natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................20
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............20
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 24
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 24
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................27
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................27
o zmogljivosti, učinkovitosti in varnosti letališč v Evropi: učinkovitejši politiki naproti
on Airport capacity and ground handling: towards a more efficiency policy
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom Akcijski načrt za zmogljivost letališč, učinkovitost in varnost v Evropi ( KOM(2006)0819 ),
– having regard to the Commission's communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - An action plan for airport capacity, efficiency and safety in Europe ( COM(2006)0819 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o uporabi Direktive Sveta 96/67/ES z dne 15. oktobra 1996 ( KOM(2006)0821 ),
– having regard to the Commission's report on the application of Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 ( COM(2006)0821 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za regionalni razvoj in Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6‑0349/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0349/2007 ),
A. ker bosta globalizacija in hitra gospodarska rast v EU povečali povpraševanje po letih (promet brez letaliških omejitev) v povprečju za 4,3 % na leto, najverjetneje pa tudi do 5,2 % na leto,
A. whereas globalisation and rapid economic growth will result, in the EU, in a growth in demand for flights (traffic without airport constraints) averaging at least 4.3% per annum and most probably as much as 5.2% per annum;
B. ker bi do leta 2025 to povzročilo 2,5-kratno povečanje povpraševanja po letih v primerjavi z letom 2003,
B. whereas, by the year 2025, this would result in a growth in demand for flights 2.5 times higher than that of 2003;
C. ker leta 2025 ob upoštevanju vseh novih naložb več kot 60 letališč ne bo moglo obvladovati običajnega povpraševanja v prometnih konicah brez ustvarjanja zamud ali zavračanja letov (zavrnjenih bi bilo 3,7 milijona letov na leto),
C. whereas in 2025, with all new investments taken into account, more than 60 airports will be unable to handle the typical busy hourly demand without generating delays or unaccommodated demand (3.7 million flights a year would then be unaccommodated);
D. ker se obstoječa letališča ne morejo širiti, kot bi bilo potrebno, bi lahko bila leta 2025 ena od možnosti za izvedbo številnih zavrnjenih letov gradnja pomožnih letališč v bližini prezasedenih letališč,
D. whereas, given that existing airports cannot expand as required, one of the ways to handle the large number of unaccommodated flights in 2025 could be the construction of relief airports in the vicinity of their congested counterparts,
E. ker bo pomanjkanje zmogljivosti in večje povpraševanje po letih verjetno ustvarilo povpraševanje po novih večjih letališčih (do 10 glede na študijo Eurocontrola) in srednje velikih letališčih (do 15 po podatkih Eurocontrola),
E. whereas the shortage of capacity and the increase in demand for flights will probably lead to demand for new major airports (up to 10 according to a Eurocontrol study) and medium-sized airports (up to 15 according to Eurocontrol),
F. ker takšen prihodnji razvoj dogodkov na področju zračnega prevoza poudarja potrebo po tem, da se predvidijo ukrepi, ki jih je treba sprejeti na ravni EU v korist državljanov Unije in gospodarstva EU kot celote,
F. whereas those future developments in the European air transport sector highlight the need to to anticipate the necessary steps to be taken at EU level for the benefit of Union citizens and of the EU economy as a whole;
G. ker so tudi učinkovite storitve zemeljske oskrbe pomembne za izboljševanje uporabe sedanje zmogljivosti letališč, saj pospešujejo njihovo prepustnost,
G. whereas efficient ground-handling services also play a part in improving the use of current airport capacity by accelerating throughput in airports;
I. ker imajo tradicionalne letalske družbe, nizkocenovne letalske družbe, čarterska podjetja, prevozniki blaga in poslovni zrakoplovi različne zahteve glede letaliških storitev in dodeljevanja slotov,
I. whereas traditional airlines, low-cost airlines, charter companies, freight companies and business aircraft have different requirements in terms of airport services and slot allocation,
J. ker je primerna prometna infrastruktura za dostop na letališča in z njih, zlasti v obliki celovitega sistema javnega prevoza, bistveni del letališke infrastrukture,
J. whereas adequate transport infrastructure to and from airports, particularly in the form of an integrated public transport system, is an essential part of airport infrastructure,
3. pozdravlja predloge Komisije in poudarja pomen letalstva kot načina prevoza, ki omogoča ozemeljsko, gospodarsko in socialno kohezijo Unije, zlasti v povezavi z oddaljenimi, obrobnimi in otoškimi regijami;
Welcomes the Commission's proposals and stresses the importance of air transport in ensuring territorial, economic and social cohesion in the Union, in particular with regard to remote, peripheral and island regions;
5. kljub temu meni, da Komisija še ni v celoti raziskala možnosti globalnega pristopa EU v zvezi s potrebo po dodatni zmogljivosti, omejitvami za prihodnje naložbe v dodatno zmogljivost ter strateškimi osmi, ki ne bi le omogočal, da se tveganje pomanjkanja zmogljivosti predvidi, ampak bi tudi zagotovil, da bi EU postala povezovalna in konkurenčna platforma za zračni prevoz na svetovni ravni;
Considers, however, that the Commission has not yet fully investigated the possibility of a global EU approach as regards the need for extra capacity, the constraints on future investments in additional capacity and the strategic axes that would not only allow the risks of a capacity crunch to be anticipated but also ensure that the EU becomes a cohesive and competitive air transport platform at global level;
7. ugotavlja, da se številna letališča Skupnosti sklicujejo na pomanjkanje prostora kot na eno izmed največjih ovir za liberalizacijo zemeljske oskrbe in učinkovitost, vendar meni, da je treba to trditev preveriti, in, kjer je potrebno, to težavo rešiti;
Notes that one of the biggest barriers to the liberalisation of groundhandling services and efficiency, as alluded to by many of the Community's airports, is a lack of space, but considers that such a contention needs to be verified and, where necessary, resolved;
9. zahteva, da Komisija pred letom 2009 poroča Parlamentu o glavnem načrtu za večjo zmogljivost letališč v Evropi; poudarja, da mora to poročilo določiti povezovalni pristop držav članic zaradi pospeševanja in usklajevanja vseh nacionalnih in čezmejnih pobud za gradnjo novih zmogljivosti letališč, namenjenih mednarodnemu prometu, boljše izrabe obstoječih zmogljivosti ter zaradi upravljanja zmogljivosti sekundarnih letališč brez poseganja v pristojnosti držav članic in Skupnosti za dodeljevanje zmogljivosti letališč;
Requests the Commission to report to Parliament before 2009 on a master plan for enhanced airport capacity in Europe; stresses that such a report should lay down a cohesive approach for Member States in order to promote and coordinate any national and cross-border initiative for building new airport capacities dedicated to international trafficand make better use of existing capacities, as well for managing secondary airport capacity, without prejudice to Member States' and Community competences to allocate airport capacities;
poudarja, da se lahko vsa vozlišča in regionalna letališča s potovanji od točke do točke na svoj način in v skladu s posebnimi omejitvami v posameznih državah članicah odzovejo na težave, povezane z okoljem, preobremenjenostjo in dostopnostjo letališč, ter da bo samo sočasen obstoj različnih modelov letališč glede na nacionalne posebnosti omogočil EU, da zadovolji potrebe na tem področju;
stresses that the hubs and the regional airports, through point-to-point journeys, can each in their own way and according to specific constraints of the various Member States respond to the environmental problems, to congestion problems and challenges facing accessibility, and that only the cohabitation of various airport models according to national specificities will enable the EU to fulfil its needs in this field;
v zvezi s tem ponovno opozarja, da je dostopnost letališč zelo pomembna ter da je uspešna integracija letališč v prometno omrežje ključni pogoj za somodalnost.
recalls in this respect that the accessibility to airports is of great importance and that their successful integration in the transport network is an essential condition for co modality.
14. poziva države članice ter regionalne in lokalne oblasti, naj pri izbiri krajev za izgradnjo letališč upoštevajo okoljske dejavnike, kot so hrup, emisije, gostota cestnega prometa v okolici letališča ter bližina skladišč goriva in podobnih snovi, ter vremenske dejavnike;
Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to take account of environmental factors when deciding where to locate airports, including noise, emissions, road traffic density in the vicinity of the airport, the proximity of fuel tanks, etc., and of meteorological factors;
Spodbujanje okolju prijazne rasti
Promoting environmentally-friendly growth
19. vztraja zlasti pri potrebi, da se razvijejo regulativni in finančni sistemi za pospeševanje naknadnega opremljanja in obnavljanja flot ter spodbujanje okoljske učinkovitosti motorjev, da bodo bolj tihi, bolj energetsko učinkoviti in da bodo manj onesnaževali okolje;
Particularly insists on the need to develop regulatory and financial schemes in order to encourage the retrofitting and renewal of fleets and promote the environmental performance of engines, the corollary of which is to render them quieter, more energy-efficient and less polluting;
Zagotavljanje pravilnega izvajanja in prilagajanja regulativnega okvira
Ensuring the correct implementation and adaptation of the regulatory framework
UL L 14, 22.1.1993, str.
OJ L 14, 22.01.1993, p.
1. ter predloži več navodil in pojasnilo besedila; zlasti vztraja pri potrebi, da se zagotovi boljše koordiniranje in usklajevanje med dodeljevanjem slotov upravljanja pretoka zračnega prometa in slotov letališča, zlasti v zvezi z učinkovitostjo odborov za koordinacijo slotov, kar zadeva odhode in prihode, ter tudi pri potrebi po uskladitvi opredelitev, dovoljenega odstopanja in načina dodeljevanja letaliških slotov in slotov upravljanja pretoka zračnega prometa;
1. and to provide more guidance and clarification as regards the text; particularly insists on the need to ensure a better coordination of, and matching between, the allocation of slots by Air Traffic Flow Management (AFTM) and airport slots, notably in relation to the effectiveness of the slot coordination committees as regards departures and arrivals, and additionally insists on the need to harmonise the definitions, tolerances and the way airport and AFTM slots are awarded;
24. poziva Svet, da pripravi časovni okvir in roke za izboljšanje sodelovanja med organi civilnega letalstva sosednjih držav članic ter s tem zagotovi pomemben napredek glede oblikovanja funkcionalnih blokov zračnega prostora pred letom 2008;
Calls on the Council to lay down a time-frame and deadlines in order to enhance cooperation between civil aviation authorities of neighbouring Member States so as to guarantee a significant step forward before 2008 as regards the building of functional airspace blocks;
26. poziva Komisijo k sprožitvi pristopa od zgoraj navzdol, da zagotovi bistvene izboljšave, če države članice do leta 2008 ne sprejmejo nobenega pomembnega ukrepa;
Urges the Commission, if no significant progress has been made by Member States on this issue by 2008, to take a top-down approach in order to guarantee substantial improvements;
29. meni, da širjenje zmogljivosti letališč ne bo mogoče brez učinkovitega in natančnega sodelovanja med organi letališča ter regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi območij, kjer se ta letališča nahajajo; pod pogojem, da takšno sodelovanje ni v nasprotju s konkurenčnimi pravili Skupnosti;
Is of the opinion that an increase in airport capacity will not be possible without efficient and thorough collaboration between airport authorities and the relevant regional and local administrations; provided that any such collaboration does not contravene Community competition rules;
31. poziva Komisijo, naj od držav članic zahteva, da okrepijo urbanistične in gradbene predpise ter s tem preprečijo hrup in drugo onesnaževanje, ki ga letališča povzročajo okolici;
Calls on the Commission to urge Member States to strengthen their town-planning and building regulations so that noise and other pollution caused by airports to their surrounding areas can be prevented;
34. meni, da morajo letalske družbe v primeru odkupa letaliških objektov zagotoviti ustrezna jamstva in prevzeti odgovornost, kar zdaj zahtevajo od direktorjev letališč, s čimer bi bile direktorjem prihranjene težave v primeru nepričakovanega umika pred popolnim odkupom;
Believes that airline companies should provide adequate guarantees and assume responsibility when it comes to the redemption of the airport facilities that they require airport managers to provide, so as not to place the latter in difficulty in the event of unexpected withdrawal prior to full redemption;
Storitve zemeljske oskrbe
Ground handling services
da pozitivna ocena temelji na ugotovitvah študije iz leta 2002, ki ni zajela celotne razširjene Unije; medtem ko je bilo ugotovljeno, da je izvajanje direktive posebej pomembno v državah članicah, ki so se EU pridružile po tem datumu;
that the positive assessment is based on the findings of the 2002 study which did not cover the whole of the enlarged Union; whereas it has been noticed that the implementation of the Directive is a matter of particular concern in the Member States that joined the EU after this date;
37. poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno analizira učinek izvajanja direktive, njenih končnih koristi in/ali slabosti za uporabnike, uslužbence in potnike, preden pripravi kakršne koli predloge, ki bi vodili v nadaljnjo liberalizacijo;
Invites the Commission to carry out a new impact analysis on the implementation of the Directive, its final benefits and/or disadvantages for users, employees and passengers, before making any proposal that would lead to further liberalisation;
40. priporoča, da se vsak nov poskus spremembe direktive najprej osredotoči na kakovost storitev zemeljske oskrbe in kakovost zaposlovanja na področju zemeljske oskrbe; poziva zlasti Komisijo, naj:
Recommends that any new attempt to amend the Directive should first concentrate on the quality of ground handling services and on the quality of employment in ground handling; particularly invites the Commission to:
– preveri možnost za vzpostavitev minimalnih standardov kakovosti in socialnih standardov, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri izbirnem postopku in jih vključiti v pogodbe med letalskimi prevozniki in izvajalci storitev,
- examine the possibility of establishing minimum quality and social standards that should be taken into account in the selection procedure and inserted in contracts between the airline and the service provider,
– določi okvir za dodeljevanje storitev podizvajalcem z zagotovitvijo minimalne ravni varstva/ravni kakovosti za izvajalce, da zagotovi pravično konkurenco in zahteva predhodno identifikacijo vseh podpogodbenikov,
- frame the use of subcontracting by ensuring a minimum level of safety/quality levels for providers in order to secure fair competition and require the prior identification of any subcontractors,
– čim bolj opredeli in jasno določi pogoje, pod katerimi lahko letališče zagotavlja storitve zemeljske oskrbe, zlasti kadar je te storitve pripravljeno izvajati zadostno število neodvisnih izvajalcev storitev,
- defineand clearly establish, as far as possible, the conditions under which an airport can provide ground handling services, especially when a sufficient number of independent service suppliers is willing to provide these services,
– meni, da bi morala Komisija revidirati in, kjer je to primerno, povečati število ponudnikov storitev, ki jih lahko sprejmejo letališča (trenutno lahko sprejmejo 2 ponudnika), zlasti v primeru večjih letališč, ter da ne bi smelo biti umetne omejitve za število tretjih oskrbovalcev;
- consider that the minimum number of service providers admitted at airports (currently two) should be reviewed by the Commission and be increased, where appropriate, particularly in the case of large airports, and that there should be no artificial limit on the number of third-party handlers,
– določi postopek za izdajanje dovoljenj na ravni držav članic za zagotovitev, da postane minimalna raven kakovosti in trajnosti ter spoštovanja socialnega prava in kolektivnih pogodb za izvajalca obvezna; poudarja, da lahko podeljevanje dovoljenja ureja načelo vzajemnega priznavanja,
- put in place a licensing procedure at Member State level in order to guarantee that a minimum level of quality and sustainability become mandatory for providers and that social laws and collective agreements are upheld; stresses that the granting of a licence could be governed by the principle of mutual recognition,
– zagotovi, da izvajalci za svoje zaposlene zagotavljajo zadostno raven usposobljenosti in socialne zaščite,
- ensure that providers guarantee an adequate level of training and social protection for their employees,
– zagotovi ustrezno raven varnosti in zaščite za vse uporabnike, potnike in tovor,
- ensure the appropriate level of security and safety for all users, passengers and cargo;
43. ugotavlja, da se je po sprejetju Direktive 96/67/ES konkurenca občutno okrepila, cene storitev zemeljske oskrbe v skoraj vseh „starih“ državah članicah EU pa so se znižale;
Notes that, since the adoption of Directive 96/67/EC, competition has noticeably intensified and that the prices for ground handling services have decreased in almost all ‘old’ EU Member States;
To poročilo obravnava dve temi: zmogljivosti letališč (na podlagi sporočila Komisije: Akcijski načrt za zmogljivost letališč, učinkovitost in varnost v Evropi) in storitve zemeljske oskrbe (na podlagi poročila Komisije o uporabi Direktive Sveta 96/67/ES z dne 15. oktobra 1996 ).
Two topics are tackled in this Report: airport capacities (following Commission's communication: An action plan for airport capacity, efficiency and safety in Europe ) and Ground handling ( following the Commission's report on the application of Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 ).
Zmogljivosti letališč
Airport Capacities
· Dolgoročno povečanje povpraševanja po prometu
· The long-term increase in traffic demand
Na podlagi študije Eurocontrola iz leta 2004 bosta globalizacija in hitra gospodarska rast povečali povpraševanje po letih (promet brez letaliških omejitev) v povprečju za 4,3 % na leto.
Following a 2004 Eurocontrol study, globalisation and rapid economic growth will result in a flight demand growth (traffic without airport constraints) averaging 4.3% p.a.
Do leta 2025 se bo ob takšnem poteku dogodkov povpraševanje po letih v primerjavi z letom 2003 2,5-krat povečalo.
By the year 2025, this scenario would result in a growth of 2.5 times the 2003 flight demand.
Sedanje uresničevanje študije Eurocontrola kaže na to, da bo rast višja, kot se je pričakovalo po najzahtevnejšem scenariju iz leta 2004 (5,2-odstotna letna rast je zdaj najverjetnejša številka).
The current actualisation of the study by Eurocontrol seems to demonstrate that the growth will be higher than expected in the most challenging 2004 scenario (a growth of 5,2 % p.a. in now the most credible figure).
Kljub temu bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti zmogljivost za izvedbo do 2,6 od 3,7 milijona zavrnjenih letov, če se izberejo manj ugodni termini (poleti zunaj prometnih konic) in manj ugodna mesta (poleti s sekundarnih letališč).
However, it would be possible to find capacity for up to 2.6 of the 3.7 million unaccommodated flights by accepting less ideal times (push traffic of the peak hours) and places (push traffic to secondary airports).
Če trg zračnega prevoza zahteva, da vzorci porazdelitve povpraševanja ostanejo takšni, kot so, ter ob upoštevanju, da se obstoječa letališča ne morejo širiti, kot je potrebno, bi bila leta 2025 edina nadomestna možnost za izvedbo številnih zavrnjenih letov gradnja pomožnih letališč v bližini prezasedenih letališč.
If the air transport market requires demand distribution patterns to remain as they are, and considering that existing airports cannot expand as required, the only alternative way to handle the mass of unaccommodated flights in 2025 would be the creation of reliever airports in the vicinity of their congested counterparts.
· Predlogi Komisije za optimizacijo sedanjih zmogljivosti in upravljanja prometa
· The Commission's suggestions on the optimisation of current capacities and traffic management
Za obravnavo tega vprašanja in skrbi glede varnosti, ki jih sproža, sporočilo predlaga akcijski načrt, oblikovan na podlagi sklopa petih ključnih ukrepov:
To address the issue and the safety related concerns it raises, the Communication is proposing an action plan structured around a series of five key actions:
Vse te usmeritve so skladne in uporabne.
All of these orientations are consistent and useful.
Zato je treba podpreti 14 ukrepov za izvajanje strategije, ki jih je v svojem sporočilu predlagala Komisija.
The 14 actions suggested by the Commission in its communication to implement the strategy must hence be upheld.
Kljub temu Komisija ne razišče v celoti dejstva, da bodo potrebne dodatne zmogljivosti, in ne obravnava nekaterih vprašanj, ki lahko na bolj trajnosten način spremljajo precejšnjo rast prometa.
However, the Commission does not fully investigate the fact that extra capacities will be needed and does not consider some issues that could accompany, in a more sustainable manner, the substantial growth in traffic.
· Optimizacija obstoječih zmogljivosti in prometnih razmer ni dovolj za obravnavo večjega povpraševanja
· The optimisation of existing capacities and traffic conditions is not enough to address the rise in demand
Splošno mnenje zainteresiranih strani je, da bo pomanjkanje zmogljivosti in večje povpraševanje zagotovo ustvarilo trg za nova večja letališča (do 10 glede na študijo Eurocontrola) in srednje velika letališča (do 15 glede na Eurocontrol).
The general opinion of stakeholders is that the shortage of capacity and the increase in demand will necessarily open a market for new major airports (up to 10 following Eurocontrol study) and medium sized airports (up to 15 for Eurocontrol).
Akcijski načrt za optimizacijo obstoječih zmogljivosti, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, je nedvomno potreben, vendar ne bo dovolj za obravnavo prihodnjega povečanja prometa.
The action plan on optimisation of current capacities suggested by the Commission is certainly necessary but it will not be enough to address the upcoming rise of traffic.
· Obravnavanje rasti prometa z gradnjo novih letališč je lahko okolju prijazno
· addressing the traffic growth by building new capacity can be environmentally friendly
– Prihranili bi nepotrebne emisije zaradi preobremenjenosti med letom ali preobremenjenosti ploščadi.
- It would save unnecessary emissions due to en route or ramp congestion.