natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
d) zagotovijo, da so podatki, ki jih navedejo ob registraciji in nato v okviru svojih dejavnosti iz področja uporabe registra, po njihovem najboljšem vedenju natančni, najnovejši in nezavajajoči;
d) ensure that, to the best of their knowledge, information which they provide upon registration and subsequently in the framework of their activities within the scope of the register is complete, up-to-date and not misleading;
e) tretjim stranem ne smejo prodajati kopij dokumentov, ki so jih pridobili od katere koli institucije EU;
e) not sell to third parties copies of documents obtained from any EU institution;
f) ne smejo napeljevati članov institucij EU, uradnikov ali ostalega osebja EU, pomočnikov ali praktikantov omenjenih članov h kršitvam pravil in meril obnašanja, ki zanje veljajo;
f) not induce Members of the EU institutions, officials or other staff of the EU, or assistants or trainees of those Members, to contravene the rules and standards of behaviour applicable to them;
g) če zaposlijo nekdanje uradnike ali ostalo osebje EU ali pomočnike ali praktikante članov institucij EU, upoštevajo, da so ti zaposleni dolžni spoštovati zanje veljavna pravila in zahteve po zaupnosti;
g) if employing former officials or other staff of the EU or assistants or trainees of Members of the EU institutions, respect the obligation of such employees to abide by the rules and confidentiality requirements which apply to them;
h) spoštujejo vsa pravila o pravicah in odgovornostih nekdanjih poslancev Evropskega parlamenta in članov Evropske komisije;
h) observe any rules laid down on the rights and responsibilities of former Members of the European Parliament and the European Commission;
i) obvestijo vsakogar, ki ga predstavljajo, o svojih obveznostih do institucij EU;
i) inform whomever they represent of their obligations towards the EU institutions;
Posamezniki, ki predstavljajo ali delajo za subjekte, registrirane pri Evropskem parlamentu z namenom izdaje poimenske, neprenosljive izkaznice za vstop v poslopja Evropskega parlamenta, upoštevajo naslednje:
Individuals representing or working for entities which have registered with the European Parliament with a view to being issued with a personal, non-transferable badge affording access to Parliament’s premises shall:
j) strogo spoštujejo določbe iz člena 9 in Priloge X ter drugi odstavek člena 2 Priloge I Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta;
j) comply strictly with the provisions of Rule 9 of, and Annex X and the second paragraph of Article 2 of Annex I to, the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure;
k) zagotovijo, da je vsaka pomoč v smislu člena 2 Priloge I Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta vpisana v ustrezni register;
k) satisfy themselves that any assistance provided in the context of Article 2 of Annex I to the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure is declared in the appropriate register;
l) da bi se izognili morebitnim navzkrižjem interesov, pridobijo predhodno soglasje zadevnega poslanca ali poslancev Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi s katerim koli pogodbenim razmerjem ali zaposlitvijo pomočnika poslanca, ter nato to vpisati v register.
l) in order to avoid possible conflicts of interest, obtain the prior consent of the Member or Members of the European Parliament concerned as regards any contractual relationship with or employment of a Member's assistant, and subsequently declare this in the register.
Dodatek 4
Annex 4
1. faza: vloga pritožbe
Stage 1: Submitting a complaint
Točka (d) zahteva od registracijskih zavezancev, da v svojih odnosih z institucijami EU, njihovimi člani, uradniki in ostalim osebjem "zagotovijo, da so informacije, ki jih navedejo ob registraciji in nato v okviru svojih dejavnosti iz področja uporabe registra, po njihovem najboljšem vedenju natančne, najnovejše in nezavajajoče;" .
That point (d) requires registrants, in their relations with the EU institutions and their Members, officials and other staff, to "ensure that, to the best of their knowledge, information which they provide upon registration and subsequently in the framework of their activities within the scope of the register is complete, up-to-date and not misleading". .
2 faza: sklep o upravičenosti
Stage 2: Decision on admissibility
Skupni sekretariat registra:
The joint Register Secretariat shall:
(a) preveri, ali je pritožba podprta z dovolj dokazi, v obliki dokumentov, dokazov ali osebnih izjav; za dopustnost dokaznega materiala je načeloma potrebno, da izvirajo iz obtožene organizacije ali iz dokumentov tretje strani;
(a) verify that sufficient evidence is adduced to support the complaint, whether this takes the form of documents, other materials or personal statements; to be admissible, material evidence should in principle be sourced either from the registrant complained about or from a document issued by a third party;
(b) na podlagi tega preverjanja odloči, ali je pritožba upravičena;
(b) on the basis of such verification, decide on the admissibility of the complaint;
(c) če meni, da je pritožba upravičena, registrira pritožbo in določi rok (20 delovnih dni) za sklep o utemeljenosti pritožbe.
(c) if it deems the complaint admissible, register the complaint and fix a deadline (20 working days) for the decision on the validity of the complaint.
O odločitvi, da pritožba ni dopustna, se pritožnik pisno obvesti, v pismu pa se navedejo razlogi za takšno odločitev.
If the complaint is deemed inadmissible, the complainant shall be informed by letter, which shall state the reasons for the decision.
Če se zdi pritožba upravičena, se razišče v skladu s postopkom, določenim v nadaljevanju.
If the complaint is deemed admissible, it shall be investigated in accordance with the procedure set out below.
3 faza: Preiskava
Stage 3: Investigation
Po registraciji pritožbe skupni sekretariat registra pisno obvesti registracijskega zavezanca o pritožbi zoper tega registracijskega zavezanca in njeni vsebini, ter ga pozove, naj v 10 delovnih dneh poda razlago, argumente ali druge elemente v svoj zagovor.
After registering the complaint, the joint Register Secretariat shall inform the registrant in writing of the complaint made against that registrant and the content of that complaint, and shall invite the registrant to present explanations, arguments or other elements of defence within 10 working days.
Vse podatke, zbrane med preiskavo, preuči skupni sekretariat registra.
All information collected during the investigation shall be examined by the joint Register Secretariat.
Skupni sekretariat registra lahko sklene zaslišati registracijskega zavezanca, proti kateremu je bila podana pritožba, ali pritožnika.
The joint Register Secretariat may decide to hear the registrant complained about, or the complainant.
4 faza: sklep o pritožbi
Stage 4: Decision on the complaint
Če se v preiskavi izkaže, da je pritožba neutemeljena, skupni sekretariat registra obe strani obvesti o tej odločitvi.
If the investigation shows the complaint to be unfounded, the joint Register Secretariat shall inform both parties of the decision to that effect.
Če je pritožba utemeljena, se zadevni registracijski zavezanec lahko začasno izključi iz registra, dokler se problem ne reši (glej odstavke 11 do 14 v nadaljevanju), ali se lahko proti njemu izvede vrsta ukrepov, od dolgoročne začasne izključitve do dokončne izključitve iz registra in po potrebi odvzema izkaznic za vstop v Evropski parlament (glej stopnji 6 in 7 v nadaljevanju).
If the complaint is upheld, the registrant may be temporarily suspended from the register pending the taking of steps to address the problem (see paragraphs 11 to 14 below) or may be subject to measures ranging from long-term suspension from the register to exclusion from the register and withdrawal, where applicable, of any badge affording access to the European Parliament (see stages 6 and 7 below).
5. faza: ukrepi v primeru neskladnosti s pravili ravnanja
Stage 5: Measures in the event of non-compliance with the code of conduct
V primeru neskladnosti s pravili ravnanja iz drugih razlogov se registracija zadevnega registracijskega zavezanca začasno izključi za obdobje osmih tednov, v tem času pa Evropska komisija in Evropski parlament sprejmeta dokončen sklep o uvedenem morebitnem ukrepu.
In the event of non-compliance with the code of conduct on other grounds, the registration of the registrant in question shall be suspended for a period of eight weeks, during which time the European Commission and the European Parliament shall take the final decision on the measure or measures, if any, to be imposed.
6. faza: sklep o ukrepu, ki naj se izvede
Stage 6: Decision on the measure to be applied
Skupni sekretariat registra nemudoma obvesti obe strani (pritožnika in registracijskega zavezanca, proti kateremu je bila podana pritožba) o sprejetem ukrepu in ukrep izvede.
The joint Register Secretariat shall immediately inform both parties (the complainant and the registrant against which the complaint was made) of the measure decided upon, and shall implement that measure.
7. faza: odvzem (če je potrebno) izkaznic za vstop v Evropski parlament
Stage 7: Withdrawal (if applicable) of the badge(s) affording access to the European Parliament
Zaznamek ukrepa v registru
Mention of measure in the register
Odvzem izkaznic za vstop v EP
EP access badge withdrawn
Nenamerna neskladnost, ki se nemudoma popravi
Unintentional non-compliance, immediately corrected
Pisno obvestilo z navedbo neskladnosti in njenih popravkov
Written notification acknowledging the facts and their correction
Namerna neskladnost s pravili, zaradi katere je treba spremeniti ravnanje ali popraviti podatke v registru v določenem roku
Deliberate non-compliance with the code, necessitating a change of behaviour or rectification of data in the register within the deadline laid down
Začasna izključitev do šestih mesecev ali dokler se ne zaključi zahtevani popravni ukrep v določenem roku
Temporary suspension for up to six months or until such time as the corrective action requested is completed within the deadline set
Da, za obdobje začasne izključitve
Yes during the suspension period
Vztrajna neskladnost s pravili
Persistent non-compliance with the code
– ravnanje se ne spremeni
– no change of behaviour
– podatki se ne popravijo v določenem roku
– failure to correct data within the deadline laid down
Izbris za eno leto
Removal from the register for one year
Resna, namerna neskladnost s pravili
Serious, deliberate non-compliance with the code
Izbris iz registra za dve leti
Removal from the register for two years
Preglednost političnih institucij je pogoj za njihovo legitimnost.
Transparency of political institutions is a prerequisite for legitimacy.
Parlament je po več poročilih in temeljitih razpravah leta 1996 vzpostavil svoj register zastopnikov interesov.
After several reports and thorough discussions the Parliament launched its register for interest representatives in 1996.
Stubb-Friedrich ovo poročilo
Stubb-Friedrich report
Komisija je leta 2006 predstavila pobudo za preglednost v Evropi, v kateri je predlagala skupni register „vse na enem mestu“ za lobiste pri Komisiji in Parlamentu.
In 2006 the Commission gave out a "European Transparency Initiative" where it proposed a common "one-stop-shop" register for the lobbyists in the Commission and Parliament.
Parlament je na to pobudo Komisije odgovoril s poročilom Odbora za ustavne zadeve o pripravi okvira za dejavnosti zastopnikov interesov (lobistov) v institucijah Evropske unije.
Parliament's answer to this Commission initiative was the report by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the Development of the framework for the activities of interest representatives (lobbyists) in the European institutions.
Poročevalec je bil finski poslanec Alexander Stubb (Evropska ljudska stranka), poročilo pa je potem, ko je bil le-ta imenovan za finskega zunanjega ministra, prevzel nemški poslanec Ingo Friedrich (Evropska ljudska stranka).
The rapporteur was Alexander Stubb (PPE, FI), but after he had been nominated to Foreign Minister of Finland, the report was taken over by Ingo Friedrich (PPE, DE).
Resolucija je bila sprejeta na plenarnem zasedanju 8. maja 2008.
The resolution was adopted in the plenary on 8 May 2008.
Resolucija pozdravlja predlog Komisije in poziva k medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu o skupnem registru Parlamenta, Komisije in Sveta.
The resolution welcomes the Commission's proposal and calls for an interinstitutional agreement on a common register between Parliament, the Commission and the Council.
Komisijo poziva, naj se s Parlamentom pogaja o skupnem kodeksu ravnanja za lobiste, in poudarja, da bi se morale kazni (v resnih primerih izbris iz registra) uporabljati za vse lobiste, ki kršijo kodeks.
It asks the Commission to negotiate with Parliament on common code of conduct for the lobbyists and stresses that sanctions (in serious cases removal from the register) should apply to lobbyists who have breached the code.
Resolucija predlaga oblikovanje skupne delovne skupine vseh treh institucij na visoki ravni za vzpostavitev skupnega registra.
The resolution proposes a joint high level working group of all three institutions to consider the setting up of a joint register.
Delovna skupina na visoki ravni
The joint high level working group
Novembra 2008 je bila ustanovljena takšna delovna skupina Parlamenta in Komisije, Svet pa je menil, da njegovo sodelovanje ni potrebno.
Such a working group was established in November 2008 between the Parliament and the Commission - the Council has not seen necessary to participate.
Delovna skupina je aprila 2009 sprejela skupno izjavo in predlagala skupni kodeks ravnanja.
The working group adopted in April 2009 a joint declaration and a proposal for a common code of conduct.
Po volitvah v Evropski parlament je bila oblikovana nova delovna skupina Parlamenta in Komisije.
After the European elections a new working group was set up between the Parliament and the Commission.
Delegacijo Evropskega parlamenta je vodila podpredsednica Diana Wallis, člani pa so bili Carlo Casini, Isabelle Durant in Jo Leinen.
The EP delegation was led by Vice President Diana Wallis with Carlo Casini, Isabelle Durant and Jo Leinen as members.
Delovna skupina je novembra 2010 sprejela osnutek sporazuma o vzpostavitvi registra o preglednosti.
The working group was able to adopt in November 2010 a draft agreement on the establishment of a "Transparency Register".
Parlament je dosegel svoje bistvene cilje
Parliament achieved its essential targets
Dosežki ustrezajo ciljem, ki jih je Parlament določil v najbolj bistvenih točkah:
The achieved result corresponds to the objectives laid out by the Parliament in the most essential points:
Čeprav registracija ni obvezna – kar je bil cilj Parlamenta, je mogoče ugotoviti, da je dejansko obvezna, saj je stalen dostop v prostore Parlamenta dovoljen samo registriranim zastopnikom interesov.
Although the registration is not obligatory - which was the target of the Parliament - it can be considered as "obligatory de facto" because the permanent access to the Parliament premises is allowed only to the registered interest representatives.
Skupni register zagotavlja najširšo udeležbo vseh kategorij izvajalcev, obenem pa spoštuje njihove različne ali posebne identitete.
The common register ensures the widest participation of all categories of operators while respecting their different or specific identities.
Zaradi novega imena (register o preglednosti) se vanj lažje vpišejo nekomercialne organizacije.
The new name "Transparency register" makes it easier for non-commercial organizations to join the register.
Novi mehanizem zagotavlja dodatne informacije o številu posameznikov, ki sodelujejo v vseh dejavnostih, povezanih z registrom, in o ravni sredstev EU, ki jih je prejel registracijski zavezanec.
The new mechanism provides additional information such as the number of individuals involved in all the activities relating to the register, and the level of EU resources received by the registrant.
Nudil bo pojasnila o upravičenih dejavnostih, ki spadajo na področje registra, in postopkih, ki se bodo uporabljali za obravnavo pritožb.
It will also provide clarifications regarding the eligible activities falling under the scope of the register, and the processes by which complaints will be handled.
Poročevalec je pripravljen priporočiti sprejetje osnutka sporazuma o vzpostavitvi registra o preglednosti.
The rapporteur is ready to recommend the adoption of the draft agreement on the establishment of a Transparency Register.
Skupni register bo korak k večji preglednosti v evropskih institucijah, kar bo morda prispevalo k večji legitimnosti evropskega projekta med državljani EU.
The joint register will be a step forward towards greater transparency in the European institutions, which hopefully will contribute to greater legitimacy of the European project among its citizens.
o BDP in več – merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja
on GDP and beyond – Measuring progress in a changing world
Pripravljavec mnenja (*): Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve
Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Nikolaos Chountis, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (*) ........9
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................18
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............18
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................23
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............23
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................27
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................28
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o BDP in več – merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja z dne 20. avgusta 2009 ( KOM(2009)0433 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 20 August 2009 on GDP and Beyond – Measuring progress in a changing world ( COM(2009)0433 ),
– ob upoštevanju konference o preseganju BDP, ki so jo organizirali Parlament, Komisija, Rimski klub, Svetovni sklad za naravo (WWF) in Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) novembra 2007 v Bruslju,
– having regard to the ‘Beyond GDP Conference’ organised by Parliament, the Commission, the Club of Rome, the WWF and the OECD in November 2007 in Brussels,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o merjenju gospodarske uspešnosti in družbenega napredka (Stiglitzevo poročilo), ki je bilo predstavljeno 14. septembra 2009,
– having regard to the report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (Stiglitz Report), presented on 14 September 2009,
– ob upoštevanju globalne pobude z naslovom Ekonomika ekosistemov in biotska raznovrstnost (TEEB), ki so jo junija 2007 predlagali voditelji skupine držav G8 in še voditelji petih drugih držav, ter njenih rezultatov, objavljenih v letih 2009 in 2010,
– having regard to the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) global initiative endorsed by G8+5 leaders in June 2007 and its results published in 2009 and 2010,
– ob upoštevanju Sternovega poročila o ekonomiki podnebnih sprememb, ki je bilo objavljeno 30. oktobra 2006,
– having regard to the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change published on 30 October 2006,
– ob upoštevanju istanbulske deklaracije, podpisane na drugem svetovnem forumu OECD o statistiki, znanju in politiki z dne 30. junija 2007,
– having regard to the Istanbul Declaration signed during the 2nd OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy on 30 June 2007,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dni 10. in 11. decembra 2009, 25. in 26. marca 2010 in 17. junija 2010,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 10 and 11 December 2009, 25 and 26 March 2010 and 17 June 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o statistiki (Ekonomske in finančne zadeve) z dne 10. novembra 2009,
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 10 November 2009 (Economic and Financial Affairs) on Statistics,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2009 (okolje) o ekološko učinkovitem gospodarstvu v okviru lizbonske agende po letu 2010 in strategije EU za trajnostni razvoj,
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 23 October 2009 (Environment) on Eco-Efficient Economy in the context of the post-2010 Lisbon Agenda and the EU Sustainable Development Strategy,
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za uredbo o evropskih okoljsko-gospodarskih računih ( KOM(2010)0132 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal for a Regulation on European Environmental Economic Accounts (COM (2010)0132),
– ob upoštevanju integriranih smernic strategije EU 2020 za evropske politike na področju gospodarstva in zaposlovanja, ki jih je Komisija predlagala 27. aprila 2010,
– having regard to the EU 2020 integrated guidelines for European economic and employment policies, proposed by the Commission on 27 April 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sporočil o evropski upravi: Boljša priprava zakonodaje ( KOM(2002)0275 ), Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0689 ), Drugi strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2008)0032 ) in Tretji strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2009)0015 ),
– having regard to the Communications on European Governance: Better lawmaking ( COM(2002)0275 ), A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union ( COM(2006)0689 ), A second strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union ( COM(2008)0032 ) and A third strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union ( COM(2009)0015 ),
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta za trajnostno potrošnjo in proizvodnjo ( KOM(2008)0397 ),
– having regard to the EU’s Sustainable Consumption and Production Action Plan (COM (2008)0397),
– ob upoštevanju obstoječih statističnih instrumentov kot so Statistika Evropske unije o dohodkih in življenjskih pogojih, anketa o delovni sili, raziskave Eurobarometra, anketa o evropskih vrednotah in Evropski družbeni pregled,
– having regard to existing statistical instruments, such as the EU-SILC, the Labour Force Survey (LFS), Eurobarometers, the European Values Survey and the European Social Survey (ESS),
– ob upoštevanju evropske raziskave o kakovosti življenja, ki jo vodi Eurofund in zagotavlja celostno sliko o kakovosti življenja in življenjskih pogojih v evropskih državah (za vse države članice EU in njene kandidatke) z več kot 120 kazalniki s primerjalnimi podatki med državami
– having regard to the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS), coordinated by Eurofound, which provides a comprehensive portrait of quality of life and living conditions in European Countries (covering all EU Member States and candidate countries) with over 120 indicators providing comparative data across countries
Raziskava o kakovosti življenja pokriva bistvena področja pojma kakovosti življenja: gospodarski viri, prikrajšanje; zdravje in dostop do zdravstvene nege; zaposlovanje in kakovost delovnih mest; ravnovesje med delom in zasebnim življenjem; družinski odnosi in podpora; socialna vključenost/izključenost (življenje v skupnosti in družbena udeležba); izobraževanje in usposabljanje; kakovost stanovanj in lokalno okolje; družbeni kapital in kakovost družbe; kakovost javnih storitev; subjektivna blaginja (vključno s srečo, zadovoljstvom z življenjem, optimizmom glede prihodnosti). ,
EQLS covers the following core domains of the quality of life concept: economic resources, deprivation; health and access to health care; employment and job quality; work-life balance; family relations and support; social inclusion/exclusion (community life and social participation); education and training; quality of housing and local environment; social capital and quality of society; quality of public services; subjective well-being (including happiness, life satisfaction, optimism about the future). ,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dni 10. marca
– having regard to its resolutions of 10 March
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0053 . in 16. junija 2010
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0053 . and 16 June 2010