natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice razmislijo o možnosti, da bi vnaprej pripravile objavo podatkov o „dobrih“ in „slabih“ dolžnikih, ter o razširjanju dobre prakse za spodbujanje pravočasnega plačevanja.
Member States shall consider the possibility of arranging for publication of information on 'good' and 'bad' debtors and disseminating good practices to promote punctuality of payment.
Kot je razvidno iz ocene učinka, ki jo je pripravila Komisija, podjetja ne zahtevajo zamudnih obresti tudi zato, ker se ne zavedajo svojih pravic.
As indicated in the Commission's impact assessment, undertakings do not demand interest partly because they are not aware of their rights.
Obveščanju bi bilo mogoče dodati praktične ukrepe, ki bi spodbujali pravočasno plačevanje.
In addition to providing information, practical measures can be taken to promote punctuality of payment.
Boj proti zamudam pri plačilih v trgovskih poslih (Prenovitev)
Combating late payment in commercial transactions (recast version)
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/15/ES o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Directive 2002/15/EC on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities
– ob upoštevanju člena 71 ter členov 137(2) in 251(2) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0354/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 71 and 137(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0354/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 294(3) ter 91 in 153(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and Articles 91 and 153(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve (A7 0137/2010),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A7‑0137/2010 ),
(i) Direktiva 2002/15/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu
(i) Directive 2002/15/ Ε C of the European Parliament and of the Council on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities
Ta direktiva je lex specialis Direktive 2003/88/ES o delovnem času in dopolnjuje Uredbo (ES) št. 561/2006 (UL E 102, 11.4.2006), ki določa skupna pravila o času vožnje in dolžini odmorov za voznike.
It is a lex specialis to the general Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC and supplements Regulation (EC) No. 561/2006 (OJ E 102, 11.4.2006) laying down common rules on driving times and rest periods for drivers.
Komisija je v skladu z Direktivo 2002/15/ES, zlasti z določbo, ki bi se od 23. marca 2009 uporabljala za samozaposlene voznike, Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložila poročilo (KOM(2007)266 končno) o možnih posledicah vključitve oziroma izvzetja samozaposlenih voznikov iz področja uporabe te direktive.
In accordance with Directive 2002/15/ΕC and in particular the provision that it would apply to self-employed drivers from 23 Μarch 2009, the Commission submitted to the European Parliament and the Council a report (CΟΜ (2007) 266 final) presenting the likely consequences of the inclusion or exclusion of self-employed drivers from the scope of the directive.
Ugotovitve so:
It found that:
(a) Ni bilo odločilnega razloga za vključitev samozaposlenih voznikov v področje uporabe direktive.
(a) There was not a decisive case for including self-employed drivers in the scope of the directive.
Spremeniti je treba zgolj opredelitev nočnega dela (člen 3(i) Direktive 2002/15/ES), saj bi glede na njeno sedanje besedilo zajemala tudi zelo kratek čas – le nekaj minut – nočnega dela.
(c) As regards night work, the Commission concluded that the provisions did not need to be amended or further harmonised; the definition of ‘night work’ (Article 3(i) of Directive 2002/15/EC) must merely be amended, since, as it is worded now, it would include even very short periods of night work, including periods of a few minutes only.
Komisija meni, da je ta predlog z ekonomskega in socialnega vidika nesorazmeren ter nepotreben.
According to the Commission, this proposal is economically and socially disproportionate and unnecessary.
(I Ι ) Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/15/ES o urejanju delovnega časa oseb, ki opravljajo spremljevalne dejavnosti v cestnem prometu (KOM(2008)650).
(I Ι ) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/15/EC on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (COM(2008)650).
Po posvetovanjih z zainteresiranimi stranmi in oceni učinka, da bi se izognili nepotrebnim upravnim obremenitvam ter obenem spodbudili uresničevanje ciljev prometne politike, se je izkazalo, da je obravnavani predlog spremembe Direktive 2002/15/ES najboljša politična možnost.
After stakeholder consultations and an impact assessment with a view to avoiding unnecessary administrative burden and at the same time promoting the EU transport policy objectives, the proposal under review amending Directive 2002/15/ΕC was considered the best policy option.
Po mnenju Komisije ostaja splošni cilj direktive – varovanje zdravja in varnosti delavcev v cestnem prometu – nespremenjen, izkrivljanje konkurence ter upravni in ekonomski stroški za države članice pa so manjši.
According to the Commission, there has been no change in the overall purpose of the directive, namely protection of the health and safety of road transport workers, while distortions in competition and administrative and economic costs for Member States are reduced.
– Direktiva se uporablja za vse vozno osebje in tiste delavce, ki ne morejo sami urejati svojih poklicnih dejavnosti, tj. za lažne samozaposlene voznike (člena 2(1) in 3(d)).
- Application of directive to all mobile workers and those who are not free to organise their working activities, namely the ‘false’ self-employed drivers (Article 2, paragraph 1, Article 3, paragraph (d));
– Črta se opredelitev delovnega časa za samozaposlene voznike, doda pa se natančnejša opredelitev voznega osebja.
- Deletion of the definition of ‘working time’ for self-employed drivers and a more precise definition of ‘mobile workers’ is added.
– Člen 11(a) (novo) uvaja skupna načela za zagotovitev boljše preglednosti in učinkovitosti izvrševanja v državah članicah.
- Article 11(a) (new) introduces common principles designed to ensure greater transparency and effectiveness of national enforcement regimes.
– Poziva se k tesnejšemu sodelovanju med izvršilnimi organi držav članic.
- Closer cooperation is called for between Member States’ enforcement authorities.
– Predlaga se tudi podpora Komisije za omogočanje dialoga med pristojnimi organi.
- Commission support is also proposed to facilitate the dialogue between the bodies concerned.
– Poleg ukrepov za strukturno posodobitev poročevalka priznava, da je pojav lažno samozaposlenih delavcev splošna težava na trgu delovne sile, zato ga je treba primerno obravnavati.
- Apart from structural updating measures, your rapporteur recognises a danger that the phenomenon of ‘false’ self-employed workers is a general problem of the labour market and should be addressed as such.
– Prepričana je, da za urejanje delovnega časa samozaposlenih delavcev ni precedensa in da bi lahko imele zakonodajne težnje v tej smeri daljnosežne posledice.
- Your rapporteur is convinced that regulation of working time of self-employed is unprecedent and the legislation in this direction would have far-reaching consequences.
– Poziva k lažjemu in boljšemu dostopu do informacij o socialni zakonodaji na področju cestnega prometa.
- She calls for the facilitation and improvement of access to information concerning social legislation in the field of road transport.
o uresničevanju sinergij med sredstvi za raziskave in inovacije iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj ter Sedmim okvirnim programom za raziskave in razvoj v mestih in regijah ter državah članicah in Uniji
on the implementation of the synergies of research and innovation earmarked Funds in Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 concerning the European Fund of Regional Development and the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development in cities and regions as well as in the Member States and the Union
Jorgo Chatzimarkakis , Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko
Jorgo Chatzimarkakis , Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
(*) Pridruženi odbori – člen 50 poslovnika
(*) Associated committee – Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko Error!
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............17
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti naslovov XVII, XVIII in XIX Pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Titles XVII, XVIII and XIX thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/ 2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta št. 2006/702/ES z dne 6. oktobra 2006 o strateških smernicah Skupnosti o koheziji
– having regard to Council Decision of 6 October 2006 on Community strategic guidelines on cohesion (2006/702/EC)
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 1639/2006/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o ustanovitvi Okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (2007–2013)
– having regard to Decision No 1639/2006/ΕC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013)
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. maja 2007 o prispevku prihodnje regionalne politike k inovativnim zmogljivostim Evropske unije
– having regard to its resolution of 10 May 2007 on the contribution of the future regional policy to the innovative capacity of the European Union
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0184 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0184 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. maja 2007 o prenosu znanja v prakso: široko zastavljena inovacijska strategija za EU
– having regard to its resolution of 24 May 2007 on putting knowledge into practice: a broad-based innovation strategy for Europe
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0212 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0212 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2009 o zeleni knjigi o teritorialni koheziji in napredku razprav o prihodnji reformi kohezijske politike
– having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2009 on the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion and the state of the debate on the future reform of cohesion policy
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0163 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0163 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. marca 2009 o najboljši praksi na področju regionalne politike in ovirah za uporabo sredstev iz strukturnih skladov
– having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2009 on best practices in the field of regional policy and obstacles to the use of the Structural Funds
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0156 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0156 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2009 o izvajanju uredbe o strukturnih skladih 2007–2013: rezultati pogajanj glede nacionalnih kohezijskih strategij in operativnih programov
– having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2009 on the implementation of the Structural Funds Regulation 2007-2013: the results of the negotiations on the national cohesion strategies and the operational programmes
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0165 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0165 . ,
– ob upoštevanju študije, ki jo je objavil Evropski parlament, z naslovom „Sinergije med sedmim okvirnim raziskovalnim programom, Okvirnim programom za konkurenčnost in inovativnost ter strukturnimi skladi EU“,
– having regard to the study published by the European Parliament entitled ‘Synergies between the EU 7th Research Framework Programme, the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme and the Structural Funds’,
– ob upoštevanju študije, ki jo je objavil Evropski parlament, z naslovom „Teritorializaciji evropskih politik na področju raziskav in razvoja ter inovacij naproti“,
– having regard to the study published by the European Parliament entitled ‘Moving towards a territorialisation of European R&D and Innovation policies’,
– ob upoštevanju študije, ki jo je objavil Evropski parlament, z naslovom „Podpora strukturnih skladov na področju inovacij – izzivi pri izvajanju v obdobju od leta 2007 do 2013 in naprej“,
– having regard to the study published by the European Parliament entitled ‘Structural Funds’ support for innovation – implementation challenges for 2007 - 2013 and beyond’,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. avgusta 2007 z naslovom „Z raziskavami in inovacijami do konkurenčnih evropskih regij – prispevek k večji rasti ter k povečanju števila in kakovosti delovnih mest“ ( KOM(2007)0474 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication of 16 August 2007 entitled ‘Competitive European regions through research and innovation – a contribution to more growth and more and better jobs’ ( COM(2007)0474 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. decembra 2007 o lizbonski strategiji za rast in delovna mesta, ki jo države članice in regije izvajajo v okviru kohezijske politike EU v obdobju 2007–2013 ( KOM(2007)0798 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Communication of 11 December 2007 on Member States and Regions delivering the Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs through EU cohesion policy, 2007-2013 ( COM(2007)0798 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 14. maja 2008 o rezultatih pogajanj glede strategij in programov kohezijske politike za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 ( KOM(2008)0301 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Communication of 14 May 2008 on the results of the negotiations concerning cohesion policy strategies and programmes for the programming period 2007 -2013 ( COM(2008)0301 ),
– ob upoštevanju 20. letnega poročila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2009 o izvajanju strukturnih skladov (2008) ( KOM(2009)0617 ),
– having regard to the 20th annual report of the Commission of 21 December 2009 on implementation of the structural funds (2008) ( COM(2009)0617 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 14. novembra 2007 o inovacijah, ki jih regije izvajajo v okviru kohezijske politike ( SEC(2007)1547 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Staff Working Document of 14 November 2007 on regions delivering innovation through cohesion policy ( SEC(2007)1547 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 24. novembra 2009 o posvetovanju o prihodnji strategiji „EU 2020“ ( KOM(2009)0647 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Working Document of 24 November 2009 on consultation on the future ‘EU2020’ strategy ( COM(2009)0647 )
– ob upoštevanju petega poročila Komisije z dne 19. junija 2008 o napredku na področju gospodarske in socialne kohezije – Rastoče regije, rastoča Evropa ( KOM(2008)0371 ) (Peto poročilo o napredku),
– having regard to the Commission’s fifth progress report of 19 June 2008 on economic and social cohesion – Growing regions, growing Europe ( COM(2008)0371 ) (Fifth Progress Report);
– ob upoštevanju šestega poročila Komisije z dne 25. junija 2009 o napredku na področju gospodarske in socialne kohezije – Ustvarjalne in inovativne regije ( KOM(2009)0295 ) (Šesto poročilo o napredku),
– having regard to the Commission’s sixth progress report of 25 June 2009 on economic and social cohesion – Creative and innovative regions ( COM(2009)0295 ) (Sixth Progress Report);
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Odbora za znanstvene in tehnološke raziskave z dne 4. decembra 2006 o poročilu z naslovom „Izkušnje za politike raziskav in razvoja na podlagi nacionalnih programov reform in poročil o napredku za leto 2006“ (CREST 1211/06),
– having regard to the note of the Scientific and Technical Research Committee (Crest) of 4 December 2006 on the report entitled ‘Lessons for R&D policies on the basis of the national reform programmes and the 2006 Progress Reports’ (CREST1211/06);
– ob upoštevanju navodil Komisije z naslovom „Z raziskavami in inovacijami do konkurenčnih evropskih regij – praktična navodila glede možnosti financiranja raziskav in inovacij v EU“,
– having regard to the Commission’s guide entitled ‘Competitive European regions through research and innovation - Practical Guide to EU funding Opportunities for Research and Innovation’;
– ob upoštevanju poročila Evropskega strateškega foruma o raziskovalnih infrastrukturah z naslovom „Poročilo o evropskem zemljevidu raziskovalnih infrastruktur 2006“,
– having regard to the report of the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures, entitled ‘European Roadmap for Research Infrastructures Report 2006’;
– ob upoštevanju neodvisnega poročila, pripravljenega na prošnjo Komisije o agendi za reformo kohezijske politike (poročilo Fabrizia Barce) (2009),
– having regard to the independent report, prepared at the request of the Commission, entitled ‘An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy’ (Fabrizio Barca report) (2009);
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7–0138/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7‑0138/2010 ),
A. ker prenovljena lizbonska strategija postavlja v ospredje raziskave in inovacije kot odgovor na izzive, kot so podnebne spremembe in vse večja globalna konkurenca; ker je v obdobju po krizi postalo spodbujanje rasti in ustvarjanja delovnih mest z raziskavami in inovacijami še bolj pomembno in je ključni cilj predlagane strategije EU 2020,
A. whereas the renewed Lisbon strategy gives high priority to research and innovation so as to respond to challenges such as climate change and increasing global competition; whereas in the post-crisis era stimulating growth and jobs through research and innovation has become ever more important, constituting a core target of the proposed EU 2020 Strategy,
B. ker je izvajanje raziskav in inovacij pomembno za vse družbene sloje in mora biti njihov namen izboljšati socialni in ekonomski položaj ljudi;
B. whereas the implementation of research and innovation is a need shared by all strata of society and its purpose must be to improve people’s social and economic conditions;
C. ker se evropska podpora raziskavam in inovacijam zagotavlja zlasti iz raziskovalne, inovacijske in kohezijske politike, katerih osrednji instrumenti so strukturni skladi, Sedmi okvirni program za raziskave ter Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost,
C. whereas European support for research and innovation is primarily provided through research, innovation and cohesion policy, the main instruments of these being the Structural Funds, the Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7) and the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP),
D. ker je kohezijska politika bistveni steber v procesu evropske integracije in ena od najuspešnejših politik EU, ki prispeva k zbliževanju vse bolj raznolikih regij ter spodbuja rast in zaposlovanje,
D. whereas cohesion policy is an essential pillar in the process of European integration and one of the most successful EU policies, facilitating convergence between increasingly diverse regions and stimulating growth and employment,
E. ker so inovacije najbolj učinkovito obravnavane na regionalni ravni z bližino akterjev, kot so univerze, javne raziskovalne organizacije in industrija, ki spodbujajo partnerstvo pri prenosu znanja in izmenjavo dobrih praks med regijami,
E. whereas innovation is most effectively addressed at regional level with the proximity of actors, such as universities, public research organisations or industry, promoting partnerships in knowledge transfer, and the exchange of good practices between regions;
F. ker se druga strateška smernica Skupnosti o koheziji za obdobje 2007–2013 nanaša na izboljšanje znanja in inovativnosti za rast in je bilo zato v proračunu predvidenih 25 % skupnih dodeljenih sredstev,
F. whereas the second Community Strategic Guideline on cohesion for the period 2007-2013 refers to improving knowledge and innovation for growth, and consequently 25% of the total allocation has been budgeted,
G. ker je zaradi kompleksnosti današnjih izzivov potrebna kombinacija teh politik; ker družba znanja zahteva več kot le kopičenje dejavnosti različnih sektorjev, je bistvenega pomena sinergija med akterji in instrumenti, da lahko drug drugega krepijo in podpirajo trajnostno uresničevanje raziskovalnih in inovacijskih projektov, s tem pa prispevajo k višjemu vrednotenju rezultatov raziskav v obliki idej za konkretne izdelke v regijah,
G. whereas the complexity of today’s challenges calls for an integrated mix of these policies; whereas the knowledge society requires, more than just an aggregation of the activities of the different sectors, a synergy between agents and instruments, which is vital so that they reinforce each other and support the sustainable implementation of research and innovation projects, delivering a better valorisation of research outcomes in the form of concrete product ideas in the regions;
H. ker nekateri elementi teh instrumentov, denimo isti časovni okvir in usklajenost z lizbonsko strategijo, sicer omogočajo sinergijo, vendar so še vedno razlike, denimo različne pravne podlage, vsebinska oziroma območna usmerjenost in deljeno oziroma centralizirano upravljanje,
H. whereas, while some elements of the architecture of these instruments, such as the same time frame and alignment with the Lisbon agenda, allow for synergies, there are still differences, such as different legal bases, thematic versus territorial focus, and shared versus centralised management,
Prispevek kohezijske politike k ciljem na področju raziskav in inovacij
Cohesion Policy delivering research and innovation objectives
2. pozdravlja nove načine financiranja in opozarja na možnosti pobude JEREMIE in Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja Komisije in skupine Evropske investicijske banke pri povečevanju finančnih priložnostih za inovativna podjetja; priporoča, naj regionalni akterji poleg financiranja iz strukturnih skladov izkoristijo te nove priložnosti; pri tem poudarja, da je treba učinkovito usklajevati javne in zasebne naložbe;
Welcomes the fact that new financing methods exist and underlines the potential of the JEREMIE initiative and the Risk Sharing Finance Facility of the Commission and the European Investment Bank Group in boosting financing opportunities for innovative enterprises; recommends that regional actors exploit these new opportunities complementarily to Structural Funds financing; stresses in this context the need to effectively coordinate public and private investments;
6. opozarja na številne možnosti za razvoj in inovacije v mestih; meni, da bi pametnejša urbanistična politika, ki bi temeljila na tehnološkem napredku in upoštevala, da 80 % prebivalstva Evrope živi v mestih kjer najdemo tudi največje socialne razlike, prispevala k trajnostni gospodarski rasti; zato poziva k vključitvi urbane dimenzije v nadaljnjo kohezijsko politiko;
Highlights the great potential of cities in pursuing research and innovation; believes that smarter urban policy, based on technological advancements and addressing the fact that 80% of Europe’s population lives in towns, which is also where the greatest social disparities are, would contribute to sustainable economic growth; therefore calls for incorporating the urban dimension in future cohesion policy;
Sinergije med strukturnimi skladi, sedmim okvirnim programom ter programom za konkurenčnost in inovativnost
Synergies between Structural Funds, FP7 and CIP