions determined by the Member State concerned, refer the complaint to the independent regulatory authority which, acting as dispute resolution authority, shall issue a decision within two months after receipt of the complaint.
Pravico do pritožbe je treba zagotoviti v skladu s pravnim sistemom posamezne države članice.
The right to appeal should be ensured according to each Member States' legal system.
Neodvisni regulativni organ izda letno poročilo o svojih dejavnostih.
The independent regulatory authority shall publish an annual report concerning its activities.
Neodvisni regulativni organ izda letno poročilo o svojih dejavnostih vsak peti mesec v letu .
The independent regulatory authority shall publish an annual report concerning its activities in the fifth month of each year.
Poročilo mora biti dostopno uporabnikom, Komisiji in javnosti.
It should make its report available to users, the Commission and the general public.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju te direktive najpozneje štiri leta po začetku njene veljavnosti in, če je primerno, ustrezen predlog.
The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of this Directive no later then 4 years after its entry into force as well as, when appropriate, any suitable proposal.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju te direktive , v katerem oceni napredek pri izpolnjevanju ciljev uredbe, najpozneje štiri leta po začetku veljavnosti direktive in, če je potrebno, oblikuje ustrezen predlog.
The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of this Directive , assessing progress made in attaining the objectives of this regulation, no later then 4 years after its entry into force as well as, when appropriate, any suitable proposal.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta in Komisije o sklenitvi stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskima skupnostma in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Črno goro na drugi strani
on the proposal for a Council and Commission decision on the conclusion of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part
– ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta in Komisije ( KOM(2007)0350 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council and Commission decision ( COM(2007)0350 ),
– ob upoštevanju prošnje Sveta za privolitev Parlamenta v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3) v zvezi z drugim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in členom 310 Pogodbe ES ( C6-0463/2007 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, second sentence and Article 310 of the EC Treaty ( C6‑0463/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6‑0498/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0498/2007 ),
Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum med ES in Črno goro
Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the EC and Montenegro
Datum prošnje za privolitev EP
Committee responsible
o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi instrumenta prilagodljivosti
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0786 – C6-0450/2007 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council ( COM(2007)0786 - C6-0450/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, zlasti točke 27
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, and in particular Point 27 thereof
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucija z dne 20. junija 2007 o financiranju evropskega programa satelitske radionavigacije (Galileo) v skladu z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 17. maja 2006 in večletnim finančnim okvirom 2007–2013,
– having regard to its resolution of 20 June 2007 on the financing of the European programme of satellite radionavigation (Galileo) under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 and the multiannual financial framework 2007-2013
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2007)0272 .
Adopted Texts, P6_TA(2007)0272 . ,
– ob upoštevanju prve obravnave predloga splošnega proračuna za leto 2008,
– having regard to its first reading on the 2008 draft general budget,
– ob upoštevanju izida usklajevalnega sestanka o proračunu 23. novembra 2007,
– having regard to the outcome of the conciliation meeting of 23 November 2007,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6–0499/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0499/2007 ),
A. ker proračunski organ meni, da je treba zagotoviti dovolj sredstev za programe satelitskega navigacijskega sistema,
A. whereas the budgetary authority considers it imperative to adequately fund the GNSS Programmes,
B. ker je bilo pri pripravi proračuna EU za leto 2008 veliko pozornosti posvečene čedalje večjim potrebam skupne zunanje in varnostne politike, zlasti zagotavljanju potrebnih sredstev za misijo EU na Kosovu,
B. whereas increasing needs in the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) area were of great concern during the preparation of the 2008 Budget, particularly in view of the need to mobilise the necessary resources for the EU mission in Kosovo,
C. ker sta obe veji proračunskega organa na usklajevalnem sestanku 23. novembra 2007 sklenili, da uporabita instrument prilagodljivosti in tako v proračunu 2008 zagotovita dodatna sredstva za:
C. whereas the two arms of the budgetary authority decided at the conciliation meeting on 23 November 2007 to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to complement the financing in the 2008 budget of:
- evropske programe sistema satelitske navigacije (EGNOS in GALILEO), in sicer v znesku 200 milijonov EUR;
- the European GNSS programmes (EGNOS-GALILEO) for an amount of EUR 200 million;
- skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko v znesku 70 milijonov EUR;
- the CFSP for an amount of EUR 70 million;
z dne 13. decembra 2007
of 18 December 2007
1. , zlasti točke 27,
1. , and in particular Point 27 thereof,
Na usklajevalnem sestanku 23. novembra 2007 sta obe veji proračunskega organa sklenili, da uporabita instrument prilagodljivosti in tako v proračunu 2008 zagotovita dodatna sredstva za:
At the conciliation meeting on 23 November 2007 the two arms of the budgetary authority agreed to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to complement the financing in the 2008 budget of:
– evropske programe sistema satelitske navigacije (EGNOS in GALILEO), in sicer v znesku 200 milijonov EUR;
– the European GNSS programmes (EGNOS-GALILEO) for an amount of EUR 200 million;
– skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko, in sicer v znesku 70 milijonov EUR;
– the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) for an amount of EUR 70 million.
Za splošni proračun Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008 (v nadaljevanju proračun 2008) se instrument prilagodljivosti uporabi za zagotovitev zneska v višini 270 milijonov EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008 (hereinafter “the 2008 budget”), the Flexibility Instrument shall be used to provide the sum of EUR 270 million in commitment appropriations.
Ta znesek bo na voljo za financiranje:
These amounts shall be used to complement the financing of:
– evropskih programov sistema satelitske navigacije (EGNOS in GALILEO), in sicer v znesku 200 milijonov EUR, v člen 06 02 10 Program Galileo v podrazdelku 1a;
– the European GNSS programmes (EGNOS-GALILEO) for an amount of EUR 200 million, under Article 06 02 10 Galileo Programme in Sub-Heading 1a;
– skupne zunanje in varnostne politike v znesku 70 milijonov EUR, v poglavje 19 03 v razdelku 4.
– the CFSP for an amount of EUR 70 million, under Chapter 19 03 in Heading 4.
Ta odločitev se istočasno kot proračun 2008 objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije .
This decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union at the same time as the 2008 budget.
V Bruslju, 18. decembra 2007
Done at Brussels, 18 December 2007
Na usklajevalnem sestanku 23. novembra sta se Evropski parlament in Svet sporazumela o uporabi instrumenta fleksibilnosti za Galileo ter skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko.
During the Conciliation held on 23 November the European Parliament and the Council reached an agreement on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument in favour of Galileo and CFSP.
Galileo – v sredini leta se je izkazalo, da bo javno financiranje edini vir sredstev za program Galileo.
Galileo - As for Galileo, mid of this year it appeared clear that public funding would have been the only source of credits for the Programme.
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 20. junija 2007 nasprotoval skupnemu financiranju programa Galileo z medvladnimi sredstvi in sredstvi Skupnosti.
The European Parliament expressed its opposition to a mixed Community and intergovernmental funding of Galileo in its resolution of 20 June 2007.
Na prvi obravnavi v proračunskem postopku je Parlament pozdravil predlog Komisije za pregled večletnega finančnega okvira.
During the budgetary procedure, in its first reading, the Parliament welcomed the Commission proposal for a review of the MFF.
Svet je temu stališču nasprotoval, zato je bilo vprašanje financiranja Galilea obravnavano v postopku usklajevanja.
The Council opposed this position and the point about Galileo financing has been dealt with in the Conciliation procedure.
Skupna zunanja in varnostna politika – sredstva za ta namen so bila v letu 2007 nenehno predmet razprav in posvetovanja.
CFSP - During 2007, CFSP funding was the subject of continuous debate and deliberations.
V razdelku 4 proračuna EU namreč ni bilo dovolj sredstev, da bi lahko financirali vse nove potrebe, zlasti naloge na Kosovu in načrtovane policijske misije EU, pa tudi druge misije, kot je Eupol v Afganistanu.
The challenge of funding new needs, especially for Kosovo and the planned EU police mission, but also for other missions such as EUPOL Afghanistan, were clearly difficult to reconcile with the limited financial space in heading 4 of the EU budget.
O omenjenih finančnih težavah ter političnih in praktičnih vprašanjih, ki so v ozadju teh potreb po sredstvih, je vse leto potekala razgreta razprava.
This, and of course the political and "on-the-ground" issues that underlie these financial needs, was hotly debated during the whole year.
Pet letnih skupnih srečanj odborov za zunanje zadeve in proračun Evropskega parlamenta ter Sveta je bilo tako zelo koristnih in konstruktivnih.
To this end, the five annual joint meetings between Parliament's Foreign Affairs and Budgets Committees and the Council were extremely useful and very constructive.
Zelo razveseljivo je, da je bil na novembrskem proračunskem usklajevanju le dosežen dogovor o uporabi instrumenta prilagodljivosti v znesku 70 milijonov EUR, tako da celotna proračunska sredstva znašajo 285 milijonov EUR.
That a final agreement could be found at the November Budget Conciliation, mobilising the flexibility instrument for an amount of EUR 70 million and fixing total appropriations at EUR 285 million, is to be warmly welcomed.
Poročevalec kljub temu opozarja, da je strukturni primanjkljaj na tem področju (potrebe v letih 2007 in 2008 so bile občutno večje kot prvotne napovedi) resen problem za proračunski organ.
The rapporteur underlines, nevertheless, that the structural deficit which seems to exist in this area (annual amounts in both 2007 and 2008 far higher than the original forecasts) constitutes a real problem for the budgetary authority.
Prepričan je, da bo treba to vprašanje upoštevati pri pregledu finančne perspektive ali pri vnaprejšnjih predlogih.
He strongly believes that, for future years, this must be taken into account as a part of the revision process of the current financial perspective or, indeed, in prior proposals.
Po dolgih pogajanjih je Svet le nekoliko popustil zahtevam Parlamenta.
After long negotiations, the Council moved in the direction of the Parliament requests.