natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vsaka država članica Komisiji poroča na podlagi povzetka o vrstah šibkih točk, tveganj in groženj, ugotovljenih v vsakem sektorju, navedenem v Prilogi I, v roku 18 mesecev po sprejetju seznama iz člena 4(2) in zatem vsaki dve leti.
Each Member State shall report to the Commission on a summary basis on the types of vulnerabilities, threats and risks encountered in each sector referred to in Annex I within 18 months following the adoption of the list provided for in Article 4(2) and thereafter on an ongoing basis every two years.
Vsaka država članica Komisiji poroča na podlagi povzetka o vrstah šibkih točk, tveganj in groženj, ugotovljenih v vsakem sektorju, navedenem v Prilogi I, v roku 12 mesecev po sprejetju seznama iz člena 4(2) in zatem vsaki dve leti.
Each Member State shall report to the Commission on a summary basis on the types of vulnerabilities, threats and risks encountered in each sector referred to in Annex I within 12 months following the adoption of the list provided for in Article 4(2) and thereafter on an ongoing basis every two years.
Komisija na zahtevo držav članic podpre lastnike/upravljavce določenih evropskih ključnih infrastruktur z zagotavljanjem dostopa do razpoložljivih najboljših praks in metodologij, povezanih z varovanjem ključne infrastrukture.
At the request of the Member States, the Commission shall support the owners/operators of designated European Critical Infrastructures by providing access to available best practices and methodologies related to critical infrastructure protection.
Predlog spremembe zagotavlja vključitev držav članic.
Ensuring Member States’ involvement.
Vsaka oseba, ki ravna z zaupnimi informacijami v skladu s to direktivo v imenu države članice, ima najboljšo možno stopnjo varnosti, ki jo preverja zadevna država članica.
Any person handling confidential information pursuant to this Directive on behalf of a Member State shall have a best possible level of security vetting by the Member State concerned.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se informacije o varovanju ključne infrastrukture, posredovane državam članicam ali Komisiji, uporabijo izključno za namen varovanja ključnih infrastruktur.
Member States shall ensure that Critical Infrastructure Protection Information submitted to the Member States or to the Commission, is not used for any purpose other than the protection of critical infrastructures.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se informacije o varovanju ključne infrastrukture, posredovane državam članicam ali Komisiji, uporabijo izključno za namen varovanja ključnih infrastruktur ter da se obvezno upoštevajo načelo sorazmernosti z materialnega vidika in temeljne pravice in ustanove, vredne zaščite .
Member States shall ensure that Critical Infrastructure Protection Information submitted to the Member States or to the Commission, is not used for any purpose other than the protection of critical infrastructures and that due account is taken of the principle of proportionality from a material point of view and of fundamental rights and institutions which should be protected .
K drugim temeljnim pravicam in ustanovam spadajo na primer varstvo podatkov in tajnost telekomunikacijskih sporočil.
Fundamental rights and institutions which should be protected include inter alia data protection and telecommunications secrecy.
Komisiji pomaga Odbor, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki vsake kontaktne točke za varovanje ključne infrastrukture .
The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee composed of a representative of each CIP Contact Point .
Komisiji pomaga Odbor, ki ga sestavljajo pristojni predstavniki vseh držav članic.
The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee composed of a responsible representative of each Member State .
Priloga I, sektor VII, podsektor 9 a (novo)
Annex I, Sector VII, Sub-sector 9 a (new)
Ugotavljanje in določanje evropske ključne infrastrukture ter ocena potrebe za izboljšanje njenega varovanja
Identification, designation and protection of European Critical Infrastructure
o predlogu Direktive Sveta o ugotavljanju in določanju evropske ključne infrastrukture ter o oceni potrebe po izboljšanju njenega varovanja
on the proposal for a Council directive on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection
Ključna infrastruktura so fizični in informacijsko-tehnološki objekti, omrežja, storitve in oprema, katerih okvara ali uničenje bi resno vplivala na zdravje, varnost ali gospodarsko dobrobit državljanov ter na učinkovito delovanje vlad držav članic.
Critical infrastructures are physical and IT installations, networks, services and assets whose disruption or destruction would have serious implications for the health, safety or economic well-being of citizens and for efficient governance in the Member States.
Ključne infrastrukture v EU so med sabo tesno povezane in druga od druge v veliki meri odvisne, zato so dovzetnejše za okvare in uničenje.
Critical infrastructures in the EU are closely linked with one another and there is a high degree of reciprocal dependence in this area, which is why they are more vulnerable to disruption and destruction.
Pogodba o Ustavi za Evropo (v členu I-43) določa: „Unija in njene države članice delujejo skupaj v duhu solidarnosti, če je kakšna država članica žrtev terorističnega napada, naravne nesreče ali nesreče, ki jo je povzročil človek.“
The Treaty on a Constitution for Europe puts it like this (in Article I-43): ‘The Union and its Member States shall act jointly in a spirit of solidarity if a Member State is the object of a terrorist attack or the victim of a natural or man-made disaster’.
Državljane EU je treba v okviru celostne evropske strategije varovati ne le pred terorističnimi napadi, temveč tudi pred naravnimi katastrofami ali nesrečami.
There is a need to protect EU citizens as part of an integrated European strategy not just from terrorist attacks but also from natural disasters or accidents.
Posledice teh pojavov pogosto segajo preko meja držav članic, zato si morajo slednje med sabo pomagati in vzpostaviti sistem odzivanja na krizne razmere na ravni Skupnosti.
These events often have cross-border consequences, making it necessary for the Member States to help one another and set up a crisis response system at Community level.
Učinkovita strategija bi morala veliko vrednost pripisovati tako preprečevanju kot ukrepom za odpravo posledic napadov in katastrof.
An effective strategy should set a high value on both prevention and measures to repair the consequences of attacks and disasters.
Evropski sistem zgodnjega opozarjanja je pri ključni infrastrukturi uspešen le, če spodbuja izmenjavo informacij o skupnih virih nevarnosti ter oblikuje ustrezne ukrepe in strategije za zmanjšanje tveganja in zagotavljanje učinkovitejšega varovanja ključne infrastrukture.
A European early-warning system for critical infrastructure can only be successful if it encourages the exchange of information on common sources of danger and devises appropriate measures and strategies for minimising their risk and providing more effective critical infrastructure protection.
Številni deli infrastrukture ne pripadajo državi, zato morajo biti v varnostne in nadzorne ukrepe vključeni javni in zasebni organi.
As many parts of the infrastructure do not belong to the State, both public and private bodies must be involved in safety and control measures.
Sodelovanje in usklajevanje
Cooperation and coordination
Za varovanje ključne infrastrukture je treba skleniti trajno in na sodelovanju temelječe partnerstvo med lastniki in upravljavci zadevne infrastrukture ter pristojnimi organi v državah članicah.
To protect critical infrastructures, there is a need for ongoing and cooperative partnership between the owners and operators of the infrastructures concerned and the appropriate authorities in the Member States.
Za zagotovitev interoperabilnosti je treba vzpostaviti sistem analize tveganj na evropski ravni.
At European level a risk analysis system should be set up to ensure interoperability.
Veliko bolj je važna večja združljivost in učinkovitost sistemov.
Rather it is important that systems should be more compatible and effective.
V primerih, ko ni sektorskih standardov in še ni mednarodnih norm, bi morali v Evropskem odboru za standardizacijo in v drugih organih za standardizacijo predlagati enotne, sektorske in prilagojene varnostne standarde za vse udeležene sektorje.
In cases for which there are no sector-specific standards or as yet no international norms, the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) and other standards bodies should put forward uniform, sector-specific and adapted safety standards for all the sectors concerned.
Takšne standarde bi morala predlagati tudi ISO na mednarodni ravni, da bi bili v tem oziru vzpostavljeni enaki pogoji.
Such standards should also be proposed at international level by the ISO so as to create the same conditions in this regard.
Pomembne informacije bi bilo treba ne glede na njihov izvor obravnavati skrbno, zanesljivo in po potrebi tudi zaupno, čeprav mora biti parlamentarni nadzor vedno zagotovljen.
The relevant information should be treated carefully, reliably and if need be confidentially irrespective of its source, even if parliamentary scrutiny must always be guaranteed.
Komunikacijska omrežja in informacijski sistemi so postali pomemben vidik gospodarskega in družbenega življenja.
Communications networks and information systems have become an essential aspect of economic and social life.
Zaradi tega je varnost, predvsem pa razpoložljivost teh omrežij in sistemov vedno pomembnejša.
Hence the security of networks and systems, and especially their availability, are acquiring increasing importance.
Dokazano se veča število napadov na informacijske sisteme – zlasti v okviru organiziranega kriminala, vedno večja pa je tudi zaskrbljenost zaradi morebitnih terorističnih napadov na takšne sisteme, ki so del ključne infrastrukture držav članic.
There is evidence – particularly in the area of organised crime – of attacks on information systems, and growing concern about the possibility of terrorist attacks on systems that are part of the Member States’ critical infrastructure.
Cilj vzpostavitve varne informacijske družbe in območja svobode, varnosti in pravice je s tem ogrožen, zaradi česar so potrebni protiukrepi na ravni EU.
The aim of expanding a safe information society and an area of freedom, security and law is jeopardised by this, calling for countermeasures at EU level.
Zaradi čezmejne narave modernih informacijskih sistemov imajo tudi napadi na takšne sisteme pogosto čezmejno razsežnost, kar še bolj izpostavlja nujnost nadaljnjih ukrepov za približevanje zadevnih kazenskopravnih predpisov.
The cross-regional and cross-border nature of modern information systems means that attacks on such systems often take on a cross-border dimension, underlining the urgent need for further measures to approximate the relevant provisions of criminal law.
Zaradi vedno večjega pomena varnostnih raziskav je Komisija predlagala, da se letni proračun od leta 2007 naprej krepko zviša, s 15 milijonov EUR na okoli 250 milijonov EUR letno.
In view of the increasing significance of security research the Commission has proposed substantially raising the annual budget from 2007 onward from €15 million to around €250 million a year.
Kot priprava na novo finančno obdobje od leta 2007 je bil aprila 2005 ustanovljen evropski svetovalni odbor za varnostne raziskave, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki zasebnih in javnih interesnih skupin in ki svetuje Komisiji glede vsebine in izvedbe varnostnih raziskav v okviru 7. okvirnega raziskovalnega programa.
In preparation for the new financial period from 2007, a European Security Research Advisory Board, composed of representatives of private and public interest groups in the security area, was set up in April 2005 to advise the Commission on the content and implementation of security research under the Seventh Framework Programme.
Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Prejeti odgovori na Zeleno knjigo so jasno izpostavili potencialno dodano vrednost okvira Skupnosti glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture.
The responses received to the Green Paper made clear the potential added value of a Community framework concerning critical infrastructure protection.
V skladu s tem pristopom je treba upoštevati človeške, tehnološke grožnje in naravne nesreče v postopku varovanja ključne infrastrukture, grožnja terorizma pa mora biti na prvem mestu .
Under this approach, manmade, technological threats and natural disasters should be taken into account in the critical infrastructure protection process , but the threat of terrorism should be given priority.
V skladu s tem pristopom je treba upoštevati človeške, tehnološke grožnje in naravne nesreče v postopku varovanja ključne infrastrukture, grožnja terorizma pa mora biti na prvem mestu.
Under this approach, manmade, technological threats and natural disasters should be taken into account in the critical infrastructure protection process.
EU bi morala na tem področju prevzeti usklajevalno vlogo, saj je učinkovitost nacionalnih ukrepov v številnih primerih odvisna od čezmejnega sodelovanja.
The EU should, however, take on a coordinating role in this area given that the effectiveness of national measures depends in many cases on cross-border cooperation.
(5) V Skupnosti obstaja določeno število ključnih infrastruktur, katerih okvara ali uničenje bi vplivala na dve ali več držav članic ali na državo članico , v kateri se takšna infrastruktura ne nahaja.
(5) There are a certain number of critical infrastructures in the Community, the disruption or destruction of which would affect two or more Member States or a Member State other than that in which the critical infrastructure is located.
(5) V Skupnosti obstaja določeno število ključnih infrastruktur, katerih okvara ali uničenje bi vplivala na tri ali več držav članic ali na vsaj dve državi članici , v katerih se takšna infrastruktura ne nahaja.
(5) There are a certain number of critical infrastructures in the Community, the disruption or destruction of which would affect three or more Member States or at least two Member States other than that in which the critical infrastructure is located.
Potrebo za izboljšanje varovanja takšnih evropskih ključnih infrastruktur je treba oceniti v skladu s skupnim okvirom.
The need to improve the protection of such European critical infrastructures should be assessed under a common framework.
Potrebno je oblikovanje sektorskih meril za ugotavljanje in določanje ključne infrastrukture ter skupnega seznama sektorjev ključne infrastrukture, da se olajša izvajanje pristopa za varovanje evropske ključne infrastrukture po posameznih sektorjih.
The establishment of sector-specific crite ria to ascertain and identify critical infrastructure and a common list of critical infrastructure sectors is necessary in order to facilitate the implementation of the sector-by-sector approach to European critical infrastructure protection.
Zahtevo po vzpostavitvi in posodobitvi varnostnega načrta upravljavca je treba obravnavati kot izpolnjeno, če so bili upoštevani obstoječi sektorski varnostni ukrepi.
Compliance with existing sector-based protection measures should be regarded as satisfying the requirement to establish and update an Operator Security Plan.
Pristop Skupnosti bi moral biti – ob upoštevanju sektorskih značilnosti – oblikovan na podlagi obstoječih sektorskih varnostnih ukrepov.
The Community approach should be built on existing sector-based protection measures, taking into account sector characteristics.
Za vsako ceno bi se bilo treba izogniti navzkrižjem ali podvajanjem.
Contradictions or duplications should be avoided at all costs.
(8) Vsak lastnik/upravljavec evropske ključne infrastrukture mora imenovati varnostnega uradnika za zvezo, da se olajša sodelovanje in komunikacija med nacionalnimi organi in organi Skupnosti, pristojnimi za varovanje ključne infrastrukture.
(8) Each owner/operator of European critical infrastructure should designate a Security Liaison Officer in order to facilitate cooperation and communication with relevant national and Community critical infrastructure protection authorities.
Zahtevo po imenovanju varnostnega uradnika za zvezo je treba obravnavati kot izpolnjeno, če so bili upoštevani obstoječi sektorski varnostni ukrepi.
Compliance with existing sector-based protection measures should be regarded as satisfying the requirement to designate a Security Liaison Officer.
(10) Da se olajša izboljšanje varovanja evropskih ključnih infrastruktur, je treba razviti skupne metodologije za ugotavljanje in razvrščanje šibkih točk , groženj in tveganj za infrastrukturne zmogljivosti.
(10) In order to facilitate improvements in the protection of European critical infrastructures, common methodologies should be developed for the identification and classification of vulnerabilities , threats and risks to infrastructure assets.
(10) Da se olajša izboljšanje varovanja evropskih ključnih infrastruktur, je treba razviti in izvajati skupne metodologije za ugotavljanje in razvrščanje groženj in tveganj ter strukturnih šibkih točk za infrastrukturne zmogljivosti.
(10) In order to facilitate improvements in the protection of European critical infrastructures, common methodologies should be developed and implemented for the identification and classification of threats and risks and structural vulnerabilities affecting infrastructure assets.
(11) Samo skupni okvir lahko zagotovi potrebno podlago za usklajeno izvajanje ukrepov za varovanje evropske ključne infrastrukture in jasno določi odgovornosti vseh zadevnih zainteresiranih strani.
(11) Only a common framework can provide the necessary basis for a coherent implementation of measures to protect European critical infrastructure and clearly define the respective responsibilities of all relevant stakeholders.
Lastnikom/upravljavcem evropske ključne infrastrukture mora biti omogočen dostop do najboljših praks in metodologij glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture.
Owners/operators of European critical infrastructure should be given access to best practices and methodologies concerning critical infrastructure protection.
(11) Z določitvijo odgovornosti vseh zadevnih zainteresiranih strani lahko skupni okvir zagotovi potrebno podlago za usklajeno izvajanje ukrepov za varovanje evropske ključne infrastrukture.
(11) By defining the respective responsibilities of all relevant stakeholders a common framework can provide the necessary basis for a coherent implementation of measures to protect European critical infrastructure and clearly define the respective responsibilities of all relevant stakeholders.
Lastnikom/upravljavcem evropske ključne infrastrukture mora biti omogočen dostop do informacij in do izmenjave najboljših izkušenj , praks in metodologij glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture.
Owners/operators of European critical infrastructure should be given access to information and the exchanges of proven experience, practices and methodologies concerning critical infrastructure protection.
(12) Učinkovita zaščita ključne infrastrukture zahteva komunikacijo, usklajevanje in sodelovanje na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti.
(12) Effective protection of critical infrastructure requires communication, coordination, and cooperation at national and Community level.
To se najlažje doseže z imenovanjem kontaktnih točk za varovanje ključne infrastrukture v vsaki državi članici , ki morajo uskladiti vprašanja glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture znotraj države, kot tudi z drugimi državami članicami in Komisijo .
This is best achieved through the nomination of CIP Contact Points in each Member State , who should coordinate CIP issues internally, as well as with other Member States and the Commission .
(12) Učinkovita zaščita evropske ključne infrastrukture zahteva komunikacijo, usklajevanje in sodelovanje na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti.
(12) Effective protection of European critical infrastructure requires communication, coordination, and cooperation at national and Community level.
To se najlažje doseže z imenovanjem kontaktnih točk na nacionalni ravni in ravni Skupnosti za varovanje ključne infrastrukture v vsaki državi članici, ki morajo uskladiti vprašanja glede varovanja ključne infrastrukture znotraj države, kot tudi z drugimi državami članicami in EU .
This is best achieved through the nomination of ECIP Contact Points at national and Community levels , who should coordinate ECIP issues internally, as well as with other Member States and the EU .
Upoštevanje načela subsidiarnosti.
Consideration of the principle of subsidiarity.
Če so mehanizmi Skupnosti že vzpostavljeni, bi se morali še naprej uporabljati in pomagati pri splošnem izvajanju te direktive, ne da bi pri tem nastali dodatni stroški zaradi ponovljenih zahtevkov, varnost pa se ne bi izboljšala.
Where Community mechanisms are already in place, they should continue to be used and will contribute to the overall implementation of this Directive whilst ensuring that extra costs are not incurred as a result of multiple claims without an increase in security .
Prihodnji sektorski ukrepi bi morali upoštevati to direktivo zaradi preprečevanja možnega podvajanja ali navzkrižja.
Future sectoral measures should take account of this Directive in order to avoid possible duplication or contradiction .
(15a) Ta direktiva ne upošteva posebnega pomena „zunanje razsežnosti“ ključnih infrastruktur, na primer v finančnem sektorju ali na energetskem področju.
(15a) This Directive does not take account of the special significance of the ‘external dimension’ of critical infrastructures, such as in the financial sector or the energy industry.
Predlog spremembe ponazarja, da lahko imajo ključne infrastrukture tudi zunaj Evropske unije znaten vpliv, zlasti na finančnem in energetskem področju, potrebni pa so ukrepi za izboljšanje varnosti.
To make clear that critical infrastructures outside the European Union can also have enormous effects, particularly in the finance and energy sectors, and action is needed to increase security.
(17) Ker države članice v vseh primerih ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči ciljev te direktive, in sicer vzpostaviti postopek za ugotavljanje in določanje evropskih ključnih infrastruktur in oblikovati skupni pristop za oceno potreb za izboljšanje varovanja takšnih infrastruktur, ter se jih zaradi obsega in učinkov lažje doseže na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
(17) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely the creation of a procedure for the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructures, and a common approach to the assessment of the needs to improve the protection of such infrastructures, cannot in all cases be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Prvotni zapis odstavka je premočan.
Wording of original paragraph is too strong.
Člen 2, točka (c), alineji 1 in 2
Article 2, point (c), bullets 1 and 2
• vpliv na prebivalstvo;
• effect on the population;
Potrebna opredelitev.
Necessary clarification.
(d) „ strukturna šibka točka“ pomeni značilnost elementa konstrukcije ključne infrastrukture, njenega izvajanja ali delovanja, zaradi katerega je dovzetna za okvaro ali uničenje zaradi grožnje in vključuje odvisnosti od drugih vrst infrastrukture.
d) “ structural vulnerability” means a characteristic of an element of the critical infrastructure's design, implementation, or operation that renders it susceptible to disruption or destruction by a threat and includes dependencies on other types of infrastructure;
(Sprememba velja za obravnavano besedilo v celoti.
(This amendment applies throughout the text.