natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlagano zmanjšanje večjih plačil je nezadostno in neučinkovito; izvaja se napačno in na osnovi neobstoječih meril.
The proposed reduction in large payments is insubstantial and ineffective; it is being carried out in the wrong way on the basis of non-existent criteria.
Menimo, da je treba nemudoma sprejeti ukrepe, ki bodo podpirali dohodke malih in srednje velikih podjetij, zlasti na zapostavljenih območjih, in bodo zagotavljali čim tesnejšo povezavo med pomočjo in proizvodnjo.
We consider that immediate measures must be taken to support the income of small and medium-sized holdings, particularly in disadvantaged regions, and to secure the strongest possible link between aid and production.
Merilo za te ukrepe morajo biti prehrambena neodvisnost držav članic, zagotavljanje primernih količin zdravih in varnih živil po nizkih cenah, varstvo okolja in narave ter preprečevanje bega prebivalstva s podeželja z zagotavljanjem dostojnih pogojev za življenje.
The criteria on which the measures should be based should be the self-sufficiency of Member States in food, securing adequate supplies of healthy and safe food at low prices, respect for the environment and nature, and maintaining the rural population by providing decent living conditions.
o sistematskem pregledu skupne kmetijske politike
on the Health Check on the CAP
1. poudarja pomen uspešnega kmetijskega sektorja in učinkovitega podeželskega okolja v EU, ne samo zaradi gospodarskih razlogov, ampak tudi zaradi ohranitve krajine in varnosti preskrbe s hrano;
Stresses the importance of a thriving agricultural sector and a viable rural environment in the EU, not only for economic reasons but also with a view to the preservation of the landscape and food security;
3. meni, da je pomembno, da se v ta namen kmetijstvo razvija v smeri večfunkcionalnega in trajnostnega kmetijstva, ki kmete spodbuja k uporabi okoljsko trajnostnih praks kmetovanja (še zlasti pri ohranjevalnem in ekološkem kmetijstvu);
Considers it necessary, to that end, to develop in the direction of a sustainable, multifunctional agriculture in which farmers are encouraged to use environmentally sustainable agricultural methods (in particular conservation farming and organic farming);
7. poudarja, da ima v sedanjem programskem obdobju 2007-2013 razvoj podeželja (in njegov finančni instrument Evropski sklad za razvoj podeželja) kot drugi steber SKP pomemben regionalni vpliv; poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi možnosti za skladnejše izvajanje programov s področja regionalne politike (strukturni skladi), da se na področjih, kjer je sinergija možna, doseže celostni pristop;
Points out that in the current programming period 2007-2013, rural development (and its financing instrument EARDF) as the second pillar of CAP has an important regional impact; urges the Commission to exploit the possibilities for a more coherent implementation in relation to the regional policy programmes (structural funds) in order to come to an integrated approach in fields where synergy can be obtained;
9. meni, da lahko nevezana neposredna pomoč iz kmetijske proizvodnje dolgoročno prispeva k zmanjšanju negativnega vpliva evropskega kmetijstva na okolje, če jo spremlja okrepljena podpora za trajnostne prakse razvoja podeželja;
Believes that decoupling direct aid from agricultural production can in the long term contribute to reducing the negative environmental impact of European agriculture, provided that it is accompanied by strengthened support for sustainable practices in rural development;
15. poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši ukrepe prenosa raziskav in tehnologije, da bo zlasti spodbujala pridelovalne metode, ki bodo prijazne do okolja in ekosistemov in bodo v interesu trajnostnega kmetijstva;
Calls on the Commission to step up research and technology transfer measures in order, in particular, to promote more environment and ecosystem friendly production methods in the interests of sustainable agriculture;
17. izpostavlja uspešne projekte po EU, kjer je kmetom, okoljskim skupinam in organom s pomočjo sodelovanja na lokalni in regionalni ravni uspelo znižati vpliv okolja na kmetijstvo.
Draws attention to successful projects around the EU where cooperation at the local and regional level between farmers, environmental groups and authorities have successfully reduced the environmental impact of agriculture.
Date sprejetja
Date adopted
o poročilu o napredku Hrvaške za leto 2007
on Croatia's 2007 progress report
– ob upoštevanju sklepa, ki ga je sprejel Svet dne 3. oktobra 2005, da s Hrvaško začne pristopna pogajanja,
– having regard to the decision adopted by the Council on 3 October 2005 to open accession negotiations with Croatia ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. aprila 2007 o poročilu o napredku Hrvaške za leto 2006
– having regard to its resolution of 25 April 2007 on Croatia 's 2006 progress report
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0156 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0156 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o napredku Hrvaške za leto 2007, ki ga je Komisija objavila 8. novembra 2007 ( SEC(2006)1431 ),
– having regard to the Croatia 2007 Progress Report, published by the Commission on 6 November 2007 ( SEC(2007)1431 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose z dne 10. decembra 2007 v zvezi s Hrvaško,
– having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 10 December 2007 concerning Croatia ,
– ob upoštevanju obiska delegacije Odbora za zunanje zadeve na Hrvaškem 6. in 7. februarja 2008,
– having regard to the visit of a delegation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs to Croatia on 6-7 February 2008,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6–0048/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6 ‑0048/2008),
A. ker članstvo v Evropski uniji vključuje obvezo, da je treba premagati obstoječe razdeljenosti in doseči spravo med narodi, kar pomeni prostovoljen prenos pooblastil na nekaterih ključnih političnih področjih, in ker so bila prizadevanja Hrvaška v zvezi s tem znatna in uspešna ter so prinesla vidne rezultate,
A. whereas membership of the European Union involves a commitment to overcoming existing divisions and achieving reconciliation between peoples, all of which entails a voluntary delegation of powers in certain key policy areas, and whereas Croatia has made substantial and successful efforts in this regard, which have produced visible results,
B. ker ima proces pristopa Hrvaške k EU širše regionalne posledice ter se obravnava kot preskus obvez, ki jih je EU prevzela v zvezi z zahodnim Balkanom, in lahko postane pomembna spodbuda za vse ostale zadevne države,
B. whereas Croatia’s EU accession process has wider regional implications, is seen as a test of the commitments made by the EU to the Western Balkans, and may become a significant incentive for all other countries concerned,
C ker je resna zavezanost Hrvaške pristopnim pogajanjem obrodila sadove, kar je dober znak za proces integracije Hrvaške, pa tudi ostalih držav v regiji v EU,
C. whereas Croatia 's serious commitment to accession negotiations has borne fruit and bodes well for the EU integration process of Croatia as well as of other countries in the region,
D. ker je Hrvaška v zadnjih dveh letih pogajanj bistveno in hvalevredno napredovala na večini področij, zajetih v pravnem redu Skupnosti,
D. whereas in the past two years of negotiation Croatia has made substantial and commendable progress in most areas covered by the corpus of Community law,
E. ker so potrebna še večja prizadevanja in obnovljena politična zavezanost za obravnavanje nekaterih bolj problematičnih sektorjev, v katerih so potrebne korenite reforme, preden Hrvaška lahko pristopi k Evropski uniji,
E. whereas increased efforts and renewed political commitment are required in order to address some of the more problematic sectors where serious reforms are necessary before Croatia can join the European Union,
E. ker sklepi Evropskega sveta v Solunu leta 2003 nakazujejo, da je prihodnost vseh držav zahodnega Balkana dejansko v Evropski uniji, kar potrjujejo številne resolucije Evropskega parlamenta,
F. whereas the conclusions of the 2003 European Council in Thessaloniki indicates that the future of all the Western Balkan countries lies effectively in the European Union, as confirmed in a number of the European Parliament's resolutions,
G. ker izjava, ki so jo podale EU in države zahodnega Balkana ter so jo 11. marca 2006 v Salzburgu soglasno potrdili zunanji ministri Evropske unije in zunanji ministri držav zahodnega Balkana, poudarja pomen dobrih sosedskih odnosov ter potrebo po iskanju vzajemno sprejemljivih rešitev za odprta vprašanja s sosednjimi državami,
G. whereas the statement issued by the EU and the Western Balkan countries, unanimously approved by the Foreign Ministers of the European Union and the Western Balkan countries on 11 March 2006 in Salzburg, underscores the importance of good neighbourly relations and the need to find mutually acceptable solutions to outstanding issues with neighbouring countries,
6. želi pohvaliti korake, storjene na ključnem področju reforme pravosodja, vendar soglaša z mnenjem Komisije, da so potrebne nadaljnje izboljšave, zlasti glede:
Commends the steps which have been taken in the crucial area of judicial reform, but shares the Commission's view that further improvements are necessary, particularly with a view to:
– nadaljnjega zmanjševanja sodnih zaostankov, ne nazadnje z odločnejšim spodbujanjem sodnikov, naj uporabijo alternativne oblike reševanja sporov;
– further reducing the backlog of pending cases, not least by promoting more vigorously amongst judges recourse to alternative forms of dispute resolution;
– povečanja neodvisnosti, nepristranskosti in profesionalnosti sodstva, zlasti v zvezi z imenovanjem sodnikov in državnih pravobranilcev ter upravljanjem njihovih karier, vključno z usposabljanjem;
– enhancing the independence, impartiality and professionalism of the judiciary, in particular the appointment and management of the careers of judges and state attorneys, including training;
– dodatnega spodbujanja postopka racionalizacije sodišč in zagotavljanja, da so naložbe v infrastrukturo v skladu z novo oblikovanim načrtom organizacije sodišč;
– giving renewed impetus to the process of rationalising the court system and ensuring that infrastructural investments are in keeping with the newly developed "judicial map";
11. čestita Hrvaški za vzorni ustavni zakon o nacionalnih manjšinah in izraža pohvalo ukrepom, ki so bili sprejeti za olajšanje vključevanja manjšin v skupno družbeno in politično življenje;
Congratulates Croatia on its exemplary Constitutional Law on National Minorities (CLNM) and commends it for the measures taken to facilitate the integration of minorities into mainstream social and political life;
14. opozarja, da je treba zagotoviti ustrezno izvajanje ustavnega zakona za narodne manjšine, zlasti v zvezi z dvojezičnim poukom v šolah in dvojezičnostjo v javni upravi ter načrtovanimi zagotovili za ustrezno zastopanost manjšin med zaposlenimi v sodstvu in javni upravi;
Recalls, moreover, the need to ensure effective implementation of the CLNM, particularly with regard to bilingual teaching in schools and bilingualism in public administration and the planned employment guarantees concerning the adequate representation of minorities within the judiciary and public administration;
19. pozdravlja reforme, sprejete na področju varovanja okolja; poziva vlado, naj razmisli o ukrepih in politikah za obravnavo škodljivih posledic podnebnih sprememb v skladu s cilji EU; poziva k vzpostavitvi celovitejšega medsektorskega dialoga, da se zagotovi okoljsko trajnostni razvoj;
Welcomes the reforms adopted in the environmental protection sector; calls on the government to consider measures and policies addressing the detrimental effects of climate change, in line with EU targets; calls for the establishment of a more comprehensive inter-sectoral dialogue to ensure ecologically sustainable development:
22. vztraja, da je treba novo zakonodajo hitro izvajati, saj je s tem zagotovljeno zanesljivo merilo za ocenjevanje pripravljenosti države na članstvo, in sicer pripravljenosti, ki temelji na dejstvih, ne le na sprejeti zakonodaji, zlasti kar se tiče reforme pravosodja, boja proti korupciji in gospodarskih reform;
Insists that new legislation should be rapidly implemented, since this provides a reliable yardstick against which to assess the country's preparedness for membership, a preparedness based on facts and not merely on the adopted legislation, e specially as far as judicial reform, the fight against corruption and economic reforms are concerned ;
27. poziva Hrvaško, naj pokaže pripravljenost za reševanje vseh odprtih vprašanj glede meje, in pričakuje enako pripravljenost in podporo na strani vseh sosednjih držav; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja neformalni načelni sporazum o vprašanju arbitraže, ki sta ga dosegla predsednika hrvaške in slovenske vlade, in obe strani poziva, naj uresničujeta ta sporazum ter podpreta rezultat arbitraže z jasno odločitvijo parlamentov obeh držav;
Asks Croatia t o show readiness in resolving all the outstanding border issues and expects the same readiness and support on the part of all its neighbours; welcomes in this respect the informal agreement in principle reached by the Prime Ministers of Croatia and Slovenia on the issue of arbitration, and asks both sides to implement that agreement and to endorse the result of the arbitration by a clear decision by the two countries' parliaments ;
29. želi pohvaliti Hrvaško za nepretrgan napredek, ki ga dosega na področju regionalnega sodelovanja, in jo hkrati poziva, naj nadaljuje po tej poti na področju dobrososedskih odnosov, saj sta obe področji bistveni za evropsko povezovanje;
Commends Croatia on the continual progress it has made in the field of regional cooperation and at the same time urges it to continue on this path in the field of good neighbourly relations, since both these areas are crucial for European integration;
32. v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi svoja prizadevanja in poveča sredstva, dodeljena za pripravo, obdelavo in dokončanje pogajalskih gradiv, da bi se lahko EU hitro in učinkovito odzivala na napredek, ki ga Hrvaška dosega pri izpolnjevanju ustreznih meril za odpiranje in zapiranje pogajanj;
Calls in this context on the Commission to step up its efforts and increase the resources allocated for the preparation, processing and finalisation of negotiating material so that the EU can respond rapidly and efficiently to progress made by Croatia in meeting the relevant opening and closing benchmarks;
o skupnem besedilu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih pravilih na področju varnosti civilnega letalstva in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002
***II Postępek soodločanja (druga obravnava)
***II Codecision procedure (second reading)
– ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor in zadevne izjave Komisije (PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee and the relevant Commission statements (PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 ),
Sprejeta besedila, 25.4.2007, P6_TA(2007)0142 . o skupnem stališču Sveta
Texts adopted, 25.4.2007, P6_TA(2007)0142 . on the Council common position
UL C 70 E, 27.3.2007, str.
OJ C 70 E, 27.3.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2007)0475 ),
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2007)0475 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6‑0049/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0049/2008 ),
Komisija je predlog uredbe o skupnih pravilih na področju varnosti civilnega letalstva sprejela 22. septembra 2005 ( KOM(2005)0429 ).
The proposal for a Regulation on common rules in the field of civil aviation security was adopted by the Commission on 22 September 2005 ( COM(2005)0429 ).
Glavni cilj predloga je bil nadomestiti uredbo 2320/2002 o določitvi skupnih pravil na področju varnosti civilnega letalstva, ki je bila sprejeta v naglici po 11. septembru 2001.
The fundamental aim of the proposal was to replace Regulation 2320/2002 establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security, which had been adopted very quickly after 11 September 2001.
Po dveh letih in pol uporabe uredbe 2320/2002 je postalo očitno, da je treba sprejeti enostavnejši in prožnejši zakonodajni okvir, in sicer takšen, ki bi izvedbeni zakonodaji prepuščal večje število odločitev, kot je to dopuščala prejšnja, zelo podrobna zakonodaja.
After two and a half years of experience with Regulation 2320/2002, it was apparent that a simpler and more flexible legislative framework was needed; one which would leave more decisions to implementing legislation than had the previous, very detailed legislation.
Hkrati je bilo ocenjeno, da je potrebna višja stopnja usklajenosti, da bi olajšali delovanje industrije.
At the same time, a greater degree of harmonisation was considered necessary to facilitate operations of the industry.
Nazadnje je bilo izraženo tudi upanje, da bi večja jasnost povečala učinkovitost pri izvajanju varnostnih standardov.
Finally, it was hoped that greater clarity would make for more effective implementation of the security standards.
Tako kot uredba 2320/2002 je predlog zajemal vprašanja, kot so varnostni standardi na letališčih (na primer varnostni pregledi potnikov, prepovedani predmeti in tovor), načini spremljanja skladnosti s skupnimi standardi (na primer inšpekcijski pregledi Komisije) in mednarodno sodelovanje.
Like Regulation 2320/2002, the proposal covered issues such as the security standards to be followed at airports (e.g. the screening of passengers, prohibited articles or cargo), the means to monitor compliance with the common standards (e.g. Commission inspections), and international cooperation.
Zakonodajni postopek pred spravnim postopkom
The legislative procedure before conciliation
Odbor za promet in turizem, ki je bil pristojni odbor, je za poročevalca imenoval Paola Costo.
The committee responsible, the Committee on Transport and Tourism, appointed Mr Costa as rapporteur.
Prva obravnava predloga v Parlamentu je bila 15. junija 2006.
The Parliament held its first reading on 15 June 2006.
Parlament in Svet sta v času finskega predsedovanja poskušala doseči zgodnji dogovor v drugi obravnavi.
Contacts between the Parliament and the Council took place during the Finnish Presidency in an attempt to reach an early second reading agreement.
Sporazumni sveženj (v nadaljnjem besedila „finski kompromis”
A compromise package (later referred to as the "Finnish compromise"
Glej dokumente Sveta 14498/06, 14145/06, 12455/07 in DS 653/07 ) je Parlament vendarle zavrnil.
See Council documents 14498/06, 14145/06, 12455/07 and DS 653/07. ) was, however, rejected by the Parliament.
Nato je Svet 11. decembra 2006 sprejel svoje skupno stališče, druga obravnava v Parlamentu pa je potekala 25. aprila 2007.
Thereafter, the Council adopted its common position, on 11 December 2006: the Parliament's second reading took place on 25 April 2007.
Parlament je v drugi obravnavi sprejel 97 predlogov sprememb.
At second reading, the Parliament adopted 97 amendments.
Po njegovem mnenju Svet v skupnem stališču ni rešil vprašanja delitve stroškov pri ukrepih za letalsko varnost.
In Parliament's view, the Council's common position had failed to address the question of cost sharing for aviation security measures.
Parlament je glede vprašanja financiranja znova zavzel svoje stališče iz prve obravnave.
The Parliament restored its first reading position on the issue of financing.
Delegacija Parlamenta v Spravnem odboru se je prvič sestala 10. julija 2007.
The constituent meeting of Parliament's delegation to the Conciliation Committee was held on 10 July 2007.
Njegovi člani so pooblastili predsednico odbora TRAN Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, poročevalca Paola Costo in druga dva člana pogajalske skupine, Georga Jarzembowskega in Saïda El Khadraouija, da začnejo neuradna pogajanja s Svetom.
Its members mandated the chair, Mrs Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, the chair of the TRAN committee and rapporteur, Mr Costa, and the other members of the negotiation team, Mr Jarzembowski and Mr El Khadraoui, to begin informal negotiations with the Council.
Pred uradnim začetkom spravnega postopka 20. novembra, so potekali štirje trialogi (4. septembra, 25. septembra, 10. oktobra in 13. novembra), delegacija Parlamenta pa se je sestala trikrat (5. septembra, 26. septembra in 23. oktobra).
Before the formal opening of the conciliation procedure on 20 November, four trialogues were held (on 4 September, 25 September, 10 October and 13 November) and the EP delegation met three times (on 5 September, 26 September and 23 October).
Ko se je spravni postopek uradno začel, sta dve najbolj sporni vprašanji še vedno ostajali financiranje ukrepov letalske varnosti in, kot se je pokazalo med postopkom, določbe komitologije.
When the conciliation procedure was formally opened, the two most controversial issues were still the financing of aviation security measures and, as had emerged during the procedure, the comitology provisions.
Na seji Spravnega odbora 20. novembra je Svet zastopal portugalski minister za promet Lino, Komisijo pa podpredsednik Barrot.
At the conciliation meeting of 20 November, the Council was represented by Mr Lino, Portuguese Minister of Transport, and the Commission by Vice-President Barrot.
Tudi po dveh trialogih in srečanjih delegacij ni bilo doseženega soglasja, zato je bilo delo Spravnega odbora prekinjeno.
Even after two trialogues and delegation meetings, no agreement could be reached and the Conciliation Committee was adjourned.
Naslednji trialog na politični ravni z ministrom Linom in komisarjem Barrotom je potekal 10. decembra.
A further trialogue at political level, with Mr Lino and Mr Barrot, took place on 10 December.
O vseh odprtih vprašanjih (financiranje, komitologija, prehod iz stare na novo pravno ureditev) se je razpravljajo, vendar ni bilo mogoče doseči celovitega sporazuma.
All main outstanding issues (financing, comitology, the transition from the old to the new legal regime) were discussed, but no overall agreement could be reached.
Delegacija Parlamenta, ki se je sestala naslednji dan, je zato Svetu predlagala sveženj predlogov v zvezi s tremi omenjenimi vprašanji.
The Parliament delegation meeting on the following day therefore proposed to the Council a package comprising proposals on the three issues mentioned above.
Ker Svet vseh predlogov ni mogel sprejeti, je bilo mogoče doseči končni dogovor šele po novem srečanju delegacije Parlamenta 18. decembra in po izmenjavi pisem med predsedujočim Svetu in vodjem delegacije Parlamenta.
Since the Council could not accept all of these proposals a final agreement could be found only after a further EP delegation meeting on 18 December and an exchange of letters between the Presidency-in-Office of the Council and the chair of the EP delegation.
1 Ureditev financiranja varnostnih ukrepov: K besedilu sta bila dodana dva člena (člen 5 o stroških za varnost in člen 22 o poročilu Komisije o financiranju).
IV.1 Arrangements for financing security measures: Two Articles (Security Costs (Article 5) and Commission Report on Financing (Article 22)) were added to the text.
Člen o stroških za varnost kot prvi korak predvideva nekatere določbe na tem področju.
The Article on Security Costs sets out, as a first step, certain provisions in this matter.