natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
14. se je seznanil s sporočilom Komisije z dne 19. novembra 2009 o razvijanju javno-zasebnih partnerstev in z velikim zanimanjem pričakuje ustrezno oceno učinka; pričakuje, da bo Komisija iz neuspešnih javno-zasebnih partnerstev izpeljala poučne zaključke; poudarja, da je treba pri koncesijah za storitve ustrezno upoštevati zapletenost postopkov in razlike v pravosodni kulturi in sodni praksi držav članic; meni, da je z direktivama o javnih naročilih iz leta 2004 in dopolnilno sodno prakso Sodišča EU postopek opredelitve pojma koncesije za storitve in vzpostavitve njenega pravnega okvira zdaj napredoval; vztraja, da je vsak predlog pravnega akta, ki obravnava koncesije za storitve, utemeljen samo, če je namenjen odpravi izkrivljanj v delovanju notranjega trga; poudarja, da tovrstna izkrivljanja doslej niso bila odkrita in da je zato pravni akt o koncesijah za storitve nepotreben, če ni usmerjen v jasno določljivo izboljšavo delovanja notranjega trga;
Notes the Commission communication of 19 November 2009 on the development of public-private partnerships and awaits the relevant impact assessment with great interest; expects the Commission to draw lessons from failing PPPs; emphasises that due account must be taken of both the complexity of the procedures and the differences between the Member States in terms of legal culture and practice with regard to service concessions; takes the view that the process of defining the term ‘service concession’ and establishing the legal framework governing such concessions has evolved as a result of the 2004 public procurement directives and the CJEU’s supplementary case-law; insists that any proposal for a legal act dealing with service concessions would be justified only with a view to remedying distortions in the functioning of the internal market; points out that such distortions have not hitherto been identified, and that a legal act on service concessions is therefore unnecessary as long as it is not geared to an identifiable improvement in the functioning of the internal market;
Javno–zasebno partnerstvo
Public- p rivate p artnership
– izbira zasebnega partnerja poteka prek preglednega postopka, v katerem se po preveritvi finančnih, tehničnih, poslovnih in upravnih zahtev in značilnosti ponudbe za opravilo ustrezne storitve, vnaprej objavi javno naročilo;
– the private partner must be selected by means of a transparent procedure, with the contract published in advance following a review of the financial, technical, operational and administrative requirements and the characteristics of the tender in the light of the particular service to be provided;
– zato meni, da je razjasnjeno tudi vprašanje glede uporabe zakonodaje o javnih razpisih pri institucionaliziranih javno-zasebnih partnerstvih, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj o tem ustrezno obveščajo;
takes the view, therefore, that the matter of the application of procurement law to institutionalised public-private partnerships has been settled, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to issue statements to that effect;
Urbanizem/urbanistični razvoj
Town p lanning/ u rban d evelopment
18. opozarja, da se je Evropski parlament pridružil tožbi Nemčija proti Komisiji pred Sodiščem EU z dne 14. septembra 2006 proti razlagalnemu sporočilu Komisije z dne 1. avgusta 2006 o zakonodaji Skupnosti, ki velja za oddajo javnih naročil, ki niso zajeta ali so samo delno zajeta v direktivah o javnih naročilih, in pričakuje hitro odločitev;
Points out that the European Parliament is a party to the Germany v. Commission case brought before the CJEU on 14 September 2006 against the Commission’s interpretative communication of 1 August 2006 on the Community law applicable to contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the public procurement directives, and expects a prompt ruling;
Mikropodjetja, mala in srednja podjetja
Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises
22. podpira sistematično sprejemanje alternativnih ponudb (ali različic); poudarja, da so razpisni pogoji, zlasti odobritev alternativnih ponudb, ključni za spodbujanje in širjenje inovativnih rešitev; poudarja, da specifikacije, ki navajajo zahtevani učinek in funkcionalne zahteve glede in dopuščajo različice, dajejo ponudnikom možnost, da predlagajo inovativne rešitve;
Supports the systematic admission of alternative bids (or variants); points out that tender conditions, in particular the admission of alternative bids, are crucial for promoting and disseminating innovative solutions; stresses that specifications referring to performance and functional requirements and the express admission of variants give tenderers the opportunity to propose innovative solutions;
Zelena naročila
Green p rocurement
29. ponavlja svoj poziv Komisiji iz svojega poročila iz februarja 2009, naj oblikuje priročnik o predkomercialnih naročilih, ki bo opisoval praktične primere delitve tveganja in koristi v skladu s tržnimi pogoji; nadalje meni, da je treba pravice intelektualne lastnine prenašati na podjetja, ki sodelujejo v predkomercialnih naročilih, da bi na ta način krepili razumevanje pri državnih organih in spodbujali dobavitelje, da bi se vključevali v postopke predkomercialnih naročil;
Reiterates its previous call, in its report of February 2009, for the Commission to produce a handbook on pre-commercial procurement, which should illustrate practical examples of risk-benefit sharing according to market conditions; takes the view, in addition, that intellectual property rights must be vested in the companies participating in pre-commercial procurement, which would foster understanding amongst public authorities and encourage suppliers to become involved in pre-commercial procurement procedures;
Družbeno odgovorna javna naročila
Social ly responsible p rocurement
33. poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja državne organe, da v svojih javnih razpisih in nabavnih politikah uporabljajo merila pravične trgovine na osnovi opredelitve pravične trgovine iz resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o pravični trgovini in razvoju z dne 6. julija 2006 in nedavnega sporočila Evropske komisije z dne 5. maja 2009; znova poziva Komisijo, naj to spodbuja na primer z oblikovanjem konstruktivnih smernic za javna naročila pravične trgovine; pozdravlja soglasno sprejetje mnenja Odbora regij z dne 11. februarja 2010, ki poziva k skupni evropski strategiji pravične trgovine za lokalne in regionalne organe;
Calls on the Commission to encourage public authorities to use fair trade criteria in their public tenders and purchasing policies on the basis of the definition of fair trade set out in the European Parliament resolution of 6 July 2006 on fair trade and development and the recent Commission communication of 5 May 2009; reiterates its earlier call for the Commission to promote the use of such criteria by, for example, producing constructive guidelines on fair trade procurement; welcomes the unanimous adoption of the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 11 February 2010 calling for a common European fair trade strategy for local and regional authorities;
34. spodbuja vzpostavitev pogosto posodobljene zbirke podatkov za standarde, zlasti za tiste v zvezi z okoljskimi in družbenimi merili, ki bi bila na razpolago javnim organom, da bi imeli naročniki pri pripravi razpisov na razpolago ustrezne smernice in jasna pravila, da lahko enostavno preverijo njihovo skladnost z ustreznimi standardi; pričakuje polno sodelovanje držav članic in vseh zainteresiranih strani; ugotavlja, da bi ta proces od spodaj navzgor moral upoštevati dragocene izkušnje in znanje, ki pogosto obstaja na lokalni, regionalni in nacionalni ravni; nadalje opozarja na negativne posledice razdrobljenega trga zaradi številnih različnih regionalnih, državnih, evropskih in mednarodnih oznak zlasti na področju inovacij in raziskav;
Calls for the development of a frequently updated database of standards, especially those relating to environmental and social criteria, to be made available to public authorities, in order to ensure that procurers have access to appropriate guidance and a clear set of rules when drawing up tenders, so that they can easily verify their compliance with the relevant standard; expects the Member States and all stakeholders to be fully involved in this process; notes that this bottom-up process should take into account the valuable experience and knowledge that often exists at local, regional and national level; draws attention, furthermore, to the negative impact which a market fragmented by the existence of numerous different regional, national, European and international labels has on innovation and research;
Regionalni razvoj
Regional d evelopment
40. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost uporabe pospešenih oblik postopkov v povezavi s strukturnimi skladi tudi po letu 2010 ter možnost podaljšanja začasnega povečanja mejnih vrednosti, da bi se pospeševale naložbe;
Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of continuing to use accelerated procedures in connection with the Structural Funds, even beyond 2010, and extending the temporary threshold increase, with the specific aim of speeding up investment;
Mednarodna trgovina
International t rade 41.
41. poudarja, da so notranji trg in mednarodni trgi vedno bolj medsebojno povezani; skladno s tem meni, da bi se morali oblikovalci zakonov za notranji trg EU in pogajalci EU na področju mednarodne trgovine pri izvajanju svojih dejavnosti zavedati možnih posledic za obe strani in da bi morali sprejeti skladno politiko, ki bi bila vselej usmerjena v spodbujanje vrednot EU v politiki javnih naročil, kot so preglednost, odločno odklanjanje korupcije ter spodbujanje socialnih in človekovih pravic; poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter Odbor za mednarodno trgovino, da zaradi krepitve sinergij prirejata skupne informativne sestanke;
Points out that the internal market and international markets are increasingly interlinked; takes the view, in this context, that the EU internal market legislators and EU negotiators in the field of international trade should be mindful of the possible consequences for one another when conducting their activities, and that they should adopt a coherent policy that is always directed to the promotion of EU values in procurement policies, including transparency, a principled stance against corruption and the advancement of social and human rights; invites the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on International Trade to hold joint briefing sessions in order to foster synergies;
47. opozarja na določbe členov 58 in 59 Direktive 2004/17/ES; poziva države članice, naj v celoti izkoristijo možnost obveščanja Komisije o težavah v zvezi z dostopom njihovih podjetij do trgov tretjih držav in poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme učinkovite ukrepe, s katerimi bo zagotovila, da bodo podjetja EU dejansko imela dostop do teh trgov;
Draws attention to the provisions of Articles 58 and 59 of Directive 2004/17/EC; calls on the Member States to make full use of the possibility of informing the Commission of problems relating to access by their undertakings to third-country markets, and calls on the Commission to take effective measures to ensure that EU undertakings enjoy genuine access to third-country markets;
Skupni znesek letnih izdatkov iz naslova javnih naročil blaga in storitev v Evropski uniji znaša prek 16 % bruto domačega proizvoda oz. več kot 1.500 milijard EUR
Total annual expenditure on the public procurement of goods and services in the European Union amounts to EUR 1500 billion, or more than 16% of EU GDP
Podatki Mednarodnega denarnega sklada za leto 2006, BDP v milijonih USD na podlagi tečaja za EU oktobra 2007: 14.609.840 milijonov USD, tudi ob upoštevanju, da je majhen del namenjen nakupu obrambne opreme. .
International Monetary Fund figures for 2006, nominal EU GDP on the basis of the October 2007 exchange rate: US$ 14 609 840 million, even if a tiny proportion is spent on defence goods. .
Od tega je delež mednarodnih javnih naročil le za 3 %.
International public procurement accounts for a mere 3% of that figure, however.
Glavni namen javnega naročanja je gospodaren in ugoden nakup blaga in storitev za opravljanje nalog javnih storitev.
The main purpose of public procurement is the cost-effective purchase of goods and services with a view to the performance of public-service tasks.
Državni organi niso običajni udeleženci na trgu, ampak imajo posebno odgovornost, saj upravljajo z javnimi finančnimi sredstvi.
Public authorities are not typical market participants, however; since they manage public funds they bear a particular responsibility.
Javno naročanje mora po možnosti prispevati k rešitvi večjih izzivov, in sicer pri obvladovanju svetovne gospodarske in finančne krize, podnebnih sprememb in vse večje revščine v južnih državah.
Wherever possible, public procurement should make a contribution to meeting the major challenges facing society: the global economic and financial crisis, climate change and the ever worsening crisis of poverty in the countries of the South.
Jasno je, da imajo naročniki korist od evropskega notranjega trga in njegovih pravil: večji trgi omogočajo večjo svobodo izbire, to pa lahko pomeni nižje stroške in večjo kakovost; večja preglednost pomaga v boju proti korupciji in goljufijam; čezmejno sodelovanje ponuja nove možnosti ukrepanja in nove izkušnje.
There is no doubt that public contracting authorities are benefiting from the European internal market and its rules: larger markets create more choice, which can lead to lower costs and better quality; greater transparency helps to fight corruption and fraud; cross-border cooperation creates new possibilities for action and offers the chance of new experiences.
Tudi izvajalci, zlasti mala in srednja podjetja, se spopadajo z birokratskimi postopki in pomanjkanjem pravne varnosti.
Contractors as well, in particular small and medium-sized undertakings, are suffering under the burden of red tape and legal uncertainty.
Obstajajo še mnoge druge študije o dodatnih stroških oz. dolgotrajnejših postopkih, vendar jih v tem poročilu ni mogoče podrobneje predstaviti.
Many studies have been drawn up showing just how costs are increasing and procedures are becoming lengthier, although they cannot be dealt with in detail in this report.
Pravna negotovost
Legal uncertainties
Razloge za to stanje je mogoče najti na različnih ravneh.
There are various reasons for this development.
Namen revizije direktiv o javnih naročilih iz leta 2004 je bil doseči poenostavitev, posodobitev in večjo prožnost javnih naročil, vendar ta cilj ni bil izpolnjen.
The aim of the 2004 revision of the public procurement directives was to simplify and modernise the procedures for the award of public contracts and make them more flexible; that aim has not been achieved, however.
Po eni strani sami direktivi v nekaterih zadevah nista dovolj jasni, politična razhajanja v Svetu in Parlamentu pa so privedla do kompromisov o besedilu ter pomanjkljivosti in neskladnosti pravnega besedila.
On the one hand, some provisions of the directives themselves are not sufficiently clear: political disagreements in the Council and Parliament resulted in compromises on wording, loopholes and inconsistencies in the texts.
Po drugi strani je bil prenos v državah članicah dolgotrajen, preneseni različici direktiv sta pogosto postali še strožji, uvedena so bila dodatna merila, nekateri instrumenti za večjo prožnost pa so bili izpuščeni; kratko rečeno direktivi nista bili preneseni v izvirni obliki.
On the other, the transposition process in the Member States proved to be a time-consuming one, the transposed versions often contained more stringent provisions, additional criteria were incorporated, whilst some provision designed to increase flexibility were left out: In short, the letter of the law changed during transposition.
Zaradi pravnih nejasnosti je bilo sproženo mnogo pritožbenih postopkov ter mnogo nacionalnih in evropskih sodnih postopkov.
Legal uncertainties have led to a plethora of appeal procedures and national and European court cases.
S sodno prakso Sodišča in mehkim pravom Komisije so se skušale zapolniti pravne vrzeli, kar pa ni izboljšalo preglednosti.
Attempts have been made, through the case-law of the CJEU and by means of Commission soft law proposals, to close the legal loopholes, an approach which has merely added to the confusion.
Vse to je privedlo do zapletenega pravnega režima, zaradi katerega se zlasti manjša mesta in občine ter mala in srednja podjetja soočajo s hudimi pravnimi težavami, ki jih brez večjih stroškov ali zunanjega pravnega svetovanja ne morejo več rešiti, pomembni razpisni projekti pa so zaradi pravnih nejasnosti ali zagroženih sodnih postopkov zaustavljeni.
All this has left us with a complex set of rules which are creating serious legal problems, primarily for smaller local authorities, but also for small and medium-sized undertakings, problems which they can no longer solve without incurring additional costs or seeking external legal advice.
Skoraj ni področja, kjer bi bilo tako veliko pravnih sporov.
Legal uncertainties or the threat of legal action have brought important procurement projects to a halt and there is hardly another area in which so many legal disputes have flared up.
Napačna uporaba predpisov za oddajo javnih naročil spada med najpogostejše napake pri delovanju evropskih strukturnih skladov.
The incorrect application of the rules governing procurement is one of the most common causes of errors in the disbursement of resources under the European Structural Funds.
Glavna področja pravnih sporov se med drugim nanašajo na javno-javna partnerstva, urbanizem (tudi gradnje socialnih stanovanj) in koncesije za storitve.
The main areas of legal dispute concern public-public partnerships, town planning (including the construction of social housing) and service concessions.
Nejasnosti so tudi na področju javno-zasebnih partnerstev, pri nabavi izdelkov pravične trgovine, uporabi direktiv o javnih razpisih pod mejnimi vrednostmi in možnosti, da se pri javnem naročanju upoštevajo družbena merila, kot so enako plačilo, enakost med spoloma, spoštovanje kolektivnih pogodb, zaposlovanje dolgotrajno brezposelnih ali mladih, ki jih je težko zaposliti.
However, there is also uncertainty surrounding public-private partnerships, the procurement of fair-trade products, the application of the public procurement directives to contracts whose value falls below the relevant thresholds and the scope for taking account of social criteria, such as equal pay, gender equality, compliance with wage agreements and the provision of jobs for the long-term unemployed and young people with poor skills or qualifications.
Pomanjkljivo usklajevanje znotraj Komisije
Inadequate coordination within the Commission
Poleg tega je pomanjkljivo tudi usklajevanje znotraj Evropske komisije.
There is also a lack of coordination within the Commission.
Mnogo služb je javna naročila „odkrilo“ kot orodje za dosego ciljev, za katere Evropska unija sicer nima dovolj finančnih sredstev ali pristojnosti.
Many Commission departments have ‘discovered’ public procurement as a means of achieving objectives for which the European Union would otherwise lack the financial resources or the legislative competence.
Seveda je smiselno, da se javne naročnike spodbuja in podpira pri ekoloških in družbeno odgovornih javnih naročilih ter da se spodbujajo raziskave in inovacije.
It of course makes sense to encourage contracting authorities to engage in ecologically and socially responsible procurement and to foster research and innovation.
Vendar številne pobude ne prispevajo k pravni jasnosti in tako spodbijajo cilj, ki ga je smiselno podpreti.
However, the many initiatives which have resulted do not make for legal clarity and are undermining efforts to achieve what is in itself a worthwhile objective.
Preobsežno mehko pravo pa povzroča še večjo pravno neskladnost.
A plethora of soft law measures has merely added to the legal inconsistencies.
Komisija bi morala pri oblikovanju mehkega prava upoštevati načelo sorazmernosti in praktične posledice na lokalni ravni.
When developing soft law, the Commission should consider whether its proposals are consistent with the proportionality principle and their practical implications at local level.
V nedavni študiji Evropskega inštituta za javno upravo o institucionalnih vplivih zakonodaje EU na lokalne in regionalne oblasti „The Institutional Impacts of EU Legislation on Local and Regional Governments, A Case Study of the 199/31/EC Landfill Waste and 2004/18/EC Public Procurement Directives“ je med drugim kritizirana pogosta uporaba mehkega prava: „uporaba mehkega prava za urejanje zelo pomembnih vidikov Direktive je še ena pomembna pomanjkljivost, saj ni mogoče predvideti institucionalnih vplivov mehkega prava“.
The most recent study produced by the European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), ‘The Institutional Impacts of EU Legislation on Local and Regional Governments, A Case Study of the 1999/31/EC Landfill Waste and 2004/18/EC Public Procurement Directives’, criticises the extensive use of soft law: ‘using soft law to regulate very important aspects of the Directive is another important shortcoming: it is not possible to foresee the institutional impact of soft law’.
V skladu s pobudo za boljšo pripravo zakonodaje bi bilo treba preučiti vplive mehkega prava in preveriti vprašanje subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti (skrajšana ocena učinka).
In keeping with the aims of the Better Lawmaking initiative, the impact of soft law should also be studied and the issue of compliance with the subsidiarity and proportionality principles reviewed (shortened impact assessment).
Pri izvajanju evropske zakonodaje o javnih naročilih s strani Komisije na žalost ni pravega političnega ravnovesja.
Unfortunately there has thus far been a lack of political balance to the Commission’s implementation of European public procurement law.
Medtem ko je na področju ekološkega in energetsko učinkovitega javnega naročanja na voljo mnogo pobud, priročnikov in smernic, pa je Komisija zadnje sporočilo na področju družbeno odgovornih javnih naročilih predložila leta 2000, torej pred revizijo direktiv o javnih naročilih.
Whilst many initiatives have been taken and many manuals and guidelines are available in the area of ecologically responsible and energy-efficient procurement, the Commission’s most recent communication on socially responsible procurement dates back to 2000, i.e. prior to the revision of the public procurement directives.
Na pravno zelo zapletenem področju pravičnega javnega naročanja je doslej bilo pripravljeno samo eno sporočilo, na voljo pa ni nobenih smernic ali priročnikov.
In the legally particularly complex field of fair trade procurement, only one communication has thus far been issued, and no guidelines or manuals.
Posredno bi to lahko vodilo do napačnega razumevanja določanja prednostnih nalog v Komisiji.
This could be misconstrued as an indirect reflection of the Commission’s priorities.
Poročevalka zato poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju javnih naročil med različnimi službami Komisije in k skupni javno prepoznavni strategiji na področju javnih naročil, vključno z enotno prisotnostjo na spletu, da bi izboljšali preglednost zakonodaje.
Your rapporteur is therefore calling for better coordination of public procurement policy among the various Commission departments involved and the development of a joint, public strategy on public procurement, including a uniform web presence, with a view to making the law more transparent.
Poleg tega so zaželene tudi nadaljnje pobude za organizacijo izmenjave izkušenj, razvoj dobrih praks in metod ter podporo za programe usposabljanja v državah članicah.
More initiatives would also be welcome in the areas of the organisation of exchanges of experience, the development of proven practices and methods and support for training courses in the Member States.