natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
F. ker je imel do sedaj v povezavi z upravljanjem interneta zasebni sektor prevladujočo in pozitivno vodilno vlogo, je pa treba pri opredelitvi globalne strategije okrepiti vlogo javnih organizacij,
F. whereas, in connection with internet governance, the private sector has so far had a prevailing and positive guiding role; whereas, however, the role of public bodies should be strengthened when defining overall strategy,
G. ker imajo vlade pomembno vlogo pri širših upravnih vidikih varovanja javnega interesa, zlasti v zvezi z varovanjem in zagotavljanjem temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, pa tudi zagotavljanjem varnosti, integritete in odpornosti interneta, čeprav izredno pomembno vlogo nosi zasebni sektor, ki zagotavlja potrebne naložbe, strokovno znanje in podjetniške pobude;
G. whereas governments have an important role regarding broader governance aspects in defence of the public interest, in particular to protect and guarantee fundamental rights and freedoms, as well as regarding the security, integrity and resilience of the internet, while the private sector assumes a crucial role in providing the necessary investment, expertise and entrepreneurial initiative,
H. ker so svetovni forum o upravljanju interneta ter različni nacionalni in regionalni forumi pomembna prizorišča za večstranski dialog zainteresiranih strani o internetni politiki;
H. whereas the global Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and various national and regional fora are important arenas for multi-stakeholder internet policy dialogue,
I. ker Evropski parlament in druge evropske institucije izkazujejo dolgotrajno zavezanost internetu kot odprti svetovni javni dobrini,
I. whereas the European Parliament and the other European institutions have a long-standing commitment to the internet as an open global public good,
4. poudarja predvsem potrebo po okrepitvi pristopa od spodaj navzgor in e-demokracije ter sočasnem zagotavljanju znatnih zaščitnih ukrepov za preprečitev novih oblik nadzora, kontrole in cenzure s strani javnih ali privatnih akterjev, tako da bosta prosti dostop do interneta in varovanje zasebnega življenja resnična in ne navidezna;
Underlines especially the need to enhance the evolution of ‘bottom-up’ approaches and of e-democracy, while simultaneously ensuring that significant safeguards are established against new forms of surveillance, control and censorship by public or private actors, so that the freedom of internet access and the protection of private life are real and not illusory;
6. priznava, da vse pogostejša uporaba interneta med državljani, potrošniki, podjetji in upravnimi organi pomeni, da je to komunikacijsko orodje postalo eden temeljnih elementov za uresničitev notranjega trga v EU; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je potrebno ustrezno varstvo potrošnikov in imetnikov pravic intelektualne lastnine pri uporabi interneta; prav tako poudarja, da morajo biti zagotovljene državljanske pravice in svoboščine uporabnikov interneta; priznava pomen interneta kot sredstva za obveščanje in spodbujanje pravic potrošnikov;
Recognises that the intensified use of the internet by citizens, consumers, companies and authorities implies that this communication instrument is becoming one of the fundamental elements of the completion of the internal market within the EU; stresses in this context the need for appropriate protection of consumers and intellectual property rights holders on the internet; also stresses that internet users’ civil rights and freedoms must be guaranteed; recognises the importance of the internet as a way of providing information on and promoting consumers’ rights;
8. poziva k lažjemu dostopu in razvoju interneta v novejših državah članicah, zlasti na podeželskih območjih, in v državah v razvoju prek programov, ki jih financira Evropska unija; poziva tudi, da se tem državam omogoči večji vpliv pri oblikovanju upravljanja interneta;
Calls for easier access to and development of the internet in newer Member States, particularly in rural areas, and in developing countries, through programmes funded by the European Union; further calls for these countries to be granted greater influence in shaping internet governance policy;
11. meni, da bi se morale vlade osredotočiti na vprašanja, ki so ključna za globalno javno internetno politiko, saj mora vodenje zasebnega sektorja temeljiti na spoštovanju načel javne politike in veljavne zakonodaje, ter da bi se morale držati načela nevmešavanja, razen kadar je to potrebno v izjemnih okoliščinah, pa še takrat bi moralo njihovo ukrepanje spoštovati temeljne človekove pravice in načelo sorazmernosti;
Considers that governments should focus on issues vital to global internet public policy as private sector leadership needs to be based on respect for public policy principles and existing legislation and otherwise adhere to a principle of non-intervention, except as may be necessary in exceptional circumstances, and that even then their action should respect fundamental human rights and the proportionality principle;
UL L 337, 18.12.2009, str.
OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p.
15. poziva k številnejšim pobudam, s katerimi bi otrokom omogočili varno raziskovanje interneta, po vsem svetu razširili najboljše prakse in okrepili mednarodno sodelovanje v boju proti škodljivim in nezakonitim vsebinam na spletu, zlasti v zvezi s spolnim zlorabljanjem otrok na internetu;
Calls for more initiatives to strengthen the safe exploration of the internet by children, to disseminate best practices worldwide, and to reinforce international cooperation in the fight against harmful and illegal content online, particularly with regard to the sexual abuse of children on the internet;
(i) preglednost, večstranskost, demokracija in varovanje temeljnih pravic in svoboščin v skladu s standardi EU;
(i) transparency, multilateralism, democracy and protection of fundamental rights and freedoms meeting EU standards;
(ii) spoštovanje odprtega, interoperabilnega, tehnološko nevtralnega in povezljivega značaja internetne infrastrukture;
(ii) respect for an open, interoperable, technologically neutral and ‘end-to-end’ nature of internet infrastructure,
(iii) javna odgovornost zasebnikov navzven pri vsakodnevnem upravljanju svetovnih internetnih virov;
(iii) external public accountability of private-sector entities managing global internet resources on a day-to-day basis,
(iv) spodbujanje globalnega upravljanja interneta z nadaljnjim spodbujanjem postopkov z vsestransko udeležbo zainteresiranih strani in interakcijo med njimi, pri čemer je treba obravnavati tudi potrebo po okrepljeni udeležbi držav v razvoju;
(iv) promotion of global internet governance through interaction with and further encouragement of multi-stakeholder processes, also addressing the need to improve the participation of developing countries;
(v) zaščita nedeljivosti svetovnega interneta in svobode komuniciranja tako, da se ne sprejemajo nobeni regionalni ukrepi, kot je preklic naslovov IP ali domenskih imen v tretjih državah;
(v) protection of the integrity of the global internet and freedom of communication by avoiding any regional measures, such as revocation of IP addresses or domain names in third countries;
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0133 . glede priprave evropske listine državljanskih in potrošniških pravic v digitalnem okolju in razvitja „pete svoboščine“, ki bo omogočala prost pretok vsebin in znanja;
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0133 . on drawing up a European Charter of Citizens’ and consumers’ rights in the digital environment and developing a ‘Fifth Freedom’ that enables the free circulation of content and knowledge;
(i) zaščito internetne infrastrukture za zagotovitev odprtosti, razpoložljivosti, varnosti in odpornosti na kibernetske napade,
(i) protection of internet infrastructure to safeguard openness, availability, security and resilience against cyber attacks,
(ii) evropsko odvisnost od prevladujočih tržnih rešitev in s tem povezanim ogrožanjem javne varnosti ter
(ii) European dependencies on dominant market solutions and associated public security risks, and
(iii) varstvo podatkov in zasebnosti, zlasti kar zadeva vzpostavitev učinkovitih mednarodnih mehanizmov za reševanje sporov; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predlog za prilagoditev direktive o varstvu podatkov današnjemu digitalnemu okolju;
(iii) protection of data and privacy, in particular as regards the establishment of effective international mechanisms for dispute resolution; calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for the adaptation of the Data Protection Directive to the current digital environment;
24. poudarja pomen varnosti elektronskih storitev, zlasti elektronskih podpisov in potrebe po infrastrukturi javnih ključev na vseevropski ravni, ter Komisijo poziva, naj vzpostavi evropski portal organov za potrjevanje, s katerim bo zagotovila čezmejno interoperabilnost elektronskih podpisov in povečala varnost transakcij, opravljenih z uporabo interneta;
Stresses the importance of the security of electronic services, especially of electronic signatures, and of the need for the creation of the Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) at Pan-European level, and calls on the Commission to set up a European Validation Authorities Gateway in order to ensure the cross-border interoperability of electronic signatures and to increase the security of transactions carried out using the internet;
27. priporoča tudi, naj si Komisija in države članice z ukrepi za večjo raznolikost omrežja in sistemov prizadevajo za okrepljeno varnost in stabilnost interneta, za to pa uveljavljajo konkurenčno pravo, standarde EU in politiko javnih naročil, pa tudi:
Recommends in addition that the Commission and Member States work towards enhanced security and stability of the internet through measures aimed at increasing network and system diversity through the application of competition law, EU standards and procurement policy, as well as by:
(i) podprejo delo organizacije ICANN v zvezi z varnostjo in stabilnostjo na področju sistema domenskih imen,
(i) supporting ICANN’s work on security and stability of the domain name system,
(ii) podprejo delo v mednarodnih forumih, kot so Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj, OZN in Svet Evrope, za boljše zakonodajne okvire in nacionalno usklajevanje;
(ii) supporting work in international fora such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations and the Council of Europe on improved legislative frameworks and national coordination;
40. , tako da bodo vanjo vključene kršitve varstva podatkov in zasebnosti; poziva Svet, naj odobri pogajanja za sklenitev mednarodnega sporazuma, ki bo državljanom EU zagotovil pravna sredstva v primeru kršitve njihovih pravic do varstva podatkov in zasebnosti v okviru zakonodaje EU;
40 to include violations of data protection and privacy, and on the Council to authorise negotiations with a view to concluding an international agreement enabling effective redress by EU individuals in case of violations of their rights under EU law to data protection and privacy;
– določanju raziskovalnih prioritet na evropski ravni na področju omrežne odpornosti, varnosti omrežja in informacij ter pri sporočanju industrijskih potreb potencialnim raziskovalnim ustanovam;
- identifying the research priorities, on a European level, in the areas of networking resilience and in network and information security, and offering knowledge of industry needs to potential research institutions;
– opozarjanju nosilcev odločanja na nove tehnologije na področju varnosti;
- drawing the attention of decision-makers to new technologies in security-related areas;
– vzpostavljanju forumov za izmenjavo informacij in zagotavljanju podpore državam članicam;
- developing forums for information-sharing and provide support to Member States;
39. meni, da mora imeti Komisija osrednjo vlogo pri začetku in usklajevanju vseh vidikov v zvezi z notranjo organizacijo EU za zagotovitev skladnega pristopa EU, vključno v zvezi z IGF;
Considers that the Commission has a central role to play in initiating and coordinating all aspects relating to the internal EU organisation to ensure a coherent EU approach, including with respect to the IGF;
41. odločno poziva Komisijo, naj olajša sprejetje skladnega in skupnega pristopa EU do IGF in drugih večjih dogajanj v zvezi z upravljanjem interneta, tako da predloži osnutek dokumenta o stališču EU Parlamentu in Svetu v razpravo precej pred vsakim takšnim dogodkom;
Requests the Commission to facilitate the adoption of a coherent and comprehensive EU approach at IGF and other major internet governance events by submitting a draft EU position document well in advance of each such event to the European Parliament and Council for debate;
(i) z udeležbo držav v razvoju, zlasti s financiranjem njihove udeležbe,
(i) increased participation of developing countries, with attention paid to funding of their participation,
(ii) s prepoznavnostjo v medijih,
(ii) heightened visibility in the media,
(iii) z učinkovitejšo organizacijo srečanj foruma (zmanjšanje števila sočasnih srečanj, vzpostavitev trdnega okvira, ki bo olajšal udeležbo z vsega sveta in okrepil večjezičnost),
(iii) more efficient organisation of meetings, e.g. by a reduction in the number of simultaneous meetings, the establishment of a stable platform to facilitate global participation, and greater multilingualism,
(iv) z boljšo usklajenostjo in sodelovanjem med svetovnim, regionalnim in nacionalnim upravljanjem interneta ter
(iv) better coordination and cooperation between global, regional and national internet governance fora, and
46. podpira delo Komisije in španskega ter belgijskega predsedstva v zvezi s srečanjem IGF v Vilni septembra 2010 in poziva k večji udeležbi Evropskega parlametna;
Supports the work of the Commission and the Spanish and Belgian Presidencies as regards the Vilnius IGF meeting in September 2010, and calls for an increased participation of the European Parliament;
52. poziva .eu registrar EURid, naj izvede temeljito medijsko in spletno kampanjo za promocijo domene .eu po vseh državah članicah, da bi se lažje razvilo evropsko spletno okolje, ki bo temeljilo na vrednotah, značilnostih in politikah Evropske unije;
Calls on the .eu registrar EURid to conduct a thorough media and on-line campaign to promote the .eu domain across the Member States to facilitate the development of a European on-line environment based on the values, characteristics and policies of the European Union;
(i) pri oceni učinkovitosti obstoječih mehanizmov za reševanje sporov (neodvisni strokovni odbor in ombudsman ICANN), vpeljavo alternativnega zunanjega mehanizma razreševanja sporov, ki bo zainteresiranim strankam omogočil učinkovit, nevtralen, pravočasen in dostopen pregled odločitev organizacije ICANN,
(i) the introduction - while reviewing the performance of existing dispute resolution mechanisms (Independent Review Panel and ICANN Ombudsman) - of an alternative, external dispute resolution mechanism allowing interested parties effective, neutral, timely and affordable review of ICANN decisions,
(ii) s postopnim uvajanjem strukture razpršenega financiranja, pri katerem bo določena zgornja meja za vsako posamezno enoto in sektor, da bi preprečili pretiran vpliv na delovanje organizacije ICANN, ki bi ga lahko imeli posamezni subjekti ali skupine subjektov;
(ii) a gradually implemented diversified funding structure, with funding from any one entity or sector capped, in order to prevent undue influence over ICANN’s activities by any individual entity or group of entities;
(iii) z ustreznim zastopstvom vseh zainteresiranih strank v organizaciji ICANN,
(iii) appropriate representation of all interested parties in ICANN,
(iv) z zagotovitvijo, da bosta upravni odbor in najvišje vodstvo organizacije ICANN zastopala širok razpon interesov in regij;
(iv) ensuring that ICANN’s board and top management represent a range of interests and regions;
(v) z uporabo razumnega dela njegovih rezervnih sredstev za spodbujeno sodelovanje civilne družbe (zlasti iz držav v razvoju) v forumih o upravljanju interneta;
(v) use of a reasonable part of its reserve fund in order to boost civil society’s participation to internet governance fora (especially from developing countries);
56. meni, da lahko izjava o zavezanosti iz 2009 predstavlja pozitivno izhodišče za nadaljnji razvoj organizacije ICANN, pri tem pa poudarja, da:
Considers that the 2009 ‘affirmation of commitments’ can constitute a positive basis for further development of ICANN, while emphasising that:
(i) mora EU, predvsem preko Komisije, prevzeti dejavno vlogo pri izvajanju, med drugim preko odborov za pregled in z zagotavljanjem, da so člani odborov neodvisni, niso v navzkrižju interesov in zastopajo različne regije,
(i) the EU, primarily through the Commission, should play an active part in implementation, including through the review panels and by ensuring that the members of those panels are independent, have no conflicts of interest and represent different regions,
(ii) mora organizacija ICANN po pripombah javnosti uresničiti priporočila odborov za pregled in navesti vzroke v primeru, da jih ne izvede;
(ii) following public comment, recommendations by the review panels should be implemented by ICANN and reasons given in the event that it does not do so;
Stališče Komisije iz njenega sporočila iz junija 2009 je mogoče povzeti v naslednjih točkah:
The Commission’s position as set out in its communication of June 2009 can be summed up as follows:
a) jasno zavzemanje za „vodilno vlogo zasebnega sektorja“, kot se je izrazila Komisija;
a) a clear preference for what is clearly described as ‘private-sector leadership’;
b) pomisleki glede nereprezentativne strukture organizacije za dodeljevanje spletnih imen in številk ICANN;
b) worries about ICANN’s unrepresentative structure;
c) zaskrbljenost zaradi nezadostnega nadzora mednarodne skupnosti, med drugim EU, nad delovanjem ICANN.
c) obvious concern that the international community, including the EU, has very little control over the running of ICANN.
Komisija predlaga notranjo reformo organizacije ICANN, ki bi privedla do „polne odgovornosti in preglednosti“; hkrati pa meni, da je potrebna nadomestitev „sedanje ureditve enostranskega nadzora nad ICANN in IANA [...] z alternativnim mehanizmom, ki bi zagotavljal večstransko odgovornost ICANN“.
The Commission proposes an internal reform of ICANN (‘Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers’) that would lead to ‘full accountability and transparency’ on the one hand, while stating that ‘the current arrangements for unilateral oversight in regard to ICANN and IANA need to be replaced with an alternative mechanism to ensure that ICANN has multilateral accountability’ on the other.
Na kratko velja omeniti, da je organizacija ICANN nepridobitna organizacija, za katero velja kalifornijsko pravo, kar nenehno povzroča pravne zaplete.
It is worth briefly restating that ICANN is a non-profit organisation subject to Californian law, a situation which causes constant legal problems.
Organizacija ICANN opredeljuje internet kot mednarodno omrežje omrežij, ki ne pripada nobeni določeni državi, posamezniku ali organizaciji in kot tako služi interesom vsega sveta, ne glede na meje med državami.
The internet is defined by ICANN as an ‘international network of networks, owned by no single nation, individual or organisation’ which therefore undertakes to serve global public interests, with no regard to the borders between governments.
Neizogibno je, da tako nenavadna organizacija, namenjena upravljanju novega in zapletenega sveta, sproža polemike med vpletenimi stranmi, ki so v tem primeru razpršene po celotni svetovni skupnosti.
It is inevitable that such an unusual entity, managing a new and complex world, will create controversy among the parties involved, said parties being, in this particular case, spread across the whole of the global community concerned.
Mnenja o organizaciji ICANN in njeni vlogi so deljena: obstajajo tako njeni zagovorniki kot nasprotniki.
Opinions about ICANN and its role can be found covering both sides of the argument: its defenders and its detractors.
Med slednjimi se nekateri zavzemajo za to, da bi bilo treba njene naloge prenesti na mednarodno organizacijo, ustanovljeno posebej za to priložnost ali ki že obstaja pod okriljem Združenih narodov.
Among the latter are voices claiming that its duties should be transferred to an international organisation, either one created specifically for this purpose or one under the umbrella of the United Nations.
Ta predlog je dobro utemeljen, zlasti če izhajamo iz stališča, da je sistem domen „javna dobrina“, to pa je koncept, ki je v mednarodnem pravu dobro znan: pomeni sredstvo, ki ni predmet nacionalne suverenosti in ga uporablja mednarodna skupnost, ki ima zanj poseben interes.
This proposal is solidly founded, especially when starting from the viewpoint that the ‘domain name system’ is ‘public property’ – a well known concept in international law meaning a resource that is not subject to national sovereignty and is used by the international community that has an exceptional degree of interest in it.
Na svetovnih vrhunskih srečanjih o informacijski družbi v Ženevi in Tunisu (leta 2003 in 2005) je bilo poudarjeno, da je treba za upravljanje domen poiskati bolj nepristransko mednarodno organizacijo, kot je ICANN, načeto pa je bilo tudi vprašanje popolne privatizacije organizacije ICANN.
At the Geneva and Tunis World Summits on The Information Society (WSIS, 2003 and 2005) the need to find an international organisation to manage domains that is more neutral than ICANN was stressed while the idea of privatising ICANN completely was also raised.
Razen teh izjav se države niso sporazumele o tem, kako spremeniti sedanji sistem.
Beyond those declarations, governments have not reached any consensual agreement on replacing the existing system.
Da bi se posvetovanje lahko nadaljevalo, je bil v okviru vrhunskega srečanja o informacijski družbi ustanovljen forum o upravljanju interneta, ki se je izkazal kot odlično središče za razprave.
Deliberations have continued in the ‘Internet Governance Forum’ set up by WISS and this forum has proved to be a fantastic centre for discussion and debate.
Na zadnjem srečanju v Šarm El Šejku v Egiptu je bilo sklenjeno, da se mandat foruma podaljša, in znova je bilo poudarjeno – podobno kot že na prejšnjih srečanjih – da je treba poiskati ustrezno rešitev, da se konča trenutna prevlada Združenih držav pri upravljanju organizacije ICANN.
During its last meeting, held in Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt, it was decided that the forum’s mandate should be extended and, as in previous meetings, the need to find a solution to the present US dominance in ICANN’s management was once more stressed.
Glede na vse našteto in na stališča v mednarodni skupnosti o organizaciji ICANN sledi, da bi bilo to ameriško organizacijo modro ohraniti – za kar se zavzema tudi Komisija –, zlasti ker je v letih svojega obstoja svoje naloge opravljala učinkovito in zadovoljivo.
In view of the above and current positions within the international community on ICANN, it follows that it would be prudent to keep the American organisation – as the Commission advocates – especially since it has performed its duties effectively and satisfactorily over the years it has been in existence.
Kljub temu pa je jasno, da je treba organizacijo ICANN reformirati, da bo bolj ustrezala svojemu namenu.
However, it is clear that some reforms and corrections to relevance are needed at ICANN.
Če velja, da je kibernetski prostor območje svobode, inovacije, prožnosti in prilagajanja, ne moremo hkrati zahtevati, da je njen osrednji organizacijski organ, ICANN, okorel in neprilagodljiv.
Because, if we hold to it that cyberspace is an area of freedom, innovation, flexibility and adaptability, we cannot at the same time expect its central organisational body, ICANN, to be rigid and inflexible.
Če je internetni svet dinamičen, je treba to dinamiko prenesti tudi na organizacijo ICANN.
If the world of the internet is dynamic, this dynamism must also apply to ICANN.