natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· in ali sta člena 43(2) in 349 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) lahko skupna pravna podlaga za dani zakonodajni postopek, saj omogočata uporabo različnih zakonodajnih postopkov.
· and whether Articles 43(2) and 349 TFEU can be adopted as a joint legal basis for a given legislative procedure as they provide for the application of different legislative procedures.
Uredba določa sistem dovoljenj, ki ga je treba vzpostaviti na nacionalni ravni.
The Regulation provides for a permit system to be established at national level.
V skladu s členom 2(7) uredbe se bodo lahko na podlagi novih znanstvenih dognanj in mnenj vnosi in prenosi za uporabo v zaprtih ribogojskih objektih v prihodnosti izvzeli iz zahteve za pridobitev dovoljenja iz poglavja III uredbe.
According to Article 2(7) of the Regulation, introductions and translocations for use in "closed aquaculture facilities" may at a future date be exempted from the permit requirement of Chapter III of the regulation, in the light of new scientific information and advice.
Iz šestega okvirnega programa je bil financiran usklajeni ukrep „Vplivi tujih vrst v ribogojstvu na okolje“ (projekt IMPASSE).
Under the Sixth Framework Programme, a concerted action was funded with the title "Environmental impacts of alien species in aquaculture" (the IMPASSE project).
Njegov splošni cilj je bil razvoj smernic za dobre okoljske prakse glede vnosov in prenosov v ribogojstvu.
Its overall goal was to develop guidelines for environmentally sound practices for introductions and translocations in aquaculture.
Poleg tega naj bi se posebna pozornost namenila presoji, ali bi bilo mogoče sodobne kopenske zaprte ribogojske objekte šteti za biološko varne in koliko je mogoče premike v te objekte razlikovati od premikov v odprte ribogojske objekte v skladu s pravili Skupnosti.
In addition, special attention would be given to assessing whether modern land-based closed aquaculture facilities could be considered biosecure and to what extent movements into these facilities can be differentiated from movements into open aquaculture facilities under Community rules.
V nedavno predloženem končnem poročilu o projektu IMPASSE je podana operativna opredelitev zaprtih ribogojskih objektov, ki je podrobnejša in strožja od sedanje v členu 3(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 708/2007.
The recently submitted final report on the IMPASSE project has delivered an operational definition of "closed aquaculture facilities" which is more detailed and stricter than the current definition given by Article 3(3) of Council Regulation No 708/2007.
Namen tega predloga je opraviti potrebne tehnične spremembe opredelitve zaprtega ribogojskega objekta za izvzetje vnosov in prenosov za uporabo v takih objektih iz zahteve za pridobitev dovoljenja iz poglavja III Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 708/2007.
The objective of the proposal is to make the necessary technical changes to the definition of "closed aquaculture facility" in order to exempt introductions and translocations for use in such facilities from the permit requirement of Chapter III of Council Regulation No 708/2007.
Njegov namen je odpraviti upravne postopke in obenem zagotoviti ustrezno varstvo okolja pri uporabi tujih ali lokalno neprisotnih vrst v ribogojstvu.
The aim is to remove red tape while ensuring adequate environmental protection in the use of alien and locally absent species in aquaculture.
Predlagani pravni podlagi
The proposed legal bases
Predlagani pravni podlagi za predlog uredbe sta:
The legal bases which have been put forward for the proposed regulation are as follows:
Člen 43(2) PDEU.
Article 43(2) TFEU
Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku in po posvetovanju z Ekonomsko-socialnim odborom določita skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov iz člena 40(1) in druge določbe, potrebne za doseganje ciljev skupne kmetijske in ribiške politike.
The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, shall establish the common organisation of agricultural markets provided for in Article 40(1) and the other provisions necessary for the pursuit of the objectives of the common agricultural policy and the common fisheries policy.
To je edina pravna podlaga, ki jo je predlagal Svet.
This is the sole legal basis put forward by the Council.
Člen 349 PDEU
Article 349 TFEU
Ob upoštevanju strukturno pogojenih socialnih in gospodarskih razmer Guadeloupa, Francoske Gvajane, Martinika, Reuniona, Saint-Barthélemyja, Saint-Martina, Azorov, Madeire in Kanarskih otokov, katerih razvoj zaradi svoje stalnosti in součinkovanja močno otežujejo dejavniki, kot so oddaljenost, otoška lega, majhnost, težavna topografija in podnebje ter ekonomska odvisnost od maloštevilnih proizvodov, sprejme Svet na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom posebne ukrepe, ki so zlasti namenjeni opredelitvi pogojev uporabe Pogodb za te regije, vključno s skupnimi politikami.
Taking account of the structural social and economic situation of Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, Saint-Barthélemy, Saint-Martin, the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands, which is compounded by their remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate, economic dependence on a few products, the permanence and combination of which severely restrain their development, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, shall adopt specific measures aimed, in particular, at laying down the conditions of application of the Treaties to those regions, including common policies.
Kadar Svet zadevne posebne ukrepe sprejme po posebnem zakonodajnem postopku, prav tako odloča na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
Where the specific measures in question are adopted by the Council in accordance with a special legislative procedure, it shall also act on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament.
Ukrepi iz prvega odstavka se nanašajo zlasti na področja, kot so carinska in trgovinska politika, davčna politika, prostotrgovinske cone, kmetijska in ribiška politika, pogoji za preskrbo s surovinami in bistvenimi izdelki za široko porabo, državne pomoči ter pogoji dostopa do strukturnih skladov in horizontalnih programov Unije.
The measures referred to in the first paragraph concern in particular areas such as customs and trade policies, fiscal policy, free zones, agriculture and fisheries policies, conditions for supply of raw materials and essential consumer goods, State aids and conditions of access to structural funds and to horizontal Union programmes.
Svet sprejme ukrepe iz prvega pododstavka ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti in omejitev najbolj oddaljenih regij, ne da bi s tem ogrozil celovitost in povezanost pravnega reda Unije, vključno z notranjim trgom in skupnimi politikami.
The Council shall adopt the measures referred to in the first paragraph taking into account the special characteristics and constraints of the outermost regions without undermining the integrity and the coherence of the Union legal order, including the internal market and common policies.
To je druga pravna podlaga za Uredbo št. 708/2007, ki jo zagovarja Komisija.
This is the second legal basis for the Regulation No 708/2007 as advocated by the Commission.
Sodna praksa
The case-law
Iz ustaljene sodne prakse izhaja, da mora izbira pravne podlage akta Skupnosti temeljiti na objektivnih dejstvih, ki jih je mogoče sodno preskusiti, kar zlasti velja za cilj in vsebino ukrepa
It is settled case-law that the choice of legal basis for a Community measure must rest on objective factors amenable to judicial review, which include in particular the aim and content of the measure
Zadeva C-440/05 Komisija proti Svetu, Zbirka odločb 2007 I-9097. .
Case C-440/ 05 Commission v. Council [2007] ECR I-9097. .
Načeloma imajo ukrepi samo eno pravno podlago.
In principle, a measure is to be founded on only one legal basis.
Če se pri pregledu namena in vsebine ukrepa Skupnosti izkaže, da ima dvojni cilj, ali če ima dve sestavini, tako da spada v področje uporabe dveh različnih pravnih podlag, pri čemer je ena glavna ali prevladujoča, druga pa zgolj stranska, mora akt temeljiti na samo eni pravni podlagi, in sicer na tisti, ki se zahteva za glavni ali prevladujoči cilj oziroma sestavino
If examination of the aim and the content of a Community measure reveals that it pursues a twofold purpose or that it has a twofold component, falling within the scope of different legal bases, and if one is identifiable as the main or predominant purpose or component, whereas the other is merely incidental, the measure must be based on a single legal basis, namely that required by the main or predominant purpose or component
Zadeva C-91/05 Komisija proti Svetu, Zbirka odločb 2008 I-3651. .
Case C-91/05 Commission v. Council [2008] ECR I-3651. .
Izjemoma, če se ugotovi, da ima akt hkrati več ciljev ali sestavin, ki so neločljivo povezane in med njimi nobena ni drugotnega ali posrednega pomena glede na druge, mora tak akt temeljiti na ustreznih različnih pravnih podlagah, pod pogojem, da so zadevni postopki med seboj skladni
Only if, exceptionally, it is established that the measure simultaneously pursues a number of objectives or has several components that are indissociably linked, without one being secondary and indirect in relation to the other, will that measure have to be founded on the various corresponding legal bases, insofar as their procedures are compatible
Zadeva C-338/01 Komisija proti Svetu, Zbirka odločb 2004 I-4829. .
Case C-338/01 Commission v. Council [2004] ECR I-4829. .
Uporaba dvojne pravne podlage ni mogoča, kadar so postopki, določeni za vsako pravno podlago, med seboj neskladni (opozoriti je treba, da čeprav člen 349 omogoča posvetovanje s Parlamentom, ne omogoča glasovanja s kvalificirano večino v Svetu)
Recourse to a dual legal basis is not possible where the procedures laid down for each legal basis are incompatible with each other (it is noted in this connection that whereas Article 349 provides for mere consultation of Parliament, it does not provide for qualified majority voting in the Council)
Zadeva C-178/03, Komisija proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, Zbirka odločb 2006 I-107. .
Case C-178/03 Commission v. Parliament and Council [2006] ECR I-107. .
Analiza Uredbe št. 708/2007 in predloga za spremembo uredbe
Analysis of Regulation No 708/2007 and the proposal for an amending regulation
Uredba ustvarja sistem, po katerem se lahko vnos ali prenos tujih ali lokalno nenavzočih vrst (dalje tujih vrst) v okolja Skupnosti ureja tako, da ekonomska korist od izkoriščanja teh vrst v ribogojstvu ne škodi biotski raznovrstnosti ali drugim okoljskim dobrinam.
The Regulation creates a system whereby the introduction or translocation of alien or locally absent species (hereinafter "alien species") into Community environments can be regulated in such a way that the economic benefit of exploiting these species through aquaculture does not come at the expense of biodiversity and other environmental goods.
V uredbi je to doseženo z oblikovanjem sistema, ki omogoča znanstveno oceno tveganj, povezanih s pretokom blaga, v državi članici prejemnici.
The Regulation achieves this by establishing a permit system which provides for the scientific assessment of the risks associated with a movement by the receiving Member State.
Poleg tega določa postopke za pretok, za katerega so bila že podeljena dovoljenja.
It goes on to prescribe procedures for movements which have gained permission.
Ta predlog je v bistvu tehnična prilagoditev opisanemu sistemu.
The proposal is essentially a technical adjustment to this system.
Podrobneje opredeljuje zaprti ribogojski objekt in določa izvzetje, ko se tuja vrsta lahko vnese v te biološko varne objekte brez stroškov in upravnih obremenitev zaradi prošenj za dovoljenje.
It gives a more comprehensive definition of "closed aquaculture facility" and goes on to set up an exemption whereby alien species can be introduced into these biologically secure facilities without the cost and administrative burden of permit applications.
Pravna podlaga prvotne uredbe so členi ustanovnih pogodb z zelo različnim področjem uporabe, se pa vsi nanašajo na skupno kmetijsko in ribiško politiko.
The legal bases of the original regulation are treaty articles of very different scope which share a reference to common agricultural and fisheries policies.
Člen 43(2) PDEU omogoča ukrepe, potrebne za oblikovanje evropskega skupnega kmetijskega in ribiškega trga.
Article 43(2) TFEU mandates measures necessary to establish the Europe-wide common agricultural and fisheries markets.
Člen 349 je določnejši – namenjen je izključno najbolj oddaljenim regijam Unije, ki se srečujejo s posebnimi gospodarskimi in socialnimi problemi.
Article 349 is a far more particular provision, aimed exclusively at the Union's most remote island regions, which have particular economic and social problems.
Omeniti je treba, da so najbolj oddaljene regije v uredbi samo bežno omenjene.
It is noteworthy that the Regulation makes only brief reference to the outermost regions.
V členu 2(5) so izvzete vrste (navedene v prilogi IV), ki so bile nekoč tuje, sčasoma pa so postale brez škode navzoče v Skupnosti, tako da ne veljajo več za tuje.
Article 2(5) establishes an exemption for species (listed in Annex 4) which may once have been considered alien but which, due to the length of time they have been present in the Community without any adverse environmental effects, are no longer so considered.
V členu 24 je predviden proces, izveden po pravilih, ki jih mora sprejeti Komisija, ko lahko države članice zaprosijo, da se v prilogo IV dodajo ribje vrste.
Article 24 envisages a process, conducted along the lines of rules to be adopted by the Commission, whereby Member States can apply to have species of fish added to Annex IV.
Člen 24(6) določa:
Article 24(6) provides that:
Zadevne države članice lahko za svoje najbolj oddaljene regije, kot so opredeljene v členu 299(2) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti [zdaj člen 349 PDEU], predlagajo vključitev vrst v posebni del Priloge IV.
Member States concerned may propose in respect of their outermost regions, as referred to in Article 299(2 ) of the Treaty establishing the European Community [now Article 349 TFEU], the addition of species to be included in a separate part of Annex IV.
Namen te določbe je jasen, ne bi pa mogli reči, da gre za „posebne ukrepe, ki so zlasti namenjeni opredelitvi pogojev uporabe Pogodb za te regije“ v smislu člena 349 PDEU.
The purpose is this provision is clear, but it can be hardly regarded as constituting "specific measures aimed, in particular, at laying down the conditions of application of the Treaties to those regions" within the meaning of Article 349 TFEU.
Poleg tega v uvodnih izjavah uredbe ali v kasnejši uredbi za spremembo niso nikjer navedene oddaljene otoške regije, navedene v členu 349.
Moreover, there is no reference whatsoever in the recitals to the Regulation or in the subsequent amending regulation to the remote island regions referred to in Article 349.
Predlog Komisije niti v obrazložitvenem memorandumu niti v preambuli ne ponuja razloga za uporabo druge pravne podlage k predlagani uredbi za spremembo.
Furthermore, the Commission's proposal provides no justification for recourse to the second legal basis either in the explanatory memorandum or in the preamble to the proposed amending regulation.
V sodni praksi Sodišča, ki obravnava izbiro ustrezne pravne podlage, je govora o tem, da je treba najti „težišče“ zakonodajnega ukrepa.
The Court's case-law dealing with the choice of appropriate legal basis speaks of the exercise as one of finding the "centre of gravity" of the legislative measure.
Ni dvoma, da je težišče te uredbe na področju, ki spada v člen 43(2) PDEU.
There is no question that the centre of gravity of the regulation lies in the field covered by Article 43(2) TEU.
Kot je pravna služba pravilno ugotovila, predlog obravnava samo vprašanja spodbujanja ribogojstva.
As the Legal Service has rightly pointed out "the proposal only deals with matters related to the promotion of aquaculture".
Zaključna ugotovitev in priporočilo
V. Conclusion and Recommendation
Glede na opisano je jasno, da je edina ustrezna pravna podlaga za ta predlog člen 43(2) PDEU.
In light of the foregoing it is clear that Article 43(2) TFEU is the sole appropriate legal basis for this proposal.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je na svoji seji 28. aprila 2010 soglasno sklenil
At its meeting of 28 April 2010 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
Pri končnem glasovanju so bili navzoči: Klaus-Heiner Lehne (predsednik), Luigi Berlinguer (podpredsednik), Evelyn Regner (podpredsednica), Sebastian Valentin Bodu (podpredsednik), Kurt Lechner (poročevalec), Piotr Borys, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Christian Engström, Eva Lichtenberger, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Francesco Enrico Speroni, József Szájer, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka. , da priporoči, da kot edino pravno podlago sprejmete člen 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The following were present for the final vote: Klaus-Heiner Lehne (Chair), Luigi Berlinguer (Vice-Chair), Evelyn Regner (Vice-Chair), Sebastian Valentin Bodu (Vice-Chair), Kurt Lechner (rapporteur), Piotr Borys, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Christian Engström, Eva Lichtenberger, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Francesco Enrico Speroni, József Szájer, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka , to recommend that you adopt Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union as the sole appropriate legal basis.
o upravljanju interneta: naslednji koraki
on internet governance: the next steps
Poročevalec: Francisco Sosa Wagner
Rapporteur: Francisco Sosa Wagner
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................20
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ................................21
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................24
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................25
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 27
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 28
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Upravljanje interneta: naslednji koraki ( COM(2009)0277 )“;,
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled ‘internet governance: the next steps’ ( COM(2009)0277 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Kako zaščititi Evropo pred obsežnimi kibernetskimi napadi in prekinitvami: izboljšati pripravljenost, varnost in odpornost“ ( KOM(2009)0149 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled ‘Protecting Europe from large scale cyber-attacks and disruptions: enhancing preparedness, security and resilience’ ( COM(2009)0149 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. oktobra 1998 o globalizaciji in informacijski družbi: potreba po okrepljenem mednarodnem usklajevanju
– having regard to its resolution of 14 October 1998 on globalisation and the information society: the need for strengthened international coordination
UL C 104, 14.4.1999, str.
OJ C 104, 14.04.1999, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. februarja 2001 o organizaciji in upravljanju interneta – vprašanja mednarodne in evropske politike 1998–2000
– having regard to its resolution of 19 February 2001 on the organisation and management of the internet - international and European policy issues 1998-2000
UL C 343, 5.12.2001, str.
OJ C 343, 05.12.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 2. aprila 2001 o internetu naslednje generacije: potreba po evropski raziskovalni pobudi
– having regard to its resolution of 2 April 2001 on the next generation internet: the need for an EU research initiative
UL C 227E, 31.1.2002, str.
OJ C 027E, 31.01.2002, p.
UL C 313E, 8.6.2006, str.
C 133E, 08.06.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. decembra 2005 o človekovih pravicah in svobodi tiska v Tuniziji in oceni svetovnega vrha o informacijski družbi v Tuniziji
– having regard to its resolution of 15 December 2005 on human rights and freedom of the press in Tunisia and evaluation of the World Summit on the Information Society in Tunisia
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2006 o svobodi izražanja na internetu
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2006 on freedom of expression on the internet
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. januarja 2008 o drugem forumu o upravljanju interneta, ki je potekal od 12. do 15. novembra 2007 v Riu de Janeiru
– having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2008 on the second Internet Governance Forum, held in Rio de Janeiro from 12 to 15 November 2007
UL C 41E, 19.2.2009, str.
OJ C 41E, 19.2.2009, p.80. ,
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0194 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0194 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje, Odbora za pravne zadeve in Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7–0185/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Culture and Education, the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0185/2010 ),
A. ker je internet temeljno globalno sredstvo za komuniciranje in ker ima velikanski vpliv na celotno družbo,
A. whereas the internet is a critical global means of communication with a tremendous impact on society as whole,
B. ker upravljanje interneta vključuje vprašanja v zvezi z varovanjem in zagotavljanjem temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, dostopom do interneta, njegovo uporabo in ranljivostjo zaradi spletnih napadov itd.,
B. whereas internet governance involves issues relating to protection and guarantee of fundamental rights and freedoms, access to and use of the internet and its vulnerability to cyber attack, etc.,
C. ker kibernetski kriminal vse bolj ogroža naše družbe, ki se opirajo na informacijsko in komunikacijsko tehnologijo, in ker je vse več napeljevanja na teroristične napade, kazniva dejanja spodbujanja sovraštva in otroške pornografije, kar ogroža posameznike, tudi otroke,
C. whereas cybercrime is posing an increasing threat to societies that rely on ICT, and whereas incitement to commit terrorist attacks, hate-based crimes , and child pornography have increased and are endangering individuals including children,
D. ker je preplet med kibernetskim kriminalom, jurisdikcijo nad internetom in računalništvom v oblaku kot porajajoč se vidik upravljanja interneta na evropski ravni zelo pomemben,
D. whereas the intersection between cybercrime, internet jurisdiction and cloud computing as an emerging internet governance aspect at the European level is of great importance,
E. ker se posamezni vidiki upravljanja interneta nanašajo na internetno naslavljanje in druga pretežno tehnična vprašanja, s katerimi se ukvarjajo Internetna korporacija za dodeljevanje imen in številk (ICANN), Organ za dodeljevanje internetnih naslovov (IANA), Projektna skupina za internetno tehnologijo (IETF), regionalni internetni registri in druge organizacije,
E. whereas aspects of internet governance concern internet addressing and other predominantly technical issues, in which areas entities such as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) , the Regional Internet Registries and other entities are active,