natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Že prejšnje direktive, zlasti direktiva 2001/105/ES (ena izmed treh iz zakonodajnega paketa Erika I), so opozorile, da je treba nujno preoblikovati sedanji sistem odobritve klasifikacijskih zavodov s strani Skupnosti, vzpostavljen z direktivo 94/57/, ki je sicer prispeval k precejšnjemu napredku na tem področju.
Previous directives, particularly Directive 2001/105/EC, one of three proposals in the Erika 1 legislative package, have already raised the serious need to reform the present system for Community recognition of classification societies, set up by Directive 94/57/EC; the substantial progress that they made was then reinforced by the Council’s conclusions of 13 December 2002 and Parliament’s resolutions on strengthening safety at sea ( 2003/2235(INI) and the resolution adopted after the wreck of the Prestige ( 2003/2066(INI) ).
K vprašanju se je treba vrniti zato, ker je pomembno, da se ponovno in še dodatno okrepijo dejavnosti teh organov, ki bi jih bilo treba po zagotovilih različnih dejavnikov pomorskega sektorja izumiti, če že ne bi obstajali, tako zelo pomembno vlogo igrajo pri ohranjanju varnosti na morju.
However, as mentioned there are still serious deficiencies today in the process of inspecting and certifying recognised organisations, and this poses a serious and unacceptable threat to safety and the environment.
Priznane organizacije imajo precejšnji vpliv na varnostno verigo v pomorskem prometu, ta vpliv pa mora biti predmet temeljitega nadzora pristojnih služb, ki morajo zagotoviti odločno in povsem neodvisno ravnanje organizacij, pristojnih za nadzor nad tem, ali ladje, ki plujejo po naših vodah, ustrezajo mednarodnim standardom s področja varnosti in preprečevanja onesnaževanja.
These should guarantee that the organisations that are required to ensure that the vessels on our seas comply with the relevant international safety and anti-pollution standards act with independence and rigour.
Skupno stališče Sveta
The Council common position
Po preučitvi skupnega stališča Sveta, s katerim se prvotni predlog direktive razdeli na dva pravna instrumenta, predlog uredbe in predlog direktive, smo mnenja, da je pristop ustrezen.
Having examined the Council common position, which splits what was previously a single proposal for a directive into two legal instruments, a proposal for a regulation and a proposal for a directive, we believe that this is the right approach.
Zaustavljanje ob spremembah v skupnem stališču Sveta in primerjava s stališčem Parlamenta v končni fazi ne pomeni, da bo nemogoče najti način, kako doseči soglasje med Parlamentom, Komisijo in Svetom.
Dwelling on the changes made by the Council’s common position compared to the position adopted by Parliament does not ultimately mean that it will be impossible to find ways to achieve consensus between Parliament, the Commission and the Council.
Naše mnenje je, da je skupno stališče pozitivno in da v glavnem upošteva pristop Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi.
Indeed, our view is that the common position is positive and largely takes on board the approach followed by Parliament at first reading.
Menimo, da obstajajo trdni temelji za končni dogovor.
In any case, we believe that there is a sound basis for a final agreement.
Naše stališče temelji na premisleku, da je treba skupino sedmih predlogov (dejansko gre za sedem plus ena, saj je bil predlog direktive o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav razdeljen na dva pravna instrumenta, in sicer na predlog direktive o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav ter na predlog uredbe o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij), ki sestavljajo sveženj Erika III, nujno obravnavati kot povezano celoto in se ga ne sme deliti, da se prepreči nedoslednost.
Our approach is prompted by the belief that it is vital to treat the package of seven proposals which make up the ‘Erika III package’ (in reality seven plus one, with the splitting of the proposal for a directive on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations into two legal instruments, namely a proposal for a directive on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations and a proposal for a regulation for common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations) as an interconnected and inseparable whole, in order to avoid inconsistencies.
To seveda ne spreminja dejstva, da je vsak predlog samostojna celota.
However, this does not detract from the fact that each proposal has its own importance.
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (5724/2/2008 – C6‑0222/2008 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (5724/2/2008 – C6‑0222/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0331/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0331/2008 ),
Direktiva 2008/…/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih predpisih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za inšpekcijski pregled in nadzor ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav
Directive …/…/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (Recast)
Direktiva …/…/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izpolnjevanju obveznosti države zastave in o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za inšpekcijski pregled in nadzor ladij, ter za ustrezne dejavnosti pomorskih uprav (Prenovitev)
Directive .../.../EC of the European Parliament and the Council on compliance with flag State requirements and on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (Recast)
Predloga Komisije o nadzoru države zastave in klasifikacijskih zavodih sta oba del tretjega paketa zakonodajnih ukrepov o pomorski varnosti, t.j. sklopa medsebojno povezanih predlogov.
The Commission proposals on flag state control and classification societies both form part of the third maritime safety package, a set of interrelated proposals.
(3) Svet je v Resoluciji z dne 8. junija 1993 o skupni varnostni politiki v pomorskem prometu določil za cilj odstranitev vseh plovil iz voda Skupnosti, ki ne izpolnjujejo standardov, in dal prednost akcijskemu programu Skupnosti, namenjenemu zagotovitvi učinkovitega in enotnega izvajanja mednarodnih pravil z oblikovanjem skupnih standardov za klasifikacijske zavode.
(3) In its Resolution of 8 June 1993 on a common policy on safe seas, the Council set the objective of removing all substandard vessels from Community waters and gave priority to Community action designed to secure the effective and uniform implementation of international rules by drawing up common standards for classification societies.
(3) Svet je v Resoluciji z dne 8. junija 1993 o skupni varnostni politiki v pomorskem prometu določil za cilj odstranitev vseh plovil iz voda Skupnosti, ki ne izpolnjujejo standardov, in dal prednost akcijskemu programu Skupnosti, namenjenemu zagotovitvi učinkovitega in enotnega izvajanja mednarodnih pravil z oblikovanjem skupnih standardov za klasifikacijske zavode , opredeljene kot organizacije, pooblaščene za inšpekcijski pregled in nadzor ladij (v nadaljevanju „priznane organizacije”) .
(3) In its Resolution of 8 June 1993 on a common policy on safe seas 1 , the Council set the objective of removing all substandard vessels from Community waters and gave priority to Community action designed to secure the effective and uniform implementation of international rules by drawing up common standards for classification societies , defined as ship inspection and survey organisations (hereinafter “ recognised organisations ” ) .
Čeprav je prejšnje besedilo natančno navedeno in čeprav so se zadevni organi prej imenovali „klasifikacijski zavodi“, je treba v celotni direktivi uporabiti enako poimenovanje.
Although the earlier text is quoted accurately and the bodies in question used to be called ‘classification societies’, the same name ought to be used throughout the directive.
Predlog spremembe obnavlja stališče Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave.
The purpose of this amendment is to reinstate Parliament’s position at first reading.
Glej prvo obravnavo, predlog spremembe 1.
See first-reading Amendment 1.
(8) Veliko število obstoječih klasifikacijskih zavodov po svetu, kadar te delujejo v imenu nacionalnih uprav, ne zagotavljajo niti ustreznega izvajanja pravil niti zadostne zanesljivosti, ker nimajo zanesljivih in primernih struktur ter izkušenj, da bi lahko opravljali svoje obveznosti na visoki strokovni ravni.
(8) Worldwide a large number of the existing classification societies do not ensure either adequate implementation of the rules or sufficient reliability when acting on behalf of national administrations as they do not have reliable and adequate structures and experience to enable them to carry out their duties in a highly professional manner.
(8) Veliko število obstoječih priznanih organizacij po svetu, kadar te delujejo v imenu nacionalnih uprav, ne zagotavlja niti ustreznega izvajanja pravil niti potrebne zanesljivosti, saj nimajo primernih struktur ter izkušenj, da bi lahko opravljale svoje naloge na visoki strokovni ravni.
(8) Worldwide a large number of the existing recognised organisations do not ensure either adequate implementation of the rules or the necessary reliability when acting on behalf of national administrations as they do not have adequate structures and experience to enable them to carry out their tasks in a highly professional manner.
Predlog spremembe obnavlja stališče Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave.
The purpose of the above amendment is to reinstate Parliament's position at first reading.
Glej prvo obravnavo, predlog spremembe 4.
See first-reading Amendment 4.
Velja za celotno besedilo.
This amendment applies throughout.
Če bo sprejet, bo treba ustrezno spremeniti celotno besedilo.
If it is adopted, the entire text will need to be altered accordingly.
(9) V skladu s predpisom 3-1 dela A-1 poglavja II-1 SOLAS 74 so države članice dolžne zagotavljati, da so ladje, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, načrtovane, grajene in vzdrževane v skladu s konstrukcijskimi, mehaničnimi in električnimi zahtevami, ki jih določijo s strani uprav priznani klasifikacijski zavodi.
(9) In accordance with SOLAS 74 Chapter II-1, Part A-1, Regulation 3-1, Member States are responsible for ensuring that ships flying their flag are designed, constructed and maintained in compliance with the structural, mechanical and electrical requirements of classification societies recognised by administrations.
Ti zavodi zato pripravijo in izvajajo pravila glede načrtovanja, gradnje, vzdrževanja in nadzora ladij ter so odgovorni za tehnični nadzor ladij v imenu držav zastave ter za potrjevanje, da te ladje izpolnjujejo zahteve iz mednarodnih konvencij za izdajanje ustreznih spričeval.
These societies therefore produce and implement rules for the design, construction, maintenance and inspection of ships and they are responsible for inspecting ships on behalf of the flag States and certifying that those ships meet the requirements of the international conventions for the issue of the relevant certificates.
Da bi jim omogočili zadovoljivo opravljanje te obveznosti, bi morali biti ti zavodi strogo neodvisni, visoko tehnično usposobljeni ter bi morali imeti visoko kvaliteto upravljanja.
To enable them to carry out that duty in a satisfactory manner they need to have strict independence, highly specialised technical competence and rigorous quality management.
(9) Poleg tega te priznane organizacije predpisujejo in izvajajo pravila glede zasnove, gradnje, vzdrževanja in nadzora ladij in so odgovorne za inšpekcijske preglede ladij v imenu države zastave ter potrjevanje, da te ladje izpolnjujejo zahteve iz mednarodnih konvencij za izdajo ustreznih spričeval.
(9) In a ddition, these recognised organisations produce and implement rules for the design, construction, maintenance and inspection of ships and they are responsible for inspecting ships on behalf of the flag States and certifying that those ships meet the requirements of the international conventions for the issue of the relevant certificates.
(13) Ta direktiva bi morala zagotoviti svobodo opravljanja storitev v Skupnosti, zato bi moralo biti Skupnosti dovoljeno, da se s tistimi tretjimi državami, v katerih se nahajajo nekatere od priznanih organizacij, pogaja, da se zagotovi enako obravnavanje priznanih organizacij, ki se nahajajo v Skupnosti.
(13) This Directive should ensure freedom to provide services in the Community , accordingly the Community should be entitled to negotiate, with those third countries where some of the recognised organisations are located, in order to ensure equal treatment for the recognised organisations located in the Community.
(13) Ta direktiva bi morala zagotoviti svobodo opravljanja storitev v Skupnosti, zato bi moralo biti Komisiji dovoljeno, da se s tistimi tretjimi državami, v katerih se nahajajo nekatere od priznanih organizacij, pogaja, da se zagotovi enako obravnavanje priznanih organizacij s sedežem v Skupnosti.
(13) This Directive should ensure freedom to provide services in the Community ; accordingly the Comm ission should be entitled to negotiate, with those third countries where some of the recognised organisations are located, equal treatment for the recognised organisations domiciled in the Community.
Glej prvo obravnavo, predlog spremembe 8.
See first-reading Amendment 8.
(15) Različnost režimov finančne odgovornosti priznanih organizacij, ki delujejo v imenu držav članic, bi ovirala pravilno izvajanje te direktive.
(15) Divergence in the financial liability regimes of the recognised organisations working on behalf of the Member States would impede the proper implementation of this Directive.
Kot prispevek k reševanju tega problema je smiselno zagotoviti določeno raven usklajenosti na ravni Skupnosti glede odgovornosti za morebitne nezgode, ki jih povzroči priznana organizacija, o čemer odloča sodišče, vključno z reševanjem sporov z arbitražnimi postopki.
In order to contribute to solving this problem it is appropriate to bring about a degree of harmonisation at Community level of the liability arising out of any marine casualty caused by a recognised organisation, as decided by a court of law, including settlement of a dispute through arbitration procedures.
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
(15) Divergence in t erms of financial liability regimes among the recognised organisations working on behalf of the Member States would impede the proper implementation of this Directive.
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
See first-reading Amendment 10.
(18) Državam članicam bi bilo ne glede na to treba pustiti možnost, da začasno odvzamejo ali prekličejo svoje pooblastilo priznani organizaciji , pri čemer o svojih odločitvah obvestijo Komisijo in druge države članice ter za to podajo utemeljene razloge .
(18) Member States should nevertheless be left with the possibility of suspending or withdrawing their authorisation of a recognised organisation while informing the Commission and the other Member States of their decisions and giving substantiated reasons therefor e .
(18) Državam članicam bi bilo ne glede na to treba pustiti možnost, da začasno odvzamejo svoje pooblastilo priznani organizaciji zaradi resnega ogrožanja varnosti ali okolja .
(18) Member States should nevertheless be left with the possibility of suspending their authorisation of a recognised organisation for reasons of serious danger to safety or the environment.
Komisija bi se morala v skladu s postopkom komitologije nemudoma odločiti, ali je treba v ta namen katerega od nacionalnih ukrepov ovreči.
The Commission should decide without delay, in accordance with the committee procedure, whether any nati onal measure to the above effect should be overruled.
Namen te direktive je:
The purpose of this D irective is:
(a) zagotoviti, da države članice učinkovito in dosledno izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti kot države zastave v skladu z mednarodnimi konvencijami;
(a) to ensure that Member States effectively and consistently discharge their obligations as flag States in accordance with international conventions;
Ta direktiva določa ukrepe, ki jih morajo upoštevati države članice v odnosih z organizacijami, ki so zadolžene za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij in za izdajanje spričeval za ladje glede usklajenosti z mednarodnimi konvencijami o varnosti na morju in preprečevanju onesnaževanja morja, pri čemer spodbujajo cilj svobode opravljanja storitev.
This Directive establishes measures to be followed by the Member States in their relationship with organisations entrusted with the inspection, survey and certification of ships for compliance with the international conventions on safety at sea and prevention of marine pollution, while furthering the objective of freedom to provide services.
To vključuje razvoj in izvajanje varnostnih zahtev za trup, strojno opremo in električne ter nadzorne naprave ladij, ki sodijo na področje uporabe mednarodnih konvencij.
This includes the development and implementation of safety requirements for hull, machinery and electrical and control installations of ships falling under the scope of the international conventions.
(b) določiti ukrepe, ki jih morajo upoštevati države članice v odnosih z organizacijami, ki so priznane, da skrbijo za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij in za izdajanje spričeval za ladje glede usklajenosti z mednarodnimi konvencijami o varnosti na morju in preprečevanju onesnaževanja morja, pri čemer spodbujajo cilj svobode opravljanja storitev.
(b) to establish measures to be followed by the Member States in their relationship with recognised organisations which they have entrusted with the inspection, survey and certification of ships for compliance with the international conventions on safety at sea and prevention of marine pollution, while furthering the objective of freedom to provide services.
Proces vključuje razvoj in izvajanje varnostnih zahtev za trup, strojno opremo in električne, radiotelefonske ter nadzorne naprave ladij, ki sodijo na področje uporabe omenjenih mednarodnih konvencij.
This process includes the development and implementation of safety requirements for hull, machinery and electrical , radiotelephone, and control installations of ships falling under the scope of those international conventions.
c) "tehnični nadzor in pregled" pomenijo tehnične nadzore in preglede, ki so obvezni na podlagi mednarodnih konvencij;
(c) 'inspections and surveys' means inspections and surveys that are mandatory under the international conventions;
(c) "tehnični nadzor in pregled" pomenijo tehnične nadzore in preglede, ki so obvezni na podlagi mednarodnih konvencij ter te direktive in drugih direktiv Skupnosti, povezanih s pomorsko varnostjo ;
(c) 'inspections and surveys' means inspections and surveys that are mandatory under the international conventions and under this Directive and other Community legislation concerning maritime safety ;
Glej prvo obravnavo, predlog spremembe 21.
See first-reading Amendment 21.
(d) "mednarodne konvencije" pomenijo Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 1. novembra 1974 o varstvu človeškega življenja na morju (SOLAS 74), z izjemo poglavja XI-2 njene Priloge, Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 5. aprila 1966 o tovornih črtah in Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 2. novembra 1973 o preprečevanju onesnaženja morja z ladij (Marpol), skupaj s protokoli in spremembami teh konvencij ter pripadajočimi kodeksi obveznega značaja v vseh državah članicah, in sicer v najnovejših različicah;
(d) 'international conventions' means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1 November 1974, (SOLAS 74) with the exception of chapter XI ‑2 of the Annex thereto, the International Convention of Load Lines of 5 April 1966 and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 2 November 1973 (Marpol), together with the protocols and amendments thereto, and the related codes of mandatory status in all Member States, in their up-to-date version;
(d) "mednarodne konvencije" (d) pomenijo Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 1. novembra 1974 o varstvu človeškega življenja na morju (SOLAS 74), Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 5. aprila 1966 o tovornih črtah in Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 2. novembra 1973 o preprečevanju onesnaženja morja z ladij (Marpol), Mednarodno konvencijo o izmeritvi ladij (Tonnage 69) iz leta 1969, Mednarodno konvencijo o pravilih o izobraževanju pomorščakov in izdajanju spričeval (STCW 1978) iz leta 1978 in Konvencijo o mednarodnih pravilih za izogibanje trčenju na morju (Colreg 72) iz leta 1972, skupaj s protokoli in spremembami teh konvencij ter pripadajočimi kodeksi obveznega značaja v vseh državah članicah, in sicer v najnovejših različicah;
(d) 'international conventions' means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1 November 1974, (SOLAS 74) the International Convention of Load Lines of 5 April 1966, the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 2 November 1973 (Marpol), the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 (Tonnage 69), the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW 1978), and the Convention on International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREG 72), together with the protocols and amendments thereto, and the related codes of mandatory status in all Member States, in their up-to-date version;
Člen 2 – točka d a (novo)
Article 2 – point d a (new)
Predlog spremembe (da) „Kodeks držav zastave” pomeni 1. in 2. del „Kodeksa za izvajanje obveznih instrumentov IMO” , ki ga je sprejela IMO z Resolucijo Skupščine A.996(25) z dne 29. novembra 2007, v najnovejši različici;
(da) “ Flag State Code” means parts 1 and 2 of the “Code for the Implementation of Mandatory IMO Instruments”, adopted by the IMO through Assembly Resolution A.996(25) on 29 November 2007, in its up-to-date version;
(db) „uprava” pomeni pristojne organe države članice, pod zastavo katere pluje ladja, vključno s tistimi oddelki, agencijami, organi, ki so odgovorni za izvajanje določb o državah zastave iz konvencij IMO;
(db) 'administration' means the competent authorities of the Member State whose flag the ship is flying, including departments, agencies, and bodies, in charge of the implementation of the F lag State - related provisions of the IMO Conventions;
Člen 2 – točka k
Article 2 – point k
k) „klasifikacijsko spričevalo“ pomeni dokument, ki ga izda priznana organizacija ter potrjuje primernost ladje za določeno uporabo ali storitev v skladu s pravili in predpisi, ki jih določi in objavi zadevna priznana organizacija;
(k) “ class certificate” means a document issued by a recognised organisation certifying the fitness of a ship for a particular use or service in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down and made public by that recognised organisation;
(Ne zadeva slovenske različice.)
The purpose of this amendment is to reinstate Parliament’s position at first reading.
Ob prevzemanju odgovornosti in obveznosti v okviru mednarodnih konvencij države članice zagotovijo, da lahko njihove pristojne uprave zagotovijo primerno uveljavitev določb mednarodnih konvencij , zlasti v zvezi z tehničnim nadzorom in pregledom ladij ter izdajo predpisanih spričeval in spričeval o oprostitvi, kot to določajo mednarodne konvencije .
In assuming their responsibilities and obligations under the international conventions, Member States shall ensure that their competent administrations can ensure appropriate enforcement of the provisions thereof, in particular with regard to the inspection and survey of ships and the issue of statutory certificates and exemption certificates as provided for by the international conventions.