natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To je bil dejansko izvod že obstoječih izjav o dejavnosti, priloženih predhodnemu predlogu proračuna.
This was essentially a copy of already existing Activity Statements provided with the PDB.
Koristen je bil, ker je Komisija dejansko zelo tesno sodelovala pri pripravi osnovne dokumentacije za to pobudo Odbora za proračun.
It had the merit of the Commission actually assisting very closely in preparing background material for this initiative of the Budgets Committee.
Njegova pomanjkljivost je bila, da se je obravnaval kot preveč strokoven (mogoče zaradi predstavitve), poleg tega pa tema, izbrana za skupino za spremljanje, mogoče ne ustreza izjavi o dejavnosti oblikovanja proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti.
It had the disadvantage of being perceived as too technical (perhaps a question of presentation) and, also, that the subject chosen for a Monitoring Group might not necessarily correspond to an ABB "Activity Statement".
Po predvidevanjih je bila Komisija zastopana na ravni generalnih direktorjev ali direktorjev.
The level of participation has been the intended from the Commission's side, i.e. Director General or Director.
To je seveda omogočilo ustreznejše odgovore na vprašanja, ki so pogosto bolj politična kot strokovna.
This has clearly allowed more relevant answers to questions which by their nature are often more political than technical.
V praktičnem in organizacijskem smislu se je izkazalo, da je ena ura ali ena ura in pol ustrezen čas trajanja sestankov, ki zagotovi osredotočenost razprave.
In practical and organisational terms, 1 or 1 ½ hours have turned out to be a suitable duration of meetings in order to keep the debate focussed.
Izkazalo se je, da je zelo koristno, če Komisija vsako temo predstavi s pregledom sedanjega stanja, vendar so bile v nekaterih primerih te predstavitve nekoliko preveč podrobne in za nestrokovnjake težko razumljive.
It has proven very useful that the Commission introduces each subject by an overview of the current "state-of-play" although, in some cases, these presentations have been slightly too detailed and difficult to follow for "non-experts".
Dokumentacija, ki so jo potrdili koordinatorji
Documentation approved by the coordinators
Ø Vedno je treba zagotoviti informacije o ozadju (kot je „obrazloženi dnevni red“).
Ø A background note (type " annotated agenda" should always be prepared
Ø Po potrebi se lahko za predložitev podatkov o izvrševanju itd. uporabijo tudi strokovni „informativni listi“ o posebnem programu/proračunski vrstici.
Ø As and when necessary, technical "fact-sheets" on a specific programme/budget line could also be used to set out implementation figures etc.
Ø Sestaviti je treba povzetek vsakega sestanka, ki se lahko uporabi tudi kot „opomnik“ za mogoče dodatno ukrepanje glede proračunskega postopka/predlogov sprememb.
Ø A summary of each meeting should be produced, which could also serve as a "reminder" for possible follow-up in the budget procedure/amendments
Kar zadeva razprave s Komisijo, so se kot najboljši izkazali podrobnejši/bolj osredotočeni dnevni redi.
More specific/concentrated agendas have worked best as far as any debate/discussion with the Commission is concerned.
Za takšne skupine bi se lahko osnovna dokumentacija dopolnila.
It could be considered to further develop the background material for such groups.
To bi bilo mogoče s prilagajanjem informativnih listov, ki jih pripravi Komisija.
This could possibly be done through adaptation of the fact-sheets prepared by the Commission.
Zdaj dokumenti, ki jih zagotavlja Komisija, nimajo veliko dodane vrednosti, čeprav so zelo uporabni kot osnovna strokovna pomoč.
At present, there is not much added value in the documents given by the Commission, although they are to be very much welcomed as pure technical assistance.
Drugi način bi bil, da se zagotovi več časa za oblikovanje vprašanj.
Another way could be to simply leave more time for developing the questions.
Tretji način, ki bi ga lahko koordinatorji obravnavali za vsak primer posebej, je lahko zahteva za (notranji ali zunanji) opomnik v zvezi z zadevno temo.
A third way, that could be looked into by coordinators on a case-by-case basis, could possibly be to order a briefing note (internal or external) on a given subject.
Zaradi natrpanega časovnega razporeda do zdaj ni bilo mogoče sestaviti takojšnjih povzetkov vsakega sestanka.
The heavy schedule so far has not allowed drawing up immediate summaries of each meeting.
Nekateri od glavnih rezultatov so vključeni v ta delovni dokument in so namenjeni vsem članom odbora.
Some of the main outcomes are included in this working document for the benefit of all committee members.
Ker so bile povabljene vse skupine, je vsaka stran lahko sprejela in zabeležila informacije/odgovore, ki so se ji zdeli najkoristnejši.
Also, given that all groups are invited, each party has of course been able to take onboard and note down the information/replies that it considered most useful.
V več primerih se je od Komisije zahtevala predložitev pisnih odgovorov in informacij.
Also, in various cases, the Commission has been asked to submit written replies and information.
To se je dejansko izkazalo kot zelo koristno in takšne dodatne obrazložitve se po sestankih posredujejo prek elektronske pošte.
This has proven to be very useful indeed and such follow-up is transmitted by mail following the meetings.
Splošni sklepi
Overall Conclusions:
Skupine za spremljanje so se med proračunskim postopkom izkazale kot zelo koristen instrument, bolj strukturiran pristop, ki se je zdaj sprejel, zlasti kar zadeva večje sodelovanje Komisije pri pripravah in koordinatorjev pri opredeljevanju tem, pa se je izkazal kot konstruktiven.
The monitoring groups have proved to be a very useful tool in the course of the budgetary procedure and the more structured approach now adopted, especially as concerns the increased involvement of the Commission in the preparations, and of the coordinators in terms of defining the subjects, proved to be constructive.
Odzivi specializiranih odborov in političnih skupin so na splošno pozitivni, razen mogočih pripomb glede preobsežnega načrtovanja in kratkih časovnih rokov za vabila.
Reactions from specialised committees and from political groups seem generally positive, with the possible exception of too tight planning and short deadlines for invitations.
Sodelovanje z drugimi odbori je mogoče dodatno okrepiti, vendar je to odvisno tudi od časa za pripravo, ki je na voljo.
The cooperation with other committees could be further strengthened but this is also linked to the preparation time available.
Število sestankov je treba zmanjšati na 3 ali 4 na proračunski postopek, da se omogoči boljša priprava in sodelovanje.
The number of meetings should be reduced to 3 or 4 per budget procedure in order to allow for more thorough preparation and cooperation.
Za odločanje o temah morajo biti še naprej odgovorni koordinatorji političnih skupin ob upoštevanju predlogov glavnega(-ih) poročevalca(-ev).
The responsibility to decide on the subjects should remain with the coordinators of political groups, based on proposals from the general rapporteur(s).
Teme je treba izbrati v začetku leta (maj je bil prepozen za odločitev o tem).
The selection of subjects should be taken early in the year (May was clearly too late to decide)
Oblika sestankov in dokumentacija zanje sta bili v praksi sorazmerno ustrezni, vendar je bil kratek čas za pripravo leta 2007 očitna pomanjkljivost.
The format and documentation for the meetings have worked relatively well although, again, the short time for preparations in 2007 was clearly a disadvantage.
Čeprav je bil majhen delež „opozoril“, tj. obveščanja o proračunskih napovedih, vedno vključen v standardizirani informativni list, je mogoče ta vidik/povezavo v naslednjih letih okrepiti, kar zadeva leto n.
Although a small section of the Budget Forecast Alert "warnings" was always included in the standardised fact-sheet, this aspect/linkage could possibly be strengthened for coming years as far as year N is concerned.
Priloga 1.
Annex 1.
Skupna izjava Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije za zagotavljanje primernega izvajanja proračuna (sprejeta na usklajevalnem sestanku za proračun leta 2006).
Joint statement of the European Parliament and the Commission to ensure proper budget implementation (adopted at the 2006 November Budget Conciliation).
Evropski parlament in Komisija v okviru proračunskega postopka poudarjata potrebo po boljši stroškovni učinkovitosti v proračunu EU in menita, da je treba ta koncept trajno uveljaviti.
In the framework of the budgetary procedure the European Parliament and the Commission emphasise the need for improved value for money in the EU budget and are of the opinion that this concept must be applied on a permanent basis.
Cilj tega pristopa je ocena količinskih in kakovostnih vidikov posameznega programa EU.
The aim of this approach is to evaluate and assess the quantitative and qualitative aspects of each EU programme.
V tem okviru mora ocenjevanje programov EU postati ključna skrb institucij, ki so vključene v letni proračunski postopek.
In this context, the evaluation of EU programmes should become a major element of concern for the institutions involved in the annual budgetary procedure.
Evropski parlament in Komisija opozarjata, da upravljanje na podlagi dejavnosti ponuja celovit pregled uspešnosti in stroškov različnih politik, vključno z operativnimi in upravnimi sredstvi.
The European Parliament and the Commission recall that Activity-Based Management (ABM) is to offer an integrated view of the performance and cost of the various policy areas including both operational and administrative resources.
Instituciji se strinjata, da bosta storili vse potrebno za izboljšanje spremljanja izvrševanja proračuna s postopkom, v kateremu bodo sodelovali vsi odbori Evropskega Parlamenta, in z uporabo vseh informacij, ki so na voljo od januarja 2007.
The two Institutions agree to take the necessary steps with regard to improving the monitoring of budget implementation through a process using all available information as from January 2007 to which all committees of the European Parliament will be associated.
Evropski parlament se obvezuje, da bo v skladu s svojimi prednostnimi nalogami in medinstitucionalnimi pristojnostmi bolje uporabil prerazporeditve in spremembe proračuna kot instrumente za nadzor izvajanja proračuna med letom.
The European Parliament undertakes to make better use of transfers and amending budgets as instruments to scrutinise budget implementation during the year in respect of Parliament's priorities and its inter-institutional prerogatives.
Rezultati tega trajnega procesa bodo predmet izmenjave mnenj v vsakem trialogu, predvidenem v Prilogi II Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006.
The results of this ongoing process will be the subject of exchange of views in each trialogue foreseen in Annex II of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
Namen tega postopka je zagotoviti, da bodo politike, ki jih financira proračun EU, stroškovno učinkovitejše za evropske državljane in da bodo odgovorile na izzive, s katerimi se sooča Evropska unija, z najboljšim možnim dodeljevanjem sredstev EU.
This exercise aims to ensure that policies financed by the EU budget deliver better value for money to European citizens and respond to the challenges which the European Union faces through the best possible allocation of EU funds.
Skupine za spremljanje, določene za proračunska postopka 2007 in 2008
Monitoring Groups decided for the 2007/2008 procedures
Raziskave na področju energetike in prometa
Research in the field of energy and transport
Skupna politika priseljevanja in skupna azilna politika
Common immigration and asylum policies
Evropska pobuda za demokracijo in človekove pravice (EIDHR), Evropski sosedski instrument, razvojna politika
European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) European Neighbourhood instrument Development Policy
Program za konkurenčnost in inovacije (CIP)
Innovation Programme (CIP)
Spodbujanje podjetništva/konkurenčnosti
Encouraging Entrepreneurship/Competitiveness
Strategija in usklajevanje kmetijske politike Okoljski instrumenti: NATURA 2000, Life +
Agricultural policy strategy and coordination The Environment instruments : NATURA 2000, Life +
Povzetek doseženega
Summary of the results
Skupina za spremljanje raziskav na področju energije in prometa
Monitoring Group on research in the field of energy and transport
Na pobudo prisotnih članov se je razprava osredotočila zlasti na vprašanje agencij, upravnih stroškov in programa Galileo.
At the initiative of the members present, the discussion was quite focussed on the question of agencies, administrative costs and, also, Galileo.
Komisija je bila zastopana na ravni direktorjev.
The Commission was represented at the level of Directors.
Člani so obravnavali dve novi izvajalski agenciji, ki ju Komisija predvideva za izvajanje sedmega okvirnega programa.
The 2 new Executive Agencies that the Commission envisages for the implementation of FP7 were of concern for members.
Komisija je morala pojasniti, zakaj tega izvajanja ne more zagotavljati sama.
The Commission had to explain why it cannot take care of this implementation itself.
Predstavniki Komisije so napovedali predstavitev ustrezne ocene učinka ter analize stroškov in koristi.
The Commission representatives announced that a proper impact assessment and a cost/benefit analysis will be presented.
Člani so Komisijo opozorili, da je lahko šesti okvirni program izvajala brez izvajalskih agencij.
Members reminded the Commission that FP6 could be implemented by the Commission without any Executive Agency.
V zvezi s programom Galileo je Komisija priznala, da za operativno stopnjo ni mogoče porabiti dodeljenih sredstev, dokler se ne sprejme pravna podlaga (prva obravnava v Svetu še vedno poteka).
On Galileo the Commission admitted that no CA can be spent for the operational phase as long as the legal base (1st reading still pending in Council) is not adopted.
Zanimivo je bilo slišati tudi, da se za razvoj programa Galileo porabi približno 40 milijonov EUR na leto iz proračuna za raziskave (zlasti sedmega okvirnega programa).
It was also interesting to hear that about 40 million/year out of the research budget (mainly FP7) are spent on the development of Galileo.
Komisija je potrdila, da je bilo treba po koncu pogajanj o finančnih perspektivah, ki so vključevala zmanjšanje odobrenih proračunskih sredstev iz postavke 1a v primerjavi s tako imenovanim „Prodijevem paketom“, obseg več predvidenih raziskovalnih projektov zmanjšati ali jih izvesti šele pozneje.
The Commission confirmed that, following the outcome of the negotiations on the financial perspectives, which included a reduction of appropriations under heading 1a compared to the so-called "Prodi package", the scope of several research projects that had been envisaged had to be reduced or can only be carried out later.
Člani so predlagali, da se zaradi izboljšanja preglednosti skupni upravni stroški raziskav vključijo v izjavo o dejavnosti.
Members suggested that the overall administrative cost of research should be included in the activity statement in order to improve transparency.
Izkazalo se je tudi, da se do zdaj iz proračuna za leto 2007 niso uporabila sredstva za sedmi okvirni program.
It also became clear that so far there is no execution at all of FP7 out of the 2007 budget.
Komisija meni, da je bilo izvajanje/zaključek petega okvirnega programa v skladu s predvidevanji.
According to the Commission the implementation/final wrapping-up of FP5 was in line with the forecast.
Vendar je pri šestem okvirnem programu prišlo do zaostankov (1–2 meseca zamude) zaradi notranjih organizacijskih težav in nepredvidene mobilnosti osebja.
However, there were delays (1-2 months behind schedule) with FP6 due to internal organisational problems and unforeseen mobility of staff.
Skupina za spremljanje politike priseljevanja in azilne politike
Monitoring Group on immigration and asylum policies
Komisija je opisala položaj v zvezi s tremi skladi EU na tem področju, ki se vsi upravljajo po načelu deljenega upravljanja.
The Commission described the situation with regard to the three EU Funds in this area, all managed under the shared management principle.
Razvite so bile strateške smernice, države članice pa bodo oblikovale projekte na podlagi večletnega programa.
The strategic guidelines were being developed and, subsequently, the Member States would establish the projects on the basis of a Multi-Annual programme.
Vendar se ta postopek še ni v celoti zaključil in obstajalo je resno tveganje znatno premajhne uporabe plačil v letu 2007.
This process was not quite finished, however, and there was a grave risk that there would be considerable under-utilisation of payments in 2007.
Za novi sklad za vključevanje se leta 2007 plačila ne bodo izvedla.
For the new Integration Fund, no payments at all would be made in 2007.
Pravna podlaga za ta sklad se še ni dokončno oblikovala (še vedno je treba razrešiti pridržek Združenega kraljestva v Svetu).
The legal base for this Fund was not completed yet (UK reserve still remaining to be lifted in the Council).
Po vprašanjih poslancev Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi z Evropsko migracijsko mrežo je Komisija izrazila zaskrbljenost zaradi odsotnosti pravne podlage in navedla, da bo oblikovala predlog zanjo.
Following questions from MEPs regarding the European Migration Network, the Commission expressed worry that no legal base exists and stated that they would propose one.
Žal se lahko pojavijo razlike med obstoječimi mrežami in obdobjem, ko se lahko vzpostavi nova pravna podlaga.
Unfortunately, there could be a gap between existing networks and the time when a new legal base could be in place.
V zvezi z agencijo Frontex je Komisija odgovorila, da so dejansko opredelili nove „potrebe“ za proračun za leto 2007 in da predlog za spremembo proračuna zdaj obravnava upravni odbor.
On Frontex, the Commission answered that they had indeed identified new "needs" for the 2007 budget and that a proposal for a revised budget was currently being considered by the Management Board.
Ni bilo popolnoma jasno, kako bi lahko takšne nove „potrebe“ uresničili v obliki ukrepov (sprememba proračuna?, prenosi?).
It was not entirely clear how such new "needs" would be translated into possible action (amending budget? transfers?).
Tudi v letu 2008 agencija Frontex ne bi mogla zagotoviti stalnih ukrepov za nadzor morske meje in predsednik Barroso je na Malti navedel, da Komisija preučuje druge ukrepe.
For 2008, Frontex would still not have the capacity to ensure permanent actions for sea border control and President Barroso had said in Malta that the Commission is considering other actions.
Člani so izjavili, da se mora Komisija glede agencije Frontex zelo jasno opredeliti.
Members stated that the Commission needs to be very clear on Frontex.
V zvezi s sistemom SIS II je Komisija navedla cilj, da se ta sistem vzpostavi in začne izvajati do decembra 2008 (države članice in Komisija zdaj uporabljajo prehodno rešitev).
On SIS II, the Commission stated that the goal was to have it up and running by December 2008 (MS and Commission are currently operating a bridging solution).
Obstajajo tri stopnje: razvoj, začasni način upravljanja (Francija in Avstrija?) in končni način upravljanja.
There are three phases: development, provisional management mode (France+Austria?) and Final management mode.
Kar zadeva vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS), je bil določen cilj, da se ga pripravi do prve polovice leta 2009.
On VIS, the goal was to have it ready by the first semester of 2009.
Skupina za spremljanje programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije ter konkurenčnosti
Monitoring group on CIP and competitiveness
Komisija je bila zastopana na ravni direktorjev s 4 glavnimi generalnimi direktorati Komisije, in sicer GD za podjetništvo, informacijsko družbo, energetiko in promet ter gospodarske in finančne zadeve, skupaj z zadevnimi spremljajočimi uradniki, da bi obravnavali podrobnejša vprašanja članov med razpravo.
The Commission was represented at Director-level by the 4 main Commission DGs involved Enterprise, Infso, Tren, Ecfin - with supporting officials in each case to cover more detailed issues raised by members during discussion.
– Začetna predstavitev Komisije je zagotovila dober pregled in glavna področja programa (ter se dobro navezala na spremno dokumentacijo, ki jo je zagotovila Komisija):
- The Commission's initial presentation gave a good overview and the main areas of the programme (and linked well to the accompanying documentation supplied by the Commission):
– program za podjetništvo in inovacije ter izboljšanje finančnega okolja za MSP;
-enterprise and innovation programme and improving the financial environment for SMEs;
– program inteligentne energije;
-intelligent energy programme;
– podporni program za politiko IKT.
- ICT support programme
– Razprave s člani so se odločno osredotočile na dejanska upravna sredstva, potrebna za izvajanje teh programov, in zlasti zneske, ki niso bili neposredno vidni v proračunu v vrsticah „01 04“ postavke 5 ali prek izvajalskih agencij.
- The discussions with members focussed heavily on the real administrative resources needed to run these programmes and in particular the amounts that were not directly visible in the budget either in Heading 5, through the "01 04" lines, or via executive agencies.
– Kar zadeva posojila za MSP, ki jih izvaja Evropski investicijski sklad v imenu Komisije, je potekala obsežna razprava o mejah pristojnosti in odgovornosti ter odstotku prihodkov iz poslovanja, ki se izplača Evropskemu investicijskemu skladu.
- As regards SME lending carried out by the EIF on behalf of the Commission there was an extensive discussion about lines of responsibility and accountability and about the percentage of the operational expenditure paid to the EIF.
Komisija je zagotovila podrobne ustne odgovore glede meje odgovornosti.
The Commission was able to provide detailed oral answers about lines of accountability.
– V zvezi s prihodki iz poslovanja, ki se uporabljajo za upravo, je Komisija navedla, da kljub temu, da je v prejšnjem večletnem programu Evropski investicijski sklad za dajanje posojil pridobil pristojbino 9 % prihodkov iz poslovanja, je v programu za konkurenčnost in inovacije ta odstotek okoli 6 %.
- On operational expenditure used for administration, the Commission indicated that whereas under the previous MAP programme the EIF had taken a fee of 9% of the operational expenditure for its lending activities, under the CIP programme the percentage would be around 6%.
Vendar je treba te zneske dodati upravnim stroškom, navedenim v spremni dokumentaciji, ki jo je Komisija zagotovila za program za konkurenčnost in inovacije.
These amounts were however additional to the stated administrative costs in the accompanying documentation provided by the Commission for the CIP programme as a whole.
Komisija je navedla, da bo zagotovila natančnejše pisne informacije o tem vprašanju.
The Commission said that it would provide more precise information on this matter in writing.
– Člani so izrazili tudi zaskrbljenost glede neprekinjenosti posojil za MSP med prehodom z večletnega programa k programu za konkurenčnost in inovacije.
- Members also cited concerns about the continuity of lending to SMEs during the transition from MAP to CIP.
Komisija je izjavila, da bo poleti 2007 prišlo do kratke finančne vrzeli.
The Commission indicated that there would be a short financing gap in summer 2007.
– Potekala je kratka razprava o obsegu, v katerem lahko sredstva iz programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije prispevajo k projektu Evropskega inštituta za tehnologijo, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, vendar ga Svet in Parlament še nista potrdila.
- There was a brief discussion of the extent to which CIP funds might be used to contribute to the EIT project proposed by the Commission, but not yet agreed by Council and Parliament.
Prisotni uradniki Komisije so menili, da so sredstva, namenjena za program za konkurenčnost in inovacije, že zdaj precej omejena.
The Commission officials present thought that the resources foreseen for the CIP programme were already rather tight.