natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· Uredba (ES) št. 1069/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode in pridobljene proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi, ter razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002 (Uredba o živalskih stranskih proizvodih)
· Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (animal by-products Regulation)
· Uredba (ES) št. 183/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. januarja 2005 o zahtevah glede higiene krme
· Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 laying down requirements for feed hygiene
· Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 396/2005 z dne 23. februarja 2005 o mejnih vrednostih ostankov pesticidov v ali na hrani in krmi rastlinskega in živalskega izvora ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS
· Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC
Iz tega sledi, da bi lahko predlog jemali kot ukrep s fitosanitarnega in/ali veterinarskega področja, katerega neposreden cilj je varovanje javnega zdravja.
It follows therefore that the proposal could be considered as being a measure in the phytosanitary and/or veterinary field which has as its direct objective the protection of public health.
IV - Sklep in priporočilo
IV - Conclusion and recommendation
Glede na povedano bi bilo treba zaključiti, da dejstvo, da je Sodišče pred uvedbo člena 168 PDEU leta 1992 menilo, da je člen 31 Pogodbe Euratom primerna pravna podlaga za uredbo, ki naj bi bila prenovljena, ni močan argument za izključitev uporabe člena 168(4)(b) – ki takrat ni obstajal in ki zadeva varovanje javnega zdravja – kot pravne podlage.
In light of the foregoing analysis it should be concluded that the fact that before the introduction of Article 168 TFEU in 1992 the Court considered Article 31 EAEC to be the appropriate legal basis for the regulation which it is proposed to recast is not a strong argument for ruling out recourse to Article 168 (4)(b) - which did not exist at the time and which concerns the protection of public health - as the legal basis.
Na seji 22. novembra 2010 je Odbor za pravne zadeve glede na to soglasno sklenil
At its meeting of 22 November 2010 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, by unanimity
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Klaus-Heiner Lehne (predsednik), Luigi Berlinguer (podpredsednik), Raffaele Baldassarre (podpredsednik), Evelyn Regner (podpredsednica), Sebastian Valentin Bodu (podpredsednik), Eva Lichtenberger (poročevalka), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Francesco Enrico Speroni, József Szájer, Alexandra Thein, Cecilia Wikström in Tadeusz Zwiefka. priporočiti, da naj bo podlaga za predlog člen 168(4)(b) PDEU.
The following were present for the final vote: Klaus-Heiner Lehne (Chair), Luigi Berlinguer (Vice-Chair), Raffaele Baldassarre (Vice-Chair), Evelyn Regner (Vice-Chair), Sebastian Valentin Bodu (Vice-Chair), Eva Lichtenberger (rapporteur), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Francesco Enrico Speroni, József Szájer, Alexandra Thein, Cecilia Wikström and Tadeusz Zwiefka. , to recommend that the proposal be based on Article 168)(4)(b) TFEU.
Najvišja dovoljena stopnja radioaktivnega onesnaženja živil in krme po jedrski nesreči ali kateri koli drugi radiološki nevarnosti (prenovitev)
Maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency (recast)
Maria Badia i Cutchet, Françoise Grossetête, András Gyürk, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Yannick Jadot, Ivailo Kalfin, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Alajos Mészáros, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Peter Skinner, Hannes Swoboda
Maria Badia i Cutchet, Françoise Grossetête, András Gyürk, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Yannick Jadot, Ivailo Kalfin, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Alajos Mészáros, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Peter Skinner, Hannes Swoboda
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Ženevskega sporazuma o trgovini z bananami med Evropsko unijo ter Brazilijo, Kolumbijo, Kostariko, Ekvadorjem, Gvatemalo, Hondurasom, Mehiko, Nikaragvo, Panamo, Perujem in Venezuelo ter Sporazuma o trgovini z bananami med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Geneva Agreement on Trade in Bananas between the European Union and Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru and Venezuela and of an Agreement on Trade in Bananas between the European Union and the United States of America
Poročevalka: Francesca Balzani
Rapporteur: Francesca Balzani
MNENJE Odbora za razvoj ...........................................................................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................10
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................14
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................13
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (07782/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (07782/2010),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 207(4) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0148/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0148/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 80 in 90(8) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A7–0002/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A7-0002/2011 ),
Trgovina z bananami
Trade in bananas
Banane so po rižu, pšenici in koruzi četrti najpomembnejši pridelek na svetu in zelo veliko prispevajo k prehranski varnosti.
Bananas are the world’s fourth most important crop, after rice, wheat and maize, and make a major contribution to food security.
Le malo držav, ki pridelujejo banane, sodeluje v mednarodni trgovini z bananami.
Only a limited number of banana producing countries are involved in the international trade in bananas.
Nadzor trgovine z bananami je v rokah omejenega števila podjetij, pri čemer več kot 80 % vse mednarodne trgovine z bananami nadzira le pet velikih večnacionalnih podjetij.
Control of the banana trade is concentrated in the hands of a limited number of companies, with just five major multinationals controlling more than 80% of all internationally traded bananas.
V zadnjih letih pa se je moč večnacionalnih podjetij, ki se ukvarjajo s trgovino z bananami, občutno zmanjšala zaradi vpliva veleblagovnic na nekaterih glavnih trgih EU, zlasti v Veliki Britaniji.
In recent years, however, the power of the banana multinationals has been eclipsed by the power of the supermarkets in some key EU markets, notably the UK.
Leta 2008 so potrošniki v EU kupili več kot 5,4 milijona ton banan.
In 2008, EU consumers bought more than 5.4 million tonnes of bananas.
EU je uvozila skoraj 90 % vseh zaužitih banan in sicer 72, 5 % iz Latinske Amerike, 17 % pa iz afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (držav AKP).
The EU imported almost 90% of the bananas it consumed (72.5% from Latin America, 17% from African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries).
Preostalih 11% je zagotovilo pet držav EU: Ciper, Francija (čezmorska departmaja Guadeloupe in Martinik), Grčija, Portugalska (Madeira in celina), ter Španija (Kanarski otoki).
Five EU countries supplied the remaining 11%: Cyprus; France (the overseas departments of Guadeloupe and Martinique); Greece; Portugal (Madeira and the mainland); and Spain (the Canary Islands).
Rešitev spora glede banan
Resolution of the banana dispute
Decembra 2009 so se EU, skupina latinskoameriških držav in Združene države dogovorile o tarifah EU za uvoz banan in tako končale enega od najdaljših in najhujših sporov v novejši zgodovini večstranskega trgovinskega sistema.
On 15 December 2009, the EU, a group of Latin American countries and the United States reached an agreement on the EU’s tariffs on banana imports, bringing to a close one of the most protracted and bitter disputes in the multilateral trading system’s recent history.
Politika EU za uvoz banan je bila tema desetletja dolgega spora na WTO, ki je EU ločila od številnih latinskoameriških pridelovalk banan in ZDA..
EU banana import policies had been the subject of a decade-long row at the WTO, putting the EU against several Latin American banana producers and the US.
Pascal Lamy je toplo pozdravil zaključek enega tehnično najbolj zapletenega, politično občutljivega in trgovinsko pomembnega pravnega spora, ki je bil kdaj koli obravnavan v WTO.
Pascal Lamy warmly welcomed the end of “one of the most technically complex, politically sensitive and commercially meaningful legal disputes ever brought to the WTO.”
Spor se je vrtel okrog tega, da je EU uvozu banan iz držav AKP dajala prednost pred bananami iz Latinske Amerike.
At issue was the treatment the EU gave to the import of bananas from the ACP countries in preference to bananas from Latin America.
Uvozni režim EU za banane je dovoljeval 775.000 ton brezcarinskega uvoza tega sadeža iz držav AKP letno, medtem ko je za vse preostale izvoznike veljala tarifa 176 EUR/tono (države dobaviteljice z največjimi ugodnostmi).
In fact, the EU’s banana import regime allowed 775,000 tonnes of the fruit from ACP countries to enter the EU duty-free each year, with a €176/t tariff on bananas from all other exporters (most-favoured nation (MFN) suppliers).
Številne latinskoameriške države, med njimi tudi nekaj največjih svetovnih izvoznic banan, so dolgo vztrajale, da tak uvozni režim pomeni nezakonito diskriminacijo v korist banan iz držav AKP in da se s tem kršijo pravila WTO o količinskih omejitvah.
Many Latin American countries, which include some of the world’s biggest banana exporters, long insisted that this import regime illegally discriminated in favour of bananas from ACP countries and violated WTO rules on quantitative restrictions.
Spor je privedel do večkratnih sodnih odločitev sosvetov za reševanje sporov, pritožbenega organa in posebnih razsodnikov, zato je EU morala ponovno pregledati svoje politike.
The dispute resulted in multiple legal rulings by dispute panels, the Appellate Body and special arbitrators and the EU had to revise its policies.
Sporazum zajema tri osnovne elemente:
The agreement consists of three basic components:
- dogovorjen časovni razpored znižanja tarif za izvoznice banan z največjimi ugodnostmi;
- an agreed schedule of tariff reductions for most-favoured nation (MFN) banana exporters;
- dogovor o tem, kako obravnavati tropske pridelke in pridelke z ukinjenimi preferenciali v širših pogajanjih WTO;
- agreement on how to deal with "tropical products" and products subject to "preference erosion" in the wider WTO negotiations;
- finančni paket pomoči v višini 190 milijonov EUR izvoznicam banan AKP, ki se imenuje program spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane.
- a financial package, amounting to €190 million, of assistance to ACP banana exporters, to be known as the Banana Accompanying Measures (BAM) programme.
Spori glede banan so razburkali razmere za pridelavo in trgovino v zadevnih državah.
The disputes on bananas have destabilised the climate for production and trade in the countries concerned.
Zaradi sporazuma bo svetovni trg z bananami postal bolj predvidljiv in stabilen in kot tak spodbujal vlaganje in rast, povečala pa se bo tudi pozornost glede širših pogojev pridelovanja v dobavni verigi banan.
The deal will make the global market in bananas more predictable and stable, and thereby encourage investment and growth, and increased attention to wider production condition issues in the banana supply chains.
Znižanja tarif
Tariff reductions
V skladu z doseženim dogovorom bo EU do leta 2017 postopoma zmanjševala tarife za izvoz banan iz Latinske Amerike s sedanjih 176 EUR/tono na 114 EUR/tono, kar bo tudi končni znesek.
Under the terms of the deal, the EU will gradually cut its tariffs on Latin American banana exports from the current level of €176/t to €114/t by 2017, when it will reach its final level of €114/t.
Prvo znižanje v višini 28 EUR/tono, ki se je ob parafiranju sporazuma dne 15. decembra 2009 uporabilo za nazaj, je zmanjšalo tarifno stopnjo na 148 EUR/tono.
A first cut of €28/t, which was applied retroactively as of 15 December 2009, the date of initialling of the Agreement, reduced the tariff to €148/t.
Tarife se bodo nato sedem let na začetku vsakega leta zmanjševale v letnih obrokih od 1. januarja 2011 naprej (143 EUR, 136 EUR, 132 EUR, 127 EUR, 122 EUR, 117 EUR, 114 EUR).
The tariff will then fall again at the start of each year for seven years in annual instalments (€143, €136, €132, €127, €122, €117, €114), starting on 1 January, 2011.
Če med krogom pogajanj v Dohi ne bo dogovora, bo EU za obdobje do dveh let zamrznila zniževanje.
Should there be no agreement in the Doha Round negotiations, then the EU will freeze its cuts for up to two years.
To pomeni, da če ne bo dogovora, ko bo EU svoje tarifa znižala na 132 EUR/tono, za obdobje do dveh let ne bo nadaljevala z zniževanjem, torej največ do konca leta 2015, nato pa bo EU najkasneje od leta 2016 nadaljevala z vsakoletnim zniževanjem tarif v skladu z dogovorom, dokler tarifa najkasneje 1. januarja 2019 ne bo znašala 114 EUR/tono.
This means that should there be no agreement once the EU cuts its tariffs to €132 per tonne, it will make no further cuts for up to two years, until the end of 2015 at the latest, then from 2016 at the latest, the EU will continue cutting its tariff each year, as agreed until the tariff reaches €114/t on 1 January 2019 at the latest.
Ta sporazum zaključuje desetletja sporov s klavzulo, ki pravi, da bodo latinskoameriške izvoznice banan opustile vse tožbe proti EU v WTO, ko bo WTO potrdila nov časovni razpored tarif EU, ko bodo latinskoameriške države dobaviteljice banan zaključile vse spore glede banan z EU v WTO ter vse tožbe, ki so jih vložile proti EU potem, ko so se EU pridružile nove članice, ali ko je EU leta 2006 spremenila svojo tarifo za banane, in v krogu pogajanj iz Dohe ne bodo zahtevale nadaljnjih znižanj tarif.
The agreement lays to rest decades of conflict, with a clause stating that Latin American banana exporters will drop all actions against the EU in the WTO: "once the WTO certifies the EU’s new tariff schedule, Latin American banana-supplying countries will drop all their disputes on bananas with the EU at the WTO, and any claims they made against the EU after new member countries joined the Union, or when the EU changed its banana tariff in 2006" and will not seek further tariff reductions on bananas in the Doha Round.
Za banane iz držav AKP bo tudi v prihodnje veljal brezcarinski dostop do trga EU brez količinskih omejitev skladno s posebnimi trgovinskimi in razvojnimi sporazumu, vendar pa bodo verjetno z znižanjem tarif EU izgubile tržni delež v primerjavi z učinkovitejšimi latinskoameriškimi proizvajalkami.
Bananas from ACP countries will continue to enjoy duty-free and quota-free access to the EU's market under separate trade and development agreements, but are likely to lose market share to more efficient Latin American producers as the EU tariff slides lower.
Tropski pridelki in pridelki z ukinjenimi preferenciali
"Tropical" and "Preference Erosion" products
Poleg tega so se EU, države AKP in latinskoameriške države dogovorile o pristopu do tropskih pridelkov in pridelkov z ukinjenimi preferenciali v tekočih pogajanjih o Razvojni agendi iz Dohe (DDA).
In parallel, the EU, ACP and Latin American countries agreed on an approach on the so-called "tropical" and "preference erosion" products in the on-going DDA negotiations.
Za tropske pridelke bodo veljala večja znižanja tarif, medtem ko bodo znižanja tarif za "pridelke z ukinjenimi preferenciali v interesu držav AKP potekala v relativno daljšem obdobju.
"Tropical products" will be subject to deeper tariff cuts, while tariff cuts for "preference erosion" products of interest to ACP countries will be conducted over a relatively longer period.
S tem sporazumom se EU dokončno zavezuje glede tarif, ki jih bo uporabljala za uvoz banan po krogu pogajanj iz Dohe.
The agreement is the EU's final commitment on the tariffs it will apply to banana imports following the Doha Round negotiations.
Program za podporo pridelovalcev banan v državah AKP
Banana support programme for the ACP
Od leta 1994 je EU državam AKP, ki so izvoznice banan, zagotovila več kot 450 milijonov EUR, da bi se lažje prilagodile spremembam, pridelovale banane na bolj konkurenčen način ali povečale raznovrstnost svojega gospodarstva še na druga področja.
Since 1994, the EU has provided more than €450m to ACP banana-exporting countries to help them adapt to changes, to produce bananas more competitively or to diversify their economies into other areas.
Poleg redne pomoči EU bodo države AKP, ki so glavne izvoznice banan, iz proračuna EU prejele do 190 milijonov EUR, da bi se lažje prilagodile novi tarifi.
In addition to regular EU aid, the main ACP banana-exporting countries will receive up to €190 million from the EU budget to help them adjust to the new tariff.
Komisija bo s proračunskim organom preučila možnost, da bi ta znesek povečali za 10 milijonov EUR, če bodo v letnih proračunskih postopkih na voljo ustrezna sredstva.
The Commission will examine, together with the budgetary authority, the possibility of topping up this amount by €10 million if the corresponding credits become available in the annual budget procedures.
Pomoč bo namenjena izboljšanju konkurenčnosti, gospodarske raznovrstnosti in zmanjševanju družbenih posledic sprememb.
The aid will be aimed at improving competitiveness, economic diversification and mitigating the social consequences of adjustment.
Program spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane bo veljal za deset držav AKP, ki so izvoznice banan (Belize, Kamerun, Slonokoščena obala, Dominika, Dominikanska republika, Gana, Jamajka, Sveta Lucija, Saint Vincent in Grenadine ter Surinam) vključno z dvema netradicionalnima izvoznicama (Gana in Dominikanska republika).
The Banana Accompanying Measures programme will apply to ten ACP banana exporters (Belize, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ghana, Jamaica, St Lucia, St Vincent & the Grenadines, and Suriname), including two non-traditional exporters (Ghana and Dominican Republic).
Poleg že znane usmerjenosti na konkurenčnost in raznovrstnost bo program skušal zajeti tudi širša vprašanja zaposlovanja, izobraževanja, zdravstva in okoljskega prilagajanja.
In addition to the traditional focus on competitiveness and diversification, the programme will also seek to address broader employment, educational, health and environmental adjustment issues.
Program bi se moral začeti izvajati leta 2011 in trajati do leta 2013.
Implementation of the programme should begin in 2011 and run through 2013.
V okviru programa se bodo izvajali naslednji ukrepi: podpora naložbam v izboljšanje konkurenčnosti; podpora politikam za povečanje gospodarske raznovrstnosti; podpora večjim družbenim, gospodarskim in okoljskim spremembam.
Measures supported under the programme will involve: support to investments in competitiveness improvements; support to economic diversification policies; support to broader social, economic and environmental adjustments.
Podprte ukrepe bosta skupaj določili vlada upravičenka in Komisija.
The measures to be supported will be determined jointly by the beneficiary government and the Commission.
Dodelitve državam bodo temeljile na treh merilih:
Country allocations will be based on three criteria:
– obseg trgovine z bananami z EU;
- the volume of the banana trade with the EU;
– pomen, ki ga ima izvoz banan v EU za gospodarstvo zadevne države;
- the importance of bananas exports to the EU to the country’s economy;
– razvojna stopnja države (na primer po indeksu človekovega razvoja).
- the level of development of the country (such as its HDI rating).
Dodelitve povprečno znašajo 5 milijonov EUR na državo upravičenko letno.
The allocation amounts to an average of €5 million per beneficiary country per annum.
Vprašanja, povezana z državami AKP
ACP concerns
Tradicionalne države AKP, ki so izvoznice banan, so zaskrbljene zaradi resnih socialnih, gospodarskih in političnih motenj, ki bi jih lahko povzročili sporazumi o bananah.
Traditional ACP banana exporters have been concerned about the serious social, economic and political dislocation that could result from the banana agreements.
Države AKP menijo, da bi za to, da bi čim bolj zmanjšali morebitne izgube držav AKP, ki so izvoznice banan, zaradi sporazuma o bananah in preostalih dvostranskih tarifnih koncesij, odobrenih latinskoameriškim izvoznicam banan, potrebovali bistveno višjo raven finančne podpore za pridelovanje in trgovinske uskladitvene ukrepe v državah AKP, izvoznicah banan.
ACP believe that in order to minimise potential losses to ACP banana exporters following the banana deal and other bilateral tariff concessions granted to Latin American banana exporters, a far larger level of financial support to production and trade adjustment measures in ACP banana-exporting countries would be needed.
Evropski pridelovalci banan
European banana producers
Podpora za sektor banan EU se zagotavlja s pomočjo sredstev programa POSEI (Program posebnih možnosti za oddaljene in otoške regije).
The support for the EU banana sector is provided through the POSEI (Programme d'options spécifiques à l'éloignement et l'insularité) envelope.
Kot rezultat reforme skupne ureditve trga EU za banane iz leta 2006 prejemajo evropski pridelovalci banan v najbolj oddaljenih regijah 279 milijonov EUR letno v okviru tega programa.
As a result of the reform of the EU's Common Market Organisation for bananas in 2006, European banana producers in the outermost regions receive €279 million annually within this envelope.
Ker pa je bila reforma programa POSEI izvedena v letu 2006, niso bila upoštevana kasnejša znižanja tarif za uvožene banane.
However, as the reform of POSEI was carried out in 2006, it did not take into account the future reductions of tariffs for imported bananas.
Zato ni jasno, ali bo s sedanjimi sredstvi programa POSEI mogoče zagotoviti, da bodo evropski pridelovalci banan lahko vzdržali pritisk, ki nastaja zaradi vse večje liberalizacije svetovne trgovine z bananami.
It is therefore not clear whether the current POSEI envelope is sufficient to ensure that European banana producers are able to withstand the pressures created by the increasing liberalization of the global trade in bananas.
Njihovo konkurenčnost in dejanski obstoj lahko ogrozijo sporazumi Svetovne trgovinske organizacije o trgovini z bananami.
Their competitiveness and their actual existence may therefore be threatened as a result of the WTO Agreements on Trade in Banana.
Dvostranski sporazumi
Bilateral accords
Zadnji dvostranski sporazumi, sklenjeni s Kolumbijo in Perujem ter Srednjo Ameriko (Kostarika, Salvador, Gvatemala, Honduras, Nikaragva in Panama) zagotavljajo celo boljšo preferencialno obravnavo izvoza iz teh držav (dajatev 75 EUR/ tono do leta 2020 v nizu obročnih znižanj).
The recent bilateral agreements concluded with Colombia and Peru, and Central America (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama) offer a even better preferential treatment to exports from these countries (a duty of €75/t by 2020, in a series of incremental reductions).