natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
27 a. poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, kako namerava spodbujati kupovanje lokalnih ekološko pridelanih kmetijskih proizvodov;
Calls on the Commission to outline how it proposes to promote the local trading of environmentally friendly agricultural products;
Zasebni sistemi certificiranja
Private certification systems
65. obžaluje, da v sporočilu Komisije ni navedena potreba po podpiranju promocijskih ukrepov, ki so še kako pomembni za zagotavljanje donosnosti ukrepov kmetov v zvezi s kakovostjo, varnostjo hrane in okoljem; meni, da je treba pregledati instrumente promocije, ki jih ima Evropska unija na voljo, in izboljšati njihovo učinkovitost; v zvezi s tem predlaga razširitev pomoči za promocijo, ki je bila pred kratkim uvedena v vinskem sektorju, na trg EU;
Deplores the failure of the Commission’s communication to mention the need to encourage promotion measures, given their importance for ensuring the profitability of European farmers’ efforts in terms of quality, food safety and the environment; believes that the promotion instruments currently available to the EU need to be revised so as to improve their efficiency; proposes, in this connection, extending to the EU market the promotion aids recently introduced in the wine sector;
68. meni, da morajo glede na to, kako pomemben je evropski trg za proizvajalce izdelkov z geografsko označbo, Komisija in države članice omogočiti dodatna finančna sredstva za promocijske programe v notranjem trgu in hkrati nadaljevati z višanjem proračuna za promocijske kampanje v tretjih državah;
Considers that, in view of the importance of the European market to GI producers, the Commission and the Member States should provide additional financial resources for promotion programmes within the internal market, while continuing to increase the budget for promotion campaigns in third countries;
72. poziva k vzpostavitvi programov za spodbujanje prodaje na lokalnih trgih z namenom podpreti lokalne in regionalne pobude za predelavo in trženje; meni, da bi to lahko dosegle zadruge proizvajalcev glede na njihov prispevek k povečanju dodane vrednosti na podeželju;
Calls for the establishment of programmes to promote sales on the local market, with a view to supporting local and regional processing and marketing initiatives; believes this could be achieved, for instance, by producers’ cooperatives, in view of their contribution to enhancing added value in the countryside;
Eden od možnih odzivov na globalizacijo trgov in hudo krizo, ki jo Evropa čuti tudi v kmetijskem sektorju, je osredotočanje na kakovost proizvodov.
With market globalisation and the severe crisis now affecting Europe, its agriculture included, one possible response on the part of the agricultural market is to place the emphasis on product quality.
Politika Evropske unije o kakovosti lahko izboljša konkurenčnost in prispeva dodano vrednost gospodarstvom evropskih regij, saj je to pogosto edina možnost za razvoj podeželja na številnih območjih z omejenimi možnostmi za raznolikost proizvodnje.
EU quality policy can enhance competitiveness and create value added for Europe's regional economies: indeed, for many rural areas where production alternatives are few, it offers the one and only opportunity for development.
Politika kakovosti se ne more ločevati od kmetijske politike Skupnosti, prav tako ne sme zanemarjati novih izzivov, kot so boj proti podnebnim spremembam, ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, oskrba z energijo in razvoj bioenergije, dobro počutje živali ter gospodarjenje z vodnimi viri v kmetijstvu, saj na teh področjih danes družba pričakuje izboljšave.
Quality policy cannot be dissociated from the CAP as a whole, nor can it stand aside from such new challenges as the fight against climate change, the need to preserve biodiversity, energy supply issues, the development of bioenergies and animal welfare, not to mention water management in agriculture, an area where society now requires improvements.
Politika kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov mora v prihodnje ustrezno obravnavati to zapleteno problematiko in naraščajoče potrebe potrošnikov tako, da opredeli načelo kakovosti, ki ne bi bilo omejeno in statično, ampak povezano s številnimi zmogljivostmi sodobnega kmetijstva, zlasti če je dinamično, bogato in raznoliko kakor je evropsko, ki lahko nudi visokokakovostne proizvode in storitve, ki so bistvenega pomena za družbo v nenehnem razvoju.
These complex issues, as well as consumers' growing expectations, need to be suitably incorporated in the future quality policy for agricultural products, on the basis of a concept of quality that is not limited or static but is linked to the major potentialities of a modern agriculture that is, in the European case, dynamic, rich and diversified and can offer not only high-quality food products but also services of great value to a constantly evolving society.
Poročevalec se strinja s sporočilom Komisije in vključitvijo priporočil poslancev, ki so bila dana po razpravi ob predstavitvi zelene knjige o kakovostnih kmetijskih proizvodih, in pričakuje, da se čim prej uresničijo ukrepi, ki jih je Parlament predlagal v tem poročilu in ki so nastali ob razpravah in ocenah predstavnikov različnih gospodarskih združenj.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission communication and the incorporation of Parliament's recommendations following the debate on the Green Paper on agricultural product quality.
Poročevalec je najprej preučil potrebe kmetov in tržne standarde.
He also hopes that the measures proposed by Parliament in the present report, which is the fruit of discussions and evaluations received by the representatives of the various associations in the sector, will be implemented as soon as possible.
Upošteva se predlog Komisije za uvedbo evropske oznake kakovosti pri proizvodih, ki izvirajo iz Evrope in so bili tu v celoti predelani.
In the first place, your rapporteur examines farming requirements and marketing standards.
Te oznake bi bili deležni evropski proizvodi, ki ustrezajo merilom evropske proizvodnje.
Consideration is given to the Commission's proposal for an EU quality logo, for products originating and processed solely in Europe.
Oznaka bi tako lahko bila uradno priznanje za prizadevanja evropskih kmetov pri ohranjanju visokih standardov proizvodnje.
This logo would provide an umbrella for European products that meet European production standards, and could mark the formal recognition of the efforts of Europe's farmers to maintain high standards of production.
Poročevalec predlaga, naj Evropska komisija opravi študijo o možnostih uvedbe evropske oznake, ki bi temeljila na spoštovanju meril kakovosti, ki so potrebna za ohranjanje visokih standardov.
It is suggested, therefore, that the Commission should undertake a study of the possibility of introducing such a logo, on a basis of respect for the quality criteria which are needed to ensure continued high standards.
Poročevalec tudi meni, da je pri tržnih standardih za kmetijske proizvode zelo pomembno, da je izmenjava na trgu pregledna in da kupcem, od trgovca na debelo do potrošnika, omogoči primerjavo cen, mer in kakovosti proizvodov ter zagotovi enake konkurenčne pogoje znotraj Evropske unije.
With regard to the rules for marketing agricultural products, your rapporteur believes that they remain of major importance as a means of ensuring the transparency of market transactions and enabling purchasers, from wholesalers to consumers, to compare the price, measurements and quality of products and guarantee a level playing field in the Union.
Potrošniki pogosto zamenjujejo navedbo kraja predelave hrane s krajem izvora kmetijskega proizvoda in pogosto ne poznajo delovanja prehrambene verige.
Consumers often confuse the geographical indication of where a food product was processed with the place of origin of the agricultural product as such, and are often not aware of how the food chain operates.
Zato poročevalec meni, da samo obvezna oznaka kraja proizvodnje primarnih proizvodov lahko potrošniku ponudi pravo informacijo o kakovosti kupljenega proizvoda, saj gre proizvod skozi proizvodne postopke, ki lahko močno vplivajo na njegove lastnosti glede kakovosti in varnosti hrane.
Your rapporteur considers that only the compulsory indication of the place of production of the primary products can provide consumers with full information on the quality of the products they are buying, since products are subject to a production cycle which exerts considerable influence on their characteristics in terms of quality and food safety.
Priporočljivo je tudi, da se uvede zakonodaja, ki bi predpisala označevanje kraja izvora predelanih živil.
He also hopes legislation will be introduced covering the indication of place of origin for processed food products.
Poročevalec je preučil geografske oznake in tradicionalne specialitete.
In the second place, your rapporteur has examined the aspect of geographical indications and traditional specialities.
Geografske označbe so zelo pomembne za evropsko kmetijstvo, tako z gospodarskega kot tudi z etičnega, okoljskega in socialnega vidika, zaradi neločljive povezanosti proizvodov z ozemljem ter za ohranjanje in razvoj podeželja, saj so vezane na tradicijo, zgodovino, okus in posebna znanja, ki se prenašajo skozi čas.
Geographical indications are of major importance for European agriculture, not only economically but also in ethical, environmental and social terms, in relation to the intimate links of the products with their locality and the conservation and development of the countryside in the context of tradition, history, taste and unique knowledge handed down over time.
Zato poročevalec meni, da je treba tri sisteme geografskega označevanja ohraniti takšne, kot so.
Your rapporteur therefore considers that the three existing systems for registration of geographical indications should continue in their present form.
Pri sistemih zaščitene označbe porekla (ZOP) in zaščitene geografske označbe (ZGO) predlaga, naj se sistema geografskega označevanja ohranita ločeno, saj vzpostavitev enotnega sistema zaščite ne bi upoštevala posebnih razlik pri obliki in močni povezavi med proizvodom in geografskim območjem proizvodnje, pravil proizvodnje, predelave in izdelave kmetijskih proizvodov.
With respect to the two instruments, PDO and PGI, your rapporteur proposes that these two systems for geographical indication continue to be kept separate, since to create a single protection system would be to fail to take account of the specific differences in the nature and closeness of the links between the products and their geographical area of production, as well as the different rules governing the production, processing and manufacture of agricultural products.
Poročevalec meni, da je poenostavljanje pravil zaželeno, ko se s tem olajša birokratsko breme podjetij, to pa se ne sme spremeniti v nižanje standardov, ki so jih evropski proizvajalci dosegli z velikimi napori in visokimi stroški.
Your rapporteur believes that simplification of the rules is desirable where the aim is to cut red tape for enterprises, but that this should not bring about any reduction in the standards that have been achieved by European products thanks to considerable effort and investment.
V zvezi z geografskimi označbami po uradni dolžnosti kot dolžnosti organov v vseh državah članicah poročevalec predlaga revizijo Uredbe 510/2006 in opredelitev posebnih evropskih postopkov.
On the subject of ex officio protection of geographical indications, as an obligation incumbent on the authorities of all Member States, your rapporteur favours the revision of Regulation 510/2006 and a definition of specific European procedures.
Zahteva, naj se za geografske oznake tretjih držav vzpostavi boljša zaščita z vključitvijo mednarodnih registrov in mednarodnim priznanjem v sistemu Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
With regard to geographical indications of third countries, your rapporteur wishes to see greater protection of such indications, by means of inclusion in international registries and international recognition through the WTO system.
Poročevalec je preučil tudi politike promocije in sporočanja.
Finally, your rapporteur has examined the aspect of promotion and communication policies.
Za spodbujanje politike o kakovosti Evropske unije meni, da je zagotavljanje uspeha politik o kakovosti bistveno intenzivno izobraževanje in informiranje potrošnikov o različnih evropskih oznakah in o jamstvu, ki jih te oznake nudijo.
He believes that in order to promote the Union's quality policy it is essential to undertake an intensive campaign of consumer education and information concerning the various European labels and the guarantees they represent, as a means of ensuring that quality policy succeeds.
o politiki kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov: katera strategija je prava
on agricultural product quality policy: what strategy to follow?
3. obžaluje, da sporočilo Komisije zaradi prizadevanj za poenostavitev, ki bi lahko delovala zaviralno, le deloma upošteva zahteve, ki so jih zadevni sektorji izrazili po objavi Zelene knjige;
Regrets the fact that the Commission communication, on the grounds of a simplification which could prove counterproductive, has only partially taken on board the requirements specified by the sectors concerned following the publication of the Green Book;
5. zavrača združitev sistemov registracije geografskih označb za vina, žgane pijače in živila, ker je treba ohraniti posebne značilnosti vsakega izmed njih;
Rejects the notion of merging the systems of registration of geographical indications for wines, spirits and foodstuffs, in view of the need to maintain the specific characteristics of each;
8. poudarja, da mora Komisija poskušati pri pogajanjih STO doseči dogovor o netrgovinskih vprašanjih, ki bi zagotavljal, da bodo uvoženi kmetijski proizvodi izpolnjevali iste zahteve EU glede varnosti hrane, dobrega počutja živali in varstva okolja, kot veljajo za kmetijske proizvode iz EU;
Emphasises that in the WTO negotiations the Commission must seek to secure an agreement on the 'non-trade concerns' which ensures that imported agricultural products meet the same EU requirements in the areas of food safety, animal welfare and environmental protection as those imposed on agricultural products produced in the EU;
10. meni, da mora biti politika v zvezi s kakovostjo kmetijskih proizvodov, na primer glede označevanja, povezana z drugimi zakonodajnimi določbami, ki veljajo v EU; meni, da bi bilo treba politiko kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov izvajati tako, da bi se upoštevali stroški nove politike ter posebnosti posameznih sektorjev, kot je sektor predelanih kmetijskih proizvodov;
Considers that policy concerning agricultural product quality, for example on labelling, should be coherent with other relevant EU legislation; considers that agricultural product quality policy should be carried out in a manner that takes into account the costs of new policy, as well as the specificities of particular sectors, such as the processed agricultural goods sector;
12. obžaluje, da je Komisija kljub nasprotovanju večine držav članic že začela v praksi ukinjati tržne standarde Skupnosti v sektorju sadja in zelenjave, ne da bi počakala na končni izid razprave o prihodnosti politike kakovosti Evropske unije, in je tako prehitela odločitve, ki naj bi jih o tem sprejela Svet EU in Evropski parlament;
Regrets the fact that the Commission has already, in the face of the opposition of a majority of Member States, proceeded to the effective dismantling of the Community marketing standards in the fruit and vegetable sector, without awaiting the final outcome of the debate on the future of the EU's quality policy and thus pre-empting the decisions to be adopted by the Council and Parliament on the matter;
15. meni, da je treba spodbujati prostovoljno označevanje okolju in živalim prijaznih načinov proizvodnje, kot so "integrirana pridelava", "pašna reja" in "hribovsko kmetijstvo";
Believes it is necessary to promote the voluntary labelling of other environment- and animal-friendly production methods, such as 'integrated production', 'outdoor grazing' and 'hill farming';
o predlogu odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj vseevropskega prometnega omrežja (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (recast)
(Prenovitev – člen 87 poslovnika)
(Recast – Rule 87 of the Rules of Procedure)
PRILOGA: PISMO ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE...........................................................7
ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS.....................................8
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE DELOVNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA, SVETA IN KOMISIJE 9
ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION 10
(Redni zakonodajni postopek – prenovitev)
(Ordinary legislative procedure – recast)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0391 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0391 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 156(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7-0111/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 156(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0111/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 294(3) in 172(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 172(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 4. novembra 2009
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 4 November 2009
Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu. ;
Not yet published in the Official Journal. ,
– ob upoštevanju posvetovanja z Odborom regij,
– after consulting the Committee of the Regions,
– ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za pravne zadeve Odboru za promet in turizem z dne 11. decembra 2009 v skladu s členom 87(3) poslovnika,
– having regard to the letter of 11 December 2009 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Transport and Tourism in accordance with Rule 87(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju členov 87 in 55 poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 87 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7–0030/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7‑0030/2010 ),
1. sprejme v nadaljevanju podano mnenje, ob upoštevanju priporočil posvetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Adopts the position hereinafter set out, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
(19) Pri Komisiji naj bo ustanovljen odbor z nalogami, ki vključujejo pomoč Komisiji, kadar preverja izvajanje in razvijanje smernic predvidenih s to odločbo.
(19) A Committee should be set up at the Commission with tasks which include assisting the Commission when it examines the implementation and development of the guidelines laid down by this Decision.
(19) Določiti je treba odbor , ki bo pristojen predvsem za pomoč Komisiji, kadar preverja izvajanje in razvijanje smernic , predvidenih s to odločbo.
(19) A Committee should be empowered, in particular, to assist the Commission when it examines the implementation and development of the guidelines laid down by this Decision.
(20) Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba v Prilogo I Odločbe zemljevidom za 15 držav, ki so bile članice Evropske unije pred njeno širitvijo 1. maja 2004, dodati zemljevide za 10 držav članic, vključenih v Akt o pristopu iz leta 2003, ter rok za oblikovanje načrta za vseevropsko prometno omrežje prestaviti z leta 2010 na 2020 .
(20) In the interests of clarity , the maps relating to the 10 Member States listed in the 2003 Act of Accession in Annex I to the Decision should be added to the existing maps relating to the 15 countries that were Members of the European Union before the enlargement of 1 May 2004, and the 2010 target date for the plan should be replaced by 2020.
Ta sprememba je predvidena v členu 1(15) Odločbe št. 884/2004/ES in se mora izvesti.
This amendment was provided for in Article 1(15) of Decision No 884/2004/EC and it must be made.
(20) Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba Prilogo I Odločbe št. 1692/96/ES nadomestiti z novo prilogo, ki bo vsebovala zemljevide vseh držav članic; s tem bi zagotovili, da bodo zemljevidi, ki jih ta odločba, kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1791/2006, že vsebuje, dopolnjeni z zemljevidi iz akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.
(20) In the interests of clarity, Annex I of Decision No 1692/96/EC should be replaced with a new Annex containing the maps concerning all of the Member States; this would ensure that the maps already contained in that Decision as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 are supplemented by those contained in the 2003 Act of Accession.
Poleg tega je ciljni datum za načrt leto 2020 za vse države članice.
Moreover the target date for the plan is 2020 for all of the Member States.
Tehnično gledano gre pri predlogu za kodifikacijo zakonodajnega besedila
The proposal is technically speaking a proposal for codification of the legislative text.
Potrebna sprememba je, da se v Prilogi I k odločbi vsebovani zemljevidi 15 držav članic, ki so bile članice Evropske unije pred širitvijo 1. maja 2004, dopolnijo z zemljevidi 10 držav članic iz akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.
The necessary amendments consist of adding the maps relating to the 10 Member States listed in the 2003 Act of Accession in Annex I to the Decision to the existing maps relating to the 15 countries that were Members of the European Union before the enlargement of 1 May 2004.
Zaradi jasnosti se predlaga, da se Priloga I h kodificiranemu besedilu nadomesti z novo Prilogo I, ki bo vključevala zemljevide 27 držav članic Evropske unije.
In the interests of clarity, it is proposed to replace Annex I to the codified text with a new Annex I which would include the maps concerning the 27 Member States of the European Union.
Hkrati se za vse države članice spremeni letnica na 2020, kar je v skladu s členom 1(1) Odločbe št. 884/2004/ES.
At the same time, in line with Art 1(1) of Decision No. 884/2004/EC, the date is changed to 2020 for all Member States.
Glede na to, da je predlog tehnične narave, so se koordinatorji odločili, da bodo poročilo predložili predsedujočemu, saj je prava revizija smernic še v pripravi in bo nared šele proti koncu naslednjega leta.
Considering the technical nature of this proposal, coordinators decided to give the report to the chair as the real revision of the guidelines is in preparation and will be ready only towards the end of next year.
Svet je dosegel dogovor o besedilu in na srečanju 18. decembra sprejel splošni pristop.
The Council has agreed on a text and a general approach was taken at the Council meeting on 18 December.
Sledil je Komisiji in besedila ni bistveno spreminjal, ampak je zgolj vnesel manjše spremembe v uvodne izjave (glej predloga sprememb) in nekaj tehničnih popravkov zemljevidov
Council followed the Commission and has not introduced any substantial modification to the text, just some minor modifications in the recitals (see the 2 amendments) and some technical corrections on the maps
V Zvezku II:
In Volume II:
1) Točka 2.1 („Danska, Nemčija, Luksemburg, Nizozemska, Avstrija“ se izbrišejo zaradi uskladitve z ustreznim zemljevidom)
1) Section 2.1 ("Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Austria" deleted to align with the corresponding map);
2) Točka 6.1 („Danska, Nemčija, Luksemburg, Nizozemska, Avstrija“ se dodajo zaradi uskladitve z ustreznim zemljevidom)
2) Section 6.1 ("Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Austria" added to align with the corresponding map);
3) Zemljevid 2.27 („Londonderry“, ki se nahaja med Newcastlom in Leedsom, se izbriše).
3) Map 2.27 ("Londonderry" located between Newcastle and Leeds deleted).
V Zvezku IV:
In Volume IV:
1) Zemljevid 5.1 (Baltsko morje): „Kristianstad“ se nadomesti z „Landskrona“;
1) Map 5.1 (Baltic Sea): "Kristianstad" is replaced by "Landskrona";