natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ashley Fox, Anna Hedh, Constance Le Grip, Emma McClarkin, Morten Messerschmidt, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Wim van de Camp
Ashley Fox, Anna Hedh, Constance Le Grip, Emma McClarkin, Morten Messerschmidt, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Konstantinos Poupakis, Sylvana Rapti, Wim van de Camp
o izvajanju in pregledu Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
on the implementation and review of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
– ob upoštevanju člena 81 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
1. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „Uredba Bruselj I“ ali „Uredba“),
1. (hereinafter ‘the Brussels I Regulation’ or ‘the Regulation’),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o uporabi Uredbe ( KOM(2009)0174 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s report on the application of that regulation ( COM(2009)0174 ),
– ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije z dne 21. aprila 2009 o pregledu izvajanja Uredbe Bruselj I ( KOM(2009)0175 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Green Paper of 21 April 2009 on the review of the Brussels I Regulation ( COM(2009)0175 ),
– ob upoštevanju heidelberškega poročila (JLS/2004/C4/03) o uporabi Uredbe Bruselj I v državah članicah in odzivih na zeleno knjigo Komisije,
– having regard to the Heidelberg Report (JLS/2004/C4/03) on the application of the Brussels I Regulation in the Member States and the responses to the Commission’s Green Paper,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2009 o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu – območje svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane – Stockholmski program
– having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2009 on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen – Stockholm programme
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0090 . , natančneje poglavij Večji dostop do civilnega pravosodja za državljane in podjetja in Oblikovanje evropske pravosodne kulture,
Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2009)0090 . , specifically the sections ‘Greater access to civil justice for citizens and business’ and ‘Building a European judicial culture’,
– ob upoštevanju pristopa Unije k Haaški konferenci o zasebnem mednarodnem pravu z dne 3. aprila 2007,
– having regard to the Union’s accession to the Hague Conference on private international law on 3 April 2007,
– ob upoštevanju podpisa Haaške konvencije v imenu Evropske unije z dne 30. junija 2005 o izbiri sodišča z dne 1. aprila 2009,
– having regard to the signature, on behalf of the Union, of the Hague Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements on 1 April 2009,
– ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča, zlasti zadev Gambazzi proti DaimlerChrysler Canada
– having regard to the case law of the Court of Justice, in particular Gambazzi v. DaimlerChrysler Canada
Zadeva C-394/07 Gambazzi proti DaimlerChrysler Canada ZOdl.
Case C-394/07 Gambazzi v. DaimlerChrysler Canada [2009] ECR I-2563 , the Lugano opinion
Zadeva C-185/07 Allianz SpA proti West Tankers Inc.
Case C-185/07 Allianz SpA v. West Tankers Inc .
ZOdl 2009, I-663 , Gasser proti MISAT
[2009] ECR I-663 , Gasser v. MISAT
Zadeva C-185/07, Gasser GmbH proti MISAT Srl [2003], ZOdl I-14693. , Owusu proti Jackson
Case C-185/07 Gasser GmbH v. MISAT Srl [2003] ECR I-14693. , Owusu v. Jackson
Zadeva C-281/02 Owusu proti Jackson, ZOdl 2005, I-1383. , Shevill
Case C-281/02 Owusu v. Jackson [2005] ECR I-1383. , Shevill
Zadeva C-129/92 Owens Bank Ltd proti Fulvio Bracco in Bracco Industria Chimica SpA, ZOdl 1994, I-117. , Denilauer
Case C-129/92 Owens Bank Ltd v Fulvio Bracco and Bracco Industria Chimica SpA [1994] ECR I-117. , Denilauer
Zadeva 125/79 Denilauer proti Couchet Frères, ZOdl 1980, 1553. , St Paul Dairy Industries
Case 125/79 Denilauer v. Couchet Frères [1980] ECR 1553. , St Paul Dairy Industries
Zadeva C-104/03 St Paul Dairy Industries proti Unibel, ZOdl 2005, I-3481. in Van Uden
Case C-104/03 St Paul Dairy Industries v. Unibel [2005] ECR I-3481. and Van Uden
Zadeva C-391/95 Van Uden proti Deco-Line ZOdl.
Case C-391/95 Van Uden v. Deco-Line [1998] ECR I-7091. ;
Prečiščeno besedilo iz UL C 27, 26.1.1998, str.
Consolidated version in OJ, C 27 , 26.1.1998, p.
1. , Uredbe (ES) št. 805/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov
1. , Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
15. , Uredbe (ES) št. 1896/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o uvedbi postopka za evropski plačilni nalog
15. , Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure
UL L 399, 30.12.2006, str.
OJ L 399, 30.12.2006, p.
1. , Uredbe (ES) št. 861/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti
1, , Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure
1. , Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 4/2009 z dne 18. decembra 2008 o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb ter sodelovanju v preživninskih zadevah
1. , Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations
UL L 7, 10.1.2009, str.
OJ L 7, 10.1.2009, p.
1. in Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 z dne 27. novembra 2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1347/2000
1. and Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 864/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti (Rim II)
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II)
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 16. decembra 2009,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16 December 2009,
– ob upoštevanju člena 48 in 119(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 48 and 119(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0219/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7‑0219/2010 ),
A. ker šteje Uredba št. 44/2001 skupaj s svojo predhodnico Bruseljsko konvencijo za enega najuspešnejših delov zakonodaje EU; ker je postavila temelje za evropsko pravosodno območje in zadovoljevala potrebe državljanov in podjetij, saj z enotnimi evropskimi pravili pospešuje pravno varnost in predvidljivost odločitev, k čemur je prispevala obsežna sodna praksa, hkrati pa omogoča izogibanje vzporednim postopkom, zato se uporablja kot referenca in kot orodje za druge instrumente,
A. whereas Regulation No 44/2001, with its predecessor the Brussels Convention, is one of the most successful pieces of EU legislation; whereas it laid the foundations for a European judicial area, has served citizens and business well by promoting legal certainty and predictability of decisions through uniform European rules – supplemented by a substantial body of case-law,– and avoiding parallel proceedings, and is used as a reference and a tool for other instruments,
B. ker je bila kljub temu po nekaterih sodbah Sodišča kritizirana in bi jo bilo treba posodobiti,
B. whereas, notwithstanding this, it has been criticised following a number of rulings of the Court of Justice and is in need of modernisation,
C. ker bi odprava postopka eksekvature – glavni cilj Komisije – pospešila prosti pretok sodnih odločb in bila temelj za izgradnjo evropskega pravosodnega prostora,
C. whereas abolition of exequatur – the Commission’s main objective – would expedite the free movement of judicial decisions and form a key milestone in the building of a European judicial area,
D. ker se eksekvatura redko zavrne: pravna sredstva se vložijo le zoper 1 do 5 % vlog in so le redkokdaj uspešna; ker je na enotnem trgu težko upravičiti izgubo časa in stroške, ki so povezani s priznavanjem tuje sodbe, še zlasti neprijetno pa je, ko si tožnik prizadeva za izvršbo na premoženje dolžnika po sodbi na več pristojnih sodiščih,
D. whereas exequatur is seldom refused: only 1 to 5% of applications are appealed and those appeals are rarely successful; whereas, nonetheless, the time and expense of getting a foreign judgment recognised are hard to justify in the single market and this may be particularly vexatious where a claimant wishes to seek enforcement against a judgment debtor’s assets in several jurisdictions,
E. ker v več instrumentih EU ni zahteve po eksekvaturi: uredba o evropskem nalogu za izvršbo, uredba o evropskem plačilnem nalogu, uredba o evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti in uredba o preživninskih obveznostih
E. whereas there is no requirement for exequatur in several EU instruments: the European enforcement order, the European payment order, the European small claims procedure and the maintenance obligations regulation
Glej uvodno izjavo 9 v preambuli. ,
See the 9th recital in the preamble. ,
F. ker bi bilo treba odpravo eksekvature izpeljati pod pogojem, da je sodna odločba, ki je ustrezna, da se jo prizna in izvrši v skladu z Uredbo in je izvršljiva v državi članici, v kateri je bila izdana, izvršljiva v vsej EU; to mora spremljati izredni postopek, ki je na voljo stranki, zoper katero se zahteva izvršba, da bi ji zagotovili ustrezno pravico do ugovora na sodiščih države izvršbe, če bi ta stranka želela izpodbijati izvršbo iz razlogov iz te uredbe; ker bo treba zagotoviti, da ukrepi za izvršbo, ki so bili sprejeti pred potekom časovnega roka za vložitev zahtevka za preverjanje, ne bodo nepopravljivi,
F. whereas abolition of exequatur should be effected by providing that a judicial decision qualifying for recognition and enforcement under the Regulation which is enforceable in the Member State in which it was given is enforceable throughout the EU; whereas this should be coupled with an exceptional procedure available to the party against whom enforcement is sought so as to guarantee an adequate right of recourse to the courts of the State of enforcement in the event that that party wishes to contest enforcement on the grounds set out in the Regulation; whereas it will be necessary to ensure that steps taken for enforcement before the expiry of the time-limit for applying for review are not irreversible,
G. ker je treba ohraniti minimalne zaščitne ukrepe iz Uredbe št. 44/2001 ,
G. whereas the minimum safeguards provided for in Regulation No 44/2001 must be maintained,
H. ker morajo biti uradniki in rubežniki v državi članici prejemnici sposobni prepoznati, ali je dokument, na podlagi katerega se zahteva izvršba, verodostojna, pravnomočna sodba nacionalnega sodišča,
H. whereas officials and bailiffs in the receiving Member State must be able to tell that the document of which enforcement is sought is an authentic, final judgment from a national court,
I. ker arbitražo zadovoljivo obravnavata Newyorška konvencija iz leta 1958 in Ženevska konvencija o mednarodni trgovinski arbitraži iz leta 1961, ki so ju podpisale vse države članice, zato je treba ohraniti izločitev arbitraže iz področja uporabe Uredbe,
I. whereas arbitration is satisfactorily dealt with by the 1958 New York Convention and the 1961 Geneva Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, to which all Member States are parties, and the exclusion of arbitration from the scope of the Regulation must remain in place,
J. ker so določbe newyorške konvencije minimalni standardi in je pravo države pogodbenice lahko bolj naklonjeno arbitražni pristojnosti in arbitražam,
J. whereas the rules of the New York Convention are minimum rules and the law of the Contracting States may be more favourable to arbitral competence and arbitration awards,
K. ker bi poleg tega določba, ki določa, da bi sodišča države članice, v kateri je sedež arbitraže, morala biti izključno pristojna, lahko povzročila znatne motnje,
K. whereas, moreover, a rule providing that the courts of the Member State of the seat of the arbitration should have exclusive jurisdiction could give rise to considerable perturbations,
L. ker se zaradi intenzivne debate, ki jo je sprožil predlog vzpostavitve izključne sodne pristojnosti civilnih sodišč držav članic za sodne postopke, ki podpirajo arbitražo, zdi, da države članice niso dosegle skupnega stališča o tem vprašanju in da bi bilo ob upoštevanju svetovne konkurence na tem področju vsako siljenje škodljivo,
L. whereas it appears from the intense debate raised by the proposal to create an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States that the Member States have not reached a common position thereon and that it would be counterproductive, having regard to world competition in this area, to try to force their hand,
M. ker morajo biti različni nacionalni postopkovni mehanizmi, ki varujejo arbitražno pristojnost (prepoved začetka postopka v isti zadevi pred drugim sodiščem, če je v skladu s prostim gibanjem ljudi in temeljnimi pravicami, izjava o veljavnosti arbitražne klavzule, odškodnina v primeru kršitve arbitražne klavzule, negativni učinek načela Kompetenz-Kompetenz itd.) še vedno na razpolago in morajo biti učinki teh postopkov in iz njih izhajajočih sodnih odločb iz drugih držav članic prepuščeni pravu teh držav članic, kakor je bilo stališče pred sodbo v zadevi West Tankers,
M. whereas the various national procedural devices developed to protect arbitral jurisdiction (anti-suit injunctions so long as they are in conformity with free movement of persons and fundamental rights, declaration of validity of an arbitration clause, grant of damages for breach of an arbitration clause, the negative effect of the ' Kompetenz-Kompetenz principle', etc. ) must continue to be available and the effect of such procedures and the ensuing court decisions in the other Member States must be left to the law of those Member States as was the position prior to the judgment in West Tankers ,
N. ker je avtonomija stranke ključnega pomena, uporaba pravila o litispendenci, kot jo je potrdilo Sodišče (npr. v zadevi Gasser), pa omogoča spodkopavanje določb o izbiri sodišča z neprimernimi ukrepi (t.i. „torpedo actions“),
N. whereas party autonomy is of key importance and the application of the lis pendens rule as endorsed by the Court of Justice ( e.g. in Gasser ) enables choice-of-court clauses to be undermined by abusive ‘torpedo’ actions,
O. ker lahko tretje strani zavezuje sporazum o izbiri sodišča (denimo iz nakladnice), na katerega niso izrecno pristale, kar lahko škoduje njihovi pravici do sodnega varstva in je lahko očitno nepravično in ker je zato treba učinek sporazuma o izbiri sodišča na tretje strani obravnavati v posebni določbi uredbe,
O. whereas third parties may be bound by a choice-of-court agreement (for instance in a bill of lading) to which they have not specifically assented and this may adversely affect their access to justice and be manifestly unfair and whereas, therefore, the effect of choice-of-court agreements in respect of third parties needs to be dealt with in a specific provision of the Regulation ,
P. ker vsebuje zelena knjiga nasvet, da bi lahko mnoge težave v zvezi z Uredbo ublažili z boljšo komunikacijo med sodišči; ker bi bilo skoraj nemogoče sprejemati zakonodajo o boljši komunikaciji med sodniki v okviru instrumenta mednarodnega zasebnega prava, lahko pa bi jo spodbujali prek oblikovanja programa evropske pravosodne kulture z usposabljanjem in uporabo mrež (Evropska mreža za usposabljanje sodstva, Evropska mreža svetov za pravosodje, Mreža predsednikov vrhovnih sodišč Evropske unije, Evropska pravosodna mreža v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah),
P. whereas the Green Paper suggests that many problems encountered with the Regulation could be alleviated by improved communications between courts; whereas it would be virtually impossible to legislate on better communication between judges in a private international law instrument, but it can be promoted as part of the creation of a European judicial culture though training and recourse to networks (European Judicial Training Network, European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, Network of the Presidents of the Supreme Courts of the EU, European Judicial Network in Civil and Commercial Matters),
Q. ker obstaja v zvezi z osebnostnimi pravicami potreba po omejitvi možnosti izbire najugodnejšega sodišča s poudarjanjem, da smejo sodišča načeloma sprejeti pristojnost le, kadar obstaja zadostna, bistvena ali pomembna povezava z državo, v kateri je vložena tožba, saj bi s tem dosegli boljše ravnovesje med različnimi interesi, zlasti med svobodo izražanja ter pravico do dobrega imena in zasebnega življenja; ker bo problem o pravu, ki se uporablja, obravnavan posebej v zakonodajni pobudi glede Uredbe Rim II; ker bi bilo treba v spremenjeno uredbo vseeno vključiti nekaj napotkov za nacionalna sodišča,
Q. whereas, as regards rights of the personality, there is a need to restrict the possibility for forum shopping by emphasising that, in principle, courts should accept jurisdiction only where a sufficient, substantial or significant link exists with the country in which the action is brought, since this would help strike a better balance between the interests at stake, in particular, between the right to freedom of expression and the rights to reputation and private life; whereas the problem of the applicable law will be considered specifically in a legislative initiative on the Rome II Regulation; whereas, nevertheless, some guidance should be given to national courts in the amended regulation,
R. ker bi bilo treba, kar zadeva začasne ukrepe, pojasniti zadevo Danilauer, in sicer zlasti, da je mogoče na podlagi uredbe priznati in izvršiti enostranske ukrepe pod pogojem, da jim je tožena stranka imela možnost ugovarjati;
R. whereas, as regards provisional measures, the Denilauer case-law should be clarified by making it clear that ex parte measures can be recognised and enforced on the basis of the Regulation provided that the defendant has had the opportunity to contest them,
S. ker je nejasno, do katere mere so zaščitni ukrepi, katerih namen je pridobivanje informacij in dokazov, izključeni iz področja uporabe člena 31 uredbe,
S. whereas it is unclear to what extent protective orders aimed at obtaining information and evidence are excluded from the scope of Article 31 of the Regulation ,
Izčrpen pojem mednarodnega zasebnega prava
Comprehensive concept for private international law
Odprava eksekvature
Abolition of exequatur
6. meni, da je treba zaradi zmanjšanja stroškov prevajanje odločbe, ki jo je treba izvršiti, omejiti le na končno odločbo (izrek in povzetek obrazložitve), celotni prevod pa se zahteva le v primeru vložitve vloge za izredni postopek;
Believes that, in order to save costs, the translation of the decision to be enforced could be limited to the final order (operative part and summary grounds), but that a full translation should be required in the event that an application is made for the exceptional procedure;
Javne listine
Authentic instruments
Področje uporabe Uredbe
Scope of the Regulation
Izbira sodišča
Choice of court
13. meni, da bi Uredba morala vsebovati novo določbo, ki bi obravnavala možnost, da tretja stran ugovarja sporazumom o izbiri sodišča; meni, da bi taka določba lahko določala, da osebo, ki ni stranka pogodbe, zavezuje izključni sporazum o izbiri sodišča, sklenjen v skladu z Uredbo, le, če: (a) je ta sporazum vsebovan v pisnem dokumentu ali elektronskem zapisu; (b) je ta oseba pravočasno in ustrezno obveščena o sodišču, na katerega je treba vložiti tožbo; (c) pri pogodbah o prevozu blaga, je izbrano sodišče (i) v kraju prebivališča prevoznika; (ii) v kraju sprejema, dogovorjenem v pogodbi o prevozu; (iii) v kraju dostave, dogovorjenem v pogodbi o prevozu, ali (iv) v pristanišču, kjer je blago najprej naloženo na ladjo, ali v pristanišču, kjer je blago dokončno raztovorjeno z ladje; meni, da bi moralo biti prav tako določeno, da lahko v vseh drugih primerih tretja stran vloži tožbo na sodišču, ki je sicer pristojno v skladu z Uredbo, če je očitno, da bi bilo vztrajanje pri tem, da se tretja stran drži izbranega sodišča, očitno nepravično;
Considers that the Regulation should contain a new provision dealing with the opposability of choice-of-court agreements against third parties; takes the view that such provision could provide that a person who is not a party to the contract will be bound by an exclusive choice-of-court agreement concluded in accordance with the Regulation only if: (a) that agreement is contained in a written document or electronic record; (b) that person is given timely and adequate notice of the court where the action is to be brought; (c) in contracts for carriage of goods, the chosen court is (i) the domicile of the carrier; (ii) the place of receipt agreed in the contract of carriage; (iii) the place of delivery agreed in the contract of carriage, or (iv) the port where the goods are initially loaded on a ship or the port where the goods are finally discharged from a ship; considers that it should further be provided that, in all other cases, the third party may bring an action before the court otherwise competent under the Regulation if it appears that holding that party to the chosen forum would be blatantly unfair;
KOM(2009)154 končno; Člen 5. ;
COM(2009)154 final; Art. 5. ;
Delovanje uredbe v mednarodnem pravnem redu
Operation of the Regulation in the international legal order
UL L 147, 10.6.2009, str.
OJ L 147, 10.6.2009, p.
5. iz leta 2007 uporabili kot model in navdih za takšno konvencijo o mednarodnih sodbah;
5. could serve as a model and inspiration for such an international judgments convention;
20. zavrača enotno opredelitev sedeža podjetij v okviru uredbe Bruselj I, saj bi bilo treba o opredelitvi s tako daljnosežnimi posledicami razpravljati in se o njej dogovoriti v okviru razvoja evropskega prava družb;
Rejects a uniform definition of the domicile of companies within the Brussels I Regulation, since a definition with such far-reaching consequences should be discussed and decided within the scope of a developing European company law;
Obrestne mere
Interest rates
Industrijska lastnina
Industrial property