natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dokumenti iz točk 1 in 3 morajo biti obvezno priloženi vsakemu tovoru, da se lahko dokaže, ali gre za rabljeno napravo, ki se lahko ponovno uporabi, ali odpadno opremo.
It must be compulsory that the documents referred to in both point 1 and point accompany the load so that it can be determined whether the equipment in question is used and re-usable or waste.
Če se ne zagotovijo ustrezni dokumenti iz točk 1 in 3 ter embalaža, organi države članice domnevajo, da je predmet nevarna OEEO in da gre pri tovoru za nezakonito pošiljko.
In the absence of appropriate documentation required in point 1 and 3 and packaging, Member State authorities shall presume that an item is hazardous WEEE and presume that the load comprises an illegal shipment.
V takih okoliščinah se obvestijo ustrezni pristojni organi, tovor pa se obravnava v skladu s členoma 24 in 25 Uredbe o pošiljkah odpadkov.
In these circumstances the relevant competent authorities will be informed and the load will be dealt with in accordance with Articles 24 and 25 of the Waste Shipment Regulation.
V večini primerov morajo odgovorni za pošiljko odpadke na lastne stroške vrniti v državo odpreme in se jim lahko naloži kazenska sankcija.
In the majority of cases those responsible for the shipment will have to take back the waste to the country of dispatch at their own expense and may be liable to a criminal sanction.
V državah članicah, kjer morajo državni organi dokazati, da gre pri predmetih za OEEO in ne za električno in elektronsko opremo, bo nezagotovitev ustreznih dokumentov in embalaže verjetno povzročila precejšnje zamude pri nadaljnjem prevozu odpadkov, dokler se ne opravijo preiskave, ki so potrebne za določitev statusa predmetov, ki se pošiljajo.
In those Member States where the burden is on the state authorities to prove the items are WEEE rather than electrical and electronic equipment, absence of the appropriate documentation and packaging is likely to lead to significant delays to the onward transport of the waste whilst the necessary investigations are carried out to establish the status of the items being shipped.
Če se ne zagotovijo ustrezni dokumenti iz točk 1, 2 in 3 , ustrezna embalaža oziroma ustrezno zlaganje tovora, kar je odgovornost imetnika naprave, namenjene za pošiljko, organi države članice domnevajo, da je predmet nevarna OEEO in da gre pri tovoru za nezakonito pošiljko.
In the absence of the appropriate documentation required in points 1 and 3 , or of appropriate packaging or of appropriate stacking of the load , which it is the responsibility of the holder of an appliance intended for shipment to provide, Member State authorities shall presume that an item is hazardous WEEE and presume that the load comprises an illegal shipment.
Zagotoviti je treba ustrezno embalažo in zlaganje tovora.
Appropriate packaging and stacking needs to be provided/ensured.
Če katera od teh zahtev ni izpolnjena, bo štelo, da pošiljka vsebuje odpadno opremo.
If any of this is missing, the shipment shall be presumed to be waste.
To je pojasnilo, da mora dokazno breme nositi imetnik predmeta.
Clarification that the burden of proof rests with the holder of the object.
Ustrezne določbe o tem vsebujeta člena 24 in 25.
The relevant provisions are all contained in Articles 24 and 25.
OEEO je najhitreje rastoči tok odpadkov v EU, kar prinaša raznovrstne izzive.
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) represents the fastest-growing waste stream in the EU and we therefore face a range of challenges.
Če te opreme ne bomo pravilno obdelovali oziroma je ustrezno odstranili, bomo morali po eni strani reševati posledice za okolje in zdravje, po drugi strani pa je velika težava tudi izgubljanje surovin.
On the one hand we need to address the environmental and health consequences if this equipment is not properly treated and disposed of and, on the other, there is a serious problem of loss of raw materials.
Ključno vprašanje globaliziranega gospodarstva je učinkovita in inovativna uporaba energije, surovin in virov.
In a globalised economy, the efficient and innovative use of energy, materials and resources is a key issue.
Povečati zbiranje in ustrezno obdelavo v skladu z direktivo je torej velik izziv.
Stepping up the collection and proper treatment of this waste in accordance with the directive thus constitutes a major challenge.
Po oceni učinka, ki jo je izvedla Komisija
According to the Commission’s Impact Assessment
Ocena učinka, KOM (2008)810. , se zdaj zbere že 85 % elektronskih odpadkov.
Impact Assessment, COM (2008)810. , 85% of electronic waste is already being collected.
Če primerjamo zbrane količine s količino naprav, ki prihajajo na trg, jih bo kasneje 65 % spet zbranih.
A comparison of the quantity of waste equipment collected with the number of appliances coming onto the market yields the figure of 65% as the proportion of appliances sold which will subsequently be collected.
Navedeni podatki o količinah sicer niso bili sporočeni na uradna mesta in večinoma tudi ne ustrezno obdelani: zgolj 33 % odpadne opreme je bilo prijavljene ter zbrane in obdelane skladno z direktivo.
However, these quantities are not being reported to official registers and, indeed, much of the waste concerned is not being properly treated: only 33% of waste equipment is being officially reported, collected and treated in line with the directive’s stipulations.
Izziv tovrstne predelave je, kako ta delež povečati.
The challenge in the current review, therefore, is to increase these rates.
Po mojem mnenju je treba uvesti več zbirališč in s tem preprečiti, da se OEEO ne bi neustrezno zbirala.
In my view, action is needed on a number of fronts to prevent WEEE being disposed of improperly.
Nezakonite pošiljke
Illegal shipment
Trenutno se odpadki iz EU v veliki meri pošiljajo nezakonito.
Large quantities of waste equipment are still being shipped illegally to countries outside the EU.
Odpadna oprema se pogosto zavajajoče označi za delujoče rabljene izdelke in se kot taka izvozi iz EU.
In too many cases, such equipment is being declared as used but functional and, on that basis, is being exported beyond the Union.
Zaradi tega je treba s pomočjo te direktive poskrbeti za preprosto ločevanje med odpadno in rabljeno opremo.
A simpler distinction between waste and used equipment therefore needs to be introduced with the help of the directive.
Tako bodo dobili carinski organi praktično orodje za učinkovit nadzor.
This will give customs authorities a practical tool enabling them to carry out effective checks.
Glede na sedanje količine nezakonito izvoženih odpadkov morajo države članice uresničiti svojo odgovornost za izvajanje direktive.
Given the large volume of waste currently being shipped illegally, the Member States also need to exercise the responsibility that is clearly theirs for enforcement of the directive.
Stopnja zbiranja
Collection rate
Nadaljnji vzvod za ustrezno obdelavo v skladu z direktivo in za zmanjšanje nezakonitega izvoza je stopnja zbiranja.
The collection rate is another important lever available for promoting proper treatment of WEEE, in line with the directive, and curbing its illegal export.
Velik delež ločeno zbranih odpadkov bo omogočil, da se bo tok odpadkov znotraj EU ohranil, in pripomogel k obdelavi ali pripravi za ponovno uporabo.
Increasing the rate of separated collection is a means of keeping waste streams within the EU and directing waste equipment to treatment or preparation for re-use.
Zato je pomembno določiti ambiciozen cilj glede zbiranja.
It is therefore very important to set an ambitious collection target.
Sedanji cilj 4 kg na prebivalca na leto so nekatere države članice izpolnile, druge pa so dosegle celo precej večjo stopnjo.
Some Member States have met the current collection target of 4kg per inhabitant per year and, indeed, some have achieved considerably higher rates.
Nekatere države tega cilja v letih 2005 in 2006 niso dosegle.
Other countries, however, fell far short of the target in 2005 and 2006.
Dosedanji cilj 4 kg na prebivalca na leto ne ustreza različnim razmeram v državah članicah – ena je na primer leta 2006 zastavljeni cilj za več kot trikrat presegla.
The collection target of 4kg per inhabitant per year, applicable thus far, fails to reflect the different circumstances in individual Member States – for example, one Member State had already achieved a rate more than triple the target by 2006.
Za druge države članice, ki dajo na trg le omejene količine EEO in katerih trgi niso zasičeni, pa ni mogoče doseči niti starega cilja.
By contrast, other Member States, in which only very limited quantities of EEE are placed on the market and whose markets are not saturated, are unable to achieve the old collection target.
Zaradi tega je ustreznejša stopnja zbiranja, izražena v odstotkih in določena glede na količino EEO, ki se v posameznem obdobju da na trg, saj bo odražala posebne nacionalne razmere.
For that reason, a percentage collection rate, set in function of the amount of EEE placed on the market over a given period, is more appropriate as it will reflect specific national circumstances.
Potreben bo tudi vmesni cilj, če bo cilj, izražen v odstotkih, začel veljati šele po letu 2016.
An interim target will also be necessary if a percentage target is to take effect only from 2016.
Določitev vmesnega cilja bo omogočila tudi postopno napredovanje proti ambiciozno zastavljenemu cilju, ki bo začel veljati po letu 2016.
Setting an interim target will have the further effect of facilitating gradual improvement towards the ambitious target that will apply from 2016.
Po mojem mnenju je zelo pomembno, da si zastavimo ambiciozen cilj, saj bo to spodbudilo države članice k zmanjšanju velikih količin odpadkov, ki zdaj uhajajo skozi „sistem“ OEEO.
In my view it is very important to have an ambitious collection target as it will help encourage the Member States to reduce the large volumes of waste currently escaping the 'WEEE system'.
Državam članicam so na voljo različne rešitve: od omejitve števila izvajalcev z dovoljenjem za zbiranje odpadne opreme in povečanja števila zbirališč pa do tega, da se proizvajalcem naloži obveznost, naj uvedejo sistem spodbud za to, da bi potrošniki odpadno opremo vračali.
The Member States can address this problem in various ways: from restricting the number of operators permitted to collect waste appliances, to increasing the number of collection points, to requiring producers to introduce systems of incentives for consumers to return waste appliances.
Nacionalni trgi odpadkov so izredno različni, ta direktiva pa ne sme posegati v nacionalne tržne strukture.
There is considerable diversity in the way that national markets for waste have developed, so this directive does not include stipulations about national market structures.
Podaljšanje obdobja za poročanje na tri leta naj bi pomagalo izravnati vplive tržnih nihanj in bolje upoštevati nezasičene trge.
The extension of the reporting interval to three years is intended to help even out the impact of market fluctuations and to take better account of unsaturated markets.
Iz okoljskih razlogov je treba doseči visoko stopnjo ločenega zbiranja za zamrzovalnike, hladilnike in svetila, ki vsebujejo živo srebro, Komisija pa mora po potrebi predlagati posebne stopnje za tovrstne naprave.
For environmental reasons, high rates of separated collection need to be achieved for freezers, fridges and lamps containing mercury and, if necessary the Commission should propose specific rates for such appliances.
Namen te zahteve je, da bi namenili posebno pozornost napravam, ki najbolj škodujejo okolju, na primer plinskim sijalkam in napravam, ki vsebujejo klorofluoroogljikovodike, pa doslej niso bile prikazane v ločeni kategoriji.
The intention here is that products such as gas discharge lamps and appliances containing CFCs, which have the greatest environmental impact but which have not previously appeared as a separate category, can be the subject of specific attention.
Pomembno je, da tudi proizvajalci ravnajo odgovorno, pa ne zgolj zaradi okolja: odgovoren pristop je tudi v njihovem interesu.
It is important, however, that producers too should behave responsibly, and not only in the interests of the environment: a responsible approach should also be in their own interests.
S predelavo OEEO namreč spet pridobijo dragocene sekundarne surovine.
The recovery of WEEE offers them a source of valuable secondary raw materials.
Zaenkrat veliko dragocene opreme ne pride nazaj do proizvajalcev, kar bi jih moralo spodbuditi k razvijanju spodbud za to, da bi jim potrošniki odpadno opremo vračali.
Currently, a great deal of equipment of value is not making its way back to the producers and that should stimulate them to devise incentives for consumers to return their waste equipment.
Odgovoren pristop proizvajalcev bi spodbujal inovacije, s tem pa bi jim zagotovil tudi dolgoročno konkurenčnost.
A responsible approach on the part of producers requires them to innovate and thus helps to ensure their long-term competitiveness.
Odgovornost za cilj glede zbiranja
Responsibility for collection targets
To, da so za uresničevanje cilja glede zbiranja odgovorne države članice, ne zmanjša odgovornosti proizvajalcev – ravno narobe.
The fact that responsibility for the achievement of the collection target rests with the Member States, rather than the producers, does not lessen the producers’ responsibility – quite the contrary.
Če pravno odgovornost za uresničevanje cilja glede zbiranja naložimo samo na ramena proizvajalcev, ne bomo dosegli višje stopnje zbiranja.
Placing legal responsibility for achievement of the collection target solely on the producers’ shoulders cannot be seen as a means of achieving significantly higher collection rates.
Čeprav imajo proizvajalci zaradi svoje odgovornosti gotovo velike obveznosti glede zbiranja odpadne opreme, te naloge sami ne bodo zmogli.
While producers – on the basis of producer responsibility – certainly have substantial duties in relation to the collection of waste appliances, they cannot manage the task alone.
Seveda vsa odpadna oprema ne bo prišla v sistem zbiranja, ki ga financirajo proizvajalci.
It is evident that not all waste equipment makes its way into the collection systems financed by producers.
Ko oprema postane odpadek, namreč ni več v njihovih rokah.
At the point when appliances become waste, they no longer belong to their producers.
Zato razen sistemov spodbud za vračanje nimajo drugih možnosti, kot da zahtevajo od drugih (trgovcev z odpadnim materialom), naj njihove proizvode vračajo.
Apart from incentive systems, the latter have no means of requiring other parties (scrap merchants, for example) to return their products to them.
Če bi proizvajalcem naložili pravno odgovornost za cilj glede zbiranja, bi nanje morali prenesti tudi odgovornost za proces zbiranja.
If producers were to be given legal responsibility for the collection target, responsibility for the collection process would also have to be transferred to them.
Vendar se EU na nobenem področju svojih pristojnosti ne sme vmešavati v posamezne nacionalne sisteme za odlaganje odpadkov.
However, the EU has no area of competence under which it can interfere in individual national systems for waste disposal.
Zbiranje bi lahko prevzele obstoječe uspešne infrastrukture.
The intention is to allow collection to remain the task of existing successful infrastructure.
Da naloga ni nemogoča, so dokazale že dosežene stopnje v nekaterih državah.
That the task is possible is clear from the rates already achieved in some countries.
Odgovornost potrošnikov
Consumer responsibility
Tudi potrošniki so deloma odgovorni za ustrezno odlaganje odpadne opreme.
Consumers too bear a significant share of responsibility for ensuring that waste equipment is disposed of properly.
Vse preveč naprav namreč neuporabljenih leži v predalih ali pa jih nezakonito odložijo v gospodinjski zabojnik za odpadke.
Too many appliances either lie forgotten and unused in drawers or cupboards or end up, illegally, in the domestic waste bin.
Sistemi spodbud proizvajalcev bi lahko gotovo prispevali k temu, da bi potrošniki svojo zastarelo opremo prinesli v ustrezno obdelavo, proizvajalci pa so odgovorni tudi za to, da na zbirališča odpeljejo lastno opremo ali jo vrnejo distributerjem.
Producers’ incentive systems can certainly play a part here in getting consumers to put their appliances in the proper channels for treatment, but they also have a responsibility of their own for taking equipment to recovery points or back to sales outlets.
Od te odgovornosti proizvajalcev ne moremo niti ne smemo odvezati.
They cannot be absolved of that responsibility, nor should they be.
Ob tem moramo zavrniti tudi financiranje odvoza OEEO iz gospodinjstev.
Another option that must be rejected here is funding the collection of WEEE from the consumer's door.
Eden od učinkov bi bilo prekrivanje s preskušenimi (na primer občinskimi) ureditvami zbiranja odpadkov, pri čemer ne bi bilo večje okoljske korist, na primer zmanjšano količino odpadkov, ki niso zajeti v uradnem zbiranju.
One of the effects of that would be to interfere with tried and tested (e.g. municipal) collection arrangements without any prospect of increased environmental benefit – i.e. of reducing the volume of waste equipment escaping official collection.
V prvih letih veljave direktive je postalo jasno, da so razlike pri njenem izvajanju v različnih državah članicah v nekaterih primerih povzročile precejšnjo birokracijo in s tem povezane stroške.
In the first years that the directive was in force, it became clear that differences in its implementation in the different Member States had resulted in some cases in a proliferation of red tape, with associated costs.
To je občutno zavrlo prosto delovanje notranjega trga.
This has considerably impeded the free functioning of the internal market.
Ocena učinka, KOM (2008)810. , so možnosti za letni prihranek v vrednosti 66 milijonov EUR.
Impact Assessment, COM (2008)810. , there is scope here for annual cost savings of EUR 66 million.
Tako je predvsem zaradi različnih pogojev za registracijo v različnih državah članicah.
Differing conditions of registration in the Member States warrant particular attention in this regard.
To bi bilo treba še nadalje razviti, da bi omogočili spletno registracijo.
The intention is to take this a step further, through the proposal to enable online registration.
Medobratovalnost nacionalnih registrov bo tudi preprečila, da bi se pristojbine zaračunale večkrat in bi bili s tem proizvajalci večkratno obremenjeni.
Making national registers interoperable will also prevent the situation whereby fees are levied more than once, placing a recurring burden on producers.
Uskladitev formata za registracijo in poročanje bi znatno pripomogla k zmanjšanju upravnih stroškov in poenostavila uporabo direktive.
Harmonisation of the format for registration and reporting will help significantly to reduce administrative costs and simplify the directive's application.
Pomembno je, da je podlaga za podatke, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, usklajena, saj v tem trenutku nacionalni podatki niso dovolj primerljivi.
It is important here that the nature of the figures used by the Member States should be harmonised because currently national data are not sufficiently comparable.
Teža odpadkov se na primer v različnih državah članicah različno izračunava.
The weight of waste, for example, is calculated differently in different Member States.
Oviro za notranji trg zaradi zahteve številnih držav članic, da morajo imeti proizvajalci v državi podružnico, da lahko dajejo opremo na njen trg, je treba odpraviti.
The impediment to the internal market created by the insistence of many Member States that producers must have a branch in a given country in order to place equipment on the market there needs to be removed.
Kategorije opreme
Categories of equipment
Kategorije so urejene po okoljskih vidikih, saj imajo naprave v posameznih skupinah podobno sestavo, upoštevan pa je tudi njihov okoljski vpliv.
The categorisation reflects an environmental approach as the grouped appliances have similarities in terms of composition and their environmental impact is taken into account.
Za področje uporabe direktive kategorije niso več pomembne; ostajajo zgolj za namene stopnje predelave, recikliranja in priprave za ponovno uporabo.
The categories are no longer relevant with regard to the directive’s scope of application: they remain relevant only in relation to the recovery, recycling and preparation-for-re-use rates.
Izkušnje so razkrile ogromne razlike pri tem, kako države članice direktivo tolmačijo in uporabljajo.
Experience with the directive has revealed a huge diversity in Member States’ interpretation and application of it.
Zato se načrtuje, da uvrstitev naprave v kategorijo ne bi bila več potrebna za določanje, ali zanjo zahteve direktive veljajo ali ne: namesto tega v področje uporabe načeloma spada vsa OEEO.
For that reason, the intention is that inclusion of an appliance in a specific category should no longer be crucial to determining whether it is subject to the directive’s requirements: instead, all EEE are, in principle, to fall within the directive’s scope of application.
To odslikava pomemben pomislek pri reviziji direktive: kako zagotoviti pravno varnost.
This reflects one of the major concerns in the review of the directive: the need to create legal certainty.
Odstopanja od področja uporabe morajo snovalci zakonodaje določiti že v direktivi.
Exceptions to the scope of application must be stipulated by the legislators themselves within the directive.
Ni dovolj samo sestaviti izčrpen seznam izdelkov, saj se trg z električno in elektronsko opremo hitro spreminja, tako da bi bilo treba direktivo nenehno revidirati, pa nikdar ne bi bila ustrezno posodobljena.
On the other hand, it is not sufficient to include a list of products at the end because the electrical and electronics market is a rapidly changing one, so the directive would have to be revised continually and would never be up to date.
Naprave za dvojno uporabo
Dual-use appliances
Tudi glede tovrstnih naprav je potrebna pojasnitev.
Clarification is also required in relation to appliances intended for dual use.
V tem trenutku nastajajo težave pri razvrščanju opreme, namenjene tako za zasebno kot poslovno rabo, bodisi za poslovanje med podjetjem in potrošnikom ali med podjetji.
Difficulties currently arise with the classification of equipment suitable for both domestic and business use as either ‘business-to-business’ or ‘business-to-consumer’.
Pri številnih vrstah naprav ni mogoče predvideti, ali bo končni uporabnik potrošnik ali podjetnik.
In the case of many types of appliance, it cannot be foreseen whether the end user will be a consumer or someone running a business.
Zbiranje odpadne opreme iz gospodinjstev je navadno dražje.
However, collecting waste equipment from private households is usually more costly.
Obstaja nevarnost, da bi tovrstno opremo označili za negospodinjsko, s tem pa ogrozili financiranje za opremo iz gospodinjstev.
There is a risk here that such equipment will be designated as non-household, thus jeopardising the financing for household waste equipment.
Zato mora zakonodajalec določiti jasna in nedvoumna pravila.
The directive must, therefore, lay down clear and straightforward rules.
Standardi za zbiranje, obdelavo in recikliranje
Standards for collection, treatment and recycling
Raven kakovosti pri zbiranju, obdelavi in recikliranju odpadne opreme se močno razlikuje, zato je zaradi okolja potrebno nujno ukrepanje.
Quality levels in the collection, treatment and recycling of waste equipment currently differ widely and urgent action is needed to remedy that, for the sake of the environment.
Neustrezne metode zbiranja, obdelave in recikliranja imajo hude posledice za okolje, otežujejo pa tudi konkurenco.
Inappropriate collection, treatment and recycling methods have serious effects on the environment, and quality differences are also bad for competition.
Te težave lahko obvladamo z oblikovanem standardov zbiranja, obdelave in recikliranja.
These problems can be countered by the establishment of collection, treatment and recycling standards.