natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kar zadeva priporočene dnevne vnose in dejavnike pretvorbe za izračun energijske vrednosti in opredelitve, mora nova uredba upoštevati direktivo 2008/100 o označevanju hranilne vrednosti živil, objavljeno v uradnem listu 28. oktobra 2008.
The new regulation must take account of Directive 2008/100/EC on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs as regards recommended daily allowances, energy conversion factors and definitions, which was published in the Official Journal on 28 October 2008.
Poročevalec zato predlaga, da se tabela „Vitamini in minerali, ki se lahko navedejo, ter njihovi priporočeni dnevni vnosi (PDV)“, ki jo predlaga Komisija, nadomesti s tisto iz direktive 2008/100, da bi se upoštevala veljavna zakonodaja.
The rapporteur is thus suggesting that the table headed 'Vitamins and minerals which may be declared and their recommended daily allowances (RDAs)' proposed by the Commission should be replaced by that in Directive 2008/100/EC, for the sake of consistency in the legislation in force.
Priloga XI – del A – odstavek 2
Annex XI – Part A – paragraph 2
Pri določitvi znatne količine je praviloma treba upoštevati 15 % priporočenega vnosa, navedenega v točki 1, na 100 g ali 100 ml ali na paket, če ta vsebuje en sam obrok .
As a rule, 15 % of the recommended allowance specified in point 1 supplied by 100 g or 100 ml or per package if the package contains only a single portion should be taken into consideration in deciding what constitutes a significant amount.
15 % priporočenega dnevnega vnosa (RDA) na 100 g za trdna živila ali na paket, če ta vsebuje eno samo porcijo , ali
- 15 % of the recommended daily allowance (RDA) per 100 g for solids or per package if the package contains only a single portion , or
- 7,5 % RDA na 100 ml za tekoča živila ali
- 7.5% of RDA per 100 ml for liquids, or
- 5 % RDA na 100 kcal (12 % PDV 1 MJ) ali
- 5% of RDA per 100 kcal (12% of RDA 1 MJ), or
- količino, določeno na podlagi odstopanj v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 1925/2006.
- an amount provided for under derogations granted in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods should be taken into consideration in deciding what constitutes a significant amount.
Del B – Priporočeni vnosi energije in izbranih hranilnih snovi razen vitaminov in mineralov (odrasli)
Reference intakes for energy and selected nutrients other than vitamins and minerals (adults)
Priporočeni vnosi energije in izbranih hranilnih snovi razen vitaminov in mineralov (odrasli) 1
Reference intakes for energy and selected nutrients other than vitamins and minerals (adults) 1
1 Priporočeni vnosi energije so okvirni, natančneje pa jih bo določila Evropska agencija za varnost hrane.
1 The reference intakes are indicative values; they will be laid down more precisely by the European Food Safety Authority.
Priloga XI – del B – tabela – vrsta 3 a (novo)
Annex XI – Part B – table ‑ line 3 a (new)
Energijska vrednost ali hranilna snov
Energy or nutrient Reference Intake
Priloga XI – del B – tabela – vrsta 3 b (novo)
Annex XI – Part B – table ‑ line 3 b (new)
Priloga XI – del B – tabela – vrsta 3 c (novo)
Annex XI – Part B – table ‑ line 3 c (new)
Priloga XI – del B – tabela – vrsta 3 c (novo)
Annex XI – Part B – table ‑ line 3 d (new)
Priloga XIII – del A – tabela – vrsta 1
Annex XIII – part A – table – row 1
– energijska vrednost kJ in kcal
- energy kJ and kcal
– energijska vrednost kcal
- energy kcal
o pristojnosti zakonodajnega pooblastila
on the power of legislative delegation
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................18
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 18
– ob upoštevanju člena 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
– having regard to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. maja 2009 o novi vlogi in pristojnostih Parlamenta pri izvajanju Lizbonske pogodbe
– having regard to its resolution of 7 May 2009 on Parliament's new role and responsibilities in implementing the Treaty of Lisbon
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0373 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0373 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 24. novembra 2009 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prilagoditvi nekaterih aktov, za katere se uporablja postopek iz člena 251 Pogodbe, Sklepu Sveta 1999/468/ES glede regulativnega postopka s pregledom – Prilagoditev regulativnemu postopku s pregledom – Peti del
– having regard to its position of 24 November 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny – Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny – Part Five
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0083 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0083 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o izvajanju člena 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( KOM(2009)0673 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 9 December 2009 on the implementation of Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( COM(2009)0673 ),
– ob upoštevanju pisma z dne 29. januarja 2010, ki ga je predsednik Evropskega parlamenta poslal predsedniku Evropske komisije v zvezi s členoma 290 in 291 PDEU,
– having regard to the letter of 29 January 2010 from the President of the European Parliament to the President of the European Commission on Articles 290 and 291 TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7–0110/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7‑0110/2010 ),
A. ker Lizbonska pogodba potrjuje zakonodajno pooblastilo in v pravni red Unije uvaja hierarhijo predpisov, s čimer je okrepljen demokratični značaj Unije in racionaliziran njen pravni red; ker Lizbonska pogodba uvaja nov koncept zakonodajnega akta z daljnosežnimi posledicami,
A. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon consecrates legislative power and introduces a hierarchy of norms in the Union's legal order, thus reinforcing the democratic character of the Union and rationalising its legal order; whereas the Treaty of Lisbon introduces the novel concept of a legislative act, with far-reaching consequences,
B. ker zakonodajno pooblastilo, kot ga določa člen 290 PDEU, dopušča možnost, da zakonodajalec del svojih pooblastil v zakonodajnem aktu (v nadaljevanju „temeljni akt”) prenese na Komisijo;
B. whereas one of the elements of legislative power is the possibility, provided for in Article 290 TFEU, for the Legislator to delegate part of its own power to the Commission in a legislative act (hereinafter ‘the basic act’),
C. ker je prenos pooblastila zahtevno dejanje, pri katerem dobi Komisija nalogo, da izvrši pooblastilo, ki je lastno vlogi zakonodajalca; ker mora zato biti izhodišče pri tehtanju vprašanja o prenosu vedno svoboda zakonodajalca;
C. whereas delegation is a delicate operation in which the Commission is instructed to exercise a power which is intrinsic to the Legislator’s own role; whereas the starting-point in examining the issue of delegation must therefore always be the freedom of the Legislator,
D. ker se lahko pooblastilo prenese le za dopolnitev ali spremembo delov zakonodajnega akta, ki jih zakonodajalec ocenjuje kot nebistvene; ker bodo delegirani akti, ki jih bo na tej osnovi sprejela Komisija, nezakonodajni akti splošnega obsega; ker mora temeljni akt izrecno opredeljevati cilje, vsebino, področje uporabe in trajanje prenosa pooblastila, pa tudi določati pogoje tega prenosa,
D. whereas this delegated power can only consist in supplementing or amending parts of a legislative act which the Legislator does not consider to be essential; whereas the resulting delegated acts adopted by the Commission will be non-legislative acts of general scope; whereas the basic act must explicitly define the objective, content, scope and duration of that delegation, and must lay down the conditions to which the delegation is subject,
E. ker bodo delegirani akti pomembno vplivali na številna področja; ker je zato zlasti v zvezi z delegiranimi akti nadvse pomembno, da se jih razvije in o njih odloča na povsem pregleden način, ki sozakonodajalcema dejansko omogoča, da demokratično nadzirata Komisiji dodeljena pooblastila, vključno z javno razpravo v Parlamentu, kadar je to potrebno;
E. whereas delegated acts will have important implications in many areas; whereas it is therefore of paramount importance, in particular with regard to delegated acts, that they are developed and decided upon in a fully transparent manner which effectively enables the co-legislators to democratically control the exercise of the power delegated to the Commission, including by public debate in Parliament, where necessary,
F. ker bi moral biti Parlament Svetu enakopraven glede vseh vidikov pristojnosti zakonodajnega pooblastila,
F. whereas Parliament should be on an equal footing with the Council with respect to all aspects of the power of legislative delegation,
G. ker je Lamfalussyjev postopek utrl pot sedanjemu mehanizmu prenosa pooblastila s popolnim nadzorom zakonodajalca; ker izjava št. 39 konference predstavnikov vlad držav članic s 23. julija 2007, priložena Lizbonski pogodbi, priznava specifično naravo področja finančnih storitev; ker novi režim za delegirane akte nikakor ne sme spodkopati obstoječih pravic Parlamenta na tem področju, še posebej kar zadeva zgodnje posredovanje dokumentov in informacij,
G. whereas the ‘Lamfalussy procedure’ paved the way for the present mechanism of delegation with full control by the Legislator; whereas Declaration 39 of the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 23 July 2007, annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon, recognised the specific nature of the financial services area; whereas the new regime for delegated acts cannot in any way undermine Parliament’s existing rights in that area, especially concerning the early transmission of documents and information ,
H. ker je treba na prenos pooblastil gledati kot na orodje za boljšo pripravo zakonodaje, katere cilj je, da bi bila zakonodaja preprosta ter bi jo bilo mogoče dopolniti in posodobiti brez ponovnih zakonodajnih postopkov, pri čemer pa zakonodajalec vseeno ohrani končno pristojnost in odgovornost,
H. whereas delegation can be seen as a tool for better law-making, the objective of which is to ensure that legislation can at the same time remain simple and be completed and updated without needing to have recourse to repeated legislative procedures, whilst also allowing the Legislator to maintain its ultimate power and responsibility,
I. ker člen 290 PDEU, v nasprotju s pristopom iz člena 291 PDEU o izvedbenih ukrepih, ne vsebuje pravne podlage za sprejetje horizontalnega akta, ki bi določal pravila in splošna načela za prenos pooblastila; ker je zato treba ta pravila opredeliti v vsakem temeljnem aktu posebej,
I. whereas, by contrast with the approach taken in Article 291 TFEU concerning implementing measures, Article 290 TFEU does not contain a legal basis for the adoption of a horizontal act setting out the rules and general principles applicable to delegations of power; whereas those conditions must therefore be set out in each basic act,
J. ker je Komisija odgovorna Parlamentu; ker se je komisar, pristojen za medinstitucionalne odnose in administrativne zadeve, v svoji predstavitvi pred Odborom za ustavne zadeve 18. januarja 2010 zavezal k tesnemu sodelovanju s Parlamentom in bi Komisija na ta način prenesena pooblastila izvrševala v skladu z željami Parlamenta;
J. whereas the Commission is accountable to Parliament; whereas the Commissioner responsible for inter-institutional relations and administration made a commitment, at his hearing before the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on 18 January 2010, to work very closely with Parliament to ensure that the Commission's exercise of delegated power was to Parliament’s satisfaction,
1. meni, da je treba cilje, vsebino, področje uporabe in trajanje prenosa v skladu s členom 290 PDEU izrecno in natančno opredeliti v vsakem temeljnem aktu;
Considers that the objectives, content, scope and duration of a delegation pursuant to Article 290 TFEU must be expressly and meticulously defined in each basic act;
4. meni, da morajo nadzorni mehanizmi, ki jih določi zakonodajalec, spoštovati nekatera splošna načela prava Unije in da morajo še zlasti:
Is of the opinion that the control mechanisms set out by the Legislator must respect certain general principles of Union law and that, in particular, they must:
- biti preprosti in lahko razumljivi,
- be simple and easily understandable,
- zagotavljati pravno varnost,
- safeguard legal certainty,
- Komisiji omogočati učinkovito izvajanje prenesenega pooblastila in
- enable the Commission to exercise the delegated power effectively, and
6. meni, da bi moral biti nujni postopek s skrajšanim rokom za ugovor iz temeljnega akta predviden le za zelo izjemne primere, povezane na primer z varnostnimi vprašanji ali humanitarnimi krizami;
Considers that an urgency procedure with a shorter period for objection provided for in the basic act itself should be reserved for particularly exceptional cases, for example relating to security matters or humanitarian crises;
9. močno nasprotuje temu, da bi v temeljne akte poleg določb, ki jih že vsebuje člen 290 PDEU, vključili še določbe o dodatnih obveznostih zakonodajalca;
Strongly rejects the insertion in basic acts of provisions imposing on the Legislator additional obligations over and above those already contained in Article 290 TFEU;
Praktični predpisi
Practical arrangements
- posvetovanje pri pripravi in oblikovanju delegiranih aktov,
- consultations in the preparation and drawing-up of delegated acts,
- izmenjavo informacij, še zlasti v primeru preklica,
- mutual exchanges of information, in particular in the event of a revocation,
- postopke za posredovanje dokumentov,
- arrangements for the transmission of documents,
- minimalne roke za ugovor Parlamenta in Sveta,
- minimum periods for objection by Parliament and the Council;
- računanje rokov,
- computation of time periods,
- objavo aktov v Uradnem listu na različnih stopnjah postopka;
- the publication of acts in the Official Journal at different stages in the procedure;
– zagotoviti zgodnje in stalno posredovanje informacij in dokumentov pristojnim odborom Parlamenta, vključno z osnutki delegiranih aktov in prejetimi prispevki; v ta namen bi se komitološki register lahko uporabljal kot model za boljši digitalni informacijski sistem;
– ensure an early and continuous transmission of information and relevant documents to Parliament's relevant committees, including successive drafts of delegated acts and any contributions received; to this end, the current comitology register could be used as a model for an improved digital information system,
– omogočiti udeležbo Parlamenta na pripravljalnih sestankih, izmenjavah mnenj in posvetovanjih;
– give Parliament access to related preparatory meetings, exchanges of views and consultations;
13. predlaga, naj se minimalni rok za ugovor določi v prihodnjem skupnem dogovoru, česar se ne sme razumeti kot omejevanje, temveč le kot minimum, brez katerega bi demokratični nadzor Parlamenta postal neučinkovit; meni, da bi moral biti rok, v katerem se lahko aktu nasprotuje, najmanj dva meseca z možnostjo podaljšanja za nadaljnja dva meseca na pobudo Parlamenta ali Sveta; opozarja, da se daljši rok za ugovor lahko določi v skladu z naravo delegiranih aktov;
Proposes that a minimum period for objection be fixed in any future Common Understanding, it being made clear that this should be understood not as a straitjacket but merely as a minimum below which Parliament’s democratic control would become nugatory; considers that the minimum period for objection should be two months, with a possibility of its being extended by a further two months at the initiative of Parliament or the Council; recalls that a longer period for objection can be set depending on the nature of the delegated act;
15. poudarja, da je pri sklepanju vsakršnega skupnega dogovora treba upoštevati, da so lahko delegirani akti, pri katerih se lahko uveljavlja pravica do ugovora, objavljeni le v Uradnem listu in da začnejo veljati po izteku roka za ugovor, razen v primeru zgodnjega neugovora; meni, da je izrecna obveznost, po kateri morata Parlament in Svet v vsakem temeljnem aktu objaviti sprejete odločitve o nadzoru nad Komisijo pri njenem izvajanju prenesenega pooblastila, odvečna;
Stresses, in the context of any future Common Understanding, that delegated acts subject to a right of objection can only be published in the Official Journal and thus enter into force after the expiry of the period for objection, except where an early non-objection is granted; considers that an express obligation requiring Parliament and the Council in each basic act to publish decisions taken in controlling the Commission’s exercise of delegated power is superfluous;
17. naloži upravi Parlamenta, naj s (proračunsko nevtralno) prerazporeditvijo zagotovi sredstva za potrebna nova delovna mesta za ustrezno podporo pri nalogah, ki izhajajo iz člena 290 PDEU; poziva k institucionalnemu pristopu do ocenjevanja upravnih struktur in človeških virov, ki so na voljo za razvoj dodeljenih pooblastil;
Requires Parliament's administration to reallocate resources as a (budget-neutral) means of providing the posts needed to deliver appropriate support for the performance of tasks connected with Article 290 TFEU; calls for an institutional approach to assess the administrative structures and human resources available to develop delegated competences;
19. vztraja, naj bo najpomembnejša prednostna naloga prilagoditev pravnega reda Unije na tistih področjih politike, kjer se pred uveljavitvijo Lizbonske pogodbe ni uporabljal postopek soodločanja; poziva, naj se ta področja obravnavajo od primera do primera in se zagotovi, da se zlasti vsi ukrepi splošnega obsega, ki so se do zdaj sprejemali v skladu s členoma 4 in 5 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil
Insists that the first priority must be to adapt the acquis in policy areas which, prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, were not subject to the codecision procedure; calls for them to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis to ensure that, in particular, all appropriate measures of general scope which were previously adopted under Articles 4 and 5 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission
20. meni, da je treba za celovito ohranitev pristojnosti zakonodajalca posebno pozornost nameniti ustrezni uporabi členov 290 in 291 PDEU ter praktičnim posledicam sklicevanja na en ali drug člen, pa naj bo to med zgoraj omenjeno prilagoditvijo ali pri obravnavi predlogov po rednem zakonodajnem postopku; vztraja, da morata biti sozakonodajalca pristojna za to, da odločita, ali naj se zadeve, ki so bile že sprejete v regulativnem postopku s pregledom (RPP), sprejmejo v skladu s členom 290 PDEU ali po rednem zakonodajnem postopku;
Considers that in order to fully preserve the Legislator's prerogatives, special attention should be given to the relative use of Articles 290 and 291 TFEU and to the practical consequences of having recourse to one article or the other, be it during the above-mentioned alignment or when dealing with proposals under the ordinary legislative procedure; insists that the co-legislators have the power to decide that the matters previously adopted under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS) can be adopted either under Article 290 TFEU or under the ordinary legislative procedure;
Nov koncept zakonodajnega akta
The novel concept of a "legislative" act
Lizbonska pogodba potrjuje zakonodajno pristojnost in v pravni red Unije uvaja hierarhijo predpisov .
The Treaty of Lisbon consecrates legislative power and introduces a hierarchy of norms in the Union 's legal order .
S tem je okrepljen demokratični značaj Unije in racionaliziran njen pravni red.
In so doing, it reinforces the democratic character of the Union and rationalises its legal order.
Nova pogodba uvaja koncept zakonodajnega akta, ki ga doslej v pravu Skupnosti in Unije ni bilo
The new treaty introduces the concept of a legislative act which was until now unknown in Community and Union law
Razlikuje med zakonodajnimi in vsemi drugimi akti (nezakonodajnimi akti), kar ima daljnosežne posledice, pri tem pa je zakonodajni akt opredeljen kot pravni akt, sprejet po zakonodajnem postopku
A distinction with far-reaching consequences is made between legislative acts and all other acts (non-legislative acts), a legislative act being defined as a legal act adopted by legislative procedure
Člen 289(3) PDEU. .
Article 289(3) TFEU. .
Pravno podlago za to, ali je akt zakonodajne narave ali ne, opredeljujeta pogodbi.
Each individual legal basis in the Treaties identifies whether or not an act is of a legislative nature.
Prenos pooblastila z zakonodajalca na Komisijo
Delegation of power by the Legislator to the Commission
Eden od elementov zakonodajne pristojnosti po členu 290 PDEU je možnost, da zakonodajalec del svojih pooblastil v temeljnem zakonodajnem aktu (v nadaljevanju „temeljni akt”) prenese na Komisijo.
One of the elements of legislative power is the possibility, provided for in Article 290 TFEU, for the Legislator to delegate part of its own power to the Commission in a basic legislative act (hereinafter "the basic act").
Pooblastilo se lahko prenese le za dopolnitev ali spremembo delov zakonodajnega akta, ki jih zakonodajalec ocenjuje kot nebistvene.
This delegated power can only consist in supplementing or amending parts of a legislative act which the Legislator does not consider to be essential.
Delegirani akti, ki jih na tej osnovi sprejme Komisija, so nezakonodajni akti splošnega obsega.
The resulting delegated acts adopted by the Commission will be non-legislative acts of general scope.
Za veljaven prenos mora zakonodajalec izrecno opredeliti cilje, vsebino, področje uporabe in trajanje prenosa pooblastila
In order to make a valid delegation, the Legislator must explicitly define the objective, content, scope and duration of that delegation
Člen 290(1), drugi pododstavek, PDEU. .
Article 290(1) second subparagraph TFEU. .
Opredeliti mora tudi pogoje, ki jih mora prenos izpolnjevati
Furthermore, the Legislator must lay down the conditions to which this delegation is subject
Člen 290(2) PDEU. , kar bo zakonodajalcu omogočilo nadzor nad Komisijo pri njeni uporabi prenesenega pooblastila.
Article 290(2) TFEU. - this will allow the Legislator to control the Commission's use of delegated power.
Cilj prenosa pooblastila zakonodajalca
Objective of a delegation of power by the Legislator
Cilj prenosa pooblastila zakonodajalca je zagotoviti, da bi bila zakonodaja preprosta ter bi jo bilo mogoče dopolniti in posodobiti, ne da bi se bilo treba zateči k ponovnim zakonodajnim postopkom, kar bi povzročalo nesorazmerno veliko dela in bi vzelo preveč časa.
The objective of a delegation of power by the Legislator is to ensure that legislation can at the same time remain simple and also be completed and updated without needing to have recourse to repeated legislative procedures, which could be disproportionately cumbersome and take up an inordinate amount of time.
Prenos pooblastila torej omogoča obravnavo bolj podrobnih vidikov določenega dela zakonodaje Unije, pri čemer pa zakonodajalec še vedno ohranja končno pristojnost in odgovornost.
Delegation therefore provides a way to deal with the more detailed aspects of a piece of Union legislation while allowing the Legislator to maintain its ultimate power and responsibility.