natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V ta namen mora dovoljenje za prebivanje ES rezidenta za daljši čas, ki je bilo dodeljeno upravičencem do mednarodne zaščite, vsebovati opombo z informacijo glede dejstva, da je mednarodno zaščito imetniku dovoljenja dodelila država članica.
For this purpose the long-term resident’s EC residence permit granted to beneficiaries of international protection should contain a remark providing information about the fact that international protection was granted by a Member State to its holder.
Če mednarodna zaščita ni bila odvzeta, mora biti ta opomba navedena v dovoljenju za prebivanje ES rezidenta za daljši čas, ki ga je izdala druga država članica.
Provided that international protection has not been withdrawn, this remark should be reproduced in the long-term resident’s EC residence permit issued by the second Member State.
Druga država članica pa ne sme te opombe uporabiti kot izgovor, da na svojem ozemlju neposredno ali posredno zavrne dodelitev dovoljenja za bivanje za daljši čas.
However, the second Member State may not use this remark as a pretext, whether directly or indirectly, to refuse to grant long-term residence in its territory.
Člen 1 – točka 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
V členu 2 se točka (f) nadomesti z naslednjim :
In Article 2, point (f) is replaced by the following :
V členu 2 se doda točka (fa) :
In Article 2, the following point (f a ) is added :
„(f) ‚mednarodna zaščita‛ pomeni mednarodno zaščito, kakor je opredeljena v členu 2(a) Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES;“
‘( f ) “international protection” means international protection as defined in Article 2(a) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC;’
„(f a ) ‚mednarodna zaščita‛ pomeni mednarodno zaščito, kakor je opredeljena v členu 2(a) Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES;“
‘( fa ) “international protection” means international protection as defined in Article 2(a) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC;’
Člen 1 – točka 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
„Glede upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite se pri izračunavanju obdobja, navedenega v odstavku 1, upošteva obdobje med datumom, ko je bila vloga za mednarodno zaščito vložena , in datumom, ko je bilo dovoljenje za prebivanje iz člena 24 Direktive 2004/83/ES odobreno.“
‘Regarding beneficiaries of international protection, the period between the date on which the application for international protection is lodged and the date on which the residence permit referred to in Article 24 of Directive 2004/83/EC is granted shall be taken into account in the calculation of the period referred to in paragraph 1.’
„Glede upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite se pri izračunavanju obdobja, navedenega v odstavku 1, upošteva obdobje med datumom, ko je bila vložena prva vloga za mednarodno zaščito – tudi kadar je to vloga za začasno zaščito za obdobje pred dostopom do mednarodne zaščite – in datumom, ko je bilo dovoljenje za prebivanje iz člena 24 Direktive 2004/83/ES odobreno.“
‘Regarding beneficiaries of international protection, the period between the date on which the first application for international protection is lodged , including where this first application is an application for temporary protection where the latter precedes access to international protection, and the date on which the residence permit referred to in Article 24 of Directive 2004/83/EC is granted shall be taken into account in the calculation of the period referred to in paragraph 1.’
Člen 1 – točka 3 a (novo)
Article 1 - point 3 a (new)
Člen 5 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
V členu 5(1) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
In Article 5(1), the following subparagraph shall be added:
„Zahteva se ne uporablja za upravičence do mednarodne zaščite, ki nimajo dostopa do zaposlitve.“
‘Such requirement shall not apply to beneficiaries of international protection who do not have access to employment.’.
Člen 1 – točka 3 b (novo)
Article 1 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Člen 5 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
V členu 5(2) se doda naslednji odstavek:
In Article 5(2), the following subparagraph shall be added:
„Izpolnjevanje nacionalnih pogojev za integracijo se lahko od upravičencev zahteva z obrazložitvenim sklepom in v skladu s členom 33 Direktive 2004/83/ES šele po individualni obravnavi ter ob upoštevanju njihovega posebno ranljivega položaja.“
‘National integration conditions may be applied to beneficiaries of international protection, by a reasoned decision in accordance with Article 33 of Directive 2004/83/EC, only after individual consideration of their case, bearing in mind their particularly vulnerable situation.’
Člen 1 – točka 6
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Člen 12 – odstavek 3 a
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a
Ko se država članica odloči za izgon rezidenta za daljši čas, katerega dovoljenje za prebivanje ES za daljši čas vsebuje opombo iz člena 8(4), se posvetuje z državo članico , navedeno v opombi .
Where a Member State decides to expel a long-term resident whose long-term resident’s EC residence permit contains the remark referred to in Article 8(4), it shall consult the Member State mentioned in the remark .
Ko se država članica odloči za izgon rezidenta za daljši čas, katerega dovoljenje za prebivanje ES za daljši čas vsebuje opombo iz člena 8(4), se obrne na državo članico , ki mu je podelila mednarodno zaščito, da potrdi njegov status rezidenta za daljši čas .
Where a Member State decides to expel a long-term resident whose long-term resident’s EC residence permit contains the remark referred to in Article 8(4), it shall contact the Member State that granted international protection in order to confirm the status of long-term resident .
Država članica, ki podeli mednarodno zaščito, mora državi, ki je vložila zahtevo, pisno odgovoriti v roku največ enega meseca.
The Member State that granted international protection must respond in writing to the Member State that made the request within a maximum of one month.
Sklep o izgonu je lahko sprejet šele po prejetju odgovora države članice, ki je podelila mednarodno zaščito.
The decision to expel the long-term resident may not be taken until the response of the Member State that granted international protection has been received.
Razen če je bila medtem mednarodna zaščita odvzeta, se rezidenta za daljši čas izžene v to državo članico, ki bo rezidenta za daljši čas in njegove družinske člane nemudoma ponovno sprejela brez formalnosti.“
Unless in the meantime international protection has been withdrawn, the long-term resident shall be expelled to this Member State, which shall immediately readmit without formalities the long-term resident and his/her family members.’
Razen če je bila medtem mednarodna zaščita odvzeta skladno z načelom nevračanja , se rezidenta za daljši čas lahko izžene samo v to državo članico, ki bo rezidenta za daljši čas in njegove družinske člane nemudoma ponovno sprejela brez formalnosti.“
Unless in the meantime international protection has been withdrawn, the long ‑term resident may, in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, only be expelled to this Member State, which shall immediately readmit without formalities the long-term resident and his/her family members .’
Člen 1 – točka 8
Article 1 – paragraph 8
Člen 25 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 25 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Komisija pripravi seznam kontaktnih točk, ki ga redno posodablja in posreduje državam članicam.
The Commission shall draw up a list of contact points, update it regularly and forward it to the Member States.
Direktiva Sveta 2003/109/ES z dne 25. novembra 2003 o statusu državljanov tretjih držav, ki so rezidenti za daljši čas
Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents
Države članice so na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Tampereju leta 1999 poudarile, da je treba zagotoviti pravično obravnavanje državljanov držav članic, ki zakonito prebivajo v Evropski uniji.
On the occasion of the 1999 Tampere European Council the Member States stressed the need to guarantee fair treatment for Member State nationals residing legally in the European Union.
Zlasti je treba vsem državljanom tretjih držav, ki trajno prebivajo v državi članici, priznati sklop enotnih pravic, čim bolj enakih pravicam, ki jih uživajo državljani Evropske unije.
In particular, any third-country national residing on a long-term basis in a Member State should be granted a set of uniform rights that was as close as possible to those enjoyed by European Union citizens.
Točka 21 sklepov iz Tampereja.
Point 21 of the Tampere conclusions.
– rezidenti za daljši čas: vsi državljani tretje države, ki imajo status iz zadevne direktive. .
Union; – ‘long-term resident’ means any third-country national who has long-term resident status as provided for by the Directive.
V skladu s to direktivo morajo države članice priznati status rezidenta za daljši čas po petih letih zakonitega in neprekinjenega bivanja v državi članici.
Under the Directive Member States must grant long-term resident status after a period of five years of legal, continuous residence in a Member State .
Državljan tretje države mora za pridobitev statusa rezidenta za daljši čas zagotoviti dokazila o tem, da ima zase in za (vzdrževane) družinske člane:
To obtain long-term resident status, third-country nationals must provide evidence for themselves and their families (if dependent):
– stalni in ustrezni vir dohodkov, ki zadostuje njihovim potrebam, ne da bi uporabljali sistem socialne pomoči države članice;
– of stable resources which are sufficient to maintain them without recourse to the social assistance system of the Member State concerned;
– zdravstveno zavarovanje.
– of sickness insurance.
Države članice lahko od državljanov tretjih držav zahtevajo, da izpolnjujejo dodatne pogoje za integracijo (kot je ustrezno znanje jezika).
The Member States can require third-country nationals to fulfil further integration conditions (such as adequate knowledge of a national language).
Dodelitev statusa lahko odklonijo zaradi javnega reda in javne varnosti .
They can refuse to grant long-term resident status on grounds of public policy or public security .
Zainteresirana oseba je po pridobitvi statusa rezidenta za daljši čas upravičena do vrste storitev pod enakimi pogoji kot državljani države članice , zlasti glede pogojev dostopa do zaposlitve, izobraževanja in poklicnega usposabljanja, socialne zaščite, socialne pomoči, prostega dostopa do celotnega ozemlja zadevne države članice itd.
Having acquired long-term resident status, the person in question enjoys a series of entitlements under the same conditions as nationals of the Member State , including access to employment, education and vocational training, social security, social assistance, freedom of access to the entire territory of the Member State concerned, etc.
Rezident za daljši čas ima pravico do prebivanja tudi v drugih državah članicah in ne le v državi, ki mu je izdala status, in sicer za obdobje, daljše od treh mesecev, če so izpolnjeni nekateri pogoji iz predloga, kot je opravljanje gospodarske dejavnosti, študij ali poklicno usposabljanje.
Long-term residents may exercise the right to reside in the territory of Member States other than the one which granted them long-term residence status, for a period exceeding three months, provided that certain conditions set out in the proposal, such as the exercise of an economic activity or the pursuit of studies or training, are met.
Kljub naštetemu lahko države članice omejijo število dovoljenj za prebivanje.
Member States may nevertheless limit the number of residence permits.
Prav tako lahko v zvezi s politiko trga dela dajo prednost državljanom Unije.
At the same time, for reasons of labour market policy, Member States may give preference to Union citizens.
Oseba, ki ima status rezidenta za daljši čas, uživa večjo zaščito pred sklepom o izgonu .
Anyone with long-term resident status has greater protection against any expulsion decision.
Vedenje rezidenta za daljši čas, na podlagi katerega se sprejme sklep o izgonu, mora predstavljati dejansko ter dovolj resno grožnjo za javni red in javno varnost.
Behaviour justifying an expulsion decision must constitute an actual and sufficiently serious threat to public order or public security.
Preden države članice sprejmejo sklep o izgonu rezidenta za daljši čas, morajo upoštevati posebne dejavnike (starost posameznika, trajanje prebivanja …).
Before taking a decision to expel a long-term resident, Member States undertake to give consideration to a number of factors (the person’s age, duration of residence, etc.).
2003/109/E S se uporablja za vse državljane tretjih držav, ki zakonito prebivajo na ozemlju držav članic.
Directive 2003/109/EC is applicable to any third-country national residing legally on the territory of a Member State.
Vseeno je Svet ob sprejetju te direktive z njenega področja uporabe izključil begunce in upravičence do začasne ali subsidiarne zaščite.
Despite this, refugees and persons authorised to reside in a Member State on the basis of a temporary or subsidiary form of protection were excluded by the Council from the scope of the Directive at the time of its adoption.
Razlog je bil njihov negotovi položaj ali kratek čas prebivanja.
The reason given was their precarious situation or the shortness of their stay.
V predlogu Komisije za direktivo iz leta 2001 pa so bili begunci upravičeni do statusa rezidenta za daljši čas.
And yet the proposal presented by the Commission in 2001, on which the Directive is based, provided for refugees to be eligible for long-term resident status.
Evropski parlament je to stališče podprl.
The European Parliament also supported this position.
Svet in Komisija, ki se te vrzeli zavedata, sta v skupni izjavi z dne 8. maja 2003 pozvala k razširitvi področja uporabe direktive na upravičence do mednarodne zaščite.
In a joint declaration of 8 May 2003, the Council and Commission, conscious of this lacuna, expressed a desire for the Directive to be extended to include the beneficiaries of international protection.
Cilj tega predloga je torej uveljavitev navedene izjave z vključitvijo upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite na področje uporabe Direktive Sveta 2003/109/ES.
The aim of this proposal is to implement that declaration by bringing beneficiaries of international protection within the scope of Council Directive 2003/109/EC.
Stališče poročevalke
The rapporteur’s position
Direktiva pod določenimi pogoji podeljuje pravico do prebivanja v drugi državi članici le rezidentom za daljši čas, ne pa tudi upravičencem do mednarodne zaščite kot takšne.
The Directive grants the right, under certain conditions, to establish themselves in a second Member State only to long-term residents, and not to beneficiaries of international protection per se.
Čeprav je lahko v nekaterih primerih posledica prebivanja v drugi državi članici prenos odgovornosti za zaščito v določenem trenutku, je to vprašanje izven področja uporabe te direktive.
Although establishment in a second Member State can in certain cases lead, sooner or later, to a transfer of responsibility for protection, this issue does not fall within the scope of the present directive.
To pomeni, da zahteve za prenos odgovornosti za zaščito še naprej urejata Ženevska konvencija iz leta 1951 in Evropski sporazum o prenosu odgovornosti za begunce, sklenjen v okviru Sveta Evrope, kadar je to primerno.
The implication of this is that applications for transfer of responsibility for protection continue to be governed by the 1951 Geneva Convention and, in some cases, by the European agreement on the transfer of responsibility for refugees concluded in the framework of the Council of Europe.
Mehanizem Skupnosti za prenos zaščite pomeni vzajemno priznavanje odločitev o azilu in zadostno raven usklajevanja azilnih postopkov držav članic, čemur pa zdaj ni tako.
A Community mechanism on transfer of protection presupposes mutual recognition of asylum decisions and a sufficient measure of harmonisation of asylum procedures in Member States.
Poročevalka se strinja z mnenjem Komisije, da se mora ta direktiva nujno uporabljati za begunce in upravičence do subsidiarne zaščite.
The rapporteur shares the Commission’s view that it is crucial that this Directive should apply to both refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection.
Subsidiarna zaščita dejansko vedno pogosteje zadeva osebe, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, zato ni sprejemljivo, da je iz pravic, dodeljenih v skladu z Direktivo 2003/109/ES, izključenih tako veliko oseb.
Subsidiary protection is increasingly being granted to people in need of international protection, and it would be unacceptable to exclude such a large number of people from the rights conferred by Directive 2003/109/EC.
Poleg tega sklepi z vrhunskega zasedanja v Tampereju in zelena knjiga o prihodnjem skupnem evropskem azilnem sistemu predvidevajo uvedbo skupnega azilnega postopka in enotnega statusa, veljavnega na celotnem ozemlju EU.
Furthermore, the conclusions of the Tampere Summit and the Green Paper on the future Common European Asylum System provide for the creation of a common asylum procedure and the introduction of a uniform status applicable throughout EU territory.
To temelji na prizadevanju, da bi Unija postala enotni prostor zaščite za begunce.
This is based on the wish to make the Union into a single area of protection for refugees.
Uvedba razlikovanja med pravicami beguncev in pravicami upravičencev do subsidiarne zaščite v tem dokumentu torej ni v skladu z zadevnimi cilji.
It would therefore be inconsistent with these objectives to build into this instrument a distinction between the rights of refugees and the rights of beneficiaries of subsidiary protection.
Glavno merilo za pridobitev statusa rezidenta za daljši čas je torej trajanje prebivanja na ozemlju države članice in ne status zadevne osebe.
Finally, the main criterion for acquiring long-term residence status is the duration of residence on the territory of a Member State, and not the status of the person concerned.
Poročevalka prav tako vztraja, da bi se postopek obravnave upošteval pri izračunu petih let prebivanja pred vložitvijo prošnje za status rezidenta za daljši čas.
The rapporteur is also insistent that the time spent processing the application should be taken into account in calculating the five years of residence preceding application for long-term residence status.
Pravni status upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite dejansko začne veljati z vložitvijo prve prošnje.
The legal status of beneficiaries of international protection becomes operative with their first application.
To obdobje predhodnega zakonitega prebivanja se potrdi s priznanjem statusa.
Recognition of that status testifies to the prior period of legal residence.
Poleg tega je lahko postopek obravnave v nekaterih državah članicah dolgotrajen, zato se postopek integracije upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite v državi gostiteljici začne takoj po začetku postopka obravnave.
Also, the process of considering an application can be a long one, depending on the Member State involved, and a beneficiary of international protection starts the process of integration in the host country as soon as the procedure begins.
Poročevalka dodaja, da v nekaterih primerih več oseb vloži prošnjo za začasno zaščito, preden so upravičene do vložitve prošnje za mednarodno zaščito.
The rapporteur would add that in a number of cases people make an initial application for temporary protection before becoming eligible to make an application for international protection.
Kadar torej ta začasna zaščita sproži mednarodno zaščito, jo je treba pri trajanju postopka upoštevati.
When the temporary protection leads on to international protection, it should also be factored into the duration of the procedure.
Poročevalka želi, da bi bili upravičenci do mednarodne zaščite pri dodelitvi statusa rezidenta za daljši čas oproščeni materialnih pogojev (stalni in redni vir dohodka, zdravstveno zavarovanje) in da bi se upošteval njihov ranljivi položaj.
The rapporteur would like beneficiaries of international protection to be exempted from the material conditions (stable resources and sickness insurance) for the granting of long-term resident status, in recognition of the vulnerability of their situation.
Prav tako ne bi bilo smiselno uvesti pogoja minimalnih sredstev, ker člen 11 Direktive Sveta 2003/9/ES z dne 27. januarja 2003 o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil omogoča državam članicam, da omejijo njihov dostop do trga dela za obdobje do 12 mesecev od datuma vložitve prošnje za zaščito.
It would be particularly inconsistent to impose a minimum resource condition on them given that Article 11 of Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers in the Member States allows Member States to place restrictions on asylum seekers’ access to the employment market for a period of up to 12 months after the date of lodging their application for protection.
Poročevalka želi, da bi bila nacionalna merila za integracijo, ki jih lahko uporabljajo države članice, natančneje določena, zato da bi se upošteval posebni položaj upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite.
Your rapporteur would like the national integration criteria that can be applied by the Member States to be framed in more precise terms to take account of the particular situation of beneficiaries of international protection.
Merila za jezikovno znanje ali poznavanje kulture se za begunce zaradi njihovega posebnega statusa ne morejo uporabljati na enak način.
Linguistic or cultural knowledge criteria cannot be applied to refugees in the same way as to other people, given the special status of the former.
Poleg tega morajo biti ta merila v skladu z merili za integracijo iz direktive 2004/83/ES.
These criteria must, furthermore, be consistent with the integration criteria provided for in Directive 2004/83/EC.
Glede na to, da se odgovornost za mednarodno zaščito ne prenese na drugo državo članico, je nujno treba zagotoviti, da druga država članica spoštuje načelo nevračanja.
Given that there is no transfer of responsibility for international protection to the second Member State, it is vital to ensure that the principle of non-refoulement is observed by that State.
To je pomembneje, kadar upravičenec do mednarodne zaščite dobi status rezidenta za daljši čas v drugi državi članici, potem ko pet let prebiva v tej državi.
This point is all the more important when a beneficiary of international protection is granted long-term resident status in a second Member State after five years of residence there.
Za zagotovitev načela nevračanja je treba ta mehanizem okrepiti.
This mechanism must be reinforced in order to safeguard the principle of non-refoulement.
Poročevalka zato predlaga, da morajo organi druge države članice počakati na pisni odgovor prve države, s čimer se zagotovi, da oseba ni vrnjena v državo, v kateri je ogrožena.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that the authorities in the second Member States be required to wait for the written response of the first Member State, so as to guarantee that the person is not sent back to a country where he or she would be in danger.
o predlogu direktive Sveta o spremembi direktive 2003/109/ES, da se razširi njeno področje uporabe na upravičence do mednarodne zaščite
on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2003/109/EC to extend its scope to beneficiaries of international protection
Cilj predloga je beguncem in upravičencem do subsidiarne zaščite (v nadaljnjem besedilu „upravičenci do mednarodne zaščite“) po petih letih zakonitega bivanja zagotoviti pravno varnost pri njihovem prebivanju v državi članici in pravice, ki so primerljive s pravicami državljanov EU, s tem pa zapolniti vrzel, ki je ostala po direktivi 2004/83/ES.
The aim of the proposal is to offer refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection (hereinafter referred to as ‘beneficiaries of international protection’) legal certainty about their residence in a Member State and rights which are comparable to those of EU nationals after 5 years of legal residence, thus closing a gap left open by Directive 2004/83/EC.