natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju direktive Sveta 96/97/ES z dne 20. decembra 1996, ki spreminja direktivo Sveta 86/378/EGS o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v poklicnih sistemih socialne varnosti
– having regard to Council Directive 96/97/EC of 20 December 1996 amending Directive 86/378/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes
UL L 46, 17.2.1997, str.
OJ L 46, 17.2.1997, p.
– ob upoštevanju direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost
– having regard to Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin
– ob upoštevanju direktive Sveta 2000/78/ES z dne z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu
– having regard to Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation
– ob upoštevanju direktive 2002/73/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. septembra 2002 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/207/EGS o izvrševanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve, poklicnega usposabljanja in napredovanja ter delovnih pogojev
– having regard to Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic
– having regard to Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States
77; popravek v UL L 229 29.6.2004, str.
77; corrigendum, OJ L 229, 29.6.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. februarja 2008 o 23. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti (2005)
– having regard to its resolution of 21 February 2008 on the Commission's 23rd Annual report on monitoring the application of Community law (2005)
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0060 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6­_TA(2008)0060. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0363/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0363/2008 ),
A. ker je učinkovitost politik EU v veliki meri odvisna od njihovega izvajanje na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni; ker je treba strogo nadzirati, kako države članice spoštujejo pravo Skupnosti, da bi zagotovili njegov zaželen pozitiven učinek na vsakodnevno življenje državljanov;
A. whereas the effectiveness of EU policies is largely determined by their implementation at national, regional and local levels; whereas compliance with Community legislation by the Member States must be rigorously controlled and monitored in order to ensure that it has the desired positive effects on the daily lives of citizens,
B. ker za ustrezno spremljanje uporabe prava Skupnosti ni dovolj, da se oceni le obseg njegovega prenosa, temveč je treba oceniti tudi njegovo kakovost in prakse, ki so jih države članice sprejele za njegovo uporabo,
B. whereas proper monitoring of the application of Community law involves not merely assessing transposition in quantitative terms but also evaluating the quality of transposition and of the practices adopted in applying Community law in the Member States,
C. ker je skupno število postopkov, ki jih je Komisija sprožila za ugotavljanje kršitev, v prejšnjih letih stalno naraščalo in je leta 2005 znašalo 2 653, leta 2006 pa je rahlo upadlo in sicer na 2 518; ker pristop desetih novih držav članic na število registriranih kršitev očitno ni vplival;
C. whereas after rising steadily in previous years to reach a total of 2 653 detected infringements in 2005, the total number of infringement proceedings initiated by the Commission fell slightly – to 2 518 – in 2006; whereas the accession of 10 new Member States seems not to have had any impact on the number of registered infringements,
D. ker je število postopkov, ki so bili v primeru EU-25 leta 2006 sproženi zaradi neobveščanja o ukrepih o prenosu, v primerjavi z letom 2005 padlo za 16 %, s 1 079 na 904, in sicer zaradi zmanjšanja števila direktiv, ki so imele rok tega leta (s 123 leta 2005 na 108 leta 2006), ter zaradi hitrejšega obveščanja s strani držav članic,
D. whereas, in respect of the EU-25, the number of proceedings initiated in 2006 for failure to notify transposing measures fell by 16% with respect to 2005, from 1 079 to 904 cases, owing to a reduction in the number of directives with a deadline for the year from 123 in 2005 to 108 in 2006 and to prompter notification by Member States,
E. ker statistični podatki, ki jih je Komisija navedla za leto 2006, kažejo, da sodišča v številnih državah članicah ne želijo uporabljati postopka predhodnega odločanja, ki ga predvideva člen 234 pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti; ker je to morda posledica še vedno neustreznega poznavanja prava Skupnosti;
E. whereas the statistics for 2006 quoted by the Commission show that the courts in many Member States are reluctant to make use of the preliminary rulings procedure provided for in Article 234 of the Treaty establishing the European Community; whereas this may due to a still inadequate grasp of Community law,
G. ker pritožbe državljanov pri gradnji „Evrope državljanov” niso le simboličnega značaja, temveč so izmerljivo in učinkovito sredstvo za spremljanje uporabe prava Skupnosti,
G. whereas citizens' complaints are not merely symbolic in building a 'people's Europe' but also constitute a measurable and efficient means of monitoring the application of Community law,
H. ker so peticije, naslovljene na Parlament, dragoceno sredstvo za odkrivanje kršitev prava Skupnosti in ker je v zadnjih letih njihovo število pomembno naraslo in jih je bilo leta 2006 oddanih okoli 1000,
H. whereas petitions to Parliament are a valuable means of detecting infringements of Community law in Member States, and whereas over recent years the number of petitions has increased significantly, with some 1 000 being submitted in 2006,
I. ker se v peticijah najpogosteje pojavljajo problemi, povezni s priznanjem izobrazbe in poklicnih kvalifikacij, z davki, s pravico do prostega gibanja po ozemlju držav članic in s diskriminacijo,
I. whereas the issues most commonly raised in petitions concern the recognition of educational and professional qualifications, taxation, the right to freedom of movement within the territory of the Member States and discrimination-related matters,
J. ker je bilo leta 2006 pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic vloženo 3 830 pritožb, kar je stabilna številka; ker 75 % pritožb, ki so bile naslovljene na varuha človekovih pravic, ni sodilo v njegove pristojnosti, temveč so zanje pristojne nacionalne ali pa regionalne oblasti v državah članicah in ker se je, tako kot v prejšnjih letih, 70 % pritožb, ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic obravnaval, nanašalo na Komisijo,
J. whereas in 2006 the number of complaints lodged with the European Ombudsman remained stable at 3 830; whereas 75% of the complaints received fell outside the Ombudsman’s sphere of competence, being matters for the national or regional authorities in Member States, and, as in previous years, 70% of the inquiries opened by the Ombudsman concerned the Commission,
K. ker je načelo nediskriminacije eden izmed temeljev evropskega integracijskega procesa in je neposredno povezano z delovanjem notranjega trga, pri čemer se posebej izpostavlja načelo prostega gibanja oseb, storitev, blaga in kapitala, ter ker zagotavlja enake pravice in priložnosti za vse državljane Evropske unije,
K. whereas the principle of non-discrimination is one of the cornerstones of the European integration process and is directly linked to the operation of the internal market, with particular reference to the principle of the free movement of persons, services, goods and capital, and whereas it guarantees equal rights and opportunities for all European Union citizens,
L. ker državljanstvo Evropske unije, kot ga vzpostavlja maastrichtska pogodba, državljanom omogoča, da se prosto gibljejo po ozemlju držav članic, ter jim zagotavlja številne politične pravice, in ker so institucije EU poroki za te pravice,
L. whereas citizenship of the European Union, as established in the Maastricht Treaty, guarantees citizens the right to move freely within the territory of the Member States, together with a number of political rights, and whereas the EU institutions stand as guarantors of those rights,
M. ker je bilo leto 2006 določeno kot rok za prenos direktive 2004/38/ES, ki posplošuje pravico do prostega gibanja na ozemlju držav članic,
M. whereas the deadline for transposing Directive 2004/38/EC, concerning the right of all citizens to move and reside freely within the territory of the European Union, was fixed at 2006,
N. ker se študenti pri prostem pretoku in dostopu do visokošolskega izobraževanja v drugih državah članicah Evropske unije še vedno srečujejo z ovirami, kakršne so denimo upravne ovire ali sistemi kvot (diskriminatoren odnos do tujih študentov, ki se želijo vpisati na univerze), in ker Evropska unija lahko posreduje le v primerih diskriminacije na podlagi nacionalnosti,
N. whereas students continue to experience difficulties in enjoying free movement or gaining access to higher education in other Member States of the European Union, such as administrative barriers or quota systems (which discriminate against foreign students wishing to register at universities) and whereas the EU can intervene only in the event of discrimination based on nationality,
O. ker iz člena 39 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti izhaja, da predvideva prost pretok delovne sile odpravo vsakršne diskriminacije delavcev iz ostalih držav članic pri zaposlovanju, plačilu in ostalih pogojih dela ter da vsebuje iz tega izhajajoče evropsko pravo vrsto predpisov za učinkovit boj proti tej obliki diskriminacije,
O. whereas Article 39 of the EC Treaty stipulates that the free movement of workers entails the abolition of any discrimination against workers from other Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work, and whereas secondary Community law includes a series of provisions designed to combat this type of discrimination effectively,
P. ker je stopnja uporabe prava Skupnosti v določeni državi članici, tudi na področju zaščite okolja, neposredno povezana z njeno sposobnostjo, da črpa sredstva, ki so na voljo za osnovne naložbe ter infrastrukturne in prenovitvene projekte,
P. whereas there is a direct link between the degree to which a Member State implements Community law, including in the field of environmental protection, and that Member State’s ability to take up funding available for essential investment, infrastructure and modernisation projects,
1. pozdravlja omenjeno sporočilo Komisije z dne 5. septembra 2007 in njena prizadevanja za izboljšanje tekočih delovnih metod, da bi med prednostne naloge uvrstili upravljanje tekočih postopkov in jih pospešili; obžaluje, da Komisija še ni odgovorila ali se odzvala na prej omenjeno resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. februarja 2008, v kateri Evropski parlament Komisijo naproša, naj posreduje natančne podatke o različnih vidikih uporabe prava Skupnosti, s posebnim poudarkom na oblikovanju nove, prej omenjene metode dela;
Welcomes the above-mentioned Commission Communication of 5 September 2007 and the Commission's undertaking to improve current working methods with a view to prioritising and accelerating the handling and management of existing proceedings; points out, nonetheless, that the Commission has not yet responded to or acted upon Parliament's abovementioned resolution of 21 February 2008, in which it calls on the Commission to provide specific information on various aspects of the implementation of Community law, with particular reference to the development of the abovementioned new working method;
3. poudarja, da je v skladu s členom 211 pogodbe o ES Komisija tista institucija, ki je odgovorna, da se določbe pogodbe in ukrepi, ki jih institucije sprejmejo v skladu s pogodbo, izvajajo, po členu 226 pa je pooblaščena tudi za ukrepanje proti vsaki državi članici, ki ne izpolnjuje obveznosti iz pogodbe;
Stresses that, under Article 211 of the EC Treaty, the Commission is the institution responsible for ensuring that the provisions of the Treaty and the measures taken by the institutions pursuant thereto are applied, and, under Article 226, is empowered to take action against any Member State failing to fulfil a Treaty obligation;
7. poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s še vedno perečim problemom, ko države članice ne izpolnjujejo rokov za prenos direktiv, pripravi seznam direktiv, pri katerih je stopnja uporabe najnižja, ter navede razloge zanje;
Calls on the Commission, in connection with the continuing problem of Member States failing to meet deadlines for the transposition of directives, to supply a list of the directives showing the lowest rate of implementation, together with details of the likely reasons therefor;
9. opozarja, da nacionalna sodišča v večini držav članic ne sodelujejo dovolj s Sodiščem in niso pripravljena uporabljati načela vladavine prava Skupnosti; nadalje opozarja na izredno pomembno vlogo postopka predhodnega odločanja pri ustrezni uporabi prava Skupnosti;
Draws attention to the insufficient degree of cooperation with the Court of Justice by the national courts in most Member States, which remain reluctant to apply the principle of the primacy of Community law; points, furthermore, to the preliminary ruling procedure’s extremely important role in the proper application of Community law;
12. poudarja, da so peticije, čeprav le redke izmed njih (4 v letu 2006) opozarjajo na dejanske kršitve prava Skupnosti, neprecenljiv vir informacij o temeljnih zahtevah evropskih državljanov in bi jih morala Komisija uporabljati kot kazalce pri zakonodajnih ukrepih;
Points out that, although few of them (four in 2006) bring to light genuine infringements of Community law, petitions are an irreplaceable source of information on the fundamental requirements of Europe’s citizens and should be used as a pointer by the Commission in connection with legislative measures;
16. pozdravlja dejstvo, da so letnim poročilom Komisije o nadzoru nad uporabo prava Skupnosti priložene priloge z obsežnejšimi informacijami o podatkih iz poročila in z osnovnimi statističnimi podatki;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission’s annual reports on the application of Community law are accompanied by annexes expanding on the information set out in the report and supplying essential statistics;
Sodelovanje med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti
Cooperation between the European Parliament and the national parliaments
Boj proti diskriminaciji v Evropski uniji
Combating discrimination in the European Union
23. poziva države članice, naj spoštujejo pravice, ki izhajajo iz državljanstva EU, vključno s pravico do glasovanja in kandidiranja na volitvah v Evropski parlament, ki je še posebej pomembna v luči volitev leta 2009;
Calls on the Member States to respect the rights deriving from EU citizenship, including the right to vote and stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament, which is of particular importance in the run-up to the 2009 elections;
26. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija dne 2. julija 2008 v skladu s strategijo politike za leto 2008 sprejela predlog horizontalne direktive, ki bi uporabljala načelo enakega obravnavanja tudi izven okvira zaposlovanja in zagotavljala enak dostop do blaga, storitev, stanovanj, izobraževanja, socialne zaščite in ugodnosti.
Welcomes the Commission’s adoption on 2 July 2008, as provided for in the annual policy strategy for 2008, of the proposal for a horizontal directive implementing the principle of equal treatment outside the scope of employment and ensuring equal access to goods, services, housing, education, social protection and social advantages, and takes the view that this constitutes an important addition to the current anti-discrimination package;
29. naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the European Ombudsman and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Namen poročila je oceniti, kako je Komisija nadzorovala uporabo prava Skupnosti v letu 2006.
The purpose of this report is to assess the monitoring of Community law by the Commission in 2006.
Ta dokument je bil oblikovan s pomočjo 24. poročila Komisije o uporabi prava Skupnosti in njegovih prilog, poročila odbora za pravne zadeve, resolucij Evropskega parlamenta s prejšnjih let in letnega poročila o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2006 ter s pomočjo podatkov, ki so jih posredovale pristojne službe, in znanstvenih študij.
The report draws on the Commission's 24th annual report on monitoring the application of Community law and the annexes thereto, the reports of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Parliament's resolutions from previous years, the European Ombudsman's annual report for 2006, information obtained from the relevant Commission departments and research findings.
Podrobno je bila pregledana tudi sodna praksa Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti.
A close look was also taken at the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (CJEC).
Komisija je v skladu s členom 211 pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (PES) kot varuh pogodb dolžna zagotoviti, da se pravo Skupnosti v državah članicah ustrezno uporablja in izpolnjuje.
Under Article 211 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (ECT), the Commission, as 'guardian of the Treaties', is required to ensure that Community law is correctly implemented and complied with in the Member States.
To je tudi cilj postopka iz člena 226 PES, ki daje Komisiji pooblastila, da sproži postopek proti državi članici, ki ne izpolnjuje obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz članstva Evropske unije.
The same goal is sought by the procedure provided for in Article 226 of the ECT, which empowers the Commission to initiate proceedings against any Member State failing to fulfil an obligation stemming from membership of the European Union.
Komisija lahko sproži postopke na lastno pobudo ali kot odgovor na pritožbo državljana ali države članice, kot odgovor na peticijo, ki jo je državljan vložil pri odboru Parlamenta za peticije, ali kot odgovor na ukrepanje Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
The Commission may initiate proceedings on its own initiative or in response to a complaint lodged with it by a citizen or a Member State, to a petition submitted by a citizen to Parliament's Committee on Petitions or to action taken by the European Ombudsman.
Postopke se lahko zaključi s sporazumno rešitvijo ali, če to ni mogoče, s sodbo Sodišča, ki lahko v nadaljnjih postopkih državi članici naloži denarno kazen (člen 228 PES).
Such proceedings may be brought to a close by an amicable solution or, should this prove impossible, by a judgment of the Court of Justice, which, in further proceedings, may impose a penalty payment on the Member State concerned.
Kot je Parlament že večkrat poudaril, je možnost pritožbe pri Komisiji, Parlamentu in Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic pomembna tudi zato, ker med državljani EU krepi ozaveščenost o pripadnosti skupnosti, ki temelji na vladavini prava.
As Parliament has pointed out on many occasions, the ability to lodge complaints with the Commission, Parliament and the European Ombudsman is also important in that it helps build an awareness among EU citizens of belonging to a community based on the rule of law.
To je še posebej pomembno glede na to, da ima javnost omejen dostop do pravnega sistema EU, kar je posledica strogih zahtev glede dopustnosti za primere, ki jih lahko pri Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti sprožijo posamezniki.
This is particularly important in view of the public's limited access to the EU justice system resulting from the stringent admissibility requirements for cases brought before the CJEC by individuals.
Hkrati je Parlament v svojih prejšnjih resolucijah o spremljanju prava Skupnosti, pri čemer velja posebej omeniti resolucijo z dne 21. februarja 2008, ki temelji na poročilu Monice Frassoni, izrazil zaskrbljenost tako glede nepreglednih postopkov registriranja pritožb, ki jih pri Komisiji vložijo državljani, kot glede trajanja postopkov, kadar se države članice prisili v ustrezno izvajanje prava Skupnosti s sodbo Sodišča Evropskih Skupnosti.
At the same time, in its earlier resolutions on the monitoring of Community law, with particular reference to that adopted on 21 February 2008 on the basis of a report by Monica Frassoni, Parliament has expressed concern both at the non-transparent procedure for the registration of complaints submitted by citizens to the Commission and at the duration of proceedings to oblige Member States properly to implement Community law by means of a CJEC judgment.
V zvezi z omenjenim je Parlament pozdravil sporočilo Komisije, naslovljeno „Evropa rezultatov – uporaba prava skupnosti“ ( KOM(2007)0502 ), in njena prizadevanja za izboljšanje tekočih delovnih metod, da bi med prednostne naloge uvrstili upravljanje tekočih postopkov in jih pospešili.
In connection with the above, Parliament has welcomed the Commission communication entitled 'A Europe of results – Applying Community law' ( COM(2007)0502 ) and the Commission's stated intention to improve current working methods with the aim of prioritising and accelerating the handling and management of existing proceedings.
Glede pilotskega projekta, ki vključuje 15 držav članic in se je pričel 15. aprila 2008 ter je namenjen preverjanju novih delovnih metod, bi bilo treba ob koncu prvega leta izvesti začetno oceno.
The pilot project involving 15 Member States that was launched on 15 April 2008 with a view to testing out new working methods should be the subject of an initial assessment at the end of the first year.
V obeh primerih je bilo število pritožb, za katere je bilo ocenjeno, da so izven pristojnosti omenjenih teles, znova zelo visoko (75 % v primeru varuha človekovih pravic in 30 % v primeru odbora za peticij), kar kaže na to, da je treba državljane EU še naprej ustrezno obveščati o zakonih in politikah ter o odgovornostih posameznih institucij.
In both cases, the percentage of complaints deemed to be outside the relevant remit was once again extremely high (75% in the case of the Ombudsman and 30% in the case of the Committee on Petitions), thus illustrating the continuing need for EU citizens to be properly informed of EU laws and policies and the responsibilities of the individual institutions.
Zaradi velikega števila peticij, ki so bile naslovljene tako na Komisijo kot na Parlament, je še posebej pomembno njuno usklajevanje na tem področju.
In view of the significant number of petitions addressed to both the Commission and Parliament, coordination of the activities of the two institutions in this area is particularly important.
Glede na to, da se odbor za peticije med drugim opira na preiskave Komisije glede morebitnih kršitev prava Skupnost, so priporočila Komisije še naprej pomembna pri zagotavljanju, da so odgovori na vprašanja iz peticij, kar se da, točni.
Given that the Committee on Petitions relies on, among other things, the Commission's investigations into potential infringements of Community law, the Commission's recommendations remain an important means of ensuring that the answers given on the issues raised by petitions are as accurate as possible.