natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V primeru plačilnih sistemov, ki temeljijo na informacijski tehnologiji, računovodja preveri varnost in zanesljivost teh sistemov.
“In the case of IT-based payment systems, the accounting officer shall validate the security and reliability of such systems.”
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 19Člen 50 a, (Uredba (ES) št. 1653/2004)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 19Article 50 a (Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004)
Člen 265a Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 se smiselno uporablja za izbiro strokovnjakov, ki se plačajo na podlagi fiksnega zneska, za pomoč agenciji zlasti pri ocenjevanju predlogov in vlog za donacije ali javnih naročil ter za tehnično pomoč v nadaljevanju postopka in končno oceno projektov.
Article 265a of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 shall apply mutatis mutandis for the selection of experts, to be paid on the basis of a fixed amount, for assisting the agency, in particular in evaluating proposals and grant applications or tenders for procurement, and for providing technical assistance in the follow-up to, and final evaluation of projects.
Agencije lahko uporabijo tudi sezname strokovnjakov, ki jih pripravi Komisija.
The agencies may also use the lists of experts drawn up by the Commission.’
Agencije lahko tudi uporabijo seznam strokovnjakov, ki ga pripravi Komisija.
The agencies may also use the lists of experts drawn up by the Commission.’
Seznam imen strokovnjakov, ki so v zadevnem proračunskem letu sodelovali z agencijo, in prejemkov, ki so jih prejeli ti strokovnjaki, je vključen v poročilo izvajalske agencije o proračunskem in finančnem upravljanju za proračunski organ, pri čemer se upošteva varstvo osebnih podatkov.
A list with the names of the experts who cooperated with the agency during the financial year in question and the remuneration received by these experts shall be attached to the executive agency's report on budgetary and financial management to the budgetary authority, taking due account of the protection of personal data.
Proračunski organ mora imeti možnost, da nadzira zaposlovanje zunanjih strokovnjakov v izvajalskih agencijah.
The budgetary authority should be enabled to monitor the use of external experts by the executive agencies .
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 21 A (novo)Člen 66, odstavek 1 (Uredba (ES) št. 1653/2004)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 21 A (new)Article 66, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004)
(21a) V členu 66 se prvi odstavek nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(21a) In Article 66, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
"Na priporočilo Sveta, ki odloča s kvalificirano večino, Evropski parlament direktorju podeli razrešnico glede izvrševanja upravnega proračuna za leto n najkasneje do 29. aprila leta N + 2.
" The European Parliament, upon a recommendation from the Council, which shall decide by qualified majority, shall give a discharge to the director in respect of the implementation of the administrative budget for year N by no later than 29 April of year N+2 .
Direktor obvesti upravni odbor o ugotovitvah Evropskega parlamenta, navedenih v resoluciji, ki je priložena sklepu o razrešnici."
The director shall inform the management board of the observations of the European Parliament contained in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision."
Pravna podlaga in opredelitev „izvajalske agencije“
I. Legal bases and definition of ‘executive agency’
Komisija za nekatere naloge pri upravljanju programov Skupnosti pooblasti t. i. izvajalske agencije.
The Commission delegates a number of tasks relating to the administration of Community programmes to Executive Agencies (hereinafter: EAs).
Člen 55(1) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
Article 55(1) of the Regulation (EC, Euratom) No. 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1525/2007 (UL L 343, 27.12.2007, str.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1525/2007 (OJ L 343, 27.12.2007, p.
9). pod določenimi pogoji načeloma dopušča to dodeljevanje nalog javne oblasti tretjim osebam in opredeljuje izvajalsko agencijo na naslednji način: „Izvajalske agencije so pravne osebe, ki jih ureja pravo Skupnosti in ki jih ustanovi Komisija s sklepom, na katere se lahko prenesejo pooblastila za izvajanje celotnega programa ali projekta Skupnosti ali njegovega dela v imenu Komisije in pod njeno odgovornostjo.“
9). permits the delegation to third parties of public authority tasks in principle under certain conditions, and defines an EA as follows: ‘The executive agencies shall be legal persons under Community law created by Community decision to which powers can be delegated to implement all or part of a Community programme or project on behalf of the Commission and under its responsibility’.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 58/2003
Council Regulation (EC) No. 58/2003
1. z dne 19. decembra 2002 o statutu izvajalskih agencij, pooblaščenih za izvajanje nekaterih nalog pri upravljanju programov Skupnosti, zagotavlja dodatne pogoje, pod katerimi lahko delujejo izvajalske agencije.
1. of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes provides further details on the conditions under which EAs may operate.
Člen 15 navedene uredbe določa, da mora Komisija sprejeti „standardno finančno uredbo“ za izvajalske agencije.
Article 15 of this Regulation states that the Commission must adopt a ‘standard financial regulation’ for EAs.
Izrecno je določeno, da se lahko standardna finančna uredba od splošne finančne uredbe, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (glej zgoraj), razlikuje le, če to zahtevajo posebne delovne zahtev izvajalskih agencij .
It expressly stipulates that this may deviate from the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (see above) only if the specific operating requirements of the executive agencies so require .
Ta standardna finančna uredba za izvajalske agencije je vključena v predloženo poročilo, ker jo želi Evropska komisija spremeniti, ker
It is this standard financial regulation for EAs which is the subject of this report, since the Commission wishes to amend it on the grounds that:
· jo je treba prilagoditi na spremenjene določbe finančne uredbe EU,
· it needs to be adapted to the amended provisions of the EU Financial Regulation,
· so potrebne dodatne spremembe na podlagi do zdaj pridobljenih izkušenj z izvajalskimi agencijami
· other amendments have become necessary in the light of experience gathered by the existing executive agencies,
· je treba poenostaviti objavo operativnega proračuna agencij, ne da bi se pri tem okrnile pravice proračunskega organa in Računskega sodišča,
· the publication of the administrative budget of agencies should be simplified while preserving the prerogatives of the budgetary authority and the Court of Auditors,
· se je postopek glede prerazporeditev, ki naj bi ga sprejeli direktorji agencij, „izkazal za nejasnega in dolgotrajnega ter ga je zato treba racionalizirati in pospešiti“.
· the procedure regarding transfers to be adopted by the directors of agencies has proved to be ‘unclear and time consuming’ and should therefore be ‘streamlined and accelerated’.
Zgodovina nastanka izvajalskih agencij
Background to the creation of the Executive Agencies
Izvajalske agencije bi morale nadomestiti Urade Komisije za tehnično pomoč, o katerih so se že med škandalom leta 1999 pojavljala razhajajoča se mnenja.
The EAs were intended to be a substitute for the Commission’s highly controversial Technical Assistance Offices (TAOs/BATs) following the scandals in 1999.
Ustanovijo in likvidirajo se s sklepom Komisije (člen 3 Uredbe 58/2003).
They are set up and wound up by a simple decision of the Commission (Article 3 of Regulation 58/2003).
Upoštevati je treba tudi Kodeks ravnanja, ki je priložen resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta za drugo obravnavo proračuna za leto 2008 – Priloga III
They are also governed by a code of conduct, which is appended to the European Parliament resolution on the second reading of the 2008 budget (Annex III)
Izvajalske agencije se financirajo z operativnimi sredstvi programa.
EAs are financed out of a programme’s operational funding.
Imajo lastne proračunske postavke, odobrena sredstva iz te postavke pa se v celoti odštejejo od dodeljenih finančnih sredstev za program.
They have their own budget lines, but the appropriations for these lines are drawn entirely from the budget for the programmes.
To pomeni, da stroški izvajalske agencije (plače, dodatni stroški itd.) ustrezno zmanjšajo operativna sredstva „njenega“ programa
In other words, the cost of an executive agency (salaries, ancillary costs, etc.) reduces by a corresponding amount the operational funding available to ‘its’ programme.
Delovni dokument št. 2 o Evropski uniji in njenih agencijah - Izvajalske agencije - prvi razmislek in obeti za prihodnost – Poročevalka: Jutta Haug.
Working Document N° 2 on the European Union and its agencies - Executive agencies - first reflections and future prospects – Rapporteur: Jutta Haug.
PE 388.322v01-00, str.
PE 388.322v01-00, p.
To pomeni tudi, da se, čeprav gre pri njihovem delovanju za upravne stroške, ne financirajo iz postavke 5 večletnega finančnega okvira, ampak se uradno pripišejo odhodkom iz poslovanja.
This also means that, although their operation is de facto administrative expenditure, agencies are not financed under Heading 5 of the Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF), but are formally considered operational expenditure.
Plače uslužbencev izvajalske agencije, ki so uradniki, dodeljeni iz ustreznih GD Komisije, se tako financirajo iz operativnih sredstev programa, in sicer iz ustrezne postavke večletnega finančnega okvira, in ne iz postavke 5.
Even the salaries of those staff members of the executive agency who are seconded officials from the Commission's parent DG are thus financed from the operational programme funds under the relevant heading of the MFF and not under Heading 5.
Obstoječe izvajalske agencije
Existing Executive Agencies
Trenutno obstajajo štiri izvajalske agencije:
There are currently four EAs:
Izvajalska agencija za inteligentno energijo (v nadaljevanju „agencija CIP“);
– Executive Agency for Intelligent Energy (hereinafter "CIP-EA");
– Izvajalska agencija za izobraževanje, avdiovizualne storitve in kulturo (EACEA);
– Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA);
– Izvajalska agencija za program javnega zdravja (PHEA);
– Executive Agency for the Public Health Programme (PHEA);
– Izvajalska agencija za vseevropska prometna omrežja (TENT EA).
– Executive Agency for the Trans-European Transport Networks (TENT EA).
Poleg tega je za leto 2009 načrtovana ustanovitev izvajalske agencije za Evropski svet za raziskave za izvajanje dela „Zamisli“ 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave ter „raziskovalne izvajalske agencije“ za izvajanje raziskav malih in srednje velikih podjetij, ukrepov Marie Curie in raziskav na področju vesolja in varnosti.
A further EA, for the European Research Council, is due to be created from 2009 to implement parts of the 7 th Research Framework Programme (‘Ideas’ Section), together with a ‘Research EA’ to implement the ‘Research for SMEs’, ‘Marie Curie actions’ and ‘Security and Space’ themes.
V Prilogi I je tabela, v kateri je poročevalka predstavila, katere programe upravljajo zadevne izvajalske agencije, kolikšen odstotek operativnih sredstev se porabi za delovanje izvajalske agencije ter kako se osebje posamezne izvajalske agencije deli na uradnike, pogodbene uslužbence in začasne uslužbence (v skladu z dokumentom, ki ga je Komisija predložila EP maja 2007).
In Annex I your rapporteur has compiled a table showing which programmes are administered by the EA in question and what percentage of operational funds are used for the operation of the EA, and giving a breakdown of the staff of each EA into officials, contract staff, and temporary staff (on the basis of a document of May 2007 supplied to Parliament by the Commission).
Predlogi sprememb
The amendments
Načeloma se lahko sprejmejo spremembe standardne finančne uredbe, ki jih je predložila Komisija, vendar je treba sprejeti dodatne spremembe, da bo besedilo standardne finančne uredbe še bolj upoštevalo splošne smernice finančne uredbe EU, ker se obe besedili lahko razlikujeta le, če to zahtevajo posebne delovne razmere izvajalske agencije. besedili se lahko razlikujeta le, če to zahtevajo posebne delovne zahtev izvajalskih agencij .
While the Commission’s proposed amendments to the standard financial regulation are accepted in principle, further amendments are needed in order to align the text of the standard financial regulation still more closely with the guidelines of the EU Financial Regulation, which take precedence: the two texts may diverge only if the specific operating requirements of the executive agencies so require .
Cilj nekaterih predlogov sprememb je uskladiti besedilo te standardne finančne uredbe s skupnimi izjavami julijskega spravnega sestanka s Svetom o „namenskih prejemkih“ in „decentraliziranih agencijah“ (glej Prilogo II).
Some of the amendments seek to bring the text of this standard financial regulation into line with the Joint Statements of the July conciliation with the Council under the headings ‘Assigned Revenues’ and ‘Executive Agencies’. (see Annex II).
Drugi predlogi sprememb želijo zagotoviti proračunskemu organu boljši pregled nad dejanskim številom uslužbencev izvajalske agencije, vključno z začasnimi in pogodbenimi uslužbenci ter nacionalnimi strokovnjaki.
Others aim to create a better insight for the budgetary authority into the actual numbers of staff employed by the EAs, whether they be contract or temporary staff or seconded national experts.
Na splošno se mora izboljšati obveznost poročanja izvajalskih agencij proračunskemu organu, v zvezi s čimer je treba predložiti predloge sprememb.
In a general way, improvements are needed as regards the EAs’ reporting requirement to the budgetary authority, and amendments to this effect have also been tabled.
Obstoječe in načrtovane izvajalske agencije – osebje, upravljanje programa in odstotek operativnih/upravnih sredstev
Existing and proposed Executive Agencies – Staffing , programmes administered and percentage of operational / administrative funds
Program, ki se izvaja
Programme administered
Število začasnih uslužbencev
of whom tempor ary
Odstotek operativnega programa v izvajalski agenciji
Percentage of operational programme spent on EA
IEEA Izvajalska agencija za inteligentno energijo (prihodnja „izvajalska agencija CIP“)
IEEA (Executive Agency for Intelligent Energy (hereinafter "CIP EA")
Inteligentna energija za Evropo, CIP, Marco Polo I in II
"Intelligent Energy Europe", "CIP", "Marco Polo I & II"
Vseživljenjsko učenje, Kultura 2007, Mladi v akciji, Evropa za državljane, Sodelovanje med ES in ZDA, MEDIA 2007, Erasmus Mundus in zunanje sodelovanje, Eurydice, TEMPUS
"Lifelong learning", "Culture 2007", "Youth in Action", "Europe for Citizens", "EC/US-Cooperation", "MEDIA 2007", "Erasmus Mundus and external cooperation", "Eurydice", "TEMPUS"
PHEA (Izvajalska agencija za javno zdravje)
PHEA (Public Health EA)
Zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov; Boljše usposabljanje za program za varnejšo hrano
"Health and Consumer Protection"; "Better Training for safer food programme"
TENT (Izvajalska agencija za vseevropsko prometno omrežje)
TENT (EA for Trans-European Networks -Transport)
Vseevropsko prometno omrežje
Trans-European Transport Networks
podatki niso na voljo
figures not available
Evropska železniška agencija ERA, raziskovalna izvajalska agencija-E.
ERA EA Research EA.
načrtovano za leto 2009
scheduled for 2009
SKUPNA IZJAVA Ekonomsko-finančnega sveta za proračun - Spravni sestanek EP-Svet 13. julija 2007
JOINT STATEMENTS ECOFIN (Budget) COUNCIL - Conciliation Meeting EP- Council 13 July 2007
"Evropski parlament in Svet pozdravljata vsa prizadevanja za zboljšanje učinkovitosti metod, ki jih Evropska komisija uporablja za izvajanje politik in programov EU.
"The European Parliament and the Council welcomes all efforts to improve the efficiency of the methods used by the European Commission to implement EU policies and programmes.
Vzpostavitev izvajalskih agencij lahko prispeva k takšni učinkovitosti, vendar le v primeru, da se pri tej metodi dosledno upošteva načelo dobrega finančnega upravljanja in popolne preglednosti.
The creation of executive agencies can constitute a contribution to such efficiency, but only if this method fully respects the principle of sound financial management and total transparency.
a. vire v smislu odobrenih proračunskih sredstev in uslužbencev, potrebnih za delovanje izvajalske agencije, ob razčlenitvi stroškov za uslužbence (stalni in začasni uradniki ter pogodbeni sodelavci) ter drugih upravnih odhodkov;
a. the resources in terms of appropriations and staff required to run the executive agency, showing a breakdown of staff expenditure (permanent and temporary officials and contractual agents) and other administrative expenditure;
b. načrtovane napotitve uradnikov Komisije na izvajalsko agencijo;
b. the planned secondments of officials from the Commission to the executive agency;
c. upravne vire, pridobljene s prenosom nalog z oddelkov Komisije na izvajalsko agencijo in prerazporeditvijo človeških virov; zlasti o številu zaposlenih (vključno z zunanjimi uslužbenci), ki je v okviru Komisije dodeljeno za vsako zadevno nalogo, številu teh zaposlenih, ki bodo premeščeni v predlagano novo ali razširjeno agencijo, številu delovnih mest, ki bodo zaradi tega v Komisiji zamrznjena, in številu zaposlenih v Komisiji, ki naj bi jih zaradi tega predvidoma prerazporedili na druge naloge;
c. administrative resources freed by transferring tasks from the Commission departments to the executive agency, and the re-allocation of the human resources; in particular the number of staff (including external staff) assigned to each relevant task within the Commission, the number of this staff to be transferred to a proposed new or enlarged agency, the number of Commission posts to be frozen as a consequence and the number of Commission staff to be proposed to be redeployed to other tasks;
e. prednosti, ki jih predstavlja prenos nalog izvrševanja na izvajalsko agencijo, v primerjavi z neposrednim upravljanjem s strani služb Komisije: primerjave možnosti "neposrednega upravljanja s strani služb Komisije" z možnostjo "izvajalske agencije" temeljijo na virih, uporabljenih za izvajanje obstoječega programa oziroma programov, in njegovi oziroma njihovi trenutni obliki, da se oblikuje trdna in dejanska osnova za primerjavo; pri novih programih in programih, katerih obseg se veča, se bo upošteval tudi razvoj z njimi povezanega finančnega okvira, ki naj bi ga agencija upravljala;
e. the advantages of delegating implementing tasks to an executive agency versus direct management by the Commission services: any comparison of a "Direct management by the Commission services"-scenario to an "executive agency"-scenario shall be based on the resources used to implement the existing programme(s) and its (their) current form in order to have a sound and factual basis for comparison; for new and expanding programmes the evolution of the related financial envelope to be managed by the agency will also be taken into consideration;
f. osnutek kadrovskega načrta, razčlenjenega po razredih in kategorijah, ter o utemeljeni oceni načrtovanega števila pogodbenih sodelavcev, ki so začasno financirani iz proračuna;
f. a draft establishment plan per grade and per category as well as a well-founded estimate of the number of contractual agents planned and provisionally budgeted;
g. jasno razčlenitev vseh akterjev, ki sodelujejo pri izvedbenem programu, vključno s preostalim delom sredstev za operativni program, za izvajanje katerega so pristojni (Komisija, izvajalske agencije, drugi uradi za tehnično pomoč, države članice, nacionalne agencije itd.).
g. a clear breakdown of all actors involved in the implementation programme including the remaining share of the operational programme envelope for the implementation of which they are responsible (Commission, executive agencies, remaining Technical Assistance Offices, Member States, national agencies, etc.)
P6_TA (2007)0616, 13. december 2007.
P6_TA(2007)0616 of 13 December 2007.
a. vire v smislu sredstev in uslužbencev, ki so potrebni za delovanje izvajalske agencije, v obliki razčlenjenih odhodkov, povezanih z zaposlenimi (dodeljeni uslužbenci, začasni uslužbenci, ki jih je neposredno zaposlila izvajalska agencija, in pogodbeni uslužbenci), ter druge upravne odhodke;
a. the resources in terms of appropriations and staff required to run the Executive Agency, showing a breakdown of staff expenditure (seconded officials, temporary staff recruited directly by the Executive Agency and contractual staff) and other administrative expenditure;
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL (*)
o osnutku uredbe Komisije (ES) o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1653/2004 o standardni finančni uredbi za izvajalske agencije v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 58/2003 o statutu izvajalskih agencij, pooblaščenih za izvajanje nekaterih nalog pri upravljanju programov Skupnosti
on the draft Commission regulation (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 on a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes
Uvodna izjava 3 A (novo)
RECITAL 3 A (new)
(3a) dejstvo, da je razrešnica glede administrativnega proračuna za direktorja agencije ločena od razrešnice v zvezi z izvrševanjem operativnih sredstev agencije, povezanih s programi Skupnosti, lahko poslabša jasnost postopka razrešnic, če bi se število agencij povečalo.
(3a) The fact that the discharge to the director of the agency in respect of the administrative budget is distinguished from the discharge in respect of the implementation by the agency of operational approp ria tions relating to Community programmes may endanger the clarity of the discharge procedure in the event of a proliferation of executive agencies.
Uvodna izjava 3 B (novo)
RECITAL 3 B (new)
(3b) zaradi razlike med roki za sklep Evropskega parlamenta o razrešnici glede splošnega proračuna (15. maja leta n+2) in za sklep o razrešnici glede izvajalskih agencij (29. aprila leta n+2), se morajo v prihodnosti vsi zadevni akterji izogibati težav v praksi in si prizadevati za uskladitev pravne podlage.
(3b) In consideration of the difference in deadlines for the European Parliament's discharge decision in respect of the general budget, which is 15 May of year n+2, and its discharge decision in respect of the executive agencies, which is 29 April of year n+2, all actors involved should try to avoid difficulties in practice and strive for a harmonisation of the legal bases in the future.
(9a) razjasniti je treba, da je upravni odbor ali usmerjevalni odbor (določi ju Komisija, ki mora tudi zagotoviti, da so člani odbora primerno usposobljeni in da niso v navzkrižju interesov) odgovoren za nekatera vprašanja proračuna in kontrole ter zato odgovarja organu za podeljevanje razrešnice .
(9a) It should be clarified that the management board or steering committee - which is appointed by the Commission, the Commission being therefore responsible for ensuring that the board members possess the necessary qualifications and are not subject to any conflict of interest - bears certain responsibilities for budget and control issues and should therefore be accountable to the discharge authority.
Povzetek dokončno sprejetega proračuna in sprememb proračuna se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v treh mesecih od sprejetja.
A summary of the budget and amending budgets, as finally adopted, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union within three months of their adoption.