natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar pa v okviru sporazuma s Svetom in Komisijo, da se doseže soglasje v prvem branju, da ne bi ogrozili potrebnega in nujnega sprejemanja podaljšanja prehodnega obdobja, predlaga poročevalec naslednje spremembe predloga Komisije:
However, the rapporteur, in view of an agreement with the Council and the Commission to reach a first reading agreement in order not to endanger the necessary and urgent adoption of the extension of the transitional period, suggests the following changes to the Commission proposal:
· podaljšanje prehodnega obdobja na štiri leta, namesto tri (do 14. maja 2014, namesto 14. maja 2013) za zagotovitev, da se pravočasno ocenijo vsi biocidni pripravki, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, pri čemer se vzpostavi trg, ki ga uravnavajo usklajena pravila;
· the extension of the transitional period for four years, instead of three (until 14 May 2014 instead of 14 May 2013) so as to make sure that all biocidal products containing active substances are evaluated in due time creating a market regulated by harmonised rules;
· na drugi strani je omejitev možnosti za nadaljnje podaljšanje rokov za preostalo dokumentacijo s postopkom komitologije za največ dve leti, da ne pride do neskončnih zamud v celotnem postopku;
· on the other hand the limitation to a maximum of two years of the possibility to further extend the deadlines for the remaining dossiers through comitology in order to avoid the possibility to endlessly delay the whole process;
· v skladu z odstavkom 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje predlaga črtanje obveznosti držav članic iz členov, da Komisiji sporočijo besedilo nacionalnih predpisov, s katerimi so prenesle Direktivo, skupaj s korelacijsko tabelo med navedenimi predpisi in to direktivo, ter nadomeščanje s spodbudo držav članic, da v uvodno izjavo vključijo te tabele.
· in line with paragraph 34 of the interinstitutional agreement on better law making, the deletion in the articles of the obligation by Member States to communicate to the Commission the texts of their transpositions into national law including correlation tables between those and the Directive and replacing it by the encouragement of Member States in a recital to draw up such tables.
Končni cilj poročevalca je skupna izjava Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, da so vprašanja o izkoriščanju in varovanju podatkov pomembna vprašanja, ki jih bo treba pri celotnem pregledu Direktive 98/8/ES prednostno obravnavati.
Finally, the rapporteur aims at a joint statement between European Parliament, Council and Commission that the issues of free-riders and data protection are important issues that will need to be addressed as a priority for the full revision of Directive 98/8/EC.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (recast)
Anneli Jäätteenmäki , Odbor za ustavne zadeve
Anneli Jäätteenmäki , Committee on Constitutional Affairs
(*)Pridruženi odbori – člen 47 poslovnika
(*) Associated committee - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
(Recast - Rule 80a of the Rules of Procedue)
(Recast - Rule 80a of the Rules of Procedue)
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA, SVETA IN KOMISIJE 52
ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION 55
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve ........................................................................55
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (*) ..........................57
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................65
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................67
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................70
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................72
MNENJE Odbora za peticije ..........................................................................................81
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions ...............................................................81
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0229 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0229 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 255(2) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0184/2008 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 255(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0184/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 80a in 51 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 80a and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ustavne zadeve, Odbora za pravne zadeve, Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in Odbora za peticije ( A6-077/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, the Committee on Legal Affairs, the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0077/2009 ),
A. ker po mnenju posvetovalne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije predlog ne vsebuje bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v njem opredeljene kot take, in ker je, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih aktov in omenjene spremembe, predlog zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb,
A. whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question does not include any substantive amendments other than those identified as such in the proposal, and whereas, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts together with those amendments, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance,
B. ker se je po mnenju pristojnega odbora Parlamenta Komisija o postopku prenovitve odločila, ne da bi o tem obvestila druge institucije, in brez upoštevanja vsebine in duha resolucije Parlamenta z dne 4. aprila 2006 s priporočili Komisiji o dostopu do besedil institucij glede na člen 192 Pogodbe ES
B. whereas, according to the competent Parliamentary committee, the recasting procedure was decided by the Commission without informing the other institutions and ignoring the letter and the spirit of Parliament's resolution of 4 April 2006 with recommendations to the Commission on access to the institutions' texts under Article 192 of the EC Treaty
151. , katere cilj je bil bistveno spremeniti uredbo 1049/2001; pristojni odbor je celo menil, da Komisija v svojem predlogu ni želela obravnavati zadev, na katere je opozorila zadeva "Turco"
151. , whose aim was to amend substantially Regulation 1049/01, stressing moreover the fact that in its proposal the Commission has even refused to deal with issues such as the ones highlighted in the Court of Justice's landmark "Turco" case
1. odobri predlog Komisije, kakor je bil prilagojen glede na priporočila posvetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (ter s tehničnimi spremembami, ki jih je odobril Odbor za pravne zadeve) in kakor je bil spremenjen v nadaljevanju;
Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission ( and incorporating the technical amendments approved by the Committee on Legal Affairs ) and as amended below;
(3a) S preglednostjo bi se okrepila tudi načela dobrega upravljanja v institucijah EU, kot to določa člen 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije¹ (v nadaljevanju "listina").
(3a) Transparency should also strengthen the principles of good administration in the EU institutions as provided for by Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union 1 ("the Charter").
Ob tem bi bilo treba opredeliti notranje postopke in poiskati ustrezne finančne in človeške vire za uresničitev načela odprtosti v praksi.
Internal procedures should be defined accordingly and adequate financial and human resources should be made available to put the principle of openness into practice.
1 UL C 302, 14.12.2007, str.
1 OJ C 302, 14.12.2007, p.
Pri tem bi bilo treba upoštevati evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
The observation of the European Ombudsman in this respect should be taken into account.
(4) Splošna načela in omejitve iz razlogov javnega ali zasebnega interesa, ki veljajo za pravico javnosti do dostopa do dokumentov, so bila določena v Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001, ki se je začela uporabljati 3. decembra 2001.
(4) The general principles and the limits on grounds of public or private interest governing the public right of access to documents have been laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, which became applicable on 3 December 2001.
Uvodna izjava je smiselno vključena v uvodno izjavo 6.
The content of this recital is inserted in Recital 6.
(5) Prva ocena izvajanja Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 je bila opravljena v poročilu, objavljenem 30. januarja 2004.
(5) A first assessment of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 was made in a report published on 30 January 2004.
Komisija se je 9. novembra 2005 odločila, da sproži postopek za pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001.
On 9 November 2005, the Commission decided to launch the process leading to the review of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
Evropski parlament je v resoluciji, sprejeti 4. aprila 2006, Komisijo pozval, da predloži predlog o spremembi Uredbe.
In a Resolution adopted on 4 April 2006, the European Parliament has invited the Commission to submit a proposal amending the Regulation.
Komisija je 18. aprila 2007 objavila Zeleno knjigo o pregledu Uredbe in sprožila javno posvetovanje.
On 18 April 2007, the Commission published a Green Paper on the review of the Regulation and launched a public consultation.
(6) Namen te uredbe je čim bolj uresničiti pravico dostopa javnosti do dokumentov ter določiti splošna načela in omejitve takega dostopa v skladu s členom 255(2) Pogodbe ES.
(6) The purpose of this Regulation is to give the fullest possible effect to the right of public access to documents and to lay down the general principles and limits on such access in accordance with Article 255(2) of the EC Treaty.
(6) Namen te uredbe je čim bolj uresničiti pravico dostopa javnosti do dokumentov ter določiti splošna načela in omejitve iz razlogov javnega ali zasebnega interesa, ki veljajo za tak dostop v skladu s členom 255(2) Pogodbe ES, hkrati pa upoštevati izkušnje, pridobljene z izvajanjem prvotne uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 in resolucije Evropskega parlamenta s 4. aprila 2006 s priporočili Komisiji o dostopu do besedil institucij glede na člen 192 Pogodbe ES* .
(6) The purpose of this Regulation is to give the fullest possible effect to the right of public access to documents and to lay down the general principles and the limits on the grounds of public or private interest which govern such access in accordance with Article 255(2) of the EC Treaty and taking into account the experience of the initial implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and of the resolution of the European Parliament of 4 April 2006 with recommendations to the Commission on access to the institutions' texts under Article 192 of the EC Treaty*.
Ta uredba ne posega v obstoječe pravice držav članic, sodnih organov ali preiskovalnih teles do dostopa do dokumentov .
This Regulation is without prejudice to existing rights of access to documents for Member States, judicial authorities or investigative bodies .
* OJ C 293 E, 2.12.2006, p.
* OJ C 293 E, 2.12.2006, p.
Uvodne izjave 4, 5, 6 in 22 so smiselno povzete v eni sami uvodni izjavi, ki opredeljuje splošna načela pravice do dostopa do dokumentov EU.
Recital 4-5-6 and 22 have been merged in one recital setting up the general principles of right to access to EU documents.
(8) V skladu s členoma 28(1) in 41(1) Pogodbe EU velja pravica do dostopa tudi za dokumente, ki se nanašajo na skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko ter na policijsko sodelovanje in sodelovanje sodstva v kazenskih zadevah.
(8) In accordance with Articles 28(1) and 41(1) of the EU Treaty, the right of access also applies to documents relating to the common foreign and security policy and to police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
Varnostnim predpisom, ki jih morajo pripraviti posamezne institucije, je še prav posebej namenjena uvodna izjava 15.
Recital 15 is specifically dedicated to security rules to be established by each institution.
(8a) Svet in Komisija delujeta v svoji zakonodajni funkciji, ko ob dejavnem sodelovanju Evropskega parlamenta v obliki uredb, direktiv, okvirnih sklepov ali odločb na podlagi ustreznih določb iz pogodb sprejmeta pravila splošnega obsega – tudi s prenesenimi pristojnostmi – ki so v državah članicah ali zanje pravno zavezujoča.
(8a) The Council and the Commission act in their legislative capacity when, by associating the European Parliament, they adopt , even under delegated power s, rules of general scope which are legally binding in or for the Member States, by means of regulations, directives, framework decisions or decisions, on the basis of the relevant provisions of the Treaties.
(10) Glede razkritja osebnih podatkov je treba vzpostaviti jasno razmerje med to uredbo in Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov.
(10) With regard to the disclosure of personal data , a clear relationship should be established between this Regulation and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data.
Institucije morajo določiti notranje postopke, pri tem pa ustrezno upoštevati priporočilo evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov .
The institutions should define their internal procedures, duly taking into account the recommendation of the European Data Protection Supervisor .
Od sprejetja uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 so sodna praksa Sodiš č a ter odlo č itve in stališ č a, ki s ta jih sprejela evropski varuh č lovekovih pravic in evropski varuh osebnih podatkov, razjasnile razmerje med to uredbo in uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001, v skladu s č imer se mora za zahteve za dokumente, ki vsebujejo osebne podatke, uporabljati uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 ter mora uporaba izjem od pravil, ki dovoljujejo dostop do dokumentov in informacij, za namene varstva osebnih podatkov temeljiti na potrebi po zaš č iti zasebnosti in integritete posameznika.
Since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 the case-law of the Court of Justice and decisions and positions adopted by the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor have clarified the relationship between that Regulation and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, to the effect that it is R egulation (EC) No 1049/2001 which is to be applied to requests for documents containing personal data and that any application of the exceptions to the rules allowing access to documents and information for the purpose of protecting personal data must be based on the need to protect the privacy and integrity of an individual.
Zakonodaja o dostopu do dokumentov se mora izvajati ob ustreznem spoštovanju pravic v zvezi z osebnimi podatki, ki jih obravnavajo uredba 45/2001 in priporočila evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov.
Access to documents legislation should be implemented in due respect of personal data rights covered by Regulation 45/2001 and the recommendations made in this respect by the EDPS.
(12) Širši dostop do dokumentov se zagotovi, kadar institucije delujejo v svoji zakonodajni funkciji, vključno s prenesenimi pristojnostmi, sočasno pa se ohranja učinkovitost postopka odločanja institucij .
(12) Wider access should be granted to documents in cases where the institutions are acting in their legislative capacity, including under delegated powers , while at the same time preserving the effectiveness of the institutions' decision-making process.
(12) V skladu z demokratičnimi načeli iz člena 6(1) Pogodbe EU in sodno prakso Sodišča v zvezi z izvajanjem uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, se širši dostop do dokumentov zagotovi, kadar institucije delujejo v svoji zakonodajni funkciji, vključno s prenesenimi pristojnostmi.
(12) In compliance with the democratic principles outlined in Article 6(1) of the EU Treaty and the case-law of the Court of Justice on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, wider access should be granted to documents in cases where the institutions are acting in their legislative capacity , including under delegated powers .
O boljši praksi pri pripravi zakonodaje, izboljšanih modelih in tehnikah priprave besedil in tehničnih rešitvah za spremljanje življen j skega cikla pripravljalnih dokumentov in njihovega posredovanja institucijam in organom, ki sodelujejo v postopku, se v skladu s to uredbo, objavljeno v Uradnem lisu Evropske unije, dogovorijo Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija.
Better law-making practices, drafting models and techniques as well as technical solutions to track the life-cycle of preparatory documents and to share them with the institutions and bodies associated in the procedure should be agreed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in accordance with this Regulation and published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Prav je, da se načelo dostopa do dokumentov jasno opredeli za različne vrste dokumentov in informacij, ki morajo biti na voljo javnosti, če naj ta sledi zakonodajnim postopkom.
The principle of access to documents should be clearly specified as regards the various kinds of documents and information that need to be available to the public in order to make it possible for the public to follow any legislative procedure.
(12a) Dokumenti v zvezi z nezakonodajnimi postopki, kot so zavezujoči ukrepi brez splošnega obsega ali ukrepi za urejanje notranje organizacije, upravni ali proračunski akti oziroma nezavezujoči dokumenti političnega značaja (kot so sklepi, priporočila ali resolucije), bi morali biti v skladu z načelom dobrega upravljanja iz člena 41 listine dostopni enostavno, čeprav morajo sočasno zagotavljati učinkovitost postopka odločanja v institucijah.
(12a) Documents related to non- legislative procedures, such as binding measures without general scope or measures dealing with internal organisation, administrative or budgetary acts, or non-binding acts of a political nature (such as conclusions, recommendations or resolutions) should be easily accessible in compliance with the principle of good administration outlined in Article 41 of the Charter, while at the same time preserving the effectiveness of the institutions' decision-making process.
Za vsako kategorijo dokumentov bi morala odgovorna institucija in po potrebi druge institucije, ki sodelujejo v postopku, državljanom omogočiti, da se seznanijo s predvidenim potekom notranjih postopkov, s tem, katere organizacijske enote naj bi bile pristojne in v kakšni meri, s postavljenimi roki in uradom, na katerega se lahko obrnejo.
For each category of document the institution responsible and, where appropriate, the other institutions associated should make accessible to citizens the workflow of the internal procedures to be followed, which organisational units could be in charge, as well their remit, the deadlines set and the office to be contacted.
Možni so posebni dogovori z zainteresiranimi stranmi v postopku, tudi če dostop javnosti ne bi bil odobren; institucije morajo ustrezno upoštevati priporočila evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
Special arrangements may be made with the interested parties in the procedure even when public access could not be granted; the institutions should duly take into account the recommendations of the European Ombudsman.
Prav je, da se predpišejo tudi določena splošna načela dostopa javnosti do nezakonodajnih postopkov.
Some general principle of public access to non legislative procedures should also be enforced.
(12b) Institucije bi se morale sporazumeti o skupnih smernicah za evidentiranje notranjih dokumentov, določitev stopnje njihove tajnosti in arhiviranje za zgodovinske potrebe v skladu z načeli iz te uredbe.
(12b) The institutions should agree on common guidelines as to the way in which to register their internal documents, to classify them and to archive them for historical needs according to the principles outlined in this Regulation.
Uredba Sveta (EGS, EURATOM) št. 354/83 z dne 1. februarja 1983 o odpiranju za javnost arhivskega gradiva Evropske gospodarske skupnosti in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo* bi bila potem razveljavljena.
Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom ) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 concerning the opening to the public of the historical archives of the Euro pean Economic Communi ty and the European Atomic Energy Community* should then be repealed.
*UL L 43, 15.2.1983, str.
* OJ L 43, 15.2.1983, p.
Prav je, da se z uredbo opredeli tudi pravni okvir za evidentiranje, določitev stopnje tajnosti in arhiviranje dokumentov.
The present regulation should also constitute the legal framework for registration, classification and archiving of documents.
(13a) Interinstitucionalni register lobistov in drugih zainteresiranih strani je pravo sredstvo za spodbujanje odprtosti in preglednosti zakonodajnega postopka.
(13a) An interinstitutional register of lobbyists and other interested parties is a natural tool for the promotion of openness and transparency in the legislative process.
(14) Da bi zagotovili celovito uporabo te uredbe za vse dejavnosti Unije, morajo v tej uredbi določena načela uporabljati tudi vse agencije, ki jih ustanovijo institucije.
(14) In order to ensure the full application of this Regulation to all activities of the Union, all agencies established by the institutions should apply the principles laid down in this Regulation.
Vse druge institucije EU so pozvane, naj v skladu s členom 1 Pogodbe EU sprejmejo primerljive ukrepe.
All the other EU institutions are invited to adopt comparable measures in accordance with Article 1 of the EU Treaty.
(15) Zaradi izredno občutljive vsebine so nekateri dokumenti deležni posebne obravnave.
(15) On account of their highly sensitive content, certain documents should be given special treatment.
Obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta o vsebini takih dokumentov mora biti urejeno z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom.
Arrangements for informing the European Parliament of the content of such documents should be made through interinstitutional agreement .
(15) Da bi razvili dejavnosti institucij na področjih, ki zahtevajo določeno stopnjo zaupnosti, je prav, da se vzpostavi celovit varnostni sistem za obdelavo tajnih podatkov EU.
(15) In order to develop the activities of the institutions in areas which require a degree of confidentiality, it is appropriate to establish a comprehensive security system covering the treatment of EU classified information.
Izraz "tajni podatki EU" bi moral pomeniti vse podatke in gradivo, katerih nedovoljeno razkritje bi lahko v različni meri škodovalo interesom EU ali eni ali več državam članicam, bodisi da taki podatki izvirajo iz EU ali prihajajo iz držav članic, tretjih držav ali mednarodnih organizacij.
The term "EU classified" should mean any information and material the unauthorised disclosure of which could cause varying degrees of prejudice to EU interests, or to one or more of its Member States, whether such information originates within the EU or is received from Member States, third countries or international organisations.