natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
PREDLAGANA SPREMEMBA POSLOVNIKA
PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE
Poročevalec je mnenja, da v tem primeru razlaga poslovnika ali smernice za njegovo lažje izvajanje niso dovolj.
Your rapporteur takes the view that in this particular case an interpretation of the Rules of Procedure or guidelines to facilitate their implementation will not suffice.
Namen predlagane nove različice člena 51 je v bistvu trojen:
The proposed new version of Rule 51 essentially seeks to achieve three objectives:
1) narediti predpis bolj čitljiv in torej primernejši za uporabo
1) Make the provision more readily understandable and therefore easier to use.
2) ponovno opredeliti pogoje za uporabo predpisa
2) Lay down new conditions governing the application of the procedure.
3) opredeliti njegovo normativno vsebino
3) Determine the scope of the procedure.
Da bi izpolnili prvi zastavljeni cilj, sedaj pogoja uporabe nista več izražena v obliki napotitve na druge predpise.
With a view to achieving the first objective, the conditions governing the application of the procedure no longer take the form of references to other provisions.
Predstavljena sta jasno in povsem razumljivo.
The two conditions are set out in a clear and immediately understandable form.
Sprememba poudarja izjemno naravo postopka s pridruženimi odbori, med drugim pa je utemeljena z ozirom na upravne in tehnične zahteve, ki izhajajo iz postopka.
The purpose of this change is to emphasise the exceptional nature of the procedure with joint committees and is justified, inter alia, by the administrative and technical workload which that procedure entails.
Tretji cilj, da se opredeli normativna vsebina člena 51 in torej praktične posledice njegove uporabe za potek zakonodajnega postopka, je težji.
The third objective, that of determining the scope of Rule 51, i.e. the practical implications of its application for the ongoing legislative procedure, is more difficult to achieve.
Zlasti je treba opredeliti, do katere stopnje naj bo postopek „skupen“: ves čas postopka ali samo v prvi obravnavi?
The key issue is to determine whether the procedure should be ‘joint’ throughout its duration or only at first reading.
Čeprav bi lahko našli praktične razloge za drugo rešitev, pa poročevalec podpira prvo.
Although there are practical arguments in favour of the second option, your rapporteur supports the first.
Če je splošno sprejeti namen novega postopka ta, da se odborom že v zgodnji fazi omogoči izmenjava argumentov in se v bolj pomembnih primerih „pripravi teren“ za plenarno zasedanje, potem v rednem zakonodajnem postopku ta logika velja za vse faze do sprejetja akta.
If, as generally accepted, the aim of the new procedure is to enable the committees concerned to exchange arguments at an early stage and to ‘prepare the ground’ for plenary when the matter at issue is particularly important, under the ordinary legislative procedure this logic applies at all stages, right up to the adoption of the act.
Skupni odbori torej v tem postopku postanejo „pristojni odbor“ v smislu poslovnika.
For the duration of the procedure the joint committees thus become the ‘committee responsible’ within the meaning of the Rules of Procedure.
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola o razširitvi varnostnih carinskih ukrepov Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Andoro
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol extending to customs security measures the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Economic Community and the Principality of Andorra
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ...........................8
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 7
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (17403/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (17403/2010),
– ob upoštevanju Protokola o razširitvi varnostnih carinskih ukrepov Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Andoro (17405/2010),
– having regard to the Protocol extending to customs security measures the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Economic Community and the Principality of Andorra (17405/2010),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 207(4) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0036/2011 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0036/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in mnenja Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0198/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0198/2011 ),
Predložitev Sklepa Sveta Parlamentu v postopek odobritve je pravni instrument za sklenitev protokola med Evropsko unijo in Kneževino Andoro, da bi Sporazum v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Andoro z dne 28. junija 1990 razširili na varnostne carinske ukrepe.
The Council Decision referral for the European Parliament for consent procedure constitutes the legal instrument for the conclusion of the Protocol between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra extending to customs security measures the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Economic Community and the Principality of Andorra concluded on 28 June 1990.
Sporazum je bil podlaga za carinsko unijo med obema podpisnicama.
The Agreement was the basis for the customs union between both parties.
Ta dogovor, ki se nanaša na varnostne carinske ukrepe, bo dodan sporazumu iz leta 1990 v obliki novega naslova IIA in bo, za razliko od carinske unije, veljal za kmetijske proizvode (člen 12b(2) Protokola).
The present arrangement concerning customs security measures will be added to the 1990 Agreement under the form of a new Title IIA and, unlike the customs union, will apply to agricultural products (Article 12b(2) of the Protocol).
Zaradi vključitve varnostnih carinskih ukrepov so bili Carinski zakonik Skupnosti in določbe za izvajanje tega zakonika, s katerimi se določijo pravila za carinsko obravnavo blaga, ki se uvaža ali bo izvoženo, spremenjeni leta 2005 in 2006.
The rules on the customs treatment of goods exported or imported, laid by the Community Customs Code and its Implementing Rules, were amended in 2005 and 2006 respectively to provide for customs security measures.
Čeprav Carinski zakonik Skupnosti načeloma velja za trgovino z vsemi nečlanicami, dopušča drugačna pravila, če mednarodni sporazumi predvidevajo posebne varnostne ureditve.
While the Community Customs Code is, in principle, applicable to trade with all non-member countries, it allows for different rules where international agreements provide for special security arrangements.
Ker v skladu s členom 12c(2) Protokola Andori ni treba uporabljati varnostnih carinskih ukrepov (določbe glede deklaracije blaga pred njegovim vstopom na carinsko območje ali izstopom iz njega, pooblaščenih gospodarskih subjektov in varnostnih carinskih kontrol ter obvladovanja tveganja na področju varnosti), opredeljenih v členu 12b(1) za prevoz blaga med carinskima območjema EU in Andore, če se podpisnici obvežeta, da jih bosta izvajali in na svojih zunanjih mejah zagotavljali enakovredno raven varnosti.
Article 12c(2) of the Protocol exempts Andorra from the obligation to apply customs security measures (provisions concerning the declaration of goods prior to their entry and exit from this customs territory, authorised economic operators, and customs security checks and risk management) set out in Article 12b(1) to the carriage of goods between the customs territories of the EU and Andorra for as long as the parties undertake to apply them and ensure an equivalent level of security at the external borders.
Pripombe poročevalca
Rapporteur's observations
Poročevalec podpira dejstvo, da je namen dogovora zagotoviti nemoten potek trgovine med podpisnicama, ob upoštevanju visoke ravni carinske varnosti, in vključiti niz pravil, s katerim bi zagotovili skladnost sporazuma in pravnega reda EU, in zato predlaga, da ga Parlament odobri.
Your Rapporteur welcomes that the arrangement is aimed at ensuring that trade between both Parties develops smoothly within a high level of customs security and that it includes a set of rules to ensure that the Agreement and the EU acquis remain in alignment, and therefore proposes that Parliament gives its assent.
Poročevalec ugotavlja, da člen 12f Protokola predvideva, da bo izvajanje Protokola spremljal skupni odbor.
Your Rapporteur notes that Article 12f of the Protocol provides for the monitoring of the implementation of the Protocol through the Joint Committee.
V zvezi s tem poročevalec prosi Komisijo, naj Parlament obvešča o sklepih sej skupnega odbora, o njegovih dejavnostih in o ugotovitvah iz rednih ocen.
In this respect, your Rapporteur asks the Commission to inform Parliament on the conclusions of the meetings and proceedings of the Joint Committee and the findings of the regular assessments.
Prav tako Komisijo poziva, naj se obveže, da bo Parlamentu predložila pregled izvajanja sporazuma.
Your Rapporteur also asks the Commission to commit to submitting to Parliament an implementation review of the Agreement.
Poročevalec na koncu poleg tega ugotavlja, da sklepi Sveta za splošne zadeve z dne 14. decembra 2010 poudarjajo, da so odnosi med EU in Kneževino Andoro obširni, vendar razdrobljeni, in da velik del pravnega reda, ki se nanaša na notranji trg, ni bil prenesen v zakonodajo Andore in se zato tam ne uporablja.
Finally, your Rapporteur also notes that the conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 14 December 2010 point out that relations between the EU and the Principality of Andorra are extended but fragmented, with large parts of the acquis related to the internal market not introduced in Andorran legislation and therefore not applicable.
Poročevalec podpira predlog, da se čim prej opravi analiza možnosti in pogojev postopne vključitve pravnega reda v delovanje notranjega trga.
Your Rapporteur supports that an analysis of the possibilities and modalities of its possible progressive integration into the internal market is undertaken as soon as possible.
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola o razširitvi varnostnih carinskih ukrepov Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Andoro
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol extending to customs security measures the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Economic Community and the Principality of Andorra
Vsebina predloga
The main content of the proposal
Andora in Evropska unija od leta 1990 tvorita carinsko unijo, ki temelji na sporazumu v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Andoro.
Andorra and the EU form a Customs Union since 1990 which is based on the agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Economic Community and the Principality of Andorra.
S sporazumom je nastala carinska unija za nekmetijske proizvode (proizvodi, ki se uvrščajo v poglavja 25 do 97 harmoniziranega sistema).
The agreement establishes a customs union for non-agricultural goods (products falling within Chapters 25 to 97 of the Harmonised System).
Predlog je povezan s predlogi sprememb Carinskega zakonika Skupnosti in določb za izvajanje tega zakonika v zvezi z varnostnimi ukrepi za blago, ki se izvaža v države, ki niso članice EU, ali uvaža iz njih.
The proposal is related to the amendments to the Community Customs Code and its Implementing Rules, concerning customs security measures for goods that are exported to or imported from non-EU countries.
Najpomembneje je, da spremembe vsebujejo določbo, da gospodarski subjekti pred uvozom in uvozom blaga predložijo nekatere podatke.
Most importantly, the changes contain a provision that traders should submit certain information prior to importing or exporting goods.
Ob upoštevanju sprememb ustreznega carinskega pravnega reda EU predlog ustvarja poseben režim med EU in Andoro, ki zagotavlja nemoteno trgovino med obema stranema in hkrati ohranja visoko raven varnosti.
Taking into account the changes in the relevant EU customs acquis, the proposal establishes a special regime between the EU and Andorra to ensure that trade runs smoothly between the two parties while maintaining a high level of security.
Predlagana pravila o carinski varnosti v dvostranski trgovini med EU in Andoro predvidevajo odpravo zahteve o predhodni deklaraciji blaga pod pogojem, da EU in Andora vsaka na svojem ozemlju zagotovita enako raven varnosti, kot jo določa ustrezni pravni red.
The proposed rules on customs security in the bilateral trade between the EU and Andorra foresee that the requirement of prior declaration of goods is abolished on the condition that the EU and Andorra guarantee in their respective territories an eqivalent level of security as provided by the respective acquis.
Člen 12i(2) sporazuma andorskim strokovnjakom omogoča, da lahko kot opazovalci sodelujejo na sestankih Odbora za carinski zakonik, če se razpravlja o zadevah, ki jih zadevajo.
Article 12i, paragraph 2 of the arrangement enables Andorran experts to participate as observers in meetings of the Customs Code Committee, in as far as items concerning them are discussed.
V okviru postopka odobritve lahko Parlament le zavrne oziroma potrdi predlagani akt na podlagi priporočila svojega pristojnega odbora, v tem primeru Odbora za mednarodno trgovino (INTA), na katerega Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov naslavlja to mnenje.
Under the consent procedure, Parliament can only either reject or approve the act being proposed, on the basis of a recommendation from the committee responsible – in this case the Committee on International Trade (INTA), to which the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection has submitted this opinion.
Poročevalec pozdravlja dejstvo, da predlog vključuje sklop ukrepov, ki zagotavljajo, da sporazum ostane v skladu z razvojem ustreznega pravnega reda EU.
Your Rapporteur welcomes that the proposal includes a set of measures to ensure that the agreement remains in alignment with the development of the relevant EU acquis .
Poročevalec poziva Komisijo in Andoro, naj nadaljujeta pogovore ter upoštevata in po potrebi sprejmeta dvostranske sporazume za tekoče izvajanje posodobljenega Carinskega zakonika, ki naj bi bil znotraj EU dokončan najkasneje do 24. junija 2013.
Your Rapporteur calls on both the Commission and Andorra to engage in further talks in order to take into account and if necessary to adapt bilateral arrangements to the ongoing implementation of the Modernised Customs Code, which should be completed within the EU by 24 June 2013 at the latest.
Poročevalec opozarja, da velik del notranjega trga ostaja izven obstoječih sporazumov, zlasti v povezavi s storitvami, z delom in s kapitalom.
Your Rapporteur notes that large parts of the internal market remain outside the existing agreements, especially as regards services, labour and capital.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bila nadaljnja širitev notranjega trga s skupnimi regulativnimi standardi na Andoro v obojestransko korist državljanov in podjetij v EU in Andori ter da sporazum ne bi smel negativno vplivati na delovanje notranjega trga.
Your Rapporteur believes that a further extension of the internal market with common regulatory standards to Andorra should be to the mutual benefit of citizens and businesses in the EU and Andorra, and that the agreement should not have any negative impact on the functioning of the Internal Market.
Poročevalec nadalje meni, da je obstoječ institucionalni okvir odnosov med EU in Andoro še vedno razdrobljen.
Your Rapporteur furthermore considers that the existing institutional framework of EU-Andorra relations remains fragmented.
Spodbuja Komisijo in Andoro, naj nadaljujeta dialog, da bi usmerjali in nadalje razvijali odnose med EU in Andoro ob upoštevanju izkušenj z različnimi institucionalnimi modeli širitve notranjega trga izven EU (npr. sporazum o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, dvostranski sporazum EU-Švica itn.).
He encourages the Commission and Andorra to continue a dialogue in order to streamline and further develop the relations between the EU and Andorra, taking into account the experiences with different institutional models of extending the internal market beyond the EU (e.g. EEA agreement, EU-Swiss bilateral agreements etc.).
Poročevalec meni, da je treba spremeniti pravno podlago osnutka sklepa Sveta s črtanjem sklicevanja na člen 218(7) Pogodbe o delovanju EU.
Your Rapporteur considers that it is necessary to correct the legal basis of the draft Council decision by deleting the reference to Article 218(7) TFEU.
Sporočeno mu je bilo, da se Svet strinja, da bo poslal popravek, kjer bo člen 218(7) umaknjen.
He has been informed that the Council has agreed to send a corrigendum, where Art. 218(7) TFEU has been withdrawn.
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov poziva Odbor za mednarodno trgovino kot pristojni odbor, da Parlamentu priporoči, naj da svojo odobritev.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament give its consent.
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Róża grofica von Thun und Hohenstein (Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein), Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Ashley Fox, María Irigoyen Pérez, Constance Le Grip, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Olle Schmidt
Ashley Fox, María Irigoyen Pérez, Constance Le Grip, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Konstantinos Poupakis, Sylvana Rapti, Olle Schmidt
William (grof) Dartmouthski (William (The Earl of) Dartmouth), David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Marielle De Sarnez, Harlem Désir, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Niccolò Rinaldi, Tokia Saïfi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Iuliu Winkler, Jan Zahradil, Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Paweł Zalewski
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Marielle De Sarnez, Harlem Désir, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Niccolò Rinaldi, Tokia Saïfi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Iuliu Winkler, Jan Zahradil, Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Paweł Zalewski
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o spremembi Odločbe 2004/162/ES, kar zadeva izdelke, ki so upravičeni do oprostitve ali znižanja pristaniških pristojbin
on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2004/162/EC as regards the products that may benefit from exemption from or a reduction in dock dues
Poročevalka: Elie Hoarau
Rapporteur: Elie Hoarau
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2010)0749 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2010)0749 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 349 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7–0022/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7-0022/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7–0199/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0199/2011 ),
Člen 349 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (nekdanji člen 299-2 Pogodbe o ES) določa, da Evropski svet na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom zaradi gospodarskih in socialnih razmer v najbolj oddaljenih regijah sprejme posebne ukrepe v korist teh regij.
Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (former Article 229(2) of the EC Treaty) authorises the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting Parliament, to adopt specific measures for the benefit of the Union’s outermost regions, taking account of their social and economic situation.
Trajne ovire, kot so otoška lega, oddaljenost od velikih trgov, majhna površina, težak relief in zahtevne podnebne razmere, ekonomska odvisnost od majhnega števila proizvodov zelo ogrožajo njihov razvoj in popolnoma opravičujejo izvajanje prilagojenih ukrepov.
The fact that these regions are permanently disadvantaged by their insularity, remoteness from major markets, small size, difficult topography and climate and their economic dependence on a small number of products severely hinders their development and fully justifies the implementation of specially tailored measures.
Na tem temelji tako imenovani režim pristaniških pristojbin, ki Franciji v njenih štirih čezmorskih departmajih do 1. julija 2014 omogoča različno stopnjo pristaniških pristojbin za nekatere proizvode iz čezmorskih departmajev.
Such is the basis for the so-called ‘dock dues’ system, under which France is authorised, until 1 July 2014, to apply differential rates of the tax known as ‘dock dues’ to certain products manufactured in its four overseas departments (ODs).
Poročilo o režimu pristaniških pristojbin nastopi po tem, ko je Francija predstavila vmesno poročilo o izvajanju pristaniških pristojbin v skladu s členom 4 Odločbe 2004/162/ES.
This report on the dock dues system follows the submission by France of a mid-term report on its implementation, in accordance with Article 4 of Decision 2004/162/EC.
Izvajanje je nadvse pozitivno glede na zastavljene cilje: pospeševanje in ohranjanje lokalnih ekonomskih dejavnosti ob upoštevanju omejitev najbolj oddaljenih regij ter pozitiven vpliv na ohranjanje delovnih mest.
The impact of the system was found to have been largely positive in terms of the objectives set out in that decision, namely to promote or maintain local economic activities, in the light of the handicaps affecting the outermost regions, and to make a positive contribution to maintaining employment.
V predlogu Komisije (ki mu je priložen predlog sklepa Sveta) je navedeno, naj se na podlagi utemeljitev francoskih oblasti na seznam proizvodov z različno stopnjo obdavčitve doda približno 50 proizvodov za Gvajano.
The Commission proposal, accompanied by a proposal for a Council decision, suggests, in the case of French Guiana, extending the list of products to which differentiated taxation may be applied by some 50 products, on the basis of justifications supplied by the French authorities.
Evropski parlament podpira ta predlog brez sprememb.
The European Parliament approves the Commission proposal without amendment.
Pristaniške pristojbine so življenjskega pomena za ekonomsko stabilnost najbolj oddaljenih regij.
The dock dues system is crucially important to the economic stability of the outermost regions concerned.