natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sicer tvegamo izvoz industrije izven EU na območja, kjer ni enako visoke zavezanosti dobremu počutju živali.
Otherwise we risk exporting the industry outside of the EU to areas that do not possess the same high commitment to animal welfare.
Namen poročila je tako pojasniti, kdaj so poskusi na živalih sprejemljivi z moralnega in znanstvenega vidika, kako jih je mogoče izvajati in po kakšnih pravilih.
This report therefore seeks to clarify where animal testing is acceptable from a moral and scientific perspective and exactly how and under what rules tests can be carried out.
Cilj ostaja dokončna odprava poskusov na primatih razen človeka, vendar to ni možno, dokler ni mogoče zagotoviti nadaljnjega raziskovanja smrtno nevarnih in izčrpavajočih bolezni s pomočjo alternativnih metod poskusov.
Whilst it remains the goal to ultimately end testing on non human primates this can not happen until we are in a position to ensure that research into life threatening and debilitating diseases can continue through alternative testing methods.
Poleg tega je treba obravnavati vprašanje izmenjave podatkov in podvajanja poskusov na živalih, da bi zmanjšali število poskusov na živalih v Evropski uniji.
In addition, to minimise the amount of animal testing undertaken throughout the EU the issue of data sharing and duplication of animal tests must be addressed.
To je sporno področje, vendar se industrija ne more sklicevati na intelektualno lastnino, medtem ko se poskusi na živalih opravljajo po nepotrebnem.
This is a contentious area however the industry can not hide behind their intellectual property whilst animals needlessly face experiments.
Zato je treba podatke izmenjevati, da bi zmanjšali poskuse na živalih, kjerkoli je možno.
Therefore data should be shared in order to minimise animal testing wherever possible.
To direktivo je treba enotno izvajati v EU.
This directive should be uniformly applied across the EU.
Stališče poročevalca – posamezne točke
Rapporteur's position - specific points
Vključitev fetalnih oblik v drugem členu te direktive je korak predaleč, saj se bo povečala birokracija, počutje živali pa se ne bo bistveno izboljšalo.
The inclusion of foetal forms in this directive through article 2 is a step too far and will increase bureaucracy without significant increases in animal welfare.
Beleženje takih številk bi pomenilo veliko dela, statistika s takim številom uporabljenih živali pa bi bila za te vrste brez pomena.
To record such numbers would entail a vast amount of work and make the statistics on the numbers of animals used meaningless for these species.
Sedanje besedilo člena 6 navaja, da so humane metode ubijanja iz priloge V edine obstoječe, kar ni znanstveno utemeljeno.
The current wording of Article 6 implies that there are no humane methods of killing other than those listed in Annex V, which is scientifically flawed.
Nekateri od sedanjih predlogov v prilogi V bodo zares slabo vplivali na počutje, zlasti ker priloge ni mogoče posodabljati dovolj hitro, da bi sledili znanstvenemu razvoju na tem področju.
Indeed, some of the current proposals in Annex V will have an adverse welfare impact, particularly as the Annex can not be updated quickly enough to keep up to date with scientific developments in this area.
Člen 8 prepoveduje uporabo primatov razen človeka razen v posebnih okoliščinah.
Article 8 bans the use of NHPs except in certain circumstances.
To je treba pojasniti, saj sedanje besedilo očitno prepoveduje vse osnovne raziskave na primatih razen človeka.
This needs to be clarified as the current wording appears to prohibit all basic research on NHPs.
Priporočilo v členu 10, po katerem naj se uporabljajo samo primati razen človeka iz samozadostnih kolonij primatov F2 (druga generacija, vzrejena v ujetništvu), je plemenit cilj, s katerim se bo dolgoročno zagotovilo, da bo iz divjine odvzetih manj živali.
The recommendation in Article 10 only to source non-human primates from self sustaining colonies of F2 primates (the second generation bred in captivity) is a noble aim and one which in the long term will ensure that fewer animals are taken from the wild.
Vendar predlog ni praktično izvedljiv po časovnem razporedu, ki ga predvideva Komisija.
However, the proposal is not practical within the timescale that the Commission has envisioned.
Nikjer na svetu še niso bile uspešno oblikovane samozadostne kolonije F2 in obstaja možnost, da bo za razvoj trajnostnih kolonij F2 potrebna evtanazija veliko samcev primatov iz kategorije F1.
Self sustaining F2 colonies have not been successfully established anywhere in the world and there is the possibility that many male primates in the F1 category will need to be euthanized in order to allow for the development of sustainable F2 colonies.
Zato je treba izvesti študijo o izvedljivosti, preden bo prehod na izključno uporabo samozadostnih kolonij F2 obvezen.
A feasibility study should therefore be conducted ahead of any mandated move towards establishing a policy of only sourcing from F2 self sustaining colonies.
V poročilu Komisije je zevajoča pomanjkljivost, da razvrstitev glede na težo posledic ni opredeljena.
A glaring omission in the Commission report is the lack of definition of severity classifications.
Komisija navede nekatere izraze za težo posledic, „do vključno blagi“, „zmerni“ in „hudi“, ki določajo, kako se lahko poskusi izvajajo, vendar pa ne opredeli oznak samih.
The Commission identifies a number of severity clauses, "up to mild" "moderate" and "severe" governing how experiments can be undertaken, however it does not define what the classifications are.
To je treba pojasniti.
This must be clarified.
Najbolj jasna obstoječa razvrstitev je očitno švicarski sistem razvrstitve, ki je zato tudi predlagan.
The Swiss system of classifications appears to be the clearest of existing classifications and is therefore proposed.
Prepoved dolgotrajnih hudih postopkov v členu 15 lahko pomeni, da je mogoče prekiniti projekte o revmatoidnem artritisu ali kronični bolečini, povezani z rakom, ali o drugih nevroloških boleznih.
The ban on prolonged, severe procedures in Article 15 could mean that projects on rheumatoid arthritis or chronic pain related to cancers and other neurological diseases could be stopped.
Načelo o omejitvi vnovične uporabe živali v poskusih je sicer pozitivno, vendar lahko člen 16 v predlogu Komisije povzroči, da se bo pri poskusih uporabljalo še več živali.
While the principle of restricting the re-use of animals in experiments is positive, the Commission proposal in Article 16 may lead to many more animals being used in experiments.
To zlasti velja, če ni mogoče ponovno uporabiti živali, ki je prestala postopek z oznako „do vključno blag“.
This is particularly the case if re-use is not possible on an animal that has undergone a procedure which was categorised as "up to mild."
Nekateri postopki obsegajo tudi trening ali pripravo živali, čemur sledi dejanski poskus.
Some procedures involve the training or preparation of an animal followed by the actual experiment.
Na primer, morda je treba navaditi primata, da na zaslonu na dotik izbere posamezne podobe, da se lahko preuči možganske procese.
For example, a primate might have to be trained to use a touch-screen to select particular images, so that brain processes can be studied.
Tako učenje se lahko začne že eno leto pred poskusom.
Such training can take up to a year ahead of the experiment.
V drugih primerih postopek lahko vključuje anestezijo, kirurški poseg in okrevanje (na primer vsaditev radijskega monitorja za krvni pritisk).
In other cases the preparation might involve anaesthesia, a surgical operation and recovery (eg to implant a radio monitor for blood pressure).
Veliko teh pripravljalnih postopkov ima oznako „zmerni“.
Many of these preparatory procedures are classed as "moderate".
Z vnovično uporabo tako pripravljenih živali v drugih postopkih bi lahko raziskave opravili hitreje in učinkoviteje ter pogosto dobili boljše podatke.
Re-using such a prepared animal in further procedures allows research to be done faster, more efficiently and often generates better data.
Vendar se ne sme ponovno uporabiti živali, ki je prestala „hud“ postopek.
However, an animal that has undergone a "severe" procedure should not be re-used.
Nasprotno pa je treba dovoliti, da se živali, ki so prestale „zmeren“ postopek, ponovno uporabijo v drugem „zmernem“ postopku.
In contrast those previously subjected to a "moderate" procedure should be permitted to undergo a further "moderate" procedure.
Glede na sedaj predlagano besedilo bi se v farmakokinetičnih študijah, pri katerih se preverja učinek nove sestavine, število psov povečalo za dvajsetkrat.
In pharmacokinetic studies which consist on checking the effect of a new compound, the number of dogs would increase 20 times under the current proposed wording.
Medsebojno priznavanje poklicne usposobljenosti v členu 20 je zelo pomembno za podpiranje prostega pretoka dobro usposobljenih laboratorijskih znanstvenikov.
In article 20, the mutual recognition of professional qualifications is very important to support the free movement of well qualified lab scientists.
S tem se bodo tudi povečale možnosti za izvajanje skupnih projektov med državami članicami.
It will also enhance the opportunities for collaborative projects to be run across member states.
V členu 26 bi bilo treba izvesti letni pregled vseh projektov z oznako „hudi“, za ostale projekte pa bi bil primeren pregled vsaka tri leta.
In article 26, it would be appropriate to do an annual review for all projects rated as "severe," but for other projects a review every three years would be appropriate.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba odločitev o naknadni oceni postopkov, ki nimajo oznake „hudi“, in postopkov z uporabo primatov razen človeka prepustiti etični presoji.
In addition, the decision for retrospective review for procedures other than severe of for Non-human primates should be left with the ethical review.
Glede na svetovno pomanjkanje pri dobavi primatov razen človeka Evropska unija nima ekonomske moči, da bi podprla predlog v členu 27 in z njim zagotovila, da imajo dobavitelji primatov razen človeka izven EU vzpostavljeno strategijo, s katero bi povečali delež živali, ki so potomci primatov razen človeka, vzrejeni v ujetništvu.
Given the shortage of the world supply of NHPs, the EU has no economic weight to support the proposal in Article 27 to ensure that non EU suppliers of NHPs have a strategy in place to increase the proportion of animals that are the offspring of non-human primates that have been bred in captivity.
Zahteva v členu 35 za predhodno odobritev vseh projektov, vključno s humanim ubijanjem in uporabo nevretenčarjev, bi resno ovirala raziskave in bistveno zmanjšala konkurenčnost EU.
In article 35, requiring prior authorisation for all projects, including humane killing and the use of invertebrates would severely hamper research and put the EU at a significant competitive disadvantage.
Standardi za oskrbo in namestitev iz člena 32 bi morali biti zgolj smernice, kot je določeno v Prilogi A evropske konvencije Sveta Evrope (ETS 123).
The care and accommodation standards referred to in Article 32 should only be guidelines as it is in the Annex A of the European Convention of the Council of Europe (ETS 123).
Je pa zaskrbljujoče, da je priloga, ki jo predlaga Komisija, le skrajšana različica besedila Sveta Evrope.
However it is a concern that the annex proposed by the Commission is only an abridged version of the CoE text ?
Za lažji razvoj alternativnih metod poskusov je treba področje dela Evropskega centra za validacijo alternativnih metod razširiti na usklajevanje in spodbujanje alternativ poskusom na živalih.
In order to facilitate the development of alternative testing methods, the scope of the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) should be extended to include the co-ordination and promotion of alternatives to animal procedures.
Več pozornosti je treba nameniti razvoju in spodbujanju alternativnih metod.
A greater focus should be placed on both the development of and the promotion of alternative methods.
Zagotavljanje spodbujanja in podpore alternativnih metod na ravni EU je bistvenega pomena za zmanjšanje in končno odpravo poskusov na živalih.
The key to reducing and eventually eliminating experiments on animals is by ensuring that alternative methods are encouraged and supported at an EU level.
Vsaka država članica mora določiti nacionalne referenčne laboratorije, da bi zagotovili usklajevanje, podporo in spodbujanje raziskav na tem področju na ravni EU, s tem pa bi spodbudili boljšo izmenjavo in usklajevanje alternativnih metod.
Each member state should designate national reference labs to ensure that research into this area is co-ordinated, supported and encouraged at EU level in order to foster better sharing and co-ordination of alternative methods.
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu živali, ki se uporabljajo za znanstvene namene
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes
Ne samo novo znanje o etoloških vidikih nastanitve laboratorijskih živali, temveč tudi novi načini uporabe živali, zlasti na področju genskega inženiringa, zahtevajo nujno spremembo Direktive 86/609/EGS, čeprav je pomenila zgodovinski dosežek in od takrat je bil dosežen velik napredek, zlasti kar zadeva vpeljavo načela nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja.
Not just new knowledge on ethological aspects of housing laboratory animals, but also new applications of animal use, in particular in the area of genetic engineering, made the revision of the Directive 86/609/EEC an urgent matter, although it was at that time a historic achievement and good progress has been made since then, particularly with regard to the introduction of 3Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement) principles.
V imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varstvo hrane pozdravljam predlog Komisije o ponovnem pregledu te direktive.
On behalf of the ENVI Committee, I very much welcome the Commission's proposal to revise the Directive.
Vsebuje koristne ukrepe, ki bodo izboljšali dobro počutje živali, hkrati pa uvajali strožje predpise v skladu z mednarodno sprejetimi načeli humanih poskusnih tehnik in dobre znanosti.
It contains valuable measures that will improve animal welfare, while introducing more stringent regulations along the lines of the internationally accepted principles of humane experimental techniques and good science.
Obravnava veliko pomislekov v zvezi z varstvom živali, uporabljenih za poskusne in znanstvene namene.
It covers many concerns regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and scientific purposes.
Vendar pa obstajajo področja, na katerih predlog Komisije potrebuje okrepitev.
There are, however, areas where the Commission's proposal needs strengthening.
Z vidika dobrega počutja živali pozdravljam razširitev področja uporabe direktive, da se vključi zarodke živali, ki lahko čutijo, in nevretenčarje ter osnovne biološke raziskave.
From an animal welfare angle, I welcome the extension of the scope of the Directive to include sentient foetal animals and invertebrate species as well as basic biological research.
V okviru te direktive prav tako pozdravljam vključitev humanih metod ubijanja.
I also welcome the introduction of humane methods of killing in the context of the Directive.
Uporabo primatov je treba opustiti in nemudoma prepovedati uporabo velikih opic in primatov, ujetih v divjini.
The use of non-human hominids should be phased out with an immediate ban on the use of great apes and wild-caught primates.
Opuščanje uporabe primatov „F1“, kar pomeni prenehanje uporabe mladičev primatov, ujetih v divjini, je najbolj pomembno z etičnega vidika in vidika dobrega počutja živali ter ohranjanja vrst.
The phasing out of the use of "F1" primates, meaning the end of the use of the offspring of primates caught in the wild is of outmost importance both from an ethical and an animal welfare and conservation point of view.
Ukrep bi zmanjšal pritisk na prosto živeče populacije in preprečil mučenja, povezana s trgovino s prosto živečimi primati.
The measure would reduce pressure on wild populations and prevent the cruelty associated with the trade in wild primates.
V nasprotju s predlogom Komisije smo prepričani, da bi izjeme od tega pravila omogočile laboratorijske poskuse na teh zelo ogroženih vrstah.
In contrast to the Commission's proposal, we believe that exemptions to the rule would leave the door open to laboratory experimentation on these highly endangered species.
Zato je treba črtati tako imenovano zaščitno klavzulo v zvezi z velikimi opicami (člen 50).
The so-called "safeguard clause" in regard of Great Apes (Article 50) should be therefore deleted.
Ukrep je v skladu z obveznostmi, prvotno izraženimi v Direktivi 86/609 izpred dvajsetih let.
This move is in line with the commitments originally expressed in Directive 86/609, over twenty years ago.
Prepovedi ali delne prepovedi za uporabe velikih opic in primatov, ujetih v divjini, v postopkih so že v veljavi v več državah članicah, uporaba velikih opic pa se na ozemlju EU ne izvaja več.
Prohibitions or partial prohibitions on the use of Great Apes and wild-caught primates in procedures are already in place in several Member States, and Great Apes use is no more in practice in the EU territory.
Zato je možno hitro usklajevanje v vsej Evropi.
Rapid harmonization throughout Europe is therefore possible.
Obvezna uporaba sprejemljivih in praktično dostopnih metod nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja v členu 13 je bistven napredek v primerjavi z manj strogo ureditvijo v Direktivi 86/609.
Mandatory use of reasonably and practically available '3Rs' methods in Article 13 is a substantial step forward, compared with less stringent regulation in the Directive 86/609.
Prav tako je pomembna vzpostavitev zgornje meje bolečine in trpljenja, ki bi veljala v vsej EU (člen 15).
Essential is also the establishment of an EU-wide upper limit of permissible pain and suffering (Article 15).
Postopkov, ki povzročajo hudo trpljenje živali, se ne sme odobriti.
Procedures causing severe suffering of animals should not be permitted.
Vendar pa je neobstoj meril za razvrstitev postopkov zaskrbljujoč, saj je veliko ukrepov iz predloga odvisnih od razvrstitve glede na težo posledic.
However, the absence of criteria for classification of procedures is of concern as many measures contained in the proposal depend on severity classifications.
Predlagamo možno rešitev, in sicer uvedbo dodatne priloge za okvirne opredelitve teže posledic.
We are proposing a possible solution to this, adding an extra annex to give provisional definitions on severity grades.
Ob upoštevanju metod, uporabljenih v postopkih, je treba izboljšati toksikološke raziskave, katerih končni rezultat je smrt (na tem področju je bil dosežen majhen napredek), da se prepreči tako hudo trpljenje živali, da je smrt že neizbežna.
In regard of methods used in procedures, toxicological studies requiring death as an end-point should be refined (some progress has been achieved in this area) to prevent animals suffering beyond the time at which death is inevitable.
Beleženje, poročanje in analiziranje ravni trpljenja za namene poskusov mora postati obvezno, da se sporoči etično presojo in postopke odobritve.
Recording, reporting and analyzing the levels of suffering due to experiments should be mandatory in order to inform the ethical review and authorization process.
Načela etične presoje in odobritve (poglavje IV) so med glavnimi značilnostmi.
The principles of ethical review and authorization (Chapter IV) are among central features.
Etične presoje, ki jih že uporablja 21 držav članic, morajo biti sestavni del postopka odobritve, katerega cilj je primerjati etično vprašljive uporabe živali v znanstvene namene.
Ethical reviews which are already used in 21 Member States need to be an integral part of the authorization process aiming at comparing the use of animals in scientific research with ethical concerns.
Ocena škode in koristi, pretehtati uporabe živali s pričakovanimi koristmi za človekovo zdravje ali zdravstvene raziskave ali regulativne potrebe, je pomemben sestavni del.
Harm/benefit assessment, balancing the use of animals with the expected benefits for human health or medical research or regulatory need, is an important part of it.
Nadalje bo naknadna ocena spodbujala dobro znanost, dobro počutje živali ter uporabo načela nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja.
Further on, the retrospective assessment will encourage good science as well as animal welfare and the '3Rs'.
Pozdravljam nacionalne preglede (člen 33), ki zagotavljajo vsaj en nenapovedan pregled na leto.
I welcome national inspections (Article 33), which stipulate at least one unannounced inspection per year.
Prav tako menim, da je treba vzpostaviti inšpektorat EU za izvajanje nenapovedanih pregledov enot, da se v državah članicah zagotovi enotna in pravilna uporaba razvrstitev glede na težo posledic.
I also believe that an EU inspectorate should be established to perform unannounced inspections of establishments in order to ensure that severity classifications are applied uniformly and correctly in the Member States.
Treba je objaviti poročila in ugotovitve (zlasti kršitve te direktive) EU in nacionalnih pregledov.
Reports and findings (particularly breaches of this Directive) of EU and national inspections should be published.
Prav tako je dobrodošla povečana preglednost, kot je predlagana v členu 40, pri čemer se upošteva potreba po varovanju zaupnih informacij in obveznosti Komisije in držav članic, da prispevajo k razvoju alternativnih pristopov k metodam, uporabljenim na živalih (člen 45).
Increased transparency, as proposed in Article 40 is welcomed too, taking into account the need for safeguarding confidential information, as well as an obligation of the Commission and Member States to contribute to the development of alternatives to animal methods (Article 45).
Enako velja tudi za ustanovitev nacionalnih laboratorijev za pomoč pri potrjevanju alternativnih metod.
This goes also for the establishment of national laboratories to assist the validation of alternative methods.
(7) V tej direktivi bi morale biti zajete tudi embrionalne in fetalne oblike vretenčarjev, saj obstajajo znanstveni dokazi, da je pri teh oblikah v zadnji tretjini njihovega razvoja povečana nevarnost čutenja bolečine, trpljenja in stiske, kar lahko tudi negativno vpliva na njihov nadaljnji razvoj.
(7) This Directive should also cover embryonic and foetal forms of vertebrate animals, as there is scientific evidence showing that such forms in the last third of their development have an increased risk of experiencing pain, suffering and distress, which may also affect negatively their subsequent development.
(7) V tej direktivi bi morale biti zajete tudi embrionalne in fetalne oblike vretenčarjev, za katere se predvidi rojstvo, vendar le, če je znanstveno dokazano, da je živčni sistem sposoben integrirati bolečinske signale, saj obstajajo znanstveni dokazi, da je pri teh oblikah v zadnji tretjini njihovega razvoja povečana nevarnost čutenja bolečine, trpljenja in stiske, kar lahko tudi negativno vpliva na njihov nadaljnji razvoj.
(7) This Directive should also cover, only when it is scientifically proven that the nervous system is able to integrate pain signals, embryonic and foetal forms of vertebrate animals for which a birth is envisaged , as there is scientific evidence showing that such forms in the last third of their development have an increased risk of experiencing pain, suffering and distress, which may also affect negatively their subsequent development.