natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na zasedanju 14. decembra 2009 je predsednik v skladu s členom 6(2) poslovnika razglasil, da je prejel pismo poljskih pravosodnih oblasti z dne 5. novembra 2009 z zahtevo za odvzem imunitete Krzysztofu Lisku.
At the sitting of 14 December 2009 the President announced, under Rule 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, that he had received a letter sent by the polish judicial authorities on 5 November 2009 requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Krzysztof Lisek.
Okrožni državni tožilec v Kozsalinu je zaprosil Evropski parlament, naj odvzame imuniteto svojemu poslancu Krzysztofu Lisku, zoper katerega poteka sodni postopek (zadeva V DS 24/09).
The District prosecutor in Koszalin asked to the European Parliament to waive the immunity of its Member, Krzysztof Lisek, against whom legal proceedings are being taken in Case V Ds 24/09.
Krzysztof Lisek je v postopku, ki poteka na kazenskem sodišču v Kozsalinu, obtožen kaznivih dejanj po:
Krzysztof Lisek is accused in the proceedings pending in the Koszalin Court of criminal (legal) offences under:
– členu 296(1) in (3) kazenskega zakonika z dne 6. junija 1997, objavljenega v listu zakonov iz leta 1997, št. 88, zadeva 553, kakor je bil spremenjen;
- Article 296(1) and (3) of the Penal Code of 6 June 1997 published in the Journal of Laws of 1997, No 88, Item 553, as amended;
– členu 586 zakona o trgovinskih družbah z dne 15. septembra 2000, ki je bil objavljen v listu zakonov iz leta 2000, št. 94, zadeva 1037, kakor je bil spremenjen;
- Article 586 of the Commercial Companies Code of 15 September 2000 published in the Journal of Laws of 2000, No 94, Item 1037, as amended;
– členu 77(1) in (2) zakona o računovodstvu z dne 29. septembra 1994 (prečiščeno besedilo, objavljeno v listu zakonov iz leta 2002, št. 76, zadeva 694, kakor je bil spremenjen).
- Article 77(1) and (2) of the Accountancy Act of 29 September 1994 (consolidated text published in Journal of Laws 2002, No 76, Item 694, as amended).
Krzysztof Lisek je obtožen, da je v času od najmanj 31. decembra 2002 do 31. oktobra 2006 v Gdansku, ko je bil predsednik odbora Poljskega združenja za mladinske kartice in v tej funkciji odgovoren za upravljanje sredstev tega združenja in za varovanje njegovih materialnih interesov, kršil svoje obveznosti v zvezi s tem.
The case against Krzysztof Lisek is that during a period extending from at least 31 December 2002 to 31 October 2006 in Gdańsk, while chairman of the board of the Polish Youth Card Association and, as such, responsible for managing the said Association’s material assets and for safeguarding its material interests, he breached the obligations incumbent upon him in that.
V času med 10. februarjem 2005 in 22. novembrom 2005 v Iławi, ko je bil predsednik odbora družbe Campus Sp, ni vložil zahteve za stečaj te družbe, čeprav so dolgovi družbe presegali vrednost njenih sredstev in so bili zato izpolnjeni pogoji za stečaj.
During the period from 10 February 2005 to 22 November 2005 in Iława, while chairman of the board of the Campus Sp., he failed to file for bankruptcy of Campus Sp. despite the fact that the company’s debts exceeded the value of its assets and thereby fulfilled the conditions for declaration of bankruptcy.
V času med 30. septembrom 2004 in 31. decembrom 2005 v Gdansku, ko je bil predsednik odbora Poljskega združenja za mladinske kartice, je protizakonito dovolil vnos napačnih podatkov v računovodske knjige, letno bilanco, finančno poročilo in priloge z dodatnimi podatki Poljskega združenja za mladinske kartice za leti 2004 in 2005, in sicer tako, da se v računovodske knjige in letno bilanco za leti 2004 in 2005 ter finančno poročilo ter priloge z dodatnimi podatki za leti 2004 in 2005 tega združenja niso vnesla posojila, ki jih je dalo Poljsko združenje za mladinske kartice.
During the period from 30 September 2004 to 31 December 2005 in Gdańsk, while chairman of the board of the Polish Youth Card Association, he unlawfully permitted the entry of inaccurate information in the accounting registers, annual balance sheet, financial report and supplementary data thereto of the Polish Youth Card Association for the years 2004 and 2005, through failure to enter in the accounting registers or to include in the annual balance sheet drawn up for the years 2004 and 2005, and in the financial report and supplementary data thereto for the years 2004 and 2005 of the said Association, loans made by the Polish Youth Card Association.
a) Pravo Unije
(a) Union law
7 Odbor lahko poda obrazloženo mnenje o pristojnosti organa in dopustnosti zahteve, vendar se v nobenem primeru ne izreče niti o krivdi ali nekrivdi poslanca niti o tem, ali mnenja oziroma dejanja, ki so mu pripisana, upravičujejo kazenski pregon, četudi se pri obravnavi zahteve podrobno seznani z dejstvi primera.
7 The committee may offer a reasoned opinion about the competence of the authority in question and about the admissibility of the request, but shall not, under any circumstances, pronounce on the guilt or otherwise of the Member nor on whether or not the opinions or acts attributed to him or her justify prosecution, even if, in considering the request, it acquires detailed knowledge of the facts of the case.
Ustava Republike Poljske
The Constitution of the Republic of Poland
Poslanec ne odgovarja za dejavnosti, ki jih izvaja v okviru svojega mandata v obdobju trajanja mandata in po njegovem izteku.
A Deputy shall not be held liable for activities performed within the scope of a Deputy ’ s mandate during the term thereof nor following expiry thereof.
Glede teh dejavnosti lahko poslanec odgovarja le pred sejmom, če pa je kršil pravice tretjih oseb, se lahko proti njemu uvede sodni postopek le s privolitvijo sejma.
Regarding such activities, a Deputy can only be held liable before the Sejm and, in a case where he has infringed the rights of third parties, he may only be proceeded against before a court with the consent of the Sejm.
V tem primeru se zastaralni rok za kazenske postopke podaljša za ustrezen čas.
In such instance, the statute of limitation with respect to criminal proceedings shall be extended for the equivalent time.
Člen 296(1) in (3) kazenskega zakonika z dne 6. junija 1997, objavljen v listu zakonov iz leta 1997, št. 88, zadeva 553, kakor je bil spremenjen
Article 296(1) and (3) of the Penal Code of 6 June 1997 published in the Journal of Laws of 1997, No 88, Item 553, as amended
Kdor ima obveznost, ki mu jo naloži zakon, pristojni organ ali pogodba, da upravlja premoženje ali poslovno dejavnost fizične ali pravne osebe ali organizacijske enote, ki ni pravna oseba, pa s prekoračitvijo pooblastil ali z neizpolnjevanjem obveznosti povzroči znatno gospodarsko škodo, se kaznuje z zaporno kaznijo od treh mesecev do petih let.
Whosoever, while obligated by law, by the decision of a competent body or by contract to manage the property or business activity of a natural person, legal person or organisational unit lacking in legal personality, causes significant economic damage through exceeding the powers assigned to him or by fai ling to fulfil his obligations shall be subject to punishment by imprisonment of between three months and five years.
Če je s kaznivim dejanjem iz odstavkov 1 ali 2 storjena gospodarska škoda velike vrednosti, se storilca kaznuje z zaporno kaznijo od enega leta do desetih let.
If the perpetra tor of the crime specified in Paragraph 1 or 2 causes econ omic damage on a large scale, he shall be subject to punishment by imprison ment of between one year and 10 years.
Člen 586 zakona o trgovinskih družbah z dne 15. septembra 2000, ki je bil objavljen v listu zakonov iz leta 2000, št. 94, zadeva 1037, kakor je bil spremenjen
Article 586 of the Commercial Companies Code of 15 September 2000 published in the Journal of Laws of 2000, No 94, Item 1037, as amended
Kdor med opravljanjem dejavnosti člana upravnega odbora družbe ali stečajnega upravitelja ne razglasi stečaja trgovinske družbe, kljub temu, da so podani zakonski pogoji za stečaj,
Whosoever, while serving as a member of a company ’ s management board or as liquidator, fails to declare the bankruptcy of a trading company despite the existence of conditions legally warran ting the company ’ s bankruptcy,
se kaznuje z denarno kaznijo, omejitvijo prostosti ali zaporno kaznijo do enega leta.
- shall be subject to punishment by fine, limitation of freedom or imprisonment of up to one year.
Člen 77(1) in (2) zakona o računovodstvu z dne 29. septembra 1994 (prečiščeno besedilo objavljeno v listu zakonov iz leta 2002, št. 76, zadeva 694, kakor je bil spremenjen)
Article 77(1) and (2) of the Accountancy Act of 29 September 1994 (consolidated text published in Journal of Laws 2002, No 76, Item 694, as amended)
Kdor nezakonito omogoči:
Whosoever illegally permits :
1) opustitev vodenja računovodstva, vodenje računovodstva na način, ki je v nasprotju z zakonom ali vključitev lažnih podatkov v računovodske knjige,
1) the failure to keep accounts, the keeping of accounts in a manner c ontravening the law or the inclusion of false data in accounts,
2) opustitev sestave finančnega poročila, sestavo finančnega poročila v nasprotju z zakonom ali vključitev lažnih podatkov v to poročilo
2) the failure to draw up a financial report, the drawing up of such a report in a manner contravening the law or the inclusion of false data in such a report
- se kaznuje z denarno kaznijo in/ali zaporno kaznijo do dveh let.
- shall be subject to punishment by fine, imprisonment of up to two years, or both.
Glede na navedeno je treba zahtevo okrožnega tožilca v Koszalinu obravnavati kot zahtevo za odločitev Evropskega parlamenta o nepriznanju imunitete Krzysztofu Lisku, da bo slednji lahko kazensko odgovarjal, kot dopušča člen 105(2) poljske ustave.
In view of the above, the Koszalin District Prosecutor’s request should be treated as a request for a decision of the European Parliament to waive the immunity of Mr Lisek so that he can be subjected to criminal liability, as is possible under Art. 105(2) of the Polish Constitution.
Kar zadeva veljavnost člena 8 protokola, je treba poudariti, da se obtožbe zoper Krzysztofa Liska ne nanašajo na mnenja, ki so bila izražena, ali glasove, ki so bili oddani pri opravljanju njegovih dolžnosti poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
As far as the applicability of Article 8 of the Protocol is concerned, it should be noted that the charges brought against Mr Lisek do not refer to the opinions expressed or votes cast in the performance of his duties as a member of the European Parliament.
Kar zadeva člen 9, pa je – glede na dejstvo, da se obtožnica proti Krzysztofu Lisku nanaša na dejanja, storjena na Poljskem, katere državljanstvo je imel takrat – veljavni le sledeči del: „ Med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države” .
As for Article 9, given that the charges brought against Mr Lisek refer to facts committed in Poland , whose citizenship he enjoyed at the material time, the only applicable part is the one pursuant to which ‘ during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy: a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament ’.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso bi se Evropski parlament lahko odločil, da prizna imuniteto enega svojih poslancev, če bi obstajal sum, da je namen pregona oškodovanje poslančevega političnega delovanja (fumus persecutionis).
Following its established practice, the European Parliament could decide not to waive the immunity of one of its Members if a suspicion existed that the prosecution was based on an intention to prejudice the Member’s political activities ( fumus persecutionis) .
V primeru poslanca Liska ni očitnih dokazov za to.
There is no clear evidence to that effect in this case.
Na podlagi zgoraj povedanega in listin, ki so na voljo, je treba ugotoviti, da bi bilo treba Krzysztofu Lisku odvzeti poslansko imuniteto.
On the basis of the foregoing and the available documents, it has to be concluded that Mr Lisek ‘s immunity should be waived.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov in v skladu s členom 6(2) poslovnika ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti odvzemu poslančeve imunitete Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament Krzysztofu Lisku odvzame poslansko imuniteto.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after considering the reasons for and against waiving the Member ’ s immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should waive the parliamentary immunity of Krzysztof Lisek.
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in vlado Japonske o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Japan on cooperation in science and technology
Poenostavljeni postopek – člen 46(1) poslovnika
Simplified procedure - Rule 46(1) of the Rules of Procedur e
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta (11363/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (11363/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in vlado Japonske o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju (13753/2009),
– having regard to the draft agreement between the European Community and the Government of Japan on cooperation in science and technology (13753/2009),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 186 in členom 218(6), drugi pododstavek, točka (a), Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0183/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 186 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0183/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 81, člena 90(8) in člena 46(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 81, 90(8) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7–0302/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0302/2010 ),
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in vlado Ferskih otokov o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju, ki Ferske otoke pridružuje k sedmemu okvirnemu programu Unije za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007-2013)
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Faroes on Scientific and Technological Cooperation, associating the Faroe Islands to the Union's Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007-2013)
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (11365/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (11365/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in vlado Ferskih otokov o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju, ki Ferske otoke pridružuje k sedmemu okvirnemu programu Unije za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (05475/2010),
– having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Faroes on Scientific and Technological Cooperation, associating the Faroe Islands to the Union's Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007-2013) (05475/2010),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 186(3) in členom 218(6), drugi pododstavek, točka (a), Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0184/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 186 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0184/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 81, 90(8) in 46(1) svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 81, 90(8) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0303/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0303/2010 ),
Poenostavljeni postopek - datum sprejetja
Simplified procedure – date of decision
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Hašemitsko kraljevino Jordanijo o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on Scientific and Technological Cooperation
Poenostavljeni postopek – člen 46(1) poslovnika
Simplified procedure - Rule 46(1) of the Rules of Procedure
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (11362/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (11362/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Hašemitsko kraljevino Jordanijo o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju (11790/2009),
– having regard to the draft agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on Scientific and Technological Cooperation (11790/2009),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 186 in členom 218(6), drugi pododstavek, točka (a), Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0182/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 186 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0182/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0304/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7‑0304/2010 ),
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 (Uredba o enotni SUT) v zvezi s pomočjo, dodeljeno v okviru nemškega alkoholnega monopola
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (Single CMO Regulation) as regards the aid granted in the framework of the German Alcohol Monopoly
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0336 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0336 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2), člena 42 in člena 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Articles 42 and 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,
Mnenje z dne 15. septembra 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu). ,
Opinion of 15 September 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0305/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0305/2010 ),
Predlog spremembe
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Člen 182 – odstavek 4 – točka e
Article 182 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) Nemčija do 30. junija vsako leto Komisiji predloži poročilo o delovanju monopola in pomoči, dodeljeni v okviru monopola, v predhodnem letu.
(e) before 30 June each year Germany shall submit a report to the Commission on the functioning of the Monopoly and the aid granted in the framework thereof in the previous year.
Poleg tega morajo letna poročila, predložena v letih 2013 do 2016, vključevati letni načrt postopnega opuščanja za prihodnje leto za žganjarne, za katere je proizvodnja v davčne namene ocenjena po standardni stopnji, uporabnike žganjarn in združenja proizvajalcev sadnega žganja.“
Moreover, the annual reports to be submitted in 2013 to 2016 shall include an annual phasing-out plan for the following year concerning the small-scale flat-rate distilleries, distillery users and fruit cooperative distilleries.
Komisija Poročilo posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
T he Commission shall forward that report to the European Parliament and the Council .
Poleg tega morajo letna poročila, predložena v letih 2013 do 2016, vključevati letni načrt postopnega opuščanja za prihodnje leto za žganjarne, za katere je proizvodnja v davčne namene ocenjena po standardni stopnji, uporabnike žganjarn in združenja proizvajalcev sadnega žganja.
Moreover, the annual reports to be submitted in the years 2013 to 2016 shall include an annual phasing-out plan for the following year concerning the small-scale flat-rate distilleries, distillery users and fruit cooperative distilleries.
Poročevalec se strinja s predstavljenim predlogom, vendar meni, da je treba pri izvajanju uredbe upoštevati nekaj dejstev.
Your rapporteur is in favour of the proposal presented, while considering that several points need to be taken into account for the implementation of the regulation.
Poročevalec meni, da bi bilo treba izvesti redno oceno učinka in da podaljšanje monopola ne sme trajati dlje kot do konca leta 2013, ko stopi v veljavo nova SKP.
The rapporteur considers a regular impact assessment should have been carried out and that the period of extension of the Monopoly should not have surpassed 2013, the date of the entry into force of the new CAP.
Vendar je zaradi pomena, ki ga ima za majhne žganjarne sodelovanje v monopolu, zaradi potrebe, da se približajo trgu, in ob dejstvu, da predstavljena poročila ne kažejo na kršitve konkurence na enotnem trgu, poročevalec pripravljen podpreti predlog.
However given the importance for the small scale distilleries of their participation in the Monopoly and the need for further transition towards the market and given the fact that reports presented do not demonstrate an infringement of competition in the single market, your rapporteur is ready to grant support for the proposal.
Predstavitev zakonodajnega predloga
Presentation of legislative proposal
V skladu s členom 182(4) Uredbe o enotni SUT in kot izjemo od pravil o državni pomoči lahko Nemčija dodeli državno pomoč v okviru nemškega alkoholnega monopola za proizvode, ki jih po nadaljnjem preoblikovanju trži monopol, na primer etilni alkohol kmetijskega porekla.
Under Article 182 (4) of the Single CMO Regulation and as an exception to State aid rules, Germany may grant state aid under the German Alcohol Monopoly for products marketed, after further transformation, by the monopoly, as ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin.
Skupna dovoljena državna pomoč je omejena na 110 milijonov EUR letno, večinoma pa se izplača kmetom, ki preskrbujejo s surovinami, in žganjarnam, ki surovine uporabljajo.
The total sum allowed to be granted as state aid is limited to EUR 110 million per year and mainly goes to farmers supplying the raw material and distilleries using it.
Dejansko uporabljeni proračun pa je manjši od tega zneska in se od leta 2003 stalno znižuje (od 110 milijonov na 80 milijonov EUR).
However, the actual budget used has been smaller than that amount and has been steadily decreasing since 2003 (from 110 million to 80 million euros).
Poleg tega se veliko žganjarn že prizadevno pripravlja za vstop na prosti trg z ustanavljanjem zadrug, vlaganjem v energetsko učinkovitejšo opremo in z intenzivnejšim neposrednim trženjem svojega alkohola.
Moreover, a large number of distilleries have already made efforts to prepare for their entry into the free market by creating cooperatives, investing into more energy efficient equipments and increasingly marketing their alcohol directly.
Odstopanje v sedanji obliki naj bi prenehalo veljati 31. decembra 2010.
As it now stands, the derogation should expire on December 31 st 2010.
Vendar je potrebno več časa, da se olajša postopek prilagoditve in žganjarnam omogoči preživetje na prostem trgu.
Nevertheless, more time is needed to facilitate the adaptation process, and to allow distillers to survive on the free market.
Komisija meni, da je za dokončanje postopka ukinitve monopola ter temu namenjeno pomoč potrebnih nekaj dodatnih let.
The Commission deems an extension of a few more years as necessary to complete the process of abolishing the Monopoly as well as the aid and allow for its definitive phasing-out.