natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parlament je v prvi obravnavi sledil predlogu Komisije z eno pomembno izjemo: po polemični razpravi je bila večina namreč proti temu, da bi se v uporabo uredbe vključile celinske plovne poti.
In its 1st reading Parliament essentially followed the Commission's proposal with one important exception: after a controversial debate a majority rejected the inclusion of inland waterways in the scope of the Regulation.
Sprejeti so bili še drugi predlogi sprememb o, denimo, predplačilih za žrtve, informiranju potnikov, odgovornosti v primeru terorističnih akcij, pooblastilih Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost, odpravi možnosti, da se uporabijo druge mednarodne konvencije o odgovornosti, opredelitvi višje omejitve odgovornosti šele po novem postopku soodločanja in prehodnih obdobjih za trajekte.
Further amendments were adopted covering issues like the advance payment for victims, information of passengers, liability in case of terrorism, powers of EMSA, exclusion of the possibility to apply other international conventions on liability, adoption of higher limits of liability only after a new codecision procedure and transition periods for ferries.
Tudi Svet je v skupnem stališču izključil celinske plovne poti, poleg tega pa se je od prvotnega predloga bistveno oddaljil v številnih drugih vprašanjih.
The Council in its common position also excluded inland waterways and in addition departed in many other aspects significantly from the original proposal.
Pri notranjem prevozu po morju je področje uporabe uredbe omejil na tako imenovane ladje razreda A, kar je pomenilo, da je bila izključena večina plovnih poti za razrede B, C in D, kakor so opredeljeni v direktivi 98/18/ES.
Council limited the scope of the Regulation in case of national transport by sea to so called class A ships thereby excluding the majority of shipping routes of classes B, C and D as defined in Directive 98/18/EC.
Omejil je še sorazmerno ugodne odškodnine za žrtve po atenski konvenciji in uporabil globalno mejo glede na meje iz Mednarodne konvencije o omejitvi odgovornosti za pomorske terjatve, kakor je bila spremenjena s protokolom iz leta 1996 (LLMC 96) (globalna omejitev civilne odgovornosti).
It also reduced the rather favourable compensation per victim of the Athens Convention by applying a global cap according to the limits of the International Convention on Limitation of Liability for maritime Claims as amended by the Protocol of 1996 (LLMC 96) (global limitation of civil liability).
Druge spremembe so zadevale omejitve predplačil in pravice do informiranosti.
Further changes concerned limitations as regards the advance payment and information rights.
Svet je sprejel stališče Parlamenta o nevarnostih, povezanih s terorističnimi akcijami.
Council accepted Parliament's position regarding terrorism related risks.
Pripravljenih je bilo več trialogov, a rešitve za osrednja odprta vprašanja, na primer področje uporabe in sistem odgovornosti, niso našli.
Several trialogues took place but no solution could be found for the main issues like the scope and the system of liability.
Po neuspešnih pogajanjih je Parlament v drugi obravnavi 24. novembra 2008 ponovno vložil večino predlogov sprememb iz prve obravnave in zavrnil omejitve, ki jih je vnesel Svet.
Following the failure of the negotiations Parliament reinstated in 2nd reading on 24.9.2008 most of its amendments from 1st reading and rejected the limitations Council had introduced.
Po glasovanju ob drugi obravnavi 24. septembra 2008 in zaradi politične volje, da se spravni postopek zaključi v času francoskega predsedovanja, je Parlament zelo hitro 7. oktobra 2008 ustanovil delegacijo v spravnem postopku.
Following the 2nd reading vote of 24.9.2008 and given the political will to conclude the conciliation under the French Presidency the Parliament's conciliation delegation was constituted very quickly on 7.10.2008.
Podpredsednik TAJANI je zastopal Komisijo.
Vice-President TAJANI represented the Commission.
Ne le, da je bil sočasno dosežen dogovor o „manjkajočih dveh“, pač pa so bila besedila, o katerih je bil dosežen dogovor v spravnem postopku, precej izboljšana.
Not only were the "missing two" concluded in parallel but many improvements were also made to the texts agreed in conciliation.
III.1 Ta predlog v spravnem postopku
III.1 This proposal in conciliation
Razprava o tem predlogu je bila najtežavnejša od vseh šestih v spravnem postopku in se je zaključila šele na spravnem večeru 8. decembra.
Discussions on this file were the most difficult ones of the six files in conciliation and could only be concluded during the conciliation evening of 8.12.
Tisti večer sta bila potrebna kar dva trialoga in dva sestanka delegacije EP in Coreperja preden je ob 23.30 lahko polno steklo delo spravnega odbora.
During that evening two trialogues and two meetings of the EP delegation/Coreper were necessary before the full conciliation committee could be started at 11.30 pm.
Po zelo težavnih pogajanjih je delegaciji Parlamenta uspelo bistveno spremeniti stališče Sveta, nakar je bil dosežen kompromis.
Following very difficult negotiations Parliament's delegation managed to move the position of Council significantly and could therefore accept the compromise reached.
Glavne točke lahko takole povzamemo:
The main points can be summarised as follows:
· Področje uporabe v primeru nacionalnega prevoza: Parlamentu je uspelo, da so v področje uporabe vključene tudi ladje razreda B in ne le ladje razreda A kot v skupnem stališču.
· Scope in case of national carriage: Parliament succeeded in including in the scope also ships of class B and not only of class A as in the common position.
Državam članicam je bila vseeno dana možnost, da uporabo uredbe za ladje razreda B odložijo do konca leta 2018, za ladje razreda A pa za štiri leta od datuma začetka uporabe.
Member States were, however, given the possibility to defer application of the regulation to class B ships until the end of 2018 and for 4 years after the date of application for class A ships.
Komisija mora do leta 2016 v okviru regulativnega postopka s pregledom pripraviti predlog o omejitvah odgovornosti, ki se bodo uporabljale za ladje razreda B.
By 2016 the Commission has to make a proposal, under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, about the liability limits applicable for class B ships.
· Datum začetka uporabe: Zelo očitno je med spravnim postopkom izstopala pravna nejasnost glede datuma začetka uporabe, ki je še dodatni pomen pridobila ob razpravi o prehodnih obdobjih za različne razrede ladij.
· Date of application: The legal uncertainty regarding the date of application was fully realised during conciliation and became very important also because of the debate about transitional periods for the different classes of ships.
Dogovorjeno je bilo, da se uredba začne uporabljati ob začetku veljavnosti atenske konvencije v Skupnosti, a najkasneje 31.
For this reason the Parliament negotiators insisted on a clear and binding date of application.
To je sedaj v besedilu uredbe zapisano v členu 12 in ne le v izjavi Sveta in držav članic, kar je zagovarjal Svet.
This was laid down in the text of the Regulation in Article 12 and not only in a declaration of the Council and the Member States as was the position of Council.
· Omejitev odgovornosti: Parlament je potrdil bistveni del ideje Sveta o globalni meji in uporabi konvencije LLMC 96, ki lahko zniža višino odškodnine žrtvam pod meje iz atenske konvencije.
· Limits of liability: Parliament essentially accepted Council's idea of a global cap by using the LLMC 96 Convention which can reduce the amount of compensation per victim below the ceilings of the Athens convention.
Potrdil je tudi, da se države članice lahko odločijo in zvišajo prag odškodnin iz konvencije LLMC 96.
It also accepted the possibility of Member States to opt-out "to the top" of the LLMC 96 and adopt higher ceilings.
Po drugi strani pa mu je uspelo izposlovati pomembna jamstva za to, da bodo države članice, ki nimajo lastnih predpisov za izvajanje konvencije LLMC, kakor je bila spremenjena s protokolom iz leta 1996 (ki določa višje odškodnine kot predhodna besedila), v celoti uporabile atensko konvencijo.
It managed, however, to obtain important safeguards which ensure that Member States, if they have no national legislation implementing the LLMC as amended by the protocol of 1996 (which provides for higher compensation as its predecessors) have to apply the Athens Convention in full.
Jasno je bila tudi opredeljena možnost omejitve odgovornosti v primeru terorističnih akcij.
The possibility to limit responsibility in case of terrorism was also clarified.
· Predplačilo: Parlamentu je uspelo prepričati Svet, naj sprejme področje uporabe predplačila, kot ga je prvotno predlagala Komisija.
· Advance payment: Parliament could convince Council to accept the scope for the advance payment as initially proposed by the Commission.
· Informiranje potnikov: Določbe o tem vprašanju bodo zdaj precej natančnejše v več smereh.
· Information to passengers: Those provisions were considerably strengthened in several ways.
Glede tega, kdaj je treba potnike informirati, je skupno stališče določalo "najkasneje ob odhodu".
Regarding the point in time of the information of passengers the common position was "at the latest on departure."
Parlament je dosegel pomembno razlikovanje: če je pogodba sklenjena v državi članici, morajo biti informacije posredovane ob prodaji; če je točka odhoda v državi članici, morajo biti informacije posredovane pred odhodom.
Parliament achieved an important differentiation: in case of a contract concluded in a Member State the information has to be provided at the point of sale; in case of a point of departure in a Member State it has to be provided prior to departure.
Samo v vseh drugih primerih se informacije posredujejo "najkasneje ob odhodu".
Only in all other cases shall the information be provided "at the latest on departure."
Natančneje so bile opredeljene tudi minimalne zahteve glede informiranja in obveznosti organizatorjev potovanj.
In addition, the minimum information requirements were better defined and the application of the obligations of tour operators clarified.
Do bistvenega premika v stališču Sveta je prišlo še zlasti na večer dela spravnega odbora: njegovo začetno stališče glede razreda B je bilo, naj prehodno obdobje znaša 12 let, Parlament pa je predlagal 4 leta.
It was in particular during the evening of the conciliation committee that the position of the Council significantly shifted: It's starting position on class B was a transition period of 12 years while the Parliament had proposed 4 years.
Končni dogovor je, da prehodno obdobje za razred B traja do konca leta 2018, kar je 6 let, z datumom začetka uporabe leta 2012.
The final agreement sets the transition period of class B until the end of 2018 which would be a transition period of 6 years when the date of application is in 2012.
Za razreda C in D je Svet predlagal, naj Komisija 15 let po datumu začetka uporabe pripravi poročilo o možni razširitvi uporabe uredbe na razreda C in D.
For classes C and D the Council had proposed a report to be presented by the Commission after 15 years following the date of application considering the extension of the scope to classes C and D. The Parliament had requested a legislative proposal no later than the date of application.
Skupno besedilo Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odgovornosti prevoznikov potnikov po morju v primeru nesreč, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of accidents
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o okrepitvi varnosti in temeljnih svoboščin na internetu
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on strengthening security and fundamental freedoms on the Internet
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU (B6-0302/2008)..............................................................15
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION (B6‑0302/2008)................................................16
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................17
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................21
o okrepitvi varnosti in temeljnih svoboščin na internetu
on strengthening security and fundamental freedoms on the Internet
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga predlaga Stavros Lambrinidis v imenu skupine PSE, o okrepitvi varnosti in temeljnih svoboščin na internetu ( B6-0302/2008 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Stavros Lambrinidis on behalf of the PSE Group on strengthening security and fundamental freedoms on the Internet ( B6-0302/2008 ),
– ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, Konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah
– having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
1. , zlasti njenih določb o varstvu osebnih podatkov, svobodi izražanja, spoštovanju zasebnega in družinskega življenja in pravici do svobode in varnosti,
1. and in particular the provisions thereof relating to the protection of personal data, freedom of expression, respect for private and family life, as well as the right to liberty and security,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov
– having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data,
31. , Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/977/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah
31. to Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters,
UL L 350, 30.12.08, str.
OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p.
60. , Direktive 2003/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2003 o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja
60. to Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information,
UL L 345, 31.12.03, str.
OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p.
UL 2006 L 105, str.
OJ 2006 L 105, p.
54. in sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca z dne 14. oktobra 2008 v zadevi C-301/06 Irska proti Parlamentu in Svetu,
54. and the Advocate General’s Opinion of 14 October 2008 in Case C-301/06 Ireland v Parliament and Council,
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2005/222/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o napadih na informacijske sisteme
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA of 24 February 2005 on attacks against information systems,
UL L 69, 16.03.2005, str.
OJ L 69, 16.3.2005, p.
67. , Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2001/413/PNZ z dne 28. maja 2001 o boju proti goljufijam in ponarejanju v zvezi z negotovinskimi plačilnimi sredstvi
67. to Council Framework Decision 2001/413/JHA of 28 May 2001 on combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment,
UL L 149, 02.06.2001, str.
OJ L 149, 2.6.2001, p.
1. , Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/919/PNZ z dne 28. novembra 2008 o spremembi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/475/PNZ o boju proti terorizmu
1. to Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA of 28 November 2008 amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism,
UL L 330, 09.12.2008, str.
OJ L 330, 9.12.2008, p.
21. , Sporočila Komisije z dne 22. maja 2007 z naslovom „Na poti k splošni politiki o boju proti kibernetskemu kriminalu“ ( KOM(2007)0267 ) ter nedavnih pobud za ugotavljanje hudih kaznivih dejanj in terorizma (kot je projekt za preverjanje medmrežja „Check the Web“),
21. to the Commission's Communication of 22 May 2007 entitled ‘Towards a general policy and the fight against cyber crime’ ( COM(2007)0267 ), as well as to the recent initiatives for the detection of serious crime and terrorism (such as the ‘Check the Web’ project),
- ob upoštevanju dela, ki poteka v Svetu Evrope, Organizaciji za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj ter Organizaciji združenih narodov na področju boja proti kriminalu in kibernetskemu kriminalu in na področju varstva temeljnih pravic in svoboščin tudi na internetu
- having regard to the work undertaken within the framework of the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations (UN), both as concerns the combating of crime and cybercrime and as concerns the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, including on the Internet,
Prim.: Konvencija Sveta Evrope o kibernetski kriminaliteti iz dne 23. novembra 2001 in Konvencija Sveta Evrope za varstvo posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov z dne 28. januarja 1981. ,
Ex.: Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime of 23 November 2001; Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of 28 January 1981.
- ob upoštevanju zadnjih sodb evropskih sodišč in nacionalnih ustavnih sodišč na tem področju, zlasti sodbe nemškega zveznega ustavnega sodišča, ki priznava izrecno pravico do varstva zaupnosti in nedotakljivosti sistemov informacijske tehnologije
- having regard to the most recent judgments of the European courts and national constitutional courts in this field, and in particular the Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court recognising a distinct right to the protection of confidentiality and the integrity of information technology systems,
Nemško zvezno ustavo sodišče, 1 BvR 370/07, 27.2.2008, Odstavek-Št.
BVerfG, 1 BvR 370/07, 27.2.2008, Absatz-Nr.
- ob upoštevanju člena 114(3) in člena 94 svojega poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 114(3) and Rule 94 of its Rules of Procedure,
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0103/2009 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6-0103/2009 ),
A. ker razvoj interneta dokazuje, da ta postaja nujno orodje za spodbujanje demokratičnih pobud, nov forum za politične razprave (na primer e-volilne kampanje in e-volitve), bistven instrument za uveljavljanje svobode izražanja na svetovni ravni (na primer spletni dnevniki) in za razvoj gospodarskih dejavnosti, pa tudi mehanizem za spodbujanje digitalne pismenosti in razširjanje znanja (e-učenje); ker internet prinaša tudi vedno večje število možnosti za ljudi vseh starosti, da lahko denimo komunicirajo z ljudmi iz različnih delov sveta, in je tako razširil ljudem možnosti, da spoznavajo druge kulture ter s tem drugačne ljudi in kulture tudi bolje razumejo; ker se je z internetom povečala tudi raznolikost virov novic, saj posamezniki zdaj lahko spremljajo novice iz različnih delov sveta,
A. whereas the evolution of the Internet proves that it is becoming an indispensable tool for promoting democratic initiatives, a new arena for political debate (for instance e-campaigning and e-voting), a key instrument at world level for exercising freedom of expression (for instance blogging) and for developing business activities, and a mechanism for promoting digital literacy and the dissemination of knowledge (e-learning); whereas the Internet has also brought with it an increasing number of opportunities for people of all ages to communicate with people from different parts of the world, for example, and has thereby expanded the scope for people to familiarise themselves with other cultures and thus enhance their understanding of other people and cultures; whereas the Internet has also extended the diversity of news sources for individuals as they are now able to tap into the flow of news from different parts of the world,
B. ker bi morale vlade in organizacije ter institucije, ki delujejo v javnem interesu, zagotoviti primeren zakonodajni okvir in ustrezna tehnična sredstva, da bi državljanom omogočile dejavno in učinkovito udeležbo v upravnih postopkih z aplikacijami e-uprave,
B. whereas governments and public interest organisations and institutions should provide a suitable regulatory framework and appropriate technical means to allow citizens actively and efficiently to take part in administrative processes through e-government applications,
C. ker internet v celoti ustreza opredelitvi svobode izražanja iz člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti delu, ki pravi „ne glede na državne meje“,
C. whereas the Internet gives full meaning to the definition of freedom of expression enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, especially in terms of its 'regardless of frontiers' dimension,
D. ker bi preglednost, spoštovanje zasebnosti in okolje, kjer vlada zaupanje med zainteresiranimi stranmi, morali veljati za nujne elementi pri oblikovanju trajnostnega varnostnega koncepta interneta,
D. whereas transparency, respect for privacy and an environment of trust amongst I-stakeholders should be considered indispensable elements in order to build a sustainable security vision for the Internet,
E. ker sta svoboda izražanja in zasebnost na internetu lahko večji, hkrati pa tudi bolj izpostavljeni vdorom in omejitvam, tako s strani zasebnih kot javnih akterjev,
E. whereas on the Internet, freedom of expression and privacy can at the same time be both better enhanced and more exposed to intrusions and limitations by both private and public actors,
F. ker se internet, zaradi svobode, ki jo zagotavlja, mnogokrat uporablja tudi za širjenje nasilnih sporočil, kot so bila tista, ki so namenoma spodbujala k terorističnim napadom, ter za spletne strani, ki lahko posebej spodbujajo kazniva dejanja iz sovraštva, in ker se je po vsem svetu povečala nevarnost računalniškega kriminala, ki ogroža posameznike (tudi otroke) in omrežja,
F. whereas, through the freedom that it provides, the Internet has also been used as a platform for violent messages such as the ones intentionally inciting terrorist attacks, as well as for websites which can specifically incite hate-based criminal acts, and whereas cybercrime threats more broadly have increased worldwide and are endangering individuals (including children) and networks,
G. ker se je treba učinkovito in odločno zoperstaviti tovrstnemu kriminalu, brez spreminjanja temeljne svobodne in odprte narave interneta,
G. whereas these crimes must be countered effectively and decisively, without altering the fundamental free and open nature of the Internet,
H. ker so v demokratični družbi državljani upravičeni do tega, da neprestano opazujejo in presojajo dejanja in prepričanja svojih vlad in zasebnih podjetji, ki jim nudijo storitve; ker to načelo vedno bolj ogrožajo tehnološko napredne tehnike nadzorovanja, ki včasih sovpadajo z odsotnostjo ustreznih pravnih jamstev glede omejevanja njihove uporabe,
H. whereas, in a democratic society, it is the citizens who are entitled to observe and to judge daily the actions and beliefs of their governments and of private companies that provide them with services; whereas technologically advanced surveillance techniques, sometimes coupled with the absence of adequate legal guarantees regarding the limits of their application, increasingly threaten this principle,