natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vendar pa je za okrepitev obveščanja več možnosti in objavljanje zapisnikov je le ena izmed njih.
However, there are several options to enhance communication; the publication of minutes is just one of several possibilities.
Za odbor za denarno politiko centralne banke Bank of England, ki prakticira individualno odgovornost, je objava zapisnikov sestankov o politiki povsem razumljiva izbira.
For the Bank of England’s MPC, which applies individual accountability, it makes perfectly sense to publish minutes of policy meetings.
Fed k objavi zapisnikov zavezuje formalna zahteva, vendar pa ni nujno, da objavljeni zabeleženi glasovi v celoti odražajo raznolikost stališč v notranjih razpravah odbora za odprti trg Ameriške centralne banke; Fed za obveščanje o slednjih uporablja druga orodja.
In the case of the Fed there is a formal requirement to publish minutes, but the published voting records may not fully reflect the diversity of views in the internal deliberations of the FOMC; to communicate the latter, the Fed has used other tools.
Kot sem omenil v odgovoru na prejšnje vprašanje, morajo biti razprave sveta ECB tajne, kar slednjemu omogoča, da odločitve na področju denarne politike sprejema popolnoma neodvisno in na način, ki izpostavlja kolektivno odgovornost.
As I mentioned in my previous answer, the ECB is required to keep the deliberations of the Governing Council confidential and this allows the Governing Council to make monetary policy decisions in full independence and with a view to emphasising its collective accountability.
Za zagotavljanje informacij, ki jih lahko primerjamo z zapisniki drugih omenjenih centralnih bank, pa ECB porablja druga komunikacijska orodja.
However, the ECB uses other communication tools which provide information that can be compared to minutes of the other central banks mentioned.
Predsednikova uvodna izjava, objavljena na tiskovni konferenci, na primer, zagotavlja celovit povzetek ocene gospodarskih gibanj, pomembnih za politiko.
Notably, the President’s Introductory Statement at the press conference provides a comprehensive summary of the policy-relevant assessment of economic developments.
To je ocena, narejena po kolektivno dogovorjenih smernicah sveta ECB.
It is an assessment along the lines that have been collectively agreed by the Governing Council.
Te informacije so javnosti posredovane skoraj v realnem času.
This information is provided almost in real-time.
Poleg tega mesečna tiskovna konferenca vključuje del z vprašanji in odgovori, ki ponuja priložnost za sprotno in nepristransko razlago odločitev glede denarne politike javnosti.
Moreover, the monthly press conference includes a question and answer session which provides a platform for a timely and even-handed explanation of monetary policy decisions to the public.
Menim, da uspešnost prakse organizacije tiskovnih konferenc ECB za obširnejše obveščanje javnosti in medijev o sprejetih odločitvah jasno dokazuje dejstvo, da so jo prevzele tudi druge centralne banke, med njimi Bank of England in pred kratkim (aprila letos) tudi Fed.
I believe the success of the ECB’s practice to give press conferences, to provide the public and the media with more extensive information on the decisions, is clearly shown by the fact that it has been followed by other central banks, notably the Bank of England and most recently (since last April) the Fed.
Kaj menite o monetarnem dialogu z Evropskim parlamentom?
What’s your opinion of the monetary dialogue with the European Parliament?
Ali bi lahko člani sveta ECB razpravljali o denarni politiki in o svojih sklepih z drugimi političnimi akterji ali bi to ogrožalo neodvisnost banke?
Might ECB board members discuss monetary policy and its decisions with other political actors or would this harm the bank’s independence?
Predsednik ECB štirikrat letno nastopi pred Odborom za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve Evropskega parlamenta.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament holds hearings of the ECB President on a quarterly basis.
Ta redna srečanja dopolnjujejo neodvisnost ECB in so osrednjega pomena za izpolnjevanje njene demokratične odgovornosti.
This regular interaction is complementary to the ECB’s independence and is fundamental to the discharging of the ECB’s democratic accountability.
Za ECB je to zelo pomembna priložnost, da svoje politike predstavi neposredno izvoljenim predstavnikom evropskih državljanov.
It provides a very important occasion for the ECB to explain its policies to the directly elected representatives of the European citizens.
Ta okvir rednih srečanj je omogočil celovito in plodno sodelovanje obeh institucij ter pripomogel k boljšemu razumevanju politik ECB po celi Evropi.
This framework of regular hearings has allowed for a thorough and fruitful interaction between the two institutions and has helped to increase the understanding of the ECB’s policies throughout Europe.
Dobro je uveljavljen tudi institucionalni okvir za odnose ECB z drugimi institucijami in forumi EU.
The institutional framework pertaining to the ECB’s relations with other EU institutions and fora is also well established.
Sedanji okvir omogoča učinkovito sodelovanje med različnimi oblikovalci politike, kot so, na primer, tisti znotraj Euroskupine in sveta ECOFIN, ali, na nižji ravni, v Ekonomsko-finančnem odboru in Odboru za ekonomsko politiko EU.
The current framework allows for an effective interaction between the various policy makers as, for example, within the Eurogroup and ECOFIN Council, or at lower level in the Economic and Financial Committee and the Economic Policy Committee of the EU.
Poleg tega ta sodelovanja potekajo na podlagi določb Pogodbe in ob polnem spoštovanju naloge in neodvisnosti ECB.
Also this interaction takes place on the basis of the Treaty provisions and in full respect of the ECB’s mandate and independence.
Naj se na tem mestu omejim na tri poglavitne izzive in tveganja, s katerimi se sooča ECB:
As regards the main challenges and risks facing the ECB, let me restrict myself here to three of them:
kar zadeva denarno politiko, sta med velikimi izzivi prav gotovo uglasitev odprave še vedno zelo ekspanzivne naravnanosti denarne politike in postopna opustitev preostalih nestandardnih ukrepov.
As regards monetary policy, to fine tune the exit from the still very accommodative monetary policy stance and the phasing-out of the remaining non-standard measures is certainly a great challenge.
Standardna denarna politika (tj. določanje vodilnih obrestnih mer) bi kot vedno morala biti usklajena s ciljem izpolnjevanja naloge ECB, ki je srednjeročno ohranjanje stabilnosti cen v celotnem evroobmočju; nestandardne ukrepe je treba postopno odpraviti, tako da ne bodo več potrebni za podpiranje delovanja prenosa denarne politike v gospodarstvo, končno pa tudi na cene.
Standard monetary policy (i.e. the setting of our policy rates) should be adjusted as always with the aim to deliver on the ECB’s mandate, i.e. to maintain price stability for the euro area as a whole in the medium term; non-standard measures need to be phased out to the extent that they are no longer needed to support the functioning of the transmission of monetary policy to the economy and, ultimately, prices.
Zaradi nenehno visoke stopnje negotovosti v makroekonomskem in finančnem okolju, pa tudi preostale ranljivosti, je potrebna natančna ocena celotne situacije in obetov.
The continued high degree of uncertainty on the macroeconomic and financial environment together with remaining vulnerabilities requires a careful assessment of the overall situation and outlook.
Slednja nato zagotavlja postopno spreminjanje standardne in nestandardne denarne politike.
This in turn warrants an element of gradualism in changing standard and non-standard monetary policy.
Drugi izziv, ki bi ga želel izpostaviti, se nanaša na finančno stabilnost.
Another challenge I would like to highlight relates to financial stability.
Finančna kriza je sprožila veliko vprašanj glede odnosa med denarno politiko in finančno stabilnostjo, obenem pa je prinesla spoznanje, da med ciljem stabilnosti cen in podporo, ki jo ECB lahko nudi na drugih področjih, kot je finančna stabilnost, ni kompromisa.
The financial crisis has raised a number of questions on the relation between monetary policy and financial stability, while emphasizing that there is no trade-off between the objective of price stability and the support that the ECB can lend to other areas, such as financial stability.
V tem pogledu je predvsem pomembno boljše razumevanje vloge finančnega sektorja v mehanizmu prenosa.
A better understanding of the role of the financial sector in the transmission mechanism is of the essence in this respect.
Na koncu naj omenim še Evropo samo.
Finally, let me mention Europe itself.
Kriza državnega dolga je pravi preizkus evropske politične volje, da se stori vse potrebno za dosego gospodarske in monetarne povezanosti v Evropi.
The sovereign debt crisis is a real test for the political will in Europe to do whatever is needed to ensure the achievements of economic and monetary integration in Europe.
V tem smislu je slednja tudi pravi preizkus trdnosti evropskih in nacionalnih institucij.
In this sense, it is also a real test for the solidity of European and national institutions.
Potrebno je odločno ukrepanje, zlasti vlad držav, ki jih je kriza državnega dolga prizadela, za ponovno pridobitev zaupanja ter preprečitev širjenja škodljivega vpliva.
Decisive action is needed, especially from the governments of the countries affected by the sovereign debt crisis, to regain confidence and avoid contagion.
V prihodnje bi bilo treba ustanoviti institucije, ki bodo preprečile ponoven pojav takih neravnovesij, oziroma jih bodo v primeru, če se slednja kljub temu ponovijo, znale učinkovito odpraviti.
Looking forward, institutions should be put in place that avoid the renewed build-up of imbalances, and - should they nevertheless re-appear - can resolve them effectively.
To zahteva vse večjo evropsko usmerjenost nacionalnega razvoja.
This requires placing national developments increasingly in a European context.
Davčne politike, strukturne reforme in finančni nadzor morajo v celoti spoštovati evropsko razsežnost, še zlasti razsežnost evroobmočja. .
Fiscal policies, structural reforms and financial supervision should fully respect the European dimension, and particularly the euro area dimension.
Evropske države lahko vse prednosti svojega članstva v ekonomski in monetarni uniji izkoristijo le s političnimi ukrepi, ki so v skladu s strožjimi evropskimi zahtevami.
Only by policy actions in line with strengthened European requirements can countries in Europe fully realise all benefits of being part of economic and monetary union.
To pa ni velik izziv le zame kot prepričanega Evropejca, temveč tudi za denarno politiko ECB, saj slednja vpliva na okolje, v katerem ECB deluje.
This formidable challenge not only matters to me as a dedicated European, but it also relevant for the ECB’s monetary policy as it affects the environment in which the ECB operates
Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Huntis(Nikolaos Chountis), George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Diogo Feio, Elisa Ferreira, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Wolf Klinz, Jürgen Klute, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Arlene McCarthy, Ivari Padar, Alfredo Pallone, Ani Podimata (Anni Podimata), Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Edward Scicluna, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Chountis, George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Diogo Feio, Elisa Ferreira, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Wolf Klinz, Jürgen Klute, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Arlene McCarthy, Ivari Padar, Alfredo Pallone, Anni Podimata, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Edward Scicluna, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .........................................................................20
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................19
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor .............................................................28
OPINION of the Committee on Budgetary Control ........................................27
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................31
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............30
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................34
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............33
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................43
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................42
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................46
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...45
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 50
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 49
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve ........................................................................54
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ................................53
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................57
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...56
PRILOGA: PISMO ODBORA ZA RIBIŠTVO.........................................................................61
ANNEX: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES...................................................60
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................63
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................62
o pooblastilu za trialog o predlogu proračuna za leto 2012
on the mandate for the trilogue on the 2012 Draft Budget
– ob upoštevanju predloga proračuna za proračunsko leto 2012, ki ga je Komisija sprejela 20. aprila 2011 ( SEC(2011)0498 ),
– having regard to the draft budget for the financial year 2012, which the Commission adopted on 20 April 2011 ( SEC(2011)0498 ),
– ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA)
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2011 o splošnih smernicah za pripravo proračuna za leto 2012
– having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2011 on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2012 budget
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0114 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0114 . ,
– ob upoštevanju naslova II poglavja 7 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Title II, Chapter 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za ribištvo,
– having regard to the letter of the Committee on Fisheries,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za proračunski nadzor, Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za regionalni razvoj, Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, Odbora za ustavne zadeve in Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A7-0230/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Development, the Committee on Budgetary Control, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A7-0230/2011 ),
A. ker je proračunski postopek za leto 2012 drugi postopek, ki bo potekal v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo, in bo tako mogoče upoštevati pomembne izkušnje iz preteklega leta,
A. whereas the 2012 budgetary procedure is the second procedure carried out on the basis of the Treaty of Lisbon, and important lessons can be drawn from last year’s experience,
B. ker bi moral trialog, ki bo potekal julija, predstavnikom obeh vej proračunskega organa omogočiti, da razpravljajo o prednostnih nalogah, ki so jih opredelili za proračun za leto 2012, in da po možnosti dosežejo dogovor, ki se bo lahko upošteval pri obravnavi proračuna,
B. whereas the trilogue which will be held in July should enable the representatives of the two arms of the budgetary authority to discuss the priorities they have identified with regard to the annual budget 2012 and possibly find common ground that could be taken into account in their respective readings,
C. ker sta se poljsko in madžarsko predsedstvo javno zavezala odprtemu, konstruktivnemu političnemu dialogu o proračunskih zadevah z Evropskim parlamentom,
C. whereas the Polish and Hungarian presidencies have made public commitments to entering into an open, constructive and political dialogue with the EP on budgetary matters,
D. ker se zato pričakuje, da bo Svet ravnal kot zaupanja vreden politični partner skozi celoten postopek ter se bo odrekel samovoljnemu ali povsem aritmetičnemu zmanjševanju sredstev v vseh proračunskih vrsticah,
D. whereas the Council as a whole is therefore expected to act as a trustworthy political partner throughout the procedure, avoiding making arbitrary or purely arithmetical cuts across the budget lines,
Predlog proračuna za leto 2012 – splošna ocena
Draft Budget 2012 – general assessment
2. ponavlja, da je spodbujanje pametnega, trajnostnega in vključujočega gospodarstva, ki z uresničevanjem sedmih vodilnih pobud strategije Evropa 2020 ustvarja delovna mesta in kakovostne zaposlitve cilj, ki ga je soglasno potrdilo vseh 27 držav članic in institucij EU; opozarja, da bo uresničevanje te strategije zahtevalo ogromne v prihodnost usmerjene naložbe do leta 2020, katerih vrednost je Komisija v sporočilu o pregledu proračuna ocenila na nič manj kot 1.800 milijard EUR
Recalls that the promotion of a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy, which creates jobs and high-quality employment by delivering on the Europe 2020 strategy’s seven flagship initiatives is a jointly endorsed goal of the 27 Member States and the EU institutions; recalls that the implementation of this strategy will require a huge amount of future-oriented investment up to 2020, estimated at no less than EUR 1 800 billion by the Commission in its communication entitled ‘The EU Budget Review’
KOM(2010)0700 . ; zato poudarja, da ne kaže odlašati z nujnimi naložbami v izobraževanje na ravni EU in na ravni držav članic, da bi izboljšali raven izobrazbe, spodbujali socialno vključenost, predvsem z zmanjševanjem revščine, ter razvili na znanju temelječo družbo, ki bi slonela na znanstveni in tehnološki zmogljivosti celotne EU; v zvezi s tem vztraja pri tem, da je treba podpirati raziskave, razvoj, inovacije, mala in srednja podjetja ter razvoj novih tehnologij z učinkovito porabo virov;
COM(2010)0700 . ; underlines, therefore, that necessary investments - at both EU and Member State level - must be made now and delayed no longer, to improve education levels, foster social inclusion, in particular through the reduction of poverty, and the development of a knowledge-based society rooted in the overall EU scientific and technological capacity; in this context, insists on the need to support research, development, innovation and SMEs and the development of resource-efficient technologies;
4. opozarja, da strategija EU 2020 in evropski semester potrebujeta močno parlamentarno razsežnost, in je trdno prepričan, da bi večje sodelovanje Parlamenta znatno izboljšalo demokratični značaj in preglednost takšne naloge;
Recalls that EU 2020 strategy and the European Semester need a strong parliamentary dimension, and shows its firm conviction that stronger parliamentary involvement would significantly improve the democratic nature and transparency of such an exercise;
8. poudarja dejstvo, da so predlagani zneski za letni proračun EU za leto 2012 v skladu s profilom odhodkov EU, določenim v večletnem finančnem okviru 2007-2013, če se doseže sporazum proračunskega organa za revizijo večletnega finančnega okvira, ki bo upošteval dodatne finančne potrebe za program ITER; poudarja, da je treba zato vsako morebitno povečanje (ali zmanjšanje) v primerjavi s proračunom za leto 2011 oceniti ob upoštevanju učinka na izvajanje večletnih programov; poudarja, da je to vprašanje verodostojnosti institucij in nepretrganosti projekta EU, medtem ko se odgovornosti in zaveze EU še naprej povečujejo; glede na to meni, da je kot prednostno nalogo treba ciljnim političnim področjem dati pomemben in prepoznaven mehanizem financiranja za politike in nove pristojnosti na ravni EU;
Highlights the fact that the proposed figures in the 2012 EU annual budget are consistent with the profile of EU expenditure set in the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2007-2013, provided that an agreement of the budgetary authority can be found for a revision of the MFF, accommodating the additional financing needs of ITER; emphasises that any increase (or decrease) compared to Budget 2011 must therefore be assessed bearing in mind its impact on the delivery of the multiannual programmes; stresses that this is a question of institutional credibility and coherence of the EU project when EU responsibilities and commitments keep on growing; believes, from this point of view that endowing targeted policy areas and new competencies established at EU level with meaningful and visible financial capacity is a priority;
10. opominja, da se je prvi krog razprave o proračunskih prednostnih nalogah v Parlamentu že začel, in sicer se je glavni poročevalec za proračun za leto 2012 obširno posvetoval s specializiranimi parlamentarnimi odbori; poudarja, da je treba zdaj ta proces v odborih izpopolniti glede na njihova področja pristojnosti, da se opredelijo pozitivne in negativne prednostne naloge za proračun 2012;
Recalls that a first round of discussions on budgetary priorities has already started in Parliament in the form of the extensive consultation of its specialised committees by its general rapporteur for the Budget 2012; emphasises that the process must now be fine-tuned in each committee for its respective field of competence so as to identify the positive and negative priorities for the Budget 2012;
12. meni, da je treba tudi sredstva v proračunu EU za leto 2012, ki niso namenjena strategiji Evropa 2020, določiti na ustrezni ravni, da se zagotovi nadaljevanje politik EU in doseganje ciljev EU; še zlasti poudarja, da je treba EU omogočiti, da prevzame odgovornost na svetovnem prizorišču, zlasti glede na arabsko pomlad in nemire na Bližnjem vzhodu;
Takes the view that, besides the delivery of the EU 2020 strategy, appropriations in the EU 2012 Budget should be set at an appropriate level to ensure the continuation of EU policies and the achievement of EU objectives; underlines in particular the need to allow the EU to shoulder its global responsibility, especially in the wake of the Arab Spring and the unrest in the Middle East;