natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poleg tega morajo biti dolžnosti poročanja zlahka izvedljive, s čimer bi preprečili nepotrebno upravno obremenitev za podjetja in upravo držav članic ali Komisijo.
Furthermore, the reporting requirements should be easy to fulfill, so as to avoid any unnecessary administrative burden on undertakings, and the administration of Member States or of the Commission.
Tako je namen poročevalke zagotoviti, da lahko uredba uspešno deluje v praksi (saj veliko držav članic ni izpolnjevalo dolžnosti poročanja po stari uredbi) ter da je čim bolj uporabna, kar bi zagotovilo najboljši možni pregled pričakovanega razvoja energetske infrastrukture.
Therefore, the rapporteur will aim at ensuring that the regulation can work in practice (since many Member States did not comply with the reporting obligations under the old regulation) and it will be as useful as possible, providing the best possible overview of the expected developments in energy infrastructure.
Pomembno postopkovno vprašanje je tudi pravna podlaga te uredbe, ki bi moral biti novi člen 194, uveden z lizbonsko pogodbo, ki povečuje pristojnosti EU na področju energetske politike.
An important procedural point is that this Regulation should have as a legal basis the new article 194 introduced by the Lisbon treaty, which strengthens the EU competence in the field of energy policy.
S tem bi Evropski parlament dobil pristojnost soodločanja o zakonodaji (redni zakonodajni postopek po lizbonski pogodbi).
This would in term give the European Parliament co-decision powers on the legislation (the ordinary legislative procedure under the Lisbon Treaty).
Namen drugih pomembnih predlogov sprememb v osnutku poročila je:
The other main amendments in the draft report aim at:
- pojasniti vrsto načrtovanih investicijskih projektov, o katerih je treba obveščati, in na kateri stopnji pri izvajanju naložb je treba poročati, s čimer bi se izognili vprašanjem zaupnosti in posredovali natančno podobo predvidenega razvoja, saj bi poročali o projektih, ki bodo najverjetneje zaključeni;
- clarifying the type of planned investments projects that have to be reported and the stage in the development of the investment when the reporting must be done, in order to avoid confidentiality issues, to give an accurate picture of the expected developments, by covering projects for which there is a reasonably high level of probability to be completed.
- pojasniti opredelitve in vsebino obvestil;
- clarification of the definitions and the content of the notifications
- okrepiti določbe o zaupnosti podatkov, ki jih objavlja Evropska komisija;
- strengthening the provisions on the confidentiality of the data that would be published by the European Commission
- olajšati breme poročanja, tako da je Komisija v izvedbenem aktu dolžna pojasniti, kako se bo izvajala oprostitev dvojnega poročanja (kadar je poročanje o investicijskih projektih zahtevano že z drugimi direktivami), zlasti kaj, kdaj, komu in v kakšni obliki je treba poročati ter kdo mora to storiti;
- easing the reporting burden, by requiring the Commission to clarify in an implementing act how this exemption from double reporting (when reporting on investment projects is required under other directives) should be applied, in particular what must be reported, when, by whom, to whom and in what format.
- povečati uporabnost analiz, ki jih pripravi Komisija na podlagi prejetih informacij, da bi jih lahko uporabili kot orodje za zgodnje opozarjanje na infrastrukturne pomanjkljivosti, ki bi lahko ogrozile uspešno izvajanje skupne energetske politike EU;
- Improving the usefulness of the analysis that would be done by the Commission on the basis of the information received, so as to serve as an early-warning tool for infrastructure deficiency, which jeopardise a successful implementation of a common EU energy policy.
- vključiti zmogljivosti za črpanje/pridobivanje nafte in zemeljskega plina, čeprav jih je seveda malo in se v Evropski uniji zmanjšujejo;
- Include the capacities for extraction / production of oil and gas, although these are clearly in a small number and declining in the European Union
- vključiti dolžnosti poročanja o zmogljivostih za utekočinjen zemeljski plin, kar bo po mnenju poročevalke v prihodnje zelo pomembno za zagotavljanje raznovrstnosti oskrbe EU s plinom;
- Include reporting obligations on capacities related to liquified natural gas, which the rapporteur considers as very important in the future for ensuring the diversification of the EU’s gas supply
- znižati prag za poročanje o zmogljivostih za vetrno energijo na kopnem, saj lahko delokalizirana proizvodnja energije v manjših obratih postane pomemben del proizvodnje energije v Evropski uniji.
- Lower the threshold for reporting of on-shore wind power capacities, since delocalised energy production by smaller entities can become an important part of energy production in the EU.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi predloga uredbe Sveta o obveščanju Komisije o investicijskih projektih na področju energetske infrastrukture v Evropski skupnosti in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 736/96 (( KOM(2009)0361 – C7 0125/2009 – 2009/0106(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the Proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Community and repealing Regulation (EC) No 736/96 ( COM(2009)0361 – C7‑0125/2009 – 2009/0106(CNS) )
Spoštovani gospod Reul!
Dear Mr Reul,
V dopisu z 12. januarja 2010 ste Odbor za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 37(2) Poslovnika zaprosili za mnenje o pravni podlagi zgoraj omenjenega predloga Komisije.
By letter of 12 January 2010 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 37(2) to consider the legal basis of the above Commission proposal.
Ker je Komisija predlagala
Whereas the Commission has suggested
Sporočilo Komisije „Posledice začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja“ (KOM (2009) 665). , naj bosta pravna podlaga po uveljavitvi Lizbonske pogodbe člen 337 PDEU in člen 187 Pogodbe Euratom (ki natančno ustrezata prvotno predlagani pravni podlagi pred Lizbonsko pogodbo, in sicer členoma 284 PES in 187 Pogodbe Euratom), so poročevalec Odbora za industrijo in drugi poslanci vložili predloge sprememb za uporabo nove pravne podlage, to je člena 194(2) Lizbonske pogodbe namesto člena 337 PDEU.
In its communication, "Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures" (COM (2009) 665). that the post-Lisbon legal bases should be Article 337 TFEU together with Article 187 Euratom (which correspond exactly to the pre-Lisbon legal bases originally proposed: Article 284 EC and Article 187 Euratom), the Industry Committee's rapporteur and other members have tabled an amendment seeking to use the new legal basis afforded by the Lisbon Treaty of Article 194(2) TFEU in place of Article 337 TFEU.
Odbor je zadevo obravnaval na seji 28. januarja 2010.
The committee considered this question at its meeting of 28 January 2010.
Člen 337 PDEU in člen 187 Pogodbe Euratom sta enaka in določata naslednje:
Articles 337 TFEU and 187 Euratom are identical, providing as follows:
„Komisija lahko v mejah in pod pogoji, ki jih Svet z navadno večino določi v skladu z določbami Pogodb, zbira informacije in izvaja preverjanje, potrebno za opravljanje nalog, ki so ji bile zaupane.“
"The Commission may, within the limits and under conditions laid down by the Council acting by a simple majority in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties, collect any information and carry out any checks required for the performance of the tasks entrusted to it."
Oba člena
Those two articles
Takrat je bil člen 284 PES oštevilčen kot člen 213. sta bila uporabljena kot pravna podlaga za Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 736/96 z dne 22. aprila 1996 o obveščanju Komisije o investicijskih projektih, ki so v interesu Skupnosti na področju nafte, zemeljskega plina in električne energije
In fact, at that time Article 284 EC was numbered 213. were used as the legal basis for Council Regulation (EC) No 736/96 of 22 April 1996 on notifying the Commission of investment projects of interest to the Community in the petroleum, natural gas and electricity sectors
UL L 102, 25.4.1996, str.
OJ L 102, 25.4.1996, p.
S predlogom uredbe bi se razveljavila ta uredba, da bi učinkoviteje dosegli njene cilje.
The proposal for a regulation under consideration would repeal that regulation with a view to achieving its objectives more efficiently.
Komisija v obrazložitvenem memorandumu navaja, da se Uredba št. 736/96 „ne uveljavlja več dosledno in ni prilagojena najnovejšemu dogajanju v energetskem sektorju“ .
Indeed in its explanatory memorandum the Commission asserts that Regulation No 736/96 is "no longer enforced consistently and geared to the most recent evolutions of the energy sector" .
Vendar je videti, da bo predlog uredbe nadaljevanje Uredbe št. 736/96, saj je njegov cilj „revidirati in dodatno okrepiti sistem, določen“ v tem instrumentu.
It would appear, however, that the proposal for a regulation is viewed as a continuation of Regulation No 736/96 since it sets out to "revise and to further strengthen the system laid down" by that instrument.
Zdi se, da Komisija ravno zato predlaga ohranitev enake pravne podlage.
It would seem that it is for this reason that the Commission is proposing to maintain the same legal basis.
Poseben naslov o energiji (Naslov XXI), člen 194 že veljavne Lizbonske pogodbe, določa naslednje:
The Lisbon Treaty, now in force, has a specific title (Title XXI) on Energy, in which Article 194 provides as follows:
Člen 194
Article 194
Pri vzpostavitvi in delovanju notranjega trga in ob upoštevanju potrebe po ohranitvi in izboljšanju okolja so cilji energetske politike Unije v duhu solidarnosti med državami članicami:
In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market and with regard for the need to preserve and improve the environment, Union policy on energy shall aim, in a spirit of solidarity between Member States, to:
(a) zagotoviti delovanje energetskega trga;
(a) ensure the functioning of the energy market;
(b) zagotoviti zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo v Uniji;
(b) ensure security of energy supply in the Union ;
(c) spodbujati energetsko učinkovitost in varčevanje z energijo ter razvijanje novih in obnovljivih virov energije; in
(c) promote energy efficiency and energy saving and the development of new and renewable forms of energy; and
(d) spodbujati medsebojno povezovanje energetskih omrežij.
(d) promote the interconnection of energy networks.
Brez poseganja v uporabo drugih določb Pogodb Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku določita ukrepe, potrebne za doseganje ciljev iz odstavka 1.
Without prejudice to the application of other provisions of the Treaties, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish the measures necessary to achieve the objectives in paragraph 1.
Takšni ukrepi se sprejmejo po posvetovanju z Ekonomsko-socialnim odborom in z Odborom regij.
Such measures shall be adopted after consultation of the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
Ukrepi ne vplivajo na pravico držav članic, da določijo pogoje za izkoriščanje svojih energetskih virov, na izbiro med različnimi viri energije in na splošno strukturo njihove oskrbe z energijo, ne glede na člen 192(2)(c).
Such measures shall not affect a Member State's right to determine the conditions for exploiting its energy resources, its choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply, without prejudice to Article 192(2)(c).
Kadar so ukrepi iz odstavka 2 predvsem davčnega značaja, jih Svet z odstopanjem od navedenega odstavka določi po posebnem zakonodajnem postopku soglasno in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
By way of derogation from paragraph 2, the Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, shall unanimously and after consulting the European Parliament, establish the measures referred to therein when they are primarily of a fiscal nature.
Uporaba člena 194 za pravno podlago predlagane uredbe bi se lahko izkazala kot utemeljena, če bo instrument zadeval „obveščanj[e] Komisije o investicijskih projektih na področju energetske infrastrukture“ .
Recourse to Article 194 as the legal basis for the proposed regulation could prove justified in so far as the instrument concerns "the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure".
V skladu s točko XVI Priloge II Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta mandat Odbora za pravne zadeve vključuje tudi pristojnost za „razlago in uporabo evropskega prava, skladnost aktov Evropske unije s primarno zakonodajo, zlasti z izbiro pravne podlage ...“.
Point XVI of Annex VII to the Rules of Procedure provides that the terms of reference of the Committee for Legal Affairs include " the interpretation and application of European law, compliance of European Union acts with primary law, notably the choice of legal bases ...".
V skladu s svojim mandatom je odbor tako zavezan, da v primeru prošnje za mnenje o pravni podlagi določi ustrezno podlago ob upoštevanju Pogodb, ob tem pa njegova izbira ni omejena na pravne podlage, ki jih predlagata Komisija in pristojni odbor.
Accordingly, in order to act in accordance with its terms of reference when consulted on a question of legal basis, the committee is under a duty to determine the appropriate legal basis in the light of the Treaties without its choice being limited to the bases proposed by the Commission and the competent committee.
Na podlagi pregleda Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije bi za ta primer lahko veljale tudi določbe iz Naslova XVI o vseevropskih omrežjih.
In this case, it appears from perusal of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union that the provisions contained in Title XVI on trans-European networks could also be applicable.
Člen 170 določa, da „Unija [...] prispeva k vzpostavitvi in razvoju vseevropskih omrežij na področju prometne, telekomunikacijske in energetske infrastrukture“ .
Indeed, Article 170 provides that "the Union shall contribute to the establishment and development of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructures" .
Odbor mora tako določiti, na kateri izmed teh treh pravnih podlag bo sprejeta predlagana uredba.
Consequently, the committee has to determine on which of these three legal bases the proposed regulation ought to be adopted.
S predlogom uredbe so povezani vsi trije členi.
Each of the three articles in question has a link with the proposed regulation.
Člen 337
Article 337
Prej člen 284 PES. določa, da Komisija lahko zbira informacije (v tem primeru informacije o investicijskih projektih na področju energetske infrastrukture).
Formerly Article 284 EC. is concerned with the collection of information by the Commission (in this case, information about energy infrastructure investment projects).
Člen 194 se nanaša na energetsko politiko , člen 170 pa na infrastrukturo , zlasti na področju energetike.
Article 194 is concerned with energy policy and Article 170 with infrastructures , in particular in the field of energy.
Ne glede na nedavno sodbo Sodišča
In spite of a recent judgment of the Court of Justice
Sodba z dne 3. septembra 2009 v zadevi Parlament proti Svetu (C-166/07, še neobjavljena v ZOdl). , iz katere izhaja, da je možno kombinirati dve različni pravni podlagi, za kateri sta predvidena različna postopka, pa je treba upoštevati, da se dvojna pravna podlaga lahko uporabi le izjemoma, saj je glede na uveljavljeno mnenje Sodišča kombinacija različnih pravnih podlag izključena, če zanje predvideni postopki niso združljivi
Judgment of 3 September 2009 in Case C-166/07 Parliament v. Council , not yet reported in the ECR. in which it was held that it was possible to combine two legal bases involving different procedures, it should be considered that recourse to such dual legal bases should be exceptional, since the established view of the Court is that a combination of legal bases with incompatible procedures is not possible
Glej na primer zadevo Parlament proti Svetu ([1999] C-164/97, Recueil, str.
See, for instance, Case C-164/97 Parliament v. Council [1999] ECR I-1139, at para.
Prav tako je Sodišče v sodbi iz leta 2006
Accordingly, in a 2006 judgment
Zadeva Komisija proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ([2006] C-178/03, ZOdl., str.
Case C-178/03 Commission v. Parliament and Council [2006] ECR I-107, at para.
I-107, točka 57). menilo, „da je uporaba dvojne pravne podlage izključena, če so postopki, predvideni za eno ali drugo teh podlag, nezdružljivi in/ali če bi bile s kopičenjem pravnih podlag kršene pravice Parlamenta“.
57. , the Court considered that "recourse to a dual legal basis is not possible where the procedures laid down for each legal basis are incompatible with each other or where the use of two legal bases is liable to undermine the rights of the Parliament" .
V primeru člena 337 Svet odloča na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju s Parlamentom.
In the case of Article 337, the Council acts on a Commission proposal after consulting Parliament.
V nasprotju s tem pa člena 194 in 170 določata uporabo rednega zakonodajnega postopka, to je postopka soodločanja.
In contrast, both Articles 194 and 170 provide for recourse to the ordinary legislative procedure, that is to say, co-decision.
S pravnega vidika bi se lahko kombinirala člena 197 in 170, člen 337 pa ni združljiv z nobenim od njiju.
Consequently, legally, whilst Articles 194 and 170 could be used in combination, Article 337 could not be combined with either of those articles.
V skladu s sodno prakso izbira pravne podlage za ukrep „ne more biti odvisna samo od prepričanja institucije“
According to the case-law, the choice of legal basis for a measure "may not depend simply on an institution’s conviction"
Zadeva Komisija proti Svetu „Splošni carinski preferenciali“ ([1987] 45/86, Recueil, str.
Case 45/86 Commission v. Council ("Generalised Tariff Preferences") [1987] ECR 1493, at para.
1493, točka 11.) , ampak „mora temeljiti na objektivnih dejavnikih, ki so podvrženi sodnemu nadzoru [...]
11. but " must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review ....
Med takšne dejavnike spadata zlasti namen in vsebina ukrepa.“
Those factors include in particular the aim and content of the measure"
Zadeva Komisija proti Svetu „Titanov dioksid“ ([1991] C-300/89, Recueil, str.
Case C-300/89 Commission v. Council ("Titanium Dioxide") [1991] ECR I-2867, at para.
1. – Preučitev vsebine predlaganega ukrepa
1. - Consideration of the content of the proposed measure
V zvezi z vsebino se zdi popolnoma jasno, da je sporočanje informacij (glede investicijskih projektov na področju infrastrukture) ključni element predloga, tako z vidika naslovov členov kot njihove vsebine.
As far as the content is concerned, it appears absolutely clear that the notification of information (relating to infrastructure investment projects) is the key element of the proposal, in the light of both the titles of the articles and their content.
V skladu s tem je naslov člena 3 Obveščanje o podatkih , člena 4 Viri podatkov , člena 6 Kakovost in količina podatkov , člena 8 Obdelava podatkov in člena 9 Varstvo posameznikov pri obdelavi podatkov .
Accordingly, Article 3 is entitled, Notification of data , Article 4, Data sources , Article 6, Quality and publicity of data, Article 8, Data processing, and Article 9, Protection of individuals with regards to the processing of data .
Vsebina teh členov je osredotočena na zbiranje informacij v skladu s členom 337.
The content of those articles is focused on the collection of information as provided for in Article 337.
Člen 1 določa, da je cilj uredbe vzpostaviti „skupni okvir za obveščanje Komisije o podatkih in informacijah“.
Article 1 specifies that the object of the regulation is to establish "a common framework for the notification to the Commission of data and information" .
Člen 3 določa, da se podatki in informacije, določene v uredbi, zbirajo od začetka leta 2010, od takrat naprej pa vsaki dve leti.
Article 3 provides that the data and information specified in the regulation are to be compiled from the beginning of 2010 and from then onwards every two years.
Člen 4 jasno določa, da morajo zadevna podjetja sporočiti podatke državam članicam, razen če se te odločijo, da bodo uporabile druga sredstva za pridobitev podatkov.
Article 4 makes it clear that the Member State are to get the undertakings concerned to supply the data, unless they decide to use other means of obtaining them.
V členu 5 so naštete vrste podatkov, ki jih je treba posredovati v zvezi z investicijskimi projekti, na primer „verjetni datum začetka obratovanja“ .
Article 5 lists the type of data to be provided about investment projects, such as "the probable date of commissioning" .
Člen 6 določa, da morajo države članice zagotoviti kakovost, relevantnost, natančnost, jasnost, pravočasnost in usklajenost podatkov in informacij, ki se sporočijo Komisiji.
Article 6 requires Member States to ensure the quality, relevance, accuracy, clarity, timeliness and coherence of data and information they notify to the Commission.
Omenjeni sta tudi možnost, da Komisija lahko objavi podatke, in obveza držav članic, da „ohranijo zaupnost komercialno občutljivih podatkov ali informacij“ .
Mention is also made of the possibility for the Commission to publish the data and Member States' obligation to "preserve the confidentiality of commercially sensitive data or information" .
V skladu s členoma 7 in 8 je Komisija pooblaščena za sprejemanje izvedbenih ukrepov in odgovorna za razvijanje informacijske tehnologije, potrebne za sprejemanje, shranjevanje in obdelavo podatkov.
Articles 7 and 8 authorise the Commission to adopt implementing measures and make the Commission responsible for developing the IT resources needed to receive, store and carry out any processing of the data.
Člen 9 obravnava obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
Article 9 deals with the processing of personal data.
Vprašanje energije je obravnavano tudi v vsebinskem delu predlagane uredbe.
However, the question of energy is also to be found in the content of the proposed regulation.
Člen 3 določa izvzetje iz obveznosti poročanja o podatkih, kadar so ti že bili sporočeni „v skladu z zakonodajo energetskega sektorja ES“ .
Article 3 specifies that the obligation to report data does not apply where the data has already been notified "pursuant to EC energy sector-specific legislation" .
Poleg tega je iz člena 5 jasno razvidno, da predlagana uredba obravnava energetski sektor, saj se na primer nanaša na „uporabljeno vrsto energetskega vira“ , „tehnologije, pomembne za zagotavljanje varnosti dobave“ in „oprem[ o ] sistemov za zajemanje ogljika“ .
Moreover, it clearly emerges from Article 5 that the proposed regulation has to do with the energy sector: it refers, for instance, to "the type of energy sources used", "the technologies of interest for security of supply purposes" and "the equipment of carbon capture systems" .
Kot zadnje pa je v členu 10 (Spremljanje in poročanje) pojasnjen namen zbiranja teh informacij, in sicer, da Komisija na njihovi podlagi lahko zagotovi „medsektorsko analizo strukturnega razvoja in razvojnih možnosti energetskega sistema EU“ .
Lastly, Article 10, Monitoring and reporting, makes it clear what the collection of this information is all about: the idea is to enable the Commission to carry out "a cross-sector analysis of the structural evolution and perspectives of the EU energy system" .