natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Računsko sodišče je poudarilo, da je končni proračun nadzornega organa sicer znašal 436,5 milijona EUR, vendar je bil zaradi zamud pri programu Galileo dejansko manjši za polovico.
The ECA highlighted the fact that, whereas the Authority's final budget was EUR 436,5 million, there was a de facto 50 % budget reduction due to delays in the Galileo programme.
Tako je imel nadzorni organ v resnici na voljo samo 210 milijonov EUR.
The funds actually made available to the Authority were EUR 210 million.
Računsko sodišče je izrazilo kritiko na račun nizke ravni porabe za dejavnosti poslovanja, saj je ta za prevzete obveznosti znašala 63 %, za plačila pa 51 %.
The ECA criticised that the consumption level for operational activities was low, 63 % for commitments and 51 % for payments.
Poleg tega je naletelo na naslednje pomanjkljivosti pri upravljanju proračuna: ni jasne povezave med delovnim programom in proračunom nadzornega organa, prerazporeditve niso ne utemeljene ne dokumentirane, vedno znova se pojavljajo zamude pri knjiženju nalogov za izterjavo in predstavitev izvrševanja proračuna je nedosledna.
In addition, the ECA highlighted weaknesses in the management of the budget: absence of a clear link between the Authority's work programme and the budget, transfers neither justified nor documented, repeated late booking of recovery orders and inconsistent presentation of the budget implementation.
Nadzorni organ je v odgovoru pojasnil, da je moral zaradi izjemnih okoliščin, namreč 50-odstotnega dejanskega zmanjšanja proračuna, opraviti veliko prerazporeditev, zato je bilo zelo težko ohraniti jasno povezavo med delovnim programom in proračunom.
In its reply the Authority explained that it had to perform a high number of transfers due to an exceptional situation, the de facto budget reduction of 50 %, which made it extremely difficult to keep a clear link between work programme and budget.
Izvršni direktor nadzornega organa je v posebnih odgovorih na vprašanja poročevalca zagotovil, da je upošteval kritike Računskega sodišča, da bi izboljšal proračunsko poročanje in dokumentiranje proračunskih prerazporeditev ter poskrbel za pravočasno knjiženje nalogov za izterjavo.
In his additional answers provided to questions by the rapporteur the Executive Director of the Authority explained he had taken into account the ECA's observations in order to improve budgetary reporting, documenting budget transfers and timely booking of recovery orders.
b) Sredstva projektov Galileo in EGNOS v računovodskih izkazih
b) Galileo and EGNOS project assets in the accounts
Računsko sodišče je izrazilo kritiko glede sredstev projekta Galileo, namreč da nadzorni organ v računovodske izkaze ni vključil zadovoljivih informacij, saj kljub dogovorom o prenosu med zadevnimi stranmi (skupno podjetje za Galileo, ESA in nadzorni organ) do konca leta 2007 ni bila sestavljena evidenca sredstev v lasti ESA.
With regard to Galileo project assets the ECA criticised that the Authority was unable to provide sufficient information about in its accounts, as no list of the assets held by ESA had been established by the end of 2007, despite existing transfer agreements between the parties concerned (GJU, ESA and the Authority).
Izvršni direktor nadzornega organa se je v odgovoru na dodatna vprašanja poročevalca skliceval na sporazum med ESA in nadzornim organom z dne 16. maja 2007 o preverjanju v orbiti za projekt Galileo in projektu EGNOS, ki določa, da se lastništvo sredstev, pridobljenih med omenjenim preverjanjem, prenese na nadzorni organ.
In his replies to the rapporteur's additional questions the Authority's Executive Director referred to the agreement between ESA and the Authority of 16 May 2007 on the Galileo in orbit validation phase and EGNOS, which provides that the ownership of the assets produced in the Galileo in orbit validation phase shall be transferred to the Authority.
Navedel je še, da bodo pravice in obveznosti iz tega sporazuma prenesene na Skupnost v skladu z Uredbo št. 683/2008, po kateri je Skupnost nova lastnica sredstev projekta Galileo.
He stated that the rights and obligations out of this agreement will be transferred to the Community in accordance with Regulation No. 683/2008, pursuant to which the Community is the new owner of the Galileo project assets.
Računsko sodišče je izrazilo kritiko, da ni na voljo natančnega popisa sredstev projekta EGNOS in da iz računovodskih izkazov nadzornega organa ni mogoče razbrati, kolikšna je njihova vrednost.
With regard to EGNOS project assets the ECA criticised that no accurate inventory of these assets was available and there was no indication of their value in the Authority's accounts.
V skladu s tem sporazumom bodo sredstva, pridobljena v okviru programa EGNOS in dodeljena ESA, prenesena na nadzorni organ v skladu z dogovorom z vlagatelji v projekt EGNOS.
According to this agreement assets produced in the framework of the EGNOS programme vested in ESA shall be transferred to the Authority, subject to an agreement with the EGNOS investors.
Potrdil je, da je bil v letu 2008 dosežen občuten napredek, saj so se vlagatelji v projekt EGNOS dogovorili o pogojih prenosa sredstev.
He informed that substantial progress was made in 2008 as the EGNOS investors agreed on the conditions of the transfer of the assets.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 683/2008 je lastnica sredstev, ustvarjenih v programu EGNOS, Skupnost.
Pursuant to Regulation No. 683/2008 the Community is the owner of the assets created under the EGNOS programme.
To pomeni, da je bil nadzorni organ lastnik sredstev samo v prehodnem obdobju v letih 2007 in 2008, od trenutka, ko jih je prevzel od skupnega podjetja Galileo, do trenutka, ko jih je prenesel na Komisijo.
This means that the Authority was the owner of these assets only for a transitional period in 2007 / 2008, from the moment when it took over those assets from GJU until the moment it transferred them to the Commission.
Tako je treba vprašanja, na katera je opozorilo Računsko sodišče, zdaj nasloviti na Komisijo.
Thus, the questions highlighted by the ECA now also concern the Commission.
Slednji je odgovoril, da priznava samo vnaprejšnja plačila v znesku 53,2 milijona EUR.
The Authority replied that it only recognised advance payments of EUR 53,2 million.
c) Prenos dejavnosti in sredstev skupnega projekta Galileo na nadzorni organ
c) Takeover of GJU activities and assets by the Authority
Računsko sodišče je imelo več kritičnih pripomb na račun prenosa dejavnosti in sredstev skupnega podjetja Galileo na nadzorni organ.
The ECA formulated a series of critical remarks concerning the transfer of GJU activities and assets to the Authority.
Prevzem je bil opravljen 1. januarja 2007 in tako neposredno zadeva postopek podeljevanja razrešnice za leto 2007.
The transfer took effect on 1 January 2007 and thus directly concerns the 2007 discharge exercise.
Nadzorni organ je posredoval pojasnila za vse pripombe in se v večini primerov ni strinjal z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča.
The Authority provided explanations concerning each critical remark, disagreeing with many of the ECA's observations.
Računsko sodišče je opozorilo, da so sredstva skupnega podjetja Galileo vključevala vnaprejšnja plačila Evropski vesoljski agenciji.
The ECA highlighted that GJU assets included pre-financings paid to the ESA.
Trdilo je, da čeprav je ESA prejela približno 558 milijonov EUR, je nadzorni organ vknjižil samo 53,7 milijona EUR, ki jih je tej agenciji plačal leta 2007.
It criticised that, although ESA had received an amount of some EUR 558 million, the Authority only recorded EUR 53,7 million which the Authority paid to ESA in 2007.
Zato je sklenilo, da obstaja precejšnja negotovost glede resničnega zneska vnaprejšnjega financiranja, ki je bilo ob koncu leta 2007 del sredstev nadzornega organa.
The ECA concluded that there was a serious uncertainty with regard to the real amount of outstanding pre-financings forming part of the Authority's assets as at the end of 2007.
Nadzorni organ je odvrnil, da so bila vsa plačila, ki jih je opravilo skupno podjetje Galileo, obravnavana kot odhodki v letnih računovodskih izkazih tega podjetja in se zato niso vknjižila v računovodske izkaze organa.
The Authority replied that all payments made by GJU were treated as expenditure in the GJU annual accounts and therefore not recorded in the Authority's accounts.
Računsko sodišče je imelo pripombe tudi glede tega, kako je nadzorni organ knjižil 150,5 milijona EUR, ki so bili preneseni nanj s skupnega podjetja v letih 2006 in 2007.
In addition, the ECA criticised how the Authority recorded an amount of EUR 150,5 million transferred to the Authority from GJU in 2006 and 2007.
Računsko sodišče je še ugotovilo, da je skupno podjetje Galileo prejelo 15 milijonov EUR od tretjih strank, in sicer po 5 milijonov EUR od izraelskega industrijskega centra za raziskave in razvoj (MATIMOP), kitajskega nacionalnega centra za daljinsko zaznavanje (NRSCC) in Belgije.
Finally, the ECA noted that the GJU had received EUR 15 million from third parties, i.e. amounts of EUR 5 million each from the Israeli Industry Centre for Research and Development (MATIMOP), the National Remote Sensing Centre of China (NRSCC - People's Republic of China) and Belgium.
Trdilo je, da status teh zneskov ni bil jasen in da niso bili razkriti v računovodskih izkazih nadzornega organa.
The ECA criticised that the status of these sums was unclear and they were not disclosed in the Authority's accounts.
Nadzorni organ se je branil, da je bilo v načrtu likvidacije skupnega podjetja Galileo sklenjeno, da se neporabljeni zneski ne bodo razdelili med delničarje, in da ga je upravitelj prenehanja skupnega podjetja obvestil, da so mu bila prenesena preostala sredstva, razen zneska 200.000 EUR.
The Authority replied that in the liquidation plan of GJU it was decided not to redistribute the unused amounts to the GJU shareholders and that the liquidator of GJU informed the Authority that all unused funds except an amount of EUR 200 000 had been transferred to the Authority.
Poročevalec priporoča, da Parlament izvršnemu direktorju nadzornega organa podeli razrešnico, ker mu ni mogoče naložiti neposredne odgovornosti za pravno negotovost v zvezi z računovodskimi izkazi za leto 2007, ki je nastala zaradi političnih odločitev o projektu Galileo.
The rapporteur recommends that Parliament grants the Executive Director of the Authority discharge for the following reasons: The Executive Director of the Authority cannot be held directly responsible for the legal uncertainties surrounding the 2007 accounts, which were due to highly political decisions concerning the Galileo project.
Poleg tega bo moral nadzorni organ računovodske izkaze za leto 2008 pripraviti v skladu z novo pravno podlago, ki jo bo moralo pri reviziji upoštevati tudi Računsko sodišče.
The Authority's accounts for 2008 will have to be established and audited by the ECA under the new legal framework.
Tako bo lahko Evropski parlament šele v postopku razrešnice za leto 2008 ocenil, ali novi okvir omogoča pravilno pripravo računovodskih izkazov.
Thus, the forthcoming 2008 discharge exercise will allow Parliament to evaluate if the new framework allows for a proper establishment of the accounts.
Poročevalec je zaskrbljen zaradi pripomb Računskega sodišča glede tega, kako je nadzorni organ opravil prevzem dejavnosti in sredstev skupnega podjetja Galileo.
The rapporteur is concerned about the ECA's critical remarks on how the Authority managed the takeover of GJU activities and assets.
Ocenjuje, da bi moral organ, odgovoren za podelitev razrešnice, to vprašanje podrobneje preučiti.
He considers that this issue deserves further examination by the discharge authority.
Ker Računsko sodišče trenutno opravlja posebno revizijo v zvezi s tem vprašanjem, poročevalec priporoča, naj Parlament počaka na ugotovitve te revizije in šele potem oblikuje končno mnenje.
As the ECA currently carries out a specific audit task on this issue, the rapporteur recommends that Parliament should await the specific audit findings of the ECA in order to form its final opinion.
Računsko sodišče pa je treba pozvati, naj pripravi posebno poročilo o tem.
The ECA should be invited to present a special report.
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropske agencije za železniški promet za proračunsko leto 2007
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2007
MNENJE Odbora za promet in turizem ...................................................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ................................11
– ob upoštevanju zaključnih računov Evropske agencije za železniški promet za proračunsko leto 2007
– having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2007
– ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o končnih letnih računovodskih izkazih Evropske agencije za železniški promet za proračunsko leto 2007, skupaj z odgovori agencije
– having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2007, together with the Agency's replies
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 881/2004 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za železniški promet
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 establishing a European Railway Agency
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6–0165/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0165/2009 ),
o zaključku poslovnih knjig Evropske agencije za železniški promet za proračunsko leto 2007
on the closure of the accounts of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2007
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropske agencije za železniški promet za proračunsko leto 2007,
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2007
B. ker je Parlament 22. aprila 2008 podelil razrešnico izvršnemu direktorju Evropske agencije za železniški promet glede izvrševanja njenega proračuna za proračunsko leto 2006
B. whereas on 22 April 2008 Parliament granted the Executive Director of the European Railway Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2006
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0156 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0156 . ,
4. obžaluje, da je zaradi dveh sedežev ovirano delo agencije, kar ima za posledico dodatne stroške za evropske davkoplačevalce; ugotavlja, da osnutek sporazuma države gostiteljice predvideva, da ona krije dodatne stroške;
Regrets that the fact of having two seats hampers the Agency's work and results in extra costs for European taxpayers; notes that in the draft host state agreement, it is foreseen that additional costs are covered by the host state;
7. poziva agencijo, naj drži obljubo iz odgovorov Računskemu sodišču in zaključi celoten opis postopkov, ki jim je treba slediti pri zaposlovanju v prvi četrtini leta 2009;
Calls on the Agency to follow up on its promise, in its replies to the ECA, to finalise a full description of procedures to be followed as regards recruitment in the first quarter of 2009;
8. ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče, ne da bi podalo izjavo o zanesljivosti, posebej opozarja na svoje pripombe o proračunskem načrtovanju in izvrševanju;
Notes that the ECA, without qualifying its statement of assurance, draws particular attention to its observations concerning budget planning and implementation;
17. poziva agencijo, naj na osnovi člena 15(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 2343/2002, ki velja od julija 2008 in obvezuje agencije k doslednemu vodenju gotovinskega poslovanja, da se likvidna sredstva na računu omejijo iz utemeljenih razlogov in se posveti posebna pozornost izboljšanju njenega gotovinskega poslovanja;
17.Calls on the Agency, on the basis of Article 15(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2343/2002, which has been in force since July 2008 and which obliges the agencies to implement rigorous cash management in order to ensure that their cash balances are limited to duly justified requirements, to pay particular attention to improving its cash management;
Spremljanje postopka razrešnice za leto 2006
Follow-up to the 2006 discharge exercise
21. ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče (kot leta 2006) kritiziralo pomanjkljivosti izvrševanja proračuna, zlasti glede visoke stopnje prenosa sredstev;
Notes that, as in 2006, the ECA criticised weaknesses in budget implementation, in particular with regard to the high level of appropriations carried over;
Odbor za promet in turizem poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor, da kot pristojni odbor v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. obžaluje dejstvo, da agencija pri oceni svoje potrebe po gotovini ni ravnala s potrebno skrbnostjo, kar ni v skladu z načelom dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
Regrets the fact that the Agency did not take the necessary care when estimating its cash requirements, which is at odds with the principle of sound financial management;
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2007
– ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007,
– having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States for the financial year 2007
– ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o končnih letnih računovodskih izkazih Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, skupaj z odgovori agencije,
– having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States for the financial year 2007, together with the Agency's replies
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. decembra 2008 o oceni agencije FRONTEX in njenem nadaljnjem razvoju in razvoju evropskega sistema za nadzorovanje meja (EUROSUR),
– having regard to its resolution of 18 December 2008 on the evaluation and future development of the FRONTEX Agency and of the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR)
Sprejeta besedila, ( P6_TA(2008)0633 ).
Texts adopted, ( P6_TA(2008)0633 ). ,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2004 z dne 26. oktobra 2004 o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije,
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of 26 October 2004 establishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union
1. zlasti člena 30,
1. , and in particular Article 30 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0166/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0166/2009 ),
o zaključku poslovnih knjig Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007
on the closure of the accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2007
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2004 z dne 26. oktobra 2004 o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije,
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 establishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union
2. odobri zaključek poslovnih knjig Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007;
Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2007;
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007,
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union for the financial year 2007
B. ker je Parlament 22. aprila 2008 podelil izvršnemu direktorju Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije razrešnico glede izvrševanja proračuna agencije za proračunsko leto 2006
B. whereas on 22 April 2008 Parliament granted the Executive Director of the European Agency' for the Management of Operational Coordination at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2006
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0158 . in je med drugim
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0158 . and, inter alia,
- vzel na znanje pripombo Računskega sodišča v poročilu za leto 2006, da je bila stopnja prevzetih obveznosti za to leto 85-odstotna; stopnja prenosov je bila višja od 70 % skupnih stroškov in skoraj 85 % odhodkov za poslovanje; prenosi odobrenih sredstev med poglavji ali naslovi so med letom presegli skupno zgornjo mejo 10 %, ki je določena v finančni uredbi; tako proračunsko načelo specifikacije ni bilo dosledno upoštevano;
- noted the ECA's' observation in its 2006 report that for the financial year 2006 the rate of commitment was 85 %; the rate of carry-over was more than 70 % overall and nearly 85 % for operating expenditure; transfers of appropriations between chapters or titles during the year exceeded the total ceiling of 10 % provided for in the Financial Regulation; therefore, the budgetary principle of specification was not strictly observed;
- pozval agencijo, naj izboljša finančno poslovodenje, zlasti glede povečanja svojega proračuna za leti 2007 in 2008,
- called on the Agency to improve its financial management, especially as regards the increase in its budget for the financial years 2007 and 2008;
C. ker je bilo leto 2007 drugo polno leto delovanja agencije;
C. Whereas 2007 was the second full year of functioning of the Agency,
3. priznava dejstvo, poudarjeno v odgovorih agencije Računskemu sodišču, da je ocena stroškov v primeru agencije še posebej zapletena, ker se agencija zanaša na opremo, ki ji jo za delovanje zagotavljajo države članice;
Acknowledges the fact, highlighted in the Agency's replies to the ECA, that in the case of the Agency cost estimates are particularly complex as the Agency relies on equipment provided by Member States for its operations;
8. opozarja, da je bilo proračunsko leto 2006 prvo leto finančne samostojnosti agencije in njene vključenosti v postopek razrešnice;
Recalls that the 2006 financial year was the first year in which the Agency was financially autonomous and subject to the discharge procedure;