natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če BERT poda mnenje, kjer ugotovi, da je treba osnutek ukrepa spremeniti, lahko Komisija ob čim večjem upoštevanju tega mnenja, sprejme utemeljen sklep, v katerem od zadevnega nacionalnega regulativnega organa zahteva, naj spremeni osnutek ukrepa, in v ta namen poda posebne predloge.
If the opinion of BERT indicates that the proposed measure should be amended, the Commission may, taking full account of this opinion, adopt a reasoned decision requiring the national regulatory authority concerned to amend the proposed measure, submitting specific proposals to this effect.
Če BERT v svojem mnenju potrdi ustreznost in učinkovitost predloženega ukrepa, ga lahko zadevni nacionalni regulativni organ sprejme, pri tem pa v celoti upošteva vsa priporočila, ki sta jih podala Komisija in BERT.
If the opinion of BERT confirms the suitability and effectiveness of the proposed measure, the national regulatory authority concerned may adopt the proposed measure, taking full account of all the recommendations of the Commission and BERT.
Če osnutek ukrepa zadeva naložitev, spremembo ali umik obveznost iz členov 13a in 13b Direktive 2002/19/ES (direktiva o dostopu), se sprejetje predloga ukrepa odloži za nadaljnja dva meseca po poteku roka iz člena 7(3).
If the proposed measure concerns the imposition, amendment or withdrawal of an obligation under Articles 13a and 13b of Directive 2002/19/EC (Access Directive), the adoption of the proposed measure shall be postponed by a further two months after the expiry of the deadline laid down in Article 7(3).
V obdobju teh dveh mesecev Komisija, BERT in ustrezni nacionalni regulativni organ tesno sodelujejo, da bi opredelili najbolj učinkovit in ustrezen ukrep za dosego ciljev iz člena 8, pri tem pa upoštevajo mnenja udeležencev na trgu in potrebo po zagotavljanju dosledne regulativne prakse.
During that two month period, the Commission, BERT and the national regulatory authority concerned shall cooperate closely in order to identify the most effective and suitable measure to achieve the objectives set out in Article 8, taking account of the opinions of market operators and the need to ensure consistent regulatory practice.
V istem obdobju lahko BERT z navadno večino sprejme obrazloženo mnenje, v katerem potrdi, da je osnutek ukrepa priporočljiv in učinkovit, ali nakaže, da ga ne bi smeli izvajati.
During the same period, BERT may, by simple majority, issue a reasoned opinion confirming the suitability and effectiveness of the draft measure, or indicate that it should not be implemented.
Ko Komisija in BERT potrdita ustreznost in učinkovitost predloženega ukrepa, ga lahko zadevni nacionalni regulativni organ sprejme, pri tem pa v celoti upošteva vsa priporočila, ki sta jih podala Komisija in BERT.
After confirmation by the Commission and BERT of the suitability and effectiveness of the proposed measure, the national regulatory authority concerned may adopt that measure, taking full account of all the recommendations of the Commission and BERT.
V roku treh mesecev potem, ko je Komisija v skladu z odstavkom 3 sprejela utemeljen sklep, ki od ustreznega nacionalnega regulativnega organa zahteva spremembo predloženega ukrepa, ga nacionalni regulativni organ spremeni ali umakne.
Within three months of the adoption by the Commission of a reasoned decision under paragraph 3 requiring the national regulatory authority concerned to amend a proposed measure, the national regulatory authority should amend or withdraw the proposed measure.
Če je predlog ukrepa spremenjen, začne nacionalni regulativni organ v skladu s postopki iz člena 6 javno posvetovanje in Komisiji v skladu z odstavkom 7 ponovno priglasi spremenjeni osnutek ukrepa.
If the proposed measure is amended, the national regulatory authority shall carry out public consultation pursuant to Article 6 and refer the proposed measure as amended back to the Commission pursuant to Article 7.
Predlog za postopek skupne regulacije temelji na tesnem sodelovanju med Komisijo, BERT in nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi.
A new ‘coregulation’ procedure is proposed based on close cooperation between the Commission, the BERT and the national regulatory authorities.
Ta postopek namesto „sankcijskega“ veta z vrha predvideva obravnavo med enakovrednimi udeleženci za dosego rešitve.
Rather than a ‘sanction’ veto imposed from above, this procedure involves consideration by peers in order to achieve a solution.
Da bi se dosegli sklepi v skladu s tem, mora Komisija soglašati z BERT (glasovanje z navadno večino) o potrebi, da se ukrep, ki ga je predlagal nacionalni regualtivni organ, spremeni.
In order for the Commission to take a decision along these lines, the Commission and the BERT (by simple majority vote) must agree on the need to amend a measure proposed by a national regulatory authority.
Sicer mora nacionalni regulativni organ v celoti upoštevati pripombe Komisije in BERT.
Otherwise, the national regulatory authority must take full account of observations by the Commission and BERT.
Člen 1 ‑ točka 6
Article 1 ‑ point 6
Člen 7‑ odstavek 2
Article 7‑ paragraph 2
Nacionalni regulativni organi prispevajo k razvoju notranjega trga tako, da sodelujejo s Komisijo in z organom, da v vseh državah članicah zagotovijo dosledno uporabo določb te direktive in posebnih direktiv.
National regulatory authorities shall contribute to the development of the Internal Market by working with the Commission and the Authority so as to ensure the consistent application, in all Member States, of the provisions of this Directive and the Specific Directives.
V ta namen zlasti sodelujejo s Komisijo in organom, da opredelijo vse vrste instrumentov in sredstev, ki bi bili najprimernejši za reševanje posebnih razmer na trgu.
To this end, they shall, in particular, work with the Commission and the Authority to identify the types of instruments and remedies best suited to address particular types of situations in the marketplace.
Nacionalni regulativni organi prispevajo k razvoju notranjega trga tako, da na pregleden način sodelujejo s Komisijo in z organom, da v vseh državah članicah zagotovijo dosledno uporabo določb te direktive in posebnih direktiv.
National regulatory authorities shall contribute to the development of the Internal Market by working with the Commission and the Authority in a transparent manner so as to ensure the consistent application, in all Member States, of the provisions of this Directive and the Specific Directives.
Člen 7 – odstavek 4 – točka c
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point c
Pravico veta nadomesti mehanizem iz člena 6a (novo).
The veto is replaced by the mechanism set out in Article 6a (new).
Pravico veta v zvezi z ukrepi nadomesti mehanizem iz člena 6a (novo).
The veto on remedies is replaced by the mechanism set out in Article 6a (new).
Člen 7‑ odstavek 8
Article 7‑ paragraph 8
Da bi povečali doslednost, vendar pri tem ne bi spremenili občutljivega institucionalnega razmerja moči ali spodkopali subsidiarnih elementov uredbe, bi morala Komisija igrati vlogo razsodnika, ne sodnika.
To improve consistency, without altering the delicate institutional balance of powers or undermining the subsidiarity elements of the Regulation, the Commission should play the role of an arbitrator rather than of a judge.
Člen 7 – odstavek 9
Article 7 – paragraph 9
Nacionalni regulativni organ Komisiji sporoči vse končne ukrepe, ki spadajo pod člen 7(3) .
The national regulatory authority shall communicate to the Commission all final measures which fall under Article 7(3).
Pravico veta v zvezi z ukrepi nadomesti mehanizem iz člena -7a (novo).
The veto on remedies is replaced by the mechanism contained in Article -7a (new).
Člen 8 − odstavek 2 – točka b
Article 8 − paragraph 2 – point b
Člen 1 ‑ točka 8 ‑ točka b a (novo)
Article 1 ‑ point 8 ‑ point b a (new)
Člen 8 ‑ odstavek 2 ‑ točka c
Article 8 ‑ paragraph 2 ‑ point c
(ba) V odstavku 2 se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
( ba) In paragraph 2, point (c) shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1 – točka 8 − točka e
Article 1 – point 8 − point e
Člen 8 – odstavek 4 – točka g a (novo)
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point g a (new)
(ga) zagotavljajo sodelovanje podjetij, ki so ponudniki omrežij in storitev elektronskih komunikacij, s sektorji, ki se ukvarjajo z zaščito in spodbujanjem zakonitih vsebin v elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežjih in storitvah.
(ga) ensuring the cooperation of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services with the sectors interested in the protection and the promotion of lawful content over electronic communication networks and services.
Zagotovijo, da nacionalni regulativni organi razporedijo in dodelijo take radijske frekvence na podlagi objektivnih, preglednih, nediskriminacijskih in sorazmernih meril.
They shall ensure that the allocation and assignment of such radiofrequencies by national regulatory authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
Zagotovijo, da nacionalni regulativni organi razporedijo in dodelijo takšne radijske frekvence na podlagi objektivnih, preglednih, nediskriminacijskih in sorazmernih meril , in preprečijo izkrivljanje konkurence .
They shall ensure that the allocation and assignment of such radiofrequencies by national regulatory authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria and avoid distorting competition .
Za učinkovito upravljanje radijskih frekvenc za elektronske komunikacije morajo pristojni organi pri razporeditvi in dodelitvi radijskih frekvenc upoštevati vidike konkurenčnosti in preprečevati njeno izkrivljanje.
Effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communication services should require the competent authorities to take into account competition aspects when allocation and assigning radio frequencies and avoid any distortions to competition.
Predlagano besedilo se ujema z besedilom uvodne izjave 28 predloga Komisije za okvirno direktivo.
The proposed wording is consistent with that in recital 28 of the Commission's proposal for the framework directive.
Člen 9 – odstavek 3 – točka b a (novo)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) preprečevanja izkrivljanja konkurence,
(ba) avoid distortion of competition,
Člen 9 – odstavek 4 – pododstavek 1
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Razen če ni drugače določeno v drugem pododstavku ali v ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9c, države članice zagotovijo, da se v radiofrekvenčnih pasovih, odprtih za elektronske komunikacije, nudijo vse vrste elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph or in the measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c, Member States shall ensure that all types of electronic communications services may be provided in the radio frequency bands open to electronic communications.
Razen če ni drugače določeno v drugem pododstavku ali v ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9c, države članice zagotovijo, da se v radiofrekvenčnih pasovih, ki so na voljo za storitve elektronske komunikacije , kot so opredeljene v nacionalnih tabelah za dodelitev frekvenc ter v predpisih Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze, nudijo vse vrste elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph or in the measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c, Member States shall ensure that all types of electronic communications services may be provided in the radio frequency bands available to electronic communications services as identified in their national allocation tables and in ITU radio broadcasting regulations .
Nevtralnost storitev je treba omejiti na možnosti iz predpisov o radiokomunikacijah Mednarodne zveze za telekomunikacije, ki določa, katere storitve so lahko hkrati v različnih pasovih.
Service neutrality must be limited to the possibilities provided by ITU radio broadcasting regulations determining which services can operate together within the various band widths.
Člen 9 − odstavek 4 – pododstavek 2
Article 9 − paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Omejitve, ki zahtevajo , da se storitev zagotovi v določenem pasu, so upravičene z namenom, da zagotovijo izpolnitev cilja splošnega interesa v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, kot je varstvo človekovega življenja, spodbujanje socialne, regionalne ali teritorialne kohezije, preprečevanje neučinkovite uporabe radijskih frekvenc ali spodbujanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter medijskega pluralizma, kot je opredeljeno v nacionalni zakonodaji v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti .
Restrictions that require a service to be provided in a specific band shall be justified in order to ensure the fulfilment of a general interest objective in conformity with Community law, such as safety of life, the promotion of social, regional or territorial cohesion, the avoidance of inefficient use of radio frequencies, or, as defined in national legislation in conformity with Community law, the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism.
Ukrepi, ki zahtevajo, da se posebna elektronska povezovalna storitev zagotovi v določenem pasu, so upravičeni samo z namenom, da zagotovijo izpolnitev cilja splošnega interesa , kot je opredeljeno v nacionalni zakonodaji, v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, kot je varstvo človekovega življenja, spodbujanje socialne, regionalne ali teritorialne kohezije, preprečevanje neučinkovite uporabe radijskih frekvenc ali spodbujanje kulturnih in medijskih političnih ciljev, kot so kulturna in jezikovna raznolikost ter medijski pluralizem ali zagotavljanje storitev radijskega in televizijskega oddajanja .
Restrictions that require a particular electronic communication service to be provided in a specific band shall be justified only in order to ensure the fulfilment of a general interest objective as defined in national legislation in conformity with Community law, such as safety of life, the promotion of social, regional or territorial cohesion, the avoidance of inefficient use of radio frequencies, the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism or the provision of radio and television broadcasting services .
Člen 9 − odstavek 4 – pododstavek 3
Article 9 − paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Omejitev, ki prepoveduje zagotavljanje katere koli druge storitve elektronske komunikacije v določenem pasu, se uporablja samo, če je upravičena s potrebo po varstvu človekovega življenja , ali da bi se zagotovila uresničitev javnega interesa, kot je opredeljeno v nacionalni zakonodaji v skladu z zakonodajo skupnosti, na primer s spodbujanjem kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter medijskega pluralizma.
A restriction which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communication service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services or to ensure the fulfilment of a general interest as defined in national legislation in conformity with Community law, such as the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism .
Pomembno je, da države članice še naprej opredeljujejo kulturno in medijsko politiko in da se pri tem zagotovijo pravna varovala in prožnost na nacionalni ravni.
It is important that the definition of cultural and media policies remains in the hands of Member States and that legal safeguards and flexibility on national level are guaranteed in this matter.
Direktiva 2002/21/EC
Directive 2002/21/EC
Člen 9 − odstavek 5
Article 9 − paragraph 5
Opredelitev ciljev in narave vseh izjem je v pristojnosti držav članic.
It lies within the competence of the Member States to define the scope and nature of any exception.
Člen 9a – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 9a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Za obdobje petih let, ki se začne [datum prenosa] , lahko države članice zagotovijo, da lahko imetniki pravic uporabe radijskih frekvenc, ki so bile dodeljene pred navedenim datumom za obdobje petih let, vložijo zahtevek za ponovno presojo omejitev njihovih pravic v skladu s členom 9(3) in (4).
For a period of five years starting on [date of transposition] , Member States may ensure that holders of rights to use radio frequencies which were granted before that date may for a period of five years submit an application to the competent national regulatory authority for a reassessment of the restrictions to their rights in accordance with Article 9(3) and (4).
Za pravice, ki potečejo pred koncem petletnega prehodnega obdobja, ne bi smela biti potrebna ponovna presoja.
No review should be necessary regarding rights expiring before the end of the five-year transitional period.
Člen 9a – odstavek 2
Article 9a – paragraph 2
Del radijskih frekvenc, ki ni nujen za izpolnitev navedenega cilja kot rezultat uporabe členov 9(3) in (4), je predmet novega postopka podeljevanja v skladu s členom 7(2) Direktive o odobritvi.
The part of the radio frequencies which becomes unnecessary for the fulfilment of that objective as a result of application of Article 9(3) and (4) shall be subject to a new assignment procedure in conformity with Article 7(2) of the Authorisation Directive.
Kadar je imetnik pravic iz odstavka 1 ponudnik storitev radijskih ali televizijskih radiodifuzijskih vsebin in je bila pravica do uporabe radijskih frekvenc dodeljena za izpolnjevanje posebnega cilja splošnega interesa, vključno z zagotavljanjem storitev oddajanja, ostane del radijskih frekvenc, ki je nujen za izpolnitev takega cilja nespremenjen do izteka .
Where the right holder mentioned in paragraph 1 is a provider of radio or television broadcast content services, and the right to use radio frequencies has been granted for the fulfilment of a specific general interest objective, including the supply of broadcasting services, the right to use the part of the radio frequencies which is necessary for the fulfilment of such objective shall remain unchanged until its expiry .
Del radijskih frekvenc, ki ni nujen za izpolnitev navedenega cilja , je predmet novega postopka podeljevanja v skladu s členoma 9(3) in (4) te direktive ter členom 7(2) Direktive 2002/20/EC ( Direktiva o odobritvi ) .
The part of the radio frequencies which becomes unnecessary for the fulfilment of that objective shall be included in a new assignment procedure under Article 9(3) and (4) of this Directive and Article 7(2) of Directive 2002/20/EC ( the Authorisation Directive ) .
Upravljavci bi morali imeti možnost nadaljevanja z razvojem storitev oddajanja (na primer z visoko ločljivostjo) tudi po prehodu na digitalno tehnologijo.
Operators should be able to continue offering and further developing (for example through HD TV) their broadcasting services after transition to digital technology.
Neuporabljeno digitalno dividendo za oddajanje je treba preusmeriti na druge cilje novih pravil.
The digital dividend which is not used for broadcasting should be reassigned to other purposes under the new rules.
Člen 9b – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 9b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko podjetja prenesejo ali dajo v zakup drugim podjetjem individualne pravice uporabe radijskih frekvenc v pasovih, za katere je to določeno v izvedbenih ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9c, brez predhodnega soglasja nacionalnega regulativnega organa.
Member States shall ensure that undertakings may transfer or lease to other undertakings individual rights to use radio frequencies in the bands for which this is provided in the implementing measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c without the prior consent of the national regulatory authority .
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko podjetja prenesejo ali dajo v zakup drugim podjetjem individualne pravice uporabe radijskih frekvenc v pasovih, za katere je to določeno v izvedbenih ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9c, pod pogojem, da je ta prenos ali zakup v skladu z nacionalnimi postopki in ne spreminja storitve, ki se zagotavlja na teh frekvencah .
Member States shall ensure that undertakings may transfer or lease to other undertakings individual rights to use radio frequencies in the bands for which this is provided in the implementing measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c , provided that the transfer or lease is in accordance with national procedures and that the change does not affect the service provided within those bands .
Spreminjanje radijskih frekvenc ne bi smelo povzročati nesorazmerij ali špekulacij pri raznolikosti storitev.
Radio frequency interchangeability should not lead to any imbalance regarding service diversity or to speculation.
Vendar ne bi smeli prezreti nacionalnih postopkov, saj upravljanje spektra ostaja v nacionalni pristojnosti.
However, national procedures cannot be ignored since spectrum management is the responsibility of the national authorities.
Da bi prispevala k razvoju notranjega trga, za doseganje načel tega člena, Komisija lahko sprejme ustrezne izvedbene ukrepe za:
In order to contribute to the development of the internal market, for the achievement of the principles of this Article, the Commission may adopt appropriate implementing measures to:
Da bi prispevala k razvoju notranjega trga in brez poseganja v člen 8a , za doseganje načel tega člena, lahko Komisija sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe za:
In order to contribute to the development of the internal market, and without prejudice to Article 8a , for the achievement of the principles of this Article, the Commission may adopt appropriate technical implementing measures to:
(-a) uskladitev pravil o razpoložljivosti in učinkoviti uporabi radijskih frekvenc v skladu s postopkom iz Priloge IIa;
(-a) harmonise the rules relating to the availability and efficient use of radio frequencies in accordance with the procedure set out in A nnex IIa;
(-aa) zagotovitev koordiniranega in pravočasnega zbiranja informacij glede razporeditve, razpoložljivosti in uporabe radijskih frekvenc v skladu s postopkom iz Priloge IIa;
(-aa) ensure the coordinated and timely provision of information concerning the allocation, availability and use of radio frequencies in accordance with the procedure set out in Annex IIa;
(a) opredelitev pasov, za katere je dovoljen prenos ali dajanje v zakup pravice uporabe med podjetji z izjemo radijskih frekvenc, ki so jih države članice dodelile, ali jih načrtujejo za oddajne storitve;
(a) identify the bands for which usage rights may be transferred or leased between undertakings , excluding radio frequencies allocated or planned by Member States for broadcasting services ;
(c) uskladitev posebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev poštene konkurence, kjer so individualne pravice prenesene;
(c) harmonise the specific measures to ensure fair competition where individual rights are transferred ;
(c) uskladitev posebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev poštene konkurence, kjer so individualne pravice prenesene;
(c) harmonise the specific measures to ensure fair competition where individual rights are transferred.
(d) določitev izjeme od načela nevtralnosti storitev ali tehnološke nevtralnosti, pa tudi za uskladitev obsega in narave katere koli izjeme od teh načel v skladu s členom 9(3) in (4), razen tistih, ki so namenjene zagotavljanju spodbujanja kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter medijskega pluralizma.
(d) create an exception to the principle of services or technology neutrality, as well as to harmonise the scope and nature of any exceptions to these principles in accordance with Article 9(3) and (4) other than those aimed at ensuring the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism .
Ti izvedbeni ukrepi ne posegajo v ukrepe, sprejete na ravni Skupnosti ali nacionalni ravni v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti za izpolnitev ciljev, ki so v splošnem interesu, zlasti v zvezi spodbujanjem kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti in medijskega pluralizma.
These implementing measures are without prejudice to measures taken at Community or national level, in compliance with Community law, to pursue general interest objectives, and in particular those relating to the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism.
Komisiji lahko v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe […/ES] pri izvajanju določb tega odstavka pomaga organ .
In the implementation of the provisions of this paragraph, the Commission may be assisted by the Authority in accordance with Article 10 Regulation […/EC] .