natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
129. računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo je Evropsko računsko sodišče pripravilo v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
129. as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0000. in svoje resolucije z ugotovitvami, ki je sestavni del sklepa,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0000. and to its resolution with observations that forms an integral part of that Decision,
– ob upoštevanju posebnih poročil Evropskega računskega sodišča, pripravljenih v skladu s členom 287(4), drugi pododstavek Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to the special reports of the Court of Auditors drawn up pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,–
– ob upoštevanju priporočil Sveta z dne 15. februarja 2011 o podelitvi razrešnice Komisiji glede izvrševanja proračuna za proračunsko leto 2009 (05891/2011 – C7–0053/2011 ),
– having regard to the Council's recommendation of 15 February 2011 on the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2009 (05891/2011 – C7‑0053/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 17(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, členov 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanje Evropske unije ter členov 179a in 180b Pogodbe Euratom,
– having regard to Article 17(1) of the Treaty on European Union, Articles 317, 318 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 179a and 180b of the Euratom Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 76 in Priloge VI svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 76 of and Annex VI to its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenj drugih zadevnih odborov ( A7-0135/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the other committees concerned ( A7-0135/2011 ),
A. ker Komisija v skladu s členom 17(1) Pogodbe o EU izvršuje proračun in upravlja programe, v skladu s členom 317 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pa to počne na lastno odgovornost, pri čemer sodeluje z državami članicami in upošteva načelo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja,
A. whereas, under Article 17(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the Commission shall execute the budget and manage programmes and shall do so, under Article 317 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in cooperation with the Member States on its own responsibility, having regard to the principle of sound financial management,
B. ker posebna poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča vsebujejo podatke, ki se nanašajo na vprašanja izvrševanja sredstev, ki so zato Parlamentu koristna pri opravljanju njegovih nalog organa za podelitev razrešnice,
B. whereas the special reports of the Court of Auditors provide information on issues of concern related to the implementation of funds, which are thus useful for Parliament in exercising its role of discharge authority,
C. ker so ugotovitve posebnih poročil Evropskega računskega sodišča sestavni del njegove resolucije
C. whereas its conclusions on the special reports of the Court of Auditors form an integral part of its resolution
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0000 (resolucija o razrešnici Komisiji). z ugotovitvami, ki je priložena sklepu o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek III – Komisija,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0000 (Commission discharge resolution). with observations accompanying its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009, Section III – Commission,
Splošne pripombe
General Remarks
Del I – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 15/2009 „Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij Združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje”
Part I - Special Report No 15/2009 of the Court of Auditors entitled "EU assistance implemented through United Nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring"
6. izraža zaskrbljenost, ker je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da prihaja do težav pri prenosu strogih pravnih zahtev za objektivno in pregledno izbiro partnerjev v praktična merila, ki so namenjena podpori pri sprejemanju odločitev;
Is concerned by the Court of Auditors' finding that there are difficulties translating the strict legal requirements for the objective and transparent selection of partners into practical criteria for the purpose of supporting decision making;
9. meni, da bi moral predlog Komisije o skladih več donatorjev združevati njene zmogljivosti, da ustvari, upravlja in usklajuje te sklade, z zadostnim demokratičnim in proračunskim nadzorom;
Takes the view that the Commission's proposal on multi-donor trust funds should combine the Commission's capacities to create, manage and coordinate such funds with sufficient democratic and budgetary scrutiny;
12. meni, da bi bilo treba Parlamentu zagotoviti dokazila o zanesljivosti mednarodnih organizacij v obliki izjav o zanesljivosti, podobne tistim, ki jih morajo izdati odgovorni odredbodajalci Komisije na podlagi prenosa, ter nacionalnim izjavam o upravljanju, ki jih Parlament zahteva od držav članic;
Believes that Parliament should be provided with assurance evidence in the form of a statement of assurance from the international organisation similar to the statement that Commission's competent authorising officers by delegation are required to issue and similar to the national management declarations which Parliament requests from the Member States;
15. opozarja Računsko sodišče in Komisijo, da je v skladu s členom 8 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije spodbujanje enakosti med moškimi in ženskami temeljno načelo Evropske unije pri vseh njenih dejavnostih; zato je treba vidike enakosti spola upoštevati v vseh fazah proračunskega postopka, ki vključuje pripravo, izvrševanje in revizijo proračuna Evropske unije;
Reminds the Court of Auditors and the Commission that, under Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the promotion of equality between men and women is a fundamental principle of the European Union in all its activities; therefore, gender aspects must be taken into consideration at all steps of the budgetary procedure including the preparation, implementation and auditing of the budget of the European Union;
18. ugotavlja, da dejavnosti usposabljanja v revidiranih programih niso bile vzpostavljene kot neposreden odziv na analize zahtev na trgu dela, vzpostavljeni ukrepi pa so pogosto puščali veliko prostora za izvajanje ukrepov, namesto da bili zadostno usmerjeni na posebne ciljne skupine; obžaluje, da Evropsko računsko sodišče ni upoštevali širša vprašanja v zvezi z vračanjem žensk na delo ali izboljševanjem njihovih veščin in sposobnosti;
Notes that the training actions contained within the programmes that were audited were not established as a direct response to the analyses of labour market requirements and the measures established tended to leave a broad choice on how actions were to be implemented, failing to focus sufficiently on specific target groups; regrets that the Court of Auditors did not take into account the wider issues surrounding getting women back into work, or improving their skills;
20. ugotavlja, da merila za izbiro projektov v revidiranih državah članicah pri uporabi sedanjih indikatorjev niso zadostno upoštevala analiz trga dela ali zagotovila, da bi bili izbrani projekti skladni z glavnimi programskimi cilji; priporoča, naj se v prihodnje kazalnike bolj osredotoči na enakost spolov ter se določi jasne cilje in izboljša zanesljivost podatkov za zagotovitev, da bodo organi izvajanja, države članice in Komisija lahko učinkovito izvajali ocene;
Notes that, in using current indicators, project selection criteria in the Member States audited did not take sufficient account of analyses of the labour market nor ensure that the projects that were selected were in line with overall programme objectives; recommends that, in future, indicators be more focussed on gender equality, that clear targets be established and that reliability of information be improved to ensure that evaluations can be carried out effectively by the implementing authorities, the Member States and the Commission;
25. ponavlja svojo zahtevo Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču, da mora poročilo o razrešnici za proračun vsebovati podatke o politikah vključevanja enakosti spolov in podatke glede na spol.
Reiterates its demand to the Commission and the Court of Auditors that the information on gender mainstreaming policies and gender-specific data be included in the budget discharge report.
26. pozdravlja objavo poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča in temeljito analizo, ko jo je opravilo;
Welcomes the publication of the report by the Court of Auditors and the thorough analysis carried out by the Court;
28. pozdravlja izboljšani ureditveni okvir za poenostavljene postopke za uvoz, ki je bil uveden v začetku leta 2009 in pričakuje, da bo Komisija brez dodatnega odlašanja in najkasneje do konca leta 2011 končala svoje smernice za naknadne revizije;
Welcomes the improved regulatory framework for simplified procedures for imports, introduced from the beginning of 2009 and expects the Commission to complete its guidelines for ex-post audits without any further delay and at the latest by the end of 2011;
31. meni, da morajo države članice narediti več za zagotavljanje učinkovitega zbiranja carinskih dajatev, zlasti glede na to, da zadržijo 25 % teh dajatev kot nadomestilo za stroške zbiranja;
Is of the opinion that the Member States should put more effort into ensuring the effective collection of customs duties, particularly given that they retain 25 % of those duties by way of compensation for the costs of collecting them;
35. poziva Komisijo, naj do februarja 2011 prouči primer Belgije, Francije, Irski, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva, kjer trgovci niso mogli zagotoviti zahtevane carinske dokumentacije za naknadno revizijo, Parlament pa obvesti o ukrepih, ki so jih sprejele te države članice za popravo stanja pred koncem postopka razrešnice za leto 2009;
Calls on the Commission to examine by February 2011 the cases of Belgium, France, Ireland, Sweden and United Kingdom, where traders were unable to provide the requested customs documentation in the framework of ex-post audits, and to inform Parliament of actions taken by those Member States in order to remedy the situation before the end of the discharge procedure for 2009;
Del IV – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 2/2010 z naslovom „Uspešnost podpornih shem za načrtovalne študije in izgradnjo novih infrastruktur v okviru šestega okvirnega programa za raziskave“
Part IV - Special Report No 2/2010 of the Court of Auditors entitled "The effectiveness of the Design Studies and Construction of New Infrastructures support schemes under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research"
39. poudarja, da mora Komisija previdno proučiti vse prvine, da zagotovi najboljši izkoristek sredstev; vendar ugotavlja, da niti v tem posebnem poročilu niti v odgovoru Komisije ni jasnih dokazov, ki bi navajali k ugotovitvi, da je Komisija sredstva res najbolje izkoristila;
Emphasises that the Commission should carefully consider all elements in order to get the best value for money; notes, however, that there is no explicit evidence provided by this special report or in the reply of the Commission which could lead to the conclusion that the Commission did indeed get the best value for money;
Posebno poročilo št. 2/2010, odgovor Komisije na točki 25 in 25: „Cilj sheme izgradnje novih infrastruktur je bil optimizacija evropskih infrastruktur z zagotavljanjem omejene podpore za razvoj omejenega števila projektov za nove infrastrukture v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih, kjer ima lahko takšna podpora kritičen usmerjevalni učinek v smislu evropske dodane vrednosti“. nezadostna, še zlasti opredelitev načina njunega merjenja in kako uporaba sredstev, porabljenih na teh projektih, ustreza tema dvema izrazoma; zato poziva Komisijo, naj te izraze dodatno pojasni na določen in izmerljiv način;
Special Report No 2/2010, reply of the Commission on points 25-26: "The objective of the CNI scheme was to optimise European infrastructures by providing limited support for the development of a restricted number of projects for new infrastructures in duly justified cases where such support could have a critical catalysing effect in terms of European added value". and specifically how these are measured and in which way the funds spent for these projects correspond to the terms "European dimension" and "European added value"; calls, accordingly, on the Commission to clarify these terms further, in a specific and measurable manner;
46. opozarja, da je Komisija leta 2008 objavila priročnik o financiranju EU za raziskovanje in inovacije, države članice pa pozvala, naj zaradi usklajene uporabe sredstev izboljšajo ureditve;
Recalls that the Commission published, in 2008, a Practical Guide to EU funding opportunities for Research and Innovation and invited the Member States to improve the arrangements for a coordinated use of funding;
Del V – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 3/2010 z naslovom „Ocene učinka v institucijah EU: ali pomagajo pri odločanju?“
Part V - Special Report No 3/2010 of the Court of Auditors entitled "Impact Assessments in the EU institutions: do they support decision - making?"
50. z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da so v skladu z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča postopki ocenjevanja učinka postali sestavni del postopka razvoja politike in so prispevali k izboljšanju zakonodajnih postopkov Komisije;
Notes with satisfaction that, according to the Court of Auditors’ findings, the IA procedures have become an integral part of the policy development process and have contributed towards improving the Commission’s legislative proposals;
52. spodbuja Komisijo, naj uvede ukrepe za izboljšanje preglednosti postopka načrtovanja ocen učinka; meni, da bi morala Komisija pojasniti razloge za potrebo po oceni učinka ter objaviti razloge za morebitne odločitve, da ne bo izvedla ocene učinka (zlasti v primerih, ko je odbor za oceno učinka opredelil potrebo po izvedbi ocene učinka);
Encourages the Commission to establish measures aimed at enhancing the transparency of the IA planning process; believes that the Commission should not only explain the reasons why an IA is needed, but also make public the reasons behind any decisions not to carry out an IA (in particular in cases when its IAB has identified the need to carry out an IA);
56. meni, da mora biti predložitev ocene učinka in razprava o njej sestavni del zakonodajnega dela Parlamenta, ter poziva svoje odbore, naj predstavnike Komisije pogosteje vabijo k sodelovanju;
Is of the opinion that presenting and discussing the IAs should be an integral part of Parliament’s legislative work and encourages its committees to invite the Commission’s representatives to participate in this more often;
Komisijo opozarja na kritične pripombe o predolgi in tehnični naravi ocen učinkov ter o zapletenosti besedil; meni, da bi izboljšave na teh področjih povečale uporabnost ocen učinkov za zakonodajalce, zainteresirane strani in javnost;
Draws the Commission's attention to the critical comments on the lengthy and technical nature of the IAs, as well as on the complexity of language used; believes that improvement in those areas would enhance the usefulness of the IAs for legislators, stakeholders and the public;
63. poudarja, da pravica Komisije do pobude omejuje vlogo Parlamenta in trdno verjame, da bi neodvisne, svobodne in neomejene ocene učinkov in vrednotenja poslancem Evropskega parlamenta dale večjo besedo o prihodnjem razvoju evropskih politik;
Underlines that the Commission's right of initiative limits Parliament's role and believes strongly that independent, free and unrestricted IAs and evaluations would give Members of the European Parliament a bigger say on future developments of European policies;
Del VI – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 4/2010 z naslovom „Ali je od zasnove in upravljanja programa mobilnosti v okviru programa Leonardo da Vinci mogoče pričakovati dobre rezultate?“
Part VI - Special Report No 4/2010 of the Court of Auditors entitled “Is the d esign and m anagement of the m obility s cheme of the Leonardo da Vinci Programme l ikely to l ead to e ffective r esults?”
68. poziva Komisijo, naj z nadaljnjim razvojem priročnika o ocenjevanju za ocenjevalce zagotovi ustrezno ocenjevanje prijav ter v svoje obiske za nadzor kakovosti in učinka v sodelujočih državah vključi ocenjevalne preglede prijav, če bi analiza takšnih pregledov pokazala, da omogočajo dodano vrednost;
Calls on the Commission to ensure correct assessment of applications by further developing the assessment handbook for evaluators and by integrating, into its quality and impact monitoring visits to participating countries assessment checks of applications, should the analysis of the added value of such checks prove positive;
Del VII – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 5/2010 z naslovom „Izvajanje pristopa iz pobude Leader za razvoj podeželja“
Part VII - Special Report No 5/2010 of the Court of Auditors entitled "Implementation of the Leader approach for rural development"
72. podpira priporočila 3, 4, 5 in 6 Računskega sodišča;
Supports recommendations 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Court of Auditors;
76. meni, da bi morala Komisija za dodano vrednost pobude Leader še bolj spodbujati lokalne akcijske skupine, naj aktivno iščejo lokalne akterje, ki so zmožni razviti več strateških projektov v okolici, kot se trenutno dogaja v nemški deželi Mecklenburg-Pomorjansko in na Irskem;
Believes that, to ensure the "value-added" element of Leader, the Commission should further encourage LAGs to undertake outreach work to identify local actors that are able to develop more strategic projects in areas, such as currently happens in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) and Ireland;
78. ugotavlja, da je bila reforma trga sladkorja v Uniji leta 2006 na splošno uspešna in je dosegla večjo konkurenčnost ter premostila razliko v ceni na notranjem trgu Unije in svetovnem trgu;
Notes that, in general terms, the 2006 reform of the Union sugar market was successful and achieved the objectives of increasing competitiveness and bridging the price gap between the internal Union and world market;
80. se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da bi bili podatki o proizvodnji in uspešnosti pridelovalcev sladkorja zelo koristni pri oceni izvajanja reforme; v skladu s tem poročevalec sprašuje Komisijo, zakaj teh podatkov ni zahtevala kot pogoj za prejemanje finančne pomoči;
Agrees with the Court of Auditors that data on the productivity and efficiency of sugar producers could be very useful for the purpose of assessing the implementation of the reform; accordingly, the rapporteur asks the Commission why it did not require such data as a prerequisite for receiving financial assistance;
83. kar zadeva dodatno kvoto za izoglukozo, poudarja, da njena industrijska proizvodnja ni povezana z lokalno razpoložljivostjo koruze in drugih surovin, cena koruze in drugih surovin za proizvodnjo izoglukoze pa, kot omenja Komisija, ostaja nespremenjena; posledično ugotavlja, da so povpraševanje po izoglukozi in vzorci njene porabe bistveno drugačni kot pri sladkorju; zato se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da „logika vključevanja teh dodatnih brezplačnih kvot v poznejše odpovedi kvotam nikakor ni jasna“
Emphasises, as far as the additional isoglucose quota is concerned, that its industrial production is not connected with the local availability of maize and other raw materials and that, as the Commission mentions, the price of maize and other raw materials used for processing isoglucose remains unaffected; notes, accordingly, that the demand and the pattern of isoglucose consumption are fundamentally different from sugar consumption; agrees, as a result, with the Court of Auditors that "the logic of including those additional quotas free of charge in the subsequent quota reductions is far from clear"
Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, točka 43. , in sprašuje Komisijo, kateremu javnemu dobru se je služilo v primeru brezplačnih pravic, ki so jih dobili proizvajalci izoglukoze;
Special Report No 6/2010, point 43. and asks the Commission what public good was served in the case of the free allowances which were given to isoglucose producers;
Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, točka 72. , in se sprašuje, ali bi bila reforma lahko zasnovana tako, da bi kar najbolj zmanjšala te razlike;
Special Report No 6/2010, point 72. and wonders whether the reform could have been designed in a way which could have minimised these variations;
Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, točka 73. , in meni, da bi bili ti podatki zelo koristni za splošno predstavo o reformi v zadevnih regijah; v skladu s tem ugotavlja, da pri pretoku sredstev iz Unije k upravičencem lahko pričakujemo (na osnovi pravice evropskih davkoplačevalcev, da so seznanjeni s tem) povratni tok preglednih informacij o načinih porabe teh sredstev, kar v nobenem pogledu ni v nasprotju s pristojnostmi držav članic;
Special Report No 6/2010, point 73. and considers these data very useful in order to have an overall picture of the reform on the regions concerned; notes, accordingly, that when funds from the Union flow towards a beneficiary, a reverse flow of transparent information on the way these funds were used, which is in no way contradictory to the Member States' competencies, can be expected, based on the European taxpayer's right to know;
89. se strinja z Evropskim računskim sodiščem, da bi morala Komisija predlagati vrsto ukrepov za „odstranitev togosti in omejitev v sedanjem sistemu kvot, ki negativno vplivajo na konkurenčnost pridelovalcev in proizvajalcev“
Agrees with the Court of Auditors that the Commission should propose a series of measures "to remove the rigidities and constraints in the current quota system which affect adversely the competitiveness of growers and producers"
Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, priporočilo 2. ;
Special Report No 6/2010, recommendation 2. ;
Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, odgovor Komisije, točka 58. , če se pri tem upošteva odprtje trga Unije za tretje države; ugotavlja, da razprava o razpoložljivosti preskrbe ni dobro dokumentirana ali utemeljena, da poročevalec ni imel dostopa do študij glede optimalne ravni razpoložljivosti preskrbe s sladkorjem ali možnih scenarijev, ki prikazujejo posledice pomanjkanja sladkorja, ter možnih odzivov (in ustreznih stroškov) v primeru večje motnje na svetovnem trgu sladkorja;
Special Report No 6/2010, Commission reply, point 58. , taking into account the opening of the Union market to third countries; notes that the discussion on availability of supply is not well documented or substantiated, the rapporteur had no access to any studies regarding the optimum level of sugar availability or possible scenarios demonstrating the consequences of its unavailability and the possible reactions (and the relevant costs) in case of a major disruption of the world sugar market;
Del IX – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 8/2010 z naslovom „Izboljševanje prevozne zmogljivosti na vseevropskih železniških oseh: ali so bile investicije EU v železniško infrastrukturo uspešne?“
Part I X - Special Report No 8/2010 of the Court of Auditors entitled "Improving transport performance on Trans-European rail axes: Have EU rail infrastructure investments been effective?"