natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Takrat je Parlament podal svoje mnenje
At the time, Parliament delivered its opinion
P6_TA(2004)0073 . (to je vsebovalo razne predloge sprememb, katerih večina ni bila sprejeta), v katerem je podprl zamisel o uskladitvi teh varnostnih standardov in istočasni uvedbi identifikatorjev z biometričnimi značilnostmi (podoba obraza in prstni odtisi).
P6_TA(2004)0073 . (containing various amendments, most of which were not taken up) supporting the idea of harmonising these security standards and at the same time introducing biometric identification features (facial image and fingerprints).
To usklajevanje je bilo zasnovano tako, da bi omogočilo izboljšanje varnosti potnih listov in vzpostavitev zanesljivejše povezave med dokumentom in njegovim pravim imetnikom, s čimer bi se omogočil boj proti ponarejanju dokumentov in bi se povečala učinkovitost boja proti kriminalu, terorizmu in nezakonitemu priseljevanju.
This harmonisation was designed to enable passports to be made more secure and establish a more reliable link between the document and the genuine holder, thereby making it possible to combat the falsification of documents and make the fight against crime, terrorism and clandestine immigration more effective.
Parlament pa je tudi opozoril, da uporaba teh novih tehnologij še ni bila preizkušena ali preverjena, ter poudaril, da bi morale pred izdajo biometričnih potnih listov postati ustrezne tehnične specifikacije operativne, države članice pa bi morale izpolnjevati razne zahteve, povezane z varovanjem pravic državljanov.
However, it also warned that the use of these new technologies had not yet been tried or tested and argued that, before biometric passports were issued, the corresponding technical specifications should be operational and the Member States should fulfil various requirements relating to the protection of citizens’ rights.
Poročevalec pozdravlja ugotovitev odbora iz člena 29, da izvajanje uredbe na splošno v celoti spoštuje ustrezne predpise in izpolnjuje tehnične zahteve, ki jih je Komisija sprejela naknadno.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Article 29 Committee’s recognition that, in general, the implementation of the Regulation fully respected the relevant rules and complied with the technical specifications subsequently adopted by the Commission.
Pilotni projekti, izpeljani v nekaterih državah članicah, pa so pokazali, da prstni odtisi otrok, mlajših od 6 let, niso dovolj kakovostni za preverjanje istovetnosti „ena proti ena“.
Nevertheless, during pilot projects carried out in some Member States it was found that the fingerprints of children under the age of six were not of sufficient quality for one-to-one verification of identity.
Komisija se je zato odločila, da predloži ta sveži predlog, namenjen spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2252/2004 in uvedbi:
The Commission therefore decided to submit this fresh proposal aimed at amending Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 and introducing:
– dveh izjem iz obveznosti dajanja prstnih odtisov, s katerima so tega oproščeni otroci, mlajši od 6 let, in vse osebe, ki zaradi različnih razlogov fizično niso zmožne dati prstnih odtisov;
- two derogations from the obligation to provide fingerprints, exempting children under the age of six and all persons who for various reasons are physically unable to give fingerprints;
– načela „ena oseba – en potni list“.
- the principle of one person - one passport.
Poročevalec meni, da so ukrepi, ki jih predlaga Komisija, kot celota pozitivni in potrebni, želi pa izkoristiti to priložnost za uvedbo dodatnih izboljšav.
The rapporteur considers that, on the whole, the measures proposed by the Commission are positive and necessary but wishes to take this opportunity to introduce further improvements.
Uporaba otroških potnih listov kot sredstvo za boj proti ugrabitvam otrok in trgovini z njimi
U sing children’s passports as a means of combating child abduction and trafficking
Poročevalec meni, da je v uredbi obstajala praznina, saj v njej ni bil omenjen poseben položaj otrok in ni bila določena starostna meja za pridobivanje prstnih odtisov otrok.
The rapporteur considers that there was a gap in the Regulation in that it made no reference to the specific case of children and there was no age limit for obtaining children’s fingerprints.
Enako velja v primeru oseb, ki fizično niso zmožne dati prstne odtise in potrebujejo posebno obravnavo v obliki nadomestnih postopkov.
The same applied in the case of people who are physically unable to provide fingerprints and who require special treatment in the form of alternative procedures.
V uredbi je nacionalnim zakonodajalcem prepuščeno odločanje o tem, ali opredeliti morebitne izjeme od obveznosti zagotavljanja prstnih odtisov za potne liste in druge potovalne dokumente, ki jih izdajo države članice.
The Regulation left it to the discretion of national legislators to decide whether or not to define possible exemptions from the obligation to provide fingerprints for passports and other travel documents issued by the Member States.
Na tem področju je usklajevanje bistvenega pomena in ob upoštevanju, da morajo imeti v državi poročevalca – na Portugalskem – vsi otroci, ki s šestimi leti začenjajo osnovno šolo, osebno izkaznico, ki vključuje prstne odtise, poročevalec nima večjih težav z načelnim sprejetjem te starostne meje.
Harmonisation is vital in this area, and bearing in mind that in the rapporteur’s country - Portugal - all children starting primary school from the age of six must be in possession of an identity card that includes fingerprints, the rapporteur does not have any great difficulty in accepting this age limit in principle.
Poudariti bi bilo treba tudi, da izdajanje potnih listov za otroke ni obvezno na enak način, kot je obvezno izdajanje osebnih izkaznic.
It should also be stressed that the issuing of passports for children is not compulsory in the same way as the issuing of identity cards.
Potni list je potovalni dokument, ki je potreben le, ko ljudje nameravajo potovati izven ozemlja schengenskega območja.
A passport is a travel document that is only required when people intend to travel outside the territory of the Schengen area.
Posledično se ne zdi, da bi bilo to preveliko breme za starše, ki bi si gotovo želeli uvedbe najustreznejših mehanizmov za varovanje njihovih otrok.
Consequently it does not appear to pose an excessive burden on parents, who would certainly wish the most appropriate mechanisms to be put in place to protect their children.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov je v svojem mnenju opozoril, da je tveganje napake v primeru, ko se ti biometrični podatki uporabljajo izključno za namene preverjanja (primerjanje „ena proti ena“), bistveno manjše in je starostna meja lahko nižja.
The European Data Protection Supervisor pointed out in his opinion that if these biometric data are used exclusively for verification purposes (one-to-one comparison), the risk of error is far smaller and the age limit can be lower.
Poročevalec torej meni, da je izključno za namene preverjanja sprejemljiva starostna meja šest let, zato je predlagal več sprememb, namenjenih nedvoumnemu varovanju tega cilja.
The rapporteur thus considers the six-year minimum age limit for the exclusive purposes of verification to be acceptable and has proposed a number of amendments aimed at safeguarding this objective unequivocally.
Predlaga tudi nadaljnje posebne ukrepe, kot je uvedba posebnega polja v potnem listu, ki vsebuje ime oseb(e), ki ima(jo) starševsko odgovornost do otroka.
He is also proposing further particular measures such as the introduction of a specific field in the passport with the name(s) of the person or persons who have parental responsibility for the child.
Ker je bilo doslej pridobljenih malo izkušenj z uporabo teh novih tehnologij, poročevalec meni, da je pomembno imeti posebne, zanesljive podatke, da se lahko sprejmejo prave odločitve.
Since little experience has yet been gained in the use of these new technologies, the rapporteur considers it important to have specific, reliable data so that we can take the right decisions.
Zato predlaga uvedbo klavzule o reviziji po treh letih , kar bi nam omogočilo počakati na rezultate obsežne in poglobljene študije (ki se zahteva že v poročilu o skupnih konzularnih navodilih – uvedbi biometričnih podatkov
He is therefore proposing the introduction of a three-year revision clause so that we can await the results of a large-scale and in-depth study (already requested in the CCI-biometrics report
A6-0459/2007 . , predlagala pa sta jo tudi odbor iz člena 29 in evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov), da se določi zanesljivost in uporabnost prstnih odtisov, ki se odvzamejo otrokom in starejšim.
A6-0459/2007 . and suggested by the Article 29 Committee and the European Data Protection Supervisor) to determine the reliability and usefulness of fingerprints taken from children and the elderly.
Glede na to, da so trenutno na voljo le rezultati nekaterih pilotskih projektov, ki so se izvedli v nekaj državah članicah (in potrjujejo, da je mogoče uporabljati prstne odtise otrok za preverjanje po starosti šestih let), je mogoče sprejeti le začasno odločitev, dokler ne bo dokončana ta neodvisna študija, ki bo zagotovila podatke, potrebne za sprejetje odločitve na zanesljivejši podlagi.
Given that at present we have only the results of certain pilot projects carried out in some of the Member States (which confirm that it is possible to use children's fingerprints for verification purposes from the age of six), we can only take a provisional decision until this independent study has been completed, providing us with the necessary data to take a decision on a firmer basis.
Uvedba načela „ena oseba – en potni list“
Introdu cing the principle ‘One person - one passport’
Poročevalec podpira ta predlog Komisije, usmerjen v izvajanje priporočila Mednarodne organizacije za civilno letalstvo (ICAO), ki ga že uporablja večina držav članic in s katerim je mogoče odpraviti preostale primere, ko je mogoče izdati potni list, ki vključuje otroke imetnika in navaja njihova imena, vsebuje pa zgolj biometrične podatke starša in imetnika potnega lista.
The rapporteur supports this proposal by the Commission aimed at implementing the recommendation made by the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation), which the majority of Member States already apply, making it possible to put an end to the remaining situations where a passport may be issued that includes the holder’s children, indicating their names but containing biometric data only for the parent and holder of the passport.
Zaradi takšnih primerov je lahko trgovanje z otroci lažje, saj je težko izvajati zanesljivo preverjanje identitete otroka.
Such situations may make the trafficking of children easier, since it is difficult to carry out reliable checks on the child’s identity.
Vsakdo bi moral imeti svoj potni list, ki vsebuje biometrične podatke.
Each person should have their own passport containing their biometric data.
Kot navaja nedavna študija fundacije Childfocus, so največjemu tveganju, da bodo žrtve ugrabitve in trgovine, izpostavljeni otroci, ki potujejo sami.
According to a recent study by Childfocus, the greatest risk of trafficking and abduction is faced by children travelling alone.
Po pravilih Mednarodnega združenja letalskih prevoznikov (IATA) je otrokom dovoljeno potovanje brez spremstva le, ko so stari vsaj šest let.
Under IATA rules, children are allowed to travel alone only from the age of six.
Dejstvo, da bi imeli otroci po tej starosti lastne potovalne dokumente z ustreznimi biometričnimi podatki, nedvomno zagotavlja dodatno zaščito v boju proti trgovini z otroki (kar v svojem mnenju priznava tudi evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov).
The fact that children from this age would have their own travel document with the corresponding biometric data doubtless provides additional protection in the fight against child trafficking (as is also acknowledged by the European Data Supervisor in his opinion).
Poročevalec ne želi sprožati dvomov glede veljavne zakonodaje, zlasti ne določb zakonika o mejah, ki so zasnovane za varovanje mladoletnikov in obvezujejo mejne straže, da so še posebej pozorni na mladoletnike, bodisi da potujejo s spremstvom ali brez njega, in ki določajo, da mora za mladoletnike pri prečkanju zunanjih meja veljati enako preverjanje kot za odrasle.
Your rapporteur does not wish to call the current legislation into question, in particular the Borders Code provisions designed to protect minors, which oblige border guards to pay particular attention to minors, whether travelling accompanied or unaccompanied, and states that minors must be subject to the same checks as adults when crossing external borders.
Če tako eno od preverjanj, ki se izvaja pri odraslih, temelji na potnem listu, bi moralo enako veljati za otroke, ki bi ravno tako morali imeti svoje potne liste.
Consequently, if one of the checks carried out on adults is based on their passport, the same should apply with regard to children, who should also have their own passport.
V primeru otrok, ki potujejo s spremstvom, – glede na to, da mora mejna kontrola preveriti, ali imajo osebe, ki spremljajo mladoletnika, starševsko odgovornost nad njim – bi bilo v veliko pomoč mejni straži pri izvajanju njenih nalog, če bi mladoletniki imeli potni list, ki bi vseboval njihove osebne podatke in navedbo imena osebe ali oseb, običajno njihovih staršev, ki imajo nad njimi starševsko odgovornost.
In the case of accompanied minors, given that the border guard must check that the persons accompanying minors have parental care over them, it would be a great help to the task of the border guard if minors had a passport containing their personal data and an indication of the name of the person or persons, normally the parents, who have parental responsibility for them.
Potreba po visoki ravni zaupanja v postopek zbiranja biometričnih podatkov.
Ne ed for a high level of confidence in the process of collecting biometric data
Če naj bodo potni listi in potovalni dokumenti varni, je bistvenega pomena, da obstaja visoka raven zaupanja v postopek zbiranja biometričnih podatkov, ki se vključijo v te dokumente, zato bi bilo zaželeno imeti skupne minimalne standarde za zbiranje teh podatkov, da se zagotovi njihova zanesljivost in varnost.
If passports and travel documents are to be secure, it is vital that there should be a high level of confidence in the process of collecting the biometric data that are to be inserted in those documents, and it would be desirable to have common minimum standards for collecting these data so as to guarantee their security and reliability.
Obdelava biometričnih podatkov vključuje dejansko tveganje za osebe, katerih podatki se zbirajo, saj bi njihovi podatki v primeru nepravilnega zbiranja utegnili biti izgubljeni ali uporabljeni za namene, ki ne sodijo med tiste, zaradi katerih se zbirajo.
The processing of biometric data involves genuine risks for the people whose data are being collected since, in the event of incorrect collection, their data could be mislaid or used for purposes other than those for which they were collected.
Zato so predlagane spremembe, namenjene uskladitvi postopka zbiranja podatkov in oblikovanju nadomestnih postopkov v primerih, ko pride do težav pri odvzemu prstnih odtisov.
Consequently, amendments have been proposed aimed at harmonising the procedures for collecting data and creating fallback procedures where difficulties arise in the process of taking fingerprints.
Sodelovanje organov za varstvo podatkov
Involvement of data protection authorities
Kot odziv na pismo o ukrepih, sprejetih za izvajanje uredbe v vsaki državi članici, ki ga je Jean-Marie Cavada poslal odboru iz člena 29, smo 10. decembra 2007 prejeli odgovor, v katerem odbor opozarja, da (v nasprotju s takratnimi priporočili Parlamenta) nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov niso vedno sodelovali v procesu izvajanja.
In response to a letter sent by Mr Cavada to the Article 29 Committee on the action taken to implement the Regulation in each of the Member States, we received an answer on 10 December 2007 pointing out that (contrary to the recommendation made by Parliament at the time) the national data protection authorities had not always been involved in the implementation process.
Poročevalec izraža tudi podporo evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov, ki obžaluje, da Komisija ni izpolnila zakonske obveznosti v skladu s členom 28(2) Uredbe (ES) 45/2001 in se z njim ni posvetovala pri pripravi tega zakonodajnega predloga.
Your rapporteur also expresses support for the European Data Protection Supervisor, who regrets that the Commission did not comply with the legal obligation to consult him in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 when drawing up this legislative proposal.
Poročevalec zato predlaga številne spremembe, namenjene okrepitvi sodelovanja organov za varstvo podatkov pri tem procesu.
Your rapporteur is therefore submitting a number of proposals aimed at strengthening the involvement of data protection authorities in this process.
Možnost uvedbe evropskega sistema za postopek primerjanja prstnih odtisov
Possibility of introducing a European system for the process of matching fingerprints
Način, kako se izvaja primerjanje prstnih odtisov (primerjanje na kraju samem – preverjanje biometričnih podatkov imetnika potnega lista z njihovim primerjanjem s podatki, shranjenimi v čipu potnega lista na kraju samem), se med državami članicami razlikuje, zaradi česar se lahko pojavijo napake pri ugotavljanju identitete.
The way in which the matching of fingerprints is carried out ( on-site matching - checking the passport holder's biometric identifiers by comparing them with the data stored in the passport chip on the spot) differs from one Member State to another, which may give rise to errors in the verification of identity.
Pomembno bi bilo analizirati morebitne pomanjkljivosti v sistemih identifikacije in pogostost napak , ki se zabeležijo v različnih državah članicah, da se oceni, če obstajajo velike razlike med državami članicami, in pretehta, ali je treba uvesti evropski sistem primerjanja .
It would be important to analyse the possible shortcomings in identification systems and the error rates recorded in the various Member States so as to assess whether there are significant disparities between the Member States and weigh up the need to introduce a European matching system .
Ne glede na to, kateri sistem se uporablja, je bistveno, da je varen in da ima nizko stopnjo napačnih zavrnitev, saj utegnejo imeti tovrstni primeri resne posledice za zakonite imetnike dokumentov.
Whatever system is used, it is vital that it should be secure and have a very low false rejection rate, since such situations may have serious consequences for the legitimate holders of documents.
Zato se predlaga uvedba triletne klavzule o reviziji, ki omogoča, da počakamo na rezultate študije, v kateri se primerja stopnje napak, do katerih prihaja v vsaki državi članici, da bi se lahko analizirala potreba po skupnih pravilih glede pri tem procesu primerjanja.
It is therefore proposed that a three-year revision clause be introduced so that we can await the results of a study comparing the error rates recorded in each of the Member States in order to analyse the need for common rules regarding this matching process.
Možnost oblikovanja skupnih pravil za dokumente, ki jih je treba predložiti za izdajo potnih listov – tako imenovani "žlahtniteljski" dokumenti
Possibility of creating common rules on the documents to be presented for passports to be issued – the so-called 'breeder documents'
Med državami članicami obstajajo velike neenakosti, kar zadeva dokumente, ki jih je treba predložiti (na primer rojstni list, vozniško dovoljenje, zdravstvena izkaznica, dovoljenje staršev itd.), in način, kako se izdajajo ti dokumenti.
There are also wide disparities between the Member States as regards the documents that must be submitted (such as birth certificates, driving licences, personal record cards, parental authorisation, etc.) and the way in which these documents are issued.
Glede na to, da je raven varnosti, ki se uporablja pri teh dokumentih, praviloma nižja, kot je raven pri izdajanju potnih listov, ki vsebujejo biometrične podatke in so zavarovani s strožjimi sistemi (sistemi PKI), obstaja tveganje, da bi se ti dokumenti lažje prenarejali in ponarejali.
Given that, as a rule, the level of security used for such documents is lower than that used for issuing passports containing biometric data protected by more rigorous systems (PKI systems), there is a risk that they could more easily be subject to forgery and counterfeiting.
Zato se predlaga, da bi bilo treba v povezavi s poročilom, ki ga mora Komisija predložiti v treh letih, izpeljati tudi analizo o potrebi po skupnih pravilih in da se – če ta potreba obstaja – Parlamentu predloži ustrezne zakonodajne predloge.
It is therefore proposed that, in the context of the report to be submitted by the Commission within three years, an analysis should also be made of the need for common rules and, if there is such a need, that the necessary legislative proposals be submitted to Parliament.
Za zaključek bi bilo treba poudariti, da varnost potnih listov ni odvisna zgolj od potnih listov.
In conclusion, it should be pointed out that the security of passports does not rest on the passport alone.
Enako pomembno je celotno sosledje, od predložitve dokumentov, ki so potrebni za pridobitev potnega lista, do zbiranja biometričnih podatkov in končno do preverjanja in primerjanja na mejnih kontrolnih točkah.
The whole sequence is equally important, starting with the submission of the documents necessary to obtain a passport, followed by the collection of biometric data and ending with verification and matching at border checkpoints.
Če se ne odpravijo šibki členi v celotni verigi, nima pravega smisla zaostrovati ravni varnosti v povezavi s potnimi listi.
There is little point in heightening the level of security in relation to passports without addressing weak links in the rest of the chain.
o agendi za trajnostni razvoj splošnega in poslovnega letalstva
on an Agenda for Sustainable Future in General and Business Aviation
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. januarja 2007 o agendi za trajnostni razvoj splošnega in poslovnega letalstva ( KOM(2007)0869 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission of 11 January 2007 entitled "Agenda for Sustainable Future in General and Business Aviation" ( COM(2007)0869 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. junija 2008 o spremembah uredb (ES) št. 549/2004, (ES) št. 550/2004, (ES) št. 551/2004 in (ES) št. 552/2004 z namenom izboljšanja delovanja in trajnosti evropskega letalskega sistema ( KOM(2008)0388 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2008 amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system ( COM(2008)0388 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. junija 2008 o spremembah uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 v zvezi z letališči, upravljanjem zračnega prometa in navigacijskimi službami zračnega prometa ter o razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 06/23/EGS ( KOM(2008)0390 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 in the field of aerodromes, air traffic management and air navigation services and repealing Council Directive 06/23/EEC ( COM(2008)0390 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o spremembi Direktive 2003/87/ES zaradi vključitve letalskih dejavnosti v sistem za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti ( KOM(2006)0818 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community ( COM(2006)0818 ),