natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Urad poleg določb tega sklepa, ki so značilne za njegovo medinstitucionalno vlogo, uporablja upravne in finančne postopke Komisije.
Apart from the provisions of this Decision which are specific to the interinstitutional role of the Office, the Office shall apply the administrative and financial procedures of the Commission .
Komisija pri opredelitvi navedenih postopkov upošteva posebno naravo Urada“.
In establishing those procedures the Commission shall take account of the specific nature of the Office. ’
„Člen 8(3) - Oseba za stike z organom, ki da razrešnico glede strateških odločitev na področjih, ki so v pristojnosti Urada, je predsednik upravnega odbora v vlogi zastopnika za medinstitucionalno sodelovanje“.
‘ Article 8(3) – The contact person with discharge authority for strategic decisions within the areas of competence of the Office shall be the Chairperson of the Management Committee in his capacity as representative of interinstitutional cooperation. ’
„Člen 9 - Direktor Urada pod nadzorom in v okviru pristojnosti upravnega odbora odgovarja za ustrezno delovanje Urada .
‘ Article 9 – The Director of the Office shall be responsible for the smooth running of the Office, acting under the authority of the Management Committee and within its scope of competence.
Pri uporabi upravnih in finančnih postopkov deluje pod nadzorom Komisije.“
For the application of administrative and financial procedures he shall act under the authority of the Commission . ’
Podčrtal avtor.
Underlining by the author.
Člen 1(2) dodeli odgovornost za strateške odločitve upravnemu odboru.
Article 1(2) attributes the responsibility for strategic decisions to the Management Committee.
Odločitev, ki bo razveljavljena, ne vsebuje enakovredne določbe.
The decision, which is to be repealed, does not contain an equivalent provision.
Stari upravni odbor „zastopa vse institucije, ki so podpisnice tega sklepa“.
The old Management Committee is ‘ representing all the signatory institutions ’
Člen 7(1).
Article 7(1). .
Sprejetje strateških ciljev Urada za publikacije in določanje smernic njegove splošne politike zahtevata soglasno odločitev
The adoption of the strategic objectives of the Office and the setting of guidelines for its general policies require a unanimous decision
Člen 8(1)(a) in (b). .
Article 8(1) (a) and (b). .
Iz teh določb je razvidno, da institucije, ki ustanovijo Urad za publikacije, prevzamejo skupno odgovornost za strateške ali politične odločitve.
It can be seen from these provisions that the Institutions establishing the Office assume responsibility collectively for ‘strategic’ or ‘political’ decisions.
Ker morajo za tovrstno odločitev glasovati vse institucije, so vse tudi posamično odgovorne.
As every institution has to vote in favour of this kind of decision, every institution may be held responsible also individually.
Jasno porazdelitev odgovornosti je zaradi medinstitucionalnega značaja Urada za publikacije in dejstva, da ta ni pravna oseba, težko doseči
A clearer allocation of responsibilities is difficult to achieve owing to the interinstitutional character of the Office and the fact that it does not have legal personality
Člen 14(2) potrjuje odsotnost pravne sposobnosti. „Vse pritožbe na področjih, ki so v pristojnosti Urada, se vložijo zoper Komisijo“. .
The absence of a legal capacity is confirmed by Article 14(2): ‘Any legal action within the area of competence of the Office shall be brought against the Commission.’ .
Člen 8(3) poudarja medinstitucionalni značaj takšnih odločitev, saj določa, da predsednik upravnega odbora pri strateških odločitvah deluje „v vlogi zastopnika za medinstitucionalno sodelovanje“.
Article 8(3) underlines the interinstitutional character of such decisions by stipulating that the Chairperson of the Management Committee, as far as strategic decisions are concerned, acts ‘ in his capacity as representative of interinstitutional cooperation ’.
Lahko se torej šteje, da je bila prva zahteva Parlamenta, namreč jasna dodelitev politične odgovornosti, upoštevana.
The first request formulated by Parliament, namely that there should be a ‘ clear allocation of political responsibilities ’, can therefore be considered to have been taken into account.
Člen1(2) tudi določa, da Urad za publikacije „uporablja upravne in finančne postopke Komisije“ in da mora Komisija pri opredelitvi navedenih postopkov upoštevati posebno naravo Urada za publikacije.
Article 1(2) further states that the Office ‘ shall apply the administrative and financial procedures of the Commission ’ and that the Commission has to lay down those procedures taking account of the specific nature of the Office.
Člen 9 celo določa, da direktor Urada za publikacije običajno deluje pod nadzorom upravnega odbora, razen pri uporabi upravnih in finančnih postopkov, ko „deluje pod nadzorom Komisije“.
What is more, Article 9 provides that the Director of the Office acts normally under the authority of the Managing Committee, except for the application of administrative and financial procedures where he shall be placed ‘ under the authority of the Commission ’.
To navedbo nekoliko omili člen 10(10), v katerem je navedeno, da v zvezi z dodeljevanjem sredstev Komisije in izvrševanjem proračuna komisar, pristojen za odnose z Uradom za publikacije, in direktor Urada za publikacije sporazumno določita postopke medsebojnega obveščanja in posvetovanja.
This statement is to a certain degree attenuated by Article 10(10), which says that for the purposes of the assignment of Commission funds and implementation of the budget, the Member of the Commission responsible for relations with the Office and the Director of the Office shall establish mutual information and consultation procedures by common consent.
Pri kadrovskih zadevah pa ima seveda Komisija kot organ za imenovanje uradnikov in kot organ, pooblaščen za sklepanje pogodb, vodilno vlogo.
In staff matters, on the other hand, the Commission clearly has a dominant role: it is the appointing authority for officials and the authority empowered to conclude contracts for other servants.
Nekatere od teh pristojnosti se lahko prenesejo znotraj Komisije ali na direktorja Urada za publikacije
Some of those powers may be delegated within the Commission or to the Director of the Office
Člen 11(3). .
Article 11(3). .
Osebje dodelijo Uradu za publikacije institucije.
The personnel of the office is assigned to it by the institutions.
Predpisi in postopki, ki jih Komisija sprejme za izvajanje kadrovskih predpisov, se uporabljajo za uradnike in druge uslužbence, dodeljene Uradu za publikacije, pod istimi pogoji kot za uradnike in druge uslužbence Komisije, zaposlene v Luxembourgu
The provisions and procedures adopted by the Commission to implement the Staff Regulations apply to officials and other servants assigned to the Office under the same conditions as for Commission officials and other servants serving in Luxembourg
Člen 11(4). .
Article 11(4). .
Člen 11(1). .
Article 11(1). .
Na podlagi teh določb lahko zaključimo, da Urad za publikacije z vidika splošnega upravljanja in kadrovanja deluje skoraj na enak način kot generalni direktorat sekretariata Komisije.
These provisions allow it to be concluded that the Office is run, with respect to general administration and personnel management, almost in the same way as a Directorate General of the Secretariat of the Commission.
Komisija ima vodilni položaj, zato je odgovorna za te zadeve.
The Commission occupies a dominant position and therefore assumes responsibility for these matters.
Iz analize zadevnih določb je razvidno, da novi sklep uvaja jasno porazdelitev odgovornosti v upravnih zadevah.
It appears from this analysis of the provisions in question that the new Decision establishes a clear allocation of responsibility in administrative matters.
Obravnavani osnutek sklepa o organizaciji in delovanju Urada za publikacije jasno porazdeli odgovornosti glede upravnih in političnih zadev.
The draft Decision on the organisation and operation of the Publications Office under consideration allocates in a clear way the responsibilities with regard to administrative and political matters.
O njegovem predhodniku iz leta 2000 tega ne bi mogli trditi.
This was not the case with its predecessor of 2000.
Osnutek besedila upošteva zahteve Parlamenta v postopku razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2001, zato se lahko v imenu Evropskega parlamenta odobri.
The draft text takes account of the requests made by Parliament in the discharge procedure for the financial year 2001 and can therefore be approved on behalf of the European Parliament.
PISMO ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN
LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS
Pismo Reimerja Bögeja, predsednika Odbora za proračun, Joju Leinenu, predsedniku Odbora za ustavne zadeve, z dne 5. novembra 2008
Letter of 5 November 2008 from Mr Reimer Böge, chairman of the Committee on Budgets, to Mr Jo Leinen, chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
Zadeva: Osnutek sklepa Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta, Komisije, Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, Računskega sodišča, Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij o organizaciji in delovanju Urada za publikacije Evropske unije
Subject : Draft Decision of the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the organisation and operation of the Publications Office of the European Union
Spoštovani predsednik,
Dear Chairman,
Naš odbor meni, da bo okvirni sklep izpopolnil opredelitve glede pristojnosti urada in zelo izboljšal identifikacijo političnih in upravnih odgovornosti institucij in upravnih organov urada, s čimer bo v veliki meri dosežen cilj, ki ga je Parlament zastavil v svoji resoluciji z dne 29. januarja 2004 o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2001
Our committee considers in fact that the draft Decision will ameliorate the definition of the competencies of the OPOCE and dramatically improve the identification of political and administrative responsibilities of the institutions and of the governing bodies of the Office, thus largely meeting the goal put forward by Parliament in its resolution of 29 January 2004 concerning discharge in respect of the 2001 financial year
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 29. januarja 2004 o ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela Komisija zaradi pripomb, ki jih je vsebovala resolucija, priložena sklepu o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2001(UL C 96 E, 21.4.2004, str.
European Parliament resolution of 29 January 2004 on the action taken by the Commission on the observations contained in the resolution accompanying the decision giving discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2001 financial year (OJ C 96 E, 21.4.2004, p.
Naš odbor pravzaprav meni, da bodo razjasnitev nalog, ki so zaupane uradu, razmejitev odgovornosti med uradom in Komisijo, jasna določitev politične odgovornosti upravnega odbora in upravne odgovornosti direktorja urada ter razjasnitev vloge Komisije kot organa, ki imenuje uradnike in je pooblaščen za sklepanje pogodb z ostalimi uslužbenci, prispevale k jasnejši „dodelitvi upravnih in političnih odgovornosti”, kot je to v zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji zahteval Parlament.
In fact, our committee considers that the clarification of the tasks entrusted to the Office, the delimitation of responsibilities between the Office and the Commission, the clear identification of the political responsibility of the Management Committee and of the administrative responsibility of the Director of the Office, as well as the clarification of the role of the Commission as appointing authority for officials and authority empowered to conclude contracts for other servants will contribute to a much more clear ‘allocation of administrative and political responsibilities’ as requested by the European Parliament in its resolution mentioned above.
Še zlasti bi želel poudariti dejstvo, da okvirni sklep jasno določa, da bo urad poleg svojih določb izvajal tudi upravne in finančne postopke Komisije ter da bo direktor urada pri izvajanju teh postopkov „deloval pod nadzorom Komisije” .
Allow me to stress in particular the fact that the draft Decision clarifies that ‘apart from its own specific provisions’, the Office shall ‘apply the administrative and financial procedures of the Commission’ and that the Director of the Office shall ‘act under the authority of the Commission’ when applying those procedures.
Dobro je tudi to, da okvirni sklep jasno določa, da se proračunsko in finančno upravljanje urada izvaja v skladu s finančno uredbo in podrobnimi pravili za njeno izvajanje ter finančnim okvirom, ki velja za Komisijo, vključno s sredstvi, ki jih razen Komisije prenesejo druge institucije.
It is equally positive that the draft Decision clarifies that the budgetary and financial management of the Office - including the management of appropriations assigned by other institutions than the Commission - shall be conducted in compliance with the Financial Regulation and its implementing provisions and the financial framework in force at the Commission.
Naš odbor meni, da bo okvirni sklep prispeval k izboljšanju upravnih postopkov urada in njegovega finančnega upravljanja ter bo proračunskemu organu omogočal, da svoje pristojnosti v zvezi z uradom izvaja bolj učinkovito.
Our committee believes that the draft Decision will contribute to improve the administrative and financial management of the Office and will allow the budgetary authority to exercise more effectively its prerogatives concerning the Office.
Odbor za proračun bo vsekakor v polni meri izkoristil nove možnosti, ki jih prinaša okvirni sklep.
The Committee on Budgets will certainly make full use of the new possibilities that the draft Decision offers.
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za ustavne zadeve, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its proposal for a decision:
A. ker v Evropski skupnosti vlada vladavina prava, ki temelji na načelu zakonitosti,
A. whereas the European Community is a community of law, based on the principle of legality,
B. ker je poznavanje zakonodaje prvi pogoj za njeno spoštovanje in pravilno uporabo,
B. whereas knowledge of the law is implicit in the observance and correct application thereof,
C. ker je širjenje ustreznih informacij najboljši način, da se Evropsko unijo približa državljanom,
C. whereas quality information and communication are the best means of bringing the European Union closer to citizens,
D. ker je treba za vzpostavitev evropskega pravosodnega prostora, ki bi bil vreden svojega imena, podrobno poznati pravo Evropske unije,
D. whereas the creation of a genuine European judicial area calls for in‑depth knowledge of European Union law,
E. ker je v Evropski uniji veliko razlik v poznavanju prava Skupnosti, ki je sicer omenjeno na pravniške kroge,
E. whereas significant differences remain within the European Union as regards knowledge of European Union law, which is limited, even in legal circles,
F. ker je bil Urad za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu „urad za publikacije”) pozvan, da postane glavni akter pri izvajanju informacijske in komunikacijske strategije,
F. whereas the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (‘Publications Office’) should become the prime actor in the implementation of the information and communication strategy,
G. ker bi morala biti večjezikovnost glavno orodje pri uresničevanju ciljev urada za publikacije, in sicer z objavami uradnega lista v vseh uradnih jezikih Unije hkrati; ker je treba to načelo razširiti na vse dejavnosti urada,
G. whereas multilingualism should be a key tool for achieving the objectives of the Publications Office, through simultaneous publication of the Official Journal in all the official languages of the Union; and whereas that principle needs to be extended to embrace all the activities of the Publications Office,
H. ker bi se moral urad za publikacije dejavno vključiti v prizadevanja za čim bolj učinkovito uporabo pravosodja, še zlasti s projektom oblikovanja portala EU, imenovanega "E-Justice", in s projektom krepitve evropske pravosodne mreže na področju civilnega in gospodarskega prava, in sicer na osnovi informacij, ki so na voljo v okviru Eur-Lexa, glavnega mesta dostopa do prava Evropske skupnosti,
H. whereas the Publications Office should be actively involved in the current efforts to promote effective access to justice, and especially in the plan to set up the European Union’s e‑Justice portal and to consolidate the European judicial network in the field of civil and commercial law, based on the resources available in EUR‑Lex, which is the main point of access to European Union law,
o posebnem poročilu Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 8/2007 o upravnem sodelovanju na področju davka na dodano vrednost
on the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 8/2007 concerning administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax
Mnenje poročevalke (*):
Rapporteur for opinion (*):
Bilyana Ilieva Raeva , Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve
Bilyana Ilieva Raeva , Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – člen 47 poslovnika
(*) Associated committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve (*) .............................13
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (*) ......13
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 8/2007 o upravnem sodelovanju na področju davka na dodano vrednost z odgovori Komisije
– having regard to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 8/2007 concerning administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax, together with the Commission's replies
UL C 20, 25.1.2008, str.
OJ C 20, 25.1.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2007/436/ES, Euratom z dne 7. junija 2007 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti
– having regard to Council Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom of 7 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities' own resources
UL L 163, 23.6.2007, str.
OJ L 163, 23.6.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6–0427/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and to the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0427/2008 ),
A. ker utaje in goljufije na področju davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) vplivajo na financiranje proračunov držav članic in tudi na sistem lastnih sredstev EU, če je treba zmanjšanje lastnih sredstev iz DDV nadomestiti s povečanjem lastnih sredstev iz bruto nacionalnega dohodka, pri čemer izkrivljanje zaradi goljufij na področju DDV vpliva na splošno ravnovesje sistema lastnih sredstev,
A. Whereas value added tax (VAT) evasion and fraud not only affect the financing of Member States' budgets, but also the EU own resources system insofar as reductions in the VAT own resource have to be compensated by an increase in the gross national income (GNI) own resource and thus distortions caused by VAT fraud affect the overall balance of the own resource system,
B. ker je Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 31. maja 2006 o potrebi po razvoju usklajene strategije za izboljšanje boja proti davčnim goljufijam ( KOM(2006)0254 ) ugotovila, da države članice niso dovolj izkoristile možnosti upravnega sodelovanja, ki so bile na voljo z okrepitvijo pravnega okvira v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1798/2003
B. Whereas the Commission, in its communication of 31 May 2006 concerning the need to develop a co-ordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud ( COM(2006)0254 ), observed that Member States were not making sufficient use of the possibilities for administrative cooperation offered by the reinforcement of the legal framework under Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003
1. pozdravlja posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 8/2007, ki vključuje neodvisno oceno upravnega sodelovanja v zvezi z bojem proti utajam in goljufijam na področju DDV ter podrobne analize uspešnosti držav članic in vloge Komisije; na osnovi ugotovitev Računskega sodišča sklepa, da Uredba (ES) št. 1798/2003 ni učinkovito orodje za upravno sodelovanje, ker več držav članic ovira njeno izvajanje in vloga Komisije je omejena;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors' Special Report No 8/2007, which provides an independent assessment of administrative cooperation in the fight against VAT evasion and fraud and analyses Member States’ performance and the Commission’s role in great detail; concludes, on the basis of the Court of Auditors' findings, that Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 is not an effective tool for administrative cooperation as several Member States obstruct its implementation and the Commission's role is limited;
2. se zaveda dejstva, da je težko oceniti dejanski znesek utaj DDV, ker veliko držav članic ne zbira ali ne objavlja teh podatkov; ugotavlja, da so na podlagi ocen sodišča izgube dohodka iz DDV v Nemčiji leta 2005 znašale 17 milijard EUR, v Združenem kraljestvu pa so v davčnem letu 2005–2006 znašale 18,2 milijarde EUR; ugotavlja, da bi lahko znesek goljufij na področju DDV presegel znesek skupnega letnega proračuna Skupnosti;
Is aware of the fact that the actual volume of VAT evasion and fraud is difficult to assess, as many Member States either do not collect or do not publish data; notes that according to estimates quoted by the Court, VAT revenue losses amounted to EUR 17 billion in Germany for 2005 and EUR 18,2 billion in the UK for the tax year 2005-2006; notes that the volume of VAT fraud could exceed the volume of the Community's total annual budget;
5. poziva Komisijo, Svet in države članice, da v celoti upoštevajo priporočila odbora za stike vrhovnih revizijskih institucij Evropske unije z decembra 2007, ki vključujejo predloge o tem, kako lahko države članice izboljšajo svoje ocene in kako vzpostavijo enotni model ocenjevanja goljufij na področju DDV;
Requests the Commission, the Council and the Member States to fully take into account the recommendations of the Contact Committee of the Supreme Audit Institutions of the European Union of December 2007, which include proposals as to how Member States could improve their estimates and how a single model for the estimation of VAT fraud could be established;
Pomanjkljivosti pri učinkovitosti organov držav članic
Shortcomings in the performance of Member States' authorities
- na skoraj polovico zahtevkov za informacije, ki jih ena država članica pošlje drugi, se ni odgovorilo v veljavnem trimesečnem roku,
- almost half of the requests for information from one Member State to another were not answered within the current three-month deadline,
- organizacija centralnih uradov za zvezo, tj. glavnih kanalov za izmenjavo informacij, je prispeval k zamudam; Italija in Nizozemska sta svoje centralne urade za zvezo razdelila na več oddelkov brez učinkovitega usklajevanja, Nemčija pa je svoje centralne urade za zvezo razdelila na več služb, o čemer ni ustrezno obvestila drugih držav članic,
- the organisational set up of the central liaison offices (CLO), i.e. the main channels for information exchange, contributed to delays; Italy and the Netherlands split their CLOs between several departments without coordinating them effectively and Germany split its CLO into several services without informing the other Member States properly,
- med številom zahtevkov za informacije, za katere neka država članica trdi, da jih je prejela, in številom zahtevkov, za katere druga država članica trdi, da jih je poslala, obstajajo pomembne razlike; Italija trdi, da je prejela 54 % manj zahtevkov, Nemčija pa 32 % več zahtevkov, kot naj bi jih poslale druge države članice po njihovih navedbah leta 2005;
- there are significant differences between the number of requests for information which a Member State claims to have received and the number of requests other Member States claim to have sent to it; Italy claimed to have received 54 % requests less and Germany 32 % requests more than other Member States claimed to have sent to them in 2005;