natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ker velja postopek delegiranih aktov tudi za načrtovanje drugih finančnih instrumentov na področju zunanjega delovanja, ki so v postopku pregleda – instrument stabilnosti, instrument za demokracijo in človekove pravice in instrument za industrijsko razvite države – sta parlamentarna odbora, pristojna za te instrumente (AFET in INTA) vložila enake predloge sprememb za prvo obravnavo v Parlamentu.
As the delegated acts procedure also applies to the programming of the other financing instruments in the area of external action which are currently under review - the Instrument for Stability, the Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, and the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries -, the parliamentary committees responsible for these instruments (AFET and INTA) tabled identical amendments for the first reading in Parliament.
Stališče parlamentarnih odborov o delegiranih aktih je skladno z analizo pravne službe Parlamenta ter v celoti podpira politično stališče Parlamenta, ki ga je izrazila konferenca predsednikov 9. septembra 2010: „Pogajalci parlamenta bi morali vedno vztrajati, da se delegirani akti vključijo v vse odločitve, ki izpolnjujejo merila člena 290 PDEU, zlasti glede ciljev, izbire prednostnih nalog, pričakovanih rezultatov in finančnih sredstev v širšem pomenu, da bi se ohranile pristojnosti Parlamenta na tem področju.“
Our committees' position on delegated acts is consistent with the analysis of Parliament's legal service, and is fully in line with Parliament's political position, expressed by the Conference of Presidents on 9 September 2010: " Parliament's negotiators should always insist on the inclusion of delegated acts in all decisions fulfilling the criteria of Article 290 TFEU – in particular concerning objectives, choice of priorities, expected results and financial allocations in broad terms – in order to preserve the Parliament's prerogatives in these areas ".
Medinstitucionalna pogajanja o zunanjih finančnih instrumentih torej za Parlament pomenijo več kot zgolj zagotavljanje učinkovitega parlamentarnega nadzora nad izvajanjem zakonodaje EU in s tem demokratični nadzor.
For Parliament, the interinstitutional negotiations on the external financing instruments are therefore not only about ensuring effective parliamentary control, and thus democratic control, over the implementation of EU legislation.
Njihov temeljni cilj je tudi, da vse institucije spoštujejo Pogodbo.
They also fundamentally concern the respect by all institutions of the Treaty.
Upoštevati je treba tudi, da bo izid pogajanj o uporabi delegiranih aktov za izvajanje finančnih instrumentov na področju zunanjih odnosov vzpostavil pomemben precedens za prihodnja zakonodajna pogajanja o vseh finančnih instrumentih.
And it is also worth considering that the outcome of the negotiations on the use of delegated acts for the implementation of the financing instruments in the area of external relations will establish a strong precedent for future legislative negotiations on all financing instruments.
Če izgubimo to bitko, bomo najbrž morali čakati na novo Pogodbo, da bi končno dobili pooblastila, ki nam jih Lizbonska pogodba že daje.
If we lose this battle, we may have to wait for a new Treaty in order to finally obtain the powers that the Lisbon Treaty is giving us now.
Ko je odbor DEVE uradno sprejel stališče Parlamenta v prvi obravnavi, so se februarja 2010 začela medinstitucionalna pogajanja o horizontalnem vprašanju delegiranih aktov v zunanjih finančnih instrumentih.
After formal adoption of the first reading position in DEVE, interinstitutional negotiations started in February 2010 on the horizontal issue of delegated acts in the external financing instruments.
Ker je Svet z odločno zavrnitvijo Parlamentu onemogočil prevzem vloge, ki mu pripada v skladu s členom 290 PDEU v zvezi z delovanjem finančnih instrumentov, ne da bi podal nadomestne predloge, ki bi zadostili upravičenim pričakovanjem za dejanski demokratični nadzor izvajanja instrumentov, kompromis ni bil dosežen.
Because of Council's outright refusal to grant Parliament its proper role in the operation of the financing instruments as foreseen in Article 290 TFEU, without making any alternative proposals to accommodate Parliament's legitimate aspiration for proper democratic scrutiny of the implementation of the instruments, no compromise was reached.
Parlament je prvo obravnavo zaključil 21. oktobra 2010 s sprejetjem zakonodajnih resolucij o vseh zunanjih finančnih instrumentih, pri čemer je velika večina glasovala v podporo uvedbe postopka delegiranih aktov.
On 21 October 2010, Parliament concluded its first reading by adopting legislative resolutions on all the external financing instruments, with a large majority supporting the introduction of the delegated acts procedure.
Svet je 10. decembra 2010 uradno sprejel stališče o treh instrumentih od štirih, tudi o instrumentu za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja.
On 10 December 2010, Council formally adopted its position on three of the four instruments, including the DCI.
V stališču Svet zavrača vse predloge sprememb iz prve obravnave, ki skušajo uvesti delegirane akte v instrumente, ne da bi predlagal alternativen postopek.
In its position Council rejects all first reading amendments which attempt to introduce delegated acts into the instruments, without proposing any alternative procedure.
Kar zadeva vmesni pregled instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja, je Svet sprejel samo nekatere tehnične spremembe, ki jih je predlagal Parlament.
As regards the mid-term review of the DCI, only some technical amendments proposed by Parliament were accepted by Council.
Svet je pozval Parlament, naj pred koncem leta 2010 (torej brez pogajanj) sprejme skupno stališče Sveta, kar (in to Svet dobro ve) ni mogoče brez popolnega neupoštevanja notranjih postopkov Parlamenta.
Council calls for Parliament to adopt before the end of 2010 (i.e. without any negotiation) Council's Common Position, which - as Council very well knows - would not be possible without completely disregarding Parliament's internal procedures.
Prav tako se Svet ni posvetoval s Parlamentom, da bi se skupaj dogovorila o najprimernejšem trenutku za predajo menja, kar bi bilo potrebno v skladu s členom 20 sporazuma o dobrem medinstitucionalnem sodelovanju.
Council also did not consult Parliament to determine jointly the most suitable moment to transmit its position, as would have been required in accordance with Article 20 of the agreement on good interinstitutional cooperation in the field of codecision.
Ker so bila zaman vsa prizadevanja, da bi med trialogi o teh zadevah in v stikih na tehnični ravni dosegli napredek, je mnenje poročevalca, da mora Parlament v drugi obravnavi čim prej ponoviti in sprejeti svoje mnenje o delegiranih aktih.
As all attempts to move forward on the dossiers during trilogues and technical level contacts have failed, your rapporteur is of the opinion that Parliament should adopt and reiterate as quickly as possible its position regarding the delegated acts in second reading.
Ker sozakonodajalec ne ponuja alternativnih predlogov in ker je treba ukrepati hitro ter v interesu upravičencev, bi moral Parlament ponovno potrditi svoje stališče iz prve obravnave, ne da bi se v tej fazi spustil v novo razpravo o posameznih predlogih sprememb.
Given the lack of any alternative proposal from the co-legislator, and the need to act fast in the interest of the beneficiaries, Parliament should reconfirm its position of first reading without at this stage entering into a new debate about individual amendments.
Hkrati je treba Svet pozvati, naj se čim hitreje odzove na stališče Parlamenta v drugi obravnavi in zagotovi, da se poišče rešitev in se sredstva čim hitreje deblokirajo.
At the same time, Council should be called on to react as quickly as possible to Parliament's second reading position in order to ensure that a solution can be found and that funds can be unblocked as soon as possible
Za zaključek in glede na navedene pravne in politične argumente, poročevalec priporoča ponovno uvedbo vseh predlogov sprememb iz prve obravnave, ki jih Svet ni sprejel.
In conclusion, and in light of the legal and political arguments outlined above, your rapporteur recommends reinstating all the amendments from the first reading which were not accepted by the Council.
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Corina Creţu, Véronique De Keyser, Nirj Deva, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Eva Joly, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Patrice Tirolien, Ivo Vajgl, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Ricardo Cortés Lastra, Corina Creţu, Véronique De Keyser, Nirj Deva, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Eva Joly, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Theocharous, Patrice Tirolien, Ivo Vajgl, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma, v imenu Evropske unije, med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Republiko Islandijo, Kraljevino Norveško, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi s Skladom za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on supplementary rules in relation to the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013
Poročevalec: Wim van de Camp
Rapporteur: Wim van de Camp
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (07853/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (07853/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Republiko Islandijo, Kraljevino Norveško, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi s Skladom za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013 (15954/2009),
– having regard to the draft agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on supplementary rules in relation to the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 (15954/2009),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 77(2)(d) in členom 218(6), drugi pododstavek, točka (a), točka (v), Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0101/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 77(2)(d) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) , point (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0101/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7-0007/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7‑0007/2010 ),
Sonia Alfano, Roberta Angelilli, Rita Borsellino, Emine Bozkurt, Simon Busuttil, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Louis Michel, Claude Moraes, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Carmen Romero López, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Renate Sommer, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Sonia Alfano, Roberta Angelilli, Rita Borsellino, Emine Bozkurt, Simon Busuttil, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Louis Michel, Claude Moraes, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Georgios Papanikolaou, Carmen Romero López, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Renate Sommer, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Ioan Enciu, Monika Hohlmeier, Stanimir Ilčev (Stanimir Ilchev), Ádám Kósa, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Jean Lambert, Petru Constantin Luhan, Norica Nicolai, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Ernst Strasser, Marie-Christine Vergiat
Edit Bauer, Ioan Enciu, Monika Hohlmeier, Stanimir Ilchev, Ádám Kósa, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Jean Lambert, Petru Constantin Luhan, Norica Nicolai, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Ernst Strasser, Marie-Christine Vergiat
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi v imenu Evropske unije Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda
on the draft Council Decisions on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi v imenu Evropske unije Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda.
on the draft Council Decisions on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis
– ob upoštevanju predloga sklepov Sveta (06077/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decisions (06077/2010),
– ob upoštevanju predloga Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda (16462/2006)
– having regard to the draft Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (16462/2006),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve po odobritvi, ki jo je podal Svet v skladu s členi 16, 74, 77(2), 79(2)(a) in (c), 82(1)(b) in (d), 87(2), 87(3), 89, 114 in točke (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0141/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 16, 74, 77(2), 79(2)(a) and (c), 82(1)(b) and (d), 87(2), 87(3), 89, 114 and Article 218(6) second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0141/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7–0008/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7‑0008/2011 ),
Schengenski sporazum so 14. junija 1986 podpisali Belgija, Nemčija, Francija, Luksemburg in Nizozemska.
The Schengen agreement was signed on the 14 June 1985 by Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.
Sporazum in konvencija, ki je bila sprejeta leta 1990 za njegovo izvrševanje, sta določila ukinitev sistematičnih mejnih kontrol med državami, kar omogoča prosto gibanje ljudi.
The agreement, and the subsequent convention adopted in 1990 to implement it agreed to abolish systematic border controls between the countries, allowing free movement of persons.
Schengenska konvencija je ukinila kontrolo na mednarodnih mejah držav podpisnic ter ustvarila enotno zunanjo mejo s skupnimi pravili o kontrolah na zunanjih mejah, skupno vizumsko politiko, policijskim in pravosodnim sodelovanjem in ustanovitvijo Schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS).
The Schengen Convention abolished checks at the internal borders of the signatory states and created a single external border with common rules on external border controls, a common visa policy, police and judicial cooperation and the establishment of the Schengen Information System (SIS).
Schengensko sodelovanje je bilo leta 1999 z uveljavitvijo Amsterdamske pogodbe vključeno v pravni in institucionalni okvir Evropske unije.
With the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1999, the Schengen cooperation was integrated into the European Union legal and institutional framework.
Sedaj schengensko območje vključuje 25 držav članic: med državami članicami EU so to Avstrija, Belgija, Danska, Francija, Finska, Nemčija, Grčija, Italija, Luksemburg, Nizozemska, Portugalska, Španija, Švedska, Češka republika, Estonija, Madžarska, Latvija, Litva, Malta, Poljska, Slovaška in Slovenija, pridružene pa so tudi tri članice, ki niso članice EU, in sicer Norveška, Islandija in Švica.
Currently, the Schengen area comprises 25 Schengen Member States: the EU countries Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia as well as the three associated non EU countries, Norway, Iceland and Switzerland.
Bolgarija, Romunija in Ciper trenutno le delno izvršujejo schengenski pravni red, zato se kontrole na mejah s temi tremi državami članicami še vedno opravljajo.
Bulgaria, Romania and Cyprus only partially apply the Schengen acquis at the moment and checks are therefore still carried out at the borders with these three Member States.
Preden ima država možnost, da v celoti izvršuje schengenska pravila, je treba oceniti njeno pripravljenost na štirih področjih: zračne meje, vizumi, policijsko sodelovanje in varstvo podatkov.
Before being able to implement fully the Schengen rules, each state needs to have its preparedness assessed in four areas: air borders, visas, police cooperation, and data protection.
Postopek ocenjevanja vključuje vprašalnik in obiske strokovnjakov EU na izbranih krajih, kot so konzulati, meje itd. držav, ki se ocenjujejo.
This evaluation process involves a questionnaire and visits of EU experts to selected places, such as consulates, borders, etc, of the country under assessment.
V tem trenutku je prosto gibanje zagotovljeno na ozemlju z 42.673 kilometri zunanje morske meje in 7.721 kilometri zunanje kopenske meje, kar vključuje 25 držav in 400 milijonov državljanov.
At this moment, the free movement is guaranteed on a territory with 42,673 km of external sea and 7,721 km of land borders, covering 25 countries and 400 million citizens.
Odnosi s tretjimi državami
Relations with third countries
S postopno širitvijo schengenskega območja so se tretje države, ki imajo posebne odnose z EU, vključile v schengensko sodelovanje.
The gradual expansion of the Schengen area has led third countries that have particular relations with the EU to take part in Schengen cooperation.
Pogoj za vključitev držav, ki niso članice EU, v schengenski pravni red, je sporazum o prostem gibanju oseb med temi državami in EU.
The precondition for association with the Schengen acquis by non-EU countries is an agreement on free movement of persons between those states and the EU.
Za te države sodelovanje pomeni:
For these countries this participation involves:
- da so vključene v območje brez kontrol na notranjih mejah;
- being included in the area without checks at internal borders;
- da izvajajo določbe schengenskega pravnega reda in vseh aktov v zvezi s Schengnom, ki so sprejeti na tej podlagi;
- applying the provisions of the Schengen acquis and of all Schengen-relevant texts adopted pursuant to it;
- da so vključene v odločanje o aktih, povezanih s Schengnom.
- being involved in decisions relating to Schengen-relevant texts;
V praksi to sodelovanje poteka v obliki mešanih odborov, ki se srečujejo ob srečanju delovnih skupin Sveta EU.
In practice, this involvement takes the form of mixed committees that meet alongside the working parties of the EU Council.
Vključujejo predstavnike vlad držav članic, Komisije in vlad tretjih držav.
They comprise representatives of the Member States' governments, the Commission and the governments of third countries.
Pridružene države torej sodelujejo v razpravah o razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, vendar ne glasujejo.
Associated countries therefore participate in discussions on the development of the Schengen acquis, but do not take part in voting.
Določeni so bili postopki za obveščanje o prihodnjih ukrepih ali aktih in za njihovo sprejemanje.
Procedures for notifying and accepting future measures or acts have been laid down.
Pristop Lihtenštajna k Schengnu
Liechtenstein accession to Schengen
Lihtenštajn je kopenska alpska mikrodržava, obdana s kopenskimi državami; nahaja se v zahodni Evropi, na zahodu in jugu meji na Švico, na vzhodu pa na Avstrijo.
Liechtenstein is a doubly landlocked alpine microstate in Western Europe, bordered by Switzerland to the west and south and by Austria to the east.
Površina Lihtenštajna je 160 km², ima 35.000 prebivalcev in najvišji bruto domači proizvod na osebo na svetu.
It has an area of 160 km2, an estimated population of 35.000 and has the highest gross domestic product per person in the world.
Lihtenštajn je od svojega pristopa k Evropskemu gospodarskemu prostoru (EGS) leta 1995 stalno vključen v evropsko trgovinsko območje.
Liechtenstein has been steadily integrating into the European trade area since its accession to the European Economic Area (EEA) in 1995.
98,4 % direktiv EU je vključil v domače pravo.
The jurisdiction has now implemented 98,4% of EU directives into domestic law.
Lihtenštajn je tudi del enotnega trga, na katerem za vse države članice veljajo enaka temeljna pravila.
Liechtenstein is also part of the Single Market, in which the same basic rules apply to all participating states.
Protokol med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda je bil podpisan 28. februarja 2008.
The signature of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis took place on the 28th February 2008.