natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Z njegovo uvedbo upravljanje sardona ne bo več predmet vsakoletnih decembrskih političnih pogajanj, ampak bo mogoče dosegati dolgoročne cilje pri upravljanju evropskih virov, hkrati pa zagotoviti njihovo trajnost in največji donos, kar je v skladu z Uredbo št. 2371/2002.
The introduction of this plan will make it possible to remove the management of anchovy from the political negotiation in December of each year, placing it on course to achieve the objectives for the management of European resources in the long term, thereby guaranteeing sustainability and maximum yield as laid down in Regulation 2371/2002.
Postopek izdelave predlaganega načrta upravljanja je bil uspešen: bil je pregleden in je omogočal široko udeležbo ter sodelovanje med ribiči in zainteresiranimi stranmi (prek Regionalnega svetovalnega sveta za jugozahodne vode), znanstveniki in predstavniki Komisije, ki so razpravljali o najboljšem načinu izkoriščanja tega vira.
The process of drawing up the proposed management plan was a positive one: it was transparent and participative, allowing for interaction between fishermen and stakeholders (through the South Western Waters Regional Advisory Council (South RAC)), scientists and Commission representatives in discussing the best way of exploiting the resource.
Vsem se je prisluhnilo in vsi pogledi ali stališča so bili jasno predstavljeni.
Everyone was heard and the various ideas and standpoints were clearly expressed.
V tem interaktivnem postopku se je na različne načine obogatila opredelitev pravil o izkoriščanju, ki so se ocenjevala.
This interactive process enriched the definition of the rules on exploitation under review in various ways.
Vsebina predloga in poročila
Content of the proposal and report
Predlog temelji na obsežnih raziskavah Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvo (STECF) v zvezi z oblikami izkoriščanja vira glede na cilje upravljanja in v skladu s trenutnim znanstvenim spremljanjem vira.
The proposal is based on wide-ranging studies by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STEFC) on ways of exploiting the resource in relation to the management objectives and in line with current scientific monitoring of the resource.
Leta 2008 sta bili dve srečanji, namenjeni oceni različnih možnosti izkoriščanja vira, ki sta se uspešno končali z dodatnimi raziskavami v letu 2009.
Two meetings were held in 2008 to evaluate various options for the exploitation of the resource, culminating in additional studies in 2009.
Pravilo o izkoriščanju določa TAC (ali dovoljeno raven ulova) za vsako leto ribolova (od julija do junija prihodnjega leta), takoj po oceni staleža glede na ribolovno sezono maja vsako leto, torej se informacija uporabi takoj.
The exploitation rule defines the TAC (or allowable catch level) in the fishery for each year (from July to June of the following year), immediately after the assessment of the stock in line with the fishing seasons in May of each year, thus immediately making maximum use of this information.
Vključuje dejavnike omejitve TAC na najvišjo (33.000 t) ali najnižjo (7000 t) kvoto, ki jo deloma predlagajo sami ribiči in katere prednosti za gospodarsko učinkovitost ribištva so dokazane.
It incorporates elements of the TAC restrictions in a maximum (33 000 t) or a minimum (7 000 t) quota, some of which were proposed by fishermen themselves and which have been shown to offer benefits for economic conditions in the fishery.
Osnutek poročila uvaja pravilo o izkoriščanju, ki maksimira ulov ob upoštevanju previdnostnega načela, v skladu s predlogom, ki ga podpira Regionalni svetovalni svet za jugozahodne vode in pri katerem raven tveganja nekoliko presega 10 % (v nasprotju s predlogom Komisije, ki določa 25 % zmanjšanje glede na TAC in kvote, ki veljajo za predhodno ribolovno sezono).
The draft report introduces an exploitation rule that will maximise catches, based on precautionary principles, in line with the proposal supported by the South RAC, with a risk level slightly over 10% (in contrast to the Commission proposal, which envisages a 25% reduction by comparison with the TAC and quotas applicable in the previous fishing season).
Gospodarska učinkovitost pravila o izkoriščanju iz poročila je blizu najvišji ravni, ki jo je še mogoče pričakovati pri tem ribolovu.
The economic efficiency of the exploitation rule proposed in the report is close to the maximum economic levels which can be expected for this fishery.
Udeležba sektorja
Participation of the sector
Ribiške zveze, ki so vključene v ribolov na sardona v Biskajskem zalivu na območju VIII, regionalni svetovalni svet in predstavniki oceanografskih inštitutov, ki so sodelovali pri izdelavi predloga, so bili povabljeni na sejo Odbora za ribištvo, ki je bila 1. oktobra 2009.
The fishermen's federations affected by the anchovy fishery in the Bay of Biscay, zone VIII, the RAC and representatives of the oceanographical institutes that played a part in drawing up the proposal were invited to the meeting of the Committee on Fisheries on 1 October 2009.
Tako so imele različne parlamentarne skupine možnost poslušati njihovo mnenje in pripombe na predlog Komisije.
This gave the various parliamentary groups an opportunity to hear their points of view and comments on the Commission proposal.
V predlogu poročila se odražajo mnenja sektorja.
The draft report reflects the sector's positions.
Členi v zvezi s poglavjem IV Spremljanje, inšpekcijski pregledi in nadzor (členi 8 do 22)
Articles relating to Chapter IV, Monitoring, Inspection and Surveillance (Articles 8 to 22)
Svet je uredbo o dolgoročnem načrtu za sardona odobril konec julija.
The Council approved the regulation on the long-term plan for anchovy at the end of July.
V skladu s pravili Parlamenta se bo dokument obravnaval na decembrskem plenarnem zasedanju.
In accordance with parliamentary rules, the document will be dealt with in plenary at the December part-session.
Dokument vsebuje 25 členov.
The document contains 25 articles.
Poglavje, ki je posvečeno spremljanju, inšpekcijskim pregledom in nadzoru obsega člene 8 do 22.
The chapter on monitoring, inspection and surveillance comprises Articles 8 to 22.
Pri preučitvi načrta je poročevalka izvedela, da Svet pripravlja novo uredbo o nadzoru (o kateri je Parlament podal svoje mnenje v svoji prejšnji mandatni dobi), ki jo želi odobriti sredi oktobra in ki neposredno vpliva na člene 8 do 22 načrta za ribolov na sardona.
While examining the plan, your rapporteur became aware that the Council was working on the new control regulation (on which Parliament delivered an opinion in the previous parliamentary term), which it intends to approve in mid-October and which will have a direct impact on Articles 8 to 22 of the plan for the anchovy fishery.
Na novembrskem zasedanju bo Odbor za ribištvo razpravljal o načrtu za sardona, katerega členi bodo verjetno z novo uredbo Sveta že spremenjeni.
At the November part-session the Committee on Fisheries will be debating an anchovy plan whose articles will probably have already been modified by the new Council regulation.
Da bi razčistila to situacijo, preprečila protislovja, ponudila poslancem popolne informacije ter v to delo v čim večji meri vključila vidike sektorja, se je poročevalka sestala z odgovornimi osebami pri Evropski komisiji.
In order to clarify the situation, avoid contradictions, provide full information to Members and integrate the sector's perspective as far as possible, your rapporteur held a meeting with those responsible in the Commission.
Po tem srečanju lahko poročevalka samo navede, da bodo spremenjeni členi 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 in 18.
Following this contact, your rapporteur can state only that Articles 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 18 will be affected.
Nekateri se bodo ohranili, drugi bodo preneseni v uredbo o splošnem nazoru, ki jo namerava Svet sprejeti še ta mesec, spet drugi bodo spremenjeni.
Some will be upheld, others will be transferred to the general control regulation that the Council intends to adopt this month, and others will be modified.
Poročevalka bi rada opozorila na ta nenavaden položaj, ki ga je poskušala razčistiti.
Your rapporteur would draw attention to this strange situation, which she has sought to clarify.
Brez kakršnega koli dokumenta Sveta ne more zagotoviti več informacij.
In the absence of any kind of document from the Council, it is impossible to provide more information.
Zdi se, da to ni najprimernejši postopek, vendar je situacija zdaj takšna.
This does not appear to be the most appropriate way of proceeding, but this is the situation with which we are faced.
Kljub temu je poročevalka predlagala nekaj sprememb besedila členov v tem osnutku poročila.
In spite of this situation, your rapporteur has proposed a number of amendments to these articles in the draft report.
Lahko pa se zgodi, da bo treba zaradi uskladitve obeh besedil v ustreznem trenutku predložiti nove predloge sprememb.
However, it is possible that fresh amendments will have to be tabled at the appropriate time in order to harmonise the two texts.
o osnutku Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Moldavijo na drugi strani o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Republiko Moldavijo o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Republike Moldavije v programih Unije
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Moldova in Union programmes
(Posebni zakonodajni postopek – odobritev)
(Special legislative procedure – consent)
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta (10496/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (10496/2010),
– ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki vzpostavlja partnerstvo med Evropskima skupnostma in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Moldavijo na drugi strani, ki je bil sklenjen 28. novembra 1994
– having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, concluded on 28 November 1994
UL L 181, 24.6.1998, str.
OJ L 181, 24.6.1998, p.
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členi 114, 168, 169, 172, 173(3), 188, 192 ter točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6), členom 218(7) in drugim pododstavkom člena 218(8) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (C7-0000/2010),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council pursuant to Articles 114, 168, 169, 172, 173(3), 188, 192 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), Article 218(7) and the second subparagraph of Article 218(8) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0000/2010),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0300/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0300/2010 ),
Sporazum o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Moldavijo in Evropskima Skupnostma je bil sklenjen 28. novembra 1994, Moldavija pa je od leta 2004 vključena v evropsko sosedsko politiko (ESP).
The Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between Moldova and the European Communities was concluded on 28 November 1994 and since 2004 Moldova has been included in the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP).
Svet je 5. marca 2007
On 5 March 2007
Sklepi Sveta za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose (General Affairs and External Relations Council – GAERC) z dne 5. marca 2007. potrdil pristop, očrtan v sporočilu Komisije „o splošnem pristopu, s katerim se partnerskim državam evropske sosedske politike omogoči sodelovanje v agencijah Skupnosti ter v programih Skupnosti”
GAERC Conclusions of 5 March 2007. the Council endorsed the approach outlined in the Commission Communication “on the general approach to enable ENP partner countries to participate in Community agencies and Community programmes”
KOM(2006) 724 konč. z dne 4. decembra 2006. .
COM (2006) 724 final of 4 December 2006. .
To sporočilo predvideva možnost za države ESP, da sodelujejo v izbranih programih Skupnosti in agencijah kot ukrep za spodbujanje prenove, posodobitve in prehoda.
This communication envisages the possibility for the ENP countries to participate in selected Community programmes and agencies as a measure to promote reform, modernisation and transition.
Obravnavani osnutek priporočila se ukvarja s sodelovanjem Republike Moldavije v takšnih programih Skupnosti na njeno izrecno zahtevo.
The draft recommendation under consideration deals with the participation to such Community programmes of the Republic of Moldova, following its expressed request.
Svet je 18. junija 2007 Komisiji izdal direktive za pogajanja o okvirnih sporazumih glede splošnih načel za sodelovanje v programih Skupnosti s trinajstimi državami iz soseščine.
On 18 June 2007, the Council issued directives for the Commission to negotiate Framework Agreements on the general principles for the participation of Community programmes with thirteen Neighbourhood countries.
Pogajanja z Republiko Moldavijo so se začela marca 2008.
The negotiations with the Republic of Moldova began in March 2008.
Protokol vsebuje okvirni sporazum o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Republike Moldavije v programih Skupnosti in agencijah ter vključuje standardne določbe, vsebovane v takšnih protokolih za države ESP.
The Protocol contains a Framework Agreement on the general principles for participation of Republic of Moldova in Community programmes and Agencies and includes the standard provisions contained in such protocols for ENP countries.
Zaradi tega mora biti za sodelovanje v posameznem programu osnovan memorandum o soglasju, ki ga morata podpisati obe strani.
Therefore the participation in each programme requires the drafting of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to be signed by both parties.
Zraven tega se sodelovanje držav ESP ne nanaša na vse programe Skupnosti, saj njihovi statuti in cilji ne omogočajo vedno takšnega sodelovanja.
Furthermore the participation of ENP countries does not concern all Community programmes, since their statutes and objectives do not always allow for such participation.
Obstajajo tri kategorije agencij in programov: odprti za sodelovanje
Three categories of agencies and programmes exist: open to participation
Na primer: EEA, EFSA; Carina 2013, okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost itd. ; tisti, pri katerih je sodelovanje mogoče
For instance: EEA, EFSA; Customs 2013, Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme, etc. ; those for which cooperation is possible
Na primer: EUROFUND, EASA; HERCULE II, Pericles, Marco Polo itd. ; in tisti, pri katerih sodelovanje ni mogoče
For instance: EUROFUND, EASA; HERCULE II, Pericles, Marco Polo, etc ; and those for which no cooperation or participation are possible
Na primer: CEDEFOP, ETF; solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije itd. .
For instance: CEDEFOP, ETF; European Union Solitarity Fund, etc. .
Republika Moldavija bo prispevala finančna sredstva za posebne programe, v katerih sodeluje.
Republic of Moldova shall contribute financially to the specific programmes it participates in.
Finančni vidik se razlikuje od programa do programa, določen pa je v memorandumu o soglasju.
The financial implications vary from programme to programme and are determined in the MoU.
Sklenitev protokola bi Moldaviji ob krepitvi političnih odnosov prek vzhodnega partnerstva in pogajanj o novem pridružitvenem sporazumu omogočila postopno odpiranje določenih programov Skupnosti ali intenzivnejše sodelovanje v njih in tako ponudila priložnost za spodbujanje nadaljnjih kulturnih, izobraževalnih, okoljskih, tehničnih in znanstvenih povezav.
The conclusion of the Protocol would permit the gradual opening of or reinforced participation in certain Community programmes for Moldova, offering an opportunity to promote further cultural, educational, environmental, technical and scientific links, in addition to the reinforcing of the political relations through the Eastern Partnership and the negotiations of the new Association Agreement.
Navsezadnje sta politična stabilnost in demokratični razvoj bistvena za celovito izvajanje protokola in za omogočanje sklepanja potrebnih memorandumov o soglasju.
Finally, political stability and democratic development are essential for the comprehensive implementation of the Protocol and to enable the conclusion of the necessary MoUs.
Zato trenutno ustavno mrtvilo v Moldaviji povzroča skrbi in ga je treba obravnavati hitro in učinkovito.
The current constitutional stalemate in Moldova is therefore a concern that should be addressed promptly and efficiently.
Neuspeh ustavnega referenduma 5. septembra 2010 je vreden obžalovanja, saj bi lahko pomaknil ustavno krizo v ozadje.
The failure of the constitutional referendum on 5 September 2010 is regrettable as it would have provided a respite from the constitutional crisis.
Za Moldavijo je bistveno, da nadaljuje z izvajanjem akcijskega načrta ESP in reform v dokumentu „ Rethink Moldova” (Ponovni premislek o Moldaviji).
It is essential for Moldova to proceed with the implementation of the ENP Action Plan and of the reforms it has set out in the document "Rethink Moldova".
Izvedba volitev, kakor to zahteva ustava, je bistvena za prihodnjo stabilnost in blaginjo Moldavije ter razvoj njenih odnosov z EU.
Holding of elections, as required by the constitution is essential for the future stability and prosperity of Moldova and the development of its relations with the EU.
Vse strani se morajo združiti, da bi poiskale rešitev in odrazile zaupanje Moldavcev v evropsko rešitev.
All parties should unite to find a solution and reflect the confidence of the Moldovan people for a European solution.
EU in Svet Evrope sta zagotovila znatno pomoč, s tem pa morata nadaljevati, da bo mogoče pravočasno izboljšati razmere, ki so zastale na mrtvi točki.
The EU and Council of Europe have provided significant assistance and should continue to do so to overcome this impasse in a timely manner.
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Krzysztofu Lisku
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Krzysztof Lisek
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Krzysztofu Lisku, ki so jo posredovale poljske sodne oblasti dne 5. novembra 2009 in ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 14. decembra 2009,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Krzysztof Lisek, forwarded by the Polish judicial authorities on 5 November 2009 and announced in plenary sitting on 14 December 2009,
– po zagovoru Krzysztofa Liska v skladu s členom 7(3) poslovnika,
– having heard Krzysztof Lisek in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju členov 8 in 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije, ki je priloga k Pogodbam,
– having regard to Articles 8 and 9 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union annexed to the Treaties,
Zadeva 101/63 Wagner proti Fohrmannu in Krieru [1964] ZOdl 195 in zadeva 149/85 Wybot proti Faureju in drugim [1986] ECR 2391. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195, and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and Others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju 151. člena ustave Republike Poljske,
– having regard to Article 151 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0301/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0301/2010 ),
A. ker so zoper Krzysztofa Liska, poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, poljski sodni organi začeli kazenski postopek, in sicer je pred sodiščem v Koszalinu obtožen kaznivih dejanj po členu 296(1) in (3) kazenskega zakonika z dne 6. junija 1997, ki je bil objavljen v listu zakonov iz leta 1997, št. 88, zadeva 553, kakor je bil spremenjen; členu 586 zakona o trgovinskih družbah z dne 15. septembra 2000, ki je bil objavljen v listu zakonov iz leta 2000, št. 94, zadeva 1037, kakor je bil spremenjen; členu 77(1) in (2) zakona o računovodstvu z dne 29. septembra 1994 (prečiščeno besedilo, objavljeno v listu zakonov iz leta 2002, št. 76, zadeva 694, kakor je bil spremenjen),
A. whereas criminal proceedings have been brought against Krzysztof Lisek, Member of the European Parliament, by the Polish judicial authorities, Mr Lisek being accused in the Koszalin Court of criminal offences under Article 296(1) and (3) of the Penal Code of 6 June 1997 published in the Journal of Laws of 1997, No 88, Item 553, as amended; Article 586 of the Commercial Companies Code of 15 September 2000 published in the Journal of Laws of 2000, No 94, Item 1037, as amended; Article 77(1) and (2) of the Accountancy Act of 29 September 1994 (consolidated text published in Journal of Laws 2002, No 76, Item 694), as amended),
B. ker v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije med zasedanji Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države; ker, kadar je poslanec zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja, sklicevanje na imuniteto ni mogoče; in ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu,
B. whereas, according to Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament; whereas immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is caught in the act of committing an offence; and whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
C. ker se obtožnica zoper Krzysztofa Liska ne nanaša na mnenja, ki so bila izražena, ali glasove, ki so bili oddani pri opravljanju njegovih dolžnosti poslanca Evropskega parlamenta,
C. whereas the charges brought against Mr Lisek do not relate to opinions expressed or votes cast in the performance of his duties as a Member of the European Parliament,
D. ker po členu 105 ustave Republike Poljske poslanec nacionalnega parlamenta (sejma) ni kazensko odgovoren brez soglasja parlamenta,
D. whereas, according to the Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, a member of the national Parliament (Sejm) shall not be subject to criminal liability without the consent of the Parliament,
E. ker člen 105 nadalje določa, da poslanec nacionalnega parlamenta ne odgovarja za dejavnosti, ki jih opravlja v okviru poslanskega mandata med trajanjem in po koncu trajanja tega mandata.,
E. whereas Article 105 goes on to provide that a member of the national parliament shall not be liable for activities performed within the scope of a deputy’s mandate during the term thereof nor following expiry thereof,
F. ker je Krzysztof Lisek dejansko obtožen kaznivih dejanj v zvezi z njegovim upravljanjem in računovodskimi dejavnostmi kot predsednik odbora Poljskega združenja za mladinske kartice in družbe Campus Sp. v času pred njegovo izvolitvijo v Evropski parlament; in ker kazniva dejanja, katerih je Krzysztof Lisek obtožen, nimajo nobene zveze z njegovimi dejavnostmi poslanca Evropskega parlamenta,
F. whereas Mr Lisek is essentially charged with offences in relation to his management and accounting activities as chairman of the board of the Polish Youth Card Association and Campus Sp. during a period prior to his election to the European Parliament; and whereas the offences with which Mr Lisek is charged have nothing to do with his activities as a Member of the European Parliament,
G. ker niso bili predloženi trdni dokazi o obstoju fumus persecutionis,
G. whereas no cogent evidence has been adduced as to the existence of any fumus persecutionis ,