natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 z dne 27. junija 2005 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov,
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 19. maja 2008 o carinskih postopkih Skupnosti pri ponarejanju in piratstvu,
– having regard to the report of the Commission of 19 May 2008 on community customs activities on counterfeit and piracy,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 450/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2008 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti (modernizirani carinski zakonik)
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 450/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 laying down the Community Customs Code (Modernised Customs Code)
UL L 145, 04.06.2008, str.
OJ L 145, 4.6.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskih ukrepih za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine ( KOM(2006)0168 ),
– having regard to the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights ( COM(2006)0168 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. junija 2008 o štirideseti obletnici carinske unije
– having regard to its resolution of 19 June 2008 on the fortieth anniversary of the Customs Union
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0305 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0305 . ,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/48/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine
– having regard to Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1383/2003 z dne 22. julija 2003 o carinskem ukrepanju zoper blago, glede katerega obstaja sum, da krši določene pravice intelektualne lastnine, in o ukrepih, ki jih je treba sprejeti zoper blago, glede katerega je ugotovljeno, da je kršilo take pravice
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 of 22 July 2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be taken against goods found to have infringed such rights
UL L 196, 02.08.2003, str.
OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ter mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6‑0447/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0447/2008 ),
A. ker se je treba učinkovito boriti proti pojavu ponarejanja, če se želi doseči cilje iz obnovljene lizbonske agende, tako glede svojih notranjih kot zunanjih vidikov, ki so bili navedeni v sporočilu Komisije z dne 18. aprila 2007 z naslovom Globalna Evropa: Okrepljeno partnerstvo za olajšanje dostopa na trge evropskim izvoznikom ( KOM(2007)0183 ),
A. whereas it is necessary to combat counterfeiting effectively in order to achieve the objectives of the new Lisbon agenda, with regard to both its internal and external aspects, as stated by the Commission in its Communication of 18 April 2007 entitled ”Global Europe: a stronger partnership to deliver market access for European exporters” ( COM(2007)0183 ),
B. ker je Evropska unija drugi največji svetovni uvoznik blaga in storitev, in ker velika odprtost in preglednost njenega enotnega trga ponuja številne ugodnosti, vendar predstavlja tudi resna tveganja za vdor ponarejenih izdelkov,
B. whereas the European Union is the second world importer of goods and services and the extreme openness and transparency of its single market offers huge opportunities but also poses serious risks of an invasion of counterfeit products,
C. ker se je evropsko gospodarstvo specializiralo na področju visoko-kakovostnih izdelkov z visoko dodano vrednostjo, ki jih pogosto varujejo blagovne znamke, patenti ali geografske označbe, in so kot takšni zaradi svoje narave velikokrat predmet ponarejanja,
C. whereas the EU economy has specialised in high value added, high-quality products, often protected by trademarks, patents or geographic indications, which, by their very nature, are among the most likely to be counterfeited,
D. ker netarifne trgovinske ovire predstavljajo resne kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine, saj povzročajo, da je dostop na zunanje trge težaven in drag, zlasti za mala in srednje velika podjetja (MSP), ki imajo omejena sredstva in vire,
D. whereas serious infringements of intellectual property rights (IPR) are non-tariff trade barriers which make access to third-country markets more difficult and costly, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of limited resources and means,
E. ker je evropska konkurenčnost tradicionalno povezana s kakovostjo delovne sile, in v vedno večji meri, zlasti v primeru MSP, z raziskavo in razvojem, inovacijami in s pravicami intelektualne lastnine,
E. whereas European competitiveness is traditionally linked to the quality of the workforce and, increasingly, especially for SMEs, to research, development, innovation and the relevant IPRs,
F. ker pravice intelektualne lastnine, skupaj z geografskimi oznakami in označbami porekla, niso vedno učinkovito zaščitene s strani trgovinskih partnerjev Evropske unije,
F. whereas IPRs, including geographical indications and denominations of origin, are not always protected effectively by the European Union’s trading partners,
G. ker je število tipov ponarejenih izdelkov čedalje večje in ponaredki niso več omejeni zgolj na luksuzno in visoko-kakovostno blago, ampak vključujejo izdelke splošne uporabe, kot so igrače, zdravila, kozmetiko in hrano,
G. whereas there is a large and increasing number of types of counterfeit products, no longer confined to luxury and high-quality goods but also including commonly used products, such as toys, medicines, cosmetics and food,
H. ker je nedavna študija Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ocenila, da je mednarodna trgovina v povezavi s kršitvijo pravic intelektualne lastnine leta 2005 znašala 150 milijonov EUR, k tej vsoti pa je treba dodati še vrednost nacionalnih transakcij ter ponarejenega in piratskega blaga, prodanega na internetu,
H. whereas a recent survey by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) estimated that international trade relating to IPR infringements amounted to as much as EUR 150 billion in 2005, to which should be added the value of national transactions and counterfeit and pirated products that are distributed through the internet,
I. ker se je leta 2007 število primerov blaga, ki je kršilo pravice intelektualne lastnine, in ki so ga zaplenili carinski organi Evropske unije, povišalo za 17 % glede na preteklo leto, z 264-odstotnim povečanjem za kozmetiko in izdelke za osebno higieno, z 98 % za igrače in 51 % za zdravila,
I. whereas in 2007 the amount of goods seized by the customs authorities of the European Union that were in breach of IPRs increased by 17% against the previous year, with an increase of 264% for cosmetics and personal hygiene products, 98% for toys and 51% for medicines,
J. ker ima pojav ponarejanja in piratstva zaskrbljujoče posledice za gospodarstvo Evropske unije in za celoten socialno-gospodarski sistem Skupnosti, saj zmanjšuje spodbude za inovacijo, kar zavira neposredne tuje naložbe, industriji odteguje kvalificirana delovna mesta in polaga temelje za razvoj sive ekonomije, ki je vzporedna zakonitemu sistemu, in ki jo nadzoruje organiziran kriminal,
J. whereas counterfeiting and piracy has alarming consequences for the EU economy and for the Community social and economic system as a whole, reducing incentives to innovate, curbing foreign direct investment (FDI), eliminating skilled jobs from industry and laying the groundwork for the development of a hidden economic system, running parallel to the legal one and controlled by organised crime,
K. ker Organizacija za ekonomsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) v poročilu iz leta 2007 o gospodarskem vplivu ponarejanja in piratstva (The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy) ter v prihodnjem poročilu o drugi fazi glede piratstva digitalnih vsebin poudarja svetovne razsežnosti, hitro rast in škodljive gospodarske posledice digitalnega piratstva na imetnike pravic,
K. whereas the 2007 report by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) entitled ‘The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy’, and the upcoming Phase II report by the OECD on ‘Piracy of digital content’, emphasise the global scale, rapid growth and detrimental economic impact of digital piracy on rights holders,
L. ker ponarejanje povzroča resno okoljsko škodo, tako zaradi neprimernosti kakovostnih standardov za ponarejeno blago kot zaradi visokih stroškov za odstranjevanje in uničenje tega blaga,
L. whereas counterfeiting causes serious damage to the environment, both because of the inadequacy of the quality standards of counterfeit goods and the high costs of disposing of and destroying them,
M ker je, zlasti za MSP, dostop do postopkov za boj proti ponarejenemu blagu zapleten, drag in dolgotrajen,
M whereas access to procedures for combating counterfeit goods is complicated, costly and time-consuming, especially for SMEs,
N. ker enotni trg evropskemu potrošniku zagotavlja pravico, da na svoboden, pregleden in varen način izbere izdelke, ki jih želi kupiti, in ker lahko ponarejanje, če ni primerno zaustavljeno, škodi ne samo načelu zaupanja, na katerem temelji celoten sistem, ampak lahko poleg tega povzroči resna tveganja za varnost, zdravje in, v skrajnih primerih, za življenje samih potrošnikov, in ker je zato treba bolje zagotavljati njihove pravice,
N. whereas the single market ensures that European consumers can choose freely, transparently and safely which products to buy, and counterfeiting, unless appropriately curbed, can not only undermine the principle of confidence on which the entire system is based but can also pose serious risks to safety, health, and in extreme cases, the very lives of consumers and it is thus necessary to better protect their rights,
O. ker so pobude za dvig osveščenosti potrošnikov o tveganjih za njihovo zdravje in varnost ter na splošno o posledicah kupovanja ponarejenega blaga učinkovito orodje v boju proti ponarejenemu blagu,
O. whereas initiatives to raise awareness among consumers about risks to their health and safety and, in general, about the consequences of buying counterfeit goods are an effective tool in combating counterfeiting,
P. ker je treba sprejeti strožje ukrepe proti ponarejevalcem izdelkov, ki imajo neposreden vpliv na javno zdravje,
P. whereas more repressive action should be taken against counterfeiters of products that have a direct impact on public health,
Q. ker neprestana razhajanja med zakonodajami držav članic na področju pravic intelektualne lastnine, zlasti glede kazenskih ukrepov za njihovo spoštovanje, slabijo pogajalski položaj Evropske unije in lahko spodkopljejo dosedanja prizadevanja za učinkovitejšo zatiranje pojava na mednarodni ravni,
Q. whereas the ongoing differences between the laws of the Member States on IPRs, particularly with regard to the criminal measures aimed at ensuring that they are respected, weaken the European Union’s negotiating position and may undermine the efforts hitherto made to suppress counterfeiting more effectively internationally,
R. ker je poenostavljeni postopek iz člena 11 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1383/2003 z dne 21. julija 2003 o carinskem ukrepanju zoper blago, glede katerega obstaja sum, da krši določene pravice intelektualne lastnine, in o ukrepih, ki jih je treba sprejeti zoper blago, glede katerega je ugotovljeno, da je kršilo take pravice
R. whereas the simplified procedure laid down in Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1383/2003 of 21 July 2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be taken against goods found to have infringed such rights
S. ker so na vrhu v Sankt Petersburgu 2006 spoznali svetovno razsežnost težave v zvezi s ponarejanjem in piratstvom in poudarili, da je treba izboljšati sodelovanje med državami G8, tretjimi državami in pristojnimi mednarodnimi institucijami,
S. whereas the 2006 St Petersburg summit recognised the global nature of the counterfeiting and piracy problem and stressed the need to improve cooperation between G8 countries, third countries and the competent international institutions,
T. ker se je na kasnejšem vrhu držav G8 v Heiligendammu vzpostavila delovna skupina za pravice intelektualne lastnine za boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu kot del heiligendammskega procesa
T. whereas the subsequent G8 summit in Heiligendamm set up an IPR Task Force to combat counterfeiting and piracy as part of the ”Heiligendamm Process”
Deklaracija vrha o rasti in odgovornosti v svetovnem gospodarstvu 7. junija 2007, vrh G8 v Heiligendammu. ,
Summit Declaration, Growth and Responsibility in the World Economy, 7 June 2007, Summit G8 Heiligendamm. ,
U. ker so leta 2007 Evropska unija, Japonska in Združene države Amerike najavile začetek pogajanj zaradi novega večstranskega sporazuma, ki naj bi okrepil udejanjanje pravic intelektualne lastnine in zatiranje pojava ponarejanja in piratstva (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement – trgovinski sporazum proti ponarejanju (ACTA)),
U. whereas in 2007 the European Union, Japan and the United States announced the opening of negotiations with a view to a new multilateral agreement designed to strengthen the enforcement of IPRs and suppress counterfeiting and piracy (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement - ACTA),
V. ker bo ugoden zaključek trgovinskega sporazuma proti ponarejanju omogočil vzpostavitev splošnih standardov za civilno, kazensko in upravno zaščito, izboljšanje medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja in sodelovanja z zasebnim sektorjem ter vključitev tehnične pomoči, da bo spoštovanje pravic intelektualne lastnine enostavnejše, varnejše in cenejše,
V. whereas a favourable conclusion of the ACTA Agreement will make it possible to establish common standards for civil, criminal and administrative protection, improved interinstitutional cooperation and cooperation with the private sector, and the incorporation of technical assistance, with a view to making respect for IPRs simpler, safer and less costly,
W. ker je treba poudariti razlikovanje med generičnimi zdravili, katerih razširjanje in prodajo je treba spodbujati tako v Evropski uniji kot v državah v razvoju, ter ponarejenimi zdravili, ki na eni strani predstavljajo nevarnost za javno zdravje in na drugi strani povzročajo znatne gospodarske izgube za podjetja tega sektorja in lahko upočasnijo razvoj novih odkritij ter pri tem ne koristijo prebivalstvu manj razvitih držav; ker je poleg tega treba upoštevati, da so ponarejena zdravila samo del ilegalnih zdravil,
W. whereas a distinction needs to be drawn between generic medicines, the circulation of and trading in which should be encouraged, both in the EU and in developing countries, and counterfeit medicines, which, on the one hand, are dangerous for public health and, on the other, cause substantial economic losses to companies in the sector and may delay the development of new discoveries without benefiting the populations of the least developed countries; whereas, moreover, counterfeit medicines account for only part of illegal medicines,
X. ker internet in vzporedne trgovinske distribucijske mreže, kar se tiče izdelkov, ki imajo neposreden vpliv na javno zdravje, znatno prispevajo k razširjanju ponarejenih izdelkov, ki so nevarni za javno zdravje,
X. whereas, as regards products having direct impact on public health, internet and parallel trade distribution networks contribute greatly to the spread of counterfeit products that are dangerous to public health,
Y. ker si Evropska unija nenehno prizadeva za uskladitev ukrepov za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine, zlasti s predlogom Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskih ukrepih za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine ( KOM(2005)0276 ), in ker se trgovinska pogajanja, ki ne sodijo med običajne postopke odločanja v EU, ne smejo izogniti temu postopku usklajevanja,
Y. whereas the European Union is pursuing ongoing efforts to harmonise IPR enforcement measures, notably with a proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights ( COM(2005)0276 ), and this process should not be circumvented by trade negotiations which are outside the scope of the normal EU decision-making processes ,
Z. ker je bistveno zagotoviti, da se razvoj ukrepov za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine izvede brez oviranja inovacij ali konkurence, ogrožanja omejitev in izjem pri pravicah intelektualne lastnine ali osebnih podatkov, omejevanja prostega pretoka informacij in neupravičenega obremenjevanja zakonite trgovine,
Z. whereas it is also crucial to ensure that the development of IPR enforcement measures is accomplished in a manner that does not impede innovation or competition, undermine IPR limitations and exceptions or personal data, restrict the free flow of information, or unduly burden legitimate commerce,
AA. ker je po temeljitem dolgoletnem nadzoru Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta Evropska unija s sprejetjem niza direktiv s tega področja izkazala svojo zavezanost učinkovitemu in uravnoteženemu uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine,
AA. whereas the European Union has demonstrated its commitment to effective and balanced enforcement of IPR by adopting a set of directives in this field following detailed scrutiny by the European Parliament and the Council over many years,
AB. ker je temeljnega pomena, da se pri pripravi pravnih ukrepov upošteva bistvena razlika med pravicami intelektualne lastnine in pravicami na stvareh ter temu ustrezno tudi razlika med kršitvijo pravic in krajo,
AB. whereas it is fundamentally important, when considering legal measures, to recognise the substantive difference between intellectual and material property rights, and accordingly between infringement of rights and theft,
AC. ker so vse kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine škodljive za trgovino in poslovanje, vendar pa imajo kršitve v trgovinsko pomembnem obsegu dodatne in široke učinke,
AC. whereas all intellectual property infringements are damaging to trade and business but commercial scale infringements have additional and widespread effects,
AD. ker so kršitve avtorskih pravic in blagovnih znamk naklepna kazniva dejanja, medtem ko se kršitve patentov v primeru patentov za farmacevtske izdelke rešujejo posamično na podlagi vsebinskih argumentov, podanih v civilnih postopkih na podlagi kršitve patenta,
AD. whereas, in the case of patents on pharmaceutical products, whilst infringements of patents are settled case-by-case on the basis of substantive arguments made in civil proceedings on the grounds of a patent infringement, infringements of copyright and trademarks constitute intentional offences,
Večstranski okvir
The multilateral framework
2. poziva Komisijo, naj si v okviru Sveta TRIPs še naprej prizadeva, da bodo minimalne discipline, ki so vpeljane v nacionalno zakonodajo, spremljali učinkoviti ukrepi za izvajanje in preprečevanje kršitev;
Calls on the Commission to persevere in the TRIPS Council to ensure that the minimum rules incorporated into national law are accompanied by effective enforcement measures and measures to prevent infringements;
6. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v korist obsežnejšega izobraževanja potrošnikov v Evropi in tudi v državah v razvoju oblikujejo posebne pobude, ki bodo imele primerno finančno kritje, da se tako izognemo tveganjem, ki so povezana s potencialno nevarnimi ponarejenimi izdelki;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop specific measures, backed up by appropriate financial coverage, in favour of more widespread consumer education in Europe and also in developing countries, in order to avert the risks relating to potentially dangerous counterfeit products;
9. opozarja, da je v nekaterih gospodarstvih v vzponu proizvodnja ponarejenega in piratskega blaga dosegla vznemirljiv obseg; kljub temu, da pozdravlja pobude za sodelovanje, ki so bile do sedaj že oblikovane, pa meni, da so nujni posebni ukrepi za okrepitev usklajevanja med carinskimi službami, pravnimi organi in policijo z zadevnimi državami, kakor tudi za podpiranje usklajevanja zakonodaje teh držav z zakonodajo Evropske unije;
Points out that in several emerging economies, the production of counterfeit and pirated goods has reached alarming levels; whilst welcoming the cooperation initiatives hitherto implemented, is of the view that special measures are required in order to strengthen coordination between customs, judicial and police authorities with the countries concerned and to encourage the harmonisation of the laws of these countries with those of the European Union;
Člen 3(2) pravi: "Ti ukrepi, postopki in pravna sredstva so tudi dejanski, sorazmerni in odvračilni in se uporabljajo na tak način, da se izogibajo ustvarjanju ovir za zakonito trgovino in zagotavljajo zaščito pred zlorabo."
Calls on the Commission to introduce, in the same line of Article 3 (2)
Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 2004/48/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine
Article 3 (2) states that ” Those measures, procedures and remedies shall also be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and shall be applied in such a manner as to avoid the creation of barriers to legitimate trade and to provide for safeguards against their abuse. ” of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2004/48/EC of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights
12. je prepričan, da bo okrepitev boja proti ponarejanju šla prek večje in ciljne uporabe organa za reševanje sporov v okviru STO, ki lahko, skupaj z nacionalnimi sodišči in sodišči Skupnosti, zagotovi boljše varstvo evropske industrije in potrošnikov s pomočjo utrjevanja sodne prakse, ki bi okrepila vsebino in obseg sporazuma TRIPs;
Is convinced that in order to step up the fight against counterfeiting, more regular and targeted use should also be made of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body, which, together with the Community and national courts, can provide better protection of European industry and consumers by consolidating a case-law which enhances the substance and scope of the TRIPS agreement;
14. zahteva, da Komisija, istočasno z večstranskimi pogajanji, začne z bojem proti ponarejanju in piratstvu tudi prek dvostranskih, regionalnih in večstranskih sporazumov za približevanje zakonodaj in za njihovo dejansko izvajanje, da se razen tega predvidi vzpostavitev učinkovitih sistemov za reševanje sporov in sankcij v primeru neupoštevanja prevzetih obvez;
Calls on the Commission to continue its fight against counterfeiting and piracy, in parallel with the multilateral negotiations, also by means of bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements with a view to approximating and enforcing laws, also by providing for the establishment of efficient dispute settlement systems and penalties in case of failure to comply with the obligations underwritten;
16. meni, da še ni zanesljivo, ali Pogodba ES zagotavlja pravno podlago za ukrepe Skupnosti, ki določajo vrsto in stopnjo kazni, ter da posledično Komisija ne more biti pristojna, da se v imenu Skupnosti pogaja za mednarodni sporazum, ki določa vrsto in stopnjo kazenskopravnih ukrepov proti kršiteljem pravic blagovnih znamk in avtorskih pravic;
Considers that it is not yet certain whether the EC Treaty provides a legal basis for Community measures prescribing the type and level of criminal penalties and that, as a consequence, the Commission may not have competence to negotiate on behalf of the Community an international agreement which specifies the nature and level of criminal-law measures to be taken against trademark and copyright violators;