natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Besedilo členov 5a, 5b in 5c je enako kot v nedavno sprejetih pravnih aktih, ki določajo sprejemanje delegiranih aktov (npr. uredba o hišnih živalih ali o označevanju energetske porabe pri izdelkih, povezanih z energijo).
The wording of Articles 5a, 5b and 5c is identical to that of legal acts (ex. pets regulation; energy labelling of the consumption of energy by energy-related products) recently adopted and which provide for delegated acts.
Pooblastilo iz člena 5 lahko kadarkoli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 5 may be revoked at any time ) by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Institucija, ki je začela notranji postopek o morebitnem preklicu prenosa pooblastila, si prizadeva o tem obvestiti drugo institucijo in Komisijo v razumnem roku pred sprejetjem končne odločitve, pri čemer navede preneseno pooblastilo, ki naj bi se preklicalo, ter možne razloge za preklic.
The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of power shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated power which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation.
S sklepom o preklicu pooblastilo, določeno v navedenem sklepu, preneha veljati.
The decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision.
Gl. obrazložitev k poročevalčevemu predlogu spremembe 16.
See justification of Amendment 16 introduced by the Rapporteur.
Na pobudo Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta se to obdobje podaljša za dva meseca.
At the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council that period shall be extended by two months.
Če po izteku ▌obdobja iz odstavka 1 niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu, se ta objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati na tam navedeni datum.
If, on expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1 , neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the date stated therein.
Če Evropski parlament ali Svet ugovarja zoper delegirani akt v roku iz odstavka 1, akt ne začne veljati.
If the European Parliament or the Council objects to the delegated act within the period referred to in paragraph 1 , it shall not enter into force.
Za namene uporabe te uredbe, se smatra, da smejo živila in krma , uvožena iz tretjih držav, v promet samo, če so bila na carinskem ozemlju Skupnosti v carinskem postopku, vendar ne kot blago v tranzitu .
For the purposes of applying this Regulation, foodstuffs or feedingstuffs imported from third countries shall be considered to be placed on the market if, on the customs territory of the Community, they undergo a customs procedure other than a transit procedure .
Ta uredba se uporablja tudi za živila in krmo, uvožene iz tretjih držav, ki so v tranzitu ali namenjeni izvozu .
This Regulation shall also apply to foodstuffs or feedingstuffs imported from third countries , in customs transit or intended for export .
Države članice nadzorujejo skladnost z najvišjimi dovoljenimi stopnjami.
Member States shall monitor compliance with the maximum permitted levels.
V ta namen države članice vzdržujejo sistem uradnih kontrol živil in krme in drugih dejavnosti ustrezno okoliščinam, vključno z javno komunikacijo glede varnosti živil in krme in povezanimi tveganji, v skladu s členom 17 Uredbe 178/2002.
For that purpose Member States shall maintain a system of official controls of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs , and other activities as appropriate in the circumstances, including public communication on food and feed safety and risks, in accordance with Article 17 of Regulation 178/2002 .
Izvedbeni predpisi za to uredbo, in prilagoditve seznama manj pomembnih živil v prilogi II skupaj z najvišjimi dovoljenimmi stopnjami za krmo iz priloge III , se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom, iz člena 195(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 , ki se uporablja po analogiji.
Rules for implementing this Regulation and adaptations to the list of minor foodstuffs , together with the maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination to be applied thereto, as set out in Annex II, and to the maximum permitted levels for feedingstuffs set out in Annex III shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 195(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 , which shall apply by analogy.
Zato Komisiji v ta namen pomaga ad hoc Odbor.
To this end the Commission shall be assisted by an ad hoc Committee.
Člen 8 je bil združen s členom 5, saj se oba nanašata na spremembo najvišjih dovoljenih vrednosti (prilogi I in III) oziroma prilagoditev seznama iz Priloge II, kar se lahko opravi skupaj s prenosom pooblastil na Komisijo (delegirani akti).
Article 8 was merged with Article 5, since both refer to revision of maximum levels (Annexes I and III) and/or adaptation of the list of Annex II, which can be treated jointly through a delegation of powers (delegated acts) to the Commission.
Komisija do marca 2012 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o ustreznosti najvišjih dovoljenih ravni, določenih v prilogah I in III, in o ustreznosti vzdrževanja seznama manj pomembnih živil, kot določeno v prilogi II.
The Commission shall submit, by March 2012, a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the appropriateness of the maximum permitted levels laid down in A nnexes I and III, and on the appropriateness of maintaining a list of minor foodstuff s as laid down in Annex II.
To poročilo naj bi zlasti preverilo skladnost z najvišjimi dovoljenimi ravnmi z dejansko omejitvijo koncentracij na 1 mSv/y za javnost v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v direktivi 96/29 Euratom, in preučilo možno vključitev dodatnih relevantnih radionuklidov v priloge I in III.
Th at report shall in particular examine the compliance of the maximum permitted levels with the effective dose limit of 1 mSv/y for members of the public under the conditions laid down in Directive 96/29 Euratom and consider the possible inclusion of additional relevant radionucleides in Annex I and III.
Pri ocenjevanju ravni se mora poročilo osredotočiti na zaščito najbolj ranljivih skupin prebivalstva, zlasti otrok, in preveriti, ali je primerno na tej podlagi določiti najvišje dovoljene vrednosti za vse kategorije prebivalstva.
In assessing the levels, the report shall focus on the protection of the most vulnerable population groups, in particular children, and examine whether it would be appropriate to set maximum permitted levels for all categories of population on that basis.
Priloga I – opomba 19
Annex I – footnote 19
Otroška hrana pomeni hrano, namenjeno posebej za prehrano dojenčkov , ki v celoti pokriva njihove prehranjevalne potrebe v prvih štirih do šestih mesecih življenja, in je za prodajo na drobno zapakirana v embalaži, ki je jasno označena z napisom «hrana za dojenčke“.
19 Infant food is defined as those foodstuffs intended for the feeding of infants during the first four to six months of life , which meet , in themselves, the nutritional requirements of this category of person and are put up for retail sale in packages which are clearly identified and labelled "food preparation for infants";
19 Otroška hrana pomeni začetne formule za dojenčke, vključno z mlečnim nadomestkom, nadaljevalne formule za dojenčke in majhne otroke ter enakovredna živila, namenjena dojenčkom, mlajšim od dvanajstih mesecev, ki v celoti pokriva njihove prehranjevalne potrebe in je za prodajo na drobno zapakirana v embalaži, ki je jasno označena z napisom „hrana za dojenčke“.
19 Infant food is defined as infant formulae, including formula milk, follow-on formulae and equivalent foodstuffs , intended for infants under the age of twelve months , which meet in themselves, the nutritional requirements of this category of person and are put up for retail sale in packages which are clearly identified and labelled "food preparation for infants";
Narava predloga:
Nature of the proposal:
Odbor ITRE je bil po Pogodbi Euratom in v skladu s poslovnikom Parlamenta povprašan za mnenje o zgoraj navedenem predlogu uredbe Sveta.
The ITRE Committee is consulted under the Euratom Treaty on the proposal for a Council Regulation referred to above, pursuant to Rule 87 of the Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Predlog zajema predvsem kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb iz treh uredb, sprejetih med letoma 1987 in 1990, ki določajo stopnjo radioaktivne onesnaženosti v primeru radiološke nevarnosti.
The proposal mainly consists of a codification of unchanged provisions from three regulations adopted between 1987 and 1990 laying down levels of radioactive contamination in case of radiological emergency.
V skladu s členom 87 poslovnika so predlogi za prenovitev sprejemljivi samo, če zadevajo dele predloga, ki vsebujejo spremembe, in po predhodni potrditvi odbora za pravne zadeve (JURI), da predlog ne vsebuje drugih bistvenih sprememb razen tistih, ki so v predlogu označene kot take.
In accordance with Rule 87, amendments to the recasting proposal are admissible only if they concern those parts of the proposal which contain changes, after preliminary verification by the committee responsible for legal affairs (JURI) that the proposal entails no substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal.
Tehnično preverjanje glede ustreznosti zakonodajne tehnike prenovitve je odbor JURI potrdil v pismu z dne 29. junija in dovolil poročevalcu odbora ITRE, da nadaljuje pregled vsebine predloga.
The technical checking of the adequacy of the legislative technique of recasting was confirmed by the JURI Committee by letter of 29 June, allowing the Rapporteur of the ITRE Committee to proceed with the examination of the substance of the proposal.
Ocena poročevalca:
Assessment by the Rapporteur:
(i) Vsebina predloga:
(i) Content of the proposal:
V uvodnih izjavah predloga za prenovitev so uvedene naknadne utemeljitve določb, ki ostajajo nespremenjene (kakršne so v uredbi iz leta 1987 in njenih spremenjenih različicah).
Through a recital, the recast proposal provides an ex-post justification to provisions which remain unchanged (as incorporated in the 1987 regulation and its amended versions).
Vsebina uredbe zajema dvoravenski mehanizem intervencij v primeru radiološke nevarnosti ali jedrske nesreče:
The content of the regulation consists in a mechanism of two levels of intervention in case of radiological emergency or nuclear accident:
- Komisija nemudoma sprejme „ad hoc“ uredbo, s katero za posamezni primer, točno določeno območje in točno določen čas, določi najvišjo dovoljeno stopnjo radioaktivnega onesnaženja, kakor je opisano v prilogah I in III predloga;
- an immediate adoption by the Commission of an 'ad hoc' regulation to apply to a specific case, in a defined area and for a limited period of validity, the maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination as provided for in the Annex I and III of the proposal;
- v mesecu dni po sprejetju vložita Komisija in Svet predlog za prilagoditev te „ad hoc“ uredbe.
- within one month of its adoption, a proposal from the Commission to the Council to adapt or confirm this 'ad hoc' regulation.
Namen tehnike prenovitve je ravno to, da se utemelji pravica Sveta, da si pridrži pristojnost sprejemanja uredbe, zato da lahko pravočasno odobri ukrepe, ki jih predlaga Komisija.
The aim of the recast technique is precisely to justify the right for the Council "to exercise directly the power to adopt a Regulation to timely endorse measures proposed by the Commission".
Zato je v novi uvodni izjavi določeno, da je primerno , da si Svet pridrži to pristojnost.
It does so by laying down in the new Recital 15 that "it is appropriate for the Council to reserve" such a right.
Zaradi predloga za prenovitev bi želel poročevalec zastaviti vprašanji:
The recast proposal might lead the Rapporteur to address the following questions:
- ali ta obrazložitev zadosti utemeljuje, da si Svet pridrži izvedbeno pristojnost, saj gre v vsakem primeru za odstopanje od običajnega pravila, da je izvedbena pristojnost rokah Komisije;
- whether this justification provides for sufficient motivation of the reservation of implementing powers by the Council, which in any case is a derogation to the normal rule reserving implementing power to the Commission;
Poročevalec meni, da uvodne izjave 15 – ki edina vsebuje spremembe – ne moremo ločevati od člena, na katerega se nanaša.
The Rapporteur is of the opinion that Recital 15 - which is the only part containing changes - cannot be dissociated from the article to which it refers to.
Ob tem meni, da je treba preučiti veljavnost člena 3 in posledično tudi mehanizma, ki izhaja iz pristojnosti, danih Svetu v kasnejših členih predloga.
In doing so, the Rapporteur would have to consider the validity of article 3 and subsequently, the mechanism stemming from those powers given to the Council in the following articles of the proposal.
Zato je treba ne glede na tehniko prenovitve preučiti doslednost vse uredbe.
Therefore, beyond the sole recasting technique, there is a need to consider the whole consistency of the regulation.
Po poročevalčevem mnenju je mehanizem – ki zajema sprejetje „ad hoc“ uredbe v primeru radiološke nevarnosti, da se uporabi najvišja dovoljena stopnja onesnaženja, kakor je določeno v sedanji uredbi, po možnosti jo sprejme Svet – tega vidika zelo vprašljiv.
To that extent, the mechanism - which consists in the immediate adoption of an 'ad hoc' regulation in case of radiological emergency to apply the maximum permitted levels of contamination as provided for in the current regulation, possibly directly through the Council - seems to be highly questionable for the Rapporteur.
Poročevalec želi izraziti tudi nekaj zadržkov:
The Rapporteur would like to express the following reservations:
Ø ureditev, ki je bila določena v počernobilskih razmerah, bi bilo treba uskladiti s sedanjim sistemom izvedbenih pristojnosti
Ø those arrangements, which were defined in the post Chernobyl context, would need to be aligned with the current regime of implementing powers
- „Ad hoc“ uredba, ki bi jo v skladu s členom 2 predloga sprejela Komisija, je preohlapno opredeljena.
- The 'ad hoc' Regulation adopted by the Commission according to Article 2 of the proposal is too vaguely defined.
V sedanji obliki daje Komisiji pravico, da takoj sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, kar zajema izvedbene ukrepe v osnovnem pomenu člena 291 PDEU.
As it stands, it tends to confer on the Commission the right to take immediately appropriate measures, consisting in 'implementing' measures of this basic act in the sense of Article 291 TFEU.
Poročevalec Komisiji ne odreka sprejemanja ukrepov, če bi bilo potrebno, meni pa, da bi morali biti ureditev in načini revizije dobro usklajeni s členom 291.
Without denying the necessity for the Commission to adopt those measures, the Rapporteur considers that their regime should be clearly settled in line with Article 291, as well as their modalities of revision.
- Ureditev iz člena 3, po kateri lahko Svet sprejme uredbo, s katero prilagodi ali potrdi določbe „ad hoc“ uredbe, je nejasna.
- The regime set out in Article 3, whereby the Council can adopt a regulation so as 'to adapt or confirm the provisions' of the 'ad hoc' regulation is unclear.
Tudi tu se zdi, da bi lahko ti ukrepi Sveta šteli za izvedbene akte k sedanji uredbi.
Here again it seems that those Council measures can qualify as implementing acts of the current regulation.
Se pa ta pristojnost lahko na Svet prenese le v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih, običajno namreč to pristojnost izvaja Komisija
However, it is only in 'duly justified specific cases' that such a power can be conferred on the Council, the Commission being normally responsible for exercising that power
Člen 291(2) PDEU se glasi: „Če so potrebni enotni pogoji za izvajanje pravno zavezujočih aktov Unije, se s temi akti na Komisijo, ali v ustrezno utemeljenih posebnih primerih in v primerih iz členov 24 in 26 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, na Svet, prenesejo izvedbena pooblastila.“ .
Article 291(2) TFEUreads as follows: 'Where uniform conditions for implementing legally binding Union acts are needed, those acts shall confer implementing powers on the Commission, or, in duly justified specific cases and in the cases provided for in Articles 24 and 26 of the Treaty on European Union, on the Council '. .
Poročevalec meni, da glede na kontekst, vrsto in vsebino osnovnega akta, ki naj bi se izvajal, sedanji predlog ne utemeljuje dovolj jasno potrebe, zakaj bi moral Svet pridržati izvedbene pristojnosti.
It is the opinion of the Rapporteur that the current proposal does not clearly motivate the need to reserve implementing powers to the Council as regards the context, the nature and the content of the basic act to be implemented.
Ø najvišje dovoljene stopnje v predlogu (prilogi I in III) same po sebi povzročajo pravno negotovost
Ø the maximum permitted levels set out in the proposal (Annex I and III) are themselves subject to legal uncertainty
- Po členu 5(1) se lahko najvišje dovoljene stopnje na zahtevo države članice ali Komisije spremenijo ali dopolnijo s predložitvijo predloga Komisije Svetu.
- According to Article 5(1), those levels can be 'revised or supplemented' through a proposal from the Commission to the Council, 'at the request of a Member state or the Commission'.
To pomeni dodajanje ali spreminjanje nebistvenih prvin zakonodajnega akta, kar bi moralo biti usklajeno z ureditvijo delegiranih aktov po členu 290 PDEU.
This amounts to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of the legislative act, which should be aligned with the regime of the 'delegated acts' in accordance with Article 290 TFEU.
Zato bi morala pravico do pobude imeti samo Komisija.
Therefore the right of initiative should rest with the Commission only.
Pobude držav članic bi bile očitna kršitev Pogodbe.
Any initiative from a Member State would be a clear violation of the Treaty rules.
- Z oblikovanjem prečiščene različice obstoječih uredb, sprejetih v devetdesetih letih, se predlog še vedno sklicuje na nerelevantna besedila: gl. opredelitev otroške hrane v Prilogi I.
- By codifying existing regulations adopted in the 1990's, the proposal continues to make reference to obsolete texts: see the definition of "infant food" in Annex I.
Čeprav gre pri tem predlogu za tehniko prenovitve, poročevalec poziva odbor ITRE, naj znatno spremeni predlog, ne samo označene sive dele, da bo zagotovil pravno varnost in doslednost besedila.
Although this proposal is dealt with through the recasting technique, the Rapporteur invites the ITRE Committee to substantially amend the proposal beyond the sole grey part identified, so as to ensure the legal certainty and coherence of the text.
Zato bi predlagal natančnejše spremembe prečiščenih delov predloga, da bi:
The Rapporteur would therefore propose detailed amendments to the codified parts of the proposal with the aim:
(i) nemudoma uporabila najvišjo dovoljeno stopnjo radioaktivne onesnaženosti, kakor je opredeljena v priloga (gl. spremenjeni člen 2);
(i) immediately apply the maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination as defined in the Annexes (see Article 2 amended);
(ii) sprejela delegirane akte, s katerimi bi spremenila in dopolnila stopnje onesnaženosti in seznam manj pomembnih živil in krme, da bi upoštevala najnovejši tehnični napredek (gl. spremenjeni člen 5 in s tem povezani postopek po členih od 5a do 5c).
(ii) adopt 'delegated acts' to revise and supplement the levels of contamination and the list of minor foodstuffs and feedingstuffs, to take due account of the latest technical progress (see Article 5 amended and the following procedure of Articles 5a to 5c).
- delovali v interesu državljanov ter boljše upravljali razmere po nesreči, s čimer bi omejili intervencije in manevrski prostor držav članic:
- to serve the interest of the citizens through a better management of the post-accident situation by limiting the intervention and margins of manoeuvre given to Member States:
(i) ker je po eni strani postopek za potrditev in spremembo uporabe najvišje dovoljene stopnje s strani Sveta nepotreben in vir pravne negotovosti, poročevalec predlaga, naj se ta raven ukrepanja izbriše (člena 3 in 4);
(i) on one hand, since the procedure of 'confirmation' or 'adaptation' of the application of the maximum permitted levels by the Council seems unnecessary and a source of legal uncertainty, the Rapporteur suggests deleting this level of intervention (Article 3 and Article 4);
(ii) po drugi strani so pobude držav članic glede spremembe ali dodajanja stopenj onesnaženosti (člena 5 in 8), pa tudi pravila za izvajanje uredbe (člen 8), ustrezno poenostavljene z ureditvijo za delegirane/izvedbene akte (spremenjena člena 2 in 5).
(ii) on the other hand, the initiatives of Member States as regards the revision or addition to the levels of contamination (Article 5 and 8), as well as rules for implementing the regulation (Article 8), are respectively streamlined through delegated/implementing acts regime (Article 2 amended and 5 amended).
- zagotovili pravno varnost celega predloga:
- to ensure legal certainty of the whole proposal through:
(i) uskladitev glede opuščenih postopkov komitologije na področju Euratom, ki so sprejeti po analogiji – kar naj bi pričujoči predlog kodificiral in uskladil z določbami Lizbonske pogodbe;
(i) the alignment of obsolete procedures - 'comitology' procedures in the field of Euratom adopted by analogy - that this proposal intends to codify, with the Lisbon Treaty provisions;
(ii) po potrebi s posodobitvijo opredelitev pojmov.
(ii) where necessary, the updating of definitions.
V postopkovnem smislu bi te znatne spremembe pomenile, da bi moral poročevalec svojo namero pred glasovanjem o osnutku poročila sporočiti Svetu in Komisiji, kakor je določeno v členu 87 poslovnika.
In procedural terms, those proposed substantive changes would entail notification of the Rapporteur's intention to the Council and the Commission prior to the vote of the draft report, as provided for in Rule 87.
PRILOGA : PISMO ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE
ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS
predsednik Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energijo
Chair of Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Odbor za pravne zadeve, ki mu predsedujem, je preučil zgoraj omenjeni predlog v skladu s členom 37 o prenovitvi, kakor je opredeljen v poslovniku Parlamenta.
The Committee on Legal Affairs, which I am honoured to chair, has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to Rule 87 on Recasting, as introduced into the Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Po mnenju pravne službe, katere predstavniki so sodelovali na sejah posvetovalne delovne skupine, ki je preučila predlog za prenovitev, ter v skladu s priporočili pripravljavca mnenja odbor za pravne zadeve meni, da zadevni predlog ne prinaša večjih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so že v predlogu ali v mnenju posvetovalne delovne skupine označene kot take, in da glede kodifikacije nespremenjenih določb predhodnih aktov s temi spremembami predlog preprosto kodificira obstoječa besedila in ne spreminja njihove vsebine.
Following the opinion of the Legal Service, whose representatives participated in the meetings of the Consultative Working Party examining the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the draftsperson, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that the proposal in question does not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal or in the opinion of the Consultative Working Party and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those changes, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Odbor za pravne zadeve po razpravi na svoji seji 23. junija 2010 z 19 glasovi za in nobenim vzdržanim
In conclusion, after discussing it at its meeting of 23 June 2010, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 19 votes in favour and no abstentions