natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prav tako sta sektorja plina in elektrike zelo različne narave, zaradi česar so možnosti ločevanja toliko bolj zapletene za plin.
Finally, the gas and electricity sectors are of a very different nature which makes the unbundling options more complicated for gas.
Ta tema bo razvita v nadaljevanju dokumenta.
This issue will be explored further in this document.
Poročevalec želi poudariti pomen novih množičnih naložb v razvoj nove in nadgrajevanje sedanje infrastrukture.
The Rapporteur would like to stress the importance of new investments at a massive scale in the development of new and upgrading of current infrastructure.
Čeprav je zaskrbljen zaradi razlik med trenutnimi naložbami in oceno potrebnih naložb, se ne strinja z izjavo Komisije, da naložb ni več.
While he is concerned about the gap between current investments and those estimated to be required, he does not agree with the Commission in their statement that investments have stopped.
Celotni znesek naložb v vzdrževanje in razvoj plinskih omrežij je v zadnjih letih stalno, čeprav počasi, naraščal.
Indeed, overall investments in maintaining and development of gas networks have had a consistent, albeit slow, increasing trend in the past years.
Ta skrb velja tudi za pomanjkanje investicij v medsebojne povezave, ki izhaja iz razlik v standardih, pomanjkanja neodvisnih regulativnih organov za nadzor nad čezmejnim prenosom in iz zmanjšanja razpoložljivosti mehanizmov za kritje čezmejnih stroškov.
This concern also applies to the lack of investments in interconnections derived of the disparity between standards, lack of an independent regulatory authority to oversee cross-border transmission and reduced availability of mechanisms to recover trans-border costs.
Ostaja pa veliko prostora za izboljšanje, izvajati je treba ukrepe kot je nadaljnje ločevanje (lastništva ali ISO+), bolj učinkovita ureditev in boljše čezmejno sodelovanje.
There is, however, much room for improvement and measures have to be taken such as further unbundling – whether ownership or ISO+ -, more efficient regulation and better cross-border cooperation.
Nova obsežna proizvodnja iz obnovljivih virov energije
New Massive Generation from renewable energy sources
Evropa razpolaga z veliko količino obnovljivih virov energije vključno z vodo, vetrom, soncem, biomaso, plimo in geotermalno energijo.
Europe enjoys vast quantities of renewable energy sources including hydro, wind, solar, biomass, tidal and geothermal.
Obnovljivi viri energije so po naravi zbrani na določeni lokaciji, na primer vodni viri v goratih regijah, veter na odprtem morju, v obalnih in goratih regijah.
Renewable energy sources by their very nature are concentrated in specific locations, e.g. hydro resources in mountainous regions, or wind resources in offshore, coastal and highland regions.
Razen v izjemnih primerih ti viri niso prenosljivi v svoji primarni obliki in jih je zato treba pretvoriti v elektriko na mestu, kjer se nahaja primarni vir.
With a few exceptions these resources are not transportable in their primary form and so need to be converted to electricity in the location where the primary resource exists.
Če torej želimo, da obsežni primarni viri energije prispevajo k potrebam Evropske unije po elektriki, so potrebne zadostne omrežne infrastrukture, ki bi omogočale prenos elektrike iz teh regij v središča povpraševanja.
If, therefore, these vast primary energy sources are to contribute to the European Union’s electricity requirements, they need the sufficient grid infrastructure to allow for the bulk transport of electricity from these regions to centres of demand.
Nad morji severozahodne Evrope se na primer nahaja obsežen, v tržne namene uporaben, vir vetrne energije.
For example there is a large commercially exploitable resource of wind energy above the seas of north Western Europe.
Zato so potrebna velika podmorska omrežja za prenos te elektrike na obalo in kopenska omrežja iz katerih se ta elektrika odpelje naprej v središča povpraševanja.
Large sub sea grids are therefore required to bring this power to shore and onshore grids to take the electricity further to centres of demand.
Pomembno je, da se vzdržujejo že obstoječa omrežja in da se vzpostavijo nova, kjer še ne obstajajo.
It is important therefore that these grids are maintained where they already exist and established where they do not.
Podjetja za prenos potrebujejo spodbude za razvoj in gradnjo takšnih omrežij in ne smejo imeti konkurenčnih interesov, ki lahko ogrozijo njihov razvoj .
Transmission companies must be incentivised to develop and build such grids and must not have competing interests which may hinder their development.
Trenutno mora Evropska unija na notranjem energetskem trgu prilagoditi 27 različnih nacionalnih regulatorjev, ki so med seboj zelo različni.
Currently, the European Union’s internal energy market has to adjust to 27 different national regulations that can differ greatly from one to another.
Postopek za opredelitev ukrepov, ki jih je treba izvesti na področju čezmejnega prenosa, je sestavljen iz posvetovanja med nacionalnimi regulatorji na podlagi tehničnih predlogov s strani upravljavcev prenosnih omrežij, kjer se odločitve ponavadi sprejemajo na podlagi soglasja.
The procedure for the definition of actions to be taken on cross border transmissions consists in a consultation between national regulators based on technical proposals by the Transmission System Operators and where the decisions are taken generally on the basis of consensus.
Če ne pride do sporazuma, Komisija sproži postopek komitologije, ki zelo počasi prinese sprejemljive rezultate, prav tako pa v postopku odločajo države članice, ki se o zadevi posvetujejo s svojimi nacionalnimi regulatorji.
If no agreement can be reached, the Commission launches a commitology procedure in which not only acceptable outcomes are very slow to come, but where those deciding are Member States who refer back to their national regulators for advice.
To zadevo pripelje nazaj na začetek.
This brings the situation back to square one.
Če želi EU imeti popolnoma integriran notranji trg, je potrebnih nekaj ukrepov za zagotovitev bolj formalnega pristopa k zgoraj omenjenemu procesu.
If the EU is to have a fully integrated internal market some actions will have to be taken to provide a more formal approach to the process explained above.
Poročevalec predlaga, naj forum regulatorjev postane uraden organ, kjer bi morali, po potrebi z glasovanjem, sprejemati odločitve in kjer bi v primeru zastoja odločila Komisija.
The Rapporteur suggests making the Regulators’ forum a formal body in which decisions would have to be taken – by vote if necessary – and where, in case of a deadlock, the Commission could decide.
Odločitve bi morale izhajati iz predlogov upravljavcev prenosnih omrežij, ki bi prav tako morali imeti formalni okvir za njihove postopke odločanja.
The decisions should derive from proposals by the TSOs who, in turn, should also have a formal framework for their decision-making processes.
Pomembno je poudariti, da bi se regulatorji ukvarjali samo s čezmejnimi tehničnimi in trgovinskimi vprašanji, kot je uskladitev tehničnih standardov in spodbujanje usklajevanja pri razvoju medsebojnih povezav in čezmejnega prenosa.
It is important to point out that Regulators would be dealing exclusively with cross-border technical and trade issues such as harmonisation of technical standards and promote coordination of the development of interconnections and cross-border transmission.
Odločitve nacionalnih regulatorjev bi morale biti suverene v njihovih državah članicah, njihova odgovornost in pooblastila pa bi morali biti neodvisni, močni in dobro opredeljeni.
National Regulators’ decision should remain sovereign over their respective Member State and their responsibilities and powers should be independent, strong and well defined.
Regulatorji bi lahko igrali odločilno vlogo pri zagotavljanju potrebnih naložb, enakih pogojev za vse akterje na trgu in preglednosti.
Regulators could play a decisive role in ensuring the necessary investments, equal playing field for all market players and transparency.
Glede naložb pa bi morali regulatorji imeti na primer moč, da naložbe odprejo tretjim stranem, če odgovorna podjetja postavijo ovire za razvoj omrežja.
Regarding investments, regulators could be given, for example, the power to open investment to third parties should incumbent undertakings pose barriers for the development of the grid.
Poročevalec pozdravlja zadnje stališče Komisije in Sveta v zvezi z doseganjem 10-odstotne ravni medsebojne povezanosti v vseh državah članicah.
The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission and Council’s latest position regarding the achievement of 10% interconnections in all Member States.
Vseeno pa želi poudariti, da je bil ta cilj zastavljen že pred leti na barcelonskem vrhu, in upa, da bodo države članice naredile odločilne korake pri odstranjevanju ovir nadaljnjemu razvoju, saj je dokončno oblikovanje notranjega energetskega trga pridobilo nov pomen za Evropsko unijo.
Nevertheless, he would like to point out that this objective was set years ago in the Barcelona Summit and hopes that, given that the completion of the energy internal market has acquired renewed importance in the European Union, Member States will take decisive steps in the removal of all barriers to their development.
Novo sodelovanje med regulatorji na ravni EU bi moralo zagotoviti potreben regulativni okvir za preseganje nekaterih ovir, javni organi pa bi si morali prizadevati tudi za odstranitev političnih ovir.
The new cooperation between regulators at EU level should provide the necessary regulatory framework to overcome some of these barriers but public authorities should strive to remove political obstacles as well.
Ta točka je še posebej pomembna za obrobne države članice, ki zaenkrat še ostajajo energetski otoki.
This point is of particular importance for peripheral Member States who, at present times, remain energy islands.
Poročevalec je trdno prepričan, da bi morale biti splošne regulirane tarife za gospodarske odjemalce odpravljene, saj povzročajo hudo izkrivljanje trga in jih vertikalno povezana podjetja lahko včasih uporabijo, da nove udeležence izrinejo s trga.
The Rapporteur strongly believes that generalised regulated tariffs for commercial customers should disappear as they cause serious distortions in the market and can sometimes be used by vertically integrated companies to force newcomers out of the market.
Dodatne pripombe
Additional comments
Trg plina
Gas market
Za razliko od trga z električno energijo večina plinskih podjetij ustvarja dobiček iz distribucijskih dejavnosti in ne s proizvodnimi zmogljivostmi.
Unlike the electricity market, most gas undertakings make their profits from distribution activities rather than generation capacity.
Zato bi bili različni predlogi Komisije za ločevanje težko izvedljivi v tem sektorju ali vsaj v podjetjih, ki svoje proizvode uvažajo v Evropsko unijo.
For this reason, the different proposals put forward by the Commission on unbundling would be difficult to apply to this sector, or at least to those companies that import their product into the European Union.
Nekateri ukrepi, kot na primer tisti, ki jih predlaga ta dokument, bi lahko pomagali pri spopadanju s težavami pri naložbah, preglednosti in dostopu do omrežij.
Some measures, such as those proposed in this document, could help tackle the problems of investments, transparency and access to the grid.
Poročevalec je zaskrbljen predvsem zaradi pomanjkanja usklajenih standardov za zemeljski plin.
The Rapporteur is concerned mainly by the lack of harmonised standards regarding natural gas.
To stanje povzroča negotovost na trgu, saj podjetja ne vedo, ali bo plin, ki ga kupijo na nekem področju, imel dostop do različnih nacionalnih omrežij.
This situation causes uncertainty in the market as companies do not know if the gas they buy in one field would be allowed access into the different national networks.
Komisija bi morala ta problem temeljito preučiti in čim prej najti rešitev.
The Commission should strongly look into this problem and find a solution in a timely manner.
Ta podjetja se soočajo tudi s problemom trgovinskega poslovanja s tretjimi državami, kjer se načelo vzajemnosti ne more uporabiti.
These companies also face the problem of dealing commercially with third countries in which the reciprocity principle cannot be applied.
Nimajo dostopa do predhodnih proizvodnih zmogljivosti niti do njihovih trgov pod podobnimi pogoji.
Indeed, they do not have access to upstream production capacities, nor do they have access on similar terms to their markets.
Poročevalec je zaskrbljen glede trditev nekaterih akterjev na trgu v zvezi s pravicami trgovanja z emisijami.
The Rapporteur is concerned about some claims made by some market players regarding Emission Trading rights.
Ti so prepričani, da se na računu za energijo potrošnikom zaračunava dodatna cena za sistem trgovanja z emisijami, medtem ko je bila večina teh pravic pridobljena brezplačno v skladu s sedanjo direktivo o sistemu trgovanja z emisijami, ki navaja, da bi bilo treba vsaj 95 % pravic emisije v prvi fazi podeliti brezplačno.
They believe that consumers are being charged the additional price of ETS in their energy bill when the majority of these rights have been obtained for free, under the current ETS directive that states that at least 95% of emission rights should be awarded for free in this first phase.
o možnostih za notranji trg s plinom in električno energijo
on the Prospects for the internal gas and electricity market
(*) Okrepljeno sodelovanje med odbori - člen 47 Poslovnika
(*) Enhanced cooperation between committees  Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
A. ker mora biti nova evropska energetska politika za trajnostno, zanesljivo in konkurenčno energijo ambiciozna in mora težiti k dolgoročnim koristim, osredotočiti pa se mora zlasti na boj proti podnebnim spremembam, zmanjševanje zunanje ranljivosti EU zaradi uvoza in spodbujanje rasti in delovnih mest;
A. Whereas the new European energy policy for sustainable, secure and competitive energy needs to be ambitious and aimed at long-term benefits, with the main focus on combating climate change, limiting the EU's external vulnerability to imports, and promoting growth and jobs;
B. ker je treba pravočasno vzpostaviti ustrezen zakonodajni okvir v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, da se dosežejo te ambiciozne in dolgoročne koristi;
B. Whereas an adequate legislative framework in accordance with the principle of sudsidiarity has to be established in a timely manner in order to achieve these ambitious and long-term benefits;
C. ker je Komisija v svojem sporočilu o možnostih za notranji trg s plinom in električno energijo ( KOM(2006)0841 ) in v poročilu GD za konkurenco o raziskavi energetskega sektorja ( SEC(2006)1724 ) ugotovila, da veljavna pravila in ukrepi za liberalizacijo vodijo do izboljšanja učinkovitosti oskrbe z energijo in odjemalcem omogočajo prihranke, da pa trg še ni odprt v celoti ter da še obstajajo ovire za svobodno konkurenco; ker države članice ravno tako še niso v celoti in ustrezno prenesle veljavnega zakonodajnega okvira v nacionalno zakonodajo, zato so potrebni nadaljnji koraki za uresničitev liberalizacije trga;
C. Whereas the Commission communication on the prospects for the internal gas and electricity market ( COM(2006)0841 ) and the DG Competition report on the Energy Sector Inquiry ( SEC(2006)1724 ) conclude that the present rules and liberalisation measures have led to efficiency improvements in energy supply and delivered savings to customers, but that markets have not yet been opened fully and barriers to free competition still remain; whereas, moreover, the existing legislative framework has not yet been fully and duly transposed by the Member States into national law and further steps are therefore necessary in order to achieve market liberalisation;
D. ker je nekaj držav članic odprlo svoj trg s plinom; ker so nižje cene in kakovost storitev pri oskrbi na trgu s plinom ključne za celotni sistem: za potrošnike in podjetja;
D. Whereas few Member States have opened their gas markets; whereas lower prices and a quality service in the supply in the gas market are key for the whole system, both for consumers and enterprises;
E. ker je Evropski parlament v resoluciji z dne 14. decembra 2006 o evropski strategiji za trajnostno, konkurenčno in varno energijo ‑ Zelena knjiga
E. Whereas in its resolution of 14 December 2006 on a European strategy for sustainable, competitive and secure energy - Green Paper
Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0603 . poudaril, da morajo biti prenosna omrežja v energetskem sektorju predmet popolne razdružitve lastništva, takoj ko Komisija ugotovi, da je obstoječa zakonodaja neučinkovita;
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0603 . , Parliament stressed that transmission systems in the energy sector should undergo full ownership unbundling as soon as the Commission has concluded that existing legislation is ineffective;
F. ker Komisija po raziskavi sektorja in na podlagi ekonomskih dokazov meni, da je razdružitev lastništva najučinkovitejši način za zagotovitev izbire porabnikom energije in za spodbujanje naložb;
F. Whereas following the sector inquiry and in light of the economic evidence, the Commission considers that ownership unbundling is the most effective means to ensuring choice for energy users and to encourage investment;
G. ker sedanjih regulativnih vrzeli pri čezmejnih vprašanjih ni mogoče odpraviti samo z izvajanjem pravil o konkurenci; ker bi bilo treba zagotoviti okrepljeno usklajevanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi na področju energetike, in sicer z dodelitvijo večjih pristojnosti evropskemu omrežju neodvisnih regulatorjev (ERGEG) in večjo nadzorno vlogo Skupnosti pri izvajanju načel notranjega trga;
G. Whereas the current regulatory cross-border gap cannot be remedied by the application of competition rules alone; whereas reinforced coordination between national energy regulators, by enhancing the competences of the European Regulators' Group for electricity and gas (ERGEG), with a stronger role for Community oversight to enforce internal market principles, should be ensured;
H. ker razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so države članice zgolj omejeno izvajale obveznosti pri usmerjenih javnih storitvah za ranljive odjemalce;
H. Whereas the available data suggest that Member States have made only limited use of targeted public service obligations to address vulnerable customers;
3. se strinja s Komisijo, da je proces liberalizacije edina možnost, in države članice poziva, naj zagotovijo popoln in učinkovit prenos obstoječih direktiv o liberalizaciji; poleg tega odobrava predlog Komisije, da je treba nepravilnosti pri delovanju trga odpraviti s protiukrepi na področju konkurence in ureditvenimi protiukrepi;
Agrees with the Commission that there is no alternative to the liberalisation process and calls on Member States to ensure full and effective transposition of existing liberalisation Directives; moreover, endorses the Commission proposal to address the malfunctioning of the market by applying both competition-based and regulatory remedies;
5. poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi analizo, v kateri so ustrezno prikazani pričakovani stroški držav članic pri razdružitvi lastništva, pričakovani vplivi na naložbe v omrežja ter koristi za notranji trg in odjemalce; poudarja, da mora analiza upoštevati tudi vprašanje, ali nastanejo težave ali stroški, in če nastanejo, kakšni so, če država ne opravi razdružitve, ter ali so negativne posledice za državno in zasebno lastništvo različne; predlaga, da je treba poleg tega analizirati, kakšne bi bile prednosti razdružitve lastništva za uresničitev ciljev v primerjavi s pristopom neodvisnega regionalnega upravljavca trga;
Calls on the Commission to present an analysis in which the expected costs of an ownership unbundling for the Member States, the expected effects on investments in the networks as well as the benefits for the internal market and the customer respectively demonstrated; points out that the analysis should also take account of the question whether and if so which problems or costs occur if no unbundling is carried out by the state as well as whether the negative consequences differ between state and private ownership; suggests that, furthermore, the advantages of ownership unbundling relative to the independent regional market operator approach as regards the achievements of objectives should be analysed;
7. pozdravlja predlog Komisije za krepitev neodvisnosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov na področju energetike, njihovih pristojnosti ter usklajevanja med njimi in upravljavci prenosnih omrežij; meni, da neodvisnost regulatorjev ne sme ovirati političnih ukrepov, ki jih morajo vlade držav članic sprejeti na notranjih trgih s plinom in električno energijo za spodbujanje konkurence, zanesljivo oskrbo in varstvo okolja;
Welcomes the Commission proposal to strengthen the national energy regulators' independence, to enhance their powers, to reinforce coordination between the regulators and the Transmission System Operators (TSO); considers that regulators' independence must not hamper the political action that Member State governments must take in order to foster competition, ensure security of supply and protect the environment in the internal gas and electricity markets;
9. se strinja s stališči Komisije, da je treba povečati pristojnosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov in izboljšati evropsko usklajevanje, zlasti pri čezmejnih vprašanjih;
Shares the views of the Commission that the powers of national regulators need to be strengthened and that European coordination must be enhanced, particularly as regards cross-border issues;
15. meni, da je treba odpraviti subvencije za neobnovljive vire energije in tako zagotoviti enake konkurenčne pogoje, da je treba zunanje okoljske stroške vračunati v ceno energije ter da je treba uporabiti tržne instrumente za doseganje ciljev okoljske in energetske politike;
Considers that subsidies for non-renewable sources of energy should be eliminated thereby ensuring a level playing field, that external environmental costs should be internalised in the price of energy and that market-based instruments should be used to achieve environmental and energy policy objectives;
Možnosti za notranji trg s plinom in električno energijo
Prospects for the internal gas and electricity market
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj
OPINIONOF THE COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
o možnostih za notranji trg s plinom in električno energijo
on prospects for the internal gas and electricity market
2. meni, da je dokončno oblikovanje trga z energijo povezano z gospodarsko, socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo, zlasti v regijah, ki zaostajajo, v tistih, kjer so naravne razmere neugodne, in v najbolj oddaljenih regijah;
Considers that the completion of the energy market is linked to the objective of economic, social and territorial cohesion, particularly in regions lagging behind, regions with natural disadvantages and the outermost regions;
4. poziva države članice, naj poenostavijo postopke pridobivanja dovoljenj za gradnjo novih državnih in čezmejnih prenosnih zmogljivosti, ker lahko razvoj medregionalnega in mednarodnega trga spodbudi razvoj notranjega trga EU;
Asks the Member States to simplify the licence procedures for the construction of new intrastate and cross-border transmission capacities since interregional and international market development can have a leverage effect on the development of the EU internal market;