natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7-0013/2010 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7‑0013/2010 ),
3. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter vladi Združenih držav Amerike.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the government of the United States of America.
Po terorističnih napadih 11. septembra 2001 je ministrstvo za finance ZDA razvilo program za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti, v okviru katerega je z upravnimi sodnimi pozivi zahtevalo, da tudi združenje SWIFT posreduje podatke o finančnih transakcijah
After 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks, the US Treasury developed the 'Terrorist Finance Tracking Program' (TFTP), under which it required, by means of administrative subpoenas, also SWIFT
Združenje za svetovne finančne telekomunikacije med bankami (SWIFT - Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication ), ustanovljeno v skladu z belgijskim pravom, je ponudnik storitev za varno izmenjavo podatkov za finančne transakcije, ki ima približno 8500 strank, med katerimi je približno 7800 finančnih institucij. .
Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, established under Belgian law is a secure messaging provider for financial transactions, with around 8500 clients, of which around7800 are financial institutions. to transfer financial messaging data.
Številni od teh podatkov so iz držav članic EU.
Many of these data originate in EU Member States.
Sredi leta 2006 so mediji v ZDA razkrili, da obstoj tega programa povzroča veliko nasprotovanja v EU.
Mid 2006 US media disclosed the existence of the TFTP causing significant controversy in the EU.
Zato sta v začetku leta 2007 Svet in Komisija začela pogovore z ministrstvom za finance ZDA.
As a consequence, Council and Commission (EC) engaged in discussions with US Treasury early 2007.
Po teh pogovorih je ministrstvo za finance ZDA junija 2007 sprejelo vrsto enostranskih zavez EU (tako imenovana stališča o programu za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti).
Following these discussions, US Treasury made a series of unilateral commitments to the EU in June 2007 (the so-called TFTP Representations).
Marca 2008 je Evropska komisija objavila, da je kot „ugledno evropsko osebnost“, ki bo odgovorna za preverjanje, da ZDA izvajajo program za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnost v skladu s svojimi stališči, imenovala sodnika Jean-Louisa Bruguièreja.
In March 2008 the EC announced that it had designated Judge Jean-Louis Bruguière as the so-called 'eminent' European person in charge of verifying US compliance with the TFTP “Representations”.
Prvo poročilo je bilo pripravljeno decembra 2008.
A first report was produced in December 2008.
Sodnik Bruguière je ravno pripravil svoje drugo in končno poročilo.
Judge Bruguière has just produced his second and final report.
Poročevalka je prejela kopijo (z oznako zaupnosti „EU Restricted“) v ponedeljek, 1. februarja 2010.
Your rapporteur received a copy (classified EU restricted) on Monday 1 February 2010.
Do nedavnega je združenje SWIFT shranjevalo podatke na dveh povsem enakih („zrcalnih“) strežnikih, ki sta se nahajala v Evropi in ZDA, da bi izboljšalo dostopnost podatkov.
Until recently SWIFT stored messages on two identical ("mirror") servers in order to enhance data resilience, located in Europe and the US.
Oktobra 2007 pa je združenje napovedalo novo zasnovo prenosa podatkov, v kateri se od 1. januarja 2010 podatki o transakcijah znotraj EU (vključno s podatki, ki jih izmenjujejo države, povezane z evropskim območjem) obdelujejo in shranjujejo izključno v Evropi.
In October 2007, however, SWIFT announced its new messaging architecture according to which, as from 1 January 2010, intra-EU message data (including messages exchanged between countries connected to the European zone) will now exclusively be processed and stored within Europe.
Kar zadeva program za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti, je posledica ta, da velik del podatkov, ki so bili podlaga za sodne pozive v okviru tega programa, ne bo več shranjen v ZDA, zaradi česar ZDA ne bodo imele več dostopa do velikega dela podatkov združenja SWIFT, ki so jih prejemale v okviru prejšnje zasnove.
As far as the TFTP is concerned, the net effect is that a significant part of the data which have formed the basis of TFTP subpoenas will no longer be stored in the US, shutting-off US access to much of the SWIFT data it received under the former architecture.
Na zahtevo ZDA se je Svet odločil za pogajanja o (začasnem) mednarodnem sporazumu.
Following a US request the Council decided to negotiate an (interim) international agreement.
30. novembra 2009 je Svet podpisal začasni sporazum med EU in ZDA o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah za namene programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti , ki naj bi se izvajal začasno od 1. februarja 2010 do najpozneje 31. oktobra 2010, ko preneha veljati.
On 30 November 2009 Council signed an EU-US interim agreement on the processing and transfer of financial messaging data for the purposes of US TFTP (FMDA) to be provisionally applied as from 1 February 2010 and expire on 31 October 2010 at the latest.
V skladu z določbami Lizbonske pogodbe mora formalno sklenitev tega začasnega sporazuma odobriti Evropski parlament .
Under the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty the European Parliament's consent to the formal conclusion of this interim agreement is required.
Evropski parlament sporazum odobri ali ne (ni pa mogoče začeti novih pogajanj, ker je mednarodni sporazum že podpisan).
The European Parliament gives consent or not (while it will not be possible to renegotiate because the international agreement is already signed).
Pomen čezatlantskega sodelovanja za boj proti terorizmu
The importance of transatlantic cooperation for counter-terrorism purposes
Predvsem mora biti jasno, da poročevalka podpira odprto, demokratično, močno, atlantsko in navzven zazrto EU, ki je sposobna delovati kot pravi partner ZDA in ne njen nasprotnik.
Above all it must be clear that your rapporteur supports an open, democratic, strong, Atlanticist, outward-looking EU that is capable of acting shoulder to shoulder as a true counterpart to the US, not counterweight.
EU in ZDA sta nedvomno bliže ena drugi, kot je katera od njiju blizu kateremu od drugih pomembnejših mednarodnih akterjev.
Without a doubt, the EU and the US are closer to one another than either is to any other major international actor.
Poročevalka želi opozoriti, da je Parlament pozdravil washingtonsko deklaracijo (28. oktobra 2009) o krepitvi čezatlantskega sodelovanja na področju pravice, svobode in varnosti v povezavi s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic in državljanskih svoboščin ter da pripisuje velik pomen potrebi po čezatlantskem sodelovanju.
Your rapporteur wishes to recall that Parliament welcomed the "Washington Declaration" (28 October 2009) on enhancing transatlantic cooperation in the area of Justice, Freedom and Security within a context of respect for human rights and civil liberties, and places strong emphasis on the need for transatlantic cooperation.
Poudarja, da je potrebno stalno in močnejše sodelovanje med zakonodajalcema ZDA in EU pri vprašanjih, ki so v skupnem interesu, in je prepričana, da bi bilo treba okvir čezatlantskega sodelovanja za namene boja proti terorizmu dodatno razvijati in izboljšati.
She underlines the necessity for continued and stronger cooperation between US and EU legislators on issues of common concern and is convinced that the framework of transatlantic cooperation for counter-terrorism purposes should be further developed and improved.
Od 11. septembra 2001 sta se EU in ZDA pogajala o več sporazumih, ki zadevajo vprašanja s področja pravosodja in notranjih zadev.
Since 11 September 2001 the EU and the USA have negotiated several agreements covering JHA issues.
O vsakem sporazumu so potekala ločena pogajanja s številnimi skupnimi težavami, zlasti glede osebnih podatkov in pravnega varstva.
Each agreement was being negotiated individually with many of the same problems, notably in relation to personal data - and legal protection.
Da bi presegli te ponavljajoče se težave je Parlament zahteval (od leta 2003) opredelitev skladnega pravnega okvira EU za varstvo podatkov ter pogajanja za sklenitev zavezujočega čezatlantskega sporazuma o tem vprašanju.
To overcome these recurrent difficulties Parliament required (and since 2003) the definition of a coherent EU legal framework for data protection as well as the negotiations for a transatlantic binding agreement on this issue.
6. novembra 2006 je bila ustanovljena kontaktna skupina na visoki ravni EU-ZDA, da bi razpravljala o „varstvu zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov pri izmenjavi podatkov zaradi odkrivanja in pregona kaznivih dejanj v okviru širšega razmisleka med EU in ZDA o tem, kako najbolje preprečevati terorizem in težji mednarodni kriminal ter se boriti proti njima“.
On 6 November 2006 an EU-US High Level Contact Group was set up in order to discuss "privacy and personal data protection in the context of the exchange of information for law enforcement purposes as part of a wider reflection between the EU and the US on how best to prevent and fight terrorism and serious transnational crime".
28. maja 2008 je skupina pripravila svoje zadnje poročilo, v katerem je opredelila zelo splošna načela.
On 28 May 2008 the Group produced its final report setting out very general principles.
Ministrsko srečanje med ZDA in EU za področje pravosodja in notranjih zadev 12. decembra 2008 je opredelilo vrsto skupnih načel in nekatera odprta vprašanja, povezana z varstvom zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov, ter izrazilo namen čim prej začeti pogajanja o zavezujočem mednarodnem sporazumu.
The US-EU JHA Ministerial, meeting on 12 December 2008, stated that it had identified a wide range of common principles plus certain outstanding issues relating to privacy and personal data protection, and that their aim is to start negotiation of a binding international agreement as soon as possible.
Poročevalka meni, da je takšen zavezujoč mednarodni sporazum – ne pa zgolj seznam načel, če naj imajo kakršno koli dodano vrednost – bistvenega pomena.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that such a binding international agreement, and not just a list of principles if it were to have any added value, is of crucial importance.
Sporazum bi se moral uporabljati za posamične zahteve in po potrebi za samodejne skupinske prenose.
The agreement is to be applied to individual requests and, where appropriate, automated bulk transfers.
Poleg tega je izjava iz decembra 2008 le politična zaveza, kateri bodo morali slediti ukrepi.
Moreover, the December 2008 statement is a political commitment only, and will need to be acted upon.
V skladu s stockholmskim programom, ki je bil sprejet 10. decembra 2009, bi se morala pogajanja o zavezujočem mednarodnem sporazumu začeti v naslednjih mesecih.
According to the 'Stockholm Programme' adopted on 10 December 2009 negotiations on a binding international agreement should start in the coming months.
Kar zadeva program za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti pa ga je treba obravnavati kot odstopanje od evropske zakonodaje in prakse o tem, kako bi organi pregona pridobili finančne podatke posameznikov za namene kazenskega pregona, in sicer izvršilni nalog, ki ga potrdi sodišče, ali sodni nalog za preučitev natančno določenih transakcij namesto zanašanja na široke upravne sodne pozive za več milijonov spisov.
As far as the TFTP is concerned, it must be considered as a departure from European law and practice in how law enforcement agencies would acquire individuals' financial records for law enforcement activities, namely individual court-approved warrants or subpoenas to examine specific transactions instead of relying on broad administrative subpoenas for millions of records.
Kot že omenjeno, je objava programa (v medijih v ZDA sredi leta 2006) razumljivo privedla do burnega nasprotovanja v EU, zlasti kar zadeva domnevno pomanjkanje skladnosti programa z obveznostmi iz direktive o varstvu podatkov (95/46/ES) ter zakoni držav članic o izvajanju te direktive.
As mentioned earlier the leak of the programme (by US media, mid 2006) led, and understandably so, to a storm of protest in the EU - in particular as regards the TFTP's perceived lack of compatibility with the obligations under the Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) as well as Member States' laws implementing that Directive.
Poleg tega je nekaj, kar se je začelo kot nujen začasen ukrep (odziv na dogodke 11. septembra 2001) dejansko postalo stalen ukrep brez izrecne odobritve ali dovoljenja organov EU ali resnične čezatlantske ocene o učinku in v prihodnost usmerjenih pogajanj, ki bi sočasno zajemala varnost, pravosodno sodelovanje in vpliv varstva podatkov.
Furthermore, what might have kicked off as an urgent temporary measure (in reply to 9/11) became de facto permanent without specific approval or authorisation by EU authorities or a real transatlantic evaluation of its impact and forward looking transatlantic negotiations covering at the same time security, judicial cooperation and data protection impact.
Takšen postopek jasno ni pripomogel k vzpostavljanju medsebojnega zaupanja za čezatlantsko sodelovanje za namene boja proti terorizmu.
Clearly, such proceedings did not help in building up mutual trust for transatlantic cooperation on counter-terrorism purposes.
Ni mogoče zanikati, da s predlaganim sporazumom o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah – gre za sporazum, ki nima omejenega roka veljavnosti – EU še naprej odstopa ZDA izvajanje svojih obveščevalnih dejavnosti na finančnem področju.
With the proposed FMDA, an open-ended arrangement, it cannot be denied that the EU continues to outsource its financial intelligence service to the US.
Glede tega poročevalka soglaša z združenjem SWIFT, da v sedanji razpravi ne gre toliko za samo združenje kot pa za to, kako bi lahko Evropa sodelovala z ZDA za namene boja proti terorizmu in kako se od ponudnikov storitev na področju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah zahteva, da prispevajo k temu boju , oziroma splošneje, kako se podatki, zbrani v komercialne namene, uporabljajo pri kazenskem pregonu.
In that respect, your rapporteur agrees with SWIFT that the current debate is not about SWIFT as such but about how Europe could cooperate with the US for counter-terrorism purposes and how financial messaging data providers are requested to contribute to this fight , or indeed more generally the law enforcement use of data collected for commercial purposes.
Prepričana je tudi, da se ne sme ogrožati evropskih pravnih zahtev za pravično, sorazmerno in zakonito obdelavo osebnih podatkov ter da EU in njene države članice doslej niso bile dovolj odločne in jasne pri določanju svojih ciljev.
She also believes that European legal requirements for the fair, proportionate and lawful processing of personal information cannot be compromised and that the EU and its Member States, up to now, have been insufficiently strong and clear to set their own objectives.
Pravni vidiki sporazuma o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah (neizčrpno)
Legal considerations FMDA (non-exhaustive)
Ob upoštevanju bistvenih elementov resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 17. septembra 2009 o tej zadevi bi poročevalka želela pripomniti naslednje glede besedila sporazuma:
Having in mind the main elements of the 17 September 2009 European Parliament resolution on the matter, your rapporteur would like to make the following comments on the text of the agreement:
O načelu sorazmernosti: Združenje SWIFT iz tehničnih in upravljavskih razlogov ne more iskati po „vsebini“ sporočil, torej ne more iskati podatkov, ki temeljijo na merilih, kot so imena, naslovi in/ali številke računov posameznikov.
On the principle of proportionality: SWIFT cannot, for technical and governance reasons, search the 'content' of the messages, and thus cannot search data based on criteria like names, addresses and/or invoice numbers of individuals.
Če bi torej združenje SWIFT prejelo (člen 4 sporazuma o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah) zaprosilo za pridobitev podatkov denimo v zvezi s posameznikom, teh podatkov iz tehničnih razlogov ne bi moglo posredovati.
Therefore if SWIFT were to receive a (Article 4, FMDA) request to produce data related to e.g. an individual, SWIFT will not be able to produce that specific data because of technical reasons.
Namesto tega lahko daje „skupinske podatke“.
SWIFT could provide instead 'data in bulk'.
Ta sporočila lahko vsebujejo tudi posamične podatke (kot so ime ali naslov posameznika), ki jih oblasti potrebujejo za boj proti terorizmu.
These messages may eventually contain the specific data (e.g. the name or the address of an individual) that the authority needs for counter terrorism purposes.
Torej se zaradi same narave združenja SWIFT se mogoče sklicevati na t. im. omejene zahteve.
So, by the very nature of SWIFT it is not possible to refer to so-called limited requests.
Omenjeno pomeni, da mora združenje SWIFT posredovati vse ali skoraj vse svoje podatke finančnemu ministrstvu ZDA.
The above-mentioned implies that SWIFT has to transfer all, or virtually all, of its data to US Treasury.
To krši temeljni načeli prava o varstvu podatkov , to sta načeli nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
That violates the basic principles of data protection law , i.e. the principles of necessity and proportionality.
Tega kasneje ni mogoče popraviti z mehanizmi spremljanja in nadzora.
This cannot be subsequently rectified by mechanisms of oversight and control.
Opomba: predpisi EU o sledenju dejavnosti za financiranje terorizma temeljijo na poročanju posameznih finančnih subjektov o sumljivih ali nepravilnih transakcijah.
NB: the EU's rules on tracking of terrorist financing activities are based on reporting of suspicious or irregular transactions by individual financial operators.
Dejansko bi bilo boljše, če bi se združenju SWIFT omogočilo, da si priskrbi opremo, ki bi bila potrebna za usmerjeno iskanje po podatkih, ki jih shranjuje in obdeluje, namesto da se vsi podatki skupno posredujejo ZDA.
In fact, it would be better to allow SWIFT to provide itself with the necessary equipment to make targeted searches itself in the data it stores and processes , rather than having all its data transferred in bulk to the US.
Tako bi se tudi ohranila podobnosti z delovanjem EU na področju hrambe podatkov ponudnikov telekomunikacijskih storitev.
That would also preserve the parallel with what the EU does in the field of data retention by telecom service providers.
Sporazum o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah ne določa izrecno, naj bodo zahteve o prenosu podatkov časovno omejene.
The FMDA does not expressly provide that transfer requests be limited in time .
Prav tako sporazum ne določa izrecno, naj bodo zahteve predmet sodne odobritve, ter ne opredeljuje dovolj natančno pogojev za posredovanje podatkov programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti s strani ZDA tretjim državam.
Equally, the FMDA does not expressly provide that transfer requests be subject to judicial authorisation , nor does it define sufficiently the conditions for sharing TFTP data with third countries by the US.
Javni nadzor in spremljanje dostopa oblasti do podatkov SWIFT nista določena, čeprav je izvrševanje sporazuma o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah pod nadzorom nadzornih odborov kongresa ZDA.
The public control and oversight of the authorities' access to SWIFT data is not defined even if the FMDA functioning is under the control of the US Congress Oversight Committees.
Sporazum določa, da je treba vse neizločene podatke po izbrisati po določenem obdobju.
The FMDA provides for the erasure of all non-extracted data after a specified period.
Vseeno pa se izločeni podatki „hranijo za obdobje, ki je obvezno za posamezne državne organe (...)“.
However, the information extracted "shall be subject to the retention period applicable to the particular government (...)".
V sporazumu ni nakazano, kakšna so ta obdobje hrambe .
The FMDA provides no indication of what these retention periods are .
Pravice do dostopa, popravka, nadomestila in sodnih mehanizmov zunaj EU za subjekte, na katere se nanašajo podatki, niso zadostno določene.
The rights of access, rectification, compensation and redress outside the EU for data subjects are not defined adequately.
Sporazum ne jamči evropskim državljanom in družbam enakih pravic in jamstev v skladu s pravom ZDA, kot bi jih uživali na ozemlju EU.
The FMDA does not guarantee European citizens and companies the same rights and guarantees under US law as they would enjoy in the territory of the EU .
Nadalje sporazum o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah ne določa, pod katerimi pogoji naj se posameznik ali družbo zunaj ozemlja ZDA obvestita, da je bila zoper njiju sprejeta neugodna upravna odločitev.
Furthermore, the FMDA does not indicate under what circumstances an individual or company outside the territory of the US is to be informed of the fact that an unfavourable administrative decision has been taken against him/it.
Svet sicer vztraja, da „je v interesu EU zagotoviti trajnost programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti ne glede na novo zgradbo združenja SWIFT in tako zagotoviti pravno varnost za posredovanje pomembnih podatkov finančnemu ministrstvu ZDA, saj so službe držav članic glavni koristniki informacij programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti“, vseeno pa ni mogoče trditi, da gre za pravo vzajemnost .
While Council insists that "it is in the EU’s interest to ensure the sustainability of the TFTP notwithstanding SWIFT’s new architecture, and thus to ensure legal certainty for the transfer of relevant data to the US Treasury Department, as Member State Services have been the main beneficiaries of TFTP leads", it is impossible to claim true reciprocity .
Za pravo vzajemnost bi morale oblasti ZDA organom EU dovoliti pridobitev in rabo podatkov o sporočilih o plačilih in z njimi povezanih podatkov, ki se hranijo na strežnikih v ZDA.
True reciprocity would require the US authorities to allow the EU authorities to obtain and use financial payment messaging and related data stored in servers in the US.
Poleg tega Svet , v zvezi s predlaganim sporazumom o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah, ni pojasnil natančne vloge „javnega organa“, ki naj mu bo zaupana naloga, da prejme zahteve finančnega ministrstva ZDA (ob upoštevanju zlasti narave pooblastil, zaupanih takemu „organu“, in načina, kako je mogoče ta pooblastila izvrševati).
Furthermore, in relation to the proposed FMDA, Council failed to clarify the precise role of the 'public authority' to be designated with the responsibility to receive requests from US Treasury (taking into account in particular the nature of the powers vested in such an 'authority' and the way in which such powers could be enforced).
Izraz „namen (...) ni odstopati“ (člen 13 sporazuma) ne ustreza nobeni določbi Pogodbe ali pravnemu terminu EU, njegov pomen pa je – iskreno – nejasen.
The expression "intended not to derogate" (article 13, FMDA) does not correspond to any Treaty provision or term of art in EU law, and its meaning is frankly obscure .
Medinstitucionalni odnosi
Inter-institutional relations