natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V povezavi s predhodnim predlogom spremembe člena 15(1).
This links with a previous amendment to Article15, paragraph 1.
Komisija zagotovi izmenjavo informacij in sodelovanje med državami članicami ter drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi na področju najboljših praks okoljskega ravnanja za ustrezne sektorje, da bi se pripravili sektorski referenčni dokumenti, ki vključujejo najboljše prakse okoljskega ravnanja ter kazalnike okoljske uspešnosti za posamezne sektorje.
The Commission shall ensure information exchange and collaboration between Member States and other stakeholders on the best environmental management practice for relevant sectors, in order to develop sectoral reference documents, including best environmental management practice and environmental performance indicators for specific sectors.
Komisija zagotovi izmenjavo informacij in sodelovanje med državami članicami ter drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi na področju najboljših praks okoljskega ravnanja za ustrezne sektorje, da bi se pripravili sektorski in podsektorski referenčni dokumenti, ki lahko vključujejo najboljše prakse okoljskega ravnanja, zahteve za najnižjo raven okoljske uspešnosti, ki so precej nižje od zakonsko predvidene najnižje ravni, kazalnike okoljske uspešnosti za posamezne sektorje ter merila odličnosti in sisteme za ocenjevanje ravni uspešnosti .
The Commission shall ensure information exchange and collaboration between Member States and other stakeholders on the best environmental management practice for relevant sectors, in order to develop sectoral or sub-sectoral reference documents, which may include best environmental management practice, environmental minimum performance requirements going significantly beyond the legal minimum, environmental performance indicators for specific sectors, and benchmarks of excellence and rating systems identifying performance levels.
Komisija po posvetovanju z vsemi sodelujočimi stranmi v zadevnih sektorjih ali podsektorjih, kot so industrija, sindikati, trgovina, trgovci na drobno, uvozniki, skupine za varstvo okolja in potrošniške organizacije, najpozneje do 1. januarja 2010 oblikuje delovni načrt, ki bo na voljo javnosti.
After having consulted all involved stakeholders in the sector or subsector in question such as industry, trade unions, traders, retailers, importers, environmental protection groups and consumer organisations, the Commission shall , not later than 1 January 2010 , establish a working plan which shall be made publicly available.
Delovni načrt za naslednja tri leta določa okvirni seznam sektorjev in podsektorjev, ki bodo veljali za prednostne pri sprejemanju sektorskih referenčnih dokumentov, nato pa se bo dopolnil z vsemi sektorji.
The working plan shall set out , for the following three years , an indicative list of sectors and subsectors which will be considered priorities for the adoption of sectoral reference documents to start with and to be completed for all sectors.
Komisija redno dopolnjuje delovni načrt po posvetovanju z vsemi ustreznimi interesnimi skupinami.
The working plan shall be amended periodically by the Commission after consultation with all relevant stakeholders.
Sektorski referenčni dokumenti bi morali organizacijam pomagati pri izboljšanju njihove okoljske uspešnosti, prav tako bi bilo uporabno vključiti primerjalna merila in sisteme za ocenjevanje.
The sectoral reference documents should help organisations to improve their environmental performance and the inclusion of benchmarks and rating systems could be useful.
Komisija opravi revizijo sistema EMAS v skladu z izkušnjami, ki jih je pridobila med njegovim delovanjem, in mednarodnimi razmerami.
The Commission shall review EMAS in the light of the experience gained during its operation and international developments.
Pri tem upošteva poročila, ki jih je v skladu s členom 47 predložila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
It shall take into account the reports transmitted to the European Parliament and to the Council in accordance with Article 47.
Komisija opravi revizijo sistema EMAS pred potekom petih let od začetka njegove veljave v skladu z izkušnjami, ki jih je pridobila med njegovim delovanjem, in mednarodnimi razmerami.
The Commission shall review EMAS , no later than five years after entry into force, in the light of the experience gained during its operation and international developments.
Revizija predvsem oceni vpliv sistema na okolje in trend glede na število udeležencev v njem, da bi se lahko o nadaljevanju sistema sprejela odločitev.
The revision shall assess in particular the impact of the scheme on the environment and the trend in terms of number of participants with a view to a decision being taken on the continuation of the scheme.
Priloga I – odstavek 2 – točka (a) – pododstavek 2
Annex I – paragraph 2 – point (a) – subparagraph 2
Vse organizacije morajo upoštevati neposredne vidike svojega delovanja.
All organisations have to consider the direct aspects of their operations.
Vse organizacije morajo upoštevati neposredne vidike svojega delovanja s posebnim poudarkom na glavnih kazalnikih iz Priloge IV .
All organisations have to consider the direct aspects of their operations , with particular reference to the core indicators set out in A nnex IV.
Povezava med okoljskim pregledom in poročanjem glavnih kazalnikov mora biti jasna.
There should be a clear link between the Environmental Review, and the reporting of the core indicators.
Organizacije bi morale opredeliti svoje glavne kazalnike v okoljskem pregledu in nato o njih poročati v okoljski izjavi.
Organisations should identify their core indicators in the environmental review, and then report on them in their environmental statement.
Priloga II – točka A.3 Planiranje – desni stolpec Del B (novo)
Annex II– point A.3 Planning – right-hand column Part B (new)
dodatna vprašanja, ki jih morajo obravnavati organizacije, ki uporabljajo sistem EMAS
additional issues to be addressed by organisations implementing EMAS
Organizacije, ki izvajajo sistem EMAS morajo upoštevati dodatne zahteve za okoljsko poročilo iz Priloge I, ki nadgrajujejo zahteve za načrtovanje v standardu ISO.
Organisations implementing EMAS should follow the additional requirements for an Environmental Review set out in A nnex I which builds on ISO "Planning" requirements.
Organizacije, ki izvajajo sistem EMAS morajo upoštevati dodatne zahteve za notranjo okoljsko presojo iz Priloge III in za okoljsko izjavo iz Priloge IV, ki nadgrajujejo zahteve za preverjanje v standardu ISO.
Organisations implementing EMAS should meet the additional requirements for the i nternal e nvironmental a udit set out in A nnex III and for the e nvironmental s tatement set out in A nnex IV, which build on ISO "Checking" requirements.
Predlog spremembe pojasnjuje povezavo med Prilogo II ter prilogama III in IV.
The amendment clarifies the link between Annex II and Annexes III and IV.
Organizacije, ki se registrirajo v sistem EMAS morajo upoštevati zahteve, ki presegajo zahteve standarda ISO in so naštete v Prilogah III in IV.
Organisations applying for EMAS registration must implement additional requirements to those needed for ISO certification and these are listed in Annex III and IV.
Priloga IV – točka C
Annex IV– point C
C. poročilo o okoljski uspešnosti
C. Environmental performance report
Poročilo o okoljski uspešnosti vključuje vsaj elemente in izpolnjuje minimalne zahteve, ki so navedeni spodaj:
The environmental performance report shall contain at least the elements and shall meet the minimum requirements as set out below:
(a) povzetek dostopnih podatkov o uspešnosti organizacije pri doseganju splošnih in posamičnih okoljskih ciljev glede na njene pomembne vplive na okolje.
(a) a summary of the data available on the performance of the organisation against its environmental objectives and targets with respect to its significant environmental impacts.
Poročanje temelji na glavnih kazalnikih in drugih ustreznih obstoječih okoljskih kazalnikih uspešnosti, kot je določeno v oddelku D;
Reporting shall be on the core indicators and on other relevant existing environmental performance indicators as set out under section D.
(b) druge dejavnike v zvezi z okoljsko uspešnostjo, vključno z izvajanjem zakonskih določb glede njihovih pomembnih vplivov na okolje;
(b) other factors regarding environmental performance including performance against legal provisions with respect to their significant environmental impacts;
(c) opis veljavnih zakonskih zahtev z zvezi z okoljem in dokaz o izpolnjevanju teh zahtev;
(c) a description of the applicable legal requirements relating to the environment and evidence of compliance with these requirements;
(d) ime in akreditacijska številka okoljskega preveritelja in datum potrditve.
(d) the name and accreditation number of the environmental verifier and the date of validation.
*Sklicevanja na poročila o okoljski uspešnosti je treba črtati v vsej uredbi.
*references to Environmental Performance Reports should be deleted throughout the R egulation.
Komisija je predlagala nov dvojni sistem poročanja: organizacija mora vsaka 3 leta posodobiti okoljsko izjavo, vsako leto pa pripraviti poročilo o okoljski uspešnosti.
The Commission has proposed a new double reporting mechanism: every 3 years the organisation shall update their environmental statement, and every year the organisation shall produce an environmental performance report.
Ker so zahteve za oba dokumenta enake, bi bilo učinkoviteje ostati pri sedanjem sistemu letnega poročanja, ko mora organizacija posodobiti okoljsko izjavo.
Given the requirements of both documents appears the same, it appears more efficient to stick with the current annual single reporting mechanism, whereby an organisation must update their environmental statement.
Priloga IV – točka D – odstavek 2 (a)
Annex IV– point D – paragraph 2 (a)
(a) Glavne kazalnike se uporablja za vse vrste organizacij.
(a) Core indicators shall apply to all types of organisations.
Osredotočajo se na uspešnost na naslednjih glavnih okoljskih področjih:
They focus on performance in the following key environmental areas:
energijska učinkovitost;
Energy efficiency;
učinkovitost materialov;
Material efficiency;
in emisije.
and Emissions
Če organizacija meni, da eden ali več glavnih kazalnikov ni pomembnih za njene neposredne okoljske vidike, to utemelji.
If an organisation feels that one or more of the core indicators are not relevant to their direct environmental aspects, they shall provide justification to that effect.
Glavni kazalniki so pomemben nov del uredbe in lahko okrepijo sistem.
The core indicators are an important new element to the regulation and have the potential to strengthen the scheme.
Vendar je treba omogočiti prilagodljivost pri uporabi kazalnikov, da bi se zagotovil njihov pomen.
However, flexibility should be given on which indicators should be used to ensure they are relevant.
Sistem okoljskega upravljanja in presoje (EMAS) je prostovoljni sistem EU, ki organizacijam pomaga pri prepoznavanju, spremljanju in poročanju o njihovih vplivih na okolje.
The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) is a voluntary EU scheme that helps an organisation identify, monitor, measure and report on their environmental impacts.
Vzpostavljen je bil leta 1995, razširjen pa leta 2001, ko je zajel organizacije javnega in zasebnega sektorja.
First introduced in 1995, it was extended in 2001 to both public and private sector organisations.
Da bi se dosegle dolgoročne izboljšave in okoljska uspešnost je treba zanj neodvisno preveriti podatke, preglednost in komunikacijo z udeleženci.
It requires independent verification of data and transparency and communication with stakeholders with a view to long term improvements in environmental performance .
V desetih letih, odkar sistem EMAS obstaja, je bilo vzpostavljenih veliko drugih prostovoljnih orodij in standardov na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni.
In the ten years that EMAS has been in existence, many alternative voluntary tools and standards have been established at the national and international level.
Nekateri med temi sistemi so privabili več udeležencev kot sistem EMAS.
Some of these new systems are attracting more participants than EMAS.
Mednarodni standard ISO 14001 je na primer postal vodilni sistem okoljskega ravnanja in je bolj priljubljen od sistema EMAS, ker velja, da je manj zahteven.
The International ISO 14001 has, for example, become the leading Environmental Management System (EMS) and is preferred to EMAS because it is seen as less onerous.
Standard ISO 14001 ima približno 130.000 udeležencev po vsem svetu in 35.000 v EU.
ISO 14001 has around 130,000 participants world wide and 35,000 in the EU.
V sistemu EMAS je trenutno registriranih 4200 organizacij iz EU, in to število ni občutno naraslo od leta 2004, ko je bilo udeležencev 3100.
EMAS currently has around 4,200 registered organisations in the EU, which has not increased substantially from the 2004 figure of around 3,100 registrants.
Za Nemčijo, državo, ki se v sistemu EMAS najbolje odreže, je število organizacij padlo z 1672 v letu 2004 na 1415 v letu 2008.
For the best-performing EMAS Member State, Germany, there is a downward trend from 1,672 organisations in 2004 to 1,415 in 2008.
Vendar v nekaterih drugih državah članicah število udeležencev raste, na primer v Španiji s 411 v letu 2004 na 1027 v letu 2008.
However, there are some increases in EMAS registrations in other Member States such as in Spain where the number of organisations has leaped from 411 in 2004, to 1,027 in 2008.
Komisija zagovarja stališče, da so pogoji za registracijo v EMAS strožji, a so okoljski učinki boljši kot v drugih sistemih okoljskega ravnanja.
The Commission argues that while the requirements for EMAS registration are tougher, the environmental outcomes are better than for other EMS.
Težava je v tem, da so sistemi okoljskega ravnanja precej novi in njihove raziskave ne ponujajo dovolj trdnih zaključkov, kot dokazujejo tudi študije Komisije o sistemu EMAS.
The problem is that because EMS are relatively “young” schemes, research on outcomes is inconclusive as the Commission own studies on EMAS indicate.
Komisija ob pregledu sistema EMAS izkorišča priložnost, da predlaga spremembe, ki bi poenostavile sistem in v 10 letih povečale število udeležencev na 30.000, kar bi ga izenačilo z udeležbo EU v standardu ISO 14001.
The Commission is using the opportunity of the revision of EMAS to propose some changes aimed at simplifying the system and increasing the number of participants to 35,000 within 10 years which is the same level of EU participation as in ISO 14001.
Spremembe zajemajo:
Changes include:
· „skupno registracijo“ za organizacije s sedeži v več državah članicah,
· “corporate registration” for organisations with sites in several Member States.
· „registracijo skupin organizacij“ za organizacije, ki želijo sodelovati pri pridobivanju registracije,
· “cluster registration” for organisations wishing to work together to achieve registration
· zmanjšane pristojbine in manj pogosto poročanje za mala in srednja podjetja,
· Reduced fees and less frequent reporting for SMEs
· zahtevo za države članice, naj pospešijo svoje promocijske dejavnosti in podpirajo uvajanje podpore, da bi se spodbudila udeležba v sistemu,
· A requirement for Member States to step-up their promotional activities and a push to introduce incentives to encourage participation.
· dodatno podporo Komisije prek uvajanja sektorskih referenčnih dokumentov.
· Additional Commission support through the introduction of sectoral reference documents
Poročevalka pozdravlja te spremembe.
The rapporteur welcomes these changes.
Vendar je nekaj področij, na katerih bi Komisija in države članice lahko naredile več, da bi privabile organizacije, naj se registrirajo v EMAS, ne da bi se oškodovala okoljska neoporečnost.
However, there are some areas where the Commission and Member States could do more to attract organisations to register EMAS without harming its environmental integrity:
· Organizacije bi lažje sledile zahtevam, če bi se zanje uporabljal poenostavljen jezik in bolje razčlenjen predlog.
· Simplified language and a better structured proposal would make the requirements easier to follow for organisations.
V enem od predlogov sprememb se Komisija poziva, naj objavi priročnik za uporabo sistema EMAS, ki bi bil še posebno koristen za majhne organizacije.
One amendment calls on the Commission to publish an EMAS User Manuel which should be particularly helpful for small organisations.
Drugi predlogi sprememb pojasnjujejo odnos med različnimi zahtevami iz prilog.
Other amendments clarify the relationship between the various requirements set out in the annexes.
· Uskladitev opredelitev iz sistema EMAS in standarda ISO 14001 bi organizacijam pomagala, da lažje preidejo iz ISO v EMAS.
· Aligning the definitions of EMAS with ISO 14001 would help organisations step up more easily from ISO to EMAS.
Zato so bili vloženi predlogi sprememb, razen za primere, ko obstaja jasen razlog za spremembo opredelitve.
Amendments are therefore tabled to this effect, except in cases where there is a clear reason for changing the definition.
· Komisija je predlagala nov triletni ciklus poročanja poleg že obstoječega enoletnega.
· The Commission has proposed a new 3-yearly reporting cycle, in addition to the current annual reporting cycle.
To je nepotrebno in bi lahko povzročilo zmedo.
This seems unnecessary and potentially confusing.
Več predlogov sprememb združuje oba ciklusa v en letni postopek ali, za mala in srednja podjetja, postopek na vsaki dve leti.
A number of amendments combine the two cycles into one annual procedure or every two years in the case of SMEs.
· Komisija s sistemom EMAS poskuša izboljšati skladnost z okoljsko zakonodajo EU.
· The Commission is seeking to improve compliance with EU environmental law through EMAS.
Zato predlaga, da bi organizacije lahko zahtevale izjavo o skladnosti od regulativnih organov.
It therefore proposes that organisations may request a statement of compliance from the regulatory authorities.
Nacionalni regulativni organi običajno ne bodo želeli pripraviti takšnih pozitivnih izjav o skladnosti, lahko pa izdajo izjavo, da nimajo nobenih podatkov o kakršni koli neskladnosti.
National regulators will not generally be willing to provide such a “positive statement” of compliance, but can issue a statement that they are not aware of any case of non-compliance.
V ta namen je bil vložen predlog spremembe.
An amendment is tabled along these lines.
· Uvajanje sektorskih referenčnih dokumentov je pomemben nov element uredbe in ga je treba okrepiti.
· The introduction of sectoral reference documents is an important new element of the regulation and should be strengthened.
Komisijo bi bilo treba spodbujati, naj sprejme celostne referenčne dokumente za toliko sektorjev in podsektorjev, kot je to mogoče.
The Commission should be encouraged to adopt comprehensive reference documents for as many sectors or sub-sectors as possible.
· Glavni kazalniki so dobrodošel dodatek in bi morali pomagati organizacijam pri poročanju o njihovi okoljski uspešnosti.
· The proposed core indicators are a welcome addition and should help organisations to report on their environmental performance.
Vendar vsi splošni kazalniki ne bodo pomembni za organizacijo, zato je treba omogočiti možnost odstopanj od seznama v primeru, da se predloži utemeljitev.
However, not all of the generic indicators will be relevant to the organisation and the possibility to deviate from the list should be allowed provided a justification is given.
Sektorski referenčni dokumenti bi morali nadomestiti splošne kazalnike s kazalniki, ki so značilni za posamezen sektor.
The sectoral reference documents should also replace the generic indicators with ones specific to that sector.
· Komisija je predlagala olajševalne okoliščine za uporabo logotipa sistema EMAS, vendar mora biti jasno, da se logotip ne sme uporabljati na embalaži in proizvodih, saj bi se ob tem pojavila nevarnost zamenjave z znakom za okolje (Eco-label).
· The Commission has proposed relaxing the restrictions on the use of the EMAS logo but it must be clear that the logo cannot be used on packaging and products as this runs the risk of confusion with the eco-label.
· Komisija in države članice bi lahko storile več za spodbujanje udeležbe v sistemu EMAS, na primer s podeljevanjem nagrad sistema EMAS ali s sklicevanjem nanj pri pogojih v pogodbah za delo in storitve.
· The Commission and Member States could do more to encourage participation in EMAS, for example through holding EMAS awards and through referring to EMAS as contract performance conditions for works and service contracts.
Zato je treba sistem EMAS poenostaviti, njegovo dodano vrednost pa je treba jasno predstaviti morebitnim udeležencem.
In order to do this, EMAS must be simplified and its added value made clearer to potential participants.
Komisija mora nadaljevati z objektivnim spremljanjem napredka sistema EMAS.
The Commission must continue to monitor progress with EMAS in an objective manner.
Če do naslednjega pregleda število udeleženih organizacij ne naraste, kot je načrtovano, bodo potrebni alternativni predlogi.
If by the time of the next review, the numbers of organisations taking part fails to increase as planned, alternative proposals will be needed.
o pogodbah o razvojnih ciljih tisočletja
on MDG contracts
- ob upoštevanju deklaracije tisočletja, ki so jo Združeni narodi sprejeli 18. septembra 2000, v kateri se je mednarodna skupnost obvezala, da bo dosegla razvojne cilje tisočletja ter do leta 2015 za polovico zmanjšala revščino v svetu, in ki je bila ponovno potrjena na več konferencah Združenih narodov, zlasti na konferenci o financiranju razvoja v Monterreyu,
– having regard to the United Nations Millennium Declaration of 18 September 2000, in which the international community pledged to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with a view to halving world poverty by 2015, as reaffirmed at several United Nations conferences including in particular the Monterrey Conference on Financing for Development,
- ob upoštevanju obveznosti, ki so jih države članice sprejele na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Barceloni 14. marca 2002,
– having regard to the commitments undertaken by the Member States at the Barcelona European Council of 15-16 March 2002,
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. junija 2007 o razvojnih ciljih tisočletja – vmesni pregled
- having regard to its resolution of 20 June 2007 on the Millennium Development Goals - the midway point
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0274 . ,
Texts adopted on that date, P6_TA(2007)0274 . ,
- ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic v okviru Sveta ter Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije o razvojni politiki Evropske unije z naslovom „Evropsko soglasje“
- having regard to the joint statement by the Council and the representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European Union development policy: ‘The European Consensus’,
1. , podpisane 20. decembra 2005,
1. signed on 20 December 2005,
- ob upoštevanju paketa razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, ki ga je pripravila Komisija leta 2005,
- having regard to the Commission’s ‘MDG package’ of 2005,
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Pospeševanje napredka v smeri doseganja razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja – financiranje razvoja in učinkovitost pomoči“ ( KOM(2005)0133 ),
- having regard to the communication from the Commission on ‘Accelerating progress towards attaining the Millennium Development Goals - Financing for Development and Aid Effectiveness’ ( COM(2005)0133 ),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Pomoč EU: nuditi več, hitreje in bolje ( KOM(2006)0087 ),
- having regard to the Commission communication on ‘EU aid: delivering more, better and faster’ ( COM(2006)0087 ),
- ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. septembra 2008 o ukrepih po konferenci iz Monterreya iz leta 2002 o financiranju razvoja
- having regard to its resolution of 23 September 2008 on the follow-up to the Monterrey Conference of 2002 on Financing for Development
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0420 . ,
Texts adopted on that date, P6_TA(2008)0420 . ,
212/L.1/Rev1 z dne 9. decembra 2008. ,
A/CONF.212/L.1/Rev.1 of 9 December 2008. ,