natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za namene odstavka 1 Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku sprejmeta ukrepe za skupni evropski azilni sistem, ki zajema:
For the purposes of paragraph 1, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt measures for a common European asylum system comprising:
(e) merila in mehanizme za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošenj za azil ali subsidiarno zaščito;
(e) criteria and mechanisms for determining which Member State is responsible for considering an application for asylum or subsidiary protection;
Unija oblikuje skupno politiko priseljevanja, s katero v vseh fazah zagotovi učinkovito upravljanje migracijskih tokov, pravično obravnavo državljanov tretjih držav, ki zakonito prebivajo v državah članicah, in preprečevanje nezakonitega priseljevanja in trgovine z ljudmi ter okrepljene ukrepe za boj proti temu.
The Union shall develop a common immigration policy aimed at ensuring, at all stages, the efficient management of migration flows, fair treatment of third-country nationals residing legally in Member States , and the prevention of, and enhanced measures to combat, illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings.
(d) lažje sodelovanje med sodnimi ali drugimi enakovrednimi organi držav članic pri kazenskih postopkih in izvrševanju odločb.
(d) facilitate cooperation between judicial or equivalent authorities of the Member States in relation to proceedings in criminal matters and the enforcement of decisions.
Člen 87
Article 87
Unija vzpostavi policijsko sodelovanje, ki vključuje vse pristojne organe držav članic, vključno s policijskimi, carinskimi in drugimi tovrstnimi specializiranimi službami kazenskega pregona, pri preprečevanju ali odkrivanju kaznivih dejanj in preiskav.
The Union shall establish police cooperation involving all the Member States’ competent authorities, including police, customs and other specialised law enforcement services in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences.
Za namene iz odstavka 1 lahko Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku določita ukrepe glede:
For the purposes of paragraph 1, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may establish measures concerning:
(a) zbiranja, hrambe, obdelave, analize in izmenjave ustreznih informacij;
(a) the collection, storage, processing, analysis and exchange of relevant information;
Predlaga se, naj se dodajo sledeči členi:
The following Articles are proposed to be added:
Člen 85
Article 85
Naloga Eurojusta je podpirati in krepiti koordinacijo in sodelovanje nacionalnih organov, pristojnih za preiskave in pregon hudih oblik kriminala, ki se nanašajo na dve ali več držav članic ali zahtevajo skupni pregon, na podlagi postopkov, ki jih izvajajo, in informacij, ki jih pošljejo organi držav članic in Europol.
Eurojust’s mission shall be to support and strengthen coordination and cooperation between national investigating and prosecuting authorities in relation to serious crime affecting two or more Member States or requiring a prosecution on common bases, on the basis of operations conducted and information supplied by the Member States’ authorities and by Europol.
V tej zvezi Evropski parlament in Svet z uredbami, sprejetimi po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, določita strukturo, delovanje, področje ukrepanja in naloge Eurojusta.
In this context, the European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall determine Eurojust’s structure, operation, field of action and tasks.
(a) uvedbo kazenskih preiskav, kakor tudi predlog uvedbe pregona, ki ga izvajajo pristojni nacionalni organi, zlasti v primeru kršitev finančnih interesov Unije;
(a) the initiation of criminal investigations, as well as proposing the initiation of prosecutions conducted by competent national authorities, particularly those relating to offences against the financial interests of the Union;
(b) koordinacijo preiskav in pregona iz točke (a);
(b) the coordination of investigations and prosecutions referred to in point (a);
(c) krepitev pravosodnega sodelovanja, skupaj z reševanjem sporov o pristojnosti in s tesnim sodelovanjem z Evropsko pravosodno mrežo.
(c) the strengthening of judicial cooperation, including by resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction and by close cooperation with the European Judicial Network.
S temi uredbami se določijo tudi podrobnosti glede sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov držav članic pri ocenjevanju dejavnosti Eurojusta.
These regulations shall also determine arrangements for involving the European Parliament and national Parliaments in the evaluation of Eurojust’s activities.
Evropski parlament in Svet z uredbami, sprejetimi po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, določita strukturo, delovanje, področje ukrepanja in naloge Europola.
The European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall determine Europol’s structure, operation, field of action and tasks.
(a) zbiranje, hrambo, obdelavo, analizo in izmenjavo informacij, ki so jih posredovali predvsem organi držav članic ali tretjih držav oziroma služb;
(a) the collection, storage, processing, analysis and exchange of information, in particular that forwarded by the authorities of the Member States or third countries or bodies;
(b) usklajevanje, organizacijo in izvajanje preiskovalnih in operativnih dejanj, ki se izvajajo skupaj s pristojnimi organi držav članic ali v okviru skupnih preiskovalnih ekip, po potrebi v povezavi z Eurojustom.
(b) the coordination, organisation and implementation of investigative and operational action carried out jointly with the Member States’ competent authorities or in the context of joint investigative teams, where appropriate in liaison with Eurojust.
S temi uredbami se določijo tudi postopki za nadzor dejavnosti Europola, ki ga opravlja Evropski parlament skupaj z nacionalnimi parlamenti.
These regulations shall also lay down the procedures for scrutiny of Europol’s activities by the European Parliament, together with national Parliaments.
III - Predlagana pravna podlaga
III - The proposed legal bases
Člen 74 PDEU, ki se nanaša na postopek iz člena 76 PDEU za področje policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, določa splošno pravilo glede upravnega sodelovanja med pristojnimi organi držav članic.
Article 74 TFEU, which refers to the procedure in Article 76 TFEU for the areas of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and of police cooperation, sets out the general rule on administrative cooperation between the relevant departments of the Member States.
V skladu s tema dvema členoma ukrepe sprejme Svet sam, s Parlamentom pa se o njih le posvetuje.
According to these two articles, the Council alone adopts measures, and the Parliament is merely consulted.
Pri tem je treba omeniti, da Svet po členu 16(3) PEU odloča s kvalificirano večino, saj člen 76 PDEU ne določa drugače.
It is however important to note that by virtue of Article 16(3) TEU the Council acts by a qualified majority given that Article 76 TFEU does not provide otherwise.
Členi 77-79, 82 in 87 obravnavajo zadevna področja, kjer ima Parlament vlogo sozakonodajalca.
Articles 77-79, 82 and 87 all deal with relevant areas where the Parliament is co-legislator.
Člena 85 in 88 pa zadevata strukturo, delovanje, področje ukrepanja in naloge Eurojusta in Europola, pri določanju katerih ima Parlament vlogo sozakonodajalca.
Articles 85 and 88, finally, concern the structure, operation, field of action and tasks of Eurojust and Europol, to be determined with Parliament as co-legislator.
Pri tem velja omeniti, da oba člena predpisujeta, naj uredbe, ki so sprejete na njihovi podlagi, določajo postopke za nadzor nad agencijama, ki ga izvaja Parlament skupaj z nacionalnimi parlamenti.
It could be noted that both these articles require that regulations adopted on their basis lay down the procedures for scrutiny of the two agencies by Parliament, together with national parliaments.
IV - Sodna praksa o pravni podlagi
IV - Case-law on legal basis
Iz ustaljene sodne prakse Sodišča izhaja, da mora izbira pravne podlage akta Skupnosti temeljiti na objektivnih dejstvih, ki jih je mogoče sodno preskusiti, kar zlasti velja za cilj in vsebino ukrepa.
It is settled case law of the Court of Justice that "the choice of legal basis for a Community measure must rest on objective factors amenable to judicial review, which include in particular the aim and content of the measure"
Zadeva C-45/86, Komisija proti Svetu (Splošni tarifni preferenciali) [1987], ZOdl 1439, odst.
Case C-45/86, Commission v. Council (Generalised Tariff Preferences) [1987] ECR 1439, para.
5; zadeva C-440/05, Komisija proti Svetu [2007], ECR I – 9097; zadeva C-411/06, Komisija proti Parlamentu in Svetu (8. september 2009) (
5; Case C-440/05 Commission v. Council [2007] E.C.R. I-9097; Case C-411/06 Commission v. Parliament and Council (8 September 2009) (
UL C 267, 7.11.2009, str.
OJ C 267 of
Izbira neustrezne pravne podlage je lahko torej razlog za razveljavitev zadevnega akta.
The choice of an incorrect legal basis may therefore justify the annulment of the act at stake.
V - Cilj in vsebina predlagane uredbe
V. Aim and content of the proposed regulation
Uvodne izjave predlagane uredbe določajo namen, kot sledi:
The recitals to the proposed regulation set out the aim as follows:
(a) Za dosego sinergije je treba zagotoviti, da sisteme SIS II, VIS in EURODAC operativno upravlja en subjekt, in sicer v obliki regulativne agencije, ki je pravna oseba.
(a) With a view to achieving synergies, it is necessary to provide for the operational management of SIS II, VIS and EURODAC in one entity, in the form of a regulatory agency having legal personality;
(b) Agencija je lahko odgovorna tudi za pripravo, razvoj in operativno upravljanje dodatnih obsežnih informacijskih sistemov na podlagi ustreznega pravnega instrumenta pri uporabi naslova V PDEU in naj bi bila odgovorna za spremljanje raziskav in pilotnih projektov za obsežne informacijske sisteme pri uporabi naslova V PDEU.
(b) This Agency may also be made responsible for the preparation, development and operational management of additional large-scale IT systems on the basis of a relevant legislative instrument in application of Title V of TFEU and would be responsible for monitoring of research and for pilot schemes for large-scale IT systems in application of Title V of TFEU;
(c) Agencija mora sodelovati z drugimi agencijami Evropske unije v okviru njihovih pristojnosti, zlasti z agencijami, ustanovljenimi na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
(c) Within the framework of their respective competences, the Agency should cooperate with other agencies of the European Union, especially agencies established in the area of freedom, security and justice;
(d) Več uvodnih izjav določa upravni okvir, v katerem naj bi agencija delovala.
(d) Several recitals set out the administrative framework under which the Agency would operate;
(e) Posebna ureditev sedaj velja za Dansko, Združeno kraljestvo, Irsko, Norveško, Islandijo, Švico in Lihtenštajn.
(e) There are special arrangements insofar as Denmark, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and Liechtenstein are concerned.
Omenjeno sporazumno besedilo z dne 11. marca 2011 vključuje sledeči dve novi uvodni izjavi:
The above-mentioned compromise text of 11 March 2011 includes the following two new Recitals:
"(11a) Kar zadeva SIS II, morata imeti Evropski policijski urad (Europol) in Eurojust na sestankih upravnega odbora status opazovalca, kadar so na dnevnem redu vprašanja, povezana z uporabo Sklepa 2007/533/PNZ, saj imata na podlagi Sklepa 2007/533/PNZ oba pravico do dostopa in neposrednega iskanja podatkov, vnesenih v SIS II.
"(11a) As regards SIS II, the European Police Office (Europol) and Eurojust, both having the right to access and search directly data entered into SIS II in application of Decision 2007/533/JHA, should have observer status at the meetings of the Management Board when a question in relation to the application of Decision 2007/533/JHA is on the agenda.
(11b) Kar zadeva VIS, je treba Europolu odobriti status opazovalca na sestankih upravnega odbora, kadar so na dnevnem redu vprašanja v zvezi z uporabo Sklepa 2008/633/PNZ.
(11b) As regards VIS, Europol should be granted observer status at the meetings of the Management Board, when a question in relation to the application of Decision 2008/633/JHA, is on the agenda.
Europolu je treba omogočiti, da imenuje predstavnika v svetovalno skupino za VIS, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 16(1)(b).
Europol should be able to appoint a representative to the VIS Advisory Group established under Article 16(1)(b)."
Normativne določbe so sledeče:
The enacting terms are as follows:
Člen 1 predpisuje ustanovitev agencije.
Article 1 provides for the establishment of the Agency.
Členi od 2 do 6 predpisujejo naloge agencije v zvezi s sistemi SIS II, VIS in EURODAC ter s spremljanjem raziskav in pilotnih projektov.
Articles 2-6 set out the tasks to be performed by the Agency relating to SIS II, VIS and EURODAC as well as monitoring of research and pilot schemes.
Členi od 7 do 16 določajo strukturo in organizacijo agencije, členi od 17 do 27 predpisujejo njeno delovanje, členi od 28 do 31 pa vsebujejo finančne določbe.
Articles 7-16 deal with the structure and organisation of the Agency, Articles 17-27 set out provisions on its operation and Articles 28-31 outline the financial provisions.
Besedilo člena 12(4) je sledeče:
Article 12(4) of the proposal has the following wording:
„Europol in Eurojust imata status opazovalca na sestankih upravnega odbora, kadar je na dnevnem redu vprašanje glede SIS II v povezavi z uporabo Sklepa Sveta 2007/533/PNZ.
"Europol and Eurojust shall be granted observer status at the meetings of the Management Board when a question concerning SIS II, in relation to the application of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, is on the agenda.
Europol ima status opazovalca na sestankih upravnega odbora tudi, kadar je na dnevnem redu vprašanje glede VIS v povezavi z uporabo Sklepa Sveta 2008/633/PNZ.”
Europol shall also be granted observer status at the meetings of the Management Board when a question concerning VIS, in relation to the application of Council Decision 2008/633/JHA, is on the agenda."
Besedilo člena 16(3) je sledeče:
Article 16(3) of the proposal has the following wording:
„Europol in Eurojust lahko imenujeta vsak svojega predstavnika v svetovalno skupino za SIS II.
"Europol and Eurojust may each appoint a representative to the SIS II Advisory Group.
Europol lahko imenuje svojega predstavnika v svetovalno skupino za VIS.””
Europol may appoint a representative to the VIS Advisory Group."
Člena 12(4) in 16(3) ostajata v omenjenem sporazumnem besedilu z dne 11. marca 2011 nespremenjena.
Articles 12(4) and 16(3) remain untouched in the above-mentioned compromise text of 11 March 2011.
Preostali členi od 32 do 34 predpisujejo končne določbe in začetek veljavnosti predlagane uredbe.
The remaining Articles 32-34 set out final provisions and entry into force of the proposed regulation.
VI - Opredelitev ustrezne pravne podlage
VI - Determination of the appropriate legal basis
Ker predlagani uvodni izjavi 11a in 11b ter člena 12(4) in 16(3) določata sodelovanje Europola in Eurojusta pri vprašanjih, povezanih z delovanjem sistemov SIS II in VIS, bi predlagana uredba učinkovito predpisovala določbe v zvezi s strukturo, delovanjem, področjem ukrepanja in nalogami teh dveh organov, zaradi česar je treba dodati predlagani pravni podlagi.
Since the proposed Recitals 11a and 11b and Articles 12(4) and 16(3) provide for the participation of Europol and Eurojust in questions relating to the operation and functioning of SIS II and VIS, the proposed regulation would effectively set out provisions pertaining to the structure, operation, field of action and tasks of these two bodies, and it is therefore necessary to add the proposed legal bases.
Čeprav člena 74 in 76 PDEU za razliko od vseh drugih členov, ki predstavljajo pravno podlago, ne predpisujeta uporabe rednega zakonodajnega postopka, pa določata, da mora Svet odločati s kvalificirano večino.
Although Articles 74 and 76 TFEU, unlike all the other articles constituting the legal basis, do not provide for the application of the ordinary legislative procedure, they provide that the Council is to act by a qualified majority.
Posledično ti členi med seboj niso postopkovno nezdružljivi.
Consequently, these articles are not procedurally incompatible.
VII - Sklep in priporočilo
VII - Conclusion and recommendation
Ob upoštevanju te analize morata biti člena 85(1) in 88(2) PDEU dodana členom 74, 77(2)(a) in (b), 78(2)(e), 79(2)(c), 82(1)(d) in 87(2)(a) PDEU in skupaj z njimi tvoriti pravno podlago za predlagano uredbo.
In light of the foregoing analysis Articles 85(1) and 88(2) TFEU must be added to Articles 74, 77(2)(a) and (b), 78(2)(e), 79(2)(c), 82(1)(d) and 87(2)(a) TFEU to form the legal basis for the proposed regulation.
Odbor za pravne zadeve se je na seji dne 12. aprila 2011 soglasno
At its meeting of 12 April 2011 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Klaus-Heiner Lehne, predsednik; Evelyn Regner, podpredsednica; Piotr Borys, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Christian Engström, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Sajjad Karim, Kurt Lechner, Eva Lichtenberger, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Arlene McCarthy, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Alajos Mészáros, Angelika Niebler, Bernhard Rapkay, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka. odločil, da vam priporoči, naj spremenjeni predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi agencije za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice ( KOM(2010)0093 ) temelji na členih 74, 77(2)(a) in (b), 78(2)(e), 79(2)(c), 82(1)(d), 85(1), 87(2)(a) in 88(2) PDEU.
The following were present for the final vote:Klaus-Heiner Lehne (Chair), Evelyn Regner (Vice-Chair), Piotr Borys, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Christian Engström, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Sajjad Karim, Kurt Lechner, Eva Lichtenberger, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Arlene McCarthy, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Alajos Mészáros, Angelika Niebler, Bernhard Rapkay, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka. , to recommend to you as follows: the amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice ( COM(2010)0093 ) should be based on Articles 74, 77(2)(a) and (b), 78(2)(e), 79(2)(c), 82(1)(d), 85(1), 87(2)(a) and 88(2) TFEU.
o spremenjenem predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi agencije za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice
on the amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice
Komisija je 24. junija 2009 sprejela paket zakonodajnih predlogov za ustanovitev agencije, odgovorne za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
On 24 June 2009, the Commission adopted a legislative proposal package to establish an Agency responsible for the operational management of large-scale information technology ("IT") systems in the area of freedom, security and justice.
Po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe je bilo treba začetni zakonodajni sveženj (predlog uredbe in sklep Sveta) združiti v predlagani spremenjeni enotni predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the initial legislative package (proposals for a Regulation and a Council's Decision) needed to be merged into the proposed single amended proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Osrednja naloga agencije bo izpolnjevati naloge operativnega upravljanja za SIS II, VIS in EURODAC ter ohranjati delovanje sistemov 24 ur na dan, sedem dni v tednu in s tem zagotavljati stalen neprekinjen pretok izmenjave podatkov, ne da bi bila odgovorna za podatke, ki se vnesejo v sistem.
The Agency's core task will be to fulfil the operational management tasks for SIS II, VIS and EURODAC, keeping the systems functioning 24 hours a day, seven days a week, thus ensuring a continuous, uninterrupted flow of data exchange, without having responsibility for the data entered in the systems.
Čeprav pripravljavka mnenja podpira politične cilje, zaradi katerih se ustanavlja agencija, mora vseeno postaviti nekaj vprašanj s proračunskega vidika, ob upoštevanju, da točke, ki zadevajo poslanstvo in naloge agencije ali celo možnost njene ustanovitve, sodijo v pristojnosti vodilnega odbora.
Although supporting the political goals aimed at by the creation of the Agency, your Rapporteur must however raise some questions from the budgetary point of view, bearing in mind that the points relating to the mission and tasks of the agency or even the opportunity of the latter's creation fall under the lead Committee's remit.
Za financiranje agencije bosta v poglavju 18 02 proračuna EU oblikovani dve novi proračunski vrstici.
Two new budget lines will be created for the funding of the agency from the EU budget under Chapter 18 02.
Pričakuje se, da bodo skupni stroški do izteka finančnega okvira znašali 113 milijonov EUR, razdeljeni pa bodo, kot sledi:
Total cost until the end of the financial framework is expected to be EUR 113 million, distributed as follows:
V milijonih EUR
Million EUR
Finančni stroški skupaj
Total financial cost
Kot je omenjeno v zakonodajnem finančnem izkazu, bodo te odobritve prišle iz tistih proračunskih vrstic, ki so trenutno namenjene informacijskim sistemom: 18 02 04 "Schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS II)", 18 02 05 "Vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS)" in 18 03 11 "EURODAC".
As mentioned in the legislative financial statement, those appropriations will come from those budget lines currently devoted to the IT systems considered: 18 02 04 "Schengen Information System (SIS II)", 18 02 05 "Visa Information System (VIS)" and 18 03 11 "EURODAC".
Zato je predlog skladen z obstoječim finančnim programiranjem.
The proposal is therefore compatible with existing financial programming.
Te proračunske vrstice so za obdobje 2010–2013 oblikovane kot sledi, v skladu z zadnjimi zneski iz finančnega programiranja:
These budget lines are founded as follows for the period 2010-2013, according to the latest financial programming figures:
Ker so bile ostale odobritve (približno 288 milijonov EUR), predstavljene v proračunskih vrsticah za VIS, SISII in Eurodac, še vedno nujne, kljub ustanovitvi agencije, bi pripravljavka mnenja želela izraziti presenečenje, da celoten znesek, ki se šteje za nujnega, tudi za ustanovitev agencije, popolnoma ustreza zneskom, ki so bili v začetku predvideni v finančnem programiranju (nobenega varčevanja, nobenih dodatnih stroškov).
Since the remaining appropriations (some EUR 288 million) presented in the budget lines for VIS, SIS II and Eurodac remained necessary despite the creation of the agency, your Rapporteur would like to share her surprise that the overall amount deemed necessary, including for the creation of an agency, perfectly matches the amounts initially foreseen in the financial programming (no savings, no extra costs).
Pripravljavka mnenja bi rada tudi opozorila, da ustanovitev decentraliziranih agencij pomeni način uporabe operativnih skladov za pokritje upravnih odhodkov.
Your Rapporteur would further recall that the creation of decentralised agencies amounts to a way of using operational funds to cover administrative expenses.