natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kot taka bi potrebna nova sredstva znašala 8,86 milijona EUR za celotno obdobje, kar ni prekomerno, če upoštevamo sedanje ocene Komisije, da znaša skupna rezerva za razdelek 3A za to obdobje kakih 176 milijonov EUR.
As such, the new funding really required would amount to EUR 8.86 million for the whole period, which does not seem excessive if one considers that for the time being the Commission estimates that overall margin for heading 3A for that period reaches some EUR 176 millions.
Zato se zdi, da je predlog skladen s sedanjim finančnim okvirom, čeprav Komisija še ni predvidela Evropskega urada za podporo azilu v sedanjem dokumentu o finančnem načrtovanju, ki je bil Evropskemu parlamentu predstavljen januarja 2009.
Thus, the proposal seems compatible with the current financial framework even though the Commission has not yet foreseen the EASO in the current Financial Programming document presented to the European Parliament in January 2009.
Poročevalka bi rada tudi opozorila, da ustanovitev decentraliziranih agencij pomeni način uporabe operativnih skladov za pokritje upravnih odhodkov.
The rapporteur would further recall that the creation of decentralised agencies amounts to a way of using operational funds to cover administrative expenses.
Treba je rešiti vprašanje financiranja dela odhodkov agencij prek razdelka 5.
The issue of financing a part of the expenditure of the agencies via Heading 5 should be tackled.
V prid temu govori omejena razlika do zgornje meje iz razdelka 3a , saj drugih prednostnih nalog Evropskega parlamenta morda ne bo mogoče financirati.
The limited margin available in heading 3a reinforces the argument for doing so as other priorities by the European Parliament might not be able to be financed.
Poročevalka upa, da bo medinstitucionalna delovna skupina o regulativnih agencijah omogočila nadaljnje razprave na tem področju.
The rapporteur hopes that the inter-institutional working group on regulatory agencies will allow for some further discussion in this area.
Poročevalka meni, da je ocena učinka, ki jo je zagotovila Komisija, precej pomanjkljiva.
The rapporteur considers that the Impact Assessment (IA) provided by the Commission is substantially flawed.
Pravzaprav je analiza med drugimi slabostmi pokazala, da je bila „politična izvedljivost“ odločilno merilo za sklep o tem, da je najboljša izbira „decentralizirana agencija“.
In fact its analysis shows, amongst other weaknesses, that the decisive criteria leading to the conclusion that the option for a "decentralised agency", was the best one was its "political feasibility".
Opiranje sklepov na taka merila seže celo do zatrjevanja, da je bolje ustanoviti agencijo, saj to želi zakonodajalec...
To rest the conclusion on such criteria amounts to saying that "it is better to create an agency because the legislator wants to create an agency"...
Brez poseganja v politično diskrecijo zakonodajnega organa, ki kot zadnji politično odloča, ni sprejemljivo, da temelji ocena učinka na tej domnevi.
Without prejudice for the political discretion of the legislative authority, to which the political decision is finally committed, it is not acceptable that an IA rests on such an assumption.
Člen 5 medinstitucionalnega skupnega pristopa k oceni učinka določa, naj bi ocena učinka zagotovila tehnične in analitične podatke kot podlago za politično odločitev, ne pa predvidevala, kakšna je politična volja odločujočih, da bi upravičili njihove odločitve.
As article 5 of the interinstitutional common approach to the IA states "an IA is supposed to provide technical and analytical data as a basis for the political decision, not to anticipate the political will of the deciders to justify their decision".
Ni prvič, da Komisija predstavlja nedosledne ocene učinke ter analize stroškov in koristi.
This is not the first time the Commission presents an inconsistent IA or cost-benefit- analysis (CBA).
Poročevalka meni, da bi moral Evropski parlament preučiti možnost, da bi Komisija v bodoče poslala svojo oceno učinka/analizo stroškov in koristi v zvezi z ustanovitvijo nove agencije Računskemu sodišču, da bo to lahko predstavilo mnenje o skladnosti z oceno učinka, s čimer bi preprečili take razmere.
The rapporteur considers that the EP should analyse the possibility that, in future, the Commission should send its IA/CBA concerning the creation of a new agency to the Court of Auditors, so that they may give an opinion on the consistency of the impact assessments in order to avoid this kind of situation.
Poročevalka bi rada tudi poudarila, da zaradi političnih pritiskov Evropskega parlamenta predlog Komisije vključuje poseben člen, ki določa, da so ureditev za nastanitev urada, oprema, ki se da na voljo, ter pravila, ki se v državi gostiteljici urada uporabljajo za upravljanje ter osebje urada in njihove družinske člane, opredeljeni v sporazumu o sedežu med uradom in državo članico gostiteljico.
The rapporteur would also like to stress that, as a result of the political pressures of the EP, the Commission proposal includes a specific article stating that arrangements for accommodation of the Office, the facilities to be made available and the rules applicable to the management and staff of the Office, as well as their families, shall be laid down in a headquarters agreement between the host state and the Office.
Poudariti je treba, da mora država članica gostiteljica zagotoviti najboljše možne razmere, da zagotovi dobro delovanje urada, vključno s prevozom in šolanjem.
It should be stressed that the host Member State must provide the best conditions possible to ensure the good functioning of the Office, including transport and schooling.
2a. meni, da je ocena učinka, ki jo je predstavila Komisija, da bi upravičila svoj predlog, zelo nedosledna; poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda oceno učinka pred zaključkom zakonodajnega postopka; namerava preučiti možnost, da bi se v bodoče ocene učinka v zvezi z ustanovitvijo novih agencij pošiljale Računskemu sodišču, ki bi podalo svoje mnenje pred predstavitvijo zakonodajnih predlogov;
Considers that the impact assessment presented by the Commission to justify its proposal is seriously inconsistent; asks the Commission to revise its impact assessment before the conclusion of the legislative procedure; intends to look into the possibility that, in future, impact assessments concerning the creation of new agencies be sent to the Court of Auditors, which should deliver an opinion on its consistency prior to the presentation of the legislative proposal;
Odstavek 2 b (novo)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. poudarja, da bodo za ustanovitev evropskega urada za podporo prosilcem za azil veljale določbe iz točke 47 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006; poudarja, da bo Parlament, če se bo zakonodajni organ odločil, da bo to agencijo ustanovil, začel pogajanja z drugo vejo proračunskega organa, da bi se pravočasno sklenil sporazum o financiranju te agencije v skladu z ustreznimi določbami medinstitucionalnega sporazuma;
Stresses that the provisions of Point 47 of the IIA of 17 May 2006 will apply for the setting-up of the European Asylum Support Office; stresses that, should the legislative authority decide in favour of the setting-up of such an agency, Parliament will enter into negotiations with the other arm of the budgetary authority with a view to coming to a timely agreement on the financing of this agency in line with the relevant provisions of the IIA;
Za financiranje urada velja sporazum proračunskega organa, kot je določeno v točki 47 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju 1 .
The financing of the Office is subject to an agreement by the budgetary authority as set out in Point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management 1 .
(18a) Za urad se uporablja Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1650/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti 1 (finančna uredba), zlasti njen člen 185.
(18a) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities 1 (Financial Regulation), and in particular Article 185 thereof should apply to the Office,
1 UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
1 OJ L 248,16.9.2002, p.
Člen 40 – odstavek 1
Article 40 - paragraph 1
Urad začne delovati najpozneje eno leto po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
The Office shall become operational within one year of the entry into force of this Regulation.
Urad začne delovati najpozneje eno leto po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe , če se države članice sporazumejo o njegovem sedežu dovolj zgodaj, da je na tem sedežu osnovna infrastruktura pripravljena za delovanje .
The Office shall become operational within one year of the entry into force of this Regulation , provided that the Member States have agreed on its seat sufficiently in advance to allow its basic infrastructure to become operational at that seat .
Namen dodanega besedila je preprečiti razmere, do katerih je prišlo pri Evropski agenciji za pomorsko varnost, katere začasni sedež je bil drugje kot dokončni in kasnejša selitev povzroča znatne dodatne stroške.
This addition is intended to prevent situations - like it happened with EMSA - in which an agency is provisionally established in one place different from the one of its definitive seat and has to face additional substantial costs for its later transfer.
Člen 45 – odstavek 1
Article 45 - paragraph 1
Urad najpozneje v treh letih po datumu iz člena 51 naroči neodvisno zunanjo oceno dosežkov urada na podlagi pooblastil, ki jih pripravi upravni odbor v dogovoru s Komisijo.
No later than three years after the date referred to in Article 51, the Office shall commission an independent external evaluation of its achievements on the basis of terms of reference issued by the Management Board in agreement with the Commission.
V oceni je proučen vpliv urada na sodelovanje v praksi na področju azila in na skupni evropski azilni sistem.
This evaluation will cover the Office's impact on practical cooperation on asylum and on the Common European Asylum System.
V njej se obravnava zlasti morebitna potreba po spremembi ali razširitvi nalog urada, vključno s finančnimi posledicami takšne spremembe ali razširitve .
It shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify or extend the tasks of the Office, including the financial implications of any such modification or extension .
V oceni se prouči tudi ustreznost upravljavske strukture glede na izvajanje nalog urada.
This evaluation shall also look at whether the management structure is appropriate for carrying out the Office's tasks.
Pri oceni se upošteva mnenje zainteresiranih strani na ravni Skupnosti in nacionalni ravni.
The evaluation will take into account the views of stakeholders, at both Community and national levels.
V njej se obravnava zlasti morebitna potreba po spremembi ali razširitvi nalog urada ali prenehanje njegovih dejavnosti, če postane njegova vloga pri izvajanju skupne azilne politike nepotrebna , vključno s finančnimi posledicami teh dejavnosti .
It shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify or extend the tasks of the Office or to close down its activities in the event that its role in the implementation of the common asylum policy has become superfluous, including the financial implications of any of these actions .
Treba je upoštevati tudi možnost ukinitve urada, kot velja za vse agencije.
The possibility of closing down the Office, as in the case of all agencies, should also be considered.
Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Michael Gahler, Marusja Ivanova Ljubčeva, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Paul Rübig, Peter Šťastný
Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Michael Gahler, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Paul Rübig, Peter Šťastný
Emine Bozkurt, Mihael Brejc, Michael Cashman, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Armando França, Kinga Gál, Roland Gewalt, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Vladimir Uručev
Emine Bozkurt, Mihael Brejc, Michael Cashman, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Armando França, Kinga Gál, Roland Gewalt, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Vladimir Urutchev
o predlogu Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Odločbe št. 573/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 glede ukinitve financiranja nekaterih ukrepov Skupnosti ter spremembe omejitve njihovega financiranja
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 by removing funding for certain Community actions and altering the limit for funding such actions
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0067 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0067 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 63(2)(b) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6‑0070/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 63(2)(b) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0070/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6‑0280/2009 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0280/2009 ),
Cilj tega predloga je prilagoditev odločbe o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje od 2008 do 2013
The objective of the current proposal is to amend the Decision establishing the European Refugee Fund (ERF) for the period 2008 to 2013
Člen 4(2)(a) Odločbe 573/2007/ES. in „[podpiranje razvoja in uporabe] skupnih statističnih orodij, metod ter kazalcev za merjenje razvoja na področju azilne politike s strani držav članic“
Article 4(2)(a) Decision 573/2007/EC. and " supporting the development and application by Member States of common statistical tools, methods and indicators for measuring policy developments in the field of asylum"
Člen 4(2)(f) Odločbe 573/2007/ES. .
Article 4(2)(f) Decision 573/2007/EC. .
Ob upoštevanju potrebe po izboljšanju dejavnosti sodelovanja v praksi, ki so povezane s skupnim evropskim azilnim sistemom, je bila zamisel o vzpostavitvi strukture, namenjene podpori in usklajevanju takšnih dejavnosti, omenjena ob različnih priložnostih in na različnih forumih: sklepi predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Bruslju (4. in 5. novembra 2004)
Taking into account the need of enhancing practical cooperation activities linked to the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), the idea of establishing a structure destined to support and coordinate such activities has been raised on several occasions and fora: Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council (4/5 November 2004),
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij: Načrt politike azila – celostni pristop k zaščiti v EU ( KOM(2008)0360 ). in Evropski pakt o priseljevanju in azilu s 24. septembra 2008
Communication from the Commission to the EP, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: Policy Plan on asylum, An integrated approach to protection across the EU - COM(2008)0360 . the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum of 24 September 2008.
Evropski parlament je podprl tudi to pobudo
The European Parliament has also expressed its support for this initiative
Poročilo poslanca Giusta Catanie o prihodnosti skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, P6_TA-PROV(2009)0087 , odstavek 23; poročilo poslanke Jean Lambert o oceni dublinskega sistema, P6_TA-PROV(2008)0385 , odstavek 3; poročilo Huberta Pirkerja o sodelovanju v praksi in kakovosti odločanja na področju skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, P6_TA(2007)0286 , odstavek 15; poročilo poslanke Barbare Kudrycke o zakonodajni resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Odločbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“, P6_TA(2006)0581 , odstavek 9. , ki bi lahko odpravila nekatere pomanjkljivosti sedanjega sistema.
Catania Report on the future of the European Common Asylum System, P6_TA-PROV(2009)0087 , para.23; Lambert Report on the Evaluation of the Dublin System, P6_TA-PROV(2008)0385 , para.3; Pirker Report on practical cooperation, quality of decision-making in the common European asylum system, P6_TA(2007)0286 , para.15; Kudrycka Report -European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008-2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ P6_TA(2006)0581 , para.9. which could alleviate some of the current shortcomings of the system.
Kot omenjeno, bo Evropskemu uradu za podporo azilu zaupan niz nalog, ki so zaenkrat še del ukrepov Skupnosti, vendar bodo umeščene v okvir Evropskega sklada za begunce.
As mentioned above the European Asylum Support Office will be entrusted with a series of tasks currently included under the Community actions to be deployed under the heading of the ERF.
V ta namen je treba spremeniti Evropski sklad za begunce.
This requires consequently the amendment of the ERF.
Zato bo ob upoštevanju zmanjšanja [...] obsega ukrepanja omejitev financiranja ukrepov Skupnosti iz 10 % razpoložljivih sredstev Sklada, predvidenih v členu 4(1) odločbe o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce, zmanjšana na 4 %, kakor je navedla Komisija v obrazložitvenem memorandumu k predlogu.
Therefore, as the Commission has indicated in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the proposal, in order to take account of the reduction in the scope of these Community actions, the limit for funding them, laid down in Article 4(1) of the ERF Decision, will be reduced from 10% of the Fund's available resources to 4%.
Prav tako se bodo zmanjšala finančna sredstva za izvajanje odločbe o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce, da se tako sprostijo sredstva za financiranje urada.
The financial envelope for implementing the ERF Decision has also been reduced to free up resources towards the funding of the Office.
Znesek iz člena 12(1) odločbe o ustanovitvi Evropskega urada za begunce v višini 628 milijonov EUR bo zmanjšan na 614 milijonov EUR (v novem znesku bosta upoštevana povečanje za 10 milijonov EUR, ki ga je proračunski organ sprejel v okviru proračuna za leto 2009, in zmanjšanje za 24 milijonov EUR za zmanjšanje obsega ukrepov Skupnosti).
The amount of EUR 628 million, referred to in Article 12(1) of the ERF Decision, will be reduced to EUR 614 million (the new amount taking into account both the EUR 10 million increase decided by the budgetary authority in the 2009 budget and the EUR 24 million cut resulting from the reduction in the scope of the Community actions).
Poročevalka podpira to stališče, katerega cilj je zagotoviti tako smotrno in razumno dodeljevanje proračunskih sredstev kot tudi najugodnejše financiranje sodelovanja v praksi na področju azila.
Your rapporteur supports this position which aims to ensure also a sound and rational allocation of budgetary resources and an optimal financing of practical cooperation on asylum matters.
Cilj obravnavanega predloga je sprememba odločbe o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013
The objective of the proposal under consideration is to amend the Decision establishing the European Refugee Fund (ERF) for the period 2008 to 2013
Odločba št. 573/2007/ES o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 v okviru splošnega programa Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov in razveljavitvi Odločbe Sveta 2004/904/ES (UL L 144, 6.6.2007, str.
Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows and repealing Council Decision 2004/904/EC (OJ L 144, 6.6.2007, p.
1). zaradi ustanovitve Evropskega urada za podporo azilu, katerega naloga bodo tudi nekateri ukrepi, ki so se doslej financirali iz Evropskega sklada za begunce.
1). , with a view to the creation of the European Asylum Support Office, which will have amongst its tasks a number of operations that have, until now, been financed through the ERF
Zaradi manjšega obsega ukrepov Skupnosti, ki se financirajo iz Evropskega sklada za begunce, Komisija predlaga, da se financiranje teh ukrepov omeji z 10 % na 4 % sredstev, ki so na voljo Evropskemu skladu za begunce.
As a consequence of the reduction of the scope of the Community actions funded by the ERF, the Commission proposes to limit the funding of those Community actions from 10% to 4% of the Funds available for the ERF.
Posledica zmanjšanja skupnih finančnih sredstev Evropskega sklada za begunce je ta, da je od prvotno predvidenih 628 milijonov EUR dejansko razpoložljivih 614 milijonov EUR, kar pomeni zmanjšanje za 24 milijonov EUR, če upoštevamo povečanje za 10 milijonov EUR, ki ga je proračunski organ sprejel v okviru proračuna za leto 2009.
The effect of these reductions in the overall financial envelope of the ERF is its reduction from EUR 628 million, as originally foreseen, to EUR 614 million, which means a reduction of EUR 24 millions if one takes into consideration the increase of EUR 10 million that had been decided by the budgetary authority in the 2009 budget.
24 milijonov EUR, ki bodo na voljo po spremembi odločbe o Evropskem skladu za begunce, bo po navedbah Komisije porabljenih za financiranje nekaterih dejavnosti Evropskega urada za podporo azilu in kot dodatna sredstva, namenjena temu uradu.
The EUR 24 million made available by this modification of the ERF Decision will, according to the Commission, be used to finance a part of the activities of the EASO and to supplement the funds which will be allocated to the office.
Komisija pa tega še ni upoštevala v finančnem načrtu, čeprav je to omenjeno že v finančnem poročilu k osnutku uredbe o ustanovitvi Evropskega urada za podporo azilu.
However, although this is also mentioned in the financial statement accompanying the draft regulation on the establishment of EASO, the Commission has not yet taken it into consideration in the financial programming.
Pripravljavec mnenja pričakuje, da bodo v finančnem načrtu, ki je priložen predhodnemu predlogu proračuna, že v celoti razvidne spremembe, ki izhajajo iz tega predloga, ter sprememba glede ustanovitve Evropskega urada za podporo azilu.
The rapporteur expects that the financial programming accompanying the preliminary draft budget will already give a full picture of the modifications resulting from this proposal and the one concerning the creation of EASO.
Pripravljavec mnenja, ki se strinja z ustanovitvijo Evropskega urada za podporo azilu, v zvezi s tem meni, da predlog s finančnega vidika ne prinaša negativnih posledic (načeloma nima posebnega učinka na finančno načrtovanje, saj bodo zagotovljeni zneski uporabljeni v drugi vrstici v razdelku 3a), in priporoča, naj Odbor za proračun poda pozitivno mnenje.
In this context, the rapporteur, who agrees with the creation of the EASO, considers that the proposal has no negative consequences in financial terms (its significance in terms of financial programming seems to be neutral, as the sums made available will be used in another line under Heading 3a), and recommends that the Committee on Budgets deliver a favourable opinion.