natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
„Člena 27 in 28 se uporabljata za postopke, s katerimi ena ali več družb preneha delovati brez likvidacije, vsa njihova sredstva in obveznosti pa se prenesejo na drugo družbo, če je 90 % ali več delnic in drugih vrednostnih papirjev, vendar ne vse, iz člena 27 družbe ali družb, ki se prevzemajo, v lasti zadevne družbe prevzemnice in/ali oseb, ki so imetniki teh delnic in vrednostnih papirjev v svojem imenu, vendar za račun zadevne družbe.“
Articles 27 and 28 shall apply to operations whereby one or more companies are wound up without going into liquidation and transfer all their assets and liabilities to another company, if 90 % or more, but not all, of the shares and other securities referred to in Article 27 of the company or companies being acquired are held by that acquiring company and/or by persons holding those shares and securities in their own names but on behalf of that company."
Direktiva 82/891/EGS
Directive 82/891/EEC
V členu 4 se doda naslednji odstavek :
In Article 4, the following paragraph is added:
„Takšna objava se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najpozneje en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev objavi načrt delitve na svoji ali kateri koli drugi spletni strani.
"Such publication shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning not later than one month before the day fixed for the general meeting, it makes available the draft terms of division on its own or on any other Internet site.
Če družba uporabi to možnost, na osrednji elektronski platformi iz člena 3(4) Direktive 68/151/EGS objavi sklic, ki omogoča dostop do zadevne spletne strani.
Where a company makes use of this possibility it shall publish a reference that gives access to that Internet site on the central electronic platform referred to in Article 3 (4) of Directive 68/151/EEC.
Ta sklic vključuje datum objave načrta delitve na spletni strani.“
That reference shall include the date of the publication of the draft terms of division on the Internet site."
V členu 4 se dodajo naslednji odstavki :
In Article 4, the following paragraphs shall be added:
„Takšna objava se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najmanj en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev , na kateri se odloča o načrtu delitve, objavi načrt delitve na svoji spletni strani , in sicer v celoti ali pa v obliki sklica ali povezave, ali na kateri koli drugi spletni strani, če nima svoje .
"Such publication shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning at least one month before the day of the general meeting which is to decide on the draft terms of division , it makes available the draft terms of division on its own Internet site in full or by way of reference or hyperlink or , if it has no Internet site of its own, on any other Internet site .
Ta sklic vključuje datum objave načrta delitve na spletni strani.
That reference shall include the date of the publication of the draft terms of division on the Internet site.
Države članice pa lahko zahtevajo, da se načrt delitve in/ali sklic, ki omogoča dostop do zadevnih spletnih strani, objavi v kakršni koli drugačni obliki, ki obstaja v državi članici, pod pogojem, da je ta dobro opredeljena in utemeljena na objektivnih pogojih, zlasti zaradi pravne varnosti in varnosti informacij ter ob upoštevanju razpoložljivosti dostopa do interneta in prakse v državi članici.
Member States may however require that draft terms of division and/or of a reference giving access to the Internet site be published in any other form of publication existing in the Member States, provided that it is well defined and based on objective conditions, particularly in the interest s of legal certainty and information security and having regard to the availability of access to the Internet and Member States' practice.
Člen 2 – točka 5 – točka (b)
Article 2 – point 5 – point b
„Če se delničar strinja, da lahko družba posreduje informacije z elektronskimi sredstvi, se lahko kopije pošljejo po elektronski pošti.“
"Where a shareholder has consented to the use, by the company, of electronic means for conveying information, the company may provide the copies by electronic mail."
Zaradi skladnosti s podobnim predlogom spremembe Direktive 78/855/EGS.
Consistency with similar amendment concerning Directive 78/855/EEC.
Člen 2 – točka 5 (c)
Article 2 – point 5 (c)
Od družbe se ne zahteva, da dokumente iz odstavka 1 da na voljo na svojem registriranem sedežu, če jih ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najmanj en mesec pred datumom skupščine delničarjev , na kateri se odloča o načrtu delitve, objavi na svoji spletni strani.
A company shall not be required to make the documents referred to in paragraph 1 available at its registered office if, for a continuous period beginning at least one month before the day of the general meeting which is to decide on the draft terms of division , it makes them available on its Internet site.
Če je družba to predvidela, spletna stran omogoča prenos in shranitev elektronske kopije teh dokumentov v celotnem obdobju iz tega odstavka .
Where a company makes use of this possibility, the Internet site shall permit the downloading and saving of an electronic copy of those documents, throughout the period referred to in this paragraph .
Države članice lahko določijo posledice začasno onemogočenega dostopa do spletne strani zaradi tehničnih ali drugih dejavnikov.
Member States may determine the consequences of temporary disruption of access to the Internet site caused by technical or other factors.
S predlogom spremembe je dodano tudi določilo, po katerem lahko države članice poiščejo rešitve za začasne prekinitve dostopa do spletne strani.
It also adds a provision allowing Member States to provide for the solutions to temporary disruptions to the website.
Direktiva 2005/56/ES
Directive 2005/56/EC
V členu 6(1) se doda naslednji pododstavek :
In Article 6(1), the following subparagraph is added:
„Objava v skladu s prvim pododstavkom se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najpozneje en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev objavi načrt združitve na svoji ali kateri koli drugi spletni strani.
"A publication in accordance with the first subparagraph shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning not later than one month before the day fixed for the general meeting, the company makes available the draft terms of merger on its own or on any other Internet site.
Sklic vključuje datum objave načrta združitve na spletni strani.“
The reference shall include the date of the publication of the draft terms of merger on the Internet site."
V členu 6(1) se dodajo naslednji pododstavki :
In Article 6(1), the following subparagraphs shall be added:
„Objava v skladu s prvim pododstavkom se od družbe ne zahteva, če ta za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najmanj en mesec pred datumom skupščine delničarjev , na kateri se odloča o skupnem načrtu čezmejne združitve, objavi skupni načrt takšne združitve na svoji spletni strani , in sicer v celoti ali pa v obliki sklica ali povezave, ali na kateri koli drugi spletni strani, če nima svoje .
"A publication in accordance with the first subparagraph shall not be required from a company if, for a continuous period beginning at least one month before the day of the general meeting which is to decide on the common draft terms of cross-border merger , the company makes available the common draft terms of such merger on its own Internet site in full or by way of reference or hyperlink or , if it has no Internet site of its own, on any other Internet site .
Sklic vključuje datum objave skupnega načrta čezmejne združitve na spletni strani.
The reference shall include the date of the publication of the common draft terms of cross-border merger on the Internet site.
Države članice pa lahko zahtevajo, da se skupni načrt čezmejne združitve in/ali sklic, ki omogoča dostop do zadevnih spletnih strani, objavi v kakršni koli drugačni obliki, ki obstaja v državi članici, pod pogojem, da je ta dobro opredeljena in utemeljena na objektivnih pogojih, zlasti zaradi pravne varnosti in varnosti informacij ter ob upoštevanju razpoložljivosti dostopa do interneta in prakse v državi članici.
Member States may however require that common draft terms of cross-border merger and/or of a reference giving access to the Internet site be published in any other form of publication existing in the Member States, provided that it is well defined and based on objective conditions, particularly in the interest s of legal certainty and information security and having regard to the availability of access to the Internet and Member States' practice.
Direktiva 2005/56/EGS
Directive 2005/56/EEC
V členu 15 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z:
In Article 15, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
Če čezmejno združitev s pripojitvijo izvede družba, ki ima v lasti 90 % ali več, ne pa vseh delnic in drugih vrednostnih papirjev z glasovalno pravico na skupščini delničarjev prevzete družbe ali prevzetih družb, se poročila neodvisnega izvedenca ali izvedencev in dokumenti, potrebni za pregled, zahtevajo samo v obsegu, zahtevanem z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki ureja družbo prevzemnico ali prevzeto družbo, v skladu z Direktivo 78/855/EGS.“
Where a cross-border merger by acquisition is carried out by a company which holds 90 % or more but not all of the shares and other securities conferring the right to vote at general meetings of the company or companies being acquired, reports by an independent expert or experts and the documents necessary for scrutiny shall be required only to the extent that the national law governing either the acquiring company or the company being acquired so requires, in accordance with Directive 78/855/EEC."
Edina sprememba v primerjavi z direktivo 2005/56/ES je dodatek „v skladu z direktivo 78/855/EGS“.
The only change compared to Directive 2005/56/EC is adding "in accordance with Directive 78/855/EEC".
Ta ni potreben in povzroča le zmedo.
This addition is not necessary and creates confusion.
Jasno je, da je zahteva določena v nacionalnem pravu, in sicer v skladu z določbami direktive.
It is clear that national law sets the requirement and that this is done in accordance with provisions of the Directive.
Določba o pregledu
Review clause
Pet let po datumu, določenem v členu 5(1), Komisija pregleda delovanje te direktive, zlasti zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev družb glede na izkušnje, pridobljene pri njenem izvajanju, ter pripravi poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, po potrebi skupaj s predlogi za nadaljnje spremembe.
Five years after the date laid down in Article 5(1), the Commission shall review the functioning of this Directive, and in particular its effects on the reduction of administrative burden s on companies, in the light of experience acquired in its application , and shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, if necessary, by proposals for its further amendment.
Komisija je v oceni učinka navedla, da bi bilo treba pet let po prenosu sprememb oceniti učinek ukrepov.
The Commission indicated in the Impact Assessment that five years after the transposition of the amendments the effect of the measures should be evaluated.
Besedilo bi moralo odražati to zavezo k spremljanju in oceni.
This monitoring and evaluation commitment should be reflected in the text.
Države članice najpozneje do 30. junija 2011 sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 30 June 2011 at the latest.
Države članice najpozneje do 30. junija 2013 sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 30 June 2013 at the latest.
Med uspešno vzpostavitvijo osrednje elektronske platforme in obveznostjo njene uporabe v skladu s predlogom za spremembo člena 3(4) prve direktive na področju prava družb, ki je v obravnavi, in začetkom izvajanja zahteve za objavo povezave in sklica mora preteči dovolj časa.
It is necessary that sufficient time is allowed between the central electronic platform is successfully established and becomes a mandatory tool under the pending proposal to amend Article 3(4) of the 1 CLD and the implementation of the obligation to publish a link and a reference.
Cilj predloga Komisije je pripomoči k večji konkurenčnosti družb EU z zmanjšanjem upravnih obremenitev, ki jih nalagajo direktive s področja prava družb („DPD“), kjer je to mogoče brez večjih negativnih učinkov na druge zainteresirane strani.
The objective of the Commission proposal is to contribute to enhancing the competitiveness of EU companies by reducing administrative burdens imposed under Company Law Directives ("CLD") where this can be done without major negative impact on other stakeholders.
Predlog se osredotoča na tretjo in šesto DPD (to sta direktivi Sveta 78/855/EGS in 82/891/EGS) v zvezi z domačimi združitvami in delitvami delniških družb.
The proposal focuses on the 3rd and 6th CLD (respectively, Council Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC) concerning domestic mergers and divisions of public limited liability companies.
Poleg tega Komisija predlaga tudi uskladitev direktive 2005/56/ES o čezmejnih združitvah s spremembami pravil za domače združitve.
In addition, the Commission proposed to align Directive 2005/56/EC concerning cross-border mergers with changes made to the domestic merger regime.
Poleg tega je predlaganih tudi nekaj sprememb druge DPD (direktiva Sveta 77/91/ES).
Furthermore, some amendments are proposed to the 2nd CLD (Council Directive 77/91/EC).
Tretja in šesta DPD vsebujeta zdaj veliko zahtev za podrobno poročanje, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati družbe, vključene v združitev ali delitev, in zaradi katerih imajo te družbe znatne stroške.
The 3rd and 6th CLD currently contain a number of detailed reporting requirements that companies involved in a merger or a division have to comply with and which impose considerable costs on them.
V določenih situacijah se te zahteve podvajajo z zahtevami iz druge DPD.
In certain situations, those requirements are doubled by requirements set out in 2nd CLD.
Nenazadnje so zaradi sprememb drugih direktiv v zadnjih letih in zlasti sprememb druge DPD na področju zaščite upnikov nastala nekatera neskladja med različnimi direktivami.
Finally, changes in other Directives during last years and in particular amendments made to the 2nd CLD in the area of creditor protection have lead to certain inconsistencies between different Directives.
Poročevalec pozdravlja predlog Komisije in podpira splošni cilj zmanjševanja upravnih obremenitev družb.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal and supports the general objective of reducing the administrative burden imposed on the companies.
Vseeno pa je po mnenju poročevalca treba zagotoviti tudi, da se v postopku izvajanja različne možnosti, ki so bile oblikovane v ta namen, učinkovito uporabljajo, da bosta dosežena zmanjšanje upravnih obremenitev in polna izraba potenciala poenostavljenih zahtev.
However, the rapporteur sees also the need to ensure that in the implementation process the various options designed for this purpose are effectively used in order to give effect to the reduction of the administrative burden and to use the potential of the simplification of the requirements to its full extent.
Treba je pripomniti, da bo dejansko zmanjšanje obremenitev odvisno od izvajanja in od možnosti, ki jih bodo izbrale države članice, družbe in delničarji sami.
It should be observed that the effective reduction of burdens will depend on the implementation and on the choices of options made by the Member States, companies and shareholders themselves.
Zaradi tega ni časa za oceno učinka sprememb direktiv, glede na njihovo pogostnost in roke za prenos.
This means that there is no time to evaluate the effects of changes made to the Directives, given their frequency and transposition deadlines.
Posebni preudarki
Specific considerations
Pravna podlaga predloga bi moral biti člen 44(2)(g) PES, kot je omenjeno v obrazložitvenemu memorandumu Komisije k predlogu.
The legal basis for the proposal should be Article 44(2)(g) TEC, as indicated in the Commission explanatory memorandum to the proposal.
Poenostavitev in uskladitev
Simplification and alignment
Poročevalec podpira prizadevanja za uskladitev določb direktiv, ki jih spreminja ta predlog, seveda v mejah mogočega.
The rapporteur supports the efforts to align, to the extent possible, provisions of Directives amended by the current proposal.
To se predvsem nanaša na:
This considers in particular:
- dosledne spremembe tretje in šeste DPD, ko gre za možnost soglasne opustitve obveznosti priprave poslovnega poročila v zvezi z načrtom združitve s strani delničarjev in imetnikov drugih vrednostnih papirjev z glasovalnimi pravicami;
- consistent amendment of the 3rd CLD and the 6th CLD when it refers to the possibility of a unanimous waiver of the obligation to draw up the management report concerning the draft terms of merger by the shareholders and holders of other securities giving right to vote;
- dobrodošlo uskladitev določb direktive 2005/56/ES z nedavnimi spremembami tretje in šeste DPD v zvezi z razkritjem načrta združitve;
- alignment of the provisions of Directive 2005/56/EC with the recent changes to the 3rd and 6th CLD concerning the disclosure of the draft terms of mergers is welcomed;
- preprečitev podvojevanj zahtev za izvedenska poročila v šesti in drugi DPD;
- elimination of duplication of requirements for experts' reports under the 6th and 2nd CLD;
- prilagoditev določil tretje in šeste DPD glede zaščite upnikov določilom druge DPD.
- adaptation of provisions of the 3rd and 6th CLD to 2nd CLD with respect to creditors protection.
Poročevalec se strinja z doslednim uvajanjem alternative mehanizmu za objavo iz prve direktive (direktiva Sveta 68/151/EGS) v tretjo, šesto in deseto direktivo.
The rapporteur agrees with the consistent introduction of an alternative to the publication mechanism of the 1st Directive (Council Directive 68/151/EEC) in the 3rd, 6th and 10th Directives.
To alternativo pa bi bilo treba omejiti na spletno stran družbe.
This alternative should be however limited to the companies own website.
Spletna stran družbe se zdi naravno in očitno mesto, kamor se delničar in/ali upnik obrne pri iskanju dokumentov in podatkov o družbi.
It seems a natural and obvious place for the shareholder and/or creditor to look at the company's website in search of documents and information concerning it.
Treba je poudariti, da bo ta možnost, skupaj z obveznostjo objave sklica in povezave na osrednji elektronski platformi, omogočila uspešno sprostitev zahteve po objavi le, če bo osrednji elektronski platformi uspelo postati obvezno orodje na podlagi predloga Komisije za spremembo člena 3(4) prve DPD (COM(2008)33), ki je v obravnavi.
It should be emphasized that this possibility combined with the obligation to publish on the central electronic platform a reference and a link will only provide a viable reduction of publication requirement if the central electronic platform will successfully become a mandatory tool as a result of the pending Commission proposal to amend Article 3(4) of the 1st CLD (COM(2008)33).
Rezultat tega predloga še ni znan.
The outcome of this proposal is still unknown.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti tudi skrbi zaradi rokov za izvajanje direktive v sedanjem predlogu in spremembe člena 3(4) prve DPD.
In this context the concerns about the implementation deadlines of the Directive under the current proposal and of the amendment of Article 3(4) of the 1st CLD should also be stressed.
Med vzpostavitvijo osrednje elektronske platforme in začetkom izvajanja zahteve za objavo povezave in sklica mora preteči dovolj časa.
It is necessary that sufficient time is allowed between the central electronic platform is established and the implementation of the obligation to publish a link and a reference.
Vseeno pa poročevalec podpira uvedbo te zahteve za objavo, ki zagotavlja preglednost.
Nevertheless, the rapporteur supports the introduction of that publishing obligation, which ensures transparency.
Zagotoviti bi morala tudi datum objave (t.j. datum spletne objave), kar bi morala omogočati osrednja elektronska platforma.
It should also ensure certainty as to the date of publication (i.e., the date of the website publication) which would also have to be provided on the central electronic platform.
Namen mnogih določb tretje in šeste DPD je bila zaščita pravic delničarjev.
Many provisions of the 3rd and 6th CLD were designed to protect the rights of shareholders.
Vsakršno zmanjšanje obvez družb bi zato moralo upoštevati interes delničarjev za pridobitev informacij.
Any reduction in obligations for companies should therefore take into account the interest of the shareholders in obtaining information.
Ko se odloča o načinu obveščanja delničarjev, bi bilo treba obravnavati dostopnost za delničarje in morebitne stroške dostopa.
When the question is asked about the means to inform shareholders the accessibility for shareholders and possible access costs should be considered.
Zaradi tega poročevalec meni, da bi bilo treba zmanjšanje stroškov družb z omogočanjem spletnega dostopa do dokumentov združiti z zaščito interesa delničarjev, da na zahtevo prejmejo dokumente v izbrani obliki.
For this reason your rapporteur believes that the reduction of costs by the companies by making documents accessible on-line should be combined with the protection of the interest of shareholders to obtain documents in the preferred form on their request.
Pripravljavec mnenja pozdravlja predlog Komisije o direktivi za poenostavitev zahtev za poročanje v primeru združitev in delitev nekaterih evropskih podjetij.
The rapporteur welcomes the proposal from the Commission for a directive to simplify reporting requirements for mergers and divisions of certain European businesses.
Take pobude, s ciljem zmanjšanja neupravičenih upravnih obremenitev za evropska podjetja, so zlasti dobro sprejete glede na sedanje tržne pogoje, ko sta zlasti pomembni učinkovitost evropskih podjetij in globalna konkurenčnost.
Such initiatives which aim at reducing undue administrative burdens to European businesses are particularly well-received in the context of the current market conditions, when European firms' efficiency and global competitiveness are of particular importance.
Čeprav rešitve, ki jih je v tej direktivi predlagala Komisija, ne pomenijo bistvene prenove zakonodaje, vseeno pomenijo manjše korake v pravo smer.
Although the solutions proposed by the Commission in this directive do not constitute a major legislative overhaul, they do represent small steps in the right direction.
Pravzaprav je pripravljavec mnenja zlasti zadovoljen, ker predlog upošteva mnenje Parlamenta iz resolucije, ki je bila sprejeta 21. maja 2008 in je bila načeloma bolj naklonjena omejenemu področju uporabe, kar je dejanski ukrep za poenostavitev, namesto celotne ali delne razveljavitve direktiv EU o pravu družb
In fact, the rapporteur is particularly pleased to see that the proposal takes into account the Parliament's sentiment expressed in a resolution adopted on 21 May 2008, which contained a preference in principle for limited-scope, concrete simplification measures instead of a total or partial repeal of the EU company law directives
„Poenostavljeno poslovno okolje za podjetja na področjih prava družb, računovodstva in revidiranja“ ( 2007/2254(INI) ). .
"Simplified business environment for companies in the areas of company law, accounting and auditing" ( 2007/2254(INI) ). .
Resolucija z dne 21. maja 2008 je tudi poudarila pomen ustreznega upoštevanja interesa vseh zainteresiranih strani.
The resolution from 21 May 2008 also highlighted the importance of duly taking into account the interest of all stakeholders.