natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
36. meni, da so nadaljnji ukrepi pomembni v zvezi z več politikami s finančnimi vplivi, kot so EMAS, javna naročila in ukrepi, sprejeti v odgovor na priporočila iz razrešnice za proračun; opozarja, da je potrebno nenehno nadaljnje ukrepanje in analiziranje izvrševanja proračuna Parlamenta na splošno;
Considers follow-up action to be important in relation to a number of policies with financial implications, such as EMAS, public procurement and action taken in response to budget discharge recommendations; emphasises the need for continuous follow-up and analysis of Parliament’s budget implementation in general;
Alexander Alvaro, Marta Andreasen, Francesca Balzani, James Elles, Göran Färm, José Manuel Fernandes, Eider Gardiazábal Rubial, Salvador Garriga Polledo, Jens Geier, Ingeborg Gräßle, Estelle Grelier, Carl Haglund, Jutta Haug, Monika Hohlmeier, Sidonia Elżbieta Jędrzejewska, Ivajlo Kalfin (Ivailo Kalfin), Alain Lamassoure, Giovanni La Via, Vladimír Maňka, Barbara Matera, Miguel Portas, Dominique Riquet, Helga Trüpel, Derek Vaughan, Jacek Włosowicz
Alexander Alvaro, Marta Andreasen, Francesca Balzani, James Elles, Göran Färm, José Manuel Fernandes, Eider Gardiazábal Rubial, Salvador Garriga Polledo, Jens Geier, Ingeborg Gräßle, Estelle Grelier, Carl Haglund, Isabelle Durant, Jutta Haug, Monika Hohlmeier, Sidonia Elżbieta Jędrzejewska, Ivailo Kalfin, Alain Lamassoure, Giovanni La Via, Vladimír Maňka, Barbara Matera, Miguel Portas, Dominique Riquet, Helga Trüpel, Derek Vaughan, Jacek Włosowicz
o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropske unije – boj proti goljufijam – letno poročilo 2009
on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests – Fight against fraud – Annual Report 2009
Poročevalec: Cătălin Sorin Ivan
Rapporteur: Cătălin Sorin Ivan
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 14. julija 2010 z naslovom „Zaščita finančnih interesov Skupnosti – Boj proti goljufijam – Letno poročilo 2009“ ( COM(2010)0382 ) ter priloženih dokumentov ( SEC(2010)0897 in SEC(2010)0898 ),
– having regard to the report of 14 July 2010 from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament entitled ‘Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Fight against fraud – Annual Report 2009’ ( COM(2010)0382 ) and its accompanying documents ( SEC(2010)0897 and SEC(2010)0898 ),
– ob upoštevanju desetega poročila o dejavnostih Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam za leto 2010,
– having regard to OLAF’s Tenth Activity Report – Annual Report 2010
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2009, skupaj z odgovori institucij,
– having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2009, together with the institutions’ replies
UL C 303, 9.11.2010, str.
OJ C 303, 9.11.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o dejavnostih, financiranih iz sedmega, osmega in devetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada za proračunsko leto 2009, skupaj z odgovori Komisije,
– having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the eighth, ninth and tenth European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2009, together with the Commission’s replies
– ob upoštevanju svoje pisne izjave z dne 18. maja 2010 o prizadevanjih Unije za boj proti korupciji,
– having regard to its Written Declaration of 18 May 2010 on the Union's efforts in combating corruption
P7_DCL(2010)0002 s čimer naj bi zagotovili, da sredstva EU ne postanejo predmet korupcije;
P7_DCL(2010)0002 , with a view to ensuring that EU funds are not subject to corruption;
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0050/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0050/2011 ),
5. obžaluje, da se velik delež sredstev EU še vedno porabi nepravilno, in poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme primerne ukrepe za takojšnjo izterjavo teh sredstev;
Deplores the fact that large amounts of EU funds are still wrongly spent and calls on the Commission to take appropriate action with a view to ensuring prompt recovery of those funds;
9. sprašuje, kakšne ukrepe je sprejela Komisija za boj proti vse večjemu številu in zneskih domnevnih goljufij v primerjavi s skupnim številom nepravilnosti v državah članicah Poljski, Romuniji in Bolgariji;
Asks what steps the Commission has taken to combat the increase in suspected fraud, in number of cases and amounts as compared to the total number of cases of irregularities in the Member States of Poland, Romania, and Bulgaria;
UL C 313, 23.10.1996, str.
OJ C 313, 23.10.1996, p.
1; UL C 151, 20.5.1997, str.
1, OJ C 151, 20.5.1997, p.
1 in UL C 221, 19.7.1997, str.
1 and OJ C 221, 19.7.1997, p.
11. namreč Češko republiko, Malto in Estonijo, naj to nemudoma storijo; poziva države članice, ki so omenjene pravne instrumente že ratificirale, naj si bolj prizadevajo izboljšati svojo kazensko zakonodajo, da bi zaščitile finančne interese Unije, zlasti z odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ki jih navaja drugo poročilo Komisije o izvajanju konvencije o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti in njenih protokolov ( COM(2008)0077 );
11. (the PIF instruments) i.e. the Czech Republic, Malta and Estonia, to proceed with the ratification of those legal instruments without delay; urges those Member States which have ratified the PIF instruments to step up their efforts to reinforce their national criminal legislation to protect the Union’s financial interests, in particular by addressing the existing shortcomings revealed in the second report from the Commission on Implementation of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ financial interests and its protocols ( COM(2008)0077 );
14. znova izraža obžalovanje – glede na resne dvome v zvezi s kakovostjo informacij, ki jih posredujejo države članice –, da si Komisija bolj prizadeva, da bi Evropski parlament prepričala o potrebnosti „sprejemljivega tveganja napak“, kot da bi državam članicam pojasnila, da morajo obvezno predložiti izjave o nacionalnem upravljanju, ki jih je ustrezno preveril nacionalni revizijski organ in potrdilo Računsko sodišče; poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami pripravi primerno poročilo v skladu s Pogodbo, s čimer bo Parlamentu dala razumno zagotovilo, da je bil ta cilj dosežen in da boj proti goljufijam poteka ustrezno;
Reiterates its regret – given the serious doubts about the quality of the information provided by the Member States – that the Commission puts more effort into convincing the European Parliament of the need to introduce a ‘tolerable risk of error’ than into persuading Member States of the need for mandatory national management declarations duly audited by the national audit office and consolidated by the Court of Auditors; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and by drawing up an appropriate report in line with the Treaty, to provide Parliament with a reasonable assurance that this objective has been attained and that action to combat fraud is being carried out properly;;
16. obžaluje pomanjkljivosti v nacionalnem carinskem nadzoru, ki jih je razkrilo Računsko sodišče – zlasti kar zadeva izvedbo analize tveganja pri izbiranju trgovcev in uvoženega blaga, za katere bo opravljen carinski pregled – saj povečujejo verjetnost nepravilnosti, ki niso nikdar odkrite, in lahko vodijo k izgubi tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev; države članice poziva, naj izboljšajo sisteme carinskega nadzora, Komisijo pa, naj jim pri tem ponudi potrebno podporo;
Deplores the deficiencies in national customs supervision revealed by the Court of Auditors – in particular as regards the performance of risk analysis for the selection of traders and imports to be subject to customs controls – which increase the risk of irregularities remaining undetected and could lead to a loss of Traditional Own Resources (TOR); calls on the Member States to strengthen their customs supervision systems and on the Commission to provide the relevant support in that respect;
19. pozdravlja tudi uspešen rezultat skupne carinske akcije Diabolo II, v kateri so sodelovali cariniki iz 13 azijskih držav in 27 držav članic EU, vodila pa jo je Komisija prek urada OLAF;
Welcomes the successful outcome of the joint customs operation Diabolo II, involving customs officials from 13 Asian countries and 27 EU Member States, coordinated by the European Commission through OLAF;
22. poziva Komisijo, naj pozorno spremlja razmere v Španiji in Italiji, ki sta poročali o največjem številu nepravilnosti oziroma o najvišjih zneskih nepravilnosti, ter Evropski parlament obvešča o posebnih ukrepih, ki sta jih ti državi sprejeli, da bi rešili omenjene težave;
Calls on the Commission to monitor closely the situation in Spain and Italy, which reported, respectively, the highest number of cases of irregularities and the highest amounts involved, and to report to the European Parliament on the specific measures undertaken in order to address the problems in those two Member States;
25. ugotavlja, da je mogoče dokončne podatke izračunati samo za tista proračunska leta, ki veljajo za zaključena, zadnje proračunsko leto, ki ga je mogoče šteti za zaključeno, pa je leto 2004;
Notes that final figures can only be established for those financial years that can be deemed finalised, and that in this light, to date, the most recent financial year that can be deemed finalised is 2004;
Odhodki: kohezijska politika
Expenditure: Cohesion Policy
28. je globoko zaskrbljen, da je Računsko sodišče pri plačilih za leto 2009 odkrilo precejšnjo stopnjo napak (več kot 5 %);
Is deeply concerned at the fact that payments for the year 2009 were found by the Court of Auditors to be affected by high material error (above 5%);
31. poziva Komisijo, naj Evropskemu parlamentu posreduje informacije o ukrepih, sprejetih v zvezi z nepravilnostmi, o katerih so poročale države članice oziroma jih je Komisija odkrila v tej skupini politik;
Calls on the Commission to provide the European Parliament with information on the measures that have been taken with regard to the irregularities reported by the Member States and detected by the Commission in this policy group;
Odhodki: predpristopna sredstva
Expenditure: Pre-accession funds
34. ugotavlja, da so Češka republika, Estonija, Latvija in Slovenija poročale o ničelni stopnji goljufij v okviru programa SAPARD, in dvomi o zanesljivosti poročil oziroma zmogljivosti teh držav za odkrivanje goljufij; poudarja, da bi bila lahko ničelna ali zelo nizka stopnja goljufij tudi znamenje pomanjkljivosti kontrolnih sistemov in obratno; poziva Komisijo, naj posreduje podatke o učinkovitosti kontrolnih mehanizmov in naj skupaj z uradom OLAF strožje nadzoruje porabo sredstev EU;
Notes that the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia and Slovenia reported a zero fraud rate for SAPARD, and questions the reliability of the reported information or the fraud detection capability of those States; underlines that similar zero or low level fraud rates could signify weaknesses in the control systems and vice versa; urges the Commission to provide data on effectiveness of control mechanisms and to implement, together with OLAF, stricter control on how EU money is spent;
Javna naročila, večja preglednost in boj proti korupciji
Public procurement, increased transparency and the fight against corruption
38. pozdravlja zeleno knjigo o modernizaciji politike javnega naročanja EU z naslovom „Za učinkovitejši evropski trg javnih naročil“; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj najpozneje do izteka leta 2012 dokončata reformo osnovnih pravil EU za javna naročila (direktivi 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES);
Welcomes the Commission’s Green Paper on the modernisation of EU public procurement policy ‘Towards a more efficient European Procurement Market’; calls on the Council and Commission to finalize the adoption of the reform of the basic EU public procurement rules (Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC) by no later than the end of 2012;
40. na osnovi svoje zahteve iz lanskega poročila o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti Svet poziva, naj čim prej sklene sporazum o sodelovanju z Lihtenštajnom ter naj Komisiji podeli mandat za pogajanja o sporazumih o boju proti goljufijam z Andoro, Monakom, San Marinom in Švico;
Following its request in the last year’s report on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests, urges the Council to complete the conclusion of the Cooperation Agreements with Liechtenstein in the shortest possible time and urges the Council to give the Commission a mandate to negotiate antifraud agreements with Andorra, Monaco, San Marino and Switzerland;
Člen 325 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije Evropski komisiji in državam članicam nalaga obveznost, da ščitijo finančne interese EU in se borijo proti goljufijam na področjih, kjer si Evropska unija in države članice odgovornost delijo.
Article 325 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union imposes on the European Commission and the Member States the obligation of protecting the EU’s financial interest and fighting against fraud in areas in which the responsibility is shared between the European Union and the Member States.
V skladu s členom 325(5) Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsako leto predloži poročilo o ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti zaradi izvajanja tega člena.
Pursuant to Article 325(5), the Commission, in cooperation with Member States, each year submits to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the measures taken for the implementation of that article.
Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom „Zaščita finančnih interesov Skupnosti – Boj proti goljufijam – Letno poročilo 2009“ ( COM(2010)0382 ) vsebuje povzetek statističnih podatkov o nepravilnostih, ki so jih države članice prijavile na tistih področjih, na katerih proračun izvršujejo same (kmetijska politika, kohezijska politika in predpristopna sredstva, tj. približno 80 % proračuna), ter pri zbiranju tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev EU.
Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Protection of the European Union’s financial interests- Fight against fraud - Annual report 2009 (COM(2010)382) provides a summary of statistics on irregularities reported by the Member States in those areas where Member States implement the budget (agricultural policy, cohesion policy and pre-accession funds, i.e. around 80% of the budget) and for the collection of EU’s traditional own resources.
Vsebuje tudi oceno nepravilnosti na področju odhodkov, ki jih neposredno upravlja Komisija, in pregled operativnih dejavnosti Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF).
It also gives an estimate of irregularities in the field of expenditure managed directly by the Commission and an overview of the operational activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office.
Podrobne podatke vsebuje delovni dokument služb Komisije z naslovom „Statistična ocena nepravilnosti – lastna sredstva, kmetijstvo, kohezijska politika, predpristopna sredstva in neposredni odhodki – leto 2009“ (SEC(2010)898), priložen omenjenemu poročilu.
Detailed data is contained in the document accompanying the aforementioned report in the form of a Commission staff working document - Statistical Evaluation of Irregularities-Own Resources, Agriculture, Cohesion Policy, Pre-Accession Funds and Direct Expenditure - Year 2009 (SEC(2010)898).
Poročilu je priložen tudi delovni dokument služb Komisije z naslovom „Izvajanje člena 325 v državah članicah v letu 2009“ (SEC(2010)897), ki se naslanja na odgovore držav članic na vprašalnik o členu 325, kot je bilo dogovorjeno z njimi v Svetovalnem odboru za usklajevanje preprečevanja goljufij (COCOLAF) in vsako leto prilagojeno izkušnjam, da se olajša spremljanje ukrepov proti goljufijam.
Another accompanying document is a Commission staff working document - Implementation of the article 325 by the Member States in 2009 (SEC(2010)897), which is based on the replies by the Member States to the “Article 325” questionnaire, as agreed upon with them within Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Fraud Prevention (COCOLAF) and adapted each year in the light of past experience so as to facilitate the monitoring of anti-fraud measures.
Še posebej neprimerno bi si bilo ustvariti preveč preprosto sliko o geografski porazdelitvi goljufij ali o učinkovitosti služb, ki prispevajo k zaščiti finančnih interesov.
It would be particularly inappropriate to draw simple conclusions about the geographical distribution of fraud or on the efficiency of the services which contribute to the protection of financial interests.
Teh ugotovitev ni mogoče imeti za empirične dokaze o obsegu goljufij in nepravilnosti.“
The findings cannot be considered as empirical evidence of the level of fraud and irregularity ."
Poročilo vsako leto pripravi tudi Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF), ki navaja informacije o svojih operativnih dejavnostih.
A report is also presented annually by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), which provides information on OLAF’s operational activities
Angleška različica letnega poročila urada OLAF' za leto 2010 je objavljena na tem naslovu: http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/reports/olaf/2009/en.pdf
English version of OLAF's Annual Report 2010 is published under the following link http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/reports/olaf/2009/en.pdf .
Po mnenju poročevalca si je sliko o stanju na področju zaščite finančnih interesov EU in boja proti goljufijam najprimerneje ustvariti na osnovi letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za leto 2009, ki je najzanesljivejši vir, poročili Komisije in urada OLAF pa služita predvsem kot vir dodatnih informacij o smernicah poročanja in primerih iz prakse.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that the most appropriate approach is to base conclusions with regard to the situation on the protection of EU’s financial interests and fight against fraud on the Annual Report by the Court of Auditors for the year 2009, which he finds to be the most reliable source of information, the Commission’s and OLAF’s reports serving mainly as auxiliary information on reporting tendencies and case-study.
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0142 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0142 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 207(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7–0135/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0135/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A7-0051/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A7-0051/2011 ),
Konferenca Združenih narodov o trgovini in razvoju (UNCTAD) je leta 1968 priporočila uvedbo „splošnega sistema preferencialov“, v skladu s katerim bi industrijsko razvite države enostransko dodelile trgovinske preferenciale vsem državam v razvoju, ne le nekdanjim kolonijam.
In 1968, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) recommended the creation of a "Generalized System of Preferences" (GSP) under which industrialised countries would grant trade preferences to all developing countries on a non-reciprocal basis, not just to former colonies.
GSP je bil od ustanovitve naprej eden osrednjih instrumentov trgovinske in razvojne politike EU, z njim pa se je državam v razvoju zagotavljala pomoč pri zmanjševanju revščine z ustvarjanjem prihodkov iz mednarodne trgovine.
Since its creation, the GSP has been one of the key EU trade and development policy instruments to assist developing countries reduce poverty by generating revenue through international trade.
Je najpogosteje uporabljen med vsemi sistemi razvitih držav.
It is the most used of such developed countries systems.
GSP proizvodom, uvoženim iz držav upravičenk GSP, omogoča bodisi brezcarinski dostop ali zmanjšanje tarif, odvisno od tega, kateri režim GSP velja za to državo.
The EU's GSP grants products imported from GSP beneficiary countries either duty-free access or a tariff reduction, depending on which of the GSP arrangements a country enjoys.
Za države upravičenke veljajo tri vrste režimov:
There are three types of arrangement in force for beneficiary countries:
2) poseben spodbujevalni režim za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje (GSP+) zagotavlja dodatne koristi za države, ki so ratificirale in začele izvajati seznam trenutno 27 mednarodnih konvencij in protokolov o človekovih in delovnopravnih pravicah, varstvu okolja, drogah in boju proti terorizmu;
2) the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance (the "GSP+") provides additional benefits for countries ratifying and implementing a list of currently 27 international conventions and protocols on human and labour rights, environmental protection, drugs and the fight against corruption;
3) poseben režim za najmanj razvite države, ki se imenuje tudi pobuda „Vse, razen orožja“ (EBA), zagotavlja najugodnejšo obravnavo za vse, s ciljem zagotavljanja, da imajo najmanj razvite države dostop do trga EU brez carin in omejevalnih kvot.
3) the special arrangement for the least-developed countries (LDCs), also known as the "Everything But Arms" (EBA) initiative, provides for the most favourable treatment of all, in the aim of granting the LDCs "duty-free and quota-free" access to the EU's market.
GSP se izvaja s pomočjo zaporednih uredb z veljavnostjo po tri leta.
The GSP is implemented through successive Regulations with a period of application of three years at a time.
Prva večletna izvedbena uredba je veljala od 1. januarja 2006 do 31. decembra 2008.
The first multi-annual implementing regulation was valid from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2008.
Druga uredba velja od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011.
The second is valid from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011.
Leta 2008 je bil predlog uredbe, ki je trenutno veljavna, v okviru postopka posvetovanja predan Parlamentu.
In 2008, the proposal for the regulation in force at this moment was referred to the Parliament under the consultation procedure.
Osnovne določbe prejšnje uredbe GSP so bile pregledane zaradi lažje uporabe sheme, a so ostale nespremenjene.
The basic provisions of the previous GSP Regulation remained unchanged but had been reviewed to facilitate the application of the scheme.
Žal Komisija v nasprotju z željami, ki jih je izrazil Parlament, svojega predloga ni posredovala dovolj hitro (do 1. junija 2007), da bi lahko Parlament v razumnem časovnem okviru v celoti sodeloval pri postopku posvetovanja.
Regrettably, and contrary to the wishes expressed by Parliament, the Commission did not transmit its proposal sufficiently in advance (by 1 June 2007) to enable the European Parliament to be fully consulted within a reasonable timescale.
Komisija je pravzaprav svoj predlog predstavila šele 21. decembra 2007.
In fact, the Commission presented its proposal only on 21 December 2007.
Zaradi tega je postopek posvetovanja z Evropskim parlamentom potekal preveč nepremišljeno.
Therefore, the process of consultation of the European Parliament was over-hasty.