natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Plinske turbine za nujne primere, ki obratujejo manj kot 500 ur na leto so izvzete iz teh mejnih vrednosti emisij iz te točke.
Gas turbines for emergency use that operate less than 500 hours per year are excluded from the emission limit values set out in this point .
Plinske turbine ali plinski motorji za nujne primere, ki obratujejo manj kot 500 ur na leto , so izvzete iz teh mejnih vrednosti emisij iz te točke.
Gas turbines or gas engines for emergency use that operate less than 500 hours per year are not covered by the emission limit values set out in this point.
Plinski motorji za proizvodnjo električne energije pogosto neposredno tekmujejo s plinskimi turbinami.
Gas engines for generating electricity are often in direct competition with gas turbines.
Izvzetje plinskih motorjev za nujne primere iz mejnih vrednosti emisij zagotavlja, da se ti motorji obravnavajo enako kot plinske turbine.
Allowing ‘emergency’ gas engines to be exempted from the ELVs ensures that they are treated equally with gas turbines.
Uvedba sekundarnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje emisij (zlasti selektivne katalitične redukcije) za te naprave, ki obratujejo zelo omejeno število ur in delujejo le v nujnih primerih, bi povzročila visoke stroške, koristi za okolje pa bi bile glede na omejeno število obratovalnih ur na leto zanemarljive.
For these plants, operating a very limited number of hours and functioning only in ‘emergency’ cases, applying secondary abatement measures (in particular selective catalytic reduction or SCR) would lead to high costs with very little environmental benefit, given the limited number of operating hours per year.
Priloga V – del 3 – točka 1
Annex V – Part 3 – point 1
Koncentracije SO2, NOx, in prahu v odpadnih plinih iz vsake kurilne naprave z vhodno toplotno močjo 100 MW ali več se merijo neprekinjeno.
The concentrations of SO 2 , NO x and dust in waste gases from each combustion plant with a rated thermal input of 100 MW or more shall be measured continuously .
Koncentracije SO2, NOx, CO in prahu v odpadnih plinih iz vsake kurilne naprave z vhodno toplotno močjo 100 MW ali več se merijo neprekinjeno.
The concentrations of SO 2 , NO x , CO and dust in waste gases from each combustion plant with a rated thermal input of 100 MW or more shall be measured continuously.
Koncentracija CO v odpadnih plinih iz kurilnih naprav na plinasta goriva z nazivno vhodno močjo 100 MW ali več se meri neprekinjeno.
The concentration of CO in waste gases from combustion plants firing gaseous fuels with a rated thermal input of 100 MW or more shall be measured continuously.
Ker se CO lahko šteje za pomemben parameter za vse kurilne naprave pri nadzoru postopka zgorevanja , je treba uvesti stalno spremljanje.
As CO may be considered as a relevant parameter for all combustion plants in order to control the combustion process, it is important to have continuous monitoring in place
Priloga V – del 4 – točka 1
Annex V – Part 4 – point 1
Pri neprekinjenih meritvah se šteje, da so mejne vrednosti emisij iz delov 1 in 2 dosežene, če vrednotenje rezultatov meritev za obratovalne ure v koledarskem letu kaže, da so izpolnjeni vsi naslednji pogoji:
In the case of continuous measurements, the emission limit values set out in Parts 1 and 2 shall be regarded as having been complied with if the evaluation of the measurement results indicates, for operating hours within a calendar year, that all of the following conditions have been met :
(a) nobena validirana mesečna povprečna vrednost ne presega ustreznih mejnih vrednosti emisij iz delov 1 in 2;
(a) no validated monthly average value exceeds the relevant emission limit values set out in Parts 1 and 2;
(a) nobena validirana dnevna povprečna vrednost ne presega ustreznih mejnih vrednosti emisij iz delov 1 in 2;
(a) no validated daily average value exceeds the relevant emission limit values set out in Parts 1 and 2;
(b) nobena validirana dnevna povprečna vrednost ne presega 110 % ustreznih mejnih vrednosti emisij iz delov 1 in 2;
(b) no validated daily average value exceeds 110 % of the relevant emission limit values set out in Parts 1 and 2;
(c) pri kurilnih napravah, ki jih sestavljajo samo kotli na premog z nazivno vhodno toplotno močjo pod 50 MW, nobena validirana dnevna povprečna vrednost ne presega 150 % ustreznih mejnih vrednosti emisij iz delov1 in 2,
(c) in cases of combustion plants composed only of boilers using coal with a rated thermal input below 50 MW, no validated daily average value exceeds 150 % of the relevant emission limit values set out in Parts 1 and 2,
(d) 95 % vseh validiranih urnih povprečnih vrednosti v letu ne presega 200 % ustreznih mejnih vrednosti emisij iz delov 1 in 2.
(d) 95 % of all the validated hourly average values over the year do not exceed 200 % of the relevant emission limit values set out in Parts 1 and 2.
Validirane povprečne vrednosti se določijo v skladu s točko 10 dela 3.
The validated average values are determined as set out in point 10 of Part 3.
Pri izračunu povprečnih vrednosti emisij se vrednosti, izmerjene v obdobjih iz členov 33(4) in (5), člena 34 ter ob zagonu in ustavitvi, ne upoštevajo.
For the purpose of the calculation of the average emission values, the values measured during the periods referred to in Article 33(4) and (5) and Article 34 as well as during the start-up and shut-down periods shall be disregarded.
Priloga VI – del 6 – točka 2.5
Annex VI – Part 6 – point 2.5
Pristojni organ se lahko odloči, da ne zahteva neprekinjenih meritev za HCI, HF in SO2 v sežigalnici odpadkov ali napravi za sosežig odpadkov , ter zahteva meritve v rednih časovnih presledkih, kot so določene v točki 2.1(c), ali pa ne zahteva nobenih meritev, če upravljavec lahko dokaže, da emisije teh onesnaževal nikakor ne morejo biti večje od predpisanih mejnih vrednosti emisij.
The competent authority may decide not to require continuous measurements for HCI, HF and SO 2 in waste incineration plants or waste co-incineration plants and require periodic measurements as set out in point 2.1(c) or no measurements if the operator can prove that the emissions of those pollutants can under no circumstances be higher than the prescribed emission limit values.
Pristojni organ se lahko odloči, da ne zahteva neprekinjenih meritev za HCI, HF in SO2 v sežigalnici odpadkov ali napravi za sosežig odpadkov ter zahteva meritve v rednih časovnih presledkih, kot so določene v točki 2.1(c), če upravljavec lahko dokaže, da emisije teh onesnaževal nikakor ne morejo biti večje od predpisanih mejnih vrednosti emisij.
The competent authority may decide not to require continuous measurements for HCI, HF and SO 2 in waste incineration plants or waste co-incineration plants and require periodic measurements as set out in point 2.1(c) if the operator can prove that the emissions of those pollutants can under no circumstances be higher than the prescribed emission limit values.
To odstopanje se ne uporablja za primere zažiganja mešanih odpadkov iz različnih virov.
This derogation shall not be applied in cases of burning mixed waste from different sources.
Pristojni organ se lahko odloči, da ne zahteva neprekinjenih meritev NOx, in zahteva meritve v rednih časovnih presledkih, kot jih določa točka 2.1(c), v obstoječih sežigalnicah odpadkov z nazivno zmogljivostjo manj kot 6 ton na uro ali v obstoječih napravah za sosežig odpadkov z nazivno zmogljivostjo manj kot 6 ton na uro, če lahko upravljavec na podlagi informacij o kakovosti zadevnih odpadkov, uporabljenih tehnologij in rezultatov spremljanja emisij dokaže, da emisije NOx v nobenem primeru ne morejo biti višje od predpisane mejne vrednosti emisij.
The competent authority may decide not to require continuous measurements for NO x and require periodic measurements as set out in point 2.1(c) in existing waste incineration plants with a nominal capacity of less than 6 tonnes per hour or in existing waste co-incineration plants with a nominal capacity of less than 6 tonnes per hour if the operator can prove on the basis of information on the quality of the waste concerned, the technologies used and the results of the monitoring of emissions that the emissions of NO x can under no circumstances be higher than the prescribed emission limit value.
Predlog Komisije predvideva posebne primere, ko pristojni organi ne morejo zahtevati meritev HCl, HF in SO2.
The Commission proposal foresees specific cases where no requirements of HCl, HF and SO2 can be required by competent authorities.
Kompromisni predlog upošteva predloge sprememb, v katerih se je dodatna predlagana prilagodljivost črtala.
The compromise proposal takes into account the amendments, which removed the additional proposed flexibility.
Predlog Komisije predvideva tudi posebne primere, v katerih se NOx lahko meri v rednih časovnih presledkih in ne neprekinjeno.
The Commission proposal furthermore foresees specific cases where NOx can be subject to periodic measurements instead of continuous measurements.
V številnih predlogih sprememb se je predlagalo črtanje dodatne predlagane prilagodljivosti.
Several amendments proposed to remove the additional proposed flexibility.
Priloga VI – del 6 – točka 2.6 – uvodni odstavek
Annex VI – Part 6 – point 2.6 – introductory paragraph
Pristojni organ se lahko odloči, da za težke kovine, dioksine in furane zahteva manj kot dve meritvi letno ali da sploh ne zahteva meritve , in sicer v naslednjih primerih:
The competent authority may decide to require less than two measurements per year or no measurements for heavy metals and for dioxins and furans in the following cases:
Pristojni organ se lahko odloči, da za težke kovine, dioksine in furane zahteva le eno meritev letno, in sicer v naslednjih primerih:
The competent authority may decide to require only one measurement per year for heavy metals and for dioxins and furans in the following cases:
Priloga VI – del 6 – točka 2.6 – točka c a (novo)
Annex VI – Part 6 – point 2.6 – point c a (new)
(ca) upravljavec lahko dokaže, da se ne obdelujejo električni ali elektronski odpadki ali odpadki, ki vsebujejo klorirane sestavine.
(ca) the operator can prove that neither electric or electronic waste, nor waste containing chlorinated compounds is being treated.
Varstvo okolja s celostnim pristopom pri izdaji dovoljenj obratom
Environmental protection on the basis of an integrated approach to the issuing of permits for installations
Namen predloga direktive je pregledati in združiti sedem različnih direktiv o industrijskih emisijah v eno samo besedilo.
The aim of the proposal for a directive is to review and consolidate in one single text seven separate directives on industrial emissions.
Zakonodajni postopek zadeva 52 000 industrijskih obratov v Evropi, ki proizvajajo velik delež emisij onesnaževal v Evropi in prispevajo, da zadani cilji v okviru tematske strategije za preprečevanje onesnaževanja ozračja niso doseženi.
This legislative procedure will affect 52 000 industrial installations in Europe, which account for a major proportion of pollutant emissions in Europe and are to some degree responsible for the failure to achieve the targets laid down in the thematic strategy on the prevention of air pollution.
Predlog Komisije zagotavlja celovit pristop, ki v najširši meri in na najbolj uravnotežen način omogoča upoštevanje okoljskih vidikov pri izdaji dovoljenj obratom.
The Commission proposal provides for an integrated approach with the aim of ensuring that environmental aspects are taken into account, in the most comprehensive and balanced way possible, when permits are issued for installations.
Učinkovit nadzor nad emisijami z uporabo najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij (NRT) je cilj, ki ga je treba prav iz tega razloga uresničevati bolj dosledno kot v preteklosti.
One of the aims of the proposal is to impose effective limits on emissions through the employment of best available techniques (BATs); accordingly more stringent rules stipulating their use are to be introduced.
Pri tem je treba prav tako odpraviti izkrivljanje konkurence, ki nastane zaradi neenotne uporabe obstoječe zakonodaje.
Distortions of competition in the Community, caused by disparities in the transposition of the existing legislation, are to be remedied at the same time.
Poročevalec podpira strategije Komisije.
Your rapporteur supports the Commission’s strategy.
Pozdravlja celostni pristop in prav tako strožje predpise za uporabo najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij.
The integrated approach is welcome, as are the more stringent provisions governing the use of best available techniques.
Namen predlogov sprememb je preprečiti napačno razlago in izboljšati instrumente direktive, poenostaviti izvajanje in zmanjšati nepotrebno birokracijo.
The amendments seek to strengthen the provisions of the directive and safeguard against their misinterpretation, to simplify transposition, and to do away with unnecessary red tape.
Evropska varnostna mreža
European safety network
Namen prve korenite spremembe je, da se pri opisu NRT v obstoječi obliki ohrani plodna izmenjava informacij med interesnimi skupinami, kot so industrija in nevladne organizacije (seviljski postopek).
The aim of the first fundamental proposed change is to retain in its current form the valuable information exchange between interest groups, such as the industry and non-governmental organisations (‘Seville Process’), as part of the process of describing the best available techniques.
Rezultat tega sodelovanja ostaja referenčni dokument NRT.
The result of this process will still be the BAT reference document.
Poročevalec podpira uvedbo pravno zavezujoče mejne vrednosti emisij.
The introduction of legally binding emission limit values is welcome.
Predlog Komisije predvideva, da mejne vrednosti neposredno izhajajo iz referenčnih dokumentov NRT.
The Commission proposal provides for limit values to be determined directly on the basis of the BAT reference documents.
Ta pristop bi bil le deloma operativen in bi zato lahko imel neželene politične posledice na seviljski postopek.
This is not workable in practice and would result in undesirable political influence being exerted on the Seville Process.
Iz tega razloga je druga temeljna sprememba, ki jo predlaga poročevalec, ustanovitev odbora za komitologijo, ki bi bil pod parlamentarnim nadzorom in bi določal ukrepe za zmanjševanje emisij v obliki minimalnih standardov.
The second fundamental change proposed by your rapporteur therefore provides for the setting-up of a comitology committee subject to parliamentary scrutiny, which will have the task of laying down measures to limit emissions in the form of minimum requirements.
Minimalni standardi določajo evropsko varnostno mrežo, ki bi jo moral upoštevati vsak obrat.
The minimum requirements will form a European safety network whose rules may not be breached by any installation.
Ukrepi za zmanjšanje emisij, ki jih določajo pristojni organi na lokalni ravni, so določeni za posamezne obrate, ki morajo v povprečju izpolnjevati standarde referenčnih dokumentov NRT, in istočasno predvidevajo potreben manevrski prostor za upoštevanje lokalnih značilnosti.
At the level of the competent authorities on the spot, measures to limit emissions are laid down for individual installations which are designed to result in emission levels which on average meet the requirements aid down in the BAT reference documents, with some leeway so that proper account can be taken of local circumstances.
Tako se odpravi težava, da v okviru običajnega delovanja vsak obrat lahko ob zagonu naprave povzroči stopnjo emisij, ki presegajo tiste, navedene v opisu najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologij.
This provision is intended to deal with the problem that spikes in emission values which may exceed the levels associated with the descriptions of the best available techniques may occur during normal operations, for example when an installation is started up.
V vsakem primeru pa je treba upoštevati meje, ki jih določa evropska varnostna mreža.
On no account, however, may the ceilings imposed by the European Safety Network be exceeded.
Omejitev upravnega bremena
Curbing administrative costs
Med cilje Komisije pri reviziji direktive spada med drugim zmanjšanje upravnih obremenitev, ki jih poročevalec odločno podpira.
One of the Commission’s aims in revising the directive, and one which your rapporteur fully supports, is to reduce red tape.
Vrsta sprememb mora revizijo v tem pogledu še izboljšati, zlasti omilitev togih predpisov pri inšpekcijskih pregledih obratov in obveza upravljavca do poročanja o upoštevanju norm.
A series of amendments seek to improve the revision proposal in this respect: they provide for the relaxation of rigid rules concerning inspections of installations and of the requirement that operators should submit reports on compliance with permit conditions.
Poleg tega bi pristojnim organom koristila večja prilagodljivost na tem področju, tako bi lahko uporabili svoje vire tam, kjer so potrebni, kot v primeru obratov, ki jih je z vidika okoljske varnosti treba podrobno spremljati.
These less stringent provisions will also benefit the competent authorities, since they will be able to use their resources where they are needed, for example focusing on installations which require closer scrutiny from the point of view of environmental safety.
Poleg tega poročevalec predlaga spremembe za krepitev vloge Parlamenta pri prihodnjih spremembah nebistvenih elementov te direktive, oziroma zagotavljanju, da se pri odločitvah Komisije ustrezno upošteva zunanje strokovno znanje in je zagotovljena preglednost gospodarskih vplivov odločitev.
In addition, your rapporteur has tabled amendments designed to strengthen Parliament’s role in connection with future amendments of non-essential provisions of the directive, to ensure that Commission decisions take due account of the views of external experts and to make the economic implications of such decisions transparent.
Vendar pa je treba razširitev področja uporabe direktive preprečiti v primerih, ko prednosti, ki bi jih pričakovali za okolje, ne upravičujejo povzročenih stroškov.
In contrast, extensions to the scope of the directive should be reversed in cases where the likely environmental benefits do not justify the costs.
Enako velja tudi za strožje določbe o zaščiti tal in podtalnice, ki je že zakonsko urejena na ravni Skupnosti ali nacionalni ravni.
The same applies to stringent provisions on soil and groundwater protection, matters which are already dealt with at Community or national level.
Predsednik Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
Chairman of the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Zadeva: Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja) (prenovitev)
Subject : Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (recast version)
(KOM(2007)844 – C6 0002/2008 – 2007/0286(COD) )
(COM(2007)844 – C6 0002/2008 – 2007/0286(COD) )
Odbor za pravne zadeve, ki mu predsedujem, je proučil navedeni predlog v skladu s členom 80a o ponovnem sprejetju pravnih aktov, ki ga je Parlament vključil v svoj poslovnik s sklepom z dne 10. maja 2007.
The Committee on Legal Affairs, which I am honoured to chair, has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to Rule 80a on Recasting, as introduced into the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure by its Decision of 10 May 2007.
V odstavkih 3 in 4 navedenega člena je zapisano:
Paragraph 3 and 4 of that Rule reads as follows:
"(3) „Če odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve, meni, da predlog ne vsebuje vsebinskih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so bile opredeljene kot take, o tem obvesti pristojni odbor.
‘(3) If the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal does not entail any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal, it shall inform the committee responsible.
(4) Če odbor, pristojen za pravne zadeve, meni, da predlog vsebuje vsebinske spremembe, razen tistih, ki so bile opredeljene kot take, predlaga Parlamentu zavrnitev predloga in o tem obvesti pristojni odbor.
(4) I f the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal entails substantive changes other than those which have been identified as such in the proposal, it shall propose that Parliament reject the proposal and it shall inform the committee responsible that it has done so.
Če Komisija to stori, predsednik ugotovi, da je postopek brezpre dmeten, in s tem seznani Svet.
If the Commission does so, the President shall hold the procedure to be superfluous and shall inform the Council accordingly.
Če Komisija svojega predloga ne umakne, Parlament zadevo vrne pristojnemu odboru, ki jo pregleda po običajnem postopku.
If the Commission does not withdraw the proposal, Parliament shall refer the matter back to the committee responsible for the subject matter, which shall consider it in accordance with the normal procedure.’
Odbor za pravne zadeve na podlagi mnenja pravne službe, katere predstavniki so se udeležili sestankov posvetovalne delovne skupine za preučitev prenovljenega predloga, in v skladu s priporočili poročevalca meni, da zadevni predlog ne vključuje bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v njem, v mnenju ali v nadaljnjem besedilu opredeljene kot take, in da je predlog, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih aktov z omenjenimi spremembami, zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb.
Following the opinion of the Legal Service, whose representatives participated in the meetings of the Consultative Working Party examining the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the Draftsperson, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that the proposal in question does not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal, in the opinion or hereinafter and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those changes, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
V skladu s členoma 80a(2) in 80(3) meni, da so bile tehnične prilagoditve, ki jih je v svojem mnenju predlagala omenjena delovna skupina, potrebne za zagotovitev skladnosti predloga s pravili kodifikacije in da predlog zaradi njih ni bil bistveno spremenjen.
Pursuant to Rules 80a(2) and 80(3), the Committee on Legal Affairs considered that the technical adaptations suggested in the opinion of the abovementioned Working Party were necessary in order to ensure that the proposal complied with the codification rules and that they did not involve any substantive change to the proposal.
Poleg tega Odbor na podlagi priporočil poročevalca in v skladu s členoma 80a(2) in 80(3) meni, da je treba sledeče določbe, ki so že bile prečrtane z dvojno črto, osenčiti s sivo barvo za označitev bistvenih sprememb:
In addition, following the recommendations of the Draftsperson and pursuant to Rules 80a(2) and 80(3), the Committee on Legal Affairs considered that the following provisions, which had already been marked with double strikethrough, should be identified by using the grey-shaded type used for marking substantive changes:
· Člen 3, št. 12, črtanje drugega stavka „ v tej opredelitvi se šteje, da imajo interes nevladne organizacije, ki pospešujejo varstvo okolja in izpolnjujejo katere koli zahteve nacionalne zakonodaje “;
· Art. 3, No. 12, deletion of the second sentence ‘ for the purpose of this definition, non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection and meeting any requirements under national law shall be deemed to have an interest ’;
· Člen 12, št. 8, črtanje besed „ stanje, kot je opredeljeno v členu 23(2) in (3) “;
· Art. 12, No 8, deletion of the words ‘ state defined in accordance with Article 23(2) and (3) ’;
· člen 29, črtanje besed „ med “ in „ o najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologijah, z njimi povezanem spremljanju stanja in njihovem razvoju “.
· in Article 29, the words ‘ between ’ and ‘ on best available techniques, associated monitoring, and developments in them... ’.