natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlogi sprememb in diskrecijska pooblastila bi bila prepuščena ne-tehničnim predpisom, ki jih sprejmejo zakonodajalci.
Amendments and discretionary powers would be left to non-technical rules adopted by colegislators.
Vaš poročevalec ne izključuje uporabe člena 291 Pogodbe, če se tehnični standardi preprosto uporabljajo za določitev enotne uporabe z izvedbenimi ukrepi, ki ne morejo spremeniti nobenega elementa pravno obvezujočih aktov Unije.
Your rapporteur does not exclude the use of Article 291 of the Treaty, when technical standards are simply used to determine uniform application through implementing measures that can not amend any element of legally binding Union acts.
Tudi v tem primeru ne smejo vključevati političnih odločitev.
They should not involve policy choices also in this case.
Zato vaš poročevalec predlaga, ob zagotovitvi, da morajo uredbe, s katerimi so bili trije evropski nadzorni organi ustanovljeni, vsebovati opredelitev ali klasifikacijo, da je treba vsak tehnični standard, ki ga predlaga Komisija v Omnibusu ali pa obstaja v svežnju revidiranih direktiv v stari direktivi izvedbenih ukrepov, ustrezno posodobiti in klasificirati glede na njegov cilj in obseg ter mora zato navesti postopek, ki mu je treba slediti v novem okviru.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that, while making sure that the regulations setting up the three ESAs should contain a definition or a classification, each technical standard proposed by the Commission in the Omnibus or existing in the package of Directives revised in the old category of implementing measures should be properly updated and classified concerning its objective and scope and should consequently mention the procedure to be followed in the new framework.
Vloga evropskih nadzornih organov
Role of the European Supervisory Authorities
Vaš poročevalec meni, da je Omnibus I edinstvena priložnost za evropske institucije, da uvedejo svoj politični cilj celovitega nadzora s pravnim redom.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that the Omnibus I is a unique chance for European Institutions to introduce their political aim of an integrated supervision with its acquis .
– racionalizirali sodelovanje med nacionalnimi pristojnimi organi, Evropsko komisijo in evropskim nadzornim organom,
- streamline cooperation between national competent authorities, the European Commission and the ESAs,
– zbrali in razširili informacije, vključno z objavo na ustreznih spletnih straneh,
- gather and disseminate information, including publication on the appropriate websites,
– pripravili smernice in osnutke delegiranih aktov,
- produce guidelines and draft delegated acts,
– opredelili preiskave in inšpekcijske preglede na kraju samem,
- articulate enquiries and on-site inspections,
– spodbujali splošno usklajevanje (sektorsko, medsektorsko in čezmejno) ter skladnost v celotnem sistemu.
- promote general coordination (sectoral, cross-sectoral and cross-border) and coherence in the whole system.
o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktiv 1998/26/ES, 2002/87/ES, 2003/6/ES, 2003/41/ES, 2003/71/ES, 2004/39/ES, 2004/109/ES, 2005/60/ES, 2006/48/ES, 2006/49/ES in 2009/65/ES glede pristojnosti Evropskega bančnega organa, Evropskega organa za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine ter Evropskega organa za vrednostne papirje in trge
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 1998/26/EC, 2002/87/EC, 2003/6/EC, 2003/41/EC, 2003/71/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2004/109/EC, 2005/60/EC, 2006/48/EC, 2006/49/EC, and 2009/65/EC in respect of the powers of the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority
Evropska komisija predlaga vzpostavitev novega ustroja finančne regulacije v Evropski uniji, s katerim bi izboljšala kakovost in doslednost nadzora, zagotovila učinkovitejše oblikovanje in izvrševanje pravil ter boljšo opredelitev tveganj v finančnem sistemu.
The European Commission has proposed the establishment of a new architecture for EU financial regulation to improve the quality and consistency of supervision, ensure more effective rulemaking and enforcement and better identify risks in the financial system.
Predlaga vzpostavitev evropskega sistema finančnih nadzornih organov, ki bi ga sestavljala mreža nacionalni finančnih nadzornih organov, ki bi delovali v povezavi s tremi evropskimi nadzornimi organi: Evropskim bančnim organom, Evropskim organom za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine ter Evropskim organom za vrednostne papirje in trge.
It is proposed to establish a European System of Financial Supervisors (ESFS), comprising of a network of national financial supervisors working with three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs): a European Banking Authority (EBA); a European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA); and a European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).
Za nadzor in oceno morebitnih groženj finančni stabilnosti bi ustanovili Evropski odbor za sistemska tveganja.
A European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) will also be established to monitor and assess potential threats to financial stability.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je sprejel mnenje, v katerem na splošno podpira omenjene cilje Komisije in predlagano strukturo, vendar meni, da je treba spoštovati načelo subsidiarnosti ter da morajo države članice in nacionalni finančni nadzorni organi ohraniti pristojnost, kjer je to ustrezno.
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted its opinion, in which it broadly supports the Commission's objectives outlined above and the structure proposed, believing, however, that it is important for the principle of subsidiarity to be respected and for Member States and national financial supervisors to retain competence where this would be appropriate.
Ključna vprašanja
Key concerns
Ključna vprašanja pripravljavca mnenja v zvezi s tem, kako daleč bodo segala pooblastila evropskih nadzornih organov in Komisije pri oblikovanju pravil, v zvezi s prenosom pooblastil za sprejemanje zavezujočih odločitev na evropske nadzorne organe in glede tega, kakšna bo vloga evropskih nadzornih organov pri reševanju morebitnih nesoglasij med nacionalnimi finančnimi nadzornimi organi, so bila obravnavana v končnem mnenju.
Your rapporteur´s key concerns with regards to the scope of the rulemaking powers of the ESAs and the Commission, the delegation of binding decision-making powers to the ESAs, the role of the ESAs in mediating between possible disagreements between national financial supervisorswere considered in the final opinion.
Ker se direktiva sklicuje na 11 drugih direktiv, med katerimi nekatere še niso začele veljati ali pa bodo morda znatno spremenjene, bi bilo zaželeno, če bi bilo na voljo več časa za poglobljeno pravno analizo.
As the directive concerned refers to 11 other directives, some of which have not yet been enacted and may be substantially amended, it would have been desirable to have more time for in-depth legal analysis to take place.
Vseeno pa se mnenje odbora za pravne zadeve namerava tvorno uporabiti pri delu pristojnega odbora.
However, the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs is intended to constructively feed into the work of the lead committee.
V skladu s predlogi bodo evropski nadzorni organi lahko pripravili osnutke tehničnih standardov, ki jih bo potrdila Komisija.
Under the proposals, the ESAs will be able to develop draft technical standards, to be endorsed by the Commission..
Čeprav je v uvodni izjavi določeno, da tehnični standardi ne bi smeli vključevati političnih odločitev, pa kaže, da so sedanje določbe nepotrebno ohlapne glede obsega, saj je v obrazložitvenemu memorandumu prožnost opredeljena kot eno od vodilnih načel.
Whilst it is provided in the recital that "technical standards should not...involve policy choices" , the scope of the current provisions appears unnecessarily broad with flexibility being identified as one of the overlying principles in the explanatory memorandum.
Čeprav se pripravljavec mnenja strinja, da je za učinkovito delovanje evropskih nadzornih organov pri razvijanju osnutkov tehničnih standardov potrebno nekaj prožnosti, pa meni, da so spremembe potrebne v nekaterih primerih, kjer bi razvijanje osnutkov tehničnih standardov lahko vključevalo politične odločitve.
Whilst the rapporteur accepts that a level of flexibility is necessary in order for the ESAs to operate effectively in producing technical standards, he nonetheless believes that amendments are necessary in specific instances where the creation of technical standards would involve policy choices.
Ker je Komisija predlog predložila pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, je bilo treba predlagani postopek za sprejetje tehničnih standardov prilagoditi Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije.
As the proposal was presented by the Commission before the Lisbon Treaty came into force, alignment of the proposed procedure for the adoption of technical standards to the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union was necessary.
V skladu s pristopom pripravljavca mnenja, da bi morala biti pristojnost za sprejemanje tehničnih standardov z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členom 290 PDEU prenesena na Komisijo, je odbor sprejel sveženj predlogov sprememb.
In line with the rapporteur' s approach that the adoption of technical standards should be a power to be conferred on the Commission under Article 290 TFEU as delegated acts, a package of amendments was adopted by the committee.
Namen teh predlogov sprememb je sprememba 11 direktiv, ki jih spreminja predlog Komisije, samo v zvezi s tehničnimi standardi in novimi organi.
These amendments are intended to amend the 11 directives, which are being amended by the Commission's proposal, only in so far as technical standards and the new Authorities are concerned.
V vse ostale določbe o komitologiji iz spremenjenih direktiv ti predlogi sprememb še ne posegajo, kakor je določeno v predlogu nove uvodne izjave 14a (novo), vendar odbor meni, da jih je treba spremeniti čim prej in v skladu z načeli iz Szajerjevega poročila
All other comitology provisions of the amended directives are not yet touched by these amendments, as set out in the proposed new recital 14a (new), but have to be amended, from the committee's point of view, as quickly as possible in accordance with the principles set out in the Szajer report
Poročilo odbora za pravne zadeve z dne 29. marca 2010; poročevalec Jozsef Szajer, PE439.171v03-00. (glej zlasti točko 18) ter tako v kar največjem obsegu dati prednost delegiranim aktom.
Report of the Committee on Legal Affairs of 29.3.2010, rapporteur Jozsef Szajer, PE439.171v03-00. (see in particular point 18), preferring as far as possible delegated acts.
Namen svežnja sprejetih predlogov sprememb je natančno spremljanje predlogov iz Szajerjevega poročila, tako da se predlaga prenos pooblastil na Komisijo v skladu s členom 290 PDEU za omejen čas (v tem primeru pet let), ki ga je na zahtevo Komisije mogoče podaljšati za nadaljnja obdobja petih let, možnost Parlamenta ali Sveta, da jih kadar koli prekliče, in možnost, da jim Parlament ali Svet nasprotuje v roku treh mesecev.
The package of the adopted amendments intends to follow closely the proposals of the Szajer report, by proposing the delegation of powers to the Commission in accordance with Article 290 TFEU for a limited period of time (here 5 years), which can be extended on the request of the Commission for periods of five years, revocation by the Parliament or the Council at any time, and objection by the Parliament or the Council within a period of 3 months.
V zvezi s standardi, ki jih pripravijo organi in jih sprejme Komisija, se predlogi sprememb sklicujejo na postopek iz člena 7 treh uredb o treh evropskih nadzornih organih.
As regards the drafting of the standards by the Authorities and the adoption of the standards by the Commission, reference is made to the procedure in Article 7 of the three ESA regulations.
Reševanje sporov med nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi
Settlement of disagreements between national supervisory authorities
Posamezne direktive, ki urejajo delovanje evropskih nadzornih organov, predlagajo naslednje mehanizme, ki omogočajo: da lahko evropski nadzorni organ odloča, kadar nacionalni finančni nadzorni organ ni deloval v skladu z enim od njegovih priporočil; da evropski nadzorni organi rešujejo spore med nacionalnimi finančnimi nadzornimi organi.
In the individual directives concerning the ESAs, mechanisms are proposed by which: an ESA is able to decide when a national financial supervisor has not complied with one of its recommendations; and for dispute resolution by an ESA between national financial supervisors.
Skrbi pripravljavca mnenja, da bi bil lahko prenos diskrecije na nove agencije v nasprotju s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije
The rapporteur's concerns that the delegation of discretion to these new agencies could contravene ECJ case-law
Sodbi Sodišča z dne 13. junija 1958, v zadevah C -9/56 in 10/56, Meroni proti Visoki oblasti, [1958] Recueil 133 in 157. , v skladu s katero agencije Skupnosti ne morejo prekoračiti jasno določenih meja izvršilnih pooblastil in ne smejo uporabljati diskrecijskih pooblastil, in da institucija ne sme prenesti pooblastil, ki niso njena, se odražajo v posebnih predlogih sprememb o delu evropskih nadzornih organov pri reševanju težav pri pripravi osnutkov.
Judgments of the Court of Justice of 13 June 1958, Meroni v High Authority, C-9/56 and 10/56, 1958 E.C.R. 133 and 157. which established that an agency of the Community cannot exceed clearly defined executive powers and must not exercise discretionary power, and that an institution may not delegate powers that it does not possess, are reflected in specific amendments with regard to the ESAs resolving difficulties in the drafting.
Zlasti se nanašajo na reševanje sporov.
These relate specifically to the settlement of disagreements.
Nadzorni modeli na nacionalni ravni zaostajajo za integriranostjo in medsebojno povezanostjo evropskih finančnih trgov, na katerih veliko finančnih družb posluje čezmejno.
Nationally-based supervisory models have lagged behind the integrated and interconnected reality of European financial markets, in which many financial firms operate across borders.
Te spremembe zadevajo opredelitev obsega nekaterih pooblastil evropskih nadzornih organov in vključitev nekaterih pooblastil v obstoječe postopke , ki jih določa zadevna zakonodaja Skupnosti , ter spremembe za zagotovitev neoviranega in učinkovitega delovanja v okviru evropskega sistema finančnih nadzornih organov.
These changes concern the definition of the scope of certain powers of the European Supervisory Authorities, the integration of certain powers in existing processes established in relevant Community legislation and amendments to ensure a smooth and effective functioning in the context of the European System of Financial Supervisors.
(6) Za učinkovito delovanje evropskega sistema finančnih nadzornih organov so potrebne spremembe zakonodaje Unije na področju delovanja teh treh organov.
(6) In order for the European System of Financial Supervisors to work effectively, changes to Union legislation in the field of operation of the three Authorities are necessary.
Te spremembe zadevajo opredelitev obsega nekaterih pooblastil evropskih nadzornih organov in vključitev nekaterih pooblastil, ki jih določa zadevna zakonodaja Unije , ter spremembe za zagotovitev neoviranega in učinkovitega delovanja v okviru evropskega sistema finančnih nadzornih organov.
These changes concern the definition of the scope of certain powers of the European Supervisory Authorities, the integration of certain powers established in Union legislation and amendments to ensure a smooth and effective functioning in the context of the European System of Financial Supervisors.
(7) Ustanovitev treh evropskih nadzornih organov je treba podpreti z razvojem enotnega sklopa usklajenih pravil, ki bi zagotovil enotno uporabo in s tem prispeval k učinkovitejšemu delovanju notranjega trga.
(7) The establishment of the three European Supervisory Authorities ( ESA ) should be accompanied by the development of a single set of harmonised rules so as to ensure uniform application and thus contribute to a more effective functioning of the Internal Market.
Uredbe o vzpostavitvi sistema ESFS določajo, da lahko evropski nadzorni organi pripravljajo osnutke tehničnih standardov na področjih, ki so natančno določena v zadevni zakonodaji, in jih predložijo Komisiji, ki jih sprejme v obliki uredb ali sklepov .
The Regulations establishing the ESFS provide that the European Supervisory Authorities may develop draft technical standards in the areas specifically set out in the relevant legislation, to be submitted to the Commission for adoption by means of Regulations or Decisions .
V zadevni zakonodaji morajo biti določena tista področja, na katerih imajo evropski nadzorni organi pooblastila za pripravo osnutkov tehničnih standardov .
The relevant legislation should define those areas where the European Supervisory Authorities are empowered to develop draft technical standards.
(7) Ustanovitev treh evropskih nadzornih organov je treba podpreti z razvojem enotnega sklopa usklajenih pravil, ki bi zagotovil enotno uporabo in s tem prispeval k učinkovitejšemu delovanju notranjega trga.
(7) The establishment of the three European Supervisory Authorities ( ESAs ) should be accompanied by the development of a single set of harmonised rules so as to ensure uniform application and thus contribute to a more effective functioning of the Internal Market.
Uredbe o vzpostavitvi sistema ESFS določajo, da lahko evropski nadzorni organi pripravljajo osnutke tehničnih standardov na področjih, ki so natančno določena v zadevni zakonodaji in ne vključujejo političnih odločitev , in jih predložijo Komisiji, ki jih sprejme v obliki delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije .
The Regulations establishing the ESFS provide that the ESAs may develop draft technical standards in the areas specifically set out in the relevant legislation, not including policy decisions, to be submitted to the Commission for adoption by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union .
V zadevni zakonodaji morajo biti določena tista področja, na katerih ima Komisija pooblastila , da z delegiranimi akti sprejme tehnične standarde .
The relevant legislation should define those areas where the Commission is empowered to adopt technical standards by means of delegated acts .
Pravno mora biti jasno, da osnutki tehničnih standardov ne smejo vključevati političnih odločitev, kot je to določeno z direktivami o ustanovitvi Evropskega bančnega organa, Evropskega organa za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine ter Evropskega organa za vrednostne papirje in trg.
It must be made clear in legal terms that draft technical standards should not include policy decisions as laid out in the establishing Directives of the EBA, ESMA and EIOPA.
Izbrati je treba le tista področja, na katerih bodo usklajena tehnična pravila prispevala k finančni stabilnosti, zaščiti deponentov, imetnikov polic in vlagateljev, učinkovitosti trga in integriteti ter preprečevala izkrivljanja konkurence in tveganja regulatorne arbitraže.
Only those areas should be selected where consistent technical rules will contribute significantly to financial stability, depositor, policy holder and investor protection, market efficiency and integrity, and eliminate distortions of competition and risks of regulatory arbitrage.
Izbrati je treba le tista področja, na katerih bodo usklajena tehnična pravila prispevala k finančni stabilnosti, zaščiti deponentov, imetnikov polic in vlagateljev, učinkovitosti trga in integriteti ter preprečevala izkrivljanja konkurence in tveganja regulatorne arbitraže , pri čemer se zagotovi, da v skladu z običajnimi postopki politične odločitve sprejmejo Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija .
Only those areas should be selected where consistent technical rules will contribute significantly to financial stability, depositor, policy holder and investor protection, market efficiency and integrity, and eliminate distortions of competition and risks of regulatory arbitrage , while ensuring that policy decisions are taken, in accordance with the usual procedures, by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission .
Pripravljavec mnenja poudarja, da je za politične odločitve potreben zakonodajni nadzor.
The rapporteur emphasises that policy decisions need to have legislative oversight.
Tehnični standardi splošne uporabe so omejeni na dopolnjevanje ali spreminjanje nekaterih nebistvenih elementov osnovnega zakonodajnega akta .
The technical standards of general application should be limited to supplementing or amending certain non-essential elements of the basic legislative act .
Komisija se mora pooblastiti, da z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejme te tehnične standarde.
In accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Commission should be empowered to adopt those technical standards by means of delegated acts.
Komisija mora imeti možnost, da uporabi strokovno znanje evropskih nadzornih organov, kot je določeno v uredbah o vzpostavitvi ESFS.
The Commission should be able to use the expertise of the ESAs as set out in the Regulations establishing the ESFS.
Za namene usklajenosti je torej ustrezno uvesti postopek za sprejemanje tehničnih standardov iz člena 7 uredb (ES) št. …/… [EBA], št. …/… [ESMA] in št. …/… [EIOPA].
For the sake of consistency , it is therefore appropriate to introduce the procedure for the adoption of technical standards provided for in Article 7 of Regulations (EC) No. …/…[EBA], No. …/… [ESMA], and No. …/… [EIOPA].
Če je zakonodaja v postopku revizije, se uporabi ustrezni sozakonodajni postopek, da se popolnoma nedvoumno določi vsebina osnutkov tehničnih standardov in omogoči, da bodo nujne spremembe lahko izvedene z uporabo ustreznih postopkov.
Where legislation is currently under review proper co-legislative procedures should be used to assure absolute certainty in what the content of draft technical standards should be so necessary adjustments can be made via the proper procedures.
(12a) Ta direktiva mora zato določati okoliščine, v katerih je treba rešiti postopkovna ali celovita vprašanja skladnosti z zakonodajo Unije, nadzorniki pa sami ne morejo rešiti zadeve.
(12a) This Directive should therefore identify situations where a procedural or a substantive issue of compliance with Union law may need to be resolved and the supervisors may not be able to resolve the matter on their own.
V takšnih okoliščinah mora imeti eden izmed nadzornikov možnost predložiti vprašanje pristojnemu evropskemu nadzornemu organu.
In such a situation, one of the supervisors involved should be able to refer the issue to the competent ESA.
Evropski nadzorni organ mora ukrepati v skladu s postopki, določenimi v tej direktivi.
The ESA should act in accordance with the procedure set out in this Directive.
V primerih, ko ustrezna zakonodaja EU podeljuje diskrecijo državam članicam, odločitve, ki jih sprejmejo evropski nadzorni organi, ne nadomeščajo izvajanja diskrecije nacionalnih nadzornikov, ki je v skladu z zakonodajo Evropske unije.
In cases where the relevant EU legislation confers discretion on Member States, decisions taken by the ESA should not replace the national supervisors' exercise of discretion in compliance with Union law.
Da bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti skladnost s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije (C -9/56 in 10/56, Meroni proti Visoki oblasti,[1958] Recueil 133 in 157), je pomembno, da določitve, ki jih sprejmejo evropski nadzorni organi, ne nadomeščajo zakonite presoje nacionalnih nadzornikov.
In order for there to be compliance with ECJ case-law (C -9/56 and 10/56, Meroni v High Authority, [1958] E.C.R. 133 and 157), it is important that decisions taken by ESAs do not replace the lawful exercise of judgement by national supervisors.