natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V najboljšem primeru je bilo njihovo vedenje vzvišeno, kar zadeva posamezne lastninske pravice, v najslabšem primeru pa popolnoma brezbrižno.
At best, in many instances, their behaviour has been complacent with regard to individual property rights; at worst they have been downright dismissive.
Škoda okolju je bila storjena, kar potrjujejo tudi številna verodostojna poročila
The damage to the landscape has been done - as many authoritative reports attest
Greenpeace – Španija : Destrucción a Toda Costa .
Greenpeace - Spain : Destrucción a Toda Costa.
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente & Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en Espana: Cambios de ocupación del suelo en Espana; Implicaciones para la sostenibilidad .
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente & Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en Espana: Cambios de ocupación del suelo en Espana; Implicaciones para la sostenibilidad.
2006. , nedokončani urbanizacijski načrti pa kot številni betonski Damoklejevi meči visijo nad številnimi podeželskimi in obalnimi skupnostmi.
2006. - while the outstanding urbanisation plans remain like so many concrete swords of Damocles over many rural and coastal communities.
Zato resolucija poziva lokalne oblasti, naj opustijo in pregledajo vse obstoječe načrte ter z njimi nadaljujejo šele, ko bodo dokazali njihovo trajnost, v sprejemanje odločitev vključili lokalne skupnosti in zagotovili okoljske nadzorne ukrepe.
That is why the resolution calls for local authorities to suspend and review all existing plans and only to proceed when sustainability has been proven, involving the local communities in their choice, and environmental safeguards ensured.
Treba je podpreti zakonito pravico do lastnine.
Legitimate rights to property must be upheld.
Že v poročilu o prvem obisku za ugotavljanje dejstev v Španiji leta 2004 je bilo podrobno opisano dogajanje in njegove posledice.
The report of the first fact-finding visit to Spain in 2004 already described in great detail what was going on and its implications.
Med drugim obiskom so nekateri politiki in investitorji, ki so eden ob drugem sedeli v isti sejni dvorani, kot da bi želeli poudariti tesno medsebojno podporo, so šli celo tako daleč, da so krivdo za take razmere naprtili Odboru za peticije, saj naj bi bil odgovoren za izgubo naložb v pokrajini Valencia, to pa so tudi neposredno povedali članom delegacije.
During the second visit certain politicians and developers, sitting side by side in the same meeting room as if to emphasise their umbilical support, even went so far as to say that the situation was the fault of the Petitions Committee which was responsible for loss of investment in the Valencian region, and they said as much directly to the members of the Committee delegation.
Med tretjim obiskom v Valencii leta 2007 je njihova aroganca dosegla višek: članom delegacije je bilo rečeno, da so bile prejete peticije plod kolektivne domišljije odbora.
During the third visit to Valencia in 2007, arrogance was at its height, and members of the delegation were told that the petitions received were fabrications of the Committee's collective imagination.
Januarja se je poročevalka o tej zadevi odkrito pogovorila s pristojnim ministrom pokrajine Valencia, na nacionalni ravni pa to ni bilo možno.
In January I was able to discuss the issue frankly with the Valencian minister responsible though at national level this proved not to be possible.
Morda ni naključje, da so vzporedno s tekočimi preiskavami odbora svoje preiskave izvajali tudi španski pravosodni in izvršilni organi.
It is perhaps no coincidence that in parallel to the Committee's ongoing investigations the Spanish judicial and enforcement authorities have also been conducting their inquiries.
Kot vsi vemo, je bil rezultat teh raziskav skoraj neskončen seznam lokalnih politikov in uradnikov na celini in na otokih v Španiji, ki so bili aretirani zaradi obtožb o korupciji zaradi projektov masivne urbanizacije, ki so jih sklenili nedavno.
The result has been, as we all know, an almost endless list of local politicians and officials on mainland Spain and on the islands who have been arrested on corruption charges related to the massive urbanisation deals which have been concluded in the recent period.
Dobro poznano dejstvo je, da je bilo za izgradnjo domov v Španiji v zadnjih desetih letih porabljenega več cementa in betona kot v Franciji, Nemčiji in Združenem kraljestvu.
The fact that more cement and concrete have been used to build homes in Spain during the last decade than in France, Germany and the UK combined has become a well known fact.
Ta tragedija je seveda zasenčila utemeljene trditve številnih ljudi, ki so kritični glede preiskav odbora.
This tragedy has of course hidden a valid point made by many people who are critical of the Committee's investigations.
Gre seveda za to, da niso vsi lokalni organi podkupljeni in da niso vsi podlegli sladki skušnjavi lahkega zaslužka.
That is that, of course, not all local authorities are corrupt, not all have fallen into the honey-trap of easy financial gain.
Mnogi so ukrepali odgovorno, saj se večina županov zavzema le za interese svojih skupnosti, žalostno dejstvo pa je, da so vseeno postali žrtve masivne urbanizacije.
Many have acted responsibly, most local mayors only have the interests of their communities at heart; but the sad fact is that they have also become the victims of massive urbanisation.
Številni gradbeniki, s katerimi se je srečala vaša poročevalka, so tudi žrtve pehanja za bogastvom in politične moči večjih akterjev.
Many members of the building industry, with whom your Rapporteur has held meetings, are also victims of the rush to wealth and political power of the biggest players.
Nedvomno bodo nekoliko manjša gradbena podjetja, ki delujejo bolj trajnostno, v skladu z lokalnimi zahtevami ter imajo skromnejše, okolju prijazne cilje, na koncu prevzela obnovo sektorja, ko bo vzpostavljen red in bodo spoštovani regulativni mehanizmi.
It will no doubt be the rather smaller building companies who act in a sustainable manner, in association with local requirements and more modest yet environmentally sound objectives who will ultimately emerge to regenerate the industry when once order and regulatory mechanisms are established and respected.
Odbor za peticije ima na stotine posameznih študij primerov v dokumentih, ki so jih vložili pisci peticij.
The Petitions Committee has hundreds of individual case studies contained in the documents submitted by petitioners.
Pokrivajo številne različne situacije, kar je razvidno iz tabele, ki je priložena temu poročilu.
They cover a rather wide variety of specific situations as can be seen in the table which is annexed to this report.
Večino peticij so vložili posamezniki v imenu prebivalcev določene skupnosti, nekatere imajo širšo podporo, nekatere pa so vložile ranljive starejše osebe, ki se bojijo, da bodo njihove življenjske prihranke, ki so jih vložili v dom za ostarele, pogoltnili brezvestni in neodgovorni lokalni posredniki.
Most petitions have been submitted by individuals on behalf of the residents of a particular community; others have a wider basis of support, some are from very vulnerable elderly persons who feel afraid that their life savings, invested in their retirement home, is to be swallowed up by unscrupulous and irresponsible local dealers.
Odbor za peticije je skušal peticije razvrstiti tako, da bi tisti, ki lahko poskrbijo za rešitve, pravne ali politične, lažje prepoznali težave, s katerimi se soočajo evropski državljani.
The Petitions Committee has tried to categorise these petitions in order to make the problems faced by European citizens more easily identifiable to those with the power to deliver solutions, whether the remedy be legal or political.
V resoluciji so bile predlagane nekatere poti, ki bi jih lahko izkoristili, da bi evropskim državljanom zagotovili ustrezna nadomestila za njihove izgube, ki so posledica lova na zemljo.
It has, in the resolution suggested certain avenues which could be explored in order to ensure that European citizens are properly compensated for their losses as a result of the land-grab which has been practised.
Predvsem poziva k večji pravni varnosti in večjemu spoštovanju zakonitih lastnikov nepremičnin in njihovih pravic.
Above all it is calling for more legal certainty and greater respect for legitimate property owners and their rights.
Treba je ponovno vzpostaviti zaupanje v španski pravosodni sistem, zlasti ob upoštevanju izjav pomembnih članov odvetniške zbornice Valencie, ki so jasno povedali, da za žrtve masivne urbanizacje ne obstajajo pravne rešitve.
Confidence in the Spanish judicial system needs to be restored particularly in the light of statements made by prominent members of the Valencian Bar who said clearly that there was no legal remedy for victims of massive urbanisation.
To je tako v interesu državljanov kot skupnosti.
This is in the interests of citizens and municipalities alike.
Poziva, naj se dajo na razpolago natančnejše informacije in naj bo vse dogajanje preglednejše, posledice za lastnike nepremičnin pa naj bodo jasno prikazane.
It is calling for more precise information to be made available and for all developments to be made more transparent with the implications for property owners made clear.
Morebitne spremembe morajo biti upravičene in razumne, ne pa samovoljne, kot se sedaj pogosto dogaja.
Where charges are to be incurred these must be justifiable and reasonable; not arbitrary, which is too often the case at the moment.
Nobeni osebi se ne sme odreči njene lastnine ali njenega doma brez predpisanega postopka in ustreznega nadomestila v skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, ki jih morajo spoštovati vse države članice v skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
No person should be deprived of their land or their homes without due process and adequate and proper compensation, in conformity with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights which all Member States are bound to respect under Article 6(2) of the Treaty on the European Union.
Odbor poziva pristojne oblasti v Španiji, naj ponovno pregledajo in po potrebi revidirajo zakonodajo, da bi zagotovile pravice iz pogodbe za lastnike nepremičnin, ter odpovejo vse dejavnosti, pri katerih se ne spoštuje ali izvaja pravo EU.
The Committee asks the responsible authorities in Spain to look again and eventually revise legislation where necessary to guarantee the rights contained in the Treaty for property owners, and to cancel all developments where EU law is not respected or applied.
V resoluciji se navaja člen 33 španske ustave; vendar njegovo določbe niso bile jasno opredeljene pri njihovi uporabi na ustavnem sodišču, ko se uporabljajo za projekte masivne urbanizacije.
Article 33 of the Spanish Constitution is cited in the resolution; yet its provisions have not been clearly defined in their application by the Constitutional Court as they apply to massive urbanisation projects.
Nove urbanizacijske načrte, ki ne spoštujejo trajnosti okolja in družbene odgovornosti ter pravic zakonitih lastnikov nepremičnin je treba opustiti ali pregledati.
New urbanisation plans which do not respect environmental sustainability and social responsibility and the rights of legitimate property owners should be suspended and reviewed.
Vloga urbanističnih agentov in pogoji po katerih so jih lokalni organi izbrali na javnem razpisu so bili predmet številnih peticij, sedaj pa so v postopku ugotavljanja kršitve pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti.
The role of the urbanising agent and the conditions under which tenders have been granted to them by local authorities has been the subject of many petitions and is currently the subject of infringement proceedings before the European Court of Justice.
Zato vaša poročevalka tega ne bo nadalje komentirala, povedala pa bi, da je odbor popolnoma podpiral Evropsko komisijo pri tem ukrepu, prav tako pa so jo podpirali mnogi pisci peticij.
For that reason your rapporteur will not comment any further except to say that the Committee has supported the European Commission fully with this action as have many petitioners.
Odbor razume in podpira španske oblasti v njihovih prizadevanjih za ohranjanje in, kjer je mogoče, obnovitev obalnega okolja.
The Committee understands and supports the Spanish authorities in their attempts to preserve and where possible restore the coastal environment.
Ne razume pa, zakaj so na tej stopnji in v tem času znova oživili zakon o obalnih območjih, ki je bil v mirovanju trideset let, kar je omogočilo, da je prišlo do vsega tega uničenja..
What it fails to understand is why the 1988 Coastal Law has been resurrected at this stage, in this time, when it has been in practical abeyance for thirty years when so much devastation took place.
Zakaj je njegova uporaba tako nejasna in samovoljna, med tem pa se rušijo tradicionalni obalni objekti in dovoljuje izgradnja novih, sodobnih stanovanj?
Why is its application such a shambles and so arbitrary when traditional coastal housing is being demolished and newly developed modern apartments being tolerated?
Zakaj je bilo ljudem dovoljeno, da so v zadnjih tridesetih letih kupili take nepremičnine, pri čemer so spoštovali vse zakonske zahteve, s katerimi so se soočili, danes pa so soočeni z zakonom, ki ima retroaktiven učinek in jim odreka pravice, povezane z zakonitim lastništvom?
Why were people allowed to buy such property during the last thirty years, respecting all the legal requirements with which they were faced, only to be confronted today with a law with retro-active effect which denies them the rights associated with legitimate ownership?
Prav bi bilo, da bi bili kaznovani špekulanti in nepremičninski investitorji, ki so imeli na razpolago pravne vire, da bi lahko ustrezno ravnali, ne pa ljudje, ki so v dobri veri kupili lastnino, pri tem pa spoštovali vse zahteve, izgubili svoje pravice ter pravice njihovih družin in naslednikov njihovih domov.
That speculators and property developers who had the legal resources to know better should be penalised is reasonable; what is not is that people who have bought their property in good faith respecting all the demands made upon them should lose their rights, and that of their families and descendents to their homes.
Evropska komisija lahko uporabi postopek za ugotavljanje kršitve, da zagotovi, da država članica spoštuje svoje obveznosti iz pogodb ali po pogojih iz direktiv EU.
The European Commission may use the infringement procedure to ensure the compliance of a Member State with its responsibilities under the Treaties or under the terms of EU Directives.
Evropski parlament, ki nima na razpolago tega orožja, lahko v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih uporabi proračunski organ, da doseže podoben rezultat, če se za to odloči.
The European Parliament, which does not have this weapon at its disposal, may, in duly justifiable cases, use its budgetary authority to achieve similar ends if it decides to do so.
Na tej stopnji zadostuje povedati, da je veliko primerov, ko je masivna urbanizacija vključila elemente financiranja EU za novo infrastrukturo v splošni program, da bi Parlamentu in njegovemu Odboru za proračunski nadzor omogočila podrobnejši vpogled v potek, če ne bi prišlo do napredka glede zadev, ki so jih pred Evropskim parlamentom izpostavili vlagatelji peticij.
Suffice it to say at this stage that there are many instances where massive urbanisation has incorporated elements of EU funding for new infrastructure into the overall programme to allow the Parliament, and its Budgetary Control Committee, to look into such cases more closely if progress is not made to resolve the issues raised by the petitioners with the European Parliament.
Kot poročevalka seveda močno upam, da to ne bo potrebno.
As rapporteur I naturally very much hope that this will not be necessary.
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE O PRAVNI PODLAGI
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASE
Odbor za pravne zadeve v nadaljevanju navaja pripombe glede nekaterih strogo pravnih vidikov zgoraj navedenega predloga poročila.
The Committee on Legal Affairs has the following observations to make on certain strictly legal aspects of the draft report cited above.
Predlog poročila, ki ga je pripravila poročevalka Odbora za peticije vsebuje nekaj zmotnih prepričanj glede obsega in izvajanja nacionalne zakonodaje, ki bi lahko zavedla bralce, tako da bi precenili, kaj lahko Evropska unija naredi v primerih, ko države članice ali nacionalni organi domnevno kršijo temeljne pravice, kot je določeno v Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
The draft report drawn up by the rapporteur of the Petitions Committee contains certain misconceptions as to the scope and applicability of national law which are liable to mislead its readers into overestimating what the European Union can do in cases where a Member State or national authorities have allegedly acted in breach of fundamental rights as set out in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union .
Da bi institucije Skupnosti (Komisija, Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti) lahko ukrepale proti državi članici v takih okoliščinah, se mora kršitev temeljne pravice nanašati na izvrševanje pristojnosti Skupnosti.
In order for the Community institutions (the Commission, the Court of Justice) to be able to act against a Member State in such circumstances, the violation of a fundamental right must be referable to the exercise of Community competence.
Samo dejstvo, da so nekateri ljudje, ki trdijo, da so bili oškodovani zaradi domnevne kršitve temeljne pravice iz EKČP in Listine, uveljavili svoje pravice do prostega gibanja ali do ustanavljanja, ki jih imajo kot državljani Skupnosti, ne zadostuje, da bi zadeva spadala v pristojnost Skupnosti.
The mere fact that some of the persons who purportedly suffered injury as a result of an alleged infringement of a fundamental right enshrined in the ECHR and the Charter had exercised their Community rights of free movement or freedom of establishment does not suffice to bring the matter within the jurisdiction of the Community.
Kar zadeva domnevno kršitev pravice do lastnine (člen 1 prvega dodatnega protokola k EKČP), predlog poročila ne dokazuje nobene povezave s pravom Skupnosti.
As regards the alleged breach of the right to property (Article 1 of the first Additional Protocol to the ECHR), the draft report fails to show any connection whatsoever with Community law.
Nadalje je navedba iz uvodne izjave I predloga poročila, da zadeva o pristojnost Skupnosti v zvezi s pravicami intelektualne lastnine ob upoštevanju člena 295
Furthermore, the statement in recital I of the draft report that a case on the Community's competence with regard to intellectual property rights having regard to Article 295 of the
Terranova [1976] Zbirka odločb sodne prakse 1039) kaže, da je treba pristojnost države članice glede lastninskopravnega sistema vedno uporabljati v povezavi s temeljnimi načeli prava Skupnosti, kot so prosti pretok blaga, oseb, storitev in kapitala, dokaz za temeljno nerazumevanje sodne prakse za člen 295.
(Case 119/75 Terrapin v. Terranova [1976] ECR 1039) shows that the competence of the Member States in respect of the system of property ownership "must always be applied in conjunction with the fundamental principles of Community law, such as the free of movement of goods, persons, services and capital" betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the case-law on Article 295.
Sodna praksa se nanaša na primere, ko se Skupnost, pri izvajanju svojih pristojnosti (za prosti pretok blaga, itd.), na nek način ptertvarja, da vpliva ali omejuje ali nadzira uveljavljanje premoženjske pravice, kot dovoljuje člen 1 prvega dodatnega protokola EKČP.
That case-law is concerned with instances where the Community, in the exercise of Community competence (over free movement of goods, etc), purported in some way to influence or limit or control the exercise of property rights, as is permitted by Article 1 of the first Additional Protocol to the ECHR.
Sodišče dejansko dosledno potrjuje, da čeprav je lastninska pravica sestavni del splošnih načel prava Skupnosti, ni absolutna pravica in jo je treba razumeti v povezavi z njeno družbeno funkcijo in se torej njeno izvajanje lahko omeji, pod pogojem, da se omejitve dejansko skladajo s cilji splošnega interesa, za katere se zavzema Skupnost, ter ne povzročajo prekomernega in nedopustnega posega, ki bi ogrožal samo bistvo zagotovljenih pravic (zadeva C-491/01 British American Tobacco (Investments) in Imperial Tobacco [2002] Zbirka odločb sodne prakse I-11453).
Indeed, as the Court has consistently held, "while the right of property forms part of the general principles of Community law, it is not an absolute right and must be viewed in relation to its social function and whereas, consequently, its exercise may be restricted, provided that those restrictions in fact correspond to objectives of general interest pursued by the Community and do not constitute a disproportionate and intolerable interference, impairing the very substance of the rights guaranteed" (Case C-491/01 British American Tobacco (Investments) and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453).
Šele kot zadnja možnost, ko so bile vse druge že izčrpane, je možno zadevo predložiti na Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice.
It is only in the last resort when all national remedies have been exhausted that it is possible to take a case to the European Court of Human Rights.
Bistvo tega je, da pri prisilni razlastitvi nepremičnine španske oblasti delujejo v skladu s špansko ustavo in zakoni, sprejetimi na podlagi ustrezne določbe ustave.
The long and short of it is that, in carrying out the compulsory purchase of real property, the Spanish authorities act in pursuance of the Spanish Constitution and laws enacted pursuant to the relevant provision of the Constitution.
To, da so bili nekateri ljudje, ki so jih zadevni ukrepi prizadeli, državljani Unije, ki so uveljavljali eno od svoboščin, ki jih zagotavlja pogodba, ne vpliva na zadevo.
The fact that some of the people affected by the measures in question were Union citizens who had exercised one of the freedoms granted by the Treaty has no bearing on the matter.
Ustrezen način za uporabo pravnih sredstev je prek španskih sodišč in, nazadnje, ko so bile vse možnosti za rešitev v domači državi izkoriščene, prek Sodišča za človekove pravice v Strasbourgu.
The proper means of seeking redress is through the Spanish courts and, ultimately, once all domestic remedies have been exhausted, the Court of Human Rights at Strasbourg.
Nazadnje se osnutek poročila nanaša na postopek Komisije proti Španiji za domnevne kršitve direktive o javnih naročilih.
Lastly, the draft report refers to proceedings brought by the Commission against Spain for alleged infringements of the public procurement directive.
Vendar obstajajo dvomi o tem, ali obstaja zadostno vzročno razmerje med domnevnim neustreznim izvajanjem te direktive in škodo, ki so jo domnevno utrpeli vlagatelji peticij.
However, it is doubted whether there is a sufficient causal relationship between the alleged improper implementation of that Directive and the damage allegedly sustained by the petitioners.
Potem ko je Odbor za pravne zadeve 12. februarja 2009 na seji proučil zadevo in o njej glasoval s 13 glasovi za
In conclusion, after examining the issue at its meeting of 12 February 2009, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 13 votes in favour