natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
M. ker je bil pri zadnjih odkritih poskusih terorističnih dejanj, ki so jih odkrile obveščevalne službe, uporabljen tovor,
M. whereas the most recent terrorist plots uncovered by the intelligence services aimed to use cargo to carry out attacks,
N. ker so ustreznim varnostnim ukrepom podvrženi ne samo potniki, temveč tudi tovor in pošta ter ker mora tako ostati tudi v prihodnje,
N. whereas not only passengers but also cargo and mail are and must be subject to the appropriate security measures,
O. ker sta lahko tovor in pošta, ki se prevažata s potniškimi letali, tarča terorističnih napadov; ker je glede na to, da je varnostni nadzor tovora in pošte bistveno manj temeljit od nadzora potnikov, treba poostriti varnostne ukrepe za pošto in tovor, ki se nalagata na potniška letala,
O. whereas cargo and mail loaded on to passenger planes present a target for terrorist attacks; whereas, given that the level of security for cargo and mail is much lower than for passengers, security measures must be tightened for mail and cargo which is loaded on to passenger planes,
P. ker varnostni ukrepi ne zadevajo samo letališč, ampak celotno dobavno verigo,
P. whereas security measures concern not only airports but the entire supply chain,
Q. ker imajo poštni operaterji pri upravljanju izmenjav pošte in paketov pomembno vlogo na področju varovanja v letalstvu ter so, v skladu z evropsko zakonodajo, vložili precejšnje količine denarja in uvedli nove tehnologije, da bi zagotovili skladnost z mednarodnimi in evropskimi varnostnimi standardi,
Q. whereas postal operators play an important role in the field of aviation security in managing mail and parcels, and whereas, pursuant to European legislation, they have invested significant sums of money and introduced new technologies to guarantee compliance with international and European security standards,
R. ker je za zagotovitev visoke stopnje zaščite in hkratno preprečitev zaporednih preverjanj potnikov, s posledičnimi omejitvami in dodatnimi stroški, potrebno mednarodno usklajevanje ukrepov za varovanje v letalstvu,
R. whereas international coordination on aviation security measures is needed in order to guarantee a high level of protection, whilst avoiding a situation where passengers are subjected to successive checks, with the restrictions and additional costs these entail,
Usposabljanje varnostnega osebja
Training of security staff
S. ker je začetno in nadaljevalno usposabljanje varnostnega osebja bistveno za zagotavljanje visoke stopnje varovanja v letalstvu, ki mora biti združljivo z načinom obravnave potnikov, ki ohranja dostojanstvo posameznikov in varuje njihove osebne podatke,
S. whereas initial and further training for security staff is crucial in order to guarantee a high level of aviation security, which must in turn be compatible with a way of treating passengers that preserves their dignity as individuals and protects their personal data,
3. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost uporabe drugih metod za odkrivanje eksploziva, vključno s trdimi snovmi, na področju varovanja v letalstvu;
Calls on the Commission to research the use of other techniques for detecting explosives, including solidmaterials, in the field of aviation security;
5. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo učinkovito sodelovanje, upravljanje varovanja in izmenjavo informacij med vsemi zadevnimi organi in službami ter med organi in podjetji za zračni prevoz in varovanje tako na evropski kot na nacionalni ravni;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure effective cooperation, security management and exchange of information among all the authorities and services involved, and between the authorities and security and air transport undertakings, at both European and national level;
8. v zvezi s tem poudarja, da mora biti vsak protiteroristični ukrep popolnoma v skladu s temeljnimi pravicami in obveznostmi Evropske unije, ki so nujne v demokratični družbi, ter sorazmeren, nujno potreben, zakonsko predpisan in omejen na svoj specifičen namen;
Stresses, in that connection, that any counterterrorism measure should be fully consistent with fundamental rights and the obligations of the European Union, which are necessary in a democratic society, and must be proportionate, strictly necessary, prescribed by law and thus restricted to their specified purpose;
11. meni, da bi morali varnostni skenerji služiti za pospešitev pregledov na letališčih in zmanjšanje neprijetnosti za potnike, ter zato poziva Komisijo, naj ta vidik upošteva v svojih zakonodajnih predlogih;
Believes that security scanners should serve to speed up the pace and tempo of checks at airports and reduce inconvenience to passengers, and thus calls on the Commission to take this aspect into account in its proposed legislation;
Nujnost in sorazmernost
Necessity and proportionality
17. meni, da namestitev varnostnih skenerjev ali odločitev za njihovo nenamestitev spada na področje odgovornosti in svobode odločanja držav članic EU; vendar meni, da je treba bolje uskladiti uporabo skenerjev, da se lahko vzpostavi dosleden evropski prostor za varnost v letalskem prometu;
Takes the view that the installation of security scanners, or the decision not to install them, falls within the responsibility and freedom of decision of the EU Member States; considers, however, that further harmonisation of the use of scanners is needed in order to create a coherent European aviation security area;
24. poziva Komisijo, naj v naslednjem okvirnem programu za raziskave preuči možnost uporabe tehnologije, ki je povsem neškodljiva za vse ljudi in ki hkrati zagotavlja varovanje v letalskem prometu;
Calls on the Commission to examine the possibility, under the next research framework programme, of using technology that is completely harmless to all members of the public and which at the same time guarantees aviation security;
Slikanje telesa
Body images
33. opozarja, da mora biti uporaba varnostnih skenerjev skladna z Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov;
Recalls that the use of security scanners must comply with Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data;
Informacije za skenirane osebe
Information for people scanned
Obravnava skeniranih oseb
Treatment of people scanned
38. želi spomniti na svoje stališče z dne 5. maja 2010 o pristojbinah za varovanje v letalstvu;
Recalls its position of 5 May 2010 on aviation security charges;
Prepoved tekočin, aerosolov in gelov
Ban on liquids, aerosols and gels (LAG)
43. poziva države članice in letališča, naj sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovijo pravočasno razpoložljivost ustrezne tehnologije, da predvidena odprava prepovedi prenašanja tekočin ne bi ogrozila varnosti;
Invites Member States and airports to take all necessary action to ensure that adequate technology is available in good time so that the scheduled end of the ban on carrying liquids does not have the effect of undermining security;
49. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj okrepijo preglede letalskega tovora in nadzor nad njim, vključno s preverjanjem pooblaščenih uradnikov in znanih pošiljateljev; poudarja, da je v ta namen treba zagotoviti večje število inšpektorjev;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen screening and inspections concerning air cargo, including those relating to the validation of regulated agents for known consignors; stresses the need, to this end, to have more inspectors available at national level;
53. poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga usklajen sistem za usposabljanje in nadaljnje usposabljanje varnostnega osebja v zvezi s tovorom, da se bo upošteval najnovejši tehnični razvoj na področju varnosti;
Calls on the Commission to propose a harmonised system for the initial and further training of security staff in relation to cargo, in order to remain abreast of the latest technical developments in the field of security;
Celosten pregled varovanja v letalstvu
An integral view of aviation security
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi varnostnih skenerjev, ki je bilo prvotni predmet tega poročila o varovanju v letalstvu, so izpodrinila kasnejša dogajanja.
The communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the use of security scanners that was the initial subject of this report on aviation security has been superseded by subsequent events.
Zaporedne teroristične grožnje, najprej v Združenem kraljestvu, kjer so na tovornem letalu našli paket z eksplozivom, in nato še v Grčiji, kjer je grška policija prestregla več paketnih bomb, naslovljenih na osebo na visokem položaju in različna veleposlaništva v Atenah, so EU prisilile k sprejetju ukrepov, sorazmernih z na novo odkritimi tveganji.
Successive terrorist alerts, first in the United Kingdom, when an explosive package was found on a cargo plane, and subsequently in Greece, when the Greek police intercepted a number of parcel bombs addressed to a senior figure and various embassies in Athens, have obliged the EU to take measures in proportion to the new risks that have been detected.
Prav zato se Parlament loteva izziva analiziranja sprejetih ukrepov in predlaganja drugih, ko je to ustrezno, da se preprečijo tveganja na osnovi celostnega pregleda varovanja v civilnem letalstvu.
Parliament is therefore taking up the challenge of analysing the measures adopted and proposing others where appropriate, with a view to preventing risks on the basis of an integral view of civil aviation security.
Tako to poročilo obravnava varnostne skenerje, analizo sprejetih odločitev glede tekočin, aerosolov in gelov ter varnostne ukrepe za tovor in pošto.
This report thus addresses security scanners, an analysis of the decisions taken on liquids, aerosols and gels (LAG) and security measures for cargo and mail.
Boj proti terorizmu in varovanje v civilnem letalstvu
The fight against terrorism and civil aviation security
Živimo v času, ko globalizacija ni delovna hipoteza, ampak nesporno dejstvo.
We are living at a time when globalisation is not a working hypothesis but an incontrovertible fact.
V tem tesno povezanem svetu terorizem žal ni izoliran pojav, ki bi prizadel le nekaj držav, ostale pa pustil nedotaknjene.
In this interconnected world, terrorism is unfortunately not an isolated phenomenon affecting some countries and leaving others untouched.
V demokratični družbi nobena oblika terorizma ni uprvičena , kakor tudi ni upravičenih razlogov zanj.
Any form of terrorism is impossible to justify in a democratic society and there is no cause that might legitimise it.
Zato se pristojne demokratične institucije ne morejo izogniti odgovornosti, da sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev javne varnosti.
That being the case, the competent democratic institutions have an inescapable duty to take whatever measures are necessary to guarantee public safety.
Odločitve, sprejete iz varnostnih razlogov, pogosto pomenijo izgubo določenih svoboščin in neizogibno povzročijo neprijetnosti, težave in spremembo običajnih vzorcev vedenja.
Decisions taken on grounds of security often imply the loss of certain freedoms and inevitably entail inconvenience, disruption and a change in normal modes of behaviour.
V hierarhiji vrednot sodobnih družb varnosti žal pripada mesto vrednote, ki jo je treba ohraniti, saj ni samoumevna.
Sadly, in the hierarchy of values of modern societies, security is presented as a value that needs to be preserved because it is not guaranteed.
Demokratične družbe svojim predstavnikom v ustreznih institucijah dajejo nalogo, da jih ščitijo, vendar pa od njih istočasno zahtevajo, naj tega ne počno z vsemi možnimi sredstvi in za vsako ceno.
Democratic societies give their representatives in the relevant institutions a mandate to protect them, whilst at the same time asking that this should not be done by whatever means and at any price.
Evropski državljani zahtevajo, da se njihove temeljne pravice s sprejetjem varnostnih ukrepov ne zmanjšajo.
European citizens demand that the adoption of security measures should not curtail their fundamental rights.
Potreba po izboljšanju varovanja v civilnem letalstvu
The need to improve civil aviation security
Varovanje v civilnem letalstvu je nedvomno ena glavnih nalog Evropske unije.
Civil aviation security is doubtless one of the European Union's main concerns.
Od napadov 11. septembra 2001 dalje je bila pripravljena vrsta ukrepov, ki so opredeljeni v uredbah Skupnosti in katerih namen je preprečevati kakršne koli teroristične napade ali incidente, ki ogrožajo javno varnost, ter se jim izogibati.
Since the attacks of 11 September 2001 a series of measures have been drawn up, defined in Community regulations that seek to prevent and avoid any terrorist attack or incident that affects public safety.
Zakonodaja o varovanju v letalstvu se je torej razvijala, kot sledi:
Legislation on aviation security has thus developed as follows:
· po terorističnih napadih 11. septembra 2001 so bili postavljeni temelji za politiko Skupnosti, ki je predhodno ostajala na nacionalni ravni, in sprejeta je bila Uredba št. 2320/2002;
· following the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 the foundations were laid for a Community policy that had previously remained within the national domain, and Regulation No 2320/2002 was adopted;
· decembra 2001 je tako imenovani čeveljski bombaš poskušal skriti razstrelivo v pete svojih čevljev, kar je vodilo k določitvi posebnih ukrepov na evropski ravni za izboljšanje preverjanja obutve potnikov;
· in December 2001 the so-called shoe bomber attempted to hide explosives in the heels of his shoes, as a result of which specific measures were laid down at European level to improve checks on passengers' footwear;
· avgusta leta 2006 je bila zaradi uporabe tekočega razstreliva v poskusih napada na več čezatlantskih letal uvedena takojšnja prepoved vnosa tekočin na krov letal;
· in August 2006 the use of liquid explosives in attempted attacks on several aircraft over the Atlantic led to an immediate ban on carrying liquids on board planes;
· na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj na področju varovanja v civilnem letalstvu je nastala potreba po posodobitvi Uredbe št. 2320/2002, sprejeta pa je bila tudi osnova za evropsko zakonodajo o varovanju civilnega letalstva, Uredba 300/2008.
· in the light of accumulated experience in the field of civil aviation security it became necessary to update Regulation No 2320/2002, and the basis for European legislation on civil aviation security, Regulation 300/2008, was adopted.
Slednja je poenostavila, poenotila in razjasnila obstoječa pravila;
That Regulation simplified, harmonised and clarified the existing rules;
· decembra 2009 je poskus terorističnega napada s pomočjo skritega eksploziva na letu med Amsterdamom in Detroitom opozoril na omejitve sedanjih sistemov za izvajanje pregledov za odkrivanje nekovinskih prepovedanih predmetov na evropskih letališčih.
· on 25 December 2009 an attempted terrorist attack on a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit using concealed explosives revealed the limitations of current systems for carrying out checks to detect non-metallic prohibited items at European airports.
Posledično so številne države začele izvajati teste ali pa so sprejele strožje varnostne ukrepe ter uvedle varnostne skenerje kot sredstvo za pregledovanje potnikov;
As a consequence, a number of countries started to carry out tests or adopted more stringent security measures and introduced security scanners as a means of screening passengers;
· nedavni napadi konec oktobra leta 2010, ko sta bila v Združenem kraljestvu in Dubaju odkrita paketa z eksplozivom, namenjena v Združene države, so vodili k strožjim varnostnim ukrepom za letalski tovor in k evropskemu akcijskemu načrtu za prihodnja leta.
· the recent attacks at the end of October 2010 when explosive packages were sent to the United States and discovered in the United Kingdom and Dubai led to more stringent security measures for air cargo and a European action plan for the coming years.
Če povzamemo, varovanje v civilnem letalstvu urejajo tri glavne uredbe:
To sum up, there are three main regulations on civil aviation security:
· Uredba (ES) št. 300/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih pravilih na področju varovanja civilnega letalstva;
· Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation security;
· Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 272/2009 o dopolnitvi skupnih osnovnih standardov na področju varovanja v civilnem letalstvu iz Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 300/2008;
· Commission Regulation (EC) No 272/2009 supplementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security laid down in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008;
· Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 185/2010 o določitvi ukrepov za izvajanje skupnih osnovnih standardov za varnost letalstva.
· Commission Regulation (EC) No 185/2010 laying down measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security.
Utemeljitev tega samoiniciativnega poročila
Justification for this own-initiative report
Ker zakonodajni okvir EU o varovanju v letalstvu določa seznam metod in tehnologij varnostnega pregledovanja in nadzora, med katerimi lahko izbirajo države članice in/ali letališča, bo treba sedanjo zakonodajo spremeniti tako, da bo ta seznam vključeval tudi varnostne skenerje (kar ne vpliva na možnost namestitve skenerjev v preskusne namene ali kot strožji varnostni ukrep).
Given that the EU's legislative framework on aviation security lays down the list of screening and control methods and technologies from which the Member States and/or airports are to choose, the current legislation will need to be amended to include security scanners on that list (without prejudice to the possibility of installing scanners for trial purposes or as a more stringent security measure).
Potem ko je Komisija leta 2008 Parlamentu predložila svoj osnutek uredbe, ki je vključeval varnostne skenerje kot eno od priznanih metod za varnostno pregledovanje oseb, je Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 23. oktobra 2008 podal kritično mnenje z utemeljitvijo, da vključitev varnostnih skenerjev ne ponuja nobene dodane vrednosti, ter izrazil pomisleke glede ohranjanja temeljnih pravic.
When the Commission submitted its draft regulation to Parliament in 2008, including security scanners as one of the recognised methods for screening persons, Parliament delivered a critical opinion in its resolution of 23 October 2008 on the grounds that including security scanners did not offer any added value and raised doubts regarding the preservation of fundamental rights.
Resolucija Parlamenta je poudarila učinek varnostnih skenerjev na človekove pravice, zasebnost, osebno dostojanstvo in varstvo podatkov ter pozvala k poglobljeni analizi razmer.
Parliament's resolution stressed the impact of security scanners on human rights, privacy, personal dignity and data protection and called for an in-depth analysis of the situation.
Komisija je v odgovor na resolucijo Parlamenta iz leta 2008 sedaj predložila sporočilo, v katerem deloma odpravlja pomisleke, ki jih je izrazil Parlament:
In response to Parliament's 2008 resolution, the Commission has now submitted a communication which goes some way to resolving the concerns expressed by Parliament:
· posvetovanje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov;
· consultation of the European Data Protection Supervisor;
· znanstvena in medicinska ocena učinka za zdravje;
· scientific and medical assessment of the health impact;
· najboljša možna ocena stroškov in koristi gospodarskega in trgovinskega učinka;
· cost-benefit assessment, as far as possible, of the economic and commercial impact;
· ocena učinka za temeljne pravice.
· assessment of the impact on fundamental rights.
Namen tega poročila je torej odgovoriti na poziv Komisije k razpravi in skupnemu razmisleku vseh treh institucij, da se doseže napredek pri tej skupni nalogi varstva evropskih državljanov.
The purpose of this report is therefore to respond to the Commission's appeal for discussion and joint consideration by the three institutions with a view to moving forward on this common task, which is to protect European citizens.
Poročevalec sporočilo Komisije ocenjuje pozitivno.
The rapporteur's assessment of the Commission communication is positive.
Meni, da je Komisija našla zadovoljiv način za odpravo upravičenih dvomov, izraženih s strani Parlamenta leta 2008.
He considers that the Commission has found a satisfactory way of resolving the reasonable doubts that Parliament raised in 2008.
Priporoča izvajanje usklajenih pravil glede pogojev delovanja in skupnih standardov za zmogljivost odkrivanja skenerjev po vsej EU.
The rapporteur recommends the implementation of harmonised rules across the EU regulating operating conditions and common standards for the detection performance of scanners.
Videti je, da so varnostni skenerji nove generacije primerno sredstvo za izboljšanje varnosti v zračnem prometu EU.
The new-generation security scanners appear to offer a suitable means of improving security in EU air transport.
Zagotavljajo dodano vrednost z vidika učinkovitosti varnostnih pregledov na letališčih EU in so tudi sorazmerni s tveganjem, ki se preprečuje z njihovo uporabo.
They provide added value in relation to the effectiveness of security screening at EU airports and are also proportional to the risk that is being averted.
Tekočine, aerosoli in geli
Liquids, aerosols and gels (LAG)
Ozadje situacije glede tekočin, aerosolov in gelov na evropskih letališčih
Background to th e situation regarding LAG at European airports
Od leta 2006 velja prepoved prenašanja tekočin, gelov in aerosolov, katerih količina presega 100 ml, v ročni prtljagi.
A ban on carrying liquids, gels and aerosols in hand luggage in amounts exceeding 100 ml has been in place since 2006.
Septembra leta 2007 je Parlament sprejel resolucijo P6-TA (2007) 0374 , v kateri je pozval Komisijo, da „kot prednostno pregleda in razveljavi Uredbo 1546/2006 , če ne bodo predstavljena dodatna odločilna dejstva“.
In September 2007 Parliament adopted resolution P6_TA(2007)0374 , in which it called on the Commission to 'review urgently and – if no further conclusive facts are brought forward – to repeal Regulation 1546/2006'.
Odtlej so različni poskusi za razveljavitev te prepovedi privedli do skupnega stališča vseh treh institucij, po katerem je treba prepoved prenašanja tekočin postopno opustiti.
Since then various attempts to end the ban have led to a common position of the three institutions whereby the ban on carrying liquids is to be phased out.
Trenutno stanje zakonodaje o tekočinah, aerosolih in gelih
The current state of legislation on LAG
Uredba Komisije (EU) 297/2010 z dne 9. aprila 2010 je odpravila omejitve glede tekočin, aerosolov in gelov ter oblikovala sistem za postopno opustitev prepovedi in prehod na sistem varnostnega pregledovanja za odkrivanje tekočih eksplozivov.
Commission Regulation (EU) 297/2010 of 9 April 2010 put an end to the restrictions on LAG and created a system for phasing out the ban and moving to a system of screening for liquid explosives .
Ta uredba zahteva, da letališča vzpostavijo učinkovit mehanizem, dokler ne namestijo zanesljivih detektorjev, kar je treba doseči do 29. aprila 2013.
That Regulation requires that airports should have an effective mechanism in place until they are in a position to install reliable detection equipment, an objective which is to be achieved by 29 April 2013.
Do tega datuma naj bi vsa letališča imela zmogljivosti za varnostno pregledovanje tekočin, aerosolov in gelov.
By that date, all airports should have the capability to screen liquids, aerosols and gels.
Faze postopne opustitve so sledeče:
The phases are as follows: