natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice lahko določijo, da je treba zahtevek za revizijo v skladu s členom [38f] (1) vložiti:
Member States may provide that the application for review in accordance with Article [38f](1) must be made:
(a) pred potekom vsaj 30 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je
(a) before the expiry of at least 30 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which
– naročnik objavil obvestilo o oddaji naročila v skladu s členom 22(4) ter členoma 23 in 24 , če to obvestilo vključuje utemeljitev izbire naročnika, da sklene pogodbo brez predhodne objave obvestila o naročilu v Uradnem listu Evropske unije; ali
- the contracting authority published a contract award notice in accordance with Articles 22(4), 23 and 24, provided that this notice includes justification of the decision of the contracting authority to award the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union; or
– naročnik obvestil zadevne ponudnike in kandidate o oddaji naročila, če to obvestilo vsebuje povzetek ustreznih razlogov, kot je navedeno v členu 26(2), ob upoštevanju člena 26(3).
- the contracting authority informed the tenderers and candidates concerned of the conclusion of the contract, provided that this information contains a summary of the relevant reasons as referred to in Article 26(2), subject to Article 26(3).
To velja tudi za primere iz člena [38d](c); ter
This option also applies to the cases referred to in Article [38d](c); and
b) vsekakor pred potekom obdobja vsaj šestih mesecev od dneva, ki sledi datumu sklenitve pogodbe.
(b) in any case , before the expiry of a period of at least 6 months with effect from the day following the date of the conclusion of the contract.
V vseh drugih primerih, vključno z zahtevki za revizijo v skladu s členom [38g](1), so roki za vložitev zahtevka za revizijo določeni z nacionalnim pravom, ob upoštevanju določb člena [38e].
In all other cases, including applications for a review in accordance with Article [38g](1), the time limits for the application for a review shall be determined by national law, subject to Article [38e].
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 2f direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 2f of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Člen 38 i (novo)
Article 38 i (new)
Člen 38i
Article 38i
Popravni mehanizem
Corrective mechanism
Komisija se lahko sklicuje na postopek, ki je predviden v odstavkih od 2 do 5, kadar meni, da je bila med postopkom oddaje javnega naročila, ki spada na področje uporabe te direktive, povzročena hujša kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil.
The Commission may invoke the procedure provided for in paragraphs 2 to 5 when it considers that a serious infringement of Community law in the field of public procurement has been committed during a contract award procedure falling within the scope of this Directive.
Komisija uradno obvesti zadevno državo članico in naročnika o razlogih, ki so pripeljali do sklepa, da je bila povzročena hujša kršitev, ter zahteva, da se to popravi.
The Commission shall notify the Member State and the contracting authority concerned of the reasons which have led it to conclude that a serious infringement has been committed and request its correction.
Zadevni državi članici postavi razumen rok za odgovor ob upoštevanju okoliščin v zadevnem primeru.
It shall allow the Member State concerned a reasonable period within which to reply, having regard to the circumstances of the case in question .
V roku iz odstavka 2 zadevna država članica Komisiji sporoči:
Within the period referred to in paragraph 2, the Member State concerned shall communicate to the Commission:
(a) svojo potrditev, da je bila kršitev odpravljena ali
(a) its confirmation that the infringement has been corrected;
(b) utemeljene razloge, zakaj popravek ni bil narejen, ali
(b) a reasoned submission as to why no correction has been made; or
(c) obvestilo, da je naročnik na svojo lastno pobudo ali na podlagi pooblastil, določenih v členu [38b](1)(a), postopek oddaje javnega naročila začasno prekinil.
(c) a notice to the effect that the contract award procedure has been suspended either by the contracting authority on its own initiative or on the basis of the powers specified in Article [38b](1)(a).
Utemeljeni razlogi, posredovani na podlagi odstavka 3(b), se med drugim lahko opirajo na dejstvo, da je domnevna kršitev že predmet sodnega ali drugega revizijskega postopka ali revizije iz člena [38b](9).
In a submission communicated pursuant to paragraph 3(b), it may in particular be indicated that the alleged infringement is already the subject of judicial proceedings or of another procedure or review pursuant to Article [38b](9).
V takšnem primeru država članica obvesti Komisijo o izidu teh postopkov ali revizije takoj, ko je ta znan.
In this case the Member State shall inform the Commission of the outcome of th os e proceedings , or that procedure or review, as soon as it is known.
Kadar je bilo dano obvestilo, da je postopek oddaje javnega naročila začasno ustavljen v skladu z odstavkom 3(c), država članica uradno obvesti Komisijo, ko začasna ustavitev preneha ali se začne drugi postopek za oddajo javnega naročila, ki se v celoti ali deloma nanaša na isti predmet.
Where notice has been given that a contract award procedure has been suspended in accordance with paragraph 3(c), the Member State shall notify the Commission when the suspension is lifted or another contract procedure relating in whole or in part to the same subject matter is begun.
S tem novim obvestilom država članica potrdi, da je bila domnevna kršitev odpravljena, ali pa vanj vključi utemeljeno razlago, zakaj kršitev ni bila odpravljena.
That notification shall confirm that the alleged infringement has been corrected or include a reasoned submission as to why no correction has been made.
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 3 direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 3 of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Člen 38 j (novo)
Article 38 j (new)
Člen 38j
Article 38j
Vsebina obvestila o prostovoljni predhodni preglednosti
Content of a notice for voluntary ex-ante transparency
Obvestilo iz druge alineje člena [38f](4), katerega obliko v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom iz člena 41(2) sprejme Komisija, vsebuje naslednje podatke:
The notice referred to in the second indent of Article [38f](4), the format of which shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 41(2), shall contain the following information:
(a) ime in kontaktne podatke naročnika,
(a) the name and contact details of the contracting authority;
(b) opis predmeta naročila,
(b) a description of the object of the contract;
(c) utemeljitev odločitve naročnika o oddaji naročila brez predhodne objave obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije,
(c) a justification of the decision of the contracting authority to award the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union;
(d) ime in kontaktne podatke gospodarskega subjekta, v čigar korist je bila sprejeta odločitev o oddaji naročila, in
(d) the name and contact details of the economic operator in favour of whom a contract award decision has been taken;
(e) po potrebi vse druge podatke, ki se naročniku zdijo koristni.
(e) where approp ria te, any other information deemed useful by the contracting authority.
(Ta predlog spremembe temelji na členu 3a direktive 89/665/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z direktivo 2007/66/ES.)
(This amendment is based on Article 3a of Directive 89/665/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC.)
Člen 41 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 2
Article 41 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Kar zadeva popravek pragov iz člena 6, se roki iz člena 5a(3c), (4in (4e) Sklepa 1999/468/ES določijo na dva tedna , zaradi časovnih omejitev, ki so posledica načina izračuna in objave iz drugega pododstavka člena 78(1) in člena 78(4) Direktive 2004/18/ES.
With regard to the revision of the thresholds laid down in Article 6, the time limits laid down in Article 5a, paragraphs (3c), (4b) and (4e) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at two weeks , in view of the time constraints resulting from the calculation and publication methods laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 78(1) and Article 78(4) of Directive 2004/18/EC.
Kar zadeva popravek pragov iz člena 6, se roki iz člena 5a(3c), (4b) in (4e) Sklepa 1999/468/ES določijo na en mesec , zaradi časovnih omejitev, ki so posledica načina izračuna in objave iz drugega pododstavka člena 78(1) in člena 78(4) Direktive 2004/18/ES.
With regard to the revision of the thresholds laid down in Article 6, the time limits laid down in Article 5a, paragraphs (3c), (4b) and (4e) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at one month , in view of the time constraints resulting from the calculation and publication methods laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 78(1) and Article 78(4) of Directive 2004/18/EC.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za javna naročila, ki se oddajo na področju obrambe in varnosti, razen za naročila, za katera se uporablja Direktiva XXXX/X/ES.
This Directive shall apply to public contracts awarded in the fields of defence and security with the exception of contracts to which Directive XXXX/X/EC applies.
Ne uporablja se za javna naročila, ki so izključena iz področja uporabe Direktive XXXX/X/ES na podlagi členov 8 in 9 Direktive.“
It shall not apply to public contracts excluded from the scope of Directive XXXX/X/EC pursuant to Articles 8 and 9 thereof.
Ta direktiva se brez poseganja v člen 296 pogodbe uporablja za javna naročila, ki se oddajo na področju obrambe in varnosti, razen za naročila, za katera se uporablja Direktiva XXXX/X/ES.
Without prejudice to Article 296 of the Treaty, this Directive shall apply to public contracts awarded in the fields of defence and security with the exception of contracts to which Directive XXXX/X/EC applies.
Komisija bo Evropskemu parlamentu do ...* poročala o ukrepih držav članic za prenos te direktive, zlasti člena 39 in 40.
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament by ...* on the measures taken by Member States to transpose this Directive, in particular Articles 39 and 40 thereof.
Komisija najpozneje ...** Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu redno predloži poročilo o izvajanju te direktive in njenemu vplivu na razvoj evropskega trga obrambne opreme ter evropske obrambne tehnološke in industrijske baze.
The Commission shall, beginning not later than ...**, regularly submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this D irective and its impact on developments in the European defence equipment market and the European defence technological and industrial base.
* Dvanajst mesecev po datumu prenosa te direktive.
* Twelve months from the date of transposition of this Directive.
** Pet let po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
** Five years from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
60110000-2 do 60183000-4 (razen 60160000-7, 60161000-4) in 64120000-3 do 64121200-2
From 60110000-2 to 60183000-4 (except 60160000-7, 60161000-4), and from 64120000-3 to 64121200-2
60100000-9, od 60110000-2 do 60183000-4 (razen 60160000-7, 60161000-4), od 63100000-0 do 63111000-0, od 63120000-6 do 63121100-4, 63122000-0, od 63520000-0 do 63700000-6, in 64120000-3 do 64121200-2
60100000-9, from 60110000-2 to 60183000-4 (except 60160000-7, 60161000-4), from 63100000-0 to 63111000-0, from 63120000-6 to 63121100-4, 63122000-0, from 63520000-0 to 63700000-6, and from 64120000-3 to 64121200-2
Da bi bile gradnje, blago in/ali storitve, ki so zajete v tej direktivi, vključene v celoti, je treba dopolniti prilogo.
In order to ensure that the inclusion of public works, supply and/or service contracts which is provided for in this Directive is complete, the Annex must be expanded.
60410000-5 do 60424120-3 (razen 60411000-2, 60421000-5) in 60500000-3
From 60410000-5 to 60424120-3 (except 60411000-2, 60421000-5), and 60500000-3
60400000-2, od 60410000-5 do 60424120-3 (razen 60411000-2, 60421000-5), 60500000-3 , od 63100000-0 do 63111000-0, od 63120000-6 do 63121100-4, 63122000-0, 63520000-0, 63521000-7, 63524000-8, in 63700000-6
60400000-2, from 60410000-5 to 60424120-3 (except 60411000-2, 60421000-5), 60500000-3 , from 63100000-0 to 63111000-0, from 63120000-6 to 63121100-4, 63122000-0, 63520000-0, 63521000-7, 63524000-8, and 63700000-6
Storitve železniškega prevoza
Rail transport services
Logistika ni le prevoz blaga, saj doda vrednost s kombinacijo storitev, kot so prevoz, skladiščenje, celotno upravljanje dobavne verige ter obravnavanje pretoka informacij.
Logistics is not only transport of goods, but adds value with a mix of services like transportation, warehousing and storage, total supply chain management, and the handling of information flow.
Zato bi morale biti nekatere posebne storitve, povezane z logistiko, vključene v zakonodajni predlog, da bi preprečili napake v prihodnjih pravilih javnega naročanja na področju obrambe in varnosti.
Therefore, certain specific logistic related services should be included in the legislative proposal to avoid flaws in the future public procurement rules in the fields of defence and security.
Priloga I – vrstica 4 b (novo)
Annex I - row 4 b (new)
Storitve prevoza po vodi
Water trans-port services
Za evropske trge orožja je značilna razdrobljenost.
European arms markets are characterised by their fragmentation.
V 90-ih letih prejšnjega stoletja se je Evropska unija začela zavedati, da ima to negativne posledice za gospodarstvo.
Since the 1990s the realisation has been growing within the EU that this fragmentation has adverse economic consequences.
Razlogi so različni:
There are a number of reasons for this state of affairs:
a) Zaradi geopolitičnega razvoja so se izdatki za obrambo v zadnjih 20 letih prepolovili (t. i. mirovne dividende), kar je povzročilo zmanjšanje dobička in števila zaposlenih pri proizvajalcih orožja, pa tudi upad naložb na področju raziskav in tehnologije.
a) In response to geopolitical developments, over the last 20 years defence expenditure has fallen by half (the so-called peace dividend), leading to reductions in the turnover generated and the number of people employed by arms manufacturers and cutbacks in investment in the areas of research and technology.
Zaenkrat nič ne kaže na povečanje teh izdatkov.
No increase in defence spending is likely in the immediate future.
Njihova podrobna razdelitev je videti takole
In detailed terms, that spending breaks down as follows
Podatki Evropske obrambne agencije.
Information from the European Defence Agency.
Glej http://www.eda.europa.eu/facts.aspx. :
See http://www.eda.europa.eu/facts.aspx. :
Leta 2006 so izdatki EU-26
In 2006 defence spending by the EU-26
Danska ne sodeluje v Evropski obrambni agenciji. na področju obrambe znašali 201 milijard EUR (v razponu od 47 milijard EUR v Združenem kraljestvu do 35 milijard EUR na Malti).
Denmark is not involved in the work of the European Defence Agency. amounted to € 201 billion (ranging between € 47 bn in the United Kingdom and € 35 m in Malta).
Ta znesek vključuje 110 milijard EUR za odhodke za zaposlene in 91 milijard EUR za javna naročila za obrambo.
This amount includes € 110 bn for expenditure on personnel and € 91 for defence material procurement.
91 milijard EUR je seštevek 39 milijard EUR za naložbe, vključno z izdatki za raziskave in razvoj, 43 milijard EUR za delovanje in vzdrževanje ter 9 milijard EUR za druge odhodke, npr. za infrastrukturo in gradnje.
The figure of € 91 bn breaks down further into spending of € 39 bn on investment, including research and development, € 43 bn on operations and maintenance and € 9 bn for other expenditure items, including infrastructure and building measures.
Če te številke primerjamo z izdatki v ZDA, dobimo naslednjo sliko
A comparison of these figures with US spending in this area gives the following picture
http://www.eda.europa.eu/genericitem.aspx?area=Facts&id=310. : ZDA so leta 2006 za obrambo skupaj porabile 491 milijard EUR oz.
http://www.eda.europa.eu/genericitem.aspx?area=Facts&id=310. : in 2006 the USA spent a total of € 491 bn, or 4.7% of GDP, on defence.
b) Stroški za razvoj novega orožja so tako narasli, da celo velike države članice težko prenašajo finančno breme
b) The cost of developing new weapons systems has risen so much that even the larger Member States have difficulty in bearing the financial burden involved.
Glej Burkard Schmitt, From cooperation to integration, Defence and Aerospace Industries in Europe, Chaillot Paper 40, Pariz, julij 2000, str.
See Burkard Schmitt, ‘From cooperation to integration, Defence and Aerospace Industries in Europe’, Chaillot Paper 40, Paris, July 2000, p.
6 in naprej. .
6 et seq.
c) Z nastankom novih oboroženih sil po koncu hladne vojne se je tradicionalna oprema začela naročati v manjšem številu, pojavile pa so se tudi zahteve po kakovostno drugačnih obrambnih zmogljivostih.
c) The restructuring of armed forces following the end of the Cold War has led to traditional items of equipment being ordered in smaller numbers and created requirements for qualitatively different defence capabilities.
Cilj je torej doseči večjo stroškovno učinkovitost, kar bo koristilo tako nacionalnim proračunom kot oborožitveni industriji, obenem pa bodo oborožene sile dobile najboljšo možno opremo.
The aim is therefore to achieve greater cost efficiency, thereby benefiting both national budgets and the arms industry, and, just as importantly, to provide the armed forces with the best possible equipment.
Vzpostavitev evropske varnostne in obrambne politike zahteva izgradnjo potrebnih zmogljivosti, za kar je potrebna učinkovita evropska industrija.
The establishment of a European security and defence policy makes it necessary to build up the necessary capacities, for which purpose a high-performance European industry is needed.
To naj bi med drugim dosegli z oblikovanjem baze za evropsko obrambno tehnologijo in industrijo ter evropskega trga obrambne opreme.
The establishment of a European defence technology and defence industry base and a European market for the procurement of material is intended to contribute to this.
Oboje bi omogočilo potrebne zmogljivosti za izpolnitev svetovnih obrambnih nalog in obravnavanje novih izzivov na področju varnosti.
The two can supply the capabilities required to meet global defence tasks and cope with the new challenges in the area of security.
Člen 296 Pogodbe ES
Article 296 of the EC Treaty
Načeloma spada oddaja javnih naročil na področju obrambe v področje uporabe direktive 2004/18/ES (člen 10), pri čemer je treba upoštevati člen 296 Pogodbe ES, ki določa odstopanje od pravil EU za javna naročila zaradi nacionalne varnosti.
In principle, defence procurement falls within the scope of Directive 2004/18/EC (Article 10), subject to the provisions of Article 296 TEC, which provides for a derogation from EU procurement rules on grounds of national security.
Vendar v praksi države članice sistematično uporabljajo člen 296 Pogodbe ES, da bi skoraj vsa javna naročila za vojaške namene izvzele iz prava Skupnosti.
In practice, however, the Member States systematically invoke Article 296 TEC in order to exclude almost all military procurement from the scope of Community law.
Podobno velja za trg z občutljivo nevojaško varnostno opremo, ki z gospodarskega vidika postaja vedno pomembnejši.
The situation is little different on the economically increasingly important market in sensitive non-military security equipment.
V obeh primerih se države članice pogosto sklicujejo na člen 14 direktive 2004/18/ES, da bi zaobšle pravila Skupnosti.
In both cases, the Member States frequently invoke Article 14 of Directive 2004/18/EC in order to circumvent Community rules.
Tako je večina naročil na tem področju oddana na podlagi nacionalnih pravil in postopkov.
Accordingly, most contracts in this area are awarded on the basis of national rules and procedures.
Statistični podatki kažejo, da je 15 držav članic EU v obdobju med letoma 2000 in 2004 v uradnem listu objavilo le 13 % vseh naročil za obrambno opremo, pri čemer je bila razlika med državami med 2 % (v Nemčiji) in 24 % (v Franciji)
According to statistics, over the period between 2000 and 2004 the EU-15 States published only 13% of all contracts for defence equipment in the Official Journal, with the figures for individual Member States ranging between 2% (in Germany) and 24% (in France)
Tako so odstopanja, ki bi v skladu s pravom Skupnosti morala biti izjeme, postala pravilo.
Thus derogations which according to Community law ought to be exceptional are in fact the rule.
Praksa držav članic je v nasprotju s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, ki je določilo, da je mogoče člen 296 Pogodbe ES uveljavljati le v izjemnih in utemeljenih primerih
This practice by the Member States violates the case law of the Court of Justice of the EC, which has established that Article 296 of the EC Treaty may be invoked only in limited and justified exceptional cases.
V obrazložitvenem sporočilu je Komisija podala zaključke na podlagi te sodne prakse in razložila, kako namerava v teh primerih ravnati v prihodnje
In an interpretative communication, the Commission has drawn the necessary conclusions from this case law and explained how it proposes to proceed in such cases in future.
Obrazložitveno sporočilo o uporabi člena 296 Pogodbe na področju javnih naročil za obrambo COM(20060779). .
Interpretative communication on the application of Article 296 of the Treaty on the establishment of the European Communities (TEC) in the field of defence procurement, COM(2006) 779.
Direktiva o javnih naročilih za obrambo
Directive on Defence Procurement
S predlogom direktive, ki ga tu obravnavamo (KOM(2007) 766), naj bi upoštevali pomislek držav članic, ali direktiva 2004/18/ES dovolj upošteva posebnosti javnih naročil za vojaške namene.
The proposal for a directive under consideration here (COM(2007) 766) is designed to allay the Member States' misgivings as to whether the existing Directive 2004/18/EC takes sufficient account of the specific nature of military procurement.
Komisija je ta predlog predstavila 5. decembra 2007 skupaj s predlogom direktive o poenostavitvi pogojev za prenose obrambnih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti (KOM(2007) 765) ter svojim sporočilom
The proposal for a directive was presented on 5 December 2007 together with the proposal for a directive on transfers of defence-related products within the Community (COM(2007) 765) and a Commission communication.
Strategija za močnejšo in konkurenčnejšo evropsko obrambno industrijo, KOM(2007)0764 . .
A strategy for a stronger and more competitive European defence industry, COM(2007) 764.
Cilj obeh direktiv je vzpostavitev skupnega trga orožja, vendar na podlagi instrumentov, ki jih je treba obravnavati ločeno.
Both directives aim to establish a common arms market, but using instruments which must be considered separately.
Cilj predloga direktive je ustvariti enoten evropski pravni okvir, ki bo državam članicam omogočal uporabo prava Skupnosti, ne da bi bili pri tem ogroženi njihovi varnostni interesi.
The aim of the proposal for a directive is to establish a uniform European legal framework which enables the Member States to apply Community law without jeopardising their security interests.
Upati je, da se bodo zaradi tega redkeje sklicevale na člen 296 Pogodbe ES.
The hope is that, as a result, they will less frequently feel obliged to invoke Article 296 TEC.
Z drugimi besedami to pomeni, da ta člen še vedno velja, vendar je omejen na resnično izjemne primere, kot je določeno v Pogodbi ES in kot je zahtevalo Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti.
To put it another way, Article 296 TEC remains in force, but its use is to be restricted to genuinely exceptional cases, as provided for in the EC Treaty and as called for by the European Court of Justice.