natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
NI sprememb
no change
Kategorija 7: Zamrzovalna plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalkami
Category 7: Freezer tuna seiners
36 dovoljenj
36 licences
22 dovoljenj
22 licences
Kategorija 8: Plovila za ribolov tunov z ribiškimi palicami in plovila s površinskimi parangali
Category 8: Pole-and-line tuna vessels and surface longliners
31 dovoljenj
31 licences
Kategorija 9: Zamrzovalna plovila z vlečno mrežo za pelagični ribolov
Category 9: Pelagic freezer trawlers
22 dovoljenj za referenčno tonažo 440 000 ton
22 licences for a reference tonnage of 440 000 tonnes
17 dovoljenj za referenčno tonažo 250 000 ton
17 licences for a reference tonnage of 250 000 tonnes
zmanjšanje dovoljenj za 23 %,
23% decrease in licences,
zmanjšanje referenčne tonaže za 43 %
43% decrease in reference tonnage
Kategorija 10: Ribolov rakovic
Category 10: Crab fishing
Kategorija 11: Plovila za pelagični ribolov, namenjen za prodajo svežih rib
Category 11: Non-freezer pelagic vessels
15 000 BT na mesec, povprečno na leto
15 000 GT per month, averaged over the year
Finančni prispevek je določen tako:
The financial contribution is set as follows:
Leto 1
Y 1
Leto 2
Y 2
Leto 3
Y 3
Leto 4
Y 4
Finančni prispevek EU:
EU financial contribution
(v milijonih EUR)
(EUR millions)
od tega za izvajanje nacionalne ribiške politike
of which, for the implementation of the national fisheries policy
Zneski iz tabele se lahko primerjajo s 86 milijoni EUR letno iz sedanjega protokola, od katerih je bilo 11 milijonov EUR namenjenih izvajanju mavretanske nacionalne ribiške politike.
These figures compare to €86 million per year under the current protocol, of which €11 million was intended for the implementation of the Mauritanian national fisheries policy.
Pristojbine lastnikov plovil iz EU so ocenjene na približno 15 milijonov EUR letno, če bi se možnosti uporabile v celoti.
Finally, EU shipowners' fees are estimated around €15 million per year if the possibilities were fully utilized.
Glede na občutljivo stanje nekaterih izkoriščanih staležev (zlasti glavonožcev in majhnih pelagičnih vrst rib), čeprav to ni nujno vzrok za manjši ulov, je hvalevredno, da se je izkoriščanje številnih staležev zmanjšalo, kljub temu pa poročevalka obsoja grobost, s katero je Skupnost Mavretanijo prisilila za pogajalsko mizo.
Given the fragile status of some of the stocks being exploited (notably cephalopods and the small pelagic fish species) and although this does not lead systematically to a decrease in the level of catches, it is commendable that the levels of exploitation for several stocks is to be decreased, even if your rapporteur decries the brutal manner in which the Community forced Mauritania to the negotiating table.
V protokolu je v opombi navedeno, da bi bila proračunska podpora v višini 40 milijonov EUR na voljo za obdobje treh let od leta 2009 dalje, če bodo izpolnjeni potrebni pogoji.
There is a footnote in the protocol stating that budgetary support of €40 million could be made available for the three years from 2009 if the requisite conditions are met.
Pogoji niso navedeni, jasno pa ni niti, ali gre za dodaten ali že načrtovan denar.
Those conditions are not spelled out, nor is it clear whether this is additional money or already programmed.
Če gre za nova sredstva, potem to gotovo pomeni korak k ločevanju zneskov, plačanih državi, od količin dovoljenega ulova.
If it is new money, then it is a positive step in the direction of decoupling the amount of money paid to a country and the amount of fishing allowed.
S takšno politiko se neposredno in resno izvaja pritisk na tretjo državo, da bi ta dovolila čezmerno izkoriščanje svojih morskih virov.
Such a policy puts direct and serious pressure on the third country to allow over-exploitation of its marine resources.
Člen 2 - odstavek 4 a (novo)
Article 2 - paragraph 4 a (new)
Komisija vsako leto objavi seznam plovil, ki delujejo v vsaki od ribolovnih kategorij, vključenih v ta protokol.
The Commission shall publish annually the list of vessels operating in each fishing category included in this Protocol.
Da bi bila poraba sredstev Skupnosti preglednejša, je treba objaviti tudi seznam plovil, ki delujejo na podlagi tega sporazuma.
To increase transparency of the expenditure of Community funds, the list of vessels operating under this agreement shall also be made public.
V skladu s členom 30(3) finančne uredbe 1 in v duhu resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. februarja 2008 o preglednosti pri finančnih zadevah, Komisija na svoji spletni strani letno objavi seznam posameznih končnih upravičencev do finančnega prispevka EU.
In accordance with Article 30(3) of the Financial Regulation 1 , and in the spirit of the European Parliament's resolution of 19 February 2008 on transparency in financial matters, the Commission shall publish annually on its website the list of individual end-beneficiaries of the EU financial contribution.
1 Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
1 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.
V predlog spremembe so vključene natančnejše zahteve za podrobno poročanje o končnih upravičencih do finančnega nadomestila EU.
This amendment includes more specific requirements for detailed reporting on end-beneficiaries of the financial compensation paid by the EU.
Komisija pred iztekom veljavnosti protokola in pred začetkom pogajanj za njegovo morebitno podaljšanje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži naknadno oceno protokola skupaj z analizo stroškov in koristi.
Prior to expiry of the Protocol and before the beginning of negotiations for a possible renewal, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an ex-post evaluation of the Protocol, including a cost-benefit analysis.
Pred začetkom novih pogajanj je potrebno ocena sedanjega protokola, zato da se ugotovi, ali je treba v morebitno podaljšanje protokola vključiti spremembe in kakšne naj bi te bile.
An evaluation of the current Protocol is necessary before negotiations begin in order to know what changes, if any, should be included in any possible renewal.
Carmen Fraga Estevez.
Carmen Fraga Estévez
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) 999/2001 v zvezi s Komisiji podeljenimi izvedbenimi pooblastili
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0053 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0053 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 154(4)(b) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0054/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 154(4)(b) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0054/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0279/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0279/2008 ),
(1a) Odstavek 3 člena 9 se nadomesti z:
(1a) Article 9, paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following :
Glede na merila iz točke 5 priloge V odstavka 1 in 2 ne veljata za prežvekovalce, pri katerih so bili rezultati testa, ki ga je priznala Komisija , negativni .
Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply, in the light of the criteria set out in point 5 of Annex V, to ruminants which have undergone an alternative test which has been recognised by the Commission, where the results of the test were negative.
Navedeni ukrepi za spremembo nebistvenih določb te uredbe se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 24(3).“
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation , shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 24(3)."
Te ukrepe je treba uskladiti z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom, na primer s hitrimi testi iz člena 5(3) in nadomestnimi testi iz člena 8(2).
This measure should be aligned to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, like the rapid tests under Article 5(3) and the alternative tests under Article 8(2).
Člen 13 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 3
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
(1b) V členu 13(1) se tretji pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
(1b) In Article 13, paragraph 1, the third subparagraph shall be replaced by the following :
"Z odstopanjem od tega odstavka lahko države članice uporabijo druge ukrepe, ki omogočajo enako raven zaščite, če so bili odobreni v skladu s postopkom iz člena 24(2) na podlagi meril, sprejetih v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 24(3)."
"By way of derogation from this paragraph, Member States may apply other measures offering an equivalent level of protection, if those measures have been approved in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(2) , on the basis of criteria adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 24(3 )."
Ocena, ali je raven zaščite enaka, mora temeljiti na merilih, sprejetih v okviru regulativnega postopka s pregledom.
The assessment whether the level of protection is equivalent should be based on criteria adopted under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Člen 1 – točka 5 – točka a
Article 1 – point 5 – point a
Člen 23a – točka a
Article 23a – point a
(a) odobritev hitrih testov iz tretjega pododstavka člena 5(3), člena 6(1) in člena 8(2),
(a) approval of the rapid tests referred to in Article 5(3) third subparagraph, Article 6(1) and Article 8(2),
(a) odobritev hitrih testov iz tretjega pododstavka člena 5(3), člena 6(1) , člena 8(2) in člena 9(3) ,
(a) approval of the rapid tests referred to in Article 5(3) third subparagraph, Article 6(1) , Article 8(2) and Article 9(3) ,
Tudi člen 9(3) se sklicuje na te teste.
Also Article 9.3 refers to these tests.
Transmisivna spongiformna encefalopatija je resna grožnja za naše zdravje; ta smrtonosna nalezljiva bolezen se prenaša s posebnim proteinom, ki se nahaja v okuženem mesu.
Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) is a serious threat to our health; this deadly infectious disease spreads by a specific protein, which can be found in infected meat.
Povzroča okvare človeških možganov.
It results deterioration of the human brain.
Epidemijo smo s pomočjo stroge evropske zakonodaje zmanjšali.
We decreased this epidemic, thanks to strict European legislation.
V tem poročilu poročevalec dopolnjuje pomembno delo prejšnjega poročevalca z novimi elementi, ki jih je treba urediti s postopkom s pregledom.
In this report, your Rapporteur supplements the great work of the previous Rapporteur adding new elements to be regulated with regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Predlog Komisije gre v pravo smer, vendar ga je treba spremeniti.
The Commission's proposal leads to the right direction, but it should be amended.
Biti moramo izjemno previdni, da zagotovimo, da regulativni postopek s pregledom ne bo upočasnil ukrepov proti transmisivni spongiformni encefalopatiji.
We have to be extremely cautious to ensure that the regulatory procedure with scrutiny does not slow down the measures against TSE.
Izogniti se moramo tudi nastanku vrzeli v zakonodaji pri dodeljevanju izjem državam članicam.
We also have to avoid the creation of loopholes in legislation when giving exceptions to Member States.
Vloga Evropskega parlamenta je v tem procesu zelo pomembna, ker so njegovo delo in dokumenti pregledni.
The role of the European Parliament is very important in this process as its work and documents are transparent.
Po dobro znanih škandalih v zvezi s primeri transmisivne spongiformne encefalopatije evropska javnost to preglednost upravičeno potrebuje in si jo zasluži.
After the well known scandals concerning TSE cases, the European public rightly needs and deserves this transparency.
Sprememba Uredbe (ES) 999/2001/ES v zvezi s Komisiji podeljenimi izvedbenimi pooblastili
Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o barvilih, ki se lahko dodajajo zdravilom (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the colouring matters which may be added to medicinal products (recast)
MNENJE ODBORA ZA OKOLJE, JAVNO ZDRAVJE IN VARNOST HRANE .....................7
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 7
PRILOGA: MNENJE POSVETOVALNE DELOVNE SKUPINE PRAVNIH SLUŽB V OBLIKI PISMA 9
ANNEX: OPINION IN LETTER FORM OF THE LEGAL SERVICES' CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY 9
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o barvilih, ki se lahko dodajajo zdravilom
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the colouring matters which may be added to medicinal products (recast)
(Postopek soodločanja – prenovitev )
(Codecision procedure - recast)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0001 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0001 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0026/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0026/2008 ),
UL L 77, 28.3.2002, str.
OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0280/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0280/2008 ),
UL L 203, 17.7.1999, str.
OJ C 203, 17.7.1999, p.
Konferenca predsednikov je v sklepu z dne 12. decembra 2007 imenovala Odbor za pravne zadeve za matični odbor za prilagoditve s komitologijo, medtem ko so bili področni odbori imenovani za odbore za mnenja.
In its decision of 12 December 2007 the Conference of Presidents designated the Committee on Legal Affaires as the lead Committee to deal with this 'comitology alignment' and the specialised committees as opinion-giving committees.
Glede na to, da je predlagana prilagoditev regulativnemu postopku s pregledom popolna, Odbor za pravne zadeve ne predlaga nobenih sprememb, razen tehničnih prilagoditev, ki jih je predlagala posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb.
In view of the fact that the proposed alignment to RPS is complete, the Committee on Legal Affairs does not propose any amendments, apart from the technical adaptations suggested by the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o barvilih, ki se lahko dodajajo zdravilom (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the colouring matters which may be added to medicinal products (Recast)
Barvila, ki se lahko dodajajo zdravilom (prenovitev)
Colouring matters for medicinal products (recast version)
Bruselj, 28. februar 2008
Brussels, 28 February 2008
ZA EVROPSKI PARLAMENT
FOR THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o barvilih, ki se lahko dodajajo zdravilom
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the colouring matters which may be added to medicinal products
KOM(2008)0001 z dne 11. januarja 2008 – 2008/0001(COD)
COM(2008)0001 of 11 January 2008 – 2008/0001(COD)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, zlasti z odstavkom 9, se je posvetovalna delovna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sestala 22. januarja in 6. februarja 2008, da bi med drugim proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predložila Komisija.
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the consultative working party consisting of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission met on 22 January and 6 February 2008 in order to consider, among others, the above Commission proposal.
Posvetovalna skupina je po proučitvi predloga soglasno sklenila, da predlog ne vsebuje vsebinskih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so kot takšne opredeljene v samem predlogu ali v tem mnenju.
Having considered the working document, the working party was thus able to establish, without dissent, that the proposal does not involve any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the text itself or in this opinion.
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o uvedbi ločene obveznosti Črne gore in sorazmernem zmanjšanju obveznosti Srbije v zvezi z dolgoročnimi posojili, ki jih je Skupnost odobrila Državni skupnosti Srbije in Črne gore (nekdanji Zvezni republiki Jugoslaviji) v skladu s sklepoma Sveta 2001/549/ES in 2002/882/ES
on the proposal for a Council decision establishing a separate liability of Montenegro and reducing proportionately the liability of Serbia with regard to the long-term loans granted by the Community to the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (formerly the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) pursuant to Council Decisions 2001/549/EC and 2002/882/EC
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2008)0228 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2008)0228 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6‑0221/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0221/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6‑0281/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0281/2008 ),
Odgovornost Črne gore v zvezi z dolgoročnimi posojili, dodeljenimi Srbiji in Črni gori (nekdanja Federativna republika Jugoslavija)
Separate liability of Montenegro with regard to the long-term loans to Serbia and Montenegro (formerly the Republic of Yugoslavia)
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2150/2002 o statistiki odpadkov, kar zadeva Komisiji podeljena izvedbena pooblastila
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002 on waste statistics, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0777 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0777 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 285(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0456/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0456/2007 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6‑0282/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0282/2008 ),
3. poziva Komisijo, naj čim hitreje objavi poročilo iz člena 8(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 2150/2002;
Calls on the Commission to publish the report referred to in Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002 as soon as possible;
Člen 1 – točka 2 a (novo)
Article 1 ‑ point 2 a (new)
Člen 4 – odstavek 3
Article 4 ‑ paragraph 3
(2a) Člen 4(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(2a) Article 4(3) shall be replaced by the following:
Komisija pripravi program pilotnih študij o odpadkih iz gospodarskih dejavnosti, navedenih v odstavku 1(b), ki jih izvedejo države članice.
The Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies on waste from the economic activities referred to in paragraph 1(b) to be carried out by the Member States.
Cilj pilotnih študij je razvoj metodologije za pridobitev zanesljivih podatkov po načelih statistike Skupnosti, določenih v členu 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 322/97.
The pilot studies shall aim to develop a methodology to obtain regular data which shall be governed by the principles of Community statistics, as laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 322/97.
Komisija krije do 100 % stroškov izvedbe pilotnih študij.
The Commission shall finance up to 100% of the costs for conducting the pilot studies.
Na osnovi zaključkov pilotnih študij sprejme Komisija potrebne izvedbene ukrepe.
On the basis of the conclusions of the pilot studies, the Commission shall adopt the necessary implementing measures.
Ti ukrepi, ki so namenjeni spremembi nebistvenih elementov te uredbe in jo dopolnjujejo, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 7(3).“
These measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(3). "
Uredba (ES) št. 2150/2002 o statistiki odpadkov je začela veljati 29. decembra 2002.
Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002 on waste statistics entered into force 29 December 2002.
Da bi se novi postopek komitologije (regulativni postopek s pregledom) lahko uporabljal tudi pri že veljavnih aktih, sprejetih v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe, je treba navedene akte v skladu s skupno izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije o Sklepu 2006/512/ES prilagoditi v skladu z veljavnimi postopki.
In accordance with the joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Decision 2006/512/EC, for the new comitology procedure (regulatory procedure with scrutiny) to be applicable to instruments adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty which are already in force, those instruments must be adjusted in accordance with the applicable procedures.
Namen sedanjega predloga Komisije je torej prilagoditev določb uredbe o statistiki odpadkov novemu postopku komitologije, kjer je to potrebno.
The purpose of the current Commission proposal is therefore to adapt the provisions in the Waste Statistics Regulation to the new comitology procedure where relevant.
V skladu s sedanjim postopkom se Komisiji da pooblastilo, da opredeli merila za oceno kakovosti in vsebine poročil o kakovosti, izvaja rezultate pilotnih študij in prilagaja vsebino prilog.
According to the current proposal power should be conferred on the Commission to define the proper quality evaluation criteria and the contents of the quality reports, implement the results of the pilot studies and adapt the contents of the annexes.
Ker so ti ukrepi splošnega obsega in so namenjeni spremembi nebistvenih elementov Uredbe (ES) št. 2150/2002 ali njeni dopolnitvi z novimi nebistvenimi elementi, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Since these measures are of general scope and seek to amend non-essential elements of Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002, including by supplementing it by the addition of new non-essential elements, they should be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Predlog poročevalca
Rapporteur's suggestion
V nekaj primerih se je ohranil star regulativni postopek in v dveh primerih poročevalec predlaga spremembo predloga, da bi tudi sprejemanje izvajalnih ukrepov na podlagi sklepov pilotnih študij in ukrepov za pripravo podatkov v skladu s členom 3(2), (3) (ukrepi iz člena 4(3)) spadalo v okvir novega postopka komitologije.
In few cases the old regulatory procedure has been kept and in two cases the Rapporteur proposes to amend the proposal in order to bring also the adoption of implementing measures on basis of the conclusions of pilot studies and measures for the production of results in accordance with Article 3(2), (3) (measures referred to in Article 4(3)) under the new comitology procedure.
Pripombe glede številnih zamud
Comments with regard to various delays