natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Lokalne potrebe in/ali prednostne naloge na ravni EU
Local needs and/vs. EU priorities
Mesta so v Evropi centri gospodarskih dejavnosti, inovacij in zaposlovanja, soočajo pa se tudi s številnimi izzivi.
Europe's cities are its centres of economic activity, innovation and employment, yet they face a number of challenges.
Težnja k suburbanizaciji, koncentracija prikrajšanosti in brezposelnosti v mestnih soseskah, vse večji zastoji – to so kompleksni problemi, ki zahtevajo celovite odgovore, prilagojene lokalnim potrebam, v katere je treba vključiti prometno in stanovanjsko področje ter programe usposabljanja in zaposlovanja.
The trend to suburbanisation, the concentration of deprivation and unemployment in urban neighbourhoods, increasing congestion – complex problems such as these require integrated answers in transport, housing, and training and employment schemes, which must be tailored to local needs.
Evropska regionalna in kohezijska politika obravnavata te izzive.
European regional and cohesion policies address these challenges.
Po eni strani je jasno, da mora biti sofinanciranje EU usklajeno z vsemi prednostnimi nalogami EU, ki so vključene v strategijo EU 2020.
On one hand, there is a clear understanding that the EU co-financing must go hand in hand with the overall EU priorities incorporated in the EU2020 strategy.
Njegova vsebina je osredotočena na soočanje z novimi izzivi in začasnimi učinki gospodarskega nazadovanja.
Its content is focused on coping with new challenges and temporary impacts of the economic downturn.
Po drugi strani poročevalec meni, da kohezijska politika (vključno z mestno agendo) ne sme opustiti svojega prvotnega namena, torej premagovanja obstoječih razlik.
On the other hand, your Rapporteur is of the opinion that Cohesion Policy (including its Urban Agenda) must not give up its original purpose, that is, in overcoming current disparities.
Kadar morajo lokalni organi določiti prednostne naloge, dejansko dajejo prednost naložbam v neenakosti in pomanjkljivosti, šele nato bi vlagali v spopadanje s svetovnimi trendi.
As a matter of fact, when local authorities are asked to prioritise, they tend to prefer investments into the disparities and handicaps, and then into coping with global trends.
Ključnega pomena je poiskati pravo ravnovesje med tema dvema usmeritvama.
Finding a way to strike the right balance between these two directions is of a crucial importance.
Poročevalec meni, da subvencioniranje EU ne sme samo nadomestiti premajhnih vlaganj v preteklosti.
Your Rapporteur is of the opinion that EU funding should not purely substitute the past under-investments.
Po drugi strani pa raven EU ne sme biti preveč predpisovalna, sicer ponudba EU ne bo ustrezala lokalnemu povpraševanju.
On the other hand the EU level should not be too prescriptive either, otherwise the EU offer will not meet with the local demand.
Utemeljitev bi lahko bile naložbe v pameten razvoj mest s ciljem dvigniti raven kakovosti infrastrukture in storitev v mestih.
The justification might be to invest into smart urban development with the aim of lifting the cities' infrastructure and services to a higher qualitative level.
Nadaljnji prenos odgovornosti (odločanje, izbira projektov, finančni vidiki)
Sub-delegation of responsibilities (decision-making, project selection, financial)
Načelo subsidiarnosti je ključni element pri evropskih posegih v regionalni razvoj in razvoj mest.
The principle of subsidiarity is a key element when it comes to European interventions in regional and urban development.
Poročevalec meni, da bi morale skupne prednostne naloge in ukrepi podpirati pobude na lokalni ravni, ne pa jih nadomeščati.
Your Rapporteur is of the view that the common priorities and measures should support the initiatives at local level and should not substitute them.
V tem pogledu je ključno vprašanje, kateri ukrepi na kateri ravni.
The question of 'What measures at which level?' is key in this respect.
Priporoča, naj vsaka raven izkorišča svoje prednosti:
He advocates that each level should capitalise on its strengths:
· Raven EU – zagotavljanje finančnih sredstev, podatkov (primerjalno merjenje, svetovni trendi), metodologij na podlagi skupnih najboljših praks, usmerjanje za upravljanje na več ravneh, določanje minimalnih standardov za programe, da bodo skladni s prednostnimi nalogami EU);
· EU level - providing financial resources, data (benchmarking, global trends), methodology based on shared best practice, guidance for multi-level governance, setting minimum standards for programmes to comply with EU priorities;
· Nacionalna raven – formalna soodgovornost za mesta pri načrtovanju, pogajanjih in izvajanju programov, ustvarjanje orodij in sredstev za posebne nacionalne prednostne naloge na področju razvoja mest, ki se dopolnjujejo s prednostnimi nalogami EU;
· National level - formal co-responsibility for cities in designing, negotiating and implementing the programmes, creating tools and resources for specific national priorities of urban development complementary to EU ones;
· Regionalna raven – mesta naj bodo soodgovorna za regionalne operativne programe (glej zgoraj), usklajevanje regionalnih in lokalnih strateških razvojnih načrtov, oblikovanje struktur za tako usklajevanje, ustvarjanje orodij in sredstev za posebne regionalne prednostne naloge razvoja mest, ki dopolnjujejo prednostne naloge EU in nacionalne prednostne naloge;
· Regional level - making cities co-responsible for the regional operational programmes (see above), coordinating the regional and local strategic development plans, creating structures for such a coordination, creating tools and resources for specific regional priorities of urban development complementary to EU and national ones;
· Lokalna raven – analiza, strateško načrtovanje in odločanje, izbira projektov (ne nujno upravljanje s sredstvi), celovito finančno načrtovanje (sredstva EU, nacionalna, regionalna, lokalna in zasebna sredstva).
· Local level - analysis, strategic planning and decision making, project selection (not necessarily 'administering' the funds), integrated financial planning (EU, national, regional, local and private resources).
Upravljanje na več ravneh in načelo partnerstva
Multilevel governance and partnership principle
Za prihodnji razvoj mestne agende je zelo pomembno, da upošteva izkušnje zadnje integracije mest.
For the future evolution of the Urban Agenda it is very important to reflect on the experience of recent 'urban mainstreaming'.
Pred nadaljnjimi koraki je treba opraviti ustrezno vrednotenje procesa integracije, vključno s seznamom prednosti in slabosti.
A proper evaluation of the mainstreaming process including the list of strengths and weaknesses must be carried out before further steps are taken.
Na podlagi tega je treba pripraviti priporočila ali standarde za bolj formalizirano vključevanje lokalnih skupnosti v oblikovanje in izvajanje prihodnje politike.
This should lead to a list of recommendations or standards for more formalised local involvement in the future policy design and implementation.
Celovito strateško načrtovanje je na splošno sprejeto kot pomembno orodje za zagotavljanje učinkovitosti in celostnega pristopa k lokalnemu razvoju.
Integrated strategic planning is commonly accepted as an important tool ensuring the efficiency and holistic approach to local development.
Po drugi strani je opredelitev in razumevanje od države članice do države članice različno.
On the other hand the definition and understanding varies member state by member state.
Določitev skupnih usmeritev bi lahko bila v pomoč.
Setting a common guidance might be of a help.
Zato poročevalec predlaga, naj EP pozove Komisijo, naj pripravi take smernice in okrepi prizadevanja za tehnično pomoč.
Therefore your Rapporteur suggests that the EP calls on the Commission to create such a guideline, and to step up technical assistance efforts.
Hkrati je treba spodbujati tudi države članice, naj se poslužujejo pomoči, ki je na voljo za urbanistično načrtovanje.
At the same time Member States will also be encouraged to make use of the available assistance in urban planning.
Celovito finančno načrtovanje, vključno s prihodnostjo finančnega inženiringa
Comprehensive financial planning including the future of financial engineering
Izkušnje kažejo, da projektne ideje v številnih primerih nastanejo na podlagi razpoložljivosti sredstev, ne pa na podlagi realnih potreb in strateških prednostnih nalog.
Experience shows that in many cases, project ideas are generated based on the availability of funding, instead of being based on real needs and strategic priorities.
To je eden od glavnih izzivov razvojnih politik, pa tudi kohezijske politike.
It is one of the main challenges of development policies and also of Cohesion Policy.
Pristop „projekti za denar“ bi bilo treba zamenjati s pristopom „denar za projekte“: projekti se ne bi smeli pripravljati zato, da se porabijo razpoložljiva sredstva, ampak za doseganje strateških ciljev.
This 'projects for money' approach should be replaced by 'money for projects' approach: projects should not be drafted to withdraw the funds available but to meet the strategic goals.
Poročevalec meni, da bi morala imeti mesta na voljo dovolj prožnosti, da bi izkoristila sredstva za svoje prednostne naloge.
Your Rapporteur is of the opinion that the cities should be offered sufficient flexibility to use the funds for their very priorities.
Razvojni projekti se ne bi smeli pripravljati zato, da se porabijo razpoložljiva sredstva, ampak zato, da se dosežejo strateški cilji.
The development projects should not be drafted to withdraw the funds available but to meet the strategic goals.
Možnosti regionalnega in nacionalnega financiranja ter financiranja EU bi se morale usklajevati tako, da bi pokrivale celoten spekter različnih potreb.
Regional, national and EU funding opportunities should be coordinated so as to cover the whole range of specific needs.
o evropski mestni agendi in njeni prihodnosti v kohezijski politiki
on the European Urban Agenda and its future in cohesion policy
A. ker sta mobilnost in dostop do prometa bistvena dejavnika za mestni razvoj, zlasti na večkratno prikrajšanih območjih, in ker lahko promet pomembno vpliva na regionalni razvoj, gospodarstvo, okolje in blaginjo mestnega območja ter njegovih prebivalcev,
A. whereas mobility and access to transport are vital factors in urban development, particularly in multiple deprivation areas, and transport can have a major impact on regional development, on the economy, environment and prosperity of an urban area, and on its citizens,
B. ker se večina prometnih (zlasti za vseevropska prometna omrežja TEN-T) in intermodalnih vozlišč nahaja v mestih in ker ima mestna mobilnost bistven pomen za dobro delovanje teh strateških točk pri zagotavljanju dostavnih storitev (feeder services) in intermodalnih povezav;
B. whereas most transport intersections (in particular for the Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-Ts)) and intermodal hubs are located in urban areas, and whereas urban mobility plays a vital role in the smooth functioning of these strategic points with regard to the provision of both feeder services and intermodal links,
C. ker je poleg okoljskih ciljev ter ciljev za dobro pretočnost in energetsko učinkovitost izboljšanje splošne učinkovitosti prometa poglavitni element strategije EU 2020, zlasti na mestnih območjih, kjer živi 75 % evropskih državljanov in nastaja 85 % BDP Unije,
C. whereas, in addition to objectives relating to the environment, traffic flow and energy performance, better overall transport performance is a key element of the EU 2020 strategy, in particular in urban areas – where some 75% of EU citizens live and which account for 85% of the Union’s GDP,
3. ponovno izraža podporo načelom iz svoje resolucije o akcijskem načrtu za mobilnost v mestih ( 2008/2217(INI) ) ter poziva k izvajanju 20 ukrepov, ki jih predlaga Komisija v okviru akcijskega načrta za mobilnost v mestih (KOM(2009)490);
Reiterates its endorsement of the principles set out in its resolution on an Action Plan on Urban Mobility ( 2008/2217(INI) ) and calls for the implementation of the 20 actions proposed by the Commission in the Action Plan on Urban Mobility ( COM(2009)0490 );
7. odločno podpira uporabo in spodbujanje integriranih načrtov mobilnosti v mestih (načrti za mestni promet), vključno z logističnimi načrti za blago in storitve; poziva Komisijo, naj objavi priporočila in navodila za pripravo teh načrtov, ki bodo med drugim vključevala razvoj mehke prometne infrastrukture (kolesarske poti, cone za pešce, itd.), popolnoma integrirane z javnim prometom, ter izboljšanje urbanističnega načrtovanja in redne povezave z okolico in podeželjem ob upoštevanju glavnih meril, kot so varnost, kakovost življenja prebivalcev, okolje in ekonomska učinkovitost; predlaga, naj EU pogojuje financiranje projektov mestnega prometa z obstojem teh načrtov;
Strongly supports the use and promotion of integrated sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs), including urban logistics plans for goods and services; urges the Commission to publish recommendations and guidance documents for drawing up these plans covering, inter alia, the development of soft traffic infrastructure (cycling paths, pedestrian zones, etc.) fully integrated with public transport, improved urban planning and regular connections to surrounding and rural areas, and taking account of key criteria such as safety, residents’ quality of life, the environment and economic efficiency; proposes that EU funding for urban transport projects should be made contingent on the existence of such plans;
9. meni, da je sistem enotnih vozovnic za mestni, medkrajevni in regionalni prevoz bistvenega pomena za mobilnost v mestih, in poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja najboljše prakse v zvezi z obstoječimi programi v Uniji in po potrebi sprejme tudi posebne ukrepe;
Considers integrated ticketing at urban, inter-city and regional level to be vital for urban mobility, and urges the Commission to promote best practice with regard to existing schemes within the Union, and to put forward specific measures where appropriate;
12. poudarja, da lahko uporaba hitrih, čistih rečnih ladij močno prispeva k zmanjšanju ekološkega odtisa mestnega prometa, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo izmenjavo najboljših praks na tem področju,
Points out that the use of fast, clean river boats can make a major contribution to reducing the ecological footprint of urban transport, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage exchanges of best practice in that regard;
17. poziva Komisijo, naj ob prihodnjem medsektorskem pregledu uredb o pravicah potnikov nameni posebno pozornost osebam z omejeno mobilnostjo ter vanj vključi ustrezne zainteresirane skupine državljanov;
Calls on the Commission to ensure, when the regulations on passengers’ rights next come up for a cross-cutting review, that it pays particular attention to groups of people with reduced mobility, and to the involvement of relevant citizens’ groups;
19. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj vlagajo v ITS, ki zagotavljajo inovativne storitve na področju različnih vrst prometa, upravljanja prometa ter bolj usklajenih in "pametnejših" prometnih omrežij;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to invest in ITS which provide innovative services related to different modes of transport, traffic management and more coordinated and ‘smarter’ transport networks;
22. meni, da so mesta glavna vozlišča vseevropskega prometnega omrežja ter da imajo (v skladu s členom 170 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije) ključno vlogo pri teritorialni, ekonomski in socialni koheziji; poziva Komisijo, naj pri naslednjem pregledu TEN-T jasno opredeli povezavo med temi mestnimi vozlišči ter njihovimi pristaniškimi, letališkimi in logističnimi centri;
Considers that cities form the main hubs of the TEN-Ts and – in accordance with Article 170 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – play a key role in territorial, economic and social cohesion; calls on the Commission, when the TEN-Ts next come under review, clearly to establish the links between these hub cities and their respective ports, airports and logistics centres;
Zigmantas Balčytis, Philip Bradbourn, Spiros Danels (Spyros Danellis), Dominique Riquet, Joachim Zeller, Janusz Władysław Zemke
Zigmantas Balčytis, Philip Bradbourn, Spyros Danellis, Dominique Riquet, Joachim Zeller, Janusz Władysław Zemke
François Alfonsi, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Elie Hoarau, Danuta Maria Hübner, Juozas Imbrasas, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Mojca Kleva, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Mihailis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Lambert van Nistelrooij, Kerstin Westphal
François Alfonsi, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Elie Hoarau, Danuta Maria Hübner, Juozas Imbrasas, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Mojca Kleva, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Markus Pieper, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Michail Tremopoulos, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Kerstin Westphal
Poročevalec: Bas Eickhout
Rapporteur: Bas Eickhout
Romana Jordan Cizelj , Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko
Romana Jordan Cizelj , Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko (*) ........................26
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( *)..........25
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................38
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................36
o analizi možnosti, da se preseže ciljno 20-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov ter ocena tveganja selitve industrijskih virov toplogrednih plinov izven EU
on the analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. maja 2010 o analizi možnosti, da se preseže 20-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov ter oceni tveganja selitve industrijskih virov toplogrednih plinov izven EU ( KOM(2010)0265 ) ter spremnega dokumenta ( SEC(2010)0650 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication ‘Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage’ ( COM(2010)0265 ) and the accompanying document ( SEC(2010)0650 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Načrt za prehod na konkurenčno gospodarstvo z nizkimi emisijami ogljika do leta 2050“ ( KOM(2011)0112 ) in izjave, da „EU že ima zakonodajo, ki zagotavlja 20-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov do leta 2020 v primerjavi z ravnjo leta 1990.
– having regard to the Commission Communication ‘A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’ ( COM(2011)0112 ), and the statement that ‘The EU already has legislation in place that ensures a 20% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared with 1990 levels.
Še naprej ponuja pogojno 30-odstotno znižanje, pod pogojem, da bodo druge razvite države zagotovile primerljiva zmanjšanja, države v razvoju pa ustrezne prispevke.“,
It maintains its conditional offer of a 30% reduction, provided there are comparable reductions by other developed countries and appropriate contributions from developing countries.’,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Načrt za energetsko učinkovitost 2011“ ( KOM(2011)0109 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on an Energy Efficiency Plan 2011 ( COM(2011)0109 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojih predhodnih resolucij o podnebnih spremembah, zlasti Resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2010 o konferenci o podnebnih spremembah v Cancunu (COP16)
– having regard to its previous resolutions regarding climate change, in particular its resolution of 25 November 2010 on the climate change conference in Cancun (COP16)
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0442 . , v kateri je Parlament pozval k 30-odstotnemu zmanjšanju emisij toplogrednih plinov do leta 2020 v primerjavi z ravnmi iz leta 1990,
Text adopted, P7_TA(2010)0442 . where the Parliament called for a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 30%, compared to 1990 levels, by 2020,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1031/2010 z dne 12. novembra 2010 o časovnem načrtu, upravljanju in drugih vidikih dražbe pravic do emisije toplogrednih plinov
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 of 12 November 2010 on the timing, administration and other aspects of auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances
UL L 302, 18.11.2010, str.
OJ L 302, 18.11.2010, p.
1. na podlagi Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti
1. pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading within the Community
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta, sprejetih junija 2010, v katerih se Svet strinja, da bi morala Komisija po potrebi izvesti podrobnejšo analizo političnih možnosti ter stroškov in koristi, tudi na ravni držav članic,
– having regard to the Council Conclusions of June 2010 agreeing that the Commission should ‘conduct more detailed analysis on the policy options and costs and benefits, including at Member State level, as appropriate’,
– ob upoštevanju svežnja EU za podnebne spremembe in energijo,
– having regard to the EU climate and energy package,
– ob upoštevanju osnutka uredbe Komisije, ki v skladu z Direktivo 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta določa nekatere omejitve glede uporabe mednarodnih dobropisov iz projektov v zvezi z industrijskimi plini,
– having regard to the draft Commission Regulation determining, pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, certain restrictions applicable to the use of international credits from projects involving industrial gases,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0219/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0219/2011 ),
A. ker je svetovni podnebni cilj in cilj EU omejiti dvig temperature na 2 °C nad stanjem pred industrializacijo; ker pomeni podnebni sveženj, ki je bil sprejet decembra 2008, prvi korak k zagotavljanju ukrepanja EU v skladu s tem ciljem; ker so se države, ki predstavljajo okrog 80 % svetovnih emisij, zavezale, da bodo te emisije zmanjšale, čeprav so podpisnice okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja v Cancunu priznale, da sedanje zaveze niso dovolj za izpolnitev cilja omejitve dviga temperature na 2 °C,
A. whereas the EU’s and the global climate objective is to limit climate change to 2°C above the pre-industrial level; whereas the climate package adopted in December 2008 represents a first step towards ensuring EU action in line with this objective; whereas countries representing some 80% of global emissions have pledged to reduce emissions, although the Parties to the UNFCCC acknowledged in Cancun that current pledges are insufficient to meet the 2°C objective,
B. ker je glavni namen podnebnega in energetskega svežnja zmanjšanje emisij na stroškovno najučinkovitejši način,
B. whereas the main purpose of the climate and energy package is that of reducing emission in the most cost-effective way,