natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V Bruslju, 4. maja 2009
Brussels, 4 May 2009
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, še posebej s točko 4, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala dne 25. marca 2009, da bi med drugim proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party, consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, met on 25 March 2009 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je imela na voljo 22 jezikovnih različic predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, saj je bila to osnovna verzija obravnavanega besedila. preučila predlog uredbe Sveta, ki kodificira Uredbo Sveta št. 79/65/EGS z dne 15. junija 1965 o vzpostavitvi mreže za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov o dohodkih in poslovanju kmetijskih gospodarstev v Evropski gospodarski skupnosti, ter prišla do naslednjih soglasnih ugotovitev:
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal 22 language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a Council Regulation codifying Regulation No 79/65/EEC of the Council of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
1) V različici predloga kodifikacije v angleškem jeziku je treba v členu 2(d) besedilo spremeniti, da se glasi „ za izbor poročevalskih kmetij “.
1) In the English language version of the codification proposal, in Article 2(d) the words " with a view to the selection or returning holdings " should be adapted so as to read " with a view to the selection of returning holdings ".
2) Besedilo člena 5(1) je treba spremeniti, da bi se glasilo: „ Področje spremljanja iz člena 1(2)(a) zajema kmetijska gospodarstva, katerih ekonomska velikost je enaka ali večja od praga, izraženega v eurih, ki ustreza eni izmed spodnjih mej razredov, kot jih določa tipologija Skupnosti “.
2) The wording of Article 5(1) should be adapted so as to read as follows " The field of the survey referred to in Article 1(2)(a) shall cover the agricultural holdings having an economic size equal to, or greater than, a threshold expressed in Euro corresponding to one of the lower limits of the economic size classes as defined in the Community typology ".
3) V členu 18(1) je treba črtati besedilo „ ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic in mu predseduje predstavnik Komisije “.
3) In Article 18(1), the words " consisting of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the Commission representative " should be removed.
4) Črtati je treba celotno besedilo odstavka 3 člena 18.
4) The entire wording of paragraph 3 of Article 18 should be removed.
Zaradi te spremembe je treba preštevilčiti tri odstavke istega člena, ki sledijo.
As a consequence of that change, the three following paragraphs of the same article should be renumbered.
Mreža za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov o dohodkih in poslovanju kmetijskih gospodarstev v Evropski skupnosti (kodificirana različica)
Network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings (codified version)
o spremenjenem predlogu Direktive Sveta o čistopasemskem plemenskem govedu (kodificirana različica)
on the amended proposal for a Council directive on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (codified version)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2009)0235 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2009)0235 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 37 in 94 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0045/2009 ),
– having regard to Articles 37 and 94 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0045/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7‑0032/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0032/2009 ),
Predlog Direktive Sveta o čistopasemskem plemenskem govedu (kodificirana različica)
Proposal for a Council directive on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (codified version)
KOM(2009)0235 z dne 20.5.2009 – 2006/0250(CNS)
COM(2009)235 of 20.5.2009 – 2006/0250(CNS)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil, zlasti njegovo 4. točko, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo ustrezne pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 28. maja in 25. junija 2009, da bi med drugim pregledala omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predstavila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party, consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, met on 28 May and 25 June 2009 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je imela na voljo 22 jezikovnih različic predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na osnovi angleške različice, ki je bila osnovna jezikovna različica za obravnavano besedilo. pregledala spremenjeni Predlog direktive Sveta, ki kodificira Direktivo Sveta 77/504/EGS z dne 25. julija 1977, o čistopasemskem plemenskem govedu ter soglasno prišla do naslednjih ugotovitev:
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal 22 language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the amended proposal for a Council directive codifying Council Directive 77/504/EEC of 25 July 1977 on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
1) V prvi navedbi sklicevanja je treba sklic na člena „37 in 94” nadomestiti s sklicem na člen „37” .
1) In the first citation, the reference made to " Articles 37 and 94 " should be replaced by a reference to " Article 37 ".
2) Besedilo uvodne izjave 4 (ki ustreza uvodni izjavi 3 v Direktivi 94/28/ES) in uvodne izjave 5 (ki ustreza uvodni izjavi 5 Direktive 94/28/ES) je treba črtati iz preambule kodificirane različice Direktive 77/504/EGS.
2) The texts of Recital 4 (corresponding to Recital 3 of Directive 94/28/EC) and of Recital 5 (corresponding to Recital 5 of Directive 94/28/EC) should be removed from the preamble to the codified version of Directive 77/504/EEC.
Uvodne izjave, ki so v predlogu kodifikacije trenutno oštevilčene s 6, 7 in 8, bi bilo treba preštevilčiti v 4, 5 in 6.
Recitals currently numbered 6, 7 and 8 in the codification proposal should be renumbered 4, 5 and 6.
o spremenjenem predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu delavcev pred tveganji zaradi izpostavljenosti azbestu pri delu (kodificirana različica)
on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work (codified version)
večina oddanih glasov za odobritev skupnega besedila
majority of the votes cast, to approv e the joint text
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA, SVETA IN KOMISIJE 6
ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIV E WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION 6
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0071 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0071 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 137(2) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C7‑0206/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 137(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0206/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7‑0033/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7‑0033/2009 ),
Spremenjeni predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu delavcev pred tveganji zaradi izpostavljenosti azbestu pri delu (kodificirana različica)
Amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work (codified version)
KOM(2009)0071 z dne 22.4.2009 – 2006/0222(COD)
COM(2009)0071 of 22.4.2009 – 2006/0222(COD)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil in zlasti s 4. točko tega sporazuma, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo predstavniki pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala 25. februarja in 25. marca 2009, da bi med drugim preučila omenjeni predlog Komisije.
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts, and in particular to Point 4, the Consultative Working Party, consisting of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, met on 25 February and 25 March 2009 to consider, among others, the above proposal submitted by the Commission.
Pri pregledu
Having considered
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo 22 uradnih jezikovnih različic, svoje delo pa je opravila na podlagi francoske različice, saj je bila francoščina izvorni jezik delovnega dokumenta. spremenjenega predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za kodifikacijo Direktive Sveta 83/477/EGS z dne 19. septembra 1983 o varstvu delavcev pred tveganji zaradi izpostavljenosti azbestu pri delu (druga posebna direktiva v skladu s členom 8 Direktive 80/1107/EGS) je skupina soglasno prišla do naslednjih ugotovitev.
The Working Party had at its disposal 22 language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the French version, being the original version of the working document. the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and the Council codifying Council Directive 83/477/EEC of 19 September 1983 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work (second individual directive within the meaning of Article 8 of Directive 80/1107/EEC), the Working Party established by common accord as follows.
1) Besedilo uvodne izjave 11 bi bilo treba deloma spremeniti: " Čeprav še ni bilo mogoče opredeliti praga izpostavljenosti, pod katerim azbest ne predstavlja tveganja za raka, bi bilo treba poklicno izpostavljenost delavcev azbestu zmanjšati na minimum".
(1) The text of Recital 11 should be changed to read as follows: ‘Even though it has not yet been possible to identify t he exposure threshold below which asbestos does not involve a cancer risk, the occupational exposure of workers to asbestos should be reduced to a minimum. ’
Med referenčnimi navedbami pred to uvodno izjavo bi bilo treba črtati referenco v uvodni izjavi 6 direktive 91/382/EGS.
In the reference box preceding this recital, the reference to Recital 6 of Directive 91/382/EEC should be deleted.
2) V členu 22 bi bilo treba črtati odstavek 2.
(2) Paragraph 2 of Article 22 should be deleted.
PENNERA J.-C. PIRIS C.F. DURAND pravni
C. PENNERA J.-C. PIRIS C.-F.DURAND
svetovalec pravni svetovalec generalni direktor
Jurisconsult Jurisconsult Director-General
o predlogu Odločbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za spremljanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda
on the proposal for a Council decision on the establishment of an evaluation mechanism to monitor the application of the Schengen acquis
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2009)0105 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2009)0105 ) ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) ter členov 30 in 31 Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0111/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) and Articles 30 and 31 of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0111/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7‑0035/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7‑0035/2009 ),
Oblikovanje schengenskega območja v poznih osemdesetih in zgodnjih devetdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja je bil eden večjih dosežkov v evropski zgodovini, ki sta ga zaznamovala odprava nadzora na skupnih mejah in uvedba prostega gibanja na tem območju.
The creation of the Schengen area in the late 1980s and early 1990s was one of European history's greatest successes, characterised by the absence of controls at shared borders between participating countries and the introduction of freedom of movement within this area.
Hkrati so bili izvedeni tudi različni izravnalni ukrepi, zlasti okrepitev nadzora na zunanjih mejah ter policijskega, carinskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja, vzpostavitev schengenskega informacijskega sistema in tako naprej.
At the same time various compensatory measures were implemented, in particular the strengthening of controls at external borders and of police, customs and judicial cooperation, the creation of the Schengen Information System, etc.
Za odpravo nadzora na notranjih mejah mora med državami članicami prevladovati popolno medsebojno zaupanje v njihove sposobnosti, da bodo v celoti uporabljale potrebne spremljevalne ukrepe.
The abolition of internal border controls requires full mutual trust between the Member States in their capacity to fully implement the accompanying measures allowing those controls to be lifted.
Varnost na schengenskem območju je odvisna od tega, kako strogo in učinkovito posamezne države članice izvajajo nadzor na zunanjih mejah, ter kakovosti in hitrosti izmenjave informacij prek schengenskega informacijskega sistema.
Indeed, the security of the Schengen area depends on the rigour and effectiveness with which each Member State carries out controls at its external borders, as well as on the quality and speed with which information is exchanged through the SIS.
Nestanovitno in neprimerno delovanje katerega koli od naštetih elementov pomeni tveganje za varnost Evropske unije in učinkovitost schengenskega območja.
The fragility or inadequate functioning of any of these elements poses a risk to the security of the European Union and to the efficiency of the Schengen area.
Leta 1998 je bil ustanovljen stalni odbor
In 1998 a Standing Committee
SCH/Com-ex (98) 26 fin. z nalogo, da države članice oceni v dveh ločenih stopnjah:
SCH/Com-ex(98) 26 fin. was created with the task of assessing the Member States at two separate stages:
– začetek učinkovanja: odbor je moral preveriti, ali so bili izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za uporabo schengenskega pravnega reda za odpravo mejnega nadzora;
- putting into effect: the committee was to verify whether all the preconditions for application of the Schengen acquis had been met so that border controls could be lifted;
– izvajanje: po odpravi nadzora na notranjih mejah je bilo treba vzpostavljeno medsebojno zaupanje ohranjevati in krepiti, zato je odbor preverjal pravilno uporabo schengenskega pravnega reda v državah članicah.
- implementation: the mutual trust established when internal controls were lifted was to be maintained and strengthened through assessments of the way in which the Schengen acquis was being applied by the Member States.
PODROČJE UPORABE PREDLOGA:
SCOPE OF THE PROPOSAL
Predlog nikakor ne spreminja prvega dela mandata, saj delovna skupina za schengensko evalvacijo ohranja svoje pristojnosti za ocenjevanje pred začetkom učinkovanja, kar je osnova za pomemben odnos medsebojnega zaupanja.
The present proposal does not change the first part of the mandate in any way, since the Schengen Evaluation Working Group retains its responsibilities in the field of evaluation before putting into effect, which provides the basis for the vital relationship of mutual trust.
Pozornost je zato namenjena drugemu delu mandata, to je preverjanju pravilne uporabe pravnega reda po odpravi notranjih meja, poleg tega pa predlog določa, da se Komisiji zaupajo vse naloge, ki jih izvaja delovna skupina za schengensko evalvacijo.
It therefore focuses on the second part of the mandate, i.e. verification that the acquis is being correctly applied following the lifting of internal border controls, and lays down that the Commission is to be entrusted with all the tasks carried out by the Schengen Evaluation Working Group.
Cilj je učinkovitejši schengenski ocenjevalni mehanizem, ki bo zagotavljal pregledno, učinkovito in skladno izvajanje schengenskega pravnega reda.
The aim is to make the Schengen evaluation mechanism more efficient, ensuring the transparent, effective and consistent implementation of the Schengen acquis.
Namen predloga je tudi omogočiti odziv na spremembe v pravnem položaju po vključitvi schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir EU, ko vsaka določba pravnega reda dobi pravno podlago v okviru prvega ali tretjega stebra.
The proposal further aims to respond to the changes in the legal situation following the integration of the Schengen acquis into the EU framework, when each provision of the acquis received a legal basis under the first or the third pillar.
Predlog vzpostavlja pravni okvir za ocenjevanje in pravilno izvajanje tistih elementov schengenskega pravnega reda, ki so del prava Skupnosti, skupaj s predlogom uredbe (prvi steber).
It establishes a legal framework for evaluating the correct implementation of those elements of the Schengen acquis that form part of Community law, in conjunction with the proposal for a regulation (first pillar).
Po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe (to bi lahko bilo kmalu) bo ta cilj brez pomena, saj bo odpravljena struktura stebrov Skupnosti, tako da bo nov pravni položaj popolnoma drugačen.
However, when the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force (which could be very soon), this objective will no longer apply, since the new legal situation will be completely different as a result of the abolition of the Community's pillar structure.
Nujno je treba vzpostaviti schengenski ocenjevalni mehanizem, ki bo skladen z združitvijo nalog, ki so zdaj razdeljene med prvi in tretji steber.
It is crucial that a Schengen evaluation mechanism is created that is consistent with the consolidation of tasks currently divided between the first and the third pillar.
Poročevalec, ki je bil ob koncu preteklega parlamentarnega mandata imenovan za pripravo predlogov o vzpostavitvi schengenskega ocenjevalnega mehanizma, je zaprosil za mnenje pravne službe
When your rapporteur was appointed for the proposals relating to the creation of a Schengen evaluation mechanism at the end of the previous parliamentary term, he requested an opinion from the Legal Service
SJ-0212/09, D(2009)20022. , da bi preveril, ali je Komisija izbrala najprimernejšo pravno podlago za te predloge.
SJ-0212/09, D(2009)20022. verifying whether the legal basis chosen by the Commission was the most appropriate basis for these proposals.
Ob upoštevanju tega mnenja je mogoče sklepati dvoje:
In the light of this opinion, two conclusions may be reached:
– pravna podlaga iz predloga uredbe o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe pravnega reda Skupnosti, tj. člen 66 Pogodbe ES, se zdi pravilna, ob upoštevanju predloženih argumentov, obvezno pa je tudi posvetovanje s Parlamentom;
- the legal basis referred to in the proposal for a regulation on the establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify the application of the acquis communautaire, i.e. Article 66 of the EC Treaty, appears to be correct, bearing in mind the arguments put forward, and Parliament is to be consulted ;
– ker je namen mehanizma med drugim ocenjevanje delovanja schengenskega informacijskega sistema, vizumskega informacijskega sistema, zakonika o schengenskih mejah in vizumskega zakonika, je ta cilj mogoče doseči tudi s spremembo ustreznih uredb.
- however, since the purpose of this mechanism is to evaluate the operation of the SIS, the VIS, the Schengen Borders Code and the Visa Code, inter alia, the same objective could be achieved by amending the corresponding regulations.
V tem primeru bi tudi za ustrezne predloge sprememb veljal postopek soodločanja , saj so bili vsi instrumenti sprejeti v skladu s tem postopkom.
In that case, since all the instruments were adopted under the codecision procedure, the respective amendments would also be subject to codecision .
STALIŠČE POROČEVALCA
RAPPORTEUR'S POSITION
Zelo pomembno je, da bo vzpostavljen preprost, delujoč, učinkovit in pregleden ocenjevalni mehanizem, ki bo omogočil, da bo schengensko območje ostalo območje prostega gibanja, hkrati pa je treba medvladni okvir za schengensko ocenjevanje prilagoditi okviru EU.
It is vital that there should be a simple, effective, efficient and transparent evaluation mechanism that will enable the Schengen area to be preserved as an area of free movement, whilst at the same time it is indispensable to adapt the intergovernmental framework for Schengen evaluation to the EU framework.
V okviru haaškega programa je bila Komisija povabljena, naj predloži predlog za dopolnitev obstoječega schengenskega ocenjevalnega mehanizma.
Under the Hague Programme the Commission was invited to submit a proposal to supplement the existing Schengen evaluation mechanism.
Sedanji predlogi (ki ne spreminjajo pravil v zvezi s prvim delom mandata) so v bistvu omejeni (v zvezi z drugim delom mandata) na prevzemanje najnovejših izboljšav obstoječih ocenjevalnih mehanizmov
In substance, the present proposals (which make no changes to the rules relating to the first part of the mandate) are restricted (with regard to the second part of the mandate) to incorporating the recent improvements made to the existing evaluation mechanism
Glej program schengenske evalvacije za obdobje 2008–2013. in samo vstavljajo novo določbo v osnutek uredbe glede možnosti nenapovedanih obiskov, čeprav brez vidnega razloga takšni obiski niso predvideni v osnutku odločbe.
See the 'Schengen Evaluation Programme 2008-2013'. , and merely insert a new provision in the draft regulation regarding the possibility of making unannounced visits, although for no apparent reason such visits are not envisaged in the draft decision.
Vseeno pa ti predlogi brez pravih dokazov o dodani vrednosti v celoti prenašajo vlogo, ki jo ima trenutno Svet v zvezi z ocenjevalnimi mehanizmi, na Komisijo, tako da je mogoče le omejeno sodelovanje z državami članicami, Evropski parlament pa je zelo oddaljen od celotnega procesa.
Nevertheless, these proposals transfer the role currently played by the Council in connection with the evaluation mechanism to the Commission en bloc, providing for fairly limited forms of cooperation with the Member States and keeping the European Parliament at a distance from the entire process, without supplying any proof of added value.
Poročevalec je zaskrbljen, da bi popolna ločitev ocenjevalnih mehanizmov za vsak del mandata pomenila tveganje manjše učinkovitosti.
Your rapporteur is concerned that totally separating the evaluation mechanisms for each part of the mandate poses a risk of reduced efficiency.
Poleg tega je nujno treba ohraniti skladnost, se izogniti podvajanju prizadevanj in finančnih sredstev ter doseči dejansko nadgradnjo schengenskega ocenjevalnega mehanizma.
Moreover, it is essential to preserve consistency, avoid duplication of effort and financial resources and achieve a genuine 'upgrade' of the Schengen evaluation mechanism.