natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
14. opozarja, da ima Komisija kot varuhinja Pogodb glavno vlogo pri zagotavljanju tega, da države članice pravilno in pravočasno izvajajo zakonodajo Evropske unije; spodbuja Komisijo, naj uporabi vse pristojnosti, ki so ji dodeljene s Pogodbami, zlasti nove določbe člena 260 PDEU v zvezi z neizpolnjevanjem obveznosti o obvestilu glede ukrepov o prenosu direktiv;
Recalls that the Commission has a primary role as the guardian of the Treaties in ensuring the correct and timely application of European Union law by the Member States; encourages the Commission to use all the competences granted to her by the Treaties, especially the new provisions of Article 260 TFEU concerning Member States’ failure of notification of transposition measures of directives;
Sprejeta besedila na ta dan, P7_TA(2010)0009 . , v katerem Parlament Komisijo poziva, naj mu da „na voljo povzetek informacij o vseh postopkih za ugotavljanje kršitev, sproženih na podlagi uradnega opomina, na zahtevo Parlamenta tudi za posamezne primere”
Texts adopted of that date, P7_TA(2010)0009 . in which it calls on the Commission ‘to make available to Parliament summary information about all infringement procedures based on the letter of formal notice, including, if so requested by Parliament, ... on the issues concerned by the infringement procedure’
19. s posebnim zanimanjem ugotavlja, da se je Komisija zavezala sistematičnemu ocenjevanju odgovorov na pritožbo, ki jih podajo države članice; poziva Komisijo, naj takšno oceno poda zelo natančno in po takojšnji preučitvi zadeve; poziva k pojasnitvi vloge pritožnika v procesu ocenjevanja;
Notes with particular interest the Commission’s commitment to deliver systematically an evaluation of the reply to a complaint provided by a Member State; calls on the Commission to provide such an evaluation with the greatest attention and after prompt analysis of the dossier; calls for a clarification of the role of complainant in the evaluation process;
26. ugotavlja, da imajo nacionalna sodišča bistveno vlogo pri uporabi prava EU in v celoti podpira prizadevanja EU, da okrepi in uskladi usposabljanje za nacionalne sodnike, pravosodne delavce, uradnike in javne uslužbence v nacionalnih upravah;
Notes that the national courts play a vital role in applying European Union law and fully supports the EU’s efforts to enhance and coordinate judicial training for national judges, legal professionals, officials and civil servants in the national administrations;
To poročilo ocenjuje, kako je Komisija spremljala uporabo prava Evropske unije v letu 2008.
This report evaluates the Commission’s monitoring of the application of European Union law in 2008.
Pri analizi se osredotoča na poročilo Komisije o oceni pilotnega projekta EU, v katerem je Komisija predlagala ocenitev uspešnosti tega projekta po 22 mesecih njegovega delovanja.
It focuses its analysis on the Report from the Commission ‘EU Pilot Evaluation Report’ where the Commission proposes an evaluation of the performance of the ‘EU Pilot’ project after its 22 months of operation.
Odbor izpostavlja nekatera ključna vprašanja v zvezi z delovanjem pilotnega projekta EU in vlogo državljanov pri zagotavljanju spoštovanja prava Unije v praksi ter poziva Komisijo, naj posreduje ustrezne podatke, na podlagi katerih bo mogoče preučiti dodatno vrednost, ki jo pilotni projekt EU prinaša obstoječemu procesu ugotavljanja kršitev
The Committee raises some key questions on the functioning of the EU Pilot and on the role of citizens in ensuring compliance with Union law on the ground and asks the Commission to provide relevant data to enable an analysis of the EU Pilot’s added value to the existing infringement process
Zaskrbljenost Parlamenta v zvezi z delovanjem pilotnega projekta EU je obsežno obravnavana v članku Melanie Smith z naslovom „Izvajanje, spremljanje, preverjanje, zunanje izvajanje; nazadovanje procesa za ugotavljanje kršitev”, (2008) 33, European Law Review 777. .
Extensive discussion on Parliament’s concerns about the functioning of the EU Pilot can be found in the article of Melanie Smith ‘Enforcement, monitoring, verification, outsourcing; the decline of the infringement process’ (2008) 33 European Law Review 777. .
Odbor prav tako predlaga, da se Komisijo pozove k predložitvi postopkovnih pravil o postopku za ugotavljanje kršitev v skladu z novo pravno podlago iz člena 298 PDEU, da bi okrepili pravice državljanov in preglednost.
The Committee also suggests calling on the Commission to propose a ‘procedural code’ on the infringement procedure under the new legal basis of article 298 TFEU, in order to enforce citizens’ rights and transparency.
o 26. letnem poročilu o spremljanju uporabe prava Evropske unije (2008)
on 26th Annual Report on Monitoring the Application of European Union Law (2008)
5. poziva k okrepitvi vloge Parlamenta na področju uporabe, izvrševanja in nadzorovanja predpisov o enotnem trgu; podpira zamisel o letnem forumu o enotnem trgu;
Urges the strengthening of Parliament’s role in the areas of the application, enforcement and monitoring of single market rules; supports the idea of an annual Single Market Forum;
7. meni, da bi bilo treba za izboljšanje upravnega sodelovanja razširiti informacijski sistem za notranji trg, ki se trenutno uporablja za storitve, da bi zajemal druge sektorje;
Is of the opinion that, in order to improve administrative cooperation, the Internal Market Information System currently used for services should be extended to cover other sectors;
15. poziva države članice, naj okrepijo svoja prizadevanja, da bi pravilno izvajale pravo EU in zagotavljale njegovo ustrezno uveljavljanje na tistih področjih, ki so jedro enotnega trga, kot so direktiva o storitvah, zakonodaja o javnih naročilih ali direktiva o medsebojnem priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij.
Urges Member States to strengthen their efforts to implement correctly, and to ensure the proper enforcement of, EU law in those fields which are at the core of the single market, such as the Services Directive, public procurement legislation and the directive on mutual recognition of professional qualifications.
Elena Băsescu, Victor Boştinaru, Pascale Gruny, Ágnes Hankiss, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Peter Jahr, Erminia Mazzoni, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli), Ernst Strasser, Diana Wallis, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa
Elena Băsescu, Victor Boştinaru, Pascale Gruny, Ágnes Hankiss, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Peter Jahr, Erminia Mazzoni, Mariya Nedelcheva, Chrysoula Paliadeli, Ernst Strasser, Diana Wallis, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa
o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Salomonovimi otoki
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................11
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT......................................................11
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................15
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS.................................................................15
(Postopek odobritve)
(Consent procedure)
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (09335/2010),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (09335/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Salomonovimi otoki,
– having regard to the draft Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands,
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 43(2) v povezavi s členom 218(6)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0338/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagrph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0338/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za ribištvo ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj in Odbora za proračun ( A7-0292/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets ( A7‑0292/2010 ),
3. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in Salomonovih otokov.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and the Governments and Parliaments of the Member States and Solomon Islands.
Splošni okvir sporazumov o partnerstvu
Partnership agreements – the general context
Sklenitev dvostranskih sporazumov o ribolovu med Evropsko skupnostjo in tretjimi državami je skupna praksa skupne ribiške politike in pomemben steber njene zunanje razsežnosti.
The conclusion of bilateral fisheries agreements between the European Community and non-member countries has been standard practice under the common fisheries policy (CFP) and is central to the policy’s external dimension.
Z reformo skupne ribiške politike leta 2002 je bil uveden pojem „partnerstva“, katerega namen je bil okrepiti cilj Evropske skupnosti, pogodbenice teh sporazumov, da bi podprla razvoj ribiškega sektorja v državah partnericah.
The 2002 reform of the CFP introduced the concept of ‘partnership’, the idea being to bolster the EC’s intention underlying the agreements, namely to support the development of the national fisheries sector in partner countries.
Od leta 2004 se sporazumi imenujejo „sporazumi o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju“.
Since 2004 the agreements have been termed ‘fisheries partnership agreements’ (FPAs).
Sporazumi o partnerstvu so zaveza k spodbujanju odgovornega in trajnostnega ribolova v katerem koli delu sveta, kjer delujejo ribolovna plovila pogodbenic.
The partnership agreements thus amount to a commitment to promoting responsible, sustainable fishing wherever in the world EU vessels might be operating.
Iz tega tudi izhaja, da mora vsak sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju temeljiti na obsežni predhodni oceni razpoložljivih virov, Evropska unija pa mora med drugim tudi zagotoviti, da se ribolovne možnosti, ki jih lahko uporabi, ocenijo v zanesljivih in priznanih znanstvenih mnenjih, da se prepreči tveganje uničenja lokalnih staležev.
That is why, moreover, each FPA has to be based on thorough prior assessment of the resources available, and the EU must also make sure that the fishing opportunities which it may use have been vouched for by credible scientific opinions of recognised validity; the risk of destroying local stocks has to be ruled out.
V sporazumih z afriškimi in pacifiškimi državami je precejšen del finančnega prispevka Evropske unije posebej namenjen podpori nacionalnim ribiškim politikam, ki temeljijo na načelu trajnosti in dobrega upravljanja ribolovnih virov.
Under the agreements with African and Pacific countries, the EU’s financial contribution is to a large extent expressly intended to support national fisheries policies based on the principle of sustainability and sound management of fishery resources.
Evropska unija ima trenutno sklenjenih 16 sporazumov o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju, s katerimi ima flota Skupnosti dostop do ribolovnih virov, ki jih pogodbenice iz katerega koli razloga ne morejo ali ne želijo izkoriščati.
At present the EU has 16 FPAs in force, enabling the Community fleet to have access to stocks which, for one reason or another, partners are unable or do not intend to fish.
Politika razvojnega sodelovanja Evropske unije in skupna ribiška politika morata biti medsebojno povezani in usklajeni, se dopolnjevati ter tako skupaj prispevati k zmanjšanju revščine v državah z razpoložljivimi ribolovnimi viri, ki si prizadevajo za zagotovitev njihovega trajnostnega izkoriščanja in razvoj lokalnih skupnosti.
EU development cooperation policy and the common fisheries policy have to be brought into a coherent, complementary, and coordinated relationship so that they can together help to reduce poverty in countries which have untapped fishery resources that they are seeking to exploit sustainably, while endeavouring to develop their local communities.
Evropski parlament v okviru obravnavanega predloga
Parliament and the current proposal
Z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe so bile Evropskemu parlamentu podeljene večje pristojnosti na področju sporazumov o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju.
Because of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, increased powers have been conferred on Parliament regarding fisheries partnership agreements.
Člen 218(6)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije zdaj določa, da mora sklenitev sporazuma predhodno odobriti Parlament, in tako nadomešča prejšnji postopek posvetovanja.
Under Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Parliament now has to give its prior consent to conclusion of an agreement, a requirement that replaces the earlier ordinary consultation procedure.
Člen 19 Okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo
Point 19 of the framework agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission
123. določa, da „Komisija Parlamentu zagotovi zgodnje in jasne informacije o mednarodnih sporazumih, vključno s trgovinskimi sporazumi, tako med pripravljalno fazo takih sporazumov kot med potekom in zaključkom mednarodnih pogajanj.
123. states that ‘In connection with international agreements, including trade agreements, the Commission shall provide early and clear information to Parliament both during the phase of preparation of the agreements and during the conduct and conclusion of international negotiations.
Člen 218(10) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije med drugim jasno določa, da „[se] Evropski parlament [...] v vseh fazah postopka nemudoma in izčrpno obvesti“.
Article 218(10) of the TFEU has provided for ‘Parliament ... [to] be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure’.
Treba je torej zagotoviti polno izvajanje te zahteve, kot je omenjeno v členu 3(h) Resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu med Parlamentom in Komisijo za naslednje zakonodajno obdobje.
This stipulation must therefore be put fully into effect, as Parliament called for in paragraph 3(h) of its resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA (2010) 009.
Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0009 . .
Sporazumi o partnerstvu med Evropsko skupnostjo/Evropsko unijo in Salomonovimi otoki
EC/EU-Solomon Islands partnership agreements
Salomonovi otoki in Evropska skupnost so februarja 2004 podpisali sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju za tri leta, ki je začel veljati 9. oktobra 2006.
In February 2004 Solomon Islands and the European Community signed a three-year Fisheries Partnership Agreement, which entered into force on 9 October 2006.
Sporazum, ki bo zdaj razveljavljen in nadomeščen z novo revidirano različico (vloženi predlog), je del skupine treh sporazumov za regijo zahodnega in srednjega Pacifika, v katero sta vključena tudi sporazuma o partnerstvu s Kiribatijem in Federativnimi državami Mikronezije.
That agreement, which is now to be repealed and replaced by a new revised version (contained in the proposal currently under consideration), belongs to a set of three agreements with the central and western Pacific region that also comprises the partnership agreements with Kiribati and the Federated States of Micronesia.
Na podlagi pooblastila, ki ga je Komisiji podelil Svet, so Evropska skupnost in Salomonovi otoki s pogajanji dosegli in 26. septembra 2009 parafirali sporazum o partnerstvu, skupaj s protokolom in njegovimi prilogami, za novo obdobje treh let z možnostjo obnovitve.
In keeping with the brief which the Council had given the Commission, the EC and Solomon Islands entered into fresh negotiations and, on 26 September 2009, initialled the resulting new partnership agreement, together with a protocol and the annexes thereto; this agreement will cover a further three-year period and is renewable.
Da bi plovilom Skupnosti zagotovili nadaljevanje ribolovnih dejavnosti, sta pogodbenici parafirali sporazum v obliki izmenjave pisem o začasnem izvajanju sporazuma od 9. oktobra 2009 do začetka veljavnosti novega sporazuma.
To make for continuity in the fishing activities of Community vessels, the two parties have initialled an Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters whereby the new agreement is to be applied on a provisional basis, as from 9 October 2009, pending its entry into force.
Sklep o začasnem izvajanju je Svet sprejel 11. junija 2010.
The decision on this provisional application arrangement was adopted by the Council on 11 June 2010.
Svet je 3. junija 2010 na podlagi člena 43(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejel tudi uredbo, ki določa ključ za razdelitev ribolovnih možnosti med državami članicami za obdobje veljavnosti novega sporazuma o partnerstvu in za obdobje njegovega začasnega izvajanja.
In addition, on 3 June 2010 the Council adopted a regulation based on Article 43(3) of the TFEU allocating fishing opportunities among the Member States for the duration of the new partnership agreement as well as for the provisional application period.
V tabelah je prikazana primerjava med pogoji prvotnega sporazuma in pogoji prenovljenega sporazuma:
The terms of the initial and the new agreement are compared in the tables below:
28. januarja 2004
28 January 2004
Vrsta sporazuma
T ype of agreement
Sporazum o ribolovu tuna
Tuna fisheries agreement
400 000 EUR , od katerih je 30 % namenjenih podpori sektorski politiki za ribištvo Salomonovih otokov, da bi spodbudili trajnost v vodah te države
€ 400 000 ( 30% earmarked as support for the Solomon Islands sectoral fisheries policy to promote sustainability in the country’s waters)
400 000 EUR , od katerih je 50 % namenjenih podpori sektorski politiki za ribištvo Salomonovih otokov, da bi spodbudili trajnost v vodah te države
€ 400 000 ( 50% earmarked as support for the Solomon Islands sectoral fisheries policy to promote sustainability in the country’s waters)
Pristojbina za lastnike plovil
Fee for shipowners
35 EUR na tono ulova
€ 35 per tonne caught
– plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalko: 13 000 EUR/leto (referenčni ulov: 371 t)
- Tuna purse seiners: €13 000 per year (reference catches: 371 t)
6.000 ton/leto
6 000 ton nes per year
4 000 ton/leto
4 000 ton nes per year
Plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalko (2006/2009)
Tuna purse seiners (2006- 2009 )
Plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalko
Tuna purse seiners
Plovila za ribolov s površinskim parangalom
Surface longliners
4 plovila
4 vessels
10 plovil
10 vessels
0 plovil
0 vessels
Pripombe poročevalke
Rapporteur’s comments
Ocena sporazuma o partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Salomonovimi otoki zahteva nekaj raznovrstnih pripomb.
There are several specific points to be made about the EU-Solomon Islands Partnership Agreement.
Najprej je treba poudariti, da izključna ekonomska cona Salomonovih otokov leži v zahodnem Pacifiku, ki je ena od najbogatejših con za ribolov tuna na svetu.
First of all, the Solomon Islands EEZ lies in the western Pacific, one of the world’s richest tuna fishing grounds.
Delež ribiškega sektorja Salomonovih otokov v BDP te države znaša 14 %, kar pojasnjuje velik pomen izkoriščanja ribolovnih virov zanje.
The fact that the Solomon Islands fisheries sector accounts for some 14% of national GDP is the reason why the exploitation of fishery resources is a matter of such immense importance.
Hkrati je splošno stanje staležev tuna v izključni ekonomski coni Salomonovih otokov zadovoljivo, zlasti stanje vrste črtastega tuna.
Secondly, as regards the tuna populations in the Solomon Islands EEZ, in particular of skipjack tuna, their general status is satisfactory.
Kljub temu je iz ocenjevalnega poročila, ki ga je Evropska komisija naročila pri zunanjih svetovalcih, razvidno, da vrstama rumenoplavuti tun in velikooki tun potencialno grozi prekomerno izkoriščanje.
However, the evaluation carried out for the Commission by independent consultants suggests that there may be a risk of overfishing where the yellowfin and bigeye species are concerned.
Tudi na postopkovni ravni so vidiki, ki si zaslužijo našo posebno pozornost in zbujajo skrb, in sicer:
There are also some procedural aspects on which we should focus our attention and which, indeed, give cause for disquiet:
1. prejšnji sporazum se je izkazal kot ekonomsko slabo učinkovit za Evropsko unijo, saj je njegova donosnost manjša od donosnosti drugih sporazumov o ribolovu tunov v drugih regijah;
1. from the economic point of view, the previous agreement did not prove very useful to the EU, as it was less profitable than other tuna fisheries agreements in other regions;
3. ugotavlja se nerazumljivo znatno povečanje prispevka, ki ga plačajo lastniki plovil in je namenjen programu za opazovanje na krovu, kakor je opredeljen v poglavju VI priloge k sporazumu; prispevek se je povečal s 400 EUR na 1500 EUR;
3. the contribution to be paid by shipowners to the on-board observers’ programme, as set out in Chapter VI of the Annex to the Agreement, has been raised substantially – and incomprehensibly – from €400 to €1 500;
4. skupni odbor za spremljanje se v okviru prejšnjega sporazuma ni sestal, čeprav je bilo to predvideno in je ključnega pomena za opredelitev področij sektorskega sodelovanja za izvajanje odgovorne ribolovne prakse v coni, ki jo pokriva sporazum;
4. the Joint Committee, set up to play a monitoring role, did not meet, in spite of the fact that it was supposed to do so under the previous agreement, and that such meetings are essential in order to determine the main focuses of cooperation for the purpose of implementing responsible fishing practices in the area covered by the Agreement.
Po drugi strani je treba opozoriti tudi na nedvomno pozitivne vidike tega sporazuma, in sicer:
On the other hand, the Agreement does offer a number of clear-cut advantages, namely:
Sporazum predvideva spodbujanje sodelovanja na ravni podregije, in sicer v okviru Komisije za ribištvo zahodnega in srednjega Pacifika (WCPFC);
Under the Agreement cooperation is to be promoted at subregional level, specifically within the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC);
2. študija, v kateri je podana ocena sporazuma, je pokazala, da je ohranitev odnosov v ribiškem sektorju s Salomonovimi otoki v velikem interesu Evropske unije, saj prispeva k uspešnemu delovanju njenega sektorja tuna v Pacifiku z dostopom do 4000 ton rib (referenčna vrednost), kar ni zanemarljiva količina za industrijo in trg Skupnosti.
2. the evaluation of the Agreement has made it clear that maintaining fisheries relations with Solomon Islands is very much in the EU’s interest, since this will help to enhance the viability of the EU tuna fishing sector in the Pacific by giving access to 4 000 tonnes of fish (the reference tonnage), a fairly substantial quantity for the industry and the market alike.
Trden pravni okvir, ki ga ponuja sporazum, pomeni okrepitev navedenih vidikov.
The fact that the Agreement will provide a stable legal framework is also useful from that point of view.
Poleg tega je v vzhodnem Atlantiku predvideno izrazito zmanjšanje ribolovnih možnosti za tune zaradi ukrepov za ohranjanje in upravljanje, ki jih je sprejela IATTC (Medameriška komisija za tropske tune), in primerno bi bilo oblikovati alternativne strategije za cono srednjega in vzhodnega Pacifika;
Furthermore, given that tuna fishing opportunities in the East Atlantic are likely to be sharply reduced on account of the conservation and management measures adopted by the IATTC (Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission), it would be advisable to pursue alternative deployment strategies in the central and western Pacific;