natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V zadnjem primeru ima ministrstvo diskrecijsko pravico za izvajanje te pristojnosti, ki ni predmet zahteve pristojnega organa domače države članice.
In the latter circumstance, the Secretary of State enjoys some discretion in using this power, which is not subjected to a request from the competent authority of the home Member State .
Glede pristojnosti o zahtevi po predložitvi knjig ali dokumentov, ki je v skladu z direktivo, odstavek 13(2) določa, da ministrstvo ne izvaja teh pristojnosti glede na družbo ES, razen če je nadzorni organ v domači državi družbe pisno zahteval, da od družbe pridobi informacije.
With respect to the power to require a company to produce books or papers, in line with the Directive, paragraph 13(2) provides that the Secretary of State shall not exercise this power in respect of an EC company unless the supervisory authority in the company’s home State has requested him – in writing – to obtain information from that company.
Zato je izvedbeni ukrep Združenega kraljestva strožji od direktive, ker zahteva, da domača država članica obvesti pristojni organ tuje države članice in to uradno obvestilo predloži v pisni obliki.
Thus, the UK implementing measure is more restrictive than the Directive in that it requires the home Member State not only to notify the host Member State authority but also to submit this notification in writing.
Končno, odstavek 14(2) v skladu z direktivo določa, da lahko funkcionar ali agent ministrstva spremlja osebo, ki jo pooblastijo pristojni organi domače države članice, pri izvajanju njenih pristojnosti glede pridobivanja informacij.
Finally, in accordance with the Directive, paragraph 14(2) provides that an officer or agent of the Secretary of State may accompany the person authorised by the competent authorities of the home Member State while he is exercising the power to obtain information.
Dokazi, ki so bili analizirani do zdaj, kažejo, da nadzorniki Združenega kraljestva niso obiskali druge države članice glede družbe ELAS, bilo pa ni tudi nobenega predhodnega obveščanja tuje države članice o tej zadevi.
According to the evidence analyzed so far, no on-the-spot visits were performed by UK supervisors in other Member State regarding ELAS, nor have any previous notifications to the host Member State been found on this matter.
Člen 12 – Težave pri izpolnjevanju finančnih garancij (člen 24 prve direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju in člen 37 kodificirane direktive)
Article 12 - Difficulties to comply with financial guarantees (Articles 24 of 1LD and 37 of CD)
Ta člen navaja ukrepe, ki jih mora sprejeti pristojni organ domače države članice za zaščito pravic zavarovancev, ko imajo zavarovalnice težave pri izpolnjevanju finančnih garancij.
This article lists the actions to be taken by the competent authority of the home Member State to protect policyholders’ rights when assurance companies are facing difficulties in complying with their financial guarantees.
Določa okoliščine, v katerih se lahko sprejmejo takšni ukrepi, formalnosti, ki jih je treba upoštevati, in okoliščine, v katerih lahko domača država članica prepove prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe.
It specifies the circumstances under which such actions may be taken, the formalities that are to be observed and the circumstances under which the home Member State may prohibit the company's free disposal of assets.
Člen 24 Direktive 79/267/EGS se nadomesti z:
Article 24 of Directive 79/267/EEC shall be replaced by the following:
„Člen 24
'Article 24
Če zavarovalnica ne ravna v skladu s členom 17, lahko pristojni organ njene domače države članice prepove prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi, potem ko je svoj namen sporočil pristojnim organom držav članic obveznosti.
If an undertaking does not comply with Article 17, the competent authority of its home Member State may prohibit the free disposal of its assets after having communicated its intention to the competent authorities of the Member States of commitment.
Za namene ponovne vzpostavitve finančnega stanja zavarovalnice, katere minimalni kapital je padel pod minimum, ki ga zahteva člen 19, pristojni organ domače države članice zahteva, da mu v odobritev predloži načrt ponovne vzpostavitve dobrega finančnega stanja.
For the purposes of restoring the financial situation of an undertaking the solvency margin of which has fallen below the minimum required under Article 19, the competent authority of the home Member State shall require that a plan for the restoration of a sound financial position be submitted for its approval.
Če pristojni organ meni, da se bo finančno stanje zavarovalnice še naprej slabšalo, v izjemnih okoliščinah lahko tudi omeji ali prepove prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi zavarovalnice.
In exceptional circumstances, if the competent authority is of the opinion that the financial situation of the undertaking will further deteriorate, it may also restrict or prohibit the free disposal of the undertaking's assets.
Organe drugih držav članic, na katerih ozemljih zavarovalnica opravlja svojo dejavnost, obvesti o vseh sprejetih ukrepih, slednji pa na zahtevo prvega sprejmejo enake ukrepe.
It shall inform the authorities of other Member States within the territories of which the undertaking carries on business of any measures it has taken and the latter shall, at the request of the former, take the same measures.
Če minimalni kapital pade pod zajamčeni kapital, opredeljen v členu 20, pristojni organ domače države članice zahteva, da mu podjetje v odobritev predloži kratkoročni finančni načrt.
If the solvency margin falls below the guarantee fund as defined in Article 20, the competent authority of the home Member State shall require the undertaking to submit a short-term finance scheme for its approval.
Lahko tudi omeji ali prepove prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi zavarovalnice.
It may also restrict or prohibit the free disposal of the undertaking's assets.
Organe drugih držav članic, na katerih ozemljih zavarovalnica opravlja svojo dejavnost, obvesti o vseh ukrepih, slednji pa na zahtevo prvega sprejmejo enake ukrepe.
It shall inform the authorities of other Member States within the territories of which the undertaking carries on business accordingly and the latter shall, at the request of the former, take the same measures.
Pristojni organi lahko nadalje sprejmejo vse ukrepe, potrebne za varovanje interesov življenjskih zavarovancev, v primerih, opredeljenih v odstavkih 1, 2 in 3.
The competent authorities may further take all measures necessary to safeguard the interests of the assured persons in the cases provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3.
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni, da lahko v skladu z nacionalnim pravom v primerih, opredeljenih v odstavkih 1, 2 in 3, prepove prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi na njenem ozemlju na zahtevo domače države članice zavarovalnice, ki določi sredstva, ki jih bodo takšni ukrepi zajemali.“
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to be able in accordance with its national law to prohibit the free disposal of assets located within its territory at the request, in the cases provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, of the undertaking's home Member State, which shall designate the assets to be covered by such measures.'
Neučinkovito zagotavljanje zadostnih zavarovalno-tehničnih rezervacij: Zakon o zavarovalnicah iz leta 1982 daje ministrstvu pristojnost, da omeji prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe, če meni, da ni pokrila obveznosti z dovolj varnimi, donosnimi in tržnimi naložbami.
Failure to establish sufficient technical provisions: the ICA 1982 grants the Secretary of State the power to restrict a company’s freedom to dispose of its assets, if it appears to him that the company has failed to cover its liabilities by assets of appropriate safety, yield and marketability.
Domača zakonodaja v nasprotju z direktivo ne zahteva, da ministrstvo pristojne organe drugih držav članic obvesti o odločitvi, da bo omejilo prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe.
Unlike the Directive, domestic legislation does not require the Secretary of State to communicate its decision to restrict a company’s freedom to dispose of its assets to the competent authorities of other Member States.
Neučinkovito ohranjanje zahtevanega minimalnega kapitala: na ravni Združenega kraljestva oddelek 32(4) Zakona o zavarovalnicah iz leta 1982, kot je bil spremenjen, določa, da mora zavarovalnica, ko ne more ohranjati zahtevanega minimalnega kapitala, na zahtevo ministrstva predložiti načrt ponovne vzpostavitve dobrega finančnega stanja.
Failure to maintain the required solvency margin : at UK level, section 32(4) of the ICA 1982, as amended, prescribes that when an insurance company fails to maintain the required margin of solvency it must, at the request of the Secretary of State, submit to him a plan for the restoration of a sound financial position.
Če ministrstvo meni, da je načrt neustrezen, mora družba predlagati njegove spremembe.
If the Secretary of State considers the plan inadequate, the company must propose modifications to it.
Ko ministrstvo načrt sprejme, ga mora družba začeti izvajati.
Once the Secretary of State accepts the plan, the company must give effect to it.
Direktiva jasno določa, da mora pristojni organ domače države članice zahtevati načrt ponovne vzpostavitve dobrega finančnega stanja, če pride do takšnih nepravilnosti.
The Directive clearly prescribes that, should this irregularity occur, the competent authority of the home Member State must request the restoration plan.
V nasprotju s tem domača določba navaja, da mora družba „... na zahtevo ministrstva ...“ predložiti načrt ponovne vzpostavitve dobrega finančnega stanja.
By contrast, the domestic provision stipulates that the company must “… at the request of the Secretary of State…” submit a restoration plan.
Domača določba se lahko zato razlaga tako, kot da daje ministrstvu posebno pravico, da zahteva predložitev načrta ponovne vzpostavitve dobrega finančnega stanja, in mu ne nalaga obveznosti, da ga zahteva.
The domestic provision can thus be construed as conferring a prerogative to the Secretary of State to request the submission of the restoration plan, rather than imposing an obligation on him to request it.
Neučinkovito preprečevanje zmanjšanja minimalnega kapitala pod zajamčeni kapital: na ravni Združenega kraljestva oddelek 33 Zakona o zavarovalnicah, kot je bil spremenjen, določa, da mora zavarovalnica, ko se minimalni kapital zmanjša pod zajamčeni kapital (ena tretjina zahtevanega minimalnega kapitala), na zahtevo ministrstva predložiti kratkoročni finančni načrt.
Failure to prevent the solvency margin from falling below the guarantee fund : at UK level, section 33 of the ICA, as amended, prescribes that when the margin of solvency of an insurance company falls below the guarantee fund (one-third of a required margin of solvency), the company must, at the request of the Secretary of State, submit to him a short-term financial scheme.
Če ministrstvo meni, da je načrt neustrezen, mora družba predlagati njegove spremembe.
If the Secretary of State considers the scheme inadequate, the company must propose modifications to it.
Ko ministrstvo načrt sprejme, ga mora družba začeti izvajati.
Once the Secretary of State accepts the scheme, the company must give effect to it.
Zakon poudarja obveznost zavarovalnice, da predloži kratkoročni finančni načrt, vendar ministrstvu ne nalaga obveznosti, da ga zahteva.
The Act places the emphasis on the insurance company’s obligation to submit the short-term financial scheme but does not impose an obligation on the Secretary of State to request it.
Dolžnosti držav članic, na ozemlju katerih so sredstva: zakonodaja Združenega kraljestva predvideva možnost, da ministrstvo omeji prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe ES na zahtevo nadzornega organa domače države družbe.
Duties of the Member States where the assets are located : UK legislation does envisage the possibility that the Secretary of State may restrict an EC company’s freedom to dispose of its assets at the request of the supervisory authority of the company’s home State.
Pristojnost pristojnega organa glede prepovedi prostega razpolaganja s sredstvi: v skladu z zakonodajo Združenega kraljestva daje Zakon o zavarovalnicah iz leta 1982 ministrstvu pristojnost, da omeji prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe.
The power of the competent authority to prohibit the free disposal of assets: under UK legislation, the ICA 1982 confers on the Secretary of State the power to restrict a company’s freedom to dispose of its assets.
Oddelki 37, 40(A) in 45 Zakona o zavarovalnicah iz leta 1982 urejajo razloge za izvajanje teh pristojnosti in formalnosti, ki jih je treba upoštevati.
Sections 37, 40(A) and 45 of the ICA 1982 govern the grounds for the exercise of this power and the formalities to be observed.
Oddelek 37(3) Zakona določa naslednje razloge, na podlagi katerih lahko ministrstvo omeji prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe: ko ministrstvo da (in ne prekliče) navodilo, s katerim družbi odvzame (oddelek 11) ali prekliče (oddelek 12(A)) dovoljenje za opravljanje zavarovalnega posla; ko ministrstvo meni, da družba ni izpolnila obveznosti o ohranitvi minimalnega kapitala (oddelek 32) ali o lokaciji in valuti sredstev (oddelek 35); ko ministrstvo meni, da obveznosti družbe niso določene v skladu s predpisi o vrednotenju ali splošno sprejetimi računovodskimi metodami; ko ministrstvo meni, da družba ni pokrila obveznosti z dovolj varnimi, donosnimi in tržnimi naložbami (oddelek 35A).
Section 37(3) of the Act lays down the following grounds on the basis of which the Secretary of State may restrict a company’s freedom to dispose of its assets: where the Secretary of State has given (and not revoked) a direction withdrawing (section 11) or suspending (section 12(A)) a company’s authorisation to carry on insurance business; on the grounds that it appears to the Secretary of State that the company has failed to satisfy its obligation to maintain a minimum solvency margin (section 32) or has failed to comply with the obligations relating to the localisation and currency of the assets (section 35); on the grounds that it appears to the Secretary of State that the company’s liabilities have not been determined in accordance with valuation regulations or generally accepted accounting methods; on the grounds that it appears to the Secretary of State that the company has failed to cover its liabilities by assets of appropriate safety, yield and marketability (section 35A).
Oddelek 45 Zakona, kot je bil spremenjen s Predpisi o zavarovalnicah (direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju) iz leta 1994, daje ministrstvu preostalo pristojnost, da „sprejme ukrepe, za katere meni, da so primerni za zaščito zavarovancev ali potencialnih zavarovancev družbe pred tveganjem, da družba ne bi mogla izpolniti obveznosti ali da v primeru dolgoročnih poslov ne bi mogla izpolniti razumnih pričakovanj zavarovancev ali potencialnih zavarovancev“.
Section 45 of the Act, as amended by the Insurance Companies (Third Insurance Directives) Regulations 1994, confers on the Secretary of State a residual power “to take such action as appears to him to be appropriate for the purpose of protecting policyholders or potential policyholders of the company against the risk that the company may be unable to meet its liabilities or, in the case of long-term business, to fulfil the reasonable expectations of policyholders or potential policyholders”.
Takšna preostala pristojnost, ki se lahko izvaja le, kadar ministrstvo meni, da tem namenom ni mogoče ustrezno zadostiti z izvajanjem pristojnosti, izrecno navedenih v Zakonu in oddelkih od 38 do 44, vključuje pristojnost ministrstva, da omeji prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe.
Such residual power, which can only be exercised when the Secretary of State considers that those purposes cannot be appropriately achieved by the exercise of the powers expressly mentioned by the Act in sections 38 to 44, includes the Secretary of State’s power to restrict the company’s freedom to dispose of its assets.
Odstavek 2 oddelka 45 dejansko ponavlja razloge iz oddelka 37(3), na podlagi katerih lahko ministrstvo omeji prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe.
Paragraph 2 of section 45 basically reiterates the grounds enumerated by section 37(3) on the basis of which the Secretary of State may restrict the company’s freedom to dispose of its assets.
Zakon glede formalnosti, ki jih je treba upoštevati, določa, da mora ministrstvo pri izvajanju katere koli pristojnosti iz Zakona „navesti razlog, na podlagi katerega jo izvaja“.
With respect to the formalities to be observed, the Act prescribes that when exercising any of the powers conferred by the Act, the Secretary of State must “state the ground on which he is exercising it”.
Če želi ministrstvo omejiti prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe, mora od sodišča zahtevati sodno prepoved.
To restrict a company’s freedom to dispose of its assets, the Secretary of State must apply to the Court for an injunction.
Oddelek 40A določa pogoje, pod katerimi lahko sodišče na zahtevo ministrstva odobri to prepoved.
Section 40A prescribes the conditions under which the Court may, on the application of the Secretary of State, grant the requested injunction.
Takšna omejitev je omejena na vrednost „obveznosti ES“ družbe.
Such restriction is limited to the value of the company’s “EC liabilities”.
Zgoraj navedene določbe so razlog, da so pristojnosti ministrstva glede zamrznitve sredstev družbe v skladu z zakonodajo Združenega kraljestva širše od pristojnosti, ki jih imajo pristojni organi držav članic v skladu z direktivo.
It stems from the provisions cited above that the power of the Secretary of State to freeze a company’s assets under UK legislation is broader than that conferred by the Directive to Member State’s competent authorities.
Tako lahko ministrstvo omeji prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe v več okoliščinah, kot so izjemoma predvidene v direktivi.
In other words, the Secretary of State can restrict a company’s freedom to dispose of its assets in more circumstances than those exceptionally envisaged by the Directive.
Vendar je treba pri izvajanju pristojnosti ministrstva glede zamrznitve sredstev družbe upoštevati posebne formalnosti, vključno s tem, da je treba na sodišču vložiti zahtevek za sodno prepoved, česar direktiva ne določa.
The exercise by the Secretary of State of his power to freeze a company’s assets is subject, however, to the observance of special formalities - including the need to apply before a court for an injunction – which are not prescribed by the Directive.
Uporaba člena 12 v primeru krize družbe Equitable Life je nejasna.
The applicability of Article 12 to the Equitable Life crisis is unclear.
Zakonodajalec Združenega kraljestva je dejal, da ta člen ni pomemben, neukrepanje v devetdesetih letih 20. stoletja pa je upravičil z izjavo, da „je bila družba Equitable Life vedno solventna, v svojih regulativnih poročilih pa je vedno navedla, da izpolnjuje regulativne zahteve o solventnosti“ (David STRACHAN, kot je navedeno v H4).
The UK regulator claimed that this article was not relevant and justified its lack of intervention in the 1990’s by stating that, "Equitable has always been solvent and in its regulatory returns it has always reported that it is currently meeting its regulatory solvency requirements" (David STRACHAN, as stated in H4).
Glede na to, da je družba ELAS uradno vedno upoštevala minimalni kapital, odstavek 3 člena ni bil nikoli uporabljen.
Given that the solvency margin was always formally respected by ELAS, paragraph 3 of the article was never activated.
Za dodatne informacije glej oddelek v zvezi s členom 25 o minimalnem kapitalu in del III o zakonodajnih ukrepih.
For further information on this point, see the section on Article 25 on the Solvency margin and Part III on Regulatory Action.
Razlike med tretjo direktivo o življenjskem zavarovanju in izvedbenimi določbami: Zakonodaja Združenega kraljestva daje v skladu s tretjo direktivo o življenjskem zavarovanju ministrstvu pristojnost, da ukrepa v primeru zavarovalnic, ki imajo finančne težave.
Divergences between the 3LD and implementing provisions: UK legislation confers to the Secretary of State the power, in line with the 3LD, to intervene in the case of assurance undertakings facing financial difficulties.
Vendar lahko ministrstvo v nasprotju z direktivo zahteva, da se predloži načrt ponovne vzpostavitve dobrega finančnega stanja ali kratek finančni načrt.
However, contrary to the Directive, the Secretary of State may request the submission of a restoration plan or a short finance scheme.
Poleg tega lahko ministrstvo omeji prosto razpolaganje s sredstvi družbe v več okoliščinah, kot so predvidene v tretji direktivi o življenjskem zavarovanju.
In addition, the Secretary of State may restrict the company’s freedom to dispose of its assets in more circumstances than those envisaged by the 3LD.
Člen 13 – Odvzem dovoljenja (člen 26 prve direktive o življenjskem zavarovanju in člen 39 kodificirane direktive)
Article 13 - Withdrawal of authorisation (Articles 26 of 1LD and 39 of CD)
Ta člen usklajuje razloge, na podlagi katerih lahko pristojni organ domače države članice zavarovalnici odvzame dovoljenje.
This article harmonises the grounds for withdrawal of authorisation in respect of an assurance company by the competent authority of the home Member State.
Poleg tega ta določba domači in tuji državi članici v primeru odvzema nalaga nekaj obveznosti.
In addition, this provision places some obligations on the home Member State and on the host Member State in the event of withdrawal.
Obravnava tudi nekaj postopkovnih formalnosti, ki jih je treba upoštevati.
It also deals with some procedural formalities that must be observed.
„Člen 26
'Article 26
Dovoljenje, ki ga je zavarovalnici izdal pristojni organ njene domače države članice, lahko navedeni organ odvzame, če zavarovalnica:
Authorization granted to an assurance undertaking by the competent authority of its home Member State may be withdrawn by that authority if that undertaking:
(a) ne uporabi dovoljenja v roku 12 mesecev, se mu izrecno odreče ali preneha opravljati dejavnosti za več kakor šest mesecev, razen če je zadevna država članica predvidela, da dovoljenje v takšnih primerih preneha veljati;
(a) does not make use of the authorization within 12 months, expressly renounces it or ceases to carry on business for more than six months, unless the Member State concerned has made provision for authorization to lapse in such cases;
(b) ne izpolnjuje več pogojev za pridobitev dovoljenja;
(b) no longer fulfils the conditions for admission;
(c) v dovoljenem času ni mogla sprejeti ukrepov, navedenih v načrtu ponovne vzpostavitve dobrega finančnega stanja ali finančnem načrtu iz člena 24;
(c) has been unable, within the time allowed, to take the measures specified in the restoration plan or finance scheme referred to in Article 24;
(d) resno ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti iz predpisov, ki veljajo zanjo.
(d) fails seriously in its obligations under the regulations to which it is subject.
V primeru odvzema ali prenehanja veljavnosti dovoljenja pristojni organ domače države članice o tem obvesti pristojne organe drugih držav članic, te pa sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi preprečijo, da bi zavarovalnica na njihovih ozemljih začela opravljati nove dejavnosti, bodisi iz naslova pravice do ustanavljanja bodisi iz naslova svobode opravljanja storitev.
In the event of the withdrawal or lapse of the authorization, the competent authority of the home Member State shall notify the competent authorities of the other Member States accordingly and they shall take appropriate measures to prevent the undertaking from commencing new operations within their territories, under either the freedom of establishment or the freedom to provide services.