natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E. ker je dobro počutje živali eden, vendar ne edini dejavnik, ki prispeva k zdravju živali in je utemeljeno z etičnimi, socialnimi in ekonomskimi razlogi ter mora imeti trdne znanstvene temelje,
E. whereas animal welfare is one factor, but not the only one, which contributes to animal health and is justified on ethical, social and economic grounds and must be based on solid scientific foundations,
F. ker se trgovina pospešeno globalizira in ker se trgovina s proizvodi živalskega izvora povečuje tako znotraj EU kot tudi v mednarodnem okolju,
F. whereas trade is becoming increasingly globalised and the trade in animal products is on the increase, both within the EU and internationally,
G. ker je treba na področju zdravstvenega varstva živali usklajeno sodelovati na evropski in svetovni ravni,
G. whereas there is a need for coordinated cooperation on animal health issues at EU and global level,
H. ker učinkovitost ukrepov za zdravstveno varstvo živali ni odvisna zgolj od upravnih ukrepov, temveč tudi od informiranega in predanega sodelovanja med vsemi zadevnimi stranmi,
H. whereas the effectiveness of action on animal health depends not only on the administrative measures taken but also on informed and committed cooperation between all stakeholders,
I. ker se proti boleznim živali najuspešneje borimo, če preprečimo, da do njih sploh pride, v skladu z načeloma, da je bolje preprečiti kot zdraviti in da je zdravljenje boljše od nepotrebnega zakola,
I. whereas the best means of combating animal diseases is to prevent them from occurring in the first place, in accordance with the principles that 'prevention is better than cure' and 'cure is better than unnecessary culling',
J. ker ni razlike med proizvodi iz cepljenih živali (tudi kadar gre za izredna cepljenja) in proizvodi iz necepljenih živali, vendar trgi znotraj in zunaj EU lahko zavrnejo proizvode iz cepljenih živali (tudi kadar gre za izredna cepljenja), zaradi česar potrebujejo živinorejci in drugi subjekti ustrezno zagotovilo, da bodo trgi pripravljeni sprejeti takšne proizvode po običajnih cenah,
J. whereas there is no difference between the quality of products derived from (emergency) vaccinated animals and products derived from unvaccinated animals, but markets in and outside the EU may not accept products derived from (emergency) vaccinated animals and livestock farmers and other operators need sufficient guarantees that markets would be ready to receive those products without price cuts,
1. pozdravlja oblikovanje strateškega pristopa k politiki EU za zdravstveno varstvo živali in podpora splošne cilje in načela iz sporočila o strategiji za zdravstveno varstvo živali, ki bodo Evropski uniji omogočili, da bo okrepila zaščitne mehanizme in pripravljenost pred izbruhom novih kužnih bolezni živali;
Welcomes the development of a strategic approach to EU animal health policy and supports the overall aims, objectives and principles set out in the Animal Health Strategy Communication, which will enable the EU to reinforce its protection mechanisms and preparedness in the face of the onset of new epizootic diseases;
6. poudarja, da imajo kmetje, rejci in lastniki odločilno vlogo pri spremljanju, ohranjanju in spodbujanju zdravja domačih živali ter pri preprečevanju in odkrivanju bolezni;
Stresses that farmers, breeders and owners play an essential role in monitoring, maintaining and promoting the health of farm animals and in the prevention and detection of disease;
15. pozdravlja dejstvo, da strategija zajema zdravje vseh živali v EU, saj to vključuje tudi divje domače živali, ki niso izrecno omenjene, če obstaja tveganje, da bi lahko okužile druge živali ali ljudi;
Welcomes the fact that the strategy covers the health of all animals in the EU so that feral pets, which are not expressly referred to, are also covered if there is a risk that they may transmit diseases to other animals or to humans;
20. poudarja, da predlagana strategija lahko prinese pozitivne rezultate, če se bodo za financiranje posameznih ukrepov določili jasni in pregledni sistemi, ki pa jih v sporočilu Komisije ni; kritizira Komisijo, ker v svojem sporočilu ne navaja zahtev za financiranje svoje politike;
Points out that the proposed strategy can produce positive results if clear and transparent arrangements are laid down for the funding of the individual measures, something that the Commission Communication fails to do; criticises the Commission for making no reference to the funding requirements for its policy in its Communication;
22. opozarja, da je skupna politika zdravstvenega varstva živali ena najbolj integriranih politik EU in da se mora financirati večinoma iz proračuna Skupnosti, vendar pa to ne sme izključevati finančne odgovornosti držav članic in kmetov;
Draws attention to the fact that the common animal health policy is one of the most integrated EU policies and that most of its funding should be covered by the Community budget, which should not preclude the financial responsibility of the Member States and farmers;
26. opozarja na pomembnost usklajenosti ukrepov za zdravstveno varstvo živali po vsej EU in poziva Komisijo, naj bo pri usklajevanju bolj aktivna kot doslej;
Points to the importance of EU-wide coordination of animal health measures and calls on the Commission to play a more active coordinating role than it has done hitherto;
28. priznava ključni pomen profiliranja in kategoriziranja tveganj, vključno z določitvijo sprejemljive ravni tveganja za Skupnost in relativnih prednostnih nalog za ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganja; meni, da se je treba potruditi in jasno opredeliti razmere, v katerih je tveganje za bolezni večje in presega sprejemljivo raven, ter njihove posledice;
Acknowledges the crucial importance of risk profiling and categorisation, including the determination of an acceptable level of risk for the Community and of the relative priority for action to reduce the risk; believes that efforts must be made to define clearly the situations in which the risk of disease is heightened and exceeds the acceptable level, as well as the consequences thereof;
32. meni, da je treba upoštevati tudi dejstvo, da so globalizacija, podnebne spremembe in premikanje ljudi dejavniki, ki spodbujajo širjenje bolezni živali, zaradi česar jih je težje obvladovati;
Believes that it is also necessary to take into consideration the fact that globalisation, climate change and the movement of people are factors favouring the spread of animal disease, which makes controlling them more difficult;
Steber 2 – Zakonodajni okvir EU
Pillar 2 – EU legal framework
37. meni, da bi zakonodajni okvir EU moral jasno in dovolj prožno določiti obveznosti lastnikov živali (tudi tistih živali, ki se vzrejajo za nekomercialne namene) v primeru tveganja, tako da obveznosti ne bodo vir neupravičenih sporov in nesoglasij; meni, da je omejevanje širjenja bolezni pri divjih živalih prav tako pomemben element v strategiji preprečevanja;
Takes the view that the EU legal framework should clearly, and in an appropriately flexible manner, lay down the obligations of owners of animals, including animals kept for non-commercial purposes, in risk situations, in such a way as not to give rise to unwarranted conflicts and disputes; believes that curbing diseases among wild animals is also a significant element of the preventive strategy;
40. v celoti deli mnenje, da sistem za nadomestila ne sme biti omejen na nadomestila za lastnike živali, ki so bile zaradi izbruha bolezni zaklane, temveč bi ga bilo treba združiti s spodbudami za preprečevanje tveganja v smislu znižanja prispevkov, ki jih kmetje plačujejo nacionalnim in regionalnim zdravstvenim skladom, v primeru izrednih ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganja, med katere spada tudi spodbujanje (izrednih) cepljenj namesto izkoreninjanja, to pa bi seveda pomenilo zagotovljen dohodek za lastnika (izredno) cepljene živine; meni, da bi isto načelo moralo veljati tudi za države članice kot spodbuda za znižanje ravni tveganja;
Fully shares the view that the compensation system should not be limited to providing compensation to owners of animals that are culled in response to the outbreak of disease, but should be combined with risk-prevention incentives, on the basis of reduction of contributions by farmers to national or regional animal health funds, in case they take extra risk reducing measures, which would also include promoting the use of (emergency) vaccination instead of stamping out, acknowledging that this would constitute income guarantees for the owner of the (emergency) vaccinated livestock; takes the view that the same principle should also apply to Member States, as an incentive to reduce risk levels;
41. poziva Komisijo, naj izpelje primerjalno analizo obstoječih kompenzacijskih sistemov v državah članicah in na podlagi te analize oblikuje okvirni model za vso EU; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi zakonodajni okvir za učinkovit sistem delitve stroškov v državah članicah, da bi zagotovili, da neposredne stroške izkoreninjenja bolezni živali sofinancira kmetijski sektor;
41 Calls on the Commission to carry out a comparative analysis of existing compensation systems in the Member States and on that basis to draw up an EU-wide framework model; calls on the Commission to create a legal framework for an efficient cost-sharing scheme in the Member States in order to ensure that the direct costs for eradicating an animal disease are also co-financed by the sector;
45. poudarja, da zakonodaja EU do velike mere že temelji na skladnosti s standardi OIE/Kodeksa, da je prizadevanje za popolno skladnost s temi standardi upravičeno in da se EU upravičeno zavzema za lastne standarde zdravstvenega varstva živali, da bi bili ti sprejeti na mendarodni ravni; zato in ob upoštevanju večje pogajalske moči EU podpira morebitno članstvo EU v Svetovni organizaciji za zdravje živali (OIE); poudarja tudi pomembnost varovanja vložka zainteresiranih strani na ravni OIE/Kodeksa;
Stresses that EU legislation is already based to a significant extent on compliance with OIE/Codex standards and that there is good reason to strive fully to comply with those standards and for the EU to promote its own animal health standards with a view to their adoption at international level; supports therefore, with a view to increase the EU's negotiating power within the OIE, a possible EU membership of the OIE; stresses, furthermore, the importance of safeguarding the input of stakeholders at OIE/Codex level;
47. pozdravlja predlagane korake k strategiji izvoza na ravni Skupnosti in poudarja, da mora Komisija storiti vse, da bi izboljšala dostop na trge tretjih držav in odstranila izvozne ovire;
Welcomes the proposed steps towards an export strategy at Community level and stresses that the Commission should make every effort to improve access to third-country markets and remove export barriers;
48. priznava, da je treba spodbujati ukrepe biološke varnosti na kmetijah; meni, da lahko ukrepi, kot je izolacija novih živali, pripeljanih na kmetijo, izolacija bolnih živali in ureditev premikanja ljudi, zelo vplivajo na omejitev širjenja bolezni;
Acknowledges the need to promote on-farm biosecurity measures; considers that measures such as the isolation of new animals brought to farms, the isolation of sick animals, and regulating the movement of people can have a major impact in restricting the spread of disease;
51. čaka na priznanje sistemov upravljanja kakovosti za kategorizacijo tveganja, povezanega z različnimi proizvodnimi sistemi; je prepričan, da je mogoče sisteme živinoreje, ki jih imajo potrošniki raje in ki prinašajo določene težave glede biološke varnosti (živinoreja na prostem), s primernim upravljanjem narediti varnejše;
Awaits the recognition of quality management systems for the categorisation of risk associated with different types of production systems; is convinced that stock-farming systems that are preferred by consumers and that pose certain problems with respect to biosecurity (free-range farming) can be made safer through appropriate management;
53. opozarja na velike razlike med državami članicami pri količini uničenega goveda zaradi nespoštovanja pravil EU o identifikaciji in registraciji; čaka na pojasnilo Komisije o teh razlikah v EU;
Points to the large differences among Member States in the amount of bovine animals destroyed as a result of non-compliance with the EU rules on identification and registration; awaits the explanation of the Commission for these differences within the EU;
57. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj vzpostavita mehanizme za zagotovitev boljše usklajenosti med carinskimi službami, veterinarskimi službami in organizatorji potovanj, da bi olajšali sodelovanje držav članic EU med sabo in s tretjimi državami;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to establish mechanisms to ensure better coordination between customs services, veterinary services and tour operators, in order to facilitate cooperation between Member States at EU level and with third countries;
59. poudarja, da je veterinarski nadzor pomemben v kriznih razmerah in za njihovo preprečevanje, saj zagotavlja zgodnje opozarjanje in hitro odkrivanje nevarnosti, povezanih z živalmi; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost vzpostavitve sistema revizij za kmetije, ki jih veterinarji ne obiskujejo redno;
Stresses the importance of veterinary surveillance in crisis situations and their prevention, as regards providing early warning and the prompt detection of animal-related threats; calls on the Commission, in this context, to examine the possible introduction of a system of farm audits for farms that are not regularly visited by veterinary professionals;
64. meni, da je pri ukrepanju ob tveganju, da pride do krize, bistveno zagotoviti, da bodo na razpolago strokovno znanje in humana sredstva za morebiten nujen zakol živali, da se živalim prihrani nepotrebno trpljenje, kar bo priznanje, da so živali živa, čuteča bitja;
Takes the view that, in connection with action in response to the threat of a crisis, it is essential to ensure the availability of specialist knowledge and of humane means of carrying out any necessary culling of animals that will spare them unnecessary suffering, in recognition of the fact that they are living, sentient beings;
Steber 4 – Znanost, inovacije in raziskave
Pillar 4 – Science, Innovation and Research
70. poudarja, da je komunikacija s potrošniki pomembna za zagotovitev, da razumejo načine širjenja bolezni živali ter njihov ogromni učinek in posledično pomen za oskrbo z varno hrano;
Stresses the importance of communicating with consumers in order to ensure that they understand the means by which animal diseases are spread and their enormous impact, and thus their significance, for the supply of safe food;
73. poziva Komisijo k zagotovitvi, da rezultat pogajanj STO ne bo ogrozil sposobnosti evropskih kmetov, da ohranjajo in izboljšajo standarde zdravja in dobrega počutja živali; meni, da je možnost, da se uvoženi proizvodi podredijo istim zahtevam, kot veljajo za evropske proizvode, pomemben dejavnik za zagotovitev uravnoteženega izida pogajanj;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the outcome of WTO negotiations does not undermine the ability of European farmers to maintain and enhance animal health and welfare standards; considers that the possibility of subjecting imported products to the same requirements as European products is a major factor in ensuring a balanced outcome to the negotiations;
75. je zaskrbljen ob vse več dokazih o povezavi med naraščajočo mednarodno trgovino z živimi pticami in perutninskimi proizvodi ter razvojem in širjenjem bolezni, kot je ptičja gripa; poziva Komisijo, naj te dokaze razišče in po potrebi pripravi predloge za ustrezno politiko;
Is concerned about the growing evidence that links the increasing international trade in live birds and poultry products with the development and spread of diseases such as avian flu; asks the Commission to investigate this evidence and bring forward appropriate policy proposals as necessary;
78. poziva Komisijo, naj zdravje in dobro počutje živali vključi v vse svoje razvojne programe, da bi dosegli usklajenost z notranjim pristopom in koristi teh politik razširili na partnerske države;
Calls on the Commission to integrate animal health and welfare in all its development programmes, in order to achieve consistency with the internal approach and extend the benefits of those policies to partner countries;
Predlog Komisije:
Commission proposal:
Sporočilo Komisije določa namene in cilje na visoki ravni, ki naj bi usmerjali razvoj politike na področju zdravstvenega varstva živali za obdobje do leta 2013.
The Commission Communication sets out high level aims and objectives to guide the development of animal health policy in the period up to 2013.
Strategija zajema zdravje vseh živali v EU, ki se vzrejajo za prehrano, kmetijstvo, raziskave, šport, kot hišni ljubljenčki, za zabavo in v živalskih vrtovih, ter divjih živali, kadar obstaja tveganje, da se z njih bolezen prenese na druge živali ali ljudi.
The strategy covers the health of all animals in the European Union kept for food, farming, research, sport, companionship, entertainment and in zoos, and wild animals where there is a risk of them transmitting disease to other animals or to humans.
Zajema tudi zdravje živali, ki se prevažajo v, iz ali znotraj EU.
It also covers the health of animals transported to, from and within the EU.
Specifični cilji te strategije so:
The specific objectives of the strategy are to;
− zagotavljati visoko raven javnega zdravja in varnosti hrane z zmanjševanjem biološkega in kemičnega tveganja za ljudi;
- ensure a high level of public health and food safety by minimising the incidence of biological and chemical risks to humans;
− spodbujati zdravstveno varstvo živali s preprečevanjem ali zmanjševanjem pojavljanja bolezni živali ter na ta način podpirati kmetijstvo in podeželsko skupnost;
- promote animal health by preventing or reducing the incidence of animal diseases, and in this way to support farming and the rural community;
− izboljšati gospodarsko rast, kohezijo in konkurenčnost z zagotavljanjem prostega pretoka blaga in sorazmernega premikanja živali; ter
- improve economic growth, cohesion and competitiveness, assuring free circulation of good and proportionate animal movements; and
− spodbujati kmetijske prakse in dobro počutje živali, ki preprečujejo nevarnosti, povezane z zdravjem živali, in zmanjšujejo učinke na okolje.
- promote farming practices and animal welfare which prevent animal health related threats and minimise environmental impacts.
Stališče poročevalca:
Rapporteur's position:
Strategija, ki jo je predstavila Komisija v sporočilu, ni sporna.
The strategy put forward in the Commission communication is non-controversial.
Vsi predlagani ukrepi so nujni in vredni podpore.
All the measures put forward are necessary and worthy of support.
Dokument je dober in je lahko koristna podlaga za ukrepanje, ki bo resnično izboljšalo zdravstveno varstvo živali.
It is good document which can form a useful basis for action to bring about a genuine improvement in animal health.
To poročilo se osredotoča na nekaj vprašanj, katerim sporočilo ne posveča dovolj pozornosti.
This report focuses on a few issues to which the communication fails to pay sufficient attention.
To vprašanje se obravnava preveč splošno.
This issue is covered in too general a fashion.
Predlagani ukrepi bodo povzročili stroške in treba je jasno določiti ustrezne sisteme financiranja.
The proposed measures will give rise to costs and appropriate funding arrangements need to be clearly laid down.
Drugo je večje tveganje, ki ga predstavljajo velika živinorejska kmetijska gospodarstva, ki uporabljajo industrijske metode reje.
Second: the greater risk posed by large livestock holdings at which industrial breeding methods are used.
Omejitev glede velikosti kmetij bi olajšala nadzor bolezni živali.
Animal disease control would be facilitated by restrictions on the size of farms.
Tretje je prevoz živali, ki vedno poveča tveganje za bolezni in bi ga morali uporabljati kar najmanj.
Third: animal transport, which always increases the risk of disease and should be kept to an absolute minimum.
Poročilo odločno podpira cepljenje kot temeljno sredstvo za preprečevanje bolezni.
The report strongly supports vaccination as a fundamental means of preventing disease.
4. poziva Komisijo k zagotovitvi, da rezultat pogajanj STO ne bo ogrozil sposobnosti evropskih kmetov, da ohranjajo in izboljšajo standarde zdravja in dobrega počutja živali; meni, da je možnost, da se uvoženi proizvodi podredijo istim zahtevam, kot veljajo za evropske proizvode, pomemben dejavnik za zagotovitev uravnoteženega izida pogajanj;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the outcome of WTO negotiations does not undermine the ability of European farmers to maintain and enhance animal health and welfare standards; considers that the possibility of subjecting imported products to the same requirements as European products is a major factor in ensuring a balanced outcome to the negotiations;
6. je zaskrbljen ob vse več dokazih o povezavi med naraščajočo mednarodno trgovino z živimi pticami in perutninskimi proizvodi ter razvojem in širjenjem bolezni, kot je ptičja gripa; poziva Komisijo, naj te dokaze razišče in po potrebi pripravi predloge za ustrezno politiko;
Is concerned about the growing evidence that links the increasing international trade in live birds and poultry products with the development and spread of diseases such as avian flu; asks the Commission to investigate this evidence and bring forward appropriate policy proposals as necessary;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj zdravje in dobro počutje živali vključi v vse svoje razvojne programe, da bi dosegli usklajenost z notranjim pristopom in koristi teh politik razširili na partnerske države;
Calls on the Commission to integrate animal health and welfare in all its development programmes, in order to achieve consistency with the internal approach and extend the benefits of these policies to partner countries;
Komisijo poziva k sklenitvi protokolov s področja veterine s potencialnimi izvoznimi trgi, na primer s kitajskim trgom.
Urges the Commission to conclude veterinary protocols with potential export markets, such as China's.
o predlogu Direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2003/109/ES, da se razširi njeno področje uporabe na upravičence do mednarodne zaščite
on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2003/109/EC to extend its scope to beneficiaries of international protection
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................14
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................14
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0298 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0298 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 63(3) in (4) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0196/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 63(3) and (4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0196/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6–0148/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and to the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0148/2008 ),
Predlog direktive – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a directive – amending act
(5) Glede na pravico upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite do prebivanja v državi članici, ki jim ni dodelila mednarodne zaščite, je treba zagotoviti, da so te države članice obveščene o ozadju zaščite zadevnih oseb, tako da lahko izpolnijo svoje obveznosti glede spoštovanja načela nevračanja.
(5) In view of the right of beneficiaries of international protection to reside in other Member States than the one which granted them international protection, it is necessary to ensure that these Member States are informed of the protection background of the persons concerned, so that they can comply with their obligations regarding the respect of the principle of non-refoulement.