natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Direkitva Sveta 85/337/EGS z dne 27. junija 1985 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje (UL L 175, 5.7.1985, str.
Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
40). , težav lokalnih skupnosti v Limericku in druge problematike, izpostavljene v času obiska za ugotavljanje dejstev na Irskem
40). , the problems faced by local communities in Limerick, and other issues raised in the report of the fact-finding visit to Ireland
DT 689062. , ki ga je odbor za peticije izvedel leta 2007; ugotavlja, da za nekatera od naštetih vprašanj poteka postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev;
DT 689062. conducted by the Committee on Petitions in 2007; notes that some of these issues are the subject of ongoing infringement procedures;
29. ugotavlja, da odbor za peticije prejema vedno več peticij in pisem o skrajno občutljivem vprašanju skrbništva nad otroki, pri katerem je izredno težko ukrepati, kot na primer pri peticijah v zvezi z nemškim Jugendamtom , ker so v številnih primerih vpletena sodišča ter EU, razen če sta starša iz dveh različnih držav članic, težko uveljavlja svoje pristojnosti;
Notes the growing number of petitions and letters received by the Committee on Petitions concerning the most sensitive matter of child custody, on which it is extremely difficult to take action, as for instance in the case of petitions concerning the German Jugendamt, because of the involvement of the courts in many cases, and because of the fact that – except in cases of parents from different EU countries – it is difficult to claim competence for the EU as such;
32. obžaluje, da med peticijami, ki so v obravnavi najdlje, ostaja nerešen zadeve „Lettori“ v zvezi z učitelji tujih jezikov v Italiji, kljub dvema odločbama Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in podpori, ki sta jo njihovemu primeru in pritožbam dala Komisija ter odbor za peticije; poziva italijanske organe in posamezne vpletene univerze, tudi v Genovi, Padovi, Neaplju in drugje, naj ukrepajo in zagotovijo, da bo tem legitimnim zahtevam pravično ugodeno;
Deplores the fact that, among the oldest outstanding petitions still being worked upon, the case of the "Lettori", the foreign language teachers in Italy, continues to be unresolved despite two decisions by the Court of Justice and the support of the Commission and the Committee on Petitions for their case and their grievances; urges the Italian authorities and the individual universities involved, including inter alia those of Genoa, Padua and Naples, to act to apply a just solution to these legitimate claims;
34. namerava za naslednje zakonodajno obdobje ponovno preučiti ime odbora za peticije, ki se prevaja v vse uradne jezike EU, da bi bila narava odbora iz njega popolnoma razumljiva, kar za zdaj v nekaterih jezikih očitno ne velja, in da bi podkrepil participativno demokracijo v pravici do peticije; predlaga naziv „odbor za peticije državljanov“, ki bi bil morda razumljivejši;
Resolves to review the name of the Committee on Petitions, as translated into all EU official languages, for the next legislative term, so as to ensure that the name communicates the nature of the Committee in a comprehensible manner, as this is apparently not the case in certain languages at the moment, and so as to underline the element of participatory democracy in the right of petition; suggests that the term "Committee on Citizens' Petitions" may be more easily understandable;
36. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in poročilo odbora za peticije posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, vladam in parlamentom držav članic in njihovim odborom za peticije ter varuhom človekovih pravic oziroma podobnim pristojnim organom.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of the Committee on Petitions to the Council, the Commission, the European Ombudsman, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, their committees on petitions and their ombudsmen or similar competent bodies.
Delo odbora za peticije in njegov vpliv na številne evropske državljane sta bila leta 2007 še vedno v središču širokega zanimanja medijev.
The work of the Committee on Petitions, and the impact it has had on many European citizens, continued to be the focus of widespread coverage in the press during 2007.
Čeprav imajo drugi odbori odgovornost parlamentarne zakonodajne dejavnosti, ki je naravna prednostna naloga te ustanove, je tudi odbor za peticije dokazal, da je njegova vloga bistvenega pomena, saj lahko preučuje in poroča, kako je evropska zakonodaja sprejeta v državah članicah.
Compared to the other Committees who have the heavy responsibility of Parliament's legislative activity which remains the natural priority of the institution, the Committee on Petitions has nevertheless demonstrated that its role and function is also essential, given its ability to investigate and report on how European laws are perceived in the Member States.
Z odzivanjem na legitimne skrbi državljanov EU, s posredovanjem njihovih odzivov drugim parlamentarnim odborom in Komisiji, s poskusi za rešitev nesprejemljivih kršitev državljanskih pravic in z izpraševanjem nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih organov, kako uporabljajo pravo EU, je odgovornost tega odbora velika in še narašča.
By responding to the legitimate concerns of EU citizens, by communicating their reactions to other Parliamentary Committees and to the Commission, by working to resolve unacceptable infringements of citizens rights and by questioning national, regional and local authorities about the way they apply EU law the Committee has a large and growing responsibility.
Poleg tega je Parlament s sodelovanjem številnih vlagateljev peticij pri delovanju odbora pokazal, da je lahko proaktivno dovzeten za evropsko volilno telo – leta 2007 je 159 vlagateljev peticij govorilo in dejavno sodelovalo na sejah odbora, srečal pa se je tudi s stotinami drugih v njihovi domači regiji med šestimi obiski za ugotavljanje dejstev, izvedenimi lansko leto.
Moreover, by involving many petitioners in the activity of the Committee - 159 petitioners spoke and actively participated in Committee meetings in 2007, hundreds more were met in their own region during the six fact-finding visits conducted in 2007, the Parliament itself has shown how it is able to be receptive on a pro-active basis to the European electorate.
Konferenca predsednikov je januarja 2007 sklenila povečati odbor za peticije s 25 na 40 članov (odbor je v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2005, o katerem so glasovali leta 2006, zaprosil za 50 članov), tako da je vanj lahko prišlo več poslancev iz novih držav članic.
In January 2007, the Conference of Presidents agreed to increase the size of the Committee to 40 members (the Committee had asked for 50 in its Annual Report for 2005, voted in 2006) and this increase, from 25, has opened up the Committee to more members from more Member States.
Še vedno pa v njem manjka članov iz pomembnih držav, kar v mnogočem nima negativnih posledic za državljane EU, saj lahko izvoljeni poslanec iz ene države v Evropskem parlamentu legitimno zastopa pravice državljana iz druge države.
In many ways this does not have any real negative effect on EU citizens as an elected member from one national constituency can legitimately defend the rights of a citizen from another country within the European Parliament.
Vendar to v nekem smislu zahteva pozornost tako pri posameznih poslancih kot pri njihovih političnih skupinah.
However, in terms of perception, this does require some attention by both individual MEPs and their political groups.
Številni poslanci, ki niso člani tega odbora, se kljub temu pogosto udeležijo njegovih sej, kadar jih zadevajo vprašanja, ki so jih postavili njihovi volivci, vendar bržkone nimajo dostopa do vsega gradiva ali ne poznajo postopkov, te pa je – če naj bodo učinkoviti –treba razumeti tako kot v vseh drugih odborih.
Many MEPs who are not members of the Committee frequently attend the Committee anyway when issues concerning their constituents affect them, but they are unlikely to have access to all background material or to be aware of the procedures, which as for any Committee, need to be understood to be effective.
Glede dostopa do informacij se je leta 2007 zgodil pravi preobrat.
In terms of access to information, the year 2007 marks a real turning point.
Jeseni je bil vsem članom odbora in njihovim namestnikom, pa tudi osebju skupine, omogočen dostop do nove zbirke podatkov in sistema za obdelavo elektronskega vlaganja peticij.
In the autumn the new e-Petitions data base and management system became available to all members and substitute members of the Committee as well as to group staff.
Ta omogoča takojšen spletni dostop prek intraneta do vseh dokumentov, povezanih s posameznimi prejetimi peticijami, pa tudi drugih informacij, ki lahko poslancem in njihovim pomočnikom koristijo pri delu.
This provides immediate on-line access (through the intranet) to all documents pertaining to each petition received as well as other linked information useful for members and their assistants as they prepare their work.
V načrtu je še nadaljnji razvoj in razširitev na internet, vendar je pomanjkanje proračunskih sredstev upočasnilo to pomembno razvijanje storitev za državljane.
Further developments are planned as well as an extension of the internet, but the lack of budgetary resources allocated has slowed down this essential development of service to citizens.
Odtlej narašča število vlagateljev, ki peticijo vložijo elektronsko prek spletne strani Parlamenta.
The number of petitioners who submit their petitions electronically through the Parliament web-site has continued to increase in 2007.
Na ta način je bilo oddanih 42 % prejetih peticij.
42% of petitions received were communicated in this way.
Velik delež jih je bilo žal nedopustnih, številne so bile zelo kratke in nejasne, to pa otežuje zmožnost odbora, da bi posamezniku resnično pomagal.
However, a larger proportion of these were inadmissible and too many were very short and imprecise and this undermines the Committees ability to provide any real remedy or assistance to the person's concerned.
Od 1506 peticij, prejetih leta 2007 – polovico več kot leto poprej – jih je bilo 34,9 % nedopustnih, o čemer so bili vlagatelji tudi obveščeni: pogosto so dobili pisni nasvet, na katere nacionalne naslove se lahko obrnejo v zvezi s svojimi težavami.
Of the 1506 petitions received in 2007, - fifty per cent more than in 2006 - 34.9% were inadmissible and the petitioners informed accordingly; often with a letter advising them of possible national channels for their concerns.
Naj pogostejši vzrok nedopustnosti je bilo vprašanje pristojnosti in subsidiarnosti.
The largest cause of inadmissibility relates to the question of competence and its corollary, subsidiarity.
Ostaja dejstvo, da je odbor okoli dve tretjini peticij leta 2007 označil za dopustne po členu 191 poslovnika Parlamenta, po katerem ima vsak državljan Evropske unije (ali prebivalec) pravico, da na Parlament naslovi peticijo glede vprašanj, ki sodijo na področje delovanja Evropske unije in ki ga oziroma jo neposredno zadevajo.
The fact remains that about two-thirds of petitions received in 2007 were deemed admissible by the Committee under Rule 191 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure, according to which "Any citizen of the European Union...(or resident).shall have the right to petition the Parliament on a matter which comes within the European Union's fields of activity and which concerns him or her or it (- an association -) directly".
Ta določba je prevzeta iz člena 194 Pogodbe o EU.
This rule is taken from 194 of the EU Treaty.
Tabela prikazuje število peticij po državah : (države z manj kot 10 peticijami niso navedene):
The table shows the number of petitions concerning the following countries: (countries not mentioned score less than 10)
PREJETE PETICIJE
Petitions received
Združeno kraljestvo + Gib.
United Kingdom + Gib.
Peticij o Evropski uniji kot celoti je bilo 216.
Petitions concerning the European Union as a whole numbered 216.
Tabela je v pomoč, deloma pa je tudi zavajajoča glede preiskav odbora, saj bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi glavne teme delovanja.
The above table is helpful and yet also to a certain extent misleading regarding the Committees investigations for which the main themes of activity should also be considered.
Najpogostejših deset tem v peticijah leta 2007:
The top-ten general themes covered by the petitions received in 2007 are as follows:
Okoljska vprašanja, voda itd.
Environmental issues, water, etc
288 (od tega 104 iz Španije)
288 (of which 104 from Spain)
Socialne zadeve in diskriminacija
Social Affairs & Discrimination
Notranji trg in potrošniki
Internal Market & Consumers
Prometne zadeve in infrastruktura
Transport issues & Infrastructure
Izobraževanje in kultura
Education & cultural issues
Mnoge od teh tem so povezane, pri vprašanjih prometa se na primer sprožijo tudi okoljska vprašanja.
Many of these themes are related as, for example certain transport issues will also be concerned with environmental questions.
V tem poročilu so navedene kot okvirni vodnik o najrazličnejših temah, ki jih obravnava odbor za peticije, pogosto v sodelovanju z drugimi pristojnimi odbori.
They are intended in the context of this report as an indicative guide to the very wide range of issues dealt with by the Committee, very often in cooperation with other competent committees in the Parliament.
Iz dela odbora leta 2007 in ob upoštevanju navedene statistike je razvidno, da so evropski državljani zaskrbljeni predvsem zaradi svojega okolja in narave, ki jih obdaja, in da se vse pogosteje obračajo na Evropski parlament pri boju proti zlorabam, ki ogrožajo njihov način življenja in njihovo lastnino.
What does emerge from the work of the Committee in 2007, bearing in mind the statistics outlined above, is that European citizens are predominantly concerned with their environment and their natural surroundings and that they are increasingly turning to the European Parliament as a means of fighting abuses which they see threatening their lives and their property.
Povedati je treba, da sprejeta zakonodaja EU pogosto ni dovolj, da bi zaščitila okolje in pogosto ne izpolni svojega namena.
It has to be said that frequently the EU laws which have been put in place are very often not powerful enough to protect the environment; they fail to correspond to their objectives.
Presoja vpliva direktive na okolje je eden od primerov, ko v bistvu proceduralna direktiva nima nikakršnega vpliva pri preprečevanju obsežnih infrastrukturnih projektov – ravno nasprotno od tistega, kar pričakujejo vlagatelji peticij in evropski državljani.
The Directive on Environmental Impact Assessment is but one example where an essentially procedural directive may ultimately have no effect on preventing massive infrastructure projects; contrary to what many petitioners and European citizens expect.
Direktivo o habitatih, po kateri so v državah članicah oblikovali območja Natura 2000 za varstvo biološke raznovrstnosti, pogosto kršijo zaradi ekonomskih interesov domnevno večjega pomena.
The Habitats Directive, which is responsible for the designation of Natura 2000 sites to protect bio-diversity in member states, is frequently violated for reasons of supposedly overriding economic interests.
Direktive o odlaganju odpadkov so povsem zvodenele, tako da ko se lokalni organ odloči za gradnjo novega odlagališča odpadkov 40 metrov od šol in hiš, evropski državljani ugotovijo, da so premalo zaščiteni.
The Landfill Directives are so watered down that European citizens are discovering that they afford totally inadequate protection when a local authority decides to build a new landfill 40 metres away from schools and houses.
Končni rezultat je seveda veliko evropskih državljanov v stiski in uničeno okolje.
The end result of this is of course a lot of very frustrated European citizens and a degraded environment.
Evropski parlament kot sozakonodajalec za to tematiko se mora zavedati, da je potrebne še veliko pravne revizije, preden bo okoljska zakonodaja EU izpolnila pričakovanja volilnega telesa, v nekaterih primerih pa celo cilje veljavne zakonodaje.
The European Parliament as co-legislator on such issues must realise that there is a lot of legislative revision which needs to be done before EU Environment law meets the expectations of the EU electorate, and in some cases, even meets the objectives contained in existing laws.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je res odločilo, da mora biti vsebina zakonodaje EU sorazmerna z njenimi cilji, vendar je pot do Sodišča za večino evropskih državljanov še vedno predolga in prezapletena, v postopku vlaganja peticije pa, čeprav je do neke mere vendarle učinkovit, ni dejanske sodne pristojnosti, če pride do težav.
It is true that the European Court of Justice has ruled that the contents of EU laws must be commensurate with their objectives; however the road to the Court of Justice remains too long and too winding for most European citizens and the petitions process, though effective up to a point, does not have the real power of a court when it comes to the crunch.
Vse to je državam članicam le v korist.
This is all to the member states' advantage.
Temeljne pravice državljanov so seveda v ospredju delovanja odbora za peticije.
The Fundamental Rights of citizens are also naturally to the forefront of the Committee's work.
Po drugi strani pa odbor, in tudi Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 21. junija 2007, menita, da mora takšne pravice braniti, če jih ogrožajo nepremičninska podjetja ali kdo drug.
The Committee, and the Parliament in its resolution of June 21st 2007, on the other hand believes that it must defend such rights when they are threatened by property developers or anyone else.
Naslednje vprašanje, povezano s pravicami državljanov, zapisanimi v listini, so sprožili številni ljudje, ki trdijo, da nemška agencija za zaščito otrok Jugendamt po razvezi staršev iz dveh držav ali prekinitvi njune življenjske skupnosti sprejema preveč samovoljnih in diskriminatornih odločitev, pogosto na škodo otrok – pri čemer je nemški državljan v boljšem položaju, drugi, državljan tretje države, na primer Poljske, Francije ali Belgije, pa je v slabšem položaju.
Another issue related to the question of the rights of the citizen as contained in the Charter has been raised by a very large number of people who allege that the German child protection agency - the Jugendamt , in fact takes too many arbitrary and discriminatory decisions to the detriment of the child in many cases, following the separation or divorce of their bi-national parents - one being from Germany who obtains advantage, the other being from a third country such as Poland, France, Belgium who appears to be the victim.
Enemu od vlagateljev peticije iz Poljske so se lani nemški organi po preučitvi peticije opravičili.
One petitioner from Poland received an apology from the German authorities last year having had his petition investigated.
Vendar odbor kljub razpravam v Berlinu marca 2007 in kasnejšem dopisovanju z nemškimi oblastmi še vedno ne more dati splošne ocene.
However, in spite of discussions in Berlin in March 2007 and subsequent communication with the German authorities the Committee is not yet in a position to formulate a general assessment.
Vsak primer je drugačen, vsi so močno čustveno nabiti; nekateri so bili že v sodnem postopku, drugi nanj še čakajo.
Each case is different, emotionally they are all very highly charged; some have been through the courts and others cases are pending.
O dopustnosti tovrstnih peticij je treba presojati previdno, saj se EU in z njo odbor za peticije po Pogodbi ne sme vmešavati v zadeve, za katere so pristojne države članice – v tem primeru nemški okrožni organi.
The admissibility of such petitions also need to be carefully assessed because under the Treaty the EU - and therefore the Committee on Petitions, should not become involved in issues which are the competence of the member states - in this case district authorities in Germany.
Pri posameznih težavnih zadevah gre za vprašanje diskriminacije na podlagi jezika in/ali narodnosti, saj so staršem med obiski prepovedali z otroki govoriti v svojem jeziku.
The individual cases which have been heard deal with the question of discrimination based upon language and/or nationality where parents have been denied the right to speak to their children during custody visits in the own language.
V zvezi s pravicami evropskih državljanov je odbor razpravljal tudi o položaju rusko govoreče manjšine v Latviji, ki je več kot četrtina prebivalstva.
Also in relation to the rights of European citizens, the Committee also discussed the situation of the Russian speaking minority in Latvia which constitute more than one quarter of the population.
Iz prejetih peticij je razvidno, da čeprav so na voljo postopki za pridobitev polnopravnega latvijskega državljanstva, številni državljani še naprej doživljajo diskriminatorno ravnanje glede svojih državljanskih pravic in svobode gibanja.
From the petitions received it has emerged that, even though there are procedures in place for obtaining full Latvian nationality, many citizens continue to suffer from discriminatory practices in terms of their civic rights and their freedom of movement.
Odbor je med svojimi sejami poslušal tako vlagatelje peticije kot latvijske organe.
The Committee has heard from both petitioners and from the Latvian authorities during the course of its meetings.
O tem vprašanju še vedno ni zavzel dokončnega stališča, vendar je latvijske organe spodbudil, naj še bolj razvijejo naturalizacijski program in končajo diskriminacijo proti številnim prebivalcem, ki so pogostoma priseljenci sovjetskega izvora druge ali tretje generacije.
It has not yet taken a final position on the matter but it has encouraged the Latvian authorities to further develop the naturalisation programme and end the discrimination against many people who are often second or third generation immigrants from original Soviet parentage.
Obisk odbora za ugotavljanje dejstev, ki so ga opravili po dva ali trije poslanci in osebje, so se pokazali kot zelo koristni tako za institucijo (zaradi svojega profila in majhnih stroškov za davkoplačevalce) kot za vlagatelje peticij.
The fact-finding visits of the Committee, involving two or three members and staff, have proved to be of great value both for the institution (in terms of profile and because of their low cost to the taxpayer) and for the petitioners who are the beneficiaries of such visits.
O programu in ciljih vsakokratnega obiska se vnaprej razpravlja in doseže soglasje, poročilo pa se pripravi takoj po vrnitvi delegacije in se pisno predloži na naslednji seji odbora, kjer se razpravlja o obisku ter se takoj sprejmejo in potrdijo priporočila.
The programme and objectives of each visit are discussed and agreed upon in advance and a report is prepared immediately the delegation returns and submitted in writing to the next Committee meeting where the visit is discussed and recommendations agreed upon and approved.
Na ta način je mogoče pripraviti srečanja z vlagatelji, pristojnimi organi in drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi v zadevni regiji, poslanci pa dobijo jasnejšo sliko o posameznih vprašanjih.
In this way, meetings are able to take place with petitioners and the responsible authorities and other interested parties in the region concerned, and members are able to obtain a much clearer understanding of the subject at issue.