natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
j) v celoti upošteva izredno vlogo Ukrajine pri zagotavljanju varne oskrbe z energijo v EU in potrebno pozornost posveti dejstvu, da je popoln nadzor Ukrajine nad varnostjo njene oskrbe z energijo neposredno povezan z njeno politično stabilnostjo in blaginjo;
j) take fully into account Ukraine’s critical role in ensuring the energy security of the EU and give due attention to the fact that Ukraine’s full control over its energy security is directly connected to its political stability and prosperity;
k) zato od ukrajinskega energetskega sektorja zahteva, da v celoti spoštuje načela tržnega gospodarstva in preglednosti, še posebej na področju cen, dostopa do omrežja in učinkovitosti; podpre hitro integracijo Ukrajine v Evropsko energetsko skupnost; upošteva pomen podpisa Pogodbe o ustanovitvi skupnosti za energijo s strani Ukrajine; v zvezi s tem pozove k pospeševanju postopka ocenjevanja jedrske varnosti v vseh delujočih jedrskih elektrarnah v Ukrajini v skladu z delovnim programom skupne delovne skupine za jedrsko varnost; pomaga pri diverzifikaciji ukrajinskih virov, npr. z dostopom do neposrednih virov dobave v osrednji Aziji; s podporo spremembi smeri naftovoda Odesa-Brodi in z zavzemanjem za njegovo podaljšanje proti EU okrepi strateško vlogo Ukrajine kot tranzitne države za dobavo nafte in plina v EU; poudari potrebo po vključitvi Ukrajine v projekt razvoja plinovoda Nabucco, da se vzpostavi energetski koridor Kaspijsko morje–Črno morje–EU ter da se električno omrežje Ukrajine priključi na omrežje UCTE; poziva k okrepitvi energetskega sodelovanja v okviru združenja GUUAM;
k) urge, therefore, that the energy sector of Ukraine fully comply with principles of market economy and transparency, in particular as far as prices, network access and efficiency are concerned; support rapid integration of Ukraine into the European Energy Community; note the importance of Ukraine’s signing up to the Energy Community Treaty; in this regard, urge the speeding-up of the procedure for nuclear safety evaluation of all operating nuclear power plants in Ukraine, in accordance with the work programme of the Joint Working Group on Nuclear Safety; assist diversification of Ukraine’s resources, e.g. by accessing direct supplies from Central Asia; strengthen its strategic role as a transit country for supplying the EU with oil and gas, e.g. by backing a reversal of the Odessa-Brody pipeline and advocating its extension into the EU; emphasise the need to involve Ukraine in the development of the Nabucco gas pipeline project, to complete the Caspian Sea-Black Sea-EU energy corridor and to join Ukraine’s electricity grid to the UCTE network; press for a strengthening of energy cooperation within the framework of GUAM;
l) poudari pomen strategije za trajnostno energijo za Ukrajino; poudari, da si mora Ukrajina na podlagi izkušenj pri jedrski nesreči v Černobilu ter zaradi težav ob vse večje odvisnosti od uvoza in podnebnih sprememb močno prizadevati za varčevanje z energijo, energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljivo energijo; poudari, da je Ukrajina ena od energetsko najbolj neučinkovitih držav na svetu ter da bi upoštevanje standardov povprečne učinkovitosti državi omogočilo, da zadovolji notranjo potrebo po energiji; pozove k tehničnemu sodelovanju med EU in Ukrajino na tem področju, ki naj se vključi v nov izboljšan sporazum;
l) stress the importance of a sustainable energy strategy for Ukraine; point out that, following the experience of the nuclear catastrophe of Chernobyl, and facing the problems of growing import dependence and the challenge of climate change, Ukraine has to make major efforts in respect of energy saving, energy efficiency and renewable energy; point out that Ukraine is one of the most energy-inefficient countries in the world and that achieving average efficiency standards would allow the country to satisfy its internal energy demand; call for technical cooperation in this sphere between the EU and Ukraine, and for such cooperation to be included in the new enhanced agreement;
m) krepi zmožnosti Ukrajine kot ključnega partnerja pri upravljanju migracijskih tokov in meja; predvidi nadaljnje skupne korake v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu, vključno s končno dodelitvijo privilegiranega statusa Ukrajini v zvezi z Europolom; zagotovi učinkovito izvajanje vizumskih olajšav in sporazuma o ponovnem sprejemu; opredeli cilje in potrebne korake za odpravo vizumov;
m) strengthen Ukraine’s potential as a key partner in management of migration flows and borders; envisage further joint steps in the fight against organised crime including the eventual conferment on Ukraine of ‘privileged status’ in relation to Europol; ensure effective implementation of visa facilitation and readmission agreements; envisage the objective of and necessary steps towards the introduction of a visa-free travel regime;
n) okrepi sodelovanje med EU in Ukrajino pri okoljskih vprašanjih in utrdi zmožnost Ukrajine za reševanje vprašanj v zvezi s kakovostjo zraka in vode, ravnanjem z odpadki, varstvom okolja in onesnaženjem zaradi sevanja, ki imajo v nekaterih primerih resne čezmejne posledice; nudi tehnično in finančno pomoč Ukrajini v procesu njenega postopnega približevanja okoljskemu pravu EU in okoljskim standardom, ki temeljijo na mednarodnem okoljskem pravu, med drugim na konvenciji Espoo o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje in bernski konvenciji o varstvu prosto živečega evropskega rastlinstva in živalstva ter njunih naravnih življenjskih prostorov; predvidi ustanovitev popolnoma operativnega in trajnostnega mehanizma za krepitev okoljske ozaveščenosti in varstva okolja, in sicer z ustanovitvijo foruma za sodelovanje med vladami, civilno družbo in nevladnimi organizacijami ter zasebnim sektorjem v vzhodni soseščini EU;
n) deepen cooperation between the EU and Ukraine on environmental issues and strengthen Ukraine's capacity to tackle matters relating to air and water quality, waste management, nature protection and radiation contamination, some of which have strong cross-border implications; provide technical and financial assistance to Ukraine in the process of gradual approximation to the EU environmental acquis and environmental standards based on international environmental law, including the Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context and the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats; envisage the setting-up of a fully operational and sustainable mechanism to promote environmental awareness and protection by providing a forum for cooperation between governments, civil society/NGOs and the private sector in the EU´s eastern neighbourhood;
o) pozove ukrajinsko politično vodstvo k izvajanju zadevnih določb Kjotskega protokola k Okvirni konvenciji ZN o spremembi podnebja, zlasti ob upoštevanju izjemnih možnosti, ki so na voljo Ukrajini, da uporabi prožne mehanizme iz protokola; podpre skupno ukrepanje EU in Ukrajine glede prihodnosti Kjotskega protokola;
o) call on the political leadership of Ukraine to implement the relevant provisions of the Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, especially bearing in mind the significant possibilities open to Ukraine to use flexible mechanisms under that Protocol; support joint action by the EU and Ukraine on the future of the Kyoto Protocol;
p) zagotovi sodelovanje Ukrajine v agencijah in programih Skupnosti, da bi povečali dostop ukrajinskih oblikovalcev politike in strokovnjakov do evropskih omrežij; poveča in razširi priložnosti za razvoj medčloveških odnosov, še posebej med akterji civilne družbe, študenti in raziskovalci; izboljša sodelovanje v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in nadaljuje delo na področju ustanavljanja/razvoja strukturiranega dialoga med EU in Ukrajino na področju znanosti, tehnologije in vesoljskih raziskav;
p) provide for Ukraine’s participation in Community agencies and programmes in order to increase the access of its policy-makers and experts to European networks; increase and widen opportunities for people-to-people contacts, in particular for civil society actors, students and researchers; enhance cooperation in the context of the Seventh Research Framework Programme and continue the work on the establishment/development of a structured EU-Ukraine dialogue on science, technology and space research;
q) poudari, da morajo države članice, ki so pristopile k EU leta 2004 in 2007, igrati dejavno vlogo pri približevanju Ukrajine Evropski uniji, pri čemer ji morajo omogočiti dostop do svojih izkušenj glede reform;
q) point out that the Member States who joined the EU in 2004 and 2007 should play an active role in Ukraine’s move towards the European Union, allowing Ukraine to benefit from their experience of reforms;
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU ( B6‑0022/2007 )
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL ( B6‑0022/2007 )
ki ga vlaga Michał Tomasz Kamiński
by Michał Tomasz Kamiński
v imenu skupine UEN
on behalf of the UEN Group
o pogajalskem mandatu za nadgraditev sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni ter Ukrajino na drugi strani
on the negotiating mandate for a new enhanced agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Ukrajini, zlasti tiste z dne 13. januarja 2005 o izidu predsedniških volitev in tiste z dne 6. aprila 2006 o parlamentarnih volitvah,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Ukraine, particularly that of 13 January 2005 on the results of the presidential elections and that of 6 April 2006 on the parliamentary elections,
– ob upoštevanju obvestila Komisije z dne 13. septembra 2006, da je predlagala smernice za nadgrajeni sporazum z Ukrajino, ki jih mora zdaj potrditi še Svet,
– having regard to the Commission announcement of 13 September 2006 that it has proposed negotiating directives for an enhanced agreement with Ukraine, now pending the approval of the Council,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave na vrhovnem srečanju Evropske unije in Ukrajine 27. oktobra 2006 v Helsinkih,
– having regard to the Joint Statement of the European Union-Ukraine Summit held on 27 October 2006 in Helsinki,
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije z 12. marca 2004 o evropski sosedski politiki ( KOM(2004)0373 ) in nedavnega Sporočila Komisije s 4. decembra 2006 o krepitvi evropske sosedske politike ( KOM(2006)0726 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 12 May 2004 on the European Neighbourhood Policy ( COM(2004)0373 ) and that of 4 December 2006 on strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy ( COM(2006)0726 ),
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta evropske sosedske politike EU in Ukrajine iz februarja 2005,
– having regard to the EU-Ukraine ENP Action Plan, of February 2005,
– ob upoštevanju člena 49 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to Article 49 of the EU Treaty,
A. ker ima Ukrajina močne zgodovinske, kulturne in gospodarske vezi z državami članicami EU in ker je ključna partnerka Unije v vzhodnoevropski soseščini,
A. whereas Ukraine has strong historical, cultural and economic links with the EU Member States and whereas it is the Union's key partner in its immediate Eastern European neighbourhood,
B. ker je treba upoštevati prizadevanja te države, da uresniči načela evropske integracije; ker je sodelovanje z Evropsko unijo na podlagi sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju eden ključnih dejavnikov, zaradi katerih je Ukrajina pristop k Evropski uniji opredelila kot glavni cilj svoje zunanje in notranje politike,
B. whereas the country's efforts to put the principles of European integration into practice should be appreciated; whereas the cooperation with the European Union resulting from the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement has been one of the key factors in bringing Ukraine to establish accession to the European Union as the main objective of its foreign and domestic policy,
C. ker je Ukrajina trenutno v obdobju tranzicije, kar je odločilnega pomena za dolgoročno stabilnost države, zagotavljanje demokracije, pluralizma in pravne države ter umestitev Ukrajine v evropsko demokratično skupnost,
C. whereas Ukraine is currently in a transition period that is decisive for the long-term stabilisation of the country, for safeguarding of democracy, pluralism and the rule of law and for anchoring Ukraine in the European democratic community,
D. ker naj bi novi, nadgrajeni sporazum odnose med Evropsko unijo in Ukrajino postavil na nove temelje, saj je treba Ukrajino spodbuditi, da nadaljuje politične, gospodarske in socialne reforme, ter okrepiti sodelovanje med partnerkama,
D. whereas the new enhanced agreement should establish relations between the European Union and Ukraine on a new basis, responding to the need to encourage Ukraine to realise further political, economic and social reforms, and to reinforce cooperation between both partners,
a) Evropski parlament je Svet že pozval, naj razmisli o tem, da bi Ukrajini ponudil jasno evropsko perspektivo; novi, nadgrajeni sporazum naj bi v tem smislu vzpostavil ustrezen in učinkovit okvir za postopno približevanje Ukrajine Evropski uniji ter tej državi odprl vrata za članstvo v EU;
(a) to take into consideration the fact that Parliament called on the Council to consider giving Ukraine a clear European perspective; the new enhanced agreement should, in this context, create an appropriate and effective framework for the gradual integration of Ukraine with the EU and open the way to its membership of the EU;
b) eden glavnih ciljev nagrajenega sporazuma mora biti utemeljitev odnosov med Evropsko unijo in Ukrajino na obojestranskem spoštovanju temeljnih evropskih vrednot;
(b) to ensure that one of the principal objectives of the enhanced agreement is to base the relationship between the European Union and Ukraine on shared respect for fundamental European values;
c) vzpostavitev prostotrgovinskega območja, ki bo po vstopu Ukrajine v Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo postalo del nadgrajenega sporazuma, mora biti pospremljena s prizadevanji za čim tesnejše približevanje Ukrajine pravnemu redu Evropske skupnosti;
(c) to ensure that the Free Trade Area, to become part of the enhanced agreement following Ukraine's accession to the WTO, is accompanied by efforts to align Ukraine, as close as possible, with the acquis communautaire;
(d) vlogi Ukrajine pri energetski oskrbi precejšnjega dela Evropske unije je treba nameniti ustrezno pozornost in podpreti postopno združevanje ukrajinskega energetskega trga z energetskim trgom EU;
(d) to pay due attention to Ukraine's role in ensuring transport of energy supplies to a significant part of the European Union energy market, and to support the progressive integration of the Ukrainian energy market with that of the EU;
Predlog priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o pogajalskem mandatu za nadgraditev sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni ter Ukrajino na drugi strani
Negotiation mandate for a new enhanced agreement between the European Community and its Member States of the one part and Ukraine of the other part
o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS o omejitvah pri trženju nekaterih merilnih naprav, ki vsebujejo živo srebro
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing of certain measuring devices containing mercury
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (5665/1/2007 – C6‑0114/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (5665/1/2007 – C6‑0114/2007 ),
Sprejeta besedila , 14.11.2006, P6_TA(2006)0483 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0069 )
Texts Adopted , 14.11.2006, P6_TA(2006)0483 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0069 )
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0218/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0218/2007 ),
Skupno stališče Sveta vsebuje večino predlogov sprememb, ki jih je Evropski parlament sprejel 14. novembra 2006.
The Council common position includes most of the amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 14 November 2006.
Pravzaprav ustreza besedilu, za katerega je Svet po razpravah s poročevalko in poročevalci v senci ponudil svojo pripravljenost za zaključitev zakonodajnega postopka v prvi obravnavi.
It corresponds in fact to the text on which, following the discussions with the rapporteur and the shadow rapporteurs, the Council had offered its availability for a conclusion of the legislative procedure in first reading.
Glavna razlika med stališčem Parlamenta in skupnim stališčem se nanaša na uporabo živega srebra v barometrih.
The main difference between Parliament's position and the common position concerns the use of mercury in barometers.
Parlament je ob tem glasoval za popolno odstopanje, Svet pa predlaga časovno omejeno odstopanje, in sicer dve leti po začetku veljave te direktive.
While Parliament voted in favour of a full derogation on this issue, Council proposes a time-limited derogation of two years after the entry into force of the Directive.
Prepoved bi v vsakem primeru veljala zgolj za nove živosrebrne barometre, medtem ko bi se tisti, ki so že v uporabi in jih najdemo na trgu rabljenih izdelkov, lahko še naprej prodajali, popravljali in vzdrževali.
The ban would in any case only apply to new mercury barometers, while those already in use and on the second hand market could still be sold, repaired and maintained.
V EU je le nekaj proizvajalcev živosrebrnih barometrov, gre zlasti za mala in srednje velika podjetja s sedežem v Veliki Britaniji, Belgiji in na Nizozemskem.
There are only few manufacturers of mercury barometers in the EU, mainly SMEs located in the UK, Belgium and the Netherlands.
V Združenem kraljestvu so že na prodaj alternativni tradicionalni barometri, ki ne vsebujejo živega srebra.
Alternative mercury-free traditional barometers are already now sold in the UK.
Poročevalka je prepričana, da je zaradi zelo nevarnih lastnosti živega srebra in zaradi velike količine živega srebra v tradicionalnih barometrih v primerjavi z npr. termometri za merjenje telesne temperature, začasno odstopanje, ki ga predlaga Svet, uravnotežen kompromis, saj bo proizvajalcem tradicionalnih barometrov omogočil prilagoditev novim razmeram.
Your rapporteur believes that, in the light of the very hazardous properties of mercury and of the much larger amount of mercury contained in traditional barometers in comparison for example with fever thermometers, the solution proposed by the Council to grant a temporary derogation in order to allow the manufacturers of traditional barometers to adapt to the new situation is a balanced compromise.
Poročevalka torej predlaga, da se skupno stališče sprejme brez predlogov sprememb.
She therefore recommends the approval of the common position without amendment.
o izvajanju prvega železniškega paketa
on the implementation of the first railway package
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru In Odboru regij o izvajanju prvega železniškega paketa ( KOM(2006)0189 ) in spremljajočega delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije ( SEC(2006)0530 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the first railway package (COM(2006)189) and the accompanying Commission staff working paper ( SEC(2006)0530 ),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/12/ES z dne 26. februarja 2001 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/440/ES o razvoju železnic v Skupnosti
– having regard to Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/13/ES z dne 26. februarja 2001 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 95/18/ES o izdaji licence prevoznikom v železniškem prometu
– having regard to Directive 2001/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings
UL L 75, 15.3.2001, str.
OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p.26. ,
UL L 75, 15.3.2001, str.
OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p.29. ,
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0275 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0275 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6‑0219/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0219/2007 ),
A. ker naj bi prvi železniški paket kot prvi korak k vzpostavitvi evropskega integriranega železniškega prostora oživil ta sektor in pospešil prehod prevoza blaga s cestnega na železniški promet,
A. whereas the first railway package is intended to revive the rail industry by acting as a first step in the creation of an integrated European railway area, and to speed progress in the modal shift of freight traffic from road to rail,
B. ker je Parlament v prvi obravnavi tretjega železniškega paketa prosil Komisijo, da predloži poročila o učinkih prvega in drugega železniškega paketa,
B. whereas Parliament, at first reading on the third railway package, asked the Commission to submit reports on the impact of the first and second railway packages,
C. ker je v EU prometni sektor odgovoren za 15 do 30 % vseh emisij CO 2 , zaradi česar je treba pospešiti prehod prometa s cest na železnico in celinske plovne poti, ki podnebju ni tako nevaren,
C. whereas the transport sector is responsible for between 15 and 30 % of all the EU’s CO 2 emissions, and whereas accordingly there is a need to boost the shift of traffic from road transport to the railways and inland waterways, which have a less negative impact on the climate,
D. ker so bili ukrepi za prehod na druge vrste prevoza in optimizacijo intermodalnih verig do sedaj potekal nezadovoljivo in ker prvi železniški paket še ni prinesel želenih rezultatov,
D. whereas moves towards a modal shift and to optimising intermodal chains have as yet proved unsatisfactory, and whereas the first railway package has not yet delivered the desired results,
E. ker temeljni pogoji za konkurenčnost in sodelovanje med železniškim, cestnim, zračnim in morskim prometom nujno vplivajo na delovanje vsakega načina prevoza in ker mora biti vprašanje poštene konkurence med temi načini prevoza izhodišče vsake razprave o njihovi učinkovitosti in konkurenčnosti,
E. whereas the underlying conditions for competition and cooperation between rail, road, air and maritime transport inevitably bound to have an impact on the performance of each mode of transport, and whereas any debate on the efficiency and competitiveness within each mode must start from the issue of fair competition between them,
F. ker je okolju škodljivi cestni promet v prednosti, saj se po vsej EU cestnina z določeno najvišjo ceno pobira le na prostovoljni osnovi, večinoma samo na avtocestah in samo za tovorna vozila, brez internalizacije zunanjih stroškov,
F. whereas environmentally harmful road transport is given preferential treatment because the EU-wide system of tolls, with their fixed maximum limit, is levied on a voluntary basis, mostly only on motorways and only for lorries, with no internalisation of external costs,
G. ker cestnina dosega upoštevanja vredne uspehe pri prehodu prometa s ceste na železnico – na primer v Švici – in so za prometno politiko EU zelo zanimive, zlasti zato, ker so izdatki potrošnika zaradi učinkovitejšega cestnega tovornega prometa zrasli samo za 0,5 %,
G. whereas tolls have shown remarkable success in generating a shift of traffic from road to rail – for example in Switzerland - and are an example of the greatest interest for EU transport policy, particularly since the improved efficiency of freight transport by road has increased costs to the consumer by only 0.5%,