natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– analizo razpoložljivosti proizvodov znotraj skupine proizvodov, ki ne vsebujejo snovi pripravkov ali mešanic, ki so v skladu z direktivo 67/584/EGS, direktivo 1999/45/ES ali direktivo (ES) št. 1278/2008 razvrščeni med zelo strupene, strupene, nevarne za okolje, rakotvorne, mutagene ali strupene za razmnoževanje, ali snovi iz člena 57 uredbe 1907/2006/ES (REACH).
- Analysis of the availability of products within a product group without substances , preparations or mixtures classified as very toxic, toxic, dangerous to the environment, carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction (CMR), in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC , Directive 1999/45/EC or Regulation (EC) No. 1278/2008 , or substances referred to in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH).
Merila morajo upoštevati načelo nadomestitve.
Criteria should take into account the substitution principle.
Priloga I – del A – točka 1 – pododstavek 2
Annex I – part A – point 1 – subparagraph 2
Predhodno poročilo je na voljo na spletni strani Komisije, namenjeni znaku za okolje, kjer je med oblikovanjem meril mogoče podati pripombe ali poročilo uporabiti kot vir.
The preliminary report shall be made available on the Commission's dedicated Ecolabel website for comment and reference during the development of the criteria.
Predhodno poročilo je na voljo na spletni strani Komisije, namenjeni znaku za okolje, ki mora biti na voljo v vseh 23 uradnih jezikih, kjer je med oblikovanjem meril mogoče podati pripombe ali poročilo uporabiti kot vir.
The preliminary report shall be made available on the Commission's dedicated Ecolabel website , which must be made available in all 23 official languages, for comment and reference during the development of the criteria.
Vsako podjetje v posamezni državi članici mora imeti dostop do informacij o znaku na uradni spletni strani.
Every company in a Member State must be able to access information on the logo on the official website.
Priloga I – del A – točka 2 – alinea 1
Annex I – Part A – point 2 – indent 1
– merila temeljijo na okoljski uspešnosti proizvoda , ki je eden najuspešnejših proizvodov na trgu, ves čas njegovega življenjskega kroga, ter, kolikor je mogoče, ustrezajo 10 % najuspešnejših proizvodov, ki so na voljo na trgu ;
- they shall be based on the environmental performance throughout the life-cycle of the product of the best performing products on the market and correspond, as far as possible, to 10% of the best performing products available on the market;
– merila temeljijo na okoljski uspešnosti proizvoda, ki je v času, ko se jih sprejme , eden najuspešnejših proizvodov na notranjem trgu, ves čas njegovega življenjskega kroga;
- they shall be based on the environmental performance throughout the life-cycle of the best performing products on the internal market at the moment of their adoption.
– merila ustrezajo deležu najuspešnejših proizvodov, ki so na voljo na trgu v času, ko se jih sprejme.
- they shall correspond to a certain percentage of the best performing products available on the internal market at the moment of their adoption.
Točen odstotek se določi s fleksibilnostjo za vsak primer posebej glede na kategorijo proizvodov, običajno med 10 in 20 %, v vsakem primeru pa zato, da bi se nagradili in spodbujali okolju najprijaznejši proizvodi na tržišču in da bi se potrošnikom zagotovilo dovolj izbire proizvodov z znakom za okolje;
The exact percentage shall be defined with flexibility on a case-by-case basis depending on the product category, normally between 10 to 20 %, and in any case with the aim of rewarding and promoting the most environmentally friendly products on the market and ensuring that consumers are provided with a sufficient choice of Ecolabel products.
Pomembno je, da je znak za okolje spodbuda za nadaljnje inovacije.
It is important that Ecolabel remains a driver for further innovation.
Priloga I – del A – točka 2 – pododstavek 2 – alinea 2
Annex I – part A – point 2 – subparagraph 2 – indent 2
– merila temeljijo na najpomembnejših vplivih proizvoda na okolje in so, kolikor je razumno mogoče, izražena s ključnimi tehničnimi kazalniki okoljske uspešnosti ter so primerna za ocenjevanje v skladu s predpisi te uredbe;
-they shall be based on the most significant environmental impacts of the product, be expressed as far as is reasonably possible via technical key environmental performance indicators of the product, and be suitable for assessment according to the rules of this Regulation;
– merila temeljijo na vplivih proizvoda na okolje in so, kolikor je razumno mogoče, izražena s ključnimi tehničnimi kazalniki okoljske uspešnosti ter so primerna za ocenjevanje v skladu s predpisi te uredbe;
- they shall be based on the environmental impacts of the product, be expressed as far as is reasonably possible via technical key environmental performance indicators of the product, and be suitable for assessment according to the rules of this Regulation;
Priznanje zgolj 10 % najuspešnejših v skupini proizvodov ni primerno za vse skupine proizvodov.
Only rewarding the 10 % best performing goods within a product group is not appropriate for all product groups.
Zato bi bilo pri določanju meril za vsako skupino proizvodov treba natančno raven prizadevanj določiti med 10 in 20 %.
Therefore, the exact ambition level should be set within a range of 10 to 20 % when defining the criteria for each product group.
Merila bi morala temeljiti na vseh vplivih proizvoda na okolje.
The criteria should be based on all the environmental impacts of the product.
Priloga I – del A – točka 2 a (novo)
Annex I – Part A – point 2 a (new)
(2a) Posebna pravila za znak za okolje za prehrambene proizvode in pijačo, kot so opredeljena v členu 2 uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002, ter za hrano, ki spada v področje uredbe (ES) št. 834/2007.
Specific rules for Ecolabel for food and drink products as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 as well as for food falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007.
Tehnično poročilo mora dokazati naslednje:
The technical report should demonstrate the following:
– da se z razvijanjem meril za znak za okolje za določen proizvod dejansko doda okoljska vrednost;
- that there is a real added environmental value in developing Ecolabel criteria for the chosen product;
– da je pri znaku za okolje bil upoštevan celoten življenjski cikel proizvoda;
- that the Ecolabel has taken into account the whole life cycle of the product;
– da uporaba znaka za okolje na določenem proizvodu ne bo povzročala zmede pri potrošnikih, ki ga bodo primerjali z drugimi oznakami na hrani.
- that the use of the Ecolabel on the chosen product will not cause confusion in the minds of consumers when compared with other food labels.
Pri merilih za hrano in pijačo, ki spadajo na področje uporabe uredbe (ES) št. 834/2007, se zato, da se izognemo zmedi pri potrošnikih, lahko spremeni oblika oznake ter informacije na njej
Where criteria are developed for food and drink products falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, the form of the label, and the information it presents, may be modified, in order to avoid any confusion in the minds of consumers.
Priloga I - točka 5
Annex I - point 5
Sestavi se priročnik za uporabo, ki organom za oddajo javnih naročil zagotavlja smernice za uporabo meril znaka za okolje.
A user manual providing guidance for the use of the Ecolabel criteria to authorities awarding public contracts shall be established.
Sestavi se priročnik za uporabo, ki je preveden v vse uradne jezike Skupnosti, ki organom za oddajo javnih naročil zagotavlja smernice za uporabo meril znaka za okolje.
A user manual translated into all official Community languages providing guidance for the use of the Ecolabel criteria to authorities awarding public contracts shall be established.
Opomba: Komisija bo zagotovila predloge priročnikov za uporabo za prosilce in pristojne organe ter priročnikov za uporabo za organe za oddajo javnih naročil.
Note: The Commission will provide templates for the user manual for applicants and competent bodies and for the user manual for authorities awarding public contracts.
Opomba: Komisija bo zagotovila predloge priročnikov za uporabo za prosilce in pristojne organe ter priročnikov za uporabo za organe za oddajo javnih naročil, prevedene v vse uradne jezike Skupnosti .
Note: The Commission will provide templates translated into all official Community languages for the user manual for applicants and competent bodies and for the user manual for authorities awarding public contracts
Prevod priročnika za uporabo in predlogov bo olajšal postopek prijave za podjetja, ki želijo pridobiti znak za okolje.
A translation of the user manual as well as of the templates will facilitate the application procedure that businesses have to undergo in order to obtain the Ecolabel.
Priloga I – točka B a (novo)
Annex I – point B a (new)
(Ba) SKRAJŠAN POSTOPEK ZA NEBISTVEN PREGLED MERIL
Shortened procedure for non - substantial revision of the criteria
Komisija pripravi poročilo, ki vsebuje naslednje:
The Commission shall produce a report containing the following:
- obrazložitev, zakaj popoln pregled meril ni potreben, ampak zadošča preprosta posodobitev meril in njihove strogosti,
- a justification explaining why there is no need for a full revision of the criteria and why a simple updating of the criteria and their stringency levels is sufficient
- tehnični del, ki posodablja prejšnje tržne podatke, uporabljene za določanje meril,
- a technical section updating the previous market data used for the setting of the criteria
- osnutek predloga pregledanih meril,
- a draft revised criteria proposal
- količinsko navedbo splošne okoljske uspešnosti, ki naj bi jo pregledana merila v primerjavi z okoljsko uspešnostjo povprečnih proizvodov na trgu dosegla v celoti,
- a quantitative indication of the overall environmental performance that the revised criteria are expected to achieve in their totality, when compared to that of the average products on the market;
- pregledan priročnik za možne uporabnike znaka za okolje in pristojne organe, ter
- a revised user manual for potential users of the Ecolabel and competent bodies ; and
- pregledan priročnik za organe za oddajo javnih naročil.
- a revised user manual for authorities awarding public contracts.
Poročilo in osnutek predloga meril sta na voljo za javno posvetovanje na spletni strani Komisije, namenjeni znaku za okolje, v dveh mesecih pa je mogoče podati tudi pripombe.
The report and the draft criteria proposal shall be made available for public consultation on the Commission's dedicated Ecolabel website for a period of two months for comment.
Na vse pripombe, prejete med javnim posvetovanjem, bodo podani odgovori, v katerih bo navedeno, ali je bila posamezna pripomba sprejeta ali zavrnjena in zakaj.
Responses shall be given to all comments received during the public consultation period, indicating whether each comment is accepted or rejected and why.
Ob upoštevanju vseh sprememb, vnesenih v obdobju javnega posvetovanja, in če nobena država članica ne zahteva odprtega sestanka delovne skupine, lahko Komisija v skladu s členom 8 sprejme merila.
Subject to any changes made during the public consultation period, and if no Member State requests an open working group meeting, the Commission may adopt the criteria pursuant to A rticle 8.
Na zahtevo katere koli države članice se o osnutku pregledanih meril skliče odprti sestanek delovne skupine, ki se ga udeležijo vse zainteresirane strani, kot so pristojni organi, industrija (vključno z MSP), sindikati, trgovci na drobno, uvozniki ter okoljske in potrošniške organizacije.
Upon request from any Member State , an open working group meeting shall be held on the draft revised criteria, in which all interested parties, such as competent bodies, industry (including SMEs), trade unions, retailers, importers, environmental and consumer organisations, shall participate.
Navedenega sestanka se udeleži tudi Komisija.
The Commission shall also participate in that meeting.
Komisija lahko merila sprejme v skladu s členom 8 in ob upoštevanju vseh sprememb, vnesenih v obdobju javnega posvetovanja ali med sestankom delovne skupine.
Subject to any changes made during the public consultation period or during the working group meeting, the Commission may adopt the criteria pursuant to A rticle 8 .
Obrazložitev: eden najpomembnejših vidikov uspeha znaka za okolje je, da se merila, če ne gre za bistvene spremembe posameznih elementov meril, lahko hitro posodobijo.
Justification: One of the key's elements for the success of Ecolabel would be the fact that criteria can be rapidly updated in case there is a non substantial change of a single element of the criteria.
Priloga II – odstavek 4 a (novo)
Annex II - paragraph 4 a (new)
Besedilo na znaku za okolje določijo pristojni organi vsake države č lanice z uporabo uradnega jezika ali jezikov te države članice tako, da je besedilo enako angleškemu izvirniku.
The lettering on the Ecolabel shall be determined by the competent bodies of each Member State using the official language or languages of that Member State in such a way that the text is equivalent to the English original.
Znak za okolje je ime prostovoljne znamke, katere namen je na evropski ravni spodbujati razširjenost visoko učinkovitih proizvodov z majhnim vplivom na okolje v njihovem celotnem življenjskem krogu.
Ecolabel is the name of a voluntary mark whose purpose is to promote, at European level, the dissemination of high-efficiency products which have a low ecological impact throughout their life-cycle.
Zato so za vsako od številnih kategorij določenih proizvodov že določeni nekateri standardi ekološke kakovosti (lahko se imenujejo „merila“).
To this end, certain eco-quality standards have been fixed (we shall here call them 'criteria') for each of a number of specific product categories.
Znak za okolje je bil doslej podeljen 26 kategorijam proizvodov, 622 licencam in več kot 300 proizvodom in storitvam, kot so detergenti, papir, oblačila (čevlji in tekstilni izdelki), turizem in izdelki za kampiranje.
There are at present 26 product categories, 622 licences and over 3000 products and services - detergents, paper, clothing (including shoes and textiles), tourism, camping products, etc - for which Ecolabels have been awarded.
Ta znamka je z rožo, ki jo simbolizira, poživljajoč element, ki z nenehnim posodabljanjem okoljskih meril za proizvode, katerim se podeljuje, spodbuja podjetja, da so dejavna v okviru plemenitih prizadevanj za splošno povečanje ekološke kakovosti proizvodov na trgu.
This mark and the flower that symbolises it are dynamising elements which, thanks to the constant updating of the environmental criteria for the products for which they are awarded, encourages enterprises to operate a virtuous cycle of effort with a view to the overall raising of the eco-quality of products on the market.
Z Evropskim akcijskim načrtom za proizvodnjo in trajnostno porabo, zlasti pa s pregledom uredbe o znaku za okolje, z uredbo o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo ( KOM(2008)0402 ) in direktivo o okoljsko primerni zasnovi izdelkov( KOM(2008)0399 ) ter z upoštevanjem sporočila o javnih naročilih za boljše okolje (KOM(2008)400) namerava Evropska unija spodbuditi širjenje prostovoljnega integriranega sistema za spodbujanje podjetij k izboljšanju svojih proizvodov in za dosego višjih standardov energetske učinkovitosti in prijaznosti do okolja.
By means of the European action plan for production and sustainable consumption and, in particular, the revision of the Ecolabel regulation, the Emas regulation ( COM(2008)0402 ) and the Eco-design directive ( COM(2008)0399 ), and also taking into account the communication on public contracts for a better environment (COM (2008)408), the Union aims to encourage the spread of a voluntary, integrated system that will encourage enterprises to improve their products and attain higher standards of energy efficiency and environment-friendliness.
Odzivi trga v zvezi z znakom za okolje so si nasprotujoči.
With regard to Ecolabel, the signals emerging from the market are conflicting.
Izkušnje skoraj desetih let, odkar obstaja podeljevanje tega znaka, kažejo, da je treba odločneje ukrepati glede nekaterih bistvenih vidikov sistema.
The experience obtained over the almost ten years of existence of this certification points to the need for more decisive intervention with a view to dealing with certain crucial aspects of the system.
Po eni strani si vse več podjetij iz širokega obsega sektorjev želi pridobiti znak za okolje.
On the one hand, increasing numbers of enterprises are seeking Ecolabel certification, in a very wide range of sectors.
Udeleženci na trgu se zavedajo dodane vrednosti znaka, ki jo ima zaradi neodvisnega dodeljevanja, kar cenijo potrošniki, ki so zdaj bolj dojemljivi za vprašanja socialne odgovornosti podjetij do varovanja okolja.
Operators are aware of the value added conferred by an impartial process of certification which is appreciated by consumers, a group who are now more attuned to the issue of CSI (corporate social responsibility) in the context of environmental protection.
Poleg tega je prednost znaka za okolje tudi v možnosti njegove uporabe na evropski ravni, česar se številna podjetja že zavedajo in si tega pravzaprav želijo.
In addition, the possibility of a European-scale reach for Ecolabel is a further asset, as recognised and indeed desired by numerous enterprises.
Vendar za razliko od drugih evropskih znamk, znaka za okolje mnogi ne poznajo: ni prepoznan njegov pomen in s tem ekološke značilnosti, za katere se zavzema.
Unlike other European marks, it is unknown to many: its significance is not recognised, and, therefore, nor are the ecological characteristics which it exists to promote.
Evropska znamka je manj razširjena in poznana, kar je pravzaprav mogoče ugotoviti že tako, da se jo primerja z nacionalnimi znamkami, ki imajo podobno nalogo.
Indeed, it is sufficient to compare it with the national marks having a similar function to realise that the European mark is less disseminated and less well-known.
Upravljavci v sektorju in nevladne organizacije pa nekoliko kritizirajo zelo dolgotrajno sprejemanje meril (kar lahko traja tudi več kot štiri leta) in neusklajenost sprejetih meril za podobne kategorije proizvodov.
Furthermore, operators in the sector and NGOs tend to be crtical of the excessive time needed for approval of criteria (it can take more than four years), as well as of the lack of harmonisation of the criteria adopted for similar product categories.
Poleg tega znak za okolje ni usklajen s podobnimi znamkami, ki v nekaterih primerih za enake kategorije proizvodov uporabljajo različna merila in so bolje sprejeti kot znak za okolje.
There is, besides, a lack of coordination with the comparable national marks, which in some cases use different parameters for the same types and are more favourably received than Ecolabel.
Komisija je za reševanje teh težav predstavila nov predlog resolucije, ki ga poročevalec v večjem delu podpira.
With a view to tacking these problems, the Commission has presented a proposal for a new regulation.
Predlog uvaja številne spremembe v zvezi s sprejemanjem meril in nov sistem za podeljevanje znaka.
The proposal introduces numerous modifications concerning approval of criteria and a new system for awarding the mark.
Stari sistem, ki zahteva podpis pogodbe med pristojnim organom in upravljavcem se zamenja s sistemom za registracijo.
The old system requiring a contract between the competent body and the operator is replaced by a registration system.
Dodane so določbe za izboljšanje usklajenosti z nacionalnimi sistemi podeljevanja certifikatov.
Provisions are added to improve coordination with the national certification systems.
Za olajšanje pristopa na več ravneh so številni akterji, in sicer Komisija, države članice in upravljavci v sektorju pooblaščeni, da spodbujajo sistem in imajo vodilno vlogo pri oblikovanju in določanju meril.
To facilitate a multi-level approach, a number of agents - the Commission, the Member States, and operators in the sector - are empowered to promote the system and play a leading role in developing and specifying the criteria.
Predlog Komisije uvaja številne nove kategorije proizvodov, vključno s kategorijami proizvodov predelane hrane ter ribištva in ribogojstva.
The Commission proposal introduces a number of new product categories, including processed food products and fisheries and aquaculture products.
Predlog poročevalca:
Rapporteur's proposal
Poročevalec je na predlog vložil številne spremembe, ki temeljijo na treh smernicah:
Your rapporteur has tabled a number of changes to the proposal, on the basis of three guidelines:
- ohraniti zaupanje potrošnikov v visoke standarde ekološke kakovosti, ki jih predstavlja znak za okolje;
- preserving consumer confidence in the high standards of eco-quality represented by Ecolabel;
- povečati razširjenost znaka za okolje s pomočjo ukrepov za povečanje ozaveščenosti potrošnikov in povečanjem števila ustreznih kategorij proizvodov;
- improving the dissemination of Ecolabel through actions to raise consumer awareness and an extension of the number of eligible product categories;
- zagotoviti postopek za potrditev meril, ki bo lahko sledil spreminjanju časa in stopnji inovacij proizvodov na trgu, hkrati pa ohranil okoljsko odličnost in vključil vse upravljavce sektorjev in zainteresirane strani;
- ensuring that the procedure for approving criteria can keep up with changing times and with the level of product innovation on the market, while preserving environmental excellence and involving all sectoral operators and interested parties;
Poročevalec je odpravil omembo proizvodov predelane hrane, ribištva in ribogojstva na podlagi tega, češ da ni priporočljivo različno obravnavati teh kategorij proizvodov, še manj pa uvesti različna pravila za proizvode predelane in nepredelane hrane.
Your rapporteur has eliminated the references to processed food products and fisheries and aquaculture products, on the grounds that it is not advisable to operate differential treatment for those product categories, and still less so to apply different rules to processed and non-processed food products.
Treba je tudi paziti, da ne pride do zamenjave z ekološkimi proizvodi.
It is also important to guard against the risk of confusion with organic products.
Zato se zdi najbolje, da se odločitev, ali se znak za okolje dodeli eni ali drugi vrsti prehrambenih proizvodov, prepusti strokovnjakom: le tisti z ustreznim tehničnim znanjem lahko ocenijo stopnjo prijaznosti do okolja prehrambenih proizvodov v njihovem celotnem življenjskem krogu .
It therefore seems best to leave to the experts any decision on whether to award Ecolabel status to one or other type of food products: only those with the necessary technical knowledge can assess the degree of environment-friendliness of the whole life-cycle of a food product.
V zvezi z novim postopkom je nujno treba pojasniti, da je treba pred registracijo novih proizvodov za pridobitev znaka za okolje preveriti, ali obstajajo resnična merila, t.j. preveriti je treba več kot zgolj dokumentacijo.
Regarding the new procedure, it is essential to make it clear that registration of a new product under Ecolabel must always be preceded by checks on the genuine presence of the criteria, i.e. checks that are more than documentary.
Poročevalec je zato s posebnim predlogom spremembe ponovno uvedel pojem predhodnega pregleda, ki ga je treba opraviti pred podelitvijo znaka za okolje.
Your rapporteur has therefore reintroduced, via a specific amendment, the notion of ex ante controls, to be carried out prior to awarding the Ecolabel mark.