natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice spodbujajo razvoj evropskih referenčnih mrež izvajalcev storitev zdravstvenega varstva.
Member States shall facilitate the development of the European reference networks of healthcare providers .
Navedene mreže so vedno odprte za nove izvajalce storitev zdravstvenega varstva, ki se jim želijo pridružiti, pod pogojem, da takšni izvajalci storitev zdravstvenega varstva izpolnjujejo vse zahtevane pogoje in merila.
Those networks shall at all times be open for new healthcare providers which might wish to join them, provided that such healthcare providers fulfil all the required conditions and criteria
Države članice spodbujajo razvoj evropskih referenčnih mrež izvajalcev storitev zdravstvenega varstva in okrepijo izkušnjo sodelovanja v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom v okviru evropskih skupin za čezmejno sodelovanje.
Member States shall facilitate the development of the European reference networks of healthcare providers and enhance the experience of cooperation as regards healthcare within the European cross-border cooperation groupings .
Na zdravstvenem področju so evropske skupine za čezmejno sodelovanje pomemben instrument, ki že obstaja.
The EGCC is, on the level of cross-border health cooperation, an important and already existing instrument.
Najboljše prakse teh skupin bi lahko uporabili za nadaljnji razvoj v zvezi s to direktivo.
Best practices from the EGCC could be used for further developments in the field of this directive.
Člen 15 – odstavek 2 – točka f a (novo)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) zagotoviti učinkovit dostop do zdravstvenega varstva za vse, zlasti zaradi boja proti razlikam pri zdravstvenih rezultatih tako v državah članicah kot med njimi;
(fa) to help ensure effective access to healthcare for all, in particular with a view to combating inequalities in healthcare outcomes, both between and within Member States;
To je eden glavnih elementov politik zdravstvenega varstva.
This is one of the central elements of the healthcare policies.
Člen 15 – odstavek 2 – točka f b (novo)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point f b (new)
(fb) vzpostaviti zbirko podatkov za vse izvajalce storitev zdravstvenega varstva ter informacije o posebni specializaciji, da se oblikuje seznam centrov odličnosti;
(fb) to establish a database of all healthcare providers and information on the specific specialisations, in order to establish a list of centres of excellence;
To je lahko pacientom v pomoč pri pravilni izbiri bolnišnice.
This can help patients to make the right choice for a specific hospital.
Države članice, ki kupujejo e-zdravstvene storitve zdravstvenih izvajalcev in delavcev iz drugih držav članic, zagotovijo, da imajo ti ustrezen status in so ustrezno usposobljeni ter da so prek ustreznih pristojnih organov prikazali, da so usposobljeni za opravljanje in zagotavljanje e-zdravstvenih storitev.
Member States purchasing e-health services from providers and professionals in other Member States shall ensure that such providers and professionals are appropriately regulated and qualified and that they have demonstrated, via the relevant competent authority, that they are fit to practise and to provide e-health services.
Prav tako spremljajo trende in vzorce v zvezi z nezaželenimi incidenti ali sistemskimi napakami na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva.
They shall also monitor trends and patterns in relation to adverse incidents or systems failures in respect of cross-border care.
Spremljanje trendov in vzorcev v zvezi z nezaželenimi incidenti ali sistemskimi napakami na področju čezmejne oskrbe bo državam članicam in Komisiji omogočilo, da bodo lahko prepoznale težave, ki bodo morebiti nastale pri izvajanju te direktive.
The monitoring of trends and patterns in relation to adverse incidents or systems failures in respect of cross-border care will enable Member States and the Commission to identify some of the problems that may arise following the implementation of this Directive.
Cilj te zbirke podatkov je oceniti, ali ta direktiva prispeva k prostemu pretoku bolnikov, kakovosti zdravstvenega varstva na splošno ter načelu enakega dostopa za vse.
The aim of that data collection is to assess whether this Directive contributes to the mobility of patients, the quality of the healthcare in general, and the principle of access for all.
Treba je poudariti, da bi morali zbrani podatki glede na cilj direktive pripomoči k oceni, ali je bil ta cilj dosežen.
It needs to be stressed that, given the aim of the Directive, the collected data should help assessing if the Directive accomplishes this aim.
V poročilu (člen 20) bi to morala biti ena od glavnih točk.
Also in the report (Article 20) this should be one of the main elements.
Člen 18 – odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 18 - paragraph 3 a (new)
Zbiranje podatkov v okviru tega člena bo potekalo v tesnem sodelovanju z zbiranjem podatkov, ki jih zagotavlja Upravna komisija za socialno varnost delavcev migrantov.
The collection of data in the context of this Article shall be done in close cooperation with the collection of data provided for by the Administrative Commission on Social Security for Migrant Workers.
Tesno sodelovanje pri zbiranju podatkov v okviru te direktive in zbiranju podatkov v skladu s pravili za usklajevanje sistemov socialne varnosti bo omogočilo celovitejši prikaz čezmejnega gibanja ljudi na področju zdravstvenega varstva.
Close cooperation on the collection of data under this Directive and the collection of data under the rules on the coordination of social security schemes will allow drawing a more comprehensive image of cross-border flows of people in the field of healthcare.
Komisija zagotovi, da se zberejo podatki, potrebni za opis čezmejnega gibanja pacientov in zdravnikov, da bi lahko pravočasno popravili vse neželene učinke in še naprej spodbujali pozitivne.
The Commission shall ensure that the requisite information is gathered to chart cross-border flows of patients and practitioners so as to be able to remedy any adverse effects promptly and to further encourage positive effects.
Komisija vključi te informacije v poročilo iz odstavka 1.
The Commission shall include this information in the report referred to in paragraph 1.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare
Storitve zdravstvenega varstva so bile izključene iz direktive o storitvah, ker zajemajo storitve splošnega pomena in jih mora urejati posebna zakonodaja, ki bo zagotovila popolno spoštovanje načela enakosti dostopa, univerzalnosti, kakovosti, varnosti in solidarnosti.
Healthcare services were excluded from the services directive as they involve tasks carried out in the public interest and must be covered by specific legislation which ensures absolute compliance with the principles of equal access, universality, quality, safety and solidarity.
Zdravstveno varstvo se ne more obravnavati kot običajni proizvod notranjega trga, ker storitve zdravstvenega varstva znatno prispevajo h ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji Evropske unije.
Healthcare cannot be considered an ordinary product in the internal market because healthcare services make a strong contribution to the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the European Union.
Direktiva o pravicah pacientov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva mora zato zagotoviti, da to ne bo sredstvo za spodbujanje „zdravstvenega turizma“, ki bi, če bi se razvilo, lahko ustvarilo resnično neenakost pri dostopu do varstva in privedlo do zdravstvenega sistema dveh hitrosti, ki bi ga uporabljali le bolje informirani in premožnejši pacienti.
A directive on patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare must therefore take care not to be a tool for promoting ‘medical tourism’, which if it were to develop could create genuine inequality of access to care, leading to a two-speed healthcare system which would benefit only the best informed and better-off patients.
V skladu z ustanovnimi pogodbami, ki zagotavljajo osnovne svoboščine gibanja in ob spoštovanju načela subsidiarnosti, ki vsaki državi članici priznava pristojnost za organiziranje, upravljanje in financiranje svojega sistema zdravstva in socialnega varstva, lahko Evropska unija prispeva pomembno dodano vrednost v okviru mobilnosti pacientov.
In accordance with the Treaties guaranteeing basic freedoms of movement, and in compliance with the subsidiarity principle acknowledging each Member State’s authority to organise, manage and finance their own system of healthcare and social protection, the European Union can provide vital added value in the context of patient mobility.
Zapletenost, raznolikost in specifičnost zdravstvenih sistemov zahteva kar najboljše sodelovanje med državami na področju raziskav, zdravstvenih in upravnih informacij ter poglobljen razmislek o tem, kako najti povezavo med temi specifičnimi značilnostmi, da bi zagotovili pravno varnost pacientov, zdravstvenih delavcev in izvajalcev zdravstvenih storitev.
The complexity, variety and specific features of healthcare systems necessitate optimum cooperation between countries on research and medical and administrative information, as well as in-depth consideration as to how these specific features should be structured in order to ensure legal certainty, for patients and for health professionals and care providers.
Predlog Komisije to enačbo le delno rešuje s kodifikacijo sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, ki so ravno posledica priznane pravne praznine.
The Commission proposal provides only a very partial answer to this equation, by merely codifying the decisions of the Court of Justice, which are precisely the consequence of an acknowledged legal vacuum.
Besedilo je glede opredelitev ključnih pojmov (bolnišnična in nebolnišnična oskrba, izvajanje oskrbe, primerna čakalna doba, škoda ...), podrobnosti glede povezave direktive z obstoječima uredbama (1408/71 in 883/2004), upoštevanja nadaljevanja zdravljenja in odgovornosti v primeru pooperativnih zapletov ter vzajemnega priznavanja receptov popolnoma nezadostno, povečuje pravno negotovost, namesto da bi jo odpravilo.
As regards defining the key concepts (hospital and non-hospital care, healthcare provision, reasonable waiting times, harm, etc.), details as to how the directive links in with the existing regulations (1408/71 and 883/2004), assuming the costs of continuing care and responsibilities in the event of post-operation complications, and the mutual recognition of prescriptions, the text is totally insufficient, and increases the legal uncertainty rather than removing it.
Pojasniti je treba pravila o določanju cen in povračil ter pogoje, ki v državah članicah urejajo sistem zahtevkov za predhodno odobritev, da bi zagotovili prevzem stroškov oskrbe in ne bi ustvarjali neenakosti med pacienti.
It is important to clarify the rules on tariffs and reimbursement, as well as the conditions governing the system of requiring prior authorisation by the Member States for guaranteeing that healthcare costs are assumed, and thus not create inequalities between patients.
Predhodna odobritev mora biti zasnovana kot priložnost (in ne kot ovira mobilnosti) za paciente, da so bolje informirani in da so deležni svetovanja pri iskanju najustreznejšega zdravljenja ob spoštovanju načela nediskriminacije.
Prior authorisation should be viewed as an opportunity for patients to be better informed and advised when seeking the most appropriate care, in line with the principle of non-discrimination, rather than an obstruction to mobility.
Poleg tega zagotavlja ohranjanje najpomembnejših funkcij storitev javnega zdravstva, in sicer socialne in teritorialne kohezije ter ohranjanje finančnega ravnotežja javnih sistemov socialnega zavarovanja, ki zagotavljajo pravo politično solidarnost na področju zdravstva.
Moreover, it ensures that the essential functions of public health services are preserved: social and territorial cohesion and maintaining the financial equilibrium of public social security systems, which are what guarantees a genuine policy of solidarity on healthcare.
Za zdravljenje, ki ne potrebuje predhodne odobritve, omogoča predhodna izjava preverjanje, ali je pacient pred odhodom prejel vse potrebne informacije.
For care which is not subject to authorisation, a prior declaration would make it possible to verify that the patient had received all the necessary information before departure.
Zaradi staranja prebivalstva, ki ima za posledico težave pri ločevanju med zdravstvenim in socialnim področjem, je treba predvideti koncept dolgoročne oskrbe, saj ta vprašanja zadevajo številne države članice.
In the context of an ageing population, which makes it difficult to distinguish the medical from the social, it is important to provide for the concept of long-term care, as many Member States are affected by this problem.
Povezava med mobilnostjo pacientov in vprašanjem zdravstvenih delavcev je nujna glede na močno povezanost obeh strani, da bi zagotovili kakovost in varnost oskrbe na eni strani ter da ne bi porušili ravnotežja zdravstvene demografije v nekaterih državah članicah na drugi.
It is vital to structure the relationship between patient mobility and the issue of healthcare professionals, given the strong link which exists between the two parties, in order to ensure the quality and safety of care while ensuring that imbalances are not created in the medical demography of certain Member States.
Ker obenem ni razmisleka o položaju strokovnjakov, njihovi usposobljenosti ter priznavanju kvalifikacij je pomanjkljivost, ki škoduje pacientom, saj direktiva iz leta 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij ni prilagojena sektorju zdravstvenega varstva.
This absence of simultaneous reflection on the situation of professionals, their training and the recognition of their qualifications is a shortcoming which is damaging to the patients themselves, as the 2005 Directive on the recognition of professional qualifications is not appropriate for the healthcare sector.
Javno zdravstvo je izrednega pomena za gospodarski razvoj.
Public health is key to economic development.
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov poziva Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane kot pristojni odbor, naj v svoje poročilo vključi naslednje predloge sprememb:
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
To direktivo je treba izvajati in uporabljati zlasti ob upoštevanju pravic do zasebnega in družinskega življenja, varstva osebnih podatkov, enakosti pred zakonom in načela nediskriminacije ter pravice do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in pravičnega sojenja v skladu s splošnimi pravnimi načeli, kakor so določena v členih 7, 8, 20, 21 in 47 Listine.
Specifically, this Directive has to be implemented and applied with due respect for the rights to private and family life, protection of personal data, equality before the law and the principle of non-discrimination and the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, in accordance with the general principles of law, as enshrined in Articles 7, 8, 20, 21, 47 of the Charter.
(3) Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva splošna pravna načela, kakor so priznana zlasti z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
(3) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the general principles of law as recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Pojavila se je zaskrbljenost, da bodo morda države članice morale financirati etično sporne medicinske „storitve“, kot so evtanazija, testiranje DNK ali umetne oploditve, čeprav zadevna storitev v zadevni državi članici ni dovoljena oziroma se je vsaj ne financira.
Concerns have been raised that ethically controversial medical "services" like euthanasia, DNA-testing or IVF maybe have to be financed by the Member States even if the relevant service is not allowed, or at least not financed, in the relevant Member States.
Za storitve, ki so očitno nezakonite, kot je evtanazija, ni dvoma, vendar bi morda pomagalo, da se ta zadeva pojasni.
For services which are clearly illegal, like euthanasia, there should be no doubt, but it may be helpful to clarify this point.
Na drugih področjih, kot je testiranje DNK, je stanje bolj zapleteno, saj ga nobena država članica ne prepoveduje, imajo pa glede tega nekoliko različne pogoje (na primer obvezno svetovanje pred testiranjem).
In other areas, like DNA-testing, the situation is more complicated because it is not banned in any Member State but the conditions are quite different (for example obligation to do counselling before testing).
(5a) Ta direktiva spoštuje pravico vsake države članice, da izbere tisto obliko zdravstvenega varstva, za katero meni, da je primerna, ter v to pravico ne posega.
(5a) This Directive respects and does not prejudice the freedom of each Member State to decide what type of health care it considers appropriate.
Nobena določba te direktive se ne sme razlagati tako, da bi ogrožala temeljne etične odločitve držav članic, zlasti glede varovanja pravice do življenja vsakega človeškega bitja.
No provision of this Directive shall be interpreted in a way as to undermine the fundamental ethical choices of Member States, in particular as regards the protection of the right to life of every human being.
(5b) Pacienti in izvajalci zdravstvenih storitev imajo v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti pravico, da zdravstveno oskrbo prejemajo oziroma nudijo v kateri koli državi članici.
(5b) In accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU, patients and care providers have the right to go to any Member State for medical assistance.
Zato je izrednega pomena, da obstaja čim manj ovir za čezmejni pretok pacientov in čezmejno ponudbo storitev zdravstvenega varstva v Evropski uniji.
It is therefore of the utmost importance that cross-border movement of patients and cross-border health services should be hampered as little as possible within the European Union.
Enotni standardi notranjega trga morajo vedno imeti prednost.
The common standards of the internal market must always take priority.
Čeprav so sistemi zdravstvenega varstva v pristojnosti držav članic, pacienti in zdravstveni delavci prečkajo meje, zato mora biti Evropska unija dejavna na tem področju.
Although care systems are a matter for the Member States, patients and care workers move across borders, so that the European Union needs to be active in these fields.
Obenem mora biti čim manj formalnih ovir in omejitev za to prehajanje pacientov in zdravstvenih delavcev, da bi lahko zagotovili prosti pretok oseb v Evropski uniji.
At the same time, this movement of patients and care workers should be hampered as little as possible by restrictions in order to be able to guarantee the free movement of persons in the European Union .
(8) Cilj te direktive je vzpostaviti splošni okvir za izvajanje varnega, visoko kakovostnega in učinkovitega čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v Skupnosti , zagotavljanje mobilnosti pacientov in pravice opravljanja zdravstvenega varstva in visoke ravni varovanja zdravja ter lažje zagotavljanje čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva , ob popolnem upoštevanju pristojnosti držav članic pri opredeljevanju koristi socialne varnosti v zvezi z zdravjem ter organizaciji in izvajanju zdravstvenega varstva in zdravniške oskrbe ter ugodnosti socialne varnosti zlasti v primeru bolezni.
(8) This directive aims to establish a general framework for provision of safe, high quality and efficient cross-border healthcare in the Community , to ensure patients mobility and freedom to provide healthcare and high level of protection of health and to facilitate the provision of cross-border healthcare , whilst fully respecting the responsibilities of the Member States for the definition of social security benefits related to health and the organisation and delivery of healthcare and medical care and social security benefits in particular for sickness.
Zakonodaja o izvajanju pacientovih pravic do čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva mora jasno priznati koristi čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v nekaterih okoliščinah.
Legislation which aims to address the application of patients' rights to cross-border healthcare should be clear in recognising the benefits, in certain circumstances, of cross-border healthcare.
To zlasti velja za področje redkih bolezni, za katere v posamezni državi članici kakovostnega zdravljenja ni.
This is especially the case in the area of rare diseases, quality treatment for which may not be available within the boundaries of a particular member state.
(10) Za namene te direktive pojem „čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo“ zajema naslednje oblike storitev zdravstvenega varstva :
(10) For the purpose of this Directive, the concept of "cross-border healthcare" covers the following modes of supply of healthcare :
(10) Za namene te direktive pojem „čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo“ pomeni, da :
(10) For the purpose of this Directive, the concept of "cross-border healthcare" shall mean :
– uporaba zdravstvenega varstva v tujini (tj. pacient gre na zdravljenje k izvajalcu zdravstvenega varstva v drugi državi članici ) ; to je znano tudi kot „mobilnost pacientov“;
- Use of healthcare abroad (i.e.: a patient moving to a healthcare provider in another Member State for treatment); this is what is referred to as 'patient mobility';
– pacient fizično obišče izvajalca zdravstvenega varstva v državi članici , ki ni država njegovega zdravstvenega zavarovanja, z namenom, da tam uporablja zdravstvene storitve ; to je znano tudi kot „mobilnost pacientov“;
- The patient physically visits a healthcare provider in a Member State other than that where he has social security affiliation with the intention of seeking health services there; this is what is referred to as 'patient mobility';
– čezmejno zagotavljanje zdravstvenega varstva (tj. prenos storitve iz ozemlja ene države članice na ozemlje druge); kot so na primer storitve telemedicine, diagnosticiranje in zdravniški recept na daljavo , laboratorijske storitve;
- Cross-border provision of healthcare (i.e.: delivery of service from the territory of one Member State into the territory of another); such as telemedicine services, remote diagnosis and prescription , laboratory services;
– zdravstvena storitev virtualno ali drugače prečka meje: pacient ne gre fizično v drugo državo članico, a kljub temu uporablja zdravstvene storitve z ozemlja države članice , ki ni njegova država zdravstvenega zavarovanja, kot so telekirurgija, zdravstveno svetovanje, izdajanje receptov in laboratorijske storitve na daljavo ; to je znano tudi kot „telemedicina“;
- The health service itself crosses borders, virtually or otherwise: the patient does not physically go to another Member State but nonetheless receives health services from the territory of a Member State other than that where he has social security affiliation, such as telesurgery, a medical consultation, issuing of a prescription and remote laboratory services; this is what is referred to as 'telemedicine';
– trajna prisotnost izvajalca zdravstvenega varstva (tj. ustanovitev izvajalca zdravstvenega varstva v drugi državi članici) in
- Permanent presence of a healthcare provider (i.e.: establishment of a healthcare provider in another Member State); and,
– začasna prisotnost oseb (tj. mobilnost zdravstvenih delavcev, na primer začasen premik v državo članico pacienta zaradi izvajanja storitev).
- Temporary presence of persons (i.e.: mobility of health professionals, for example moving temporarily to the Member State of the patient to provide services) .
– začasna prisotnost oseb (tj. mobilnost zdravstvenih delavcev, na primer začasen premik v državo članico pacienta zaradi izvajanja storitev) ;
- Temporary presence of persons (i.e.: mobility of health professionals, for example moving temporarily to the Member State of the patient to provide services) ;