natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
167. ugotavlja, da so bili, na podlagi določenega števila napovedi ("najboljše ocene"), skupni stroški kontrol, ki jih je izvedel Generalni direktorat za humanitarno pomoč (ECHO), ocenjeni na 25.000.000 EUR za leto 2007, to predstavlja 3,2 % vseh sredstev za humanitarno pomoč za to leto; obžaluje odsotnost mehanizma za upravljanje tveganj v generalnem direktoratu za humanitarno pomoč (ECHO) in zahteva, da se te mehanizme sistematično vključi v kontrolo;
Notes that, on the basis of a number of hypotheses ('best estimates'), the total cost of the checks carried out by the Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid (DG ECHO) has been put at EUR 25 000 000 for the financial year 2007, this being equivalent to 3.2% of the total humanitarian assistance budget for that year; deplores the lack of procedures for risk management by DG ECHO and calls for such procedures systematically to be incorporated into the control arrangements;
171. obžaluje, da je Komisija Keniji nakazala denarno pomoč ravno po volitvah 27. decembra 2007, in je tako dajala vtis, da sodeluje v razpravi o legitimnosti volilnih izidov; opozarja na svojo resolucijo z dne 17. januarja 2008 o Keniji
Regrets that in Kenya the Commission disbursed budgetary support straight after the elections of 27 December 2007, thus giving the impression of taking sides in the debate on the legitimacy of the election results; recalls its resolution of 17 January 2008 on Kenya
Sprejeta besedila tega dne, P6_TA(2008)0018 . in pričakuje, da jo bo Komisija upoštevala;
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0018 . , and looks to the Commission to take due account thereof;
174. poziva Komisijo, naj nadalje izboljša in bolj jasno opredeli pogoje in kazalnike uspešnosti, uporabljene za izplačilo proračunske podpore tretjim državam, da bi tako določila jasna, nedvoumna in izmerljiva ocenjevalna merila z določenim časovnim okvirom, če je to ustrezno;
Calls on the Commission to further improve, and to define more clearly, the conditions and performance indicators used for the disbursement of budgetary support to third countries, so as to provide for clear, unambiguous and measurable assessment criteria with a specific timetable, if applicable;
UL C 285, 27.11.2007, str.
OJ C 285, 27.11.2007, p.
179. ponavlja svojo zahtevo, naj Komisija Parlamentu redno predstavlja posebne ukrepe za nadaljnje povečanje odgovornosti Evropske unije za njene zunanje dejavnostmi v njihovem geografskem okviru v skladu z načeli učinkovitosti, odgovornosti in vidnosti;
Reiterates its request that the Commission regularly present to Parliament specific measures to further increase Union ownership of its external actions in their geographical contexts, in accordance with the principles of efficiency, accountability and visibility;
Nevladne organizacije (NVO)
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs)
180. sprašuje se o vlogi in rastočem številu NVO v okviru upravljanja sredstev Skupnosti; poziva Komisijo, da oceni učinkovitost operativnih donacij za bruseljske sedeže NVO, in da strogo izvaja načelo postopnega zmanjševanja operativnih donacij, ki je zapisano v finančni uredbi;
180.Takes note of the role and growing number of NGOs in the administration of Community funds; calls on the Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of operating grants for the NGOs' Brussels headquarters, and to apply strictly the principle of the degressivity of operating grants laid down in the Financial Regulation;
184. meni, da mora Komisija, v okviru izvajanja teh projektov, paziti, da so določbe o poročanju, o katerih se je dogovorilo z Združenimi narodi aprila 2007, strogo izvajane, in da se finančna poročila oblikujejo v skladu s temi zahtevami;
Considers that, in connection with project implementation, the Commission should ensure that the reporting requirements agreed with the United Nations in April 2007 are strictly applied and that financial reports are produced in accordance with those requirements;
187. meni, da je treba preučiti pojasnitev intervencijskih struktur (Evropski razvojni sklad (ERS), Komisija, Evropska investicijska banka itd) na področju razvoja in zunanjih ukrepov, da se tako omogoči večjo vidnost ukrepov Skupnosti in zagotoviti boljšo revizijo dodeljenih sredstev; poziva k izvedbi študije glede vključevanja ERS v proračun Skupnosti, z namenom politične razprave na to temo;
Considers that thought should be given to clarifying funding structures (European Development Fund (EDF), Commission, European Investment Bank, etc.) in the development and external actions fields, with a view to giving greater visibility to Community action and ensuring better auditing of the funds committed; calls for a study to be carried out into the incorporation of the EDF into the Community budget, in preparation for a political debate on this subject;
Izjava Komisije o upravičenosti do uradne razvojne pomoči, člen 5, Priloga k sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 24. oktobra 2006 ( KOM(2006)0628 ).
Draws attention to the Commission's commitment
Komisije, s katero želi zagotoviti, da se merilo 20 % njene pomoči do leta 2009 nameni osnovnemu in srednješolskemu izobraževanju ter osnovnemu zdravstvu; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi podrobne informacije o ukrepih, ki bodo sprejeti za doseganje tega števila referenc prek projektov, programov in proračunske pomoči; poziva k večji skladnosti med nacionalnimi in regionalnimi tematskimi strateškimi dokumenti, ter na področjih zdravja in izobraževanja, zlasti kadar je pomoč zagotovljena v obliki proračunske podpore;
Commission Declaration concerning Article 5 of the Development Cooperation Instrument, Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament of 24 October 2006 ( COM(2006)0628 ). to take steps to ensure that by 2009 a benchmark of 20% of its allocated assistance is devoted to basic and secondary education and basic health; calls on the Commission to provide detailed information on how this benchmark will be met through projects, programmes and budget support; calls for greater consistency between the Thematic, Country and Regional Strategy Papers in the areas of health and education, in particular when aid is provided via budget support;
191. poudarja, da je treba posvetiti ustrezno pozornost trajnosti prispevkov Komisije, vključno z oblikovanjem jasne strategije umika, ki ne ogroža doseženih rezultatov, ter spremljanjem izvajanja; meni, da boljši pregled rezultatov predstavlja glavni dejavnik zagotavljanja demokratične legitimnosti razvojnega sodelovanja Evropske unije;
Points out that due attention must be paid to the sustainability of the Commission's interventions, including the formulation of a clear exit strategy which does not compromise results and monitoring of implementation; considers that enhanced evaluation of results represents a major factor in ensuring the democratic legitimacy of Union development cooperation;
193. meni, da posvetovanje s civilno družbo in lokalnimi organi pred pripravo strateških dokumentov države (CSP) v okviru instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja ni bilo zadostno, da bi izpolnilo pravno obveznost iz člena 19(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006
Takes the view that the consultation of civil society and local authorities prior to drawing up Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) under the Development Cooperation Instrument was not sufficient to satisfy the legal obligation established under Article 19(3)of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006
41). , da se "strateški dokumenti načeloma oblikujejo na podlagi dialoga s partnerskimi državami in regijami, kar vključuje civilno družbo ter regionalne in lokalne oblasti"; meni, da je udeležba nacionalnih parlamentov partnerskih držav nujno potrebna za doseganje resnične odgovornosti za proces; poziva Komisijo, naj stori vse za izboljšanje dialoga s temi organi v vseh različnih fazah postopka načrtovanja;
41) , namely that ‘strategy papers shall, in principle, be based on a dialogue with the partner country or region which involves civil society and regional and local authorities’; considers, in this respect, the involvement of national parliaments in partner countries indispensable to achieving genuine ownership of the process; urges the Commission to make every effort to improve dialogue with these bodies at the various stages of the programming process;
Mehanizem za sodelovanje in preverjanje
Cooperation and verification mechanism
195. opaža, da je, pod vodstvom generalnega sekretariata, več generalnih direktoratov in pisarn Komisije odgovornih za upravljanje tega mehanizma; opaža, da so v skupnem ukrepanju teh služb vrzeli; pričakuje izboljšanje usklajevanja in sistematično vključevanje strokovnega znanja vseh zadevnih služb Komisije v poročilo o napredku; sprašuje se, katere so lekcije, ki jih Komisija pridobi iz teh mehanizmov za države kandidatke in morebitne države kandidatke;
Notes that a number of Commission directorates-general and offices are responsible for administering this mechanism, under the authority of the Secretary-General; considers the combined efforts of those bodies to be inadequate; expects better coordination and the systematic inclusion of an assessment of all the Commission bodies concerned in the progress reports; wonders what lessons for applicant countries and potential applicant countries the Commission draws from the mechanism;
Evropski skladi v Bolgariji in Romuniji
European funding in Bulgaria and Romania
UL C 174, 26.7.2006, str.
OJ C 174, 26.7.2006, p.
1. , že pritegnilo pozornost na veliko težav pri upravljanju evropskih sredstev, vključno z nepravilnostmi pri javnih naročilih in upravičenosti stroškov, primerih odtujitev imetja, pomanjkanje upravnih sposobnosti itd;
1. the ECA drew attention to a large number of problems concerning the management of European funds, including irregularities regarding invitations to tender and the eligibility of expenditure, cases of failure to use investment monies for their intended purpose and a lack of administrative capacity;
202. ugotavlja, da bi morala Bolgarija v obdobju 2007 – 2013 prejeti 6.853.000 EUR strukturnih skladov, Romunija pa 19.200.000 EUR; poleg informacij iz letnega poročila o dejavnostih in iz poročil o strukturnih skladih in Kohezijskem skladu, zahteva četrtletno poročanje o upravljanju teh skladov, dokler razmere ne bodo pojasnjene;
Notes that over the period 2007 to 2013 Bulgaria is to receive EUR 6 853 000 in structural funding, and Romania EUR 19 200 000; in addition to the information given in the annual activity report and in the reports on the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, calls for quarterly reports on the administration of these funds until the situation has been clarified;
207. zahteva, da Komisija, v luči zadnjega poročila o napredku in korakov nazaj na področju boja proti korupciji, predloži posebno poročilo o stanju upravljanja in nadzora vseh sredstev Skupnosti v Romuniji, in o sprejetih ukrepih ter napredku na področju boja proti korupciji, ki zajema obdobje do 15. julija 2009;
Calls on the Commission, in the light of the last progress report and the setbacks with regard to the fight against corruption, to submit to it a special report on the state of play of the management and control of EU funds in Romania and on the measures taken and the progress made in the fight against corruption covering the period until 15 July 2009;
208. poudarja, da je odgovornost delegacij Komisije v državah kandidatkah in v morebitnih državah kandidatkah, da pripravijo te države in tako zagotovijo pravilno uporabo evropskih sredstev; poziva, da se strategije za boj proti goljufiji vključijo v te predpristopne postopke in da se zadevne uprave usposobi v okviru programa za izmenjavo med Komisijo in upravami držav kandidatk ali morebitnih kandidatk;
Points out that it is the responsibility of the Commission delegations in the applicant countries and potential applicant countries to prepare those countries to ensure proper use of European funds; calls for anti-fraud strategies to be incorporated in this pre-accession process and for the relevant administrations to be trained under a programme of exchanges between the Commission and the administrations of applicant countries and potential applicant countries;
211. poziva Računsko sodišče, da pripravi posebno poročilo o učinkovitosti sistema, ki ga je vzpostavila Komisija za kontrolo evropskih sredstev, ki jih je prejelo Kosovo, in o uspešnosti sistema glede preprečevanja goljufij, in da preveri, ali je bilo financiranje v skladu s pogoji, predvideni v sporazumih o zadevnih programih, vključno s pravili za instrument za predpristopno pomoč
Calls on the ECA to produce a special report on the effectiveness of the systems put in place by the Commission to control the European funds received by Kosovo and of those systems' performance as regard fraud prevention, and to check whether the conditions laid down in the agreements on the relevant programmes, as well as the rules laid down under the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1085/2006 z dne 17. julija 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) (UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 of 17 July 2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
82). ter Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002;
82). and Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, have been fully applied to such funding;
Vplivi decentralizacije na osebje
Impact of decentralisation impact on staff
217. izraža razočaranje zaradi nezadostnih informacij, ki jih je predložila Komisija leta 2005 in 2006 na tem področju, ki je izredno pomembno z vidika proračuna; priznava prizadevanja v vmesnem času glede preglednosti na spletni strani Komisije in glede letnega poročila o oceni osebja;
Voices its disappointment at the inadequate information forwarded by the Commission in 2005 and 2006 in this area, which is extremely important from a budgetary point of view; acknowledges the efforts made in the meantime as regards transparency on the Commission website and the annual staff screening report;
Vprašanja v zvezi s stavbami Skupnosti
Matters relating to the Community’s buildings
Spremljevalni ukrepi v luči razrešnice
Follow-up measures in the light of the discharge
9. , Komisija ni v celoti ponovila določb iz Pogodbe o ES o spremljevalnih ukrepih v luči razrešnice, in da je omenila samo, da Parlament pri podeljevanju razrešnice lahko poudari pripombe, ki se mu zdijo pomembne, in pogosto priporoči ukrepe, ki bi jih morala Komisija sprejeti glede teh zadev; ugotavlja, da je ta pripomba umestna, vendar Komisija vedno pozabi omeniti, da se v členu 276 Pogodbe o ES zahteva, da tudi Komisija sprejme vse primerne korake za odziv na pripombe v sklepih Parlamenta o podelitvi razrešnice glede izvrševanja odhodkov; zato opozarja Komisijo, da pozivi iz njegove resolucije o razrešnici niso samo nezavezujoča priporočila, ampak navodila, ki jih mora Komisija upoštevati pri izvajanju proračuna;
9. , the Commission fails to repeat in full the provisions of the EC Treaty on follow-up measures in the light of the discharge, stating merely that when granting discharge Parliament may highlight observations it considers important, often recommending actions that the Commission should take concerning these matters; notes that, although this is correct, the Commission fails to mention that Article 276 of the EC Treaty also requires the Commission to take all appropriate steps to act on the observations in Parliament's decisions giving discharge relating to the execution of expenditure; reminds the Commission, therefore, that the calls made in its discharge resolution are not simply non-binding recommendations, but instructions which the Commission must act on when implementing the budget;
226. je v zvezi s tem seznanjen, da so službe Komisije julija 2008 odobrile okvirno strategijo in delovni načrt za uresničitev ciljev učinkovitosti pomoči za tehnično sodelovanje in enote za izvajanje projektov; zato poziva Komisijo, naj prvič obvesti Parlament o izvajanju te strategije pred koncem marca 2009, po tem pa vsakih šest mesecev;
Notes in this context the approval by the Commission's services in July 2008 of the Backbone Strategy and the Work Plan to meet aid effectiveness targets on Technical Cooperation and Project Implementation Units; calls therefore on the Commission to inform Parliament about the implementation of this strategy for the first time before the end of March 2009, and thereafter at six-monthly intervals;
229. obžaluje, da Komisija zelo poredko uporabi klavzulo o odložitvi, ki omogoča pospešen postopek javnega naročila; zahteva, da Komisija ta instrument uporabi premišljeno, da se izboljša časovni razpored izvajanja operacij tehnične pomoči;
Deplores the fact that the suspension clause, allowing an accelerated procurement procedure, is barely used by the Commission; requests the Commission to use this facility wisely in order to improve the timetable for the implementation of TA operations;
231. zato poziva Komisijo, da veliko bolj upošteva druga merila (kot so tista, ki jih predlaga Računsko sodišče), ne pa samo življenjepisa vodje skupine; predlaga, da se to na primer lahko stori z vzpostavitvijo zbirke podatkov, skladne s pravnimi zahtevami, ki vsebuje podjetja, ki ne zagotovijo predlaganih strokovnjakov, kar bi jim tako preprečilo, da sodelujejo pri javnih naročilih za določeno obdobje; ugotavlja, da je Komisija sprejela Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 1302/2008 z dne 17. decembra 2008 o centralni podatkovni zbirki o izključitvah
Requests therefore that the Commission take much greater account of other criteria (such as those proposed by the ECA), rather than solely considering the CV of the team leader expert; suggests that this could be done, for example, by creating a database, compatible with legal requirements, of firms which fail to provide the proposed expert, which should in turn prevent them from participating in procurement for a specified period; notes that the Commission has adopted Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1302/2008 of 17 December 2008 on the central exclusion database
UL L 344, 20.12.2008, str.
OJ L 344, 20.12.2008, p.
12. in Sklep št. 2008/969/ES, Euratom z dne 16. decembra 2008 o sistemu zgodnjega opozarjanja za odredbodajalce Komisije in izvajalske agencije
12. and Decision 2008/969/EC, Euratom of 16 December 2008 on the Early Warning System for the use of authorising officers of the Commission and the executive agencies
125. , vendar pa ta nova instrumenta ne omogočata izključitve podjetij na tej podlagi; nadalje ugotavlja, da so ti vidiki del delovnega načrta (os 3, ukrepi 13 do 15), in poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma uporabi s tem povezane ukrepe;
125. , but that these new instruments do not make it possible to exclude firms on this basis; further notes that these aspects are part of the Work Plan (Axis 3, Actions 13-15), and calls on the Commission to apply the related actions immediately;
233. poziva Komisijo, naj deluje čim bolj v skladu s pobudami o preglednosti in upošteva resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 19. februarja 2008 o preglednosti pri finančnih zadevah
Calls on the Commission, as far as possible, to act in a manner consistent with its transparency initiatives and to take into account Parliament's resolution of 19 February 2008 on transparency in financial matters
Del II: Posebno poročilo št. 1/2008 o procesu obravnavanja vlog in vrednotenja v zvezi z velikimi naložbenimi projekti iz programskih obdobij 1994–1999 in 2000–2006
Special Report No 1/2008 concerning the procedures for the preliminary examination and evaluation of major investment projects for the 1994-1999 and 2000-2006 programming periods
236. poudarja vprašanje, in išče odgovor nanj, o tem, kako se je lahko pojavila tveganju naklonjena kultura (z visoko kakovostjo, inovativnimi naložbami, ki izgubljajo odličnost), praksa, ki je popolnoma v nasprotju s prizadevanji Skupnosti, kot je zapisano v lizbonski agendi; meni, da težava ni v financiranju naložb v infrastrukturo, ampak v dejstvu, da imajo države članice možnost, da se izognejo inovativnim "tveganim" naložbam;
Points out – and seeks an answer to – the question of how the ‘risk-averse’ culture might have come about (with high-quality, innovative investments losing prominence), a practice which runs completely counter to the Community’s efforts as laid down in the Lisbon Strategy; considers that the problem lies not with funding infrastructure investments but with the fact that Member States have the opportunity to avoid innovative – ‘risky’ – investments;
Del III: Posebno poročilo št. 2/2008 o zavezujočih tarifnih informacijah
Special Report No 2/2008 concerning Binding Tariff Information (BTI)
Uredba (ES) št. 450/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2008 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti (Moderniziran carinski zakonik) (UL L 145, 4.6.2008, str.
Regulation (EC) No 450/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 laying down the Community Customs Code (Modernised Customs Code) (OJ L 145, 4.6.2008, p.
1). , imetniki ZTI pravno zavezani k predložitvi ZTI, da se bo posodobitev tezavra nadaljevala, in da je na voljo uporabniški vmesnik v vseh uradnih jezikih Evropske unije;
1). , will make BTI binding on the holder, the work of updating the thesaurus will continue and the user interface is available in all EU official languages;
243. zahteva, da Komisija do konca leta 2009 obvesti Parlament o vseh pristopih in ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela na podlagi opažanj Računskega sodišča, in o načinih, na katere so bili izvedeni;
Calls on the Commission to provide, by the end of 2009, information on all the initiatives and measures taken on the basis of the ECA's observations, together with details of their implementation;
245. ugotavlja, da kritik zaradi "hitrosti" ni mogoče pripisati izključno upravljanju Sklada s strani Komisije, saj so težave zelo pogosto povezane s pomanjkljivostmi pri upravljanju s strani držav članic in kakovostjo informacij, ki jih zagotavlja prosilec;
Notes that responsibility for the issues raised with regard to rapidity may not be attributed to the Commission alone, given that in very large number of cases the problems stem from management shortcomings on the Member States' side and the quality of the information supplied by applicants;
Del V: Posebno poročilo št. 4/2008 o izvajanju mlečnih kvot v državah članicah, ki so se Evropski uniji pridružile 1. maja 2004
Special Report No 4/2008 concerning the implementation of milk quotas in the Member States which joined the European Union on 1 May 2004
UL C 185, 22.7.2008.
OJ L 185, 22.7.2008.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 228/2008 z dne 13. marca 2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 595/2004 glede intenzivnosti kontrole oddaje in neposredne prodaje mleka (UL L 70, 14.3.2008, str.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 228/2008 of 13 March 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 with regard to intensity of controls on deliveries and direct sales of milk (OJ L 70, 14.3.2008, p.
7). , ki zmanjšuje na 1 % stopnjo inšpekcijskih pregledov za proizvajalce, katerih proizvodnja je manjša od 5000 kg;
7). which reduces to 1% the inspection rate for producers whose production is less than 5 000 kg;
a) spremljevalne ukrepe in ukrepe za prehod, ki jih je treba predvideti v regijah, v katerih mali proizvajalci predstavljajo večino;
(a) transitional and accompanying measures to be envisaged in regions where small producers are still very much in the majority;
b) potrebo, da se proizvajalcem mleka v novih državah članicah zagotovi trden zakonodajni okvir in jasne napovedi, in se jih spodbuja k naložbam, ki so bistvenega pomena za zagotavljanje trajnosti njihove dejavnosti;
(b) the need for milk producers in the new Member States to have a clear regulatory framework and clear prospects encouraging them to make the investments that are vital in order for their activity to remain viable;