natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Po drugi strani lahko izcedne vode, ki so posledica odlaganja, kontaminirajo podtalnico in tla ter povzročajo bio-aerosole, smrad in vidne motnje, če se ne zajamejo v skladu z Direktivo o odlagališčih.
Moreover, the leachate produced by landfilling, if not collected in accordance with the Landfill Directive, can contaminate groundwater and soil as well as generating bio-aerosols, unpleasant smells and visual disturbances.
Nadaljnji negativni vidik odlaganja je površina uporabljenih zemljišč, ki je večja kot pri drugih načinih ravnanja z odpadki in dolgoročno vodi v nepopravljivo izgubo zemljišč, kar pomeni, da ne gre za trajnosten način.
A further negative aspect of landfilling is the area of land used, which is larger than for other waste management options and leads in the long term to the irrecoverable loss of land, which means that this is not a sustainable option.
Biološke odpadke je treba torej nujno preusmeriti z odlagališč.
It is therefore urgent to divert bio-waste from landfills.
Potencial bioloških odpadkov za boj proti degradaciji tal
The potential of bio-waste in combating soil degradation
V tematski strategiji za varstvo tal iz leta 2006 ( KOM(2006)0231 konč.) je degradacija tal opisana kot resen problem v Evropski uniji.
The 2006 Thematic Strategy on Soil Protection (COM(2006)231 final) describes soil degradation as a serious problem in the European Union.
Ta degradacija neposredno vpliva na kakovost vode in zraka, biološko raznovrstnost in podnebje.
Soil degradation has a direct impact on water and air quality, biodiversity and the climate.
Biološki odpadki lahko odločilno vplivajo na obnovitev tal, če se jih uporabi za kompostiranje.
Bio-waste can play a crucial role in the recovery of soil if it is used for composting.
Kompostiranje je najprimernejši način obdelave za zelene odpadke, njegova prednost pa je, da ga je mogoče uporabiti za gnojenje tal.
Composting is the most appropriate treatment option for green waste and offers the advantage that it can be used to fertilise the soil.
Na podlagi tematske strategije za varstvo tal, bi lahko stroški degradacije tal znašali okrog 38 milijard evrov na leto.
According to the Thematic Strategy on Soil Protection, soil degradation could cost up to €38 billion a year.
Poudarek pri pridelavi komposta bi moral biti rezultat, saj je potreben visokokakovosten kompost.
Compost production should place the emphasis on the result, the goal being high-quality compost.
V tematski strategiji za varstvo tal je kompost predstavljen kot eden najboljših virov stabilnih organskih snovi, iz katerih v degradiranih tleh nastaja novi humus.
According to the Thematic Strategy on Soil Protection, compost is one of the best sources of stable organic matter from which new humus can be formed in damaged soil.
Uporaba komposta prinaša agronomske koristi, kot so izboljšanje strukture tal, infiltriranje vlage, zmožnost zadrževanja vode, mikroorganizmi v tleh in oskrba s hranili.
Using compost offers agronomic benefits, such as improved soil structure, moisture infiltration, water retention capacity, soil microorganisms and supply with nutrients.
Ocenjuje se, da ima 45 % evropskih tal majhno vsebnost organskih snovi.
It is estimated that 45% of European soils have low organic matter content.
V zvezi s tem je pomembno spodbujati pridelavo visokokakovostnega komposta na podlagi ustrezne obdelave bioloških odpadkov.
In this context it is important to encourage the production of high-quality compost based on the appropriate treatment of bio-waste.
Možnosti za uporabo bioloških odpadkov za spodbujanje energije iz obnovljivih virov
The potential of bio-waste in promoting renewable energies
Biološki odpadki so lahko tudi pomembna surovina za pridobivanje bioenergije.
Bio-waste can also represent an important raw material for the production of bio-energy.
Bioenergija nastane z anaerobno presnovo, ki je najprimernejši način obdelave za vlažne biološke odpadke (npr. maščobo pri kuhinjskih odpadkih).
Bio-energy is created from anaerobic digestion, which is the most appropriate treatment option for wet bio-waste (such as waste kitchen fat).
Anaerobno presnova proizvaja bioplin v nadzorovanih reaktorjih, ki ga je mogoče uporabiti za pridobivanje električne energije, ogrevanje ali kot biogorivo za avtomobile.
Anaerobic digestion produces bio-gas in controlled reactors that can be used to generate electricity, for heating or as bio-fuel for cars.
Biološke odpadke slabše kakovosti, ki ne izpolnjujejo meril kakovosti za kompostiranje, bi bilo treba pretvoriti v energijo in razvrstiti po kakovosti.
Lower-quality bio-waste which does not meet the quality criteria for composting should be processed into energy and graded according to quality.
Sedanje ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki
The current management of bio-waste
Danes se za ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki po posameznih državah članicah uporabljajo zelo različne politike, od minimalnih ukrepov v nekaterih do ambicioznih politik v drugih.
Up to now, bio-waste has been managed in line with widely differing policies in each Member State, ranging from minimum actions in some countries to ambitious policies in others.
Razpon sega od držav članic, v katerih je recikliranja malo (90 % odlaganja, 10 % recikliranja in energetske predelave), do najučinkovitejših (10 % odlaganja, 25 % energetske predelave in 65 % recikliranja).
There is a wide discrepancy between those Member States that recycle least (90% landfilling, 10% recycling and energy recovery) and those with the most efficient approaches (10% landfilling, 25% energy recovery and 65% recycling).
Veljavna zakonodaja Evropske unije ne omejuje držav članic pri izbiri možnosti obdelave bioloških odpadkov, če upoštevajo nekatere okvirne pogoje, ki so določeni v Okvirni direktivi o odpadkih, ki države članice poziva k sprejetju ukrepov za spodbujanje: ločenega zbiranja bioloških odpadkov za kompostiranje in razgradnjo bioloških odpadkov; obdelave bioloških odpadkov na način, ki zagotavlja visoko raven varovanja okolja; ter uporabe okoljsko varnih materialov, proizvedenih iz bioloških odpadkov.
Current EU legislation does not restrict the Member States' choices in terms of the treatment options for bio-waste provided that they meet certain framework conditions, in particular those laid down by the Waste Framework Directive, where Member States are urged to take measures that encourage: the separate collection of bio-waste with a view to composting and anaerobic digestion; the treatment of bio-waste in a way that fulfils a high level of environmental protection; and the use of environmentally safe materials produced from bio-waste.
Direktiva o odlagališčih že določa postopno obvezno preusmeritev bioloških odpadkov z odlagališč.
The Landfill Directive also stipulates that bio-waste should gradually be diverted from landfills.
Vendar zastavljeni cilji s temi zakonodajnimi instrumenti še niso uresničeni.
However, these legislative instruments have not achieved their intended objectives.
Glede na to, da države članice slabo uresničujejo cilj preusmeritve bioloških odpadkov z odlagališč, se kaže jasna potreba po sprejetju dodatnih ukrepov, ki bodo dopolnjevali direktivo o odlagališčih.
Given the poor implementation of the goal of diversion of bio-waste from landfills by Member States, it is clear that additional measures need to be introduced to complement the Landfill Directive.
Prihodnost ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki
The future of bio-waste management
Posebna direktiva za ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki bi bila odločilen steber za izvajanje načel iz okvirne direktive o odpadkih in drugih direktiv o ravnanju z odpadki na splošno.
A specific directive for bio-waste management would be a key pillar for the implementation of the principles arising from the Waste Framework Directive and other directives relating to waste management in general.
Poleg tega bi bila združitev vseh mogočih pravil o ravnanju z biološkimi odpadki v enem zakonodajnem aktu vaja v zakonodajni odličnosti in boljši pripravi zakonodaje.
Moreover, compiling all the various rules on the management of bio-waste in a single piece of legislation would in itself be an exercise in legislative excellence and better lawmaking.
Posebna direktiva za ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki bi na to področje prinesla večjo jasnost, poenostavitev in pravno gotovost in tako zagotovila dolgoročno zaupanje javnosti in zasebnih vlagateljev.
A specific directive for bio-waste management would offer greater clarity, simplification and legal certainty in this area, thus guaranteeing the long-term confidence of public and private investors.
Uvedba najugodnejše možnosti ravnanja ni zaželena, saj je treba upoštevati številne spremenljivke in lokalne vidike.
It is not desirable to impose the most beneficial management option, since there are a large number of variables and local considerations that need to be taken into account.
Poleg tega ne bi smeli ogroziti že obstoječih naložb držav članic.
Furthermore, the investments already made by the Member States should not be jeopardized.
Direktiva o ravnanju z biološkimi odpadki bi zato morala omogočati določeno prožnost, tako da bi lahko najboljšo rešitev z okoljskega in ekonomskega vidika določili lokalno.
A directive on the management of bio-waste should therefore allow a degree of flexibility so that the best solution from an environmental and economic point of view can be identified locally.
Vseeno je določitev standardov za konvergenco na okoljski ravni na tem področju odločilna za nove neposredne naložbe.
Nevertheless, the establishment of standards for environmental convergence in this area are crucial to direct new investments.
Ena od smeri bi morala biti ločeno zbiranje bioloških odpadkov v takem obsegu, da ločevanje bioloških odpadkov od drugih tokov odpadkov lahko prepreči kontaminacijo in pospešuje pridobivanje visokokakovostnega komposta, zagotavlja kakovostne materiale za recikliranje bioloških odpadkov ter izboljša učinkovitost energetske predelave.
One of the directions should be taken towards the separate collection of bio-waste to the extent that the separation of bio-waste from other waste streams can prevent contamination and promote the objective of obtaining a high quality compost, provide materials quality for the recycling of bio-waste and improve efficiency of energy recovery.
Ločeno zbiranje bi zato moralo biti obvezno.
Separate collection should therefore be mandatory.
Vendar bi bile države članice lahko oproščene te obveznosti, če ločeno zbiranje ne bi bilo izvedljivo ali ne bi bilo najboljša možnost z okoljskega in ekonomskega vidika (npr. kadar z logistiko za ločeno zbiranje ni mogoče preprečiti kontaminacije bioloških odpadkov ali kadar uvedba infrastrukture za ločeno zbiranje odpadkov ni okoljsko upravičena na podeželju ali redko poseljenih območjih).
The Member States could nevertheless be exempted from this obligation where it is not viable or not the best option from the environmental and economic point of view (for example where the logistics of separate collection do not make it possible to prevent bio-waste from being contaminated, or where the imposition of a separate collection infrastructure is not environmentally justified in rural or sparsely populated areas).
Ureditev bioloških odpadkov ni pomembna le z okoljskega vidika, ampak tudi z vidika delovanja notranjega trga, saj se zdaj dogaja, da je kompost, pridobljen iz bioloških odpadkov, nekje obravnavan kot odpadek, drugje pa kot proizvod.
The importance of bio-waste regulation is not only of environmental relevance but also relevant for the internal market functioning, since we now have situations where compost produced from bio-waste may be regarded as waste in one place and as a product in another.
Tudi na tem področju je treba uskladiti politike držav članic s posebno direktivo o bioloških odpadkih.
Here too the Member States' policies need to be harmonised through a specific directive on bio-waste.
Ravnanje z odpadki ima tudi pomembne družbene posledice.
Waste management also has significant social implications.
Reciklažna industrija na primer pomeni do 250 delovnih mest, če je recikliranih 10 000 ton odpadkov, v primerjavi z 20 do 40 delovnimi mesti, če se odpadki sežgejo, in s približno 10 delovnimi mesti, če se odpadki odložijo na odlagališča.
For example, the recycling industry creates up to 250 jobs where 10 000 tonnes of waste are recycled, by comparison with between 20 and 40 jobs created when waste is incinerated and around 10 jobs when it is dumped in landfills.
Z zbranimi številnimi razdrobljenimi pravili o bioloških odpadkih skupaj z novimi pravili v eni posebni direktivi o ravnanju z biološkimi odpadki bi lahko učinkoviteje upravljali vire in zmanjšali stroške ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki.
Compiling the various fragmented rules on bio-waste, in combination with new rules, in a single specific directive on the management of bio-waste would make it possible to manage resources more efficiently and cut the costs of bio-waste management.
Prav tako bi bilo mogoče obnoviti organske snovi v tleh in zmanjšati uporabo kemičnih gnojil, pomagati državam članicam pri uresničevanju cilja preusmeritve bioloških odpadkov z odlagališč, spodbujati ločeno zbiranje, pojasniti, kdaj se material, proizveden iz biološkega odpadka, šteje za proizvod, ter spodbujati tehnološke inovacije in ustvarjanje delovnih mest v skladu s strategijo EU 2020.
It would also make it possible to restore organic matter in soils and reduce the use of chemical fertilisers, help the Member States achieve the objectives of diverting bio-waste from landfills, encourage separate collection, clarify the point at which material produced from bio-waste is considered a product, and promote technological innovation and job creation in line with the EU 2020 Strategy.
Evropske institucije se v trenutni gospodarski krizi ne smejo odreči svojim ambicijam po vodilnem položaju na področju okolja ali jih zmanjšati.
In the present economic crisis, the European institutions must not resign or curtail their ambitions of leadership on environmental issues.
V EU ne moremo nadaljevati s sedanjim stanjem, v katerem se velik delež odpadkov odloži na odlagališča.
We cannot continue with the current situation in the EU where such a large percentage of waste is dumped in landfills.
Zdi se, da je ta možnost najcenejša, dejansko pa je najdražja, saj povzroča dolgoročne stroške, ničesar ne prispeva k uresničevanju naših ciljev na področju boja proti podnebnim spremembam in ne omogoča uporabe bioloških odpadkov kot vira.
Although this option seems to be the cheapest, it is actually the most expensive given its long-term costs, it does nothing to help achieve our objectives in terms of combating climate change and does not make it possible to use bio-waste as a resource.
S podporo sočasnemu ločenemu zbiranju vzbujamo v državljanih novo okoljsko ozaveščenost, hkrati pa se zmanjšujemo stroške in spodbujamo obravnavo bioloških odpadkov kot proizvodov.
By advocating a simultaneous separate collection, we engage citizens in a new environmental awareness, while reducing costs and encouraging the valorisation of bio-waste as a product.
S tako naravnano posebno direktivo o bioloških odpadkih je mogoče povezati visoko raven varstva okolja in trajnostne rasti z zagotavljanjem kakovostnega življenja evropskim državljanom.
With a specific Directive for bio-waste that points in this direction, we are able to combine a high environmental protection and sustainable growth with the assurance of quality of life for European citizens.
3. poudarja vlogo, ki jo lahko ima ponovna uporaba bioloških odpadkov v obliki komposta v boju proti podnebnim spremembam, degradaciji tal in eroziji prsti; poziva države članice, naj kompostiranje vključijo v svojo nacionalno zakonodajo ter si izmenjajo zglede najboljše prakse; poudarja, da sta potrebna boljše upravljanje z odpadki in uskladitev standardov kakovosti za kompost, da se spodbudi razvoj evropskega trga za kompost;
Stresses the role which reused bio-waste in the form of compost can play in combating climate change soil degradation and erosion; calls on Member States to provide for composting in their national legislation and urges that they exchange best practices; stresses that improvements in bio-waste management and the harmonisation of quality standards for compost are needed to encourage the development of a European market for compost;
7. priznava, da morajo države članice oblikovati skladen in stabilen pravni okvir, ki bo podpiral izgradnjo objektov za kompostiranje in pridobivanje energije iz (bioloških) odpadkov;
Recognises the need for Member States to set up a consistent and stable legal framework which supports the construction of facilities for composting and energy recovery from (bio)waste;
13. poudarja prednost, ki jo ima proizvodnja goriv za prevoz iz bioloških odpadkov za okolje; zato poziva, naj biogoriva iz bioloških odpadkov štejejo k ciljem recikliranja; poziva k uskladitvi opredelitve bioloških odpadkov iz Okvirne direktive o odpadkih z direktivo o obnovljivih virih energije;
Underlines the environmental advantage of producing transport fuels from bio-waste; calls, therefore, for biofuels from bio-waste to count towards recycling targets; calls for the definition of bio-waste in the Waste Framework Directive to be aligned with that of the Renewable Energy Directive;
15. poziva Komisijo, naj v svoji presoji vplivov opredeli boljši sistem ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki glede recikliranja ločeno zbranih bioloških odpadkov, uporabe kompostiranja za kmetijske in ekološke koristi, mehanske/biološke možnosti obdelave in uporabe bioloških odpadkov kot vir za pridobivanje energije; meni, da bi na tej presoji morala temeljiti priprava novega pravnega okvira Evropske unije o biološko razgradljivih odpadkih;
Calls on the Commission to elaborate in its impact assessment an improved system for the management of bio-waste regarding the recycling of separately collected bio-waste, the use of composting for agricultural and ecological benefit, the mechanical/biological treatment options, and the use of bio-waste as a source for generating energy; considers that this impact assessment should be used as a basis for preparing a new European Union legal framework on biodegradable waste;
18. ugotavlja, da bi prihodnji okvir Evropske unije za veliko držav članic zagotovil pravno svetovanje in pojasnitev ter jih spodbujal k naložbam na področju ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki;
Notes that a future European Union framework would provide legal guidance and clarity for many Member States and would encourage them to make investments in the field of bio-waste management;
3. meni, da bi moralo biti ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki del trajnostnega ravnanja z odpadki, katerega namen je racionalna uporaba in ohranjanje virov ter zmanjševanje vpliva na okolje,
Believes that bio-waste management should be part of a sustainable waste management cycle aimed at the rational use and conservation of resources and reducing the environmental impact;
5. meni, da se lahko optimalna odločitev za postopek obdelave sprejme samo ob stalnem preverjanju lokalnih razmer (naselitvena struktura, struktura bioloških odpadkov, že obstoječe zmogljivosti itd.),
Considers that the optimal decision in favour of a treatment procedure should be taken only in the light of an examination of the local situation (settlement structure, structure of the bio-waste, existing installations, etc.);
11. poudarja, da je treba jasno opredeliti standarde za obdelavo bioloških odpadkov in kakovost komposta, da bi se izognili postopnemu onesnaževanju tal; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni možnost zakonodajnih predlogov o merilih kakovosti za kompost in pregnito blato, ki morajo temeljiti na ločenem zbiranju,
Stresses the need for clearly defined quality standards on bio-waste treatment and compost quality in order to avoid the gradual pollution of soils; asks the Commission to assess the option of legislative proposals on qualitative criteria for compost and digestate, which should be based on the prerequisite of separate collection;
13. meni, bi moralo biti podlaga za povračilo povečanih stroškov zaradi vnosa škodljivih snovi načelo „onesnaževalec plača“, tako da negativni zunanji dejavniki uporabe bioloških odpadkov ne bi bremenili kmetijstva,
Considers that the 'polluter pays' principle should be taken as the basis for compensation for additional costs arising from inputs of pollutants, so that the negative externalities of spreading bio-waste are not paid for by farmers;
16. meni, da so biološki odpadki pomemben obnovljiv vir za proizvodnjo elektrike ter biogoriva za prevoz in uporabo v omrežju plina, saj se biometan pridobiva s prečiščevanjem bioplina (večinoma metan – 50 in 70 % – ter ogljikov dioksid); poziva Komisijo, naj analizira in spodbuja možnosti uporabe organskih odpadkov za pridobivanje bioplina,
Considers bio-waste to be a valuable renewable resource for the production of electricity and biofuel for means of transport and for feeding into the gas network through conversion of biogas into biomethane (mainly methane – 50% to 75% – and carbon dioxide), and calls on the Commission to analyse and promote ways of using bio-waste to produce biogas;
18. ugotavlja, da se veljavni nacionalni zakonodajni ukrepi in sistemi ravnanja z odpadki med državami članicami razlikujejo in da je odlaganje trdnih komunalnih odpadkov v Evropski uniji še vedno najpogosteje uporabljen postopek; poziva Komisijo, naj odločneje zagotavlja spoštovanje in uporabo določb o odlaganju odpadkov v vsej Skupnosti ter naj čim prej oceni potrebo po zakonodajnem predlogu za ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki, da bi zagotovili, da biološki odpadki ne bodo prišli do odlagališč; poziva države članice, naj povečajo svoje sodelovanje in njihovo izmenjavo najboljše prakse na področju ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki,
Notes that the individual Member States have different existing national legislative measures and different waste management systems and that the use of landfill continues to be the most common disposal method for municipal solid waste in the European Union; calls on the Commission to make greater efforts to enforce and secure the application of the laws on landfilling throughout the Community and to assess the need for a legislative proposal on biodegradable waste as soon as possible, also in order to ensure that bio-waste is prevented from reaching landfill; calls on the Member States to increase their cooperation and their exchange of best practices in the field of bio-waste management;
John Stuart Agnew, Richard Ashworth, Liam Aylward, Christophe Béchu, José Bové, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă, Michel Dantin, Paolo De Castro, Albert Deß, Herbert Dorfmann, Lorenzo Fontana, Iratxe García Pérez, Martin Häusling, Esther Herranz García, Peter Jahr, Elisabeth Jeggle, Elisabeth Köstinger, Giovanni La Via, Stéphane Le Foll, George Lyon, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gabriel Mato Adrover, Mairead McGuinness, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), James Nicholson, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Georgios Papastamkos, Marit Paulsen, Britta Reimers, Alfreds Rubiks, Giancarlo Scotta’, Alyn Smith, Marc Tarabella, Janusz Wojciechowski
John Stuart Agnew, Richard Ashworth, Liam Aylward, Christophe Béchu, José Bové, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă, Michel Dantin, Paolo De Castro, Albert Deß, Herbert Dorfmann, Lorenzo Fontana, Iratxe García Pérez, Martin Häusling, Esther Herranz García, Peter Jahr, Elisabeth Jeggle, Elisabeth Köstinger, Giovanni La Via, Stéphane Le Foll, George Lyon, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gabriel Mato Adrover, Mairead McGuinness, Mariya Nedelcheva, James Nicholson, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Georgios Papastamkos, Marit Paulsen, Britta Reimers, Alfreds Rubiks, Giancarlo Scotta’, Alyn Smith, Marc Tarabella, Janusz Wojciechowski
Salvatore Caronna, Spiros Danels (Spyros Danellis), Esther de Lange, Filip Kaczmarek, Hans-Peter Mayer, Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
Salvatore Caronna, Spyros Danellis, Esther de Lange, Filip Kaczmarek, Hans-Peter Mayer, Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
o prihodnosti skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013
on the future of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2013
Poročevalec: George Lyon
Rapporteur: George Lyon