natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V vsakoletnem poročilu Komisije o razvoju podeželja je posebno poglavje namenjeno spremljanju ukrepov, povezanih s prednostnimi nalogami iz člena 16a(g).
The Commission's annual report on rural development shall contain a section specifically dealing with monitoring operations connected with the priorities listed in Article 16a(1)(g).
Člen 69 – odstavek 5 b
Article 69 – paragraph 5 b
Če je ob zaključku programa dejanski znesek prispevka Skupnosti, porabljen za dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1), nižji od vsote zneskov iz odstavka 5a tega člena, država članica v splošni proračun Skupnosti povrne razliko do zneska, za katerega so bila presežena skupna dodeljena sredstva na voljo za dejavnosti, razen za dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1).
If, at the closure of the programme, the actual amount of Community contribution spent on the operations referred to in Article 16a(1) is lower than the total of the amounts referred to in paragraph 5a of this Article, the difference shall be reimbursed by the Member State to the general budget of the European Communities up to the amount by which the total allocations available for operations other than those referred to in Article 16a(1) have been exceeded.
Če je ob zaključku programa dejanski znesek prispevka Skupnosti, porabljen za dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1), nižji od vsote zneskov iz odstavka 5a tega člena, država članica vključi v svoj proračun za razvoj kmetijstva razliko do zneska, za katerega so bila presežena skupna dodeljena sredstva na voljo za dejavnosti, razen za dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1).
If, at the closure of the programme, the actual amount of Community contribution spent on the operations referred to in Article 16a(1) is lower than the total of the amounts referred to in paragraph 5a of this Article, the difference shall be incorporated by the Member State in its agricultural development budget up to the amount by which the total allocations available for operations other than those referred to in Article 16a(1) have been exceeded.
Če je poleg tega ob zaključku programa dejanski znesek prispevka Skupnosti, porabljen za dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1)(a) do (f), nižji od zneska iz odstavka 5a tega člena za navedene vrste dejavnosti, država članica v splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti povrne razliko do zneska, za katerega so bila presežena razpoložljiva dodeljena sredstva za dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1)(g).
In addition, if, at the closure of the programme, the actual amount of Community contribution spent on the operations referred to in Article 16a(1)(a) to (f) is lower than the amount referred to in paragraph 5a of this Article for those types of operations, the difference shall be reimbursed by the Member State to the general budget of the European Communities up to the amount by which the allocations available for operations referred to in Article 16a(1)(g) have been exceeded.
Toda če je dejanski znesek prispevka Skupnosti, porabljen za dejavnosti, ki niso tiste iz člena 16a(1), nižji od razpoložljivih dodeljenih sredstev za navedene vrste dejavnosti, se znesek, ki ga je treba povrniti, zmanjša za navedeno razliko.
However, if the actual amount of Community contribution spent on the operations other than those referred to in Article 16a(1) is lower than the allocations available for those types of operations, the amount to be reimbursed shall be reduced of that difference.
Vzporedno s tem, če je ob zaključku programa dejanski znesek prispevka Skupnosti, porabljen za dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1)(g), nižji od zneska iz odstavka 5a tega člena za navedene vrste dejavnosti, država članica v splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti povrne razliko do zneska, za katerega so bila presežena razpoložljiva dodeljena sredstva za dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1)(a) do (f).
In parallel, if at the closure of the programme, the actual amount of Community contribution spent on the operations referred to in Article 16a(1)(g) is lower than the amount referred to in paragraph 5a of this Article for those types of operations, the difference shall be reimbursed by the Member State to the general budget of the European Communities up to the amount by which the allocations available for operations referred to in Article 16a(1)(a) to (f) have been exceeded.
Člen 1 – točka 6 – podtočka ba (novo)
Article 1 – point 6 – subpoint ba (new)
Člen 69 – odstavek 6a (novo)
Article 69 – paragraph 6a (new)
Od zneska iz odstavka 2a se v proračunskem letu 2009 dodeli 250 milijonov EUR za plačila.“
From the amount referred to in paragraph 2a, EUR 250 million shall be made available for payments in budget year 2009.".
Člen 2 – točka 6a (novo)
Article 2 – point 6a (new)
Člen 69a (novo)
Article 69a (new)
(6a) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(6a) The following Article is inserted:
„Člen 69a
" Article 69a
Jamstveni in posojilni skladi
Guarantee and loan funds
Ne glede na določbe člena 69 lahko države članice uporabijo zneske iz člena 69(2a) za jamstveni in posojilni sklad.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 69, Member States can use the amount referred to in Article 69(2a) for guarantee and loan funds.
Za izvajanje tega člena se uporabljajo določbe iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1974/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o podrobnih pravilih glede uporabe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) 1 , zlasti členov 50, 51 in 52.
For the implementation of this Article, the provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) 1 , and in particular Articles 50, 51 and 52 thereof, shall apply.
1 UL L 368, 23.12.2006, str.
1 OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p.
Državam članicam je treba ponuditi možnost, da sredstva uporabijo za posojila in kreditna jamstva, ki bodo podeželskim interesnim skupinam mogočila vlaganje.
It is necessary to give Member States the option to use the funds for loans and credit guarantees, which would enable rural stakeholders to launch investments.
Člen 70 – odstavek 4 – pododstavek 2
Article 70 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
„Ne glede na zgornje meje, določene v odstavku 3, se lahko prispevek EKSRP poveča do 90 % za konvergenčne in do 75 % za nekonvergenčne regije za vrste dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1) te uredbe, do zneska, ki je posledica uporabe obvezne modulacije iz členov 9(4) in 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št…, zneska iz člena 69(2a) te uredbe in od leta 2011 dalje zneskov, nastalih na podlagi člena 136 Uredbe (ES) št. ...“
"Notwithstanding the ceilings set out in paragraph 3, the EAFRD contribution may be increased to 90 % for convergence and to 75% for non-convergence regions for the operations of the types referred to in Article 16a(1) of this Regulation, up to the amount resulting from the application of the compulsory modulation under Article 9(4) and Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No …, the amount referred to in Article 69(2a) of this Regulation and, as from 2011, the amounts generated under Article 136 of Regulation (EC) No ….";
„Ne glede na zgornje meje, določene v odstavku 3, se lahko prispevek EKSRP poveča do 100 % za konvergenčne in do 75 % za nekonvergenčne regije za vrste dejavnosti iz člena 16a(1) te uredbe, do zneska, ki je posledica uporabe obvezne modulacije iz členov 9(4) in 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št…, zneska iz člena 69(2a) te uredbe in od leta 2011 dalje zneskov, nastalih na podlagi člena 136 Uredbe (ES) št. ...“
"Notwithstanding the ceilings set out in paragraph 3, the EAFRD contribution may be increased to 100 % for convergence and to 75% for non-convergence regions for the operations of the types referred to in Article 16a(1) of this Regulation, up to the amount resulting from the application of the compulsory modulation under Article 9(4) and Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No …, the amount referred to in Article 69(2a) of this Regulation and, as from 2011, the amounts generated under Article 136 of Regulation (EC) No ….";
Glede na načelo teritorialne kohezije in določbe člena 69(4)(c) uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 je za ukrepe iz člena 16a(1) te uredbe primeren tudi 100-odstotni prispevek EKSRP, da se kar največ prispeva k posodobitvi posameznih kmetijskih območij.
In view of the principle of territorial cohesion and the provisions of Article 69(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, an EAFRD contribution of up to 100% is considered appropriate for the measures referred to under Article 16a(1) of this regulation, so as to ensure a maximum contribution to the modernisation of the agricultural areas concerned.
Člen 1 – točka 8a (novo)
Article 1 – point 8a (new)
Člen 76 – odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 76 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(8a) V členu 76 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(8a) In Article 76, the following paragraph is added:
Priloga III – naslov
Annex III – Title
Seznam vrst dejavnosti, povezanih s prednostnimi nalogami iz člena 16a(1)(g)
List with types of operations related to the priority under Article 16a(1)(g)
Okviren seznam vrst dejavnosti, povezanih s prednostnimi nalogami iz člena 16a(1)(g)
Indicative list with types of operations related to the priority under Article 16a(1)(g)
Zdi se primerno, da se lahko države članice po potrebi prilagajajo in poleg dejavnosti iz priloge III podprejo tudi tiste iz člena 16a(1)(g).
It is considered appropriate to give the Member States the flexibility necessary to enable them to support operations under Article 16a(1)(g) in addition to those listed in Annex III.
Priloga III – stolpec 1 – vrstica 1
Annex III – column 1 – line 1
Vzpostavitev nove širokopasovne infrastrukture, vključno z zalednimi napravami (npr. fiksna, prizemna brezžična ali satelitska tehnologija ali kombinacija različnih tehnologij)
Creation of new broadband infrastructure including backhaul facilities (e.g. fixed, terrestrial wireless, satellite-based or combination of technologies)
Vzpostavitev nove širokopasovne infrastrukture, vključno z zalednimi napravami in opremo na tleh (npr. fiksna, prizemna brezžična ali satelitska tehnologija ali kombinacija različnih tehnologij) in drugimi potrebnimi oblikami podpore (npr. namestitev in vzdrževanje)
Creation of new broadband infrastructure including backhaul facilities and ground equipment (e.g. fixed, terrestrial wireless, satellite-based or combination of technologies) and other necessary forms of support (e.g. installation and maintenance)
Priloga III – vrstica 3 a (novo)
Annex III – line 3 a (new)
Zagotovitev javnega dostopa do širokopasovnih zmogljivosti
Providing public access to broadband facilities
Člen 56: osnovne storitve za gospodarstvo in podeželsko prebivalstvo
Article 56: basic services for the economy and rural population
Evropski svet je na seji 11. in 12. decembra 2008 potrdil evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva, ki predvideva uvedbo prednostnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi gospodarstvom držav članic omogočili hitrejše prilagajanje na sedanje izzive na podlagi prizadevanj, vrednih približno 1,5 % BDP Evropske unije (kar ustreza približno 200 milijardam EUR).
The European Council, at its meeting on 11 and 12 December 2008, approved a European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP), which envisages the initiation of priority action to enable the Member States' economies to adjust more rapidly to current challenges, based on an effort equivalent in total to around 1.5% of the European Union GDP (a figure amounting to around EUR 200 billion).
Od tega bi bilo treba dati 1,5 milijarde EUR na razpolago državam članicam prek Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) za razvoj širokopasovnega interneta na podeželskih območjih in za okrepitev novih dejavnosti za izzive, opredeljene pri pregledu srednjeročne prenove skupne kmetijske politike leta 2003.
Out of this amount, EUR 1.5 billion should be made available to all Member States via the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) with a view to developing broadband internet in rural areas and to strengthening the operations related to the new challenges as defined in the context of the assessment of the 2003 midterm reform of the CAP - the "Health Check".
Ta znesek bi bilo treba razdeliti, in sicer tretjino (0,5 milijarde EUR) porabiti za nove izzive, dve tretjini (1 milijarda EUR) pa za razvijanje širokopasovne internetne infrastrukture na podeželskih območjih.
The amount of EUR 1.5 billion should be split, with one third of it (EUR 0.5 billion) being spent on new challenges and two thirds (EUR 1 billion) being spent on developing broadband internet infrastructures in rural areas.
Prenosi med tema svežnjema niso dovoljeni.
Transfers between these two sub-packages are not allowed.
Predlog Komisije bi moral vzpostaviti pravni okvir, ki bi državam članicam omogočil uporabo teh zneskov.
The Commission proposal should establish the legal framework to allow Member States to use the above mentioned amounts.
Da bi dali ta dodatna sredstva na razpolago kot podporo Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja v okviru evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, bi morale države članice do 30. junija 2009 pregledati in dopolniti svoje programe za razvoj podeželja.
In order to make these additional resources available as Community support for rural development under the EERP, Member States should revise their rural development programmes by 30 June 2009.
Glede širokopasovnega interneta bi morale države članice v svojih nacionalnih programih predvideti dejavnosti za širokopasovno infrastrukturo.
With regard to broadband, Member States should provide in their national programmes for operations related to broadband infrastructure.
Da bi zagotovili obsežen razvoj širokopasovnega interneta na podeželskih območjih, Komisija predlaga, da bi morale biti dejavnosti za to infrastrukturo upravičene brez omejitev glede velikosti te infrastrukture, za razliko od omejitev za osnovne storitve za gospodarstvo in podeželsko prebivalstvo.
In order to ensure a substantive development of broadband internet in rural areas the Commission proposes that operations related to broadband infrastructure should be considered eligible without limitation in the size of the related infrastructure as opposed to the existing limitation in size for infrastructure in basic services for economy and rural population.
V prilogi III predloga Komisije je naveden izčrpen seznam vrst dejavnosti, povezanih s širokopasovno infrastrukturo, na primer postavitev nove tovrstne infrastrukture, nadgradnja obstoječe ter vzpostavitev tovrstne pasivne infrastrukture.
In Annex III of the proposal the Commission provides an exhaustive list of types of operations related to broadband infrastructure such as creation of new broadband infrastructure, upgrade of the existing broadband infrastructure, laying down passive broadband infrastructure.
Zaradi novih izzivov bi morale države članice v svojih programih za razvoj podeželja zagotoviti sredstva za dejavnosti, povezane s temi izzivi, do 30. junija 2009.
With regard to new challenges, Member States should provide in their rural development programmes for types of operations related to the new challenges by 30 June 2009.
Predlog Komisije izjemoma dopušča do desetodstotno povišanje stopenj sofinanciranja za proračunsko leto 2009.
The Commission proposal exceptionally allows for increase by 10% of the co -financing rates for the budget year 2009.
Vendar bi države članice morale spoštovati zgornje meje sofinanciranja za celo programsko obdobje, kar pomeni, da bodo morale povečati svoj del sofinanciranja v preostalih letih programskega obdobja.
Member States should however respect the co-financing ceilings over the whole programming period, meaning that they will have to increase their part of co-financing in the remaining years of the programming period.
Komisija predlaga višje stopnje sofinanciranja za ukrepe, povezane z novimi izzivi in širokopasovno infrastrukturo.
The Commission proposes higher co-financing rates for measures linked to the new challenges and broadband infrastructure.
Po njenem predlogu bi moral EKSRP zagotoviti 90 odstotkov sofinanciranja za konvergenčne regije in 75 odstotkov za nekonvergenčne.
According to the Commission proposal the EAFRD should ensure 90% of the co-financing for convergence regions and 75% for non-convergence regions.
Tako bi lahko v letu 2009 sofinanciranje za konvergenčne regije naneslo do 100 odstotkov.
Thus, for the year 2009 the co-financing for convergence regions can go up to 100%.
Poročevalka pozdravlja predlog Komisije in meni, da bi morala omogočiti hitro odzivanje na sedanjo gospodarsko krizo.
The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal and believes that it should allow for a rapid response to the current economic crisis.
Glavna vprašanja poročevalke:
Main issues raised by the Rapporteur:
Za dejavnosti, povezane z novimi izzivi, bi moralo biti na voljo 250 milijonov EUR
EUR 250 million to be made available for activities linked to the new challenges
Evropski parlament in Svet sta s spremembo k proračunu 2009 povečala proračunsko vrstico za razvoj podeželja za 250 milijonov EUR in jih dodelila za dejavnosti, povezane s podnebnimi spremembami (gl. predlog spremembe 0371 o vrstici 05 04 05 01, ki ga je Evropski parlament sprejel 18. decembra 2008).
By an amendment to the Budget 2009 the European Parliament and the Council increased the 2009 budget line for rural development by 250 million, ring fencing these funds for rural development in the context of climate change (see AM 0371 on line 05 04 05 01 as adopted by the European Parliament on 18 December 2008).
Komisija ni želela upravljati teh sredstev z utemeljitvijo, da ne bi bilo ustrezno spremeniti vseh programov za razvoj podeželja.
The Commission has refused to manage these additional funds, arguing that it would be inappropriate to modify all the rural development programmes.
Poročevalka meni, da je sedanji predlog Komisije priložnost, da bi ta sredstva, ki so že na voljo v proračunu za leto 2009, postala izvršljiva.
The Rapporteur believes that the current Commission proposal is an opportunity to make these funds, which are already available in the Budget 2009, executable.
Ker se sredstva ravno prerazporejajo, poročevalka predlaga, naj se dajo na voljo za dejavnosti, povezane s prednostnimi nalogami, opredeljenimi pri pregledu skupne kmetijske politike.
In the context of the current reprogramming, the Rapporteur proposes that these funds should be made available for activities related to the priorities as defined in the "Health Check" of the CAP.
Plačila v proračunskem letu 2009
Payments in budget year 2009
Poročevalka meni, da je treba za hiter odziv na gospodarsko krizo predvideti plačila, ki se lahko izvedejo v proračunu za leto 2009.
The Rapporteur believes that the need for rapid reaction to the current economic crisis requires foreseeing payments which can be executed already in budget year 2009.
Posojilni in jamstveni skladi
Loan and credit guarantee funds
Pomembna tema med sedanjo gospodarsko krizo je manjša splošna razpoložljivost posojil in zaostrovanje pogojev za pridobitev bančnega kredita.
A major issue in the current economic crisis is the reduction in the general availability of loans and the tightening of the conditions required to obtain credit from the banks.
Zato poročevalka predlaga, naj se državam članicam ponudi možnost, da uporabijo sredstva za posojilna in kreditna jamstva, ki bodo podeželskim interesnim skupinam v teh težkih časih omogočila vlaganje.
The Rapporteur therefore proposes that the Member States should have the option to use the funds made available for loans and credit guarantees, which would enable rural stakeholders to launch investments in difficult times.
Zagotovitev javnega dostopa do širokopasovnih zmogljivosti
Providing public access to broadband internet facilities
Zaradi razpršenosti prebivalstva in visokih stroškov v nekaterih podeželskih skupnostih vsi državljani ne bodo mogli imeti zasebnega dostopa do širokopasovne infrastrukture.
Due to dispread populations and high costs in some rural communities, not all citizens would be able to have private access to broadband infrastructure.
Zato poročevalka zagovarja, da bi imele države članice poleg predlaganih infrastrukturnih dejavnosti tudi možnost podpreti javne internetne zmogljivosti v podeželskih skupnostih, na primer v javnih knjižnicah ali krajevnih uradih.
The Rapporteur advocates therefore that in addition to the proposed infrastructure operations, Member States should have the option to support public internet facilities in rural communities such as in public libraries or town halls.
Javna podpora pa se ne bi smela uporabljati za izobraževanje in programsko opremo.
Public support however should not be used for training and software.
Informacije za lokalne organe in morebitne uporabnike ukrepov
Information to local authorities and potential beneficiaries of the measures
Predlog Komisije bo sprožil nekaj večjih sprememb v programih držav članic za razvoj podeželja, zlasti glede vrst dejavnosti, povezanih z izzivi, opredeljenimi pri pregledu, in širokopasovno infrastrukturo.
The current Commission proposal will bring some substantial modifications to the rural development programmes of the Member States and in particular with regard to the types of operations related to the new "Health check" challenges and broadband infrastructure.
Poročevalka predlaga, da bi posebne informacije posredovali širši javnosti in lokalnim organom, pristojnim za izvajanje teh novih ukrepov.
The Rapporteur proposes therefore that specific information should be provided to the general public and to local authorities responsible for implementing theses new measures.
Upoštevanje razlik med državami članicami glede obstoječe širokopasovne pokritosti
Taking into account the differences in existing broadband coverage in the Member States
Da bi zagotovili čim učinkovitejšo uporabo razpoložljivih sredstev in omogočili znaten razvoj širokopasovnega interneta na podeželskih območjih, bi morala po mnenju poročevalke Komisija upoštevati razlike med državami članicami glede obstoječe širokopasovne pokritosti in jih uporabiti kot kazalnik za različno dodelitev teh sredstev.
In order to ensure the most effective use of the available resources and to allow a substantive development of the broadband internet in rural areas the Rapporteur believes that the Commission shall refer to the differences in existing broadband coverage in the Member States as indicator for differential allocation of these funds.
Pregledani predlog je del evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, ki se je začel izvajati novembra 2008 in ga je Evropski svet dne 11. in 12. decembra istega leta podprl s skupaj 200 milijardami EUR; večina tega zneska (170 milijard EUR) se bo sprostila na ravni držav članic (čeprav ga bo uskladila EU).
The proposal is part of the European Economic Recovery Plan launched in November 2008 and endorsed by the European Council on 11-12 December 2008, with a total amount of EUR 200 billion, most of it (EUR 170 billion) at Member State level (coordinated, however, by the EU).
Iz proračunov EU in EIB bo sproščenih približno 30 milijard EUR; od tega je bilo 5 milijard EUR „novih naložb“ predlaganih za ukrepe v energetskem sektorju (3,5 milijarde EUR – poročilo odbora ITRE) in za EKSRP (1,5 milijarde – poročilo odbora AGRI).
About EUR 30 billion will be mobilised by the EU and EIB budgets, out of which EUR 5 billion of 'new investment' have been suggested for an Energy package (EUR 3.5 billion - report in ITRE Committee) and for the EAFRD (EUR 1.5 billion - report in AGRI Committee).
Po predlogu Komisije bi od dodatne 1,5 milijarde EUR namenili 1 milijardo EUR za širokopasovno infrastrukturo, 500 milijonov EUR pa za podnebne spremembe, obnovljive vrste energije, biotsko raznovrstnost in prestrukturiranje sektorja mleka s spremembo pogojev za pridobitev sredstev iz Uredbe 1698/2005
The Commission proposes that, of the additional EUR 1.5 billion, EUR 1 billion should be devoted to broadband infrastructure and EUR 500 million to action on climate change, renewable energies, biodiversity and dairy sector restructuring, changing the eligibility criteria for funding under Regulation No 1698/2005.