natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tako bi izboljšali mednarodno sodelovanje in povečali legitimnost na področju svetovne ureditve, ki je še posebej pomembno za celotno človeštvo.
International cooperation and legitimacy would thus be strengthened in one sphere of government in the world that is particularly relevant for humanity as a whole.
Pri upravljanju interneta se porajajo številni izzivi, med katerimi je tudi tveganje razdrobitve svetovnega omrežja na nacionalna omrežja – na to nevarnost že opozarjajo dogodki na Kitajskem in v Iranu – če se sedanji sistem upravljanja ne bo razvil in spremenil.
There are many challenges in internet governance, one of which is the risk of the global network fragmenting – producing national networks, a danger already posed by China and Iran – if the current system of management does not develop and change.
Poročevalec zato predlaga, da se Evropski parlament osredotoči na naslednje vidike:
The rapporteur therefore suggests that Parliament should emphasise the following:
Internet je „svetovna javna dobrina“, zato njegovo upravljanje in nadzor, ki ju enostransko izvaja ena sama država, sprožata številne in utemeljene kritike.
The internet is ‘global public property’; the unilateral management and control of this public property by one Government gives rise to widespread and well founded criticism.
Evropska unija mora oblikovati strategijo, v kateri bo povzela svoje enotno stališče glede temeljnih vidikov upravljanja interneta in ki jo bo lahko odločno zastopala na mednarodnih forumih ter v dvostranskih odnosih z ZDA.
The European Union must develop a strategy that reflects a consensus view on fundamental aspects of internet governance and can be firmly defended in international forums and in its bilateral relations with the USA.
Parlament podpira pozitivno stališče Komisije glede sedanjega modela upravljanja, ki temelji na vodilni vlogi zasebnega sektorja.
Support for the Commission’s position in favour of the current management model based on private-sector leadership.
Svojo podporo mora pogojevati s tem, da se odpravijo pomanjkljivosti pri nekaterih vidikih delovanja in sestave organizacije ICANN.
This support must be conditional upon action being taken to remedy criticisms regarding certain aspects of how ICANN is composed and functions.
Stališče glede organizacije ICANN:
In respect of ICANN:
(a) Nadzor in odgovornost: sprejetje izjave o potrditvi zavez med organizacijo ICANN in vlado ZDA novembra 2009 je bil korak naprej k uresničitvi dveh načel, ki sta za EU temeljnega pomena – internacionalizaciji interneta in priznanju njegovega „javnega interesa“.
(a) control and accountability: the adoption of the ‘Affirmation of Commitments’ between ICANN and the US Government in November 2009 represents a step forward towards two fundamental principles for the EU: internationalisation and recognition of the internet’s ‘public interest’.
Novi dogovor uvaja nadzorni mehanizem (odbore za pregled) na osnovnih področjih upravljanja interneta, kot so preglednost in odgovornost, stabilnost in varnost omrežja, konkurenca in varstvo potrošnikov.
The new agreement introduces ‘review panels’ to act as a control mechanism over fundamental aspects of managing the network, such as transparency and accountability, network stability and security, competition and consumer protection.
Čeprav je sporazum velikopotezen in obetaven, se bo šele sčasoma pokazalo, kako se uresničuje.
Although the agreement is ambitious and promising, it remains nonetheless to be seen how it is implemented.
Evropske institucije morajo dejavno sodelovati pri izvajanju in razvoju novega dogovora ter skrbeti, da bo sestava odborov za pregled odsevala geografsko raznolikost, spoštovala neodvisnost članstva in se izogibala vsem oblikam navzkrižja interesov.
The EU institutions must play an active part in implementing and developing the new contract, monitoring the composition of the review panels to ensure that their members are independent and from different parts of the world and that there are no conflicts of interest of any kind.
To je nujno, da se zagotovi legitimnost, neodvisnost in nepristranskost novega organa v mednarodni skupnosti.
This is fundamental if the new body is to be seen as legitimate, independent and objective in the eyes of the international community.
Razmisliti je treba tudi o evropski udeležbi v odborih za pregled, najverjetneje o enem sedežu za Komisijo.
The EU’s place on the review panel, preferably one seat for the Commission, must also be decided on.
Prav tako se je treba zavzeti za ustrezno zastopanost vladnega svetovalnega odbora v teh odborih.
Likewise, the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) must also have a sufficient number of places on the panels.
Priporočila, ki jih bodo pripravili odbori za pregled, bo moral upravni odbor organizacije ICANN spoštovati, če jih ne bo, pa bo moral svojo odločitev ustrezno utemeljiti.
As for the recommendations made by the review panel, these must be implemented by ICANN’s Board of Directors and in the event that it does not do so, the Board must give its reasons.
Za takšne primere je treba predvideti pritožbeni mehanizem, ki bi lahko bil na primer mednarodna arbitraža.
Provision needs to be made for an appeal mechanism, which could well be international arbitration, for these cases.
(b) Demokratična udeležba v dejavnostih organizacije ICANN: zagotoviti je treba zastopanost vseh interesnih skupin v svetu interneta (vlade, združenja, podjetja, uporabniki,…).
(b) Democratic participation in ICANN’s activities: all interested parties in the internet world (governments, associations, businesses, users, etc.) must be represented in ICANN.
Pri tem je še posebej pomemben vladni svetovalni odbor, saj je sredstvo, prek katerega lahko vlade nadzirajo sprejetje internega pravilnika organizacije ICANN.
The GAC is particularly important here as it is through the GAC that governments can ‘control’ the adoption of ICANN’s internal rules.
Zaradi tega se je treba dogovoriti, kdo je upravičen do članstva v tem odboru, kar pa je sporno vprašanje, saj utegne udeležba nedemokratičnih držav z vrednotami, ki se močno razlikujejo od evropskih, ogroziti ohranjanje „evropskega pravnega reda“.
The membership of this Committee must be decided on, therefore, but this is a controversial issue since the participation of undemocratic countries whose values differ greatly from European ones may entail a risk to protection of the ‘EU acquis’.
Premisliti je treba tudi o postopku odločanja v vladnem svetovalnem odboru, nezavezujoči naravi njegovih priporočil ter mehanizmih reševanja sporov v primeru nesoglasja med svetovalnim in upravnim odborom.
Likewise, thought must be given to the GAC’s decision-making process, the purely advisory nature of its recommendations and the mechanisms for resolving conflicts in the event of disagreement between the GAC and the Board of Directors.
Navsezadnje je treba še naprej zagotavljati nacionalno raznolikost članov najvišjega vodstva organizacije ICANN.
Finally, ICANN’s top management team represents a range of nationalities and this must continue to be the case.
(c) Financiranje: sedaj se večina sredstev zbere s prispevki ZDA, pa tudi s pristojbinami za registracijo domen in generičnih vrhnjih domen (gTLD).
(c) Finance: the major part of ICANN’s funds come nowadays from US contributions, plus domain name and gTLD registry fees.
Zaželeno bi bilo, da se omogoči tudi financiranje iz drugih virov za zagotovitev njihove raznolikosti in preprečitev nezaželenih prevladujočih položajev.
Opening up to funding from other sources would be preferable in order to diversify sources and prevent undesirable dominant positions.
Forum o upravljanju interneta se je izkazal za zelo uspešnega.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) has proved a success.
Njegova odprta narava, prilagodljivost, široka udeležba različnih vpletenih sektorjev in razvoj upravljavske „družine” (Eurodig, nacionalni in regionalni forumi) predstavljajo enkraten in primeren model (razprava brez omejitev) za novo področje, kakršno je internet.
Its open nature, flexibility, the high level of participation by the different sectors involved, the development of the governance ‘family’ (Eurodig, national forums, regional forums) all constitute a unique model (issues are debated and discussed without any restrictions) that is relevant and very appropriate for a new sphere like the internet.
Evropski parlament se zavzema za njegovo nadaljnje delovanje.
Parliament is very much in favour of this continuing.
Nekatere vidike bi bilo treba izboljšati, med drugim:
The following are some areas where improvements are needed:
– udeležbo držav v razvoju, zlasti financiranje njihove udeležbe,
– participation of developing countries and, specifically, funding for their participation,
– prepoznavnost v medijih,
– visibility in the media,
– notranje delovanje letnih srečanj foruma (zmanjšanje števila sočasnih srečanj, vzpostavitev trdnega okvira, ki bo olajšal udeležbo z vsega sveta in okrepil večjezičnost),
– internal running of IGF annual meetings (reduction in the number of meetings held simultaneously, establishment of a stable platform to facilitate global participation and greater multilingualism),
– usklajevanje z nacionalnimi in regionalnimi forumi, ki že tvorijo „družino“, kjer potekajo razprave o upravljanju interneta,
– coordination with national and regional forums, which already constitute a ‘family’ for discussions on internet governance,
– okrepitev parlamentarnega sodelovanja med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti.
– parliamentary cooperation between the EP and national parliaments must go deeper.
Glede srečanja v Vilni konec leta 2010 mora Evropski parlament podpreti delo Komisije ter prizadevanja španskega in belgijskega predsedstva.
As regards the meeting in Vilnius at the end of 2010, Parliament must support the work of the Commission and the Spanish and Belgian Presidencies.
Ker se bodo v naslednjih letih v zvezi z internetom po svetu pojavljale nove težave, je zelo pomembno, da evropske institucije nadaljujejo svoja prizadevanja – že zdaj so dejavne v mnogih pogledih – na vseh področjih, ki zadevajo evropske vrednote in dediščino temeljnih svoboščin, da bo mogoče slednje vključiti v svetovno upravljanje interneta.
Bearing in mind that problems involving the internet worldwide will continue to appear in forthcoming years, it is important that the EU institutions continue to work – as they are already doing on many fronts – on everything that may affect Europe’s values and fundamental rights’ heritage to ensure these are accepted in the global management of the internet.
Napredek je treba doseči zlasti na naslednjih področjih:
Progress must therefore continue to be made on the following:
– zagotavljanje pluralnega dostopa do interneta brez diskriminacije,
– guaranteeing plural and non-discriminatory access to the internet,
– zagovarjanje evropske ideje nevtralnosti interneta,
– defending the European view on internet neutrality,
– varnostna vprašanja v zvezi z grožnjami in napadi,
– aspects connected with security in the face of threats or attacks,
– zaščita pravice državljanov do zasebnosti in reševanje vprašanj, povezanih s pristojno sodno oblastjo in pravom, ki se uporablja, pri odločanju, kje bo potekal sodni proces (glede na to, da sporazum Rim II izrecno izključuje nepogodbene spore v zvezi s pravico do zasebnosti),
– protection of citizens’ right to privacy and resolution of questions as to who has jurisdiction and which law is applicable in deciding where cases are heard (given that the Rome II agreement expressly excludes non-contractual conflicts connected with the right to privacy),
– varstvo pravic intelektualne lastnine in jamstva glede dostopa uporabnikov do kulture,
– protection of intellectual property rights and guarantees regarding access to users’ culture,
– zagotavljanje svobodne konkurence,
– guaranteeing free competition,
– boj proti kriminalu, še posebej pa zaščita pravic mladoletnikov.
– combating crime and, specifically, protection of minors’ rights.
Pri tem je treba podpreti pobudo španskega predsedstva o pripravi evropske listine pravic uporabnikov interneta in njegov predlog, da se prizna peta evropska svoboščina, in sicer svoboden dostop do interneta.
Here, support must be given to the Spanish Presidency’s initiative in drawing up a European Charter of Internet Users’ Rights as well as its proposal that a fifth EU fundamental freedom, namely to internet access, be recognised.
Kar zadeva organizacijo in notranje delovanje Evropske unije, bi morale evropske institucije izboljšati usklajevanje odnosov z organizacijo ICANN, saj ti niso vedno najbolj smotrni.
Turning now to the EU’s own organisation and internal functioning, EU institutions need to make progress on coordinating their relations with ICANN, as these are not always rational.
Prizadevati si je treba, da se razjasni vloga Sveta in Komisije ter seveda vloga, ki naj bi jo dobil Evropski parlament.
An effort must be made to clarify the roles of the Council and the Commission and, naturally, the role to be granted to Parliament.
Enako velja za odnose, ki jih je treba vzpostaviti med evropskimi institucijami in državami članicami v vladnem svetovalnem odboru, znotraj Evropske unije pa tudi v skupini na visoki ravni za upravljanje interneta.
The same can be said of the relationships that must be established between the EU institutions and the Member States both on the GAC and, within the EU’s own High Level Group on internet governance.
Navsezadnje je treba opozoriti, da je upravljanje interneta še ena od priložnosti, da Evropska unija postane prepoznavna na mednarodnem prizorišču ter soglasno zastopa svojo vizijo in vrednote.
Finally, it should be pointed out that internet governance presents another opportunity for the EU to be seen to be present on the international scene, defending with one voice its vision and its values.
o upravljanju interneta: naslednji koraki
on Internet governance: the next steps
4. poziva k večji odgovornosti zasebnih podjetij, ki registrirajo in dodeljujejo imena domen, saj ponujajo storitev, ki je postala za družbo zelo pomembna; v zvezi s tem je treba vzpostaviti skupna merila, ki bi povečala preglednost in zagotovila, da ta podjetja prevzamejo večjo odgovornost;
Calls for greater accountability of private companies which register and distribute domain names, carrying out a service which society has become largely dependent upon; considers in this context that there is a need to establish a common set of criteria to follow, with a view to increasing transparency and ensuring that such companies take on increasing responsibilities;
6. poziva ICANN, naj vladam držav zagotovi večjo vlogo pri upravljanju interneta; meni, da mora upravni odbor korporacije ICANN ustrezno pojasniti svoja stališča, kadar se razlikujejo od priporočil vladnega svetovalnega odbora;
Asks the ICANN to give national governments a greater place in internet governance; considers that the ICANN Board of Directors should properly justify its positions when these differ from the recommendations of the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC);
8. poziva k lažjemu dostopu in razvoju interneta v novejših državah članicah, zlasti na podeželskih območjih, in v državah v razvoju prek programov, ki jih financira Evropska unija; poziva tudi, da se tem državam omogoči večji vpliv pri oblikovanju upravljanja interneta;
Calls for easier access to and development of the internet in newer Member States, particularly in rural areas, and in developing countries through programmes funded by the European Union; further calls for these countries to be granted greater influence in shaping internet governance policy;
10. meni, da morajo vsi prihodnji dogovori glede upravljanja odražati javni interes družbe kot celote in ne smejo biti podrejeni ozkim poslovnim ali regionalnim interesom; meni, da je treba ob upoštevanju tega izboljšati okvir javne politike;
Considers that any future governance arrangements should reflect the public interest of society as a whole and should not be subject to capture by narrow commercial or regional interests; considers that the public policy framework needs to be improved with this in mind;
12 obžaluje, da sporočilo Komisije pri načelih upravljanja interneta ne obravnava varstva pravic intelektualne lastnine, še posebej boja proti ponarejanju in piratstvu;
12 Regrets that the Commission Communication does not regard the protection of intellectual property rights, and especially the fight against counterfeiting and pirating, as a principle of internet governance;
2. v zvezi s tem meni, da morajo biti vse omejitve izvajanja teh temeljnih pravic v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin;
Considers in this respect that any restriction imposed on the exercise of these fundamental rights should be in accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
8. vendar opozarja, da internet kot globalni vir ne bi smel biti vezan na eno nacionalno vlado, zato poziva k vzpostavitvi novega globalnega modela internetnega upravljanja, ki bo temeljil na odgovornejšem in preglednejšem upravljanju;
Recalls nevertheless that the Internet as a global resource should not be tied to one national government and calls therefore for the emergence of a new global model of Internet governance, based on a more accountable and more transparent governance;
12. poziva Komisijo, naj začne posvetovanja, na primer med forumom za upravljanje interneta, Mednarodno telekomunikacijsko zvezo (ITU) in ICANN, da bi dosegli sporazum o preprečevanju internetnih napadov (spletna oboroževalna tekma );
Calls on the Commission to initiate consultations, inter alia between the Internet Governance Forum, the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and ICANN, with a view to reaching agreement on preventing Internet attacks (a cyber arms race);
Upravljanje interneta: naslednji koraki
on Internet governance: the next steps
Poročevalka: Cecilia Wikström
Rapporteur: Cecilia Wikström
A. ker upravljanje interneta pomembno vpliva na javno politiko zaradi načina, kako internet spreminja življenja in delovna okolja milijonov Evropejcev,
A. whereas Internet governance has important public policy implications, given the way in which the Internet has transformed the lives and working environments of millions of Europeans,
B. ker je internet postal pomemben vir in ima kakršna koli resna motnja v delovanju storitve lahko velike učinke na družbo in gospodarstvo,
B. whereas the Internet has become a critical resource and any serious disruption in service can have major effects on society and the economy,
2. pri tem poudarja pomembno vlogo vlad in njihovo odgovornost pri oblikovanju in izvajanju učinkovite politike splošnega interesa in zaščiti javnega interesa;
Stresses, however, the important role and responsibilities of governments in creating and pursuing effective policies of general interest and in defending the public interest;
Internetna korporacija za dodeljevanje imen in številk uspelo zagotoviti trdnost sistema domenskih imen;
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. has succeeded in guaranteeing the stability of the Domain Name System;
5. , predvsem v zvezi z udeležbo držav, ki teh načel ne spoštujejo;
5. , notably with regard to the participation of states that do not respect these principles;
8. poudarja, da bi morala načela upravljanja interneta upoštevati potrebo po zaščiti avtorskih pravic in drugih temeljnih pravic, kot so svoboda govora, varstvo podatkov, zasebnost in boj proti diskriminaciji, rasizmu in ksenofobiji; poudarja, da mora pravo EU zagotoviti varstvo avtorskih in človekovih pravic ter temeljnih svoboščin;
Stresses that Internet governance principles should take into consideration both the need to protect copyright and other fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression, data protection, privacy and the fight against discrimination, racism and xenophobia; stresses the need for EU law to secure the protection of copyright, human rights and basic freedoms;
10. poudarja, da so zaradi uspešnosti socialnih mrež, ki je povezana s tehničnimi zmogljivostmi interneta (spomin in obdelava podatkov), nastale težave zlasti s hrambo podatkov in uporabo arhiviranih podatkov; v zvezi s tem obžaluje, da na internetu še ni mogoče uveljavljati „pravice do pozabe“.
Stresses that the success of social networks, together with the Internet’s technical capacities in terms of memory and data processing, is giving rise to problems of data retention and the use of archived data; deplores the fact, in this respect, that there is currently no ‘right to forget’ on the Internet.
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. poudarja predvsem potrebo po okrepitvi pristopa od spodaj navzgor in e-demokracije ter sočasnem zagotavljanju znatnih zaščitnih ukrepov za preprečitev novih oblik nadzora, kontrole in cenzure s strani javnih ali privatnih akterjev, tako da bosta prost dostop do interneta in varovanje zasebnega življenja resnična in ne navidezna;
Underlines especially the need to enhance the evolution of ‘bottom-up’ approaches and of e-democracy, while simultaneously ensuring that significant safeguards are established against new forms of surveillance, control and censorship by public or private actors, so that the freedom of Internet access and the protection of private life are real and not illusory;
5. upošteva, da je treba s skupnim delovanjem javnih in zasebnih zainteresiranih strani posebej zaščititi ogrožene, zlasti mladoletnike; ponavlja, da je treba pri boju proti kibernetski kriminaliteti in otroški pornografiji odstraniti kaznive vsebine pri viru, namesto da se onemogoči dostop do spletnih mest;
Takes also into consideration the special need to protect vulnerable persons, particularly minors – through a joint action of public and private stakeholders; reiterates that when combating cybercrime and child pornography, criminal content should be deleted at the source before considering websites being blocked;
Alexander Alvaro, Elena Oana Antonescu, Edit Bauer, Andrew Henry William Brons, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Franziska Keller, Krisztina Morvai, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Raül Romeva i Rueda, Cecilia Wikström
Alexander Alvaro, Elena Oana Antonescu, Edit Bauer, Andrew Henry William Brons, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Franziska Keller, Krisztina Morvai, Mariya Nedelcheva, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Cecilia Wikström
o razpravah Odbora za peticije v letu 2009
on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the year 2009
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA........................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...................................3
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU......................................................25
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.............................................................25
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o razpravah Odbora za peticije,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions,
– ob upoštevanju členov 24 in 227 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 24 and 227 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju členov 10 in 11 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Articles 10 and 11 of the Treaty on the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju člena 48 in 202(8) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 48 and 202(8) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A7–0186/2010 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0186/2010 ),