natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zdi se, da je to prvi poskus za ločeno obravnavanje teh regij, ki so zdaj v obdobju uvajanja ali v obdobju postopnega izločanja, razpete med obema ciljema.
This appears to be a first attempt to deal separately with these regions that are now scattered as "phasing in" or "phasing out" regions between the two Objectives.
Poročevalec v kontekstu teritorialne kohezije popolnoma podpira ta pristop, saj bodo te regije dobile jasnejši status, predvsem pa bo potrjeno, da je treba zasnovati in uveljaviti bolj celovit sistem postopne prehodne pomoči za regije, ki bodo kmalu presegle prag upravičenosti 75 % BDP.
The rapporteur fully endorses this approach in the context of territorial cohesion, not only because it gives a clearer status to these regions, but mainly as a recognition to the fact that a more comprehensive system of gradual transitional assistance to regions that will soon be above the 75% GDP threshold needs to be designed and put in place.
V zeleni knjigo o teritorialni koheziji so navedena tudi številna druga vprašanja, ki jih je treba upoštevati, na primer dostop do storitev splošnega pomena ali oblikovanje dodatnih kazalnikov, da bi bolje spremljali značilnosti in usmeritve teritorialne kohezije.
The Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion also alludes to a number of other issues that have to be taken into consideration, like access to services of general interest or the creation of additional indicators to better monitor characteristics and trends in territorial cohesion.
V poročilu so navedena poročevalčeva stališča o tem.
The report brings forward the rapporteur’s views on all these matters.
V poročilu so predstavljena številna stališča o ustreznih sporočilih Komisije, pa tudi predlogi za Komisijo, države članice ter regionalne in lokalne organe o pripravi podlage za boljše razumevanje, kaj bi lahko bila teritorialna kohezija in kaj bi bile njene koristi za vse, ki sodelujejo pri vključevanju teritorialne razsežnosti v kohezijsko politiko.
The present report formulates a number of considerations on the reference communications by the Commission and addresses suggestions to the Commission, Member States and regional and local authorities with the scope of preparing the ground for a better understanding of what territorial cohesion could be and what would be the implications for all parties involved of the integration of the territorial dimension in cohesion policy.
Pričakuje se tudi, da bo v poročilu usklajeno stališče Evropskega parlamenta in stališče iz vseevropske razprave o teritorialni koheziji, saj bo ta razprava bistveno vplivala na prihodnost regionalne in kohezijske politike po letu 2013 ter na obliko strukturnih skladov v naslednjem programskem obdobju.
However, more importantly, the report is expected to consolidate a position of the European Parliament in the Europe-wide debate on territorial cohesion, as this debate will influence greatly a larger debate on the future of regional and cohesion policy after 2013 and the shape of the structural funds in the next programming period.
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0402 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0402 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 175(1) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C6–0278/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0278/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6–0084/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0084/2009 ),
(7) Uredba (ES) št. 761/2001 je pokazala svojo učinkovitost glede spodbujanja izboljšav pri okoljski uspešnosti organizacij, izkušnje, pridobljene pri izvajanju te uredbe, pa bi bilo treba uporabiti za okrepitev zmožnosti sistema EMAS za doseganje izboljšav pri splošni okoljski uspešnosti organizacij.
(7) Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 demonstrated its effectiveness in promoting improvements of the environmental performance of organisations and the experience gathered from the implementation of that Regulation should be used to enhance the ability of EMAS to bring about an improvement in the overall environmental performance of organisations.
(7) Uredba (ES) št. 761/2001 je pokazala svojo omejeno učinkovitost glede spodbujanja izboljšav pri okoljski uspešnosti organizacij, izkušnje, pridobljene pri izvajanju te uredbe, pa bi bilo treba uporabiti za okrepitev zmožnosti sistema EMAS za doseganje izboljšav pri splošni okoljski uspešnosti organizacij.
(7) Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 demonstrated its limited effectiveness in promoting improvements of the environmental performance of organisations and the experience gathered from the implementation of that Regulation should be used to enhance the ability of EMAS to bring about an improvement in the overall environmental performance of organisations.
V študiji EVER, ki je bila opravljena za GD za okolje, je navedeno, da večina kvantitativnih študij ni uspela potrditi, da imajo organizacije, registrirane v sistemu EMAS, večjo okoljsko uspešnost v primerjavi z drugimi organizacijami, zato je treba vpliv sheme ponovno preučiti.
The EVER study, carried out on behalf of DG Environment, included the statement that most quantitative studies have not been able to confirm a better environmental performance of EMAS-registered organisations as compared to other organizations, and this is why it is important to review the impact of the scheme
(8) Organizacije bi bilo treba spodbujati, da sodelujejo v sistemu EMAS prostovoljno in lahko pridobijo dodano vrednost v smislu predpisanega nadzora, prihrankov pri stroških in podobe v javnosti.
(8) Organisations should be encouraged to participate in EMAS on a voluntary basis and may gain added value in terms of regulatory control, cost savings and public image.
(8) Organizacije bi bilo treba spodbujati, da sodelujejo v sistemu EMAS prostovoljno in lahko pridobijo dodano vrednost v smislu predpisanega nadzora, prihrankov pri stroških in podobe v javnosti , če lahko dokažejo visoko raven okoljske uspešnosti .
(8) Organisations should be encouraged to participate in EMAS on a voluntary basis and may gain added value in terms of regulatory control, cost savings and public image , provided that they are able to demonstrate a high level of environmental performance .
Spodbude ali nagrade bi morale biti povezane z merljivimi in preverljivimi uspehi in dosežki.
Any incentive or award should be linked to measurable and verifiable performance and achievements.
(15) Logotip sistema EMAS bi moral biti privlačno komunikacijsko in tržniško orodje za organizacije, ki bi lahko povečevalo ozaveščenost strank sistema EMAS.
(15) The EMAS logo should be an attractive communication and marketing tool for organisations, which raises the awareness of customers to EMAS.
Pravila za uporabo logotipa sistema EMAS bi morala biti poenostavljena z uporabo enotnega logotipa, sedanje omejitve pa bi bilo treba odpraviti, tako da ne bi prihajalo do zamenjav z znaki za okolje za proizvode.
Rules for the use of the EMAS logo should be simplified by the use of one single logo and existing restrictions should be removed as far as there should be no confusion with environmental product labels.
Pravila za uporabo logotipa sistema EMAS bi morala biti poenostavljena z uporabo enotnega logotipa, sedanje omejitve pa bi bilo treba odpraviti, razen tistih za proizvode in embalažo .
Rules for the use of the EMAS logo should be simplified by the use of one single logo and existing restrictions should be removed save for those relating to product and packaging.
Tako ne bi prihajalo do zamenjav z znaki za okolje za proizvode.
There should be no confusion with environmental product labels.
Uporaba logotipa sistema EMAS na proizvodu in embalaži bi povzročila zamenjave z znakom za okolje (Eco-label).
The use of the EMAS logo on product and packaging would lead to confusion with the Eco-label.
Predlagano besedilo je vzeto iz obstoječe uredbe.
The proposed wording is taken from the existing regulation.
(18) Za zagotovitev ustreznosti in primerljivosti informacij bi moralo poročanje o napredku pri okoljski uspešnosti organizacij temeljiti na splošnih kazalnikih uspešnosti, osredotočenih na ključna okoljska področja.
(18) In order to ensure relevance and comparability of the information, reporting on the progress in the organisations’ environmental performance should be on the basis of generic performance indicators focusing on key environmental areas.
Tako bi lahko organizacije laže primerjale svojo uspešnost v različnih obdobjih poročanja .
This should help organisations compare their performance over different reporting periods.
(18) Za zagotovitev ustreznosti in primerljivosti informacij bi moralo poročanje o okoljski uspešnosti organizacij temeljiti na sektorskih kazalnikih uspešnosti, osredotočenih na ključna okoljska področja na ravni procesa in proizvoda ob uporabi ustreznih primerjalnih meril in lestvic .
(18) In order to ensure relevance and comparability of the information, reporting the organisations’ environmental performance should be on the basis of sector-specific performance indicators focusing on key environmental areas at process and product level s using appropriate benchmarks and scales.
Tako bi lahko organizacije laže primerjale svojo uspešnost z uspešnostjo drugih organizacij .
This should help organisations compare their performance with the performance of other organisations.
Splošni kazalniki, kot so skupna poraba energije, ponavadi niso smiselni, ker ne omogočajo utemeljenih primerjav med organizacijami.
Generic indicators such as total energy consumption are normally not meaningful as they do not allow for reasonable comparisons between organisations.
Tudi če so taki podatki povezani s fizičnimi ali denarnimi rezultati, vključno z dodano vrednostjo ali številom zaposlenih, povedo zelo malo in se lahko enačijo z rezultati, ki bi jih dobili, če bi primerjali jabolka in hruške.
Even if such data are related to the physical or monetary output, including the value added or number of employees, the data says very little, and could be equated with the results of comparing apples and oranges.
Predpogoj za resno oceno uspešnosti in primerjalno analizo je primerjanje primerljivih dejavnosti ali procesov, vključno s posrednimi dejavnostmi, kot so izdelki.
A pre-requisite for serious assessments of performance and benchmarking is to compare comparable activities or processes, including indirect activities such as products.
(20) Uredba (ES) št. xxxx/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne […. datum] o določitvi zahtev za akreditacijo in nadzor trga v zvezi s trženjem izdelkov ureja akreditacijo na nacionalni in evropski ravni ter določa splošni okvir za akreditacijo.
(20) Regulation (EC) No xxxx/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of [……………. date] setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products organises accreditation at the national and European levels and sets the over all framework for accreditation.
Ta uredba dopolnjuje ta pravila, kolikor je to potrebno, ob upoštevanju posebnih lastnosti sistema EMAS, zlasti potrebe po zagotovitvi visoke stopnje verodostojnosti med interesnimi skupinami, zlasti državami članicami, in, kadar je to primerno, ob določitvi natančnejših pravil.
This regulation complements these rules in so far as necessary, while taking into account the specific features of EMAS notably the need to ensure a high credibility towards stakeholders, especially Member State and, where appropriate, setting more specific rules.
(20) Ta uredba ohranja sistem postopkov in določb za licenciranje in nadzor okoljskih preveriteljev, kot so bili sprejeti leta 1993 s prvo uredbo EMAS.
(20) This Regulation maintains the system of procedures and quality provisions for the licensing and supervision of environmental verifiers as adopted in 1993 in the first EMAS Regulation.
To pomeni, da lahko države članice ohranijo svoje sisteme za licenciranje in nadzor, ki so v nekaterih državah članicah pravno zavezujoča okoljska zakonodaja, ki posameznikom omogoča dostop do nekaterih poklicev, npr. okoljskega preveritelja.
That means that Member States may keep their licensing and supervision systems, which are in some Member States legally binding environmental law, which give individual persons access to a certain profession, i.e. the environmental verifier.
Vendar pa lahko države članice izpolnijo določbe te uredbe tudi tako, da uporabljajo akreditacijski organ iz Uredbe (ES) Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta št. 765/2008 z dne 9. julija 2008 o določitvi zahtev za akreditacijo in nadzor trga v zvezi s trženjem proizvodov, hkrati pa zagotovijo, da EMAS zagotavlja kakovost vsake osebe, ki zaprosi za delo kot okoljski preveritelj, ne zgolj organizacij.
However, Member States may use their accreditation body under Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products , in order to fulfil the provisions of this Regulation, whilst ensuring that EMAS provides for the quality of each single person that applies to work as an environmental verifier, and not only of organisations.
Te določbe bi morale zagotavljati in nenehno izboljševati usposobljenost okoljskih preveriteljev z zagotovitvijo neodvisnega in nevtralnega akreditacijskega sistema, usposabljanjem in ustreznim nadzorom njihovih dejavnosti ter tako zagotavlja preglednost in verodostojnost organizacij, ki sodelujejo v sistemu EMAS.
Those provisions should ensure and steadily improve the competence of environmental verifiers by providing for an independent and neutral accreditation system, training and an appropriate supervision of their activities and thus guarantee the transparency and credibility of organisations participating in EMAS.
Določbe EMAS bi morale zagotavljati in nenehno izboljševati usposobljenost okoljskih preveriteljev z zagotovitvijo neodvisnega in nevtralnega akreditacijskega sistema, usposabljanjem in ustreznim nadzorom njihovih dejavnosti ter tako zagotavljati preglednost in verodostojnost organizacij, ki sodelujejo v sistemu EMAS.
The EMAS provisions should ensure and steadily improve the competence of environmental verifiers by providing for an independent and neutral accreditation system, training and an appropriate supervision of their activities and thus guarantee the transparency and credibility of organisations participating in EMAS.
Licenciranje okoljskih preveriteljev se šteje kot dovoljenje za opravljanje poklica, ki je primerljivo z dovoljenjem za inženirje ali finančne revizorje.
The licensing of environmental verifiers is considered to be a professional authorisation which is comparable to the authorisation of a civil engineer or a financial auditor.
Zato je treba spremembo postopka in organa licenciranja v skladu z novim pristopom zavrniti.
Consequently modifying the licensing procedure and body in line with the new approach is to be rejected.
V prihodnje naj licenciranje ostane še naprej v pristojnosti držav članic te pa naj same odločijo, kako bodo uredile postopek za izdajo dovoljenj in nadzor okoljskih preveriteljev.
In future the licensing shall remain within the competence of the Member States leaving it up to them how they regulate the procedure for the authorisation and supervision of environmental verifiers.
(22) Brez vpliva na pravila o državni pomoči iz Pogodbe EU bi morale države članice organizacijam, registriranim v sistemu EMAS, dajati spodbude, kot so dostop do sredstev ali davčne spodbude v okviru sistemov, ki podpirajo okoljsko uspešnost panoge.
(22) Without prejudice to the rules of the Treaty on state aid, incentives should be given by Member States to registered organisations such as access to funding or tax incentives in the framework of schemes supporting environmental performance of industry.
(22) Brez vpliva na pravila o državni pomoči iz Pogodbe EU bi morale države članice organizacijam, registriranim v sistemu EMAS, ki dosegajo odličnost pri okoljski uspešnosti, dajati spodbude, kot so dostop do sredstev ali davčne spodbude v okviru sistemov, ki podpirajo okoljsko uspešnost panoge.
(22) Without prejudice to the rules of the Treaty on state aid, incentives should be given by Member States to registered organisations that achiev e a performance of excellence such as access to funding or tax incentives in the framework of schemes supporting environmental performance of industry.
(24) Komisija bi morala za zagotovitev usklajene uporabe te uredbe , če je to primerno, oblikovati sektorske referenčne dokumente na področju, ki ga zajema ta uredba.
(24) With the aim of ensuring a harmonised application of this Regulation the Commission shall , if appropriate, produce sectoral reference documents in the area covered by this Regulation.
(24) Komisija bi morala za zagotovitev usklajene uporabe te uredbe oblikovati sektorske referenčne dokumente na področju, ki ga zajema ta uredba , ob upoštevanju prednostnega programa, ki so ga pregledale države članice in interesne skupine .
(24) With the aim of ensuring a harmonised application of this Regulation the Commission shall produce sectoral reference documents in the area covered by this Regulation following a priority programme reviewed by the Member States and stakeholders.
(25) To uredbo bi bilo treba po potrebi spremeniti na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih po določenem obdobju izvajanja .
(25) This Regulation should be revised, if appropriate, in the light of experience gained after a certain period of operation .
(25) To uredbo bi bilo treba po potrebi pregledati na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih v petih letih od začetka njene veljave .
(25) This Regulation should be revised, if appropriate, in the light of experience gained within five years of its entry into force .
Ta revizija bi morala predvsem oceniti vpliv sistema na okolje in število udeležencev v njem, da bi se lahko sprejela odločitev o njenem nadaljevanju, ki temelji na informacijah.
Th at revision sh ould assess in particular the impact of the scheme on the environment and the number of participants in the scheme, in order to inform a decision on its continuation.
Sistem EMAS postavlja precej velike zahteve za sodelujoče organizacije, Komisijo in države članice.
EMAS requires considerable effort by participating organisations, the Commission and Member States.
Ta predlog ima za cilj izboljšanje obstoječe uredbe.
This proposal aims to improve the existing Regulation.
Med revizijo je treba pošteno oceniti resničen vpliv teh sprememb.
An honest assessment of the real impact of these changes is required during the revision process.
(1) „okoljska politika“ pomeni splošne cilje in načela ukrepanja organizacije v zvezi z okoljem , kar vključuje skladnost z vsemi veljavnimi zakonskimi zahtevami v zvezi z okoljem in tudi zavezanost nenehnemu izboljševanju okoljske uspešnosti;
(1) "environmental policy" means an organisation’s overall aims and principles of action with respect to the environment including compliance with all applicable legal requirements relating to the environment and also a commitment to continual improvement of environmental performance;
Opredelitve morajo biti čim bližje standardu ISO 14001, da bi se omogočil postopni dostop.
Definitions should be as closely aligned to ISO 14001 as possible to facilitate the step-up approach.
(2) „okoljska uspešnost“ pomeni rezultate upravljanja okoljskih vidikov organizacije;
(2) "environmental performance" means the results of an organisation's management of its environmental aspects;
(2) „okoljska uspešnost“ pomeni merljive rezultate upravljanja okoljskih vidikov organizacije;
(2) "environmental performance" means the measurable results of an organisation's management of its environmental aspects;
(12) „sistem okoljskega ravnanja“ pomeni del celotnega sistema vodenja , ki vključuje organizacijsko strukturo, dejavnosti načrtovanja, odgovornosti, prakso, postopke, procese in vire za razvoj, izvedbo, doseganje, pregledovanje in vzdrževanje okoljske politike ;
(12) "environmental management system" means the part of the overall management system that includes the organisational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy;
Člen 2 – točka 16
Article 2 – point 16
(16) „poročilo o okoljski uspešnosti“ pomeni celovite informacije za javnost in druge zainteresirane strani o okoljski učinkovitosti organizacije in njenem izpolnjevanju veljavnih zakonskih zahtev v zvezi z okoljem;
(16) "environmental performance report" means the comprehensive information to the public and other interested parties regarding the organisation's environmental performance and compliance with applicable legal obligations relating to the environment;
Komisija je predlagala nov sistem poročanja, ki pa ni potreben.
The Commission has proposed a new reporting mechanism that is not needed.
Sedanji sistem letnega posodabljanja okoljske izjave zadostuje, vendar so potrebni novi glavni kazalniki uspešnosti.
The current system of annual updates of the environmental statement is sufficient, but with new core performance indicators .
(18) „okoljski preveritelj“ pomeni vsako fizično ali pravno osebo, združenje ali skupino takih oseb, ki se šteje za organ za presojo skladnosti, kakor je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. xxxx/2008, in ki je pridobil akreditacijo v skladu s to uredbo ;
(18) "environmental verifier" means any natural or legal person, or any association or group of such persons qualifying as a conformity assessment body as defined in Regulation (EC) No xxxx/2008 , who has obtained accreditation, in accordance with this Regulation;
(18) „okoljski preveritelj“ pomeni vsako fizično ali pravno osebo, združenje ali skupino takih oseb, ki je/so pridobila(-e) akreditacijo v skladu s postopki in pogoji iz Poglavja V in ki je/so neodvisna(-e) od zadevne organizacije ;
(18) "environmental verifier" means any natural or legal person , or any association or group of such persons which has or have obtained an accreditation in accordance with the procedures and conditions of Chapter V, and which is independent from the relevant organisation.
V državah članicah se že več let uporablja delujoč in preverjen sistem akreditacij.
A well functioning and tested accreditation system has been operating in the Member States for a number of years.
Spreminjati ta delujoči sistem, ki je bil vzpostavljen v skladu s členom 5 EMAS II, bi bilo kontraproduktivno.
It would be counterproductive to change this well functioning system which was set up in line with Art. 5 EMAS II.
Postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja je dokazal dobro delovanje teh sistemov.
The peer review process gave proof of the well functioning of these systems.
(20) „lokacija“ pomeni določen geografski prostor pod upravljavskim nadzorom organizacije, ki zajema dejavnosti, proizvode in storitve, vključno z vso infrastrukturo, opremo in materiali;
(20) "site" means a distinct geographic location under the management control of an organisation covering activities, products and services, including all infrastructure, equipment and materials;