natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dodana vrednost revizije poslovanja, ki jo izvaja Računsko sodišče, je torej učinkovito izboljšanje delovanja Evropske unije oziroma povečanje vrednosti proračunskih sredstev v okviru finančnega poslovodenja Unije.
However, the added value of the audit carried out by the Court of Auditors is the outcome in the form of improvements to the management of the European Union as well as increased accountability in relation to the management of EU funds.
Eden od načinov izvajanja nadzora v okviru Računskega sodišča je nadzor nad izvajanjem nalog, ki odgovarja na vprašanja, ali je bilo finančno poslovodenje pravilno, torej ali je bila zagotovljena najmanjša poraba sredstev (gospodarnost), če so bili na osnovi porabe danih sredstev zagotovljeni primerni rezultati (učinkovitost) in če so bili zastavljeni cilji uresničeni (uspešnost).
One of the types of audit carried out by the Court of Auditors is an evaluation of how responsibilities are carried out, which provides an answer to the question of whether financial management is proper, i.e. whether the minimum funds are being spent (economy), whether the appropriate results are being achieved with the use of specific resources (effectiveness) and whether the objectives set are being achieved (efficiency).
Treba je poudariti, da državljani Evropske unije in njihovi predstavniki v Evropskem parlamentu ne potrebujejo le potrditve, da so bili davki porabljeni namensko.
It should be emphasised here that EU citizens and their representatives in the European Parliament require not only assurances that their taxes have been used in the manner agreed, but also objective evidence that citizens’ needs have been met efficiently, to the greatest possible extent and at the lowest cost.
Potrebujejo tudi objektivne dokaze, da so bile njihove potrebe izpolnjene uspešno, tj. v največji možni meri in z najmanjšo porabo sredstev, ter smernice za nadaljnje izboljšanje sedanje učinkovitosti.
They also need pointers concerning future improvements to this efficiency.
Namen Računskega sodišča in dodana vrednost revizije poslovanja je torej zagotavljanje objektivnih in neodvisnih informacij in rezultatov glede stopnje, na kateri se izvaja nadzor nad dejavnostmi enot glede upoštevanja načel gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti.
Thus the aim of the Court of Auditors and the added value of the evaluation of how responsibilities are carried out is to provide objective and independent information, as well as recommendations, on the degree to which audited bodies are using EU resources in their activities in a manner that complies with the principles of economy, effectiveness and efficiency.
Na osnovi predstavitve danih predlogov Računsko sodišče prav tako nakaže tudi smernice in možnosti za nadaljnje izboljšanje obstoječe situacije, torej za nadaljnje ustvarjanje dodane vrednosti, in sicer na naslednji način:
However, by presenting its recommendations, the Court of Auditors also provides an indication as to how this activity can be improved and thus achieve added value for the future in the following ways:
· finančno varčevanje, predvsem pa omejevanje trošenja denarja,
· Financial savings, particularly in terms of avoiding waste,
· izboljšanje delovnih postopkov,
· Better working methods,
· doseganje zastavljenih ciljev na čim bolj učinkovit način.
· Achieving agreed objectives more effectively.
Zato morajo rezultati nadzora nad opravljenim delom, ki ga izvajajo Računsko sodišče in najvišji revizijski organi v državah članicah, po eni strani predstavljati pomembno informacijo za državljane Evropske unije, ki se nanaša na proračun teles, ki izvajajo javna naročila, po drugi strani pa so omenjeni rezultati dolžni zagotavljati objektivne temelje za možno spremembo obravnavane politike ali programa na sleherni stopnji njenega oziroma njegovega izvajanja: od priprave osnutka, uveljavitve le-tega v državah članicah do izvajanja v okviru institucij Evropske unije.
For this reason too the results of assessments of how responsibilities are carried out in the European Court of Auditors and the Supreme Chambers of Control of the Member States should, on the one hand, provide important information for EU citizens concerning the accountability of persons carrying out public duties and, on the other hand, should provide an objective basis for making adjustments to policies or programmes that are being evaluated at every step of their implementation: from the creation of assumptions to implementation in the Member States and the functioning of EU institutions.
Pomembno je torej, da so sklepi in predlogi naslovljeni na ustrezne skupine uporabnikov:
It is also important that conclusions and recommendations be directed to the appropriate recipients:
· na revidirance, z namenom seznanjanja in obveščanja o sprejetih ukrepih in njihovih učinkih,
· To the bodies being audited, in order to implement and provide information about activities undertaken and their effects,
· na nadzorne enote, z namenom morebitne uporabe v okviru operativnih posegov in odločitev na področju izvajanja nadzora,
· To those responsible for supervising the body in question, so that they can make use of the conclusions and recommendations in their operational activities and decisions,
· na Parlament, z namenom morebitne uporabe v okviru ocenjevalnih postopkov,
· To Parliament, so that it can make use of them in its assessment activities,
· na druge – z namenom informiranja in morebitne uporabe uspešnih metod ali upoštevanja na področju analize tveganj.
· To other interested parties, for information purposes, to enable good practice to be applied and risk analysis results to be taken into account.
Da bi izpopolnili uveljavljanje danih revizijskih sklepov in predlogov ter tako ustvariti pričakovano dodano vrednost, morajo biti sklepi in predlogi:
However, in order to facilitate the acceptance and implementation of audit conclusions and recommendations and, in effect, to obtain the anticipated added value, the conclusions and recommendations should be:
· jasni in jedrnati – razumljivi za uporabnika,
· expressed clearly and concisely, in a manner that is comprehensible to the recipient;
· konstruktivni – poudarjati morajo možnosti za izvedbo izboljšav,
· constructive – showing how improvements can be introduced;
· ustrezno naslovljeni in pravočasni – namenjeni enoti, organu idr., ki imajo možnosti upoštevanja sklepov in predlogov,
· addressed at the right time to the right body – addressed to the body or authority that is capable of implementing them;
· oprijemljivi – izhajati morajo iz potrjenega, dejanskega stanja,
· accurate – based on the facts uncovered;
· dosledni – temeljiti morajo na obstoječih dokazih.
· reliable – based on evidence collected.
Enota, nad katero se izvaja dodaten nadzor, mora biti v skladu z načeli o kontradiktornosti, dejavno soudeležena v procesih oblikovanja ugotovitev v revizijskih dokumentih, in sicer prek možnosti nasprotovanja ugotovitvam, navedenim v zapisniku o reviziji, ali ocenam, poudarkom in sklepom, ki jih navajajo porevizijska poročila.
In addition, the body being audited should, in accordance with the contradiction procedure, take an active part in the process of formulating findings in the audit documents through the possibility of submitting comments on findings contained in the inspection protocol and through assessments, comments and conclusions contained in post audit comments.
Poleg tega je nadzirana enota, zlasti v primeru ugotovitve nepravilnosti, dolžna poročati o načinu uporabe sklepov in predlogov ter o sprejetih ukrepih ali vzrokih za nesprejetje teh ukrepov.
In addition, particularly in circumstances where irregularities are uncovered, the body being audited should provide information as to how the conclusions and recommendations will be used or the reasons for not implementing such recommendations.
Iz člena 287 Lizbonske pogodbe sledi, da je sodelovanje med Računskim sodiščem, državnimi revizijskimi organi in Evropskim parlamentom zelo pomembno, kajti Računsko sodišče izvaja revizije vseh prihodkov in odhodkov Unije.
It can be seen from Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that cooperation between the Court of Auditors, National Audit Institutions and the European Parliament is very important, since the Court of Auditors audits all of the income and expenditure of the EU and of the bodies and organisational units created by the EU.
Prav tako izvaja revizije prihodkov in odhodkov vseh organov, uradov ali agencij, ki jih je ustanovila Unija.
For this reason, audits in the Member States are carried out together with national audit institutions.
Zato se revidiranje v državah članicah izvaja v povezavi z državnimi revizijskimi institucijami.
The Court works together with the national audit institutions of the Member States on the basis of mutual trust, while maintaining its independence.
Računsko sodišče in državne revizijske institucije držav članic sodelujejo na osnovi medsebojnega zaupanja, pri čemer ohranjajo svojo neodvisnost.
One of the values of the Court of Auditors, which arises from its mission and vision, is its professionalism with regard to cooperation.
Ena od vrednot Računskega sodišča, ki izhaja iz njegovega poslanstva in vizije ter se nanaša na sodelovanje, je strokovnost, temelječa na vlaganju v razvoj revidiranja, ki ga spremljajo javni organi v Evropski uniji in po celem svetu.
This encompasses an involvement in the growth of controls carried out by the public authorities in the European Union and throughout the world.
Prav tako tudi strategija nadzora Računskega sodišča kaže na sodelovanje z najvišjimi revizijskimi organi v Evropski uniji in na vzpostavljanje stikov z Evropskim parlamentom ter Svetom.
Similarly, the Court’s audit strategy encourages cooperation with the Supreme Audit Institutions in the European Union and growth of contacts with the European Parliament and the Council.
Menim, da je sodelovanje med Računskim sodiščem, državnimi revizijskimi organi in Evropskim parlamentom nujno, kajti nobena institucija za revidiranje ne razpolaga s sredstvi, ki bi omogočali izvajanje nadzora nad vsemi transakcijami.
In my opinion, cooperation between the Court of Auditors, the national audit institutions and the European Parliament is essential, since no single audit institution has the resources to carry out controls of all transactions.
Omenjeno sodelovanje mora potekati na osnovi ohranitve neodvisnosti vsake posamezne institucije in prispevati k uresničevanju skupnih, praktičnih pobud, ki si prizadevajo razviti metodologijo revizije, mednarodne revizijske standarde in revizijsko prakso.
This cooperation should take place in such a way as to allow each institution to maintain its independence and should encourage the realisation of joint practical initiatives aimed at developing audit methods, international audit standards and practices.
Pri tem igra pomembno vlogo kontaktni odbor, ki mora svojo vlogo ohraniti tudi v prihodnje.
In this regard, the Contact Committee plays and should continue to play an important role.
Sestavljajo ga vodje najvišjih državnih revizijskih organov v državah članicah in Računskega sodišča.
It consists of representatives of the heads of the Supreme Audit Institutions of the Member States and the Court of Auditors.
Njegova naloga je izmenjava znanja in izkušenj s področja nadzora nad sredstvi Evropske unije, spodbujanje in usklajevanje izvajanja revizije v zadevah Unije, priprava stališč glede novih vprašanj, povezanih z nadzorom znotraj Evropske unije in izmenjava informacij med institucijami izven kontaktnega odbora.
Its purpose is the exchange of knowledge and experience as regards controls of EU funds, the initiation and coordination of audit functions in EU matters, the preparation of opinions on new auditing issues in the European Union and the exchange of information with institutions outside the committee.
Dobra smernica za izboljšanje sodelovanja je tudi uvajanje in razvoj pojma single audit (enotna revizija), ki temelji na uporabi dela drugih revizorjev, pri čemer se upošteva: skladnost s splošno uveljavljenimi standardi in dostopnost rezultatov revizije v zahtevanem času.
A good direction for improving cooperation is the implementation and development of the concept of the single audit, which involves using the work of other auditors, while at the same time maintaining compliance with commonly accepted standards and the availability of audit results within the timeframe required.
Zato je pomembno, da se spodbuja delovno skupino kontaktnega odbora, ki je zadolžena za pripravo skupnih revizijskih standardov in primerjalnih revizijskih meril, ki se uporabljajo posebej za primer Evropske unije.
For this reason it is important to support the work of the Contact Committee’s working group, which is responsible for developing common audit standards as well as comparable audit criteria adapted for the specific characteristics of the European Union.
To Računskemu sodišču omogoča, da se lahko v večji meri zanaša na delo državnih revizijskih organov, Evropskemu parlamentu pa to posledično zagotavlja večji izbor uporabnih informacij.
This will allow the Court of Auditors to depend to a greater extent on the work of national audit institutions and will, as a result, provide the European Parliament with a greater quantity of useful information.
Prav tako je pomembno – v primeru večjih sredstev Evropske unije, dodeljenih državam članicam, s katerimi le-te razpolagajo – uvajanje skupnih oblik revizije in revizije na osnovi enovitih, okvirnih programov revizije.
It is also important, in circumstances where large sums of EU funds are being allocated to Member States and are being managed and audited by those Member States, to carry out joint audits or for audits to be carried out on the basis of unified framework audit programmes.
Informacije, pridobljene na osnovi tovrstnega revizije, so lahko za Evropski parlament zelo uporabne, in sicer zaradi morebitne uporabe posredovanih rezultatov.
Information from such audits can be very useful for the European Parliament, which can make use of the conclusions submitted.
Poleg tega je potrebno prepričati nacionalne parlamente, da bi se le-ti v svojih državah v večji meri zavzeli za vprašanja, povezana s porabo sredstev Unije in da bi spodbujali državne revizijske organe pri izvajanju nalog na tem področju.
In addition, national parliaments should be urged to engage to a greater extent in the use of EU funds in their countries and also to encourage national audit institutions to carry out audits in this area.
Evropski parlament in Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor bi lahko v tej smeri nadaljevala svoje delo, na primer organizirala izmenjavo izkušenj med ustreznimi parlamentarnimi odbori in spodbudila uporabo dobrih praks.
The European Parliament and its Committee on Budgetary Control could continue working in this area, for example, by organising an exchange of experiences between the appropriate parliamentary committees and by encouraging the spread of good practice.
Tako razumljeno sodelovanje bo imelo po eni strani pozitiven vpliv na izboljšanje upravljanja s sredstvi Evropske unije, po drugi strani pa bo omogočilo prepoznati in rešiti praktične ter tehnične probleme, povezane s sodelovanjem.
Cooperation understood in this way would have a positive effect on the one hand in improving the administration of EU funds and on the other hand would make it possible to identify and resolve practical and technical problems relating to cooperation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se zdi, da bosta okrepitev in izboljšanje sodelovanja mogoča pod naslednjimi pogoji:
In the light of the above it would seem that it would be possible to strengthen and improve cooperation by the following actions, among others:
· ob uporabi vseh dosedanjih izkušenj v okviru kontaktnega odbora,
· Using all the experience gained from the activities of the Contact Committee to date,
· ob uporabi skupnih mednarodnih revizijskih standardov,
· Applying common international audit standards,
· ob usklajenosti programov revizije, z upoštevanjem ocene sistema notranje revizije,
· Agreeing audit programmes, including an assessment of the internal audit system,
· ob pripravi skupnih meril za ocenjevanje kakovosti opravljenega dela državnih revizijskih organov, z namenom povečati možnosti za uporabo dobljenih rezultatov,
· Developing common guidelines for assessing the quality of work carried out by national audit institutions in order to strengthen the possibility of using their results,
· ob spodbujanju nacionalnih parlamentov pri uvajanju revizije na področju porabe sredstev Unije,
· Encouraging national parliaments to promote controls on the use of EU funds,
· ob preučitvi rezultatov revidiranja s strani Računskega sodišča in državnih revizijskih institucij na sejah Odbora Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor,
· Discussing the results of the audits carried out by the Court of Auditors as well as national audit institutions at meetings of the Committee on Budgetary Control,
· ob zagotovitvi pravočasno opravljenih del z namenom ustvariti pogoje za uporabo dobljenih rezultatov.
· Ensuring work is done on time so that it is possible to benefit from findings.
Upam, da bo Evropski parlament podal pozitivno mnenje o moji kandidaturi, čeprav moram biti vseeno pripravljen, da mnenje Parlamenta ne bo pozitivno.
I would hope that the European Parliament will issue a favourable opinion on my appointment, but of course I should take into consideration the possibility of the opinion being unfavourable.
V zgornjih odgovorih sem veliko pozornosti namenil potrebi po uspešnem sodelovanju med Evropskim parlamentom in Računskim sodiščem.
Earlier, I wrote about the need for good cooperation between the European Parliament and the Court of Auditors.
Umik moje kandidature za člana v primeru negativnega mnenja Parlamenta o mojem imenovanju bi tovrstno sodelovanje zagotovo otežil.
It would no doubt be the case that a failure to withdraw the candidacy of a Member who had received an unfavourable opinion would make such cooperation more difficult.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno menim, da je pravilen pristop v primeru negativnega mnenja, da se obrnem na vlado Republike Poljske in predlagam ponovno preučitev moje kandidature ali da se predlaga druga oseba.
In the light of the above, if the opinion were unfavourable, the correct course of action would be to approach the Government of the Republic of Poland to reconsider my candidacy or to suggest another person.
o predlaganju Louisa Galee za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Louis Galea as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS LOUISA GALEE
ANNEX 1: CURRICULUM VITAE OF Louis Galea
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI LOUISA GALEE NA VPRAŠALNIK
ANNEX 2: ANSWERS BY Louis Galea TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE
– ob upoštevanju člena 286(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0020/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0020/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7‑0042/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0042/2010 ),
A. ker Loius Galea izpolnjuje pogoje, ki jih določa člen 286(1) PDEU,
A. whereas Louis Galea fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
Osebni podatki
Personal information
Datum rojstva
Date of birth
Predsednik predstavniškega doma
Speaker of the House of Representatives
• Glavne dejavnosti in pristojnosti
• Main activities and responsibilities
Maja 2008 je bil soglasno izvoljen za predsednika enodomnega malteškega parlamenta.
Unanimously elected Speaker of Malta’s unicameral Parliament in May 2008.
Dolžnosti predsednika vključujejo nepristransko in neodvisno predsedovanje predstavniškemu domu ter spodbujanje ustreznega vzdušja za pozitiven dialog med vlado in opozicijo.
The Speaker’s duties include presiding over the House of Representatives with an impartial and independent mindset and fostering a proper atmosphere for a positive dialogue between the Government and the Opposition.
Predsednik zagotavlja, da Parlament lahko podrobno pregleduje in nadzira odgovornosti vlade za finančno upravljanje in uporabo javnih sredstev.
The Speaker ensures that Parliament is able to scrutinize and hold the Government accountable for the financial management and use made of public funds.
Za dosego tega cilja se predsednik povezuje z različnimi parlamentarnimi odbori in jim zagotavlja podporo, vključno z odborom za javne finance, uradniki predstavniškega doma, glavnim revizorjem, ki vodi nacionalni revizijski urad, ter varuhom človekovih pravic.
To achieve this objective the Speaker liaises with and supports different Parliamentary Committees, including the Public Accounts Committee, and officers of the House of Representatives, including the Auditor General, who heads the National Audit Office, and the Ombudsman.
Član ministrskih kabinetov, ki jih je vodil predsednik vlade Edward Fenech Adami med letoma 1987 in 1996 ter med letoma 1998 in 2004, in član ministrskega kabineta predsednika vlade Lawrenca Gonzija med letoma 2004 in 2008.
A member of the Cabinets led by Prime Minister Edward Fenech Adami between 1987 and 1996 and between 1998 and 2004 as well as those of Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi between 2004 and 2008.
Poleg tega član različnih odborov kabinetov, vključno z odbori, pristojnimi za pridružitev EU, reformo javnih služb, pokojninsko reformo (predsednik) ter proračunsko načrtovanje in prednostne naloge.
Also a member of various Cabinet Committees including those responsible for EU Accession, the Public Service Reform, the Pensions Reform (chairperson) and Budget Planning and Priorities.
Strateško, organizacijsko, trženjsko, poslovodno in komunikacijsko strokovno znanje in veščine s poudarkom na kulturni spremembi, spreminjanju in prestrukturiranju javnih organizacij ter razvoju človeških virov.
Strategic, organisational, marketing, management and communication skills with emphasis on culture change, transformation and restructuring of public organisations and human resources development.
Prizadeval si je za uvedbo kulture upravljanja, usmerjenega v rezultate, sistemov upravljanja kakovosti in odgovornosti, modelov upravljanja odnosov, varstva strank, trženja in poslovnega načrtovanja.
Worked to introduce performance management cultures, quality management and accountability systems, relationship management models, customer care, marketing and business planning.
Kot minister je bil več let dejavno vključen v prizadevanja za reforme malteške javne uprave in javnega sektorja, ki so zagotovile kakovostnejšo upravo.
Over the years as Minister he was actively committed to and involved in Malta’s public service and public sector reforms guaranteeing a better quality administration.
Zaradi portfeljev v svoji pristojnosti je nadzoroval izvrševanje znatnega deleža nacionalnega proračuna.
Due to the portfolios held, he oversaw the implementation of a substantial percentage of the national budget.
V skladu z vladnimi politikami in skupaj z vodji oddelkov, uradov in agencij v pristojnosti njegovih različnih portfeljev je deloval za okrepitev ustreznih mehanizmov pristojnosti nadzora, da bi zagotovil izvajanje programov in porabo dodeljenih proračunskih sredstev na zakonit in pravilen način ter v skladu z dobrim finančnim poslovodenjem.
In line with Government policies, and together with the heads of departments, offices and agencies falling within his various portfolios, he worked to strengthen the relative mechanisms of powers of control to ensure that the programmes were implemented and the allocated budget spent in a lawful and regular manner and according to sound financial management.
Bogate izkušnje s komuniciranjem in pogajanjem s sindikati, združenji delodajalcev, javnimi organi in agencijami, prostovoljnimi organizacijami ter civilno družbo na splošno.
Substantial experience of communicating and negotiating with trade unions, constituted bodies, public authorities and agencies, voluntary organizations and civil society at large.
Minister za izobraževanje in zaposlovanje
Minister of Education and Employment