natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Klaus-Heiner Lehne (predsednik), Raffaele Baldassarre, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Marielle Gallo, Rainer Wieland, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Luigi Berlinguer, Françoise Castex, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Zbigniew Ziobro, Piotr Borys, Kurt Lechner, Angelika Niebler, József Szájer, Sajjad Karim. priporoča vašemu odboru kot pristojnemu odboru, naj nadaljuje preučevanje omenjenega predloga v skladu s svojimi predlogi in členom 87.
Klaus-Heiner Lehne (Chair), Raffaele Baldassarre, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Marielle Gallo, Rainer Wieland, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Luigi Berlinguer, Françoise Castex, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Zbigniew Ziobro, Piotr Borys, Kurt Lechner, Angelika Niebler, József Szájer, Sajjad Karim. , recommends that your Committee, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in keeping with its suggestions and in accordance with Rule 87.
POSVETOVALNA DELOVNA SKUPINA
CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY
Bruselj, 4. junij 2010
Brussels, 4 June 2010
Ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, še posebej njegove devete točke, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 6. maja 2007, da bi preučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 6 May 2010 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna različica obravnavanega besedila. je posvetovalna delovna skupina na podlagi preverjanja predloga Uredbe Sveta, ki prenavlja Uredbo Sveta (Euratom) št. 3954/87 z dne 22. decembra 1987 o najvišji dovoljeni stopnji radioaktivnega onesnaženja živil in krme po jedrski nesreči ali kateri koli drugi radiološki nevarnosti, Uredbo Komisije (Euratom) št. 944/89 z dne 12. aprila 1989 o določitvi maksimalne dovoljene ravni radioaktivne kontaminacije manj pomembnih živil po jedrski nesreči ali kakršni koli drugi radiološki nesreči in Uredbo Komisije (Euratom) št. 770/90 z dne 29. marca 1990 o določitvi najvišje dovoljene ravni radioaktivne kontaminacije krme po jedrski nesreči ali kakršni koli drugi radiološki nevarnosti, soglasno sklenila, da predlog ne vsebuje bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so bile opredeljene kot take.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a Council regulation recasting Council Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87 of 22 December 1987 laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency, Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 944/89 of 12 April 1989 laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination in minor foodstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency, and Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 770/90 of 29 March 1990 laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga Uredbe Sveta o najvišji dovoljeni stopnji radioaktivnega onesnaženja živil in krme po jedrski nesreči ali kateri koli drugi radiološki nevarnosti (prenovitev) ( KOM(2010)0184 – C7‑0137/2010 – 2010/0098(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a Council regulation on laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency (recast)( COM(2010)0184 – C7‑0137/2010 – 2010/0098(CNS) )
v pismu z dne 11. novembra 2010 ste v skladu s členom 37(2) poslovnika od Odbora za pravne zadeve zahtevali mnenje o tem, ali je člen 31 Pogodbe Euratom primerna pravna podlaga za zgoraj omenjeni predlog Komisije in ali ni morda bolj primeren člen 168(4)(b) PDEU.
By letter of 11 November 2010 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 37(2) to consider whether Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty (EAEC) was the appropriate legal basis for the above Commission proposal and whether it might not be more appropriate to opt for Article 168(4)(b) TFEU.
Odbor je to vprašanje obravnaval na seji 22. novembra 2010.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 22 November 2010.
Komisija je 27. aprila 2010 sprejela predlog za prenovitev uredbe Sveta o najvišji dovoljeni stopnji radioaktivnega onesnaženja živil in krme po jedrski nesreči ali kateri koli drugi radiološki nevarnosti (v nadaljevanju: predlog) in ga posredovala Parlamentu po postopku posvetovanja.
The Commission adopted its proposal for a recast of the Council Regulation laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency (hereinafter "the proposal") on 27 April 2010 and submitted it to the Parliament under the consultation procedure.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je predlog obravnaval v skladu s členom 87 poslovnika (prenovitev) in 23. junija 2010 priporočil Odboru za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko (ITRE), naj nadaljuje z obravnavo vsebine predloga.
The Committee on Legal Affairs examined the proposal in accordance with Rule 87 of the Rules of Procedure (recasting) and on 23 June 2010 recommended to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) that it should proceed with its examination of the substance of the proposal.
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko trenutno obravnava vsebino predloga, poročevalec Ivo Belet pa je vložil osnutek poročila (v nadaljevanju: osnutek poročila).
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy is currently examining the substance of the proposal and the rapporteur, Ivo Belet, has tabled a draft report (hereinafter "the Draft Report").
Predsednik odbora ITRE je v pismu z dne 11. novembra zahteval mnenje Odbora za pravne zadeve o izbiri pravne podlage za ta predlog po tem, ko so bili v odboru vloženi predlogi za spremembo pravne podlage.
By letter of 11 November the Chair of ITRE requested the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs as to the choice of the legal basis for the proposal after amendments seeking to alter the legal basis were tabled in that committee.
II - Pravna podlaga
II - Legal basis
Pravna podlaga predloga Komisije
Legal basis of the Commission proposal
Podlaga za predlog je člen 31 (Naslov dve, Poglavje III: Varovanje zdravja) Pogodbe Euratom:
The Proposal is based on Article 31 (Title II Chapter 3: Health and Safety) EAEC, which reads as follows:
„Člen 31
"Article 31
Svet po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom na predlog Komisije, ki mu posreduje mnenja odborov, s kvalificirano večino določi temeljne standarde.“
After consulting the European Parliament the Council shall, on a proposal from the Commission, which shall forward to it the opinions obtained from these Committees, establish the basic standards; the Council shall act by a qualified majority."
„Temeljni standardi“ iz člena 31 so opredeljeni v členu 30 Pogodbe Euratom:
The "basic standards" referred to in Article 31 are defined in Article 30 EAEC, which reads as follows:
(a) najvišje dovoljene doze, ki še zagotavljajo ustrezno varnost;
(a) maximum permissible doses compatible with adequate safety;
(b) največjo dovoljeno izpostavljenost in kontaminacijo,
(b) maximum permissible levels of exposure and contamination;
(c) temeljna načela, ki urejajo zdravstveni nadzor delavcev.“
(c) the fundamental principles governing the health surveillance of workers."
Naj citiramo še člen 32 Pogodbe Euratom:
Finally, Article 32 EAEC provides as follows:
„Člen 32
"Article 32
Komisija mora preučiti vsako predloženo zahtevo države članice.“
The Commission shall examine any request made by a Member State ."
Predlagane spremembe pravne podlage
Proposed amendments to the legal basis
Kot je predsednik odbora ITRE zapisal v svojem pismu, poročevalec Ivo Belet predlaga, da bi pravno podlago za predlog zamenjali s sklicevanjem na Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), bolj natančno na njen člen 168(4)(b):
As notified by the Chair of ITRE in his letter, the rapporteur, Ivo Belet, seeks to modify the legal basis of the proposal by replacing it with a reference to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFUE), specifically Article 168(4)(b) thereof, which reads as follows:
„Člen 168
"Article 168
(prejšnji člen 152 PES)
(ex Article 152 TEC)
V obrazložitvi vloženega predloga spremembe poročevalec poudari, da člen 168(4)(b) „ dopušča sprejemanje ukrepov na fitosanitarnem področju.
In the justification to the tabled amendment the rapporteur submits that Article 168(4)(b) " allows for the adoption of measures in the phytosanitary field.
Namen uredbe je določiti najvišje dovoljene stopnje radioaktivnega onesnaženja živil in krme po jedrski nesreči ali nevarnosti, medtem ko je Direktiva Sveta 96/29/Euratom, na podlagi člena 31 Pogodbe Euratom, osredotočena na skupino oseb, ki bi bile lahko izpostavljene morebitnemu radioaktivnemu onesnaženju.
The aim of the regulation is to set maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or emergency, whereas Council Directive 96/29/Euratom, based on Article 31 EAEC, focuses on the group of persons which might be subject to a possible radioactive contamination.
Sklicevanje na pogodbo Euratom je zato neprimerno, saj je glavni namen uredbe zaščita javnega zdravja, ki jo ureja člen 168 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije .“
The reference to the EAEC is therefore inappropriate since the main purpose of the regulation is the protection of public health, which is an area regulated by Article 168 TFUE. "
Treba je opozoriti, da bi sprejetje člena 168 za pravno podlago pomenilo spremembo postopka iz posvetovanja v redni zakonodajni postopek s polnim sodelovanjem Parlamenta.
It should be noted that taking Article 168 as a legal basis would imply a change from consultation to the ordinary legislative procedure with the full participation of Parliament.
Iz sodne prakse Sodišča izhaja, da „ mora izbira pravne podlage ukrepa temeljiti na objektivnih dejstvih, ki jih je mogoče sodno preizkusiti, med temi pa sta zlasti cilj in vsebina ukrepa .“
According to the case-law of the Court of Justice, " the choice of legal basis for a Community measure must rest on objective factors amenable to judicial review, including in particular the aim and the content of the measure "
Nazadnje v zadevi C-411/06 Komisija proti Parlamentu in Svetu (sodba z dne 8. septembra 2009), ki še ni objavljena v Zbirki odločb. .
See most recently Case C-411/06 Commission v Parliament and Council (judgment of 8 September 2009), not yet reported in the ECR. .
Zato morata biti cilj in vsebina ukrepa prav tako skladna s področjem uporabe pravne podlage.
Therefore the aim and content of the measure must likewise comply with the scope of the legal basis.
Pogodba Euratom vsebuje določbe, ki Skupnosti omogočajo urejanje rabe jedrske energije s strani držav članic, zlasti kar zadeva zaščitne ukrepe in varovanje zdravja.
The EAEC contains provisions allowing the Community to regulate the use of nuclear energy by the Member States, in particular as regards nuclear safeguards and health protection.
Člen 2(b) Pogodbe ESAE navaja, da Skupnost „ postavlja enotne varnostne standarde za varovanje zdravja delavcev in prebivalstva ter zagotavlja njihovo uporabo “.
Pursuant to Article 2(b) EAEC, the Community shall, as provided in that Treaty, " establish uniform safety standards to protect the health of workers and of the general public and ensure that they are applied ".
Poglavje III Naslova dve Pogodbe, ki zadeva varovanje zdravja, vsebuje določbe v zvezi s temeljnimi standardi o varstvu pred ionizirajočimi sevanji.
Chapter 3 of Title II of the Treaty, concerning health protection, contains provisions concerning basic standards with regard to protection against ionising radiation.
Predlagana uredba določa postopek ugotavljanja najvišjih dovoljenih stopenj radioaktivnega onesnaženja za živila in krmo, ki jo je mogoče dati na trg neposredno po jedrski nesreči ali kateri koli drugi radiološki nevarnosti, ki lahko povzroči ali je povzročila znatno radioaktivno onesnaženje živil in krme
The proposed regulation lays down the procedure for determining the maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs which may be placed on the market following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency which is likely to lead to or has led to significant radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs
Člen 1(1) predloga. .
Article 1(1) of the proposal. .
Obenem prilogi I in III določata najvišje dovoljene stopnje onesnaženja živil in krme.
At the same time, Annexes I and III set out the maximum permitted levels of contamination of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs.
Sprejeta naj bi bila kot uredba po pogodbi Euratom.
It is to be adopted as a Euratom regulation.
Sodišče je enkrat že pregledalo izbiro pravne podlage za Uredbo Sveta št. 3954/87, ki je predmet tega predloga za prenovo, in takrat odločilo: „ Namen uredbe št. 3954/87 je postaviti enotne varnostne standarde za varovanje zdravja delavcev in prebivalstva, kakor določa člen 2(b) Pogodbe Euratom.
The Court of Justice has already examined on one occasion the choice of legal basis for Council Regulation No 3954/87, which is the subject of the current proposal for a recast and held that: " The purpose of Regulation No 3954/87 is to establish uniform safety standards to protect health of workers and of the general public, as provided in Article 2(b) of the EAEC Treaty.
Določa najvišje dovoljene stopnje radioaktivnega onesnaženja živil in krme in od Komisije zahteva, naj v primeru jedrske nesreče ali drugega primera radiološke nevarnosti ter če to zahtevajo okoliščine, sprejme uredbo za uporabo teh najvišjih dovoljenih stopenj.
It lays down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs and requires the Commission to adopt, in the event of a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency, if the circumstances so require, a regulation rendering applicable those maximum permissible levels.
Ker je njen namen zaščita prebivalstva pred nevarnostmi radioaktivno onesnaženih živil in krme, jo je bilo mogoče sprejeti na podlagi člena 31 Pogodbe Euratom. “
Since its purpose is to protect the population against the dangers arising from foodstuffs and feedingstuffs which have undergone radioactive contamination it was possible for it to be adopted on the basis of Article 31 of the EAEC Treaty. "
V tem primeru je moralo Sodišče odločiti, ali ne bi bila primernejša pravna podlaga člen 100a
In that case, the Court was asked to decide whether the more appropriate legal basis would have not been Article 100a
Ker je ta prepoved le eden od pogojev za učinkovitost izvajanja najvišjih dovoljenih stopenj, je uskladitev pogojev za prost pretok blaga v Skupnosti z izogibanjem sprejetju enostranskih ukrepov posameznih držav članic samo stranski učinek uredbe.
In fact as that prohibition is only one condition for the effectiveness of the application of maximum permitted levels, the regulation has only the incidental effect of harmonising the conditions for the free movement of goods within the Community by avoiding the adoption of unilateral measures by the various Member States. "
“ Sodišče je ugotovilo tudi: „ Sklepati gre torej, da je namen omenjenih členov zagotoviti dosledno in učinkovito varovanje zdravja prebivalstva pred nevarnostmi ionizirajočih sevanj, ne glede na njihov izvor in kategorije oseb, izpostavljenih takšnim sevanjem. “
The Court stated also that: "The indications are rather that the purpose of the articles referred to is to ensure the consistent and effective protection of the health of the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiations, whatever their source and whatever the categories of persons exposed to such radiations ".
I-11282, odstavek 80. , kjer je poudarilo, da „ je Sodišče odklonilo omejevalno razlago člena 30 in naslednjih členov Pogodbe Euratom, ki jo je predlagal Parlament.
C-29/99 Commission v Council [2002] ECR 2002 I-11282, paragraph 80. to stress that " the Court refused to uphold the restrictive interpretation of Article 30 et seq.
Sodišče je opozorilo tudi, da mora razlaga „ upoštevati cilj iz preambule Pogodbe Euratom, in sicer 'vzpostaviti varnostne razmere, s katerimi bo odpravljena nevarnost za življenje in zdravje prebivalstva' “
The Court also pointed that the interpretation " must be carried out in the light of the objective, set out in the preamble to the EAEC, to 'create the conditions of safety necessary to eliminate hazards to the life and health of the public' "
Prav tam, odstavek 75. .
Ibid, , paragraph 75. .
Vendar je mogoče glede na to, da člen 168 PDEU zadeva javno zdravje in pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju vseh politik in dejavnosti Unije zahteva zagotavljanje visoke ravni varovanja zdravja ljudi, trditi, da bi ga bilo dejansko treba uporabiti kot pravno podlago za sprejetje zadevnega ukrepa.
Nevertheless, given the fact that Article 168 TFEU concerns public health and requires a high level of human health protection to be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Union policies and activities, it can be argued that it should in fact be used as a legal basis for the adoption of the measure in question.
Pravna služba Parlamenta je v svojem dopisu z dne 18. novembra 2010 navedla več tovrstnih argumentov, v zaključku pa soglašala z uporabo člena 168(4)(b) PDEU.
The Parliament's Legal Service in its note of 18 November 2010 develops several arguments in this regard before concluding in favour of Article 168(4)(b) TFEU.
Prvič, dejstvo, da je Sodišče zavrnilo prejšnje pozive za pravno podlago v zvezi z notranjim trgom in potrdilo člen 31 Pogodbe Euratom kot edino veljavno pravno podlago, ne izključuje možnosti novega pristopa Sodišča.
First of all, the fact that the Court rejected previous claims arguing for a legal basis concerning the internal market and confirmed Article 31 EAEC as the sole valid legal basis does not preclude a new approach by the Court.
Dejansko pravna podlaga iz predloga spremembe, ki ga je vložil poročevalec, v času sprejetja sodbe v zadevi C-70/88 sploh še ni obstajala.
In fact, the legal basis referred to in the amendment tabled by the rapporteur did not exist at the time of the ruling in Case C-70/88.
Člen 168(4)(b) je bil uveden šele z Maastrichtsko pogodbo leta 1992
Article 168(4)(b) TFEU was only introduced by the Maastricht Treaty in 1992
Takrat je bil to člen 129(4)(b) Pogodbe ES, ki je bil spremenjen z Amsterdamsko pogodbo in preštevilčen v člen 152(4)(b) PES. .
At the time it was Article 129(4)(b) of the EC Treaty, amended by the Amsterdam Treaty and renumbered Article 152(4)(b) TEC. .
Drugič, treba je opozoriti, da omemba jedrske nesreče ali nevarnosti še ne pomeni nujno pravne podlage v Pogodbi Euratom.
Secondly, it must also be recalled that the simple fact that a nuclear accident or emergency is involved does not automatically imply a legal basis in the EAEC.
Sodišče je tako v zadevi C-62/88
The Court thus ruled in Case C-62/88
Zadeva C-62/88 Grčija proti Svetu [1990] ZOdl.
Case C-62/88 Greece v Council [1990] ECR I-1527, paragraphs 16-18. concerning Regulation 3955/87
Te določbe iz poglavja o varovanju zdravja, ki je del naslova dva Pogodbe Euratom o določbah za spodbujanje napredka na področju jedrske energije, so namenjene varovanju javnega zdravja v jedrskem sektorju.
Those provisions, which appear in a chapter entitled "Health and Safety", which forms part of the second title of the EAEC Treaty entitled "Provisions for the encouragement of progress in the field of nuclear energy", are intended to provide for the protection of public health in the nuclear sector.
Njihov namen ni urejanje trgovine med Skupnostjo in tretjimi državami. “
They are not intended to regulate trade between the Community and non-member countries. "
Tretjič, predlog sam v peti uvodni izjavi omenja ukrepe, ki so bili sprejeti, da bi „ zagotovili, da se nekateri kmetijski proizvodi smejo uvoziti v Unijo le v skladu s skupnimi ureditvami, ki varujejo zdravje prebivalstva “.
Thirdly, the proposal itself refers in recital 5 to a series of measures " adopted to ensure that certain agricultural products are only introduced into the Union according to the common arrangements which safeguard the health of population ".
Omenjeni ukrepi vključujejo uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1707/86
The measures referred to include Council Regulations (EEC) No 1707/86
Ta uredba se sicer sklicuje na Pogodbo EGS, vendar se ne sklicuje na kakšen določen člen te pogodbe. , (EGS) št. 3020/86
This regulation refers to the EEC Treaty; however, it does not refer to any particular article thereof. , (EEC) No 3020/86
Ta uredba se sicer sklicuje na Pogodbo EGS, vendar se ne sklicuje na kakšen določen člen te pogodbe. in (EGS) št. 3955/87.
This regulation refers to the EEC Treaty; however, it does not refer to any particular article thereof. , (EEC) No 3955/87.
Ti pravni akti potrjujejo, da pravni odgovor na jedrsko nesrečo ne zahteva nujno akta, ki temelji na Pogodbi Euratom.
These legal acts confirm that a legal response to a nuclear accident does not necessarily call for an act based on the EAEC.
Končno, člen 168(4)(b) PDEU bi bil lahko dejansko ustrezna pravna podlaga za predlog.
Finally, Article 168(4)(b) TFEU could indeed provide an adequate legal basis for the proposal.
Člen zahteva, da imajo na njegovi podlagi sprejeti ukrepi za „ neposredni cilj varovanje javnega zdravja “, kar nedvomno drži v primeru tega predloga, ki „ določa največje dovoljene stopnje (...) onesnaženja živil in krme “
This article requires that the measures adopted on its basis should " have as their direct objective the protection of public health ", which is undoubtedly true in the case of the present proposal, which " lays down maximum permitted levels of (...) contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs "
Združene zadeve C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 in C-194-04 ABNA e.a.
See Joined Cases C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04 ABNA e.a.
Dodaten argument v podporo temu stališču je člen 6, ki določa, da so lahko v prometu le živila in krma, ki so v skladu z najvišjimi dovoljenimi stopnjami, določenimi v uredbi.
One additional argument in support of this position is Article 6, which prescribes that only foodstuffs and feedingstuffs in compliance with the maximum permitted levels laid down in the regulation are to be placed on the market.
Tudi opredelitev živil in krme, iz člena 1(2) predloga („ proizvodi, namenjeni človeški prehrani v nepredelani ali predelani obliki “ in „ proizvodi, namenjeni prehrani živali “) podpira namen predloga.
The definition of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs laid down in Article 1(2) of the proposal (" products which are intended for human consumption either immediately or after processing " and " products which are intended only for animal nutrition", respectively) underlines the purpose of the proposal.
Sledi seznam nekaterih pravnih aktov, sprejetih na podlagi člena 168(4)(b) PDEU:
Below is a list of some legal acts adopted under Article 168(4)(b) TFEU: