natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Podatki, ki jih je treba zagotoviti, in cilji, ki jih je treba izvesti v okviru področja 3, se lahko zagotovijo tudi na manj zapleten in bolj pregleden način v okviru področij 1 in 2.
Data and goals to carry out under the scope of Domain 3 can also be obtained in a less confusing and in a more transparant way under the scope of both Domains 1 and 2.
Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pripravi in razvoju statističnih podatkov o izobraževanju in vseživljenjskem učenju
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the production and development of statistics on education and lifelong learning
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa „Preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje“ za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“
on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2007-2013 the specific programme "Drug prevention and information" as part of the General programme "Fundamental Rights and Justice"
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (08698/4/2007 – C6‑0258/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (8698/4/2007 – C6‑0258/2007 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 14.12.2006, P6_TA(2006)0579 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0230 )
Texts adopted, 14.12.2006, P6_TA(2006)0579 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0230 )
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0308/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0308/2007 ),
Parlament je 14. decembra 2006 v prvi obravnavi sprejel stališče o posebnem programu „Preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje“ v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“.
On 14 December 2006, Parliament adopted its position at first reading regarding the specific programme "Drugs prevention and information" as part of the General Programme "Fundamental Rights and Justice".
Svet je v skupnem stališču, ki ga je posredoval Parlamentu, v skladu s sporazumom iz prve obravnave predloge sprememb Parlamenta sprejel, zavrnil pa je predloge, po katerih bi Parlament lahko blokiral odločitve Komisije glede izvajanja, še posebej pri izbiri letnih prednostnih nalog.
In its common position forwarded to Parliament and in accordance with the agreement at first reading, the Council accepted Parliament's amendments, but rejected those concerning the possibility for Parliament to block Commission decisions on implementation, notably when annual priorities are chosen.
Po tem, ko je Parlament 11. julija 2007 v drugi obravnavi sprejel stališče glede skupnega stališča Sveta o sklepu Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi posebnega programa „Civilno pravosodje“ za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“ ( 2005/0040(COD) ), je Svet odločil, da bo sporazum, ki so ga dosegli Parlament, Svet in Komisija v zvezi s postopkom v odboru v primeru posebnega programa „Civilno pravosodje“, veljal tudi za posebni program „Preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje“ in skladno s tem spremenil osnutek skupnega stališča.
Following the adoption by Parliament on 11 July 2007 of its position at second reading with regard to the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2007-2013 the Specific Programme "Civil Justice" as part of the General Programme "Fundamental Rights and Justice" ( 2005/0040(COD) ) Council decided to apply the agreement reached between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission as regards the committee procedure in the case of the specific programme "Civil Justice" also to the specific programme "Drugs prevention and information" and amended its draft common position accordingly.
Skupno stališče, ki bo objavljeno na plenarnem zasedanju v ponedeljek 3. septembra 2007 zato že vsebuje predlog spremembe, podoben tistemu, ki ga je Parlament v zvezi s posebnim programom „Civilno pravosodje“ sprejel 11. julija 2007.
The common position to be announced in plenary on Monday, 3 September 2007, therefore already incorporates an amendment comparable to the one adopted by Parliament on 11 July 2007 with regard to the specific programme "Civil Justice".
Da bi čim prej zagotovili začetek izvajanja posebnega programa „Preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje“ ter financiranje za leto 2007, poročevalec predlaga, naj odbor odobri stališče Sveta.
In order to ensure the launch of the specific programme "Drugs prevention and information" and the financing for the year 2007 as soon as possible, the rapporteur proposes that the committee approves the Council common position.
Poročevalec pričakuje, da bo Komisija na plenarnem zasedanju potrdila svojo zavezo (izraženo v uvodni izjavi 13 skupnega stališča), da Parlamentu posreduje potrebne informacije v zvezi osnutki letnih delovnih programov.
The rapporteur expects the Commission to confirm in plenary its commitment (expressed in recital 13 of the common position) to transmit the necessary information relating to the draft annual work programmes to Parliament.
V zakonodajni resoluciji bo navedeno sklicevanje na izjavo Komisije, kot je bila navedeno sklicevanje na izjavo Komisije v zakonodajni resoluciji o posebnem programu „Civilno pravosodje“, ki jo je Parlament sprejel 11. julija 2007.
There will be a reference to the statement of the Commission in the legislative resolution as there has been a reference to the Commission's statement in the legislative resolution concerning the specific programme "Civil Justice" adopted by Parliament on 11 July 2007.
Preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje (2007–2013)
Drugs prevention and information (2007-2013)
Datum razglasitve sprejetja skupnega stališča na zasedanju
Date receipt of common position announced in plenary
o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006 o ustanovitvi začasne sheme za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja v Skupnosti
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................22
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0227 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0227 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe o ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0176/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0176/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0309/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0309/2007 ),
2. meni, da mora biti okvirna referenčna vsota iz zakonodajnega predloga združljiva z zgornjo mejo iz naslova 2 novega večletnega finančnega okvira, in poudarja, da se bo letna vsota določila znotraj letnega proračunskega postopka v skladu z določbami točke 38 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006;
Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
(9a) Če tovarna za proizvodnjo sladkorja namesto pridelovalcev vloži prošnjo za pomoč za prestrukturiranje, bi morala biti odločitev, kateri pridelovalci bodo morali opustiti proizvodnjo sladkorne pese, sprejeta v skupnem dogovoru med pridelovalci in omenjeno tovarno.
(9a) Where a sugar undertaking submits an application for restructuring aid in lieu of an application from growers, decisions as to which growers are to cease sugar beet production should be taken by mutual agreement between the growers and the sugar undertaking concerned.
Tak dogovor bi moral biti naveden v medpanožnem sporazumu.
Agreements within the trade should contain an appropriate reference to such agreements.
Ko tovarna za proizvodnjo sladkorja vloži prošnjo namesto pridelovalcev, mora biti odločitev o tem, kateri pridelovalci bodo morali zapustiti sektor, sprejeta na podlagi dogovarjanj in sporazuma med zainteresiranimi stranmi.
Where a sugar undertaking takes up an application from growers, the decision as to which growers are to leave the sector must be made on the basis of consultations and agreements between both parties.
"Vsa finančna nadomestila za opustitev kvot so zračunana tako, da se do konca porabijo sredstva sklada.
"All compensation payments for quota renunciations must be so calculated that the resources in the fund are fully exhausted.
Če po financiranju odhodkov v skladu z odstavkom 2 v skladu za prestrukturiranje ostajajo sredstva, se dodelijo regijam, v katerih so tovarne sladkorja prenehale s proizvodnjo zaradi popolne ali delne opustitve kvot.
Any amount that may be available in the restructuring fund after the financing of the expenditure referred to in paragraph 2 shall be assigned to the regions where sugar factories have been closed because of partial or total quota renunciations."
Neporabljena finančna nadomestila morajo biti dodeljena regijam, kjer so tovarne popolnoma ali delno opustile proizvodnjo.
Compensation payments which have not been exhausted should particularly benefit the regions where sugar factories have been partially or wholly closed.
-a) V odstavku 1 se točka (b) nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(-a) In paragraph 1, point (b) is replaced by the following:
-aa) V odstavku 3 se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(-aa) In paragraph 3, point (c) is replaced by the following:
"c) v roku, predvidenem v členu 4(2), točka (f) sanacijo okolja na kraju tovarne ter načrt za nadaljnje delovanje obrata, ki naj vključuje plan gospodarske dejavnosti in oceno posledic prestrukturiranja za okolje in zaposlovanje glede na razmere v regiji.
"(c) the restoring of the good environmental conditions of the factory site and the production of a business development plan which covers the planned economic activity and the impact of the restructuring on the environment and employment and which takes account of the situation in the region; within the period referred to in point (f) of Article 4(2).
Države članice lahko od podjetij iz odstavka 1 zahtevajo, da prevzamejo obveznosti, ki presegajo minimalne predpisane zahteve v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
Member States may require the undertakings referred to in paragraph 1 to make commitments which go beyond the statutory minimum requirements imposed by Community law.
Vendar pa te obveznosti ne smejo omejevati delovanja sklada za prestrukturiranje kot instrumenta".
However, such commitments shall not restrict the operation of the restructuring fund as an instrument."
Načrt za nadaljnji razvoj je nujno potreben zaradi obveznega izvajanja diverzifikacije na ravni prihodkov in zaposlovanja.
A business development plan is urgently needed for income and employment in the light of compulsory diversification.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 - A B) (novo) Člen 3, odstavek 4, točka c) (Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1), POINT (- A B) (new) Article 3, paragraph 4, point (c) (Regulation (EC) No 320/2006)
Države članice lahko od podjetij iz odstavka 1 zahtevajo, da prevzamejo obveznosti, ki presegajo minimalne predpisane zahteve v skladu s pravom Skupnosti.
Member States may require the undertakings referred to in paragraph 1 to make commitments which go beyond the statutory minimum requirements imposed by Community law.
Vendar pa te obveznosti ne smejo omejevati delovanja sklada za prestrukturiranje kot instrumenta."
However, such commitments shall not restrict the operation of the restructuring fund as an instrument.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 -A C) (novo) Člen 3, odstavek 5, točka a) (Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1), POINT (- A C) (new) Article 3, paragraph 5, point (a) (Regulation (EC) No 320/2006)
-ac) V odstavku 5 se točka (a) nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(-ac) In paragraph 5, point (a) is replaced by the following:
"a) V primeru iz odstavka 1, točki (a) in (b):
(a) In the cases referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1:
– 730 EUR za tržno leto 2006/2007,
- EUR 730 for the marketing year 2006/2007,
– 730 EUR za tržno leto 2007/2008,
- EUR 730 for the marketing year 2007/2008,
– 625 EUR za tržno leto 2008/2009,
- EUR 625 for the marketing year 2008/2009,
– 520 EUR za tržno leto 2009/2010."
- EUR 520 for the marketing year 2009/2010;
Če bi prišlo do delne odstranitve proizvodnih obratov, ali če bi se industrija preusmerila v proizvodnjo bioetanola, bi morala biti višina nadomestila enaka, kot če bi prišlo do popolne odstranitve obratov.
In the event of facilities being partially dismantled and the industry shifting to the production of bioethanol, the compensation should be equivalent to that applying to full dismantling of facilities.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 -A D) (novo) Člen 3, odstavek 5, točka c) (Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1), POINT (- A D) (new) Article 3, paragraph 5, point (c) (Regulation (EC) No 320/2006)
-ad) V odstavku 5 se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
(ad) In paragraph 5, point (c) is replaced by the following:
"c) v primeru iz odstavka 1, točka (c):
(c) in the case referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1:
- 255,50 EUR za tržno leto 2006/2007,
- EUR 255.50 for the marketing year 2006/2007,
- 255,50 EUR za tržno leto 2007/2008,
- EUR 255.50 for the marketing year 2007/2008,
- 625,00 EUR za tržno leto 2008/2009,
- EUR 625.00 for the marketing year 2008/2009,
- 182,00 EUR za tržno leto 2009/2010."
- EUR 182.00 for the marketing year 2009/2010.
Da bi bila v letu 2008/2009 prostovoljna vrnitev kvot čim večja, je predvideno celotno izplačilo nadomestila v višini 625 evrov za tono vrnjene kvote, tudi če proizvodni obrat ne bo popolnoma ali delno odstranjen.
With the aim of encouraging the maximum voluntary renunciation of quotas in 2008/2009, the full compensatory payment of EUR 625 per tonne of quota renounced should even be granted if production facilities are not wholly or partially dismantled.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 A) Člen 3, odstavek 6, pododstavek 1, uvodni del (Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1), POINT (A) Article 3, paragraph 6, subparagraph 1, introductory sentence (Regulation (EC) No 320/2006)
"Znesek 10 % ustrezne pomoči za prestrukturiranje, določene v odstavku 5, je prihranjen za:
"An amount of 10% of the relevant restructuring aid fixed in paragraph 5 shall be reserved for:
"Znesek 50 % ustrezne pomoči za prestrukturiranje, določene v odstavku 5, je prihranjen za:
"An amount of 50% of the relevant restructuring aid fixed in paragraph 5 shall be reserved for:
Režim kvot za sladkor je bil uveden zaradi zagotavljanja prihodkov in zaposlovanja pridelovalcev sladkorne pese.
The sugar quota scheme was introduced in order to guarantee the incomes and employment of beet growers.
Opustitev kvot mora zato temeljiti na skupni odločitvi pridelovalcev in proizvajalcev.
Renunciation of quotas must therefore be the result of a joint decision by growers and the sugar producer.
Pridelovalcem je treba plačati odškodnino za izgubo kapitala zaradi izgube pravic dostave in obvezne opustitve pridelovanja sladkorne pese ter posledičnega neizkoriščanja posebne kmetijske mehanizacije in prisilne preusmeritve namembnosti obratov za predelavo sladkorne pese.
Moreover, the compensation to the grower is justified by the loss of capital arising from the loss of rights to supply beet and the enforced abandonment of beet growing, which results in the abandonment of the relevant special agricultural equipment and in the necessity to convert beet growing businesses.
Nenazadnje mora medpanožni sporazum določiti način sprejemanja odločitev o prestrukturiranju in o delitvi pomoči.
In addition, the procedures for making decisions on restructuring and the allocation of aids must be laid down in an agreement within the trade.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 A) Člen 3, odstavek 6, točka a) (Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1), POINT (A) Article 3, paragraph 6, point (a) (Regulation (EC) No 320/2006)
a) pridelovalce sladkorne pese in sladkornega trsa , ki so te proizvode dobavili v obdobju neposredno pred tržnim letom iz odstavka 2 za proizvodnjo sladkorja v okviru ustrezne opuščene kvote;
(a) growers of sugar beet and cane having delivered these products during a period preceding the marketing year referred to in paragraph 2 for the production of sugar under the relevant quota renounced;
Načelo retroaktivnosti iz uvodne izjave 4 je treba vključiti v uredbo s pomočjo odstavka 8, ki naj se ga na predlog Komisije doda členu 3.
The principle of retroactivity established by Recital 4 should be implemented in the Regulation by means of a paragraph 8 which the Commission proposes to insert in Article 3.
Vendar se odstavek 8 nanaša na prejšnje odstavke (od 1 do 6).
But this paragraph 8 itself refers to the preceding paragraphs 1 to 6.
Da bi tudi pridelovalci cikorije lahko koristili retroaktivno pomoč, jih je treba omeniti v členu 3, točka (a).
In order for chicory producers likewise to have the benefit of retroactivity, they must be mentioned in Article 3, point (a).
Predlog spremembe ohranja v točki (a) besedilo sedanje uredbe.
The amendment tabled retains in point (a) the existing text of the Regulation.
Treba je pojasniti, da lahko obdobje, v katerem pridelovalci lahko prejmejo pomoč iz sheme za prestrukturiranje, zajema več tržnih let, in da se bo pri pogajanjih o dodelitvi pomoči upoštevalo objektivna merila, na podlagi katerih ne bo diskriminiran noben pridelovalec.
It should be made clear that the reference period determining the access of growers to restructuring regime aid may make up more than a single marketing period and also that during consultations on the allocation of aid account shall be taken of objective criteria which do not lead to discrimination between producers.
Do sodelovanja kmetijstva v shemi pomoči za prestrukturiranje mora priti postopoma, da se doseže strukturna optimalnost.
It should be possible for the share of the restructuring premium which accrues to farmers to be used flexibly and to optimise structures.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 A) Člen 3, odstavek 6, pododstavek 1 a (Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1), POINT (a) Article 3, paragraph 6, subparagraph 1 a (Regulation (EC) No 320/2006)
Komisija na podlagi postopka iz člena 12 sprejme izvedbene določbe, ki naj zagotovijo, da se del sredstev, dodeljenih pridelovalcem, ki so opustili pridelavo, nameni za vzpostavitev gospodarsko koristne nadomestne proizvodnje.
The Commission shall issue implementing provisions in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12 which ensure that the share of the restructuring fund received by producers leaving the sector is used for the creation of economically rational alternative forms of production.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 A A) (novo) Člen 3, odstavek 6, pododstavek 5 a (novo) (Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1), POINT (A A) (new) Article 3, paragraph 6, subparagraph 5 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 320/2006)
(aa) odstavku 6 se doda naslednji pododstavek 5a:
(aa) In paragraph 6, the following subparagraph 5a is added:
"Za popolno odstranitev se šteje preusmeritev obratov v proizvodnjo bioetanola."
"Where facilities have been converted to bioethanol production, full dismantling shall be deemed to have taken place."
Treba je ohraniti kmetijsko dejavnost z njeno preusmeritvijo v zelo obetavni sektor.
This will enable farming to continue by moving it into an emerging sector with a bright future ahead of it.
Za tržno leto 2008/2009 pridelovalci iz odstavka 6(a) prejmejo dodatno plačilo v višini 237,5 EUR na tono opuščene kvote.
For the 2008/2009 marketing year , growers referred to in paragraph 6(a) shall receive an additional payment of EUR 237.5 per tonne of quota renounced.
Pridelovalci iz odstavka 6(a) prejmejo dodatno plačilo v višini 260 EUR na tono opuščene kvote za sladkor .
Growers referred to in paragraph 6(a) shall receive an additional payment of EUR 260 per tonne of sugar quota renounced.
Poleg tega je treba pojasniti, da je dodelitev dodatne pomoči retroaktivna, kot je tudi določeno v novem odstavku 8 člena 3 predlagane uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006.
Moreover, it is essential to make clear the fact that the granting of supplementary aid is retroactive, as moreover provided for in the proposed new paragraph 8 of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 320/2006.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 B) Člen 3, odstavek 8 (Uredba (ES) št. 320/2006)
ARTICLE 1, POINT (1), POINT (B) Article 3, paragraph 8 (Regulation (EC) No 320/2006)
Ta odstavek se uporablja za:
This paragraph shall apply to
a) podjetja, ki so opustila kvoto na podlagi sheme za prestrukturiranje v tržnem letu 2006/2007 ali 2007/2008, ter
(a) undertakings having renounced quota under the restructuring scheme in the 2006/2007 or 2007/2008 marketing year, and
a) podjetja, ki so opustila delno ali popolnoma kvoto na podlagi sheme za prestrukturiranje v tržnem letu 2006/2007 ali 2007/2008, ter
(a) undertakings having renounced part or all of their quota under the restructuring scheme in the 2006/2007 or 2007/2008 marketing year, and
b) pridelovalce in upravljavce strojev, ki jih zadeva opustitev kvote iz točke (a).
(b) growers and machinery contractors concerned by the quota renunciation referred to in point (a).
Če so bili zneski, ki so se v tržnih letih 2006/2007 in 2007/2008 v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 dodelili osebam, zajetim v prejšnjem pododstavku , manjši od zneskov, ki bi jih prejeli v skladu z veljavnimi pogoji za tržno leto 2008/2009, se tem osebam razlika dodeli retroaktivno.
Where the amounts granted in the 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 marketing years under paragraphs 1 to 6 to persons covered by the previous subparagraph , were less than the amounts that they would have received under the conditions applicable in the 2008/2009 marketing year, the difference shall be granted to them retroactively.
Če so bili zneski, ki so se v tržnih letih 2006/2007 in 2007/2008 v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 dodelili osebam, zajetim v točki (a) , manjši od zneskov, ki bi jih prejeli v skladu z veljavnimi pogoji za tržno leto 2008/2009, se tem osebam razlika dodeli retroaktivno.
Where the amounts granted in the 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 marketing years under paragraphs 1 to 6 to persons covered by point (a) , were less than the amounts that they would have received under the conditions applicable in the 2008/2009 marketing year, the difference shall be granted to them retroactively.
Če so bili zneski, ki so se v tržnih letih 2006/2007 in 2007/2008 v skladu z odstavkom 7 dodelili pridelovalcem, manjši od zneskov, ki bi jih prejeli v skladu z veljavnimi pogoji za tržno leto 2008/2009, se tem osebam razlika dodeli retroaktivno."
Where the amounts granted in the 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 marketing years to growers under paragraph 7 were less than the amounts that they would have received under the conditions applicable in the 2008/2009 marketing year, the difference shall be granted to them retroactively.
Če so bili zneski, ki so se v tržnih letih 2006/2007 in 2007/2008 v skladu z odstavkom 7 dodelili pridelovalcem, zajetim v točki (b), manjši od zneskov, ki bi jih prejeli v skladu z veljavnimi pogoji za tržno leto 2008/2009, se tem osebam razlika dodeli retroaktivno."
Where the amounts granted in the 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 marketing years to growers referred to in point (b) under paragraph 7 were less than the amounts that they would have received under the conditions applicable in the 2008/2009 marketing year, the difference shall be granted to them retroactively.
Kot zadnji vir financiranja za kritje povišanega doplačila za pridelovalce v znesku 260 EUR/tono je treba predvideti možnost povišanja začasnega zneska za prestrukturiranje v skladu z odstavkom 2 člena 11 uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006.
As a last source of funding to cover increased additional aid to growers of the order of EUR 260/tonne, provision should be made for the possibility of increasing the provisional restructuring amount, as provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 320/2006.