natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlogi Komisije na eni strani zajemajo širše območje, ki pokriva splošne vidike elektronskih komunikacij, na drugi strani pa se posvečajo osnovni, tradicionalni telefoniji.
The Commission suggests on the one hand a wide scope, covering e-telecommunications in general, but other parts of the proposal seem to relate to basic, traditional telephony.
Takšna delitev ni smiselna, saj obstaja široka paleta telekomunikacijskih storitev in izdelkov, ki se med seboj zamenjujejo in dopolnjujejo ter so čedalje bolj povezani in prepleteni.
That does not make much sense, as there is a wide range of telecommunications services and products, which replace or complement each other, and which are increasingly connected and integrated.
Telefonske klice dopolnjuje tudi druge glasovne komunikacije, na primer VOIP in prenosni VOIP, oba načina pa se vedno pogosteje uporabljata sočasno na isti napravi.
In addition to telephone calls there is other voice communication such as VOIP and mobile VOIP, and increasingly the two are used simultaneously from the same device.
Prenosni telefoni se uporabljajo tudi kot sistemi za plačevanje ali navigacijski sistemi, pri tem pa komunicirajo z informacijskimi omrežji v območju.
Mobile phones also serve as payment devices or navigation systems, communicating with information networks about the area.
V prihodnosti utegne biti pisarniška oprema povezana v splet, naprava za radiofrekvenčno identifikacijo v hladilniku bo komunicirala s trgovino, prenosni telefoni pa bodo sprejemali programsko vsebino ali novice.
Office systems may be web based in the future, whereas the RFID in our fridge communicates with the supermarket and our mobile phones capture broadcasts or news services.
Shranjevanje podatkov in dostop do njih ne poteka več z ene same lokacije.
Furthermore, data are no longer stored or accessed in a single geographical location.
Sedeži ponudnikov so razpršeni po vsem svetu, dostop do spletnih sistemov je mogoč od domala koder koli, komunikacije pa se usmerjajo prek različnih celin.
Providers have their headquarters all over the world, web based systems can be accessed from almost anywhere, communications are routed via different continents.
Razume se, da predpisi, ki veljajo za določeno zemljepisno območje, ne zadoščajo več, zato predstavljajo oviro za podjetja, ki delujejo v različnih pravnih sistemih.
It is clear that rules applying to a specific geographical area are no longer sufficient, and that they are an obstacle for businesses operating under different legal regimes.
Potreba po globalnih predpisih postaja čedalje izrazitejša.
The need for global rules is becoming more and more urgent.
Osebni podatki niso več zgolj stranski proizvod gospodarske dejavnosti, temveč oblikujejo njeno jedro.
Personal data are no longer a by product of economic activity, but at the very heart of it.
Podatki so postali velik posel.
Data are big business.
Zaradi navedenega se je treba tej zadevi posvetiti v okviru čezatlantskega gospodarskega sveta.
Therefore it seems appropriate to address this issue in the context of the Transatlantic Economic Council.
Število vlad, ki zahtevajo dostop do osebnih podatkov, ki so v rokah ponudnikov storitev ali drugih nevladnih organizacij, naglo narašča.
Thirdly, there is a rapidly growing trend of governments requiring access to personal data held by service providers or by other (non governmental) parties.
Vendar pa se sistemi za varstvo podatkov, ki se nanašajo na kateri koli posamezen niz podatkov, med seboj razlikujejo in so odvisni od tega, kdo zbira oziroma uporablja podatke in v kakšne namene.
However, the regimes for data protection that apply to any single set of data vary according to what party collects or uses the data and for what purpose.
Z vidika uporabnika je takšna delitev med prvim in tretjim stebrom ter med različnimi generalnimi direktorati Evropske komisije nerazumljiva, podjetja pa takšno stanje spravlja v pravno negotovost in lahko omaja zaupanje njihovih uporabnikov.
From the perspective of the user this division between first and third pillar, and between different European Commission DGs is incomprehensible, and for business this creates legal uncertainty and it may undermine the confidence of their users.
Tako je državljanom težko razložiti, zakaj bi za ponudnika telekomunikacijskih storitev veljali predpisi za priglaševanje kršitev, za vlado, ki uporabi podatke tega ponudnika (kot v primeru telekomunikacijskih podatkov iz direktive o hrambi podatkov), pa ti predpisi ne bi veljali.
Thus it is hard to explain to citizens why a telecoms provider would be subject to rules on breach notification, but if a government uses the very same data held by that provider (as is the case for example with telecoms data under the Data Retention Directive), those rules do not apply.
Z ozirom na čedalje večjo prepletenost vseh vrst omrežij in storitev je prav tako težko pojasniti, zakaj za druge ponudnike storitev, na primer banke in družbe, ki izdajajo kreditne kartice, ne bi veljali enaki predpisi za priglaševanje kršitev.
Given the increasingly intertwined nature of all kinds of networks and services, it is equally hard to explain why other sectors than telecoms would not be subject to the same rules for breach notification, such as banks or credit card companies.
Glede na navedeno je takšen postopen pristop Komisije preveč omejen in posledično neučinkovit.
In view of this the piecemeal approach of the Commission seems too limited and therefore ineffective.
Obvezen pregled direktive je treba izkoristiti za popolno prenovo sistema varstva podatkov, pri tem pa upoštevati dejstvo, da bo z začetkom veljave lizbonske pogodbe odpravljena razlika med prvim in tretjim stebrom, Evropski parlament pa bo imel vsa zakonodajna pooblastila.
The compulsory review of the Directive should be used for a complete overhaul of the data protection regime, taking account of the fact that after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty the difference between the first and third pillar will disappear, and the European Parliament will have full legislative powers.
Predlagana obveza priglaševanja kršitev je nadvse dobrodošla, paleta 27 različnih ureditev pa je nezaželena, saj podjetja spravlja v pravno negotovost in je nepregledna za uporabnike.
The proposed obligation of breach notification is very welcome, however a patchwork of 27 different versions of the regime is undesirable, as it creates legal uncertainty for business, and it is not transparent for users.
Prav tako bi bilo smiselno upoštevati izkušnje s takimi ureditvami v drugih državah, zlasti v ZDA, saj se nahajajo v podobnem položaju (predpisi za priglaševanje kršitev sodijo v domeno posameznih držav in se ne izvajajo na zvezni ravni).
Furthermore, it would be wise to draw on the experience with such regimes in other countries, notably the US as they are in a similar situation (breach notification rules being a matter for the states rather than a federal competence).
Postopek priglaševanja mora biti zasnovan tako, da so uporabniki pravočasno in v celoti obveščeni o kršitvi, ki predstavlja nevarnost, pri tem pa ne sme prihajati do prepogostih lažnih alarmov.
The notification procedure must be such that users are fully and timely informed in case of a breach that is potentially harmful, but without sending false alerts so often that it becomes "crying wolf".
Komisija mora imeti zadostna pooblastila, da izvede potrebne tehnične ukrepe.
The Commission must have the necessary powers to take the necessary technical implementing powers.
V luči naglega tehnološkega razvoja morajo biti postopki hitri in enostavni.
In view of rapid technological developments the procedures should be simple and quick.
Nekateri vidiki pa niso izključno tehnične narave, zato ostajajo predmet demokratskega nadzora.
However, certain aspects are not purely technical, and should remain subject to democratic scrutiny.
Določiti je treba, katere vidike sme spremeniti Komisija, kateri pa zahtevajo sodelovanje parlamenta.
It must be established which aspects can be changed by the Commission, and which need parliamentary involvement
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov kot pristojni odbor, da v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(32) Pri določanju podrobnih pravil o obliki zapisa in postopkih, ki se uporabljajo za priglasitev kršitev varnosti, je treba ustrezno upoštevati okoliščine kršitve, vključno s tem, ali so bili osebni podatki zaščiteni s kodo ali z drugimi sredstvi, ki učinkovito zmanjšujejo verjetnost lažnega prikazovanja identitete ali drugih oblik zlorabe.
(32) In setting detailed rules concerning the format and procedures applicable to the notification of security breaches, due consideration should be given to the circumstances of the breach, including whether or not the personal data had been protected by encryption or other means, effectively limiting the likelihood of identity fraud or other forms of misuse.
Poleg tega morajo taka pravila in postopki upoštevati zakonite interese organov kazenskega pregona, če bi zgodnje razkritje lahko oviralo preiskavo okoliščin kršitve.
Moreover, such rules and procedures should take into account the legitimate interests of law enforcement authorities in cases where early disclosure could unnecessarily hamper the investigation of the circumstances of a breach.
Pravila in postopki ne smejo ovirati preiskave okoliščin kršitve , ki jo izvajajo organi kazenskega pregona .
The rules and procedures should not hamper the investigation by law enforcement authorities of the circumstances of a breach.
Končni uporabniki morajo poznati tveganja, katerim so izpostavljeni pri uporabi interneta, prenosih z interneta in pri uporabi programske opreme ali nosilcev shranjevanja podatkov.
End-users should understand the risks they face while surfing the internet, when they download and use software or data storage media.
Končni uporabniki se morajo tudi zavedati teh tveganj in ustrezno zaščititi svojo terminalsko opremo.
End-users should be aware of the risks that are present and act accordingly to protect their terminal equipment.
Države članice pa morajo spodbujati ozaveščenost na tem področju.
Member States should stimulate the awareness raising in this area.
(34) Programska oprema, ki prikrito spremlja dejanja uporabnika in/ali uničuje uporabnikovo terminalsko opremo v korist tretje stranke (tako imenovana vohunska programska oprema“), lahko resno ogroža zasebnost uporabnikov.
(34) Software that surreptitiously monitors actions of the user and/or subverts operation of the user’s terminal equipment for the benefit of a third party (so-called “spyware”) poses a serious threat to users’ privacy.
Države članice morajo končne uporabnike spodbujati, da naredijo vse, kar je potrebno za zaščito njihove terminalske opreme pred virusi in vohunsko programsko opremo.
Member States should encourage end-users to take the necessary steps to protect their terminal equipment against viruses and spy ware.
Enako kot pri predlogu spremembe 10.
Same as am 10.
V tej direktivi so določene pravice končnih uporabnikov in ustrezne obveznosti podjetij pri zagotavljanju javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev.
This Directive establishes the rights of end-users and the corresponding obligations on undertakings providing publicly available electronic communications networks and services.
V zvezi z zagotavljanjem univerzalne storitve v okolju odprtih in konkurenčnih trgov ta direktiva opredeljuje minimalni nabor storitev določene kakovosti, do katerih imajo ob upoštevanju posebnih nacionalnih pogojev dostop vsi končni uporabniki po dostopni ceni, ne da bi se s tem izkrivljala konkurenca.
With regard to ensuring provision of universal service within an environment of open and competitive markets, this Directive defines the minimum set of services of specified quality to which all end-users have access, at an affordable price in the light of specific national conditions, without distorting competition.
V tej direktivi so določene tudi obveznosti glede zagotavljanja nekaterih obveznih storitev.
This Directive also sets out obligations with regard to the provision of certain mandatory services.
V zvezi z zagotavljanjem univerzalne storitve v okolju odprtih in konkurenčnih trgov ta direktiva opredeljuje minimalni nabor storitev določene kakovosti, do katerih imajo ob upoštevanju stanja tehnologije, posebnih nacionalnih pogojev dostop vsi končni uporabniki po dostopni ceni, ne da bi se s tem izkrivljala konkurenca.
With regard to ensuring provision of universal service within an environment of open and competitive markets, this Directive defines the minimum set of services of specified quality to which all end-users have access, at an affordable price in the light of the state of technology and specific national conditions, without distorting competition.
Direktiva mora zagotoviti univerzalne storitve in tudi, da ponudniki storitev glede tega izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti.
The Directive must ensure that universal service is guaranteed and that service providers fulfil their obligations with regard to this aim.
Države članice zagotovijo, da vsaj eno podjetje izpolnjuje utemeljene zahteve za priključitev na javno komunikacijsko omrežje na fiksni lokaciji.
Member States shall ensure that all reasonable requests for connection at a fixed location to a public communications network are met by at least one undertaking.
Države članice zagotovijo, da vsaj eno podjetje izpolnjuje utemeljene zahteve za priključitev na javno komunikacijsko omrežje ali priključitev na celično omrežje na fiksni lokaciji.
Member States shall ensure that all reasonable requests for connection at a fixed location to a public communications network or connection to a cellular network are met by at least one undertaking.
Zagotovljeni priključek podpira govorne faksimilne in podatkovne komunikacije z dovolj velikimi podatkovnimi hitrostmi, da omogočajo funkcionalen dostop do interneta, pri čemer se upoštevajo prevladujoče tehnologije, ki jih uporablja večina naročnikov, in tehnična izvedljivost.
The connection provided shall be capable of supporting voice, facsimile and data communications, at data rates that are sufficient to permit functional Internet access, taking into account prevailing technologies used by the majority of subscribers and technological feasibility.
Zagotovljeni priključek mora podpirati govorne faksimilne in podatkovne komunikacije z dovolj velikimi podatkovnimi hitrostmi, da omogočajo funkcionalen dostop do interneta, pri čemer se upoštevajo prevladujoče tehnologije, ki jih uporablja večina naročnikov, in tehnična izvedljivost.
The connection provided must be capable of supporting voice, facsimile and data communications, at data rates that are sufficient to permit functional Internet access, taking into account prevailing technologies used by the majority of subscribers and technological feasibility.
Države članice zagotovijo, da vsaj eno podjetje izpolnjuje utemeljene zahteve za zagotavljanje telefonske storitve prek omrežne povezave iz odstavka 1, ki omogoča govorne in podatkovne komunikacije z dovolj velikimi podatkovnimi hitrostmi, da omogočajo funkcionalen dostop do interneta, pri čemer se upoštevajo prevladujoče tehnologije, ki jih uporablja večina uporabnikov, in tehnična izvedljivost.
Member States shall ensure that all reasonable requests for the provision of a telephone service over the network connection referred to in paragraph 1, allowing voice and data communication at data rates that are sufficient to permit functional Internet access, taking into account prevailing technologies used by the majority of subscribers and technological feasibility, are met by at least one undertaking.
Države članice zagotovijo, da vsaj eno podjetje izpolnjuje utemeljene zahteve za zagotavljanje telefonske storitve prek omrežne povezave iz odstavka 1, ki omogoča odpravljanje in sprejemanje medkrajevnih in mednarodnih klicev in klicev storitev v sili na številko "112".
Member States shall ensure that all reasonable requests for provision of a telephone service over the network connection referred to in paragraph 1, allowing originating and receiving of national and international calls and calls to emergency services via the number "112" are met by at least one undertaking.
Države članice zagotovijo, da vsaj eno podjetje izpolnjuje utemeljene zahteve za zagotavljanje telekomunikacijske storitve in storitve podatkovne komunikacije prek omrežne povezave iz odstavka 1, ki omogoča odpravljanje in sprejemanje medkrajevnih in mednarodnih komunikacij, podatkov in komunikacijskih storitev v sili na številko " 112 " .
Member States shall ensure that all reasonable requests for provision of a telecommunication and data communication service over the network connection referred to in paragraph 1, allowing originating and receiving of national and international communications, data and communications to emergency services via the number "112" are met by at least one undertaking.
(4a) V členu 6 se naslov nadomesti z naslednjim:
(4a) In Article 6, the title shall be replaced by the following:
„Javni plačilni telefoni in druge točke za dostop do telekomunikacij“
"Public pay telephones and other telecommunication access points "
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko nacionalni regulativni organi naložijo podjetjem obveznosti, s čimer poskrbijo, da so javni plačilni telefoni ali druge točke za dostop do telekomunikacij na voljo za izpolnitev ustreznih potreb končnih uporabnikov v zvezi z geografsko pokritostjo, številom telefonov ali dostopnih točk do drugih vrst telekomunikacij, dostopnostjo takih telefonov uporabnikom invalidom in kakovostjo storitev."
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities can impose obligations on undertakings in order to ensure that public pay telephones or other telecommunication access points are provided to meet the reasonable needs of end-users in terms of the geographical coverage, the number of telephones or other telecommunications access points , the accessibility to disabled users and the quality of services."
Države članice lahko izven okvira predpisov za določena podjetja o zagotavljanju posebnih tarifnih opcij ali o upoštevanju zamejitve cen ali geografske porazdelitve ali drugih podobnih shem zagotovijo podporo potrošnikom z nizkimi prihodki ali posebnimi socialnimi potrebami.“
Member States may , besides any provisions for designated undertakings to provide special tariff options or to comply with price caps or geographical averaging or other similar schemes , ensure that support is provided to consumers identified as having low incomes, disability or special social needs.
Izvirno besedilo pokriva vse primere, vključno z invalidnimi osebami.
The original text covers all cases, including people with disabilities.
Člen 20 – odstavek 6 a (novo)
Article 20 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Države članice morajo potrošnikom zagotoviti svobodo izbire in nuditi zadostno raven zaščite pred izdelki, ki jim neupravičeno kratijo to svobodo, na primer neutemeljene dolgoročne pogodbe, vezava na izdelke ter stroški ali kazni za menjavo ponudnika.
Member States shall ensure freedom of choice for consumers and shall provide an adequate level of protection against products that unduly restrict that freedom , such as contracts of unreasonably long duration, product tying , and fees or penalties for changing provider.
Ponudniki morajo imeti možnost, da ponudijo pester izbor izdelkov, države članice pa morajo potrošnikom zagotoviti svobodo pri izboru.
Although providers should be able to offer a wide range of products, Member States must ensure that consumers are free to choose.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so končnim uporabnikom in potrošnikom v skladu z določbami Priloge II na voljo pregledne, primerljive, ustrezne in najnovejše informacije o veljavnih cenah in tarifah ter o standardnih določilih in pogojih za dostop do storitev, ki so določene v členih 4, 5, 6 in 7, in njihovo uporabo .
Member States shall ensure that transparent, comparable, adequate and up-to date information on applicable prices and tariffs, and on standard terms and conditions, in respect of access to and use of the services identified in Articles 4, 5, 6, and 7 is available to end-users and consumers, in accordance with the provisions of Annex II.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so končnim uporabnikom in potrošnikom v skladu z določbami Priloge II na voljo pregledne, primerljive, ustrezne in najnovejše informacije o veljavnih cenah in tarifah ter o standardnih določilih in pogojih .
Member States shall ensure that transparent, comparable, adequate and up-to date information on applicable prices and tariffs, and on standard terms and conditions, is available to end-users and consumers, in accordance with the provisions of Annex II.
Te informacije se objavijo v lahko dostopni obliki.
Such information shall be published in an easily accessible form.
Preglednost je bistvenega pomena za vse telekomunikacijske storitve, zato morajo biti informacije objavljene v dostopni obliki.
Transparency is essential for all telecommunication services and should be published in an accessible form.
Da se zagotovi, da imajo končni uporabniki koristi od doslednega pristopa k preglednosti tarif ter posredovanja informacij v skladu s členom 20(5) v Skupnosti, lahko Komisija po posvetovanju z organom za evropski trg elektronskih komunikacij (v nadaljnjem besedilu organ“), sprejme ustrezne tehnične izvedbene ukrepe na tem področju, kot je opredelitev metodologije ali postopkov.
In order to ensure that end-users can benefit from a consistent approach to tariff transparency, as well as to the provision of information in accordance with Article 20(5) in the Community, the Commission may, having consulted the European Electronic Communications Market Authority (hereinafter referred to as “the Authority”), take the appropriate technical implementing measures in this area, such as specify the methodology or procedures.
Ti ukrepi, katerih namen je sprememba nebistvenih elementov te direktive z njeno dopolnitvijo, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 37(2).
Those measures , designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it , shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 37(2).
Da se prepreči poslabšanje storitve in upočasnitev prometa v omrežjih, lahko Komisija, po posvetovanju z organom, sprejme tehnične izvedbene ukrepe o minimalni kakovosti zahtev glede storitev , ki jih nacionalni regulativni organ določi za podjetja, ki zagotavljajo javna komunikacijska omrežja.
In order to prevent degradation of service and slowing of traffic over networks, the Commission may, having consulted the Authority, adopt technical implementing measures concerning minimum quality of service requirements to be set by the national regulatory authority on undertakings providing public communications networks.
Države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev , da ponudniki storitev izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti glede univerzalne storitve, predvsem z razpoložljivostjo javno dostopnih telefonskih storitev, ki se zagotavljajo prek javnih komunikacijskih omrežij, zlasti v primerih katastrofalnega razpada omrežja ali višje sile.
Member States shall take all necessary steps to ensure that service providers fulfil their obligation of universal service, in particular through the availability of publicly available telephone services provided over public communications networks , in the event of catastrophic network breakdown or in cases of force majeure.
Enako kot pri predlogu spremembe 3.
Same as am.3.
Člen 26 – odstavek 7 – pododstavek 2
Article 26 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Člen 28 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 28 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1