natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija spremlja postopek imenovanja certifikacijskih organov, ki ga izvajajo države članice, pa tudi njihovo delovanje.
The Commission shall monitor the designation of certification bodies by the Member States , as well as their functioning.
Kjer certifikacijski organ ne more ali ne more več izvajati svojih nalog svojih nalog, Komisija naroči državi članici, ki je imenovala ta organ, naj umakne imenovanje, razen če certifikacijski organ izvede nujne spremembe v roku, ki je določen glede na resnost problema."
Where a certification body cannot perform or no longer can perform its tasks, the Commission shall order the designating Member State to withdraw the designation unless the certification body makes the necessary changes within a period to be determined in relation to the severity of the problem."
Države članice so dolžne obvestiti Komisijo o imenovanju certifikacijskih organov in priložiti oceno o njihovi zmožnosti za izvajanje nalog.
Member States should be obliged to inform the Commission of the designation of certification bodies, including an assessment of their ability to perform the desired tasks.
To bo Komisiji omogočilo spremljati, kako države članice imenujejo certifikacijske organe, in bo države članice spodbudilo, da izboljšajo svoje postopke imenovanja.
This will enable the Commission to monitor the designation of certification bodies by the Member States and it will stimulate Member States to improve their designating procedures.
(1e) V členu 9 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(1e) In Article 9, the following paragraph shall be added:
Brez poseganja v zgoraj omenjene obveznosti vsaka država članica pred prejemom sredstev Skupnosti v določenem letu kot del letnega pregleda , kot določa odstavek 3 člena 53b finančne uredbe, na podlagi revizij in izjav, ki jih imajo na razpolago , izda izjavo o tem, da so finančne nadzorne strukture, določene z zakonodajo Skupnosti, utemeljene in učinkovite."
Without prejudice to the abovementioned obligations, each Member State shall, at the appropriate national level, prior to receiving Community funding in year N and on an annual basis, as part of the annual summary set out in Article 53 b, paragraph 3 of the Financial Regulation, issue a statement, based on available audits and declarations, declaring that the financial control structures required by Community law are in place and functioning."
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 3 Člen 17 a, odstavek 3, drugi pododstavek (Uredba (ES) št. 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 Article 17 a, paragraph 3, second subparagraph (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
Komisija lahko odloči, da letno poviša ta odstotek, če se pomanjkljivosti pojavljajo štiri leta ali dlje.
The Commission may decide to increase this percentage annually if the deficiencies in question have already persisted for 4 years or longer.
V primeru nenehnih pomanjkljivosti bi Komisija v določenem trenutku morala dobiti pooblastilo, da zahteva višji odstotek znižanja in tako poveča pritisk na države članice, da spremenijo svoje sisteme.
In the event of persistent deficiencies, the Commission ought at a certain point to acquire the power to impose larger percentage reductions in order to increase the pressure on Member States to change their systems.
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 5 A (novo) Člen 31, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES) št. 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5 A (new) Article 31, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
(5a) V členu 31 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(5a) In Article 31, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
Komisija oceni zneske, ki jih je treba izločiti iz financiranja na podlagi teže ugotovljene neskladnosti.
The Commission shall assess the amounts to be excluded on the basis of the gravity of the non-conformity recorded.
Pri tem upošteva naravo, trajanje in težo kršitve ter finančno škodo, povzročeno Skupnosti."
It shall take due account of the nature, duration and gravity of the infringement and of the financial damage caused to the Community."
Poleg narave in teže kršitve je treba pri določanju zneskov, ki se jih v primeru neskladnosti izključi, upoštevati tudi čas trajanja kršitve.
In addition to the nature and gravity of the infringement, its duration should also be taken into account in determining the amounts to be excluded in the event of non-compliance.
(6b) V členu 31 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(6a) In Article 31, the following paragraph shall be added:
Prvo letno poročilo povzame tudi podatke iz prejšnjega pododstavka za pretekla leta prejšnje finančne perspektive.“
The first annual report shall also summarise the data described in the previous subparagraph for already completed years of the previous financial perspective.
Zanimivo bi bilo tudi spremljati tudi učinkovitost te izjeme.
Moreover, it would be interesting to monitor the effectiveness of this exception.
(6b) V členu 32 se odstavek 5 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(6b) In Article 32, paragraph 5 shall be replaced by the following:
Države članice v poročilu iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 3 ločeno navedejo zneske, za katere izterjava ni bila izvršena v rokih iz prvega pododstavka tega odstavka.
Member States shall indicate separately in the summary report referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3 the amounts not recovered within the time-limits specified in the first subparagraph of this paragraph.
Če je v okviru postopka izterjave z dokončnim upravnim ali sodnim aktom ugotovljeno, da ni bilo nepravilnosti, zadevna država članica prijavi EKJS odhodek, nastal zaradi finančnega bremena, ki ga je imela po prvem pododstavkom.
Where, in the context of the recovery procedure, the absence of any irregularity is recorded by an administrative or legal instrument of a definitive nature, the Member State concerned shall declare as expenditure to the EAGF the financial burden borne by it under the first subparagraph.
(Enako besedilo kot v Uredbi (ES) št. 1290/2005, črta pa se del pododstavka 1 in ves pododstavek 3)
(Same wording as that of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, but deleting parts of subparagraph 1 and the whole subparagraph 3)
Splošno pravilo enakega bremena v primeru neizvršene izterjave, torej 50 % iz proračuna ES in 50 % iz proračuna države članice, lahko privede do nasprotnih učinkov.
The general rule of equal burden-sharing in case of non-recovery, i.e. 50% for the EC budget and 50% for the budget of the Member State concerned, is counterproductive.
Uredba Sveta predvideva, da država članica lahko celo zadrži 100 % sredstev, če lahko z upravno ali sodno odločbo dokaže, da pri ni bilo nepravilnosti.
The Council Regulation already foresees that if the Member State concerned can prove the absence of an irregularity by a definitive administrative or court decision it may even keep 100% of the amounts.
(7a) V členu 33 se prvi pododstavek odstavka 8 nadomesti z naslednjim:
(7a) In Article 33, paragraph 8, the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
Če do izterjave ni prišlo pred zaključkom programa za razvoj podeželja, zadevna država članica krije finančne posledice zaradi neizvršene izterjave in se jih upošteva ali ob izteku roka štirih let po prvi upravni ali sodni ugotovitvi, ali osmih let, če je izterjava predmet tožbe pred nacionalnimi sodišči, ali ob zaključku programa če ti roki potečejo pred njegovim zaključkom."
If recovery has not taken place prior to the closure of a rural development programme, the financial consequences of non-recovery shall be borne by the Member State concerned and shall be taken into account either at the end of the period of four years following the first administrative or judicial finding or eight years where recovery action is taken in the national courts, or on the closure of the programme if those deadlines expire prior to such closure."
ČLEN 1, TOČKA 9 A (novo) Člen 43 a (Uredba (ES) št. 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 9 A (new) Article 43 a (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
(9a) Vstavi se naslednji člen 43 a:
(9a) The following Article 43 a is inserted:
"Člen 43 a
"Article 43 a
Ocenjevalna poročila
Evaluation reports
V letih 2008–2009 Komisija pripravi ocenjevalno poročilo, ki mu po možnosti priloži zakonodajne predloge*.
In 2008-2009 the Commission shall draw up an evaluation report, possibly accompanied by legislative proposals*.
V letu 2011 Komisija pripravi ocenjevalno poročilo, ki mu po možnosti priloži zakonodajne predloge, predvsem za objektivno porazdelitev kmetijskega sklada in sklada za razvoj podeželja, raje na podlagi objektivnih meril kot na osnovi pretekle porabe in kompromisov v Svetu.
In 2011 the Commission shall draw up an evaluation report, possibly accompanied by legislative proposals, considering, in particular, the objective distribution of agricultural and rural development funds, on the basis of objective criteria rather than taking as its starting point historical expenditure and compromises in the Council.
Trenutno je dovolj pozvati k oblikovanju objektivnih meril, ki jih bo treba natančno opredeliti pozneje v razpravi o skupni kmetijski politiki.
It is sufficient now to call for objective criteria, to be determined later during the debate on the CAP.
Financiranje skupne kmetijske politike
Financing of the common agricultural policy
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUN O FINANČNI SKLADNOSTI
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS ON FINANCIAL COMPATIBILITY
Subject: Mnenje v obliki pisma o predlogu Komisije o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike
Subject: Opinion in form of a letter to Commission proposal on Financing of the CAP
Odbor za proračun, ki mu predsedujem, je 5. junija 2007 glasoval o naslednjih zaključkih o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike ( KOM(2007)0122 ), ki ga je predložila Komisija, in me zadolžil, da Vas obvestim o izidu glasovanja.
On 5 June 2007, the committee on Budgets, which I have the honour to chair, has voted on the following conclusions concerning Commission proposal COM(2007)0122 , for a Council regulation amending Council regulation (EC) Nr. 1290/2005 on the Financing of the CAP and has charged me to inform you on the outcome of this vote.
Odbor za proračun podpira pristop Komisije, da se objavo ustreznih podatkov prepusti državam članicam.
The committee on Budgets can support the approach of the European Commission leaving the publication of the relevant data at Member State level: Pursuant to Article 53b, paragraph 2, lit. d of the Financial Regulation
V skladu s členom 53b(2)(d) finančne uredbe države članice zagotovijo naknadno letno objavo upravičencev EKJS in EKSPR ter zneske, ki jih vsak upravičenec prejme iz posameznega sklada (člen 44a predloga).
Financial Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 of 22 June 2002 as modified by Council regulation 1995/2006 of 13 December 2006 , Member States shall ensure annual ex-post publication of the beneficiaries of the EAGF and the EAFRD and the amounts received per beneficiary under each of these Funds (Article 44a of the proposal).
Vendar ni jasno, kako se bo zagotovilo enotno raven podatkov iz 27 držav članic.
However, it is not clear how a uniform level of information provided by the 27 Member States shall be ensured.
Čeprav predlog določa, da objava vsebuje za EKJS vsaj znesek, ki je razčlenjen na neposredna plačila v smislu člena 2(d) uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003, in druge odhodke ter za EKSRP celotni znesek javnega financiranja na upravičenca, obstaja nevarnost, da bodo te določbe izvajane z različno stopnjo natančnosti v vsaki državi članici.
Although the proposal provides that "the publication shall contain for the EAGF at least the amount subdivided in direct payments within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and other expenditure and for the EAFRD the total amount of public funding per beneficiary", there is a danger that these provisions being implemented with a different degree of detail in each Member State.
Z začetkom veljavnosti bo predlagana uredba v celoti zavezujoča in se bo v skladu s členom 249 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi ES neposredno uporabljala v vseh državah članicah.
Once in force, the proposed regulation would be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, according to Article 249 TEC.
Vendar mora biti vsak akt Skupnosti dovolj jasen in natančen, da ima lahko neposreden učinek.
But Community acts have to be sufficiently clear and precise in order to have direct effect.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. oktobra 1973, Carl Schlüter proti Hauptzollamt Lörrach, C–9/73, točka 6 Zdi se, da (novi) člen 44a ne izpolnjuje te pravne zahteve, ker sam po sebi ni jasen in dovolj natančen ter pušča možnost za presojo organom (držav članic), ki jih bodo izvajali.
Judgment of the Court of 24 October 1973, Carl Schlüter v Hauptzollamt Lörrach, C-9/73, point 6 It appears that the provision foreseen in Article 44a (new) is not fulfilling this legal requirement as it is in itself not clear and sufficiently precise and leaves a margin of discretion to the authorities (of the Member State) by whom it is to be applied.
Besedilo člena 44a na primer ne nudi odgovora na vprašanje, ali mora država članica objaviti tudi ime ali samo priimek, ali, če je to primer, tudi firmo gospodarske družbe (ali pravne osebe, ki je uradno prejela znesek).
For example, the proposed wording of Article 44a leaves it open if the Member State has to publish also the first name, or only the surname, or in case, also the firm of a company (or legal entity formally receiving the grant).
Odbor za proračun meni, da ni jasno, ali določilo, da "objava vsebuje vsaj naslednje podatke", pušča preveliko možnost presoje organom države članice, da na primer objavi tudi kraj in/ali stalno bivališče upravičenca.
In the opinion of the committee on Budgets it is not clear if the provision "the publication shall contain at least" gives a too large margin of discretion to the authorities of the Member State to publish also the community and /or place of residence of the beneficiary, e.g.
Dodatno zaskrbljenost povzroča vprašanje, kako zagotoviti primerljivost in dostopnost objavljenih podatkov.
Another concern is how the data to be published will be comparable and easily accessible?
Med pogajanji o zadnji spremembi finančne uredbe Komisija ni hotela prevzeti nobene pravne odgovornosti za vsebino podatkov, prejetih od držav članic.
During the negotiations on the last reform of the Financial Regulation, the Commission was opposing to take any legal responsibility of the content of the data received from the Member States.
Po drugi strani pa bi GD AGRI Evropske komisije lahko nudil javnosti pregled naslovov, kjer so na voljo ustrezni podatki, v obliki seznama povezav do spletnih strani skupaj z izjavo o odklonitvi pravne odgovornosti za vsebine spletnih strani, za katere so izključno odgovorni pristojni organi držav članic.
On the other hand it should be feasible for the European Commission, DG AGRI, to offer to the public an overview of the location where to find the relevant data under the form of a "link list", whilst declining in a legal disclaimer responsibility for the contents of the websites which remain under the sole responsibility of the competent Member States authorities.
To bi v praksi omogočilo dostopnost podatkov in pojasnilo zainteresirani strani, da je podatke zbrala država članica in ne Komisija.
This would render the information accessible in practice whilst making clear for every interested party that the data is collected by the Member State and not by the Commission.
Končno meni Odbor za proračun, da je nesprejemljivo, da naj bi Komisija sprejela podrobna pravila glede obveznosti držav članic v zvezi z objavo podatkov o upravičencih iz člena 44a, vključno z vidiki varstva posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov, v okviru postopka komitologije, ki je predviden v členu 41(2).
Finally, the committee on Budgets is of the opinion that it is unacceptable that the detailed rules as to the obligation of the Member States to publish information on beneficiaries laid down in Article 44a, including aspects related to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data should be adopted by the Commission by a comitology procedure provided for in Article 41(2).
Jasno je, da je namen zakonodajnega predloga vprašanje, kateri podatki bodo objavljeni.
It is clear that the question which data are going to be published is the very core of the purpose of the proposed piece of legislation.
Iz tega razloga ne more biti sprejemljivo, da Komisija trenutno predlaga precej nejasno besedilo v zvezi z zahtevami preglednosti (sprejetje s strani Sveta po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom) in da bo vse bistvene podrobnosti urejala kasneje s sprejetjem izvedbenih pravil (z uredbo Komisije brez nadzora EP).
It can therefore not be accepted that the Commission proposes a quite vague formulation of the transparency requirements at this stage (adoption by Council with consultation of the European Parliament) and will regulate all relevant details at a later stage, when adopting itself the implementing rules (Commission regulation without EP scrutiny).
o načrtu politike zakonitega priseljevanja
on the Policy Plan on Legal Migration
MNENJE Odbor za razvoj ..............................................................................................17
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................17
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................21
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ................................21
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................25
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...26
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................30
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................31
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Načrt politike zakonitega priseljevanja“ ( KOM(2005)0669 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on the Policy Plan on Legal Migration ( COM(2005)0669 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o prednostnih nalogah politike v boju proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju državljanov tretjih držav ( KOM(2006)0402 );
– having regard to the Commission Communication on policy priorities in the fight against the illegal immigration of third-country nationals ( COM(2006)0402 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 26. februarja 2007 z naslovom „Načrt politike zakonitega priseljevanja, boj proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju, prihodnost evropske migracijske mreže“ (OR 233/2006),
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2007 entitled 'Policy plan on legal migration, fight against legal immigration, future of the European migration network' (CdR 233/2006),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta 4. in 5. novembra 20004 in haaškega programa, ki je del teh sklepov
– having regard to conclusions of the European Council presidency of 4-5 November 2004 and the Hague Programme included therein
Sklepi Evropskega sveta, Priloga I,točka III. ,
European Council conclusions, Annex I, point III. ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom „Globalni pristop k vprašanju migracij leto pozneje: za celovito evropsko migracijsko politiko“ ( KOM(2006)0735 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament entitled 'The global approach to migration one year on: towards a comprehensive European migration policy' ( COM(2006)0735 ),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige o pristopu EU do urejanja ekonomske migracije ( KOM(2004)0811 ) in svoje resolucije o tej temi, sprejete 26. oktobra 2005
– having regard to the Green Paper on an EU approach to managing economic migration ( COM(2004)0811 ) and its resolution of 26 October 2005 on that topic
UL C 272 E, 09.11.06, str.
OJ C 272 E, 9.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom „Skupni program za vključevanje – Okvir za vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav v Evropsko unijo“ ( KOM(2005)0389 ) in svoje resolucije, sprejete 6. julija 2006 o strategijah in sredstvih za vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav v Evropsko unijo
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions - A Common Agenda for Integration - Framework for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals in the European Union ( COM(2005)0389 ), and its resolution of 6 July 2006 on strategies and means for the integration of immigrants in the European Union
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0318 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0318 . ,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 862/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z 11. julija 2007 o statistikah Skupnosti o selitvah in mednarodni zaščiti
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on Community statistics on migration and international protection
UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str.
OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju ugotovitev ministrske konference med EU in Afriko o migracijah in razvoju 10. in 11. julija 2006 v Rabatu,
– having regard to the outcome of the EU-Africa ministerial conference on migration and development, which was held in Rabat on 10 and 11 July 2006,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Afrike in EU o migracijah in razvoju, sprejete na ministrski konferenci med EU in Afriko 22. in 23. novembra 2006 v Tripoliju,
– having regard to the EU-Africa joint declaration on migration and development which was adopted at the EU-Africa ministerial conference held in Tripoli on 22 and 23 November 2006,
– ob upoštevanju splošnega pristopa, kot je bil potrjen v sklepih predsedstva na Evropskem svetu 14. in 15. decembra 2006 v Bruslju,
– having regard to the comprehensive approach as reaffirmed in the presidency conclusions following the 14-15 December 2006 Brussels European Council,
– ob upoštevanju poročila skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU o migracijah kvalificiranih delavcev in njihovem vplivu na nacionalni razvoj, ki je bil sprejet 28. junija 2007;
– having regard to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly's report on migration of skilled workers and its effect thereof upon national development, which was adopted on 28 June 2007,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o uporabi globalnega pristopa k migracijam za vzhodne in jugovzhodne regije, ki mejijo na Evropsko unijo ( KOM(2007)0247 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled 'Applying the global approach to migration to the eastern and south-eastern regions neighbouring the European Union' ( COM(2007)0247 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o krožni migraciji in partnerstvih za mobilnost med Evropsko unijo in tretjimi državami ( KOM(2007)0248 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on circular migration and mobility partnerships between the European Union and third countries ( COM(2007)0248 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sankcijah zoper delodajalce državljanov tretjih držav, ki nezakonito prebivajo v EU ( KOM(2007)0249 – C6-0143/2007 – 2007/0094(COD) ),
– having regard to the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council providing for sanctions against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals ( COM(2007)0249 - C6-0143/2007 - 2007/0094(COD) ),
– ob upoštevanju amsterdamske pogodbe, ki Skupnosti podeljuje pooblastila in obveznosti na področju priseljevanja in azila, in člena 63 pogodbe ES,
– having regard to the Amsterdam Treaty (pursuant to which powers and responsibilities in the immigration and asylum fields are conferred upon the Community) and Article 63 of the EC Treaty,