natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ker je pristanišče Le Havre zelo pomembno za kontejnerski promet (v tem pristanišču je iztovorjenih 63 % vseh kontejnerjev, ki prispejo v francoska pristanišča) in obstaja velik interes, da se okrepi usklajevanje na osi Pariz-Rouen-Le Havre (reka Sena), bo njegova vključitev omogočila spodbujanje skladnega razvoja gospodarskih dejavnosti in širjenje zaledja na tej osi.
Given the importance of the port of Le Havre for container traffic (63% of all containers handled in French ports) and the benefits of strengthening coordination between the three large ports on the Seine (Paris-Rouen-Le Havre), the inclusion of Le Havre will foster the cohesive development of economic activity and extend the artery’s hinterlands.
To je v skladu s predlogom spremembe 16 poročevalca, skupnim stališčem Sveta in priporočili Evropskega parlamenta v njegovem samoiniciativnem poročilu o prihodnosti politike TEN-T.
This is in line with amendment 16 by the Rapporteur, the Council position and the recommendations made by Parliament in its own‑initiative report on the future of TEN‑T.
Priloga I – točka 5
Annex I - point 5
Priloga I mnenja Sveta ne omenja pomembnih mest v delu med Dunajem in Trstom in je že bila vključena v pot iz ministrskega pisma.
Annex I to the Council position doesn't mention some important cities in the section between Vienna and Trieste and already included in the itinerary by the Ministers letter.
Priloga I – točka 6
Annex I - point 6
Almería-Valencia/Madrid-Zaragoza/Barcelona-Marseille-Lyon-Torino- Videm -Trst/Koper-Ljubljana-Budimpešta-Zahony (madžarsko-ukrajinska meja)
Almeria-Valencia/ Madrid-Zaragoza/Barcelona-Marseille-Lyon-Turin- Udine- Trieste/Koper-Ljubljana-Budapest-Zahony (Hungary-Ukraine border)
Almería-Valencia/ Madrid-Zaragoza/Barcelona-Marseille-Lyon-Torino- Milano-Verona - Padova/Benetke - Trste/Koper-Ljubljana-Budimpešta-Zahony (madžarsko-ukrajinska meja)
Almería-Valencia/ Madrid-Zaragoza/Barcelona-Marseille-Lyon-Turin - Milan-Verona - Padua/Venice - Trieste/Koper-Lubljana-Budapest-Zahony (Hungary-Ukraine border)
Priloga I – točka 8
Annex I - point 8
DE, NL, BE, PL, LT Bremerhaven/Rotterdam/Antwerpen-Aachen/Berlin-Varšava-Terespol (poljsko-beloruska meja)/Kaunas-
DE, NL, BE, PL, LT Bremerhaven/ Rotterdam/Antwerp-Aachen/ Berlin-Warsaw-Terespol (Poland-Belarus border)/Kaunas-
DE, NL, BE, PL, LT, LV, EST Bremerhaven/Rotterdam/Antwerpen-Aachen/Berlin-Varšava-Terespol (poljsko-beloruska meja)/Kaunas -Riga-Talin
DE, NL, BE, PL, LT, LV , EST Bremerhaven/ Rotterdam/ Antwerp-Aachen/ Berlin-Warsaw-Terespol (Poland-Belarus border)/Kaunas -Riga-Tallinn
Priloga I – opomba 1
Annex I - footnote 1
Znak "/" pomeni alternativne poti.
1 "/" means alternative routes.
V skladu s prednostnimi projekti TEN-T bo treba smeri 4 in 6 v prihodnje dopolniti s projektom št. 16, tovorno osjo Sines/Algeciras-Madrid-Pariz, ki vključuje osrednjo povezavo prek Pirenejev s predorom na majhni višini.
In line with the TEN-T priority projects, routes 4 and 6 should in the future be completed by Project 16, the Sines/Algeciras-Madrid-Paris freight axis which takes in the central Pyrenees crossing via a low elevation tunnel.
Priloga se črta
Annex deleted
Hkrati je obseg prometa, še zlasti tovornega, stalno naraščal.
In parallel, transport growth has been constant, especially in the freight sector.
Te težave je mogoče pojasniti s spremembami značaja prometnega sektorja v zadnjem desetletju: uvedeni so bili trije železniški svežnji za odprtje nacionalnih trgov, vendar ni prišlo do zadostne uskladitve in vzpostavitve sinergij med nacionalnimi železniškimi sistemi.
The changing context in the transport sector in the last decade can partly explain these difficulties, with the growing opening of the national rail markets with three railway packages without sufficient harmonisation and synergies between national rail systems.
Trg železniškega tovornega prometa se sedaj sooča z izzivom izboljšanja kakovosti svojih storitev, saj je zaradi pomanjkljivosti v slabšem položaju v tekmi z drugimi vrstami tovornega prometa.
The rail freight market has now to face the challenge of the improvement of its quality of service, because of a lack of compliance which handicaps it in its competition against other modes of transport in the freight transport.
Predlog Komisije za oblikovanje evropskih tovornih koridorjev
The Proposal of the Commission to create European freight corridors
Kot odgovor na ta izziv je Komisija v okrepitev tovornega prometa decembra 2008 predložila uredbo o oblikovanju konkurenčnega železniškega omrežja za konkurenčen tovorni promet.
In order to face this challenge, the Commission promoted the idea to give a better treatment to the transport of goods by proposing in December 2008 a regulation creating a competitive rail network for competitive freight.
Predlog Komisije je namenjen oblikovanju pravil za mednarodne železniške tovorne koridorje, še zlasti pravil v zvezi z njihovo izbiro in upravno organizacijo.
The Commission's proposal aimed at organising and determining rules for international rail freight corridors, especially concerning their selection and their administrative organisation.
Predlog predvideva merila, po katerih države članice izbirajo tovorne koridorje, in določa njihove upravne organe.
It presented the criteria for the selection of freight corridors by Member States and defined their governance bodies.
Namenjeni bi morali biti spodbujanju korenitega razvoja železniškega tovornega prometa na osnovi socialno-ekonomske analize.
These corridors should aim at allowing a significant development of rail freight traffic, on the basis of a socio-economic analysis.
Spodbuja tudi usklajeno delovanje upravljavcev infrastrukture pri dodeljevanju poti, upravljanju prometa in naložbah vzdolž koridorja.
It promoted also the harmonised management between infrastructure managers concerning the allocation of paths, the traffic management and the investments along this corridor.
Predlog vsebuje pravila in instrumente v zvezi z upravljanjem tovornih koridorjev, kot je na primer oblikovanje sistema „vse na enem mestu” za vloge za vlakovne poti.
It proposed the rules and instruments related to the management of the freight corridor, like the creation of a one-stop-shop for the requests for train paths.
Upravni organ tudi opredeli posebno kategorijo, imenovano „prednostni tovor“, za tovor, ki ga je treba zelo hitro prepeljati.
A specific category called "priority freight" for very time-sensitive good should also have been defined by the governance body.
Upravljavci infrastrukture oblikujejo in objavijo pravila za upravljanje prometa, še posebej pravila za prednostni tovor v primeru motenj prometa.
Rules for the traffic management, especially rules of priority for the "priority freight" in case of traffic disruption, were drawn up and published by the infrastructure managers.
Evropski parlament je opravil prvo obravnavo predloga aprila 2009 in je v glavnem podprl cilj Komisije, naj se prek vzpostavitve koridorjev na ozemlju Evropske unije oblikuje konkurenčno železniško omrežje za prevoz blaga.
The European Parliament adopted its first reading in April 2009 on this proposal, which supported largely the objective of the Commission to create a competitive rail freight network through the creation of corridors across the European Union.
Izraz „prednostni tovor“ smo zamenjali in uvedli večjo prožnost glede prednostnih pravil za dodeljevanje vlakovnih poti, v skladu s potrebami trga in načeli, ki jih oblikuje upravni organ.
The term "priority freight" was replaced and more flexibility in the functioning of the rules of priority and in the allocation of train paths was introduced in order to be in line with the market needs and with regulation principles established by the governance body.
Parlament je prav tako uvedel nekaj sprememb pri organizaciji organov za upravljanje koridorjev, v obliki sodelovanja železniških podjetij v posvetovalni vlogi in ustanovitve izvršnega odbora s člani iz držav članic.
The Parliament introduced as well some changes in the organisation of the governance bodies of the corridors with the participation of railways undertakings on a consultative basis and the creation of an executive board with national members.
Stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi
The Council's position at first reading
Svet je junija 2009 dosegel politični dogovor in ga uradno sprejel 22. februarja 2010.
A political agreement was reached in the Council in June 2009 and was formally adopted on 22 February 2010.
Ob začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe je bilo treba nekaj določb v besedilu prilagoditi novim pravilom komitologije.
With the entry into force the Lisbon Treaty, several provisions contained in the text needed to be adapted regarding the comitology.
Glavna sprememba osnutka uredbe, ki jo je sprejel Svet, se nanaša na vzpostavitev začetnih tovornih koridorjev, naštetih v novi prilogi k besedilu v treh oziroma izjemoma v petih letih po začetku veljavnosti uredbe.
The main change in the draft Regulation agreed in the Council concerns the establishment of initial freight corridors listed in a new annex to the text at the latest three or exceptionally five years after its entry into force.
Predlagani so tudi postopki vzpostavljanja dodatnih koridorjev in preoblikovanje oziroma širjenje obstoječih.
Procedures for the creation of additional corridors or for the modification or prolongation of existing corridors are also proposed.
Stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi skuša uskladiti rezerviranje zmogljivosti za tovorni promet z rednim potniškim prevozom, saj v osnutku uredbe o tovornem prevozu omenja tudi potrebe potniškega prevoza po zmogljivostih.
The Council's position at first reading tries to conciliate the capacity reservation for freight trains with the normal passenger transport, by mentioning the need for capacity of passenger transport in a draft Regulation dealing with freight transport.
V besedilu Sveta je črtana pravica prosilcev, ki niso železniška podjetja, prositi za vlakovne poti za prevoz blaga, in jo dopušča le v primerih, kjer vlakovne poti ležijo na ozemljih držav članic, katerih zakonodaja take vloge dovoljuje.
Council's text deleted the right of applicants other than railway undertakings to request train paths for freight transport, allowing it only if these paths are located in Member States where national law accepts those requests.
Glede organizacije koridorjev je Svet predlagal razdelitev upravnega organa koridorja na upravni odbor, ki ga sestavljajo upravljavci infrastrukture, in izvršni odbor, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic in ima v primerjavi s stališčem Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi več pristojnosti.
On the organisation of the corridors, the Council proposed to divide the administrative body managing the corridor in a management board, constituted by infrastructure managers, and an executive board, constituted by representatives of Member States, having additional powers compared to the Parliament's first reading.
Pristojnosti sistema vse na enem mestu se je znatno zmanjšala in njegova vloga skrčila na informativno.
The competences of one-stop-shop are significantly weakened, reducing its role to an information role.
Mnenje poročevalca
Rapporteur's views
Poročevalec predlaga priporočila, katerih namen je prilagoditi stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi tako, da se spet upoštevajo stališča Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi.
Your rapporteur proposes a recommendation which intends to modify Council's position at first reading by taking into account the first reading of the Parliament.
Nekateri elementi skupnega stališča so združljivi s stališči Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi, na primer ustanovitev izvršnega odbora, ki jo je predlagal že Evropski parlament.
Some of the aspects of the Common position are compatible with Parliament's first reading, like for example the creation of an executive board, which was already proposed by European Parliament.
Poročevalec je skušal v stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi ponovno vnesti parlamentarne spremembe v zvezi s sodelovanjem železniških podjetij v upravnem odboru, o načrtih naložb in dostopu pooblaščenih prevoznikov do koridorjev.
Your rapporteur also tried to reintroduce parliamentary amendments in the Council's position at first reading on the participation of railways undertaking in the management board, the investment plans, and the access of the authorised applicants to the corridors.
Še pomembneje pa je, da je poročevalec ponovno vnesel navedbe posebne kategorije tovora („hitri tovor“), ki jih je Svet črtal, ter nekatere parlamentarne spremembe o dodeljevanju zmogljivosti vlakovnih poti, ki mora temeljiti na predhodni oceni.
More importantly, your rapporteur reintroduced some references to the specific category of freight, ("facilitated freight") which was deleted by the Council, as well as some amendments of the Parliament on the allocation of capacity of train paths, which should be decided accordingly to a preliminary evaluation.
Na koncu poročevalec predlaga nekaj novih zapisov besedila v stališču Sveta v prvi obravnavi:
Finally, your rapporteur proposed some new wording in the Council's position at first reading:
- kar zadeva sistem vse na enem mestu, poročevalec meni, da je to bistvena določba uredbe, in predlaga nov zapis besedila, s katerim bi okrepili njegovo vlogo pri postopkih dodeljevanja vlakovnih poti,
- On the one-stop-shop, your rapporteur considers it as a key provision in the Regulation and proposes some wording to reinforce its use in the allocation process for train paths;
- kar zadeva izbiranje koridorjev, so vnesene nekatere prilagoditve glede predstavitve meril, oziroma so prenesene iz Priloge II v nov člen.
- On the selection of corridors, some adaptations are made on the presentation of the criteria, which are transferred from the Annex II to a new article.
Roki za potrditev seznama koridorjev in izbira nadaljnjih koridorjev bi morali biti krajši, kot jih predlaga Svet, da bo Uredba lahko hitreje uveljavljena,
The validation of the list of corridors and the selection of further corridors should be made according to a shorter timetable as the one proposed by Council, in order to allow a more rapid implementation of the Regulation;
- osnutek priporočila vsebuje tudi nekaj preoblikovanja besedila, ki prilagajajo prejšnje komitološke postopke delegiranih aktov ureditvi v Lizbonski pogodbi.
- The draft recommendation includes as well some wording on adapting the former comitology procedures to the delegated acts, as provided by the Lisbon Treaty.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktiv 1998/26/ES, 2002/87/ES, 2003/6/ES, 2003/41/ES, 2003/71/ES, 2004/39/ES, 2004/109/ES, 2005/60/ES, 2006/48/ES, 2006/49/ES in 2009/65/ES glede pristojnosti Evropskega bančnega organa, Evropskega organa za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine ter Evropskega organa za vrednostne papirje in trge
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 1998/26/EC, 2002/87/EC, 2003/6/EC, 2003/41/EC, 2003/71/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2004/109/EC, 2005/60/EC, 2006/48/EC, 2006/49/EC and 2009/65/EC in respect of the powers of the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority
PE 439.086v01-00
PE 439.086v04-00
Besedilo, zapisano v navadnem poševnem tisku , označuje tehničnim službam namenjeni del besedila s predlaganimi popravki, ki se upoštevajo pri pripravi končnega besedila (na primer, očitne napake ali izpustitve v zadevni jezikovni različici).
The heading for any amendment to an existing act that the draft act seeks to amend includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend.
O teh popravkih odločajo pristojne tehnične službe.
Passages in an existing act that Parliament wishes to amend, but that the draft act has left unchanged, are highlighted in bold Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make in such passages are indicated thus: [...].
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve .........................................................................200
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ....................................................216
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0576 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0576 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 44, člena 47(2) ter členov 55 in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0251/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 44, Article 47(2) and Articles 55 and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0251/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Posledice začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja ( KOM(2009)0665 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled "Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures" ( COM(2009)0665 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in člena 50, člena 53(1) ter členov 62 in 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 50, Article 53(1) and Articles 62 and 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0163/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7‑0163/2010 ),
(1) Med finančno krizo v obdobju 2007/2008 so se pokazale pomembne pomanjkljivosti pri finančnem nadzoru v posameznih primerih in v zvezi s celotnim finančnim sistemom.
(1) The financial crisis in 2007/2008 exposed important shortcomings in financial supervision, both in particular cases and in relation to the financial system as a whole.
Nadzorni modeli na nacionalni ravni zaostajajo za integriranostjo in medsebojno povezanostjo evropskih finančnih trgov, na katerih veliko finančnih podjetij posluje čezmejno ter ponuja finančne storitve podjetjem in potrošnikom .
National supervisory models have lagged behind the integrated and interconnected reality of European financial markets, in which many financial firms operate across borders and offer financial services to businesses and consumers .
Med krizo so se pokazale pomanjkljivosti na področju sodelovanja, usklajevanja, enotne uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti in zaupanja med nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi.
The crisis exposed shortcomings in the area of cooperation, coordination, consistent application of Community law and trust between national supervisors.
Nadzorni modeli na nacionalni ravni zaostajajo za integriranostjo in medsebojno povezanostjo evropskih finančnih trgov, na katerih veliko finančnih podjetij posluje čezmejno.
Nationally-based supervisory models have lagged behind the integrated and interconnected reality of European financial markets, in which many financial firms operate across borders.
Med krizo so se pokazale pomanjkljivosti na področju sodelovanja, usklajevanja, enotne uporabe zakonodaje Unije in zaupanja med nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi.
The crisis exposed shortcomings in the area of cooperation, coordination, consistent application of Union law and trust between national supervisors.
(1a) Že dolgo pred nastopom finančne krize je Parlament redno pozival h krepitvi resnično enakih pogojev za vse udeležence na evropski ravni in obenem opozarjal na pomembne pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru Unije nad vedno bolj integriranimi finančnimi trgi (v svojih resolucijah z dne 13. aprila 2000 o sporočilu Komisije akcijski načrt 1 , v svoji resoluciji z dne 25. novembra 2002 o pravilih bonitetnega nadzora v Evropski uniji 2 , v svoji resoluciji z dne 11. julija o politiki finančnih storitev (2005-2010) – Bela knjiga 3 , v svoji resoluciji z dne 23. septembra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o hedge skladih in skladih zasebnega kapitala 4 , v svoji resoluciji z dne 9. oktobra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o nadaljevanju Lamfalussyjevega procesa: prihodnja struktura nadzora 5 , v svoji resoluciji z dne 22. aprila 2009 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II) 6 ter v svoji resoluciji z dne 23. aprila 2009 o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o bonitetnih agencijah 7 ).
( 1a ) L ong before the financial crisis the European Parliament was already calling regularly for the reinforcement of a true level playing - field for all actors at the European level while pointing out important failures in the Union 's supervision of ever more integrated financial markets ( in its resolutions of 13 April 2000 on the Commission communication on implementing the framework for financial markets: Action Plan 1 , of 25 November 2002 on prudential supervision rules in the European Union 2 , of 11 July 2007 on financial services policy (2005-2010) – White Paper 3 , of 23 September 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on h edge funds and p rivate e quity 4 , of 9 October 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on Lamfalussy follow-up: future structure of supervision 5 , of 22 April 2009 on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance ( Solvency II ) 6 and of 23 April 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the Council on C redit R ating A gencies 7 ).
1 UL L 40, 7.2.2001, str.
1 OJ C 40, 7.2.2001, p.
2 UL C 25 E, 29.1.2004, str.
2 OJ C 25 E, 29.1.2004, p.
3 UL C 175 E, 10.7.2008, str. xx.
3 OJ C 175 E, 10.7.2008, p. xx.
6 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0251 .
6 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0251 .
7 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0279 .
7 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0279 .
(4) Evropski svet je v svojih sklepih z dne 19. junija 2009 priporočil vzpostavitev evropskega sistema finančnih nadzornih organov, ki ga sestavljajo trije novi evropski nadzorni organi.
(4) The European Council, in its conclusions of 19 June 2009, recommended that a European System of Financial Supervisors, comprising three new European Supervisory Authorities, be established.
Sistem mora biti usmerjen k izboljšanju kakovosti in usklajenosti nacionalnega nadzora, krepitvi nadzora nad čezmejnimi skupinami ter pripravi enotnega evropskega pravilnika, ki se uporablja za vse finančne institucije na notranjem trgu.
The system should be aimed at upgrading the quality and consistency of national supervision, strengthening oversight of cross border groups and establishing a European single rule book applicable to all financial institutions in the Internal Market .
Evropski svet je poudaril, da morajo imeti evropski nadzorni organi tudi pooblastila za nadzor nad bonitetnimi agencijami, in Komisijo pozval, naj pripravi konkretne predloge, kako bi lahko evropski sistem finančnih nadzornih organov imel pomembno vlogo v kriznih razmerah.
It emphasised that the European Supervisory Authorities should also have supervisory powers for credit rating agencies and invited the Commission to prepare concrete proposals on how the European System of Financial Supervisors could play a strong role in crisis situations.
Sistem mora biti usmerjen k izboljšanju kakovosti in usklajenosti nacionalnega nadzora, krepitvi nadzora nad čezmejnimi skupinami, pripravi enotnega evropskega pravilnika, ki se uporablja za vse finančne institucije na notranjem trgu , ter zagotovitvi ustrezne uskladitve meril in metodologije, ki jih bodo pristojni organi uporabljali za ocenjevanje tveganja kreditnih institucij .
The system should be aimed at upgrading the quality and consistency of national supervision, strengthening oversight of cross border groups , establishing a European single rule book applicable to all financial institutions in the i nternal m arket and ensuring adequate harmonisation of criteria and methodology to be applicable by the competent authorities to assess the risk of credit institutions .