natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3. meni, da so posvetovanja in ocene učinka bistvenega pomena za boljšo zakonodajo Skupnosti ter da ne bi smeli pomeniti dodatne birokratske obremenitve niti ovir, ki Komisiji preprečujejo ukrepanje; nasprotno, pomagale naj bi vzpostaviti trden pravni okvir, ki prispeva k rasti v Evropski uniji;
Considers that consultations and impact assessments are essential to better drafted Community legislation and that they should not neither add to bureaucracy nor present bureaucratic stumbling blocks preventing the Commission from acting but that they should, rather, help establish a sound legal framework that is conducive to growth in the European Union;
5. meni, da bi morala Parlament in Komisija pri pripravi predlogov sprememb upoštevati oceno učinka Komisije in lastne ocene učinka, da bi se izboljšala kakovost priprave zakonodaje;
Is of the opinion that while proposing their amendments Parliament and the Council should take into account both the Commission's and their own impact assessments in order to improve the quality of the drafting of legislation;
8. poudarja, da bi morali nezakonodajni ukrepi spoštovati ravnotežje moči in vloge posameznih institucij; želi, da Parlament preudarno in usklajeno prispeva k takim ukrepom ter da gradi na preteklih izkušnjah; poudarja potrebo po politični potrditvi takih inovativnih ukrepov;
Underlines that non-legislative measures should respect the balance of power and the respective roles of the institutions; wants the Parliament to make a wise and coherent contribution to such measures, building on experience; stresses the need for political endorsement of such innovative measures;
o nacionalnem, regionalnem in projektnem vodenju ter partnerstvu na področju regionalne politike
on governance and partnership at national and regional levels and a basis for projects in the sphere of regional policy
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor .............................................................14
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL...................................16
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................17
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE....................................................................19
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zlasti členov 158 in 159,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular articles 158 and 159 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 15,
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular Article 15 thereof,
25. (v nadaljevanju „splošna uredba o strukturnih skladih“), zlasti člena 11 z naslovom „Partnerstvo“,
25. (hereinafter named the General Regulation on the Structural Funds) and in particular Article 11, entitled ‘Partnership’, thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Teritorialne agende Evropske unije, Leipziške listine o trajnostnih evropskih mestih ter prvega akcijskega programa za izvajanje Teritorialne agende Evropske unije,
– having regard to the Territorial Agenda of the European Union, the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities, and the First Action Programme for the Implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju študije tematskega oddelka „Strukturne in kohezijske politike“ Evropskega parlamenta z naslovom „Upravljanje in partnerstvo v regionalni politiki“,
– having regard to the study drawn up by the European Parliament’s Policy Department on Structural and Cohesion Policies entitled ‘Governance and partnership in the sphere of regional policy’,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij (COTER–…) in mnenja Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora o upravljanju in partnerstvu (CESE 1177/2008),
– having regard to the opinions of the Committee of the Regions (COTER-...) and of the European Economic and Social Committee on governance and partnership (EESC 1177/2008),
– ob upoštevanju raziskovalnega mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z naslovom „Za uravnotežen razvoj mestnega okolja: izzivi in priložnosti“ (CESE 737/2008),
– having regard to the exploratory opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee entitled ‘Towards balanced development of the urban environment: challenges and opportunities’ (EESC 737/2008),
– ob upoštevanju praktičnih navodil Komisije za evropsko financiranje raziskav, razvoja in inovacij,
– having regard to the Commission’s ‘Practical guide to EU funding for research, development and innovation’,
– ob upoštevanju druge faze programa URBACT (2007–2013), evropskega programa za spodbujanje izmenjave izkušenj med evropskimi mesti, zlasti sedmih novih tematskih omrežij s področja upravljanja,
– having regard to the second cycle of the URBACT programme (2007-2013), a European programme whose aim is to foster exchanges of experience between European towns and cities, and in particular the seven new thematic networks dealing with governance,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj in mnenja Odbora za nadzor proračuna ( A6-0356/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0356/2008 ),
A. ker so interesi in dobro počutje državljanov v središču evropskih nacionalnih in regionalnih politik, izboljšana raven vodenja in partnerstva, ki stremi k izboljšanju ravni uskladitve in sodelovanja med različnimi organi, pa prinaša koristi vsem evropskim državljanom,
A. whereas the interest and well-being of citizens lie at the centre of European, national and regional policies, and whereas an improved level of governance and partnership, aimed at establishing an improved level of coordination and cooperation between the various authorities, is to the benefit of all European citizens,
B. ker je mogoče praktične rešitve v zvezi z javnimi storitvami (javni prevoz, pitna voda, socialna stanovanja in javno izobraževanje), ki jih pričakujejo naši sodržavljani, pridobiti le na podlagi dobrega upravljanja na ravni dveh komplementarnih sistemov: institucionalnega sistema, v okviru katerega se pristojnosti in proračunska sredstva porazdelijo med državo ter regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, ter sistema partnerstva, ki združuje različne javne in zasebne akterje na določenem območju, ki se ukvarjajo z enako tematiko,
B. whereas the practical solutions which our fellow citizens expect to see as regards public services (such as public transport, drinking water, social housing and public education) can be achieved only by means of good governance, involving two complementary systems: firstly, the institutional system, which provides for the allocation of powers and budgets between the State and regional and local authorities; and, secondly, the partnership system, which brings together all the public and private bodies concerned by a given topic in a given territory,
C. ker je treba opozoriti na definicijo partnerstva iz splošne uredbe o strukturnih skladih, v skladu s katero mora vsaka država članica organizirati partnerstvo z organi in telesi, kot so:
C. whereas attention should be drawn to the definition of ‘partnership’ as contained in the General Regulation on the Structural Funds, pursuant to which each Member State shall organise a partnership with authorities and bodies such as:
a) pristojni regionalni, lokalni, mestni in drugi pristojni javni organi;
(a) the competent regional, local, urban and other public authorities,
b) gospodarski in socialni partnerji;
(b) the economic and social partners,
c) drugi ustrezni organi, ki predstavljajo civilno družbo, okoljski partnerji, nevladne organizacije in telesa, odgovorna za spodbujanje enakosti med moškimi iz ženskami,
(c) any other appropriate body representing civil society, environmental partners, non-governmental organisations and bodies responsible for promoting equality between men and women,
D. ker lahko partnerstvo, ki mora upoštevati vse skupnosti in skupine, prinese ugodnosti in dodano vrednost za izvajanje kohezijske politike z okrepljeno legitimnostjo, zagotovljeno preglednostjo in boljšo porabo sredstev, oceniti pa ga je treba tudi z vidika njegove družbene in državljanske vrednosti;
D. whereas partnership, which should take account of all relevant communities and groups, can bring benefit and added value to the implementation of cohesion policy through enhanced legitimacy, guaranteed transparency and better absorption of funds, and it should also be assessed in terms of the social and civic value it represents,
E. ker bo najtesnejše možno sodelovanje različnih partnerjev pri pripravi osnutka operativnih programov omogočilo oblikovanje dokumenta, ki bo popolnoma upošteval posebnosti danega ozemlja ter zagotovil najboljši možni odgovor na zahteve in izzive na tem območju,
E. whereas the closest possible involvement of the various partners in the drafting of operational programmes will ensure the production of a document that takes full account of the specific features of a given territory and provides the best possible response to the requirements and challenges in that area,
F. ker je lahko okrepljeno partnerstvo z univerzami ter inštituti na ravni terciarnega izobraževanja ali inštituti za tehnologijo, pa tudi vključitev zasebnega sektorja, ugodno za strategije v okviru lizbonske agende in politike EU na področju raziskav in inovacij,
F. whereas an enhanced partnership with universities and institutes of tertiary or technological education, as well as private sector involvement, can be beneficial to strategies within the framework of the Lisbon Agenda and EU policies dealing with research and innovation,
G. ker je družbeni kapital v obliki prostovoljnega dela neločljivo povezan z regionalno gospodarsko rastjo in je pomemben dejavnik pri zmanjševanju razlik med regijami,
G. whereas social capital in the form of active volunteering is positively linked to regional economic growth and is an important factor in reducing regional disparities,
H. ker se lahko na podlagi večje vključenosti partnerjev, omenjenih v splošni uredbi o strukturnih skladih, in boljšega sodelovanja med akterji pri izvajanju programov in projektov, financiranih iz strukturnih skladov in kohezijskega sklada, izboljša učinkovitost kohezijske politike in poveča njen učinek,
H. whereas the extensive participation of the partners mentioned in the General Regulation on the Structural Funds and closer cooperation among the bodies involved in implementing programmes and projects financed from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Funds would serve to make cohesion policy more effective and to increase the leverage effect,
I. ker je treba pri celovitem pristopu ne le upoštevati gospodarski, socialni in okoljski vidik razvoja območij, temveč tudi prispevati k uskladitvi interesov različnih udeleženih akterjev ob upoštevanju posebnosti območij, s čimer se bo mogoče odzvati na izzive na lokalni in regionalni ravni,
I. whereas an integrated approach must not only take account of the economic, social and environmental aspects of territorial development, but must also serve to reconcile the interests of the various actors involved, in the light of a territory’s specific characteristics, with a view to meeting local and regional challenges,
J. ker sta boljša usklajenost različnih področij javne politike na vseh ustreznih ravneh uprave ter uspešno vodenje bistvena za doseganje trajnostnega razvoja območij,
J. whereas both better coordination of the relevant public policies, at all the administrative levels concerned, and effective governance are essential if the sustainable development of territories is to be moved forward,
K. ker je zato nujen koncept celovitega pristopa, ki ga je treba sedaj izvajati v praksi,
K. whereas the concept of an integrated approach is now regarded as a necessity, and whereas it is now time to put that concept into practice,
L. ker je bila strukturna politika drugi največji del proračuna Evropske unije v programskem obdobju 2000–2006 in je glavno področje politike Unije v obdobju 2007–2013,
L. whereas structural policies were the second largest part of the European Union budget in the programming period 2000-2006 and are the major policies of the European Union in the 2007-2013 period,
M. ker je primerno organizirati učinkovitejše in za vse preglednejše delovanje med različnimi javnimi in zasebnimi organi, ne da bi bilo treba pri tem nujno prenesti zakonske pristojnosti in ustanoviti nove skupnosti, da bi bile vse zainteresirane strani na podlagi sodelovanja učinkovitejše,
M. whereas arrangements should be made for closer cooperation and transparency for all among the various authorities and public and private bodies involved, without necessarily transferring legal powers and without creating new authorities, thereby enabling each body to work more effectively as a result of that cooperation,
N. ker je treba razmisliti o možnosti udeležbe regionalnih in lokalnih organov, in sicer čim prej pred pogajanji o zakonodaji Skupnosti, še zlasti pa v okviru pogajanj o prihodnjem kohezijskem zakonodajnem paketu,
N. whereas the involvement of regional and local authorities must be envisaged at the earliest possible stage of negotiations on Community legislation and, in particular, in the negotiations on the next package of cohesion policy rules,
O. ker pomeni pojem gravitacijskih območij upoštevanje ustreznih ključnih območij pri obravnavi vprašanj, ki so bistveno povezana z vsakdanjim življenjem državljanov (prevoz, javne storitve, kakovost življenja, zaposlitev in lokalne ekonomske dejavnosti, varnost itd.),
O. whereas applying the concept of ‘population and labour catchment areas’ involves taking account of the relevant basic territorial units when addressing issues of fundamental importance to people’s daily lives, (transport, public services, quality of life, jobs and local economic activity, security, etc.),
P. ker lahko uporaba pravilnega prostorskega načrtovanja prispeva k učinkovitemu upravljanju,
P. whereas effective governance can be facilitated through the use of proper spatial planning,
Q. ker je poznavanje projektnega vodenja s strani akterjev izvajanja kohezijske politike bistveno za izboljšanje in olajšanje upravljanja,
Q. whereas the fact that the individuals involved in implementing cohesion policy have project management skills is a key factor in improving and facilitating governance,
R. ker je treba upoštevati tudi pozitivne izkušnje iz uporabe novih metod upravljanja in partnerstva, vključno s tistimi, ki so že bile uspešno preizkušene v programih evropskih skladov, kot so metoda LEADER in globalna nepovratna sredstva (iz členov 42 in 43 splošne uredbe o strukturnih skladih),
R. whereas the results of successful experiments involving new methods of governance and partnership should be drawn on in the future, including those which have already been successfully tested in European Fund programmes, such as the LEADER method and the global grant (pursuant to Articles 42 and 43 of the General Regulation on the Structural Funds),
S. ker ustrezne komunikacijske strukture in strategije na vseh stopnjah politike, izvajanja in ocenjevanja, zasnovane v tesnem sodelovanju z regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, s spodbujanjem širjenja informacij med vse sloje družbe, povečuje preglednost, udeležbo za vse in polno lastništvo,
S. whereas adequate communication structures and strategies at all policy, implementation and evaluation stages, designed in close cooperation with regional and local authorities, by promoting the spread of information to all sections of society, foster transparency, inclusive participation and full ownership,
Upravljanje in skladi Skupnosti
Governance and Community funds
6. poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja uporabo člena 56 splošne uredbe strukturnih skladih, ki omogočajo prispevke v naravi za projekte, ki jih sofinancira Evropska unija;
Calls on the Commission to promote the use of Article 56 of the General Regulation on the Structural Funds, which allows for contributions in kind to European Union co-financed projects;
Upravljanje in partnerstvo
Governance and partnership
8. poziva Komisijo, naj izdela smernice z jasno definicijo in merili za ocenitev ter z navedbo instrumentov, orodij in dobrih praks (med drugim za izbiro partnerjev), ki bodo olajšali izvajanje učinkovitih partnerstev v skladu s členom 11 splošne uredbe o strukturnih skladih, pri čemer bo upoštevala institucionalni okvir vseh držav članic;
Calls on the Commission to draw up a guide containing a clear definition and assessment criteria as well as setting out instruments, tools and good practices (among others for the selection of partners) designed to facilitate the implementation of effective partnerships in accordance with Article 11 of the General Regulation on Structural Funds in keeping with the institutional framework specific to each Member State;
10. obžaluje, da za sedanje programsko obdobje iz strukturnih skladov ni bil dodeljen izmerljiv minimalni znesek za izvajanje načela partnerstva; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj v prihodnjem zakonodajnem obdobju za izvajanje tega načela iz strukturnih skladov namenita izmerljiv minimalni znesek sredstev;
Regrets that for the current programming period no quantifiable minimum of the Structural Funds has been earmarked for implementation of the partnership principle; calls on the Council and the Commission to earmark in future legislation a quantifiable minimum of the Structural Funds for implementation of the partnership principle;
15. poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo tesnejše sodelovanje med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem z vzpostavitvijo javno-zasebnih partnerstev za izvajanje strukturnih skladov, saj so možne koristi teh partnerstev še vedno precej slabo izkoriščene;
Urges the Member States to ensure closer cooperation between public and private sectors through the establishment of public-private partnerships to implement structural funding, given that the potential benefits deriving from public-private partnerships are still largely underexploited;
18. poziva države članice, naj čim prej izdelajo konkretne ukrepe prvega akcijskega programa za izvajanje teritorialne agende Evropske unije, zlasti v skladu s postavko 3.1, da bi s tem okrepile večstopenjsko upravljanje;
Calls on the Member States to develop as quickly as possible the practical measures set out in the First Action Programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union, in particular under heading 3.1, with a view to strengthening multi-level governance;
23. poziva nacionalna računska sodišča, naj prevzamejo odločnejšo vlogo pri nadzornih mehanizmih, da bi zagotovila primerno porabo sredstev ter sprejela svoje obveznosti in delovala bolj dejavno;
Calls for the national courts of auditors to play a stronger role in the control mechanisms, to ensure that funds are appropriately spent, so as to accept their responsibilities and play a more active part;
Upravljanje in teritorialna razsežnost
Governance and the territorial dimension
- gravitacijska območja, tj. mesta, primestna območja in okoliška podeželska območja;
– population and labour catchment areas, i.e. towns, suburban areas and the adjacent rural areas;
- območja, za katera so upravičeni posebni tematski pristopi, kot so gorski masivi, obsežna gozdna območja, nacionalni parki, porečja, obalna območja, otoške regije in okoljsko degradirana območja, da bi zanje razvili posebne pristope;
– territories which justify specific thematic approaches, such as mountain ranges, large wooded areas, national parks, river basins, coastal areas, island regions and environmentally degraded areas, to develop place-based approaches;
Upravljanje in institucije Evropske unije
Governance and the European Union institutions
30. se zavezuje, da bo preučil prilagoditev poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta, s čimer bi omogočil navzkrižno obravnavanje vprašanj na področjih, za katera je pristojnih več parlamentarnih odborov (začasnih ali drugih), zlasti v okviru delovanja delovne skupine za parlamentarno reformo;
Undertakes to consider changes to its Rules of Procedure to make provision, by means of temporary working groups or other bodies, for cross‑departmental work on topics involving several parliamentary committees, in particular in the context of the proceedings of the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform;
Orodja za spodbujanje učinkovitega upravljanja in partnerstva
Calls on the Committee of the Regions to step up its efforts to develop the practice of governance, in both quantitative and qualitative terms;
36. pozdravlja pobudo francoskega predsedstva Unije, da sproži postopek za oblikovanje referenčnega sistema za trajnostno in solidarno mesto, ter poziva, naj se v tem referenčnem sistemu upošteva razsežnost upravljanja in partnerstva;
Welcomes the launching by the French Presidency the European Union of a project to draw up a set of benchmarks for urban sustainability and solidarity and calls for the governance and partnership dimension to be included in those benchmarks;
Potreba po upravljanju za nadaljevanje trajnostnega razvoja
The need for governance as a means of moving sustainable development forward
Za uspešen regionalni razvoj ne zadostuje soglasje o tem, kaj storiti , temveč je bistveno vzpostaviti mehanizem, ki bo odgovoril na vprašanje kako storiti , kar je upravljanje.
If regional development is to be successful, it is not enough simply to reach agreement on what needs to be done , but rather it is vital to determine how it should be done , and that it what is meant by governance.
Regionalna in mestna politika morata biti del strategije za doseganje celostnega razvoja.
Regional and urban policies must form part of an integrated development strategy.
Vzpostaviti je treba mehanizme, s katerimi bomo zagotovili, da si različne politike med seboj ne bi nasprotovale.
Mechanisms are needed to ensure that all the various policies pull in the same direction.
Nadaljnji trajnostni razvoj regij je mogoč le z izboljšanjem upravljanja.
Moving sustainable development of territories is contingent on improved governance.
Načrtovanje in izvajanje regionalnega razvoja v praksi pogosto naleti na umetne delitve med javnimi organi (država, regije, občine idr.), ki imajo svoja pooblastila, proračunska sredstva in časovne načrte.
On the ground, the work of planning and implementing regional development is often hampered by divisions between public authorities (the State, regions, municipalities and others) which have their own powers, budgets and timetables.
Geografske in upravne omejitve ne ustrezajo nujno območjem, ki potrebujejo usklajen odziv na področju transporta, izobraževanja, socialnih stanovanj ter na drugih področjih.
Geographical and administrative boundaries do not necessarily tally with the limits of a territory which requires an integrated response in the areas of transport, education, social housing, etc.
Zato se morajo strukture odzvati na potrebe državljanov v svetu, ki je vedno bolj soodvisen in se hitro razvija.
In an increasingly interdependent and rapidly changing world, therefore, structures need to be tailored to the needs of ordinary people.
Evropska unija kot preobrazbena sila upravljanja
The European Union as a transforming force in the area of governance
Evropska unija je močno izboljšala upravljanje v različnih državah članicah.
The European Union has brought about substantial changes in governance in the Member States.
Njena politika, zlasti na področju kohezijske politike, je spodbudila proces preobrazbe upravljanja iz sistema, ki je pogosto centraliziran in (geografsko, pa tudi sektorsko) zaprt, v sistem, ki je čedalje bolj navzoč na več ravneh.
European policies, and more particularly cohesion policy, have transformed governance from an often centralised system characterised by compartmentalisation (both geographical and sectoral) into an increasingly integrated, multi-level system.